This is a modern-English version of Domestic Manners of the Americans, originally written by Trollope, Frances Milton.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Domestic Manners of the Americans
by Fanny Trollope
First published in 1832
First published in 1832
Contents
CHAPTER I
Entrance of the Mississippi—Balize
Entrance of the Mississippi—Balize
On the 4th of November, 1827, I sailed from London, accompanied by my son and two daughters; and after a favourable, though somewhat tedious voyage, arrived on Christmas-day at the mouth of the Mississippi.
On November 4, 1827, I set sail from London with my son and two daughters; after a smooth, though somewhat long journey, we arrived on Christmas Day at the mouth of the Mississippi.
The first indication of our approach to land was the appearance of this mighty river pouring forth its muddy mass of waters, and mingling with the deep blue of the Mexican Gulf. The shores of this river are so utterly flat, that no object upon them is perceptible at sea, and we gazed with pleasure on the muddy ocean that met us, for it told us we were arrived, and seven weeks of sailing had wearied us; yet it was not without a feeling like regret that we passed from the bright blue waves, whose varying aspect had so long furnished our chief amusement, into the murky stream which now received us.
The first sign that we were close to land was the sight of this powerful river spilling out its muddy water and blending with the deep blue of the Gulf of Mexico. The banks of this river are so flat that nothing on them is visible from the sea, and we looked on happily at the muddy ocean before us, knowing we had finally arrived after seven weeks at sea, which had tired us out; yet, we couldn’t help but feel a bit of regret as we moved from the bright blue waves, whose changing beauty had entertained us for so long, into the murky river that awaited us.
Large flights of pelicans were seen standing upon the long masses of mud which rose above the surface of the waters, and a pilot came to guide us over the bar, long before any other indication of land was visible.
Large groups of pelicans were spotted sitting on the long stretches of mud that jutted out above the water's surface, and a pilot arrived to help us navigate over the bar, long before we could see any other signs of land.
I never beheld a scene so utterly desolate as this entrance of the Mississippi. Had Dante seen it, he might have drawn images of another Bolgia from its horrors. One only object rears itself above the eddying waters; this is the mast of a vessel long since wrecked in attempting to cross the bar, and it still stands, a dismal witness of the destruction that has been, and a boding prophet of that which is to come.
I’ve never seen a scene so completely abandoned as this entrance to the Mississippi. If Dante had seen it, he might have created illustrations of a different Bolgia from its horrors. One object rises above the swirling waters; it’s the mast of a ship that was wrecked long ago while trying to cross the bar, and it still stands, a gloomy reminder of the destruction that has happened and a foreboding sign of what’s to come.
By degrees bulrushes of enormous growth become visible, and a few more miles of mud brought us within sight of a cluster of huts called the Balize, by far the most miserable station that I ever saw made the dwelling of man, but I was told that many families of pilots and fishermen lived there.
By degrees, large bulrushes became visible, and after a few more miles of mud, we spotted a cluster of huts called the Balize. It was, without a doubt, the most miserable place I had ever seen that humans called home, but I was told that many families of pilots and fishermen lived there.
For several miles above its mouth, the Mississippi presents no objects more interesting than mud banks, monstrous bulrushes, and now and then a huge crocodile luxuriating in the slime. Another circumstance that gives to this dreary scene an aspect of desolation, is the incessant appearance of vast quantities of drift wood, which is ever finding its way to the different mouths of the Mississippi. Trees of enormous length, sometimes still bearing their branches, and still oftener their uptorn roots entire, the victims of the frequent hurricane, come floating down the stream. Sometimes several of these, entangled together, collect among their boughs a quantity of floating rubbish, that gives the mass the appearance of a moving island, bearing a forest, with its roots mocking the heavens; while the dishonoured branches lash the tide in idle vengeance: this, as it approaches the vessel, and glides swiftly past, looks like the fragment of a world in ruins.
For several miles upstream from its mouth, the Mississippi shows nothing more interesting than mud banks, huge reeds, and occasionally a large crocodile lounging in the muck. Another factor that adds to this bleak scene is the constant presence of large amounts of driftwood that makes its way to the various mouths of the Mississippi. Enormous trees, sometimes still holding their branches and more often with their uprooted roots intact, victims of frequent hurricanes, float down the river. Sometimes several of these trees get tangled together, collecting bits of floating debris in their branches, which makes the mass look like a moving island carrying a forest, its roots mocking the sky, while the damaged branches lash the water in meaningless fury: as it approaches the boat and glides swiftly by, it resembles a remnant of a world in ruins.
As we advanced, however, we were cheered, notwithstanding the season, by the bright tints of southern vegetation. The banks continue invariably flat, but a succession of planless villas, sometimes merely a residence, and sometimes surrounded by their sugar grounds and negro huts, varied the scene. At no one point was there an inch of what painters call a second distance; and for the length of one hundred and twenty miles, from the Balize to New Orleans, and one hundred miles above the town, the land is defended from the encroachments of the river by a high embankment which is called the Levee; without which the dwellings would speedily disappear, as the river is evidently higher than the banks would be without it. When we arrived, there had been constant rains, and of long continuance, and this appearance was, therefore, unusually striking, giving to “this great natural feature” the most unnatural appearance imaginable; and making evident, not only that man had been busy there, but that even the mightiest works of nature might be made to bear his impress; it recalled, literally, Swift’s mock heroic,
As we moved forward, we felt uplifted, despite the season, by the bright colors of the southern plants. The riverbanks remained flat, but a series of random villas—sometimes just homes and sometimes surrounded by their sugar fields and worker shacks—added variety to the view. At no point was there a hint of what artists call a second distance; for a stretch of one hundred and twenty miles from the Balize to New Orleans, and one hundred miles beyond the city, the land is protected from the river's encroachment by a tall levee; without it, the houses would quickly vanish, as the river is clearly higher than the banks would be without this barrier. When we arrived, there had been persistent rainfall for quite a while, making the scene unusually striking, giving "this great natural feature" the most unnatural look possible; it clearly showed that humans had been hard at work there, and that even the most powerful natural wonders could be shaped by human hands; it reminded me, quite literally, of Swift’s mock heroic.
“Nature must give way to art;”
“Nature has to make room for art;”
yet, she was looking so mighty, and so unsubdued all the time, that I could not help fancying she would some day take the matter into her own hands again, and if so, farewell to New Orleans.
yet, she looked so powerful and so unconquerable all the time that I couldn't help thinking she would one day take control of the situation again, and if that happened, it would be goodbye to New Orleans.
It is easy to imagine the total want of beauty in such a landscape; but yet the form and hue of the trees and plants, so new to us, added to the long privation we had endured of all sights and sounds of land, made even these swampy shores seem beautiful. We were, however, impatient to touch as well as see the land; but the navigation from the Balize to New Orleans is difficult and tedious, and the two days that it occupied appeared longer than any we had passed on board.
It’s easy to picture the complete lack of beauty in such a landscape; but still, the shapes and colors of the trees and plants, so unfamiliar to us, combined with the long time we had gone without any sights or sounds of land, made even these swampy shores seem beautiful. However, we were eager to not just see but also touch the land; but the journey from the Balize to New Orleans is tough and slow, and the two days it took felt longer than any we had spent on board.
In truth, to those who have pleasure in contemplating the phenomena of nature, a sea voyage may endure many weeks without wearying. Perhaps some may think that the first glance of ocean and of sky shew all they have to offer; nay, even that that first glance may suggest more of dreariness than sublimity; but to me, their variety appeared endless, and their beauty unfailing. The attempt to describe scenery, even where the objects are prominent and tangible, is very rarely successful; but where the effect is so subtile and so varying, it must be vain. The impression, nevertheless, is perhaps deeper than any other; I think it possible I may forget the sensations with which I watched the long course of the gigantic Mississippi; the Ohio and the Potomac may mingle and be confounded with other streams in my memory, I may even recall with difficulty the blue outline of the Alleghany mountains, but never, while I remember any thing, can I forget the first and last hour of light on the Atlantic.
Honestly, for those who enjoy observing nature, a sea voyage can last for weeks without becoming boring. Some might believe that the first sight of the ocean and the sky reveals everything they have to offer; in fact, that initial view might even feel more dull than awe-inspiring. But to me, their variety seems limitless, and their beauty never fades. Trying to describe a landscape, even when the elements are clear and tangible, rarely succeeds; but when the effect is so subtle and ever-changing, it becomes impossible. Yet the experience might leave a deeper impression than any other. I might forget the feelings I had while watching the long stretch of the mighty Mississippi; the Ohio and the Potomac might blur together with other rivers in my mind, and I might struggle to remember the blue outline of the Allegheny mountains. But as long as I have memory, I will never forget the first and last hour of light on the Atlantic.
The ocean, however, and all its indescribable charm, no longer surrounded us; we began to feel that our walk on the quarter-deck was very like the exercise of an ass in a mill; that our books had lost half their pages, and that the other half were known by rote; that our beef was very salt, and our biscuits very hard; in short, that having studied the good ship, Edward, from stem to stern till we knew the name of every sail, and the use of every pulley, we had had enough of her, and as we laid down, head to head, in our tiny beds for the last time, I exclaimed with no small pleasure,
The ocean, with all its indescribable beauty, was no longer surrounding us; we started to feel like our stroll on the quarter-deck was just like a donkey walking in circles on a mill; that our books had lost half their pages, and we had memorized the other half; that our beef was way too salty, and our biscuits were really hard; in short, after studying the good ship Edward from front to back until we knew the name of every sail and the function of every pulley, we were done with her. As we lay down, head to head, in our tiny beds for the last time, I said with great pleasure,
“Tomorrow to fresh fields and pastures new.”
“Tomorrow to new fields and fresh pastures.”
CHAPTER II
New Orleans—Society—Creoles and Quadroons Voyage up the Mississippi
New Orleans—Society—Creoles and Quadroons Trip up the Mississippi
On first touching the soil of a new land, of a new continent, of a new world, it is impossible not to feel considerable excitement and deep interest in almost every object that meets us. New Orleans presents very little that can gratify the eye of taste, but nevertheless there is much of novelty and interest for a newly arrived European. The large proportion of blacks seen in the streets, all labour being performed by them; the grace and beauty of the elegant Quadroons, the occasional groups of wild and savage looking Indians, the unwonted aspect of the vegetation, the huge and turbid river, with its low and slimy shore, all help to afford that species of amusement which proceeds from looking at what we never saw before.
Upon first stepping onto the soil of a new land, a new continent, a new world, it's hard not to feel excitement and a deep curiosity about nearly everything around us. New Orleans doesn't offer much that pleases refined tastes, but there's still plenty that's novel and interesting for a newly arrived European. The large number of Black individuals in the streets, who do all the labor; the grace and beauty of the elegant Quadroon women; the occasional groups of wild-looking Native Americans; the unusual appearance of the vegetation; the massive, muddy river with its low, slimy banks—all contribute to that kind of amusement that comes from seeing things we've never encountered before.
The town has much the appearance of a French Ville de Province, and is, in fact, an old French colony taken from Spain by France. The names of the streets are French, and the language about equally French and English. The market is handsome and well supplied, all produce being conveyed by the river. We were much pleased by the chant with which the Negro boatmen regulate and beguile their labour on the river; it consists but of very few notes, but they are sweetly harmonious, and the Negro voice is almost always rich and powerful.
The town looks a lot like a French provincial town and is actually an old French colony that France took from Spain. The street names are French, and the language spoken is a mix of French and English. The market is nice and well-stocked, with all the produce brought in by the river. We really enjoyed the songs the Black boatmen use to coordinate and pass the time while working on the river; they use just a few notes, but they sound great together, and the Black voices are usually rich and strong.
By far the most agreeable hours I passed at New Orleans were those in which I explored with my children the forest near the town. It was our first walk in “the eternal forests of the western world,” and we felt rather sublime and poetical. The trees, generally speaking, are much too close to be either large or well grown; and, moreover, their growth is often stunted by a parasitical plant, for which I could learn no other name than “Spanish moss;” it hangs gracefully from the boughs, converting the outline of all the trees it hangs upon into that of weeping willows. The chief beauty of the forest in this region is from the luxuriant undergrowth of palmetos, which is decidedly the loveliest coloured and most graceful plant I know. The pawpaw, too, is a splendid shrub, and in great abundance. We here, for the first time, saw the wild vine, which we afterwards found growing so profusely in every part of America, as naturally to suggest the idea that the natives ought to add wine to the numerous production of their plenty-teeming soil. The strong pendant festoons made safe and commodious swings, which some of our party enjoyed, despite the sublime temperament above-mentioned.
By far the most enjoyable hours I spent in New Orleans were those when I explored the forest near the town with my kids. It was our first walk in “the eternal forests of the western world,” and we felt pretty inspired and poetic. The trees are generally too close together to grow large or strong, and their growth is often stunted by a parasitic plant called “Spanish moss.” It hangs down elegantly from the branches, making the outlines of all the trees it covers look like weeping willows. The main beauty of the forest in this area comes from the lush undergrowth of palmettos, which is definitely the most beautifully colored and graceful plant I know. The pawpaw is also a gorgeous shrub and is found in great abundance. Here, for the first time, we saw wild vines, which we later found growing abundantly all over America, leading us to think that the natives should consider adding wine to the many crops from their fertile land. The strong hanging vines made safe and comfortable swings, which some of our group enjoyed, even with the previously mentioned feeling of inspiration.
Notwithstanding it was mid-winter when we were at New Orleans, the heat was much more than agreeable, and the attacks of the mosquitos incessant, and most tormenting; yet I suspect that, for a short time, we would rather have endured it, than not have seen oranges, green peas, and red pepper, growing in the open air at Christmas. In one of our rambles we ventured to enter a garden, whose bright orange hedge attracted our attention; here we saw green peas fit for the table, and a fine crop of red pepper ripening in the sun. A young Negress was employed on the steps of the house; that she was a slave made her an object of interest to us. She was the first slave we had ever spoken to, and I believe we all felt that we could hardly address her with sufficient gentleness. She little dreamed, poor girl, what deep sympathy she excited; she answered us civilly and gaily, and seemed amused at our fancying there was something unusual in red pepper pods; she gave us several of them, and I felt fearful lest a hard mistress might blame her for it. How very childish does ignorance make us! and how very ignorant we are upon almost every subject, where hearsay evidence is all we can get!
Even though it was mid-winter when we were in New Orleans, the heat was much more than pleasant, and the mosquito bites were constant and extremely bothersome; still, I think that for a little while, we would have preferred to endure it rather than not see oranges, green peas, and red peppers growing outdoors at Christmas. During one of our walks, we dared to enter a garden, drawn in by its bright orange hedge; here we found green peas ready for dinner and a great crop of red peppers ripening in the sun. A young Black woman was working on the steps of the house; the fact that she was a slave made her interesting to us. She was the first slave we had ever talked to, and I think we all felt we needed to speak to her with extra kindness. She had no idea, poor girl, how much sympathy she stirred in us; she responded politely and cheerfully, seeming amused by our fascination with the red pepper pods; she gave us several, and I worried that a strict overseer might scold her for it. How childish ignorance makes us! And how ignorant we are about almost everything when all we have is word-of-mouth information!
I left England with feelings so strongly opposed to slavery, that it was not without pain I witnessed its effects around me. At the sight of every Negro man, woman, and child that passed, my fancy wove some little romance of misery, as belonging to each of them; since I have known more on the subject, and become better acquainted with their real situation in America, I have often smiled at recalling what I then felt.
I left England with such strong feelings against slavery that it was painful to see its effects all around me. Every time I saw a Black man, woman, or child, I imagined little stories of suffering related to each of them. Now that I know more about the issue and understand their real situation in America better, I often smile when I think about how I felt back then.
The first symptom of American equality that I perceived, was my being introduced in form to a milliner; it was not at a boarding-house, under the indistinct outline of “Miss C—,” nor in the street through the veil of a fashionable toilette, but in the very penetralia of her temple, standing behind her counter, giving laws to ribbon and to wire, and ushering caps and bonnets into existence. She was an English woman, and I was told that she possessed great intellectual endowments, and much information; I really believe this was true. Her manner was easy and graceful, with a good deal of French tournure; and the gentleness with which her fine eyes and sweet voice directed the movements of a young female slave, was really touching: the way, too, in which she blended her French talk of modes with her customers, and her English talk of metaphysics with her friends, had a pretty air of indifference in it, that gave her a superiority with both.
The first sign of American equality that I noticed was when I was formally introduced to a milliner. It wasn’t at a boarding house, under the vague name of “Miss C—,” nor on the street through the lens of a fashionable outfit, but right in the heart of her shop, standing behind her counter, setting the rules for ribbon and wire, and bringing caps and bonnets to life. She was English, and I was told that she had great intellectual gifts and a lot of knowledge; I genuinely believe that was true. Her demeanor was easy and graceful, with a touch of French flair; and the gentle way her expressive eyes and sweet voice guided the movements of a young female assistant was truly moving. The way she mixed her French fashion talk with her customers and her English discussions on metaphysics with her friends had a charming air of indifference that gave her an edge over both.
I found with her the daughter of a judge, eminent, it was said, both for legal and literary ability, and I heard from many quarters, after I had left New Orleans, that the society of this lady was highly valued by all persons of talent. Yet were I, traveller-like, to stop here, and set it down as a national peculiarity, or republican custom, that milliners took the lead in the best society, I should greatly falsify facts. I do not remember the same thing happening to me again, and this is one instance among a thousand, of the impression every circumstance makes on entering a new country, and of the propensity, so irresistible, to class all things, however accidental, as national and peculiar. On the other hand, however, it is certain that if similar anomalies are unfrequent in America, they are nearly impossible elsewhere.
I met the daughter of a prominent judge, known for both her legal and literary skills, and I heard from many sources, after I left New Orleans, that this lady’s company was highly regarded by all talented people. However, if I were to stop here like a traveler and claim that it’s a national trait or a republican custom for milliners to lead in high society, I would be misrepresenting the facts. I don’t remember experiencing anything like this again, and this is just one example among many of how every situation leaves an impression when entering a new country, and the strong tendency to categorize everything, no matter how coincidental, as national and unique. On the other hand, while such anomalies are uncommon in America, they are almost non-existent anywhere else.
In the shop of Miss C— I was introduced to Mr. M’Clure, a venerable personage, of gentlemanlike appearance, who in the course of five minutes propounded as many axioms, as “Ignorance is the only devil;” “Man makes his own existence;” and the like. He was of the New Harmony school, or rather the New Harmony school was of him. He was a man of good fortune, (a Scotchman, I believe), who after living a tolerably gay life, had “conceived high thoughts, such as Lycurgus loved, who bade flog the little Spartans,” and determined to benefit the species, and immortalize himself, by founding a philosophical school at New Harmony. There was something in the hollow square legislations of Mr. Owen, that struck him as admirable, and he seems, as far as I can understand, to have intended aiding his views, by a sort of incipient hollow square drilling; teaching the young ideas of all he could catch, to shoot into parallelogramic form and order. This venerable philosopher, like all of his school that I ever heard of, loved better to originate lofty imaginings of faultless systems, than to watch their application to practice. With much liberality he purchased and conveyed to the wilderness a very noble collection of books and scientific instruments; but not finding among men one whose views were liberal and enlarged as his own, he selected a woman to put into action the machine he had organized. As his acquaintance with this lady had been of long standing, and, as it was said, very intimate, he felt sure that no violation of his rules would have place under her sway; they would act together as one being: he was to perform the functions of the soul, and will everything; she, those of the body, and perform everything.
In Miss C's shop, I met Mr. M’Clure, an older gentleman with a refined demeanor, who shared several maxims in just five minutes, such as “Ignorance is the only devil” and “Man creates his own existence.” He was part of the New Harmony movement, or rather, it was part of him. He was a well-off man, probably a Scot, who after living quite a lively life had “conceived high thoughts, like those Lycurgus admired who ordered the young Spartans to be disciplined,” and decided to benefit humanity and make a name for himself by starting a philosophical school in New Harmony. He found something remarkable in Mr. Owen's concept of hollow square laws and seemed to intend to support this vision with a kind of preliminary hollow square training, educating the young minds he could reach to organize themselves into orderly shapes. This esteemed philosopher, like everyone I've heard of from his movement, preferred to dream up ideal systems rather than to see them put into practice. Generously, he collected and brought to the wilderness a valuable assortment of books and scientific tools; however, not finding anyone among men whose views matched his own broad perspective, he chose a woman to implement the structure he had established. Since he had known this lady for a long time and, as rumored, had a close relationship with her, he was confident that she would uphold his principles; they would work together as one entity: he would be the soul, controlling everything, while she would be the body, doing all the tasks.
The principal feature of the scheme was, that (the first liberal outfit of the institution having been furnished by Mr. M’Clure,) the expense of keeping it up should be defrayed by the profits arising from the labours of the pupils, male and female, which was to be performed at stated intervals of each day, in regular rotation with learned study and scientific research. But unfortunately the soul of the system found the climate of Indiana uncongenial to its peculiar formation, and, therefore, took its flight to Mexico, leaving the body to perform the operations of both, in whatever manner it liked best; and the body, being a French body, found no difficulty in setting actively to work without troubling the soul about it; and soon becoming conscious that the more simple was a machine, the more perfect were its operations, she threw out all that related to the intellectual part of the business, (which to do poor soul justice, it had laid great stress upon), and stirred herself as effectually as ever body did, to draw wealth from the thews and sinews of the youths they had collected. When last I heard of this philosophical establishment, she, and a nephew-son were said to be reaping a golden harvest, as many of the lads had been sent from a distance by indigent parents, for gratuitous education, and possessed no means of leaving it.
The main aspect of the plan was that, since Mr. M’Clure provided the initial funding for the institution, the ongoing costs would be covered by the earnings from the students, both male and female, who were to work at designated times each day in a regular rotation with their studies and scientific research. Unfortunately, the core of the system found the climate in Indiana unsuitable for its unique structure and thus migrated to Mexico, leaving the rest to handle its functions as it saw fit. Being a French establishment, it had no trouble getting to work without involving the core, and soon realized that the simpler a system was, the more efficiently it operated. So, it discarded everything related to the intellectual side of the operation, which the poor core had emphasized, and worked diligently to extract wealth from the efforts of the young people they had gathered. The last I heard about this philosophical institution, it and a nephew were said to be making a significant profit, as many of the boys had come from afar, sent by struggling parents for free education, and had no way to leave.
Our stay in New Orleans was not long enough to permit our entering into society, but I was told that it contained two distinct sets of people, both celebrated, in their way, for their social meetings and elegant entertainments. The first of these is composed of Creole families, who are chiefly planters and merchants, with their wives and daughters; these meet together, eat together, and are very grand and aristocratic; each of their balls is a little Almack’s, and every portly dame of the set is as exclusive in her principles as the excluded but amiable Quandroons, and such of the gentlemen of the former class as can by any means escape from the high places, where pure Creole blood swells the veins at the bare mention of any being tainted in the remotest degree with the Negro stain.
Our stay in New Orleans was too short to really get involved in the social scene, but I heard that the city has two distinct groups of people, both known for their social gatherings and classy events. The first group consists of Creole families, mainly planters and merchants, along with their wives and daughters. They come together, dine together, and are very elegant and exclusive; each of their balls is like a mini Almack’s, and every prominent lady in this group is as selective in her standards as those amiable Quadroon women who are kept out, along with the men from their group who manage to escape the high-status circles, where pure Creole blood is held in high regard and any hint of African ancestry is looked down upon.
Of all the prejudices I have ever witnessed, this appears to me the most violent, and the most inveterate. Quadroon girls, the acknowledged daughters of wealthy American or Creole fathers, educated with all of style and accomplishments which money can procure at New Orleans, and with all the decorum that care and affection can give; exquisitely beautiful, graceful, gentle, and amiable, these are not admitted, nay, are not on any terms admissable, into the society of the Creole families of Louisiana. They cannot marry; that is to say, no ceremony can render an union with them legal or binding; yet such is the powerful effect of their very peculiar grace, beauty, and sweetness of manner, that unfortunately they perpetually become the objects of choice and affection. If the Creole ladies have privilege to exercise the awful power of repulsion, the gentle Quadroon has the sweet but dangerous vengeance of possessing that of attraction. The unions formed with this unfortunate race are said to be often lasting and happy, as far as any unions can be so, to which a certain degree of disgrace is attached.
Of all the prejudices I've ever seen, this seems to me the most intense and deeply rooted. Quadroon girls, the recognized daughters of wealthy American or Creole fathers, educated with all the style and skills that money can buy in New Orleans, and with all the decorum that care and affection can provide; stunningly beautiful, graceful, gentle, and kind, these girls are not accepted, nor are they in any way allowed, into the society of the Creole families of Louisiana. They cannot marry; that is to say, no ceremony can make a union with them legal or binding; yet, the powerful effect of their unique grace, beauty, and charm means that, unfortunately, they constantly become the objects of desire and affection. If Creole women have the awful power of rejection, the gentle Quadroon has the sweet but dangerous power of attraction. The unions formed with this unfortunate group are said to often be lasting and happy, as far as any unions can be that carry a certain degree of disgrace.
There is a French and an English theatre in the town; but we were too fresh from Europe to care much for either; or, indeed, for any other of the town delights of this city, and we soon became eager to commence our voyage up the Mississippi.
There’s a French theater and an English theater in town, but we were too new to America to really care about either, or any of the other attractions in the city, and we quickly became excited to start our trip up the Mississippi.
Miss Wright, then less known (though the author of more than one clever volume) than she has since become, was the companion of our voyage from Europe; and it was my purpose to have passed some months with her and her sister at the estate she had purchased in Tennessee. This lady, since become so celebrated as the advocate of opinions that make millions shudder, and some half-score admire, was, at the time of my leaving England with her, dedicated to a pursuit widely different from her subsequent occupations. Instead of becoming a public orator in every town throughout America, she was about, as she said, to seclude herself for life in the deepest forests of the western world, that her fortune, her time, and her talents might be exclusively devoted to aid the cause of the suffering Africans. Her first object was to shew that nature had made no difference between blacks and whites, excepting in complexion; and this she expected to prove by giving an education perfectly equal to a class of black and white children. Could this fact be once fully established, she conceived that the Negro cause would stand on firmer ground than it had yet done, and the degraded rank which they have ever held amongst civilized nations would be proved to be a gross injustice.
Miss Wright, who was less known at the time (even though she had already written several clever books) than she is now, was my travel companion from Europe. I had planned to spend some months with her and her sister at the estate she had bought in Tennessee. This lady, who later became famous for championing ideas that make millions uneasy and a few admire, was focused on a very different goal at the time I left England with her. Instead of becoming a public speaker in towns across America, she intended to isolate herself for life in the deepest forests of the western world, dedicating her fortune, time, and talents solely to helping the suffering Africans. Her primary goal was to show that nature had made no distinction between blacks and whites, other than their skin color. She expected to demonstrate this by providing an equal education to a group of black and white children. If she could establish this fact, she believed that the cause of the Negro would be on much firmer ground than it had ever been, and the degraded status they have always held among civilized nations would be proven to be a serious injustice.
This question of the mental equality, or inequality between us, and the Negro race, is one of great interest, and has certainly never yet been fairly tried; and I expected for my children and myself both pleasure and information from visiting her establishment, and watching the success of her experiment.
This issue of mental equality, or inequality, between us and the Black race is really interesting, and it has never been properly tested; I hoped that my children and I would gain both enjoyment and insight from visiting her establishment and observing how her experiment turned out.
The innumerable steam boats, which are the stage coaches and fly waggons of this land of lakes and rivers, are totally unlike any I had seen in Europe, and greatly superior to them. The fabrics which I think they most resemble in appearance, are the floating baths (les bains Vigier) at Paris. The annexed drawing will give a correct idea of their form. The room to which the double line of windows belongs, is a very handsome apartment; before each window a neat little cot is arranged in such a manner as to give its drapery the air of a window curtain. This room is called the gentlemen’s cabin, and their exclusive right to it is somewhat uncourteously insisted upon. The breakfast, dinner, and supper are laid in this apartment, and the lady passengers are permitted to take their meals there.
The countless steamboats, which serve as the stagecoaches and freight wagons of this land of lakes and rivers, are completely different from any I’ve seen in Europe and far better. The ones I think they most closely resemble in appearance are the floating baths (les bains Vigier) in Paris. The attached drawing will give you an accurate idea of their shape. The room connected to the double line of windows is a very nice space; in front of each window, a tidy little cot is arranged to make its drapery look like a window curtain. This room is called the gentlemen’s cabin, and they insist on their exclusive right to it rather rudely. Breakfast, lunch, and dinner are served in this room, and female passengers are allowed to eat there.
On the first of January, 1828, we embarked on board the Belvidere, a large and handsome boat; though not the largest or handsomest of the many which displayed themselves along the wharfs; but she was going to stop at Memphis, the point of the river nearest to Miss Wright’s residence, and she was the first that departed after we had got through the customhouse, and finished our sight-seeing. We found the room destined for the use of the ladies dismal enough, as its only windows were below the stem gallery; but both this and the gentlemen’s cabin were handsomely fitted up, and the former well carpeted; but oh! that carpet! I will not, I may not describe its condition; indeed it requires the pen of a Swift to do it justice. Let no one who wishes to receive agreeable impressions of American manners, commence their travels in a Mississippi steam boat; for myself, it is with all sincerity I declare, that I would infinitely prefer sharing the apartment of a party of well conditioned pigs to the being confined to its cabin.
On January 1, 1828, we boarded the Belvidere, a large and attractive boat; although not the biggest or best-looking among the many that lined the docks. However, it was stopping at Memphis, the closest point on the river to Miss Wright’s home, and it was the first to leave after we got through customs and finished our sightseeing. The room set aside for the ladies was pretty grim, since its only windows were below the front gallery, but both this room and the gentlemen’s cabin were nicely furnished, and the ladies' area was well carpeted; but oh! that carpet! I can’t and won’t describe its state; it truly needs the skill of a Swift to do it justice. Let no one who wants to have a positive impression of American customs start their travels on a Mississippi steamboat; as for me, I sincerely declare that I would much rather share a room with a group of well-behaved pigs than be confined to its cabin.
I hardly know any annoyance so deeply repugnant to English feelings, as the incessant, remorseless spitting of Americans. I feel that I owe my readers an apology for the repeated use of this, and several other odious words; but I cannot avoid them, without suffering the fidelity of description to escape me. It is possible that in this phrase, “Americans,” I may be too general. The United States form a continent of almost distinct nations, and I must now, and always, be understood to speak only of that portion of them which I have seen. In conversing with Americans I have constantly found that if I alluded to anything which they thought I considered as uncouth, they would assure me it was local, and not national; the accidental peculiarity of a very small part, and by no means a specimen of the whole. “That is because you know so little of America,” is a phrase I have listened to a thousand times, and in nearly as many different places. It may be so—and having made this concession, I protest against the charge of injustice in relating what I have seen.
I barely know of any annoyance that is so deeply offensive to English sensibilities as the constant, relentless spitting of Americans. I feel like I owe my readers an apology for repeatedly using this and several other unpleasant words; but I can’t avoid them without sacrificing the accuracy of my description. It's possible that by saying “Americans,” I am being too broad. The United States is made up of nearly distinct nations, and I must clarify now, and always, that I am only referring to the part I have experienced. When talking with Americans, I've consistently found that if I mentioned anything they thought I viewed as rude, they would insist it was local and not representative of the country as a whole; just the random oddity of a very small area, not a reflection of everyone. “That’s because you know so little about America,” is a phrase I’ve heard a thousand times in almost as many different places. That might be true—and having made this acknowledgment, I stand by my account of what I have witnessed.
CHAPTER III
Company on board the Steam Boat—Scenery of the Mississippi—Crocodiles—Arrival at Memphis—Nashoba
Company on board the steam boat—Scenery of the Mississippi—Crocodiles—Arriving in Memphis—Nashoba
The weather was warm and bright, and we found the guard of the boat, as they call the gallery that runs round the cabins, a very agreeable station; here we all sat as long as light lasted, and sometimes wrapped in our shawls, we enjoyed the clear bright beauty of American moonlight long after every passenger but ourselves had retired. We had a full complement of passengers on board. The deck, as is usual, was occupied by the Kentucky flat-boat men, returning from New Orleans, after having disposed of the boat and cargo which they had conveyed thither, with no other labour than that of steering her, the current bringing her down at the rate of four miles an hour. We had about two hundred of these men on board, but the part of the vessel occupied by them is so distinct from the cabins, that we never saw them, except when we stopped to take in wood; and then they ran, or rather sprung and vaulted over each other’s heads to the shore, whence they all assisted in carrying wood to supply the steam engine; the performance of this duty being a stipulated part of the payment of their passage.
The weather was warm and sunny, and we found the guard of the boat, which is the gallery that goes around the cabins, to be a really nice spot; we all sat there as long as there was light, and sometimes wrapped in our shawls, we enjoyed the clear, beautiful American moonlight long after all the other passengers had gone to bed. We had a full load of passengers on board. The deck, as usual, was filled with the Kentucky flat-boat men returning from New Orleans after selling the boat and cargo they had delivered there, with no other work than steering it, since the current brought it down at about four miles an hour. We had around two hundred of these men on board, but the part of the vessel they occupied was so separate from the cabins that we never saw them, except when we stopped to take on wood; then they would run, or rather leap and vault over each other’s heads to the shore, where they all helped carry wood to fuel the steam engine; doing this job was part of the agreement for their passage.
From the account given by a man servant we had on board, who shared their quarters, they are a most disorderly set of persons, constantly gambling and wrangling, very seldom sober, and never suffering a night to pass without giving practical proof of the respect in which they hold the doctrines of equality, and community of property. The clerk of the vessel was kind enough to take our man under his protection, and assigned him a berth in his own little nook; but as this was not inaccessible, he told him by no means to detach his watch or money from his person during the night. Whatever their moral characteristics may be, these Kentuckians are a very noble-looking race of men; their average height considerably exceeds that of Europeans, and their countenances, excepting when disfigured by red hair, which is not unfrequent, extremely handsome.
From the account given by a servant we had on board, who shared their quarters, they are a very rowdy group of people, always gambling and arguing, rarely sober, and never letting a night go by without showing how much they believe in the ideas of equality and shared property. The clerk of the ship kindly took our man under his wing and gave him a spot in his own little nook; however, since it wasn’t completely safe, he advised him not to take off his watch or money during the night. Regardless of their moral qualities, these Kentuckians are a strikingly handsome group of men; their average height is significantly taller than that of Europeans, and their faces, unless marred by red hair—which is not uncommon—are very attractive.
The gentlemen in the cabin (we had no ladies) would certainly neither, from their language, manners, nor appearance, have received that designation in Europe; but we soon found their claim to it rested on more substantial ground, for we heard them nearly all addressed by the titles of general, colonel, and major. On mentioning these military dignities to an English friend some time afterwards, he told me that he too had made the voyage with the same description of company, but remarking that there was not a single captain among them; he made the observation to a fellow-passenger, and asked how he accounted for it. “Oh, sir, the captains are all on deck,” was the reply.
The men in the cabin (we had no women) definitely wouldn't have been called gentlemen in Europe based on their language, manners, or looks; but we soon discovered that their claim to that title had more solid backing, as we heard most of them referred to by the titles of general, colonel, and major. Later, when I mentioned these military titles to an English friend, he told me he had also traveled with the same type of people, noting that there wasn't a single captain among them. He pointed this out to a fellow passenger and asked how to explain it. “Oh, sir, the captains are all on deck,” was the response.
Our honours, however, were not all military, for we had a judge among us. I know it is equally easy and invidious to ridicule the peculiarities of appearance and manner in people of a different nation from ourselves; we may, too, at the same moment, be undergoing the same ordeal in their estimation; and, moreover, I am by no means disposed to consider whatever is new to me as therefore objectionable; but, nevertheless, it was impossible not to feel repugnance to many of the novelties that now surrounded me.
Our honors, however, weren't all military, as we had a judge among us. I know it's just as easy and unfair to make fun of the quirks in appearance and behavior of people from a different country as it is to think that they might be judging us the same way. Also, I'm not at all inclined to dismiss something just because it's new to me. Still, it was hard to ignore my aversion to many of the new things that surrounded me now.
The total want of all the usual courtesies of the table, the voracious rapidity with which the viands were seized and devoured, the strange uncouth phrases and pronunciation; the loathsome spitting, from the contamination of which it was absolutely impossible to protect our dresses; the frightful manner of feeding with their knives, till the whole blade seemed to enter into the mouth; and the still more frightful manner of cleaning the teeth afterwards with a pocket knife, soon forced us to feel that we were not surrounded by the generals, colonels, and majors of the old world; and that the dinner hour was to be any thing rather than an hour of enjoyment.
The complete lack of common table manners, the greedy speed with which the food was grabbed and eaten, the strange, awkward phrases and pronunciations; the disgusting spitting, which made it impossible to keep our clothes clean; the terrifying way they ate with their knives, as if the whole blade was going into their mouths; and the even more horrifying way they cleaned their teeth afterward with a pocket knife, quickly made us realize we were not among the generals, colonels, and majors of the old world; and that dinner was definitely not going to be an enjoyable time.
The little conversation that went forward while we remained in the room, was entirely political, and the respective claims of Adams and Jackson to the presidency were argued with more oaths and more vehemence than it had ever been my lot to hear. Once a colonel appeared on the verge of assaulting a major, when a huge seven-foot Kentuckian gentleman horse-dealer, asked of the heavens to confound them both, and bade them sit still and be d—d. We too thought we should share this sentence; at least sitting still in the cabin seemed very nearly to include the rest of it, and we never tarried there a moment longer than was absolutely necessary to eat.
The brief conversation that took place while we were in the room was entirely about politics, and the arguments over Adams and Jackson's claims to the presidency were filled with more curses and intensity than I had ever heard before. At one point, a colonel almost attacked a major when a massive seven-foot Kentucky horse dealer asked for the heavens to curse them both and told them to sit down and shut up. We felt we might end up with the same fate; at least, staying put in the cabin seemed to imply the rest of that, and we never stayed there a moment longer than absolutely needed to eat.
The unbroken flatness of the banks of the Mississippi continued unvaried for many miles above New Orleans; but the graceful and luxuriant palmetto, the dark and noble ilex, and the bright orange, were every where to be seen, and it was many days before we were weary of looking at them. We occasionally used the opportunity of the boat’s stopping to take in wood for a ten minutes’ visit to the shore; we in this manner explored a field of sugar canes, and loaded ourselves with as much of the sweet spoil as we could carry. Many of the passengers seemed fond of the luscious juice that is easily expressed from the canes, but it was too sweet for my palate. We also visited, in the same rapid manner, a cotton plantation. A handsome spacious building was pointed out to us as a convent, where a considerable number of young ladies were educated by the nuns.
The flat banks of the Mississippi stretched endlessly for many miles above New Orleans; however, the elegant and lush palmettos, the dark and impressive ilex trees, and the vibrant oranges were everywhere in sight, and it took many days before we grew tired of looking at them. We occasionally took advantage of the boat stopping to load up on wood, using those ten minutes to visit the shore; during this time, we explored a field of sugarcane and filled ourselves with as much of the sweet treat as we could carry. Many of the passengers seemed to enjoy the sugary juice that is easily extracted from the canes, but it was too sweet for my taste. We also quickly visited a cotton plantation. A beautiful, spacious building was pointed out to us as a convent, where a significant number of young ladies were educated by nuns.
At one or two points the wearisome level line of forest is relieved by bluffs, as they call the short intervals of high ground. The town of Natches is beautifully situated on one of these high spots; the climate here, in the warm season, is as fatal as that of New Orleans; were it not for this, Natches would have great attractions to new settlers. The beautiful contrast that its bright green hill forms with the dismal line of black forest that stretches on every side, the abundant growth of pawpaw, palmetto and orange, the copious variety of sweet-scented flowers that flourish there, all make it appear like an oasis in the desert. Natches is the furthest point to the north at which oranges ripen in the open air, or endure the winter without shelter. With the exception of this sweet spot, I thought all the little towns and villages we passed, wretched looking, in the extreme. As the distance from New Orleans increased, the air of wealth and comfort exhibited in its immediate neighbourhood disappeared, and but for one or two clusters of wooden houses, calling themselves towns, and borrowing some pompous name, generally from Greece or Rome, we might have thought ourselves the first of the human race who had ever penetrated into this territory of bears and alligators. But still from time to time appeared the hut of the wood-cutter, who supplies the steam-boats with fuel, at the risk, or rather with the assurance of early death, in exchange for dollars and whiskey. These sad dwellings are nearly all of them inundated during the winter, and the best of them are constructed on piles, which permit the water to reach its highest level without drowning the wretched inhabitants. These unhappy beings are invariably the victims of ague, which they meet recklessly, sustained by the incessant use of ardent spirits. The squalid look of the miserable wives and children of these men was dreadful, and often as the spectacle was renewed I could never look at it with indifference. Their complexion is of a blueish white, that suggests the idea of dropsy; this is invariable, and the poor little ones wear exactly the same ghastly hue. A miserable cow and a few pigs standing knee-deep in water, distinguish the more prosperous of these dwellings, and on the whole I should say that I never witnessed human nature reduced so low, as it appeared in the wood-cutters’ huts on the unwholesome banks of the Mississippi.
At one or two points, the monotonous line of forest is interrupted by bluffs, which are the short stretches of higher ground. The town of Natches is beautifully located on one of these elevated areas; the climate here during the warm season is as deadly as that of New Orleans. If it weren't for this, Natches would be very appealing to new settlers. The striking contrast between its bright green hill and the gloomy stretch of black forest surrounding it, the abundant growth of pawpaw, palmetto, and orange trees, and the wide variety of sweet-smelling flowers that thrive here all make it look like an oasis in the desert. Natches is the farthest point north where oranges ripen in the open air and survive the winter without shelter. Aside from this lovely spot, I thought all the small towns and villages we passed looked extremely miserable. As we moved further from New Orleans, the air of wealth and comfort visible in its immediate area vanished, and except for a few clusters of wooden houses that called themselves towns, often borrowing some grand name from Greece or Rome, we might have thought we were the first humans to venture into this land of bears and alligators. Yet, now and then, we would see the hut of a woodcutter supplying fuel to the steamboats, risking, or rather being assured of, an early death in exchange for money and whiskey. These sad homes are mostly flooded during the winter, and the best ones are built on stilts that allow the water to rise without drowning the unfortunate residents. These unhappy people are almost always afflicted by ague, which they face recklessly, relying on the constant use of strong liquor. The squalid appearance of the poor wives and children of these men was horrifying, and even though I saw it repeatedly, I could never look at it without feeling something. Their skin has a bluish-white tone that suggests dropsy; this is constant, and the poor little ones have exactly the same ghastly hue. A miserable cow and a few pigs standing in knee-deep water are signs of the more prosperous of these homes, and overall, I would say that I have never seen human nature reduced to such a low state as it was in the woodcutters’ huts along the unhealthy banks of the Mississippi.
It is said that at some points of this dismal river, crocodiles are so abundant as to add the terror of their attacks to the other sufferings of a dwelling there. We were told a story of a squatter, who having “located” himself close to the river’s edge, proceeded to build his cabin. This operation is soon performed, for social feeling and the love of whiskey bring all the scanty neighbourhood round a new corner, to aid him in cutting down trees, and in rolling up the logs, till the mansion is complete. This was done; the wife and five young children were put in possession of their new home, and slept soundly after a long march. Towards daybreak the husband and father was awakened by a faint cry, and looking up, beheld relics of three of his children scattered over the floor, and an enormous crocodile, with several young ones around her, occupied in devouring the remnants of their horrid meal. He looked round for a weapon, but finding none, and aware that unarmed he could do nothing, he raised himself gently on his bed, and contrived to crawl from thence through a window, hoping that his wife, whom he left sleeping, might with the remaining children rest undiscovered till his return. He flew to his nearest neighbour and besought his aid; in less than half an hour two men returned with him, all three well armed; but alas! they were too late! the wife and her two babes lay mangled on their bloody bed. The gorged reptiles fell an easy prey to their assailants, who, upon examining the place, found the hut had been constructed close to the mouth of a large hole, almost a cavern, where the monster had hatched her hateful brood.
It is said that in some spots along this grim river, crocodiles are so plentiful that their attacks add to the other hardships of living there. We heard a story about a squatter who, after “claiming” a spot near the riverbank, set out to build his cabin. This task is completed quickly because community spirit and a love for whiskey bring the few neighbors around to help him chop down trees and roll the logs, until the house is ready. This was done; his wife and five young children moved into their new home and slept soundly after a long journey. At dawn, the husband and father was woken by a faint cry, and looking up, he saw the remains of three of his children scattered on the floor, while a massive crocodile, with several young ones around her, was busy devouring the remnants of their horrific meal. He looked for a weapon but found none, realizing that unarmed he could do nothing, so he quietly got up from his bed and managed to crawl out through a window, hoping that his wife, who he left sleeping, and the other children would stay hidden until he returned. He rushed to his nearest neighbor and asked for help; in less than half an hour, two men came back with him, all three well-armed; but sadly, they were too late! The wife and her two babies lay mutilated on their bloody bed. The well-fed reptiles easily fell prey to their attackers, who, upon examining the area, discovered that the hut had been built right by the entrance of a large hole, almost a cave, where the creature had birthed her monstrous brood.
Among other sights of desolation which mark this region, condemned of nature, the lurid glare of a burning forest was almost constantly visible after sunset, and when the wind so willed, the smoke arising from it floated in heavy vapour over our heads. Not all the novelty of the scene, not all its vastness, could prevent its heavy horror wearying the spirits. Perhaps the dinners and suppers I have described may help to account for this; but certain it is, that when we had wondered for a week at the ceaseless continuity of forest; had first admired, and then wearied of the festooned drapery of Spanish moss; when we had learned to distinguish the different masses of timber that passed us, or that we passed, as a “snag,” a “log” or a “sawyer;” when we had finally made up our minds that the gentlemen of the Kentucky and Ohio military establishments, were not of the same genus as those of the Tuilleries and St. James’s, we began to wish that we could sleep more hours away. As we advanced to the northward we were no longer cheered by the beautiful border of palmettos; and even the amusement of occasionally spying out a sleeping crocodile was over.
Among other signs of desolation in this nature-condemned region, the fiery glow of a burning forest was almost always visible after sunset, and when the wind allowed, smoke would drift in thick clouds over our heads. Not all the novelty of the scene, nor its vastness, could stop the heavy dread from wearing us down. Perhaps the dinners and suppers I’ve mentioned account for this; but it’s clear that after a week of marveling at the endless forest, first admiring and then tiring of the draped Spanish moss, and coming to recognize the different types of timber that floated by us, whether a “snag,” a “log,” or a “sawyer,” we concluded that the gentlemen from the Kentucky and Ohio military posts were not of the same kind as those from the Tuilleries and St. James’s. We began to wish for more hours of sleep. As we moved northward, the lovely border of palmettos no longer cheered us, and the fun of occasionally spotting a sleeping crocodile had worn off.
Just in this state, when we would have fain believed that every mile we went, carried us two towards Memphis, a sudden and violent shock startled us frightfully.
Just at this moment, when we would have happily believed that every mile we traveled brought us closer to Memphis, a sudden and intense jolt shocked us badly.
“It is a sawyer!” said one.
“It’s a carpenter!” said one.
“It is a snag!” cried another.
“It’s a problem!” shouted another.
“We are aground!” exclaimed the captain.
“We're trapped!” exclaimed the captain.
“Aground? Good heavens! and how long shall we stay here?”
“Aground? Oh my goodness! How long are we going to be stuck here?”
“The Lord in his providence can only tell, but long enough to tire my patience, I expect.”
“The Lord in His wisdom can only reveal so much, but I’ve been waiting long enough to test my patience, I guess.”
And the poor English ladies, how fared they the while?
And how were the poor English ladies doing all this time?
Two breakfasts, two dinners, and a supper did they eat, with the Ohio and Kentucky gentlemen, before they moved an inch. Several steam-boats passed while we were thus enthralled; but some were not strong enough to attempt drawing us off, and some attempted it, but were not strong enough to succeed; at length a vast and mighty “thing of life” approached, threw out grappling irons; and in three minutes the business was done; again we saw the trees and mud slide swiftly past us; and a hearty shout from every passenger on deck declared their joy.
They had two breakfasts, two dinners, and a supper with the Ohio and Kentucky guys before they moved at all. Several steamboats passed by while we were stuck there; some weren’t powerful enough to try to pull us away, and others tried but couldn’t succeed. Finally, a huge, powerful “thing of life” came up, threw out grappling hooks, and in three minutes it was all done; we saw the trees and mud rush by us again, and a loud cheer from every passenger on deck showed their excitement.
At length we had the pleasure of being told that we had arrived at Memphis; but this pleasure was considerably abated by the hour of our arrival, which was midnight, and by the rain, which was falling in torrents.
At last, we were informed that we had reached Memphis; however, our excitement was greatly diminished by the late hour of our arrival, which was midnight, and by the heavy rain pouring down.
Memphis stands on a high bluff, and at the time of our arrival was nearly inaccessible. The heavy rain which had been falling for many hours would have made any steep ascent difficult, but unfortunately a new road had been recently marked out, which beguiled us into its almost bottomless mud, from the firmer footing of the unbroken cliff. Shoes and gloves were lost in the mire, for we were glad to avail ourselves of all our limbs, and we reached the grand hotel in a most deplorable state.
Memphis is situated on a high bluff, and when we got there, it was almost impossible to reach. The heavy rain that had been pouring for hours made any steep climb challenging, but a new road had just been laid out, luring us into its seemingly endless mud instead of the solid ground of the unbroken cliff. Our shoes and gloves got stuck in the mess, and we were grateful to use all our limbs to navigate it. We arrived at the grand hotel in a very sorry state.
Miss Wright was well known there, and as soon as her arrival was announced, every one seemed on the alert to receive her, and we soon found ourselves in possession of the best rooms in the hotel. The house was new, and in what appeared to me a very comfortless condition, but I was then new to Western America, and unaccustomed to their mode of “getting along,” as they term it. This phrase is eternally in use among them, and seems to mean existing with as few of the comforts of life as possible.
Miss Wright was well-known there, and as soon as her arrival was announced, everyone seemed ready to welcome her. We quickly ended up with the best rooms in the hotel. The place was new and felt quite uncomfortable to me, but I was new to Western America and not used to their way of “getting along,” as they call it. This phrase is always used by them and seems to mean living with as few comforts as possible.
We slept soundly however, and rose in the hope of soon changing our mortar-smelling-quarters for Miss Wright’s Nashoba.
We slept deeply, though, and woke up looking forward to soon trading our mortar-smelling place for Miss Wright’s Nashoba.
But we presently found that the rain which had fallen during the night would make it hazardous to venture through the forests of Tennessee in any sort of carriage; we therefore had to pass the day at our queer comfortless hotel. The steam-boat had wearied me of social meals, and I should have been thankful to have eaten our dinner of hard venison and peach-sauce in a private room; but this, Miss Wright said was impossible; the lady of the house would consider the proposal as a personal affront, and, moreover, it would be assuredly refused. This latter argument carried weight with it, and when the great bell was sounded from an upper window of the house, we proceeded to the dining-room. The table was laid for fifty persons, and was already nearly full. Our party had the honour of sitting near “the lady,” but to check the proud feelings to which such distinction might give birth, my servant, William, sat very nearly opposite to me. The company consisted of all the shop-keepers (store-keepers as they are called throughout the United States) of the little town. The mayor also, who was a friend of Miss Wright’s, was of the party; he is a pleasing gentlemanlike man, and seems strangely misplaced in a little town on the Mississippi. We were told that since the erection of this hotel, it has been the custom for all the male inhabitants of the town to dine and breakfast there. They ate in perfect silence, and with such astonishing rapidity that their dinner was over literally before our’s was began; the instant they ceased to eat, they darted from the table in the same moody silence which they had preserved since they entered the room, and a second set took their places, who performed their silent parts in the same manner. The only sounds heard were those produced by the knives and forks, with the unceasing chorus of coughing, &c. No women were present except ourselves and the hostess; the good women of Memphis being well content to let their lords partake of Mrs. Anderson’s turkeys and venison, (without their having the trouble of cooking for them), whilst they regale themselves on mash and milk at home.
But we soon realized that the rain that fell overnight would make it risky to travel through the forests of Tennessee in any kind of carriage; so, we had to spend the day at our odd and uncomfortable hotel. The steam boat had worn me out from social meals, and I would have been grateful to have our dinner of tough venison and peach sauce in a private room; however, Miss Wright said this was impossible; the lady of the house would take such a suggestion as a personal insult, and, moreover, it would definitely be turned down. This last point carried some weight, and when the big bell rang from an upper window of the house, we went to the dining room. The table was set for fifty people and was already almost full. Our group had the privilege of sitting near “the lady,” but to temper the pride that such distinction might evoke, my servant, William, sat almost opposite me. The guests consisted of all the shopkeepers (storekeepers as they are called throughout the United States) of the small town. The mayor, who was a friend of Miss Wright’s, was also part of the group; he is a charming gentleman and seems oddly out of place in a small town on the Mississippi. We were told that since this hotel opened, all the men in the town have the custom of eating their dinners and breakfasts there. They ate in complete silence, and so quickly that their dinner was literally over before ours even began; as soon as they finished eating, they dashed from the table in the same brooding silence they had maintained since entering the room, and a second group took their places, performing their silent roles in the same way. The only sounds heard were from the knives and forks, along with the constant chorus of coughing, etc. No women were present except for us and the hostess; the good women of Memphis were quite content to let their husbands enjoy Mrs. Anderson’s turkeys and venison (without having to cook for them), while they indulged themselves with mush and milk at home.
The remainder of the day passed pleasantly enough in rambling round the little town, which is situated at the most beautiful point of the Mississippi; the river is here so wide as to give it the appearance of a noble lake; an island, covered with lofty forest trees divides it, and relieves by its broad mass of shadow the uniformity of its waters. The town stretches in a rambling irregular manner along the cliff, from the Wolf River, one of the innumerable tributaries to the Mississippi, to about a mile below it. Half a mile more of the cliff beyond the town is cleared of trees, and produces good pasture for horses, cows, and pigs; sheep they had none. At either end of this space the forest again rears its dark wall, and seems to say to man, “so far shalt thou come, and no farther!” Courage and industry, however, have braved the warning. Behind this long street the town straggles back into the forest, and the rude path that leads to the more distant log dwellings becomes wilder at every step. The ground is broken by frequent water-courses, and the bridges that lead across them are formed by trunks of trees thrown over the stream, which support others of smaller growth, that are laid across them. These bridges are not very pleasant to pass, for they totter under the tread of a man, and tremble most frightfully beneath a horse or a waggon; they are, however, very picturesque. The great height of the trees, the quantity of pendant vine branches that hang amongst them; and the variety of gay plumaged birds, particularly the small green parrot, made us feel we were in a new world; and a repetition of our walk the next morning would have pleased us well, but Miss Wright was anxious to get home, and we were scarcely less so to see her Nashoba. A clumsy sort of caravan drawn by two horses was prepared for us; and we set off in high spirits for an expedition of fifteen miles through the forest. To avoid passing one of the bridges above described, which was thought insecure, our negro driver took us through a piece of water, which he assured us was not deep “to matter” however we soon lost sight of our pole, and as we were evidently descending, we gently remonstrated with him on the danger of proceeding, but he only grinned, and flogged in reply; we soon saw the front wheels disappear, and horses began to plunge and kick most alarmingly, but still without his looking at all disturbed. At length the splinter-bar gave way, upon which the black philosopher said very composedly, “I expect you’ll best be riding out upon the horses, as we’ve got into an unhandsome fix here.” Miss Wright, who sat composedly smiling at the scene, said, “Yes, Jacob, that is what we must do;” and with some difficulty we, in this manner, reached the shore, and soon found ourselves again assembled round Mrs. Anderson’s fire.
The rest of the day went pretty well as we wandered around the little town, which is located at the most picturesque spot on the Mississippi. Here, the river is so wide it looks like a stunning lake; an island, covered in tall trees, splits the river and provides shade that breaks up the monotony of the water. The town extends haphazardly along the cliff, from the Wolf River, one of the many streams that feed the Mississippi, to about a mile downstream. Another half-mile of cleared land beyond the town offers good grazing for horses, cows, and pigs; however, they had no sheep. At both ends of this open space, the forest rises up like a dark barrier, seeming to say to humans, “you can only go this far!” Yet, determination and hard work have pushed back against that warning. Behind this winding street, the town spreads back into the woods, and the rough path leading to the distant log cabins becomes increasingly wild with each step. The ground is uneven, marked by streams, and the bridges over them are made from tree trunks laid across the water, supporting smaller branches on top. These bridges aren’t very stable, wobbling under a person’s weight and shaking terribly with a horse or wagon; still, they look quite charming. The towering trees, the numerous hanging vines, and the colorful birds, especially the little green parrot, made us feel like we were in a whole new world; repeating our walk the next morning would have been nice, but Miss Wright was eager to get home, and we were equally eager to see her Nashoba. A rickety caravan pulled by two horses was ready for us, and we set off happily for a fifteen-mile trek through the forest. To avoid crossing one of the aforementioned unstable bridges, our black driver took us through a shallow water crossing that he assured us would be fine. However, we soon lost sight of our pole, and as we clearly began going downhill, we gently protested about the risk of continuing, but he just grinned and whipped the horses in response. Before long, the front wheels vanished under the water, and the horses started to buck and kick in a panic, yet he appeared completely unfazed. Eventually, the splinter-bar broke, and the driver calmly remarked, “I guess you’ll have to ride out on the horses, as we’ve gotten ourselves into a bit of trouble here.” Miss Wright, who sat there smiling at the chaos, said, “Yes, Jacob, that’s what we must do;” and with some effort, we managed to reach the shore, soon finding ourselves back gathered around Mrs. Anderson’s fire.
It was soon settled that we must delay our departure till the waters had subsided, but Miss Wright was too anxious to reach home to endure this delay and she set off again on horseback, accompanied by our man servant, who told me afterwards that they rode through places that might have daunted the boldest hunter, but that “Miss Wright took it quite easy.”
It was quickly agreed that we needed to postpone our departure until the waters had gone down, but Miss Wright was too eager to get home to handle this wait. She set off again on horseback, accompanied by our male servant, who later told me that they rode through areas that would have intimidated the boldest hunter, but that “Miss Wright took it all in stride.”
The next day we started again, and the clear air, the bright sun, the novel wildness of the dark forest, and our keenly awakened curiosity, made the excursion delightful, and enabled us to bear without shrinking the bumps and bruises we encountered. We soon lost all trace of a road, at least so it appeared to us, for the stumps of the trees, which had been cut away to open a passage, were left standing three feet high. Over these, the high-hung Deerborn, as our carriage was called, passed safely; but it required some miles of experience to convince us that every stump would not be our last; it was amusing to watch the cool and easy skill with which the driver wound his horses and wheels among these stumps. I thought he might have been imported to Bond street with great advantage. The forest became thicker and more dreary-looking every mile we advanced, but our ever-grinning negro declared it was a right good road, and that we should be sure to get to Nashoba.
The next day we set off again, and the fresh air, bright sun, the unique wildness of the dark forest, and our heightened curiosity made the trip enjoyable and allowed us to handle the bumps and bruises we faced without complaint. We quickly lost all signs of a road, or at least it seemed that way to us, because the stumps of the trees that had been cut to create a path were still standing about three feet high. The high-riding Deerborn, as our carriage was called, navigated over these stumps without any issues; however, it took us a few miles to realize that not every stump would be our downfall. It was quite entertaining to see how skillfully the driver maneuvered his horses and the carriage around these obstacles. I thought he could have easily been a hit on Bond Street. The forest grew denser and more gloomy with every mile we traveled, but our ever-smiling African American companion insisted it was a perfectly good road and that we would definitely reach Nashoba.
And so we did….and one glance sufficed to convince me that every idea I had formed of the place was as far as possible from the truth. Desolation was the only feeling—the only word that presented itself; but it was not spoken. I think, however, that Miss Wright was aware of the painful impression the sight of her forest home produced on me, and I doubt not that the conviction reached us both at the same moment, that we had erred in thinking that a few months passed together at this spot could be productive of pleasure to either. But to do her justice, I believe her mind was so exclusively occupied by the object she had then in view, that all things else were worthless, or indifferent to her. I never heard or read of any enthusiasm approaching her’s, except in some few instances, in ages past, of religious fanaticism.
And so we did….and one look was enough to make me realize that everything I thought about the place was completely wrong. Desolation was the only feeling I had—the only word that came to mind; but I didn’t say it out loud. I believe Miss Wright noticed the painful impression her forest home had on me, and I'm sure we both realized at the same time that we had made a mistake thinking a few months spent here could bring joy to either of us. However, to give her credit, I think her mind was so focused on her current goal that everything else seemed worthless or unimportant to her. I’ve never heard or read of any enthusiasm that matched hers, except for a few instances of religious fanatical devotion from long ago.
It must have been some feeling equally powerful which enabled Miss Wright, accustomed to all the comfort and refinement of Europe, to imagine not only that she herself could exist in this wilderness, but that her European friends could enter there, and not feel dismayed at the savage aspect of the scene. The annexed plate gives a faithful view of the cleared space and buildings which form the settlement. Each building consisted of two large rooms furnished in the most simple manner; nor had they as yet collected round them any of those minor comforts which ordinary minds class among the necessaries of life. But in this our philosophical friend seemed to see no evil; nor was there any mixture of affectation in this indifference; it was a circumstance really and truly beneath her notice. Her whole heart and soul were occupied by the hope of raising the African to the level of European intellect; and even now, that I have seen this favourite fabric of her imagination fall to pieces beneath her feet, I cannot recall the self-devotion with which she gave herself to it, without admiration.
It must have been some equally strong feeling that allowed Miss Wright, used to all the comforts and refinements of Europe, to believe not only that she could live in this wilderness, but that her European friends could come here and not feel overwhelmed by the harshness of the surroundings. The attached image shows an accurate view of the cleared area and buildings that make up the settlement. Each building had two large rooms furnished in the simplest way; they hadn't yet gathered any of those small comforts that ordinary people consider essential to life. But our philosophical friend seemed to see no problem with this; there was no pretentiousness in her indifference; it was truly something she didn't care about. Her entire heart and soul were focused on the hope of elevating Africans to the level of European intellect; and even now, as I see this dream of hers crumble beneath her, I can’t help but admire the dedication she poured into it.
The only white persons we found at Nashoba were my amiable friend, Mrs. W—, the sister of Miss Wright, and her husband. I think they had between thirty and forty slaves, including children, but when I was there no school had been established. Books and other materials for the great experiment had been collected, and one or two professors engaged, but nothing was yet organized. I found my friend Mrs. W— in very bad health, which she confessed she attributed to the climate. This naturally so much alarmed me for my children, that I decided upon leaving the place with as little delay as possible, and did so at the end of ten days.
The only white people we found at Nashoba were my friendly acquaintance, Mrs. W—, the sister of Miss Wright, and her husband. I believe they had between thirty and forty slaves, including children, but when I was there, no school had been set up. They had gathered books and other materials for the big experiment, and a professor or two had been hired, but nothing was organized yet. I found my friend Mrs. W— in very poor health, which she admitted was due to the climate. This understandably concerned me greatly for my children, so I decided to leave the place as quickly as possible, and I did so after ten days.
I do not exactly know what was the immediate cause which induced Miss Wright to abandon a scheme which had taken such possession of her imagination, and on which she had expended so much money; but many months had not elapsed before I learnt, with much pleasure, that she and her sister had also left it. I think it probable that she became aware upon returning to Nashoba, that the climate was too hostile to their health. All I know farther of Nashoba is, that Miss Wright having found (from some cause or other) that it was impossible to pursue her object, herself accompanied her slaves to Hayti, and left them there, free, and under the protection of the President.
I’m not really sure what made Miss Wright give up on a project that had captured her imagination and cost her so much money; however, it wasn’t long before I happily learned that she and her sister had decided to leave it behind as well. I think it’s likely that when she returned to Nashoba, she realized the climate was too harsh for their health. The only other thing I know about Nashoba is that Miss Wright discovered, for some reason, that she couldn’t continue with her plans, so she personally took her slaves to Hayti and left them there, free and under the protection of the President.
I found no beauty in the scenery round Nashoba, nor can I conceive that it would possess any even in summer. The trees were so close to each other as not to permit the growth of underwood, the great ornament of the forest at New Orleans, and still less of our seeing any openings, where the varying effects of light and shade might atone for the absence of other objects. The clearing round the settlement appeared to me inconsiderable and imperfect; but I was told that they had grown good crops of cotton and Indian corn. The weather was dry and agreeable, and the aspects of the heavens by night surprisingly beautiful. I never saw moonlight so clear, so pure, so powerful.
I saw no beauty in the scenery around Nashoba, and I can’t imagine it would be any better in the summer. The trees were so close together that there was no room for underbrush, which is such a beautiful part of the forests in New Orleans, and we couldn't even see any clearings where the changing light and shadows could make up for the lack of other sights. The area around the settlement seemed small and incomplete to me; however, I was told they had good harvests of cotton and corn. The weather was dry and pleasant, and the night sky was surprisingly beautiful. I had never seen moonlight so clear, pure, and strong.
We returned to Memphis on the 26th January, 1828, and found ourselves obliged to pass five days there, awaiting a steam-boat for Cincinnati, to which metropolis of the west, I was now determined to proceed with my family to await the arrival of Mr. Trollope. We were told by everyone we spoke to at Memphis, that it was in all respects the finest situation west of the Alleghanies. We found many lovely walks among the broken forest glades around Memphis, which, together with a morning and evening enjoyment of the effects of a glowing horizon on the river, enabled us to wait patiently for the boat that was to bear us away.
We returned to Memphis on January 26, 1828, and found ourselves needing to stay there for five days, waiting for a steamboat to Cincinnati. I was now set on going to that major city in the west with my family to wait for Mr. Trollope's arrival. Everyone we talked to in Memphis said it was the best place west of the Alleghanies in every way. We discovered many beautiful walks among the scattered forest clearings around Memphis, and the enjoyment of the stunning sunrises and sunsets on the river helped us wait patiently for the boat that would take us away.
CHAPTER IV
Departure from Memphis—Ohio River Louisville—Cincinnati
Memphis to Cincinnati via Louisville
On the 1st of February, 1828, we embarked on board the Criterion, and once more began to float on the “father of waters,” as the poor banished Indians were wont to call the Mississippi. The company on board was wonderfully like what we had met in coming from New Orleans; I think they must have all been first cousins; and what was singular, they too had all arrived at high rank in the army. For many a wearisome mile above the Wolf River the only scenery was still forest—forest—forest; the only variety was produced by the receding of the river at some points, and its encroaching on the opposite shore. These changes are continually going on, but from what cause none could satisfactorily explain to me. Where the river is encroaching, the trees are seen growing in the water many feet deep; after some time, the water undermines their roots, and they become the easy victims of the first hurricane that blows. This is one source of the immense quantities of drift wood that float into the gulf of Mexico. Where the river has receded, a young growth of cane-brake is soon seen starting up with the rapid vegetation of the climate; these two circumstances in some degree relieve the sameness of the thousand miles of vegetable wall. But we were now approaching the river which is emphatically called “the beautiful,” La Belle Riveriere of the New Orleans French; and a few days took us, I trust for ever, out of that murky stream which is as emphatically called “the deadly;” and well does it seem to merit the title; the air of its shores is mephitic, and it is said that nothing that ever sunk beneath its muddy surface was known to rise again. As truly does “La Belle Rivière” deserve its name; the Ohio is bright and clear; its banks are continually varied, as it flows through what is called a rolling country, which seems to mean a district that cannot .shew a dozen paces of level ground at a time. The primaeval forest still occupies a considerable portion of the ground, and hangs in solemn grandeur from the cliffs; but it is broken by frequent settlements, where we were cheered by the sight of herds and flocks. I imagine that this river presents almost every variety of river scenery; sometimes its clear wave waters a meadow of level turf; sometimes it is bounded by perpendicular rocks; pretty dwellings, with their gay porticos are seen, alternately with wild intervals of forest, where the tangled bear-brake plainly enough indicates what inhabitants are native there. Often a mountain torrent comes pouring its silver tribute to the stream, and were there occasionally a ruined abbey, or feudal castle, to mix the romance of real life with that of nature, the Ohio would be perfect.
On February 1, 1828, we boarded the Criterion and set off once again on the “father of waters,” as the unfortunate displaced Indians used to call the Mississippi. The people on board were remarkably similar to those we had met coming from New Orleans; I think they must have all been first cousins, and interestingly, they too had attained high ranks in the army. For many tiresome miles above the Wolf River, the only view was endless forest—forest—forest; the only change came from the river either receding at some points or creeping onto the opposite shore. These shifts are constantly happening, but no one could adequately explain the cause to me. Where the river is encroaching, trees are seen growing in water several feet deep; eventually, the water undermines their roots, making them easy targets for the first hurricane that hits. This is one reason for the massive quantities of driftwood that float into the Gulf of Mexico. Where the river has pulled back, young shoots of cane quickly emerge due to the rapid plant growth in the climate; these two situations somewhat break the monotony of the thousand miles of green wall. But we were now approaching the river that is proudly called “the beautiful,” La Belle Rivière by the French of New Orleans; a few days took us away, I hope forever, from that murky river known as “the deadly;” and it truly seems to earn that name; the air along its shores is foul, and it’s said that nothing that sinks below its muddy surface ever resurfaces. In contrast, “La Belle Rivière” truly deserves its title; the Ohio is bright and clear, its banks constantly changing as it flows through what’s known as a rolling country, which seems to imply an area that cannot show more than a dozen steps of flat ground at once. The ancient forest still covers a significant portion of the land, majestically hanging from the cliffs; yet it is interrupted by frequent settlements, where we were delighted by the sight of herds and flocks. I believe this river showcases nearly every kind of river scenery; at times, its clear waters wash over a meadow of flat turf; at other times, it is bordered by sheer rocks; charming homes, with their lively porches, appear alternately with wild stretches of forest, where the tangled underbrush clearly indicates the native wildlife. Often, a mountain stream pours its silver contributions into the river, and if there were occasionally a ruined abbey or feudal castle to blend the romance of real life with that of nature, the Ohio would be perfect.
So powerful was the effect of this sweet scenery, that we ceased to grumble at our dinners and suppers; nay, we almost learnt to rival our neighbours at table in their voracious rapidity of swallowing, so eager were we to place ourselves again on the guard, lest we might lose sight of the beauty that was passing away from us.
The impact of this beautiful scenery was so strong that we stopped complaining about our dinners and suppers; in fact, we nearly matched our neighbors at the table in their rapid eating, so eager were we to be back on guard, afraid we might miss out on the beauty that was slipping away from us.
Yet these fair shores are still unhealthy. More than once we landed, and conversed with the families of the wood-cutters, and scarcely was there one in which we did not hear of some member who had “lately died of the fever.”—They are all subject to ague, and though their dwellings are infinitely better than those on the Mississippi, the inhabitants still look like a race that are selling their lives for gold.
Yet these beautiful shores are still unhealthy. More than once we landed and talked with the families of the wood-cutters, and hardly did we find one where we didn’t hear about someone who had “recently died of the fever.” They are all prone to fever, and even though their homes are much better than those along the Mississippi, the people still seem like a group selling their lives for gold.
Louisville is a considerable town, prettily situated on the Kentucky, or south side of the Ohio; we spent some hours in seeing all it had to shew; and had I not been told that a bad fever often rages there during the warm season, I should have liked to pass some months there for the purpose of exploring the beautiful country in its vicinity. Frankfort and Lexington are both towns worth visiting, though from their being out of the way places, I never got to either. The first is the seat of the state government of Kentucky, and the last is, I was told, the residence of several independent families, who, with more leisure than is usually enjoyed in America, have its natural accompaniment, more refinement.
Louisville is a significant city, beautifully located on the Kentucky side of the Ohio River; we spent several hours exploring everything it has to offer. Had I not been warned about a severe fever that often spreads there during the warmer months, I would have enjoyed spending a few months there to discover the stunning countryside nearby. Frankfort and Lexington are both worth visiting, but since they're somewhat off the beaten path, I never made it to either. The former is the seat of Kentucky's state government, and I heard that the latter is home to several independent families who, with more leisure than is typically found in America, have a bit more refinement.
The falls of the Ohio are about a mile below Louisville, and produce a rapid, too sudden for the boats to pass, except in the rainy season. The passengers are obliged to get out below them, and travel by land to Louisville, where they find other vessels ready to receive them for the remainder of the voyage. We were spared this inconvenience by the water being too high for the rapid to be much felt, and it will soon be altogether removed by the Louisville canal coming into operation, which will permit the steam-boats to continue their progress from below the falls to the town.
The Ohio River's falls are just about a mile downstream from Louisville and create a rapid that's too intense for boats to navigate, except during the rainy season. Passengers have to disembark below the falls and travel by land to Louisville, where other boats are available for the rest of the journey. We were fortunate to avoid this hassle because the water was high enough that the rapid wasn’t too strong, and soon, the Louisville canal will be operational, allowing steam boats to make their way from below the falls directly to the town.
The scenery on the Kentucky side is much finer than on that of Indiana, or Ohio. The State of Kentucky was the darling spot of many tribes of Indians, and was reserved among them as a common hunting ground; it is said that they cannot yet name it without emotion, and that they have a sad and wild lament that they still chaunt to its memory. But their exclusion thence is of no recent date; Kentucky has been longer settled than the Illinois, Indiana, or Ohio, and it appears not only more highly cultivated, but more fertile and more picturesque than either. I have rarely seen richer pastures than those of Kentucky. The forest trees, where not too crowded, are of magnificent growth, and the crops are gloriously abundant where the thriftless husbandry has not worn out the soil by an unvarying succession of exhausting crops. We were shewn ground which had borne abundant crops of wheat for twenty successive years; but a much shorter period suffices to exhaust the ground, if it were made to produce tobacco without the intermission of some other crop.
The scenery on the Kentucky side is much more beautiful than that of Indiana or Ohio. Kentucky was a cherished area for many Native American tribes, and they treated it as a shared hunting ground; it’s said they still can’t mention it without feeling emotional, and they have a sorrowful song they continue to sing in its memory. However, their exclusion from the land isn’t a recent issue; Kentucky has been settled for longer than Illinois, Indiana, or Ohio, and not only does it seem more cultivated, but it’s also more fertile and picturesque than any of those states. I have seldom seen pastures as rich as those in Kentucky. The forest trees, when not overcrowded, grow magnificently, and where poor farming hasn’t depleted the soil through a constant cycle of exhausting crops, the harvests are incredibly abundant. We were shown land that had yielded plentiful wheat crops for twenty consecutive years; however, a much shorter time is enough to exhaust the land if it is used solely for tobacco without planting any other crops in between.
We reached Cincinnati on the 10th of February. It is finely situated on the south side of a hill that rises gently from the water’s edge; yet it is by no means a city of striking appearance; it wants domes, towers, and steeples; but its landing-place is noble, extending for more than a quarter of a mile; it is well paved, and surrounded by neat, though not handsome buildings. I have seen fifteen steam-boats lying there at once, and still half the wharf was unoccupied.
We got to Cincinnati on February 10th. It’s nicely located on the south side of a hill that gently slopes up from the water's edge; however, it’s not a city that stands out much; it lacks domes, towers, and steeples; but its landing area is impressive, stretching over a quarter of a mile; it’s well paved and surrounded by tidy, though not particularly attractive buildings. I’ve seen fifteen steamboats docked there at the same time, and still half of the wharf was empty.
On arriving we repaired to the Washington Hotel, and thought ourselves fortunate when we were told that we were just in time for dinner at the table d’hôte; but when the dining-room door was opened, we retreated with a feeling of dismay at seeing between sixty and seventy men already at table. We took our dinner with the females of the family, and then went forth to seek a house for our permanent accommodation.
Upon arrival, we went to the Washington Hotel and felt lucky when we were told we had just in time for dinner at the table d'hôte; but when the dining-room door opened, we stepped back, dismayed to see around sixty or seventy men already seated. We had our dinner with the women of the family, and then we set out to find a house for our long-term stay.
We went to the office of an advertising agent, who professed to keep a register of all such information, and described the dwelling we wanted. He made no difficulty, but told us his boy should be our guide through the city, and shew us what we sought; we accordingly set out with him, and he led us up one street, and down another, but evidently without any determinate object; I therefore stopped, and asked him whereabout the houses were which we were going to see. “I am looking for bills,” was his reply.
We went to an advertising agent's office, who claimed to have a record of all that info, and described the place we wanted. He didn’t hesitate at all, saying his assistant would guide us around the city to show us what we were looking for. So we set off with him, and he took us up one street and down another, but it was clear he didn’t have a specific goal in mind. I stopped and asked him where the houses we were supposed to see were. “I’m looking for advertisements,” he replied.
I thought we could have looked for bills as well without him, and I told him so; upon which he assumed an air of great activity, and began knocking regularly at every door we passed, enquiring if the house was to be let. It was impossible to endure this long, and our guide was dismissed, though I was afterwards obliged to pay him a dollar for his services.
I thought we could have looked for places to rent without him, and I told him so; at which point he started acting really busy and began knocking on every door we passed, asking if the house was for rent. It was impossible to keep this up for long, so we let our guide go, though I later had to pay him a dollar for his services.
We had the good fortune, however, to find a dwelling before long, and we returned to our hotel, having determined upon taking possession of it as soon at it could be got ready. Not wishing to take our evening meal either with the three score and ten gentlemen of the dining-room, nor yet with the half dozen ladies of the bar-room, I ordered tea in my own chamber. A good-humoured Irish woman came forward with a sort of patronising manner, took my hand, and said, “Och, my honey, ye’ll be from the old country. I’ll see you will have your tay all to yourselves, honey.” With this assurance we retired to my room, which was a handsome one as to its size and bed furniture, but it had no carpet, and was darkened by blinds of paper, such as rooms are hung with, which required to be rolled up, and then fastened with strings very awkwardly attached to the window-frames, whenever light or air were wished for. I afterwards met with these same uncomfortable blinds in every part of America.
We were lucky to find a place soon, so we went back to our hotel, ready to move in as soon as it was prepared. Not wanting to have dinner with the seventy gentlemen in the dining room or the half-dozen ladies in the bar, I ordered tea in my own room. A cheerful Irish woman approached me in a slightly patronizing way, took my hand, and said, “Oh, my dear, you must be from the old country. I’ll make sure you have your tea all to yourselves, dear.” With that promise, we went to my room, which was nicely sized with good furniture, but it didn’t have a carpet and was shaded by paper blinds that needed to be rolled up and awkwardly tied with strings whenever we wanted light or fresh air. I later encountered those same uncomfortable blinds everywhere in America.
Our Irish friend soon reappeared, and brought us tea, together with the never failing accompaniments of American tea drinking, hung beef, “chipped up” raw, and sundry sweetmeats of brown sugar hue and flavour. We took our tea, and were enjoying our family talk, relative to our future arrangements, when a loud sharp knocking was heard at our door. My “come in,” was answered by the appearance of a portly personage, who proclaimed himself our landlord.
Our Irish friend quickly came back and brought us tea, along with the usual snacks that go with American tea drinking: dried beef, sliced raw, and various sweet treats that were brown in color and flavor. We were sipping our tea and enjoying our family conversation about our future plans when we heard a loud, sharp knock at the door. My "come in" was answered by a stout person who introduced himself as our landlord.
“Are any of you ill?” he began.
“Are any of you sick?” he started.
“No thank you, sir; we are all quite well,” was my reply.
“No thanks, sir; we’re all doing just fine,” was my reply.
“Then, madam, I must tell you, that I cannot accommodate you on these terms; we have no family tea-drinkings here, and you must live either with me or my wife, or not at all in my house.”
“Then, ma'am, I have to tell you that I can't agree to these terms; we don't have family tea-drinkings here, and you have to live with either me or my wife, or not at all in my house.”
This was said with an air of authority that almost precluded reply, but I ventured a sort of apologistic hint, that we were strangers and unaccustomed to the manners of the country.
This was said with an air of authority that almost shut down any response, but I took a chance and offered a somewhat apologetic hint that we were newcomers and not used to the customs of the area.
“Our manners are very good manners, and we don’t wish any changes from England.”
“Our manners are very good, and we don’t want any changes from England.”
I thought of mine host of the Washington afterwards, when reading Scott’s “Anne of Geierstein;” he, in truth, strongly resembled the inn keeper therein immortalized, who made his guests eat, drink, and sleep, just where, when, and how he pleased. I made no farther remonstrance, but determined to hasten my removal. This we achieved the next day to our great satisfaction.
I thought about the host of the Washington later, while reading Scott’s “Anne of Geierstein;” he really reminded me of the innkeeper in that story, who made his guests eat, drink, and sleep exactly when and how he wanted. I didn’t object any further, but decided to speed up my exit. We managed to do that the next day, and it was a great relief.
We were soon settled in our new dwelling, which looked neat and comfortable enough, but we speedily found that it was devoid of nearly all the accommodation that Europeans conceive necessary to decency and comfort. No pump, no cistern, no drain of any kind, no dustman’s cart, or any other visible means of getting rid of the rubbish, which vanishes with such celerity in London, that one has no time to think of its existence; but which accumulated so rapidly at Cincinnati, that I sent for my landlord to know in what manner refuse of all kinds was to be disposed of.
We quickly settled into our new home, which seemed tidy and cozy enough, but we soon realized it lacked almost all the amenities that Europeans consider essential for comfort and decency. No pump, no water tank, no drainage system, no garbage truck, or any other clear way to get rid of trash, which disappears so quickly in London that you barely have time to acknowledge it; but here in Cincinnati, it piled up so fast that I called my landlord to ask how we were supposed to dispose of all kinds of waste.
“Your Help will just have to fix them all into the middle of the street, but you must mind, old woman, that it is the middle. I expect you don’t know as we have got a law what forbids throwing such things at the sides of the streets; they must just all be cast right into the middle, and the pigs soon takes them off.”
“Your Help will have to put them all in the middle of the street, but you need to pay attention, old woman, that it’s the middle. I assume you don’t know that we have a law that prohibits tossing stuff on the sides of the streets; they all have to be thrown right into the middle, and the pigs will soon take them away.”
In truth the pigs are constantly seen doing Herculean service in this way through every quarter of the city; and though it is not very agreeable to live surrounded by herds of these unsavoury animals, it is well they are so numerous, and so active in their capacity of scavengers, for without them the streets would soon be choked up with all sorts of substances in every stage of decomposition.
In reality, the pigs are always busy doing hard work like this all over the city; and while it's not very pleasant to live around groups of these unpleasant animals, it's a good thing they are so plentiful and so effective as garbage collectors, because without them the streets would quickly get filled up with all kinds of waste in various stages of decay.
We had heard so much of Cincinnati, its beauty, wealth, and unequalled prosperity, that when we left Memphis to go thither, we almost felt the delight of Rousseau’s novice, “un voyage à faire, et Paris au bout!” —As soon, therefore, as our little domestic arrangements were completed, we set forth to view this “wonder of the west” this “prophet’s gourd of magic growth,”—this “infant Hercules;” and surely no travellers ever paraded a city under circumstances more favourable to their finding it fair to the sight. Three dreary months had elapsed since we had left the glories of London behind us; for nearly the whole of that time we beheld no other architecture than what our ship and steam-boats had furnished, and excepting at New Orleans, had seen hardly a trace of human habitations. The sight of bricks and mortar was really refreshing, and a house of three stories looked splendid. Of this splendour we saw repeated specimens, and moreover a brick church, which, from its two little peaked spires, is called the two-horned church. But, alas! the flatness of reality after the imagination has been busy! I hardly know what I expected to find in this city, fresh risen from the bosom of the wilderness, but certainly it was not a little town, about the size of Salisbury, without even an attempt at beauty in any of its edifices, and with only just enough of the air of a city to make it noisy and bustling. The population is greater than the appearance of the town would lead one to expect. This is partly owing to the number of free Negroes who herd together in an obscure part of the city, called little Africa; and partly to the density of the population round the paper-mills and other manufactories. I believe the number of inhabitants exceeds twenty thousand.
We had heard so much about Cincinnati—its beauty, wealth, and unmatched prosperity—that when we left Memphis to head there, we almost felt the excitement of Rousseau’s novice, “a journey to take, and Paris at the end!” So as soon as we finished our little domestic arrangements, we set out to see this “wonder of the west,” this “prophet’s gourd of magic growth,” this “infant Hercules.” Surely no travelers ever entered a city under circumstances more favorable for finding it beautiful. Three long months had gone by since we left the glories of London behind; for nearly all that time, we saw no other architecture than what our ship and steam-boats provided, and except for New Orleans, hardly any sign of human habitats. The sight of bricks and mortar was genuinely refreshing, and a three-story house looked amazing. We saw several instances of this splendor, along with a brick church, known as the two-horned church because of its two little peaked spires. But, unfortunately, reality felt so flat after the excitement of imagination! I can’t say what I expected to find in this city, just emerging from the wilderness, but it certainly wasn’t a small town, about the size of Salisbury, with no attempts at beauty in any of its buildings and just enough of a city vibe to make it noisy and busy. The population is larger than what the town’s appearance would suggest. This is partly because of the number of free Black people who gather in a lesser-known part of the city, called Little Africa, and partly due to the dense population around the paper mills and other factories. I believe the number of inhabitants exceeds twenty thousand.
We arrived in Cincinnati in February, 1828, and I speak of the town as it was then; several small churches have been built since, whose towers agreeably relieve its uninteresting mass of buildings. At that time I think Main street, which is the principal avenue, (and runs through the whole town, answering to the High street of our old cities), was the only one entirely paved. The troittoir is of brick, tolerably well laid, but it is inundated by every shower, as Cincinnati has no drains whatever. What makes this omission the more remarkable is, that the situation of the place is calculated both to facilitate their construction and render them necessary. Cincinnati is built on the side of a hill that begins to rise at the river’s edge, and were it furnished with drains of the simplest arrangement, the heavy showers of the climate would keep them constantly clean; as it is, these showers wash the higher streets, only to deposit their filth in the first level spot; and this happens to be in the street second in importance to Main street, running at right angles to it, and containing most of the large warehouses of the town. This deposit is a dreadful nuisance, and must be productive of miasma during the hot weather.
We arrived in Cincinnati in February 1828, and I'm describing the town as it was back then; several small churches have been built since, and their towers provide a nice contrast to the otherwise dull buildings. At that time, I believe Main Street, which is the main road (and runs through the entire town, similar to High Street in our older cities), was the only street that was fully paved. The sidewalk is made of brick, reasonably well laid, but it gets flooded with every rain shower, as Cincinnati has no drainage systems at all. What makes this lack even more surprising is that the location is ideal for building them and makes them necessary. Cincinnati is built on the side of a hill that starts rising right at the river's edge, and if it had even the simplest drains, the heavy rain showers would keep them clear; as it stands, these showers wash the higher streets only to leave their debris in the first flat area, which is on the next important street that runs perpendicular to Main Street and has most of the town's large warehouses. This accumulation is a terrible nuisance and likely causes unhealthy air during the hot weather.
The town is built, as I believe most American towns are, in squares, as they call them; but these squares are the reverse of our’s, being solid instead of hollow. Each consists, or is intended to consist, when the plan of the city is completed, of a block of buildings fronting north, east, west, and south; each house communicating with an alley, furnishing a back entrance. This plan would not be a bad one were the town properly drained, but as it is, these alleys are horrible abominations, and must, I conceive, become worse with every passing year.
The town is laid out, like I believe most American towns are, in squares; but these squares are the opposite of ours, being solid instead of open. Each one is designed, or is supposed to be designed, when the city's plan is finished, as a block of buildings facing north, east, west, and south; each house connects to an alley, providing a back entrance. This layout wouldn’t be so bad if the town were properly drained, but as it stands, these alleys are terrible messes and I think they’ll only get worse with each passing year.
To the north, Cincinnati is bounded by a range of forest-covered hills, sufficiently steep and rugged to prevent their being built upon, or easily cultivated, but not sufficiently high to command from their summits a view of any considerable extent. Deep and narrow water-courses, dry in summer, but bringing down heavy streams in winter, divide these hills into many separate heights, and this furnishes the only variety the landscape offers for many miles round the town. The lovely Ohio is a beautiful feature wherever it is visible, but the only part of the city that has the advantage of its beauty is the street nearest to its bank. The hills of Kentucky, which rise at about the same distance from the river, on the opposite side, form the southern boundary to the basin in which Cincinnati is built.
To the north, Cincinnati is bordered by a range of forested hills, steep and rugged enough to prevent development or easy farming, but not tall enough to offer a wide view from their peaks. Deep, narrow streams that are dry in the summer but carry heavy flows in the winter split these hills into several separate heights, providing the only variation in the landscape for many miles around the city. The beautiful Ohio River is a stunning feature wherever it can be seen, but only the street closest to its bank enjoys its beauty. The hills of Kentucky, rising at a similar distance from the river on the opposite side, form the southern edge of the basin in which Cincinnati is located.
On first arriving, I thought the many tree covered hills around, very beautiful, but long before my departure, I felt so weary of the confined view, that Salisbury Plain would have been an agreeable variety. I doubt if any inhabitant of Cincinnati ever mounted these hills so often as myself and my children; but it was rather for the enjoyment of a freer air than for any beauty of prospect, that we took our daily climb. These hills afford neither shrubs nor flowers, but furnish the finest specimens of millepore in the world; and the water courses are full of fossil productions.
When I first arrived, I thought the many tree-covered hills around were extremely beautiful, but long before I left, I became so tired of the limited view that Salisbury Plain would have been a refreshing change. I doubt any resident of Cincinnati has climbed these hills as often as my children and I did; however, it was more for the pleasure of enjoying the fresh air than for the landscape that we made our daily trek. These hills don’t have any shrubs or flowers, but they do provide some of the best millepore specimens in the world, and the waterways are filled with fossilized remains.
The forest trees are neither large nor well grown, and so close as to be nearly knotted together at top; even the wild vine here loses its beauty, for its graceful festoons bear leaves only when they reach the higher branches of the tree that supports them, both air and light being too scantily found below to admit of their doing more than climbing with a bare stem till they reach a better atmosphere. The herb we call pennyroyal was the only one I found in abundance, and that only on the brows, where the ground had been partially cleared; vegetation is impossible elsewhere, and it is this circumstance which makes the “eternal forests” of America so detestable. Near New Orleans the undergrowth of Palmetto and pawpaw is highly beautiful, but in Tennessee, Indiana, and Ohio, I never found the slightest beauty in the forest scenery. Fallen trees in every possible stage of decay, and congeries of leaves that have been rotting since the flood, cover the ground and infect the air. The beautiful variety of foliage afforded by evergreens never occurs, and in Tennessee, and that part of Ohio that surrounds Cincinnati, even the sterile beauty of rocks is wanting. On crossing the water to Kentucky the scene is greatly improved; beech and chestnut, of magnificent growth, border the beautiful river; the ground has been well cleared, and the herbage is excellent; the pawpaw grows abundantly, and is a splendid shrub, though it bears neither fruit nor flowers so far north. The noble tulip tree flourishes here, and blooms profusely.
The trees in the forest aren't very big or well-shaped, and they're so close together that they almost tangle at the tops; even the wild vine here loses its charm because its elegant tendrils only have leaves when they reach the higher branches of the trees that hold them up. The air and light are too limited below for them to do more than climb with a bare stem until they reach a better atmosphere. The only herb I found in abundance was pennyroyal, and that was only on the slopes where the ground had been partially cleared; plants can't thrive anywhere else, which is what makes America's "eternal forests" so unpleasant. Near New Orleans, the undergrowth of palmettos and pawpaws is quite beautiful, but in Tennessee, Indiana, and Ohio, I never found any beauty in the forest scenery at all. Fallen trees at every stage of decay and piles of leaves that have been rotting since the flood cover the ground and taint the air. The lovely variety of foliage provided by evergreens is non-existent, and in Tennessee and the part of Ohio around Cincinnati, even the bare beauty of rocks is missing. When I crossed the water to Kentucky, the scene improved dramatically; magnificent beech and chestnut trees line the beautiful river. The ground has been well cleared, and the vegetation is excellent; the pawpaw grows abundantly and is a stunning shrub, although it doesn’t bear fruit or flowers this far north. The grand tulip tree thrives here and blooms profusely.
The river Licking flows into the Ohio nearly opposite Cincinnati; it is a pretty winding stream, and two or three miles from its mouth has a brisk rapid, dancing among white stones, which, in the absence of better rocks, we found very picturesque.
The Licking River flows into the Ohio almost directly across from Cincinnati; it's a charming, winding stream, and two or three miles from its mouth, there's a lively rapid, dancing over white stones, which, lacking more impressive rocks, we found quite picturesque.
CHAPTER V
Cincinnati—Forest Farm—Mr. Bullock
Cincinnati—Forest Farm—Mr. Bullock
Though I do not quite sympathise with those who consider Cincinnati as one of the wonders of the earth, I certainly think it a city of extraordinary size and importance, when it is remembered that thirty years ago the aboriginal forest occupied the ground where it stands; and every month appears to extend its limits and its wealth.
Though I don't fully agree with those who view Cincinnati as one of the wonders of the world, I definitely believe it's a city of remarkable size and significance, especially when you consider that thirty years ago, the native forest covered the land where it now stands; and every month it seems to expand its boundaries and its wealth.
Some of the native political economists assert that this rapid conversion of a bear-brake into a prosperous city, is the result of free political institutions; not being very deep in such matters, a more obvious cause suggested itself to me, in the unceasing goad which necessity applies to industry in this country, and in the absence of all resource for the idle. During nearly two years that I resided in Cincinnati, or its neighbourhood, I neither saw a beggar, nor a man of sufficient fortune to permit his ceasing his efforts to increase it; thus every bee in the hive is actively employed in search of that honey of Hybla, vulgarly called money; neither art, science, learning, nor pleasure can seduce them from its pursuit. This unity of purpose, backed by the spirit of enterprise, and joined with an acuteness and total absence of probity, where interest is concerned, which might set canny Yorkshire at defiance, may well go far towards obtaining its purpose.
Some local political economists claim that the quick transformation of a struggling area into a thriving city is due to free political systems. However, I think a more obvious reason is the constant pressure that necessity places on workers in this country, combined with the complete lack of options for those who are lazy. During the almost two years I lived in Cincinnati or nearby, I never saw a beggar or anyone wealthy enough to stop striving for more. So, every worker is busy searching for that sweet reward, commonly referred to as money; neither art, science, education, nor leisure can distract them from this pursuit. This shared goal, driven by entrepreneurial spirit and a sharp focus that completely disregards ethics when it comes to self-interest, could easily lead to success.
The low rate of taxation, too, unquestionably permits a more rapid accumulation of individual wealth than with us; but till I had travelled through America, I had no idea how much of the money collected in taxes returns among the people, not only in the purchase of what their industry furnishes, but in the actual enjoyment of what is furnished. Were I an English legislator, instead of sending sedition to the Tower, I would send her to make a tour of the United States. I had a little leaning towards sedition myself when I set out, but before I had half completed my tour I was quite cured.
The low tax rate definitely allows for a quicker accumulation of individual wealth than in our country; however, until I traveled through America, I had no idea how much of the money collected in taxes actually gets returned to the people, not just through the purchase of goods produced by their labor, but also in the actual enjoyment of those goods. If I were an English lawmaker, instead of sending those stirring up trouble to the Tower, I would send them to take a trip around the United States. I had a bit of sympathy for rebellion myself when I started, but by the time I was halfway through my trip, I was completely cured.
I have read much of the “few and simple wants of rational man,” and I used to give a sort of dreamy acquiescence to the reasoning that went to prove each added want an added woe. Those who reason in a comfortable London drawing-room know little about the matter. Were the aliments which sustain life all that we wanted, the faculties of the hog might suffice us; but if we analyze an hour of enjoyment, we shall find that it is made up of agreeable sensations occasioned by a thousand delicate impressions on almost as many nerves; where these nerves are sluggish from never having been awakened, external objects are less important, for they are less perceived; but where the whole machine of the human frame is in full activity, where every sense brings home to consciousness its touch of pleasure or of pain, then every object that meets the senses is important as a vehicle of happiness or misery. But let no frames so tempered visit the United States, or if they do, let it be with no longer pausing than will store the memory with images, which, by the force of contrast, shall sweeten the future.
I’ve read a lot about the “few and simple wants of rational man,” and I used to sort of dreamily accept the logic that each additional want brings more suffering. Those who reason in a cozy London living room know very little about the issue. If the foods that sustain life were all we wanted, the abilities of a pig might be enough for us; but if we take a closer look at an hour of enjoyment, we’ll find it consists of pleasant sensations triggered by countless subtle impressions on almost as many nerves. When these nerves are dull from never being stimulated, external objects matter less because they’re less noticed; but when the entire human body is fully engaged, and every sense brings pleasure or pain to our awareness, then every object we encounter becomes significant as a source of happiness or misery. However, let no individuals with such temperaments come to the United States, or if they do, let their stay be just long enough to fill their memories with images that, by the power of contrast, will enhance their future experiences.
“Guarda e passa (e poi) ragioniam di lor.”
“Look and move on (and then) let’s talk about them.”
The “simple” manner of living in Western America was more distasteful to me from its levelling effects on the manners of the people, than from the personal privations that it rendered necessary; and yet, till I was without them, I was in no degree aware of the many pleasurable sensations derived from the little elegancies and refinements enjoyed by the middle classes in Europe. There were many circumstances, too trifling even for my gossiping pages, which pressed themselves daily and hourly upon us, and which forced us to remember painfully that we were not at home. It requires an abler pen than mine to trace the connection which I am persuaded exists between these deficiencies and the minds and manners of the people. All animal wants are supplied profusely at Cincinnati, and at a very easy rate; but, alas! these go but a little way in the history of a day’s enjoyment. The total and universal want of manners, both in males and females, is so remarkable, that I was constantly endeavouring to account for it. It certainly does not proceed from want of intellect. I have listened to much dull and heavy conversation in America, but rarely to any that I could strictly call silly, (if I except the every where privileged class of very young ladies). They appear to me to have clear heads and active intellects; are more ignorant on subjects that are only of conventional value, than on such as are of intrinsic importance; but there is no charm, no grace in their conversation. I very seldom during my whole stay in the country heard a sentence elegantly turned, and correctly pronounced from the lips of an American. There is always something either in the expression or the accent that jars the feelings and shocks the taste.
The "simple" way of living in Western America bothered me more because of how it flattened the social behaviors of the people than because of the personal sacrifices it required. Yet, I didn’t fully realize the many enjoyable experiences that come from the little comforts and refinements enjoyed by the middle class in Europe until I was without them. There were many details too minor even for my gossiping pages that constantly reminded us painfully that we weren't at home. It would take a better writer than I to connect these shortcomings to the attitudes and behaviors of the people. In Cincinnati, all basic needs are met abundantly and at a low cost; however, that hardly contributes to a day’s enjoyment. The complete lack of manners in both men and women is so noticeable that I was always trying to understand it. It definitely isn’t due to a lack of intellect. I’ve heard plenty of dull and heavy conversations in America, but rarely any that I would specifically call silly (except for the universally privileged class of very young ladies). They seem to have clear minds and active thinking; they know more about things that are only conventionally valuable than about those of real importance, but their conversations lack charm and grace. During my entire time in the country, I hardly ever heard a sentence that was elegantly phrased and correctly pronounced by an American. There’s always something in the expression or the accent that disrupts feelings and offends the taste.
I will not pretend to decide whether man is better or worse off for requiring refinement in the manners and customs of the society that surrounds him, and for being incapable of enjoyment without them; but in America that polish which removes the coarser and rougher parts of our nature is unknown and undreamed of. There is much substantial comfort, and some display in the larger cities; in many of the more obvious features they are as Paris or as London, being all large assemblies of active and intelligent human beings—but yet they are wonderfully unlike in nearly all their moral features. Now God forbid that any reasonable American, (of whom there are so many millions), should ever come to ask me what I mean; I should find it very difficult, nay, perhaps, utterly impossible, to explain myself; but, on the other hand, no European who has visited the Union, will find the least difficulty in understanding me. I am in no way competent to judge of the political institutions of America; and if I should occasionally make an observation on their effects, as they meet my superficial glance, they will be made in the spirit, and with the feeling of a woman, who is apt to tell what her first impressions may be, but unapt to reason back from effects to their causes. Such observations, if they be unworthy of much attention, are also obnoxious to little reproof: but there are points of national peculiarity of which women may judge as ably as men,—all that constitutes the external of society may be fairly trusted to us.
I won't pretend to decide if people are better or worse off for needing refinement in the manners and customs of the society around them, and for being unable to enjoy life without it; but in America, that polish that smooths out the rougher parts of our nature is unknown and unimaginable. There is a lot of genuine comfort, and some showiness in the larger cities; in many obvious ways, they're like Paris or London, being large gatherings of active and intelligent people—but still, they are remarkably different in almost all their moral aspects. Now God forbid that any reasonable American, (and there are so many millions), should ever come to ask me what I mean; I would find it very difficult, maybe even impossible, to explain myself; but, on the other hand, no European who has visited the United States will find it at all hard to understand me. I'm not in any way qualified to judge America's political institutions; and if I sometimes make a comment on their effects, based on my superficial observations, it will be in the spirit and with the feelings of a woman, who tends to share her first impressions but struggles to connect effects back to their causes. Such comments, if they don’t deserve much attention, are also unlikely to face much criticism: but there are aspects of national uniqueness that women can judge just as well as men—all that makes up the outward aspects of society can be fairly entrusted to us.
Captain Hall, when asked what appeared to him to constitute the greatest difference between England and America, replied, like a gallant sailor, “the want of loyalty.” Were the same question put to me, I should answer, “the want of refinement.”
Captain Hall, when asked what he thought was the biggest difference between England and America, replied, like a brave sailor, “the lack of loyalty.” If the same question were asked of me, I would say, “the lack of refinement.”
Were Americans, indeed, disposed to assume the plain unpretending deportment of the Switzer in the days of his picturesque simplicity, (when, however, he never chewed tobacco), it would be in bad taste to censure him; but this is not the case. Jonathan will be a fine gentleman, but it must be in his own way. Is he not a free-born American? Jonathan, however, must remember, that if he will challenge competition with the old world, the old world will now and then look out to see how he supports his pretensions.
Were Americans really willing to adopt the simple, unassuming behavior of the Swiss during their picturesque times, (when, by the way, they didn't chew tobacco), it wouldn’t be appropriate to criticize him; but that’s not the case. Jonathan will be a true gentleman, but it has to be in his own way. Isn't he a free-born American? However, Jonathan must remember that if he wants to compete with the old world, the old world will occasionally check to see how he upholds his claims.
With their hours of business, whether judicial or mercantile, civil or military, I have nothing to do; I doubt not they are all spent wisely and profitably; but what are their hours of recreation? Those hours that with us are passed in the enjoyment of all that art can win from nature; when, if the elaborate repast be more deeply relished than sages might approve, it is redeemed from sensuality by the presence of elegance and beauty. What is the American pendant to this? I will not draw any comparisons between a good dinner party in the two countries; I have heard American gentlemen say, that they could perceive no difference between them; but in speaking of general manners, I may observe, that it is rarely they dine in society, except in taverns and boarding houses. Then they eat with the greatest possible rapidity, and in total silence; I have heard it said by American ladies, that the hours of greatest enjoyment to the gentlemen were those in which a glass of gin cocktail, or egging, receives its highest relish from the absence of all restraint whatever; and when there were no ladies to trouble them.
With their hours of business, whether in court, trade, civil service, or military affairs, I have nothing to do with; I have no doubt they spend them wisely and productively. But what about their leisure time? Those hours that we enjoy experiencing all that art can offer from nature; when a lavish meal, even if it’s savored a bit more than the philosophers would suggest, is elevated from mere indulgence by the presence of elegance and beauty. What is the American equivalent of this? I won’t compare a dinner party in both countries; I’ve heard American men say they can’t see any difference at all. However, in discussing general customs, I can note that they rarely dine in social settings, except in pubs and boarding houses. When they do, they eat as quickly as possible and in complete silence. I’ve heard American women say that the moments of greatest enjoyment for the men are those when they can savor a gin cocktail or eggnog without any restraint and without any women to bother them.
Notwithstanding all this, the country is a very fine country, well worth visiting for a thousand reasons; nine hundred and ninety-nine of these are reasons founded on admiration and respect; the thousandth is, that we shall feel the more contented with our own. The more unlike a country through which we travel is to all we have left, the more we are likely to be amused; every thing in Cincinnati had this newness, and I should have thought it a place delightful to visit, but to tarry there was not to feel at home.
Despite all this, the country is truly a great place, worth visiting for a thousand reasons; nine hundred and ninety-nine of these are based on admiration and respect; the thousandth is that it makes us feel more content with our own. The more different a country we travel through is from what we’ve left behind, the more amused we are likely to be; everything in Cincinnati had this freshness, and I would have thought it a wonderful place to visit, but staying there didn’t feel like home.
My home, however, for a time it was to be. We heard on every side, that of all the known places on “the globe called earth,” Cincinnati was the most favourable for a young man to settle in; and I only awaited the arrival of Mr. T. to fix our son there, intending to continue with him till he should feel himself sufficiently established. We accordingly determined upon making ourselves as comfortable as possible. I took a larger house, which, however, I did not obtain without considerable difficulty, as, notwithstanding fourteen hundred new dwellings had been erected the preceding year, the demand for houses greatly exceeded the supply. We became acquainted with several amiable people, and we beguiled the anxious interval that preceded Mr. T.’s joining us by frequent excursions in the neighbourhood, which not only afforded us amusement, but gave us an opportunity of observing the mode of life of the country people.
My home, however, was meant to be temporary. We heard from all sides that out of all the known places on “the globe called earth,” Cincinnati was the best spot for a young man to settle down. I was just waiting for Mr. T. to arrive so we could settle our son there, planning to stay with him until he felt established. As a result, we decided to make ourselves as comfortable as possible. I rented a bigger house, which was not easy to find because, despite fourteen hundred new homes being built the previous year, the demand for houses far outstripped the supply. We met several nice people, and we passed the anxious time before Mr. T.’s arrival with frequent trips around the neighborhood, which not only entertained us but also let us observe the local way of life.
We visited one farm, which interested us particularly from its wild and lonely situation, and from the entire dependence of the inhabitants upon their own resources. It was a partial clearing in the very heart of the forest. The house was built on the side of a hill, so steep that a high ladder was necessary to enter the front door, while the back one opened against the hill side; at the foot of this sudden eminence ran a clear stream, whose bed had been deepened into a little reservoir, just opposite the house. A noble field of Indian-corn stretched away into the forest on one side, and a few half-cleared acres, with a shed or two upon them, occupied the other, giving accommodation to cows, horses, pigs, and chickens innumerable. Immediately before the house was a small potatoe garden, with a few peach and apple trees. The house was built of logs, and consisted of two rooms, besides a little shanty or lean-to, that was used as a kitchen. Both rooms were comfortably furnished with good beds, drawers, &c. The farmer’s wife, and a young woman who looked like her sister, were spinning, and three little children were playing about. The woman told me that they spun and wove all the cotton and woolen garments of the family, and knit all the stockings; her husband, though not a shoe-maker by trade, made all the shoes. She manufactured all the soap and candles they used, and prepared her sugar from the sugar-trees on their farm. All she wanted with money, she said, was to buy coffee, tea, and whiskey, and she could “get enough any day by sending a batch of butter and chicken to market.” They used no wheat, nor sold any of their corn, which, though it appeared a very large quantity, was not more than they required to make their bread and cakes of various kinds, and to feed all their live stock during the winter. She did not look in health, and said they had all had ague in “the fall;” but she seemed contented, and proud of her independence; though it was in somewhat a mournful accent that she said, “Tis strange to us to see company: I expect the sun may rise and set a hundred times before I shall see another human that does not belong to the family.”
We visited a farm that particularly intrigued us because of its remote and isolated location, and the complete reliance of the inhabitants on their own resources. It was a partial clearing in the heart of the forest. The house was built on the side of a steep hill, so high that a tall ladder was needed to enter the front door, while the back door opened against the hillside. At the base of this sudden rise flowed a clear stream, which had been deepened into a small reservoir right in front of the house. A beautiful field of corn stretched into the forest on one side, and a few partially cleared acres with a couple of sheds occupied the other side, providing shelter for numerous cows, horses, pigs, and chickens. Directly in front of the house was a small potato garden, along with a few peach and apple trees. The house was made of logs and had two rooms, plus a small shanty or lean-to used as a kitchen. Both rooms were comfortably furnished with good beds, drawers, etc. The farmer’s wife and a young woman who looked like her sister were spinning, while three little children played nearby. The woman told me that they spun and wove all the cotton and woolen clothes for the family and knitted all the stockings; her husband, even though he wasn't a shoemaker, made all the shoes. She made all the soap and candles they used and got her sugar from the sugar trees on their farm. All she needed money for, she said, was to buy coffee, tea, and whiskey, and she could “get enough any day by sending a batch of butter and chickens to market.” They didn't use any wheat or sell any of their corn, which, although it seemed like a lot, was only as much as they needed for making their bread and various cakes, as well as to feed all their livestock during the winter. She didn't seem very healthy and mentioned that they had all suffered from ague in “the fall”; however, she appeared content and proud of her independence, even if her tone had a slightly sad note when she said, “It’s strange for us to see company: I expect the sun may rise and set a hundred times before I see another human who doesn't belong to the family.”
I have been minute in the description of this forest farm, as I think it the best specimen I saw of the back-wood’s independence, of which so much is said in America. These people were indeed independent, Robinson Crusoe was hardly more so, and they eat and drink abundantly; but yet it seemed to me that there was something awful and almost unnatural in their loneliness. No village bell ever summoned them to prayer, where they might meet the friendly greeting of their fellow-men. When they die, no spot sacred by ancient reverence will receive their bones—Religion will not breathe her sweet and solemn farewell upon their grave; the husband or the father will dig the pit that is to hold them, beneath the nearest tree; he will himself deposit them within it, and the wind that whispers through the boughs will be their only requiem. But then they pay neither taxes nor tythes, are never expected to pull off a hat or to make a curtsy, and will live and die without hearing or uttering the dreadful words, “God save the king.”
I’ve been detailed in describing this forest farm because I think it’s the best example I’ve seen of the backwoods independence that gets talked about so much in America. These people were truly independent—Robinson Crusoe was hardly more so—and they eat and drink plenty; but it struck me that their loneliness was something dreadful and almost unnatural. No village bell ever calls them to prayer, where they might enjoy a friendly greeting from their neighbors. When they die, there’s no place marked by ancient respect to lay their bones—Religion won’t offer her sweet and solemn farewell at their grave; the husband or father will dig the hole beneath the nearest tree, place them inside, and the wind rustling through the branches will be their only farewell. But they don’t pay taxes or tithes, they’re never expected to take off a hat or bow, and they’ll live and die without ever hearing or saying the dreadful words, “God save the king.”
About two miles below Cincinnati, on the Kentucky side of the river, Mr. Bullock, the well known proprietor of the Egyptian Hall, has bought a large estate, with a noble house upon it. He and his amiable wife were devoting themselves to the embellishment of the house and grounds; and certainly there is more taste and art lavished on one of their beautiful saloons, than all Western America can show elsewhere. It is impossible to help feeling that Mr. Bullock is rather out of his element in this remote spot, and the gems of art he has brought with him, shew as strangely there, as would a bower of roses in Siberia, or a Cincinnati fashionable at Almack’s. The exquisite beauty of the spot, commanding one of the finest reaches of the Ohio, the extensive gardens, and the large and handsome mansion, have tempted Mr. Bullock to spend a large sum in the purchase of this place, and if any one who has passed his life in London could endure such a change, the active mind and sanguine spirit of Mr. Bullock might enable him to do it; but his frank, and truly English hospitality, and his enlightened and enquiring mind, seemed sadly wasted there. I have since heard with pleasure that Mr. Bullock has parted with this beautiful, but secluded mansion.
About two miles below Cincinnati, on the Kentucky side of the river, Mr. Bullock, the well-known owner of the Egyptian Hall, has purchased a large estate with a magnificent house. He and his lovely wife were focused on enhancing the house and grounds, and it's clear that there is more taste and artistry in one of their beautiful rooms than all of Western America can showcase elsewhere. It's hard not to feel that Mr. Bullock is somewhat out of place in this remote area, and the artworks he has brought with him appear as oddly positioned there as a bower of roses in Siberia or a fashionable Cincinnati resident at Almack’s. The stunning beauty of the location, overlooking one of the finest stretches of the Ohio River, the expansive gardens, and the large, attractive mansion have led Mr. Bullock to spend a significant amount on this property. If anyone who has lived in London could handle such a dramatic change, it might be Mr. Bullock with his active mind and optimistic spirit; however, his open and genuinely English hospitality, along with his inquisitive and enlightened nature, seem sadly wasted there. I have since happily heard that Mr. Bullock has sold this beautiful but isolated mansion.
CHAPTER VI
Servants—Society—Evening Parties
Staff—Society—Evening Events
The greatest difficulty in organising a family establishment in Ohio, is getting servants, or, as it is there called, “getting help,” for it is more than petty treason to the Republic, to call a free citizen a servant. The whole class of young women, whose bread depends upon their labour, are taught to believe that the most abject poverty is preferable to domestic service. Hundreds of half-naked girls work in the paper-mills, or in any other manufactory, for less than half the wages they would receive in service; but they think their equality is compromised by the latter, and nothing but the wish to obtain some particular article of finery will ever induce them to submit to it. A kind friend, however, exerted herself so effectually for me, that a tall stately lass soon presented herself, saying, “I be come to help you.” The intelligence was very agreeable, and I welcomed her in the most gracious manner possible, and asked what I should give her by the year.
The biggest challenge in setting up a household in Ohio is finding help, or as people there say, "getting help," since it's considered a serious offense to call a free citizen a servant. The entire group of young women who rely on their work for a living is taught to think that even the worst poverty is better than working in domestic service. Hundreds of partially clothed girls toil in paper mills or other factories for less than half the pay they would earn in service, but they believe their equality is at stake in the latter, and only a strong desire for some fashionable item will make them consider it. However, a kind friend went out of her way to assist me, and soon a tall, elegant girl showed up, saying, “I’ve come to help you.” This news was very pleasant, and I greeted her as warmly as I could and asked what I should pay her for the year.
“Oh Gimini!” exclaimed the damsel, with a loud laugh, “you be a downright Englisher, sure enough. I should like to see a young lady engage by the year in America! I hope I shall get a husband before many months, or I expect I shall be an outright old maid, for I be most seventeen already; besides, mayhap I may want to go to school. You must just give me a dollar and half a week, and mother’s slave, Phillis, must come over once a week, I expect, from t’other side the water, to help me clean.” I agreed to the bargain, of course, with all dutiful submission; and seeing she was preparing to set to work in a yellow dress parseme with red roses, I gently hinted, that I thought it was a pity to spoil so fine a gown, and that she had better change it.
“Oh Gimini!” the young woman exclaimed with a loud laugh, “you really are a true Englishman. I’d love to see a young lady get engaged by the end of the year in America! I hope I’ll find a husband in the next few months, or I’ll probably end up an old maid because I’m almost seventeen already; besides, I might want to go to school. You just need to give me a dollar and a half a week, and my mother’s helper, Phillis, will need to come over once a week from the other side of the water to help me clean.” I, of course, agreed to the deal with all due respect; and as I saw she was getting ready to work in a yellow dress adorned with red roses, I gently suggested that it would be a shame to ruin such a lovely gown and that she should probably change it.
“’Tis just my best and my worst,” she answered, “for I’ve got no other.”
“It's just my best and my worst,” she replied, “because I don't have anything else.”
And in truth I found that this young lady had left the paternal mansion with no more clothes of any kind than what she had on. I immediately gave her money to purchase what was necessary for cleanliness and decency, and set to work with my daughters to make her a gown. She grinned applause when our labour was completed, but never uttered the slightest expression of gratitude for that, or for any thing else we could do for her. She was constantly asking us to lend her different articles of dress, and when we declined it, she said, “Well, I never seed such grumpy folks as you be; there is several young ladies of my acquaintance what goes to live out now and then with the old women about the town, and they and their gurls always lends them what they asks for; I guess you Inglish thinks we should poison your things, just as bad as if we was Negurs.” And here I beg to assure the reader, that whenever I give conversations they were not made À LOISIR, but were written down immediately after they occurred, with all the verbal fidelity my memory permitted.
And honestly, I discovered that this young lady had left her family home with nothing but the clothes she was wearing. I immediately gave her money to buy what she needed for cleanliness and decency, and I got to work with my daughters to make her a dress. She smiled in approval when we finished, but never expressed any gratitude for that or for anything else we did for her. She constantly asked us to lend her various items of clothing, and when we said no, she responded, "Well, I’ve never met such grumpy people like you; there are several young ladies I know who sometimes stay with the older women around town, and they always lend them whatever they ask for. I guess you English think we’d ruin your things, just as if we were Black." And I assure the reader that whenever I recount conversations, they were not made casually but were written down right after they happened, with all the verbal accuracy my memory allowed.
This young lady left me at the end of two months, because I refused to lend her money enough to buy a silk dress to go to a ball, saying, “Then ’tis not worth my while to stay any longer.”
This young woman left me after two months because I wouldn’t lend her enough money to buy a silk dress for a ball, saying, “Then it’s not worth my time to stick around any longer.”
I cannot imagine it possible that such a state of things can be desirable, or beneficial to any of the parties concerned. I might occupy a hundred pages on the subject, and yet fail to give an adequate idea of the sore, angry, ever wakeful pride that seemed to torment these poor wretches. In many of them it was so excessive, that all feeling of displeasure, or even of ridicule, was lost in pity. One of these was a pretty girl, whose natural disposition must have been gentle and kind; but her good feelings were soured, and her gentleness turned to morbid sensitiveness, by having heard a thousand and a thousand times that she was as good as any other lady, that all men were equal, and women too, and that it was a sin and a shame for a free-born American to be treated like a servant.
I can't imagine how such a situation could be desirable or beneficial for anyone involved. I could write a hundred pages on this topic and still not capture the deep, painful pride that seemed to torment these unfortunate people. In many cases, their pride was so overwhelming that any feelings of anger or even ridicule were overshadowed by pity. One of them was a pretty girl who must have had a naturally gentle and kind nature; however, her good feelings were twisted, and her gentleness turned into excessive sensitivity because she had heard time and time again that she was just as good as any other woman, that all men were equal, and women too, and that it was a sin and a shame for a free-born American to be treated like a servant.
