This is a modern-English version of Lands of the Slave and the Free; Or, Cuba, the United States, and Canada, originally written by Murray, Henry A. (Henry Anthony). It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.


LANDS OF THE
SLAVE AND THE FREE:

OR,
Cuba, the United States, and Canada.

BY

CAPTAIN THE HON. HENRY A. MURRAY, R.N.

Entrance to a Coffee Planter's Residence.

Entrance to a Coffee Planter's Residence.

Entrance to a Coffee Planter's Residence.

Entrance to a Coffee Grower's Home.

1857.

1857.

"He only gave us power over beasts, fish, and birds,"

Absolute dominion; that right we possess.

Through his donation; yet humanity prevails over humanity.

He is not a lord.

MILTON.

MILTON.

"Sold and gone,"

To the rice swamp, wet and lonely;

There’s no mother's eye nearby,

There’s no mother’s ear that can hear them;

Never, when the whipping lash

Sews their backs with many cuts,

May a mother's kindness bless them,

"Or a mother's arms hold them close."

WHITTIER.

WHITTIER.

"CURIOSITY NEVER GETS ANGRY ABOUT LEARNING."[A]

ANTONIO PEREZ

ANTONIO PÉREZ

"Oh, give me freedom!

For if Paradise were my prison,

"Still, I wish I could jump over the crystal walls."

DRYDEN.

DRYDEN.

"A happy place this world would be,

If men, when they're here, would find a way to agree,

And he said to his neighbor in cottage and hall,

"Come, give me your hand, we're all brothers."

[Transcribers note *: illegible]

[Transcribers note *: illegible]

ROBERT NICOL.

ROBERT NICOL.

TO NIF, NASUS, AND CO.,

THESE BOOKS

Are Committed

AS A SIGN OF GENUINE AND WARM REGARD

YOUR OBEDIENT SERVANT,


HENRY A. MURRAY.


LONDON, JUNE 1, 1855.


SECOND AND CHEAP EDITION.


The encouragement of friends, and the opinions expressed by a large majority of those publications that considered the former edition worthy of notice, have induced me to cut out many passages which might possibly not interest the general reader, in order that I might send it forth to the public in a more cheap and popular form.

The support from friends and the feedback from most publications that found the previous edition noteworthy have led me to remove several sections that might not interest the average reader, so I could release it to the public in a more affordable and accessible format.

Writing upon such a subject as the United States, her constitution, and her institutions, there was necessarily some danger of a taint of political partisanship. I trust, however, I may he considered to have redeemed the pledge I made of writing "free from political bias," when I have found favour in the pages of two publications so opposite in their politics as the Westminster Review and the Press.

Writing about a topic like the United States, including its constitution and institutions, naturally carries some risk of showing political bias. However, I hope I can be seen as having fulfilled my promise to write "free from political bias," especially since I've received support from two publications with such opposing political views as the Westminster Review and the Press.

One weekly paper with pretensions to literary criticism (the Athenaeum, September 15, 1855) did me the honour of making me the object of its unmeasured censure; but, as I was forewarned that my success would interfere with the prospects of one of its contributors, I was prepared for its animadversions, though most certainly I did not anticipate the good fortune of a zeal so totally void of discretion, that the animus which guided the critic's pen should be too transparent to impose upon even a child.

One weekly publication that claimed to offer literary criticism (the Athenaeum, September 15, 1855) took the liberty of directing harsh criticism at me; however, since I had been warned that my success would negatively impact one of its writers, I was ready for its comments, although I never expected the level of criticism to be so lacking in subtlety that the motives behind the critic's writing would be obvious even to a child.

Conceive a would-be critic, after various spasmodic efforts at severity, selecting from among many comprehensive measures suggested by me for the future emancipation, and for the present benefit, of the slave, the proposition of "a proper instrument for flogging, to be established by law," and that with the evident intention of throwing ridicule on the idea. If the critic were occasionally subject to the discipline of the various instruments used for the punishment of the negro, his instinct would soon teach him that which appears to be at present beyond the grasp of his intellect, viz., the difference between a cow-hide and a dog-whip; and if he knew anything of his own country, he could scarcely be ignorant that the instruments used for corporal punishment in army, navy, and prisons, are established by law or by a custom, as strong as law. But enough of this Athenian Reviewer, I offer for his reflection the old story, "Let her alone, poor thing; it amuses her, and does me no harm." The next time he tries to sling a stone, I hope he will not again crack his own skull in the clumsy endeavour.

Imagine a would-be critic, after several awkward attempts at being serious, picking out from the many comprehensive suggestions I've made for both the future freedom and current well-being of slaves, the idea of "a proper instrument for flogging, to be established by law," clearly intending to mock the concept. If the critic were ever subjected to the various tools used to punish Black people, he would quickly understand what seems to be beyond his comprehension: the difference between a cowhide and a dog whip. And if he knew anything about his own country, he wouldn't be unaware that the devices used for physical punishment in the military, navy, and prisons are established by law or customs as strong as law. But enough about this Athenian Reviewer; I offer him the old saying, "Leave her alone, poor thing; it entertains her, and it doesn’t hurt me." Next time he tries to throw a stone, I hope he doesn’t end up hurting himself again in the clumsy attempt.

"Ill nature mixed with cold blood"

Will create a strong and effective critique.

This helpful lesson therefore we learn,

"Bad wine will turn into good sound vinegar."

OLD PAMPHLET.



I now launch my barque upon a wider ocean than before. The public must decide whether her sails shall flap listlessly against the masts, or swell before a stiff and prosperous breeze.

I now set my boat out on a broader ocean than before. The public has to decide whether her sails will hang uselessly against the masts or fill up with a strong and successful wind.

H.A.M.

H.A.M.


CONTENTS.



Make Ready—Fire—Departure.

Get set—Aim—Launch.

FROM LONDON TO NEW YORK.

From London to New York.

Preparations

LIVERPOOL—Embarkation Scenes

Scenes on Board

CAPE RACE

Pilot

NEW YORK


Land of Stars and Stripes.

Land of Stars and Stripes.

AT NEW YORK.

In New York.

The First View

Custom House

Ferry Boat

First Impressions

Hospitality

American Hotels

Bar and Barbers

Bridal Chamber

Paddy Waiter

Feeding System

Streets and Buildings

Portrait Hatter

Advertisements

Loafing in Broadway


Sights and Amusements.

Attractions and Entertainment.

AT NEW YORK.

In New York.

Yacht Club and Dinner.

Railway Society to LONG ISLAND

Race Stand

Trotting Match

Metallic Coffin

American Horse

Hack Cabs and Drivers

Omnibuses

City Railway Cars

Travelling Railway Cars

Tickets for Luggage

Locomotive

Suggestions for Railway Companies

A Day on the North River.

A Day on the North River.

FROM NEW YORK TO GENESEO.

FROM NYC TO GENESEO.

Embark in Steamer on Hudson

Passengers and Anecdotes

Scenery of River

ALBANY—Disembark

A Hint for Travellers

Population and Prosperity

Railway through Town

Professor of Soap

CANANDAIGUA—Hospitality.

Early Education

Opposite System

Drive across Country—Snake Fences and Scenery

Churches—a Hint for the Highlands

Cheap Bait—GENESEO


Geneseo.

Geneseo.

AT GENESEO

AT GENESEO

Absence of Animal Life—Early Rising

View from the Terrace—Work of the Pioneer

Farm and System, Wages, &c.

A Drive—Family Scene

LAKE CANESUS

Plank road. Toll gates, &c.

Scotch Pikeman


Stirring Scenes and Strange Sights.

Stirring Scenes and Unusual Sights.

FROM GENESEO TO NEW YORK.

From Geneseo to NYC.

A Drive to BATAVIA—Railway Warning

Buffalo Railway Station and Yankee Cabby

Prosperity and Contrast

NIAGARA

ROCHESTER

A Live Bloomer

Advantage proved by Contrast

Reflections on Old Fashions

Pleasant Night


Construction and Destruction.

Building and Breaking.

AT NEW YORK.

In New York.

Cutter Yacht, "Black Maria"

Dinner on Board

Toddy and Chowder

Prosperity—Croton Aqueduct

Destruction of Dogs

Drive on the Bloomingdale Road

A Storm

South and West.

South and West.

FROM NEW YORK TO LOUISVILLE.

From NYC to Louisville.

Ticket Station

PHILADELPHIA—Convenience

Luggage left behind

BALTIMORE—MAXWELL POINT

Canvas-back Ducks

Tolling for Ducks

Start by Rail—A Fix

HARRISBURGH—The Whittling Colonel

Start again. Pleasant Company

Inclined Planes—Canal Boat

Coaching Comfort

PITTSBURG

Railing through Forest, and Reflections

CLEVELAND—Mud-walk

To Sleep or not to Sleep

CINCINNATI—Statistics and Education

Porkopolis and Pigs

A bloody Scene

Ships at Marietta

OHIO—Levee and Literature

Embark on Steamer—Black Stewardess

Ibrahim Pacha and Fat


Scenes Ashore and Afloat.

Onshore and Offshore Scenes.

FROM LOUISVILLE TO ST. LOUIS.

FROM LOUISVILLE TO ST. LOUIS.

Fabrication of the Republican Bonbon

Wood Machinery

A Nine-inside Coach

Human Polecat

Breakfast and Cigar
versus
Foetor

Ferry Crossing—Travelling Beasts

Old Bell's and Old Bell

Cross Country Drive—Scenery

The Mammoth Cave

Old Bell and the Mail

Pleasant Companions

Rural Lavatory

Fat Boy and Circus Intelligence

LOUISVILLE and Advice

Ohio—A Bet at the Bar

A Dinner Scene and a Lady

Dessert and Toothpicks

Evening Recreation

CAIRO—Its Prospects

ST. LOUIS—Its Prosperity


River Scenes.

River Views.

FROM ST. LOUIS TO NEW ORLEANS.

FROM ST. LOUIS TO NEW ORLEANS.

MISSISSIPPI—Good-natured Weakness

Mississippi
v
. Missouri

Stale Anecdote revived

Marriage Certificate

Folly—Description of Steamer

Inspection Farce described

Corporal Punishment—Illustration

Captain of Mizen Top
v
. White Nigger

Scenery

Mississippi—Good night

Screecher & Burster—A Race

Captain leaves us

Bed—Alarm—Wreck

Brutal Heartlessness

River Wreckers

NEW ORLEANS

Wrecks, Causes and Remedies

Anecdotes of Blood


New Orleans.

New Orleans.

FROM NEW ORLEANS TO HAVANA.

From New Orleans to Havana.

Situation and Bustle

Cotton, Tobacco and Sugar

Steamers, and Wages

Streets, Hotels, &c

A Friend in Need. Neighbourhood, Shell-road

Society and Remarks

Rough-and-Tumble—Lola Montez

A Presbyterian Church

The Gold Man

Autocracy of the Police

Law—Boys and Processions

Duel Penalties—Stafford House Address

Clubs

Spanish Consul and Passport

Parting Cadeau

Pilot Dodge

Purser Smith

Sneezing Dangerous—Selecting a Companion

HAVANA


The Queen of the Antilles.

The Queen of the Antilles.

AT CUBA.

In Cuba.

Volante

Lively Funeral

A Light to a Cigar

Evening Amusement

Trip to MATANZAS—El Casero

Slave Plantation

Sugar Making

Luxuriant Vegetation

Punic Faith and Cuban Cruelty

H.M.S. "Vestal"

Bribery

Admiralty Wisdom

Cigars and Manufactory

Population—Chinese

Laws of Domicile—Police and Slavery

Increase of Slaves and Produce

Tobacco, Games, and Lotteries

Cuban Jokes

Sketch of Governors

The Future of Cuba?

Change of Dynasty.

Dynasty Change.

FROM CUBA TO BALTIMORE.

From Cuba to Baltimore.

KEY POINT

Vulgar Hebrew

CHARLESTON, WASHINGTON

Night and Morning

Congress and Inauguration

General Jackson and Changes

Cabmen and City

Shopman and Drinking

Levees and Buildings

BALTIMORE and Terrapin

The Drama

Progress—Fire Companies


Philadelphia and Richmond.

Philly and Richmond.

FROM BALTIMORE TO RICHMOND.

From Baltimore to Richmond.

PHILADELPHIA and Hospitality.

Streets—Mint

Gerard College

High School

A Jail and a Cure for the Turbulent

Lunatic Asylum

NEW YORK and Embark

A Wild Paddy

CHARLESTON Arrival

Hotel and Hospitality

Climate and Buildings

Commercial Prosperity

Fire Companies

Miniature WEST POINT (
Vide
Note)

WILMINGTON Railway Accident

PETERBOROUGH and my Hat

RICHMOND Scenery and Prosperity

Powhattan's Tree, an Episode

A Lady Friend

Fire and Folly

Monkey Boy

Gerymander

Fire Company, Frolic and Reflections


From a River to a Race-course.

From a River to a Racecourse.

FROM RICHMOND TO NEW YORK.

FROM RICHMOND TO NYC.

Down the River

WILLIAMSBURG. Old Palace

A Governor and a Paddy

The College

Uncle Ben and his Inn

Reflections

SHIRLEY, Hospitality, &c.

BEANDON, Hospitality, &c.

Rural Election—A Cruise in a Calm

Choral Warblers and Family Altar

NORFOLK, Dockyard, &c.

Slave Servants, a Hint to the Foreign Office

Via
BALTIMORE to PHILADELPHIA—A Confession.

Race—Mac and Tac

NEW YORK

Home of the Pilgrim Fathers.

Home of the Pilgrim Fathers.

FROM NEW YORK TO BOSTON.

From NYC to Boston.

Off by rail—Foxhunting Fire

BOSTON. Buildings and Hospitality

Neighbourhood and Names

The Drama

Spirit-rapping and Gulls

Teaching of Youth and a Model Jail.

Teaching Young People and a Model Jail.

AT BOSTON.

In Boston.

Pilgrim Fathers

Education—Expenditure—Regulations, &c.

Phonetic System

A Model Jail—Telegraph and Fire—Dockyard

Water Supply, Prosperity, &c.


Canada.

Canada.

FROM BOSTON TO QUEBEC.

From Boston to Quebec.

Railroad and Scenery

MONTREAL, and a Welcome Face

Gavazzi—Excitement—Mob, &c.

QUEBEC and Neighbourhood Mrs. Paul and Miss Paddy

Ferry-boat and Friends

Rebellion Losses Bill

Moral Courage and Administrative Ability evidenced and acknowledged

Hint for Militia

Canadian Government


A Trip to the Uttáwa.

A Trip to Ottawa.

FROM QUEBEC TO TORONTO.

FROM QUEBEC TO TORONTO.

Mr. Hincks—Mr. Drummond—MONTREAL

Up the OTTAWAY to LACHINE, ST. ANNE'S to BYTOWN and AYLMER

The CHATS FALLS

Canadian Highlanders

Conflagration, Rafts, Lumberers, and Teetotallers

The Struggle, the Goal, and the Return

AYLMER Prosperity

BYTOWN. Scenery and Advantages

Slides for Lumber—Mr. Mackay

Object of Councillor's Visit

Drive across Country

PRESCOTT and OGDENSBURG

KINGSTON

LAKE ONTARIO and a Nice Bed

TORONTO

Colonial Education and Prosperity.

Colonial Education and Wealth.

AT TORONTO.

At Toronto.

TORONTO. Population, Prosperity and Buildings

The Normal School

Education generally Canadian Prospects and Prosperity


A Cataract and a Celebration.

A Cataract and a Celebration.

FROM TORONTO TO NEW YORK.

Toronto to New York.

Embark in Steamer

QUEENSTOWN & LEWISTOWN

A Drive, a Bait, and a Lesson

NIAGARA and Moonlight

BATAVIA, GENESEO, and 4th July

Hawking Carriages—ROCHESTER

ALBANY—Hands and Sandwiches

Dropped outside—NEW YORK


Education, Civil and Military.

Education, Civil, and Military.

NEW YORK AND WEST POINT.

New York and West Point.

Free Academy

WEST POINT. Military Academy

Anecdote, &c.

NEW YORK


Here travelling ceases, and the remaining Chapters are devoted to the discussion of subjects which I trust may interest the reader.

Here travel ends, and the remaining chapters focus on topics that I hope will interest the reader.


Watery Highways and Metallic Intercourse.

Waterways and Metal Connections.

Area of Lakes, and Tonnage thereon

Mississippi—Produce borne and destroyed

Mr. Douglas and Custom Houses

A Great Party Doctrine

Erie Canal—Barn-burners and Hunkers

Railways—United States and England

Telegraph

Systems of Telegraph

America's Press and England's Censor.

US Media and UK Censorship.

Issues of the Press

Wonderful Statistics

Character of the Press

Great Britain's Press

Low Literature of America

Barefaced Robbery—
Northwood
Specimen

English Items
Specimen

The Author of
English Items

SUBJECTS EXTRACTED:—

Relations with the UK

Sixpenny Miracles

Army Commissions—English Writers

American Saliva

Sacred Sites

English friends

Original Sin

British Etiquette

Church of England and Heraldry

Dinner Devotion

Conclusion

Subsequent Career of Mr. Ward—The Offence—The Scene and the Death

Acquittal and Effects


The Institution of Slavery.

Slavery.

Original Guilt

Northern Fanatics

Irritation produced

Northern Friendship questioned

Grounds of Southerners' Objections to the Abolitionists

English Abolitionists

Mrs. Stowe's Ovation

Treatment of Slaves

Irresponsible Power and Public Opinion

Sources of Opinion as to Treatment of Slaves—Law—Self-interest

Christianity

Habit

Causes of Indignation

Recrimination

Evidence from Authors—Press and Canada

Review of Progress of Slavery

Slave Population and Value

Question of Freedom


Hints for Master and Hopes for Slave.

Tips for the Master and Aspirations for the Slave.

PROPOSALS.

Free Soil

Fugitive Rights

Refuge Area

TREATMENT DISCUSSED.

Corporal Punishment

Forfeiture and Testimony

System for Ultimate Freedom

The Darkest Aspect of Slavery

VISIONARY DEPUTATION

Chronic Slave Owner

Sensitive Slaveholder, and Arrogant Bully

Clerical Workers' Advocate

Friendly Gardener

Reclaimer

Abolitionist and Enlightened Slaveowner

A scary question

Final Thoughts

Nebraska—The Christian and the Mussulman


Constitution of the United States.

U.S. Constitution.

Plan Proposed

Government and Qualification for Office

Elective Franchise

Frequency of Elections

Ballot

Effects of Elections under the Ballot

Remedy proposed

John Randolph, Sydney Smith, and Clubs

Payment of Members and its Effects

Scene in Congress

The Judiciary

Exclusion of Cabinet from Seats

Power of President

Election of President

Governors of States, and Power of Pardon

Conclusion and Testimony of Bishop Hopkins


The Church, the School, and the Law.

The Church, the School, and the Law.

Church Statistics

American Episcopal Prayer-Book

Methodist Episcopacy and Presbyterian Music

What exists at Home

Ismite Convention

Education Statistics and College Expenses

Pray read this—Law for Conveyance of Land


Inventions and Inveighings.

Innovations and Critiques.

What is a Bay?

Dr. King—Fulton and Steam

Telegraph and American Modesty

Reaping Machine

Opinion of a Borderer

American Ingenuity

Fire-arms and Militia

Adverse Influences.

Negative Influences

The 4th July

Mr. Douglas and Congress

Miss Willard and John Mitchell

Who are the Antipathists?


Olla Podrida.

Mixed stew

American Vanity

American Sensitiveness

American Morals

Territory and Population

Effect of Early Education

Phases of Liberty

Strikes

Intelligence

Energy

'Cuteness and Eggs

Enterprise—Lord-hunting

Hospitality—Political Parties

Know-nothings

The Future

My Endeavour

My Warning

Lord Holland, Hope, and Farewell


EXTENT OF TELEGRAPH IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

A SHORT SKETCH OF THE PROGRESS OF FIRE-ARMS


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:


"An inquisitive mind never tires in the quest for knowledge."
ANTONIO PEREZ. (Translation)



EXPLANATORY LIST OF PLATES.


VIGNETTE OF THE ENTRANCE TO A COFFEE PLANTER'S RESIDENCE

VIGNETTE OF THE ENTRANCE TO A COFFEE PLANTER'S RESIDENCE

RAILWAY CARRIAGE

Train car

LOCOMOTIVE

TRAIN

CUTTER YACHT "MARIA"

Cutter Yacht "Maria"

The dimensions mentioned in the text as being on

engraving:

    Tonnage by displacement      137      tons  
    Length on deck               110      feet  
    Breadth of beam               26-1/2   "  
    Depth of hold                  8-1/4   "  
    Length of mast                91       "  
    Length of boom                95       "  
    Length of gaff                50      feet  
    Length of jibboom             70       "  
    Length of bowsprit on board   27       "  
    Diameter of bowsprit          24      in.  
    Diameter of boom              26      in.  

MAP OF CROTON AQUEDUCT

Croton Aqueduct Map

This map is faithfully reproduced from Mr. Schramke's scientific work, but

The reader is asked to understand that the lines drawn on the right

views from all over Manhattan Island reflect what the city of

New York is meant to be. Right now, its boundaries barely go beyond No.
1. Distributing Reservoir.

STEWARDESS OF THE "LADY FRANKLIN"

FLIGHT ATTENDANT OF THE "LADY FRANKLIN"

This print might be a bit exaggerated.

A MISSISSIPPI STEAMER

A Mississippi steamboat

This print is exaggerated beyond measure, intended to provide

a clearer understanding of the scenes on board than what the sheet can show

would otherwise have allowed. If the cabin on the deck of the Hudson

River steamers were raised on pillars about 15 to 20 feet high, it

would provide a fairly accurate impression of the appropriate

proportions.

THE NEW ST. CHARLES HOTEL, NEW ORLEANS

THE NEW ST. CHARLES HOTEL, NEW ORLEANS

EL CASERO, OR THE PARISH HAWKER IN CUBA

EL CASERO, OR THE PARISH HAWKER IN CUBA

THE GERARD COLLEGE, PHILADELPHIA

Gerard College, Philadelphia

NORMAL SCHOOL, TORONTO

Teacher's College, Toronto

A large part of the surrounding land is now dedicated to

agricultural research purposes.

HUDSON RIVER STEAMER, 1200 TONS

HUDSON RIVER STEAMER, 1,200 TONS

The dimensions are:—

    Length                325 feet  
    Breadth                38  "  
    Depth of hold          11  "  
    Width of cylinder      5 ft. 10 in.  
    Length of stroke       14 feet  
    Diameter of wheel      40  "  

MAP OF THE UNITED STATES

USA MAP


A CHAPTER,

Gratis and Explanatory.




What is the use of a preface? Who wants a preface? Nay, more—what is a preface? Who can define it? That which it is most unlike is the mathematical myth called a point, which may be said to have neither length nor breadth, and consequently no existence; whereas a preface generally has extreme length, all the breadth the printer can give it, and an universal existence.

What’s the point of a preface? Who needs a preface? In fact, what even is a preface? Who can really define it? The thing it’s least like is the mathematical idea of a point, which is said to have no length or width, and therefore doesn’t exist; meanwhile, a preface is usually really long, as wide as the printer can make it, and exists universally.

But if prefaces cannot be described with mathematical accuracy, they admit of classification with most unmathematical inaccuracy. First, you have a large class which may be called CLAIMERS. Ex.: One claims a certain degree of consideration, upon the ground that it is the author's first effort; a second claims indulgence, upon the ground of haste; a third claims attention, upon the ground of the magnitude and importance of the subject, &c. &c. Another large class may be termed MAKERS. Ex.: One makes an excuse for tediousness; a second makes an apology for delay; a third makes his endeavours plead for favourable reception, &c. Then again you have the INTERROGATOR, wherein a reader is found before the work is printed, convenient questions are put into his mouth, and ready replies are given, to which no rejoinder is permitted. This is very astute practice.—Then again there is the PUFFER AND CONDENSER, wherein, if matter be wanting in the work, a prefacial waggon is put before the chapteral pony, the former acting the part of pemican, or concentrated essence, the latter representing the liquid necessary for cooking it; the whole forming a potage au lecteur, known among professional men as "soldier's broth."

But if prefaces can’t be described with mathematical precision, they can definitely be categorized with a lot of imprecision. First, there’s a large group that could be called CLAIMERS. For example, one person claims a certain level of consideration because it’s the author’s first work; another asks for leniency due to haste; a third calls for attention based on the size and importance of the topic, etc. Another big group can be termed MAKERS. For instance, one makes an excuse for being boring; another apologizes for the delay; a third expects their efforts to earn a warm reception, and so on. Then there’s the INTERROGATOR, where a reader is lined up before the book is published, convenient questions are posed for them, and ready answers are provided, with no chance for follow-up. This is quite a clever tactic. Lastly, there’s the PUFFER AND CONDENSER, where, if the work is lacking in content, a preface is put in front like a cart before a pony, with the former acting as a concentrated essence, and the latter representing the liquid needed to cook it; the whole thing makes a potage au lecteur, known among professionals as "soldier’s broth."

My own opinion on this important point is, that a book is nothing more nor less than a traveller; he is born in Fact or Fancy; he travels along a goose-quill; then takes a cruise to a printer's. On his return thence his health is discovered to be very bad; strong drastics are applied; he is gradually cooked up; and when convalescent, he puts on his Sunday clothes, and struts before the public. At this critical juncture up comes the typish master of the ceremonies, Mr. Preface, and commences introducing him to them; but knowing that both man and woman are essentially inquisitive, he follows the example of that ancient and shrewd traveller who, by way of saving time and trouble, opened his address to every stranger he accosted, in some such manner as the following:—"Sir, I am Mr. ----, the son of Mr. ----, by ----, his wife and my mother. I left ---- two days ago. I have got ---- in my carpet-bag. I am going to ---- to see Mr. ----, and to try and purchase some ----." Then followed the simple question for which an answer was wanted, "Will you lend me half-a-crown?" "Tell me the road;" "Give me a pinch of snuff;" or "Buy my book," as the case might be. The stranger, gratified with his candour, became immediately prepossessed in his favour. I will endeavour to follow the example of that 'cute traveller, and forestall those questions which I imagine the reader—if there be one—might wish to ask.

In my opinion, a book is just like a traveler; it's created from reality or imagination. It travels through the ink of a quill and then goes to a printer. When it comes back, it's not looking too good; it gets a thorough edit, is gradually polished up, and once it's all set, it dresses up to show itself off to the world. At this crucial moment, the typical host of the event, Mr. Preface, steps in to introduce it to everyone. Knowing that both men and women are naturally curious, he follows the lead of that clever ancient traveler who, to save time and effort, introduced himself to every stranger he met like this: “Hi, I’m Mr. ----, the son of Mr. ----, by ----, his wife and my mother. I left ---- two days ago. I have ---- in my bag. I’m going to ---- to see Mr. ---- and try to buy some ----.” Then came the straightforward question for which he wanted an answer, like “Will you lend me a couple of coins?” “Can you tell me the way?” “Do you have a bit of snuff?” or “Want to buy my book?”, depending on the situation. The stranger, pleased with his honesty, quickly started to like him. I’ll try to do the same as that clever traveler and answer any questions I think the reader—if there is one—might have.

1. Why do I select a subject on which so many abler pens have been frequently and lately employed?—Because it involves so many important questions, both socially and politically, in a field where the changes are scarcely less rapid than the ever-varying hues on the dying dolphin; and because the eyes of mankind, whether mental or visual, are as different as their physiognomies; and thus those who are interested in the subject are enabled to survey it from different points of view.

1. Why do I choose a topic that many more skilled writers have frequently and recently tackled?—Because it raises so many important social and political questions in a field where changes happen almost as quickly as the ever-shifting colors of a dying dolphin; and because people’s perspectives, whether intellectual or visual, vary just like their appearances; allowing those interested in the subject to explore it from different angles.

2. Do I belong to any of those homoeopathic communities called political parties?—I belong to none of them; I look upon all of them as so many drugs in a national apothecary's shop. All have their useful qualities, even the most poisonous; but they are frequently combined so injudiciously as to injure John Bull's health materially, especially as all have a strong phlebotomizing tendency, so much so, that I often see poor John in his prostration ready to cry out, "Throw Governments to the dogs—I'll none of them!" If in my writings I appear to show on some points a political bias, it is only an expression of those sentiments which my own common sense[B] and observation have led me to entertain on the subject under discussion, and for which I offer neither defence nor apology.

2. Do I belong to any of those homeopathic communities called political parties?—I belong to none of them; I see them all as different medications in a national pharmacy. Each has its benefits, even the most harmful ones; but they are often mixed so poorly that they seriously harm John Bull's health, especially since they all have a strong tendency to drain him. I often see poor John, in his weakened state, ready to shout, "Throw governments to the dogs—I don't want any of them!" If my writings seem to show a political bias on certain issues, it's just an expression of the thoughts that my own common sense[B] and observation have led me to form on the topic being discussed, and I offer no defense or apology for it.

3. Am I an artist?—No; I am an author and a plagiarist. Every sketch in my book is taken from some other work, except the "Screecher," which is from the artistic pen of Lady G.M.; and the lovely form and features of the coloured sylph, for which I am indebted to my friend Mr. J.F.C.—You must not be too curious.—I consider myself justified in plagiarizing anything from anybody, if I conceive it will help to elucidate my subject or amuse my reader, provided always I have a reasonable ground for believing the source is one with which the general reader is not likely to be acquainted. But when I do steal, I have the honesty to confess it.

3. Am I an artist?—No; I'm a writer and a copycat. Every illustration in my book is borrowed from another source, except the "Screecher," which comes from the talented pen of Lady G.M.; and the beautiful figure and features of the colored sprite, which I owe to my friend Mr. J.F.C.—Don't be too curious.—I believe it's fine to borrow anything from anyone if I think it will clarify my topic or entertain my readers, as long as I have a good reason to believe that the source isn't something the average reader is likely to know. But when I do take something, I’m honest about it.

4. What is my book about?—It treats of an island, a confederacy and a colony; and contains events of travel, facts and thoughts concerning people, telegraphs, railroads, canals, steam, rivers, commercial prosperity, education, the Press, low literature, slavery, government, &c. &c.

4. What is my book about?—It explores an island, a confederation, and a colony; and includes experiences of travel, information and ideas about people, telegraphs, railroads, canals, steam, rivers, economic success, education, the press, low-quality literature, slavery, government, etc.

5. What security can I offer for the pretensions advanced being made good?—None whatever. Who takes me, must take me, like a wife, "for better for worse," only he is requested to remember I possess three distinct advantages over that lady.—First, you can look inside me as well as out: Secondly, you can get me more easily and keep me more cheaply: Thirdly, if you quarrel with me, you can get a divorce in the fire-place or at the trunkmaker's, without going to the House of Lords.

5. What security can I provide for the claims being made?—None at all. If you take me, you have to accept me, like a spouse, "for better or for worse," but I ask you to remember I have three distinct advantages over that woman.—First, you can see both my inside and outside: Second, you can get me more easily and keep me at a lower cost: Third, if we argue, you can end things in the fireplace or at the trunkmaker's, without needing to go to the House of Lords.

I trust I have now satisfied all the legitimate demands of curiosity.

I believe I have now fulfilled all the valid demands of curiosity.

I will only further remark that in some of my observations upon, the United States, such as travelling and tables-d'hôte, the reader must bear in mind that in a land of so-called equality, whenever that principle is carried out, no comparison can be drawn accurately between similar subjects in the Republic and in England.

I will only add that in some of my observations about the United States, like traveling and communal dining, the reader should keep in mind that in a country that claims to be equal, whenever that principle is truly applied, no accurate comparison can be made between similar situations in the Republic and in England.

The society conveyed in one carriage in the States embraces the first, second, and third-class passengers of Great Britain; and the society fed at their tables-d'hôte contains all the varieties found in this country, from the pavilion to the pot-house. If we strike a mean between the extremes as the measure of comfort thus obtained, it is obvious, that in proportion as the traveller is accustomed to superior comforts in this country, so will he write disparagingly of their want in the States, whereas people of the opposite extreme will with equal truth laud their superior comforts. The middle man is never found, for every traveller either praises or censures. However unreasonable it might be to expect the same refinements in a Republic of "Equal rights," as those which exist in some of the countries of the Old World under a system more favourable to their development, it is not the less a traveller's duty to record his impressions faithfully, leaving it to the reader to draw his own conclusions.

The society found in one carriage in the States includes first, second, and third-class passengers from Great Britain; and the dining experiences at their shared tables feature all the different types one can find in this country, from fancy places to dive bars. If we look for a balance between the extremes as a standard of comfort, it's clear that the more accustomed a traveler is to better comforts in this country, the more critical they'll be of the lack of them in the States, while those from the opposite end will just as truthfully praise their better comforts. The average traveler is never there, as every person either praises or criticizes. While it might seem unreasonable to expect the same level of refinement in a Republic of "Equal rights" as in some countries in the Old World where the system supports their development, it is still the traveler's responsibility to share their honest impressions, leaving it to the reader to form their own opinions.

It was suggested to me to read several works lately published, and treating of the United States; but as I was most anxious to avoid any of that bias which such reading would most probably have produced, I have strictly avoiding so doing, even at the risk of repeating what others may have said before.

It was suggested to me to read several recently published works about the United States, but since I was eager to avoid any bias that such reading might create, I strictly avoided doing so, even if it meant repeating what others may have said before.

I have nothing further to add in explanation.—The horses are to.—The coach is at the door.—Chapter one is getting in.—To all who are disposed to accompany me in my journey, I say—Welcome!

I have nothing more to explain.—The horses are ready.—The coach is at the door.—Chapter one is boarding.—To everyone who wants to join me on my journey, I say—Welcome!

H.A.M.

H.A.M.

D 4, ALBANY, LONDON,

D 4, Albany, London,

1st June, 1855.

June 1, 1855.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Perhaps "human instinct" might be a more modest expression.



CHAPTER I.

"Make ready ... Fire!" The Departure.




The preparations for the start of a traveller on a long journey are doubtless of every variety in quality and quantity, from the poor Arab, whose wife carries his house as well as all his goods—or perhaps I should rather say, from Sir Charles Napier of Scinde with his one flannel waistcoat and his piece of brown soap—up to the owners of the Dover waggon-looking "fourgon" who carry with them for a week's trip enough to last a century. My weakness, reader, is, I believe, a very common one, i.e., a desire to have everything, and yet carry scarce anything.

The preparations for a traveler about to embark on a long journey vary widely in quality and quantity, from the poor Arab, whose wife carries their home along with all their belongings—or maybe I should say, from Sir Charles Napier of Scinde with his single flannel waistcoat and a bar of brown soap—up to the owners of the Dover wagon, looking like a "fourgon" who bring enough stuff for a week-long trip to last a century. My weakness, dear reader, is, I believe, quite common; that is, a desire to have everything while barely carrying anything at all.

The difficulties of this arrangement are very perplexing to your servant, if you have one, as in my case. First you put out every conceivable article on the bed or floor, and then with an air of self-denial you say, "There, that will be enough;" and when you find an additional portmanteau lugged out, you ask with an air of astonishment (which may well astonish the servant), "What on earth are you going to do with that?" "To put your things into it, sir," is the very natural, reply; so, after a good deal of "Confound it, what a bore," &c., it ends in everything being again unpacked, a fresh lot thrown aside, and a new packing commenced; and believe me, reader, the oftener you repeat this discarding operation, the more pleasantly you will travel. I speak from experience, having, during my wanderings, lost everything by shipwreck, and thus been forced to pass through all the stages of quantity, till I once more burdened myself as unnecessarily as at starting.

The challenges of this setup are really confusing for your servant, if you have one, like I do. First, you spread out everything you can think of on the bed or floor, and then, pretending to be minimalistic, you say, "Okay, that should be enough." But when you find another suitcase dragged out, you ask in disbelief (which might surprise the servant), "What on earth are you going to do with that?" The very reasonable reply is, "To put your things in it, sir." So, after a lot of grumbling about how annoying it is, it ends up with everything being unpacked again, some items tossed aside, and a fresh packing attempt starting. And believe me, reader, the more you go through this process of discarding, the more enjoyable your travels will be. I know this from experience, having lost everything in a shipwreck during my travels, and I was forced to deal with all the stages of packing until I once again overloaded myself just like I did at the beginning.

It was a lovely September morning in 1852, when, having put my traps through the purging process twice, and still having enough for half-a-dozen people, I took my place in the early train from Euston-square for Liverpool, where I was soon housed in the Adelphi. A young American friend, who was going out in the same steamer on the following morning, proposed a little walk before the shades of evening closed in, as he had seen nothing of the city. Off we started, full of intentions never to be realized: I stepped into a cutler's shop to buy a knife; a nice-looking girl in the middle of her teens, placed one or two before me; I felt a nudge behind, and a voice whispered in my ear, "By George, what a pretty hand!" It was perfectly true; and so convinced was my friend of the fact, that he kept repeating it in my ear. When my purchase was completed, and the pretty hand retired, my friend exhibited symptoms of a strong internal struggle: it was too much for him. At last he burst out with, "Have you any scissors?"—Aside to me, "What a pretty little hand!"—Then came a demand for bodkins, then for needles, then for knives, lastly for thimbles, which my friend observed were too large, and begged might be tried on her taper fingers. He had become so enthusiastic, and his asides to me were so rapid, that I believe he would have bought anything which those dear little hands had touched.

It was a beautiful September morning in 1852 when, after clearing out my bags twice and still having enough stuff for half a dozen people, I took the early train from Euston Square to Liverpool, where I quickly checked into the Adelphi. A young American friend, who was catching the same steamer the next morning, suggested we take a little walk before night fell, since he hadn’t seen anything of the city. We set off, full of plans we’d never get around to: I popped into a cutlery shop to buy a knife; a pretty girl in her mid-teens showed me a couple of options; then I felt a nudge from behind, and a voice whispered in my ear, “Wow, what a pretty hand!” It was completely true; my friend was so convinced of it that he kept repeating it to me. Once I made my purchase and the pretty hand moved away, my friend showed signs of a serious internal struggle: he couldn’t handle it. Finally, he blurted out, “Do you have any scissors?”—then to me, “What a cute little hand!” Then he asked for bodkins, then needles, then knives, and finally thimbles, which he noted were too big and suggested trying on her delicate fingers. He had become so excited, and his side comments to me were coming so fast that I think he would have bought anything those sweet little hands had touched.

Paterfamilias, who, while poring over his ledger, had evidently had his ears open, now became alarmed at the reduction that was going on in his stock, and consequently came forward to scrutinize the mysterious purchaser. I heard a voice muttering "Confound that old fellow!" as the dutiful daughter modestly gave place to papa; a Bank of England tenner passed from my friend's smallclothes to the cutler's small till, and a half-crown vice versa. When we got to the door it was pitch dark; and thus ended our lionizing of the public buildings of Liverpool.

Paterfamilias, who was intently focused on his ledger but clearly had his ears open, suddenly became worried about the drop in his stock and stepped forward to take a closer look at the mysterious buyer. I heard someone muttering, "Damn that old guy!" as the dutiful daughter quietly stepped aside for her father; a ten-pound note from the Bank of England slipped from my friend's pocket into the cutler's small cash drawer, and a half-crown went the other way. When we reached the door, it was pitch black outside, and that’s how our tour of Liverpool’s public buildings came to an end.

On the way back to the hotel, as my companion was thinking aloud, I heard him alternately muttering in soft tones, "What a pretty hand," and then, in harsh and hasty tones, '"Confound," ... "crusty old fellow;" and reflecting thereon, I came to the conclusion that if the expressions indicated weakness, they indicated that pardonable civilizing weakness, susceptibility to the charms of beauty; and I consequently thought more kindly of my future fellow-traveller. In the evening we were joined by my brother and a young officer of the Household Brigade, who were to be fellow-passengers in our trip across the Atlantic.

On the way back to the hotel, as my companion was thinking out loud, I heard him alternating between quietly saying, "What a pretty hand," and then suddenly exclaiming in rough, quick tones, "Confound," ... "crusty old fellow;" and reflecting on this, I concluded that if those statements showed weakness, they revealed a forgivable, civilized weakness—an appreciation for beauty; and so I had a more positive opinion of my future travel buddy. In the evening, my brother and a young officer from the Household Brigade joined us, and they were going to be our fellow passengers on the trip across the Atlantic.

Early morning witnessed a procession of hackney coaches, laden as though we were bent on permanent emigration. Arrived at the quay, a small, wretched-looking steamer was lying alongside, to receive us and our goods for transport to the leviathan lying in mid-channel, with her steam up ready for a start.

Early morning saw a line of horse-drawn carriages, packed as if we were planning to leave for good. When we got to the dock, a small, miserable-looking steamship was waiting for us and our belongings to take us to the huge ship anchored in the middle of the channel, with steam already up and ready to go.

The operation of disposing of the passengers' luggage in this wretched little tea-kettle was amusing enough in its way. Everybody wanted everybody else's traps to be put down, below, and their own little this, and little that, kept up: one group, a man, wife, and child, particularly engaged my attention; the age of the child, independent of the dialogue, showed that the honeymoon was passed.

The process of getting the passengers' luggage out of this tiny little tea kettle was entertaining in its own way. Everyone wanted their bags to be put down below while keeping their own little things up top: one group, a man, woman, and child, really caught my eye; the child’s age, aside from their conversation, clearly showed that the honeymoon phase was over.

WIFE.—"Now, William, my dear, do keep that little box up!"

WIFE.—"Now, William, my dear, please keep that little box up!"

HUSBAND.—"Hi! there; keep that hat-box of mine up!" (Aside,) "Never mind your box, my dear, it wont hurt."

HUSBAND.—"Hey! Keep my hat box up!" (Aside,) "Don't worry about your box, sweetheart, it won't cause any harm."

WIFE.—"Oh, William, there's my little cap-box going down! it will be broken, in pieces."

WIFE.—"Oh, William, there goes my little cap box! It's going to be in pieces."

HUSBAND.—"Oh! don't be afraid, my dear, they'll take care of it. Stop, my man, that's my desk; give it me here," &c. &c.

HUSBAND.—"Oh! don't worry, my dear, they'll handle it. Hey, that's my desk; give it to me," &c. &c.

The dialogue was brought to a sudden stop by the frantic yell of the juvenile pledge of their affections, whose years had not yet reached two figures; a compact little iron-bound box had fallen on his toe, and the poor little urchin's pilliloo, pilliloo, was pitiful. Mamma began hugging and kissing, while papa offered that handy consolation of, "Never mind, that's a good boy; don't cry." In the meantime, the Jacks had profited by the squall, and, when it ceased, the happy couple had the satisfaction of seeing all their precious boxes buried deep in the hold.

The conversation was abruptly interrupted by the frantic shout of the young child pledging their love, who was still under ten; a small, sturdy box had dropped on his toe, and the poor little kid's cries were heart-wrenching. Mom started hugging and kissing him, while Dad provided the usual comfort of, "It's okay, that's a good boy; don’t cry." Meanwhile, the Jacks had taken advantage of the chaos, and when it calmed down, the happy couple felt satisfied seeing all their precious boxes safely stored away in the hold.

The stream of luggage having stopped, and the human cargo being all on board, we speedily cast off our lashings, and started: fortunately, it was fine weather, for, had there been rain, our ricketty tea-kettle would have afforded us no protection whatever. On reaching the leviathan, the passengers rushed up hastily, and, armed with walking-sticks or umbrellas, planted themselves like sentries on the deck. As the Jacks came tumbling up with the luggage, shouts of "Hi! that's mine," rent the air; and if Jack, in the hurry and confusion, did not attend to the cry, out would dart one or other with umbrella or stick, as the case might be, and harpoon him under the fifth rib; for, with a heavy burden on his head and shoulders, necessarily supported by both hands, defence was impossible. I must say, Jack took it all in good humour, and filing a bill "STOMACH v. RIBS," left it to Old Neptune to obtain restitution for injuries inflicted on his sons. I believe those who have once settled their accounts with that sea-deity are not more anxious to be brought into his court again, than those who have enjoyed the prolonged luxury of a suit in Chancery.

The flow of luggage having stopped and everyone on board, we quickly untied our ropes and started moving. Luckily, the weather was nice; if it had rained, our shaky tea kettle wouldn’t have given us any protection at all. When we reached the huge ship, the passengers rushed up quickly, and armed with walking sticks or umbrellas, they positioned themselves like guards on the deck. As the crew came tumbling up with the luggage, shouts of "Hey! That's mine," filled the air. If a crew member didn’t hear someone’s shout in the rush, someone with an umbrella or stick would dart out and jab him under the ribs; with a heavy load on his head and shoulders and both hands occupied, he couldn’t defend himself. I must say, the crew member took it all in stride, and filing a bill "STOMACH v. RIBS," left it to Old Neptune to get compensation for the injuries done to his crew. I believe those who have once settled their disputes with that sea god are no more eager to face him in court again than those who have enjoyed the drawn-out luxury of a lawsuit in Chancery.

Everything must have an end; so, the mail agent arriving with his postal cargo, on goes the steam, and off goes the "Africa," Captain Harrison.

Everything has to come to an end; so, the mail agent arrives with his postal delivery, the steam powers up, and away goes the "Africa," Captain Harrison.

"Some wave their hands, and some start to cry,

Some grab a joint, and with a nod, say goodbye.

I am now fairly off for New York, with a brother and two friends; we have each pinned our card to the red table-cover in the saloon, to indicate our permanent positions at the festive board during the voyage. Unless there is some peculiarity in arrangement or circumstance, all voyages resemble each other so much, that I may well spare you the dullness of repetition. Stewards will occasionally upset a soup-plate, and it will sometimes fall inside the waistcoat of a "swell," who travelling for the first time, thinks it requisite to "get himself up" as if going to the Opera. People under the influence of some internal and irresistible agency, will occasionally spring from the table with an energy that is but too soon painfully exhausted, upsetting a few side dishes as their feet catch the corner of the cloth. Others will rise, and try to look dignified and composed, the hypocrisy whereof is unpleasantly revealed ere they reach the door of the saloon; others eat and drink with an ever-increasing vigour, which proves irresistibly the truth of the saying, "L'appétit vient en mangeant." Heads that walked erect, puffing cigars like human chimneys in the Mersey, hang listless and 'baccoless in the Channel (Mem., "Pride goes before a fall"). Ladies, whose rosy cheeks and bright eyes, dimmed with the parting tear, had, as they waved the last adieu, told of buoyant health and spirits, gather mysteriously to the sides of the vessel, ready for any emergency, or lie helpless in their berths, resigning themselves to the ubiquitous stewardess, indifferent even to death itself. Others, again, whose interiors have been casehardened by Old Neptune, patrol the deck, and, if the passengers are numerous, congratulate each other in the most heartless manner by the observation, "There'll be plenty of room in the saloon, if this jolly breeze continues!"

I’m now on my way to New York with my brother and two friends. We’ve each stuck our cards to the red tablecloth in the lounge to mark our permanent spots at the dining table during the trip. Unless something unusual happens, all journeys are pretty much the same, so I can save you from the boredom of repeating myself. Stewards will sometimes spill a soup bowl, and it might even end up on a "dapper" guy who’s traveling for the first time and thinks he needs to dress up like he’s going to the opera. Some people, driven by an uncontrollable urge, will suddenly jump up from the table with a burst of energy that quickly fades, knocking over a few side dishes as they trip on the edge of the tablecloth. Others will stand up and try to maintain a dignified appearance, but their fake composure is painfully exposed before they even reach the door of the lounge. Some just eat and drink with increasing enthusiasm, proving the old saying, "L'appétit vient en mangeant." Heads that were held high, puffing cigars like human chimneys in the Mersey, now droop lifelessly in the Channel (Reminder: "Pride goes before a fall"). Ladies, whose rosy cheeks and bright eyes had been dimmed with parting tears as they said their final goodbyes, gather uncertainly at the sides of the ship, ready for any emergency, or lie helpless in their cabins, surrendering to the ever-present stewardess, indifferent even to the thought of death. Others, whose stomachs have been toughened by Old Neptune, walk the deck, and if there are a lot of passengers, they heartlessly congratulate each other by saying, "There'll be plenty of room in the lounge if this nice breeze keeps up!"

All these things are familiar to most travellers, suffice it, therefore, to say, that on the present occasion Old Neptune was in a good humour, "the jolly breeze" did not last long, nor was it ever very jolly. My American friend and the Household Brigade-man tried very hard to make out that they felt sick at first, but I believe I succeeded in convincing them that it was all imagination, for they both came steadily to meals, and between them and my brother, who has the appetite of a Pawnee when at sea, I found that a modest man like myself got but "monkey's allowance" of the champagne which I had prescribed as a medicine, erroneously imagining that those internal qualms usually produced by a sea voyage would have enabled me to enjoy the lion's share.

All these things are familiar to most travelers, so I’ll just say that on this occasion, Old Neptune was in a good mood. The "jolly breeze" didn't last long, nor was it very jolly. My American friend and the Household Brigade guy tried really hard to pretend they felt sick at first, but I managed to convince them it was all in their heads, because they both kept showing up for meals. Between them and my brother, who has the appetite of a Pawnee when at sea, I found that a modest guy like me ended up with only a "monkey's allowance" of the champagne I had suggested as a remedy, mistakenly thinking that the usual discomforts of a sea voyage would let me enjoy the lion's share.

We saw nothing during the voyage but a few strange sail and a couple of icebergs, the latter very beautiful when seen in the distance, with the sea smooth as a mirror, and the sun's rays striking upon them. I felt very thankful the picture was not reversed; the idea of running your nose against an iceberg, in the middle of a dark night, with a heavy gale blowing and sea running, was anything but pleasant.

We saw nothing during the trip except for a few strange sails and a couple of icebergs, which looked really beautiful from a distance, with the sea calm like a mirror and the sun shining on them. I was really grateful the situation wasn't the other way around; the thought of hitting an iceberg in the middle of a dark night, with a strong wind blowing and rough seas, was definitely not a comforting one.

In due time we made Cape Race. I merely mention the fact for the purpose of observing that the captain, and others to whom I have spoken since, unanimously agree in condemning the position of the lighthouse; first, as not being placed on the point a vessel from Europe would make, inasmuch as that point is further north and east; and secondly, because vessels coasting northwards are not clear of danger if they trend away westward after passing the light. There may be some advantages to the immediate neighbourhood, but, for the general purposes of navigation, its position is a mistake, and has, on more than one occasion, been very nearly the cause of the wreck of one of our large steamers[C].

In due time, we reached Cape Race. I mention this just to point out that the captain and others I've talked to since are in complete agreement about the poor location of the lighthouse. First, it's not situated on the point that a ship coming from Europe would aim for, since that point is actually further north and east. Secondly, ships heading north aren’t safe if they veer west after passing the light. There might be some benefits for the local area, but for overall navigation, its location is a mistake, and it has nearly caused the wreck of one of our large steamers more than once.[C]

Early on the morning of the tenth day I heard voices outside my cabin saying, "Well, they've got the pilot on board," ergo, we must be nearing our haven. In the Channel at home you know a pilot by a foul-weather hat, a pea-coat, broad shoulders, and weather-beaten cheeks; here, the captain had told me that I could always know them by a polished beaver and a satin or silk waistcoat. When I got on deck, sure enough there was the beaver hat and the silk vest, but what struck me most, was the wearer, a slim youth, hardly out of his teens. In the distance, the New York pilot-boat, a build rendered famous by the achievements of the "America," at Cowes, lay on the water like a duck, with her canvas white as snow, and taut as a deal board. The perfect ease and nonchalance of the young pilot amused me immensely, and all went on smoothly enough till the shades of evening closed in upon us; at which time, entering the Narrows, the satin-vested youth felt himself quite nonplused, despite his taking off his beaver, and trying to scratch for knowledge; in short, had it not been for Captain Harrison, who is a first-rate seaman and navigator, as all who ever sail with him are ready to testify, we might have remained out all night: fortunately, his superior skill got us safe in, and no easy task I assure you is it, either to find the channel, or to thread your way through hosts of shipping, in one of these leviathan steamers.

Early in the morning of the tenth day, I heard voices outside my cabin saying, "Well, they've got the pilot on board," which meant we must be getting close to our destination. At home, you can spot a pilot by their storm hat, pea coat, broad shoulders, and weathered cheeks; here, the captain told me I could always recognize them by their polished beaver hats and satin or silk waistcoats. When I got on deck, sure enough, there was the beaver hat and silk vest, but what struck me most was the wearer—a slim young guy, hardly out of his teens. In the distance, the New York pilot boat—a design made famous by the "America" at Cowes—was resting on the water like a duck, its canvas as white as snow and taut like a board. I was really amused by the perfect ease and nonchalance of the young pilot, and everything went smoothly until evening fell. As we entered the Narrows, the satin-vested youth seemed completely thrown off, despite removing his beaver hat and trying to scratch for knowledge; in short, if it hadn't been for Captain Harrison, a top-notch seaman and navigator—and everyone who sails with him will back that up—we might have been stuck out all night. Fortunately, his superior skill got us in safely, and I assure you, it’s no easy task to find the channel and navigate through a sea of ships in one of these massive steamers.

I confess I formed a very low estimate of New York pilots, which was not heightened by one of the mates showing me an embossed card, with his address, which our pilot had presented to him, accompanied with an invitation to come to a soirée. As the mystery was subsequently solved, I had better give you the solution thereof at once, and not let the corps of New York pilots lie under the ban of condemnation in your minds as long as they did in mine. It turned out that the pert little youth was not an authorized pilot, but merely schooling for it; and that, when the steamer hove in sight, the true pilots were asleep, and he would not allow them to be called, but quietly slipped away in the boat, and came on board of us to try his 'prentice hand; the pilots of New York are, I believe, a most able and efficient body of men.

I admit I had a pretty low opinion of New York pilots, which wasn’t helped when one of the mates showed me an embossed card with the pilot's address, inviting him to a soirée. Since the mystery was cleared up later, I’ll just give you the explanation right now so you don’t think poorly of the New York pilots as long as I did. It turned out that the cocky young guy wasn’t an official pilot yet; he was just training for it. When the steamer came into view, the real pilots were asleep, and he wouldn’t allow them to be woken up. Instead, he quietly slipped away in a boat and came on board to try his hand at piloting. I believe the pilots of New York are actually a very capable and skilled group of men.

Here I am, reader, at New York, a new country, a new hemisphere, and pitch dark, save the lights reflected in the water from the town on either side. All of a sudden a single toll of a bell, then another, and from the lights in the windows you discover a large wooden house is adrift. On inquiry, you ascertain it is merely one of their mammoth ferry-boats; that is something to think of, so you go to bed at midnight, and dream what it will really look like in the morning.

Here I am, reader, in New York, a new place, a new hemisphere, and it's completely dark, except for the lights reflecting in the water from the town on either side. Suddenly, you hear a single toll of a bell, followed by another, and from the lights in the windows, you realize there's a large wooden house floating by. Upon asking, you find out it’s just one of their huge ferry boats; that’s something to think about, so you go to bed at midnight and dream about what it will really look like in the morning.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

I believe another lighthouse is to be erected on the proper headland.



CHAPTER II.

The Land of Stars and Stripes.




The sun had aired the opening day before I appeared on deck. What a scene! There was scarce a zephyr to ripple the noble Hudson, or the glorious bay; the latter, land-locked save where lost in the distant ocean; the former skirted by the great Babylon of America on one side, and the lovely wooded banks of Hoboken on the other. The lofty western hills formed a sharp yet graceful bend in the stream, round which a fleet of small craft, with rakish hulls and snowy sails, were stealing quietly and softly, like black swans with white wings; the stillness and repose were only broken by the occasional trumpet blast of some giant high-pressure steamer, as she dashed past them with lightning speed. Suddenly a floating island appeared in the bend of the river; closer examination proved it to be a steamer, with from twenty to twenty-five large boats secured alongside, many of them laden at Buffalo, and coming by the Erie Canal to the ocean. Around me was shipping of every kind and clime; enormous ferry-boats radiating in all directions; forests of masts along the wharves; flags of every colour and nation flying; the dingy old storehouses of the wealthy Wall-street neighbourhood, and the lofty buildings of the newer parts of the town; everything had something novel in its character, but all was stamped with go-aheadism. This glorious panorama, seen through the bright medium of a rosy morn and a cloudless sky, has left an enjoyable impression which time can never efface. But although everything was strange, I could not feel myself abroad, so strong is the power of language.

The sun had cleared by the time I stepped onto the deck. What a sight! There was hardly a breeze to ripple the majestic Hudson or the beautiful bay, which was mostly sheltered except where it met the distant ocean. On one side was the bustling heart of America, and on the other, the picturesque wooded shores of Hoboken. The tall western hills created a sharp but elegant curve in the river, around which a fleet of small boats with sleek hulls and white sails glided quietly, like black swans with white wings; the peace was only interrupted by the occasional blast of a giant high-pressure steamer as it sped past them in a flash. Suddenly, a floating island appeared in the river's bend; a closer look revealed it was a steamer with about twenty to twenty-five large boats tied alongside, many of them loaded in Buffalo and traveling via the Erie Canal to the ocean. All around me was shipping of every type and origin; huge ferry boats fanned out in all directions; forests of masts lined the docks; flags of every color and nationality waved in the air; the grim old warehouses of the affluent Wall Street area and the tall buildings of the city's newer sections stood side by side; everything had something unique about it, but all radiated a sense of progress. This stunning scene, viewed through the bright lens of a rosy morning and a cloudless sky, left an unforgettable impression that time will never erase. Yet, even though everything felt new, I couldn’t help but feel at home, as the power of language is so strong.

Taking leave of our worthy and able skipper, we landed on the soil of the giant Republic at Jersey city, where the wharves, &c., of the Cunard line are established, they not having been able to procure sufficient space on the New York side. The first thing we ran our heads against was, of course, the Custom-house; but you must not imagine, gentle reader, that a Custom-house officer in America is that mysterious compound of detective police and high-bred ferret which you too often meet with in the Old World. He did not consider it requisite to tumble everything out on the floor, and put you to every possible inconvenience, by way of exhibiting his importance; satisfied on that point himself, he impressed you with it by simple courtesy, thus gaining respect where the pompous inquisitive type of the animal would have excited ill-will and contempt. Thank heaven, the increased inter-communication, consequent upon steam-power, has very much civilized that, until lately, barbarian portion of the European family; nor do I attempt to deny that the contiguity of the nations, and the far greater number of articles paying duty, facilitating and increasing smuggling, render a certain degree of ferretishness a little more requisite on the part of the operator, and a little more patience requisite on the part of the victim.

Taking leave of our capable skipper, we arrived on the shores of the vast Republic in Jersey City, where the docks of the Cunard line are located, as they couldn’t find enough space on the New York side. The first thing we encountered was, of course, the Customs office; but you shouldn’t think, dear reader, that a Customs officer in America is that mysterious mix of detective and snooty ferret you often see in the Old World. He didn’t feel the need to tip everything out on the floor and put you through every possible hassle to show off his importance; instead, he made an impression through simple courtesy, earning respect where a pompous and nosy type would have drawn disdain and contempt. Thank goodness the increased connections from steam power have civilized that, until recently, barbaric part of the European family; and I can’t deny that the closeness of the nations, along with the much larger number of items subject to duties, encourages and increases smuggling, making a certain level of snoopiness somewhat more necessary for the officer and a bit more patience needed from the traveler.

A very few minutes polished our party off, and found us on board of the ferry-boat; none of your little fiddling things, where a donkey-cart and an organ-boy can hardly find standing-room, but a good clear hundred-feet gangway, twelve or fourteen feet broad, on each side of the engine, and a covered cabin outside each gangway, extending half the length of the vessel; a platform accommodating itself to the rise and fall of the water, enables you to drive on board with perfect ease, while the little kind of basin into which you run on either side, being formed of strong piles fastened only at the bottom, yields to the vessel as she strikes, and entirely does away with any concussion. I may here add, that during my whole travels in the States, I found nothing more perfect in construction and arrangement than the ferries and their boats, the charges for which are most moderate, varying according to distances, and ranging from one halfpenny upwards.

A few minutes wrapped up our party, and we found ourselves on board the ferry. Not one of those tiny boats where a donkey cart and an organ grinder can barely squeeze in, but a spacious hundred-foot gangway, twelve or fourteen feet wide, on each side of the engine, with a covered cabin next to each gangway that stretches half the length of the boat. A platform adjusts to the rise and fall of the water, allowing you to drive on board with complete ease, while the small basin you enter on either side is made of strong piles secured just at the bottom, letting it give way as the vessel comes in, which completely eliminates any jolting. I should mention that throughout my travels in the States, I encountered nothing better in design and setup than the ferries and their boats, with very reasonable fares that vary based on distance, starting from just half a penny.

It is difficult to say what struck me most forcibly on landing at New York; barring the universality of the Saxon tongue, I should have been puzzled to decide in what part of the world I was. The forest of masts, and bustle on the quays, reminded me of the great sea-port of Liverpool: but scarce had I left the quays, when the placards of business on the different stories reminded me of Edinburgh. A few minutes more, and I passed one of their large streets, justly called "Avenues," the rows of trees on each side reminding me of the Alamedas in the Spanish towns; but the confusion of my ideas was completed when the hackney coach was brought to a standstill, to allow a huge railway carriage to cross our bows, the said carriage being drawn by four horses, and capable of containing fifty people.

It’s hard to say what struck me the most when I landed in New York. Aside from the fact that everyone spoke English, I would have been confused about what part of the world I was in. The sea of masts and the hustle at the docks reminded me of the busy port in Liverpool. But just a short walk away, the signs for businesses on different floors made me think of Edinburgh. A few minutes later, I passed one of their wide streets, aptly named "Avenues," with rows of trees on either side that reminded me of the Alamedas in the Spanish towns. My confusion reached its peak when our cab suddenly stopped to let a huge railway carriage pass by, pulled by four horses and able to carry fifty people.

At last, with my brain in a whirl, I alighted at Putnam's hotel, where my kind friend, Mr. W. Duncan, had prepared rooms for our party; nor did his zeal in our behalf stop here, for he claimed the privilege of being the first to offer hospitality, and had already prepared a most excellent spread for us at the far-famed Café Delmonico, where we found everything of the best: oysters, varying from the "native" size up to the large American oyster, the size of a small leg of Welsh mutton—mind, I say a small leg—the latter wonderful to look at, and pleasant to the taste, though far inferior to the sweet little "native."

Finally, with my mind racing, I arrived at Putnam's hotel, where my good friend, Mr. W. Duncan, had arranged rooms for our group. His kindness didn’t stop there; he took it upon himself to be the first to offer us hospitality and had already set up a fantastic meal for us at the famous Café Delmonico, where we found everything was top-notch: oysters ranging from the "native" size to the large American oyster, which was about the size of a small leg of Welsh mutton—just a small leg, mind you. The latter was impressive to look at and tasted good, but it was nowhere near as delightful as the sweet little "native."

Here I saw for the first time a fish called "the sheep's head," which is unknown, I believe, on our side of the Atlantic. It derives its name from having teeth exactly like those of a sheep, and is a most excellent fish wherewith to console themselves for the want of the turbot, which is never seen in the American waters. Reader, I am not going to inflict upon you a bill of fare; I merely mention the giant oyster and the sheep's head, because they are peculiar to the country; and if nearly my first observations on America are gastronomic, it is not because I idolize my little interior, though I confess to having a strong predilection in favour of its being well supplied; but it is because during the whole time I was in the United States,—from my friend D., who thus welcomed me on my arrival, to Mr. R. Phelps, in whose house I lived like a tame cat previous to re-embarking for old England,—wherever I went I found hospitality a prominent feature in the American character.

Here I saw for the first time a fish called "the sheep's head," which I believe is unknown on our side of the Atlantic. It gets its name from having teeth just like those of a sheep, and it's a really good fish to enjoy when you can't find turbot, which you never see in American waters. Reader, I'm not going to bombard you with a menu; I only mention the giant oyster and the sheep's head because they are unique to the country. If my initial observations about America focus a lot on food, it's not because I overly adore my own little place, although I do have a strong preference for it being well stocked; it's because during my entire time in the United States—starting with my friend D., who welcomed me when I arrived, to Mr. R. Phelps, in whose home I lived like a pampered cat before heading back to old England—I found hospitality to be a key part of the American character wherever I went.

Having enjoyed a very pleasant evening, and employed the night in sleeping off the fumes of sociability, I awoke, for the first time, in one of the splendid American hotels; and here, perhaps, it may be as well to say a few words about them, as their enormous size makes them almost a national peculiarity.

Having had a really nice evening and spent the night sleeping off the effects of socializing, I woke up, for the first time, in one of the amazing American hotels. It might be a good idea to say a few words about them, as their massive size makes them almost a national characteristic.

The largest hotel in New York, when I arrived, was the Metropolitan, in the centre of which is a theatre; since then, the St. Nicholas has been built, which is about a hundred yards square, five stories high, and will accommodate, when completed, about a thousand people. Generally speaking, a large hotel has a ladies' entrance on one side, which is quite indispensable, as the hall entrance is invariably filled with smokers; all the ground floor front, except this hall and a reading-room, is let out as shops: there are two dining-saloons, one of which is set apart for ladies and their friends, and to this the vagrant bachelor is not admitted, except he be acquainted with some of the ladies, or receive permission from the master of the house. The great entrance is liberally supplied with an abundance of chairs, benches, &c., and decorated with capacious spittoons, and a stove which glows red-hot in the winter. Newspapers, of the thinnest substance and the most microscopic type, and from every part of the Union, are scattered about in profusion; the human species of every kind may be seen variously occupied—groups talking, others roasting over the stove, many cracking peanuts, many more smoking, and making the pavement, by their united labours, an uncouth mosaic of expectoration and nutshells, varied occasionally with cigar ashes and discarded stumps. Here and there you see a pair of Wellington-booted legs dangling over the back of one chair, while the owner thereof is supporting his centre of gravity on another. One feature is common to them all—busy-ness; whether they are talking, or reading, or cracking nuts, a peculiar energy shows the mind is working. Further inside is the counter for the clerks who appoint the rooms to the travellers, as they enter their names in a book; on long stools close by is the corps of servants, while in full sight of all stands the "Annunciator," that invaluable specimen of American mechanical ingenuity, by which, if any bell is pulled in any room, one loud stroke is heard, and the number of the room disclosed, in which state it remains until replaced; so that if everybody had left the hall, the first person returning would see at once what bells had been rung during his absence, and the numbers of the rooms they belonged to. Why this admirable contrivance has not been introduced into this country, I cannot conceive.

The largest hotel in New York, when I arrived, was the Metropolitan, which has a theater at its center; since then, the St. Nicholas has been built, measuring about a hundred yards square, five stories tall, and when finished, it will accommodate around a thousand guests. Generally, a large hotel has a ladies' entrance on one side, which is absolutely necessary, as the main entrance is usually filled with smokers. The entire ground floor front, except for this entrance hall and a reading room, is rented out as shops. There are two dining rooms, one of which is reserved for ladies and their guests, and uninvited bachelors are not allowed, unless they know some of the ladies or get permission from the hotel owner. The main entrance is furnished with plenty of chairs, benches, etc., and decorated with large spittoons and a stove that burns bright red in the winter. Newspapers, extremely thin and printed in tiny font from all over the country, are spread out everywhere; various people can be seen engaged in multiple activities—groups chatting, others huddled over the stove, many cracking peanuts, and even more smoking, collectively turning the pavement into a messy mosaic of spit and peanut shells, occasionally mixed with cigar ashes and discarded stubs. Here and there, you might see a pair of Wellington-booted legs hanging over the back of a chair while their owner balances on another chair. One common feature among them all is busyness; whether talking, reading, or cracking nuts, there's a noticeable energy showing that their minds are at work. Further inside is the counter for clerks who assign rooms to travelers as they write down names in a book; nearby, there are long stools occupied by the staff, while prominently displayed is the "Annunciator," that invaluable piece of American mechanical ingenuity, which, when any bell is rung in any room, emits a loud sound and reveals the number of the room, staying in that state until reset. This way, if everyone has left the hall, the first person to return can instantly see which bells were rung during their absence and the corresponding room numbers. I can't understand why this excellent device hasn't been introduced in this country.

The bar is one of the most—if not the most—important departments in the hotel; comparatively nothing is drunk at dinner, but the moment the meal is over, the bar becomes assailed by applicants; moreover, from morning to midnight, there is a continuous succession of customers; not merely the lodgers and their friends, but any parties passing along the street, who feel disposed, walk into the bar of any hotel, and get "a drink." The money taken at a popular bar in the course of a day is, I believe, perfectly fabulous.

The bar is one of the most—if not the most—important departments in the hotel. Hardly anyone drinks during dinner, but once the meal is over, the bar gets flooded with patrons. Plus, from morning until midnight, there’s a constant stream of customers—not just the guests and their friends, but also anyone passing by who feels like stopping in for "a drink." The revenue generated at a popular bar in a single day is truly incredible.

Scarcely less important than the bar is the barber's shop. Nothing struck me more forcibly than an American under the razor or brush: in any and every other circumstance of life full of activity and energy, under the razor or brush he is the picture of indolence and helplessness. Indifferent usually to luxury, he here exhausts his ingenuity to obtain it; shrinking usually from the touch of a nigger as from the venomed tooth of a serpent, he here is seen resigning his nose to the digital custody of that sable operator, and placing his throat at his mercy, or revelling in titillary ecstasy from his manipulations with the hog's bristles;—all this he enjoys in a semi-recumbent position, obtained from an easy chair and a high stool, wherein he lies with a steadiness which courts prolongation—life-like, yet immoveable—suggesting the idea of an Egyptian corpse newly embalmed. Never shaving myself more than once a fortnight, and then requiring no soap and water, and having cut my own hair for nearly twenty years, I never thought of going through the experiment, which I have since regretted; for, many a time and oft have I stood, in wonder, gazing at this strange anomaly of character, and searching in vain for a first cause. The barber's shop at the St. Nicholas is the most luxurious in New York, and I believe every room has its own brush, glass, &c., similarly numbered in the shop.

Scarcely less important than the bar is the barber's shop. Nothing struck me more than seeing an American under the razor or brush: in every other aspect of life, they’re full of activity and energy, but under the razor or brush, they look completely lazy and helpless. Usually indifferent to luxury, here they go all out to indulge in it; typically avoiding the touch of a Black man like it’s a snake bite, they willingly let this skilled barber handle their nose and throat, enjoying the feeling of the hog bristles as they get pampered—relaxing in a semi-reclined position on a comfortable chair and a high stool. They lie there so still, it’s almost like they’re trying to prolong the experience—lifelike, yet motionless—resembling an Egyptian mummy that’s just been embalmed. I never shaved more than once every two weeks, and then I didn’t even need soap and water, and after cutting my own hair for almost twenty years, I never thought to try it, which I’ve since regretted; many times, I’ve stood there in wonder, contemplating this strange contradiction in character and searching in vain for its origin. The barber's shop at the St. Nicholas is the most luxurious in New York, and I believe every room has its own brush, glass, etc., all numbered in the shop.

The crowning peculiarity of the new hotels is "The Bridal Chamber;" the want of delicacy that suggested the idea is only equalled by the want of taste with which it is carried out. Fancy a modest girl, having said "Yes," and sealed the assertion in the solemn services of the Church, retiring to the bridal chamber of the St. Nicholas! In the first place, retiring to an hotel would appear to her a contradiction in terms; but what would be her feelings when she found the walls of her apartment furnished with fluted white silk and satin, and in the centre of the room a matrimonial couch, hung with white silk curtains, and blazing with a bright jet of gas from each bed-post! The doors of the sleeping-rooms are often fitted with a very ingenious lock, having a separate bolt and keyhole on each side, totally disconnected, and consequently, as they can only be opened from the same side they are fastened, no person, though possessed of a skeleton key, is able to enter. The ominous warning, "Lock your door at night," which is usually hung up, coupled with the promiscuous society frequently met in large hotels, renders it most advisable to use every precaution.

The standout feature of the new hotels is "The Bridal Chamber;" the lack of sensitivity that inspired the concept is only matched by the poor taste in how it’s executed. Imagine a modest girl, who just said "Yes" and confirmed it in the solemn rites of the Church, going to the bridal chamber of the St. Nicholas! First of all, it would seem contradictory for her to go to a hotel; but how would she feel when she discovers that the walls of her room are covered in fluted white silk and satin, and in the middle of the room is a marital bed, draped with white silk curtains, and lit up by a bright gas lamp from each bedpost! The bedroom doors often come with a clever lock, featuring a separate bolt and keyhole on each side that are completely separate. So, since they can only be unlocked from the same side they are locked, no one, even with a skeleton key, can get in. The ominous sign saying, "Lock your door at night," which is usually posted, along with the mixed crowd often found in large hotels, makes it very wise to take every precaution.

Many hotels have a Bible in each bed-room, the gift of some religious community in the city; those that I saw during my travels were most frequently from the Presbyterians.

Many hotels have a Bible in each bedroom, a gift from some religious community in the city; the ones I saw during my travels were most often from the Presbyterians.

Having given you some details of an American first-class hotel in a large city, you will perhaps be better able to realize the gigantic nature of these establishments when I tell you that in some of them, during the season, they consume, in one way and another, DAILY, from fifteen hundred to two thousand pounds of meats, and from forty-five to fifty pounds of tea, coffee, &c., and ice by the ton, and have a corps of one hundred and fifty servants of all kinds. Washing is done in the hotel with a rapidity little short of marvellous. You can get a shirt well washed, and ready to put on, in nearly the same space of time as an American usually passes under the barber's hands. The living at these hotels is profuse to a degree, but, generally speaking, most disagreeable: first, because the meal is devoured with a rapidity which a pack of fox-hounds, after a week's fast, might in vain attempt to rival; and, secondly, because it is impossible to serve up dinners for hundreds without nine-tenths thereof being cold. The best of the large hotels I dined at in New York, as regards cuisine, &c., was decidedly the New York Hotel; but by far the most comfortable was the one I lived in—Putnam's, Union-square—which was much smaller and quite new, besides being removed from the racket of Broadway.

Having shared some details about an upscale hotel in a big city, you might better understand the massive scale of these places when I mention that in some of them, during peak season, they go through daily anywhere from fifteen hundred to two thousand pounds of meat, and around forty-five to fifty pounds of tea, coffee, etc., along with tons of ice, supported by a staff of one hundred and fifty workers in various roles. The laundry service at the hotel is impressively quick. You can get a shirt washed and ready to wear in almost the same time an American typically spends at the barber. The food at these hotels is abundant to the point of excess, but generally not very pleasant: first, because meals are consumed at a speed that a pack of foxhounds after a week without food couldn’t match; and second, because it’s impossible to serve dinners for hundreds without most of it being cold. The best large hotel where I dined in New York, in terms of cuisine, was definitely the New York Hotel; but by far the most comfortable place I stayed was Putnam's in Union Square, which was much smaller, brand new, and away from the noise of Broadway.

The increased intercourse with this country is evidently producing a most improving effect in many of the necessary and unmentionable comforts of this civilized age, which you find to predominate chiefly in those cities that have most direct intercourse with us; but as you go further west, these comforts are most disagreeably deficient. One point in which the hotels fail universally is attendance; it is their misfortune, not their fault; for the moment a little money is realized by a servant, he sets up in some business, or migrates westward. The consequence is, that the field of service is left almost entirely to the Irish and the negro, and between the two—after nearly a year's experience thereof—I am puzzled to say in whose favour the balance is.

The increased interaction with this country is clearly leading to a significant improvement in many of the essential and unmentionable comforts of this civilized age, which are mostly seen in the cities that have the most direct contact with us. However, as you travel further west, these comforts are noticeably lacking. One area where hotels universally fall short is in service; this is more of a misfortune than a fault. As soon as a servant makes a little money, they often start their own business or move west. As a result, the service sector is almost entirely left to the Irish and the Black community, and after nearly a year's experience with both, I'm not sure which group is better overall.

I remember poor Paddy, one morning, having answered the Household Brigade man's bell, was told to get some warm water. He went away, and forgot all about it. Of course, the bell rang again; and, on Paddy answering it, he was asked—

I remember poor Paddy, one morning, after he answered the Household Brigade man's bell, he was told to get some warm water. He left and completely forgot about it. Naturally, the bell rang again; and when Paddy answered it, he was asked—

"Did I not tell you to get me some warm water?"

"Didn't I tell you to get me some warm water?"

"You did, your honour."

"You did, your honor."

"Then, why have you not brought it?"

"Then, why didn't you bring it?"

"Can't tell, your honour."

"Can't say, your honor."

"Well, go and get it at once."

"Alright, go and get it right away."

Paddy left the room, and waited outside the door scratching his head. In about a quarter of an hour a knock was heard:—

Paddy left the room and stood outside the door, scratching his head. After about fifteen minutes, a knock was heard:—

"Come in!"

"Come on in!"

Paddy's head appeared, and, with a most inquiring voice, he said—

Paddy's head popped up, and, with a very curious tone, he asked—

"Is it warm water to dhrink you want, your honour?" Ex uno, &c.

"Is it warm water to drink that you want, your honor?" Ex uno, &c.

Another inconvenience in their hotels is the necessity of either living at the public table, or going to the enormous expense of private rooms; the comfort of a quiet table to yourself in a coffee-room is quite unknown. There is no doubt that sitting down at a table-d'hôte is a ready way to ascertain the manners, tone of conversation, and, partly, the habits of thought, of a nation, especially when, as in the United States, it is the habitual resort of everybody; but truth obliges me to confess that, after a very short experience of it, I found the old adage applicable, "A little of it goes a great way;" and I longed for the cleanliness, noiselessness, and comfort of an English coffee-room, though its table be not loaded with equal variety and profusion.

Another issue with their hotels is the need to either eat at a crowded communal table or pay a hefty price for private rooms; the comfort of having a quiet table to yourself in a coffee room is totally missing. There's no doubt that sitting at a table d'hôte is a quick way to get a sense of the manners, conversation style, and somewhat the thought processes of a nation, especially in the United States where it's the usual hangout for everyone. But honestly, I have to admit that after a very short time doing it, I found the old saying to be true: "A little of it goes a long way." I yearned for the cleanliness, quietness, and comfort of an English coffee room, even if its table isn't full of the same variety and abundance.

The American system is doubtless the best for the hotelkeeper, as there are manifest advantages in feeding masses at once, over feeding the same number in detail. A mess of twenty officers, on board a man-of-war, will live better on two pounds each a month than one individual could on three times that sum. It is the want of giving this difference due consideration which raises, from time to time, a crusade against the hotels at home, by instituting comparisons with those of the United States. If people want to have hotels as cheap as they are in America, they must use them as much, and submit to fixed hours and a mixture of every variety of cultivation of mind and cleanliness of person—which change is not likely, I trust, to take place in my day. It is a curious fact, that when the proprietor of the Adelphi, at Liverpool—in consequence of a remonstrance made by some American, gentlemen as to his charges—suggested to them that they should name their own hour and dine together, in which case his charges would be greatly diminished, they would not hear of such a thing, and wanted to know why they should be forced to dine either all together, or at one particular hour. An American gentleman, with whom I am acquainted, told me that, when he first came over to England, the feeling of solitude, while breakfasting alone, at his table in Morley's coffee-room, was quite overpowering. "Now," he added, "I look forward to my quiet breakfast and the paper every morning with the greatest pleasure, and only wonder how I can have lived so long, and been so utterly ignorant of such simple enjoyment." I have thought it better to make these observations thus early, although it must be obvious they are the results of my subsequent experience, and I feel I ought to apologize for their lengthiness.

The American system is definitely the best for hotel owners, as there are clear advantages in serving large groups at once rather than individually. A group of twenty officers on a Navy ship can eat better on two pounds each per month than one person could on three times that amount. It's the lack of attention to this difference that sparks occasional complaints about hotels at home, comparing them to those in the United States. If people want hotels as affordable as they are in America, they need to use them more and accept set meal times along with a mix of various backgrounds and levels of personal hygiene—which I hope won't change in my lifetime. It's interesting that when the owner of the Adelphi in Liverpool faced complaints about his prices from some American gentlemen, he suggested they choose their own dining time and eat together, which would lower his rates. They refused, asking why they should have to dine together or at a specific time. An American gentleman I know told me that when he first came to England, he found the feeling of loneliness while eating alone in Morley's coffee room overwhelming. "Now," he said, "I look forward to my quiet breakfast and the newspaper every morning with great enjoyment, and I can hardly believe I lived so long without such simple pleasure." I've decided to share these thoughts early on, even though it's clear they're based on my later experiences, and I apologize for their length.

There is comparatively little difficulty in finding your way about New York, or, indeed, most American towns, except it be in the old parts thereof, which are as full of twists, creeks, and names as our own. The newer part of the town is divided into avenues running nearly parallel with the Hudson; the streets cross them at right angles, and both are simply numbered; the masses of buildings which these sections form are very nearly uniform in area, and are termed blocks. The great place for lounging, or loafing, as they term it—is Broadway, which may be said to bisect New York longitudinally; the shops are very good, but, generally speaking, painfully alike, wearying the eye with sameness, when the novelty has worn off: the rivalry which exists as to the luxe of fitting up some of these shops is inconceivable.

It's relatively easy to navigate around New York or, really, most American cities, except for the older parts that are just as confusing as ours, filled with twists, turns, and quirky names. The newer sections are laid out with avenues running almost parallel to the Hudson River; the streets intersect them at right angles, and both are simply numbered. The groups of buildings in these areas are nearly uniform in size and are called blocks. The main spot for hanging out, or "loafing" as they say, is Broadway, which cuts through New York from north to south. The shops are quite good, but overall, they tend to look pretty similar, making it visually tiring after the initial excitement wears off. The competition over the luxury of decorating some of these stores is unbelievable.

I remember going into an ice-saloon, just before I embarked for England; the room on the ground-floor was one hundred and fifty feet long by forty broad; rows of pillars on each side were loaded to the most outrageous extent with carving and gilding, and the ceiling was to match; below that was another room, a little smaller, and rather less gaudy; both were crowded with the most tag-rag and bob-tail mixture of people.

I remember walking into an ice cream parlor right before I left for England; the room on the ground floor was one hundred and fifty feet long and forty wide; rows of pillars on each side were ridiculously decorated with intricate carvings and gold accents, and the ceiling matched; below that was another room, a bit smaller and not quite as flashy; both were packed with a mix of all sorts of people.

The houses are built of brick, and generally have steps up to them, by which arrangement the area receives much more light; and many people with very fine large houses live almost exclusively in these basements, only using the other apartments for some swell party: the better class of houses, large hotels, and some of the shops, have their fronts faced with stone of a reddish brown, which has a warm and pleasant appearance. The famous "Astor House" is faced with granite, and the basement is of solid granite. The most remarkable among the new buildings is the magnificent store of Mr. Stewart—one of the largest, I believe, in the world: it has upwards of one hundred and fifty feet frontage on Broadway, and runs back nearly the same distance: is five stories high, besides the basement; its front is faced with white marble, and it contains nearly every marketable commodity except eatables. If you want anything, in New York, except a dinner, go to Stewart's, and it is ten to one you find it, and always of the newest kind and pattern; for this huge establishment clears out every year, and refills with everything of the newest and best. Goods are annually sold here to the amount of upwards of a million sterling—a sum which I should imagine was hardly exceeded by any establishment of a similar nature except Morison's in London, which, I believe, averages one and a half million. Some idea of the size of this store may be formed, from the fact that four hundred gas burners are required to light it up. Mr. Stewart, I was informed, was educated for a more intellectual career than the keeper of a store, on however grand a scale; but circumstances induced him to change his pursuits, and as he started with scarce any capital, the success which has attended him in business cannot but make one regret that the world has lost the benefit which might have been anticipated from the same energy and ability, if it had been applied to subjects of a higher class.

The houses are made of brick and usually have steps leading up to them, which allows the area to get a lot more light. Many people with large, impressive homes live mostly in these basements, only using the other rooms for fancy parties. The nicer houses, big hotels, and some stores have fronts made of reddish-brown stone, giving them a warm and inviting look. The famous "Astor House" is covered with granite, and its basement is made of solid granite. One of the standout new buildings is Mr. Stewart's amazing store—one of the biggest in the world, I believe. It has a frontage of over one hundred and fifty feet on Broadway and goes back nearly that same distance. It's five stories tall, plus the basement; its front is clad in white marble, and it has almost every sellable item you can imagine, except food. If you need something in New York other than dinner, head to Stewart's, and there's a good chance you'll find it, always in the latest style and design. This massive store restocks every year with the newest and best products. Annually, it sells goods amounting to over a million pounds—a total that I doubt any similar store exceeds, except for Morison's in London, which averages about one and a half million. You can get an idea of the store's size from the fact that it needs four hundred gas burners to light it up. I was told that Mr. Stewart was educated for a more intellectual career than running a store, even a grand one. However, circumstances led him to change his path, and since he started with almost no capital, his success in business makes one lament that the world missed out on the potential benefits of his energy and talent being applied to more lofty pursuits.

I will now offer a few observations on the state of the streets. The assertion has been made by some writer—I really know not who—that New York is one of the dirtiest places in the world. To this I must give a most unqualified denial. No person conversant with many of the large provincial towns in England and Scotland, can conscientiously "throw a very large stone" at New York; for though much is doing among us to improve and sweeten—chiefly, thanks to the scourge of epidemics—I fear that in too many places we are still on this point "living in glass houses." Doubtless, New York is infinitely dirtier than London, as London at present is far less clean than Paris has become under the rule of the Third Napoleon. I fully admit that it is not so clean as it should be, considering that the sum nominally spent on cleansing the streets amounts to very nearly sixty thousand pounds a year, a sum equal to one pound for every ten inhabitants; but the solution of this problem must be looked for in the system of election to the corporation offices, on which topic I propose to make a few observations in some future portion of these pages. While on the subject of streets, I cannot help remarking that it always struck me as very curious that so intelligent a people as the Americans never adopted the simple plan of using sweeping carts, which many of their countrymen must have seen working in London. If not thoroughly efficient, their ingenuity might have made them so; and, at all events, they effect a great saving of human labour. But there is a nuisance in the streets of New York, especially in the lower and business part of the town, which must be palpable to every visitor—I mean the obstructions on the pavement; and that, be it observed, in spite of laws passed for the prevention thereof, but rendered nugatory from maladministration. In many places, you will see a man occupying the whole pavement opposite his store with leviathan boxes and bales, for apparently an indefinite period, inasmuch as I have seen the same things occupying the same place day after day, and forcing every passer-by off the pavement. This information may console some of our own communities who are labouring under the gnawing and painful disease of a similar corrupt and inefficient administration.

I’d like to share a few thoughts on the state of the streets. Some writer—I'm not sure who—has claimed that New York is one of the dirtiest places in the world. I have to strongly disagree with that. No one who’s familiar with many of the larger towns in England and Scotland can honestly criticize New York; while we are actively trying to improve cleanliness—mainly due to the threat of epidemics—we still have a lot of areas where we aren't doing great. Obviously, New York is much dirtier than London, which at the moment is also not as clean as Paris became under the Third Napoleon. I fully acknowledge that it’s not as clean as it should be, especially considering we supposedly spend close to sixty thousand pounds a year on cleaning the streets, which is about one pound for every ten residents. However, finding a solution to this issue requires looking at how we elect our city officials, a topic I plan to discuss later on. Speaking of streets, I find it quite strange that such an intelligent people as Americans haven't adopted the simple idea of using street-sweeping carts, which many of them must have seen in London. Even if they aren't perfect, they could have been improved, and they certainly save a lot of manual labor. Yet, there’s a noticeable problem in the streets of New York, especially in the downtown and business areas, that any visitor will easily notice—I'm talking about the obstructions on the sidewalks. This is happening despite laws meant to prevent it, which are ignored because of poor management. In many spots, you'll see someone blocking the entire sidewalk in front of their store with large boxes and bales for an indefinite time, as I've seen the same items in the same spot day after day, forcing everyone to walk around. This might give some comfort to our own communities struggling with a similar corrupt and ineffective administration.

Amid the variety of shops, the stranger cannot fail to be struck with the wonderful number of oyster-saloons stuck down on the basement, and daguerreotypists perched in the sky-line: their name is legion; everybody eats oysters, and everybody seems to take everybody else's portrait. To such an extent is this mania for delineating the 'human face divine' carried, that a hatter in Chatham-street has made no small profit by advertising that, in addition to supplying hats at the same price as his rivals, he will take the portrait of the purchaser, and fix it inside thereof gratis. This was too irresistible; so off I went, and, selecting my two dollar beaver on the ground-floor, walked up to a six foot square garret room, where the sun did its work as quick as light, after which the liberal artist, with that flattering propensity which belongs to the profession, threw in the roseate hues of youth by the aid of a little brick-dust. I handed him my dust in return, and walked away with myself on my head, where myself may still be daily seen, a travelled and travelling advertisement of Chatham-street enterprise.

Amid the variety of shops, the stranger can't help but notice the incredible number of oyster bars in the basements and photographers high up in the skyline: there are so many of them; everybody eats oysters, and everyone seems to be taking pictures of each other. The obsession with capturing the 'human face divine' has gotten so out of hand that a hat maker on Chatham Street has made a nice profit by advertising that, in addition to selling hats at the same price as his competitors, he will take a portrait of the buyer and put it inside the hat for free. This was too tempting to resist; so I headed over, chose my two-dollar beaver hat on the ground floor, and walked up to a six-foot-square attic room, where the sun worked its magic as quickly as lightning. After that, the generous artist, with that flattering tendency common in his profession, added a touch of youthful color using a bit of brick dust. I gave him my cash in return and walked away with my own portrait on my head, where it can still be seen every day, a traveling advertisement for Chatham Street's hustle.

Our American friends deal largely in newspaper puffs, and as some of them are amusing enough, I select the following as specimens of their "Moses and Son" style:—

Our American friends mostly focus on newspaper hype, and since some of it is quite entertaining, I’ve chosen the following as examples of their "Moses and Son" style:—

ANOTHER TERRIBLE ACCIDENT.—OH, MOM! I HAD A TERRIBLE

ACCIDENT! The other night, while dancing with my cousin Frank, I dropped

I dropped my brooch and earrings on the floor and broke them all.

Forget it, my dear. Just take them to ---- Jewellery.

Store. You can have them restored to like-new condition!

EXCITING NEWS.—We’ve just found out, with great joy, that the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

sketchy young man who hurt his back while trying to "raise the

"Wind" is quickly making a comeback because of smart application of the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

Mustang Liniment. Hopefully, he will be completely healed soon.

and that the next time he takes it on, he will take an upright

position and avoid adopting the stooping posture. This precaution, we

Rest assured, it will guarantee success.

You can get this liniment from ----.

Even, marriage and death are not exempt from the fantastic advertising style.

Even marriage and death aren't free from the flashy advertising style.

On Friday, June 10, by Rev. Mr. ----, after a serious and

a lengthy courtship that they endured with Christian patience

and resignation, fully supported and reassured, through all doubts,

by their genuine and trusting belief in the promise of a prosperous, and

living inheritance in another state, Mr. ---- to Miss ----, all of this

city

On April 4, due to brain congestion, F---- E----, son of J---- and

M---- C. D----, 14 months old.

His remains were taken to G---- for burial yesterday.

Listen! Did you hear that angel say,

As he waved his tiny wing,

"Come on, Freddy, let's go"

"Teach me a song to sing!"

The most gigantic advertiser—if the New York Daily Sun is to be trusted for information—is Professor Holloway, so well known in this country. According to that paper, he advertises in thirteen hundred papers in the United States, and has expended, in different parts of the world, the enormous sum of nearly half a million sterling, solely for that purpose.

The largest advertiser—if we can believe the New York Daily Sun—is Professor Holloway, who is widely recognized in this country. According to that paper, he places ads in thirteen hundred newspapers across the United States and has spent an astounding amount of nearly half a million pounds worldwide just for that.

But, reader, there are more interesting objects to dwell upon than these. If you will only "loaf" up and down Broadway on a fine afternoon, you will see some of the neatest feet, some of the prettiest hands, some of the brightest eyes, and some of the sweetest smiles the wildest beauty-dreamer ever beheld in his most rapturous visions; had they but good figures, they would excite envy on the Alamedas of Andalusia; in short, they are the veriest little ducks in the world, and dress with Parisian perfection. No wonder, then, reader, when I tell you that "loafing" up and down Broadway is a favourite occupation with the young men who have leisure hours to spare. So attractive did my young friend of the Household Brigade find it, that it was with difficulty he was ever induced to forego his daily pilgrimage. Alas! poor fellow, those days are gone—he has since been "caught," and another now claims his undivided adoration.

But, reader, there are more interesting things to focus on than these. If you just stroll up and down Broadway on a nice afternoon, you'll see some of the neatest feet, prettiest hands, brightest eyes, and sweetest smiles that any beauty dreamer has ever imagined in their wildest fantasies; if they had good figures, they would inspire envy in the Alamedas of Andalusia; in short, they are the cutest little ducks in the world and dress with Parisian flair. No wonder, then, reader, when I say that hanging out on Broadway is a favorite pastime for young men with free time. My young friend from the Household Brigade found it so appealing that it was hard to get him to skip his daily stroll. Alas! poor guy, those days are over—he's since been "caught," and someone else now has his full attention.


CHAPTER III.

Sights and Amusements.




There is a very pleasant yacht club at New York, the festive assembly whereof is held at Hoboken. Having received a hospitable invite, I gladly availed myself of it, and, crossing the Hudson, a short walk brought me and my chaperon to the club-house—no palatial edifice, but a rustic cottage, with one large room and a kitchen attached, and beautifully situated a few yards from the water's edge, on the woody bank of Hoboken, and on one of the most graceful bends of the river. It commands a splendid view, while perfectly cozy in itself, and is, "par excellence," the place for a pic-nic. The property belongs to Commodore Stevens, who is well known to English yachting gentlemen, not only from his having "taken the shine out of them" at Cowes, but also for his amiability and hospitality.

There’s a lovely yacht club in New York, and its lively gatherings happen in Hoboken. After receiving a warm invitation, I gladly took it, and after crossing the Hudson River, a short walk took me and my companion to the club house—not a grand building, but a charming cottage with one large room and a kitchen, pleasantly located just a few yards from the water's edge, on the wooded bank of Hoboken, and along one of the river’s most beautiful curves. It offers a fantastic view and is really cozy, making it the perfect spot for a picnic. The property belongs to Commodore Stevens, who is well-known among English yachting enthusiasts, not only for having outshone them at Cowes but also for his friendliness and hospitality.

On my arrival, I found a host of bachelors, and wedded men en garçon, ready to greet me with a hearty welcome. The room was very comfortable, but as unfurnished as those who like to smoke could desire; in fact, barring the table and its burden, the chairs and their occupiers, the remainder of the furniture consisted of models of all the yachts of the club. The only exception was that of the Commodore's triumphant "Black Maria," of which extraordinary vessel I purpose speaking more fully hereafter. One of the peculiar customs of the club is, that two members, whose capabilities are beyond dispute, are appointed, one to make the soup, called "chowder," the other the punch—or "toddy," as it is here termed,—both of these being excellent in their way, and different in many respects from any similar article at home. The proper recipe for the same shall be forthcoming when I give details of the "Black Maria."

When I arrived, I found a bunch of single guys and married men en garçon, ready to welcome me warmly. The room was quite comfortable, but as bare as those who enjoy smoking could want; actually, aside from the table and its contents, the chairs and their occupants, the rest of the furniture was made up of models of all the club's yachts. The only exception was the Commodore's impressive "Black Maria," which I plan to discuss in more detail later. One of the club's unique traditions is that two members, whose skills are beyond question, are chosen—one to make the soup, called "chowder," and the other to make the punch—or "toddy," as it’s called here—both of which are excellent in their own right and quite different from anything similar back home. The exact recipe will be provided when I give details about the "Black Maria."

Our party was a very jovial one, as I think parties generally are when composed of those who are much on the water. Such people naturally look upon a leak as very lubberly and unprofessional, and therefore scrupulously avoid letting in any water, supplying its place with something more cheery, under the enlivening influence whereof, those who would be puzzled to decide whether a hand-organ was playing "Hail, Columbia!" or "Pop goes the Weasel," lose all false modesty as to their musical powers, and become royally (I beg majesty's pardon) vocal. Choruses receive the additional charm of variety from each vocalist giving his tongue "universal suffrage" as to power, matter, and melody; everybody evinces a happy independence, and if, as the chorus is beginning, an unlucky wight finds his cigar just going out, he takes a few puffs to save the precious fire, and then starts off Derby pace to catch up his vocal colleagues, blending ten notes into one in his frantic chase.

Our party was a really cheerful one, as I think parties usually are when they’re made up of people who spend a lot of time on the water. These folks naturally see a leak as very clumsy and unprofessional, so they carefully avoid letting in any water, replacing it with something more cheerful. Under this lively atmosphere, those who might struggle to tell if a street performer is playing "Hail, Columbia!" or "Pop Goes the Weasel" lose all false modesty about their singing abilities and become quite vocal. The choruses gain extra charm because each singer adds their own unique spin on power, lyrics, and melody; everyone shows a joyful independence, and if, as the chorus begins, someone realizes their cigar is going out, they'll take a few puffs to keep the flame alive and then sprint off to catch up with their singing friends, mixing ten notes into one in their hurried pursuit.

To any one who delights in the opera, this description might suggest a slight idea of discord, but to one who has enjoyed a midshipman's berth it recals some of the cheeriest days of his life; as I heard the joyous shouts, I felt my grey lank hairs getting black and curly again (?). Do not imagine this merry scene was the produce of any excess; we were as sober as judges, though we felt their gravity would have been out of place; but when some choice spirit—and there was more than one such—with the soul of melody in him, took the field, we left him to make all the running himself, and smoked our cigars with increased vigour, shrouding him in the curling cloud to prevent any nervous hesitation.

To anyone who enjoys the opera, this description might hint at a bit of tension, but for someone who has experienced life as a midshipman, it brings back some of the happiest days of their life; as I heard the cheerful shouts, I felt my gray, thin hair turning black and curly again (?). Don't think this joyful scene was the result of any excess; we were as sober as judges, though we felt their seriousness wouldn't have fit in here. When a talented person—and there were more than a few—stepped up with a soulful voice, we let him take the lead while we smoked our cigars with renewed energy, surrounding him in a curling cloud to ease any nerves he might have had.

Everything, however, must have an end, and as the hour for the last ferry-boat was fast approaching, the voice of melody was hushed in the hall, to echo through the groves of Hoboken and o'er the waters of the Hudson, as we strolled from the club-house to the ferry, and thence to bed.

Everything, however, has to come to an end, and as the time for the last ferry was quickly approaching, the music faded in the hall, only to resonate through the parks of Hoboken and across the waters of the Hudson, as we walked from the club house to the ferry, and then off to bed.

Among other "lions" to be seen, my curiosity was excited by the news of a trotting match, to come off at Long Island: some friend was ever ready, so off we started for Brooklyn Ferry, whence we went by railway. In the olden time these races were as fashionable at New York as Ascot or Epsom are in England; all the élite of both sexes filled the stand, and the whole scene was lively and gay. Various circumstances, which all who know the turf are aware it is liable to, rendered gentlemen so disgusted with it at Long Island, that they discontinued sending horses to run, and gradually gave up going themselves, and it is now left all but entirely to the "rowdies,"—alias mob.

Among other "lions" to see, I was intrigued by the news of a trotting match happening at Long Island: a friend was always ready, so we set off for Brooklyn Ferry, and then took the train. Back in the day, these races were as popular in New York as Ascot or Epsom are in England; the whole elite, men and women alike, filled the stands, and the atmosphere was lively and cheerful. Various issues, which anyone familiar with horse racing knows can arise, left gentlemen so fed up with the races at Long Island that they stopped sending their horses to compete and gradually stopped attending themselves. Now, it’s pretty much left to the "rowdies,"—a.k.a. the mob.

The railway carriage into which we got contained about forty of these worthies, all with cigars in their mouths, and exhibiting many strange varieties of features and costume. In the passage up and down the middle of the carriage; ragged juvenile vendors of lollipops and peanuts kept patrolling and crying out their respective goods, for which they found a ready market; suddenly another youth entered, and, dispensing a fly-leaf right and left as he passed along to each passenger, disappeared at the other door. At first, I took him for an itinerant advertiser of some Yankee "Moses and Son," or of some of those medicinal quacks who strive to rob youth by lies calculated to excite their fears. Judge my astonishment, then, when on looking at the paper, I found it was hymns he was distributing. A short ride brought us close to the course, and, as I alighted, there was the active distributor freely dispensing on every side, everybody accepting, many reading, but all hurrying on to the ground.

The train carriage we boarded had around forty people inside, all with cigars in their mouths, showing off a mix of unusual looks and outfits. In the aisle of the carriage, ragged young vendors of lollipops and peanuts were moving up and down, calling out their goods, which found plenty of takers. Suddenly, another young man came in, handing out pamphlets to each passenger as he went by, then disappeared out the other door. At first, I thought he was a traveling advertiser for some American "Moses and Son," or one of those fake medicine salespeople trying to trick young people with fears. Imagine my surprise when I looked at the paper and realized he was giving out hymns. A quick ride brought us close to the racetrack, and as I got off, there was the energetic distributor freely giving out pamphlets everywhere. Everyone was accepting them, many were reading, but all were rushing on to the event.

Having paid a good round sum as entrance to the stand, I was rather disappointed at nearly breaking my neck, when endeavouring to take advantage of my privilege, for my foot well-nigh went through a hole in the flooring. Never was anything more wretched-looking in this world. It was difficult to believe, that a few years back, this stand had been filled with magnates of the "upper ten thousand" and stars of beauty: there it was before me, with its broken benches, scarce a whole plank in the floor, and wherever there was one, it was covered with old cigar stumps, shells of peanuts, orange-peel, &c. When, however, I found that seven people constituted the number of spectators in the stand, its dilapidation was more easily explained, especially when I discovered that access, with a little activity, was easily obtainable at the sides gratis—a fact soon proved by the inroad of a few "rowdies," and the ubiquitous vendors of lollipops and peanuts, headed by the persevering distributor of hymns.

Having paid a good amount to get into the stand, I was pretty disappointed when I nearly broke my neck trying to enjoy my privilege, since my foot almost went through a hole in the floor. There was nothing more miserable looking in this world. It was hard to believe that just a few years before, this stand had been filled with the rich and the beautiful: there it was before me, with its broken benches, barely a solid plank on the floor, and wherever there was one, it was covered with old cigar butts, peanut shells, orange peels, etc. However, when I noticed that only seven people made up the crowd in the stand, its dilapidation made more sense, especially when I discovered that getting in easily from the sides was possible for free—with a little effort—a fact quickly demonstrated by the arrival of a few troublemakers and the ever-present vendors of lollipops and peanuts, led by the persistent hymn distributor.

Let us turn now from the dreary stand to the scene below. The race-course is a two-mile distance, perfectly level, on a smooth and stoneless road, and forming a complete circle—light trotting waggons are driving about in the centre, taking it easy at sixteen miles an hour; outside are groups of "rowdies." making their hooks and looking out for greenhorns—an article not so readily found at Long Island as at Epsom.

Let’s shift our focus from the dull stand to the scene below. The racecourse is a two-mile stretch, completely flat, on a smooth, stone-free road, forming a perfect circle. Light trotting wagons are cruising around in the center, moving at a relaxed pace of sixteen miles an hour. On the outside, groups of rowdy spectators are hanging around, making their bets and keeping an eye out for newcomers—something that's not as easy to come by in Long Island as it is at Epsom.

The race is to be "under the saddle," and the long list of competitors which had been announced has dwindled down to the old and far-famed Lady Suffolk and the young and unfamed Tacony.

The race is set to be "under the saddle," and the lengthy list of competitors that was announced has shrunk down to the well-known Lady Suffolk and the lesser-known Tacony.

A stir among the "rowdies" is seen, followed by the appearance "on the boards" of Lady Suffolk. I gazed in wonder as I saw her—a small pony-looking animal—moving her legs as though they were in splints, and as if six miles an hour was far beyond her powers; soon after, Tacony came forward, the picture of a good bony post-horse, destitute of any beauty, but looking full of good stuff. The riders have no distinctive dress; a pair of Wellington boots are pulled on outside the trousers, sharp spurs are on the heels—rough and ready looking birds these. The winning-post is opposite the stand, the umpire is there with a deal board in his hand, a whack on the side of the stand "summons to horse," and another summons to "start." The start is from the distance-post, so as to let the horses get into the full swing of their pace by the time they reach the winning-post, when, if they are fairly up together, the cry "Off" is given; if it be not given, they try again. When speaking of the time in which the mile is completed, the fact of its commencing at full speed should always be borne in mind: sometimes false starts are made by one party, on purpose to try and irritate the temper of the adversary's horse; and in the same way, if a man feels he has full command of his own horse, he will yell like a wild Indian, as he nears his adversary, to make him "break up"—or go into a gallop; and, as they are all trained to speed more by voice than by spur, he very often succeeds, and of course the adversary loses much ground by pulling up into a trot again.

A buzz among the “rowdies” can be felt, followed by the appearance “on the boards” of Lady Suffolk. I watched in disbelief as I saw her—a small pony-like creature—moving her legs as though they were in splints, and as if six miles an hour was way too fast for her; soon after, Tacony came forward, the epitome of a solid, strong post-horse, lacking in any beauty, but looking full of potential. The riders don’t have any special uniforms; they wear Wellington boots pulled on over their trousers, sharp spurs on their heels—these are rough, ready-looking folks. The winning post is in front of the stand, where the umpire is holding a wooden board; a loud bang on the side of the stand calls for the horses, and another signals to “start.” The start is from the distance post, allowing the horses to get into a full stride by the time they reach the winning post, when, if they’re all together, the shout of “Off” is given; if it’s not given, they try again. When talking about the time it takes to complete the mile, it’s important to remember that it starts at full speed: sometimes false starts happen on purpose to annoy the other horse’s temperament; similarly, if a rider feels he has complete control over his horse, he’ll yell like a wild Indian as he gets close to his rival to make him “break” into a gallop; and since they’re all trained to respond more to voice than to spurs, he often succeeds, causing the opponent to lose a lot of ground by having to slow back down to a trot.

On the present occasion there was no false start; the echo of the second whack was still in the car as they reached the winning-post neck and neck. "Off" was the word, and away they went. It certainly was marvellous to see how dear old Lady Suffolk and her stiff legs flew round the course; one might have fancied she had been fed on lightning, so quick did she move them, but with wonderfully short steps. Tack, on the contrary, looked as if he had been dieted on India-rubber balls: every time he raised a hind leg it seemed to shoot his own length a-head of himself; if he could have made his steps as quick as the old lady, he might have done a mile in a minute nearly. Presently, Tacony breaks up, and, ere he pulls into a trot, a long gap is left. Shouts of "Lady Suffolk, Lady Suffolk wins!" rend the air; a few seconds more, and the giant strides of Tacony lessen the gap at every step: they reach the distance-post neck and neck; "Tacony wins!" is the cry, and true enough it is—by a length. Young blood beats old blood—India-rubber balls "whip" lightning. Time, five minutes.

On this occasion, there was no false start; the echo of the second hit was still in the car as they reached the finish line, neck and neck. "Go!" was the word, and off they went. It was amazing to see how dear old Lady Suffolk and her stiff legs flew around the track; you might have thought she was fueled by lightning, so fast did she move, though with surprisingly short strides. Tack, on the other hand, looked as if he had been living on rubber balls: every time he lifted a back leg, it seemed to propel him a full length ahead; if he could have matched the old lady's speed, he could have done a mile in no time. Soon, Tacony falls behind, and before he settles into a trot, a long gap opens up. Shouts of "Lady Suffolk, Lady Suffolk wins!" fill the air; just a few seconds later, the giant strides of Tacony close the gap with every step: they reach the distance post, neck and neck; "Tacony wins!" is the shout, and it's true—by a length. Young blood beats old blood—rubber balls outrun lightning. Time, five minutes.

The usual excitement and disputing follow, the usual time elapses—whack number one is heard, all ready—whack number two, on they come, snaffle bridles, pulling at their horses' mouths as though they would pull the bit right through to the tips of their tails. "Off" is the cry: away they go again; Tacony breaks up—again a gap, which huge strides speedily close up—again Tacony wins. Time, five minutes five seconds. All is over, rush to the cars, &c. Remarks:—first, the pace is at the rate of twenty-four miles an hour; second, the clear old lady, who was only beaten by a length, is long out of her teens; is it not wonderful, and is she not glorious in her defeat? Fancy Dowager Lady L---- taking a pedestrian fit, and running a race along Rotten Row with some "fast young man;" what would you say, if she clutched his coat-tail as he touched the winning-post? Truly, that dear old Lady Suffolk is a marvellous quadruped. Reader, as you do not care to go back again with the Rowdies and Co., we will suppose ourselves returned to New York, and I can only hope you have not been bored with your day's amusement.

The usual excitement and arguments follow, the usual time passes—whack number one is heard, all set—whack number two, they come, snaffle bridles, yanking at their horses' mouths as if they could pull the bit right through to the tips of their tails. "Go!" is the shout: off they go again; Tacony breaks ahead—another gap, which huge strides quickly close—once more, Tacony wins. Time, five minutes five seconds. All done, rush to the cars, etc. Remarks:—first, the pace is at twenty-four miles an hour; second, the clear old lady, who was only beaten by a length, is well past her teenage years; isn't it amazing, and isn't she glorious in her defeat? Imagine Dowager Lady L---- wanting to join in, racing along Rotten Row with some "fast young man;" what would you think if she grabbed his coat as he reached the finish line? Truly, that dear old Lady Suffolk is an incredible creature. Reader, since you probably don't want to go back with the Rowdies and Co., let's suppose we're back in New York, and I can only hope you weren't bored with your day's entertainment.

Among the extraordinary fancies of this extraordinary race—who are ever panting for something new, even if it be a new territory—the most strange is the metallic coffin: the grave is no protection against their mania for novelty. In the windows of a shop in Broadway, this strange, and to my mind revolting, article may be seen, shaped like a mummy, fitting hermetically tight, and with a plate of glass to reveal the features of the inanimate inmate. I have certainly read of the disconsolate lover who, on the death of her who ungratefully refused to reciprocate his affection, disinterred her body by stealth, supplied himself with scanty provision, and embarking in a small boat, launched forth upon the wide waters, to watch her gradual decomposition till starvation found them one common grave. I also knew an officer, who, having stuffed an old and faithful dog, and placed him on the mantel-piece, when his only child died soon after, earnestly entreated a surgeon to stuff the child, that he might place it beside the faithful dog. Nevertheless, I cannot believe that such aberrations of human intellect are sufficiently frequent to make the Patent Metallic Coffin Company a popular or profitable affair.

Among the unusual obsessions of this extraordinary group—who are always seeking something new, even if it's just new land—the strangest is the metallic coffin: the grave offers no escape from their craving for novelty. In a shop window on Broadway, you can see this bizarre and, in my opinion, disturbing item, shaped like a mummy, sealed tightly, with a glass plate to show the face of the lifeless occupant. I've definitely read about the heartbroken lover who, after the woman who coldly rejected his love died, secretly dug her up, brought some limited supplies, and set out on a small boat to watch her body decay until starvation claimed them both. I also knew a soldier who, after stuffing his loyal old dog and putting it on the mantelpiece, begged a surgeon to stuff his child who had died shortly after, so he could place the child next to the faithful dog. Still, I can't believe that such strange behaviors are common enough to make the Patent Metallic Coffin Company a popular or profitable venture.

An important feature in a populous town is the means of conveyance, which here, in addition to hack cabs and omnibuses, includes railway carriages. I would observe, once for all, that the horses of America, as a whole, may be classed as enduring, wiry, and active hacks. You do not see anything to compare with some of the beautiful nags that "Rotten Row" or Melton exhibits; but, on the other hand, you rarely see the lumbering, lolloping, heavy brutes so common in this country. Then, again, a horse in this country is groomed and turned out in a style which I never saw in America, and therefore shows to much greater advantage, in spite of the Yankee sometimes ornamenting his head with hairs from his tail; while on the other hand, though an Englishman considers a pair of nags that will go a mile in five minutes a great prize, no man in America who is a horse fancier would look at a pair that could not do the same distance in four; nor would he think them worth speaking about, if they could not do the distance in a very few seconds over three minutes. On one side of the water, pace is almost the only object; on the other side, shape and appearance are weighty matters.

An important aspect of a busy town is its transportation options, which here, along with taxis and buses, also include trains. I want to point out that the horses in America, overall, can be described as tough, wiry, and active workhorses. You won’t find anything comparable to some of the lovely horses showcased in “Rotten Row” or Melton; however, on the flip side, you rarely see the slow, clumsy, heavy horses that are so common in this country. Additionally, a horse in this country is groomed and presented in a way I’ve never seen in America, making them look much better, despite the fact that sometimes people in America decorate their horses' heads with hair from their tails. On the other hand, while an Englishman sees a pair of horses that can cover a mile in five minutes as a great achievement, no American horse enthusiast would even consider a pair that couldn't do it in four minutes; they'd hardly be worth mentioning if they couldn't do the distance in just a few seconds over three minutes. Across the ocean, speed is almost the only priority; here, style and appearance carry significant weight.

The habits of the Americans being essentially gregarious, and business teaching the truism that a cent saved is a cent gained, hackney coaches are comparatively little used by the men; for it must be remembered that idlers in this country are an invisible minority of the community! The natural consequence is, that they are clean and expensive. The drivers are charmingly independent and undeniably free-and-easy birds, but not meaning to be uncivil. One of them showed his independence by asking two dollars one night for a three-mile drive home to the hotel. I inquired of the master, and found the proper charge was a dollar and a half; but, on my sending out the same, Jarvey was too proud to confess he was wrong, and, refusing the money, drove off—nor did I ever hear more of him.

The habits of Americans are mostly social, and business reminds us that a saved cent is a gained cent, so people don’t use hackney carriages very much. It should be noted that idle individuals in this country are a rare minority! As a result, those carriages are clean and pricey. The drivers are delightfully independent and undeniably laid-back, but they don’t mean to be rude. One night, one of them showed his independence by asking for two dollars for a three-mile ride back to the hotel. I checked with the owner and found out the actual fare was a dollar and a half; however, when I offered that amount, the driver was too proud to admit he was mistaken and, refusing the money, drove away—never to be heard from again.

Their free-and-easiness can never be better exemplified than in the old anecdote told of so many people, from an ex-prince of France, downward; viz., the prince having ordered a hack cab, was standing at the door of the hotel, smoking his cigar, and waiting for its arrival. When Cabby drove up, judging from the appearance of the prince that he was "the fare," he said, "Are you the chap that sent for a cab?" And, being answered with an affirmative smile, he said, "Well, get in; I guess I'm the gentleman that's to drive you."

Their casualness can be best illustrated by an old story involving many people, including a former prince of France. The prince had ordered a hack cab and was waiting at the hotel door, smoking a cigar. When the cab driver arrived, he assumed the prince was his passenger and asked, "Are you the guy who called for a cab?" After receiving a nod, he said, "Alright, hop in; I guess I'm the one driving you."

The next means of conveyance to be spoken of is the omnibus. I was told by a friend who had made inquiries on the subject, that there were upwards of a thousand, and that they pay twenty-two per cent. They are infinitely better than ours, simply because they are broader: the most rotund embodiment of an alderman after a turtle-soup dinner, even if he had—to use the emphatic language of Mr. Weller—been "swellin' wisibly," could pass up the centre without inconvenience to the passengers on either side; and as a good dividend is a thing not to be despised, they do not employ a "cad" behind. The door shuts by a strap running along the roof, with a noose in the end, which Jehu puts on his foot. Any one wishing to alight pulls the strap; Jehu stops; and, poking his nose to a pigeon-hole place in the roof, takes the silver fare; and, slipping the noose, the door is open to the human "fare." Doubtless, this effects a very great saving, and, dispensing with a cad in this country might enable the fares to be lowered; but I question if there be not very many objections to our adopting the plan; and I should miss very much that personification of pertness and civility, with his inquisitive eye, and the eccentric and perpetual gyrations of his fore finger, which ever and anon stiffens in a skyward point, as though under the magic influence of some unseen electro-biologist whose decree had gone forth—"You can't move your finger, sir, you can't; no, you can't." I have only one grudge against the omnibuses in New York—and that is, their monopoly of Broadway, which would really have a very fine and imposing appearance were it not for them: they destroy all the effect, and you gradually begin to think it is the Strand grown wider, despite of the magnificent palaces, hotels, &c., which adorn it on each side.

The next mode of transportation to discuss is the bus. A friend who looked into it told me there are over a thousand of them, and they offer a twenty-two percent return. They’re way better than ours, mainly because they're wider: even the most portly politician after a turtle soup dinner, even if he had—using the colorful words of Mr. Weller—been "swellin' visibly," could walk up the center without bothering the passengers on either side; plus, a good return isn't something to overlook, so they don’t have a rude staff member in the back. The door closes with a strap running along the roof, ending in a noose that the driver steps on. Anyone wanting to get off pulls the strap; the driver stops, leans into a little space in the roof to collect the fare, and after loosening the noose, the door opens for the passenger. This surely saves a lot, and getting rid of a rude staff member here could help lower the fares, but I’m not sure if there aren't plenty of reasons against us adopting this system; I would really miss that embodiment of cheekiness and politeness, with his curious gaze and the quirky, constant movements of his forefinger, which often stiffens pointing skyward, as if under the command of some unseen force that's saying—"You can’t move your finger, sir, you can't; no, you can't." The only issue I have with the buses in New York is their monopoly on Broadway, which would truly look magnificent without them: they ruin the whole effect, and you slowly start to think it’s just the Strand getting wider, despite the impressive palaces, hotels, etc., lining each side.

A RAILWAY CARRIAGE.

A RAILWAY CARRIAGE.

A RAILWAY CARRIAGE.

A train car.

The last means of conveyance to be mentioned is the railway carriage, which—the city being built on a perfect flat—is admirably adapted for locomotion. The rails are laid down in a broad avenue on each side of Broadway, and the cars are drawn by horses, some two, some four. Those that are used for the simple town business have only two horses, and will hold about twenty-four passengers; the others run from the lower end of the town to a place where the engine is waiting for them outside. The town railway-car may be called a long omnibus, low on the wheels, broad, airy, and clean inside, and, excessively convenient for getting in and out. There is a break at both ends, one under the charge of Jehu, the other under the charge of the guard; so that, though trotting along at a good pace, they are very easily stopped. When they get to the end of the journey, the horses change ends, thus avoiding the necessity of any turning, the space required for which would have made a great difference in the expense. For a busy, bustling city, on a flat, it is unquestionably by far the best conveyance, on account of carrying so many, and being so handy for ingress and egress.

The last mode of transportation to mention is the train car, which—since the city is built on completely flat land—is perfectly suited for travel. The tracks are laid down in a wide avenue on each side of Broadway, and the cars are pulled by horses, either two or four. The ones used for local trips have just two horses and can carry about twenty-four passengers; the others run from the southern end of the town to a spot where the engine waits for them outside. The town train car can be described as a long bus, low to the ground, spacious, airy, and clean inside, making it super convenient for getting on and off. There is a brake at both ends, one handled by the driver, the other by the conductor; so, even while moving at a decent speed, they can be easily stopped. When they reach the end of the route, the horses switch ends, which eliminates the need for turning around, saving significant costs. For a busy, bustling city on flat land, it is definitely the best option for transportation because it carries so many people and is very easy to get in and out of.

There was a strong push made to get one laid down in Broadway, and corporation jobbery had nearly succeeded. For my own part, did I live in Broadway, if they would lay down a single line of rail, with shunters at intervals, to enable the cars to pass one another, and fix regular hours for running, I should infinitely prefer it to the unlimited army of omnibuses that now block up the street; but I fancy the interests of the latter are too deeply involved to be readily resigned.

There was a strong effort to lay down a rail line on Broadway, and corporate interests were close to making it happen. Personally, if I lived on Broadway, I would much prefer a single railway line with occasional shunting so that vehicles could pass each other and set schedules for running, rather than the endless stream of buses that currently crowd the street; however, I think the bus companies have too much at stake to easily give that up.

Before leaving the subject of railway carriages, I may as well give you a description of the travelling cars in ordinary use.

Before moving on from the topic of train carriages, I might as well describe the passenger cars that are commonly used.

They are forty-two feet long, nine and a half wide, from six to six and a half feet high, and carry from fifty to sixty passengers. Each seat is three feet four inches long, placed at right angles to the window, and has a reversible back. There is a passage through the centre of the car, between the rows of seats. In winter, a stove is always burning in each carriage; and in one of them there is generally a small room partitioned off, containing a water-closet, &c. A door is placed at each extremity, outside which there is a platform whereon the break is fixed. These carriages are supported at each end by four wheels, of thirty-three inches diameter, fitted together in a frame-work, and moving on a pivot, whereby to enable them to take more easily any sharp bend in the road. Their weight is from ten to twelve tons, and their cost from 400l. to 450l. sterling. The system of coupling adopted is alike rude and uncomfortable; instead of screwing the carriages tightly up against the buffers, as is the practice in England, they are simply hooked together, thus subjecting the passengers to a succession of jerks when starting, and consequently producing an equal number of concussions when the train stops.

They are forty-two feet long, nine and a half feet wide, six to six and a half feet high, and can carry fifty to sixty passengers. Each seat is three feet four inches long, positioned at right angles to the window, and has a back that can be flipped. There’s a passage running through the center of the car, between the rows of seats. In winter, there’s always a stove running in each carriage, and in one of them, there’s usually a small room separated off that contains a bathroom, etc. There’s a door at each end, outside of which there’s a platform where the brake is mounted. These carriages are supported at each end by four wheels, thirty-three inches in diameter, connected in a frame that allows them to pivot, making it easier for them to navigate sharp bends in the track. They weigh between ten and twelve tons, and cost between 400l and 450l sterling. The coupling system used is both crude and uncomfortable; instead of securely fastening the carriages against the buffers as is common in England, they are simply hooked together, which subjects passengers to a series of jolts when starting and consequently causes equal jolts when the train stops.

From the foregoing sketch, it will be seen that the narrowness of the seats is such as to prevent its two occupants—if of ordinary dimensions—from sitting together without rubbing shoulders. It will also be observed, that the passage through the centre of the carriages enables any one to pass with ease throughout the whole length of the train. This is a privilege of which the mercurial blood and inquisitive mind of the American take unlimited advantage, rendering the journey one continued slamming of doors, which, if the homoeopathic principle be correct, would prove an infallible cure for headache, could the sound only be triturated, and passed through the finest sieve, so as to reach the tympanum in infinitesimal doses. But, alas! it is administered wholesale, and with such power, that almost before the ear catches the sound, it is vibrating in the tendon Achilles. It is said by some, that salmon get accustomed to crimping; and I suppose that, in like manner, the American tympanum gets accustomed to this abominable clatter and noise.

From the overview above, it’s clear that the seats are narrow enough to prevent two people of average size from sitting together without bumping shoulders. It can also be noted that the aisle running through the center of the carriages allows anyone to move easily along the entire length of the train. This is a privilege that the lively spirit and curious nature of Americans take full advantage of, making the journey a continuous series of slamming doors, which, if the homeopathic principle is correct, would be a guaranteed cure for headaches—if only the noise could be filtered and delivered in tiny doses. But unfortunately, it’s delivered all at once and so loudly that almost before the ear registers the sound, it’s already resonating in the Achilles tendon. Some say that salmon get used to being crimped; I suppose similarly, Americans' eardrums get used to this horrible clatter and noise.

The luggage-van is generally placed between the carriages and the engine. And here it is essential I should make some observations with reference to the ticket system which is universally adopted in America. Every passenger is furnished with brass tickets, numbered, and a duplicate is attached to each article of luggage. No luggage is delivered without the passenger producing the ticket corresponding to that on the article claimed, the Company being responsible for any loss. This system is peculiarly suited to the habits of the American people, inasmuch as nine-tenths of them, if not more, upon arriving at the end of their journey, invariably go to some hotel; and as each establishment, besides providing an omnibus for the convenience of its customers, has an agent ready to look after luggage, the traveller has merely to give his ticket to that functionary, thus saving himself all further trouble.

The luggage van is usually situated between the train carriages and the engine. It's important for me to mention the ticket system that's widely used in America. Every passenger gets numbered brass tickets, and a duplicate is attached to each piece of luggage. Luggage won’t be handed over without the passenger presenting the matching ticket for the item being claimed, with the company being liable for any loss. This system fits the habits of Americans quite well, as most of them, if not more, typically head to a hotel at the end of their journey. Each hotel not only provides a shuttle for its guests but also has an agent to handle luggage, so the traveler just has to hand over their ticket to that person, making things much easier for themselves.

THE LOCOMOTIVE.

THE LOCOMOTIVE.

THE LOCOMOTIVE.

THE TRAIN.

The last, but not the least important, object connected with railways, remains yet to be mentioned—viz., the locomotive. Its driving-wheels are generally six feet and a half in diameter, the cylinder is sixteen inches in diameter, and has a stroke of twenty-two inches. But the point to which I wish to call especial attention, is the very sensible provision made for the comfort of the engineer and stokers, who are thoroughly protected by a weather-proof compartment, the sides whereof, being made of glass, enable them to exercise more effective vigilance than they possibly could do if they were exposed in the heartless manner prevalent in this country.

The last, but definitely not the least important, item related to railways that I need to mention is the locomotive. Its driving wheels are usually six and a half feet in diameter, the cylinder is sixteen inches in diameter, and has a stroke of twenty-two inches. However, the main point I want to emphasize is the thoughtful design for the comfort of the engineer and stokers, who are well protected by a weatherproof compartment. The sides of this compartment are made of glass, allowing them to maintain better vigilance than they would if they were exposed in the harsh way commonly seen in this country.

From my subsequent experience in the railway travelling of the United States, I am induced to offer the following suggestions for the consideration of our legislature. First, for the protection of the old, the helpless, or the desirous, an act should be passed, compelling every railway company to supply tickets for luggage to each passenger applying for them, provided that the said application be made within a given period previous to the departure of the train; this ticket to insure the delivery of the luggage at the proper station, and to the proper owner.

From my later experiences traveling on railways in the United States, I feel motivated to share some suggestions for our legislature to consider. First, to protect the elderly, the vulnerable, and those who wish to ensure their belongings are safe, a law should be enacted requiring every railway company to provide luggage tickets to any passenger who requests them, as long as the request is made within a certain timeframe before the train leaves. This ticket should guarantee the luggage is delivered to the correct station and the rightful owner.

Secondly, an act compelling railway companies to afford efficient protection from the weather to the engineer and stokers of every train, holding the chairman and board of directors responsible in the heaviest penalties for every accident that may occur where this simple and humane provision is neglected.

Secondly, a law requiring railway companies to provide adequate protection from the weather for the engineers and stokers of each train, making the chairman and board of directors liable for severe penalties for any accidents that happen when this straightforward and humane measure is ignored.

Thirdly, an act requiring some system of communication between guard, passengers, and engineer. The following rude method strikes me as so obvious, that I wonder it has not been tried, until some better substitute be found. Let the guard's seat project in all trains—as it now does in some—beyond the carriages, thus enabling him to see the whole length of one side of the train; carry the foot-board and the hand-rail half way across the space between the carriages, by which simple means the guard could walk outside from one end of the train to the other, thus supervising everything, and gathering in the tickets en route, instead of inconveniencing the public, as at present, by detaining the train many minutes for that purpose.[D]

Thirdly, there should be a system for communication between the guard, passengers, and engineer. The following simple idea seems so obvious that I’m surprised it hasn’t been tried until a better option comes along. The guard's seat should extend on all trains—as it currently does on some—beyond the carriages, allowing him to see the entire length of one side of the train; the footboard and handrail should stretch halfway across the space between the carriages. With this straightforward setup, the guard could walk outside from one end of the train to the other, supervising everything and collecting tickets along the way, instead of holding up the train for several minutes as is currently the case.[D]

Next, fit every carriage with two strong metal pipes, running just over the doors, and projecting a foot or so beyond the length of the carriage, the end of the pipe to have a raised collar, by which means an elastic gutta percha tube could connect the pipes while the carriages were being attached; a branch tube of gutta percha should then be led from the pipe on one side into each compartment, so that any passenger, by blowing through it, would sound a whistle in the place appropriated to the guard. On the opposite side, the pipes would be solely for communication between the guard and engine-driver. Should the length of any train be found too great for such communication, surely it were better to sacrifice an extra guard's salary, than trifle with human life in the way we have hitherto done. Each engine should have a second whistle, with a trumpet tone, similar to that employed in America, to be used in case of danger, the ordinary one being employed, as at present, only to give warning of approach.

Next, equip each carriage with two strong metal pipes running just above the doors and extending about a foot beyond the length of the carriage. The ends of the pipes should have raised collars, allowing for an elastic gutta percha tube to connect them while the carriages are being linked. A branch tube of gutta percha should then run from the pipe on one side into each compartment, so any passenger can blow into it to sound a whistle where the guard is stationed. On the opposite side, the pipes will only be for communication between the guard and the engine driver. If the length of any train is found to be too long for this communication, it would be better to sacrifice an extra guard's salary than to risk human lives as we have done in the past. Each engine should have a second whistle with a trumpet tone, similar to the one used in America, to be used in case of danger, while the regular one continues to serve as a warning of approach.

With these sagacious hints for the consideration of my countrymen, I postpone for the present the subject of railways, and, in excuse for the length of my remarks, have only to plead a desire to make railway travelling in England more safe, and my future wanderings more intelligible. I have much more to say with regard to New York and its neighbourhood; but not wishing to overdose the reader at once, I shall return to the subject in the pages, as I did to the place in my subsequent travels.

With these wise suggestions for my fellow countrymen, I’m putting off the topic of railways for now, and the only reason for my lengthy comments is my desire to make train travel in England safer and my future journeys easier to understand. I have a lot more to say about New York and its surroundings, but not wanting to overwhelm the reader all at once, I’ll come back to the topic in the following pages, just as I did with the location in my later travels.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

This power of supervision, on the part of the guard, might also act as an effective check upon the operations of those swindling gamblers who infest many of our railroads—especially the express trains of the Edinburgh and Glasgow—in which, owing to no stoppage taking place, they exercise their villanous calling with comparative impunity.



CHAPTER IV.

A Day on the North River.




Early one fine morning in October, a four-seated fly might have been seen at the door of Putnam's hotel, on the roof of which was being piled a Babel of luggage, the inside being already full. Into another vehicle, our party—i.e., three of us—entered, and ere long both the carriages were on the banks of the river, where the steamer was puffing away, impatient for a start. The hawsers were soon cast off, and we launched forth on the bosom of the glorious Hudson, whose unruffled surface blazed like liquid fire beneath the rays of the rising sun. I purposely abstain from saying anything of the vessel, as she was an old one, and a very bad specimen. The newer and better class of vessel, I shall have to describe hereafter.

Early one beautiful October morning, a four-seat carriage was parked at the entrance of Putnam's hotel, where a chaotic pile of luggage was being loaded onto the roof while the inside was already packed. Our group—i.e., three of us—got into another vehicle, and soon both carriages arrived at the riverbank, where the steamer was eagerly puffing away, ready to depart. The ropes were quickly untied, and we set off on the stunning Hudson, whose calm surface glistened like liquid fire under the warm rays of the rising sun. I’m deliberately not mentioning much about the boat since it was old and not in great shape. I'll describe a newer and better type of vessel later.