When she found she was to dine in the kitchen, she turned up her pretty lip, and said, “I guess that’s ’cause you don’t think I’m good enough to eat with you. You’ll find that won’t do here.” I found afterwards that she rarely ate any dinner at all, and generally passed the time in tears. I did every thing in my power to conciliate and make her happy, but I am sure she hated me. I gave her very high wages, and she staid till she had obtained several expensive articles of dress, and then, UN BEAU MATIN, she came to me full dressed, and said, “I must go.” “When shall you return, Charlotte?” “I expect you’ll see no more of me.” And so we parted. Her sister was also living with me, but her wardrobe was not yet completed, and she remained some weeks longer, till it was.
When she found out she was going to eat in the kitchen, she curled her pretty lip and said, “I guess that’s because you don’t think I’m good enough to eat with you. You’ll see that won’t work here.” I later discovered that she hardly ever ate dinner and mostly spent her time in tears. I did everything I could to make her happy, but I was sure she hated me. I paid her really well, and she stayed until she had gotten several expensive outfits, and then, ONE BEAUTIFUL MORNING, she came to me all dressed up and said, “I have to go.” “When will you be back, Charlotte?” “I don’t think you’ll see me again.” And that’s how we parted. Her sister was also living with me, but her wardrobe wasn’t complete yet, so she stayed a few more weeks until it was.
I fear it may be called bad taste to say so much concerning my domestics, but, nevertheless, the circumstances are so characteristic of America that I must recount another history relating to them. A few days after the departure of my ambitious belle, my cries for “Help” had been so effectual that another young lady presented herself, with the usual preface “I’m come to help you.” I had been cautioned never to ask for a reference for character, as it would not only rob me of that help, but entirely prevent my ever getting another; so, five minutes after she entered she was installed, bundle and all, as a member of the family. She was by no means handsome, but there was an air of simple frankness in her manner that won us all. For my own part, I thought I had got a second Jeanie Deans; for she recounted to me histories of her early youth, wherein her plain good sense and strong mind had enabled her to win her way through a host of cruel step-mothers, faithless lovers, and cheating brothers. Among other things, she told me, with the appearance of much emotion, that she had found, since she came to town, a cure for all her sorrows, “Thanks and praise for it, I have got religion!” and then she asked if I would spare her to go to Meeting every Tuesday and Thursday evening; “You shall not have to want me, Mrs. Trollope, for our minister knows that we have all our duties to perform to man, as well as to God, and he makes the Meeting late in the evening that they may not cross one another.” Who could refuse? Not I, and Nancy had leave to go to Meeting two evenings in the week, besides Sundays.
I worry it might seem in poor taste to talk so much about my helpers, but the situation is so typical of America that I have to share another story about them. A few days after my ambitious beauty left, my calls for “Help” were so effective that another young lady showed up, saying, “I’m here to help you.” I had been warned never to ask for a reference for character, as it would not only cost me that assistance but also prevent me from getting any future help; so, five minutes after she arrived, she was fully settled in, bags and all, as part of the family. She wasn’t exactly beautiful, but there was a genuine openness in her manner that won us all over. Personally, I thought I had found a second Jeanie Deans; she shared stories from her early life, where her straightforward common sense and strong will helped her navigate through a series of cruel stepmothers, unfaithful lovers, and deceitful brothers. Among other things, she told me, with a look of great emotion, that since moving to town, she had found a cure for all her troubles: “Thanks and praise for it, I have found religion!” Then she asked if she could go to Meeting every Tuesday and Thursday evening; “You won’t miss me, Mrs. Trollope, because our minister knows we have duties to perform to both man and God, and he schedules the Meeting late in the evening so they don’t overlap.” Who could say no? Not me, and Nancy was allowed to attend Meeting twice a week, in addition to Sundays.
One night, that the mosquitoes had found their way under my net, and prevented my sleeping, I heard some one enter the house very late; I got up, went to the top of the stairs, and, by the help of a bright moon, recognised Nancy’s best bonnet. I called to her: “You are very late.” said I. “what is the reason of it?” “Oh, Mrs. Trollope,” she replied, “I am late, indeed! We have this night had seventeen souls added to our flock. May they live to bless this night! But it has been a long sitting, and very warm; I’ll just take a drink of water, and get to bed; you shan’t find me later in the morning for it.” Nor did I. She was an excellent servant, and performed more than was expected from her; moreover, she always found time to read the Bible several times in the day, and I seldom saw her occupied about any thing without observing that she had placed it near her.
One night, after the mosquitoes had snuck under my net and kept me from sleeping, I heard someone come into the house really late. I got up, went to the top of the stairs, and, with the help of a bright moon, recognized Nancy’s best bonnet. I called out to her: “You’re really late,” I said. “What’s the reason for it?” “Oh, Mrs. Trollope,” she replied, “I am indeed late! We added seventeen souls to our flock tonight. May they live to bless this night! But it’s been a long evening, and very warm; I’ll just grab a drink of water and head to bed; you won’t find me late in the morning for it.” And I didn’t. She was an excellent servant and did more than what was expected of her; plus, she always made time to read the Bible several times a day, and I rarely saw her working on anything without noticing that she had it nearby.
At last she fell sick with the cholera, and her life was despaired of. I nursed her with great care, and sat up the greatest part of two nights with her. She was often delirious, and all her wandering thoughts seemed to ramble to heaven. “I have been a sinner,” she said, “but I am safe in the Lord Jesus.” When she recovered, she asked me to let her go into the country for a few days, to change the air, and begged me to lend her three dollars.
At last, she got sick with cholera, and everyone thought she might not make it. I took care of her with a lot of attention, staying up almost two whole nights beside her. She was often delusional, and all her erratic thoughts seemed to drift towards heaven. “I have been a sinner,” she said, “but I am safe in the Lord Jesus.” When she got better, she asked me if she could go to the countryside for a few days to get a change of scenery, and she begged me to lend her three dollars.
While she was absent a lady called on me, and enquired, with some agitation, if my servant, Nancy Fletcher, were at home. I replied that she was gone into the country. “Thank God,” she exclaimed, “never let her enter your doors again, she is the most abandoned woman in the town: a gentleman who knows you, has been told that she lives with you, and that she boasts of having the power of entering your house at any hour of night.” She told me many other circumstances, unnecessary to repeat, but all tending to prove that she was a very dangerous inmate.
While she was away, a woman came to see me and anxiously asked if my servant, Nancy Fletcher, was home. I told her that Nancy had gone to the country. “Thank God,” she said, “never let her come back; she’s the most reckless woman in town. A gentleman who knows you has heard that she lives with you and that she brags about being able to come to your house at any hour of the night.” She shared many other details, which I won't repeat, but all suggested that Nancy was a very dangerous person to have around.
I expected her home the next evening, and I believe I passed the interval in meditating how to get rid of her without an eclaircissement. At length she arrived, and all my study having failed to supply me with any other reason than the real one for dismissing her, I stated it at once. Not the slightest change passed over her countenance, but she looked steadily at me, and said, in a very civil tone, “I should like to know who told you.” I replied that it could be of no advantage to her to know, and that I wished her to go immediately. “I am ready to go,” she said, in the same quiet tone, “but what will you do for your three dollars?” “I must do without them, Nancy; good morning to you.” “I must just put up my things,” she said, and left the room. About half an hour afterwards, when we were all assembled at dinner, she entered with her usual civil composed air, “Well, I am come to wish you all goodbye,” and with a friendly good-humoured smile she left us.
I expected her home the next evening, and I think I spent the time figuring out how to get rid of her without any explanation. Eventually, she arrived, and since I couldn't come up with any other reason besides the real one for letting her go, I told her directly. There was no change in her expression, but she looked at me steadily and said, in a very polite tone, “I’d like to know who told you.” I replied that it wouldn’t do her any good to know, and that I wanted her to leave immediately. “I’m ready to go,” she said in the same calm tone, “but what will you do about your three dollars?” “I’ll have to manage without them, Nancy; good morning to you.” “I just need to gather my things,” she said, and left the room. About half an hour later, when we were all sitting down for dinner, she walked in with her usual polite and composed demeanor, saying, “Well, I’ve come to say goodbye to you all,” and with a friendly smile, she left us.
This adventure frightened me so heartily, that, notwithstanding I had the dread of cooking my own dinner before my eyes, I would not take any more young ladies into my family without receiving some slight sketch of their former history. At length I met with a very worthy French woman, and soon after with a tidy English girl to assist her; and I had the good fortune to keep them till a short time before my departure: so, happily, I have no more misfortunes of this nature to relate.
This adventure scared me so much that, even though I was terrified of having to cook my own dinner, I refused to take in any more young women without getting some brief background on their history. Eventually, I met a very respectable French woman, and soon after, a neat English girl to help her out; and I was fortunate enough to keep them until shortly before I left: so, thankfully, I have no more misfortunes like this to share.
Such being the difficulties respecting domestic arrangements, it is obvious, that the ladies who are brought up amongst them cannot have leisure for any great development of the mind: it is, in fact, out of the question; and, remembering this, it is more surprising that some among them should be very pleasing, than that none should be highly instructed.
Such being the difficulties with home life, it's clear that the women raised in such environments can't find time for significant intellectual growth: it's essentially impossible. Keeping this in mind, it's more surprising that some of them are quite charming than that none are exceptionally educated.
Had I passed as many evenings in company in any other town that I ever visited as I did in Cincinnati, I should have been able to give some little account of the conversations I had listened to; but, upon reading over my notes, and then taxing my memory to the utmost to supply the deficiency, I can scarcely find a trace of any thing that deserves the name. Such as I have, shall be given in their place. But, whatever may be the talents of the persons who meet together in society, the very shape, form, and arrangement of the meeting is sufficient to paralyze conversation. The women invariably herd together at one part of the room, and the men at the other; but, in justice to Cincinnati, I must acknowledge that this arrangement is by no means peculiar to that city, or to the western side of the Alleghanies. Sometimes a small attempt at music produces a partial reunion; a few of the most daring youths, animated by the consciousness of curled hair and smart waistcoats, approach the piano forte, and begin to mutter a little to the half-grown pretty things, who are comparing with one another “how many quarters’ music they have had.” Where the mansion is of sufficient dignity to have two drawing-rooms, the piano, the little ladies, and the slender gentlemen are left to themselves, and on such occasions the sound of laughter is often heard to issue from among them. But the fate of the more dignified personages, who are left in the other room, is extremely dismal. The gentlemen spit, talk of elections and the price of produce, and spit again. The ladies look at each other’s dresses till they know every pin by heart; talk of Parson Somebody’s last sermon on the day of judgment, on Dr. T’otherbody’s new pills for dyspepsia, till the “tea” is announced, when they all console themselves together for whatever they may have suffered in keeping awake, by taking more tea, coffee, hot cake and custard, hoe cake, johny cake, waffle cake, and dodger cake, pickled peaches, and preserved cucumbers, ham, turkey, hung beef, apple sauce, and pickled oysters than ever were prepared in any other country of the known world. After this massive meal is over, they return to the drawing-room, and it always appeared to me that they remained together as long as they could bear it, and then they rise EN MASSE, cloak, bonnet, shawl, and exit.
If I had spent as many evenings socializing in any other town I've visited as I did in Cincinnati, I would have been able to give some account of the conversations I overheard. However, after going through my notes and pushing my memory to the limit to fill in the gaps, I can hardly find anything worth mentioning. The bits I do have will be shared in their proper context. Regardless of the talents of the people who gather, the layout and setup of these meetings are enough to stifle conversation. The women always group together in one part of the room, while the men are off in another. But to be fair to Cincinnati, this setup isn't unique to that city or the western side of the Alleghenies. Sometimes a small attempt at music brings people closer; a few bold young men, feeling confident with their styled hair and sharp vests, approach the piano and start chatting up the girls who are comparing how many music lessons they’ve taken. In homes grand enough to have two drawing rooms, the piano, the young ladies, and the dapper gentlemen are left to their own devices, and often laughter can be heard coming from that corner. Meanwhile, the fate of the more serious folks stuck in the other room is quite dull. The men chew and talk about elections and the price of goods, then spit again. The women examine each other’s dresses until they can name every pin, discuss Parson Somebody’s latest sermon about judgment day, and Dr. T’otherbody’s new pills for digestion, until “tea” is called. At that point, they all comfort themselves for whatever they endured while trying to stay awake by indulging in more tea, coffee, hot cake and custard, hoe cake, johnny cake, waffle cake, and dodger cake, pickled peaches, preserved cucumbers, ham, turkey, cured beef, applesauce, and pickled oysters than you would find anywhere else in the world. Once that feast is finished, they return to the drawing room, and it always seemed to me that they stick around as long as they can stand it, then they rise as a group, gather their cloaks, bonnets, and shawls, and head out.
CHAPTER VII
Market—Museum—Picture Gallery—Academy of Fine Arts Drawing School—Phrenological Society—Miss Wright’s Lecture.
Market—Museum—Art Gallery—Fine Arts Academy Drawing School—Phrenology Society—Miss Wright’s Lecture.
Perhaps the most advantageous feature in Cincinnati is its market, which, for excellence, abundance, and cheapness, can hardly, I should think, be surpassed in any part of the world, if I except the luxury of fruits, which are very inferior to any I have seen in Europe. There are no butchers, fishmongers, or indeed any shops for eatables, except bakeries, as they are called, in the town; every thing must be purchased at market; and to accomplish this, the busy housewife must be stirring betimes, or, ’spite of the abundant supply, she will find her hopes of breakfast, dinner, and supper for the day defeated, the market being pretty well over by eight o’clock.
Perhaps the best feature of Cincinnati is its market, which, in terms of quality, variety, and affordability, is hard to beat anywhere in the world, except for the luxurious fruits that are much worse than any I've seen in Europe. There aren’t any butchers, fishmongers, or actually any food shops, aside from bakeries, in town; everything must be bought at the market. To do this, the busy housewife needs to be up early, or despite the plentiful supply, she will find her hopes for breakfast, lunch, and dinner for the day dashed, as the market is usually pretty much wrapped up by eight o'clock.
The beef is excellent, and the highest price when we were there, four cents (about two-pence) the pound. The mutton was inferior, and so was veal to the eye, but it ate well, though not very fat; the price was about the same. The poultry was excellent; fowls or full-sized chickens, ready for table, twelve cents, but much less if bought alive, and not quite fat; turkeys about fifty cents, and geese the same. The Ohio furnishes several sorts of fish, some of them very good, and always to be found cheap and abundant in the market. Eggs, butter, nearly all kinds of vegetables, excellent, and at moderate prices. From June till December tomatoes (the great luxury of the American table in the opinion of most Europeans) may be found in the highest perfection in the market for about sixpence the peck. They have a great variety of beans unknown in England, particularly the lima-bean, the seed of which is dressed like the French harico; it furnishes a very abundant crop, and is a most delicious vegetable: could it be naturalised with us it would be a valuable acquisition. The Windsor, or broad-bean, will not do well there; Mr. Bullock had them in his garden, where they were cultivated with much care; they grew about a foot high and blossomed, but the pod never ripened. All the fruit I saw exposed for sale in Cincinnati was most miserable. I passed two summers there, but never tasted a peach worth eating. Of apricots and nectarines I saw none; strawberries very small, raspberries much worse; gooseberries very few, and quite uneatable; currants about half the size of ours, and about double the price; grapes too sour for tarts; apples abundant, but very indifferent, none that would be thought good enough for an English table; pears, cherries, and plums most miserably bad. The flowers of these regions were at least equally inferior: whether this proceeds from want of cultivation or from peculiarity of soil I know not, but after leaving Cincinnati, I was told by a gentleman who appeared to understand the subject, that the state of Ohio had no indigenous flowers or fruits. The water-melons, which in that warm climate furnish a delightful refreshment, were abundant and cheap; but all other melons very inferior to those of France, or even of England, when ripened in a common hot-bed.
The beef is excellent, and the highest price when we were there was four cents (about two pence) per pound. The mutton was not very good, and the veal looked unappealing, but it tasted fine, though it wasn't very fatty; the price was about the same. The poultry was excellent; full-sized chickens ready for cooking were twelve cents, but much cheaper if bought alive and not quite fat; turkeys were around fifty cents, and so were geese. Ohio offers several kinds of fish, some of which are really good, and they’re always cheap and plentiful in the market. Eggs, butter, and nearly all kinds of vegetables are excellent and reasonably priced. From June to December, tomatoes—the luxury of the American table in the eyes of many Europeans—can be found in great condition in the market for about six pence per peck. They have a wide variety of beans that are unknown in England, especially the lima bean, which is cooked like French haricot; it yields an abundant crop and is a delicious vegetable: if it could be cultivated here, it would be a great asset. The Windsor or broad bean doesn’t grow well there; Mr. Bullock had some in his garden, where they were carefully tended; they grew about a foot tall and bloomed, but the pods never ripened. All the fruit I saw for sale in Cincinnati was pretty disappointing. I spent two summers there but never had a peach worth eating. I didn’t see any apricots or nectarines; strawberries were very small, raspberries were even worse; there were very few gooseberries, and they were inedible; currants were about half the size of ours and about twice the price; grapes were too sour for pies; apples were plentiful but very mediocre, none that would be considered good enough for an English table; pears, cherries, and plums were terribly bad. The flowers in this region were also quite inferior: whether this is due to lack of cultivation or the type of soil, I’m not sure, but after leaving Cincinnati, a gentleman who seemed knowledgeable told me that the state of Ohio has no native flowers or fruits. Watermelons, which provide a refreshing treat in that warm climate, were abundant and cheap; however, all other melons were very inferior to those from France or even England when grown in a typical hotbed.
From the almost total want of pasturage near the city, it is difficult for a stranger to divine how milk is furnished for its supply, but we soon learnt that there are more ways than one of keeping a cow. A large proportion of the families in the town, particularly of the poorer class, have one, though apparently without any accommodation whatever for it. These animals are fed morning and evening at the door of the house, with a good mess of Indian corn, boiled with water; while they eat, they are milked, and when the operation is completed the milk-pail and the meal-tub retreat into the dwelling, leaving the republican cow to walk away, to take her pleasure on the hills, or in the gutters, as may suit her fancy best. They generally return very regularly to give and take the morning and evening meal; though it more than once happened to us, before we were supplied by a regular milk cart, to have our jug sent home empty, with the sad news that “the cow was not come home, and it was too late to look for her to breakfast now.” Once, I remember, the good woman told us that she had overslept herself, and that the cow had come and gone again, “not liking, I expect, to hanker about by herself for nothing, poor thing.”
From the lack of pasture near the city, it’s hard for someone new to understand how milk is sourced, but we quickly discovered there are several ways to keep a cow. Many families in the town, especially those who are poorer, own one, even though there seems to be no proper space for it. These cows are fed morning and evening right at the front door with a hearty mix of corn boiled in water; while they eat, they are milked, and once that’s done, the milk pail and food bucket go back inside, leaving the free-range cow to wander off, enjoying herself on the hills or in the streets, whichever she prefers. They usually come back regularly for their meals, but more than once, before we started getting our milk delivered by a regular cart, we received our jug back empty, along with the disappointing news that “the cow hasn’t come home, and it’s too late to look for her for breakfast now.” I remember one time, the kind woman mentioned she had overslept and that the cow had come and gone again, “probably not wanting to hang around for nothing, poor thing.”
Cincinnati has not many lions to boast, but among them are two museums of natural history; both of these contain many respectable specimens, particularly that of Mr. Dorfeuille, who has moreover, some highly interesting Indian antiquities. He is a man of taste and science, but a collection formed strictly according to their dictates, would by no means satisfy the western metropolis. The people have a most extravagant passion for wax figures, and the two museums vie with each other in displaying specimens of this barbarous branch of art. As Mr. Dorfeuille cannot trust to his science for attracting the citizens, he has put his ingenuity into requisition, and this has proved to him the surer aid of the two. He has constructed a pandaemonium in an upper story of his museum, in which he has congregated all the images of horror that his fertile fancy could devise; dwarfs that by machinery grow into giants before the eyes of the spectator; imps of ebony with eyes of flame; monstrous reptiles devouring youth and beauty; lakes of fire, and mountains of ice; in short, wax, paint and springs have done wonders. “To give the scheme some more effect,” he makes it visible only through a grate of massive iron bars, among which are arranged wires connected with an electrical machine in a neighbouring chamber; should any daring hand or foot obtrude itself with the bars, it receives a smart shock, that often passes through many of the crowd, and the cause being unknown, the effect is exceedingly comic; terror, astonishment, curiosity, are all set in action, and all contribute to make “Dorfeuille’s Hell” one of the most amusing exhibitions imaginable.
Cincinnati doesn’t have many lions to brag about, but it does have two natural history museums. Both of these have some impressive specimens, especially those collected by Mr. Dorfeuille, who also has some fascinating Indian artifacts. He’s a man of taste and knowledge, but a collection strictly adhering to scientific principles wouldn’t satisfy the western city. The locals have an outrageous love for wax figures, and the two museums compete to showcase examples of this unusual art form. Since Mr. Dorfeuille can’t rely solely on his expertise to draw in the crowds, he’s used his creativity, which has proven to be the more effective approach. He’s created a chaotic scene on an upper floor of his museum, gathering all the terrifying figures that his imaginative mind could come up with: dwarfs that magically grow into giants before the viewers’ eyes; black imps with fiery eyes; monstrous reptiles devouring youth and beauty; lakes of fire and mountains of ice; in short, wax, paint, and mechanisms have accomplished amazing feats. “To add to the drama,” he makes it visible only through a heavy iron grate, with wires connected to an electrical machine in a nearby room; if anyone daringly tries to reach through the bars, they get a jolt that often shocks many in the crowd, and since the cause is unknown, it becomes hilariously funny; fear, surprise, and curiosity are all sparked, making “Dorfeuille’s Hell” one of the most entertaining exhibitions you can imagine.
There is also a picture gallery at Cincinnati, and this was a circumstance of much interest to us, as our friend Mr. H., who had accompanied Miss Wright to America, in the expectation of finding a good opening in the line of historical painting, intended commencing his experiment at Cincinnati. It would be invidious to describe the picture gallery; I have no doubt, that some years hence it will present a very different appearance. Mr. H. was very kindly received by many of the gentlemen of the city, and though the state of the fine arts there gave him but little hope that he should meet with much success, he immediately occupied himself in painting a noble historical picture of the landing of General Lafayette at Cincinnati.
There’s also an art gallery in Cincinnati, which was something we found really interesting because our friend Mr. H., who came with Miss Wright to America hoping to find a good opportunity in historical painting, planned to start his project there. It wouldn’t be fair to describe the art gallery too much; I’m sure that in a few years it will look very different. Mr. H. was warmly welcomed by many gentlemen in the city, and even though the local art scene didn’t give him much hope for success, he immediately got to work on a grand historical painting of General Lafayette’s arrival in Cincinnati.
Perhaps the clearest proof of the little feeling for art that existed at that time in Cincinnati, may be drawn from the result of an experiment originated by a German, who taught drawing there. He conceived the project of forming a chartered academy of fine arts; and he succeeded in the beginning to his utmost wish, or rather, “they fooled him to the top of his bent.” Three thousand dollars were subscribed, that is to say, names were written against different sums to that amount, a house was chosen, and finally, application was made to the government, and the charter obtained, rehearsing formally the names of the subscribing members, the professors, and the officers. So far did the steam of their zeal impel them, but at this point it was let off; the affair stood still, and I never heard the academy of fine arts mentioned afterwards.
Perhaps the clearest proof of the lack of appreciation for art at that time in Cincinnati can be drawn from the outcome of an experiment started by a German art instructor. He came up with the idea of creating a chartered academy of fine arts; and at first, he achieved his goal, or rather, “they led him on.” Three thousand dollars were pledged, meaning names were registered next to various amounts totaling that sum, a location was selected, and ultimately, an application was submitted to the government, leading to the acquisition of the charter, which formally listed the names of the members, professors, and officers. Their enthusiasm carried them this far, but at that point, it fizzled out; the project stalled, and I never heard the academy of fine arts mentioned again.
This same German gentleman, on seeing Mr. H.’s sketches, was so well pleased with them, that he immediately proposed his joining him in his drawing school, with an agreement, I believe that his payment from it should be five hundred dollars a year. Mr. H. accepted the proposal, but the union did not last long, and the cause of its dissolution was too American to be omitted. Mr. H. prepared his models, and attended the class, which was numerous, consisting both of boys and girls. He soon found that the “sage called Decipline” was not one of the assistants, and he remonstrated against the constant talking, and running from one part of the room to another, but in vain; finding, however, that he could do nothing till this was discontinued, he wrote some rules, enforcing order, for the purpose of placing them at the door of the academy. When he shewed them to his colleague, he shook his head, and said, “Very goot, very goot in Europe, but America boys and gals vill not bear it, dey will do just vat dey please; Suur, dey vould all go avay next day.” “And you will not enforce these regulations si necessaires, Monsieur?” “Olar! not for de vorld.” “Eh bien, Monsieur, I must leave the young republicans to your management.”
This same German gentleman, upon seeing Mr. H.’s sketches, was so impressed that he immediately invited him to join his drawing school, agreeing, I believe, that he would be paid five hundred dollars a year. Mr. H. accepted the offer, but the partnership didn’t last long, and the reason for its end was too typically American to overlook. Mr. H. prepared his models and attended the class, which had many students, both boys and girls. He quickly realized that the "sage called Discipline" was not one of the assistants, and he complained about the constant talking and running around the room, but it was useless; however, finding that he couldn’t do anything until this stopped, he wrote some rules to enforce order, intending to post them at the academy’s entrance. When he showed them to his colleague, he shook his head and said, “Very good, very good in Europe, but American boys and girls will not tolerate it; they will do just what they please; surely, they would all leave the next day.” “And you won’t enforce these regulations si nécessaires, Monsieur?” “Oh no! Not for the world.” “Eh bien, Monsieur, I must leave the young republicans in your hands.”
I heard another anecdote that will help to show the state of art at this time in the west. Mr. Bullock was shewing to some gentlemen of the first standing, the very elite of Cincinnati, his beautiful collection of engravings, when one among them exclaimed, “Have you really done all these since you came here? How hard you must have worked!”
I heard another story that illustrates the state of art at this time in the west. Mr. Bullock was showing some prominent gentlemen, the very elite of Cincinnati, his beautiful collection of engravings, when one of them exclaimed, “Did you really create all these since you got here? You must have worked really hard!”
I was also told of a gentleman of High Cincinnati, TON and critical of his taste for the fine arts, who, having a drawing put into his hands, representing Hebe and the bird, umquhile sacred to Jupiter, demanded in a satirical tone, “What is this?” “Hebe,” replied the alarmed collector. “Hebe,” sneered the man of taste, “What the devil has Hebe to do with the American eagle?”
I was also told about a guy from High Cincinnati, who was picky about his taste in fine arts. When he was shown a drawing of Hebe and the bird once sacred to Jupiter, he asked sarcastically, “What is this?” “Hebe,” replied the startled collector. “Hebe,” scoffed the art critic, “What does Hebe have to do with the American eagle?”
We had not been long at Cincinnati when Dr. Caldwell, the Spurzheim of America, arrived there for the purpose of delivering lectures on phrenology. I attended his lectures, and was introduced to him. He has studied Spurzheim and Combe diligently, and seems to understand the science to which he has devoted himself; but neither his lectures nor his conversation had that delightful truth of genuine enthusiasm, which makes listening to Dr. Spurzheim so great a treat. His lectures, however, produced considerable effect. Between twenty and thirty of the most erudite citizens decided upon forming a phrenological society. A meeting was called, and fully attended; a respectable number of subscribers’ names was registered, the payment of subscriptions being arranged for a future day. President, vice- president, treasurer, and secretary, were chosen; and the first meeting dissolved with every appearance of energetic perseverance in scientific research.
We hadn’t been in Cincinnati for long when Dr. Caldwell, America’s version of Spurzheim, arrived to give lectures on phrenology. I went to his lectures and got introduced to him. He has studied Spurzheim and Combe thoroughly and seems to really understand the field he’s dedicated himself to; however, neither his lectures nor his conversations had the captivating authenticity of true enthusiasm that makes listening to Dr. Spurzheim such a joy. Nonetheless, his lectures had a significant impact. Between twenty and thirty of the most educated citizens decided to form a phrenological society. A meeting was organized and well attended; a respectable number of subscribers signed up, with payment arrangements set for a later date. They elected a president, vice president, treasurer, and secretary, and the first meeting ended with all the signs of committed determination to pursue scientific research.
The second meeting brought together one-half of this learned body, and they enacted rules and laws, and passed resolutions, sufficient, it was said, to have filled three folios.
The second meeting brought together half of this group of knowledgeable individuals, and they established rules and laws, and passed resolutions that were said to be enough to fill three volumes.
A third day of meeting arrived, which was an important one, as on this occasion the subscriptions were to be paid. The treasurer came punctually, but found himself alone. With patient hope, he waited two hours for the wise men of the west, but he waited in vain: and so expired the Phrenological Society of Cincinnati.
A third day of the meeting arrived, which was significant, as this was the day the subscriptions were due. The treasurer showed up on time but found himself alone. With hopeful patience, he waited two hours for the learned men from the west, but his wait was in vain: and so ended the Phrenological Society of Cincinnati.
I had often occasion to remark that the spirit of enterprise or improvement seldom glowed with sufficient ardour to resist the smothering effect of a demand for dollars. The Americans love talking. All great works, however, that promise a profitable result, are sure to meet support from men who have enterprise and capital sufficient to await the return; but where there is nothing but glory, or the gratification of taste to be expected, it is, I believe, very rarely that they give any thing beyond “their most sweet voices.”
I often noticed that the drive for innovation or progress rarely burned brightly enough to overcome the overwhelming demand for money. Americans love to talk. However, all significant projects that promise a profitable outcome are sure to attract support from people who have the ambition and resources to wait for returns; but when the only rewards are glory or personal satisfaction, I believe it’s quite rare for them to contribute anything beyond “their most sweet voices.”
Perhaps they are right. In Europe we see fortunes crippled by a passion for statues, or for pictures, or for books, or for gems; for all and every of the artificial wants that give grace to life, and tend to make man forget that he is a thing of clay. They are wiser in their generation on the other side the Atlantic; I rarely saw any thing that led to such oblivion there.
Perhaps they are right. In Europe, we see fortunes damaged by a love for statues, paintings, books, or gems; for all the artificial desires that add elegance to life and make people forget that they are just made of flesh and bone. They are smarter in their generation on the other side of the Atlantic; I hardly saw anything that caused such forgetfulness there.
Soon after Dr. Caldwell’s departure, another lecturer appeared upon the scene, whose purpose of publicly addressing the people was no sooner made known, than the most violent sensation was excited.
Soon after Dr. Caldwell left, another speaker came onto the scene, and as soon as it became clear that he would be addressing the public, it sparked an intense reaction.
That a lady of fortune, family, and education, whose youth had been passed in the most refined circles of private life, should present herself to the people as a public lecturer, would naturally excite surprise any where, and the nil admirari of the old world itself, would hardly be sustained before such a spectacle; but in America, where women are guarded by a seven- fold shield of habitual insignificance, it caused an effect that can hardly be described. “Miss Wright, of Nashoba, is going to lecture at the court-house,” sounded from street to street, and from house to house. I shared the surprise, but not the wonder; I knew her extraordinary gift of eloquence, her almost unequalled command of words, and the wonderful power of her rich and thrilling voice; and I doubted not that if it was her will to do it, she had the power of commanding the attention, and enchanting the ear of any audience before whom it was her pleasure to appear. I was most anxious to hear her, but was almost deterred from attempting it, by the reports that reached me of the immense crowd that was expected. After many consultations, and hearing that many other ladies intended going, my friend Mrs. P—, and myself, decided upon making the attempt, accompanied by a party of gentlemen, and found the difficulty less than we anticipated, though the building was crowded in every part. We congratulated ourselves that we had had the courage to be among the number, for all my expectations fell far short of the splendour, the brilliance, the overwhelming eloquence of this extraordinary orator.
That a wealthy, educated woman, who had spent her youth in the most refined social circles, would present herself as a public lecturer would naturally surprise anyone, and even the old world's indifference would hardly hold up against such a sight; but in America, where women are often overlooked, it created an effect that’s hard to describe. “Miss Wright, of Nashoba, is going to lecture at the courthouse,” spread from street to street and house to house. I shared the surprise but not the amazement; I knew her extraordinary gift for public speaking, her remarkable command of language, and the captivating power of her rich, powerful voice; I had no doubt that if she chose to do so, she could command attention and captivate any audience she wished. I was eager to hear her, but I was almost put off by the reports of the massive crowd expected. After many discussions, and hearing that several other ladies planned to attend, my friend Mrs. P— and I decided to go, accompanied by a group of gentlemen, and found it less challenging than we anticipated, even though the venue was packed. We congratulated ourselves for having the courage to be part of it, for all my expectations paled in comparison to the brilliance, the allure, and the overwhelming eloquence of this extraordinary speaker.
Her lecture was upon the nature of true knowledge, and it contained little that could be objected to, by any sect or party; it was intended as an introduction to the strange and startling theories contained in her subsequent lectures, and could alarm only by the hints it contained that the fabric of human wisdom could rest securely on no other base than that of human knowledge.
Her lecture was about the nature of true knowledge, and it had little that anyone from any group or party could disagree with; it was meant as an introduction to the strange and surprising theories presented in her later lectures. The only thing that might be alarming were the hints that the foundation of human wisdom could only be securely built on the base of human knowledge.
There was, however, one passage from which common-sense revolted; it was one wherein she quoted that phrase of mischievous sophistry, “all men are born free and equal.” This false and futile axiom, which has done, is doing, and will do so much harm to this fine country, came from Jefferson; and truly his life was a glorious commentary upon it. I pretend not to criticise his written works, but commonsense enables me to pronounce this, his favourite maxim, false.
There was, however, one section that just didn’t sit right; it was where she quoted that clever but misguided saying, “all men are born free and equal.” This misleading and useless claim, which has caused, is causing, and will continue to cause so much damage to this great country, came from Jefferson; and really, his life was a striking example of the opposite. I don’t mean to criticize his writings, but common sense allows me to say this, his favorite saying, is false.
Few names are held in higher estimation in America, than that of Jefferson; it is the touchstone of the democratic party, and all seem to agree that he was one of the greatest of men; yet I have heard his name coupled with deeds which would make the sons of Europe shudder. The facts I allude to are spoken openly by all, not whispered privately by a few; and in a country where religion is the tea-table talk, and its strict observance a fashionable distinction, these facts are recorded, and listened to, without horror, nay, without emotion.
Few names are held in higher regard in America than Jefferson's; he is the benchmark for the Democratic Party, and everyone seems to agree that he was one of the greatest individuals. Yet, I've heard his name associated with actions that would make the people of Europe shudder. The facts I’m referring to are openly discussed by many, not just whispered among a few; and in a country where religion is common conversation and strict observance is seen as a mark of distinction, these facts are noted and shared without horror, indeed, without any emotion.
Mr. Jefferson is said to have been the father of children by almost all his numerous gang of female slaves. These wretched offspring were also the lawful slaves of their father, and worked in his house and plantations as such; in particular, it is recorded that it was his especial pleasure to be waited upon by them at table, and the hospitable orgies for which his Montecielo was so celebrated, were incomplete, unless the goblet he quaffed were tendered by the trembling hand of his own slavish offspring.
Mr. Jefferson is said to have fathered children with nearly all of his many female slaves. These unfortunate children were also the legal slaves of their father and worked in his home and on his plantations as such. It's especially noted that he took particular pleasure in being served by them at the table, and the lavish parties for which his Montecielo was so famous were not complete unless the cup he drank from was offered by the shaking hand of his own enslaved children.
I once heard it stated by a democratical adorer of this great man, that when, as it sometimes happened, his children by Quadroon slaves were white enough to escape suspicion of their origin, he did not pursue them if they attempted to escape, saying laughingly, “Let the rogues get off, if they can; I will not hinder them.” This was stated in a large party, as a proof of his kind and noble nature, and was received by all with approving smiles.
I once heard a fan of this great man say that when, occasionally, his children with Quadroon slaves were white enough to avoid being suspected of their background, he didn’t go after them if they tried to run away. He joked, “Let the sneaky ones get away if they can; I won’t stop them.” This was shared at a big gathering as evidence of his kind and noble character, and everyone received it with approving smiles.
If I know anything of right or wrong, if virtue and vice be indeed something more than words, then was this great American an unprincipled tyrant, and most heartless libertine.
If I know anything about right or wrong, if good and evil are really more than just words, then this great American was an unprincipled tyrant and a truly heartless libertine.
But to return to Miss Wright,—it is impossible to imaging any thing more striking than her appearance. Her tall and majestic figure, the deep and almost solemn expression of her eyes, the simple contour of her finely formed head, unadorned excepting by its own natural ringlets; her garment of plain white muslin, which hung around her in folds that recalled the drapery of a Grecian statue, all contributed to produce an effect, unlike anything I had ever seen before, or ever expect to see again.
But to go back to Miss Wright—it's hard to imagine anything more striking than her appearance. Her tall and majestic figure, the deep and almost serious expression in her eyes, the simple shape of her beautifully shaped head, untouched except for its natural curls; her garment of plain white muslin, which draped around her in folds that reminded me of a Grecian statue, all created an impact like nothing I had ever seen before or ever expect to see again.
CHAPTER VIII
Absence of public and private Amusement—Churches and Chapels—Influence of the Clergy—A Revival
Absence of public and private entertainment—Churches and chapels—Influence of the clergy—A revival
I never saw any people who appeared to live so much without amusement as the Cincinnatians. Billiards are forbidden by law, so are cards. To sell a pack of cards in Ohio subjects the seller to a penalty of fifty dollars. They have no public balls, excepting, I think, six, during the Christmas holidays. They have no concerts. They have no dinner parties.
I never saw any people who seemed to live without fun as much as the Cincinnatians. Billiards are illegal, and so are cards. Selling a pack of cards in Ohio can get the seller fined fifty dollars. They don’t have public dances, except for, I think, six during the Christmas holidays. They don’t have concerts. They don’t have dinner parties.
They have a theatre, which is, in fact, the only public amusement of this triste little town; but they seem to care little about it, and either from economy or distaste, it is very poorly attended. Ladies are rarely seen there, and by far the larger proportion of females deem it an offence against religion to witness the representation of a play. It is in the churches and chapels of the town that the ladies are to be seen in full costume; and I am tempted to believe that a stranger from the continent of Europe would be inclined, on first reconnoitering the city, to suppose that the places of worship were the theatres and cafes of the place. No evening in the week but brings throngs of the young and beautiful to the chapels and meeting- houses, all dressed with care, and sometimes with great pretension; it is there that all display is made, and all fashionable distinction sought. The proportion of gentlemen attending these evening meetings is very small, but often, as might be expected, a sprinkling of smart young clerks make this sedulous display of ribbons and ringlets intelligible and natural. Were it not for the churches, indeed, I think there might be a general bonfire of best bonnets, for I never could discover any other use for them.
They have a theater, which is actually the only public entertainment in this sad little town; but it seems like they don't care much about it, and either out of saving money or dislike, it gets very few visitors. Ladies are hardly ever seen there, and most women consider it disrespectful to their religion to watch a play. The churches and chapels in town are where the ladies show up in their finest outfits; I can't help but think that a newcomer from Europe might mistake these places of worship for the city’s theaters and cafes. Every weeknight, crowds of young and beautiful people flock to the chapels and meeting houses, all dressed up and sometimes quite fancily; that’s where everyone shows off and seeks fashionable distinction. The number of gentlemen at these evening events is really low, but as you’d expect, a few stylish young clerks make this show of ribbons and curls seem understandable and normal. If it weren't for the churches, I honestly think there could be a huge bonfire of fancy hats, because I’ve never figured out any other reason for them.
The ladies are too actively employed in the interior of their houses to permit much parading in full dress for morning visits. There are no public gardens or lounging shops of fashionable resort, and were it not for public worship, and private tea- drinkings, all the ladies in Cincinnati would be in danger of becoming perfect recluses.
The women are too busy managing their homes to spend much time parading in fancy outfits for morning visits. There aren’t any public gardens or trendy shops to hang out at, and if it weren’t for religious services and private tea gatherings, all the women in Cincinnati would risk becoming complete hermits.
The influence which the ministers of all the innumerable religious sects throughout America, have on the females of their respective congregations, approaches very nearly to what we read of in Spain, or in other strictly Roman Catholic countries. There are many causes for this peculiar influence. Where equality of rank is affectedly acknowledged by the rich, and clamourously claimed by the poor, distinction and preeminence are allowed to the clergy only. This gives them high importance in the eyes of the ladies. I think, also, that it is from the clergy only that the women of America receive that sort of attention which is so dearly valued by every female heart throughout the world. With the priests of America, the women hold that degree of influential importance which, in the countries of Europe, is allowed them throughout all orders and ranks of society, except, perhaps, the very lowest; and in return for this they seem to give their hearts and souls into their keeping. I never saw, or read, of any country where religion had so strong a hold upon the women, or a slighter hold upon the men.
The influence that the ministers of all the countless religious sects across America have on the women in their congregations is very similar to what we read about in Spain or other strictly Roman Catholic countries. There are many reasons for this unique influence. When the wealthy acknowledge equality of rank in a superficial way, and the poor demand it loudly, the clergy are the only ones given distinction and prominence. This gives them significant importance in the eyes of the women. I believe that it is only from the clergy that American women receive the kind of attention that every woman everywhere values deeply. With American priests, women hold a level of influential importance that, in European countries, is granted to them across all social classes, except maybe the very lowest; in return, they seem to give their hearts and souls into their hands. I have never seen or read about any country where religion was so deeply ingrained in women or so loosely held by men.
I mean not to assert that I met with no men of sincerely religious feelings, or with no women of no religious feeling at all; but I feel perfectly secure of being correct as to the great majority in the statement I have made.
I don't mean to say that I haven't encountered men with genuinely religious feelings, or women without any religious feelings at all; but I'm quite confident I'm right about the vast majority in the statement I've made.
We had not been many months in Cincinnati when our curiosity was excited by hearing the “revival” talked of by every one we met throughout the town. “The revival will be very full”—“We shall be constantly engaged during the revival”—were the phrases we constantly heard repeated, and for a long time, without in the least comprehending what was meant; but at length I learnt that the un-national church of America required to be roused, at regular intervals, to greater energy and exertion. At these seasons the most enthusiastic of the clergy travel the country, and enter the cities and towns by scores, or by hundreds, as the accommodation of the place may admit, and for a week or fortnight, or, if the population be large, for a month; they preach and pray all day, and often for a considerable portion of the night, in the various churches and chapels of the place. This is called a Revival.
We hadn’t been in Cincinnati for long when we started hearing everyone talk about the “revival.” People would say things like, “The revival will be really packed” or “We’ll be busy throughout the revival.” We kept hearing these phrases, but it took us a while to understand what they meant. Eventually, I learned that the non-denominational church in America needed to be energized at regular intervals. During these times, the most passionate clergy travel around the country, flooding cities and towns by the dozens or even hundreds, depending on the local facilities. For a week, two weeks, or even a month if the population is big, they preach and pray all day and often well into the night in various churches and chapels. This is called a Revival.
I took considerable pains to obtain information on this subject; but in detailing what I learnt I fear that it is probable I shall be accused of exaggeration; all I can do is cautiously to avoid deserving it. The subject is highly interesting, and it would be a fault of no trifling nature to treat it with levity.
I put a lot of effort into gathering information on this topic; however, as I share what I learned, I'm worried I might be seen as exaggerating. All I can do is be careful not to earn that accusation. The topic is really fascinating, and it would be a serious mistake to approach it lightly.
These itinerant clergymen are of all persuasions, I believe, except the Episcopalian, Catholic, Unitarian, and Quaker. I heard of Presbyterians of all varieties; of Baptists of I know not how many divisions; and of Methodists of more denominations than I can remember; whose innumerable shades of varying belief, it would require much time to explain, and more to comprehend. They enter all the cities, towns, and villages of the Union, in succession; I could not learn with sufficient certainty to repeat, what the interval generally is between their visits. These itinerants are, for the most part, lodged in the houses of their respective followers, and every evening that is not spent in the churches and meeting-houses, is devoted to what would be called parties by others, but which they designate as prayer meetings. Here they eat, drink, pray, sing, hear confessions, and make converts. To these meetings I never got invited, and therefore I have nothing but hearsay evidence to offer, but my information comes from an eye-witness, and one on whom I believe I may depend. If one half of what I heard may be believed, these social prayer meetings are by no means the most curious, or the least important part of the business.
These traveling clergymen belong to all sorts of denominations, I think, except for Episcopalian, Catholic, Unitarian, and Quaker. I've heard about Presbyterians of every kind; Baptists with countless sects; and Methodists with more branches than I can count, whose endless variations in belief would take a lot of time to explain and even more to understand. They go to all the cities, towns, and villages in the country, one after the other; I couldn’t find out exactly how long it usually is between their visits. These itinerants mostly stay in the homes of their followers, and every evening that isn’t spent in churches or meeting houses is dedicated to what others might call social gatherings, but which they refer to as prayer meetings. Here they eat, drink, pray, sing, hear confessions, and try to convert people. I was never invited to these meetings, so I can only offer hearsay, but my information comes from a reliable eyewitness. If even half of what I heard is true, these social prayer meetings are certainly among the most interesting and significant parts of their work.
It is impossible not to smile at the close resemblance to be traced between the feelings of a first-rate Presbyterian or Methodist lady, fortunate enough to have secured a favourite Itinerant for her meeting, and those of a first-rate London Blue, equally blest in the presence of a fashionable poet. There is a strong family likeness among us all the world over.
It’s hard not to smile at the strong similarities between the feelings of a top-notch Presbyterian or Methodist woman, lucky enough to have a favorite traveling preacher at her meeting, and those of a top London socialite, equally blessed to have a trendy poet around. There’s a clear resemblance among all of us, no matter where we are in the world.
The best rooms, the best dresses, the choicest refreshments solemnize the meeting. While the party is assembling, the load-star of the hour is occupied in whispering conversations with the guests as they arrive. They are called brothers and sisters, and the greetings are very affectionate. When the room is full, the company, of whom a vast majority are always women, are invited, intreated, and coaxed to confess before their brothers and sisters, all their thoughts, faults, and follies.
The best rooms, the best outfits, and the finest refreshments make the gathering special. While everyone is arriving, the person of the hour is busy sharing quiet conversations with the guests. They refer to each other as brothers and sisters, and the greetings are very warm. When the room is full, the gathering, which is mostly women, is invited, urged, and encouraged to share their thoughts, mistakes, and silly moments with their brothers and sisters.
These confessions are strange scenes; the more they confess, the more invariably are they encouraged and caressed. When this is over, they all kneel, and the Itinerant prays extempore. They then eat and drink; and then they sing hymns, pray, exhort, sing, and pray again, till the excitement reaches a very high pitch indeed. These scenes are going on at some house or other every evening during the revival, nay, at many at the same time, for the churches and meeting-houses cannot give occupation to half the Itinerants, though they are all open throughout the day, and till a late hour in the night, and the officiating ministers succeed each other in the occupation of them.
These confessions are pretty unusual; the more they reveal, the more they’re encouraged and supported. When it’s all done, they all kneel, and the itinerant prays spontaneously. After that, they eat and drink; then they sing hymns, pray, encourage one another, sing, and pray again, until the excitement really builds up. These events are happening at various houses every evening during the revival, and often at multiple places at the same time, because the churches and meeting houses can’t accommodate half the itinerants, even though they’re open all day and late into the night, with different ministers taking turns leading.
It was at the principal of the Presbyterian churches that I was twice witness to scenes that made me shudder; in describing one, I describe both and every one; the same thing is constantly repeated.
It was at the head of the Presbyterian churches that I witnessed scenes that made me shudder on two occasions; by describing one, I describe both and all of them; the same thing keeps happening over and over.
It was in the middle of summer, but the service we were recommended to attend did not begin till it was dark. The church was well lighted, and crowded almost to suffocation. On entering, we found three priests standing side by side, in a sort of tribune, placed where the altar usually is, handsomely fitted up with crimson curtains, and elevated about as high as our pulpits. We took our places in a pew close to the rail which surrounded it.
It was the middle of summer, but the service we were told to attend didn't start until it was dark. The church was well-lit and crowded almost to the point of suffocation. Upon entering, we saw three priests standing side by side in a kind of platform where the altar usually is, nicely decorated with crimson curtains, and elevated about as high as our pulpits. We took our seats in a pew close to the rail that surrounded it.
The priest who stood in the middle was praying; the prayer was extravagantly vehement, and offensively familiar in expression; when this ended, a hymn was sung, and then another priest took the centre place, and preached. The sermon had considerable eloquence, but of a frightful kind. The preacher described, with ghastly minuteness, the last feeble fainting moments of human life, and then the gradual progress of decay after death, which he followed through every process up to the last loathsome stage of decomposition. Suddenly changing his tone, which had been that of sober accurate description, into the shrill voice of horror, he bent forward his head, as if to gaze on some object beneath the pulpit. And as Rebecca made known to Ivanhoe what she saw through the window, so the preacher made known to us what he saw in the pit that seemed to open before him. The device was certainly a happy one for giving effect to his description of hell. No image that fire, flame, brimestone, molten lead, or red-hot pincers could supply; with flesh, nerves, and sinews quivering under them, was omitted. The perspiration ran in streams from the face of the preacher; his eyes rolled, his lips were covered with foam, and every feature had the deep expression of horror it would have borne, had he, in truth, been gazing at the scene he described. The acting was excellent. At length he gave a languishing look to his supporters on each side, as if to express his feeble state, and then sat down, and wiped the drops of agony from his brow.
The priest in the middle was praying; the prayer was intensely passionate and overly familiar in tone. Once this ended, a hymn was sung, and another priest stepped into the spotlight to preach. The sermon was quite eloquent, but in a frightening way. The preacher described, in disturbing detail, the last weak moments of life and then the slow process of decay after death, detailing every step up to the final grotesque stage of decomposition. Suddenly shifting from a calm, precise description to a shrill, horrifying voice, he leaned forward as if to look at something beneath the pulpit. Just as Rebecca told Ivanhoe what she saw through the window, the preacher revealed what he saw in the pit that seemed to open before him. This tactic certainly made his description of hell more effective. He included every horrific image you could imagine: fire, flames, brimstone, molten lead, and red-hot pincers, with flesh, nerves, and tendons quivering beneath them. Sweat poured down the preacher's face; his eyes rolled, his lips foamed, and every feature expressed the deep horror he would have shown if he had truly been witnessing the scene he described. The performance was exceptional. Finally, he gave a weary glance to the people beside him, as if to show his exhaustion, then sat down and wiped the beads of sweat from his brow.
The other two priests arose, and began to sing a hymn. It was some seconds before the congregation could join as usual; every upturned face looked pale and horror struck. When the singing ended, another took the centre place, and began in a sort of coaxing affectionate tone, to ask the congregation if what their dear brother had spoken had reached their hearts? Whether they would avoid the hell he had made them see? “Come, then!” he continued, stretching out his arms towards them, “come to us, and tell us so, and we will make you see Jesus, the dear gentle Jesus, who shall save you from it. But you must come to him! You must not be ashamed to come to him! This night you shall tell him that you are not ashamed of him; we will make way for you; we will clear the bench for anxious sinners to sit upon. Come, then! come to the anxious bench, and we will shew you Jesus! Come! Come! Come!” Again a hymn was sung, and while it continued, one of the three was employed in clearing one or two long benches that went across the rail, sending the people back to the lower part of the church. The singing ceased, and again the people were invited, and exhorted not to be ashamed of Jesus, but to put themselves upon “the anxious benches,” and lay their heads on his bosom. “Once more we will sing,” he concluded, “that we may give you time.” And again they sung a hymn.
The other two priests stood up and started to sing a hymn. It took a few seconds for the congregation to join in as usual; every face turned up looked pale and filled with horror. When the singing stopped, another priest took center stage and began in a soft, affectionate tone, asking the congregation if what their dear brother had said had touched their hearts? Whether they would avoid the hell he had made them see? “Come, then!” he continued, stretching out his arms toward them, “come to us, and tell us so, and we will help you see Jesus, the dear gentle Jesus, who will save you from it. But you have to come to him! You must not be ashamed to come to him! Tonight you will tell him that you are not ashamed of him; we will make room for you; we will clear the bench for anxious sinners to sit on. Come, then! Come to the anxious bench, and we will show you Jesus! Come! Come! Come!” Again, a hymn was sung, and while it continued, one of the three was busy clearing away a couple of long benches that ran across the rail, guiding people back to the lower part of the church. The singing stopped, and once more the people were invited and urged not to be ashamed of Jesus, but to take their place on “the anxious benches,” and lay their heads on his chest. “Once more we will sing,” he concluded, “to give you time.” And again they sang a hymn.
And now in every part of the church a movement was perceptible, slight at first, but by degrees becoming more decided. Young girls arose, and sat down, and rose again; and then the pews opened, and several came tottering out, their hands clasped, their heads hanging on their bosoms, and every limb trembling, and still the hymn went on; but as the poor creatures approached the rail their sobs and groans became audible. They seated themselves on the “anxious benches;” the hymn ceased, and two of the three priests walked down from the tribune, and going, one to the right, and the other to the left, began whispering to the poor tremblers seated there. These whispers were inaudible to us, but the sobs and groans increased to a frightful excess. Young creatures, with features pale and distorted, fell on their knees on the pavement, and soon sunk forward on their faces; the most violent cries and shrieks followed, while from time to time a voice was heard in convulsive accents, exclaiming, “Oh Lord!” “Oh Lord Jesus!” “Help me, Jesus!” and the like.
And now there was a noticeable stir throughout the church, starting off small but gradually getting more intense. Young girls stood up, sat down, and stood up again; then the pews opened, and several women stumbled out, their hands clasped, heads bowed, and bodies shaking, while the hymn continued. As they approached the altar rail, their sobs and groans became clear. They settled onto the “anxious benches,” the hymn stopped, and two of the three priests came down from the pulpit, one heading to the right and the other to the left, beginning to speak softly to the trembling individuals seated there. We couldn't hear their whispers, but the sobs and groans escalated horrifyingly. Young women, their faces pale and twisted, fell to their knees on the floor, soon collapsing forward onto their faces; loud cries and screams erupted, and every so often a voice could be heard in broken tones, shouting, “Oh Lord!” “Oh Lord Jesus!” “Help me, Jesus!” and similar pleas.
Meanwhile the two priests continued to walk among them; they repeatedly mounted on the benches, and trumpet-mouthed proclaimed to the whole congregation, “the tidings of salvation,” and then from every corner of the building arose in reply, short sharp cries of “Amen!” “Glory!” “Amen!” while the prostrate penitents continued to receive whispered comfortings, and from time to time a mystic caress. More than once I saw a young neck encircled by a reverend arm. Violent hysterics and convulsions seized many of them, and when the tumult was at the highest, the priest who remained above, again gave out a hymn as if to drown it.
Meanwhile, the two priests kept walking among the people; they climbed onto the benches and loudly proclaimed to the entire congregation, “the news of salvation,” and then from every corner of the building came sharp cries of “Amen!” “Glory!” “Amen!” while the kneeling penitents continued to receive whispered words of comfort, and occasionally a mysterious touch. More than once, I saw a young neck wrapped in a reverend arm. Many of them were gripped by violent hysteria and convulsions, and when the chaos peaked, the priest who remained above started singing a hymn again as if to drown it out.
It was a frightful sight to behold innocent young creatures, in the gay morning of existence, thus seized upon, horror struck, and rendered feeble and enervated for ever. One young girl, apparently not more than fourteen, was supported in the arms of another, some years older; her face was pale as death; her eyes wide open, and perfectly devoid of meaning; her chin and bosom wet with slaver; she had every appearance of idiotism. I saw a priest approach her, he took her delicate hand, “Jesus is with her! Bless the Lord!” he said, and passed on.
It was a terrifying sight to see innocent young beings, in the bright morning of their lives, suddenly overwhelmed, horrified, and left weak and helpless forever. One young girl, seemingly no more than fourteen, was being held up by another girl a few years older; her face was as pale as death; her eyes were wide open, completely devoid of understanding; her chin and chest were wet with drool; she looked completely vacant. I saw a priest come over to her, take her delicate hand, and say, “Jesus is with her! Bless the Lord!” before moving on.
Did the men of America value their women as men ought to value their wives and daughters, would such scenes be permitted among them?
Did the men of America appreciate their women the way men should value their wives and daughters, would such scenes be allowed among them?
It is hardly necessary to say that all who obeyed the call to place themselves on the “anxious benches” were women, and by far the greater number very young women. The congregation was, in general, extremely well dressed, and the smartest and most fashionable ladies of the town were there; during the whole revival the churches and meeting-houses were every day crowded with well dressed people.
It’s hardly worth mentioning that everyone who responded to the invitation to sit on the “anxious benches” was female, with most being quite young. The congregation was generally very well dressed, and the most stylish and fashionable women in town were present; throughout the entire revival, the churches and meeting houses were filled every day with well-dressed people.
It is thus the ladies of Cincinnati amuse themselves; to attend the theatre is forbidden; to play cards is unlawful; but they work hard in their families, and must have some relaxation. For myself, I confess that I think the coarsest comedy ever written would be a less detestable exhibition for the eyes of youth and innocence than such a scene.
It’s how the women of Cincinnati keep themselves entertained; going to the theater is off-limits; playing cards is not allowed; but they put in a lot of effort at home and need some downtime. As for me, I admit that I believe the most crude comedy ever written would be a less awful sight for the eyes of the young and innocent than what I’ve just witnessed.
CHAPTER IX
Schools—Climate—Water Melons—Fourth of July—Storms—Pigs—Moving Houses—Mr. Flint—Literature
Schools—Climate—Watermelons—4th of July—Storms—Pigs—Moving Houses—Mr. Flint—Literature
Cincinnati contains many schools, but of their rank or merit I had very little opportunity of judging; the only one which I visited was kept by Dr. Lock, a gentleman who appears to have liberal and enlarged opinions on the subject of female education. Should his system produce practical results proportionably excellent, the ladies of Cincinnati will probably some years hence be much improved in their powers of companionship. I attended the annual public exhibition at this school, and perceived, with some surprise, that the higher branches of science were among the studies of the pretty creatures I saw assembled there. One lovely girl of sixteen took her degree in mathematics, and another was examined in moral philosophy. They blushed so sweetly, and looked so beautifully puzzled and confounded, that it might have been difficult for an abler judge than I was to decide how far they merited the diploma they received.
Cincinnati has many schools, but I had very little chance to judge their quality. The only one I visited was run by Dr. Lock, a man who seems to have open and progressive views on female education. If his approach yields equally impressive results, the women of Cincinnati will likely be much improved in their social skills in a few years. I attended the annual public exhibition at this school and was surprised to see that advanced subjects were among the studies of the young women gathered there. One beautiful sixteen-year-old received her degree in mathematics, and another was examined in moral philosophy. They blushed charmingly and looked adorably confused, making it hard for anyone more qualified than I to determine how well they deserved the diploma they were awarded.
This method of letting young ladies graduate, and granting them diplomas on quitting the establishment, was quite new to me; at least, I do not remember to have heard of any thing similar elsewhere. I should fear that the time allowed to the fair graduates of Cincinnati for the acquirement of these various branches of education would seldom be sufficient to permit their reaching the eminence in each which their enlightened instructor anticipates. “A quarter’s” mathematics, or “two quarters” political economy, moral philosophy, algebra, and quadratic equations, would seldom, I should think, enable the teacher and the scholar, by their joint efforts, to lay in such a stock of these sciences as would stand the wear and tear of half a score of children, and one help.
This way of allowing young women to graduate and giving them diplomas when they leave the school was completely new to me; at least, I don't recall hearing about anything like it anywhere else. I worry that the time the graduates in Cincinnati have to master these different subjects would rarely be enough for them to reach the level of excellence that their insightful teacher expects. A quarter's worth of math or two quarters of political economy, moral philosophy, algebra, and quadratic equations probably wouldn't equip the teacher and the student, through their combined efforts, with enough knowledge in these subjects to handle the challenges of raising several children and one extra help.
Towards the end of May we began to feel that we were in a climate warmer than any we had been accustomed to, and my son suffered severely from the effects of it. A bilious complaint, attended by a frightful degree of fever, seized him, and for some days we feared for his life. The treatment he received was, I have no doubt, judicious, but the quantity of calomel prescribed was enormous. I asked one day how many grains I should prepare, and was told to give half a teaspoonful. The difference of climate must, I imagine, make a difference in the effect of this drug, or the practice of the old and new world could hardly differ so widely as it does in the use of it. Anstey, speaking of the Bath physicians, says,
Towards the end of May, we started to feel like we were in a climate much warmer than we were used to, and my son suffered greatly because of it. He developed a serious illness accompanied by a terrible fever, and for several days we were really worried for his life. The treatment he received was, I’m sure, sensible, but the amount of calomel prescribed was massive. One day I asked how many grains I should prepare, and I was told to give half a teaspoonful. I imagine the change in climate must influence how this drug works, or else the medical practices between the old and the new world couldn’t be so different in how they use it. Anstey, talking about the Bath doctors, says,
“No one e’er viewed
Any one of the medical gentlemen stewed.”
“No one ever saw
Any of the doctors drunk.”
But I can vouch, upon my own experience, that no similar imputation lies against the gentlemen who prescribe large quantities of calomel in America. To give one instance in proof of this, when I was afterwards in Montgomery county, near Washington, a physician attended one of our neighbours, and complained that he was himself unwell. “You must take care of yourself, Doctor,” said the patient; “I do so,” he replied, “I took forty grains of calomel yesterday, and I feel better than I did.” Repeated and violent bleeding was also had recourse to in the case of my son, and in a few days he was able to leave his room, but he was dreadfully emaciated, and it was many weeks before he recovered his strength.
But I can confirm, based on my own experience, that no similar accusation applies to the doctors in America who prescribe large doses of calomel. To give one example, when I was later in Montgomery County, near Washington, a doctor attended to one of our neighbors and mentioned that he himself was feeling unwell. “You need to take care of yourself, Doctor,” said the patient. “I am,” he replied, “I took forty grains of calomel yesterday, and I feel better than I did.” My son also underwent repeated and severe bleeding, and after a few days, he was able to leave his room, but he was extremely weak, and it took many weeks for him to regain his strength.
As the heat of the weather increased we heard of much sickness around us. The city is full of physicians, and they were all to be seen driving about in their cabs at a very alarming rate. One of these gentlemen told us, that when a medical man intended settling in a new situation, he always, if he knew his business, walked through the streets at nights, before he decided. If he saw the dismal twinkle of the watch-light from many windows he might be sure that disease was busy, and the the “location” might suit him well. Judging, by this criterion, Cincinnati was far from healthy, I began to fear for our health, and determined to leave the city; but, for a considerable time I found it impossible to procure a dwelling out of it. There were many boarding-houses in the vicinity, but they were all overflowing with guests. We were advised to avoid, as much as possible, walking out in the heat of the day; but the mornings and evenings were delightful, particularly the former, if taken sufficiently early. For several weeks I was never in bed after four o’clock, and at this hour I almost daily accompanied my “help” to market, where the busy novelty of the scene afforded me much amusement.
As the weather got hotter, we started hearing about a lot of illness around us. The city was packed with doctors, and they could be seen racing around in their cabs at a pretty alarming speed. One of these doctors told us that when a medical professional planned to settle in a new place, he always, if he knew what he was doing, walked the streets at night before making a decision. If he spotted the gloomy glow of watch-lights from many windows, he could be sure that illness was rampant, and the “location” might be a good fit for him. Judging by this standard, Cincinnati was not very healthy at all, and I began to worry about our health, deciding we needed to leave the city. However, I found it really difficult to find a place outside of it for quite some time. There were many boarding houses nearby, but they were all packed with guests. We were advised to avoid walking out during the hottest parts of the day as much as possible; however, the mornings and evenings were lovely, especially the mornings if you got up early enough. For several weeks, I was never in bed after four o'clock, and at that hour, I almost daily went with my “help” to the market, where the hustle and bustle of the scene provided me with plenty of entertainment.
Many waggon-loads of enormous water-melons were brought to market every day, and I was sure to see groups of men, women, and children seated on the pavement round the spot where they were sold, sucking in prodigious quantities of this water-fruit. Their manner of devouring them is extremely unpleasant; the huge fruit is cut into half a dozen sections, of about a foot long, and then, dripping as it is with water, applied to the mouth, from either side of which pour copious streams of the fluid, while, ever and anon, a mouthful of the hard black seeds are shot out in all directions, to the great annoyance of all within reach. When I first tasted this fruit I thought it very vile stuff indeed, but before the end of the season we all learned to like it. When taken with claret and sugar it makes delicious wine and water.
Every day, tons of huge watermelons were brought to the market, and I would always see groups of men, women, and children sitting on the sidewalk around where they were sold, indulging in massive amounts of this juicy fruit. Their way of eating it is quite messy; the large fruit is cut into about six sections, each about a foot long, and then, dripping with juice, it’s held up to their mouths, causing streams of liquid to pour out from both sides, while every now and then, they spit out mouthfuls of hard black seeds in every direction, much to the annoyance of everyone nearby. When I first tried this fruit, I thought it was pretty gross, but by the end of the season, we all grew to like it. When mixed with claret and sugar, it makes a delicious wine and water.
It is the custom for the gentlemen to go to market at Cincinnati; the smartest men in the place, and those of the “highest standing” do not scruple to leave their beds with the sun, six days in the week, and, prepared with a mighty basket, to sally forth in search of meat, butter, eggs and vegetables. I have continually seen them returning, with their weighty basket on one arm and an enormous ham depending from the other.
It’s a tradition for the men to go to the market in Cincinnati; the smartest guys in town, and those with the “highest status,” don’t hesitate to get up with the sun six days a week, armed with a big basket, to head out for meat, butter, eggs, and vegetables. I’ve often seen them coming back with their heavy basket on one arm and a huge ham hanging from the other.
And now arrived the 4th of July, that greatest of all American festivals. On the 4th of July, 1776, the declaration of their independence was signed, at the State-house in Philadelphia.
And now it’s the 4th of July, the biggest American holiday. On July 4th, 1776, the declaration of independence was signed at the State House in Philadelphia.
To me, the dreary coldness and want of enthusiasm in American manners is one of their greatest defects, and I therefore hailed the demonstrations of general feeling which this day elicits with real pleasure. On the 4th of July the hearts of the people seem to awaken from a three hundred and sixty-four days’ sleep; they appear high-spirited, gay, animated, social, generous, or at least liberal in expense; and would they but refrain from spitting on that hallowed day, I should say, that on the 4th of July, at least, they appeared to be an amiable people. It is true that the women have but little to do with the pageantry, the splendour, or the gaiety of the day; but, setting this defect aside, it was indeed a glorious sight to behold a jubilee so heartfelt as this; and had they not the bad taste and bad feeling to utter an annual oration, with unvarying abuse of the mother country, to say nothing of the warlike manifesto called Declaration of Independence, our gracious king himself might look upon the scene and say that it was good; nay, even rejoice, that twelve millions of bustling bodies, at four thousand miles distance from his throne and his altars, should make their own laws, and drink their own tea, after the fashion that pleased them best.
To me, the coldness and lack of enthusiasm in American behavior is one of their biggest flaws, which is why I genuinely enjoyed the expressions of collective emotion that this day brings. On the 4th of July, it feels like the hearts of the people wake up from a three hundred sixty-four-day slumber; they seem lively, cheerful, animated, sociable, generous, or at least willing to spend money; and if only they would refrain from spitting on that sacred day, I'd say that, at least on the 4th of July, they seem to be a friendly people. It's true that women have little involvement in the festivities, the spectacle, or the joy of the day; but putting that aside, it was really a glorious sight to witness a celebration so heartfelt as this; and if they didn’t have the poor taste and insensitivity to give an annual speech filled with constant criticism of the mother country, not to mention the warlike declaration called the Declaration of Independence, our gracious king himself might look at the scene and find it good; in fact, he might even rejoice that twelve million bustling individuals, four thousand miles away from his throne and temples, are making their own laws and enjoying their own tea in the way that suits them best.
One source of deep interest to us, in this new clime, was the frequent recurrence of thunderstorms. Those who have only listened to thunder in England have but a faint idea of the language which the gods speak when they are angry. Thomson’s description, however, will do: it is hardly possible that words can better paint the spectacle, or more truly echo to the sound, than his do. The only point he does not reach is the vast blaze of rose-coloured light that ever and anon sets the landscape on fire.
One thing that really caught our attention in this new place was the frequent thunderstorms. People who have only heard thunder in England have a limited understanding of how the gods express their anger. Thomson’s description captures it well; it’s hard to imagine words painting the scene or resonating with the sound any better than his. The only aspect he misses is the intense burst of pinkish light that periodically illuminates the landscape.
In reading this celebrated description in America, and observing how admirably true it was to nature there, I seemed to get a glimpse at a poet’s machinery, and to perceive, that in order to produce effect he must give his images more vast than he finds them in nature; but the proportions must be just, and the colouring true. Every thing seems colossal on this great continent; if it rains, if it blows, if it thunders, it is all done fortissimo; but I often felt terror yield to wonder and delight, so grand, so glorious were the scenes a storm exhibited. Accidents are certainly more frequent than with us, but not so much so as reasonably to bring terror home to one’s bosom every time a mass of lurid clouds is seen rolling up against the wind.
In reading this famous description of America and seeing how incredibly true it was to nature there, I felt like I was getting a glimpse into a poet’s creative process. I realized that to create an impact, a poet has to make his images bigger than what he finds in nature; but the proportions must be right, and the colors must be accurate. Everything seems enormous on this great continent; when it rains, blows, or thunders, it all happens at full intensity; however, I often found that fear gave way to awe and delight because the scenes displayed during a storm were so grand and glorious. Accidents do happen more often than here, but it’s not enough to make you feel terror every time you see ominous clouds gathering against the wind.
It seems hardly fair to quarrel with a place because its staple commodity is not pretty, but I am sure I should have liked Cincinnati much better if the people had not dealt so very largely in hogs. The immense quantity of business done in this line would hardly be believed by those who had not witnessed it. I never saw a newspaper without remarking such advertisements as the following:
It seems almost unfair to criticize a place just because its main product isn't appealing, but I know I would have liked Cincinnati a lot more if the people weren't so involved in the hog trade. The sheer volume of business in this area would be hard to believe for those who haven't seen it. I never picked up a newspaper without noticing ads like these:
“Wanted, immediately, 4,000 fat hogs.”
“For sale, 2,000 barrels of prime pork.”
“Wanted, immediately, 4,000 fat hogs.”
“For sale, 2,000 barrels of premium pork.”
But the annoyance came nearer than this; if I determined upon a walk up Main-street, the chances were five hundred to one against my reaching the shady side without brushing by a snout fresh dripping from the kennel; when we had screwed our courage to the enterprise of mounting a certain noble looking sugar-loaf hill, that promised pure air and a fine view, we found the brook we had to cross, at its foot, red with the stream from a pig slaughter house; while our noses, instead of meeting “the thyme that loves the green hill’s breast,” were greeted by odours that I will not describe, and which I heartily hope my readers cannot imagine; our feet, that on leaving the city had expected to press the flowery sod, literally got entangled in pigs’ tails and jaw-bones: and thus the prettiest walk in the neighbourhood was interdicted for ever.
But the annoyance was even closer than that; if I decided to walk up Main Street, the odds were five hundred to one that I would end up brushing past a fresh snout dripping from the gutter. When we finally gathered the courage to tackle a certain noble-looking sugarloaf hill, promising fresh air and a great view, we discovered that the brook we had to cross at its base was tainted red from a pig slaughterhouse. Instead of taking in "the thyme that loves the green hill’s breast," we were met with smells that I won't describe and which I genuinely hope my readers can't imagine. Our feet, which had anticipated stepping on flowery ground, got tangled in pig tails and jaw bones. Thus, the prettiest walk in the neighborhood was forever off-limits.
One of the sights to stare at in America is that of houses moving from place to place. We were often amused by watching this exhibition of mechanical skill in the streets. They make no difficulty of moving dwellings from one part of the town to another. Those I saw travelling were all of them frame-houses, that is, built wholly of wood, except the chimneys; but it is said that brick buildings are sometimes treated in the same manner. The largest dwelling that I saw in motion was one containing two stories of four rooms each; forty oxen were yoked to it. The first few yards brought down the two stacks of chimneys, but it afterwards went on well. The great difficulties were the first getting it in motion and the stopping exactly in the right place. This locomotive power was extremely convenient at Cincinnati, as the constant improvements going on there made it often desirable to change a wooden dwelling for one of brick; and whenever this happened, we were sure to see the ex No.100 of Main-street or the ex No.55 of Second street creeping quietly out of town, to take possession of a humble suburban station on the common above it.
One of the things to see in America is houses being moved from one place to another. We often found it entertaining to watch this display of mechanical skill on the streets. They have no trouble relocating homes from one area of town to another. The ones I saw being moved were all frame houses, meaning they were entirely made of wood, except for the chimneys; however, I’ve heard that brick buildings can sometimes be moved the same way. The biggest house I saw in motion had two stories with four rooms each; it was pulled by forty oxen. The first few yards took down the two chimney stacks, but it eventually went smoothly after that. The biggest challenges were getting it started and stopping exactly where it needed to be. This moving ability was really handy in Cincinnati, where constant upgrades made it often necessary to swap a wooden house for a brick one; and whenever it happened, we could always see the former No.100 of Main Street or the former No.55 of Second Street quietly leaving town to settle at a modest suburban site on the common above.
The most agreeable acquaintance I made in Cincinnati, and indeed one of the most talented men I ever met, was Mr. Flint, the author of several extremely clever volumes, and the editor of the Western Monthly Review. His conversational powers are of the highest order: he is the only person I remember to have known with first rate powers of satire, and even of sarcasm, whose kindness of nature and of manner remained perfectly uninjured. In some of his critical notices there is a strength and keenness second to nothing of the kind I have ever read. He is a warm patriot, and so true-hearted an American, that we could not always be of the same opinion on all the subjects we discussed; but whether it were the force and brilliancy of his language, his genuine and manly sincerity of feeling, or his bland and gentleman-like manner that beguiled me, I know not, but certainly he is the only American I ever listened to whose unqualified praise of his country did not appear to me somewhat overstrained and ridiculous.
The most pleasant person I met in Cincinnati, and honestly one of the most talented individuals I've ever encountered, was Mr. Flint, the author of several incredibly clever books and the editor of the Western Monthly Review. He has exceptional conversational skills: he's the only person I remember knowing who had top-notch abilities in satire and even sarcasm, while still being genuinely kind and approachable. In some of his critical pieces, there's a strength and sharpness that I haven't seen anywhere else. He is a passionate patriot and such a sincere American that we didn’t always agree on every topic we discussed; however, whether it was the power and brilliance of his language, his genuine and heartfelt sincerity, or his smooth and gentlemanly demeanor that won me over, I can't say for sure, but he is definitely the only American I've ever listened to whose unreserved praise for his country didn’t seem a bit exaggerated or ridiculous to me.
On one occasion, but not at the house of Mr. Flint, I passed an evening in company with a gentleman said to be a scholar and a man of reading; he was also what is called a serious gentleman, and he appeared to have pleasure in feeling that his claim to distinction was acknowledged in both capacities. There was a very amiable serious lady in the company, to whom he seemed to trust for the development of his celestial pretensions, and to me he did the honour of addressing most of his terrestrial superiority. The difference between us was, that when he spoke to her, he spoke as to a being who, if not his equal, was at least deserving high distinction; and he gave her smiles, such as Michael might have vouchsafed to Eve. To me he spoke as Paul to the offending Jews; he did not, indeed, shake his raiment at me, but he used his pocket-handkerchief so as to answer the purpose; and if every sentence did not end with “I am clean,” pronounced by his lips, his tone, his look, his action, fully supplied the deficiency.
On one occasion, but not at Mr. Flint's house, I spent an evening with a gentleman who was said to be a scholar and an avid reader; he was also what you’d call a serious gentleman, and he seemed to take pleasure in having his status recognized in both ways. There was a very nice serious lady in the group, whom he seemed to rely on for showcasing his lofty pretensions, and he honored me by directing most of his talk about his earthly superiority toward me. The difference between us was that when he spoke to her, he treated her as someone who, if not his equal, at least deserved high regard; he smiled at her in a way that might remind you of how Michael would have smiled at Eve. When he spoke to me, it was more like how Paul addressed the offending Jews; he didn't literally shake his garments at me, but he used his handkerchief in a similar fashion; and while not every sentence ended with “I am clean,” the way he spoke, looked at me, and acted fully made up for that.
Our poor Lord Byron, as may be supposed, was the bull’s-eye against which every dart in his black little quiver was aimed. I had never heard any serious gentleman talk of Lord Byron at full length before, and I listened attentively. It was evident that the noble passages which are graven on the hearts of the genuine lovers of poetry had altogether escaped the serious gentleman’s attention; and it was equally evident that he knew by rote all those that they wish the mighty master had never written. I told him so, and I shall not soon forget the look he gave me.
Our poor Lord Byron, as you'd expect, was the target for every criticism in his dark little quiver. I had never heard a serious gentleman speak about Lord Byron in such depth before, and I listened closely. It was clear that the beautiful lines that resonate with true poetry lovers had completely missed his attention; and it was equally clear that he had memorized all the ones they wish the great master had never penned. I mentioned this to him, and I won’t soon forget the look he gave me.
Of other authors his knowledge was very imperfect, but his criticisms very amusing. Of Pope, he said, “He is so entirely gone by, that in our country it is considered quite fustian to speak of him”
Of other authors, he didn't know much, but his critiques were quite entertaining. About Pope, he said, “He's so completely forgotten that in our country, it's seen as completely outdated to talk about him.”
But I persevered, and named “the Rape of the Lock” as evincing some little talent, and being in a tone that might still hope for admittance in the drawing-room; but, on the mention of this poem, the serious gentleman became almost as strongly agitated as when he talked of Don Juan; and I was unfeignedly at a loss to comprehend the nature of his feelings, till he muttered, with an indignant shake of the handkerchief, “The very title!”
But I kept going and referred to “the Rape of the Lock” as showing some talent and being in a tone that could still hope for acceptance in the living room; however, when this poem came up, the serious gentleman became almost as agitated as when he spoke about Don Juan; and I was honestly confused about the nature of his feelings until he muttered, shaking his handkerchief indignantly, “The very title!”
At the name of Dryden he smiled, and the smile spoke as plainly as a smile could speak, “How the old woman twaddles!”
At the mention of Dryden, he smiled, and the smile clearly conveyed, “What a silly old woman!”
“We only know Dryden by quotations. Madam, and these, indeed, are found only in books that have long since had their day.”
“We only know Dryden through quotes. Ma'am, and these are really only found in books that have long since gone out of style.”
“And Shakspeare, sir?”
“And Shakespeare, sir?”
“Shakspeare, Madam, is obscene, and, thank God, WE are sufficiently advanced to have found it out! If we must have the abomination of stage plays, let them at least be marked by the refinement of the age in which we live.”
“Shakespeare, ma'am, is inappropriate, and thank God we've progressed enough to realize that! If we have to endure the monstrosity of stage plays, at least let them reflect the refinement of the times we live in.”
This was certainly being au courant du jour.
This was definitely on trend.
Of Massenger he knew nothing. Of Ford he had never heard. Gray had had his day. Prior he had never read, but understood he was a very childish writer. Chaucer and Spenser he tied in a couple, and dismissed by saying, that he thought it was neither more nor less than affectation to talk of authors who wrote in a tongue no longer intelligible.
Of Massenger, he knew nothing. He had never heard of Ford. Gray had had his moment in the spotlight. He had never read Prior but understood he was a pretty immature writer. He grouped Chaucer and Spenser together and dismissed them, saying he thought it was just pretentious to discuss authors who wrote in a language that was no longer understandable.
This was the most literary conversation I was ever present at in Cincinnati.[1]
This was the most literary conversation I had ever been part of in Cincinnati.[1]
[1] The pleasant, easy, unpretending talk on all subjects, which I enjoyed in Mr. Flint’s family, was an exception to every thing else I met at Cincinnati.
[1] The friendly, relaxed, straightforward conversations on various topics that I had with Mr. Flint's family were a refreshing change from everything else I encountered in Cincinnati.
In truth, there are many reasons which render a very general diffusion of literature impossible in America. I can scarcely class the universal reading of newspapers as an exception to this remark; if I could, my statement would be exactly the reverse, and I should say that America beat the world in letters. The fact is, that throughout all ranks of society, from the successful merchant, which is the highest, to the domestic serving man, which is the lowest, they are all too actively employed to read, except at such broken moments as may suffice for a peep at a newspaper. It is for this reason, I presume, that every American newspaper is more or less a magazine, wherein the merchant may scan while he holds out his hand for an invoice, “Stanzas by Mrs. Hemans,” or a garbled extract from Moore’s Life of Byron; the lawyer may study his brief faithfully, and yet contrive to pick up the valuable dictum of some American critic, that “Bulwer’s novels are decidedly superior to Sir Walter Scott’s;” nay, even the auctioneer may find time, as he bustles to his tub, or his tribune, to support his pretensions to polite learning, by glancing his quick eye over the columns, and reading that “Miss Mitford’s descriptions are indescribable.” If you buy a yard of ribbon, the shopkeeper lays down his newspaper, perhaps two or three, to measure it. I have seen a brewer’s drayman perched on the shaft of his dray and reading one newspaper, while another was tucked under his arm; and I once went into the cottage of a country shoemaker, of the name of Harris, where I saw a newspaper half full of “original” poetry, directed to Madison F. Harris. To be sure of the fact, I asked the man if his name were Madison. “Yes, Madam, Madison Franklin Harris is my name.” The last and the lyre divided his time, I fear too equally, for he looked pale and poor.
In reality, there are many reasons that make widespread access to literature impossible in America. I can hardly consider the universal reading of newspapers an exception to this observation; if I could, my point would be the exact opposite, and I would argue that America excels in literature. The truth is, across all levels of society, from the successful merchant at the top to the domestic servant at the bottom, everyone is too busy to read except during the brief moments they can spare for a quick look at a newspaper. I assume this is why every American newspaper is somewhat like a magazine, where the merchant can glance at “Stanzas by Mrs. Hemans” or a mixed-up excerpt from Moore’s Life of Byron while waiting for an invoice, the lawyer can diligently review his brief while also catching a notable comment from some American critic that “Bulwer’s novels are definitely better than Sir Walter Scott’s,” and even the auctioneer can take a moment, as he rushes to his podium, to enhance his claims of being well-read by quickly scanning the columns to read that “Miss Mitford’s descriptions are indescribable.” If you buy a yard of ribbon, the shopkeeper will set down his newspaper—maybe even two or three—to measure it. I’ve seen a brewer’s delivery driver sitting on the shaft of his cart reading one newspaper while tucking another under his arm; and I once entered the home of a country shoemaker named Harris, where I found a newspaper filled with “original” poetry addressed to Madison F. Harris. To confirm, I asked the man if his name was Madison. “Yes, ma’am, Madison Franklin Harris is my name.” The last and the lyre shared his time, I fear, too equally, as he looked pale and poor.
This, I presume, is what is meant by the general diffusion of knowledge, so boasted of in the United States; such as it is, the diffusion of it is general enough, certainly; but I greatly doubt its being advantageous to the population.
This, I assume, is what people mean by the wide spread of knowledge that is so proudly claimed in the United States; as it is, the spread of it is definitely widespread; however, I seriously doubt that it benefits the population.
The only reading men I met with were those who made letters their profession; and of these, there were some who would hold a higher rank in the great Republic (not of America, but of letters), did they write for persons less given to the study of magazines and newspapers; and they might hold a higher rank still, did they write for the few and not for the many. I was always drawing a parallel, perhaps a childish one, between the external and internal deficiency of polish and of elegance in the native volumes of the country. Their compositions have not that condensation of thought, or that elaborate finish, which the consciousness of writing for the scholar and the man of taste is calculated to give; nor have their dirty blue paper and slovenly types[2] the polished elegance that fits a volume for the hand or the eye of the fastidious epicure in literary enjoyment. The first book I bought in America was the “Chronicles of the Cannongate.” In asking the price, I was agreeably surprised to hear a dollar and a half named, being about one sixth of what I used to pay for its fellows in England; but on opening the grim pages, it was long before I could again call them cheap. To be sure the pleasure of a bright well-printed page ought to be quite lost sight of in the glowing, galloping, bewitching course that the imagination sets out upon with a new Waverley novel; and so it was with me till I felt the want of it; and then I am almost ashamed to confess how often, in turning the thin dusky pages, my poor earth-born spirit paused in its pleasure, to sigh for hot-pressed wire-wove.
The only readers I encountered were those who made a career out of writing; among them, there were some who would have a higher status in the great Republic (not the one in America, but that of literature) if they wrote for people less obsessed with magazines and newspapers. They could achieve even greater respect if they wrote for a select few instead of the masses. I often drew a comparison, perhaps a naive one, between the superficial and deeper lack of refinement and elegance in the homegrown books of the country. Their works lack the depth of thought and the polished finish that comes from writing for scholars and discerning readers; nor do their cheap blue paper and messy types carry the refined elegance suited for the hands or eyes of a sophisticated literary connoisseur. The first book I purchased in America was the “Chronicles of the Cannongate.” When I asked for the price, I was pleasantly surprised to hear it was a dollar and a half, about a sixth of what I used to pay for similar books in England; but when I opened the dull pages, it took a long time before I could once again think of them as a bargain. Of course, the enjoyment of a beautifully printed page should be completely overshadowed by the exciting, enchanting journey that the imagination takes when diving into a new Waverley novel; and so it was for me until I felt the lack of it; and then I'm almost embarrassed to admit how often, as I flipped through the thin, dark pages, my poor earthly soul paused in its enjoyment to long for nice paper.
[2] I must make an exception in favour of the American Quarterly Review. To the eye of the body it is in all respects exactly the same thing as the English Quarterly Review.
[2] I have to make an exception for the American Quarterly Review. For all practical purposes, it looks exactly the same as the English Quarterly Review.
CHAPTER X
Removal to the country—Walk in the forest—Equality
Removal to the country—Walk in the woods—Equality
At length my wish of obtaining a house in the country was gratified. A very pretty cottage, the residence of a gentleman who was removing into town, for the convenience of his business as a lawyer, was to let, and I immediately secured it. It was situated in a little village about a mile and a half from the town, close to the foot of the hills formerly mentioned as the northern boundary of it. We found ourselves much more comfortable here than in the city. The house was pretty and commodious, our sitting-rooms were cool and airy; we had got rid of the detestable mosquitoes, and we had an ice-house that never failed. Beside all this, we had the pleasure of gathering our tomatoes from our own garden, and receiving our milk from our own cow. Our manner of life was infinitely more to my taste than before; it gave us all the privileges of rusticity, which are fully as incompatible with a residence in a little town of Western America as with a residence in London. We lived on terms of primaeval intimacy with our cow, for if we lay down on our lawn she did not scruple to take a sniff at the book we were reading, but then she gave us her own sweet breath in return. The verge of the cool-looking forest that rose opposite our windows was so near, that we often used it as an extra drawing- room, and there was no one to wonder if we went out with no other preparation than our parasols, carrying books and work enough to while away a long summer day in the shade; the meadow that divided us from it was covered with a fine short grass, that continued for a little way under the trees, making a beautiful carpet, while sundry logs and stumps furnished our sofas and tables. But even this was not enough to satisfy us when we first escaped from the city, and we determined upon having a day’s enjoyment of the wildest forest scenery we could find. So we packed up books, albums, pencils, and sandwiches, and, despite a burning sun, dragged up a hill so steep that we sometimes fancied we could rest ourselves against it by only leaning forward a little. In panting and in groaning we reached the top, hoping to be refreshed by the purest breath of heaven; but to have tasted the breath of heaven we must have climbed yet farther, even to the tops of the trees themselves, for we soon found that the air beneath them stirred not, nor ever had stirred, as it seemed to us, since first it settled there, so heavily did it weigh upon our lungs.
At last, I got my wish of having a house in the country. A lovely cottage, belonging to a gentleman who was moving to town for his law practice, was available to rent, and I quickly secured it. It was located in a small village about a mile and a half from town, right at the foot of the hills I mentioned earlier as the northern boundary. We felt much more comfortable here than in the city. The house was charming and spacious; our sitting rooms were cool and airy. We were free from the annoying mosquitoes, and we had an ice-house that always kept things chilled. On top of that, we enjoyed picking our tomatoes from our own garden and getting our milk from our own cow. Our lifestyle was infinitely more to my liking than before; it gave us all the benefits of rural living, which are just as incompatible with life in a small town in Western America as they are with life in London. We developed a close bond with our cow, because if we lay down on the lawn, she didn’t hesitate to sniff the book we were reading, and in return, she shared her sweet breath with us. The edge of the cool-looking forest right outside our windows was so close that we often used it as an extra living room, without anyone batting an eye if we went out with nothing more than our parasols, bringing books and enough work to enjoy a long summer day in the shade. The meadow between us and the forest was covered in soft grass that stretched just a little way under the trees, creating a lovely carpet, while various logs and stumps served as our sofas and tables. But even this wasn’t enough to satisfy us after our escape from the city, so we decided to spend a day enjoying the wildest forest scenery we could find. We packed up books, albums, pencils, and sandwiches, and despite the blazing sun, we climbed a hill so steep that at times it felt like we could just lean forward a bit and rest against it. Breathing heavily and groaning, we finally reached the top, hoping to be refreshed by the purest air of heaven; but to truly taste that heavenly air, we would have needed to climb even higher, to the treetops, because we quickly discovered that the air beneath the trees was still and heavy, pressing down on our lungs as if it had been resting there since time began.
Still we were determined to enjoy ourselves, and forward we went, crunching knee deep through aboriginal leaves, hoping to reach some spot less perfectly airtight than our landing-place. Wearied with the fruitless search, we decided on reposing awhile on the trunk of a fallen tree; being all considerably exhausted, the idea of sitting down on this tempting log was conceived and executed simultaneously by the whole party, and the whole party sunk together through its treacherous surface into a mass of rotten rubbish that had formed part of the pith and marrow of the eternal forest a hundred years before.
Still, we were determined to have a good time, so we pushed on, crunching through leaves that were knee-deep, hoping to find a spot that was less sealed off than where we had landed. Tired from our fruitless search, we decided to rest for a while on the trunk of a fallen tree. Since we were all pretty exhausted, the idea of sitting down on this inviting log came to mind at the same time for everyone, and as a group, we all collapsed through its deceptive surface into a pile of decayed debris that had once been part of the heart of the ancient forest a hundred years earlier.
We were by no means the only sufferers by the accident; frogs, lizards, locusts, katiedids, beetles, and hornets, had the whole of their various tenements disturbed, and testified their displeasure very naturally by annoying us as much as possible in return; we were bit, we were stung, we were scratched; and when, at last, we succeeded in raising ourselves from the venerable ruin, we presented as woeful a spectacle as can well be imagined. We shook our (not ambrosial) garments, and panting with heat, stings, and vexation, moved a few paces from the scene of our misfortune, and again sat down; but this time it was upon the solid earth.
We definitely weren't the only ones affected by the accident; frogs, lizards, locusts, katydids, beetles, and hornets all had their homes disturbed and showed their annoyance by bothering us as much as they could in return. We were bitten, stung, and scratched; and when we finally managed to get ourselves up from the old ruins, we looked as miserable as could be. We shook off our (not so great) clothes and, panting from the heat, stings, and irritation, moved a few steps away from the spot where we had our mishap and sat down again; but this time it was on solid ground.
We had no sooner began to “chew the cud” of the bitter fancy that had beguiled us to these mountain solitudes than a new annoyance assailed us. A cloud of mosquitoes gathered round, and while each sharp proboscis sucked our blood, they teased us with their humming chorus, till we lost all patience, and started again on our feet, pretty firmly resolved never to try the al fresco joys of an American forest again. The sun was now in its meridian splendour, but our homeward path was short and down hill, so again packing up our preparations for felicity, we started homeward, or, more properly speaking, we started, for in looking for an agreeable spot in this dungeon forest we had advanced so far from the verge of the hill that we had lost all trace of the precise spot where we had entered it. Nothing was to be seen but multitudes of tall, slender, melancholy stems, as like as peas, and standing within a foot of each other. The ground, as far as the eye could reach (which certainly was not far), was covered with an unvaried bed of dried leaves; no trace, no track, no trail, as Mr. Cooper would call it, gave us a hint which way to turn; and having paused for a moment to meditate, we remembered that chance must decide for us at last, so we set forward, in no very good mood, to encounter new misfortunes. We walked about a quarter of a mile, and coming to a steep descent, we thought ourselves extremely fortunate, and began to scramble down, nothing doubting that it was the same we had scrambled up. In truth, nothing could be more like, but, alas! things that are like are not the same; when we had slipped and stumbled down to the edge of the wood, and were able to look beyond it, we saw no pretty cottage with the shadow of its beautiful acacias coming forward to meet us: all was different; and, what was worse, all was distant from the spot where we had hoped to be. We had come down the opposite side of the ridge, and had now to win our weary way a distance of three miles round its base, I believe we shall none of us ever forget that walk. The bright, glowing, furnace- like heat of the atmosphere seems to scorch as I recall it. It was painful to tread, it was painful to breathe, it was painful to look round; every object glowed with the reflection of the fierce tyrant that glared upon us from above.
We had barely started to think about the frustrating idea that had brought us to these mountain isolation spots when a new annoyance hit us. A swarm of mosquitoes circled around us, and as their sharp mouths sucked our blood, they harassed us with their buzzing chorus until we totally lost our patience. We got back on our feet, pretty determined never to experience the outdoors of an American forest again. The sun was now shining brightly at its peak, but our path home was short and downhill. So, after packing up our stuff for happiness, we began our way back. More accurately, we started over because, in searching for a nice spot in this gloomy forest, we had wandered so far from the edge of the hill that we had lost any sense of the exact spot where we had entered. All we could see were countless tall, slender, sad-looking plants, all standing a foot apart. The ground, as far as the eye could see (which wasn’t very far), was covered with a flat layer of dried leaves; there were no signs or footprints to guide us, and after pausing for a moment to think, we realized we would have to rely on chance, so we moved on, not in the best mood, ready to face more troubles. We walked about a quarter of a mile, and when we reached a steep drop, we thought we were really lucky and started scrambling down, confident it was the same path we had come up. In truth, it looked exactly the same, but, unfortunately, things that resemble each other are not always the same. When we finally slipped and stumbled down to the edge of the woods and could look beyond it, we didn’t see a charming cottage with the shadows of its lovely acacia trees welcoming us. Everything was different, and what was worse, everything was far away from where we had hoped to be. We had come down the opposite side of the ridge and now had to make our tired way three miles around its base. I believe none of us will ever forget that walk. The bright, oppressive, furnace-like heat of the air felt like it was burning me as I think back on it. It was painful to walk, painful to breathe, and painful to look around; every object shone with the reflection of the fierce sun glaring down at us.
We got home alive, which agreeably surprised us; and when our parched tongues again found power of utterance, we promised each other faithfully never to propose any more parties of pleasure in the grim store-like forests of Ohio.
We got home safe, which pleasantly surprised us; and when our dry throats finally found their voice again, we promised each other sincerely never to suggest any more fun outings in the gloomy, store-like forests of Ohio.
We were now in daily expectation of the arrival of Mr. T.; but day after day, and week after week passed by till we began to fear some untoward circumstance might delay his coming till the Spring; at last, when we had almost ceased to look out for him. on the road which led from the town, he arrived, late at night, by that which leads across the country from Pitzburgh. The pleasure we felt at seeing him was greatly increased by his bringing with him our eldest son, which was a happiness we had not hoped for. Our walks and our drives now became doubly interesting. The young men, fresh from a public school, found America so totally unlike all the nations with which their reading had made them acquainted, that it was indeed a new world to them. Had they visited Greece or Rome they would have encountered objects with whose images their minds had been long acquainted; or had they travelled to France or Italy they would have seen only what daily conversation had already rendered familiar; but at our public schools America (except perhaps as to her geographical position) is hardly better known than Fairy Land; and the American character has not been much more deeply studied than that of the Anthropophagi: all, therefore, was new, and every thing amusing.
We were now eagerly waiting for Mr. T. to arrive; but day after day, and week after week passed until we started to worry that something might delay his arrival until Spring. Finally, just when we had almost stopped looking for him on the road from town, he showed up late at night via the route that goes across the countryside from Pittsburgh. Our joy at seeing him was further heightened by the fact that he brought along our oldest son, which was a happiness we hadn’t anticipated. Our walks and drives became even more interesting. The young men, fresh from a public school, found America so completely different from all the countries their readings had familiarized them with that it truly felt like a new world. If they had visited Greece or Rome, they would have encountered images they were already familiar with; or if they had traveled to France or Italy, they would have only seen things that daily conversations had made known to them. But at our public schools, America (except perhaps in terms of its geographical position) is hardly better known than Fairy Land; and the American character is not much more studied than that of the Anthropophagi. So, everything was new, and everything was entertaining.
The extraordinary familiarity of our poor neighbours startled us at first, and we hardly knew how to receive their uncouth advances, or what was expected of us in return; however, it sometimes produced very laughable scenes. Upon one occasion two of my children set off upon an exploring walk up the hills; they were absent rather longer than we expected, and the rest of our party determined upon going out to meet them; we knew the direction they had taken, but thought it would be as well to enquire at a little public-house at the bottom of the hill, if such a pair had been seen to pass. A woman, whose appearance more resembled a Covent Garden market-woman than any thing else I can remember, came out and answered my question with the most jovial good humour in the affirmative, and prepared to join us in our search. Her look, her voice, her manner, were so exceedingly coarse and vehement, that she almost frightened me; she passed her arm within mine, and to the inexpressible amusement of my young people, she dragged me on, talking and questioning me without ceasing. She lived but a short distance from us, and I am sure intended to be a very good neighbour; but her violent intimacy made me dread to pass her door; my children, including my sons, she always addressed by their Christian names, excepting when she substituted the word “honey;” this familiarity of address, however, I afterwards found was universal throughout all ranks in the United States.
The surprising familiarity of our poor neighbors caught us off guard at first, and we weren’t sure how to respond to their blunt friendliness or what they expected in return; however, it sometimes led to very funny moments. One time, two of my kids went off on a hiking adventure in the hills; they were gone longer than we anticipated, so the rest of us decided to go look for them. We knew the direction they had taken but thought it would be a good idea to check at a little pub at the bottom of the hill to see if anyone had seen them. A woman who looked more like a market vendor from Covent Garden than anything else came out and confirmed she had seen them, in the most cheerful way possible, and offered to join us in the search. Her appearance, voice, and manner were so rough and energetic that she almost scared me; she linked her arm with mine and, to the great amusement of my kids, pulled me along, chatting and questioning me nonstop. She lived just a short distance away and I’m sure meant to be a good neighbor, but her over-familiarity made me hesitant to walk past her house; she always called my children, including my sons, by their first names, or sometimes even referred to them as “honey;” I later discovered that this kind of familiarity was common among all social classes in the United States.
My general appellation amongst my neighbours was “the English old woman,” but in mentioning each other they constantly employed the term “lady;” and they evidently had a pleasure in using it, for I repeatedly observed, that in speaking of a neighbour, instead of saying Mrs. Such-a-one, they described her as “the lady over the way what takes in washing,” or as “that there lady, out by the Gulley, what is making dip-candles.” Mr. Trollope was as constantly called “the old man,” while draymen, butchers’ boys, and the labourers on the canal were invariably denominated “them gentlemen;” nay, we once saw one of the most gentlemanlike men in Cincinnati introduce a fellow in dirty shirt sleeves, and all sorts of detestable et cetera, to one of his friends, with this formula, “D— let me introduce this gentleman to you.” Our respective titles certainly were not very important; but the eternal shaking hands with these ladies and gentlemen was really an annoyance, and the more so, as the near approach of the gentlemen was always redolent of whiskey and tobacco.
My general nickname among my neighbors was “the English old woman,” but when they referred to each other, they often used the term “lady.” They clearly enjoyed using it, as I noticed that instead of saying Mrs. Such-and-such, they would describe her as “the lady across the way who does laundry,” or “that lady out by the Gulley who makes dip candles.” Mr. Trollope was typically called “the old man,” while delivery drivers, butchers’ boys, and laborers at the canal were consistently referred to as “those gentlemen.” In fact, we once saw one of the most gentlemanly men in Cincinnati introduce a guy in a dirty shirt and all sorts of unpleasantness to one of his friends with, “D— let me introduce this gentleman to you.” Our respective titles weren’t that significant, but the constant handshaking with these ladies and gentlemen was really annoying, especially since getting close to the gentlemen always came with the smell of whiskey and tobacco.
But the point where this republican equality was the most distressing was in the long and frequent visitations that it produced. No one dreams of fastening a door in Western America; I was told that it would be considered as an affront by the whole neighbourhood. I was thus exposed to perpetual, and most vexatious interruptions from people whom I had often never seen, and whose names still oftener were unknown to me.
But the place where this idea of equality was the most frustrating was in the constant and frequent visits it led to. No one thinks about locking their door in the Western United States; I was told that it would be viewed as an insult by the entire neighborhood. I found myself subjected to endless and incredibly annoying interruptions from people I had often never met, and whose names I rarely even knew.
Those who are native there, and to the manner born, seem to pass over these annoyances with more skill than I could ever acquire. More than once I have seen some of my acquaintance beset in the same way, without appearing at all distressed by it; they continued their employment or conversation with me, much as if no such interruption had taken place; when the visitor entered, they would say, “How do you do?” and shake hands.
Those who are locals and used to the surroundings seem to handle these annoyances with more ease than I could ever learn. I've seen some of my friends caught up in the same situations, but they didn't seem bothered at all; they kept on with their work or conversation with me as if nothing had happened. When the visitor arrived, they would say, "How's it going?" and shake hands.
“Tolerable, I thank ye, how be you?” was the reply.
“Tolerable, thanks, how about you?” was the reply.
If it was a female, she took off her hat; if a male, he kept it on, and then taking possession of the first chair in their way, they would retain it for an hour together, without uttering another word; at length, rising abruptly, they would again shake hands, with, “Well, now I must be going, I guess,” and so take themselves off, apparently well contented with their reception.
If it was a woman, she would take off her hat; if it was a man, he would keep it on. Then, taking the first chair they encountered, they would hold onto it for about an hour without saying anything else. Eventually, they would get up suddenly, shake hands again, and say, “Well, I guess I should be going now,” and leave, seemingly pleased with how they were received.
I could never attain this philosophical composure; I could neither write nor read, and I always fancied I must talk to them. I will give the minutes of a conversation which I once set down after one of their visits, as a specimen of their tone and manner of speaking and thinking. My visitor was a milkman.
I could never achieve this philosophical calm; I couldn't read or write, and I always felt I had to talk to them. I'll share the notes from a conversation I recorded after one of their visits, as an example of their tone and way of speaking and thinking. My visitor was a milkman.
“Well now, so you be from the old country? Ay—you’ll see sights here, I guess.”
“Well, so you're from the old country? Yeah—you'll see some amazing things here, I guess.”
“I hope I shall see many.”
“I hope to see lots.”
“That’s a fact. I expect your little place of an island don’t grow such dreadful fine corn as you sees here?” [Corn always means Indian corn, or maize.]
"That's true. I doubt your small island grows such incredibly fine corn as what you see here?" [Corn always refers to Indian corn, or maize.]
“It grows no corn at all, sir.’”
“It doesn’t grow any corn at all, sir.”
“Possible! no wonder, then, that we reads such awful stories in the papers of your poor people being starved to death.”
“Is it possible! No wonder we read such terrible stories in the papers about your poor people being starved to death.”
“We have wheat, however.”
"We have wheat, though."
“Ay, for your rich folks, but I calculate the poor seldom gets a belly full.”
“Aye, for you wealthy people, but I think the poor rarely get a full meal.”
“You have certainly much greater abundance here.”
“You definitely have a lot more abundance here.”
“I expect so. Why they do say, that if a poor body contrives to be smart enough to scrape together a few dollars, that your King George always comes down upon ’em, and takes it all away. Don’t he?”
“I expect so. They say that if a poor person is clever enough to save up a few dollars, King George always comes down on them and takes it all away. Doesn’t he?”
“I do not remember hearing of such a transaction.”
“I don’t remember hearing about such a deal.”
“I guess they be pretty close about it. Your papers ben’t like ourn, I reckon? Now we says and prints just what we likes.”
“I guess they're pretty close about it. Your papers aren't like ours, right? We say and print exactly what we want.”
“You spend a good deal of time in reading the newspapers.”
"You spend a lot of time reading the news."
“And I’d like you to tell me how we can spend it better. How should freemen spend their time, but looking after their government, and watching that them fellers as we gives offices to, doos their duty, and gives themselves no airs?”
“And I’d like you to tell me how we can spend it better. How should free people spend their time, if not taking care of their government and making sure that the guys we give jobs to do their duty and don't act superior?”
“But I sometimes think, sir, that your fences might be in more thorough repair, and your roads in better order, if less time was spent in politics.”
“But I sometimes think, sir, that your fences could be in better shape and your roads in better condition if you spent less time on politics.”
“The Lord! to see how little you knows of a free country? Why, what’s the smoothness of a road, put against the freedom of a free-born American? And what does a broken zig-zag signify, comparable to knowing that the men what we have been pleased to send up to Congress, speaks handsome and straight, as we chooses they should?”
“The Lord! To see how little you know about a free country? What does the smoothness of a road compare to the freedom of a free-born American? And what does a broken zig-zag mean, compared to knowing that the men we've sent to Congress speak nicely and straight, just as we want them to?”
“It is from a sense of duty, then, that you all go to the liquor store to read the papers?”
“It’s out of a sense of duty that you all go to the liquor store to read the papers?”
“To be sure it is, and he’d be no true born American as didn’t. I don’t say that the father of a family should always be after liquor, but I do say that I’d rather have my son drunk three times in a week, than not look after the affairs of his country.”
“To be sure it is, and he wouldn’t be a true-born American if he didn’t. I’m not saying that a family man should always be chasing after drinks, but I do say I’d rather have my son drunk three times a week than not care about the issues in his country.”
Our autumn walks were delightful; the sun ceased to scorch; the want of flowers was no longer peculiar to Ohio; and the trees took a colouring, which in richness, brilliance, and variety, exceeded all description. I think it is the maple, or sugar- tree, that first sprinkles the forest with rich crimson; the beech follows, with all its harmony of golden tints, from pale yellow up to brightest orange. The dog-wood gives almost the purple colour of the mulberry; the chesnut softens all with its frequent mass of delicate brown, and the sturdy oak carries its deep green into the very lap of winter. These tints are too bright for the landscape painter; the attempt to follow nature in an American autumn scene must be abortive. The colours are in reality extremely brilliant, but the medium through which they are seen increases the effect surprisingly. Of all the points in which America has the advantage of England, the one I felt most sensibly was the clearness and brightness of the atmosphere. By day and by night this exquisite purity of air gives tenfold beauty to every object. I could hardly believe the stars were the same; the Great Bear looked like a constellation of suns; and Jupiter justified all the fine things said of him in those beautiful lines from I know not what spirited pen, beginning,
Our autumn walks were amazing; the sun stopped being harsh; the lack of flowers was no longer unique to Ohio; and the trees took on colors so rich, bright, and diverse that they were hard to describe. I think it's the maple, or sugar tree, that first sprinkles the forest with rich crimson; the beech follows with its harmonious golden hues, ranging from pale yellow to bright orange. The dogwood produces a purple shade almost like that of the mulberry; the chestnut softens it all with its frequent delicate brown clusters, and the strong oak keeps its deep green even into the heart of winter. These colors are too vivid for a landscape painter; trying to capture an American autumn scene would be futile. The colors are actually very bright, but the medium through which they are viewed enhances the effect dramatically. Of all the ways in which America surpasses England, the one I felt most was the clarity and brightness of the atmosphere. Both day and night, this exquisite purity of air adds tenfold beauty to everything. I could hardly believe the stars were the same; the Great Bear looked like a cluster of suns; and Jupiter lived up to all the praise he’s received in those lovely lines from I don’t remember which inspired author, starting,
“I looked on thee, Jove! till my gaze
Shrunk, smote by the pow’r of thy blaze.”
“I looked at you, Jove! until my gaze
Shrank, struck by the power of your brightness.”
I always remarked that the first silver line of the moon’s crescent attracted the eye on the first day, in America, as strongly as it does here on the third. I observed another phenomenon in the crescent moon of that region, the cause of which I less understood. That appearance which Shakespear describes as “the new moon, with the old moon in her lap,” and which I have heard ingeniously explained as the effect of earth light, was less visible there than here.
I always noticed that the first thin sliver of the moon's crescent caught the eye on the first day in America just as strongly as it does here on the third. I observed another phenomenon with the crescent moon in that area, the reason for which I understood less. That appearance which Shakespeare describes as “the new moon, with the old moon in her lap,” and which I've heard cleverly explained as the effect of earth light, was less noticeable there than here.
Cuyp’s clearest landscapes have an atmosphere that approaches nearer to that of America than any I remember on canvas; but even Cuyp’s air cannot reach the lungs, and, therefore, can only give an idea of half the enjoyment; for it makes itself felt as well as seen, and is indeed a constant source of pleasure.
Cuyp’s clearest landscapes have an atmosphere that feels closer to America than any I've seen on canvas; but even Cuyp’s air can’t be inhaled, so it only provides a sense of half the enjoyment; because it can be felt as well as seen, and is truly a continuous source of pleasure.
Our walks were, however, curtailed in several directions by my old Cincinnati enemies, the pigs; immense droves of them were continually arriving from the country by the road that led to most of our favourite walks; they were often fed and lodged in the prettiest valleys,and worse still, were slaughtered beside the prettiest streams. Another evil threatened us from the same quarter, that was yet heavier. Our cottage had an ample piazza, (a luxury almost universal in the country houses of America), which, shaded by a group of acacias, made a delightful sitting- room; from this favourite spot we one day perceived symptoms of building in a field close to it; with much anxiety we hastened to the spot, and asked what building was to be erected there.
Our walks were, however, restricted in several directions by my old enemies from Cincinnati, the pigs; huge herds of them were constantly arriving from the countryside along the road that led to most of our favorite walks; they were often fed and housed in the prettiest valleys, and even worse, were slaughtered next to the most beautiful streams. Another major issue threatened us from the same area. Our cottage had a spacious porch (a luxury almost universal in American country homes), which, shaded by a group of acacia trees, created a lovely sitting area; from this favorite spot, we one day noticed signs of construction in a nearby field. Feeling quite anxious, we rushed over to see what was being built there.
“’Tis to be a slaughter house for hogs,” was the dreadful reply. As there were several gentlemen’s houses in the neighbourhood, I asked if such an erection might not be indicted as a nuisance.
“It's going to be a slaughterhouse for pigs,” was the terrible reply. Since there were several gentlemen’s houses nearby, I asked if such a building could be classified as a nuisance.
“A what?”
“A what now?”
“A nuisance,” I repeated, and explained what I meant.
“A nuisance,” I said again, and I clarified what I meant.
“No, no,” was the reply, “that may do very well for your tyrannical country, where a rich man’s nose is more thought of than a poor man’s mouth; but hogs be profitable produce here, and we be too free for such a law as that, I guess.”
“No, no,” was the reply, “that might work in your oppressive country, where a rich man's status is more valued than a poor man's needs; but pigs are a valuable resource here, and we’re too independent for a law like that, I think.”
During my residence in America, little circumstances like the foregoing often recalled to my mind a conversation I once held in France with an old gentleman on the subject of their active police, and its omnipresent gens d’armerie; “Croyez moi, Madame, il n’y a que ceux, à qui ils ont à faire, qui les trouvent de trop.” And the old gentleman was right, not only in speaking of France, but of the whole human family, as philosophers call us. The well disposed, those whose own feeling of justice would prevent their annoying others, will never complain of the restraints of the law. All the freedom enjoyed in America, beyond what is enjoyed in England, is enjoyed solely by the disorderly at the expense of the orderly; and were I a stout knight, either of the sword or of the pen, I would fearlessly throw down my gauntlet, and challenge the whole Republic to prove the contrary; but being, as I am, a feeble looker on, with a needle for my spear, and “I talk” for my device, I must be contented with the power of stating the fact, perfectly certain that I shall be contradicted by one loud shout from Maine to Georgia.
During my time in America, little things like the ones mentioned above often reminded me of a conversation I had in France with an elderly man about their active police and its ever-present gendarmes. “Believe me, madam, only those who have issues with them find them overly intrusive.” And the old man was right, not just about France but about all of humanity, as philosophers refer to us. Those who are well-intentioned, who have their own sense of justice that keeps them from bothering others, will never complain about the limits of the law. All the freedom found in America, more than in England, is enjoyed only by the chaotic at the expense of the orderly; and if I were a brave knight, whether with a sword or a pen, I would boldly throw down my challenge to the entire Republic to prove otherwise; but since I am just a weak bystander, armed only with a needle for my weapon and “I talk” as my motto, I must settle for the ability to state the truth, fully aware that I will be met with a loud chorus of disagreement from Maine to Georgia.
CHAPTER XI
Religion
Faith
I had often heard it observed before I visited America, that one of the great blessings of its constitution was the absence of a national religion, the country being thus exonerated from all obligation of supporting the clergy; those only contributing to do so whose principles led them to it. My residence in the country has shewn me that a religious tyranny may be exerted very effectually without the aid of the government, in a way much more oppressive than the paying of tithe, and without obtaining any of the salutary decorum, which I presume no one will deny is the result of an established mode of worship.
I had often heard before visiting America that one of the great advantages of its constitution was the lack of a national religion, which meant the country wasn’t obligated to support the clergy; only those whose beliefs drove them to do so would contribute. Living in the country has shown me that a religious tyranny can be imposed very effectively without government involvement, in a way that is much more oppressive than paying tithes, and without the beneficial decorum that I assume no one would deny comes from having an established way of worship.
As it was impossible to remain many weeks in the country without being struck with the strange anomalies produced by its religious system, my early notes contain many observations on the subject; but as nearly the same scenes recurred in every part of the country, I state them here, not as belonging to the west alone, but to the whole Union, the same cause producing the same effect every where.
As it was impossible to stay in the country for several weeks without noticing the unusual quirks created by its religious system, my early notes include numerous observations on the topic; however, since almost the same scenes happened throughout the country, I present them here, not just as pertaining to the west, but to the entire Union, where the same cause produces the same effect everywhere.
The whole people appear to be divided into an almost endless variety of religious factions, and I was told, that to be well received in society, it was necessary to declare yourself as belonging to some one of these. Let your acknowledged belief be what it may, you are said to be not a Christian, unless you attach yourself to a particular congregation. Besides the broad and well-known distinctions of Episcopalian, Catholic, Presbyterian, Calvinist, Baptist, Quaker, Sweden-borgian, Universalist, Dunker, &c. &c. &c.; there are innumerable others springing out of these, each of which assumes a church government of its own; of this, the most intriguing and factious individual is invariably the head; and in order, as it should seem, to shew a reason for this separation, each congregation invests itself with some queer variety of external observance that has the melancholy effect of exposing all religious ceremonies to contempt.
The entire population seems to be split into an almost endless number of religious groups, and I was told that to fit in socially, you need to declare allegiance to one of them. No matter what your personal beliefs are, you’re considered not a Christian unless you join a specific congregation. Beyond the well-known categories like Episcopalian, Catholic, Presbyterian, Calvinist, Baptist, Quaker, Swedenborgian, Universalist, Dunker, etc., there are countless others branching out from these, each with its own church governance; the most intriguing and contentious figure is usually the leader. To justify this separation, each group adopts some odd set of external practices that sadly tend to make all religious ceremonies seem ridiculous.
It is impossible, in witnessing all these unseemly vagaries, not to recognise the advantages of an established church as a sort of headquarters for quiet unpresuming Christians, who are contented to serve faithfully, without insisting upon having each a little separate banner, embroidered with a device of their own imagining.
It’s hard to see all these uncomfortable changes and not appreciate the benefits of an established church as a main hub for humble Christians, who are happy to serve faithfully without needing their own little separate banner, decorated with a design of their own making.
The Catholics alone appear exempt from the fury of division and sub-division that has seized every other persuasion. Having the Pope for their common head, regulates, I presume, their movements, and prevents the outrageous display of individual whim which every other sect is permitted.
The Catholics seem to be the only ones not affected by the chaos of division that has taken hold of every other group. With the Pope as their leader, I think their actions are more organized and keep the extreme expressions of personal preference that other sects allow in check.
I had the pleasure of being introduced to the Catholic bishop of Cincinnati, and have never known in any country a priest of a character and bearing more truly apostolic. He was an American, but I should never have discovered it from his pronunciation or manner. He received his education partly in England, and partly in France. His manners were highly polished; his piety active and sincere, and infinitely more mild and tolerant than that of the factious Sectarians who form the great majority of the American priesthood.
I had the pleasure of meeting the Catholic bishop of Cincinnati, and I've never encountered a priest anywhere who embodied such an authentic apostolic character. He was American, but you would never guess it from his accent or demeanor. He was educated partly in England and partly in France. His manners were very refined; his faith was active and genuine, and he was far more gentle and accepting than the contentious sectarians who make up the majority of American priests.
I believe I am sufficiently tolerant; but this does not prevent my seeing that the object of all religious observances is better obtained, when the government of the church is confided to the wisdom and experience of the most venerated among the people, than when it is placed in the hands of every tinker and tailor who chooses to claim a share in it. Nor is this the only evil attending the want of a national religion, supported by the State. As there is no legal and fixed provision for the clergy, it is hardly surprising that their services are confined to those who can pay them. The vehement expressions of insane or hypocritical zeal, such as were exhibited during “the Revival,” can but ill atone for the want of village worship, any more than the eternal talk of the admirable and unequalled government, can atone for the continual contempt of social order. Church and State hobble along, side by side, notwithstanding their boasted independence. Almost every man you meet will tell you, that he is occupied in labours most abundant for the good of his country; and almost every woman will tell you, that besides those things that are within (her house) she has coming upon her daily the care of all the churches. Yet spite of this universal attention to the government, its laws are half asleep; and spite of the old women and their Dorcas societies, atheism is awake and thriving.