On leaving New York, the northern banks of the river are dotted in every direction with neat little villas, the great want being turf, to which the American climate is an inveterate foe. Abreast of one of these villas, all around me is now smiling with peace and gladness; alas! how different was the scene but a few months previous; then, struggling bodies strewed the noble stream, and the hills and groves resounded with the bitterest cries of human agony, as one of the leviathan steamers, wrapped in a fierce and fiery mantle, hurried her living cargo to a burning or a watery grave.

On leaving New York, the northern banks of the river are filled with charming little villas, with the only downside being the lack of grass, which the American climate just can’t seem to support. Next to one of these villas, everything around me is now peaceful and happy; sadly, how different the scene was just a few months ago; back then, struggling bodies filled the majestic stream, and the hills and woods echoed with the most painful cries of human suffering, as one of the huge steamers, engulfed in a fierce and fiery blaze, rushed its living cargo to a fiery or watery grave.

We had a motley collection of passengers, but were not overcrowded. Of course, there was a Paddy on board. Where can one go without meeting one of that migratory portion of our race! There he was, with his "shocking bad hat," his freckled face, his bright eye, and his shrewd expression, smoking his old "dudeen," and gazing at the new world around him. But who shall say his thoughts were not in some wretched hovel in the land of his birth, and his heart beating with the noble determination, that when his industry met its reward, those who had shared his sorrows in the crowded land of his fathers, should partake of his success in the thinly-tenanted home of his adoption. Good luck to you, Paddy, with all my heart!

We had a diverse group of passengers, but we weren't cramped. Naturally, there was an Irishman on board. Where can you go without running into one of that wandering part of our race? There he was, with his "terribly bad hat," his freckled face, his bright eyes, and his clever expression, smoking his old pipe and taking in the new world around him. But who can say his thoughts weren’t in some miserable little home back in his homeland, with his heart filled with the determination that when his hard work paid off, those who had shared his struggles in the crowded land of his birth would also enjoy his success in the sparsely populated place he now called home. Good luck to you, Irishman, from the bottom of my heart!

I was rather amused by a story I heard, of a newly-arrived Paddy emigrant, who, having got a little money, of course wanted a little whisky. On going to the bar to ask the price, he was told three-halfpence. "For how much?" quoth Paddy. The bottle was handed to him, and he was told to take as much as he liked. Paddy's joy knew no bounds at this liberality, and, unable to contain his ecstasy, he rushed to the door to communicate the good news to his companions, which he did in the following racy sentence: "Mike! Mike, my sowl! com' an' haf a dhrink—only thruppence for both of us, an' the botthel in yer own fisht!"

I was pretty amused by a story I heard about a newly-arrived Irish immigrant who, having a little money, obviously wanted a drink. When he went to the bar to ask the price, he was told it was three-halfpence. "How much?" asked the Irishman. They handed him the bottle and told him to take as much as he wanted. His excitement was off the charts at this generosity, and unable to hold back his joy, he rushed to the door to share the good news with his friends, saying, "Mike! Mike, my friend! Come and have a drink—only three pence for both of us, and the bottle is yours!"

One unfortunate fellow on board had lost a letter of recommendation, and was in great distress in consequence. I hope he succeeded in replacing it better than a servant-girl is said to have done, under similar circumstances, who—as the old story goes—having applied to the captain of the vessel, received the following doubtful recommendation at the hand of that functionary: "This is to certify that Kate Flannagan had a good character when she embarked at New York, but she lost it on board the steamer coming up. Jeremiah Peascod, Captain."

One unfortunate guy on board had lost a letter of recommendation and was really upset about it. I hope he managed to replace it better than a servant girl allegedly did in a similar situation, who—as the old story goes—asked the captain of the ship for a recommendation and got this rather uncertain one from him: "This is to certify that Kate Flannagan had a good character when she boarded in New York, but she lost it while on the steamer coming up. Jeremiah Peascod, Captain."

The scenery of the Hudson has been so well described, and so justly eulogized, that I need say little on that score. In short, no words can convey an adequate impression of the gorgeousness of the forest tints in North America during the autumn. The foliage is inconceivably beautiful and varied, from the broad and brightly dark purple leaf of the maple, to the delicate and pale sere leaf of the poplar, all blending harmoniously with the deep green of their brethren in whom the vital sap still flows in full vigour. I have heard people compare the Hudson and the Rhine. I cannot conceive two streams more totally dissimilar—the distinctive features of one being wild forest scenery, glowing with ever-changing hues, and suggestive of a new world; and those of the other, the wild and craggy cliff capped with beetling fortresses, and banks fringed with picturesque villages and towns, all telling of feudal times and an old world. I should as soon think of comparing the castle of Heidelberg, on its lofty hill with Buckingham Palace, in its metropolitan hole.—But to return to the Hudson.

The scenery of the Hudson has been described so well and praised so justly that I don't need to say much about it. In short, no words can adequately capture the stunning array of colors in North America's forests during autumn. The foliage is incredibly beautiful and varied, from the broad, dark purple leaves of the maple to the delicate, pale leaves of the poplar, all blending harmoniously with the deep green of their counterparts, where the vital sap still flows vigorously. I've heard people compare the Hudson and the Rhine. I can’t imagine two rivers being more different—one featuring wild forest landscapes, bursting with ever-changing colors and evoking a new world, and the other showcasing rugged cliffs topped with imposing fortresses, with banks lined by charming villages and towns that reflect a feudal past and an old world. I might as well compare the castle of Heidelberg on its high hill with Buckingham Palace in its urban setting.—But back to the Hudson.

In various places you will see tramways from the top of the banks down to the water; these are for the purpose of shooting down the ice, from the lakes and ponds above, to supply the New York market. The ice-houses are made on a slope, and fronting as much north as possible. They are built of wood, and doubled, the space between which—about a foot and a half—is filled with bark, tanned. In a bend of the river, I saw the indications of something like the forming of a dock, or basin; and, on inquiry, was told it was the work of a Company who imagined they had discovered where the famous pirate Kidd had buried his treasure. The Company found to their cost, that it was they who were burying their treasure, instead of Captain Kidd who had buried his; so, having realized their mare's-nest, they gave it up. One of the most beautiful "bits" on the Hudson is West Point; but, as I purpose visiting it at my leisure hereafter, I pass it by at present without further comment.

In various locations, you'll notice tramways that run from the tops of the banks down to the water. These are used to transport ice from the lakes and ponds above to supply the New York market. The ice houses are constructed on a slope and face as much north as possible. They're built from wood and have a double layer, with the space in between—about a foot and a half—filled with tanned bark. In a bend of the river, I spotted signs of what looked like a dock or basin being formed. After asking around, I found out it was the work of a company that thought they had found the spot where the famous pirate Kidd buried his treasure. Unfortunately for the company, they ended up burying their own treasure instead of finding Captain Kidd's; realizing their mistake, they decided to give it up. One of the most stunning spots on the Hudson is West Point, but since I plan to visit it at my leisure later, I’ll skip over it for now without further comments.

There are every now and then, especially on the southern bank, large plots, which, at a distance, look exactly like Turkish cemeteries. On nearing them, you find that the old destroyer, Time, has expended all the soil sufficiently to allow the bare rock to peep through, and the disconsolate forest has retired in consequence, leaving only the funeral cypress to give silent expression to its affliction. Hark! what sound is that? Dinner! A look at the company was not as appétissant as a glass of bitters, but a peep at the tout-ensemble was fatal; so, patience to the journey's end. Accordingly, I consoled myself with a cigar and the surrounding scenery; no hard task either, with two good friends to help you. On we went, passing little villages busy as bees, and some looking as fresh as if they had been built over-night. At last, a little before dusk, Albany hove in sight. As we neared the wharf, it became alive with Paddy cabmen and porters of every age: the former, brandishing their whips, made such a rush on board when we got within jumping distance, that one would have thought they had come to storm the vessel. We took it coolly, allowing the rush of passengers to land first; and then, having engaged two "broths of boys" with hackney coaches, we drove up to the Congress Hall Hotel, where, thanks to our young American cicerone, we were very soon comfortably lodged, with a jolly good dinner before us. I may as well explain why it was thanks to our friend that we were comfortably lodged.

There are occasionally, especially on the southern bank, large areas that, from a distance, look just like Turkish cemeteries. As you get closer, you realize that the old destroyer, Time, has eroded the soil enough for the bare rock to show through, and the sorrowful forest has retreated as a result, leaving only the mourning cypress to silently express its grief. Wait! What’s that sound? Dinner! A look at the company wasn’t as appealing as a glass of bitters, but a glance at the overall scene was a deal-breaker; so, I just had to be patient until the journey's end. Therefore, I occupied myself with a cigar and the surrounding scenery; not a difficult task either, with two good friends to enjoy it with. We continued on, passing little villages buzzing like bees, some looking as fresh as if they were built overnight. Finally, just before dusk, Albany came into view. As we neared the wharf, it came alive with cab drivers and porters of all ages: the cab drivers, waving their whips, rushed on board as soon as we got within jumping distance, making it seem like they were about to storm the vessel. We stayed calm, letting the rush of passengers get off first; then, after hiring two "broths of boys" with hackney coaches, we drove to the Congress Hall Hotel, where, thanks to our young American guide, we were quickly settled in comfortably, with a great dinner waiting for us. I might as well explain why it was thanks to our friend that we were so well accommodated.

'Throughout the whole length and breadth of the Republic, the people are gregarious, and go everywhere in flocks; consequently, on the arrival of railway train or steamer, 'buses from the various hotels are always in waiting, and speedily filled. No sooner does the 'bus pull up, than a rush is made by each one to the book lying on the counter, that he may inscribe his name as soon as possible, and secure a bedroom. The duty of allotting the apartments generally devolves upon the head clerk, or chief assistant; but as, from the locomotive propensities of the population, he has a very extensive acquaintance, and knows not how soon some of them may be arriving, he billets the unknown in the most out-of-the-way rooms; for the run upon all the decent hotels is so great, that courtesy is scarce needed to insure custom. Not that they are uncivil; but the confusion caused by an arrival is so great, and the mass of travellers are so indifferent to the comfort or the attention which one meets with in a decent hotel in this country, that, acting from habit, they begin by roosting their guests, like crows, at the top of the tree.

'Across the entire Republic, people are social and travel in groups; as a result, when a train or steamer arrives, buses from various hotels are always waiting and fill up quickly. No sooner does the bus arrive than everyone rushes to the book on the counter to write down their names as quickly as possible to secure a room. The responsibility of assigning the rooms usually falls on the head clerk or chief assistant. However, due to the constant influx of people, he has a vast network and never knows when new arrivals will come, so he places the unknown guests in the least desirable rooms. The demand for all the decent hotels is so high that good manners aren’t really necessary to ensure business. They’re not rude; however, the chaos caused by an arrival is immense, and the crowd of travelers is often indifferent to the comfort or attention one might expect in a decent hotel in this country, so out of habit, they tend to put their guests in the least desirable spots.'

To obviate this inconvenience, I would suggest, for the benefit of future travellers, the plan I found on many occasions so successful myself, in my subsequent journeys; which is, whenever you are comfortably lodged in any hotel, to take a letter from the proprietor to the next you wish to stop at. They give it you most readily, and on many occasions I found the advantage of it. They all know one another; and in this way you might travel all through the Union.

To avoid this hassle, I recommend a strategy that has worked well for me during my travels, which could benefit future travelers. Whenever you’re settled in a hotel, ask the owner for a letter of introduction to the next hotel you plan to stay at. They’re usually happy to provide it, and I've found it to be very helpful. Hotels tend to know each other, so this way you could travel all across the country.

Dinner is over—the events of the day have been discussed 'mid fragrant clouds, and we are asleep in the capital of the State of New York.

Dinner is over—the day's events have been talked about among fragrant clouds, and we are asleep in New York City.

We were obliged to be astir early in the morning, so as to be in time for the railway; consequently, our lionizing of the city consisted chiefly in smoking a cigar at the front-door. The town is prettily situated on the banks of the Hudson, and at its confluence with the Erie canal. It is one of the few towns in the Republic which enjoys a Royalist name, having been called after the Duke of York and Albany, and is a very thriving place, with a steadily increasing population, already amounting to sixty thousand; and some idea of its prosperity may be formed from the fact of its receiving, by the Erie canal, annually, goods to the value of near six millions sterling. Some years ago it was scourged by an awful fire; but it has risen, like a phoenix, from its ashes, and profited materially by the chastisement. The chief objection I had to the town was the paving of the streets, which was abominable, and full of holes, any of them large enough to bury a hippopotamus, and threatening dislocation of some joint at every step; thus clearly proving that the contract for the paving was in the hands of the surgeons. On similar grounds, it has often occurred to me that the proprietors of the London cabs must be chiefly hatters.

We had to get up early in the morning to catch the train, so our sightseeing in the city mainly consisted of smoking a cigar at the front door. The town is beautifully located on the banks of the Hudson River, where it meets the Erie Canal. It's one of the few towns in the country that has a Royalist name, named after the Duke of York and Albany. It's a thriving place with a growing population of around sixty thousand, and you can get an idea of its prosperity from the fact that it receives goods worth nearly six million pounds through the Erie Canal every year. A few years ago, it was hit by a terrible fire, but it has risen from the ashes like a phoenix and has benefited from the experience. My main complaint about the town was the condition of the streets, which were terrible and full of potholes, some big enough to swallow a hippopotamus, and every step felt like it might dislocate something. This clearly showed that the contract for the paving was awarded to surgeons. On a similar note, I've often thought that the owners of the London cabs must primarily be hat makers.

Our descent from the hotel to the railway station was as lively as that of a parched pea on a red-hot frying-pan, but it was effected without any injury requiring the assistance of the paving-surgeons, and by the time our luggage was ticketed the train had arrived: some tumbled out, others tumbled in; the kettle hissed, and off we went, the first few hundred yards of our journey being along the street. Not being accustomed to see a train going in full cry through the streets, I expected every minute to hear a dying squeak, as some of the little urchins came out, jumping and playing close to the cars; but they seem to be protected by a kind of instinct; and I believe it would be as easy to drive a train over a cock-sparrow as over a Yankee boy. At last we emerged from the town, and went steaming away merrily over the country. Our companions inside were a motley group of all classes. By good fortune, we found a spare seat on which to put our cloaks, &c., which was a luxury rarely enjoyed in my future travels, being generally obliged to carry them on my knee, as the American cars are usually so full that there is seldom a vacant place on which to lay them.

Our descent from the hotel to the train station was as lively as a dry pea on a hot frying pan, but we managed it without any injuries that needed a doctor, and by the time our luggage was tagged, the train had arrived: some people got off while others got on; the kettle was whistling, and off we went, the first few hundred yards of our journey being along the street. Not being used to seeing a train speeding through the streets, I expected to hear a screech at any moment as some of the kids came out, jumping and playing near the tracks; but they seemed to be protected by some instinct. I believe it would be just as easy to run over a sparrow as it would be to hit a kid. Finally, we left the town and happily steamed away over the countryside. Our fellow passengers were a mixed group from all walks of life. Luckily, we found an extra seat for our cloaks, etc., which was a luxury I rarely enjoyed in my future travels, as I usually had to keep them on my lap, since American train cars are typically so crowded that there’s rarely a free spot to put them down.

Our route lay partly along the line of the Mohawk, on the banks of which is situated the lovely village of Rockton, or Little Falls, where the gushing stream is compressed between two beautifully wooded cliffs, affording a water-power which has been turned to good account by the establishment of mills. At this point the Erie canal is cut for two miles through the solid rock, and its unruffled waters, contrasting with the boiling river struggling through the narrow gorge, look like streams of Peace and Passion flowing and struggling side by side. As the "iron horse" hurries us onward, the ears are assailed, amid the wild majesty of Nature, with the puny cockneyisms of "Rome," "Syracuse," &c. Such absurdities are ridiculous enough in our suburban villas; but to find them substituted for the glorious old Indian names, is positively painful.

Our route partially followed the Mohawk River, where the charming village of Rockton, or Little Falls, is located. The rushing stream flows between two beautifully forested cliffs, providing water power that has been effectively used to set up mills. Here, the Erie Canal is cut for two miles through solid rock, and its calm waters, in contrast to the churning river that struggles through the narrow gorge, look like streams of Peace and Passion flowing and battling side by side. As the "iron horse" speeds us along, our ears are bombarded, amid the wild majesty of Nature, with the trivial expressions from places like "Rome," "Syracuse," etc. Such absurdities are silly enough in our suburban homes, but to see them replace the glorious old Native American names is genuinely painful.

Among other passengers in the train, was a man conspicuous among his fellows for clean hide and clean dimity; on inquiry, I was told he was a Professor. He looked rather young for a professorial chair, and further investigation confused me still more, for I found he was a Professor of Soap. At last, I ascertained that he had earned his title by going about the country lecturing upon, and exhibiting in his person, the valuable qualities of his detergent treasures, through which peripatetic advertisement he had succeeded in realizing dollars and honours. The oratory of some of these Professors is, I am told, of an order before which the eloquence of a Demosthenes would shrink abashed, if success is admitted as the test; for, only put them at the corner of a street in any town, and I have no fears of binding myself to eat every cake they do not sell before they quit their oratorical platform. The soapy orator quitted the train at Auburn, and soon after, the vandalism of "Rome" and "Syracuse" was atoned for by the more appropriate and euphonical old Indian names of "Cayuga" and "Canandaigua."

Among the other passengers on the train was a man who stood out for his clean appearance and neat clothes; when I asked about him, I was told he was a professor. He looked rather young for a professor, and further investigation only confused me more, as I discovered he was a Professor of Soap. Eventually, I learned that he earned his title by traveling around the country, giving lectures and showcasing the valuable qualities of his cleaning products, through which he managed to make money and gain recognition. I've heard that the speeches of some of these professors are so impressive that the eloquence of Demosthenes would fade in comparison if success is considered the measure; just place them at a street corner in any town, and I confidently would challenge myself to eat every cake they don't sell before they leave their speaking spot. The soapy speaker got off the train at Auburn, and shortly after, the clumsy names "Rome" and "Syracuse" were replaced by the more fitting and melodious old Indian names "Cayuga" and "Canandaigua."

On reaching the station of the latter, an old and kind friend to my brother, when he first visited America, was waiting to welcome us to his house, which was about a quarter of a mile distant, and a most comfortable establishment it proved, in every way. Our worthy host was a Scotchman by birth, and though he had passed nearly half a century in the United States, he was as thoroughly Scotch in all his ways as if he had just arrived from his native land; and while enjoying his hospitalities, you might have fancied yourself in a Highland laird's old family mansion. In all his kind attentions, he was most ably assisted by his amiable lady. Everything I had seen hitherto was invested with an air of newness, looking as if of yesterday: here, the old furniture and the fashion thereof, even its very arrangement, all told of days long bygone, and seemed to say, "We are heir-looms." When you went upstairs, the old Bible on your bedroom table, with its worn cover, well-thumbed leaves, and its large paper-mark, browned by the hand of Time, again proclaimed, "I am an heir-loom," and challenged your respect; and worthy companions they all were to mine host and his lady, who, while they warmed your heart with their cheerful and unostentatious hospitality, also commanded your respect by the way they dispensed it.

Upon reaching the station of the latter, an old and kind friend of my brother, who had first visited America, was there to welcome us to his house, which was about a quarter of a mile away, and it turned out to be a very comfortable place in every way. Our gracious host was a Scottish man by birth, and even though he had spent nearly fifty years in the United States, he was still just as Scottish in all his manners as if he had just arrived from his homeland; while enjoying his hospitality, you could have easily imagined yourself in an old family mansion of a Highland laird. In all his warm attentions, he was wonderfully supported by his lovely wife. Everything I had seen so far had a fresh feel to it, looking as if it were brand new: here, the old furniture and its style, even the way it was arranged, spoke of long-gone days and seemed to say, "We are heirlooms." When you went upstairs, the old Bible on your bedside table, with its worn cover, well-thumbed pages, and a large bookmark, weathered by time, again declared, "I am an heirloom," and deserved your respect; and they were worthy companions to my host and his wife, who, while warming your heart with their friendly and unpretentious hospitality, also commanded your respect with the way they shared it.

The following day our route lay across country, out of the line of stage or rail; so a vehicle had to be got, which my young American cicerone, under the guidance of mine host, very soon arranged; and in due time, a long, slight, open cart, with the seats slung to the sides, drove to the door, with four neat greys, that might have made "Tommy Onslow's" mouth water.

The next day our journey took us off the main road, away from any stagecoach or train routes; so we needed to find a vehicle, which my young American guide quickly arranged with the help of our host. Soon enough, a long, light, open cart arrived at the door, with seats attached on the sides and pulled by four tidy grey horses that would have made "Tommy Onslow" envious.

While they are putting in the luggage, I may as well give you a sketch of how the young idea is sometimes taught to shoot in this country. Time—early morning. Paterfamilias at the door, smoking a cigar—a lad of ten years of age appears.

While they're loading the luggage, I might as well give you a quick overview of how young kids are sometimes taught to shoot in this country. Time—early morning. The dad is at the door, smoking a cigar—a ten-year-old boy shows up.

"I say, father, can I have Two-forty?[E] I want to go down to the farm, to see my cattle fed!"

"I’m asking you, Dad, can I have two forty? [E] I want to head down to the farm to see my cattle fed!"

Scarce had leave been obtained, before a cry was heard in another quarter. "Hallo, Jemmy! what's the matter now? Wont Shelty go?"

Scarce had leave been obtained, before a cry was heard in another quarter. "Hey, Jemmy! What's the matter now? Won't Shelty go?"

The youth so addressed was about six, and sitting in a little low four-wheeled carriage, whacking away at a Shetland-looking pony, with a coat, every hair of which was long enough for a horse's tail. The difficulty was soon discovered, for it was an old trick of Shelty to lift one leg outside the shaft, and strike for wages, if he wasn't pleased.

The kid being talked to was about six years old, sitting in a small low four-wheeled carriage, hitting a pony that looked like a Shetland, whose coat had hair long enough to be a horse's tail. The problem was quickly identified; it was an old trick of Shelty to lift one leg outside the shaft and stop working if he wasn’t happy.

"Get out, Jemmy, I'll set him right;" and accordingly, Shelty's leg was lifted inside, and Paterfamilias commenced lunging him round and round before the door. After a few circles he said, "Now then, Jemmy, get in again; he's all right now."

"Get out, Jemmy, I’ll take care of him;" and with that, Shelty's leg was lifted inside, and Paterfamilias started leading him in circles before the door. After a few laps, he said, "Okay, Jemmy, get back in; he’s fine now."

The infant Jehu mounts, and of course commences pitching into Shelty, alike vigorously and harmlessly; off they go at score."

The baby Jehu climbs on and starts to playfully throw things at Shelty, both energetically and without any harm; off they go scoring points.

"Where are you going, Jemmy?"

"Where are you headed, Jemmy?"

"What—say—father?" No words are lost.

"What—say—dad?" No words are lost.

"Where are you going, Jemmy?"

"Where are you headed, Jemmy?"

"Going to get some turnips for my pigs;" and Jemmy disappeared in a bend of the road.

"Going to grab some turnips for my pigs;" and Jemmy vanished around a curve in the road.

On inquiry, I found Jemmy used often to go miles from home in this way, and was as well known in the neighbourhood as his father.

On asking around, I discovered that Jemmy often went miles away from home like this, and he was just as well-known in the neighborhood as his dad.

On another occasion, I remember seeing three lads, the oldest about twelve, starting off in a four-wheeled cart, armed with an old gun.

On another occasion, I remember seeing three boys, the oldest about twelve, heading out in a four-wheeled cart, armed with an old gun.

"Where are you going, there?"

"Where are you going?"

"To shoot pigeons."

"To shoot pigeons."

"What's that sticking out of your pocket?"

"What's that poking out of your pocket?"

"A loaded pistol;" and off they went at full swing.

"A loaded gun;" and off they went at full speed.

Thinks I to myself, if those lads don't break their necks, or blow their brains out, they will learn to take care of themselves; and I began to reflect whether this was the way they were taught to love independence.

I thought to myself, if those guys don't hurt themselves badly, they'll learn to look after themselves; and I started to wonder if this was how they were taught to value independence.

Now for a sketch of the other sex. Two horses come to the door side-saddled. Out rush, and on jump, two girls under twelve. Young Ten, upon his Two-forty, is the chaperon. "Take care!" says an anxious parent. "Oh, I'm not afraid, mother;" and away they go, galloping about the park as if they were Persians. My mind turned involuntarily homewards, and I drew a picture from life. A faithful nurse stands at the door; a young lady about twelve is mounting; a groom is on another horse, with a leading-rein strong enough to hold a line-of-battle ship in a gale of wind. The old nurse takes as long packing the young lady as if she were about to make a tour of the globe; sundry whispers are going on all the time, the purport of which is easily guessed. At last all excuses are exhausted, and off they go. The lady's nag jog-trots a little; the nurse's voice is heard—"Walk, walk, that's a dear! walk till you're comfortable in the saddle. William, mind you don't let go the rein; is it strong enough?" William smothers a laugh; the procession moves funereally, the faithful nurse watching it with an expression betokening intense anxiety. "Take care, that's a dear!" and then, as the object of her solicitude disappears among the trees, she draws a long sigh; a mutter is heard—"some accident" are the only words distinguishable; a bang of the door follows, and the affectionate nurse is—what?—probably wiping her eyes in the passage.

Now for a sketch of the other gender. Two horses arrive at the door with side saddles. Out rush two girls under twelve, jumping on. Young Ten, riding his Two-forty, is the chaperone. "Be careful!" says an anxious parent. "Oh, I'm not scared, Mom," and off they go, galloping around the park as if they were Persians. My mind drifted homeward, and I conjured a scene from life. A devoted nanny stands at the door; a girl about twelve is getting on her horse; a groom is on another horse, holding a leading rein strong enough to secure a battleship in a storm. The old nanny takes as long preparing the girl as if she were about to embark on a world tour; whispers are exchanged all the while, their meaning easily guessed. Finally, all excuses are used up, and they set off. The girl’s horse does a gentle jog-trot; the nanny’s voice is heard—“Walk, walk, that’s a good girl! Walk until you’re comfortable in the saddle. William, make sure you don’t let go of the rein; is it strong enough?” William stifles a laugh; the procession moves slowly, the devoted nanny watching it with a look of deep concern. “Be careful, that’s a good girl!” And then, as the girl disappears among the trees, she lets out a long sigh; a mutter is heard—“some accident” are the only distinguishable words; a door slams, and the caring nanny is—what?—probably wiping her eyes in the hallway.

Here are two systems which may be said to vary a little, and might require my consideration, were it not that I have no daughters, partly owing, doubtless, to the primary deficiency of a wife. At all events, I have at present no time for further reflections; for the waggon is waiting at the door, the traps are all in, and there stand mine host and his lady, as ready to speed the parting as they were to welcome the coming guest. A hearty shake of the hand, and farewell to Hospitality Hall. May no cloud ever shade the happiness of its worthy inmates!

Here are two systems that might be slightly different and could use my attention if I had daughters, which I don't, mostly because I don’t have a wife. Anyway, I currently don’t have time to think any further; the wagon is ready outside, all my stuff is packed, and the host and his wife are just as eager to see me off as they were to welcome me when I arrived. A warm handshake, and it’s goodbye to Hospitality Hall. I hope no cloud ever shadows the happiness of its deserving residents!

As we drive on, I may as well tell you that Canandaigua is a beautiful little village, situated on a slope descending towards a lake of the same name, and therefore commanding a lovely view—for when is a sheet of water not lovely? There are some very pretty little villas in the upper part of the village, which is a long broad street, with trees on either side, and is peopled by a cozy little community of about four thousand. Here we are in the open country. What is the first novelty that strikes the eye?—the snake fences; and a tickler they would prove to any hot-headed Melton gentleman who might try to sky over them. They are from six to seven feet high—sometimes higher—and are formed by laying long split logs one over another diagonally, by which simple process the necessity of nails or uprights is avoided; and as wood is dirt-cheap, the additional length caused by their diagonal construction is of no importance;—but, being all loose, they are as awkward to leap as a swing-bar, which those who have once got a cropper at, are not anxious to try again.

As we drive along, I should mention that Canandaigua is a beautiful little village located on a slope leading down to a lake of the same name, offering a lovely view—when is water not beautiful? There are some charming little houses in the upper part of the village, which has a long broad street lined with trees and is home to a cozy community of about four thousand people. Now we're in the countryside. What’s the first thing that catches the eye?—the snake fences; and they would be a challenge for any hot-headed gentleman from Melton who might try to jump over them. They stand six to seven feet tall—sometimes even higher—and are made by layering long split logs diagonally, which cleverly avoids the need for nails or support posts; and since wood is very cheap, the extra length from the diagonal design doesn’t really matter—but because they’re all loose, they’re as tricky to jump as a swing bar, which those who have fallen from it aren’t eager to try again.

It is at all times a cheery thing to go bowling along behind a spicy team, but especially so when traversing a wild and half-cultivated country, where everything around you is strange to the eye, and where the vastness of space conveys a feeling of grandeur; nor is it the less enjoyable when the scenery is decked in the rich attire of autumn, and seen through the medium of a clear and cloudless sky. Then, again, there is something peculiarly pleasing while gazing at the great extent of rich timbered land, in reflecting that it is crying aloud for the stalwart arm of man, and pointing to the girdle of waving fields which surround it, to assure that stalwart arm that industry will meet a sure reward. Poverty may well hide her head in shame amid such scenes as these, for it can only be the fruit of wilful indolence.

It's always a joyful experience to ride along behind a lively team, but it's especially delightful when traveling through a wild and partially cultivated area, where everything around you looks unfamiliar, and the vastness of space gives a sense of greatness. It’s even more enjoyable when the landscape is dressed in the rich colors of autumn, viewed under a clear, cloudless sky. Additionally, there’s something particularly satisfying about looking at the expansive, lush forested land and realizing that it’s calling out for the strong efforts of people, suggesting that those efforts will certainly be rewarded as they see the surrounding fields in motion. In such scenes, poverty can only feel ashamed, as it’s clearly the result of willful laziness.

The farm cottages are all built of wood, painted white, and look as clean and fresh as so many new-built model dairies. The neat little churches, too, appeared as bright as though the painters had left them the evening before. And here I must remark a convenience attached to them, which it might be well to imitate in those of our own churches which are situated in out-of-the-way districts, such as the Highlands of Scotland, where many of the congregation have to come from a considerable distance. The convenience I allude to is simply a long, broad shed, open all one side of its length, and fitted with rings, &c., for tethering the horses of those who, from fancy, distance, age, or sickness, are unwilling or unable to come on foot. The expense would be but small, and the advantage great. Onward speed our dapper greys, fresh as four-year-olds; and the further we go, the better they seem to like it. The only bait they get is five minutes' breathing time, and a great bucket of water, which they seem to relish as much as if it were a magnum of iced champagne. The avenue before us leads into Geneseo, the place of our destination, where my kind friend, Mr. Wadsworth, was waiting to welcome us to his charming little country-place, situated just outside the village. 'And what a beautiful place is this same Geneseo! But, for the present, we must discharge our faithful greys—see our new friends, old and young—enjoy a better bait than our nags did at the half-way house, indulge in the fragrant Havana, and retire to roost. To-morrow we will talk of the scenery.

The farm cottages are all made of wood, painted white, and look as clean and fresh as brand-new model dairies. The neat little churches also appeared as bright as if the painters had just left the evening before. I should point out a convenience related to them, which could be beneficial to replicate in our own churches located in remote areas, like the Highlands of Scotland, where many congregation members have to travel quite a distance. This convenience I mention is simply a long, wide shed, open on one side, equipped with rings, etc., for tying up the horses of those who, for various reasons like preference, distance, age, or illness, are unwilling or unable to walk. The cost would be minimal, and the benefits significant. Our lively greys move swiftly, as fresh as four-year-olds; and the farther we go, the more they seem to enjoy it. The only break they get is five minutes of rest and a big bucket of water, which they seem to savor as much as if it were a magnum of iced champagne. The path ahead leads into Geneseo, our destination, where my kind friend, Mr. Wadsworth, is waiting to welcome us to his lovely little country home, just outside the village. "And what a beautiful place Geneseo is! But for now, we need to take care of our loyal greys—meet our new friends, both old and young—enjoy a better treat than our horses did at the halfway house, indulge in the fragrant Havana, and settle in for the night. Tomorrow we’ll discuss the scenery.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

As a similar expression occurs frequently in this work, the reader is requested to remember that it is a common custom in America to name a horse according to the time in which he can trot a mile. The boy evidently had a visionary idea in his mind that the little hack he was asking permission to ride, had accomplished the feat of trotting a mile in two minutes and forty seconds.



CHAPTER V.

Geneseo.




It is a lovely bright autumn morning, with a pure blue sky, and a pearly atmosphere through which scarce a zephyr is stealing; the boughs of the trees hang motionless; my window is open; but, how strange the perfect stillness! No warbling note comes from the feathered tribe to greet the rising sun, and sing, with untaught voice, their Maker's praise; even the ubiquitous house-sparrow is neither seen nor heard. How strange this comparative absence of animal life in a country which, having been so recently intruded upon by the destroyer—man—one would expect to find superabundantly populated with those animals, against which he does not make war either for his use or amusement. Nevertheless, so it is; and I have often strolled about for hours in the woods, in perfect solitude, with no sound to meet the ear—no life to catch the eye. But I am wandering from the house too soon;—a jolly scream in the nursery reminds me that, at all events, there is animal life within, and that the possessor thereof has no disease of the lungs.

It’s a beautiful, bright autumn morning, with a clear blue sky and a fresh atmosphere where hardly a breeze is blowing; the branches of the trees hang still. My window is open, but how strange the complete silence! No cheerful songs come from the birds to welcome the rising sun and sing, with their natural voices, praises to their Creator; even the common house sparrow is neither seen nor heard. How odd it is that there’s such a lack of animal life in a place that has recently been invaded by the destroyer—man—where you would expect to see a lot of animals that he doesn’t hunt for either food or fun. Still, that’s the way it is; I’ve often wandered for hours in the woods, in total solitude, without a sound to hear or any life to see. But I’m leaving the house too soon; a cheerful shout from the nursery reminds me that, at least, there is life inside, and that the little one has no lung issues.

Let us now speed to breakfast; for folk are early in the New World, and do not lie a-bed all the forenoon, thinking how to waste the afternoon, and then, when the afternoon comes, try and relieve the tedium thereof by cooking up some project to get over the ennui of the evening. Whatever else you may deny the American, this one virtue you must allow him. He is, emphatically, an early riser; as much so as our own most gracious Sovereign, whose example, if followed by her subjects—especially some in the metropolis—would do more to destroy London hells, and improve London health, than the Legislature, or Sir B. Hall, and all the College of Surgeons, can ever hope to effect among the post-meridian drones.

Let’s hurry to breakfast; people are up early in the New World and don’t lie in bed all morning, thinking about how to waste the afternoon, and then, when the afternoon arrives, try to relieve the boredom by coming up with some idea to get through the evening’s tediousness. Whatever else you can say about Americans, you have to give them this one credit: they are definitely early risers, just like our own gracious Sovereign. If her subjects—especially some in the city—took her example to heart, it would do more to shut down the seedy spots in London and improve the public’s health than what the Legislature, Sir B. Hall, or the entire College of Surgeons could ever achieve among the late-night slackers.

Breakfast was speedily despatched, and Senor Cabaños y Carvajal followed as a matter of course. While reducing him to ashes, and luxuriating in the clouds which proclaim his certain though lingering death, we went out upon the terrace before the house to wish good speed to my two companions who were just starting, and to enjoy a view of the far-famed vale of Genesee. Far as the eye could see, with no bounds save the power of its vision, was one wide expanse of varied beauty. The dark forest hues were relieved by the rich tints of the waving corn; neat little cottages peeped out in every direction. Here and there, a village, with its taper steeples, recalled the bounteous Hand "that giveth us all things richly to enjoy." Below my feet was beautifully undulating park ground, magnificently timbered, through which peeped the river, bright as silver beneath the rays of an unclouded sun, whose beams, streaming at the same time on a field of the rich-coloured pumpkin, burnished each like a ball of molten gold. All around was richness, beauty, and abundance.

Breakfast was quickly finished, and Señor Cabaños y Carvajal followed suit as usual. As we reduced him to ashes, basking in the clouds that hinted at his certain but lingering death, we stepped out onto the terrace in front of the house to wish my two companions a safe journey and to take in the famous view of the Genesee Valley. As far as the eye could see, there was an endless expanse of stunning beauty. The dark greens of the forest contrasted with the vibrant colors of the swaying corn, and charming little cottages peeked out from every direction. Here and there, a village with its tall steeples reminded us of the generous Hand "that gives us all things richly to enjoy." Below me was beautifully rolling parkland, magnificently forested, through which the river sparkled like silver under the rays of a clear sun, its beams shining on a field of rich-colored pumpkins, making each one look like a ball of molten gold. All around was wealth, beauty, and abundance.

The descendant of a Wellington or a Washington, while contemplating the glorious deeds of an illustrious ancestor, and recalling the adoration of a grateful country, may justly feel his breast swelling with pride and emulation; but while I was enjoying this scene, there stood one at my side within whom also such emotions might be as fully and justly stirred—for there are great men to be found in less conspicuous, though not less useful spheres of life. A son who knew its history enjoyed with me this goodly scene. His father was the first bold pioneer. The rut made by the wheel of his rude cart, drawn by two oxen, was the first impress made by civilization in the whole of this rich and far-famed valley. A brother shared with him his early toils and privations; their own hands raised the log-hut—their new home in the wilderness. Ere they broke ground, the boundless forest howled around a stray party of Indians, come to hunt, or to pasture their flocks on the few open plots skirting the river: all else was waste and solitude. One brother died comparatively early; but the father of mine host lived long to enjoy the fruit of his labours. He lived to see industry and self-denial metamorphose that forest and its straggling Indian band into a land bursting with the rich fruits of the soil, and buzzing with a busy hive of human energy and intelligence. Yes; and he lived to see temple after temple, raised for the pure worship of the True God, supplant the ignorance and idolatry which reigned undisturbed at his first coming. Say, then, reader, has not the son of such a father just cause for pride—a solemn call to emulation? The patriarchal founder of his family and their fortunes has left an imperishable monument of his greatness in the prosperity of this rich vale; and Providence has blessed his individual energies and forethought with an unusual amount of this world's good things. "Honour and fame—industry and wealth," are inscribed on the banner of his life, and the son is worthily fighting under the paternal standard. The park grounds below the house bear evidence of his appreciation of the beauties of scenery, in the taste with which he has performed that difficult task of selecting the groups of trees requisite for landscape, while cutting down a forest; and the most cursory view of his library can leave no doubt that his was a highly-cultivated mind. I will add no more, lest I be led insensibly to trench upon the privacy of domestic life.

The descendant of a Wellington or a Washington, while reflecting on the impressive achievements of a famous ancestor and remembering the admiration of a grateful nation, may understandably feel a sense of pride and aspiration; but as I enjoyed this scene, there stood someone beside me who could just as easily feel such emotions—because there are great individuals found in less obvious but equally important areas of life. A son who knew the history experienced this beautiful scene with me. His father was the original brave pioneer. The trail left by the wheel of his rough cart, pulled by two oxen, was the first mark of civilization in this rich and renowned valley. A brother shared the early struggles and hardships with him; they built their log cabin—their new home in the wilderness—with their own hands. Before they started, the endless forest echoed with the howls of a few wandering Indians, come to hunt or to graze their animals on the few open patches by the river, as everything else was untouched and isolated. One brother passed away relatively young; but the father of my host lived on to witness the results of his efforts. He lived to see hard work and sacrifice transform that forest and its wandering Indian group into a land filled with the bountiful produce of the earth, buzzing with active human energy and intelligence. Yes; and he lived to see church after church built for the true worship of God, replacing the ignorance and idolatry that prevailed when he first arrived. So, dear reader, does the son of such a father not have every reason to feel proud—a serious motivation to strive for greatness? The founding patriarch of his family and their fortunes has left an enduring symbol of his greatness in the prosperity of this affluent valley; and Providence has rewarded his individual efforts and foresight with an extraordinary share of life's blessings. "Honor and fame—hard work and wealth" are written on the banner of his life, and the son is rightfully fighting under his father's standard. The parkland below the house reflects his appreciation for scenic beauty, demonstrated by the skill with which he selected the groups of trees needed for landscaping while clearing a forest; and even a quick glance at his library makes it clear that he possesses a highly cultivated mind. I will say no more, lest I inadvertently intrude on the privacy of family life.

I now propose to give a slight sketch of his farm, so as to convey, to those interested, an idea of the general system of agriculture adopted in the Northern States; and if the reader think the subject dull, a turn of the leaf will prove a simple remedy.

I now plan to provide a brief overview of his farm to give those interested an idea of the general farming practices used in the Northern States. And if the reader finds the topic boring, just turning the page will offer an easy solution.

The extent farmed is 2000 acres, of which 400 are in wood, 400 in meadow, 400 under plough, and 800 in pasture. On the wheat lands, summer fallow, wheat, and clover pasture, form the three years' rotation. In summer fallow, the clover is sometimes ploughed in, and sometimes fed off, according to the wants of the soil and the farm. Alluvial lands are cultivated in Indian corn from five to ten years successively, and then laid down in grass indeterminately from three to forty years. Wheat—sometimes broadcast, sometimes drilled—is put in as near as possible the 1st of September, and cut from the 10th to the 20th of July. Clover-seed is sown during March in wheat, and left till the following year. Wheat stubble is pastured slightly; the clover, if mowed, is cut in the middle of June; if pastured, the cattle are turned in about the 1st of May.

The total area farmed is 2,000 acres, with 400 acres in woods, 400 in meadows, 400 under cultivation, and 800 in pastures. On the wheat fields, the rotation consists of summer fallow, wheat, and clover pasture over three years. During the summer fallow, clover is sometimes plowed in, and sometimes fed off, depending on the needs of the soil and the farm. Alluvial lands are cultivated with corn for five to ten years in a row and then left to grow grass for an indefinite period ranging from three to forty years. Wheat—sometimes broadcast and sometimes drilled—is planted as close to September 1st as possible and harvested between July 10th and July 20th. Clover seed is sown in March in the wheat and left until the following year. Wheat stubble is lightly grazed; if the clover is mowed, it is cut in mid-June, and if it’s grazed, the cattle are let in around May 1st.

Pumpkins are raised with the Indian corn, and hogs fattened on them; during the summer they are turned into clover pasture. Indian corn and pumpkins are planted in May, and harvested in October; the leaf and stalk of the Indian corn are cut up for fodder, and very much liked. Oats and barley are not extensively cultivated.

Pumpkins are grown alongside Indian corn, and hogs are fed on them; during the summer, they are allowed to graze in clover fields. Indian corn and pumpkins are planted in May and harvested in October; the leaves and stalks of the Indian corn are chopped up for feed, which is very popular. Oats and barley are not widely farmed.

The average crop of Indian corn is from fifty to sixty bushels, and of wheat, from twenty-five to thirty per acre. The pasture land supports one head to one and one-third acre. Grass-fattened cattle go to market from September to November, fetching 2-1/4d. per lb. live weight, or 4-1/2d. per lb. for beef alone. Cattle are kept upon hay and straw from the middle of November to 1st of May, if intended for fattening upon grass; but, if intended for spring market, they are fed on Indian corn-meal in addition. Sheep are kept on hay exclusively, from the middle of November to the 1st of April. A good specimen of Durham ox, three and a half years old, weighs 1500 lbs. live weight. The farm is provided with large scales for weighing hay, cattle, &c., and so arranged, that one hundred head can easily be weighed in two hours.

The average yield of corn in India is between fifty and sixty bushels, while wheat produces around twenty-five to thirty bushels per acre. The pasture land supports one animal for every one to one and a third acres. Cattle that are grass-fed go to market from September to November, selling for 2-1/4d per pound of live weight, or 4-1/2d per pound for just the beef. Cattle are fed hay and straw from mid-November to May 1st if they are meant to be fattened on grass; however, if they are intended for the spring market, they also receive Indian cornmeal. Sheep are fed exclusively on hay from mid-November to April 1st. A good Durham ox that is three and a half years old weighs about 1,500 pounds live weight. The farm has large scales for weighing hay, cattle, etc., and is set up so that one hundred animals can be weighed in just two hours.

No manure is used, except farm-pen and gypsum; the former is generally applied to Indian corn and meadow land. The gypsum is thrown, a bushel to the acre, on each crop of wheat and clover—cost of gypsum, ten shillings for twenty bushels. A mowing machine, with two or three horses and one man, can cut, in one day, twelve acres of heavy meadow land, if it stand up; but if laid at all, from six to ten. The number of men employed on the farm is, six for six months, twelve for three months, and twenty-five for three months. Ten horses and five yoke of oxen are kept for farm purposes. The common waggon used weighs eight hundredweight, and holds fifty bushels. Sometimes they are ten hundredweight, and hold one hundred and five bushels.

No manure is used except for farm-pen and gypsum; the former is usually applied to corn and meadows. Gypsum is spread at a bushel per acre on every crop of wheat and clover—costing ten shillings for twenty bushels. A mowing machine powered by two or three horses and one person can cut twelve acres of thick meadow land in a day if it’s upright; if it’s flat, it can only cut six to ten acres. There are six men working on the farm for six months, twelve for three months, and twenty-five for another three months. The farm keeps ten horses and five yoke of oxen. The standard wagon used weighs eight hundredweight and carries fifty bushels. Sometimes, they weigh ten hundredweight and can hold one hundred and five bushels.

The wages of the farm servants are:—For those engaged by the year, 2l. 10s. a month; for six months, 2l. 18s. 6d. a month; for three months, 3l. 11s. a month—besides board and lodging, on the former of which they are not likely to find their bones peeping through their skin. They have meat three times a day—pork five days, and mutton two days in the week—a capital pie at dinner; tea and sugar twice a day; milk ad libitum; vegetables twice a day; butter usually three times a day; no spirits nor beer are allowed. The meals are all cooked at the farm, and the overseer eats with the men, and receives from 75l. to 125l. a year, besides board and lodging for his family, who keep the farm-house. When every expense is paid, mine host netts a clear six per cent. on his farm, and I think you will allow that he may go to bed at night with little fear of the nightmare of a starving labourer disturbing his slumbers. Not that he troubles sleep much, for he is the nearest thing to perpetual motion I ever saw, not excepting even the armadillo at the Zoological Gardens, and he has more "irons in the fire" than there were bayonet-points before Sevastopol.

The wages for farm workers are: for those hired for a year, £2.10 a month; for six months, £2.18.6 a month; for three months, £3.11 a month—plus food and shelter, for which they certainly won’t be starving. They get meat three times a day—pork five days a week and mutton two days a week—a great pie at dinner; tea and sugar twice a day; unlimited milk; vegetables twice daily; and butter usually three times a day; no alcohol or beer is allowed. All meals are prepared at the farm, and the overseer eats with the workers, earning between £75 and £125 a year, along with food and housing for his family, who manage the farmhouse. After covering all expenses, the host makes a clear six percent profit from the farm, and I think you’d agree that he can sleep soundly at night without worrying about a starving worker disturbing his rest. Not that he sleeps much, as he is the closest thing to nonstop energy I have ever seen, even more than the armadillo at the zoo, and he has more “irons in the fire” than there were bayonets before Sebastopol.

The village contains a population of two thousand inhabitants, and consists of a few streets, the principal of which runs along a terrace, which, being a continuation of the one on which we were lately standing, commands the same lovely view. But, small as is the village, it has four churches, an academy, two banks, two newspaper offices, and a telegraph office. What a slow coach you are, John Bull!

The village has a population of two thousand residents and consists of a few streets, the main one of which runs along a terrace that, being a continuation of the one we were just on, offers the same beautiful view. But, as small as the village is, it has four churches, an academy, two banks, two newspaper offices, and a telegraph office. What a slowpoke you are, John Bull!

One day I was taking a drive with an amiable couple, who, having been married sixteen or seventeen years, had got well over the mysterious influences of honeymoonism. The husband was acting Jarvey, and I was inside with madame. The roads being in some places very bad, and neither the lady nor myself being feather-weight, the springs were frequently brought down upon one another with a very disagreeable jerk. The lady remonstrated:

One day, I was driving with a friendly couple who, after being married for sixteen or seventeen years, had moved past the mysterious effects of the honeymoon phase. The husband was driving, and I was sitting inside with his wife. Since the roads were pretty rough in some areas, and neither of us was light, the car's springs often slammed down on each other with an unpleasant jolt. The lady complained:

"John, I declare these springs are worn out, and the carriage itself is little better."

"John, I say these springs are worn out, and the carriage itself isn't much better."

"Now, Susan, what's the good of your talking that way; you know they are perfectly good, my dear."

"Now, Susan, what's the point of you talking like that? You know they're perfectly fine, my dear."

"Oh, John! you know what I say is true, and that the carriage has never been touched since we married."

"Oh, John! You know what I'm saying is true, and that the carriage hasn't been touched since we got married."

"My dear, if I prove to you one of your assertions is wrong, I suppose you will be ready to grant the others may be equally incorrect."

"My dear, if I show you that one of your claims is wrong, I assume you’ll be willing to admit that the others might also be incorrect."

"Well, what then?" said the unsuspecting wife.

"Well, what now?" said the unsuspecting wife.

"Why, my dear, I'll prove to you the springs are in perfectly good order," said the malicious husband, who descried a most abominable bit of road ready for his purpose; and, suiting the action to the word, he put his spicy nags into a hand-canter. Bang went the springs together; and, despite of all the laws of gravitation, madame and I kept bobbing up and down, and into one another's laps.

"Why, my dear, I’ll show you that the springs are in great condition," said the mischievous husband, who spotted a particularly terrible patch of road perfect for his plan; and, following through with his words, he pushed his spirited horses into a hand-gallop. The springs went bang, and despite all the laws of gravity, both Madame and I kept bouncing up and down, landing in each other's laps.

"Oh, John, stop! stop!"

"Oh, John, stop! Stop!"

"No, no, my dear, I shall go on till you're perfectly satisfied with the goodness of the springs and the soundness of the carriage."

"No, no, my dear, I'm going to keep going until you're completely satisfied with how great the springs are and how sturdy the carriage is."

Resistance was useless; John was determined, and the horses would not have tired in a week; so the victim had nothing for it but to cry peccavi, upon which John moderated his pace gradually, and our elastic bounds ceased correspondingly, until we settled once more firmly on our respective cushions; then John turned round, and, with a mixed expression of malice and generosity, said, "Well, my dear, I do think the carriage wants a new lining, but you must admit they are really good springs." And the curtain fell on this little scene in the drama of "Sixteen Years after Marriage." May the happy couple live to re-enact the same sixty years after marriage!

Resistance was pointless; John was set on his course, and the horses could easily go for a week without tiring; so the victim had no choice but to admit defeat, after which John gradually slowed down, and we both settled back comfortably into our seats; then John turned around and, with a mix of mischief and generosity, said, "Well, my dear, I really think the carriage needs a new lining, but you have to admit those springs are pretty great." And that was the end of this little scene in the story of "Sixteen Years after Marriage." May the happy couple live long enough to reenact the same thing sixty years after marriage!

Our drive brought us to the shore of Lake Canesus, and a lovely scene it was; the banks were in many places timbered to the water's edge by the virgin forest, now radiant with the rich autumnal tints; the afternoon sun shone forth in all its glory from a cloudless sky, on a ripp'less lake, which, like a burnished mirror, reflected with all the truthfulness of nature the gorgeous scene above; and as you gazed on the azure abyss below, it kept receding and receding till the wearied sight of the creature was lost in the fathomless depths of the work of his Almighty Creator. Who has not for the moment imagined that he could realise the infinity of space, as, when gazing at some bright star, he strives to measure the distance of the blue curtain spread behind, which, ever receding, so mocks the efforts of the ambitious eye, that its powers become bewildered in the unfathomable depths of immensity; but I am not sure whether such feelings do not come home to one more powerfully when the eye gazes on the same object through the medium of reflection;—for, as with the bounties of the Creator, so with the wonders of His creation—man is too prone to undervalue them in proportion to the frequency with which they are spread before him; and thus the deep azure vault, so often seen in the firmament above, is less likely to attract his attention and engage his meditations, than when the same glorious scene lies mirrored beneath his feet.

Our drive took us to the shore of Lake Canesus, and it was a beautiful sight; the banks were lined in many places with untouched forest right down to the water's edge, now glowing with vibrant autumn colors. The afternoon sun shone brilliantly from a clear sky onto a calm lake that, like a polished mirror, accurately reflected the stunning scene above. As you looked at the deep blue water below, it seemed to stretch on indefinitely until your tired eyes lost themselves in the endless depths created by the Almighty. Who hasn't, for a moment, felt they could grasp the vastness of space while staring at a bright star, trying to measure the distance of the blue background that keeps receding, mocking the ambitious eye until it becomes confused in the boundless depths of enormity? But I wonder if these feelings don't resonate more strongly when we see the same object through reflection; because, just like with the gifts from the Creator, people often underestimate the wonders of His creation due to how frequently they encounter them. Thus, the deep blue sky, so often visible above, is less likely to catch someone's attention and engage their thoughts compared to when the same magnificent scene is mirrored at their feet.

This charming lake has comparatively little cultivation on its borders; two or three cottages, and a few cattle grazing, are the only signs that man is asserting his dominion over the wilderness. One of these cottages belongs to a member of the Wadsworth family, who owns some extent of land in the neighbourhood, and who has built a nice little boat for sailing about in the summer season. I may as well mention in this place, that the roofing generally used for cottages is a wooden tile called "shingle," which is very cheap—twelve-and-sixpence purchasing enough to cover a thousand feet.

This charming lake has relatively little development around it; just a few cottages and some cattle grazing are the only signs that humans are claiming their space in the wilderness. One of these cottages belongs to a member of the Wadsworth family, who owns a decent amount of land in the area and has built a nice little boat for summer sailing. I should also mention here that the roofing commonly used for cottages is a wooden tile called "shingle," which is quite affordable—twelve-and-sixpence buys enough to cover a thousand square feet.

While driving about in this neighbourhood, I saw, for the first time, what is termed a "plank-road,"—a system which has been introduced into the United States from Canada. The method of construction is very simple, consisting of two stringers of oak two inches square, across which are laid three-inch planks eight feet long, and generally of hemlock or pine. No spiking of the planks into the stringers is required, and a thin layer of sand or soil being placed over all, the road is made; and, as the material for construction is carried along as the work progresses, the rapidity of execution is astonishing. When completed, it is as smooth as a bowling-green. The only objection I ever heard to these roads is, that the jarring sensation produced by them is very injurious to the horses' legs; but it can hardly be thought that, if the cart were up to the axle and the horse up to the belly-band in a good clay soil, any advantage would be derived from such a primitive state of things. Taking an average, the roads may be said to last from eight to ten years, and cost about £330 a mile. Those in Canada are often made much broader, so as to enable two vehicles to pass abreast, and their cost is a little above £400 a mile. The toll here is about three-farthings a mile per horse. They have had the good sense to avoid the ridiculous wheel-tollage to which we adhere at home with a tenacity only equalled by its folly, as if a two-wheeled cart, with a ton weight of cargo, drawn by a Barclay and Perkinser, did not cut up a road much more than the little four-wheel carriage of the clergyman's wife, drawn by a cob pony, and laden with a tin of soup or a piece of flannel for some suffering parishioner. But as our ancestors adopted this system "in the year dot, before one was invented," I suppose we shall bequeath the precious legacy to our latest posterity, unless some "Rebecca League," similar to Taffy's a few years since, be got up on a grand national scale, in which case tolls may, perhaps, be included in the tariff of free-trade. Until that auspicious event take place,—for I confess to an ever-increasing antipathy to paying any gate,—we might profit in some of our bleak and dreary districts by copying the simple arrangement adopted at many American tolls, which consists of throwing a covered archway over the road; so that if you have to unbutton half-a-dozen coats in a snow-storm to find a sixpence, you are not necessitated to button-in a bucketful of snow, which, though it may cool the body, has a very opposite effect on the temper.

While driving around this neighborhood, I saw, for the first time, what’s called a "plank-road," a system that has been brought into the United States from Canada. The construction method is really straightforward, consisting of two oak beams that are two inches square, with three-inch planks that are eight feet long laid across them, usually made of hemlock or pine. There's no need to spike the planks into the beams, and once a thin layer of sand or soil is spread over everything, the road is finished. Plus, since the materials are transported as the work goes along, the speed of construction is astonishing. When it's done, it’s as smooth as a bowling green. The only downside I’ve ever heard about these roads is that the jarring sensation they create is harmful to the horses' legs; but honestly, if a cart is deep in mud and the horse is almost submerged, I doubt there’s much benefit from such a basic setup. On average, these roads last from eight to ten years and cost about £330 per mile. The ones in Canada are often built wider, allowing two vehicles to pass side by side, costing a bit over £400 per mile. The toll here is about three-farthings a mile per horse. They’ve wisely avoided the ridiculous wheel toll system we stick to back home with a stubbornness that matches its absurdity, as if a two-wheeled cart loaded with a ton being pulled by a heavy-duty horse does less damage to the road than a small four-wheel carriage of a clergyman's wife pulled by a pony and carrying a tin of soup or a piece of fabric for a needy parishioner. But since our ancestors adopted this system "in the year dot, before one was invented," I suppose we’ll pass this silly legacy down to future generations, unless a movement similar to the “Rebecca League” from a few years back comes together on a national scale, in which case tolls might be included in free trade discussions. Until that fortunate day arrives — I admit I’m increasingly annoyed by paying tolls — we could benefit in some of our bleak and dreary areas by copying the simple setup used at many American tolls, which involves putting a covered archway over the road. This way, if you have to unbutton a bunch of coats in a snowstorm to find a sixpence, you won’t have to put a bucketful of snow back inside, which might chill your body but definitely makes your temper worse.

It is bad enough in England; but any one who wishes to enjoy it to perfection had better take a drive from Stirling, crossing the Forth, when, if he select his road happily, he may have the satisfaction of paying half-a-dozen tolls in nearly as many minutes, on the plea that this piece of ground, the size of a cocked-hat-box,—and that piece, the size of a cabbage-garden,—and so on, belong to different counties; and his amusement may derive additional zest if he be fortunate enough to find the same tollman there whom I met some years ago. When passing his toll in a driving snow-storm that penetrated even to the very marrow, I pulled up a few yards beyond the gate, upon which he came out very sulkily, took the half-crown I tendered him, and, walking deliberately back, placed the change on the post of the gate, and said,—"If ye want 'ut, ye may take 'ut; it's no my place to walk half a mile o' the road to gie folk their change;" after which courteous address he disappeared, banging his door to with a sound that fell on the ear very like "Put that in your pipe and smoke it." Precious work I had, with a heavy dog-cart, no servant, and a hack whose mouth was case-hardened. I would willingly have given it up; but I knew the brute (the man, not the horse) would very soon have got drunk upon it; so I persevered until I succeeded, and then went on my road full of thoughts which are, I fear, totally unfit to be committed to paper.

It’s pretty bad in England, but if you want to really enjoy it, you should take a drive from Stirling, crossing the Forth. If you pick your route wisely, you might get the satisfaction of paying half a dozen tolls in just about as many minutes, all because this little stretch of land, the size of a hat box—and that other one, the size of a vegetable patch—and so on, belong to different counties. Your trip could be even more entertaining if you’re lucky enough to encounter the same toll attendant I met a few years back. When I passed through his toll booth during a driving snowstorm that cut through to my bones, I stopped a few yards past the gate. He came out looking grumpy, took the half-crown I offered, and walked back slowly, placing the change on the gate post. He said, “If you want it, you can take it; it’s not my job to walk half a mile down the road to give people their change.” After his charming little speech, he vanished, slamming the door behind him with a noise that sounded a lot like “Deal with it.” I had a tough time managing a heavy dog cart, with no servant, and a horse whose mouth was tough as nails. I would have gladly given up, but I knew the jerk (the man, not the horse) would soon be drunk on it, so I kept going until I managed to get through, and then continued on my way, full of thoughts that I’m afraid aren’t fit to be written down.

Reader, I must ask you to forgive my wanderings on the banks of the Forth. I hasten back to Geneseo, and pack up ready for to-morrow's start, for the days I had spent with my kind host and his merry family had slipped by so pleasantly I had quite lost count of them. There was but one cloud to our enjoyment—one sad blank in the family group: my sister-in-law, in whose charming society I had fondly hoped to make my first visit to the scenes of her early youth, had been recently summoned to a better world; and the void her absence made in that family circle, of which she was both the radiating and the centring point of affection, was too deeply felt for aught but time ever to eradicate.

Reader, I ask you to forgive my ramblings by the banks of the Forth. I'm quickly heading back to Geneseo, packing up for tomorrow's departure, as the days I spent with my kind host and his cheerful family flew by so pleasantly that I completely lost track of them. There was only one cloud over our enjoyment—one sad absence in the family: my sister-in-law, whose delightful company I had hoped to enjoy as I visited the places of her early youth, had recently passed away; and the void her absence created in that family circle, where she was both the source and the center of affection, was too deeply felt for anything but time to heal.


CHAPTER VI.

Stirring Scenes and Strange Sights.




My host having kindly lent me his carriage and a pair of wiry nags, I started for Batavia to meet the railway. The distance was about thirty miles, and the road in many places execrable—in one part so bad that we had to go through a quarter of a mile of wood, as it was absolutely impassable;—yet, despite all these hindrances, and without pressing the horses in the least, we completed the distance in the three hours, including from five to ten minutes at a half-way house, where we gave them the usual American bait of a bucket of cold water; and when we arrived they were as fresh as four-year-olds, and quite ready to return if need had been. I saw nothing worth remarking during the drive. There was plenty of cultivated land; and plenty of waste, waiting to reward the labourer. All the little villages had their daguerreotype shops except one, and there the deficiency was supplied by a perambulating artist in a tented cart.

My host kindly lent me his carriage and a pair of spirited horses, so I set off for Batavia to catch the train. The distance was about thirty miles, and the road was terrible in many spots—at one point so bad that we had to go through a quarter of a mile of woods because it was completely impassable; yet, despite all these obstacles, and without pushing the horses at all, we made the trip in three hours, including five to ten minutes at a halfway house, where we gave them the usual American treat of a bucket of cold water. When we arrived, they were as fresh as young horses and ready to go back if needed. I didn’t see anything particularly noteworthy during the drive. There was plenty of farmland and lots of wasteland, just waiting for someone to farm it. All the small villages had their photo shops except for one, where a traveling artist in a tented cart filled the gap.

When a railway crosses the road, you are expected to see it,—the only warning being a large painted board, inscribed "Look out for the Train." If it be dark, I suppose you are expected to guess it; but it must be remembered that this is the country of all countries where every person is required to look after himself. The train coming up soon after my arrival, I went on to Buffalo, amid a railway mixture of tag-rag-and-bobtail, squalling infancy and expectorating manhood. On arriving at the terminus, I engaged a cab, and, after waiting half an hour, I found that Jarvey was trying to pick up some other "fare," not thinking myself and my servant a sufficient cargo to pay well. I tried to find a railway official; but I might almost as well have looked for a flea in a flower-garden—no badges, no distinctive marks, the station full of all the riff-raff of the town;—it was hopeless. At last, by a lucky accident, I saw a man step into a small office, so I bolted after him, like a terrier after a badger, but I could not draw him; he knew nothing about the cabs—he was busy—nay, in short, he would not be bothered. Having experienced this beautiful specimen of Buffalo railway management, I returned to the open air and lit my cigar. After some time, Cabby, having found that no other "fare" was to be had, condescended to tell me he was ready; so in I got, and drove to the hotel, on entering which I nearly broke my neck over a pyramid of boxes, all looking of one family. They turned out to be the property of Mr. G.V. Brooke, the actor, who had just arrived "to star it" at Buffalo. Supper being ready, as it always is on the arrival of the evening train, I repaired thither, and found the usual wondrous medley which the American tables d'hôte exhibit, the usual deafening clatter, the usual profusion of eatables, the usual rapidity of action, and the usual disagreeable odour which is consequent upon such a mass of humanity and food combined. Being tolerably tired, I very soon retired to roost.

When a railway crosses the road, you're expected to see it—the only warning is a big sign that says "Look out for the Train." If it's dark, I guess you're just supposed to figure it out; but keep in mind, this is the place where everyone is expected to take care of themselves. The train arrived shortly after I got there, and I headed to Buffalo, surrounded by a chaotic mix of people and noises—crying babies and loud adults. When I got to the station, I got a cab, but after waiting for half an hour, I realized the driver was trying to pick up another passenger, thinking that my servant and I weren't enough to make a good fare. I tried to find a railway staff member, but it was like searching for a needle in a haystack—no uniforms, no signs, just a crowd of random people; it was hopeless. Finally, I spotted a man going into a small office, so I chased after him like a terrier after a badger, but he didn’t have any information about the cabs—he was busy—essentially, he didn’t want to be bothered. After experiencing this lovely example of Buffalo railway management, I stepped outside and lit my cigar. After a while, the cab driver, realizing there were no other passengers to be had, finally decided to let me know he was ready; so I got in and we headed to the hotel. When I got inside, I almost tripped over a pile of boxes, all belonging to the same family. They turned out to be from Mr. G.V. Brooke, the actor, who had just arrived to perform in Buffalo. Dinner was ready, as it always is when the evening train arrives, so I went to eat and found the typical chaotic spread that American dining rooms have to offer: the usual loud noise, the usual abundance of food, the usual quick service, and the usual unpleasant smell that comes from so many people and so much food together. Feeling quite tired, I pretty quickly headed to bed.

What a wondrous place is this Buffalo!--what a type of American activity and enterprise! I had visited it in the year 1826, and then it had only three thousand inhabitants. The theatre, I remember, amused me immensely, the stage and accommodation for spectators barely occupying an area of twenty-five feet square. Mr. G.V. Brooke's boxes, at that time, would have filled the whole house; and here they are in 1852, drawing our metropolitan stars to their boards. Their population has increased twenty-fold, and now exceeds sixty thousand; a splendid harbour, a lighthouse, piers, breakwater, &c., have been constructed, and the place is daily increasing. Churches rear their spiry steeples in every direction. Banks and insurance offices are scattered broadcast. Educational, literary, and benevolent establishments abound, and upwards of a dozen newspapers are published. Land which, during my visit in 1826, you might almost have had for the asking, is now selling at two hundred guineas the foot of frontage for building. Even during the last ten years, the duties collected at the port have increased from £1000 to nearly £14,000. In the year 1852 upwards of four thousand vessels, representing a million and a half of tonnage, cleared at the harbour, and goods to the value of nearly seven millions sterling arrived from the lakes, the greater portion of the cargoes being grain. The value of goods annually delivered by Erie Canal is eight millions. Never was a more energetic hive of humanity than these "Buffalo lads;" and they are going ahead every day, racing pace.

What a remarkable place this Buffalo is! What a representation of American energy and enterprise! I visited it in 1826, when it had only three thousand residents. I remember the theater amused me greatly; the stage and seating for the audience took up barely twenty-five feet square. Mr. G.V. Brooke's boxes would have filled the whole place back then; and now, in 1852, they attract our big city stars to perform there. The population has grown twenty times and now exceeds sixty thousand; a fantastic harbor, a lighthouse, piers, breakwater, etc., have been built, and the area is growing every day. Churches are sprouting steeples in every direction. Banks and insurance offices are everywhere. There are plenty of educational, literary, and charitable organizations, and over a dozen newspapers are being published. Land that you could almost get for free during my visit in 1826 is now selling for two hundred guineas per foot of frontage for building. Even in the last ten years, the duties collected at the port have risen from £1000 to nearly £14,000. In 1852, over four thousand ships, totaling a million and a half tons, sailed from the harbor, and goods worth nearly seven million pounds arrived from the lakes, with most of the cargo being grain. The value of goods delivered through the Erie Canal each year is eight million pounds. There has never been a more energetic group of people than these "Buffalo lads," and they’re moving forward every day at a fast pace.

Now, John Bull, come with me to the cliff outside the town, and overhanging the Niagara river. Look across the stream, to the Canada shore, and you will see a few houses and a few people. There they have been, for aught I know, since the creation. The town(!) is called Waterloo, and the couple of dozen inhabitants, despite the rich fruits of industry on which they may gaze daily, seem to regard industry as a frightful scourge to be studiously avoided. Their soil is as rich as, if not richer than, that on the opposite shore: the same lake is spread before them, and the same river runs by their doors. It does, indeed, look hopeless, where such an example, constantly under their eyes, fails to stir them up to action. But, perhaps, you will say, you think you see a movement among the "dry bones." True, my dear Bull, there is now a movement; but, if you inquire, you will find it is a Buffalo movement. It is their energy, activity, and enterprise which, is making a railway to run across Canada to Goderich, by which means they will save, for traffic, the whole length of Lake Erie, and half that of Lake Huron, for all produce coming from the North of Michigan, Wisconsin, &c. So thoroughly is it American enterprise, that, although the terminus of the railway is at Waterloo, the name is ignored; and Buffalo enterprise having carried forward the work, it is styled the "Buffalo, Brentford, and Goderich Line." Truly, John Bull, your colony shows very badly by the side of this same Buffalo. Let us hope increasing intercourse may infuse a little vitality into them.

Now, John Bull, come with me to the cliff outside the town, overlooking the Niagara River. Look across the stream to the Canadian shore, and you’ll see a few houses and some people. They’ve probably been there since forever. The town is called Waterloo, and the couple of dozen residents, despite being surrounded by the benefits of industry, seem to see work as something to avoid at all costs. Their land is just as fertile, if not more so, than the land across the river; the same lake stretches out before them, and the same river flows by their doors. It does seem hopeless that, with such a clear example constantly in view, they’re not inspired to take action. But maybe you’ll say you think you see some movement among the “dry bones.” True, my dear Bull, there is some movement now; but if you look closer, you’ll find it’s a Buffalo movement. It’s their energy, activity, and initiative that are constructing a railway to run across Canada to Goderich, which will allow them to save the entire length of Lake Erie and half of Lake Huron for transportation for all goods coming from Northern Michigan, Wisconsin, etc. The project is so driven by American enterprise that, even though the railway’s endpoint is in Waterloo, the name is disregarded, and because Buffalo’s initiative has pushed the project forward, it’s called the "Buffalo, Brentford, and Goderich Line." Honestly, John Bull, your colony looks pretty weak compared to this Buffalo effort. Let’s hope that increasing connections may bring some energy to them.

The train is starting for Niagara, and I am in it, endeavouring to recal the impressions of 1826, which, being but very dim, my anticipations partake of the charm of novelty. While in the middle of a seventh heaven of picturative fancy, the screeching of the break announces the journey's end. As I emerge from the motley group of fellow-passengers, a sound, as of very distant thunder heard through ears stuffed with cotton, is all that announces the neighbourhood of the giant cataract. A fly is speedily obtained, and off I start for the hotel on the Canadian side. Our drive took us along the eastern bank till we reached the suspension-bridge which spans the cliffs of the river. Across this gossamer causeway, vehicles are required to walk, under a heavy penalty for any breach of this rule. The vibration when walking is not very great; but, going at a quick pace, it would undoubtedly be considerable, and might eventually loosen those fastenings on which the aerial pathway depends. Arrived at the other side, I was quite taken aback on being stopped by an official. I found he was merely a pro formâ custom-house officer. Not having been schooled in the Old World, he showed none of the ferret, and in a few seconds I was again trotting southwards along the western bank to the Clifton House Hotel. The dull work of life is done, the cab is paid, my room is engaged, and there I am, on the balcony, alone, with the roaring of the cataract in my ears and the mighty cataract itself before my eyes.

The train is heading to Niagara, and I’m on it, trying to recall the impressions from 1826, which are pretty vague, so my expectations feel fresh and exciting. Just as I’m lost in a daydream, the screeching of the brakes signals the journey’s end. As I step out from the mixed crowd of fellow passengers, all I can hear is a sound like distant thunder muffled by cotton, signaling the presence of the massive waterfall. I quickly grab a cab and head for the hotel on the Canadian side. Our drive follows the eastern bank until we reach the suspension bridge that spans the cliffs over the river. Vehicles must walk across this delicate bridge, facing hefty fines if they don’t. The movement isn’t too intense when walking, but if you go too fast, it could seriously shake things up and ultimately loosen the cables holding the bridge up. Once I reach the other side, I’m caught off guard by an official. Turns out he’s just a pro formâ customs officer. Not being from the old country, he lacks the usual suspicion, and within moments I’m back on my way south along the western bank to the Clifton House Hotel. The mundane tasks of life are done, the cab fare is settled, my room is booked, and here I am, on the balcony, alone, with the roar of the waterfall in my ears and the magnificent sight of it right in front of me.

What were my first impressions?—That is a difficult question. Certainly, I did not share that feeling of disappointment which some people take pains to express. Such people, if they had dreamt that an unknown friend had left them 100,000l., would feel disappointed if he awoke and found a legacy of 90,000l. lying on their table; or, perhaps, they give expression to their feelings, by way of inducing the public to suppose that their fertile imaginations conceived something far grander than this most glorious work of Nature. If a man propose to go to Niagara for mere beauty, he had better stay at home and look at a lily through a microscope; if to hear a mighty noise, he had better go where the anchors are forged in Portsmouth dockyard; if to see a mighty struggle of waters, he had better take a cruise, on board a pilot-boat, in the Bay of Biscay, during an equinoctial gale; but, if he be content to see the most glorious cataract his Maker has placed upon our globe; if, in a stupendous work of Nature, he have a soul to recognise the Almighty Workman; and if, while gazing thereon, he can travel from Nature up to Nature's God; then, let him go to Niagara, in full assurance of enjoying one of the grandest and most solemnizing scenes that this earth affords. It wants but one qualification to be perfect and complete; that, it had originally when fresh from the hands of its Divine Maker; and of that man has rifled it—I mean solitude.—Palace hotels are very convenient things; energy and enterprise are very valuable qualities, and natural features of American character which I admire; but, seeing how universally everything is sacrificed to the useful and dollar-making, I dread to contemplate the future: for visions rise before me of the woodman's axe levelling the forest timber on Goat Island, which at present shrouds the town; and fancy pictures a line of villas, shops, and mills, ending in a huge hotel, at the edge of the cataract. I trust my vision may never be realized. But my hopes are small; for I invariably observed that, in clearing ground, scarce any attention had been paid to aught else but the best method of getting the best return for the labour bestowed.

What were my first impressions?—That’s a tough question. I definitely didn’t share the disappointment that some people are quick to express. These people, if they dreamed that an unknown friend had left them £100,000, would feel let down if they woke up to find £90,000 waiting for them on the table; or, maybe, they express their feelings to make the public believe their imaginations had envisioned something much grander than this amazing work of Nature. If someone plans to visit Niagara just for its beauty, they might as well stay at home and look at a lily under a microscope; if they want to hear a powerful noise, they should go where anchors are forged in Portsmouth dockyard; if it’s to see a turbulent clash of waters, they’d be better off taking a cruise on a pilot boat in the Bay of Biscay during a storm; but, if they’re content to witness the most beautiful waterfall that the Creator has placed on our planet; if, in this astounding work of Nature, they can recognize the Almighty Creator; and if, while staring at it, they can journey from Nature to Nature’s God, then they should definitely go to Niagara, sure that they’ll experience one of the most grand and awe-inspiring sights that this earth has to offer. It only needs one thing to be perfect; something it had originally when it was fresh from the hands of its Divine Maker; and that’s solitude. Palace hotels are quite convenient; energy and ambition are very admirable traits of American character that I respect; but, seeing how everything is sacrificed for utility and profit, I dread to think about the future: I can already picture the woodman’s axe cutting down the trees in the forest on Goat Island, which currently shields the town; and I imagine a row of villas, shops, and mills ending in a huge hotel at the edge of the waterfall. I hope my vision never comes true. But my hopes aren’t high; because I’ve constantly noticed that, in clearing land, hardly any attention is given to anything but the best way to achieve the highest return for the effort put in.

Now, reader, I have not told you as yet what my impressions were, as I stood on the balcony gazing at Niagara; and, I pray you take not offence, when I add that I have not the slightest intention of trying to record them. Writing frankly, as I feel, I have said enough for you to glean something of the turn they took, and to see that they were impressions which a pen is too feeble an agent adequately to express. I shall not tax your patience with Table Rock and Goat Island points of view, American and Canadian falls, the respective beauties of the Straight Line and the Horse-shoe; I do not purpose clothing you in Mackintosh, and dragging you with trembling steps along the slimy pathway between the Falls and the rock, to gaze on the sun through the roaring and rolling flood; nor will I draw upon your nerves by a detail of the hair-breadth escapes of Mr. Bumptious and Mrs. Positive, who, when they got half-way along the said path, were seized with panic, and only escaped a header into the boiling caldron by lying flat on their stomachs until the rest of the party had lionized the whole distance, when the guide returned and hauled them out by the heels, like drowned rats out of a sink-hole; nor will I ask you to walk five miles with me, to see the wooden hut, built over a sulphur spring within ten feet of the river, and which is lit by the sulphuretted hydrogen gas thereof, led through a simple tube.

Now, dear reader, I haven’t shared my thoughts yet about what it felt like to stand on the balcony looking at Niagara; and I hope you won’t take offense when I say that I have no intention of trying to describe them. To be honest, I’ve said enough for you to get a sense of what I experienced, and it’s clear that those impressions are beyond what words alone can express. I won’t bore you with the views from Table Rock and Goat Island, the American and Canadian falls, or the different charms of the Straight Line and the Horseshoe. I’m not going to dress you up in a raincoat and lead you nervously down the slippery path between the Falls and the rock, just to watch the sun shining through the thundering water; nor will I put you through the nerve-wracking details of Mr. Bumptious and Mrs. Positive, who panicked halfway along the path and barely avoided falling into the boiling waters by lying flat until the rest of the group made their way back, after which the guide pulled them out by their feet like drenched rats from a sinkhole; and I won’t ask you to walk five miles with me to see the wooden hut built over a sulfur spring just ten feet from the river, which is lit by the hydrogen sulfide gas from it, carried through a simple tube.

All these, and the rapids above, and the whirlpool below, and the four-and-a-half million horse-power of the Falls, have been so often described by abler pens and more fertile imaginations, that the effort would be a failure and the result a bore.

All of these, along with the rapids above, the whirlpool below, and the four-and-a-half million horsepower of the Falls, have been described so many times by more talented writers and more creative minds that any attempt to do so would likely fall flat and end up being boring.

I have in my possession a collection from the various albums at Niagara; it opens with the following lines by Lord Morpeth, now Earl of Carlisle—

I have a collection from the different albums at Niagara; it starts with the following lines by Lord Morpeth, now Earl of Carlisle—

"There's nothing amazing or bright, you glorious Fall!"

You may not recall to your imagination;

The stormy cloud, the flash of lightning,

The movement of the depths,

Earth's vibrant green and various colored dyes,

The fluffy whiteness of the sky,

The footsteps of armies growing louder as they approach,

The sound of cannon fire and drums,

The beauty of the face and the shape of grace,

The passion and skill of our people,

The song of Homer at its highest point,

The unstoppable flow of human power,

Britannia's trident on the blue sea,

America's youth shout for liberty!

Oh! may the waves that rage in your depths,

There they expend their anger, not climbing the surrounding slope,—

And until the conflict of your waves stops,

"The nations along your shores rest in peace!"

There are other effusions equally creditable to their authors; but there is also a mass of rubbish, from which I will only inflict two specimens. One, evidently from the pen of a Cockney; and the other, the poetical inspiration of a free and enlightened.

There are other pieces just as worthy of their writers; but there’s also a lot of junk, from which I’ll share just two examples. One is clearly written by a Cockney; and the other is the poetic inspiration of a free and enlightened thinker.

Cockney poet—

London poet—

"Being with Sarah is the greatest joy,"

Is that of seeing Niagara.

Free and enlightened—

Free and open-minded—

"Of all the roaring, pouring,"

Spraying streams that rush,

Niagara is the best,

All for an epic smash!

Not desiring to appear to as great disadvantage as either of the two last-quoted writers, I decline the attempt; and, while saving myself, spare the public.

Not wanting to look as bad as the last two writers I mentioned, I’m going to skip this attempt; and while I save myself, I’ll spare the public too.

I think, reader, that I have a claim upon your gratitude for not expatiating at greater length upon a theme from which it were easy to fill chapter upon chapter; for, if you are generous, you will throw a veil over the selfish reasons that have produced so happy a result. I will only add one piece of advice, which is, if the pleasure of visiting Niagara would be enhanced by a full larder and a ruck of people, go there "during the season;" but if your pleasure would be greater in visiting it when the hotel is empty, even though the larder be nearly in the same state, follow my example, and go later in the year, by which means you will partially obtain that quiet, without which, I freely confess, I never care to look upon "The Falls" again.

I think, reader, you should be grateful to me for not going on and on about a topic that could easily fill chapter after chapter. If you're feeling generous, you might overlook the selfish reasons behind this happy outcome. I'll just share one piece of advice: if you think the experience of visiting Niagara would be better with a stocked kitchen and a crowd of people, then go there "during the season." But if you'd enjoy it more when the hotel is less crowded, even if the kitchen isn't in the best shape, take my advice and go later in the year. That way, you'll get some of the peace and quiet that I honestly admit I need to enjoy "The Falls" again.

A formidable rival to this magnificent fall of water has-been discovered by that indefatigable traveller, Dr. Livingston. It is called the Mosiotunya Falls, which are thus described:—"They occur," we read ("Outlines of Dr. Livingston's Missionary Journeys," p. 19), "in the most southerly part of the Zambese. Although previously unvisited by any European, Dr. Livingston had often heard of these smoke-resounding falls, which, with points of striking difference from Niagara, are, if possible, more remarkable and not less sublime than that noble cataract. He was therefore anxious to inspect them, and on the 20th of November, 1855, he reached Kalai, a place eight miles west of the Falls. On arriving at the latter, he found that this natural phenomenon was caused by the sudden contraction, or rather compression, of the river, here about 1000 yards broad, which urges its ponderous mass through a narrow rent in the basaltic rock of not more than twenty-five yards, and down a deep cleft, but a little wider, into a basin or trough about thirty yards in diameter, lying at a depth of thirty-five yards. Into this narrow receptacle the vast river precipitated itself. When Dr. Livingston visited the spot, the Zambese flowed through its narrowest channel, and its waters were at their lowest. The effect, however, of its sudden contraction and fall was in the highest degree sublime, and, from the point at which he surveyed it, appalling. For, not satisfied with a distant view of the opening through its rocky barrier, and of the columns of vapour rushing up for 300 to 400 feet, forming a spreading cloud, and then falling in perpetual rain, he engaged a native, with nerves as strong as his own and expert in the management of the canoe, to paddle him down the river, here heaving, eddying, and fretting, as if reluctant to approach the gorge and hurl itself down the precipice to an islet immediately above the fall, and from one point of which he could look over its edge into the foaming caldron below, mark the mad whirl of its waters, and stand in the very focus of its vapoury columns and its deafening roar. But unique and magnificent as was the cataract when Dr. Livingston beheld it, the reports of others, and the inference drawn by himself, satisfied him that the spectacle was tame compared with what occurs during the rainy season, when the river flows between banks many miles apart, and still forces its augmented waters through the same fissure into the same trough. At these times the columns of spray may be seen, and the sound heard ten or twelve miles distant."

A powerful competitor to this stunning waterfall has been discovered by the tireless traveler, Dr. Livingston. It’s called the Mosiotunya Falls, which are described as follows:—"They occur," we read ("Outlines of Dr. Livingston's Missionary Journeys," p. 19), "in the southernmost part of the Zambezi. Although it had never been visited by any European before, Dr. Livingston had often heard about these smoke-resounding falls, which, while strikingly different from Niagara, are possibly even more remarkable and just as magnificent as that famous cascade. He was eager to see them, and on November 20, 1855, he arrived at Kalai, a location eight miles west of the Falls. When he got to the Falls, he found that this natural wonder was created by the sudden narrowing, or rather the compression, of the river, which is about 1000 yards wide here. It forces its massive flow through a narrow gap in the basalt rock that is only about twenty-five yards wide and then cascades down into a deep pit, slightly wider, that measures about thirty yards in diameter and is thirty-five yards deep. The vast river plunged into this narrow basin. When Dr. Livingston visited, the Zambezi was flowing through its narrowest channel, and its waters were at their lowest. However, the stunning effect of its sudden narrowing and plunge was profoundly impressive and, from his vantage point, quite terrifying. Unsatisfied with just viewing the opening in the rocky barrier from a distance, and the columns of vapor shooting up 300 to 400 feet, forming a spreading cloud that then fell like perpetual rain, he hired a local with nerves as strong as his own and skillful in handling the canoe to take him down the river, which was heaving, swirling, and churning as if reluctant to approach the gorge and hurl itself over the edge to a small island just above the fall. From one spot, he could look over the precipice into the frothy whirlpool below, witness the chaotic swirl of the waters, and stand right in the center of its vaporous columns and deafening roar. But as unique and magnificent as the waterfall was when Dr. Livingston saw it, the accounts from others, along with his own deductions, convinced him that the sight was mild compared to what occurs during the rainy season when the river flows between banks that are many miles apart and still pushes its increased waters through the same fissure into the same basin. During these times, the columns of spray can be seen, and the sound can be heard ten to twelve miles away."

My traps are all in the ferry-boat: I have crossed the river, been wound up the opposite bank, paid my fare, and am hissing away for Rochester. What thoughts does Rochester give rise to? If you are a commercial man, you will conjure up visions of activity and enterprise; if you are an inquirer into mysteries and manners, your dreams will be of "spirit-rapping and Bloomers." Coming fresh from Buffalo, I confess I was rather interested in the latter. But here I am at the place itself, and lodged in an hotel wonderfully handy to the station; and before the front door thereof railways are interlaced like the meshes of a fisherman's net. Having no conversable companion, I take to my ever faithful and silent friend, the fragrant cigar, and start for a stroll. There is a bookseller's shop at the corner; I almost invariably feel tempted to stop when passing a depôt for literature, especially in a strange place; but on the present occasion a Brobdignagian notice caught my eye, and gave me a queer sensation inside my waistcoat—"Awful smash among the Banks!" Below, in more Lilliputian characters, followed a list of names. I had just obtained notes of different banks for my travelling expenses, and I knew not how many thereof might belong to the bankrupt list before me; a short examination sufficed, and with a quieted mind, I continued my stroll and my cigar.

My bags are all on the ferry boat: I’ve crossed the river, climbed up the other bank, paid my fare, and I'm on my way to Rochester. What thoughts does Rochester bring to mind? If you’re a business person, you might think of bustling activity and opportunities; if you’re someone who likes to explore mysteries and social trends, images of "spirit-rapping and Bloomers" might fill your head. Coming straight from Buffalo, I have to admit I was quite interested in the latter. But now I’m at the location itself, staying in a hotel that’s conveniently close to the station; and in front of it, the railways intertwine like a fisherman’s net. Since I don’t have anyone to chat with, I turn to my reliable and quiet companion, the pleasant cigar, and set off for a walk. There’s a bookstore at the corner; I often feel tempted to stop when I see a place for literature, especially in a new city. But this time, a gigantic sign caught my eye and gave me a strange feeling in my chest—“Huge crash among the Banks!” Below, in much smaller letters, was a list of names. I had just gotten cash from various banks for my travel expenses, and I didn't know how many from the bankrupt list in front of me. A brief look was enough, and feeling relaxed, I continued my walk and enjoyed my cigar.

The progress of Rochester has not been so rapid as that of Buffalo; in 1826 they made a pretty fair start, and at present Rochester has only a little above forty thousand, while, as we said a few pages back, Buffalo has sixty thousand. Rochester has the disadvantage of not being built quite on the lake, as Buffalo may be said to be; moreover, the carrying on Lake Ontario is not so great as on Lake Erie. Both towns enjoy the rich advantages of the Erie canal, and Rochester is benefited by water-power in a way Buffalo is not. Genesee river, in a distance of three miles, falls nearly two hundred and thirty feet, and has three cascades, the greatest of which is upwards of one hundred feet; this power has not been overlooked by the Rochesterians, who have established enormous flour-mills in consequence, using up annually three million bushels of wheat. As one of the Genesee falls was close to the town, I bent my steps thither; the roads were more than ankle deep in mud, and I had some difficulty in getting to the spot; when there, the dreary nakedness of the banks and the matter-of-factism of a huge mill, chased even the very thought of beauty from my mind: whether man stripped the banks, or Nature, I cannot say, but I should rather "guess" it was man.

The growth of Rochester hasn't been as fast as Buffalo's; in 1826, they started off pretty well, but right now, Rochester has just over forty thousand residents, while, as we mentioned a few pages back, Buffalo has sixty thousand. Rochester has the disadvantage of not being located directly on the lake, unlike Buffalo; plus, the shipping on Lake Ontario isn’t as significant as on Lake Erie. Both cities benefit from the resources of the Erie Canal, and Rochester has the advantage of water power that Buffalo doesn't. The Genesee River drops nearly two hundred and thirty feet over a distance of three miles and has three waterfalls, the largest being over one hundred feet tall; the people of Rochester have taken full advantage of this, establishing massive flour mills that use three million bushels of wheat every year. Since one of the Genesee waterfalls is close to the town, I headed that way; the roads were muddy and more than ankle-deep, making it hard to reach the spot. When I finally got there, the bare, bleak banks and the mundane sight of a huge mill drove any notion of beauty from my mind: whether it was humans who stripped the banks or Nature, I can't say, but I would guess it was humans.

I was puddling back full of disappointment, and had just got upon the wooden pavement, which is a trottoir upon the plank-road system, when I saw a strange sail ahead, with rather a novel rig; could it be?—no! yes!--no! yes!--yes, by George! a real, living Rochester Bloomer was steering straight for me. She was walking arm-in-arm with a man who looked at a distance awfully dirty; upon closer examination, I found the effect was produced by his wearing all his face-hair close clipped, like a hunter's coat in the season: but I had but little time to spare upon him—the Bloomer was the star of attraction: on she came with a pretty face, dark hair, eyes to match, and a good figure; she wore a black beaver hat, low crown, and broad brim; round the hat was tied, in a large bow, a bright red ribbon: under a black silk polka, which fitted to perfection, she had a pair of chocolate-coloured pantaloons, hanging loosely and gathered in above the ankles, and a neat pair of little feet were cased in a sensible pair of boots, light, but at the same time substantial. A gap occurring in the trottoir, and the roads being shockingly muddy, I was curious to see how Bloomer faced the difficulty; it never seemed to give her a moment's thought: she went straight at it, and reached the opposite side with just as much ease as her companion.

I was walking back feeling really disappointed, and had just stepped onto the wooden pavement, which is a sidewalk on the plank-road system, when I spotted a strange sail ahead, with a pretty unusual design; could it be?—no! yes!—no! yes!—yes, by gosh! a real, living Rochester Bloomer was heading straight toward me. She was walking arm-in-arm with a guy who looked pretty dirty from a distance; but upon closer look, I realized it was just the result of him having all his facial hair closely trimmed, like a hunter's coat in season. But I didn't have much time to focus on him—the Bloomer was the main attraction: she approached with a pretty face, dark hair, matching eyes, and a good figure; she wore a black beaver hat with a low crown and a wide brim; tied around the hat in a large bow was a bright red ribbon: underneath a well-fitting black silk polka, she had on chocolate-colored pantaloons that hung loosely and were gathered above the ankles, and her neat little feet were in a sensible pair of boots that were light yet sturdy. When there was a gap in the sidewalk and the roads were shockingly muddy, I was curious to see how the Bloomer would handle it; it didn't seem to bother her at all: she went right for it and made it across to the other side just as easily as her companion.

Now, reader, let us change the scene and bring before you one with which you are probably not unfamiliar. Place—A muddy crossing near a parish school. Time—Play hours. Dramatis personae—An old lady and twenty school-boys. Scene—The old lady comes sailing along the footways, doing for nothing that for which sweepers are paid; arrived at the crossing, a cold shudder comes over her as she gazes in despair at the sea of mud she must traverse; behold now the frantic efforts she is making to gather up the endless mass of gown, petticoats, and auxiliaries with which custom and fashion have smothered her; her hands can scarcely grasp the puckers and the folds; at last she makes a start, exhibiting a beautifully filled pair of snow-white stockings; on she goes, the journey is half over; suddenly a score of urchin voices are heard in chorus, "Twig her legs, twig her legs." The irate dame turns round to reprove them by words, or wither them with a glance; but alas! in her indignation she raises a threatening hand, forgetful of the important duties it was fulfilling, and down go gown, petticoats, and auxiliaries in the filthy mire; the boys of course roar with delight—it's the jolliest fun they have had for many a day; the old lady gathers up her bundle in haste, and reaches the opposite side with a filthy dress and a furious temper. Let any mind, unwarped by prejudice and untrammelled by custom, decide whether the costume of the Rochester Bloomer or of the old lady be the more sensible.

Now, reader, let's switch the scene to something you're probably familiar with. Place—A muddy crossing near a local school. Time—Recess. Dramatis personae—An elderly woman and twenty schoolboys. Scene—The old woman walks along the path, doing the work of a street cleaner for free; when she reaches the crossing, she feels a chill as she stares in despair at the muddy mess she has to cross; look now at the frantic effort she is making to lift the heavy layers of her gown, petticoats, and other garments that fashion has piled on her; her hands can barely manage the gathers and folds; finally, she makes a move, showcasing a perfectly clean pair of white stockings; she moves forward, halfway there; suddenly, a chorus of young voices calls out, "Look at her legs, look at her legs." The angry lady turns to scold them with words or a fierce look; but in her anger, she raises a threatening hand, forgetting its important job, and down go her gown, petticoats, and extras into the filthy mud; the boys, of course, burst into laughter—it's the most fun they've had in days; the old woman hurriedly scoops up her clothes and makes it to the other side with a dirty dress and a furious mood. Let anyone with an open mind and free from bias decide which outfit—Rochester Bloomers or the old lady's attire—is more sensible.

I grant that I have placed before you the two extremes, and I should be as sorry to see my fair friends in "cut o' knee" kilts, as I now am to see them in "sweep-the-ground gowns," &c. "But," cries one, "you will aim a blow at female delicacy!" A blow, indeed! when all that female delicacy has to depend upon is the issue of a struggle between pants and petticoats, it will need no further blow: it is pure matter of fashion and custom. Do not girls wear a Bloomer constantly till they are fourteen or fifteen, then generally commence the longer dress? And what reason can be given but custom, which, in so many articles of dress, is ever changing? How long is it since the dressing of ladies' hair for Court was a work of such absurd labour and nicety, that but few artists were equal to the task, and, consequently, having to attend so many customers, ladies were often obliged to have their hair dressed the day before, and sit up all night that the coiffure might remain perfect? Or how long is it since ladies at Court used to move about like human balloons, with gowns hooped out to such an extent that it was a work of labour and dexterity to get in and out of a carriage; trains, &c., to match? Hundreds of people, now living, can not only remember these things, but can remember also the outcry with which the proposal of change was received. Delicacy, indeed! I should be glad to know what our worthy grandmammas would think of the delicacy of the present generation of ladies, could they but see them going about with nothing but an oyster-shell bonnet stuck at the back of their heads! Take another remnant of barbarism, handed down to us in the shape of powder. Masters have taken care of themselves, and got rid of the abomination; so have upper servants; but so wedded are some people to the habit, that they still continue to pay a poll-tax of 1l. 3s. 6d. for the pleasure of powdering and plastering their footmen's heads, as if they had just escaped from a flour-mill and passed a greasy hand over their hair: will any one deny, that the money spent in the tax would promote "John's" comfort and cleanliness much more, if expended in good baths, brown Windsor, and small-tooth combs.

I acknowledge that I've presented you with two extremes, and I would be just as unhappy to see my lovely friends in "cut-off knee" kilts as I am to see them in "ground-sweeping gowns," etc. "But," someone might exclaim, "you're going to attack female delicacy!" A blow, really? When all that female delicacy relies on is the outcome of a battle between pants and skirts, it needs no further strike; it's simply a matter of fashion and customs. Don't girls wear Bloomers consistently until they turn fourteen or fifteen, only to then generally start wearing longer dresses? And what reason can be provided other than custom, which is always changing in so many aspects of attire? How long ago was it that styling ladies' hair for court was such an absurdly laborious task that only a few artists could manage it, resulting in ladies often having to get their hair done a day in advance and staying up all night just to keep their hairstyles perfect? Or how long has it been since ladies at court moved around like human balloons, with their gowns so wide that it took considerable effort and skill to get in and out of a carriage, along with matching trains? Hundreds of people alive today can not only remember these things but also recall the uproar that greeted the suggestion of change. Delicacy, indeed! I'd love to know what our dear grandmothers would think of the delicacy of today's generation of women if they could see them wandering around with just an oyster-shell bonnet perched at the back of their heads! And let's consider another remnant of barbarism that we've inherited: powder. The masters have taken care of themselves and gotten rid of that awful stuff, as have the upper servants; yet some people are so attached to this habit that they still keep paying a poll tax of £1 3s 6d just for the thrill of powdering and plastering their footmen's heads, as if they just escaped from a flour mill and ran a greasy hand through their hair. Can anyone deny that the money spent on this tax would bring "John" much more comfort and cleanliness if it were spent on good baths, brown Windsor soap, and small-tooth combs?

Pardon me, reader, I feel that there is no analogy between a Bloomer and a small-tooth comb; it is from following out the principle of recording the reflections which what I saw gave rise to, that I have thus wandered back to the old country; with your permission, we are again at Rochester, and the Bloomer has gone out of sight round the corner.

Excuse me, reader, but I don't think there's any comparison between a Bloomer and a small-tooth comb. It's due to my principle of noting down the thoughts inspired by what I observed that I’ve ended up back in the old country. With your permission, we find ourselves back in Rochester, and the Bloomer has disappeared around the corner.

The shades of evening having closed in upon me, I retired to roost. My head was snugly bedded in my pillow; I was in that charmingly doubtful state in which thoughts and dreams have become imperceptibly blended. Suddenly there was a trumpet-blast, loud as a thunder-clap, followed by bells ringing as rapidly as those of the churches in Malta; as these died away, the hum of human voices and the tread of human feet along the passages followed, and then all was once more hushed in silence. I turned over, gave the clothes an extra jerk, and again sought the land of dreams. Vain and delusive hope!--trains seemed starting or arriving every half-hour, and the whole night was spent 'mid the soothing varieties of mineral trumpets and bells, and animal hoofs and tongues, till from sheer exhaustion, about five A.M., I dropped off into a snooze, which an early start rendered it necessary to cut short soon after seven.

As evening fell, I settled in for the night. My head was comfortably resting on my pillow; I was in that wonderfully unclear state where thoughts and dreams merge. Suddenly, a loud trumpet blast echoed, as sharp as a thunderclap, followed by bells ringing furiously like those in the churches of Malta. Once they faded, I could hear the murmur of voices and the sound of footsteps in the corridors, and then everything fell silent again. I turned over, gave my blankets an extra tug, and tried to drift off to sleep again. What a fool's hope! Trains seemed to be leaving or arriving every half hour, and the entire night was filled with the distracting sounds of horn blasts and bells, alongside the clatter of hooves and chatter, until sheer exhaustion finally made me doze off around five A.M., only to be woken up too soon after seven by the need for an early start.

Mem.—What a nice thing it is to put up at an hotel quite handy to a railway station.

Mem.—What a nice thing it is to stay at a hotel close to a train station.

Reader, you are doubtless aware that Rochester is on Lake Ontario, and a considerable distance from New York; but I must nevertheless beg you to transport yourself to the latter place, without going through the humdrum travelling routine of—stopped here, stopped there, ate here, ate there, which constituted the main features of my hasty journey thither, undertaken for the purpose of seeing my brother off, on his return to Europe, which duty bringing me within the yachting waters of New York, I think this a legitimate place for a chapter on the "Black Maria."

Reader, you probably know that Rochester is on Lake Ontario and quite far from New York. However, I still ask you to imagine yourself in New York without going through the tedious travel routine of stopping here and there, eating here and there, which was the main part of my quick trip there, made to see my brother off as he returned to Europe. Since this duty brought me to the yachting waters of New York, I believe this is a fitting spot for a chapter on the "Black Maria."


CHAPTER VII.

Construction and Destruction.




The "Black Maria" is a vessel so unique in every respect, that the most detailed description of her cannot but be most interesting to all yachting men; and, so far from apologizing for the length of my observations, I would rather crave indulgence for the scanty information which this chapter will afford; but as it must prove pre-eminently dull to those who are ignorant of such matters, I would entreat them to pass it over, lest, getting through the first page, their ideas become bewildered, and, voting me a bore, they throw down the book, subjoining a malediction upon my poor innocent head.

The "Black Maria" is a vessel so unique in every way that the most detailed description of her is sure to be interesting to all yachting enthusiasts. Instead of apologizing for the length of my observations, I’d rather ask for understanding regarding the limited information this chapter will provide. However, this will likely be really dull for those who aren’t familiar with these topics, so I encourage them to skip it. Otherwise, if they struggle through the first page, they might get confused, find me boring, and end up tossing the book aside with a curse directed at me.

The following notes were furnished me by Commodore Stevens and his brother, who were the designers and builders of this extraordinary yacht, and I therefore can vouch for their accuracy.

The following notes were provided to me by Commodore Stevens and his brother, who designed and built this remarkable yacht, so I can confirm their accuracy.

In case the term "centre-board" should be unknown to my reader, it may be as well to explain that it means a board passing longitudinally through the keel, above which a strong water-tight case is fixed for its reception; it is raised and lowered by hand or by machinery, according to its weight. The advantages proposed by the centre-board are—the stability it gives to the vessel on a wind when let down; the resistance it removes if, when running before the wind, it be raised; the small draught of water which the vessel requires, thereby enabling her to keep close in-shore out of the influence of strong tides, &c.; and, lastly, the facility for getting afloat again, by merely raising the centre-board, should she take the ground. To proceed with the notes:—

In case the term "centerboard" is unfamiliar to my reader, let me clarify that it refers to a board that runs longways through the keel, with a strong watertight casing attached for its housing; it can be raised and lowered by hand or machinery, depending on its weight. The benefits of the centerboard include the stability it provides to the vessel when it's downwind; the drag it eliminates when it's up when sailing downwind; the shallow draft the vessel needs, allowing it to stay close to shore away from strong tides; and finally, the ease of getting back afloat by simply raising the centerboard if it runs aground. Now, let's continue with the notes:—


THE CUTTER YACHT "BLACK MARIA."

THE CUTTER YACHT "BLACK MARIA."

Displacement, 145 tons.

Displacement: 145 tons.

Draught of water on straight keel, 5 feet 2 inches.

Draught of water on straight keel, 5 feet 2 inches.

Length of straight keel, 60 feet, then running away in a curving line upwards, till at the bow it draws 10 inches.

Length of straight keel is 60 feet, then curving up until it reaches the bow, where it draws 10 inches.

Length of centre-board, 24 feet.

Centre-board length: 24 feet.

Total depth of ditto, 15 feet; weight, 7 tons.

Total depth of the same, 15 feet; weight, 7 tons.

Foremost end of ditto, about 8 feet abaft the foremost end of straight keel.

Foremost end of the same, about 8 feet behind the foremost end of the straight keel.

When let down, it descends 10 feet at the further end, and 8 feet at the foremost. It is made of oak, with sufficient lead let in to make it sink. By an ingenious mechanical contrivance one man is enabled to raise and lower it with perfect facility.

When lowered, it drops 10 feet at the back end and 8 feet at the front. It's made of oak, with enough lead added to make it sink. Thanks to a clever mechanical device, one person can lift and lower it easily.

There is another centre-board abaft, about 10 feet from the stern, which is 8 feet long, with a total depth of 9 feet, and, when down, extending 5 feet below the keel.

There’s another centerboard at the back, about 10 feet from the stern, which is 8 feet long, with a total depth of 9 feet, and when it’s down, it extends 5 feet below the keel.

Length over all, 113 feet.

Overall length, 113 feet.

The extreme beam is 26-1/2 feet at 40 feet from the rudder-post running aft to about 19 feet at taffrail; forward, it decreases about 20 inches when abreast of mast, thence runs away sharp to about four feet at the bow.

The extreme width is 26.5 feet at 40 feet from the rudder post, tapering to about 19 feet at the taffrail. Moving forward, it narrows by about 20 inches when aligned with the mast, then sharply reduces to about 4 feet at the bow.

The mainmast is placed about 5 feet abaft the end of straight keel; it is 92 feet long, housing 8 feet: the diameter in the partners is 32 inches, tapering off to 23 inches at the hounds. The mast is made of white pine, the centre of it is bored out, for the lowest twenty feet about 12 inches diameter—the next 20 feet, 10 inches diameter—the next 20 feet, 8 inches, and the remainder 7 inches. This was done to make the mast lighter, and, by the circulation of air, enable it to season itself.

The mainmast is located about 5 feet behind the end of the straight keel; it is 92 feet long, with a housing of 8 feet. The diameter at the partners is 32 inches, tapering down to 23 inches at the hounds. The mast is made of white pine, and the center is hollowed out: for the lowest twenty feet, it has a diameter of about 12 inches; the next 20 feet, 10 inches; the following 20 feet, 8 inches; and the remainder is 7 inches. This was done to lighten the mast and allow air circulation for proper seasoning.

The main boom is 95 feet long[F] and made like a cask. The staves are 31 in number, of white pine, 2-1/4 inches thick; the staves are of different lengths, so as to vary the points at which they respectively abut. The extreme length of boom is obtained by two lengths of the staves; small cogs of wood are let in at intervals, half in one stave and half in its neighbour, so as to keep them from drawing, the whole bound together with strong hoops fitted with screws. The extreme diameter of the boom is 26 inches where the sheets are fixed, tapering off at the jaws, and 13 inches at the boom end. To give additional support to the boom, an iron outrigger, extending about 3 feet on each side thereof, is fixed where the boom-sheets are placed, and a strong iron brace extends from the jaws through the outrigger to the boom end. The gaff is of spruce, 61 feet long and 9 inches diameter.

The main boom is 95 feet long[F] and shaped like a barrel. It has 31 white pine staves, each 2-1/4 inches thick. The staves are different lengths to change where they meet. The full length of the boom is achieved by using two lengths of the staves; small wooden cogs are added at intervals, half in one stave and half in the next, to prevent them from pulling apart. The whole structure is held together with strong hoops that have screws. The widest part of the boom is 26 inches where the sheets are attached, tapering at the jaws to 13 inches at the end of the boom. To provide extra support, an iron outrigger extends about 3 feet on each side where the boom sheets are attached, and a strong iron brace runs from the jaws through the outrigger to the end of the boom. The gaff is made of spruce, measuring 61 feet long and 9 inches in diameter.

The bowsprit is of white pine, 38 feet long, 18 of which is outboard; the remainder comes under the deck, is let in to each beam, and abuts against the bitts: it is 24 inches diameter, and bored out like the mast, from 10 inches diameter at the heel to 7 at the end. The jibboom is made of two pieces of yellow pine, grooved out and hooped together; it is about 70 feet long and about 8 inches in diameter; the foot of the jib is laced to this spar on hooks (when required).

The bowsprit is made of white pine, 38 feet long, with 18 feet extending outboard; the rest goes under the deck, fitting into each beam and resting against the bitts. It has a diameter of 24 inches and is hollowed out like the mast, tapering from 10 inches at the heel to 7 inches at the end. The jibboom consists of two pieces of yellow pine, notched and strapped together; it is around 70 feet long and about 8 inches in diameter. The foot of the jib is attached to this spar with hooks (when needed).

The mainsail is made with the seams horizontal, to avoid the resistance perpendicular seams in so large a sail would offer to the wind. It has been calculated that the resistance of perpendicular seams, in a sail of this size, is equal to that of a plank 10 inches broad and 60 feet long, placed on end broadside to the wind; the luff of the sail is 66 feet; the foot, 93; the head, 50; the head and foot of the sail are laced to battens under gaff and on boom; the luff is brought to the mast by a contrivance as original as it is perfect; two battens are fixed on afterpart of the mast, about an inch and a half apart, the inner parts shod with iron, and rather broader than the exterior opening. To each eyelet-hole of the sail a strong brass-plate is fixed, having 4 rollers traversing fore and aft, and 2 transversely; these plates, as the sail goes up, are slipped into the grooves of the battens, the rollers preventing friction, and the battens keeping the luff fixed to the after centre line of the mast—without this ingenious arrangement the huge mast would, if on a wind, becalm at least three feet of the sail—three lazy-jacks are fitted to support the huge mass of canvas when lowering the sail.

The mainsail is designed with horizontal seams to minimize the resistance that perpendicular seams would create in such a large sail. It's been calculated that the resistance from perpendicular seams on a sail of this size is equivalent to that of a plank 10 inches wide and 60 feet long, standing upright against the wind. The luff of the sail is 66 feet; the foot is 93 feet; and the head is 50 feet. The head and foot of the sail are secured to battens under the gaff and on the boom. The luff attaches to the mast with a clever and effective mechanism: two battens are mounted on the back part of the mast, about an inch and a half apart, with the inner parts reinforced with iron and slightly wider than the outer opening. Each eyelet-hole of the sail has a sturdy brass plate with four rollers running lengthwise and two side-to-side. As the sail goes up, these plates slide into the grooves of the battens, with the rollers reducing friction, and the battens keeping the luff aligned with the mast’s center line. Without this smart setup, the large mast would catch at least three feet of the sail when going into the wind. Three lazy-jacks are also installed to support the heavy canvas when lowering the sail.

The jib is 69 feet in the hoist, and 70 in the foot.

The jib is 69 feet tall and 70 feet wide.

The bobstays are of solid iron, running 8 feet on each side of the keel, and going through a strong iron cap over the bowsprit end, where, a strong iron washer being put on, they are securely fixed with a nut.

The bobstays are made of solid iron, extending 8 feet on each side of the keel, and passing through a sturdy iron cap at the end of the bowsprit. A strong iron washer is placed on top, and they are tightly secured with a nut.

It will be seen that there is a slight discrepancy between some of the measurements which I have given, and those which are marked on the print; I place confidence in those I have received direct from the fountain-head; the difference is, however, so trifling, as scarce to need any notice. I regret omitting to obtain the length of the after-leech of the mainsail, and of the head of the jib; but I think the print, which I believe to be very accurate, would justify me in concluding that the former is about 110 feet and the latter about 120 feet.

It’s noticeable that there’s a slight difference between some of the measurements I’ve provided and those shown on the print. I trust the measurements I got directly from the source; however, the difference is so minor that it hardly needs mentioning. I regret not getting the length of the after-leech of the mainsail and the head of the jib, but I believe the print, which seems very accurate, supports my conclusion that the former is about 110 feet and the latter is about 120 feet.

THE BLACK MARIA.

THE BLACK MARIA.

THE BLACK MARIA.

THE BLACK MARIA.

Assuming those calculations to be correct—and they cannot be very far wrong—the mainsail would contain about 5790 square feet, and the jib about 2100 square feet. When it is remembered that the largest sail in the British Navy only contains 5480 square feet, some conception may be formed of their gigantic proportions.

Assuming those calculations are accurate—and they can't be too far off—the mainsail would be around 5790 square feet, and the jib about 2100 square feet. Considering that the largest sail in the British Navy is only 5480 square feet, you can get an idea of their massive size.

The gallant commodore was kind enough to trip his anchor and give me a short cruise. Unfortunately, there was scarcely a breath of wind; but even under the influence of such scanty propelling power, the way she shot through the water, like a dolphin in full cry, was perfectly marvellous; and the ease with which she came round, and the incredible distance she shot ahead in stays, was, if possible, more astonishing still; she steered as easy as a jolly-boat; or if, when running, a puff made her refractory, by dropping the after centre-board she became as docile as a lamb. My only regret was that I could not see her under the high pressure of a good snorter. Of course, any salt-water fish will have long since discovered that this wonderful yacht is a leviathan plaything, and totally unfit to withstand the most moderate gale, especially if any sea were running. What she might do if she were sparred, as other vessels of her tonnage usually are, I cannot pretend to say; but my yachting friends need never expect to see her, with her present rig, re-enacting the "America," hurling friendly defiance at the R.Y.C., and carrying off the crown of victory in their own waters.

The brave commodore was nice enough to raise his anchor and take me on a short trip. Unfortunately, there was barely any wind; but even with such limited power, the way she glided through the water, like a dolphin in full swim, was truly amazing. The way she turned and the incredible distance she covered during tacking was, if anything, even more surprising. She steered as easily as a small boat; and if a gust made her a bit difficult while running, dropping the back center-board made her as manageable as a lamb. My only regret was that I couldn't see her perform under the pressure of a strong wind. Of course, any sea creature will have long figured out that this incredible yacht is a massive toy, totally unfit to handle even a moderate gale, especially if there are waves. What she might accomplish if she were rigged like other ships of her size, I can’t say; but my yachting friends shouldn't expect to see her, with her current setup, recreating the "America," taunting the R.Y.C., and bringing home the win in their own waters.

But if any of my Cowes friends are anxious to test the powers of the "Maria," the gallant commodore will be happy to accommodate them, and—as he expressed it to me—will further rejoice at having an opportunity of returning some of the many hospitalities which made his short stay in England so agreeable to him. The only complaint I heard him make of the rules of the yachting at Cowes, was the want of some restriction as to vessels entering shallow water, by which omission a yacht with a light draught of water is enabled sometimes to draw ahead of her competitors by simply hugging the land out of the full swing of the tide, while others are forced, from their deeper draught of water, to struggle against its full force. As, in my humble opinion, the observation is a perfectly just one, I insert it here for the consideration of those whom it may concern.

But if any of my friends from Cowes want to test the capabilities of the "Maria," the brave commodore will be happy to help them, and—as he told me—will also be glad to have the chance to return some of the many kindnesses that made his brief stay in England so enjoyable. The only complaint I heard him make about the yachting rules at Cowes was the lack of restrictions on vessels entering shallow water, which allows a yacht with a shallow draft to occasionally pull ahead of its competitors simply by staying close to shore, avoiding the full force of the tide, while others with deeper drafts have to fight against it. Since I believe this observation is entirely valid, I’m including it here for those it may concern.

The accommodation on board is not nearly so good as in an English yacht, partly owing to the little height between decks, consequent upon her very small draught of water, and partly owing to the great space taken up by the case for the centre-board; besides which, it should be remembered that a yacht is not used as a home in America in the same way as in England. The great, and, I might almost say, the only quality, transatlantic yachtsmen care about is speed; and I think my yachting friends at Cowes must admit that they have proved that they know how to attain their end, and that Mr. Steers, the builder of the "America," is second to none in his craft; unless the "Black Maria" some future day assume a practicable rig, and, crossing the Atlantic, earn the victor's laurels, in which case Steers will have to yield the palm to the worthy fraternity, who are at one and the same time the owners, builders, and sailers of the subject of this chapter.

The accommodations on board aren’t nearly as nice as those on an English yacht, mostly because there’s limited headroom between decks due to her very shallow draft, and also because a lot of space is taken up by the centerboard case. Additionally, it’s important to note that yachts in America aren’t treated as homes in the same way they are in England. The main, and I might say almost the only, thing that transatlantic yacht owners care about is speed; and I believe my yachting friends at Cowes must agree that they’ve shown they know how to achieve that, and that Mr. Steers, the builder of the "America," is unmatched in his skills—unless the "Black Maria" someday adopts a practical rig and, crossing the Atlantic, earns the winner's accolades, in which case Steers will have to acknowledge the worthy group who are simultaneously the owners, builders, and sailors of the subject of this chapter.

I believe it is very generally considered that the wind-up of a day's sport is by no means the least enjoyable portion of the twenty-four hours, when it comes in the shape of good fellowship and good cheer; and upon the present occasion we had both alike undeniable of their kind. The commodore's cellar is as rich a rarity in its way as the Bernal collection, and, from the movement of the corks, I should imagine it was upon an equally large scale. I do not purpose inflicting a bill of fare upon you; but, having, in the foregoing pages, made a promise to furnish the proper recipe for Toddy and Chowder, I consider this the proper place to redeem that promise, under the guidance of my hospitable host, who initiated me fully into the mysteries of mixture, proportion, &c., by making both before me.

I think it's pretty widely agreed that wrapping up a day of fun is one of the most enjoyable parts of the twenty-four hours, especially when it involves good company and good vibes; and on this occasion, we had both in undeniable abundance. The commodore's wine cellar is just as rare and impressive in its own way as the Bernal collection, and from the movement of the corks, I'd guess it was just as extensive. I won’t bore you with a menu, but since I promised earlier to share the recipe for Toddy and Chowder, I believe this is the right time to keep that promise, thanks to my generous host, who fully introduced me to the art of mixing, measuring, etc., by making both right in front of me.

Whether it is of great importance to adhere exactly to the recipes, I cannot pretend to say; the soup was pronounced on all hands to be most excellent, and some of the knowing ones declared it was unusually good. We afterwards found out a good reason for its superior excellence. It appears that the commodore had given some instructions to the steward, which he evidently had not understood, for, upon asking that functionary towards the end of dinner for a bottle of fine old Madeira which had been kept back as a bonnebouche, he gave a wild stare-of astonishment, and said he had put it all into the chowder. This little addition, I can testify, most certainly did not spoil it. The toddy was not subject to any such unwarrantable addition; and, if I may judge from the quantity taken by my neighbours, they all found it as delicious a drink as I did myself.

Whether it's really important to follow the recipes exactly, I can't say for sure; everyone agreed the soup was excellent, and some of the experts claimed it was particularly good. Later, we discovered a good reason for its superior quality. It turns out the commodore had given the steward some instructions that he clearly didn't understand because, when I asked him towards the end of dinner for a bottle of fine old Madeira that had been set aside as a special treat, he looked shocked and said he had mixed it all into the chowder. I can attest that this little addition definitely didn't ruin it. The toddy didn't have any such odd additions, and judging by the amount my neighbors were drinking, they all enjoyed it as much as I did.

Recipes.

Recipes.

TODDY.—4 tumblers of water: 1 ditto, sugar: peel of 5 lemons, and dessert spoon of the juice: add a few pieces of peach and pine-apple, and some strawberries. Quarter of an hour before use, throw in 2 tumblers of old rum and a lump or two of block ice.

TODDY.—4 glasses of water: 1 glass of sugar: peel of 5 lemons, and a tablespoon of the juice: add a few pieces of peach and pineapple, and some strawberries. A quarter of an hour before serving, mix in 2 glasses of aged rum and a couple of ice cubes.

CHOWDER.—Saucepan ready, frizzle pork and onions till quite brown; put a layer at bottom of the saucepan—saucerful;—on that, a layer of mashed potatoes—soup-plateful;—on that, raw sea-bass,[G] cut in lumps 4 lbs.;—on that, pork and onions as before;—add half a nutmeg, spoonful of mace, spoonful of cloves, and double that quantity of thyme and summer savory; another layer of mashed potatoes, 3 or 4 Crackers,[H] half a bottle of ketchup, half a bottle of claret, a liberal pinch of black, and a small pinch of red pepper. Just cover this with boiling water, and put it on the fire till the fish is cooked.

CHOWDER.—Get your saucepan ready, fry pork and onions until they’re nice and brown; place a layer at the bottom of the saucepan—a saucerful;—then add a layer of mashed potatoes—a soup-plateful;—next, add raw sea-bass,[G] cut into chunks (4 lbs.);—then add the pork and onions again;—mix in half a nutmeg, a spoonful of mace, a spoonful of cloves, and double that amount of thyme and summer savory; add another layer of mashed potatoes, 3 or 4 crackers,[H] half a bottle of ketchup, half a bottle of claret, a generous pinch of black pepper, and a small pinch of red pepper. Just cover this with boiling water and put it on the stove until the fish is cooked.

The gallant commodore and his brother are now employed in building an iron bomb-proof floating battery, four hundred feet long, intended as a harbour defence. What guns she is destined to mount is a question which has not been definitively settled.

The brave commodore and his brother are currently working on constructing an iron bomb-proof floating battery, four hundred feet long, designed for harbor defense. The specific guns it will be equipped with is a question that hasn't been definitively decided yet.

In so large a community as that of New York, the supply of water forms a subject of the highest importance, especially when the rapid increase of the population is taken into account. Some conception of this extraordinary increase may be formed from the statistical fact that the city, which in the year of Independence contained only 35,000 inhabitants, has now 850,000, if the suburbs are included; nearly 4000 vessels enter the port annually, bearing merchandise valued at 25,500,000l., and bringing 300,000 emigrants, of whom one-third are Irish and one-third German. The tonnage of New York is upwards of a million, or equal to one-fourth of that of the whole Union: the business of the city gives employment to upwards of fifty banks. Religion is represented by 250 churches, of which 46 are Presbyterian, and 45 are Episcopalian. The Press sends forth 155 papers, of which 14 are published daily and 58 weekly.

In such a large community like New York, the water supply is incredibly important, especially considering the rapid population growth. You can get an idea of this remarkable increase from the statistic that the city, which had only 35,000 residents at the time of Independence, now has 850,000 if you include the suburbs. Nearly 4,000 ships come into the port every year, bringing merchandise worth £25,500,000 and about 300,000 immigrants, of whom one-third are Irish and one-third are German. The tonnage of New York exceeds a million, which is about a quarter of the total for the entire country. The city's economy provides jobs for over fifty banks. There are 250 churches representing various religions, with 46 being Presbyterian and 45 Episcopalian. The Press publishes 155 newspapers, including 14 daily and 58 weekly.

This short sketch will suffice to show that the city required a supply of water upon a gigantic scale. The difficulties were increased by the situation of the town, which is built upon the eastern extremity of an island—Manhattan—fourteen miles long and two broad, the highest point of which is but two hundred and thirty-eight feet above the level of the sea. Various plans for supplying water had been attempted without success, and the health of the population was suffering so much in consequence, that at last American energy, which here had been long dormant, rose like a giant refreshed and commenced that imperishable monument, the Croton aqueduct.[I]

This brief overview demonstrates that the city needed a massive supply of water. The challenges were made worse by the town's location, built on the eastern tip of Manhattan Island—fourteen miles long and two miles wide—where the highest point is just two hundred thirty-eight feet above sea level. Various attempts to provide water had failed, and the population's health was suffering significantly as a result. Finally, American determination, which had been dormant for a long time, awakened like a giant renewed and began the creation of the lasting monument, the Croton aqueduct.[I]

It is impossible to convey any idea of this stupendous work without figures; but I will endeavour to draw upon your patience as little as possible. My authority is a work published by Mr. Schramke in English, French, and German, and full of explanatory details and plans, &c. Mr. Schramke being one of the corps of engineers employed upon the work, I conclude his statements are peculiarly accurate. Long discussions, patient investigations, and careful surveys, combined to fix the position for commencing operations upon the Croton river, forty and a half miles from New York, and five miles below a small lake of the same name. All the preliminaries had been hitherto carried on under the superintendence of Major Douglas, professor of engineering at the Military Academy at West Point; but, owing to some disagreements, Mr. J.B. Jervis was the engineer eventually selected to carry out the undertaking. It is but just to mention his name, as the skill exhibited entitles him to lasting fame. By the construction of a substantial dam, the water was raised 40 feet, and a collecting reservoir formed, of 500,000,000 gallons, above the level that would allow the aqueduct to discharge 35,000,000 gallons a day. This stupendous work consists of a covered way seven feet broad and eight feet and a half high; in its course it has to pass through sixteen tunnellings, forming an aggregate of nearly 7000 feet; to cross the river Harlem by a bridge 1450 feet long and 114 feet above tide water, and to span various valleys. The receiving reservoir outside the town gives a water surface of 31 acres, and contains 150,000,000 gallons; it is divided into two separate compartments, so that either may be emptied for cleansing or repair. From this point the water is carried on, by three 36-inch pipes, to the distributing reservoir, which is 386 feet square and 42 feet deep, but filled generally to the depth of 38 feet, and then holding 21,000,000 gallons. From this point it radiates throughout the city by means of 134 miles of pipes, varying in size from 4 to 36 inches. There is an average fall of 14 inches in the mile; and the supply, if required, can be increased to 60,000,000 gallons daily. The total cost was 2,500,000l.; the revenue derived from it is 100,000l. a year, moderate-sized houses paying 2l., and others in proportion.

It’s impossible to describe this incredible project without numbers, but I’ll try to keep your patience intact. My source is a book by Mr. Schramke published in English, French, and German, full of explanations, plans, etc. Since Mr. Schramke was part of the engineering team working on the project, I believe his information is particularly reliable. Extensive discussions, thorough investigations, and careful surveys helped determine where to start operations on the Croton River, which is forty and a half miles from New York and five miles downstream from a small lake of the same name. Until now, all the preliminary work was overseen by Major Douglas, a professor of engineering at the Military Academy at West Point. However, due to some disagreements, Mr. J.B. Jervis was eventually chosen as the engineer to complete the project. It’s important to mention his name because his expertise deserves lasting recognition. With the construction of a strong dam, the water was raised 40 feet, creating a collecting reservoir of 500,000,000 gallons, high enough to allow the aqueduct to deliver 35,000,000 gallons a day. This massive project includes a covered pathway that is seven feet wide and eight and a half feet high; along its route, it goes through sixteen tunnels, totaling nearly 7000 feet, crosses the Harlem River with a bridge 1450 feet long and 114 feet above tidewater, and spans several valleys. The receiving reservoir outside the city has a water surface of 31 acres and holds 150,000,000 gallons; it is divided into two separate compartments so that one can be drained for cleaning or repairs. From here, water flows through three 36-inch pipes to the distributing reservoir, which is 386 feet square and 42 feet deep, typically filled to a depth of 38 feet, holding 21,000,000 gallons. From this point, it spreads throughout the city using 134 miles of pipes that vary in size from 4 to 36 inches. The average drop is 14 inches per mile, and the supply can be increased to 60,000,000 gallons daily if needed. The total cost was 2,500,000l; the revenue generated is 100,000l per year, with moderate-sized houses paying 2l and others paying proportionally.

PLAN OF THE CROTON AQUEDUCT.

PLAN OF THE CROTON AQUEDUCT.

In conclusion, I would observe that this grand work is entitled to notice from the skill displayed by the engineers, the quantity of the supply, and the quality of the article, which latter is nearly as good as sherry cobbler—not quite. If my reader has been inveigled into reading the foregoing details, and has got bored thereby, a gallon of Croton water is an admirable antidote; but, as that may not be available, I would suggest a cobbler, and another page or two; the latter upon the principle adopted by indiscreet drinkers, of "taking a hair of the dog that bit them."

In conclusion, I’d like to point out that this impressive work deserves attention because of the skill shown by the engineers, the amount of supply, and the quality of the product, which is almost as good as a sherry cobbler—not quite. If you've been lured into reading the previous details and found it tedious, a gallon of Croton water is a great remedy; but, since that may not be an option, I’d recommend a cobbler and another page or two; the latter based on the idea used by reckless drinkers of “taking a hair of the dog that bit them.”

The concluding passage of the last paragraph reminds me of a practice which, I have no doubt, the intense heat of a New York summer renders very advisable, if not absolutely necessary—viz., the canine auto-da-fé, which takes place in July. The heart sickens at the thought of the wholesale murder of "man's most faithful companion," and the feeling increases when you read that sometimes more than a thousand dogs fall victims to the law in one season; but that very fact is the strongest point which can be urged in its justifications for the dry hot atmosphere of the summer affords a ready stepping-stone to hydrophobia, and the larger the canine family, the greater the danger of that fearful and incurable disease.

The final part of the last paragraph reminds me of a practice that, without a doubt, the intense heat of a New York summer makes very advisable, if not completely necessary—namely, the canine auto-da-fé, which occurs in July. It’s disheartening to think about the mass killing of "man's best friend," and that feeling worsens when you read that sometimes over a thousand dogs are put down in one season. However, that very fact is the strongest argument in its defense, as the dry, hot conditions of summer create a perfect environment for rabies, and the larger the dog population, the greater the risk of that terrible and incurable disease.

Upon a certain day, the mayor of New York offers the usual reward of 2s. for every dog, which, having been found unmuzzled in the streets, is brought to the canine pound. However judicious this municipal regulation may be, it cannot fail to strike the reader as offering one most objectionable feature, in the golden harvest which it enables those astute rogues, the dog-stealers, to reap. Any one conversant with the irresistible nostrums possessed by those rascals, can readily understand what an extensive field is hereby opened up to them; and, if one can form a just opinion by comparing the number of dogs one habitually meets in the streets with the multitude that are reputed to fall victims under the official mandate, they certainly make the most of their opportunity.

On a certain day, the mayor of New York offers the usual reward of 2s for every dog that is found without a muzzle in the streets and brought to the pound. While this city regulation may seem reasonable, it undoubtedly has one very problematic aspect: it allows clever dog thieves to take full advantage of the situation. Anyone familiar with the tricks these thieves use can easily see how much opportunity they have now; and if you compare how many dogs you usually see on the streets with the countless number that are said to be taken as a result of this official rule, it's clear they are making the most of their chances.

To any admirer of the race, the inside of the pound must be a most painful and revolting spectacle: there may be seen, lying side by side, "dignity and impudence," the fearless bull and the timid spaniel, the bloated pug and the friendly Newfoundland, the woolly lap-dog and the whining cur; some growling in defiance, some whimpering in misery, some looking imploringly—their intelligent eyes challenging present sympathy on the ground of past fidelity—all, all in vain: the hour that summons the Mussulman to prayer, equally silently tolls their death-knell; yon glorious sun, setting in a flood of fire, lights them to their untimely grave; one ruthless hand holds the unconscious head, another with deadly aim smashes the skull and scatters the brain—man's faithful friend is a corpse.

To anyone who loves animals, the inside of the pound must be a painful and disgusting sight: you can see “dignity and cheek” lying side by side—the fearless bull and the timid spaniel, the bloated pug and the friendly Newfoundland, the fluffy lapdog and the whimpering mutt; some growling defiantly, some whining in misery, some looking up in desperation—their intelligent eyes silently asking for sympathy based on their past loyalty—all, all in vain: the hour that calls the faithful to prayer also marks their doom; that glorious sun, setting in a blaze of color, leads them to their early grave; one ruthless hand holds the unknowing head, while another with deadly precision shatters the skull and scatters the brain—man's loyal friend is now a lifeless body.

Owners are allowed to reclaim their property before sunset, on payment of the 2s. reward; the best-looking dogs are sometimes kept for two or three days, as purchasers are frequently found. The price, after the first day, is, the killer's fee and the food given, in addition to the original reward; altogether, it rarely exceeds 8s. The owner has to purchase like any other person. The bodies are all taken away to be boiled down for their fat, and the skins go to the tanners. Let us now turn from this disgusting subject to something more agreeable.

Owners can reclaim their property before sunset by paying the 2s reward. The best-looking dogs are sometimes kept for two or three days since buyers are often found. After the first day, the price includes the killer's fee and the food provided, along with the original reward; overall, it rarely goes over 8s. The owner has to buy back their dog just like anyone else. All the bodies are taken away to be boiled for fat, and the skins are sent to the tanners. Now let’s shift from this unpleasant topic to something more enjoyable.

I have already alluded to the great fancy Americans have for trotters. The best place to see "turns out" is the Bloomingdale road, which runs out of New York, nearly parallel with the Hudson, and separated from it only by the country villas, &c., built on the banks of that noble stream. This drive may be called a purely democratic "Rotten-row," as regards its being the favourite resort; but there the similarity ceases. To the one, people go to lounge, meet friends, and breathe fresh air on horseback; to the other, people go with a fixed determination to pass everybody, and on wheels. To the one, people go before dinner; to the other, after.

I’ve already mentioned how much Americans love their horses. The best place to see these “turnouts” is on Bloomingdale Road, which leaves New York and runs almost parallel to the Hudson River, separated only by the country houses built along its banks. This drive could be called a purely democratic “Rotten Row” since it’s such a popular spot, but that’s where the similarities end. People go to one to relax, catch up with friends, and enjoy fresh air on horseback; to the other, they go with the determined goal of passing everyone else, and they do it on wheels. People visit one before dinner and the other after.

A friend of mine having offered me a feed, and a seat behind a pair of three-minuters, the offer was too good to be refused. The operation of getting into one of these four-wheel waggons, looks perplexing enough, as the only rest for the feet, which appears, is the cap of the axle; but, upon pulling the horses' heads into the middle of the street, and thus locking the fore-wheels, a stop is discovered, which renders the process easy. It is difficult to say which is the more remarkable, the lightness of the waggon, or the lightness of the harness; either is sufficient to give a nervous feeling of insufficiency to a stranger who trusts himself to them for the first time; but experience proves both their sufficiency and their advantage. In due time, we reached the outer limits of the town; struggling competitors soon appeared, and, in spite of dust as plentiful as a plague of locusts, every challenge was accepted; a fair pass once made, the victor was satisfied, and resumed a more moderate pace. We had already given one or two the go-by, when we heard a clattering of hoofs close behind us, and the well-known cry, "G'lang." My friend let out his three-minuters, but ere they reached their speed, the foe was well on our bow, and there he kept, bidding us defiance. It is, doubtless, very exciting to drive at the rate of twenty miles an hour, and though the horses' hoofs throw more gravel down your throat in five minutes than would suffice a poultry-yard for a week, one does not think of it at the time.

A friend of mine offered me a ride and a seat behind a pair of fast horses, and it was an offer I couldn’t refuse. Getting into one of these four-wheeled wagons looks complicated since the only place for your feet seems to be the axle cap. However, once you pull the horses’ heads to the center of the street, locking the front wheels, you discover a stop that makes getting in much easier. It's hard to tell which is more impressive, the wagon's lightness or the harness's lightness; either one can make a newcomer feel uneasy when trusting them for the first time. But experience shows both are reliable and beneficial. Eventually, we reached the outskirts of town; competing horses soon appeared, and despite the thick dust everywhere, we accepted every challenge; after a fair pass, the winner was satisfied and slowed down. We had already overtaken one or two when we heard the sound of hooves clattering behind us and the familiar shout, "G'lang." My friend urged his horses faster, but before they could reach full speed, our opponent was right alongside us, taunting us. It’s definitely thrilling to drive at twenty miles an hour, and even though the horses’ hooves send more gravel flying into your throat in five minutes than a chicken coop would need in a week, you don’t think about it at the time.

On we flew; our foe on two wheels and single harness every now and then letting us get abreast of him, and then shooting ahead like an arrow from a bow. A few trials showed us the struggle was useless: we had to deal with a regular "pacer," and—as I have elsewhere remarked—their speed is greater than that of any fair trotter, although so fatiguing that they are unable to keep it up for any great distance; but as we had already turned the bottom of the car into a gravel-pit, we did not think it worth while to continue the amusement. The reason may be asked why these waggons have such low splashboards as to admit all the gravel? The reason is simple. Go-ahead is the great desideratum, and they are kept low to enable you to watch the horses' hind legs; by doing which, a knowing Jehu can discover when they are about to break into a gallop, and can handle "the ribands" accordingly.

On we went; our opponent on two wheels and a single harness occasionally letting us catch up, then darting ahead like an arrow from a bow. A few attempts made it clear the struggle was pointless: we were up against a true "pacer," and—as I’ve noted before—their speed surpasses that of any decent trotter, though it's so exhausting they can't maintain it for long distances. Since we had already turned the back of the carriage into a gravel pit, we decided it wasn’t worth continuing the game. You might wonder why these wagons have such low splashboards that let in all the gravel. The answer is straightforward. Speed is the main goal, and they’re kept low so that you can see the horses' hind legs; by doing this, an experienced driver can tell when they’re about to break into a gallop and can adjust the reins accordingly.

A tremendous storm brewing to windward, cut short our intended drive; and, putting the nags to their best pace, we barely succeeded in obtaining shelter ere it burst upon us; and such a pelter as it came down, who ever saw? It seemed as though the countless hosts of heaven had been mustered with barrels, not buckets, of water, and as they upset them on the poor devoted earth, a regular hurricane came to the rescue, and swept them eastward to the ocean. The sky, from time to time, was one blaze of sheet lightning, and during the intervals, forked flashes shot through the darkness like fiery serpents striking their prey. This storm, if short, was at all events magnificently grand, and we subsequently found it had been terribly destructive also; boats on the Hudson had been capsized and driven ashore, houses had been unroofed, and forest trees split like penny canes.

A huge storm brewing upwind cut our drive short, and pushing the horses to their fastest speed, we barely made it to shelter before it hit us. And what a downpour it was! It felt like the countless forces of nature had gathered with barrels, not buckets, of water, and when they tipped them over onto the earth, a fierce wind came in and blew it all eastward into the ocean. The sky lit up with flashes of sheet lightning, and between the bursts, sharp lightning struck through the darkness like fiery serpents attacking their prey. This storm, though brief, was impressively grand, and we later found out it had caused significant damage too; boats on the Hudson were capsized and washed ashore, roofs were torn off houses, and trees in the forest snapped like twigs.

The inn where we had taken shelter was fortunately not touched, nor were any of the trees which surrounded it. Beautifully situated on a high bank, sloping down to the Hudson, full of fine old timber; it had belonged to some English noble—I forget his name—in the old colonial times; now, it was a favourite baiting-place for the frequenters of the Bloomingdale road, and dispensed the most undeniably good republican drinks, cobblers, cock-tails, slings, and hail-storms, with other more substantial and excellent things to match. The storm being over, we unhitched the horses, and returned to town at a more sober pace; nor were we much troubled with dust during the drive home.

The inn where we had taken refuge was luckily untouched, and so were the trees around it. It was beautifully located on a high bank that sloped down to the Hudson, surrounded by impressive old trees. It had once belonged to an English noble—I can’t remember his name—from the colonial era; now, it was a popular stop for those traveling along the Bloomingdale road and offered some really good drinks like cobblers, cocktails, slings, and hail-storms, along with other substantial and excellent items to match. With the storm over, we unhitched the horses and headed back to town at a more relaxed pace; we also didn't have to deal with much dust during the drive home.

Lest the reader should get wearied with so long a stay at New York, I now propose to shift the scene for his amusement, and hope he will accompany me in my wanderings. If, during the operation, he occasionally finds me tedious in any details uninteresting to him, I trust that a judicious skipping of a few leaves will bring us again into agreeable companionship.

To avoid boring the reader with such an extended stay in New York, I now suggest changing the setting for a bit of fun, and I hope you'll join me in my travels. If, while I’m sharing my experiences, you occasionally find some parts tedious or uninteresting, I’m sure that skipping a few pages will soon bring us back to enjoyable company.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

The largest boom in the Navy is 72 feet long, and 16-1/2 inches in diameter; the largest mast is 127 feet 3 inches long, and 42 inches diameter; the largest yard is 111 feet long, and 26-1/2 inches diameter.


Turbot is a good substitute for sea-bass.


A small American biscuit made of best flour.


Vide sketch of Aqueduct.



CHAPTER VIII.

South and West.




Being anxious to visit the southern parts of this Empire State, and having found an agreeable companion, we fixed upon an early day in November for our start; and although I anticipated much pleasure from the scenery and places of interest which my proposed trip would carry me through, I could not blind myself to the sad fact, that the gorgeous mantle of autumn had fallen from the forest, and left in its stead the dreary nakedness of winter. The time I could allot to the journey was unfortunately so short, that, except of one or two of the leading places, I could not hope to have more than literally a flying sight, and should therefore be insensibly compelled to receive many impressions from the travelling society among which the Fates threw me.

Eager to explore the southern parts of this Empire State, and having found a pleasant travel buddy, we decided on an early November date to begin our journey. While I looked forward to enjoying the beautiful scenery and interesting places my trip would take me through, I couldn’t ignore the disappointing reality that the vibrant colors of autumn had faded from the forest, leaving behind the bleak bareness of winter. Unfortunately, the time I had for the journey was quite limited, so aside from one or two key locations, I could only expect to catch a quick glimpse and would inevitably be influenced by the fellow travelers around me.

Eight o'clock in the morning found us both at the Jersey ferry, where our tickets for Baltimore—both for man and luggage—were to be obtained. It was a pelting snow-storm, and the luggage-ticketing had to be performed al fresco, which, combined with the total want of order so prevalent in the railway establishments in this country, made it anything but an agreeable operation. Our individual tickets were obtained under shelter, but in an office of such Lilliputian dimensions, that the ordinary press of passengers made it like a theatrical squeeze on a Jenny Lind night; only with this lamentable difference—that the theatrical squeeze was a prelude to all that could charm the senses, whereas the ticket squeeze was, I knew but too well, the precursor of a day of most uncomfortable travelling.

At eight in the morning, we were both at the Jersey ferry, where we needed to get our tickets for Baltimore—both for ourselves and our luggage. It was snowing heavily, and we had to handle the luggage ticketing outside, which, combined with the total chaos that’s common at train stations in this country, made it anything but pleasant. We got our individual tickets inside, but the office was so tiny that the usual crowd of passengers turned it into a cramped scene like a rush for tickets on a busy Jenny Lind night; only with the unfortunate difference that the rush for tickets followed by delightful entertainment, whereas the ticket scramble was, as I knew all too well, the start of an uncomfortable day of travel.

Having our tickets, we crossed the ever-glorious Hudson, and, landing at Jersey City, had the pleasure of "puddling it up" through the snow to the railway carriages. There they were, with the red-hot stove and poisonous atmosphere, as usual; so my friend and I, selecting a cushionless "smoking-car," where the windows would at all events be open, seated ourselves on the hard boards of resignation, lit the tapery weed of consolation, and shrouded ourselves in its fragrant clouds. On we went, hissing through the snow-storm, till the waters of the Delaware brought us to a stand-still; then, changing to a steamer, we crossed the broad stream, on which to save time, they served dinner, and almost before it was ended we had reached Philadelphia, where 'busses were in waiting to take us to the railway. I may as well mention here, that one of the various ways in which the glorious liberty of the country shows itself, is the deliberate manner in which 'busses and stages stop in the middle of the muddiest roads, in the worst weather, so that you may get thoroughly well muddied and soaked in effecting your entry. Equality, I suppose, requires that if the coachman is to be wet and uncomfortable, the passengers should be brought as near as possible to the same state.

Having our tickets, we crossed the ever-glorious Hudson and, arriving in Jersey City, had the pleasure of trudging through the snow to the train cars. There they were, with the blazing stove and stuffy atmosphere, as usual; so my friend and I, choosing a cushionless "smoking car," where at least the windows would be open, settled ourselves on the hard wooden benches of resignation, lit our comforting cigars, and wrapped ourselves in its fragrant smoke. We traveled on, hissing through the snowstorm, until the waters of the Delaware made us stop; then, switching to a steamer, we crossed the wide river, where they served dinner to save time, and almost before we finished, we had reached Philadelphia, where buses were waiting to take us to the train station. I should mention that one of the many ways the great freedom of our country shows itself is the deliberate way buses and stages stop in the middle of the muddiest roads, in the worst weather, so you can get thoroughly muddy and soaked as you board. I guess equality means if the driver is going to be wet and uncomfortable, the passengers should be brought as close as possible to the same state.

The 'busses being all ready, off we started, and just reached the train in time; for, being a mail-train, it could not wait, though we had paid our fares all through to Baltimore. Soon after our departure, I heard two neighbours conversing between the intervals of the clouds of Virginia which they puffed assiduously. Says one, "I guess all the baggage is left behind." The friend, after a long draw at his weed, threw out a cloud sufficient to cover the rock of Gibraltar, and replied, with the most philosophical composure, "I guess it aint nurthin' else." My friend and I puffed vigorously, and looked inquiringly at each other, as much as to say, "Can our luggage be left behind?" Soon the conductor appeared to viser the tickets: he would solve our doubts.—"I say, conductor, is our luggage which came from New York, left behind?" "Ay, I guess it is, every stick of it; and if you had been ten minutes later, I guess you might have stayed with it; it'll come on to-night, and be at Baltimore to-morrow morning about half-past four; if you'll give me your tickets, and tell me what hotel you are going to, I'll have it sent up." Upon inquiry, we found this was a very common event, nor did anybody seem to think it a subject worth taking pains to have rectified, though the smallest amount of common sense and common arrangement might easily obviate it. And why this indifference? Because, first it would cost a few cents; secondly, it doesn't affect the majority, who travel with a small hand-bag only; thirdly, the railway across New Jersey is a monopoly, and therefore people must take that road or none; and lastly, from the observations I elicited in the course of examining my witnesses, it appeared to me that the jealousy and rivalry existing between New Jersey, New York, and Philadelphia, have some little effect; at all events, it is an ignoble affair that it is suffered to remain. I have, however, no doubt that time will remedy this, as I trust it will many of the other inconveniences and wants of arrangement which the whole railway system in this country is at present subject to.—To return from my digression.

The buses were ready, so we took off and barely made it to the train on time; since it was a mail train, it couldn’t wait, even though we had paid our fares all the way to Baltimore. Shortly after we left, I overheard two guys chatting between puffs of their Virginia cigarettes. One said, “I think all the baggage is left behind.” His friend, after taking a long drag, exhaled a cloud big enough to cover Gibraltar and replied calmly, “I guess it ain’t nothin’ else.” My friend and I puffed hard and exchanged worried looks, as if to ask, “Could our luggage really be left behind?” Soon, the conductor showed up to check the tickets and clear our worries. “Hey, conductor, is our luggage from New York left behind?” “Yeah, I think it is, every bit of it; and if you had been ten minutes later, you might have had to stay with it; it’ll come tonight and be in Baltimore tomorrow morning around half-past four. If you give me your tickets and tell me what hotel you’re going to, I’ll have it sent over.” Upon asking around, we found out this happened quite often, and hardly anyone seemed to think it was worth fixing, even though a bit of common sense and planning could easily prevent it. Why the indifference? First, it would cost a little; second, it doesn’t affect most people, who only travel with a small bag; third, the railway across New Jersey is a monopoly, so people have to take that route or none; and lastly, from what I gathered while talking to others, the rivalry between New Jersey, New York, and Philadelphia seems to play a part. At any rate, it’s shameful that this situation continues. However, I believe time will fix this, as I hope it will address many other inconveniences and organization issues the entire railway system in this country currently faces. —To get back to my point.

On we went, and soon crossed the Campbell-immortalized Susquehana. Whatever beauties there were, the elements effectually concealed; and after a day's journey, which, for aught we saw, might as well have been over the Shrap Falls, half-past six P.M. landed us in Baltimore, where we safely received our luggage the following morning.

On we went, and soon crossed the Campbell-immortalized Susquehanna. Whatever beauty there was, the elements completely hid it; and after a day's journey that, for all we saw, could have been over the Shrap Falls, we arrived in Baltimore at half-past six P.M., where we safely got our luggage the next morning.

A letter of introduction to a friend soon surrounded us with kindness in this hospitable city. My object in stopping here was merely to enjoy a little of the far-famed canvas-back duck shooting and eating, as I purposed revisiting these parts early in spring, when I should have more leisure. No sooner were our wishes known than one of our kind friends immediately offered to drive us down to Maxwell Point, which is part of a large property belonging to General Cadwallader, and is situated in one of the endless inlets with which Chesapeake Bay abounds. All being arranged, our friend appeared in a light waggon, with a pair of spicy trotters before it. The road out was dreary and uninteresting enough; but when we left it, and turned into a waggon way through an extensive forest, I could not but feel what a lovely ride or drive it must be in the more genial seasons of the year, when the freshness of spring and summer, or the richness of autumn, clothes the dense wood with its beauties. A short and pleasant drive brought us to a ferry, by which we crossed over to the famous Point, thereby avoiding the long round which we otherwise must have made. The waters were alive with duck in every direction; it reminded me forcibly of the Lake Menzaleh, near Damietta, the only place where I had ever before seen such a duckery.

A letter of introduction to a friend quickly surrounded us with warmth in this welcoming city. My reason for stopping here was simply to enjoy some of the legendary canvas-back duck hunting and dining, as I planned to revisit this area in early spring when I would have more free time. As soon as our wishes were known, one of our generous friends immediately offered to drive us down to Maxwell Point, which is part of a large property owned by General Cadwallader, located in one of the countless inlets that Chesapeake Bay has to offer. Once everything was arranged, our friend arrived in a light wagon, pulled by a pair of energetic horses. The road out was quite dull and unremarkable; however, once we left it and turned onto a wagon path through a vast forest, I couldn't help but think about how beautiful the ride would be in the warmer seasons, when the freshness of spring and summer or the richness of autumn adorns the dense woods with their splendor. A short and enjoyable drive brought us to a ferry, where we crossed over to the famous Point, avoiding the longer detour we otherwise would have taken. The waters were buzzing with ducks in every direction; it strongly reminded me of Lake Menzaleh near Damietta, the only place where I'd seen such a duck population before.

The sporting ground is part of a property belonging to General Cadwallader, and is leased to a club of gentlemen; they have built a very snug little shooting-box, where they leave their guns and matériel for sport, running down occasionally from Baltimore for a day or two, when opportunity offers, and enjoying themselves in true pic-nic style.[J] The real time for good sport is from the middle of October to the middle of November, and what produces the sport is, the ducks shifting their feeding-ground, in performing which operation they cross over this long point. As the season gets later, the birds do not shift their ground so frequently; and, moreover, getting scared by the eternal cannonade which is kept up, they fly very high when they do cross. The best times are daybreak and just before dark; but even then, if the weather is not favourable, they pass but scantily. My friend warned me of this, as the season for good sport was already passed, though only the nineteenth of November, and he did not wish me to be disappointed. We landed on the Point about half-past four P.M., and immediately prepared for mischief, though those who had been there during the day gave us little encouragement.

The sports ground is part of a property owned by General Cadwallader and is leased to a gentlemen's club. They've built a cozy little shooting lodge where they store their guns and sporting gear, dropping in from Baltimore for a day or two whenever they can, enjoying themselves in true picnic style.[J] The best time for good hunting is from mid-October to mid-November, when the ducks change their feeding spots, which brings them over this long point. As the season progresses, the birds don’t change locations as often, and when they do, they tend to fly high due to the constant shooting that scares them. The prime times for hunting are at dawn and just before dusk; however, even then, if the weather isn’t favorable, the ducks are few and far between. My friend warned me about this since the prime hunting season had already passed, even though it was only November 19th, and he didn’t want me to be disappointed. We arrived at the Point around 4:30 PM and immediately geared up for some action, although those who had been there earlier in the day didn’t offer much encouragement.

The modus operandi is very simply told. You dress yourself in the most invisible colours, and, armed with a huge duck-gun—double or single, as you like—you proceed to your post, which is termed here a "blind." It is a kind of box, about four feet high, with three sides and no top; a bench is fixed inside, on which to sit and place your loading gear. These blinds are fixed in the centre line of the long point, and about fifty yards apart. One side of the point they call "Bay," and the other "River." The sportsmen look out carefully from side to side, and the moment any ducks are seen in motion, the cry is given "bay" or "river," according to the side from which they are approaching. Each sportsman, the moment he "views the ducks," crouches down in his blind as much out of sight as possible, waiting till they are nearly overhead, then, rising with his murderous weapon, lets drive at them the moment they have passed. As they usually fly very high, their thick downy coating would turn any shots directed against them, on their approach. In this way, during a favourable day in the early part of the season, a mixed "file and platoon" firing of glorious coups de roi is kept up incessantly. We were very unfortunate that evening, as but few ducks were in motion, and those few passed at so great a height, that, although the large A.A. rattled against them from a ponderous Purdey which a friend had lent me, they declined coming down. I had only succeeded in getting one during my two hours' watching, when darkness forced me to beat a retreat.

The modus operandi is pretty straightforward. You wear the most inconspicuous colors, and, armed with a large duck gun—double or single, your choice—you head to your spot, known here as a "blind." It’s a kind of box, about four feet high, with three sides and no roof; there’s a bench inside to sit on and put your gear. These blinds are set up along the center line of the long point, about fifty yards apart. One side is called "Bay," and the other "River." The hunters scan carefully from side to side, and as soon as they see any ducks in motion, they shout "bay" or "river," depending on which side they’re coming from. Once a hunter "spots the ducks," he crouches down in his blind to stay hidden, waiting until the ducks are almost overhead, then stands up with his weapon and shoots as soon as they’ve passed. Since the ducks usually fly quite high, their thick downy feathers would deflect any shots aimed at them as they approach. This way, during a good day early in the season, there’s a constant barrage with a mixed "file and platoon" firing of glorious coups de roi. Unfortunately, we had a tough evening; very few ducks were flying, and those that did were so high that even though my heavy A.A. rattled against them from a hefty Purdey that a friend had lent me, they wouldn’t come down. I only managed to get one during my two hours of waiting before darkness forced me to head back.

But who shall presume to attempt a description of the luscious birds as they come in by pairs, "hot and hot?" A dozen of the members of the club are assembled; a hearty and hospitable welcome greets the stranger—a welcome so warm that he cannot feel he is a stranger; every face is radiant with health, every lip moist with appetite; an unmistakeable fragrance reaches the nostrils—no further summons to the festive scene is needed. The first and minor act of soup being over, the "smoking pair" come in, and are placed before the president. In goes the fork;—gracious! how the juice spouts out. The dry dish swims; one skilful dash with the knife on each side, the victim is severed in three parts, streaming with richness, and whetting the appetite to absolute greediness. But there is an old adage which says, "All is not gold that glitters." Can this be a deception? The first piece you put in your mouth, as it melts away on the palate, dissipates the thought, and you unhesitatingly pronounce it the most delicious morsel you ever tasted. In they come, hot and hot; and, like Oliver, you ask for more, but with better success. Your host, when he sees you flagging, urges, "one" more cut. You hesitate, thinking a couple of ducks a very fair allowance. He replies,—"'Pon my word, it's such light food; you can eat a dozen!" A jovial son of Aesculapius, on whom Father Time had set his mark, though he has left his conviviality in all the freshness of youth, is appealed to. He declares, positively, that he knows nothing so easy of digestion as a canvas-back duck; and he eats away jollily up to his assertion. How very catching it is!--each fresh arrival from the kitchen brings a fresh appetite to the party. "One down, t'other come on," is the order of the day. Those who read, may say "Gormandizer!" But many such, believe me, if placed behind three, or even four, of these luscious birds, cooked with the artistic accuracy of the Maxwell Point cuisine, would leave a cat but sorry pickings, especially when the bottle passes freely, and jovial friends cheer you on. Of course, I do not allude to such people as enjoy that "soaked oakum," called "bouilli." To offer a well-cooked canvas-back duck to them, would, indeed, be casting pearls before—something. Neither would it suit the fastidious taste of those who, not being able to discern the difference between juice and blood, cook all flavour and nourishment out of their meats, and luxuriate on the chippy substance which is left.—But time rolls on; cigars and toddy have followed; and, as we must be at our posts ere dawn, to Bedfordshire we go.

But who would dare to describe the delicious birds as they come in pairs, "hot and hot"? A dozen club members are gathered together; a warm and welcoming reception awaits the newcomer—a welcome so inviting that he feels right at home; everyone’s face shines with health, every lip glistens with appetite; an unmistakable aroma fills the air—no additional invitation to the feast is needed. Once the first course of soup is finished, the "smoking pair" arrive and are served to the president. In goes the fork—wow, how the juices burst out. The dry dish is swimming; with one careful slice on each side, the bird is divided into three juicy pieces, tempting you to eat even more. However, there's an old saying, "All that glitters is not gold." Could this be a trick? The first piece you take melts in your mouth, dispelling any doubts, and you confidently declare it to be the most delicious thing you've ever tasted. They keep coming, hot and hot; and like Oliver, you ask for more, but with better luck. Your host encourages you with, “just one more piece.” You pause, thinking that a couple of ducks is a decent amount. He replies, "Honestly, it’s such light food; you could eat a dozen!" A cheerful doctor, showing signs of age but still youthful in spirit, is consulted. He insists that he knows of nothing easier to digest than a canvas-back duck, and he continues to eat happily, proving his point. It's contagious—each new dish from the kitchen makes everyone hungrier. "One down, another coming on," is the vibe of the evening. Those who judge may say "Glutton!" But many, believe me, if seated in front of three or even four of these delicious birds, perfectly cooked in the style of the Maxwell Point cuisine, would leave barely a scrap behind, especially when drinks are flowing and friends are cheering you on. Of course, I’m not talking about those who enjoy that "soaked rags" they call "bouilli." To offer a well-cooked canvas-back duck to them would be like throwing pearls before—something. Nor would it satisfy the picky eaters who can’t tell the difference between juice and blood, cooking all flavor and nourishment out of their meals and only enjoying the bland remnants left over. But time passes; cigars and whiskey follow; and since we need to be at our posts before dawn, we head to Bedfordshire.

Ere the day had dawned, a hasty cup of coffee prepared us for the morning's sport; and, lighting the friendly weed, we groped our way to our respective blinds, full of hope and thirsting for blood. Alas! the Fates were not propitious; but few birds crossed, and those mostly out of range. However, I managed to bag half a dozen before I was summoned to nine o'clock breakfast, a meal at which, it is needless to say, the "glorious bird" was plentifully distributed. After breakfast, I amused myself with a telescope, watching the ducks diving and fighting for the wild celery which covers the bottom of these creeks and bays, and which is generally supposed to give the birds their rich and peculiar flavour. They know the powers of a duck-gun to a T; and, keeping beyond its range, they come as close as possible to feed, the water being, of course, shallower, and the celery more easily obtained. Our time being limited, we were reluctantly constrained to bid adieu to our kind and hospitable entertainers, of whose friendly welcome and good cheer I retain the most lively recollections.

Before the day broke, a quick cup of coffee got us ready for the morning's hunt; and, lighting up a friendly cigarette, we made our way to our blinds, full of hope and eager for a kill. Unfortunately, luck was not on our side; only a few birds flew by, and most were out of range. However, I managed to shoot half a dozen before I was called to the nine o'clock breakfast, a meal at which, needless to say, the "glorious bird" was in plentiful supply. After breakfast, I entertained myself with a telescope, watching the ducks diving and battling for the wild celery that grows on the bottoms of these creeks and bays, which is thought to give the birds their rich and unique flavor. They know exactly how a duck-gun works; staying just outside its range, they get as close as they can to feed, since the water is shallower there and the celery is easier to grab. With our time limited, we were sadly forced to say goodbye to our kind and hospitable hosts, whose warm welcome and great hospitality I remember vividly.

Crossing the bay in a small boat, we re-entered the light carriage, and were soon "tooling away" merrily to Baltimore. On the road, our friend amused us with accounts of two different methods adopted in these waters for getting ducks for the pot. One method is, to find a bay where the ducks are plentiful, and tolerably near the shore; and then, concealing yourself as near the water's edge as possible, you take a stick, on the end of which you tie a handkerchief, and keep waving it steadily backwards and forwards. The other method is to employ a dog in lieu of the stick and handkerchief. They have a regular breed for the purpose, about the size of a large Skye terrier, and of a sandy colour. You keep throwing pebbles to the water's edge, which the dog follows; and thus he is ever running to and fro. In either case, the ducks, having something of the woman in their composition, gradually swim in, to ascertain the meaning or cause of these mysterious movements; and, once arrived within range, the sportsman rises suddenly, and, as the scared birds get on the wing, they receive the penalty of their curiosity in a murderous discharge. These two methods they call "tolling;" and most effectual they prove for supplying the market.

Crossing the bay in a small boat, we got back into the light carriage and soon set off happily toward Baltimore. On the way, our friend entertained us with stories about two different ways people catch ducks around these waters for dinner. One way is to find a spot in the bay where ducks are abundant and relatively close to the shore. Then, by hiding as close to the water's edge as possible, you take a stick with a handkerchief tied to the end and wave it steadily back and forth. The other method is to use a dog instead of the stick and handkerchief. They have a specific breed for this, about the size of a large Skye terrier, and sandy-colored. You throw pebbles to the water's edge for the dog to chase, so he keeps running back and forth. In either case, the ducks, showing a bit of curiosity, gradually swim in to check out these mysterious movements. Once they come within range, the hunter suddenly stands up, and as the startled birds take flight, they pay for their curiosity with a deadly shot. These two techniques are called "tolling," and they prove very effective for supplying the market.

Different nations exhibit different methods of ingenuity for the capture of game, &c. I remember being struck, when in Egypt, with the artful plan employed for catching ducks and flamingos, on Lake Menzaleh; which is, for the huntsman to put a gourd on his head, pierced sufficiently to see through, and by means of which,—the rest of his body being thoroughly immersed in water,—he approaches his game so easily, that the first notice they have thereof is the unpleasant sensation they experience as his hand closes upon their legs in the depths of the water.

Different countries have unique ways of inventiveness when it comes to hunting game, etc. I recall being impressed, when I was in Egypt, by the clever technique used to catch ducks and flamingos on Lake Menzaleh. The hunter wears a gourd on his head, which is pierced enough to see through, and with his body mostly submerged in water, he can sneak up on the birds so quietly that the first indication they have of his presence is the unpleasant feeling of his hand grabbing their legs underwater.

Of the town, &c., of Baltimore, I hope to tell you something more on my return. We will therefore proceed at once to the railway station, and take our places for Pittsburg. It is a drizzly, snowy morning, a kind of moisture that laughs at so-called waterproofs, and would penetrate an air-pump. As there was no smoking-car, we were constrained to enter another; and off we started. At first, the atmosphere was bearable; but soon, alas! too soon, every window was closed; the stove glowed red-hot; the tough-hided natives gathered round it, and, deluging it with expectorated showers of real Virginian juice, the hissing and stench became insufferable. I had no resource but to open my window, and let the driving sleet drench one side of me, while the other was baking; thus, one cheek was in an ice-house, and the other in an oven. At noon we came to "a fix;" the railway bridge across to Harrisburg had broken down. There was nothing for it but patience; and, in due time, it was rewarded by the arrival of three omnibuses and a luggage-van. As there were about eighty people in the train, it became a difficult task to know how to pack, for the same wretched weather continued, and nobody courted an outside place, with drenched clothes wherein to continue the journey. At last, however, it was managed, something on the herrings-in-a-barrel principle. I had one lady in my lap, and a darling unwashed pledge of her affection on each foot. We counted twenty-six heads, in all; and we jolted away, as fast as the snow would let us, to catch the Philadelphia train, which was to pick us up here.

Of the town of Baltimore, I hope to share more with you upon my return. So, let's head straight to the train station and get our tickets for Pittsburgh. It’s a drizzly, snowy morning, that kind of wet that laughs at so-called waterproofs and could get through an air-pump. Since there was no smoking car, we had to go into a different one, and off we went. At first, the atmosphere was tolerable, but soon enough, every window was shut; the stove was glowing red-hot; the tough locals gathered around it, and by spitting out their real Virginian juice, the hissing and smell became unbearable. I had no choice but to open my window, letting the icy sleet drench one side of me while the other side was roasting; one cheek was in a freezer, and the other was in an oven. By noon, we hit a snag—the railway bridge to Harrisburg had collapsed. We had no option but to be patient, and eventually, three buses and a luggage van showed up. With about eighty people on the train, figuring out how to pack became complicated, as the awful weather continued, and no one wanted to sit outside in soaked clothes for the rest of the ride. Eventually, it was sorted out, something like packing herrings in a barrel. I had one lady in my lap and a lovely unwashed reminder of her affection on each foot. We counted twenty-six heads in total and bumped along as fast as the snow would allow us, trying to catch the Philadelphia train, which was supposed to pick us up here.

We managed to arrive about an hour and a half after it had passed; and, therefore, no alternative remained but to adjourn to the little inn, and fortify ourselves for the trial with such good things as mine host of the "Culverley" could produce. It had now settled down to a regular fall of snow, and we began to feel anxious about the chances of proceeding.

We got there about an hour and a half after it was over; so, we had no choice but to head to the little inn and prepare ourselves for the challenge with whatever tasty food the owner of the "Culverley" could offer. By then, it had started to snow consistently, and we began to worry about our chances of moving forward.

Harrisburg may be very pretty and interesting in fine weather, but it was a desolately dreary place to anticipate being snowed-up at in winter, although situated on the banks of the lovely Susquehana: accordingly, I asked mine host when the next train would pass. He replied, with grammatical accuracy, "It should pass about four to-morrow morning; but when it will I am puzzled to say.—What's your opinion, Colonel?" he added; and, turning round, I observed the distinguished military authority seated on one chair, and his legs gracefully pendent over the back of another. In his sword-hand, he wielded a small clasp-knife, which did the alternate duty of a toothpick and a whittler,[K] for which latter amusement he kept a small stick in his left hand to operate upon; and the floor bore testimony to his untiring zeal. When the important question was propounded to him, he ceased from his whittling labours, and, burying the blade deep between his ivories, looked out of the window with an authoritative air, apparently endeavouring, first, to ascertain what depth of snow was on the ground, and then, by an upward glance, to calculate how much more was likely to follow. Having duly weighed these points, and having perfected the channel between his ivories, he sucked the friendly blade, and replied, with a stoical indifference—which, considering my anxiety, might almost be styled heartless—"I guess, if it goes on snowing like this, you'll have no cars here to-morrow at all." Then, craning up to the heavens, as if seeking for the confirmation of a more terrible prophecy, he added, "By the looks of it, I think the gem'men may be fixed here for a week." Having delivered himself of the foregoing consolatory observation, and duly discharged a shower of Virginia juice on the floor, the military authority resumed his whittling labours with increased vigour. His occupation involuntarily carried my mind across the water to a country-house, where I had so often seen an old blind friend amusing himself, by tearing up paper into small pieces, to make pillows for the poor. If the gallant Colonel would only substitute this occupation for whittling, what good might he not do in Harrisburg!

Harrisburg might be really nice and interesting in good weather, but it was a depressingly gloomy place to expect to be stuck in with snow during winter, even though it was located by the beautiful Susquehanna River. So, I asked the host when the next train would come. He replied, accurately, "It should come around four tomorrow morning; but I can’t say for sure when it will." He then asked, "What do you think, Colonel?" Turning around, I saw the distinguished military figure perched on one chair, his legs dangling elegantly over the back of another. In his sword hand, he held a small pocket knife, which served as both a toothpick and a whittler, for which he kept a small stick in his left hand to work on; the floor showed proof of his tireless enthusiasm. When the important question was posed to him, he paused his whittling, buried the blade deep between his teeth, and looked out the window with an air of authority, seemingly trying to figure out how much snow was on the ground, and then glancing up to estimate how much more might come. After considering these factors, and having mastered the art of cleaning his teeth, he sucked the friendly blade and replied, with a stoic indifference that, given my anxiety, could almost be called heartless, "I guess if it keeps snowing like this, you won’t have any trains here tomorrow at all." Then, craning his neck to the sky as if looking for confirmation of a worse prophecy, he added, "By the looks of it, I think the gentlemen might be stuck here for a week." After making this comforting observation and spitting a stream of Virginia juice on the floor, the military man went back to his whittling with renewed energy. His activity involuntarily reminded me of a country house across the water, where I had often seen an old blind friend passing the time tearing up paper into small pieces to make pillows for the needy. If only the gallant Colonel would swap this whittling for that task, think of the good he could do in Harrisburg!

I am happy to say that my Job's comforter turned out a false prophet; snow soon gave place to sleet, and sleet to rain, and before midnight the muck was complete. Next morning, at three, we got into the 'bus, and soon after four the cars came in, and we found ourselves once more en route for Pittsburg. I think this was about the most disagreeable day's journey I ever had. The mixture of human and metallic heat, the chorus of infantine squallers—who kept responding to one another from all parts of the car, like so many dogs in an eastern city—and the intervals filled up by the hissing on the stove of the Virginia juice, were unpleasant enough; but even the elements combined against us. The rain and the snow were fighting together, and producing that slushiness of atmosphere which obscures all scenery; added to which, the unfortunate foreknowledge that we were doomed to fifteen or sixteen hours of these combinations of misery, made it indeed a wretched day. My only resource was to open a window, which the moment I attempted, a hulking fellow, swaddled up in coats and comforters, and bursting with health, begged it might be closed as "It was so cold:" the thermometer, I am sure, was ranging, within the car, from ninety to a hundred degrees. He then tried to hector and bully, and finding that of no use, he appealed to the guard. I claimed my right, and further pleaded the necessity of fresh air, not merely for comfort, but for very life. As my friend expressed the same sentiments, the cantankerous Hector was left to sulk; and I must own to a malicious satisfaction, when, soon after, two ladies came in, and seating themselves on the bench abreast of mine, opened their window, and placed Hector in a thorough draught, which, while gall and wormwood to him, was balm of Gilead to me. As I freely criticise American habits, &c., during my travels, it is but just I should state, that Hector was the only one of his countrymen I ever met who was wilfully offensive and seemed to wish to insult.

I’m happy to say that my comforter turned out to be a false prophet; snow quickly turned to sleet, and sleet to rain, and by midnight, the mess was complete. The next morning, at three, we got on the bus, and shortly after four, the trains arrived, and we found ourselves once more en route for Pittsburgh. I think this was one of the most unpleasant travel days I’ve ever experienced. The mix of human and metal heat, the chorus of crying babies—who kept responding to each other from all parts of the car, like so many dogs in an eastern city—and the intervals filled with the hissing from the stove of the Virginia juice were bad enough; but even the weather was against us. The rain and snow were battling each other, creating that dampness that obscures all scenery; on top of that, the unfortunate knowledge that we were doomed to fifteen or sixteen hours of this misery made it truly a miserable day. My only relief was to open a window, but the moment I tried, a large guy, wrapped up in coats and blankets and brimming with health, asked me to close it because "It was so cold." I’m sure the temperature inside the car was ranging from ninety to a hundred degrees. He then tried to bully me, and finding that didn’t work, he called over the guard. I asserted my right to fresh air, not just for comfort, but for my very life. Since my friend agreed with me, the grumpy guy was left to sulk; and I felt a bit of satisfaction when, shortly after, two ladies came in, sat down on the bench next to mine, opened their window, and put the grumpy guy in a full draft, which, while it was torture for him, was a relief for me. As I often criticize American habits, etc., during my travels, I should note that this guy was the only one from his country I ever met who was intentionally rude and seemed to want to insult.

The engineering on this road was so contrived, that we had to go through an operation, which to me was quite novel—viz., being dragged by wire ropes up one of the Alleghany hills, and eased down the other side. The extreme height is sixteen hundred feet; and it is accomplished by five different stationary engines, each placed on a separate inclined plane, the highest of which is two thousand six hundred feet above the level of the sea. The want of proper arrangement and sufficient hands made this a most dilatory and tedious operation. Upon asking why so 'cute and go-ahead a people had tolerated such bad engineering originally, and such dilatory arrangements up to the present hour, I was answered, "Oh, sir, that's easily explained; it is a government road and a monopoly, but another road is nearly completed, by which all this will be avoided; and, as it is in the hands of a company, there will be no delay then."—How curious it is, the way governments mess such things when they undertake them! I could not help thinking of the difference between our own government mails from Marseilles to Malta, &c., and the glorious steamers of the Peninsular and Oriental Company, that carry on the same mails from Malta.—But to return from my digression.

The engineering on this road was so poorly designed that we had to go through an experience that was quite new to me—being pulled by wire ropes up one of the Alleghany hills and then eased down the other side. The highest point is sixteen hundred feet, and this is achieved by five different stationary engines, each on a separate inclined plane, the highest of which is two thousand six hundred feet above sea level. The lack of proper planning and enough workers made this a very slow and frustrating process. When I asked why such a clever and forward-thinking group of people had put up with such bad engineering in the first place and such slow operations until now, I was told, "Oh, sir, that's easy to explain; it's a government road and a monopoly, but another road is almost finished that will avoid all of this, and since it's managed by a company, there will be no delays then."—How strange it is how governments mess things up when they take charge! I couldn't help thinking about the difference between our own government-run mail system from Marseilles to Malta, etc., and the amazing steamers of the Peninsular and Oriental Company that handle the same mail from Malta.—But let me get back to my main point.

I was astonished to see a thing like a piece of a canal-boat descending one of these inclined planes on a truck; nor was my astonishment diminished when I found that it really was part of a canal-boat, and that the remaining portions were following in the rear. The boats are made, some in three, some in five compartments; and, being merely forelocked together, are easily carried across the hill, from the canal on one side to the continuation thereof on the other.[L]

I was amazed to see something like a piece of a canal boat going down one of these ramps on a truck; my surprise only grew when I realized it was actually part of a canal boat, and the rest of it was coming behind. The boats are built in either three or five sections; and since they’re just loosely connected, they can easily be transported across the hill, from the canal on one side to the next section on the other.[L]


A few hours after quitting these planes, we came to the end of the railway, and had to coach it over a ten-mile break in the line. It was one of those wretched wet days which is said to make even an old inhabitant of Argyleshire look despondingly,—in which county, it will be remembered that, after six weeks' incessant wet, an English traveller, on asking a shepherd boy whether it always rained there, received the consoling reply of, "No, sir—it sometimes snaws." The ground was from eight to eighteen inches deep in filthy mud; the old nine-inside stages—of which more anon—were waiting ready; and as there were several ladies in the cars, I thought the stages might be induced to draw up close to the scantily-covered platform to take up the passengers; but no such idea entered their heads. I imagine such an indication of civilization would have been at variance with their republican notions of liberty; and the fair ones had no alternative but to pull their garments up to the altitude of those of a ballet-dancer, and to bury their neat feet and well-turned ankles deep, deep, deep in the filthy mire. But what made this conduct irresistibly ludicrous—though painful to any gentleman to witness—was the mockery of make-believe gallantry exhibited, in seating all the ladies before any gentleman was allowed to enter; the upshot of which was, that they gradually created a comparatively beaten path for the gentlemen to get in by. One pull of the rein and one grain of manners would have enabled everybody to enter clean and dry; yet so habituated do the better classes appear to have become to this phase of democracy, that no one remonstrated on behalf of the ladies or himself.

A few hours after leaving those planes, we reached the end of the railway and had to take a coach over a ten-mile gap in the line. It was one of those miserable rainy days that could make even a long-time resident of Argyleshire feel down. In that county, it’s remembered that after six weeks of nonstop rain, an English traveler asked a shepherd boy if it always rained there, and the boy cheerfully replied, "No, sir—it sometimes snows." The ground was covered in filthy mud, anywhere from eight to eighteen inches deep; the old nine-inside stages—more on that later—were ready and waiting. I thought the stages might position themselves close to the sparsely covered platform to pick up the passengers since there were several ladies in the cars, but that thought didn’t even cross their minds. I guess that kind of gesture would clash with their republican ideas of freedom; the ladies had no choice but to pull their skirts up like ballet dancers and sink their stylish feet and well-shaped ankles deep, deep, deep into the muck. What made this situation hilariously absurd—though painful for any gentleman to witness—was the false gallantry shown by seating all the ladies before any gentleman was allowed to board. The result was that they gradually created a sort of beaten path for the gentlemen to get in. Just one tug on the reins and a touch of common courtesy would have let everyone enter clean and dry; yet the upper classes seemed so accustomed to this form of democracy that no one spoke up for the ladies or themselves.

The packing completed, a jolting ride brought us again to the railway cars; and in a few hours more—amid the cries of famishing babes and sleepy children, the "hush-hushes" of affectionate mammas, the bustle of gathering packages, and the expiring heat of the poisonous stove—we reached the young Birmingham of America about 10 P.M., and soon found rest in a comfortable bed, at a comfortable hotel.

The packing done, a bumpy ride took us back to the train cars; and after a few more hours—filled with the cries of hungry babies and sleepy kids, the soothing words of caring moms, the hustle of collecting bags, and the fading warmth of the stifling stove—we arrived in the young Birmingham of America around 10 PM, and quickly settled into a comfy bed at a nice hotel.

If you wish a good idea of Pittsburg, you should go to Birmingham, and reduce its size, in your imagination, to one-fourth the reality; after which, let the streets of this creation of your fancy be "top-dressed" about a foot deep with equal proportions of clay and coal-dust; then try to realize in your mind the effect which a week's violent struggle between Messrs. Snow and Sleet would produce, and you will thus be enabled to enjoy some idea of the charming scene which Pittsburg presented on the day of my visit. But if this young Birmingham has so much in common with the elder, there is one grand feature it possesses which the other wants. The Ohio and Monongahela rivers form the delta on which it is built, and on the bosom of the former the fruits of its labour are borne down to New Orleans, viâ the Mississippi—a distance of two thousand and twenty-five miles exactly. Coal and iron abound in the neighbourhood; they are as handy, in reality, as the Egyptian geese are in the legend, where they are stated to fly about ready roasted, crying, "Come and eat me!" Perhaps, then, you will ask, why is the town not larger, and the business not more active? The answer is simple. The price of labour is so high, that they cannot compote with the parent rival; and the ad valorem duty on iron, though it may bring in a revenue to the government, is no protection to the home trade. What changes emigration from the Old World may eventually produce, time alone can decide; but it requires no prophetic vision to foresee that the undeveloped mineral riches of this continent must some day be worked with telling effect upon England's trade. I must not deceive you into a belief that the Ohio is always navigable. So far from that being the case, I understand that, for weeks and months even, it is constantly fordable. As late as the 23rd of November, the large passage-boats were unable to make regular passages, owing to their so frequently getting aground; and the consequence was, that we were doomed to prosecute our journey to Cincinnati by railroad, to my infinite—but, as my friend said, not inexpressible—regret.

If you want a good sense of Pittsburgh, you should visit Birmingham and imagine shrinking it down to one-fourth of its actual size. Then, picture the streets of this imagined place layered about a foot deep with equal parts clay and coal dust. After that, try to visualize the impact of a week-long battle between Snow and Sleet, and you'll get an idea of the charming scene that Pittsburgh was like when I visited. But while this younger Birmingham shares many similarities with the older one, there's a major feature that the older one lacks. The Ohio and Monongahela rivers create the delta where it's located, and the goods produced there are transported down the former to New Orleans, via the Mississippi—a precise distance of two thousand and twenty-five miles. Coal and iron are plentiful in the area; they're as accessible as the legendary Egyptian geese that supposedly fly around pre-cooked, calling out, "Come and eat me!" You might then wonder why the town isn’t bigger or busier. The answer is straightforward. Labor costs are so high that they can’t compete with their main rival; and while the ad valorem duty on iron might generate income for the government, it doesn’t help local businesses. What changes immigration from the Old World might eventually bring is uncertain, but it doesn't take a visionary to predict that the untapped mineral wealth of this continent will eventually impact England's trade. I shouldn’t mislead you into thinking the Ohio is always navigable. Quite the opposite, I understand it can be forded for weeks and even months at a time. As recently as November 23rd, large passenger boats were unable to operate regularly because they kept running aground; as a result, we had to continue our journey to Cincinnati by railroad, which filled me with regret—even though, as my friend said, it wasn’t completely unbearable.

Noon found us at the station, taking the last bite of fresh air before we entered the travelling oven. Fortunately, the weather was rather finer than it had been, and more windows were open. There is something solemn and grand in traversing, with the speed of the wind, miles and miles of the desolate forest. Sometimes you pass a whole hour without any—the slightest—sign of animal life: not a bird, nor a beast, nor a being. The hissing train rattles along; the trumpet-tongued whistle—or rather horn—booms far away in the breeze, and finds no echo; the giant monarchs of the forest line the road on either side, like a guard of Titans, their nodding heads inquiring, as it were curiously, why their ranks were thinned, and what strange meteor is that which, with clatter and roar, rushes past, disturbing their peaceful solitude. Patience my noble friends; patience, I say. A few short years more, and many of you, like your deceased brethren, will bend your proud heads level with the dust, and those giant limbs, which now kiss the summer sun and dare the winter's blast, will feed that insatiate meteor's stomach, or crackle beneath some adventurous pioneer's soup-kettle. But, never mind; like good soldiers in a good cause, you will sacrifice yourselves for the public good; and possibly some of you may be carved into figures of honour, and dance triumphantly on the surge's crest in the advance post of glory on a dashing clipper's bows, girt with a band on which is inscribed, in letters of gold, the imperishable name of Washington or Franklin.

Noon found us at the station, taking our last breath of fresh air before stepping into the traveling oven. Luckily, the weather was nicer than before, and more windows were open. There’s something solemn and majestic about speeding through miles and miles of desolate forest. Sometimes you can go a whole hour without seeing the slightest sign of animal life: not a bird, nor a beast, nor a person. The hissing train rattles along; the loud whistle—or rather horn—booms far away in the breeze, and there’s no echo; the giant trees of the forest line the track on either side, like a guard of Titans, their swaying heads seeming to curiously ask why their ranks are thinning and what strange meteor that is, rushing past with clatter and roar, disturbing their peaceful solitude. Patience, my noble friends; patience, I say. A few short years more, and many of you, like your deceased brethren, will bow your proud heads to the dust, and those giant limbs, which now bask in the summer sun and brave the winter's chill, will feed that insatiable meteor's appetite or crackle beneath some adventurous pioneer’s cooking pot. But don’t worry; like good soldiers in a noble cause, you will sacrifice yourselves for the greater good; and perhaps some of you may be carved into figures of honor, soaring triumphantly on the crest of waves in the lead post of glory on a swift ship’s bow, adorned with a banner inscribed in gold letters with the everlasting name of Washington or Franklin.

Being of a generous disposition, I have thrown out these hints in the hopes some needy American author may make his fortune, and immortalize his country, by writing "The Life and Adventures of the Forest Monarch;" or, as the public like mystery, he might make a good hit by entitling it "The Child of the Woods that danced on the Wave." Swift has immortalized a tub; other authors have endeavoured to immortalize a shilling, and a halfpenny. Let that great country which professes to be able to "whip creation" take a noble subject worthy of such high pretensions.

Being generous by nature, I've shared these suggestions in the hopes that some struggling American author might find success and bring lasting recognition to their country by writing "The Life and Adventures of the Forest Monarch;" or, since the public enjoys a bit of mystery, they might do well to call it "The Child of the Woods that Danced on the Wave." Swift has made a name for himself with a tub; other writers have tried to make a name for a shilling and a halfpenny. Let that great nation that claims it can "whip creation" tackle a worthy subject that lives up to such lofty claims.

Here we are at Cleveland; and, "by the powers of Mercury"—this expletive originated, I believe, with a proud barometer,—it is raining cats and dogs and a host of inferior animals. Everybody seems very impatient, for all are getting out, and yet we have not reached the station,—no; and they don't mean to get there at present. Possession is nine points of the law, and another train is ensconced there. Wood, of course, is so dear in this country, and railroads give such low interest—varying from six to forty per cent.—that they can't afford to have sufficient shedding. Well, out we get. Touters from the hotels cry out lustily. We hear the name of the house to which we are bound, and prepare to follow. The touter carries a lantern of that ingenious size which helps to make the darkness more visible; two steps, and you are over the ankles in mud. "Show a light, boy." He turns round, and, placing his lantern close to the ground, you see at a glance the horrid truth revealed—you are in a perfect mud swamp; so, tuck up your trowsers, and wade away to the omnibuses, about a quarter of a mile off. Gracious me! there are two ladies, with their dresses hitched up like kilts, sliding and floundering through the slushy road. How miserable they must be, poor things! Not the least; they are both tittering and giggling merrily; they are accustomed to it, and habit is second nature. A man from the Old World of advanced civilization—in these matters of minor comforts, at least—will soon learn to conduct himself upon the principle, that where ignorance is bliss, wisdom becomes folly. Laughing, like love, is catching; so these two jolly ladies put me in a good humour, and I laughed my way to the 'bus half up to my knees in mud. After all, it made it lighter work than growling, and go I must; so thank you, ladies, for the cheering example.

Here we are in Cleveland; and, "by the powers of Mercury"—I think this phrase came from a proud barometer—it's pouring rain like crazy. Everyone seems really impatient as they're all getting out, but we haven't reached the station—nope, and they don’t plan to get there anytime soon. Possession is nine points of the law, and another train is parked there. Wood is really expensive in this country, and railroads have such low interest rates—ranging from six to forty percent—that they can't afford to build enough shelters. Well, out we go. Hustlers from the hotels are shouting loudly. We hear the name of the place we're headed to and get ready to follow. The hustler is holding a lantern that's just big enough to make the darkness seem worse; just two steps in, and you're ankle-deep in mud. "Show a light, man." He turns around and, placing his lantern close to the ground, reveals the ugly truth—you’re in a total mud pit; so, roll up your pants, and wade on to the omnibuses, about a quarter mile away. Goodness! There are two ladies with their dresses hiked up like kilts, slipping and struggling through the muddy road. They must be so miserable, poor things! Not at all; they’re both giggling and having a great time; they’re used to it, and being in the habit makes it feel normal. A man from the advanced civilization of the Old World—in terms of these small comforts, at least—will soon learn to operate on the principle that ignorance is bliss, but knowing too much can be a hassle. Laughter, like love, is contagious; so, these two cheerful ladies put me in a good mood, and I laughed my way to the bus with my legs half-covered in mud. After all, it made the journey feel easier than complaining, and I had to go; so, thank you, ladies, for the uplifting example.

Hot tea soon washes away from a thirsty and wearied soul the remembrance of muddy boots, and a good Havana soothes the wounded spirit. After enjoying both, I retired to rest, as I hoped, for we had to make an early start in the morning. Scarce was I in bed, ere the house rang again with laughing and romping just outside my door; black and white, old and young, male and female, all seemed chorusing together—feet clattered, passages echoed—it was a very Babel of noise and confusion. What strange beings we are! Not two hours before, I had said and felt that laughing was catching; now, although the merry chirp of youth mingled with it, I wished the whole party at the residence of an old gentleman whose name I care not to mention. May we not truly say of ourselves what the housemaid says of the missing article—"Really, sir, I don't know nothing at all about it?" A few hours before, I was joining in the laugh as I waded nearly knee-deep in mud, and now I was lying in a comfortable bed grinding my teeth at the same joyous sounds.

Hot tea quickly washes away the memories of muddy boots from a thirsty and tired soul, and a good cigar calms the spirit. After enjoying both, I went to bed, hoping for a good night's rest since we needed to leave early in the morning. Hardly was I in bed when the house filled with laughter and noise right outside my door; people of all ages and backgrounds seemed to be reveling together—feet were stomping, hallways echoed—it was a complete chaos of sound. How strange we are! Just two hours before, I had said and felt that laughter is contagious; now, even though the cheerful sounds of youth mixed in, I wished the whole crowd would vanish to the home of some old gentleman I won't name. Can we not truly say about ourselves what the housemaid says about a missing item—"Honestly, sir, I don’t know anything about it?" A few hours earlier, I was laughing while trudging almost knee-deep in mud, and now I was lying in a comfy bed, grinding my teeth at the same happy sounds.

It took three messages to the proprietor, before order was restored and I was asleep. In the morning, I found that the cause of all the rumpus was a marriage that had taken place in the hotel; and the master and mistress being happy, the servants caught the joyous infection, and got the children to share it with them. I must not be understood to cast any reflections upon the happy pair, when I say that the marriage took place in the morning, and that the children were laughing at night, for remember, I never inquired into the parentage of the little ducks. On learning the truth, I was rejoiced to feel that they had not gone to the residence of the old gentleman before alluded to, and I made resolutions to restrain my temper in future. After a night's rest, with a cup of hot café au lait before you, how easy and pleasant good resolutions are.

It took three messages to the hotel owner before things settled down and I could finally sleep. In the morning, I discovered that the hubbub was caused by a wedding that happened at the hotel; since the bride and groom were happy, the staff caught the joy and got the kids to join in the celebration. I want to be clear that I'm not criticizing the happy couple when I mention that the wedding took place in the morning and the kids were laughing at night; after all, I never asked about the little ones' parents. When I learned the truth, I was relieved to realize they hadn't gone to visit the old gentleman I mentioned earlier, and I resolved to keep my temper in check from then on. After a good night's sleep, with a cup of hot café au lait in front of me, it's amazing how easy and enjoyable it is to make good resolutions.

Having finished a hasty breakfast, we tumbled into an omnibus, packed like herrings in a barrel, for our number was "Legion," and the omnibus was "Zoar." Off we went to the railway; such a mass of mud I never saw. Is it from this peculiarity that the city takes its name? This, however, does not prevent it from being a very thriving place, and destined, I believe, to be a town of considerable importance, as soon as the grain and mineral wealth of Michigan, Wisconsin, &c., get more fully developed, and when the new canal pours the commerce of Lake Superior into Lake Erie. Cleveland is situated on the slope of a hill commanding a beautiful and extensive view; the latter I was told, for as it rained incessantly, I had no opportunity of judging. Here we are at the station, i.e., two hundred yards off it, which we are allowed to walk, so as to damp ourselves pleasantly before we start. Places taken, in we get; we move a few hundred yards, and come to a stand-still, waiting for another train, which allows us the excitement of suspense for nearly an hour and a half, and then we really start for Cincinnati. The cars have the usual attractions formerly enumerated: grin and bear it is the order of the day; scenery is shrouded in mist, night closes in with her sable mantle, and about eleven we reach the hotel, where, by the blessing of a happy contrast, we soon forget the wretched day's work we have gone through.

Having finished a quick breakfast, we scrambled onto a bus, packed in tight like sardines, as our group was "Legion" and the bus was "Zoar." Off we went to the train station; I've never seen such a mess of mud. Is that why the city has its name? Still, that doesn’t stop it from being a bustling place, and I believe it’s set to become quite important once the grain and mineral resources of Michigan, Wisconsin, etc., are fully tapped, and when the new canal brings the commerce of Lake Superior into Lake Erie. Cleveland is located on the slope of a hill that offers a beautiful and wide view; I was told so since it rained nonstop, and I didn’t have a chance to see for myself. Here we are at the station, i.e., two hundred yards away, which we have to walk, dampening ourselves a bit before we set off. We take our seats, get on board, move a few hundred yards, and then come to a halt, waiting for another train, leaving us in suspense for almost an hour and a half before we really begin our journey to Cincinnati. The train has the usual features mentioned earlier: just grin and bear it as the motto for the day; the scenery is hidden in mist, night falls with its dark cloak, and around eleven, we arrive at the hotel, where, in a fortunate contrast, we soon forget the miserable day we’ve had.

Here we are in the "Queen City of the West," the rapid rise whereof is astounding. By a statistical work, I find that in 1800 it numbered only 750 inhabitants; in 1840, 46,338—1850, 115,438: these calculations merely include its corporate limits. If the suburbs be added, the population will reach 150,000: of which number only about 3000 are coloured. The Americans constitute 54 per cent.; Germans, 28; English, 16; other foreigners, 2 per cent. of the population. They have 102 schools, and 357 teachers, and 20,737 pupils are yearly instructed by these means. Of these schools 19 are free, instructing 12,240 pupils, not in mere writing and reading, but rising in the scale to "algebra, grammar, history, composition, declamation, music, drawing," &c. The annual cost of these schools is between 13,000l. and 14,000l. There is also a "Central School," where the higher branches of literature and science are taught to those who have time and talent; in short, a "Free College."

Here we are in the "Queen City of the West," which has experienced an incredible growth. According to a statistical report, in 1800 the population was only 750; by 1840, it had grown to 46,338; and by 1850, it reached 115,438. These figures only account for the city limits. If we include the suburbs, the population goes up to 150,000, with about 3,000 being people of color. Americans make up 54 percent; Germans, 28 percent; English, 16 percent; and other foreigners, 2 percent of the population. The city has 102 schools and 357 teachers, educating 20,737 students each year. Among these schools, 19 are free, serving 12,240 students, and they don't just teach reading and writing but also cover subjects like algebra, grammar, history, composition, declamation, music, drawing, and more. The yearly cost of these schools is between £13,000 and £14,000. There is also a "Central School" where advanced topics in literature and science are offered to those with time and ability; essentially, a "Free College."

According to the ordinance for the North-Western territory of 1787, "religion, morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall for ever be encouraged." Congress, in pursuance of this laudable object, "has reserved one thirty-sixth part of all public lands for the support of education in the States in which the lands lie; besides which, it has added endowments for numerous universities, &c." We have seen that the public schools in this city cost 13,500l., of which sum they receive from the State fund above alluded to 1500l., the remainder being raised by a direct tax upon the property of the city, and increased from time to time in proportion to the wants of the schools. One of the schools is for coloured children, and contains 360 pupils. There are 91 churches and 4 synagogues, and the population is thus classed—Jews, 3 per cent.; Roman Catholics, 35; Protestant, 62. The Press is represented by 12 daily and 20 weekly papers. From these statistics, dry though they may appear, one must confess that the means of education and religious instruction are provided for in a manner that reflects the highest credit on this "Queen City of the West."

According to the 1787 ordinance for the North-Western Territory, "religion, morality, and knowledge are essential for good government and the happiness of humanity, so schools and educational resources will always be encouraged." Congress, in pursuit of this commendable goal, "has set aside one thirty-sixth of all public lands for the support of education in the states where the lands are located; in addition, it has provided funding for numerous universities, etc." We have observed that the public schools in this city cost £13,500, of which they receive £1,500 from the aforementioned state fund, with the remainder coming from a direct tax on city property, which is adjusted over time based on the needs of the schools. One of the schools is for Black children and serves 360 students. There are 91 churches and 4 synagogues, and the population is classified as follows: Jews, 3 percent; Roman Catholics, 35 percent; Protestants, 62 percent. The press is represented by 12 daily and 20 weekly newspapers. Despite the seemingly dry nature of these statistics, one must acknowledge that the resources for education and religious instruction are provided in a way that reflects great credit on this "Queen City of the West."

It is chiefly owing to the untiring perseverance of Mr. Longworth, that they have partially succeeded in producing wine. As far as I could ascertain, they made about fifty thousand gallons a year. The wine is called "Catawba," from the grape, and is made both still and sparkling. Thanks to the kind hospitality of a friend, I was enabled to taste the best of each. I found the still wine rather thin and tart, but, as the weather was very cold, that need not affect the truth of my friend's assertion, that in summer it was a very pleasant beverage. The sparkling wine was much more palatable, and reminded me of a very superior kind of perry. They cannot afford to sell it on the spot under four shillings a bottle, and of course the hotels double that price immediately. I think there can be no doubt that a decided improvement must be made in it before it can become valuable enough to find its way into the European market; although I must confess that, as it is, I should be most happy to see it supplant the poisonous liquids called champagne which appear at our "suppers," and at many of our hotels.

It’s mainly thanks to Mr. Longworth's relentless dedication that they have managed to produce wine to some extent. From what I gathered, they produce about fifty thousand gallons a year. The wine is called "Catawba," after the grape, and it comes in both still and sparkling varieties. Thanks to a friend's generous hospitality, I got to taste the best of each. I found the still wine a bit thin and tart, but since it was really cold outside, that shouldn't undermine my friend's claim that it’s very enjoyable in summer. The sparkling wine was much better and reminded me of a high-quality type of perry. They can't sell it for less than four shillings a bottle, and hotels immediately double that price. I have no doubt that significant improvements need to be made before it can be valuable enough for the European market; although I must confess that as it stands, I would be very pleased to see it replace the harmful drinks known as champagne that show up at our "suppers" and several of our hotels.

The "Burnet House" is the principal hotel here, and afforded me every comfort I could have expected, not the least being the satisfaction I derived from the sight of the proprietor, who, in the spotless cleanliness of his person and his "dimity," and surrounded by hosts of his travelling inmates—myself among the number—stood forth in bold relief, like a snowball in a coal-hole.

The "Burnet House" is the main hotel here and provided me with every comfort I could have hoped for, especially the satisfaction of seeing the owner, who, in his immaculate appearance and his "dimity," stood out prominently among a crowd of his guests—including me—like a snowball in a coal hole.

But we must now visit the great lion of the place, whence the city obtains the sobriquet of "Porkopolis," i.e., the auto da fé of the unclean animal. We will stroll down and begin at the beginning; but first let me warn you, if your nerves are at all delicate, to pass this description over, for, though perfectly true, it is very horrid. "Poor piggy must die" is a very old saying; whence it came I cannot tell; but were it not for its great antiquity, Cincinnati might claim the honour. Let us however to the deadly work!

But now we need to check out the big lion of the area, which is where the city gets the nickname "Porkopolis," meaning the celebration of the unclean animal. We'll take a walk and start from the beginning; but first, I have to warn you, if you're sensitive, you might want to skip this description, because while it's completely true, it's pretty gruesome. "Poor piggy must die" is an old saying; I can't trace its origins, but if it weren't for its long history, Cincinnati could take credit for it. Now, let's get to the grim business!

The post of slaughter is at the outskirts of the town, and as you approach it, the squeaking of endless droves proceeding to their doom fills the air, and in wet weather the muck they make is beyond description, as the roads and streets are carelessly made, and as carelessly left to fate. When we were within a couple of hundred yards of the slaughter-house, they were absolutely knee-deep, and, there being no trottoir, we were compelled to wait till an empty cart came by, when, for a small consideration, Jonathan ferried us through the mud-pond. Behind the house is the large pen in which the pigs are first gathered, and hence they are driven up an inclined plane into a small partition about twelve feet square, capable of containing from ten to fifteen pigs at once. In this inclosure stands the executioner, armed with a hammer,—something in shape like that used to break stones for the roads in England—his shirt-sleeves turned up, so that nothing may impede the free use of his brawny arms. The time arrived, down comes the hammer with deadly accuracy on the forehead of poor piggy, generally killing but sometimes only stunning him, in which case, as he awakes to consciousness in the scalding caldron, his struggles are frightful to look at, but happily very short. A trap-hatch opens at the side of this enclosure, through which the corpses are thrust into the sticking-room, whence the blood flows into tanks beneath, to be sold, together with the hoofs and hair, to the manufacturers of prussiate of potash and Prussian blue. Thence they are pushed down an inclined plane into a trough containing a thousand gallons of boiling water, and broad enough to take in piggy lengthways. By the time they have passed down this caldron, they are ready for scraping, for which purpose a large table is joined on to the lower end of the caldron, and on which they are artistically thrown. Five men stand in a row on each side of the table, armed with scrapers, and, as piggy passes down, he gets scraped cleaner and cleaner, till the last polishes him as smooth as a yearling baby. Having thus reached the lower end of the table, there are a quantity of hooks fitted to strong wooden arms, which revolve round a stout pillar, and which, in describing the circle, plumb the lower end of the table. On these piggy is hooked, and the operation of cutting open and cleansing is performed—at the rate of three a minute—by operators steeped in blood, and standing in an ocean of the same, despite the eternal buckets of water with which a host of boys keep deluging the floor. These operations finished, piggy is hung up on hooks to cool, and, when sufficiently so, he is removed thence to the other end of the building, ready for sending to the preparing-houses, whither he and his defunct brethren are convoyed in carts, open at the side, and containing about thirty pigs each.

The slaughterhouse is on the edge of town, and as you get closer, the sound of endless animals heading to their fate fills the air. In wet weather, the mess they create is indescribable, as the roads and streets are poorly made and carelessly neglected. When we were just a couple of hundred yards from the slaughterhouse, we found ourselves knee-deep in muck, and with no sidewalk, we had to wait for an empty cart to come by, at which point Jonathan helped us through the muddy puddle for a small fee. Behind the building is a large pen where the pigs are first gathered, and they’re then driven up an inclined ramp into a small enclosure about twelve feet square, which can hold ten to fifteen pigs at a time. Inside this area stands the executioner, wielding a hammer—similar to the kind used for breaking stones on roads in England—with his shirt sleeves rolled up for maximum arm movement. When the moment comes, the hammer comes down with deadly precision on the forehead of the unfortunate pig, usually killing it right away, but sometimes just stunning it. If it only gets stunned, the pig wakes up in the boiling vat, and its struggles are horrifying to watch, but fortunately brief. A trap door opens on the side of this enclosure, through which the carcasses are pushed into the sticking room, where the blood drains into tanks below, to be sold along with the hooves and hair to manufacturers of potash and Prussian blue. From there, they are slid down an inclined plane into a trough holding a thousand gallons of boiling water, wide enough to accommodate the pig's length. By the time they come out of this cauldron, they are ready to be scraped clean; a large table is attached to the end of the cauldron, where the pigs are tossed. Five workers stand on each side of the table with scrapers, and as the pigs pass through, they are cleaned more and more until the last touch leaves them as smooth as a newborn. After reaching the end of the table, the pigs are hung on hooks attached to strong wooden arms that rotate around a sturdy pillar, lowering the pigs into position. The task of cutting open and cleaning them is done at a rate of three a minute, by workers soaked in blood and standing in a pool of it, despite the constant buckets of water being thrown on the floor by a group of boys. Once these processes are complete, the pigs are hung on hooks to cool, and when they have cooled sufficiently, they are taken to the other end of the building, ready to be sent to the processing houses, where they and their deceased companions are transported in open-sided carts that can carry about thirty pigs each.

The whole of this part of the town during porking season is alive with these carts, and we will now follow one, so that we may see how piggy is finally disposed of. The cart ascends the hill till it comes to a line of buildings with the canal running at the back thereof; a huge and solid block lies ready for the corpse, and at each side appear a pair of brawny arms grasping a long cleaver made scimitar-shape; smaller tables are around, and artists with sharp knives attend thereat. Piggy is brought in from the cart, and laid on the solid block; one blow of the scimitar-shaped cleaver severs his head, which is thrown aside and sold in the town, chiefly, I believe, to Germans, though of course a Hebrew might purchase if he had a fancy therefor. The head off, two blows sever him lengthways; the hams, the shoulders, and the rib-pieces fly off at a blow each, and it has been stated that "two hands, in less than thirteen hours, cut up eight hundred and fifty hogs, averaging over two hundred pounds each, two others placing them on the blocks for the purpose. All these hogs were weighed singly on the scales, in the course of eleven hours. Another hand trimmed the hams—seventeen hundred pieces—as fast as they were separated from the carcasses. The hogs were thus cut up and disposed of at the rate of more than one to the minute." Knifemen then come into play, cutting out the inner fat, and trimming the hams neatly, to send across the way for careful curing; the other parts are put in the pickle-barrels, except the fat, which, after carefully removing all the small pieces of meat that the first hasty cutting may have left, is thrown into a boiling caldron to be melted down into lard. Barring the time taken up in the transit from the slaughter-house to these cutting-up stores, and the time he hangs to cool, it may be safely asserted, that from the moment piggy gets his first blow till his carcass is curing and his fat boiling into lard, not more than five minutes elapse.

The entire area of town during pig season is bustling with these carts, and now we'll follow one to see how the pig is finally handled. The cart climbs the hill until it reaches a row of buildings with the canal running behind them; a large, sturdy block is prepared for the body, and on each side are strong arms holding a long, curved cleaver. Smaller tables are nearby, with workers using sharp knives. The pig is taken from the cart and placed on the solid block; a single swing of the cleaver takes off its head, which is discarded and sold in town, mostly, I believe, to Germans, although a Hebrew might buy it if he wanted. Once the head is off, two strikes cut the pig lengthwise; the hams, shoulders, and ribs are removed with one chop each. It's been reported that "two people, in less than thirteen hours, processed eight hundred and fifty pigs, averaging over two hundred pounds each, while two others placed them on the cutting blocks. All these pigs were individually weighed during eleven hours. Another person trimmed the hams—seventeen hundred pieces—while they were separated from the carcasses. The pigs were thus broken down and processed at a rate of more than one per minute." Then the knife workers step in, removing the inner fat and neatly trimming the hams to send for careful curing; the other parts go into pickle barrels, except for the fat, which, after carefully getting rid of any small meat pieces left from the initial quick cuts, is dropped into a boiling pot to be rendered into lard. Aside from the time taken to move from the slaughterhouse to the cutting sites and the time the carcass hangs to cool, it can be confidently stated that from the moment the pig gets its first strike until its body is curing and its fat boiling into lard, no more than five minutes pass.

A table of piggy statistics for one year may not be uninteresting to my reader, or, at all events, to an Irish pig-driver:—

A table of pig statistics for a year might be interesting to my reader, or at least to an Irish pig-handler:—

    180,000 Barrels of Pork, 196 lbs. each       35,280,000 lbs.
    Bacon                                        25,000,000
    No. 1 Lard                                   16,500,000
    Star Candles, made by hydraulic pressure.     2,500,000
    Bar Soap                                      6,200,000
    Fancy Soap, etc.                               8,800,000
                                                 ----------
                                                 94,280,000
Besides Lard Oil, 1,200,000 gallons.

Some idea of the activity exhibited may be formed, when I tell you that the season for these labours averages only ten weeks, beginning with the second week in November and closing in January; and that the annual number cured at Cincinnati is about 500,000 head, and the value of these animals when cured, &c., was estimated in 1851 at about 1,155,000l. What touching statistics the foregoing would be for a Hebrew or a Mussulman! The wonder to me is, that the former can locate in such an unclean atmosphere; at all events, I hold it as a sure sign that there is money to be made.

Some idea of the activity displayed can be gained when I tell you that the season for these efforts lasts only ten weeks, starting in the second week of November and ending in January; and that the annual number processed in Cincinnati is around 500,000 heads, with the value of these animals when processed estimated in 1851 at about £1,155,000. What striking statistics this would be for a Jew or a Muslim! I find it surprising that the former can settle in such an unclean environment; in any case, I see it as a clear indication that there is money to be made.

They are very proud of their beef here, and it is very good; for they possess all the best English breeds, both here and across the river in Kentucky. They stall-feed very fat, no doubt; but though generally very good, I have never, in any part of the States, tasted beef equal to the best in England. All the fat is on the outside; it is never marbled as the best beef is with us. The price is very moderate, being about fourpence a pound.

They take great pride in their beef here, and it's really good; they have all the top English breeds, both here and over in Kentucky. They definitely feed them to get very fat; while it's usually quite good, I’ve never tasted beef in any part of the States that matches the best in England. All the fat is on the outside; it’s never marbled like the best beef is back home. The price is very reasonable, around four pence a pound.

Monongahela whisky is a most important article of manufacture in the neighbourhood, being produced annually to the value of 560,000l. There are forty-four foundries, one-third of which are employed in the stove-trade; as many as a thousand stoves have been made in one day. The value of foundry products is estimated at 725,000l. annually.

Monongahela whisky is a significant product in the area, with an annual production value of £560,000. There are forty-four foundries, a third of which are focused on stove manufacturing; as many as a thousand stoves can be made in a single day. The annual value of foundry products is estimated at £725,000.

If commerce be the true wealth and prosperity of a nation, there never was a nation in the history of the world that possessed by nature the advantages which this country enjoys. Take the map, and look at the position of this city; nay, go two hundred miles higher up, to Marietta. From that port, which is nearly two thousand miles from the ocean, the "Muskingum," a barque of three hundred and fifty tons, went laden with provisions, direct to Liverpool, in 1845, and various other vessels have since that time been built at Cincinnati; one, a vessel of eight hundred and fifty tons, called the "Minnesota:" in short, there is quite an active business going on; shipbuilders from Maine coming here to carry on their trade—wood, labour, and lodging being much cheaper than on the Eastern coast.

If trade is the real wealth and success of a nation, then no other country in history has had the natural advantages that this one does. Take a look at the map and see where this city is located; in fact, go two hundred miles upstream to Marietta. From that port, which is nearly two thousand miles from the ocean, the "Muskingum," a barge weighing three hundred and fifty tons, carried supplies directly to Liverpool in 1845, and since then, several other ships have been built in Cincinnati; one, an eight hundred and fifty-ton vessel named the "Minnesota." In short, there's a lot of active business happening; shipbuilders from Maine are coming here to continue their work—since wood, labor, and housing are much cheaper than on the East Coast.

It is now time to continue our journey, and as the water is high enough, we will embark on the "Ohio," and steam away to Louisville. The place you embark from is called the levee: and as all the large towns on the river have a levee, I may as well explain the term at once. It is nothing more nor less than the sloping off of the banks of a river, and then paving them, by which operation two objects are gained:—first, the banks are secured from the inroads of the stream; secondly, the boats are thereby enabled at all times to land passengers and cargo with perfect facility. These levees extend the whole length of the town, and are lined with steamers of all kinds and classes, but all built on a similar plan; and the number of them gives sure indication of the commercial activity of Cincinnati. When a steamer is about to start, book-pedlers crowd on board with baskets full of their—generally speaking—trashy ware. Sometimes these pedlers are grown-up men, but generally boys about twelve or fourteen years of age. On going up to one of these latter, what was my astonishment to find in his basket, volume after volume of publications such as Holywell-street scarce ever dared to exhibit; these he offered and commended with the most unblushing effrontery. The first lad having such a collection, I thought I would look at the others, to see if their baskets were similarly supplied; I found them all alike without exception, I then became curious to know if these debauched little urchins found any purchasers, and, to ascertain the fact, I ensconced myself among some of the freight, and watched one of them. Presently a passenger came up, and these books were brought to his notice: he looked cautiously round, and, thinking himself unobserved, he began to examine them. The lad, finding the bait had taken, then looked cautiously round on his side, and stealthily drew two more books from his breast, evidently of the same kind, and it is reasonable to suppose infinitely worse. After a careful examination of the various volumes, the passenger pulled out his purse, paid his money, and walked off with eight of these Holywell-street publications, taking them immediately into his cabin. I saw one or two more purchasers, before I left my concealment. And now I may as well observe, that the sale of those works is not confined to one place; wherever I went on board a steamer, I was sure to find boys with baskets of books, and among them many of the kind above alluded to. In talking to an American gentleman on this subject, he told me that it was indeed but too common a practice, although by law nominally prohibited; and he further added, that once asking a vendor why he had such blackguard books which nobody would buy, he took up one of the worst, and said, "Why, sir, this book is so eagerly sought after, that I have the utmost difficulty in keeping up the requisite supply." It is a melancholy reflection, that in a country where education is at every one's door, and poverty at no one's, such unblushing exhibitions of immorality should exist.

It’s time to continue our journey, and since the water is high enough, we’ll board the “Ohio” and head to Louisville. The place where we board is called the levee; since all the major towns along the river have a levee, I might as well explain the term. It’s simply the sloping banks of a river that have been paved, which serves two purposes: first, it protects the banks from the encroaching water; and second, it allows boats to easily load and unload passengers and cargo at any time. These levees stretch all along the town and are lined with all sorts of steamers, all built in a similar way, and the number of them clearly shows the commercial activity of Cincinnati. When a steamer is about to depart, book peddlers rush on board with baskets full of their usually low-quality products. Sometimes these peddlers are adults, but more often they’re boys around twelve or fourteen years old. When I approached one of these boys, I was shocked to find in his basket volume after volume of publications that places like Holywell-street would rarely dare to show; he offered them boldly. Seeing the first boy with such a collection made me curious to check the others as well, and I found them all had similar contents. I became interested in whether these little hustlers actually found buyers, so I hid among the cargo and watched one of them. Soon, a passenger approached, and the boy presented his books: the passenger cautiously looked around, and thinking he was unnoticed, he started to examine them. The boy, seeing that he had a potential customer, peered around cautiously himself and stealthily pulled out two more books from his chest, clearly of the same type, and probably even worse. After a careful look at the various volumes, the passenger took out his wallet, paid, and walked off with eight of those Holywell-street publications, taking them straight to his cabin. I saw a couple more buyers before I left my hiding spot. I should mention that the sale of these works isn’t limited to one location; whenever I boarded a steamer, I was sure to find boys with baskets of books, many of them similar to those already mentioned. In conversation with an American gentleman about this, he told me that it’s unfortunately quite a common practice, even though it’s nominally illegal. He added that when he once asked a vendor why he had such trashy books that nobody would buy, the vendor picked up one of the worst and said, “Why, sir, this book is so in demand that I can hardly keep up with the supply.” It’s a sad reality that in a country where education is accessible to everyone, and poverty isn’t an issue, such blatant displays of immorality exist.

We embarked in the "Lady Franklin," and were soon "floating down the river of the O-hi-o." The banks are undulating, and prettily interspersed with cottage villas, which peep out from the woods, and are clotted about the more cultivated parts; but, despite this, the dreary mantle of winter threw a cold churlishness over everything. The boat I shall describe hereafter, when I have seen more of them, for their general features are the same; but there was a specimen of the fair sex on board, to whom I must introduce you, as I may never see her like again.

We set off on the "Lady Franklin" and soon found ourselves "floating down the river of the O-hi-o." The banks are rolling and nicely dotted with cottage villas that peek out from the woods and cluster around the more developed areas; however, the dull blanket of winter cast a cold, unfriendly vibe over everything. I’ll describe the boat later, once I’ve seen more of them, since their general features are similar; but there was a remarkable woman on board whom I need to introduce you to, as I may never meet someone like her again.

The main piece was the counterpart of a large steamer's funnel cut off at about four feet two inches high, a most perfect cylinder, and of a dark greyish hue: a sombre coloured riband supported a ditto coloured apron. If asked where this was fastened, I suppose she would have replied, "Round the waist, to be sure;" yet, if Lord Rosse's telescope had been applied, no such break in the smooth surface of the cylinder could have been descried. The arms hung down on either side like the funnel of a cabin stove, exciting the greatest wonder and the liveliest curiosity to know how the skin of the shoulder obtained the elasticity requisite to exhibit such a phenomenon. On the top of the cylinder was a beautifully polished ebony pedestal, about two inches high on one side, tapering away to nothing at the other, so that whatever might be placed thereon, would lie at an angle of forty-five degrees. This pedestal did duty for a neck; and upon it was placed a thing which, viewed as a whole, resembled a demijohn. The lower part was pillowed on the cylinder, no gleam of light ever penetrating between the two. Upon the upper surface, at a proper distance from the extremity, two lips appeared, very like two pieces of raw beefsteak picked up off a dusty road.

The main piece was the equivalent of a large steamer's funnel cut off at about four feet two inches high, a perfectly shaped cylinder in a dark gray color: a similarly colored ribbon held up a matching apron. If someone asked where this was fastened, I guess she would have said, "Around the waist, of course;" yet, if Lord Rosse's telescope had been used, no break in the smooth surface of the cylinder would have been seen. The arms hung down on either side like the funnel of a cabin stove, sparking great wonder and curiosity about how the skin on the shoulder had the elasticity needed to create such a phenomenon. On top of the cylinder was a beautifully polished ebony pedestal, around two inches high on one side, tapering off to nothing on the other side, so anything placed there would lie at a forty-five-degree angle. This pedestal served as a neck; and on it sat something that, as a whole, looked like a demijohn. The lower part rested on the cylinder, with no light ever getting in between them. On the upper surface, at the right distance from the end, two lips appeared, resembling two pieces of raw beefsteak picked up off a dusty road.

While wrapt in admiration of this interesting spot, the owner thereof was seized with a desire to yawn, to obtain which luxury it was requisite to throw back the demijohn into nearly a horizontal line, so as to relieve the lower end from its pressure on the cylinder. The aid of both hands was called in to assist in supporting her intellectual depository. This feat accomplished, a roseate gulf was revealed, which would have made the stout heart of Quintus Curtius quail ere he took the awful plunge. Time or contest had removed the ivory obstructions in the centre, but the shores on each side of the gulf were terrifically iron-bound, and appeared equal to crushing the hardest granite; the shinbone of an ox would have been to her like an oyster to ordinary mortals. She revelled in this luxurious operation so long, that I began to fear she was suffering from the antipodes to a lockjaw, and that she was unable to close the chasm; but at last the demijohn rose slowly and solemnly from the horizontal, the gulf gradually closed until, obtaining the old angle of forty-five degrees, the two dusty pieces of beefsteak once more stood sentry over the abyss. Prosecuting my observations along the upper surface, I next came to the proboscis, which suggested the idea of a Bologna sausage after a passage through a cotton-press. Along the upper part, the limits were invisible, so beautifully did it blend with the sable cheek on each side; but the lower part seemed to have been outside the press during the process, and therefore to have obtained unusual rotundity, thanks to which two nostrils appeared, which would, for size, have excited the envy of the best bred Arab that was ever foaled; and the division between them was nearly equal to that of the horse. I longed to hear her sneeze; it must have been something quite appallingly grand. Continuing my examination, I was forced to the conclusion that the poor delicate creature was bilious; for the dark eyes gleamed from their round yellow beds like pieces of cannel-coal set in a gum-cistus. The forehead was a splendid prairie of flat table-land, beyond which stretched a jungle of curly locks, like horse-hair ready picked for stuffing sofas, and being tied tightly round near the apex, the neck of the bottle was formed, and the demijohn complete.

While admiring this fascinating spot, its owner suddenly felt the urge to yawn. To achieve this, she had to tilt the demijohn nearly horizontal, relieving the pressure on the bottom. She used both hands to support her intellectual storage. Once this was done, a rose-colored gulf appeared, one that would have made even the bravest Quintus Curtius hesitate before taking the terrifying plunge. Time or battle had cleared the ivory obstructions in the center, but the sides of the gulf were terrifyingly iron-bound, capable of crushing even the hardest granite; to her, a cow’s shinbone would be as delicate as an oyster is to ordinary people. She indulged in this luxurious act for so long that I worried she might be suffering from the opposite of lockjaw, unable to close the gap. But eventually, the demijohn slowly and solemnly returned to a vertical position, the gulf gradually closed until, at the old angle of forty-five degrees, the two dusty pieces of beefsteak once again stood guard over the void. Continuing my observations along the surface, I came to the nose, which reminded me of a Bologna sausage after being through a cotton press. The upper part blended seamlessly into her dark cheek on each side, but the lower part seemed to have been outside the press during the process, making it unusually round, which resulted in two nostrils that would envy the best-bred Arab horse; the space between them was nearly as wide as that of a horse. I couldn't wait to hear her sneeze; it must have been something impressively grand. As I continued my examination, I concluded that the poor delicate creature looked bilious; her dark eyes gleamed from their round yellow sockets like pieces of cannel coal set in a gum-cistus. The forehead was a magnificent flat landscape, beyond which a jungle of curly hair stretched out, resembling horsehair ready to be used for stuffing sofas, and tightly tied near the top, formed the neck of the bottle, completing the demijohn.

STEWARDESS OF "THE LADY FRANKLIN"

STEWARDESS OF "THE LADY FRANKLIN"

STEWARDESS OF "THE LADY FRANKLIN"

Flight attendant of "The Lady Franklin"

I was very curious to see this twenty-five stone sylph in motion, and especially anxious to have an opportunity of examining the pedestals by which she was supported and set in motion. After a little patience, I was gratified to a certain extent, as the stately mass was summoned to her duties. By careful observation, I discovered the pedestals resembled flounders, out of which grew, from their centre, two cylinders, the ankles deeply imbedded therein, and in no way disturbing the smooth surface. All higher information was of course wrapt in the mystery of conjecture; but from the waddling gait and the shoulders working to and fro at every step, the concealed cylinders doubtless increased in size to such an extent, that the passing one before the other was a task of considerable difficulty; and if the motion was not dignified, it was imposingly slow, and seemed to call all the energies of the various members into action to accomplish its end. Even the demijohn rolled as if it were on a pivot, nodding grandly as the mighty stewardess of the "Franklin" proceeded to obey the summons. I watched her receding form, and felt that I had never before thoroughly realized the meaning of an "armsful of joy," and I could not but wonder who was the happy possessor of this great blessing.

I was really curious to see this twenty-five stone sylph in motion and especially eager to check out the pedestals supporting and setting her in motion. After a bit of waiting, I got to see a glimpse of it as the impressive figure was called to her duties. By carefully watching, I noticed that the pedestals looked like flounders, from which two cylinders emerged at their center, with her ankles deeply embedded in them without disturbing the smooth surface. Any deeper details were obviously wrapped in mystery, but from her waddling walk and the way her shoulders moved back and forth with every step, it was clear that the hidden cylinders likely expanded so much that moving one in front of the other was quite a challenge. While her movement wasn’t exactly dignified, it was impressively slow and seemed to require all her parts working together to achieve it. Even the demijohn rolled as if it was on a pivot, nodding majestically as the mighty stewardess of the "Franklin" responded to the call. I watched her walk away and realized I had never truly understood what “armsful of joy” meant, and I couldn’t help but wonder who was the fortunate person enjoying such a great blessing.

Ibrahim Pacha, when in England, was said to have had an intense desire to purchase two ladies, one aristocratic, the other horticultural, the solidity of these ladies being their great point of attraction in his estimation. Had he but seen my lovely stewardess, I am sure he would instantly have given up negotiations for both, could he thereby have hoped to obtain such a massive treasure as the "Sylph of the 'Franklin.'"

Ibrahim Pacha, while in England, was said to have an intense desire to buy two women, one from the aristocracy and the other a gardener, with their strong qualities being what attracted him the most. If he had only seen my beautiful stewardess, I’m sure he would have immediately abandoned discussions about both, if it meant he could hope to gain such a remarkable treasure as the "Sylph of the 'Franklin.'"


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Since I was there, General Cadwallader has taken the place into his own hands.


In case the expression is new to the reader, I beg to inform him that to "whittle" is to cut little chips of wood—if, when the fit comes on, no stick is available, the table is sometimes operated on.


I believe the plan of making the canal-boats in sections is original; but the idea of dragging them up inclines to avoid expenses of lockage, &c., is of old date, having been practised as far back as 1792, upon a canal in the neighbourhood of Colebrook Dale, where the boats were raised by stationary engines up two inclines, one of 207 feet, and the other of 126 feet. I believe this is the first instance of the adoption of this plan, and the engineers were Messrs. Reynolds and Williams. The American inclines being so much greater, the dividing the boat into sections appears to me an improvement.



CHAPTER IX.

Scenes Ashore and Afloat.




A trip on a muddy river, whose banks are fringed with a leafless forest resembling a huge store of Brobdignagian stable brooms, may be favourable to reflection; but, if description be attempted, there is danger lest the brooms sweep the ideas into the muddy water of dulness. Out of consideration therefore to the reader, we will suppose ourselves disembarked at Louisville, with the intention of travelling inland to visit the leviathan wonder—the would-be rival to Niagara,—yclept "The Mammoth Cave." Its distance from Louisville is ninety-five miles. There is no such thing as a relay of horses to be met with—at all events, it is problematical; therefore, as the roads were execrable, we were informed it would take us two long days, and our informant strongly advised us to go by the mail, which only employs twenty-one hours to make the ninety-five miles' journey. There was no help for it; so, with a sigh of sad expectation, I resigned myself to my fate, of which I had experienced a short foretaste on my way to Pittsburg. I then inquired what lions the town offered to interest a traveller. I found there was little in that way, unless I wished to go through the pig-killing, scalding, and cutting process again; but stomach and imagination rebelled at the bare thought of a second edition of the bloody scene, so I was fain to content myself with the novelty of the tobacco pressing; and, as tobacco is the favourite bonbon of the country, I may as well describe the process which the precious vegetable goes through ere it mingles with the human saliva.

A journey down a muddy river, with banks lined by a bare forest that looks like a massive supply of oversized brooms, might be good for deep thinking; however, if I try to describe it, the brooms might just sweep my thoughts into the dull, muddy waters. So, to be considerate of the reader, let’s imagine we've arrived in Louisville, planning to head inland to see the giant wonder—the supposed rival to Niagara—called "The Mammoth Cave." It’s ninety-five miles from Louisville. There’s no reliable way to get horses—at least, it’s uncertain—so since the roads were terrible, we were told it would take us two long days to reach our destination. Our informant strongly recommended taking the mail, which only takes twenty-one hours for the ninety-five-mile trip. We had no choice; so, with a sigh of resigned expectation, I accepted my fate, which I had already gotten a taste of on my way to Pittsburgh. I then asked what interesting things the town had to offer a traveler. I discovered there was little of interest, unless I wanted to go through the pig slaughtering, scalding, and butchering process again; but my stomach and imagination revolted at the thought of reliving that bloody scene. So instead, I settled for the novelty of tobacco pressing; and since tobacco is the favorite treat in the area, I might as well explain what this precious plant goes through before it mixes with human saliva.

A due admixture of whites and blacks assemble together, and, damping the tobacco, extract all the large stems and fibres, which are then carefully laid aside ready for export to Europe, there to be cooked up for the noses of monarchs, old maids, and all others who aspire to the honour and glory of carrying a box—not forgetting those who carry it in the waistcoat-pocket, and funnel it up the nose with a goose-quill. How beautifully simple and unanswerable is the oft-told tale, of the reply of a testy old gentleman who hated snuff as much as a certain elderly person is said to hate holy-water—when offered a pinch by an "extensive" young man with an elaborate gold-box. "Sir," said the indignant patriarch, "I never take the filthy stuff! If the Almighty had intended my nostrils for a dust-pan, he would have turned them the other way."—But I wander from the subject. We will leave the fibre to find its way to Europe and its noses, and follow the leaf to America and its mouths. In another apartment niggers and whites re-pick the fibres out more carefully, and then roll up the pure loaf in a cylindrical shape, according to the measure provided for the purpose. It is then taken to another apartment, and placed in duly prepared compartments under a strong screw-press, by which operation it is transformed from a loose cylinder to a well squashed parallelogram. It is hard work, and the swarthy descendants of Ham look as if they were in a vapour-bath, and doubtless bedew the leaf with superfluous heat.

A mix of white and Black workers come together, dampen the tobacco, and remove all the large stems and fibers, which are then carefully set aside for export to Europe, where they will be processed for the enjoyment of monarchs, old maids, and anyone else who takes pride in carrying a snuff box—not to mention those who keep it in their waistcoat pocket to snort it up their nose with a quill. How beautifully straightforward and undeniable is the well-known story of the grumpy old gentleman who despised snuff just like a certain elderly person is said to despise holy water—when offered a pinch by a flashy young man with an ornate gold box. “Sir,” the offended patriarch declared, “I never take that filthy stuff! If the Almighty had intended my nostrils to be a dustpan, He would have turned them the other way.”—But I'm getting off track. We'll leave the fibers to make their way to Europe and its noses and follow the leaf to America and its mouths. In another room, Black and white workers carefully pick out the fibers again and then roll the pure leaf into a cylindrical shape, following the designated measurements. Next, it's taken to another room and placed in specially prepared sections under a strong screw press, transforming it from a loose cylinder into a compact parallelogram. It’s hard work, and the dark-skinned descendants of Ham look like they’re in a steam room, likely sweating onto the leaf with excessive heat.

After the first pressing, it goes to a more artistic old negro, who, with two buckets of water—one like pea-soup, the other as dark as if some of his children had been boiled down in it—and armed with a sponge of most uninviting appearance, applies these liquids with most scientific touch, thereby managing to change the colour, and marble it, darken it, or lighten it, so as to suit the various tastes. This operation completed, and perspiring negroes screwing down frantically, it is forced into the box prepared for its reception, which is imbedded in a strong iron-bound outer case during the process, to prevent the more fragile one from bursting under the pressure. All this over, and the top fixed, a master-painter covers it with red and black paint, recording its virtues and its charms. What a pity it could not lie in its snug bed for ever! But, alas! fate and the transatlantic Anglo-Saxon have decreed otherwise. Too short are its slumbers, too soon it bursts again, to suffer fresh pressure under the molars of the free and enlightened, and to fall in filthy showers over the length and breadth of the land, deluging every house and every vehicle to a degree that must be seen to be believed, and filling the stranger with much wonder, but far more disgust. I really think it must be chewing tobacco which makes the Americans so much more restless, so much more like armadillos than any other nation. It often has excited my wonder, how the more intelligent and civilized portion of the community, who do not generally indulge in the loathsome practice, can reconcile themselves to the annoyance of it as kindly as they do. Habit and necessity are powerful masters.

After the first pressing, it goes to an artistic old Black man, who, with two buckets of water—one colored like pea soup, the other dark as if some of his children had been boiled in it—and armed with a sponge that looks pretty unappealing, applies these liquids with a very skilled touch. This way, he manages to change the color, marble it, darken it, or lighten it, to suit various tastes. Once this is done, and sweaty workers are cranking down frantically, it's squeezed into a box made for it, which is set inside a strong iron-bound outer case during the process to prevent the more delicate box from bursting under the pressure. After all this, and once the top is on, a master painter covers it with red and black paint, noting its qualities and charms. What a shame it can't just lie in its cozy bed forever! But, unfortunately, fate and the transatlantic Anglo-Saxon have decided differently. Its rest is too brief, and too soon it bursts again, to endure fresh pressure under the teeth of the free and enlightened, spilling in filthy showers across the land, flooding every house and every vehicle in a way that must be seen to be believed, leaving strangers both amazed and quite disgusted. I genuinely believe it must be the chewing tobacco that makes Americans so much more restless, more like armadillos than any other nation. It often puzzles me how the more intelligent and civilized part of society, who typically don't partake in this disgusting habit, can tolerate it so kindly. Habit and necessity are powerful teachers.

Having finished this exhibition—which, by the way, kept me sneezing all the time—I went next to see a steam sawing, planing, and fitting mill. Labour being very expensive, these establishments are invaluable here; such an establishment as I saw could supply, from the raw wood in logs, all the doors and window-frames of "Stafford House" in three days, barring the polish and paint. If Mr. Cubitt is not up to this machinery, this hint may be the means of making his fortune double itself in "quarter-less no time."[M] As we knew that our journey to-morrow must be inexpressibly tedious, we beat an early retreat, requesting a cup of hot tea or coffee might be ready for us half an hour before our departure. Poor simple creatures that we were, to expect such a thing! The free and enlightened get their breakfast after being two hours en route, and can do without anything before starting—ergo, we must do the same: thus, though there were literally servants enough in the house to form a substantial militia regiment, a cup of tea was impossible to be obtained for love or money. All we had for it was to bury our disappointment in sleep.

Having wrapped up this exhibition—which, by the way, had me sneezing the whole time—I then went to check out a steam-powered sawing, planing, and fitting mill. Since labor is quite costly, these operations are incredibly valuable here; a facility like the one I saw could produce all the doors and window frames for "Stafford House" from raw timber in just three days, excluding polish and paint. If Mr. Cubitt isn't familiar with this kind of machinery, this suggestion might help him double his fortune in no time at all. As we knew our journey the next day would be incredibly dull, we decided to leave early, asking if a cup of hot tea or coffee could be ready for us thirty minutes before we set off. Poor naive souls that we were, to think that would happen! The free and enlightened tend to have their breakfast two hours into their journey and can go without anything until then—therefore, we had to do the same: despite there being more than enough servants in the house to form a decent militia, getting a cup of tea was impossible, no matter the price. All we could do was bury our disappointment in sleep.

Soon after three the next morning we were roused from our slumbers, and, finishing our toilet, cheered our insides with an unadulterated draught from the Ohio. All outside the door was dark, cheerless, solitary, and still. Presently the silence was broken by some violent puffs from a penny trumpet. "Dat's de mayle, massa," said a nigger in the hall, accompanying his observation with a mysterious grin, evidently meant to convey the idea, "You'll have enough of her before you've done." Up she came to the door—I believe, by custom if not by grammar, a man-of-war and a mail-coach are shes—a heavy, lumbering machine, with springs, &c., apparently intended for scaling the Rocky Mountains. The inside was about three feet broad and five feet long, and was intended for the convenience (?) of nine people, the three who occupied the centre seat having a moveable leather strap to support their backs. Outside, there was one seat by the coachman; and if the correspondence was not great, three more might sit behind the coachman, in all the full enjoyment of a splendidly cramped position. The sides of the carriage were made of leather, and fitted with buttons, for the purpose of opening in summer. Being a nasty drizzling morning, we got inside, with our two servants, and found we had it all to ourselves. "I am sure this is comfortable enough," observed my companion, who was one of the mildest and most contented of human beings. "Too good to last long," thought I.

Soon after three the next morning, we were awakened from our sleep and, after getting ready, refreshed ourselves with a pure drink from the Ohio. Outside the door was dark, gloomy, lonely, and quiet. Suddenly, the silence was interrupted by some loud blasts from a cheap trumpet. "That's the mail, sir," said a black man in the hallway, flashing a mysterious grin that clearly suggested, "You'll have plenty of her before you're done." Up it came to the door—I suppose, by tradition if not by grammar, a warship and a mail coach are both referred to as "she"—a heavy, clunky vehicle with springs, seemingly built for climbing the Rocky Mountains. The interior was about three feet wide and five feet long and was supposed to accommodate nine people, with the three in the middle seat having a movable leather strap to support their backs. Outside, there was one seat for the driver, and if the mail wasn't too much, three more could squeeze in behind the driver, all in the full experience of a magnificently cramped position. The sides of the carriage were made of leather and had buttons for opening in the summer. Since it was a dreary, drizzly morning, we climbed inside with our two servants and discovered we had it all to ourselves. "I’m sure this is comfortable enough," remarked my companion, who was one of the gentlest and most content individuals around. "Too good to last long," I thought.

The penny trumpet sounds, and off we go—not on our journey, but all over the town to the different hotels, to pick up live freight. I heartily hoped they might all oversleep themselves that morning. Alas! no such luck. Jonathan and a weasel are two animals that are very rarely caught napping. Passengers kept coming in until we were six, and "comfortable enough" became a misnomer. A furious blast of the tin tube, with a few spicy impromptu variations, portended something important, and, as we pulled up, we saw it was the post-office; but, murder of murders! we saw four more passengers! One got up outside; another was following; Jarvey stopped him, with—"I guess there aint no room up here for you; the mail's a-coming here." The door opened,—the three damp bodkins in line commenced their assault,—the last came between my companion and myself, I could not see much of him, it was so dark; but—woe is me!--there are other senses besides sight, and my unfortunate nostrils drank in a most foetid polecatty odour, ever increasing as he drew nearer and nearer. Room to sit there was none; but, at the blast of the tube, the rattle over the pitty pavement soon shook the obnoxious animal down between us, squeezing the poisonous exhalation out of him at each successive jolt. As dawn rose, we saw he was a German, and doubtless the poor fellow was very hard-up for money, and had been feeding for some time past on putrid pork. As for his hide and his linen, it would have been an unwarrantable tax upon his memory to have asked him when they had last come in contact with soap and water. My stomach felt like the Bay of Biscay in an equinoctial gale, and I heartily wished I could have dispensed with the two holes at the bottom of my nose. I dreaded asking how far he was going; but another passenger—under the influence of the human nosegay he was constrained to inhale—summed up the courage to pop the question, and received a reply which extinguished in my breast the last flickering ray of Hope's dim taper—"Sair, I vosh go to Nashveele." Only conceive the horror of being squashed into such a neighbour for twenty-one long hours, and over a road that necessarily kept jerking the unwashed and polecatty head into your face ten times in a minute! Who that has bowels of compassion but must commiserate me in such "untoward circumstances?"

The penny trumpet sounds, and off we go—not on our journey, but all around town to different hotels to pick up passengers. I really hoped they would all oversleep that morning. Unfortunately, that didn’t happen. Jonathan and a weasel are two creatures that very rarely get caught napping. Passengers kept arriving until we had six, and "comfortable enough" became a joke. A loud blast from the tin horn, accompanied by some spicy, improvised variations, indicated something important, and as we pulled up, we saw it was the post office; but, oh no! We spotted four more passengers! One got on outside; another was following; the driver stopped him with, "I guess there ain't no room up here for you; the mail's coming." The door opened—the three wet individuals in line began their intrusion—the last one squeezed between my companion and me, and I couldn't see much of him because it was so dark; but—oh no!—there are other senses besides sight, and my unfortunate nose picked up a terrible skunk-like smell, which got stronger as he got closer. There was no room to sit, but at the horn's blast, the rattle over the bumpy pavement soon jostled the offensive individual down between us, forcing the foul smell out of him with each bump. As dawn broke, we saw he was German, and surely the poor guy was struggling financially, having been living on rotten pork for a while. As for his skin and clothes, it would have been too much to ask when they last got touched by soap and water. My stomach felt like the Bay of Biscay during a storm, and I really wished I could do without the two holes at the bottom of my nose. I dreaded asking how far he was going; but another passenger—under the influence of the unpleasant aroma he had to breathe in—gathered the courage to ask, and received an answer that extinguished the last flicker of hope in my heart—"Sir, I am going to Nashville." Just imagine the horror of being squished next to such a neighbor for twenty-one long hours, over a road that kept jolting the dirty, skunk-like head into your face ten times per minute! Who has any compassion but must feel sorry for me in such "unfortunate circumstances?"

Although we had left the hotel at four, it was five before we left the town, and about seven before we unpacked for breakfast, nine miles out of town. The stench of my neighbour had effectually banished all idea of eating or drinking from my mind; so I walked up and down outside, smoking my cigar, and thinking "What can I do?" At last, the bright idea struck me—I will get in next time with my cigar; what if we are nine herrings in the barrel?—everybody smokes in this country—they won't object—and I think, by keeping the steam well up, I can neutralize a little of the polecat. So when the time came for starting, I got my big cigar-case, &c., out on my knees—as getting at your pockets, when once packed, was impossible—and entering boldly with my weed at high pressure, down I sat. We all gradually shook into our places. Very soon a passenger looked me steadily in the face; he evidently was going to speak; I quailed inwardly, dreading he was going to object to the smell of smoke. Oh, joyous sight! a cigar appeared between his fingers, and the re-assuring words came forth—"A light, sir, if you please." I never gave one more readily in my life. Gradually, passenger after passenger produced cigars; the aroma filled the coach, and the fragrance of the weed triumphed over the foetor of the polecat. Six insides out of nine hard at it, and four of them with knock-me-down Virginia tobacco, the single human odour could not contend against such powerful odds; as well might a musquito sneeze against thunder. I always loved a cigar; but here I learnt its true value in a desperate emergency.

Although we had left the hotel at four, it was five before we finally left the town, and about seven before we unpacked for breakfast, nine miles outside of town. The smell from my neighbor had completely killed any urge for food or drink in my mind, so I walked back and forth outside, smoking my cigar and thinking, "What can I do?" Finally, a brilliant idea hit me—I would take my cigar with me next time; who cares if we're all crammed together? Everyone smokes in this country—they won't mind, and I think by keeping the steam up, I can mask some of the stench. So when it was time to leave, I pulled out my big cigar case while kneeling, since getting to my pockets once everything was packed was impossible—and boldly walked in with my cigar lit. I sat down. We all gradually settled into our seats. Soon, a passenger looked me straight in the face; he clearly was about to say something. I felt a wave of dread, fearing he was going to complain about the smoke. Oh, what a relief! A cigar appeared between his fingers, and the reassuring words came out—"A light, sir, if you please." I handed it over without a moment’s hesitation. Gradually, one by one, more passengers pulled out their cigars; the aroma filled the coach, and the scent of the smoke overcame the terrible smell. Six out of the nine passengers were smoking away, and four of them with strong Virginia tobacco—the single human smell couldn’t compete against such powerful odds; it was like a mosquito trying to stand up to thunder. I’ve always loved a cigar, but here I really learned its true worth in a desperate situation.

On we went, puffing, pumping, and jolting, till at last we came to a stand on the banks of a river. As there was a reasonable probability of the mail shooting into the stream on its descent, we were told to get out, on doing which we found ourselves pleasantly situated about a foot deep in mud; the mail got down safe into an open ferry-boat with two oars, and space for passengers before the horses or behind the coach. The ferry was but for a few minutes, and we then had to ascend another bank of mud, at the top of which we retook our seats in the mail, bringing with us in the aggregate, about a hundredweight of fine clay soil, with which additional cargo we continued our journey. One o'clock brought us to Elizabeth Town, and dinner; the latter was very primitive, tough, and greasy.

On we went, puffing, pumping, and jolting, until we finally stopped on the banks of a river. Since there was a good chance that the mail would end up in the water, we were told to get out. When we did, we found ourselves happily about a foot deep in mud. The mail safely got into an open ferry-boat with two oars, and there was space for passengers either in front of the horses or behind the coach. The ferry ride was short, and then we had to climb up another bank of mud, at the top of which we took our seats back in the mail, bringing along about a hundred pounds of fine clay soil that we collected as extra cargo for our journey. At one o'clock, we arrived in Elizabeth Town for dinner; the meal was very basic, tough, and greasy.

Once more we entered our cells, and continued our route, the bad road getting worse and worse, rarely allowing us to go out of a walk. Two of our fellow-passengers managed to make themselves as offensive as possible. They seemed to be travelling bagmen of the lowest class. Conversation they had none, but by way of appearing witty, they kept repeating over and over again some four or five stories, laughing at one another's tales, which were either blasphemous or beastly—so much so, that I would most willingly have compounded for two more human polecats in lieu of them. I must say, that although all classes mix together in public conveyances, this was the first time I had ever found people conduct themselves in so disgusting a manner. We soon came to another river, and getting out, enjoyed a second mud walk, bringing in with us as before a rich cargo of clay soil; and after a continuous and increasing jolting, which threatened momentary and universal dislocation, we arrived, after a drive of twenty-one hours, at our journey's end—i.e., at "Old Bell's," so called from the proprietor of the inn. Here we were to pass the night, or rather the remainder of it, the mail going on to Nashville, and taking our foetid bodkin on with it. But, alas! the two more disagreeable passengers before alluded to remained, as they had suddenly made up their minds to stay and visit the Mammoth Cave.

Once again, we returned to our compartments and continued on our route, the bad road getting worse, barely allowing us to move faster than a walk. Two of our fellow travelers made themselves as unpleasant as possible. They seemed to be the lowest kind of traveling salesmen. They didn’t engage in conversation, but to seem funny, they kept repeating a few stories over and over, laughing at each other’s tales, which were either blasphemous or disgusting—so much so that I would have gladly traded them for two more human skunks. I must say, although people from all walks of life share public transportation, this was the first time I encountered such appalling behavior. We soon came to another river and got out, enjoying a second muddy walk, bringing with us the same rich load of clay soil; and after constant and increasing jolting, which threatened to dislocate us at any moment, we arrived after twenty-one hours of travel at our destination—i.e., "Old Bell's," named after the inn’s owner. Here we were to spend the night, or what was left of it, as the mail continued on to Nashville, taking our stinky baggage with it. But, unfortunately, the two previously mentioned disagreeable passengers decided to stay behind and visit Mammoth Cave.

Old Bell is a venerable specimen of seventy odd years of age, and has been here, I believe, half a century nearly. One of his daughters, I am told, is very pretty. She is married to a senator of the United States, and keeps one of the most agreeable houses in Washington. The old gentleman is said to be worth some money, but he evidently is determined to die in harness. As regularly as the mail arrives, about one in the morning, so regularly does he turn out and welcome the passengers with a glass of mixed honey, brandy, and water. The beverage and the donor reminded me forcibly of "Old Crerer," and the "Athole Brose," with which he always welcomed those who visited him in his Highland cottage. Having got beds to ourselves—after repeated requests to roost two in a nest, as the house was small—I soon tumbled into my lair, and in the blessed forgetfulness of sleep the miseries of the day became mingled with the things that were. The next morning, after breakfast, we got a conveyance to take the party over to the Cave, a distance of seven miles. One may really say there is no road. For at least one half of the way there is nothing but a rugged track of rock and roots of trees, ever threatening the springs of the carriage and the limbs of the passenger with frightful fractures. However, by walking over the worst of it, you protect the latter and save the former, thus rendering accidents of rare occurrence.

Old Bell is a respected gentleman of around seventy years, and he's been here, I believe, for almost half a century. I hear that one of his daughters is quite attractive. She's married to a U.S. senator and hosts one of the most pleasant homes in Washington. The old man is reportedly worth a good amount of money, but he clearly intends to keep working until the end. Just as consistently as the mail arrives, around one in the morning, he also gets up to greet the passengers with a drink made of mixed honey, brandy, and water. The drink and the person serving it reminded me strongly of "Old Crerer" and the "Athole Brose," which he always offered to visitors in his Highland cottage. After we managed to get separate beds for ourselves—after several requests to share, since the house was small—I quickly settled into my bed, and in the blissful forgetfulness of sleep, the day's troubles faded into the background. The next morning, after breakfast, we got a ride to take the group over to the Cave, a distance of seven miles. It’s fair to say there’s no real road. For at least half the trip, there's just a rough path of rocks and tree roots, always threatening to damage the carriage and injure the passengers. However, by walking over the worst parts, you protect both the carriage and the passengers, making accidents quite rare.

The hotel is a straggling building, chiefly ground floor, and with a verandah all round. The air is deliriously pure, and in summer it must be lovely. It is situated on a plateau, from the extremity of which the bank descends to the Green River. On both sides is the wild forest, and round the giant trunks the enamoured vine twines itself with the affectionate pertinacity of a hungry boa-constrictor, and boars its head in triumph to the topmost branches. But vegetable life is not like a Venus who, "when unadorned, is adorned the most;" and, the forest having cast off its summer attire, presents an uninviting aspect in the cold nudity of winter. When the virgin foliage of spring appears, and ripens into the full verdure of summer, the shade of these banks must be delicious; the broad-leaved and loving vine extending its matrimonial embrace as freely and universally through the forest as Joe Smith and his brethren do theirs among the ladies at the Salt Lake; and when autumn arrives, with those gorgeous glowing tints unknown to the Old World, the scene must be altogether lovely; then the admirer of nature, floating between the banks on the light-green bosom of the stream below, and watching the ever-changing tints, as the sun dropped softly into his couch in the west, would enjoy a feast that memory might in vain try to exhaust itself in recalling.

The hotel is a sprawling building, mostly one level, with a verandah all around. The air is incredibly fresh, and it must be beautiful in the summer. It’s located on a plateau, where the bank slopes down to the Green River. Wild forests surround it, and the thick vines wrap around the massive trunks with the determined cling of a hungry boa, proudly reaching up to the highest branches. But plant life isn't like a Venus who, "when unadorned, is adorned the most;" in winter, after shedding its summer leaves, the forest looks quite uninviting in its cold bare state. When the fresh green leaves of spring emerge and grow into the rich greenery of summer, the shade by the riverbanks must be delightful; the broad, loving vines spreading their embrace through the forest just as freely as Joe Smith and his followers do among the women at Salt Lake; and when autumn comes, with its stunning colors unseen in the Old World, the scene must be absolutely beautiful; then the nature lover, drifting between the banks on the light-green surface of the stream below and watching the constantly changing colors as the sun gently sets in the west, would enjoy a feast that memory would struggle to fully capture.

There are guides appointed who provide lanterns and torches for visitors who wish to examine the Mammoth Cave; and its interior is such a labyrinth, that, without their aid, the task would be a dangerous one. Rough clothing is provided at the hotel, the excursion being one of scramble and difficulty.

There are guides available who supply lanterns and flashlights for visitors wanting to explore Mammoth Cave; its interior is such a maze that, without their help, the journey would be risky. Sturdy clothing is available at the hotel, as the excursion involves climbing and challenges.

Thus prepared, we started on our exploring expedition, passing at the entry the remnants of old saltpetre works, which were established here during the struggle at New Orleans. The extent of this cave would render a detail tedious, as there are comparatively few objects of interest. The greatest marvel is a breed of small white fish without eyes, several of which are always to be seen. Like all similar places, it varies in size in the most arbitrary manner. At one minute you are struggling for space, and suddenly you emerge upon a Gothic-looking hall, full of gracefully pendent stalactites. Again you proceed along corridors, at one time lofty, at another threatening your head, if pride do not give way to humility. Then you come to rivers, of which there are two. At one time you are rowing under a magnificent vault, and then, anon, you are forced to lie flat down in the boat, or leave your head behind you, as you float through a passage, the roof whereof grazes the gunwale of the boat. My guide informed me that there was a peculiarity in these rivers nobody could satisfactorily account for, viz., that the more it rained, the lower these waters fell. I expect the problem resembled that which is attributed to King Charles, viz., "How it was, that if a dead fish was put into a vessel full of water it immediately overflowed, but that, if a live fish was put in, it did not do so;" and I have some suspicion the solution is the same in both cases. Among other strange places, is one which rejoices in the name of "Fat Man's Misery." At one minute the feet get fixed as in the stocks; at another, the upper portion of the body is called upon to make a right angle with the lower; even then, a projecting point of the rock above will sometimes prod you upon the upturned angle, in endeavouring to save which, by a too rapid act of humility, you knock all the skin off the more vulnerable knee. Emerging from this difficulty, and, perhaps, rising too hastily, a crack on the head closes your eyes, filling them with a vision of forked lightning. Recovering from this agreeable sensation, you find a gap like the edge of a razor, in going through which, you feel the buttons of your waistcoat rubbing against your backbone. It certainly would be no bad half-hour's recreation to watch a rotund Lord Mayor, followed by a court of aldermen to match, forcing their way through this pass after a turtle dinner.

Thus prepared, we started on our exploration expedition, passing by the remnants of old saltpeter works that were established here during the battle at New Orleans. Describing the extent of this cave would take too long because there are relatively few interesting features. The most remarkable sight is a breed of small white fish without eyes, which are usually visible. Like all similar environments, the cave's size changes in a random way. One minute you’re struggling for space, and suddenly you find yourself in a Gothic-looking hall filled with beautiful hanging stalactites. Then you continue along corridors that are sometimes high and sometimes so low that you have to be careful not to bump your head. After that, you encounter two rivers. At one point, you are rowing beneath an impressive vault, and then, soon after, you have to lie flat in the boat or risk leaving your head behind as you glide through a passage where the ceiling grazes the boat's edge. My guide told me there was a strange characteristic about these rivers that no one could explain satisfactorily: the more it rained, the lower the water level dropped. I suspect the issue is similar to one attributed to King Charles, which was, "How is it that if a dead fish is placed in a vessel full of water it overflows immediately, but if a live fish is added, it doesn't?" I have a hunch the answer is the same in both cases. Among other unusual places is one called "Fat Man's Misery." One moment your feet get stuck like they’re in stocks; the next, your upper body has to bend at a right angle to your lower body; even then, a protruding rock above may poke you at the awkward angle, and in trying to avoid that by quickly bending, you might scrape all the skin off your sensitive knee. After getting through this hassle, and maybe standing up too quickly, you get hit on the head, which makes your vision flash with sparks. Once you recover from that delightful feeling, you find a narrow gap to squeeze through, feeling the buttons of your waistcoat rubbing against your back. It would certainly be amusing to watch a plump Lord Mayor, along with a matching court of aldermen, trying to squeeze through this passage after a turtle dinner.

The last place I shall mention is the one which, to me, afforded the greatest pleasure: it is a large hall, in which, after being placed in a particular position, the guide retires to a distance, taking with him all the lights; and knowing by experience what portion of them to conceal, bids you, when he is ready, look overhead. In a few seconds it has the appearance of the sky upon a dark night; but, as the eye becomes accustomed to the darkness, small spots are seen like stars; and they keep increasing till the vaulted roof has the appearance of a lovely star-light night. I never saw a more pleasing or perfect illusion. It would be difficult to estimate correctly the size of the Mammoth Cave. The American gazetteers say it extends ten or twelve miles, and has lateral branches, which, altogether, amount to forty miles. It is, I imagine, second in size only to the Cacuhuainilpa, in Mexico, which, if the accounts given are accurate, would take half a dozen such as the Mammoth inside. I fear it is almost superfluous to inform the reader, that the Anglo-Saxon keeps up his unenviable character for disfiguring every place he visits; and you consequently see the names of Smith, Brown, Snooks, &c., smoked on the rocks in all directions—an appropriate sooty record of a barbarous practice.[N]

The last place I want to mention is the one that brought me the most joy: it's a large hall where, after being positioned in a specific spot, the guide steps back, taking all the lights with him. He knows from experience which lights to hide and tells you to look up when he's ready. In a few seconds, it looks like the sky on a dark night; but as your eyes adjust to the darkness, you start to see tiny spots like stars, which keep appearing until the vaulted ceiling looks like a beautiful starry night. I've never seen a more delightful or convincing illusion. It's hard to accurately gauge the size of Mammoth Cave. American gazetteers say it stretches ten to twelve miles and has side branches that amount to a total of about forty miles. I believe it’s only second in size to the Cacuhuainilpa in Mexico, which, if the reports are correct, could fit six Mammoth Caves inside it. I find it almost unnecessary to tell the reader that the Anglo-Saxon continues to earn his infamous reputation for ruining every place he visits; as a result, you see names like Smith, Brown, Snooks, etc., scratched into the rocks everywhere—an apt, sooty reminder of this barbaric practice.[N]


Having enjoyed two days in exploring this "gigantic freak of Nature," we commenced our return about half-past four in the afternoon, so as to get over the break-neck track before dark. Old Bell[O] welcomed us as usual with his honey, brandy, and water. He then prepared us some dinner, as we wished to snatch a few hours' sleep before commencing our return to Louisville, with its twenty-one hours of pleasure. About half-past ten at night, a blast in the breeze, mixed with a confused slushy sound, as sixteen hoofs plashed in the mud, rang the knell in our ears, "Your time has come!" I anxiously looked as the mail pulled up in the middle of the road opposite to the door—they always allow the passengers the privilege of wading through the mud to the door of the inn—to see if by any chance it was empty, having been told that but few people comparatively travelled the back route—no wonder, if they could help it. Alas! the steam on the window announced, with fatal certainty, some humanities inside. The door opened; out they came, one, two, three, four. It was a small coach, with three seats, having only space for two persons on each, thus leaving places inside for my friend and myself. "Any room outside, there?"

After spending two days checking out this "massive wonder of Nature," we started our journey back around 4:30 in the afternoon to get over the dangerous path before it got dark. Old Bell[O] greeted us as always with his honey, brandy, and water. He then made us dinner since we wanted to grab a few hours of sleep before heading back to Louisville, with its twenty-one hours of fun. Around 10:30 p.m., a noise in the breeze, mixed with a messy sloshing sound from sixteen hooves splashing in the mud, echoed in our ears, "Your time has come!" I eagerly looked as the mail vehicle pulled up in front of the door—they always let passengers wade through the mud to the inn's entrance—to see if by some chance it was empty, having heard that not many people traveled the back route, and who could blame them? Unfortunately, the steam on the window confirmed, with grim certainty, that there were people inside. The door opened; out came one, two, three, four. It was a small coach with three seats, only enough space for two people on each, leaving room inside for my friend and me. "Any room outside?"

"Room for one, sir!"

"Space for one, sir!"

There was no help for it, and we were therefore obliged to leave one servant behind, to follow next night.

There was no other option, so we had to leave one servant behind to follow the next night.

Horses changed, honey-toddy all drank, in we got into the centre seat. "What is this all round?" "Thick drugget, sir; they nail it round in winter to keep the cold out."—Thank Heaven, it is only nailed at the bottom. Suffocation began; down goes my window. Presently a sixteen-stone kind of overgrown Pickwickian "Fat Boy," sitting opposite me, exclaims aloud, with a polar shudder, "Ugh! it's very cold!" and finding I was inattentive, he added, "Don't you find it very cold?" "Me, sir? I'm nearly fainting from heat," I replied; and then, in charity, I lent him a heavy full-sized Inverness plaid, in which he speedily enveloped his fat carcass. What with the plaids, and his five inches deep of fat, his bones must have been in a vapour bath. The other vis-à-vis was a source of uneasiness to me on a different score. He kept up a perpetual expectorating discharge; and, as my open window was the only outlet, and it did not come that way, I naturally felt anxious for my clothes. Daylight gradually dawned upon the scene, and then the ingenuity of my friend was made manifest in a way calculated to move any stomach not hardened by American travelling. Whenever he had expressed the maximum quantity of juice from the tobacco, the drugget lining was moved sufficiently for him to discharge his cargo against the inside of the carriage; after which, the drugget was replaced, and the effect of the discharge concealed thereby. This drugget lining must have been invaluable to him; for upon another occasion, it did duty for a pocket-handkerchief. I must say, that when I saw the otherwise respectable appearance of the culprit, his filthy practices astounded me. Behind us were two gentlemen who were returning to Louisville, and whom we found very agreeable.

Horses changed, and everyone had a drink as we settled into the center seat. "What's this all around?" "Thick fabric, sir; they nail it down in winter to keep the cold out."—Thank goodness, it’s only nailed at the bottom. I started to feel suffocated, so I rolled down my window. Soon, a large guy sitting across from me, kind of a very overweight Pickwickian "Fat Boy," exclaimed with a shiver, "Ugh! it's freezing!" Noticing I wasn't paying attention, he added, "Aren't you cold?" "Me? I'm almost fainting from heat," I replied, and out of kindness, I lent him my heavy Inverness plaid, which he quickly wrapped around his bulky body. Between the plaid and his five inches of fat, he must have felt like he was in a steam room. The other person across from me made me uneasy for a different reason. He constantly spat, and since my open window was the only exit and it didn’t come that way, I was naturally worried about my clothes. As daylight broke, my friend’s cleverness became clear in a way that would unsettle anyone not used to traveling in America. Whenever he finished sucking all the juice from his tobacco, he would shift the fabric lining just enough to spit inside the carriage, then replace the fabric to hide what he did. That lining must have been super useful for him; on another occasion, he even used it as a handkerchief. I must say, when I saw how the otherwise respectable guy looked, his disgusting habits shocked me. Behind us were two gentlemen heading back to Louisville, and we found them quite pleasant.

We stopped for breakfast at a wayside pot-house sort of place; but, before feasting, we wanted to wash ourselves. The conveniences for that purpose were a jug, a basin, and a piece of soap, on a bench in the open court, which, as it was raining pretty smartly, was a very ingenious method of dissuasion, particularly as your pocket-handkerchief, or the sleeve of your shirt, had to supply the place of a towel. The meal was as dissuasive as the washing arrangements, and I was glad when the trumpet summoned us to coach. I made an effort to sleep, for which purpose I closed my eyes, but in vain; however, the expectorating vis-à-vis, who was also a chilly bird, thought he had caught me napping, and said to his fat neighbour,—"I say, the old gentleman's asleep, pull up the window." The fat 'un did so, and I kept perfectly quiet. In a few minutes I began to breathe heavily, and then, awaking as it were with a groan, I complained of suffocation, and, dashing down the window, poked out my head and panted for fresh air: they were very civil all the rest of the journey, and never asked for the window to be shut again. In the course of the day, I found out that the fat boy opposite was connected with a circus company, and from him I gleaned something of their history, which I hope may not be uninteresting to the reader.

We stopped for breakfast at a roadside diner, but before we could eat, we wanted to wash up. The washing facilities consisted of a jug, a basin, and a bar of soap, all set on a bench in the open courtyard. Since it was raining quite a bit, this was a pretty clever way to discourage us, especially since we had to use our pocket handkerchiefs or the sleeve of our shirts as towels. The meal was just as unappealing as the washing setup, and I was relieved when the trumpet called us back to the coach. I tried to sleep by closing my eyes, but it didn't work. However, the guy across from me, who was also freezing, thought I was asleep and said to his chubby friend, "Hey, the old guy's out cold, pull up the window." The fat guy did, and I stayed completely still. A few minutes later, I started breathing heavily and then, as if waking up with a grunt, I complained about feeling suffocated. I slammed down the window, poked my head out, and gasped for fresh air. They were really nice for the rest of the trip and never asked to close the window again. Throughout the day, I learned that the chubby guy across from me was part of a circus company, and from him, I gathered some of their story, which I hope will be interesting for the reader.

Each company has a puffer, or advertiser, who is sent on a week before the company, to get bills printed, and see them posted up and distributed to the best advantage, in the places at which the company intend to perform. This was the fat boy's occupation, and for it he received eight pounds a month and his travelling expenses.

Each company has a promoter, or advertiser, who is sent out a week before the company to get flyers printed and ensure they are posted and distributed effectively in the locations where the company plans to perform. This was the fat boy's job, and for it, he earned eight pounds a month plus his travel expenses.

His company consisted of seventy-five bipeds and one hundred and twenty-five quadrupeds. Of the bipeds, twelve were performers, two being women; the pay varied from sixteen pounds a month to the chief Amazonian lady, down as low as five pounds a month to the least efficient of the corps. They work all the year round, sucking their cents from the North in summer, and from the South in winter. They carry everything with them, except it may be fuel and provisions. Each has his special duty appointed. After acting at night they retire to their tents to sleep, and the proper people take the circus-tent down, and start at once for the next place they are to appear at; the performers and their tent-men rise early in the morning, and start so as to reach the ground about eleven; they then rest and prepare, so as to be ready, after the people of the village have dined, to give their first performance; then they rest and refresh ready for their evening repetition. Some companies used to make their own gas, but experience has proved that wax-lights are sweeter and cheaper in the long run, so gas making is nearly exploded. After this second performance they retire to rest; the circus tent-men strike and pack the tent, then start off for the next place of exhibition, the actors and their tents following as before mentioned: thus they go on throughout the year, bipeds and quadrupeds scarcely ever entering a house.

His crew included seventy-five people and one hundred twenty-five animals. Among the people, twelve were performers, two of whom were women; their pay ranged from sixteen pounds a month for the lead Amazonian lady to as little as five pounds a month for the least skilled performer. They work all year round, earning their money in the North during summer and the South in winter. They bring everything with them, except maybe fuel and food. Each person has a specific role assigned to them. After performing at night, they go back to their tents to sleep, while the right people take down the circus tent and head to the next location. The performers and their crew wake up early in the morning to arrive at the new site around eleven; they then rest and prepare to be ready to perform after the local villagers have eaten lunch. After that, they take a break to get ready for their evening show. Some companies used to make their own gas, but experience has shown that wax lights are better and cheaper in the long run, so gas production has almost fallen out of use. After the second performance, they go to rest; the circus crew takes down and packs up the tent before leaving for the next stop, with the performers and their tents following as mentioned before. This is how they operate throughout the year, with people and animals rarely going inside a house.

There are numbers of these circus companies in the States, of which the largest is the one to which Van Amburgh is attached, and which, the fat boy told me, is about three times the size of his own—Van Amburgh taking always upwards of a dozen cages of his wild beasts. The work, he says, is very hard, but the money comes in pretty freely, which I can readily believe, as the bump of Inquisitiveness grows here with a luxuriance unknown elsewhere, and is only exceeded by its sister bump of Acquisitiveness, which two organs constitute audience and actors.

There are several circus companies in America, and the largest one is the one that Van Amburgh is part of. According to the fat boy, it's about three times bigger than his own—Van Amburgh always brings over a dozen cages of wild animals. He says the work is really tough, but the pay is pretty good, which I can easily believe, since curiosity grows here like nowhere else, and it's only outdone by its twin companion, greed, which together make up the audience and performers.