I think I'm pretty open-minded, but that doesn’t stop me from noticing that the goal of all religious practices is better achieved when the leadership of the church is entrusted to the wisdom and experience of the most respected people in the community, rather than being handed over to anyone who wants to get involved. That’s not the only drawback of not having a state-supported national religion. Since there’s no legal and stable funding for the clergy, it’s hardly surprising that their services only reach those who can afford them. The loud displays of misguided or fake enthusiasm, like those seen during “the Revival,” don’t compensate for the lack of local worship, just as endless talk about our amazing and unmatched government doesn’t make up for the persistent disregard for social order. Church and State limp along together, despite their claimed independence. Almost every man you meet will say he’s working hard for the good of his country; and nearly every woman will claim that, aside from managing her home, she’s also taking care of all the churches. Yet, despite this widespread focus on governance, its laws are barely functioning; and despite the old women and their Dorcas societies, atheism is awake and flourishing.
In the smaller cities and towns prayer-meetings take the place of almost all other amusements; but as the thinly scattered population of most villages can give no parties, and pay no priests, they contrive to marry, christen, and bury without them. A stranger taking up his residence in any city in America must think the natives the most religious people upon earth; but if chance lead him among her western villages, he will rarely find either churches or chapels, prayer or preacher; except, indeed, at that most terrific saturnalia, “a camp-meeting.” I was much struck with the answer of a poor woman, whom I saw ironing on a Sunday. “Do you make no difference in your occupations on a Sunday?” I said. “I beant a Christian, Ma’am; we have got no opportunity,” was the reply. It occurred to me, that in a country where “all men are equal,” the government would be guilty of no great crime, did it so far interfere as to give them all an opportunity of becoming Christians if they wished it. But should the federal government dare to propose building a church, and endowing it, in some village that has never heard “the bringing home of bell and burial,” it is perfectly certain that not only the sovereign state where such an abomination was proposed, would rush into the Congress to resent the odious interference, but that all the other states would join the clamour, and such an intermeddling administration would run great risk of impeachment and degradation.
In smaller cities and towns, prayer meetings replace almost all other forms of entertainment. However, since the scattered population of most villages cannot hold parties or pay for clergy, they manage to marry, baptize, and bury without them. A stranger moving to any city in America might think the locals are the most religious people on earth; but if chance leads him to the western villages, he will rarely find churches or chapels, prayers or preachers, except at that wild event, “a camp meeting.” I was struck by the response of a poor woman I saw ironing on a Sunday. “Do you not change your activities on Sundays?” I asked. “I ain't a Christian, Ma’am; we have no opportunity,” she replied. It struck me that in a country where “all men are equal,” the government wouldn't be doing anything wrong by ensuring that everyone has an opportunity to become Christians if they want to. But if the federal government dared to propose building and funding a church in some village that has never even heard the sound of bells or funerals, it’s certain that not only would the state where this outrage was suggested rush to Congress to protest the interference, but all the other states would join in the outcry, and such meddling administration would risk impeachment and disgrace.
Where there is a church-government so constituted as to deserve human respect, I believe it will always be found to receive it, even from those who may not assent to the dogma of its creed; and where such respect exists, it produces a decorum in manners and language often found wanting where it does not. Sectarians will not venture to rhapsodise, nor infidels to scoff, in the common intercourse of society. Both are injurious to the cause of rational religion, and to check both must be advantageous.
Where there is a church government that earns human respect, I believe it will always be respected, even by those who don’t agree with its beliefs; and where that respect exists, it creates a decorum in both behavior and language that is often lacking where it doesn’t. People with extreme views won’t feel free to rave, nor will skeptics scoff, in everyday social interactions. Both behaviors are harmful to the cause of rational religion, and preventing both would be beneficial.
It is certainly possible that some of the fanciful variations upon the ancient creeds of the Christian Church, with which transatlantic religionists amuse themselves, might inspire morbid imaginations in Europe as well as in America; but before they can disturb the solemn harmony HERE they must prelude by a defiance, not only to common sense, but what is infinitely more appalling, to common usage. They must at once rank themselves with the low and the illiterate, for only such prefer the eloquence of the tub to that of the pulpit. The aristocracy must ever, as a body, belong to the established Church, and it is but a small proportion of the influential classes who would be willing to allow that they do not belong to the aristocracy. That such feelings influence the professions of men it were ignorance or hypocrisy to deny; and that nation is wise who knows how to turn even such feelings into a wholesome stream of popular influence.
It’s definitely possible that some of the fanciful twists on the ancient beliefs of the Christian Church, which religious folks across the ocean find entertaining, could spark dark imaginations in Europe just as they do in America. However, before they can disrupt the serious harmony HERE, they must start by rejecting not only common sense but, even more shockingly, common practice. They have to willingly align themselves with the uneducated and the ignorant, as only they would choose the speech from a soapbox over that from a pulpit. The upper class will always, as a group, belong to the established Church, and only a small number of influential people would dare to say they aren’t part of the elite. It would be foolish or dishonest to deny that such feelings affect people’s professions; a wise nation knows how to channel even these sentiments into a positive force for popular influence.
As a specimen of the tone in which religion is mixed in the ordinary intercourse of society, I will transcribe the notes I took of a conversation, at which I was present, at Cincinnati; I wrote them immediately after the conversation took place.
As an example of how religion blends into everyday conversations, I’ll share the notes I took during a discussion I witnessed in Cincinnati; I wrote them down right after the conversation happened.
Dr. A.
Dr. A.
“I wish, Mrs. M., that you would explain to me what a revival is. I hear it talked of all over the city, and I know it means something about Jesus Christ and religion; but that is all I know, will you instruct me farther?”
"I wish, Mrs. M., that you would explain to me what a revival is. I hear people talking about it all over the city, and I know it relates to Jesus Christ and religion; but that’s all I know. Can you tell me more?"
Mrs. M.
Mrs. M.
“I expect, Dr. A., that you want to laugh at me. But that makes no difference. I am firm in my principles, and I fear no one’s laughter.”
“I expect, Dr. A., that you want to laugh at me. But that doesn’t matter. I stand strong in my beliefs, and I’m not afraid of anyone’s laughter.”
Dr. A.
Dr. A.
“Well, but what is a revival?”
“Well, what exactly is a revival?”
Mrs. M.
Ms. M.
“It is difficult, very difficult, to make those see who have no light; to make those understand whose souls are darkened. A revival means just an elegant kindling of the spirit; it is brought about to the Lord’s people by the hands of his saints, and it means salvation in the highest.”
“It is really hard, very hard, to make those see who have no light; to make those understand whose souls are darkened. A revival is just a graceful sparking of the spirit; it is brought about for the Lord’s people by the hands of his saints, and it means salvation at its best.”
Dr. A.
Dr. A.
“But what is it the people mean by talking of feeling the revival? and waiting in spirit for the revival? and the extacy of the revival?”
“But what do people mean when they talk about feeling the revival? And waiting in spirit for the revival? And the excitement of the revival?”
Mrs. M.
Mrs. M.
“Oh Doctor! I am afraid that you are too far gone astray to understand all that. It is a glorious assurance, a whispering of the everlasting covenant, it is the bleating of the lamb, it is the welcome of the shepherd, it is the essence of love, it is the fullness of glory, it is being in Jesus, it is Jesus being in us, it is taking the Holy Ghost into our bosoms, it is sitting ourselves down by God, it is being called to the high places, it is eating, and drinking, and sleeping in the Lord, it is becoming a lion in the faith, it is being lowly and meek, and kissing the hand that smites, it is being mighty and powerful, and scorning reproof, it is—”
“Oh Doctor! I’m afraid you’re too far gone to understand all of this. It’s a glorious assurance, a whisper of the everlasting promise, it’s the lamb calling out, it’s the shepherd’s welcome, it’s the essence of love, it’s the fullness of glory, it’s being in Jesus, it’s Jesus being in us, it’s taking the Holy Spirit into our hearts, it’s sitting down with God, it’s being called to the higher places, it’s eating, drinking, and resting in the Lord, it’s becoming a lion in faith, it’s being humble and gentle, and accepting the hand that strikes, it’s being strong and powerful, and disregarding criticism, it is—”
Dr. A.
Dr. A.
“Thank you, Mrs. M., I feel quite satisfied; and I think I understand a revival now almost as well as you do yourself.”
“Thank you, Mrs. M., I feel really satisfied; and I think I understand a revival now nearly as well as you do.”
Mrs. A.
Mrs. A.
“My! Where can you have learnt all that stuff, Mrs. M.?”
“My! Where did you learn all that stuff, Mrs. M.?”
Mrs. M.
Mrs. M.
“How benighted you are! From the holy book, from the Word of the Lord, from the Holy Ghost, and Jesus Christ themselves.”
“How lost you are! From the holy book, from the Word of the Lord, from the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ Himself.”
Mrs. A.
Ms. A.
“It does seem so droll to me, to hear you talk of “the Word of the Lord.” Why, I have been brought up to look upon the Bible as nothing better than an old newspaper.”
“It sounds so funny to me to hear you talk about ‘the Word of the Lord.’ I was raised to see the Bible as just an old newspaper.”
Mrs. O.
Mrs. O.
“Surely you only say this for the sake of hearing what Mrs. M. will say in return—you do not mean it?”
“Surely you're just saying this to hear what Mrs. M. will respond—you don't really mean it?”
Mrs. A.
Mrs. A.
“La, yes! to be sure I do.”
“La, yes! to be sure I do.”
Dr. A.
Dr. A.
“I profess that I by no means wish my wife to read all she might find there.—What says the Colonel, Mrs. M.?”
“I definitely don't want my wife to read everything she might find there.—What does the Colonel say, Mrs. M.?”
Mrs. M.
Mrs. M.
“As to that, I never stop to ask him. I tell him every day that I believe in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and that it is his duty to believe in them too, and then my conscience is clear, and I don’t care what he believes. Really, I have no notion of one’s husband interfering in such matters.”
“As for that, I never bother to ask him. I tell him every day that I believe in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and that it’s his responsibility to believe in them too, and then my conscience is clear, so I don’t care what he believes. Honestly, I have no idea why a husband would get involved in such matters.”
Dr. A.
Dr. A.
“You are quite right. I am sure I give my wife leave to believe just what she likes; but she is a good woman, and does not abuse the liberty; for she believes nothing.”
“You’re absolutely right. I definitely let my wife think whatever she wants; but she’s a good woman and doesn’t take advantage of that freedom because she doesn’t believe in anything.”
It was not once, nor twice, nor thrice, but many many times, during my residence in America, that I was present when subjects which custom as well as principle had taught me to consider as fitter for the closet than the tea-table, were thus lightly discussed. I hardly know whether I was more startled at first hearing, in little dainty namby pamby tones, a profession of Atheism over a teacup, or at having my attention called from a Johnny cake, to a rhapsody on election and the second birth.
It wasn't just once, or twice, or even three times, but so many times during my time in America that I found myself in situations where topics that custom and principle had led me to think were more suitable for private discussions than the dinner table were casually talked about. I can hardly say whether I was more shocked hearing about Atheism in soft, delicate tones over tea or being pulled away from a Johnny cake to listen to a passionate discussion about elections and being "born again."
But, notwithstanding this revolting license, persecution exists to a degree unknown, I believe, in our well-ordered land since the days of Cromwell. I had the following anecdote from a gentleman perfectly well acquainted with the circumstances. A tailor sold a suit of clothes to a sailor a few moments before he sailed, which was on a Sunday morning. The corporation of New York prosecuted the tailor, and he was convicted, and sentenced to a fine greatly beyond his means to pay. Mr. F., a lawyer of New York, defended him with much eloquence, but in vain. His powerful speech, however, was not without effect, for it raised him such a host of Presbyterian enemies as sufficed to destroy his practice. Nor was this all: his nephew was at the time preparing for the bar, and soon after the above circumstance occurred his certificates were presented, and refused, with this declaration, “that no man of the name and family of F. should be admitted.” I have met this young man in society; he is a person of very considerable talent, and being thus cruelly robbed of his profession, has become the editor of a newspaper.
But despite this shocking freedom, persecution exists to a level that I believe has not been seen in our well-organized country since the days of Cromwell. I heard the following story from a gentleman who is very familiar with the details. A tailor sold a suit of clothes to a sailor just moments before he set sail on a Sunday morning. The city of New York prosecuted the tailor, and he was convicted and sentenced to a fine far beyond his ability to pay. Mr. F., a lawyer from New York, defended him eloquently, but it was all for nothing. However, his powerful speech did have an effect, as it garnered him a large number of Presbyterian enemies, which was enough to ruin his practice. That wasn't all: his nephew was preparing to enter the bar at the time, and shortly after this incident occurred, his certificates were submitted and rejected with the statement, “that no man of the name and family of F. should be admitted.” I’ve encountered this young man in social settings; he is quite talented, and being unfairly denied his profession, he has become the editor of a newspaper.
CHAPTER XII
Peasantry, compared to that of England—Early marriages—Charity—Independence and equality—Cottage prayer-meeting
Peasantry, compared to that of England—Early marriages—Charity—Independence and equality—Cottage prayer meeting
Mohawk, as our little village was called, gave us an excellent opportunity of comparing the peasants of the United States with those of England, and of judging the average degree of comfort enjoyed by each. I believe Ohio gives as fair a specimen as any part of the union; if they have the roughness and inconveniences of a new state to contend with, they have higher wages and cheaper provisions; if I err in supposing it a mean state in point of comfort, it certainly is not in taking too low a standard.
Mohawk, as our little village was called, gave us a great chance to compare the farmers of the United States with those of England and to assess the typical level of comfort experienced by each. I think Ohio represents as good an example as any part of the country; although they face the roughness and challenges of a new state, they enjoy higher wages and lower living costs. If I'm wrong in thinking it’s a modest state in terms of comfort, it definitely isn't by setting too low a standard.
Mechanics, if good workmen, are certain of employment, and good wages, rather higher than with us; the average wages of a labourer throughout the Union is ten dollars a month, with lodging, boarding, washing, and mending; if he lives at his own expense he has a dollar a day. It appears to me that the necessaries of life, that is to say, meat, bread, butter, tea, and coffee, (not to mention whiskey), are within the reach of every sober, industrious, and healthy man who chooses to have them; and yet I think that an English peasant, with the same qualifications, would, in coming to the United States, change for the worse. He would find wages somewhat higher, and provisions in Western America considerably lower: but this statement, true as it is, can lead to nothing but delusion if taken apart from other facts, fully as certain, and not less important, but which require more detail in describing, and which perhaps cannot be fully comprehended, except by an eye-witness. The American poor are accustomed to eat meat three times a day; I never enquired into the habits of any cottagers in Western America, where this was not the case. I found afterwards in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and other parts of the country, where the price of meat was higher, that it was used with more economy; yet still a much larger portion of the weekly income is thus expended than with us. Ardent spirits, though lamentably cheap,[3] still cost something, and the use of them among the men, with more or less of discretion, according to the character, is universal. Tobacco also grows at their doors, and is not taxed; yet this too costs something, and the air of heaven is not in more general use among the men of America, than chewing tobacco. I am not now pointing out the evils of dram-drinking, but it is evident, that where this practice prevails universally, and often to the most frightful excess, the consequence must be, that the money spent to obtain the dram is less than the money lost by the time consumed in drinking it. Long, disabling, and expensive fits of sickness are incontestably more frequent in every part of America, than in England, and the sufferers have no aid to look to, but what they have saved, or what they may be enabled to sell. I have never seen misery exceed what I have witnessed in an American cottage where disease has entered.
Mechanics, if they are skilled workers, can expect job security and generally higher wages than we do. The average wage for a laborer across the country is ten dollars a month, which includes housing, food, laundry, and repairs; if they cover their own expenses, it comes to about a dollar a day. It seems to me that the basics of life, such as meat, bread, butter, tea, and coffee (not to mention whiskey), are accessible to any sober, hardworking, and healthy person who wants them. However, I believe that an English peasant with similar qualifications would actually find their situation worse after moving to the United States. They would notice slightly higher wages and considerably lower food prices in Western America; yet, while this is true, it can create a misunderstanding if considered without additional equally important facts that require more elaboration and are perhaps better understood by someone who has seen it firsthand. The poor in America typically eat meat three times a day; I never asked about the eating habits of any workers in Western America where this wasn't the case. Later, I discovered in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and other regions with higher meat prices that it was consumed more sparingly, but still a larger part of the weekly income goes toward it compared to us. Alcohol, though regrettably cheap, still costs something, and its consumption among men varies with their personal judgment but is widespread. Tobacco also grows nearby and isn’t taxed; still, it costs something, and chewing tobacco is nearly as common among American men as breathing. I’m not aiming to highlight the problems of drinking alcohol, but it’s clear that when this habit is so prevalent and often taken to extreme levels, the money used for alcohol ends up being less than what is lost in productivity due to the time spent drinking. Lengthy, debilitating, and costly illnesses occur far more frequently across America than in England, and those who suffer have no support except what they’ve saved or what they can sell. I have never witnessed such despair as what I saw in an American cottage afflicted by illness.
[3] About a shilling a gallon is the retail price of good whiskey. If bought wholesale, or of inferior quality, it is much cheaper.
[3] Good whiskey sells for about a shilling a gallon at retail. If you buy it wholesale or get a lower quality, it’s a lot cheaper.
But if the condition of the labourer be not superior to that of the English peasant, that of his wife and daughters is incomparably worse. It is they who are indeed the slaves of the soil. One has but to look at the wife of an American cottager, and ask her age, to be convinced that the life she leads is one of hardship, privation, and labour. It is rare to see a woman in this station who has reached the age of thirty, without losing every trace of youth and beauty. You continually see women with infants on their knee, that you feel sure are their grand- children, till some convincing proof of the contrary is displayed. Even the young girls, though often with lovely features, look pale, thin, and haggard. I do not remember to have seen in any single instance among the poor, a specimen of the plump, rosy, laughing physiognomy so common among our cottage girls. The horror of domestic service, which the reality of slavery, and the fable of equality, have generated, excludes the young women from that sure and most comfortable resource of decent English girls; and the consequence is, that with a most irreverend freedom of manner to the parents, the daughters are, to the full extent of the word, domestic slaves. This condition, which no periodical merry-making, no village FÊTE, ever occurs to cheer, is only changed for the still sadder burdens of a teeming wife. They marry very young; in fact, in no rank of life do you meet with young women in that delightful period of existence between childhood and marriage, wherein, if only tolerably well spent, so much useful information is gained, and the character takes a sufficient degree of firmness to support with dignity the more important parts of wife and mother. The slender, childish thing, without vigour of mind or body, is made to stem a sea of troubles that dims her young eye and makes her cheek grow pale, even before nature has given it the last beautiful finish of the full-grown woman.
But if the situation of the laborer isn’t better than that of the English peasant, the situation of his wife and daughters is much worse. They are truly the slaves of the land. Just look at the wife of an American farmer and ask her age; you’ll quickly see that her life is filled with hardship, lack, and hard work. It’s rare to find a woman in this position who has reached thirty without showing every sign of losing her youth and beauty. You often see women with babies on their laps, and you might think they are their grandchildren until you get some proof otherwise. Even young girls, though they might have lovely features, look pale, thin, and worn out. I can’t recall seeing a single instance among the poor of a cheerful, rosy-faced girl like those we have among our cottage girls. The dread of domestic service, fueled by the reality of slavery and the myth of equality, keeps young women away from the reliable and comfortable path of respectable English girls. As a result, with a complete lack of respect toward their parents, the daughters become, in every sense, domestic slaves. This condition, which no festive occasion or village celebration ever lifts, only shifts to the even heavier burdens of being an overloaded wife. They marry very young; in fact, in no social class do you find young women enjoying that lovely time of life between childhood and marriage, during which, if spent well, they can gain so much useful knowledge and develop a strong enough character to handle the important roles of wife and mother with dignity. The slender, childlike girl, lacking strength of mind or body, is forced to face a sea of troubles that dims her youthful eyes and makes her cheeks pale, even before nature has given her the final beautiful touch of a full-grown woman.
“We shall get along,” is the answer in full, for all that can be said in way of advice to a boy and girl who take it into their heads to go before a magistrate and “get married.” And they do get along, till sickness overtakes them, by means perhaps of borrowing a kettle from one and a tea-pot from another; but intemperance, idleness, or sickness will, in one week, plunge those who are even getting along well, into utter destitution; and where this happens, they are completely without resource.
“We’ll manage,” is the complete answer, covering everything that can be said as advice to a boy and girl who decide to go to a magistrate and “get married.” And they do manage, until sickness hits them, maybe by borrowing a kettle from one person and a tea pot from another; but issues like drinking too much, laziness, or illness can, in just a week, plunge even those who are doing okay into total poverty; and when this happens, they have no options left.
The absence of poor-laws is, without doubt, a blessing to the country, but they have not that natural and reasonable dependence on the richer classes which, in countries differently constituted, may so well supply their place. I suppose there is less alms-giving in America than in any other Christian country on the face of the globe. It is not in the temper of the people either to give or to receive.
The lack of poor laws is definitely a blessing for the country, but they don't have that natural and reasonable reliance on the wealthier classes, which, in different countries, could effectively take their place. I guess there’s less charitable giving in America than in any other Christian country in the world. The people’s mindset isn’t geared towards giving or receiving.
I extract the following pompous passage from a Washington paper of Feb. 1829, (a season of uncommon severity and distress,) which, I think, justifies my observation.
I pull out this pretentious excerpt from a Washington newspaper dated February 1829, (a time of extreme hardship and struggle,) which, I believe, supports my point.
“Among the liberal evidences of sympathy for the suffering poor of this city, two have come to our knowledge which deserve to be especially noticed: the one a donation by the President of the United States to the committee of the ward in which he resides of fifty dollars; the other the donation by a few of the officers of the war department to the Howard and Dorcas Societies, of seventy-two dollars.” When such mention is made of a gift of about nine pounds sterling from the sovereign magistrate of the United States, and of thirteen pounds sterling as a contribution from one of the state departments, the inference is pretty obvious, that the sufferings of the destitute in America are not liberally relieved by individual charity.
“Among the generous signs of compassion for the suffering poor in this city, two have come to our attention that deserve special mention: one is a donation of fifty dollars from the President of the United States to the committee in his ward; the other is a contribution of seventy-two dollars from several officers of the war department to the Howard and Dorcas Societies.” When such a gift of about nine pounds sterling is noted from the chief magistrate of the United States, and a contribution of thirteen pounds sterling from one of the state departments, it’s clear that the needs of the destitute in America aren’t adequately met by individual charity.
I had not been three days at Mohawk-cottage before a pair of ragged children came to ask for medicine for a sick mother; and when it was given to them, the eldest produced a handful of cents, and desired to know what he was to pay. The superfluous milk of our cow was sought after eagerly, but every new comer always proposed to pay for it. When they found out that “the English old woman” did not sell anything, I am persuaded they by no means liked her the better for it; but they seemed to think, that if she were a fool it was no reason they should be so too, and accordingly the borrowing, as they called it, became very constant, but always in a form that shewed their dignity and freedom. One woman sent to borrow a pound of cheese; another half a pound of coffee; and more than once an intimation accompanied the milk-jug, that the milk must be fresh, and unskimmed: on one occasion the messenger refused milk, and said, “Mother only wanted a little cream for her coffee.”
I hadn't been at Mohawk Cottage for more than three days when a couple of ragged kids came to ask for medicine for their sick mom. When I handed it over, the oldest one pulled out a handful of change and asked what he owed me. Everyone was eager for our cow's extra milk, but every newcomer always offered to pay for it. When they found out that "the English old woman" didn't sell anything, I really think they didn't like her any better for it. However, they seemed to believe that just because she was kind of clueless didn't mean they had to be too. So, they started borrowing things, as they called it, but always in a way that showed their pride and independence. One woman sent someone to borrow a pound of cheese; another wanted half a pound of coffee. More than once, a note came with the milk jug stating that the milk had to be fresh and unskimmed. On one occasion, the messenger turned down the milk and said, "Mom only wanted a little cream for her coffee."
I could never teach them to believe, during above a year that I lived at this house, that I would not sell the old clothes of the family; and so pertinacious were they in bargain-making, that often, when I had given them the articles which they wanted to purchase, they would say, “Well, I expect I shall have to do a turn of work for this; you may send for me when you want me.” But as I never did ask for the turn of work, and as this formula was constantly repeated, I began to suspect that it was spoken solely to avoid uttering the most un-American phrase “I thank you.”
I could never convince them, during the year I lived in this house, that I wouldn’t sell the family's old clothes; they were so persistent in making deals that often, when I gave them the items they wanted to buy, they would say, “Well, I guess I’ll have to do some work for this; just call me when you need me.” But since I never asked for the work and this phrase was constantly repeated, I started to think it was just a way to avoid saying the most un-American phrase, “Thank you.”
There was one man whose progress in wealth I watched with much interest and pleasure. When I first became his neighbour, himself, his wife, and four children, were living in one room, with plenty of beef-steaks and onions for breakfast, dinner and supper, but with very few other comforts. He was one of the finest men I ever saw, full of natural intelligence and activity of mind and body, but he could neither read nor write. He drank but little whiskey, and but rarely chewed tobacco, and was therefore more free from that plague spot of spitting which rendered male colloquy so difficult to endure. He worked for us frequently, and often used to walk into the drawing-room and seat himself on the sofa, and tell me all his plans. He made an engagement with the proprietor of the wooded hill before mentioned, by which half the wood he could fell was to be his own. His unwearied industry made this a profitable bargain, and from the proceeds he purchased the materials for building a comfortable frame (or wooden) house; he did the work almost entirely himself. He then got a job for cutting rails, and, as he could cut twice as many in a day as any other man in the neighbourhood, he made a good thing of it. He then let half his pretty house, which was admirably constructed, with an ample portico, that kept it always cool. His next step was contracting for the building a wooden bridge, and when I left Mohawk he had fitted up his half of the building as an hotel and grocery store; and I have no doubt that every sun that sets sees him a richer man than when it rose. He hopes to make his son a lawyer, and I have little doubt that he will live to see him sit in congress; when this time arrives, the wood-cutter’s son will rank with any other member of congress, not of courtesy, but of right, and the idea that his origin is a disadvantage, will never occur to the imagination of the most exalted of his fellow-citizens.
There was one man whose rise in wealth I watched with great interest and enjoyment. When I first became his neighbor, he, his wife, and their four children were living in one room, often having beef steaks and onions for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, but not many other comforts. He was one of the most impressive people I ever met, full of natural intelligence and energy, both mentally and physically, but he couldn't read or write. He drank very little whiskey and rarely chewed tobacco, so he was less affected by the unpleasant habit of spitting that made conversations with men quite unpleasant. He often worked for us and would sometimes walk into the living room, sit on the sofa, and share all his plans with me. He made a deal with the owner of the wooded hill I mentioned earlier, which allowed him to keep half of the wood he could cut down. His tireless work made this a good deal, and from what he earned, he bought the materials to build a comfortable wooden house; he did almost all of the construction himself. He then got a job cutting rails, and since he could cut twice as many in a day as any other man in the neighborhood, he made a nice profit. After that, he rented out half of his lovely house, which was well-built and had a large porch that kept it cool. His next move was to contract for building a wooden bridge, and when I left Mohawk, he had turned his half of the building into a hotel and grocery store. I have no doubt that every sunset sees him richer than he was at sunrise. He hopes to make his son a lawyer, and I have little doubt that he will live to see him sitting in congress; when that time comes, the woodcutter's son will hold the same status as any other member of congress, not as a courtesy but as a right, and the idea that his humble beginnings are a disadvantage will never cross the minds of the most esteemed of his fellow citizens.
This is the only feature in American society that I recognise as indicative of the equality they profess. Any man’s son may become the equal of any other man’s son, and the consciousness of this is certainly a spur to exertion; on the other hand, it is also a spur to that coarse familiarity, untempered by any shadow of respect, which is assumed by the grossest and the lowest in their intercourse with the highest and most refined. This is a positive evil, and, I think, more than balances its advantages.
This is the only aspect of American society that I see as a sign of the equality they claim to uphold. Any man's son can become just as good as any other man's son, and knowing this definitely motivates people to work hard; however, it also encourages a rough kind of familiarity, lacking any hint of respect, which the most vulgar and lowly exhibit in their interactions with the highest and most refined. This is a real downside, and I believe it outweighs the benefits.
And here again it may be observed, that the theory of equality may be very daintily discussed by English gentlemen in a London dining-room, when the servant, having placed a fresh bottle of cool wine on the table, respectfully shuts the door, and leaves them to their walnuts and their wisdom; but it will be found less palatable when it presents itself in the shape of a hard, greasy paw, and is claimed in accents that breathe less of freedom than of onions and whiskey. Strong, indeed, must be the love of equality in an English breast if it can survive a tour through the Union.
And here again it's worth noting that the idea of equality can be elegantly debated by English gentlemen in a London dining room, where the servant respectfully sets down a chilled bottle of wine and closes the door, leaving them to enjoy their walnuts and insightful conversation. However, this idea becomes much less appealing when it shows up as a rough, greasy hand and is demanded in a voice that seems to smell more of onions and whiskey than of freedom. It takes a strong commitment to equality for an English person to maintain that belief after a trip through the Union.
There was one house in the village which was remarkable from its wretchedness. It had an air of indecent poverty about it, which long prevented my attempting an entrance; but at length, upon being told that I could get chicken and eggs there whenever I wanted them, I determined upon venturing. The door being opened to my knock, I very nearly abandoned my almost blunted purpose; I never beheld such a den of filth and misery: a woman, the very image of dirt and disease, held a squalid imp of a baby on her hip bone while she kneaded her dough with her right fist only A great lanky girl, of twelve years old, was sitting on a barrel, gnawing a corn cob; when I made known my business, the woman answered, “No not I; I got no chickens to sell, nor eggs neither; but my son will, plenty I expect. Here Nick,” (bawling at the bottom of a ladder), “here’s an old woman what wants chickens.” Half a moment brought Nick to the bottom of the ladder, and I found my merchant was one of a ragged crew, whom I had been used to observe in my daily walk, playing marbles in the dust, and swearing lustily; he looked about ten years old.
There was one house in the village that stood out because of its terrible condition. It had an aura of extreme poverty that made me hesitant to go inside for a long time; however, after hearing that I could get chicken and eggs there whenever I wanted, I decided to give it a try. When the door opened to my knock, I almost changed my mind; I had never seen a place so filthy and miserable: a woman, looking like a picture of dirt and disease, was holding a dirty little baby on her hip while she kneaded dough with just her right hand. A tall, gangly girl about twelve years old was sitting on a barrel, gnawing on a corn cob. When I stated my purpose, the woman replied, “Not me; I don’t have any chickens to sell, or eggs either; but my son will, probably has plenty. Hey Nick,” (calling down from the top of a ladder), “here’s an old woman who wants chickens.” In just a moment, Nick came down from the ladder, and I realized my seller was one of a ragged group I had often seen in my daily walks, playing marbles in the dirt and cursing loudly; he looked about ten years old.
“Have you chicken to sell, my boy?”
“Do you have any chicken to sell, my boy?”
“Yes, and eggs too, more nor what you’ll buy.”
“Yes, and eggs too, more than what you’ll buy.”
Having enquired price, condition, and so on, I recollected that I had been used to give the same price at market, the feathers plucked, and the chicken prepared for the table, and I told him that he ought not to charge the same.
Having asked about the price, condition, and so on, I remembered that I used to pay the same amount at the market for the chicken, cleaned and ready to cook, and I told him he shouldn't charge the same.
“Oh for that, I expect I can fix ’em as well as ever them was, what you got in market.”
“Oh, I expect I can fix them as well as any of the ones you have in the market.”
“You fix them?”
"Can you fix them?"
“Yes to be sure, why not?”
“Definitely, why not?”
“I thought you were too fond of marbles.”
“I thought you were really into marbles.”
He gave me a keen glance, and said, “You don’t know I.—When will you be wanting the chickens?”
He shot me a sharp look and said, “You don’t know I.—When do you need the chickens?”
He brought them at the time directed, extremely well “fixed,” and I often dealt with him afterwards. When I paid him, he always thrust his hand into his breaches pocket, which I presume, as being the keep, was fortified more strongly than the dilapidated outworks, and drew from thence rather more dollars, half-dollars, levies, and fips, than his dirty little hand could well hold. My curiosity was excited, and though I felt an involuntary disgust towards the young Jew, I repeatedly conversed with him.
He brought them right on time, very well “put together,” and I often dealt with him afterwards. When I paid him, he always thrust his hand into his pants pocket, which I guess, since it was the keep, was reinforced more than the worn-down outer parts, and pulled out way more dollars, half-dollars, coins, and small change than his dirty little hand could hold. I was curious, and even though I felt an involuntary disgust towards the young Jew, I talked to him several times.
“You are very rich, Nick,” I said to him one day, on his making an ostentatious display of change, as he called it; he sneered with a most unchildish expression of countenance, and replied, “I guess ’twould be a bad job for I, if that was all I’d got to shew.”
“You're really wealthy, Nick,” I said to him one day when he was showing off his change, as he called it; he sneered with a surprisingly adult expression and replied, “I guess it would be a pretty bad deal for me if that was all I had to show.”
I asked him how he managed his business. He told me that he bought eggs by the hundred, and lean chicken by the score, from the waggons that passed their door on the way to market; that he fatted the latter in coops he had made himself, and could easily double their price, and that his eggs answered well too, when he sold them out by the dozen.
I asked him how he ran his business. He told me that he bought eggs in bulk and lean chickens in groups of twenty from the carts that passed by on their way to the market. He fattened the chickens in coops he built himself and could easily double their price, and his eggs sold well too when he sold them by the dozen.
“And do you give the money to your mother?”
“And do you give the money to your mom?”
“I expect not,” was the answer, with another sharp glance of his ugly blue eyes.
“I don't expect so,” was the reply, accompanied by another sharp look from his ugly blue eyes.
“What do you do with it. Nick?”
“What do you do with it, Nick?”
His look said plainly, what is that to you? but he only answered, quaintly enough, “I takes care of it.”
His expression clearly conveyed, "What’s it to you?" but he simply responded, somewhat oddly, “I take care of it.”
How Nick got his first dollar is very doubtful; I was told that when he entered the village store, the person serving always called in another pair of eyes; but having obtained it, the spirit, activity, and industry, with which he caused it to increase and multiply, would have been delightful in one of Miss Edgeworth’s dear little clean bright-looking boys, who would have carried all he got to his mother; but in Nick it was detestable. No human feeling seemed to warm his young heart, not even the love of self-indulgence, for he was not only ragged and dirty, but looked considerably more than half starved, and I doubt not his dinners and suppers half fed his fat chickens.
How Nick got his first dollar is really uncertain; I heard that when he walked into the village store, the person behind the counter always called in someone else to keep an eye on things. But once he had it, the energy and determination he showed in making that dollar grow would have been charming in one of Miss Edgeworth’s sweet, tidy little boys, who would have taken all he earned home to his mother; but in Nick, it was repulsive. No human emotion seemed to warm his young heart, not even a desire for self-indulgence, as he was not only ragged and dirty but looked extremely underfed, and I don't doubt that his dinners and suppers barely fed his fat chickens.
I by no means give this history of Nick, the chicken merchant, as an anecdote characteristic in all respects of America; the only part of the story which is so, is the independence of the little man, and is one instance out of a thousand, of the hard, dry, calculating character that is the result of it. Probably Nick will be very rich; perhaps he will be President. I once got so heartily scolded for saying, that I did not think all American citizens were equally eligible to that office, that I shall never again venture to doubt it.
I definitely don’t present this story about Nick, the chicken seller, as a typical American anecdote; the only part that is characteristic is the independence of this little guy, and it’s just one example out of a thousand of the tough, calculating nature that comes with it. Nick will probably be very wealthy; he might even become President. I was once scolded so harshly for suggesting that I didn’t believe all American citizens were equally qualified for that position that I’ll never dare to question it again.
Another of our cottage acquaintance was a market-gardener, from whom we frequently bought vegetables; from the wife of this man we one day received a very civil invitation to “please to come and pass the evening with them in prayer.” The novelty of the circumstance, and its great dissimilarity to the ways and manners of our own country, induced me to accept the invitation, and also to record the visit here.
Another person we knew in the cottage was a market gardener, from whom we often bought vegetables. One day, his wife kindly invited us to “please come and spend the evening with them in prayer.” The uniqueness of the situation and how different it was from our own customs made me want to accept the invitation and also to write about the visit here.
We were received with great attention, and a place was assigned us on one of the benches that surrounded the little parlour. Several persons, looking like mechanics and their wives, were present; every one sat in profound silence, and with that quiet subdued air, that serious people assume on entering a church. At length, a long, black, grim-looking man entered; his dress, the cut of his hair, and his whole appearance, strongly recalled the idea of one of Cromwell’s fanatics. He stepped solemnly into the middle of the room, and took a chair that stood there, but not to sit upon it; he turned the back towards him, on which he placed his hands, and stoutly uttering a sound between a hem and a cough, he deposited freely on either side of him a considerable portion of masticated tobacco. He then began to preach. His text was “Live in hope,” and he continued to expound it for two hours in a drawling, nasal tone, with no other respite than what he allowed himself for expectoration. If I say that he repeated the words of this text a hundred times, I think I shall not exceed the truth, for that allows more than a minute for each repetition, and in fact the whole discourse was made up of it. The various tones in which he uttered it might have served as a lesson on emphasis; as a question—in accents of triumph—in accents of despair—of pity—of threatening—of authority—of doubt—of hope—of faith. Having exhausted every imaginable variety of tone, he abruptly said, “Let us pray,” and twisting his chair round, knelt before it. Every one knelt before the seat they had occupied, and listened for another half hour to a rant of miserable, low, familiar jargon, that he presumed to improvise to his Maker as a prayer. In this, however, the cottage apostle only followed the example set by every preacher throughout the Union, excepting those of the Episcopalian and Catholic congregations; THEY only do not deem themselves privileged to address the Deity in strains of crude and unweighed importunity. These ranters may sometimes be very much in earnest, but surely the least we can say of it is, that they
We were welcomed with great care, and a spot was given to us on one of the benches that surrounded the small parlor. Several people, looking like workers and their partners, were present; everyone sat in complete silence, with that quiet, subdued demeanor that serious people take on when entering a church. Finally, a long, dark, grim-looking man walked in; his clothing, hairstyle, and overall appearance strongly reminded one of Cromwell’s fanatics. He solemnly stepped into the middle of the room and took a chair that was there, but not to actually sit on it; he turned the back towards him, placed his hands on it, and boldly made a sound that was half a hem and half a cough, freely spitting out a substantial amount of chewed tobacco on either side of him. Then he began to preach. His message was “Live in hope,” and he went on to explain it for two hours in a drawn-out, nasal voice, with no breaks except for what he took to spit. If I claim that he repeated the words of this message a hundred times, I doubt that I would be exaggerating, as that would allow more than a minute for each repetition, and in fact, the entire talk was centered around it. The different tones in which he expressed it could have served as a lesson in emphasis; as a question—in tones of triumph—in tones of despair—of pity—of threat—of authority—of doubt—of hope—of faith. Once he had exhausted every possible variation of tone, he abruptly said, “Let us pray,” and turning his chair around, knelt before it. Everyone knelt in front of their seats and listened for another half hour to a rant of miserable, low, familiar language that he dared to improvise as a prayer to his Maker. In this, however, the cottage preacher only followed the example of every preacher throughout the country, except those from the Episcopal and Catholic congregations; THEY are the only ones who do not consider themselves entitled to address the Deity in rough and unfiltered demands. These ranters can sometimes be very serious, but surely the least we can say about it is that they
“Praise their God amiss.”
“Praise their God incorrectly.”
I enquired afterwards of a friend, well acquainted with such matters, how the grim preacher of “Hope” got paid for his labours, and he told me that the trade was an excellent one, for that many a gude wife bestowed more than a tithe of what her gude man trusted to her keeping, in rewarding the zeal of these self- chosen apostles. These sable ministers walk from house to house, or if the distance be considerable, ride on a comfortable ambling nag. They are not only as empty as wind, but resemble it in other particulars; for they blow where they list, and no man knoweth whence they come, nor whither they go. When they see a house that promises comfortable lodging and entertainment, they enter there, and say to the good woman of the house, “Sister, shall I pray with you?” If the answer be favourable, and it is seldom otherwise, he instals himself and his horse till after breakfast the next morning. The best meat, drink, and lodging are his, while he stays, and he seldom departs without some little contribution in money for the support of the crucified and suffering church. Is it not strange that “the most intelligent people in the world” should prefer such a religion as this, to a form established by the wisdom and piety of the ablest and best among the erring sons of men, solemnly sanctioned by the nation’s law, and rendered sacred by the use of their fathers?
I asked a friend who knows about these things how the grim preacher of “Hope” gets paid for his work, and he told me that it’s a pretty good gig, since many a good wife gives more than a tenth of what her husband trusts her with to reward these self-appointed ministers. These dark-clad preachers go from house to house, or if the distance is too far, they ride on a comfortable horse. They are not only as empty as air, but also share some other similarities; they show up wherever they want, and no one knows where they come from or where they’re headed. When they spot a house that looks like it offers good lodging and food, they walk in and ask the lady of the house, “Sister, can I pray with you?” If the answer is usually positive, he makes himself and his horse at home until after breakfast the next morning. He enjoys the best food, drink, and accommodation while he’s there, and he seldom leaves without some small donation of money to support the suffering church. Isn’t it strange that “the most intelligent people in the world” would choose a religion like this over one established by the wisdom and piety of the most capable and virtuous among humanity, officially sanctioned by national law, and made sacred by the practices of their ancestors?
It would be well for all reasoners on the social system to observe steadily, and with an eye obscured by no beam of prejudice, the result of the experiment that is making on the other side of the Atlantic. If I mistake not, they might learn there, better than by any abstract speculation, what are the points on which the magistrates of a great people should dictate to them and on what points they should be left freely to their own guidance, I sincerely believe, that if a fire-worshipper, or an Indian Brahmin, were to come to the United States, prepared to preach and pray in English, he would not be long without a “very respectable congregation.”
It would be wise for anyone thinking about the social system to watch closely, without any bias clouding their judgment, the experiment happening on the other side of the Atlantic. If I’m not mistaken, they could learn more there, through real experience rather than abstract theory, about what issues a government should take charge of and which ones people should manage on their own. I truly believe that if a fire-worshipper or an Indian Brahmin came to the United States ready to preach and pray in English, they wouldn’t have to wait long to find a “very respectable congregation.”
The influence of a religion, sanctioned by the government, could in no country, in the nineteenth century, interfere with the speculations of a philosopher in his closet, but it might, and must, steady the weak and wavering opinions of the multitude. There is something really pitiable in the effect produced by the want of this rudder oar. I knew a family where one was a Methodist, one a Presbyterian, and a third a Baptist; and another, where one was a Quaker, one a declared Atheist, and another an Universalist. These are all females, and all moving in the best society that America affords; but one and all of them as incapable of reasoning on things past, present, and to come, as the infants they nourish, yet one and all of them perfectly fit to move steadily and usefully in a path marked out for them. But I shall be called an itinerant preacher myself if I pursue this theme.
The influence of a state-sanctioned religion couldn't interfere with a philosopher's thoughts in his study during the nineteenth century, but it definitely could—and should—stabilize the uncertain opinions of the general public. It's really sad to see the impact of lacking this guiding principle. I knew a family with one member who was a Methodist, another a Presbyterian, and a third a Baptist; and another family where one was a Quaker, one was an outspoken Atheist, and another a Universalist. These were all women, all part of the best society that America has to offer, but all of them just as incapable of reasoning about the past, present, and future as the infants they care for. Yet, all of them were perfectly capable of moving steadily and effectively along a path laid out for them. But if I keep this up, I might be accused of being a traveling preacher myself.
As I have not the magic power of my admirable friend, Miss Mitford, to give grace and interest to the humblest rustic details, I must not venture to linger among the cottages that surrounded us; but before I quit them I must record the pleasing recollection of one or two neighbours of more companionable rank, from whom I received so much friendly attention, and such unfailing kindness, in all my little domestic embarrassments, that I shall never recall the memory of Mohawk, without paying an affectionate tribute to these far distant friends. I wish it were within the range of hope, that I might see them again, in my own country, and repay, in part, the obligations I owe them.
As I don’t have the magical ability of my wonderful friend, Miss Mitford, to make even the simplest rural details seem interesting, I won't spend too much time among the cottages around us. However, before I leave, I want to remember one or two neighbors of a more relatable status, who offered me so much kindness and support during my small domestic troubles that I will always think of Mohawk with affection for these distant friends. I wish it were possible to hope that I could see them again in my own country and repay, at least in part, the debt I owe them.
CHAPTER XIII
Theatre—Fine Arts—Delicacy—Shaking Quakers—Big-Bone Lick—Visit of the President
Theatre—Fine Arts—Delicacy—Shaking Quakers—Big-Bone Lick—Visit of the President
The theatre at Cincinnati is small, and not very brilliant in decoration, but in the absence of every other amusement our young men frequently attended it, and in the bright clear nights of autumn and winter, the mile and a half of distance was not enough to prevent the less enterprising members of the family from sometimes accompanying them. The great inducement to this was the excellent acting of Mr. and Mrs. Alexander Drake, the managers.[4] Nothing could be more distinct than their line of acting, but the great versatility of their powers enabled them often to appear together. Her cast was the highest walk of tragedy, and his the broadest comedy; but yet, as Goldsmith says of his sister heroines, I have known them change characters for a whole evening together, and have wept with him and laughed with her, as it was their will and pleasure to ordain. I think in his comedy he was superior to any actor I ever saw in the same parts, except Emery. Alexander Drake’s comedy was like that of the French, who never appear to be acting at all; he was himself the comic being the author aimed at depicting. Let him speak whose words he would, from Shakspeare to Colman, it was impossible not to feel that half the fun was his own; he had, too, in a very high degree, the power that Fawcett possessed, of drawing tears by a sudden touch of natural feeling. His comic songs might have set the gravity of the judges and bishops together at defiance. Liston is great, but Alexander Drake was greater.
The theater in Cincinnati is small and not very fancy in decor, but since there weren't many other entertainment options, our young men often went there. On the bright, clear autumn and winter nights, the mile-and-a-half distance was not enough to stop the less adventurous family members from joining them sometimes. The main draw was the fantastic performances of Mr. and Mrs. Alexander Drake, the managers. Nothing could be more distinct than their acting styles, but their versatility allowed them to appear together frequently. She excelled in serious drama, while he specialized in broad comedy; yet, as Goldsmith mentions about his sister heroines, I’ve seen them swap roles for an entire evening, and I’ve wept with him and laughed with her at their whim. I believe he was better at comedy than any other actor I’ve seen in similar roles, except for Emery. Alexander Drake’s comedy was like that of the French, who never seem to be acting; he embodied the comedic character the author intended to portray. No matter whose lines he delivered, from Shakespeare to Colman, it was clear that half the fun came from him; he also had a remarkable ability, like Fawcett, to evoke tears with a sudden touch of genuine emotion. His comedic songs could have made even the most serious judges and bishops break into laughter. Liston is great, but Alexander Drake was even greater.
[4] Mr. Drake was an Englishman.
Mr. Drake was from the UK.
Mrs. Drake, formerly Miss Denny, greatly resembles Miss O’Neil; a proof of this is, that Mr. Kean, who had heard of the resemblance, arrived at New York late in the evening, and having repaired to the theatre, saw her for the first time across the stage, and immediately exclaimed, “that’s Miss Denny.” Her voice, too, has the same rich and touching tones, and is superior in power. Her talent is decidedly first-rate. Deep and genuine feeling, correct judgment, and the most perfect good taste, distinguish her play in every character. Her last act of Belvidera is superior in tragic effect to any thing I ever saw on the stage, the one great exception to all comparison, Mrs. Siddons, being set aside.
Mrs. Drake, formerly Miss Denny, looks a lot like Miss O’Neil; proof of this is that Mr. Kean, who had heard about the resemblance, arrived in New York late in the evening, went to the theater, and saw her for the first time across the stage. He immediately exclaimed, “that’s Miss Denny.” Her voice also has the same rich and emotional tones, and it’s even more powerful. Her talent is definitely top-notch. Deep and genuine emotion, sound judgment, and impeccable taste distinguish her performances in every role. Her final act as Belvidera has a tragic impact that surpasses anything I've ever seen on stage, with only one major exception, Mrs. Siddons, being excluded from that comparison.
It was painful to see these excellent performers playing to a miserable house, not a third full, and the audience probably not including half a dozen persons who would prefer their playing to that of the vilest strollers. In proof of this, I saw them, as managers, give place to paltry third-rate actors from London, who would immediately draw crowded houses, and be overwhelmed with applause.
It was painful to see these talented performers performing for a nearly empty theater, not even a third full, with an audience that likely didn't include more than a handful of people who would choose their performance over that of the worst street performers. To prove this, I watched as they, as managers, made way for mediocre third-rate actors from London, who would quickly fill the house and be showered with applause.
Poor Drake died just before we left Ohio, and his wife, who, besides her merit as an actress, is a most estimable and amiable woman, is left with a large family. I have little, or rather no doubt, of her being able to obtain an excellent engagement in London, but her having property in several of the Western theatres will, I fear, detain her in a neighbourhood, where she is neither understood nor appreciated. She told me many very excellent professional anecdotes collected during her residence in the West; one of these particularly amused me as a specimen of Western idiom. A lady who professed a great admiration for Mrs. Drake had obtained her permission to be present upon one occasion at her theatrical toilet. She was dressing for some character in which she was to stab herself, and her dagger was lying on the table. The visitor took it up, and examining it with much emotion, exclaimed, “what! do you really jab this into yourself sevagarous?”
Poor Drake passed away just before we left Ohio, and his wife, who, in addition to being a talented actress, is a very respectable and kind woman, is now left with a large family. I have little, or rather no doubt, that she will be able to land a great job in London, but her ownership of properties in several Western theaters will, I fear, keep her in a place where she is neither understood nor appreciated. She shared many interesting professional anecdotes from her time in the West; one of them particularly amused me as an example of Western slang. A lady who claimed to greatly admire Mrs. Drake had gotten her permission to watch her get ready for a performance. She was preparing for a role in which she had to stab herself, and her dagger was lying on the table. The visitor picked it up, examined it with great emotion, and exclaimed, “What! Do you really jab this into yourself severally?”
We also saw the great American star, Mr. Forrest. What he may become I will not pretend to prophesy; but when I saw him play Hamlet at Cincinnati, not even Mrs. Drake’s sweet Ophelia could keep me beyond the third act. It is true that I have seen Kemble, Macready, Kean, Young, C. Kemble, Cook, and Talma play Hamlet, and I might not, perhaps, be a very fair judge of this young actor’s merits; but I was greatly amused when a gentleman, who asked my opinion of him, told me upon hearing it, that he would not advise me to state it freely in America, “for they would not bear it.” The theatre was really not a bad one, though the very poor receipts rendered it impossible to keep it in high order; but an annoyance infinitely greater than decorations indifferently clean, was the style and manner of the audience. Men came into the lower tier of boxes without their coats; and I have seen shirt sleeves tucked up to the shoulder; the spitting was incessant, and the mixed smell of onions and whiskey was enough to make one feel even the Drakes’ acting dearly bought by the obligation of enduring its accompaniments. The bearing and attitudes of the men are perfectly indescribable; the heels thrown higher than the head, the entire rear of the person presented to the audience, the whole length supported on the benches, are among the varieties that these exquisite posture-masters exhibit. The noises, too, were perpetual, and of the most unpleasant kind; the applause is expressed by cries and thumping with the feet, instead of clapping; and when a patriotic fit seized them, and “Yankee Doodle” was called for, every man seemed to think his reputation as a citizen depended on the noise he made.
We also saw the great American star, Mr. Forrest. I won’t pretend to predict what he might become; but when I saw him perform Hamlet in Cincinnati, not even Mrs. Drake’s lovely Ophelia could keep me in my seat beyond the third act. I’ve seen Kemble, Macready, Kean, Young, C. Kemble, Cook, and Talma play Hamlet, so I might not be the best judge of this young actor’s talent; but I was really entertained when a gentleman asked my opinion about him and, upon hearing it, warned me not to share it openly in America, “because they wouldn’t handle it well.” The theater wasn’t too bad, although the very low ticket sales made it impossible to keep it in top shape; but an annoyance far worse than somewhat dirty decorations was the behavior and manner of the audience. Men entered the lower boxes without coats, and I’ve seen shirt sleeves rolled up to the shoulders; the spitting was nonstop, and the mixed smell of onions and whiskey was enough to make one feel that even the Drakes’ performance came with the price of enduring these distractions. The way the men carried themselves is completely indescribable; their heels thrown higher than their heads, rears faced toward the audience, legs stretched out on the benches—those are just some of the varieties these masterful poseurs displayed. The noise was constant and very unpleasant; instead of clapping, their applause consisted of shouts and thumping feet, and when a patriotic mood struck them and “Yankee Doodle” was called for, every man acted like his reputation as a citizen depended on how loud he could get.
Two very indifferent figurantes, probably from the Ambigu Comique, or la Gaiete, made their appearance at Cincinnati while we were there; and had Mercury stepped down, and danced a pas seul upon earth, his godship could not have produced a more violent sensation. But wonder and admiration were by no means the only feelings excited; horror and dismay were produced in at least an equal degree. No one, I believe, doubted their being admirable dancers, but every one agreed that the morals of the Western world would never recover the shock. When I was asked if I had ever seen any thing so dreadful before, I was embarrassed how to answer; for the young women had been exceedingly careful, both in their dress and in their dancing, to meet the taste of the people; but had it been Virginie in her most transparent attire, or Taglioni in her most remarkable pirouette, they could not have been more reprobated. The ladies altogether forsook the theatre; the gentlemen muttered under their breath, and turned their heads aside when the subject was mentioned; the clergy denounced them from the pulpit; and if they were named at the meetings of the saints, it was to show how deep the horror such a theme could produce. I could not but ask myself if virtue were a plant, thriving under one form in one country, and flourishing under a different one in another? If these Western Americans are right, then how dreadfully wrong are we! It is really a very puzzling subject.
Two pretty indifferent performers, probably from the Ambigu Comique or la Gaieté, showed up in Cincinnati while we were there; and if Mercury had come down and danced a solo on earth, his godship could not have caused a more intense reaction. But wonder and admiration weren’t the only feelings stirred; horror and shock were equally strong. No one, I think, doubted that they were fantastic dancers, but everyone agreed that the morals of the Western world would never recover from the shock. When I was asked if I had ever seen anything so awful before, I didn't know how to respond; the young women had been very careful, both in their outfits and their dancing, to appeal to the audience; but even if it had been Virginie in her most revealing costume or Taglioni in her most impressive spin, they couldn’t have been more condemned. The ladies completely abandoned the theater; the men muttered under their breath and turned away when the topic was brought up; the clergy condemned them from the pulpit; and if they were mentioned at the saints' meetings, it was to illustrate how deep the horror such a subject could evoke. I couldn’t help but wonder if virtue is a plant that thrives in one form in one country and flourishes in a different form in another? If these Western Americans are right, then how horrifically wrong are we! It’s truly a very puzzling topic.
But this was not the only point on which I found my notions of right and wrong utterly confounded; hardly a day passed in which I did not discover that something or other that I had been taught to consider lawful as eating, was held in abhorrence by those around me; many words to which I had never heard an objectionable meaning attached, were totally interdicted, and the strangest paraphrastic sentences substituted. I confess it struck me, that notwithstanding a general stiffness of manner, which I think must exceed that of the Scribes and Pharisees, the Americans have imaginations that kindle with alarming facility. I could give many anecdotes to prove this, but will content myself with a few.
But this wasn't the only area where my ideas of right and wrong were completely turned upside down; hardly a day went by without me realizing that something I was taught was acceptable, like eating, was looked down upon by those around me. Many words that I had never heard were considered offensive were completely banned, and the strangest reworded phrases were used instead. I admit it surprised me that, despite a general stiffness in behavior that I think surpasses that of the Scribes and Pharisees, Americans have imaginations that ignite with alarming ease. I could share many stories to illustrate this, but I’ll limit myself to just a few.
A young German gentleman of perfectly good manners, once came to me greatly chagrined at having offended one of the principal families in the neighbourhood, by having pronounced the word corset before the ladies of it. An old female friend had kindly overcome her own feelings so far as to mention to him the cause of the coolness he had remarked, and strongly advised his making an apology. He told me that he was perfectly well disposed to do so, but felt himself greatly at a loss how to word it.
A young German gentleman with excellent manners came to me, very upset about having offended one of the main families in the area by saying the word corset in front of the ladies. An older female friend had kindly put aside her own feelings to explain to him the reason for the coldness he had noticed and strongly suggested that he apologize. He told me he was completely willing to do so, but didn’t know how to phrase it.
An English lady who had long kept a fashionable boarding-school in one of the Atlantic cities, told me that one of her earliest cares with every new comer, was the endeavour to substitute real delicacy for this affected precision of manner; among many anecdotes, she told me one of a young lady about fourteen, who on entering the receiving room, where she only expected to see a lady who had enquired for her, and finding a young man with her, put her hands before her eyes, and ran out of the room again, screaming “A man! a man! a man!”
An English woman who had run a trendy boarding school in one of the Atlantic cities for a long time told me that one of her main concerns with every new student was to replace their fake precision with genuine grace. Among many stories, she shared one about a young girl, around fourteen, who, upon entering the reception room, where she thought she would only find a woman who had asked for her, saw a young man there instead. She immediately covered her eyes with her hands and ran out of the room, screaming, “A man! A man! A man!”
On another occasion, one of the young ladies in going up stairs to the drawing-room, unfortunately met a boy of fourteen coming down, and her feelings were so violently agitated, that she stopped panting and sobbing, nor would pass on till the boy had swung himself up on the upper banisters, to leave the passage free.
On another occasion, one of the young women was heading upstairs to the drawing room when she unexpectedly encountered a fourteen-year-old boy coming down. Her emotions were so overwhelming that she halted, breathless and sobbing, and refused to move on until the boy swung himself up onto the upper banisters to clear the passage.
At Cincinnati there is a garden where the people go to eat ices, and to look at roses. For the preservation of the flowers, there is placed at the end of one of the walks a sign-post sort of daub, representing a Swiss peasant girl, holding in her hand a scroll, requesting that the roses might not be gathered. Unhappily for the artist, or for the proprietor, or for both, the petticoat of this figure was so short as to shew her ancles. The ladies saw, and shuddered; and it was formally intimated to the proprietor, that if he wished for the patronage of the ladies of Cincinnati, he must have the petticoat of this figure lengthened. The affrighted purveyor of ices sent off an express for the artist and his paint pot. He came, but unluckily not provided with any colour that would match the petticoat; the necessity, however, was too urgent for delay, and a flounce of blue was added to the petticoat of red, giving bright and shining evidence before all men of the immaculate delicacy of the Cincinnati ladies.
At Cincinnati, there’s a garden where people go to enjoy ice cream and look at roses. To protect the flowers, there’s a sign at the end of one of the paths depicting a Swiss peasant girl holding a scroll that asks visitors not to pick the roses. Unfortunately for the artist, the owner, or both, the girl’s dress was so short that it showed her ankles. The ladies noticed and were appalled; they formally informed the owner that if he wanted the support of Cincinnati’s women, he needed to lengthen the dress. The nervous ice cream vendor quickly sent for the artist and his paint supplies. He arrived, but unfortunately didn’t have any paint that matched the dress; however, the situation was too urgent to wait, so they added a blue frill to the red dress, providing clear evidence of the Cincinnati ladies’ modesty.
I confess I was sometimes tempted to suspect that this ultra refinement was not very deep seated. It often appeared to me like the consciousness of grossness, that wanted a veil; but the veil was never gracefully adjusted. Occasionally, indeed, the very same persons who appeared ready to faint at the idea of a statue, would utter some unaccountable sally that was quite startling, and which made me feel that the indelicacy of which we were accused had its limits. The following anecdote is hardly fit to tell, but it explains what I mean too well to be omitted.
I admit I was sometimes tempted to think that this extreme refinement wasn’t very genuine. It often seemed to me like an awareness of something crude that needed hiding, but the disguise was never done neatly. Sometimes, the same people who looked like they might faint at the thought of a statue would let slip some shocking remark that made me realize the indelicacy we were accused of had its limits. The following story is almost too inappropriate to share, but it illustrates my point too clearly to leave out.
A young married lady, of high standing and most fastidious delicacy, who had been brought up at one of the Atlantic seminaries of highest reputation, told me that her house, at the distance of half a mile from a populous city, was unfortunately opposite a mansion of worse than doubtful reputation. “It is abominable,” she said, “to see the people that go there; they ought to be exposed. I and another lady, an intimate friend of mine, did make one of them look foolish enough last summer: she was passing the day with me, and, while we were sitting at the window, we saw a young man we both knew ride up there, we went into the garden and watched at the gate for him to come back, and when he did, we both stepped out, and I said to him, “are you not ashamed, Mr. William D., to ride by my house and back again in that manner?” I never saw a man look so foolish!”
A young married woman, of high status and very particular taste, who had been educated at one of the top Atlantic seminaries, told me that her house, located half a mile from a busy city, unfortunately faced a mansion with a questionable reputation. “It’s disgusting,” she said, “to see the kind of people who go there; they should be called out. Last summer, my friend and I made one of them look pretty silly: she was spending the day with me, and while we were sitting by the window, we saw a young man we both knew ride up there. We went into the garden and waited at the gate for him to come back. When he did, we both stepped out, and I said to him, ‘Aren’t you ashamed, Mr. William D., to ride by my house and back like that?’ I’ve never seen a man look so embarrassed!”
In conversing with ladies on the customs and manners of Europe, I remarked a strong propensity to consider every thing as wrong to which they were not accustomed. I once mentioned to a young lady that I thought a picnic party would be very agreeable, and that I would propose it to some of our friends. She agreed that it would be delightful, but she added, “I fear you will not succeed; we are not used to such sort of things here, and I know it is considered very indelicate for ladies and gentlemen to sit down together on the grass.”
In talking to women about the customs and manners in Europe, I noticed a strong tendency to view anything unfamiliar as wrong. I once suggested to a young woman that a picnic would be really nice, and that I would propose it to some of our friends. She agreed that it would be wonderful, but she added, “I worry you won’t succeed; we’re not used to things like that here, and I know it’s seen as very improper for men and women to sit together on the grass.”
I could multiply anecdotes of this nature; but I think these sufficient to give an accurate idea of the tone of manners in this particular, and I trust to justify the observations I have made.
I could share more stories like this, but I think these are enough to give a clear picture of the attitude and behavior in this regard, and I hope they justify the points I've made.
One of the spectacles which produced the greatest astonishment on us all was the Republican simplicity of the courts of justice. We had heard that the judges indulged themselves on the bench in those extraordinary attitudes which, doubtless, some peculiarity of the American formation leads them to find the most comfortable. Of this we were determined to judge for ourselves, and accordingly entered the court when it was in full business, with three judges on the bench. The annexed sketch will better describe what we saw than any thing I can write.
One of the things that amazed us the most was the straightforwardness of the courts. We had heard that the judges often sat in unusual positions that, for some reason specific to American culture, they seemed to find the most comfortable. We were eager to see for ourselves, so we went into the courtroom while it was in session, with three judges on the bench. The picture included will explain what we saw better than anything I can describe.
Our winter passed rapidly away, and pleasantly enough, by the help of frosty walks, a little skaiting, a visit to Big-Bone Lick, and a visit to the shaking Quakers, a good deal of chess, and a good deal of reading, notwithstanding we were almost in the back woods of Western America.
Our winter flew by quickly and quite enjoyably, thanks to some chilly walks, a bit of skating, a trip to Big-Bone Lick, a visit to the Shaking Quakers, plenty of chess, and a lot of reading, even though we were pretty much in the backwoods of Western America.
The excursion to Big-Bone Lick, in Kentucky, and that to the Quaker village, were too fatiguing for females at such a season, but our gentlemen brought us home mammoth bones and shaking Quaker stories in abundance.
The trip to Big-Bone Lick in Kentucky and the visit to the Quaker village were too exhausting for the women at this time of year, but our gentlemen returned home with plenty of mammoth bones and exciting Quaker stories.
These singular people, the shaking Quakers of America, give undeniable proof that communities may exist and prosper, for they have continued for many years to adhere strictly to this manner of life, and have been constantly increasing in wealth. They have formed two or three different societies in distant parts of the Union, all governed by the same general laws, and all uniformly prosperous and flourishing.
These unique individuals, the shaking Quakers of America, provide clear evidence that communities can thrive and succeed. They have consistently committed to this way of life for many years and have steadily grown in wealth. They have established two or three different groups in various regions of the country, all following the same general principles, and all equally prosperous and thriving.
There must be some sound and wholesome principle at work in these establishments to cause their success in every undertaking, and this principle must be a powerful one, for it has to combat much that is absurd and much that is mischievous.
There has to be some solid and healthy principle driving these businesses to succeed in everything they do, and this principle must be strong because it has to fight against a lot that is ridiculous and a lot that is harmful.
The societies are generally composed of about an equal proportion of males and females, many of them being men and their wives; but they are all bound by their laws not to cohabit together. Their religious observances are wholly confined to singing and dancing of the most grotesque kind, and this repeated so constantly as to occupy much time; yet these people become rich and powerful wherever they settle themselves. Whatever they manufacture, whatever their farms produce, is always in the highest repute, and brings the highest price in the market. They receive all strangers with great courtesy, and if they bring an introduction they are lodged and fed for any length of time they choose to stay; they are not asked to join in their labours, but are permitted to do so if they wish it.
The communities are mostly made up of an equal number of men and women, many of whom are husbands and their wives; however, they are all required by their laws not to live together. Their religious practices consist solely of singing and dancing in the most bizarre ways, and this happens so often that it takes up a lot of their time; still, these people become wealthy and influential wherever they settle. Everything they produce, whether it's manufactured goods or agricultural products, is always highly regarded and fetches top prices in the market. They welcome all visitors graciously, and if someone comes with an introduction, they are provided with food and accommodation for as long as they wish to stay; they are not compelled to help with the work but are allowed to join in if they choose.
The Big-Bone Lick was not visited, and even partially examined, without considerable fatigue.
The Big-Bone Lick wasn't visited or even partially explored without a lot of exhaustion.
It appeared from the account of our travellers, that the spot which gives the region its elegant name is a deep bed of blue clay, tenacious and unsound, so much so as to render it both difficult and dangerous to traverse. The digging it has been found so laborious that no one has yet hazarded the expense of a complete search into its depths for the gigantic relics so certainly hidden there. The clay has never been moved without finding some of them; and I think it can hardly be doubted that money and perseverance would procure a more perfect specimen of an entire mammoth than we have yet seen.[5]
It seemed from the travelers' account that the place giving the region its fancy name is a deep layer of blue clay that is sticky and unstable, making it both hard and risky to cross. Digging it up has proven to be so challenging that no one has dared to spend the money on a full search for the huge fossils that are likely buried there. Every time the clay has been disturbed, some of these fossils have been found; and I think it's clear that with enough funding and determination, a better specimen of a complete mammoth could be obtained than what we’ve seen so far.[5]
[5] Since the above was written an immense skeleton, nearly perfect, has been extracted.
[5] Since then, a nearly perfect skeleton has been uncovered.
And now the time arrived that our domestic circle was again to be broken up. Our eldest son was to be entered at Oxford, and it was necessary that his father should accompany him; and, after considerable indecision, it was at length determined that I and my daughters should remain another year, with our second son. It was early in February, and our travellers prepared themselves to encounter some sharp gales upon the mountains, though the great severity of the cold appeared to be past. We got buffalo robes and double shoes prepared for them, and they were on the eve of departure when we heard that General Jackson, the newly-elected President, was expected to arrive immediately at Cincinnati, from his residence in the West, and to proceed by steamboat to Pittsburgh, on his way to Washington. This determined them not to fix the day of their departure till they heard of his arrival, and then, if possible, to start in the same boat with him; the decent dignity of a private conveyance not being deemed necessary for the President of the United States.
And now the time had come for our family to be split up again. Our oldest son was set to enroll at Oxford, and his father needed to go with him. After a lot of back-and-forth, it was finally decided that my daughters and I would stay another year with our second son. It was early February, and our travelers were getting ready to face some strong winds in the mountains, although the worst of the cold seemed to be over. We got buffalo robes and thick shoes ready for them, and they were about to leave when we heard that General Jackson, the newly-elected President, was expected to arrive soon in Cincinnati from his home in the West and take a steamboat to Pittsburgh on his way to Washington. This made them decide to wait to set their departure date until they knew when he would arrive, and if possible, to leave on the same boat as him since a private transport didn't seem necessary for the President of the United States.
The day of his arrival was however quite uncertain, and we could only determine to have every thing very perfectly in readiness, let it come when it would. This resolution was hardly acted upon when the news reached us that the General had arrived at Louisville, and was expected at Cincinnati in a few hours. All was bustle and hurry at Mohawk-cottage; we quickly dispatched our packing business, and this being the first opportunity we had had of witnessing such a demonstration of popular feeling, we all determined to be present at the debarkation of the great man. We accordingly walked to Cincinnati, and secured a favourable station at the landing-place, both for the purpose of seeing the first magistrate and of observing his reception by the people. We had waited but a few moments when the heavy panting of the steam engines and then a discharge of cannon told that we were just in time; another moment brought his vessel in sight.
The day of his arrival was pretty uncertain, and we could only plan to have everything ready, no matter when it happened. We had barely started on this plan when we got the news that the General had arrived in Louisville and was expected in Cincinnati in a few hours. There was a flurry of activity at Mohawk Cottage; we quickly finished our packing, and since this was our first chance to see such a display of public excitement, we all decided to be there when the important man arrived. So, we walked to Cincinnati and found a good spot at the landing to watch both the arrival of the top official and how the crowd welcomed him. We had only waited a few moments when the loud hissing of the steam engines and then the sound of cannon fire signaled that we had arrived just in time; a moment later, his boat came into view.
Nothing could be better of its kind than his approach to the shore: the noble steam-boat which conveyed him was flanked on each side by one of nearly equal size and splendour; the roofs of all three were covered by a crowd of men; cannon saluted them from the shore as they passed by, to the distance of a quarter of a mile above the town; there they turned about, and came down the river with a rapid but stately motion, the three vessels so close together as to appear one mighty mass upon the water.
Nothing could be better than his approach to the shore: the impressive steamboat that carried him was flanked on both sides by another of nearly the same size and grandeur; the roofs of all three were filled with people; cannons fired a salute from the shore as they passed by, reaching a quarter of a mile above the town; there they turned around and glided down the river with a swift yet dignified motion, the three vessels so close together that they looked like one massive entity on the water.
When they arrived opposite the principal landing they swept gracefully round, and the side vessels, separating themselves from the centre, fell a few feet back, permitting her to approach before them with her honoured freight. All this manoeuvring was extremely well executed, and really beautiful.
When they got to the main landing, they smoothly turned around, and the side boats moved away from the center, backing up a few feet to let her come forward with her esteemed cargo. All of this maneuvering was executed very well and was truly beautiful.
The crowd on the shore awaited her arrival in perfect stillness. When she touched the bank the people on board gave a faint huzza, but it was answered by no note of welcome from the land: this cold silence was certainly not produced by any want of friendly feeling towards the new President; during the whole of the canvassing he had been decidedly the popular candidate at Cincinnati, and, for months past, we had been accustomed to the cry of “Jackson for ever” from an overwhelming majority; but enthusiasm is not either the virtue or the vice of America.
The crowd on the shore waited for her arrival in complete silence. When she reached the bank, the people on board let out a small cheer, but there was no response from the land: this chilly silence definitely wasn’t due to any lack of goodwill towards the new President. Throughout the campaigning, he had been the clear favorite in Cincinnati, and for months, we had grown used to hearing “Jackson forever” from a huge majority; however, enthusiasm is neither a strength nor a weakness of America.
More than one private carriage was stationed at the water’s edge to await the General’s orders, but they were dismissed with the information that he would walk to the hotel. Upon receiving this intimation the silent crowd divided itself in a very orderly manner, leaving a space for him to walk through them. He did so, uncovered, though the distance was considerable, and the weather very cold; but he alone (with the exception of a few European gentlemen who were present) was without a hat. He wore his grey hair, carelessly, but not ungracefully arranged, and, spite of his harsh gaunt features, he looks like a gentleman and a soldier. He was in deep mourning, having very recently lost his wife; they were said to have been very happy together, and I was pained by hearing a voice near me exclaim, as he approached the spot where I stood, “There goes Jackson, where is his wife?” Another sharp voice, at a little distance, cried, “Adams for ever!” And these sounds were all I heard to break the silence.
More than one private carriage was waiting at the water’s edge for the General's orders, but they were turned away with the news that he would be walking to the hotel. When this message was received, the quiet crowd parted smoothly, creating a path for him to walk through. He did so, without a hat, even though the distance was significant and it was very cold; he was the only one (besides a few European gentlemen nearby) without one. His grey hair was styled carelessly but still managed to look good, and despite his harsh, gaunt features, he appeared to be a gentleman and a soldier. He was dressed in deep mourning, having recently lost his wife; they were said to have been very happy together, and I felt a pang when I heard someone near me exclaim as he passed by, “There goes Jackson, where is his wife?” Another voice called out from a bit further away, “Adams forever!” And those were the only sounds that broke the silence.
“They manage these matters better” in the East, I have no doubt, but as yet I was still in the West, and still inclined to think, that however meritorious the American character may be, it is not amiable.
“They handle these things better” in the East, I have no doubt, but I was still in the West, and still inclined to think that, no matter how commendable the American character might be, it is not charming.
Mr. T. and his sons joined the group of citizens who waited upon him to the hotel, and were presented to the President in form; that is, they shook hands with him. Learning that he intended to remain a few hours there, or more properly, that it would be a few hours before the steam-boat would be ready to proceed, Mr. T. secured berths on board, and returned, to take a hasty dinner with us. At the hour appointed by the captain, Mr. T. and his son accompanied the General on board; and by subsequent letters I learnt that they had conversed a good deal with him, and were pleased by his conversation and manners, but deeply disgusted by the brutal familiarity to which they saw him exposed at every place on their progress at which they stopped; I am tempted to quote one passage, as sufficiently descriptive of the manner, which so painfully grated against their European feelings.
Mr. T. and his sons joined the group of citizens who accompanied him to the hotel, where they formally met the President; that is, they shook his hand. Learning that he intended to stay there for a few hours, or more accurately, that it would be a few hours before the steamship was ready to leave, Mr. T. reserved spots on board and came back to have a quick dinner with us. At the time set by the captain, Mr. T. and his son went on board with the General; and from later letters, I found out that they had talked quite a bit with him and appreciated his conversation and demeanor, but were utterly appalled by the rude familiarity he faced at every stop along the way; I'm tempted to quote one passage, as it clearly illustrates the style, which was so uncomfortably jarring to their European sensibilities.
‘There was not a hulking boy from a keel-boat who was not introduced to the President, unless, indeed, as was the case with some, they introduced themselves: for instance, I was at his elbow when a greasy fellow accosted him thus:-
‘There wasn't a big guy from a keelboat who didn’t get introduced to the President, unless, of course, like some others, they just introduced themselves: for example, I was right next to him when a greasy guy approached him like this:-
“General Jackson, I guess?”
"General Jackson, I suppose?"
‘The General bowed assent.
'The General nodded in agreement.
“Why they told me you was dead.”
“Why did they tell me you were dead?”
“No! Providence has hitherto preserved my life.”
“No! Fate has kept me alive until now.”
“And is your wife alive too?”
“And is your wife alive, too?”
‘The General, apparently much hurt, signified the contrary, upon which the courtier concluded his harangue, by saying, “Aye, I thought it was the one or the t’other of ye.”’
‘The General, seeming quite upset, indicated otherwise, after which the courtier wrapped up his speech by saying, “Yeah, I figured it was one of you two.”’
CHAPTER XIV
American Spring—Controversy between Messrs. Owen and Cambell—Public ball—Separation of the sexes—American freedom—Execution
American Spring—Disagreement between Mr. Owen and Mr. Cambell—Public dance—Separation of genders—American liberty—Execution
The American spring is by no means so agreeable as the American autumn; both move with faultering step, and slow; but this lingering pace, which is delicious in autumn, is most tormenting in the spring. In the one case you are about to part with a friend, who is becoming more gentle and agreeable at every step, and such steps can hardly be made too slowly; but in the other you are making your escape from a dreary cavern, where you have been shut up with black frost and biting blasts, and where your best consolation was being smoke-dried.
The American spring is definitely not as pleasant as the American autumn; both move with a hesitant and sluggish pace, but while this slow tempo is delightful in autumn, it’s incredibly frustrating in spring. In the former, you’re preparing to say goodbye to a friend, who becomes kinder and more pleasant with every moment, and those moments cannot be prolonged enough; however, in spring, you’re trying to break free from a gloomy cave where you’ve been trapped with harsh cold and chilling winds, and your only comfort has been the feeling of being dried out by smoke.
But, upon second thoughts, I believe it would be more correct, instead of complaining of the slow pace of the American spring, to declare that they have no spring at all. The beautiful autumn often lingers on till Christmas, after which winter can be trifled with no longer, and generally keeps a stubborn hold through the months which we call spring, when he suddenly turns his back, and summer takes his place.
But on second thought, I think it would be more accurate, instead of complaining about the slow pace of spring in America, to say that they don’t have spring at all. The lovely autumn often hangs around until Christmas, after which winter can’t be ignored any longer and usually sticks around through the months we call spring, when it suddenly retreats, and summer comes in.
The inconceivable uncertainty of the climate is, however, such, that I will not venture to state about what time this change takes place, for it is certain, that let me name what time I would, it would be easy for any weather journaliser to prove me wrong, by quoting that the thermometer was at 100 at a period which my statement included in the winter; or 50 long after I made the summer commence.
The unpredictable nature of the climate is such that I won’t even try to say when this change happens. No matter what time I mention, it would be simple for any weather reporter to disprove me by pointing out that the thermometer hit 100 during a time I said was winter, or 50 long after I declared summer had started.
The climate of England is called uncertain, but it can never, I think, be so described by any who have experienced that of the United States. A gentleman, on whose accuracy I could depend, told me he had repeatedly known the thermometer vary above 40 degrees in the space of twelve hours. This most unpleasant caprice of the temperature is, I conceive, one cause of the unhealthiness of the climate.
The weather in England is often described as unpredictable, but I don’t think anyone who has experienced the weather in the United States would agree. A reliable gentleman told me he had seen the temperature change by more than 40 degrees within just twelve hours. I believe this erratic shift in temperature is one reason why the climate can be unhealthy.
At length, however, after shivering and shaking till we were tired of it, and having been half ruined in fire-wood (which, by the way, is nearly as dear as at Paris, and dearer in many parts of the Union), the summer burst upon us full blown, and the ice-house, the piazza, and the jalousies were again in full requisition.
At last, after shaking and shivering until we were exhausted, and having spent a lot on firewood (which, by the way, is almost as expensive as it is in Paris, and even pricier in many areas of the country), summer arrived suddenly, and the ice house, the porch, and the shutters were all being used again.
It was in the early summer of this year (1829) that Cincinnati offered a spectacle unprecedented, I believe, in any age or country. Mr. Owen, of Lanark, of New Harmony, of Texas, well known to the world by all or either of these additions, had challenged the whole religious public of the United States to discuss with him publicly the truth or falsehood of all the religions that had ever been propagated on the face of the earth; stating, further, that he undertook to prove that they were all equally false, and nearly equally mischievous. This most appalling challenge was conveyed to the world through the medium of New Orleans newspapers, and for some time it remained unanswered; at length the Reverend Alexander Campbell, from Bethany, (not of Judaea, but of Kentucky,) proclaimed, through the same medium, that he was ready to take up the gauntlet. The place fixed for this extraordinary discussion was Cincinnati; the time, the second Monday in May, 1829, being about a year from the time the challenge was accepted; thus giving the disputants time to prepare themselves.
It was early summer of this year (1829) when Cincinnati presented a spectacle that I believe has never been seen in any age or country. Mr. Owen, known from Lanark, New Harmony, and Texas, had challenged the entire religious community of the United States to publicly debate the truth or falsehood of all religions ever spread across the earth. He further claimed that he could prove they were all equally false and nearly as harmful. This shocking challenge was announced through New Orleans newspapers and went unanswered for a while; eventually, the Reverend Alexander Campbell from Bethany (not in Judea, but in Kentucky) declared, through the same channels, that he was ready to take on the challenge. The extraordinary debate was set to take place in Cincinnati on the second Monday in May, 1829, approximately a year after the challenge was accepted, allowing both parties time to prepare.
Mr. Owen’s preparation, however, could only have been such as those who run may read, for, during the interval, he traversed great part of North America, crossed the Atlantic twice, visited England, Scotland, Mexico, Texas, and I know not how many places besides.
Mr. Owen's preparation could only have been what those who rush might understand, because during that time, he traveled extensively across North America, crossed the Atlantic twice, and visited England, Scotland, Mexico, Texas, and who knows how many other places.
Mr. Campbell, I was told, passed this period very differently, being engaged in reading with great research and perseverance all the theological works within his reach. But whatever confidence the learning and piety of Mr. Campbell might have inspired in his friends, or in the Cincinnati Christians in general, it was not, as it appeared, sufficient to induce Mr. Wilson, the Presbyterian minister of the largest church in the town, to permit the display of them within its walls. This refusal was greatly reprobated, and much regretted, as the curiosity to hear the discussion was very general, and no other edifice offered so much accommodation.
Mr. Campbell, I heard, spent this time quite differently, immersing himself in studying all the theological works he could find with great diligence and perseverance. But no matter how much confidence Mr. Campbell's knowledge and faith inspired in his friends or among the Cincinnati Christians in general, it still wasn't enough to convince Mr. Wilson, the Presbyterian minister of the largest church in town, to allow them to be showcased inside. This decision was widely criticized and deeply regretted, as there was a strong curiosity to hear the discussion, and no other building could provide as much room.
A Methodist meeting-house, large enough to contain a thousand persons, was at last chosen; a small stage was arranged round the pulpit, large enough to accommodate the disputants and their stenographers; the pulpit itself was throughout the whole time occupied by the aged father of Mr. Campbell, whose flowing white hair, and venerable countenance, constantly expressive of the deepest attention, and the most profound interest, made him a very striking figure in the group. Another platform was raised in a conspicuous part of the building, on which were seated seven gentlemen of the city, selected as moderators.
A Methodist meeting house, large enough to hold a thousand people, was finally chosen; a small stage was set up around the pulpit, big enough for the speakers and their note-takers; the pulpit itself was occupied throughout the event by Mr. Campbell's elderly father, whose long white hair and distinguished face, always showing deep focus and genuine interest, made him a very notable figure in the group. Another platform was built in a visible area of the building, where seven gentlemen from the city were seated as moderators.
The chapel was equally divided, one half being appropriated to ladies, the other to gentlemen; and the door of entrance reserved for the ladies was carefully guarded by persons appointed to prevent any crowding or difficulty from impeding their approach. I suspect that the ladies were indebted to Mr. Owen for this attention; the arrangements respecting them on this occasion were by no means American.
The chapel was split in half, with one side designated for ladies and the other for gentlemen; and the entrance door reserved for the ladies was closely monitored by appointed individuals to avoid any crowding or issues blocking their way. I have a feeling that the ladies owed this courtesy to Mr. Owen; the arrangements for them this time were definitely not American.
When Mr. Owen rose, the building was thronged in every part; the audience, or congregation, (I hardly know which to call them) were of the highest rank of citizens, and as large a proportion of best bonnets fluttered there, as the “two horned church” itself could boast.
When Mr. Owen stood up, the building was packed in every corner; the crowd, or congregation (I'm not sure what to call them), consisted of the top tier of citizens, and as many fancy hats were visible there as the "two-horned church" itself could claim.
It was in the profoundest silence, and apparently with the deepest attention, that Mr. Owen’s opening address was received; and surely it was the most singular one that ever Christian men and women sat to listen to.
It was in complete silence, and seemingly with the utmost focus, that Mr. Owen's opening speech was received; and it was definitely the most unique one that any group of Christian men and women had ever gathered to hear.
When I recollect its object, and the uncompromising manner in which the orator stated his mature conviction that the whole history of the Christian mission was a fraud, and its sacred origin a fable, I cannot but wonder that it was so listened to; yet at the time I felt no such wonder. Never did any one practise the suaviter in modo with more powerful effect than Mr. Owen. The gentle tone of his voice; his mild, sometimes playful, but never ironical manner; the absence of every vehement or harsh expression; the affectionate interest expressed for “the whole human family,” the air of candour with which he expressed his wish to be convinced he was wrong, if he indeed were so—his kind smile—the mild expression of his eyes—in short, his whole manner, disarmed zeal, and produced a degree of tolerance that those who did not hear him would hardly believe possible.
When I think back on it, and the straightforward way the speaker expressed his strong belief that the entire history of the Christian mission was a fraud, and its holy origins a myth, I can't help but wonder how it was so well received; yet at the time, I felt no such amazement. No one ever practiced the suaviter in modo with more impact than Mr. Owen. The gentle tone of his voice, his soft, sometimes playful, but never sarcastic demeanor, the absence of any intense or harsh words, the genuine care he showed for “the whole human family,” and the sense of honesty with which he expressed his desire to be proven wrong, if he really was—his kind smile, the gentle look in his eyes—in short, his entire presence disarmed passion and created a level of tolerance that those who didn’t hear him would hardly believe possible.
Half an hour was the time allotted for each haranguer; when this was expired, the moderators were seen to look at their watches. Mr. Owen, too, looked at his (without pausing) smiled, shook his head, and said in a parenthesis “a moment’s patience,” and continued for nearly another half hour.
Half an hour was the time given to each speaker; when that time was up, the moderators checked their watches. Mr. Owen also looked at his (without stopping), smiled, shook his head, and said in passing, "just a moment's patience," and went on for almost another half hour.
Mr. Campbell then arose; his person, voice, and manner all greatly in his favour. In his first attack he used the arms, which in general have been considered as belonging to the other side of the question. He quizzed Mr. Owen most unmercifully; pinched him here for his parallelograms; hit him there for his human perfectibility, and kept the whole audience in a roar of laughter. Mr. Owen joined in it most heartily himself, and listened to him throughout with the air of a man who is delighted at the good things he is hearing, and exactly in the cue to enjoy all the other good things that he is sure will follow. Mr. Campbell’s watch was the only one which reminded us that we had listened to him for half an hour; and having continued speaking for a few minutes after he had looked at it, he sat down with, I should think, the universal admiration of his auditory.
Mr. Campbell then stood up; his presence, voice, and demeanor were all very much in his favor. In his first remarks, he used arguments that are generally seen as belonging to the opposing side. He mockingly criticized Mr. Owen without holding back; he teased him for his parallelograms, poked fun at his ideas about human perfection, and kept the entire audience laughing uproariously. Mr. Owen joined in the laughter wholeheartedly and listened to him with the expression of someone who is thrilled with the clever points being made and ready to enjoy all the other great things that are sure to come. Mr. Campbell’s watch was the only reminder that we had been listening for half an hour; after speaking for a few more minutes following a glance at it, he sat down, and I believe he had the overall admiration of everyone present.
Mr. Owen again addressed us; and his first five minutes were occupied in complimenting Mr. Campbell with all the strength his exceeding hearty laughter had left him. But then he changed his tone, and said the business was too serious to permit the next half hour to pass so lightly and so pleasantly as the last; and then he read us what he called his twelve fundamental laws of human nature. These twelve laws he has taken so much trouble to circulate to all the nations of the earth, that it must be quite unnecessary to repeat them here. To me they appear twelve truisms, that no man in his senses would ever think of contradicting; but how any one can have conceived that the explanation and defence of these laws could furnish forth occupation for his pen and his voice, through whole years of unwearying declamation, or how he can have dreamed that they could be twisted into a refutation of the Christian religion, is a mystery which I never expect to understand.
Mr. Owen spoke to us again, and for the first five minutes, he complimented Mr. Campbell with all the energy his hearty laughter could muster. But then he changed his tone, saying that the matter was too serious to let the next half hour pass as lightly and pleasantly as the last. He then shared what he called his twelve fundamental laws of human nature. He has put so much effort into spreading these laws to all the nations that there's no need to repeat them here. To me, they seem like twelve obvious truths that no sensible person would think to contradict. However, how anyone could believe that explaining and defending these laws could provide enough material for years of endless talk, or how they could think these laws could somehow undermine the Christian religion, is a mystery I'll never understand.
From this time Mr. Owen entrenched himself behind his twelve laws, and Mr. Campbell, with equal gravity, confined himself to bringing forward the most elaborate theological authorities in evidence of the truth of revealed religion.
From this point on, Mr. Owen set himself firmly behind his twelve laws, while Mr. Campbell, with the same seriousness, focused on presenting the most detailed theological sources to support the truth of revealed religion.
Neither appeared to me to answer the other; but to confine themselves to the utterance of what they had uppermost in their own minds when the discussion began. I lamented this on the side of Mr. Campbell, as I am persuaded he would have been much more powerful had he trusted more to himself and less to his books. Mr. Owen is an extraordinary man, and certainly possessed of talent, but he appears to me so utterly benighted in the mists of his own theories, that he has quite lost the power of looking through them, so as to get a peep at the world as it really exists around him.
Neither seemed to really respond to each other; they just focused on expressing what was on their minds when the discussion started. I regretted this for Mr. Campbell, as I believe he would have been much more impactful if he had relied more on himself and less on his books. Mr. Owen is an extraordinary man and clearly talented, but he seems so completely lost in the fog of his own theories that he has entirely lost the ability to see the world as it actually is around him.
At the conclusion of the debate (which lasted for fifteen sittings) Mr. Campbell desired the whole assembly to sit down. They obeyed. He then requested all who wished well to Christianity to rise, and a very large majority were in an instant on their legs. He again requested them to be seated, and then desired those who believed not in its doctrines to rise, and a few gentlemen and one lady obeyed. Mr. Owen protested against this manoeuvre, as he called it, and refused to believe that it afforded any proof of the state of men’s minds, or of women’s either; declaring, that not only was such a result to be expected, in the present state of things, but that it was the duty of every man who had children to feed, not to hazard the sale of his hogs, or his iron, by a declaration of opinions which might offend the majority of his customers. It was said, that at the end of the fifteen meetings the numerical amount of the Christians and the Infidels of Cincinnati remained exactly what it was when they began.
At the end of the debate (which lasted for fifteen sessions), Mr. Campbell asked everyone in the assembly to sit down. They did so. He then requested everyone who supported Christianity to stand up, and a large majority quickly got to their feet. He asked them to sit again and then requested those who didn’t believe in its teachings to stand. A few gentlemen and one lady complied. Mr. Owen opposed this tactic, as he called it, and refused to believe it showed the true feelings of people's minds, or women's minds for that matter; he stated that such a result was expected given the current situation, and that every man with children to support should not risk losing his livestock or his materials by expressing opinions that might upset most of his customers. It was said that at the end of the fifteen meetings, the number of Christians and non-believers in Cincinnati remained exactly the same as when they started.
This was a result that might have been perhaps anticipated; but what was much less to have been expected, neither of the disputants ever appeared to lose their temper. I was told they were much in each other’s company, constantly dining together, and on all occasions expressed most cordially their mutual esteem.
This was a result that could have been expected; however, what was much less expected was that neither of the debaters ever seemed to lose their cool. I was told they spent a lot of time together, often dining together, and on every occasion, they expressed their mutual respect very warmly.
All this I think could only have happened in America. I am not quite sure that it was very desirable it should have happened any where.
All of this, I believe, could only have happened in America. I'm not entirely sure it was a good thing for it to happen anywhere else.
In noting the various brilliant events which diversified our residence in the western metropolis, I have omitted to mention the Birthday Ball, as it is called, a festivity which, I believe, has place on the 22nd of February, in every town and city throughout the Union. It is the anniversary of the birth of General Washington, and well deserves to be marked by the Americans as a day of jubilee.
In mentioning the many exciting events that made our time in the western city lively, I forgot to mention the Birthday Ball, which is what it’s called. This celebration, I believe, takes place on February 22nd in every town and city across the country. It’s the anniversary of General Washington’s birth and definitely deserves to be celebrated by Americans as a day of joy.
I was really astonished at the coup d’oeil on entering, for I saw a large room filled with extremely well-dressed company, among whom were many very beautiful girls. The gentlemen also were exceedingly smart, but I had not yet been long enough in Western America not to feel startled at recognising in almost every full-dressed beau that passed me, the master or shopman that I had been used to see behind the counter, or lolling at the door of every shop in the city. The fairest and finest belles smiled and smirked on them with as much zeal and satisfaction as I ever saw bestowed on an eldest son, and I therefore could feel no doubt of their being considered as of the highest rank. Yet it must not be supposed that there is no distinction of classes: at this same ball I was looking among the many very beautiful girls I saw there for one more beautiful still, with whose lovely face I had been particularly struck at the school examination I have mentioned. I could not find her, and asked a gentleman why the beautiful Miss C. was not there.
I was really surprised when I walked in, because I saw a large room filled with really well-dressed people, including many stunning girls. The guys were also very stylish, but I hadn’t been in Western America long enough to not be shocked at recognizing almost every well-dressed guy that passed me as the owner or shopkeeper I was used to seeing behind the counter or lounging at the door of every store in the city. The prettiest and finest girls smiled and flirted with them as eagerly and happily as I've ever seen given to an eldest son, so I had no doubt they were regarded as being of the highest status. However, it shouldn't be assumed that there’s no class distinction: at this same ball, I was looking among the many beautiful girls for one who was even more beautiful, whose lovely face I had been particularly struck by at the school exam I mentioned. I couldn’t find her and asked a guy why the beautiful Miss C. wasn't there.
“You do not yet understand our aristocracy,” he replied, “the family of Miss C. are mechanics.”
“You still don’t get our aristocracy,” he replied, “Miss C.’s family are mechanics.”
“But the young lady has been educated at the same school as these, whom I see here, and I know her brother has a shop in the town, quite as large, and apparently as prosperous, as those belonging to any of these young men. What is the difference?”
“But the young lady has been educated at the same school as these, whom I see here, and I know her brother has a shop in the town, just as large and seemingly as successful as those owned by any of these young men. What’s the difference?”
“He is a mechanic; he assists in making the articles he sells; the others call themselves merchants.”
“He’s a mechanic; he helps create the items he sells; the others refer to themselves as merchants.”
The dancing was not quite like, yet not very unlike, what we see at an assize or race-ball in a country town. They call their dances cotillions instead of quadrilles, and the figures are called from the orchestra in English, which has very ludicrous effect on European ears.
The dancing was similar yet not entirely the same as what we see at a local court or a race ball in a small town. They refer to their dances as cotillions instead of quadrilles, and the figures are called out from the orchestra in English, which sounds quite funny to European ears.
The arrangements for the supper were very singular, but eminently characteristic of the country. The gentlemen had a splendid entertainment spread for them in another large room of the hotel, while the poor ladies had each a plate put into their hands, as they pensively promenaded the ballroom during their absence; and shortly afterwards servants appeared, bearing trays of sweetmeats, cakes, and creams. The fair creatures then sat down on a row of chairs placed round the walls, and each making a table of her knees, began eating her sweet, but sad and sulky repast. The effect was extremely comic; their gala dresses and the decorated room forming a contrast the most unaccountable with their uncomfortable and forlorn condition.
The setup for dinner was quite unusual, but very typical of the area. The men enjoyed a lavish feast in another large room of the hotel, while the poor women were given a plate each to hold as they quietly walked around the ballroom during the men’s absence. Soon after, waiters brought out trays filled with sweets, cakes, and creams. The ladies then took their seats on a row of chairs lined against the walls, using their laps as tables, and started to eat their treats, although they looked sad and miserable. The scene was incredibly funny; their fancy dresses and the decorated room contrasted sharply with their awkward and unhappy situation.
This arrangement was owing neither to economy nor want of a room large enough to accommodate the whole party, but purely because the gentlemen liked it better. This was the answer given me, when my curiosity tempted me to ask why the ladies and gentlemen did not sup together; and this was the answer repeated to me afterwards by a variety of people to whom I put the same question.
This setup wasn’t due to budget constraints or a lack of space big enough for everyone, but simply because the guys preferred it that way. That’s what I was told when I got curious and asked why the ladies and gentlemen didn’t have dinner together; and that was the same response I got later from several others I asked the same question.
I am led to mention this feature of American manners very frequently, not only because it constantly recurs, but because I consider it as being in a great degree the cause of that universal deficiency in good manners and graceful demeanour, both in men and women, which is so remarkable.
I often feel the need to point out this aspect of American behavior, not only because it keeps showing up, but also because I believe it significantly contributes to the widespread lack of good manners and graceful behavior in both men and women, which is quite striking.
Where there is no court, which every where else is the glass wherein the higher orders dress themselves, and which again reflected from them to the classes below, goes far towards polishing, in some degree, a great majority of the population, it is not to be expected that manner should be made so much a study, or should attain an equal degree of elegance; but the deficiency, and the total difference, is greater than this cause alone could account for. The hours of enjoyment are important to human beings every where, and we every where find them preparing to make the most of them. Those who enjoy themselves only in society, whether intellectual or convivial, prepare themselves for it, and such make but a poor figure when forced to be content with the sweets of solitude: while, on the other hand, those to whom retirement affords the greatest pleasure, seldom give or receive much in society. Wherever the highest enjoyment is found by both sexes in scenes where they meet each other, both will prepare themselves to appear with advantage there. The men will not indulge in the luxury of chewing tobacco, or even of spitting, and the women will contrive to be capable of holding a higher post than that of unwearied tea-makers.
Where there’s no court, which everywhere else serves as the mirror where the upper classes present themselves and which reflects back to the lower classes, polishing a significant portion of the population to some degree, it’s not surprising that manners aren’t as much of a focus or as refined; however, the lack and the overall difference are more pronounced than this reason alone can explain. Enjoyment is important to people everywhere, and we consistently see them trying to make the most of it. Those who find joy only in social settings, whether intellectual or festive, prepare themselves for those interactions, and they struggle when they have to settle for the pleasures of solitude. On the flip side, those who take the greatest pleasure in solitude often don’t engage much in social situations. Wherever both men and women find their greatest enjoyment in gatherings, they’ll make an effort to present themselves well. Men won’t indulge in chewing tobacco or spitting, and women will make an effort to take on roles beyond just being tireless tea-makers.
In America, with the exception of dancing, which is almost wholly confined to the unmarried of both sexes, all the enjoyments of the men are found in the absence of the women. They dine, they play cards, they have musical meetings, they have suppers, all in large parties but all without women. Were it not that such is the custom, it is impossible but that they would have ingenuity enough to find some expedient for sparing the wives and daughters of the opulent the sordid offices of household drudgery which they almost all perform in their families. Even in the slave states, though they may not clear-starch and iron, mix puddings and cakes one half of the day, and watch them baking the other half, still the very highest occupy themselves in their household concerns, in a manner that precludes the possibility of their becoming elegant and enlightened companions. In Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York, I met with some exceptions to this; but speaking of the country generally, it is unquestionably true.
In America, except for dancing, which is mainly for singles of both genders, men’s enjoyment often happens in the absence of women. They have dinners, play cards, hold musical gatherings, and enjoy late-night snacks, all in large groups but without women. If it weren’t for tradition, they would certainly come up with a way to spare the wealthy wives and daughters from the tedious chores they usually do at home. Even in slave states, although they might not spend their time starching and ironing or mixing and watching cakes bake, the highest class still handles household tasks in a way that prevents them from being sophisticated and well-rounded companions. In cities like Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York, I found a few exceptions to this, but when talking about the country as a whole, it’s undoubtedly true.
Had I not become heartily tired of my prolonged residence in a place I cordially disliked, and which moreover I began to fear would not be attended with the favourable results we had anticipated, I should have found an almost inexhaustible source of amusement in the notions and opinions of the people I conversed with; and as it was, I often did enjoy this in a considerable degree.
Had I not grown completely tired of my long stay in a place I really disliked, and where I also started to worry wouldn’t bring the positive outcomes we had expected, I would have found nearly endless amusement in the ideas and opinions of the people I talked to; and as it was, I often did enjoy this quite a bit.
We received, as I have mentioned, much personal kindness; but this by no means interfered with the national feeling of, I believe, unconquerable dislike, which evidently lives at the bottom of every truly American heart against the English. This shows itself in a thousand little ways, even in the midst of the most kind and friendly intercourse, but often in a manner more comic than offensive.
We experienced a lot of personal kindness, as I mentioned before; however, this did not change the strong sense of, I believe, unshakeable dislike that clearly exists deep down in every truly American heart toward the English. This sentiment comes out in countless small ways, even during the most kind and friendly interactions, often showing itself in a way that's more humorous than hurtful.
Sometimes it was thus.—“Well, now, I think your government must just be fit to hang themselves for that last war they cooked up; it has been the ruin of you I expect, for it has just been the making of us.”
Sometimes it was like this.—“Well, now, I think your government must really be ready to hang themselves for that last war they started; I expect it has ruined you, because it has just been great for us.”
Then.—“Well, I do begin to understand your broken English better than I did; but no wonder I could not make it out very well at first, as you come from London; for every body knows that London slang is the most dreadful in the world. How queer it is now, that all the people that live in London should put the h where it is not, and never will put it where it is.”
Then.—“Well, I do start to understand your broken English better than I did before; but it’s no surprise I couldn’t understand it very well at first since you’re from London; everyone knows that London slang is the worst in the world. It’s funny how all the people who live in London put the h where it doesn’t belong and never put it where it should be.”
I was egotistical enough to ask the lady who said this, if she found that I did so.
I was self-centered enough to ask the woman who said this if she thought I did.
“No; you do not,” was the reply; but she added, with a complacent smile, “it is easy enough to see the pains you take about it: I expect you have heard how we Americans laugh at you all for it, and so you are trying to learn our way of pronouncing.”
“No; you don’t,” was the reply; but she added, with a satisfied smile, “it’s pretty obvious how much effort you’re putting into it: I assume you’ve heard how we Americans laugh at you all for it, so you’re trying to learn our way of pronouncing.”
One lady asked me very gravely, if we had left home in order to get rid of the vermin with which the English of all ranks were afflicted? “I have heard from unquestionable authority,” she added, “that it is quite impossible to walk through the streets of London without having the head filled.”
One lady asked me very seriously if we had left home to escape the pests that the English of all classes were dealing with. “I’ve heard from reliable sources,” she added, “that it’s nearly impossible to walk through the streets of London without getting your head filled.”
I laughed a little, but spoke not a word. She coloured highly, and said, “There is nothing so easy as to laugh, but truth is truth, laughed at or not.”
I chuckled a bit, but didn’t say a word. She blushed deeply and said, “There’s nothing easier than laughing, but truth is truth, whether it’s laughed at or not.”
I must preface the following anecdote by observing that in America nearly the whole of the insect tribe are classed under the general name of bug; the unfortunate cosmopolite known by that name amongst us is almost the only one not included in this term. A lady abruptly addressed me with, “Don’t you hate chintzes, Mrs. Trollope?”
I should start this story by noting that in America, almost all insects are grouped under the general name "bug"; the unfortunate creature officially known by that name here is pretty much the only one not included in this label. A lady suddenly said to me, “Don’t you hate chintzes, Mrs. Trollope?”
“No indeed,” I replied, “I think them very pretty.”
“No way,” I replied, “I think they’re really pretty.”
“There now! if that is not being English! I reckon you call that loving your country; well, thank God! we Americans have something better to love our country for than that comes to; we are not obliged to say that we like nasty filthy chintzes to shew that we are good patriots.”
“There! If that’s not being English! I guess you call that loving your country; well, thank God! We Americans have something better to love our country for than that. We don’t have to pretend we like awful, dirty fabrics to prove that we are good patriots.”
“Chintzes? what are chintzes?”
"Chintzes? What are those?"
“Possible! do you pretend you don’t know what chintzes are? Why the nasty little stinking blood-suckers that all the beds in London are full of.”
“Really! Are you pretending you don’t know what chintzes are? They’re those nasty little blood-suckers that infest all the beds in London.”
I have since been informed that chinche is Spanish for bug; but at the time the word suggested only the material of a curtain.
I’ve since learned that chinche is Spanish for bug; but at the time, the word only made me think of the fabric of a curtain.
Among other instances of that species of modesty so often seen in America, and so unknown to us, I frequently witnessed one, which, while it evinced the delicacy of the ladies, gave opportunity for many lively sallies from the gentlemen. I saw the same sort of thing repeated on different occasions at least a dozen times; e.g. a young lady is employed in making a shirt, (which it would be a symptom of absolute depravity to name), a gentleman enters, and presently begins the sprightly dialogue with “What are you making Miss Clarissa?”
Among other examples of that kind of modesty that's common in America but unfamiliar to us, I often saw one that, while showing the sensitivity of the ladies, sparked many playful exchanges from the gentlemen. I observed this same situation on various occasions at least a dozen times; for example, a young lady is busy making a shirt (which would be totally inappropriate to mention), a gentleman walks in, and soon starts a lively conversation with, “What are you making, Miss Clarissa?”
“Only a frock for my sister’s doll, sir.”
“Just a dress for my sister’s doll, sir.”
“A frock? not possible. Don’t I see that it is not a frock? Come, Miss Clarissa, what is it?”
“A dress? That’s not possible. Don’t I see that it’s not a dress? Come on, Miss Clarissa, what is it?”
“Tis just an apron for one of our Negroes, Mr. Smith.”
“It's just an apron for one of our workers, Mr. Smith.”
“How can you. Miss Clarissa! why is not the two side joined together? I expect you were better tell me what it is.”
“How can you, Miss Clarissa! Why aren’t the two sides joined together? I expect you to tell me what it is.”
“My! why then Mr. Smith, it is just a pillow-case.”
“My! Well then, Mr. Smith, it’s just a pillowcase.”
“Now that passes. Miss Clarissa! ’Tis a pillow-case for a giant then. Shall I guess, Miss?”
“Now that's something, Miss Clarissa! Is it a pillowcase for a giant then? Can I take a guess, Miss?”
“Quit, Mr. Smith; behave yourself, or I’ll certainly be affronted.”
“Stop it, Mr. Smith; act properly, or I’ll definitely be offended.”
Before the conversation arrives at this point, both gentleman and lady are in convulsions of laughter. I once saw a young lady so hard driven by a wit, that to prove she was making a bag, and nothing but a bag, she sewed up the ends before his eyes, shewing it triumphantly, and exclaiming, “there now! what can you say to that?”
Before the conversation gets to this point, both the man and the woman are in fits of laughter. I once saw a young woman so pushed to her limits by a joke that, to prove she was making just a bag, she sewed up the ends right in front of him, showing it off proudly and exclaiming, “There! What can you say to that?”
One of my friends startled me one day by saying in an affectionate, but rather compassionate tone, “How will you bear to go back to England to live, and to bring up your children in a country where you know you are considered as no better than the dirt in the streets?”
One of my friends surprised me one day by saying in a loving, but somewhat sympathetic tone, “How will you be able to go back to England to live and raise your kids in a country where you know you’re seen as no better than the dirt in the streets?”
I begged she would explain.
I begged her to explain.
“Why, you know I would not affront you for any thing; but the fact is, we Americans know rather more than you think for, and certainly if I was in England I should not think of associating with anything but lords. I have always been among the first here, and if I travelled I should like to do the same. I don’t mean, I’m sure, that I would not come to see you, but you know you are not lords, and therefore I know very well how you are treated in your own country.”
“Honestly, I would never disrespect you for anything; but the truth is, we Americans know more than you realize, and if I were in England, I wouldn't think of mingling with anyone but lords. I've always been among the elite here, and if I traveled, I'd want to do the same. I don’t mean to say that I wouldn’t come to visit you, but you know that you’re not lords, and because of that, I’m fully aware of how you’re treated in your own country.”
I very rarely contradicted statements of this kind, as I found it less trouble, and infinitely more amusing, to let them pass; indeed, had I done otherwise, it would have been of little avail, as among the many conversations I held in America respecting my own country, I do not recollect a single instance in which it was not clear that I knew much less about it than those I conversed with.
I rarely challenged statements like this because I thought it was easier and way more entertaining to just let them slide; in fact, if I had done the opposite, it wouldn’t have really mattered, since in all the conversations I had in America about my own country, I can’t remember a single time when it wasn’t obvious that I knew way less about it than the people I was talking to.
On the subject of national glory, I presume I got more than my share of buffeting; for being a woman, there was no objection to their speaking out. One lady, indeed, who was a great patriot, evinced much delicacy towards me, for upon some one speaking of New Orleans, she interrupted them, saying, “I wish you would not talk of New Orleans;” and, turning to me, added with great gentleness, “It must be so painful to your feelings to hear that place mentioned!”
On the topic of national pride, I suppose I experienced more than my fair share of criticism; since I was a woman, no one held back from expressing their opinions. One woman, who was very patriotic, showed me a lot of sensitivity. When someone started talking about New Orleans, she interrupted and said, “I wish you wouldn’t talk about New Orleans;” then, turning to me, she added gently, “It must be so painful for you to hear that place mentioned!”
The immense superiority of the American to the British navy was a constant theme, and to this I always listened, as nearly as possible, in silence. I repeatedly heard it stated, (so often, indeed, and from such various quarters, that I think there must be some truth in it), that the American sailors fire with a certainty of slaughter, whereas our shots are sent very nearly at random. “This, “ said a naval officer of high reputation, “is the blessed effect of your game laws; your sailors never fire at a mark; whilst our free tars, from their practice in pursuit of game, can any of them split a hair.” But the favourite, the constant, the universal sneer that met me every where, was on our old-fashioned attachments to things obsolete. Had they a little wit among them, I am certain they would have given us the cognomen of “My Grandmother, the British,” for that is the tone they take, and it is thus they reconcile themselves to the crude newness of every thing around them.
The huge superiority of the American navy over the British one was a common topic, and I tried to listen to it mostly in silence. I heard it claimed so often, from so many different people, that I believe there must be some truth to it—that American sailors hit their targets with deadly accuracy, while our shots are fired almost at random. “This,” said a well-respected naval officer, “is the wonderful result of your game laws; your sailors never aim at anything specific; while our free sailors, thanks to their experience in hunting, can split a hair with their shots.” But the favorite, constant, and universal jab I faced everywhere was about our old-fashioned attachments to outdated things. If they had even a little wit, I’m sure they would have dubbed us “My Grandmother, the British,” because that’s the attitude they have, and it’s how they justify the clumsy newness of everything around them.
“I wonder you are not sick of kings, chancellors, and archbishops, and all your fustian of wigs and gowns,” said a very clever gentleman to me once, with an affected yawn, “I protest the very sound almost sets me to sleep.”
“I wonder how you’re not tired of kings, chancellors, and archbishops, and all your fancy wigs and gowns,” said a very clever guy to me once, with a fake yawn, “I swear the very sound almost puts me to sleep.”
It is amusing to observe how soothing the idea seems, that they are more modern, more advanced than England. Our classic literature, our princely dignities, our noble institutions, are all gone-by relics of the dark ages.
It’s funny to see how comforting the idea is that they are more modern and advanced than England. Our classic literature, our royal dignities, our noble institutions, are all just outdated remnants of the dark ages.
This, and the vastness of their naked territory, make up the flattering unction which is laid upon the soul, as an antidote to the little misgiving which from time to time arises, lest their large country be not of quite so much importance among the nations, as a certain paltry old-fashioned little place that they wot of.
This, along with the expansiveness of their bare land, serves as a comforting balm for the soul, acting as a remedy for the occasional doubt that creeps in, questioning whether their extensive country holds as much significance among nations as a certain insignificant, outdated little place they are familiar with.
I was once sitting with a party of ladies, among whom were one or two young girls, whose curiosity was greater than their patriotism, and they asked me many questions respecting the splendour and extent of London. I was endeavouring to satisfy them by the best description I could give, when we were interrupted by another lady, who exclaimed, “Do hold your tongues, girls, about London; if you want to know what a beautiful city is, look at Philadelphia; when Mrs. Trollope has been there, I think she will allow that it is better worth talking about than that great overgrown collection of nasty, filthy, dirty streets, that they call London.”
I was once sitting with a group of women, including one or two young girls, whose curiosity was stronger than their sense of patriotism. They asked me a lot of questions about the beauty and size of London. I was trying to answer them as best as I could when we were interrupted by another woman, who exclaimed, “Can you please be quiet, girls, about London? If you want to know what a real beautiful city is, look at Philadelphia; when Mrs. Trollope visits, I think she’ll agree that it’s way more worth talking about than that huge, messy collection of nasty, filthy, dirty streets they call London.”
Once in Ohio, and once in the district of Columbia, I had an atlas displayed before me, that I might be convinced by the evidence of my own eyes what a very contemptible little country I came from. I shall never forget the gravity with which, on the latter occasion, a gentleman drew out his graduated pencil-case, and shewed me past contradiction, that the whole of the British dominions did not equal in size one of their least important states; nor the air with which, after the demonstration, he placed his feet upon the chimney-piece, considerably higher than his head, and whistled Yankee Doodle.
Once in Ohio, and once in Washington, D.C., I had an atlas put in front of me so I could see for myself just how insignificant the little country I came from really was. I’ll never forget how serious a guy was on that second occasion when he pulled out his ruler and showed me, beyond any doubt, that the entire British Empire didn’t even match the size of one of their least important states. Then, with a smug look, he put his feet up on the mantelpiece, which was way higher than his head, and whistled "Yankee Doodle."
Their glorious institutions, their unequalled freedom, were, of course, not left unsung.
Their amazing institutions and unmatched freedom were, of course, celebrated.
I took some pains to ascertain what they meant by their glorious institutions, and it is with no affectation of ignorance that I profess I never could comprehend the meaning of the phrase, which is, however, on the lip of every American, when he talks of his country. I asked if by their institutions they meant their hospitals and penitentiaries. “Oh no! we mean the glorious institutions which are coeval with the revolution.” “Is it,” I asked, “your institution of marriage, which you have made purely a civil and not a religious rite, to be performed by a justice of peace, instead of a clergyman?”
I made an effort to understand what they meant by their great institutions, and it's not out of any false ignorance that I admit I could never grasp the meaning of that phrase, which seems to be on the lips of every American when they talk about their country. I asked if by their institutions they were referring to hospitals and prisons. “Oh no! We mean the great institutions that have existed since the revolution.” “Is it,” I inquired, “your institution of marriage, which you have made purely a civil matter and not a religious one, performed by a justice of the peace instead of a clergyman?”
“Oh no! we speak of our divine political institutions.” Yet still I was in the dark, nor can I guess what they mean, unless they call incessant electioneering, without pause or interval for a single day, for a single hour, of their whole existence, “a glorious institution.”
“Oh no! We’re talking about our amazing political systems.” Even so, I was still confused, and I can’t figure out what they mean, unless they refer to constant campaigning, without a break or pause for even a day or an hour of their entire existence, as “a glorious system.”
Their unequalled freedom, I think, I understand better. Their code of common law is built upon ours; and the difference between us is this, in England the laws are acted upon, in America they are not.
Their unmatched freedom, I think I understand better now. Their common law system is based on ours; the difference between us is that in England the laws are enforced, while in America they are not.
I do not speak of the police of the Atlantic cities; I believe it is well arranged: in New York it is celebrated for being so; but out of the range of their influence, the contempt of law is greater than I can venture to state, with any hope of being believed. Trespass, assault, robbery, nay, even murder, are often committed without the slightest attempt at legal interference.
I’m not talking about the police in the Atlantic cities; I think they are well organized. In New York, they are known for being effective. But outside their influence, the disregard for the law is worse than I can reasonably expect anyone to believe. Trespassing, assault, robbery, and even murder happen frequently without any effort at legal intervention.
During the summer that we passed most delightfully in Maryland, our rambles were often restrained in various directions by the advice of our kind friends, who knew the manners and morals of the country. When we asked the cause, we were told, “There is a public-house on that road, and it will not be safe to pass it,”
During the summer we enjoyed so much in Maryland, our explorations were often limited in different directions by the suggestions of our friendly companions, who were familiar with the local customs and behaviors. When we inquired about the reason, we were told, “There’s a bar on that road, and it won’t be safe to go by it,”
The line of the Chesapeak and Ohio canal passed within a few miles of Mrs. S—’s residence. It twice happened during our stay with her, that dead bodies were found partially concealed near it. The circumstance was related as a sort of half hour’s wonder; and when I asked particulars of those who, on one occasion, brought the tale, the reply was, “Oh, he was murdered I expect; or maybe he died of the canal fever; but they say he had marks of being throttled.” No inquest was summoned; and certainly no more sensation was produced by the occurrence than if a sheep had been found in the same predicament.
The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal ran just a few miles from Mrs. S—’s home. During our visit with her, two dead bodies were discovered partially hidden nearby. People talked about it as a kind of curiosity for about half an hour, and when I asked for more details from those who shared the story, the response was, “Oh, he was probably murdered; or maybe he died from canal fever; but they say he showed signs of being strangled.” No inquest was held, and honestly, the incident caused no more fuss than if a sheep had been found in the same situation.
The abundance of food and the scarcity of hanging were also favourite topics, as proving their superiority to England. They are both excellent things, but I do not admit the inference. A wide and most fertile territory, as yet but thinly inhabited, may easily be made to yield abundant food for its population: and where a desperate villain knows, that when he has made his town or his village “too hot to hold him,” he has nothing to do but to travel a few miles west, and be sure of finding plenty of beef and whiskey, with no danger that the law shall follow him, it is not extraordinary that executions should be rare.
The abundance of food and the lack of hanging were also popular topics, as they demonstrated their superiority over England. Both are great things, but I don't agree with the conclusion. A large and fertile area, still sparsely populated, can easily produce enough food for its residents. And when a desperate criminal knows that if he makes his town or village "too hot to handle," all he has to do is travel a few miles west to find plenty of beef and whiskey, without the risk of being pursued by the law, it's not surprising that executions are rare.
Once during our residence at Cincinnati, a murderer of uncommon atrocity was taken, tried, convicted, and condemned to death. It had been shewn on his trial, that some years before he had murdered a wife and child at New Orleans, but little notice had been taken of it at the time. The crime which had now thrown him into the hands of justice was the recent murder of a second wife, and the chief evidence against him was his own son.
Once while we were living in Cincinnati, a particularly brutal murderer was caught, tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. It was revealed during his trial that several years earlier, he had killed a wife and child in New Orleans, but it hadn’t received much attention back then. The crime that landed him in the justice system now was the recent murder of a second wife, and the main evidence against him came from his own son.
The day of his execution was fixed, and the sensation produced was so great from the strangeness of the occurrence, (no white man having ever been executed at Cincinnati,) that persons from sixty miles’ distance came to be present at it.
The day of his execution was set, and the buzz it created was so intense because this was such an unusual event (no white man had ever been executed in Cincinnati) that people traveled from sixty miles away to witness it.
Meanwhile some unco’ good people began to start doubts as to the righteousness of hanging a man, and made application to the Governor of the State[6] of Ohio, to commute the sentence into imprisonment. The Governor for some time refused to interfere with the sentence of the tribunal before which he had been tried; but at length, frightened at the unusual situation in which he found himself, he yielded to the importunity of the Presbyterian party who had assailed him, and sent off an order to the sheriff accordingly. But this order was not to reprieve him, but to ask him if he pleased to be reprieved, and sent to the penitentiary instead of being hanged.
Meanwhile, some overly good people began to doubt the righteousness of hanging a man and applied to the Governor of the State[6] of Ohio to change the sentence to imprisonment. The Governor initially refused to interfere with the sentence from the court that had tried him, but eventually, feeling uneasy about the unusual situation he found himself in, he gave in to the pressure from the Presbyterian group who had confronted him and sent an order to the sheriff. However, this order wasn’t to grant a reprieve; it was simply to ask if he would prefer to be spared from hanging and be sent to prison instead.
[6] The Governors of states have the same power over life and death as is vested, with us, in the Crown.
[6] The governors of states have the same authority over life and death as is held, by us, in the Crown.
The sheriff waited upon the criminal, and made his proposal, and was answered. “If any thing could make me agree to it, it would be the hope of living long enough to kill you and my dog of a son: however, I won’t agree; you shall have the hanging of me.”
The sheriff confronted the criminal and made his proposal, to which he received a response. “If anything could make me agree to it, it would be the hope of living long enough to kill you and my worthless son; however, I won't agree; you'll have to hang me.”
The worthy sheriff, to whom the ghastly office of executioner is assigned, said all in his power to persuade him to sign the offered document, but in vain; he obtained nothing but abuse for his efforts.
The respectable sheriff, who was given the grim job of executioner, did everything he could to convince him to sign the proposed document, but it was all for nothing; he received nothing but insults for his efforts.
The day of execution arrived; the place appointed was the side of a hill, the only one cleared of trees near the town; and many hours before the time fixed, we saw it entirely covered by an immense multitude of men, women, and children. At length the hour arrived, the dismal cart was seen slowly mounting the hill, the noisy throng was hushed into solemn silence; the wretched criminal mounted the scaffold, when again the sheriff asked him to sign his acceptance of the commutation proposed; but he spurned the paper from him, and cried aloud, “Hang me!”
The day of the execution came; the designated spot was on the side of a hill, the only cleared area near the town; and many hours before the scheduled time, we noticed it completely filled with a massive crowd of men, women, and children. Finally, the hour arrived, and the grim cart was seen slowly making its way up the hill. The noisy crowd fell into a heavy silence; the condemned man climbed onto the scaffold, and once more the sheriff asked him to sign the paper accepting the proposed commutation, but he pushed the document away and shouted, “Hang me!”
Midday was the moment appointed for cutting the rope; the sheriff stood, his watch in one hand, and a knife in the other; the hand was lifted to strike, when the criminal stoutly exclaimed, “I sign;” and he was conveyed back to prison, amidst the shouts, laughter, and ribaldry of the mob.
Midday was the time set for cutting the rope; the sheriff stood with his watch in one hand and a knife in the other. Just as he was about to bring the blade down, the criminal boldly shouted, “I sign;” and he was taken back to prison amid the jeers, laughter, and mockery of the crowd.
I am not fond of hanging, but there was something in all this that did not look like the decent dignity of wholesome justice.
I’m not a fan of hanging, but there was something about all this that didn’t feel like the respectable dignity of true justice.
CHAPTER XV
Camp-Meeting
Camp Meeting
It was in the course of this summer that I found the opportunity I had long wished for, of attending a camp-meeting, and I gladly accepted the invitation of an English lady and gentleman to accompany them in their carriage to the spot where it is held; this was in a wild district on the confines of Indiana.
It was during this summer that I finally got the chance I had been hoping for to attend a camp meeting, and I happily accepted the invitation from an English couple to join them in their carriage to the location where it takes place; this was in a remote area on the border of Indiana.
The prospect of passing a night in the back woods of Indiana was by no means agreeable, but I screwed my courage to the proper pitch, and set forth determined to see with my own eyes, and hear with my own ears, what a camp-meeting really was. I had heard it said that being at a camp-meeting was like standing at the gate of heaven, and seeing it opening before you; I had heard it said, that being at a camp-meeting was like finding yourself within the gates of hell; in either case there must be something to gratify curiosity, and compensate one for the fatigue of a long rumbling ride and a sleepless night.
The idea of spending a night in the Indiana woods wasn't exactly appealing, but I gathered my courage and set out, determined to see and hear for myself what a camp meeting was all about. I had heard people say that being at a camp meeting felt like standing at the gates of heaven, watching them open; others claimed it felt like being trapped inside the gates of hell. In either scenario, there had to be something to satisfy my curiosity and make up for the exhaustion of a long, bumpy ride and a sleepless night.
We reached the ground about an hour before midnight, and the approach to it was highly picturesque. The spot chosen was the verge of an unbroken forest, where a space of about twenty acres appeared to have been partially cleared for the purpose. Tents of different sizes were pitched very near together in a circle round the cleared space; behind them were ranged an exterior circle of carriages of every description, and at the back of each were fastened the horses which had drawn them thither. Through this triple circle of defence we distinguished numerous fires burning brightly within it; and still more numerous lights flickering from the trees that were left in the enclosure. The moon was in meridian splendour above our heads.
We arrived on the ground about an hour before midnight, and the way there was really beautiful. The chosen spot was on the edge of an unbroken forest, where about twenty acres seemed to have been partially cleared for this purpose. Tents of various sizes were set up close together in a circle around the cleared area; behind them was an outer circle of carriages of all kinds, and tied to the back of each were the horses that had brought them there. Through this threefold circle of protection, we could see numerous fires burning brightly inside; and even more lights flickering from the trees that remained in the cleared space. The moon was shining brilliantly above us.
We left the carriage to the care of a servant, who was to prepare a bed in it for Mrs. B. and me, and entered the inner circle. The first glance reminded me of Vauxhall, from the effect of the lights among the trees, and the moving crowd below them; but the second shewed a scene totally unlike any thing I had ever witnessed. Four high frames, constructed in the form of altars, were placed at the four corners of the enclosure; on these were supported layers of earth and sod, on which burned immense fires of blazing pinewood. On one side a rude platform was erected to accommodate the preachers, fifteen of whom attended this meeting, and with very short intervals for necessary refreshment and private devotion, preached in rotation, day and night, from Tuesday to Saturday.
We left the carriage with a servant who was going to set up a bed in it for Mrs. B. and me, and we entered the inner circle. The first glance reminded me of Vauxhall, with the lights glowing among the trees and the moving crowd below; but the second revealed a scene completely different from anything I had ever seen before. Four tall frames, designed like altars, were positioned at each corner of the enclosure; on these, layers of earth and sod supported massive fires of blazing pinewood. On one side, a makeshift platform was built for the preachers, fifteen of whom attended this meeting, preaching in rotation day and night from Tuesday to Saturday with only brief breaks for necessary refreshment and personal prayer.
When we arrived, the preachers were silent; but we heard issuing from nearly every tent mingled sounds of praying, preaching, singing, and lamentation. The curtains in front of each tent were dropped, and the faint light that gleamed through the white drapery, backed as it was by the dark forest, had a beautiful and mysterious effect, that set the imagination at work; and had the sounds which vibrated around us been less discordant, harsh, and unnatural, I should have enjoyed it; but listening at the corner of a tent, which poured forth more than its proportion of clamour, in a few moments chased every feeling derived from imagination, and furnished realities that could neither be mistaken or forgotten.
When we got there, the preachers were quiet; but we could hear a mix of praying, preaching, singing, and crying coming from almost every tent. The curtains in front of each tent were closed, and the soft light that shone through the white fabric, set against the dark forest, created a beautiful and mysterious atmosphere that sparked our imagination. If the sounds around us hadn’t been so jarring, harsh, and unnatural, I would have enjoyed it; but standing at the corner of a tent that was louder than the rest quickly wiped away any feelings of imagination and replaced them with realities that were impossible to ignore or forget.
Great numbers of persons were walking about the ground, who appeared like ourselves to be present only as spectators; some of these very unceremoniously contrived to raise the drapery of this tent, at one comer, so as to afford us a perfect view of the interior.
A large crowd of people was walking around the area, looking just like us as they were there only to watch; a few of them, quite casually, managed to lift the fabric of this tent at one corner, giving us a clear view of the inside.
The floor was covered with straw, which round the sides was heaped in masses, that might serve as seats, but which at that moment were used to support the heads and the arms of the close-packed circle of men and women who kneeled on the floor.
The floor was covered with straw, which was piled high around the edges, creating makeshift seats. However, at that moment, they were being used to support the heads and arms of the tightly packed circle of men and women kneeling on the floor.
Out of about thirty persons thus placed, perhaps half a dozen were men. One of these, a handsome looking youth of eighteen or twenty, kneeled just below the opening through which I looked. His arm was encircling the neck of a young girl who knelt beside him, with her hair hanging dishevelled upon her shoulders, and her features working with the most violent agitation; soon after they both fell forward on the straw, as if unable to endure in any other attitude the burning eloquence of a tall grim figure in black, who, standing erect in the centre, was uttering with incredible vehemence an oration that seemed to hover between praying and preaching; his arms hung stiff and immoveable by his side, and he looked like an ill-constructed machine, set in action by a movement so violent, as to threaten its own destruction, so jerkingly, painfully, yet rapidly, did his words tumble out; the kneeling circle ceasing not to call in every variety of tone on the name of Jesus; accompanied with sobs, groans, and a sort of low howling inexpressibly painful to listen to. But my attention was speedily withdrawn from the preacher, and the circle round him, by a figure which knelt alone at some distance; it was a living image of Scott’s Macbriar, as young, as wild, and as terrible. His thin arms tossed above his head, had forced themselves so far out of the sleeves, that they were bare to the elbow; his large eyes glared frightfully, and he continued to scream without an instant’s intermission the word “Glory!” with a violence that seemed to swell every vein to bursting. It was too dreadful to look upon long, and we turned away shuddering.
Out of about thirty people there, maybe half a dozen were men. One of them, a handsome young guy around eighteen or twenty, knelt just below the opening where I was looking. His arm was wrapped around the neck of a young girl kneeling next to him, her hair falling messily over her shoulders and her face showing intense emotion; soon after, they both collapsed onto the straw, as if unable to endure any other position while listening to the passionate speech of a tall, grim figure in black who stood upright in the center, delivering an oration that seemed to blend prayer and preaching; his arms hung rigid and motionless at his sides, and he looked like a poorly made machine, powered by a force so intense that it threatened to break down, with his words tumbling out in a jerky, painful, yet rapid manner; the kneeling crowd continued to call on the name of Jesus in various tones, mixed with sobs, groans, and a sort of low howling that was incredibly painful to hear. But my attention was quickly drawn away from the preacher and the crowd around him by a figure that knelt alone at a distance; it was a living image of Scott’s Macbriar, as young, wild, and terrifying. His thin arms were raised above his head, pushed so far out of his sleeves that they were bare to the elbow; his large eyes glared in a frightening way, and he kept screaming the word “Glory!” with such force that it seemed to swell every vein to the verge of bursting. It was too horrifying to look at for long, and we turned away, shuddering.
We made the circuit of the tents, pausing where attention was particularly excited by sounds more vehement than ordinary. We contrived to look into many; all were strewed with straw, and the distorted figures that we saw kneeling, sitting, and lying amongst it, joined to the woeful and convulsive cries, gave to each, the air of a cell in Bedlam.
We walked around the tents, stopping where the noise was louder than usual. We managed to peek into many of them; they were all covered in straw, and the twisted figures we saw kneeling, sitting, and lying among it, along with their sad and frantic cries, made each one feel like a room in a mental institution.
One tent was occupied exclusively by Negroes. They were all full-dressed, and looked exactly as if they were performing a scene on the stage. One woman wore a dress of pink gauze trimmed with silver lace; another was dressed in pale yellow silk; one or two had splendid turbans; and all wore a profusion of ornaments. The men were in snow white pantaloons, with gay coloured linen jackets. One of these, a youth of coal-black comeliness, was preaching with the most violent gesticulations, frequently springing high from the ground, and clapping his hands over his head. Could our missionary societies have heard the trash he uttered, by way of an address to the Deity, they might perhaps have doubted whether his conversion had much enlightened his mind.
One tent was exclusively occupied by Black people. They were all dressed up and looked exactly like they were performing on stage. One woman wore a pink gauze dress trimmed with silver lace; another was in pale yellow silk; one or two had stunning turbans; and all wore lots of jewelry. The men were in bright white pantaloons with colorful linen jackets. One of them, a young man with striking dark features, was preaching with intense gestures, often jumping high off the ground and clapping his hands above his head. If our missionary societies could have heard the nonsense he was saying as a prayer to God, they might have doubted whether his conversion had really enlightened him.
At midnight a horn sounded through the camp, which, we were told, was to call the people from private to public worship; and we presently saw them flocking from all sides to the front of the preachers’ stand. Mrs. B. and I contrived to place ourselves with our backs supported against the lower part of this structure, and we were thus enabled to witness the scene which followed without personal danger. There were about two thousand persons assembled.
At midnight, a horn blew through the camp, which we were told was meant to gather people from private to public worship; soon we saw them coming in from all directions to the front of the preachers' stand. Mrs. B. and I managed to position ourselves with our backs against the lower part of this structure, allowing us to watch the unfolding scene without any risk. About two thousand people had gathered.
One of the preachers began in a low nasal tone, and, like all other Methodist preachers, assured us of the enormous depravity of man as he comes from the hands of his Maker, and of his perfect sanctification after he had wrestled sufficiently with the Lord to get hold of him, et cetera. The admiration of the crowd was evinced by almost constant cries of “Amen! Amen!” “Jesus! Jesus!” “Glory! Glory!” and the like. But this comparative tranquility did not last long: the preacher told them that “this night was the time fixed upon for anxious sinners to wrestle with the Lord;” that he and his brethren “were at hand to help them,” and that such as needed their help were to come forward into “the pen.” The phrase forcibly recalled Milton’s lines—
One of the preachers started off in a low, nasal voice and, like all other Methodist preachers, told us about the extreme depravity of humans straight from the hands of their Creator, and about how complete sanctification comes after one has struggled enough with the Lord to grasp his presence, et cetera. The crowd showed their admiration with almost constant shouts of “Amen! Amen!” “Jesus! Jesus!” “Glory! Glory!” and similar expressions. However, this relative calm didn’t last long: the preacher announced that “tonight was the time set for anxious sinners to wrestle with the Lord;” that he and his fellow preachers “were here to assist them,” and that those who needed their guidance should come forward into “the pen.” The phrase strongly reminded me of Milton’s lines—
“Blind mouths! that scarce themselves know how to hold
A sheep-hook, or have learned aught else, the least
That to the faithful herdsman’s art belongs!
—But when they list their lean and flashy songs,
Grate on their scrannel pipes of wretched straw;—
The hungry sheep look up, and are not fed!
But swoln with wind, and the rank mist they draw,
Rot inwardly—and foul contagion spread.”
“Blind mouths! that hardly know how to hold
A shepherd's crook, or have learned anything else, the least
That belongs to the skill of a loyal herdsman!
—But when they choose to sing their thin and flashy songs,
It grates on their awful pipes made of poor straw;—
The hungry sheep look up, and aren’t fed!
But swollen with wind, and the foul mist they draw,
They rot from within—and spread a horrible infection.”
“The pen” was the space immediately below the preachers’ stand; we were therefore placed on the edge of it, and were enabled to see and hear all that took place in the very centre of this extraordinary exhibition.
“The pen” was the area right below the preachers’ stand; we were positioned on its edge, allowing us to see and hear everything happening right in the middle of this extraordinary event.
The crowd fell back at the mention of the pen, and for some minutes there was a vacant space before us. The preachers came down from their stand and placed themselves in the midst of it, beginning to sing a hymn, calling upon the penitents to come forth. As they sung they kept turning themselves round to every part of the crowd and, by degrees, the voices of the whole multitude joined in chorus. This was the only moment at which I perceived any thing like the solemn and beautiful effect, which I had heard ascribed to this woodland worship. It is certain that the combined voices of such a multitude, heard at dead of night, from the depths of their eternal forests, the many fair young faces turned upward, and looking paler and lovelier as they met the moon-beams, the dark figures of the officials in the middle of the circle, the lurid glare thrown by the altar-fires on the woods beyond, did altogether produce a fine and solemn effect, that I shall not easily forget; but ere I had well enjoyed it, the scene changed, and sublimity gave place to horror and disgust.
The crowd stepped back when the pen was mentioned, and for a few minutes, there was an empty space in front of us. The preachers came down from their platform and gathered in the middle, starting to sing a hymn and inviting the penitents to come forward. As they sang, they turned to face every part of the crowd, and gradually, the voices of the entire crowd joined in harmony. This was the only moment I felt anything like the solemn and beautiful effect that I had heard described in this woodland worship. It was clear that the combined voices of such a large group, heard in the dead of night amidst the depths of their eternal forests, the many fair young faces turned upward and growing paler and lovelier in the moonlight, the dark figures of the officials in the center of the circle, and the harsh glow from the altar fires against the woods beyond, all created an impressive and solemn atmosphere that I won't easily forget; but before I could fully appreciate it, the scene shifted, and the sense of grandeur was replaced by horror and disgust.
The exhortation nearly resembled that which I had heard at “the Revival,” but the result was very different; for, instead of the few hysterical women who had distinguished themselves on that occasion, above a hundred persons,, nearly all females, came forward, uttering howlings and groans, so terrible that I shall never cease to shudder when I recall them. They appeared to drag each other forward, and on the word being given, “let us pray,” they all fell on their knees; but this posture was soon changed for others that permitted greater scope for the convulsive movements of their limbs; and they were soon all lying on the ground in an indescribable confusion of heads and legs. They threw about their limbs with such incessant and violent motions, that I was every instant expecting some serious accident to occur.
The speech was almost like the one I had heard at “the Revival,” but the outcome was completely different; instead of just a few hysterical women that stood out that day, over a hundred people, mostly women, came forward, crying out in such agony that I’ll never forget the shivers it gave me. They seemed to pull each other closer, and when the signal was given, “let us pray,” they all dropped to their knees; but that position quickly changed to others that allowed for more extreme movements of their bodies, and soon they were all sprawled out on the ground in a chaotic mix of heads and legs. They flailed their limbs with such frantic and violent motions that I was constantly worried something serious might happen.
But how am I to describe the sounds that proceeded from this strange mass of human beings? I know no words which can convey an idea of it. Hysterical sobbings, convulsive groans, shrieks and screams the most appalling, burst forth on all sides. I felt sick with horror. As if their hoarse and over strained voices failed to make noise enough, they soon began to clap their hands violently. The scene described by Dante was before me:-
But how do I even describe the sounds coming from this strange crowd of people? I have no words that can capture it. Hysterical sobbing, convulsive groans, and the most horrifying screams erupted from all around. I felt sick with fear. As if their hoarse, strained voices weren’t loud enough, they quickly started clapping their hands violently. The scene described by Dante was right in front of me:-
“Quivi sospiri, pianti, ed alti guai
Risonavan per l’aere—
—Orribili favelle
Parole di dolore, accenti d’ira
Voci alti e fioche, e suon di man con elle.”
“Here, sighs, cries, and deep woes
Echoed through the air—
—Horrible words
Words of pain, tones of anger
Voices loud and faint, and the sound of hands with them.”
Many of these wretched creatures were beautiful young females. The preachers moved about among them, at once exciting and soothing their agonies. I heard the muttered “Sister! dear sister!” I saw the insidious lips approach the cheeks of the unhappy girls; I heard the murmured confessions of the poor victims, and I watched their tormentors, breathing into their ears consolations that tinged the pale cheek with red. Had I been a man, I am sure I should have been guilty of some rash act of interference; nor do I believe that such a scene could have been acted in the presence of Englishmen without instant punishment being inflicted; not to mention the salutary discipline of the treadmill, which, beyond all question, would, in England, have been applied to check so turbulent and so vicious a scene.
Many of these unfortunate creatures were beautiful young women. The preachers moved among them, both fueling and calming their suffering. I heard the whispered "Sister! dear sister!" I saw the deceitful lips come close to the cheeks of the distressed girls; I heard the quiet confessions of the poor victims, and I observed their tormentors leaning in to offer reassurances that flushed the pale cheeks with color. If I had been a man, I know I would have acted rashly to intervene; I also don't believe that such a scene could have unfolded in front of Englishmen without immediate consequences; not to mention the effective discipline of the treadmill, which, without a doubt, would have been used in England to curb such a chaotic and immoral situation.
After the first wild burst that followed their prostration, the meanings, in many instances, became loudly articulate; and I then experienced a strange vibration between tragic and comic feeling.
After the initial wild outburst that came after they fell to the ground, the meanings, in many cases, became clearly expressed; and I then felt a weird shift between tragic and funny emotions.
A very pretty girl, who was kneeling in the attitude of Canova’s Magdalene immediately before us, amongst an immense quantity of jargon, broke out thus: “Woe! woe to the backsliders! hear it, hear it Jesus! when I was fifteen my mother died, and I backslided, oh Jesus, I backslided! take me home to my mother, Jesus! take me home to her, for I am weary! Oh John Mitchel! John Mitchel!” and after sobbing piteously behind her raised hands, she lifted her sweet face again, which was as pale as death, and said, “Shall I sit on the sunny bank of salvation with my mother? my own dear mother? oh Jesus, take me home, take me home!” Who could refuse a tear to this earnest wish for death in one so young and so lovely? But I saw her, ere I left the ground, with her hand fast locked, and her head supported by a man who looked very much as Don Juan might, when sent back to earth as too bad for the regions below.
A very pretty girl, kneeling like Canova's Magdalene right in front of us, suddenly exclaimed amidst a lot of noise, “Woe! Woe to the backsliders! Hear it, hear it, Jesus! When I was fifteen, my mother died, and I turned away from you, oh Jesus, I turned away! Take me home to my mother, Jesus! Take me home to her, for I am weary! Oh John Mitchel! John Mitchel!” After sobbing pathetically behind her raised hands, she lifted her sweet face again, which was as pale as death, and said, “Shall I sit on the sunny bank of salvation with my mother? My own dear mother? Oh Jesus, take me home, take me home!” Who could resist shedding a tear for this heartfelt wish for death coming from someone so young and beautiful? But I saw her, before I left the ground, with her hand tightly clasped in a man's, her head resting on him, and he looked a lot like Don Juan might after being sent back to earth for being too bad for the afterlife.
One woman near us continued to “call on the Lord,” as it is termed, in the loudest possible tone, and without a moment’s interval, for the two hours that we kept our dreadful station. She became frightfully hoarse, and her face so red as to make me expect she would burst a blood-vessel. Among the rest of her rant, she said, “I will hold fast to Jesus, I never will let him go; if they take me to hell, I will still hold him fast, fast, fast!”
One woman near us kept “calling on the Lord,” as they say, in the loudest voice possible, without a break, for the entire two hours we endured our terrible position. She got dreadfully hoarse, and her face turned so red that I thought she might burst a blood vessel. Amid her shouting, she said, “I will hold on to Jesus, I will never let him go; even if they take me to hell, I will still hold on to him, hold on, hold on!”
The stunning noise was sometimes varied by the preachers beginning to sing; but the convulsive movements of the poor maniacs only became more violent. At length the atrocious wickedness of this horrible scene increased to a degree of grossness, that drove us from our station; we returned to the carriage at about three o’clock in the morning, and passed the remainder of the night in listening to the ever increasing tumult at the pen. To sleep was impossible. At daybreak the horn again sounded, to send them to private devotion; and in about an hour afterwards I saw the whole camp as joyously and eagerly employed in preparing and devouring their most substantial breakfasts as if the night had been passed in dancing; and I marked many a fair but pale face, that I recognised as a demoniac of the night, simpering beside a swain, to whom she carefully administered hot coffee and eggs. The preaching saint and the howling sinner seemed alike to relish this mode of recruiting their strength.
The loud noise was sometimes interrupted by the preachers starting to sing, but the frantic movements of the poor maniacs only became more intense. Eventually, the horrible wickedness of this scene reached such a level of grossness that it drove us away; we returned to the carriage around three o’clock in the morning and spent the rest of the night listening to the ever-increasing chaos at the pen. Sleeping was impossible. At daybreak, the horn sounded again to send them to private prayer, and about an hour later, I saw the entire camp happily and eagerly preparing and devouring their hearty breakfasts as if the night had been spent dancing. I noticed many pale but lovely faces, recognized as those who had been possessed the night before, smiling beside a young man to whom she carefully served hot coffee and eggs. Both the preaching saint and the howling sinner seemed to enjoy this way of recharging their energy.
After enjoying abundance of strong tea, which proved a delightful restorative after a night so strangely spent, I wandered alone into the forest, and I never remember to have found perfect quiet more delightful.
After enjoying plenty of strong tea, which turned out to be a wonderful pick-me-up after such a strange night, I wandered alone into the forest, and I can’t remember ever finding perfect peace more enjoyable.
We soon after left the ground; but before our departure we learnt that a very satisfactory collection had been made by the preachers, for Bibles, Tracts, and all other religious purposes.
We soon left the ground; but before we departed, we found out that a very satisfactory collection had been made by the preachers for Bibles, tracts, and all other religious purposes.
CHAPTER XVI
Danger of rural excursions—Sickness
Risk of rural trips—Illness
It is by no means easy to enjoy the beauties of American scenery in the west, even when you are in a neighbourhood that affords much to admire; at least, in doing so, you run considerable risk of injuring your health. Nothing is considered more dangerous than exposure to midday heat, except exposure to evening damp; and the twilight is so short, that if you set out on an expedition when the fervid heat subsides, you can hardly get half a mile before “sun down,” as they call it, warns you that you must run or drive home again, as fast as possible, for fear you should get “a chill.”
It’s definitely not easy to appreciate the beauty of the western American landscape, even if you’re in an area full of things to admire; at least, trying to do so puts your health at significant risk. Nothing is seen as more dangerous than being out in the midday heat, except for being out in the evening damp. The twilight is so brief that if you head out when the intense heat eases off, you can barely make it half a mile before "sun down," as they call it, signals that you need to hurry home as quickly as possible to avoid catching "a chill."
I believe we braved all this more than any one else in the whole country, and if we had not, we should have left Cincinnati without seeing any thing of the country around it.
I think we faced all of this more than anyone else in the entire country, and if we hadn't, we would have left Cincinnati without seeing anything of the surrounding area.
Though we kept steadily to our resolution of passing no more sylvan hours in the forests of Ohio, we often spent entire days in Kentucky, tracing the course of a “creek,” or climbing the highest points within our reach, in the hope of catching a glimpse of some distant object. A beautiful reach of the Ohio, or the dark windings of the pretty Licking, were indeed always the most remarkable features in the landscape.
Though we stuck to our decision of not spending any more time in the forests of Ohio, we often spent whole days in Kentucky, following the path of a “creek” or climbing to the highest points we could reach, hoping to catch a glimpse of something far away. A beautiful stretch of the Ohio or the winding dark waters of the lovely Licking were always the standout features in the landscape.
There was one spot, however, so beautiful that we visited it again and again; it was by no means free from mosquitoes; and being on the bank of a stream, with many enormous trees lying on the half-cleared ground around, it was just such a place as we had been told a hundred times was particularly “dangerous;” nevertheless, we dared every thing for the sake of dining beside our beautiful rippling stream, and watching the bright sunbeams dancing on the grassy bank, at such a distance from our retreat that they could not heat us. A little below the basin that cooled our wine was a cascade of sufficient dimensions to give us all the music of a waterfall, and all the sparkling brightness of clear water when it is broken again and again by jutting crags.
There was one spot, though, so beautiful that we kept coming back to it; it wasn't exactly free from mosquitoes, and since it was by the bank of a stream with many huge trees scattered on the partially cleared ground around it, it was just the kind of place we had been warned a hundred times was particularly “dangerous.” Still, we took every risk for the chance to eat beside our lovely, flowing stream, watching the bright sun rays dancing on the grassy bank, far enough from our spot that they couldn’t heat us up. A little below the basin that chilled our wine, there was a cascade large enough to provide us with the soothing sound of a waterfall and all the sparkling clarity of water as it splashed repeatedly over the jutting rocks.
To sit beside this miniature cascade, and read, or dream away a day, was one of our greatest pleasures.
To sit next to this small waterfall and read or spend a day dreaming was one of our greatest pleasures.
It was indeed a mortifying fact, that whenever we found out a picturesque nook, where turf, and moss, and deep shade, and a crystal stream, and fallen trees, majestic in their ruin, tempted us to sit down, and be very cool and very happy, we invariably found that that spot lay under the imputation of malaria.
It was truly embarrassing to realize that every time we discovered a beautiful spot with grass, moss, deep shade, a clear stream, and fallen trees that looked impressive in their decay, tempting us to sit back and enjoy the coolness and happiness, we always found out that place was rumored to be infested with malaria.
A row upon the Ohio was another of our favourite amusements; but in this, I believe, we were also very singular, for often, when enjoying it, we were shouted at, by the young free-borns on the banks, as if we had been so many monsters.
A row on the Ohio was another one of our favorite pastimes; however, I think we were pretty unique in this because often, while we were enjoying ourselves, we were shouted at by the young locals on the banks as if we were some kind of monsters.
The only rural amusement in which we ever saw any of the natives engaged was eating strawberries and cream in a pretty garden about three miles from the town; here we actually met three or four carriages; a degree of dissipation that I never witnessed on any other occasion. The strawberries were tolerable strawberries, but the cream was the vilest sky-blue, and the charge half a dollar to each person; which being about the price of half a fat sheep, I thought “pretty considerable much,” if I may be permitted to use an expressive phrase of the country.
The only rural fun we ever saw the locals involved in was eating strawberries and cream in a nice garden about three miles from town. We even encountered three or four carriages there, which was a level of indulgence I had never seen before. The strawberries were decent, but the cream was the worst sky-blue color, and it cost half a dollar per person, which was roughly the price of half a fat sheep. I thought that was “pretty considerable much,” if I can use a colorful saying from the area.
We had repeatedly been told, by those who knew the land, that the second summer was the great trial to the health of Europeans settled in America; but we had now reached the middle of our second August, and with the exception of the fever one of my sons had suffered from, the summer after our arrival, we had all enjoyed perfect health; but I was now doomed to feel the truth of the above prediction, for before the end of August I fell low before the monster that is for ever stalking through that land of lakes and rivers, breathing fever and death around. It was nine weeks before I left my room, and when I did, I looked more fit to walk into the Potter’s Field, (as they call the English burying ground) than any where else.
We had been repeatedly told by those familiar with the area that the second summer was a major challenge to the health of Europeans living in America; but we had now reached the middle of our second August, and aside from the fever that one of my sons had experienced the summer after we arrived, we had all been in great health. However, I was about to learn the truth of that prediction, for before the end of August, I fell seriously ill due to the relentless threat that looms over that land of lakes and rivers, spreading fever and death. I spent nine weeks in my room, and when I finally emerged, I looked more like I belonged in Potter’s Field (as they call the English burial ground) than anywhere else.
Long after my general health was pretty well restored, I suffered from the effect of the fever in my limbs, and lay in bed reading several weeks after I had been pronounced convalescent. Several American novels were brought me. Mr. Flint’s Francis Berrian is excellent; a little wild and romantic, but containing scenes of first-rate interest and pathos. Hope Leslie, and Redwood, by Miss Sedgewick, an American lady, have both great merit; and I now first read the whole of Mr. Cooper’s novels. By the time these American studies were completed, I never closed my eyes without seeing myriads of bloody scalps floating round me; long slender figures of Red Indians crept through my dreams with noiseless tread; panthers flared; forests blazed; and which ever way I fled, a light foot, a keen eye, and a long rifle were sure to be on my trail. An additional ounce of calomel hardly sufficed to neutralize the effect of these raw-head and bloody-bones adventures. I was advised to plunge immediately into a course of fashionable novels. It was a great relief to me; but as my head was by no means very clear, I sometimes jumbled strangely together the civilized rogues and assassins of Mr. Bulwer, and the wild men, women, and children slayers of Mr. Cooper; and, truly, between them, I passed my dreams in very bad company.
Long after my overall health was mostly restored, I continued to feel the effects of the fever in my limbs and spent several weeks in bed reading, even after I was declared convalescent. I was given several American novels. Mr. Flint’s Francis Berrian is excellent; it’s a bit wild and romantic, but it has scenes of top-notch interest and emotion. Hope Leslie and Redwood, by Miss Sedgwick, an American author, both have great merit; and it was during this time that I read through all of Mr. Cooper’s novels for the first time. By the time I finished these American books, I couldn’t close my eyes without seeing countless bloody scalps floating around me; long, slender figures of Native Americans crept through my dreams silently; panthers flashed; forests blazed; and no matter which way I ran, a light foot, a sharp eye, and a long rifle were sure to be on my trail. Even an extra dose of calomel hardly managed to counteract the effect of these horror-filled adventures. I was advised to dive right into a selection of popular novels. It was a huge relief for me, but since my mind wasn’t completely clear, I sometimes mixed up the civilized crooks and murderers of Mr. Bulwer with the wild men, women, and child killers of Mr. Cooper; and honestly, between them, I had some very bad company in my dreams.
Still I could not stand, nor even sit upright. What was I to read next? A happy thought struck me. I determined upon beginning with Waverley, and reading through (not for the first time certainly) the whole series. And what a world did I enter upon! The wholesome vigour of every page seemed to communicate itself to my nerves; I ceased to be languid and fretful, and though still a cripple, I certainly enjoyed myself most completely, as long as my treat lasted; but this was a shorter time than any one would believe, who has not found how such volumes melt, before the constant reading of a long idle day. When it was over, however, I had the pleasure of finding that I could walk half a dozen yards at a time, and take short airings in an open carriage; and better still, could sleep quietly.
Still, I could neither stand nor sit up straight. What was I going to read next? A cheerful idea hit me. I decided to start with Waverley and re-read the entire series (not for the first time, that's for sure). And what a world I stepped into! The energy of every page seemed to fill my nerves; I stopped feeling weak and irritable, and even though I was still disabled, I completely enjoyed myself for as long as my reading session lasted. But it was shorter than anyone would believe who hasn't experienced how quickly those books can go by during a long, lazy day. When it was over, though, I was pleased to discover that I could walk a few yards at a time and take short outings in an open carriage; even better, I was able to sleep peacefully.
It was no very agreeable conviction which greeted my recovery, that our Cincinnati speculation for my son would in no way answer our expectation; and very soon after, he was again seized with the bilious fever of the country, which terminated in that most distressing of all maladies, an ague. I never witnessed is effects before, and therefore made my self extremely miserable at what those around me considered of no consequence.
It was not a pleasant realization when I recovered that our Cincinnati plan for my son would not meet our expectations; and shortly after, he was struck again by the country's bilious fever, which led to the most distressing illness of all, an ague. I had never seen its effects before, and so I made myself very unhappy over what those around me thought was trivial.
I believe this frightful complaint is not immediately dangerous; but I never can believe that the violent and sudden prostration of strength, the dreadfully convulsive movements which distort the limbs, the livid hue that spreads itself over the complexion, can take place without shaking the seat of health and life. Repeatedly we thought the malady cured, and for a few days the poor sufferer believed himself restored to health and strength; but again and again it returned upon him, and he began to give himself up as the victim of ill health. My own health was still very infirm, and it took but little time to decide that we must leave Cincinnati. The only impediment to this was, the fear that Mr. Trollope, who was to join us in the Spring, might have set out, and thus arrive at Cincinnati after we had left it. However, as the time he had talked of leaving England was later in the season, I decided upon running the risk; but the winter had set in with great severity, and the river being frozen, the steam-boats could not run; the frost continued unbroken through the whole of February, and we were almost weary of waiting for its departure, which was to be the signal of ours.
I think this terrible illness isn’t immediately life-threatening, but I can’t believe that the sudden and severe loss of strength, the horrible convulsions that twist the limbs, and the pale color that spreads across the face can happen without seriously affecting someone’s health. We often thought the illness was cured, and for a few days, the poor patient believed he was back to being healthy and strong. But time and again, it returned, and he started to feel like a victim of poor health. My own health was still very weak, and it didn’t take long to decide that we had to leave Cincinnati. The only thing holding us back was the fear that Mr. Trollope, who was supposed to join us in the spring, might have already left and arrived in Cincinnati after we had gone. Still, since he had mentioned leaving England later in the season, I decided it was a risk worth taking; however, winter set in harshly, and with the river frozen, the steamboats couldn’t operate. The frost endured throughout all of February, and we were almost exhausted from waiting for it to end, which would signal our departure.
The breaking up of the ice, on the Licking and Ohio, formed a most striking spectacle. At night the river presented a solid surface of ice, but in the morning it shewed a collection of floating icebergs, of every imaginable size and form, whirling against each other with frightful violence, and with a noise unlike any sound I remember.
The breaking up of the ice on the Licking and Ohio created a stunning sight. At night, the river looked like a solid sheet of ice, but in the morning, it showed a bunch of floating ice chunks of every possible size and shape, crashing into each other violently and making a noise I can’t compare to anything else I remember.
This sight was a very welcome one, as it gave us hopes of immediate departure, but my courage failed, when I heard that one or two steam-boats, weary of waiting, meant to start on the morrow. The idea of running against these floating islands was really alarming, and I was told by many, that my fears were not without foundation, for that repeated accidents had happened from this cause; and then they talked of the little Miami river, whose mouth we were to pass, sending down masses of ice that might stop our progress; in short, we waited patiently and prudently, till the learned in such matters told us that we might start with safety.
This view was a welcome one, as it gave us hopes of leaving soon, but my courage faltered when I heard that one or two steamers, tired of waiting, planned to leave the next day. The thought of clashing with these floating giants was genuinely frightening, and many people told me that my fears were valid, as there had been several accidents because of this. They then mentioned the little Miami River, whose mouth we were to pass, sending down chunks of ice that could halt our progress. In short, we waited patiently and wisely until the experts in these matters assured us that we could depart safely.
CHAPTER XVII
Departure from Cincinnati—Society on board the Steam-boat—Arrival at Wheeling—Bel Esprit
Departure from Cincinnati—People on board the Steamboat—Arrival at Wheeling—Bel Esprit
We quitted Cincinnati the beginning of March, 1830, and I believe there was not one of our party who did not experience a sensation of pleasure in leaving it. We had seen again and again all the queer varieties of it’s little world; had amused ourselves with it’s consequence, it’s taste, and it’s ton, till they had ceased to be amusing. Not a hill was left unclimbed, nor a forest path unexplored; and, with the exception of two or three individuals, who bore heads and hearts peculiar to no clime, but which are found scattered through the world, as if to keep us every where in good humour with it, we left nought to regret at Cincinnati. The only regret was, that we had ever entered it; for we had wasted health, time, and money there.
We left Cincinnati at the beginning of March 1830, and I believe everyone in our group felt a sense of relief as we did. We had seen all the odd aspects of its little world multiple times; we had entertained ourselves with its importance, its style, and its social scene until they became dull. Not a hill was left unscaled, nor a forest path unexplored; and except for a few individuals, who had unique minds and hearts not tied to any region but found around the globe to keep us amused, there was nothing to miss about Cincinnati. The only regret was that we had ever come there; we had wasted our health, time, and money in that place.
We got on board the steam-boat which was to convey us to Wheeling at three o’clock. She was a noble boat, by far the finest we had seen. The cabins were above, and the deck passengers, as they are called, were accommodated below. In front of the ladies’ cabin was an ample balcony, sheltered by an awning; chairs and sofas were placed there, and even at that early season, nearly all the female passengers passed the whole day there. The name of this splendid vessel was the Lady Franklin. By the way, I was often amused by the evident fondness which the Americans shew for titles. The wives of their eminent men constantly receive that of “Lady.” We heard of Lady Washington, Lady Jackson, and many other “ladies.” The eternal recurrence of their militia titles is particularly ludicrous, met with, as they are, among the tavern-keepers, market-gardeners, &c. But I think the most remarkable instance which we noticed of this sort of aristocratical longing occurred at Cincinnati. Mr. T— in speaking of a gentleman of the neighbourhood, called him Mr. M—. “General M—, sir,” observed his companion. “I beg his pardon,” rejoined Mr. T—, “but I was not aware of his being in the army.” “No, sir, not in the army,” was the reply, “but he was surveyor- general of the district.”
We boarded the steamboat that would take us to Wheeling at three o’clock. It was a beautiful boat, by far the best we had seen. The cabins were on the upper deck, and the deck passengers, as they’re called, were accommodated below. In front of the ladies’ cabin was a spacious balcony, covered by an awning; there were chairs and sofas placed there, and even at that early time of year, almost all the female passengers spent the whole day there. The name of this impressive vessel was the Lady Franklin. By the way, I often found it amusing how much Americans show their affection for titles. The wives of their prominent men often receive the title of “Lady.” We heard of Lady Washington, Lady Jackson, and many other “ladies.” The constant use of their militia titles is particularly comical, especially when you find them among tavern owners, market gardeners, etc. But I think the most notable example of this kind of aristocratic longing occurred in Cincinnati. Mr. T—, while talking about a gentleman from the area, referred to him as Mr. M—. “General M—, sir,” pointed out his companion. “I apologize,” responded Mr. T—, “but I wasn’t aware he was in the army.” “No, sir, not in the army,” was the reply, “but he was the surveyor-general of the district.”
The weather was delightful; all trace of winter had disappeared, and we again found ourselves moving rapidly up the stream, and enjoying all the beauty of the Ohio.
The weather was amazing; all signs of winter were gone, and we found ourselves quickly moving up the river, enjoying all the beauty of the Ohio.
Of the male part of the passengers we saw nothing, excepting at the short silent periods allotted for breakfast, dinner, and supper, at which we were permitted to enter their cabin, and place ourselves at their table.
Of the male passengers, we saw nothing, except during the brief quiet times set aside for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, when we were allowed to enter their cabin and join them at their table.
In the Lady Franklin we had decidedly the best of it, for we had our beautiful balcony to sit in. In all respects, indeed, our accommodations were very superior to what we had found in the boat which brought us from New Orleans to Memphis, where we were stowed away in a miserable little chamber close aft, under the cabin, and given to understand by the steward, that it was our duty there to remain “till such time as the bell should ring for meals.”
In the Lady Franklin, we definitely had the upper hand because we had our lovely balcony to relax on. In every way, our accommodations were far better than what we experienced on the boat that took us from New Orleans to Memphis, where we were crammed into a tiny, miserable cabin at the back, under the deck. The steward made it clear that we were expected to stay there “until the bell rang for meals.”
The separation of the sexes, so often mentioned, is no where more remarkable than on board the steam-boats. Among the passengers on this occasion we had a gentleman and his wife, who really appeared to suffer from the arrangement. She was an invalid, and he was extremely attentive to her, as far, at least, as the regulations permitted. When the steward opened the door of communication between the cabins, to permit our approaching the table, her husband was always stationed close to it to hand her to her place; and when he accompanied her again to the door, he always lingered for a moment or two on the forbidden threshold, nor left his station, till the last female had passed through. Once or twice he ventured, when all but his wife were on the balcony, to sit down beside her for a moment in our cabin, but the instant either of us entered, he started like a guilty thing and vanished.
The separation of the sexes, which is often talked about, is nowhere more noticeable than on the steam boats. Among the passengers this time, we had a man and his wife who seemed to truly struggle with the setup. She was unwell, and he was incredibly attentive to her, at least as much as the rules allowed. When the steward opened the door between the cabins to let us approach the table, her husband was always right there to help her to her seat; and when he escorted her back to the door, he always hesitated for a moment on the restricted threshold, not leaving his spot until the last woman had passed through. A couple of times, when everyone except his wife was on the balcony, he took a moment to sit beside her in our cabin, but the moment either of us walked in, he jumped up like he’d been caught and disappeared.
While mentioning the peculiar arrangements which are thought necessary to the delicacy of the American ladies, or the comfort of the American gentlemen, I am tempted to allude to a story which I saw in the papers respecting the visits which it was stated Captain Basil Hall persisted in making to his wife and child on board a Mississippi steam-boat, after bring informed that doing so was contrary to law. Now I happen to know that neither himself or Mrs. Hall ever entered the ladies’ cabin during the whole voyage, as they occupied a state-room which Captain Hall had secured for his party. The veracity of newspaper statements is, perhaps, nowhere quite unimpeachable, but if I am not greatly mistaken, there are more direct falsehoods circulated by the American newspapers than by all the others in the world, and the one great and never-failing source of these voluminous works of imagination is England and the English. How differently would such a voyage be managed on the other side of the Atlantic, were such a mode of travelling possible there. Such long calm river excursions would be perfectly delightful, and parties would be perpetually formed to enjoy them. Even were all the parties strangers to each other, the knowledge that they were to eat, drink, and steam away together for a week or fortnight, would induce something like a social feeling in any other country.
While talking about the unusual customs that seem necessary for the comfort of American ladies and gentlemen, I’m reminded of a story I saw in the papers about Captain Basil Hall, who supposedly kept visiting his wife and child on a Mississippi steamboat after being told it was against the law. I happen to know that neither he nor Mrs. Hall ever entered the ladies' cabin during the entire trip, as they had a stateroom reserved for their group. The truthfulness of newspaper articles isn’t always reliable, but if I’m not mistaken, American newspapers often spread more outright falsehoods than any others in the world, with England and the English being the main source of this imaginative storytelling. It’s hard to imagine how differently such a trip would be organized on the other side of the Atlantic if that style of travel were feasible there. Long, peaceful river journeys would be incredibly enjoyable, and groups would frequently come together to partake in them. Even if all the groups were strangers, just knowing they’d be sharing meals and traveling together for a week or two would create a sense of community in any other country.
It is true that the men became sufficiently acquainted to game together, and we were told that the opportunity was considered as so favourable, that no boat left New Orleans without having as cabin passengers one or two gentlemen from that city whose profession it was to drill the fifty-two elements of a pack of cards to profitable duty. This doubtless is an additional reason for the strict exclusion of the ladies from their society. The constant drinking of spirits is another, for though they do not scruple to chew tobacco and to spit incessantly in the presence of women, they generally prefer drinking and gaming in their absence.
It’s true that the men got to know each other well enough to play games together, and we heard that the chance was seen as so good that no boat left New Orleans without having one or two gentlemen aboard. These guys made their living by turning the fifty-two cards in a deck into money. This is probably another reason why women were kept away from them. The constant drinking is another reason, because while they don’t hesitate to chew tobacco and spit in front of women, they usually prefer to drink and gamble when the ladies aren’t around.
I often used to amuse myself with fancying the different scene which such a vessel would display in Europe. The noble length of the gentlemen’s cabin would be put into requisition for a dance, while that of the ladies, with their delicious balcony, would be employed for refreshments, instead of sitting down in two long silent melancholy rows, to swallow as much coffee and beef-steak as could be achieved in ten minutes. Then song and music would be heard borne along by the midnight breeze; but on the Ohio, when light failed to shew us the bluffs, and the trees, with their images inverted in the stream, we crept into our little cots, listening to the ceaseless churning of the engine, in hope it would prove a lullaby till morning.
I often used to entertain myself by imagining the different scenes such a vessel would create in Europe. The spacious gentlemen’s cabin would be used for dancing, while the ladies’ cabin, complete with its lovely balcony, would serve as a place for refreshments, instead of everyone sitting in two long, quiet, sad rows, trying to eat as much coffee and steak as they could in ten minutes. There would be singing and music carried along by the midnight breeze; but on the Ohio, when the light faded and we couldn’t see the bluffs and the trees reflected in the water, we crawled into our little beds, listening to the constant roar of the engine, hoping it would act as a lullaby until morning.
We were three days in reaching Wheeling, where we arrived at last, at two o’clock in the morning, an uncomfortable hour to disembark with a good deal of luggage, as the steam-boat was obliged to go on immediately; but we were instantly supplied with a dray, and in a few moments found ourselves comfortably seated before a good fire, at an hotel near the landing-place; our rooms, with fires in them, were immediately ready for us, and refreshments brought, with all that sedulous attention which in this country distinguishes a slave state. In making this observation I am very far from intending to advocate the system of slavery; I conceive it to be essentially wrong; but so far as my observation has extended, I think its influence is far less injurious to the manners and morals of the people than the fallacious ideas of equality, which are so fondly cherished by the working classes of the white population in America. That these ideas are fallacious, is obvious, for in point of fact the man possessed of dollars does command the services of the man possessed of no dollars; but these services are given grudgingly, and of necessity, with no appearance of cheerful goodwill on the one side, or of kindly interest on the other. I never failed to mark the difference on entering a slave state. I was immediately comfortable, and at my ease, and felt that the intercourse between me and those who served me, was profitable to both parties and painful to neither.
We took three days to reach Wheeling, arriving finally at two o’clock in the morning, which wasn’t the best time to disembark with a lot of luggage since the steamboat had to leave right away. However, we quickly got a dray, and within moments, we were comfortably seated by a warm fire at a hotel near the landing. Our rooms were ready with fires already lit, and refreshments were brought to us with that attentive service that characterizes a slave state in this country. I want to be clear that I do not support the system of slavery; I believe it is fundamentally wrong. However, from what I’ve observed, its impact on the manners and morals of people seems less harmful than the misleading ideas of equality that the working class of white Americans hold dear. These ideas are clearly flawed because, in reality, a person with money can command the services of someone without it. Yet those services are offered reluctantly and out of necessity, lacking any genuine goodwill or care from either side. I always noticed the difference when entering a slave state. I immediately felt comfortable and at ease, sensing that the interaction between me and those serving me was beneficial for both sides and not uncomfortable for either.
It was not till I had leisure for more minute observation that I felt aware of the influence of slavery upon the owners of slaves; when I did, I confess I could not but think that the citizens of the United States had contrived, by their political alchymy, to extract all that was most noxious both in democracy and in slavery, and had poured the strange mixture through every vein of the moral organization of their country.
It wasn't until I had the time for closer observation that I became aware of the impact of slavery on slave owners. Once I did, I must admit I couldn't help but think that the citizens of the United States had managed, through their political tricks, to take out all the worst parts of both democracy and slavery, and had spread this strange blend throughout the moral fabric of their country.
Wheeling is the state of Virginia, and appears to be a flourishing town. It is the point at which most travellers from the West leave the Ohio, to take the stages which travel the mountain road to the Atlantic cities.
Wheeling is in the state of Virginia and seems to be a thriving town. It's the place where most travelers from the West leave the Ohio River to take the coaches that travel the mountain route to the Atlantic cities.
It has many manufactories, among others, one for blowing and cutting glass, which we visited. We were told by the workmen that the articles finished there were equal to any in the world; but my eyes refused their assent. The cutting was very good, though by no means equal to what we see in daily use in London; but the chief inferiority is in the material, which is never altogether free from colour. I had observed this also in the glass of the Pittsburgh manufactory, the labour bestowed on it always appearing greater than the glass deserved. They told us also, that they were rapidly improving in the art, and I have no doubt that this was true.
It has many factories, including one for blowing and cutting glass, which we visited. The workers told us that the finished products were as good as any in the world, but I couldn’t agree. The cutting was quite good, but not nearly as impressive as what we see in London every day. The main issue is with the material, which is never completely free from color. I noticed the same with the glass from the Pittsburgh factory; the effort put into it always seemed greater than what the glass warranted. They also mentioned that they were quickly improving in the craft, and I believe that was true.
Wheeling has little of beauty to distinguish it, except the ever lovely Ohio, to which we here bid adieu, and a fine bold hill, which rises immediately behind the town. This hill, as well as every other in the neighbourhood, is bored for coal. Their mines are all horizontal. The coal burns well, but with a very black and dirty cinder.
Wheeling doesn’t have much beauty that sets it apart, except for the always beautiful Ohio River, which we now say goodbye to, and a striking hill that rises right behind the town. This hill, like every other in the area, has been drilled for coal. Their mines are all horizontal. The coal burns well but leaves a very black and dirty ash.
We found the coach, by which we meant to proceed to Little Washington, full, and learnt that we must wait two days before it would again leave the town. Posting was never heard of in the country, and the mail travelled all night, which I did not approve of; we therefore found ourselves compelled to pass two days at the Wheeling hotel.
We found the coach we planned to take to Little Washington was full, and we learned we would have to wait two days before it would leave town again. There was no such thing as posting in the area, and the mail traveled all night, which I didn't like; so we ended up having to spend two days at the Wheeling hotel.
I know not how this weary interval would have worn away, had it not been for the fortunate circumstance of our meeting with a bel esprit among the boarders there. We descended to the common sitting room (for private parlours there are none) before breakfast the morning after our arrival; several ordinary individuals entered, till the party amounted to eight or nine. Again the door opened, and in swam a female, who had once certainly been handsome, and who, it was equally evident, still thought herself so. She was tall, and well formed, dressed in black, with many gaudy trinkets about her: a scarlet fichu relieved the sombre colour of her dress, and a very smart little cap at the back of her head set off an immense quantity of sable hair, which naturally, or artificially, adorned her forehead. A becoming quantity of rouge gave the finishing touch to her figure, which had a degree of pretension about it that immediately attracted our notice. She talked fluently, and without any American restraint, and I began to be greatly puzzled as to who or what she could be; a lady, in the English sense of the word, I was sure she was not, and she was a little like an American female of what they call good standing. A beautiful girl of seventeen entered soon after, and called her “Ma,” and both mother and daughter chattered away, about themselves and their concerns, in a manner that greatly increased my puzzle.
I don't know how this exhausting time would have passed if it hadn't been for the lucky chance of meeting a lively person among the other guests there. We went down to the common sitting room (since there were no private parlors) before breakfast the morning after we arrived; several ordinary people came in until the group reached eight or nine. Again, the door opened, and in walked a woman who had once definitely been beautiful, and who, it was clear, still thought she was. She was tall and well-shaped, dressed in black, with many flashy jewelry pieces: a bright red shawl broke up the dark color of her dress, and a trendy little cap at the back of her head accentuated a huge amount of dark hair that framed her forehead, whether naturally or artificially. A suitable amount of makeup completed her look, which had an air of pretentiousness that immediately caught our attention. She spoke fluently, without any American shyness, and I started to wonder greatly about who she could be; I was sure she wasn’t a lady in the English sense of the word, and she was somewhat reminiscent of an American woman of what they call good standing. A beautiful girl of seventeen came in shortly after and called her "Mom," and both mother and daughter chatted away about themselves and their lives in a way that deepened my confusion.
After breakfast, being much in want of amusement, I seated myself by her, and entered into conversation. I found her nothing loth, and in about a minute and a half she put a card into my hand, setting forth, that she taught the art of painting upon velvet in all its branches.
After breakfast, really needing some entertainment, I sat down next to her and started a conversation. I found she was happy to talk, and in just a minute and a half, she handed me a card that stated she taught the art of painting on velvet in all its forms.
She stated to me, with great volubility, that no one but herself and her daughter knew any thing of this invaluable branch of art; but that for twenty-five dollars they were willing to communicate all they knew.
She told me, very enthusiastically, that only she and her daughter knew anything about this priceless art form; but for twenty-five dollars, they were willing to share everything they knew.
In five minutes more she informed me that she was the author of some of the most cutting satires in the language; and then she presented me a paper, containing a prospectus, as she called it, of a novel, upon an entirely new construction. I was strangely tempted to ask her if it went by steam, but she left me no time to ask any thing, for, continuing the autobiography she had so obligingly begun, she said, “I used to write against all the Adams faction. I will go up stairs in a moment and fetch you down my sat-heres against that side. But oh! my dear madam! it is really frightful to think how talent is neglected in this country. Ah! I know what you are going to say, my dear madam, you will tell me that it is not so in yours. I know it! but alas! the Atlantic! However, I really must tell you how I have been treated: not only did I publish the most biting sat-heres against the Adams faction, but I wrote songs and odes in honour of Jackson; and my daughter, Cordelia, sang a splendid song of my writing, before eight hundred people, entirely and altogether written in his praise; and would you believe it, my dear madam, he has never taken the slightest notice of me, or made me the least remuneration. But you can’t suppose I mean to bear it quietly? No! I promise him that is not my way. The novel I have just mentioned to you was began as a sentimental romance (that, perhaps, after all, is my real forte), but after the provocation I received at Washington, I turned it into a sat-herical novel, and I now call it Yankee Doodle Court. By the way my dear madam, I think if I could make up my mind to cross that terrible Atlantic, I should be pretty well received, after writing Yankee Doodle Court!”
In five more minutes, she told me that she was the author of some of the sharpest satirical works in the language; then she handed me a paper, which she called a prospectus, for a novel with a completely new format. I was oddly tempted to ask her if it was powered by steam, but she didn’t give me a chance to ask anything. Continuing the autobiography she had so kindly started, she said, “I used to write against all the Adams supporters. I’ll go upstairs in a moment and get my satires against that side for you. But oh! my dear lady! it’s really shocking to think how talent is overlooked in this country. Ah! I know what you’re going to say, my dear lady—you’ll tell me it’s not like that in yours. I know! But alas! the Atlantic! Anyway, I really must tell you how I’ve been treated: not only did I publish the sharpest satires against the Adams faction, but I also wrote songs and odes in honor of Jackson; and my daughter, Cordelia, performed a fantastic song I wrote, in front of eight hundred people, entirely dedicated to him; and would you believe it, my dear lady, he has never acknowledged me or compensated me in the slightest. But you can’t think I intend to take that lying down? No! I assure you, that’s not my style. The novel I just mentioned started as a sentimental romance (which, perhaps, is my real strength after all), but after the insults I faced in Washington, I turned it into a satirical novel, and I now call it Yankee Doodle Court. By the way, my dear lady, I think if I could bring myself to cross that dreadful Atlantic, I’d be pretty well received after writing Yankee Doodle Court!”
I took the opportunity of a slight pause to ask her to what party she now belonged, since she had forsworn both Adams and Jackson.
I took the chance during a brief break to ask her which party she was now part of, since she had renounced both Adams and Jackson.
“Oh Clay! Clay for ever! he is a real true-hearted republican; the others are neither more nor less than tyrants.”
“Oh Clay! Clay forever! He’s a genuinely true-hearted republican; the others are nothing more or less than tyrants.”
When next I entered the sitting-room she again addressed me, to deplore the degenerate taste of the age.
When I walked into the living room again, she spoke to me once more, bemoaning the poor taste of this generation.
“Would you believe it? I have at this moment a comedy ready for representation; I call it ‘The Mad Philosopher.’ It is really admirable, and its success certain, if I could get it played. I assure you the neglect I meet with amounts perfectly to persecution. But I have found out how to pay them, and to make my own fortune. Sat-here, (as she constantly pronounced satire) sat-here is the only weapon that can revenge neglect, and I flatter myself I know how to use it. Do me the favour to look at this,”
“Can you believe it? I currently have a comedy ready for performance; I call it ‘The Mad Philosopher.’ It’s truly brilliant, and its success is guaranteed if I can get it staged. I assure you, the neglect I experience borders on persecution. But I’ve figured out how to get back at them and create my own success. Sat-here, (as she always pronounced satire) sat-here is the only weapon that can retaliate against neglect, and I’m confident I know how to wield it. Please do me the favor of checking this out,”
She then presented me with a tiny pamphlet, whose price, she informed me, was twenty-five cents, which I readily paid to become the possessor of this chef d’oeuvre. The composition was pretty nearly such as I anticipated, excepting that the English language was done to death by her pen still more than by her tongue. The epigraph, which was subscribed “original,” was as follows:
She then handed me a small pamphlet, which she told me cost twenty-five cents, and I quickly paid to own this masterpiece. The content was pretty much what I expected, except that her writing mangled the English language even more than her speaking did. The tagline, labeled “original,” read as follows:
“Your popularity’s on the decline:
You had your triumph! now I’ll have mine.”
“Your popularity is fading:
You had your moment! Now it’s my turn.”
These are rather a favourable specimen of the verses that follow.
These are a pretty good example of the verses that come next.
In a subsequent conversation she made me acquainted with another talent, informing me that she had played the part of Charlotte, in Love à la mode, when General Lafayette honoured the theatre at Cincinnati with his presence.
In a later conversation, she introduced me to another skill, telling me that she had played the role of Charlotte in Love à la mode when General Lafayette graced the Cincinnati theater with his presence.
She now appeared to have run out the catalogue of her accomplishments; and I came to the conclusion that my new acquaintance was a strolling player: but she seemed to guess my thoughts, for she presently added. “It was a Thespian corps that played before the General.”
She now seemed to have exhausted her list of achievements; and I concluded that my new acquaintance was a traveling actress: but she appeared to sense my thoughts, for she soon added, “It was a theater company that performed for the General.”
CHAPTER XVIII
Departure for the mountains in the Stage—Scenery of the Alleghany—Haggerstown
Departure for the mountains in the Stage—Scenery of the Alleghany—Haggerstown
The weather was bleak and disagreeable during the two days we were obliged to remain at Wheeling. I had got heartily tired of my gifted friend; we had walked up every side of the rugged hill, and I set off on my journey towards the mountains with more pleasure than is generally felt in quitting a pillow before daylight, for a cold corner in a rumbling stage-coach.
The weather was gloomy and unpleasant during the two days we had to stay in Wheeling. I had grown thoroughly tired of my talented friend; we had walked up every side of the steep hill, and I set off on my journey toward the mountains with more joy than is usually felt when leaving a warm bed before dawn for a cold spot in a bumpy stagecoach.
This was the first time we had got into an American stage, though we had traversed above two thousand miles of the country, and we had all the satisfaction in it, which could be derived from the conviction that we were travelling in a foreign land. This vehicle had no step, and we climbed into it by a ladder; when that was removed I remembered, with some dismay, that the females at least were much in the predicament of sailors, who, “in danger have no door to creep out,” but when a misfortune is absolutely inevitable, we are apt to bear it remarkably well; who would utter that constant petition of ladies on rough roads, “let me get out,” when compliance would oblige the pleader to make a step of five feet before she could touch the ground?
This was the first time we had stepped onto an American stage, even though we had traveled over two thousand miles through the country, and we experienced all the satisfaction that came from knowing we were in a foreign land. This vehicle had no steps, so we climbed into it using a ladder; when that was taken away, I realized, with some concern, that the women were very much like sailors, who, “in danger have no door to creep out.” Yet when bad luck is unavoidable, we tend to handle it pretty well; who would say that frequent request from women on bumpy roads, “let me get out,” when doing so would force them to take a five-foot leap before reaching the ground?
The coach had three rows of seats, each calculated to hold three persons, and as we were only six, we had, in the phrase of Milton, to “inhabit lax” this exalted abode, and, accordingly, we were for some miles tossed about like a few potatoes in a wheelbarrow. Our knees, elbows, and heads required too much care for their protection to allow us leisure to look out of the windows; but at length the road became smoother, and we became more skilful in the art of balancing ourselves, so as to meet the concussion with less danger of dislocation.
The coach had three rows of seats, each designed for three people, and since there were only six of us, we had to “stretch out” in this fancy ride, so we were tossed around for a few miles like a couple of potatoes in a wheelbarrow. We had to pay so much attention to keeping our knees, elbows, and heads safe that we didn't have time to look out the windows; but eventually the road got smoother, and we got better at balancing ourselves, which helped us handle the bumps with less risk of getting hurt.
We then found that we were travelling through a very beautiful country, essentially different in its features from what we had been accustomed to round Cincinnati: it is true we had left “la belle rivière” behind us, but the many limpid and rapid little streams that danced through the landscape to join it, more than atoned for its loss.
We then realized we were traveling through a really beautiful area, completely different in its features from what we were used to around Cincinnati: it's true we had left “la belle rivière” behind us, but the many clear and fast little streams that flowed through the scenery more than made up for its absence.
The country already wore an air of more careful husbandry, and the very circumstance of a wide and costly road (though not a very smooth one), which in theory might be supposed to injure picturesque effect, was beautiful to us, who, since we had entered the muddy mouth of the Mississippi, had never seen any thing except a steam-boat and the levee professing to have so noble an object as public accommodation. Through the whole of the vast region we had passed, excepting at New Orleans itself, every trace of the art of man appeared to be confined to the individual effort of “getting along,” which, in western phrase, means contriving to live with as small a portion of the incumbrances of civilized society as possible.
The country had a vibe of more careful farming, and the fact that there was a wide and expensive road (even if it wasn’t very smooth) that could supposedly ruin the picturesque view was actually beautiful to us. Since we had entered the muddy mouth of the Mississippi, we hadn’t seen anything except a steamboat and the levee claiming to have such a grand purpose as public accommodation. Throughout the vast area we traveled, except in New Orleans itself, all signs of human effort seemed to be limited to the individual pursuit of “getting by,” which, in western terms, means figuring out how to live with as few of the burdens of civilized society as possible.
This road was made at the expense of the government as far as Cumberland, a town situated among the Alleghany mountains, and, from the nature of the ground, must have been a work of great cost. I regretted not having counted the number of bridges between Wheeling and Little Washington, a distance of thirty-four miles; over one stream only there are twenty-five, all passed by the road. They frequently occurred within a hundred yards of each other, so serpentine is its course; they are built of stone, and sometimes very neatly finished.
This road was built at the government's expense all the way to Cumberland, a town located in the Allegheny Mountains. Given the terrain, it must have been very expensive to construct. I wish I had counted the number of bridges between Wheeling and Little Washington, which is a distance of thirty-four miles; there are twenty-five bridges over just one stream, all along the route. They often come up within a hundred yards of each other, making the path quite winding; the bridges are made of stone and are sometimes very well-crafted.
Little Washington is in Pennsylvania, across a corner of which the road runs. This is a free state, but we were still waited upon by Negroes, hired from the neighbouring state of Virginia. We arrived at night, and set off again at four in the morning; all, therefore, that we saw of Little Washington was its hotel, which was clean and comfortable. The first part of the next day’s journey was through a country much less interesting: its character was unvaried for nearly thirty miles, consisting of an uninterrupted succession of forest-covered hills. As soon as we had wearily dragged to the top of one of these, we began to rumble down the other side as rapidly as our four horses could trot; and no sooner arrived at the bottom than we began to crawl up again; the trees constantly so thick and so high as to preclude the possibility of seeing fifty yards in any direction.
Little Washington is in Pennsylvania, and the road runs through a corner of it. This is a free state, but we were still attended to by Black people hired from the neighboring state of Virginia. We arrived at night and set off again at four in the morning, so all we saw of Little Washington was its clean and comfortable hotel. The first part of the next day's journey was through a much less interesting area; it looked the same for nearly thirty miles, just a continuous line of forest-covered hills. As soon as we wearily made it to the top of one of these hills, we started to rumble down the other side as fast as our four horses could trot; and no sooner had we reached the bottom than we began to climb up again. The trees were so thick and tall that it was impossible to see more than fifty yards in any direction.
The latter part of the day, however, amply repaid us. At four o’clock we began to ascend the Alleghany mountains: the first ridge on the western side is called Laurel Hill, and takes its name from the profuse quantity of evergreens with which it is covered; not any among them, however, being the shrub to which we give the name of laurel.
The latter part of the day, however, rewarded us well. At four o’clock we started to climb the Alleghany mountains: the first ridge on the western side is called Laurel Hill, named for the abundance of evergreens covering it; however, none of them are the shrub we refer to as laurel.
The whole of this mountain region, through ninety miles of which the road passes, is a garden. The almost incredible variety of plants, and the lavish profusion of their growth, produce an effect perfectly enchanting. I really can hardly conceive a higher enjoyment than a botanical tour among the Alleghany mountains, to any one who had science enough to profit by it.
The entire mountain area, which the road stretches through for ninety miles, is like a garden. The unbelievable variety of plants and their abundant growth create a truly enchanting scene. I can hardly imagine a greater pleasure than going on a botanical tour in the Alleghany mountains for anyone knowledgeable enough to appreciate it.
The magnificent rhododendron first caught our eyes; it fringes every cliff, nestles beneath every rock, and blooms around every tree. The azalia, the shumac, and every variety of that beautiful mischief, the kalmia, are in equal profusion. Cedars of every size and form were above, around, and underneath us; firs more beautiful and more various than I had ever seen, were in equal abundance, but I know not whether they were really such as I had never seen in Europe, or only in infinitely greater splendour and perfection of growth; the species called the hemlock is, I think, second to the cedar only, in magnificence. Oak and beech, with innumerable roses and wild vines, hanging in beautiful confusion among their branches, were in many places scattered among the evergreens. The earth was carpeted with various mosses and creeping plants, and though still in the month of March, not a trace of the nakedness of winter could be seen. Such was the scenery that shewed us we were indeed among the far-famed Alleghany mountains.
The stunning rhododendron was the first to catch our attention; it lined every cliff, nestled under every rock, and bloomed around every tree. The azaleas, shumac, and all the varieties of that beautiful troublemaker, the kalmia, were just as abundant. Cedars of every size and shape surrounded us; firs, more beautiful and varied than I had ever seen, were everywhere, though I’m not sure if they were truly different from those in Europe or just much more magnificent and perfectly grown. The species called hemlock, I think, is only slightly less magnificent than cedar. Oak and beech trees, along with countless roses and wild vines, were beautifully intertwined among their branches in many areas, scattered among the evergreens. The ground was covered in different mosses and creeping plants, and even though it was still March, not a hint of winter's barrenness was visible. This was the scenery that confirmed we were truly in the famous Alleghany mountains.
As our noble terrace-road, the Semplon of America, rose higher and higher, all that is noblest in nature was joined to all that is sweetest. The blue tops of the higher ridges formed the outline; huge masses of rock rose above us on the left, half hid at intervals by the bright green shrubs, while to the right we looked down upon the tops of the pines and cedars which clothed the bottom.
As our beautiful terrace road, the Semplon of America, climbed higher and higher, all the best of nature merged with all that is most delightful. The blue peaks of the higher ridges created the outline; enormous rock formations towered above us on the left, partially hidden at times by the bright green shrubs, while on the right we looked down at the treetops of the pines and cedars that covered the valley below.
I had no idea of the endless variety of mountain scenery. My notions had been of rocks and precipices, of torrents and of forest trees, but I little expected that the first spot which should recall the garden scenery of our beautiful England would be found among the moutains: yet so it was. From the time I entered America I had never seen the slightest approach to what we call pleasure-grounds; a few very worthless and scentless flowers were all the specimens of gardening I had seen in Ohio; no attempt at garden scenery was ever dreamed of, and it was with the sort of delight with which one meets an old friend, that we looked on the lovely mixture of trees, shrubs, and flowers, that now continually met our eyes. Often, on descending into the narrow vallies, we found a little spot of cultivation, a garden or a field, hedged round with shumacs, rhododendrons, and azalias, and a cottage covered with roses. These vallies are spots of great beauty; a clear stream is always found running through them, which is generally converted to the use of the miller, at some point not far from the road; and here, as on the heights, great beauty of colouring is given to the landscape, by the bright hue of the vegetation, and the sober grey of the rocks.
I had no idea just how diverse mountain scenery could be. I thought it would only be rocks and cliffs, rushing waters, and forest trees, but I didn’t expect that the first place to remind me of the beautiful gardens of England would be in the mountains—yet here we were. Since I arrived in America, I hadn’t seen anything close to what we call pleasure gardens; just a few unimpressive and scentless flowers were all I encountered in Ohio. There was no thought of garden scenery whatsoever, and we felt a kind of joy, like meeting an old friend, as we took in the beautiful blend of trees, shrubs, and flowers that continuously filled our view. Often, as we descended into the narrow valleys, we discovered small cultivated areas, gardens or fields, enclosed by sumacs, rhododendrons, and azaleas, with cottages covered in roses. These valleys are incredibly beautiful; a clear stream always runs through them, which is typically used by the miller at a spot not far from the road. Here, as on the heights, the landscape is colorful and vibrant, with the bright hues of the vegetation contrasting against the sober grey of the rocks.
The first night we passed among the mountains recalled us painfully from the enjoyment of nature to all the petty miseries of personal discomfort. Arrived at our inn, a forlorn parlour, filled with the blended fumes of tobacco and whiskey, received us; and chilled, as we began to feel ourselves with the mountain air, we preferred going to our cold bedrooms rather than sup in such an atmosphere. We found linen on the beds which they assured us had only been used a few nights; every kind of refreshment we asked for we were answered, “We do not happen to have that article.” We were still in Pennsylvania, and no longer waited upon by slaves; it was, therefore, with great difficulty that we procured a fire in our bedrooms from the surly-looking young lady who condescended to officiate as chambermaid, and with much more, that we extorted clean linen for our beds; that done, we patiently crept into them supperless, while she made her exit muttering about the difficulty of “fixing English folks.”
The first night we spent in the mountains reminded us painfully of all the little discomforts we faced, pulling us away from the enjoyment of nature. When we got to our inn, we were greeted by a dreary parlor filled with the mixed smells of tobacco and whiskey. As we began to feel the chill from the mountain air, we chose to head to our cold bedrooms instead of eating in such an unwelcoming atmosphere. The beds had sheets that they assured us had only been used a few nights; for every kind of snack we requested, we were told, “We don’t have that.” We were still in Pennsylvania and no longer waited on by slaves, so it was quite a struggle to get a fire in our rooms from the surly-looking young lady who begrudgingly acted as the maid, and it took even more effort to get clean sheets for our beds. Once that was finally done, we quietly climbed into bed without dinner while she left grumbling about how hard it was to “deal with English folks.”
The next morning cheered our spirits again; we now enjoyed a new kind of alpine witchery; the clouds were floating around, and below us, and the distant peaks were indistinctly visible as through a white gauze veil, which was gradually lifted up, till the sun arose, and again let in upon us the full glory of these interminable heights.
The next morning lifted our spirits once more; we experienced a fresh kind of mountain magic. The clouds were drifting around us, and far below, the distant peaks were barely visible through a white gauzy veil that gradually lifted until the sun came up and revealed the full beauty of these endless heights.
We were told before we began the ascent, that we should find snow four inches deep on the road; but as yet we had seen none, and indeed it was with difficulty we persuaded ourselves that we were not travelling in the midst of summer. As we proceeded, however, we found the northern declivities still covered with it, and at length, towards the summit, the road itself had the promised four inches. The extreme mildness of the air, and the brilliant hue of the evergreens, contrasted strangely with this appearance of winter; it was difficult to understand how the snow could help melting in such an atmosphere.
We were told before we started the climb that we would find snow four inches deep on the road; however, we hadn’t seen any yet, and honestly, it was hard to convince ourselves we weren’t traveling in the middle of summer. As we continued, though, we discovered the northern slopes were still covered in snow, and finally, as we neared the top, the road had the promised four inches. The unusually warm air and the bright green of the evergreens made a strange contrast with this winter scene; it was hard to believe the snow wouldn’t melt in such a warm environment.
Again and again we enjoyed all the exhilarating sensations that such scenes must necessarily inspire, but in attempting a continued description of our progress over these beautiful mountains, I could only tell again of rocks, cedars, laurels, and running streams, of blue heights, and green vallies, yet the continually varying combinations of these objects afforded us unceasing pleasure. From one point, pre-eminently above any neighbouring ridge, we looked back upon the enormous valley of the West. It is a stupendous view; but having gazed upon it for some moments, we turned to pursue our course, and the certainty that we should see it no more, raised no sigh of regret.
Again and again, we relished all the thrilling sensations that such scenes naturally inspire. However, in trying to describe our journey through these beautiful mountains, I could only repeat what I had already shared: rocks, cedars, laurels, and flowing streams, along with blue heights and green valleys. Still, the ever-changing combinations of these elements gave us endless joy. From one spot, higher than any nearby ridge, we looked back at the vast valley to the west. It's an incredible sight; but after taking it in for a few moments, we turned to continue our journey, and knowing we wouldn’t see it again didn’t bring a single sigh of regret.
We dined, on the second day, at a beautiful spot, which we were told was the highest point on the road, being 2,846 feet above the level of the sea. We were regaled luxuriously on wild turkey and mountain venison; which latter is infinitely superior to any furnished by the forests of the Mississippi, or the Ohio. The vegetables also were extremely fine, and we were told by a pretty girl, who superintended the slaves that waited on us, (for we were again in Virginia), that the vegetables of the Alleghany were reckoned the finest in America. She told us also, that wild strawberries were profusely abundant, and very fine; that their cows found for themselves, during the summer, plenty of flowery food, which produced a copious supply of milk; that their spring gave them the purest water, of icy coldness in the warmest seasons; and that the climate was the most delicious in the world, for though the thermometer sometimes stood at ninety, their cool breeze never failed them. What a spot to turn hermit in for a summer! My eloquent mountaineer gave me some specimens of ground plants, far unlike any thing I had ever seen. One particularly, which she called the ground pine, is peculiar as she told me, to the Alleghany, and in some places runs over whole acres of ground; it is extremely beautiful. The rooms were very prettily decorated with this elegant plant, hung round it in festoons.
We had dinner on the second day at a beautiful place, which we were told was the highest point on the road, standing 2,846 feet above sea level. We enjoyed a luxurious meal of wild turkey and mountain venison, which is way better than anything you’d find in the forests of the Mississippi or Ohio. The vegetables were also exceptional, and a pretty girl supervising the waitstaff (since we were once again in Virginia) told us that the vegetables from the Alleghany were considered the best in America. She also mentioned that wild strawberries were abundant and really good; their cows found plenty of flowering plants to eat during the summer, which led to a great supply of milk; their spring provided the purest, icy cold water even in the hottest seasons; and that the climate was the most pleasant in the world, because even though the temperature sometimes hit ninety, they always had a cool breeze. What an ideal place to be a hermit for the summer! My eloquent mountaineer friend showed me some specimens of ground plants, completely different from anything I had seen before. One in particular, which she called ground pine, is unique to the Alleghany and in some areas covers whole acres; it’s incredibly beautiful. The rooms were tastefully decorated with this elegant plant, draped around in garlands.
In many places the clearing has been considerable; the road passes through several fine farms, situated in the sheltered hollows; we were told that the wolves continue to annoy them severely, but that panthers, the terror of the West, are never seen, and bears very rarely. Of snakes, they confessed they had abundance, but very few that were considered dangerous.
In many places, the clearing has been significant; the road runs through several great farms located in the protected valleys. We heard that wolves are still a major nuisance for them, but panthers, the fear of the West, are hardly ever spotted, and bears are very rare. They admitted that they have plenty of snakes, but very few are considered dangerous.
In the afternoon we came in sight of the Monongehala river; and its banks gave us for several miles a beautiful succession of wild and domestic scenery. In some points, the black rock rises perpendicularly from its margin, like those at Chepstow; at others, a mill, with its owner’s cottage, its corn-plat, and its poultry, present a delightful image of industry and comfort.
In the afternoon, we caught sight of the Monongahela River, and its banks offered us several miles of stunning views combining wild and rural scenery. In some spots, the dark rock rises steeply from the river's edge, reminiscent of those at Chepstow; in others, a mill along with the owner’s cottage, cornfield, and poultry creates a charming picture of hard work and comfort.
Brownsville is a busy looking little town built upon the banks of this river; it would be pretty, were it not stained by the hue of coal. I do not remember in England to have seen any spot, however near a coal mine, so dyed in black as Wheeling and Brownsville. At this place we crossed the Monongehala, in a flat ferry-boat, which very commodiously received our huge coach and four horses.
Brownsville is a bustling little town located on the banks of this river; it could be quite charming if it weren’t tainted by the color of coal. I don’t recall seeing any place in England, no matter how close to a coal mine, as blackened as Wheeling and Brownsville. Here, we crossed the Monongahela River on a flat ferry boat that comfortably accommodated our large coach and four horses.
On leaving the black little town, we were again cheered by abundance of evergreens, reflected in the stream, with fantastic piles of rock, half visible through the pines and cedars above, giving often the idea of a vast gothic castle. It was a folly, I confess, but I often lamented they were not such; the travelling for thousands of miles, without meeting any nobler trace of the ages that are passed, than a mass of rotten leaves, or a fragment of fallen rock, produces a heavy, earthly matter-of-fact effect upon the imagination, which can hardly be described, and for which the greatest beauty of scenery can furnish only an occasional and transitory remedy.
On leaving the small, dark town, we were once again greeted by plenty of evergreens, reflected in the stream, with strange piles of rock, partially visible through the pines and cedars above, often giving the impression of a massive gothic castle. I admit it was a bit of a fantasy, but I often wished they were real; traveling thousands of miles without encountering anything more impressive from the past than a bunch of decaying leaves or a piece of crumbled rock creates a heavy, realistic feeling on the imagination, which is hard to explain, and for which the greatest beauty of scenery can only provide a brief and fleeting escape.
Our second night in the mountains was past at a solitary house of rather forlorn appearance; but we fared much better than the night before, for they gave us clean sheets, a good fire, and no scolding. We again started at four o’clock in the morning, and eagerly watched for the first gleam of light that should show the same lovely spectacle we had seen the day before; nor were we disappointed, though the show was somewhat different. The vapours caught the morning ray, as it first darted over the mountain top, and passing it to the scene below, we seemed enveloped in a rainbow.
Our second night in the mountains was spent at a lonely house that looked pretty sad; but we had a much better experience than the night before because they gave us clean sheets, a nice fire, and no scolding. We started again at four in the morning, eagerly watching for the first light that would reveal the same beautiful view we had seen the day before; and we weren’t disappointed, even though the scene was a bit different. The mist caught the morning light as it first broke over the mountain top, and passing it down to the scene below, we felt surrounded by a rainbow.
We had now but one ridge left to pass over, and as we reached the top, and looked down on the new world before us, I hardly knew whether most to rejoice that
We had just one ridge left to cross, and as we reached the top and looked down at the new world before us, I could hardly tell whether to feel more joy that
“All the toil of the long-pass’d way”
“All the hard work of the long-gone journey”
was over, or to regret that our mountain journey was drawing to a close.
was over, or to wish that our mountain trip wasn't ending.
The novelty of my enjoyment had doubtless added much to its keenness. I have never been familiar with mountain scenery. Wales has shewn me all I ever saw, and the region of the Alleghany Alps in no way resembles it. It is a world of mountains rising around you in every direction, and in every form; savage, vast, and wild; yet almost at every step, some lovely spot meets your eye, green, bright and blooming, as the most cherished nook belonging to some noble Flora in our own beautiful land. It is a ride of ninety miles through kalmies, rhododendrons, azalias, vines and roses; sheltered from every blast that blows by vast masses of various coloured rocks, on which
The newness of my enjoyment had definitely heightened its intensity. I’ve never really experienced mountain scenery before. Wales has shown me everything I’ve ever seen, and the area of the Alleghany Alps is nothing like it. It’s a world of mountains rising around you in every direction and in every shape; rugged, immense, and untamed; yet almost at every turn, some beautiful spot catches your eye, green, bright, and blooming, like the most beloved corner belonging to some noble Flora in our lovely land. It's a ninety-mile ride through calm spots, rhododendrons, azaleas, vines, and roses; protected from every gust that blows by huge masses of various-colored rocks, on which
“Tall pines and cedars wave their dark green crests.”
“Tall pines and cedars sway their dark green tops.”
while in every direction you have a background of blue mountain tops, that play at bo-peep with you in the clouds.
while in every direction you have a backdrop of blue mountain peaks, that peek at you through the clouds.
After descending the last ridge we reached Haggerstown, a small neat place, between a town and a village; and here by the piety of the Presbyterian coach-masters, we were doomed to pass an entire day, and two nights, “as the accommodation line must not run on the sabbath.”
After going down the last ridge, we arrived in Haggerstown, a tidy little spot that felt like a mix between a town and a village. Thanks to the strict nature of the Presbyterian coach drivers, we were stuck here for a whole day and two nights because “the accommodation line can’t operate on Sundays.”
I must, however, mention, that this day of enforced rest was not Sunday. Saturday evening we had taken in at Cumberland a portly passenger, whom we soon discovered to be one of the proprietors of the coach. He asked us, with great politeness, if we should wish to travel on the sabbath, or to delay our journey. We answered that we would rather proceed; “The coach, then, shall go on tomorrow,” replied the liberal coach-master, with the greatest courtesy; and accordingly we travelled all Sunday, and arrived at Haggerstown on Sunday night. At the door of the inn our civil proprietor left us; but when we enquired of the waiter at what hour we were to start on the morrow, he told us that we should be obliged to pass the whole of Monday there, as the coach which was to convey us forward would not arrive from the east, till Tuesday morning.
I should mention, though, that this day off was not Sunday. Saturday night, we picked up a hefty passenger in Cumberland, who we soon found out was one of the coach owners. He politely asked us if we wanted to travel on Sunday or postpone our trip. We replied that we’d prefer to continue; “Then the coach will go on tomorrow,” said the generous coach owner, very courteously. So, we traveled all Sunday and got to Hagerstown that night. Our polite host left us at the inn, but when we asked the waiter what time we were set to leave the next day, he told us we’d have to stay the entire Monday there because the coach to take us further wouldn’t arrive from the east until Tuesday morning.
Thus we discovered that the waiving the sabbath-keeping by the proprietor, was for his own convenience, and not for ours, and that we were to be tied by the leg for four-and-twenty hours notwithstanding. This was quite a Yankee trick.
Thus we discovered that the proprietor's decision to waive Sabbath-keeping was for his own convenience, not ours, and that we would still be stuck for twenty-four hours regardless. This was quite a clever trick.
Luckily for us, the inn at Haggerstown was one of the most comfortable I ever entered. It was there that we became fully aware that we had left Western America behind us. Instead of being scolded, as we literally were at Cincinnati, for asking for a private sitting-room, we here had two, without asking at all. A waiter, quite comme il faut, summoned us to breakfast, dinner, and tea, which we found prepared with abundance, and even elegance. The master of the house met us at the door of the eating-room, and, after asking if we wished for any thing not on the table, retired. The charges were in no respect higher than at Cincinnati.
Luckily for us, the inn at Haggerstown was one of the most comfortable places I had ever entered. It was there that we realized we had truly left Western America behind. Instead of being reprimanded, as we were in Cincinnati, for wanting a private sitting room, we had two here without even asking. A waiter, quite proper, called us to breakfast, lunch, and tea, which were beautifully prepared with plenty of food and even elegance. The owner greeted us at the entrance to the dining room and, after asking if we needed anything not on the table, stepped back. The prices were in no way higher than in Cincinnati.
A considerable creek, called Conococheque Creek, runs near the town, and the valley through which it passes is said to be the most fertile in America.
A significant creek, known as Conococheque Creek, flows close to the town, and the valley it travels through is said to be the most fertile in America.
On leaving Haggerstown we found, to our mortification, that we were not to be the sole occupants of the bulky accommodation, two ladies and two gentlemen appearing at the door ready to share it with us. We again started, at four o’clock, by the light of a bright moon, and rumbled and nodded through the roads considerably worse than those over the mountains.
On leaving Haggerstown, we were embarrassed to find that we wouldn't be the only ones in the spacious accommodation; two ladies and two gentlemen showed up at the door, ready to join us. We set off again at four o'clock, under the glow of a bright moon, and bumped along on roads that were much worse than those over the mountains.
As the light began to dawn we discovered our ladies to be an old woman and her pretty daughter.
As the light started to break, we found that our companions were an elderly woman and her attractive daughter.
Soon after daylight we found that our pace became much slower than usual, and that from time to time our driver addressed to his companion on the box many and vehement exclamations. The gentlemen put their heads out, to ask what was the matter, but could get no intelligence, till the mail overtook us, when both vehicles stopped, and an animated colloquy of imprecations took place between the coachmen. At length we learnt that one of our wheels was broken in such a manner as to render it impossible for us to proceed. Upon this the old lady immediately became a principal actor in the scene. She sprung to the window, and addressing the set of gentlemen who completely filled the mail, exclaimed “Gentlemen! can’t you make room for two? only me and my daughter?” The naive simplicity of this request set both the coaches into an uproar of laughter. It was impossible to doubt that she acted upon the same principle as the pious Catholic, who addressing heaven with a prayer for himself alone, added “pour ne pas fatiguer ta miséricorde.” Our laugh, however, never daunted the old woman, or caused her for a moment to cease the reiteration of her request, “only for two of us, gentlemen! can’t you find room for two?”
Soon after daylight, we realized that our pace had slowed down significantly, and our driver occasionally shouted animated remarks to his companion on the box. The gentlemen leaned out to ask what was wrong but couldn't get any information until the mail caught up with us. Both vehicles came to a stop, and an animated exchange of curses took place between the coachmen. Eventually, we found out that one of our wheels was broken in a way that made it impossible for us to continue. At that point, the old lady became a key player in the situation. She jumped to the window and called out to the gentlemen who completely filled the mail, saying, “Gentlemen! Can’t you make room for two? Just me and my daughter?” The naive simplicity of her request sent both coaches into an uproar of laughter. It was clear she was acting on the same principle as the devout Catholic who, praying only for himself, added “pour ne pas fatiguer ta miséricorde.” However, our laughter didn't faze the old woman at all; she kept repeating her request, “Only for two of us, gentlemen! Can’t you find room for two?”
Our situation was really very embarrassing, but not to laugh was impossible. After it was ascertained that our own vehicle could not convey us, and that the mail had not even room for two, we decided upon walking to the next village, a distance, fortunately, of only two miles, and awaiting there the repair of the wheel. We immediately set off, at the brisk pace that six o’clock and a frosty morning in March were likely to inspire, leaving our old lady and her pretty daughter considerably in the rear; our hearts having been rather hardened by the exclusive nature of her prayer for aid.
Our situation was incredibly awkward, yet it was impossible not to laugh. After figuring out that our vehicle couldn’t take us and that the mail carriage had no extra room for two, we decided to walk to the next village, luckily only two miles away, and wait there for the wheel to be fixed. We immediately set off at a quick pace, inspired by the six o’clock hour and the chilly March morning, leaving the elderly lady and her attractive daughter quite far behind; our hearts had been somewhat hardened by her selfish prayer for help.
When we had again started upon our new wheel, the driver, to recover the time he had lost, drove rapidly over a very rough road, in consequence of which, our self-seeking old lady fell into a perfect agony of terror, and her cries of “we shall be over! oh, Lord! we shall be over! we must over! we shall be over!” lasted to the end of the stage which with laughing, walking, and shaking, was a most fatiguing one.
When we started our new journey, the driver, trying to make up for lost time, sped over a very bumpy road. Because of this, our selfish old lady was completely terrified, and her screams of “We’re going to tip over! Oh, no! We’re going to tip over! We have to tip over! We’re going to tip over!” continued all the way to the end of the route, which was quite exhausting with all the laughing, walking, and bouncing around.
CHAPTER XIX
Baltimore—Catholic Cathedral—St. Mary’s—College Sermons—Infant School
Baltimore—Catholic Cathedral—St. Mary’s—College Sermons—Preschool
As we advanced towards Baltimore the look of cultivation increased, the fences wore an air of greater neatness, the houses began to look like the abodes of competence and comfort, and we were consoled for the loss of the beautiful mountains by knowing that we were approaching the Atlantic.
As we moved closer to Baltimore, the signs of farming became more apparent, the fences looked tidier, the houses started to resemble comfortable and well-kept homes, and we felt better about leaving the beautiful mountains behind since we knew we were getting closer to the Atlantic.
From the time of quitting the Ohio river, though, unquestionably, it merits its title of “the beautiful,” especially when compared with the dreary Mississippi, I strongly felt the truth of an observation I remembered to have heard in England, that little rivers were more beautiful than great ones. As features in a landscape, this is assuredly the case. Where the stream is so wide that the objects on the opposite shore are indistinct, all the beauty must be derived from the water itself; whereas, when the stream is narrow, it becomes only a part of the composition. The Monongahela, which is in size between the Wye and the Thames, is infinitely more picturesque than the Ohio.
From the moment we left the Ohio River, it clearly deserves its title of “the beautiful,” especially when you compare it to the dull Mississippi. I really felt the truth of something I once heard in England: that smaller rivers are often more beautiful than larger ones. This is definitely true when you think about it in terms of landscapes. If a river is so wide that you can't make out the things on the other side, all the beauty has to come from the water itself. But when the river is narrow, it becomes just one part of the whole picture. The Monongahela, which is smaller than the Ohio but larger than the Wye and the Thames, is way more picturesque than the Ohio.
To enjoy the beauty of the vast rivers of this vast country you must be upon the water; and then the power of changing the scenery by now approaching one shore, and now the other, is very pleasing; but travelling as we now did, by land, the wild, rocky, narrow, rapid little rivers we encountered, were a thousand times more beautiful. The Potapsco, near which the road runs, as you approach Baltimore, is at many points very picturesque. The large blocks of grey rock, now close upon its edge, and now retiring to give room for a few acres of bright green herbage, give great interest and variety to its course.
To appreciate the beauty of the expansive rivers in this large country, you need to be on the water; the ability to change the scenery by moving closer to one shore and then the other is very enjoyable. However, traveling by land, the wild, rocky, narrow, and fast-flowing little rivers we saw were a thousand times more beautiful. The Potapsco, which the road runs alongside as you approach Baltimore, is quite picturesque in many places. The large gray rock formations, sometimes right at the water's edge and sometimes pulled back to create space for patches of bright green grass, add great interest and variety to its course.
Baltimore is, I think, one of the handsomest cities to approach in the Union. The noble column erected to the memory of Washington, and the Catholic Cathedral, with its beautiful dome, being built on a commanding eminence, are seen at a great distance. As you draw nearer, many other domes and towers become visible, and as you enter Baltimore-street, you feel that you are arrived in a handsome and populous city.
Baltimore is, I believe, one of the most beautiful cities to approach in the country. The impressive monument dedicated to Washington and the Catholic Cathedral, with its stunning dome, stand out from a distance on a high point. As you get closer, you can see many other domes and towers, and once you enter Baltimore Street, you realize that you've arrived in a vibrant and bustling city.
We took up our quarters at an excellent hotel, where the coach stopped, and the next day were fortunate enough to find accommodation in the house of a lady, well known to many of my European friends. With her and her amiable daughter, we spent a fortnight very agreeably, and felt quite aware that if we had not arrived in London or Paris, we had, at least, left far behind the “half-horse, half-alligator” tribes of the West, as the Kentuckians call themselves.
We settled in at a great hotel where the coach dropped us off, and the next day we were lucky enough to find a place to stay with a lady who is well-known to many of my European friends. We spent a delightful two weeks with her and her charming daughter, and we were very aware that even though we hadn't reached London or Paris, we had definitely left behind the “half-horse, half-alligator” tribes of the West, as the Kentuckians like to call themselves.
Baltimore is in many respects a beautiful city; it has several handsome buildings, and even the private dwelling-houses have a look of magnificence, from the abundance of white marble with which many of them are adorned. The ample flights of steps, and the lofty door frames, are in most of the best houses formed of this beautiful material.
Baltimore is, in many ways, a beautiful city; it has several stunning buildings, and even the private homes have an air of grandeur, thanks to the abundance of white marble that many of them are decorated with. The wide staircases and tall door frames in most of the finest houses are made from this lovely material.
This has been called the city of monuments, from its having the stately column erected to the memory of General Washington, and which bears a colossal statue of him at the top; and another pillar of less dimensions, recording some victory; I forget which. Both these are of brilliant white marble. There are also several pretty marble fountains in different parts of the city, which greatly add to its beauty. These are not, it is true, quite so splendid as that of the Innocents, or many others at Paris, but they are fountains of clear water, and they are built of white marble. There is one which is sheltered from the sun by a roof supported by light columns; it looks like a temple dedicated to the genius of the spring. The water flows into a marble cistern, to which you descend by a flight of steps of delicate whiteness, and return by another. These steps are never without groups of negro girls, some carrying the water on their heads, with that graceful steadiness of step, which requires no aid from the hand; some tripping gaily with their yet unfilled pitchers; many of them singing in the soft rich voice, peculiar to their race; and all dressed with that strict attention to taste and smartness, which seems the distinguishing characteristic of the Baltimore females of all ranks.
This city is known as the city of monuments because of its impressive column dedicated to General Washington, topped with a huge statue of him. There’s also a smaller pillar commemorating a victory, though I can’t remember which one. Both are made of brilliant white marble. Additionally, there are several beautiful marble fountains scattered throughout the city, enhancing its charm. While these might not be as grand as the one at the Innocents or many others in Paris, they still feature clear water and are constructed from white marble. One fountain is shaded from the sun by a roof held up by slender columns; it resembles a temple dedicated to the spirit of spring. Water flows into a marble basin, which you can access by descending a staircase of delicate white, and then ascending another. These steps are often filled with groups of Black girls, some carrying water on their heads with a graceful steadiness that doesn’t require their hands, while others skip happily with their empty pitchers. Many of them sing with the soft, rich voices typical of their heritage, and all are dressed with the care and style that seems to define Baltimore women of all backgrounds.
The Catholic Cathedral is considered by all Americans as a magnificent church, but it can hardly be so classed by any one who has seen the churches of Europe; its interior, however, has an air of neatness that amounts to elegance. The form is a Greek cross, having a dome in the centre; but the proportions are ill- preserved; the dome is too low, and the arches which support it are flattened, and too wide for their height. On each side of the high altar are chapels to the Saviour and the Virgin. The altars in these, as well as the high altar, are of native marble of different colours, and some of the specimens are very beautiful. The decorations of the altar are elegant and costly. The prelate is a cardinal, and bears, moreover, the title of “Archbishop of Baltimore.”
The Catholic Cathedral is regarded by all Americans as an impressive church, but anyone who has seen the churches in Europe would think otherwise; its interior, however, has a level of neatness that comes off as elegant. The design is shaped like a Greek cross, with a dome in the center, but the proportions are poorly maintained; the dome is too low, and the arches supporting it are flattened and too wide for their height. On either side of the high altar are chapels dedicated to the Savior and the Virgin. The altars in these chapels, as well as the high altar, are made of native marble in various colors, and some of the pieces are quite beautiful. The altar decorations are elegant and expensive. The prelate is a cardinal and also holds the title of “Archbishop of Baltimore.”
There are several paintings in different parts of the church, which we heard were considered as very fine. There are two presented by Louis XVIII; one of these is the Descent from the Cross, by Paulin Guirin; the other a copy from Rubens, (as they told us) of a legend of St. Louis in the Holy Land; but the composition of the picture is so abominably bad, that I conceive the legend of its being after Rubens, must be as fabulous as its subject. The admiration in which these pictures are held, is an incontestable indication of the state of art in the country.
There are several paintings in various parts of the church, which we heard are considered quite impressive. Two are provided by Louis XVIII; one is the Descent from the Cross, by Paulin Guirin; the other is a copy of a Rubens painting (as we were told) depicting a story of St. Louis in the Holy Land. However, the composition of the picture is so terribly done that I believe the claim of it being after Rubens is as mythical as its subject. The level of admiration these paintings receive clearly shows the state of art in the country.
We attended mass in this church the Sunday after our arrival, and I was perfectly astonished at the beauty and splendid appearance of the ladies who filled it. Excepting on a very brilliant Sunday at the Tuilleries, I never saw so shewy a display of morning costume, and I think I never saw any where so many beautiful women at one glance. They all appeared to be in full dress, and were really all beautiful.
We went to church for mass the Sunday after we arrived, and I was completely amazed by the beauty and stunning looks of the women who were there. Aside from a really fancy Sunday at the Tuileries, I’ve never seen such a flashy display of morning outfits, and I don't think I've ever seen so many beautiful women all at once. They all seemed to be dressed to the nines and truly were all gorgeous.
The sermon (I am very attentive to sermons) was a most extraordinary one. The priest began by telling us, that he was about to preach upon a vice that he would not “mention or name” from the beginning of his sermon to the end.
The sermon (I really pay attention to sermons) was truly remarkable. The priest started by saying that he was going to talk about a vice that he wouldn’t “mention or name” from the start of his sermon to the finish.
Having thus excited the curiosity of his hearers, by proposing a riddle to them, he began.
Having sparked the curiosity of his listeners by presenting them with a riddle, he started.
Adam, he said, was most assuredly the first who had committed this sin, and Cain the next; then, following the advice given by the listener, in the Plaideurs, “Passons au deluge, je vous prie;” he went on to mention the particular propriety of Noah’s family on this point; and then continued, “Now observe, what did God shew the greatest dislike to? What was it that Jesus was never even accused of? What was it Joseph hated the most? Who was the disciple that Jesus chose for his friend?” and thus he went on for nearly an hour, in a strain that was often perfectly unintelligible to me, but which, as far as I could comprehend it, appeared to be a sort of expose and commentary upon private anecdotes which he had found, or fancied he had found in the Bible. I never saw the attention of a congregation more strongly excited, and I really wished, in Christian charity, that something better had rewarded it.
Adam, he said, was definitely the first to commit this sin, and Cain was next; then, following the advice given by the listener in the Plaideurs, “Let’s move on to the flood, please;” he went on to point out the particular relevance of Noah’s family on this topic; and then continued, “Now notice, what did God show the greatest dislike for? What was it that Jesus was never even accused of? What did Joseph hate the most? Who was the disciple that Jesus chose as his friend?” He kept going for nearly an hour, in a way that was often completely unclear to me, but which, as much as I could understand, seemed to be a sort of analysis and commentary on personal stories he had found, or thought he had found, in the Bible. I had never seen a congregation’s attention so strongly captured, and I genuinely wished, out of Christian compassion, that something better had come of it.
There are a vast number of churches and chapels in the city, in proportion to its extent, and several that are large and well- built; the Unitarian church is the handsomest I have ever seen dedicated to that mode of worship. But the prettiest among them is a little bijou of a thing belonging to the Catholic college. The institution is dedicated to St. Mary, but this little chapel looks, though in the midst of a city, as if it should have been sacred to St. John of the wilderness. There is a sequestered little garden behind it, hardly large enough to plant cabbages in, which yet contains a Mount Calvary, bearing a lofty cross. The tiny path which leads up to this sacred spot, is not much wider than a sheep-track, and its cedars are but shrubs, but all is in proportion; and notwithstanding its fairy dimensions, there is something of holiness, and quiet beauty about it, that excites the imagination strangely. The little chapel itself has the same touching and impressive character. A solitary lamp, whose glare is tempered by delicately painted glass, hangs before the altar. The light of day enters dimly, yet richly, through crimson curtains, and the silence with which the well-lined doors opened from time to time, admitting a youth of the establishment, who, with noiseless tread, approached the altar, and kneeling, offered a whispered prayer, and retired, had something in it more calculated, perhaps, to generate holy thoughts, than even the swelling anthem heard beneath the resounding dome of St. Peter’s.
There are a lot of churches and chapels in the city, especially considering its size, and several are large and well-built; the Unitarian church is the most beautiful one I've ever seen for that type of worship. But the prettiest of all is a charming little place belonging to the Catholic college. The institution is dedicated to St. Mary, but this little chapel seems like it should be dedicated to St. John of the wilderness, despite being in the middle of the city. There’s a small, secluded garden behind it, barely big enough to plant cabbages, but it still features a Mount Calvary with a tall cross. The narrow path leading up to this sacred spot is not much wider than a sheep track, and the cedars are more like shrubs, but everything feels right; and despite its fairy-tale size, there’s something holy and quietly beautiful about it that stirs the imagination. The little chapel itself has the same touching and impressive quality. A solitary lamp, its brightness softened by beautifully painted glass, hangs above the altar. Daylight filters in softly through crimson curtains, and the silence with which the well-lined doors occasionally opened, allowing a youth from the college to enter silently, approach the altar, kneel, offer a whispered prayer, and leave, had something that perhaps inspires holy thoughts even more than the grand anthems echoing under the dome of St. Peter’s.
Baltimore has a handsome museum, superintended by one of the Peale family, well known for their devotion to natural science, and to works of art. It is not their fault if the specimens which they are enabled to display in the latter department are very inferior to their splendid exhibitions in the former.
Baltimore has a beautiful museum, managed by a member of the Peale family, who are well-known for their dedication to natural science and art. It's not their fault that the items they showcase in the art section are much lower in quality compared to their amazing displays in natural science.
The theatre was closed when we were in Baltimore, but we were told that it was very far from being a popular or fashionable amusement. We were, indeed, told this every where throughout the country, and the information was generally accompanied by the observation, that the opposition of the clergy was the cause of it. But I suspect that this is not the principal cause, especially among the men, who, if they were so implicit in their obedience to the clergy, would certainly be more constant in their attendance at the churches; nor would they, moreover, deem the theatre more righteous because an English actor, or a French dancer, performed there; yet on such occasions the theatres overflow. The cause, I think, is in the character of the people. I never saw a population so totally divested of gaiety; there is no trace of this feeling from one end of the Union to the other. They have no fêtes, no fairs, no merry makings, no music in the streets, no Punch, no puppet-shows. If they see a comedy or a farce, they may laugh at it; but they can do very well without it; and the consciousness of the number of cents that must be paid to enter a theatre, I am very sure turns more steps from its door than any religious feeling. A distinguished publisher of Philadelphia told me that no comic publication had ever yet been found to answer in America.
The theater was closed when we were in Baltimore, but we were told it wasn’t very popular or trendy. In fact, we heard this all over the country, usually with the comment that the opposition from religious leaders was the reason for it. However, I suspect that's not the main reason, especially among men who, if they were so obedient to the clergy, would definitely attend church more regularly; nor would they think the theater was any better just because an English actor or a French dancer was performing there; yet on those occasions, theaters are packed. I think the reason lies in the character of the people. I've never seen a population so completely lacking in cheerfulness; there’s no sign of this feeling from one end of the country to the other. They don’t have festivals, fairs, celebrations, street music, Punch and Judy shows, or puppetry. If they watch a comedy or a farce, they might laugh, but they can easily live without it; and I’m sure the awareness of the admission fee keeps more people away than any religious sentiment. A well-known publisher in Philadelphia told me that no comic publication has ever succeeded in America.
We arrived at Baltimore at the season of the “Conference.” I must be excused from giving any very distinct explanation of this term, as I did not receive any. From what I could learn, it much resembles a Revival. We entered many churches, and heard much preaching, and not one of the reverend orators could utter the reproach,
We got to Baltimore during the "Conference" season. I can't really explain what this term means because I never got an explanation myself. From what I gathered, it’s similar to a Revival. We visited many churches and listened to a lot of preaching, and not one of the preachers could express the criticism,
“Peut-on si bien precher qu’elle ne dorme au sermon?”
“Can one preach so well that she doesn't sleep during the sermon?”
for I never even dosed at any. There was one preacher whose manner and matter were so peculiar, that I took the liberty of immediately writing down a part of his discourse as a specimen. I confess I began writing in the middle of a sentence, for I waited in vain for a beginning. It was as follows:-
for I never even dozed off at any. There was one preacher whose style and content were so unique that I took the liberty of writing down a part of his sermon as an example. I admit I started writing in the middle of a sentence because I waited in vain for a beginning. It was as follows:-
“Nevertheless, we must not lose sight of the one important, great, and only object; for the Lord is mighty, his works are great, likewise wonderful, likewise wise, likewise merciful; and, moreover, we must ever keep in mind, and close to our hearts, all his precious blessings, and unspeakable mercies, and overflowings; and moreover we must never lose sight of, no, never lose sight of, nor ever cease to remember, nor ever let our souls forget, nor ever cease to dwell upon, and to reverence, and to welcome, and to bless, and to give thanks, and to sing hosanna, and give praise,”—and here my fragment of paper failed, but this strain continued, without a shadow of meaning that I could trace, and in a voice inconceivably loud, for more than an hour. After he had finished his sermon, a scene exactly resembling that at the Cincinnati Revival, took place. Two other priests assisted in calling forward the people, and in whispering comfort to them. One of these men roared out in the coarsest accents, “Do you want to go to hell tonight?” The church was almost entirely filled with women, who vied with each other in howlings and contortions of the body; many of them tore their clothes nearly off. I was much amused, spite of the indignation and disgust the scene inspired, by the vehemence of the negro part of the congregation; they seemed determined to bellow louder than all the rest, to shew at once their piety and their equality.
“Nevertheless, we must not lose sight of the one important, great, and only goal; for the Lord is powerful, His works are amazing, truly wonderful, wise, and merciful; plus, we must always remember and hold close to our hearts all His precious blessings, unspeakable mercies, and abundance; and furthermore, we must never forget, no, never forget, nor cease to remember, nor allow our souls to forget, nor stop dwelling on, revering, welcoming, blessing, giving thanks, singing praises, and giving glory,”—and here my piece of paper ran out, but this flow continued, without any meaning that I could follow, and in an unbelievably loud voice for more than an hour. After he finished his sermon, a scene just like the one at the Cincinnati Revival unfolded. Two other priests helped in calling people forward and whispering comfort to them. One of these men shouted in the coarsest tone, “Do you want to go to hell tonight?” The church was almost entirely filled with women, who competed with each other in howling and contorting their bodies; many of them nearly tore their clothes off. I found it quite amusing, despite the indignation and disgust the scene inspired, to see the fervor of the black part of the congregation; they seemed determined to yell louder than everyone else to demonstrate both their piety and their equality.
At this same chapel, a few nights before, a woman had fallen in a fit of ecstasy from the gallery, into the arms of the people below, a height of twelve feet. A young slave who waited upon us at table, when this was mentioned, said, that similar accidents had frequently happened, and that once she had seen it herself. Another slave in the house told us, that she “liked religion right well, but that she never took fits in it, ’cause she was always fixed in her best, when she went to chapel, and she did not like to have all her best clothes broke up.”
At the same chapel a few nights before, a woman had fallen into a fit of ecstasy from the gallery, plunging twelve feet into the arms of the crowd below. A young servant who was waiting on us at the table mentioned that similar incidents had happened often, and that she had witnessed it herself once. Another servant in the house said that she “really liked religion, but she never had fits in it because she always dressed in her best when going to chapel, and she didn’t want to ruin her nice clothes.”
We visited the infant school, instituted in this city by Mr. Ibbertson, an amiable and intelligent Englishman. It was the first infant school, properly so called, which I had ever seen, and I was greatly pleased with all the arrangements, and the apparent success of them. The children, of whom we saw about a hundred, boys and girls, were between eighteen months and six years. The apartment was filled with all sorts of instructive and amusing objects; a set of Dutch toys, arranged as a cabinet of natural history, was excellent; a numerous collection of large wooden bricks filled one corner of the room; the walls were hung with gay papers of different patterns, each representing some pretty group of figures; large and excellent coloured engravings of birds and beasts were exhibited in succession as the theme of a little lesson; and the sweet flute of Mr. Ibbertson gave tune and time to the prettiest little concert of chirping birds that I ever listened to.
We visited the infant school established in this city by Mr. Ibbertson, a kind and intelligent Englishman. It was the first proper infant school I had ever seen, and I was really impressed with all the arrangements and how successful they seemed. We saw about a hundred children, boys and girls, ranging from eighteen months to six years old. The room was filled with all kinds of fun and educational items; a set of Dutch toys, arranged like a natural history cabinet, was excellent; a large collection of big wooden blocks filled one corner; the walls were decorated with bright paper in various patterns, each showing a lovely scene; large and beautiful colored prints of birds and animals were displayed as the focus of a little lesson; and the sweet sound of Mr. Ibbertson’s flute provided the melody for the cutest little concert of chirping birds I’ve ever heard.
A geographical model, large enough to give clear ideas of continent, island, cape, isthmus, et cetera, all set in water, is placed before the children, and the pretty creatures point their little rosy fingers with a look of intense interest, as they are called upon to shew where each of them is to be found. The dress, both of boys and girls, was elegantly neat, and their manner, when called upon to speak individually, was well-bred, intelligent, and totally free from the rude indifference, which is so remarkably prevalent in the manners of American children. Mr. Ibbertson will be benefactor to the Union, if he become the means of spreading the admirable method by which he had polished the manner, and awakened the intellect of these beautiful little Republicans. I have conversed with many American ladies on the total want of discipline and subjection which I observed universally among children of all ages, and I never found any who did not both acknowledge and deplore the truth of the remark. In the state of Ohio they have a law (I know not if it exist elsewhere), that if a father strike his son, he shall pay a fine of ten dollars for every such offence. I was told by a gentleman of Cincinnati, that he had seen this fine inflicted there, at the requisition of a boy of twelve years of age, whose father, he proved, had struck him for lying. Such a law, they say, generates a spirit of freedom. What else may it generate?
A geographical model, big enough to clearly show continents, islands, capes, isthmuses, and so on, all surrounded by water, is placed in front of the children. The cute little kids point their tiny rosy fingers with a look of great interest as they are asked to show where each of these features can be found. The boys' and girls' outfits were elegantly neat, and their demeanor when called to speak individually was polite, intelligent, and completely free from the rude indifference that's so common among American kids. Mr. Ibbertson will be a benefactor to the Union if he helps spread the excellent method he used to refine the behavior and stimulate the minds of these charming little Republicans. I’ve talked to many American women about the complete lack of discipline and control I observed among children of all ages, and I’ve never met anyone who didn’t acknowledge and regret this truth. In Ohio, they have a law (I'm not sure if it exists elsewhere) that if a father hits his son, he has to pay a fine of ten dollars for each offense. A gentleman from Cincinnati told me that he saw this fine imposed there at the request of a twelve-year-old boy, whose father he proved had hit him for lying. They say such a law creates a spirit of freedom. What else might it create?
Mr. Ibbertson, who seems perfectly devoted, heart and head to the subject, told me that he was employed in organizing successive schools that should receive the pupils as they advanced in age. If he prove himself as capable of completing education, as he appears to be of beginning it, his institution will be a very valuable one. It would, indeed, be valuable any where; but in America, where discipline is not, where, from the shell, they are beings “that cannot rule, nor ever will be ruled,” it is invaluable.
Mr. Ibbertson, who seems completely dedicated, both heart and mind, to the topic, told me that he was working on setting up a series of schools that would take in students as they got older. If he can show he’s as good at finishing education as he is at starting it, his institution will be really valuable. It would be valuable anywhere, but in America, where discipline is lacking, and where, from the start, they are individuals “that cannot rule, nor ever will be ruled,” it is priceless.
About two miles from Baltimore is a fort, nobly situated on the Patapsco, and commanding the approach from the Chesapeak bay. As our visit was on a Sunday we were not permitted to enter it. The walk to this fort is along a fine terrace of beautiful verdure, which commands a magnificent view of the city, with its columns, towers, domes, and shipping; and also of the Patapsco river, which is here so wide as to present almost a sea view. This terrace is ornamented with abundance of evergreens, and wild roses innumerable, but, the whole region has the reputation of being unhealthy, and the fort itself most lamentably so. Before leaving the city of monuments, I must not omit naming one reared to the growing wealth of the country; Mr. Barham’s hotel is said to be the most splendid in the Union, and it is certainly splendid enough for a people more luxurious than the citizens of the republic appear yet to be. I heard different, and, indeed, perfectly contradictory accounts of the success of the experiment; but at least every one seemed to agree that the liberal projector was fully entitled to exclaim,
About two miles from Baltimore, there's a fort positioned beautifully on the Patapsco River, overseeing the approach from the Chesapeake Bay. Since our visit was on a Sunday, we weren’t allowed to enter. The walk to the fort is along a lovely path lined with beautiful greenery, offering a stunning view of the city, with its columns, towers, domes, and ships, as well as the Patapsco River, which is so wide here it looks almost like a sea. This path is decorated with plenty of evergreens and countless wild roses, but the whole area is known to be unhealthy, and unfortunately, the fort itself is particularly so. Before leaving the city of monuments, I must mention one erected to the growing wealth of the country; Mr. Barham’s hotel is said to be the most magnificent in the nation, and it certainly seems luxurious enough for a people who haven't yet reached the level of extravagance typical of the citizens of the republic. I heard various, even completely contradictory, stories about the success of this venture; but at least everyone seemed to agree that the generous founder was completely justified in exclaiming,
“’Tis not in mortals to command success;
I have done more, Jonathan, I’ve deserved it.”
“It’s not up to humans to guarantee success;
I have done more, Jonathan, I’ve earned it.”
After enjoying a very pleasant fortnight, the greater part of which was passed in rambling about this pretty city and its environs, we left it, not without regret, and all indulging the hope that we should be able to pay it another visit.
After having a great two weeks, most of which we spent wandering around this lovely city and its surroundings, we left it with some sadness, all hoping we could come back for another visit.
CHAPTER XX
Voyage to Washington—Capitol—City of Washington—Congress—Indians—Funeral of a Member of Congress
Voyage to Washington—Capitol—City of Washington—Congress—Indians—Funeral of a Congress Member
By far the shortest route to Washington, both as to distance and time, is by land; but I much wished to see the celebrated Chesapeak bay, and it was therefore decided that we should take our passage in the steam-boat. It is indeed a beautiful little voyage, and well worth the time it costs; but as to the beauty of the bay, it must, I think, be felt only by sailors. It is, I doubt not, a fine shelter for ships, from the storms of the Atlantic, but its very vastness prevents its striking the eye as beautiful: it is, in fact, only a fine sea view. But the entrance from it into the Potomac river is very noble, and is one of the points at which one feels conscious of the gigantic proportions of the country, without having recourse to a graduated pencil-case.
The quickest way to Washington, both in terms of distance and time, is by land; however, I really wanted to see the famous Chesapeake Bay, so we decided to take a steam boat. It’s a lovely little trip and definitely worth the time it takes; but as for the beauty of the bay, I think it can only be truly appreciated by sailors. I’m sure it provides great shelter for ships from Atlantic storms, but its sheer size makes it hard to see as beautiful: it’s really just a nice view of the sea. However, the entrance into the Potomac River is quite impressive, and it’s one of those moments when you really feel the vastness of the country, without needing a measuring tool.
The passage up this river to Washington is interesting, from many objects that it passes, but beyond all else, by the view it affords of Mount Vernon, the seat of General Washington. It is there that this truly great man passed the last years of his virtuous life, and it is there that he lies buried: it was easy to distinguish, as we passed, the cypress that waves over his grave.