I give you no account of scenery on the road for two reasons: first, because there are no striking features to relieve the alternations of rude cultivation and ruder forest; and secondly, because in winter, Nature being despoiled of the life-giving lines of herbage and foliage, a sketch of dreariness would be all that truth could permit. I will therefore beg you to consider the twenty-one hours past, and Louisville reached in safety, where hot tea and "trimmings"—as the astute young Samivel hath it—soon restored us from the fatigues of a snail-paced journey, over the most abominable road a man can imagine, although it is the mail route between the flourishing towns of Louisville and Nashville. Should any ambitious spirit feel a burning desire to visit the Mammoth Cave, let me advise him to slake the said flame with the waters of Patience, and take for his motto—"I bide my time." Snoring has been the order of the day in these parts for many years; but the kettle-screaming roads of the North have at last disturbed the Southern slumberers, and, like giants refreshed, they are now working vigorously at their own kettle, which will soon hiss all the way from Louisville to Nashville. Till then, I say, Patience.—One of our companions in the stage very kindly offered to take us to the club, which is newly formed here, and which, if not large, is very comfortable. I mention this as one among the many instances which have occurred to me while travelling in this country, of the desire exhibited by the better classes to show civility and attention to any gentleman who they observe is a stranger among them.

I won’t describe the landscape along the route for two reasons: first, there’s nothing noteworthy to break up the dull stretches of rough farmland and even rougher forest; and second, in winter, with nature stripped of the life-giving greenery, all I could honestly share would be a portrayal of bleakness. So, I ask you to focus on the twenty-one hours that have passed, and that we safely reached Louisville, where hot tea and "trimmings"—as the clever young Samivel puts it—quickly revived us after the exhausting, slow-paced journey on the worst road you can imagine, even though it’s the main route between the thriving towns of Louisville and Nashville. If anyone feels a strong urge to visit Mammoth Cave, I suggest they cool that enthusiasm with a dose of patience and adopt the motto—"I bide my time." The snoring has dominated life in these parts for a long time; however, the noisy roads of the North have finally roused the sleepy folks in the South, and like refreshed giants, they’re now actively working on their own road, which will soon buzz all the way from Louisville to Nashville. Until then, I say, Patience. One of our fellow passengers kindly offered to take us to the newly formed club here, which, although small, is quite cozy. I mention this to highlight one of many instances during my travels in this country where I've seen the higher classes express courtesy and attentiveness to any gentleman they notice is a stranger among them.

The following morning we were obliged to continue our route, for which purpose it was necessary to embark two miles below the town, as the river was not high enough to allow the steamers to pass over a kind of bar called "The Falls." The road was one continuous bog of foot-deep mud, but that difficulty concerned the horses, and they got over it with perfect ease, despite the heavy drag. Once more we were floating down the Ohio, and, curiously enough, in, another "Franklin;" but she could not boast of such a massive cylindrical stewardess as her sister possessed. A host of people, as usual, were gathered round the bar, drinking, smoking, and arguing. Jonathan is "first-chop" at an argument. Two of them were hard at it as I walked up.

The next morning, we had to keep going on our journey, so we needed to get on board two miles below the town since the river wasn't high enough for the boats to get over a shallow area known as "The Falls." The road was just one long stretch of mud that was a foot deep, but that was more of a problem for the horses, and they managed it easily, despite the heavy load. Once again, we were drifting down the Ohio River, and interestingly enough, on another "Franklin," but this one didn't have as hefty a cylindrical stewardess as the other one did. A crowd of people, as usual, was hanging out by the bar, drinking, smoking, and debating. Jonathan is great at arguing. Two of them were really going at it as I walked up.

Says the Colonel—"I tell you, Major, it is more than a hundred miles."

Says the Colonel—"I’m telling you, Major, it's over a hundred miles."

Major—"Well, but I tell you, Colonel, it aint not no such thing."

Major—"Well, I’m telling you, Colonel, it’s not a thing."

Colonel—"But, sir'ree, I know it is."

Colonel—"But I assure you, I know it is."

Judge—"Well, Colonel, I tell you what it is; I reckon you're wrong."

Judge—"Well, Colonel, I’m telling you; I think you're mistaken."

Colonel—getting evidently excited—"No, sir'ree, I aint, and,"—holding out a brawny hand capable of scrunching a nine-pound shot into infant pap—"darned if I wont lay you, or any other gentleman, six Kentucky niggers to a julep I'm right."

Colonel—clearly getting excited—"No, sir, I'm not, and,"—holding out a strong hand capable of crushing a nine-pound shot into baby food—"I swear, I’ll bet you, or any other gentleman, six Kentucky guys to a julep that I'm right."

After offering these tremendous odds, he travelled his fiery eagle eyes from the major to the judge, and from the judge to the major, to ascertain which of them would have it; and as they were silent, he extended the radius of his glance to the company around, chucking his head, and looking out of the corner of his eye, from time to time, towards major and judge with a triumphant sneer, as much as to say, "I've fixed you, anyhow." The argument was over; whether the major and the judge were right about the distance, or not, I cannot decide; but if the bet, when accepted, had to be ratified in the grasp of the muscular hand which the colonel extended, they were decidedly right in not accepting it, as some painful surgical operation must have followed such a crushing and dislocation as his gripe inevitably portended. I would as soon have put my hand between the rollers of a cane-press.

After offering these amazing odds, he shot his intense eagle eyes from the major to the judge, and back again, trying to see who would take the bet. When neither said anything, he looked around at the rest of the group, cocking his head and glancing slyly at the major and the judge with a victorious smirk, as if to say, "I've got you figured out." The debate was done; whether the major and the judge were right about the distance is up for debate as well, but if accepting the bet meant shaking hands with the colonel’s strong grip, they were definitely smart for not taking it, since a painful surgical procedure would have likely followed such a crushing and dislocating grasp. I might as well have stuck my hand in a cane press.

The feeding arrangements for the humanities on board were, if disagreeable, sufficiently amusing once in a way. A table extends nearly the whole length of the gentlemen's saloon; on each side are ranged low wooden straight-back arm-chairs, of a breadth well suited for the ghost qui n'avait pas de quoi. But the unfortunate man who happened to be very well supplied therewith, ran considerable risk of finding the chair a permanent appendage. At the sound of the bell, all the seats being arranged opposite the respective places, the men rush forward and place themselves behind the said chairs, and, like true cavaliers, stand there till the ladies are seated. I was standing waiting among the rest, and getting impatient as time flew on. One lady had not yet arrived. At last the steward came with the said article on his arm, and having deposited her in the seat nearly opposite mine, at a knowing wink from him, a second steward sounded another bell, and the men dropped into their seats like magic. Soup having been already served, the spoons rattled away furiously. I was wondering who the lady—all females are ladies here—could be, for whom we had been so long waiting, and who had eventually come in with the steward, or gentleman—all men are gentlemen here—in so friendly a manner. She did not appear burdened with any refined manners, but, judge of my astonishment when, after she had got quit of her soup-plate and was waiting for her next helping, I observed the lady poking the point of her knife into a sweet dish near her, and sucking off the precious morsel she had captured, which interesting operation she kept repeating till her roast turkey arrived. There was an air of such perfect innocence about her, as she was employed in the sucking process, that you could not help feeling she was unconscious any eye fixed upon her could find her occupation offensive or extraordinary.

The dining setup for the humanities on board was, while unpleasant, occasionally entertaining. A long table stretched almost the entire length of the gentlemen's dining room; on each side, there were low wooden armchairs that were just the right size for someone without much to eat. But the unfortunate guy who actually did have enough to eat risked finding the chair a permanent attachment. When the bell rang, everyone lined up behind their chairs, and like true gentlemen, they stood there until the ladies were seated. I was among the crowd, growing impatient as time passed. One lady had still not arrived. Finally, the steward came in with her, placing her in a seat almost across from mine. With a knowing wink from him, a second steward rang another bell, and the men dropped into their seats like magic. Soup had already been served, and the spoons clattered away vigorously. I was curious about who the lady—since all women are considered ladies here—could be, for whom we had been waiting so long, and who had entered with the steward in such a friendly manner. She didn’t seem to have any refined manners, but I was astonished when, after finishing her soup, she started poking the tip of her knife into a sweet dish nearby and sucking off the morsels she’d captured. She kept at it until her roast turkey arrived. There was such a sense of innocence about her as she sucked on the food that you couldn’t help but think she was totally unaware that anyone watching her could find her actions offensive or unusual.

A gentleman seated near me next attracted my attention. They had helped him to a piece of meat the size and shape of a Holborn-hill paving-stone. How insulted he must be at having his plate filled in that way. Look! look! how he seizes vegetable after vegetable, building his plate all round, like a fortification, the junk of beef in the middle forming the citadel. It would have taken Napoleon a whole day to have captured such a fortress; but, remember, poor Napoleon did not belong to the nation that can "whip creation." See how Jonathan batters down bastion after bastion! Now he stops!--his piercing eye scrutinizes around!--a pie is seen! With raised body and lengthened arm, he pounces on it, and drags it under the guns of his fortress. Knives and forks are scarce—his own will do very well. A breach is made—the pastry parapet is thrown at the foot of the half-demolished citadel; spoons are not at hand, the knife plunges into the abyss, the fork follows—'tis a chicken pie—pillage ensues; all the white meat is captured, the dish is raised on high, from the horizontal it is turned to the "slantindicular," and the citadel is deluged in the shower. "Catch who can," is not confined to school-boys, I see. I was curious to witness the end of this attack, and, as he had enough to occupy his ivories for half an hour—if they did not give in before—I turned quietly to my own affairs, and began eating my dinner; but, curiosity is impatient. In a few minutes, I turned back to gaze on the fortress. By Jupiter Tonans! the plate lay before him, clean as if a cat had licked it; and, having succeeded in capturing another plate, he was organizing on this new plateau various battalions of sweets, for which he skirmished around with incomparable skill.

A guy sitting near me grabbed my attention next. They had given him a piece of meat that looked like a paving stone from Holborn Hill. He must have felt so insulted to have his plate filled like that. Look at him go! He's piling on vegetable after vegetable, creating a barricade around the junk of beef in the middle, which is like his fortress. It would take Napoleon a whole day to conquer such a stronghold; but remember, poor Napoleon didn’t belong to the nation that can "beat everyone." Watch how Jonathan knocks down one barrier after another! Now he pauses—his sharp eyes scan the area—wait, there's a pie! With his body leaning forward and his arm extended, he lunges for it and pulls it under his fortress's protection. Knives and forks are in short supply—his own will do just fine. A breach has been made—the pastry barrier falls at the base of the half-destroyed fortress; spoons are missing, so the knife goes in, and the fork follows—it's a chicken pie—looting begins; all the white meat is grabbed, the dish is lifted high, flipped from horizontal to at an angle, and the fortress is flooded with the spoils. "Catch if you can" isn't just for schoolboys, I see. I was curious to see how this attack would end, and since he had enough to keep his teeth busy for half an hour—if they didn’t give out first—I turned back to my own meal and started eating dinner; but curiosity doesn’t sit still. A few minutes later, I turned back to check on the fortress. By Jupiter Tonans! his plate was spotless, as if a cat had cleaned it; and having managed to snag another plate, he was setting up different piles of sweets on this new plateau, skillfully skirmishing around them.

The parade-ground being full, I expected to see an instant attack; but he was too knowing to be caught napping in that way. He looked around, and with a masterly eye scanned apples, oranges, and nuts. The two former he selected with great judgment; the latter he brought home in quantities sufficient to secure plenty of good ones. Then pouncing upon a pair of nutcrackers, and extending them like a chevaux-de-frise round his prizes, he began his onslaught upon the battalion of sweets before him.

The parade ground was packed, and I thought for sure there would be an immediate attack; but he was too smart to be caught off guard like that. He looked around and expertly surveyed the apples, oranges, and nuts. He picked the first two with great care and brought home enough nuts to make sure he got plenty of good ones. Then, grabbing a pair of nutcrackers and setting them up like a protective barrier around his loot, he started his assault on the army of sweets in front of him.

The great general now set seriously to work. Scarce had he commenced, when an innocent young man, who had finished his sweets and was meditating an attack on some nuts, espied the crackers lying idle before the gastronomic general, and said, "Will you lend me the nutcrackers, sir?" The great general raised his head, and gave the youth one of those piercing looks with which Napoleon used to galvanize all askers of impertinent questions. The youth, understanding the refusal conveyed in that terrible glance, had however enough courage to add, "You don't want them, sir!" This was too much to bear in silence; so he replied with awful distinctness, "But I reckon I shall, sir!" Then dropping his head to the original position, he balanced a large piece of pumpkin-pie on the point of his knife, and gallantly charged with it down his throat. Poor youth! a neighbour relieved his distress, and saved his ivories.

The great general got seriously to work. Hardly had he started when an innocent young man, who had finished his sweets and was thinking about going for some nuts, noticed the nutcrackers sitting unused in front of the culinary general and asked, "Could I borrow the nutcrackers, sir?" The great general looked up and shot the youth one of those intense glares that Napoleon used to give anyone who dared ask an annoying question. The young man, picking up on the unspoken refusal in that fierce glare, still had the guts to add, "You don’t need them, sir!" That was too much for the general to ignore, so he replied with clear annoyance, "But I think I will, sir!" Then, lowering his head back down, he balanced a large piece of pumpkin pie on the end of his knife and dramatically swallowed it whole. Poor guy! A neighbor came to his rescue, saving his teeth.

Nearly a quarter of an hour has elapsed; dinner is all over, the nuts are all cracked and put in the pockets, and away the company go either to the other end of the saloon, where the stove is placed, round which they eat their nuts and smoke their cigars, or to drink at the bar. When the smoking is over, clasp-knives are opened. Don't be alarmed; there is no bloodshed intended, although half a dozen people strolling about with these weapons may appear ominous. Watch their faces; the lower part of their cheeks goes in with high-sucking pressure, then swells again, and the active tongue sweeps with restless energy along and around the ivory barriers within its range. In vain—in vain it strives to dispossess the intruders; rebellious particles of nut burrow deep between the ivories, like rabbits in an old stone dike. The knife comes to the rescue, and, plunging fearlessly into the dark abyss, the victory is won. Then the victors commence chewing à l'outrance, and expectorate on the red-hot stove, till it hisses like a steam-engine, or else they deluge the floor until there is no alternative but thick shoes or damp feet. The fumes of every known alcohol exhale from the bar, and mix with the head-bursting fragrance of the strongest "Warginny." Some seek safety in flight; others luxuriate in the poisonous atmosphere, and scream out, like deeply-injured men, if any door by chance be left open.

Almost fifteen minutes have passed; dinner is finished, the nuts are all cracked and stashed in pockets, and the group moves to either the other end of the room, where the stove is located, to eat their nuts and smoke their cigars, or to grab drinks at the bar. Once the smoking wraps up, pocket knives are pulled out. Don’t worry; there’s no intent to shed blood, even though half a dozen people wandering around with these tools might seem concerning. Watch their faces; the lower parts of their cheeks suck in with a high-pressure pull, then puff up again, while their busy tongues dart restlessly along the ivory barriers of their teeth. It’s a losing battle—the intruding nut particles stubbornly hide between their teeth, like rabbits in an old stone wall. The knife comes to the rescue, diving boldly into the dark crevices, and victory is secured. Then the winners begin chewing intensely and spit onto the red-hot stove, making it hiss like a steam engine, or they soak the floor until the only choices left are heavy shoes or wet feet. The air is thick with the scent of every kind of alcohol from the bar, blending with the head-spinning aroma of the strongest "Warginny." Some seek refuge by leaving; others luxuriate in the toxic atmosphere and scream out, like wronged souls, if any door happens to be left ajar.

Behold! the table is laid again for dinner; piles of food keep coming in; the company arrive—some in coats, some in waistcoats only; some in coloured shirts, some in red flannel shirts; one, with sleeves turned up to the elbow. "Who on earth are these?" I ask, in my ignorance. "Oh! those, I guess, are the officers of the ship." Truly, they are "free," but whether "enlightened" also I had no opportunity of ascertaining. A short ten minutes, and they are all scattered, and the piles of food with them. Once more I look, and, behold! the table is again preparing. Who can this be for? Doubts are speedily solved, as a mixture of niggers and whites sit down to the festive hoard; it is the boys—alias waiters—whose turn has come at last. Their meal over, the spare leaves of the table are removed, half a dozen square tables dot the centre line of the saloon, and all is comparatively quiet. This process takes place at every meal—8 A.M., 1 P.M., and 5 P.M.—with the most rigid punctuality.

Look! The table is set again for dinner; heaps of food keep coming in; the guests arrive—some in coats, some in just vests; some in colored shirts, some in red flannel shirts; one with his sleeves rolled up to the elbows. "Who are these people?" I ask, not knowing any better. "Oh! those are probably the ship’s officers." They are certainly "free," but whether they are "enlightened" too, I had no way to tell. Just ten minutes later, they are all spread out, and the piles of food are gone with them. Once again, I look, and, surprise! the table is being set up again. Who could this be for? My doubts are quickly answered as a mix of Black and white people sit down to the feast; it’s the boys—alias waiters—whose turn has finally come. After their meal, the extra leaves of the table are taken away, half a dozen square tables are set up in the center of the dining room, and everything is comparatively quiet. This happens at every meal—8 A.M., 1 P.M., and 5 P.M.—with strict punctuality.

Fancy my distress one evening, when, on opening my cabin-door, I beheld a fellow-creature doubled up at the entry of the door opposite. I thought the poor sufferer had a fit of cholera, and I was expecting each instant to hear his screams; but hearing nothing, I examined the person in question more minutely. It was merely a gentleman, who had dispossessed himself of his jacket, waistcoat, trousers, and boots, not forgetting his stockings; and then deliberately planting his chair in the open entry of the door, and gathering up one foot on the seat thereof, was amusing himself by cutting and picking the horny excrescences of his pedal digits, for the benefit of the passengers in the gentlemen's saloon; and, unfortunately, you could not be sure that his hands would be washed before he sat next to you at breakfast in the morning,—for I can testify that I have, over and over again, sat next to people, on these Western waters, whose hands were scarce fit to take coals out of a scuttle.

Imagine my distress one evening when, upon opening my cabin door, I saw a fellow passenger crouched down in front of the opposite door. I thought the poor person was having a cholera attack and expected to hear screams any moment. But hearing nothing, I took a closer look. It was just a man who had stripped off his jacket, waistcoat, trousers, and boots, not to mention his socks. He had set his chair right in the doorway and propped one foot up on it, busying himself by scraping and picking at the calluses on his toes, seemingly indifferent to the other guests in the gentleman's lounge. Unfortunately, you couldn’t be sure he would wash his hands before sitting next to you for breakfast the next morning—because I can say from experience that I had repeatedly sat next to people on those Western waters whose hands were hardly clean enough to touch the coal shovel.

There is nothing I have here set down but what actually passed under my own eye. You will, of course, find gentlemen on board, and many whose manners there is nothing to complain of, and whose conversation is both instructive and amusing; but you evidently are liable to find others to realize the picture I have given of scenes in the gentlemen's saloon, and, unless you have some acquaintance among the ladies, their saloon is as sacred from a gentleman as the Sultan's harem. And whence comes all this, except from that famous bugbear "equality?" Is there any real gentleman throughout the Empire State who would, in his heart, approve of this ridiculous hustling together of well-bred and ill-bred? But it pleases the masses, and they must submit to this incongruous herding and feeding, like the hungry dogs of a "Dotheboys Hall" kennel.

There’s nothing I’ve written here that didn’t actually happen right in front of me. You’ll definitely meet some gentlemen on board, many of whom have perfectly fine manners and conversations that are both enlightening and entertaining. However, you’re likely to encounter others that fit the image I painted of scenes in the gentlemen’s lounge, and unless you know some of the ladies, their lounge is off-limits to gentlemen, just like the Sultan’s harem. Where does all this come from, if not from that infamous scare tactic “equality?” Is there really any gentleman in the Empire State who would honestly support this absurd mixing of the refined and the unrefined? But the masses enjoy it, and they have to accept this strange mingling and feeding, like hungry dogs at a “Dotheboys Hall” kennel.

It may be useful information for the traveller, and is only fair to the Mississippi boat proprietors, to observe, that if you succeed in getting a passage in a perfectly new boat, there is always more care, more safety, better living, and better company. In all the boats there is one brush and comb for the use of the passengers.

It might be helpful for travelers to know, and it's only fair to the Mississippi boat owners to mention, that if you manage to get a ride on a brand new boat, there's usually more care, better safety, nicer accommodations, and better company. In all the boats, there's one brush and comb available for passengers to use.

By the aid of steam and stream, we at last reached Cairo, which is on the southern bank of the Ohio and the eastern of the Mississippi; its advantageous position has not passed unnoticed, but much money has been thrown away upon it, owing to the company's not sitting down and counting the cost before they began. There can be no question that, geographically, it is par excellence the site for the largest inland town of America, situated as it is at the confluence of the two giant arteries; and not merely is its position so excellent but mountains of coal are in its neighbourhood. The difficulty which has to be contended against is the inundation of these rivers. Former speculators built up levees; but either from want of pluck or purse, they were inefficiently constructed; the Mississippi overflowed them and overwhelmed the speculators. Latterly, however, another company has taken the task in hand, and having sufficient capital, it embraces the coal mines as well as the site, &c., of the new town, to which the coal will of course be brought by rail, and thus be enabled to supply the steamers on both rivers at the cheapest rate, and considerably less than one-third the price of wood; and if the indefatigable Swede's calorie-engine should ever become practicable, every steamer will easily carry sufficient coal from Cairo to last till her return; in short, I think it requires no prophetic eye to foresee that Cairo in fifty years, if the Union continues, will be one of the greatest, most important, and most flourishing inland towns in America; and curiously enough, this effect will be essentially brought about by the British capital embarked in the enterprise.

By using steam and rivers, we finally arrived in Cairo, which sits on the southern bank of the Ohio River and the eastern side of the Mississippi. Its prime location hasn't gone unnoticed, but a lot of money has been wasted on it because the company didn't take the time to assess the costs before they started. There's no doubt that, geographically, it is the ideal spot for the largest inland town in America, located at the meeting point of these two major rivers; not only is its position excellent, but there are also massive coal deposits nearby. The challenge we face is the flooding from these rivers. Previous investors built levees, but due to a lack of courage or funding, they were poorly made; the Mississippi overflowed them and took down the speculators. More recently, however, another company has taken on the project with enough capital, and it includes the coal mines as well as the location and other aspects of the new town. The coal will be transported by rail, allowing it to supply the steamers on both rivers at a lower cost—considerably less than one-third the price of wood. If the tireless Swede's calorie-engine ever becomes practical, every steamer will be able to carry enough coal from Cairo to last until its return. In short, it doesn't take a visionary to see that in fifty years, if the Union remains, Cairo will be one of the greatest, most significant, and most thriving inland towns in America; interestingly, this change will largely result from British investment in the project.

A few hours' run up the river brought us to St. Louis, whose nose, I prophesy, is to be put out of joint by Cairo some future day. Nevertheless, what a wonderful place is this same St. Louis; its rapid increase is almost as extraordinary as that of Cincinnati, and perhaps more so, when you consider, not only that it is further west by hundreds of miles, but that it has to contend with the overflowing of the Mississippi, which has, on more than one occasion, risen to the first floor of the houses and stores built on the edge of the levee; fortunately, the greater part of the town, being built on higher ground, escapes the ruinous periodical duckings. It is situated seven hundred and fifty miles below the falls of St. Anthony, and twelve hundred miles above New Orleans.

A few hours' journey up the river got us to St. Louis, which I predict will be overshadowed by Cairo someday. Still, what an amazing place St. Louis is; its rapid growth is almost as remarkable as that of Cincinnati, maybe even more so when you think about the fact that it’s hundreds of miles farther west and has to deal with the Mississippi overflowing, which has, more than once, risen to the first floor of the homes and shops built along the levee. Luckily, most of the town is on higher ground, so it avoids the damaging floods. It's located seven hundred and fifty miles below the falls of St. Anthony and twelve hundred miles above New Orleans.

Le Clede and his party appreciated the value of its position as early as 1764, and named it in honour of Louis the Fifteenth. Subsequently it was transferred to the Spaniards, in 1768: however, it made but little progress until it passed into the hands of the United States, in 1804. The energy of the American character soon changed the face of affairs, and there are now 3000 steam-boats arriving annually, which I believe to be a greater number than there were inhabitants at the date of its cession to them. But the more active impulse seems to have commenced in 1830, at which time the population was under 7000, since which date it has so rapidly increased, that in 1852 its population was bordering on 100,000. The natives of the United States form about one-half of the community, and those of Germany one-fourth; the remainder are chiefly Irish. There are twenty newspapers, of which four are published in German. There are forty churches, one-fourth of which are Roman Catholic, and a liberal provision is made for education; the material prosperity of this thriving community is evidenced by the fact, that the annual value of the produce of their manufacturing-establishments exceeds 3,000,000l.; flour-mills, sugar refineries, and carpenters, contributing more largely than other occupations; after which come the tailors, thanks probably to the Germans, who appear to have a strong predilection for this trade, at which there are more hands employed than at any other.

Le Clede and his team recognized the importance of its location as early as 1764 and named it in honor of Louis the Fifteenth. It was later handed over to the Spaniards in 1768, but it didn’t progress much until it came under the control of the United States in 1804. The dynamism of the American spirit quickly transformed the situation, and now there are 3,000 steamboats arriving each year, which I believe is more than the number of residents at the time it was ceded. However, the significant growth seems to have started in 1830, when the population was less than 7,000; since then, it has increased so rapidly that by 1852, the population was nearing 100,000. Natives of the United States make up about half of the community, while those from Germany account for a quarter; the rest are mostly Irish. There are twenty newspapers, four of which are published in German. The community has forty churches, a quarter of which are Roman Catholic, and education is well-supported. The economic prosperity of this thriving community is evident in the fact that the annual value of their manufacturing output exceeds £3,000,000; flour mills, sugar refineries, and carpenters contribute more than other trades, followed by tailors, likely due to the Germans, who seem to have a strong preference for this profession, where more workers are employed than in any other.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Messrs. Wallis and Whitworth, in their Report on the Industry of the United States, remark at Chapter V.—"In no branch of manufacture does the application of labour-saving machinery produce, by simple means, more important results than in the working of wood."


Since my return to England, I have seen it asserted, by a correspondent in the Morning Chronicle, that Colonel Crogan, of Louisville, purchased this cave for 2000l., and that, shortly after, he was offered 20,000l. for his bargain. It is further stated that, in his will, he tied it up in his family for two generations. If this latter be true, it proves that entails are not quite unknown even in the Democratic Republic.


I have heard, since my return to England, that old Mr. Bell is dead.



CHAPTER X.

River Scenes.




I felt very anxious to make an excursion from St. Louis, and get a little shooting, either to the north-west or down near Cairo, where there are deer; but my companion was dying to get to New Orleans, and strongly urged me not to delay, "fiddling after sport." I always looked upon myself as a model of good-natured easiness, ever ready to sacrifice self for a friend; but I have been told by some intimates, that such is not my character, and some have even said, "You're a obstinate follow." If they were wrong, I suffered enough for my easiness; if they were right, I must have yielded the only time that I ought to have been firm; at all events, I gave up my shooting expedition, which I had intended to occupy the time with till a first-class boat started for New Orleans; and, in an evil hour, I allowed myself to be inveigled on board the "Western World." The steam was up, and we were soon bowling down the leviathan artery of the North American continent. Why the said artery should keep the name of the Mississippi, I cannot explain; for, not only is the Missouri the larger river above the confluence, but the Mississippi is a clear stream, with solid, and, in some instances, granite-bound shores, and perfectly free from "snags;" whereas the Missouri has muddy banks, and revels in snags, which, as many have sadly experienced, is the case with the stream on which they are borne throughout its whole length, thereby fully evincing its true parentage, and painfully exhibiting its just right to be termed Missouri; but the rights of men and women are difficult enough to settle, without entering into the rights of rivers, although from them, as from men and women, flow both good and evil. A truce to rights, then, especially in this "Far West," where every one is obliged to maintain his own for himself.

I was really eager to take a trip from St. Louis and do some shooting, either to the northwest or down near Cairo where there are deer. But my friend was excited to get to New Orleans and kept telling me not to waste time "fiddling after sport." I always thought of myself as a nice, easygoing person, always ready to put my needs aside for a friend. However, some close friends have told me that’s not how I actually am, and a few have even said, "You're an obstinate fellow." If they were wrong, I paid enough for my supposed easiness; if they were right, then I must have given in when I should have stood my ground. In any case, I canceled my shooting trip, which I planned to fill the time with until a good boat left for New Orleans, and, at a bad moment, I let myself be lured onto the "Western World." The steam was up, and we quickly started down the huge river system of the North American continent. I can’t explain why this river system is still called the Mississippi, since the Missouri is a larger river above their confluence. The Mississippi is a clear stream with solid banks, and in some places, granite shores that are free from "snags," while the Missouri has muddy shores and is filled with snags, as many have sadly found out during their journey along it, clearly showing its true nature and justifying being called Missouri. However, figuring out the rights of men and women is complicated enough without delving into the rights of rivers, even though both good and bad come from them, just like people. So, let's set aside the issue of rights, especially in this "Far West," where everyone has to defend their own.

This river is one of the places assigned as the scene of the conversation between the philosopher and the boatman—a tale so old, that it had probably died out before some of my younger readers were born; I therefore insert it for their benefit exclusively.—A philosopher, having arrived at a ferry, entered a boat, rowed by one of those rare articles in this enlightened Republic—a man without any education.

This river is one of the spots where the conversation between the philosopher and the boatman took place—a story so old that it probably faded from memory before some of my younger readers were born; I’m sharing it just for their benefit. —A philosopher, having reached a ferry, got into a boat rowed by one of those rare individuals in this enlightened Republic—a man with no education.

PHILOSOPHER (loquitur).—Can you write?

PHILOSOPHER (speaks).—Can you write?

BOATMAN.—I guess I can't.

BOATMAN.—I guess I can’t.

PHILOSOPHER.—How sad! why, you've lost one-third of your life! Of course you can read?

PHILOSOPHER.—How unfortunate! You've lost a third of your life! Can you read at least?

BOATMAN,—Well, I guess I can't that neither.

BOATMAN,—Well, I guess I can't do that either.

PHILOSOPHER.—Good gracious me! why, you've lost two-thirds of your life.

PHILOSOPHER.—Wow! You've wasted two-thirds of your life.

When the conversation had proceeded thus far, the boatman discovered that, in listening to his learned passenger, he had neglected that vigilance which the danger of the river rendered indispensable. The stream was hurrying them into a most frightful snag; escape was hopeless; so the boatman opened the conversation with this startling question:

When the conversation had gone this far, the boatman realized that, while listening to his knowledgeable passenger, he had overlooked the caution necessary due to the dangers of the river. The current was rushing them toward a terrifying snag; there was no way to escape, so the boatman started the conversation with this shocking question:

BOATMAN.—Can you swim, sir?

BOATMAN.—Can you swim, sir?

PHILOSOPHER.—No, that I can't.

PHILOSOPHER.—No, I can’t do that.

BOATMAN.—Then, I guess, you've lost all your life.

BOATMAN.—Then, I guess you've lost everything in your life.

Ere the sentence was finished, the boat upset; the sturdy rower struggled manfully, and reached the shore in safety. On looking round, nought was to be seen of the philosopher save his hat, floating down to New Orleans. The boatman sat down on the bank, reflecting on the fate of the philosopher; and, as the beaver disappeared in the bend of the river, he rose up and gave vent to his reflections in the following terms: "I guess that gentleman was never taught much of the useful; learning is a good thing in its place, but I guess swimming is the thing on the Mississippi, fix it how you will."

Before the sentence was finished, the boat capsized; the strong rower struggled bravely and made it to shore safely. When he looked around, there was nothing to see of the philosopher except for his hat, floating down to New Orleans. The boatman sat on the bank, pondering the philosopher's fate; and as the beaver disappeared around the bend of the river, he stood up and expressed his thoughts in these words: "I guess that guy wasn't taught much about useful skills; education is good in its own way, but I guess knowing how to swim is essential on the Mississippi, no matter what."

As I have alluded to that rara avis in the United States, a totally uneducated man, I may as well give an amusing specimen of the production of another Western, whose studies were evidently in their infancy. It is a certificate of marriage, and runs thus:—

As I mentioned earlier about that rara avis in the United States, a completely uneducated man, I might as well share an amusing example of the work from another Westerner, whose studies were clearly just starting out. It's a marriage certificate, and it goes like this:—

"State of Illinois, Peoria County"

"Greetings to everyone. Please be aware that John Smith and Peggy Myres are"

hereby certified to be together and act like old folks do, anywhere

Inside the coperas precinct, and when my commission arrives, I am supposed to marry them.

good, and date them back to kivver accidents.

"O---- M---- R---- [ss]"

"Justice of the Peace."

Let us now return to the "Western World."

Let’s go back to the "Western World."

Having committed the indiscretion of taking my passage on board of her, the next step I took—i.e., paying for it—was worse, and proclaimed me a griffin. The old stagers know these waters too well to think of paying before they are at, or about, the end of their journey. Having, however, both taken and paid for my passage, and committed what old maids and sailors would call the audacious folly of starting upon a Friday, I may as well give you a description of the boat.

Having made the mistake of booking my trip on her, the next thing I did—namely, paying for it—was even worse and marked me as a newbie. The seasoned travelers know these waters well enough to wait until they’re at or near the end of their journey to pay. However, since I both booked and paid for my trip and committed what old maids and sailors would call the bold mistake of starting on a Friday, I might as well describe the boat to you.

The river at many places and in many seasons being very low, these steamers are built as light as possible; in short, I believe they are built as light as any company can be found to insure them. Above the natural load-line they flam out like the rim of a washing-basin, so as to give breadth for the superstructure; on the deck is placed the engine and appurtenances, fuel, &c.; whatever is not so occupied is for freight. This deck is open all round, and has pillars placed at convenient distances, about fifteen to twenty feet high, to support the cabin deck. The cabin deck is occupied in the centre by a saloon, extending nearly the whole length of the vessel, with sleeping cabins—two beds in each—opening off it on both sides. The saloon is entered from forward; about one-third of its length at the after-end is shut off by doors, forming the ladies' sanctum, which is provided with sofas, arm-chairs, piano, &c.; about one-fifth of the length at the foremost-end, but not separated in any way, is the smoking-place, with the bar quite handy, and the stove in the centre. The floor of this place may with propriety be termed the great expectorating deposit, owing to the inducements it offers for centralization, though, of course, no creek or cranny of the vessel is free from this American tobacco-tax—if I may presume so to dignify and designate it. Having thus taken off one-third and one-fifth, the remaining portion is the "gentlemen's share"—how many 'eenths it may be, I leave to fractional calculators. Their average size is about sixteen feet broad, and from seven and a half to eight and a half feet high; the centre part is further raised about eighteen inches, having glass along the sides thereof, to give light; they are always well painted and elaborately gilt—in some vessels, such as the "Eclipse," of Louisville, they are quite gorgeous. The cabins are about six feet by seven, the same height as the saloon, and lit by a door on the outside part, the upper portion of which is glass, protected, if required, by folding jalousies, intended chiefly for summer use. Outside these cabins a gallery runs round, covered at the top, and about four feet broad, and with entries to the main cabin on each side. The box which covers the paddle-wheel, &c., helps to make a break in this gallery, separating the gentlemen from the ladies.

The river at many points and during many seasons is quite low, so these steamers are built as light as possible; in fact, I believe they’re constructed as lightly as any company can insure them. Above the natural load line, they flare out like the rim of a washing basin to provide space for the superstructure; the engine and necessary equipment, fuel, etc., are placed on the deck. Whatever space isn’t occupied by that is reserved for freight. This deck is open all around and has pillars set at convenient distances, about fifteen to twenty feet high, to support the cabin deck. The cabin deck is mainly occupied by a saloon that stretches nearly the entire length of the vessel, with sleeping cabins—two beds in each—leading off on both sides. The saloon is accessed from the front; about one-third of its length at the back is sectioned off by doors, creating a ladies' area furnished with sofas, armchairs, a piano, etc. About one-fifth of the length at the front, though not enclosed, is a smoking area with a bar conveniently located and a stove in the center. The floor of this area could rightly be called the great spitting ground due to how conducive it is to gathering, although of course, no part of the vessel is free from this American tobacco tax—if I may elevate and name it as such. After removing one-third and one-fifth, the remaining space is the "gentlemen's share"—how many parts that might be, I leave to those good with fractions. Their average size is about sixteen feet wide and from seven and a half to eight and a half feet high; the center section is raised about eighteen inches, fitted with glass along the sides for light; they’re always well painted and elaborately gilded—in some vessels, like the "Eclipse" from Louisville, they are quite stunning. The cabins are about six feet by seven, the same height as the saloon, and lit by a door on the outside, the upper part of which is glass, protected when needed by folding jalousies, mainly for summer use. Outside these cabins, there’s a gallery that runs all the way around, covered on top, about four feet wide, and with entrances to the main cabin on each side. The structure that covers the paddle wheel, etc., creates a break in this gallery, separating the gentlemen from the ladies.

Some boats have a narrow passage connecting the two galleries, but fitted with a grille door, to prevent intrusion into the harem gallery; before, the paddle-box, on one side, is the steward's pantry, and on the other, that indispensable luxury to an American, the barber's shop; where, at all hours of the day, the free and enlightened, mounted on throne-like chairs and lofty footstools, stretch their carcases at full length, to enjoy the tweaking of their noses and the scraping of their chins, by the artistic nigger who officiates. This distinguished official is also the solo dispenser of the luxury of oysters, upon which fish the Anglo-Saxon in this hemisphere is intensely ravenous. It looks funny enough to a stranger, to see a notice hung up (generally near the bar), "Oysters to be had in the barber's saloon." Everything is saloon in America. Above this saloon deck, and its auxiliaries of barber-shop, gallery, &c., is the hurricane-deck, whereon is a small collection of cabins for the captain, pilots, &c.—there are always two of the latter, and their pay each, the captain told me, is forty pounds a month—and towering above these cabins is the wheel-house, lit all round by large windows, whence all orders to the engineers are readily transmitted by the sound of a good bell. The remainder of the deck—which is, in fact, only the roof of the saloon-cabins and gallery—is open to all those who feel disposed to admire distant views under the soothing influence of an eternal shower of wood-cinders and soot. These vessels vary in breadth from thirty-five to fifty feet, and from one hundred and fifty to—the "Eclipse"—three hundred and sixty-five feet in length; the saloons extending the whole length, except about thirty feet at each end. They have obtained the name of "palace-steamers," and at a coup d'oeil they appear to deserve it, for they are grand and imposing, both outside and inside; but many an European who has travelled in them will agree with me in the assertion, that they might, with more propriety, be termed "palace sepulchres;" not merely from the loss of life to which their constant disasters give rise, but also from the contrast between the grandeur outside and the uncleanliness within, of which latter I have already given a sketch in my trip from Louisville.

Some boats have a narrow passage connecting the two galleries, but they have a grille door to prevent anyone from entering the harem gallery. In front, on one side, is the steward's pantry, and on the other, the must-have luxury for an American, the barber's shop, where at all hours of the day, people relax in throne-like chairs and tall footstools, stretching out to enjoy the grooming of their noses and chins by the skilled barber. This special worker is also the only one who offers the luxury of oysters, which the Anglo-Saxon in this region is always craving. It looks quite amusing to a newcomer to see a sign hanging up (usually near the bar) that says, "Oysters to be had in the barber's saloon." Everything is a saloon in America. Above this saloon deck, along with its barber shop and galleries, is the hurricane-deck, which has a small collection of cabins for the captain, pilots, etc.—there are always two pilots, and the captain told me they each earn forty pounds a month—and towering above these cabins is the wheelhouse, surrounded by large windows, from which orders to the engineers are easily communicated with the sound of a good bell. The rest of the deck—which is really just the roof of the saloon cabins and gallery—is open to anyone who wants to admire distant views while being lightly showered with wood-cinders and soot. These vessels range in width from thirty-five to fifty feet and in length from one hundred fifty to—the "Eclipse"—three hundred sixty-five feet; the saloons extend the entire length, except for about thirty feet at each end. They've earned the nickname "palace-steamers," and at first glance, they seem to deserve it, as they are grand and impressive both inside and out; however, many Europeans who have traveled on them would agree with me that they could more accurately be called "palace sepulchers," not only because of the lives lost from their frequent disasters, but also due to the stark contrast between the grand exterior and the dirtiness inside, which I have already described during my trip from Louisville.

Some idea may be formed of their solidity, when I tell you they are only calculated to last five years; but at the end of three, it is generally admitted that they have paid for themselves, with good interest. I give you this, on the information derived from a captain who was sole owner, and I have also heard many others repeat the same thing; and yet the "Eclipse" cost 120,000 dollars, or about 25,000l. In the saloon you will always see an account of the goodness of the hull and the soundness of the boilers hung up, and duly attested by the proper inspectors of the same. The way these duties of the inspectors are performed makes it a perfect farce, at least on most occasions.

You can get an idea of their durability when I tell you they’re only meant to last five years; but by the three-year mark, it’s generally accepted that they've already paid for themselves with good returns. I’m sharing this based on information from a captain who was the sole owner, and I’ve heard many others say the same thing; yet the "Eclipse" cost $120,000, or about £25,000. In the lounge, you’ll always see a report on the quality of the hull and the condition of the boilers displayed, certified by the proper inspectors. The way these inspectors do their jobs often turns it into a complete joke, at least most of the time.

The inspector comes on board; the captain and engineer see him, and, of course, they shake hands, for here everybody shakes hands with everybody the moment they meet, if only for the first time; the only variation being in the words addressed: if for the first time, it may run thus:—"Sir, I'm happy to make your acquaintance;" which may be replied to by an additional squeeze, and perhaps a "Sir, I reciprocate." N.B.—Hats off always the first time. If it is a previous acquaintance, then a "Glad to see you, sir," is sufficient.—But to return from this digression. The captain and engineer greet the inspector—"I s'pose you're come to look at our bilers, sir?" "Yes, sir, I am." The parties all instinctively drawing nearer and nearer to the bar. "Well, sir, let's have a drink."—"Well, sir, let's."—"A cigar, sir?"—"Thank'ee, sir!" Parties smoke and drink. Ingeniously enough, the required document and pen and ink are all lying handy: the obdurate heart of the inspector is quite melted by kindness. "Well, sir, I s'pose your bilers are all right?"—"I guess they are that, sir, and nurthin else; you can't go and for to bust them bilers of mine, fix it anyhow you will; you can't that, I do assure you, sir."—What inspector can doubt such clear evidence.—"Take another glass, sir, do."—"Thank'ee, I'll sign this paper first." The inspection is over, all except the "glass" and the "'bacco," which continue to flow and fume. The skippers of these boats are rough enough; but I always found them very civil, plain spoken, and ready to give all the information in their power; and many of them have confessed to me that the inspection was but too often conducted in the manner above described.

The inspector boards the ship; the captain and engineer see him, and, of course, they shake hands because everyone shakes hands with everyone else when they meet, especially for the first time. The only difference is in the words used: if it's the first meeting, it might go like this: "Sir, I'm happy to meet you," which can be responded to with an extra squeeze and maybe a "Sir, I feel the same." Note: Hats off during the first meeting. If they already know each other, a simple "Glad to see you, sir" is enough. But back to the point. The captain and engineer greet the inspector—"I guess you're here to check our boilers, sir?" "Yes, sir, I am." The group instinctively moves closer to the bar. "Well, sir, let's have a drink."—"Sure, let's."—"A cigar, sir?"—"Thank you, sir!" They smoke and drink. Conveniently, the necessary documents and pen and ink are readily available: the inspector's usually tough demeanor softens with kindness. "So, sir, I assume your boilers are all good?"—"I reckon they are, sir, and nothing else; you can't break my boilers, no matter how you try; I assure you, sir." What inspector could deny such clear evidence?—"Have another drink, sir, please."—"Thanks, I'll sign this paper first." The inspection is finished, except for the drinks and cigars, which continue to flow and smoke. The captains of these boats may be a bit rough around the edges, but I've always found them to be very polite, straightforward, and eager to share any information they can; many have admitted to me that inspections are often carried out just as described above.

There is little to interest in the account of a trip down the river. The style of society met with on board these vessels, I have already given you a sketch of; it may sometimes be better, and sometimes worse. One of my "messmates" in this boat, was a young fellow who had been second captain of the mizen-top on board of H.M.S. "Vengeance;" but not liking the style of discipline, especially—as he said—the irritating substitutes for flogging which have been introduced of late years into the Navy, to suit the mawkish sensibility of public opinion in England, as well as the clamours of the all-ruling Press, he took the first opportunity of running away, to seek his fortune in the Far West. He observed to me one day, "Those chaps who kick up such a devil of a row about flogging in the Navy, whatever their intentions may be, are no real friends to the sailor or the service."

There’s not much to find interesting in the story of a trip down the river. I’ve already given you a glimpse of the type of people you meet on these boats; sometimes it’s better, and sometimes it’s worse. One of my “mates” on this boat was a young guy who had been the second captain of the mizen-top on H.M.S. “Vengeance.” However, he didn’t like the way things were run, especially—according to him—the annoying alternatives to flogging that have been introduced recently in the Navy to cater to the overly sensitive public opinion in England, as well as the demands of the ever-powerful Press. He jumped at the chance to run away and find his fortune in the Far West. One day he said to me, “Those guys who make such a big fuss about flogging in the Navy, no matter what their intentions are, aren’t real friends to the sailor or the service.”

As a slight illustration of the truth of his remarks, I may here observe that a purser in the American Navy, in which service they have lately abolished flogging, told me, that soon after the paying off of a line-of-battle ship in which he had been serving, he happened to meet fifty of his old shipmates in the port, and asking them what they were going to do, they told him they were about to embark for England, to take service in the English Navy; for said they, "Since corporal punishment has been abolished, the good men have to do all the work, and that wont pay." Only three of the fifty had ever been in the English service. There can be no doubt that many gentlemen of sensitive minds, seeing the names of their brother officers dragged before the public, through the House of Commons or the columns of an anonymous Press, endeavour to keep up discipline by other means, which annoy Jack far more, or else, slackening the bonds of discipline, leave all the work to be done by the willing and the good; anything, rather than be branded as a tyrant in every quarter of the globe by an anonymous assailant, knowing full well that, however explicit a denial may be inserted, ten people will read the charge for every one that reads its contradiction. But I am wandering from my young friend, the captain of the mizen-top.

As a small example of the truth of his comments, I can note that a purser in the American Navy, where they have recently gotten rid of flogging, told me that shortly after the decommissioning of a battleship he had worked on, he ran into fifty of his former shipmates in the port. When he asked them what they were planning to do, they replied that they were about to sail to England to join the English Navy; they said, “Since they’ve abolished corporal punishment, the good guys have to do all the work, and that doesn’t pay.” Only three of those fifty had ever served in the English Navy. There’s no doubt that many sensitive gentlemen, seeing their fellow officers’ names exposed to the public through the House of Commons or in anonymous articles, try to maintain discipline by other means that annoy sailors much more, or else, by loosening the reins of discipline, allow all the work to fall on the willing and the good; anything to avoid being labeled a tyrant worldwide by some anonymous critic, knowing that no matter how clear a denial is published, ten people will read the accusation for every one who sees the rebuttal. But I’m straying from my young friend, the captain of the mizen-top.

If he did not look very well "got up" in his red shirt, at all events he was clean in his person, thus forming a pleasing contrast to a young chap who came in the evening, and seated himself on the table, where I was playing a game at écarté with my companion. His hands absolutely appeared the hands of a nigger, though his voice was the voice of a white; travelling my eyes up to and beyond his face, I found it was all in keeping; his hair looked like an Indian jungle. If some one could only have caught him by the heels, and swung him round and round on a carding machine, like a handful of hemp, it would have improved him immensely; especially if, after going through that process, he had been passed between two of the pigs through the scalding-trough at Cincinnati. Among others of our fellow-voyagers, we found one or two very agreeable and intelligent American gentlemen, who, though more accustomed to the désagréments of travel, were fully alive to it, and expressed their disgust in the freest manner.

If he didn't look great in his red shirt, at least he was clean, which made a nice contrast to a young guy who came in the evening and sat on the table while I was playing a game of écarté with my friend. His hands looked like they belonged to someone from a different race, even though his voice sounded white. As I glanced up at him, everything about him matched that vibe; his hair was wild, like an overgrown jungle. If only someone could have grabbed him by the ankles and swung him around on a carding machine, like a bunch of hemp, it would have done him a world of good—especially if, after that, he’d been run through the scalding trough at Cincinnati. Among our fellow travelers, we met a couple of very pleasant and intelligent American guys who, although they were more used to the downsides of travel, were very aware of it and freely shared their disgust.

Let us now turn from company to scenery.—What is there to be said on this latter subject? Truly it is nought but sameness on a gigantic scale. What there is of grand is all in the imagination, or rather the reflection, that you are on the bosom of the largest artery of commerce in the world. What meets the eye is an average breadth of from half a mile to a mile of muddy water, tenanted by uprooted trees, and bristling with formidable snags. On either side a continuous forest confines the view, thus depriving the scene of that solemn grandeur which the horizonless desert or the boundless main is calculated to inspire. The signs of human life, like angels' visits, are few and far between. No beast is seen in the forest, no bird in the air, except from time to time a flight of water-fowl. At times the eye is gratified by a convocation of wild swans, geese, and ducks, assembled in conclave upon the edge of some bank; or, if perchance at sunrise or sunset you happen to come to some broad bend of the river, the gorgeous rays light up its surface till it appears a lake of liquid fire, rendered brighter by the surrounding darkness of the dense and leafless forest. Occasionally the trumpet-toned pipe of the engine—fit music for the woods—bursts forth; but there are no mountains or valleys to echo its strains far and wide. The grenadier ranks of vegetable life, standing like sentries along the margin of the stream, refuse it either an entry or an answer, and the rude voice of mechanism finds a speedy and certain sepulture in the muddy banks. This savage refusal of Nature to hold converse is occasionally relieved by the sight of a log hut, surrounded with cords of wood[P] prepared for sale to the steamers. At other times a few straggling huts, and piles of goods ready for transport, vary the scene. Sometimes you come to a real village, and there you generally find an old steamer doing duty for wharf-boat and hotel, in case of passengers landing at unseasonable hours of the night. Thanks also to the great commercial activity of the larger towns above, the monotony of the river is occasionally relieved by the sight of steam-boats, barges, coal-boats, salt-boats, &c. Now and then one's heart is cheered and one's spirits fortified by the sight of a vessel or two that has been snagged, and which the indignant stream appears to have left there as a gentle hint for travellers.

Let’s shift our focus from the company to the scenery. What can we say about this latter topic? Honestly, it’s just the same thing over and over again on a huge scale. Any grandeur is mostly in your imagination, or rather in the understanding that you’re on the largest trade route in the world. What you actually see is a stretch of muddy water ranging from half a mile to a mile, filled with uprooted trees and sharp snags. On both sides, a continuous forest limits the view, robbing the scene of the solemn majesty that an endless desert or an open ocean could inspire. Signs of human life are rare, much like angelic visits. You don’t see any animals in the forest or birds in the sky, except for the occasional flock of waterfowl. Sometimes, you might be pleased to see a gathering of wild swans, geese, and ducks congregating on the riverbank; or, if you happen to be there at sunrise or sunset, the beautiful rays illuminate the river's surface, making it look like a lake of liquid fire, especially striking against the dark, bare forest. Occasionally, the loud sound of the engine—perfect music for the woods—breaks the silence, but there are no mountains or valleys to carry its sound far. The towering trees along the river's edge don’t respond or allow it entry, and the harsh sounds of machinery quickly vanish into the muddy banks. This raw indifference of nature is sometimes interrupted by the sight of a log cabin surrounded by stacks of firewood prepared for sale to the steamers. At other times, a few scattered huts and piles of goods ready for shipment change up the scene. Occasionally, you might come across a proper village, where you’ll usually find an old steamer acting as both a dock and a hotel for passengers arriving during late hours of the night. Thanks to the bustling commerce of the larger towns upstream, the river’s monotony is occasionally disrupted by the sight of steam boats, barges, coal boats, salt boats, and more. Every so often, your heart lifts and your spirits get a boost from seeing a vessel or two that has run aground, as if the offended river had left them there as a gentle warning for travelers.

Thus the day passes on, and, when night closes in, you bid adieu to your friends, not with "Pleasant dreams to you!" but with a kind of mysterious smile, and a "I hope we sha'n't be snagged to-night!" You then retire to your cabin, and ... what you do there depends on yourself; but a man whose mind is not sobered when travelling on these waters is not to be envied.

Thus the day goes by, and when night falls, you say goodbye to your friends, not with "Sweet dreams!" but with a kind of mysterious smile and a "I hope we don't run into trouble tonight!" You then head back to your cabin, and ... what you do there is up to you; but a person who isn't feeling serious while traveling these waters is not someone to be envied.

When you leave your cabin in the morning, as you enter the saloon, you fancy a cask of spirits has burst. A little observation will show you your mistake, and the cause of it; which is merely that the free and enlightened are taking their morning drink at the bar. Truly they are a wonderful race; or, as they themselves sometimes express it, "We are a tall nation, sir; a big people." Though they drink on all occasions, whether from sociability or self-indulgence, and at all times, from rosy morn to dewy eve, and long after;—though breath and clothes are "alive" with the odour of alcohol, you will scarcely ever see a passenger drunk. Cards are also going all day long, and there is generally a Fancy-man—or blackleg—ready to oblige a friend. These card-playings are conducted quietly enough at present; but an old traveller told me he remembered, some fifteen years ago, when things were very different, and when every player came armed with a pistol and bowie-knife, by which all little difficulties as to an odd trick or a bet were speedily settled on the spot. In those days the sun never rose and set without witnessing one or more of these exciting little adjustments of difficulties, with which the bystanders were too good judges ever to interfere. In fact, they seem to have been considered as merely pleasing little breaks in the monotony of the trip.

When you leave your cabin in the morning and walk into the saloon, it feels like a cask of spirits has burst. A little observation will reveal your mistake and its cause, which is simply that the free and enlightened are having their morning drinks at the bar. They truly are an amazing group; or, as they sometimes say, "We are a tall nation, sir; a big people." Although they drink on all occasions, whether for social reasons or self-indulgence, from rosy dawn to dewy dusk, and long after;—even though their breath and clothes reek of alcohol, you will hardly ever see a passenger drunk. People are also playing cards all day long, and there’s usually a Fancy-man—or blackleg—ready to help a friend out. These card games are happening quietly for now; but an old traveler told me he remembered about fifteen years ago, when things were very different, and when every player came armed with a pistol and bowie knife to quickly settle any little disputes about an odd trick or a bet on the spot. Back then, the sun rose and set without witnessing one or more of these exciting little resolutions, which bystanders were always too wise to interfere with. In fact, they seemed to be regarded as just entertaining little breaks in the monotony of the trip.

As it may interest some of my readers, I will endeavour to retail for their amusement a sketch which was given me of a scene of boat-racing in the olden time. The "Screecher" was a vessel belonging to Louisville, having a cargo of wild Kentuckians and other passengers on board, among whom was an old lady, who, having bought a winter stock of bacon, pork, &c., was returning to her home on the banks of the Mississippi. The "Burster" was a St. Louis boat, having on board a lot of wild back-woodsmen, &c. The two rivals met at the confluence of the Ohio and the Mississippi. Beat or burst was the alternative. Victory hung in one scale; in the other, defeat and death. The "Screecher" was a little ahead; gradually the "Burster" closes. The silence of a death-struggle prevails. The Screechers put on more wood, and place more weight on the safety-valve; she bounds ahead. Slowly, but surely, the "Burster" draws nearer. The captain of the "Screecher" looks wistfully at the fires, for the boilers are well-nigh worn out. The "Burster" is almost abreast. The enraged Kentuckians gather round the captain, and, in fury, ask—"Why don't you put more weight on?"

As it might interest some of my readers, I’ll try to share a story for their entertainment about a scene of boat racing from back in the day. The "Screecher" was a boat from Louisville, carrying a load of wild Kentuckians and other passengers, including an old lady who, having bought a winter supply of bacon, pork, etc., was heading home to the banks of the Mississippi. The "Burster" was a St. Louis boat filled with a bunch of wild backwoodsmen, etc. The two rivals met at the junction of the Ohio and the Mississippi rivers. It was a matter of beating or bursting. Victory hung in one balance; defeat and death hung in the other. The "Screecher" was slightly ahead, but gradually the "Burster" was closing in. A tense silence filled the air. The "Screecher" added more wood and increased the pressure on the safety valve; she surged ahead. Slowly but surely, the "Burster" crept closer. The captain of the "Screecher" looked longingly at the fires, as the boilers were nearly worn out. The "Burster" was almost side by side. The furious Kentuckians gathered around the captain, asking in anger, "Why don’t you add more weight on?"

CAPTAIN—"Boilers are done; can't bear it nohow."

CAPTAIN—"The boilers are finished; I can't take it anymore."

KENTUCKIANS—"Can't bear it? You chicken-hearted coward—"

KENTUCKIANS—"Can't handle it? You're such a coward—"

Knives are drawn, pistols click, a hundred voices exclaim, "Get on it yourself, or I'll bury this knife below your outer skin." Their eyes gleam—their hands are raised for the deadly blow. Wild boys, these Kentuckians; the captain knows it too well. A choice of deaths is before him; excitement decides—he mounts the breach. The "Screecher" shoots through the waters, quivering from head to stern. The Kentucky boys yell with delight and defiance. Again the "Burster" closes on her rival. Kentuckians brandish their knives, and call to the negroes, who are already half-roasted, "Pile on the wood; pile like agony; I'll ram a nigger into the fire for every foot the 'Burster' gains." Soon a cry of exultation is heard on board the "Burster," as she shoots up close to her rival. The enraged Kentuckians shout out, "Oil, I swear!--oil, by all creation!" "I smell it!" exclaims the old lady with the store of bacon. Her eyes flash fire; a few words to her slaves Pompey and Caesar, and casks of bacon, smashed quick as thought, lay before the furnace. In it all goes; the "Screecher" is wild; the captain bounds up and down like a parched pea on a filing-pan; once more she flies ahead of her rival "like a streak of greased lightning." Suddenly—horror of horrors!--the river throbs beneath; the forest trees quake like aspen leaves; the voice of many thunders rends the air; clouds of splinters and human limbs darken the sky. The "Burster" is blown to atoms! The captain jumps down, and joins the wild Kentucky boys in a yell of victory, through the bass notes of which may be heard the shrill voice of the old lady, crying, "I did it, I did it—it's all my bacon!"

Knives are out, guns cocked, and a hundred voices shout, "Do it yourself, or I'll stab you!" Their eyes are fierce—their hands are ready to strike. Wild boys, these Kentuckians; the captain knows it all too well. He faces a choice of deaths; excitement takes over—he charges into the fray. The "Screecher" cuts through the water, trembling from end to end. The Kentucky boys cheer with joy and defiance. Once again, the "Burster" closes in on her competitor. Kentuckians wave their knives and shout to the enslaved people, who are already half-cooked, "Throw on the wood; pile it on like it's the end of the world; I'll throw a man into the fire for every foot the 'Burster' gains." Soon, a cheer erupts on the "Burster" as she draws near her opponent. The furious Kentuckians yell, "Oil, I swear!--oil, by all that's holy!" "I smell it!" shouts the old lady with the stash of bacon. Her eyes blaze; she gives quick orders to her slaves Pompey and Caesar, and soon casks of bacon, smashed in an instant, are piled in front of the furnace. It all goes in; the "Screecher" is wild; the captain jumps up and down like a dry pea on a hot skillet; once again she speeds ahead of her rival "like a streak of greased lightning." Suddenly—horror of horrors!—the river shakes beneath them; the trees shudder like trembling leaves; loud thunder cracks through the air; clouds of splinters and human limbs fill the sky. The "Burster" is blown to pieces! The captain leaps down and joins the ecstatic Kentucky boys in a victorious yell, over which can be heard the piercing voice of the old lady, shouting, "I did it, I did it—it's all my bacon!"

The struggle over, and the excitement passed, they return and pick up such portions of the human frame as may be found worth preserving.—To resume.

The struggle is over, and the excitement has faded; they come back and gather any parts of the human body that are worth saving.—To continue.

Our captain was overtaken by a telegraphic message, requiring his appearance on a certain day to answer a charge of libel. From what I could glean, it seems that the captain, considering himself cheated by a person with whom he had been transacting business, took the liberty of saying to him, "Well, you're a darned infernal rascal, fix it anyhow you will!" The insulted person sued for 2500 dollars damages, and the captain was obliged to leave us, that he might go and defend his cause. He was a good type of a "hard-a-weather-bird," and I was sorry to see him obliged to quit the ship. I told him so, adding, that if he deserted us, we should be sure to get snagged, or something worse. He replied,—"Oh, no, sir; I guess you'll be safe enough; I shall leave my clerk in charge; he's been a captain of these boats; you'll be right enough, sir." And away he went ashore at Memphis, leaving us to continue our course to New Orleans.

Our captain received a telegram that required him to show up on a certain day to respond to a libel charge. From what I understood, it seems that the captain felt cheated by someone he had been doing business with and said to him, "Well, you're a damn rotten scoundrel, figure it out however you want!" The offended person sued for $2,500 in damages, and the captain had to leave us to defend himself. He was a classic tough guy, and I was sorry to see him go. I told him that if he abandoned us, we’d surely run into trouble. He replied, “Oh, no, sir; I think you’ll be fine; I’ll leave my clerk in charge; he’s been a captain of these boats; you’ll be just fine, sir.” And off he went to shore in Memphis, leaving us to continue our journey to New Orleans.

Night came on, and we all toddled off to roost. I am habitually a very sound sleeper, dropping off the moment I turn in, and never awaking till daylight. On this occasion, however, I awoke about two o'clock A.M., and, do what I would, I could not coax myself to sleep again. While tossing from side to side, I felt the vessel strike as if gently touching a bank; and wood being a good conductor of sound, I heard the water, as it were, gurgling in. My first idea was, "We are snagged;" then, remembering how slight the concussion had been, I calmed my fears and turned over on my side, determined to bottle off a little more sleep if possible. Scarce had the thought crossed the threshold of my mind, when men with hasty steps rushed into the saloon, banging frantically at the cabin-doors, and the piercing cry was heard—"Turn out! turn out!--we're sinking!" Passengers flew from their beds, and opened their doors to get what scanty light the lamps in the saloon might afford. A mysterious and solemn silence prevailed; all was action; no time for words; dress, catch up what you can, and bolt for your life. As I got to the side of the vessel, I saw a steamer alongside, and felt the boat I was in careening over. A neighbour, in fear and desperation, caught hold of me as a drowning man catches at a straw; no time for compliments this, when it is neck or nothing; so, by a right-hander in the pit of the stomach, I got quit of his clutch, and, throwing my desk over to the other boat, I grasped the wooden fender and slid down. Thank God, I was safe!--my companion was already safe also.

Night fell, and we all went to bed. I'm usually a really sound sleeper, falling asleep the moment I lie down and not waking up until morning. However, this time, I woke up around two o'clock A.M., and no matter what I did, I couldn't get back to sleep. While tossing and turning, I felt the boat gently bump as if it had touched something. Since wood carries sound well, I heard the water, so to speak, gurgling in. My first thought was, "We hit something," but remembering how slight the jolt was, I settled my nerves and turned onto my side, determined to squeeze in a little more sleep if I could. Hardly had the thought crossed my mind when men rushed into the lounge, banging on cabin doors, and the urgent cry rang out—"Get up! Get up! We're sinking!" Passengers jumped out of bed, throwing open their doors to catch whatever dim light the saloon lamps provided. An eerie, heavy silence filled the air; everyone was in motion—no time for words; get dressed, grab what you can, and run for your life. As I reached the side of the boat, I saw a steamer next to us, and I felt the boat I was in tipping over. A neighbor, panicking, grabbed me like a drowning person clutches at a lifeline; there was no time for niceties when it was life or death, so with a quick jab to the stomach, I broke free of his grip, tossed my desk to the other boat, grabbed the wooden fender, and slid down. Thank God, I was safe! My companion was already safe too.

It was about half-past four A.M., a drizzly, wet morning, quite dark, except the flame of the torches. A plank was got on board of the sinking boat, along which more passengers and even some luggage were saved. The crew of the sound boat had hard work to keep people from trying to return and save their luggage, thus risking not only their own lives but at the same time impeding the escape of others. From the gallery above I was looking down upon the wreck, lit up by the lurid light of some dozen torches, when, with a crash like thunder, she went clean over and broke into a thousand pieces; eighty head of cattle, fastened by the horns, vainly struggled to escape a watery grave. It was indeed a terrific and awful scene to witness. From the first striking till she went to pieces, not a quarter of an hour had elapsed; but who was saved? Who knew, and—alas! that I must add—who cared?

It was about 4:30 A.M., a drizzly, wet morning, quite dark except for the glow of the torches. A plank was brought onto the sinking boat, along which more passengers and even some luggage were rescued. The crew of the stable boat worked hard to stop people from trying to go back for their bags, risking not only their own lives but also slowing down the escape of others. From the balcony above, I was looking down at the wreck, illuminated by the harsh light of several torches, when, with a crash like thunder, it completely capsized and shattered into a thousand pieces; eighty head of cattle, tied by the horns, desperately struggled to escape a watery grave. It was truly a horrific and dreadful sight to see. From the first impact until it broke apart, not even fifteen minutes had passed; but who was saved? Who knew, and—sadly—I must add—who cared?

The crew worked hard enough to rescue all, and to them be every credit for their exertions; but the indifference exhibited by those who had been snatched from the jaws of death was absolutely appalling. The moment they escaped, they found their way to the bar and the stove, and there they were smoking, drinking, and passing the ribald jest, even before the wreck had gone to pieces, or the fate of one-half of their companions been ascertained. Yet there was a scene before their eyes sufficient, one would have imagined, to have softened the hardest heart and made the most thoughtless think. There, among them, at the very stove round which they were gathered, stood one with a haggard eye and vacant gaze, and at his feet clung two half-naked infants; a quarter of an hour before he was a hale man, a husband, with five children; now, he was an idiot and a widower, with two. No tear dimmed his eye, no trace of grief was to be read in his countenance; though the two pledges of the love of one now no more hung helplessly round his legs, he heeded them not; they sought a father's smile—they found an idiot's stare. They cried: was it for their mother's embrace, or did they miss their brother and sisters? Not even the piteous cry of motherless infancy could light one spark of emotion in the widowed husband's breast—all was one awful blank of idiocy. A wife and three children, buried beneath piles of freight, had found a wretched grave; his heart and his reason had fled after them—never, apparently, to return.

The crew worked hard enough to save everyone, and they deserve all the credit for their efforts; but the indifference shown by those who had been rescued from death was absolutely shocking. As soon as they escaped, they headed straight to the bar and the stove, where they were smoking, drinking, and joking around, even before the wreck had fully fallen apart or the fate of half their companions had been determined. Yet, right in front of them was a scene that would have softened the hardest heart and made the most thoughtless person stop and think. There, among them, at the very stove they were gathered around, stood a man with a haggard expression and a vacant stare, and at his feet clung two half-naked infants; just a quarter of an hour before, he had been a healthy man, a husband, with five children; now, he was an idiot and a widower with two. No tears filled his eyes, and there was no sign of grief on his face; though the two symbols of his love, now lost, clung helplessly around his legs, he paid them no attention; they sought their father’s smile—they found only an idiot’s stare. They cried: were they looking for their mother’s embrace, or did they miss their siblings? Not even the heartbreaking cries of motherless infants could spark a single emotion in the widowed husband’s heart—all was a terrifying void of idiocy. A wife and three children, buried under piles of cargo, had found a tragic grave; his heart and his sanity had gone with them—never, it seemed, to return.

Surely this was a scene pre-eminently calculated to excite in those who wore, by their very escape, living monuments of God's mercy, the deepest feelings of gratitude and commiseration; yet, there stood the poor idiot, as if he had not been; and the jest, the glass, and cigar went on with as much indifference as if the party had just come out of a theatre, instead of having providentially escaped from a struggle between life and death. A more perfect exhibition of heartlessness cannot be conceived, nor do I believe any other part of the world could produce its equal.

Surely this was a scene clearly meant to evoke deep feelings of gratitude and compassion in those who, by their very escape, were living examples of God's mercy; yet, there stood the poor fool, as if he hadn’t been there at all; and the jokes, drinks, and cigars continued with the same indifference as if the group had just come out of a theater, instead of having narrowly escaped a life-or-death struggle. A more complete display of heartlessness is hard to imagine, and I doubt any other place in the world could match it.

The immediate cause of the wreck was the steamer "H.R.W. Hill" running into us, owing to misunderstanding the bell signal; most providentially she caught alongside of us after striking; if she had not done so, God alone knows who could have been saved. As far as I could ascertain, all the first-class passengers were saved. Do not stare at the word first-class, for although in this country of so-called equality no difference of classes is acknowledged, poor helpless emigrants are taken as deck-passengers, and, as freight is the great object, no space is set apart for them; they are stowed away among the cargo as best they can be, with no avenue of escape in case of accidents, and with the additional prospect of being buried beneath bales and barrels. I believe fifteen passengers perished in this way: one poor English-woman among the deck-passengers fought her way through the freight, and, after being nearly drowned and trampled to death under the hoofs of the cattle, succeeded in escaping. A slave-merchant with a dozen negroes managed to save all of them, inasmuch as, being valuable, he had them stowed away in a better place. The moment the wreck was completed, we proceeded up the river, wasting no time in trying to save any part of the cargo or luggage. My own position was anything but a pleasant one, though I trust I was truly thankful for my preservation. I found I had managed to throw my desk between the two steamers, and it was therefore irrecoverably lost, with all my papers, letters of credit, journal, &c. I had also lost everything else except what T had on,—rifle, guns, clothes,—all were gone. A few things, such as money, watch, note-book, which I always kept in my pockets, were all my stock in trade. Fortunately, my friend had saved his papers, and thus our identity could be established at New Orleans. In the course of a few hours we saw a fine steamer coming down the river, in which we embarked, and again pursued our journey south.

The immediate cause of the wreck was the steamer "H.R.W. Hill" running into us due to a misunderstanding of the bell signal; fortunately, she caught alongside us after hitting us; if she hadn’t, it’s hard to say who could have been saved. From what I could tell, all the first-class passengers were saved. Don’t be surprised by the term first-class, because even in this country that claims to be equal, class differences exist; poor, helpless emigrants travel as deck passengers, and since making money is the main goal, no space is set aside for them. They are crammed in among the cargo as best they can manage, with no way to escape in case of emergencies, and they risk being buried under bales and barrels. I believe fifteen passengers died this way: one poor English woman among the deck passengers fought her way through the cargo, and after nearly drowning and being trampled by cattle, managed to escape. A slave trader with a dozen enslaved people managed to save all of them, as, being valuable, he had them stored in a safer place. Once the wreck was over, we moved up the river, wasting no time trying to recover any of the cargo or luggage. My own situation was far from pleasant, though I was genuinely thankful to have survived. I realized I had thrown my desk between the two steamers, and it was now irretrievably lost, along with all my papers, letters of credit, journal, etc. I had also lost everything else except what I was wearing—my rifle, guns, and clothes—all gone. A few items, like money, my watch, and a notebook, which I always kept in my pockets, were all I had left. Fortunately, my friend had saved his papers, so we could establish our identities in New Orleans. After a few hours, we saw a nice steamer coming down the river, which we boarded, and we continued our journey south.

In the afternoon we passed several pieces of the wreck: the shores were covered with the casks of pork and mustang liniment which had formed a great part of our freight. At one place, a large portion of the wreck, was made fast ashore, and being plundered by the settlers on the bank; boxes and trunks were all broken open and cleaned out; little boats were flying across the river full of pork and other prizes: it was an universal scramble in all directions, and appeared to be considered as lawful plunder by them as if they had been Cornish wreckers. It was hopeless to try and recover anything, so we continued our journey, and left our goods to the tender mercies of the landsharks on the banks. Having lost all my papers, I was obliged to forego the pleasure I had anticipated from a visit to Natchez, or rather to the gentlemen and plantations in the neighbourhood.

In the afternoon, we passed several pieces of the wreck: the shores were covered with barrels of pork and mustang liniment, which were a big part of our cargo. At one spot, a large part of the wreck was stuck onshore and being looted by the settlers on the bank; boxes and trunks were all broken open and emptied; little boats raced across the river loaded with pork and other treasures: it was a complete scramble in all directions, and they seemed to think of it as fair game, just like Cornish wreckers. It was pointless to try to recover anything, so we continued our journey and left our belongings to the ruthless landsharks on the banks. Having lost all my papers, I had to give up the enjoyment I had looked forward to from a visit to Natchez, or rather to the gentlemen and plantations in the area.

As you approach the lower part of the river, signs of human life become more frequent; the forest recedes, the banks of the river are leveed up, and legions of Uncle Tom's Cabins stud the banks; some, clustered near the more luxurious but still simple building wherein dwells the proprietor, surrounded by orange groves and the rich flowers and foliage of southern climes. These little spots appear like bright oases in the otherwise dreary, uninteresting flats, which extend from the banks on either side; yet it is only as a scene they are uninteresting; as a reality, they have a peculiar interest. On these Hats the negro slave expends his labour and closes his life, and from the bitter of his career the white man draws the sweet luxury of his own. How few reflect upon this, even for as many seconds as it takes to melt the clarified lump in the smoking bohea. But here we are at La Fayette, which is the upper or American end of New Orleans, where steamers always stop if there are any cattle on board, which being our case, we preferred landing and taking an omnibus, to waiting for the discharge of the live-stock. Half an hour brought us to the St. Louis Hotel, and there you may sit down a minute or two while I make some observations on the steaming in Western rivers.

As you get closer to the lower part of the river, you'll notice more signs of people; the forest pulls back, the banks are leveled, and rows of Uncle Tom's Cabins dot the shore; some are grouped around the larger, yet still modest building where the owner lives, surrounded by orange groves and vibrant flowers and greenery typical of the South. These little spots stand out like bright oases in the otherwise dull and unremarkable flatlands that stretch out from the banks on both sides; however, while the scene may seem uninteresting, the reality has a unique significance. On these plantations, the enslaved Black workers pour their labor and devote their lives, while from the hardships of their lives, the white man enjoys his own comforts. Few take a moment to reflect on this, even for as long as it takes to dissolve a lump of sugar in their hot tea. But here we are at La Fayette, which is the northern or American end of New Orleans, where steamboats always stop if there are cattle on board, which is our situation, so we chose to disembark and take an omnibus instead of waiting for the animals to be unloaded. Half an hour later, we arrived at the St. Louis Hotel, and now you can take a moment to sit down while I share some thoughts about steaming on Western rivers.

The whole system and management is a most grievous reproach to the American nation. I speak not of the architecture, which is good, nor of the absurd inconsistency in uniting such palatial appearance with such absolute discomfort, which perhaps, with their institutions and ideas, it would be very difficult to remedy. My observations refer more to that by which human life is endangered, and the valuable produce of human labour recklessly destroyed. The following extract from a Louisville paper will more than justify any animadversions which I may make:—

The entire system and management is a serious shame for the American nation. I'm not talking about the architecture, which is nice, nor about the ridiculous inconsistency of combining a grand appearance with total discomfort, something that might be hard to fix considering their institutions and ideas. My comments focus more on what puts human life at risk and the valuable results of human labor that are carelessly wasted. The following excerpt from a Louisville newspaper will more than support any criticisms I might make:—

DISASTERS ON WESTERN RIVERS.—The Louisville Courier has published a

List of disasters on Western waters during the year 1852. It is a

impressive one, including 78 steam boats, 4 barges, 73 coal boats, 3

salt-boats, and 4 others, flat-boats. It looks like there were 47 boats in total.

lost by getting snagged, 16 by explosions, 4 were burned, and the others

lost due to collisions and other accidents. The highest number of lives lost

by one disaster was the explosion of the "Saluda," 100. The total loss

of life exceeds 400 people.[Q]

Here is a list of one hundred and sixty-two vessels of different kinds, and four hundred human beings, lost in one year; of which vessels it appears forty-six were snagged. You will naturally ask here, what precautions are taken to avoid such frightful casualties? The answer is short—None. They had a few boats employed once to raise the snags, but the thirst for annexation ran them into a war, and the money was wanted for that purpose. The Westerns say they are ridden over by the Easterns, and that Government will do nothing for them.[R]

Here is a list of one hundred sixty-two different types of vessels and four hundred people lost in just one year; of these vessels, it seems that forty-six were snagged. You might wonder what measures are in place to prevent such terrible losses. The answer is simple—None. They had a few boats that were once used to clear the snags, but the desire for expansion led them into a war, and the funds were needed for that instead. The people in the West claim they’re being overlooked by those in the East and that the government is doing nothing for them.[R]

It is not for me to decide the reasons, but the fact is but too clear, that in a country boasting of its wealth, its power, its resources, and not burdened with one farthing of debt, not a cent is being expended in making the slightest endeavours to remove the dangers of this gigantic artery of commerce. And what would be the cost of this national object? The captains of the boats told me that two dozen snag-boats in three years would clear the river; and that half that number could keep it clear; yet, rather than vote the money requisite, they exhibit a national indifference to the safety of life and property such as, I may confidently affirm, cannot be found in any other civilized nation. A very small tax on the steamers would pay the expenses; but the Westerns say, and say with truth, "This is not a local, this is a national question. Government builds lighthouses, harbours, &c., for the eastern board, and we are entitled to the same care for our commerce." A navigation of two thousand miles is most certainly as thoroughly a national question as a seaboard is. It should also be remembered that, if the navigable tributaries be added, the total presents an unbroken highway of internal commerce amounting to 16,700 miles—a distance which, it has been remarked, "is sufficient to encircle Europe and leave a remnant which would span the Atlantic."

It's not up to me to determine the reasons, but it's clear that in a country that prides itself on its wealth, power, and resources, and isn't burdened with any debt, not a single cent is being spent to address the dangers facing this major commercial route. And what would it cost to tackle this national issue? The boat captains told me that just two dozen snag boats over three years would clear the river, and half that number could keep it clear. Yet, instead of allocating the necessary funds, they show a national indifference to the safety of lives and property that I can confidently say doesn’t exist in any other civilized nation. A very small tax on the steamboats could cover the expenses, but people in the West rightly point out, "This isn't just a local issue; it's a national one. The government builds lighthouses, harbors, etc., for the East Coast, and we deserve the same support for our commerce." A navigation route of two thousand miles is certainly just as much a national concern as any seaboard. It's also important to note that when you include the navigable tributaries, the total creates an uninterrupted highway for internal commerce of 16,700 miles—a distance that has been noted is enough to encircle Europe and still have enough left to span the Atlantic.

Next on the list comes the "explosions." I have already given you an account of how the so-called examinations are too often made. Surely these inspections might be signed upon oath before a magistrate; and as surely, I should hope, men might be found who would not perjure themselves. The burnt vessels are few in number, and more than one case has, I believe, been tried on suspicion of being set fire to intentionally.

Next on the list are the "explosions." I've already explained how the so-called examinations are often conducted. Surely these inspections could be certified under oath before a magistrate; and I hope there are men who wouldn't lie under oath. The number of burnt vessels is small, and I believe there have been more than a few cases tried on suspicion of being intentionally set on fire.

The last on the list is "collisions, &c." By the "&c.," I suppose, is mount vessels which, having run on the river till they wore only fit for firewood, still continued "just one more trip;" and then, of course, the slightest concussion, either on a bank or a floating log, would break them up like a chip basket. The examination on this point is conducted like that of the boilers, and the same remedy might readily be applied. I think, however, that the greater number of losses from collisions, &c., may be chiefly ascribed to the collisions. The cause of these collisions is easily understood, when you are informed that vessels meeting indicate the side they intend to take by sounding a bell. They have no fixed rule, like vessels meeting at sea. The sound of the toll of the second bell may easily be blended with the first, if it be struck hurriedly, which in cases of danger is more than probable; or, the sound of a single toll may find an echo and be mistaken for two tolls. The collision we met with was caused by this very misunderstanding; at least, so the captains mutually explained it. The reason given me for this unsettled system was, that, owing to banks and currents, vessels could not always take the same side. Supposing this to be so, still, a more correct indication of the side intended to be taken might be obtained by lights kept burning for that purpose in a box with a sliding front, removeable at pleasure by a line leading to the wheel-house, in the same way as the lanyard of the bell is at present fitted; and a further palpable advantage would be obtained by obliging vessels meeting in the night to stop the engines and pass at "slow speed." In addition to these precautions, a stout cork fender, extending round the bows some ten feet on each side, and fixed every night at dark, would materially lessen the chances of destruction, even if collision did take place.

The last item on the list is "collisions, etc." By "etc.," I mean vessels that, having traveled on the river until they were only good for firewood, still continued to take "just one more trip;" and then, naturally, even the slightest bump, whether against a bank or a floating log, would break them apart like a basket of chips. The inspection of this issue is done similarly to that of the boilers, and the same solution could easily be applied. However, I believe that most losses from collisions, etc., can primarily be attributed to the collisions themselves. The reason for these collisions is straightforward; vessels approaching each other signal which side they plan to take by ringing a bell. There’s no set rule, like the ones for ships meeting at sea. The sound of the second bell can easily blend with the first if it's rung hastily, which is highly likely in dangerous situations; or, a single toll might echo and be mistaken for two. The collision we experienced occurred because of this misunderstanding; at least, that’s how the captains explained it to each other. The explanation I received for this inconsistent system was that, due to the banks and currents, vessels couldn't always choose the same side. Assuming that’s true, a clearer indication of the intended side could be achieved by using lights designed for that purpose, kept in a box with a sliding front that could be easily operated by a line leading to the wheelhouse, similar to how the lanyard for the bell is currently set up; and an additional clear benefit would come from requiring vessels to stop their engines and proceed at "slow speed" when passing each other at night. Alongside these precautions, a sturdy cork fender, extending about ten feet on each side of the bow and set up every evening at dark, would significantly reduce the chances of damage, even in the event of a collision.

There is, however, another cause of accident which the Louisville paper does not allude to, and that is overloading. We started about two and a half feet out of the water when leaving St. Louis, and, long before we met with our accident, we had taken in cargo till we were scarce five inches above the river. Not only do they cram the lower or freight deck, but the gallery outside the saloons and cabins is filled till all the use and comfort thereof is destroyed, and scarce a passage along them to be obtained. Seeing the accidents such reckless freighting must necessarily give rise to, what more simple than obliging every vessel to have a float or loading line painted from stem to stern at a certain elevation, making the captain and owners liable to a heavy penalty if the said line be brought below the water by the freight. There is one other point which I may as well notice here, and that is the manner in which these boats are allowed to carry deck-passengers. There is no clear portion of deck for them, and they are driven by necessity among the bales and boxes of freight, with no avenue of escape in case of accident. These are the people who suffer in cases of snagging and collision, &c. These hardy sons of toil, migrating with their families, are all but penniless, and therefore, despite all vaunt of equality, they are friendless. Had every deck-passenger that has perished in the agony of a crushing and drowning death been a Member of Senate or Congress, the Government would have interfered long ere this; but these miserable wretches perish in their agony, and there is no one to re-echo that cry in the halls of Congress. They are chiefly poor emigrants, and plenty more will come to fill their places.

There is, however, another cause of accidents that the Louisville paper doesn’t mention, and that’s overloading. When we left St. Louis, we were sitting about two and a half feet above the water, and long before our accident, we had taken on so much cargo that we were barely five inches above the river. Not only do they stuff the lower freight deck, but the gallery outside the saloons and cabins is packed to the point where it loses all comfort and it’s hard to find a clear path along them. Considering the accidents that this reckless loading can cause, how simple would it be to require every vessel to have a float or loading line painted along the side from the front to the back at a certain height, making the captain and owners liable for a heavy fine if that line goes underwater because of the cargo? There’s one more point I should mention here, and that’s how these boats are allowed to carry passengers on the deck. There’s no designated area for them on the deck, and they’re forced to mingle among the bales and boxes of cargo, with no way to escape in case of an accident. These are the people who suffer during snags, collisions, etc. These hardworking individuals, migrating with their families, are almost broke, and so, despite all claims of equality, they have no allies. If every deck passenger who has died in the struggle and drowning had been a Senator or a Member of Congress, the government would have stepped in a long time ago; but these unfortunate souls perish in their suffering, and no one is there to echo their cries in the halls of Congress. They are mostly poor immigrants, and many more will come to take their place.

If the Government took any such steps as those above recommended, the fear of losing insurance by neglecting them would tend greatly to make them respected. Companies would insure at a lower rate, and all parties would be gainers in the long run; for, if the Government obtained no pecuniary profit, it would gain in national character by the removal of a reproach such as no other commercial country at the present day labours under.

If the government took any of the steps mentioned above, the fear of losing insurance by ignoring them would likely lead to greater respect for those measures. Companies would offer insurance at lower rates, and everyone would benefit in the long run; even if the government didn't make any financial profit, it would enhance its national reputation by eliminating a stigma that no other commercial country faces today.

There is, moreover, a moral point of view to be taken of this question—viz., "the recklessness of human life engendered by things as they are."

There is also a moral perspective to consider on this issue—namely, "the recklessness of human life caused by the current state of affairs."

The anecdotes which one hears are of themselves sufficient to leave little doubt on this point. Take, for instance, the following:—A vessel having been blown up during the high pressure of a race, among the witnesses called was one who thus replied to the questions put to him:—

The stories you hear are enough to make it clear on this point. For example, consider this:—A ship was blown up during the intense pressure of a race, and among the witnesses called was one who answered the questions like this:—

EXAMINER.—"Were you on board when the accident took place?"

EXAMINER.—"Were you on the ship when the accident happened?"

WITNESS.—"I guess I was, and nurthing else."

WITNESS.—"I guess I was, and nothing else."

EXAMINER.—"Was the captain sober?"

EXAMINER.—"Was the captain drunk?"

WITNESS.—"Can't tell that, nohow."

WITNESS.—"Can't say that, no way."

EXAMINER.—"Did you not see the captain during the day?"

EXAMINER.—"Didn't you see the captain during the day?"

WITNESS.—"I guess I did."

WITNESS.—"I suppose I did."

EXAMINER.—"Then can, you not state your opinion whether he was drunk or not?"

EXAMINER.—"So can you not say whether he was drunk or not?"

WITNESS.—"I guess I had not much time for observation; he was not on board when I saw him."

WITNESS.—"I don't think I had much time to look closely; he wasn't on the boat when I saw him."

EXAMINER.—"When did you see him, then?"

EXAMINER.—"So, when did you see him?"

WITNESS.—"As I was coming down, I passed the gentleman going up."

WITNESS.—"As I was coming down, I walked past the guy going up."

The court, of course, was highly amused at his coolness, and called another witness.—But let us turn from this fictitious anecdote to fact.

The court, of course, was very amused by his calmness, and called another witness.—But let's move from this made-up story to reality.

It was only the other day that I read in a Louisville paper of a gentleman going into the Gait-house Hotel, and deliberately shooting at another in the dining-saloon when full of people, missing his aim, and the hall lodging in the back of a stranger's chair who was quietly sitting at his dinner. Again, I read of an occurrence—at Memphis, I think—equally outrageous. A man hard pressed by creditors, who had assembled at his house and were urgent in their demands, called to them to keep back, and upon their still pressing on, he seized a bowie-knife in each hand, and rushed among them, stabbing and ripping right and left, till checked in his mad career of assassination by a creditor, in self-defence, burying a cleaver in his skull.

It was just the other day that I read in a Louisville newspaper about a guy who went into the Gait-house Hotel and intentionally shot at another person in the dining room, which was packed with people, missing his target, and the bullet ended up hitting the back of a stranger's chair while he was calmly having his dinner. Then, I came across another incident—somewhere in Memphis, I think—that was just as outrageous. A man, overwhelmed by creditors who had gathered at his house and were insisting on their payments, yelled at them to stay back. When they kept pushing forward, he grabbed a bowie knife in each hand and charged at them, stabbing and slashing wildly until a creditor, acting in self-defense, stopped his rampage by burying a cleaver in his skull.

In a Natchez paper I read as follows:—"Levi Tarver, formerly a resident of Atala county, was recently killed in Texas. Tarver interrupted a gentleman on the highway; high words ensued, when Tarver gave the gentleman the lie; whereupon the latter drew a bowie-knife, and completely severed, at one blow, Levi's head from his body."

In a Natchez newspaper I read the following:—"Levi Tarver, formerly a resident of Atala County, was recently killed in Texas. Tarver confronted a man on the highway; a heated argument started, during which Tarver called the man a liar; at that point, the man pulled out a bowie knife and cleanly severed Levi's head from his body in one blow."

In a St. Louis paper, I read of a German, Hoffman by name, who was supposed by Baker to be too intimate with his wife, and who was consequently desired to discontinue his visits. Hoffman remonstrated in his reply, assuring the husband that his suspicions were groundless. A short time after he received a letter from Mrs. Baker, requesting him to call upon her: he obeyed the summons, and was shown into her bedroom at the hotel. The moment he got there, Mrs. Baker pulled two pistols from under the pillow, and discharged both at his head. Hoffman rushed out of the house; scarce was he in the street, when Mr. Baker and three other ruffians pounced upon him, dragged him back to the hotel, and placed guards at the door to prevent any further ingress from the street. They then stripped him perfectly naked, lashed him with cow-hides till there was scarce a sound piece of flesh in his body, dashing cold water over him at intervals, and then recommencing their barbarities. When tired of this brutality, they emasculated their wretched victim with a common table-knife. And who were these ruffians? Were they uneducated villains, whom poverty and distress had hardened into crime? Far from it. Mr. Baker was the owner of a grocery store; of the others, one was the proprietor of the St. Charles hotel, New Bremen; the second was a young lawyer, the third was a clerk in the "Planter's House." Can the sinks of ignorance and vice in any community present a more bloody scene of brutality than was here deliberately enacted, by educated people in respectable positions, in the middle of the day? What can be thought of the value of human life, when I add that all these miscreants were bailed?

In a St. Louis newspaper, I read about a German named Hoffman, whom Baker believed was too familiar with his wife, leading him to demand that Hoffman stop visiting. In his response, Hoffman insisted that Baker’s suspicions were unfounded. Shortly after, he received a letter from Mrs. Baker asking him to visit her. He complied and was shown into her hotel room. As soon as he arrived, Mrs. Baker pulled out two pistols from under her pillow and fired both at his head. Hoffman ran out of the hotel; just as he hit the street, Mr. Baker and three other thugs jumped on him, dragged him back inside, and stationed guards at the door to prevent anyone from entering. They then stripped him completely naked, whipped him with cowhides until his body was nearly unrecognizable, threw cold water on him at intervals, and resumed their brutal treatment. After tiring of the torture, they castrated their unfortunate victim with a standard table knife. And who were these thugs? Were they uneducated criminals hardened by poverty and hardship? Not at all. Mr. Baker owned a grocery store; one of the others was the owner of the St. Charles Hotel in New Bremen; the second was a young lawyer, and the third was a clerk at the "Planter's House." Can the depths of ignorance and vice in any community present a more horrific scene of brutality than what was deliberately carried out here by educated people in respectable roles, in broad daylight? What can we say about the value of human life when I mention that all these criminals were bailed out?

These are merely the accounts which have met my eye in the natural course of reading the newspaper, for I can most truthfully declare I have not taken the slightest trouble to hunt them up. The following, which bears upon the same point, was related to me in the course of conversation at dinner, and it occurred in New Orleans. Mr. A. treads on Mr. B.'s too several times; Mr. B. kicks Mr. A. down stairs, and this at a respectable evening party. Now what does Mr. A. do? He goes outside and borrows a bowie-knife from a hack-cabman, then returns to the party, watches and follows Mr. B. to the room where the hats and cloaks were placed, seizes a favourable moment, and rips Mr. B.'s bowels open. He is tried for murder, with evidence sufficient to hang a dozen men; and, to the astonishment of even the Westerns themselves, he is acquitted. These facts occurred not many years since, and they were narrated to me by a gentleman who was at the party.

These are just the stories I've come across while reading the newspaper, since I can honestly say I haven't gone out of my way to find them. The next one, which relates to the same topic, was told to me during a dinner conversation, and it happened in New Orleans. Mr. A. steps on Mr. B.'s toes a few times; Mr. B. kicks Mr. A. down the stairs, all at a respectable evening party. So what does Mr. A. do? He goes outside and borrows a bowie knife from a cab driver, then returns to the party, watches Mr. B., and follows him to the room where the hats and coats were kept. He waits for the right moment and then stabs Mr. B. in the stomach. He is put on trial for murder, with enough evidence to convict a dozen men; and, to the shock of even the Westerners, he is found not guilty. These events took place not long ago, and they were shared with me by a gentleman who was at the party.

When two members of the Legislature disgraced the halls at Washington, by descending into the political arena with pistols and bowie-knives, and there entering into deadly conflict, were they not two Western members? Now, what do these occurrences prove? Certainly not that all Westerns are bloodthirsty, for many of them are the most kind, quiet, and amiable men I have ever met; but, when taken in connexion with the free use of the bowie-knife, they afford strong evidence that there is a general and extraordinary recklessness of human life; and surely, common sense and experience would both endorse the assertion, that habituating men to bloody disputes or fatal accidents has a tendency to harden both actors and spectators into utter indifference. And what is the whole of the Western river navigation but one daily—I might almost say, continual—scene of accidents and loss of life, tending to nourish those very feelings which it is the duty of every government to use all possible means to allay and humanize?

When two members of the Legislature brought shame to the halls in Washington by fighting each other with pistols and bowie knives, weren’t they both from the West? So, what do these events prove? Certainly not that all people from the West are violent, because many of them are some of the kindest, calmest, and friendliest individuals I’ve ever met. However, when you consider the frequent use of the bowie knife, it clearly indicates a widespread and alarming disregard for human life. It’s common sense and experience to agree that getting people used to violent disputes or deadly incidents can harden both the participants and onlookers into complete indifference. And what is the whole of Western river navigation but a daily—one might even say, continuous—series of accidents and fatalities that foster the very feelings that every government should strive to calm and humanize?

The heartless apathy with which all classes of society, with scarce individual exceptions, speak of these events is quite revolting to a stranger, and a manifest proof of the injurious moral effect of familiarizing people with such horrors. The bowie-knife, the revolver, and the river accidents, mutually act and react upon each other, and no moral improvement can reasonably be expected until some great change be effected. Government can interfere with the accidents;—deadly weapons are, to a certain extent, still necessary for self-protection. Let us hope, then, that something will ore long be done to prevent disasters pregnant with so many evils to the community, and reflecting so strongly on the United States as a nation.[S] Having gone off at a tangent, like a boomerang, I had better, like the same weapon, return whence I started—in military language, "as you was."

The cold indifference to these events from all social classes, with only a few exceptions, is shocking to an outsider and clearly shows the damaging moral effects of getting used to such horrors. The bowie knife, the revolver, and the river accidents influence each other, and no real moral improvement can be expected until a significant change happens. The government can intervene with the accidents; however, deadly weapons are still somewhat necessary for self-defense. So, let’s hope that something will soon be done to prevent disasters that bring so many problems to the community and reflect poorly on the United States as a nation.[S] Having digressed, like a boomerang, I should return to where I started—using military terms, "as you were."


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

On the Mississippi a cord contains one definite quantity, being a pile 1 feet high, 4 feet broad, and 8 feet long, and does not vary in size in the same absurd manner as it does in various parts of England: the price paid is from eight to thirteen shillings, increasing as you descend the river.


A committee of the United States calculated that, in 1846, the losses on the Mississippi amounted to 500,000l.; and as commerce has increased enormously, while precautions have remained all but stagnant, I think it may be fairly estimated, that the annual losses at the present day amount to at least 750,000l.


Vide chapter on "Watery Highways."


Since writing the above, some more stringent regulations as to inspection have appeared, similar to those advocated in the text; but they contain nothing respecting loading, steering, &c. In fact, they are general laws, having 110 especial bearing on Western waters.



CHAPTER XI.

New Orleans.




New Orleans is a surprising evidence of what men will endure, when cheered by the hopes of an ever-flowing tide of all-mighty dollars and cents. It is situated on a marsh, and bounded by the river on one side, and on the other by a continuation of the marsh on which it is built, beyond which extends a forest swamp. All sewerage and drainage is superficial—more generally covered in, but in very many places dragging its sluggish stream, under the broad light of day, along the edges of the footway. The chief business is, of course, in those streets skirting the river; and at this season—December—when the cotton and sugar mania is at its height, the bustle and activity is marvellous. Streets are piled in every direction with mounds of cotton, which rise as high as the roofs; storehouses are bursting with bales; steam and hydraulic presses hiss in your ear at every tenth step, and beneath their power the downy fibre is compressed into a substance as hard as Aberdeen granite, which semi-nude negroes bind, roll, and wheel in all directions, the exertion keeping them in perpetual self-supplying animal steam-baths. Gigantic mules arrive incessantly, dragging fresh freight for pressure; while others as incessantly depart, bearing freight for embarkation to Europe. If a pair of cotton socks could be made vocal, what a tale of sorrow and labour their history would reveal, from the nigger who picked with a sigh to the maiden who donned with a smile.

New Orleans is a surprising example of what people will endure when motivated by the promise of a never-ending flow of money. It’s located on a marsh, bordered by the river on one side and an expanse of marshland on the other, with a forested swamp beyond that. All the sewage and drainage systems are superficial—mostly covered but often visible, dragging their sluggish waters along the edges of the sidewalks in broad daylight. The main business is, of course, along the streets by the river; and during this time—December—when the cotton and sugar frenzy is at its peak, the hustle and bustle is incredible. Streets are filled in every direction with piles of cotton that rise as high as roofs; warehouses are overflowing with bales; steam and hydraulic presses hiss in your ear with every tenth step, compressing the soft fiber into a substance as hard as granite, which semi-naked workers bind, roll, and transport in all directions, their efforts keeping them in constant, self-sustaining sweat baths. Huge mules arrive nonstop, bringing in fresh loads for pressing; while others leave just as frequently, carrying shipments bound for Europe. If a pair of cotton socks could talk, what a story of sorrow and toil their journey would tell, from the laborer who picked with a sigh to the young woman who wore them with a smile.

Some idea may be formed of the extent of this branch of trade, from the statistical fact that last year the export amounted to 1,435,815 bales[T]—or, in round numbers, one and a half millions—which was an increase of half a million upon the exports of the preceding twelve months. Tobacco is also an article of great export, and amounted last year to 94,000 hogsheads, being an increase of two-thirds upon the previous twelve months. The great staple produce of the neighbourhood is sugar and molasses. In good years, fifty gallons of molasses go to a thousand pounds of sugar; but, when the maturity of the cane is impeded by late rains, as was the case last year, seventy gallons go to the thousand pounds of sugar. Thus, in 1853, 10,500,000 gallons of molasses were produced, representing 210,000,000 pounds of sugar; while, in 1854, 18,300,000 gallons of molasses were produced, being nearly double the produce of the preceding year, but representing only 261,500,000 pounds of sugar,—owing, as before explained, to the wet weather. Some general idea of the commercial activity of New Orleans may be formed from the following statistics for 1853:—2266 vessels, representing 911,000 tons, entered New Orleans; and 2202 vessels, representing 930,000 tons, cleared.

Some idea can be gained of the scale of this trade from the fact that last year the exports totaled 1,435,815 bales[T]—or roughly one and a half million—which was an increase of half a million compared to the previous year. Tobacco is also a significant export, amounting to 94,000 hogsheads last year, a growth of two-thirds over the prior twelve months. The main products in the area are sugar and molasses. In good years, fifty gallons of molasses yield a thousand pounds of sugar; however, when the growth of the cane is affected by late rains, as it was last year, it takes seventy gallons to produce the same amount of sugar. For instance, in 1853, 10,500,000 gallons of molasses were produced, translating to 210,000,000 pounds of sugar; whereas, in 1854, 18,300,000 gallons of molasses were generated, nearly double what was produced the year before, but only representing 261,500,000 pounds of sugar—due to the wet conditions mentioned earlier. A general idea of New Orleans' commercial activity can be illustrated by the following statistics from 1853: 2,266 vessels, totaling 911,000 tons, entered New Orleans; and 2,202 vessels, totaling 930,000 tons, cleared.

Now, of course, the greater portion—or I might almost say the whole—of the goods exported reach New Orleans by the Mississippi, and therefore justify the assertion that the safe navigation of that river is, in the fullest sense of the term, a national and not a local interest, bearing as it does on its bosom an essential portion of the industrial produce of eleven different States of the Union.

Now, of course, most of the goods exported—I'd even say nearly all of them—arrive in New Orleans via the Mississippi River. This confirms that safe navigation of that river is truly a national issue, not just a local one, as it carries a vital part of the industrial output from eleven different states in the Union.

It is quite astounding to see the legions of steamers from the upper country which are congregated here; for miles and miles the levee forms one unbroken line of them, all lying with their noses on shore—no room for broadsides. On arriving, piled up with goods mountain high, scarce does a bow touch the levee, when swarms of Irish and niggers rush down, and the mountainous pile is landed, and then dragged off by sturdy mules to its destination. Scarce is she cleared, when the same hardy sons of toil build another mountainous pile on board; the bell rings, passengers run, and she is facing the current and the dangers of the snaggy Mississippi. The labour of loading and unloading steamers is, as you may suppose, very severe, and is done for the most part by niggers and Irishmen. The average wages are from 7l. to 8l. per month; but, in times of great pressure from sudden demand, &c., they rise as high as from. 12l. to 14l. per month, which was the case just before my arrival. The same wages are paid to those who embark in the steamers to load and unload at the different stations on the river. Every day is a working day; and as, by the law, the slave has his Sunday to himself to earn what he can, the master who hires him out on the river is supposed to give him one-seventh of the wages earned; but I believe they only receive one-seventh of the ordinary wages—i.e., 1l. per month.

It’s pretty surprising to see the many steamers from the upper country gathered here; for miles, the levee stretches out in an unbroken line of them, all with their bows on shore—no space for broadside docking. When they arrive, stacked high with goods, barely does the bow touch the levee before swarms of Irish and Black workers rush down, offloading the towering pile, which is then hauled away by strong mules to its destination. Just as soon as one is cleared, these hard-working individuals build another huge pile on board; the bell rings, passengers hurry, and the steamer heads out into the current and the hazards of the jagged Mississippi. The work of loading and unloading steamers is, as you can imagine, quite tough, mainly done by Black and Irish workers. The average wages are between £7 to £8 per month; however, during times of high demand, they can rise to £12 to £14 per month, which was the case just before I arrived. The same pay applies to those who board the steamers to load and unload at various points along the river. Every day is a working day; and since, by law, the enslaved person has Sunday to themselves to earn what they can, the master who hires them out on the river is expected to pay them one-seventh of the earnings. But I believe they only receive one-seventh of the usual wages—meaning, £1 per month.

THE NEW ST. CHARLES HOTEL, NEW ORLEANS.

THE NEW ST. CHARLES HOTEL, NEW ORLEANS.

THE NEW ST. CHARLES HOTEL, NEW ORLEANS.

THE NEW ST. CHARLES HOTEL, NEW ORLEANS.

Let us now turn from the shipping to the town. In the old, or French part, the streets are generally very narrow; but in the American, or the La Fayette quarter, they are very broad, and, whether from indolence or some other reason, badly paved and worse cleansed; nevertheless, if the streets are dirty and muddy, the houses have the advantage of being airy. There are no buildings of any importance except the new Custom-house, and, of course, the hotels. The St. Louis is at present the largest; but the St. Charles, which is being rebuilt, was, and will again be, the hotel pride of New Orleans.[U] They are both enormous establishments, well arranged, and, with the locomotive propensities of the people, sure to be well filled during the winter months, at which period only they are open. When I arrived at the St. Louis, it was so full that the only room I could get was like a large Newfoundland dog's kennel, with but little light and less air. The hotel was originally built for an Exchange, and the rotundo in the centre is one of the finest pieces of architecture in the States. It is a lofty, vaulted hall, eighty feet in diameter, with an aisle running all round, supported by a row of fine pillars fifty feet in height; the dome rises nearly as many-feet more, and has a large skylight in the centre; the sides thereof are ornamented by well-executed works in chiaroscuro, representing various successful actions gained during the struggle for independence, and several of the leading men who figured during that eventful period. A great portion of the aisle is occupied by the all-important bar, where drinks flow as freely as the river outside; but there is another feature in the aisles which contrasts strangely with the pictorial ornaments round the dome above—a succession of platforms are to be seen, on which human flesh and blood is exposed to public auction, and the champions of the equal rights of man are thus made to endorse, as it were, the sale of their fellow-creatures.

Let’s now shift from the shipping area to the town. In the old, or French section, the streets are generally very narrow; but in the American, or La Fayette district, they are quite wide and, whether due to laziness or some other reason, poorly paved and even worse maintained. Still, while the streets are dirty and muddy, the houses benefit from being airy. There aren’t any significant buildings except for the new Custom House and, of course, the hotels. The St. Louis is currently the largest, but the St. Charles, which is being rebuilt, used to be and will again be the pride of New Orleans.[U] They are both massive establishments, well organized, and, with the locals’ tendency to travel, are sure to be busy during the winter months, which is the only time they are open. When I arrived at the St. Louis, it was so packed that the only room I could get was like a large kennel for a Newfoundland dog, with very little light and even less air. The hotel was originally built as an Exchange, and the rotunda in the center is one of the finest architectural pieces in the States. It’s a tall, vaulted hall, eighty feet in diameter, with an aisle running all around, supported by a row of beautiful pillars fifty feet high; the dome rises nearly as many feet higher and has a large skylight in the center. The sides are decorated with well-crafted works in chiaroscuro, depicting various successful actions during the fight for independence and several key figures from that impactful period. A big portion of the aisle is taken up by the essential bar, where drinks flow as freely as the river outside; however, there’s another aspect in the aisles that strikingly contrasts with the artistic decorations above the dome—a series of platforms where human beings are put up for public auction, and the advocates for equal rights are thus led to endorse, in a way, the sale of their fellow humans.

I had only been in the hotel one day when a gentleman to whom I had a letter kindly offered me a room in his house. The offer was too tempting, so I left my kennel without delay, and in my new quarters found every comfort and a hearty welcome, rendered more acceptable from the agreeable society which it included, and the tender nursing I received at the hands of one of the young ladies during the week I was confined to the house by illness. Among all the kind and hospitable friends I met with in my travels, none have a stronger claim on my grateful recollection than Mr. Egerton and his family. When able to get out, I took a drive with mine host: as you may easily imagine, there is not much scenery to be found in a marsh bounded by a forest swamp, but the effect is very curious; all the trees are covered with Spanish moss, a long, dark, fibrous substance which hangs gracefully down from every bough and twig; it is often used for stuffing beds, pillows, &e. This most solemn drapery gave the forest the appearance of a legion of mute mourners attending the funeral of some beloved patriarch, and one felt disposed to admire the patience with which they stood, with their feet in the wet, their heads nodding to and fro as if distracted with grief, and their fibrous weeds quivering, as though convulsed with the intensity of agony. The open space around is a kind of convalescent marsh; that is, canals and deep ditch drains have been opened all through it, and into these the waters of the marsh flow, as a token of gratitude for the delicate little attention; at the same time, the adjacent soil, freed from its liquid encumbrance, courts the attractive charms of the sun, and has already risen from two and a half to three and a half feet above its marshy level.

I had only been at the hotel for a day when a gentleman, to whom I had a letter, kindly offered me a room in his home. The offer was too tempting, so I quickly left my small room and found every comfort in my new place, along with a warm welcome made even better by the pleasant company it included, and the caring attention I received from one of the young ladies during the week I was stuck at home due to being sick. Among all the kind and welcoming people I encountered during my travels, none have a stronger hold on my grateful memory than Mr. Egerton and his family. Once I was well enough to go out, I took a drive with my host: as you can imagine, there isn’t much scenery to be seen in a marsh surrounded by a swamp, but the effect is quite interesting; all the trees are draped in Spanish moss, a long, dark, fibrous material that hangs gracefully from every branch and twig; it’s often used to stuff beds and pillows, etc. This solemn drapery made the forest look like a group of silent mourners attending the funeral of some beloved elder, and one couldn’t help but admire the patience with which they stood, their feet in the wet ground, their heads swaying as if lost in grief, and their fibrous strands quivering, as if they were overwhelmed with anguish. The open area around is a sort of recovering marsh; that is, canals and deep ditches have been dug throughout it, and the waters of the marsh flow into these as a sign of gratitude for the gentle care; at the same time, the surrounding land, freed from its watery burden, welcomes the warm sun and has already risen from two and a half to three and a half feet above its marshy level.

The extremity of this open space furthest from the town has been appropriately fixed upon as the site of various cemeteries. The lugubrious forest is enough to give a man the blue devils, and the ditches and drains into which the sewers, &c., of the town are pumped, dragging their sluggish and all but stagnant course under a broiling summer gun, are sufficient to prepare most mortals for the calm repose towards which the cypress and the cenotaph beckon them with greedy welcome. The open space I have been describing is the "Hyde Park" and "Rotten Row" of New Orleans, and the drive round it is one of the best roads I ever travelled; it is called the "Shell Road," from the top-dressing thereof being entirely composed of small shells, which soon bind together and make it as smooth as a bowling-green. The Two-forty trotters—when there are any—come out here in the afternoon, and show off their paces, and if you fail in finding any of that first flight, at all events you are pretty sure to see some good teams, that can hug the three minutes very closely. Custom is second nature, and necessity is the autocrat of autocrats, which even the free and enlightened must obey; the consequence is, that the inhabitants of New Orleans look forward to the Shell-road ride, or drive, with as much interest and satisfaction as our metropolitan swells do to the Serpentine or the Row.

The farthest part of this open space from the town has been chosen as the location for several cemeteries. The gloomy forest can easily give someone the blues, and the ditches and drains where the town's sewers empty, sluggishly moving under the scorching summer sun, are enough to prepare anyone for the peaceful rest that the cypress and the cenotaph invite them to with eager welcome. The open space I’m describing is the "Hyde Park" and "Rotten Row" of New Orleans, and the drive around it is one of the best roads I've ever traveled; it’s called the "Shell Road" because the surface is entirely made up of small shells, which soon bind together to create a smooth surface like a bowling green. The two-forty trotters—when there are any—come out here in the afternoon to show off their strides, and if you can’t find any of the top-tier ones, you can definitely expect to see some good teams that can come pretty close to three minutes. Tradition is second nature, and necessity is the ultimate ruler, which even the free and enlightened must follow; as a result, the people of New Orleans look forward to the Shell Road ride or drive with as much interest and satisfaction as our city folks do to the Serpentine or the Row.

Having had our drive, let us now say a few words about the society. In the first place, you will not see such grand houses as in New York; but at the same time it is to be observed, that the tenants here occupy and enjoy all their houses, while in New York, as I have before observed, the owners of many of the finest residences live almost exclusively in the basements thereof. This more social system at New Orleans, I am inclined to attribute essentially to the French—or Creole—habits with which society is leavened, and into which, it appears to me, the Americans naturally and fortunately drop. On the other hand, the rivalry which too often taints a money-making community has found its way here. If A. gives a party which costs 200l., B. will try and get up one at 300l., and so on. This false pride—foolish enough anywhere—is more striking in New Orleans, from the fact that the houses are not calculated for such displays, and when they are attempted, it involves unfurnishing bed-rooms and upsetting the whole establishment. I should add they are comparatively rare, perhaps as rare as those parties which are sometimes given in London at the expense of six weeks' fasting, in order that the donor's name and the swells who attended the festive scene may go forth to the world in the fashionable column of the Morning Post. Whenever they do occur, they are invariably attended with some such observations as the following:—

Having taken our drive, let's now say a few words about the society. First of all, you won’t see as many grand houses as in New York; however, it should be noted that the residents here fully occupy and enjoy their homes, while in New York, as I mentioned earlier, many of the owners of the finest residences mostly live in the basements. I tend to think that this more social environment in New Orleans is primarily due to the French—or Creole—traditions that influence society, which Americans seem to naturally and happily adopt. On the flip side, the competition that often clouds a money-driven community has made its way here. If A throws a party that costs 200l., B will try to host one that costs 300l, and so on. This false pride—foolish enough anywhere—stands out more in New Orleans because the houses aren’t really designed for such displays, and when they are attempted, it leads to emptying bedrooms and disrupting the entire household. I should add that these events are relatively rare, maybe as rare as those parties sometimes held in London that come at the cost of six weeks of fasting, just so the host's name and the high-profile guests can make their way into the fashionable column of the Morning Post. Whenever they do happen, they are always accompanied by comments such as the following:—

"What did Mrs. B.'s party cost last night?"

"What did Mrs. B.'s party cost last night?"

"Not less than 300l."

"At least 300l."

"Well, I'm sure they have not the means to afford such extravagant expense; and I suppose the bed-rooms upstairs were all cleared out?"

"Well, I'm sure they can't afford such extravagant expenses; and I assume the bedrooms upstairs have all been cleared out?"

"Oh, yes! three of them."

"Oh, yes! Three of them."

"Well I know that house, and, fix it how you will, if they cleared out three bed-rooms, I'm sure they must have slept on the sofas or the tables. I declare it's worse than foolish—it's wicked to have so much pride," &c.

"Well, I know that house, and no matter how you arrange it, if they cleared out three bedrooms, I’m sure they must have slept on the sofas or the tables. Honestly, it’s more than foolish—it’s wrong to have so much pride," &c.

If those who thus indulged their vanity, only heard one-half of the observations made by those who accent their hospitalities, or who strive to get invitations and cannot, they would speedily give up their folly; but money is the great Juggernaut, at the feet of which all the nations of the earth fall down and worship; whether it be the coronets that bowed themselves down in the temple of the Railway King in Hyde Park, who could afford the expense; or the free and enlightened who do homage in Mrs. ----'s temple at New Orleans, though perhaps she could not afford the expense; one thing is clear—where the money is spent, there will the masses be gathered together. General society is, however, more sober and sociable, many families opening their houses one day in the week to all their friends. The difference of caste is going out fast: the Creoles found that their intermarriages were gradually introducing a race as effete as the Bourbons appear to be in France; they are now therefore very sensibly seeking alliances with the go-ahead blood of the Anglo-Saxon, which will gradually absorb them entirely, and I expect that but little Trench will be spoken in New Orleans by the year 1900. Another advantage of the Creole element, is the taste it appears to have given for French wines. As far as I am capable of judging, the claret, champagne, and sauterne which I tasted here were superior in quality and more generally in use than I ever found them in any other city. The hours of dinner vary from half-past three to half-past five, and an unostentatious hospitality usually prevails.

If those who indulge their vanity heard just half of what people say about those who flaunt their hospitality, or those who try to get invited but can’t, they would quickly abandon their foolishness. But money is the great force that everyone worships; whether it’s the wealthy who bow in the temple of the Railway King in Hyde Park, or the free spirits who show their respect in Mrs. ----'s place in New Orleans, even if she might not be able to afford it. One thing is clear—wherever money is spent, people will gather. However, general society is more down-to-earth and friendly, with many families opening their homes one day a week to all their friends. The divide between social classes is fading fast. The Creoles realized that their intermarriages were slowly creating a group as worn out as the Bourbons seem to be in France; they are now wisely seeking alliances with the ambitious Anglo-Saxon lineage, which will eventually absorb them completely, and I expect that by the year 1900, not much French will be spoken in New Orleans. Another benefit of the Creole influence is the appreciation for French wines it seems to have fostered. From what I can tell, the claret, champagne, and sauterne I tasted here were of better quality and more commonly enjoyed than I’ve found in any other city. Dinner times vary from 3:30 PM to 5:30 PM, and a simple hospitality typically prevails.

Servants here are expensive articles. In the hotels you find Irishmen almost exclusively, and their wages vary from 2l. 8s. to 10l. per month. In private houses, women's wages range from 2l. 8s. to 4l. and men's from 6l. to 8l. the month. The residents who find it inconvenient to go to the north during the summer, cross the lake to their country villas at Passe Christianne, a pretty enough little place, far cooler and more shady than the town, and where they get bathing, &c. A small steamer carries you across in a few hours; but competition is much wanted, for their charges are treble those of the boats in the north, and the accommodation poor in comparison.

Servants here are pricey. In the hotels, you mostly find Irish workers, and their pay ranges from £2.8s. to £10 a month. In private homes, women earn between £2.8s. and £4, while men make between £6 and £8 a month. Residents who don't want to head north during the summer cross the lake to their country villas at Passe Christianne, a charming little spot that's much cooler and shadier than the town, where they can enjoy swimming, etc. A small steamer takes you across in a few hours, but competition is needed because their fares are three times those of the boats in the north, and the accommodations are lacking by comparison.

When crossing over in the steamer, I overheard a conversation which showed how early in life savage ideas are imbibed here. Two lads, the eldest about fifteen, had gone over from New Orleans to shoot ducks. They were both very gentlemanly-looking boys, and evidently attending some school. Their conversation of course turned upon fighting—when did schoolboys meet that it was not so? At last, the younger lad said—

When I was on the steamer, I overheard a conversation that revealed how early savage ideas are absorbed here. Two boys, the older one about fifteen, had traveled from New Orleans to hunt ducks. They both looked like well-mannered kids and were clearly attending some school. Their conversation naturally turned to fighting—when do schoolboys talk about anything else? Eventually, the younger boy said—

"Well, what do you think of Mike Maloney?", "Oh! Mike is very good with his fists; but I can whip him right off at rough-and-tumble."

"Well, what do you think of Mike Maloney?" "Oh! Mike is really good with his fists, but I can take him down easily in a brawl."

Now, what is "rough-and-tumble?" It consists of clawing, scratching, kicking, hair-pulling, and every other atrocity, for which, I am happy to think, a boy at an English school would be well flogged by the master, and sent to Coventry by his companions. Yet, here was as nice a looking lad as one could wish to see, evidently the son of well-to-do parents, glorying in this savage, and, as we should call it, cowardly accomplishment. I merely mention this to show how early the mind is tutored to feelings which doubtless help to pave the way for the bowie-knife in more mature years.

Now, what does "rough-and-tumble" mean? It involves clawing, scratching, kicking, hair-pulling, and all sorts of other horrible things, for which I’m glad to think a boy at an English school would get a proper beating from the teacher and be ignored by his friends. Yet, here was as nice-looking a kid as you could hope to see, obviously the son of well-off parents, taking pride in this brutal, and what we would call, cowardly skill. I just mention this to illustrate how early our minds are trained to feelings that undoubtedly help lead to the use of a knife in later years.

The theatres at New Orleans are neat and airy. Lola Montez succeeded in creating a great furore, at last. I say "at last," because, as there really is nothing in her acting above mediocrity, she received no especial encouragement at first, although she had chosen her own career in Bavaria as the subject in which to make her débût. She waited with considerable tact till she was approaching those scenes in which the mob triumph over order; and then, pretending to discover a cabal in the meagre applause she was receiving, she stopped in the middle of her acting, and, her eyes flashing fire, her face beaming brass, and her voice wild with well-assumed indignation, she cried—"I'm anxious to do my best to please the company; but if this cabal continues, I must retire!" The effect was electric. Thunders of applause followed, and "Bravo, Lolly!" resounded through the theatre, from the nigger-girl in the upper gallery to the octogenarian in the pit. When the clamour had subsided, some spicy attacks on kingcraft and the nobles followed most opportunely; the shouts were redoubled; her victory was complete. When the piece was over, she came forward to assure the company that the scenes she had been enacting were all facts in which she had, in reality, played the same part she had been representing that evening. Thunders of "Go it, Lolly! you're a game 'un, and nurthin' else!" rang all through the house as she retired, bowing. She did not appear in the character of "bowie-knifing a policeman at Berlin;" and of course she omitted some scenes said to have taken place during interviews with the king, and in which her conduct might not have been considered, strictly speaking, quite correct. She obtained further notoriety after my departure, by kicking and cuffing a prompter, and calling the proprietor a d—d scoundrel, a d—d liar, and a d—d thief, for which she was committed for trial. I may as well mention here, that the theatre was well attended by ladies. This fact must satisfy every unprejudiced mind how utterly devoid of foundation is the rumour of the ladies of America putting the legs of their pianofortes in petticoats, that their sensitive delicacy may not receive too rude a shock. Besides the theatres here, there is also an opera, the music of which, vocal and instrumental, is very second-rate. Nevertheless, I think it is highly to the credit of New Orleans that they support one at all, and sincerely do I wish them better success.

The theaters in New Orleans are clean and airy. Lola Montez finally managed to create a big fuss. I say "finally," because her acting is really just mediocre, so she didn’t get much support at first, even though she chose her own story in Bavaria to kick off her debut. She waited with impressive skill until she was about to reach those scenes where the crowd overpowers the order; then, pretending to notice a conspiracy behind the lackluster applause she was getting, she stopped mid-performance, her eyes blazing, her face glowing with boldness, and her voice filled with feigned outrage, she exclaimed—"I’m eager to do my best to entertain the audience; but if this conspiracy keeps up, I’ll have to walk away!" The reaction was electric. Thunderous applause followed, and "Bravo, Lolly!" echoed throughout the theater, from the young girl in the upper balcony to the elderly man in the front row. Once the noise died down, some sharp criticisms of the monarchy and the nobles followed just in time; the cheers grew louder, and her victory was complete. After the show, she stepped forward to assure the audience that the scenes she had performed were all true experiences where she had actually played the same role she had that evening. Thunderous cheers of "Go for it, Lolly! You're a tough one, and nothing else!" rang through the entire house as she took her bow on the way out. She didn’t perform the part of "stabbing a policeman in Berlin," and of course, she skipped over some scenes that allegedly occurred during her meetings with the king, which might not have been seen as entirely appropriate. She gained more notoriety after my departure by kicking and hitting a prompter and calling the owner a d—d scoundrel, a d—d liar, and a d—d thief, for which she was arrested for trial. I should mention here that the theater was well-attended by ladies. This fact should prove to any fair-minded person how totally unfounded the rumor is that American women put the legs of their pianos in petticoats, so their sensitive delicacy won’t take too harsh a shock. Besides the theaters here, there’s also an opera, whose music, both vocal and instrumental, is quite second-rate. Still, I think it reflects well on New Orleans that they support one at all, and I genuinely wish them better success.

The town is liberally supplied with churches of all denominations. I went one Sunday to a Presbyterian church, and was much struck on my entry at seeing all the congregation reading newspapers. Seating myself in my pew, I found a paper lying alongside of me, and, taking it up, I discovered it was a religious paper, full of anecdotes and experiences, &c., and was supplied gratis to the congregation. There were much shorter prayers than in Scotland, more reading of the Bible, the same amount of singing, but performed by a choir accompanied by an organ, the congregation joining but little. The sermon was about the usual length of one in Scotland, lasting about an hour, and extemporized from notes. The preacher was eloquent, and possessed of a strong voice, which he gave the reins to in a manner which would have captivated the wildest Highlander. The discourse delivered was in aid of foreign missions, and the method he adopted in dealing with it was—first, powerfully to attack monarchical forms of government and priestly influence, by which soft solder he seemed to win his way to their republican hearts; and from this position, he secondly set to work and fed their vanity freely, by glowing encomiums on their national deeds and greatness, and the superior perfections of their glorious constitution; whence he deduced, thirdly, that the Almighty had more especially committed to them the great work of evangelizing mankind. This discourse sounded like the political essay of an able enthusiast, and fell strangely on my ears from the lips of a Christian minister, whose province, I had always been taught to consider, was rather to foster humility than to inflame vanity. It is to be presumed he knew his congregation well, and felt that he was treading the surest road to their dollars and cents.

The town has plenty of churches from all different denominations. One Sunday, I attended a Presbyterian church and was surprised to see everyone in the congregation reading newspapers as I walked in. After sitting in my pew, I noticed a paper next to me and picked it up, discovering it was a religious publication filled with anecdotes and experiences, provided to the congregation for free. The prayers were much shorter than those in Scotland, there was more Bible reading, the same amount of singing, but it was done by a choir accompanied by an organ, with the congregation participating very little. The sermon was about the same length as those in Scotland, lasting around an hour and was improvised from notes. The preacher was eloquent and had a strong voice that he used in a way that would have captivated even the wildest Highlander. The sermon focused on supporting foreign missions, and his approach included first strongly criticizing monarchical governments and priestly influence, which seemed to win over their republican hearts. From there, he flattered their vanity with praises of their national achievements and the superiority of their glorious constitution, concluding that God had specifically entrusted them with the major task of evangelizing the world. This message sounded like a political essay from a passionate speaker and seemed odd to me coming from a Christian minister, whose role I had always understood to be about fostering humility rather than inflating egos. It's safe to say he knew his congregation well and understood that this was the best way to secure their donations.

Among other curiosities in this town is a human one, known as the Golden Man, from the quantity of that metal with which he bedizens waistcoat, fingers, &c. During my stay at New Orleans, he appeared decked with such an astounding gem, that it called forth the following notice from the press:—

Among other curiosities in this town is a human one, known as the Golden Man, due to the amount of that metal with which he adorns his waistcoat, fingers, etc. During my stay in New Orleans, he appeared decked with such an incredible gem that it prompted the following notice from the press:—

ANOTHER RING.—The "gold" person who shows himself and any

the number of gold jewelry pieces, on Sunday mornings, in the area of

The Verandah and City Hotels will soon unveil an amazing new attraction.

to amaze the locals. One might assume that he had already

ornaments enough to satisfy anyone; but he, it seems, is not one of

the stuff that everyday people are made of, and he couldn't rest

satisfied until his fingers had another ring. The new prodigy is,

like its predecessors, made of pure solid gold. It is worth $500,

and weighs almost, if not quite, a pound. This little treasure is

made for the owner's "little" finger. It's crafted by Mr. Melon,

jeweler and goldsmith on Camp Street, and is decorated with small

carved figures that stand out in bold relief and are very small

size, yet unique and expressive. The appropriate outer surface represents

the journey of Joseph, the Virgin Mary, and the baby Jesus into Egypt.

Joseph, holding a palm branch, leads the way as the Virgin follows.

sitting on a donkey, and holding the Savior in her lap. On the left

At the outer edge of the ring, the prophet Daniel can be seen, standing between

two lions. The prophet doesn't have a blue umbrella under his arm to

distinguish him from the lions. The face of the ring displays an

great design of the crucifixion, featuring the three crosses and the

Savior and the two thieves were hung there. This ring is definitely

a curiosity.

There is a strong body of police here, and some of their powers are autocratically autocratic: thus, a person once committed as a vagrant is liable to be re-imprisoned by them if met in the street unemployed. Now, as it is impossible to expect that people in business will take the trouble to hunt up vagrants, what can be conceived more cruelly arbitrary than preventing them from hunting up places for themselves? Yet such is the law in this democratic city.[V] A gentleman told me of a vagrant once coming to him and asking for employment, and, on his declining to employ him, begging to be allowed to lie concealed in his store during the day, lest the police should re-imprison him before he could get on board one of the steamers to take him up the river to try his fortunes elsewhere. At the same time, a person in good circumstances getting into difficulties can generally manage to buy his way out.

There’s a large police presence here, and some of their powers are overly authoritarian: if someone has been labeled as a vagrant, they can be thrown back in jail if they’re found on the streets without a job. It’s unrealistic to expect business owners to go searching for vagrants, so what could be more harshly arbitrary than stopping them from trying to find work for themselves? Yet, that’s the law in this so-called democratic city. [V] One gentleman told me about a vagrant who approached him looking for work, and when he turned him down, the vagrant pleaded to be allowed to hide in his store during the day, fearing that the police would throw him back in jail before he could board one of the boats to head up the river and seek his luck elsewhere. Meanwhile, someone who is well-off but falls into trouble can usually find a way to buy their way out.

The authorities, on the return of Christmas, having come to the conclusion that the letting off of magazines of crackers in the streets by the juvenile population was a practice attended with much inconvenience and danger to those who were riding and driving, gave orders that it should be discontinued. The order was complied with in some places, but in others the youngsters set it at defiance. It will hardly be credited that, in a nation boasting of its intelligence and proud of its education, the press should take part with the youngsters, and censure the magistrates for their sensible orders. Yet such was the case at New Orleans. The press abused the authorities for interfering with the innocent amusements of the children, and expressed their satisfaction at the latter having asserted their independence and successfully defied the law. The same want of intelligence was exhibited by the press in censuring the authorities for discontinuing the processions on the anniversary of the Battle of New Orleans—"a ceremony calculated to excite the courage and patriotism of the people." They seem to lose sight of the fact, that it is a reflection on the courage of their countrymen to suppose that they require such processions to animate their patriotism, and that the continuance of such public demonstrations parading the streets betokens rather pride of past deeds than confidence in their power to re-enact them. Although such demonstrations may be readily excused, or even reasonably encouraged, in an infant community struggling for liberty, they are childish and undignified in a powerful nation. What would be more ridiculous than Scotland having grand processions on the anniversary of Bannockburn, or England on that of Waterloo? Moreover, in a political point of view, it should not be lost sight of, that if such demonstrations have any effect at all on the community, it must be that of reviving hostile feelings towards those to whom they are united most closely by the ties of blood, sense, and—though last, not least—cents. I merely mention these trivial things to show the punyizing effects which the democratic element has on the press.

The authorities, upon the arrival of Christmas, concluded that allowing kids to set off firecrackers in the streets was causing a lot of inconvenience and danger for drivers and riders, and they ordered it to stop. Some places followed the order, but in others, the kids ignored it completely. It's hard to believe that in a country that prides itself on intelligence and education, the media would side with the kids and criticize the officials for their reasonable decision. Yet, that was exactly what happened in New Orleans. The press criticized the authorities for interfering with the children's innocent fun and expressed approval of the kids for standing up against the law. The same lack of understanding was shown by the media when they criticized the authorities for canceling the parades on the anniversary of the Battle of New Orleans—“a ceremony meant to inspire courage and patriotism in the people.” They seemed to forget that it reflects poorly on the bravery of their fellow citizens to think they need such parades to boost their patriotism, and that continuing these public displays is more about pride in past achievements than confidence in their ability to repeat them. While such displays might be understandable or even encouraged in a young community fighting for freedom, they seem childish and undignified for a strong nation. What would be more absurd than Scotland holding grand parades for Bannockburn or England for Waterloo? Furthermore, from a political standpoint, it’s important to remember that if these parades have any impact on the community, it’s likely to revive negative feelings toward those they are most closely connected to by family, understanding, and—last but not least—money. I only bring up these minor points to illustrate the weakening effects that democratic elements have on the media.

Formerly, duels were as innumerable here as bales of cotton; they have considerably decreased latterly, one cause of which has been, the State of Louisiana passing a law by which any person engaging in a duel is at once deprived of his vote, and disabled from holding any state employment. John Bull may profit by this hint.

Previously, duels were as countless here as cotton bales; they have significantly declined lately, one reason being that the state of Louisiana passed a law that instantly strips anyone who participates in a duel of their voting rights and disqualifies them from holding any state job. John Bull might take note of this advice.