The trip up the river to Washington is fascinating, with many things to see along the way, but above all, the view of Mount Vernon, the home of General Washington, is the highlight. This truly great man spent the last years of his honorable life there, and he is buried there as well; it was easy to spot the cypress tree that stands over his grave as we passed by.
The latter part of the voyage shews some fine river scenery; but I did not discover this till some months afterwards, for we now arrived late at night.
The latter part of the trip reveals some beautiful river scenery, but I didn't notice this until several months later, since we arrived late at night.
Our first object the next morning was to get a sight of the capitol, and our impatience sent us forth before breakfast. The mists of morning still hung around this magnificent building when first it broke upon our view, and I am not sure that the effect produced was not the greater for this circumstance. At all events, we were struck with admiration and surprise. None of us, I believe, expected to see so imposing a structure on that side of the Atlantic. I am ill at describing buildings, but the beauty and majesty of the American capitol might defy an abler pen than mine to do it justice. It stands so finely too, high, and alone.
Our first goal the next morning was to catch a glimpse of the Capitol, and our excitement drove us out before breakfast. The morning mist still lingered around this stunning building when we finally saw it, and I think the effect was even more impressive because of that. In any case, we were filled with admiration and surprise. I don’t think any of us expected to see such an impressive structure on this side of the Atlantic. I'm not great at describing buildings, but the beauty and grandeur of the American Capitol would challenge even a more skilled writer to capture it. It stands so magnificently, tall and solitary.
The magnificent western facade is approached from the city by terraces and steps of bolder proportions than I ever before saw. The elegant eastern front, to which many persons give the preference, is on a level with a newly-planted but exceedingly handsome inclosure, which, in a few years, will offer the shade of all the most splendid trees which flourish in the Union, to cool the brows and refresh the spirits of the members. The view from the capitol commands the city and many miles around, and it is itself an object of imposing beauty to the whole country adjoining.
The stunning western facade is accessed from the city by wide terraces and steps that are larger than anything I've seen before. The graceful eastern front, which many people prefer, aligns with a newly-planted but very attractive area that will, in a few years, provide the shade of some of the most magnificent trees found in the country, cooling the brows and lifting the spirits of the members. The view from the capitol overlooks the city and far beyond, and it is itself a sight of breathtaking beauty for the entire surrounding area.
We were again fortunate enough to find a very agreeable family to board with; and soon after breakfast left our comfortless hotel near the water, for very pleasant apartments in F. street.[7]
We were lucky to find a really nice family to stay with again; and soon after breakfast, we left our uncomfortable hotel near the water for some lovely rooms on F. street.[7]
[7] The streets that intersect the great avenues in Washington are distinguished by the letters of the alphabet.
[7] The streets that cross the major avenues in Washington are named with letters of the alphabet.
I was delighted with the whole aspect of Washington; light, cheerful, and airy, it reminded me of our fashionable watering places. It has been laughed at by foreigners, and even by natives, because the original plan of the city was upon an enormous scale, and but a very small part of it has been as yet executed. But I confess I see nothing in the least degree ridiculous about it; the original design, which was as beautiful as it was extensive, has been in no way departed from, and all that has been done has been done well. From the base of the hill on which the capitol stands extends a street of most magnificent width, planted on each side with trees, and ornamented by many splendid shops. This street, which is called Pennsylvania Avenue, is above a mile in length, and at the end of it is the handsome mansion of the President; conveniently near to his residence are the various public offices, all handsome, simple, and commodious; ample areas are left round each, where grass and shrubs refresh the eye. In another of the principal streets is the general post-office, and not far from it a very noble town- hall. Towards the quarter of the President’s house are several handsome dwellings, which are chiefly occupied by the foreign ministers. The houses in the other parts of the city are scattered, but without ever losing sight of the regularity of the original plan; and to a person who has been travelling much through the country, and marked the immense quantity of new manufactories, new canals, new railroads, new towns, and new cities, which are springing, as it were, from the earth in every part of it, the appearance of the metropolis rising gradually into life and splendour, is a spectacle of high historic interest.
I was thrilled with everything about Washington; it felt bright, cheerful, and open, reminding me of our trendy vacation spots. People, both foreigners and locals, have laughed at it because the city's original design was on an enormous scale, and very little of it has actually been built. But honestly, I don’t find it ridiculous at all; the original vision, which was as beautiful as it was grand, hasn’t changed, and everything that has been done has been done well. From the base of the hill where the Capitol stands stretches a grand street, lined with trees and featuring many impressive shops. This street, called Pennsylvania Avenue, is over a mile long, and at the end of it is the beautiful home of the President. Conveniently close to his residence are the various public offices, all attractive, simple, and functional; there are spacious areas around each, where grass and shrubs are refreshing to the eye. In another main street, there's the general post office, and nearby is a very impressive town hall. Close to the President's house are several elegant residences, mainly occupied by foreign ministers. The houses in other areas of the city are spread out, but they always maintain the regularity of the original plan. For someone who has traveled extensively through the country and seen the countless new factories, canals, railroads, towns, and cities that appear to be erupting from the ground everywhere, watching the capital gradually come to life and flourish is a sight of significant historical interest.
Commerce had already produced large and handsome cities in America before she had attained to an individual political existence, and Washington may be scorned as a metropolis, where such cities as Philadelphia and New York exist; but I considered it as the growing metropolis of the growing population of the Union, and it already possesses features noble enough to sustain its dignity as such.
Commerce had already created large and impressive cities in America before it achieved a separate political identity, and Washington might be dismissed as a major city, especially with Philadelphia and New York around; but I view it as the emerging capital of the expanding population of the Union, and it already has qualities significant enough to maintain its status.
The residence of the foreign legations and their families gives a tone to the society of this city which distinguishes it greatly from all others. It is also, for a great part of the year, the residence of the senators and representatives, who must be presumed to be the elite of the entire body of citizens, both in respect to talent and education. This cannot fail to make Washington a more agreeable abode than any other city in the Union.
The homes of foreign embassies and their families set a vibe for the city that really sets it apart from others. For a large part of the year, it’s also where the senators and representatives live, who are likely the elite among all citizens, in terms of talent and education. This definitely makes Washington a more enjoyable place to live than any other city in the country.
The total absence of all sights, sounds, or smells of commerce, adds greatly to the charm. Instead of drays you see handsome carriages; and instead of the busy bustling hustle of men, shuffling on to a sale of “dry goods” or “prime broad stuffs,” you see very well-dressed personages lounging leisurely up and down Pennsylvania Avenue.
The complete lack of any sights, sounds, or smells of business really adds to the charm. Instead of carts, you see beautiful carriages; and instead of the busy hustle of people rushing to buy “dry goods” or “high-quality fabrics,” you see very well-dressed individuals strolling casually up and down Pennsylvania Avenue.
Mr. Pishey Thompson, the English bookseller, with his pretty collection of all sorts of pretty literature, fresh from London, and Mr. Somebody, the jeweller, with his brilliant shop full of trinkets, are the principal points of attraction and business. What a contrast to all other American cities! The members, who pass several months every year in this lounging easy way, with no labour but a little talking, and with the douceur of eight dollars a day to pay them for it, must feel the change sadly when their term of public service is over.
Mr. Pishey Thompson, the English bookseller, with his lovely collection of all kinds of literature, fresh from London, and Mr. Somebody, the jeweler, with his dazzling shop full of trinkets, are the main attractions and business points. What a contrast to all other American cities! The members, who spend several months each year in this relaxed manner, with no work except for a bit of chatting, and with a nice stipend of eight dollars a day to compensate them for it, must feel the change quite harshly when their period of public service ends.
There is another circumstance which renders the evening parties at Washington extremely unlike those of other places in the Union; this is the great majority of gentlemen. The expense, the trouble, or the necessity of a ruling eye at home, one or all of these reasons, prevents the members’ ladies from accompanying them to Washington; at least, I heard of very few who had their wives with them. The female society is chiefly to be found among the families of the foreign ministers, those of the officers of state, and of the few members, the wealthiest and most aristocratic of the land, who bring their families with them. Some few independent persons reside in or near the city, but this is a class so thinly scattered that they can hardly be accounted a part of the population.
There’s another aspect that makes the evening parties in Washington very different from those in other places across the country; the majority of attendees are men. The cost, the hassle, or the need for someone to stay home, or a combination of these reasons, keeps the members’ wives from joining them in Washington; at least, I heard of very few who brought their wives along. The women present mainly come from the families of foreign diplomats, government officials, and a handful of the wealthiest and most elite members who do bring their families. A small number of independent individuals live in or near the city, but they’re so few that they can hardly be considered part of the population.
But, strange to say, even here a theatre cannot be supported for more than a few weeks at a time. I was told that gambling is the favourite recreation of the gentlemen, and that it is carried to a very considerable extent; but here, as elsewhere within the country, it is kept extremely well out of sight. I do not think I was present with a pack of cards a dozen times during more than three years that I remained in the country. Billiards are much played, though in most places the amusement is illegal. It often appeared to me that the old women of a state made the laws, and the young men broke them.
But oddly enough, even here a theater can only last for a few weeks at a time. I heard that gambling is the favorite pastime of the gentlemen, and it’s taken to quite an extent; but here, like in other parts of the country, it’s kept very much out of sight. I don’t think I had a deck of cards in my hand more than a dozen times during the more than three years I spent in the country. Billiards are played a lot, even though it's illegal in most places. It often seemed to me that the old women made the laws, and the young men broke them.
Notwithstanding the diminutive size of the city, we found much to see, and to amuse us.
Despite the small size of the city, we discovered a lot to see and enjoy.
The patent office is a curious record of the fertility of the mind of man when left to its own resources; but it gives ample proof also that it is not under such circumstances it is most usefully employed. This patent office contains models of all the mechanical inventions that have been produced in the Union, and the number is enormous. I asked the man who shewed these, what proportion of them had been brought into use, he said about one in a thousand; he told me also, that they chiefly proceeded from mechanics and agriculturists settled in remote parts of the country, who had began by endeavouring to hit upon some contrivance to enable them to get along without sending some thousand and odd miles for the thing they wanted. If the contrivance succeeded, they generally became so fond of this offspring of their ingenuity, that they brought it to Washington for a patent.
The patent office is an interesting record of human creativity when people are left to their own devices; however, it also shows that this creativity isn’t always put to its best use under those circumstances. This patent office holds models of all the mechanical inventions created in the country, and the number is huge. I asked the person who showed these models what percentage had actually been used, and he said about one in a thousand. He also told me that most of these inventions came from mechanics and farmers living in remote areas who started out trying to figure out a way to get what they needed without having to send away for it from thousands of miles away. If their idea worked, they typically became so attached to this product of their creativity that they took it to Washington to get a patent.
At the secretary of state’s office we were shewn autographs of all the potentates with whom the Union were in alliance; which, I believe, pretty well includes all. To the parchments bearing these royal signs manual were appended, of course, the official seals of each, enclosed in gold or silver boxes of handsome workmanship: I was amused by the manner in which one of their own, just prepared for the court of Russia, was displayed to us, and the superiority of their decorations pointed out. They were superior, and in much better taste than the rest; and I only wish that the feeling that induced this display would spread to every corner of the Union, and mix itself with every act and with every sentiment. Let America give a fair portion other attention to the arts and the graces that embellish life, and I will make her another visit, and write another book as unlike this as possible.
At the secretary of state’s office, we were shown autographs from all the leaders the Union is allied with, which I believe covers pretty much everyone. The documents with these royal signatures were naturally accompanied by the official seals of each leader, placed in beautifully crafted gold or silver boxes. I was entertained by the way one of their own, just prepared for the Russian court, was showcased for us, highlighting the superiority of their decorations. They were indeed superior and much better designed than the others; I just wish the pride that motivated this display would spread throughout the entire Union and influence every action and emotion. If America dedicated more attention to the arts and the elegance that enriches life, I would gladly make another visit and write a new book that is as different from this one as possible.
Among the royal signatures, the only ones which much interested me were two from the hand of Napoleon. The earliest of these, when he was first consul, was a most illegible scrawl, and, as the tradition went, was written on horseback; but his writing improved greatly after he became an emperor, the subsequent signature being firmly and clearly written.—I longed to steal both.
Among the royal signatures, the only ones that really caught my interest were two from Napoleon himself. The first one, from when he was First Consul, was a completely unreadable scrawl, and, according to tradition, was written while he was on horseback; however, his handwriting improved a lot after he became emperor, with the next signature being strong and clear. I really wanted to steal both.
The purity of the American character, formed and founded on the purity of the American government, was made evident to our senses by the display of all the offerings of esteem and regard which had been presented by various sovereigns to the different American ministers who had been sent to their courts. The object of the law which exacted this deposit from every individual so honoured, was, they told us, to prevent the possibility of bribery being used to corrupt any envoy of the Republic. I should think it would be a better way to select for the office such men as they felt could not be seduced by a sword or a snuff-box. But they, doubtless, know their own business best.
The integrity of the American character, built on the integrity of the American government, was clear to us through the display of all the gifts of respect and admiration that had been given by various rulers to the different American diplomats sent to their countries. The reason for the law that required this deposit from every individual so honored was, as they explained, to prevent the chance of bribery from corrupting any representative of the Republic. I think it would be better to choose for the position those individuals who can’t be tempted by a sword or a fancy box. But they surely know what they’re doing.
The bureau for Indian affairs contains a room of great interest: the walls are entirely covered with original portraits of all the chiefs who, from time to time, have come to negotiate with their great father, as they call the President.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs has a room of great interest: the walls are completely covered with original portraits of all the chiefs who have come to negotiate with their great father, as they refer to the President.
These portraits are by Mr. King, and, it cannot be doubted, are excellent likenesses, as are all the portraits I have ever seen from the hands of that gentleman. The countenances are full of expression, but the expression in most of them is extremely similar; or rather, I should say that they have but two sorts of expression; the one is that of very noble and warlike daring, the other of a gentle and naive simplicity, that has no mixture of folly in it, but which is inexpressibly engaging, and the more touching, perhaps, because at the moment we were looking at them, those very hearts which lent the eyes such meek and friendly softness, were wrung by a base, cruel, and most oppressive act of their great father.
These portraits are by Mr. King, and there’s no doubt they are excellent likenesses, just like all the portraits I’ve seen from his hand. The faces are full of expression, but most of them share a very similar vibe; or rather, I should say they have only two types of expression. One is of noble and brave daring, and the other is of a gentle and innocent simplicity, which isn’t foolish at all, but incredibly charming and even more poignant, perhaps, because at that moment we were looking at them, those very hearts that gave the eyes such soft and friendly warmth were being hurt by a base, cruel, and oppressive act from their great father.
We were at Washington at the time that the measure for chasing the last of several tribes of Indians from their forest homes, was canvassed in congress, and finally decided upon by the FIAT of the President. If the American character may be judged by their conduct in this matter, they are most lamentably deficient in every feeling of honour and integrity. It is among themselves, and from themselves, that I have heard the statements which represent them as treacherous and false almost beyond belief in their intercourse with the unhappy Indians. Had I, during my residence in the United States, observed any single feature in their national character that could justify their eternal boast of liberality and the love of freedom, I might have respected them, however much my taste might have been offended by what was peculiar in their manners and customs. But it is impossible for any mind of common honesty not to be revolted by the contradictions in their principles and practice. They inveigh against the governments of Europe, because, as they say, they favour the powerful and oppress the weak. You may hear this declaimed upon in Congress, roared out in taverns, discussed in every drawing-room, satirized upon the stage, nay, even anathematized from the pulpit: listen to it, and then look at them at home; you will see them with one hand hoisting the cap of liberty, and with the other flogging their slaves. You will see them one hour lecturing their mob on the indefeasible rights of man, and the next driving from their homes the children of the soil, whom they have bound themselves to protect by the most solemn treaties.
We were in Washington when Congress was debating the measure to drive the last remaining tribes of Native Americans from their forest homes, which was ultimately decided by the President's decree. If we assess American character based on their actions in this issue, they clearly lack any sense of honor and integrity. It's from their own words that I've heard them described as treacherous and deceitful, almost beyond belief, in their dealings with the unfortunate Native Americans. During my time in the United States, if I had seen any aspect of their national character that might justify their constant claims of generosity and a love for freedom, I might have respected them, even if their peculiar manners and customs bothered me. But it's impossible for anyone with a sense of honesty not to be repulsed by the contradictions in their principles and actions. They criticize European governments for favoring the powerful and oppressing the weak. You can hear this argued in Congress, shouted in bars, discussed in every living room, ridiculed on stage, and even condemned from the pulpit: listen to them, and then look at their actions at home; you'll see them raising the flag of liberty with one hand while whipping their slaves with the other. You'll see them lecturing their crowds about the undeniable rights of man one moment, then the next expelling the indigenous children from their lands, despite having solemn treaties to protect them.
In justice to those who approve not this treacherous policy, I will quote a paragraph from a New York paper, which shews that there are some among them who look with detestation on the bold bad measure decided upon at Washington in the year 1830.
In fairness to those who do not support this deceitful policy, I will quote a paragraph from a New York newspaper, which shows that there are some among them who view with disgust the audacious and wrong decision made in Washington in the year 1830.
“We know of no subject, at the present moment, of more importance to the character of our country for justice and integrity than that which relates to the Indian tribes in Georgia and Alabama, and particularly the Cherokees in the former state. The Act passed by Congress, just at the end of the session, co-operating with the tyrannical and iniquitous statute of Georgia, strikes a formidable blow at the reputation of the United States, in respect to their faith, pledged in almost innumerable instances, in the most solemn treaties and compacts.”
“We don't know of any issue right now that's more crucial to our country's character for justice and integrity than the situation with the Indian tribes in Georgia and Alabama, especially the Cherokees in Georgia. The Act passed by Congress at the end of the session, working with Georgia's oppressive and unjust law, delivers a serious blow to the reputation of the United States regarding their commitments made in countless solemn treaties and agreements.”
There were many objects of much interest shewn us at this Indian bureau; but, from the peculiar circumstances of this most unhappy and ill-used people, it was a very painful interest.
There were many intriguing items displayed at this Indian bureau; however, due to the unfortunate situation of this deeply wronged and mistreated people, it was a very painful kind of interest.
The dresses worn by the chiefs when their portraits were taken, are many of them splendid, from the embroidery of beads and other ornaments: and the room contains many specimens of their ingenuity, and even of their taste. There is a glass case in the room, wherein are arranged specimens of worked muslin, and other needlework, some very excellent handwriting, and many other little productions of male and female Indians, all proving clearly that they are perfectly capable of civilization. Indeed, the circumstance which renders their expulsion from their own, their native lands, so peculiarly lamentable, is, that they were yielding rapidly to the force of example; their lives were no longer those of wandering hunters, but they were becoming agriculturists, and the tyrannical arm of brutal power has not now driven them, as formerly, only from their hunting grounds, their favourite springs, and the sacred bones of their fathers, but it has chased them from the dwellings their advancing knowledge had taught them to make comfortable; from the newly-ploughed fields of their pride; and from the crops their sweat had watered. And for what? to add some thousand acres of territory to the half-peopled wilderness which borders them.
The dresses worn by the chiefs during their portraits are quite impressive, adorned with bead embroidery and other decorations. The room showcases many examples of their creativity and taste. There's a glass case displaying worked muslin, various needlework, some beautiful handwriting, and many other small creations from both male and female Native Americans, all clearly demonstrating that they are entirely capable of civilization. In fact, what makes their removal from their own native lands so tragically upsetting is that they were quickly adapting to the influence of others; their lives were shifting from those of wandering hunters to becoming farmers. The harsh hand of brutal power has not only driven them away from their hunting grounds, their favorite springs, and the sacred remains of their ancestors, but has also forced them out of the homes that their growing knowledge helped them create. They’ve been chased away from the fields they proudly cultivated and from the crops nourished by their labor. And for what? To expand the sparsely populated wilderness around them by a few thousand acres.
The Potomac, on arriving at Washington, makes a beautiful sweep, which forms a sort of bay, round which the city is built. Just where it makes the turn, a wooden bridge is thrown across, connecting the shores of Maryland and Virginia. This bridge is a mile and a quarter in length, and is ugly enough.[8] The navy-yard, and arsenal, are just above it, on the Maryland side, and make a handsome appearance on the edge of the river, following the sweep above mentioned. Near the arsenal (much too near) is the penitentiary, which, as it was just finished, and not inhabited, we examined in every part. It is built for the purpose of solitary confinement for life. A gallows is a much less nerve-shaking spectacle than one of these awful cells, and assuredly, when imprisonment therein for life is substituted for death, it is no mercy to the criminal; but if it be a greater terror to the citizen, it may answer the purpose better. I do not conceive, that out of a hundred human beings who had been thus confined for a year, one would be found at the end of it who would continue to linger on there, certain it was for ever, if the alternative of being hanged were offered to them. I had written a description of these horrible cells, but Captain Hall’s picture of a similar building is so accurate, and so clear, that it is needless to insert it.
The Potomac River, upon reaching Washington, makes a lovely curve that creates a sort of bay where the city is situated. Right at the curve, there’s a wooden bridge that connects the banks of Maryland and Virginia. This bridge stretches a mile and a quarter and isn’t very attractive. The navy yard and arsenal are just upstream on the Maryland side and look nice along the river’s edge, following the aforementioned curve. Close to the arsenal (too close, in fact) stands the penitentiary, which was newly built and unoccupied at the time we explored it. It’s designed for solitary confinement for life. A gallows is far less disturbing than one of these dreadful cells, and certainly, when life imprisonment replaces death, it offers no mercy to the criminal; however, if it instills greater fear in the public, it may serve its purpose better. I doubt that out of a hundred people who had been confined there for a year, even one would choose to stay there, *certain it was forever*, if they were offered the alternative of being hanged. I had written a detailed description of these terrible cells, but Captain Hall’s illustration of a similar facility is so accurate and clear that it’s unnecessary to include mine.
[8] It has since been washed away by the breaking up of the frost of February, 1831.
[8] It has since been washed away by the thawing frost of February, 1831.
Still following the sweep of the river, at the distance of two miles from Washington, is George Town, formerly a place of considerable commercial importance, and likely, I think, to become so again, when the Ohio and Chesapeake canals, which there mouths into the Potomac, shall be in full action. It is a very pretty town, commanding a lovely view, of which the noble Potomac and the almost nobler capitol, are the great features. The country rises into a beautiful line of hills behind Washington, which form a sort of undulating terrace on to George Town; this terrace is almost entirely occupied by a succession of gentlemen’s seats. At George Town the Potomac suddenly contracts itself, and begins to assume that rapid, rocky and irregular character which marks it afterwards, and renders its course, till it meets the Shenandoah at Harper’s Ferry, a series of the most wild and romantic views that are to be found in America.
Continuing along the river, two miles from Washington, is Georgetown, which used to be a significant commercial hub and is likely to regain that status once the Ohio and Chesapeake canals, which flow into the Potomac there, are fully operational. It’s a very charming town with a beautiful view, featuring the majestic Potomac and the almost more impressive capitol as its main highlights. The area rises into a stunning line of hills behind Washington, creating a sort of rolling terrace that leads to Georgetown, mostly taken up by a series of elegant homes. At Georgetown, the Potomac suddenly narrows and starts to take on the fast, rocky, and irregular characteristics that define it later on, making its path, until it meets the Shenandoah at Harper's Ferry, a series of the most wild and romantic vistas found in America.
Attending the debates in Congress was, of course, one of our great objects; and, as an English woman, I was perhaps the more eager to avail myself of the privilege allowed. It was repeatedly observed to me that, at least in this instance, I must acknowledge the superior gallantry of the Americans, and that they herein give a decided proof of surpassing the English in a wish to honour the ladies, as they have a gallery in the House of Representatives erected expressly for them, while in England they are rigorously excluded from every part of the House of Commons.
Attending the debates in Congress was definitely one of our main goals; and, as a British woman, I was probably even more eager to take advantage of the privilege offered to me. It was pointed out to me multiple times that, at least in this case, I had to acknowledge the greater courtesy of the Americans, and that this clearly showed they surpass the English in their desire to honor women, as they have a gallery in the House of Representatives specifically for them, while in England, women are strictly excluded from every area of the House of Commons.
But the inference I draw from this is precisely the reverse of the suggested. It is well known that the reason why the House of Commons was closed against ladies was, that their presence was found too attractive, and that so many members were tempted to neglect the business before the House, that they might enjoy the pleasure of conversing with the fair critics in the galleries, that it became a matter of national importance to banish them—and they were banished. It will be long ere the American legislature will find it necessary to pass the same law for the same reason. A lady of Washington, however, told me an anecdote which went far to shew that a more intellectual turn in the women, would produce a change in the manners of the men. She told me, that when the Miss Wrights were in Washington, with General Lafayette, they very frequently attended the debates, and that the most distinguished members were always crowding round them. For this unwonted gallantry they apologized to their beautiful countrywomen by saying, that if they took equal interest in the debates, the galleries would be always thronged by the members.
But the conclusion I reach from this is actually the opposite of what was suggested. It's well known that the reason the House of Commons was closed to women was that their presence was too appealing, and so many members were tempted to ignore the business at hand just to enjoy chatting with the lovely women in the galleries that it became a national issue to exclude them—and they were excluded. It will be a long time before the American legislature feels the need to enact the same law for the same reason. However, a woman from Washington shared a story with me that suggested a more intellectual approach from women would change the behavior of men. She mentioned that when the Miss Wrights were in Washington with General Lafayette, they often attended debates, and the most prominent members would always gather around them. To excuse this unusual behavior, they said to their beautiful fellow countrywomen that if they showed the same interest in the debates, the galleries would always be filled with members.
The privilege of attending these debates would be more valuable could the speakers be better heard from the gallery; but, with the most earnest attention, I could only follow one or two of the orators, whose voices were peculiarly loud and clear. This made it really a labour to listen; but the extreme beauty of the chamber was of itself a reason for going again and again. It was, however, really mortifying to see this splendid hall, fitted up in so stately and sumptuous a manner, filled with men, sitting in the most unseemly attitudes, a large majority with their hats on, and nearly all, spitting to an excess that decency forbids me to describe.
The chance to attend these debates would be more worthwhile if the speakers could be heard better from the gallery; but despite my best efforts, I could only catch the words of one or two of the speakers who were particularly loud and clear. This made listening quite a challenge, but the stunning beauty of the chamber was a reason to keep coming back. However, it was really disheartening to see this magnificent hall, richly and elegantly decorated, filled with men sitting in the most inappropriate positions, most of them with their hats on, and nearly all of them spitting to a degree that decency prevents me from describing.
Among the crowd, who must be included in this description, a few were distinguished by not wearing their hats, and by sitting on their chairs like other human beings, without throwing their legs above their heads. Whenever I enquired the name of one of these exceptions, I was told that it was Mr. This, or Mr. That, of Virginia.
Among the crowd, who should be part of this description, a few stood out for not wearing their hats and for sitting in their chairs like other people, without putting their legs up over their heads. Whenever I asked for the name of one of these exceptions, I was told it was Mr. This or Mr. That, of Virginia.
One day we were fortunate enough to get placed on the sofas between the pillars, on the floor of the House; the galleries being shut up, for the purpose of making some alterations, which it was hoped might improve the hearing in that part of the House occupied by the members, and which is universally complained of, as being very defective.[9] But in our places on the sofas we found we heard very much better than up stairs, and well enough to be extremely amused by the rude eloquence of a thorough horse and alligator orator from Kentucky, who entreated the house repeatedly to “go the whole hog.”
One day, we were lucky enough to sit on the sofas between the pillars on the floor of the House; the galleries were closed for some renovations that were hoped to improve the sound for the members' section, which everyone complained was pretty bad. But sitting on the sofas, we found we could hear much better than upstairs, and it was entertaining to listen to a rough speaker from Kentucky who kept urging the House to “go the whole hog.”
[9] As a proof of this defective hearing in the Hall of Congress, I may quote a passage from a newspaper report of a debate on improvements. It was proposed to suspend a ceiling of glass fifteen feet above the heads of the members. A member, speaking in favour of this proposal, said, “Members would then, at least, be able to understand what was the question before the House, an advantage which most of them did not now possess, respecting more than half the propositions upon which they voted.”
[9] To demonstrate this poor hearing in the Hall of Congress, I can quote a part of a newspaper report about a debate on improvements. It was suggested to install a glass ceiling fifteen feet above the members' heads. One member, supporting this idea, said, “Members would then, at the very least, be able to understand what the question was before the House, which is an advantage that most of them don’t currently have regarding more than half of the proposals they vote on.”
If I mistake not, every debate I listened to in the American Congress was upon one and the same subject, namely, the entire independence of each individual state, with regard to the federal government. The jealousy on this point appeared to me to be the very strangest political feeling that ever got possession of the mind of man. I do not pretend to judge the merits of this question. I speak solely of the very singular effect of seeing man after man start eagerly to his feet, to declare that the greatest injury, the basest injustice, the most obnoxious tyranny that could be practised against the state of which he was a member, would be a vote of a few million dollars for the purpose of making their roads or canals; or for drainage; or, in short, for any purpose of improvement whatsoever.
If I’m not mistaken, every debate I heard in the American Congress was about the same issue: the complete independence of each individual state in relation to the federal government. The jealousy around this topic seemed to me to be the strangest political sentiment ever to grip the mind of a person. I don’t claim to judge the merits of this issue. I’m just pointing out the very unusual sight of one man after another eagerly jumping to his feet to declare that the greatest harm, the most outrageous injustice, the most unacceptable tyranny that could be inflicted on their state would be to approve a few million dollars for building their roads or canals, or for drainage, or, in short, for any kind of improvement at all.
During the month we were at Washington, I heard a great deal of conversation respecting a recent exclusion from Congress of a gentleman, who, by every account, was one of the most esteemed men in the house, and, I think, the father of it. The crime for which this gentleman was out-voted by his own particular friends and admirers was, that he had given his vote for a grant of public money for the purpose of draining a most lamentable and unhealthy district, called “the dismal swamp!”
During the month we were in Washington, I heard a lot of talk about the recent removal from Congress of a man who, by all accounts, was one of the most respected people in the house, and, I believe, its founder. The reason this man was outvoted by his own friends and admirers was that he had voted for a funding allocation to drain a very unfortunate and unhealthy area known as “the dismal swamp!”
One great boast of the country is, that they have no national debt, or that they shall have none in two years. This seems not very wonderful, considering their productive tariff, and that the income paid to their president is 6,000_L. per annum_; other government salaries being in proportion, and all internal improvements, at the expense of the government treasury, being voted unconstitutional.
One of the country's biggest claims to fame is that they have no national debt, or that they won't have one in two years. This isn't too surprising, given their profitable tariff and that the income for their president is £6,000 a year. Other government salaries are proportionate, and all internal improvements funded by the government treasury have been deemed unconstitutional.
The Senate-chamber is, like the Hall of Congress, a semicircle, but of very much smaller dimensions. It is most elegantly fitted up, and what is better still, the senators, generally speaking, look like gentlemen. They do not wear their hats, and the activity of youth being happily past, they do not toss their heels above their heads. I would I could add they do not spit; but, alas! “I have an oath in heaven,” and may not write an untruth.
The Senate chamber is, like the Hall of Congress, a semicircle, but much smaller. It’s very elegantly furnished, and even better, the senators usually look like gentlemen. They don’t wear their hats, and now that their youthful energy has faded, they don’t kick their heels over their heads. I wish I could say they don’t spit; but, sadly, "I have an oath in heaven," and I can’t write a lie.
A very handsome room, opening on a noble stone balcony is fitted up as a library for the members. The collection, as far as a very cursory view could enable me to judge, was very like that of a private English gentleman, but with less Latin, Greek, and Italian. This room also is elegantly furnished; rich Brussels carpet; library tables, with portfolios of engravings; abundance of sofas, and so on. The view from it is glorious, and it looks like the abode of luxury and taste.
A beautiful room with a grand stone balcony is set up as a library for the members. From what I could quickly see, the collection resembles that of a wealthy English gentleman, but has fewer Latin, Greek, and Italian books. This room is also tastefully decorated; it has a luxurious Brussels carpet, library tables with portfolios of engravings, plenty of sofas, and more. The view from here is stunning, and it feels like a place of luxury and refinement.
I can by no means attempt to describe all the apartments of this immense building, but the magnificent rotunda in the centre must not be left unnoticed. It is, indeed, a noble hall, a hundred feet in diameter, and of an imposing loftiness, lighted by an ample dome.
I can’t possibly describe all the rooms in this enormous building, but the stunning rotunda in the center deserves a mention. It really is a grand hall, a hundred feet wide, with an impressive height, lit by a large dome.
Almost any pictures (excepting the cartoons) would look paltry in this room, from the immense height of the walls; but the subjects of the four pictures which are placed there, are of such high historic interest that they should certainly have a place somewhere, as national records. One represents the signing of the declaration of independence; another the resignation of the presidency by the great Washington; another the celebrated victory of General Gates at Saratoga; and the fourth….I do not well remember, but I think it is some other martial scene, commemorating a victory; I rather think that of York Town.
Almost any pictures (except the cartoons) would look small in this room, given the huge height of the walls; but the subjects of the four pictures displayed there are so historically significant that they definitely deserve a spot somewhere as national records. One shows the signing of the Declaration of Independence; another depicts George Washington resigning the presidency; another captures General Gates's famous victory at Saratoga; and the fourth… I can't quite remember, but I think it's another military scene commemorating a victory; I believe it's the one from Yorktown.
One other object in the capitol must be mentioned, though it occurs in so obscure a part of the building, that one or two members to whom I mentioned it, were not aware of its existence. The lower part of the edifice, a story below the rotunda, &c., has a variety of committee rooms, courts, and other places of business. In a hall leading to some of these rooms, the ceiling is supported by pillars, the capitals of which struck me as peculiarly beautiful. They are composed of the ears and leaves of the Indian corn, beautifully arranged, and forming as graceful an outline as the acanthus itself. This was the only instance I saw, in which America has ventured to attempt national originality; the success is perfect. A sense of fitness always enhances the effect of beauty. I will not attempt a long essay on the subject, but if America, in her vastness, her immense natural resources, and her remote grandeur, would be less imitative, she would be infinitely more picturesque and interesting.
One other thing in the capitol needs to be mentioned, although it's located in such an obscure part of the building that one or two members I mentioned it to were unaware it existed. The lower section of the building, one floor below the rotunda, has various committee rooms, courts, and other workspaces. In a hall leading to some of these rooms, the ceiling is supported by pillars, and the tops of these pillars struck me as especially beautiful. They're made from the ears and leaves of Indian corn, artistically arranged to form a shape as graceful as the acanthus itself. This was the only instance I saw where America attempted genuine national originality; the outcome is perfect. A sense of appropriateness always enhances the impact of beauty. I won't write a lengthy essay on this, but if America, with its vastness, immense natural resources, and distant grandeur, could be less imitative, it would be so much more picturesque and interesting.
The President has regular evening parties, every other Wednesday, which are called his levées; the last syllable is pronounced by every one as long as possible, being exactly the reverse of the French and English manner of pronouncing the same word. The effect of this, from the very frequent repetition of the word in all companies is very droll, and for a long time I thought people were quizzing these public days. The reception rooms are handsome, particularly the grand saloon, which is elegantly, nay, splendidly furnished; this has been done since the visit of Captain Hall, whose remarks upon the former state of this room may have hastened its decoration; but there are a few anomalies in some parts of the entertainment, which are not very courtly. The company are about as select as that of an Easter-day ball at the Mansion-house.
The President hosts regular evening parties every other Wednesday, known as his levées; everyone stretches out the last syllable as much as possible, which is the exact opposite of how the French and English say the word. This has a funny effect, especially since the word is repeated so often in all sorts of gatherings, and for a long time, I thought people were poking fun at these public events. The reception rooms are beautiful, especially the grand salon, which is stylishly, even lavishly, furnished; this improvement might be thanks to Captain Hall’s visit, as his comments on the previous condition of this room may have sped up its decoration. However, there are a few oddities in some aspects of the events that aren't very formal. The guest list is about as exclusive as that of an Easter-day ball at the Mansion House.
The churches at Washington are not superb; but the Episcopalian and Catholic were filled with elegantly dressed women. I observed a greater proportion of gentlemen at church at Washington than any where else.
The churches in Washington aren't grand, but the Episcopalian and Catholic ones were filled with well-dressed women. I noticed a higher number of men in church in Washington than anywhere else.
The Presbyterian ladies go to church three times in the day, but the general appearance of Washington on a Sunday is much less puritanical than that of most other American towns; the people walk about, and there are no chains in the streets, as at Philadelphia, to prevent their riding or driving, if they like it.
The Presbyterian ladies go to church three times a day, but the overall vibe in Washington on a Sunday is much less strict than in most other American towns; people stroll around, and there are no barriers in the streets, like in Philadelphia, to stop them from riding or driving if they want to.
The ladies dress well, but not so splendidly as at Baltimore. I remarked that it was not very unusual at Washington for a lady to take the arm of a gentleman, who was neither her husband, her father, nor her brother. This remarkable relaxation of American decorum has been probably introduced by the foreign legations.
The women dress nicely, but not as elegantly as in Baltimore. I noticed that it's not uncommon in Washington for a woman to take the arm of a man who is neither her husband, father, nor brother. This noticeable shift in American etiquette has likely been influenced by the foreign embassies.
At about a mile from the town, on the high terrace ground above described, is a very pretty place, to which the proprietor has given the name Kaleirama. It is not large, or in any way magnificent, but the view from it is charming; and it has a little wood behind, covering about two hundred acres of broken ground, that slopes down to a dark cold little river, so closely shut in by rocks and evergreens, that it might serve as a noon-day bath for Diana and her nymphs. The whole of this wood is filled with wild flowers, but such as we cherish fondly in our gardens.
At about a mile from the town, on the elevated ground mentioned earlier, is a lovely spot called Kaleirama by its owner. It isn’t large or particularly grand, but the view from there is delightful; and it has a small forest behind it, covering about two hundred acres of uneven terrain, sloping down to a dark, chilly stream, so tightly surrounded by rocks and evergreens that it could serve as a midday bath for Diana and her nymphs. The entire forest is filled with wildflowers, but the kind we lovingly grow in our gardens.
A ferry at George Town crosses the Potomac, and about two miles from it, on the Virginian side, is Arlington, the seat of Mr. Custis, who is the grandson of General Washington’s wife. It is a noble looking place, having a portico of stately white columns, which, as the mansion stands high, with a background of dark woods, forms a beautiful object in the landscape. At George Town is a nunnery, where many young ladies are educated, and at a little distance from it, a college of Jesuits for the education of young men, where, as their advertisements state, “the humanities are taught.” We attended mass at the chapel of the nunnery, where the female voices that performed the chant were very pleasing. The shadowy form of the veiled abbess in her little sacred parlour, seen through a grating and a black curtain, but rendered clearly visible by the light of a Gothic window behind her, drew a good deal of our attention; every act of genuflection, even the telling her beads, was discernible, but so mistily that it gave her, indeed, the appearance of a being who had already quitted this life, and was hovering on the confines of the world of shadows.
A ferry at George Town crosses the Potomac River, and about two miles away, on the Virginia side, lies Arlington, the home of Mr. Custis, who is the grandson of General Washington’s wife. It’s a striking place, featuring a portico with impressive white columns. Since the mansion is built on high ground and surrounded by dark woods, it creates a beautiful scene in the landscape. In George Town, there’s a nunnery where many young women are educated, and not far from it, there’s a Jesuit college for young men, where, as their advertisements claim, “the humanities are taught.” We attended mass at the nunnery’s chapel, where the female voices in the choir sang beautifully. The shadowy figure of the veiled abbess in her small sacred room, seen through a grating and a black curtain, but illuminated by a Gothic window behind her, captured a lot of our attention; her every act of reverence, even counting her beads, was visible, but so indistinctly that it made her seem like a being who had already left this life and was lingering at the edge of the world of shadows.
The convent has a considerable inclosure attached to it, where I frequently saw from the heights above it, dark figures in awfully thick black veils, walking solemnly up and down.
The convent has a large enclosed area connected to it, where I often saw from the heights above, dark figures in very thick black veils, walking solemnly back and forth.
The American lady, who was the subject of one of Prince Hohenlohe’s celebrated miracles, was pointed out to us at Washington. All the world declare that her recovery was marvellous.
The American woman, who was the focus of one of Prince Hohenlohe’s famous miracles, was pointed out to us in Washington. Everyone says that her recovery was incredible.
There appeared to be a great many foreigners at Washington, particularly French. In Paris I have often observed that it was a sort of fashion to speak of America as a new Utopia, especially among the young liberals, who, before the happy accession of Philip, fancied that a country without a king, was the land of promise; but I sometimes thought that, like many other fine things, it lost part of its brilliance when examined too nearly; I overheard the following question and answer pass between two young Frenchmen, who appeared to have met for the first time.
There seemed to be a lot of foreigners in Washington, especially French people. In Paris, I often noticed that it was somewhat trendy to talk about America as a new Utopia, especially among young liberals, who, before the fortunate arrival of Philip, believed that a country without a king was the land of opportunity; however, I sometimes felt that, like many other great things, it lost some of its allure when looked at too closely. I overheard a question and answer exchanged between two young Frenchmen who seemed to be meeting for the first time.
“Eh bien. Monsieur, comment trouvez-vous la liberté et l’égalité mises en action?”
“Hey, sir, what do you think about freedom and equality in action?”
“Mais, Monsieur, je vous avoue que le beau idéal que nous autres, nous avons conçu de tout cela à Paris, avait quelque chose de plus poétique que ce que nous trouvons ici!”
“However, sir, I must confess that the beautiful ideal we have envisioned of all this in Paris has something more poetic than what we find here!”
On another occasion I was excessively amused by the tone in which one of these young men replied to a question put to him by another Frenchman. A pretty looking woman, but exceedingly deficient in tournure, was standing alone at a little distance from them and close at their elbows stood a very awkward looking gentleman. “Qui est cette dame?” said the enquirer. “Monsieur,” said my young fat, with an indescribable grimace, “c’est la femelle de ce male, “ indicating his neighbour by an expressive curl of his upper lip.
On another occasion, I was really amused by the way one of these young men responded to a question from another Frenchman. A pretty woman, but lacking in style, was standing a bit away from them, and right by them was a very awkward-looking guy. "Who is that lady?" asked the inquirer. "Sir," said my young friend, making an indescribable face, "that's the female of that male," indicating his neighbor with a notable curl of his upper lip.
The theatre was not open while we were in Washington, but we afterwards took advantage of our vicinity to the city, to visit it. The house is very small, and most astonishingly dirty and void of decoration, considering that it is the only place of public amusement that the city affords. I have before mentioned the want of decorum at the Cincinnati theatre, but certainly that of the capital at least rivalled it in the freedom of action and attitude; a freedom which seems to disdain the restraints of civilized manners. One man in the pit was seized with a violent fit of vomiting, which appeared not in the least to annoy or surprise his neighbours; and the happy coincidence of a physician being at that moment personated on the stage, was hailed by many of the audience as an excellent joke, of which the actor took advantage, and elicited shouts of applause by saying, “I expect my services are wanted elsewhere.”
The theater was closed while we were in Washington, but later we took the opportunity to visit it since we were nearby. The venue is very small and surprisingly dirty and lacking in decoration, especially considering it’s the only place for public entertainment in the city. I previously mentioned the lack of decorum at the Cincinnati theater, but the one in the capital at least matched it in terms of freedom of behavior and attitude; a freedom that seems to disregard the boundaries of civilized conduct. One man in the audience suddenly had a violent vomiting fit, which didn’t seem to bother or shock those around him at all; and the timely coincidence of a doctor being portrayed on stage was seen by many in the audience as a hilarious joke, which the actor capitalized on, receiving applause as he said, “I guess my services are needed elsewhere.”
The spitting was incessant; and not one in ten of the male part of the illustrious legislative audiences sat according to the usual custom of human beings; the legs were thrown sometimes over the front of the box, sometimes over the side of it; here and there a senator stretched his entire length along a bench, and in many instances the front rail was preferred as a seat.
The spitting wouldn't stop; and barely one out of ten of the male members of the distinguished legislative audience sat like normal people do. Some threw their legs over the front of the box, while others had them over the side; a few senators lay flat on a bench, and many actually chose to sit on the front rail.
I remarked one young man, whose handsome person, and most elaborate toilet, led me to conclude he was a first-rate personage, and so I doubt not he was; nevertheless, I saw him take from the pocket of his silk waistcoat a lump of tobacco, and daintily deposit it within his cheek.
I noticed a young man whose good looks and stylish outfit made me think he was someone important, which he probably was; however, I saw him pull a chunk of tobacco from the pocket of his silk waistcoat and carefully place it in his cheek.
I am inclined to think this most vile and universal habit of chewing tobacco is the cause of a remarkable peculiarity in the male physiognomy of Americans; their lips are almost uniformly thin and compressed. At first I accounted for this upon Lavater’s theory, and attributed it to the arid temperament of the people; but it is too universal to be explained; whereas the habit above mentioned, which pervades all classes (excepting the literary) well accounts for it, as the act of expressing the juices of this loathsome herb, enforces exactly that position of the lips, which gives this remarkable peculiarity to the American countenance.
I tend to believe that this widespread and disgusting habit of chewing tobacco is behind a notable feature in the facial appearance of American men; their lips are almost always thin and tight. Initially, I tried to explain this using Lavater’s theory, thinking it was due to the dry nature of the people; however, it’s too common to be attributed to that alone. On the other hand, the mentioned habit, which spans all social classes (except for those who are literary), clearly accounts for it, as the act of squeezing out the juices of this repugnant plant forces the lips into a position that gives this distinctive characteristic to the American face.
A member of Congress died while we were at Washington, and I was surprised by the ceremony and dignity of his funeral. It seems that whenever a senator or member of Congress dies during the session, he is buried at the expense of the government, (the ceremony not coming under the head of internal improvement), and the arrangements for the funeral are not interfered with by his friends, but become matters of State. I transcribed the order of the procession as being rather grand and stately.
A member of Congress passed away while we were in Washington, and I was taken aback by the ceremony and dignity of his funeral. It seems that whenever a senator or member of Congress dies during a session, the government covers the funeral expenses (the ceremony doesn’t fall under internal improvement), and the arrangements aren’t handled by his friends but become state matters. I noted down the order of the procession since it was quite grand and stately.
Chaplains of both Houses.
Physicians who attend the deceased.
Committee of arrangement.
THE BODY,
(Pall borne by six members.)
The Relations of the deceased, with the
Senators and Representatives of the State
to which he belonged, as Mourners.
Sergeant at arms of the House of Representatives.
The House of Representatives,
Their Speaker and Clerk preceding.
The Senate of the United States.
The Vice-president and Secretary preceding,
THE PRESIDENT
Chaplains of both Houses.
Doctors who attend to the deceased.
Arrangement committee.
THE BODY,
(Pall carried by six members.)
The relatives of the deceased, along with the
Senators and Representatives from their state,
as mourners.
Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives.
The House of Representatives,
with their Speaker and Clerk leading the way.
The Senate of the United States.
The Vice President and Secretary leading the way,
THE PRESIDENT
The procession was of considerable extent, but not on foot, and the majority of the carriages were hired for the occasion. The body was interred in an open “grave yard” near the city. I did not see the monument erected on this occasion, but I presume it was in the same style as several others I had remarked in the same burying-ground, inscribed to the memory of members who had died at Washington. These were square blocks of masonry without any pretension to splendour.
The procession was quite large, but it wasn’t on foot, and most of the carriages were rented for the event. The body was buried in an open “graveyard” near the city. I didn’t see the monument built for this occasion, but I assume it was similar to several others I had noticed in the same cemetery, dedicated to the memory of members who had died in Washington. These were simple square blocks of stone without any fancy features.
CHAPTER XXI
Stonington—Great Falls of the Potomac
Stonington—Great Falls, Potomac River
The greatest pleasure I had promised myself in visiting Washington was the seeing a very old friend, who had left England many years ago, and married in America; she was now a widow, and, as I believed, settled in Washington. I soon had the mortification of finding that she was not in the city; but ere long I learnt that her residence was not more than ten miles from it. We speedily met, and it was settled that we should pass the summer with her in Maryland, and after a month devoted to Washington, we left it for Stonington.
The biggest joy I looked forward to in visiting Washington was seeing a very old friend who had left England many years ago and married in America; she was now a widow and, as I believed, living in Washington. I quickly felt disappointed when I found out she wasn't in the city, but soon learned that she lived less than ten miles away. We met up soon after, and it was decided that we would spend the summer with her in Maryland. After a month spent in Washington, we left for Stonington.
We arrived there the beginning of May, and the kindness of our reception, the interest we felt in becoming acquainted with the family of my friend, the extreme beauty of the surrounding country, and the lovely season, altogether, made our stay there a period of great enjoyment.
We arrived there at the beginning of May, and the warmth of our welcome, the excitement of getting to know my friend's family, the stunning beauty of the area, and the beautiful season combined to make our time there incredibly enjoyable.
I wonder not that the first settlers in Virginia, with the bold Captain Smith of chivalrous memory at their head, should have fought so stoutly to dispossess the valiant father of Pocohantas of his fair domain, for I certainly never saw a more tempting territory. Stonington is about two miles from the most romantic point of the Potomac River, and Virginia spreads her wild, but beautiful, and most fertile Paradise, on the opposite shore. The Maryland side partakes of the same character, and perfectly astonished us by the profusion of her wild fruits and flowers.
I can't believe the first settlers in Virginia, led by the daring Captain Smith, fought so hard to take land from the brave father of Pocahontas. I’ve never seen a more inviting territory. Stonington is about two miles from the most stunning spot on the Potomac River, and Virginia lays out its wild, yet beautiful and incredibly fertile paradise on the other side. The Maryland side has the same charm and completely amazed us with the abundance of its wild fruits and flowers.
We had not been long within reach of the great falls of the Potomac before a party was made for us to visit them; the walk from Stonington to these falls is through scenery that can hardly be called forest, park, or garden; but which partakes of all three. A little English girl accompanied us, who had but lately left her home; she exclaimed, “Oh! how many English ladies would glory in such a garden as this!” and in truth they might; cedars, tulip-trees, planes, shumacs, junipers, and oaks of various kinds, most of them new to us, shaded our path. Wild vines, with their rich expansive leaves, and their sweet blossom, rivalling the mignionette in fragrance, clustered round their branches. Strawberries in full bloom, violets, anemonies, heart’s-ease, and wild pinks, with many other, and still lovelier flowers, which my ignorance forbids me to name, literally covered the ground. The arbor judae, the dog-wood, in its fullest glory of star-like flowers, azalias, and wild roses, dazzled our eyes whichever way we turned them. It was the most flowery two miles I ever walked.
We hadn’t been near the great falls of the Potomac for long before a group was organized for us to visit them. The walk from Stonington to the falls takes you through scenery that can hardly be described as just a forest, park, or garden; it has elements of all three. A little English girl joined us, who had just recently left her home. She exclaimed, “Oh! How many English ladies would be thrilled to have a garden like this!” and she was right; cedars, tulip trees, planes, shumacs, junipers, and various kinds of oaks, most of which were new to us, lined our path. Wild vines with their broad, lush leaves and sweet-smelling blossoms that rivaled mignonette in fragrance wrapped around the branches. Strawberries in full bloom, violets, anemones, heart’s-ease, and wild pinks, along with many other, even more beautiful flowers that I can’t name, completely covered the ground. The flowering dogwood, in its stunning display of star-like flowers, azaleas, and wild roses, dazzled our eyes no matter where we looked. It was the most flowery two miles I’ve ever walked.
The sound of the falls is heard at Stonington, and the gradual increase of this sound is one of the agreeable features of this delicious walk. I know not why the rush of waters is so delightful to the ear; all other monotonous sounds are wearying, and harass the spirits, but I never met any one who did not love to listen to a waterfall. A rapid stream, called the “Branch Creek,” was to be crossed ere we reached the spot where the falls are first visible. This rumbling, turbid, angry little rivulet, flows through evergreens and flowering underwood, and is crossed a plusieures reprises, by logs thrown from rock to rock. The thundering noise of the still unseen falls suggests an idea of danger while crossing these rude bridges, which hardly belongs to them; having reached the other side of the creek, we continued under the shelter of the evergreens for another quarter of a mile, and then emerged upon a sight that drew a shout of wonder and delight from us all. The rocky depths of an enormous river were opened before our eyes and so huge are the black crags that inclose it, that the thundering torrents of water rushing through, over, and among the rocks of this awful chasm, appear lost and swallowed up in it.
The sound of the falls can be heard in Stonington, and the gradual increase of this sound is one of the pleasant features of this lovely walk. I'm not sure why the rush of water is so soothing to the ear; all other monotonous sounds can be tiresome and drain the spirit, but I’ve never met anyone who didn’t enjoy listening to a waterfall. We had to cross a fast-flowing stream called “Branch Creek” before we reached the spot where the falls are first visible. This noisy, murky little stream rushes through evergreens and flowering underbrush, and is crossed multiple times by logs tossed from rock to rock. The thunderous noise of the unseen falls gives a sense of danger while crossing these rough bridges, which doesn’t really belong to them; once we reached the other side of the creek, we continued under the shelter of the evergreens for another quarter of a mile, and then we came upon a sight that made us all shout in wonder and delight. The rocky depths of a massive river lay open before us, and the enormous black cliffs that surround it are so huge that the thundering torrents of water rushing through, over, and among the rocks of this terrifying chasm seem to be lost and swallowed up within it.
The river, or rather the bed of it, is here of great width, and most frightful depth, lined on all sides with huge masses of black rock of every imaginable form. The flood that roars through them is seen only at intervals; here in a full heavy sheet of green transparent water, falling straight and unbroken; there dashing along a narrow channel, with a violence that makes one dizzy to see and hear. In one place an unfathomed pool shows a mirror of inky blackness, and as still as night; in another the tortured twisted cataract tumbles headlong in a dozen different torrents, half hid by the cloud of spray they send high into the air. Despite this uproar, the slenderest, loveliest shrubs, peep forth from among these hideous rocks, like children smiling in the midst of danger. As we stood looking at this tremendous scene, one of our friends made us remark, that the poison alder, and the poison vine, threw their graceful, but perfidious branches, over every rock, and assured us also that innumerable tribes of snakes found their dark dwellings among them.
The river, or rather its bed, is very wide here and incredibly deep, lined all around with massive chunks of black rock in every imaginable shape. The flood rushing through them can only be seen at intervals; sometimes it appears as a full heavy sheet of clear green water, falling straight and unbroken; at other times, it crashes through a narrow channel with such force that it makes you dizzy just to see and hear it. In one spot, a deep pool reflects a mirror of inky blackness, as still as night; in another, the chaotic waterfall tumbles headfirst in a dozen different streams, partly hidden by the cloud of spray they send sky-high. Despite this chaos, delicate, beautiful shrubs poke out from among these terrifying rocks, like children smiling in the face of danger. As we stood admiring this awe-inspiring scene, one of our friends pointed out that poison alder and poison vine draped their graceful, yet treacherous, branches over every rock, and assured us that countless snakes made their dark homes among them.
To call this scene beautiful would be a strange abuse of terms, for it is altogether composed of sights and sounds of terror. The falls of the Potomac are awfully sublime: the dark deep gulf which yawns before you, the foaming, roaring cataract, the eddying whirlpool, and the giddy precipice, all seem to threaten life, and to appal the senses. Yet it was a great delight to sit upon a high and jutting crag, and look and listen.
To describe this scene as beautiful would be a misuse of the word, because it's entirely filled with sights and sounds of fear. The Potomac Falls are terrifyingly impressive: the dark, vast chasm that opens before you, the crashing, roaring waterfall, the swirling whirlpool, and the dizzying cliff all seem to threaten life and overwhelm the senses. Still, it was a real pleasure to sit on a high, jutting rock and observe while listening.
I heard with pleasure that it was to the Virginian side of the Potomac that the “felicity hunters” of Washington resorted to see this fearful wonder, for I never saw a spot where I should less have liked the annoying “how d’ye,” of a casual rencontre. One could not even give or receive the exciting “is it not charming,” which Rousseau talks of, for if it were uttered, it could not be heard, or, if heard, would fall most earthly dull on the spirit, when rapt by the magic of such a scene. A look, or the silent pressure of the arm, is all the interchange of feeling that such a scene allows, and in the midst of my terror and my pleasure, I wished for the arm and the eye of some few from the other side of the Atlantic.
I was happy to hear that the "pleasure seekers" from Washington went to the Virginia side of the Potomac to see this amazing sight, because I can't think of a place where I would have preferred the annoying "how are you" of a random encounter less. You couldn't even share or receive the thrilling "isn't it beautiful," like Rousseau talks about, because if it were said, it wouldn't be heard, or if it was heard, it would sound completely dull to the spirit, which is captivated by such a scene. A glance or a gentle touch of the arm is the only way feelings can be exchanged in such a moment, and amidst my fear and my joy, I longed for the arm and gaze of a few people from the other side of the Atlantic.
The return from such a scene is more soberly silent than the approach to it; but the cool and quiet hour, the mellowed tints of some gay blossoms, and the closed bells of others, the drowsy hum of the insects that survive the day, and the moist freshness that forbids the foot to weary in its homeward path, have all enjoyment in them, and seem to harmonize with the half wearied, half excited state of spirits, that such an excursion is sure to produce: and then the entering the cool and moonlit portico, the well-iced sangaree, or still more refreshing coffee, that waits you, is all delightful; and if to this be added the happiness of an easy sofa, and a friend like my charming Mrs. S—, to soothe you with an hour of Mozart the most fastidious European might allow that such a day was worth waking for.
The return from such a scene is quieter than the journey there; but the cool and calm hour, the soft colors of some vibrant flowers, and the closed petals of others, the lazy buzz of the insects that survive the day, and the fresh, damp air that makes the walk home easy all bring enjoyment and seem to match the half-tired, half-excited state of mind that such an outing is sure to create: and then entering the cool, moonlit porch, the chilled sangaree or even more refreshing coffee that awaits you is all delightful; and if you add the comfort of a cozy sofa and a friend like my charming Mrs. S— to relax you with an hour of Mozart, even the most discerning European might agree that such a day is worth waking up for.
CHAPTER XXII
Small Landed Proprietors—Slavery
Small Landowners—Slavery
I now, for the first time since I crossed the mountains, found myself sufficiently at leisure to look deliberately round, and mark the different aspects of men and things in a region which, though bearing the same name, and calling itself the same land, was, in many respects, as different from the one I had left, as Amsterdam from St. Petersburg. There every man was straining, and struggling, and striving for himself (heaven knows!) Here every white man was waited upon, more or less, by a slave. There, the newly-cleared lands, rich with the vegetable manure accumulated for ages, demanded the slightest labour to return the richest produce; where the plough entered, crops the most abundant followed; but where it came not, no spot of native verdure, no native fruits, no native flowers cheered the eye; all was close, dark, stifling forest. Here the soil had long ago yielded its first fruits; much that had been cleared and cultivated for tobacco (the most exhausting of crops) by the English, required careful and laborious husbandry to produce any return; and much was left as sheep-walks. It was in these spots that the natural bounty of the soil and climate was displayed by the innumerable wild fruits and flowers which made every dingle and bushy dell seem a garden.
I now, for the first time since crossing the mountains, found myself with enough free time to look around and notice the different aspects of people and things in a region that, although it shared the same name and called itself the same land, was in many ways as different from the one I had left as Amsterdam is from St. Petersburg. There, every man was pushing, struggling, and striving for himself (who knows why!). Here, every white man was being attended to, more or less, by a slave. There, the newly cleared lands, rich with the plant nutrients built up over ages, needed minimal effort to yield the richest produce; wherever the plow went, abundant crops followed; but where it didn’t, no patch of native greenery, no native fruits, and no native flowers brightened the scene; everything was a dense, dark, stifling forest. Here, the soil had long ago given its first fruits; much of what had been cleared and cultivated for tobacco (the most depleting of crops) by the English required careful and strenuous farming to yield any return; and much was left as grazing land for sheep. It was in these areas that the natural richness of the soil and climate was shown through the countless wild fruits and flowers that made every small valley and bushy hollow seem like a garden.
On entering the cottages I found also a great difference in the manner of living. Here, indeed, there were few cottages without a slave, but there were fewer still that had their beefsteak and onions for breakfast, dinner, and supper. The herrings of the bountiful Potomac supply their place. These are excellent “relish,” as they call it, when salted, and, if I mistake not, are sold at a dollar and a half per thousand. Whiskey, however, flows every where at the same fatally cheap rate of twenty cents (about one shilling) the gallon, and its hideous effects are visible on the countenance of every man you meet.
On entering the cottages, I noticed a big difference in the way people lived. Indeed, there were few cottages without a slave, but even fewer had beefsteak and onions for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. The herrings from the plentiful Potomac filled in for that. These are excellent "relish," as they call it, when salted, and, if I’m not wrong, they’re sold for a dollar and a half per thousand. Whiskey, however, flows everywhere at the same dangerously low price of twenty cents (about one shilling) per gallon, and its horrible effects are visible on the face of every man you encounter.
The class of people the most completely unlike any existing in England, are those who, farming their own freehold estates, and often possessing several slaves, yet live with as few of the refinements, and I think I may say, with as few of the comforts of life, as the very poorest English peasant. When in Maryland, I went into the houses of several of these small proprietors, and remained long enough, and looked and listened sufficiently, to obtain a tolerably correct idea of their manner of living.
The group of people who are the most different from anyone in England are those who farm their own land and often own several slaves, yet live with as few luxuries and, I would say, as few comforts as the very poorest English peasant. While I was in Maryland, I visited the homes of several of these small property owners and spent enough time there, observing and listening, to get a reasonably accurate picture of their way of life.
One of these families consisted of a young man, his wife, two children, a female slave, and two young lads, slaves also. The farm belonged to the wife, and, I was told, consisted of about three hundred acres of indifferent land, but all cleared. The house was built of wood, and looked as if the three slaves might have overturned it, had they pushed hard against the gable end. It contained one room, of about twelve feet square, and another adjoining it, hardly larger than a closet; this second chamber was the lodging-room of the white part of the family. Above these rooms was a loft, without windows, where I was told the “staying company” who visited them, were lodged. Near this mansion was a “shanty,” a black hole, without any window, which served as kitchen and all other offices, and also as the lodging of the blacks.
One of these families included a young man, his wife, two kids, a female slave, and two young boys, who were also slaves. The farm belonged to the wife and was said to be about three hundred acres of poor-quality land, but it was all cleared. The house was made of wood and looked like it could be knocked down by the three slaves if they pushed hard against the gable end. It had one room that was about twelve feet square and another room next to it, which was barely bigger than a closet; this second room was where the white part of the family slept. Above these rooms was a loft, without windows, where I was told the "visiting company" stayed when they came to visit. Close to this house was a "shanty," a dark little structure with no windows, that served as the kitchen and all other facilities, and also as the sleeping quarters for the black residents.
We were invited to take tea with this family, and readily consented to do so. The furniture of the room was one heavy huge table, and about six wooden chairs. When we arrived the lady was in rather a dusky dishabille, but she vehemently urged us to be seated, and then retired into the closet-chamber above mentioned, whence she continued to address to us from behind the door, all kinds of “genteel country visiting talk,” and at length emerged upon us in a smart new dress.
We were invited to have tea with this family, and we happily agreed. The room had a large heavy table and about six wooden chairs. When we got there, the lady was dressed somewhat casually, but she insisted we take a seat, then went into the closet mentioned earlier, where she continued to talk to us from behind the door, engaging in all sorts of polite small talk. Eventually, she came out to join us in a stylish new outfit.
Her female slave set out the great table, and placed upon it cups of the very coarsest blue ware, a little brown sugar in one, and a tiny drop of milk in another, no butter, though the lady assured us she had a “deary” and two cows. Instead of butter, she “hoped we would fix a little relish with our crackers,” in ancient English, eat salt meat and dry biscuits. Such was the fare, and for guests that certainly were intended to be honoured. I could not help recalling the delicious repasts which I remembered to have enjoyed at little dairy farms in England, not possessed, but rented, and at high rents too; where the clean, fresh-coloured, bustling mistress herself skimmed the delicious cream, herself spread the yellow butter on the delightful brown loaf, and placed her curds, and her junket, and all the delicate treasures of her dairy before us, and then, with hospitable pride, placed herself at her board, and added the more delicate “relish” of good tea and good cream. I remembered all this, and did not think the difference atoned for, by the dignity of having my cup handed to me by a slave. The lady I now visited, however, greatly surpassed my quondam friends in the refinement of her conversation. She ambled through the whole time the visit lasted, in a sort of elegantly mincing familiar style of gossip, which, I think, she was imitating from some novel, for I was told she was a great novel reader, and left all household occupations to be performed by her slaves. To say she addressed us in a tone of equality, will give no adequate idea of her manner; I am persuaded that no misgiving on the subject ever entered her head. She told us that their estate was her divi-dend of her father’s property. She had married a first cousin, who was as fine a gentleman as she was a lady, and as idle, preferring hunting (as they called shooting) to any other occupation. The consequence was, that but a very small portion of the dividend was cultivated, and their poverty was extreme. The slaves, particularly the lads, were considerably more than half naked, but the air of dignity with which, in the midst of all this misery, the lanky lady said to one of the young negroes, “Attend to your young master, Lycurgus,” must have been heard to be conceived in the full extent of its mock heroic.
Her female slave set up the large table and put out cups made of rough blue pottery, some brown sugar in one, and a small amount of milk in another, but no butter, even though the lady assured us she had a “deary" and two cows. Instead of butter, she “hoped we would add a little topping with our crackers,” in old-fashioned language, eating salted meat and dry biscuits. This was the meal, for guests who were certainly meant to be honored. I couldn't help thinking back to the wonderful meals I had enjoyed at small dairy farms in England, not owned, but rented, and at high rates too; where the clean, lively, bustling hostess herself skimmed the delicious cream, herself spread the rich butter on the lovely brown bread, and served her curds, junket, and all the delicate treasures of her dairy to us, and then, with proud hospitality, sat at her table and offered the even more refined “topping” of good tea and fresh cream. I remembered all this and didn’t think the difference was balanced by the dignity of having my cup handed to me by a slave. The lady I visited now, however, surpassed my former hosts in the sophistication of her conversation. She chatted throughout the visit in a sort of elegantly dainty familiar gossip style, which I think she was trying to imitate from some novel, as I had heard she was a big reader of novels and left all the household tasks to her slaves. To say she treated us as equals doesn’t fully capture her manner; I’m convinced she never had a doubt about it. She told us that their estate was her share of her father’s property. She had married a first cousin, who was as fine a gentleman as she was a lady, and just as lazy, preferring hunting (as they called shooting) to any other work. The result was that only a small part of the estate was farmed, and they were extremely poor. The slaves, especially the young boys, were more than half naked, but the air of dignity with which the skinny lady said to one of the young black boys, “Attend to your young master, Lycurgus,” must have been heard as something mock-heroic.
Another dwelling of one of these landed proprietors was a hovel as wretched as the one above described, but there was more industry within it. The gentleman, indeed, was himself one of the numerous tribe of regular whiskey drinkers, and was rarely capable of any work; but he had a family of twelve children, who, with their skeleton mother, worked much harder than I ever saw negroes do. They were, accordingly, much less elegant and much less poor than the heiress; yet they lived with no appearance of comfort, and with, I believe, nothing beyond the necessaries of life. One proof of this was, that the worthless father would not suffer them to raise, even by their own labour, any garden vegetables, and they lived upon their fat pork, salt fish, and corn bread, summer and winter, without variation. This, I found, was frequently the case among the farmers. The luxury of whiskey is more appreciated by the men than all the green delicacies from the garden, and if all the ready money goes for that and their darling chewing tobacco, none can be spent by the wife for garden seeds; and as far as my observation extended, I never saw any American menage where the toast and no toast question, would have been decided in favour of the lady.
Another home of one of these landowners was a rundown place as miserable as the one described earlier, but there was more activity inside it. The man himself was part of the many regular whiskey drinkers and was rarely able to do any work; however, he had a family of twelve children who, along with their frail mother, worked much harder than I ever saw people do. They were therefore much less refined and less poor than the heiress; yet they lived with no sign of comfort and, I believe, nothing more than the basics of life. One indication of this was that the useless father wouldn’t let them grow any garden vegetables, even with their own effort, and they survived on their fatty pork, salt fish, and cornbread, summer and winter, without any change. I found this was often the case among farmers. The pleasure of whiskey is valued by the men more than all the fresh greens from the garden, and if all the cash goes toward that and their beloved chewing tobacco, none can be spent by the wife on garden seeds; and from what I observed, I never saw an American household where the question of toast or no toast would have been decided in favor of the woman.
There are some small farmers who hold their lands as tenants, but these are by no means numerous: they do not pay their rent in money, but by making over a third of the produce to the owner; a mode of paying rent, considerably more advantageous to the tenant than the landlord; but the difficulty of obtaining money in payment, excepting for mere retail articles, is very great in all American transactions. “I can pay in pro-duce,” is the offer which I was assured is constantly made on all occasions, and if rejected, “Then I guess we can’t deal,” is the usual rejoinder. This statement does not, of course, include the great merchants of great cities, but refers to the mass of the people scattered over the country; it has, indeed, been my object, in speaking of the customs of the people, to give an idea of what they are generally.
There are some small farmers who rent their land, but they are not very common. They don’t pay their rent in cash; instead, they give a third of their produce to the owner. This arrangement is much more beneficial for the tenant than the landlord. However, getting cash for payments, except for small retail items, is really difficult in all American transactions. “I can pay in produce,” is the offer that I was told is frequently made, and if it’s turned down, the typical response is, “Then I guess we can’t deal.” This observation doesn’t include the big merchants in large cities but refers to the majority of the people spread across the country. My aim in discussing the customs of the people has been to provide a sense of what they are generally like.
The effect produced upon English people by the sight of slavery in every direction is very new, and not very agreeable, and it is not the less painfully felt from hearing upon every breeze the mocking words, “All men are born free and equal.” One must be in the heart of American slavery, fully to appreciate that wonderfully fine passage in Moore’s Epistle to Lord Viscount Forbes, which describes perhaps more faithfully, as well as more powerfully, the political state of America, than any thing that has ever been written upon it.
The impact of seeing slavery everywhere on English people is quite new and not very pleasant, and it becomes even more painful when they hear the mocking words, “All men are born free and equal,” on every breeze. You really have to be in the middle of American slavery to fully appreciate that remarkably powerful line in Moore’s Epistle to Lord Viscount Forbes, which captures the political situation in America more accurately and strongly than anything else written about it.
Oh! Freedom, Freedom, how I hate thy cant!
Not eastern bombast, nor the savage rant
Of purpled madmen, were they numbered all
From Roman Nero, down to Russian Paul,
Could grate upon my ear so mean, so base,
As the rank jargon of that factious race,
Who, poor of heart, and prodigal of words,
Born to be slaves, and struggling to be lords,
But pant for licence, while they spurn controul,
And shout for rights, with rapine in their soul!
Who can, with patience, for a moment see
The medley mass of pride and misery,
Of whips and charters, manacles and rights,
Of slaving blacks, and democratic whites,
Of all the pyebald polity that reigns
In free confusion o’er Columbia’s plains?
To think that man, thou just and gentle God!
Should stand before thee with a tyrant’s rod,
O’er creatures like himself, with soul from thee,
Yet dare to boast of perfect liberty:
Away, away, I’d rather hold my neck
By doubtful tenure from a Sultan’s beck,
In climes where liberty has scarce been named,
Nor any right, but that of ruling, claimed,
Than thus to live, where bastard freedom waves
Her fustian flag in mockery o’er slaves;
Where (motley laws admitting no degree
Betwixt the vilely slaved, and madly free)
Alike the bondage and the licence suit,
The brute made ruler, and the man made brute!
Oh! Freedom, Freedom, how I dislike your nonsense!
Not grand speeches from the East, nor the wild rants
Of crazed tyrants, even if you counted them all
From Roman Nero to Russian Paul,
Could irritate my ears as much, so low, so cheap,
As the foul talk of that divisive group,
Who, lacking spirit and overflowing with words,
Were born to be slaves, yet fight to be rulers,
They yearn for freedom while rejecting control,
And scream for rights, with theft in their hearts!
Who can, with patience, even for a moment see
The chaotic mix of pride and suffering,
Of whips and charters, shackles and rights,
Of enslaved blacks and democratic whites,
Of all the mismatched government that dominates
In free confusion across Columbia’s lands?
To think that a man, you just and kind God!
Should stand before you with a tyrant’s authority,
Over beings like himself, with souls from you,
Yet have the audacity to boast of perfect freedom:
Away, away, I’d rather live with my neck
Under the uncertain command of a Sultan,
In places where liberty has hardly been mentioned,
Where no rights are claimed but the right to rule,
Than to live here, where false freedom flies
Her fake flag in mockery over slaves;
Where (mixed-up laws allowing no distinction
Between the horribly enslaved and the wildly free)
Both bondage and freedom fit just the same,
The beast made ruler, and the man made beast!
The condition of domestic slaves, however, does not generally appear to be bad; but the ugly feature is, that should it be so, they have no power to change it. I have seen much kind attention bestowed upon the health of slaves; but it is on these occasions impossible to forget, that did this attention fail, a valuable piece of property would be endangered. Unhappily the slaves, too, know this, and the consequence is, that real kindly feeling very rarely can exist between the parties. It is said that slaves born in a family are attached to the children of it, who have grown up with them. This may be the case where the petty acts of infant tyranny have not been sufficient to conquer the kindly feeling naturally produced by long and early association; and this sort of attachment may last as long as the slave can be kept in that state of profound ignorance which precludes reflection. The law of Virginia has taken care of this. The State legislators may truly be said to be “wiser in their generation than the children of light,” and they ensure their safety by forbidding light to enter among them. By the law of Virginia it is penal to teach any slave to read, and it is penal to be aiding and abetting in the act of instructing them. This law speaks volumes. Domestic slaves are, generally speaking, tolerably well fed, and decently clothed; and the mode in which they are lodged seems a matter of great indifference to them. They are rarely exposed to the lash, and they are carefully nursed in sickness. These are the favourable features of their situation. The sad one is, that they may be sent to the south and sold. This is the dread of all the slaves north of Louisiana. The sugar plantations, and more than all, the rice grounds of Georgia and the Carolinas, are the terror of American negroes; and well they may be, for they open an early grave to thousands; and to avoid loss it is needful to make their previous labour pay their value.
The situation of domestic slaves doesn’t usually seem too bad, but the troubling part is that if it were, they can’t do anything to change it. I’ve seen a lot of care given to the health of slaves; however, it’s impossible to forget that if this care were to disappear, a valuable piece of property would be at risk. Unfortunately, the slaves are aware of this too, which means real kindness rarely develops between them and the owners. People say that slaves born into a family grow attached to the children they grew up with. This might be true as long as the small acts of cruelty from children don’t completely overshadow the natural bond created by years of early interaction; this kind of attachment might last only as long as the slave remains in a deep ignorance that prevents them from thinking critically. Virginia’s laws have taken care of this. State legislators are indeed “wiser in their time than the enlightened,” ensuring their safety by keeping knowledge away from them. According to Virginia law, it’s illegal to teach any slave to read or to assist someone in doing so. This law says a lot. Generally, domestic slaves are fairly well-fed and decently clothed; they don’t seem to care much about how they are housed. They’re rarely whipped, and they receive careful treatment when sick. Those are the positive aspects of their situation. The grim reality, however, is that they can be sent south and sold. This is what scares all the slaves north of Louisiana. The sugar plantations, and especially the rice fields in Georgia and the Carolinas, are frightening for American blacks; and they have every reason to be scared because they can lead to an early grave for thousands, and to avoid loss, it’s necessary for their earlier work to justify their worth.
There is something in the system of breeding and rearing negroes in the Northern States, for the express purpose of sending them to be sold in the South, that strikes painfully against every feeling of justice, mercy, or common humanity. During my residence in America I became perfectly persuaded that the state of a domestic slave in a gentleman’s family was preferable to that of a hired American “help,” both because they are more cared for and valued, and because their condition being born with them, their spirits do not struggle against it with that pining discontent which seems the lot of all free servants in America. But the case is widely different with such as, in their own persons, or those of their children, “loved in vain,” are exposed to the dreadful traffic above mentioned. In what is their condition better than that of the kidnapped negroes on the coast of Africa? Of the horror in which this enforced migration is held I had a strong proof during our stay in Virginia. The father of a young slave, who belonged to the lady with whom we boarded, was destined to this fate, and within an hour after it was made known to him, he sharpened the hatchet with which he had been felling timber, and with his right hand severed his left from the wrist.
There’s something about the system of breeding and raising Black people in the Northern States, specifically to send them to be sold in the South, that deeply offends every sense of justice, compassion, or basic humanity. During my time in America, I became convinced that the situation of a domestic slave in a gentleman’s household was better than that of a hired American worker, mainly because they are cared for and valued more, and since their condition is something they are born into, they don’t struggle against it with the same lingering discontent that seems to affect all free workers in America. However, the situation is dramatically different for those who, whether for themselves or their children, are “loved in vain” and face the horrific trade mentioned above. How is their condition any better than that of the kidnapped Black people on the coast of Africa? I witnessed the horror surrounding this forced migration during our stay in Virginia. The father of a young slave, who belonged to the woman we were boarding with, was marked for this fate, and within an hour of it becoming known to him, he sharpened the hatchet he had been using to fell trees and, with his right hand, chopped off his left at the wrist.
But this is a subject on which I do not mean to dilate; it has been lately treated most judiciously by a far abler hand.[10] Its effects on the moral feelings and external manners of the people are all I wish to observe upon, and these are unquestionably most injurious. The same man who beards his wealthier and more educated neighbour with the bullying boast, “I’m as good as you,” turns to his slave, and knocks him down, if the furrow he has ploughed, or the log he has felled, please not this stickler for equality. There is a glaring falsehood on the very surface of such a man’s principles that is revolting. It is not among the higher classes that the possession of slaves produces the worst effects. Among the poorer class of landholders, who are often as profoundly ignorant as the negroes they own, the effect of this plenary power over males and females is most demoralising; and the kind of coarse, not to say brutal, authority which is exercised, furnishes the most disgusting moral spectacle I ever witnessed. In all ranks, however, it appeared to me that the greatest and best feelings of the human heart were paralyzed by the relative positions of slave and owner. The characters, the hearts of children, are irretrievably injured by it. In Virginia we boarded for some time in a family consisting of a widow and her four daughters, and I there witnessed a scene strongly indicative of the effect I have mentioned. A young female slave, about eight years of age, had found on the shelf of a cupboard a biscuit, temptingly buttered, of which she had eaten a considerable portion before she was observed. The butter had been copiously sprinkled with arsenic for the destruction of rats, and had been thus most incautiously placed by one of the young ladies of the family. As soon as the circumstance was known, the lady of the house came to consult me as to what had best be done for the poor child; I immediately mixed a large cup of mustard and water (the most rapid of all emetics) and got the little girl to swallow it. The desired effect was instantly produced, but the poor child, partly from nausea, and partly from the terror of hearing her death proclaimed by half a dozen voices round her, trembled so violently that I thought she would fall. I sat down in the court where we were standing, and, as a matter of course, took the little sufferer in my lap. I observed a general titter among the white members of the family, while the black stood aloof, and looked stupified. The youngest of the family, a little girl about the age of the young slave, after gazing at me for a few moments in utter astonishment, exclaimed “My! If Mrs. Trollope has not taken her in her lap, and wiped her nasty mouth! Why I would not have touched her mouth for two hundred dollars!”
But this isn’t a topic I want to elaborate on; it’s been addressed recently by someone much more skilled. Its impact on the moral feelings and behavior of people is all I want to comment on, and it’s undoubtedly harmful. The same person who confronts his wealthier and more educated neighbor with the arrogant claim, “I’m just as good as you,” turns to his slave and hits him if the furrow he has plowed or the log he has chopped doesn’t meet this champion of equality’s standards. There’s a glaring contradiction in such a person’s principles that is shocking. It’s not among the upper classes that owning slaves has the worst repercussions. Among poorer landowners, who are often just as profoundly ignorant as the slaves they own, this complete power over people is incredibly demoralizing; and the rough, if not brutal, authority that’s exercised presents the most appalling moral display I’ve ever seen. In all social classes, though, it seemed to me that the finest and noblest feelings of the human heart were paralyzed by the relationship between slave and owner. The characters and hearts of children are irreparably harmed by it. In Virginia, we stayed for a while with a family made up of a widow and her four daughters, and during that time, I witnessed a scene that strongly illustrated the effect I’ve mentioned. A young female slave, around eight years old, had discovered a biscuit, generously buttered, on a shelf in a cupboard and had eaten a considerable amount before anyone noticed. The butter had been heavily sprinkled with arsenic to kill rats, and it had been carelessly left there by one of the young women in the family. Once the situation was known, the lady of the house came to ask for my advice on what to do for the poor girl; I quickly mixed a large cup of mustard and water (the quickest of all emetics) and got the little girl to drink it. The desired effect was produced immediately, but the poor child, partly from nausea and partly from the fear of hearing her death proclaimed by several voices around her, trembled so violently that I thought she would fall. I sat down in the courtyard where we were standing and naturally held the little sufferer in my lap. I noticed a general giggle among the white members of the family, while the black people stood apart, looking stunned. The youngest girl in the family, about the same age as the young slave, stared at me in complete astonishment and exclaimed, “My! If Mrs. Trollope hasn’t taken her in her lap and wiped her dirty mouth! I wouldn’t touch her mouth for two hundred dollars!”
The little slave was laid on a bed, and I returned to my own apartments; some time afterwards I sent to enquire for her, and learnt that she was in great pain. I immediately went myself to enquire farther, when another young lady of the family, the one by whose imprudence the accident had occurred, met my anxious enquiries with ill-suppressed mirth—told me they had sent for the doctor—and then burst into uncontrollable laughter. The idea of really sympathising in the sufferings of a slave appeared to them as absurd as weeping over a calf that had been slaughtered by the butcher. The daughters of my hostess were as lovely as features and complexion could make them; but the neutralizing effect of this total want of feeling upon youth and beauty, must be witnessed, to be conceived.
The young slave was laid on a bed, and I went back to my own rooms; some time later I sent to check on her and found out she was in a lot of pain. I immediately went to find out more, when another young lady from the family, the one whose carelessness had caused the accident, met my worried questions with barely contained laughter. She told me they had called for the doctor and then burst into uncontrollable giggles. The idea of actually feeling sympathy for a slave's suffering seemed as ridiculous to them as crying over a calf that had been killed by the butcher. The daughters of my hostess were as beautiful as one could be in looks and skin tone; however, the complete lack of empathy they showed had a dulling effect on their youth and beauty that you have to see to truly understand.
There seems in general a strong feeling throughout America, that none of the negro race can be trusted, and as fear, according to their notions, is the only principle by which a slave can be actuated, it is not wonderful if the imputation be just. But I am persuaded that were a different mode of moral treatment pursued, most important and beneficial consequences would result from it. Negroes are very sensible to kindness, and might, I think, be rendered more profitably obedient by the practice of it towards them, than by any other mode of discipline whatever. To emancipate them entirely throughout the Union cannot, I conceive, be thought of, consistently with the safety of the country; but were the possibility of amelioration taken into the consideration of the legislature, with all the wisdom, justice, and mercy, that could be brought to bear upon it, the negro population of the Union might cease to be a terror, and their situation no longer be a subject either of indignation or of pity.
There seems to be a strong belief across America that the entire Black race cannot be trusted, and since fear is the only motive that a slave can understand, it’s not surprising if this assumption is accurate. However, I believe that if a different approach to moral treatment were taken, it could lead to significant and positive outcomes. Black people are very responsive to kindness, and I think they could be made more obedient through this practice than through any other form of discipline. Completely freeing them throughout the country may not be seen as safe, but if the possibility of improvement were considered by lawmakers, with all the wisdom, justice, and compassion they could muster, the Black population in the United States could stop being a source of fear, and their situation would no longer evoke anger or pity.
I observed every where throughout the slave States that all articles which can be taken and consumed are constantly locked up, and in large families, where the extent of the establishment multiplies the number of keys, these are deposited in a basket, and consigned to the care of a little negress, who is constantly seen following her mistress’s steps with this basket on her arm, and this, not only that the keys may be always at hand, but because, should they be out of sight one moment, that moment would infallibly be employed for purposes of plunder. It seemed to me in this instance, as in many others, that the close personal attendance of these sable shadows, must be very annoying; but whenever I mentioned it, I was assured that no such feeling existed, and that use rendered them almost unconscious of their presence.
I noticed everywhere in the slave states that all consumable items are kept locked up, and in larger households, where the number of keys increases, these are stored in a basket that's looked after by a young Black girl. She's often seen following her mistress around with the basket on her arm, not only to keep the keys handy but also because if they were out of sight for even a moment, that moment would definitely be used for stealing. It struck me in this case, as in many others, that having these constant personal attendants must be pretty annoying. But whenever I brought it up, I was told that no one felt that way and that they became so accustomed to their presence that they hardly noticed it.
I had, indeed, frequent opportunities of observing this habitual indifference to the presence of their slaves. They talk of them, of their condition, of their faculties, of their conduct, exactly as if they were incapable of hearing. I once saw a young lady, who, when seated at table between a male and a female, was induced by her modesty to intrude on the chair of her female neighbour to avoid the indelicacy of touching the elbow of a man. I once saw this very young lady lacing her stays with the most perfect composure before a negro footman. A Virginian gentleman told me that ever since he had married, he had been accustomed to have a negro girl sleep in the same chamber with himself and his wife. I asked for what purpose this nocturnal attendance was necessary? “Good heaven!” was the reply, “if I wanted a glass of water during the night, what would become of me?”
I often saw how indifferent they were to the presence of their slaves. They talked about them, their situation, their abilities, and their behavior as if they couldn’t hear a word. I once witnessed a young lady who, when sitting at the table between a man and a woman, was so modest that she shifted her chair to avoid brushing against the man’s elbow. I also saw the same young lady calmly lacing up her corset in front of a black footman. A Virginia gentleman told me that since his marriage, it had been normal for a black girl to sleep in the same room with him and his wife. I asked why this nighttime presence was needed. “Good heavens!” he replied, “if I wanted a glass of water in the night, what would I do?”
CHAPTER XXIII
Fruits and Flowers of Maryland and Virginia—Copper-head Snake—Insects—Elections
Fruits and Flowers of Maryland and Virginia—Copperhead Snake—Insects—Elections
Our summer in Maryland, (1830), was delightful. The thermometer stood at 94, but the heat was by no means so oppressive as what we had felt in the West. In no part of North America are the natural productions of the soil more various, or more beautiful. Strawberries of the richest flavour sprung beneath our feet; and when these past away, every grove, every lane, every field looked like a cherry orchard, offering an inexhaustible profusion of fruit to all who would take the trouble to gather it. Then followed the peaches; every hedgerow was planted with them, and though the fruit did not equal in size or flavour those ripened on our garden walls, we often found them good enough to afford a delicious refreshment on our long rambles. But it was the flowers, and the flowering shrubs that, beyond all else, rendered this region the most beautiful I had ever seen, (the Alleghany always excepted.) No description can give an idea of the variety, the profusion, the luxuriance of them. If I talk of wild roses, the English reader will fancy I mean the pale ephemeral blossoms of our bramble hedges; but the wild roses of Maryland and Virginia might be the choicest favourites of the flower garden. They are rarely very double, but the brilliant eye atones for this. They are of all shades, from the deepest crimson to the tenderest pink. The scent is rich and delicate; in size they exceed any single roses I ever saw, often measuring above four inches in diameter. The leaf greatly resembles that of the china rose; it is large, dark, firm, and brilliant. The sweetbrier grows wild, and blossoms abundantly; both leaves and flowers are considerably larger than with us. The acacia, or as it is there called, the locust, blooms with great richness and profusion; I have gathered a branch less than a foot long, and counted twelve full bunches of flowers on it. The scent is equal to the orange flower. The dogwood is another of the splendid white blossoms that adorn the woods. Its lateral branches are flat, like a fan, and dotted all over, with star-like blossoms, as large as those of the gum-cistus. Another pretty shrub, of smaller size, is the poison alder. It is well that its noxious qualities are very generally known, for it is most tempting to the eye by its delicate fringe-like bunches of white flowers. Even the touch of this shrub is poisonous, and produces violent swelling. The arbor judae is abundant in every wood, and its bright and delicate pink is the earliest harbinger of the American spring. Azalias, white, yellow, and pink; kalmias of every variety, the too sweet magnolia, and the stately rhododendron, all grow in wild abundance there. The plant known in England as the Virginian creeper, is often seen climbing to the top of the highest forest trees, and bearing a large trumpet- shaped blossom of a rich scarlet. The sassafras is a beautiful shrub, and I cannot imagine why it has not been naturalized in England, for it has every appearance of being extremely hardy. The leaves grow in tufts, and every tuft contains leaves of five or six different forms. The fruit is singularly beautiful; it resembles in form a small acorn, and is jet black; the cup and stem looking as if they were made of red coral. The graceful and fantastic grapevine is a feature of great beauty, and its wandering festoons bear no more resemblance to our well-trained vines, than our stunted azalias, and tiny magnolias, to their thriving American kindred.
Our summer in Maryland, (1830), was wonderful. The thermometer reached 94, but the heat was nowhere near as intense as what we had experienced in the West. In no other part of North America are the natural resources of the land more varied or more beautiful. Delicious strawberries grew all around us; and when they were gone, every grove, every lane, every field looked like a cherry orchard, offering an endless supply of fruit for anyone willing to pick it. Then came the peaches; every hedgerow was filled with them, and although they weren't as large or flavorful as those ripe from our garden walls, we often found them tasty enough to enjoy as a refreshing snack on our long walks. But it was the flowers and flowering shrubs that, more than anything else, made this area the most beautiful I had ever seen, (except for the Alleghany.) No description can capture the variety, abundance, and lushness of them. If I mention wild roses, an English reader might think of the pale temporary blooms from our bramble hedges; but the wild roses of Maryland and Virginia could easily be the prized favorites of any flower garden. They are usually not very full, but their vibrant colors make up for it. They come in all shades, from the deepest crimson to the softest pink. Their scent is rich and delicate; they are larger than any single roses I've ever seen, often measuring more than four inches across. The leaves are very similar to those of the china rose; they are large, dark, sturdy, and bright. The sweetbriar grows wild and blooms profusely; its leaves and flowers are considerably bigger than those we have. The acacia, or what they call locust there, blooms abundantly; I picked a branch less than a foot long and counted twelve full clusters of flowers on it. Its scent rivals that of orange blossoms. The dogwood is another of the stunning white flowers that decorate the woods. Its side branches are flat, like a fan, and covered in star-like blossoms, as large as those from the gum-cistus. Another attractive, smaller shrub is the poison alder. It's good that its harmful effects are widely known because it is very tempting to the eye with its delicate, fringe-like clusters of white flowers. Even touching this shrub is poisonous, leading to severe swelling. The arbor judae is plentiful in every wood, and its bright, delicate pink is the first sign of American spring. Azaleas, in white, yellow, and pink; kalmias of every kind, the overly sweet magnolia, and the majestic rhododendron, all grow wildly abundant there. The plant known in England as the Virginian creeper can often be seen climbing to the tops of the tallest forest trees, bearing large trumpet-shaped flowers in rich scarlet. The sassafras is a lovely shrub, and I can’t understand why it hasn’t been naturalized in England; it appears to be incredibly hardy. The leaves grow in clusters, and each cluster contains leaves in five or six different shapes. The fruit is uniquely beautiful; it looks like a small acorn and is jet black, with the cup and stem resembling red coral. The graceful, whimsical grapevine adds great beauty, and its sprawling vines look nothing like our well-cultivated vines, just as our stunted azaleas and tiny magnolias look nothing like their thriving American relatives.
There is another charm that haunts the summer wanderer in America, and it is perhaps the only one found in greatest perfection in the West: but it is beautiful every where. In a bright day, during any of the summer months, your walk is through an atmosphere of butterflies, so gaudy in hue, and so varied in form, that I often thought they looked like flowers on the wing. Some of them are very large, measuring three or four inches across the wings; but many, and I think the most beautiful, are smaller than ours. Some have wings of the most dainty lavender colour; and bodies of black; others are fawn and rose colour; and others again are orange and bright blue. But pretty as they are, it is their number, even more than their beauty, that delights the eye. Their gay and noiseless movement as they glance through the air, crossing each other in chequered maze, is very beautiful. The humming-bird is another pretty summer toy; but they are not sufficiently numerous, nor do they live enough on the wing to render them so important a feature in the transatlantic show, as the rainbow-tinted butterflies. The fire-fly was a far more brilliant novelty. In moist situations, or before a storm, they are very numerous, and in the dark sultry evening of a burning day, when all employment was impossible, I have often found it a pastime to watch their glancing light, now here, now there; now seen, now gone; shooting past with the rapidity of lightning, and looking like a shower of falling stars, blown about in the breeze of evening.
There’s another charm that captivates the summer traveler in America, and it’s perhaps found in its most perfect form in the West, though it’s beautiful everywhere. On a bright day during the summer months, your walk unfolds in an atmosphere filled with butterflies, so vibrant in color and diverse in shape that they often look like flowers in the air. Some of them are quite large, with wings measuring three to four inches across, but many, and I believe the most beautiful, are smaller than ours. Some have wings in delicate lavender and bodies that are black; others are fawn and rose-colored; and still others are orange and bright blue. But as pretty as they are, it’s their sheer numbers, even more than their beauty, that delights the eye. Their cheerful and silent movement as they flit through the air, weaving in and out of each other in a playful pattern, is truly beautiful. The hummingbird is another lovely summer sight, but they aren’t numerous enough, nor do they stay in the air long enough, to be a significant part of the transatlantic spectacle, like the rainbow-hued butterflies. The firefly, on the other hand, is a much more brilliant novelty. In damp areas or before a storm, they are quite plentiful, and on the dark, humid evenings of scorching days, when no work is possible, I’ve often found it enjoyable to watch their flickering light, appearing here and there; now visible, now gone; darting by with the speed of lightning, resembling a shower of falling stars swirling in the evening breeze.
In one of our excursions we encountered and slew a copperhead snake. I escaped treading on it by about three inches. While we were contemplating our conquered foe, and doubting in our ignorance if he were indeed the deadly copper-head we had so often heard described, a farmer joined us, who, as soon as he cast his eyes on our victim, exclaimed, “My! if you have not got a copper. That’s right down well done, they be darnation beasts.” He told us that he had once seen a copper-head bite himself to death, from being teazed by a stick, while confined in a cage where he could find no other victim. We often heard terrible accounts of the number of these desperate reptiles to be found on the rocks near the great falls of the Potomac; but not even the terror these stories inspired could prevent our repeated visits to that sublime scene; Luckily our temerity was never punished by seeing any there. Lizards, long, large, and most hideously like a miniature crocodile, I frequently saw, gliding from the fissures of the rocks, and darting again under shelter, perhaps beneath the very stone I was seated upon; but every one assured us they were harmless. Animal life is so infinitely abundant, and in forms so various, and so novel to European eyes, that it is absolutely necessary to divest oneself of all the petty terrors which the crawling, creeping, hopping, and buzzing tribes can inspire, before taking an American summer ramble. It is, I conceive, quite impossible for any description to convey an idea of the sounds which assail the ears from the time the short twilight begins, until the rising sun scatters the rear of darkness, and sends the winking choristers to rest.
On one of our trips, we came across and killed a copperhead snake. I narrowly missed stepping on it by about three inches. While we were considering our defeated foe and unsure if it was really the deadly copperhead we had often heard about, a farmer joined us. As soon as he saw our catch, he exclaimed, “Wow! You’ve got a copperhead. That’s really well done; they’re downright awful creatures.” He told us that he once saw a copperhead bite itself to death after being teased with a stick while trapped in a cage with no other targets. We often heard scary stories about the number of these dangerous snakes lurking on the rocks near the great falls of the Potomac, but even the fear those tales inspired couldn’t stop us from making repeated visits to that stunning location. Luckily, our boldness was never punished with a sighting of one there. I frequently saw long, large lizards that looked eerily like tiny crocodiles, slithering out from the cracks in the rocks and darting back under cover, perhaps even right beneath the stone I was sitting on; but everyone assured us they were harmless. Animal life is so incredibly abundant, taking on so many different forms that are novel to European eyes, that it’s absolutely necessary to shake off all the little fears inspired by the crawling, creeping, hopping, and buzzing creatures before going on a summer stroll in America. I believe it’s quite impossible for any description to capture the sounds that bombard your ears from the moment twilight begins until the rising sun chases away the darkness and sends the singing critters to rest.
Be where you will (excepting in the large cities) the appalling note of the bull-frog will reach you, loud, deep, and hoarse, issuing from a thousand throats in ceaseless continuity of croak. The tree-frog adds her chirping and almost human voice; the kattiedid repeats her own name through the livelong night; the whole tribe of locusts chirp, chirrup, squeak, whiz, and whistle, without allowing one instant of interval to the weary ear; and when to this the mosquito adds her threatening hum, it is wonderful that any degree of fatigue can obtain for the listener the relief of sleep. In fact, it is only in ceasing to listen that this blessing can be found. I passed many feverish nights during my first summer, literally in listening to this most astounding mixture of noises, and it was only when they became too familiar to excite attention, that I recovered my rest.
No matter where you are (except in the big cities), the loud, deep, and hoarse croak of the bullfrog will reach you, coming from a thousand throats in an endless chorus. The tree frog adds her chirping and almost human voice; the katydid repeats her name all night long; and the whole crowd of locusts chirp, chirrup, squeak, whiz, and whistle, giving the tired ear no break. And when the mosquito adds her annoying hum, it's amazing that anyone can get any sleep at all. In fact, the only way to find that blessing is to stop listening. I spent many restless nights during my first summer just listening to this incredible mix of sounds, and it was only when they became so familiar that they stopped grabbing my attention that I was able to rest.
I know not by what whimsical link of association the recapitulation of this insect din suggests the recollection of other discords, at least as harsh and much more troublesome.
I don't know why the memory of this noisy insect buzz reminds me of other unpleasant sounds, which are just as jarring and even more annoying.
Even in the retirement in which we passed this summer, we were not beyond reach of the election fever which is constantly raging through the land. Had America every attraction under heaven that nature and social enjoyment can offer, this electioneering madness would make me fly it in disgust. It engrosses every conversation, it irritates every temper, it substitutes party spirit for personal esteem; and, in fact, vitiates the whole system of society.
Even during the time we spent relaxing this summer, we couldn't escape the election frenzy that's always sweeping through the country. Even if America had every beauty and joy that nature and society could provide, this campaigning madness would make me want to leave in disgust. It takes over every conversation, frustrates everyone, replaces personal respect with party loyalty, and really messes up the entire social system.
When a candidate for any office starts, his party endow him with every virtue, and with all the talents. They are all ready to peck out the eyes of those who oppose him, and in the warm and mettlesome south-western states, do literally often perform this operation: but as soon as he succeeds, his virtues and his talents vanish, and, excepting those holding office under his appointment, every man Jonathan of them set off again full gallop to elect his successor. When I first arrived in America Mr. John Quincy Adams was President, and it was impossible to doubt, even from the statement of his enemies, that he was every way calculated to do honour to the office. All I ever heard against him was, that “he was too much of a gentleman;” but a new candidate must be set up, and Mr. Adams was out-voted for no other reason, that I could learn, but because it was “best to change.” “Jackson for ever!” was, therefore, screamed from the majority of mouths, both drunk and sober, till he was elected; but no sooner in his place, than the same ceaseless operation went on again, with “Clay for ever” for its war-whoop.
When a candidate for any office starts, his party gives him every virtue and all the skills. They are ready to attack anyone who opposes him, and in the warm and spirited southwestern states, they often literally do just that. But as soon as he succeeds, his virtues and talents disappear, and except for those holding office under his appointment, everyone else rushes off at full speed to elect his successor. When I first arrived in America, Mr. John Quincy Adams was President, and it was clear, even from what his enemies said, that he was well-suited for the position. The only criticism I heard against him was that “he was too much of a gentleman;” but a new candidate had to be brought forth, and Mr. Adams was voted out, not for any reason I could find, but simply because it was “time for a change.” “Jackson forever!” was the rallying cry from the majority, both drunk and sober, until he was elected; but as soon as he took office, the same relentless process started again, this time with “Clay forever” as the battle cry.
I was one morning paying a visit, when a party of gentlemen arrived at the same house on horseback. The one whose air proclaimed him the chief of his party, left us not long in doubt as to his business, for he said, almost in entering,
I was visiting one morning when a group of men rode up to the same house on horseback. The one who clearly seemed to be their leader didn't keep us guessing about his intentions for long, as he said almost immediately upon entering,
“Mr. P—, I come to ask for your vote.”
“Mr. P—, I'm here to ask for your vote.”
“Who are you for, sir?” was the reply.
“Who are you for, sir?” was the reply.
“Clay for ever!” the rejoinder; and the vote was promised.
“Clay forever!” came the response, and the vote was assured.
This gentleman was candidate for a place in the state representation, whose members have a vote in the presidential election.
This man was a candidate for a position in the state legislature, whose members vote in the presidential election.
I was introduced to him as an English woman: he addressed me with, “Well madam, you see we do these things openly and above-board here; you mince such matters more, I expect.”
I was introduced to him as an English woman: he said to me, “Well madam, you see we do these things openly and honestly here; you handle these matters more delicately, I assume.”
After his departure, his history and standing were discussed. “Mr. M. is highly respectable, and of very good standing; there can be no doubt of his election if he is a thorough-going Clay-man,” said my host.
After he left, people talked about his background and reputation. “Mr. M. is very respectable and well-regarded; there’s no doubt he’ll be elected if he’s a solid supporter of Clay,” said my host.
I asked what his station was.
I asked what his role was.
The lady of the house told me that his father had been a merchant, and when this future legislator was a young man, he had been sent by him to some port in the Mediterranean as his super-cargo. The youth, being a free-born high-spirited youth, appropriated the proceeds to his own uses, traded with great success upon the fund thus obtained, and returned, after an absence of twelve years, a gentleman of fortune and excellent standing. I expressed some little disapprobation of this proceeding, but was assured that Mr. M. was considered by every one as a very “honourable man.”
The lady of the house told me that his father had been a merchant, and when this future politician was young, he was sent by his dad to some port in the Mediterranean as his supercargo. The young man, being spirited and free-spirited, took the proceeds for himself, traded successfully with the funds he acquired, and returned after twelve years as a wealthy gentleman of good standing. I expressed a bit of disapproval about this, but I was assured that Mr. M. was considered by everyone to be a very "honorable man."
Were I to relate one-tenth part of the dishonest transactions recounted to me by Americans, of their fellow-citizens and friends, I am confident that no English reader would give me credit for veracity it would, therefore, be very unwise to repeat them, but I cannot refrain from expressing the opinion that nearly four years of attentive observation impressed on me, namely, that the moral sense is on every point blunter than with us. Make an American believe that his next-door neighbour is a very worthless fellow, and I dare say (if he were quite sure he could make nothing by him) he would drop the acquaintance; but as to what constitutes a worthless fellow, people differ on the opposite sides of the Atlantic, almost by the whole decalogue. There is, as it appeared to me, an obtusity on all points of honourable feeling.
If I were to share even a fraction of the dishonest things Americans have told me about their fellow citizens and friends, I’m sure no English reader would believe I'm being truthful. So, it would be very foolish to repeat them. However, I can't help but express my opinion formed over nearly four years of careful observation: the moral compass here seems much duller than ours. If an American believes their neighbor is a terrible person, I bet (if they were sure they wouldn't gain anything from the relationship) they would cut ties with them. But regarding what makes someone a terrible person, opinions differ drastically between the two sides of the Atlantic, almost along the lines of the entire Ten Commandments. From my perspective, there seems to be a lack of sensitivity to all matters of honorable feelings.
“Cervantes laughed Spain’s chivalry away,” but he did not laugh away that better part of chivalry, so beautifully described by Burke as “the unbought grace of life, the cheap defence of nations, that chastity of honour, which feels a stain as a wound, which ennobles whatever it touches, and by which vice itself loses half its evil, by losing all its grossness.” The better part of chivalry still mixes with gentle blood in every part of Europe, nor is it less fondly guarded than when sword and buckler aided its defence. Perhaps this unbought grace of life is not to be looked for where chivalry has never been. I certainly do not lament the decadence of knight errantry, nor wish to exchange the protection of the laws for that of the doughtiest champion who ever set lance in rest; but I do, in truth, believe that this knightly sensitiveness of honourable feeling is the best antidote to the petty soul-degrading transactions of every day life, and that the total want of it, is one reason why this free-born race care so very little for the vulgar virtue called probity.
“Cervantes laughed away Spain’s chivalry,” but he didn’t laugh away that better part of chivalry, beautifully described by Burke as “the unbought grace of life, the cheap defense of nations, that purity of honor, which feels a stain like a wound, which ennobles whatever it touches, and by which vice itself loses half its evil, by losing all its crudeness.” The better part of chivalry still mingles with noble blood in every part of Europe, and it’s no less cherished than when sword and shield helped protect it. Perhaps this unbought grace of life is not to be found where chivalry has never existed. I certainly don’t mourn the decline of knight errantry, nor do I wish to trade the protection of the laws for that of the bravest champion who ever took up a lance; but I truly believe that this knightly sensitivity to honorable feelings is the best remedy to the petty, soul-degrading transactions of everyday life, and that the complete absence of it is one reason why this free-born race cares so little for the mundane virtue known as honesty.
CHAPTER XXIV
Journey to Philadelphia—Chesapeak and Delaware Canal—City of Philadelphia—Miss Wright’s Lecture
Journey to Philadelphia—Chesapeake and Delaware Canal—City of Philadelphia—Miss Wright’s Lecture
In the latter part of August, 1830, we paid a visit to Philadelphia, and, notwithstanding the season, we were so fortunate as to have both bright and temperate weather for the expedition. The road from Washington to Baltimore, which was our first day’s journey, is interesting in summer from the variety of luxuriance of the foliage which borders great parts of it.
In the late August of 1830, we visited Philadelphia, and despite the time of year, we were lucky to have both clear and mild weather for our trip. The route from Washington to Baltimore, which was our first day's travel, is appealing in the summer because of the lush greenery that lines much of it.
We passed the night at Baltimore, and embarked next morning on board a steam-boat for Philadelphia. The scenery of the Elk river, upon which you enter soon after leaving the port of Baltimore, is not beautiful. We embarked at six in the morning, and at twelve reached the Chesapeak and Delaware canal; we then quitted the steam-boat, and walked two or three hundred yards to the canal, where we got on board a pretty little decked boat, sheltered by a neat awning, and drawn by four horses. This canal cuts across the state of Delaware, and connects the Chesapeak and Delaware rivers: it has been a work of great expense, though the distance is not more than thirteen miles; for a considerable part of this distance the cutting has been very deep, and the banks are in many parts thatched, to prevent their crumbling. At the point where the cutting is deepest, a light bridge is thrown across, which, from its great height, forms a striking object to the travellers passing below it. Every boat that passes this canal pays a toll of twenty dollars.
We spent the night in Baltimore and got on a steamboat the next morning for Philadelphia. The scenery on the Elk River, which you enter soon after leaving Baltimore, isn't exactly beautiful. We set off at six in the morning and reached the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal by noon. Then we left the steamboat and walked a couple of hundred yards to the canal, where we boarded a charming little decked boat, shaded by a nice awning, and pulled by four horses. This canal runs through Delaware and connects the Chesapeake and Delaware rivers. It has cost a lot to build, even though the distance is only about thirteen miles; for much of this distance, the digging has been quite deep, and in many areas the banks are thatched to prevent erosion. At the deepest point, there's a light bridge that towers above, creating a striking sight for travelers passing underneath. Every boat that uses this canal pays a toll of twenty dollars.
Nothing can be less interesting than that part of the state of Delaware through which this cut passes, the Mississippi hardly excepted. At one, we reached the Delaware river, at a point nearly opposite Delaware Fort, which looks recently built, and is very handsome. [This fort was destroyed by fire a few months afterwards.] Here we again changed our vessel, and got on board another of their noble steam-boats; both these changes were made with the greatest regularity and dispatch.
Nothing is less interesting than that part of Delaware that this cut goes through, not even the Mississippi. At one point, we reached the Delaware River, almost directly across from Delaware Fort, which looks newly built and is quite attractive. [This fort was destroyed by fire a few months later.] Here, we switched vessels again and boarded another one of their impressive steamboats; both changes were made with the utmost efficiency and speed.
There is nothing remarkable in the scenery of the Delaware. The stream is wide and the banks are flat; a short distance before you reach Philadelphia two large buildings of singular appearance strike the eye. On enquiry I learnt that they were erected for the purpose of sheltering two ships of war. They are handsomely finished, with very neat roofs, and are ventilated by many windows. The expense of these buildings must have been considerable, but, as the construction of the vast machines they shelter was more so, it may be good economy.
There’s nothing special about the scenery of the Delaware. The river is wide, and the banks are flat; just before you get to Philadelphia, two large, unusual buildings catch your eye. When I asked about them, I found out they were built to shelter two warships. They’re nicely finished, with well-designed roofs, and have plenty of windows for ventilation. The cost of these buildings must have been significant, but since building the massive ships they house was even more expensive, it might be smart spending.
We reached Philadelphia at four o’clock in the afternoon. The approach to this city is not so striking as that to Baltimore; though much larger, it does not now show itself so well; it wants domes and columns: it is, nevertheless, a beautiful city. Nothing can exceed its neatness; the streets are well paved, the foot-way, as in all the old American cities, is of brick, like the old pantile walk at Tunbridge Wells. This is almost entirely sheltered from the sun by the awnings, which, in all the principal streets, are spread from the shop windows to the edge of the pavement.
We arrived in Philadelphia at four o’clock in the afternoon. The view of this city isn’t as impressive as that of Baltimore; even though it’s much bigger, it doesn’t present itself as clearly now; it lacks domes and columns. Still, it’s a beautiful city. You can't beat its cleanliness; the streets are well paved, and the sidewalks, like in all the old American cities, are made of brick, similar to the old pantile walk at Tunbridge Wells. Almost all of it is shielded from the sun by awnings that extend from shop windows to the edge of the sidewalk along the main streets.
The city is built with extreme and almost wearisome regularity; the streets, which run north and south, are distinguished by numbers, from one to—I know not how many, but I paid a visit in Twelth Street; these are intersected at right angles by others, which are known by the names of various trees; Mulberry (more commonly called Arch-street), Chesnut, and Walnut, appear the most fashionable: in each of these there is a theatre. This mode of distinguishing the streets is commodious to strangers, from the facility it gives of finding out whereabouts you are; if you ask for the United States Bank, you are told it is in Chesnut, between Third and Fourth, and as the streets are all divided from each other by equal distances, of about three hundred feet, you are sure of not missing your mark. There are many handsome houses, but none that are very splendid; they are generally of brick, and those of the better order have white marble steps, and some few, door frames of the same beautiful material; but, on the whole, there is less display of it in the private dwellings than at Baltimore.
The city is laid out with such strict and almost exhausting regularity; the streets that run north and south are numbered from one to—I’m not sure how many, but I visited Twelfth Street; these are crossed at right angles by others named after different trees; Mulberry (more often called Arch Street), Chestnut, and Walnut are the most popular: there’s a theater on each of these streets. This way of naming the streets is handy for newcomers, as it makes it easy to figure out where you are; if you ask where the United States Bank is, you’ll be told it’s on Chestnut, between Third and Fourth, and since the streets are all spaced equally, about three hundred feet apart, you’re sure not to miss it. There are many attractive houses, but none that are particularly extravagant; they’re mostly made of brick, and the nicer ones have white marble steps, with a few featuring door frames made of the same lovely material; however, overall, there’s less showy design in the private homes than in Baltimore.
The Americans all seem greatly to admire this city, and to give it the preference in point of beauty to all others in the Union, but I do not agree with them. There are some very handsome buildings, but none of them so placed as to produce a striking effect, as is the case both with the Capitol and the President’s house, at Washington. Notwithstanding these fine buildings, one or more of which are to be found in all the principal streets, the coup d’oeil is every where the same. There is no Place de Louis Quinze or Carrousel, no Regent Street, or Green Park, to make one exclaim “how beautiful!” all is even, straight, uniform, and uninteresting.
The Americans all seem to really admire this city and prefer its beauty over all others in the Union, but I don't agree. There are some very nice buildings, but none of them are positioned to create a striking effect like the Capitol and the President’s house in Washington do. Despite these impressive buildings, which can be found on all the main streets, the view everywhere is the same. There’s no Place de Louis Quinze or Carrousel, no Regent Street or Green Park, that makes you exclaim, “how beautiful!” Everything is even, straight, uniform, and uninteresting.
There is one spot, however, about a mile from the town, which presents a lovely scene. The water-works of Philadelphia have not yet perhaps as wide extended fame as those of Marley, but they are not less deserving it. At a most beautiful point of the Schuylkill River the water has been forced up into a magnificent reservoir, ample and elevated enough to send it through the whole city. The vast yet simple machinery by which this is achieved is open to the public, who resort in such numbers to see it, that several evening stages run from Philadelphia to Fair Mount for their accommodation. But interesting and curious as this machinery is, Fair Mount would not be so attractive had it not something else to offer. It is, in truth, one of the very prettiest spots the eye can look upon. A broad weir is thrown across the Schuylkill, which produces the sound and look of a cascade. On the farther side of the river is a gentleman’s seat, the beautiful lawns of which slope to the water’s edge, and groups of weeping-willows and other trees throw their shadows on the stream. The works themselves are enclosed in a simple but very handsome building of freestone, which has an extended front opening upon a terrace, which overhangs the river: behind the building, and divided from it only by a lawn, rises a lofty wall of solid limestone rock, which has, at one or two points, been cut into, for the passage of the water into the noble reservoir above. From the crevices of this rock the catalpa was every where pushing forth, covered with its beautiful blossom. Beneath one of these trees an artificial opening in the rock gives passage to a stream of water, clear and bright as crystal, which is received in a stone basin of simple workmanship, having a cup for the service of the thirsty traveller. At another point, a portion of the water in its upward way to the reservoir, is permitted to spring forth in a perpetual jet d’eau, that returns in a silver shower upon the head of a marble naiad of snowy whiteness. The statue is not the work of Phidias, but its dark, rocky background, the flowery catalpas which shadow it, and the bright shower through which it shows itself, altogether make the scene one of singular beauty; add to which, the evening on which I saw it was very sultry, and the contrast of this cool spot to all besides certainly enhanced its attraction; it was impossible not to envy the nymph her eternal shower-bath.
There is one place, though, about a mile from the town, that offers a lovely view. The waterworks of Philadelphia might not yet be as famous as those of Marley, but they definitely deserve recognition. At a stunning point along the Schuylkill River, water has been pumped up into a magnificent reservoir, large and high enough to supply the entire city. The vast yet straightforward machinery used for this is open to the public, drawing so many visitors that multiple evening buses run from Philadelphia to Fairmount for their convenience. But as interesting and intriguing as this machinery is, Fairmount wouldn't be as appealing if it didn't have something else to offer. It truly is one of the prettiest places you can see. A wide weir spans the Schuylkill, creating the sound and appearance of a waterfall. On the other side of the river is a beautiful estate, with lovely lawns sloping down to the water's edge, and clusters of weeping willows and other trees casting their shadows on the stream. The waterworks themselves are housed in a simple yet elegant freestone building, which features a long front that opens onto a terrace overlooking the river: behind the building, separated only by a lawn, rises a tall wall of solid limestone rock, which has been partially carved out at one or two spots to allow the water to flow into the grand reservoir above. From the crevices of this rock, catalpas are everywhere blooming beautifully. Under one of these trees, an artificial opening in the rock lets a clear, bright stream of water flow, collected in a stone basin with a simple design that has a cup for thirsty travelers. At another point, a section of water on its way to the reservoir is allowed to burst forth in a perpetual jet d’eau, cascading down in a silver shower onto the head of a marble naiad pure as snow. The statue isn't the work of Phidias, but the dark rocky backdrop, the flowery catalpas that shade it, and the bright shower creating a striking scene; plus, the evening I saw it was really hot, and the coolness of this spot compared to everything else certainly made it even more inviting; it was hard not to envy the nymph her constant shower.
On returning from this excursion we saw handbills in all parts of the city announcing that Miss Wright was on that evening to deliver her parting address to the citizens of Philadelphia, at the Arch Street theatre, previous to her departure for Europe. I immediately determined to hear her, and did so, though not without some difficulty, from the crowds who went thither with the same intention. The house, which is a very pretty one, was filled in every part, including the stage, with a well dressed and most attentive audience. There was a larger proportion of ladies present than I ever saw on any other occasion in an American theatre. One reason for this might be, perhaps, that they were admitted gratis.
On returning from this trip, we saw flyers all over the city announcing that Miss Wright would be giving her farewell speech to the citizens of Philadelphia that evening at the Arch Street Theatre before heading to Europe. I decided right away that I wanted to attend, although it wasn't easy due to the crowds who had the same idea. The venue, which is quite lovely, was packed, even the stage, with a well-dressed and very attentive audience. There were more women present than I've ever seen at any other American theater. One reason for this might be that they were admitted for free.
Miss Wright came on the stage surrounded by a body guard of Quaker ladies, in the full costume of their sect. She was, as she always is, startling in her theories, but powerfully eloquent, and, on the whole, was much applauded, though one passage produced great emotion, and some hissing. She stated broadly, on the authority of Jefferson, furnished by his posthumous works, that “Washington was not a Christian.” One voice from the crowded pit exclaimed, in an accent of indignation, “Washington was a Christian.” but it was evident that the majority of the audience considered Mr. Jefferson’s assertion as a compliment to the country’s idol, for the hissing was soon triumphantly clapped down. General Washington himself, however, gives a somewhat different account of his own principles, for in his admirable farewell address on declining a re-election to the Presidency, I find the following passage.
Miss Wright stepped onto the stage, surrounded by a group of Quaker ladies dressed in their traditional attire. She was, as always, surprising in her theories, but incredibly articulate, and overall, she received a lot of applause, even though one part of her speech triggered strong emotions and some hissing. She openly stated, based on Jefferson's posthumous works, that “Washington was not a Christian.” A voice from the packed audience shouted in outrage, “Washington was a Christian,” but it was clear that most of the audience viewed Jefferson’s statement as praise for the nation’s hero, as the hissing was quickly drowned out by applause. General Washington himself, however, gives a somewhat different account of his own beliefs, for in his remarkable farewell address when he declined re-election to the presidency, I find the following passage.