I was much amused, during my stay at New Orleans, by hearing the remarks of the natives upon the anti-slavery meeting at Stafford House, of which the papers were then full. If the poor duchess and her lady allies had been fiends, there could scarcely have been more indignation at her "presumptuous interference" and "mock humility." Her "sisters, indeed! as if she would not be too proud to stretch out her hand to any one of them," &c. Then another would break out with, "I should like to know by what right she presumes to interfere with us and offer advice? If she wants to do good, she has opportunities enough of exercising her charity in London. Let any one read The Times, and then visit a plantation here, and say whether the negroes are not happier and better off than one-half of the lower classes in England," &c. If every animadversion which the duchess and her colleagues' kind intentions and inoffensive wording of them called forth in America had been a pebble, and if they had all been gathered together, the monument of old Cheops at Ghizeh would have sunk into insignificance when contrasted with the gigantic mass; in short, no one unacquainted with the sensitiveness of the American character can form a conception of the violent state of indignation which followed the perusal of the proceedings of that small conclave of English lady philanthropists. Mrs. Jones, Smith, Adams, and Brown might have had their meeting on the same subject without producing much excitement; but when the aristocratic element was introduced, it acted as a spark in a barrel of gunpowder. As an illustration of the excitement produced, I subjoin an extract from one of their daily papers, under the heading of "Mrs. Stowe in Great Britain:"—

I was greatly entertained during my time in New Orleans by the locals' comments on the anti-slavery meeting at Stafford House, which the newspapers were buzzing about. If the poor duchess and her lady friends had been demons, there could hardly have been more outrage over her "presumptuous interference" and "mock humility." Her "sisters, indeed! As if she wouldn’t be too proud to reach out to any one of them," etc. Then another person would chime in, "I'd like to know what right she has to interfere with us and give advice? If she wants to do good, she has plenty of chances to show her charity in London. Let anyone read The Times, then visit a plantation here, and see if the Black people aren’t happier and better off than half of the lower classes in England," etc. If every criticism that the duchess and her colleagues’ good intentions and innocuous words provoked in America had been a pebble, and if they were all collected, the Great Pyramid of Giza would look tiny in comparison to the massive heap; in short, no one unfamiliar with the sensitivity of the American character can imagine the intense outrage that followed the reading of the proceedings from that small gathering of English lady philanthropists. Mrs. Jones, Smith, Adams, and Brown might have held their meeting on the same topic without stirring much drama; but as soon as the aristocratic element was involved, it acted like a spark in a barrel of gunpowder. To illustrate the excitement generated, I’m including an excerpt from one of their daily papers titled "Mrs. Stowe in Great Britain:"—

"The principles of free government that were developed here, and encouraging our __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__,

people advancing with unprecedented speed in the pursuit of wealth and

Greatness has always been a source of concern for monarchs and

aristocracies—of enjoyment and optimism for the people. It has, of course,

been the target of the former to tarnish our image in every possible way,

and to make us loathed in the eyes of the world. There has been

nothing since the revolution has been so carefully planned to achieve this goal,

as the exhibition that Mrs. Stowe is having in England.

"They have a strong and lasting hostility towards this country,"

and to republicanism in general, that the elite, not only of

England, and indeed all of Europe, have taken hold of __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ with great eagerness.

Uncle Tom, and have worked so hard to get a triumphant

march for its author through all the areas she decides to visit.

They are thrilled to meet someone from the United States—of that

a republic that has shown that a people can thrive without an

aristocracy or a monarch—of that republic, the example of which

Prosperity was slowly eroding thrones and creating a trap for

privileged classes—describing her country as the worst, the most

abandoned, the most despicable that ever existed. Royalty creates a long

Breath, and privilege recovers from its fears. Among the people of the

continent, particularly among the Germans, Italians, and Russians, there

There are thousands who think that murder is just a hobby here—that the

A bowie knife and pistol are used in response to any provocation—that, in fact,

we are a nation of assassins, without law, without morality, and

without religion. They are taught to believe these things by their

newspapers, which are published with government oversight, allow no

intelligence but about murders, bowie knife fights, etc., coming from

America, to be featured in their articles. Therefore, it is only through these that

America is known to their readers, and they are very careful to instill

the belief that if America is a land of murderers, it is due to

It has made the mistake of setting up a republican form of government.

These ideas are quite common in England, even where the hostility is

greater than it is in Europe. We owe slavery to British greed.

In this country, we owe the promotion of British hatred to

anti-slavery movement right now. The disgusting hypocrisy that has

characterized the entire process is not the least bit objectionable

The English don't care at all about slavery. If they did,

Why do they maintain it in such great shape in their own country?

Where has there ever been true charity that didn't start at home? It is

because there is a deep-seated hostility toward this country that permeates the

"the entire British mindset that these things have happened."

The wounded sensitiveness, however, which the foregoing paragraph exhibits, found some consolation from an article which appeared in The Times. They poured over its lines with intense delight, soothing themselves with each animadversion it made upon the meeting, and deducing from the whole—though how, I could never understand—that they had found in the columns of that journal a powerful advocate for slavery. Thus was peace restored within their indignant breasts, and perhaps a war with the ladies of the British aristocracy averted. Of two facts, however, I feel perfectly certain; one is, that the animadversions made in America will not in the least degree impair her Grace's healthy condition; and the other is, that the meeting held at Stafford House will in no way improve the condition of the negro.

The wounded sensitivity shown in the previous paragraph found some comfort from an article that appeared in The Times. They eagerly absorbed its content, calming themselves with each criticism of the meeting, and somehow concluded—though I could never figure out how—that they had discovered in the pages of that newspaper a strong supporter of slavery. This restored peace within their outraged hearts, and perhaps prevented a conflict with the women of the British aristocracy. However, I am completely sure of two things: one is that the criticism coming from America won’t affect her Grace’s well-being at all; and the other is that the meeting at Stafford House won’t improve the situation for the negro.

There are two or three clubs established here, into one of which strangers are admitted as visitors, but the one which is considered the "first chop" does not admit strangers, except by regular ballot; one reason, I believe, for their objecting to strangers, is the immense number of them, and the quality of the article. Their ideas of an English gentleman, if formed from the mass of English they see in this city, must be sufficiently small: there is a preponderating portion of the "cotton bagman," many of whom seek to make themselves important by talking large. Although probably more than nine out of ten never have "thrown their leg" over anything except a bale of cotton, since the innocent days of the rocking-horse, they try to impress Jonathan by pulling up their shirt-collar consequentially, and informing him,—"When I was in England, I was used to 'unt with the Dook's 'ounds; first-rate, sir, first-rate style—no 'ats, all 'unting-caps." Then, passing his left thumb down one side of his cheek, his fingers making a parallel course down the opposite cheek, with an important air and an expression indicative of great intimacy, he would condescendingly add,—"The Dook wasn't a bad chap, after all: he used to give me a capital weed now and then." With this style of John Bull in numerical ascendency, you cannot wonder at the club-doors not being freely opened to "the Dook's friends," or at the character of an English gentleman being imperfectly understood.

There are two or three clubs set up here; one of them allows strangers as visitors, but the one that's considered the "top club" only lets in outsiders through a formal voting process. One reason for their reluctance to accept strangers is the huge number of them and their questionable quality. If their idea of an English gentleman is shaped by the average English visitors in this city, it must be pretty low: most are "cotton merchants," many of whom try to seem important by boasting. Even though more than nine out of ten haven’t "thrown their leg" over anything except a cotton bale since they were kids playing on rocking horses, they attempt to impress people by pulling up their shirt collars and saying, “When I was in England, I used to hunt with the Duke’s hounds; first-rate, sir, first-rate style—no hats, all hunting caps.” Then, while running his left thumb down one side of his face and his fingers down the opposite side in a self-important manner, he would smugly add, “The Duke wasn’t a bad guy after all: he used to give me a great cigar now and then.” With this type of John Bull in large numbers, it's no surprise that club doors aren’t opened widely to "the Duke's friends," or that the concept of an English gentleman is not well understood.

Time hurries on, a passport must be obtained, and that done, it must be viséd before the Spanish consul, as Cuba is my destination. The Filibusteros seem to have frightened this functionary out of his proprieties. A Spaniard is proverbially proud and courteous—the present specimen was neither; perhaps the reason may have been that I was an Englishman, and that the English consul had done all his work for him gratis when the Filibustero rows obliged him to fly. Kindness is a thing which the Spaniards as a nation find it very difficult to forgive. However, I got his signature, which was far more valuable than his courtesy; most of his countrymen would have given me both, but the one sufficed on the present occasion. Portmanteaus are packed—my time is come.

Time is moving fast, I need to get a passport, and once that’s done, it has to be viséd by the Spanish consul since Cuba is my destination. The Filibusteros seem to have scared this official out of his proper behavior. A Spaniard is typically known for being proud and polite, but this one was neither; maybe it was because I was English, and the English consul had taken care of everything for him gratis when the Filibustero crews forced him to leave. Spaniards as a nation struggle to forgive kindness. Still, I got his signature, which was much more important than his courtesy; most of his fellow countrymen would have offered me both, but just the signature was enough for now. My bags are packed—my time has come.

Adieu, New Orleans!--adieu, kind host and amiable family, and a thousand thanks for the happy days I spent under your roof. Adieu, all ye hospitable friends, not forgetting my worthy countryman the British consul. The ocean teapot is hissing, the bell rings, friends cry, kiss, and smoke—handkerchiefs flutter in the breeze, a few parting gifts are thrown on board by friends who arrive just too late; one big-whiskered fellow with bushy moustache picks up the parting cadeau—gracious me! he opens it, and discloses a paper bag of lollipops; another unfolds a precious roll of chewing tobacco. Verily, extremes do meet. The "Cherokee" is off, and I'm aboard. Down we go, sugar plantations studding either shore; those past, flat dreary banks succeed; ships of all nations are coming up and going down by the aid of tugboats; two large vessels look unpleasantly "fixed"—they are John Bull and Jonathan, brothers in misfortune and both on a bank.

Goodbye, New Orleans! Goodbye, kind host and lovely family, and a thousand thanks for the wonderful days I spent under your roof. Goodbye, all you welcoming friends, especially my good fellow countryman, the British consul. The ocean whistle is blowing, the bell rings, friends shout, kiss, and smoke—handkerchiefs wave in the breeze, a few farewell gifts are thrown on board by friends who arrive just a bit too late; one big-bearded guy with a bushy mustache picks up a farewell cadeau—wow! he opens it and finds a paper bag of lollipops; another reveals a precious roll of chewing tobacco. Truly, opposites attract. The "Cherokee" is leaving, and I'm on board. Down we go, with sugar plantations lining both shores; beyond that, flat, dreary banks take over; ships from all over are coming and going with the help of tugboats; two large vessels look rather stuck—they are John Bull and Jonathan, brothers in misfortune, both grounded.

"I guess the pilots will make a good thing out of that job!" says my neighbour.—

"I guess the pilots will make the most out of that job!" says my neighbor.—

"Pilots!" I exclaimed, "how can that be? I should think they stood a fair chance of losing their licence."

"Pilots!" I shouted, "how is that possible? I would think they have a good chance of losing their license."

"Ah! sir, we don't fix things that way here; the pilots are too 'cute, sir." Upon inquiry, I found that, as the banks were continually shifting, it was, as my friend said, very difficult "to fix the pilots,"—a fact which these worthies take every advantage of, for the purpose of driving a most profitable trade in the following manner. Pilot goes to tug and says, "What do you charge for getting a ship off?" The price understood, a division of the spoil is easily agreed upon. Away goes the pilot, runs the ship on shore on the freshest sandbank, curses the Mississippi and everything else in creation; a tug comes up very opportunely, a tidy bargain is concluded; the unfortunate pilot forfeits 100l., his pilotage from the ship, and consoles himself the following evening by pocketing 500l. from the tugman as his share of the spoil, and then starts off again in search of another victim. Such, I was informed by practical people, is a common feature in the pilotage of these waters, and such it appears likely to continue.

"Ah! sir, we don’t do things that way here; the pilots are too clever, sir." When I asked for more details, I found out that since the banks are always shifting, it’s, as my friend mentioned, very tough "to fix the pilots"—a fact that these guys take full advantage of to run a pretty profitable operation. The pilot goes to the tug and says, "How much do you charge to get a ship off?" Once the price is understood, they easily agree on how to split the profits. The pilot then heads out, intentionally runs the ship aground on a fresh sandbank, curses the Mississippi and everything else in existence; a tug shows up just in time, a nice deal is made; the unfortunate pilot loses £100 from his pilotage on the ship, but consoles himself the next evening by pocketing £500 from the tugman as his share of the profits, and then he sets off again looking for another target. This, I was told by some knowledgeable people, is a common occurrence in the pilotage of these waters, and it seems likely to keep happening.

The "Cherokee" is one of those vessels which belong to Mr. Law, of whom I could get no information, expect that he had sprung up like a mushroom to wealth and Filibustero notoriety. He is also the custodian, I believe, of the three hundred thousand stand of arms ordered by Kossuth for the purpose of "whipping" Russia and Austria, and establishing the Republic of Hungary, unless by accident he found brains enough to become a Hungarian Louis Napoleon; but Mr. Law's other vessel, called the "Crescent City," and the Cuban Black Douglas, yclept "Purser Smith," are perhaps better known. Peradventure, you imagine this latter to be a wild hyena-looking man, with radiant red hair, fiery ferret eyes, and his pockets swelled out with revolutionary documents for the benefit of the discontented Cubans; but I can inform you, on the best authority, such is not the case, for he was purser of the "Cherokee" this voyage. He looks neither wild nor rabid, and is a grey-headed man, about fifty years of age, with a dash of the Israelite in his appearance: he may or he may not have Filibustero predilections—I did not presume to make inquiry on the subject. And here I cannot but remark upon the childish conduct of the parties concerned in the ridiculous "Crescent City and Cuba question," although, having taken the view they did, the Spaniards were of course perfectly right in maintaining it. It was unworthy of the Spanish nation to take notice of the arrival of so uninfluential a person as Purser Smith; and it was imprudent, inasmuch as it made him a person of importance, and gave the party with whom he was supposed to be connected a peg to hang grievances upon, and thus added to their strength. It was equally unworthy of Mr. Law, when objection was made, and a notification sent that Mr. Smith would not be admitted nor the vessel that carried him, to persist in a course of conduct obnoxious to a friendly power; and it was imprudent, when it must have been obvious that he could not carry his point; thereby eventually adding strength to the Spanish authority. When, all the fuss and vapour was made by Mr. Law and his friends, they seemed to have forgotten the old adage, "People who live in glass houses should not throw stones." President Filmore, in his statesmanlike observations, when the subject was brought before him, could not help delicately alluding to Charleston, a city of America. Americans at Charleston claim to exercise the right—what a prostitution of the term right!--of imprisoning any of the free subjects of another nation who may enter their ports, if they are men of colour. Thus, if a captain arrives in a ship with twenty men, of whom ten are black, he is instantly robbed of half his crew during his whole stay in the harbour; and on what plea is this done? Is any previous offence charged against them? None whatever. The only plea is that it is a municipal regulation which their slave population renders indispensable. In other words, it is done lest the sacred truth should spread, that man has no right to bind his fellow-man in the fetters of slavery.[W]

The "Cherokee" is one of those boats owned by Mr. Law, about whom I could find no information, except that he seemed to have suddenly risen to wealth and notorious fame as a Filibuster. He's also, I believe, in charge of the three hundred thousand firearms ordered by Kossuth to "defeat" Russia and Austria and to establish the Republic of Hungary, unless by some chance he gets smart enough to become a Hungarian Louis Napoleon; but Mr. Law's other vessel, called the "Crescent City," and the Cuban Black Douglas, nicknamed "Purser Smith," are perhaps better known. You might imagine the latter to be a wild, hyena-like man with bright red hair, fiery ferret eyes, and pockets bulging with revolutionary papers for the benefit of disgruntled Cubans; but I can tell you, from a reliable source, that's not the case, as he was this voyage's purser on the "Cherokee." He doesn't look wild or crazy; he's a gray-haired man, about fifty years old, with a hint of an Israeli look about him: he may or may not have Filibuster leanings—I didn’t feel it was my place to ask. And I can’t help but comment on the childish behavior of those involved in the ridiculous "Crescent City and Cuba debate," although the Spaniards were certainly justified in taking the stance they did. It was beneath the Spanish nation to respond to the arrival of such an unimportant person as Purser Smith; and it was unwise, since it made him seem important and gave the group he was supposedly associated with a reason to air grievances, thus strengthening their position. It was equally unworthy of Mr. Law to persist in a course of action that angered a friendly nation when a notice was sent stating that Mr. Smith and the vessel he came in would not be allowed entry; it was obvious he wouldn’t succeed, ultimately strengthening Spanish authority. When all the fuss and drama was stirred up by Mr. Law and his associates, they seemed to forget the old saying, "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones." President Filmore, in his thoughtful comments when the issue was raised, couldn’t resist subtly referencing Charleston, an American city. People in Charleston claim the right—what a misuse of the term right!—to imprison any free citizens of another nation who arrive in their ports if they are black. So, if a captain comes in a ship with twenty crew members, of whom ten are black, he instantly loses half his crew for the entire time he’s in port; and on what grounds is this done? Is there any previous wrongdoing alleged against them? None at all. The only justification is that it’s a municipal regulation that their slave population makes necessary. In other words, it’s done to prevent the spreading of the sacred truth that no one has the right to enslave another person.[W]

Was there ever such a farce as for a nation that tolerates such a municipal regulation as this to take umbrage at any of their citizens being, on strong suspicions of unfriendly feeling, denied entry into any port? Why, if there was a Chartist riot in monarchical England, and the ports thereof were closed against the sailors of republican America, they could have no just cause of offence, so long as the present municipal law of Charleston exists. What lawful boast of freedom can there ever be, where contact with freemen is dreaded, be their skins black or any colour of the rainbow? Why can England offer an asylum to the turbulent and unfortunate of all countries and climes?—Because she is perfectly free! Don't be angry, my dear Anglo-Saxon brother; you know, "if what I say bayn't true, there's no snakes in Warginny." I feel sure you regret it; but then why call forth the observations, by supporting the childish obstinacy in the "Crescent City" affair. However, as the housemaids say, in making up quarrels, "Let bygones be bygones." Spain has maintained her rights; you have satisfied her, and quiet Mr. Smith enters the Havana periodically, without disturbing the Governor's sleep or exciting the hopes of the malcontents. May we never see the Great Empire States in such an undignified position again!

Was there ever a bigger joke than a nation that allows a local law like this to get upset when some of its citizens are denied entry to a port based on strong suspicions of unfriendliness? If there was a Chartist riot in monarchical England, and its ports were closed to sailors from republican America, they wouldn’t have any real reason to be offended, as long as Charleston's current laws exist. What kind of claim to freedom can there be when there's fear of interacting with free people, regardless of whether their skin is black or any color of the rainbow? Why can England provide refuge to the restless and unfortunate from all over the world? — Because she is completely free! Don't take this the wrong way, dear Anglo-Saxon brother; you know, "if what I'm saying isn't true, there are no snakes in Virginia." I'm sure you regret this, but why bring it up by supporting the childish stubbornness in the "Crescent City" matter? But as housemaids say when resolving conflicts, "Let bygones be bygones." Spain has held onto her rights; you’ve appeased her, and calm Mr. Smith enters Havana regularly without disturbing the Governor’s sleep or raising hopes among the dissatisfied. May we never find the Great Empire States in such an undignified position again!

Here we are still in the "Cherokee;" she is calculated to hold some hundreds of passengers. Thank God! there are only some sixty on board; but I do not feel equally grateful for their allowing me to pay double price for a cabin to myself when two-thirds of them are empty, not to mention that the single fare is eight guineas. She is a regular old tub of a boat; the cabins are profitably fitted with three beds in each, one above the other; the consequence is, that if you wish to sneeze at night, you must turn on your side, or you'll break your nose against the bed above you in the little jerk that usually accompanies the sternutatory process. The feeding on board is the worst I ever saw—tough, cold, and greasy, the whole unpleasantly accompanied with dirt.

Here we are still on the "Cherokee;" it’s designed to hold several hundred passengers. Thank God! there are only about sixty on board; but I don’t feel equally grateful for having to pay double for a cabin to myself when two-thirds of them are empty, not to mention that the single fare is eight guineas. It’s a real old tub of a boat; the cabins are packed with three beds each, one above the other; as a result, if you want to sneeze at night, you have to turn on your side, or you’ll break your nose against the bed above you in the little jolt that usually comes with sneezing. The food on board is the worst I’ve ever seen—tough, cold, and greasy, all unpleasantly accompanied by dirt.

Having parted from my travelling companion at New Orleans, one of my first endeavours was, by the aid of physiognomy, to discover some passenger on whom it might suit me to inflict my society. Casting my eyes around, they soon lit upon a fair-haired youth with a countenance to match, the expression thereof bespeaking kindness and intelligence; and when, upon further examination, I saw the most indubitable and agreeable evidence that his person and apparel were on the most successful and intimate terms with soap and water, I pounced upon him without delay, and soon found that he was a German gentleman travelling with his brother-in-law, and they both had assumed an incognito, being desirous of avoiding that curious observation which, had their real position in life been known, they would most inevitably have been subject to. Reader, be not you too curious, for I cannot withdraw the veil they chose to travel under; suffice it to know, their society added much to my enjoyment, both on the passage and at the Havana. The sailing of the vessel is so ingeniously managed, that you arrive at the harbour's mouth just after sunset, and are consequently allowed the privilege of waiting outside all night, no vessels except men-of-war being allowed to enter between sunset and daybreak. The hopes of the morrow were our only consolation, until at early dawn we ran through the narrow battery-girt entrance, and dropped anchor in the land-locked harbour of Havana.

After parting ways with my travel companion in New Orleans, one of my first efforts was to use my skills in reading faces to find a passenger with whom I could spend time. As I looked around, my eyes landed on a fair-haired young man whose face matched it, showing kindness and intelligence; and when I took a closer look, I saw clear and encouraging signs that he and his clothes were on good terms with soap and water. I approached him without hesitation and soon discovered that he was a German gentleman traveling with his brother-in-law. They both were in disguise, wanting to avoid the prying eyes that would have certainly followed them if their true status were known. Reader, don’t be too curious, for I can’t reveal the identity they chose to keep hidden; just know that their company greatly enhanced my enjoyment both during the trip and in Havana. The ship’s sailing is arranged so cleverly that you reach the harbor's entrance just after sunset, which means you have to wait outside all night since only warships are allowed to enter between sunset and dawn. Our only consolation was the promise of the next day until early morning when we navigated through the narrow, fortified entrance and dropped anchor in the sheltered harbor of Havana.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

This was written in January, 1853.—The bale may be roughly estimated at 450 lbs.


This hotel has long since been re-opened.


All large cities in America must of necessity be democratic.


I have since heard that the Charleston authorities allow the captains of vessels to keep their coloured crew on board, under penalty of a heavy fine in case they land.



CHAPTER XII.

The Queen of the Antilles.




It was a lovely morning, not a cloud in the sky; the harbour was as smooth as a mirror, and bright with the rays of a sun which had reached that height at which—in tropical climates—it gilds and gladdens the scene without scorching the spectator; the quay was lined with ships loading and unloading; small boats were flying about in every direction; all around was gay and fresh, but the filthy steamer was still beneath me. I lost no time in calling a skiff alongside; then, shaking the dust from off my feet, I was soon pulling away for the shore.

It was a beautiful morning, with not a cloud in the sky; the harbor was as calm as glass, shining with the rays of the sun, which had risen to that point where—in tropical climates—it brightens the scene without burning the onlooker. The dock was filled with ships loading and unloading; small boats were darting around in every direction; everything nearby felt cheerful and fresh, but the dirty steamer was still beneath me. I quickly called a small boat over; then, brushing the dust off my feet, I was soon rowing toward the shore.

As a matter of course, the Custom-house is the landing-place, and the great object of search seems to be for Filibustero papers, or books which advocate that cause. Having passed this ordeal, you take your first drive in the national vehicle of the island, which rejoices in the appellation of a "Volante," a name given it, I suppose, in bitter sarcasm; a "Tortugante" would have been far more appropriate, inasmuch as the pace resembles that of a tortoise far more than that of a bird. I may here as well describe one of the best, of which, in spite of its gay appearance, I feel sure the bare sight would have broken the heart of "Humanity Dick of Galway."

As usual, the Custom-house is where you arrive, and the main focus of their search seems to be for Filibustero papers or books that support that cause. After going through this process, you take your first ride in the island’s national vehicle, which is called a "Volante." I assume it got that name as a sarcastic joke; "Tortugante" would have been much more fitting since its speed is definitely closer to that of a tortoise than a bird. Here, I might as well describe one of the best ones, which, despite its bright appearance, I’m sure would have broken the heart of "Humanity Dick of Galway" at just a glance.

From the point of the shaft to the axle of the wheel measures fifteen feet, and as the wheel varies in diameter from six to seven feet, it of course extends three feet beyond the axle. The body is something like a swell private cab, the leather at the back being moveable, so as to admit air, and a curtain is fitted in front joining the head of the cab and the splash-board, for the sake of shade, if needed; this body is suspended on strong leather springs, attached to the axle at one end, and to a strengthening-piece across the shafts, seven and a half feet distance from the axle, at the other. The point of the shaft is fitted with rings, by which it hangs on the back-pad of the horse, whose head necessarily extends about four feet beyond; thus you will observe, that from the outer tire of the wheel to the horse's nose occupies at least twenty-two feet, and that the poor little animal has the weight of the carriage lying on him at the end of a lever fifteen feet long. Owing to their great length, it is excessively difficult to turn them; a "Tommy Onslow" would cut in and out with a four-in-hand fifteen miles an hour, where the poor Volante would come to a regular fix—if the horses in Cuba came into power, they would burn every one of them the next minute. It must however be admitted that they are excessively easy to ride in, and peculiarly suited to a country with bad roads, besides being the gayest-looking vehicles imaginable; the boxes of the wheels, the ends of the axle, the springs for the head, the bar to keep the feet off the splash-board, the steps, the points of the fastenings of carriage and harness are all silvered and kept bright. Nor does the use of the precious metal stop here; the niggers who bestride the poor horses are put into high jack-boots fitted with plated buckles and huge spurs, both equally brilliant. These niggers have a most comical appearance; they wear a skull-cap, or a handkerchief under a gold-banded hat; some wear a red short-tailed jacket, the seams and the front of the collar covered with bright yellow, on which are dispersed innumerable emblazonments of heraldry, even to the very tails, which I should hardly have expected to find thus gaily decorated,—it may have been from this practice we have derived the expression of the seat of honour. The jack-boots they wear sometimes fit very tight to the legs, in which case poor Sambo has to roll up his pants till they assume the appearance of small bolsters tied round the knee, presenting a most ludicrous caricature. The poor little horses are all hog-maned, and their tails are neatly plaited down the whole length, the point thereof being then tied up to the crupper, so that they are as badly off as a certain class of British sheep-dog. This is probably an ancient custom, originating from a deputation of flies waiting upon the authorities, and binding themselves by treaty to leave the bipeds in peace if they would allow them the unmolested torture of the quadruped.

From the end of the shaft to the wheel axle measures fifteen feet, and since the wheel's diameter varies from six to seven feet, it extends three feet past the axle. The body resembles a stylish private cab, with a movable leather back for ventilation, and a curtain at the front connecting the cab and the splashboard for shade if needed. This body hangs on strong leather springs, attached to the axle on one end and to a supporting piece across the shafts, seven and a half feet away from the axle, on the other end. The end of the shaft has rings to hang on the horse’s back pad, which means the horse's head extends about four feet beyond. So, you can see that from the outer edge of the wheel to the horse's nose is at least twenty-two feet, and that the poor animal supports the weight of the carriage at the end of a fifteen-foot lever. Because of their great length, it's extremely hard to turn them; a "Tommy Onslow" could maneuver a four-in-hand at fifteen miles an hour, while the unfortunate Volante would be stuck—if the horses in Cuba gained strength, they'd burn them all right away. However, we must admit they are very comfortable to ride in and particularly suited for places with rough roads, in addition to being the most eye-catching vehicles imaginable. The boxes of the wheels, the ends of the axle, the head springs, the bar keeping feet off the splashboard, the steps, and the points of the carriage and harness fastenings are all silvered and kept shiny. The use of precious metal doesn’t stop there; the men riding the poor horses wear tall jack-boots with shiny buckles and large spurs, both equally dazzling. These men have a comical look; they wear a skull cap or a handkerchief under a gold-banded hat; some have a red short-tailed jacket with seams and collar fronts covered in bright yellow, adorned with countless heraldic designs, even on the tails, which I didn't expect to be so elaborately decorated—it may be from this tradition we got the term “the seat of honor.” The jack-boots they wear sometimes fit tightly around the legs, making poor Sambo roll up his pants until they look like small bolsters tied around the knees, creating a hilarious caricature. The poor little horses are all hog-maned, and their tails are neatly braided the entire length, with the tip tied to the crupper, making them as unfortunate as a certain type of British sheepdog. This is likely an ancient custom, stemming from a group of flies negotiating with the authorities, promising to leave the bipeds in peace if they were allowed to continue torturing the quadrupeds.

If the owner wishes to "make a splash," another horse, equally silvered, is harnessed abreast, something like the Russian Furieux; and in the country, where the roads on the plantations are execrable, and quite impassable for any spring carriage, a third horse is often added, the postilion always riding the near, or left-hand horse. The body of the carriage is comfortably cushioned, and lined with bright gay colours, and generally has a stunning piece of carpet for a rug. Such is the Cuban Volante, in which the Hidalgos and the Corazoncitas with glowing lustrous eyes roll about in soft undulating motion from place to place; and, believe me, such a Volante, tenanted by fairy forms lightly and gaily dressed, with a pleasant smile on their lips and an encyclopedia of language beaming from the orbs above, would arrest the attention of the most inveterate old bachelor that ever lived; nay, it might possibly give birth to a deep penitential sigh and a host of good and sensible resolutions. Ordinary Volantes are the same style of thing, only not so gay, and the usual pace is from three to five and a half miles an hour, always allowing five minutes for turning at the corner of every street. If you are curious to know why I am in such a hurry to describe a Volante, as if it were the great feature of Cuba, the reason is, simply, that my first act on landing was to get into one of the said vehicles and drive to the hotel.

If the owner wants to "make an impression," another horse, equally shiny, is hitched alongside, similar to the Russian Furieux; and in the countryside, where the roads on the plantations are terrible and nearly impossible for any spring carriage, a third horse is often added, with the postilion riding the near, or left-hand horse. The carriage body is comfortably padded, lined with bright colors, and usually features an eye-catching piece of carpet for a rug. This is the Cuban Volante, where the Hidalgos and Corazoncitas with bright, shining eyes glide smoothly from place to place; and believe me, such a Volante, filled with enchanting figures lightly and cheerfully dressed, sporting pleasant smiles and exuding charm from their lively expressions, would grab the attention of even the most hardened old bachelor alive; in fact, it might even inspire a sincere sigh and a bunch of positive, sensible resolutions. Regular Volantes are similar but not as vibrant, and the usual speed is between three and five and a half miles per hour, always allowing five minutes for turning at every street corner. If you're wondering why I'm so eager to describe a Volante, as if it's the main attraction of Cuba, it's simply because my first action upon landing was to hop into one of these vehicles and head to the hotel.

The horses are generally very neat and compact, and about the size of a very small English hack. For riding there are two kinds—the Spanish, which goes at the "rack" or amble pace, and the American, which goes the regular pace; the broad foreheads, short heads, and open nostrils show plenty of good breeding. The charges both for horses and Volante, if you wish to go out of the town, are, like everything else in Cuba, ridiculously exorbitant. An American here is doing a tolerably good business in letting horses and carriages. For a short evening drive, we had the pleasure of paying him thirty-five shillings. He says his best customers are a gang of healthy young priests, whom he takes out nearly daily to a retired country village famous for the youth and beauty of its fair sex, and who appear to be very dutiful daughters of the Church, as they are said to appreciate and profit by the kind visits of these excellent young men and their zealous labours of love.

The horses are usually neat and compact, about the size of a very small English riding horse. For riding, there are two types—the Spanish, which moves at the "rack" or amble pace, and the American, which goes at a normal pace; their broad foreheads, short heads, and open nostrils indicate good breeding. The costs for both horses and carriages, if you want to leave the town, are, like everything else in Cuba, ridiculously high. An American here is doing quite well renting out horses and carriages. For a short evening drive, we happily paid him thirty-five shillings. He says his best customers are a group of healthy young priests whom he takes out almost daily to a secluded country village known for its young and beautiful women, who seem to be very devoted daughters of the Church, as they reportedly enjoy and benefit from the kind visits of these wonderful young men and their enthusiastic efforts.

There is a very good view of the town from the top of the hotel[X]. Most of the houses have both flat and sloping roofs, the latter covered with concave red tiles, cemented together with white, thus giving them a strange freckled appearance; while in many cases the dust and dew have produced a little soil, upon which a spontaneous growth of shrubbery has sprung up; the flat roofs have usually a collection of little urn-shaped turrets round the battlement, between which are stretched clothes-lines. Here the ebony daughters of Eve, with their bullet-heads and polished faces and necks, may be seen at all hours hanging up washed clothes, their capacious mouths ornamented with long cigars, at which they puff away like steam-engines.

There’s a great view of the town from the top of the hotel[X]. Most of the houses have both flat and sloped roofs, with the sloped ones covered in concave red tiles that are cemented together in white, giving them a unique freckled look. In many cases, dust and dew have created a bit of soil, allowing for spontaneous shrub growth. The flat roofs usually feature small urn-shaped turrets around the battlements, with clotheslines stretched between them. Here, the elegant daughters of Eve, with their short hair and shiny faces and necks, can be seen at all hours hanging up laundry, their full mouths sporting long cigars, puffing away like steam engines.

One of the first sights I witnessed was a funeral, but not the solemn, imposing ceremony which that word conveys to English ears. The sides of the hearse and the upper part of the coffin were made of glass; inside lay a little girl, six or seven years old, dressed as if going to a wedding, and decorated with gay flowers. Volantes followed, bearing the mourners—or the rejoicers; I know not which is the more correct term. One or two were attired in black, but generally the colours were gay; some were quietly smoking cigars, which it is to be hoped they did that the ashes at the end thereof might afford them food for profitable reflection. Custom is said to be second nature, and I suppose, therefore, one could get habituated to this system if brought up under it; but, seen for the first time, it is more calculated to excite feelings of curiosity than solemnity. Doubtless, some fond parent's heart was bleeding deeply, and tears such as a mother only can shed were flowing freely, despite the gay bridal appearance of the whole ceremony.

One of the first things I saw was a funeral, but it wasn't the serious, grand event that word suggests to English speakers. The sides of the hearse and the top of the coffin were made of glass; inside lay a little girl, around six or seven years old, dressed as if for a wedding and adorned with bright flowers. Following the hearse were vehicles carrying the mourners—or maybe the celebrators; I'm not sure which term is more accurate. A few were dressed in black, but mostly the colors were bright; some were casually smoking cigars, which I hope they did so that the ashes might provide them with some thoughtful reflection. They say customs are like second nature, so I guess one could get used to this way of doing things if raised in it; but seen for the first time, it’s more likely to spark curiosity than solemnity. Surely, some loving parent was heartbroken, and tears that only a mother can shed were flowing freely, despite the cheerful, wedding-like atmosphere of the entire ceremony.

On my return to the hotel, I found the Press—if the slavish tool of a government can justly be designated by such a term—full of remarks upon the new British Ministry[Y], many of which were amusing enough; they showed a certain knowledge of political parties in England, and laughed good-humouredly at the bundling together in one faggot of such differently-seasoned sticks. Even the name of the Secretary of the Admiralty was honoured by them with a notice, in which they scorned to look upon him as a wild democrat. They criticised the great Peel's tail going over in a body to the enemy's camp and placing themselves at the head of the troops; but what puzzled them most was, how aquellos Grey's tan famosos por el nepotismo had not formed part of the ministry. I confess they were not more puzzled than I was to account for the mysterious combination; the only solution whereof which presented itself to my mind, was the supposition that power has the same influence on public men that lollipops have on the juvenile population, and that the one and the other are ready to sacrifice a great deal to obtain possession of the luscious morsel. However, as we live in an age of miracles, we may yet see even a rope of sand, mud, and steel-filings, hold together.—Pardon this digression, and let us back to Cuba.

On my way back to the hotel, I found the Press—if a government’s subservient tool can really be called that—full of comments about the new British Ministry[Y], many of which were entertaining enough; they showed a good understanding of political parties in England and chuckled at the awkward mix of such different individuals. They even mentioned the Secretary of the Admiralty, treating him with disdain for being seen as a wild democrat. They criticized the great Peel's followers for switching sides and joining the enemy, but what baffled them most was how aquellos Grey's tan famosos por el nepotismo didn't make it into the ministry. I admit I was just as puzzled trying to figure out the strange combination; the only explanation that came to mind was that power affects public figures like lollipops affect kids, and both are willing to sacrifice a lot to get their hands on something sweet. However, since we’re living in a time of miracles, we might even see a mixture of sand, mud, and steel filings stick together. —Pardon this digression, and let’s return to Cuba.

The Cubans usually dine about half-past three; after dinner some go to the Paseo in their Volantes, others lounge on the quay or gather round the military band before the Governor-General's palace. Look at that man with swarthy countenance, dark hair, and bright eyes—he is seated on a
stone bench listening to the music; a preserved bladder full of tobacco is open before him, a small piece of thin paper is in his hand; quick as thought a cigarette is made, and the tobacco returned to his pocket. Now he rises, and walks towards a gentleman who is smoking; when close, he raises his right hand, which holds the cigarette, nearly level with his chin, then gracefully throwing his hand forward, accompanies the act with the simple word Favor; having taken his light, the same action is repeated, followed by a courteous inclination of the head as a faintly expressed Gracias escapes his lips. In this man you have a type of a very essential portion of the male population. Reader, it is no use your trying to imitate him; the whole scene, is peculiar to the Spaniard, in its every act, movement and expression. Old Hippo at the Zoological might as well try to rival the grace of a Taglioni.

Cubans usually eat dinner around 3:30 PM; after dinner, some go to the Paseo in their Volantes, others relax by the quay or gather around the military band in front of the Governor-General's palace. Look at that man with dark skin, dark hair, and bright eyes—he's sitting on a
stone bench listening to the music; a preserved bladder full of tobacco is open in front of him, and a small piece of thin paper is in his hand; quick as a flash, he rolls a cigarette and puts the tobacco back in his pocket. Now he stands up and walks toward a gentleman who is smoking; when he gets close, he raises his right hand, holding the cigarette almost at chin level, then gracefully throws his hand forward, saying simply Favor; after getting his light, he repeats the action, followed by a polite nod of his head as a faint Gracias slips from his lips. This man represents an important part of the male population. Reader, there's no point in trying to copy him; the entire scene is unique to the Spaniard, in every action, movement, and expression. Old Hippo at the Zoo might as well try to match the grace of a Taglioni.

The promenade over, many spend their evenings at billiards, dominoes, &c., adjourning from time to time to some café for the purpose of eating ices or sucking goodies, and where any trifling conversation or dispute is carried on with so much vivacity, both of tongue and of fingers, that the uninitiated become alarmed with apprehensions of some serious quarrel. Others again, who are ladies' men, or of domestic habits, either go home or meet at some friend's house, where they all sit in the front room on the ground-floor, with the windows wide open to the street, from which they are separated only by a few perpendicular iron bars. Yankee rocking-chairs and cane chairs are placed abreast of these windows, and facing each other like lines of sentinels; there they chat, smoke cigars, or suck their fingers, according to their sex and fancy. Occasionally a merry laugh is heard, but I cannot say it is very general. Sometimes they dance, which with them is a slow undulating movement, suited to a marble floor and a thermometer at eighty degrees. At a small village in the neighbourhood I saw a nigger hall,—the dance was precisely the same, being a mixture of country-dance and waltz; and I can assure you, Sambo and his ebony partner acquitted themselves admirably: they were all well dressed, looked very jolly and comfortable, and were by no means uproarious.

The stroll finished, many people spend their evenings playing pool, dominoes, etc., occasionally heading to a café to enjoy ice cream or snacks, where any light conversation or argument is so animated, both with words and gestures, that those unfamiliar with the scene might worry there’s a serious conflict. Others, who are more interested in women or prefer a quieter life, either go home or gather at a friend's place, where they all sit in the living room on the ground floor, with the windows wide open to the street, separated only by a few vertical iron bars. Rocking chairs and cane chairs are lined up by the windows, facing one another like rows of guards; there they chat, smoke cigars, or snack, depending on their gender and mood. Occasionally, you might hear a cheerful laugh, but it’s not very common. Sometimes they dance, which for them is a slow, flowing movement suited to a marble floor and a temperature around eighty degrees. At a small village nearby, I noticed a hall where black couples were dancing, and the style was just the same, a mix of country dancing and waltzing; I assure you, the dancers and their partners were well dressed, looked jolly and at ease, and were by no means loud.

You must not imagine, from my observations on the fair tenant of the Volante, that this is a land of beauty—far from it: one feature of beauty, and one only, is general—good eyes: with that exception, it is rare; but there are some few lovely daughters of Eve that would make the mouth of a marble statue water. Old age here is anything but attractive, either producing a mountainous obesity, or a skeleton on which the loose dried skin hangs in countless wrinkles. But such is generally the case in warm climates, as far as my observation goes. Any one wishing to verify these remarks, has only to go on the Paseo a little before sunset upon a Sunday evening, when he will be sure to meet nine-tenths of the population and the Volantes all in gayest attire. The weather on my arrival was very wet, and I was therefore unable to go into the country for some days; but having cleared up, I got my passport and took a trip into the interior.

You shouldn’t think that my comments about the beautiful tenant of the Volante mean this is a beautiful place—far from it. The only common feature of beauty here is generally good eyes; aside from that, it’s rare. However, there are a few stunning daughters of Eve who could make a marble statue seem envious. Old age is anything but attractive here, leading to either significant obesity or a gaunt frame with loose, wrinkled skin. But that’s usually the case in warm climates, from what I’ve observed. Anyone wanting to confirm these observations just needs to take a stroll on the Paseo a little before sunset on a Sunday evening, when they’ll likely see nine-tenths of the population and all the Volantes in their finest outfits. When I arrived, the weather was very rainy, so I couldn’t explore the countryside for a few days. However, once it cleared up, I got my passport and took a trip into the interior.

"EL CASERO," THE PARISH HAWKER IN CUBA.

"EL CASERO," THE PARISH HAWKER IN CUBA.

"EL CASERO," THE PARISH HAWKER IN CUBA.

"EL CASERO," THE PARISH HAWKER IN CUBA.

The railway cars are built on the American models, i.e., long cars, capable of containing about forty or fifty people; but they have had the good sense to establish first, second, and third-class carriages; and, at the end of each first-class carriage, there is a partition, shutting off eight seats, so that any party wishing to be private can easily be so. They travel at a very fair pace, but waste much time at the stopping-places, and whole hours at junctions. By one of these conveyances I went to Matanzas, which is very prettily situated in a lovely bay. There is a ridge, about three miles from the town, which is called the Cumbre, from the summit whereof you obtain a beautiful view of the valley of the Yumuri, so called from a river of that name, and concerning which there is a legend that it is famous for the slaughter of the Indians by the Spaniards; a legend which, too probably, rests on the foundation of truth, if we are to judge by the barbarities which dimmed the brilliancy of all their western conquests. The valley is now fruitful in sugar-canes, and surrounded with hills and woods; and the coup-d'oeil, when seen in the quick changing lights and shadows of the setting sun, is quite, enchanting. Continuing our ride, we crossed the valley as the moon was beginning to throw her dubious and silvery light upon the cane fields. A light breeze springing up, their flowery heads swayed to and fro like waving plumes, while their long leaves, striking one against the other, swept like a mournful sigh across the vale, as though Nature were offering its tribute of compassion to the fettered sons of Adam that had helped to give it birth.

The train cars are designed based on American models, meaning they are long and can hold about forty or fifty people. However, they've made a smart choice by creating first, second, and third-class carriages. At the end of each first-class carriage, there's a partition that separates eight seats, allowing any group wanting privacy to have it easily. They travel at a decent speed but spend a lot of time at stops and hours waiting at junctions. I took one of these trains to Matanzas, which is beautifully located in a lovely bay. There's a ridge about three miles from the town called the Cumbre, from where you get a stunning view of the Yumuri valley, named after the river that runs through it. There's a legend that it's known for the massacre of the Indians by the Spaniards; a legend likely based on truth, judging by the brutalities that marred their western conquests. The valley is now lush with sugarcane and surrounded by hills and forests, and the scenery, with the rapidly changing light and shadows of the setting sun, is truly enchanting. As we continued our journey, we crossed the valley just as the moon started to cast its soft silver light over the cane fields. A gentle breeze picked up, causing the flowery tops to sway back and forth like waving plumes, while the long leaves brushed against each other, creating a mournful sound across the valley, as if Nature was offering its sympathy to the enslaved sons of Adam who helped bring it to life.

There is a very important personage frequently met with in Cuba, who is called El Casero—in other words, the parish commissariat pedler. He travels on horseback, seated between two huge panniers, and goes round to all the cottages collecting what they wish to sell, and selling what they wish to buy, and every one who addresses him on business he styles, in reply, Caserita. This pedlering system may be very primitive, but it doubtless is a great convenience to the rural population, especially in an island which is so deficient in roads and communication. In short, I consider El Casero the representative of so useful and peculiar a class of the community, that I have honoured him with a wood-cut wherein he is seen bargaining with a negress for fowls, or vice versâ,—whichever the reader prefers,—for not being the artist, I cannot undertake to decide which idea he meant to convey.

There’s a very important figure often encountered in Cuba, known as El Casero—essentially, the local peddler for the parish. He rides on horseback, sitting between two large baskets, and goes around to all the cottages collecting things people want to sell and selling items they wish to buy. Anyone who talks to him about business he refers to as Caserita. This peddling system might be quite basic, but it’s definitely a huge convenience for the rural population, especially in an island where roads and communication are lacking. In short, I see El Casero as the representative of such a useful and unique class in the community, which is why I've honored him with a woodcut showing him haggling with a Black woman for chickens, or vice versa—whichever the reader prefers—since I’m not the artist, I can’t say which idea he intended to express.

There is nothing in the town of Matanzas worth seeing except the views of it and around it. The population amounts to about twenty-five thousand, and the shipping always helps to give it a gay appearance. My chief object in visiting these parts was to see something of the sugar plantations in the island; but as they resemble each other in essential features, I shall merely describe one of the best, which I visited when retracing my steps to Havana, and which belongs to one of the most wealthy men in the island. On driving up to it, you see a large airy house,—windows and doors all open, a tall chimney rearing its proud head in another building, and a kind of barrack-looking building round about. The hospitable owner appears to delight in having an opportunity of showing kindness to strangers. He speaks English fluently; but alas! the ladies do not; so we must look up our old rusty armoury of Spanish, and take the field with what courage we may. Kindness and good-will smooth all difficulties, and we feel astonished how well we get on; in short, if we stay here too long we shall get vain, and think we really can speak Spanish,—we must dine, we must stay, we must make the house our own, and truly I rejoiced that it was so. The house had every comfort, the society every charm, and the welcome was as warm as it was unostentatious. We—for you must know our party was four in number—most decidedly lit upon our legs, and the cuisine and the cellar lent effectual aid. The proprietor is an elderly man, and the son, who has travelled a good deal in Europe, manages the properties, which consist of several plantations, and employ about twelve hundred slaves. The sound of the lash is rarely heard, and the negroes are all healthy and happy-looking; several of them have means to purchase their liberty, but prefer their present lot. A doctor is kept on the estate for them; their houses are clean and decent; there is an airy hospital for them if sick, and there is a large nursery, with three old women who are appointed to take charge during the day of all children too young to work: at night they go to their respective families. On the whole property there was only one man under punishment, and he was placed to work in chains for having fired one of his master's buildings, which he was supposed to have been led to do, owing to his master refusing to allow him to take his infant home to his new wife till it was weaned; his former wife had died in child-bed, and he wished to rear it on arrowroot, &c. This the master—having found a good wet nurse for it—would not permit. The man had generally borne a very good character, and the master, whose entourage bears strong testimony to his kind rule, seized the opportunity of my visit to let him free at my request, as he had already been working four months in chains similar to those convicts sometimes wear; thus were three parties gratified by this act of grace.

There isn't much to see in the town of Matanzas, except for the views of the town and its surroundings. The population is around twenty-five thousand, and the shipping activity gives it a lively vibe. My main reason for visiting this area was to check out the sugar plantations on the island, but since they all have similar features, I’ll just describe one of the best, which I visited on my way back to Havana; it belongs to one of the wealthiest men on the island. Driving up to it, you see a large, airy house with all the windows and doors open, a tall chimney proudly standing on another building, and some barracks-like structures nearby. The friendly owner seems to enjoy welcoming strangers. He speaks English fluently, but unfortunately, the ladies don’t, so we have to dust off our old Spanish skills and make an effort to communicate. Kindness and good will make everything easier, and we are surprised at how well we manage; if we stay here too long, we might get cocky and think we can really speak Spanish—we must dine, we must stay, we must make ourselves at home, and I genuinely enjoyed that. The house had every comfort, the company was charming, and the welcome was warm yet unpretentious. We—just so you know, there were four of us—definitely were on our feet, and the food and drinks were excellent. The owner is an older gentleman, and his son, who has traveled a lot in Europe, manages the properties, which include several plantations and employ about twelve hundred enslaved people. The sound of the whip is rarely heard, and the enslaved individuals all look healthy and happy; some have the means to buy their freedom but prefer their current situation. A doctor is available on the estate for them; their housing is clean and decent; there’s a well-ventilated hospital for anyone who’s sick, and a large nursery with three elderly women who care for all the children too young to work during the day; at night, they go back to their families. Overall, there was only one man being punished, and he was working in chains for having burned one of his master’s buildings, which he reportedly did because his master wouldn’t let him take his infant home to his new wife until it was weaned; his previous wife had died during childbirth, and he wanted to raise the child on arrowroot, etc. The master—who had found a good wet nurse for the child—wouldn’t allow it. The man generally had a good reputation, and the master, whose entourage strongly reflects his kind rule, took the opportunity of my visit to set him free at my request, as he had already been working in chains like those sometimes worn by convicts for four months; this act of kindness brought satisfaction to all three parties involved.

It is well known that there are various ways of making sugar; but as the method adopted on this plantation contains all the newest improvements, I may as well give a short detail of the process as I witnessed it. The cane when brought from the field is placed between two heavy rollers, worked by steam, and the juice falls into a conductor below—the squashed cane being carried away to dry for fuel—whence it is raised by what is termed a "monte jus" into a tank above the "clarifier," which is a copper boiler, with iron jacket and steam between. A proper proportion of lime is introduced, sufficient to neutralize the acidity. When brought to the boiling-point the steam is shut off, and the liquid subsides. This operation is one of the most important in the whole process; from the clarifier it is run through an animal charcoal filterer, which, by its chemical properties, purifies it; from the filterer it runs into a tank, whence it is pumped up above the condensers, i.e., tubes, about fifteen in number, laid horizontally, one above the other, and containing the steam from the vacuum pans. The cold juice in falling over these hot tubes, condenses the steam-therein, and at the same time evaporates the water, which is always a considerable ingredient in the juice of the cane; the liquor then passes into a vacuum pan, which is fitted with a bull's-eye on one side, and a corresponding bull's-eye with a lamp on the opposite side, by which the process can be watched. Having boiled here sufficiently, it passes through a second filtration of animal charcoal, and then returns to a second vacuum pan, where it is boiled to the point of granulation; it is then run off into heaters below, whence it is ladled into moulds of an irregular conical shape, in which it is left to cool and to drain off any molasses that remain; when cooled it is taken to the purging-house. The house where the operations which we have been describing were going on, was two hundred yards long, forty yards broad, and built of solid cedar and mahogany.

It’s widely known that there are several ways to make sugar; however, since the method used on this plantation incorporates all the latest improvements, I’ll briefly describe the process as I saw it. The cane, when brought in from the field, is placed between two heavy steam-powered rollers, and the juice falls into a trough below—the crushed cane is taken away to dry for fuel. From there, it’s elevated by what’s called a "monte jus" into a tank above the "clarifier," which is a copper boiler with an iron jacket and steam in between. A proper amount of lime is added to neutralize the acidity. Once it reaches the boiling point, the steam is turned off, and the liquid settles. This step is one of the most critical in the entire process; from the clarifier, it passes through an animal charcoal filter, which purifies it through its chemical properties. After filtering, it flows into a tank, from which it’s pumped up to the condensers, i.e., about fifteen tubes arranged horizontally, one above another, containing steam from the vacuum pans. The cold juice, when cascading over these hot tubes, condenses the steam inside and simultaneously evaporates the water, which is a significant component of the cane juice. The liquid then moves into a vacuum pan, which has a bull's-eye on one side and a corresponding bull's-eye with a lamp on the opposite side, allowing observers to monitor the process. After boiling sufficiently here, it undergoes a second filtration with animal charcoal, then returns to a second vacuum pan where it’s boiled to the point of granulation. It’s then drained into heaters below, in which it’s ladled into irregular conical moulds, where it cools and drains off any remaining molasses; once cooled, it’s taken to the purging house. The building where these operations were taking place was two hundred yards long, forty yards wide, and constructed of solid cedar and mahogany.

In the purging-house, these moulds are all ranged with the point of the cone down, and gutters below. A layer of moist clay, about two inches deep, is then placed upon the sugar at the broad end of the cone, and, by the gradual percolation of its thick liquid, carries off the remaining impurities. When this operation is finished, the cones are brought out, and the sugar contained therein is divided into three parts, the apex of the cone being the least pure, the middle rather better, and the base the most pure and looking very white. This latter portion is then placed upon strong wooden troughs, about six or eight feet square. There, negroes and negresses break it up with long poles armed with hard-wood head, trampling it under their delicate pettitoes to such an extent as to give rise to the question whether sugar-tongs are not a useless invention. When well smashed and trodden, it is packed in boxes, and starts forth on its journeys; a very large proportion goes to Spain. The two least pure portions are sent to Europe, to be there refined. Such is a rough sketch of the sugar-making process, as I saw it. All the machinery was English, and the proprietor had a corps of English engineers, three in number, to superintend the work. In our roadless trips to various parts of the plantation, we found the advantage of the Volante, before described; and though three horses were harnessed, they had in many places enough to do. We stayed a couple of days with our kind and hospitable friends, and then returned to Havana.

In the purging house, all the molds are lined up with the point of the cone facing down and gutters below. A layer of damp clay, about two inches deep, is placed on the sugar at the wide end of the cone, and as its thick liquid gradually seeps through, it removes the remaining impurities. Once this process is complete, the cones are taken out, and the sugar inside is divided into three parts: the tip of the cone is the least pure, the middle is somewhat better, and the base is the purest and very white-looking. This last portion is then placed on strong wooden troughs, about six or eight feet square. There, men and women work to break it up with long poles topped with hard wood, trampling it under their delicate skirts to the point where one might wonder if sugar tongs are really necessary. After it's thoroughly smashed and trampled, it’s packed into boxes and sent on its way; a large portion goes to Spain. The two less pure parts are sent to Europe to be refined there. This is a basic overview of the sugar-making process as I observed it. All the equipment was English, and the owner had a team of three English engineers to oversee the operations. During our trips across the plantation without roads, we appreciated the benefits of the previously mentioned Volante; although three horses were harnessed, they often had a tough time in certain areas. We spent a couple of days with our kind and welcoming friends before returning to Havana.

No pen can convey the least idea of the wonderful luxuriance of vegetation which charms the eye at every step. There is a richness of colour and a fatness of substance in the foliage of every tree and shrub which I never met with before in any of my travels. The stately palm, with its smooth white stem glittering in the sunbeams like a column of burnished silver; the waving bamboo growing in little clumps, and nodding in the gentle breeze with all the graceful appearance of a gigantic ostrich plume; groves of the mango, with its deep and dark foliage defying the sun's rays; the guava, growing at its feet, like an infant of the same family; the mammee—or abricot de St. Domingue—with its rich green fruit hanging in clusters, and a foliage rivalling the mango; the dark and feathery tamarind; the light and graceful indigo; the slow-growing arrowroot, with its palmy and feathery leaves spreading like a tender rampart round its precious fruit; boundless fields of the rich sugar-cane; acres of the luscious pine apple; groves of banana and plantain; forests of cedar and mahogany; flowers of every hue and shade; the very jungle netted over with the creeping convolvulus,—these, and a thousand others, of which fortunately for the reader I know not the names, are continually bursting on the scene with equal profusion and variety, bearing lovely testimony to the richness of the soil and the mildness of the climate.

No pen can express even a hint of the incredible abundance of plant life that delights the eye at every turn. There’s a richness in color and a fullness in the leaves of every tree and shrub that I’ve never encountered before in all my travels. The tall palm, with its smooth white trunk shining in the sunlight like a polished silver column; the waving bamboo growing in small clusters, swaying in the gentle breeze like a giant ostrich plume; groves of mango trees, with their dense, dark leaves blocking the sun; the guava growing beneath them, like a younger sibling; the mammee—or abricot de St. Domingue—with its deep green fruit hanging in clusters and leaves that rival the mango’s; the dark, feathery tamarind; the light and elegant indigo; the slow-growing arrowroot, with its feathery leaves creating a delicate shield around its precious fruit; endless fields of rich sugarcane; acres of juicy pineapples; groves of bananas and plantains; forests of cedar and mahogany; flowers of every color and shade; and the very jungle covered with creeping convolvulus—these, along with countless others, whose names I sadly do not know, are consistently emerging with equal abundance and variety, beautifully showcasing the richness of the soil and the gentleness of the climate.

Alas! that this fair isle should be at one and the same time the richest gem in the crown of Spain, and the foulest blot on her escutcheon. Her treaties are violated with worse than Punic faith, and here horrors have been enacted which would make the blood of a Nero curdle in his veins. Do you ask, how are treaties violated? When slaves are brought here by our cruisers, Spain is bound by treaty to apprentice them out for three years, so as to teach them how to earn a living, and then to free them. My dear John Bull, you will be sorry to hear, that despite the activity of our squadron for the suppression of slavery, that faithless country which owes a national existence to oceans of British treasure, and the blood of the finest army the great Wellington ever led, has the unparalleled audacity to make us slave carriers to Cuba. Yes, thousands of those who, if honour and truth were to be found in the Government of Spain, would now be free, are here to be seen pining away their lives in the galling and accursed chains of slavery, a living reproach to England, and a black monument of Spanish faith. Yes, John Bull, I repeat the fact; thousands of negroes are bound here in hopeless fetters, that were brought here under the British flag. And, that there may be no doubt of the wilfulness with which the Cuban authorities disregard their solemn obligations, it is a notorious fact, that in a country where passports and police abound in every direction, so that a negro cannot move from his own home, upwards of a hundred were landed in the last year, 1852, from one vessel, at a place only thirty-five miles from the Havana, and marched in three days across the island to—where do you think?—to some Creole's, or to some needy official's estate? no such thing; but, as if to stamp infamy on Spain, at the highest step of the ladder, they were marched to the Queen Mother's estate. If this be not wickedness in high places, what is? The slave trade flourishes luxuriantly here with the connivance of authority; and what makes the matter worse is, that the wealth accumulated by this dishonesty and national perjury is but too generally—and I think too justly—believed to be the mainspring of that corruption at home for which Spain stands pre-eminent among the nations of the earth. I will now give you a sketch of the cruelties which have been enacted here; and, although an old story, I do not think it is very generally known.

Alas! That this beautiful island should be both the richest jewel in Spain’s crown and the darkest stain on her reputation. Treaties are broken with worse than treacherous deceit, and here, horrors have occurred that would make the blood of a Nero freeze. Do you wonder how treaties are violated? When our ships bring slaves here, Spain is obligated by treaty to train them for three years to help them learn to earn a living, and then to set them free. My dear John Bull, you're going to be upset to hear that despite our squadron's efforts to end slavery, that disloyal nation, which owes its very existence to British wealth and the sacrifices of one of the best armies ever led by the great Wellington, has the incredible nerve to make us slave traders to Cuba. Yes, thousands of those who, if honor and truth existed in the Spanish Government, would now be free, are seen here wasting away under the cruel chains of slavery, a living shame for England and a grim testament to Spanish betrayal. Yes, John Bull, I say it again; thousands of black people are trapped here in hopeless chains, having been brought under the British flag. To remove any doubt about the Cuban authorities' blatant disregard for their promises, it’s well known that in a country where passports and police are everywhere, making it impossible for a black person to leave their own home, over a hundred were disembarked last year, 1852, from one ship, only thirty-five miles from Havana, and marched across the island in three days to—what do you think?—to some Creole's estate, or to some needy official's land? Not at all; in a move that throws shame on Spain, they were taken straight to the estate of the Queen Mother. If this isn't wickedness in high places, then what is? The slave trade thrives here with the help of those in power; and to make matters worse, the wealth gained from this dishonorable act and national betrayal is widely—and, I believe justly—thought to be the main cause of the corruption that makes Spain stand out among nations around the world. Now, I’ll give you an overview of the cruelties happening here; and although it’s an old story, I don’t think it’s widely known.

When General O'Donnell obtained the captain-generalship of Cuba, whether his object was to obtain honours from Spain for quelling an insurrection, or whether he was deceived, I cannot decide; but an imaginary insurrection was got up, and a military court was sent in every direction throughout the island. These courts were to obtain all information as to the insurrection, and, of course, to flog the negroes till they confessed. Unfledged ensigns would come with their guard upon a plantation, and despite the owner's assurance that there was no feeling of insubordination among the negroes, they would set to work flogging right and left, till in agony the poor negro would say something which would be used to criminate some other, who in turn would be flogged till in agony he made some assertion; and so it went on, till the blood-thirsty young officer was satiated. On one plantation a negro lad had been always brought up with one of the sons of the proprietor, and was, in fact, quite a pet in the family. One of these military courts visited the plantation, and insisted upon flogging this pet slave till he confessed what he never knew. In vain his master strove to convince the officer of his perfect innocence; he would not listen, and the poor lad was tied up, and received seven hundred lashes, during which punishment some remarks he made in the writhings of his agony were noted down, and he was shot at Matanzas for the same. The master's son, who was forced to witness this barbarity inflicted upon the constant companion of his early youth, never recovered the shock, and died the following year insane.

When General O'Donnell became the captain-general of Cuba, I can't say whether he aimed to earn honors from Spain for crushing a rebellion or if he was simply misled; however, a fake uprising was staged, and military courts were dispatched throughout the island. These courts were tasked with gathering information about the supposed insurrection and, naturally, they resorted to beating the enslaved people until they confessed. Inexperienced young officers would arrive with their guards at a plantation, and despite the owner insisting there was no rebellious sentiment among the enslaved, they would start whipping indiscriminately. Poor individuals would be tortured until they said something that could implicate someone else, who would then be tortured in turn, and this cycle continued until the bloodthirsty young officer was satisfied. On one plantation, a young enslaved boy had grown up alongside one of the owner's sons and was essentially a beloved member of the family. One of these military courts came to the plantation and demanded to whip this cherished slave until he confessed to something he didn’t know. The owner tried in vain to convince the officer of the boy's absolute innocence, but he refused to listen, and the poor boy was tied up and received seven hundred lashes. During the punishment, some comments he made in his agony were recorded, and he was executed in Matanzas for those statements. The master's son, who was forced to witness this cruelty inflicted on his childhood friend, never recovered from the trauma and died insane the following year.

The streets of Matanzas were in some places running with negro blood. An eye-witness told me that near the village of Guinés he saw a negro flogged with an aloe-leaf till both hip-bones were perfectly bare; and there is little doubt that 1500 slaves died under the lash. You will perhaps be surprised, most excellent John Bull, when I tell you that the cruelties did not stop at the negroes, but extended even to whites who claimed British protection. One of them was chained to a log of wood in the open air for a hundred days and a hundred nights, despite the strongest remonstrances on the part of the British authorities, and was eventually unchained, to die two days after in jail. Several others were imprisoned and cruelly treated; and when this reign of terror, worthy even of Spain in her bloodiest days, was over, and their case was inquired into, they were perfectly exonerated, and a compensation was awarded them. This was in 1844. Some of them have since died from the treatment they then received; and, if I am correctly informed, Spain—by way of keeping up her character—has not paid to those who survive one farthing of the sum awarded. Volumes might be filled with the atrocities of 1844; but the foregoing is enough of the sickening subject. When I call to mind the many amiable and high-minded Spaniards I have met, the national conduct of Spain becomes indeed a mystery. But to return to present times.

The streets of Matanzas were, in some places, covered in black blood. An eye-witness told me that near the village of Guinés, he saw a Black man whipped with an aloe leaf until both hip bones were completely bare; and there is little doubt that 1,500 slaves died from the beatings. You might be surprised, dear John Bull, when I tell you that the cruelty didn’t stop with the Black population, but also affected whites who sought British protection. One of them was chained to a log of wood in the open for a hundred days and nights, despite strong protests from British authorities, and was eventually freed, only to die two days later in jail. Several others were imprisoned and treated harshly; and when this reign of terror, even worse than Spain’s bloodiest days, was over, and their cases were examined, they were fully cleared, and compensation was awarded to them. This was in 1844. Some of them have since died from the treatment they received back then; and, if I’ve been informed correctly, Spain—trying to maintain its reputation—has not paid a single penny to those who survived the ordeal. Books could be written about the atrocities of 1844; but what I’ve shared is enough of this disturbing topic. When I think back to the many kind and principled Spaniards I’ve met, the national behavior of Spain truly becomes a mystery. But let's return to the present.

H.M.S. "Vestal," commanded by that active young officer, Captain C.B. Hamilton, was stationed at Cuba for the suppression of slavery, &c. She had been watching some suspicious vessels in the harbour for a long time; but as they showed no symptoms of moving, she unbent sails and commenced painting, &c. A day or two after, as daylight broke, the suspicious vessels were missing from the harbour. The "Vestal" immediately slipped, and, getting the ferry-boat to tow her outside, commenced a chase, and the next day succeeded in capturing four vessels. Of course they were brought into Havana, to be tried at the Mixed Court there; three, I believe, were condemned, but the fourth, called the "Emilia Arrogante" is the one to which I wish to call your attention, because she, though the most palpably guilty, belonged to wealthy people in the island, and therefore, of course, was comparatively safe. When taken, the slave-deck which she had on board was carefully put into its place, and every plank and beam exactly fitted, as was witnessed and testified to by several of the "Vestal's" officers; yet, will you believe it, when given up to the local authorities, they either burnt or made away with this only but all-sufficient evidence, so that it became impossible for the Court to condemn her.

H.M.S. "Vestal," commanded by the active young officer, Captain C.B. Hamilton, was stationed in Cuba to combat slavery and other issues. She had been monitoring some suspicious vessels in the harbor for quite a while; however, since they showed no signs of movement, she relaxed the sails and started painting, among other things. A day or two later, when daylight broke, the suspicious vessels were gone from the harbor. The "Vestal" quickly set sail, getting a ferry boat to tow her out, and began the chase, eventually capturing four vessels the next day. Naturally, they were brought to Havana to be tried at the Mixed Court; I believe three were condemned, but the fourth, named the "Emilia Arrogante," is the one I want to focus on because, despite being clearly guilty, it belonged to wealthy people on the island and was therefore relatively safe. When captured, the slave deck on board was carefully assembled, with every plank and beam fitting perfectly, as confirmed by several officers from the "Vestal." Yet, can you believe it? When handed over to the local authorities, they either burned or disposed of this key piece of evidence, making it impossible for the Court to condemn her.

It is curious to hear the open way people speak of the bribery of the officials in the island, and the consequent endless smuggling that goes on. A captain of a merchant-vessel told me that in certain articles, which, for obvious reasons, I omit to mention, it is impossible to trade except by smuggling; so universal is the practice, that he would be undersold fifty per cent. He mentioned an instance, when the proper duties amounted to 1200l., the broker went to the official and obtained a false entry by which he only paid 400l. duty, and this favour cost him an additional 400l. bribe to the official, thus saving 400l. This he assured me, after being several years trading to Cuba, was the necessary practice of the small traders; nobody in Cuba is so high that a bribe does not reach him, from the Captain-General, who is handsomely paid for breaking his country's plighted faith in permitting the landing of negroes, down to the smallest unpaid official. With two-thirds the excuse is, "We are so ill-paid, we must take bribes;" with the other third the excuse is, "It is the custom of the island." Spain could formerly boast pre-eminence in barbarity—she has now attained to pre-eminence in official corruption; but the day must come, though it may yet be distant, when her noble sons of toil will burst the fetters of ignorance in which they are bound, and rescue their fair land from the paltry nothingness of position which it occupies among the nations of Europe, despite many generous and noble hearts which even now, in her degradation, are to be found blushing over present realities and striving to live on past recollections.

It's interesting to hear how openly people talk about the bribery of officials on the island and the endless smuggling that happens as a result. A captain of a merchant ship told me that for certain items, which I won’t name for obvious reasons, it’s only possible to trade through smuggling; the practice is so widespread that he would be undercut by fifty percent. He shared an example where the proper duties were 1200l, but the broker approached the official and got a false entry, allowing him to pay only 400l in duties. This favor cost him an additional 400l as a bribe to the official, saving him a total of 400l. After several years of trading in Cuba, he assured me this was standard practice for small traders; no one in Cuba is too important to be reached by a bribe, from the Captain-General, who is well compensated for violating his country's promises by allowing the arrival of slaves, to the lowest unpaid official. For two-thirds of them, the excuse is, "We are poorly paid, so we have to take bribes;" for the other third, it's, "It’s just the custom here." Spain used to take pride in its brutal practices—but now it leads in official corruption. However, the day will come, even if it’s still far off, when her hardworking people will break free from the chains of ignorance that hold them back and elevate their beautiful country from its insignificant position among the nations of Europe, despite the many generous and noble souls who, even now, in its decline, are embarrassed by the current situation and trying to live off past glories.

There were some British men-of-war lying in the harbour; and as my two German friends were anxious to see the great-gun exercise, I went on board with these gentlemen to witness the drill, with which they were much pleased. After it was over, and the ship's company had gone to dinner, they wished to smoke a cigar, the whiffs of Jack's pipe having reached their olfactories. Great was their astonishment, and infinite my disgust, when we were walked forward to the galley to enjoy our weed, to find the crew smoking on the opposite side. It is astonishing to think that, with so much to be improved and attended to in the Navy, the authorities in Whitehall-place should fiddle-faddle away precious time in framing regulations about smoking, for the officers; and, instead of leaving the place to be fixed by the captain of each vessel, and holding him responsible, should name a place which, it is not too much to say, scarce one captain in ten thinks of confining his officers to, for the obvious reason that discipline is better preserved by keeping the officers and men apart during such occupations,—and, moreover, that sending officers to the kitchen to smoke is unnecessarily offensive. These same orders existed thirty years ago; and, as it was well known they were never attended to, except by some anti-smoking captain, who used them as an excuse, the Admiralty very wisely rescinded an order which, by being all but universally disregarded, tended to weaken the weight and authority of all other orders; and after the word "galley," they then added, "or such other place as the captain shall appoint." After some years, however, so little was there of greater importance to engage their attention in naval affairs, that this sensible order was rescinded, and the original one renewed in full force, and, of course, with similar bad effect, as only those captains who detest smoking—an invisible minority—or those who look for promotion from scrupulous obedience to insignificant details—an equally invisible minority—act up to the said instructions. Nevertheless, so important an element in naval warfare is smoking now considered, that in the printed form supplied to admirals for the inspection of vessels under their command, as to "State and Preparation for Battle," one of the first questions is, "Are the orders relative to smoking attended to?" If I am not much misinformed, when Admiral Collier was appointed to the Channel squadron, he repaired to the Admiralty, and told the First Lord that he had smoked in his own cabin for twenty years, and that he could not forego that pleasure. The First Lord is said to have laughed, and made the sensible remark, "Of course you'll do as you like;" thereby showing, in my opinion, his just sense of the ridiculousness of such a childish regulation. So much for folly redivivus.

There were some British warships docked in the harbor, and since my two German friends were eager to see the big gun drill, I joined them onboard to watch the exercise, which they really enjoyed. After it finished and the crew went to have dinner, they wanted to smoke a cigar, having caught a whiff of Jack's pipe. They were shocked, and I was equally disgusted, when we walked to the galley to enjoy our smoke and saw the crew on the other side. It's amazing to think that, with so much needing improvement in the Navy, the authorities at Whitehall would waste time making rules about smoking for the officers. Instead of leaving it to the captain of each ship to decide and holding him accountable, they specified a place which, honestly, hardly any captain thinks to confine his officers to, because keeping officers and men apart during such activities is clearly better for discipline—and sending officers to the kitchen to smoke is just plain rude. These same rules existed thirty years ago; and since it was well known that they were only followed by some anti-smoking captain who used them as an excuse, the Admiralty smartly revoked an order that was almost universally ignored, which weakened the importance of all other orders. They added "or such other place as the captain shall appoint" after "galley." However, after a few years, there was so little of greater importance to focus on in naval matters that this sensible order was revoked, and the original one was reinstated in full force, resulting in the same negative effects, as only those captains who hate smoking—a tiny minority—or those who seek promotion through strict adherence to trivial details—another equally small minority—actually follow those instructions. Nonetheless, smoking is now considered such an important aspect of naval warfare that one of the first questions on the printed form given to admirals for inspecting their ships about "State and Preparation for Battle" is, "Are the smoking orders being followed?" If I'm not mistaken, when Admiral Collier was appointed to the Channel squadron, he went to the Admiralty and told the First Lord that he had smoked in his own cabin for twenty years and couldn’t give that up. The First Lord reportedly laughed and made the sensible comment, "Of course you'll do as you like," showing, in my opinion, a good understanding of how ridiculous such a childish rule is. So much for foolishness redivivus.

While on the subject of smoking, I may as well say a few words upon cigar manufacture. In the first place, all the best tobacco grows at the lower end of the island, and is therefore called "Vuelta abajo." An idea has found its way into England, that it is impossible to make cigars at home as well as at the Havana; and the reason given is, the tobacco is made up at Havana during its first damping, and that, having to be re-damped in England, it loses thereby its rich flavour and aroma. Now, this is a most egregious mistake; for in some of the best houses here you will find tobacco two and even four years old, which is not yet worked up into cigars, and which, consequently, has to be re-damped for that purpose. If this be so, perhaps you will ask how is it that British-made cigars are never so good as those from Havana? There are two very good reasons for this—the one certain, the other probable. The probable one is, that the best makers in Havana, whose brand is their fortune—such as Cabaños y Carvajal—will be jealous of sending the best tobacco out of the country, lest, being forced to use inferior tobacco, they might lose their good name; and the other reason is, that cigars improve in flavour considerably by a sea voyage. So fully is this fact recognised here, that many merchants pay the duty of three shillings a thousand to embark their cigars in some of the West India steamers, and then have them carried about for a month or so, thereby involving a further payment for freight; and they all express themselves as amply repaid by the improvement thereby effected in their cigars. Nevertheless, many old Cubans prefer smoking cigars the same week that they are made. At the same time, if any honest tobacconist in England chose to hoist the standard of "small profit and plenty of it," he might make very good Havana tobacco cigars, at 50 per cent. profit, under 16s. per 100. Thus—duty, 3s. 6d; tobacco, 5s.; freight and dues, &c., 6d.; making up, 1s. 6d.—absolute cost of cigars, 10s. 6d. per 100; 50 per cent. profit thereon, 5s. 3d.; total, 15s. 9d. For this sum a better article could be supplied than is ordinarily obtained at prices varying from 25s. to 30s.

While we're talking about smoking, I might as well mention a bit about cigar making. First of all, the best tobacco comes from the lower part of the island, and that's why it's called "Vuelta abajo." There’s a belief in England that it's impossible to make cigars at home as well as in Havana, and the reason given is that the tobacco is processed in Havana during its first moisten and that when it’s re-moistened in England, it loses its rich flavor and aroma. This is a huge misconception; in some of the best shops here, you'll find tobacco that is two to even four years old and it’s not yet rolled into cigars, meaning it will need to be re-moistened for that purpose. So, you might ask, why are British-made cigars never as good as those from Havana? There are two solid reasons for this—one is definite, the other is likely. The likely reason is that the best makers in Havana, whose brand is their livelihood—like Cabaños y Carvajal—are reluctant to export the best tobacco out of the country, fearing that if they have to use lower quality tobacco, it could hurt their reputation; the other reason is that cigars actually taste better after a sea voyage. This fact is so widely accepted here that many merchants pay a duty of three shillings for every thousand cigars to ship them on some West India steamers, and then keep them on board for about a month, incurring extra freight costs as well, and they all say they see great improvement in their cigars because of this. However, many seasoned Cubans prefer to smoke cigars within the same week they are made. At the same time, if any honest tobacconist in England decided to adopt the motto of "small profit and plenty of it," he could produce really good Havana tobacco cigars at a 50% profit for under 16s. per 100. So, breaking it down—duty, 3s. 6d; tobacco, 5s. freight and fees, etc., 6d; making them up, 1s. 6d.—the total cost of the cigars comes to 10s. 6d. per 100; with a 50% profit of 5s. 3d; totaling 15s. 9d. For that price, a better quality cigar could be offered than what is usually available at prices ranging from 25s. to 30s.

But 50 per cent. profit will not satisfy the British tobacconist when he finds John Bull willing to give him 100 per cent. He therefore makes the cigars at the prices above-mentioned, puts them into old boxes with some pet brand upon them, and sells them as the genuine article. John Bull is indebted for this extortionate charge to the supreme wisdom of the Legislature, which has established a 3s. 6d. duty on the pound of unmanufactured tobacco, and a 9s. duty on manufactured; instead of fixing one duty for manufactured and unmanufactured, and making the difference thereof depend upon the quality—lowering the duty upon the tobacco used by the poor to 2s. 6d., and establishing on all the better kinds a uniform rate, say 6s. or 7s. The revenue, I believe, would gain, and the public have a better protection against the fraud of which they are now all but universal victims. But to return to Havana.

But a 50 percent profit won't satisfy British tobacconists when they see John Bull ready to pay 100 percent. So, they make the cigars at the prices mentioned above, pack them in old boxes with some familiar brand on them, and sell them as the real deal. John Bull ends up paying this outrageous price because of the brilliant decisions made by the Legislature, which has set a 3s. 6d tax on a pound of unprocessed tobacco and a 9s tax on processed tobacco. Instead of having a single tax for processed and unprocessed tobacco, with the difference based on quality—lowering the tax on tobacco used by the less fortunate to 2s. 6d and implementing a standard rate of 6s or 7s on the higher-quality types—the government could actually increase revenue and give the public better protection against the widespread fraud they're currently facing. But back to Havana.

The price paid for making cigars varies from 8s. to 80s. a thousand, the average being about 15s. A certain quality of tobacco is made up into cigars, and from time to time they are handed over to the examiner, who divides them into three separate classes, the difference being merely in the make thereof. A second division then takes place, regulated by the colour of the outside wrapper, making the distinction of "light" or "brown." Now, the three classes first noticed, you will observe, are precisely the same tobacco; but knowing how the public are gulled by the appearance, the prices are very different. Thus, taking the brand of Cabaños y Carvajal Prensados, his first, or prettiest, are 6l. 8s. per 1000; his second are 5l. 12s.; and his third are 5l.; and yet no real difference of quality exists. The cigars of which I speak are of the very best quality, and the dearest brand in Havana. Now, let us see what they cost put into the tobacconist's shop in London:—32 dollars is 180s.; duty, 90s.; export at Havana, 3s.; freight and extra expenses, say 7s.—making 230s. a thousand, or 23s. a hundred, for the dearest and best Havana cigars, London size. But three-fourths of the cigars which leave the Havana for England do not cost more than 3l. 4s. per thousand, which would bring their cost price to the tobacconist down to 16s. 5d. The public know what they pay, and can make their own reflections.

The price for making cigars ranges from 8s. to 80s. per thousand, with an average of about 15s. A specific quality of tobacco is crafted into cigars, which are periodically handed over to the examiner, who sorts them into three distinct classes based on their construction. A second classification occurs based on the color of the outer wrapper, distinguishing them as "light" or "brown." You’ll notice that the three classes mentioned are made from the exact same tobacco; however, the public is often misled by their appearance, leading to significantly different prices. For example, the brand Cabaños y Carvajal Prensados charges 6l. 8s. for the first or most attractive class, 5l. 12s. for the second, and 5l. for the third class, despite no actual difference in quality. The cigars I'm referring to are of the highest quality and the most expensive brand in Havana. Now, let’s look at their prices in a tobacconist’s shop in London:—32 dollars equals 180s. for duties, 90s. for customs, 3s. for export from Havana, and approximately 7s. for freight and additional costs—totaling 230s. per thousand, or 23s. per hundred, for the best Havana cigars, London size. However, three-fourths of the cigars shipped from Havana to England cost no more than 3l. 4s. per thousand, bringing their cost to the tobacconist down to 16s. 5d. The public is aware of what they pay and can draw their own conclusions.

There is another class of cigar known in England as "Plantations," here called "Vegueros." They are of the richest tobacco, and are all made in the country by the sable ladies of the island, who use no tables to work at, if report speaks truth; and as both hands are indispensable in the process of rolling, what they roll upon must be left to the imagination. It will not do to be too fastidious in this world. Cooks finger the dainty cutlets, and keep dipping their fingers into the rich sauces, and sucking them, to ascertain their progress, and yet the feasters relish the savoury dish not one whit the less; so smokers relish the Veguero, though on what rolled modesty forbids me to mention,—nor do they hesitate to press between their lips the rich "Regalia," though its beautifully-finished point has been perfected by an indefinite number of passages of the negro's forefinger from the fragrant weed to his own rosy tongue. Men must not be too nice; but I think in the above description a fair objection is to be found to ladies smoking.

There’s another type of cigar known in England as "Plantations," but here they're called "Vegueros." They’re made from the finest tobacco and are all produced locally by the black women of the island, who reportedly don’t use tables to work on. Since both hands are essential to the rolling process, you can only imagine what they roll on. We shouldn’t be too picky in this world. Cooks touch the delicate cutlets, dipping their fingers into rich sauces and tasting them to check on their progress, yet diners enjoy the flavorful dish just the same; likewise, smokers enjoy the Veguero, even if I can't mention what it’s rolled on—nor do they hesitate to savor the rich "Regalia," despite its elegantly finished tip being perfected by countless transfers from the fragrant tobacco to the person's own tongue. Men shouldn’t be too fussy, but I do think there’s a reasonable argument against ladies smoking based on the description above.

With regard to the population of Cuba, the authorities, of course, wish to give currency to the idea that the whites are the most numerous. Having asked one of these officials who had the best means of knowing, he told me there were 550,000 whites and 450,000 negroes; but prosecuting my inquiries in a far more reliable quarter, I found there were 600,000 slaves, 200,000 free, and only 500,000 whites,—thus making the coloured population as eight to five. The military force in the island consists of 20,000, of which 18,000 are infantry, 1000 cavalry, and 1000 artillery[Z]. The demand for labour in the island is so great, that a speculation has been entered into by a mercantile house here to bring 6000 Chinese. The speculator has already disposed of them at 24l. a-head; they are to serve for five years, and receive four shillings a day, and they find their own way back. The cost of bringing them is calculated at 10l. a head,—thus leaving 14l. gain on each, which, multiplied by 6000, gives 84,000l. profit to the speculator,—barring, of course, losses from deaths and casualties on the journey. Chinese have already been tried here, and they prove admirably suited to all the mechanical labour, but far inferior to the negroes in the fields.

Regarding the population of Cuba, the authorities want to promote the idea that whites are the majority. When I asked one official who should know better, he told me there were 550,000 whites and 450,000 Black people. However, after asking around in a more trustworthy source, I discovered there are actually 600,000 slaves, 200,000 free Black people, and only 500,000 whites, making the ratio of the colored population eight to five. The military force on the island has 20,000 members, including 18,000 infantry, 1,000 cavalry, and 1,000 artillery[Z]. The demand for labor on the island is so high that a business here has decided to bring in 6,000 Chinese workers. The speculator has already sold them at £24 each; they will work for five years and earn four shillings a day, while finding their own way back home. The cost to bring them is estimated at £10 each, leaving a profit of £14 on each, which, multiplied by 6,000, results in a profit of £84,000 for the speculator, not counting any losses from deaths or other issues during the journey. Chinese workers have already been tried here, and they are very well-suited for mechanical labor, but they are not as effective as Black workers in the fields.

I find that people in the Havana can he humbugged as well as John Bull. A Chinese botanist came here, and bethought him of trying his skill as a doctor. Everybody became mad to consult him; no street was ever so crowded as the one he lived in, since Berners-street on the day of the hoax. He got a barrel of flour, or some other innocuous powder, packed up in little paper parcels, and thus armed he received his patients. On entering, he felt the pulse with becoming silence and gravity; at last he said, "Great fire." He then put his hand on the ganglionic centre, from which he radiated to the circumjacent parts, and then, frowning deep thought, he observed, "Belly great swell; much wind; pain all round." His examination being thus accomplished, he handed the patient a paper of the innocuous powder, pocketed sixteen shillings, and dismissed him. This scene, without any variety in observation, examination, prescription, or fee, was going on for two months, at the expiration of which time he re-embarked for China with 8000l.

I’ve noticed that people in Havana can be fooled just as easily as John Bull. A Chinese botanist arrived here and decided to try his hand at being a doctor. Everyone rushed to consult him; no street was ever as packed as his, reminiscent of Berners Street on the day of the hoax. He brought a barrel of flour or some harmless powder, packaged it into small paper parcels, and with that, he was ready to see his patients. Upon entering, he took the pulse with the appropriate seriousness and poise; finally, he declared, "Great fire." He then placed his hand on the ganglionic center, radiating his focus to the nearby areas, and with a deep frown of concentration, he noted, "Belly great swell; much wind; pain all round." After finishing his examination, he gave the patient a packet of the harmless powder, pocketed sixteen shillings, and sent them on their way. This routine, with no variation in observation, examination, prescription, or fee, continued for two months, after which he boarded a ship back to China with 8000 l.

As I believe that comparatively little is known in England of the laws existing in Cuba with respect to domicile, police, slavery, &c., I shall devote a few pages to the subject, which, in some of its details, is amusing enough. No person is allowed to land on the island without a passport from the place whence he arrives, and a fiador, or surety, in the island, who undertakes to supply the authorities with information of the place of his residence for one year; nor can he remain in the island more than three months without a "domiciliary ticket." People of colour arriving in any vessel are to be sent to a government deposit; if the master prefers to keep them on board he may, but in that case he is liable to a fine of 200l. if any of them land on the island; after a certain hour in the evening all gatherings in the street are put a stop to, and everybody is required to carry a lantern about with him; the hierarchy and "swells"—personas de distincion—being alone exempt. All purchases made from slaves or children or doubtful parties are at the risk of the purchaser, who is liable not merely to repay the price given, but is further subject to a heavy fine: no bad law either. Any boy between the ages of ten and sixteen who may be found in the streets as a vagrant may be taken before the president of the Seccion de Industria de la Real Sociedad Economica, by whom he is articled out to a master of the trade he wishes to learn. No place of education can be opened without the teacher thereof has been duly licensed. No game of chance is allowed in any shop or tavern, except in billiard-saloons and coffee-houses, where draughts and dominoes, chess and backgammon are tolerated. After a certain fixed hour of the night, no person is allowed to drive about in a Volante with the head up, unless it rains or the sitter be an invalid; the penalty is fifteen shillings. No private individual is allowed to give a ball or a concert without permission of the authorities. Fancy Londonderry House going to the London police-office to get permission for a quadrille or a concert. How pleasant! The specific gravity of milk is accurately calculated, and but a moderate margin allowed for pump mixture; should that margin be exceeded, or any adulteration discovered, the whole is forfeited to some charitable institution. If such a salutary law existed in London, pigs' brains would fall in the market, and I should not see so many milk-pails at the spring during my early morning walks to the Serpentine.

As I think not much is known in England about the laws in Cuba regarding residence, law enforcement, slavery, etc., I’m going to spend a few pages on this topic, which is quite entertaining in some aspects. No one is allowed to disembark on the island without a passport from their point of origin and a fiador, or guarantor, on the island, who agrees to inform the authorities of their place of residence for a year; additionally, they cannot stay on the island for more than three months without a "domiciliary ticket." People of color arriving in any ship are to be sent to a government holding area; if the captain wants to keep them on board, he can, but he risks a fine of 200l if any of them set foot on the island. After a certain hour in the evening, all gatherings in the street are prohibited, and everyone must carry a lantern; only the hierarchy and the "swells" — personas de distincion — are exempt from this rule. Any purchases made from slaves, children, or questionable parties are at the buyer's risk, who may have to repay the given price and face a hefty fine: not a bad law, either. Any boy between the ages of ten and sixteen found wandering the streets can be taken before the president of the Seccion de Industria de la Real Sociedad Economica, who will then assign him to a master in the trade he wants to learn. No school can open without the teacher being officially licensed. No gambling is allowed in any store or tavern, except in billiard halls and coffee houses, where checkers, dominoes, chess, and backgammon are permitted. After a certain time at night, no one is allowed to ride in a Volante with the top down, unless it’s raining or the passenger is an invalid; the fine for this is fifteen shillings. No private individual can host a ball or concert without the authorities' permission. Imagine Londonderry House going to the London police to get permission for a dance or concert. How enjoyable! The specific gravity of milk is precisely measured, and only a small margin is allowed for added water; if this margin is exceeded or any adulteration is found, the entire batch is confiscated for charity. If such a useful law existed in London, the price of pig brains would drop, and I wouldn’t see so many milk buckets at the spring during my early morning walks to the Serpentine.

Among the regulations for health, the following are to be found. No private hospital or infirmary is to be opened without a government licence. All keepers of hotels, coffee or eating houses, &c., are bound to keep their kitchen "battery" well tinned inside, under a heavy penalty of 3l. 10s. for every utensil which may be found insufficiently tinned, besides any further liabilities to which they may be subject for accidents arising from neglect thereof. Every shop is obliged to keep a vessel with water at the threshold of the outer door, to assist in avoiding hydrophobia. All houses that threaten to tumble down must be rebuilt, and if the owner is unable to bear the expense, he must sell the house to some one who can bear it. Another clause, after pointing out the proper places for bathing, enjoins a pair of bathing breeches, under a penalty of fifteen shillings for each offence; the particular cut is not specified. Let those who object to put convex fig-leaves over the little cherubs, and other similar works of art at the Crystal Palace, take a lesson from the foregoing, and clothe them all in Cuba pants as soon as possible; scenes are generally more interesting when the imagination is partially called into play. Boys, both little and big, are kept in order by a fine of fifteen shillings for every stone they throw, besides paying in full for all damage caused thereby. No one is allowed to carry a stick more than one inch in diameter under a penalty of twelve shillings; but all white people are allowed to carry swords, provided they are carried openly and in their scabbards.

Among the health regulations, the following rules are listed. No private hospital or infirmary can open without a government license. All owners of hotels, cafes, or restaurants must ensure their kitchen equipment is properly tinned inside, with a hefty fine of 3l 10s for each utensil that is found to be inadequately tinned, plus any other liabilities they may face for accidents due to negligence. Every shop must have a vessel with water at the entrance to help prevent hydrophobia. Any houses that are at risk of collapsing must be rebuilt, and if the owner can't cover the costs, they must sell the house to someone who can. Another rule, after specifying suitable bathing locations, requires wearing bathing shorts, with a fine of fifteen shillings for each violation; the specific style is not mentioned. Those who want to cover the little cherubs and other decorative art at the Crystal Palace should take a hint from this and dress them in Cuba pants as soon as possible; scenes are generally more engaging when the imagination is somewhat stimulated. Boys, both young and old, will be fined fifteen shillings for every stone they throw, in addition to being responsible for any resulting damage. No one is permitted to carry a stick thicker than one inch in diameter, under a penalty of twelve shillings; however, all white individuals are allowed to carry swords, as long as they are displayed openly in their scabbards.

The foregoing are sufficient to convey to the reader some idea of the ban of pains and penalties under which a resident is placed; at the same time it may be as well to inform him, that, except those enactments which bear upon espionage, they are about as much attended to as the laws with regard to the introduction of slaves, respecting which latter I will now give you a few of the regulations.

The above points are enough to give the reader an idea of the strict rules and punishments that a resident faces; however, it’s worth mentioning that, aside from the laws concerning spying, these rules are largely ignored, similar to how the laws about the introduction of slaves are treated. Now, I will provide a few of those regulations.

Slave owners are bound to give their slaves three meals a-day, and the substance thereof must be eleven ounces of meat or salt-fish, four ounces of bread, and farinaceous vegetables equal to six plantains; besides this, they are bound to give them two suits of clothes—all specified—yearly. Alas! how appropriate is the slang phrase "Don't you wish you may get 'em?" So beautifully motherly is Spain regarding her slaves, that the very substance of infants' clothes under three years of age is prescribed; another substance from three to six; then comes an injunction that from six to fourteen the girls are to be shirted and the boys breeched. I am sure this super-parental solicitude upon the part of the Government must be admitted to be most touching. By another regulation, the working time is limited from nine to ten hours daily, except in the harvest or sugar season, during which time the working hours are eighteen a-day. No slave under sixteen or over sixty can be employed on task-work, or at any age at a work not suited to his or her strength and sex.

Slave owners are required to provide their slaves with three meals a day, which must include eleven ounces of meat or salt fish, four ounces of bread, and enough starchy vegetables to equal six plantains. Additionally, they must provide each slave with two sets of clothing—everything specified—each year. It's almost ironic how fitting the phrase "Don't you wish you may get 'em?" is here. Spain is so caring towards her slaves that even the material for infants' clothes under three years of age is regulated; a different material for ages three to six; and then a rule that from ages six to fourteen, girls must wear shirts and boys must wear pants. This excessive parental concern from the Government is quite touching. Another regulation limits the working hours to nine to ten hours a day, except during harvest or sugar season, when work hours increase to eighteen hours a day. No slave under sixteen or over sixty can be assigned to task work, nor can anyone be assigned to a job that doesn't match their strength and gender.

Old slaves must be kept by their master, and cannot be freed for the purpose of getting rid of the support of them. Upon a plantation, the houses must be built on a dry position, well ventilated, and the sexes kept apart, and a proper hospital provided for them. By another law, marriage is inculcated on moral grounds, and the master of the slave is required to purchase the wife, so that they may both be under one roof; if he declines the honour, then the owner of the wife is to purchase the husband; and if that fails, a third party is to buy both: failing all these efforts, the law appears non-plused, and leaves their fate to Providence. If the wife has any children under three years of age, they must be sold with her. The law can compel an owner to sell any slave upon whom he may be proved to have exercised cruelty; should any party offer him the price he demands, he may close the bargain at once, but if they do not agree, his value is to be appraised by two arbiters, one chosen by each party, and if either decline naming an arbiter, a law officer acts ex officio. Any slave producing fifty dollars (ten pounds) as a portion of his ransom-money, the master is obliged to fix a price upon him, at which his ransom may be purchased; he then becomes a coartado, and whatever sums he can save his master is bound to receive in part payment, and, should he be sold, the price must not exceed the price originally named, after subtracting therefrom the amount he has advanced for his ransom. Each successive purchaser must buy him subject to these conditions. In all disputes as to original price or completion of the ransom, the Government appoints a law officer on behalf of the slave. The punishments of the slave are imprisonment, stocks, &c.; when the lash is used, the number of stripes is limited to twenty-five.

Old slaves must be kept by their owner and cannot be freed just to avoid supporting them. On a plantation, the houses should be built in a dry area, well-ventilated, with the sexes kept apart, and a proper hospital must be provided for them. Another law emphasizes the importance of marriage on moral grounds, requiring the slave owner to buy the wife so that they can live together; if the owner refuses, then the wife’s owner must buy the husband. If that doesn’t work, a third party is to buy both; if none of these solutions are successful, the law seems unable to resolve the situation and leaves their fate to Providence. If the wife has any children under three years old, they must be sold with her. The law can force an owner to sell any slave if it's proven that he has been cruel; if someone offers the price he wants, he can finalize the sale immediately. If there's no agreement, a valuation will be made by two arbiters, one chosen by each party. If either side refuses to name an arbiter, a legal officer will act on behalf of the process. Any slave who can come up with fifty dollars (ten pounds) as part of his ransom money must have a price set by the owner for his release. He then becomes a coartado, and any money he can save has to be accepted by the owner as partial payment. If he is sold, the selling price must not exceed the original price, minus the amount he has paid towards his ransom. Each new buyer must comply with these conditions. In any disputes regarding the original price or the completion of the ransom, the Government will appoint a legal officer to represent the slave. Punishments for slaves include imprisonment, stocks, etc.; if the lash is used, the number of stripes is limited to twenty-five.

The few regulations I have quoted are sufficient to show how carefully the law has fenced-in the slave from bad treatment. I believe the laws of no other country in regard to slaves are so merciful, excepting always Peru; but, alas! though the law is as fair as the outside of the whited sepulchre, the practice is as foul as the inside thereof; nor can one ever expect that it should be otherwise, when we see that, following the example of the treaty-breaking, slave-importing Queen Mother, every official, from the highest government authority down to the lowest petty custom-house officer, exposes his honesty daily in the dirty market of bribery.

The few regulations I’ve mentioned are enough to show how carefully the law has protected slaves from mistreatment. I think no other country’s laws regarding slaves are as compassionate, except for Peru; but sadly, while the law appears to be just like a pristine white tomb, the reality is as grim as what’s inside it. We can’t expect things to be any different when we see that, following the lead of the treaty-breaking, slave-importing Queen Mother, every official, from the highest government leader to the lowest customs officer, compromises their integrity daily in the corrupt market of bribery.

A short summary of the increase of slave population may be interesting, as showing that the charges made against the Cubans of only keeping up the numbers of the slaves by importation is not quite correct. In the year 1835 a treaty was made with Spain, renewing the abolition of slave traffic, to which she had assented in 1817 by words which her subsequent deeds belied. At this latter date, the slave population amounted to 290,000, since which period she has proved the value of plighted faith by introducing upwards of 100,000 slaves, which would bring the total up to 390,000. The present slave population, I have before remarked, amounts to 600,000, which would give as the increase by births during nearly twenty years, 210,000. If we take into consideration the ravages of epidemics, and the serious additional labour caused by the long duration of the sugar harvest, we may fairly conclude, as far as increase by birth is admitted as evidence, that the treatment of slaves in Cuba will stand comparison with that of the slave in the United States, especially when it is borne in mind that the addition of slave territory in the latter has made the breeding of slaves a regular business.

A brief summary of the growth of the slave population might be interesting, as it shows that the claims against the Cubans of only maintaining the slave numbers through importation aren't entirely accurate. In 1835, a treaty was signed with Spain, renewing the ban on the slave trade, which she had agreed to in 1817, despite her later actions contradicting that promise. At that time, the slave population was 290,000. Since then, she has proven her lack of integrity by bringing in over 100,000 more slaves, raising the total to 390,000. The current slave population, as I have mentioned before, is around 600,000, indicating a natural increase of 210,000 over nearly twenty years. When we consider the impact of epidemics and the significant workload caused by the prolonged sugar harvest, we can reasonably conclude that, based on birth rates, the treatment of slaves in Cuba can be compared to that of slaves in the United States, especially since the expansion of slave territory there has turned slavery breeding into a regular business.

The increase of the produce of Cuba may very naturally be ascribed to the augmentation of slave labour, and to the improvements in machinery; but there is another cause which is very apt to be overlooked, though I think there can be no doubt it has exercised the most powerful influence in producing that result: I allude to the comparative monopoly of the sugar trade, which the events of late years have thrown into her hands.

The growth of Cuba's agricultural output can easily be attributed to the rise in slave labor and advancements in machinery. However, there's another reason that's often overlooked, but I believe it has played a significant role in this outcome: I'm referring to the virtual monopoly on the sugar trade that recent events have given her.

When England manumitted the 750,000 slaves in the neighbouring islands, the natural law of reaction came into play, and the negro who had been forced to work hard, now chose to take his ease, and his absolute necessities were all that he cared to supply: a little labour sufficed for that, and he consequently became in his turn almost the master. The black population, unprepared in any way for the sudden change, became day by day more idle and vicious, the taxes of the islands increased, and the circulation issued by the banks decreased in an equally fearful ratio. When sugar the produce of slave labour was admitted into England, a short time after the emancipation, upon the same terms as the produce of the free islands, as a natural consequence, the latter, who could only command labour at high wages and for uncertain time, were totally unable to compete with the cheap labour and long hours of work in Cuba; nearly every proprietor in our West India colonies feel into deep distress,—some became totally ruined. One property which had cost 118,000l., so totally lost its value, owing to these changes in the law, that its price fell to 16,000l. In Demerara, the sugar produce sank from 104,000,000 lbs. to 61,000,000 lbs., and coffee from 9,000,000 lbs. to 91,000 lbs., while 1,500,000 lbs. of cotton disappeared entirely.

When England freed the 750,000 slaves in the nearby islands, the natural law of reaction kicked in, and the formerly forced laborers chose to relax, only caring about meeting their basic needs. A little work was enough for that, and as a result, they ended up almost becoming the bosses themselves. The black population, caught off guard by the sudden change, became increasingly idle and unruly over time. The taxes in the islands went up, while the money circulating from the banks decreased at an alarming rate. When sugar, a product of slave labor, was allowed into England shortly after emancipation on the same terms as products from free islands, the latter were at a huge disadvantage. They could only afford to hire labor at high wages for uncertain periods, making it impossible to compete with the cheap labor and longer working hours in Cuba. Nearly every landowner in our West Indian colonies fell into serious financial trouble; some ended up completely ruined. One estate that had cost £118,000 plummeted in value due to these law changes, dropping to just £16,000. In Demerara, sugar production dropped from 104 million lbs. to 61 million lbs., and coffee from 9 million lbs. to 91,000 lbs., while 1.5 million lbs. of cotton vanished entirely.

These are no fictions, they are plain facts, borne testimony to in many instances by the governors of the colonies; and I might quote an infinite number of similar statements, all tending to prove the rapid growth of idleness and vice in the emancipated slaves, and the equally rapid ruin of the unfortunate proprietor. The principles upon which we legislated when removing the sugar duties is a mystery to me, unless I accept the solution, so degrading to the nation, "that humanity is a secondary consideration to £ s.d., and that justice goes for nothing." If such were not the principles on which we legislated, there never was a more complete failure. Not content with demoralizing the slave and ruining the owner, by our hasty and ill-matured plan of emancipation, we gave the latter a dirty kick when he was falling, by removing the little protection we had all put pledged our national faith that he should retain; and thus it was we threw nearly the whole West India sugar trade into the hands of Cuba, stimulating her energy, increasing her produce, and clinching the fetters of the slave with that hardest holding of all rivets—the doubled value of his labour.

These are not made-up stories; they are clear facts, confirmed in many cases by the governors of the colonies. I could list countless similar statements, all showing the quick rise of laziness and wrongdoing among the freed slaves and the equally swift downfall of the unfortunate landowners. The reasons behind the decisions we made when changing the sugar duties are a mystery to me, unless I accept the troubling explanation that "humanity is secondary to money, and justice doesn't matter." If that wasn't the reasoning behind our laws, then there has never been a more complete failure. Not only did we demoralize the former slaves and ruin the landowners with our rushed and poorly thought-out plan for emancipation, but we also dealt a final blow to the latter by taking away the little protection we had promised them. In doing so, we practically handed over the entire West Indian sugar trade to Cuba, boosting her economy, increasing her output, and tightening the chains on slaves by doubling the value of their labor.

Perhaps my reader may say I am taking a party and political view of the question. I repudiate the charge in toto: I have nothing to do with politics: I merely state facts, which I consider it requisite should be brought forward, in order that the increase of Cuban produce may not be attributed to erroneous causes. For this purpose it was necessary to show that the ruin we have brought upon the free West Indian colonies is the chief cause of the increased and increasing prosperity of their slave rival; at the same time, it is but just to remark, that the establishment of many American houses in Cuba has doubtless had some effect in adding to the commercial activity of the island.

Perhaps my reader might say that I’m taking a biased political stance on this issue. I completely reject that accusation: I have nothing to do with politics. I’m simply stating facts that I believe should be highlighted so that the growth of Cuban produce isn't wrongly attributed to false reasons. To do this, it was essential to demonstrate that the destruction we've caused in the free West Indian colonies is the main reason for the growing success of their enslaved competitors. At the same time, it's fair to note that the establishment of many American businesses in Cuba has certainly contributed to the island's commercial activity.

I have, in the preceding pages, shown the retrogression of some parts of the West Indies, since the passing of the Emancipation and Sugar-Duty Acts. Let me now take a cursory view of the progression of Cuba during the same period.—Annual produce—

I have, in the pages before this, shown the decline of certain areas in the West Indies since the passing of the Emancipation and Sugar-Duty Acts. Now, let me briefly look at the progress of Cuba during the same time.—Annual produce—

              Before Emancipation.           1852.

    Sugar        300,000,000 lbs.          620,000,000 lbs.
    Molasses     125,000,000  "            220,000,000  "
    Leaf Tobacco   6,000,000  "             10,000,000  "
    Coffee        30,000,000  "             19,000,000  "

The sugar manufactories during that time had also increased from eight hundred to upwards of sixteen hundred. Can any one calmly compare this marvellous progression of Cuba with the equally astounding retrogression of our Antilles, and fail to come to the irresistible conclusion that the prosperity of the one is intimately connected with the distress of the other.

The sugar factories during that time had also increased from eight hundred to over sixteen hundred. Can anyone calmly compare this amazing growth in Cuba with the equally remarkable decline of our Antilles and not come to the undeniable conclusion that the success of one is closely linked to the suffering of the other?

While stating the annual produce of tobacco, I should observe that upwards of 180,000,000 of cigars, and nearly 2,000,000 boxes of cigarettes, were exported in 1852, independent of the tobacco-leaf before mentioned. Professor J.F.W. Johnston, in that curious and able work entitled Chemistry of Common Life, styles tobacco "the first subject in the vegetable kingdom in the power of its service to man,"—some of my lady friends, I fear, will not approve of this opinion,—and he further asserts that 4,500,000,000 lbs. thereof are annually dispersed throughout the earth, which, at twopence the pound, would realize the enormous sum of 37,000,000l.

While discussing the yearly production of tobacco, I should note that over 180,000,000 cigars and nearly 2,000,000 boxes of cigarettes were exported in 1852, not counting the previously mentioned tobacco leaves. Professor J.F.W. Johnston, in his interesting and insightful work titled Chemistry of Common Life, calls tobacco "the most important product in the plant kingdom for its usefulness to humans,"—some of my female friends, I'm afraid, won't agree with this view,—and he also claims that 4,500,000,000 lbs. of it are distributed worldwide each year, which, at two pence per pound, would amount to the staggering total of £37,000,000.

If smoking may be called the popular enjoyment of the island, billiards and dominoes may be called the popular games, and the lottery the popular excitement. There are generally fifteen ordinary lotteries, and two extraordinary, every year. The ordinary consist of 32,000l. paid, and 24,000l. thereof as prizes. There are 238 prizes, the highest being 600l., and the lowest 40l. The extraordinary consist of 54,400l. paid, of which 40,800l. are drawn as prizes. There are 206 prizes, the highest of which is 20,000l., and the lowest 40l.; from which it will appear, according to Cocker, that the sums drawn annually as prizes are very nearly 150,000l. less than the sums paid. Pretty pickings for Government! As may naturally be supposed, the excitement produced by this constitutional gambling—which has its nearest counterpart in our own Stock Exchange—is quite intense; and as the time for drawing approaches, people may be seen in all the cafés and public places, hawking and auctioning the billets at premium, like so many Barnums with Jenny Lind tickets. One curious feature in the lotteries here is the interest the niggers take in them. To understand this, I must explain to you that the coloured population are composed of various African tribes, and each tribe keeps comparatively separate from the others; they then form a kind of club among their own tribe, for the purpose of purchasing the freedom of some of their enslaved brethren, who, I believe, receive assistance in proportion as they contribute to the funds, and bear such a character as shall interpose no obstacle to their ransom being permitted. A portion of their funds is frequently employed in the purchase of lottery-tickets, and a deep spirit of gambling is the natural consequence; for though the stake entered is dollars, the prize, if won, is freedom. These lotteries date back to 1812; and if they have always been kept up as before explained, they must have contributed something like ten millions sterling to the Government during their forty years' working.

If smoking is considered the popular pastime of the island, then billiards and dominoes are the popular games, and the lottery is the popular thrill. Every year, there are usually fifteen regular lotteries and two special ones. The regular lotteries have a total payout of 32,000l, with 24,000l allocated for prizes. There are 238 prizes, the highest being 600l and the lowest 40l. The special lotteries have a payout of 54,400l, with 40,800l paid out as prizes. There are 206 prizes, the highest of which is 20,000l and the lowest 40l; according to Cocker, this shows that the annual prize amounts are nearly 150,000l less than the total paid in. Quite a nice deal for the Government! As you can imagine, the excitement generated by this regulated gambling, which is somewhat similar to our own Stock Exchange, is quite intense; and as the drawing date approaches, people can be seen in all the cafés and public spaces, selling and auctioning the tickets at a premium, like performers with tickets to a big show. One interesting aspect of the lotteries here is the enthusiasm of the Black community for them. To explain this, I need to mention that the colored population consists of various African tribes, and each tribe largely keeps to itself; they then form a sort of club within their tribe to help buy the freedom of some of their enslaved peers, who receive support based on their contributions to the fund and their reputation, which shouldn't hinder their ransom. Part of their funds is often spent on lottery tickets, leading to a strong gambling culture; even though the stakes are in dollars, the prize, if won, is freedom. These lotteries have been around since 1812, and if they have been maintained as previously described, they must have contributed roughly ten million pounds to the Government over their forty years of operation.

A friend told me of a shameful instance of injustice connected with these lotteries. A poor slave who had saved enough money to buy a ticket, did so; and, drawing a small prize, immediately went off to his master, and presented it to him as a part of his redemption-money. The master having ascertained how he obtained it, explained to him that, as a slave, he could not hold property; he then quietly pocketed it, and sent poor Sambo about his business. What a beautiful commentary this is on the law respecting Coartados, which I inserted a few pages back. I must, however, remark that, from the inquiries I made, and from my own observations of their countenances and amusements, the impression left on my mind is, that the slaves are quite as happy here as in the United States; the only disadvantage that they labour under being, that the sugar harvest and manufacture last much longer in Cuba, and the labour thereof is by far the hardest drain upon the endurance of the slave. The free negroes I consider fully as well off as those in the Southern States, and immeasurably more comfortable than those who are domiciled in the Northern or Free States of the Union. The number of free negroes in Cuba amounts to one-fourth of the whole coloured population, while in the United States it only amounts to one-ninth—proving the great facilities for obtaining freedom which the island offers, or the higher cultivation of the negro, which makes him strive for it more laboriously. I will not attempt to draw any comparison between the scenes of horror with which, doubtless, both parties are chargeable, but which, for obvious reasons, are carefully concealed from the traveller's eye.

A friend shared with me a troubling story of injustice related to these lotteries. A poor slave had managed to save enough money to buy a ticket and did just that. After winning a small prize, he went to his master and offered it as part of his redemption money. Once the master figured out how he got it, he explained that, as a slave, he couldn't own property. He then pocketed the money and sent poor Sambo on his way. This says a lot about the law regarding Coartados, which I mentioned a few pages back. However, I must note that from the questions I asked and my own observations of their faces and activities, I got the impression that the slaves here are just as happy as those in the United States. The only downside is that the sugar harvest and production last much longer in Cuba, making the labor a much tougher strain on the slaves. I believe the free Black people are just as well off as those in the Southern States and significantly more comfortable than those who live in the Northern or Free States of the Union. In Cuba, free Black people make up a quarter of the entire colored population, while in the United States, they account for only a ninth—showing the greater opportunities for gaining freedom that the island offers, or the higher aspirations of the Black community that drive them to seek it more vigorously. I won’t try to compare the horrific situations that both groups likely face, but which are, for obvious reasons, carefully hidden from the eyes of travelers.

Among the curious anomalies of some people, is that of a dislike to be called by the national name, if they have a local one. The islanders feel quite affronted if you call them Españoles; and a native of Old Spain would feel even more affronted if you called him a Cubano or an Havanero. The appellations are as mutually offensive as were in the olden times those of Southron and Scot, although Cuba is eternally making a boast of her loyalty. The manner of a Cuban is as stiff and hidalgoish as that of any old Spaniard; in fact, so far as my short acquaintance with the mother country and the colony enables me to judge, I see little or no difference. Some of them, however, have a dash of fun about them, as the two following little squibs will show.

Among the strange quirks of some people is their dislike of being called by the national name if they have a local one. Islanders feel quite offended if you call them Españoles; and a person from mainland Spain would be even more upset if you referred to him as a Cubano or an Havanero. These names are as mutually offensive as those of Southron and Scot were in the past, although Cuba constantly prides itself on its loyalty. A Cuban's demeanor is as stiff and noble as that of any old Spaniard; in fact, based on my brief experience with both the mother country and the colony, I see little to no difference. However, some of them do have a playful side, as the two following little jokes will demonstrate.

It appears that a certain Conde de----, who had lately been decorated, was a most notorious rogue; in consequence of which, some wag chalked up on his door in large letters, during the night, the following lines, which, of course, were in everybody's mouth soon after the sun had risen:—

It seems that a certain Conde de----, who had recently received an award, was quite the infamous scoundrel; as a result, someone humorously wrote on his door in big letters overnight the following lines, which, of course, everyone was talking about soon after sunrise:—

In the time of the barbaric nations

Thieves were hanged on crosses;

But today in the Age of Enlightenment

Thieves are hanged on crosses.

A play upon words is at all times a hopeless task to transfer to another language; nevertheless, for the benefit of those who are unacquainted with Spanish, I will convey the idea as well as I can in English;—

A play on words is always a difficult challenge to translate into another language; however, for the sake of those who are not familiar with Spanish, I will do my best to convey the idea in English;—

The ancient decree was to hang the thief on the cross;

But now we see the cross on the thief suspended.

The idea is of very ancient date, and equally well known in Italy and Spain; but I believe the Spanish verses given above are original.

The concept is very old and is well-known in both Italy and Spain; however, I believe the Spanish verses mentioned above are original.

The following was written upon a wealthy man who lived like a hermit, and was reported to be very averse to paying for anything. He had, to the astonishment of everybody, given a grand entertainment the night before. On his door appeared—

The following was written about a wealthy man who lived like a hermit and was known for being extremely reluctant to spend money. To everyone's surprise, he had hosted a lavish party the night before. On his door appeared—

"El Marquis de C---- does what he must."

"And it must be for what it does."

It is useless to try and carry this into Saxon. In drawing it from the Spanish well, the bottom must come out of the translationary bucket. The best version I can offer is—

It’s pointless to try to put this into Saxon. When pulling it from the Spanish well, the bottom has to come out of the translation bucket. The best version I can provide is—

"He hosts a party, which he should do,"

But by doing that, he does his tradesmen too.

I am aware my English version is tame and insipid, though, perhaps, not quite as much so as a translation I once met with of the sentence with which it was said Timoleon, Duc de Brissac, used to apostrophize himself before the looking-glass every morning. The original runs thus:— "Timoleon, Duc de Brissac, Dieu t'a fait gentilhomme, le roi t'a fait duc, fais toi la barbe, pour faire quelque chose." The translation was charmingly ridiculous, and ran thus:—"Timoleon, Duke of Brissac, Providence made you a gentleman; the king gave you a dukedom; shave yourself by way of doing something."—But I wander terribly. Reader, you must excuse me.

I know my English version is pretty bland and dull, but maybe not as much as a translation I once came across of the phrase that Timoleon, Duke of Brissac, would say to himself in the mirror every morning. The original goes like this:— "Timoleon, Duc de Brissac, Dieu t'a fait gentilhomme, le roi t'a fait duc, fais toi la barbe, pour faire quelque chose." The translation was hilariously silly and went like this:—"Timoleon, Duke of Brissac, Providence made you a gentleman; the king gave you a dukedom; shave yourself to do something."—But I’m getting off track. Reader, please forgive me.

I one day asked an intelligent friend, long resident in the island, whether any of the governors had ever done any good to the island, or whether they were all satisfied by filling their pockets with handsome bribes. He told me that the first governor-general who had rendered real service to the people was Tacon. On his arrival, the whole place was so infested with rogues and villains that neither property nor even life was secure after dusk. Gambling, drunkenness, and vice of every kind rode rampant. He gave all evil-doers one week's warning, at the expiration of which all who could not give a satisfactory account of themselves were to be severely punished. Long accustomed to idle threats, they treated his warning with utter indifference; but they soon found their mistake, to their cost. Inflexible in purpose, iron-handed in rule, unswerving in justice, he treated nobles, clergy, and commoners alike, and, before the fortnight was concluded, twelve hundred were in banishment or in durance vile. Their accomplices in guilt stood aghast at this new order of things, and, foreseeing their fate, either bolted, reformed, or fell victims to it, and Havana became as quiet and orderly as a church-parade. Shops, stores, and houses sprung up in every direction. A magnificent opera-house was built outside the town, on the Grand Paseo, and named after the governor-general; nothing can exceed the lightness, airiness, and taste of the interior. I never saw its equal in any building of a similar nature, and it is in every respect most perfectly adapted to this lovely climate.

One day, I asked a smart friend who had lived on the island for a long time if any of the governors had actually helped the island or if they were all just happy to line their pockets with nice bribes. He told me that the first governor-general who truly benefited the people was Tacon. When he arrived, the whole place was overrun with crooks and criminals, and neither property nor even life was safe after dark. Gambling, drinking, and all sorts of vices were rampant. He gave all wrongdoers a week’s notice, after which anyone who couldn't explain themselves satisfactorily would be harshly punished. Used to empty threats, they completely ignored his warning; but they soon realized their mistake, and it cost them. Stubborn in his goals, strict in his rule, and unwavering in his sense of justice, he treated nobles, clergy, and common people the same. Before the two weeks were up, twelve hundred people were in exile or locked up. Their guilty partners were shocked by this new situation and, fearing what would happen to them, either ran away, changed their ways, or became victims of it, transforming Havana into a place as calm and orderly as a church parade. Shops, stores, and houses appeared everywhere. A magnificent opera house was built outside the town on the Grand Paseo and named after the governor-general; nothing could surpass the light, airy design and taste of the interior. I’ve never seen anything like it in any building of its kind, and it is perfectly suited to this beautiful climate.

The next governor-general who seems to have left any permanent mark of usefulness is Valdes, whom I suppose I may be allowed to call their modern Lycurgus. It was during his rule that the laws were weeded and improved, and eventually produced in a clear and simple form. The patience he must have exhibited in this laborious occupation is evidenced by the minuteness of the details entered into, descending, as we have seen, even to the pants of bathers and the bibs of the infant nigger, but, by some unaccountable omission, giving no instructions as to the tuckers of their mammas. If Tacon was feared and respected, Valdes was beloved; and each appears to have fairly earned the reputation he obtained. Valdes was succeeded by O'Donnell, whose rule was inaugurated in negro blood. Frightful hurricanes soon followed, and were probably sent in mercy to purify the island from the pollutions of suffering and slaughter. During the rule of his successor, Roncali, the rebel Lopez appears on the stage. The American campaign in Mexico had stirred up a military ardour which extended to the rowdies, and a piratical expedition was undertaken, with Lopez at the head. He had acquired a name for courage in the Spanish army, and was much liked by many of them, partly from indulging in the unofficer-like practice of gambling and drinking with officers and men. His first attempt at a landing was ludicrously hopeless, and he was very glad to re-embark with a whole skin; but he was not the man to allow one failure to dishearten him, for, independent of his courage, he had a feeling of revenge to gratify.[AA] Having recruited his forces, he landed the following year, 1851, with a stronger and better-equipped force of American piratical brigands, and succeeded in stirring up a few Cubans to rebellion. He maintained himself for a few days, struggling with a courage worthy of a better cause. The pirates were defeated; Lopez was made prisoner, and died by the garotte, at Havana, on the 1st of September. Others also of the band paid the penalty of the law; and the ruffian crew, who escaped to the United States, now constitute a kind of nucleus for the "Lone Star," "Filibustero," and other such pests of the community to gather round, being ready at any moment to start on a buccaneering expedition, if they can only find another Lopez ass enough to lead them.

The next governor-general who seemed to have made a lasting impact was Valdes, who I suppose can be considered their modern-day Lycurgus. During his time in office, the laws were revised and improved, resulting in a clear and straightforward format. The patience he must have shown in this tedious task is reflected in the meticulous details he recorded, going down to the bathers' pants and the bibs of the infants, but oddly leaving out any instructions regarding the tuckers of their mothers. While Tacon was feared and respected, Valdes was loved; both seemed to have rightfully earned their reputations. Valdes was succeeded by O'Donnell, whose rule began with violence. Horrific hurricanes soon followed, likely sent to cleanse the island from the suffering and bloodshed. During the term of his successor, Roncali, the rebel Lopez appeared on the scene. The American campaign in Mexico had stirred up military enthusiasm that reached even the rowdy crowd, leading to a pirate expedition with Lopez at the helm. He had gained a reputation for bravery in the Spanish army and was well-liked by many, partly because he engaged in the unofficer-like behavior of gambling and drinking with the enlisted men. His first landing attempt was comically doomed, and he was lucky to leave unscathed; however, he wasn't the type to let one failure deter him, as he had a desire for revenge to satisfy. Having regrouped, he landed the following year, 1851, with a stronger, better-equipped band of American pirates, and managed to incite a few Cubans to rise against the government. He held his ground for a few days, fighting valiantly for a cause that deserved better. The pirates were defeated; Lopez was captured and executed by garrote in Havana on September 1st. Others from his group faced the law as well, and the thuggish crew that fled to the United States now forms a sort of base for the "Lone Star," "Filibustero," and other such troublemakers, always ready to embark on another pirate venture if they can find another fool like Lopez to lead them.

Concha became governor-general just before Lopez' last expedition, and the order for his execution was a most painful task for poor Concha, who had been for many years an intimate friend of his. Concha appears to have left an excellent name behind him. I always heard him called "the honest governor." He introduced a great many reforms into the civil code, and established a great many schools and scientific and literary societies. During my stay in the island, his successor, Cañedo, was the governor-general. Whenever I made inquiries about him, the most favourable answer I could get was, a chuck-up of the head, a slight "p'tt" with the lips, and an expression of the eyes indicating the sight of a most unpleasant object. The three combined required no dictionary of the Academy to interpret.[AB]

Concha became governor-general right before Lopez's last expedition, and ordering his execution was a very difficult job for poor Concha, who had been a close friend of his for many years. Concha seems to have left a great reputation behind. I always heard him referred to as "the honest governor." He introduced a lot of reforms into the civil code and set up many schools, as well as scientific and literary societies. During my time on the island, his successor, Cañedo, was the governor-general. Whenever I asked about him, the most positive response I could get was a shrug of the shoulders, a slight "p'tt" with the lips, and a look in the eyes that suggested something really unpleasant. The combination of the three needed no translation to understand.[AB]

The future of this rich and lovely island, who can predict? It is talked of by its powerful neighbours as "the sick man." Filibustero vultures hover above it as though it were already a putrid corpse inviting their descent; young America points to it with the absorbing index of "manifest destiny;" gold is offered for it; Ostend conferences are held about it; the most sober senators cry respecting it—"Patience, when the pear is ripe, it must drop into our lap." Old Spain—torn by faction, and ruined by corruption—supports its tottering treasury from it. Thus, plundered by friends, coveted by neighbours, and assailed by pirates, it lies like a helpless anatomical subject, with the ocean for a dissecting-table, on one side whereof stands a mother sucking its blood, and on the other "Lone Stars" gashing its limbs, while in the background, a young and vigorous republic is seen anxiously waiting for the whole carcass. If I ask, "Where shall vitality be sought?" Echo answers "Where?" If I ask, "Where shall I look for hope?" the very breath of the question extinguishes the flickering taper. Who, then, can shadow forth the fate that is reserved for this tropical gem of the ocean, where all around is so dark and louring?... A low voice, borne on a western breeze, whispers in my ear—"I guess I can."

The future of this beautiful island is anyone's guess. Its powerful neighbors refer to it as "the sick man." Filibuster vultures circle above, as if it were already a rotting corpse waiting for their arrival; young America points to it with the eager finger of "manifest destiny;" there's gold being offered for it; Ostend conferences are being held about it; even the most serious senators are saying—"Just wait, when the time is right, it will fall into our hands." Old Spain—divided by factions and weakened by corruption—depends on it to support its crumbling treasury. So, plundered by allies, desired by neighbors, and attacked by pirates, it exists like a vulnerable subject lying on an operating table, with the ocean as its dissecting board, one side drained by a mother feeding on its blood, and the other "Lone Stars" tearing at its limbs, while in the background stands a young, strong republic eagerly awaiting the whole body. If I ask, "Where can I find life?" the echo responds "Where?" If I ask, "Where should I search for hope?" the very question snuffs out the flickering candle. So, who can predict the fate of this tropical jewel of the ocean, surrounded by such darkness?... A soft voice carried on a western breeze whispers in my ear—"I think I can."

Cuba, farewell!

Goodbye, Cuba!

[Note: The subsequent squabbles between the Cuban authorities and the United States have taken place long since my departure, and are too complicated to enter into without more accurate information than I possess.]

[Note: The arguments between the Cuban authorities and the United States have happened long after I left, and they're too complicated to discuss without more accurate information than I have.]


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

I put up at "The Havana House," where I found everything very clean, and the proprietor, an American, very civil. It is now kept by his son.


This was written in January, 1853.


The Filibustero movement in the United States has caused Spain to increase her military force considerably.


When first suspected of treason, he had been hunted with dogs like a wild beast, and, with considerable difficulty, escaped to America.


Those who desire more detailed information respecting Cuba will find it in a work entitled La Reine des Antilles. Par LE VICOMTE GUSTAVE D'HARPONVILLE. 1850.



CHAPTER XIII.

Change of Dynasty.




The month of February was drawing to a close, when I took my passage on board the "Isabel," bound for Charleston. A small coin removed all difficulty about embarking luggage, cigars, &c.; the kettle was boiling, hands shook violently, bells rang rapidly, non-passengers flew down to shore-boats; round go the wheels, waving go the kerchiefs, and down fall the tears. The "Isabel" bounds o'er the ripp'less waters; forts and dungeons, as we gaze astern, fade from the view; an indistinct shade is all by which the eye can recal the lovely isle of Cuba; and, lest memory should fail, the piles of oranges, about four feet square, all round the upper-deck, are ready to refresh it. How different the "Isabel" from the "Cherokee!" Mr. Law might do well to take a cruise in the former; and, if he had any emulation, he would sell all his dirty old tubs for firewood, and invest the proceeds in the "Isabel" style of vessel. Land a-head!--a flourishing little village appears, with watch-towers high as minarets. What can all this mean?

February was coming to an end when I got on the "Isabel," headed for Charleston. A small coin solved all the problems with boarding luggage, cigars, etc.; the kettle was boiling, hands were shaking, bells were ringing fast, and non-passengers rushed down to the shoreboats; the wheels were turning, handkerchiefs were waving, and tears were falling. The "Isabel" sped over the calm waters; forts and prisons faded from view as we looked back; just a faint outline is all that reminds us of the beautiful island of Cuba; and, to jog the memory, stacks of oranges, about four feet square, are all around the upper deck, ready to refresh our minds. The "Isabel" is so different from the "Cherokee!" Mr. Law would do well to take a trip on this one; if he had any ambition, he'd sell all his old, worn-out ships for firewood and invest in a vessel like the "Isabel." Land ahead! A thriving little village appears, with watchtowers as tall as minarets. What could all this mean?

This is a thriving, happy community, fixed on the most dreary and unhealthy-looking point imaginable, and deriving all their wealth and happiness from the misfortunes of others. It is Key West, a village of wreckers, who, doubtless, pray earnestly for a continuance and increase of the changing currents, which are eternally drifting some ill-fated barque on the ever-growing banks and coral reefs of these treacherous and dangerous waters; the lofty watch-towers are their Pisgah, and the stranded barques their Land of Promise. The sight of one is doubtless as refreshing to their sight as the clustering grapes of Eschol were to the wandering Israelites of old. So thoroughly does the wrecking spirit pervade this little community, that they remind one of the "Old Joe Miller," which gives an account of a clergyman who, seeing all his congregation rise from their seats at the joyous cry of, "A wreck! a wreck!" called them to order with an irresistible voice of thunder, and deliberately commencing to despoil himself of his surplice, added, "Gentlemen, a fair start, if you please!"

This is a lively, happy community, situated at the most bleak and unhealthy-looking spot you can imagine, getting all their wealth and happiness from the misfortunes of others. It’s Key West, a village of salvagers who likely pray earnestly for the ongoing and increased shifts in currents that constantly push some unfortunate ship onto the ever-growing sandbanks and coral reefs of these treacherous waters; the tall watchtowers serve as their guiding points, and the wrecked ships are their promised land. Spotting one must be as refreshing to them as the clusters of grapes from Eschol were to the wandering Israelites long ago. The wrecking spirit is so ingrained in this little community that they remind one of the "Old Joe Miller," which tells the story of a clergyman who, witnessing all his congregation spring from their seats at the joyful shout of, "A wreck! A wreck!" called them to order with a thunderous voice, and as he started to remove his surplice, added, "Gentlemen, a fair start, if you please!"

We picked up a couple of captains here, whose ships had tasted these bitter waters, and who were on their road to New York to try and make the best of a bad job. We had some very agreeable companions on board; but we had others very much the contrary, conspicuous among whom was an undeniable Hebrew but no Nathanael. He was one of those pompous loud talkers, whose every word and work bespoke vulgarity in its most obnoxious form, and whose obtuseness in matters of manners was so great that nothing short of the point of your shoe could have made him understand how offensive he was. He spoke of courts in Europe, and of the Vice-regal court in Ireland, as though he had the entrée of them all; which it was palpable to the most superficial observer he never could have had, except possibly when, armed with a dingy bag on his shoulder and an "Ol clo'" on his lips, he sought an investment in cast-off garments. He was taking cigars, which, from their quantity, were evidently for sale; and as the American Government is very liberal in allowing passengers to enter cigars, never—I believe—refusing any one the privilege of five hundred, he was beating up for friends who had no cigars to divide his speculations among, so as to avoid the duty; at last his arrangements were completed, and his mind at ease.

We picked up a couple of captains here whose ships had gone through these rough waters, and who were on their way to New York to make the best of a bad situation. We had some really pleasant company on board, but we also had others who were the complete opposite, especially one loud, flashy guy who was definitely Hebrew but not a Nathanael. He was one of those obnoxious loudmouths, whose every word and action screamed crudeness in the worst way, and whose cluelessness about manners was so extreme that nothing short of the tip of your shoe would have made him realize how offensive he was. He talked about courts in Europe and the Vice-regal court in Ireland as if he had full access to all of them; it was clear to even the most casual observer that he never could have, except maybe when, wearing a shabby bag on his shoulder and with "Ol clo'" on his lips, he looked for an investment in discarded clothes. He was carrying cigars that, judging by their number, were clearly for sale; and since the American Government is quite generous in allowing passengers to bring cigars, never—I believe—denying anyone the privilege of five hundred, he was trying to find friends who didn’t have cigars to share his stash with, so he could avoid the duty. Eventually, he got everything sorted and felt relieved.