“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who would labour to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the destinies of men and citizens. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”
“Of all the traits and habits that contribute to political success, religion and morality are essential foundations. It would be pointless for someone to claim to be a patriot while trying to undermine these key pillars of human happiness, which are the strongest supports for the futures of individuals and citizens. A book couldn’t capture all the ways they connect to personal and public well-being. And we should be careful to assume that morality can exist without religion; reason and experience both tell us that national morality can't thrive without a basis in religious principles.”
Whether Mr. Jefferson or himself knew best what his principles were, I will not decide, but, at least, it appears fair, when repeating one statement, to add the other also.
Whether Mr. Jefferson or he knew best what his principles were, I won't decide, but at least it seems fair, when stating one opinion, to include the other too.
CHAPTER XXV
Washington Square—American Beauty—Gallery of Fine Arts—Antiques—Theatres—Museum
Washington Square—American Beauty—Gallery of Fine Arts—Antiques—Theatres—Museum
Our mornings were spent, as all travellers’ mornings must be, in asking questions, and in seeing all that the answers told us it was necessary to see. Perhaps this can be done in no city with more facility than in Philadelphia; you have nothing to do but to walk up one straight street, and down another, till all the parallelograms have been threaded. In doing this you will see many things worth looking at. The United States, and Pennsylvania banks, are the most striking buildings, and are both extremely handsome, being of white marble, and built after Grecian models. The State House has nothing externally to recommend it, but the room shown as that in which the declaration of independence was signed, and in which the estimable Lafayette was received half a century after he had shed his noble blood in aiding to obtain it, is an interesting spot. At one end of this room is a statue in wood of General Washington; on its base is the following inscription:-
Our mornings were spent, like all travelers' mornings should be, asking questions and seeing everything the answers led us to. This is perhaps easier to do in Philadelphia than in any other city; you just need to walk up one straight street and down another until you've covered all the blocks. In doing so, you'll come across many interesting sights. The United States and Pennsylvania banks are the most impressive buildings, both very beautiful, made of white marble, and designed in a Grecian style. The State House doesn't have much to recommend it from the outside, but the room where the Declaration of Independence was signed, and where the esteemed Lafayette was welcomed fifty years later after he bravely helped secure it, is a notable place. At one end of this room, there is a wooden statue of General Washington; on its base is the following inscription:-
First in Peace,
First in War,
and
First in the hearts of his Countrymen.
First in peace,
First in war,
and
First in the hearts of his countrymen.
There is a very pretty enclosure before the Walnut Street entrance to the State House, with good well-kept gravel walks, and many of their beautiful flowering trees. It is laid down in grass, not in turf; that, indeed, is a luxury I never saw in America. Near this enclosure is another of much the same description, called Washington Square. Here there was an excellent crop of clover; but as the trees are numerous, and highly beautiful, and several commodious seats are placed beneath their shade, it is, in spite of the long grass, a very agreeable retreat from heat and dust. It was rarely, however, that I saw any of these seats occupied; the Americans have either no leisure, or no inclination for those moments of delassement that all other people, I believe, indulge in. Even their drams, so universally taken by rich and poor, are swallowed standing, and, excepting at church, they never have the air of leisure or repose. This pretty Washington Square is surrounded by houses on three sides, but (lasso!) has a prison on the fourth; it is nevertheless the nearest approach to a London square that is to be found in Philadelphia.
There’s a nice little area in front of the Walnut Street entrance to the State House, featuring well-maintained gravel paths and many beautiful flowering trees. It's covered in grass, not turf; that’s something I’ve never seen in America. Next to this area is another similar space called Washington Square. It has an excellent patch of clover, but since there are lots of beautiful trees and plenty of comfortable seating in their shade, it’s a pleasant escape from the heat and dust, despite the tall grass. However, I rarely saw any of those seats occupied; Americans seem to have neither the time nor the inclination for those moments of relaxation that I believe people in other countries enjoy. Even their drinks, universally consumed by both rich and poor, are taken while standing, and except for at church, they never give the impression of leisure or rest. This lovely Washington Square is surrounded by buildings on three sides, but, unfortunately, there’s a prison on the fourth; yet, it’s still the closest thing to a London square you’ll find in Philadelphia.
One evening, while the rest of my party went to visit some objects which I had before seen, I agreed to await their return in this square, and sat down under a magnificent catalpa, which threw its fragrant blossoms in all directions; the other end of the bench was occupied by a young lady, who was employed in watching the gambols of a little boy. There was something in her manner of looking at me, and exchanging a smile when her young charge performed some extraordinary feat of activity on the grass, that persuaded me she was not an American. I do not remember who spoke first, but we were presently in a full flow of conversation. She spoke English with elegant correctness, but she was a German, and with an ardour of feeling which gave her a decidedly foreign air in Philadelphia, she talked to me of her country, of all she had left, and of all she had found, or rather of all she had not found, for thus ran her lament:-
One evening, while the rest of my group went to check out some things I had seen before, I decided to wait for them in this square. I sat down under a beautiful catalpa tree that was dropping its fragrant blossoms all around. The other end of the bench was taken by a young woman who was watching a little boy play. There was something in the way she looked at me and smiled when the boy did some impressive trick on the grass that made me think she wasn’t American. I don't remember who started the conversation, but soon we were chatting away. She spoke English with elegant precision, but she was German. With a passionate expression that definitely gave her a foreign vibe in Philadelphia, she talked to me about her home, everything she had left behind, and everything she had found, or rather everything she hadn’t found, because this was how her lament went:
“They do not love music. Oh no! and they never amuse themselves—no; and their hearts are not warm, at least they seem not so to strangers; and they have no ease, no forgetfulness of business and of care—no, not for a moment. But I will not stay long, I think, for I should not live.” She told me that she had a brother settled there as a merchant, and that she had passed a year with him; but she was hoping soon to return to her father land.
“They don’t love music. Oh no! And they never have fun—no; their hearts aren’t warm, at least they don’t seem to be to strangers; and they have no relaxation, no way to forget about work and worries—no, not even for a moment. But I don’t think I’ll stay long, because I wouldn’t be able to handle it.” She told me that she had a brother living there as a merchant and that she had spent a year with him; but she was hoping to return to her homeland soon.
I never so strongly felt the truth of the remark, that expression is the soul of beauty, as in looking at, and listening to this young German. She was any thing but handsome; it is true she had large eyes, full of gentle expression, but every feature was irregular; but, oh! the charm of that smile, of that look of deep feeling which animated every feature when she spoke of her own Germany! The tone of her voice, the slight and graceful action which accompanied her words, all struck me as so attractive, that the half hour I passed with her was continually recurring to my memory. I had often taxed myself with feeling something like prejudice against the beautiful American women; but this half hour set my conscience at rest; it is not prejudice which causes one to feel that regularity of features is insufficient to interest, or even to please, beyond the first glance. I certainly believe the women of America to be the handsomest in the world, but as surely do I believe that they are the least attractive.
I never felt more strongly the truth of the saying that expression is the soul of beauty than when I looked at and listened to this young German. She was far from conventionally handsome; it’s true she had large eyes filled with gentle expression, but every feature was irregular. Yet, oh! the charm of that smile, that look of deep feeling that lit up her whole face when she talked about her own Germany! The tone of her voice and the slight, graceful movements that accompanied her words were so captivating that the half hour I spent with her kept coming back to my mind. I often thought I had a bit of bias against beautiful American women, but that half hour put my mind at ease; it’s not prejudice that makes one feel that perfect features are not enough to keep your interest or even to please you beyond the initial glance. I definitely believe American women are the most beautiful in the world, but I also believe they are the least appealing.
We visited the nineteenth annual exhibition of the Pennsylvanian academy of the fine arts; 431 was the number of objects exhibited, which were so arranged as to fill three tolerably large rooms, and one smaller called the director’s room. There were among the number about thirty engravings, and a much larger proportion of water-colour drawings; about seventy had the P.A. (Pensylvanian Academician) annexed to the name of the artist.
We visited the 19th annual exhibition of the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts; there were 431 items on display, arranged to fill three fairly large rooms and one smaller space known as the director’s room. Among them, there were about thirty engravings and a much larger number of watercolor paintings; around seventy had the P.A. (Pennsylvania Academician) designation next to the artist's name.
The principal historical composition was a large scripture piece by Mr. Washington Alston. This gentleman is spoken of as an artist of great merit, and I was told that his manner was much improved since this picture was painted, (it bears date, 1813). I believe it was for this picture Mr. Alston received a prize at the British Gallery.
The main historical piece was a large artwork by Mr. Washington Alston. This guy is described as a highly skilled artist, and I heard that his style has improved a lot since this painting was created (it’s dated 1813). I believe it was for this piece that Mr. Alston won an award at the British Gallery.
There was a portrait of a lady, which, in the catalogue, is designated as “the White Plume,” which had the reputation of being the most admired in the collection, and the artist, Mr. Ingham, is said to rank highest among the portrait-painters of America. This picture is of very high finish, particularly the drapery, which is most elaborately worked, even to the pile of the velvet; the management of the light is much in the manner of Good; but the drawing is very defective, and the contour, though the face is a lovely one, hard and unfleshy. From all the conversations on painting, which I listened to in America, I found that the finish of drapery was considered as the highest excellence, and next to this, the resemblance in a portrait; I do not remember ever to have heard the words drawing or composition used in any conversation on the subject.
There was a portrait of a lady, referred to in the catalog as “the White Plume,” which was known to be the most admired piece in the collection, and the artist, Mr. Ingham, is said to be among the top portrait painters in America. This painting is extremely detailed, especially the drapery, which is intricately crafted, even down to the texture of the velvet; the way the light is handled is reminiscent of Good; however, the drawing is quite poor, and the shape, despite the face being beautiful, appears hard and lacking depth. From all the discussions about painting that I heard in America, I discovered that the detail in drapery was viewed as the highest achievement, followed closely by likeness in a portrait; I don’t recall ever hearing the terms drawing or composition mentioned in any conversation on the topic.
One of the rooms of this academy has inscribed over its door,
One of the rooms in this academy has a sign above its door that reads,
ANTIQUE STATUE GALLERY
Vintage Statue Gallery
The door was open, but just within it was a screen, which prevented any objects in the room being seen from without. Upon my pausing to read this inscription, an old woman who appeared to officiate as guardian of the gallery, hustled up, and addressing me with an air of much mystery, said, “Now, ma’am, now; this is just the time for you—nobody can see you—make haste.”
The door was open, but inside was a screen that blocked anyone outside from seeing into the room. When I stopped to read this sign, an old woman who seemed to be the guardian of the gallery came over and, speaking with a sense of mystery, said, “Now, ma’am, now; this is your moment—no one can see you—hurry up.”
I stared at her with unfeigned surprise, and disengaging my arm, which she had taken apparently to hasten my movements, I very gravely asked her meaning.
I looked at her in genuine surprise, and pulling my arm away from hers, since she seemed to be trying to hurry me up, I seriously asked her what she meant.
“Only, ma’am, that ladies like to go into that room by themselves, when there be no gentlemen watching them.”
“Only, ma’am, that women like to go into that room by themselves when there are no guys watching them.”
On entering this mysterious apartment, the first thing I remarked, was written paper, deprecating the disgusting depravity which had led some of the visitors to mark and deface the casts in a most indecent and shameless manner. This abomination has unquestionably been occasioned by the coarse-minded custom which sends alternate groups of males and females into the room. Were the antique gallery thrown open to mixed parties of ladies and gentlemen, it would soon cease. Till America has reached the degree of refinement which permits of this, the antique casts should not be exhibited to ladies at all. I never felt my delicacy shocked at the Louvre, but I was strangely tempted to resent as an affront the hint I received, that I might steal a glance at what was deemed indecent. Perhaps the arrangements for the exhibition of this room, the feelings which have led to them, and the result they have produced, furnish as good a specimen of the kind of delicacy on which the Americans pride themselves, and of the peculiarities arising from it, as can be found. The room contains about fifty casts, chiefly from the antique.
Upon entering this mysterious apartment, the first thing I noticed was a note criticizing the disgusting behavior that led some visitors to mark and deface the casts in a really indecent and shameless way. This abomination has clearly been caused by the crude practice of sending alternating groups of men and women into the room. If the antique gallery were open to mixed groups of ladies and gentlemen, it would quickly stop. Until America reaches a level of refinement that allows for this, the antique casts shouldn’t be shown to women at all. I never felt my sensibilities offended at the Louvre, but I was oddly tempted to take offense at being suggested that I might steal a glance at what was considered inappropriate. Perhaps the arrangements for the exhibition of this room, the feelings behind them, and the results they produced provide as good an example of the kind of delicacy that Americans take pride in and the peculiarities that come from it as can be found. The room contains about fifty casts, mainly from the antique.
In the director’s room I was amused at the means which a poet had hit upon for advertising his works, or rather HIS WORK, and not less at the elaborate notice of it. His portrait was suspended there, and attached to the frame was a paper inscribed thus:-
In the director’s room, I was entertained by the way a poet had chosen to promote his work, or rather HIS WORK, and also by the detailed notice about it. His portrait was hanging there, and attached to the frame was a piece of paper that read as follows:-
“PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR
of
The Fredoniad, or Independence Preserved, a political,
naval, and military poem, on the late war of 1812,
in forty cantos; the whole compressed in
four volumes; each volume averaging
more than 305 pages,
By RICHARD EMMONS,
M.D.”
“PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR
of
The Fredoniad, or Independence Preserved, a political,
naval, and military poem about the recent war of 1812,
in forty cantos; all condensed into
four volumes; each volume averaging
more than 305 pages,
By RICHARD EMMONS,
M.D.”
I went to the Chesnut Street Theatre to see Mr. Booth, formerly of Drury Lane, in the character of Lear, and a Mrs. Duff in Cordelia; but I have seen too many Lears and Cordelias to be easily pleased; I thought the whole performance very bad. The theatre is of excellently moderate dimensions, and prettily decorated. It was not the fashionable season for the theatres, which I presume must account for the appearance of the company in the boxes, which was any thing but elegant; nor was there more decorum of demeanour than I had observed elsewhere; I saw one man in the lower tier of boxes deliberately take off his coat that he might enjoy the refreshing coolness of shirt sleeves; all the gentlemen wore their hats, and the spitting was unceasing.
I went to the Chestnut Street Theatre to see Mr. Booth, formerly of Drury Lane, playing Lear, and Mrs. Duff as Cordelia; but I've watched too many Lears and Cordelias to be easily impressed, so I thought the whole performance was really bad. The theatre is a nicely sized venue and well-decorated. It wasn’t the popular season for theatres, which I assume explains the appearance of the crowd in the boxes, which was far from elegant, and there was no more decorum than I had seen elsewhere; I noticed one man in the lower tier of boxes deliberately take off his coat so he could enjoy the refreshing coolness of his shirt sleeves; all the gentlemen kept their hats on, and the spitting was nonstop.
On another evening we went to the Walnut Street Theatre; the chief attraction of the night was furnished by the performance of a young man who had been previously exhibited as “a living skeleton.” He played the part of Jeremiah Thin, and certainly looked the part well; and here I think must end my praise of the evening’s performances.
On another evening, we went to the Walnut Street Theatre; the main highlight of the night was a performance by a young man who had previously been showcased as “a living skeleton.” He played the role of Jeremiah Thin, and he definitely looked the part; and I think this is where my compliments for the evening’s performances must stop.
The great and most striking contrast between this city and those of Europe, is perceived after sunset; scarcely a sound is heard; hardly a voice or a wheel breaks the stillness. The Streets are entirely dark, except where a stray lamp marks an hotel or the like; no shops are open, but those of the apothecary, and here and there a cook’s shop; scarcely a step is heard, and for a note of music, or the sound of mirth, I listened in vain. In leaving the theatre, which I always did before the afterpiece, I saw not a single carriage; the night of Miss Wright’s lecture, when I stayed to the end, I saw one. This darkness, this stillness, is so great, that I almost felt it awful. As we walked home one fine moonlight evening from the Chestnut Street house, we stopped a moment before the United States Bank, to look at its white marble columns by the subdued lights said to be so advantageous to them; the building did, indeed, look beautiful; the incongruous objects around were hardly visible, while the brilliant white of the building, which by daylight is dazzling, was mellowed into fainter light and softer shadow.
The biggest and most noticeable difference between this city and those in Europe is clear after sunset; hardly a sound is heard; almost no voices or wheels disrupt the quiet. The streets are completely dark, except where a lonely lamp lights up a hotel or something similar; no shops are open, except for the pharmacy and a few eateries; barely a footstep can be heard, and I listened in vain for music or laughter. When I left the theater, which I always did before the afterpiece, I didn’t see a single carriage; on the night of Miss Wright’s lecture, when I stayed until the end, I saw one. The darkness and stillness are so profound that it almost feels eerie. One pleasant moonlit evening, as we walked home from the Chestnut Street house, we paused for a moment in front of the United States Bank to admire its white marble columns under the soft lights that supposedly highlight them; the building definitely looked beautiful; the mismatched objects around it were barely visible, while the brilliant white of the building, which is blinding in daylight, was softened into a gentler light and shadow.
While pausing before this modern temple of Theseus, we remarked that we alone seemed alive in this great city; it was ten o’clock, and a most lovely cool evening, after a burning day, yet all was silence. Regent Street, Bond Street, with their blaze of gas-light bijouterie, and still more the Italian Boulevard of Paris, rose in strong contrast on the memory; the light, which outshines that of day—the gay, graceful, laughing throng—the elegant saloons of Tortoni, with all their varieties of cooling nectar—were all remembered. Is it an European prejudice to deem that the solitary dram swallowed by the gentlemen on quitting an American theatre indicates a lower and more vicious state of manners, than do the ices so sedulously offered to the ladies on leaving a French one?
While standing in front of this modern temple of Theseus, we noticed that we seemed to be the only ones alive in this vast city; it was ten o’clock on a beautiful, cool evening after a scorching day, yet everything was silent. Regent Street and Bond Street, with their dazzling gas lights and jewelry displays, and even more so the Italian Boulevard in Paris, stood in stark contrast in my memory; the brightness that outshines daylight—the lively, cheerful crowd—the stylish cafés of Tortoni, with all their refreshing drinks—were all recalled. Is it a European bias to think that the solitary drink consumed by men leaving an American theater suggests a lower and more corrupt set of manners than the ice treats so eagerly offered to ladies as they exit a French one?
The museum contains a good collection of objects illustrative of natural history, and some very interesting specimens of Indian antiquities; both here and at Cincinnati I saw so many things resembling Egyptian relics, that I should like to see the origin of the Indian nations enquired into, more accurately than has yet been done.
The museum has a solid collection of items that showcase natural history, along with some fascinating pieces of Indian artifacts. Both here and in Cincinnati, I noticed many items that looked like Egyptian relics, which makes me want to investigate the origins of the Indian nations more thoroughly than has been done so far.
The shops, of which there appeared to me to be an unusually large proportion, are very handsome; many of them in a style of European elegance. Lottery offices abound, and that species of gambling is carried to a great extent. I saw fewer carriages in Philadelphia than either at Baltimore or Washington, but in the winter I was told they were more numerous.
The shops, which I noticed seemed to be unusually plentiful, are very stylish; many of them have a touch of European elegance. There are plenty of lottery offices, and that type of gambling is very popular here. I saw fewer carriages in Philadelphia than in either Baltimore or Washington, but I was told that in the winter they are more common.
Many of the best families had left the city for different watering-places, and others were daily following. Long Branch is a fashionable bathing place on the Jersey shore, to which many resort, both from this place and from New York; the description given of the manner of bathing appeared to me rather extraordinary, but the account was confirmed by so many different people, that I could not doubt its correctness. The shore, it seems, is too bold to admit of bathing machines, and the ladies have, therefore, recourse to another mode of ensuring the enjoyment of a sea-bath with safety. The accommodation at Long Branch is almost entirely at large boarding-houses, where all the company live at a table d’hôte. It is customary for ladies on arriving to look round among the married gentlemen, the first time they meet at table, and to select the one her fancy leads her to prefer as a protector in her purposed visits to the realms of Neptune; she makes her request, which is always graciously received, that he would lead her to taste the briny wave; but another fair one must select the same protector, else the arrangement cannot be complete, as custom does not authorise tete a tete immersion.
Many of the best families had left the city for various vacation spots, and others were following daily. Long Branch is a trendy beach destination on the Jersey shore, attracting many visitors from both this area and New York; the way people described bathing there seemed quite unusual to me, but so many different people confirmed the account that I couldn't doubt its accuracy. It turns out that the shoreline is too steep for bathing machines, so the ladies resort to another way to enjoy a safe sea bath. Most of the accommodations at Long Branch are large boarding houses where everyone shares a table d’hôte. When ladies arrive, it's customary for them to scan the married gentlemen at the table during their first meeting and choose one who catches their interest as a escort for their planned trips into the ocean; she asks him, and he always agrees graciously to take her to experience the salty waves. However, another lady must choose the same escort, or the arrangement isn't complete, as the custom doesn't allow for tete a tete bathing.
CHAPTER XXVI
Quakers—Presbyterians—Itinerant Methodist Preacher—Market—Influence of females in society
Quakers—Presbyterians—Traveling Methodist Preacher—Market—Impact of women in society
I had never chanced, among all my wanderings, to enter a Quaker Meeting-house; and as I thought I could no where make my first visit better than at Philadelphia, I went under the protection of a Quaker lady to the principal orthodox meeting of the city. The building is large, but perfectly without ornament; the men and women are separated by a rail which divides it into two equal parts; the meeting was very full on both sides, and the atmosphere almost intolerably hot. As they glided in at their different doors, I spied many pretty faces peeping from the prim head gear of the females, and as the broad-brimmed males sat down, the welcome Parney supposes prepared for them in heaven, recurred to me,
I had never had the chance, during all my travels, to visit a Quaker Meeting-house; and since I thought my first visit would be best in Philadelphia, I went with a Quaker lady to the main orthodox meeting of the city. The building is large but completely plain; men and women are separated by a rail that divides the space into two equal parts; the meeting was quite crowded on both sides, and the atmosphere was almost unbearably hot. As they came in through their different doors, I noticed many pretty faces peeking out from the modest headgear of the women, and as the broad-brimmed men took their seats, the idea of the warm welcome Parney believes awaits them in heaven came to mind.
“Entre done, et garde ton chapeau.”
“Come in and keep your hat on.”
The little bonnets and the large hats were ranged in long rows, and their stillness was for a long time so unbroken, that I could hardly persuade myself the figures they surmounted were alive. At length a grave square man arose, laid aside his ample beaver, and after another solemn interval of silence, he gave a deep groan, and as it were by the same effort uttered, “Keep thy foot.” Again he was silent for many minutes, and then he continued for more that an hour to put forth one word at a time, but at such an interval from each other that I found it quite impossible to follow his meaning, if, indeed, he had any. My Quaker friend told me she knew not who he was, and that she much regretted I had heard so poor a preacher. After he had concluded, a gentleman-like old man (a physician by profession) arose, and delivered a few moral sentences in an agreeable manner; soon after he had sat down, the whole congregation rose, I know not at what signal, and made their exit. It is a singular kind of worship, if worship it may be called, where all prayer is forbidden; yet it appeared to me, in its decent quietness, infinitely preferable to what I had witnessed at the Presbyterian and Methodist Meeting-houses. A great schism had lately taken place among the Quakers of Philadelphia; many objecting to the over-strict discipline of the orthodox. Among the seceders there are again various shades of difference; I met many who called themselves Unitarian Quakers, others were Hicksites, and others again, though still wearing the Quaker habit, were said to be Deists.
The little bonnets and large hats were lined up in long rows, and for a long time, their stillness was so unbroken that I could hardly convince myself that the figures they topped were alive. Eventually, a serious, square man stood up, took off his large beaver hat, and after another heavy moment of silence, let out a deep groan and announced, “Keep your foot.” He fell silent again for many minutes, and then continued for over an hour, speaking one word at a time, but with such long pauses in between that I found it nearly impossible to follow what he meant, if he even had a point. My Quaker friend told me she didn’t know who he was and regretted that I had to listen to such a poor preacher. After he finished, an old man who seemed quite gentlemanly (a doctor by profession) stood up and shared a few moral thoughts in a pleasant way; shortly after he sat down, the entire congregation stood up, though I’m not sure why, and exited. It’s a unique kind of worship, if it can be called that, where all prayer is forbidden; yet, it seemed to me, in its respectful quietness, far better than what I had experienced at the Presbyterian and Methodist meeting houses. A significant split had recently occurred among the Quakers of Philadelphia; many were unhappy with the overly strict rules of the orthodox. Among those who separated, there were once again various degrees of difference; I met many who identified as Unitarian Quakers, others as Hicksites, and some, still dressed in the Quaker style, were said to be Deists.
We visited many churches and chapels in the city, but none that would elsewhere be called handsome, either internally or externally.
We visited many churches and chapels in the city, but none that would be considered attractive, either inside or outside.
I went one evening, not a Sunday, with a party of ladies to see a Presbyterian minister inducted. The ceremony was woefully long, and the charge to the young man awfully impossible to obey, at least if he were a man, like unto other men. It was matter of astonishment to me to observe the deep attention, and the unwearied patience with which some hundreds of beautiful young girls who were assembled there, (not to mention the old ladies,) listened to the whole of this tedious ceremony; surely there is no country in the world where religion makes so large a part of the amusement and occupation of the ladies. Spain, in its most catholic days, could not exceed it: besides, in spite of the gloomy horrors of the Inquisition, gaiety and amusement were not there offered as a sacrifice by the young and lovely.
I went one evening, not on a Sunday, with a group of ladies to see a Presbyterian minister get inducted. The ceremony was incredibly long, and the expectations for the young man were pretty unrealistic, especially if he was just like any other guy. I was amazed to see the intense focus and endless patience of the hundreds of beautiful young women who were there—along with the older ladies—listening to the entire tedious ceremony. There’s probably no other country in the world where religion plays such a big role in the leisure activities of women. Even Spain in its most Catholic days couldn’t top that. Despite the dark times of the Inquisition, the young and beautiful there weren’t giving up their fun and enjoyment.
The religious severity of Philadelphian manners is in nothing more conspicuous than in the number of chains thrown across the streets on a Sunday to prevent horses and carriages from passing. Surely the Jews could not exceed this country in their external observances. What the gentlemen of Philadelphia do with themselves on a Sunday, I will not pretend to guess, but the prodigious majority of females in the churches is very remarkable. Although a large proportion of the population of this city are Quakers, the same extraordinary variety of faith exists here, as every where else in the Union, and the priests have, in some circles, the same unbounded influence which has been mentioned elsewhere.
The strict religious culture in Philadelphia is most evident in the number of chains put across the streets on Sundays to stop horses and carriages from passing through. Surely, the Jews can't be more rigorous in their external practices than this country. I won’t speculate on how the men of Philadelphia spend their Sundays, but it’s striking to see such a large majority of women in the churches. Even though a significant portion of the city's population are Quakers, there's still a remarkable diversity of beliefs here, just like everywhere else in the country, and in some circles, the priests hold the same considerable influence mentioned before.
One history reached me, which gave a terrible picture of the effect this power may produce; it was related to me by my mantua-maker; a young woman highly estimable as a wife and mother, and on whose veracity I perfectly rely. She told me that her father was a widower, and lived with his family of three daughters, at Philadelphia. A short time before she married, an itinerant preacher came to the city, who contrived to obtain an intimate footing in many respectable families. Her father’s was one of these, and his influence and authority were great with all the sisters, but particularly with the youngest. The young girl’s feelings for him seem to have been a curious mixture of spiritual awe and earthly affection. When she received a hint from her sisters that she ought not to give him too much encouragement till he spoke out, she showed as much holy resentment as if they had told her not to say her prayers too devoutly. At length the father remarked the sort of covert passion that gleamed through the eyes of his godly visitor, and he saw too, the pallid anxious look which had settled on the young brow of his daughter; either this, or some rumours he had heard abroad, or both together, led him to forbid this man his house. The three girls were present when he did so, and all uttered a deprecating “Oh father!” but the old man added stoutly. If you show yourself here again, reverend sir, I will not only teach you the way out of my house, but out of the city also. The preacher withdrew, and was never heard of in Philadelphia afterwards; but when a few months had passed, strange whispers began to creep through the circle which had received and honoured him, and, in due course of time, no less than seven unfortunate girls produced living proofs of the wisdom of my informant’s worthy father. In defence of this dreadful story I can only make the often repeated quotation, “I tell the tale as ’twas told to me;” but, in all sincerity I must add, that I have no doubt of its truth.
One story reached me that painted a horrifying picture of the impact this power can have; it was shared by my dressmaker, a young woman who I hold in high regard as a wife and mother, and I completely trust her honesty. She told me that her father was a widower living in Philadelphia with his three daughters. Not long before her marriage, a traveling preacher came to the city and managed to become closely involved with several respectable families. Her father's family was one of those, and this preacher had significant influence and authority over all the sisters, especially the youngest. The girl seemed to have a strange mix of spiritual admiration and earthly love for him. When her sisters hinted that she shouldn't encourage him too much until he made his intentions clear, she reacted with as much righteous indignation as if they had told her not to pray devoutly. Eventually, the father noticed the kind of hidden passion that flickered in the eyes of this pious visitor, and he also observed the pale, anxious expression on his daughter's face; either this, or some rumors he had heard, or a combination of both, prompted him to forbid this man from entering his home. The three girls were present when he did this, and they all voiced a worried "Oh father!" but the old man responded firmly. "If you show yourself here again, reverend sir, I will not only show you the way out of my house but also out of the city." The preacher left and was never heard from in Philadelphia again; however, after a few months, strange rumors began to circulate among the circle that had once welcomed and respected him, and eventually, no fewer than seven unfortunate girls showed living proof of the wisdom of my informant's respectable father. In defense of this dreadful story, I can only offer the often-repeated line, "I tell the tale as it was told to me;" but, in all honesty, I must add that I have no doubt about its truth.
I was particularly requested to visit the market of Philadelphia, at the hour when it presented the busiest scene; I did so, and thought few cities had any thing to show better worth looking at; it is, indeed, the very perfection of a market, the beau ideal of a notable housewife, who would confide to no deputy the important office of caterer. The neatness, freshness, and entire absence of every thing disagreeable to sight or smell, must be witnessed to be believed. The stalls were spread with snow-white napkins; flowers and fruit, if not quite of Paris or London perfection, yet bright, fresh, and fragrant; with excellent vegetables in the greatest variety and abundance, were all so delightfully exhibited, that objects less pleasing were overlooked and forgotten. The dairy, the poultry-yard, the forest, the river, and the ocean, all contributed their spoil; in short, for the first time in my life, I thought a market a beautiful object. The prices of most articles were, as nearly as I could calculate between dollars and francs, about the same as at Paris; certainly much cheaper than in London, but much dearer than at Exeter.
I was specifically asked to check out the market in Philadelphia during its busiest time; I did, and I thought few cities had anything more worth seeing. It’s truly the perfect market, the ideal place for a housewife who wouldn’t trust anyone else with the important job of catering. The cleanliness, freshness, and complete lack of anything unpleasant to see or smell must be seen to be believed. The stalls were covered with crisp white cloths; flowers and fruit, while not quite at the level of those in Paris or London, were still bright, fresh, and fragrant; and there was a great variety and abundance of excellent vegetables, all displayed so beautifully that less appealing sights were easily overlooked. The dairy, the poultry yard, the forest, the river, and the ocean all contributed their bounty; in short, for the first time in my life, I found a market to be a beautiful sight. The prices of most items were, as far as I could estimate between dollars and francs, about the same as in Paris; definitely cheaper than in London, but much more expensive than in Exeter.
My letters of introduction brought me acquainted with several amiable and interesting people. There is something in the tone of manners at Philadelphia that I liked; it appeared to me that there was less affectation of ton there than elsewhere. There is a quietness, a composure in a Philadelphia drawing-room, that is quite characteristic of a city founded by William Penn. The dress of the ladies, even those who are not Quakers, partakes of this; they are most elegantly neat, and there was a delicacy and good taste in the dress of the young ladies that might serve as a model to the whole Union. There can hardly be a stronger contrast in the style of dress between any two cities than may be remarked between Baltimore and Philadelphia; both are costly, but the former is distinguished by gaudy splendour, the latter by elegant simplicity.
My letters of introduction helped me meet several pleasant and interesting people. I really liked the vibe in Philadelphia; it seemed to have less pretentiousness than other places. There’s a calmness and poise in a Philadelphia living room that reflects its founding by William Penn. The way the women dress, even those who aren’t Quakers, shows this too; they are incredibly stylish and neatly put together, and the young ladies have a delicate and tasteful style that could set a standard for the entire country. The difference in fashion between Baltimore and Philadelphia is striking; both cities are expensive, but Baltimore is known for its flashy extravagance, while Philadelphia stands out for its elegant simplicity.
It is said that this city has many gentlemen distinguished by their scientific pursuits; I conversed with several well informed and intelligent men, but there is a cold dryness of manner and an apparent want of interest in the subjects they discuss, that, to my mind, robs conversation of all its charm. On one occasion I heard the character and situation of an illustrious officer discussed, who had served with renown under Napoleon, and whose high character might have obtained him favour under the Bourbons, could he have abandoned the principles which led him to dislike their government. This distinguished man had retreated to America after the death of his master, and was endeavouring to establish a sort of Polytechnic academy at New York: in speaking of him, I observed, that his devotion to the cause of freedom must prove a strong recommendation in the United States. “Not the least in the world, madam,” answered a gentleman who ranked deservedly high among the literati of the city, “it might avail him much in England, perhaps, but here we are perfectly indifferent as to what people’s principles may be.”
It’s said that this city has many gentlemen known for their scientific pursuits; I talked to several well-informed and intelligent men, but there’s a cold detachment in their manner and a noticeable lack of interest in the topics they discuss that, to me, takes away all the charm of conversation. One time, I heard them discussing the character and situation of a distinguished officer who had served with fame under Napoleon and whose strong character could have won him favor under the Bourbons, if he’d only been willing to abandon the principles that made him oppose their government. This notable man had fled to America after his master’s death and was trying to set up a kind of Polytechnic academy in New York. While discussing him, I pointed out that his commitment to the cause of freedom should be a strong advantage in the United States. “Not in the slightest, ma’am,” replied a gentleman who was rightly respected among the literati of the city, “it might be beneficial for him in England, perhaps, but here we’re completely indifferent to what someone’s principles are.”
This I believe to be exactly true, though I never before heard it avowed as a national feature.
This, I believe, is completely true, even though I’ve never heard it declared as a national characteristic before.
The want of warmth, of interest, of feeling, upon all subjects which do not immediately touch their own concerns, is universal, and has a most paralysing effect upon conversation. All the enthusiasm of America is concentrated to the one point of her own emancipation and independence; on this point nothing can exceed the warmth of her feelings. She may, I think, be compared to a young bride, a sort of Mrs. Major Waddle; her independence is to her as a newly-won bridegroom; for him alone she has eyes, ears, or heart;—the honeymoon is not over yet;—when it is, America will, perhaps, learn more coquetry, and know better how to faire l’aimable to other nations.
The lack of warmth, interest, and empathy for anything that doesn't directly relate to their own issues is widespread, and it really stifles conversation. All of America's enthusiasm is focused solely on her own freedom and independence; on this topic, nothing can match the intensity of her feelings. I think she can be compared to a young bride, a kind of Mrs. Major Waddle; her independence is like a newly-acquired husband to her; she has eyes, ears, and heart only for him;—the honeymoon isn't over yet;—when it is, America will perhaps learn to be more charming and know how to faire l’aimable with other nations.
I conceive that no place in the known world can furnish so striking a proof of the immense value of literary habits as the United States, not only in enlarging the mind, but what is of infinitely more importance, in purifying the manners. During my abode in the country I not only never met a literary man who was a tobacco chewer or a whiskey drinker, but I never met any who were not, that had escaped these degrading habits. On the women, the influence is, if possible, still more important; unfortunately, the instances are rare, but they are to be found. One admirable example occurs in the person of a young lady of Cincinnati: surrounded by a society totally incapable of appreciating, or even of comprehending her, she holds a place among it, as simply and unaffectedly as if of the same species; young, beautiful, and gifted by nature with a mind singularly acute and discriminating, she has happily found such opportunities of cultivation as might distinguish her in any country; it is, indeed, that best of all cultivation which is only to be found in domestic habits of literature, and in that hourly education which the daughter of a man of letters receives when she is made the companion and friend of her father. This young lady is the more admirable as she contrives to unite all the multifarious duties which usually devolve upon American ladies, with her intellectual pursuits. The companion and efficient assistant of her father’s literary labours, the active aid in all the household cares of her mother, the tender nurse of a delicate infant sister, the skilful artificer of her own always elegant wardrobe, ever at leisure, and ever prepared to receive with the sweetest cheerfulness her numerous acquaintance, the most animated in conversation, the most indefatigable in occupation, it was impossible to know her, and study her character without feeling that such women were “the glory of all lands,” and, could the race be multiplied, would speedily become the reformers of all the grossness and ignorance that now degrade her own. Is it to be imagined, that if fifty modifications of this charming young woman were to be met at a party, the men would dare to enter it reeking with whiskey, their lips blackened with tobacco, and convinced, to the very centre of their hearts and souls, that women were made for no other purpose than to fabricate sweetmeats and gingerbread, construct shirts, darn stockings, and become mothers of possible presidents? Assuredly not. Should the women of America ever discover what their power might be, and compare it with what it is, much improvement might be hoped for. While, at Philadelphia, among the handsomest, the wealthiest, and the most distinguished of the land, their comparative influence in society, with that possessed in Europe by females holding the same station, occurred forcibly to my mind.
I believe that no place in the world today demonstrates the immense value of literary habits more than the United States, not just in broadening the mind, but, even more importantly, in improving social behavior. During my time in the country, I never met a literary person who chewed tobacco or drank whiskey, and I didn't encounter any who had escaped these negative habits either. The influence on women is, if anything, even more significant; unfortunately, such instances are rare, but they do exist. One inspiring example is a young woman from Cincinnati: surrounded by a society that can't appreciate or even understand her, she fits in effortlessly as if she's just like them. Young, beautiful, and naturally gifted with a sharp and discerning mind, she has had the chance to develop her skills in a way that would set her apart in any country. It's the best kind of development found in the literary habits at home, and in the daily education she receives as her father's companion and friend. This young woman is particularly remarkable as she manages to balance all the various responsibilities that American women typically have with her intellectual pursuits. She's her father's literary collaborator, actively helps her mother with household tasks, lovingly cares for her delicate infant sister, skillfully creates her own always-elegant wardrobe, and is always ready to greet her many friends with the greatest cheerfulness. The most engaging in conversation and tirelessly busy, knowing her and observing her character makes it clear that women like her are “the glory of all lands,” and if their numbers increased, they would quickly reform all the ignorance and crudeness that currently holds back society. Can we imagine that if fifty versions of this incredible young woman were at a party, men would dare enter reeking of whiskey, their lips stained with tobacco, firmly believing that women exist only to make sweets and pastries, sew shirts, mend stockings, and bear future leaders? Absolutely not. If American women ever realized their potential and compared it with what they currently have, we could expect a lot of progress. While in Philadelphia, among the handsomest, wealthiest, and most distinguished people in the country, I couldn't help but notice the difference in their social influence compared to what women of the same status possess in Europe.
Let me be permitted to describe the day of a Philadelphian lady of the first class, and the inference I would draw from it will be better understood.
Let me describe a day in the life of a high-class lady from Philadelphia, and the point I want to make will be clearer.
It may be said that the most important feature in a woman’s history is her maternity. It is so; but the object of the present observation is the social, and not the domestic influence of woman.
It can be said that the most significant aspect of a woman’s life is her motherhood. That's true, but the focus of this discussion is on the social, rather than the domestic, influence of women.
This lady shall be the wife of a senator and a lawyer in the highest repute and practice. She has a very handsome house, with white marble steps and door-posts, and a delicate silver knocker and door-handle; she has very handsome drawing-rooms, very handsomely furnished, (there is a sideboard in one of them, but it is very handsome, and has very handsome decanters and cut glass water-jugs upon it); she has a very handsome carriage, and a very handsome free black coachman; she is always very handsomely dressed; and, moreover, she is very handsome herself.
This woman will be the wife of a respected senator and a top lawyer. She has a beautiful house with white marble steps and door frames, along with a delicate silver knocker and door handle. Her drawing rooms are elegantly furnished (there’s a sideboard in one of them that is also lovely and holds beautiful decanters and cut glass water jugs); she owns an impressive carriage and has a well-dressed Black coachman. She is always dressed stylishly and, on top of that, she is very attractive herself.
She rises, and her first hour is spent in the scrupulously nice arrangement of her dress; she descends to her parlour neat, stiff, and silent; her breakfast is brought in by her free black footman; she eats her fried ham and her salt fish, and drinks her coffee in silence, while her husband reads one newspaper, and puts another under his elbow; and then, perhaps, she washes the cups and saucers. Her carriage is ordered at eleven; till that hour she is employed in the pastry-room, her snow-white apron protecting her mouse-coloured silk. Twenty minutes before her carriage should appear, she retires to her chamber, as she calls it, shakes, and folds up her still snow-white apron, smooths her rich dress, and with nice care, sets on her elegant bonnet, and all the handsome et cetera; then walks down stairs, just at the moment that her free black coachman announces to her free black footman that the carriage waits. She steps into it, and gives the word, “Drive to the Dorcas society.” her footman stays at home to clean the knives, but her coachman can trust his horses while he opens the carriage door, and his lady not being accustomed to a hand or an arm, gets out very safely without, though one of her own is occupied by a work-basket, and the other by a large roll of all those indescribable matters which ladies take as offerings to Dorcas societies. She enters the parlour appropriated for the meeting, and finds seven other ladies, very like herself, and takes her place among them; she presents her contribution, which is accepted with a gentle circular smile, and her parings of broad cloth, her ends of ribbon, her gilt paper, and her minikin pins, are added to the parings of broad cloth, the ends of ribbon, the gilt papers, and the minikin pins with which the table is already covered; she also produces from her basket three ready-made pincushions, four ink-wipers, seven paper matches, and a paste-board watch-case; these are welcomed with acclamations, and the youngest lady present deposits them carefully on shelves, amid a prodigious quantity of similar articles. She then produces her thimble, and asks for work; it is presented to her, and the eight ladies all stitch together for some hours. Their talk is of priests and of missions; of the profits of their last sale, of their hopes from the next; of the doubt whether your Mr. This, or young Mr. That should receive the fruits of it to fit him out for Liberia; of the very ugly bonnet seen at church on Sabbath morning, of the very handsome preacher who performed on Sabbath afternoon, and of the very large collection made on Sabbath evening. This lasts till three, when the carriage again appears, and the lady and her basket return home; she mounts to her chamber, carefully sets aside her bonnet and its appurtenances, puts on her scolloped black silk apron, walks into the kitchen to see that all is right, then into the parlour, where, having cast a careful glance over the table prepared for dinner, she sits down, work in hand, to await her spouse. He comes, shakes hands with her, spits, and dines. The conversation is not much, and ten minutes suffices for the dinner; fruit and toddy, the newspaper and the work-bag succeed. In the evening the gentleman, being a savant, goes to the Wister society, and afterwards plays a snug rubber at a neighbour’s. The lady receives at tea a young missionary and three members of the Dorcas society.—And so ends her day.
She gets up, and her first hour is spent carefully arranging her dress; she comes down to her living room neat, stiff, and quiet; her breakfast is brought in by her free black footman; she eats her fried ham and salt fish, sipping her coffee in silence while her husband reads one newspaper and keeps another under his arm; then, perhaps, she washes the cups and saucers. Her carriage is scheduled for eleven; until then, she works in the pastry kitchen, her snow-white apron protecting her gray silk dress. Twenty minutes before the carriage is due, she retreats to her room, shakes off, and folds her still snow-white apron, smooths her fancy dress, and, with careful precision, puts on her elegant bonnet and all the nice accessories; then she walks downstairs just as her free black coachman announces to her free black footman that the carriage is ready. She gets in and says, “Drive to the Dorcas society.” Her footman stays home to clean the knives, but her coachman trusts his horses as he opens the carriage door, and since she isn’t used to needing a hand or an arm, she steps out safely despite holding a work basket in one hand and a large roll of various supplies for the Dorcas society in the other. She enters the designated meeting room and finds seven other ladies who are much like her, and takes her place among them; she presents her contributions, which are accepted with a gentle, friendly smile, and her scraps of broad cloth, ribbon ends, gilt paper, and tiny pins are added to the growing collection on the table. She also brings out three ready-made pincushions, four ink-wipers, seven paper matches, and a cardboard watch case; these are welcomed with cheers, and the youngest lady there carefully places them on shelves stacked with similar items. She then takes out her thimble and asks for work; it is handed to her, and all eight ladies sew together for several hours. Their conversation is about priests and missions; the profits from their last sale and their hopes for the next; whether Mr. This or young Mr. That should benefit from it to prepare for Liberia; the very ugly bonnet seen at church on Sunday morning, the very handsome preacher from Sunday afternoon, and the substantial collection made on Sunday evening. This goes on until three when the carriage arrives again, and the lady and her basket head home; she goes up to her room, carefully puts away her bonnet and its accessories, puts on her scalloped black silk apron, and walks into the kitchen to check that everything is in order, then into the living room where, after a careful look at the dinner table, she sits down, work in hand, to wait for her husband. He arrives, shakes her hand, spits, and eats dinner. There isn’t much conversation, and ten minutes is enough for dinner; after that come fruit and toddy, the newspaper, and her work bag. In the evening, the gentleman, being a scholar, goes to the Wister society and then plays a friendly game at a neighbor’s. The lady hosts a young missionary and three members of the Dorcas society for tea.—And so her day ends.
For some reason or other, which English people are not very likely to understand, a great number of young married persons board by the year, instead of “going to housekeeping,” as they call having an establishment of their own. Of course this statement does not include persons of large fortune, but it does include very many whose rank in society would make such a mode of life quite impossible with us. I can hardly imagine a contrivance more effectual for ensuring the insignificance of a woman, than marrying her at seventeen, and placing her in a boarding-house. Nor can I easily imagine a life of more uniform dulness for the lady herself; but this certainly is a matter of taste. I have heard many ladies declare that it is “just quite the perfection of comfort to have nothing to fix for oneself.” Yet despite these assurances I always experienced a feeling which hovered between pity and contempt, when I contemplated their mode of existence.
For some reason that English people probably won’t understand, a lot of young married couples choose to board for the year instead of “going to housekeeping,” which is what they call setting up their own home. Of course, this doesn’t apply to wealthy individuals, but it includes many people whose social status would make such a lifestyle impossible for us. I can hardly think of a more effective way to ensure a woman’s insignificance than marrying her at seventeen and placing her in a boarding house. I also can’t easily picture a more monotonous life for the lady herself, but that’s definitely a matter of personal preference. I’ve heard many women say that it’s “just perfect comfort to have nothing to manage for oneself.” Yet despite these claims, I always felt a mix of pity and contempt when I thought about their way of life.
How would a newly-married Englishwoman endure it, her head and her heart full of the one dear scheme—
How would a newly-married Englishwoman handle it, her mind and her heart filled with the one beloved plan—
“Well-ordered home, his dear delight to make?”
“Neatly organized home, his greatest joy to create?”
She must rise exactly in time to reach the boarding table at the hour appointed for breakfast, or she will get a stiff bow from the lady president, cold coffee, and no egg. I have been sometimes greatly amused upon these occasions by watching a little scene in which the bye-play had much more meaning than the words uttered. The fasting, but tardy lady, looks round the table, and having ascertained that there was no egg left, says distinctly, “I will take an egg if you please.” But as this is addressed to no one in particular, no one in particular answers it, unless it happen that her husband is at table before her, and then he says, “There are no eggs, my dear.” Whereupon the lady president evidently cannot hear, and the greedy culprit who has swallowed two eggs (for there are always as many eggs as noses) looks pretty considerably afraid of being found out. The breakfast proceeds in sombre silence, save that sometimes a parrot, and sometimes a canary bird, ventures to utter a timid note. When it is finished, the gentlemen hurry to their occupation, and the quiet ladies mount the stairs, some to the first, some to the second, and some to the third stories, in an inverse proportion to the number of dollars paid, and ensconce themselves in their respective chambers. As to what they do there it is not very easy to say, but I believe they clear-starch a little, and iron a little, and sit in a rocking-chair, and sew a great deal. I always observed that the ladies who boarded, wore more elaborately worked collars and petticoats than any one else. The plough is hardly a more blessed instrument in America than the needle. How could they live without it? But time and the needle wear through the longest morning, and happily the American morning is not very long, even though they breakfast at eight.
She has to get up right on time to make it to the breakfast table when it's scheduled, or she'll be met with a stiff bow from the lady president, cold coffee, and no egg. I’ve often found it amusing to watch a little scene unfold where the unspoken actions hold more significance than the words spoken. The hungry but late lady looks around the table, sees there are no eggs left, and clearly states, “I would like an egg, please.” But since she isn’t addressing anyone in particular, no one responds to her request, unless her husband is seated there first, in which case he says, “There are no eggs, my dear.” At this point, the lady president clearly doesn’t hear, and the greedy culprit who just ate two eggs (because there are always as many eggs as there are people) looks quite worried about being caught. The breakfast goes on in heavy silence, occasionally broken by a parrot or a canary tenderly chirping. Once it wraps up, the men rush off to their work, while the quiet ladies head upstairs—some to the first floor, some to the second, and some to the third—each according to how much they paid, and settle into their rooms. What they do there isn’t entirely clear, but I believe they starch and iron a bit, rock in a chair, and do a lot of sewing. I’ve always noticed that the boarding ladies wore more elaborately designed collars and petticoats than anyone else. The needle is hardly less essential in America than the plow. How could they survive without it? But time and the needle wear through even the longest morning, and fortunately, the American morning isn't very lengthy, even if they eat breakfast at eight.
It is generally about two o’clock that the boarding gentlemen meet the boarding ladies at dinner. Little is spoken, except a whisper between the married pairs. Sometimes a sulky bottle of wine flanks the plate of one or two individuals, but it adds nothing to the mirth of the meeting, and seldom more than one glass to the good cheer of the owners, it is not then, and it is not there, that the gentlemen of the Union drink. Soon, very soon, the silent meal is done, and then, if you mount the stairs after them, you will find from the doors of the more affectionate and indulgent wives, a smell of cigars steam forth, which plainly indicates the felicity of the couple within. If the gentleman be a very polite husband, he will, as soon as he has done smoking and drinking his toddy, offer his arm to his wife, as far as the corner of the street, where his store, or his office is situated, and there he will leave her to turn which way she likes. As this is the hour for being full dressed, of course she turns the way she can be most seen. Perhaps she pays a few visits; perhaps she goes to chapel; or, perhaps, she enters some store where her husband deals, and ventures to order a few notions; and then she goes home again—no, not home—I will not give that name to a boarding-house—but she re-enters the cold heartless atmosphere in which she dwells, where hospitality can never enter, and where interest takes the management instead of affection. At tea they all meet again, and a little trickery is perceptible to a nice observer in the manner of partaking the pound-cake, &c. After this, those who are happy enough to have engagements hasten to keep them; those who have not, either mount again to the solitude of their chamber, or, what appeared to me much worse, remain in the common sitting-room, in a society cemented by no tie, endeared by no connexion, which choice did not bring together, and which the slightest motive would break asunder. I remarked that the gentlemen were generally obliged to go out every evening on business, and, I confess, the arrangement did not surprise me.
It’s usually around two o’clock when the boarding gentlemen meet the boarding ladies for dinner. There’s not much conversation, except for whispers among the married couples. Sometimes a sulky bottle of wine sits beside the plate of one or two people, but it doesn’t add to the fun of the gathering and hardly contributes more than one glass to the good cheer of the owners. This isn’t the time or place for the gentlemen of the Union to drink. Before long, the quiet meal is over, and if you head upstairs after them, you’ll notice a smell of cigars wafting from the doors of the more affectionate and indulgent wives, clearly indicating the happiness of the couple inside. If the gentleman is a particularly polite husband, once he finishes smoking and enjoying his drink, he’ll offer his arm to his wife as far as the corner of the street, where his store or office is located, and there he’ll leave her to go wherever she likes. Since this is the time to be dressed up, she’ll naturally head in a direction where she can be seen the most. Maybe she makes a few visits; maybe she goes to church; or perhaps she steps into a store where her husband does business, and tries to pick up a few things; then she heads back—no, not back home—I won’t call it that—a boarding house isn’t a home—but she re-enters the cold, unwelcoming atmosphere where she lives, where hospitality can never come in, and self-interest runs the show instead of affection. They all come together again for tea, and a little trickiness can be noticed by an observant eye in how they share the pound cake, etc. After that, those fortunate enough to have plans rush off to keep them; those who don’t either return to the solitude of their room, or, what seemed much worse to me, stay in the common sitting room, in a company bound by no ties, endeared by no connections, randomly assembled, and which could easily fall apart over the smallest issue. I noticed that the gentlemen usually had to head out every evening for work, and I must admit, I wasn't surprised by this arrangement.
It is not thus that the women can obtain that influence in society which is allowed to them in Europe, and to which, both sages and men of the world have agreed in ascribing such salutary effects. It is in vain that “collegiate institutes” are formed for young ladies, or that “academic degrees” are conferred upon them. It is after marriage, and when these young attempts upon all the sciences are forgotten, that the lamentable insignificance of the American woman appears, and till this be remedied, I venture to prophesy that the tone of their drawing-rooms will not improve.
It’s not like women can gain the same influence in society here that they do in Europe, which both wise people and worldly individuals agree has such positive effects. It doesn’t matter if “collegiate institutes” are created for young women or if they receive “academic degrees.” It’s after marriage, once these young efforts in various fields are forgotten, that the unfortunate lack of significance of American women becomes evident, and until this changes, I dare say that the atmosphere of their living rooms won’t get any better.
Whilst I was at Philadelphia a great deal of attention was excited by the situation of two criminals, who had been convicted of robbing the Baltimore mail, and were lying under sentence of death. The rare occurrence of capital punishment in America makes it always an event of great interest; and the approaching execution was repeatedly the subject of conversation at the boarding table. One day a gentleman told us he had that morning been assured that one of the criminals had declared to the visiting clergyman that he was certain of being reprieved, and that nothing the clergyman could say to the contrary made any impression upon him. Day after day this same story was repeated, and commented upon at table, and it appeared that the report had been heard in so many quarters, that not only was the statement received as true, but it began to be conjectured that the criminal had some ground for his hope. I learnt from these daily conversations that one of the prisoners was an American, and the other an Irishman, and it was the former who was so strongly persuaded he should not be hanged. Several of the gentlemen at table, in canvassing the subject, declared, that if the one were hanged and the other spared, this hanging would be a murder, and not a legal execution. In discussing this point, it was stated that very nearly all the white men who had suffered death since the declaration of Independence had been Irishmen. What truth there may be in this general statement, I have no means of ascertaining; all I know is, that I heard it made. On this occasion, however, the Irishman was hanged, and the American was not.
While I was in Philadelphia, a lot of attention was focused on two criminals who had been found guilty of robbing the Baltimore mail and were facing the death penalty. The rare instance of capital punishment in America always draws significant interest, and the upcoming execution was frequently discussed at the boarding table. One day, a gentleman told us he had been informed that morning that one of the criminals had told the visiting clergyman he was sure he would be reprieved, and that nothing the clergyman said could change his mind. Day after day, this same story was shared and discussed at the table, and it seemed the report had been so widely circulated that not only was it believed to be true, but it started to be speculated that the criminal had some reason to feel hopeful. From these daily conversations, I learned that one of the prisoners was American, and the other was Irish, with the American firmly convinced he wouldn’t be hanged. Several gentlemen at the table, while debating the issue, claimed that if one was hanged and the other spared, the hanging would be a murder and not a legal execution. During this discussion, it was pointed out that almost all the white men who had been executed since the Declaration of Independence were Irishmen. I have no way of verifying the truth of this general statement; all I know is that I heard it mentioned. In this instance, however, the Irishman was hanged, and the American was not.
CHAPTER XXVII
Return to Stonington—Thunderstorm—Emigrants—Illness—Alexandria
Return to Stonington—Thunderstorm—Immigrants—Illness—Alexandria
A fortnight passed rapidly away in this great city, and, doubtless, there was still much left unseen when we quitted it, according to previous arrangement, to return to our friends in Maryland. We came back by a different route, going by land from Newcastle to French Town, instead of passing by the canal. We reached Baltimore in the middle of the night, but finished our repose on board the steam-boat, and started for Washington at five o’clock the next morning.
A couple of weeks flew by in this big city, and there was probably still a lot we didn't get to see when we left, as planned, to go back to our friends in Maryland. We took a different route back, traveling by land from Newcastle to French Town instead of taking the canal. We arrived in Baltimore in the middle of the night, but we rested on the steamboat and left for Washington at five o'clock the next morning.
Our short abode amid the heat and closeness of a city made us enjoy more than ever the beautiful scenery around Stonington. The autumn, which soon advanced upon us, again clothed the woods in colours too varied and gaudy to be conceived by those who have never quitted Europe; and the stately maize, waving its flowing tassels, as the long drooping blossoms are called, made every field look like a little forest. A rainy spring had been followed by a summer of unusual heat; and towards the autumn frequent thunderstorms of terrific violence cleared the air, but at the same time frightened us almost out of our wits. On one occasion I was exposed, with my children, to the full fury of one of these awful visitations. We suffered considerable terror during this storm, but when we were all again safe, and comfortably sheltered, we rejoiced that the accident had occurred, as it gave us the best possible opportunity of witnessing, in all its glory, a transatlantic thunderstorm. It was, however, great imprudence that exposed us to it, for we quitted the house, and mounted a hill at a considerable distance from it, for the express purpose of watching to advantage the extraordinary aspect of the clouds. When we reached the top of the hill half the heavens appeared hung with a heavy curtain; a sort of deep blue black seemed to colour the very air; the blizzards screamed, as with heavy wing they sought the earth. We ought, in common prudence, to have immediately retreated to the house, but the scene was too beautiful to be left. For several minutes after we reached our station, the air appeared perfectly without movement, no flash broke through the seven-fold cloud, but a flickering light was visible, darting to and fro behind it. By degrees the thunder rolled onward, nearer and nearer, till the inky cloud burst asunder, and cataracts of light came pouring from behind it. From that moment there was no interval, no pause, the lightning did not flash, there were no claps of thunder, but the heavens blazed and bellowed above and around us, till stupor took the place of terror, and we stood utterly confounded. But we were speedily aroused, for suddenly, as if from beneath our feet, a gust arose which threatened to mix all the elements in one. Torrents of water seemed to bruise the earth by their violence; eddies of thick dust rose up to meet them; the fierce fires of heaven only blazed the brighter for the falling flood; while the blast almost out-roared the thunder. But the wind was left at last the lord of all, for after striking with wild force, now here, now there, and bringing worlds of clouds together in most hostile contact, it finished by clearing the wide heavens of all but a few soft straggling masses, whence sprung a glorious rainbow, and then retired, leaving the earth to raise her half crushed forests; and we, poor pigmies, to call back our frighted senses, and recover breath as we might.
Our short stay in the heat and hustle of the city made us appreciate the beautiful scenery around Stonington more than ever. Autumn soon arrived, dressing the woods in colors so bright and varied that they could hardly be imagined by anyone who has never left Europe. The tall corn, with its flowing tassels—what we call the long drooping blossoms—made every field look like a little forest. A rainy spring had been followed by an unusually hot summer, and as autumn approached, we experienced frequent thunderstorms that were terrifying but cleared the air. One time, I was caught with my children in the full force of one of these storms. We were quite scared during it, but once we were safe and comfortably sheltered, we were glad the experience had happened because it gave us the chance to witness a transatlantic thunderstorm in all its glory. However, it was pretty reckless of us to put ourselves in that situation; we left the house and climbed a hill some distance away to get a better view of the extraordinary clouds. When we reached the top, half the sky looked like it was covered by a heavy curtain; a deep blue-black hue colored the very air; the winds howled as if they were desperately trying to reach the ground. We should have prudently returned to the house, but the scene was too beautiful to leave. For several minutes after we arrived, the air was completely still. No lightning pierced the thick clouds, but a flickering light was visible, darting around behind them. Gradually, the thunder began rolling closer and closer until the dark clouds split open, and torrents of light poured from behind them. From that point, there were no breaks, no pauses; instead of flashing, the lightning illuminated everything, and the thunder rumbled overhead until the shock turned to a sort of daze, leaving us utterly astonished. But we were quickly jolted back to reality when a gust of wind suddenly swept up from beneath us, threatening to merge all the elements. Sheets of rain seemed to smash into the earth; whirls of thick dust rose to meet them; the fierce lightning blazed even brighter against the downpour; while the wind almost drowned out the sound of the thunder. In the end, the wind became the ruler of everything, striking wildly, gathering clouds in fierce collisions, and finally clearing the vast sky of all but a few soft, scattered remnants, from which a glorious rainbow emerged. Then it left, allowing the earth to lift its battered forests, and we, tiny beings, tried to regain our startled senses and catch our breath as best we could.
During this gust, it would have been impossible for us to have kept our feet; we crouched down under the shelter of a heap of stones, and, as we informed each other, looked most dismally pale.
During this gust, it would have been impossible for us to keep our footing; we crouched down under the cover of a pile of stones, and as we informed each other, looked extremely pale.
Many trees were brought to the earth before our eyes; some torn up by the roots, and some mighty stems snapt off several feet from the ground. If the West Indian hurricanes exceed this, they must be terrible indeed.
Many trees were brought down to the ground right in front of us; some were uprooted, and others were powerful trunks snapped off several feet above the ground. If the West Indian hurricanes are worse than this, they must be truly terrifying.
The situation of Mrs. S—’s house was considered as remarkably healthy, and I believe justly so, for on more than one occasion, persons who were suffering from fever and ague at the distance of a mile or two, were perfectly restored by passing a week or fortnight at Stonington; but the neighbourhood of it, particularly on the side bordering the Potomac, was much otherwise, and the mortality among the labourers on the canal was frightful.
The condition of Mrs. S—'s house was seen as exceptionally healthy, and I think rightly so, because several people suffering from fever and chills just a mile or two away were completely cured after spending a week or two in Stonington. However, the area surrounding it, especially on the side near the Potomac, was quite different, and the death rate among the workers on the canal was alarming.
I have elsewhere stated my doubts if the labouring poor of our country mend their condition by emigrating to the United States, but it was not till the opportunity which a vicinity to the Chesapeake and Ohio canal gave me, of knowing what their situation was after making the change, that I became fully aware how little it was to be desired for them.
I have previously expressed my doubts about whether the working poor in our country improve their situation by moving to the United States, but it wasn't until I had the chance to learn about their circumstances after making the move, thanks to being near the Chesapeake and Ohio canal, that I truly realized how undesirable their situation was.
Of the white labourers on this canal, the great majority are Irishmen; their wages are from ten to fifteen dollars a month, with a miserable lodging, and a large allowance of whiskey. It is by means of this hateful poison that they are tempted, and indeed enabled for a time, to stand the broiling heat of the sun in a most noxious climate: for through such, close to the romantic but unwholesome Potomac, the line of the canal has hitherto run. The situation of these poor strangers, when they sink at last in “the fever,” which sooner or later is sure to overtake them, is dreadful. There is a strong feeling against the Irish in every part of the Union, but they will do twice as much work as a negro, and therefore they are employed. When they fall sick, they may, and must, look with envy on the slaves around them; for they are cared for; they are watched and physicked, as a valuable horse is watched and physicked: not so the Irishman, he is literally thrown on one side, and a new comer takes his place. Details of their sufferings, and unheeded death, too painful to dwell upon, often reached us; on one occasion a farmer calling at the house, told the family that a poor man, apparently in a dying condition, was lying beside a little brook at the distance of a quarter of a mile. The spot was immediately visited by some of the family, and there in truth lay a poor creature, who was already past the power of speaking; he was conveyed to the house and expired during the night. By enquiring at the canal, it was found that he was an Irish labourer, who having fallen sick, and spent his last cent, had left the stifling shanty where he lay, in the desperate attempt of finding his way to Washington, with what hope I know not. He did not appear above twenty, and as I looked on his pale young face, which even in death expressed suffering, I thought that perhaps he had left a mother and a home to seek wealth in America. I saw him buried under a group of locust trees, his very name unknown to those who laid him there, but the attendance of the whole family at the grave, gave a sort of decency to his funeral which rarely, in that country, honors the poor relics of British dust: but no clergyman attended, no prayer was said, no bell was tolled; these, indeed, are ceremonies unthought of, and in fact unattainable without much expense, at such a distance from a town; had the poor youth been an American, he would have been laid in the earth in the same unceremonious manner. But had this poor Irish lad fallen sick in equal poverty and destitution among his own people, he would have found a blanket to wrap his shivering limbs, and a kindred hand to close his eyes.
The white laborers on this canal are mostly Irishmen; they earn between ten and fifteen dollars a month, with terrible living conditions and a hefty supply of whiskey. It's through this awful substance that they are lured and, at least temporarily, able to bear the scorching sun in a toxic environment: the canal runs close to the scenic yet unhealthy Potomac. The plight of these unfortunate strangers when they eventually succumb to "the fever," which is bound to catch up with them, is horrifying. There's a strong bias against the Irish across the country, but they work twice as hard as Black laborers, which is why they are hired. When they get sick, they can only watch with envy as the enslaved people around them receive care; they are monitored and treated like valuable animals. In contrast, the Irishman is simply discarded, replaced by someone new. We often heard painful details about their suffering and neglected deaths; once, a farmer visiting our home told us that a poor man, apparently dying, was lying by a small brook a quarter of a mile away. Some family members went to check, and indeed found a poor soul who could barely speak; he was brought home but passed away during the night. By asking around at the canal, we learned he was an Irish laborer who, after falling ill and spending his last penny, had left the suffocating shack where he lay in a desperate attempt to find his way to Washington, for reasons unknown. He looked no older than twenty, and as I saw his pale young face, which even in death showed signs of suffering, I thought he might have left behind a mother and a home to seek fortune in America. He was buried under a cluster of locust trees, his name unknown to those who laid him to rest, but the entire family attended his grave, lending a semblance of dignity to his funeral, which is often lacking for the remains of poor souls in that country. However, no clergyman came, no prayers were offered, and no bells were rung; these rites are rarely considered and practically impossible to arrange without significant expense so far from town. Had this young man been American, he would have been buried just as casually. But if this poor Irish lad had fallen ill in equal poverty among his own people, he would have had a blanket to keep him warm and a caring hand to close his eyes.
The poor of great Britain, whom distress, or a spirit of enterprise tempt to try another land, ought, for many reasons, to repair to Canada; there they would meet co-operation and sympathy, instead of malice, hatred, and all uncharitableness.
The poor of Great Britain, who are tempted by hardship or the desire for adventure to try out a new country, should, for many reasons, head to Canada; there they would find support and kindness, instead of malice, hatred, and all forms of uncharitableness.
I frequently heard vehement complaints, and constantly met the same in the newspapers, of a practice stated to be very generally adopted in Britain of sending out cargoes of parish paupers to the United States. A Baltimore paper heads some such remarks with the words
I often heard strong complaints and frequently saw the same in the newspapers about a practice that's reportedly very common in Britain: sending cargoes of parish poor people to the United States. A newspaper from Baltimore introduces some of these comments with the words
“INFAMOUS CONDUCT!”
“NOTORIOUS BEHAVIOR!”
and then tells us of a cargo of aged paupers just arrived from England, adding, “John Bull has squeezed the orange, and now insolently casts the skin in our faces.” Such being the feeling, it will be readily believed that these unfortunates are not likely to meet much kindness or sympathy in sickness, or in suffering of any kind. If these American statements be correct, and that different parishes are induced, from an excessive population, to pay the voyage and outfit of some of their paupers across the Atlantic, why not send them to Canada?
and then tells us about a group of elderly beggars who just arrived from England, adding, “John Bull has squeezed the orange, and now arrogantly throws the peel in our faces.” Given this attitude, it’s easy to see why these unfortunate people aren't expected to receive much kindness or compassion when they're ill or suffering in any way. If these American claims are true, and different parishes are compelled, due to overpopulation, to cover the travel costs and expenses for some of their beggars across the Atlantic, why not send them to Canada?
It is certain, however, that all the enquiries I could make failed to substantiate these American statements. All I could ascertain was, that many English and Irish poor arrived yearly in the United States, with no other resources than what their labour furnished. This, though very different from the newspaper stories, is quite enough to direct attention to the subject. It is generally acknowledged that the suffering among our labouring classes arises from the excess of our population; and it is impossible to see such a country as Canada, its extent, its fertility, its fine climate, and know that it is British ground, without feeling equal sorrow and astonishment that it is not made the means of relief. How earnestly it is to be wished that some part of that excellent feeling which is for ever at work in England to help the distressed, could be directed systematically to the object of emigration to the Canadas. Large sums are annually raised for charitable purposes, by weekly subscriptions of one penny; were only a part of the money so obtained to be devoted to this object, hundreds of families might yearly be sent to people our own land. The religious feeling, which so naturally mixes with every charitable purpose, would there find the best field for its exertions. Where could a missionary, whether Protestant or Catholic, find a holier mission than that which sent him to comfort and instruct his countrymen in the wilderness? or where could he reap a higher reward in this world, than seeing that wilderness growing into fertile fields under the hands of his flock?
It’s clear, however, that all the inquiries I made couldn’t prove these American claims. All I could find out was that many poor people from England and Ireland arrive in the United States every year, with nothing but their labor to rely on. This, while very different from the stories in the newspapers, is enough to draw attention to the issue. It’s widely recognized that the hardships among our working-class arise from overpopulation; and it’s hard to look at a country like Canada—with its size, richness, and nice climate—and not feel both sorrow and surprise that it isn’t being used as a means of relief. How much we wish that some of that strong desire to help those in need in England could be systematically directed toward supporting emigration to Canada. Large amounts of money are raised every year for charitable causes, often through weekly contributions of a penny; if only some of that money were used for this purpose, hundreds of families could be helped to settle in our land each year. The religious spirit that naturally accompanies charity would find a wonderful outlet there. Where could a missionary, whether Protestant or Catholic, find a more noble mission than to comfort and educate his fellow countrymen in the wilderness? And where could he find a greater reward in this life than witnessing that wilderness transformed into fertile fields by the efforts of his community?
I never saw so many autumn flowers as grow in the woods and sheep-walks of Maryland; a second spring seemed to clothe the fields, but with grief and shame I confess, that of these precious blossoms I scarcely knew a single name. I think the Michaelmas daisy, in wonderful variety of form and colour, and the prickly pear, were almost my only acquaintance: let no one visit America without having first studied botany; it is an amusement, as a clever friend of mine once told me, that helps one wonderfully up and down hill, and must be superlatively valuable in America, both from the plentiful lack of other amusements, and the plentiful material for enjoyment in this; besides, if one is dying to know the name of any of these lovely strangers, it is a thousand to one against his finding any one who can tell it.
I’ve never seen so many autumn flowers growing in the woods and pastures of Maryland; it was like a second spring covering the fields. But, with regret and embarrassment, I admit that I hardly knew the name of a single one of these beautiful blossoms. I think the Michaelmas daisy, with its stunning variety of shapes and colors, and the prickly pear were almost my only friends. Let no one visit America without studying botany first; as a clever friend of mine once said, it’s a pastime that really helps you when hiking up and down hills, and it must be incredibly valuable in America, both because there aren’t many other activities and because there’s so much here to enjoy. Plus, if you’re eager to know the name of any of these lovely plants, the chances are slim that you’ll find anyone who can tell you.
The prettiest eclipse of the moon I ever saw was that of September, of this year, (1830). We had been passing some hours amid the solemn scenery of the Potomac falls, and just as we were preparing to quit it, the full moon arose above the black pines, with half our shadow thrown across her. The effect of her rising thus eclipsed was more strange, more striking by far, than watching the gradual obscuration; and as I turned to look at the black chasm behind me, and saw the deadly alder, and the poison-vine waving darkly on the rocks around, I thought the scene wanted nothing but the figure of a palsied crone, plucking the fatal branches to concoct some charm of mischief.
The most beautiful lunar eclipse I’ve ever seen was in September of this year (1830). We had spent several hours taking in the solemn landscape of the Potomac Falls, and just as we were getting ready to leave, the full moon rose above the dark pines, casting half of our shadow across her. The sight of her rising eclipse was much stranger and far more striking than watching the gradual shadowing; as I turned to gaze at the dark chasm behind me and saw the deadly alder and the poison vine swaying ominously on the rocks around, I thought the scene needed nothing but the figure of an old witch, gathering the dangerous branches to brew some kind of curse.
Whether some such maga dogged my steps, I know not, but many hours had not elapsed ere I again felt the noxious influence of an American autumn. This fever, “built in th’ eclipse,” speedily brought me very low, and though it lasted not so long as that of the preceding year, I felt persuaded I should never recover from it. Though my forebodings were not verified by the event, it was declared that change of air was necessary, and it was arranged for me, (for I was perfectly incapable of settling any thing for myself,) that I should go to Alexandria, a pretty town at the distance of about fifteen miles, which had the reputation of possessing a skilful physician.
Whether some kind of illness was following me, I’m not sure, but it wasn’t long before I felt the negative effects of an American autumn again. This fever, "born in the eclipse," quickly brought me down, and even though it didn’t last as long as the one from the previous year, I was convinced I would never get over it. Even though my worries didn’t turn out to be true, it was said that I needed a change of air, and it was arranged for me (since I was completely incapable of making any decisions for myself) to go to Alexandria, a nice town about fifteen miles away, which was known for having a skilled doctor.
It was not without regret that we quitted our friends at Stonington; but the prescription proved in a great degree efficacious; a few weeks’ residence in Alexandria restored my strength sufficiently to enable me to walk to a beautiful little grassy terrace, perfectly out of the town, but very near it, from whence we could watch the various craft that peopled the Potomac between Alexandria and Washington. But though gradually regaining strength, I was still far from well; all plans for winter gaiety were abandoned, and finding ourselves very well accommodated, we decided upon passing the winter where we were. It proved unusually severe; the Potomac was so completely frozen as to permit considerable traffic to be carried on by carts, crossing on the ice, from Maryland. This had not occurred before for thirty years. The distance was a mile and a quarter, and we ventured to brave the cold, and walk across this bright and slippery mirror, to make a visit on the opposite shore; the fatigue of keeping our feet was by no means inconsiderable, but we were rewarded by seeing as noble a winter landscape around us as the eye could look upon.
It was with some regret that we left our friends in Stonington; however, the treatment worked quite well. A few weeks in Alexandria helped me regain enough strength to walk to a beautiful grassy terrace just outside the town, but close enough to it, where we could watch the various boats on the Potomac between Alexandria and Washington. Even though I was slowly getting better, I still wasn’t well; all plans for winter fun were dropped, and since we were comfortable where we were, we decided to spend the winter there. It turned out to be unusually harsh; the Potomac froze solid enough for carts to cross on the ice from Maryland. This hadn’t happened in thirty years. The distance was a mile and a quarter, and we braved the cold to walk across this bright and slippery surface to visit the opposite shore. The effort of staying upright was significant, but we were rewarded with a stunning winter landscape all around us.
When at length the frost gave way, the melting snow produced freshes so violent as to carry away the long bridge at Washington; large fragments of it, with the railing still erect, came floating down amidst vast blocks of ice, during many successive days, and it was curious to see the intrepidity with which the young sailors of Alexandria periled their lives to make spoil of the timber.
When the frost finally melted, the thawing snow caused such strong currents that they swept away the long bridge at Washington. Large pieces of it, with the railings still intact, floated down among massive blocks of ice for several days. It was fascinating to see how brave the young sailors from Alexandria were as they risked their lives to collect the timber.
The solar eclipse of the 12th of February, 1831, was nearer total than any I ever saw, or ever shall see. It was completely annular at Alexandria, and the bright ring which surrounded the moon’s shadow, though only 81° in breadth, gave light sufficient to read the smallest print; the darkness was considerably lessened by the snow, which, as the day was perfectly unclouded, reflected brightly all the light that was left us.
The solar eclipse on February 12, 1831, was closer to total than any I have ever seen or will ever see. It was totally annular in Alexandria, and the bright ring around the moon's shadow, though only 81° wide, was bright enough to read the smallest print; the darkness was significantly reduced by the snow, which, since the day was completely clear, reflected all the remaining light brightly.
Notwithstanding the extreme cold, we passed the whole time in the open air, on a rising ground near the river; in this position many beautiful effects were perceptible; the rapid approach and change of shadows, the dusky hue of the broad Potomac, that seemed to drink in the feeble light, which its snow-covered banks gave back to the air, the gradual change of every object from the colouring of bright sunshine to one sad universal tint of dingy purple, the melancholy lowing of the cattle, and the short, but remarkable suspension of all labour, gave something of mystery and awe to the scene that we shall long remember.
Despite the intense cold, we spent the entire time outdoors, on a rising hill by the river; from this spot, many beautiful sights were visible: the quick shifting and changing of shadows, the dark hue of the wide Potomac that seemed to absorb the faint light from its snow-covered banks, the gradual transition of everything from the bright sunlight to a sad, uniform shade of dull purple, the mournful lowing of the cattle, and the brief yet striking pause in all work created an atmosphere of mystery and awe that we will remember for a long time.
During the following months I occupied myself partly in revising my notes, and arranging these pages; and partly in making myself acquainted, as much as possible, with the literature of the country.
During the next few months, I spent some time revising my notes and organizing these pages, and I also focused on learning as much as I could about the country's literature.
While reading and transcribing my notes, I underwent a strict self-examination. I passed in review all I had seen, all I had felt, and scrupulously challenged every expression of disapprobation; the result was, that I omitted in transcription much that I had written, as containing unnecessary details of things which had displeased me; yet, as I did so, I felt strongly that there was no exaggeration in them; but such details, though true, might be ill-natured, and I retained no more than were necessary to convey the general impressions received. While thus reviewing my notes, I discovered that many points, which all scribbling travellers are expected to notice, had been omitted; but a few pages of miscellaneous observations will, I think, supply all that can be expected from so idle a pen.
While going through and transcribing my notes, I really took a hard look at myself. I reviewed everything I had seen and felt, carefully questioning every bit of criticism I had. As a result, I left out a lot of what I wrote because it included unnecessary details about things that bothered me; however, I felt strongly that there was no exaggeration in those details. But even though they were true, they might come off as petty, so I kept only what was needed to convey the overall impressions I gathered. While reviewing my notes, I realized that I missed many things that all travel writers are expected to mention, but I believe a few pages of random observations will provide everything that's reasonable to expect from such a leisurely writer.
CHAPTER XXVIII
American Cooking—Evening Parties—Dress—Sleighing—Money-getting Habits—Tax-Gatherer’s Notice—Indian Summer—Anecdote of the Duke of Saxe-Weimar
American Cooking—Evening Parties—Dress—Sleighing—Money-making Habits—Tax Collector’s Notice—Indian Summer—Anecdote of the Duke of Saxe-Weimar
In relating all I know of America, I surely must not omit so important a feature as the cooking. There are sundry anomalies in the mode of serving even a first-rate table; but as these are altogether matters of custom, they by no means indicate either indifference or neglect in this important business; and whether castors are placed on the table or on the sideboard; whether soup, fish, patties, and salad be eaten in orthodox order or not, signifies but little. I am hardly capable, I fear, of giving a very erudite critique on the subject; general observations therefore must suffice. The ordinary mode of living is abundant, but not delicate. They consume an extraordinary quantity of bacon. Ham and beaf-steaks appear morning, noon, and night. In eating, they mix things together with the strangest incongruity imaginable. I have seen eggs and oysters eaten together: the sempiternal ham with apple-sauce; beefsteak with stewed peaches; and salt fish with onions. The bread is everywhere excellent, but they rarely enjoy it themselves, as they insist upon eating horrible half-baked hot rolls both morning and evening. The butter is tolerable; but they have seldom such cream as every little dairy produces in England; in fact, the cows are very roughly kept, compared with our’s. Common vegetables are abundant and very fine. I never saw sea-cale or cauliflowers, and either from the want of summer rain, or the want of care, the harvest of green vegetables is much sooner over than with us. They eat the Indian corn in a great variety of forms; sometimes it is dressed green, and eaten like peas; sometimes it is broken to pieces when dry, boiled plain, and brought to table like rice; this dish is called hominy. The flour of it is made into at least a dozen different sorts of cakes; but in my opinion all bad. This flour, mixed in the proportion of one-third with fine wheat, makes by far the best bread I ever tasted.
In sharing everything I know about America, I definitely can’t skip over the important topic of cooking. There are various quirks in how even a top-notch meal is served; however, since these are just customs, they don’t really reflect any lack of care or attention to this essential aspect. Whether condiments are placed on the table or on the side, or whether soup, fish, pastries, and salad are eaten in traditional order or not, really doesn't matter much. I’m probably not the best person to give a deeply knowledgeable review on this, so general observations will have to do. The typical way of living offers plenty of food, but not much finesse. They consume an enormous amount of bacon. Ham and beef steaks make an appearance for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. When they eat, they mix things together in the oddest combinations. I've seen them eat eggs and oysters together; the ever-present ham with apple sauce; beef steak with stewed peaches; and salted fish with onions. The bread is generally excellent, but they hardly enjoy it since they insist on having terrible half-baked hot rolls both morning and night. The butter is decent, but they rarely have the kind of cream that's produced by all the little dairies in England; in fact, the cows are kept in much worse conditions compared to ours. Common vegetables are plentiful and quite good. I’ve never seen sea kale or cauliflower, and either because of a lack of summer rain or care, the harvest of green vegetables ends much sooner than it does for us. They eat corn in many different ways; sometimes it’s cooked fresh and eaten like peas; other times, it’s broken into pieces when dry, boiled plain, and served like rice; this dish is called hominy. The flour from it is made into at least a dozen different types of cakes, but in my opinion, they are all bad. However, when this flour is mixed one-third with fine wheat flour, it produces the best bread I've ever tasted.
I never saw turbot, salmon, or fresh cod; but the rock and shad are excellent. There is a great want of skill in the composition of sauces; not only with fish, but with every thing. They use very few made dishes, and I never saw any that would be approved by our savants. They have an excellent wild duck, called the Canvass Back, which, if delicately served, would surpass the black cock; but the game is very inferior to our’s; they have no hares, and I never saw a pheasant. They seldom indulge in second courses, with all their ingenious temptations to the eating a second dinner; but almost every table has its dessert, (invariably pronounced desart) which is placed on the table before the cloth is removed, and consists of pastry, preserved fruits, and creams. They are “extravagantly fond,” to use their own phrase, of puddings, pies, and all kinds of “sweets,” particularly the ladies; but are by no means such connoisseurs in soups and ragouts as the gastronomes of Europe. Almost every one drinks water at table, and by a strange contradiction, in the country where hard drinking is more prevalent than in any other, there is less wine taken at dinner; ladies rarely exceed one glass, and the great majority of females never take any. In fact, the hard drinking, so universally acknowledged, does not take place at jovial dinners, but, to speak plain English, in solitary dram-drinking. Coffee is not served immediately after dinner, but makes part of the serious matter of tea-drinking, which comes some hours later. Mixed dinner parties of ladies and gentlemen are very rare, and unless several foreigners are present, but little conversation passes at table. It certainly does not, in my opinion, add to the well ordering a dinner table, to set the gentlemen at one end of it, and the ladies at the other; but it is very rarely that you find it otherwise.
I never saw turbot, salmon, or fresh cod, but the rock fish and shad are great. There's a serious lack of skill in making sauces—not just for fish, but for everything. They use very few prepared dishes, and I never saw any that would be praised by our experts. They have a great wild duck called the Canvass Back, which, if served nicely, would beat the black cock; however, the game is much lesser than ours; they have no hares, and I never saw a pheasant. They rarely have second courses, despite all their clever temptations to have a second dinner; almost every table has its dessert, (always pronounced desart) which is put on the table before the tablecloth is taken away, and consists of pastries, preserved fruits, and creams. They are "extravagantly fond," as they say, of puddings, pies, and all kinds of "sweets," especially the ladies; but they aren't nearly as knowledgeable about soups and stews as the gourmets of Europe. Almost everyone drinks water at the table, and strangely enough, in a country where heavy drinking is more common than anywhere else, wine is less often consumed at dinner; ladies rarely have more than one glass, and most women don’t drink any at all. In fact, the heavy drinking that everyone talks about doesn’t happen at lively dinners, but, to put it plainly, in solitary drinking. Coffee isn't served right after dinner, but is part of the more serious tea-drinking that occurs a few hours later. Mixed dinner parties with both ladies and gentlemen are very rare, and unless several foreigners are around, not much conversation happens at the table. In my opinion, it doesn't help the organization of a dinner table to have the men on one end and the women on the other; but it's very rarely set up any other way.
Their large evening parties are supremely dull; the men sometimes play cards by themselves, but if a lady plays, it must not be for money; no ecarte, no chess; very little music, and that little lamentably bad. Among the blacks, I heard some good voices, singing in tune; but I scarcely ever heard a white American, male or female, go through an air without being out of tune before the end of it; nor did I ever meet any trace of science in the singing I heard in society. To eat inconceivable quantities of cake, ice, and pickled oysters—and to show half their revenue in silks and satins, seem to be the chief object they have in these parties.
Their big evening parties are incredibly boring; the men sometimes play cards by themselves, but if a woman plays, it can't be for money; no ecarte, no chess; very little music, and the little there is is disappointingly bad. Among the Black guests, I heard some good voices singing in tune, but I hardly ever heard a white American, male or female, perform a song without going out of tune before finishing it; nor did I ever notice any signs of training in the singing I heard at social gatherings. Eating huge amounts of cake, ice, and pickled oysters—and displaying half their income in silks and satins—seems to be their main focus during these parties.
The most agreeable meetings, I was assured by all the young people, were those to which no married women are admitted; of the truth of this statement I have not the least doubt. These exclusive meetings occur frequently, and often last to a late hour; on these occasions, I believe, they generally dance. At regular balls, married ladies are admitted, but seldom take much part in the amusement. The refreshments are always profuse and costly, but taken in a most uncomfortable manner. I have known many private balls, where every thing was on the most liberal scale of expense, where the gentlemen sat down to supper in one room, while the ladies took theirs, standing, in another.
The young people all assured me that the best gatherings are the ones where no married women are allowed; I have no doubt about that. These exclusive meetings happen often and usually go on until late at night; I believe they mostly dance during these events. At regular balls, married women can attend, but they rarely get involved in the fun. The snacks and drinks are always plentiful and expensive, but they're served in a really awkward way. I’ve seen many private parties where everything was done on a grand budget, but the men would sit down for dinner in one room while the women had to stand and eat in another.
What we call picnics are very rare, and when attempted, do not often succeed well. The two sexes can hardly mix for the greater part of a day without great restraint and ennui; it is quite contrary to their general habits; the favourite indulgences of the gentlemen (smoking cigars and drinking spirits), can neither be indulged in with decency, nor resigned with complacency.
What we refer to as picnics are pretty uncommon, and when they do happen, they often don't go very well. Men and women can barely spend most of a day together without feeling a lot of pressure and boredom; it's just not in line with their usual behaviors. The preferred activities of guys (smoking cigars and drinking alcohol) can't be done respectfully, nor can they be given up without complaint.
The ladies have strange ways of adding to their charms. They powder themselves immoderately, face, neck, and arms, with pulverised starch; the effect is indescribably disagreeable by daylight, and not very favourable at any time. They are also most unhappily partial to false hair, which they wear in surprising quantities; this is the more to be lamented, as they generally have very fine hair of their own. I suspect this fashion to arise from an indolent mode of making their toilet, and from accomplished ladies’ maids not being very abundant; it is less trouble to append a bunch of waving curls here, there, and every where, than to keep their native tresses in perfect order.
The ladies have some odd ways of enhancing their beauty. They excessively apply powdered starch to their face, neck, and arms; the result is incredibly unappealing in daylight and not great at any time. They also have an unfortunate obsession with fake hair, which they wear in excessive amounts; this is particularly unfortunate since they usually have beautiful hair of their own. I suspect this trend comes from a lazy approach to getting ready and the scarcity of skilled maids; it's easier to just add some curls here and there than to keep their natural hair perfectly styled.
Though the expense of the ladies’ dress greatly exceeds, in proportion to their general style of living, that of the ladies of Europe, it is very far (excepting in Philadelphia) from being in good taste. They do not consult the seasons in the colours or in the style of their costume; I have often shivered at seeing a young beauty picking her way through the snow with a pale rose-coloured bonnet, set on the very top of her head: I knew one young lady whose pretty little ear was actually frostbitten from being thus exposed. They never wear muffs or boots, and appear extremely shocked at the sight of comfortable walking shoes and cotton stockings, even when they have to step to their sleighs over ice and snow. They walk in the middle of winter with their poor little toes pinched into a miniature slipper, incapable of excluding as much moisture as might bedew a primrose. I must say in their excuse, however, that they have, almost universally, extremely pretty feet. They do not walk well, nor, in fact, do they ever appear to advantage when in movement. I know not why this should be, for they have abundance of French dancing-masters among them, but somehow or other it is the fact. I fancied I could often trace a mixture of affectation and of shyness in their little mincing unsteady step, and the ever changing position of the hands. They do not dance well; perhaps I should rather say they do not look well when dancing; lovely as their faces are, they cannot, in a position that exhibits the whole person, atone for the want of tournure, and for the universal defect in the formation of the bust, which is rarely full, or gracefully formed.
Though the cost of women's clothing is much higher relative to their overall lifestyle compared to ladies in Europe, it often lacks good taste (except in Philadelphia). They don’t consider the seasons when choosing colors or styles for their outfits; I've often shivered while watching a young woman navigate through the snow wearing a pale rose-colored bonnet perched precariously on her head. I knew one young woman whose delicate ear was actually frostbitten from being so exposed. They never wear muffs or boots, and they seem really shocked at the sight of comfortable walking shoes and cotton stockings, even when they have to step over ice and snow to get to their sleighs. They walk in the middle of winter with their poor little toes crammed into tiny slippers that barely keep out any moisture. I must admit, though, that they generally have very pretty feet. They don’t walk well, nor do they ever seem to look good when they’re moving. I can’t say why this is, as they have plenty of French dancing instructors among them, but it’s just a fact. I often think there’s a mix of affectation and shyness in their tiny, unsteady steps and the way their hands are always shifting positions. They don’t dance well; perhaps I should say they don’t look good while dancing; despite their lovely faces, they don’t compensate for the lack of form and the common issue with their busts, which are rarely full or gracefully shaped.
I never saw an American man walk or stand well; notwithstanding their frequent militia drillings, they are nearly all hollow chested and round shouldered: perhaps this is occasioned by no officer daring to say to a brother free-born “hold up your head;” whatever the cause, the effect is very remarkable to a stranger. In stature, and in physiognomy, a great majority of the population, both male and female, are strikingly handsome, but they know not how to do their own honours; half as much comeliness elsewhere would produce ten times as much effect.
I’ve never seen an American man walk or stand well; despite their frequent militia drills, almost all of them have hollow chests and rounded shoulders. Maybe this is because no officer would dare to tell a fellow free man to "hold up your head." Whatever the reason, the result is very noticeable to a newcomer. In terms of height and appearance, most of the population, both men and women, are really good-looking, but they don’t know how to present themselves properly; even half as much attractiveness in other places would make a much bigger impression.
Nothing can exceed their activity and perseverance in all kinds of speculation, handicraft, and enterprise, which promises a profitable pecuniary result. I heard an Englishman, who had been long resident in America, declare that in following, in meeting, or in overtaking, in the street, on the road, or in the field, at the theatre, the coffee-house, or at home, he had never overheard Americans conversing without the word DOLLAR being pronounced between them. Such unity of purpose, such sympathy of feeling, can, I believe, be found nowhere else, except, perhaps, in an ants’ nest. The result is exactly what might be anticipated. This sordid object, for ever before their eyes, must inevitably produce a sordid tone of mind, and, worse still, it produces a seared and blunted conscience on all questions of probity. I know not a more striking evidence of the low tone of morality which is generated by this universal pursuit of money, than the manner in which the New England States are described by Americans. All agree in saying that they present a spectacle of industry and prosperity delightful to behold, and this is the district and the population most constantly quoted as the finest specimen of their admirable country; yet I never met a single individual in any part of the Union who did not paint these New Englanders as sly, grinding, selfish, and tricking. The yankees (as the New Englanders are called) will avow these qualities themselves with a complacent smile, and boast that no people on the earth can match them at over reaching in a bargain. I have heard them unblushingly relate stories of their cronies and friends, which, if believed among us, would banish the heroes from the fellowship of honest men for ever; and all this is uttered with a simplicity which sometimes led me to doubt if the speakers knew what honour and honesty meant. Yet the Americans declare that “they are the most moral people upon earth.” Again and again I have heard this asserted, not only in conversation, and by their writings, but even from the pulpit. Such broad assumption of superior virtue demands examination, and after four years of attentive and earnest observation and enquiry, my honest conviction is, that the standard of moral character in the United States is very greatly lower than in Europe. Of their religion, as it appears outwardly, I have had occasion to speak frequently; I pretend not to judge the heart, but, without any uncharitable presumption, I must take permission to say, that both Protestant England and Catholic France show an infinitely superior religious and moral aspect to mortal observation, both as to reverend decency of external observance, and as to the inward fruit of honest dealing between man and man.
Nothing surpasses their energy and determination in all sorts of speculation, craftsmanship, and ventures that promise a profitable financial outcome. I heard an Englishman, who had lived in America for a long time, say that whenever he encountered Americans—whether in the street, on the road, in the fields, at the theater, at a coffeehouse, or at home—he never heard them talking without the word DOLLAR coming up. Such singular focus and shared sentiment, I believe, can only be found elsewhere in an ants' nest. The outcome is exactly what you might expect. This material goal, always in their sights, inevitably creates a materialistic mindset, and, worse, it leads to a dulled and desensitized conscience regarding issues of honesty. I can’t think of a more striking example of the low moral standards generated by this universal chase for money than how Americans describe the New England States. Everyone agrees that these states showcase a scene of industry and prosperity that is wonderful to see, and they are often cited as the finest example of their admirable country; yet I have never met a single person in any part of the Union who didn’t describe these New Englanders as sneaky, hardworking, selfish, and deceitful. The Yankees (as the New Englanders are known) will admit to these traits themselves with a satisfied grin, bragging that no one on Earth can outsmart them in a deal. I have heard them tell stories about their friends and acquaintances that, if believed here, would kick the heroes out of the community of honest individuals forever; and all this is said with a straightforwardness that sometimes made me question whether the speakers understood what honor and honesty meant. Yet Americans claim that "they are the most moral people on Earth." Time and again, I have heard this asserted, not only in conversations and writings but even from the pulpit. Such bold claims of superior virtue warrant scrutiny, and after four years of careful and sincere observation and inquiry, my honest belief is that the standard of moral character in the United States is significantly lower than in Europe. Regarding their religion, as it appears on the surface, I have had many occasions to speak; I don’t presume to judge the heart, but without any uncharitable assumptions, I must say that both Protestant England and Catholic France display a vastly superior religious and moral image to mortal observation, in terms of reverent decency of external practices and the genuine ethics of dealing with one another.
In other respects I think no one will be disappointed who visits the country, expecting to find no more than common sense might teach him to look for, namely, a vast continent, by far the greater part of which is still in the state in which nature left it, and a busy, bustling, industrious population, hacking and hewing their way through it. What greatly increases the interest of this spectacle, is the wonderful facility for internal commerce, furnished by the rivers, lakes, and canals, which thread the country in every direction, producing a rapidity of progress in all commercial and agricultural speculation altogether unequalled. This remarkable feature is perceptible in every part of the union into which the fast spreading population has hitherto found its way, and forms, I think, the most remarkable and interesting peculiarity of the country. I hardly remember a single town where vessels of some description or other may not constantly be seen in full activity.
In other ways, I think no one will be let down who visits the country, expecting to find just what common sense would suggest: a vast continent, most of which is still untouched by human hands, and a busy, hardworking population carving their path through it. What makes this scene even more fascinating is the amazing ease of internal trade provided by the rivers, lakes, and canals that crisscross the country, leading to an unmatched speed of development in all commercial and agricultural ventures. This standout feature can be seen in every part of the nation where the rapidly growing population has moved, and I believe it represents the most notable and interesting characteristic of the country. I can hardly recall a single town where some kind of vessel isn’t regularly seen bustling with activity.
Their carriages of every kind are very unlike ours; those belonging to private individuals seem all constructed with a view to summer use, for which they are extremely well calculated, but they are by no means comfortable in winter. The waggons and cars are built with great strength, which is indeed necessary, from the roads they often have to encounter. The stagecoaches are heavier and much less comfortable than those of France; to those of England they can bear no comparison. I never saw any harness that I could call handsome, nor any equipage which, as to horses, carriage, harness, and servants, could be considered as complete. The sleighs are delightful, and constructed at so little expense that I wonder we have not all got them in England, lying by, in waiting for the snow, which often remains with us long enough to permit their use. Sleighing is much more generally enjoyed by night than by day, for what reason I could never discover, unless it be, that no gentlemen are to be found disengaged from business in the mornings. Nothing, certainly, can be more agreeable than the gliding smoothly and rapidly along, deep sunk in soft furs, the moon shining with almost midday splendour, the air of crystal brightness, and the snow sparkling on every side, as if it were sprinkled with diamonds. And then the noiseless movement of the horses, so mysterious and unwonted, and the gentle tinkling of the bells you meet and carry, all help at once to soothe and excite the spirits: in short, I had not the least objection to sleighing by night, I only wished to sleigh by day also.
Their carriages are very different from ours; those owned by individuals seem designed mainly for summer use, which they are extremely well suited for, but they're not comfortable in winter at all. The wagons and carts are built very sturdily, which is necessary because of the rough roads they often face. The stagecoaches are heavier and much less comfortable than those in France; they don't compare at all to those in England. I’ve never seen any harness that I would call attractive, nor any setup that, when it comes to horses, carriage, harness, and drivers, could be considered complete. The sleighs are delightful and made so inexpensively that I’m surprised we don’t all have them in England, ready for when the snow arrives, which often stays long enough for us to use them. Sleighing is enjoyed much more at night than during the day, for reasons I can't figure out, unless it’s that no gentlemen are free from business in the mornings. Nothing can be more pleasant than gliding smoothly and swiftly along, deeply settled in soft furs, with the moon shining as brightly as midday, the air crystal clear, and the snow sparkling all around like it's sprinkled with diamonds. And the quiet movement of the horses, so mysterious and unusual, along with the gentle jingling of the bells you encounter and carry, all serve to both soothe and excite the spirit: in short, I had no objections to sleighing at night; I just wished to sleigh during the day too.
Almost every resident in the country has a carriage they call a carryall, which name I suspect to be a corruption of the cariole so often mentioned in the pretty Canadian story of Emily Montagu. It is clumsy enough, certainly, but extremely convenient, and admirably calculated, with its thick roof and moveable draperies, for every kind of summer excursion.
Almost every person in the country has a carriage they call a carryall, which I think is a twist on the cariole mentioned frequently in the charming Canadian story of Emily Montagu. While it’s definitely clunky, it’s very convenient and perfectly designed, with its sturdy roof and adjustable curtains, for all types of summer outings.
Their steam-boats, were the social arrangements somewhat improved, would be delightful, as a mode of travelling; but they are very seldom employed for excursions of mere amusement: nor do I remember seeing pleasure-boats, properly so called, at any of the numerous places where they might be used with so much safety and enjoyment.
Their steamboats, if social arrangements were a bit better, would be great for traveling. However, they are rarely used for just fun trips. I also don't recall seeing any actual pleasure boats at the many places where they could be used safely and enjoyed.
How often did our homely adage recur to me, “All work and no play would make Jack a dull boy;” Jonathan is a very dull boy. We are by no means so gay as our lively neighbours on the other side the Channel, but, compared with Americans, we are whirligigs and tetotums; every day is a holyday, and every night a festival.
How often did our simple saying come to mind, “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy;” Jonathan is a really dull boy. We’re by no means as cheerful as our lively neighbors across the Channel, but compared to Americans, we’re like spinning tops and tops; every day is a holiday, and every night is a party.
Perhaps if the ladies had quite their own way, a little more relaxation would be permitted; but there is one remarkable peculiarity in their manners which precludes the possibility of any dangerous outbreaking of the kind: few ladies have any command of ready money entrusted to them. I have been a hundred times present when bills for a few dollars, perhaps for one, have been brought for payment to ladies living in perfectly easy circumstances, who have declared themselves without money, and referred the claimant to their husbands for payment. On every occasion where immediate disbursement is required it is the same; even in shopping for ready cash they say, “send a bill home with the things, and my husband will give you a draft.”
Maybe if the ladies had things their way, they would be allowed a bit more relaxation; but there's one notable thing about their behavior that prevents any kind of dangerous outburst: few ladies have control over cash that’s given to them. I've seen it a hundred times when bills for just a few dollars—sometimes even for just one—have been presented to women living in completely comfortable circumstances, who declared they had no money and sent the bill to their husbands for payment. Whenever immediate cash is needed, it’s always the same; even when shopping for things that need to be paid for upfront, they'll say, “just send the bill home with the items, and my husband will give you a check.”
I think that it was during my stay at Washington, that I was informed of a government regulation, which appeared to me curious; I therefore record it here.
I think it was during my time in Washington that I learned about a government regulation that seemed interesting to me, so I’ll note it down here.
Every Deputy Post-Master is required to insert in his return the title of every newspaper received at his office for distribution. This return is laid before the Secretary of State, who, perfectly knowing the political character of each newspaper, is thus enabled to feel the pulse of every limb of the monster mob. This is a well imagined device for getting a peep at the politics of a country where newspapers make part of the daily food, but is it quite consistent with their entire freedom? I do not believe we have any such tricks to regulate the disposal of offices and appointments.
Every Deputy Postmaster has to include in their report the title of every newspaper received at their office for distribution. This report is submitted to the Secretary of State, who, knowing the political stance of each newspaper, is able to gauge the mood of the public. This is a clever way to get insight into the politics of a country where newspapers are a daily staple, but is it fully in line with complete freedom? I don't think we have any such methods to manage the distribution of offices and appointments.
I believe it was in Indiana that Mr. T. met with a printed notice relative to the payment of taxes, which I preserved as a curious sample of the manner in which the free citizens are coaxed and reasoned into obeying the laws.
I think it was in Indiana that Mr. T. came across a printed notice about paying taxes, which I kept as an interesting example of how free citizens are persuaded and reasoned into following the laws.
“LOOK OUT DELINQUENTS”
“Watch out, troublemakers”
“Those indebted to me for taxes, fees, notes, and accounts, are specially requested to call and pay the same on or before the 1st day of December, 1828, as no longer indulgence will be given. I have called time and again, by advertisement and otherwise, to little effect; but now the time has come when my situation requires immediate payment from all indebted to me. It is impossible for me to pay off the amount of the duplicates of taxes and my other debts without recovering the same of those from whom it is due. I am at a loss to know the reason why those charged with taxes neglect to pay; from the negligence of many it would seem that they think the money is mine, or I have funds to discharge the taxes due to the State, and that I can wait with them until it suits their convenience to pay. The money is not mine; neither have I the funds to settle amount of the duplicate. My only resort is to collect; in doing so I should be sorry to have to resort to the authority given me by law for the recovery of the same. It should be the first object of every good citizen to pay his taxes, for it is in that way government is supported. Why are taxes assessed unless they are collected? Depend upon it, I shall proceed to collect agreeably to law, so govern yourselves accordingly.
“Those who owe me money for taxes, fees, notes, and accounts are strongly encouraged to come and pay by December 1st, 1828, as I will not be able to wait any longer. I've reached out many times, through advertisements and other means, but to little effect; however, now I urgently need these payments from everyone who owes me. I cannot settle the amount of my duplicate taxes and other debts without collecting from those who owe me. I'm baffled as to why people who owe taxes don't pay; it seems like some think the money is mine or that I have funds to cover the taxes owed to the State, and that I can wait until it’s convenient for them to pay. The money is not mine; I do not have the funds to cover the duplicate amount. My only option now is to collect; I would prefer not to use the legal authority given to me for recovery. Every good citizen should prioritize paying their taxes, as this is how the government is supported. Why assess taxes if they won't be collected? Rest assured, I will begin the collection process according to the law, so please plan accordingly.”
JOHN SPENCER,
Sh’ff and Collector, D.C.
JOHN SPENCER,
Sheriff and Collector, D.C.
Nov. 20, 1828.”
“N.B. On Thursday, the 27th inst. A. St. Clair and Geo. H. Dunn,
Esqrs. depart for Indianopolis; I wish as many as can pay to do so, to enable
me to forward as much as possible, to save the twenty-one per cent, that will
be charged against me after the 8th of December next.
Nov. 20, 1828.”
“Note: On Thursday, the 27th of this month, A. St. Clair and Geo. H. Dunn will be heading to Indianapolis. I hope as many people as possible can contribute to help me send as much as I can, to avoid the twenty-one percent fee that will be charged to me after December 8th.”
JS.”
JS.
The first autumn I passed in America, I was surprised to find a great and very oppressive return of heat, accompanied with a heavy mistiness in the air, long after the summer heats were over; when this state of the atmosphere comes on, they say, “we have got to the Indian summer.” On desiring to have this phrase explained, I was told that the phenomenon described as the Indian Summer was occasioned by the Indians setting fire to the woods, which spread heat and smoke to a great distance; but I afterwards met with the following explanation, which appears to me much more reasonable. “The Indian summer is so called because, at the particular period of the year in which it obtains, the Indians break up their village communities, and go to the interior to prepare for their winter hunting. This season seems to mark a dividing line, between the heat of summer, and the cold of winter, and is, from its mildness, suited to these migrations. The cause of this heat is the slow combustion of the leaves and other vegetable matter of the boundless and interminable forests. Those who at this season of the year have penetrated these forests, know all about it. To the feet the heat is quite sensible, whilst the ascending vapour warms every thing it embraces, and spreading out into the wide atmosphere, fills the circuit of the heavens with its peculiar heat and smokiness.”
The first autumn I spent in America, I was surprised by a strong and heavy return of heat, along with thick fog in the air, long after the summer heat had passed. When this atmospheric condition occurs, people say, “we’re experiencing Indian summer.” When I asked for an explanation of this term, I was told that the phenomenon known as Indian Summer was caused by the Indians setting fire to the woods, which spread heat and smoke over a wide area. However, I later encountered a different explanation that seemed much more reasonable to me. “The Indian summer is named because, during this specific time of year, the Indians break up their village communities and head inland to prepare for their winter hunts. This season acts as a transition between the heat of summer and the cold of winter and its mild weather is perfect for these migrations. The reason for this heat is the slow burning of leaves and other plant matter in the vast, endless forests. Those who venture into these forests during this time know all about it. The heat is quite noticeable at your feet, and the rising vapor warms everything it surrounds, spreading out into the open air and filling the sky with its distinct warmth and smokiness.”
This unnatural heat sufficiently accounts for the sickliness of the American autumn. The effect of it is extremely distressing to the nerves, even when the general health continues good; to me, it was infinitely more disagreeable than the glowing heat of the dog-days.
This unnatural heat explains the sickness of the American autumn. Its impact is very distressing to the nerves, even when overall health remains fine; for me, it was much more unpleasant than the intense heat of the dog days.
A short time before we arrived in America, the Duke of Saxe-Weimar made a tour of the United States. I heard many persons speak of his unaffected and amiable manners, yet he could not escape the dislike which every trace of gentlemanly feeling is sure to create among the ordinary class of Americans. As an amusing instance of this, I made the following extract from a newspaper.
A little while before we got to America, the Duke of Saxe-Weimar traveled across the United States. I heard many people talk about his genuine and friendly demeanor, but he couldn’t avoid the resentment that any sign of gentlemanly behavior tends to provoke among regular Americans. As a funny example of this, I’ve included the following excerpt from a newspaper.
“A correspondent of the Charlestown Gazette tells an anecdote connected with the Duke of Saxe-Weimar’s recent journey through our country, which we do not recollect to have heard before, although some such story is told of the veritable Capt. Basil Hall. The scene occurred on the route between Augusta and Milledgeville; it seems that the sagacious Duke engaged three or four, or more seats, in the regular stage, for the accommodation of himself and suite, and thought by this that he had secured the monopoly of the vehicle. Not so, however; a traveller came along, and entered his name upon the book, and secured his seat by payment of the customary charges. To the Duke’s great surprise on entering the stage, he found our traveller comfortably housed in one of the most eligible seats, wrapt up in his fear-nought, and snoring like a buffalo. The Duke, greatly irritated, called for the question of consideration. He demanded, in broken English, the cause of the gross intrusion, and insisted in a very princely manner, though not, it seems in very princely language, upon the incumbent vacating the seat in which he had made himself so impudently at home. But the Duke had yet to learn his first lesson of republicanism. The driver was one of those sturdy southrons, who can always, and at a moment’s warning, whip his weight in wild cats: and he as resolutely told the Duke, that the traveller was as good, if not a better man, than himself; and that no alteration of the existing arrangement could be permitted. Saxe-Weimar became violent at this opposition, so unlike any to which his education hitherto had ever subjected him, and threatened John with the application of the bamboo. This was one of those threats which in Georgia dialect would subject a man to “a rowing up salt river;” and, accordingly, down leaped our driver from his box, and peeling himself for the combat, he leaped about the vehicle in the most wild-boar style, calling upon the prince of a five acre patch to put his threat in execution. But he of the star refused to make up issue in the way suggested, contenting himself with assuring the enraged southron of a complaint to his excellency the Governor, on arriving at the seat of government. This threat was almost as unlucky as the former, for it wrought the individual for whom it was intended into that species of fury, which, through discriminating in its madness, is nevertheless without much limit in its violence, and he swore that the Governor might go to —, and for his part he would just as leave lick the Governor as the Duke; he’d like no better fun than to give both Duke and Governor a dressing in the same breath; could do it, he had little doubt, &c. &c.; and instigating one fist to diverge into the face of the marvelling and panic-stricken nobleman, with the other he thrust him down into a seat alongside the traveller, whose presence had been originally of such sore discomfort to his excellency, and bidding the attendants jump in with their discomfited master, he mounted his box in triumph, and went on his journey.” I fully believe that this brutal history would be as distasteful to the travelled and polished few who are to be found scattered through the Union, as it is to me: but if they do not deem the possibility of such a scene to be a national degradation, I differ from them. The American people (speaking of the great mass) have no more idea of what constitutes the difference between this “Prince of a five acre patch,” and themselves, than a dray-horse has of estimating the points of the elegant victor of the race-course. Could the dray-horse speak, when expected to yield the daintiest stall to his graceful rival, he would say, “a horse is a horse;” and is it not with the same logic that the transatlantic Houynnhnm puts down all superiority with “a man is a man?”
A writer for the Charlestown Gazette shares a story about the Duke of Saxe-Weimar’s recent trip through our country that we don't recall hearing before, even though a similar tale is told about the real Capt. Basil Hall. This incident happened on the route between Augusta and Milledgeville. It seems the clever Duke reserved three or four, or more, seats on the regular stagecoach for himself and his entourage, believing he had secured exclusive use of the vehicle. However, that was not the case; another traveler came along, added his name to the book, and paid the usual fees to secure his seat. To the Duke's surprise, when he entered the stage, he found this traveler comfortably settled in one of the best seats, bundled up in his blanket, and snoring loudly. The Duke, quite annoyed, demanded attention. He asked, in broken English, why this gross intrusion occurred and insisted, in a very princely manner, though not exactly in princely terms, that the man vacate the seat where he had made himself so unceremoniously at home. But the Duke had yet to learn his first lesson in republicanism. The driver was one of those tough Southern fellows who can always handle themselves, and he firmly told the Duke that the traveler was just as good, if not a better person than him, and that no changes to the current arrangement could be made. The Duke became furious at this unexpected defiance, which he had never experienced before, and threatened the driver with a beating. This threat, in Georgia slang, would mean a serious consequence for a man, so the driver jumped down from his perch, ready for a fight, and challenged the Duke to follow through with his threat. But the Duke refused to engage in this way, settling instead to assure the irritated Southerner that he would complain to Governor as soon as they reached the capital. This threat backfired too, igniting the man’s rage, who swore that the Governor could go to hell, and he’d just as soon beat the Governor as the Duke; he’d love nothing more than to take on both at once. With one fist, he struck the astonished nobleman’s face while shoving him down into a seat beside the traveler, who had originally made the Duke so uncomfortable. Then he ordered the attendants to join their frustrated master, climbed back onto his box in triumph, and continued on his way. I truly believe this brutal story would be just as distasteful to the few traveled and cultured individuals scattered across the Union as it is to me. But if they don’t consider the potential for such a scene to be a national embarrassment, I disagree. The American people (referring to the vast majority) have no more understanding of the difference between this “Prince of a five-acre patch” and themselves than a heavy draft horse does when it comes to the refined race winner. If the draft horse could speak, when asked to give way for his elegant rival, he would say, “a horse is a horse;” and isn’t it with the same reasoning that the European Houynhnm dismisses all superiority with, “a man is a man?”
This story justifies the reply of Talleyrand, when asked by Napoleon what he thought of the Americans, “Sire, ce sont des fiers cochons, et des cochons fiers.”
This story explains Talleyrand's response when Napoleon asked him what he thought of the Americans: “Sire, they are proud pigs, and proud pigs at that.”
CHAPTER XXIX
Literature—Extracts—Fine Arts—Education
Literature—Excerpts—Fine Arts—Education
The character of the American literature is, generally speaking, pretty justly appreciated in Europe. The immense exhalation of periodical trash, which penetrates into every cot and corner of the country, and which is greedily sucked in by all ranks, is unquestionably one great cause of its inferiority. Where newspapers are the principal vehicles of the wit and wisdom of a people, the higher graces of composition can hardly be looked for.
The nature of American literature is, in general, fairly well recognized in Europe. The overwhelming amount of periodical junk that spreads into every nook and cranny of the country, and that is eagerly consumed by all social classes, is undoubtedly a major reason for its shortcomings. When newspapers are the main sources of a people's wit and wisdom, the more refined qualities of writing are rarely expected.
That there are many among them who can write well, is most certain; but it is at least equally so, that they have little encouragement to exercise the power in any manner more dignified than becoming the editor of a newspaper or a magazine. As far as I could judge, their best writers are far from being the most popular. The general taste is decidedly bad; this is obvious, not only from the mass of slip-slop poured forth by the daily and weekly press, but from the inflated tone of eulogy in which their insect authors are lauded.
It's clear that many of them can write well, but it's just as clear that they have little motivation to use their skills in any way more respectable than becoming editors of newspapers or magazines. From what I could see, their best writers are far from the most popular. The overall taste is definitely poor; this is evident not only from the junk produced by daily and weekly publications but also from the exaggerated praise given to their mediocre authors.
To an American writer, I should think it must be a flattering distinction to escape the admiration of the newspapers. Few persons of taste, I imagine, would like such notice as the following, which I copied from a New York paper, where it followed the advertisement of a partnership volume of poems by a Mr, and Mrs. Brooks; but of such, are their literary notices chiefly composed.
To an American writer, it must be quite a compliment to avoid the praise of the newspapers. I doubt many people with good taste would want attention like this, which I found in a New York paper, appearing right after an ad for a collection of poems by Mr. and Mrs. Brooks; this is mainly what makes up their literary reviews.
“The lovers of impassioned and classical numbers may promise themselves much gratification from the muse of Brooks, while the many-stringed harp of his lady, the Norna of the Courier Harp, which none but she can touch, has a chord for every heart.”
“The fans of passionate and classical tunes can expect a lot of pleasure from Brooks' muse, while the multi-stringed harp of his lady, the Norna of the Courier Harp, which only she can play, has a string for every heart.”
Another obvious cause of inferiority in the national literature, is the very slight acquaintance with the best models of composition, which is thought necessary for persons called well educated. There may be reason for deprecating the lavish expense of time bestowed in England on the acquirement of Latin and Greek, and it may be doubtful whether the power of composing in these languages with correctness and facility, be worth all the labour it costs; but as long as letters shall be left on the earth, the utility of a perfect familiarity with the exquisite models of antiquity, cannot be doubted. I think I run no risk of contradiction, when I say that an extremely small proportion of the higher classes in America possess this familiar acquaintance with the classics. It is vain to suppose that translations may suffice. Noble as are the thoughts the ancients have left us, their power of expression is infinitely more important as a study to modern writers; and this no translation can furnish. Nor did it appear to me that their intimacy with modern literature was such as to assist them much in the formation of style. What they class as modern literature seems to include little beyond the English publications of the day.
Another clear reason for the shortcomings in our national literature is the very limited exposure to great writing that is considered necessary for those deemed well-educated. While there may be valid reasons to criticize the excessive amount of time spent in England on learning Latin and Greek, and it’s debatable whether mastering these languages with accuracy and ease is worth the effort, the importance of having a deep understanding of the timeless masterpieces of the past cannot be questioned as long as written words exist. I believe I can confidently state that a very small percentage of the upper classes in America have this deep familiarity with the classics. It’s pointless to think that translations alone are enough. The profound ideas left to us by the ancients are admirable, but their skill in expression is even more crucial for modern writers, and no translation can provide that. It also seems to me that their knowledge of modern literature is not sufficient to significantly aid them in developing their style. What they refer to as modern literature appears to consist of little more than the contemporary English publications.
To speak of Chaucer, or even Spenser, as a modern, appears to them inexpressibly ridiculous; and all the rich and varied eloquence of Italy, from Dante to Monti, is about as much known to them, as the Welsh effusions of Urien and Modred, to us.
To talk about Chaucer, or even Spenser, as modern seems completely ridiculous to them; and all the rich and diverse eloquence of Italy, from Dante to Monti, is about as familiar to them as the Welsh works of Urien and Modred are to us.
Rousseau, Voltaire, Diderot, &c., were read by the old federalists, but now they seem known more as naughty words, than as great names. I am much mistaken if a hundred untravelled Americans could be found, who have read Boileau or Le Fontaine. Still fewer are acquainted with that delightful host of French female writers, whose memoirs and letters sparkle in every page with unequalled felicity of style. The literature of Spain and Portugal is no better known, and as for “the wits of Queen Anne’s day,” they are laid en masse upon a shelf, in some score of very old-fashioned houses, together with Sherlock and Taylor, as much too antiquated to suit the immensely rapid progress of mind which distinguishes America.