On entering the port of Charleston he got up the box containing his treasures, and was about to open it, when, to my intense delight and amusement, an officer of the ship stayed his hasty hand. "What's that for?" exclaimed the wrathful Israelite. "I guess that box is in the manifest," was the calm reply, "and you can't touch it till it goes to the custom-house." Jonathan had "done" the Hebrew; and besides the duty, he had the pleasure of paying freight on them also; while, to add to his satisfaction, he enjoyed the sight of all the other passengers taking their five hundred or so unmolested, while compelled to pay duty on every cigar himself. But we must leave the Jew, the "Isabel"—ay, Charleston itself. "Hurry hurry, bubble bubble, toil and trouble!" Washington must be reached before the 4th of March, or we shall not see the Senate and the other House in session. Steamer and rail; on we dash. The boiling horse checks his speed; the inconveniences of the journey are all forgotten: we are at Washington, and the all-absorbing thought is, "Where shall we get a bed?"

Upon arriving in the port of Charleston, he got the box with his treasures and was about to open it when, to my great delight and amusement, a ship officer stopped his quick hand. "What's that for?" shouted the angry person. "I believe that box is on the manifest," was the calm response, "and you can't touch it until it goes to customs." Jonathan had dealt with the Hebrew; and in addition to the customs duty, he also had the pleasure of paying freight on them; while, to add to his frustration, he watched all the other passengers take their five hundred or so items without any issue, while he was forced to pay duty on every cigar himself. But we must leave the Jewish man, the "Isabel"—yes, Charleston itself. "Hurry hurry, bubble bubble, toil and trouble!" We need to reach Washington before March 4th, or we won't see the Senate and the other House in session. Steamer and rail; off we go. The racing horse slows down; all the inconveniences of the journey are forgotten: we are in Washington, and the only thought is, "Where can we find a place to sleep?"

My companion[AC] and myself drove about from hotel to boarding-house, from boarding-house to hotel, and from hotel to the Capitol, seeking a resting-place in vain. Every chink and cranny was crammed; the reading-rooms of the hotels had from one to two dozen stretcher beds in each of them. 'Twas getting on for midnight; Hope's taper was flickering faintly, when a police-officer came to the rescue, and recommended us to try a small boarding-house at which he was himself lodging. There, as an especial favour, we got two beds put into a room where another lodger was already snoring; but fatigue and sleep soon obliterated that fact from our remembrance. Next morning, while lying in a half doze, I heard something like the upsetting of a jug near my bedside, and then, a sound like mopping up; suspicious of my company, I opened my eyes, and lo! there was the owner of the third bed, deliberately mopping up the contents of the jug he had upset over the carpet, with—what do you think? His handkerchief? oh, no—his coat-tails? oh, no—a spare towel? oh, no; the savage, with the most placid indifference, was mopping it up with my sponge! He expressed so much astonishment when I remonstrated, that I supposed the poor man must have been in the habit of using his own sponge for such purposes, and my ire subsided gradually as he wrung out the sponge by an endless succession of vigorous squeezes, accompanying each with a word of apology. So much for my first night at Washington.

My companion[AC] and I drove around from hotel to boarding house, from boarding house to hotel, and from hotel to the Capitol, trying to find a place to rest but coming up empty. Every nook and cranny was packed; the reading rooms in the hotels had one to two dozen stretcher beds each. It was getting close to midnight; hope was fading when a police officer came to our rescue and suggested we try a small boarding house where he was staying. There, as a special favor, we got two beds squeezed into a room where another guest was already snoring; but fatigue and sleep quickly made us forget that detail. The next morning, while I was lying in a half doze, I heard something that sounded like a jug being knocked over near my bedside, followed by a noise that resembled someone cleaning up. Suspicious of my roommate, I opened my eyes and, lo and behold! the owner of the third bed was calmly mopping up the contents of the jug he had spilled on the carpet—what do you think? With his handkerchief? Nope. His coat tails? Nope. A spare towel? Nope. The guy, with complete indifference, was mopping it up with my sponge! He looked so surprised when I protested that I figured the poor guy must be used to using his own sponge for that kind of thing, and my anger gradually faded as he wrung out the sponge with a continuous series of vigorous squeezes, apologizing with each one. So much for my first night in Washington.

We will pass over breakfast, and away to the Capitol. There it stands, on a rising knoll, commanding an extensive panoramic view of the town and surrounding country. The building is on a grand scale, and faced with marble, which, glittering in the sunbeams, gives it a very imposing appearance; but the increasing wants of this increasing Republic have caused two wings to be added, which are now in the course of construction. Entrance to the Senate and House of Representatives was afforded to us with that readiness and courtesy which strangers invariably experience. But, alas! the mighty spirits who had, by their power of eloquence, so often charmed and spell-bound the tenants of the senate chamber—where were they? The grave had but recently closed over the last of those giant spirits; Webster was no more! Like all similar bodies, they put off and put off, till, in the last few days of the session, a quantity of business is hustled through, and thus no scope is left for eloquent speeches; all is matter of fact, and a very business-looking body they appeared, each senator with his desk and papers before him; and when anything was to be said, it was expressed in plain, unadorned language, and free from hesitation. The only opportunity offered for eloquence was, after the inauguration, on the discussion of the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty. I will not say that the venerable senator for Delaware—Mr. Clayton—was eloquent, but he was very clear both in language and delivery, and his bearing altogether showed the honest conviction of a man who knew he was in the right, and was certain he would be ultimately so judged. His principal antagonist was the senator for Illinois—Mr. Douglas—one of the stars of the Young American party, and an aspirant to the presidential honours of the Republic. He is a stout-built man, rather short, with a massive overhanging forehead. When he rose, he did so with the evident consciousness that the gallery above him was filled with many of his political school, and thrusting both hands well into the bottom of his breeches pockets, he commenced his oration with an air of great self-confidence, occasionally drawing one hand from its concealment to aid his oratory by significant gesture. He made an excellent clap-trap—or, as they term it in America, Buncombe—speech, aiding and emphasizing, by energetic shakings of the forefinger, such passages as he thought would tell in the gallery above; his voice was loud and clear, his language blunt and fluent, and amusingly replete with "dares and daren't;" "England's in the wrong, and she knows it;" if the original treaty, by which America was to have had the canal exclusively, had been concluded, "America would have had a rod to hold over all the nations." Then came "manifest destiny;" then the mare's nest called "Monroe doctrine;" then more Buncombe about England; and then ... he sat down—satisfied, no doubt, that he had very considerably increased his chances for the "tenancy of the White House."

We’ll skip breakfast and head to the Capitol. It sits on a hill, offering a sweeping view of the town and the surrounding area. The building is impressive in size and covered in marble that sparkles in the sunlight, giving it a striking appearance. However, the growing needs of this expanding Republic have led to the construction of two new wings, which are currently being built. We were granted access to the Senate and House of Representatives with the kind of hospitality that visitors always receive. But, sadly, the great figures who had so often captivated and mesmerized the Senate chamber were gone—Webster had recently passed away! Like many similar bodies, they put things off until the last few days of the session when a lot of business gets rushed through, leaving no room for eloquent speeches; everything becomes very matter-of-fact, and the senators appeared quite business-like, each one with their desk and documents in front of them. When something needed to be said, it was done so in straightforward, unembellished language, without hesitation. The only chance for rhetoric came after the inauguration when discussing the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty. I won’t claim that the senior senator from Delaware—Mr. Clayton—was eloquent, but he was very clear in both his words and delivery, and his overall demeanor reflected the honest belief of someone who knew he was right and would ultimately be judged as such. His main opponent was the senator from Illinois—Mr. Douglas—who was one of the leading figures of the Young American party and aspired to the Presidency. He’s a solidly built, rather short man with a pronounced forehead. When he stood up, it was clear he was aware that the gallery above was filled with many of his political supporters. With both hands shoved deep into his pants pockets, he began his speech with great self-assurance, occasionally pulling one hand out to emphasize his points with gestures. He delivered a great crowd-pleasing speech, or as they call it in America, Buncombe, emphasizing certain points with energetic finger shakes aimed at the gallery above. His voice was loud and clear, his language straightforward and fluid, filled with phrases like "dares and daren't," saying, "England's in the wrong, and she knows it;" and if the original treaty—which would have given America exclusive control of the canal—had been signed, "America would have had leverage over all nations." Then he brought up "manifest destiny," followed by references to the "Monroe doctrine," and more Buncombe about England, and then... he sat down, likely feeling he had significantly boosted his chances for the "tenancy of the White House."

I regretted much not being able to hear Mr. Everett speak, for I believe he is admitted on all hands to be the most eloquent and classical orator within the precincts of the senate at the present moment; but I was obliged to leave Washington before he addressed the assembly. The absence of all signs of approbation or disapprobation, while a senator is addressing the House, gives a coldness to the debate, and I should think must have a damping effect upon the enthusiasm of the speaker. The "Hear hears" and "cheers" of friends, and the "Oh ohs" or "laughter" of opponents, certainly give an air of much greater excitement to the scene, and act as an encouragement to the orator. But such exclamations are not allowed either in the Senate or the House of Representatives. The chamber of the latter is of course much larger than that of the Senators, and, as far as I can judge, a bad room to hear in. When the new wings are finished, they will move into one of them, and their present chamber is, I believe, to be a library. I had no opportunity of hearing any of the oratory of this house, as they were merely hustling a few money and minor bills through, previous to the inauguration, which closed their session. They also have each a desk and chair; but with their increasing numbers I fear that any room large enough to afford them such accommodation must be bad for speaking in.—Let us now turn to the great event of the day, i.e., the Inauguration.

I really wished I could hear Mr. Everett speak because, honestly, he’s considered the most eloquent and classical orator in the Senate right now. Unfortunately, I had to leave Washington before he spoke to the assembly. The lack of reactions, like applause or disapproval, while a senator is speaking, makes the debate feel cold, and I imagine it must dampen the speaker's enthusiasm. The "Hear hears" and cheers from supporters, and the "Oh ohs" or laughter from opponents definitely add more excitement to the scene and motivate the orator. But those kinds of reactions aren’t allowed in either the Senate or the House of Representatives. The House chamber is obviously much larger than the Senate's, and from what I can tell, it’s not a great place for hearing speeches. Once the new wings are finished, they’ll move into one of them, and their current chamber is supposed to become a library. I didn’t get a chance to hear any speeches from the House since they were just pushing through a few money and minor bills before the inauguration, which wrapped up their session. They also have desks and chairs, but with their growing numbers, I’m worried that any room big enough to accommodate all of them won’t be good for speaking in. Now, let’s move on to the main event of the day, i.e., the Inauguration.

The senators are all in their places; ministers of foreign Powers and their suites are seated on the row of benches under the gallery; the expectant masses are waiting outside; voices are suddenly hushed, and all eyes turned towards the door of the senate-chamber; the herald walks in, and says, "The President Elect of the United States." The chosen of his country appears with as little form or ceremony as a gentleman walking into an ordinary drawing-room. All rise as he enters.

The senators are all in their seats; foreign ministers and their entourages are sitting on the benches under the gallery; the anxious crowds are waiting outside; voices suddenly quiet down, and everyone’s eyes are fixated on the door of the senate chamber; the herald steps in and says, "The President Elect of the United States." The chosen leader enters with as little pomp or ceremony as a guy walking into a regular living room. Everyone stands as he comes in.

I watched the man of the day as he proceeded to his seat on the floor of the senate. There was neither pride in his eye nor nervousness in his step, but a calm and dignified composure, well fitted to his high position, as though gratified ambition were duly tempered by a deep sense of responsibility. The procession moved out in order to a platform in front of the Capitol, the late able president walking side by side with his untried successor, and apparently as calm in resigning office as his successor appeared to be in entering upon it. Of the inaugural speech I shall say nothing, as all who care to read it have done so long since. But one thing should always be remembered, and that is, that the popular candidates here are all compelled to "do a little Buncombe," and therefore, under the circumstances, I think it must be admitted there was as little as was possible. That speech tolled the knell, for the present at least, of the Whig party, and ushered in the reign of General Pierce and the Democrats.

I watched the man of the day as he made his way to his seat on the Senate floor. There was no pride in his eyes or nervousness in his steps, just a calm and dignified presence, perfectly suited to his high position, as if his fulfilled ambitions were balanced by a strong sense of responsibility. The procession moved orderly to a platform in front of the Capitol, with the former capable president walking alongside his untested successor, both appearing equally calm—one in handing over the office and the other in taking it on. I won’t comment on the inaugural speech, as everyone who cares to read it has done so long ago. However, one thing should always be noted: popular candidates are always expected to "do a little Buncombe," and given the situation, I think it's fair to say there wasn't much of it. That speech marked the end, at least for now, of the Whig party and the beginning of General Pierce's reign and the Democrats.

Since these lines were penned, the "chosen of the nation" has passed through his ordeal of four years' administration; and, whatever private virtues may have adorned his character, I imagine the unanimous voice of his countrymen would unhesitatingly declare, that so utterly inefficient a man never filled the presidential chair. He has been succeeded by Mr. Buchanan, who was well known as the accredited Minister to the Court of St. James's, and who also made himself ludicrously conspicuous as one of the famous Ostend manifesto party. However, his talents are undoubted, and his public career renders it probable that, warned by the failure of his predecessor, his presidency will reflect more credit upon the Republic than that of Mr. Pierce. Mr. B.'s inaugural address has been published in this country, and is, in its way, a contradictory curiosity. He urges, in diplomacy, "frankness and clearness;" while, to his fellow-citizens, he offers some very wily diplomatic sentences. Munroe doctrine and manifest destiny are not named; but they are shadowed forth in language worthy of a Talleyrand. First, he glories in his country having never extended its territory by the sword(?); he then proceeds to say—what everybody says in anticipation of conquest, annexation, or absorption—"Our past history forbids that, in future, we should acquire territory, unless this be sanctioned by the laws of justice and honour" (two very elastic laws among nations). "Acting on this principle, no nation will have a right to interfere, or to complain if, in the progress of events, we shall still further extend our possessions." Leaving these frank and clear sentences to the consideration of the reader, we return from the digression.

Since these lines were written, the "chosen of the nation" has completed his four-year term in office. Despite any private virtues he may have had, I'm sure the overwhelming sentiment of his fellow citizens would clearly state that no one as utterly ineffective as he has ever held the presidential position. He’s been succeeded by Mr. Buchanan, who was known as the accredited Minister to the Court of St. James's, and who also made himself absurdly noticeable as part of the famous Ostend manifesto group. However, his abilities are undeniable, and his public record suggests that, having learned from the failures of his predecessor, his presidency will bring more honor to the Republic than Mr. Pierce’s did. Mr. Buchanan's inaugural address has been published in this country and is, in its own way, a contradictory curiosity. He promotes “frankness and clarity” in diplomacy, while presenting some very clever diplomatic remarks to his fellow citizens. The Monroe Doctrine and Manifest Destiny aren’t mentioned, but they’re hinted at in language worthy of Talleyrand. First, he boasts that his country has never expanded its territory by force; then he states—what everyone says in anticipation of conquest, annexation, or absorption—“Our past history forbids that, in the future, we should acquire territory, unless this is sanctioned by the laws of justice and honor” (two very flexible laws among nations). “Based on this principle, no nation will have the right to interfere or complain if, as events unfold, we further extend our possessions.” Leaving these frank and clear statements for the reader to consider, we return from the digression.

The crowd outside was very orderly, but by no means so numerous as I had expected; I estimated them at 8000; but a friend who was with me, and well versed in such matters, calculated the numbers at nearly 10,000, but certainly, he said, not more. The penny Press, by way of doing honour to their new ruler, boldly fixed the numbers at 40,000—that was their bit of Buncombe. One cause, probably, of the crowd not being greater, was the drizzling snow, which doubtlessly induced many to be satisfied with seeing the procession pass along Pennsylvania Avenue.

The crowd outside was quite organized, but definitely not as large as I had expected; I estimated it to be around 8,000 people, but a friend who was with me and knows about these things thought there were close to 10,000, but definitely not more. The penny press, wanting to honor their new leader, boldly stated the number was 40,000—that was their bit of nonsense. One reason the crowd might not have been bigger was the light snow, which likely made many people content with just watching the procession go down Pennsylvania Avenue.

I cannot help remarking here, how little some of their eminent men know of England. A senator, of great and just reputation, came to me during the ceremony, and said, "There is one thing which must strike you as very remarkable, and that is, that we have no soldiers here to keep order upon an occasion of such political importance." He was evidently unaware that, not only was such the case invariably in England, but that soldiers are confined to barracks, or even removed during the excitement of elections. There is no doubt that the falsehoods and exaggerations with which the Press here teems, in matters referring to England, are sufficiently glaring to be almost self-confuting; but if they can so warp the mind of an enlightened senator, how is it to be wondered at that, among the masses, many suck in all such trash as if it were Gospel truth, and look upon England as little else than a land of despotism; but of that, more anon. The changing of presidents in this country resembles, practically speaking, the changing of a premier in England; but, thank Heaven! the changing of a premier in England does not involve the same changes as does the changing of a president here.

I can’t help but point out how little some of their prominent figures know about England. During the ceremony, a well-respected senator approached me and said, "There’s one thing that must strike you as very remarkable, and that’s that we don’t have soldiers here to maintain order during such an important political event." He seemed completely unaware that this is always the case in England, where soldiers are kept in barracks or even removed during the excitement of elections. There’s no doubt that the lies and exaggerations that fill the Press here about England are so blatant they almost disprove themselves; but if they can distort the views of an educated senator, it’s no surprise that many people swallow all that nonsense as if it's the Gospel truth, seeing England as little more than a land of tyranny. But more on that later. Changing presidents in this country is practically speaking like changing a premier in England; but thank goodness changing a premier in England doesn’t bring about the same upheaval as changing a president does here.

I believe it was General Jackson who first introduced the practice of a wholesale sweeping out of opponents from all situations, however small; and this bright idea has been religiously acted upon by all succeeding presidents. The smallest clerkships, twopenny-halfpenny postmasterships in unheard-of villages—all, all that can be dispensed with, must make way for the friends of the incomers to power. Fancy a new premier in England making a clean sweep of nine-tenths of the clerks, &c., at the Treasury, Foreign-office, Post-office, Custom-house, Dockyards, &c., &c. Conceive the jobbing such a system must lead to, not to mention the comparative inefficiency it must produce in the said departments, and the ridiculous labour it throws upon the dispensers of these gifts of place. The following quotation may be taken as a sample:—

I think it was General Jackson who first started the practice of completely removing opponents from all roles, no matter how minor; and this great idea has been strictly followed by all the presidents after him. Every little clerk position, tiny postmaster jobs in unknown villages—all of them must be cleared out to make room for the friends of the new leaders. Imagine a new prime minister in England cleaning house and getting rid of nine-tenths of the clerks, etc., at the Treasury, Foreign Office, Post Office, Customs House, Dockyards, etc., etc. Think about the favoritism such a system would create, not to mention the lack of efficiency it would cause in those departments, and the ridiculous workload it places on those handing out these jobs. The following quote might serve as an example:—

OUR CUSTOM-HOUSE—WHAT A HAUL.—The New Hampshire Patriot, in an

The article on proscription refers to the ruthless beheading of

the Democrats of our Custom-house, by Mr. Collector Maxwell:—

"Take the New York Custom-house as an example. There are 626 officers __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__."

there, not including workers; and it seems from the records that,

Since the Whigs took power, 427 removals have been made there.

And to illustrate the greed of the Whig candidates for the rewards, it

It only needs to be mentioned that, on the very day the collector was sworn in to

In his office, he completed forty-two removals. He did six before he was sworn in.

Thirty days after he started his duties, he was removed.

220 people; and, over the span of a few months, he had made such a

a clean sweep, leaving only sixty-two Democrats still in office, with

564 Whigs! A similar sweep was made in other customs houses; and it was so thorough

The "anti-proscription" measures implemented by the administration were carried out in the offices.

that a Democrat could hardly be found in an office that a Whig

could be found to take.

This is concerning, as the 564 Whigs are now subject to the kindness of __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

the new collector. Unfortunately, the Democrats are eager—hard shells and

soft shells—and charity starts at home. Over the next

this month, we can expect a significant migration from the customs office to __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

California and Australia. What a blessing for ousted officeholders.

that they can rely on the gold mines! Such is the wonderful

The way our helpful institutions operate is amazing! What a fantastic country!

As a proof of the excitement which these changes produce, I remember perfectly there being ten to one more fuss and telegraphing between Washington and New York, as to who should be collector at the latter port, than would exist between London and Paris if a revolution was in full swing at the latter. To this absurd system may no doubt be partly attributed the frequent irregularities of their inland postage; but it is an evil which, as far as I can judge from observation and conversation, will continue till, with an increasing population and increase of business, necessity re-establishes the old and better order of things. Political partisanship is so strong that nothing but imperative necessity can alter it.

As proof of the excitement these changes create, I clearly remember there being ten times more fuss and telegraphing between Washington and New York about who should be the collector at the latter port than there would be between London and Paris if a revolution were happening in Paris. This ridiculous system likely contributes to the frequent problems with their inland postage, but it’s an issue that, from what I can gather through observation and conversations, will persist until, with a growing population and increasing business, necessity brings back the old and better way of doing things. Political partisanship is so strong that only a pressing necessity can change it.

The cabmen here, as in every other place I ever visited, make strenuous efforts to do the new comers. They tried it on me; so, to show them how knowing I was, I quoted their legitimate fares. "Ah, sir," says Cabby, "that's very well; but, you see, we charges more at times like these." I replied, "You've no right to raise your charges; by what authority do you do it?" "Oh, sir, we meet together and agree what is the proper thing." "But," says I, "the authorities are the people to settle those things." "The authorities don't know nothing at all about it; we can manage our own matters better than they." And they all stoutly stuck to their own charges, the effect of which was that I scarcely saw a dozen cabs employed during the ten days I was there.

The cab drivers here, like in every other place I've been, try really hard to take advantage of newcomers. They attempted that with me too, so to show how savvy I was, I quoted their official fares. "Ah, sir," says the cab driver, "that's all well and good; but you see, we charge more at times like these." I replied, "You have no right to increase your prices; what gives you the authority to do that?" "Oh, sir, we get together and agree on what the right thing is." "But," I said, "it's the authorities who should decide those things." "The authorities don't know anything about it at all; we can handle our own business better than they can." And they all firmly stood by their rates, which meant I hardly saw more than a dozen cabs in use during the ten days I was there.

Nothing could exceed the crowd in the streets, in the hotels, and everywhere; the whole atmosphere was alive with the smoke of the fragrant weed, and all the hotels were afloat with the juice thereof. The city has repeatedly been called the City of Magnificent Distances; but anything so far behind its fellow cities cannot well be imagined. It sounds incredible—nevertheless, it is a fact—that, except from the Capitol to the "White House," there is not a street-light of any kind, or a watchman. I lost my way one evening, and wandered all over the town for two hours, without seeing light or guardian of any kind. I suppose this is intended as a proof of the honest and orderly conduct of the inhabitants, but I fear it must also be taken as a proof of their poverty or want of energy. Whatever the reason may be, it certainly is a reflection on the liberality of the Government, that the capital of this Great Union should be the worst paved, worst lit, and worst guarded in the whole Republic.

Nothing could compare to the crowd in the streets, in the hotels, and everywhere else; the whole place was filled with the smoke from the fragrant weed, and all the hotels were swamped with its residue. The city has often been called the City of Magnificent Distances, but it's hard to imagine anything that lags so far behind other cities. It seems unbelievable—yet it’s true—that, except for the stretch from the Capitol to the White House, there’s not a single streetlight or watchman. I got lost one night and wandered around town for two hours without seeing any light or security. I guess this is meant to show how honest and orderly the residents are, but I worry it also highlights their poverty or lack of initiative. Whatever the case, it certainly reflects poorly on the generosity of the Government that the capital of this Great Union should be the worst paved, worst lit, and worst guarded in the entire Republic.

The system of sweeping changes on the election of a new president tends materially to stop any increase of householders, the uncertain tenure of office making the employés prefer clustering in hotels and boarding-houses to entering on a short career of housekeeping, which will, of course, militate against any steady increase of the city, and thus diminish the tax-payers. There are several hotels, but they will not stand the least comparison with those in any of the leading towns of the Union. Like the hotels in London, they are crammed during the season—i.e., session—and during the rest of the year are comparatively empty, and consequently do not pay very well; but they are not the only establishments that make hay during the session; if report speaks truly, the bars and gambling-houses reap an immense harvest from the representatives of the people in both houses of congress.

The system of sweeping changes in how a new president is elected tends to seriously limit the increase of homeowners. The uncertain duration of their positions makes employees prefer staying in hotels and boarding houses instead of starting short-term households, which hurts the city's steady growth and reduces the number of taxpayers. There are several hotels, but they can't compare at all to those in the leading cities in the country. Like hotels in London, they are packed during the season—meaning the legislative session—and are fairly empty the rest of the year, so they don’t do very well financially. However, they aren’t the only places benefiting during the session; if rumors are true, bars and gambling houses make a huge profit from the representatives of the people in both houses of Congress.

I amused myself here, as I often had done in other towns, by taking a cigar in some decent-looking shop, and then having a chat with the owner. On this occasion the subject of conversation was drinking in the States. He said, in reply to a question I put to him, "Sir, a gentleman must live a long time in the country before he can form the slightest idea of the frightful extent to which drinking is carried, even by the decently educated and well-to-do classes. I do not say that nine-tenths of the people die drunk, but I firmly believe that with that proportion death has been very materially hastened from perpetual drinks. It is one of the greatest curses of this country, and I cannot say that I believe it to be on the decrease." One reason, doubtless, why it is so pernicious, is the constant habit of drinking before breakfast. That he was correct in his per-centage, I do not pretend to say; but I certainly have seen enough of the practice to feel sure it must have a most pernicious effect on very many. To what extent it is carried on by the lowest classes I had no opportunity of judging.

I entertained myself here, as I often did in other towns, by grabbing a cigar in a nice-looking shop and chatting with the owner. This time, the topic of our conversation was drinking in the States. In response to a question I asked him, he said, "Sir, a gentleman has to live in this country for a long time before he can even begin to understand the terrible extent of drinking, even among the educated and wealthy classes. I won't say that nine out of ten people die drunk, but I genuinely believe that a significant number of deaths have been accelerated by constant drinking. It’s one of the biggest problems in this country, and I can't say that I think it’s getting any better." One reason it’s so harmful is likely the common habit of drinking before breakfast. I won't claim his percentage is accurate, but I've definitely seen enough of this behavior to be sure it must have a seriously harmful impact on many people. I had no way of judging how widespread it is among the lower classes.

The following observations, however, made by so high an authority as Mr. Everett, must be admitted as a convincing proof that education has not been able to cope effectually with drunkenness. Speaking of ardent spirits, he says:—

The following observations, however, made by such a respected authority as Mr. Everett, must be accepted as strong evidence that education has not been able to effectively address drunkenness. Speaking of alcoholic beverages, he says:—

"What has it accomplished in ten years in the United States? First, it has

cost the nation a direct expense of 120,000,000l. Secondly, it has

cost the nation an indirect expense of 120,000,000l. Thirdly, it has

destroyed 300,000 lives. Fourthly, it has sent 100,000 children to the

poorhouse. Fifth, it has assigned at least 150,000 people to

jails and prisons. Sixthly, it has created at least a thousand

maniacs. Additionally, it has encouraged the act of at least __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

fifteen hundred murders. Eighthly, it has caused 2000 people to

commit suicide. Ninthly, it has burned or otherwise destroyed property.

to the sum of 2,000,000l. Tenth, it has created 200,000 widows,

and 1,000,000 orphan children.

When I turn from the contemplation of this sad picture, and think how many fall victims to the same vice in my own country, I cannot help feeling that the "myriad-minded poet" wrote the following lines as an especial warning and legacy to the Anglo-Saxon and the Celt:—

When I look away from this sad image and consider how many people in my own country suffer from the same vice, I can't help but think that the "myriad-minded poet" wrote these lines as a specific warning and legacy to the Anglo-Saxon and the Celt:—

"Oh, that people would put an enemy in their mouths to take away their

Brains! That we should celebrate with joy, enjoyment, excitement, and appreciation,

transform ourselves into beasts!

I was very sorry time did not admit of my witnessing one of the new president's levees, as I much wished to see the olla podrida of attendants. It must be a quaint scene; the hack-cabman who drives you to the door will get a boy to look after his shay, and go in with you; tag-rag and bob-tail, and all their family, go in precisely as they like; neither soap nor brush is a necessary prelude. By late accounts from America, it appears that at Mr. Pierce's last levee a gentleman charged another with picking his pocket: the latter went next day with a friend to explain the mistake, which the former refusing to accept, he was struck by the accused, and, in return, shot him dead on the spot. A pleasant state of society for the metropolis of a civilized community! How changed since the days of Washington and knee-breeches! It should however be mentioned as highly creditable to the masses, that they rarely take advantage of their rights. The building is the size of a moderately wealthy country gentleman's house in England, and has one or two fine reception-rooms; between it and the water a monument is being raised to Washington. I fear it will be a sad failure; the main shaft or column suggests the idea of a semaphore station, round the base whereof the goodly things of sculpture are to be clustered. As far as I could glean from conversation with Americans, they seem themselves to anticipate anything but success.

I was really sorry I couldn't witness one of the new president's events, as I really wanted to see the mix of people who attend. It must be quite a scene; the taxi driver who takes you to the door will get a kid to watch his cab and come inside with you; all sorts of folks come in however they please; there's no need for soap or a comb before entering. According to recent reports from America, it seems that at Mr. Pierce's last event, one man accused another of pickpocketing him: the guy, the next day, came with a friend to clear things up, but the accuser refused to accept his explanation, so the accused struck him, and in retaliation, shot him dead on the spot. What a lovely situation for the capital of a civilized society! How things have changed since the days of Washington and knee-breeches! However, it should be noted that it's commendable that the general public rarely abuses their rights. The building is about the size of a moderately wealthy country house in England and has one or two nice reception rooms; there's a monument being built to Washington between it and the water. I'm worried it will turn out poorly; the main column looks like a semaphore station, with sculptures clustered around the base. From what I gathered in conversations with Americans, they seem to expect anything but success.

The finest buildings here are the Capitol, Patent-office, and Post-office. Of these the Patent-office, which is modelled after the Parthenon, is the only one that has any pretensions to architecture. I fear the Anglo-Saxon of these later days, whether in the old country or here, is destined to leave no solid traces of architectural taste—vide National Gallery, London, and Post-office, Washington.

The best buildings here are the Capitol, the Patent Office, and the Post Office. Among these, the Patent Office, designed after the Parthenon, is the only one that really claims to be architectural. I worry that the Anglo-Saxon of today, whether in the old country or here, is set to leave no lasting impression of architectural style—see the National Gallery in London and the Post Office in Washington.

Having seen the lions of Washington, and enjoyed the hospitalities of our able and agreeable minister, I again trusted myself to the iron horse, and started for Baltimore. During my residence in Washington, I had revelled latterly in the comfort of a lodging free from the horrors of American inns. Profiting by this experience, I had applied to a friend at Baltimore to engage me rooms in some quiet place there; by this precaution I got into Guy's, in Monument-square. He keeps a restaurant, but has a few beds for friends or old customers. I found myself most comfortably housed, and the living of the cleanest and the best; besides which, my kind friends gave me the entrée of the Club, which was almost next door. The hospitalities of which I had enjoyed a foretaste in November last, now thickened upon me, and though the season of Lent had put a stop to large and general parties, enough was still left to make my stay very agreeable.

Having seen the lions of Washington and enjoyed the hospitality of our capable and friendly minister, I once again entrusted myself to the iron horse and set off for Baltimore. During my time in Washington, I had recently relished the comfort of staying in a place free from the horrors of American inns. Taking advantage of this experience, I had asked a friend in Baltimore to reserve me a room in some quiet spot; because of this, I ended up at Guy's in Monument Square. He runs a restaurant but also has a few beds for friends or regular customers. I found myself very comfortably situated, with the cleanest and best food; in addition, my kind friends gave me access to the Club, which was almost next door. The hospitality I had a taste of last November now came in abundance, and although the Lenten season had put a halt to large gatherings, there was still enough going on to make my stay very enjoyable.

The town is beautifully situated on undulating ground, commanding a lovely view of the hay; the streets are of a rational breadth, the town is rapidly increasing, the new buildings are all large and airy, and everything indicates prosperity. The cuisine of Baltimore has a very high, and, as far as I can judge, a very just reputation; not merely Maxwell Point canvas-back ducks, but the famous Terrapin also, lend their aid to the enjoyment of the inner man. In fact, so famous is the Terrapin, that a wicked wag detailed to me an account of a highly improper scene which he said took place once in the Episcopal Church here, viz., a gentleman who had a powerful voice and generally led the responses, had his heart and mind so full of the luscious little animal, that by a sad fatality he substituted "Terrapin" for "Seraphin" in the response; and so far was any one from remarking it, that the whole congregation repeated the mistake after him. The curly twinkle in the eye with which my friend told me the story, leaves an impression in my mind that it may be an exaggeration.

The town is beautifully positioned on rolling hills, offering a lovely view of the fields; the streets are a reasonable width, the town is growing quickly, the new buildings are all large and airy, and everything shows signs of prosperity. The food in Baltimore has a very good, and as far as I can tell, a well-deserved reputation; not only the Maxwell Point canvas-back ducks, but also the famous Terrapin contribute to the enjoyment of a good meal. In fact, the Terrapin is so well-known that a mischievous friend shared a story with me about an inappropriate incident that supposedly happened in the Episcopal Church here. A gentleman with a strong voice who usually led the responses was so distracted by thoughts of that delicious little creature that he accidentally said "Terrapin" instead of "Seraphin" during the response. Far from anyone noticing, the entire congregation followed his lead and repeated the mistake. The playful glint in my friend's eye when he told the story makes me think it might be an exaggeration.

While here, I observed a play-bill with "The White Slave of England" printed on it, evidently intended as a set-off against the dramatizing of "Uncle Tom" in London, at some of our penny theatres. Of course I went to see it, and never laughed more in all my life.

While I was there, I saw a playbill with "The White Slave of England" on it, clearly meant to counter the dramatization of "Uncle Tom" at some of our penny theaters in London. Naturally, I went to check it out, and I’ve never laughed harder in my life.

The theatre was about the size of a six-stalled stable, and full of rowdies, &c.—no ladies; our party had a private-box. The tragedy opens by revealing the under-ground of a coal-pit in England, where is seen a fainting girl, &c. &c.: the girl is, of course, well licked by a driver; an explosion takes place; dead and dying bodies are heaped together, the driver says, "D---- 'em, let 'em lie; we'll get plenty more from the poor-house." These mines belong to a Lord Overstone; an American arrives with a negro servant, whom he leaves to seek his own amusement. He then calls on Lord Overstone, and obtains permission to visit the mines; there he finds the girl alluded to above all but dying, and, of course, rescues her. In the meantime, the nigger calls on Lord Overstone as a foreign prince, is immensely fêted, the Duchess of Southernblack and her friend Lady Cunning are invited to meet his Royal Highness; the rescued girl is claimed as a slave by Lord Overstone; philanthropic Jonathan, after some difficulty, succeeds in keeping her, having first ordered Lord Overstone's servants to the right-about with all the swagger of a northern negro-driver. It appears that Jonathan was formerly a boy in the mines himself, and had conceived an affection for this girl. Lord Overstone finds out that Jonathan has papers requisite for him to prove his right to his property; he starts with his family for America, to visit him on his plantation. There the niggers exhibit a paradise such as never was; nearly the first person is his Royal Highness the nigger servant. Lady Overstone faints when he comes up to shake hands. Business proceeds; Lord Overstone bullies,—Jonathan is the milk of mildness. At last it turns out the girl is a daughter of Lord Overstone, and that the Yankee is the owner by right of Lord Overstone's property. He delivers a Buncombe speech, resigning his rights, and enlarging on the higher privilege of being in the land of true freedom—a slave plantation. The audience scream frantically, Lord and Lady Overstone go back humbled, and the curtain falls on one of the most absurd farces I ever saw; not the least absurd part being Jonathan refusing to take possession of his inheritance of 17,000l. a-year. Truly, "Diogenes in his tub" is nothing to "Jonathan in his sugar-cask."

The theater was about the size of a six-stall stable and packed with rowdy people—no ladies; our group had a private box. The tragedy begins by showing the underground of a coal mine in England, where a fainting girl is seen, among other things. The girl is, of course, roughly handled by a driver; an explosion occurs; dead and dying bodies are piled together, and the driver says, "D---- 'em, let 'em lie; we'll get plenty more from the poorhouse." These mines belong to a Lord Overstone; an American arrives with a Black servant, whom he leaves to have his own fun. He then visits Lord Overstone and gets permission to inspect the mines; there he finds the girl mentioned earlier, almost dying, and of course rescues her. Meanwhile, the servant visits Lord Overstone as a foreign prince, is greatly celebrated, and the Duchess of Southernblack and her friend Lady Cunning are invited to meet His Royal Highness; the rescued girl is claimed as a slave by Lord Overstone; philanthropic Jonathan, after some trouble, manages to keep her, having first ordered Lord Overstone's servants to leave with all the swagger of a northern Black driver. It turns out Jonathan was once a boy in the mines himself and had developed feelings for this girl. Lord Overstone discovers that Jonathan has the necessary documents to prove his claim to his property; he sets off with his family for America to visit him on his plantation. There, the servants showcase a paradise like none other; the first person he meets is his Royal Highness, the servant. Lady Overstone faints when he approaches to shake her hand. Business proceeds; Lord Overstone is overbearing—Jonathan is the picture of gentleness. Eventually, it is revealed that the girl is Lord Overstone's daughter, and the Yankee is the rightful owner of Lord Overstone's property. He gives a meaningless speech, renouncing his rights, while expounding on the greater privilege of being in the land of true freedom—a slave plantation. The audience screams wildly, Lord and Lady Overstone leave humbled, and the curtain falls on one of the most ridiculous farces I've ever seen; not the least ridiculous part being Jonathan refusing to claim his inheritance of £17,000 a year. Truly, "Diogenes in his tub" is nothing compared to "Jonathan in his sugar barrel."

The population of Maryland has increased in whites and free negroes, and decreased in slaves, between the years 1800 and 1852, in the following manner:—

The population of Maryland has grown in white people and free Black individuals, while the number of enslaved people has decreased between the years 1800 and 1852, as follows:—

           Whites.  Free Black People.  Enslaved People.
    1800   216,000      8,000      103,000
    1852   500,000     74,008       90,000.

The state has nearly a thousand educational establishments; and there are sixty daily and weekly papers for the instruction of the community. Baltimore has a population of 140,000 whites, 25,000 free blacks, 3000 slaves. Among this population are nearly 30,000 Germans and 20,000 Irish. The value of the industrial establishments of the city is estimated at considerably above 4,000,000l. From the above, I leave the reader to judge of its prosperity.

The state has almost a thousand schools, and there are sixty daily and weekly newspapers for educating the community. Baltimore has a population of 140,000 white residents, 25,000 free Black individuals, and 3,000 enslaved people. Among this population are nearly 30,000 Germans and 20,000 Irish. The value of the city's industrial businesses is estimated to be well over 4,000,000l. Based on this information, I'll let the reader assess its prosperity.

The people in Baltimore who enjoy the widest—if not the the most enviable—reputation, are the fire companies. They are all volunteer, and their engines are admirable. They are all jealous as Kilkenny cats of one another, and when they come together, they scarcely ever lose an opportunity of getting up a bloody fight. They are even accused of doing occasionally a little bit of arson, so as to get the chance of a row. The people composing the companies are almost entirely rowdies, and apparently of any age above sixteen: when extinguishing fires, they exhibit a courage and reckless daring that cannot be surpassed, and they are never so happy as when the excitement of danger is at its highest. Their numbers are so great, that they materially affect the elections of all candidates for city offices; the style of persons chosen, may hence be easily guessed. The cup of confusion is fast filling up; and unless some knowing hands can make a hole in the bottom and drain off the dregs, the overflow will be frightful.

The people in Baltimore who have the widest—if not the most envied—reputation are the fire companies. They are all volunteers, and their engines are impressive. They’re as competitive as Kilkenny cats with each other, and when they gather, they rarely miss a chance to start a fight. They are even accused of committing a bit of arson now and then just to have the opportunity for some action. The members of these companies are mostly rowdy, and seem to be any age above sixteen: when putting out fires, they show a bravery and reckless daring that’s unmatched, and they’re never happier than when the excitement of danger is at its peak. Their numbers are so large that they significantly influence the elections for all city offices; the type of people selected can be easily guessed. The cup of confusion is quickly filling up; and unless some savvy individuals can make a hole in the bottom and drain off the excess, the overflow will be terrifying.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

I had had the good fortune to pick up an agreeable companion on board the "Isabel"—the brother of one of our most distinguished members of the House of Commons—who, like myself, had been visiting Cuba, and was hastening to Washington, to be present at the inauguration of the President Elect, and with him I spent many very pleasant days.



CHAPTER XIV.

Philadelphia and Richmond.




Having spent a very pleasant time at Baltimore, I took rail for Philadelphia, the city of "loving brotherhood," being provided with letters to several most amiable families in that town. I took up my abode at Parkinson's—a restaurant in Chestnut-street—where I found the people very civil and the house very clean; but I saw little of the inside of the house, except at bed and breakfast time. The hospitality for which this city is proverbial soon made me as much at home as if I had been a resident there all my life. Dinner-party upon dinner-party succeeded each other like waves of the ocean; the tables groaned under precious vintages of Madeira, dating back all but to the Flood. I have never before or since tasted such delicious wine, and in such profusion, and everybody stuck to it with such leech-like tenacity. On one occasion, having sat down to dinner at two o'clock, I found myself getting up from table half an hour after midnight, and quite as fresh as when I had sat down. There was no possibility of leaving the hospitable old General's mahogany.[AD] One kind friend, Mr. C.H. Fisher, insisted that I must make his house my hotel, either he or his wife were always at dinner at four o'clock, and my cover was always laid. The society of his amiable lady and himself made it too tempting an offer to refuse, and I need scarcely say, it added much to the pleasure of my stay in Philadelphia. The same kind friend had also a seat for me always in his box at the opera, where that most charming and lady-like of actresses, the Countess Rossi,[AE] with her sweet voice, was gushing forth soft melody to crammed houses. On every side I met nothing but kindness. Happening one day at dinner to mention incidentally, that I thought the butter unworthy of the reputation of Philadelphia—for it professes to stand pre-eminent in dairy produce—two ladies present exclaimed, "Well!" and accompanied the expression by a look of active benevolence. The next morning, as I was sitting down to breakfast, a plate arrived from each of the rivals in kindness; the dew of the morning was on the green leaf, and underneath, such butter as my mouth waters at the remembrance of, and thus it continued during my whole stay. The club doors, with all its conveniences—and to a solitary stranger they are very great—were thrown open to me: in short, my friends left me nothing to wish, except that my time had permitted me a longer enjoyment of their hospitalities.

After a wonderful time in Baltimore, I took a train to Philadelphia, the city known for its "brotherly love," with letters of introduction to several lovely families there. I stayed at Parkinson's, a restaurant on Chestnut Street, where I found the staff friendly and the place very clean; however, I hardly saw the inside of the restaurant except for breakfast and dinner. The city's renowned hospitality quickly made me feel right at home, as if I had lived there my whole life. Dinner parties came one after another like ocean waves; the tables were filled with fine Madeira wine, some bottles nearly as old as time itself. I've never tasted such delicious wine before or since, and everyone clung to it with surprising determination. One time, after sitting down for dinner at two o'clock, I found myself getting up from the table half an hour after midnight, feeling just as refreshed as when I started. There was no way I could leave the generous old General's mahogany table. One kind friend, Mr. C.H. Fisher, insisted that I make his home my hotel; either he or his wife was always having dinner at four o'clock, and they always set a place for me. The company of his lovely wife and himself was too inviting to pass up, and it greatly enhanced my stay in Philadelphia. This same generous friend always saved me a seat in his box at the opera, where the charming and graceful Countess Rossi, with her sweet voice, delighted packed audiences. Everywhere I went, I encountered nothing but kindness. One day at dinner, I casually mentioned that I thought the butter didn't live up to Philadelphia's famous dairy reputation. Two ladies at the table gasped and gave me looks full of concern. The next morning, as I was sitting down for breakfast, plates from each of the kind rivals arrived; the morning dew sparkled on the green leaves, and underneath were the most delicious butter I can still remember. This kindness continued throughout my entire stay. The club doors, with all their conveniences—which are considerable for a solitary traveler—were wide open to me. In short, my friends gave me everything I could wish for, except that I wished I had more time to enjoy their hospitality.

The streets of Philadelphia, which run north and south from the Schuylkill to the Delaware, are named after the trees, a row whereof grow on each side; but whether from a poetic spirit, or to aid the memory, some of the names are changed, that the following couplet, embracing the eight principal ones, may form a handy guide to the stranger or the resident:—

The streets of Philadelphia run north and south from the Schuylkill to the Delaware and are named after trees that line each side. However, whether out of poetic inspiration or to help with memory, some names have been altered so that the following couplet, which includes the eight main ones, can serve as a quick reference for visitors or locals:—

"Chestnut, walnut, spruce, and pine,"

"Market, arch, race, and vine."

Mulberry, and sassafras, and juniper, would have dished the poetry. The cross-streets are all called by numbers; thus any domicile is readily found. The principal traverse street is an exception, being called "Broad;" it looks its name well, and extends beyond the town into the country: strange as it may seem to those who associate stiff white bonnets, stiff coat-collars, and broad-brimmed hats, with Philadelphia, on the extremity of this street every Sunday afternoon, all the famous trotters may be seen dashing along at three-minute pace. The country round about is pretty and undulating, and the better-to-do inhabitants of Philadelphia have very snug little country places, in which they chiefly reside during the summer, and to which, at other seasons, they often adjourn upon the Saturday, to enjoy the quiet of Sunday in the country.

Mulberry, sassafras, and juniper would have added a poetic touch. The cross streets are all numbered, making it easy to find any house. The main street is different; it’s called "Broad," which suits it well, as it stretches beyond the town into the countryside. Surprisingly, for those who think of Philadelphia as all stiff white bonnets, stiff coat collars, and wide-brimmed hats, every Sunday afternoon, you'll see all the famous racehorses speeding down this street at a three-minute pace. The surrounding countryside is lovely and hilly, and the well-off residents of Philadelphia have cozy little country homes where they mostly stay during the summer. During other seasons, they often head there on Saturdays to enjoy a peaceful Sunday in the country.

One of the first objects of interest I went to visit was the Mint, the labours of which are of course immensely increased since the working of the Californian mines. Men are coming in every day with gold in greater or lesser quantities; it is first assayed, and the per-centage for this work being deducted, the value is paid in coin to the owner. While I was there, I saw a wiry-looking fellow arrive, in bright hat and brighter satin waistcoat, with a beard as bushy as an Indian jungle, and as red as the furnace into which his precious burden was to be thrown. Two small leather bags were carefully taken out of a waist-belt, their contents emptied into a tin can, a number placed in the can, and a corresponding number given him—no words spoken: in two days he would return, and, producing his number, receive value in coin. The dust would all have gone into a good-sized coffee-cup. I asked the officer about the value. "400l., sir." He had left a New England state some eight months previous, and was going home to invest in land.

One of the first places I visited was the Mint, which has obviously been really busy since the California gold rush. Men come in every day with gold in various amounts; it’s first assessed, and after taking out a fee for this process, the value is paid in coins to the owner. While I was there, I saw a thin guy arrive, wearing a flashy hat and an even flashier satin vest, with a bushy beard that looked like an overgrown jungle and as red as the furnace where his precious load would be processed. He carefully took out two small leather bags from his waistbelt, dumped their contents into a tin can, got a number on the can, and received a matching number in return—no words were exchanged. He would come back in two days, present his number, and get paid in coins. The dust would have fit into a decent-sized coffee cup. I asked the officer about the value. "400l, sir." He had left a New England state about eight months ago and was heading home to buy some land.

What strikes a stranger most on entering the Mint, is the absence of all extra defence round it; the building appears as open as any London house. The process is, of course, essentially the same as elsewhere; but I was astonished when the director told me that the parties employed in the establishment are never searched on leaving, though the value of hundreds of thousands of dollars is daily passing through their hands in every shape. The water in which the workmen wash their hands runs into a tank below, and from this water, value to the amount of from 60l. to 80l. is extracted annually. The sweepings, &c., after the most careful sifting, are packed in casks and sold—chiefly, I believe, to European Jews—for 4000l. annually. The only peculiarity in the Philadelphian Mint is a frame-work for counting the number of pieces coined, by which ingenious contrivance—rendered necessary by Californian pressure—one man does the work of from twenty to thirty. The operation of weighing the several pieces of coin being of a delicate nature, it is confided to the hands of the fair sex, who occupy a room to themselves, where each daughter of Eve sits with the gravity of a Chancellor opposite a delicate pair of scales. Most parts of the establishment are open to the public from ten till two, and they are only excluded from those portions of the building where intrusion would impede the operations in progress.

What stands out to a visitor upon entering the Mint is the lack of any additional security around it; the building feels as open as any house in London. The process here is essentially the same as in other places; however, I was surprised when the director told me that the people working in the facility are never searched when they leave, even though hundreds of thousands of dollars change hands daily in various forms. The water that the workers use to wash their hands drains into a tank below, and from this water, they extract value amounting to between 60l and 80l every year. The sweepings and so on, after thorough sifting, are packed into barrels and sold—mostly, I believe, to European Jews—for 4000l a year. The only unique feature of the Philadelphia Mint is a framework for counting the number of coins minted, which is an ingenious device—made necessary by the demand from California—that allows one person to do the work of twenty to thirty. Since weighing the various coins is a delicate task, it is entrusted to women, who have their own room where each woman sits with the seriousness of a Chancellor facing a delicate pair of scales. Most areas of the facility are open to the public from ten to two, and they are only restricted from those parts of the building where their presence would disrupt ongoing operations.

This city, like most others in America, is liberally supplied with water. Magnificent basins are built in a natural mound at Fairmount, nearly opposite an old family mansion of the Barings, and the water is forced up into these basins from the river by powerful water-wheels, worked by the said river, which is dammed up for the purpose of obtaining sufficient fall, as the stream is sometimes very low.

This city, like many others in America, has plenty of water. Impressive basins are constructed on a natural hill at Fairmount, almost across from an old family home of the Barings, and the water is pumped into these basins from the river by strong water wheels powered by the river itself, which is dammed to create enough drop, as the flow can sometimes be quite low.

Perhaps the most interesting, and certainly the most imposing sight in the neighbourhood of Philadelphia, is "The Gerard College." So singular and successful a career as that of the founder deserves a slight record.

Perhaps the most fascinating, and definitely the most striking sight in the area around Philadelphia, is "The Gerard College." Such a unique and accomplished life as that of the founder deserves a brief account.

Stephen Gerard was born of French parents, at Bordeaux, the 21st of May, 1750, and his home—owing to his mother's place having soon been filled by a step-mother—appears to have left no pleasant reminiscences. At fourteen years of age he took to the sea. Subsequently, as master and part owner of a small vessel, he arrived, in the year 1777, at Philadelphia for the first time, and commenced business as a merchant; but it appears that in 1786, he took command of one of his own vessels, leaving the management of his mercantile house to his brother. Returning in 1788, he dissolved partnership with his brother, and bade a final adieu to the sea. In the year 1793, the yellow fever raged with fury at Philadelphia; as the ravage increased, the people fled aghast. A hospital was organized at Bush Hill, in the neighbourhood, but all was confusion, for none could be found to face the dreaded enemy, till Stephen Gerard and Peter Helm boldly volunteered their services at the risk of their lives. Stephen Gerard was married, but his wife was consigned to an asylum in 1790, after various ineffectual efforts for her cure; there she remained till her death, in 1815. His mercantile pursuits prospered in every direction, and he soon became one of the most wealthy and influential men in the community; he was possessed of a vigorous constitution, and was extremely regular and abstemious in his habits. In 1830 he was knocked down by a passing vehicle as he was crossing the street; by this accident he was severely injured in the head, from which he was slowly recovering, when, in 1831, he was seized with violent influenza, and ultimately pneumonia, of which he died, the 26th of December, aged eighty-one.

Stephen Gerard was born to French parents in Bordeaux on May 21, 1750. His home life—since his mother's role was quickly taken over by a stepmother—didn’t seem to have any pleasant memories. At the age of fourteen, he went to sea. Later, as the captain and part owner of a small ship, he arrived in Philadelphia for the first time in 1777 and started a business as a merchant. However, in 1786, he took command of one of his own ships, leaving his brother in charge of the business. After returning in 1788, he ended his partnership with his brother and said a final goodbye to the sea. In 1793, yellow fever broke out fiercely in Philadelphia; as the outbreak worsened, people fled in panic. A hospital was set up at Bush Hill nearby, but it was chaos, as no one would confront the feared illness, until Stephen Gerard and Peter Helm courageously volunteered their services, risking their lives. Stephen Gerard was married, but his wife was placed in an asylum in 1790 after several unsuccessful attempts to treat her; she remained there until her death in 1815. His commercial ventures thrived in every direction, and he soon became one of the wealthiest and most influential men in the community. He had a strong constitution and was very disciplined in his habits. In 1830, a passing vehicle struck him while he was crossing the street, causing severe injuries to his head. He was slowly recovering when, in 1831, he contracted a severe case of influenza, which ultimately led to pneumonia, and he died on December 26, at age eighty-one.

His character appears to have been a curious compound. The assiduity with which he amassed wealth, coupled with his abstemious habits, and his old knee-breeches patched all over—and still to be seen in the college—strongly bespoke the miser; while his contributions to public works, and his liberal transactions in money matters, led to an opposite conclusion; and from his noble conduct during the yellow fever it is reasonable to infer he was a humane man. I do not wish to judge people uncharitably, but, I must say, I can allow but little credit to a man who legacies the bulk of his fortune away from his relations when he can no longer enjoy it himself. Mr. Gerard had very many relatives; let us see how he provided for them. The résumé of his will may be thus stated: he died worth 1,500,000l., and thus disposes of it:—

His character seems to be a strange mix. The way he collected wealth, combined with his frugal lifestyle and his old, patched knee-breeches—which are still visible at the college—really points to him being a miser. On the other hand, his donations to public projects and his generous dealings with money suggest a different story, and his noble actions during the yellow fever imply he was a compassionate person. I don't want to judge people unfairly, but I have to say that I can't give much credit to someone who leaves the majority of his fortune to others when he can no longer enjoy it himself. Mr. Gerard had many relatives; let’s see how he took care of them. The résumé of his will can be summarized like this: he died worth 1,500,000l., and here’s how he distributed it:—

    Erection and endowment of college        £400,000  
    Different institutions of charity          23,200  
    To his relatives and next of kin           28,000  
    City of Philadelphia, for improvements    100,000  
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, for  
      internal improvements                    60,000  
    Various friends, etc.                      13,000  

The residue left to the city of Philadelphia, for improvement and maintenance of his college, the establishment of better police, and to improve the city and diminish taxation. Thus, out of a fortune of one million and a half, he leaves his relatives 28,000l. Charity, in this instance, can scarcely be said to have begun at home.

The leftover funds designated for the city of Philadelphia will be used to enhance and maintain his college, establish better law enforcement, improve the city, and reduce taxes. Therefore, from a fortune of one and a half million, he leaves his relatives £28,000. In this case, it's hard to say that charity truly began at home.

A certain increase of property to the amount of 60,000l. having taken place since the date of his will, a suit was instituted by the heirs-at-law to recover the same; in which, I am happy to say, they were successful.

A certain increase in property amounting to £60,000 has occurred since the date of his will, leading to a lawsuit by the heirs-at-law to recover it; I'm pleased to say they were successful.

Perhaps one of the most extraordinary clauses in his will is the following, viz.:—

Perhaps one of the most remarkable clauses in his will is the following:—

"I enjoin and require that no ecclesiastic, missionary, or Minister of any sect whatsoever, shall ever hold or exercise any station or duty whatever in the said college; nor shall any such person ever be admitted for any purpose, or as a visitor, within the premises appropriated to the purposes of the said college."

"I require that no church official, missionary, or minister from any denomination shall hold or perform any role or duty in the college; nor shall any of these individuals be allowed on the college premises for any reason, including as a visitor."

The general design of the college is taken from the Madeleine. Thirty-four columns surround it, each column six feet in diameter and fifty feet high, made of marble, and weighing 103 tons, and costing when placed 2600l. Some idea of the massiveness of the building may be formed from the fact that, measuring 111 feet by 169 feet, and 59 of height, the weight of material employed is estimated at 76,594-1/2 tons. The effect of the whole is grand and graceful; and although as an orphan asylum much money has been needlessly turned from its charitable uses, as a building it does credit to the architect and all employed upon it, and is, beyond all comparison, the best specimen of architecture I have seen in the States.

The overall design of the college is inspired by the Madeleine. It’s surrounded by thirty-four columns, each six feet in diameter and fifty feet tall, made of marble, weighing 103 tons, and costing 2600l when installed. You can get a sense of the building’s massive scale from its dimensions: 111 feet by 169 feet, and 59 feet high, with an estimated weight of 76,594.5 tons of materials used. The overall effect is grand and elegant; even though a lot of money has been wasted that could have gone to its charitable missions as an orphanage, the building is a testament to the architect and everyone involved in its construction, and it's hands down the best example of architecture I've seen in the States.

Gerard College, Philadelphia

Gerard College, Philadelphia

Gerard College, Philadelphia

Gerard College, Philly

The number of orphans receiving instruction is three hundred and one; they are cleanly and comfortably lodged, and well-boarded; their ages average from ten to fourteen and a half, and the upper classes of the school are taught conic sections, geometry, chemistry, natural philosophy, navigation, astronomy, mechanics, physical geography, &c.

The number of orphans receiving education is three hundred and one; they are kept in clean and comfortable accommodations, and well-fed; their ages range from ten to fourteen and a half, and the higher grades of the school study conic sections, geometry, chemistry, natural philosophy, navigation, astronomy, mechanics, physical geography, etc.

While in the school vein, I visited one appropriated to four hundred free negroes, whom I found of all ages, from five to fifty, males and females being kept separate. The master told me that he found the boys tolerably sharp, but very cunning, and always finding some excuse for irregular attendance. The mistress said she found the girls very docile, and the parents very anxious, but too soon satisfied with the first stages of progress. The patience and pains I saw one of the teachers exhibiting in the process of enlightening the little woolly heads was most creditable.

While at the school, I visited one that served four hundred free Black individuals. I found students of all ages, from five to fifty, with boys and girls kept separate. The headmaster told me that the boys were fairly bright but quite sly, always coming up with excuses for missing school. The headmistress said the girls were very obedient, and the parents were eager but too quickly satisfied with early progress. I was impressed by the patience and effort one of the teachers showed in helping the young students learn.

Having finished the negro school, I got a letter to the principal of the High School, Professor Hart, by whom I was kindly shown over that admirable institution, which is also free; but, before proceeding to any observations on the High School, it may be interesting to know something of the entire provision for instruction which exists in the city and county of Philadelphia. The number of schools is 256, teachers 727, scholars 45,383. The teachers are principally females—646; of scholars, the males rather preponderate. The annual expense of these establishments is 66,500l., and the average cost of each pupil is 26s. No pupil can be admitted into the High School without producing satisfactory testimonials from the inferior schools, as well as passing the requisite examination; the consequence of this arrangement is a vast improvement in the inferior schools, as bad conduct there would effectually bar their entry to the High School. The average age of entry is fourteen, and a lad is required to stay five years before he can take his degree as Master of Arts, one indispensable requisite for which is moral character. The school numbers about 500 of all kinds and positions in society, from the hopes of the tinsmith to the heir of the toga'd judge.

Having finished attending the Black school, I received a letter to the principal of the High School, Professor Hart, who kindly showed me around that impressive institution, which is also free. However, before making any comments about the High School, it might be interesting to learn about the overall educational options available in the city and county of Philadelphia. There are 256 schools, with 727 teachers and 45,383 students. Most of the teachers are female—646; among the students, there are more boys than girls. The annual cost of these schools is £66,500, and the average cost per student is £26. No student can be admitted into the High School without providing satisfactory recommendations from the lower schools and passing a required examination. This system has significantly improved the lower schools, as poor behavior there would effectively prevent students from entering the High School. The average age for admission is fourteen, and a student must stay for five years before they can earn their degree as a Master of Arts, for which good moral character is essential. The school has around 500 students from all walks of life, from the hopes of the tinsmith to the heir of the toga-wearing judge.

The instruction is of so high an order that no private establishment can compete with it; in short, it may be said to embrace a very fair college education. Read the following list of professors: the Principal, who is also Professor of Moral, Mental, and Political Science; Professor of Practical Mathematics; of Theoretical Science and Astronomy; of History and Belles-Lettres; of Natural History; of Latin and Greek; of French and Spanish; of Drawing, Writing, and Book-keeping; of Chemistry and Natural Philosophy; and three assistants. The highest salary received by these professors is 270l. a-year, except that of Mr. Hart the Principal, which is 400l.; and in him all the responsibilities centre. This is the only school where I ever knew the old Saxon regularly taught. Instruction is given in various other studies not enumerated in the Professors' list; thus, in the class under the Professor of Natural History, botany, and anatomy, and such medical information as may be useful on any of the emergencies of every-day life are taught. No books are brought to this class; the instruction is entirely by lecture, and the subjects treated are explained by beautifully-executed transparencies, placed before a window by day, and before a bright jet of gas by night, and thus visible easily to all. The readiness with which I heard the pupils in this class answer the questions propounded to them showed the interest they took in the subject, and was a conclusive proof of the efficiency of the system of instruction pursued; they dived into the arcana of human and vegetable life with an ease that bore the most satisfactory testimony to the skill of the instructor and the attention of the pupils.

The instruction is so high-quality that no private school can compete with it; in short, it offers a pretty solid college education. Check out the following list of professors: the Principal, who is also the Professor of Moral, Mental, and Political Science; Professor of Practical Mathematics; of Theoretical Science and Astronomy; of History and Belles-Lettres; of Natural History; of Latin and Greek; of French and Spanish; of Drawing, Writing, and Book-keeping; of Chemistry and Natural Philosophy; and three assistants. The highest salary for these professors is £270 a year, except for Mr. Hart, the Principal, who makes £400; and all responsibilities land on him. This is the only school where I've ever known the old Saxon to be regularly taught. Instruction is also given in various other subjects not listed in the Professors' list; for example, in the class under the Professor of Natural History, students learn botany and anatomy, as well as useful medical information for everyday emergencies. No books are used in this class; teaching is done entirely through lectures, and the topics are illustrated by beautifully executed transparencies, displayed before a window during the day, and in front of a bright gas lamp at night, making them easily visible to everyone. The ease with which I heard the students in this class answer the questions asked showed their interest in the subject and was clear evidence of the system of instruction's effectiveness; they explored the workings of human and plant life with such ease that it was a strong testament to the instructor's skill and the students' attention.

There is a plan adopted at this school which I never saw before, and which Professor Hart told me was most admirable in its results. At the end of every three-quarters of an hour all the doors and windows in the house are opened simultaneously; the bell is then rung twice: at the first sound, all lectures, recitations, and exercises cease, and the students put their books, caps, &c., in readiness to move; at the second sound, all the classes move simultaneously from the room in which they have been studying to the room in which the next course of study is to be followed. The building is so arranged, that in passing from one room to another, they have to pass through the court round the house. This operation takes three minutes, and is repeated about eight times a-day, during which intervals all the doors and windows are open, thus thoroughly ventilating the rooms; but there is a further advantage, which is thus described in the Report,—"These movements are found very useful in giving periodically a fresh impulse both to the bodies and to the minds of the students, and in interrupting almost mechanically the dull monotony which is apt to befall school hours." The Principal told me, that, from careful observation, he looked upon this as one of the most valuable regulations in the establishment, and that it was difficult to rate its advantages too highly, the freshness of mind which it brought infinitely outweighing any loss of time, interruption, &c. I spent three interesting hours in this admirable institution.

There’s a plan in this school that I’ve never seen before, and Professor Hart told me it has excellent results. Every thirty minutes, all the doors and windows in the building are opened at the same time; then a bell rings twice: at the first ring, all lectures, recitations, and activities stop, and the students prepare their books, caps, etc., to leave; at the second ring, all classes move together from the room where they’ve been studying to the room for their next subject. The building is designed so that moving from one room to another requires passing through the courtyard. This process takes three minutes and is repeated about eight times a day, during which all doors and windows stay open, thoroughly ventilating the rooms. There’s another benefit, described in the report: “These movements prove very useful in providing a periodic fresh boost to both the bodies and minds of the students, helping to break up the dull monotony of school hours.” The Principal told me that, based on careful observation, he considers this one of the most valuable regulations in the school, and that its benefits are hard to overstate, as the mental refreshment it provides far outweighs any time lost or interruptions. I spent three interesting hours in this amazing institution.

The next establishment I visited was of a very different description; i.e., the jail of solitary confinement. I much wished to have seen some of the prisoners who had been confined for a length of time, but from some informality in the letter I brought, the guardian did not feel authorized to break through the regulations. The prisoners are sometimes confined here for twelve years; they are kept totally separate, but they are allowed to occupy themselves at different trades, &c., in their cells. My guide told me he had never seen any of them become the least idiotic or light-headed from long confinement. Their cells were clean and airy, and some had a little eight-feet-square garden attached; their food was both plentiful and good, and discipline was preserved by the rod of diet; "but," says the guide, "if they become very troublesome and obstinate we" ... what d'ye think?... "give them a shower-bath;" criminals here seem to hate fresh water as much as the tenants of the poor-houses in England do. The jail seems very well adapted for escaping; but I suppose the rifle-armed sentries at the angles of the wall keep them in sufficient awe, as I was told they very rarely get away. The number confined was two hundred and eighty.

The next place I visited was completely different; that is, the solitary confinement jail. I really wanted to see some of the prisoners who had been locked up for a long time, but due to a problem with the letter I brought, the guard didn’t feel authorized to bypass the rules. Some prisoners are kept here for up to twelve years; they are kept completely separate, but they can engage in different trades, etc., in their cells. My guide told me he had never seen any of them become even slightly idiotic or out of their minds from long isolation. Their cells were clean and well-ventilated, and some had a small eight-by-eight-foot garden attached; their food was both abundant and good, and discipline was maintained through their diet. "But," said the guide, "if they get really troublesome and stubborn, we" ... what do you think? ... "give them a shower." Criminals here seem to dislike fresh water just as much as the residents of poor houses in England do. The jail seems quite suitable for escapes; however, I guess the rifle-armed guards at the corners of the wall keep them in enough fear, as I was told they rarely manage to get away. The total number of prisoners was two hundred and eighty.

The last place I visited was the Lunatic Asylum, which appears admirably placed and admirably conducted. The situation commands a view of two public roads, where the bustle and stir of life are continually passing before their eyes, and with no visible fence intervening, the ground being so undulating and wooded as effectually to conceal the barrier. The grounds are pleasantly laid out in walks, gardens, hothouses, &c.; a comfortable reading-room and ten-pin alley[AF] are provided on each side, one for the males, the other for the females. The rooms and dormitories are large and airy, and carriages and horses are ready for such as the physician recommends should take that exercise. The comfort of the inmates appeared fully equal to that of any similar establishment I have visited, and the position far superior, for there was no visible barrier between them and the open country.

The last place I visited was the Lunatic Asylum, which is impressively situated and well-run. It offers a view of two public roads, where the hustle and bustle of life is constantly visible, and there’s no visible fence in the way since the ground is so rolling and wooded that it effectively hides the boundary. The grounds are nicely designed with paths, gardens, greenhouses, etc.; a comfortable reading room and bowling alley[AF] are available on either side, one for the men and the other for the women. The rooms and dormitories are spacious and well-ventilated, and carriages and horses are available for those the doctor recommends should take exercise. The comfort of the residents seemed fully equal to that of any similar facility I have visited, and the location is far better, as there’s no visible barrier between them and the open countryside.

But Time says to the traveller what the policeman says to the gathering crowd, "Move on, if you please, sir; move on." Obey is the word. Kind friends are left behind, the kettle hisses, the iron horse snorts, the Hudson is passed, New York is gained, the journey is behind me, bread, butter, and Bohea before me. "Go on," says Time. The Charleston steamer, "James Adger," is bursting to be off. Introduced to the agents, they introduced me to the skipper. The skipper seems to think I am his father; he insists upon my occupying his cabin—a jolly room, big enough to polka in—fifteen feet square. Thanks, most excellent skipper, "may your shadow never be less"—it is substantial enough now. Do you ask why I go to New York from Philadelphia to reach Charleston? The reply is simple:—to avoid the purgatory of an American railway, and to enjoy the life-giving breezes "that sweep o'er the ocean wave." The skipper was a regular trump; the service was clean, and we fed like fighting-cocks. The weather was fine, the ship a clipping good one, passengers few, but with just enough 'bacco-juice flying about the decks to remind me where I was.

But Time tells the traveler what the cop tells the crowd, "Please move along, sir; keep going." Obey is the key word. Good friends are left behind, the kettle is steaming, the train puffs, the Hudson is crossed, New York is reached, the trip is over, and I have bread, butter, and tea ahead of me. "Keep going," says Time. The Charleston steamer, "James Adger," is ready to depart. I was introduced to the agents, and they introduced me to the captain. The captain seems to think I’m his dad; he insists I take his cabin—a cheerful room, big enough to dance in—fifteen feet square. Thanks, great captain, "may your shadow never be less"—it’s plenty substantial now. Do you wonder why I’m going to New York from Philadelphia to get to Charleston? The answer is simple: to skip the nightmare of an American railway and enjoy the refreshing breezes "that sweep o’er the ocean wave." The captain was a real gem; the service was excellent, and we ate like kings. The weather was nice, the ship was great, there were few passengers, but just enough tobacco spit flying around the deck to remind me where I was.

One of our company was a charming rarity in his way. He was an Irish Yankee, aged eighty-three. A more perfect Paddy never existed; and so, of course, he talked about fighting, and began detailing to me the various frays in which "we whipt the Britishers." By way of chaffing him, I said, "No wonder; they were Anglo-Saxon blood, brought their courage from England, and were not only fighting at home, but with a halter round their necks." The old veteran got furious, cursed England and the Saxon blood, from Harold to the present hour; he then proved to his own satisfaction that all the great men in America, and all the soldiers, were Celts. "It was the Celts, sir, that whipt the Britishers; and, ould as I am, sure I'd like to take 20,000 men over to the ould counthree, and free it from the bloodthirsty villins, the Saxon brutes." If poor O'Brien had had half the fire of this old Yankee Paddy, he never would have been caught snoozing among the old widow's cabbages. I really thought the old gentleman would have burst outright, or collapsed from reaction; but it passed over like a white squall, and left the original octogenarian calm behind. The darkness of the third evening has closed in upon us, the struggling stream is bellowing for release, hawsers are flying about, boys running from them, and men after them; the good "James Adger" is coquetting about with those well-known young ladies, the Misses "Bakkur and Ternahed;" James seems determined to enjoy it for an unusually prolonged period this evening; but, like everything else, it must have an end, and at last good James lies snugly in his berth, alongside the wharf at Charleston. Cabmen and touters offer an infinity of services; passengers radiate—my Yankee Paddy, it is to be hoped, went to an ice-saloon. Your humble servant went to a boarding-house kept by a most worthy old lady, but where flies occupied one half the house, and the filthiest negro-boys the other. Several respectable people, out of regard to the old lady, were performing the penance of residing in her house: a trip on hot ashes from Dan to Beersheba would have been luxury by comparison. I resigned myself and got reconciled, as I saw the sincere desire of the dear old girl to make me as comfortable as she could; and by learning to eat my meals with my eyes shut, I got on tolerably well. But scarce had I set foot in this establishment which I have been describing, ere kind friends sprang up to greet me and offer me the use of their club-room, which was just opposite my boarding-house; and as this was only the prelude to endless other civilities, my lodging saw very little of me; which may be easily imagined, when it is recollected how famous Charleston is, not only for the good living which it affords, but for the liberal hospitality with which it is dispensed. A letter to one gentleman becomes, like magic, an "Open Sesame" to all the cellars and society in the place; and the only point in dispute is, who can show you most kindness.

One of our crew was a charming rarity in his own way. He was an Irish Yankee, eighty-three years old. There never was a more perfect Paddy; naturally, he talked about fighting and started sharing stories about the various skirmishes in which "we whipped the British." To tease him, I said, "No wonder; they were Anglo-Saxon blood, brought their courage from England, and were fighting not only at home but with a noose around their necks." The old veteran got furious, cursed England and the Saxon blood, from Harold to the present day; then he convinced himself that all the great men in America and all the soldiers were Celts. "It was the Celts, sir, that whipped the British; and, old as I am, I’d love to take 20,000 men back to the old country and free it from those bloodthirsty villains, the Saxon brutes." If poor O'Brien had had half the fire of this old Yankee Paddy, he would never have been caught dozing among the old widow's cabbages. I really thought the old gentleman would burst or collapse from the reaction; but it passed over like a sudden squall, leaving behind the calm original octogenarian. The darkness of the third evening has closed in on us, the struggling stream is roaring for release, ropes are flying about, boys are running from them, and men are chasing after them; the good "James Adger" is flirting with those well-known young ladies, the Misses "Bakkur and Ternahed;" James seems determined to enjoy himself for an unusually long time tonight; but, like everything else, it has to come to an end, and finally, good James lies comfortably in his berth at the wharf in Charleston. Cab drivers and touts offer endless services; passengers disperse—my Yankee Paddy, I hope, went to an ice cream parlor. Your humble servant went to a boarding house run by a very kind old lady, but where flies occupied half the building, and filthy young boys occupied the other half. Several respectable people, out of consideration for the old lady, were enduring the penance of living in her house: a trip over hot coals from Dan to Beersheba would have felt luxurious by comparison. I resigned myself and found peace, seeing the sincere effort of the dear old lady to make me as comfortable as she could; and by learning to eat my meals with my eyes shut, I managed fairly well. But hardly had I stepped into this place that I've been describing when kind friends appeared to greet me and offered me the use of their club room, located just across from my boarding house; and since this was just the beginning of countless other kindnesses, my lodging saw very little of me; which is easily imagined, considering how famous Charleston is, not only for its excellent food but for the generous hospitality extended. A letter to one gentleman magically turns into an "Open Sesame" to all the cellars and social circles in the area; and the only debate is who can show you the most kindness.

The town is conveniently situated between the Ashley and Cooper rivers, with a population of 25,000 whites and the same number of blacks; it is a mixture of all that is lovely and annoying. The houses have mostly little gardens attached to them, sparkling with tropical flowers, and the streets are shaded with avenues of trees. This is all very lovely to look upon; but when you go out to enjoy a stroll, if the air is still, a beefsteak would frizzle on the crown of your hat; and if there is the slightest breeze, the sandy dust, like an Egyptian khamseen, laughs at all precautions, blinding your eyes, stuffing your nose, filling your mouth, and bringing your hide to a state which I can find no other comparison for but that of a box intended to represent a stone pedestal, and which, when the paint has half dried, is sprinkled with sand to perfect the delusion. Thus you can understand the lovely and the annoying of which I have spoken. When the inhabitants wish to take a drive, there is a plank road about six miles long, which enables them to enjoy this luxury. If they are not content with this road, they must seek their pleasure with the carriages up to their axles in sand. There are three old royalist buildings still standing—viz., the Episcopal church, the Court-house, and the Exchange. The first reminds one warmly of the dear old parish church in England, with its heavy oak pulpit and the square family pews, and it sobers the mind as it leads the memory to those days when, if the church was not full of activity, it was not full of strife—when parishioners were not brought to loggerheads as to the colour of the preacher's gown—when there was no triangular duel (vide Marryat) as to candles, no candles, and lit candles—when, in short, if there was but moderate zeal about the substance, there was no quarrelling about the shadows of religion; and if we were not blessed with the zeal of a Bennet, we were not cursed with the strife of a Barnabas. At the time the colonists kicked us out of this place, by way of not going empty-handed, we bagged the church-bells as a trophy—(query, is not robbing a church sacrilege?)—and they eventually found their way into a merchant's store in England, where they remained for years. Not long since, having been ferreted out, they were replaced in their original position, and now summon the Republicans of the nineteenth century to their devotions as lustily as they did the Royalists in the eighteenth. There is nothing remarkable in the two other buildings, except their antiquity, and the associations arising therefrom.[AG]

The town is conveniently located between the Ashley and Cooper rivers, with a population of 25,000 white residents and the same number of Black residents; it’s a mix of everything beautiful and frustrating. Most houses have small gardens filled with vibrant tropical flowers, and the streets are lined with trees providing shade. This all looks great, but when you go out for a walk, if the air is still, a steak would sizzle on the top of your hat; and if there’s even a slight breeze, the sandy dust, like an Egyptian khamseen, attacks all precautions, blinding your eyes, clogging your nose, filling your mouth, and making your skin feel like it’s coated in sand, much like a box pretending to be a stone pedestal, which when half-painted is sprinkled with sand to enhance the illusion. So, you can understand the beauty and frustration I mentioned. When residents want to take a drive, there is a plank road about six miles long, allowing them to enjoy this convenience. If they aren’t satisfied with this road, they must fumble along in carriages stuck in sand. There are three old royalist buildings still standing—namely, the Episcopal church, the Court-house, and the Exchange. The church warmly reminds one of the beloved parish church in England, with its heavy oak pulpit and square family pews, and it brings to mind those days when, if the church wasn't bustling with activity, it wasn't filled with conflict—when congregants didn't argue over the color of the preacher’s gown—when there were no triangular duels (see Marryat) about whether to use candles, not use candles, or use lit candles—when, simply put, if there was some enthusiasm about the core beliefs, there was no fighting over the trivial aspects of religion; and if we didn't have the fervor of a Bennet, we didn't have the quarrels of a Barnabas. When the colonists kicked us out of this place, wanting to avoid leaving empty-handed, we took the church bells as a trophy—(just wondering, is robbing a church sacrilege?)—and they eventually ended up in a merchant’s store in England, where they stayed for years. Not long ago, after being discovered, they were returned to their original place, and now they summon the Republicans of the nineteenth century to their services as enthusiastically as they did the Royalists in the eighteenth. There’s nothing particularly noteworthy about the other two buildings, except for their age and the history that comes with them.[AG]

One of the most striking sights here is the turn-out of the Fire Companies on any gala day. They consist of eight companies, of one hundred each; their engines are brilliantly got up, and decorated tastefully with flowers; banners flying; the men, in gay but business-like uniform, dragging their engines about, and bands playing away joyously before them. The peculiarity of the Charleston firemen is that, instead of being composed of all the rowdies of the town, as is often the case in the large eastern cities, they are, generally speaking, the most respectable people in the community. This may partly be accounted for by the militia service being so hard, and the fines for the neglect of the same so heavy, from which all those serving in the Fire Companies are exempt.[AH] The South Carolinians, in anticipation of any insurrection among the negroes, or in case of being driven into secession by success attending the efforts of the Abolitionists, have very prudently established a little miniature West Point institution,[AI] where lads from fifteen to twenty receive a thorough military education, and then retire into private life and follow any pursuits they choose. By this means the nucleus of military officers requisite for an army is obtained, and the frequent drilling of the militia forms a solid groundwork for that latter, should the hour of necessity unfortunately arrive. The gay time of Charleston is during the races, which take place in February, and have a considerable reputation, although, perhaps, not quite so high as they had some few years back. I have never seen any of their racing studs; but, as they import from England some of the finest stallions that come into the market, and as the breed of horse in America is very active and enduring, their racers, it is to be presumed, make a very good show.

One of the most impressive sights here is the turnout of the Fire Companies on any celebration day. They consist of eight companies, each with one hundred members; their engines are brightly designed and tastefully decorated with flowers, with banners flying. The men, dressed in colorful yet professional uniforms, are dragging their engines around, while bands play joyfully in front of them. What’s unique about the Charleston firemen is that, unlike in many large eastern cities where the firefighters might be the roughest characters, they are generally among the most respected individuals in the community. This may be partly due to the strict militia service requirements and hefty fines for neglecting those duties, from which all firefighters are exempt.[AH] To prepare for any disturbances among the Black population or the possibility of secession due to successful Abolitionist efforts, South Carolinians have wisely set up a small West Point-style institution,[AI] where young men aged fifteen to twenty receive a thorough military education. Afterward, they return to civilian life and pursue any career they choose. This creates a base of military officers needed for an army, and the regular training of the militia provides a solid foundation for that in case of an emergency. The lively season in Charleston is during the races, which happen in February and have a good reputation, although perhaps not as high as they did a few years ago. I have never seen any of their racehorses, but since they import some of the finest stallions from England and the horse breed in America is very nimble and resilient, it's reasonable to assume their racers make quite an impressive showing.

Having impregnated my system with turtle, terrapin, mint-julep, and Madeira—the latter such as only America can show—I bade adieu to my kind and hospitable friends, and started for Virginia. The first part of the journey—i.e., as far as Wilmington—I performed in a wretched little steamer, anything but seaworthy, with horrid cribs, three one above the other, to sleep in, and a motley mixture of passengers, as usual. No particular incident occurred; and having fine weather, we escaped wrecking or putting back. On ascending the river to Wilmington, you see royal—I beg pardon, republican—sturgeons jumping about in all directions, and of all sizes, from three to five feet in length. We reached the town in time to catch the train, and off we started. When about six miles on our journey, a curious motion of the carriages, added to their "slantingdicular" position and accompanied by a slight scream, proclaimed that we were off the rails. Thank God! no lives were lost or limbs broken. The first person that I saw jump from the train was a Spanish colonel, who shot out with an activity far beyond his years, hugging to his bosom a beloved fiddle, which was the joy of his heart, and about the safety of which he was evidently as anxious as about his own. He sat down by the side of the carriages, a ludicrous picture of alarm and composure combined. He was on his way to England with the intention of presenting some musical compositions to the Queen, and possibly had a floating idea he might do a bit of Paganini before Her Gracious Majesty. Gradually, all the party unkenneled; and it was then discovered that, had we run off the rails a few yards further on, we should have had a nasty cropper down a thirty-feet bank; fortunately, we ran off on the level, and merely stuck in the sand.

Having filled myself with turtle, terrapin, mint julep, and Madeira—the kind that only America can provide—I said goodbye to my kind and hospitable friends and set off for Virginia. The first part of the journey—i.e., as far as Wilmington—I traveled on a poor little steamer, anything but seaworthy, with awful bunk beds stacked three high to sleep in and a random mix of passengers, as usual. Nothing particularly eventful happened; with nice weather, we avoided any wrecks or returns. As we moved up the river to Wilmington, you could see royal—I mean, republican—sturgeons jumping around in all directions, ranging from three to five feet long. We arrived in town just in time to catch the train, and off we went. About six miles into our journey, a strange motion of the train, along with its tilted position and a slight scream, indicated that we had derailed. Thankfully, no lives were lost or limbs broken. The first person I saw leap from the train was a Spanish colonel, who leaped out with surprising energy for his age, cradling a cherished fiddle that was the joy of his heart, clearly as worried about its safety as his own. He sat beside the carriages, a comical blend of panic and calm. He was headed to England to present some musical pieces to the Queen and probably had a fleeting thought of performing a bit of Paganini for Her Gracious Majesty. Gradually, the whole group emerged from the train, and it was then discovered that if we had derailed just a few yards farther, we would have taken a nasty tumble down a thirty-foot bank; fortunately, we derailed on flat ground and simply got stuck in the sand.

Upon inquiry as to the cause of the accident, I ascertained that it was in consequence of a point for turning off on to another set of rails being broken. Upon examining the said point, I found it was as worn and rotten as time could make it. I mentioned this to the engineer, who told me he was perfectly aware of it, and had reported it to the superintendent a fortnight before, but that he—the superintendent—had guessed it would do very well for some time yet; consequently, the engineer always went slower when approaching the spot, to avoid, if possible, an accident. By this precaution we had been saved the capsize over the bank, which otherwise would inevitably have been our fate. Thus, for the sake of twenty shillings, they had smashed an engine, doing damage to the amount of twenty pounds at least, besides risking the lives of all the passengers. What was to be done? There was nothing for it but to go back to Wilmington, chew the cud of disgust, and hope the rascally superintendent might break every bone in his body the first favourable opportunity. This done, and a night's rest over, we again tempted fate, and continued our journey, which for a long time ran through large pine-forests, every member of which community was a victim of laceration, inflicted on him for the purpose of drawing off his life's blood, which dribbled into a box at the root, and, when full, was carried off to make turpentine.

Upon asking about the cause of the accident, I found out it happened because a switch for turning onto another track was broken. When I looked at the switch, I saw it was as worn out and rotted as it could possibly get. I mentioned this to the engineer, who said he was fully aware of the issue and had reported it to the superintendent two weeks earlier. However, the superintendent thought it would hold up for a while longer; as a result, the engineer always slowed down when approaching that spot to avoid an accident. Thanks to this caution, we managed to avoid tipping over the bank, which would have certainly happened otherwise. So, for the sake of twenty shillings, they totaled an engine, causing at least twenty pounds in damage, in addition to putting the lives of all the passengers at risk. What could be done? There was nothing to do but head back to Wilmington, stew in frustration, and hope the dishonest superintendent would break every bone in his body at the first chance he got. After that, and a night’s rest, we took another chance and continued our trip, which for a long stretch went through vast pine forests, each tree a victim of being cut into for its sap, which dripped into a box at the base, and when full, was taken away to make turpentine.

Arrived at Peterborough, we found the population so far behind the American age, that they would not allow a railroad to pass through their town; we were consequently constrained to shift into omnibuses, and drive some three miles to the station on the other side. As this trip was peculiarly barren of incident, it may gratify the reader to be informed, that in the confusion of shifting from one station to the other I lost my best and only hat. I hope this simple record will be received as conclusive evidence of the monotony and dullness of the journey. I do not mention it to excite sympathy, for I am happy to say that I have since purchased a new and a better one; and in case my old one is found, I hereby will and bequeath the same to the mayor of Peterborough, his heirs and successors, hoping that they may wear no other until a railroad round or through the town connects the termini. Again we mount the iron horse—time flies—light mingles with darkness—and at nine o'clock I alight at the Royal Exchange Hotel, Richmond. Soap and water, tea and bed, follow in quick succession, and then comes the land of dreams and oblivion.

Arriving in Peterborough, we found the locals so out of touch with modern times that they wouldn't let a railroad go through their town. So, we had to switch to buses and travel about three miles to the station on the other side. Since this trip was particularly uneventful, it might interest the reader to know that in the chaos of switching from one station to another, I lost my best and only hat. I hope this simple account will serve as clear evidence of the monotony and dullness of the journey. I’m not mentioning it to get sympathy because I’m happy to say I've since bought a new and better one; and if my old hat is found, I hereby give it to the mayor of Peterborough, his heirs, and successors, hoping they won’t wear anything else until a railroad passes through or around the town. Again, we board the train—time flies—light blends with darkness—and at nine o'clock, I arrive at the Royal Exchange Hotel in Richmond. Soap and water, tea, and bed come quickly, and then I drift into the land of dreams and forgetfulness.

Richmond is a lovely spot, situated on the northern bank of James River, one hundred and fifty miles from the sea, and is the capital of Virginia. It contains nearly 30,000 inhabitants of whom 1000 are slaves. Being built upon several hills, it is free from the eternal sameness of level and regularity of lines which tire the eye so much in New York, Philadelphia, &c., and its site resembles more that of Boston or Baltimore. The James River is navigable for small vessels as high as Richmond; but just above the town there is a barrier which arrests alike the navigator's course and the traveller's eye. This barrier is called the Rapids, and is a most beautiful feature in the scenery.

Richmond is a beautiful place located on the northern bank of the James River, one hundred and fifty miles from the ocean, and serves as the capital of Virginia. It has nearly 30,000 residents, including 1,000 who are enslaved. Because it’s built on several hills, it avoids the monotonous flatness and uniform lines that can be tiring to the eye in cities like New York or Philadelphia, resembling more the landscapes of Boston or Baltimore. The James River is navigable for small boats all the way up to Richmond, but just above the city, there’s a barrier that halts both the navigator’s journey and the traveler’s view. This barrier, known as the Rapids, is a stunning feature of the scenery.

The Rapids are about three-quarters of a mile in extent, having a fall of more than one hundred feet in that distance. The stream is broad, and interspersed with endless little wooded islands and rocks, around and above which it dashes the spray and foam in its impetuous descent. The climate is lovely, the atmosphere pearly; and when, from the height above, you look down upon the panorama spread beneath your feet, it recalls to the mind the beautiful view so many of us must have frequently been entranced with, while inhaling the meditative weed and strolling along Richmond-terrace on a summer afternoon, gazing on old Father Thames glowing in the rays of a setting sun, and looking doubly bright from the sombre shade of the venerable timber which fringes the margin of this sluggish stream. Pardon this digression; those only who have wandered so far away can feel the indefinite, indescribable pleasure with which one grasps at anything that recals the home of one's affections, the scenes of early days, and the dear friends who are still enjoying them.

The Rapids stretch for about three-quarters of a mile, plunging over a drop of more than a hundred feet in that distance. The stream is wide and filled with countless little wooded islands and rocks, over which it splashes spray and foam in its wild descent. The weather is beautiful, and the air has a pearly quality; when you look down from above at the view spread out below, it reminds you of the stunning sights many of us have often admired while enjoying a quiet moment and walking along Richmond Terrace on a summer afternoon, gazing at the River Thames glowing in the rays of the setting sun, appearing even brighter against the deep shadows of the ancient trees lining its banks. Sorry for this digression; only those who have traveled far away can truly understand the vague, indescribable joy of clinging to anything that reminds them of their beloved home, the scenes of their youth, and the dear friends still enjoying them.

The best place for reviewing the Rapids is from the drive leading to the Cemetery, which here, as in most large American towns, is one of the prettiest spots in the neighbourhood; but the Rapids are not only ornamental, they are eminently useful. They afford a water-power to several mills, one of which, the Gallego Flour-Mill, is a splendid establishment, six stories high, nearly one hundred feet square, and capable of sending out daily 1200 barrels of flour. The flour is of very superior quality, the brand fetching a higher price than that of most others in the country. There are also rolling-mills, cotton and tobacco factories; the latter of course in great quantities, as tobacco is one of the chief products of the state, and rapidly increasing. The produce entered in Richmond, which in 1851 was under 16,000 hogsheads, in 1852 amounted to more than 24,000, and is now very probably above 30,000. Virginia has the honour of being the first State that raised cotton, the cultivation whereof was commenced in the year 1662.

The best spot to view the Rapids is from the road leading to the Cemetery, which, like in most large American towns, is one of the prettiest places in the area. However, the Rapids are not just pretty; they are extremely useful too. They provide water power for several mills, including the impressive Gallego Flour-Mill, a six-story building that's nearly one hundred feet square and can produce 1,200 barrels of flour daily. The flour is of very high quality, fetching a higher price than most other brands in the country. There are also rolling mills, as well as cotton and tobacco factories; the latter, of course, in large quantities, since tobacco is one of the main products of the state and is growing rapidly. The amount of tobacco brought to Richmond, which was under 16,000 hogsheads in 1851, rose to more than 24,000 in 1852, and is now likely over 30,000. Virginia has the distinction of being the first state to raise cotton, with cultivation starting in 1662.

Let us pass on to the hill at the eastern extremity of the city, commanding a panoramic view of the river below the town, and all the surrounding country. One spot arrests the attention, a spot closed with the deepest and most romantic interest. A solitary tree, to which no sacrilegious hand has yet dared to apply the axe, stands a few miles down the river, on the same side as the town, and marks the site of the lodge of the venerable old chieftain, Powhattan, when as yet the colony was in its infancy, and when the Indian and the white man—the spoiler and the spoiled—were looking at each other with mutual distrust, deep fear on one side and dark foreboding on the other. The Indian is no more; and nought remains as a memorial of this chief who once ruled this fertile land with absolute sway, except this solitary tree;—and what an episode in the history of colonization does that tree recal! Who can forget that, when despair was the Colonists' daily bread, when nought but the energy and genius of Smith—a man of very ordinary name, but of no ordinary character—kept hope flickering in its socket, an attack of Indians made him a prisoner, and left them hopeless. Then, how romantic the tale of his captivity! He betrayed no fear, but retained perfect self-possession; and remembering how easy their superstitious minds could be worked upon, he drew forth, and with great solemnity commenced looking steadily at his pocket-compass, and thence to heaven, alternating between the two, until he impressed them with a feeling of awe, as though he were a superior being communing with the Great Spirit. This feeling gradually wearing off, the captors insisted upon his death, as an expiation for the many injuries they had experienced at the hands of the whites. The tribe meet, the block is prepared, the captive's neck is laid ready, the upraised tomahawk, held by a brawny Indian arm, whose every muscle quivers with revenge, glitters in the sunbeams; swarthy figures around, thirsting for blood, anxiously await the sacrifice of the victim, already too long delayed. Hope has fled from the captive's breast, and he is communing in earnest with the Great Spirit into whose presence he is about to be so sadly and speedily ushered. Suddenly a shriek is heard! At that well-known voice the savage arm falls helpless at its side, as, stretched upon the neck of the despairing captive, lies the lovely daughter of Powhattan, with tearful eye, and all the wild energy of her race, vowing she will not survive the butchery of her kindest friend. Ruthless hands would tear her away, and complete the bloody tragedy. Who dares lay even a finger upon the noble daughter of their adored chief? They stand abashed, revenge and doubt striving in their hearts; the eloquence of love and mercy pleading irresistibly from the eyes of Pocahontas. The tomahawk, upraised by man's revenge for the work of a captive's death, descends, when moved by woman's tears, to cut a captive's bonds.

Let’s go to the hill at the eastern edge of the city, which offers a stunning view of the river below and the surrounding countryside. One spot catches our eye, filled with deep and romantic significance. A lone tree, which no one has dared to chop down, stands a few miles downriver on the same side as the town, marking the site of the lodge of the venerable old chief, Powhatan, at a time when the colony was still new and when the Indian and the white man—the aggressor and the victim—looked at each other with mutual distrust, with deep fear on one side and dark uncertainty on the other. The Indian is gone now, and the only memorial left of this chief, who once ruled this fertile land unchallenged, is this solitary tree; and what a chapter in the story of colonization that tree brings to mind! Who can forget that, when despair was a daily reality for the colonists, it was only the energy and genius of Smith—a man with an ordinary name but an extraordinary character—that kept hope alive? An Indian attack made him a prisoner and left them without hope. And how romantic is the story of his captivity! He showed no fear but maintained perfect composure; remembering how easily they could be influenced by superstition, he pulled out his pocket compass with great solemnity and began to gaze steadily at it and then at the sky, alternating between the two until he instilled in them a sense of awe, as if he were a superior being connecting with the Great Spirit. As that feeling slowly faded, the captors demanded his death as a way to pay for the many wrongs they had suffered at the hands of the whites. The tribe gathered, the block was set, the captive's neck was ready, and the raised tomahawk, held by a muscular Indian whose every muscle quivered with revenge, sparkled in the sunlight; dark figures around him, eager for blood, waited impatiently for the sacrifice of the victim, which had taken too long to happen. Hope had left the captive’s heart, and he was earnestly connecting with the Great Spirit whose presence he was about to enter. Suddenly, a cry pierced the air! At the sound of that familiar voice, the savage arm fell lifeless to its side as Powhatan’s beautiful daughter, with tear-filled eyes and all the fierce passion of her people, threw herself across the captive’s neck, vowing that she wouldn’t live to see her kindest friend slaughtered. Ruthless hands tried to pull her away, ready to finish the bloody tragedy. Who would even dare to touch the beloved daughter of their revered chief? They stood frozen, caught between revenge and doubt; the pleading eyes of Pocahontas, filled with love and mercy, were irresistible. The tomahawk, raised by a man’s desire for revenge for the captive's death, came down when moved by a woman’s tears to cut the captive’s bonds.

Callous indeed must that man's heart be, who can gaze upon the spot where the noble Pocahontas—reared among savages, 'mid the solemn grandeur of the forest, and beneath, the broad canopy of heaven, with no Gospel light to guide and soften—received the holy impulses of love and mercy fresh from her Maker's hand; and how gratifying to remember, that she who had thus early imbibed these sacred feelings, became soon after a convert to Christianity. Alas! how short her Christian career. Marrying Mr. J. Rolfe, she died in childbirth ere she had reached her twenty-fifth year, and from her many of the oldest families in Virginia at this day have their origin. Virginia, as is well known, has always been considered an aristocratic State; and it is a kind of joke—in allusion to this Indian origin—for other States to speak disparagingly of the F.F.Vs.—alias first families of Virginia. Let those who sneer, seek carefully amid their musty ancestral rolls for a nobler heart than that of Pocahontas, the joy of Powhattan's house and the pride of all his tribe. How strange, that a scene so well known as the foregoing, and a life so adventurous as that of Smith, has never yet engaged the pen of a Cooper or a Bulwer!

Callous indeed must a man's heart be, who can look at the place where the noble Pocahontas—raised among Indigenous people, amidst the majestic forest, and under the vast sky, with no Gospel light to guide and soften—received the holy feelings of love and mercy directly from her Creator; and how satisfying to remember that she, who had absorbed these sacred emotions early on, soon became a convert to Christianity. Alas! how brief her Christian journey. Marrying Mr. J. Rolfe, she died in childbirth before she turned twenty-five, and from her lineage, many of the oldest families in Virginia trace their roots today. Virginia, as we all know, has always been regarded as an aristocratic State, and it’s a sort of joke—referring to this Indigenous origin—for other States to speak negatively of the F.F.Vs.—alias first families of Virginia. Let those who mock search carefully through their dusty ancestral records for a nobler heart than Pocahontas's, the joy of Powhatan's house and the pride of all his tribe. How strange that a scene so well-known as this and a life as adventurous as Smith's has never captured the attention of a writer like Cooper or Bulwer!

One of my friends in New York had given me a letter to a gentleman in Richmond, at whose house I called soon after my arrival, as my stay was necessarily short. He was out in the country, at his plantation. This disappointment I endeavoured to rectify by enclosing the letter; but when I had done so, Sambo could not tell me how to address it, as he was in ignorance both of the place and its distance. In this dilemma, and while ransacking my brain-box how to remedy the difficulty, a lady came in, and having passed me, Sambo—grinning through a chevaux-de-frise of snow-white ivories—informed me that was "his Missus." I instantly sent the letter in to her to receive its direction, and in lieu of my letter received an immediate summons to walk in. Nothing could be more lady-like and cordial than the reception she gave me. Shy as I am, she immediately put me quite at my ease; in less than a quarter of an hour I felt I was in the society of an old friend; and during my stay in Richmond, each day found me in the same snug corner of the sofa, near the fire, enjoying the society of one of the most amiable and agreeable ladies it has ever been my good fortune to meet. The husband soon returned from the plantation, and then all the hospitalities of the house were as much at my disposal as if it had been my own, and one or the other of these kind friends, if not both, daily lionized me over Richmond or its neighbourhood. I feel sure, that any of my countrymen who have visited this city when Mr. and Mrs. Stanard were staying in town, will readily hear testimony to their kind hospitality and agreeable society.

One of my friends in New York had given me a letter to a guy in Richmond, so I stopped by his house right after I arrived, since my visit was going to be short. He was out at his plantation, which was a letdown. I tried to fix this by sending the letter, but when I did, Sambo didn’t know how to address it since he wasn’t familiar with the place or how far it was. In this tricky situation, while I was trying to figure it out, a lady walked in, and after passing me, Sambo—grinning with a big smile—told me that she was "his Missus." I quickly handed the letter to her to get the right address, and instead of a response, I got an immediate invitation to come in. She welcomed me in a way that was both warm and graceful. Although I can be shy, she made me feel comfortable right away; in less than fifteen minutes, it felt like I was among old friends. During my time in Richmond, I found myself in the same cozy spot on the sofa, near the fire, enjoying the company of one of the most pleasant and charming ladies I’ve ever met. Her husband came back from the plantation soon after, and their hospitality was mine to enjoy as if it were my own home. Either one or both of these kind friends took me around Richmond or its nearby areas every day. I’m confident that anyone from my country who has visited this city while Mr. and Mrs. Stanard were in town will agree with me about their generous hospitality and delightful company.

There are various public buildings here, among the most conspicuous of which is the Capitol, built in the great public square, and from its summit commanding a splendid panoramic view. There are also about thirty churches, one of which, the Monumental Church—which is Episcopalian—stands upon ground of melancholy recollections; for here, in 1811, stood the theatre, which during that year was utterly consumed by a fire, in which the governor and scores of other human beings perished. One great cause of the destruction of life was, having the doors of the building fitted to open inwards—a custom, the folly of which is only equalled by its universality. At the cry of fire, the rush to the doors was so great that it was impossible to open them, owing to the pressure. The only avenues of escape were the windows, in retreating through which, the greater number of those few who succeeded in escaping suffered the most serious injuries. How is this absurd practice of doors opening inwards to be stopped? What think you if Insurance Companies would combine, and make people forfeit their insurance if they entered any public building whose doors were so fitted; or perhaps the Chancellor of the Exchequer might bring in a bill to levy a very heavy tax on all public buildings the doors of which opened in this dangerous manner, and containing a stringent clause compelling managers and all parties concerned to support the widows and orphans, and pay the doctors' fees, arising from accidents caused therefrom. Alas! I fear until—as Sydney Smith would say—we reduce a few cabinet ministers and a leading member or two of the House of Peers to cinders, we shall go on in our folly, because our ancestors did so before us.

There are several public buildings here, the most noticeable of which is the Capitol, located in the big public square and offering a fantastic panoramic view from its top. There are also about thirty churches, one of which, the Monumental Church—an Episcopalian church—sits on ground filled with sorrowful memories; here, in 1811, there was a theater that was completely destroyed by a fire that year, claiming the lives of the governor and many others. A major reason for such a loss of life was that the building's doors were designed to open inwards—a practice that is as foolish as it is widespread. When the alarm sounded, the rush toward the doors was so intense that they couldn't be opened due to the force. The only escape routes were the windows, and most of those who managed to flee through them suffered serious injuries. How can we put an end to this ridiculous practice of inward-opening doors? What if insurance companies teamed up to make people lose their insurance if they entered any public building with such doors? Or maybe the Chancellor of the Exchequer could introduce a bill that imposes a hefty tax on all public buildings with doors that open this dangerous way, with a strict clause requiring owners and others involved to support the widows and orphans and cover medical bills resulting from accidents caused by it. Sadly, I fear that until—as Sydney Smith would say—we see a few cabinet ministers and a couple of notable members of the House of Peers turned to ashes, we will continue in our foolish ways, just like our ancestors did before us.

Among other places I went to was the public billiard-room, and on entering, my sympathies were immediately aroused by seeing a lad about thirteen or fourteen, with a very extensive flaming choker on, above which was a frightful large swelling. Not being a medical man, I was very much puzzled when I saw the said swelling move about like a penny roll in a monkey's cheek; presently the sympathy fled, and the puzzle was solved, as a shower of 'bacco juice deluged the floor. Poor boy! it must have taken him an hour's hard work to have got the abominable mass in, and it could only have been done by instalments: the size it had reached would have broken any jaw to remove in the lump; but he seemed to have no idea of parting with his treasure, which, to do him justice, he rolled about with as much ease as if he had had a monkey-teacher before him from his cradle; nor did it prevent his betting away in a style that quite astonished a steady old gentleman like myself.

Among the places I visited was the public billiard room, and as soon as I walked in, I felt a surge of sympathy for a boy around thirteen or fourteen, wearing a huge, bright choker. Above it was a dreadful large swelling. Not being a doctor, I was really confused when I saw the swelling moving around like a penny roll in a monkey's cheek; soon my sympathy faded, and the mystery was solved when a spray of tobacco juice flooded the floor. Poor kid! It must have taken him an hour of hard work to stuff that awful mass in, and he could only have done it in bits: the size it had reached would have dislocated any jaw if removed all at once; yet he seemed completely attached to his treasure, which, to be fair, he managed with as much skill as if he had a monkey for a teacher since childhood; it didn’t stop him from gambling in a way that completely surprised a sensible old gentleman like me.

The State of Virginia, like all the other States of the Union, is undergoing the increasing pressure of democracy:[AJ] one of its features—which is peculiarly obnoxious to the more sober-minded of the community—is the new arrangement for the division of the electoral districts, and which goes by the name of "Gerymander." In the early days of the Republic, all divisions were made by straight lines, or as near straight as possible; but that fair and natural mode of division is not considered by the autocratic democracy as sufficiently favourable to their views; and the consequence is, that other divisions have been substituted, most irregular in shape, so as if possible to annihilate entirely the already weakened opposition. This operation, my informant told me, acquired a kind of celebrity in Massachusetts some years ago; and, in the discussions upon the subject in their State legislature, one of the speakers is said to have compared some of these arbitrary divisions to a salamander which, in their outline they somewhat resembled. The governor of the State was of the democratic party, and therefore supporting and encouraging these changes, and his name was "Gery;" so a wag interrupted the speaker, exclaiming, "Don't say salamander; call it Gerymander,"—by which name it has been known since that day.

The State of Virginia, like all the other States in the Union, is feeling the growing pressure of democracy:[AJ] One aspect of this, which annoys the more serious members of society, is the new system for dividing electoral districts, known as "Gerrymandering." In the early days of the Republic, all divisions were made with straight lines, or as close to straight as possible; but that fair and straightforward way of dividing is not viewed by the dominating democracy as favorable enough for their goals. As a result, they have created new divisions that are most irregular in shape, aiming to completely eliminate the already weakened opposition. This tactic, my source told me, gained some notoriety in Massachusetts years ago; during discussions on the topic in their State legislature, one speaker reportedly compared some of these arbitrary divisions to a salamander, as they somewhat resembled its outline. The governor of the State was from the democratic party and therefore supported these changes, and his name was "Gery;" so a clever person interrupted the speaker, saying, "Don't say salamander; call it Gerrymander,"—and that’s the name it has since been known by.

I may here as well mention a little occurrence I witnessed, which, however pleasant it may have been to the democratic rowdies enacting it, must have been anything but agreeable to those operated upon. A fire company was out trying its engine and hoses, and followed of course by a squad of the idle and unwashed. Arrived at the market-place, they tried its range; that appeared satisfactory enough; but the idea seems to have struck the man who held the hose-end, that range without good aim was useless: he accordingly looked round for a target, and a glass coach passing by at the time, it struck him as peculiarly suited for his experiment. Two elderly females were inside, and a white Jehu on the box. In the most deliberate manner he pointed his weapon, amidst encouraging shouts from bystanders, and increasing zeal on the part of the pumpers; lucidly the windows were closed, or the ladies would have been drenched; as it was, the gushing stream rattled against the carriage, then fixed itself steadily upon poor Jehu, frightening the horses and nearly knocking him off the box. Naturally enough Jehu was highly incensed, and pulled up; then getting off the box, he walked up to his assailants, who received him with shouts of laughter; the horses, left without a ruler, started off at a gallop, Jehu ran after them, but luckily another person and myself rushed up, and stopped them before any accident occurred.

I might as well mention a little incident I witnessed, which, while it was quite entertaining for the rowdy crowd participating in it, must have been anything but enjoyable for those affected. A fire company was out testing its engine and hoses, and naturally, they were followed by a group of idle onlookers. When they arrived at the market square, they tested the hose’s range, which seemed satisfactory. However, the guy holding the hose seemed to realize that having range without good aim was pointless, so he looked around for a target. A fancy coach passing by caught his eye as particularly suitable for his experiment. Inside were two older ladies, and a white driver on the box. With great determination, he aimed his hose, encouraged by shouts from the crowd and the pumpers’ growing enthusiasm. Luckily, the windows were closed; otherwise, the ladies would have been soaked. As it was, the stream of water hit the carriage, then settled firmly on the poor driver, startling the horses and almost knocking him off the box. Unsurprisingly, the driver was furious and stopped. He got down from the box and walked up to his attackers, who met him with laughter. Meanwhile, the horses, left without guidance, took off at a gallop. The driver ran after them, but fortunately, another person and I rushed up and stopped them before anything bad happened.

All this took place at noonday, and not a voice was raised against it. If I had presumed to interfere with this liberty of the subject, the chances are I should have been tied to one of the posts of the market-place and made to stand target for an hour. It must be a charming thing when the masses rule supreme. Fancy St. James's-street, upon a drawing-room day, full of a pleasant little water-dispensing community such as this;—what cheers they would raise as a good shot took off some Jarvy's cocked-hat and bob-wig, or sent his eighteen-inch-diameter bouquet flying into the street!--then what fun to play upon the padded calves and silk stockings of Patagonian John, as he stood behind!--and only imagine the immense excitement, if by good luck they could smash some window and deluge a live aristocrat! What a nice thing a pure democracy must be! how the majority must enjoy themselves! how the minority must rejoice at the mild rule of bone over brain! What a glorious idea, equality! only excelled by that gigantic conception of Messrs. Cobden and Co., yclept the Peace Society, upon which such a bloody comment was enacted before Sevastopol.

All this happened at noon, and not a single voice was raised against it. If I had dared to interfere with this freedom of the people, I probably would have been tied to one of the posts in the market and made a target for an hour. It must be lovely when the masses are in charge. Just imagine St. James's Street on a drawing-room day, filled with a cheerful little water-dispensing community like this—what cheers they would give as a good shot knocked off some cab driver's cocked hat and wig or sent his huge bouquet flying into the street! Then there would be so much fun poking at the padded calves and silk stockings of Patagonian John as he stood behind! And just think of the immense excitement if, by chance, they could break a window and splash a live aristocrat! How wonderful a pure democracy must be! How much the majority must enjoy themselves! How the minority must celebrate the gentle dominance of the masses over the few! What a glorious idea equality is! It’s only surpassed by the grand vision of Messrs. Cobden and Co., called the Peace Society, which saw such a bloody reality before Sevastopol.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

General Cadwallader, whose hospitality is well known to all strangers visiting Philadelphia.


Alas! she has since met a melancholy death, being accidentally poisoned in Mexico, on the 18th of June, 1854; but her fame is as imperishable as her life was stainless.


The origin of ten-pins is amusing enough, and is as follows:—The State having passed an act, during a time when religious fervour was at high pressure, prohibiting nine-pin alleys, a tenth pin was added, and the law evaded. In the meantime, high pressure went below the boiling point, and the ten-pin alley remains to this day, an amusement for the people, and a warning to indiscreet legislators.


The commercial prosperity of South Carolina appears to be increasing steadily, if not rapidly. The cotton produce was—
                         In 1847.     In 1852.
    Bales, main land     336,562       472,338
    Ditto, sea islands    13,529        20,500
                         -------       -------
    Total                350,091       492,838
                         -------       -------

    Rice in 1847     146,260 tierces.
    Do. in 1852      137,497 ditto.
The average value of the bale (450lbs.) of main land cotton is from 6l. to 8l. sterling; of the sea-island cotton, from 30l to 36l. sterling. The average price of a tierce of rice (600lbs.) is from 3l. 5s. to 4l.


Independent of the enormous charge of fifty per cent. on the taxes you pay, there is also a small fine for each parade missed.


Vide chapter on "Military Education."


Vide chapter on "The Constitution."



CHAPTER XV.

From a River to a Racecourse.




Having enjoyed as much of the hospitalities of my kind friends as time permitted, I obtained a letter of introduction, and, embarking in a steamer, started for Williamsburg, so called after King William III. On our way down, we picked up as healthy and jolly a set of little ducks in their 'teens as one could wish to see. On inquiring what this aggregate of rosy cheeks and sunny smiles represented, I was informed they were the sum total of a ladies' school at Williamsburg—and a very charming sum total they were. Having a day's holiday, they had come up by the early steamer to pic-nic on the banks, and were now returning to chronology and crotchet-work, or whatever else their studies might be. Landing at King's Mills, a "'bus" took us all up to Williamsburg, a distance of three or four miles, one half of which was over as dreary a road as need be, and the other through a shady forest grove.

Having enjoyed the hospitality of my kind friends as much as time allowed, I got a letter of introduction and, boarding a steamer, headed for Williamsburg, named after King William III. On our way down, we picked up a lively group of teenage girls that were as cheerful and healthy as you could hope to see. When I asked who this bunch of rosy cheeks and sunny smiles was, I was told they were the entire ladies' school from Williamsburg—and they were indeed a delightful group. Having a day off, they had come up on the early steamer for a picnic by the river and were now returning to their studies and crafts, or whatever else they were learning. After landing at King's Mills, a bus took us all the way to Williamsburg, about three or four miles, half of which was over a pretty dreary road and the other half through a shady forest grove.

This old city is composed of a straight street, at one end of which is the establishment occupied by the rosy cheeks of whom we have been speaking, and which is very neat and clean-looking; at the other end—only with half a mile of country intervening—is the college. On each side of the said street is a crescent of detached houses, with a common before them. The population is 1500, and has not varied—as far as I could learn—in the memory of the oldest inhabitant. I naturally felt very much interest in visiting this place, as it was originally the seat of the royal government, and my grandfather had been the last governor of the state. The body of the old palace was burnt down by accident, while occupied by French troops, in 1782. The foundations, which were six feet thick, are still traceable, although most of the bricks have been used for the buildings in the neighbourhood. The outlines of the old garden and its terraces may also be traced, and a very charming spot it must have been. There are two beautiful lime-trees in a thriving state, which, I was told, he had planted himself from seeds he had brought from home. His thoughts were evidently on that far-off home when he planted them; for, as to position relatively to each other and distance from the old palace, they precisely coincide with two beneath which many of my early days were passed, at the old family mansion of Glenfinarl, on Loch Fine, which has since become the property of Mr. Douglas.

This old city has a straight street, with a neat and clean establishment at one end where the rosy-cheeked person we’ve been talking about is, and at the other end—just half a mile of countryside in between—there’s the college. On each side of this street are a row of detached houses, with a common area in front of them. The population is 1500 and hasn't changed—as far as I could tell—in the memory of the oldest resident. I was really interested in visiting this place because it was originally the seat of the royal government, and my grandfather was the last governor of the state. The old palace was accidentally burned down by French troops in 1782. The foundations, which are six feet thick, can still be seen, although most of the bricks have been repurposed for nearby buildings. You can also trace the outlines of the old garden and its terraces, which must have been a lovely spot. There are two beautiful lime trees thriving there, which, I was told, he planted himself from seeds he brought from home. He was clearly thinking of that distant home when he planted them; the way they’re positioned relative to each other and their distance from the old palace matches exactly with two that shaded many of my early days at the old family mansion of Glenfinarl, on Loch Fine, which has since become Mr. Douglas's property.

There is an old ditch in the neighbourhood, which goes by the name of Lord Dunmore's Ditch. The history which my informant gave me thereof is absurd enough, and there is a negro of the name of Isaac still living who remembers all the circumstances. It appears that Lord Dunmore, having found fault with an Irish labourer for not doing sufficient work, Paddy replied, "'Faith, if 'twas yer 'onnur that had the shpade in yer hand, maybe one-half would satisfy yer 'onnur." The Governor, who happened to be a man of iron frame, and not at all averse to a joke, immediately took up Paddy's challenge, and replied, "Paddy, I'll work four hours against you in a ditch for a month's wages." The combatants set to work the following morning, and at the end of four hours Paddy was obliged to confess himself beaten, and the result of my grandfather's labours goes by the name of Lord Dunmore's Ditch to this day.

There’s an old ditch in the neighborhood known as Lord Dunmore's Ditch. The story I heard about it is pretty ridiculous, and there’s a guy named Isaac who still remembers all the details. It seems that Lord Dunmore scolded an Irish laborer for not doing enough work, and Paddy replied, “If it were your honor holding the shovel, maybe half the work would satisfy you.” The Governor, who was a tough guy and could appreciate a joke, took up Paddy's challenge and said, “Paddy, I’ll work four hours in a ditch against you for a month’s wages.” They started their challenge the next morning, and after four hours, Paddy had to admit he lost, and that’s how my grandfather's efforts became known as Lord Dunmore's Ditch.

The only parts of the old palace still standing are the two wings, one of which is now the parsonage, and the other a school, which is kept by an Englishman, educated at one of our universities, and living here for his health. This place is both a well-chosen and a favourite locality for schools, being situated upon a high plateau of land, with James River on one side and York River on the other; consequently, the air is peculiarly healthy and pure.

The only parts of the old palace that are still standing are the two wings, one of which is now used as the parsonage, and the other as a school run by an Englishman who studied at one of our universities and is living here for his health. This location is a popular choice for schools because it’s set on a high plateau, with the James River on one side and the York River on the other; as a result, the air is particularly healthy and fresh.

The most imposing, if not the most useful, of the scholastic establishments is the college, which was founded by William and Mary in the year 1692. It contains a very fair library of old books, but comparatively few additions appear to have been made in latter years. The building bears every internal mark of neglect and dilapidation, defaced walls, broken plaster, &c. Upon entering the lecture-room, a quantity of eighteen-inch square boxes full of moisture suggest the idea of a rainy day and a roofless chamber. Be not deceived: these are merely receptacles for the discharge of the students' 'bacco juice; and the surrounding floor gives painful demonstration that their free spirits scorn the trammels of eighteen-inch boundaries, however profusely supplied. From what causes I cannot say, but the college has been all but deserted until lately. The present authorities are striving to infuse into it a little vitality of usefulness. With these simple facts before me, it was amusing to read, in an American gazetteer of the day, that the college "is at present in a flourishing condition."

The most impressive, if not the most practical, of the academic institutions is the college, founded by William and Mary in 1692. It has a decent collection of old books, but not many new ones seem to have been added in recent years. The building shows clear signs of neglect and disrepair, with damaged walls, broken plaster, etc. Upon entering the lecture room, you see a bunch of eighteen-inch square boxes full of moisture, giving the impression of a rainy day in a room without a roof. Don’t be fooled: these are just containers for students' spit from chewing tobacco; and the floor around them clearly shows that their free spirits disregard the limits of those eighteen-inch spaces, no matter how full they are. For reasons I can't explain, the college has been nearly deserted until recently. The current administration is trying to breathe some life into it and make it more useful. With these simple facts in mind, it was amusing to read, in a contemporary American gazetteer, that the college "is currently in a flourishing condition."

In front of the college there is an enclosed green, and in the centre a statue, erected in honour of one of the old royal governors, Berkeley, Lord Bowtetort. Whether from a desire to exhibit their anti-aristocratic sentiments, or from innate Vandalism, or from a childish wish to exhibit independence by doing mischief, the said statue is the pistol-mark for the students, who have exhibited their skill as marksmen by its total mutilation, in spite of all remonstrances from the authorities. The college was formerly surrounded by magnificent elms, but a few years since a blight came which destroyed every one of them, leaving the building in a desert-like nakedness. The inn at Williamsburg is a miserable building, but it is kept by as kind-hearted, jolly old John-Bull-looking landlord as ever was seen, and who rejoices in the name of Uncle Ben. Meat is difficult to get at, as there are no butchers; the cream and butter are, however, both plentiful and excellent. The house is almost entirely overshadowed by one magnificent elm, which has fortunately escaped the blight that annihilated nearly all its fellows.

In front of the college, there’s a small green space, and in the center stands a statue dedicated to one of the old royal governors, Berkeley, Lord Bowtetort. Whether it’s out of a desire to show their anti-aristocratic feelings, some sort of inherent vandalism, or just a childish urge to express independence through mischief, this statue has become a target for the students, who have demonstrated their marksmanship by completely destroying it, despite repeated warnings from the authorities. The college used to be surrounded by beautiful elm trees, but a blight a few years ago wiped them all out, leaving the building bare and desolate. The inn in Williamsburg is a rundown place, but it’s run by a cheerful, kind-hearted landlord who looks like a classic "John Bull" and goes by the name Uncle Ben. It’s hard to find meat there since there are no butchers, but the cream and butter are both abundant and top-quality. The house is almost entirely shaded by one magnificent elm tree that fortunately escaped the blight that took out nearly all of its neighbors.

After the hustle of most American cities, there was to me an unspeakable charm in the quiet of this place. Sitting at the inn-door, before you lies the open green, with its daisies and buttercups; horses and cattle are peaceably grazing; in the background are the remaining wings of the old palace; to your left stands the old village church, built with bricks brought from England, and long since mellowed by the hand of time, around which the clinging ivy throws the venerable mantle of its dark and massive foliage. Now, the summoning church-bell tolls its solemn note; school children, with merry laugh and light step, cross the common; the village is astir, and a human tide is setting towards its sacred portals: all, all speaks to the heart and to the imagination of happy days and happy scenes in a far-off land. You close your eyes, the better to realize the dream which fancy is painting. When they open upon the reality again, the illusion is dispelled by the sight of a brawny negro, with a grin on his face which threatens to split his ears, jogging merrily along the street with a huge piece of sturgeon for his Sunday feast. My friends, however, left me little time to indulge in a contemplative mood, for good old Madeira, a hearty welcome, and a stroll about and around the place, filled up the day; while the fragrant weed and the social circle occupied no small portion of the evening. Having spent a few but very pleasant days here, I took leave of my hospitable friends—not forgetting that jovial soul, Uncle Ben; then embarking in a steamer, and armed with a solitary letter of introduction, I started off to visit a plantation on the banks of James River.

After the hustle of most American cities, there was an indescribable charm in the quiet of this place. Sitting at the inn door, you can see the open green, with its daisies and buttercups; horses and cattle are peacefully grazing; in the background are the remaining wings of the old palace; to your left stands the old village church, built with bricks brought from England, now aged by time, around which the clinging ivy wraps its dark and thick foliage. Now, the church bell tolls its solemn note; school children, laughing and with light steps, cross the common; the village is bustling, and a stream of people is heading towards its sacred doors: everything speaks to the heart and imagination of happy days and scenes from a distant land. You close your eyes to better appreciate the dream that your imagination is painting. When you open them again to reality, the illusion is shattered by the sight of a muscular Black man, grinning widely as if his face might split, cheerfully walking down the street with a large piece of sturgeon for his Sunday dinner. My friends, however, didn't give me much time to get lost in thought because good old Madeira, a warm welcome, and a stroll around the area filled the day; while the pleasant smoke and the company occupied a good part of the evening. After spending a few very enjoyable days there, I said goodbye to my hospitable friends—not forgetting the jovial Uncle Ben; then boarded a steamer, armed with just one letter of introduction, and set off to visit a plantation on the banks of the James River.

A planter's home, like the good Highland laird's, seems made of India rubber. Without writing to inquire whether the house is full, or your company agreeable, you consider the former improbable and the latter certain. When you approach your victim, a signal is thrown out; the answer is a boat; in you get, bag and baggage; you land at the foot of his lawn or of some little adjoining pier, and thus apparently force yourself upon his hospitality. Reader, if it is ever your good fortune to be dropped with a letter of introduction at Shirley, one glance from the eye of the amiable host and hostess, accompanied by a real shake of the hand, satisfy you beyond doubt you are truly and heartily welcome. A planter's house on James River reminds one in many ways of the old country. The building is old, the bricks are of the brownest red, and in many places concealed by ivy of colonial birth; a few venerable monarchs of the forest throw their ample shade over the greensward, which slopes gently down to the water. The garden, the stables, the farm-yard, the old gates, the time-honoured hues of everything,—all is so different from the new facing and new painting which prevails throughout the North, that you feel you are among other elements; and if you go inside the house, the thoughts also turn homeward irresistibly as the eye wanders from object to object. The mahogany table and the old dining-room chairs, bright with that dark ebony polish of time which human ingenuity vainly endeavours to imitate; the solid bookcases, with their quaint gothic-windowly-arranged glass-doors, behind which, in calm and dusty repose, lie heavy patriarchal-looking tomes on the lower shelves, forming a sold basis above which to place lighter and less scholastic literature; an arm-chair, that might have held the invading Caesar, and must have been second-hand in the days of the conquering William; a carpet, over whose chequered face the great Raleigh might have strolled in deep contemplation; a rug, on whose surface generations of spinsters might have watched the purrings of their pet Toms or gazed on the glutinous eyes and inhaled the loaded breeze that came from the fat and fragrant Pug: whichever way the eye turned, whatever direction the imagination took, the conviction forced upon the mind was, that you were in an inheritance, and that what the wisdom and energy of one generation had gathered together, succeeding generations had not yet scattered to the winds by the withering blast of infinitesimal division. With the imagination thus forcibly filled with home and its associations, you involuntarily feel disposed to take a stroll on the lawn; but on reaching the door, your ears are assailed by wild shouts of infantine laughter, and, raising your eyes, you behold a dozen little black imps skylarking about in every direction, their fat faces, bright eyes, and sunny smiles beaming forth joyousness and health. Home and its varying visions fly at the sight, giving place to the reality that you are on a slave plantation. Of the slaves I shall say nothing here beyond the general fact that they appeared healthy, well fed, and well clothed on all the plantations I visited. Having enjoyed the hospitalities of Shirley for a few days, it was agreed that I should make a descent upon another property lower down the river. So, bidding adieu to my good friends at Shirley, I embarked once more on the steamer, and was landed at the pier of Brandon, in the most deluging rain imaginable. A walk of a quarter of a mile brought me to the door like a drowned rat, a note from my Shirley friends secured me an immediate and cordial welcome.

A planter's home, like a good Highland laird's, feels like it's made of India rubber. Without even asking if the house is full or if your company is welcome, you assume the former is unlikely and the latter is a given. When you get close to your host, a signal goes out; the response is a boat; you hop in with all your things; you arrive at the foot of their lawn or a nearby dock, and this seemingly forces you onto their hospitality. Reader, if you ever find yourself at Shirley with a letter of introduction, one look from the kind hosts, along with a genuine handshake, will reassure you that you are truly and warmly welcomed. A planter's house on James River in so many ways reminds you of the old country. The building is old, the bricks are a deep red, often hidden by colonial ivy; a few ancient trees provide ample shade over the grassy area that gently slopes down to the water. The garden, stables, barn, old gates, and the timeless colors of everything—it's all so different from the fresh facades and new paint that dominate the North, making you feel like you're in a different world. And if you step inside the house, your thoughts inevitably drift back home as your gaze wanders. The mahogany table and old dining chairs, shining with that rich, dark polish of age that human creativity can only try to replicate; solid bookcases with their uniquely arranged glass doors, behind which lie hefty, old-looking books on the lower shelves, serving as a strong foundation for lighter, less scholarly reads; an armchair that could have sat Julius Caesar, and must have been used long before the days of William the Conqueror; a carpet that the great Raleigh might have strolled across deep in thought; a rug, where generations of young women might have observed their playful cats or gazed at the chubby Pug and inhaled the warm, fragrant air it carried: no matter where you looked or what direction your imagination took, it became clear that you were in a cherished legacy, where the wisdom and energy of one generation hadn't yet been scattered to the winds by time's relentless division. With your mind filled with thoughts of home and its connections, you feel drawn to take a stroll on the lawn; but as you reach the door, you're hit with the loud, joyous sounds of children's laughter, and looking up, you see a dozen lively little kids playing everywhere, their round faces, bright eyes, and sunny smiles radiating happiness and health. Thoughts of home and its various memories vanish at the sight, replaced by the reality that you are on a slave plantation. I won't say much about the slaves here, other than the general observation that they appeared healthy, well-fed, and well-dressed on all the plantations I visited. After enjoying the hospitality of Shirley for a few days, it was decided that I should visit another property down the river. So, after saying goodbye to my kind friends at Shirley, I boarded the steamer once again and was dropped off at the pier of Brandon in the heaviest rain possible. A quarter-mile walk left me soaked, but a note from my Shirley friends ensured I received a warm and friendly welcome.

Brandon is perhaps the plantation which is more thoroughly kept up than any other on the James River, and which consequently has altered less. I am alluding now to the house and grounds about, not to the plantation at large; for I believe the proprietor at Shirley is reckoned A1 as a farmer. I have before alluded to the blight which destroyed so many fine elms on both shores of the James River. The withering insect appeared at Brandon; but the lady of the house soon proved that she knew the use of tobacco as well as the men, by turning a few hogsheads of the said weed into water, making thereby a murderous decoction, with which, by the intervention of a fire-engine, she utterly annihilated the countless hosts of the all-but invisible enemy, and thus saved some of the finest elms I ever saw in my life, under the shade of which the old family mansion had enjoyed shelter from many a summer's sun. Brandon is the only place I visited where the destroyer had not left marks of his ravages. The lawn is beautifully laid out, and in the style of one of our country villas of the olden time, giving every assurance of comfort and every feeling of repose. The tropical richness and brightness of leaf and flower added an inexpressible charm to them, as they stood out in bold relief against the pure and cloudless air around, so different from that indistinct outline which is but too common in our moist atmosphere. Then there was the graceful and weeping willow, the trembling aspen, the wild ivy, its white bloom tinged as with maiden's blush; the broad-leafed catalpa; the magnolia, rich in foliage and in flower; while scattered around were beds of bright and lovely colours. The extremes of this charming view were bounded, either by the venerable mansion over whose roof the patriarchal elms of which we have been speaking threw their cool and welcome shade, or by the broad stream whose bosom was ever and anon enlivened with some trim barque or rapid-gliding steamer, and whose farther shore was wooded to the water's edge. There is one of the finest China rose-trees here I ever beheld; it covers a space of forty feet square, being led over on trellis-work, and it might extend much beyond that distance: it is one mass of flowers every year. Unfortunately, I was a week too late to see it in its glory; but the withered flowers gave ample evidence how splendid it must have been.

Brandon is probably the best-maintained plantation on the James River and has changed the least over time. I'm talking about the house and its grounds, not the plantation as a whole; I believe the owner at Shirley is considered top-notch as a farmer. I’ve mentioned before the blight that wiped out so many beautiful elms along both banks of the James River. The destructive insect reached Brandon, but the lady of the house quickly showed she knew how to use tobacco just like the men by turning a few hogsheads of the stuff into water, creating a powerful concoction that she used to completely eliminate the countless tiny invaders with the help of a fire engine, thereby saving some of the finest elms I’ve ever seen, which had sheltered the old family mansion from many summer suns. Brandon is the only place I visited where the blight hadn’t left its marks. The lawn is beautifully landscaped in the style of our old country villas, providing every assurance of comfort and a sense of peace. The tropical richness and brightness of the leaves and flowers added an indescribable charm as they stood out sharply against the pure, cloudless sky, which is so different from the hazy outlines often seen in our humid weather. There were graceful weeping willows, trembling aspens, wild ivy with white blooms tinged like a maiden's blush, broad-leafed catalpas, the lush magnolia with its abundant foliage and flowers, and beds of bright, lovely colors scattered around. The charming scene was framed either by the historic mansion, over which the patriarchal elms cast their cool shade, or by the wide stream, which was periodically brightened by a sleek boat or a fast-gliding steamer, with its far shore lined with trees right to the water's edge. Here, I saw one of the finest China rose trees I’ve ever encountered; it covers a space of forty feet square, trained over a trellis, and it could spread even further. It’s a massive burst of flowers every year. Unfortunately, I arrived a week too late to see it at its peak, but the wilted flowers were clear evidence of how magnificent it must have been.

In one of my drives, I went to see an election which took place in the neighbourhood. The road for some distance lay through a forest full of magnificent timber; but, like most forest timber, that which gives it a marketable value destroys its picturesque effect. A few noble stems—however poor their heads—have a fine effect when surrounded by others which have had elbow-room; but a forest of stems, with Lilliputian heads—great though the girth of the stem may be—conveys rather the idea of Brobdingnagian piles driven in by giants, and exhibiting the last flickerings of vitality in a few puny sprouts at their summit. The underwood was enlivened by shrubs of every shade and hue, the wild flowering ivy predominating. The carriage-springs were tested by an occasional drop of the wheels into a pit-hole, on merging from which you came sometimes to a hundred yards of rut of dimensions similar to those of military approaches to a citadel; nevertheless, I enjoyed my drive excessively. The place of election was a romantic spot near a saw-mill, at the edge of what, in a gentleman's park in England, would be called a pretty little lake, styled in America a small pond. As each party arrived, the horse was hitched to the bough of some tree, and the company divided itself into various knots; a good deal of tobacco was expended in smoke and juice; there was little excitement; all were jolly and friendly; and, in short, the general scene conveyed the idea of a gathering together for field-preaching; but that was speedily replaced by the idea of a pleasant pic-nic of country farmers, as a dashing charge was made by the whole posse comitatus upon a long table which was placed under a fine old elm, and lay groaning beneath the weight of substantial meat and drink. As for drunkenness, they were all as sober as washerwomen. So much for a rural election-scene in Virginia.

On one of my drives, I went to check out an election that was happening nearby. The road for a while went through a forest full of amazing trees; but like most timber, the kind that has market value ruins its scenic beauty. A few impressive trunks—no matter how sparse their tops—look great when surrounded by others that have space to grow; but a forest filled with trunks that have tiny crowns—no matter how thick the trunk is—gives the impression of giant piles shoved into the ground, showing the last flickers of life in a few puny shoots at the top. The underbrush was lively with shrubs in every shade, with wild flowering ivy being the most dominant. The carriage springs got a workout every now and then as the wheels dropped into a pothole, and coming out sometimes meant navigating a rut that resembled the pathways made for an army approaching a fortress; still, I enjoyed my drive a lot. The election site was a picturesque spot near a sawmill, right by what would be called a nice little lake in an English park, but in America it's just a small pond. When each party arrived, they hitched their horse to the branch of a tree and divided into small groups; plenty of tobacco was consumed in smoke and spit; there was little excitement; everyone was cheerful and friendly; and overall, the scene felt like a gathering for field preaching; but that quickly shifted to the vibe of a pleasant picnic with local farmers as everyone made a dash toward a long table set up under a beautiful old elm, which was sagging under the weight of hearty food and drinks. As for drunkenness, they were all as sober as washerwomen. So much for a rural election scene in Virginia.

By way of making time pass agreeably, it was proposed to take a sail in a very nice yacht, called "The Breeze," which belonged to a neighbouring planter. We all embarked, in the cool of the evening, and the merry laugh would soon have told you the fair sex was fairly represented. Unfortunately, the night was so still that not a breath rippled the surface of the river, except as some inquisitive zephyr came curling along the stream, filling us with hope, and then, having satisfied its curiosity, suddenly disappeared, as though in mockery of our distress. The name of the yacht afforded ample field for punning, which was cruelly taken advantage of by all of us; and if our cruise was not a long one, at all events it was very pleasant, and full of fun and frolic. Pale Cinthia was throwing her soft and silvery light over the eastern horizon before we landed.

To pass the time more enjoyably, we decided to take a ride on a lovely yacht called "The Breeze," which belonged to a nearby planter. We all boarded in the cool of the evening, and the cheerful laughter quickly made it clear that the ladies were well represented. Unfortunately, the night was so still that not a single breath disturbed the surface of the river, except for an occasional curious breeze that drifted along the stream, filling us with hope, only to vanish abruptly as if to mock our disappointment. The name of the yacht provided plenty of opportunities for puns, which we all eagerly took advantage of; and while our cruise wasn't long, it was certainly enjoyable, filled with fun and laughter. The pale moon was casting its soft, silvery light over the eastern horizon by the time we landed.

Walking up the lawn, the scene was altogether lovely; the fine trees around were absolutely alive with myriads of fire-flies. These bright and living lights, darting to and fro 'mid the dark foliage, formed the most beautiful illumination imaginable—at one time clustering into a ball of glowing fire, at another streaking away in a line of lightning flame; then, bursting into countless sparks, they would for a moment disappear in the depths of their sombre bower, to come forth again in some more varied and more lovely form.

Walking up the lawn, the scene was completely beautiful; the tall trees surrounding were filled with countless fireflies. These bright, living lights flitted about among the dark leaves, creating the most stunning illumination you could imagine—sometimes gathering into a glowing ball of fire, other times zooming away in a flash of bright light; then, bursting into countless sparks, they would briefly vanish into the depths of their dark shelter, only to reappear in even more varied and beautiful shapes.

Pleasant indeed were the hours I passed here; lovely was the climate, beautiful was the landscape, hearty was the welcome: every day found some little plan prepared to make their hospitality more pleasant to the stranger; nature herself seemed to delight in aiding their efforts, for though I arrived in a deluge, I scarce ever saw a cloud afterwards. As the morning light stole through my open window in undimmed transparency, the robin, the blue-bird, the mocking-bird, the hosts of choral warblers, held their early oratorio in the patriarchal elms. If unskilled in music's science, they were unfettered by its laws, and hymned forth their wild and varied notes as though calling upon man to admire and adore the greatness and the goodness of his Maker, and to

The hours I spent here were truly enjoyable; the weather was delightful, the scenery was stunning, and the welcome was warm. Every day had some little plan set up to make their hospitality even nicer for guests. Nature seemed to join in, as I arrived in pouring rain but scarcely saw a cloud after that. When the morning light streamed through my open window in clear brightness, the robin, the bluebird, the mockingbird, and a chorus of songbirds put on their early performance in the ancient elms. Even if they didn’t understand the rules of music, they sang freely, their wild and varied melodies calling upon people to admire and appreciate the greatness and goodness of their Creator, and to

"Shake off laziness and wake up early,"

To pay his morning tribute.

If such were their appeal, it was not made in vain; for both morning and evening—both here and at Shirley—every member and visitor gathered round the family altar, the services of which were performed with equal cheerfulness and reverence. I felt as if I could have lingered on and on in this charming spot, and amid such warm hospitality, an indefinite period; it was indeed with sincere regret I was obliged to bid adieu to my agreeable hosts, and once more embark on board the steamer.

If that was their appeal, it wasn’t in vain; because both morning and evening—here and at Shirley—every family member and guest gathered around the family altar, with services done joyfully and respectfully. I felt like I could have stayed in this lovely place, enjoying such warm hospitality, for a long time; it was truly with genuine sadness that I had to say goodbye to my delightful hosts and board the steamer again.

The river James lacks entirely those features that give grandeur to scenery; the river, it is true, by its tortuous windings, every now and then presents a broad sheet of water; the banks are also prettily wooded; but there is a great sameness, and a total absence of that mountain scenery so indispensable to grandeur. The only thing that relieves the eye is a glimpse, from time to time, of some lovely spot like the one I have just been describing; but such charming villas, like angel's visits, are "few and far between." Here we are, at Norfolk. How different is this same Norfolk from the other eastern ports I have visited!--there all is bustle, activity, and increase,—here all is dreariness, desolation, and stagnation. It is, without exception, the most uninteresting town I ever set foot in; the only thing that gives it a semblance of vitality is its proximity to the dockyard, and the consequent appearance of officers in uniform; but in spite of this impression, which a two-days' residence confirmed me in, I was told, on good authority, that it is thriving and improving. By the statistics which our consul, Mr. James, was kind enough to furnish me, it appears that 1847 was the great year of its commercial activity, its imports in that year valuing 94,000l., and its exports 364,000l. In 1852, the imports were under 25,000l. and the exports a little more than 81,000l., which is certainly, by a comparison with the average of the ten years preceding, an evidence of decreasing, rather than increasing, commercial prosperity. Its population is 16,000; and that small number—when it is remembered that it is the port of entry for the great state of Virginia—is a strong argument against its asserted prosperity. Not long before my arrival they had been visited with a perfect deluge of rain, accompanied with a waterspout, which evidently had whirled up some of the ponds in the neighbourhood; for quantities of cat-fish fell during the storm, one of which, measuring ten inches, a friend told me he had himself picked up at a considerable distance from any water.

The James River completely lacks the features that create impressive scenery. It does twist and turn, occasionally revealing a wide stretch of water, and the banks are nicely wooded, but there’s a monotonous quality and a total lack of the mountain views that are essential for grandeur. The only thing that refreshes the sight is an occasional glimpse of a beautiful spot like the one I just described, but such charming villas, like angel's visits, are "few and far between." Here we are in Norfolk. How different this Norfolk is from the other eastern ports I've visited! There, everything is busy, lively, and growing—here, it’s all dreariness, desolation, and stagnation. Without a doubt, it’s the most boring town I’ve ever been to; the only thing that gives it a hint of life is its closeness to the dockyard and the presence of officers in uniform. Despite this impression, which my two-day stay confirmed, I was informed by reliable sources that it's actually thriving and improving. According to the statistics provided to me by our consul, Mr. James, 1847 was the peak year for its commercial activity, with imports valued at £94,000 and exports at £364,000. In 1852, however, imports were below £25,000 and exports just above £81,000, which certainly indicates a decline in commercial prosperity compared to the average of the previous ten years. Its population is 16,000, and that small number—especially considering it’s the entry point for the large state of Virginia—strongly argues against its claimed prosperity. Not long before I arrived, they experienced an overwhelming downpour of rain, accompanied by a waterspout, which clearly stirred up some of the nearby ponds; during the storm, many catfish fell from the sky, and a friend told me he had picked up one that was ten inches long from a considerable distance away from any water.

The only real object of interest at Norfolk is the dockyard, which of course I visited. Mr. James was kind enough to accompany me, and it is needless to say we were treated with the utmost courtesy, and every facility afforded us for seeing everything of interest, after which we enjoyed an excellent lunch at the superintendent's. They were building a splendid frigate, intended to carry 58-inch guns; her length was 250 feet, and her breadth of beam 48. Whether the manifest advantages of steam will induce them to change her into a screw frigate, I cannot say. The dockyard was very clean and the buildings airy. Steam, saw-mills, &c., were in full play, and anchors forging under Nasmyth's hammer, I found them making large masts of four pieces—one length and no scarfings—the root part of the tree forming the mast-head, and a very large air-hole running up and down the centre. The object of this air-hole is to allow the mast to season itself; the reader may remember that the mast of the "Black Maria" is made the same way. As far as I know, this is a plan we have not yet tried in our dockyards. I find that they use metallic boats far more than we do. I saw some that had returned after being four years in commission, which were perfectly sound. To say that I saw fine boats and spars here, would be like a traveller remarking he saw a great many coals at Newcastle. All waste wood not used in the yard is given away every Saturday to any old woman who will come and take it; and no searching of people employed in the dockyard is ever thought of. The cattle employed in and for the dockyard have a most splendid airy stable, and are kept as neat and clean as if in a drawing-room. Materials are abundant; but naturally there is little bustle and activity when compared to that which exists in a British yard. Their small navy can hardly find them enough work to keep their "hands in;" but doubtless the first knell of the accursed tocsin of war, while it gave them enough to do, would soon fill their dockyards with able and willing hands to do it. Commodore Ringold's surveying expedition, consisting of a corvette, schooner, steamer, &c., was fitting out for service, and most liberally and admirably were they supplied with all requisites and comforts for their important duties.

The only real point of interest in Norfolk is the dockyard, which I obviously visited. Mr. James was kind enough to join me, and it goes without saying that we were treated with the utmost courtesy, and we had every opportunity to see everything of interest. After that, we enjoyed a great lunch at the superintendent's. They were building a fantastic frigate designed to carry 58-inch guns; it measured 250 feet in length and had a beam width of 48 feet. Whether the clear advantages of steam will lead them to convert it into a screw frigate, I can't say. The dockyard was very clean, and the buildings were well-ventilated. Steam, sawmills, etc., were all in active use, and anchors were being forged under Nasmyth's hammer. I observed that they were making large masts from four pieces—one solid length without any scarf joints—the base of the tree forming the mast-head, with a large air-hole running up and down the center. The purpose of this air-hole is to allow the mast to season itself; you may recall that the mast of the "Black Maria" is made in the same manner. To the best of my knowledge, this is a technique we haven't yet adopted in our dockyards. I've noticed that they utilize metallic boats much more than we do. I saw some that had returned after four years in service and were still in perfect condition. To say I saw great boats and spars here would be like a traveler noting that there were plenty of coals in Newcastle. Every Saturday, all leftover wood not used in the yard is given away to any elderly woman who comes to take it, and there’s never any searching of people working in the dockyard. The animals used in and for the dockyard have a fantastic airy stable and are kept as neat and clean as if they were in a drawing-room. Materials are plentiful, but naturally, there's much less hustle and bustle compared to a British yard. Their small navy can hardly find enough work to keep their staff engaged; however, no doubt the first alarming sound of war would keep them busy and quickly fill their dockyards with capable and willing workers. Commodore Ringold's surveying expedition, which consists of a corvette, schooner, steamer, etc., was being prepared for service and was supplied generously and admirably with all the necessities and comforts for their important duties.

During my stay I enjoyed the kind hospitalities of our consul, Mr. G.P.E. James, who is so well known to the literary world. He was indulging the good people of Norfolk with lectures, which seem to be all the fashion with the Anglo-Saxon race wherever they are gathered together. The subject which I heard him treat of was "The Novelists," handling some favourites with severity and others with a gentler touch, and winding up with a glowing and just eulogy upon the author of My Novel. Altogether I spent a very pleasant hour and a half.

During my visit, I enjoyed the warm hospitality of our consul, Mr. G.P.E. James, who is well known in the literary world. He was entertaining the good people of Norfolk with lectures, which seem to be quite popular among the Anglo-Saxon community wherever they are gathered. The topic I heard him discuss was "The Novelists," where he critiqued some favorites harshly while treating others with a lighter hand, concluding with a glowing and fair tribute to the author of My Novel. Overall, I had a really enjoyable hour and a half.

I may here mention a regulation of the Foreign-office, which, however necessary it may be considered, every one must admit presses very hardly on British employés in the Slave States. I allude to the regulation by which officials are prevented from employing other people's slaves as their servants. White men soon earn enough money to be enabled to set up in some trade, business, or farm, and, as service is looked down upon, they seize the first opportunity of quitting it, even although their comforts may be diminished by the change. Free negroes won't serve, and the official must not employ a slave; thus, a gentleman sent out to look after the interest of his country, and in his own person to uphold its dignity, must either submit to the dictation and extortion of his white servant—if even then he can keep him—or he may be called upon suddenly, some fine morning, to do all the work of housemaid, John, cook, and knife and button boy, to the neglect of those duties he was appointed by his country to perform, unless he be a married man with a large family, in which case he may perhaps delegate to them the honourable occupations, above named. Surely there is something a little puritanical in the prohibition. To hold a slave is one thing, but to employ the labour of one who is a slave, and over whose hopes of freedom you have no control, is quite another thing; and I hold that, under the actual circumstances, the employment of another's slave could never he so distorted in argument as to bring home a charge of connivance in a system we so thoroughly repudiate.

I should mention a rule from the Foreign Office that, while it may be seen as necessary, everyone agrees it is quite tough on British officials in the Slave States. I'm referring to the rule that prevents officials from using other people's slaves as their servants. White men quickly make enough money to start their own trade, business, or farm, and since service is looked down upon, they jump at the first chance to leave it, even if it means sacrificing their comfort. Free black people won’t work as servants, and officials can’t hire a slave; so a gentleman who is sent out to represent his country and uphold its dignity must either put up with the demands and exploitation of his white servant—even if he can keep one—or he might suddenly find himself doing all the household chores, cooking, and running errands, neglecting the duties he was sent to carry out, unless he’s a married man with a large family, in which case he might pass off those tasks onto them. There’s definitely something a bit puritanical about this prohibition. Owning a slave is one thing, but employing the labor of someone who is a slave, over whose chances of freedom you have no control, is quite another. I believe that, given the current situation, using another's slave could never be twisted into an accusation of complicity in a system we completely reject.

Go to the East, follow in imagination your ambassadors, ministers, and consular authorities. Behold them on the most friendly terms—or striving to be so—with people in high places, who are but too often revelling in crimes, with the very name of which they would scorn even to pollute their lips; and I would ask, did such a monstrous absurdity ever enter into any one's head as to doubt from these amicable relations whether the Government of this country or its agents repudiated such abomination of abominations? If for political purposes you submit to this latter, while for commercial purposes you refuse to tolerate the former, surely you are straining at a black gnat while swallowing a beastly camel. Such, good people of the Foreign-office, is my decided view of the case; and if you profit by the hint, you will do what I believe no public body ever did yet. Perhaps, therefore, the idea of setting the fashion may possibly induce you to reconsider and rectify an absurdity, which, while no inconvenience to you, is often a very great one to those you employ. It is wonderful, the difference in the view taken of affairs by actors on the spot and spectators at a distance. A man who sees a fellow-creature half crushed to death and crippled for life by some horrible accident, is too often satisfied with little more than a passing "Good gracious!" but if, on his returning homeward, some gigantic waggon-wheel scrunch the mere tip of his toes, or annihilate a bare inch of his nose, his ideas of the reality of an accident become immensely enlarged.

Go to the East and imagine your ambassadors, ministers, and consular authorities. Picture them on friendly terms—or trying to be—with powerful people who too often indulge in crimes they wouldn't even dare mention. I have to ask, has anyone ever been so absurd as to doubt from these friendly interactions whether the government of this country or its agents reject such terrible acts? If, for political reasons, you accept this behavior, while refusing to tolerate it for commercial reasons, you’re missing the point completely. It’s like straining at a gnat while swallowing a camel. This, dear people at the Foreign Office, is my firm opinion; and if you take this hint, you might do something no public entity has done before. Perhaps the desire to set a good example will prompt you to reconsider and fix an absurdity that may not inconvenience you but often causes significant trouble for those you employ. It's amazing how differently people perceive events; those directly involved often see things differently than those watching from afar. A person who sees someone severely injured in an accident might only exclaim, "Good gracious!" But if that same person, on their way home, injures their toe or scratches their nose on a wagon wheel, their understanding of what an accident really means changes dramatically.

Let the Foreign Secretary try for a couple of days some such régime as the following:—

Let the Foreign Secretary try out a system like the following for a couple of days:—

5    A.M. Light the fires, get some water, and put the kettle on.  
6     "   Dust the room and make the beds.  
7     "   Clean the shoes, polish the knives, and sand the kitchen.  
7:30  "   Head to the market for dinner.  
8:30  "   Have breakfast.  
9     "   Go to Downing Street, light the fires, and dust the office.  
10    "   Sit down comfortably to work.  
1:30 P.M. Off to the coal hole for more coal.  
4     "   Sweep up and head home.  
5     "   Take off your coat, roll up your sleeves, and cook.  
6:30  "   Eat dinner.  
7     "   Wash up.  
8     "   Light your pipe, walk to the window, and see your colleague across the street, with a couple of Patagonian footmen bustling around amid a dozen guests, while, to heighten your sense of enjoyment, a couple of cheerful girls are peeking out of the attics and singing like crickets.  
9     "   Reflect on the government that confines you to personal servitude while allowing your colleague to have paid help. Sleep on it, and repeat the same routine on the second day; and, filled with the good feelings that gratitude brings, allow yourself to think it through and sleep on it again. On the third morning, let your heart and mind inspire a message about your thoughts to all public servants in slave-holding communities, and while rejecting slavery, you will find it easy to use the services of the slave, under certain conditions, and with appropriate restrictions.  

I embarked from Norfolk per steamer for Baltimore, and thence by rail through Philadelphia to New York. I took a day's hospitality among my kind friends at Baltimore. At Philadelphia I was in such a hurry to pass on, that I exhibited what I fear many will consider a symptom of inveterate bachelorship; but truth bids me not attempt to cloak my delinquency. Hear my confession:—

I left Norfolk by steamboat for Baltimore, and then took the train through Philadelphia to New York. I stayed for a day with my generous friends in Baltimore. In Philadelphia, I was in such a rush to move on that I showed what I worry many will see as a sign of being a lifelong bachelor; but I can't hide my wrongdoing. Here’s my confession:—

My friend Mr. Fisher, whose hospitality I had drawn most largely upon during my previous stay, invited me to come and pay him and his charming lady a visit, at a delightful country house of his a few miles out of town. Oh, no! that was impossible; my time was so limited; I had so much to see in the north and Canada. In vain he urged, with hearty warmth, that I should spend only one night: it was quite impossible—quite. That point being thoroughly settled, he said, "It is a great pity you are so pressed for time, because the trotting champion, 'Mac,' runs against a formidable antagonist, 'Tacony,' to-morrow." In half an hour I was in his waggon, and in an hour and a half I was enjoying the warm greeting of his amiable wife in their country-house, the blush of shame and a guilty conscience tinging my cheeks as each word of welcome passed from her lips or flashed from her speaking eyes. Why did I thus act? Could I say, in truth, "'Twas not that I love thee less, but that I love Tacony more?" Far from it. Was it that I was steeped in ingratitude? I trust not. Ladies, oh, ladies!--lovely creatures that you are—think not so harshly of a penitent bachelor. You have all read of one of your sex through whom Evil—which takes its name from, her—first came upon earth, and you know the motive power of that act was—curiosity. I plead guilty to that motive power on the present occasion; and, while throwing myself unreservedly on your clemency, I freely offer myself as a target for the censure of each one among you who, in the purity of truth can say, "I never felt such an influence in all my life." Reader, remember you cannot be one of these, for the simple fact of casting your eyes over this page affords sufficient presumptive evidence for any court of law to bring you in guilty of a curiosity to know what the writer has to say.—To resume.

My friend Mr. Fisher, whose hospitality I had relied upon during my last visit, invited me to come and see him and his lovely wife at his beautiful country house a few miles outside of town. Oh, no! That was impossible; my time was so limited; I had so much to explore in the north and Canada. Despite his warm insistence that I should spend just one night, it was absolutely impossible—simply out of the question. Once that was clearly established, he said, "It's too bad you're so busy because the trotting champion, 'Mac,' is racing against a tough competitor, 'Tacony,' tomorrow." In half an hour, I was in his wagon, and in an hour and a half, I was enjoying the warm welcome from his lovely wife at their country house, the blush of shame and guilt coloring my cheeks as each word of greeting came from her lips or gleamed in her expressive eyes. Why did I act like this? Could I honestly say, "It’s not that I love you less, but that I love Tacony more?" Not at all. Was it that I was steeped in ingratitude? I hope not. Ladies, oh, ladies!—lovely creatures that you are—don’t judge too harshly a remorseful bachelor. You've all read about one of your kind through whom Evil—named after her—first entered the world, and you know the driving force behind that act was—curiosity. I admit that I feel that same curiosity this time; and while I throw myself at your mercy, I’m ready to take the heat from anyone who can honestly say, "I’ve never felt that way in my life." Reader, keep in mind that you can’t be one of those people, because the very fact that you're reading this page is enough evidence for any court of law to find you guilty of wanting to know what the writer has to say.—To continue.

The race-course at Philadelphia is a road on a perfect level, and a circle of one mile; every stone is carefully removed, and it looks as smooth and clean as a swept floor. The stand commands a perfect view of the course; but its neglected appearance shows clearly that trotting-matches here are not as fashionable as they used to be, though far better attended than at New York. Upon the present occasion the excitement was intense; you could detect it even in the increased vigour with which the smoking and spitting was carried on. An antagonist had been found bold enough to measure speed with "Mac"—the great Mac who, while "Whipping creation," was also said never to have let out his full speed. He was thorough-bred, about fifteen and a half hands, and lighter built than my raw-boned friend Tacony, and he had lately been sold for 1600l. So sure did people apparently feel of Mac's easy victory, that even betting was out of the question. Unlike the Long Island affair, the riders appeared in jockey attire, and the whole thing was far better got up. Ladies, however, had long ceased to grace such scenes.

The racecourse in Philadelphia is perfectly level and a mile around; every stone is carefully removed, making it as smooth and clean as a freshly swept floor. The grandstand offers a great view of the track, but its run-down look clearly shows that trotting matches here aren't as trendy as they used to be, even though they attract more spectators than in New York. On this occasion, the excitement was high; you could feel it even in the intensified smoking and spitting. An opponent had been found who was bold enough to race against “Mac”—the renowned Mac who, while dominating the competition, was said to never have shown his full speed. He was thoroughbred, about fifteen and a half hands tall, and more slender than my gangly friend Tacony. He had recently sold for £1600. People seemed so sure of Mac's easy win that even betting was off the table. Unlike the Long Island event, the riders were dressed in jockey outfits, and the overall presentation was much better. However, ladies had long stopped attending these events.

Various false starts were made, all on the part of Mac, who, trusting to the bottom of blood, apparently endeavoured to ruffle Tacony's temper and weary him out a little. How futile were the efforts the sequel plainly showed. At length a start was effected, and away they went, Tacony with his hind legs as far apart as the centre arch of Westminster Bridge, and with strides that would almost clear the Bridgewater Canal. Mac's rider soon found that, in trying to ginger Tacony's temper, he had peppered his own horse's, for he broke-up into a gallop twice. Old Tacony and his rider had evidently got intimate since I had seen them at New York, and they now thoroughly understood each other. On he went, with giant strides; Mac fought bravely for the van, but could not get his nose beyond Tacony's saddle-girth at the winning-post—time, 2m. 25-1/2s.

Various false starts were made, all by Mac, who, relying on bloodlines, seemed to try to provoke Tacony's temper and wear him out a bit. How pointless those efforts turned out to be became clear in the end. Finally, they took off, with Tacony's hind legs spread wide like the center arch of Westminster Bridge, and strides that could nearly clear the Bridgewater Canal. Mac's rider soon realized that in trying to get Tacony riled up, he had actually agitated his own horse, as he broke into a gallop twice. Old Tacony and his rider had clearly gotten closer since I last saw them in New York, and they now understood each other perfectly. Off he went, striding like a giant; Mac fought hard for the lead but couldn’t get his nose past Tacony's saddle-girth at the finish line—time, 2m. 25-1/2s.

Then, followed the usual race-course accompaniments of cheers, squabbles, growling, laughing, betting, drinking, &c. The public were not convinced. Mac was still the favourite; the champion chaplet was not thus hastily to be plucked from his hitherto victorious brows. Half an hour's rest brought them again to the starting-post, where Mac repeated his old tactics, and with similar bad success. Nothing could ruffle Tacony, or produce one false step: he flew round the course, every stride like the ricochet of a 32lb. shot; his adversary broke-up again and again, losing both his temper and his place, and barely saved his distance, as the gallant Tacony—his rider with a slack rein, and patting him on the neck—reached the winning-post—time, 2m. 25s. The shouts were long and loud; such time had never been made before by fair trotting, and Tacony evidently could have done it in two, if not three seconds less. The fastest pacing ever accomplished before was 2m. 13s., and the fastest trotting 2m. 26s. The triumph was complete; Tacony nobly won the victorious garland; and as long as he and his rider go together, it will take, if not a rum 'un to look at, at all events a d----l to go, ere he be forced to resign his championship.

Then came the usual race-day atmosphere filled with cheers, arguments, grumbles, laughter, betting, drinking, etc. The crowd wasn't convinced. Mac was still the favorite; the champion title wasn't going to be easily taken from his previously victorious head. After half an hour of rest, they returned to the starting line, where Mac tried his old tactics again, with the same poor results. Nothing could shake Tacony or make him stumble: he raced around the track, every stride powerful like a 32-pound shot. His opponent kept falling apart, losing both his cool and his position, barely keeping up as the brave Tacony—his rider with a loose rein, patting him on the neck—crossed the finish line—time, 2m. 25s. The cheers were loud and long; that time had never been achieved before in fair trotting, and Tacony clearly could have done it in two, if not three seconds less. The fastest pace ever recorded before was 2m. 13s., and the fastest trot was 2m. 26s. The victory was complete; Tacony proudly won the champion's wreath, and as long as he and his rider are together, it will take, if not an impossible competitor to look at, at least a really tough one to beat, before he loses his title.

The race over, waggons on two wheels and waggons on four wheels, with trotters in them capable of going the mile in from 2m. 40s. to 3m. 20s., began to shoot about in every direction, and your ears were assailed on all sides with "G'lang, g'lang!" and occasionally a frantic yell, to which some Jehu would give utterance by way of making some horse that was passing him "break-up." Thus ended the famous race between Mac and Tac, which, by the way, gave me an opportunity of having a little fun with some of my American friends, as I condoled with them on their champion being beaten by a British subject; for, strange to say, Tac is a Canadian horse. I therefore of course expressed the charitable wish that an American horse might be found some day equal to the task of wearing the champion trotting crown(!)—I beg pardon, not crown, but, I suppose, cap of liberty. I need scarce say that it is not so much the horse as the perfect teaming that produces the result; and all Tac's training is exclusively American, and received in a place not very far from Philadelphia, from which he gets his name. A friend gave me a lift into Philadelphia, whence the iron horse speedily bore me to the great republican Babylon, New York.

The race was over, and the two-wheeled and four-wheeled wagons, with trotters capable of finishing a mile in 2 minutes 40 seconds to 3 minutes 20 seconds, started zooming off in every direction. Your ears were bombarded from all sides with "G'lang, g'lang!" and occasionally a frantic shout as someone yelled to nudge a passing horse to "break up." This marked the end of the famous race between Mac and Tac, which, by the way, gave me a chance to have some fun with my American friends as I sympathized with them about their champion being beaten by a British competitor; oddly enough, Tac is a Canadian horse. So, I naturally expressed the hope that someday an American horse would be found to match the challenge of wearing the champion trotting title(!)—I apologize, not title, but I guess, cap of liberty. I should mention that it’s not just the horse but the perfect pairing that brings about the result; and all of Tac's training is entirely American, done in a place not far from Philadelphia, which is how he got his name. A friend gave me a ride into Philadelphia, from where the iron horse quickly took me to the great republican city, New York.


CHAPTER XVI.

Home of the Pilgrim Fathers.




Having made the necessary preparations, I again put myself behind the boiling kettle, en route to the republican Athens. The day was intensely hot; even the natives required the windows open, and the dust being very lively, we soon became as powdered as a party going down to the Derby in the ante-railway days. My curiosity was excited on the way, by seeing a body of men looking like a regiment of fox-hunters—all well got up, fine stout fellows—who entered, and filled two of the carriages. On inquiring who kept the hounds, and if they had good runs, a sly smile stole across my friend's cheek as he told me they were merely the firemen of the city going to fraternize with the ditto ditto of Boston. It stupidly never occurred to me to ask him whether any provision was made in case of a quiet little fire developing itself during their absence, for their number was legion, and as active, daring, orderly-looking fellows as ever I set eyes upon. Jolly apopletic aldermen of our capital may forsake the green fat of their soup-making deity, to be feasted by their Parisian fraternity, without inconvenience to anybody, except it be to their fellow-passengers in the steamer upon their return, if they have been over-fed and have not tempest-tried organs of digestion. But a useful body like firemen migrating should, I confess, have suggested to me the propriety of asking what substitutes were left to perform, if need be, their useful duties; not having done so, I am constrained to leave this important point in its present painful obscurity.

Having done the necessary preparations, I found myself once again behind the boiling kettle, on my way to republican Athens. The day was scorchingly hot; even the locals had their windows open, and with the dust flying around, we quickly became as dusty as a group heading to the Derby in the days before the railway. My curiosity was piqued along the way when I saw a group of men who looked like a squad of fox-hunters—all dressed well, strong-looking guys—who boarded and filled two of the carriages. When I asked who handled the hounds and if they had good runs, a sly smile appeared on my friend's face as he told me they were just the city firemen heading to join their counterparts in Boston. It completely slipped my mind to ask him if any arrangements had been made in case a small fire broke out during their absence, considering they were a sizable group and looked as active, bold, and orderly as anyone I'd ever seen. Jolly, overweight aldermen from our capital can leave their soup-making duties to be treated by their Parisian counterparts without causing inconvenience to anyone, except perhaps to their fellow passengers on the steamer upon their return, if they’ve overindulged and don't have robust digestive systems. But a group like the firemen migrating should have made me think to ask what substitutes were left to handle, if necessary, their important responsibilities. Since I didn’t, I’m left to leave this significant point in its current troubling obscurity.

A thundering whistle and a cloud of steam announce the top is off the kettle, and that we have reached Boston. Wishing to take my own luggage in a hackney, I found that, however valuable for security the ticketing system may be, it was, under circumstances like mine at present, painfully trying to patience. In three-quarters of an hour, however, I managed to get hold of it, and then, by way of improving my temper, I ascertained that one of my boxes was in a state of "pretty considerable all mighty smash." At last I got off with my goods and chattels, and having seen quite enough of the American palace-hotels and their bountifully-spread tables, and of the unrivalled energy with which the meals are despatched; remembering, also, how frequently the drum of my ears had been distracted by the eternal rattling and crackling of plates and dishes for a couple of hundred people, and how my olfactories had suffered from the mixed odours of the kitchen produce, I declined going to the palatial Revere House, which is one of the best hotels in the Union, and put up at a house of less pretensions, where I found both quiet and comfort.

A loud whistle and a puff of steam signal that the kettle is off, and we have arrived in Boston. Wanting to take my own luggage in a cab, I found that while the ticketing system may be useful for security, it was incredibly frustrating under my current circumstances. After about forty-five minutes, I finally managed to get my luggage, only to discover that one of my boxes was in a “pretty considerable all mighty smash.” Eventually, I got away with my things, and having seen more than enough of the grand American hotels and their overflowing buffets, not to mention the unmatched speed at which the meals are served, I also remembered how often I had been distracted by the constant clattering of plates and dishes for a couple of hundred guests, and how I had suffered from the mixed smells coming from the kitchen. So, I decided against staying at the luxurious Revere House, which is one of the best hotels in the country, and instead opted for a less extravagant place where I found both peace and comfort.

To write a description of Boston, when so many others have done so far better than I can pretend to do, and when voluminous gazetteers record almost every particular, would be drawing most unreasonably upon the patience of a reader, and might further be considered as inferring a doubt of his acquaintance with, I might almost say, a hackneyed subject. I shall, therefore, only inflict a few short observations to refresh his memory. The most striking feature in Boston, to my mind, is the common or park, inasmuch as it is the only piece of ground in or attached to any city which I saw deserving the name of a park. It was originally a town cow-pasture, and called the Tower Fields. The size is about fifty acres; it is surrounded with an iron fencing, and, although not large, the lay of the ground is very pretty. It contains some very fine old trees, which every traveller in America must know are a great rarity in the neighbourhood of any populous town. It is overlooked by the State-house, which is built upon Beacon Hill, just outside the highest extremity of the park, and from the top of which a splendid panoramic view of the whole town and neighbourhood is obtained. The State-house is a fine building in itself, and contains one of Chantrey's best works—the statue of Washington. The most interesting building in Boston, to the Americans, is, undoubtedly, Faneuil Hall, called also the "Cradle of Liberty." Within those walls the stern oratory of noble hearts striving to be free, and daring to strike for it, was listened to by thousands, in whose breasts a ready response was found, and who, catching the glowing enthusiasm of the orators, determined rather to be rebels and free than subjects and slaves: the sequel is matter of history.

To describe Boston, when so many others have done it much better than I could hope to, and when detailed guidebooks cover almost every aspect, would be asking too much of a reader's patience and might suggest I doubt their familiarity with a well-worn topic. So, I'll just share a few brief thoughts to jog their memory. The most striking feature of Boston, in my opinion, is the common or park, as it's the only area in or around any city I’ve seen that truly deserves the name park. It used to be a town cow pasture, called the Tower Fields. It's about fifty acres, surrounded by an iron fence, and while it’s not large, the layout is quite lovely. It has some really beautiful old trees, which, as every traveler in America knows, are quite rare near busy towns. The park is overlooked by the State House, which sits on Beacon Hill, just outside the park’s highest point, and from the top, you can get a fantastic panoramic view of the whole town and its surroundings. The State House is a beautiful building in its own right and houses one of Chantrey's best sculptures—the statue of Washington. The most interesting building in Boston for Americans is undoubtedly Faneuil Hall, also known as the "Cradle of Liberty." Within those walls, the passionate speeches of brave people fighting for freedom were heard by thousands, who felt an immediate connection and were inspired to choose rebellion and freedom over being subjects and slaves: the rest is history.

I shall not tax the temper of my reader by going through any further list of the public buildings, which are sufficiently known to those who take an interest in this flourishing community; but I must hasten to apologize for my ingratitude in not sooner acknowledging that most pleasing feature in every traveller's experience in America, which, I need hardly say, is hospitality.

I won't bore my reader by listing more of the public buildings, which are well-known to anyone interested in this thriving community; however, I must quickly apologize for my lack of gratitude in not acknowledging earlier one of the most enjoyable aspects of every traveler’s experience in America, which, I must say, is hospitality.

Scarce was my half-smashed box landed at the hotel, when my young American friend, who came from England with our party, appeared to welcome me—perhaps to atone for the lion's share of champagne he had enjoyed at our table on board the steamer. Then he introduced me to another, and another introduced me to another another, and another another introduced me to another another another, and so on, till I began to feel I must know the élite of Boston. Club-doors flew open, champagne-corks flew out, cicerones, pedal and vehicular, were ever ready to guide me by day and feed me by night; and though there are no drones in a Yankee hive, so thoroughly did they dedicate themselves to my comfort and amusement, that a person ignorant of the true state of things might have fancied they were as idle and occupationless as the cigar-puffers who adorn some of our metropolitan-club steps, the envy of passing butcher-boys and the liberal distributors of cigar-ends to unwashed youths who hang about ready to pounce upon the delicious and rejected morsels. Among other gentlemen whose acquaintance I had the pleasure of making, and whose hospitalities, of course, I enjoyed, I may mention Mr. Prescott and Mr. Ticknor, the former highly appreciated in the old country, and both so widely known and so justly esteemed in the world of literature. As I consider such men public property, I make no apology for using their names, while in so doing I feel I am best conveying to the reader some idea of the society which a traveller meets with in Yankee Athens.

My barely intact luggage had just arrived at the hotel when my young American friend, who had come from England with our group, showed up to greet me—maybe to make up for the large amount of champagne he had enjoyed at our table on the steamer. Then he introduced me to one person after another until I started to feel like I was meeting the elite of Boston. Club doors swung open, champagne corks popped, and guides, both on foot and in vehicles, were always ready to lead me during the day and feed me at night; even though there are no slackers in a Yankee hive, they dedicated themselves to my comfort and entertainment so thoroughly that an outsider might have thought they were as idle as the cigar smokers lounging at some of our city clubs, envied by passing butchers and always ready to share their leftover cigars with dirty kids hanging around, eager to grab the tasty remnants. Among the gentlemen I was lucky to meet and whose hospitality I naturally enjoyed, I should mention Mr. Prescott and Mr. Ticknor, the former highly regarded in the old country, and both widely known and justly respected in the literary world. I consider such men public figures, so I don’t feel the need to apologize for mentioning their names; doing so gives the reader a better sense of the society a traveler encounters in Yankee Athens.

The town has one charm to me, which it shares in common with Baltimore. Not only is it built on undulating ground, but there are old parts remaining, whereby the eye is relieved from the tiring monotony of broad and straight streets, while the newer parts form a pleasing variety, and bear gratifying evidence of the increasing wealth of its intelligent and industrious population. Then, again, the neighbourhood of the town has a charm for a wanderer from the old country; the roads are excellent, the fields and gardens are tidied up, creepers are led up the cottage walls, suburban villas abound, everything looks more clean, more soigné, more snug, more filled and settled than the neighbourhood of any other city I visited in America, and thus forces back upon the mind associations and reflections of dear old home.

The town has one appeal for me, which it shares with Baltimore. Not only is it built on rolling hills, but there are older areas that provide a break from the tiring monotony of wide, straight streets, while the newer sections add a nice variety and show the growing wealth of its smart and hardworking population. Additionally, the surroundings of the town have a special charm for someone coming from the old country; the roads are great, the fields and gardens are well-kept, vines climb up the cottage walls, there are plenty of suburban homes, and everything looks cleaner, more polished, cozier, and more established than the neighborhoods of any other city I've visited in America, which brings back memories and feelings of dear old home.

Having enjoyed a visit to a friend in one of the suburban villas inland, to which he drove me in his light waggon, another vehicular cicerone insisted that I should drive out to his uncle's, and spend a day at his marine villa, about twelve miles distant. I joyfully assented to so pleasant a proposition, and, "hitching a three-forty before a light waggon"—as the term is in America—we were soon bowling away merrily along a capital road. A pleasant drive of nine miles brought us to a little town called Lynn, after Lynn Regis in England, from which place some of the early settlers came. How often has the traveller to regret the annihilation of the wild old Indian names, and the substitution of appellatives from every creek and corner of the older continents; with Poquanum, Sagamore, Wenepoykin, with Susquehanna, Wyoming, Miami, and a thousand other such of every length and sound, all cut-and-dried to hand, it is more than a pity to see so great a country plagiarizing in such a wholesale manner Pekins, Cantons, Turing, Troys, Carmels, Emmauses, Cairos, and a myriad other such borrowed plumes, plucked from Europe, Asia, and Africa, and hustled higgledy-piggledy side by side, without a single element or association to justify the uncalled-for robbery.

After visiting a friend in one of the suburban villas inland, who took me there in his light wagon, another driver urged me to visit his uncle's marine villa about twelve miles away. I happily agreed to this enjoyable suggestion, and "hitching up a three-forty in front of a light wagon"—as the term goes in America—we were soon merrily cruising down a great road. A lovely nine-mile drive brought us to a small town called Lynn, named after Lynn Regis in England, from which some of the early settlers came. How often travelers lament the disappearance of the wild old Native American names, replaced by names borrowed from every nook and cranny of the older continents. With names like Poquanum, Sagamore, Wenepoykin, along with Susquehanna, Wyoming, Miami, and countless others of varying length and sound, it's truly unfortunate to see such a vast country mimicking the likes of Pekins, Cantons, Turing, Troys, Carmels, Emmauses, Cairos, and a myriad of other borrowed names, taken from Europe, Asia, and Africa, all jumbled together without a single element or connection to justify this unwarranted appropriation.

Forgive me, reader,—all this digression comes from my wishing Lynn had kept its old Indian name of Saugus; from such little acorns will such great oak-trees spring.—To resume. The said town of Lynn supplies understandings to a very respectable number of human beings, and may be called a gigantic shoemaker's shop, everything being on the gigantic scale in America. It employs 11,000, out of its total population of 14,000, in that trade, and produces annually nearly 5,000,000 of women's and children's boots, shoes, and gaiters, investing in the business a capital amounting to 250,000l. Moses and Son, Hyam and Co., Nicoll and Co., and the whole of the three-halfpence-a-shirt-paying capitalists, can show nothing like my shoemakers' shop, "fix it how you will,"—as they say in the Great Republic.

Forgive me, reader—this whole sidetrack comes from my wish that Lynn had kept its original Indian name, Saugus; from such small beginnings can come such great results. To get back on track. The town of Lynn supports a significant number of people and can be described as a massive shoemaker's workshop, as everything is on a grand scale in America. It employs 11,000 out of its total population of 14,000 in that industry and produces nearly 5,000,000 pairs of women's and children's boots, shoes, and gaiters every year, investing about 250,000l into the business. Moses and Son, Hyam and Co., Nicoll and Co., and all the others who pay three halfpence a shirt can't compare to my shoemaker's shop, "fix it how you will," as they say in the Great Republic.

The three-forty trotter soon left boots, shoes, and all behind, and deposited us at the door of the uncle's villa, where a friendly hand welcomed us to its hospitalities. It was very prettily situated upon a cliff overlooking Massachusetts Bay, in which said cliff a zigzag stepway was cut down to the water, for the convenience of bathing. The grounds were nicely laid out and planted, and promised in time to be well wooded, if the ocean breeze driving upon them did not lay an embargo upon their growth, in the same heartless manner as it does upon the west coast of Scotland, where, the moment a tree gets higher than a mop handle, its top becomes curved over by the gales, with the same graceful sweep as that which a successful stable-boy gives a birch broom after a day's soaking. I hope, for my hospitable friend's sake, it may not prove true in his case; but I saw an ostrich-feathery curve upon the tops of some of his trees, which looked ominous. Having spent a very pleasant day, and enjoyed good cheer and good company, Three-forty was again "hitched to;" joined hands announced the parting moment had arrived; wreaths of smoke from fragrant Havanas ascended like incense from the shrine of Adieu; "G'lang"—the note of advance—was sounded; Three-forty sprang to the word of command; friends, shoes, and shoemakers were soon tailed of; and ere long your humble servant was nestling his nose in his pillow at Boston.

The three-forty trotter quickly left our boots and shoes behind and dropped us off at the door of my uncle's villa, where a friendly hand welcomed us with open arms. It was beautifully situated on a cliff overlooking Massachusetts Bay, where a zigzag staircase was carved into the cliff for easy access to the water for bathing. The grounds were nicely landscaped and planted, and they promised to be well wooded over time, unless the ocean breeze, which blows against them unmercifully, stunted their growth like it does along the west coast of Scotland. There, the moment a tree grows taller than a mop handle, the wind bends its top over in a graceful curve reminiscent of how a skilled stable-boy sweeps a birch broom after a day of getting it wet. I hope for my hospitable friend's sake that this isn't true for him, but I did notice a bit of that ostrich-feather-like curve at the tops of some of his trees, which seemed like a bad sign. After spending a very pleasant day and enjoying good food and great company, Three-forty was hitched up again; joined hands signaled that it was time to part ways; wisps of smoke from fragrant Havanas rose like incense from the altar of Goodbye; "G'lang"—the advance signal—was sounded; Three-forty sprang into action; soon, friends, shoes, and shoemakers faded away; and before long, I was comfortably nestled into my pillow in Boston.

Hearing that the drama was investing its talent in Abolitionism, I went one evening to the theatre, to see if I could extract as much fun from the metropolis of a free state as I had previously obtained from the capital of slave-holding Maryland; for I knew the Americans, both North and South, were as ticklish as young ladies. I found very much the same style of thing as at Baltimore, except that her abolitionist highness, the Duchess of Southernblack, did not appear on the stage by deputy; but as an atonement for the omission, you had a genuine Yankee abolitionist; poor Uncle Tom and his fraternity were duly licked and bullied by a couple of heartless Southern nigger-drivers; and while their victims were writhing in agony, a genuine abolitionist comes on the stage and whops the two nigger-drivers, amid shouts of applause. The suppliant Southerners, midst sobs and tears, plead for mercy, and in vain, until the happy thought occurs to one of them, to break forth into a wondrous tale of the atrocities inflicted upon the starving and naked slaves of English mines and factories, proving by contrast the superior happiness of the nigger and the greater mercifulness of his treatment. The indignant abolitionist drops the upraised cowhide, the sobs and tears of the Southerners cease, the whole house thunders forth the ecstasy of its delight, the curtain drops, and the enchanted audience adjourn to the oyster saloons, vividly impressed with British brutality, the charms of slavery, and the superiority of Abolitionism.

Hearing that the show was putting its talent into Abolitionism, I decided to go to the theater one evening to see if I could have as much fun in this free state as I had before in the slave-holding capital of Maryland; after all, I knew that Americans, North and South, were just as sensitive as young ladies. I found pretty much the same kind of thing as in Baltimore, except that the abolitionist lady, the Duchess of Southernblack, didn’t make an appearance by proxy; but as compensation for that, there was a real Yankee abolitionist; poor Uncle Tom and his fellow sufferers were properly beaten and tormented by a couple of ruthless Southern slave drivers; and while their victims were squirming in pain, an actual abolitionist came on stage and hit the two slave drivers, earning loud applause. The pleading Southerners, amidst sobs and tears, begged for mercy, but to no avail, until one of them came up with a brilliant idea to tell a shocking story about the atrocities faced by the starving and naked slaves in British mines and factories, highlighting the better happiness of the slaves and the kinder treatment they received. The outraged abolitionist dropped the raised whip, the crying and sobbing of the Southerners stopped, the whole audience erupted in delight, the curtain fell, and the captivated audience headed to the oyster bars, deeply moved by British cruelty, the benefits of slavery, and the superiority of Abolitionism.

How strange, that in a country like this, boasting of its education, and certainly with every facility for its prosecution—how strange, that in the very Athens of the Republic, the deluded masses should exhibit as complete ignorance as you could find in the gallery of any twopenny-halfpenny metropolitan theatre of the old country!

How strange that in a country like this, proud of its education and clearly having every opportunity for it, the misguided masses can show such complete ignorance as you'd find in the audience of any cheap metropolitan theater back in the old country!

Another of the lions of Boston which I determined to witness, if possible, was "spirit-rapping." A friend undertook the arrangement for me; but so fully were the hours of the exhibitor taken up, that it was five days before we could obtain a spare hour. At length the time arrived, and, fortified with a good dinner and a skinful of "Mumm Cabinet," we proceeded to the witch's den. The witch was a clean and decent-looking girl about twenty, rather thin, and apparently very exhausted; gradually a party of ten assembled, and we gathered round the witch's table. The majority were ladies—those adorers of the marvellous! The names of friends were called for; the ladies took the alphabet, and running over it with the point of a pencil, the spirit rapped as the wished-for letter was reached. John Davis was soon spelt, each letter probably having been indicated by the tremulous touch of affectionate hope. Harriet Mercer was then rapped out by the obliging spirit. The pencil and the alphabet were then handed to me, and the spirit being asked if it would answer my inquiries, and a most satisfactory "Yes" being rapped out, I proceeded to put its powers to the test. I concentrated my thoughts upon a Mr. L---- and his shop in Fleet-street, with both of which being thoroughly familiar I had no difficulty in fixing my attention upon them. The pencil was put in motion, powerful rappings were heard as it touched the D. I kept my gravity, and went on again and again, till the name of the illustrious duke, whose death the civilized world was then deploring with every token of respect, was fully spelt out. The witch was in despair; she tried again and again to summon the rebellious spirit, but it would not come. At last, a gentleman present, and who evidently was an habitué of the witch's den, proposed that the refractory spirit should be asked if any of the company were objectionable to it. This being done, a rattling "Yes" came forth, upon which each person asked in succession, "Am I objectionable to you?" There was a dead silence until it came to my friend and myself, to each of whom it gave a most rappingly emphatic "Yes." Accordingly, we rose and left the field to those whose greater gullibility rendered them more plastic objects for working upon. Never in my life did I witness greater humbug; and yet so intense was the anxiety of the Boston public to witness the miracle, that during all the day and half the night the spirit was being invoked by the witch, into whose pockets were pouring the dollars of thousands of greater gabies than myself, for many went away believers, receiving the first germs of impressions which led them to a Lunatic Asylum, or an early grave, as various statistics in America prove most painfully.

Another thing happening in Boston that I wanted to see, if possible, was "spirit-rapping." A friend arranged it for me, but the exhibitor's schedule was so booked that it took us five days to secure a free hour. Finally, the time came, and after a nice dinner and a good amount of "Mumm Cabinet," we went to the witch's place. The witch was a tidy-looking girl about twenty, quite thin, and seemingly very tired. Gradually, a group of ten people gathered, and we circled around the witch's table. Most of us were women—those fans of the extraordinary! They called out names of friends; the ladies took a pencil and went through the alphabet, and the spirit would rap whenever the desired letter was reached. John Davis was spelled out quickly, with each letter likely indicated by a hopeful touch. Then, Harriet Mercer was also rapped out by the helpful spirit. They handed me the pencil and alphabet, and after confirming that the spirit would answer my questions with an enthusiastic "Yes" rapped out, I began to test its abilities. I focused my thoughts on a Mr. L---- and his shop on Fleet Street, both of which I knew well, so I had no trouble concentrating. The pencil started moving, and loud raps were heard as it made contact with the D. I maintained my composure and continued again and again until the name of the famous duke, whose death the civilized world was mourning with utmost respect, was completely spelled out. The witch was in despair; she tried repeatedly to call the stubborn spirit, but it wouldn't come. Eventually, a gentleman there, who clearly was a regular at the witch's place, suggested asking the difficult spirit if any of the attendees were bothersome to it. Once this was done, a rattling "Yes" came forth, prompting each person to ask in turn, "Am I bothersome to you?" There was complete silence until it reached my friend and me; to each, it emphatically responded with a "Yes." So, we got up and left the scene for those whose greater gullibility made them easier to influence. Never in my life have I seen a bigger charade; yet the Boston public's eagerness to witness the miracle was so strong that all day and half the night, the witch invoked the spirit, filling her pockets with dollars from thousands more gullible than me, as many left as believers, planting the seeds of ideas that later led them to a mental institution or an early grave, as various statistics in America sadly demonstrate.

To show the extent to which belief in these absurdities goes, I subjoin an extract from a paper, by which it appears that even the solemnities of a funeral cannot sober the minds of their deluded followers. Mr. Calvin R. Brown—better known as the husband of Mrs. Anne L. Fish, a famous "spirit medium" in New York—having died, we read the following notice of the funeral:—"After prayer, the Rev. S. Brittan delivered an address, in which he dwelt with much earnestness upon the superiority of the life of the spirit, as compared with that of the body. At various points in his address there were rappings, sometimes apparently on the bottom of the coffin, and at others upon the floor, as if in response to the sentiments uttered. After concluding his address, Professor Brittan read a communication purporting to have come from the deceased after his entrance into the spirit world. While it was being read, the reporter states that the rappings were distinctly heard. Several friends then sang, "Come, ye disconsolate," after which the Rev. Mr. Denning made a few remarks, during which the rappings were more audible than before. Other ceremonies closed the funeral. The whole party, preachers, physicians, and all, were spiritualists," &c.

To show just how far belief in these absurd ideas goes, I’ll share an excerpt from a paper that shows even a funeral can’t sober the minds of their misguided followers. Mr. Calvin R. Brown—better known as the husband of Mrs. Anne L. Fish, a famous "spirit medium" in New York—passed away, and we read the following notice of the funeral: "After a prayer, Rev. S. Brittan gave a speech where he passionately talked about the superiority of the spirit's life compared to that of the body. At various times during his speech, there were knocks, sometimes seemingly on the bottom of the coffin, and at other times on the floor, as if responding to what he was saying. After finishing his speech, Professor Brittan read a message that was claimed to be from the deceased after entering the spirit world. While it was being read, the reporter noted that the knocks were clearly heard. Several friends then sang, 'Come, ye disconsolate,' followed by a few remarks from Rev. Mr. Denning, during which the knocks were louder than before. Other ceremonies wrapped up the funeral. The whole group—preachers, doctors, and everyone else—were spiritualists," &c.

But I have before me a letter written by Judge Edmonds, which is a more painful exemplification of the insanity superinduced by giving way to these absurdities; in that document you will find him deliberately stating, that he saw heavy tables flying about without touch, like the leaves in autumn; bells walking off shelves and ringing themselves, &c. Also, you will find him classing among his co-believers "Doctors, lawyers, clergymen, a Protestant bishop, a learned and reverend president of a college, judges of higher courts, members of congress, foreign ambassadors (I hope not Mr. Crampton), and ex-members of the United States Senate."

But I have a letter from Judge Edmonds in front of me, which is a more painful example of the insanity caused by indulging in these absurdities. In that document, you’ll find him deliberately stating that he saw heavy tables flying around without being touched, like leaves in autumn; bells walking off shelves and ringing themselves, etc. You’ll also see him including among his fellow believers "Doctors, lawyers, clergy, a Protestant bishop, a respected and learned president of a college, judges of higher courts, members of Congress, foreign ambassadors (I hope not Mr. Crampton), and former members of the United States Senate."

The ladies of the old country will, no doubt, be astonished to hear that their sisters of the younger country have medical colleges in various States; but, I believe, mostly in the northern ones. To what extent their studies in the healing art are carried, I cannot precisely inform them; it most probably will not stop at combinations of salts and senna, or spreading plasters—for which previous nursery practice with bread and butter might eminently qualify them. How deeply they will dive into the mysteries of anatomy, unravelling the tangled web of veins and arteries, and mastering the intricacies of the ganglionic centre; or how far they will practise the subjugation of their feelings, whether only enough to whip off some pet finger and darling little toe, or whether sufficiently to perform more important operations, even such as Sydney Smith declared a courageous little prime minister was ready to undertake at a minute's notice; these are questions which I cannot answer: but one thing is clear, the wedge is entered. How far it will be driven in, time must show.[AK]

The ladies from the old country will surely be surprised to hear that their sisters in the younger country have medical colleges in several states, mostly in the northern ones. I can't say exactly how far their studies in medicine go; it likely won't just involve combinations of salts and senna or applying plasters—skills they might have learned from previous experience with bread and butter. It's unclear how deeply they'll explore the mysteries of anatomy, untangling the complex network of veins and arteries, or mastering the details of the nervous system; or how much they will suppress their emotions, whether just enough to remove a favorite finger or a beloved little toe, or enough to take on more significant surgeries, like the ones Sydney Smith mentioned that a brave little prime minister was ready to tackle at a moment’s notice. These are questions I can’t answer, but one thing is certain: the door has been opened. How far it will go remains to be seen.[AK]


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

The Massachusetts Legislature, in a recent session, appropriated funds to the New England Female Medical College, located in Boston, to pay forty students for five years; and I have since observed in a Boston paper that there are twenty lady physicians, who, confining themselves to midwifery and diseases of their own sex, have a fair practice, and enjoy the confidence of the families they visit.



CHAPTER XVII.

Teaching of Youth, and a Model Jail.




I must now turn to a more important and interesting feature of Boston, viz., education. We all remember how the religious persecution in the reign of Elizabeth, fettering men's consciences, drove a devoted band of deep-thinking Christians into caves of concealment, and how, after much peril, they escaped in 1609, in the reign of James the First, to Amsterdam, under the leadership of the noble-hearted J. Robinson, where, after sighing long for a return beneath the flag of the country of their birth, they obtained a charter from the Virginia Company. The first division of them embarked on board "The Mayflower," a small vessel of 180 tons, and sailed from Plymouth, 6th September, 1620, landing in their new and barren home upon the 11th of December. These were the sturdy champions of liberty of conscience, from whom the New Englanders may be said to have sprung, and who have leavened the whole community with their energy and indomitable spirit: such men knew how to appreciate education, as the leveller of oppression and the bulwark of freedom; and it is, therefore, no wonder that the American Republic recognises them as the worthy pioneers of that noble feature in their institutions—free education, supplied to all by the State.

I now want to focus on a more important and interesting aspect of Boston: education. We all remember how the religious persecution during Elizabeth's reign restricted people's beliefs, pushing a dedicated group of thoughtful Christians into hiding. After facing many dangers, they escaped in 1609 during James the First's reign to Amsterdam, led by the noble J. Robinson. After longing to return to their homeland, they received a charter from the Virginia Company. The first group boarded "The Mayflower," a small ship of 180 tons, and set sail from Plymouth on September 6, 1620, landing in their new, barren home on December 11. These were the strong advocates for freedom of conscience, from whom New Englanders can trace their roots, and who infused the entire community with their energy and unwavering spirit. These individuals understood the value of education as a tool against oppression and a safeguard for freedom; it’s no surprise that the American Republic honors them as the true pioneers of an essential aspect of their system—free education provided to all by the State.

Let us, then, see how far their descendants are treading in their footsteps upon this point. I speak of Boston and its 150,000 inhabitants, not of the State. And first, it is important to observe, that the strict provisions of the State requirements would be met by three schools, and three teachers with assistants, whose salaries would amount to 900l. The actual provision made by this energetic community, is,—Schools: 1 Latin, 1 English, 22 grammar, 194 primary,—total for salaries, 37,000l. And that it may not be supposed the salaries are great prizes, it is important to remark, that there are 65 male teachers, and about 300 female teachers. The highest paid are head-masters of Latin and English schools, 490l.; sub-masters of same, and head-masters of grammar, 300l.; ushers, assistants, &c., from 50l. to 160l.; and female teachers, from 45l. to 60l., with 5l. additional for care of the rooms.

Let’s see how far their descendants are following in their footsteps on this issue. I’m talking about Boston and its 150,000 residents, not the entire State. First, it’s important to note that the strict requirements of the State could be met with three schools and three teachers with assistants, whose salaries would total 900l. The actual provision made by this active community is: 1 Latin school, 1 English school, 22 grammar schools, and 194 primary schools—totaling salaries of 37,000l. And to clarify that the salaries aren’t high prizes, it’s worth mentioning that there are 65 male teachers and about 300 female teachers. The highest salaries go to the headmasters of the Latin and English schools at 490l; deputy masters of those schools and headmasters of grammar schools earn 300l; ushers, assistants, etc., make between 50l and 160l; and female teachers earn between 45l and 60l, with an extra 5l for taking care of the classrooms.

All the primary schools have female teachers; and the feeling is strongly in favour of females for instructing the very young, their patience and kindness being less likely to foster feelings of dread and dislike.

All the elementary schools have female teachers, and there’s a strong preference for women to teach young children, as their patience and kindness are less likely to create feelings of fear and dislike.

The total amount of taxes raised in the city is, in round numbers, 250,000l.; of which 65,000l., or more than one-fourth, is devoted to schools. The total value of all public school estates of Boston, up to May, 1851, was 260,000l.; and the salary of the head-master is, within a few pounds, equal to that of the governor of the State.

The total amount of taxes collected in the city is, roughly, £250,000; of which £65,000, or over one-fourth, is dedicated to schools. The total value of all public school properties in Boston, as of May 1851, was £260,000; and the salary of the headmaster is, within a few pounds, comparable to that of the State governor.

Say, then, reader, has some portion of the spirit of the Pilgrim Fathers descended to the present generation, or not?—a population of 150,000 devoting 260,000l. to education.

Say, then, reader, has some part of the spirit of the Pilgrim Fathers come down to the current generation, or not?—a population of 150,000 dedicating 260,000l to education.

Wherever parents are unable to provide books, &c., the children are supplied with the use of them gratis. All corporal punishment is strongly discouraged, but not prohibited; and all inflictions thereof are recorded for the information of the Visiting Board. Having omitted to make personal inquiries on the spot, I obtained, through the kindness of Mr. Ticknor, answers to the following questions on the point of religious instruction:—

Wherever parents can’t provide books, etc., the children can use them for free. All physical punishment is strongly discouraged, but not banned; and all instances of it are recorded for the Visiting Board's information. Since I didn't make personal inquiries on-site, I got answers to the following questions about religious instruction thanks to Mr. Ticknor:—

1. "Are the pupils at your normal schools obliged to receive religious instruction from some minister, and to attend some place of worship; or may they, if they prefer, receive no such instruction, and attend no church?"

1. "Are students at your regular schools required to receive religious instruction from a minister and attend a place of worship, or can they choose not to receive such instruction and not go to church if they prefer?"

"The State has put the normal schools under the charge of the Board of Education, with no special law or instructions. The Board of Education endeavours to act on exactly the same principles as those which the law has laid down with respect to the common schools. The Board requires that the pupils of the normal schools attend some place of worship, the pupil making his own choice. These schools are opened every morning with reading the Scriptures, singing, and prayer. The moral conduct of the pupils is carefully watched over, and instruction is given in respect to the best methods of training the young in religion and morals. The religious teaching is ethical, not doctrinal."

"The state has placed normal schools under the oversight of the Board of Education, without any specific laws or guidelines. The Board of Education strives to follow the same principles that the law establishes for public schools. They require students at the normal schools to attend a place of worship of their choice. Each morning, the schools begin with Scripture readings, singing, and prayer. The moral behavior of the students is closely monitored, and guidance is provided on the best ways to teach young people about religion and ethics. The religious instruction is ethical rather than doctrinal."

2. "Are the children at your common schools obliged to receive some religious instruction, or if their parents express a wish they should not receive any at school, is the wish complied with?"

2. "Are the children at your public schools required to get some religious instruction, or if their parents request that they not receive any at school, is that request honored?"

"The law requires all teachers to instruct their pupils 'in the principles of piety,' and forbids any sectarian books to be introduced into the public schools. The school committees of each town prescribe the class-books to be used, and commonly make the Bible one of those books. The teacher is expected to follow the law in respect to teaching the principles of piety, without any instruction from the school committee, and is almost always allowed to do this in his own way, unless he is guilty of some impropriety, in which case the school committee interferes. He usually has devotional exercises at the opening of the school, and reads the Scriptures, or causes them to be read, as an act of worship, whether they are prescribed by the committee or not. Many teachers take that occasion to remark upon topics of morality, and thereby aim to prevent misconduct. Indeed, the Bible is much relied on as a means of discipline rather for preventing wrong-doing, than for correcting it.

"The law requires all teachers to instruct their students 'in the principles of piety' and prohibits the introduction of any sectarian books into public schools. The school committees in each town decide which textbooks will be used, and they often include the Bible among those texts. Teachers are expected to adhere to the law regarding the teaching of piety principles without specific guidance from the school committee, and they are generally allowed to do this in their own way unless they engage in some inappropriate behavior, in which case the committee steps in. Typically, teachers start the school day with devotional exercises and read the Scriptures, or have them read, as a form of worship, regardless of whether they are mandated by the committee. Many teachers use this time to discuss moral topics in an effort to discourage misconduct. In fact, the Bible is often seen as a tool for discipline aimed at preventing wrongdoing rather than just correcting it."

"No minister, as such, gives religious instruction in any of our public schools. Ministers are commonly on the school committees, and when visiting the schools, as committees, exhort the children to good behaviour, and to a religious life.

"No minister, as such, provides religious instruction in any of our public schools. Ministers often serve on the school committees, and when they visit the schools in that capacity, they encourage the children to behave well and to live a religious life."

"No cases are known of parents wishing their children to be excused from such religious instruction, except with the Catholics, who desire that their children be excused from the devotional exercises, especially from reading the Protestant version of the Bible. Even this is very rare where the teacher himself reads the Scriptures in connexion with other devotional exercises. It occurs most frequently where the children are required to use the Bible themselves, either in devotional exercises or in a reading lesson. But those wishes are not often regarded, because the committee has a legal right to prescribe the Bible as a school-book, and to require all the pupils to comply with all the regulations of the school. In some few instances, committees have thought it expedient to allow the Douay version to be used by Catholic children; but it amounts to nothing, as it is an abstract point started by the priests, for which parents care but little; besides, it is objected that the Douay version with its glosses is 'a sectarian book,' whereas the common English version without note or comment is not."

"No cases are known of parents wanting their children to be excused from religious instruction, except among Catholics, who want their kids to avoid devotional exercises, especially reading the Protestant version of the Bible. Even this is really rare when the teacher reads the Scriptures along with other devotional activities. It happens most often when students are asked to use the Bible themselves, either in devotional activities or reading lessons. But those requests are usually ignored because the committee has the legal right to require the Bible as a school text and to insist that all students follow the school’s rules. In a few cases, committees have decided it’s reasonable to let Catholic children use the Douay version; however, this doesn’t change much, as it’s a minor issue raised by the priests that parents don’t care about much. Additionally, it's argued that the Douay version with its notes is 'a sectarian book,' while the common English version without notes is not."

Scholars desirous of entering the higher schools are generally required to pass through the lower, and bring therefrom certificates of capacity and conduct. In the statute of the State, with reference to education, all professors, tutors, instructors, &c., are enjoined to impress upon the minds of those committed to their charge "the principles of piety, justice, a sacred regard to truth, and love of their country." Among the various subjects in connexion with education, in which instruction is given in these schools, it may be as well to mention one, which, I believe, is all but totally neglected in England. By legislative enactment, section 2, "All school-teachers shall hereafter be examined in their knowledge of the elementary principles of physiology and hygiène, and their ability to give instructions in the same."

Students wishing to enter higher education are usually required to go through lower schools and provide certificates of their abilities and behavior. According to the state education law, all professors, tutors, instructors, etc., are tasked with instilling in their students "the principles of piety, justice, a strong commitment to truth, and love for their country." Among the many subjects taught in these schools, it’s worth mentioning one that is almost entirely overlooked in England. By law, section 2, "All school teachers must now be evaluated on their knowledge of the basic principles of physiology and hygiene, as well as their ability to teach these subjects."

The School Committee consists of two members from each of the twelve wards of the city, chosen annually, and assisted by the Mayor and President of the Common Council. The average expense of each scholar at the primary schools is 25s. per annum, at the higher schools three guineas. Under the foregoing system, 12,000 children are instructed annually at the primary schools, and 10,000 at the higher schools, which aggregate of 22,000 will give an attendance of nearly 70 per cent. upon all children between the ages of five and fifteen, to whom the avenues of knowledge, from the lisping letters of infancy to the highest branches of philosophy, are freely opened.

The School Committee is made up of two members from each of the twelve city wards, elected every year, and supported by the Mayor and the President of the Common Council. The average cost for each student in primary schools is 25s a year, while for higher schools it's three guineas. With this system in place, 12,000 children are educated each year in primary schools and 10,000 in higher schools, totaling 22,000, which means nearly 70 percent of all children between the ages of five and fifteen have access to learning, from the basics of reading to advanced topics in philosophy.

Through the kindness of Mr. B. Seaver, the Mayor of Boston, I was enabled to visit several of these schools, the cleanliness of which, as well as their good ventilation, was most satisfactory. The plan adopted here, of having the stools made of iron and screwed on to the floor, with a wooden seat fixed on the top for each pupil, and a separate desk for every two, struck me as admirably calculated to improve ventilation and check sky-larking and noise. The number of public schools in the whole State is 4056, which are open for seven months and a half in the year, and the average attendance of scholars is 145,000; besides which, there are 749 private schools, with 16,000 scholars. It is a curious fact, and bears strong testimony to the efficiency of the public schools, that while they have increased by 69 during the year, the private schools have decreased by 36. The foregoing sketch is from the official Reports, printed at Boston in 1853.

Through the kindness of Mr. B. Seaver, the Mayor of Boston, I was able to visit several of these schools, which were impressively clean and well-ventilated. The setup they use, with iron stools screwed to the floor and a wooden seat on top for each student, along with a separate desk for every two students, seems very effective for improving airflow and reducing mischief and noise. There are a total of 4,056 public schools in the state, which are open for seven and a half months a year, with an average attendance of 145,000 students. Additionally, there are 749 private schools with 16,000 students. It's interesting to note, and it strongly highlights the effectiveness of the public schools, that while they increased by 69 this year, the private schools decreased by 36. The above information is drawn from the official reports published in Boston in 1853.

In addition to these schools, there are four colleges, three theological seminaries, and two medical schools. Of these I shall only notice one of the colleges, which I visited, and which enjoys a high reputation—viz., Harvard College, or Cambridge, as it is sometimes called, from the village where it is situated. The history of this college is a wholesome proof how a small institution, if duly fostered by a nation, may eventually repay future generations with liberal interest. Established in 1636, by a vote of 400l., it obtained the name of Harvard, from the bequeathment by a reverend gentleman of that name, A.D. 1638, of the sum of 780l. and 300 volumes. Its property now amounts to upwards of 100,000l., and it is divided into five departments—collegiate, law, medical, theological, and scientific—affording education to 652 students, of whom one half are undergraduates. There are forty-five instructors, all men of unquestionable attainments, and capable of leading the students up to the highest steps of every branch of knowledge; the necessary expenses of a student are about 45l. a year; the fee for a master of arts, including the diploma, is 1l. sterling.

In addition to these schools, there are four colleges, three theological seminaries, and two medical schools. I will only mention one of the colleges that I visited, which has a great reputation—Harvard College, or Cambridge, as it’s sometimes called, named after the village where it’s located. The history of this college proves how a small institution, when properly supported by a nation, can ultimately benefit future generations significantly. Established in 1636, by a vote of 400 pounds, it was named Harvard after a reverend gentleman who bequeathed 780 pounds and 300 books in 1638. Its current property value exceeds 100,000 pounds and it is divided into five departments—collegiate, law, medical, theological, and scientific—providing education to 652 students, half of whom are undergraduates. There are forty-five instructors, all highly qualified and capable of guiding students to the highest levels of every field of knowledge; the necessary expenses for a student are about 45 pounds a year; the fee for a master of arts, including the diploma, is 1 pound sterling.

Meritorious students, whose circumstances require it, are allowed, at the discretion of the Faculty, to be absent for thirteen weeks, including the winter vacation, for the purpose of teaching schools. Parents who think their sons unable to take care of their own money, may send it to a patron duly appointed by the college, who will then pay all bills and keep the accounts, receiving, as compensation two and a half per cent. I think the expenses of this establishment will astonish those who have had to "pay the piper" for a smart young man at Oxford, as much as the said young man would have been astonished, had his allowance, while there, been paid into the hands of some prudent and trusty patron. Tandems and tin horns would have been rather at a discount—cum pluribus aliis.

Students with outstanding abilities, who need it, can be absent for thirteen weeks, including the winter break, to teach in schools, with the Faculty's approval. Parents who feel their sons can't manage their own money can send it to a designated patron chosen by the college, who will handle all expenses and keep the accounts, receiving a fee of two and a half percent. I believe the costs of this institution will surprise those who have had to "foot the bill" for a bright young man at Oxford, just as that young man would have been surprised if his allowance had been managed by a careful and trustworthy patron while he was there. Extravagant spending and flashy displays would likely be less common—cum pluribus aliis.

The college has a look of antiquity, which is particularly pleasant in a land where almost everything is spick-and-span new; but the rooms I thought low and stuffy, and the walls and passages had a neglected plaster-broken appearance. There are some very fine old trees in the green, which, throwing their shade over the time-worn building, help to give it a venerable appearance. A new school of science has just been built by the liberality of Mr. Lawrence,[AL] late Minister of the United States in this country; and I may add that the wealth and prosperity of the college are almost entirely due to private liberality.

The college has an old-fashioned charm, which is especially nice in a place where nearly everything is shiny and new; however, I found the rooms to be low and stuffy, and the walls and halls looked a bit run-down with broken plaster. There are some really beautiful old trees in the green area that cast shade over the weathered building, giving it a respectable look. A new science school has just been built thanks to the generosity of Mr. Lawrence,[AL] the former Minister of the United States here; and I should mention that the college's wealth and success are largely thanks to private donations.

As the phonetic system of education has been made a subject of so much discussion in the United States, I make no apology for inserting the following lengthy observations thereon. A joint committee on education, appointed to inquire into its merits by the Senate, in 1851, reported that there was evidence tending to show—"That it will enable the pupil to learn to read phonetically in one-tenth of the time ordinarily employed. That it will enable the learner to read the common type in one-fourth of the time necessary according to the usual mode of instruction. That its acquisition leads the pupil to the correct pronunciation of every word. That it will present to the missionary a superior alphabet for the representation of hitherto unwritten languages," &c. A similar committee, to whom the question was referred by the House of Representatives in 1852, state that during the past year the system had been tried in twelve public schools, and that, according to the testimony of the teachers, children evinced greater attachment to their books, and learnt to read with comparative ease; and they conclude their report in these words:—"Impressed with the importance of the phonetic system, which, if primarily learnt, according to the testimony presented, would save two years of time to each of the two hundred thousand children in the State, the committee would recommend to school committees and teachers, the introduction of the phonetic system of instruction into all the primary schools of the State, for the purpose of teaching the reading and spelling of the common orthography, with an enunciation which can rarely be secured by the usual method, and with a saving of time and labour to both teachers and pupils, which will enable the latter to advance in physical and moral education alone until they are six years of age, without any permanent loss in the information they will ultimately obtain."

As the phonetic education system has been widely discussed in the United States, I have no hesitation in including the following detailed observations on the topic. A joint committee on education, appointed by the Senate to explore its benefits in 1851, reported that there was evidence suggesting—"It will help students learn to read phonetically in one-tenth of the time typically required. It will allow learners to read the common type in one-fourth of the usual instructional time. Its use leads students to correctly pronounce every word. It will provide missionaries with a better alphabet for representing previously unwritten languages," etc. A similar committee, to whom this question was referred by the House of Representatives in 1852, stated that over the past year, the system had been tested in twelve public schools, and, according to teachers' reports, children showed greater enthusiasm for their books and learned to read with relative ease. They concluded their report with these statements:—"Recognizing the significance of the phonetic system, which, if learned initially, according to the presented testimony, would save two years for each of the two hundred thousand children in the State, the committee recommends that school committees and teachers implement the phonetic system of instruction in all primary schools in the State to teach reading and spelling of the common orthography, with a pronunciation that the usual method rarely achieves, and with a saving of time and effort for both teachers and students, allowing the latter to focus solely on physical and moral education until they are six years old, without any lasting loss of the knowledge they will eventually acquire."

One gentleman of the minority of the committee sent in a very strong report condemning the system. He declares "the system is nothing but an absurd attempt to mystify and perplex a subject, which ought to be left plain and clear to the common apprehensions of common men." Further on he states, "No human ingenuity can show a reason for believing that the way to learn the true alphabet, is first to study a false alphabet; that the way to speak words rightly, is to begin by spelling them wrong; that the way to teach the right use of a letter, is to begin by giving a false account of a letter. Yet the phonetic system, so far as it is anything, is precisely this." Then, again, with reference to the eight specimen scholars, taken from a school of fifty, and who were exhibited, he observes, "they were the same as those who were examined a year ago; nothing is said of the other forty-two. It is not necessary to say anything more of the character of such evidence as this;" and he winds up by observing: "Such a mode of instruction would, in his opinion, waste both the time and the labour employed upon it, and complicate and embarrass a study, which in its true shape is perfectly simple and clear." The following old anecdote would rather tend to prove that spelling and reading were not either "simple or clear" to a Lancashire judge, who, having asked the name of a witness, and not catching the word exactly, desired him to spell it, which he proceeded to do thus:—"O double T, I double U, E double L, double U, double O, D." The learned judge laid down his pen in astonishment, and after two or three unsuccessful efforts, at last declared he was unable to record it—so puzzled was he with the "simple" spelling of that clear name—Ottiwell Wood.

One member of the minority on the committee submitted a very strong report criticizing the system. He asserts, "the system is nothing more than a ridiculous attempt to confuse and complicate a topic that should be straightforward and easy for the average person to understand." He continues, "No amount of human creativity can justify the idea that the path to learning the true alphabet is to first study a false alphabet; that the way to pronounce words correctly is to start by spelling them incorrectly; that teaching the proper use of a letter begins with giving a misleading description of that letter. Yet, the phonetic system, as far as it has any substance, is exactly that." Furthermore, regarding the eight sample students chosen from a school of fifty who were displayed, he notes, "they are the same as those who were tested a year ago; nothing is mentioned about the other forty-two. It is unnecessary to elaborate on the quality of such evidence;" and he concludes by stating: "In his view, this method of instruction would waste both the time and effort invested in it and complicate a subject that, when approached correctly, is completely straightforward and simple." The following old anecdote would suggest that spelling and reading were neither "simple nor clear" to a Lancashire judge, who, after asking a witness for their name and not quite hearing it, requested that he spell it out, which he proceeded to do as follows: "O double T, I double U, E double L, double U, double O, D." The surprised judge put down his pen in astonishment and, after two or three failed attempts, finally declared he was unable to record it—so baffled was he by the "simple" spelling of that clear name—Ottiwell Wood.

In the Massachusetts Teacher of January, 1853, there is the report of a committee, in which they state "that children taught solely by the phonetic system, and only twenty minutes each day, outstripped all their compeers." They further add, that "the phonetic system, thus beneficial in its effects, has been introduced into one hundred and nineteen public and five private schools, and that they have reason to believe, that no committee ever appointed to examine its merits have ever reported adverse to it;" and they conclude by strongly "recommending teachers to test the merits of the System by actual trial in their schools." Then again, in the following number of their journal, they strongly condemn the system as both useless and impracticable.

In the Massachusetts Teacher from January 1853, there's a report from a committee stating that "children taught exclusively through the phonetic system, for only twenty minutes a day, surpassed all their peers." They also note that "this phonetic system, which has proven to be beneficial, has been implemented in one hundred nineteen public schools and five private schools, and they believe that no committee appointed to assess its effectiveness has ever reported negatively on it;" and they conclude by strongly "encouraging teachers to evaluate the System’s merits through practical application in their schools." However, in the next issue of their journal, they strongly criticize the system as both ineffective and impractical.

Having carefully weighed the arguments on both sides, I am led to the conclusion, that the objections of those who condemn the system are partly owing to the fact, that while reaching their present advanced state of knowledge, they have entirely forgotten their own struggles, and are thus insensibly led to overlook the confusion and difficulty which must ever arise in the infant mind, where similar combinations produce similar sounds. An infant mind is incapable of grasping differences, but understands readily simple facts; if what meets the eye represent a certain fixed sound, the infant readily acquires that sound; but if the eye rest on o, u, g, h, as a combination, and the endeavour is made to teach him the endless varieties of sound produced thereby, his little mind becomes puzzled, his ideas of truth become confused, his memory becomes distrusted, and his powers of reading become retarded by the time occupied in the—to him—most uninteresting task of learning a host of unmeaning sounds. The inevitable consequence is that the poor little victim becomes disheartened, rendering a considerable amount of additional trouble and—which is far more difficult to find—patience necessary upon the part of the teacher.

Having carefully considered the arguments on both sides, I've come to the conclusion that the objections raised by those who criticize the system are partly due to the fact that, in reaching their current advanced level of knowledge, they've completely forgotten their own struggles. As a result, they tend to overlook the confusion and difficulty that will always arise in a young child's mind when similar combinations create similar sounds. A young mind can't grasp differences but does understand simple facts. If what they see represents a specific sound, they easily pick up that sound. However, if they look at o, u, g, h, as a combination, and there's an attempt to teach them the endless varieties of sounds that come from it, the child gets confused. Their understanding of truth becomes muddled, their memory becomes unreliable, and their reading skills are delayed by the time spent on what is, for them, the very uninteresting job of learning a bunch of meaningless sounds. The unfortunate result is that the poor child feels discouraged, making it necessary for the teacher to put in a lot more effort and, even harder to find, patience.

Common sense points out, that the reading of phonetic words must be more easily learnt than the reading of the aphonetic words, of which our language is essentially composed. The real question is simply this,—Does the infant mind advance with such rapidity under phonetic teaching, as to enable it at a certain age to transfer its powers to orthodox orthography, and reach a given point of knowledge therein, with less trouble, and in a shorter space of time, than those infants do who are educated upon the old system? If phonetic teaching has this effect, it is an inestimable boon, and if not, it is a complete humbug. [AM] It should also be borne in mind, that the same arguments which hold good in the case of infants will apply also, in a great degree, to adults who wish to learn to read, and to foreigners commencing the study of our language. Whether any further use of phonetics is either desirable or practicable, would be a discussion out of place in these pages.

Common sense suggests that it's easier to learn to read phonetic words than to read the non-phonetic words that make up our language. The real question is simply this: Does the infant mind progress quickly enough with phonetic teaching to enable it, at a certain age, to switch to conventional spelling and achieve a certain level of knowledge in it with less effort and in a shorter time than infants taught with the old system? If phonetic teaching produces this effect, it’s an invaluable advantage; if not, it’s completely pointless. [AM] It's also important to remember that the same arguments that apply to infants largely apply to adults wanting to learn to read and to foreigners starting to learn our language. Whether any further use of phonetics is desirable or feasible is a discussion that doesn't belong in these pages.

When any startling novelty is proposed, enthusiasts carry their advocacy of it so far as often to injure the cause they wish to serve: on the other hand, too many of the educated portion of the community are so strenuously opposed to innovation, as to raise difficulties rather than remove them. Has not the common sense of the age been long calling for changes in the law of partnership, divorce, &c., and is not some difficulty always arising? Has not the commercial world been crying aloud for decimal coinage and decimal weights and measures, and are not educated men constantly finding some objections, and will they not continue to do so, until some giant mind springs up able to grasp the herculean task, and force the boon upon the community? Were not steamboats and railways long opposed as being little better than insane visions? Did not Doctor Lardner prove to demonstration that railway carriages could never go more than twenty miles an hour, owing to the laws of resistance, friction, &c., and did not Brunel take the breath out of him, and the pith out of his arguments, by carrying the learned demonstrator with him on a locomotive, and whisking him ten miles out of London in as many minutes? When I see that among so intelligent and practical a people as the New Englanders—a people whose thoughts and energies are so largely devoted to education—one hundred and nineteen schools have adopted the phonetic system, I cannot but look back to the infancy of steam, and conclude, that there must be more advantages in that system than its opponents seem disposed to allow it to possess.

When a surprising idea is introduced, supporters often go overboard in their enthusiasm, harming the very cause they aim to promote. Conversely, many educated people are so resistant to change that they create more obstacles than they solve. Hasn't common sense in our times been advocating for changes in laws about partnerships, divorce, etc., only for new challenges to arise? Haven't people in business been loudly asking for decimal currency and decimal weights and measures, while educated individuals keep finding objections, and won’t they keep doing this until a visionary emerges who can tackle the monumental task and push these changes through? Weren't steamboats and railways once dismissed as little more than crazy fantasies? Didn't Dr. Lardner prove that trains couldn’t exceed twenty miles per hour due to resistance and friction, only for Brunel to counter that by taking him on a train and zooming ten miles out of London in just ten minutes? When I see that in an intelligent and practical community like New England, where so much thought and energy goes into education, one hundred and nineteen schools have adopted the phonetic system, I can’t help but reflect on the early days of steam power and conclude that there must be more benefits to this system than its critics are willing to acknowledge.

The Committee of Council on Education in England, to whom the funds set apart for educational purposes are, intrusted, authorized the printing of phonetic books for schools some years since; but authorizing books without training masters to teach them, is about as useful as putting engines into a ship, without supplying engineers to work them. Besides which, their phonetic system was in itself confusing and objectionable; they have also informed the public, that the system, in various forms, is almost universally adopted in the elementary schools of Holland, Prussia, and Germany.[AN]

The Council Committee on Education in England, which is responsible for the funds designated for educational purposes, approved the printing of phonetic books for schools a few years ago. However, permitting the publication of these books without training teachers to use them is nearly as effective as equipping a ship with engines but not providing engineers to operate them. Additionally, their phonetic system was confusing and problematic on its own. They also informed the public that this system, in various forms, is nearly universally used in elementary schools in Holland, Prussia, and Germany.[AN]

I should also mention that other systems have been tried both in England and Scotland, and that those teachers who employ them speak highly of their advantages, especially in the latter country. I have now a paper before me, called The Reading Reformer, in which I find the following sentence, which tends to show that the system is approved of in France in the highest quarters:—"The phonetic method of primary instruction is used in the 5th regiment of the line, the 12th Light, the Penitentiary of St. Germain, and the House of Correction for young prisoners. The Minister of War has ordered that French should be taught by this method to the young Arabs, in the three schools of Algiers, Oran, and Philipville."

I should also mention that other systems have been tried in both England and Scotland, and those teachers who use them speak very highly of their benefits, especially in Scotland. I currently have a paper in front of me called The Reading Reformer, which includes the following sentence that suggests the system is recognized in France at the highest levels:—"The phonetic method of primary instruction is used in the 5th regiment of the line, the 12th Light, the Penitentiary of St. Germain, and the House of Correction for young prisoners. The Minister of War has ordered that French should be taught using this method to the young Arabs in the three schools of Algiers, Oran, and Philipville."

One great mistake has been made by the champions of this mode of teaching, which is more fatal to its success, in my opinion, than any difficulty raised by its opponents, and that is the adoption by each champion of his own phonetic alphabet; and for which he claims a superiority over the alphabets of others. The absurdity of this perpetual strife must be palpable. If a Fireworshipper were to be converted, what hopes of success would there be if a Mormonite and a Mussulman were placed on one side of him, and a Free Kirk man and a Jesuit on the other? The public, as regards phonetic teaching, are precisely in that Fireworshipper's position. Reader, you must form your own opinion: I offer none. And now, with your permission, we will quit the region of speculation and return to sober fact.

One significant mistake has been made by the supporters of this teaching method, which, in my view, is more damaging to its success than any challenges posed by its critics. This mistake is each supporter using their own phonetic alphabet and claiming it’s superior to others. The ridiculousness of this constant conflict should be obvious. If a Fireworshipper were to convert, how successful would it be if a Mormon and a Muslim were on one side and a Free Kirk follower and a Jesuit were on the other? The public, in terms of phonetic teaching, is exactly like that Fireworshipper. Reader, you need to form your own opinion: I won’t offer one. Now, with your permission, let's move away from speculation and return to solid facts.

One of the most striking buildings I visited during my stay at Boston was the jail; the airiness and cleanliness were both perfect, and the arrangement was to me totally novel. Independent of the ground outside, which is walled all round, the jail itself is built under a large outer case, affording abundance of light and ventilation. This outer building forms a corridor all round the jail, affording protection to the keepers from all weathers, and thus enables them to keep an efficient watch over the inmates. Supposing any prisoner to escape from his cell, he is still hemmed in by this outer case, which has only one door, so situated that no one can approach it without being seen from a considerable distance; and, even if these difficulties be overcome, the outer wall common to all prisons still remains. As far as I could learn, no prisoner has ever been able to force his way out. At night a blaze of gas in the outer hall lights all the dormitories and the corridor which runs round outside the jail, thus rendering escape as difficult at night as in broad daylight. Water is freely supplied to every room on every storey, and means of bathing are arranged in various parts of the building. School-rooms, private rooms, and a chapel are all contained within this leviathan outer case. In short, to those who take an interest in improving the airiness of jails and the security of prisoners, this building is well worth the most careful examination; and I trust we may some day profit by the improvements which the ingenuity of the New Englanders has here exhibited, for the frequent escapes from our jails prove that some change is requisite.

One of the most impressive buildings I visited during my time in Boston was the jail; it was both airy and clean, and the design was completely new to me. Apart from the walled grounds outside, the jail itself is built within a large outer structure, allowing plenty of light and ventilation. This outer building creates a corridor around the jail, protecting the guards from all types of weather, which helps them keep a close watch on the inmates. If a prisoner were to escape from his cell, he would still be enclosed by this outer structure, which has only one entrance that is positioned so that no one can approach it without being seen from far away; and even if these challenges are overcome, the outer wall that all prisons share remains. From what I gathered, no prisoner has ever managed to break out. At night, a bright gas light in the outer hallway illuminates all the dormitories and the corridor that runs around the jail, making escape just as tough at night as during the day. Water is readily available in every room on every floor, and bathing facilities are set up in various areas of the building. Classrooms, private rooms, and a chapel are all included within this massive outer structure. In short, for those who care about making jails airier and securing prisoners, this building deserves a thorough examination; and I hope we can one day benefit from the improvements made by the ingenuity of the New Englanders here, as the frequent escapes from our jails indicate that some changes are necessary.

The Bostonians have applied the telegraph to a most important use, which, I believe, we have totally overlooked in England. The town is divided into sections, in each of which are a certain number of stations; all of these latter have a telegraph-office, communicating with one grand central office, by which means they explain where the fire is. The central office immediately indicates to every section the information thus obtained by the ringing of alarm-bells; and, by this method, every fire-station in the city is informed of the locality of the danger within a few minutes after its occurrence.

The people in Boston have put the telegraph to a really important use that I think we’ve completely missed in England. The city is divided into different sections, and each section has a certain number of stations. Every one of these stations has a telegraph office that connects to a central office. This way, they can communicate where a fire is located. The central office quickly alerts each section by ringing alarm bells, so all the fire stations in the city know where the danger is just a few minutes after it starts.

The naval arsenal at Boston is moderate in size, kept very clean; but when I visited it there were little signs of activity or life. They have only three building sheds, in one of which a vessel has been in progress for twenty years; the other two are vacant. The principal feature is the rope-walk, which is 1640 feet long, and worked by steam-power.

The naval yard in Boston is fairly small and well-maintained, but when I visited, it felt pretty lifeless. They only have three building sheds; one has been used for a ship that's been under construction for twenty years, while the other two are empty. The main highlight is the rope walk, which is 1,640 feet long and powered by steam.

The United States, being on friendly terms with England, and so far removed from Europe and its politics and its disturbances, pays comparatively little attention to the navy, which is small, when considered in reference to the size and wealth of the country and the extent of its seaboard.

The United States, maintaining a friendly relationship with England and located far from Europe and its political unrest, pays relatively little attention to its navy, which is small compared to the country's size, wealth, and the length of its coastline.

The convention for the amendment of the constitution being in session, I was enabled, through the kindness of Mr. Sumner, the senator for the State, to witness their proceedings, which were conducted with becoming dignity. The speakers, if not eloquent, at least adhered to the subject under discussion, in a manner some of the wordy and wandering gentlemen in our House of Commons might imitate with advantage.

The convention for revising the constitution was in session, and thanks to the generosity of Mr. Sumner, the senator from the state, I was able to observe their proceedings, which were carried out with proper dignity. The speakers, while not necessarily eloquent, stayed focused on the topic at hand, something some of the long-winded and meandering members of our House of Commons could benefit from imitating.

The supply of water for the town is brought from Lake Cochitnate, a distance of twenty miles; and the length of piping in connexion with it is upwards of 100 miles. The State authorized a city debt of 900,000l. for the necessary expenses of the undertaking and purchase of the ground, &c. The annual receipts amount to 36,000l., which will, of course, increase with the population. Dwelling-houses pay from 1l. as high as 15l. tax, according to their consumption. The average daily expenditure in 1853 was about 7,000,000 gallons, or nearly 50 gallons per head.

The town gets its water from Lake Cochitnate, which is twenty miles away, and the total length of the piping is over 100 miles. The state approved a city debt of £900,000 for the necessary costs of the project and land purchase, etc. The annual income is £36,000, which will naturally increase as the population grows. Residential properties pay a tax ranging from £1 to £15, depending on their usage. In 1853, the average daily water consumption was about 7,000,000 gallons, or nearly 50 gallons per person.

Before leaving Boston, I may as well give some evidence of the prosperity of the State. In the year 1830, the population was 600,000; at the present date it is 1,000,000. The exports of domestic produce, which in 1844 amounted to 1,275,000l., now amount to upwards of 2,830,000l.; and the imports, which at the former period amounted to 4,000,000l., now amount to nearly 7,000,000l. The population of Boston has increased 600 per cent. during the present century. Lowell, which is the great Manchester of Massachusetts, has increased its population from 6500 in 1830 to nearly 40,000 at the present date; and the capital invested, which in 1823 was only 500,000l., is now nearly 2,700,000l. I do not wish to weary my readers with statistics, and therefore trust I have said enough to convey a tolerable impression of the go-aheadism of these hardy and energetic descendants of the Pilgrim Fathers; and, for the same reasons, I have not made any observations upon their valuable libraries, hospitals, houses of industry, reformation, &c., the former of which are so largely indebted to private munificence. But before taking my leave of Boston, I must notice the great pleasure I derived from hearing in all quarters the favourable impression which Lord Elgin's visit, on the occasion of opening the railway in 1851, had produced. His eloquence and urbanity was a constant theme of conversation with many of my friends, who generally wound up by saying, "A few such visits as that of the Railway Jubilee would do more to cement the good feeling between the two countries than the diplomacy of centuries could effect." I must here add, that upon my visiting Quebec, I found that the same cordial feeling of fellowship had been produced on the Canadian mind, by the brotherly reception they had met with upon that memorable occasion. Farewell to Boston! but not farewell to the pleasing recollection of the many happy hours I spent, nor of the many kind friends whose acquaintance I enjoyed there, and which I hope on same future occasion to renew and improve.

Before leaving Boston, I should share some evidence of the state's prosperity. In 1830, the population was 600,000; now, it’s 1,000,000. The exports of domestic products, which were £1,275,000 in 1844, have now increased to over £2,830,000; and the imports, which in that earlier period were £4,000,000, are now nearly £7,000,000. Boston's population has grown by 600 percent this century. Lowell, often called the Manchester of Massachusetts, has seen its population rise from 6,500 in 1830 to nearly 40,000 today; the capital invested there, which was only £500,000 in 1823, is now nearly £2,700,000. I don’t want to overwhelm my readers with statistics, so I hope I’ve provided a clear impression of the driven and energetic descendants of the Pilgrim Fathers. For similar reasons, I haven't commented on their valuable libraries, hospitals, and welfare initiatives, many of which owe much to private generosity. But before I leave Boston, I must mention the great pleasure I felt hearing everywhere about the positive impression Lord Elgin’s visit had made during the railway opening in 1851. His eloquence and charm were constant topics of conversation among my friends, who often concluded by saying, "A few visits like the Railway Jubilee would do more to strengthen the bond between our two countries than centuries of diplomacy.” I should also add that when I visited Quebec, I found that the same warm sense of camaraderie had developed in Canada due to the friendly reception they received on that memorable occasion. Goodbye to Boston! but not goodbye to the fond memories of the many happy hours I spent there, nor to the kind friends I had the pleasure to meet, and I hope to reconnect and strengthen those ties in the future.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Such gifts during the lifetime of the donor, are in my estimation, better evidences of liberality and zeal in a cause, than the most munificent bequests even of a Stephen Gerard, who only gave what he could no longer enjoy.


A Vide observation by Mr. H. Mann, chap. 20.


The expense of printing proper books is sometimes mentioned as an objection, on account of requiring new types for the new sounds taught. No expense can outweigh the value of a change by which education can be facilitated; but even this difficulty has been obviated by Major Beniowski's plan. He obtains the new symbols requisite by simply inverting a certain number of letters for that purpose.



CHAPTER XVIII.

Canada.




Early morning found me seated in the cars on my way to Quebec. Not being a good hand at description of scenery, this railway travelling is a great boon to my unfortunate reader—if he have got thus far. A Nubian clothed in castor-oil, and descending from the heavens by a slippery seat upon a rainbow, might as well attempt to describe the beauties of our sphere as the caged traveller at the tail of the boiling kettle attempt to convey much idea of the scenery he passes through. Not merely do the scrunching squeaks of the break, the blasty trumpet whistle, the slamming of doors, and the squalling of children bewilder his brain and bedeafen his ears, but the iron tyrant enchains and confuses his eyes. A beautiful village rivets his attention,—bang he goes into the tunneled bowels of the earth; a magnificent panorama enchants his sight as he emerges from the realms of darkness; he calls to a neighbour to share the enjoyment of the lovely scene with him; the last sounds of the call have not died away, ere he finds himself wedged in between two embankments, with nought else but the sky for the eye to rest on. Is it any wonder, then—nay, rather, is it not an evidence of truthfulness—that I find the record of my journey thus described in my note-book:—"7-1/2 A.M., Fizz, fizz; hiss, hiss—waving fields—undulating ground—sky—varied tints of green—cottages, cattle, humanities—bridges, bays, rivers, dust, and heat—Rouse's Point, 7-1/2 P.M." At this point we got out of the cage and embarked in a steamer. The shroud of night hung heavily around us, and the lights of Montreal and its suburbs, reflected in the unruffled stream, shone all the brighter from the density of the surrounding darkness, and formed a brilliant illumination. In half an hour I was comfortably housed in the hotel, where, to my agreeable surprise, I met one of my countrywomen, whose many charms had made her a theme of much admiration at Washington, where I first had the pleasure of making her acquaintance.

Early morning found me sitting in a train on my way to Quebec. Since I'm not great at describing scenery, this train travel is a big help to my poor reader—if you've made it this far. A Nubian covered in castor oil, descending from the sky on a slippery rainbow, might as well try to describe the beauty of our world as a trapped traveler at the back of a steaming kettle trying to convey much about the scenery he’s passing. Not only do the screeching brakes, loud horn, slamming doors, and crying kids confuse his mind and deafen his ears, but the iron beast also restricts his view. A beautiful village captures his attention—then suddenly, he’s plunged into a dark tunnel; a stunning landscape dazzles his eyes as he comes out of the gloom; he calls to a neighbor to share the lovely view; but before the last echoes of his call fade away, he's squished between two embankments, staring at nothing but the sky. Is it any wonder, then—is it not a sign of truth—that my travel notes say: “7:30 A.M., fizz, fizz; hiss, hiss—waving fields—rolling land—sky—varied shades of green—cottages, cattle, people—bridges, bays, rivers, dust, and heat—Rouse's Point, 7:30 P.M.”? At this point, we got out of the train and boarded a steamer. The night wrapped around us, and the lights of Montreal and its suburbs, reflected in the calm water, shone even brighter because of the thick darkness, creating a dazzling display. Half an hour later, I was comfortably settled in the hotel, where, to my pleasant surprise, I ran into one of my countrywomen, whose many charms had made her a topic of admiration in Washington, where I first had the pleasure of meeting her.

Any one who, wandering far from home, finds himself surrounded with utter strangers, will partially understand the pleasure I enjoyed at finding one face I had looked upon before; but to understand it fully, they must know the face I was then gazing upon. Don't be curious, reader, as to whom it belonged, for I have no intention of enlightening you, further than to say it belonged to her and her husband. Twelve hours of railway makes me sleepy; it's my nature, and I can't help it, so I trust I may be excused, when I confess that I very soon exchanged the smile of beauty for the snore of Morpheus. What my dreams were, it concerns nobody to know.

Anyone who, while far from home, finds themselves surrounded by total strangers will somewhat understand the joy I felt at seeing a familiar face; but to fully grasp it, they need to know whose face I was looking at. Don't be curious, reader, about who it was, because I don't intend to reveal more than to say it belonged to her and her husband. Twelve hours on a train makes me sleepy; it's just my nature, and I can't help it, so I hope I'm forgiven when I admit that I quickly traded the smile of beauty for the snore of sleep. What my dreams were is nobody's business.

The magnificent brow of hill which overhangs Montreal was named in 1535 Mont Royal, by the famous Jacques Cartier, in honour of his royal master; the French settlement which arose a century after, in the neighbourhood of the Indian village of Hochelaga, assumed the name of the hill, and has at last shaken down into its present combination. What Goths, not to preserve the Indian name which savours of the land and of antiquity, instead of substituting a French concoction! With regard to the site of the town, there is no doubt it is on the island now called Montreal; but where that island is situated may be considered an open question; the river Ottawa runs into the St. Lawrence at the western extremity of the island, and the question is, whether the water on the northern shore is the Ottawa or the St. Lawrence; upon which depends whether the island is in the St. Lawrence, or between the St. Lawrence and the Ottawa. Not wishing to deprive either of their finger in the pie, I should give my verdict in favour of the latter opinion; but I leave it an open question to the reader. The population of the town is increasing rapidly, no doubt owing in great measure to emigration. In 1849 it was 48,000, in 1851, 58,000. The great majority are of the Church of Rome, 41,000; of the Church of England there are 4000; the other denominations are in small numbers.

The impressive hill that overlooks Montreal was named Mount Royal in 1535 by the famous Jacques Cartier, in honor of his royal master. A century later, the French settlement that developed near the Indian village of Hochelaga took the name of the hill, which eventually evolved into its current form. It's surprising that the settlers didn’t keep the Indian name, which reflects the land and its history, instead of replacing it with a French version! As for the town's location, there's no doubt it's on the island now called Montreal; however, the exact position of that island is still up for debate. The Ottawa River flows into the St. Lawrence at the island's western edge, leading to the question of whether the water along the northern shore is the Ottawa or the St. Lawrence, which determines if the island is in the St. Lawrence or situated between the St. Lawrence and the Ottawa. To be fair to both rivers, I'd lean toward the idea that it's between them, but I leave the conclusion open for the reader. The town’s population is rapidly growing, largely due to immigration. In 1849, it had 48,000 residents; by 1851, it reached 58,000. The vast majority are Roman Catholic, around 41,000; there are about 4,000 from the Church of England, and other denominations are in smaller numbers.

At the time I arrived, the town was full of gloom and excitement, for it was but a few days previous that the Roman Catholics endeavoured to murder Gavazzi, while delivering one of his anti-Romanistic lectures, which, whatever their merits or demerits, were most certainly very injudicious, considering the elements of which the population of Montreal is composed; and it cannot be denied, that Signor Gavazzi's lectures upon sacred subjects are delivered in a style partaking so much of the theatrical, that a person ignorant of the language of his address, might readily suppose that he was taking off John Kemble and Liston alternately, and therefore the uneducated Irish emigrants might very well conclude his sole object was to turn their creed into ridicule. I certainly never heard or saw a person, lecturing on sacred subjects, whose tone and manner were so ridiculously yet painfully at variance with the solemnity due to such a theme. The excitement produced, the constant calling out of the military, and the melancholy sequel, are too recent and well known to require recapitulation here. It is but just to the French Romanists to state, that as a body they repudiated and took no part in the villanous attempt upon Gavazzi's life; the assailants were almost exclusively Irish Romanists, who form nearly one-fifth of the population. Would that they could leaven their faith with those Christian virtues of peacefulness and moderation which shine so creditably in their co-religionists of French origin.

When I arrived, the town was filled with both gloom and excitement because just a few days earlier, the Roman Catholics had tried to kill Gavazzi while he was giving one of his anti-Roman lectures. Regardless of their value, his lectures were definitely ill-timed, given the mixed background of the people in Montreal. It's clear that Signor Gavazzi's talks on religious topics are presented in a style that feels quite theatrical; someone unfamiliar with the language might think he was imitating John Kemble and Liston at the same time. Because of this, the uneducated Irish immigrants could easily interpret his intention as making fun of their beliefs. I had never seen anyone lecture on sacred subjects whose tone and demeanor were so ridiculously out of place with the seriousness the topic deserved. The excitement that followed, the frequent deployment of the military, and the sad aftermath are all too recent and well-known to need repeating here. It’s fair to mention that the French Roman Catholics, as a group, completely rejected and were not involved in the vile attempt on Gavazzi's life; the attackers were largely Irish Roman Catholics, who make up about one-fifth of the population. If only they could blend their faith with the Christian virtues of peace and moderation that are so commendably displayed by their French co-religionists.

While touching upon the subject of the military being called out in aid of the civil power, I am reminded of a passage extracted from some journal which a friend showed me, and which I consider so well expressed, that I make no apology for giving it at length.

While discussing the military being called in to support civilian authorities, I remember a passage from a journal that a friend shared with me, and I find it so well expressed that I have no hesitation in sharing it in full.

"THE MOB.—The mob is a fierce and uncontrollable demon. It will not

listen to reason: it won't be swayed by fear, pity, or

self-preservation. It has no sense of fairness. Its energy is focused

in chaotic bursts; its patience is indifference or unawareness. It is a

It's a serious mistake to think that this cruel, worthless monster has

any political emotion. In its success, it shatters windows; in its

Anger can cause harm. Give in to it, and it leads to chaos;

disappoint it, and it gets angry; try to calm it down, and it

becomes outrageous; face it head-on, and it backs down. It is

accessible only to the feeling of personal suffering; it gives in to

There's no debate except for the one enforced by might. The threat of the bayonet.

convincing; the sharpness of the saber communicates sharply; the sound of gunfire

is heard with respect; the sound of artillery is undeniable.

How deep, how serious, how heavy is the responsibility that lies

on anyone who would stir up this fury from its lair! It is remarkable, it

is too little known how much individual character is lost in the

the combined nature of many individuals. People can be logical and balanced,

peaceful, loyal, and sober, as individuals; yet group them by the

thousand, and as the gathering continues, loyalty,

calmness, balance, and logic disappear, and a crowd of

A rational being is an unreasonable and impulsive being—a wild,

an enraged monster, which can be controlled but not guided, except to

mischief—which has a thirst for blood and a brutal delight in

"destruction, just for the sake of enjoyment in destroying."

The various fires with which the city has been visited, however distressing to the sufferers, have not been without their good effect, of which the eye has most satisfactory evidence in the numerous public and other buildings now built of stone. The only monument in the city is one which was raised to Nelson. Whether the memory of the hero has passed away, or the ravages of the weather call too heavily on the public purse, I cannot say; but it would be more creditable to the town to remove it entirely, than to allow it to remain in its present disgraceful state. It is reported that its restoration is to be effected by private subscription; if so, more shame to the authorities.

The various fires that have hit the city, while distressing for those affected, have had some positive outcomes, clearly seen in the many public and other buildings now constructed from stone. The only monument in the city is one dedicated to Nelson. Whether the memory of the hero has faded or the damage from the weather is too much for the public budget, I can’t say; but it would reflect better on the town to remove it entirely than to let it stay in its current disgraceful condition. It’s been reported that its restoration will be funded through private donations; if that’s the case, it’s even more shameful for the authorities.

As nay first object was to reach Quebec, I only stayed one day at Montreal, which I employed in driving about to see what changes had taken place in the town and neighbourhood since my former visit in 1826. I started by steamer in the evening, and arrived early the next morning.

As my main goal was to reach Quebec, I only spent one day in Montreal, which I used to explore the changes that had happened in the town and the surrounding area since my last visit in 1826. I took a steamer in the evening and arrived early the next morning.

Is there any scene more glorious to look upon than that which greets the eye from the citadel at Quebec? The only scene I know more glorious is Rio Janeiro, which I believe to be by far the grandest in the world; but the Rio lacks the associations of Quebec. Who can ever forget that beneath its walls two chieftains, the bravest of the brave, fell on the same battle-field—the one in the arms of victory, the other in defence of his country and her honour? The spot where our hero fell is marked by a pillar thus simply inscribed:—

Is there any scene more beautiful to behold than the view from the fortress in Quebec? The only place I know that is more stunning is Rio de Janeiro, which I consider to be the most spectacular in the world; however, Rio doesn't have the history that Quebec does. Who can forget that beneath its walls, two leaders, the fiercest of warriors, died on the same battlefield—one in triumph and the other defending his country and her honor? The place where our hero fell is marked by a pillar with this simple inscription:—

HERE LIES

WOLFE,

Victorious.

Nor has the noble foe been forgotten, though for a long time unnoticed. In the year 1827, the Earl of Dalhousie being Governor-General, a monument was raised in Quebec to Wolfe and Montcalm; and the death they both met at the post of honour is commemorated on the same column,—a column on which an Englishman may gaze with pride and a Frenchman without a blush. The following words, forming part of the inscription, I think well worthy of insertion: "Military prowess gave them a common death, History a common fame, Posterity a common monument."

Nor has the noble enemy been forgotten, even though they went long unnoticed. In 1827, when the Earl of Dalhousie was Governor-General, a monument was erected in Quebec to honor Wolfe and Montcalm; and the way they both died at the front lines is remembered on the same column—a column on which an Englishman can look with pride and a Frenchman without shame. The following words, which are part of the inscription, are worth including: "Military prowess gave them a common death, History a common fame, Posterity a common monument."

It is a curious fact, that when the foundation-stone was laid, an old soldier from Ross-shire, the last living veteran of the gallant band who fought under Wolfe, was present at the ceremony, being then in his ninety-fifth year. Everybody who has seen or read of Quebec must remember the magnificent towering rock overhanging the river, on the summit of which the citadel is placed, forming at once the chief stronghold of its defence, and the grandest feature of its scenery. But perhaps everybody does not know that to this same glorious feature the city owes its name. The puny exclamation of Jacques Cartier's Norman pilot upon beholding it was, "Que bec!" and this expression of admiration has buried, in all but total oblivion, the old Algonquin name of Stadacona. What a pity that old pilot was not born dumb.

It’s interesting to note that when the foundation stone was laid, an old soldier from Ross-shire, the last living veteran of the brave group that fought under Wolfe, attended the ceremony, at that time in his ninety-fifth year. Anyone who has seen or read about Quebec must remember the magnificent towering rock that overlooks the river, on top of which the citadel stands, serving as both the main stronghold of its defense and the most impressive feature of its landscape. However, not everyone may know that this same glorious feature is what the city is named after. The simple exclamation from Jacques Cartier's Norman pilot when he saw it was, "Que bec!" and this expression of admiration has mostly overshadowed the old Algonquin name of Stadacona. What a shame that old pilot wasn’t mute.

The increase of population here does not seem, to be very rapid. In 1844, it was about 36,000; now, it is little more than 42,000. There can be no doubt that the severity of the climate is one great cause of so small an increase. When it is remembered that the average arrival of the first vessel after the breaking up of the ice is between the last week of April and the first week in May, this need not he much wondered at.

The population growth here doesn't seem to be very fast. In 1844, it was about 36,000; now, it's just over 42,000. There's no doubt that the harsh climate is a major reason for such slow growth. Considering that the first ship typically arrives after the ice melts between the last week of April and the first week of May, this isn't too surprising.

The Governor-General's residence, is removed from the town, and a beautiful little country villa, called Spencer Wood, has been assigned him in lieu. It is situated on the banks of the river, about half a mile inland; the only objection to it is, that the size thereof is not sufficient for vice-regal entertainments; but a very slight addition would remedy that defect. In all other respects it is a charming place, as I can gratefully testify. The drives and sights around the city are too well known to need much notice from me.

The Governor-General's residence is located away from the town, and he has been given a lovely little country villa called Spencer Wood instead. It sits on the riverbank, about half a mile from the coast; the only downside is that it's not big enough for vice-regal gatherings, but a small extension would fix that issue. Other than that, it's a wonderful place, and I can say that with appreciation. The drives and sights around the city are so familiar that I don't need to say much about them.

Montmorenci, with its frozen cone in winter, is one of the chief resorts for pic-nickers in their sleighs. The trackless path over the frozen snow during the season is as full of life as Windsor park was in the old Ascot days. Bright eyes beaming from rosy cheeks, and half buried in furs, anxiously watch for the excitement of a capsize, and laugh merrily as the mixed tenants of some sleigh are seen rolling over one another in most ludicrous confusion; the sun shines brightly, the bells ring cheerily, all is jollity and fun, and a misanthrope would be as much out of his element in one of these pic-nics as a bear in a ballet.

Montmorenci, with its icy peak in winter, is one of the main spots for picnickers in their sleighs. The unmarked trails over the frozen snow during the season are as lively as Windsor Park was back in the old Ascot days. Bright eyes shining from rosy cheeks, half-hidden in furs, eagerly watch for the thrill of a sleigh overturning, laughing joyfully as the mixed guests of some sleigh tumble over each other in hilarious disarray; the sun shines brightly, the bells ring cheerfully, everything is fun and laughter, and a misanthrope would feel as out of place at one of these picnics as a bear in a ballet.

The falls of Lorette afford another pleasant excursion, not forgetting old Paul and his wife—a venerable Indian chief and his squaw—whom I visited, and the cleanliness of whose cottage I had great pleasure in complimenting him upon, as also upon his various medals, which extended from Château Gai down to the Exhibition of 1851. He appeared as much struck with my venerable appearance as I was with his; for, upon being asked my age, he bestowed a searching glance from head to foot, and then gravely replied, "Seventy-five." I rebelled against his decision, and appealed to his wife, who kindly took my part, and after a steady gaze, said, "Oh, Paul! that gentleman is not more than seventy-two." It was in vain I tried to satisfy them, that thirty summers would have to pass over my head before I reached that honourable time of life. However, it is not only Indians who miscalculate age, for a young lady, fresh from Ireland, having the same question put to her, said "Sixty;" and upon being told she was seventeen years out in her calculation, she replied, with painful coolness, "Which way?" I never felt a confirmed old bachelor till I heard that awful "Which way?"

The Falls of Lorette offer another nice outing, not to mention old Paul and his wife—a respected Indian chief and his partner—whom I visited. I really enjoyed complimenting him on how clean his cottage was, as well as his various medals, which ranged from Château Gai to the 1851 Exhibition. He seemed just as surprised by my age as I was by his; when I was asked how old I was, he gave me a thorough look from head to toe and then seriously replied, "Seventy-five." I protested against his judgment and asked his wife for support, who kindly agreed with me. After looking at me carefully, she said, "Oh, Paul! That gentleman is no more than seventy-two." I tried in vain to explain that it would take thirty more summers for me to reach that distinguished age. But it's not just Indians who misjudge age; a young lady, newly arrived from Ireland, was asked the same question and stated "Sixty." When she was told she was off by seventeen years, she responded, with a strikingly calm expression, "Which way?" I never truly felt like a confirmed old bachelor until I heard that dreadful "Which way?"

The roads round about in all directions are admirable; not so if you cross the river to the Falls of the Chaudière; but the abomination of abominations is the ferry-boat, and the facilities, or rather obstacles, for entering and exiting. To any one who has seen the New York ferry-boats, and all the conveniences connected with them, the contrast is painfully humiliating. In the one case you drive on board as readily as into a court-yard, and find plenty of room when you get there; in the other, you have half a dozen men holding horses and carriages, screaming in all directions, and more time is wasted in embarking than a Yankee boat would employ to deposit you safely on the other side; and it would puzzle a Philadelphia lawyer to decide which is the more abominable, the exit or the entry. Nevertheless, the traveller will find himself compensated for all his troubles—especially if the horse and carriage be a friend's—by the lovely drive which takes him to the Chaudière Falls, a trip I had the pleasure of making in company with a jolly party of good fellows belonging to the 72nd Highlanders, then in garrison at Quebec, and whose hospitalities during my stay I gratefully remember.

The roads around are great in every direction; that's not the case if you cross the river to the Falls of the Chaudière; but the worst part is the ferry boat and the hassle of getting on and off. Anyone who has seen the New York ferry boats and all the conveniences that come with them will find the contrast frustratingly humiliating. On one hand, you drive right on board like pulling into a parking lot, and there’s plenty of space when you arrive; on the other hand, you have a bunch of guys managing horses and carriages, shouting in every direction, and you end up spending more time getting on than a New York boat would take to get you safely across; it would even stump a Philadelphia lawyer to figure out whether the exit or the entry is worse. Still, the traveler will find that all his troubles are worth it—especially if the horse and carriage belong to a friend—thanks to the beautiful drive that leads to the Chaudière Falls, which I had the pleasure of experiencing with a fun group of good guys from the 72nd Highlanders, who were stationed in Quebec at the time, and whose hospitality during my visit I gratefully remember.

If, however, an Englishman feels humiliated in crossing the Quebec ferry, he feels a compensating satisfaction upon entering the Quebec Legislative Council Chamber, which in its aspect of cleanliness, furniture, &c., has an appearance of refinement far superior to that at Washington. As they were not sitting during my stay in Canada, I had no opportunity of drawing any comparison on their different modes of carrying on public business. I had heard so much during my absence from England of the famous Rebellion Losses Bill, and all the obloquy which had been heaped upon the Governor-General in consequence, that I was very anxious to get some insight into the true state of the case, although perhaps the justification of the Earl of Elgin's conduct by Sir Robert Peel ought to have satisfied me.

If an Englishman feels embarrassed while crossing the Quebec ferry, he finds some comfort when he enters the Quebec Legislative Council Chamber, which looks much cleaner and more refined than what’s found in Washington. Since they weren’t in session during my time in Canada, I didn’t get a chance to compare how they handle public business. I had heard so much about the notorious Rebellion Losses Bill during my time away from England, and all the criticism that was directed at the Governor-General because of it, that I was eager to understand the actual situation, even though Sir Robert Peel’s defense of the Earl of Elgin's actions should have been enough to satisfy me.

I soon became convinced that in this, as in most similar cases, the violence of party spirit had clouded truth; and the bitterness of defeat, in minds thus prejudiced, had sought relief in the too-common channels of violence and abuse. However much to be deplored, I fear that the foregoing opinions will be found, on most occasions of political excitement, to be true. The old party, who may be said to have enjoyed the undisguised support of the Queen's representatives from time immemorial, were not likely to feel very well disposed to Lord Elgin, when they found that he was determined to identify himself with no particular party, but that, being sent to govern Canada constitutionally, he was resolved to follow the example of his sovereign, and give his confidence and assistance to whichever party proved, by its majority, to be the legitimate representative of the opinions of the governed, at the same time ever upholding the right and dignity of the Crown. This was, of course, a first step in unpopularity with the party who, long triumphant, now found themselves in a minority; then, again, it must be remembered that a majority which had for so many years been out of power was not likely, in the excitement of victory, to exercise such moderation as would be calculated to soothe the irritated feelings of their opponents, who, they considered, had enjoyed too long the colonial loaves and fishes.

I quickly became convinced that in this, as in many similar situations, the intensity of party loyalty had obscured the truth; and the bitterness of defeat in minds that were biased sought relief in the all-too-familiar outlets of violence and insults. As unfortunate as it is, I fear that these opinions will often be true during times of political upheaval. The old party, which had openly enjoyed the support of the Queen's representatives for ages, was unlikely to feel very positively about Lord Elgin when they saw that he was determined not to align himself with any specific party. Instead, being sent to govern Canada constitutionally, he was committed to following his sovereign's example and giving his confidence and support to whichever party, by its majority, truly represented the views of the people, while always upholding the rights and dignity of the Crown. This was, of course, a first step toward unpopularity with the party that had long been in power but now found themselves in the minority. Additionally, it should be noted that a majority that had been out of power for so many years was unlikely, in the excitement of victory, to show the kind of restraint that could calm the resentful feelings of their opponents, whom they believed had enjoyed the benefits of colonial rule for too long.

With all these elements at work, it is not to be wondered at that a question which admitted of misinterpretation should be greedily laid hold of, and that, thus misinterpreted, the passions of the mob should be successfully roused. I believe there is little question that the Government brought forward the Rebellion Losses Bill in the Senate in a manner, if not arrogant, at all events most offensive, and thus added fuel to the flames; but, viewed dispassionately, what is the truth of this far-famed bill? It was framed upon the precedent of that for the payment of similar losses in Upper Canada on a previous occasion, and I believe the very same commissioners were appointed to carry out its provisions. It received the sanction of the Governor-General in the same way as all other bills, and was never smuggled through, as the irritated opposition and infuriated mobs would have us believe. The Governor-General clearly states that it never was intended in any way "to compensate the losses of persons guilty of the heinous crime of treason," and the names of the commissioners appointed to decide upon the claims of the sufferers might alone have been a sufficient guarantee that such an abominable idea was never entertained. Without mentioning others, take Colonel W.C. Hanson: schooled in the field of honour and patriotism, whose courage has been tried in many a bloody struggle during the Peninsular war, and is attested by the honourable badges that adorn his breast. Is a recreant rebel likely to find sympathy in that breast which for half a century stood unchallenged for loyalty and truth? What do his letters, as one of the commissioners, prove beyond the shadow of a doubt? I have them now before me; and, so far from claims being hastily admitted, I find the gallant old soldier constantly advocating the cause of some claimant whom the commissioners declined to indemnify, but never yet have I seen his name as opposed to any compensation granted; possessing that still more noble quality which is ever the lovely handmaid of true courage, his voice is raised again and again for mercy.

With all these factors in play, it’s no surprise that a question open to misinterpretation was quickly seized upon, and that, once misinterpreted, the emotions of the crowd were effectively stirred up. It’s widely accepted that the Government introduced the Rebellion Losses Bill in the Senate in a way that, if not arrogant, was definitely offensive, thus fueling the conflict even more. But if we take a step back, what’s the reality of this well-known bill? It was based on the precedent of similar payments made for losses in Upper Canada on a previous occasion, and I believe the same commissioners were appointed to handle its implementation. It received the approval of the Governor-General just like any other bill and was never pushed through secretly, despite what the angry opposition and outraged crowds would have us think. The Governor-General clearly stated that it was never meant "to compensate the losses of individuals guilty of the serious crime of treason," and the names of the commissioners assigned to evaluate the claims of the victims alone would have been enough to assure that such a terrible idea was never considered. Without going into others, just look at Colonel W.C. Hanson: trained in the values of honor and patriotism, whose bravery has been tested in many fierce battles during the Peninsular War, as highlighted by the distinguished medals on his chest. Would a traitorous rebel find any support from someone whose loyalty and integrity have remained unquestioned for half a century? What do his letters, as one of the commissioners, clearly demonstrate? I have them in front of me now; far from claims being rushed through, I see the brave old soldier often advocating for the cases of claimants that the commissioners denied compensation to, but I have never seen his name listed against any compensation granted; embodying that even more admirable quality which is always the graceful companion of true courage, his voice repeatedly calls out for mercy.

I could quote from numerous letters of this veteran, extracts similar to the following:—The claimants were inhabitants of St. Benoit, some portion of which population had been in arms as rebels, but upon the approach of the Queen's troops they had all laid down their arms. As to the facts of the case, Colonel Hanson writes to Lord Seaton, who replies:—"The soldiers were regularly put up in the village by the Quartermaster-General's department, and strict orders were issued to each officer to protect the inhabitants and their property; Lieut.-Col. Townsend to remain in the village of St. Benoit for its protection, the remainder of the troops to return to Montreal. The utmost compassion and consideration should be felt for the families of the sufferers plunged into affliction by the reckless conduct of their relatives; every house injured or destroyed at St. Benoit was a wanton destruction, perpetrated in defiance of guards placed to protect property." Thus writes Lord Seaton. Colonel Hanson, after quoting the above, proceeds to state that the evidence before the commissioners proves that "immediately after Lieut.-Col. Townsend assembled his regiment for the purpose of marching back to Montreal, the volunteers from the northern townships commenced plundering the village, carrying off the whole of the effects belonging to the inhabitants, burning the church, and nearly every house in the village ... wilfully and wantonly destroying houses, and in many instances burning valuable barns and granaries.... Therefore I humbly pretend that every such individual who thus suffered should be indemnified, as his loss was a wanton destruction of the dwellings, buildings, property, and effects of the said inhabitants." Yet such was the jealous way in which the commissioners excluded all doubtful claimants, that Colonel Hanson found himself in a minority upon the consideration of the foregoing claims, and, as a man of honour and anxious for justice, felt it his duty to address a letter to the Governor-General upon the subject, from which letter, bearing date January, 1852, the foregoing extracts have been taken.

I could quote from many letters written by this veteran, similar to the following:—The claimants were residents of St. Benoit, some of whom had taken up arms as rebels, but when the Queen's troops approached, they all laid down their weapons. Regarding the facts of the case, Colonel Hanson writes to Lord Seaton, who replies:—"The soldiers were properly stationed in the village by the Quartermaster-General's department, and strict orders were given to each officer to protect the residents and their property; Lieut.-Col. Townsend was to stay in the village of St. Benoit for its protection, while the rest of the troops were to return to Montreal. The utmost compassion and consideration should be shown for the families of those suffering due to the reckless actions of their relatives; every house damaged or destroyed in St. Benoit was an unnecessary act of destruction, done in defiance of the guards assigned to protect property." Thus writes Lord Seaton. After quoting the above, Colonel Hanson states that the evidence before the commissioners shows that "immediately after Lieut.-Col. Townsend assembled his regiment to march back to Montreal, volunteers from the northern townships began looting the village, taking all of the belongings of the residents, burning down the church, and nearly every house in the village ... willfully and needlessly destroying homes, and in many cases burning valuable barns and granaries.... Therefore I humbly suggest that every individual who suffered in this way should be compensated, as their losses resulted from the wanton destruction of the homes, buildings, property, and belongings of those residents." Yet the commissioners were so strict in excluding all questionable claimants that Colonel Hanson found himself in the minority regarding these claims, and, as a man of honor who cared about justice, he felt it was his duty to write a letter to the Governor-General about this issue, from which letter, dated January 1852, the above extracts have been taken.

I have very many of such complaints of justice being withheld from claimants, in the opinion of the gallant colonel, now lying before me, but "ex uno disce omnes." I have read a great portion of the Report, and the conclusion is irresistibly forced upon my mind, that everything which could possibly be brought to assume the slightest shade of rebellion was made fatal to an applicant's claim; but if anything were wanting to satisfy my mind that the vilifiers of the "Losses Bill" had not any ground of complaint against the measure, it would be found in the fact, that among its various opponents to whom I spoke, they one and all exclaimed, "Look at the case of Nelson, absolutely a rebel in arms, and his claims listened to!" This was their invariable reply; and, until I made inquiry, it looked very bad. But what was the real state of the case? Simply that Nelson, having been ruined by his rebellion, many loyal and faithful subjects to whom he owed debts suffered for his faults; and the money awarded for the losses sustained by the rebel went to pay the loyal debtors, except a small portion which was granted to his wife, who was well known to be strongly opposed to the course he had pursued, and who had lost considerable property which she held in her own right. I say that the fact of Nelson's case being always brought up as the great enormity carried more conviction to my mind of the utter weakness of the opponents' cause than anything else; and it also proved to me how ignorant many of them were of the truth, for several of them who vilified the Bill, the Government, and the Governor-General, had not the slightest idea, till I informed them, how the Nelson award was applied.

I’ve received a lot of complaints about justice being denied to claimants, according to the brave colonel who is currently lying before me, but "ex uno disce omnes." I’ve read a significant part of the Report, and it’s clear to me that anything that even slightly hinted at rebellion was enough to ruin an applicant’s claim. However, if I needed further proof that the critics of the "Losses Bill" had no legitimate complaint against it, it would be found in the fact that all the opponents I spoke with replied, “Look at Nelson's case—he was outright a rebel in arms, and his claims were heard!” This was their constant response, and until I dug deeper, it seemed quite serious. But what was the actual situation? Simply that Nelson, having been ruined by his rebellion, caused many loyal and faithful subjects to suffer because of his debts; the money awarded for the losses he caused went to pay off those loyal creditors, except for a small amount given to his wife, who was known to be strongly against his actions and had lost considerable property of her own. I believe that the fact that Nelson's case is always cited as the major scandal makes me more convinced of the complete weakness of the opponents’ arguments than anything else; it also showed me how unaware many of them were of the actual facts, since several who attacked the Bill, the Government, and the Governor-General had no idea, until I explained, how the Nelson award was used.

There is no doubt that the atrocities of which Montreal was the scene constitute the most discreditable features in modern Canadian history, and which, it is to be hoped, the instigators to and actors in are long since fully ashamed of; nor can the temper and judgment of the Governor-General on this trying occasion be too highly extolled. When it was imperative to dissolve the Parliament, he foresaw that his not doing so in person would be misconstrued by his enemies, and that he would be branded by them with that most galling of all accusations to a noble heart—cowardice. With a high-minded sense of duty, he put all such personal considerations aside. There were two courses open to him: one, to call out the military, and in their safe keeping dissolve the Assembly; the other, to depute the Commander of the Forces to perform that duty. The former must have produced a collision with the populace, and the blood of many whom he believed to be as loyal as he knew they were misguided and excited would have flowed freely; the latter, he foresaw, would be misconstrued into an act of personal cowardice, but he knew it would prevent a flow of blood, the remembrance of which would keep alive the bitterest elements of political animosity for years to come. With true patriotism, he sacrificed himself at the shrine of the country he was sent to govern, preferring to be the subject of the most galling accusations rather than shed unnecessarily one drop of the blood of those committed to his rule.

There’s no doubt that the events in Montreal are some of the most shameful moments in modern Canadian history, and hopefully, those who were involved are now fully ashamed of their actions. The Governor-General's demeanor and judgment during this difficult time deserve high praise. When it became necessary to disband Parliament, he realized that if he didn’t do it himself, his enemies would twist it to portray him as a coward—one of the most humiliating accusations for someone with noble intentions. With a strong sense of duty, he set aside all personal concerns. He had two options: one was to call in the military and have them safely disband the Assembly; the other was to delegate that responsibility to the Commander of the Forces. The first option would likely have led to a confrontation with the public, resulting in the bloodshed of many people he believed were loyal but misguided. The second option, while it could be interpreted as personal cowardice, would prevent bloodshed and keep the most bitter elements of political strife from festering for years. With true patriotism, he prioritized the welfare of the country he governed, choosing to face the harshest accusations rather than spill even a single drop of blood unnecessarily.