Rousseau, Voltaire, Diderot, etc., were read by the old federalists, but now they seem to be recognized more as naughty words than as great names. I would be very surprised if we could find a hundred Americans who haven't traveled and who have read Boileau or La Fontaine. Even fewer are familiar with the delightful group of French female writers whose memoirs and letters shine with unmatched elegance. The literature of Spain and Portugal is just as poorly known, and as for “the wits of Queen Anne’s day,” they are all sitting on a shelf in a number of old-fashioned homes, alongside Sherlock and Taylor, considered far too outdated for the incredibly rapid advancement of thought that characterizes America.
The most perfect examples of English writing, either of our own, or of any former day, have assuredly not been produced by the imitation of any particular style; but the Fairy Queen would hardly have been written, if the Orlando had not; nor would Milton have been the perfect poet he was, had Virgil and Tasso been unknown to him. It is not that the scholar mimics in writing the phrases he has read, but that he can neither think, feel, nor express himself as he might have done, had his mental companionship been of a lower order.
The best examples of English writing, whether from our time or from the past, definitely haven’t come from copying a specific style. However, the Fairy Queen probably wouldn’t have been written if Orlando hadn’t come first; and Milton wouldn’t have been the great poet he was without knowing Virgil and Tasso. It’s not that the scholar just mimics the phrases he’s read, but rather that he can’t think, feel, or express himself as he could have if he had been surrounded by less influential minds.
They are great novel readers, but the market is chiefly furnished by England. They have, however, a few very good native novels. Mr. Flint’s Francis Berrian is delightful. There is a vigor and freshness in his writing that is exactly in accordance with what one looks for, in the literature of a new country; and yet, strange to say, it is exactly what is most wanting in that of America. It appeared to me that the style of their imaginative compositions was almost always affected, and inflated. Even in treating their great national subject of romance, the Indians, they are seldom either powerful or original. A few well known general features, moral and physical, are presented over and over again in all their Indian stories, till in reading them you lose all sense of individual character. Mr. Flint’s History of the Mississippi Valley is a work of great interest, and information, and will, I hope, in time find its way to England, where I think it is much more likely to be appreciated than in America.
They are avid readers of novels, but the market is mainly supplied by England. However, they do have a few really good native novels. Mr. Flint's *Francis Berrian* is delightful. There's a vigor and freshness in his writing that aligns with what you expect from the literature of a new country; yet, strangely enough, it’s exactly what's lacking in American literature. It seems to me that the style of their imaginative works is almost always affected and exaggerated. Even when addressing their great national theme of romance—the Indians—they are rarely either powerful or original. A few well-known general traits, both moral and physical, are repeated over and over in all their Indian stories, so much so that you end up losing track of individual character. Mr. Flint’s *History of the Mississippi Valley* is a work of great interest and information, and I hope it eventually finds its way to England, where I believe it will be much more appreciated than in America.
Dr. Channing is a writer too well known in England to require my testimony to his great ability. As a preacher he has, perhaps, hardly a rival any where. This gentleman is an Unitarian, and I was informed by several persons well acquainted with the literary character of the country, that nearly all their distinguished men were of this persuasion.
Dr. Channing is a writer so well known in England that I don’t need to vouch for his great talent. As a preacher, he probably has no equal anywhere. This gentleman is a Unitarian, and I've been told by several people who know the literary scene well that nearly all of the prominent figures there share this belief.
Mr. Pierpoint is a very eloquent preacher, and a sweet poet. His works are not so well known among us as .they ought to be. Mr. Everett has written some beautiful lines, and if I may judge from the specimens of his speeches, as preserved in the volumes intitled “Eloquence of the United States,” I should say that he shone more as a poet than an orator. But American fame has decided otherwise.
Mr. Pierpoint is a very articulate preacher and a talented poet. His works aren’t as well-known among us as they should be. Mr. Everett has written some beautiful lines, and based on the examples of his speeches found in the volumes titled “Eloquence of the United States,” I would say he stands out more as a poet than as a speaker. But American recognition says otherwise.
Mr. M. Flint, of Louisiana, has published a volume of poems which ought to be naturalised here. Mr. Hallock, of New York, has much facility of versification, and is greatly in fashion as a drawing-room poet, but I think he has somewhat too much respect for himself, and too little for his readers.
Mr. M. Flint, from Louisiana, has released a book of poems that should be accepted here. Mr. Hallock, from New York, is quite skilled at writing poetry and is very popular as a salon poet, but I feel he has a bit too much self-regard and not enough consideration for his audience.
It is, I think, Mr. Bryant who ranks highest as the poet of the Union. This is too lofty an eminence for me to attack; besides, “I am of another parish,” and therefore, perhaps, no very fair judge.
It’s, I believe, Mr. Bryant who stands out as the top poet of the Union. This is too high a position for me to challenge; also, “I belong to a different community,” and so, maybe, I’m not a very fair judge.
From miscellaneous poetry I made a great many extracts, but upon returning to them for transcription I thought that ill-nature and dulness, (‘oh ill-matched pair!’) would be more served by their insertion, than wholesome criticism.
From various poems, I made a lot of extracts, but when I went back to transcribe them, I felt that negativity and boredom, (‘oh, such a mismatched pair!’) would be better highlighted by including them than by providing constructive criticism.
The massive Fredoniad of Dr. Emmons, in forty cantos, I never read; but as I did not meet a single native who had, I hope this want of poetical enterprise will be excused.
The huge Fredoniad by Dr. Emmons, which has forty cantos, I never read; but since I didn’t come across a single local who had, I hope this lack of poetic ambition will be forgiven.
They have very few native tragedies; not more than half a dozen I believe, and those of very recent date. It would be ungenerous to fall heavily upon these; the attempt alone, nearly the most arduous a poet can make, is of itself honourable: and the success at least equal to that in any other department of literature.
They have very few native tragedies; not more than six, I believe, and those are quite recent. It would be unfair to criticize these harshly; the effort alone, which is one of the most challenging things a poet can do, is commendable in itself: and their success is at least on par with that in any other area of literature.
Mr. Paulding is a popular writer of novels; some of his productions have been recently republished in England. Miss Sedgwick is also well known among us; her “Hope Leslie” is a beautiful story. Mr. Washington Irving and Mr. Cooper have so decidedly chosen another field, whereon to reap their laurels, that it is hardly necessary to name them here.
Mr. Paulding is a well-known novelist; some of his works have recently been republished in England. Miss Sedgwick is also quite recognized among us; her “Hope Leslie” is a lovely story. Mr. Washington Irving and Mr. Cooper have clearly chosen a different path to earn their accolades, so it's not really necessary to mention them here.
I am not, of course, competent to form any opinion of their scientific works; but some papers which I read almost accidentally, appeared to me to be written with great clearness, and neatness of definition.
I’m not really qualified to judge their scientific work; however, some papers I came across almost by chance seemed to be written with great clarity and precision in their definitions.
It appears extraordinary that a people who loudly declare their respect for science, should be entirely without observatories. Neither at their seats of learning, nor in their cities, does any thing of the kind exist; nor did I in any direction hear of individuals, given to the study of astronomy.
It seems remarkable that a society that openly professes its respect for science has no observatories at all. There are none at their educational institutions or in their cities; nor did I come across anyone who is dedicated to the study of astronomy.
I had not the pleasure of making any acquaintance with Mr. Bowditch, of Boston, but I know that this gentleman ranks very high as a mathematician in the estimation of the scientific world of Europe.
I haven't had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Bowditch from Boston, but I know that he is highly regarded as a mathematician in the eyes of the scientific community in Europe.
Jefferson’s posthumous works were very generally circulated whilst I was in America. They are a mighty mass of mischief. He wrote with more perspicuity than he thought, and his hot-headed democracy has done a fearful injury to his country. Hollow and unsound as his doctrines are, they are but too palatable to a people, each individual of whom would rather derive his importance from believing that none are above him, than from the consciousness that in his station he makes part of a noble whole. The social system of Mr. Jefferson, if carried into effect, would make of mankind an unamalgamated mass of grating atoms, where the darling “I’m as good as you,” would soon take place of the law and the Gospel. As it is, his principles, though happily not fully put in action, have yet produced most lamentable results. The assumption of equality, however empty, is sufficient to tincture the manners of the poor with brutal insolence, and subjects the rich to the paltry expediency of sanctioning the falsehood, however deep their conviction that it is such. It cannot, I think, be denied that the great men of America attain to power and to fame, by eternally uttering what they know to be untrue. American citizens are not equal. Did Washington feel them to be so, when his word outweighed (so happily for them) the votes of thousands? Did Franklin think that all were equal when he shouldered his way from the printing press to the cabinet? True, he looked back in high good humour, and with his kindest smile told the poor devils whom he left behind, that they were all his equals; but Franklin did not speak the truth, and he knew it. The great, the immortal Jefferson himself, he who when past the three score years and ten, still taught young females to obey his nod, and so became the father of unnumbered generations of groaning slaves, what was his matin and his vesper hymn? “All men are born free and equal.” Did the venerable father of the gang believe it? Or did he too purchase his immortality by a lie?
Jefferson’s posthumous works were widely circulated while I was in America. They are a huge source of trouble. He wrote more clearly than he realized, and his extreme form of democracy has caused serious harm to his country. Although his ideas are hollow and flawed, they are too appealing to a people who would rather gain significance by believing that everyone is equal than by recognizing that, in their role, they are part of something greater. If Mr. Jefferson's social system were put into practice, it would turn humanity into a disjointed mass of conflicting individuals, where the cherished “I’m as good as you” would soon replace both law and morality. As it stands, his principles, though thankfully not fully implemented, have already led to very unfortunate outcomes. The idea of equality, no matter how empty, is enough to make the manners of the poor filled with brutal arrogance, while the rich are forced to endorse this falsehood, despite knowing better. I don't think it can be denied that the prominent figures in America achieve power and fame by constantly stating what they know is untrue. American citizens are not equal. Did Washington believe they were when his word carried more weight (which was fortunate for them) than the votes of thousands? Did Franklin think everyone was equal while he pushed his way from the printing press to the cabinet? Sure, he looked back with good humor and kindly told the struggling individuals he left behind that they were all his equals; but Franklin wasn’t telling the truth, and he knew it. The great, the immortal Jefferson himself, who even after turning seventy still commanded young women to follow his orders, thereby becoming the patriarch of countless generations of enslaved people, what was his morning and evening mantra? “All men are born free and equal.” Did the esteemed father of this ideology actually believe it? Or did he too secure his legacy through a lie?
From the five heavy volumes of the “Eloquence of the United States,” I made a few extracts, which I give more for the sake of their political interest, than for any purpose of literary criticism.
From the five large volumes of the “Eloquence of the United States,” I took a few excerpts, which I share more for their political relevance than for any literary critique.
Mr. Hancock (one of those venerated men who signed the act of independence), in speaking of England, thus expresses himself: “But if I was possessed of the gift of prophecy, I dare not (except by Divine command) unfold the leaves on which the destiny of that once powerful kingdom is inscribed.” It is impossible not to regret that Mr. Hancock should thus have let “I dare not, wait upon I would.” It would have been exceedingly edifying to have known beforehand all the terrible things the republic was about to do for us.
Mr. Hancock (one of those respected men who signed the Declaration of Independence) spoke of England, saying: “But if I had the gift of prophecy, I wouldn’t dare (unless commanded by God) reveal the pages that hold the destiny of that once-powerful kingdom.” It's hard not to feel disappointed that Mr. Hancock let “I dare not” outweigh “I would.” It would have been very enlightening to have known in advance all the awful things the republic was about to do for us.
This prophetic orator spoke the modest, yet awful words, above quoted, nearly sixty years ago; in these latter days men are become bolder, for in a modern 4th of July oration, Mr. Rush, without waiting, I think, for Divine command, gives the following amiable portrait of the British character.
This prophetic speaker shared the modest but striking words quoted above almost sixty years ago. Nowadays, people have become bolder, as seen in a recent 4th of July speech where Mr. Rush, without seeming to wait for Divine approval, gives this friendly description of the British character.
“In looking at Britain, we see a harshness of individual character in the general view of it, which is perceived and acknowledged by all Europe; a spirit of unbecoming censure as regards all customs and institutions not their own; a ferocity in some of their characteristics of national manners, pervading their very pastimes, which no other modern people are endued with the blunted sensibility to bear; an universal self-assumed superiority, not innocently manifesting itself in speculative sentiments among themselves, but unamiably indulged when with foreigners, of whatever description, in their own country, or when they themselves are the temporary sojourners in a foreign country; a code of criminal law that forgets to feel for human frailty, that sports with human misfortune, that has shed more blood in deliberate judicial severity for two centuries past, constantly increasing, too, in its sanguinary hue, than has ever been sanctioned by the jurisprudence of any ancient or modern nation, civilized and refined like herself; the merciless whippings in her army, peculiar to herself alone, the conspicuous commission and freest acknowledgment of vice in the upper classes; the overweening distinctions shown to opulence and birth, so destructive of a sound moral sentiment in the nation, so baffling to virtue. These are some of the traits that rise up to a contemplation of the inhabitants of this isle.”
“In looking at Britain, we see a harshness in the character of its people that’s recognized throughout Europe. There’s a tendency to harshly criticize customs and institutions that aren't their own. Some aspects of their national behavior, even in their leisure activities, show a fierceness that other modern societies might not be sensitive enough to tolerate. They often display a self-assumed superiority, which isn’t just present in their private discussions but is also unpleasantly evident in their interactions with foreigners, whether at home or when they’re visiting another country. Their criminal justice system seems to lack compassion for human weaknesses, treating human misfortunes lightly. It has caused more bloodshed in its severe judicial practices over the last two centuries—constantly increasing in its brutality—than any ancient or modern civilization that prides itself on being civilized and refined. The harsh punishments in their military are unique to them, and there’s an open acceptance of vice among the upper classes. The excessive emphasis on wealth and lineage undermines moral values in the nation and is a challenge to virtue. These are some of the characteristics that come to light when reflecting on the people of this island.”
Where is the alchymy that can extract from Captain Hall’s work one thousandth part of the ill-will contained in this one passage? Yet America has resounded from shore to shore with execrations against his barbarous calumnies.
Where is the magic that can pull out even a tiny fraction of the animosity found in this one passage from Captain Hall’s work? Yet America has echoed from coast to coast with anger against his cruel slanders.
But now we will listen to another tone. Let us see how Americans can praise. Mr. Everett, in a recent 4th of July oration, speaks thus:—
But now we will hear a different tone. Let’s see how Americans show their praise. Mr. Everett, in a recent 4th of July speech, says this:—
“We are authorised to assert, that the era of our independence dates the establishment of the only perfect organization of government.” Again, “Our government is in its theory perfect, and in its operation it is perfect also. Thus we have solved the great problem in human affairs.” And again, “A frame of government perfect in its principles has been brought down from the airy regions of Utopia, and has found a local habitation and a name in our country.”
“We are allowed to claim that the start of our independence marks the founding of the only ideal government organization.” Again, “Our government is theoretically perfect, and it operates perfectly as well. Thus, we have resolved the major issues in human matters.” And again, “A government structure perfect in its principles has descended from the lofty realms of Utopia and has found a home and a name in our nation.”
Among my miscellaneous reading, I got hold of an American publication giving a detailed, and, indeed, an official account of the capture of Washington by the British, in 1814. An event so long past, and of so little ultimate importance, is, perhaps, hardly worth alluding to; but there are some passages in the official documents which I thought very amusing.
Among my random reading, I came across an American publication providing a detailed, and truly official, account of the British capturing Washington in 1814. An event that's so far in the past and of minimal significance might not be worth mentioning; however, there are some parts in the official documents that I found quite entertaining.
At the very moment of receiving the attack of the British on the heights of Bladensburgh, there seems to have been a most curious puzzle among the American generals, as to where they were to be stationed, and what they were to do. It is stated that the British threw themselves forward in open order, advancing singly. The American general (Winden) goes on in his narrative to describe what followed, thus:
At the exact moment the British attacked the heights of Bladensburgh, the American generals appeared to be in a puzzling situation about where to position themselves and what actions to take. Reports indicate that the British advanced in a scattered formation, moving individually. The American general (Winden) continues in his account to describe what happened next, as follows:
“Our advanced riflemen now began to fire, and continued it for half a dozen rounds, when I observed them to run back to an orchard. They halted there, and seemed for a moment about returning to their original position, but in a few moments entirely broke and retired to the left of Stansburg’s line. The advanced artillery immediately followed the riflemen.
“Our skilled riflemen started firing and kept it up for about six shots. Then I saw them retreat to an orchard. They stopped there and seemed like they might go back to their original position, but soon they completely broke and fell back to the left of Stansburg’s line. The forward artillery immediately followed the riflemen.”
“The first three or four rockets fired by the enemy were much above the heads of Stansburg’s line; but the rockets having taken a more horizontal direction, an universal flight of the centre and left of this brigade was the consequence. The 5th regiment and the artillery still remained, and I hoped would prevent the enemy’s approach, but they advancing singly, their fire annoyed the 5th considerably, when I ordered it to retire, to put it out of the reach of the enemy. This order was, however, immediately countermanded, from an aversion to retire before the necessity became stronger, and from a hope that the enemy would issue in a body, and enable us to act upon him on terms of equality. But the enemy’s fire beginning to annoy the 5th still more, by wounding several of them, and a strong column passing up the road, and deploying on its left, I ordered them to retire; their retreat became a flight of absolute and total disorder.”
“The first three or four rockets fired by the enemy went well over Stansburg’s line; however, the rockets then changed to a more horizontal direction, causing a general retreat from the center and left of this brigade. The 5th regiment and the artillery stayed put, and I hoped they would stop the enemy’s advance, but as they moved in one by one, the enemy's fire significantly bothered the 5th, so I ordered them to fall back to avoid the enemy's reach. This order was quickly reversed, as there was a reluctance to retreat before it became absolutely necessary, and there was hope the enemy would advance as a group, allowing us to engage them on equal terms. However, as the enemy’s fire increasingly impacted the 5th, injuring several, and a strong column moved down the road and spread out to the left, I ordered them to withdraw; their retreat turned into a chaotic and complete rout.”
Of Beall’s regiment, the general gives the following succinct account—“It gave one or two ineffectual fires and fled.”
Of Beall’s regiment, the general provides the following brief description—“It made one or two unsuccessful shots and then ran away.”
In another place he says, piteously,—“The cavalry would do any thing but charge.”
In another place, he says, sadly, “The cavalry would do anything but charge.”
General Armstrong’s gentle and metaphysical account of the business was, that—“Without all doubt the determining cause of our disasters is to be found in the love of life.”
General Armstrong’s thoughtful and philosophical take on the situation was that—“Without a doubt, the main reason for our troubles lies in the love of life.”
This affair at Washington, which in its result was certainly advantageous to America, inasmuch as it caused the present beautiful capitol to be built in the place of the one we burnt, was, nevertheless, considered as a national calamity at the time. In a volume of miscellaneous poems I met with one, written with the patriotic purpose of cheering the country under it; one triplet struck me as rather alarming for us, however soothing to America.
This event in Washington, which ultimately benefited America by leading to the construction of the beautiful Capitol we have today instead of the one we burned, was viewed as a national tragedy at the time. In a collection of various poems, I came across one written with the patriotic aim of uplifting the country during this period; one triplet, however, seemed quite concerning for us, despite being comforting to America.
“Supposing George’s house at Kew
Were burnt, as we intend to do,
Would that be burning England too?”
“Imagine if George’s house at Kew
Were burned down, as we plan to do,
Would that mean we’re burning England too?”
I think I have before mentioned that no work of mere pleasantry has hitherto been found to answer; but a recent attempt of the kind as been made, with what success cannot as yet be decided. The editors are comedians belonging to the Boston company, and it is entitled “The American Comic Annual.” It is accompanied by etchings, somewhat in the manner, but by no means with the spirit of Cruikshank’s. Among the pleasantries of this lively volume are some biting attacks upon us, particularly upon our utter incapacity of speaking English. We really must engage a few American professors, or we shall lose all trace of classic purity in our language. As a specimen, and rather a favourable one, of the work, I transcribed an extract from a little piece, entitled, “Sayings and Doings, a Fragment of a Farce.” One of the personages of this farce is an English gentleman, a Captain Mandaville, and among many speeches of the same kind, I selected the following. Collins’s Ode is the subject of conversation.
I think I've mentioned before that no work of just entertainment has really succeeded so far, but a recent attempt of this kind has been made, and we can't say yet how well it has done. The editors are comedians from the Boston company, and it’s called “The American Comic Annual.” It features illustrations that are somewhat similar to, but definitely not in the spirit of, Cruikshank’s work. Among the amusing pieces in this lively volume are some sharp critiques aimed at us, especially about our complete inability to speak English properly. We really need to hire a few American professors, or we’ll lose all traces of classical purity in our language. As a sample, and a rather good one, I’ve transcribed an excerpt from a short piece titled, “Sayings and Doings, a Fragment of a Farce.” One of the characters in this farce is an English gentleman, Captain Mandaville, and out of many speeches like this one, I picked the following. Collins’s Ode is the topic of conversation.
“A—r, A—a—a it stroiks me that that you manetion his the hode about hangger and ope and orror and revenge you know. I’ve eard Mrs. Sitdowns hencored in it at Common Garden and Doory Lane in the ight of her poplarity you know. By the boye, hall the hactin in Amareka is werry orrid. You’re honely in the hinfancy of the istoryonic hart you know; your performers never haspirate the haitch in sich vords for instance as hink and hoats, and leave out the w in wice wanity you know; and make nothink of homittin the k in somethink.”
“A—r, A—a—a it strikes me that you mentioned his whole deal about anger and hope and horror and revenge, you know. I’ve heard Mrs. Sitdowns performed it at Covent Garden and Drury Lane during her peak popularity, you know. By the way, all the acting in America is really awful. You’re only in the infancy of the historical art, you know; your performers never aspirate the 'h' in words like ‘think’ and ‘boats,’ and leave out the w in ‘vice vanity,’ you know; and make nothing of omitting the k in ‘something.’”
There is much more in the same style, but, perhaps, this may suffice. I have given this passage chiefly because it affords an example of the manner in which the generality of Americans are accustomed to speak of English pronunciation and phraseology.
There’s a lot more in the same style, but this might be enough. I included this passage mainly because it shows how most Americans tend to talk about English pronunciation and phrasing.
It must be remembered, however, here and every where, that this phrase, “the Americans,” does not include the instructed and travelled portion of the community.
It should be kept in mind, though, here and everywhere, that this term, “the Americans,” does not include the educated and well-traveled part of the population.
It would be absurd to swell my little volumes with extracts in proof of the veracity of their contents, but having spoken of the taste of their lighter works, and also of the general tone of manners, I cannot forbear inserting a page from an American annual (The Token), which purports to give a scene from fashionable life. It is part of a dialogue between a young lady of the “highest standing” and her “tutor,” who is moreover her lover, though not yet acknowledged.
It would be ridiculous to fill my small books with quotes to prove their truth, but since I’ve mentioned the style of their lighter works and the overall tone of manners, I can’t help but include a page from an American annual (The Token), which claims to depict a scene from high society. It’s part of a conversation between a young lady of the “highest standing” and her “tutor,” who is also her lover, although that hasn’t been acknowledged yet.
“And so you wo’nt tell me,” said she, “what has come over you, and why you look as grave and sensible as a Dictionary, when, by general consent, even mine, ‘motley’s the only wear?’”
“And so you won't tell me,” she said, “what's gotten into you, and why you look so serious and sensible like a Dictionary, when, by everyone's agreement—even mine—'motley's the only way to go?'”
‘“Am I so grave, Miss Blair?”
‘“Am I really that serious, Miss Blair?”
‘“Are you so grave, Miss Blair? One would think I had not got my lesson today. Pray, sir, has the black ox trod upon your toe since we parted?”
“Are you so serious, Miss Blair? You'd think I didn't learn my lesson today. Please, sir, has the black ox stepped on your toe since we last met?”
‘Philip tried to laugh, but he did not succeed; he bit his lip and was silent.
‘Philip tried to laugh, but it didn't work; he bit his lip and stayed quiet.
‘“I am under orders to entertain you, Mr. Blondel, and if my poor brain can be made to gird this fairy isle, I shall certainly be obedient. So I begin with playing the leech. What ails you, sir?”
‘“I’ve been told to entertain you, Mr. Blondel, and if I can wrap my head around this magical island, I’ll definitely follow through. So I’ll start by playing the doctor. What’s bothering you, sir?”’
‘“Miss Blair!” he was going to remonstrate.
‘“Miss Blair!” he was about to protest.
‘“Miss Blair! Now, pity. I’m a quack! for whip me, if I know whether Miss Blair is a fever or an ague. How did you catch it, sir?”
‘“Miss Blair! Oh, come on. I’m just a fraud! Honestly, I can’t tell if Miss Blair has a fever or chills. How did you get it, sir?”’
‘“Really, Miss Blair—”
“Seriously, Miss Blair—”
‘“Nay, I see you don’t like doctoring; I give over, and now I’ll be sensible. It’s a fine day, Mr. Blondel.”
‘“No, I can see you’re not into doctoring; I give up, and now I’ll be reasonable. It’s a nice day, Mr. Blondel.”’
‘“Very.”
“Absolutely.”
‘“A pleasant lane, this, to walk in, if one’s company were agreeable.”
“A nice path to stroll on, if the company is good.”
‘“Does Mr. Skefton stay long?” asked Philip, abruptly.
“Is Mr. Skefton staying long?” Philip asked, suddenly.
‘“No one knows,”
"No one knows,"
‘“Indeed! are you so ignorant?”
"Seriously! Are you that clueless?"
‘“And why does your wisdom ask that question?”’
‘“And why does your wisdom ask that question?”’
In no society in the world can the advantage of travel be so conspicuous as in America, in other countries a tone of unpretending simplicity can more than compensate for the absence of enlarged views or accurate observation; but this tone is not to be found in America, or if it be, it is only among those who, having looked at that insignificant portion of the world not included in the Union, have learnt to know how much is still unknown within the mighty part which is. For the rest, they all declare, and do in truth believe, that they only, among the sons of men, have wit and wisdom, and that one of their exclusive privileges is that of speaking English elegantly. There are two reasons for this latter persuasion; the one is, that the great majority have never heard any English but their own, except from the very lowest of the Irish; and the other, that those who have chanced to find themselves in the society of the few educated English who have visited America, have discovered that there is a marked difference between their phrases and accents and those to which they have been accustomed, whereupon they have, of course, decided that no Englishman can speak English.
In no society in the world is the benefit of travel as obvious as it is in America. In other countries, a tone of unpretentious simplicity can more than make up for a lack of broad perspectives or keen observation. But this tone is absent in America, or if it exists, it’s only among those who, having looked at that small part of the world outside the Union, have come to realize how much is still unknown within the vast area that is part of it. For the rest, they all claim—and truly believe—that they alone, among humanity, possess wit and wisdom, and that one of their unique privileges is speaking English elegantly. There are two reasons for this belief: first, the vast majority have never heard any English other than their own, except from the very lowest levels of Irish accents; second, those who have interacted with the few educated English visitors to America have noticed a distinct difference between their phrases and accents and the ones they are used to, leading them to conclude that no Englishman can actually speak English.
The reviews of America contain some good clear-headed articles; but I sought in vain for the playful vivacity and the keenly-cutting satire, whose sharp edge, however painful to the patient, is of such high utility in lopping off the excrescences of bad taste, and levelling to its native clay the heavy growth of dulness. Still less could I find any trace of that graceful familiarity of learned allusion and general knowledge which mark the best European reviews, and which make one feel in such perfectly good company while perusing them. But this is a tone not to be found either in the writings or conversation of Americans; as distant from pedantry as from ignorance, it is not learning itself, but the effect of it; and so pervading and subtle is its influence that it may be traced in the festive halls and gay drawing-rooms of Europe as certainly as in the cloistered library or student’s closet; it is, perhaps, the last finish of highly-finished society.
The reviews of America have some clear and sensible articles, but I searched in vain for the playful liveliness and sharp satire that, although it may sting the sensitive, is really useful for cutting away the excesses of bad taste and leveling down the heavy growth of dullness. Even less could I find any hint of that charming familiarity with learned references and broad knowledge that characterizes the best European reviews, making you feel you're in great company while reading them. But this kind of tone is absent in both American writings and conversations; it's as far from pedantry as it is from ignorance—it's not the knowledge itself, but the effect of it. Its influence is so pervasive and subtle that you can see it in the lively halls and chic living rooms of Europe just as clearly as in the quiet library or student’s study; it may be the final touch of a highly refined society.
A late American Quarterly has an article on a work of Dr. Von Schmidt Phiseldek, from which I made an extract, as a curious sample of the dreams they love to batten on.
A recent issue of an American Quarterly features an article about a work by Dr. Von Schmidt Phiseldek, from which I took an excerpt, as an interesting example of the dreams they enjoy feeding on.
Dr. Von Phiseldek (not Fiddlestick), who is not only a doctor of philosophy, but a knight of Dannebrog to boot, has never been in America, but he has written a prophecy, showing that the United States must and will govern the whole world, because they are so very big, and have so much uncultivated territory; he prophesies that an union will take place between North and South America, which will give a death-blow to Europe, at no distant period; though he modestly adds that he does not pretend to designate the precise period at which this will take place. This Danish prophecy, as may be imagined, enchants the reviewer. He exhorts all people to read Dr. Phiseldek’s book, because “nothing but good can come of such contemplations of the future, and because it is eminently calculated to awaken the most lofty anticipations of the destiny which awaits them, and will serve to impress upon the nation the necessity of being prepared for such high destiny.” In another place the reviewer bursts out, “America, young as she is, has become already the beacon, the patriarch of the struggling nations of the world;” and afterwards adds, It would be departing from the natural order of things, and the ordinary operations of the great scheme of Providence, it would be shutting our ears to the voice of experience, and our eyes to the inevitable connexion of causes and their effects, were we to reject the extreme probability, not to say moral certainty, that the old world is destined to receive its influences in future from the new.” There are twenty pages of this article, but I will only give one passage more; it is an instance of the sort of reasoning by which American citizens persuade themselves that the glory of Europe is, in reality, her reproach. “Wrapped up in a sense of his superiority, the European reclines at home, shining in his borrowed plumes, derived from the product of every corner of the earth, and the industry of every portion of its inhabitants, with which his own natural resources would never have invested him, he continues revelling in enjoyments which nature has denied him.”
Dr. Von Phiseldek (not Fiddlestick), who holds a doctorate in philosophy and is also a knight of Dannebrog, has never been to America, but he has written a prophecy claiming that the United States must and will govern the entire world because it is so large and has so much untapped territory. He predicts that a union will form between North and South America, which will deliver a significant blow to Europe in the not-so-distant future; however, he modestly adds that he can’t specify exactly when this will happen. This Danish prophecy, as you can imagine, delights the reviewer. He encourages everyone to read Dr. Phiseldek’s book because “nothing but good can come from such reflections on the future, and it is sure to inspire the highest expectations of the destiny that awaits them, and will impress upon the nation the need to be ready for such a great destiny.” In another part, the reviewer exclaims, “America, as young as she is, has already become the beacon, the leader of the struggling nations of the world;” and later adds, “It would be a departure from the natural order of things and the usual workings of the grand plan of Providence; it would be ignoring the wisdom of experience, and the undeniable link between causes and effects, if we were to dismiss the strong likelihood, if not moral certainty, that the old world is destined to receive future influences from the new.” There are twenty pages in this article, but I’ll only share one more excerpt; it demonstrates the kind of reasoning that leads American citizens to convince themselves that Europe’s glory is, in fact, her shame. “Caught up in his sense of superiority, the European relaxes at home, basking in his borrowed prestige, sourced from the products of every corner of the globe and the labor of its inhabitants, all of which his own natural resources would never have provided him, and he continues to indulge in luxuries that nature has denied him.”
The American Quarterly deservedly holds the highest place in their periodical literature, and, therefore, may be fairly quoted as striking the keynote for the chorus of public opinion. Surely it is nationality rather than patriotism which leads it thus to speak in scorn of the successful efforts of enlightened nations to win from every corner of the earth the riches which nature has scattered over it.
The American Quarterly rightfully occupies the top spot in periodical literature, so it can be justifiably quoted as setting the tone for public opinion. It's clear that it's a sense of nationality, rather than just patriotism, that drives it to criticize the successful attempts of progressive nations to gather the resources that nature has distributed across the globe.
The incorrectness of the press is very great; they make strange work in the reprints of French and Italian; and the Latin, I suspect, does not fare much better: I believe they do not often meddle with Greek.
The press is quite inaccurate; they really mess up the reprints of French and Italian, and I suspect Latin doesn't fare much better. I don't think they deal with Greek very often.
With regard to the fine arts, their paintings, I think, are quite as good, or rather better, than might be expected from the patronage they receive; the wonder is that any man can be found with courage enough to devote himself to a profession in which he has so little chance of finding a maintenance. The trade of a carpenter opens an infinitely better prospect; and this is so well known, that nothing but a genuine passion for the art could beguile any one to pursue it. The entire absence of every means of improvement, and effectual study, is unquestionably the cause why those who manifest this devotion cannot advance farther. I heard of one young artist, whose circumstances did not permit his going to Europe, but who being nevertheless determined that his studies should, as nearly as possible, resemble those of the European academies, was about to commence drawing the human figure, for which purpose he had provided himself with a thin silk dress, in which to clothe his models, as no one of any station, he said, could be found who would submit to sit as a model without clothing.
When it comes to the fine arts, I think their paintings are just as good, or even better, than what you'd expect based on the support they get; it's surprising that anyone would have the guts to commit to a profession where it's so hard to make a living. Being a carpenter offers a much better future; it's so well-known that only a true passion for the art could entice someone to chase after it. The complete lack of resources for improvement and serious study is definitely why those who are dedicated can’t make more progress. I heard about a young artist whose situation didn't allow him to go to Europe, but he was still determined to make his studies as similar as possible to those at European academies. He was about to start drawing the human figure and had gotten a thin silk dress to use for his models, since he said no one of any social standing would agree to pose without any clothes.
It was at Alexandria that I saw what I consider as the best picture by an American artist that I met with. The subject was Hagar and Ishmael. It had recently arrived from Rome, where the painter, a young man of the name of Chapman, had been studying for three years. His mother told me that he was twenty-two years of age, and passionately devoted to the art; should he, on returning to his country, receive sufficient encouragement to keep his ardour and his industry alive, I think I shall hear of him again.
It was in Alexandria that I saw what I believe is the best painting by an American artist I've come across. The subject was Hagar and Ishmael. It had just come in from Rome, where the painter, a young guy named Chapman, had been studying for three years. His mother told me he was twenty-two years old and deeply passionate about art; if he gets enough support when he returns to his country to maintain his enthusiasm and hard work, I think I'll hear about him again.
Much is said about the universal diffusion of education in America, and a vast deal of genuine admiration is felt and expressed at the progress of mind throughout the Union. They believe themselves in all sincerity to have surpassed, to be surpassing, and to be about to surpass, the whole earth in the intellectual race. I am aware that not a single word can be said, hinting a different opinion, which will not bring down a transatlantic anathema on my head; yet the subject is too interesting to be omitted. Before I left England I remember listening, with much admiration, to an eloquent friend, who deprecated our system of public education, as confining the various and excursive faculties of our children to one beaten path, paying little or no attention to the peculiar powers of the individual.
Much is said about the widespread availability of education in America, and there’s a lot of genuine admiration for the intellectual growth across the country. They sincerely believe they have outperformed, are outperforming, and are about to outshine the rest of the world in the race for knowledge. I know that just saying anything to the contrary will earn me criticism from overseas; however, the topic is too important to ignore. Before I left England, I remember listening with great admiration to an articulate friend who criticized our public education system for restricting the diverse abilities of our children to a single, common path, giving little or no regard to their individual strengths.
This objection is extremely plausible, but doubts of its intrinsic value must, I think, occur to every one who has marked the result of a different system throughout the United States.
This objection makes a lot of sense, but I believe anyone who has observed the outcomes of a different system across the United States will have doubts about its true value.
From every enquiry I could make, and I took much pains to obtain accurate information, it appeared that much is attempted, but very little beyond reading, writing, and bookkeeping, is thoroughly acquired. Were we to read a prospectus of the system pursued in any of our public schools and that of a first-rate seminary in America, we should be struck by the confined scholastic routine of the former, when compared to the varied and expansive scope of the latter; but let the examination go a little farther, and I believe it will be found that the old fashioned school discipline of England has produced something higher, and deeper too, than that which roars so loud, and thunders in the index.
From every inquiry I could make, and I worked hard to get accurate information, it seemed that a lot is attempted, but very little beyond reading, writing, and bookkeeping is really mastered. If we were to read a prospectus of the system used in any of our public schools and compare it to that of a first-rate school in America, we would be struck by how limited the learning routine is in the former compared to the varied and broad approach of the latter; however, if we dig a little deeper, I believe we’ll find that the traditional school discipline of England has produced something greater and deeper than what is so loud and prominent in the index.
They will not afford to let their young men study till two or three and twenty, and it is therefore declared, ex cathedra Americana, to be unnecessary. At sixteen, often much earlier, education ends, and money-making begins; the idea that more learning is necessary than can be acquired by that time, is generally ridiculed as obsolete monkish bigotry; added to which, if the seniors willed a more prolonged discipline, the juniors would refuse submission. When the money-getting begins, leisure ceases, and all of lore which can be acquired afterwards, is picked up from novels, magazines, and newspapers.
They can’t afford to let their young men study until they’re two or three and twenty, so it’s officially stated, ex cathedra Americana, that it’s unnecessary. Education usually ends at sixteen, often even earlier, and then money-making starts; the idea that more learning is needed than what can be gained by that time is generally mocked as outdated and narrow-minded. Additionally, if the older generation wanted to extend education, the younger generation would refuse to comply. Once work starts, free time disappears, and any knowledge gained afterwards usually comes from novels, magazines, and newspapers.
At what time can the taste be formed? How can a correct and polished style, even of speaking, be acquired? or when can the fruit of the two thousand years of past thinking be added to the native growth of American intellect? These are the tools, if I may so express myself, which our elaborate system of school discipline puts into the hands of our scholars; possessed of these, they may use them in whatever direction they please afterwards, they can never be an incumbrance.
At what point can taste be developed? How can one acquire a refined and elegant style of speaking? When can the insights from two thousand years of past thought be combined with the natural abilities of American intellect? These are the tools, if I may say so, that our comprehensive education system provides to our students; once they have these tools, they can use them in any direction they choose later on, and they will never be a burden.
No people appear more anxious to excite admiration and receive applause than the Americans, yet none take so little trouble, or make so few sacrifices to obtain it. This may answer among themselves, but it will not with the rest of the world; individual sacrifices must be made, and national economy enlarged, before America can compete with the old world in taste, learning, and liberality.
No group seems more eager to gain admiration and receive applause than Americans, yet none put in so little effort or make so few sacrifices to achieve it. This might work among themselves, but it won’t with the rest of the world; individuals must make sacrifices, and national resources need to be expanded before America can compete with the old world in style, education, and generosity.
The reception of General Lafayette is the one single instance in which the national pride has overcome the national thrift; and this was clearly referrible to the one single feeling of enthusiasm of which they appear capable, namely, the triumph of their successful struggle for national independence. But though this feeling will be universally acknowledged as a worthy and lawful source of triumph and of pride, it will not serve to trade upon for ever, as a fund of glory and high station among the nations. Their fathers were colonists; they fought stoutly, and became an independent people. Success and admiration, even the admiration of those whose yoke they had broken, cheered them while living, still sheds a glory round their remote and untitled sepulchres, and will illumine the page of their history for ever.
The reception of General Lafayette is the one instance where national pride has overcome frugality; this clearly comes from the single feeling of enthusiasm they seem capable of, which is the triumph of their successful struggle for independence. While this feeling will be widely recognized as a worthy and legitimate source of pride, it won't be something they can rely on indefinitely as a source of glory and status among nations. Their ancestors were colonists; they fought hard and became an independent people. Their success and the admiration from those they had freed themselves from uplifted them during their lives, continue to cast a glow around their distant and unmarked graves, and will forever light up the pages of their history.
Their children inherit the independence; they inherit too the honour of being the sons of brave fathers; but this will not give them the reputation at which they aim, of being scholars and gentlemen, nor will it enable them to sit down for evermore to talk of their glory, while they drink mint julap and chew tobacco, swearing by the beard of Jupiter (or some other oath) that they are very graceful, and agreeable, and, moreover abusing every body who does not cry out Amen!
Their children inherit independence and the honor of being the sons of brave fathers; however, this won’t earn them the reputation they seek as scholars and gentlemen. It won’t allow them to sit around forever discussing their glory while sipping mint juleps and chewing tobacco, swearing by the beard of Jupiter (or some other oath) that they are charming and pleasant, while also criticizing everyone who doesn’t agree with them!
To doubt that talent and mental power of every kind exist in America would be absurd; why should it not? But in taste and learning they are woefully deficient; and it is this which renders them incapable of graduating a scale by which to measure themselves. Hence arises that over weening complacency and self-esteem, both national and individual, which at once renders them so extremely obnoxious to ridicule, and so peculiarly restive under it.
To doubt that there is talent and intelligence of all kinds in America would be ridiculous; why wouldn’t there be? However, in terms of taste and education, they are severely lacking; and this is what makes them unable to create a standard to evaluate themselves. This leads to the excessive pride and self-confidence, both on a national and individual level, which makes them highly susceptible to mockery, and particularly sensitive to it.
If they will scorn the process by which other nations have become what they avowedly intend to be, they must rest satisfied with the praise and admiration they receive from each other; and turning a deaf ear to the criticism of the old world, consent to be their own prodigious great reward.”
If they disregard the journey that other nations took to become what they claim they want to be, they can only find contentment in the praise and admiration they give one another; by ignoring the criticism from the old world, they agree to be their own immense reward.
Alexandria has its churches, chapels, and conventicles as abundantly, in proportion to its size, as any city in the Union. I visited most of them, and in the Episcopal and Catholic heard the services performed quietly and reverently.
Alexandria has its churches, chapels, and meeting places as plentifully, relative to its size, as any city in the country. I visited most of them, and in the Episcopal and Catholic ones, I heard the services conducted quietly and respectfully.
The best sermon, however, that I listened to, was in a Methodist church, from the mouth of a Piquot Indian. It was impossible not be touched by the simple sincerity of this poor man. He gave a picture frightfully eloquent of the decay of his people under the united influence of the avarice and intemperance of the white men. He described the effect of the religious feeling which had recently found its way among them as most salutary. The purity of his moral feeling, and the sincerity of his sympathy with his forest brethren, made it unquestionable that he must be the most valuable priest who could officiate for them. His English was very correct, and his pronunciation but slightly tinctured by native accent.
The best sermon I heard was in a Methodist church, delivered by a Piquot Indian. It was impossible not to be moved by the genuine sincerity of this man. He painted a heartbreaking picture of the decline of his people due to the greed and excess of white men. He described the impact of the religious feelings that had recently emerged among them as very beneficial. His moral integrity and deep empathy for his fellow tribesmen made it clear that he would be the most valuable priest to serve them. His English was quite good, and his accent only slightly reflected his native language.
While we were still in the neighbourhood of Washington, a most violent and unprecedented schism occurred in the cabinet. The four secretaries of State all resigned, leaving General Jackson to manage the queer little state barge alone.
While we were still in the Washington area, a very intense and unprecedented split happened in the cabinet. All four secretaries of State resigned, leaving General Jackson to handle the odd little state boat by himself.
Innumerable contradictory statements appeared upon this occasion in the papers, and many a cigar was thrown aside, ere half consumed, that the disinterested politician might give breath to his cogitations on this extraordinary event; but not all the eloquence of all the smokers, nor even the ultradiplomatic expositions which appeared from the seceding secretaries themselves, could throw any light on the mysterious business. It produced, however, the only tolerable caricature I ever saw in the country. It represents the President seated alone in his cabinet, wearing a look of much discomfiture, and making great exertions to detain one of four rats, who are running off, by placing his foot on the tail. The rats’ heads bear a very sufficient resemblance to the four ex-ministers. General Jackson, it seems, had requested Mr. Van Buren, the Secretary of State, to remain in office till his place was supplied; this gave occasion to a bon mot from his son, who, being asked when his father would be in New York, replied, “When the President takes off his foot.”
Numerous contradictory statements filled the newspapers at this time, and many a cigar was tossed aside before it was halfway done so that the concerned politician could share his thoughts on this unusual event. However, not all the speeches from smokers, nor even the overly diplomatic explanations from the resigning secretaries themselves, could clarify the puzzling situation. It did produce the only decent caricature I ever saw in the country. It shows the President sitting alone in his office, looking quite uncomfortable as he struggles to catch one of four rats trying to escape by stepping on its tail. The rats’ heads closely resemble the four former ministers. General Jackson had asked Mr. Van Buren, the Secretary of State, to stay on until someone else was appointed, which inspired a clever remark from his son. When asked when his father would be in New York, he replied, “When the President takes his foot off.”
CHAPTER XXX
Journey to New York—Delaware River—Stagecoach—City of New York—Collegiate Institute for Young Ladies—Theatres—Public Garden—Churches—Morris Canal—Fashions—Carriages
Journey to New York—Delaware River—Stagecoach—City of New York—Collegiate Institute for Young Ladies—Theatres—Public Garden—Churches—Morris Canal—Fashions—Carriages
At length, in spite of the lingering pace necessarily attending consultations, and arrangements across the Atlantic, our plans were finally settled; the coming spring was to show us New York, and Niagara, and the early summer was to convey us home.
At last, despite the slow pace that comes with discussions and arrangements across the Atlantic, our plans were finally made; the upcoming spring would bring us to New York and Niagara, and early summer would take us back home.
No sooner did the letter arrive which decided this, than we began our preparations for departure. We took our last voyage on the Potomac, we bade a last farewell to Virginia, and gave a last day to some of our kind friends near Washington.
No sooner did the letter arrive that made this decision than we started getting ready to leave. We took our final trip on the Potomac, said goodbye to Virginia for the last time, and spent one last day with some of our kind friends near Washington.
The spring, though slow and backward, was sufficiently advanced to render the journey pleasant; and though the road from Washington to Baltimore was less brilliant in foliage than when I had seen it before, it still had much of beauty. The azalias were in full bloom, and the delicate yellow blossom of the sassafras almost rivalled its fruit in beauty.
The spring, despite being slow and a bit behind, had progressed enough to make the trip enjoyable; and while the road from Washington to Baltimore wasn’t as vibrant with leaves as I had remembered, it still held a lot of beauty. The azaleas were fully blossomed, and the delicate yellow flowers of the sassafras almost matched the beauty of its fruit.
At Baltimore we again embarked on a gigantic steam-boat, and reached Philadelphia in the middle of the night. Here we changed our boat and found time, before starting in the morning, to take a last look at the Doric and Corinthian porticos of the two celebrated temples dedicated to Mammon.
At Baltimore, we boarded a massive steamboat again and arrived in Philadelphia in the middle of the night. Here, we switched boats and had time before leaving in the morning to take one last look at the Doric and Corinthian porticos of the two famous temples dedicated to Mammon.
The Delaware river, above Philadelphia, still flows through a landscape too level for beauty, but it is rendered interesting by a succession of gentlemen’s seats, which, if less elaborately finished in architecture, and garden grounds, than the lovely villas on the Thames, are still beautiful objects to gaze upon as you float rapidly past on the broad silvery stream that washes their lawns They present a picture of wealth and enjoyment that accords well with the noble city to which they are an appendage. One mansion arrested our attention, not only from its being more than usually large and splendid, but from its having the monument which marked the family resting-place, rearing itself in all the gloomy grandeur of black and white marble, exactly opposite the door of entrance.
The Delaware River, just north of Philadelphia, still flows through a landscape that's too flat to be beautiful, but it's made interesting by a series of elegant homes. While they may not be as intricately designed in architecture or gardens as the lovely villas along the Thames, they are still lovely sights to see as you float swiftly by on the wide, silvery stream that washes their lawns. They present a scene of wealth and enjoyment that fits perfectly with the grand city they’re part of. One mansion caught our eye, not only because it was unusually large and magnificent, but also because it had a monument marking the family’s resting place, standing in all its gloomy grandeur of black and white marble, directly across from the entrance.
In Virginia and Maryland we had remarked that almost every family mansion had its little grave yard, sheltered by locust and cypress trees; but this decorated dwelling of the dead seemed rather a melancholy ornament in the grounds.
In Virginia and Maryland, we noticed that nearly every family home had its small graveyard, shaded by locust and cypress trees; however, this adorned resting place for the dead felt more like a gloomy decoration in the yards.
We had, for a considerable distance, a view of the dwelling of Joseph Bonaparte, which is situated on the New Jersey shore, in the midst of an extensive tract of land, of which he is the proprietor.
We had a clear view for quite a long way of Joseph Bonaparte's house, which is located on the New Jersey shore, in the middle of a large piece of land that he owns.
Here the ex-monarch has built several houses, which are occupied by French tenants. The country is very flat, but a terrace of two sides has been raised, commanding a fine reach of the Delaware River; at the point where this terrace forms a right angle, a lofty chapel has been erected, which looks very much like an observatory; I admired the ingenuity with which the Catholic prince has united his religion and his love of a fine terrestrial prospect. The highest part of the building presents, in every direction, the appearance of an immense cross; the transept, if I may so express it, being formed by the projection of an ample balcony, which surrounds a tower. A Quaker gentleman, from Philadelphia, exclaimed, as he gazed on the mansion, “There we see a monument of fallen royalty! Strange! that dethroned kings should seek and find their best strong-hold in a Republic.”
Here the former king has built several houses, which are occupied by French tenants. The area is quite flat, but a two-sided terrace has been raised, offering a great view of the Delaware River; at the point where this terrace makes a right angle, a tall chapel has been constructed, resembling an observatory. I admired the clever way the Catholic prince has combined his faith with his love for a beautiful view. The highest part of the building looks like a huge cross from every direction; the crossbar, if I can put it that way, is created by a large balcony that wraps around a tower. A Quaker gentleman from Philadelphia remarked, as he looked at the mansion, “There we see a monument of fallen royalty! Strange that dethroned kings should seek and find their safest refuge in a Republic.”
There was more of philosophy than of scorn in his accent, and his countenance was the symbol of gentleness and benevolence; but I overheard many unquakerlike jokes from others, as to the comfortable assurance a would-be king must feel of a faithful alliance between his head and shoulders.
There was more philosophy than scorn in his tone, and his expression was a sign of kindness and goodwill; however, I heard many un-Quakerly jokes from others about how comfortably confident a would-be king must feel about the loyalty between his head and shoulders.
At Trenton, the capital of New Jersey, we left our smoothly-gliding comfortable boat for the most detestable stage-coach that ever Christian built to dislocate the joints of his fellow men. Ten of these torturing machines were crammed full of the passengers who left the boat with us. The change in our movement was not more remarkable than that which took place in the tempers and countenances of our fellow-travellers. Gentlemen who had lounged on sofas, and balanced themselves in chairs, all the way from Philadelphia, with all the conscious fascinations of stiff stays and neck-cloths, which, while doing to death the rash beauties who ventured to gaze, seemed but a whalebone panoply to guard the wearer, these pretty youths so guarded from without, so sweetly at peace within, now crushed beneath their armour, looked more like victims on the wheel, than dandies armed for conquest; their whalebones seemed to enter into their souls, and every face grew grim and scowling. The pretty ladies too, with their expansive bonnets, any one of which might handsomely have filled the space allotted to three,—how sad the change! I almost fancied they must have been of the race of Undine, and that it was only when they heard the splashing of water that they could smile. As I looked into the altered eyes of my companions, I was tempted to ask, “Look I as cross as you?” Indeed, I believe that, if possible, I looked crosser still, for the roads and the vehicle together were quite too much for my philosophy.
At Trenton, the capital of New Jersey, we got off our smoothly gliding, comfortable boat and boarded the most awful stagecoach ever designed to torture its passengers. Ten of these miserable contraptions were crammed full of the other travelers who had disembarked with us. The shift in our mode of transport was matched only by the change in the attitudes and expressions of our fellow travelers. Gentlemen who had lounged on sofas and balanced themselves in chairs all the way from Philadelphia, proudly sporting their stiff stays and neckties—which seemed to smother the daring beauties who dared to look—now, under the weight of their fancy attire, resembled victims of a torture device rather than stylish men ready to impress; their stiff garments seemed to seep into their very beings, and every face looked grim and frowning. The lovely ladies too, with their wide bonnets, any one of which could have easily fit the space meant for three—how sad the transformation! I almost thought they might be water nymphs, only able to smile when they heard the sound of splashing water. As I gazed into the changed expressions of my companions, I was tempted to ask, “Do I look as grumpy as you?” In fact, I believe I looked even grumpier, as the roads and the vehicle combined were just too much for my patience.
At length, however, we found ourselves alive on board the boat which was to convey us down the Raraton River to New York.
At last, we found ourselves safely on the boat that would take us down the Raraton River to New York.
We fully intended to have gone to bed, to heal our bones, on entering the steam-boat, but the sight of a table neatly spread determined us to go to dinner instead. Sin and shame would it have been, indeed, to have closed our eyes upon the scene which soon opened before us. I have never seen the bay of Naples, I can therefore make no comparison, but my imagination is incapable of conceiving any thing of the kind more beautiful than the harbour of New York. Various and lovely are the objects which meet the eye on every side, but the naming them would only be to give a list of words, without conveying the faintest idea of the scene. I doubt if ever the pencil of Turner could do it justice, bright and glorious as it rose upon us. We seemed to enter the harbour of New York upon waves of liquid gold, and as we darted past the green isles which rise from its bosom, like guardian centinels of the fair city, the setting sun stretched his horizontal beams farther and farther at each moment, as if to point out to us some new glory in the landscape.
We planned to go to bed to rest our tired bodies as soon as we got on the steamboat, but the sight of a neatly set table convinced us to go for dinner instead. It would have been a sin and a shame to close our eyes on the scene that soon unfolded before us. I've never seen the bay of Naples, so I can't compare, but my imagination can't conceive of anything more beautiful than the harbor of New York. There are so many lovely things to see all around, but just naming them would only give a list of words without capturing the essence of the scene. I doubt even Turner's brush could do it justice, bright and glorious as it appeared to us. It felt like we were entering New York's harbor on waves of liquid gold, and as we zoomed past the green islands rising from its waters like guardians of the beautiful city, the setting sun stretched its rays farther and farther at each moment, as if to reveal some new beauty in the landscape.
New York, indeed, appeared to us, even when we saw it by a soberer light, a lovely and a noble city. To us who had been so long travelling through half-cleared forests, and sojourning among an “I’m-as-good-as-you” population, it seemed, perhaps, more beautiful, more splendid, and more refined than it might have done, had we arrived there directly from London; but making every allowance for this, I must still declare that I think New York one of the finest cities I ever saw, and as much superior to every other in the Union (Philadelphia not excepted), as London to Liverpool, or Paris to Rouen. Its advantages of position are, perhaps, unequalled any where. Situated on an island, which I think it will one day cover, it rises, like Venice, from the sea, and like that fairest of cities in the days of her glory, receives into its lap tribute of all the riches of the earth.
New York really seemed to us, even when we saw it in a more realistic light, a beautiful and impressive city. For us, after traveling through half-cleared forests and staying among a “I’m-as-good-as-you” crowd, it felt even more stunning, grand, and sophisticated than it might have if we had come straight from London. But even accounting for that, I still have to say that I believe New York is one of the finest cities I’ve ever seen, and it's way better than any other in the country (not even Philadelphia compares), just like London is to Liverpool, or Paris to Rouen. Its location is perhaps unmatched anywhere. Located on an island, which I think will one day be fully developed, it rises, like Venice, from the sea, and like that beautiful city in its prime, gathers all the wealth of the world into its embrace.
The southern point of Manhatten Island divides the waters of the harbour into the north and east rivers; on this point stands the city of New York, extending from river to river, and running northward to the extent of three or four miles. I think it covers nearly as much ground as Paris, but is much less thickly peopled. The extreme point is fortified towards the sea by a battery, and forms an admirable point of defence; I should suppose, no city could boast. From hence commences the splendid Broadway, as the fine avenue is called, which runs through the whole city. This noble street may vie with any I ever saw, for its length and breadth, its handsome shops, neat awnings, excellent trottoir, and well-dressed pedestrians. It has not the crowded glitter of Bond Street equipages, nor the gorgeous fronted palaces of Regent Street; but it is magnificent in its extent, and ornamented by several handsome buildings, some of them surrounded by grass and trees. The Park, in which stands the noble city-hall, is a very fine area, I never found that the most graphic description of a city could give me any feeling of being there; and even if others have the power, I am very sure I have not, of setting churches and squares, and long drawn streets, before the mind’s eye. I will not, therefore, attempt a detailed description of this great metropolis of the new world, but will only say that during the seven weeks we stayed there, we always found something new to see and to admire; and were it not so very far from all the old-world things which cling about the heart of an European, I should say that I never saw a city more desirable as a residence.
The southern tip of Manhattan Island divides the waters of the harbor into the North and East Rivers; on this tip stands the city of New York, stretching from river to river and extending northward for about three or four miles. I think it covers nearly as much area as Paris, but is much less densely populated. The very tip is protected toward the sea by a battery and forms an impressive defense point, something that I doubt any city can match. From here begins the famous Broadway, as this grand avenue is called, which runs through the entire city. This magnificent street can compete with any I’ve ever seen, for its length and width, its stylish shops, neat awnings, excellent sidewalks, and well-dressed pedestrians. It doesn't have the crowded glamour of the carriages on Bond Street or the stunningly fronted palaces of Regent Street; but it is magnificent in its scale, adorned with several beautiful buildings, some surrounded by grass and trees. The Park, which houses the impressive City Hall, is a very nice area. I’ve never found that even the most vivid description of a city could give me a sense of being there; and even if others have that ability, I’m sure I don’t, to visualize churches, squares, and long streets in my mind. Therefore, I won't attempt a detailed description of this great metropolis of the New World, but I will say that during the seven weeks we stayed there, we always found something new to see and appreciate; and if it weren’t so far from all the old-world things that tug at the heart of a European, I would say that I’ve never seen a city more desirable to live in.
The dwelling houses of the higher classes are extremely handsome, and very richly furnished. Silk or satin furniture is as often, or oftener, seen than chintz; the mirrors are as handsome as in London; the cheffoniers, slabs, and marble tables as elegant; and in addition, they have all the pretty tasteful decoration of French porcelaine, and or-molu in much greater abundance, because at a much cheaper rate. Every part of their houses is well carpeted, and the exterior finishing, such as steps, railings, and door-frames, are very superior. Almost every house has handsome green blinds on the outside; balconies are not very general, nor do the houses display, externally, so many flowers as those of Paris and London; but I saw many rooms decorated within, exactly like those of an European petite maitresse. Little tables, looking and smelling like flower beds, portfolios, nick-nacks, bronzes, busts, cameos, and alabaster vases, illustrated copies of ladylike rhymes bound in silk, and, in short, all the pretty coxcomalities of the drawing-room scattered about with the same profuse and studied negligence as with us.
The homes of the upper class are really beautiful and very elegantly furnished. Silk or satin furniture is just as common, if not more so, than chintz; the mirrors are as stunning as those in London; the cabinets, tabletops, and marble tables are equally stylish; plus, they have all the lovely, tasteful decorations of French porcelain and ormolu in much greater quantity, thanks to lower prices. Every part of their homes is well carpeted, and the finishing touches outside, like steps, railings, and door frames, are very high quality. Almost every house has attractive green blinds on the outside; balconies are not very common, nor do the houses display as many flowers outside as those in Paris and London; however, I saw many rooms decorated inside, just like those of a European petite maitresse. Little tables, looking and smelling like flower beds, portfolios, trinkets, bronzes, busts, cameos, and alabaster vases, illustrated copies of feminine poems bound in silk, and, in short, all the charming little details of the drawing room scattered about with the same lavish and intentional carelessness as in our homes.
Hudson Square and its neighbourhood is, I believe, the most fashionable part of the town; the square is beautiful, excellently well planted with a great variety of trees, and only wanting our frequent and careful mowing to make it equal to any square in London. The iron railing which surrounds this enclosure is as high and as handsome as that of the Tuilleries, and it will give some idea of the care bestowed on its decoration, to know that the gravel for the walks was conveyed by barges from Boston, not as ballast, but as freight.
Hudson Square and its neighborhood is, in my opinion, the most stylish part of the city. The square is beautiful, perfectly landscaped with a wide variety of trees, and just needs our regular and thorough mowing to rival any square in London. The iron railing that surrounds this area is as tall and attractive as that of the Tuileries, and to give you an idea of the care put into its design, the gravel for the paths was transported by barges from Boston, not as ballast, but as cargo.
The great defect in the houses is their extreme uniformity when you have seen one, you have seen all. Neither do I quite like the arrangement of the rooms. In nearly all the houses the dining and drawing rooms are on the same floor, with ample folding doors between them; when thrown together they certainly make a very noble apartment; but no doors can be barrier sufficient between dining and drawing-rooms. Mixed dinner parties of ladies and gentlemen, however, are very rare, which is a great defect in the society; not only as depriving them of the most social and hospitable manner of meeting, but as leading to frequent dinner parties of gentlemen without ladies, which certainly does not conduce to refinement.
The main issue with the houses is their extreme uniformity; once you've seen one, you've seen them all. I'm also not a fan of how the rooms are arranged. In almost all the houses, the dining and drawing rooms are on the same floor, with large folding doors between them; when opened, they create a really impressive space. But no door can truly separate dining from drawing rooms. Mixed dinner parties of women and men are quite rare, which is a significant flaw in the social scene. This not only takes away the most social and welcoming way of gathering, but it also leads to frequent dinner parties with just men, which definitely doesn't promote refinement.
The evening parties, excepting such as are expressly for young people, are chiefly conversational; we were too late in the season for large parties, but we saw enough to convince us that there is society to be met with in New York, which would be deemed delightful any where. Cards are very seldom used; and music, from their having very little professional aid at their parties is seldom, I believe, as good as what is heard at private concerts in London.
The evening parties, except for those specifically for young people, are mostly about conversation; we were too late in the season for big gatherings, but we saw enough to assure us that there is a social scene in New York that would be considered delightful anywhere. Card games are rarely played, and the music, due to the lack of professional help at their parties, is, I believe, not as good as what you hear at private concerts in London.
The Americans have certainly not the same besoin of being amused, as other people; they may be the wiser for this, perhaps, but it makes them less agreeable to a looker-on.
The Americans definitely don't have the same need to be entertained as other people; they might be better off for it, but it makes them less pleasant to observe.
There are three theatres at New York, all of which we visited. The Park Theatre is the only one licensed by fashion, but the Bowery is infinitely superior in beauty; it is indeed as pretty a theatre as I ever entered, perfect as to size and proportion, elegantly decorated, and the scenery and machinery equal to any in London, but it is not the fashion. The Chatham is so utterly condemned by bon ton, that it requires some courage to decide upon going there; nor do I think my curiosity would have penetrated so far, had I not seen Miss Mitford’s Rienzi advertised there. It was the first opportunity I had had of seeing it played, and spite of very indifferent acting, I was delighted. The interest must have been great, for till the curtain fell, I saw not one quarter of the queer things around me: then I observed in the front row of a dress-box a lady performing the most maternal office possible; several gentlemen without their coats, and a general air of contempt for the decencies of life, certainly more than usually revolting.
There are three theaters in New York, and we visited all of them. The Park Theatre is the only one that's fashionable, but the Bowery is way better in terms of beauty; it's truly one of the prettiest theaters I've ever been to—just the right size and proportions, elegantly decorated, and with scenery and machinery equal to any in London, but it's not in style. The Chatham is so completely frowned upon by high society that it takes some guts to decide to go there; honestly, I don't think I would have gone if I hadn't seen Miss Mitford’s *Rienzi* advertised. It was my first chance to see it performed, and despite the pretty bad acting, I was thrilled. The interest was undeniable because until the curtain fell, I barely noticed any of the bizarre things around me: then I noticed a lady in the front row of a box doing the most maternal thing possible; several gentlemen without their coats, and an overall disrespect for basic decency, definitely more disturbing than usual.
At the Park Theatre I again saw the American Roscius, Mr. Forrest. He played the part of Damon, and roared, I thought, very unlike a nightingale. I cannot admire this celebrated performer.
At the Park Theatre, I saw the American Roscius, Mr. Forrest, again. He played the role of Damon and, in my opinion, roared much more like a lion than a nightingale. I can't bring myself to admire this famous performer.
Another night we saw Cinderella there; Mrs. Austin was the prima donna, and much admired. The piece was extremely well got up, and on this occasion we saw the Park Theatre to advantage, for it was filled with well-dressed company; but still we saw many “yet unrazored lips” polluted with the grim tinge of the hateful tobacco, and heard, without ceasing, the spitting, which of course is its consequence. If their theatres had the orchestra of the Feydeau, and a choir of angels to boot, I could find but little pleasure, so long as they were followed by this running accompaniment of thorough base.
Another night, we saw Cinderella there; Mrs. Austin was the lead actress and received a lot of admiration. The production was extremely well done, and this time we got to appreciate the Park Theatre, as it was filled with well-dressed people. However, we still noticed many “yet unshaven lips” stained with the unpleasant color of tobacco, and we constantly heard the spitting, which, of course, is its consequence. Even if their theatres had the orchestra of Feydeau and a choir of angels as well, I could hardly enjoy it as long as it was accompanied by this ongoing background noise of thorough base.
Whilst at New York, the prospectus of a fashionable boarding-school was presented to me. I made some extracts from it, as a specimen of the enlarged scale of instruction proposed for young females.
While in New York, I was given information about a trendy boarding school. I took some notes from it as an example of the expanded educational opportunities offered to young women.
Brooklyn Collegiate Institute
for Young Ladies,
Brooklyn Heights, opposite the City of
New York.
Brooklyn Collegiate Institute
for Young Ladies,
Brooklyn Heights, across from the City of
New York.
JUNIOR DEPARTMENT
Junior Dept.
Sixth Class
Sixth Grade
Latin Grammar, Liber Primus; Jacob’s Latin Reader, (first part); Modern Geography; Intellectual and Practical Arithmetic finished; Dr. Barber’s Grammar of Elocution; Writing, Spelling, Composition, and Vocal Music.
Latin Grammar, Book One; Jacob’s Latin Reader, (first part); Modern Geography; Intellectual and Practical Arithmetic completed; Dr. Barber’s Grammar of Elocution; Writing, Spelling, Composition, and Vocal Music.
Fifth Class
Fifth Grade
Jacob’s Latin Reader, (second part); Roman Antiquities, Sallust; Clark’s Introduction to the Making of Latin; Ancient and Sacred Geography; Studies of Poetry; Short Treatise on Rhetoric; Map Drawing, Composition, Spelling, and Vocal Music.
Jacob’s Latin Reader, (second part); Roman Antiquities, Sallust; Clark’s Introduction to the Making of Latin; Ancient and Sacred Geography; Studies of Poetry; Short Treatise on Rhetoric; Map Drawing, Composition, Spelling, and Vocal Music.
Fourth Class
Fourth Grade
Caesar’s Commentaries; first five books of Virgil’s Aeneid; Mythology; Watts on the Mind; Political Geography, (Woodbridge’s large work); Natural History; Treatise on the Globes; Ancient History; Studies of Poetry concluded; English Grammar, Composition, Spelling, and Vocal Music.
Caesar’s Commentaries; the first five books of Virgil’s Aeneid; Mythology; Watts on the Mind; Political Geography (Woodbridge’s comprehensive work); Natural History; Treatise on the Globes; Ancient History; Studies of Poetry completed; English Grammar, Composition, Spelling, and Vocal Music.
SENIOR DEPARTMENT
SENIOR DEPARTMENT
Third Class
Third Class
Virgil, (finished); Cicero’s Select Orations; Modern History; Plane Geometry; Moral Philosophy; Critical Reading of Young’s Poems; Perspective Drawing; Rhetoric; Logic, Composition, and Vocal Music.
Virgil, (finished); Cicero’s Select Orations; Modern History; Plane Geometry; Moral Philosophy; Critical Reading of Young’s Poems; Perspective Drawing; Rhetoric; Logic, Composition, and Vocal Music.
Second Class
Second Class
Livy; Horace, (Odes); Natural Theology; small Compend of Ecclesiastical History; Female Biography; Algebra; Natural Philosophy, (Mechanics, Hydrostatics, Pneumatics, and Acoustics); Intellectual Philosophy; Evidences of Christianity; Composition, and Vocal Music.
Livy; Horace, (Odes); Natural Theology; a brief overview of Ecclesiastical History; Women’s Biography; Algebra; Natural Philosophy, (Mechanics, Hydrostatics, Pneumatics, and Acoustics); Intellectual Philosophy; Evidence of Christianity; Composition and Vocal Music.
First Class
First Class
Horace, (finished); Tacitus; Natural Philosophy, (Electricity, Optics, Magnetism, Galvanism); Astronomy, Chemistry, Mineralogy, and Geology; Compend of Political Economy; Composition, and Vocal Music.
Horace, (finished); Tacitus; Natural Philosophy, (Electricity, Optics, Magnetism, Galvanism); Astronomy, Chemistry, Mineralogy, and Geology; Compendium of Political Economy; Composition, and Vocal Music.
The French, Spanish, Italian, or Greek languages may be attended to, if required, at any time.
The French, Spanish, Italian, or Greek languages can be studied at any time if needed.
The Exchange is very handsome, and ranks about midway between the heavy gloom that hangs over our London merchants, and the light and lofty elegance which decorates the Bourse at Paris. The churches are plain, but very neat, and kept in perfect repair within and without; but I saw none which had the least pretension to splendour; the Catholic Cathedral at Baltimore is the only church in America which has.
The Exchange is quite impressive, sitting somewhere between the heavy gloom that surrounds our London merchants and the bright and elegant atmosphere of the Bourse in Paris. The churches are simple but well-maintained, both inside and out; however, I didn’t see any that even remotely claimed to be grand. The Catholic Cathedral in Baltimore is the only church in America that does.
At New York, as every where else, they show within, during the time of service, like beds of tulips, so gay, so bright, so beautiful, are the long rows of French bonnets and pretty faces; rows but rarely broken by the unribboned heads of the male population; the proportion is about the same as I have remarked elsewhere. Excepting at New York, I never saw the other side of the picture, but there I did. On the opposite side of the North River, about three miles higher up, is a place called Hoboken. A gentleman who possessed a handsome mansion and grounds there, also possessed the right of ferry, and to render this productive, he has restricted his pleasure grounds to a few beautiful acres, laying out the remainder simply and tastefully as a public walk. It is hardly possible to imagine one of greater attraction; a broad belt of light underwood and flowering shrubs, studded at intervals with lofty forest trees, runs for two miles along a cliff which overhangs the matchless Hudson; sometimes it feathers the rocks down to its very margin, and at others leaves a pebbly shore, just rude enough to break the gentle waves, and make a music which mimics softly the loud chorus of the ocean. Through this beautiful little wood, a broad well gravelled terrace is led by every point which can exhibit the scenery to advantage; narrower and wilder paths diverge at intervals, some into the deeper shadow of the wood, and some shelving gradually to the pretty coves below.
At New York, like everywhere else, during the service, the scene inside resembles beds of tulips – so cheerful, so bright, so beautiful are the long rows of French bonnets and pretty faces; rows only rarely interrupted by the unribboned heads of the men; the ratio is about the same as I've noticed elsewhere. Except in New York, I never saw the other side of the picture, but there, I did. Across the North River, about three miles upstream, is a place called Hoboken. A gentleman who owned a beautiful mansion and grounds there also had the rights to a ferry, and to make it profitable, he limited his pleasure grounds to a few lovely acres, designing the rest simply and tastefully as a public walkway. It's hard to imagine a more inviting spot; a broad belt of light underbrush and flowering shrubs, dotted with tall trees, stretches for two miles along a cliff that overlooks the stunning Hudson River; sometimes it hugs the rocks all the way to the edge, while at other times it leaves a pebbly shore, just rough enough to break the gentle waves and create a sound that softly mimics the loud chorus of the ocean. Throughout this lovely little wood, a wide, well-graveled terrace leads to every point that showcases the scenery beautifully; narrower, wilder paths branch off at intervals, some diving into the deeper shade of the woods and others gently sloping down to the charming coves below.
The price of entrance to this little Eden, is the six cents you pay at the ferry. We went there on a bright Sunday afternoon, expressly to see the humours of the place. Many thousand persons were scattered through the grounds; of these we ascertained, by repeatedly counting, that nineteen-twentieths were men. The ladies were at church. Often as the subject has pressed upon my mind, I think I never so strongly felt the conviction that the Sabbath-day, the holy day, the day on which alone the great majority of the Christian world can spend their hours as they please, is ill passed (if passed entirely) within brick walls, listening to an earth-born preacher, charm he never so wisely.
The cost to enter this little paradise is the six cents you pay at the ferry. We visited on a bright Sunday afternoon, specifically to experience the atmosphere of the place. Thousands of people were spread out across the grounds; after counting a few times, we found that nineteen out of twenty were men. The women were at church. Though I’ve thought about it often, I don’t think I’ve ever felt more strongly that the Sabbath—the holy day, the one day when most of the Christian world can spend their time freely—is poorly spent (if it’s spent entirely) inside brick walls, listening to an earth-born preacher, no matter how wisely he may speak.
“Oh! how can they renounce the boundless store
Of charms, which Nature to her vot’ries yields!
The warbling woodland, the resounding shore,
The pomp of groves, and garniture of fields,
All that the genial ray of morning gilds,
And all that echoes to the song of even,
All that the mountain’s sheltering bosom yields,
And all the dread magnificence of heaven;
Oh! how can they renounce, and hope to be forgiven!”
“Oh! how can they give up the endless treasures
Of beauty that Nature offers her followers!
The singing woods, the crashing shore,
The grandeur of groves, and the beauty of fields,
Everything that the warm morning light touches,
And everything that responds to the evening song,
Everything that the mountain’s protective embrace provides,
And all the awe-inspiring majesty of the sky;
Oh! how can they give up, and expect to be forgiven!”
How is it that the men of America, who are reckoned good husbands and good fathers, while they themselves enjoy sufficient freedom of spirit to permit their walking forth into the temple of the living God, can leave those they love best on earth, bound in the iron chains of a most tyrannical fanaticism? How can they breathe the balmy air, and not think of the tainted atmosphere so heavily weighing upon breasts still dearer than their own? How can they gaze upon the blossoms of the spring, and not remember the fairer cheeks of their young daughters, waxing pale, as they sit for long sultry hours, immured with hundreds of fellow victims, listening to the roaring vanities of a preacher canonized by a college of old women? They cannot think it needful to salvation,or they would not withdraw themselves. Wherefore is it? Do they fear these self-elected, self-ordained priests, and offer up their wives and daughters to propitiate them? Or do they deem their hebdomadal freedom more complete, because their wives and daughters are shut up four or five times in the day at church or chapel? It is true, that at Hoboken, as every where else, there are reposoires, which, as you pass them, blast the sense for a moment, by reeking forth the fumes of whiskey and tobacco, and it may be that these cannot be entered with a wife or daughter. The proprietor of the grounds, however, has contrived with great taste to render these abominations not unpleasing to the eye; there is one in particular, which has quite the air of a Grecian temple, and did they drink wine instead of whiskey, it might be inscribed to Bacchus; but in this particular, as in many others, the ancient and modern Republics differ.
How is it that American men, who are considered good husbands and fathers, and enjoy enough freedom to enter the temple of the living God, can leave those they love most in the world, chained by the oppressive fanaticism? How can they take in the pleasant air without thinking of the heavy burden that weighs on the chests of those they care about even more than themselves? How can they look at the blossoms of spring and not remember the pale faces of their young daughters, sitting for long, hot hours locked away with hundreds of fellow victims, listening to the empty rants of a preacher idolized by a college of older women? They can’t think it’s necessary for salvation, or else they wouldn’t separate themselves from them. Why is that? Do they fear these self-appointed, self-ordained priests and sacrifice their wives and daughters to appease them? Or do they think their weekly freedom is more complete because their wives and daughters are kept shut up in church or chapel four or five times a day? It’s true that at Hoboken, like everywhere else, there are reposoires that, as you pass them, overwhelm the senses for a moment with the stench of whiskey and tobacco, and maybe those can't be entered with a wife or daughter. However, the owner of the grounds has cleverly made these places somewhat visually appealing; there’s one in particular that resembles a Grecian temple, and if they served wine instead of whiskey, it could be dedicated to Bacchus; but in this regard, as in many others, the ancient and modern republics are different.
It is impossible not to feel, after passing one Sunday in the churches and chapels of New York, and the next in the gardens of Hoboken, that the thousands of well-dressed men you see enjoying themselves at the latter, have made over the thousands of well-dressed women you saw exhibited at the former, into the hands of the priests, at least, for the day. The American people arrogate to themselves a character of superior morality and religion, but this division of their hours of leisure does not give me a favourable idea of either.
It’s hard not to notice, after spending one Sunday in the churches and chapels of New York and the next in the gardens of Hoboken, that the thousands of well-dressed men enjoying themselves there have essentially taken the thousands of well-dressed women from those churches and put them in the hands of the priests, at least for the day. The American people see themselves as morally and religiously superior, but this split in how they spend their leisure time doesn’t leave me with a good impression of either.
I visited all the exhibitions in New York. The Medici of the Republic must exert themselves a little more before these can become even respectable. The worst of the business is, that with the exception of about half a dozen individuals, the good citizens are more than contented, they are delighted.
I visited all the exhibitions in New York. The Medici of the Republic need to put in a bit more effort before these can become truly respectable. The worst part is that, apart from about half a dozen people, the good citizens are not just satisfied; they are thrilled.
The newspaper lungs of the Republic breathe forth praise and triumph, may, almost pant with extacy in speaking of their native chef d’oeuvres. I should be hardly believed were I to relate the instances which fell in my way, of the utter ignorance respecting pictures to be found among persons of the first standing in society. Often where a liberal spirit exists, and a wish to patronise the fine arts is expressed, it is joined to a profundity of ignorance on the subject almost inconceivable. A doubt as to the excellence of their artists is very nervously received, and one gentleman, with much civility, told me, that at the present era, all the world were aware that competition was pretty well at an end between our two nations, and that a little envy might naturally be expected to mix with the surprise with which the mother country beheld the distance at which her colonies were leaving her behind them.
The newspapers of the Republic are full of praise and excitement, almost gasping with joy as they talk about their native masterpieces. You'd hardly believe the stories I came across regarding the complete lack of knowledge about art among highly regarded people in society. Often, where there is a genuine desire to support the fine arts, it’s paired with an almost unbelievable level of ignorance about the topic. Any doubt about the quality of their artists is met with great defensiveness, and one gentleman, quite politely, told me that nowadays everyone knows that competition between our two nations has largely faded, and a bit of envy is to be expected along with the astonishment the mother country feels as her colonies race ahead.
I must, however, do the few artists with whom I became acquainted, the justice to say, that their own pretensions are much more modest than those of their patrons for them. I have heard several confess and deplore their ignorance of drawing, and have repeatedly remarked a sensibility to the merit of European artists, though perhaps only known by engravings, and a deference to their authority, which showed a genuine feeling for the art. In fact, I think that there is a very considerable degree of natural talent for painting in America, but it has to make its way through darkness and thick night. When an academy is founded, their first care is to hang the walls of its exhibition room with all the unutterable trash that is offered to them. No living models are sought for; no discipline as to the manner of study is enforced. Boys who know no more of human form, than they do of the eyes, nose, and mouth in the moon, begin painting portraits. If some of them would only throw away their palettes for a year, and learn to draw; if they would attend anatomical lectures, and take notes, not in words, but in forms, of joints and muscles, their exhibitions would soon cease to be so utterly below criticism.
I have to say, the few artists I got to know are much more humble about their abilities than their supporters are. I've heard several admit and lament their lack of drawing skills, and I've often noticed their appreciation for the talent of European artists, even if they only know them through engravings, as well as their respect for their authority, which shows a real passion for the art. Honestly, I believe there’s a significant amount of natural talent for painting in America, but it struggles to emerge in the dark. Whenever an academy is established, the first priority is to fill the exhibition room with all the awful art they receive. They don’t look for live models, and there's no discipline regarding how to study. Young artists, who know as little about the human body as they do about the eyes, nose, and mouth on the moon, start painting portraits. If some of them would just put down their palettes for a year and learn to draw; if they would attend anatomy lectures and take notes, not in words, but in shapes of joints and muscles, their exhibitions wouldn’t be so hopelessly bad anymore.
The most interesting exhibition open when I was there was, decidedly, Colonel Trumbold’s; and how the patriots of America can permit this truly national collection to remain a profitless burden on the hands of the artist, it is difficult to understand. Many of the sketches are masterly; but like his illustrious countryman, West, his sketches are his chef d’oeuvres.
The most interesting exhibition open when I was there was definitely Colonel Trumbold’s. It's hard to understand how the patriots of America can let this truly national collection stay a profitless burden on the artist’s hands. Many of the sketches are exceptional, but just like his famous fellow countryman, West, his sketches are his chef d’oeuvres.
I can imagine nothing more perfect than the interior of the public institutions of New York. There is a practical good sense in all their arrangements that must strike foreigners very forcibly. The Asylum for the Destitute offers a hint worth taking. It is dedicated to the reformation of youthful offenders of both sexes, and it is as admirable in the details of its management, as in its object. Every part of the institution is deeply interesting; but there is a difference very remarkable between the boys and the girls. The boys are, I think, the finest set of lads I ever saw brought together; bright looking, gay, active, and full of intelligence. The girls are exactly in reverse; heavy, listless, indifferent, and melancholy. In conversing with the gentleman who is the general superintendant of the establishment, I made the remark to him, and he told me, that the reality corresponded with the appearance. All of them had been detected in some act of dishonesty; but the boys, when removed from the evil influence which had led them so to use their ingenuity, rose like a spring when a pressure is withdrawn; and feeling themselves once more safe from danger and from shame, hope and cheerfulness animated every countenance. But the pour girls, on the contrary, can hardly look up again. They are as different as an oak and a lily after a storm. The one, when the fresh breeze blows over it, shakes the raindrops from its crest, and only looks the brighter; the other, its silken leaves once soiled, shrinks from the eye, and is levelled to the earth for ever.
I can’t imagine anything more perfect than the interiors of New York’s public institutions. There’s a practical sense in all their arrangements that would impress foreigners greatly. The Asylum for the Destitute offers a valuable example. It’s focused on reforming young offenders of both genders, and it’s just as impressive in how it’s run as it is in its mission. Every part of the institution is really interesting; however, there’s a striking difference between the boys and the girls. The boys are, in my opinion, the finest group of young men I’ve ever seen gathered together; they’re bright, cheerful, energetic, and full of intelligence. The girls, on the other hand, are quite the opposite; they seem heavy, apathetic, indifferent, and sad. When I spoke with the gentleman who is the general superintendent of the facility, I mentioned this observation, and he told me that the reality matched the appearance. All of them had been caught in some act of dishonesty, but the boys, once they were removed from the negative influences that led them to misuse their talents, bounced back like a spring when the pressure is released; feeling safe from danger and shame again, hope and happiness lit up their faces. But the poor girls, in contrast, can hardly lift their heads again. They’re as different as an oak and a lily after a storm. The oak, when a fresh breeze blows over it, shakes off the raindrops and looks even brighter; the lily, with its once-silken leaves now dirty, shrinks from view and remains flattened on the ground forever.
We spent a delightful day in New Jersey, in visiting, with a most agreeable party, the inclined planes, which are used instead of locks on the Morris canal.
We had a lovely day in New Jersey, visiting the inclined planes, which are used instead of locks on the Morris Canal, with a very pleasant group.
This is a very interesting work; it is one among a thousand which prove the people of America to be the most enterprising in the world. I was informed that this important canal, which connects the waters of the Hudson and the Delaware, is a hundred miles long, and in this distance overcomes a variation of level amounting to sixteen hundred feet. Of this, fourteen hundred are achieved by inclined planes. The planes average about sixty feet of perpendicular lift each, and are to support about forty tons. The time consumed in passing them is twelve minutes for one hundred feet of perpendicular rise. The expense is less than a third of what locks would be for surmounting the same rise. If we set about any more canals, this may be worth attending to.
This is a really interesting piece; it's one of many that show how the people of America are the most enterprising in the world. I was told that this important canal, which connects the waters of the Hudson and the Delaware, is a hundred miles long and overcomes a level change of sixteen hundred feet. Of that, fourteen hundred feet is achieved by inclined planes. The planes have an average vertical lift of about sixty feet each and are designed to support around forty tons. The time it takes to go up them is twelve minutes for every hundred feet of vertical rise. The cost is less than a third of what it would be to use locks for the same rise. If we plan on building more canals, this is something worth considering.
This Morris canal is certainly an extraordinary work; it not only varies its level sixteen hundred feet, but at one point runs along the side of a mountain at thirty feet above the tops of the highest buildings in the town of Paterson, below; at another it crosses the falls of the Passaic in a stone aqueduct sixty feet above the water in the river. This noble work, in a great degree, owes its existence to the patriotic and scientific energy of Mr. Cadwallader Colden.
This Morris Canal is truly an impressive feat; it changes its elevation by sixteen hundred feet, and at one point, it runs along the side of a mountain, thirty feet above the tallest buildings in Paterson below. At another point, it crosses the Passaic Falls through a stone aqueduct that is sixty feet above the river's water. This remarkable project is largely thanks to the patriotic and scientific efforts of Mr. Cadwallader Colden.
There is no point in the national character of the Americans which commands so much respect as the boldness and energy with which public works are undertaken and carried through. Nothing stops them if a profitable result can be fairly hoped for. It is this which has made cities spring up amidst the forests with such inconceivable rapidity; and could they once be thoroughly persuaded that any point of the ocean had a hoard of dollars beneath it, I have not the slightest doubt that in about eighteen months we should see a snug covered rail-road leading direct to the spot.
There’s nothing about American character that garners as much respect as the boldness and energy with which they take on and complete public projects. Nothing holds them back if they can reasonably expect a profitable outcome. This is what has caused cities to pop up in the forests at such an incredible pace; and if they were ever completely convinced that any part of the ocean hid a treasure trove of money, I have no doubt that in about eighteen months, we would see a well-constructed railway leading straight to that location.
I was told at New York, that in many parts of the state it was usual to pay the service of the Presbyterian ministers in the following manner. Once a year a day is fixed, on which some member of every family in a congregation meet at their minister’s house in the afternoon. They each bring an offering (according to their means) of articles necessary for housekeeping. The poorer members leave their contributions in a large basket, placed for the purpose, close to the door of entrance. Those of more importance, and more calculated to do honour to the piety of the donors, are carried into the room where the company is assembled. Sugar, coffee, tea, cheese, barrels of flour, pieces of Irish linen, sets of china and of glass, were among the articles mentioned to me as usually making parts of these offerings. After the party is assembled, and the business of giving and receiving is dispatched, tea, coffee, and cakes are handed round; but these are not furnished at any expense either of trouble or money to the minster, for selected ladies of the congregation take the whole arrangement upon themselves. These meetings are called spinning visits.
I was told in New York that in many parts of the state, it's common to pay the service of Presbyterian ministers in the following way. Once a year, a day is set for members of each family in a congregation to meet at their minister’s house in the afternoon. Everyone brings an offering (based on their ability) of household items. The poorer members leave their contributions in a large basket placed by the entrance. More significant contributions, which honor the generosity of the donors, are brought into the room where everyone is gathered. Sugar, coffee, tea, cheese, barrels of flour, pieces of Irish linen, and sets of china and glassware were among the items mentioned to me as part of these offerings. After everyone is gathered and the giving and receiving are done, tea, coffee, and cakes are served; however, these are provided without any cost or effort from the minister since selected women from the congregation handle all the arrangements. These gatherings are called spinning visits.
Another New York custom, which does not seem to have so reasonable a cause, is the changing house once a year. On the 1st of May the city of New York has the appearance of sending off a population flying from the plague, or of a town which had surrendered on condition of carrying away all their goods and chattels. Rich furniture and ragged furniture, carts, waggons, and drays, ropes, canvas, and straw, packers, porters, and draymen, white, yellow, and black, occupy the streets from east to west, from north to south, on this day. Every one I spoke to on the subject complained of this custom as most annoying, but all assured me it was unavoidable, if you inhabit a rented house. More than one of my New York friends have built or bought houses solely to avoid this annual inconvenience.
Another New York tradition, which doesn’t seem to have a very good reason, is the annual moving day. On May 1st, New York City looks like it's sending off a population fleeing from a plague, or like a town that surrendered with the condition that they could take all their belongings. Expensive furniture and shabby furniture, carts, wagons, and trucks, ropes, tarps, and straw, movers, porters, and drivers—people of all races—fill the streets from east to west and from north to south on this day. Everyone I talked to about it complained that this custom is really annoying, but they all said it was unavoidable if you live in a rented place. More than one of my New York friends has built or bought houses just to avoid this yearly hassle.
There are a great number of negroes in New York, all free; their emancipation having been completed in 1827. Not even in Philadelphia, where the anti-slavery opinions have been the most active and violent, do the blacks appear to wear an air of so much consequence as they do at New York. They have several chapels, in which negro ministers officiate; and a theatre in which none but negroes perform. At this theatre a gallery is appropriated to such whites as choose to visit it; and here only are they permitted to sit; following in this, with nice etiquette, and equal justice, the arrangement of the white theatres, in all of which is a gallery appropriated solely to the use of the blacks. I have often, particularly on a Sunday, met groups of negroes, elegantly dressed; and have been sometimes amused by observing the very superior air of gallantry assumed by the men, when in attendance on their belles, to that of the whites in similar circumstances. On one occasion we met in Broadway a young negress in the extreme of the fashion, and accompanied by a black beau, whose toilet was equally studied; eye-glass, guard-chain, nothing was omitted; he walked beside his sable goddess uncovered, and with an air of the most tender devotion. At the window of a handsome house which they were passing, stood a very pretty white girl, with two gentlemen beside her; but alas! both of them had their hats on, and one was smoking!
There are a lot of Black people in New York, all free, as their emancipation was completed in 1827. Even in Philadelphia, where anti-slavery views have been the most active and intense, Black individuals seem to carry themselves with more significance in New York. They have several churches with Black ministers, and a theater where only Black performers take the stage. In this theater, a gallery is set aside for any white visitors who choose to come, and that’s the only area they’re allowed to sit in, mirroring the arrangement of white theaters that also have a section just for Black audiences. I have often, especially on Sundays, seen groups of Black people elegantly dressed, and I’ve sometimes been amused by the notably superior air of gallantry the men display when they’re with their dates compared to the white men in similar situations. One time, we encountered a young Black woman in the height of fashion, accompanied by a sharply dressed Black guy who had clearly put thought into his appearance; he had an eyeglass, a guard chain—nothing was missing. He walked beside his beautiful companion uncovered, with an air of the utmost devotion. As they passed a fancy house, a pretty white girl stood at the window with two men beside her; however, both of them had their hats on, and one was smoking!
If it were not for the peculiar manner of walking, which distinguishes all American women, Broadway might be taken for a French street, where it was the fashion for very smart ladies to promenade. The dress is entirely French; not an article (except perhaps the cotton stockings) must be English, on pain of being stigmatized as out of the fashion. Every thing English is decidedly mauvais ton; English materials, English fashions, English accent, English manner, are all terms of reproach; and to say that an unfortunate looks like an English woman, is the cruellest satire which can be uttered.
If it weren't for the unique way American women walk, Broadway could be mistaken for a French street, where it's trendy for fashionable ladies to stroll. The clothing is completely French; not a single piece (except maybe the cotton stockings) can be English without being labeled out of style. Anything British is definitely considered mauvais ton; British fabrics, British styles, British accents, and British manners are all seen as insults; saying that someone unfortunate resembles an English woman is the harshest criticism one could make.
I remember visiting France almost immediately after we had made the most offensive invasion of her territory that can well be imagined, yet, despite the feelings which lengthened years of war must have engendered, it was the fashion to admire every thing English. I suppose family quarrels are most difficult to adjust; for fifteen years of peace have not been enough to calm the angry feelings of brother Jonathan towards the land of his fathers,
I remember visiting France shortly after we made the most offensive invasion of her territory imaginable, yet, despite the feelings that years of war must have created, it was fashionable to admire everything English. I guess family disagreements are the hardest to resolve; even fifteen years of peace haven't been enough to calm brother Jonathan's anger towards the land of his ancestors,
“The which he hateth passing well.”
“The thing he hates very much.”
It is hardly needful to say the most courteous amenity of manner distinguishes the reception given to foreigners by the patrician class of Americans.
It’s important to note that the most polite and gracious behavior sets apart how the patrician class of Americans welcomes foreigners.
Gentlemen, in the old world sense of the term, are the same every where; and an American gentleman and his family know how to do the honours of their country to strangers of every nation, as well as any people on earth. But this class, though it decidedly exists, is a very small one, and cannot, in justice, be represented as affording a specimen of the whole.
Gentlemen, in the traditional sense of the word, are the same everywhere; and an American gentleman and his family know how to represent their country to strangers from every nation, just like any other people on earth. However, this class, while it definitely exists, is quite small and cannot fairly be seen as a true representation of the whole.
Most of the houses in New York are painted on the outside, but in a manner carefully to avoid disfiguring the material which it preserves: on the contrary, nothing can be neater. They are now using a great deal of a beautiful stone called Jersey freestone; it is of a warm rich brown, and extremely ornamental to the city wherever it has been employed. They have also a grey granite of great beauty. The trottoir paving, in most of the streets, is extremely good, being of large flag stones, very superior to the bricks of Philadelphia.
Most of the houses in New York are painted on the outside, but in a way that carefully avoids damaging the material they're made of: in fact, nothing looks neater. They're currently using a lot of a beautiful stone called Jersey freestone; it's a warm, rich brown and looks stunning in the city wherever it's used. They also have a lovely grey granite. The sidewalk paving in most of the streets is really good, made of large flagstones, which are much better than the bricks used in Philadelphia.
At night the shops, which are open till very late, are brilliantly illuminated with gas, and all the population seem as much alive as in London or Paris. This makes the solemn stillness of the evening hours in Philadelphia still more remarkable.
At night, the shops that stay open until late are brightly lit with gas, and everyone seems just as lively as in London or Paris. This makes the quiet stillness of the evening hours in Philadelphia even more striking.
There are a few trees in different parts of the city, and I observed young ones planted, and guarded with much care; were they more abundant it would be extremely agreeable, for the reflected light of their fierce summer sheds intolerable day.
There are a few trees in various parts of the city, and I noticed young ones being planted and carefully protected; if there were more of them, it would be very pleasant, as the reflected light from their intense summer can be unbearable.
Ice is in profuse abundance; I do not imagine that there is a house in the city without the luxury of a piece of ice to cool the water, and harden the butter.
Ice is plentiful; I can't imagine there's a house in the city without the luxury of a piece of ice to chill the water and firm up the butter.
The hackney coaches are the best in the world, but abominably dear, and it is necessary to be on the qui vive in making your bargain with the driver; if you do not, he has the power of charging immoderately. On my first experiment I neglected this, and was asked two dollars and a half for an excursion of twenty minutes. When I referred to the waiter of the hotel, he asked if I had made a bargain. “No.” “Then I expect” (with the usual look of triumph) “that the Yankee has been too smart for you.”
The hackney cabs are the best in the world, but they're incredibly expensive, and you need to be alert when making a deal with the driver; if you aren't, he can charge you way too much. When I first tried this, I didn't do that and was quoted two and a half dollars for a twenty-minute ride. When I asked the hotel waiter about it, he wanted to know if I had agreed on a price. “No.” “Then I bet” (with that typical look of satisfaction) “that the American has outsmarted you.”
The private carriages of New York are infinitely handsomer and better appointed than any I saw elsewhere; the want of smart liveries destroys much of the gay effect, but, on the whole, a New York summer equipage, with the pretty women and beautiful children it contains, look extremely well in Broadway, and would not be much amiss anywhere.
The private carriages in New York are much more attractive and better equipped than any I've seen elsewhere; the lack of stylish uniforms takes away some of the festive vibe, but overall, a New York summer carriage, with the lovely women and beautiful children inside, looks great on Broadway and would fit in well anywhere.
The luxury of the New York aristocracy is not confined to the city; hardly an acre of Manhatten Island but shows some pretty villa or stately mansion. The most chosen of these are on the north and east rivers, to whose margins their lawns descend. Among these, perhaps, the loveliest is one situated in the beautiful village of Bloomingdale; here, within the space of sixteen acres, almost every variety of garden scenery may be found. To describe all its diversity of hill and dale, of wood and lawn, of rock and river, would be in vain; nor can I convey an idea of it by comparison, for I never saw anything like it. How far the elegant hospitality which reigns there may influence my impression, I know not; but, assuredly, no spot I have ever seen dwells more freshly on my memory, nor did I ever find myself in a circle more calculated to give delight in meeting, and regret at parting, than that of Woodlawn.
The luxury of New York's elite isn't limited to the city; almost every acre of Manhattan Island showcases some lovely villa or grand mansion. The most popular ones are along the north and east rivers, where their lawns stretch down to the water. Among these, one of the prettiest is located in the charming village of Bloomingdale; here, within sixteen acres, you can find almost every type of garden scenery. Describing all its variety of hills and valleys, woods and lawns, rocks and rivers would be futile; I can’t capture it through comparisons either, as I’ve never seen anything like it. How much the graceful hospitality there shapes my impression, I'm not sure; but surely, no place I’ve visited sticks in my memory as vividly, and I’ve never been in a gathering that brought more joy in meeting and regret in leaving than at Woodlawn.
CHAPTER XXXI
Reception of Captain Basil Hall’s Book in the United States
Reception of Captain Basil Hall’s Book in the United States
Having now arrived nearly at the end of our travels, I am induced, ere I conclude, again to mention what I consider as one of the most remarkable traits in the national character of the Americans; namely, their exquisite sensitiveness and soreness respecting everything said or written concerning them. Of this, perhaps, the most remarkable example I can give, is the effect produced on nearly every class of readers by the appearance of Captain Basil Hall’s “Travels in North America.” In fact, it was a sort of moral earthquake, and the vibration it occasioned through the nerves of the Republic, from one corner of the Union to the other, was by no means over when I left the country in July, 1831, a couple of years after the shock.
Having now nearly reached the end of our journey, I feel compelled, before I wrap things up, to mention once more what I believe is one of the most striking qualities of the American national character: their intense sensitivity and hurt feelings regarding everything said or written about them. A notable example of this is the reaction among almost all types of readers to Captain Basil Hall’s “Travels in North America.” In fact, it was like a moral earthquake, and the tremors it caused throughout the nation, from one end of the country to the other, were far from over when I left in July 1831, a couple of years after the initial shock.
I was in Cincinnati when these volumes came out, but it was not till July, 1830, that I procured a copy of them. One bookseller to whom I applied, told me that he had had a few copies before he understood the nature of the work, but that after becoming acquainted with it, nothing should induce him to sell another. Other persons of his profession must, however, have been less scrupulous, for the book was read in city, town, village, and hamlet, steam-boat, and stage-coach, and a sort of war-whoop was sent forth perfectly unprecedented in my recollection upon any occasion whatever.
I was in Cincinnati when these volumes were released, but I didn't get my hands on a copy until July 1830. One bookseller I approached told me he had a few copies initially, but once he understood what the work was about, he refused to sell any more. However, it seems other booksellers were less picky, because the book ended up being read in cities, towns, villages, and small communities, on steamboats and stagecoaches, and there was an unprecedented buzz about it that I can't recall ever seeing before.
It was fortunate for me that I did not procure these volumes till I had heard them very generally spoken of, for the curiosity I felt to know the contents of a work so violently anathematised, led me to make enquiries which elicited a great deal of curious feeling.
It was lucky for me that I didn't get these books until I had heard people talk about them quite a bit, because my curiosity to find out what a work so harshly criticized contained drove me to ask questions that sparked a lot of interesting reactions.
An ardent desire for approbation, and delicate sensitiveness under censure, have always, I believe, been considered as amiable traits of character; but the condition into which the appearance of Capt. Hall’s work threw the Republic, shows plainly that these feelings, if carried to excess, produce a weakness which amounts to imbecility.
An intense desire for approval and a heightened sensitivity to criticism have always been seen as positive character traits, but the situation that Capt. Hall’s work caused in the Republic clearly shows that if these feelings are taken too far, they lead to a weakness that borders on incompetence.
It was perfectly astonishing to hear men, who, on other subjects, were sane of judgment, utter their opinions upon this. I never heard of any instance in which the common sense generally found in national criticism was so overthrown by passion. I do not speak of the want of justice, and of fair and liberal interpretation: these, perhaps, were hardly to be expected. Other nations have been called thin-skinned, but the citizens of the Union have, apparently, no skins at all; they wince if a breeze blows over them, unless it be tempered with adulation. It was not, therefore, very surprising that the acute and forcible observations of a traveller they knew would be listened to, should be received testily. The extraordinary features of the business were, first, the excess of the rage into which they lashed themselves; and secondly, the puerility of the inventions by which they attempted to account for the severity with which they fancied they had been treated.
It was completely shocking to hear men, who were normally sensible on other topics, express their views on this. I’ve never encountered a situation where the common sense usually present in national criticism was so completely overwhelmed by emotion. I’m not talking about a lack of fairness or a balanced perspective; those were probably too much to expect. Other countries have been labeled overly sensitive, but it seems the citizens of the Union have no sensitivity at all; they flinch at the slightest criticism, unless it’s softened with flattery. So, it wasn’t too surprising that the sharp and insightful comments from a traveler they recognized would be received defensively. The remarkable aspects of the situation were, first, the extreme anger they worked themselves into, and second, the childish excuses they came up with to rationalize the harshness they believed they had faced.
Not content with declaring that the volumes contained no word of truth from beginning to end (which is an assertion I heard made very nearly as often as they were mentioned), the whole country set to work to discover the causes why Capt. Hall had visited the United States, and why he had published his book.
Not satisfied with claiming that the books had no truth from start to finish (which I heard almost as often as they were mentioned), the entire country set out to figure out why Capt. Hall had come to the United States and why he published his book.
I have heard it said with as much precision and gravity as if the statement had been conveyed by an official report, that Capt. Hall had been sent out by the British government expressly for the purpose of checking the growing admiration of England for the government of the United States, that it was by a commission from the Treasury he had come, and that it was only in obedience to orders that he had found anything to object to.
I’ve heard it said with the same seriousness as if it had come straight from an official report that Capt. Hall was sent out by the British government specifically to curb England’s increasing admiration for the United States government, that he came with a commission from the Treasury, and that he only found fault because he was following orders.
I do not give this as the gossip of a coterie; I am persuaded that it is the belief of a very considerable portion of the country. So deep is the conviction of this singular people that they cannot be seen without being admired, that they will not admit the possibility that anyone should honestly and sincerely find aught to disapprove in them, or their country.
I’m not sharing this as some insider gossip; I genuinely believe that a significant part of the country thinks this way. The conviction of these unique people is so strong that they can’t be viewed without being admired, and they refuse to accept the idea that anyone could honestly and sincerely find anything to criticize about them or their country.
At Philadelphia I met with a little anonymous book, written to show that Capt. Basil Hall was in no way to be depended on, for that he not only slandered the Americans, but was himself, in other respects, a person of very equivocal morals. One proof of this is given by a quotation of the following playful account of the distress occasioned by the want of a bell. The commentator calls it an instance of “shocking coarseness.”
At Philadelphia, I came across a small anonymous book that argued that Capt. Basil Hall couldn’t be trusted at all. It claimed that he not only slandered Americans but also had questionable morals in other ways. One piece of evidence provided is a playful account of the troubles caused by not having a bell. The commentator refers to this as an example of “shocking coarseness.”
“One day I was rather late for breakfast, and as there was no water in my jug, I set off, post haste, half shaved, half dressed, and more than half vexed, in quest of water, like a seaman on short allowance, hunting for rivulets on some unknown coast. I went up stairs, and down stairs, and in the course of my researches into half a dozen different apartments, might have stumbled on some lady’s chamber, as the song says, which considering the plight I was in, would have been awkward enough.”
“One day I was running pretty late for breakfast, and since there was no water in my jug, I rushed out, half-shaved, half-dressed, and more than a little annoyed, in search of water, like a sailor on a tight supply looking for streams on some unfamiliar shore. I went up and down the stairs, and during my search through half a dozen different rooms, I might have accidentally walked into some lady’s room, as the song goes, which would have been quite awkward given my situation.”
Another indication of this moral coarseness is pointed out in the passage where Capt. Hall says, he never saw a flirtation all the time he was in the Union.
Another sign of this moral dullness is highlighted in the part where Capt. Hall says he never witnessed a flirtation during his entire time in the Union.
The charge of ingratitude also was echoed from mouth to mouth. That he should himself bear testimony to the unvarying kindness of the reception he met with, and yet find fault with the country, was declared on all hands to be a proof of the most abominable ingratitude that it ever entered into the heart of man to conceive. I once ventured before about a dozen people to ask whether more blame would not attach to an author, if he suffered himself to be bribed by individual kindness to falsify facts, than if, despite all personal considerations, he stated them truly?
The accusation of ingratitude spread from person to person. That he would testify to the constant kindness he received and still criticize the country was seen by everyone as proof of the most despicable ingratitude imaginable. I once dared to ask a group of about a dozen people whether an author would be more at fault if he let personal kindness influence him to distort the truth, rather than stating it honestly despite any personal feelings.
“Facts!” cried the whole circle at once, “facts! I tell you there is not a word of fact in it from beginning to end.”
“Facts!” shouted the entire group at once, “facts! I’m telling you there isn’t a single fact in it from start to finish.”
The American Reviews are, many of them, I believe, well known in England; I need not, therefore, quote them here, but I sometimes wondered that they, none of them, ever thought of translating Obadiah’s curse into classic American; if they had done so, only placing (he, Basil Hall,) between brackets instead of (he, Obadiah,) it would have saved them a world of trouble.
The American Reviews are, I think, pretty well known in England; so I don’t need to quote them here. However, I’ve often wondered why none of them thought to translate Obadiah’s curse into classic American. If they had done that, just putting (he, Basil Hall) in brackets instead of (he, Obadiah), it would have saved them a lot of hassle.
I can hardly describe the curiosity with which I sat down at length to pursue these tremendous volumes; still less can I do justice to my surprise at their contents. To say that I found not one exaggerated statement throughout the work, is by no means saying enough. It is impossible for any one who knows the country not to see that Captain Hall earnestly sought out things to admire and commend. When he praises, it is with evident pleasure, and when he finds fault, it is with evident reluctance and restraint, excepting where motives purely patriotic urge him to state roundly what it is for the benefit of his country should be known.
I can barely express how curious I was when I finally sat down to dive into these incredible volumes; even less can I accurately convey my surprise at what I discovered inside. Saying that I didn’t find a single exaggerated claim throughout the work doesn’t truly capture my experience. Anyone who knows the country can see that Captain Hall genuinely searched for things to admire and praise. When he gives compliments, it’s clear he enjoys it, and when he points out flaws, he does so with obvious hesitation and restraint, except when his patriotic feelings compel him to clearly state what should be known for the benefit of his country.
In fact, Captain Hall saw the country to the greatest possible advantage. Furnished, of course, with letters of introduction to the most distinguished individuals, and with the still more influential recommendation of his own reputation, he was received in full drawing-room style and state from one end of the Union to the other. He saw the country in full dress, and had little or no opportunity of judging of it unhouselled, disappointed, unannealed, with all its imperfections on its head, as I and my family too often had.
In fact, Captain Hall experienced the country at its best. Equipped with letters of introduction to the most prominent people and bolstered by his own reputation, he was welcomed in grand style from one end of the Union to the other. He saw the country in top form and had little chance to judge it in its raw state, disappointed and flawed, as my family and I often had.
Captain Hall had certainly excellent opportunities of making himself acquainted with the form of the government and the laws; and of receiving, moreover, the best oral commentary upon them, in conversation with the most distinguished citizens. Of these opportunities he made excellent use; nothing important met his eye which did not receive that sort of analytical attention which an experienced and philosophical traveller alone can give. This has made his volumes highly interesting and valuable; but I am deeply persuaded, that were a man of equal penetration to visit the United States with no other means of becoming acquainted with the national character than the ordinary working-day intercourse of life, he would conceive an infinitely lower idea of the moral atmosphere of the country than Captain Hall appears to have done; and the internal conviction on my mind is strong, that if Captain Hall had not placed a firm restraint on himself, he must have given expression to far deeper indignation than any he has uttered against many points in the American character, with which he shows, from other circumstances, that he was well acquainted. His rule appears to have been to state just so much of the truth as would leave on the minds of his readers a correct impression, at the least cost of pain to the sensitive folks he was writing about. He states his own opinions and feelings, and leaves it to be inferred that he has good grounds for adopting them; but he spares the Americans the bitterness which a detail of the circumstances would have produced.
Captain Hall certainly had great opportunities to understand the government and its laws, and also to hear the best oral commentary on them from the most distinguished citizens. He took full advantage of these opportunities; nothing significant caught his attention without receiving the kind of analytical consideration that only an experienced and thoughtful traveler can provide. This made his books highly interesting and valuable. However, I firmly believe that if a man with equal insight were to visit the United States with no other way to understand the national character than the typical day-to-day interactions, he would have a far lower opinion of the country's moral environment than Captain Hall seems to have. I strongly feel that if Captain Hall hadn't restrained himself, he would have expressed much deeper indignation than he has shown regarding various aspects of American character, which he clearly had knowledge of based on other factors. His approach seems to have been to share just enough truth to leave his readers with an accurate impression, while causing the least discomfort to the sensitive individuals he was writing about. He shares his own opinions and feelings, hinting that he has good reasons for holding them, but he spares Americans the harshness that detailing the circumstances would have brought.
If any one chooses to say that some wicked antipathy to twelve millions of strangers is the origin of my opinion, I must bear it; and were the question one of mere idle speculation, I certainly would not court the abuse I must meet for stating it. But it is not so. I know that among the best, the most pious, the most benevolent of my countrymen, there are hundreds, nay, I fear thousands, who conscientiously believe that a greater degree of political and religious liberty (such as is possessed in America) would be beneficial for us. How often have I wished, during my abode in the United States, that one of these conscientious, but mistaken reasoners, fully possessed of his country’s confidence, could pass a few years in the United States, sufficiently among the mass of the citizens to know them, and sufficiently at leisure to trace effects to their causes. Then might we look for a statement which would teach these mistaken philanthropists to tremble at every symptom of democratic power among us; a statement which would make even our sectarians shudder at the thought of hewing down the Established Church, for they would be taught, by fearful example, to know that it was the bulwark which protects us from the gloomy horrors of fanatic superstition on one side, and the still more dreadful inroads of infidelity on the other. And more than all, such a man would see as clear as light, that where every class is occupied in getting money, and no class in spending it, there will neither be leisure for worshipping the theory of honesty, nor motive strong enough to put its restrictive doctrine in practice. Where every man is engaged in driving hard bargains with his fellows, where is the honoured class to be found into which gentleman-like feelings, principles, and practice, are necessary as an introduction?
If anyone wants to claim that my opinion stems from some terrible dislike for twelve million strangers, I have to accept it; and if this were just a matter of idle speculation, I definitely wouldn't seek out the criticism I know I’ll face for saying it. But it's not just that. I realize that among the best, kindest, and most generous people in my country, there are hundreds, even thousands, who genuinely believe that a greater level of political and religious freedom (like what we have in America) would benefit us. How often have I wished, during my time in the United States, that one of these well-intentioned but misguided individuals, who fully enjoys their country’s trust, could spend a few years in the U.S., getting to know the average citizens and having enough time to connect causes with their effects. Then, perhaps, we could expect an insight that would teach these misguided do-gooders to be cautious of every hint of democratic power among us; an insight that would make even our religious groups shudder at the idea of dismantling the Established Church, as they would learn, through stark examples, that it serves as the shield protecting us from the dark terrors of fanatical superstition on one side and the even worse encroachments of atheism on the other. Furthermore, such a person would clearly see that in a society where everyone is focused on making money and no one is spending it, there will be no time to worship the idea of honesty, nor a strong enough incentive to practice its restrictive principles. In a place where everyone is busy negotiating hard deals with each other, where can we find the respected class that requires gentlemanly feelings, principles, and practices as an introduction?
That there are men of powerful intellect, benevolent hearts, and high moral feeling in America, I know: and I could, if challenged to do so, name individuals surpassed by none of any country in these qualities; but they are excellent, despite their institutions, not in consequence of them. It is not by such that Captain Hall’s statements are called slanders, nor is it from such that I shall meet the abuse which I well know these pages will inevitably draw upon me; and I only trust I may be able to muster as much self-denial as my predecessor, who asserts in his recently published “Fragments,” that he has read none of the American criticisms on his book. He did wisely, if he wished to retain an atom of his kindly feeling toward America, and he has, assuredly, lost but little on the score of information, for these criticisms, generally speaking, consist of mere downright personal abuse, or querulous complaints of his ingratitude and ill usage of them; complaints which it is quite astonishing that any persons of spirit could indulge in.
I know there are people in America with powerful intellects, kind hearts, and strong moral values. If I had to, I could name individuals who are unmatched in these qualities by anyone from any other country; however, they are admirable despite the systems around them, not because of them. It's not from these individuals that Captain Hall’s comments are labeled as slander, nor will I receive criticism from them for the backlash I know these pages will bring. I can only hope to have as much self-restraint as my predecessor, who claims in his recently published “Fragments” that he hasn’t read any of the American critiques of his book. He was smart to do this if he wanted to keep any positive feelings toward America, and he’s likely not missed out on much useful information, as these critiques mostly consist of outright personal attacks or complaining about his supposed ingratitude and mistreatment of them—complaints that it's surprising anyone with any dignity could make.
The following good-humoured paragraphs from the Fragments, must, I think, rather puzzle the Americans. Possibly they may think that Captain Hall is quizzing them, when he says he has read none of their criticisms; but I think there is in these passages internal evidence that he has not seen them. For if he had read one-fiftieth part of the vituperation of his Travels, which it has been my misfortune to peruse, he could hardly have brought himself to write what follows.
The following light-hearted paragraphs from the Fragments might confuse Americans. They might assume that Captain Hall is teasing them when he claims he hasn't read any of their criticisms, but I believe there’s evidence in these passages showing that he genuinely hasn’t seen them. If he had read even a fraction of the harsh reviews of his Travels that I’ve had the unfortunate task of reading, he probably wouldn’t have been able to write what comes next.
If the Americans still refuse to shake the hand proffered to them in the true old John Bull spirit, they are worse folks than even I take them for.
If the Americans still won't accept the handshake offered to them in the true old John Bull spirit, they're even worse people than I think they are.
Captain Hall, after describing the hospitable reception he formerly met with, at a boarding-house in New York, goes on thus:—“If our hostess be still alive, I hope she will not repent of having bestowed her obliging attentions on one, who so many years afterwards made himself, he fears, less popular in her land, than he could wish to be amongst a people to whom he owes so much, and for whom he really feels so much kindness. He still anxiously hopes, however, they will believe him, when he declares, that, having said in his recent publication no more than what he conceived was due to strict truth, and to the integrity of history, as far as his observations and opinions went, he still feels, as he always has, and ever must continue to feel towards America, the heartiest good-will.
Captain Hall, after recalling the warm welcome he once received at a boarding house in New York, continues: "If our hostess is still alive, I hope she doesn’t regret her kind attention toward someone who, many years later, worries that he has become less popular in her country than he would like, among a people to whom he owes so much and for whom he genuinely feels a lot of kindness. He still hopes they will believe him when he says that, in his recent publication, he only stated what he thought was right according to the truth and the integrity of history, based on his observations and opinions. He still feels, as he always has and will continue to feel, the warmest goodwill towards America."
“The Americans are perpetually repeating that the foundation-stone of their liberty is fixed on the doctrine, that every man is free to form his own opinions, and to promulgate them in candour and in moderation. Is it meant that a foreigner is excluded from these privileges? If not, may I ask, in what respect have I passed these limitations? The Americans have surely no fair right to be offended because my views differ from their’s; and yet I am told I have been rudely handled by the press of that country. If my motives are distrusted, I can only say, I am sorely belied. If I am mistaken, regret at my political blindness were surely more dignified than anger on the part of those with whom I differ; and if it shall chance that I am in the right, the best confirmation of the correctness of my views, in the opinion of indifferent persons, will perhaps be found in the soreness of those, who wince when the truth is spoken.
“The Americans keep saying that the cornerstone of their liberty is based on the idea that everyone is free to form their own opinions and express them openly and reasonably. Does this mean that foreigners are excluded from these rights? If not, may I ask how I have crossed these boundaries? The Americans surely have no right to be upset because my views differ from theirs; yet, I’ve been told the press in that country has treated me harshly. If people doubt my intentions, I can only say I’ve been greatly misrepresented. If I am wrong, it would be far more dignified for those who disagree with me to feel regret over my political misunderstanding than to react with anger; and if I happen to be right, the best evidence supporting my views, in the eyes of neutral observers, may be the discomfort of those who flinch when the truth is spoken.”
“Yet, after all, few things would give me more real pleasure, than to know that my friends across the water would consent to take me at my word; and, considering what I have said about them as so much public matter, which it truly is, agree to reckon me, in my absence, and they always did, when I was amongst them, and, I am sure, they would count me, if I went back again, as a private friend. I differed with them in politics, and I differ with them now as much as ever; but I sincerely wish them happiness individually; and, as a nation, I shall rejoice if they prosper. As the Persians write, “What can I say more?” And I only hope these few words may help to make my peace with people who justly pride themselves on bearing no malice. As for myself, I have no peace to make; for I have studiously avoided reading any of the American criticisms on my book, in order that the kindly feelings I have ever entertained towards that country should not be ruffled. By this abstinence I may have lost some information, and perhaps missed many opportunities of correcting erroneous impressions. But I set so much store by the pleasing recollection of the journey itself, and of the hospitality with which my family were every where received, that whether it be right, or whether it be wrong, I cannot bring myself to read anything which might disturb these agreeable associations. So let us part in peace; or, rather, let us meet again in cordial communication; and if this little work shall find its way across the Atlantic, I hope it will be read there without reference to anything that has passed between us; or, at all events, with reference only to those parts of our former intercourse, which are satisfactory to all parties.”—Hall’s Fragments, Vol.1.p.200.
“Yet, after all, few things would make me happier than knowing that my friends across the ocean would take me at my word; and, considering what I’ve said about them as public information—which it truly is—agree to see me, even in my absence, and they always did when I was with them, as a personal friend. I disagreed with them politically, and I still do as much as ever; but I genuinely wish them personal happiness, and as a nation, I would be glad to see them thrive. As the Persians say, ‘What more can I say?’ I just hope these few words help me make peace with people who rightly take pride in holding no grudges. For my part, I have no peace to make; I have deliberately avoided reading any American critiques of my book to keep my positive feelings toward that country intact. By doing this, I may have missed some insights and lost chances to correct misunderstandings. But I value the enjoyable memories of my trip and the warmth with which my family was welcomed everywhere so much that, whether right or wrong, I can’t bring myself to read anything that might disturb those happy associations. So let’s part on good terms; or rather, let’s meet again in a friendly exchange; and if this little work makes its way across the Atlantic, I hope it will be read there without reference to anything that has occurred between us; or, at the very least, only in relation to the parts of our past interactions that are agreeable to everyone.”—Hall’s Fragments, Vol.1.p.200.
I really think it is impossible to read, not only this passage, but many others in these delightful little volumes, without feeling that their author is as little likely to deserve the imputation of harshness and ill-will, as any man that ever lived.
I really think it's impossible to read not just this passage, but many others in these charming little books, without feeling that their author is as unlikely to deserve the accusation of being harsh or unkind as any person who has ever lived.
In reading Capt. Hall’s volumes on America, the observation which, I think, struck me the most forcibly, and which certainly came the most completely home to my own feelings, was the following.
In reading Capt. Hall’s volumes on America, the observation that struck me the hardest, and which really resonated with my own feelings, was the following.
“In all my travels both amongst Heathens, and amongst Christians, I have never encountered any people by whom I found it nearly so difficult to make myself understood as by the Americans.”
“In all my travels among Heathens and Christians, I have never met any people with whom I found it nearly as hard to make myself understood as with the Americans.”
I have conversed in London and in Paris with foreigners of many nations, and often through the misty medium of an idiom imperfectly understood, but I remember no instance in which I found the same difficulty in conveying my sentiments, my impressions, and my opinions to those around me, as I did in America. Whatever faith may be given to my assertion, no one who has not visited the country can possibly conceive to what extent it is true. It is less necessary, I imagine, for the mutual understanding of persons conversing together, that the language should be the same, than that their ordinary mode of thinking, and habits of life should, in some degree, assimilate; whereas, in point of fact, there is hardly a single point of sympathy between the Americans and us; but whatever the cause, the fact is certainly as I have stated it, and herein, I think, rests the only apology for the preposterous and undignified anger felt and expressed against Capt. Hall’s work. They really cannot, even if they wished it, enter into any of his views, or comprehend his most ordinary feelings; and, therefore, they cannot believe in the sincerity of the impressions he describes. The candour which he expresses, and evidently feels, they mistake for irony, or totally distrust; his unwillingness to give pain to persons from whom he has received kindness, they scornfully reject as affectation; and, although they must know right well, in their own secret hearts, how infinitely more they lay at his mercy than he has chosen to betray, they pretend, even to themselves, that he has exaggerated the bad points of their character and institutions; whereas, the truth is, that he has let them off with a degree of tenderness which may be quite suitable for him to exercise, however little merited; while, at the same time, he has most industriously magnified their merits, whenever he could possibly find anything favourable. One can perfectly well understand why Capt. Hall’s avowed Tory principles should be disapproved of in the United States, especially as (with a questionable policy in a bookselling point of view, in these reforming times,) he volunteers a profession of political faith, in which, to use the Kentucky phrase, “he goes the whole hog,” and bluntly avows, in his concluding chapter, that he not only holds stoutly to Church and State, but that he conceives the English House of Commons to be, if not quite perfect, at least as much so for all the required purposes of representation as it can by possibility be made in practice. Such a downright thorough-going Tory and Anti-reformer, pretending to judge of the workings of the American democratical system, was naturally held to be a monstrous abomination, and it has been visited accordingly, both in America, and as I understand, with us also. The experience which Capt. Hall has acquired in visits to every part of the world, during twenty or thirty years, goes for nothing with the Radicals on either side the Atlantic: on the contrary, precisely in proportion to the value of that authority which is the result of actual observation, are they irritated to find its weight cast into the opposite scale. Had not Capt. Hall been converted by what he saw in North America, from the Whig faith he exhibited in his description of South America, his book would have been far more popular in England during the last two years of public excitement; it may, perhaps, be long before any justice is done to Capt. Hall’s book in the United States, but a less time will probably suffice to establish its claim to attention at home.
I’ve talked in London and Paris with people from many different countries, often through the unclear barrier of a language I only partially understood. However, I don’t recall ever having as much trouble expressing my thoughts, feelings, and opinions to those around me as I did in America. Whatever weight my claim carries, no one who hasn't been to the country could possibly imagine how true it is. I think it matters less that people speaking to each other use the same language than that they share a common way of thinking and certain lifestyle habits; yet, in reality, there’s hardly any connection between Americans and us. Whatever the reason, it’s definitely as I’ve described, and I believe this explains the absurd and undignified anger directed at Capt. Hall's work. They genuinely cannot, even if they wanted to, grasp his viewpoints or comprehend his most basic feelings; as a result, they cannot accept the sincerity of the impressions he shares. The honesty he showcases and clearly feels is often misinterpreted as sarcasm or met with skepticism; his reluctance to hurt those who have shown him kindness is dismissed as pretentiousness; and while they must know in their hearts that they put far more of themselves at risk than he reveals, they insist, even to themselves, that he has exaggerated their negative traits and institutions. In truth, he has spared them with a kindness that may be appropriate for him to show, no matter how undeserved it is; simultaneously, he has diligently highlighted their positive attributes whenever he could find something good to say. It’s easy to see why Capt. Hall’s openly Tory beliefs would be criticized in the United States, especially since, with questionable timing in the book market during these reform-focused times, he openly states his political beliefs, going all the way, to use the Kentucky phrase, and bluntly admitting in his final chapter that he firmly supports Church and State and believes the English House of Commons is, while not perfect, at least as good as it can be for all necessary representation. Such a straightforward, committed Tory and Anti-reformer pretending to evaluate the workings of the American democratic system would naturally be seen as a serious problem, which has been reflected in reactions both in America and, as I understand it, here too. Capt. Hall’s extensive experience traveling around the world for twenty or thirty years holds no weight with the Radicals on either side of the Atlantic; on the contrary, the more valid his firsthand observations are, the more upset they become to see them used against their views. If Capt. Hall hadn’t changed his mind about North America from the Whig beliefs he expressed regarding South America, his book would have been much more popular in England during the past two years of public unrest; it may take a while for Capt. Hall’s book to be fairly evaluated in the United States, but a shorter time will likely be enough for it to gain recognition at home.
CHAPTER XXXII
Journey to Niagara—Hudson—West Point—Hyde Park—Albany—Yankees—Trenton Falls—Rochester—Genesee Falls—Lockport
Journey to Niagara—Hudson—West Point—Hyde Park—Albany—Yankees—Trenton Falls—Rochester—Genesee Falls—Lockport
How quickly weeks glide away in such a city as New York, especially when you reckon among your friends some of the most agreeable people in either hemisphere. But we had still a long journey before us, and one of the wonders of the world was to be seen.
How quickly weeks fly by in a city like New York, especially when you count some of the most pleasant people in either hemisphere among your friends. But we still had a long journey ahead of us, and one of the wonders of the world was waiting to be seen.
On the 30th of May we set off for Niagara. I had heard so much of the surpassing beauty of the North River, that I expected to be disappointed, and to find reality flat after description. But it is not in the power of man to paint with a strength exceeding that of nature, in such scenes as the Hudson presents. Every mile shows some new and startling effect of the combination of rocks, trees, and water; there is no interval of flat or insipid scenery, from the moment you enter upon the river at New York, to that of quitting it at Albany, a distance of 180 miles.
On May 30th, we left for Niagara. I had heard so much about the incredible beauty of the North River that I expected to be let down and to find reality boring compared to the descriptions. But no one can capture the strength of nature in places like the Hudson River. Every mile reveals a new and striking combination of rocks, trees, and water; there’s no dull or lifeless scenery from the moment you enter the river in New York until you leave it in Albany, a distance of 180 miles.
For the first twenty miles the shore of New Jersey, on the left, offers almost a continued wall of trap rock, which from its perpendicular form, and lineal fissures, is called the Palisados. This wall sometimes rises to the height of a hundred and fifty feet, and sometimes sinks down to twenty. Here and there, a watercourse breaks its uniformity; and every where the brightest foliage, in all the splendour of the climate and the season, fringed and chequered the dark barrier. On the opposite shore, Manhatten Island, with its leafy coronet gemmed with villas, forms a lovely contrast to these rocky heights.
For the first twenty miles, the New Jersey shoreline on the left presents nearly a continuous wall of trap rock, which, due to its vertical structure and linear cracks, is called the Palisades. This wall sometimes rises to a height of one hundred and fifty feet and at other times drops down to twenty. Here and there, a stream disrupts its uniformity, and all around, the vibrant foliage, in all the glory of the climate and season, fringes and patterns the dark barrier. On the opposite shore, Manhattan Island, adorned with its leafy crown sprinkled with villas, creates a beautiful contrast to these rocky heights.
After passing Manhatten Island, the eastern shore gradually assumes a wild and rocky character, but ever varying; woods, lawns, pastures, and towering cliffs all meet the eye in quick succession, as the giant steam-boat cleaves its swift passage up the stream.
After passing Manhattan Island, the eastern shore gradually becomes wild and rocky, but it's always changing; forests, lawns, pastures, and towering cliffs all come into view in quick succession as the giant steamboat makes its fast way up the river.
For several miles the voyage is one of great interest independent of its beauty, for it passes many points where important events of the revolutionary war took place.
For several miles, the journey is really fascinating, not just because of the scenery, but also because it goes by many locations where significant events of the Revolutionary War occurred.
It was not without a pang that I looked on the spot where poor Andre was taken, and another where he was executed.
It wasn’t without a twinge of regret that I looked at the place where poor Andre was taken, and another where he was executed.
Several forts, generally placed in most commanding situations, still show by their battered ruins, where the struggle was strongest, and I felt no lack of that moral interest so entirely wanting in the new States, and without which no journey can, I think, continue long without wearying the spirits.
Several forts, usually positioned in the most strategic locations, still display their battered ruins from the fiercest battles. I didn't feel the absence of that moral significance, which is often missing in the new States, and without which, I believe, no journey can go on for long without wearing down the spirit.
About forty miles from New York you enter upon the Highlands, as a series of mountains which then flank the river on both sides, are called. The beauty of this scenery can only be conceived when it is seen. One might fancy that these capricious masses, with all their countless varieties of light and shade, were thrown together to show how passing lovely rocks and woods, and water could be. Sometimes a lofty peak shoots suddenly up into the heavens, showing in bold relief against the sky; and then a deep ravine sinks in solemn shadow, and draws the imagination into its leafy recesses. For several miles the river appears to form a succession of lakes; you are often enclosed on all sides by rocks rising directly from the very edge of the stream, and then you turn a point, the river widens, and again woods, lawns, and villages are reflected on its bosom.
About forty miles from New York, you come across the Highlands, which are a series of mountains that line the river on both sides. The beauty of this scenery can only be truly appreciated when you see it. You might think these varied formations, with all their different shades of light and dark, were arranged to showcase how incredibly beautiful rocks, trees, and water can be. Sometimes a tall peak suddenly rises into the sky, standing out sharply against the clouds; then a deep ravine drops into shadow, inviting your imagination into its leafy depths. For several miles, the river seems to create a series of lakes; you often find yourself surrounded by cliffs rising straight from the water's edge, and then as you round a bend, the river opens up, and once again, trees, meadows, and villages are mirrored on its surface.
The state prison of Sing Sing is upon the edge of the water, and has no picturesque effect to atone for the painful images it suggests; the “Sleepy Hollow” of Washington Irving, just above it, restores the imagination to a better tone.
The Sing Sing state prison is right by the water, and it doesn't have any charming views to make up for the troubling thoughts it brings to mind; the “Sleepy Hollow” by Washington Irving, just up the river, brings the imagination back to a more positive place.
West Point, the military academy of the United States, is fifty miles from New York. The scenery around it is magnificent, and though the buildings of the establishment are constructed with the handsome and unpicturesque regularity which marks the work of governments, they are so nobly placed, and so embosomed in woods, that they look beautiful. The lengthened notes of a French horn, which I presume was attending some of their military manoeuvres, sounded with deep and solemn sweetness as we passed.
West Point, the U.S. military academy, is fifty miles from New York. The scenery around it is stunning, and even though the buildings are designed with the elegant yet unremarkable uniformity typical of government constructions, they are so beautifully situated and surrounded by trees that they appear charming. The extended notes of a French horn, which I assume was part of their military drills, played with a deep and solemn sweetness as we went by.
About thirty miles further is Hyde Park, the magnificent seat of Dr. Hosack; here the misty summit of the distant Kaatskill begins to form the outline of the landscape; it is hardly possible to imagine anything more beautiful than this place. We passed a day there with great enjoyment; and the following morning set forward again in one of those grand floating hotels called steamboats. Either on this day, or the one before, we had two hundred cabin passengers on board, and they all sat down together to a table spread abundantly, and with considerable elegance. A continual succession of gentlemen’s seats, many of them extremely handsome, borders the river to Albany. We arrived there late in the evening, but had no difficulty in finding excellent accommodation.
About thirty miles further is Hyde Park, the stunning home of Dr. Hosack; here the misty peak of the distant Catskills starts to shape the landscape; it's hard to imagine anything more beautiful than this place. We spent a wonderful day there, and the next morning we set off again on one of those grand floating hotels called steamboats. Either on this day or the one before, we had two hundred cabin passengers on board, and they all gathered together at a table that was abundantly and elegantly set. A continuous row of gentlemen’s seats, many of which were quite stylish, lines the river up to Albany. We arrived there late in the evening but had no trouble finding great accommodations.
Albany is the state capital of New York, and has some very handsome public buildings; there are also some curious relics of the old Dutch inhabitants.
Albany is the state capital of New York and features some impressive public buildings; there are also some interesting remnants of the old Dutch settlers.
The first sixteen miles from Albany we travelled in a stage, to avoid a multitude of locks at the entrance of the Erie canal; but at Scenectedy we got on board one of the canal packet-boats for Utica.
The first sixteen miles from Albany, we traveled by stagecoach to skip a bunch of locks at the start of the Erie Canal; but in Schenectady, we boarded one of the canal packet boats to Utica.
With a very delightful party, of one’s own choosing, fine temperate weather, and a strong breeze to chase the mosquitos, this mode of travelling might be very agreeable, but I can hardly imagine any motive of convenience powerful enough to induce me again to imprison myself in a canal boat under ordinary circumstances. The accommodations being greatly restricted, every body, from the moment of entering the boat, acts upon a system of unshrinking egotism. The library of a dozen books, the backgammon board, the tiny berths, the shady side of the cabin, are all jostled for in a manner to make one greatly envy the power of the snail; at the moment I would willingly have given up some of my human dignity for the privilege of creeping into a shell of my own. To any one who has been accustomed in travelling, to be addressed with, “Do sit here, you will find it more comfortable,” the “You must go there, I made for this place first,” sounds very unmusical.
With a really enjoyable party of your choice, nice mild weather, and a strong breeze to keep the mosquitoes away, this way of traveling could be quite pleasant. However, I can hardly think of any reason that would be compelling enough to make me want to trap myself in a canal boat under normal circumstances. The accommodations are very limited, and everyone, from the moment they step onto the boat, operates on a level of unapologetic self-interest. The small library of a dozen books, the backgammon board, the cramped sleeping quarters, and the shady side of the cabin are all fought over in a way that makes you really envy the snail; at that moment, I would gladly have traded some of my human dignity for the chance to retreat into a shell of my own. For anyone who is used to being told when traveling, “Please sit here, you’ll find it more comfortable,” the “You need to go there, I claimed this spot first,” sounds really off.
There is a great quietness about the women of America (I speak of the exterior manner of persons casually met), but somehow or other, I should never call it gentleness. In such trying moments as that of fixing themselves on board a packet-boat, the men are prompt, determined, and will compromise any body’s convenience, except their own. The women are doggedly stedfast in their will, and till matters are settled, look like hedgehogs, with every quill raised, and firmly set, as if to forbid the approach of any one who might wish to rub them down. In circumstances where an English woman would look proud, and a French woman nonchalante, an American lady looks grim; even the youngest and the prettiest can set their lips, and knit their brows, and look as hard and unsocial as their grandmothers.
There’s a noticeable quietness about American women (I’m talking about the way people act when you meet them casually), but I wouldn’t call it gentleness. In challenging moments, like when they’re getting on a packet boat, the men are quick and determined, and they’ll inconvenience anyone else without a second thought. The women, on the other hand, are stubbornly resolute, and until things are sorted, they resemble hedgehogs, with all their quills up, as if to ward off anyone wanting to approach them. In situations where an English woman might appear proud and a French woman nonchalant, an American lady tends to look serious; even the youngest and prettiest can firm their lips, furrow their brows, and appear just as tough and unfriendly as their grandmothers.
Though not in the Yankee or New England country, we were bordering upon it sufficiently to meet in the stages and boats many delightful specimens of this most peculiar race. I like them extremely well, but I would not wish to have any business transactions with them, if I could avoid it, lest, to use their own phrase, “they should be too smart for me.”
Though we weren't in Yankee or New England territory, we were close enough to encounter many charming examples of this unique group on the stages and boats. I really like them, but I wouldn’t want to get into any business dealings with them if I could avoid it, for fear, as they say, “they might be too clever for me.”
It is by no means rare to meet elsewhere, in this working-day world of our’s, people who push acuteness to the verge of honesty, and sometimes, perhaps, a little bit beyond; but, I believe, the Yankee is the only one who will be found to boast of doing so. It is by no means easy to give a clear and just idea of a Yankee; if you hear his character from a Virginian, you will believe him a devil: if you listen to it from himself, you might fancy him a god—though a tricky one; Mercury turned righteous and notable. Matthews did very well, as far as “I expect,” “I calculate,” and “I guess;” but this is only the shell; there is an immense deal within, both of sweet and bitter. In acuteness, cautiousness, industry, and perseverance, he resembles the Scotch; in habits of frugal neatness, he resembles the Dutch; in love of lucre he doth greatly resemble the sons of Abraham; but in frank admission, and superlative admiration of all his own peculiarities, he is like nothing on earth but himself.
It's not uncommon to come across people in our busy world who take sharpness to the edge of honesty, and sometimes maybe a bit over it; however, I believe the Yankee is the only one who proudly claims to do so. It's definitely not easy to provide a clear and fair portrayal of a Yankee; if you hear about him from a Virginian, you'll think he's a devil: if you listen to him describe himself, you might imagine him a god—though a slippery one; Mercury turned virtuous and impressive. Matthews did well as far as “I expect,” “I calculate,” and “I guess,” but that's just the surface; there's a lot more underneath, both sweet and bitter. In sharpness, caution, hard work, and determination, he resembles the Scots; in habits of careful neatness, he resembles the Dutch; in his love for profit, he closely resembles the sons of Abraham; but in openly admitting and incredibly admiring all his unique traits, he is like nothing on earth but himself.
The Quakers have been celebrated for the pertinacity with which they avoid giving a direct answer, but what Quaker could ever vie with a Yankee in this sort of fencing? Nothing, in fact, can equal their skill in evading a question, excepting that with which they set about asking one. I am afraid that in repeating a conversation which I overheard on board the Erie canal boat, I shall spoil it, by forgetting some of the little delicate doublings which delighted me—yet I wrote it down immediately. Both parties were Yankees, but strangers to each other; one of them having, by gentle degrees, made himself pretty well acquaninted with the point from which every one on board had started, and that for which he was bound, at last attacked his brother Reynard thus:-
The Quakers are known for their persistence in avoiding a direct answer, but which Quaker could ever match a Yankee in this type of back-and-forth? Nothing really compares to their skill in dodging a question, except for the way they approach asking one. I’m worried that when I share a conversation I overheard on the Erie canal boat, I’ll ruin it by forgetting some of the little subtle nuances that amused me—yet I jotted it down right away. Both people involved were Yankees but didn’t know each other; one of them had gradually figured out where everyone on board had started and their destination, and finally approached his fellow traveler like this:-
“Well, now, which way may you be travelling?”
“Well, now, which way are you traveling?”
“I expect this canal runs pretty nearly west.”
“I expect this canal runs almost directly west.”
“Are you going far with it?”
"Are you taking it too far?"
“Well, now, I don’t rightly know how many miles it may be.”
“Well, I honestly don’t know how many miles it is.”
“I expect you’ll be from New York?”
"I assume you're from New York?"
“Sure enough I have been at New York, often and often.”
“Sure enough, I've been to New York many times.”
“I calculate, then, ’tis not there as you stop?”
“I guess, then, it's not there when you stop?”
“Business must be minded, in stopping and in stirring.”
“Business needs to be managed, both in times of pause and in times of action.”
“You may say that. Well, I look then you’ll be making for the Springs?”
“You might say that. So, I’m guessing you’ll be heading to the Springs?”
“Folks say as all the world is making for the Springs, and I except a good sight of them is.”
“People say that everyone is heading to the Springs, and I expect a lot of them are.”
“Do you calculate upon stopping long when you get to your journey’s end?”
“Do you plan to stay for a while when you reach your destination?”
“’Tis my business must settle that, I expect?”
“Is it my responsibility to take care of that, I assume?”
“I guess that’s true, too; but you’ll be for making pleasure a business for once, I calculate?”
“I guess that's true, too; but you'll actually make pleasure a business for once, right?”
“My business don’t often lie in that line.”
“My business doesn’t usually involve that.”
“Then, may be, it is not the Springs as takes you this line?”
“Then, maybe it’s not the Springs that takes you this line?”
“The Springs is a right elegant place, I reckon.”
“The Springs is a pretty fancy place, I think.”
“It is your health, I calculate, as makes you break your good rules?”
“It’s your health, I guess, that’s making you break your good habits?”
“My health don’t trouble me much, I guess.”
"My health doesn't bother me too much, I suppose."
“No? Why that’s well. How is the markets, sir? Are bread stuffs up?”
“No? Oh, that's good. How's the market, sir? Are bread prices up?”
“I a’nt just capable to say.”
"I can't really say."
“A deal of money’s made by just looking after the article at the fountain’s head.”
“A lot of money is made by just taking care of the source.”
“You may say that.”
"Sure, you can say that."
“Do you look to be making great dealings in produce up the country?”
“Are you planning to make big deals in produce upstate?”
“Why that, I expect, is difficult to know.”
“Why that is, I guess, hard to figure out.”
“I calculate you’ll find the markets changeable these times?”
“I guess you’ll find the markets are pretty unpredictable these days?”
“No markets ben’t very often without changing.”
“No markets aren’t very often without changing.”
“Why, that’s right down true. What may be your biggest article of produce?”
“Yeah, that’s totally true. What’s your biggest product?”
“I calculate, generally, that’s the biggest, as I makes most by.”
"I figure that's the biggest since it's what I make the most with."
“You may say that. But what do you chiefly call your most particular branch?”
“You might say that. But what do you mainly call your specific area of expertise?”
“Why, that’s what I can’t justly say.”
“Honestly, I can't really say that.”
And so they went on, without advancing or giving an inch, ’till I was weary of listening; but I left them still at it, when I stepped out to resume my station on a trunk at the bow of the boat, where I scribbled in my note-book this specimen of Yankee conversation.
And so they kept going, without making any progress or backing down, until I got tired of listening; but I left them still talking when I stepped out to take my place on a trunk at the front of the boat, where I jotted down in my notebook this example of Yankee conversation.
The Erie canal has cut through much solid rock, and we often passed between magnificent cliffs. The little falls of the Mohawk form a lovely scene; the rocks over which the river runs are most fantastic in form. The fall continues nearly a mile, and a beautiful village, called the Little Falls, overhangs it. As many locks occur at this point, we quitted the boat, that we might the better enjoy the scenery, which is of the widest description. Several other passengers did so likewise, and I was much amused by one of our Yankees, who very civilly accompanied our party, pointing out to me the wild state of the country, and apologizing for it, by saying, that the property all round thereabouts had been owned by an Englishman; “and you’ll excuse me, ma’am, but when the English gets a spot of wild ground like this here, they have no notions about it like us; but the Englishman have sold it, and if you was to see it five years hence, you would not know it again; I’ll engage there will be by that, half a score elegant factories—’tis a true shame to let such a privilege of water lie idle.”
The Erie Canal has cut through a lot of solid rock, and we often passed between stunning cliffs. The little falls of the Mohawk create a beautiful scene; the rocks the river flows over are incredibly unique in shape. The falls continue for nearly a mile, and a charming village called the Little Falls overlooks it. Since there are many locks here, we decided to leave the boat to better enjoy the scenery, which is quite expansive. Several other passengers did the same, and I was entertained by one of our fellow travelers, who kindly joined our group and pointed out the wildness of the area, apologizing for it by saying that the land all around used to belong to an Englishman; “and you’ll excuse me, ma’am, but when the English get a piece of wild land like this, they don’t appreciate it like we do; but the Englishman sold it, and if you were to see it in five years, you wouldn’t recognize it; I bet there will be at least a dozen fancy factories there—it's a real shame to let such a valuable water source go to waste.”
We reached Utica at twelve o’clock the following day, pretty well fagged by the sun by day, and a crowded cabin by night; lemon-juice and iced-water (without sugar) kept us alive. But for this delightful recipe, feather fans, and eau de Cologne, I think we should have failed altogether; the thermometer stood at 90 degrees.
We arrived in Utica at noon the next day, pretty worn out from the sun during the day and a packed cabin at night; lemon juice and iced water (no sugar) kept us going. Without this refreshing mixture, feather fans, and cologne, I think we would have struggled altogether; the thermometer was at 90 degrees.
At two, we set off in a very pleasant airy carriage for Trenton Falls, a delightful drive of fourteen miles. These falls have become within the last few years only second in fame to Niagara. The West Canada Creek, which in the map shows but as a paltry stream, has found its way through three miles of rock, which, at many points, is 150 feet high. A forest of enormous cedars is on their summit; and many of that beautiful species of white cedar which droops its branches like the weeping-willow grow in the clefts of the rock, and in some places almost dip their dark foliage in the torrent. The rock is of a dark grey limestone, and often presents a wall of unbroken surface. Near the hotel a flight of very alarming steps leads down to the bed of the stream, and on reaching it you find yourself enclosed in a deep abyss of solid rock, with no visible opening but that above your head. The torrent dashes by with inconceivable rapidity; its colour is black as night, and the dark ledge of rock on which you stand, is so treacherously level with it, that nothing warns you of danger. Within the last three years two young people, though surrounded by their friends, have stepped an inch too far, and disappeared from among them, as if by magic, never to revisit earth again. This broad flat ledge reached but a short distance, and then the perpendicular wall appears to stop your farther progress; but there is a spirit of defiance in the mind of man; he will not be stayed either by rocks or waves. By the aid of gunpowder a sufficient quantity of the rock has been removed to afford a fearful footing round a point, which, when doubled, discloses a world of cataracts, all leaping forward together in most magnificent confusion. I suffered considerably before I reached the spot where this grand scene is visible; a chain firmly fastened to the rock serves to hang by, as you creep along the giddy verge, and this enabled me to proceed so far; but here the chain failed, and my courage with it, though the rest of the party continued for some way farther, and reported largely of still increasing sublimity. But my knees tottered, and my head swam, so while the rest crept onward, I sat down to wait their return on the floor of rock which had received us on quitting the steps.
At two, we set off in a very nice open carriage for Trenton Falls, a lovely drive of fourteen miles. These falls have become, in recent years, only second in fame to Niagara. The West Canada Creek, which on the map looks like a small stream, has carved its way through three miles of rock, which, at many points, is 150 feet high. A forest of massive cedars tops the cliffs, and many beautiful white cedars, which droop their branches like weeping willows, grow in the rock crevices and almost dip their dark leaves into the rushing waters. The rock is a dark gray limestone and often presents a wall of unbroken surface. Near the hotel, a steep and alarming flight of steps leads down to the stream bed, and when you reach it, you find yourself in a deep chasm of solid rock, with no visible exit except the opening above your head. The torrent rushes by with incredible speed; its color is as black as night, and the dark ledge of rock where you stand is so dangerously level with it that nothing warns you of the danger. In the last three years, two young people, despite being surrounded by friends, stepped just an inch too far and vanished from sight, as if by magic, never to be seen again. This broad flat ledge extends only a short distance before the sheer wall seems to block your way; but there’s a spirit of defiance in human nature; we won’t be restrained by rocks or waves. With the help of gunpowder, enough of the rock has been removed to provide a treacherous path around a point, which, once navigated, reveals a stunning display of waterfalls, all leaping forward in magnificent chaos. I struggled quite a bit before reaching the spot where this breathtaking scene becomes visible; a chain securely attached to the rock allows you to hold on as you carefully move along the dizzying edge, and this helped me go a little further; but here the chain stopped, and so did my courage, although the rest of the group continued a bit farther and reported even more incredible views. But my knees felt weak, and my head was spinning, so while the others crept onward, I decided to sit and wait for their return on the rocky floor where we landed after coming down the steps.
A hundred and fifty feet of bare black rock on one side, an equal height covered with solemn cedars on the other, an unfathomed torrent roaring between them, the fresh remembrance of the ghastly legend belonging to the spot, and the idea of my children clinging to the dizzy path I had left, was altogether sombre enough; but I had not sat long before a tremendous burst of thunder shook the air; the deep chasm answered from either side, again, again, and again; I thought the rock I sat upon trembled: but the whole effect was so exceedingly grand, that I had no longer leisure to think of fear; my children immediately returned, and we enjoyed together the darkening shadows cast over the abyss, the rival clamour of the torrent and the storm, and that delightful exaltation of the spirits which sets danger at defiance. A few heavy rain drops alarmed us more than all the terrors of the spot, or rather, they recalled our senses, and we retreated by the fearful steps, reaching our hotel unwetted and unharmed. The next morning we were again early a foot; the last night’s storm had refreshed the air, and renewed our strength. We now took a different route, and instead of descending, as before, walked through the dark forest along the cliff, sufficiently near its edge to catch fearful glimpses of the scene below. After some time the patch began to descend, and at length brought us to the Shantee, commemorated in Miss Sedgwick’s Clarence. This is by far the finest point of the falls. There is a little balcony in front of the Shantee, literally hanging over the tremendous whirlpool; though frail, it makes one fancy oneself in safety, and reminded me of the feeling with which I have stood on one side a high gate, watching a roaring bull on the other. The walls of this Shantee are literally covered with autographs, and I was inclined to join the laugh against the egotistical trifling, when one of the party discovered “Trollope, England,” amidst the innumerable scrawls. The well known characters were hailed with such delight, that I think I shall never again laugh at any one for leaving their name where it is possible a friend may find it.
A hundred and fifty feet of bare black rock on one side, an equal height covered with solemn cedars on the other, a raging torrent roaring between them, the fresh memory of the chilling legend tied to the spot, and the thought of my kids clinging to the dizzy path I had left was pretty gloomy; but I hadn’t been sitting long when a massive thunderclap shook the air; the deep chasm echoed from either side, again and again; I thought the rock I was sitting on trembled: but the whole scene was so incredibly grand that I no longer had time to feel scared; my children immediately came back, and we enjoyed the darkening shadows over the abyss, the competing sounds of the torrent and the storm, and that delightful rush of excitement that makes you feel invincible in the face of danger. A few heavy raindrops scared us more than all the terrors of the place, or rather, they snapped us back to reality, and we retreated down the scary steps, reaching our hotel dry and unhurt. The next morning we were again out early; last night’s storm had freshened the air and renewed our energy. We took a different route this time, and instead of going down like before, we walked through the dark forest along the cliff, close enough to the edge to get scary glimpses of what was below. After a while, the path started to descend, eventually leading us to the Shantee mentioned in Miss Sedgwick’s *Clarence*. This is by far the best viewpoint of the falls. There’s a little balcony in front of the Shantee, literally hanging over the massive whirlpool; although it seems fragile, it makes you feel safe, reminding me of the time I stood beside a high gate, watching a roaring bull on the other side. The walls of this Shantee are literally covered with autographs, and I was tempted to join in the laughter at the self-absorbed silliness when one of the group spotted “Trollope, England,” among the countless scribbles. The well-known names were greeted with such joy that I don’t think I’ll ever mock anyone for leaving their name where a friend might find it.
We returned to Utica to dinner, and found that we must either wait till the next day for the Rochester coach, or again submit to the packet-boat. Our impatience induced us to prefer the latter, not very wisely, I think, for every annoyance seemed to increase upon us. The Oneida and the Genesee country are both extremely beautiful, but had we not returned by another route we should have known little about it. From the canal nothing is seen to advantage, and very little is seen at all. My chief amusement, I think, was derived from names. One town, consisting of a whiskey store and a warehouse, is called Port Byron. At Rome, the first name I saw over a store was Remus, doing infinite honour, I thought, to the classic lore of his godfathers and godmothers; but it would be endless to record all the drolleries of this kind which we met with. We arrived at Rochester, a distance of a hundred and forty miles, on the second morning after leaving Utica, fully determined never to enter a canal boat again, at least, not in America.
We returned to Utica for dinner and realized we had to either wait for the Rochester coach the next day or take the packet boat again. Our impatience led us to choose the latter option, which wasn’t very smart, since it only seemed to complicate things more. The areas around Oneida and Genesee are both really beautiful, but if we hadn’t taken a different route back, we wouldn’t have seen much of it. From the canal, not much is visible, and what you can see isn’t very appealing. I think the main thing that entertained me was the names. One town, which only had a whiskey store and a warehouse, was named Port Byron. In Rome, the first name I saw over a store was Remus, which I thought was a nice nod to the classic education of the owners; but it would take too long to list all the amusing names we encountered. We arrived in Rochester, 140 miles away, on the second morning after leaving Utica, completely determined never to set foot in a canal boat again, at least not in America.
Rochester is one of the most famous of the cities built on the Jack and Bean-stalk principle. There are many splendid edifices in wood; and certainly more houses, warehouses, factories, and steam-engines than ever were collected together in the same space of time; but I was told by a fellow-traveller that the stumps of the forest are still to be found firmly rooted in the cellars.
Rochester is one of the most well-known cities built on the Jack and Beanstalk concept. There are many impressive wooden buildings, and definitely more houses, warehouses, factories, and steam engines than have ever been gathered in such a short time; however, a fellow traveler told me that the remnants of the forest can still be found securely planted in the cellars.
The fall of the Genesee is close to the town, and in the course of a few months will, perhaps, be in the middle of it. It is a noble sheet of water, of a hundred and sixty feet perpendicular fall; but I looked at it through the window of a factory, and as I did not like that, I was obligingly handed to the door-way of a sawing-mill; in short, “the great water privilege” has been so ingeniously taken advantage of, that no point can be found where its voice and its movement are not mixed and confounded with those of the “admirable machinery of this flourishing city.”
The Genesee Falls is close to town and will likely be in the center of it in a few months. It's a stunning body of water with a drop of one hundred and sixty feet. However, I viewed it through the window of a factory, and since I wasn't a fan of that, I was kindly directed to the doorway of a sawmill. In short, "the great water privilege" has been so cleverly utilized that there's no place where its sound and movement aren't blended and confused with the "admirable machinery of this thriving city."
The Genesee fall is renowned as being the last and fatal leap of the adventurous madman, Sam Patch; he had leaped it once before, and rose to the surface of the river in perfect safety, but the last time he was seen to falter as he took the leap, and was never heard of more. It seems that he had some misgivings of his fate, for a pet bear, which he had always taken with him on his former break-neck adventures, and which had constantly leaped after him without injury, he on this occasion left behind, in the care of a friend, to whom he bequeathed him “in case of his not returning.” We saw the bear, which is kept at the principal hotel; he is a noble creature, and more completely tame than I ever saw any animal of the species.
The Genesee Falls is famous as the final and fatal jump of the daring daredevil, Sam Patch; he had jumped it once before and surfaced safely, but the last time he hesitated before leaping and was never seen again. It seems he had some doubts about what would happen, as he left his pet bear, which he usually took along on his previous death-defying adventures and which always jumped after him without getting hurt, with a friend this time, telling him to look after the bear “in case he didn’t return.” We saw the bear, which is kept at the main hotel; he is a magnificent creature and more completely tame than any animal of that kind I’ve ever seen.
Our journey now became wilder every step, the unbroken forest often skirted the road for miles, and the sight of a log-hut was an event. Yet the road was, for the greater part of the day, good, running along a natural ridge, just wide enough for it. This ridge is a very singular elevation, and, by all the enquiry I could make, the favourite theory concerning it is, that it was formerly the boundary of Lake Ontario, near which it passes. When this ridge ceased, the road ceased too, and for the rest of the way to Lockport, we were most painfully jumbled and jolted over logs and through bogs, till every joint was nearly dislocated.
Our journey became more intense with every step; the dense forest often hugged the road for miles, and spotting a log cabin was a big deal. However, for most of the day, the road was in decent shape, following a natural ridge that was just wide enough for it. This ridge is quite an unusual elevation, and from all the research I could do, the popular theory is that it used to be the shoreline of Lake Ontario, which is nearby. Once this ridge ended, the road did too, and for the rest of the way to Lockport, we were uncomfortably jostled over logs and through muddy areas until it felt like every joint was about to come apart.
Lockport is beyond all comparison, the strangest looking place I ever beheld. As fast as half a dozen trees were cut down, a factory was raised up; stumps still contest the ground with pillars, and porticos are seen to struggle with rocks. It looks as if the demon of machinery, having invaded the peaceful realms of nature, had fixed on Lockport as the battle-ground on which they should strive for mastery. The fiend insists that the streams should go one way, though the gentle mother had ever led their dancing steps another; nay, the very rocks must fall before him, and take what form he wills. The battle is lost and won. Nature is fairly routed and driven from the field, and the rattling, crackling, hissing, spitting demon has taken possession of Lockport for ever.
Lockport is unlike any place I've ever seen. As soon as a few trees were cut down, a factory popped up; stumps still compete with pillars for space, and porticos are struggling against rocks. It seems like the spirit of machinery, having invaded the peaceful areas of nature, chose Lockport as the battleground for dominance. The force insists that the streams flow one way, even though the gentle mother nature has always guided their meandering paths another; indeed, even the rocks must yield to it and take whatever shape it demands. The battle is both won and lost. Nature has been thoroughly defeated and pushed aside, and the clattering, crackling, hissing, and spitting spirit has claimed Lockport forever.
We slept there, dismally enough. I never felt more out of humour at what the Americans call improvement; it is, in truth, as it now stands, a most hideous place, and gladly did I leave it behind me.
We slept there, which was pretty miserable. I’ve never felt more frustrated with what Americans call progress; honestly, as it is now, it's a really ugly place, and I was really happy to leave it behind.
Our next stage was to Lewiston; for some miles before we reached it we were within sight of the British frontier; and we made our salaams.
Our next stop was Lewiston; for several miles before we got there, we could see the British border, and we paid our respects.
The monument of the brave General Brock stands on an elevated point near Queenstown, and is visible at a great distance.
The monument of the brave General Brock stands on a high point near Queenstown and can be seen from far away.
We breakfasted at Lewiston, but felt every cup of coffee as a sin, so impatient were we, as we approached the end of our long pilgrimage, to reach the shrine, which nature seems to have placed at such a distance from her worshippers on purpose to try the strength of their devotion.
We had breakfast in Lewiston, but every cup of coffee felt like a sin because we were so eager, as we neared the end of our long journey, to reach the shrine. It seemed like nature intentionally placed it far away to test the strength of our devotion.
A few miles more would bring us to the high altar, but first we had to cross the ferry, for we were determined upon taking our first view from British ground. The Niagara river is very lovely here; the banks are bold, rugged, and richly coloured, both by rocks and woods; and the stream itself is bright, clear, and unspeakably green.
A few more miles would take us to the high altar, but first we needed to cross the ferry because we were set on getting our first view from British soil. The Niagara River is beautiful here; the banks are steep, rugged, and vibrant with colors from the rocks and trees; and the water itself is bright, clear, and an incredible shade of green.
In crossing the ferry a fellow-passenger made many enquiries of the young boatman respecting the battle of Queenstown; he was but a lad, and could remember little about it, but he was a British lad, and his answers smacked strongly of his loyal British feeling. Among other things, the questioner asked if many American citizens had not been thrown from the heights into the river.
While crossing the ferry, a fellow passenger asked the young boatman a lot of questions about the battle of Queenstown. He was just a kid and could hardly remember anything about it, but being British, his responses definitely reflected his strong loyalty. One of the questions the passenger asked was whether many American citizens had been thrown from the heights into the river.
“Why, yes, there was a good many of them; but it was right to show them there was water between us, and you know it might help to keep the rest of them from coming to trouble us on our own ground.”
“Yeah, there were quite a few of them; but it was important to show them there was a barrier between us, and you know it might help keep the others from coming to cause us trouble on our own turf.”
This phrase, “our own ground,” gave interest to every mile, or I believe I should have shut my eyes, and tried to sleep, that I might annihilate what remained of time and space between me and Niagara.
This phrase, “our own ground,” made every mile more interesting, or I think I would have just closed my eyes and tried to sleep to escape what little time and space was left between me and Niagara.
But I was delighted to see British oaks, and British roofs, and British boys and girls. These latter, as if to impress upon us that they were not citizens, made bows and courtseys as we passed, and this little touch of long unknown civility produced great effect. “See these dear children, mamma! do they not look English? how I love them!” was the exclamation it produced.
But I was thrilled to see British oaks, British rooftops, and British boys and girls. The kids, almost as if to remind us that they weren’t citizens, bowed and curtsied as we walked by, and this small gesture of long-lost politeness had a big impact. “Look at these lovely children, mom! Don’t they look so English? I just adore them!” was the reaction it sparked.
CHAPTER XXXIII
Niagara—Arrival at Forsythes—First sight of the Falls—Goat Island—The Rapids—Buffalo—Lake Erie—Canandaigna—Stage-coach adventures
Niagara—Arriving at Forsythes—First view of the Falls—Goat Island—The Rapids—Buffalo—Lake Erie—Canandaigua—Stagecoach adventures
At length we reached Niagara. It was the brightest day that June could give; and almost any day would have seemed bright that brought me to the object, which for years, I had languished to look upon.
At last, we arrived at Niagara. It was the sunniest day that June could offer; and practically any day would have felt bright that brought me to the sight I had longed to see for years.
We did not hear the sound of the Falls till very near the hotel, which overhangs them; as you enter the door you see behind the hall an open space surrounded by galleries, one above another, and in an instant you feel that from thence the wonder is visible.
We didn't hear the sound of the Falls until we were close to the hotel, which overlooks them. As you step through the door, you see an open area behind the hall, surrounded by galleries stacked on top of each other, and in an instant, you realize that the view from there is breathtaking.
I trembled like a fool, and my girls clung to me, trembling too, I believe, but with faces beaming with delight. We encountered a waiter who had a sympathy of some sort with us, for he would not let us run through the hall to the first gallery, but ushered us up stairs, and another instant placed us where, at one glance, I saw all I had wished for, hoped for, dreamed of.
I shook like an idiot, and my girls clung to me, shaking too, I think, but their faces were shining with excitement. We met a waiter who felt some kind of sympathy for us, because he didn't let us rush through the hall to the first gallery; instead, he guided us upstairs, and in no time at all, he had us in a spot where, with one look, I saw everything I had wanted, hoped for, and dreamed about.
It is not for me to attempt a description of Niagara; I feel I have no powers for it.
It’s not my place to try to describe Niagara; I feel I don’t have the ability to do so.
After one long, stedfast gaze, we quitted the gallery that we might approach still nearer, and in leaving the house had the good fortune to meet an English gentleman,[11] who had been introduced to us at New York; he had preceded us by a few days, and knew exactly how and where to lead us. If any man living can describe the scene we looked upon it is himself, and I trust he will do it. As for myself, I can only say, that wonder, terror, and delight completely overwhelmed me. I wept with a strange mixture of pleasure and of pain, and certainly was, for some time, too violently affected in the physique to be capable of much pleasure; but when this emotion of the senses subsided, and I had recovered some degree of composure, my enjoyment was very great indeed.
After one long, steady gaze, we left the gallery to get even closer, and as we exited the building, we were fortunate to run into an English gentleman, [11], who had been introduced to us in New York. He had arrived a few days before us and knew exactly how and where to guide us. If anyone can accurately describe the scene we were witnessing, it’s him, and I hope he will. As for me, I can only say that wonder, fear, and joy completely overwhelmed me. I cried with a strange mix of pleasure and pain and was definitely too shaken up for a while to enjoy much. But once that intense emotional experience faded and I regained some composure, my enjoyment was truly immense.
To say that I was not disappointed is but a weak expression to convey the surprise and astonishment which this long dreamed of scene produced. It has to me something beyond its vastness; there is a shadowy mystery hangs about it which neither the eye nor even the imagination can penetrate; but I dare not dwell on this, it is a dangerous subject, and any attempt to describe the sensations produced must lead direct to nonsense.
To say I wasn't disappointed barely captures the surprise and amazement that this long-dreamed-of scene brought me. It has something more than just its size; there's a mysterious shadow around it that neither sight nor even imagination can fully understand. But I shouldn't linger on this—it’s a risky topic, and any effort to describe the feelings it evokes will likely end in nonsense.
Exactly at the Fall, it is the Fall and nothing else you have to look upon; there are not, as at Trenton, mighty rocks and towering forests, there is only the waterfall; but it is the fall of an ocean, and were Pelion piled on Ossa on either side of it, we could not look at them.
Exactly at the Fall, it is just the Fall and nothing else you have to see; there are not, like at Trenton, huge rocks and towering forests, there is only the waterfall; but it is the fall of an ocean, and even if Pelion were stacked on Ossa on either side of it, we could not focus on them.
The noise is greatly less than I expected; one can hear with perfect distinctness everything said in an ordinary tone, when quite close to the cataract. The cause of this, I imagine to be, that it does not fall immediately among rocks, like the far noisier Potomac, but direct and unbroken, save by its own rebound. The colour of the water, before this rebound hides it in foam and mist, is of the brightest and most delicate green; the violence of the impulse sends it far over the precipice before it falls, and the effect of the ever varying light through its transparency is, I think, the loveliest thing I ever looked upon.
The noise is much less than I expected; you can clearly hear everything said in a normal voice when you’re close to the waterfall. I think this is because it doesn’t crash down on rocks like the much louder Potomac, but flows directly and smoothly, only disrupted by its own splashback. The color of the water, before it gets covered in foam and mist, is a bright and delicate green; the force of the water pushes it far over the edge before it falls, and the effect of the constantly changing light through its clarity is, in my opinion, the most beautiful thing I’ve ever seen.
We descended to the edge of the gulf which received the torrent, and thence looked at the horse-shoe fall in profile; it seems like awful daring to stand close beside it, and raise one’s eyes to its immensity. I think the point the most utterly inconceivable to those who have not seen it, is the centre of the horse-shoe. The force of the torrent converges there, and as the heavy mass pours in, twisted, wreathed, and curled together, it gives an idea of irresistible power, such as no other object ever conveyed to me.
We went down to the edge of the gulf that catches the waterfall and looked at the horseshoe fall from the side. It feels incredibly daring to stand right next to it and look up at its size. The most unbelievable part for those who haven’t seen it is the center of the horseshoe. The power of the water converges there, and as the heavy mass pours in, twisted, wreathed, and curled together, it gives a sense of unstoppable force that I've never experienced with anything else.
The following anecdote, which I had from good authority, may give some notion of this mighty power.
The following story, which I heard from a reliable source, might give you an idea of this incredible power.
After the last American war, three of our ships stationed on Lake Erie were declared unfit for service, and condemned. Some of their officers obtained permission to send them over Niagara Falls. The first was torn to shivers by the rapids, and went over in fragments; the second filled with water before she reached the fall; but the third, which was in better condition, took the leap gallantly, and retained her form till it was hid in the cloud of mist below. A reward of ten dollars was offered for the largest fragment of wood that should be found from either wreck, five for the second, and so on. One morsel only was ever seen, and that about a foot in length, was mashed as by a vice, and its edges notched like the teeth of a saw. What had become of the immense quantity of wood which had been precipitated? What unknown whirlpool had engulphed it, so that, contrary to the very laws of nature, no vestige of the floating material could find its way to the surface?
After the last American war, three of our ships stationed on Lake Erie were declared unfit for service and condemned. Some of their officers got permission to send them over Niagara Falls. The first was torn to shreds by the rapids and went over in pieces; the second filled with water before it reached the fall; but the third, which was in better condition, took the plunge bravely and kept its shape until it disappeared in the mist below. A reward of ten dollars was offered for the largest piece of wood found from either wreck, five for the second largest, and so on. Only one piece was ever seen, and that, about a foot long, was crushed like it was in a vice, with edges notched like a saw. What happened to the huge amount of wood that was lost? What unknown whirlpool swallowed it up, so that, against all laws of nature, no trace of the floating debris could make it to the surface?
Beyond the horse-shoe is Goat Island, and beyond Goat Island the American fall, bold, straight, and chafed to snowy whiteness by the rocks which meet it; but it does not approach, in sublimity or awful beauty, to the wondrous crescent on the other shore. There, the form of the mighty cauldron, into which the deluge poors, the hundred silvery torrents congregating round its verge, the smooth and solemn movement with which it rolls its massive volume over the rock, the liquid emerald of its long unbroken waters, the fantastic wreaths which spring to meet it, and then, the shadowy mist that veils the horrors of its crash below, constitute a scene almost too enormous in its features for man to look upon. “Angels might tremble as they gazed;” and I should deem the nerves obtuse, rather than strong, which did not quail at the first sight of this stupendous cataract.
Beyond the horseshoe shape is Goat Island, and past Goat Island is the American falls, bold, straight, and frothy white from the rocks that meet it; but it doesn’t compare, in grandeur or terrifying beauty, to the stunning crescent on the opposite shore. There, the shape of the enormous basin, where the deluge pours in, the hundreds of silvery streams gathering around its edge, the smooth and serious flow with which it rolls its massive volume over the rock, the liquid emerald of its long uninterrupted waters, the whimsical curls that rise to greet it, and then, the shadowy mist that hides the terrifying crash below, create a scene almost too vast in its features for anyone to take in. “Angels might tremble as they gazed;” and I would think the nerves are dull, rather than strong, that don’t shudder at the first sight of this breathtaking waterfall.
Minute local particulars can be of no interest to those who have not felt their influence for pleasure or for pain. I will not tell of giddy stairs which scale the very edge of the torrent, nor of beetling slabs of table rock, broken and breaking, on which, shudder as you may, you must take your stand or lose your reputation as a tourist. All these feats were performed again and again even on the first day of our arrival, and most earthly weary was I when the day was done, though I would not lose the remembrance of it to purchase the addition of many soft and silken ones to my existence.
Minute local details can’t mean much to those who haven’t experienced their impact, whether for joy or for sorrow. I won’t describe the dizzying stairs that rise right along the edge of the rushing water, or the steep slabs of rock that, despite how much they make you cringe, you have to stand on to avoid losing your reputation as a tourist. All of these adventures happened over and over again, even on the first day of our arrival, and I was completely exhausted by the end of the day, even though I wouldn’t trade the memory of it for countless moments of comfort and ease in my life.
By four o’clock the next morning I was again at the little shantee, close to the horse-shoe fall, which seems reared in water rather than in air, and took an early shower-bath of spray. Much is concealed at this early hour by the heavy vapour, but there was a charm in the very obscurity; and every moment, as the light increased, cloud after cloud rolled off, till the vast wonder was again before me.
By four o'clock the next morning, I was back at the little cabin near the horseshoe falls, which look like they're rising from the water instead of the air, and I got an early shower of mist. A lot is hidden at this hour by the thick fog, but there’s something enchanting in that mystery; as the light grew, clouds kept lifting until the great spectacle was right in front of me again.
It is in the afternoon that the rainbow is visible from the British side; and it is a lovely feature in the mighty landscape. The gay arch springs from fall to fall, a fairy bridge.
It’s in the afternoon that the rainbow can be seen from the British side, and it’s a beautiful sight in the grand landscape. The colorful arc stretches from waterfall to waterfall like a magical bridge.
After breakfast we crossed to the American side, and explored Goat Island. The passage across the Niagara, directly in face of the falls, is one of the most delightful little voyages imaginable; the boat crosses marvellously near them, and within reach of a light shower of spray. Real safety and apparent danger have each their share in the pleasure felt. The river is here two hundred feet deep. The passage up the rock brings you close upon the American cataract; it is a vast sheet, and has all the sublimity that height and width, and uproar can give; but it has none of the magic of its rival about it. Goat Island has, at all points, a fine view of the rapids; the furious velocity with which they rush onward to the abyss is terrific; and the throwing a bridge across them was a work of noble daring.
After breakfast, we crossed over to the American side and explored Goat Island. The trip across Niagara, right in front of the falls, is one of the most enjoyable short journeys you can imagine; the boat gets incredibly close, allowing you to feel a light spray. There’s a mix of real safety and apparent danger that adds to the thrill. The river here is about two hundred feet deep. Climbing up the rocks brings you right next to the American falls; it’s a massive sheet of water that offers all the grandeur that height, width, and noise can provide, but it doesn't have the same magic as its counterpart. Goat Island offers great views of the rapids from all angles; the intense speed at which they rush toward the drop is terrifying, and building a bridge across them was a bold feat.
Below the falls, the river runs between lofty rocks, crowned with unbroken forests; this scene forms a striking contrast to the level shores above the cataract. It appears as if the level of the river had been broken up by some volcanic force. The Niagara flows out of Lake Erie, a broad, deep river; but for several miles its course is tranquil, and its shores perfectly level. By degrees its bed begins to sink, and the glassy smoothness is disturbed by a slight ripple. The inverted trees, that before lay so softly still upon its bosom, become twisted and tortured till they lose their form, and seem madly to mix in the tumult that destroys them. The current becomes more rapid at every step, till rock after rock has chafed the stream to fury, making the green one white. This lasts for a mile, and then down sink the rocks at once, one hundred and fifty feet, and the enormous flood falls after them. God said, let there be a cataract, and it was so. When the river has reached its new level, the precipice on either side shows a terrific chasm of solid rock; some beautiful plants are clinging to its sides, and oak, ash, and cedar, in many places, clothe their terrors with rich foliage.
Below the falls, the river flows between towering rocks topped with dense forests; this scene creates a striking contrast to the flat shores above the waterfall. It looks as if some volcanic force had disrupted the river's flow. The Niagara River flows out of Lake Erie, a broad, deep river; for several miles, its journey is peaceful, and its banks are perfectly level. Gradually, its bed begins to drop, and the smooth surface is disturbed by a gentle ripple. The upside-down trees that once lay elegantly on its surface become twisted and distorted until they lose their shape, seemingly caught up in the chaos that overwhelms them. The current speeds up with each passing moment, until rocks fray the stream into a frenzy, turning the green water white. This continues for a mile, and then the rocks suddenly drop one hundred and fifty feet, with the massive flow following right behind. God said, let there be a waterfall, and it was so. When the river reaches its new level, the cliffs on either side reveal a terrifying chasm of solid rock; some beautiful plants cling to the sides, and oak, ash, and cedar trees, in many areas, cover the steepness with lush foliage.
This violent transition from level shores to a deep ravine, seems to indicate some great convulsion as its cause, and when I heard of a burning spring close by, I fancied the volcanic power still at work, and that the wonders of the region might yet increase.
This sudden shift from flat beaches to a deep gorge suggests some major upheaval as its cause, and when I learned about a hot spring nearby, I imagined the volcanic activity was still ongoing, and that the marvels of the area might still grow.
We passed four delightful days of excitement and fatigue; we drenched ourselves in spray; we cut our feet on the rocks; we blistered our faces in the sun; we looked up the cataract, and down the cataract; we perched ourselves on every pinnacle we could find; we dipped our fingers in the flood at a few yards’ distance from its thundering fall; in short, we strove to fill as many niches of memory with Niagara as possible; and I think the images will be within the power of recall for ever.
We spent four amazing days full of thrills and exhaustion; we soaked ourselves in mist; we scraped our feet on the rocks; we burned our faces in the sun; we looked up at the waterfall, and down at the waterfall; we climbed onto every peak we could find; we dipped our fingers into the rushing water just a few yards away from its roaring drop; in short, we tried to capture as many memories of Niagara as we could; and I believe those images will stay with me forever.
We met many groups of tourists in our walks, chiefly American, but they were, or we fancied they were, but little observant of the wonders around them.
We encountered many groups of tourists during our walks, mostly Americans, but they seemed, or at least we thought they seemed, to pay little attention to the amazing sights around them.
One day we were seated on a point of the cliff, near the ferry, which commands a view of both the Falls. This, by the way, is considered as the finest general view of the scene. One of our party was employed in attempting to sketch, what, however, I believe it is impossible for any pencil to convey an idea of to those who have not seen it. We had borrowed two or three chairs from a neighbouring cottage, and amongst us had gathered a quantity of boughs which, with the aid of shawls and parasols, we had contrived to weave into a shelter from the midday sun, so that altogether I have no doubt we looked very cool and comfortable.
One day we were sitting on a ledge of the cliff near the ferry, which offers a view of both Falls. By the way, this is considered the best overall view of the scene. One person in our group was trying to sketch, but honestly, I don't think any drawing could capture it for those who haven't seen it. We had borrowed a couple of chairs from a nearby cottage, and we had gathered a bunch of branches which, along with shawls and parasols, we managed to weave into a shelter from the midday sun. All in all, I’m sure we looked really cool and comfortable.
A large party who had crossed from the American side, wound up the steep ascent from the place where the boat had left them; in doing so their backs were turned to the cataracts, and as they approached the summit, our party was the principal object before them. They all stood perfectly still to look at us. This first examination was performed at the distance of about a dozen yard from the spot we occupied, and lasted about five minutes, by which time they had recovered breath, and acquired courage. They then advanced in a body, and one or two of them began to examine (wrong side upwards) the work of the sketcher, in doing which they stood precisely between him and his object; but of this I think it is very probable they were not aware. Some among them next began to question us as to how long we had been at the Falls; whether there were much company; if we were not from the old country, and the like. In return we learnt that they were just arrived; yet not one of them (there were eight) ever turned the head, even for a moment, to look at the most stupendous spectacle that nature has to show.
A large group that had crossed from the American side climbed up the steep hill where the boat had dropped them off; as they did this, their backs were turned to the waterfalls, and when they reached the top, our group was the main focus for them. They all stood completely still to stare at us. This first look lasted about five minutes from a distance of around ten yards from where we were, during which time they caught their breath and built up their courage. They then approached us as a group, and one or two of them started to look at the sketch the artist was working on, standing right between him and his subject; although it’s likely they didn't realize they were blocking his view. Some of them then began to ask us questions about how long we had been at the Falls, whether there were many people around, if we were not from the old country, and so on. In return, we learned that they had just arrived; yet not one of the eight of them even turned their head for a moment to look at the incredible sight that nature has to offer.
The company at the hotel changed almost every day. Many parties arrived in the morning, walked to the falls; returned to the hotel to dinner, and departed by the coach immediately after it. Many groups were indescribably whimsical, both in appearance and manner. Now and then a first-rate dandy shot in among us, like a falling star.
The guests at the hotel changed almost every day. Many groups arrived in the morning, visited the falls, returned to the hotel for dinner, and left by coach right after. Some groups were incredibly quirky in both looks and behavior. Occasionally, a well-dressed show-off would appear among us, like a shooting star.
On one occasion, when we were in the beautiful gallery, at the back of the hotel, which overlooks the horse-shoe fall, we saw the booted leg of one of this graceful race protruded from the window which commands the view, while his person was thrown back in his chair, and his head enveloped in a cloud of tobacco smoke.
On one occasion, when we were in the beautiful gallery at the back of the hotel overlooking the horseshoe fall, we saw the booted leg of one of these stylish people sticking out of the window that offered the view, while he was leaning back in his chair with his head surrounded by a cloud of tobacco smoke.
I have repeatedly remarked, when it has happened to me to meet any ultra fine men among the wilder and more imposing scenes of our own land, that they throw off, in a great degree, their airs, and their “townliness,” as some one cleverly calls these simagrées, as if ashamed to “play their fantastic tricks” before the god of nature, when so forcibly reminded of his presence; and more than once on these occasions I have been surprised to find how much intellect lurked behind the inane mask of fashion. But in America the effect of fine scenery upon this class of persons is different, for it is exactly when amongst it, that the most strenuous efforts at elegant nonchalance are perceptible among the young exquisites of the western world. It is true that they have little leisure for the display of grace in the daily routine of commercial activity in which their lives are passed, and this certainly offers a satisfactory explanation of the fact above stated.
I’ve often noticed that when I meet sophisticated people in the more dramatic and beautiful parts of our country, they tend to let go of their pretentiousness and “city airs,” as someone cleverly calls these simagrées, almost as if they’re embarrassed to “show off” in front of nature. More than once, I’ve been surprised to see how much intelligence hides behind the superficial mask of fashion. However, in America, the impact of beautiful scenery on these individuals is different. It’s precisely when they’re surrounded by it that the young elites of the western world make the most effort to appear casually elegant. It’s true that they have little time to show off their grace in the daily grind of commercial life, which definitely explains the situation I mentioned.
Fortunately for our enjoyment, the solemn character of the scene was but little broken in upon by these gentry. Every one who comes to Forsythe’s Hotel (except Mrs. Bogle Corbet), walks to the shantee, writes their name in a book which is kept there, and, for the most part, descends by the spiral staircase which leads from the little platform before it, to the rocks below. Here they find another shantee, but a few yards from the entrance of that wondrous cavern which is formed by the falling flood on one side, and by the mighty rock over which it pours, on the other. To this frail shelter from the wild uproar, and the blinding spray, nearly all the touring gentlemen, and even many of the pretty ladies, find their way. But here I often saw their noble daring fail, and have watched them dripping and draggled turn again to the sheltering stairs, leaving us in full possession of the awful scene we so dearly loved to gaze upon. How utterly futile must every attempt be to describe the spot! How vain every effort to convey an idea of the sensations it produces! Why is it so exquisite a pleasure to stand for hours drenched in spray, stunned by the ceaseless roar, trembling from the concussion that shakes the very rock you cling to, and breathing painfully in the moist atmosphere that seems to have less of air than water in it? Yet pleasure it is, and I almost think the greatest I ever enjoyed. We more than once approached the entrance to this appalling cavern, but I never fairly entered it, though two or three of my party did. I lost my breath entirely; and the pain at my chest was so severe, that not all my curiosity could enable me to endure it.
Fortunately for our enjoyment, the serious nature of the scene was only slightly interrupted by these folks. Everyone who visits Forsythe’s Hotel (except Mrs. Bogle Corbet) goes to the shack, writes their name in a book kept there, and usually heads down the spiral staircase that leads from the small platform out front to the rocks below. Here they find another shack, just a few yards from the entrance to that amazing cavern created by the rushing water on one side and the huge rock it cascades over on the other. Almost all the touring gentlemen, and even many of the pretty ladies, make their way here for a bit of cover from the wild noise and blinding spray. But I often saw their brave attempts fall short as they turned back, dripping and disheveled, to the safety of the stairs, leaving us to fully enjoy the breathtaking scene that we loved to watch. How completely pointless it must be to try to describe this place! How futile every effort to express the feelings it brings about! Why is it such a wonderful pleasure to stand for hours soaking wet in spray, overwhelmed by the endless roar, shaking from the vibrations that rattle the very rock you cling to, and gasping in the humid air that feels more like water than air? Yet it is pleasurable, and I almost think it’s the greatest joy I’ve ever experienced. More than once, we approached the entrance to this terrifying cavern, but I never truly entered it, although two or three members of my group did. I lost my breath completely, and the pain in my chest was so intense that not even my curiosity could make me endure it.
What was that cavern of the winds, of which we heard of old, compared to this? A mightier spirit than Aeolus reigns here.
What was that cave of winds we heard about in the past compared to this? A stronger force than Aeolus rules here.
Nor was this spot of dread and danger the only one in which we found ourselves alone. The path taken by “the company” to the shantee, which contained the “book of names” was always the same; this wound down the steep bank from the gate of the hotel garden, and was rendered tolerably easy by its repeated doublings; but it was by no means the best calculated to manage to advantage the pleasure of the stranger in his approach to the spot. All others, however, seemed left for us alone.
Nor was this spot of fear and danger the only one where we found ourselves alone. The route taken by “the company” to the shanty, which held the “book of names,” was always the same; it went down the steep bank from the entrance of the hotel garden and was made somewhat easier by its repeated bends. However, it was by no means the best way to enhance the enjoyment of the visitor as they approached the place. All other paths, though, seemed reserved just for us.
During our stay we saw the commencement of another staircase, intended to rival in attraction that at present in use; it is but a few yards from it, and can in no way, I think, contribute to the convenience of the descent. The erection of the central shaft of this spiral stair was a most tremendous operation, and made me sick and giddy as I watched it. After it had been made fast at the bottom, the carpenters swung themselves off the rocks, by the means of ropes, to the beams which traversed it; and as they sat across them, in the midst of the spray and the uproar, I thought I had never seen life periled so wantonly. But the work proceeded without accident, and was nearly finished before we left the hotel.
During our stay, we saw the beginning of another staircase, aimed at being just as attractive as the one currently in use; it's only a few yards away and, in my opinion, won't really help with the descent. Building the central shaft of this spiral staircase was a huge job, and it made me feel sick and dizzy just watching it. Once it was secured at the bottom, the carpenters swung themselves off the rocks using ropes to reach the beams across it; as they sat on those beams, surrounded by the spray and noise, I thought I had never witnessed life being put at such unnecessary risk. But the work went on without any accidents and was almost done by the time we left the hotel.
It was a sort of pang to take what we knew must be our last look at Niagara; but “we had to do it,” as the Americans say, and left it on the 10th June, for Buffalo.
It was a bit of a sting to take what we knew would be our last look at Niagara; but "we had to do it," as the Americans say, and left on June 10th for Buffalo.
The drive along the river, above the Falls, is as beautiful as a clear stream of a mile in width can make it; and the road continues close to it till you reach the ferry at Black Rock.
The drive along the river, above the Falls, is as beautiful as a clear stream a mile wide can make it; and the road stays right alongside it until you get to the ferry at Black Rock.
We welcomed, almost with a shout, the British colours which we saw, for the first time, on Commodore Barrie’s pretty sloop, the Bull Dog, which we passed as it was towing up the river to Lake Erie, the commodore being about to make a tour of the lakes.
We cheered as we saw the British flag for the first time on Commodore Barrie’s lovely sloop, the Bull Dog, as we passed it while it was being towed up the river to Lake Erie, where the commodore was about to start a tour of the lakes.
At Black Rock we crossed again into the United States, and a few miles of horrible jolting brought us to Buffalo.
At Black Rock, we crossed back into the United States, and after a few miles of terrible bouncing, we arrived in Buffalo.
Of all the thousand and one towns I saw in America, I think Buffalo is the queerest looking; it is not quite so wild as Lockport, but all the buildings have the appearance of having been run up in a hurry, though every thing has an air of great pretension; there are porticos, columns, domes, and colonnades, but all in wood. Every body tells you there, as in all their other new-born towns, and every body believes, that their improvement, and their progression, are more rapid, more wonderful, than the earth ever before witnessed; while to me, the only wonder is, how so many thousands, nay millions of persons, can be found, in the nineteenth century, who can be content so to live. Surely this country may be said to spread rather than to rise.
Of all the towns I saw in America, I think Buffalo looks the weirdest. It’s not quite as chaotic as Lockport, but all the buildings seem like they were thrown together in a rush, even though everything tries to look impressive. There are porticos, columns, domes, and colonnades, but they’re all made of wood. Everyone there, like in all their other newly established towns, insists and believes that their growth and progress are faster and more amazing than anything the world has ever seen. To me, the real wonder is how so many thousands, even millions, of people in the nineteenth century can be okay with living like this. It seems like this country is spreading out rather than actually developing.
The Eagle Hotel, an immense wooden fabric, has all the pretension of a splendid establishment, but its monstrous corridors, low ceilings, and intricate chambers, gave me the feeling of a catacomb rather than a house. We arrived after the table d’hôte tea-drinking was over, and supped comfortably enough with a gentleman, who accompanied us from the Falls: but the next morning we breakfasted in a long, low, narrow room, with a hundred persons, and any thing less like comfort can hardly be imagined.
The Eagle Hotel, a huge wooden structure, looks like a fancy place, but its huge hallways, low ceilings, and complicated rooms made me feel more like I was in a catacomb than a home. We got there after the table d’hôte tea was finished and had a decent dinner with a gentleman who came with us from the Falls. However, the next morning we had breakfast in a long, low, narrow room with a hundred people, and it was the complete opposite of comfortable.
What can induce so many intellectual citizens to prefer these long, silent tables, scantily covered with morsels of fried ham, salt fish and liver, to a comfortable loaf of bread with their wives and children at home? How greatly should I prefer eating my daily meals with my family, in an Indian wig-wam, to boarding at a table d’hôte in these capacious hotels; the custom, however, seems universal through the country, at least we have met it, without a shadow of variation as to its general features, from New Orleans to Buffalo.
What could make so many smart people choose these long, quiet tables, barely filled with bits of fried ham, salt fish, and liver, over a cozy loaf of bread with their wives and kids at home? I would much rather have my daily meals with my family in a cozy Indian hut than eat at a table d’hôte in these large hotels; however, this seems to be the norm across the country. We’ve encountered it everywhere, without any noticeable change in its basic characteristics, from New Orleans to Buffalo.
Lake Erie has no beauty to my eyes; it is not the sea, and it is not the river, nor has it the beautiful scenery generally found round smaller lakes. The only interest its unmeaning expanse gave me, arose from remembering that its waters, there so tame and tranquil, were destined to leap the gulf of Niagara. A dreadful road, through forests only beginning to be felled, brought us to Avon; it is a straggling, ugly little place, and not any of their “Romes, Carthages, Ithacas, or Athens,” ever provoked me by their name so much. This Avon flows sweetly with nothing but whiskey and tobacco juice.
Lake Erie doesn't look beautiful to me; it's not the ocean, nor is it a river, and it lacks the lovely scenery typically found around smaller lakes. The only reason I found its bland stretch interesting was because I remembered that its calm waters were on their way to crash over Niagara Falls. We took a terrible road, cutting through forests that were only just starting to be cleared, to get to Avon; it's a messy, unattractive little spot, and none of their so-called "Romes, Carthages, Ithacas, or Athens" ever annoyed me as much as this one does. This Avon runs sweetly with nothing but whiskey and tobacco spit.
The next day’s journey was much more interesting, for it showed us the lake of Canandaigua. It is about eighteen miles long, but narrow enough to bring the opposite shore, clothed with rich foliage, near to the eye; the back-ground is a ridge of mountains. Perhaps the state of the atmosphere lent an unusual charm to the scene; one of those sudden thunderstorms, so rapid in approach, and so sombre in colouring, that they change the whole aspect of things in a moment, rose over the mountains and passed across the lake while we looked upon it. Another feature in the scene gave a living, but most sad interest to it. A glaring wooden hotel, as fine as paint and porticos can make it, overhangs the lake; beside it stands a shed for cattle. To this shed, and close by the white man’s mushroom palace, two Indians had crept to seek a shelter from the storm. The one was an aged man, whose venerable head in attitude and expression indicated the profoundest melancholy: the other was a youth, and in his deep-set eye there was a quiet sadness more touching still. There they stood, the native rightful lords of the fair land, looking out upon the lovely lake which yet bore the name their fathers had given it, watching the threatening storm that brooded there; a more fearful one had already burst over them.
The next day's journey was much more interesting because it introduced us to Canandaigua Lake. It's about eighteen miles long, but narrow enough that the opposite shore, covered in lush foliage, feels close at hand; the backdrop is a ridge of mountains. Perhaps the state of the atmosphere added an unusual charm to the scene; a sudden thunderstorm, quick to appear and dark in color, changed the entire landscape in an instant, rising over the mountains and passing across the lake while we watched. Another element in the scene added a living, yet deeply sad interest. A flashy wooden hotel, as nice as paint and porches can make it, looms over the lake; next to it stands a shed for cattle. To this shed, close to the white man’s fancy hotel, two Native Americans had crept to find shelter from the storm. One was an elderly man, whose wise head and expression conveyed profound sadness; the other was a young man, and in his deep-set eyes there was an even more touching quiet sadness. There they stood, the rightful native lords of this beautiful land, gazing out at the lovely lake that still carried the name their ancestors had given it, watching the threatening storm that hovered nearby; a more fearsome one had already struck them.
Though I have mentioned the lake first, the little town of Canandaigua precedes it, in returning from the West. It is as pretty a village as ever man contrived to build. Every house is surrounded by an ample garden, and at that flowery season they were half buried in roses.
Though I mentioned the lake first, the little town of Canandaigua comes before it when coming back from the West. It's as beautiful a village as anyone has ever created. Every house has a nice garden, and during that flowery season, they were almost hidden by roses.
It is true these houses are of wood, but they are so neatly painted, in such perfect repair, and show so well within their leafy setting, that it is impossible not to admire them.
It’s true these houses are made of wood, but they’re so nicely painted, in such great shape, and look so good among the greenery that it’s hard not to admire them.
Forty-six miles farther is Geneva, beautifully situated on Seneca Lake. This, too, is a lovely sheet of water, and I think the town may rival its European namesake in beauty.
Forty-six miles further is Geneva, beautifully located on Seneca Lake. This is also a stunning body of water, and I believe the town could compete with its European namesake in beauty.
We slept at Auburn, celebrated for its prison, where the highly-approved system of American discipline originated. In this part of the country there is no want of churches; every little village has its wooden temple, and many of them too; that the Methodists and Presbyterians may not clash.
We stayed in Auburn, known for its prison, where the respected system of American discipline began. In this area, there’s no shortage of churches; every small village has its wooden place of worship, and many of them too, so that the Methodists and Presbyterians won’t come into conflict.
We passed through an Indian reserve, and the untouched forests again hung close upon the road. Repeated groups of Indians passed us, and we remarked that they were much cleaner and better dressed than those we had met wandering far from their homes. The blankets which they use so gracefully as mantles were as white as snow.
We drove through a Native American reservation, and the pristine forests once again lined the road. We encountered several groups of Indigenous people, and we noticed that they were much cleaner and better dressed than those we had seen wandering far from their homes. The blankets they wore so elegantly as capes were as white as snow.
We took advantage of the loss of a horse’s shoe, to leave the coach, and approach a large party of them, consisting of men, women, and children, who were regaling themselves with I know not what, but milk made a part of the repast. They could not talk to us, but they received us with smiles, and seemed to understand when we asked if they had mocassins to sell, for they shook their sable locks, and answered “no.” A beautiful grove of butternut trees was pointed out to us, as the spot where the chiefs of the six nations used to hold their senate; our informer told me that he had been present at several of their meetings, and though he knew but little of their language, the power of their eloquence was evident from the great effect it produced among themselves.
We took the opportunity of a horse losing its shoe to leave the coach and approach a large group of people, including men, women, and children, who were enjoying I don't know what, but milk was part of their meal. They couldn't talk to us, but they welcomed us with smiles and seemed to understand when we asked if they had moccasins for sale, as they shook their dark hair and answered "no." A beautiful grove of butternut trees was pointed out to us as the place where the chiefs of the six nations used to hold their council; the person who informed us said he had attended several of their meetings, and although he understood little of their language, the impact of their eloquence was clear from the strong effect it had on their people.
Towards the end of this day, we encountered an adventure which revived our doubts whether the invading white men, in chasing the poor Indians from their forests, have done much towards civilizing the land. For myself, I almost prefer the indigenous manner to the exotic.
Towards the end of this day, we experienced an adventure that made us question whether the invading white men, in driving the poor Indians from their forests, have really done much to civilize the land. Personally, I almost prefer the native way of life to the foreign one.
The coach stopped to take in “a lady” at Vernon; she entered, and completely filled the last vacant inch of our vehicle; for “we were eight” before.
The coach stopped to pick up “a lady” at Vernon; she got in and completely filled the last available space in our vehicle; we were already “eight” before this.
But no sooner was she seated, than her beau came forward with a most enormous wooden best-bonnet box. He paused for a while to meditate the possibilities—raised it, as if to place it on our laps—sunk it, as if to put it beneath our feet. Both alike appeared impossible; when, in true Yankee style he addressed one of our party with. If you’ll just step out a minute, I guess I’ll find room for it.”
But no sooner had she sat down than her boyfriend came up with a huge wooden bonnet box. He paused for a moment to think about the options—lifted it, as if to set it on our laps—then lowered it, as if to put it under our feet. Both options seemed impossible; then, in true Yankee fashion, he said to one of us, “If you’ll just step outside for a minute, I think I’ll find room for it.”
“Perhaps so. But how shall I find room for myself afterwards?”
“Maybe. But how will I find space for myself afterward?”
This was uttered in European accents, and in an instant half a dozen whiskey drinkers stepped from before the whiskey store, and took the part of the beau.
This was said in European accents, and in an instant, half a dozen whiskey drinkers stepped out from in front of the whiskey store and took the side of the beau.
“That’s because you’ll be English travellers I expect, but we have travelled in better countries than Europe—we have travelled in America—and the box will go, I calculate.”
“That’s because I expect you’ll be English travelers, but we’ve traveled in better places than Europe—we’ve been to America—and the box will go, I figure.”
We remonstrated on the evident injustice of the proceeding, and I ventured to say, that as we had none of us any luggage in the carriage, because the space was so very small, I thought a chance passenger could have no right so greatly to incommode us.
We protested against the obvious unfairness of what was happening, and I bravely said that since none of us had any luggage in the carriage, due to the space being so very small, I believed that a random passenger shouldn't have the right to inconvenience us so much.
“Right!—there they go—that’s just their way—that will do in Europe, may be; it sounds just like English tyranny, now don’t it? but it won’t do here.” And thereupon he began thrusting in the wooden box against our legs, with all his strength.
“Right!—there they go—that’s just their way—that will work in Europe, maybe; it sounds just like English tyranny, doesn’t it? but it won’t fly here.” And with that, he started pushing the wooden box against our legs with all his strength.
“No law, sir, can permit such conduct as this.”
“No law, sir, can allow behavior like this.”
“Law!” exclaimed a gentleman very particularly drunk, “we makes our own laws, and governs our own selves.”
“Wow!” exclaimed a guy who was clearly very drunk, “we create our own rules and govern ourselves.”
“Law!” echoed another gentleman of Vernon, “this is a free country, we have no laws here, and we don’t want no foreign power to tyrannize over us.”
“Law!” echoed another gentleman of Vernon, “this is a free country, we have no laws here, and we don’t want any foreign power to bully us.”
295
295
I give the words exactly. It is, however, but fair to state, that the party had evidently been drinking more than an usual portion of whiskey, but, perhaps, in whiskey, as in wine, truth may come to light. At any rate the people of the Western Paradise follow the Gentiles in this, that they are a law unto themselves.
I state the words exactly. However, it’s only fair to mention that the group had clearly been drinking more than their usual amount of whiskey, but maybe, like with wine, truth can be revealed in whiskey too. In any case, the people of the Western Paradise follow the Gentiles in that they consider themselves a law unto themselves.
During the contest, the coachman sat upon the box without saying a word, but seemed greatly to enjoy the joke; the question of the box, however, was finally decided in our favour by the nature of the human material, which cannot be compressed beyond a certain degree.
During the contest, the driver sat on the box without saying a word, but clearly found the situation amusing; however, the issue of the box was eventually settled in our favor by the nature of human beings, which can't be squished beyond a certain point.
For the great part of this day we had the good fortune to have a gentleman and his daughter for our fellow-travellers, who were extremely intelligent and agreeable; but I nearly got myself into a scrape by venturing to remark upon a phrase used by the gentleman, and which had met me at every corner from the time I first entered the country. We had been talking of pictures, and I had endeavoured to adhere to the rule I had laid down for myself, of saying very little, where I could say nothing agreeable. At length he named an American artist, with whose works I was very familiar, and after having declared him equal to Lawrence (judging by his portrait of West, now at New York), he added, “and what is more, madam, he is perfectly self-taught.”
For most of the day, we were lucky to have a gentleman and his daughter as our travel companions. They were both very intelligent and pleasant. However, I nearly got into trouble by commenting on a phrase the gentleman used, which I had encountered everywhere since I first arrived in the country. We were discussing paintings, and I tried to stick to my rule of saying very little when I had nothing nice to contribute. Finally, he mentioned an American artist whose work I knew quite well, and after stating that he was as good as Lawrence (based on his portrait of West, which is now in New York), he added, “And what’s more, madam, he is completely self-taught.”
I prudently took a few moments before I answered; for the equalling our immortal Lawrence to a most vile dauber stuck in my throat; I could not say Amen; so for some time I said nothing; but, at last, I remarked on the frequency with which I had heard this phrase of self-taught used, not as an apology, but as positive praise.
I took a moment before I responded because comparing our great Lawrence to a terrible painter really bothered me; I couldn’t agree with that. So, I stayed quiet for a while, but eventually, I mentioned how often I had heard the term self-taught used, not as an excuse, but as genuine praise.
“Well, madam, can there be a higher praise?”
“Well, ma'am, is there any higher praise?”
“Certainly not, if spoken of the individual merits of a person, without the means of instruction, but I do not understand it when applied as praise to his works.”
“Absolutely not, if it’s about the individual qualities of a person, without the means of teaching, but I don’t get it when it’s used as praise for his work.”
“Not understand it, madam? Is it not attributing genius to the author, and what is teaching compared to that?”
“Not understand it, ma'am? Isn't that giving credit to the author for genius, and how does teaching compare to that?”
296
296
I do not wish to repeat all my own bons mots in praise of study, and on the disadvantages of profound ignorance, but I would, willingly, if I could, give an idea of the mixed indignation and contempt expressed by our companion at the idea that study was necessary to the formation of taste, and to the development of genius. At last, however, he closed the discussion thus,—“There is no use in disputing a point that is already settled, madam; the best judges declare that Mr. H—g’s portraits are equal to that of Lawrence.”
I don't want to repeat all my witty remarks about the benefits of studying and the downsides of being profoundly ignorant, but I would gladly share the mixed anger and disdain our friend showed at the idea that studying is necessary for developing taste and genius. Eventually, though, he wrapped up the discussion by saying, “There's no point in arguing about something that's already settled, ma'am; the best critics agree that Mr. H—g’s portraits are just as good as Lawrence’s.”
“Who is it who has passed this judgement, sir?”
“Who is it that has made this judgment, sir?”
“The men of taste of America, madam.”
“The men of taste in America, madam.”
I then asked him, if he thought it was going to rain?
I then asked him if he thought it was going to rain.
The stages do not appear to have any regular stations at which to stop for breakfast, dinner, and supper. These necessary interludes, therefore, being generally impromptu, were abominably bad. We were amused by the patient manner in which our American fellow-travellers ate whatever was set before them, without uttering a word of complaint, or making any effort to improve it, but no sooner reseated in the stage, than they began their complaints—“twas a shame”—“twas a robbery”—“twas poisoning folks”—and the like. I, at last, asked the reason of this, and why they did not remonstrate? “Because, madam, no American gentleman or lady that keeps an inn won’t bear to be found fault with.”
The stages don’t seem to have any regular stops for breakfast, lunch, or dinner. So, these necessary breaks were usually impromptu and just terrible. We found it amusing how our American fellow travelers ate whatever was put in front of them without saying a word of complaint or trying to make it better, but as soon as they were back in their seats on the stage, the complaints started—“It’s a shame,” “It’s a rip-off,” “It's poisoning people,” and so on. Eventually, I asked why they didn’t speak up. “Because, ma’am, no American gentleman or lady who runs an inn can stand to be criticized.”
We reached Utica very late and very weary; but the delights of a good hotel and perfect civility sent us in good humour to bed, and we arose sufficiently refreshed to enjoy a day’s journey through some of the loveliest scenery in the world.
We arrived in Utica quite late and exhausted; however, the comforts of a nice hotel and excellent hospitality put us in a good mood for bed, and we woke up refreshed enough to enjoy a day’s journey through some of the most beautiful scenery in the world.
Who is it that says America is not picturesque? I forget; but surely he never travelled from Utica to Albany. I really cannot conceive that any country can furnish a drive of ninety-six miles more beautiful, or more varied in its beauty. The road follows the Mohawk River, which flows through scenes changing from fields, waving with plenty, to rocks and woods; gentle slopes, covered with cattle, are divided from each other by precipices 500 feet high. Around the little falls there is a character of beauty as singular as it is striking. Here, as I observed of many other American rivers, the stream appears to run in a much narrower channel than it once occupied, and the space which it seems formerly to have filled, is now covered with bright green herbage, save that, at intervals, large masses of rock rise abruptly from the level turf; these are crowned with all such trees as love the scanty diet which a rock affords. Dwarf oak, cedars, and the mountain ash, are grouped in a hundred different ways among them; each clump you look upon is lovelier than its neighbour; I never saw so sweetly wild a spot.
Who says America isn't picturesque? I can't recall, but they definitely haven't traveled from Utica to Albany. Honestly, I can't imagine any country offering a drive of ninety-six miles that's more beautiful or diverse in its scenery. The road follows the Mohawk River, which flows through landscapes that shift from fertile fields to rocky woods. Gentle slopes, dotted with cattle, are separated by cliffs that rise 500 feet high. Around the small waterfalls, there's a kind of beauty that's both unique and striking. Here, like I've noticed with many other American rivers, the stream seems to run in a much narrower channel than it did before, and the area that it seems to have once occupied is now covered in bright green grass, except for spots where large rocks jut up from the flat turf; these rocks are topped with trees that thrive on the limited nutrients rocks provide. Dwarf oaks, cedars, and mountain ashes are arranged in countless ways among them; each little group you see is more beautiful than the last; I've never encountered such a sweetly wild place.
I was surprised to hear a fellow-traveller say, as we passed a point of peculiar beauty, “all this neighbourhood belongs, or did belong, to Mr. Edward Ellice, an English Member of Parliament, but he has sold a deal of it, and now, madam, you may see as it begins to improve;” and he pointed to a great wooden edifice, where, on the white paint, “Cash for Rags,” in letters three feet high, might be seen.
I was surprised to hear a fellow traveler say, as we passed a spot of unusual beauty, “All this area belongs, or used to belong, to Mr. Edward Ellice, an English Member of Parliament, but he has sold off a lot of it, and now, ma'am, you can see how it’s starting to improve;” and he pointed to a large wooden building, where, in three-foot-high letters on the white paint, it read, “Cash for Rags.”
I then remembered that it was near this spot that my Yankee friend had made his complaint against English indifference to “water privilege.” He did not name Mr. Edward Ellice, but doubtless he was the “English, as never thought of improvement.”
I then remembered that it was around here that my Yankee friend had raised his issue about English indifference to “water privilege.” He didn't mention Mr. Edward Ellice by name, but he was definitely referring to the “English, who never thought of improvement.”
I have often confessed my conscious incapacity for description, but I must repeat it here to apologize for my passing so dully through this matchless valley of the Mohawk. I would that some British artist, strong in youthful daring, would take my word for it, and pass over, for a summer pilgrimage through the State of New York. In very earnest, he would wisely, for I question if the world could furnish within the same space, and with equal facility of access, so many subjects for his pencil. Mountains, forests, rocks, lakes, rivers, cataracts, all in perfection. But he must be bold as a lion in colouring, or he will make nothing of it. There is a clearness of atmosphere, a strength of chiaro oscuro, a massiveness in the foliage, and a brilliance of contrast, that must make a colourist of any one who has an eye. He must have courage to dip his pencil in shadows black as night, and light that might blind an eagle. As I presume my young artist to be an enthusiast, he must first go direct to Niagara, or even in the Mohawk valley his pinioned wing may droop. If his fever run very high, he may slake his thirst at Trenton, and while there, he will not dream of any thing beyond it. Should my advice be taken, I will ask the young adventurer on his return (when he shall have made a prodigious quantity of money by my hint), to reward me by two sketches. One shall be the lake of Canandaigua; the other the Indians’ Senate Grove of Butternuts.
I’ve often admitted my inability to describe things, but I need to say it again as an apology for how boringly I’ve gone through this incredible Mohawk Valley. I wish some daring young British artist would believe me and make a summer trip through New York. Seriously, he’d be wise to do so because I doubt there’s anywhere else that offers this many great subjects for his art in such a small area and with easy access. There are mountains, forests, rocks, lakes, rivers, and waterfalls—all perfect. But he’ll need to be bold with colors, or he won’t capture any of it well. The air is so clear, the contrast in light and shade is strong, the foliage is massive, and the vibrancy of colors will inspire any artist with an eye for detail. He must be brave enough to use shadows as dark as night and highlights that could blind an eagle. Assuming my young artist is passionate, he should go straight to Niagara first; otherwise, he might lose his excitement even in the Mohawk Valley. If he’s really enthusiastic, he could quench his thirst for inspiration at Trenton, and while there, he won’t think about anything beyond it. If he follows my advice, I’ll ask the young adventurer when he returns (after making a fortune based on my suggestion) to reward me with two sketches. One should be of Canandaigua Lake, and the other of the Native Americans’ Senate Grove of Butternuts.
During our journey, I forget on which day of it, a particular spot in the forest, at some distance from the road, was pointed out to us as the scene of a true, but very romantic story. During the great and the terrible French revolution (1792), a young nobleman escaped from the scene of horror, having with difficulty saved his head, and without the possibility of saving any thing else. He arrived at New York nearly destitute; and after passing his life, not only in splendour, but in the splendour of the court of France, he found himself jostled by the busy population of the New World, without a dollar between him and starvation. In such a situation one might almost sigh for the guillotine. The young noble strove to labour; but who would purchase the trembling efforts of his white hands, while the sturdy strength of many a black Hercules was in the market? He abandoned the vain attempt to sustain himself by the aid of his fellow-men, and determined to seek a refuge in the forest. A few shillings only remained to him; he purchased an axe, and reached the Oneida territory. He felled a few of the slenderest trees, and made himself a shelter that Robinson Crusoe would have laughed at, for it did not keep out the rain. Want of food, exposure to the weather, and unwonted toil, produced the natural result; the unfortunate young man fell sick, and stretched upon the reeking earth, stifled, rather than sheltered, by the withering boughs which hung over him; he lay parched with thirst, and shivering in ague, with the one last earthly hope, that each heavy moment would prove the last.
During our journey, I can’t remember on which day it was, a certain spot in the forest, a bit away from the road, was pointed out to us as the setting for a real but very romantic story. During the great and terrible French Revolution (1792), a young nobleman escaped from the horrors of that time, barely managing to save his head and nothing else. He arrived in New York almost broke; after living a life not just in luxury but in the opulence of the French court, he found himself crowded by the busy people of the New World, without a dollar to his name and facing starvation. In such a situation, one might almost long for the guillotine. The young noble tried to find work, but who would buy the shaky efforts of his delicate hands when the market was full of strong, capable workers? He gave up the futile attempt to rely on others for support and decided to seek refuge in the forest. With only a few shillings left, he bought an axe and made his way to the Oneida territory. He chopped down a few of the thinnest trees and built himself a shelter that even Robinson Crusoe would have laughed at, since it didn’t keep out the rain. Lack of food, exposure to the elements, and unfamiliar hard work took their toll; the unfortunate young man fell ill, lying on the damp ground, suffocated rather than sheltered by the wilting branches above him. He lay there, parched with thirst and shivering with fever, hoping desperately that each heavy moment would be his last.
Near to the spot which he had chosen for his miserable rest, but totally concealed from it by the thick forest, was the last straggling wigwam of an Indian village. It is not known how many days the unhappy man had lain without food, but he was quite insensible when a young squaw, whom chance had brought from this wigwam to his hut, entered, and found him alive, but totally insensible. The heart of woman is, I believe, pretty much the same every where; the young girl paused not to think whether he were white or red, but her fleet feet rested not till she had brought milk, rum, and blankets, and when the sufferer recovered his senses, his head was supported on her lap, while, with the gentle tenderness of a mother, she found means to make him swallow the restoratives she had brought.
Close to the spot where he had settled for his miserable rest, but completely hidden from it by the dense forest, was the last straggling wigwam of an Indian village. It's unclear how many days the unfortunate man had been lying there without food, but he was completely out of it when a young woman, who happened to come from this wigwam to his shelter, entered and found him alive but totally unresponsive. I believe a woman's heart is pretty much the same everywhere; the young girl didn't stop to think about whether he was white or red, and her quick feet didn’t rest until she brought milk, rum, and blankets. When the man regained consciousness, his head rested on her lap while, with the gentle care of a mother, she found a way to help him swallow the restorative items she had brought.
No black eyes in the world, be they of France, Italy, or even of Spain, can speak more plainly of kindness, than the large deep-set orbs of a squaw; this is a language that all nations can understand, and the poor Frenchman read most clearly, in the anxious glance of his gentle nurse, that he should not die forsaken.
No black eyes in the world, whether from France, Italy, or even Spain, can express kindness more clearly than the large, deep-set eyes of a Native American woman; this is a language that everyone can understand, and the poor Frenchman saw very clearly in the worried look of his caring nurse that he would not die alone.
So far the story is romantic enough, and what follows is hardly less so. The squaw found means to introduce her white friend to her tribe; he was adopted as their brother, speedily acquired their language, and assumed their dress and manner of life. His gratitude to his preserver soon ripened into love, and if the chronicle spoke true, the French noble and the American savage were more than passing happy as man and wife, and it was not till he saw himself the father of many thriving children that the exile began to feel a wish of rising again from savage to civilized existence.
So far, the story is pretty romantic, and what comes next is just as much so. The woman found a way to introduce her white friend to her tribe; he was accepted as their brother, quickly learned their language, and adopted their clothing and way of life. His gratitude to his savior soon turned into love, and if the account is accurate, the French noble and the American native were more than just happily married, and it wasn't until he saw himself as the father of many thriving children that the exile began to long for a return to a more civilized life.
My historian did not explain what his project was in visiting New York, but he did so in the habit of an Indian, and learnt enough of the restored tranquillity of his country to give him hope that some of the broad lands he had left there might be restored to him.
My historian didn’t explain the purpose of his trip to New York, but he did so in a way that reminded me of an Indian. He learned enough about the newfound peace in his country to feel hopeful that some of the vast lands he had left behind might be returned to him.
I have made my story already too long, and must not linger upon it farther than to say that his hopes were fulfilled, and that, of a large and flourishing family, some are settled in France, and some remain in America, (one of these, I understood, was a lawyer at New York), while the hero and the heroine of the tale continue to inhabit the Oneida country, not in a wigwam, however, but in a good house, in a beautiful situation, with all the comforts of civilized life around them.
I’ve already made my story too long and shouldn’t dwell on it any further, except to say that his hopes came true, and from a large and thriving family, some settled in France and some stayed in America (one of them, I found out, is a lawyer in New York). Meanwhile, the hero and heroine of the story still live in the Oneida area, not in a wigwam, but in a nice house, in a beautiful spot, surrounded by all the comforts of modern life.
Such was the narrative we listened to, from a stage coach companion; and it appears to me sufficiently interesting to repeat, though I have no better authority to quote for its truth, than the assertion of this unknown traveller.
Such was the story we heard from a stagecoach companion; and I find it interesting enough to share, even though I have no better source to confirm its truth than the words of this unknown traveler.
CHAPTER XXXIV
Return to New York—Conclusion
Return to New York—Final Thoughts
The comfortable Adelphi Hotel again received us at Albany, on the 14th of June, and we decided upon passing the following day there, both to see the place, and to recruit our strength, which we began to feel we had taxed severely by a very fatiguing journey, in most oppressively hot weather. It would have been difficult to find a better station for repose; the rooms were large and airy, and ice was furnished in most profuse abundance.
The cozy Adelphi Hotel welcomed us back in Albany on June 14th, and we decided to spend the next day there to explore the area and recover our energy, which we realized we had drained from a tiring trip in extremely hot weather. It would have been hard to find a better place to relax; the rooms were spacious and breezy, and there was plenty of ice available.
But notwithstanding the manifold advantages of this excellent hotel, I was surprised at the un-English arrangement communicated to me by two ladies with whom we made a speaking acquaintance, by which it appeared that they made it their permanent home. These ladies were a mother and daughter; the daughter was an extremely pretty young married woman, with two little children. Where the husbands were, or whether they were dead or alive, I know not; but they told me they had been boarding there above a year. They breakfasted, dined, and supped at the table d’hôte, with from twenty to a hundred people, as accident might decide; dressed very smart, played on the piano, in the public sitting-room, and assured me they were particularly comfortable and well accommodated. What a life!
But despite the many advantages of this excellent hotel, I was surprised by the un-English arrangement shared with me by two ladies we met, who seemed to have made this place their permanent home. These ladies were a mother and daughter; the daughter was a very attractive young married woman with two small children. I didn't know where their husbands were or if they were alive or dead, but they told me they had been boarding there for over a year. They had breakfast, lunch, and dinner at the table d’hôte, with anywhere from twenty to a hundred guests, depending on the day; they dressed very stylishly, played the piano in the public lounge, and assured me they were quite comfortable and well taken care of. What a life!
Some parts of the town are very handsome; the Town Hall, the Chamber of Representatives, and some other public buildings, stand well on a hill that overlooks the Hudson, with ample enclosures of grass and trees around them.
Some areas of the town are really beautiful; the Town Hall, the Chamber of Representatives, and a few other public buildings are situated nicely on a hill that looks out over the Hudson, surrounded by plenty of grassy spaces and trees.
Many of the shops are large, and showily set out. I was amused by a national trait which met me at one of them. I entered it to purchase some eau de Cologne, but finding what was offered to me extremely bad, and very cheap, I asked if they had none at a higher price, and better.
Many of the stores are big and attractively displayed. I was entertained by a national characteristic that I encountered at one of them. I went in to buy some eau de Cologne, but after discovering that what they had was really poor quality and very cheap, I asked if they had anything at a higher price and better quality.
“You are a stranger, I guess,” was the answer. “The Yankees want low price, that’s all; they don’t stand so much for goodness as the English.”
“You're a stranger, I suppose,” was the response. “The Yankees only care about low prices; they don't value goodness as much as the English do.”
Nothing could be more beautiful than our passage down the Hudson on the following day, as I thought of some of my friends in England, dear lovers of the picturesque, I could not but exclaim,
Nothing could be more beautiful than our journey down the Hudson the next day. As I thought of some of my friends in England, who love beautiful scenery, I couldn't help but exclaim,
“Que je vous plains! que je vous plains!
Vous ne la verrez pas.”
“Poor you! Poor you!
You won’t see her.”
Not even a moving panoramic view, gliding before their eyes for an hour together, in all the scenic splendour of Drury Lane, or Covent Garden, could give them an idea of it. They could only see one side at a time. The change, the contrast, the ceaseless variety of beauty, as you skim from side to side, the liquid smoothness of the broad mirror that reflects the scene, and most of all, the clear bright air through which you look at it; all this can only be seen and believed by crossing the Atlantic.
Not even a moving panoramic view, gliding before their eyes for an hour straight, showcasing all the scenic beauty of Drury Lane or Covent Garden, could give them any idea of it. They could only see one side at a time. The change, the contrast, the endless variety of beauty as you shift from side to side, the smoothness of the wide mirror reflecting the scene, and most importantly, the clear bright air through which you view it—all of this can only be truly experienced and believed by crossing the Atlantic.
As we approached New York the burning heat of the day relaxed, and the long shadows of evening fell coolly on the beautiful villas we passed. I really can conceive nothing more exquisitely lovely than this approach to the city. The magnificent boldness of the Jersey shore on the one side, and the luxurious softness of the shady lawns on the other, with the vast silvery stream that flows between them, altogether form a picture which may well excuse a traveller for saying, once and again, that the Hudson river can be surpassed in beauty by none on the outside of Paradise.
As we got closer to New York, the scorching heat of the day eased off, and the long evening shadows coolly settled on the beautiful villas we passed. I honestly can't think of anything more stunning than this approach to the city. The striking boldness of the Jersey shore on one side and the lush softness of the shady lawns on the other, with the vast silver river flowing between them, all create a scene that could easily make a traveler repeat that the Hudson River is more beautiful than anything outside of Paradise.
It was nearly dark when we reached the city, and it was with great satisfaction that we found our comfortable apartments in Hudson Street unoccupied; and our pretty, kind (Irish) hostess willing to receive us again. We passed another fortnight there; and again we enjoyed the elegant hospitality of New York, though now it was offered from beneath the shade of their beautiful villas. In truth, were all America like this fair city, and all, no, only a small proportion of its population like the friends we left there, I should say, that the land was the fairest in the world.
It was almost dark when we arrived in the city, and we were really pleased to find our cozy apartments on Hudson Street empty and our lovely, friendly (Irish) hostess ready to welcome us back. We spent another two weeks there, enjoying the refined hospitality of New York once more, but this time from beneath the shade of their beautiful homes. Honestly, if all of America were like this lovely city and only a small part of its people were like the friends we left behind, I would say the country was the most beautiful in the world.
But the time was come to bid it adieu! The important business of securing our homeward passage was to be performed. One must know what it is to cross the ocean before the immense importance of all the little details of accommodation can be understood. The anxious first look: into the face of the captain, to ascertain if he be gentle or rough; another, scarcely less important, in that of the steward, generally a sable one, but not the less expressive; the accurate, but rapid glance of measurement thrown round the little state-rooms; another at the good or bad arrangement of the stair-case, by which you are to stumble up and stumble down, from cabin to deck, and from deck to cabin; all this, they only can understand who have felt it. At length, however, this interesting affair was settled, and most happily. The appearance promised well, and the performance bettered it. We hastened to pack up our “trumpery,” as Captain Mirven unkindly calls the paraphernalia of the ladies, and among the rest, my six hundred pages of griffonage. There is enough of it, yet I must add a few more lines.
But it was time to say goodbye! The crucial task of arranging our journey home had to be done. You really need to experience crossing the ocean to fully appreciate all the little details of comfort involved. The anxious first glance at the captain's face, to see if he’s pleasant or harsh; then at the steward's, usually a Black man, but still revealing; the quick yet thorough look around the tiny cabins; another glance at the layout of the staircase you’ll be navigating up and down from cabin to deck and back; all of this can only be truly understood by those who have been in the situation. Finally, this important matter was settled, and it turned out very well. The appearance looked good, and the experience exceeded expectations. We hurried to pack our “trumpery,” as Captain Mirven unkindly refers to the ladies' things, including my six hundred pages of scribbles. There's plenty of it, but I still need to add a few more lines.
I suspect that what I have written will make it evident that I do not like America. Now, as it happens that I met with individuals there whom I love and admire, far beyond the love and admiration of ordinary acquaintance, and as I declare the country to be fair to the eye, and most richly teeming with the gifts of plenty, I am led to ask myself why it is that I do not like it. I would willingly know myself, and confess to others, why it is that neither its beauty nor its abundance can suffice to neutralize, or greatly soften, the distaste which the aggregate of my recollections has left upon my mind.
I think what I’ve written will show that I don’t like America. Though I’ve met people there whom I love and admire, far more than just a casual acquaintance, and I acknowledge that the country is beautiful and overflowing with abundance, I find myself questioning why I feel this way. I want to understand myself and admit to others why neither its beauty nor its wealth can really overcome, or significantly ease, the dislike that the sum of my memories has left in my mind.
I remember hearing it said, many years ago, when the advantages and disadvantages of a particular residence were being discussed, that it was the “who?” and not the “where?” that made the difference between the pleasant or unpleasant residence. The truth of the observation struck me forcibly when I heard it; and it has been recalled to my mind since, by the constantly recurring evidence of its justness. In applying this to America, I speak not of my friends, nor of my friends’ friends. The small patrician band is a race apart; they live with each other, and for each other; mix wondrously little with the high matters of state, which they seem to leave rather supinely to their tailors and tinkers, and are no more to be taken as a sample of the American people, than the head of Lord Byron as a sample of the heads of the British peerage. I speak not of these, but of the population generally, as seen in town and country, among the rich and the poor, in the slave states, and the free states. I do not like them. I do not like their principles, I do not like their manners, I do not like their opinions.
I remember hearing, many years ago, during a conversation about the pros and cons of a certain place to live, that it was the “who?” and not the “where?” that determined whether a residence was pleasant or unpleasant. The truth of that statement hit me hard when I first heard it, and it's been brought to my mind repeatedly by the consistent proof of its accuracy. When I apply this to America, I’m not talking about my friends or my friends' friends. The small elite group is a separate breed; they socialize only with one another and seem to live for each other; they hardly engage with important state issues, which they tend to leave to their tailors and tinkers, and they can't be considered representative of the American people any more than Lord Byron’s head can represent the heads of the British aristocracy. I'm not referring to them, but to the general population, as seen in urban and rural areas, among the rich and the poor, in the slave states and the free states. I don't like them. I don't like their principles, I don't like their manners, I don't like their opinions.
Both as a woman, and as a stranger, it might be unseemly for me to say that I do not like their government, and therefore I will not say so. That it is one which pleases themselves is most certain, and this is considerably more important than pleasing all the travelling old ladies in the world. I entered the country at New Orleans, remained for more than two years west of the Alleghanies, and passed another year among the Atlantic cities, and the country around them. I conversed during this time with citizens of all orders and degrees, and I never heard from any one a single disparaging word against their government. It is not, therefore, surprising, that when the people of that country hear strangers questioning the wisdom of their institutions, and expressing disapprobation at some of their effects, they should set it down either to an incapacity of judging, or a malicious feeling of envy and ill-will.
Both as a woman and as an outsider, it might not be appropriate for me to say that I don't like their government, so I won’t. It's definitely clear that it makes them happy, and that’s much more important than pleasing all the traveling old ladies in the world. I entered the country in New Orleans, stayed for over two years west of the Alleghenies, and spent another year among the Atlantic cities and the surrounding area. During that time, I talked to people from all walks of life, and I never heard a single negative comment about their government. So, it’s not surprising that when people in that country hear outsiders questioning the wisdom of their institutions or expressing disapproval of some of their effects, they often think it’s due to a lack of judgment or a spiteful feeling of envy and ill-will.
“How can any one in their senses doubt the excellence of a government which we have tried for half a century, and loved the better the longer we have known it.” Such is the natural enquiry of every American when the excellence of their government is doubted; and I am inclined to answer, that no one in their senses, who has visited the country, and known the people, can doubt its fitness for them, such as they now are, or its utter unfitness for any other people..
“How can anyone in their right mind question the quality of a government that we have experienced for half a century and have grown to appreciate more the longer we’ve known it?” This is the typical question from every American when their government is criticized; and I’m inclined to say that no one in their right mind, who has visited the country and understood the people, can doubt its suitability for them, as they are now, or its complete unsuitability for any other people.
Whether the government has made the people what they are, or whether the people have made the government what it is, to suit themselves, I know not; but if the latter, they have shown a consummation of wisdom which the assembled world may look upon and admire.
Whether the government has shaped the people or the people have shaped the government to fit their needs, I'm not sure; but if it's the latter, they have demonstrated a level of wisdom that the whole world can look at and admire.
It is a matter of historical notoriety that the original stock of the white population now inhabiting the United States, were persons who had banished themselves, or were banished from the mother country. The land they found was favourable to their increase and prosperity; the colony grew and flourished. Years rolled on, and the children, the grand-children, and the great grand-children of the first settlers, replenished the land, and found it flowing with milk and honey. That they should wish to keep this milk and honey to themselves, is not very surprising. What did the mother country do for them? She sent them out gay and gallant officers to guard their frontier; the which they thought they could guard as well themselves; and then she taxed their tea. Now, this was disagreeable; and to atone for it, the distant colony had no great share in her mother’s grace and glory. It was not from among them that her high and mighty were chosen; the rays which emanated from that bright sun of honour, the British throne, reached them but feebly. They knew not, they cared not, for her kings nor her heroes; their thriftiest trader was their noblest man; the holy seats of learning were but the cradles of superstition; the splendour of the aristocracy, but a leech that drew their “golden blood.” The wealth, the learning, the glory of Britain, was to them nothing; the having their own way every thing.
It’s well-known in history that the original white population living in the United States were people who either chose to leave or were forced out of their home country. The land they discovered was great for their growth and prosperity; the colony expanded and thrived. Over the years, the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of the first settlers filled the land and found it rich and rewarding. It’s not surprising that they wanted to keep this prosperity for themselves. What did the home country do for them? It sent cheerful and brave officers to protect their borders, but they believed they could defend themselves just as well; then, they imposed a tax on their tea. This was annoying, and the distant colony didn’t receive much recognition or favor from their mother country. People of importance were rarely chosen from among them; the rays of honor from the bright sun of the British throne barely reached them. They didn’t know or care about her kings or heroes; their most successful trader was their most esteemed individual; the prestigious institutions of learning were just places of superstition; and the glamour of the aristocracy was just a parasite that drained their resources. The wealth, knowledge, and glory of Britain meant nothing to them; what mattered most was having their own way.
Can any blame their wish to obtain it? Can any lament that they succeeded?
Can anyone blame their desire to get it? Can anyone regret that they succeeded?
And now the day was their own, what should they do next? Their elders drew together, and said, “Let us make a government that shall suit us all; let it be rude, and rough, and noisy; let it not affect either dignity, glory, or splendour; let it interfere with no man’s will, nor meddle with any man’s business; let us have neither tithes nor taxes, game laws, nor poor laws; let every man have a hand in making the laws, and no man be troubled about keeping them; let not our magistrates wear purple, nor our judges ermine; if a man grow rich, let us take care that his grandson be poor, and then we shall all keep equal; let every man take care of himself, and if England should come to bother us again, why then we will fight altogether.”
And now the day was theirs, what should they do next? Their elders gathered together and said, “Let’s create a government that works for all of us; let it be simple, rough, and loud; let it not be concerned with dignity, glory, or splendor; let it not interfere with anyone’s will, nor meddle in anyone’s business; let’s have no tithes or taxes, no game laws or poor laws; let every person have a say in making the laws, and no one be worried about following them; let our officials not wear fancy robes, nor our judges wear expensive fur; if someone gets rich, let’s make sure his grandson is poor, so we can all stay equal; let everyone look after themselves, and if England tries to bother us again, then we’ll fight together.”
Could any thing be better imagined than such a government for a people so circumstanced? Or is it strange that they are contented with it? Still less is it strange that those who have lived in the repose of order, and felt secure that their country could go on very well, and its business proceed without their bawling and squalling, scratching and scrambling to help it, should bless the gods that they are not republicans.
Could anything be better imagined than such a government for a people in their situation? Or is it surprising that they are satisfied with it? Even less surprising is that those who have lived in the comfort of order, and felt secure that their country could function well without their constant fussing and scrambling to help it, should be thankful that they are not republicans.
So far all is well. That they should prefer a constitution which suits them so admirably, to one which would not suit them at all, is surely no cause of quarrel on our part; nor should it be such on theirs, if we feel no inclination to exchange the institutions which have made us what we are, for any other on the face of the earth.
So far, everything is good. It’s definitely not a reason for us to argue if they choose a constitution that works perfectly for them over one that wouldn’t work for them at all; and it shouldn’t be a reason for them to argue either, especially since we have no desire to trade the systems that have shaped us for any other in the world.
But when a native of Europe visits America, a most extraordinary species of tyranny is set in action against him; and as far as my reading and experience have enabled me to judge, it is such as no other country has ever exercised against strangers.
But when someone from Europe visits America, a truly bizarre form of oppression is unleashed against them; and based on what I've read and experienced, it's unlike anything any other country has ever imposed on outsiders.
The Frenchman visits England; he is abimé d’ennui at our stately dinners; shrugs his shoulders at our corps de ballet, and laughs à gorge déployée at our passion for driving, and our partial affection for roast beef and plum pudding. The Englishman returns the visit, and the first thing he does on arriving at Paris, is to hasten to le Théatre des Variétés, that he may see “Les Anglaises pour rire,” and if among the crowd of laughters, you hear a note of more cordial mirth than the rest, seek out the person from whom it proceeds, and you will find the Englishman.
The Frenchman visits England; he is abimé d’ennui at our fancy dinners; shrugs his shoulders at our corps de ballet, and laughs à gorge déployée at our love for driving and our partiality for roast beef and plum pudding. The Englishman returns the visit, and the first thing he does upon arriving in Paris is rush to le Théatre des Variétés to see “Les Anglaises pour rire,” and if you hear a laugh that’s more genuine than the others in the crowd, look for the person it comes from, and you’ll find the Englishman.
The Italian comes to our green island, and groans at our climate; he vows that the air which destroys a statue cannot be wholesome for man; he sighs for orange trees, and maccaroni, and smiles at the pretensions of a nation to poetry, while no epics are chaunted through her streets. Yet we welcome the sensitive southern with all kindness, listen to his complaints with interest, cultivate our little orange trees, and teach our children to lisp Tasso, in the hope of becoming more agreeable.
The Italian arrives at our lush island and complains about our weather; he insists that air that can ruin a statue can’t be healthy for people. He longs for orange trees and pasta, and finds it amusing that we aspire to be a poetic nation while no epic poems are recited on our streets. Yet, we greet the sensitive southerner with warmth, listen to his grievances with genuine interest, nurture our small orange trees, and teach our kids to recite Tasso, hoping to become more pleasant.
Yet we are not at all superior to the rest of Europe in our endurance of censure, nor is this wish to profit by it all peculiar to the English; we laugh at, and find fault with, our neighbours quite as freely as they do with us, and they join the laugh, and adopt our fashions and our customs. These mutual pleasantries produce no shadow of unkindly feeling; and as long as the governments are at peace with each other, the individuals of every nation in Europe make it a matter of pride, as well as of pleasure, to meet each other frequently, to discuss, compare, and reason upon their national varieties, and to vote it a mark of fashion and good taste to imitate each other in all the external embellishments of life.
Yet we’re not at all better than the rest of Europe when it comes to handling criticism, nor is the desire to benefit from it unique to the English; we poke fun at and find fault with our neighbors just as openly as they do with us, and they join in the laughter, adopting our styles and customs. These playful interactions create no sense of animosity; as long as the governments are at peace with one another, people from every nation in Europe take pride and pleasure in meeting up often to discuss, compare, and reason about their national differences, considering it fashionable and good taste to mimic each other in all the outer details of life.
The consequence of this is most pleasantly perceptible at the present time, in every capital of Europe. The long peace has given time for each to catch from each what was best in customs and manners, and the rapid advance of refinement and general information has been the result.
The impact of this is clearly seen today in every European capital. The long period of peace has allowed each city to learn from the best customs and manners of the others, leading to a significant improvement in refinement and overall knowledge.
To those who have been accustomed to this state of things, the contrast upon crossing to the new world is inconceivably annoying; and it cannot be doubted that this is one great cause of the general feeling of irksomeness, and fatigue of spirits, which hangs upon the memory while recalling the hours passed in American society.
To those who have gotten used to this situation, the difference when moving to the new world is incredibly frustrating; and it’s clear that this is a big reason for the overall sense of discomfort and mental exhaustion that lingers when remembering the time spent in American society.
A single word indicative of doubt, that any thing, or every thing, in that country is not the very best in the world, produces an effect which must be seen and felt to be understood. If the citizens of the United States were indeed the devoted patriots they call themselves, they would surely not thus encrust themselves in the hard, dry, stubborn persuasion, that they are the first and best of the human race, that nothing is to be learnt, but what they are able to teach, and that nothing is worth having, which they do not possess.
A single word that suggests doubt about whether anything or everything in that country is the absolute best in the world creates an impact that you have to see and feel to fully grasp. If the citizens of the United States truly were the devoted patriots they claim to be, they wouldn't wrap themselves up in the rigid, unyielding belief that they are the top and finest of humanity, that they have nothing to learn except what they can teach, and that nothing is valuable unless they already own it.
The art of man could hardly discover a more effectual antidote to improvement, than this persuasion; and yet I never listened to any public oration, or read any work, professedly addressed to the country, in which they did not labour to impress it on the minds of the people.
The skill of man could hardly find a more effective barrier to progress than this belief; and yet I’ve never heard a public speech or read a book, supposedly aimed at the nation, in which they didn’t strive to instill it in the minds of the people.
To hint to the generality of Americans that the silent current of events may change their beloved government, is not the way to please them; but in truth they need be tormented with no such fear. As long as by common consent they can keep down the pre-eminence which nature has assigned to great powers, as long as they can prevent human respect and human honour from resting upon high talent, gracious manners, and exalted station, so long may they be sure of going on as they are.
To suggest to the average American that the subtle flow of events could alter their cherished government isn’t likely to make them happy; but honestly, they shouldn't have to worry about such fears. As long as they can collectively suppress the dominance that nature has given to powerful individuals, and as long as they can keep human respect and honor from being based on exceptional talent, refined manners, and high status, they can be confident that things will remain as they are.
I have been told, however, that there are some among them who would gladly see a change; some, who with the wisdom of philosophers, and the fair candour of gentlemen, shrink from a profession of equality which they feel to be untrue, and believe to be impossible.
I’ve been told, though, that there are some among them who would happily welcome a change; some who, with the insight of philosophers and the honest fairness of gentlemen, hesitate to declare equality that they see as untrue and believe to be impossible.
I can well believe that such there are, though to me no such opinions were communicated, and most truly should I rejoice to see power pass into such hands.
I can definitely believe that there are people like that, even though no one shared those opinions with me, and I would be really happy to see power go to those kinds of people.
If this ever happens, if refinement once creeps in among them, if they once learn to cling to the graces, the honours, the chivalry of life, then we shall say farewell to American equality, and welcome to European fellowship one of the finest countries on the earth.
If this ever happens, if sophistication starts to seep in among them, if they ever learn to hold on to the charms, the honors, the chivalry of life, then we will say goodbye to American equality and welcome one of the finest countries on earth into European camaraderie.
THE END
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!