During the whole of Lord Elgin's able and prosperous administration, I can scarcely conceive any one act of his to which he can look back with more satisfaction, than this triumph of his judgment over his feelings, when he offered up just pride and dignity on the altar of mercy, and retired to Quebec. A shallow-pated fellow, who had probably figured personally in the outrages of that period, in talking to me on the subject, thus described it,—"he bolted off in a funk to Quebec;" and doubtless hundreds of others, as shallow-pated as himself, had been made to believe such was the case, and vituperation being the easiest of all ignoble occupations, they had probably done their best to circulate the paltry slander. Lord Elgin, however, needs no goose-quill defender; the unprecedented increasing prosperity of the colony under his administration is the most valuable testimony he could desire. It is not every governor who, on his arrival, finding a colony in confusion and rebellion, has the satisfaction, on his resignation of office, of leaving harmony and loyalty in their place, and the revenue during the same period increased from 400,000l. to 1,500,000l.: and if any doubt ever rested upon his mind as to whether his services were approved of and appreciated at home, it must have been removed in the most gratifying manner, when, upon a public dinner being given him at the London Tavern, 1854, all shades of politicals gathered readily to do him honour; and while the chairman, Lord John Russell, was eulogizing his talents and his administration, five other colonial and ex-colonial ministers were present at the same board to endorse the compliment; the American Minister also bearing his testimony to the happy growth of good feeling between the two countries, which Lord Elgin had so successfully fostered and developed. I cannot recal to my memory any other instance of so great an honour having been paid to a colonial governor.

During Lord Elgin's successful administration, I can hardly think of any action he can look back on with more satisfaction than the way he prioritized mercy over his own pride and dignity when he decided to step down and returned to Quebec. A clueless guy, who likely took part in the unrest of that time, described it to me by saying, “he bolted off in a funk to Quebec,” and surely many others, just as ignorant, believed that was true. Since venting anger is the easiest way to be negative, they likely spread that petty slander. However, Lord Elgin doesn't need a pen-wielding defender; the unprecedented growth and prosperity of the colony during his time in charge speaks volumes. Not every governor, upon arriving to find a chaotic and rebellious colony, can take satisfaction in leaving behind a state of harmony and loyalty, with revenues soaring from 400,000l. to 1,500,000l. If he ever had doubts about whether his efforts were recognized and appreciated back home, they were surely put to rest in the most gratifying way when, at a public dinner held for him at the London Tavern in 1854, people from all political backgrounds gathered to honor him; while the chairman, Lord John Russell, praised his skills and leadership, five other colonial and former colonial ministers were at the same table to support the praise. The American Minister also acknowledged the positive relationship between the two countries that Lord Elgin had so effectively nurtured. I can't recall any other instance of such a significant honor being given to a colonial governor.

I was astonished to find so little had been done in Canada for the organization of a militia force, especially when their republican neighbours afford them an example of so much activity and efficiency in that department. It may not be desirable as yet for the colony to establish any military school, such as West Point; but it might be agreeable and advantageous to the colonists, if we allowed a given number of young men to be educated at each of our military colleges in England; those only being eligible, who, by a severe examination, had proved their capabilities, and whose conduct at the places of their education had been noted as exemplary. By such simple means, a certain amount of military knowledge would gradually be diffused amongst the colonists, which would render them more efficient to repress internal troubles or repel foreign aggression.

I was surprised to see how little had been done in Canada to organize a militia force, especially when their republican neighbors set such an active and effective example. While it may not be necessary for the colony to establish a military school like West Point just yet, it could be beneficial and helpful to the colonists if we allowed a certain number of young men to be educated at our military colleges in England. Only those who pass a rigorous examination to prove their abilities, and whose behavior at their schools has been commendable, would be eligible. By using this simple approach, a good amount of military knowledge could gradually spread among the colonists, making them better equipped to handle internal issues or defend against foreign threats.

As it may be interesting to some of my readers, I shall here give a slight sketch of the Canadian parliaments. The Legislative Assembly, or House of Commons, is composed of eighty-four members, being forty-two for each province. The qualification for membership is 500l., and the franchise 40s. freehold, or 7l. 10s. the householder; it is also granted to wealthy leaseholders and to farmers renting largely; the term is for four years, and members are paid 1l. per day while sitting, and 6d. per mile travelling expenses. The Legislative Council consists of forty members, and is named by the Crown for life. The Cabinet, or Executive Council, are ten in number, and selected from both Houses by the Governor-General. Their Chancellor of the Exchequer is the Prime Minister. The Canadians wish to do away with the qualification for members of the Assembly, retaining the qualification for the franchise, and to increase the number of members to sixty-five for each province. They also desire to supersede the nomination of the Crown, and to make the Legislative Council elective,[AO] with a property qualification of 1000l., thirty members for each province; these latter to be elected for six years.

As it might be of interest to some of my readers, I will now provide a brief overview of the Canadian parliaments. The Legislative Assembly, or House of Commons, has eighty-four members, with forty-two from each province. To qualify for membership, an individual needs to have £500, and the voting requirement is £40 in freehold or £7.10 as a householder. Wealthy leaseholders and large-scale farmers are also eligible to vote. The term length is four years, and members receive £1 per day while in session, plus 6d. per mile in travel expenses. The Legislative Council consists of forty members who are appointed by the Crown for life. The Cabinet, or Executive Council, is made up of ten members chosen from both Houses by the Governor-General. The Prime Minister serves as the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Canadians want to eliminate the membership qualification for the Assembly, keep the voting qualification, and increase the number of members to sixty-five for each province. They also aim to replace the Crown's appointment with an elected Legislative Council, which would have a property requirement of £1,000, with thirty members from each province elected for six years.

With regard to the proposed change in the Legislative Council, I confess I look upon its supposed advantages—if carried out—with considerable doubt, inasmuch as the electors being the same as those for the other Chamber, it will become merely a lower house, elected for a longer period, and will lose that prestige which might have been obtained by exacting a higher qualification from the electors. Then, again, I think the period for which they are elected decidedly too short, being fully convinced that an increase in duration will usually produce an increase in the respectability of the candidates offering themselves for election; an opinion in which I am fully borne out by many of the wisest heads who assisted in framing the government of the United States, and who deplored excessively the shortness of the period for which the senators were elected.[AP] I cannot believe, either, that the removing the power of nomination entirely from the Crown will prove beneficial to the colony. Had the experiment been commenced with the Crown resigning the nomination of one-half of the members, I think it would have been more prudent, and would have helped to keep alive those feelings of association with, and loyalty to, the Crown which I am fully certain the majority of the Canadians deeply feel; a phalanx of senators, removed from all the sinister influences of the periodical simoons common to all countries would thus have been retained, and the Governor-General would have had the power of calling the highest talent and patriotism to his councils, in those times of political excitement when the passions of electors are too likely to be enlisted in favour of voluble agitators, who have neither cash nor character to lose. However, as these questions are to be decided, as far as this country is concerned, by those who probably care but little for my opinions, and as the question is not one likely to interest the general reader, I shall not dilate further upon it.

Regarding the proposed change in the Legislative Council, I have significant doubts about its supposed benefits if implemented. Since the voters will be the same as those for the other Chamber, it would simply become a lower house, elected for a longer term, and would lose the prestige that might have come from requiring a higher standard from the voters. Additionally, I believe the term for which members are elected is definitely too short. I’m convinced that a longer duration would usually lead to a more respectable group of candidates stepping forward, a view supported by many of the most knowledgeable figures involved in shaping the U.S. government, who expressed concern over the short term for senators.[AP] I also don’t think that completely taking away the nomination power from the Crown will benefit the colony. If the experiment had started with the Crown giving up the nomination of half the members, it would have been wiser and would have helped maintain the sense of connection and loyalty to the Crown that I’m sure most Canadians feel. This approach would have retained a group of senators free from the negative influences common in all countries, and the Governor-General would have had the ability to bring the best talent and patriotism into his councils during times of political turmoil, when the passions of voters are too likely to be swayed by charismatic agitators who have nothing to lose. However, as these issues will be resolved, regarding this country, by those who likely care little for my opinions, and since this topic is unlikely to engage the average reader, I won't go into it further.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Since my return to England the proposed increase in the Legislative Assembly has taken place. The Imperial Government has also empowered the colony to alter the constitution of the Legislative Council, and to render it elective if they thought proper so to do.


Vide Chapter on the "Constitution of the United States."



CHAPTER XIX.

A Trip to the Uttawa.




Having spent a fortnight in the enjoyment of lovely scenery and warm hospitality, and taken a last and lingering gaze at the glorious panoramic view from the citadel, I embarked once more on the St. Lawrence. It was evening; and, as the moon rose bright and clear, the wooded banks and silvered stream formed as charming a picture as the eye of man could wish to rest upon. Morning found us at Montreal. Among my fellow-passengers were two members of the Cabinet, or Executive Council, Mr. Hincks and Mr. Drummond, both on their way to the Ottawa, the commercial importance of that river to the prosperity of the colony having induced them to take the trip with a view of ascertaining, by actual observation and examination, what steps were most advisable to improve its navigation.

After spending two weeks enjoying beautiful scenery and warm hospitality, and taking a final long look at the amazing panoramic view from the citadel, I set off again on the St. Lawrence. It was evening; and, as the moon rose bright and clear, the wooded banks and sparkling stream created a picture as lovely as one could wish to see. By morning, we arrived in Montreal. Among my fellow passengers were two members of the Cabinet, or Executive Council, Mr. Hincks and Mr. Drummond, both heading to Ottawa. The commercial importance of that river to the colony's prosperity had encouraged them to make this trip to observe and examine what steps would be best to improve its navigation.

My intention was to start at once for Kingston; but when they kindly asked me to accompany them, I joyfully accepted, and an hour after I landed at Montreal I was on the rail with my friends, hissing away to Lachine, where the chief office of the Hudson's Bay Company is fixed. There we embarked in a steamer on Lake St. Louis, which is a struggling compound of the dark brown Ottawa and the light blue St. Lawrence. The lake was studded with islands, and the scenery rendered peculiarly lovely by the ever-changing lights and shades from the rising sun. We soon left the St. Lawrence compound and reached that part of the Ottawa[AQ] which the poet has immortalized by his beautiful "Canadian Boat Song."

My plan was to head straight for Kingston, but when they kindly invited me to join them, I happily agreed. An hour after I arrived in Montreal, I was on the train with my friends, whizzing away to Lachine, where the main office of the Hudson's Bay Company is located. From there, we boarded a steamer on Lake St. Louis, which is a mix of the dark brown Ottawa and the light blue St. Lawrence. The lake was dotted with islands, and the scenery was exceptionally beautiful thanks to the ever-changing light and shadows from the rising sun. We quickly left the St. Lawrence mix and reached the part of the Ottawa[AQ] that the poet immortalized in his lovely "Canadian Boat Song."

St. Anne's is a small village, and the rapids being impassable in low water they have built a lock to enable steamers to ascend; but fortunately, when we passed, there was sufficient water, and we steamed up the song-famed rapids, above which the river spreads out into the Lake of the Two Mountains. It is proposed to build a railway bridge for the main trunk line, just above the rapids. How utterly the whizzing, whistling kettle spoils the poetry of scenery, undeniable though its utility be! There is no doubt that the Lake of the Two Mountains has many great beauties; but, whatever they may be, a merciless storm of rain effectually curtained them from us, and we traversed the whole lake to Point Fortune in a mist worthy of the Western Highlands. There we took coach, as the locks at Carillon are not yet large enough for full-sized steamers to pass. The road was alike good and uninteresting, running by the side of the canal, whose banks were here and there enlivened by groups of wild flowers.

St. Anne's is a small village, and since the rapids are impassable during low water, they've built a lock to allow steamers to go upstream. Fortunately, when we passed through, there was enough water, and we navigated the famous rapids, above which the river expands into the Lake of the Two Mountains. There's a plan to build a railway bridge for the main line just above the rapids. It's amazing how the noisy, whistling steam engine destroys the beauty of the scenery, even though it’s undeniably useful! There’s no doubt that the Lake of the Two Mountains has many great attractions, but whatever they are, a relentless rainstorm effectively hid them from us, and we crossed the entire lake to Point Fortune in a mist that would be fitting for the Western Highlands. There, we took a coach since the locks at Carillon aren’t big enough for full-sized steamers to pass yet. The road was decent but unremarkable, running alongside the canal, with its banks occasionally brightened by clusters of wildflowers.

A stage of twelve miles brought us to Grenville, where we again took steamer on the Ottawa, and, the weather being finer, we had an opportunity of enjoying the scenery, which is very peculiar. It has none of the wild features of grandeur which one associates with comparatively unknown streams, in a country where all is gigantesque. There is nothing mountainous or craggy, but the banks and hills at the back being luxuriously wooded, and conveying the idea of being well tenanted, the absence of human habitations seems unnatural, and gives the solitude an air of mystery, only broken at long intervals by a bowered cottage or a wreath of smoke. The most remarkable building is the French château of M. Papineau, very prettily situated on the northern bank, commanding an extensive view of the river, and looking in its isolation as though its occupant was a second Robinson Crusoe, and monarch of all he surveyed. Night soon buried all scenery in its sable mantle, and, after sixty miles steaming, we reached Bytown, where we found friends and conveyances ready to take us over to Aylmer, there to sleep preparatory to a further excursion up the river early in the morning. As the distance was only eight miles, we were soon at Mr. Egan's hospitable board, from which we speedily retired to rest, so as to be ready for the morrow's trip.

A twelve-mile journey brought us to Grenville, where we again boarded a steamer on the Ottawa. With better weather this time, we had a chance to enjoy the scenery, which is quite unique. It lacks the wild grandeur often associated with lesser-known rivers in a country filled with gigantic landscapes. There are no mountains or rugged cliffs, but the banks and hills behind are lushly wooded, suggesting a thriving ecosystem. The lack of visible human dwellings feels unnatural, giving the solitude a mysterious vibe, occasionally interrupted by a hidden cottage or a wisp of smoke. The most notable building is the French château of M. Papineau, beautifully located on the northern bank with a broad view of the river. In its isolation, it resembles a second Robinson Crusoe, ruling over all he sees. Night quickly wrapped everything in darkness, and after sixty miles of steaming, we arrived at Bytown, where friends and transportation were ready to take us to Aylmer for the night, preparing for another river trip early the next morning. Since it was only an eight-mile distance, we soon arrived at Mr. Egan's welcoming table, from which we quickly went to bed to be ready for the adventure ahead.

Early dawn found us on hoard and steaming merrily up the glorious stream, which, spreading out very widely, has been lakefied, and is called Lake Chaudière and Du Chêne, thus named, I suppose, because the water is cold and there are few oaks to be seen. Be that as it may, the scenery, though possessing neither striking features nor variety, is very pretty and cheerful. A quantity of lovely little villas stud the banks, some ensconced snugly in cosy nooks, others standing out boldly upon the rich greensward; and, for a background, you have full-bosomed hills, rich in forest monarchs, clad in their dense and dark mantles. Suddenly the scene changes, the Chats Falls burst upon the sight; and well does the magnificent view repay the traveller for any difficulty he may have had in his endeavours to reach this spot. About three miles above the rocky and well-wooded island that creates the falls, the river contracts very considerably, and in its rushing impetuosity seems as though it were determined to sweep the whole island into the lake below; then there appears to have been a compromise between the indignant stream and the obstinate island, and the latter seems to have offered up a great portion of its timber at the shrine of Peace, and to have further granted various rights of way to its excited neighbour. The river seems to have taken advantage of both these concessions very largely, but it appears that in nature, as it often occurs in politics, concessions only breed increased demands, and the ungrateful Ottawa, while sweeping away forest timber and baring the granite rock in a dozen different channels, thunders its foaming waters along with an angry voice, ever crying "More, more."

Early dawn found us on board, happily steaming up the beautiful river, which widens into what’s now called Lake Chaudière and Du Chêne. I guess it got this name because the water is cold and there aren’t many oaks around. Regardless, the scenery, while lacking in dramatic features or variety, is quite lovely and cheerful. There are lots of charming little villas lining the banks, some tucked away in cozy spots, while others boldly showcase themselves on the vibrant green grass. In the background, there are lush hills, rich with tall trees dressed in their thick, dark leaves. Suddenly, the landscape shifts as the Chats Falls come into view, and the stunning sight definitely rewards any traveler for the effort it took to get here. About three miles upstream from the rocky, well-wooded island that forms the falls, the river narrows significantly, and its rushing force seems intent on sweeping the entire island into the lake below. Then it looks like there was a compromise between the furious river and the stubborn island, with the island surrendering a large part of its trees for the sake of peace and granting access rights to its eager neighbor. The river seems to have taken full advantage of these concessions, but just like in politics, negotiations often lead to more demands. The ungrateful Ottawa, while carrying away forest timber and exposing granite rock in numerous channels, thunders its foamy waters with an angry roars, always crying out, "More, more."

I never saw anything more beautiful than these falls. They are generally from twenty to forty feet broad, and about the same in height; but from the shape of the island you cannot see them all at once; and as you steam along there is a continual succession of them, each revealing some new beauty. It was at this place that I, for the first time, saw a slide for the descent of lumber, to which I shall have to refer hereafter. For many years the porterage of goods across this island to the Ottawa above—which is called Lake Chats—was a work of much difficulty and expense. Mr. E., with that enterprise and energy which mark his character, got two friends of kindred spirit to join him, and made a railway across, about three miles and a half long. It is a single line, constructed upon piles, and the car is rattled over at a jolly pace by two spicy ponies. As the piles are in some places from twenty to thirty feet in the air, it looks nervous work; and if one of the ponies bolted, it might produce a serious accident; but they seem aware of the danger, and trot away as steadily as an engine, if not quite so rapidly.

I never saw anything more beautiful than these waterfalls. They're usually between twenty and forty feet wide and about the same in height. However, because of the shape of the island, you can't see them all at once. As you go along, there’s a constant flow of them, each one showing a new kind of beauty. It was here that I first saw a slide for lumber, which I'll mention again later. For many years, transporting goods across this island to the Ottawa River above—known as Lake Chats—was really challenging and costly. Mr. E., with his typical drive and energy, teamed up with two like-minded friends to build a railway about three and a half miles long. It’s a single track built on piles, and the car speeds along at a fun pace, pulled by two spirited ponies. Since the piles are, in some spots, twenty to thirty feet high, it looks a bit scary, and if one of the ponies took off, it could lead to a serious accident. But they seem to know the risks and trot along as steadily as a train, if not quite as fast.

On reaching the north-western end of the island, another steamer was waiting for us, and we again breasted the stream of the Ottawa. After passing the first three miles, which, as before mentioned, are very narrow, and thus produce that additional impetus which ends in the lovely Chats Falls, the river opens out into the Lake. The shores are low and with a gentle rise, and there is comparatively little appearance of agricultural activity, the settler having found the ground at the back of the rise better suited for farming purposes.

On reaching the north-western tip of the island, another steamer was waiting for us, and we made our way up the Ottawa River again. After we passed the first three miles, which, as mentioned earlier, are very narrow and create an extra push that leads to the beautiful Chats Falls, the river opens up into the lake. The shores are low and gently sloping, and there isn't much sign of farming activity, as the settlers have found the land behind the rise to be better for agriculture.

Some distance up the lake, and close to its margin, is the farm of Mr. McDonnell, thus forming an exception to the general rule. His residence is an excessively pretty cottage, commanding a grand panoramic view. Here we stopped to pay a visit to the energetic old Highlander and his family, and to enjoy his hospitalities. If he is to be taken as a specimen of the salubrity of the climate, I never saw so healthy a place. He came here as a lad to push his fortunes, with nothing but a good axe and a stout heart. He has left fifty summers far behind him; he looks the embodiment of health, and he carries his six feet two inches in a way that might well excite the envy of a model drill-sergeant; and when he took my hand to welcome me, I felt all my little bones scrunching under his iron grasp, as if they were so many bits of pith.

Some distance up the lake, close to the edge, is Mr. McDonnell's farm, making it an exception to the usual surroundings. His home is a really charming cottage with an amazing panoramic view. We stopped here to visit the energetic old Highlander and his family, and to enjoy his hospitality. If he’s any indication of the climate’s healthiness, I’ve never seen a place so vibrant. He came here as a young man to seek his fortune, armed with just a good axe and a strong will. He’s left behind fifty summers; he looks like the picture of health and carries his six feet two inches in a way that could easily make a drill-sergeant jealous. When he took my hand to welcome me, I felt all my little bones crunching under his powerful grip, as if they were just bits of cork.

I could not help contrasting the heartiness of his welcome with the two stiff fingers which in highly-civilized life are so often proffered either from pride or indifference; and though he did very nearly make me cry "Enough!" I would a thousand times rather suffer and enjoy his hearty grasp than the cold formality of conventional humbug. The hardy old pioneer has realized a very comfortable independence, and he told me his only neighbours were a band of his countrymen at the back of the hill, who speak Gaelic exclusively and scarce know a word of English. They mostly came out with "The Macnab," but from time to time they are refreshed by arrivals from the Old Country.

I couldn't help but compare the warmth of his welcome to the two stiff fingers that are often offered in our overly-civilized world, whether out of pride or indifference. Even though he nearly made me cry out "Enough!" I would much rather experience his hearty grip than the cold formality of conventional pretense. This rugged old pioneer has achieved a comfortable independence, and he told me his only neighbors are a group of his countrymen living over the hill who speak Gaelic exclusively and hardly know any English. Most of them came over with "The Macnab," but now and then they get new arrivals from the Old Country.

Having a long day's work before us, we were enabled to make but a short stay, so, bidding him and his family a sincere good-bye and good speed, we renewed our journey. We soon came in sight of the black stumpy monuments of one of the most disastrous conflagrations which ever victimized a forest. Some idea may be formed of the ravages of the "devouring element," from the simple fact that it all but totally consumed every stick of timber covering a space of forty-five miles by twenty-five; and the value of what was thus destroyed may be partially estimated, when it is considered that one good raft of timber is worth from three to five thousand pounds. These rafts, which are seen dotted about the lake in every direction, have a very pretty effect, with their little distinguishing flags floating in the breeze, some from the top of a pole, some from the top of the little shanty in which their hardy navigators live; and a dreary, fatiguing, and dangerous career it must be; but Providence, in his mercy, has so constituted man, that habit grows into a new nature; and these hardy sons of creation sing as merrily, smile as cheerfully, smoke as calmly, and unquestionably sleep as soundly, as any veteran in idleness, though pampered with luxuries, and with a balance at his banker's which he is at a loss how to squander.

After a long day's work ahead of us, we could only stay for a short time. So, after saying a heartfelt goodbye to him and his family, we continued on our journey. Soon, we saw the blackened, charred remains of one of the most devastating fires that ever struck a forest. You can get an idea of the destruction caused by this "devouring element" when you consider that it nearly wiped out every tree over an area of forty-five miles by twenty-five. The value of what was lost can be somewhat estimated, knowing that a single good timber raft is worth between three to five thousand pounds. These rafts, seen spread out across the lake in every direction, create a lovely sight with their little flags fluttering in the breeze—some flying from the top of a pole, others from the roof of the small cabin where their rugged sailors live. It must be a dreary, tiring, and dangerous job; but thankfully, human beings adapt, and what starts as hardship can become second nature. These tough workers sing happily, smile cheerfully, smoke calmly, and sleep soundly, just like any wealthy person idling around in luxury, unsure of how to spend their money.

These sons of toil bear practical testimony to the truth of what the late lamented Sir J. Franklin always declared to be his conviction, from long experience, viz., that the use of spirits is enfeebling rather than invigorating to those who have to work in the most severe climates. The Lumberers are nearly all teetotallers, and I am told they declare that they find their health bettered, their endurance strengthened, their muscles hardened, and their spirits enlivened by the change. If this be so, and if we find that the natives of warm climates are, as a mass, also teetotallers, and that when they forsake their temperance colours they deteriorate and eventually disappear, I fear we must come to the conclusion, that however delicious iced champagne or sherry-cobbler may be, or however enjoyable "a long pull at the pewter-pot," they are not in any way necessary to health or cheerfulness, and that, like all actions, they have their reactions, and thus create a desire for their repetition, until by habit they become a second nature, to the great comfort and consolation of worthy wine-merchants and fashionable medical men, whose balance-sheets would suffer about equally by the discontinuance of their use; not to mention the sad effects of their misuse, as daily exhibited in police reports and other features, if possible worse, which the records of "hells" would reveal.

These hardworking individuals provide clear evidence of what the late Sir J. Franklin always believed based on his extensive experience: that drinking alcohol weakens rather than strengthens those who have to labor in harsh climates. Most lumberjacks are completely sober, and I hear they claim that their health improves, their stamina increases, their muscles become stronger, and their spirits lift with this lifestyle change. If that’s true, and if we observe that people from warm climates tend to be mostly sober as well, and that when they abandon their temperance, they suffer and sometimes disappear, we may have to conclude that, no matter how enjoyable iced champagne or sherry-cobbler might be, or how fun “a long pull at the pewter-pot” seems, they aren’t necessary for health or happiness. Like all habits, they create a desire for more, until they eventually become second nature, much to the benefit of the profitable wine merchants and trendy doctors, whose finances would be similarly impacted by a reduction in their use; let alone the troubling consequences of their misuse, as often shown in police reports and, even worse, the records of “hells.”

So strong does the passion become, that I know of a lady who weighs nearly a ton, and is proud of displaying more of her precious substance than society generally approves of, in whom the taste "for a wee drop" is so strong, that, to enable her to gratify it more freely, she has the pleasure of paying two medical men a guinea each daily, to stave off as long as they can its insidious attacks upon her gigantic frame. You must not, however, suppose that I am a teetotaller. I have tried it, and never found myself better than while practising it; still I never lose a chance if a bottle of iced champagne is circulating, for I confess—I love it dearly.

The passion can get so intense that I know a woman who weighs almost a ton and takes pride in showing off more of her body than society normally accepts. Her craving for "a little drink" is so strong that she happily pays two doctors a guinea each every day to help keep its sneaky effects at bay as long as possible for her enormous size. However, don't think I'm a teetotaler. I've tried it, and I didn't feel any better while doing it; still, I never miss an opportunity when there's a bottle of iced champagne going around, because I admit—I love it a lot.

Pardon this digression.—We are again on the Ottawa; as we advance, the river narrows and becomes studded with little islands covered with wild shrubs and forest trees, from whose stiff unyielding boughs the more pliant shoots droop playfully into the foaming stream below, like the children of Gravity coquetting with the family of Passion. Of course these islands form rapids in every direction: we soon, approach the one selected as the channel in which to try our strength. On we dash boldly—down rushes the stream with a roar of defiance; arrived midway, a deadly struggle ensues between boiling water and running water; we tremble in the balance of victory—the rushing waters triumph; we sound a retreat, which is put in practice with the caution of a Xenophon, and down we glide into the stiller waters below.

Pardon this side note. We’re back on the Ottawa River; as we move forward, the river narrows and is dotted with small islands filled with wild shrubs and trees. Their stiff branches bend playfully into the foaming water below, like gravity's children flirting with passion. Naturally, these islands create rapids in every direction: soon, we approach the one chosen as the course to test our strength. We rush in confidently—down comes the stream with a roar of challenge; halfway in, a fierce struggle happens between the churning water and the flowing water; we hang in the balance of victory—the rushing waters win; we sound a retreat, executed with the caution of a master strategist, and we glide down into the calmer waters below.

Poke the fires,—pile the coals! Again we dash onwards—again we reach midway—again the moment of struggle—again the ignominy of defeat—again the council of war in the stiller waters below. We now summon all our energies, determined that defeat shall but nerve us to greater exertion. We go lower down, so as to obtain greater initial velocity; the fires are made to glow one spotless mass of living heat. Again the charge is sounded: on we rush, our little boat throbbing from stem to stern; again the angry waters roar defiance—again the deadly struggle—again for a moment we tremble in the balance of victory. Suddenly a universal shout of triumph is heard, and as the joyous cheers die in echoes through the forest, we are breasting the smoother waters of the Ottawa above the rapids.

Poke the fires—stack the coals! We’re charging ahead again—reaching the midpoint once more—facing the struggle again—the shame of defeat returns—once more we hold our war council in the calmer waters below. We’re ready to summon all our energy, determined that defeat will only push us to try harder. We go lower to gain more speed at the start; the fires blaze into one bright mass of living heat. Again the signal to charge goes out: we rush forward, our little boat vibrating from bow to stern; once again the furious waters challenge us—again the fierce struggle—again we teeter on the edge of victory. Suddenly, a triumphant shout rings out, and as the joyous cheers fade into echoes through the forest, we are cutting through the calmer waters of the Ottawa above the rapids.

This is all very well on paper, but I assure you it was a time of intense excitement to us; if in the moment of deadly struggle the tiller ropes had broken, or the helmsman had made one false turn of the wheel, we might have got across the boiling rapids, and then good-bye to sublunary friends; our bones might have been floating past Quebec before the news of our destruction had reached it.

This sounds great in theory, but I promise you it was a time of intense excitement for us; if, in the heat of the moment, the steering ropes had snapped, or the captain had made even one wrong move on the wheel, we might have made it through the rough rapids, and then it would have been goodbye to everyone on Earth; our bones could have been floating past Quebec before anyone even heard about our disaster.

The Ottawa is by no means the only channel in these parts for conveying the produce of the lumberer's toil: there are tributaries innumerable, affording hundreds of miles of raft navigation; so that an almost indefinite field for their labour is open, and years, if not centuries, must elapse before the population can increase sufficiently to effect any very material inroad on these all but inexhaustible forests.

The Ottawa isn't the only river around here that transports the fruits of lumberjacks' work: there are countless tributaries offering hundreds of miles of raft navigation. This means there's an almost unlimited area for their efforts, and it will take years, if not centuries, before the population grows enough to make a significant dent in these nearly endless forests.

After proceeding a few miles beyond the scene of our late severe struggle, we reached the little village of Portage du Fort, above which the rapids are perfectly impassable. The inhabitants of this little wild forest community are not very numerous, as may be supposed, and the only object of interest is a flour-mill, which supplies the lumberers for many miles, both above and below. Our little steamer being unable to ascend higher, we were compelled to make a Scotchman's cruise of it—"There and bock agin." So, turning our head eastward, we bowled along merrily with the stream, dashing down our late antagonist like a flash of lightning, then across the lake, and through a fleet of bannered rafts, till we landed on the Chats Falls Island, where we found our ponies ready to whisk us along the mid-air railway. Re-embarking on the steamer of the morning, we found a capital dinner ready for us, and ere the shades of evening had closed in, we were once more enjoying the hospitalities of Aylmer.

After going a few miles past the site of our recent tough struggle, we arrived at the small village of Portage du Fort, above which the rapids are completely impassable. The residents of this little forest community are not very many, as you might expect, and the only point of interest is a flour mill that supplies lumberjacks for many miles both upstream and downstream. Our little steamer couldn't go any higher, so we had to take a Scottish approach—"There and back again." So, turning east, we sped along with the current, rushing down our former adversary like a bolt of lightning, then across the lake, and through a flotilla of rafts with banners, until we landed on Chats Falls Island, where we found our ponies ready to take us along the sky railway. After boarding the morning steamer again, we discovered a fantastic dinner waiting for us, and before the evening shadows fell, we were once again enjoying the warm hospitality of Aylmer.

Aylmer has only a population of 1100 inhabitants, but they are not idle. The house of Mr. E. does business with the lumberers to the tune of 200,000l. annually, and supplies them with 15,000 lb. of tea every year. Grog-shops are at a discount in these parts. The increasing prosperity of this neighbourhood is mainly owing to the energy and enterprise of Mr. Egan and his friend M. Aumond. It was by these two gentlemen that the steam-boats were put on the lakes, and the rail made across the island. Everybody feels how much the facility of conveyance has increased the prosperity of this locality; and the value of Mr. E.'s services is honourably recognised, by his unopposed election as the representative of the district. Having had a good night's rest, and taken in a substantial breakfast, we started off on our return to Bytown, which city may he considered as the headquarters of the lumberers.

Aylmer has a population of only 1,100 residents, but they are not idle. Mr. E.'s business caters to lumberjacks with an annual trade of 200,000l and supplies them with 15,000 lb. of tea each year. There aren't many bars in this area. The growing success of this community is largely due to the hard work and initiative of Mr. Egan and his friend M. Aumond. These two gentlemen are responsible for introducing steam boats on the lakes and building the railway across the island. Everyone recognizes that the improved transportation has greatly boosted the prosperity of this area; Mr. E.'s contributions are duly acknowledged by his uncontested election as the district representative. After a good night's sleep and a hearty breakfast, we set off on our return to Bytown, which can be considered the hub of the lumber industry.

The ground upon which the greater part of Bytown stands was offered some years since to a servant, as payment for a debt of 70l.; he found the bargain so bad, that he tried to get out of it. The value of the same land is now estimated at 200,000l.!!! As late as 1826, there was not one stone put upon another; now the population is 10,000, and steadily increasing. Nothing can exceed the beauty of the panoramic view from the verge of the Barrack Hill, which is a dark, frowning, perpendicular rock several hundred feet high. To the west are the Chaudière Falls, 200 feet broad and 60 feet high, irregular in shape, and broken here and there by rocks, around which the rapids leap in unceasing frenzy, ere they take their last plunge into the maddened gulf below, thence rolling their dark waters beneath your feet. Below the falls the river is spanned by a very light and beautiful suspension-bridge. This part of the scene is enlivened by the continual descent of timber-rafts rushing down the slides, skilfully guided by their hardy and experienced navigators. Around you is a splendid expanse of waving field and sombre forest, far as the eye can stretch, and bounded towards the north by mountains looming and half lost in distance, whence comes the mighty Gatineau—a watery highway for forest treasure, threading its course like a stream of liquid silver as the sun's rays dance upon its bosom,—the whole forming one of the most beautiful panoramas imaginable.

The land where most of Bytown is located was given to a servant years ago as payment for a debt of 70l. He thought the deal was so awful that he tried to back out of it. Now, that same land is valued at 200,000l!!! As recently as 1826, there wasn't a single building; now the population is at 10,000 and steadily growing. The panoramic view from the edge of Barrack Hill is incredibly stunning. It’s a steep, dark rock rising several hundred feet high. To the west, the Chaudière Falls span 200 feet wide and drop 60 feet, with an irregular shape, broken up by rocks, with rapids crashing down in an endless frenzy before plunging into the wild whirlpool below, sending dark waters rolling beneath you. Below the falls, a light and beautiful suspension bridge crosses the river. This part of the scene is animated by timber rafts rushing down the slides, skillfully navigated by their tough and experienced crew. Surrounding you is a vast expanse of swaying fields and dark forests as far as the eye can see, bounded to the north by mountains that fade into the distance, from which the mighty Gatineau flows—a waterway carrying forest riches, glistening like a stream of liquid silver as the sun’s rays dance across its surface—creating one of the most breathtaking panoramas imaginable.

No place was ever better calculated for the capital of a great country. Bordering upon Upper and Lower Canada, only twelve hours from Montreal, easily capable of defence, with a trade increasing in value as rapidly as the source thereof is inexhaustible, at the confluence of two rivers whose banks are alike rich in timber and arable land—requiring but nineteen miles of lockage to unite the St. Lawrence, the Ottawa, and the Gatineau with the boundless inland lakes of America—possessing the magnificent Rideau Canal, which affords a ready transport down to Kingston on Lake Ontario—rich with scenery, unsurpassed in beauty and grandeur, and enjoying a climate as healthy as any the world can produce,—Nature seems to have marked out Bytown as the site for a Canadian metropolis. In short, were I a prophet instead of a traveller, I should boldly predict that such it must be some day, if Canada remain united and independent.

No place was ever better suited for the capital of a great country. Located near Upper and Lower Canada, only twelve hours from Montreal, easily defensible, with trade growing in value as fast as its source is endless, at the meeting point of two rivers with banks rich in timber and farmland—requiring just nineteen miles of locks to connect the St. Lawrence, the Ottawa, and the Gatineau with the vast inland lakes of America—boasting the impressive Rideau Canal, which provides easy transport down to Kingston on Lake Ontario—filled with scenery unmatched in beauty and grandeur, and enjoying a climate as healthy as any in the world—Nature seems to have chosen Bytown as the location for a Canadian capital. In short, if I were a prophet instead of a traveler, I would confidently predict that it will be, one day, if Canada stays united and independent.

I must here explain the slides for lumber, before alluded to. In days gone by, all lumber was shot down the rapids, to find its way as best it could, the natural consequence being that large quantities were irrecoverably lost. It occurred to Mr. Wright that this waste of toil and timber might be obviated, and he accordingly, after great labour and expense, succeeded in inventing what is termed a slide—in other words, an inclined wooden frame—upon which a certain number of the huge logs that compose a portion of a raft can be floated down together in perfect security, under the guidance of one or two expert men. The invention answered admirably, as is proved by the fact that, through its instrumentality, timber which formerly took two seasons to reach Quebec, now does so in five months. Like many other inventors, I fear Mr. Wright has not received justice at the hands of the Government, who, by building slides of their own, and granting advantages to those who use them, have thus removed the traffic from Mr. Wright's—an injustice which it is to be hoped it is not too late to repair; at all events, the Imperial Legislature, which felt bound to vote 4000l. to a man that invented a machine for making little holes between penny stamps, on the ground of commercial utility, must agree with me that it is unworthy of a lumbering colony to neglect the claims of a man whose invention has proved to be a benefit to the lumber trade, absolutely beyond calculation.

I need to explain the slides for lumber I mentioned earlier. In the past, all lumber was sent down the rapids, trying to find its way as best as it could, and a lot of it was lost forever. Mr. Wright realized that this waste of effort and timber could be avoided. After significant work and expense, he invented what we now call a slide—essentially, an inclined wooden frame—where a group of large logs that make up part of a raft can be floated down safely with the help of one or two skilled people. This invention worked exceptionally well, as demonstrated by the fact that timber that used to take two seasons to reach Quebec now gets there in five months. Like many other inventors, I'm afraid Mr. Wright hasn’t received fair treatment from the Government, who, by building their own slides and giving advantages to those who use them, have taken traffic away from Mr. Wright's designs—an injustice that hopefully isn't too late to fix. Regardless, the Imperial Legislature, which felt it necessary to allocate £4000 to a man who invented a machine for creating small holes between penny stamps for commercial reasons, must agree that it’s not right for a lumbering colony to overlook the contributions of someone whose invention has been an immeasurable benefit to the lumber industry.

The chief proprietor at Bytown is the Hon. Mr. Mackay, and of his career in Canada he may indeed be justly proud. Arriving in the country as a labourer without a friend, he has, by his integrity and intellectual capability, fought his way up nobly to the highest position in the colony, and is one of the most respected members of the Legislative Council. Nor has he, while battling for senatorial honours, neglected his more material interests, and the energy he has brought to bear upon them has been rewarded to his heart's desire. He has a charming little country place, called Rideau Hall, about three miles out of town, and is the owner of several carding, saw, and flour mills, besides an extensive cloth factory, from the produce of which I am at this moment most comfortably clad. Mr. Mackay's career may fairly be termed a useful colonial monument, to encourage the aspirations of noble ambition, and to scourge the consciences of those drones who always see "a lion in the way." We had the pleasure of enjoying his hospitalities at a grand breakfast which he gave in honour of my two travelling friends, who were, I believe, the first members of the Executive Council that had been here for very many years.

The main owner in Bytown is the Hon. Mr. Mackay, and he can truly be proud of his career in Canada. Arriving in the country as a laborer without any connections, he has, through his integrity and intelligence, worked his way up to the highest position in the colony and is one of the most respected members of the Legislative Council. While striving for senatorial honors, he has also taken care of his more practical interests, and the effort he has put into them has paid off beautifully. He has a lovely little country home called Rideau Hall, about three miles outside of town, and owns several carding, saw, and flour mills, as well as a large cloth factory, the products of which I am currently enjoying as my comfortable clothing. Mr. Mackay's career can be seen as a significant colonial achievement that inspires noble ambition and challenges those lazy individuals who always see obstacles. We had the pleasure of enjoying his hospitality at a grand breakfast he hosted in honor of my two traveling friends, who I believe were the first members of the Executive Council to visit here in many years.

One object of their present visit was to ascertain, from personal observation and inquiry, how far it was desirable the Government should grant money for the purpose of making any of the locks requisite to connect the Ottawa, &c., with Montreal and Quebec. I cannot for an instant doubt their being most thoroughly convinced both of its perfect practicability and of its immense importance. It only requires the construction of nineteen miles of canal, to complete an unbroken water communication from Quebec to the Ottawa and all its gigantic tributaries, extending even to Lake Temiscaming; and if a canal were cut from this latter to Lake Nipissing, the communication would then be complete through the heart of Canada across all the inland ocean waters of the American continent, and thence to New York viâ Erie Canal and Hudson, or to New Orleans viâ Illinois Canal, River, and Mississippi. Already 50,000l. have been, voted for this purpose, and this first instalment is mainly due to the energy of Mr. Egan. As a mark of respect for their representative, he was to be honoured with a public dinner, at which my two companions of the Executive Council were to attend. Unfortunately, my time was limited, and I was obliged to decline participating in the compliment which Mr. Egan had so well earned; so, bidding adieu to my friends, and casting one last and lingering glance at that glorious panorama—the remembrance of which time can never efface, I got into an open shay, and began prosecuting my solitary way towards Prescott.

One reason for their visit was to find out, through personal observation and inquiry, how much the Government should invest in building locks to connect the Ottawa, etc., with Montreal and Quebec. I can't doubt they are completely convinced of its practicality and significance. It only requires building nineteen miles of canal to create a continuous water route from Quebec to the Ottawa and all its massive tributaries, even extending to Lake Temiscaming. If a canal were built from there to Lake Nipissing, the route would then be complete through the heart of Canada, across all the inland waterways of the American continent, and on to New York via the Erie Canal and Hudson, or to New Orleans via the Illinois Canal, River, and Mississippi. So far, £50,000 have been allocated for this purpose, and this initial funding is largely thanks to Mr. Egan's efforts. As a sign of respect for their representative, he was to be honored with a public dinner, which my two colleagues from the Executive Council were attending. Unfortunately, my time was limited, and I had to decline participating in the honor that Mr. Egan had rightfully earned. So, bidding farewell to my friends and casting one last, lingering look at that stunning view—the memory of which time will never erase—I got into an open carriage and continued my solitary journey toward Prescott.

I left the hotel as the guests were all arriving, and the fumes of the coming feast proclaiming in the most appetizing way the object of their meeting. I had two hours' daylight still left, and thus was enabled to see a little of that part of the neighbourhood, which alone was concealed when standing on the Barrack-hill. The more I saw of it, the more convinced was I of the peculiar adaptation of Bytown for a great city; the ground is admirably suited for building, and possesses a water-power which is inexhaustible. My road, as may naturally be supposed in a new country, lay through alternations of forest and cultivation; if it was not well macadamized, at least it was far better than I had expected, and there is some pleasure in being agreeably disappointed, and able to jog along without eternally bumping in some deep rut, which shakes the ash off your cigar inside your waistcoat. Here and there, of course, I came across a break-neck tract, but that only made the contrast more enjoyable.

I left the hotel just as the guests were arriving, with the delicious smells of the upcoming feast announcing the purpose of their gathering. I still had two hours of daylight left, which allowed me to explore a bit of the neighborhood that was hidden from view while standing on Barrack Hill. The more I discovered, the more I was convinced that Bytown was uniquely suited to become a great city; the land is perfect for building and has an endless supply of water power. My path, as you might expect in a new country, took me through a mix of forest and farmland; while it wasn't perfectly paved, it was much better than I anticipated, and there's something nice about being pleasantly surprised and able to ride smoothly without constantly bouncing in some deep rut that knocks the ash off your cigar inside your jacket. Here and there, I did encounter a rough patch, but that only made the smooth parts more enjoyable.

At half-past twelve at night the little horses began to feel the effects of six hours' work, so I stopped at a tolerably miserable wayside inn for four hours, which was distributed between washing, feeding, and sleeping. Sharp work, but I was anxious to catch the steamer; so, snatching what rest I could out of that brief period, and hoping the horses had done the same, I was again en route at 5 A.M., and by great exertions reached Prescott in good time to learn that the steamer had started half an hour before my arrival. I consoled myself, as well as I could, with a washing basin, a teapot, and auxiliaries. I then went to look at the town, which consists of about three streets, and 3000 inhabitants; so that operation was accomplished without trouble, interest, or much loss of time. Ascertaining that if I went over to Ogdensburg, I could catch a steamer at 2 P.M., I ferried across instanter, wishing to get a look at Brother Jonathan's town before starting. A comparison between the two was not flattering to my national vanity. Instead of finding a population of 3000, with no indication of progress, I found a population of 8000, with go-aheadism in all quarters; large houses, large streets, and active prosperity stamped on everything. Doubtless this disparity is greatly owing to the railway, by which the latter is connected with the whole State of New York, and also from the want of reciprocity. Nevertheless, there is a stamp of energy at Ogdensburg, which the most careless observer cannot but see is wanting at Prescott.

At 12:30 a.m., the horses started to show the effects of six hours of work, so I stopped at a rather shabby roadside inn for four hours, which I used for washing, feeding, and sleeping. It was a tough grind, but I was eager to catch the steamer. So, grabbing whatever rest I could during that short time, and hoping the horses did the same, I was back on the road by 5 a.m. After a lot of effort, I reached Prescott just in time to find out that the steamer had left half an hour before I arrived. I tried to console myself with a washbasin, a teapot, and some supplies. Then I went to have a look at the town, which has about three streets and 3,000 residents; so that visit didn't take much effort, interest, or time. I found out that if I went over to Ogdensburg, I could catch a steamer at 2 p.m., so I quickly took the ferry, wanting to see Brother Jonathan's town before I set off. Comparing the two towns wasn't great for my national pride. Instead of a population of 3,000 with no signs of progress, I found a population of 8,000 with a vibe of ambition everywhere; big houses, wide streets, and a sense of thriving prosperity all around. This difference is probably largely due to the railway connecting the latter with all of New York State, as well as the lack of reciprocity. Still, there’s an energy in Ogdensburg that anyone can see is missing in Prescott.

Mr. Parish is the great proprietor at the former of these towns, and is said to be a man of considerable wealth, which he appears to be employing alike usefully and profitably—viz., in reclaiming from the lake a piece of land, about four hundred square yards, adjoining the railway terminus, by which means vessels will be able to unload readily on his new wharf; the reclaimed ground will thereby acquire an enormous value for storehouses.

Mr. Parish is the main owner in the former of these towns, and he is said to be quite wealthy, which he seems to be using in both a productive and profitable way—specifically, by reclaiming about four hundred square yards of land from the lake next to the railway terminal. This will allow ships to easily unload at his new wharf, significantly increasing the value of the reclaimed land for warehouses.

Having finished my observations, and been well baked by a vertical sun, I embarked at 2 P.M. Lovely weather and lovely scenery.

Having wrapped up my observations and gotten thoroughly baked by the noon sun, I set off at 2 PM. Beautiful weather and beautiful scenery.

The village of Brockville is very prettily situated on the banks of the lake, and is considered one of the prettiest towns in Canada. Continuing our course, numberless neat little villages and lovely villas appear from time to time; but when fairly on the Lake of The Thousand Isles, the scenery is altogether charming, and some new beauty is constantly bursting into view. Upon the present occasion the scene was rendered more striking by the perfect reflection of all the islands upon the burnished bosom of the glassy lake. We reached Cape Vincent towards evening, and, changing into another steamer, landed safely at Kingston about ten at night, where, finding a young artillery friend, I was soon immersed in that most absorbing of all pleasures to one long from home—viz., talking over old friends and old scenes, until you feel as though you were among both of them. Night, however, has its claims upon man, and, being honest, I discharged my obligation by going to bed as the tell-tale clock struck three.

The village of Brockville is beautifully located along the lake and is regarded as one of the most picturesque towns in Canada. As we continued our journey, countless charming little villages and beautiful homes appeared now and then; but once we reached the Lake of The Thousand Isles, the scenery was truly enchanting, with new beauty constantly coming into view. That day, the scene was even more striking thanks to the perfect reflection of all the islands on the shiny surface of the smooth lake. We arrived at Cape Vincent in the evening and, after switching to another steamer, reached Kingston safely around ten at night, where I found a young artillery friend. I quickly got caught up in the most enjoyable thing for someone who has been away from home—talking about old friends and familiar places, until it felt like I was back with them. However, night has its demands, and being responsible, I met my obligation by going to bed as the telling clock chimed three.

Kingston is but a small place, though once of considerable importance. The population is about 12,000. In the year 1841, Lord Sydenham having removed the seat of Government from Toronto to Kingston, the inhabitants expended large sums of money in the expectation that it would so continue; but, in 1844, it was removed back again, and consequently a very heavy loss was incurred by those who had laid out their money. It is this eternal shifting about of the seat of Government—the disadvantage of which must be manifest to every one—that makes me hope Bytown, the position of which is so central, may some day be decided upon as the city to enjoy that honour permanently. However much Kingston may be recovering itself, and I was told it is, I must confess that, despite its cathedral, colleges, university, and other fine buildings, which it undoubtedly possesses, the grass in the streets and lanes, the pigs and the cows feeding about in all directions, made me feel ashamed, especially when I thought of young Ogdensburg, which I had so lately left. Taking into consideration the extent of lake communication which it enjoys, and that by the magnificent Rideau Canal the whole country of the Ottawa is open to it, I must say that I consider the state of Kingston the strongest reflection upon the energy and enterprise of the population. The finest view is from the citadel, which commands a splendid panoramic expanse; the fortifications are in good repair, and garrisoned by Canadian Rifles and a few Royal Artillerymen. One of the objects I should have had most interest in visiting was the Provincial Penitentiary, the arrangements of which, I had heard, were admirable; but, as I had no time to see them, the reader is saved the details.

Kingston is a small town, though it was once quite important. The population is about 12,000. In 1841, Lord Sydenham moved the seat of Government from Toronto to Kingston, and the residents spent a lot of money expecting it to stay that way. However, in 1844, it was moved back to Toronto, resulting in significant financial losses for those who had invested. This constant shifting of the seat of Government is clearly a disadvantage for everyone, which makes me hopeful that Bytown, with its central location, might eventually be chosen as the permanent capital. No matter how much Kingston is said to be bouncing back—and I’ve heard it is—I have to admit that despite its cathedral, colleges, university, and other impressive buildings, the overgrown grass in the streets and the pigs and cows wandering everywhere made me feel embarrassed, especially when I thought of young Ogdensburg, which I had just left. Considering the extensive lake access it has and that the beautiful Rideau Canal opens up the entire Ottawa region to it, I think Kingston's current state reflects poorly on the energy and ambition of its residents. The best view of the area is from the citadel, which offers a stunning panoramic sight; the fortifications are well-maintained and garrisoned by Canadian Rifles and a few Royal Artillery troops. One of the places I would have been most interested in visiting was the Provincial Penitentiary, which I heard had excellent facilities, but since I didn't have time to check it out, you’re spared the details.

At 3 P.M., I was again steaming away on Lake Ontario, which soon spreads out into an open sea. The boat was tolerably good and clean, and the food to match, but it was served down below; the cabin was therefore very stuffy. I selected a bed with great care, and in due time got into it, quite delighted with my carefully-chosen position, and soon buried my nose in the pillow, full of peaceful hopes. Luckless mortal! scarce had my nose extracted the cold from its contact with the pillow-case, when a sound came rushing forth with a violence which shook not only me and my bed, but the whole cabin. The tale is soon told. I had built my nest at the muzzle of the whistle of the engine, and, as they made a point of screeching forth the moment anything appeared in sight, you may guess that I had a pleasant night of it, and have scrupulously avoided repeating the experiment in any subsequent steam excursions. Having nobody to blame but myself, I lost the little satisfaction I might have had in abusing somebody else, and calling him a stupid ass for making such a choice. However, as a matter of justice, I abused myself, and the point being beyond dispute, no rejoinder was put in. Pleased with the candour of my confession, I caught such snatches of rest as the engineer and his whistle in mercy vouchsafed me—the next morning we were in Toronto.

At 3 P.M., I was once again cruising on Lake Ontario, which quickly opens up into a vast expanse of water. The boat was decent and clean, and the food matched, but it was served downstairs, making the cabin quite stuffy. I picked my bed carefully and eventually got into it, feeling pleased with my choice. Soon, I buried my nose in the pillow, full of peaceful hopes. Unfortunately! Hardly had my nose absorbed the chill from the pillowcase when a sound erupted with such force that it shook not just me and my bed, but the whole cabin. The story is short. I had chosen a spot right next to the engine’s whistle, and since they always blasted it the moment anything came into view, you can imagine I didn’t have a pleasant night and have made it a point to avoid that mistake on any future steam trips. With no one to blame but myself, I missed out on the satisfaction of blaming someone else and calling them a fool for such a poor choice. However, in a twist of fairness, I ended up cursing myself, and with that argument settled, I had nothing left to say. Pleased with my honesty, I caught whatever bits of sleep the engineer and his whistle allowed me—the next morning, we were in Toronto.


NOTE.—The Bytown mentioned in the foregoing chapter is now called Ottawa, and is a candidate, in conjunction with Montreal and Toronto, for the honour of permanent metropolitanism.

NOTE.—The Bytown mentioned in the previous chapter is now called Ottawa and is a contender, along with Montreal and Toronto, for the title of permanent metropolitan city.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Originally Uttàwa, wherein Moore has shown alike his good taste and respect for antiquity by adhering to the original and more beautiful name.



CHAPTER XX.

Colonial Education and Prosperity.




Toronto is prettily situated, and looks flourishing and prosperous; the way in which property is increasing in value here is wonderful, and the hits some people have made are quite fabulous. A property which had been bought for 30,000l., was, within a month—before even the price was paid in full—resold in lots for 100,000l. The position of the town is admirably adapted for a great commercial city: it possesses a secure harbour; it is situated on a lake about 190 miles long by 50 broad; thence the St. Lawrence carries its produce to the ocean, and the Rideau Canal connects it with the lumberers' home on the Ottawa; the main trunk line of railway, which will extend from the western point of the colony to Halifax, passes through it; a local line, traversing some of the richest land in Canada, is now in progress to Lake Simcoe and Lake Huron; one iron horse already affords it communication with Waterloo—nearly opposite Buffalo—whence produce descends by the Erie Canal and the Hudson to New York: besides all which advantages, it enjoys at present the privilege of being one of the seats of government and the radiating point of education. Surely, then, if any town in Upper Canada ought to flourish, it is Toronto; nor is there, I trust, any reason to doubt that it will become a most wealthy and important place. The influence of the young railways is already beginning to be felt: the population, which in 1851 was only 25,000, amounted in 1853 to upwards of 30,000, and is still rapidly increasing. Having been fortunate enough to make the acquaintance of Mr. Cumberland, the chief engineer of the line of railway to Lake Simcoe, he was kind enough to ask me to accompany him to that lake on a trip of inspection, an offer of which I gladly availed myself. I was delighted to find that the Canadians had sufficient good sense to patronize first and second class carriages; and, also, that they have begun to make their own carriages and locomotives. The rails appeared very solidly laid down, and the road fenced off; but, despite the fences, an inquisitive cow managed to get on the line, and was very near being made beef of in consequence. The progress of cultivation gave the most satisfactory evidence of increasing prosperity, while the virgin forest-land told what a rich harvest was still in store for the industrious emigrant.

Toronto is beautifully located and looks thriving and successful; the way property values are skyrocketing here is amazing, and some people's profits are quite impressive. A property that was bought for £30,000 was resold in lots for £100,000 within a month—before the full payment was even made. The city's location is perfectly suited for a major commercial hub: it has a secure harbor; it's on a lake about 190 miles long and 50 miles wide; from there, the St. Lawrence River transports its goods to the ocean, and the Rideau Canal links it to the lumber camps along the Ottawa; the main railway line, which will stretch from the western edge of the province to Halifax, runs through it; a local line, crossing some of the richest land in Canada, is currently being developed to Lake Simcoe and Lake Huron; one train already connects it to Waterloo—directly across from Buffalo—where goods are transported by the Erie Canal and the Hudson River to New York. On top of all these advantages, it currently enjoys the status of being one of the government seats and a central point for education. Clearly, if any town in Upper Canada is poised to thrive, it's Toronto; and I believe there is every reason to expect it will become a very wealthy and significant city. The impact of the new railways is already becoming noticeable: the population, which was only 25,000 in 1851, grew to over 30,000 by 1853 and is still rapidly increasing. I was lucky enough to meet Mr. Cumberland, the chief engineer for the railway to Lake Simcoe, and he generously invited me to join him for an inspection trip to the lake, which I eagerly accepted. I was thrilled to see that Canadians have the good sense to use first and second class carriages; and that they've started making their own carriages and locomotives. The tracks seemed to be laid down very solidly, and the road was fenced off; however, despite the fences, a curious cow managed to wander onto the tracks and came dangerously close to becoming dinner. The advancement in agriculture provided clear evidence of growing prosperity, while the untouched forest land showed the rich opportunities still available for hardworking newcomers.

Ever and anon you saw on the cleared ground that feature so peculiar to American scenery, a patriarchal remnant of the once dense forest, as destitute of branches as the early Adam was of small-clothes, his bark sabled by the flames, the few summit leaves—which alone indicated vitality—scarce more in number than the centuries he could boast, and trembling, as it were, at their perilous weight and doubtful tenure, while around him stood stumps more sabled, on whom the flames had done more deadly work, the whole—when the poetry had passed away—reminding one of a black Paterfamilias standing proudly in the centre of his nigger brood.

Now and then, you would see on the cleared land that characteristic feature of American landscapes, a patriarchal remnant of the once-thick forest, stripped of branches just like early Adam was stripped of clothing, its bark charred by flames. The few leaves at the top, which were the only signs of life, were hardly more numerous than the centuries it had witnessed, trembling as if under the weight and uncertainty of their survival. Surrounding it were stumps, even more burned, victims of the flames that had done a more destructive job. The whole scene—once you stripped away the poetry—was reminiscent of a proud black patriarch standing in the midst of his children.

There is a good iron-foundry established here, which turns out some excellent engines. Some of the public buildings are also fine; but, there being unfortunately no quarries in the neighbourhood, they are built of brick. The Lunatic Asylum is one of the best; but it is surrounded with a high prison-looking wall, which I believe modern experience condemns strongly as exercising a baneful influence upon the unfortunate patients. If it be so, let us hope it may be enclosed by something more light, airy, and open.

There’s a well-established iron foundry here that produces some excellent engines. Some of the public buildings are also impressive, but unfortunately, there are no quarries nearby, so they’re made of brick. The Lunatic Asylum is one of the best, but it’s surrounded by a tall, prison-like wall, which I believe modern perspectives strongly criticize for having a negative impact on the unfortunate patients. If that’s the case, let’s hope it can be replaced with something lighter, airier, and more open.

Several of the churches are very fine. I visited the Episcopal Church, which has been burnt down three times; and on my remarking to the architect the apparent clumsiness of the pews, which destroyed the effect inside, he smiled, and told me that by the contract he was obliged to replace them exactly as before. I told him I thought it was a specimen of conservatism run mad, to which he fully assented. Trinity Episcopal College is one of the finest edifices in the neighbourhood; at present it contains only thirty-five students, but it is to be hoped its sphere of usefulness may be extended as its funds increase. It has the foundation of a very good library, which is rapidly extending; the University of Cambridge sent them out a magnificent addition of 3000 volumes. The last building I shall mention is the Normal School, to visit which was one of my chief objects in stopping at Toronto.

Several of the churches are quite impressive. I visited the Episcopal Church, which has burned down three times; when I mentioned to the architect how awkward the pews looked, ruining the interior vibe, he smiled and explained that he was required by the contract to replace them exactly as they were before. I told him I thought it was an example of extreme conservatism, and he completely agreed. Trinity Episcopal College is one of the most beautiful buildings in the area; right now, it only has thirty-five students, but hopefully, its usefulness will grow as its funds increase. It has a solid library that is expanding rapidly; the University of Cambridge sent them a fantastic addition of 3,000 volumes. The last building I’ll mention is the Normal School, which was one of my main reasons for stopping in Toronto.

THE NORMAL SCHOOL, TORONTO

THE NORMAL SCHOOL, TORONTO

THE NORMAL SCHOOL, TORONTO

The Normal School, Toronto

The ceremony of laying the foundation-stone of this building was inaugurated with all due solemnity, and under the auspices of the able representative of our gracious Queen, on the 2nd of July, 1851. In his eloquent speech on that memorable occasion, when referring to the difficulties on the question of religious instruction, the following beautiful passage occurs:—

The ceremony for laying the foundation stone of this building took place with all the necessary solemnity, and under the guidance of our gracious Queen's skilled representative, on July 2, 1851. In his moving speech during that memorable event, when addressing the challenges surrounding religious instruction, the following beautiful passage was mentioned:—

"I get it, sir, that while the different views and opinions of a __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__,

In a diverse religious society, beliefs are carefully respected, while every

The appearance of dictation is carefully avoided; it is desired, it is

it is strongly recommended, and it is confidently anticipated and desired, that

Every child who goes to our public schools will learn there that he

is a being who is interested in both eternity and time; that he

has a Father to whom he is closer and more connected, and

a more affectionate relationship than with any earthly father, and that

Father is in heaven; he has a hope that goes far beyond anything earthly.

hope—a hope filled with immortality—the hope, specifically, that that Father's

the kingdom may come; that he has a duty which, like the sun in our

The celestial system is at the heart of his moral responsibilities,

casting a sacred light on them that they, in turn, reflect

and absorb—the responsibility of trying to demonstrate through his life and

Please talk about the sincerity of his prayer that the Father's will may

be done on earth as it is in heaven. I understand, sir, that on

the wide and serious platform that is built upon that good

We invite all ministers of religion to join us in this foundation.

denominations—the de facto spiritual leaders of the people of the

country—to stand with us; that, rather than

hindering or obstructing them in carrying out their important duties,

we ask, and we plead with them to take the children—the lambs of the flock

which are dedicated to their care—set aside, and guide them to those

pastures and streams where they believe they will find the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

food of life and the waters of comfort.



"Allow me to conclude by saying, both as a humble Christian and"

As the leader of the provincial civil government, I am pleased to...

It’s a genuine pleasure to see that the young people in this country, of all

denominations, who are expected in their later years to meet in the

fulfilling the responsibilities of civilian life under conditions of complete civility and

Religious equality—I say it gives me joy to hear and to understand.

that they are getting an education that is tailored so well to

qualify them for carrying out these important duties, and that

while their hearts are still tender and their feelings are still fresh and

young, they are grouped together under conditions that are likely to

encourage the development of genuine Christian virtues among them—mutual

respect, patience, and kindness.

The position of the building is well chosen, being surrounded with cultivated ground sufficiently extensive to be usefully employed in illustrating the lectures given on vegetable physiology and agricultural chemistry. The rooms are all very lofty, airy, and scrupulously clean. A notice at the entrance warns you—"The dirty practice of spitting not allowed in this building;" and as far as eye could discern, the notice is rigidly obeyed. I was told that a specific had been found to cure the filthy habit. I mention it for the benefit of hotel-keepers and railway-conductors, in all places where such a relic of barbarism may still find a welcome. On a certain occasion, the lecturer having received undeniable proof that one of the students had violated the above-mentioned regulation, stopped in the middle of one of his sublimest flights, repeated sonorously the notice, called the culprit by name, informed him that his endeavour to dissipate his filth into infinity by the sole of his shoe was useless, and ordered him forthwith to take his handkerchief out and wipe it up clean. Disobedience was expulsion: with crimson cheek he expiated his offence by obedience to the order, and doubtless during the hushed silence in which he completed his labour, he became a confirmed anti-expectorationist.

The location of the building is well chosen, surrounded by enough cultivated land to effectively demonstrate the lectures on plant physiology and agricultural chemistry. The rooms are all very tall, airy, and impeccably clean. A notice at the entrance warns, “Spitting is not allowed in this building,” and as far as the eye can see, this rule is strictly followed. I was informed that a remedy had been discovered to cure this unpleasant habit. I mention it for the benefit of hotel owners and train conductors in any place where such a remnant of barbarism may still be tolerated. On one occasion, the lecturer, having received undeniable proof that one of the students had broken this rule, stopped mid-lecture, loudly repeated the notice, called the offender by name, told him that his attempt to wipe his mess away with his shoe was pointless, and ordered him to take out his handkerchief and clean it up. Disobedience meant expulsion: with a red face, he made amends by following the order, and undoubtedly, during the silent moment in which he completed his task, he became a firm anti-spitting advocate.

Great attention is very properly paid to cleanliness, inasmuch as if these young men, who are destined to teach others, acquire filthy habits, they naturally encourage the same vice in their pupils, and thus may be almost said to nationalize it. All the tables and stools are fitted like those in the schools of the United States, which is an immense improvement on the one long-desk and long form to match, which predominate all but universally at home. The instruction given is essentially by lecture and questioning; and I was particularly struck with the quiet modulated tones in which the answers were given, and which clearly proved how much pains were taken upon this apparently trifling, but really very important, point.[AR] You heard no harsh declamation grating on your ear; and, on the other hand, you were not lulled to sleep by dreary, dull monotony.

Great attention is rightly given to cleanliness, as if these young men, who are meant to teach others, develop dirty habits, they naturally promote the same vice in their students, and can almost be said to make it a norm. All the tables and stools are arranged like those in schools in the United States, which is a huge improvement over the long desks and benches that are almost universally found at home. The instruction is mainly through lectures and questioning; and I was particularly impressed by the calm, measured tones in which the answers were given, which clearly showed how much effort was put into this seemingly minor, but truly important, aspect. You heard no harsh shouting that hurt your ears; and, on the flip side, you weren’t put to sleep by boring, monotonous speech.

There are two small schools attached to the establishment, for these Normal aspirants, male and female, to practise upon, when considered sufficiently qualified. Those thus employed during my visit seemed to succeed admirably, for I never saw more merry, cheerful faces, which I consider one of the best tests of a master's efficiency. The little girls, taking a fancy for music, purchased among themselves a cottage piano, which, being their own instrument, I have no doubt increased their interest in the study amazingly. The boys have a kind of gymnasium under a shed, which, when released from school, they rush to with an avidity only equalled by that which the reader may have experienced in his early days when catching sight of a pastry-cook's shop immediately after receiving his first tip.[AS]

There are two small schools associated with the establishment for aspiring teachers, both male and female, to practice when they're deemed qualified. The ones working there during my visit seemed to do really well, as I never saw so many happy, cheerful faces, which I believe is one of the best signs of a teacher's effectiveness. The little girls, who had a passion for music, pooled their money to buy a cottage piano, which I’m sure boosted their interest in studying music significantly. The boys have a sort of gym under a shed, and when school lets out, they rush to it with an enthusiasm only matched by what you might have felt in your younger days at the sight of a bakery after getting your first allowance.[AS]

I believe that to this establishment, which was founded in 1846, belongs the honour of being the Pioneer Normal School in the Western Hemisphere. But while giving due credit to the Governor-General and the Government for their leading parts in its foundation, it should never be forgotten, how much indebted the establishment is to the unwearying zeal and patient investigations of Dr. Ryerson, the chief superintendent of schools in Canada. This gentleman carefully examined the various systems and internal arrangement of scholastic establishments, not only all over the States, but in every country of the Old World, selecting from each those features which seemed to produce the most comfort, the best instruction, and the greatest harmony. The result of his inquiries I subjoin from his own pen:—

I believe that this institution, established in 1846, deserves the honor of being the Pioneer Normal School in the Western Hemisphere. While we should give credit to the Governor-General and the Government for their significant roles in its founding, we must also remember how much this institution owes to the tireless dedication and careful research of Dr. Ryerson, the chief superintendent of schools in Canada. He thoroughly investigated various educational systems and setups, not only across the States but also in every country in the Old World, selecting from each those elements that seemed to provide the most comfort, the best education, and the greatest harmony. I'll share the results of his research in his own words:—

"Our public elementary education system is eclectic and is, to a

to a significant degree, came from four sources. The conclusions at

which the current head of the department joined during his

Observations and investigations from 1845 were, first of all, that the

the machinery or legal aspect of the system in the State of New York was

the best overall, appearing, however, flawed in the

complexity of certain details, without an effective

provision for visiting and inspecting schools, the

review of teachers, religious education, and standardized textbooks

for the schools. Secondly, that the principle of supporting schools in

The state of Massachusetts was the best, providing support to all of them accordingly.

to property, and making them accessible to everyone without exception; but that the

The application of this principle should not depend on the requirements.

of state or provincial law, but at the discretion and by the

the yearly actions of the residents in each school

municipality—thereby preventing the objection that could be raised against

a uniform coercive law on this issue, and the potential indifference

which could in some cases be caused by the terms of such a

law—independent of local choices and actions. Thirdly: That the series

of basic textbooks, created by experienced teachers, and

revised and published with the approval of the National Board of

Education in Ireland was generally the most suitable for schools in __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

Upper Canada—after being tested for a long time, having been translated into __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__,

multiple languages of Europe, and having been

introduced more widely than any other series of textbooks into

the schools in England and Scotland. Fourthly: That the system of

teacher training at normal schools, along with the principles and methods of

teaching that was found to exist in Germany, and that has been

largely introduced in other countries, were unmatched the

best—the system that makes school teaching a profession, which, at

Every stage and every field of knowledge teaches things and not

just words that explain and showcase the principles of rules,

instead of assuming and relying on their verbal authority, which

develops all mental abilities instead of just focusing on cultivating and

loading the memory—a system that is reliable rather than flashy,

practical instead of showy, which encourages independence

thinking and action instead of just following blindly.

"These are the sources from which the main characteristics of the school"

The system in Upper Canada has been developed through the application of

each of them has been influenced by the local circumstances of our

country. There's another aspect, or rather a fundamental principle of it,

which is more native than exotic, which lacks the

educational systems in some countries, which serves as the occasion

and a tool for unfair distinctions and unreasonable prohibitions

In other countries, we're talking about the principle of not just making __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

Christianity is the foundation of the system and the core element of everything.

its parts, but rather recognizing and combining in their official

character, all the clergy in the country, along with their congregations, in its

practical operations—maintaining complete parental control in the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

the religious education of their children, and based on this principle

providing for it based on the circumstances, and under the

under the guidance of the elected trustee-representatives of each school

municipality. The clergy in the country have access to each of its

schools; and we are not aware of any case where the school has been made

the site of religious conflict; however, many cases, particularly on

during quarterly public examinations, in which the school has

observed the gathering and friendly interaction of clergy from different

religious beliefs, and therefore become the focal point of a

the spirit of Christian kindness and strong collaboration in the primary

"the work of a community's civilization and happiness."

With reference to religious instruction at the normal schools, Dr. Ryerson has kindly furnished me with the following statement:—"A part of each Friday afternoon is set apart for this purpose, and a room allowed for the minister of each of the religious persuasions of the students, to give instruction to the members of his church, who are required to attend, as also to attend the service of such church at least once every Sunday. Hitherto we have found no difficulty, reluctance, or neglect, in giving full effect to this system."

With regard to religious education at the normal schools, Dr. Ryerson has kindly provided me with the following statement:—"Every Friday afternoon, part of the time is dedicated to this purpose, and a room is made available for the minister of each religious group represented by the students to provide instruction to their members, who are expected to attend, as well as to participate in the service of their church at least once every Sunday. So far, we have encountered no issues, reluctance, or neglect in fully implementing this system."

The only difficulty in these matters that I have heard of, is a long dispute with the Roman Catholic bishop of Toronto; but such an event one must be prepared for when dealing with a church which claims infallibility. I have no doubt the tact and moderation of Dr. Ryerson have ere this thrown oil on the troubled waters, and restored the harmony which existed between the former Roman bishop and the reverend doctor. To those who take an interest in education, the report of the system used in Canada, drawn up by Dr. Ryerson, and printed by order of the Legislative Assembly, will afford much pleasure and information. It is, of course, far too large a subject to enter upon in these pages, containing, as it does, so vast an amount of matter worthy of serious reflection. I will, however, indulge such of my friends as were taught to read in the last century, with a quotation from page 67, which will probably astonish them.

The only issue I've heard about in these matters is a long dispute with the Roman Catholic bishop of Toronto; but you have to expect that when dealing with a church that claims to be infallible. I have no doubt that Dr. Ryerson’s tact and moderation have already calmed things down and restored the harmony that used to exist between the former Roman bishop and the reverend doctor. For those interested in education, the report on the system used in Canada, created by Dr. Ryerson and published by order of the Legislative Assembly, will provide a lot of enjoyment and information. It’s obviously too large a topic to cover fully here, as it includes so much worthy of serious thought. However, I will indulge my friends who learned to read in the last century with a quote from page 67, which will probably surprise them.

Mr. Horace Mann, so long the able Secretary of the Board of Education in Massachusetts, after pointing out the absurdity of worrying a child's life out, in teaching the A B C, &c., and their doubtful and often-varying sounds utterly destitute of meaning, instead of words which have distinct sounds and distinct meaning, thus winds up:—"Learning his letters, therefore, gives him no new sound; it even restricts his attention to a small number of those he already knows. So far, then, the learning of his letters contracts his practice; and were it not for keeping up his former habits of speaking, at home and in the playground, the teacher, during the six months or year in which he confines him to the twenty-six sounds of the alphabet, would pretty near deprive him of the faculty of speech."

Mr. Horace Mann, who was the effective Secretary of the Board of Education in Massachusetts, after highlighting the absurdity of exhausting a child's life by teaching the alphabet and its uncertain and often-changing sounds that lack meaning, instead of using words with clear sounds and meanings, concludes: “Learning his letters, therefore, doesn’t give him any new sound; it actually limits his attention to just a few of those he already knows. So in this way, learning the letters restricts his practice; and if it weren’t for maintaining his usual ways of speaking at home and on the playground, the teacher, during the six months or year in which he limits him to the twenty-six sounds of the alphabet, would almost completely take away his ability to speak.”

This extract, from the pen of one who has devoted so much talent and patient investigation to the subject of education, entitles it to the serious consideration of all those who are in any way connected with the same subject in this country, where the old A B C cramming all but universally prevails.—But to return to Upper Canada and its schools. Some estimate of the value of its scholastic establishments may be formed from the fact, that while its sphere of usefulness is rapidly extending, it has already reached the following honourable position: The population of Upper Canada is close upon 1,000,000; the number of children between the ages of 5 and 16 is 263,000; the number of children on the rolls of the common school establishments is 179,587; and the grand total of money available for these glorious purposes, is 170,000l. I feel conscious that I have by no means done full justice to this important subject; but the limits of a work like this render it impossible so to do. Let it suffice to say, that Upper Canada is inferior to none of its neighbouring rivals, as regards the quality of instruction given; and that it is rapidly treading on the heels of the most liberal of them, as regards the amount raised for its support. The normal school, I conceive to be a model as nearly perfect as human agency has yet achieved; and the chemical and agricultural lectures there given, and practically illustrated on the small farm adjoining the building, cannot fail to produce most useful and important results in a young uncultivated country possessing the richest soil imaginable. The Governor-General and the Government deserve every credit for the support and encouragement they have given to education; but, if I may draw a comparison without being invidious, I would repeat, that it is to the unusual zeal and energy of Dr. Ryerson, to his great powers of discriminating and selecting what he found most valuable in the countless methods he examined, and to his combination and adaptation of them, that the colony is mainly indebted for its present admirable system. Well may Upper Canada be proud of her educational achievements, and in her past exertions read a hopeful earnest of a yet more noble future.[AT]

This excerpt, written by someone who has dedicated significant talent and careful research to the topic of education, deserves serious attention from anyone involved with the issue in this country, where the old style of rote learning still mostly dominates. —Returning to Upper Canada and its schools, we can gauge the value of its educational institutions from the fact that, while their impact is rapidly growing, they have already achieved this impressive status: The population of Upper Canada is nearly 1,000,000; there are 263,000 children aged 5 to 16; 179,587 children are enrolled in the public school system; and the total funding available for these important purposes is £170,000. I know I haven't done full justice to this significant topic, but the limitations of this work make it impossible to do so. It’s enough to say that Upper Canada is not inferior to any of its neighboring competitors in the quality of education provided and is quickly catching up to the most forward-thinking in terms of funding. I view the normal school as a nearly perfect model that humanity has so far achieved; the chemical and agricultural lectures given there, along with practical demonstrations on the small farm next to the building, are bound to yield valuable results in a young, untamed region with the best possible soil. The Governor-General and the Government deserve full credit for the support and encouragement they have provided to education. However, without wanting to be unfair, I must emphasize that much of the credit for the colony's excellent educational system goes to the extraordinary commitment and energy of Dr. Ryerson, his exceptional ability to discern and select the most valuable approaches from the numerous methods he reviewed, and his integration and adaptation of them. Upper Canada can certainly take pride in its educational achievements and see in its past efforts a promising sign of an even more remarkable future.[AT]

But it is not in education alone that Canada has been shadowing forth a noble career. Emancipated from maternal apron-strings by a constitutional self-government, and aided by the superior administrative powers of the Earl of Elgin, she has exhibited an innate vitality which had so long been smothered by Imperial misrule as to cause a doubt of its existence; and if she has not shown it by the birth of populous cities, she has proved it by a more general and diffusive prosperity. A revenue quadrupled in four years needs no Chicagos or Buffalos to endorse the colony's claims to energy and progress. Internal improvements have also been undertaken on a large scale: railways are threading their iron bands through waste and forest, and connecting in one link all the North American colonies; the tubular bridge at Montreal will be the most stupendous work yet undertaken by engineering skill; canals are making a safe way for commerce, where a year or two back the roaring rapid threw its angry barrier. Population, especially in Upper Canada, is marching forward with hasty strides; the value of property is fast increasing; loyalty has supplanted discontent and rebellion; an imperial baby has become a princely colony, with as national an existence as any kingdom of the Old World.[AU] These are facts upon which the colonists may, and do, look with feelings of both pride and satisfaction; and none can more justly contemplate them with such emotions, than those through whose administrative talents these prosperous results have been produced, out of a state of chaos, in eight short years. Dissatisfied men there ever will be among a large community, and therefore questions of independence and annexation will be mooted from time to time; but it seems hardly probable that a colony which enjoys an almost independent nationality would ever be disposed to resign that proud position, and to swamp her individuality among the thirty-three free and slave States of the adjoining Republic. At all events, the colony, by her conduct with reference to the present war, has shown that she is filled with a spirit of loyalty, devotion, and sympathy as true, as fervent, and as deep as those which animate all the other subjects of our beloved Sovereign.

But Canada’s journey has been remarkable not just in education. Freed from the guidance of the British government through self-governance, and supported by the strong leadership of the Earl of Elgin, Canada has demonstrated a natural vitality that Imperial mismanagement had long stifled, causing many to doubt it even existed. Even if it hasn’t produced major cities, it has shown a broad and widespread prosperity. A revenue that has quadrupled in four years doesn’t need cities like Chicago or Buffalo to affirm the colony's energy and growth. Major infrastructure projects are underway: railways are cutting through wilderness and forests, creating connections between all the North American colonies; the tubular bridge in Montreal will be the most impressive engineering feat yet; canals are being built to facilitate trade where just a year or two ago, ferocious rapids created obstacles. The population, especially in Upper Canada, is rapidly increasing; property values are climbing quickly; loyalty has replaced dissent and rebellion; Canada has transformed from a young colony into a mature one with a national identity as strong as any kingdom in the Old World.[AU] These are facts that the colonists can proudly acknowledge, and no one is more justified in feeling this pride than those whose administrative skills have developed these successful outcomes from a state of chaos in just eight short years. There will always be dissatisfied individuals in any large community, and discussions about independence and annexation will arise from time to time; however, it seems unlikely that a colony enjoying such a nearly independent status would willingly give up that pride and merge into the thirty-three free and slave states of the neighboring Republic. Regardless, through its conduct regarding the current war, the colony has demonstrated a spirit of loyalty, devotion, and empathy that is as genuine, passionate, and profound as that which inspires all the other subjects of our cherished Sovereign.

Farewell, Canada! May the sun of prosperity, which has been rising upon you steadily for eight years, rise higher and higher, and never know either a cloud or a meridian! Canada, adieu!

Farewell, Canada! May the sun of prosperity, which has been shining on you steadily for eight years, rise higher and higher, and may you never experience a cloud or a limit! Canada, goodbye!


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

My observations at various schools in the United States satisfied me that no attention is paid by the teachers to the tone of voice in which the boys give their answers.


The females are regularly taught calisthenics, and the boys gymnastics, by a professor.


These remarks were made in 1853. The report for the year 1854 is now lying before me, by which I find that the attendance has increased to 194,376; and the money raised has also increased in a similar ratio, being at that date 199,674l.



Population of Canada         1841,   1,156,139 } Increase,  
  Same         same          1851,   1,842,265 } 59.34 percent.  

Population of Upper Canada   1841,     405,357 } Increase,  
  Same         same        1851,     952,004 } 104.57 percent  

The increase of the United States from 1840 to 1850 was only 37.77 percent.  

Wheat crop, Upper Canada     1841,   3,221,991 bushels.  
   Same         same         1851,  12,692,852  same,  
Wheat crop, Lower Canada     1841,   1,021,405 bushels.  
   Same         same         1851,   3,326,190  same.
This table is taken from an able statement sent by the Governor-General to the Colonial Office, dated Quebec, Dec. 22, 1852.



CHAPTER XXI.

A Cataract and a Celebration.




The convulsive efforts of the truant steam, echoing across the harbour, told me I had little time to lose: so, bidding farewell to friends, I hurried down to the quay, and was soon bowling over a lake as smooth and polished as the bald head of age. The pat of every float in the wheel, as it struck in the water, echoed with individual distinctness, and the hubbub created thereby, in the otherwise unruffled lake, left its trace visible on the mirrory surface for so great a distance as to justify a disputatious man in questioning whether the term "trackless way" was applicable to the course a vessel had passed over. Here we are, steaming away merrily for Niagara.

The choppy sounds of the departing steam echoed across the harbor, signaling that I had little time left: so, after saying goodbye to my friends, I rushed down to the dock and was soon speeding across a lake as smooth and shiny as a balding head. Each float in the wheel made a distinct splash as it hit the water, and the noise it created on the otherwise calm lake left visible ripples on the mirrored surface for such a distance that it might make someone debate whether the phrase "trackless way" really applied to the path a boat had taken. Here we go, happily steaming towards Niagara.

There is nothing interesting in scenery until you come to the entrance of the river, on the opposite sides of which stand Lewistown and Queenstown, and above the latter the ruthlessly mutilated remains of the monument to the gallant Brock. The miscreant who perpetrated the vile act in 1841, has since fallen into the clutches of the law, and has done—and, for aught I know, is now doing—penance in the New York State Prison at Auburn. I believe the Government are at last repairing it;—better late than never. The precipitous banks on either side clearly indicate they are the silent and persevering work of the ever-rolling stream, and leave no doubt upon any reflecting mind that they must lead to some fall or cataract, though no reflection can fully realize the giant cataract of Niagara.

There's nothing remarkable about the scenery until you reach the river's entrance, where Lewistown and Queenstown sit on opposite banks, and above Queenstown stand the brutally damaged remains of the monument to the brave Brock. The person responsible for that despicable act in 1841 has since faced the law and is doing—so far as I know—penance in the New York State Prison at Auburn. I think the government is finally fixing it; better late than never. The steep banks on either side clearly show they are the result of the constantly flowing river, leaving no doubt in any thoughtful person's mind that they must lead to some falls or waterfall, although no thought can completely capture the greatness of Niagara Falls.

There are several country places on the banks, and the whole appearance bespeaks comfort and civilization. Far away in the distance is to be seen the suspension-bridge, high in mid-air, and straight as the arrow's flight. On either bank rival railroads are in progress; that on the Canada side is protected from the yawning abyss by a wall calculated to defy the power of steam. The boat touches at Queenstown, and thence proceeds to Lewistown, where a stage is waiting for Niagara City. No botherations of custom-house—what a blessing! The distance to ride is seven miles, and the time one hour; but in the United States, you are aware, every chap will "do as he best pleases;" consequently, there is a little information to be obtained from the fresh arrival, a cock-tail with a friend or two, a quiet piling on of luggage, &c.; all this takes a long half-hour, and away we go with four tough little nags. A tremendous long hill warms their hides and cools their mettle, though by no means expending it. On we go, merrily; Jehu, a free-and-easy, well-informed companion, guessing at certainties and calculating on facts.

There are several country spots along the banks, and everything looks comfortable and civilized. In the distance, you can see the suspension bridge, high in the air and as straight as an arrow's flight. On each bank, competing railroads are being built; the one on the Canadian side is protected from the steep drop by a wall designed to withstand steam power. The boat stops at Queenstown, then continues to Lewistown, where a stagecoach is waiting for Niagara City. No hassles with customs—what a relief! The ride is seven miles and takes about an hour; but in the U.S., as you know, everyone will "do as they please," so you get a bit of information from the new arrival, share a cocktail with a friend or two, quietly load up the luggage, etc.; all this takes a slow half-hour, and off we go with four sturdy little horses. A long, steep hill warms them up and cools their energy, though it doesn’t exhaust them. On we go, happily; Jehu, a laid-back and knowledgeable companion, makes educated guesses and calculates facts.

At last we reach a spring by the roadside, the steam rising from the flanks of the team like mist from a marsh. What do I see? Number one nag with a pailful of water, swigging away like a Glasgow baillie at a bowl of punch. He drains it dry with a rapidity which says "More, more!" and sure enough they keep on giving pail after pail, till he has taken in enough to burst the tough hide of a rhinoceros. I naturally concluded the horse was an invalid, or a culprit who had got drunk, and that they were mixing the liquor "black list" fashion, to save his intestines and to improve his manners; but no—round goes the pailman to every nag, drenching each to the bursting point.

At last, we come to a spring by the side of the road, steam rising from the horses like fog from a marsh. What do I see? The top horse with a bucket of water, gulping it down like a Glasgow official at a bowl of punch. He finishes it quickly, signaling "More, more!" and sure enough, they keep providing bucket after bucket until he’s had enough to burst the tough skin of a rhinoceros. I naturally thought the horse was sick or a troublemaker who had gotten drunk, and that they were mixing the drink in a way to protect his insides and improve his behavior; but no—around goes the bucket man to each horse, soaking every one to the limit.

"Ain't you afraid," I said, "of killing the poor beasts by giving them such a lot of water?"

"Aren't you worried," I said, "about harming the poor animals by giving them so much water?"

"I guess if I was, I shouldn't give it 'em," was the terse reply.

"I suppose if I were, I shouldn't give it to them," was the brief response.

Upon making further inquiries into this mysterious treatment, he told me that it was a sulphur spring, and that all tired horses having exhibited an avidity for it far greater than for common water, the instinct of the animal had been given a fair trial, and subsequent experience had so ratified that instinct that it had become a "known fact." An intelligent American, sitting at the feet of a quadruped Gamaliel, humbly learning from his instincts, should teach the bigots of every class and clime to let their prejudices hang more loosely upon them. But half an hour has passed, and Jehu is again on the box, the nags as fresh as daisies, and as full as a corncob. Half an hour more lands us at Niagara. Avoiding the hum of men, I took refuge for the night in a snug little cottage handy to the railway, and, having deposited my traps, started on a moonlight trip. I need scarce say whither.

Upon asking more about this mysterious treatment, he told me it was a sulfur spring, and that all tired horses showed a much stronger preference for it than for regular water. The animal's instinct had been tested and proven, making it a "known fact." An insightful American, learning from the instincts of a four-legged teacher, should show the bigots of all kinds to loosen their prejudices a bit. But half an hour has passed, and Jehu is back on the box, the horses as fresh as daisies and as full as a corn cob. Another half hour brings us to Niagara. Avoiding the crowd, I found a cozy little cottage close to the railway to spend the night, and after dropping off my things, I set out on a moonlit walk. I hardly need to say where I was headed.

Men of the highest and loftiest minds, men of the humblest and simplest minds, the poet and the philosopher, the shepherd and the Christian, have alike borne testimony to the fact, that the solitude of night tends to solemnize and elevate the thoughts. How greatly must this effect be increased when aided by the contemplation of so grand a work of nature as Niagara! In the broad blaze of a noonday sun, the power of such contemplation is weakened by the forced admixture of the earthly element, interspersed as the scene is with the habitations and works of man. But, in the hushed repose of night, man stands, as it were, more alone with his Maker. The mere admirer of the picturesque or the grand will find much to interest and charm him; but may there not arise in the Christian's mind far deeper and higher thoughts to feed his contemplation? In the cataract's mighty roar may he not hear a voice proclaiming the anger of an unreconciled God? May not the soft beams of the silvery moon above awaken thoughts of the mercies of a pardoning God? And as he views those beams, veiled, as it wore, in tears by the rising spray, may he not think of Him and his tears, through whom alone those mercies flow to man? May not yon mist rising heavenward recal his glorious hopes through an ascended Saviour; and as it falls again perpetually and imperceptibly, may it not typify the dew of the Holy Spirit—ever invisible, ever descending—the blessed fruit of that Holy Ascension? And if the mind be thus insensibly led into such a train of thought, may not the deep and rugged cliff, worn away by centuries unnumbered by man, shadow forth to him ideas of that past Eternity, compared to which they are but as a span; and may not the rolling stream, sweeping onward in rapid and unceasing flight into the abyss beneath his feet, fill his soul with the contemplation of Time's flight, which, alike rapid and continuous, is ever bearing him nearer and nearer to the brink of that future Eternity in which all his highest and brightest hopes will be more than realized in the enjoyment of a happiness such as "eye hath not seen nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man to conceive." Say, then, reader, is not every element of thought which can arise between a Christian and his Creator symbolled forth here in equal beauty and grandeur? One, indeed, is wanting, which, alas! none of Nature's works but man can supply—that sad element, which those who search their own hearts the deepest will feel the most.—I feel I have departed from the legitimate subject of travels; let the majesty of the scene plead my excuse.

Men with the most brilliant and ambitious minds, along with those with the simplest and humblest thoughts—the poet and the philosopher, the shepherd and the Christian—have all attested to the fact that the solitude of night can elevate and deepen one's thoughts. How much more profound must this effect be when combined with the contemplation of such an awe-inspiring natural wonder as Niagara Falls! In the bright light of midday, the power of this reflection is diminished by the presence of human elements, as the scene is dotted with homes and man-made structures. But in the quiet stillness of night, a person feels more alone with their Creator. Those who simply admire the beauty of nature will find much to captivate and enchant them; however, could the Christian not experience even deeper and more profound thoughts during such moments? In the overwhelming roar of the waterfalls, might one hear a voice expressing the frustration of a God who remains unappeased? Could the gentle light of the silvery moon above inspire thoughts of the compassion of a forgiving God? And as they gaze at those beams, obscured by the mist rising like tears, might they not think of the one whose tears bring those mercies to humanity? Could the mist rising toward the heavens remind them of their glorious hopes through a risen Savior; and as it falls again, endlessly and imperceptibly, might it symbolize the dew of the Holy Spirit—ever unseen, ever descending—the blessed outcome of that Holy Ascension? And if the mind is subtly led into such reflections, could the deep and rugged cliff, worn away over countless centuries, not evoke ideas of an eternal past, compared to which these cliffs are insignificant? Might not the flowing stream, rushing onward into the abyss beneath them, fill their soul with thoughts of the passage of time, which, like the stream, is continuous and swift, ever bringing them closer to the edge of a future eternity, where all their greatest and brightest dreams will be more than fulfilled in a happiness that "eye has not seen nor ear heard, nor has it entered into the heart of man to conceive"? So, dear reader, is not every aspect of thought that can emerge between a Christian and their Creator beautifully and grandly represented here? One aspect is indeed missing, which, unfortunately, only humanity can provide—that somber element that those who deeply examine their own hearts will feel most acutely. I realize I've strayed from the intended topic of travel; let the majesty of the scene justify my digression.

Adieu, Niagara.

Goodbye, Niagara.

Early next morning I put myself into a railway car, and in due time reached Batavia. On my arrival, being rather hungry, I made a modest request for a little brandy and some biscuits; fancy my astonishment when the "help" said, "I guess we only give meals at the fixed hours." As I disapproved very much of such an unreasonable and ridiculous refusal, I sought out the chief, and, preferring my modest request to him, was readily supplied with my simple luncheon. In the meantime a light fly had been prepared, and off I started for Geneseo. The road presented the usual features of rich cultivated land, a dash of wild forest, a bit of bog, and ruts like drains; and each hamlet or village exhibited a permanent or an ambulating daguerreotype shop. Four hours housed me with my kind and hospitable friends at Geneseo.

Early the next morning, I got on a train and eventually arrived in Batavia. When I got there, I was pretty hungry, so I made a simple request for some brandy and biscuits; imagine my surprise when the staff replied, “I think we only serve meals at set times.” Displeased with such an unreasonable and ridiculous response, I went to the manager and, after making my modest request to him, was quickly given my light lunch. In the meantime, a light carriage had been prepared, and I set off for Geneseo. The road showed the usual features of rich farmland, a touch of wild forest, a bit of wetland, and ruts like drainage ditches; and each town or village had either a permanent or a traveling daguerreotype studio. I spent four hours with my kind and welcoming friends in Geneseo.

As the chances of travel had brought me to a small country village at the time of the annual celebration of the 4th of July, I was unable to witness the ceremony on the grand scale in which it is conducted in the large cities of the Union; and, as I think it is frequently accompanied with circumstances which are entitled to some consideration, I shall revert, in a subsequent chapter, to those points which appear to me calculated to act upon the national character. On the present occasion I was delighted to find that, although people all "liquored" freely, there was scarcely any drunkenness; at all events, they had their little bit of fun, such as we see at fairs at home. By way of enabling those who have a turn for the facetious to share in their jokes, I insert a couple of specimens:—

As luck would have it, my travels brought me to a small country village during the annual 4th of July celebration. I missed the grand ceremonies that take place in the big cities across the country. Since I think it’s often accompanied by details worth considering, I’ll discuss those aspects later in another chapter, focusing on what I believe impacts our national character. On this occasion, I was pleased to observe that while people enjoyed their drinks, there was hardly any sign of drunkenness. Regardless, they had their fair share of fun, similar to what we see at fairs back home. To let those with a sense of humor join in on the fun, I’ve included a couple of examples:—

"Agenda."

"The huge crowd will gather in the Public Square, behind __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__."

the Candy Factory, led by Marshal JOHN A. DITTO, where

they will line up in procession in this order:

"1. Officers of the Day, in their socks."

"2. Revolutionary Relics, led by the esteemed G.W.S."

Mattocks.

"3. Soldiers from the last war, searching for bounty land warrants."

"4. The Mayor and Common Council, pulled in a Willow Wagon, by the"

Habitual Behavior.

"5. Officers of the Hoodoos, pulled by 13 Shanghai Chickens, and driven"

by Joe Garlinghouse's Shanghai Quail.

"6. The Bologna Guards, in their new uniforms, counting their money."

"7. The Ancient Fire Company is expecting their treasurer to contribute $42.50."

under their windows.

"The procession will then walk to the grove behind Smith."

Scovell's barn, where the following activities will happen:—

"1. The reading of the Declaration of Independence—by the Tinker,

Dan.

"2. Speech—by Bill Garrison."

"3. Hymn—There Were Three Crows Sitting in a Tree—by the Hoodo Choir."

"4. Blessing—by Elder Bibbins."

"After that, the crowd will head to Charley Babcock's old spot."

for Snacks.

Menu.—1. Mud Turtle Soup. 2. Hard-boiled Eggs. 3.

Peanuts. 4. Soft boiled eggs. 5. More peanuts.

"Dessert.—Scotch Herring, dried. 2. Same. 3. Same, finished."

brown. 4. Sardines, available upon special request.

"Wines and Liquors.—Hugh Doty's Rattle-Belly Pop. 2."

Hide and Seek (a new brand).

"Exactly at 4:00 PM, the Double Oven Air Calorie Engine,

attached to a beautifully decorated wheelbarrow, will create an

field trip

Conhocton Valley Switch

to the old Hemp Factory and back. It is expected that the President

and Directors will review the Road, and they are scheduled to have the first

chance, solely under the guidance of the 'Rolling Stock.'

"Hello, you freeborn sons of Happy America. 'Wake up, get up, and go!'"

Music—Loud Fife during the day.

June 1853.

"By Order of the Committee."



"CLEAR THE WAY FOR THE LIGHTNING LINE OF MALE AND FEMALE STAGES!!!"

"From Perry to Geneseo and back in a flash."

"BAGGAGE, PERSONAL ITEMS, AND VISION ARE AT THE OWNER'S RISK, AND THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS."

Answered.

"—After purchasing the valuable rights of young Master James Howard

In this line, the subscriber will do it daily between Perry and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

Geneseo, for the delivery of Uncle Sam's mail and family; departing

Perry before the crows wake up in the morning, and arriving at the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__

first house on this side of Geneseo around the same time; coming back,

Leave Geneseo after the crows have settled in for the night, and arrive in Perry by

It's time to join them. Passengers are kindly asked to keep their mouths shut.

out of concern that they might lose their teeth. No smoking is allowed for fear of

Worrying the horses; no talking so it doesn't wake the driver. Fare to match.

travelers.

"The public's very grateful servant, etc., etc."

A quiet and simple stage of rough wood was put up at one end of the village, close to the Court-house, from whence the Declaration of Independence was read, after which a flowery orator—summoned for the occasion, and who travels about to different villages in different years with his well-digested oration—addressed the multitude. Of course similes and figures of rhetoric were lugged in by the heels in every sentence, as is the all but universal practice on such occasions in every part of the world. The moral of his speech was in the main decidedly good, and he urged upon his audience strongly, "the undying advantages of cultivating pluck and education" in preference to "dollars and shrewdness." All went off in a very orderly manner, and in the evening there were fireworks and a village ball. It was at once a wild and interesting sight during the fireworks; the mixture of men, women, and children, some walking, some carried, some riding, some driving; empty buggies, some with horses, some without, tied all round; stray dogs looking for masters as hopelessly as old maids seeking for their spectacles when raised above their eyes and forgotten. Fire companies parading ready for any emergency; the son of mine host tugging away at the rope of the engine in his red shirt, like a juvenile Atlas, as proud as Lucifer, as pleased as Punch. All busy, all excited, all happy; no glimpse of poverty to mar the scene; all come with one voice and one heart to celebrate the glorious anniversary of the birth of a nation, whose past gigantic strides, unparalleled though they be, are insufficient to enable any mind to realize what future is in store for her, if she only prove true to herself.

A quiet and simple stage made of rough wood was set up at one end of the village, near the courthouse, where the Declaration of Independence was read. After that, a flowery speaker—called in for the occasion, who travels to different villages each year with his well-prepared speech—addressed the crowd. Naturally, he included all kinds of similes and rhetorical figures in every sentence, as is the nearly universal practice on such occasions everywhere. The main message of his speech was quite good, and he strongly urged his audience to value "the lasting benefits of developing courage and education" over "money and cleverness." Everything went smoothly, and in the evening, there were fireworks and a village dance. The fireworks created a wild and fascinating spectacle: men, women, and children were mingling, some walking, some being carried, some riding, and some driving; empty buggies—some with horses, some without—were tied all around; stray dogs wandered as hopelessly as old maids searching for their glasses after pushing them up on their heads and forgetting them. Fire companies were parading, ready for any emergency; the innkeeper's son was pulling at the engine rope in his red shirt, like a young Atlas, as proud as can be, and as happy as anyone could be. Everyone was busy, excited, and joyful; there was no sign of poverty to spoil the scene; everyone came together with one voice and one heart to celebrate the glorious anniversary of the birth of a nation, whose past achievements, though impressive, are not enough to help anyone fully grasp what the future holds for her, if she remains true to herself.

Leave-takings do not interest the public, so the reader will be satisfied to know that two days after found me in an open carriage on my way to Rochester. The road lay entirely through cultivated land, and had no peculiar features. The only thing I saw worth noticing, was two men in a light four-wheel one-horse shay, attached to which were at least a dozen others, some on two wheels, some on four. I of course thought they were some country productions going to a city manufacturer. What was my astonishment at finding upon inquiry, that it was merely an American phase of hawking. The driver told me that these people will go away from home for weeks together, trying to sell their novel ware at hamlet, village, farm-house, &c., and that some of the shrewdest of them, the genuine Sam Slick breed, manage to make a good thing of it.

Leave-takings don't interest the public, so you'll be glad to know that two days later, I found myself in an open carriage on my way to Rochester. The road ran entirely through cultivated land and had no special features. The only thing worth noting was two men in a light four-wheeled, one-horse wagon, connected to at least a dozen others, some on two wheels and some on four. Naturally, I thought they were just some local products being taken to a city manufacturer. I was shocked to learn that it was actually just an American version of hawking. The driver explained that these people often leave home for weeks, trying to sell their unique goods at hamlets, villages, farmhouses, etc., and that some of the sharpest ones, the real Sam Slick types, are able to make a good profit from it.

The shades of evening closed in upon me as I alighted at a very comfortable hotel at Rochester. The amiable Morpheus soon claimed me as his own, nor was I well pleased when ruthlessly dragged from his soft embrace at 6-1/2 A.M. the following morning; but railways will not wait for Morpheus or any other deity of fancy or fiction; so, making the best use I could of a tub of water and a beefsteak, and calming my temper with a fragrant weed, I was soon ensconced in one of their cars, a passenger to New York.

The evening settled around me as I arrived at a really nice hotel in Rochester. Sleep quickly took me under its spell, and I wasn't happy when I was roughly pulled from its cozy grip at 6:30 A.M. the next morning; but trains won't wait for sleep or any other dream god. So, I made the best of a wash and a steak, calming my mood with a nice cigarette, and soon found myself settled in one of their cars, on my way to New York.

On reaching Albany, we crossed the river and threw ourselves into the cars of the Hudson River Railway, which, running close to the margin nearly all the way, gives you an ever-varying view of the charming scenery of this magnificent stream. Yankee industry was most disagreeably prominent at several of the stations, in the shape of a bevy of unwashed urchins parading the cars with baskets of the eternal pea-nut and various varieties of lollipop, lemonade, &c., all crying out their wares, and finding as ready a sale for them as they would at any school in England. The baiting-place was not very tempting; we all huddled into one room, where everything was hurry and confusion: besides which, the appetite was not strengthened by the sight of hands—whose owners seemed to have "registered a vow in heaven," to forego the use of soap—turning over the sandwiches, one after another, until they had made their selection. However, the majority approve of the system; and as no thought is given to the minority, "if you don't like it, you may lump it."

Upon reaching Albany, we crossed the river and hopped on the Hudson River Railway cars, which run closely along the shore for most of the journey, offering an ever-changing view of the lovely scenery of this impressive river. Yankee entrepreneurship was unfortunately evident at several stations, where a group of unwashed kids paraded through the cars with baskets of the same old peanuts and various types of lollipops, lemonade, etc., all shouting about their products and selling them just as easily as they would at any school in England. The rest stop wasn’t very inviting; we all crammed into one room, where everything was chaotic and rushed. Plus, our appetite wasn’t helped by the sight of hands—whose owners appeared to have made a "vow in heaven" to avoid soap—sifting through the sandwiches, one after another, until they made their choice. However, the majority seem to like the system; and since little thought is given to the minority, "if you don't like it, tough luck."

But the more permanent inconvenience of this railroad is one for which the majority cannot be held responsible, i.e., it runs three-fourths of the way over a bed of granite, and often between cuts in the solid granite rock, the noise therefore is perfectly stunning; and when to this you add the echoing nature of their long wooden cars, destitute of anything to check the vibrations of sound, except the human cargo and the cushions they sit upon, and when you add further the eternal slamming of the doors at each end by the superintending conductor and the inquisitive portion of the passengers, you may well conceive that this combination is enough to rouse the slumbers of the dead, and rack the brains of the living. At the same time, I must allow that this line runs the best pace and keeps the best time of any in the Union.

But the more lasting problem with this railroad is one that most people can’t be blamed for; it runs three-quarters of the way over a bed of granite, often cutting through solid granite rock, so the noise is truly deafening. And when you factor in the long wooden cars, which have nothing to absorb sound except the passengers and the cushions they sit on, plus the constant banging of the doors at both ends by the supervising conductor and the curious passengers, it’s easy to see that this mix is enough to wake the dead and drive the living crazy. That said, I do have to admit that this line moves at the quickest pace and keeps the best schedule of any in the country.

On reaching the outskirts of New York, I asked, "Is this the proper place for me to get out at?" And being answered in the affirmative, I alighted, and found myself in a broad open street. Scarce had I set my foot on the ground, when I saw the train going on again, and therefore asked for my luggage. After a few questions and answers, I ascertained it had gone on in the train about three miles further; and the only consolation I got, was being told, "I guess you'd best have gone on too." However, all troubles must have an end; so getting into a hackney, I drove to my hospitable friend Phelps' house, where, under the influence of glorious old Madeira—P. had just finished dinner—and most undeniable claret, the past was soon buried in the present; and by the time I had knocked the first ash off one of his best "prensados," the stray luggage returned from the involuntary trip it had made on its own account. What a goodly cheery thing is hospitality, when it flows pure from a warm heart; nor does it lose aught in my estimation when viewed through the medium of a first-rate cellar and the social "Havana."

Upon reaching the outskirts of New York, I asked, "Is this the right place for me to get off?" When I was told it was, I got out and found myself on a wide open street. Just as I stepped onto the ground, I saw the train leaving again, so I inquired about my luggage. After a few questions and answers, I learned it had continued on the train about three miles further; the only consolation I received was being told, "I guess you should've gone on, too." However, all troubles come to an end; so I hopped into a taxi and drove to my friendly host Phelps' house. There, under the influence of glorious old Madeira—P. had just finished dinner—and some excellent claret, the past was quickly forgotten in the moment. By the time I knocked the first ash off one of his best "prensados," my stray luggage returned from its unplanned journey. How wonderful is hospitality when it comes from a warm heart; it doesn't lose any of its charm when seen through the lens of a top-notch wine cellar and good company with a "Havana."

Time progresses—small hours approach—the front door shuts behind some of the guests—six-foot-two of animal life may be seen going up-stairs with a bed-candle; the latter is soon out, and your humble servant is snug in the former.—Reader, good-night!

Time moves on—early morning hours are near—the front door closes behind some of the guests—a six-foot-two figure can be seen going upstairs with a candle for the bed; the candle soon goes out, and your humble servant is cozy in bed.—Reader, goodnight!


CHAPTER XXII.

Education, Civil and Military.




Having said so much of education in other cities, I will only observe, that in regard to common schools, New York is on a par with most of her rivals in this noble strife for superiority; but I must ask those who are interested in the subject to give me their attention while I enter into a few details connected with their admirable Free Academy. The object of this institution is to combine—under one system and under one roof—high school, academy, polytechnic, and college, and to furnish as good an education as can be obtained by passing through each of those places of instruction separately. All this free of cost!

Having talked a lot about education in other cities, I just want to point out that when it comes to public schools, New York is on the same level as most of its competitors in this admirable pursuit of excellence. But I need those who care about this topic to pay attention while I share some details about their impressive Free Academy. The goal of this institution is to combine—under one system and one roof—a high school, academy, polytechnic, and college, providing an education as good as what you would get by attending each of those schools separately. And all of this is free!

A sum of 10,000l. was authorized for the building, and 4000l. annually for its support. The course of instruction is divided into thirteen departments, with a professor at the head of each, aided by tutors where necessary; the whole under a principal, with a salary of 500l. a year, who is at the same time professor of moral, intellectual, and political philosophy. The salaries of the other professors average 300l. a year, those of the tutors 100l. The course of study embraces all that is taught at the four different places of education before-named. The student is allowed to make his selection between the classical languages and the modern—French, Spanish, and German. The whole course occupies five years. The requisites for admission are, that the applicant be thirteen years old, living in the city of New York, and have attended the common schools for eighteen months; besides which he is required to pass a moderate examination. The number of students at present is about 350, but they will doubtless increase. If to the annual expenses of the institution be added the interest at six per cent, on the outlay, the instruction given will be found to cost the inconceivably small sum of 13l. 5s. per scholar, including books, stationery, and etceteras.

A total of £10,000 was approved for the building, along with £4,000 each year for its upkeep. The curriculum is divided into thirteen departments, each led by a professor, supported by tutors as needed; all overseen by a principal, who earns £500 a year and also serves as a professor of moral, intellectual, and political philosophy. The average salary for the other professors is £300 a year, while tutors earn £100. The study program includes everything taught at the four different educational institutions mentioned earlier. Students can choose between classical languages and modern ones—French, Spanish, and German. The entire program lasts five years. To be admitted, applicants must be thirteen years old, reside in New York City, and have attended public schools for eighteen months; additionally, they must pass a moderate exam. Currently, there are about 350 students, but that number will likely grow. If we factor in the annual expenses of the institution plus six percent interest on the initial investment, the cost of instruction turns out to be an incredibly low £13. 5s. per student, which includes books, stationery, and other materials.

Mr. S.B. Ruggles was kind enough to introduce me to Mr. Horace Webster, by whom I was shown over the whole establishment. The cleanliness and good ventilation certainly exceeded that of any other similar establishment which I had visited in the United States. There is a very good library containing 3000 volumes, besides 8000 which are used as text-books, or books of reference. Many publishers supplied the requisite books at reduced prices, which, as long as they retain the ignominious position of the literary pirates of the world, I suppose they can afford to do without inconvenience. There is also a fine studio, full of casts from the best models, and copies of the Elgin marbles presented by Mr. Leap. Instruments of the best quality abound for the explanation of all the sciences taught.

Mr. S.B. Ruggles was nice enough to introduce me to Mr. Horace Webster, who gave me a tour of the entire facility. The cleanliness and air flow were definitely better than any other similar place I had visited in the United States. There’s a great library with 3,000 volumes, in addition to 8,000 used as textbooks or reference materials. Many publishers provided the necessary books at discounted prices, which, as long as they keep their shameful status as literary pirates of the world, I guess they can manage without any issues. There's also a nice studio filled with casts from the best models and copies of the Elgin marbles donated by Mr. Leap. There are plenty of high-quality instruments available for teaching all the sciences offered.

In one of the rooms which I entered there was an examination going on. The subject was astronomy, and it was the first class. I was particularly struck with the very clear manner in which the lad under examination replied to the questions put to him, and I began to suspect it was merely something he had learnt by rote; but the professor dodged him about in such a heartless manner with his "whys" and his "wherefores," his "how do you knows" and "how do you proves," that I quite trembled for the victim. Vain fears on my part; nothing could put him out; he seemed as much at home as the professor, and answered all the questions propounded to him in language as clear and simple as that which the great Faraday employs to instruct his eager listeners at the Royal Institution. Not once could the professor make him trip during the long half-hour of his searching examination. Having remarked that the appearance of the student was rather that of a labouring than of a wealthy stock, I asked the principal who he was. "That, sir," replied Mr. Webster, "is one of our best students, and he is the son of a poor journeyman blacksmith."

In one of the rooms I walked into, there was an exam happening. The subject was astronomy, and it was the first class. I was really impressed by how clearly the student being examined answered the questions. I started to suspect he was just reciting answers he had memorized, but the professor kept throwing tough "why" and "how" questions at him in such a relentless way that I felt nervous for the student. My worries turned out to be pointless; he seemed completely at ease, just like the professor, and responded to all the questions with the same clear and straightforward language that the great Faraday uses to teach his enthusiastic listeners at the Royal Institution. Not once did the professor manage to trip him up during the intense half-hour of his exam. Noticing that the student looked more like a laborer than someone wealthy, I asked the principal who he was. "That, sir," Mr. Webster replied, "is one of our best students, and he is the son of a poor journeyman blacksmith."

New York may point with just pride to her Free Academy, and say, "In our city the struggling efforts of genius are never cramped by the chill blast of poverty, for within those walls the avenues to the highest branches of literature and science are opened without charge to the humblest and most destitute of our citizens." I spent several hours in this most admirable and interesting institution, so ably presided over by Mr. Horace Webster, through whose kindness I was provided with the full details of all its workings. It would seem that the best class of schools for young ladies are not very numerous, for the papers announced the other day that Mrs. Okill had realized 250,000 dollars by her establishment, which could hardly have been the case in the face of good opposition.

New York can proudly highlight its Free Academy and say, "In our city, the efforts of talented individuals are never stifled by the harsh effects of poverty, for within these walls, the paths to the highest levels of literature and science are freely accessible to the humblest and most needy of our citizens." I spent several hours in this remarkable and captivating institution, which is skillfully led by Mr. Horace Webster, who generously provided me with detailed insights into all its operations. It appears that there aren't many top-quality schools for young women, as the news recently reported that Mrs. Okill had made 250,000 dollars from her establishment, which seems unlikely given the strong competition.

A few days afterwards Mr. Ruggles offered to accompany me in a visit I wished to make to the National Military College of West Point. I gladly accepted his proffered kindness, and in due time we were rattling away over the granite-bottomed railroad, along the banks of the Hudson. Close to the station we found a small ferry-boat, ready to take us across to the southern bank. On landing at West Point, "my pipe was immediately put out" by a summary order from a sentry on the wharf. Dropping a tear of sorrow through a parting whiff, and hurling the precious stump into the still waters of the little bay, I followed my cicerone up the hill, and soon found myself in the presence of one of the professors, through whose assistance we were enabled thoroughly to lionize every department. As many of my military friends who have visited West Point have spoken to me in terms of the highest admiration of the institution, I propose entering more into detail than I otherwise might have thought requisite; and I trust that, as military education is engaging a great deal of public interest, the following observations may be found worthy of attention.

A few days later, Mr. Ruggles offered to join me on a visit to the National Military College at West Point. I happily accepted his kind offer, and eventually, we were speeding along the granite-lined railway beside the Hudson River. Near the station, we found a small ferry ready to take us across to the southern bank. Once we landed at West Point, "my pipe was immediately put out" by a direct order from a guard on the wharf. Shedding a tear of sorrow with a final puff, I tossed the precious stub into the calm waters of the little bay and followed my guide up the hill. Before long, I found myself speaking with one of the professors, whose help allowed us to explore every department in detail. Since many of my military friends who have visited West Point have praised the institution, I plan to share more details than I might have otherwise considered necessary. I believe that as military education is gaining a lot of public interest, these observations may be worth your attention.

The candidates for admission are nominated by the members of Congress, one for each congressional district, in addition to which the President of the United States has the nomination of forty from the Republic at large.[AV] The requisites for admission are—the passing a very easy examination, being a bachelor between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one, and having no physical defect. The pay of each cadet is about five pounds a month, of which his board takes two pounds, and 8s. 6d. is laid aside monthly, whereby to form a fund to assist him in the expenses of equipment upon leaving. The balance provides for his dress and other expenses, and a treasurer is appointed to superintend and keep the accounts. The routine of duty prescribed is the following:—Rise at 5 A.M. in summer, and 5-1/2 in winter; double up bed and mattress, &c., and study till 7; then fall in and go to breakfast; at 7-1/2, guard-mounting—twenty-four cadets are on guard every day; at 8, study; at 1 o'clock, break up, fall in, and go to dinner, which they rise from at the word of command, and are then free till 2. From 2 P.M. to 4, study; at 4, drill for one hour and a half, after which they are free till sunset; at sunset, parade in front of the barracks, and delinquents' names called over; then follows supper, after which the cadets are free till 8, at which time there is a call to quarters, and every cadet is required to retire to his own room and study till 9-1/2, when the tattoo is beat; at 10, there is a roll of the drum, at sound whereof every light must be out and every student in bed.

The candidates for admission are nominated by members of Congress, one for each congressional district, and additionally, the President of the United States nominates forty from the entire Republic.[AV] The requirements for admission are a straightforward exam, being a bachelor between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one, and having no physical disabilities. Each cadet earns about five pounds a month, of which two pounds goes to their board, and 8s. 6d. is saved each month to create a fund for their equipment expenses upon graduation. The remainder covers their clothing and other expenses, with a treasurer appointed to manage and keep the accounts. The daily routine is as follows: rise at 5 A.M. in summer and 5:30 in winter; make the bed and mattress, etc., and study until 7; then fall in and go to breakfast; at 7:30, guard-mounting—twenty-four cadets are on guard each day; at 8, more study; at 1 o'clock, break up, fall in, and go to lunch, which they leave when commanded, after which they are free until 2. From 2 P.M. to 4, more study; at 4, drill for one and a half hours, after which they are free until sunset; at sunset, parade in front of the barracks, and names of those who misbehave are called; then follows dinner, after which the cadets are free until 8, when there is a call to quarters, and each cadet is required to return to their own room and study until 9:30, when the tattoo is played; at 10, there is a roll of the drum, at which point all lights must be out and every student must be in bed.

The cadets are organized into a battalion of four companies; the officers and non-commissioned officers are all appointed by the superintendent, from a list submitted to him by the commandant of cadets, the selection being made from those most advanced in their studies and most exemplary in their conduct; they perform in every particular the same duties as those of the officers and privates of a regiment; they have divisions and sub-divisions, with superintendent cadets attached to each, regular orderlies who sweep and clean out the room, furniture, &c.: guards are regularly mounted, an officer of the day duly appointed, and all the duties of a regular barrack punctually performed, even to the sentinels being supplied with ball-cartridge at night. Their uniform is of grey cloth, and their hair is kept a close crop; neither whiskers nor moustache are tolerated, and liquor and tobacco are strictly prohibited. The punishments consist of privation of recreation, extra duty, reprimand, arrest or confinement to room or tent, confinement to light or dark prison, dismission with privilege of resigning, and public dismission; the former of these are at the will of the superintendent—confinement to prison and dismission are by sentence of a court-martial.

The cadets are organized into a battalion of four companies. The officers and non-commissioned officers are appointed by the superintendent from a list provided by the commandant of cadets. This selection is based on those who are the furthest along in their studies and demonstrate exemplary conduct. They perform all the same duties as the officers and privates in a regiment; they have divisions and sub-divisions, with superintendent cadets assigned to each, and regular orderlies responsible for sweeping and cleaning the rooms, furniture, etc. Guards are regularly stationed, an officer of the day is assigned, and all the duties typical of a barrack are carried out punctually, including sentinels being provided with live ammunition at night. Their uniform is made of grey cloth, and their hair is kept closely cropped; whiskers and mustaches are not allowed, and alcohol and tobacco are strictly forbidden. Punishments include loss of recreation time, extra duty, reprimands, arrest or confinement to a room or tent, confinement in light or dark custody, dismissal with the option to resign, and public dismissal. The first punishments are at the discretion of the superintendent—confinement and dismissal require a court-martial sentence.

The course of studies pursued are classed under twelve heads:—1. Infantry tactics and military police; 2. Mathematics; 3. French; 4. Drawing; 5. Chemistry, mineralogy, and geology; 6. Natural and experimental philosophy; 7. Artillery tactics, science of gunnery, and the duties of the military laboratory; 8. Cavalry tactics; 9. The use of the sword; 10. Practical military engineering; 11. Grammar, geography, ethics, &c.; 12. Military and civil engineering, and the science of war.

The course of studies is divided into twelve categories: 1. Infantry tactics and military policing; 2. Mathematics; 3. French; 4. Drawing; 5. Chemistry, mineralogy, and geology; 6. Natural and experimental science; 7. Artillery tactics, gunnery science, and military laboratory duties; 8. Cavalry tactics; 9. Swordsmanship; 10. Practical military engineering; 11. Grammar, geography, ethics, etc.; 12. Military and civil engineering, and the science of warfare.

In the preceding pages we have seen that ten hours are daily devoted to study, besides an hour and a half to drill; and thus, while the brain is severely taxed, but little leisure is left to get into those minor scrapes so prevalent at most public schools.

In the previous pages, we've seen that ten hours a day are spent studying, plus an hour and a half for drill; and so, while the brain is heavily challenged, there's hardly any free time left to get into those little troubles that are common at most public schools.

There is a most minute system of merit and demerit established; everything good and everything bad has a specific value in numbers and decimals, which is accurately recorded against the owners thereof in the reports made for each year. The cadet appears to be expected to improve in conduct as well as knowledge; for, according to the rules, after his first year is completed, the number expressing his absolute demerit is increased by one-sixth during the second year, by one-third during the third year, and by one-half during the fourth year. Thus, suppose a certain number of faults to be represented by the sum of 36, if faults which those figures represent are committed during the second year of the cadet's course, one-sixth would be added, and his name appear on the demerit list with 42 against it; if in the third year, one-third would be added to the 36, and 48 would be placed against his name; and if during the fourth year, one-half would be added, and 54 would appear against it. It will thus be seen that, supposing offences of equal value to be committed by the cadet in his first year and by another in his fourth year, the figures of demerit against the latter would be one-half more than those placed against the name of the cadet in his first year. A demerit conduct roll is made out each year, and a copy sent to the War Department.

There is a detailed system of merit and demerit in place; every good and bad action has a specific value in numbers and decimals, which is accurately recorded for each owner in the annual reports. The cadet is expected to improve both in behavior and knowledge; according to the rules, after completing the first year, the number representing their total demerit increases by one-sixth during the second year, by one-third during the third year, and by one-half during the fourth year. So, for example, if a certain number of faults is represented by 36, and those faults are committed during the cadet's second year, one-sixth is added, making it 42 on the demerit list; in the third year, one-third is added to the 36, resulting in 48; and in the fourth year, one-half is added, making it 54. It can be seen that if a cadet commits offenses of equal value in the first year and another in the fourth year, the latter's demerit figure would be half again as much as the former's. A demerit conduct roll is prepared each year, and a copy is sent to the War Department.

There is also a general merit roll of proficiency and good conduct sent to the same department, an abstract whereof, with demerit added, is sent to the parents or guardians in a printed book containing the names of all the cadets, by which they can at once see the relative position of their son or ward. The following tables will explain the system adopted for ascertaining the merit, demerit, and qualifications of the students:—

There is also a general merit roll of proficiency and good conduct sent to the same department, a summary of which, along with any demerits, is sent to the parents or guardians in a printed book containing the names of all the cadets, allowing them to immediately see the relative position of their son or ward. The following tables will explain the system used to determine the merit, demerit, and qualifications of the students:—

DEMERIT.

Infraction.

Degree of Criminality of Offences, arranged in Classes.

Level of Criminality of Offenses, organized by Classes.

    1. Rebellious behavior                             10  
    2. Ignoring orders from military superiors        8  
    3. Socializing during study time                   5  
    4. Missing drill sessions                          4  
    5. Laziness at the academy                         3  
    6. Lack of focus while armed                       2  
    7. Tardy for roll call                             1  

Form of Conduct Roll made up for the yearly examination.

Conduct report created for the annual assessment.

The column marked "Class" indicates number of years student has been in the academy.

The column labeled "Class" shows how many years the student has been in the academy.

    Name.        Class.         Demerit.

    H.L.           1                5
    C.P.           3               10
    W.K.M.         2              192

A particular case to exemplify the manner of obtaining the numbers in the column of demerit:—

A specific example to illustrate how to get the numbers in the demerit column:—

Cadet W.K.M. was charged with 48 offenses, specifically:  
of the second class of offenses, 2, which when multiplied  
by 8, the number representing the severity of an offense of that class, is            16  
Of the 3rd class   3 multiplied by 5      15  
       4th class       13 "            4      52  
       5th class       10 "            3      30  
       6th class       11 "            2      22  
       7th class         9 "            1       9  
                                         ----  
                                          144  

The Cadet being a member of the  
       2nd class, add 1/3                  48  
                                         ----  
Total demerit                             192  

The following list of Cadets is attached to the Army Register in conformity with a regulation for the Government of the United States Military Academy, requiring the names of the most distinguished Cadets, not exceeding five in each class, to be reported for this purpose at each annual examination:—

The following list of Cadets is attached to the Army Register in accordance with a regulation for the Government of the United States Military Academy, which requires the names of the top five Cadets in each class to be reported for this purpose at each annual examination:—

Reported at the Examination in June, 18—.

Reported at the Exam in June, 18—.

No. Names.        Appointed  Fields of Study where each Cadet
                  from       stands out.

1   First Class.  Mass.      Civil and Military Engineering, Ethics,
    G.L.A.                   Mineralogy and Geology, Infantry
                             Tactics, Artillery, Natural and
                             Experimental Philosophy, Chemistry,
                             Drawing, Mathematics, French, and
                             English.

2   J.St.C.M.     Pa.        Civil and Military Engineering, Ethics,
                             Mineralogy and Geology, Infantry
                             Tactics, Artillery, Natural and
                             Experimental Philosophy, Chemistry,
                             Drawing, Mathematics, and French.

"General Merit Roll," sent also to the War Office.

"General Merit Roll," sent also to the War Office.

    Names             A         B        C
    Mathematics       300.0     295.3    276.7
    French            98.7       97.5     69.1
    English Studies   100.0      89.5     98.9
    Philosophy        300.0     295.6    278.2
    Chemistry         150.0     147.5    145.1
    Drawing            91.3     100.0     94.2
    Engineering       300.0     285.3    290.2
    Ethics            200.0     193.4    186.9
    Mineralogy &
      Geology         100.0      96.7     98.2
    Infantry Tactics  150.0     147.5    137.8
    Artillery         158.0     145.1    147.5
    Conduct           297.3     293.8    294.5
    General Merit    2237.3    2187.2   2117.3

"Official Register of the Cadets" at West Point, printed yearly.

"Official Register of the Cadets" at West Point, printed annually.

    Order of general merit           1            2             3
    Names                         T.L.C.       N.C.A.        G.H.M.
    State                         At large     Tenn.          Pa.
    Date of Admission            July 1, 1848    same           same
    Age at date of admission
    Years / Months                17 / 1     18 / 7        16 / 8
    Order of merit in their
    respective Studies
        Engineering                   1           2             3
        Ethics                        3           4             2
        Mineral. & Geol.              1           2             4
        Infantry Tactics              1           2             5
        Artillery                     2           1             3
    Demerit of the Year              39          18            73

A board with the marks of demerit is always publicly hung up, so that each cadet may know the exact length of his tether, for if the numbers amount to 200 he is dismissed. I have dwelt very lengthily upon the system adopted of recording and publishing the merit and demerit of the students, because I was informed of the admirable effect produced by it. As far as I can judge, it certainly appears not only an admirable means of enabling the War-office to estimate character, but the great publicity given to it must act as a powerful stimulus to exertion and good conduct.

A board displaying demerit points is always publicly displayed, so each cadet can know exactly how far they can go, because if the points reach 200, they get dismissed. I've spent a lot of time discussing the system used for tracking and sharing the merits and demerits of the students, because I was told about the amazing impact it has. From what I can see, it seems not only a fantastic way for the War Office to assess character, but the high visibility of it must serve as a strong motivation for effort and good behavior.

A portion of the cadets are instructed every day in fencing and riding. When well advanced in the latter, they are taught spearing rings or stuffed heads at the gallop, and the same with the sword. The riding-school is perfectly abominable, being dark, full of pillars, and most completely out of harmony with all the rest of the establishment, which is excellent in every detail. On Sundays all the cadets attend church, unless excused on conscientious motives, and with the approval of their parents. The minister is selected by the President, and may be of any denomination. I was told that an Episcopalian had been most frequently chosen. The present minister is, I believe, a Presbyterian. During the months of July and August the cadets all turn out of their barracks, pitch their tents, and live regular camp life—only going to the barracks to eat their meals. During the time they are tented, the education is exclusively military practice; the same hours are kept as in the barracks; the tents are boarded, and two cadets sleep in each. They are all pitched with scrupulous accuracy, and they are obliged to keep their camp as clean as a new pin—performing among themselves every duty of a complete regiment—cleaning their own shoes, fetching their own water, &c. They were all in tents at the time of my visit, and I fear not particularly comfortable, for there had been two days and nights' hard rain, and the wet mattresses were courting the warm rays of the afternoon sun. Whatever jobbery is attempted in the selection of candidates for admission to the Academy, is soon corrected by the Academy itself; for, though the entrance examination is simple to a degree, the subsequent examinations are very severe, and those who cannot come up to the mark get notice to quit; and the unerring tell-tale column of demerit soon obliges the turbulent to "clear out."

A group of cadets is trained every day in fencing and riding. Once they become skilled in riding, they learn how to spear rings or stuffed heads while galloping, and they do the same with a sword. The riding school is really awful; it’s dark, filled with pillars, and completely out of sync with the rest of the excellent facility. On Sundays, all the cadets go to church unless they receive a conscientious objection, which must be approved by their parents. The minister is chosen by the President and can be from any denomination. I was told that an Episcopalian has been the most frequently chosen. The current minister is, I believe, a Presbyterian. During July and August, the cadets all leave their barracks, set up tents, and live a regular camp life—only going back to the barracks for meals. While they’re in tents, their education focuses entirely on military practice; they keep the same hours as in the barracks, the tents are floored, and two cadets share each one. The tents are pitched with meticulous care, and they have to keep their camp as clean as possible—performing every duty of a full regiment themselves—cleaning their own shoes, fetching their own water, etc. They were all in tents during my visit, and I fear they weren’t very comfortable, as it had rained heavily for two days and nights, leaving their mattresses damp and in need of the warm afternoon sun. Any unfairness in choosing candidates for admission to the Academy is quickly fixed by the Academy itself; even though the entrance exam is incredibly simple, the following tests are very tough, and those who can’t meet the standards are asked to leave; the infallible demerit column soon forces the unruly to “clear out.”

The result of this system is, that when I saw them under arms, their soldierlike appearance struck me very much; and the effect produced upon them by discipline was very marked. You might almost guess the time they had been there by their gentlemanly bearing, a quality which they do not readily lose; for the officers of the American army who have been educated at West Point, enjoy a universal reputation for intelligence and gentlemanly bearing wherever they are to be met with.

The result of this system is that when I saw them in uniform, their soldierly appearance really impressed me, and the impact of discipline on them was very obvious. You could almost tell how long they had been there by their polished demeanor, a trait they don’t easily lose; because the officers of the American army who have been trained at West Point have a well-known reputation for intelligence and good manners wherever you encounter them.

The discipline here is no fiction; they do not play at soldiers; they all work their way up from the ranks, performing every duty of each rank, and the most rigid obedience is exacted. In the calculations for demerit, while idleness in the Academy obtains a mark of three, disobedience to a superior officer is marked eight. There is no bullying thought of here; the captain of his company would as soon think of bullying the cadet private as a captain of a regiment of the line would of bullying any private under his command. An officer who had been for many years connected with West Point, told me that among all the duels which unfortunately are so prevalent in the United States, he had never either known or heard of one between any two gentlemen who had received their education at this Academy—tricks, of course, are sometimes played, but nothing oppressive is ever thought of.

The discipline here is real; they don’t pretend to be soldiers. Everyone works their way up from the bottom, doing every job at each level, and strict obedience is required. In the demerit system, while being idle in the Academy gets a mark of three, disobeying a superior officer gets marked eight. There’s no bullying here; the captain of a company would be just as unlikely to bully a cadet private as a captain in a regular regiment would be to bully any private under his command. An officer who had been at West Point for many years told me that among all the duels that are unfortunately common in the United States, he had never known or heard of one between two gentlemen who were educated at this Academy—sure, a few pranks happen, but nothing oppressive is ever considered.

I did hear a story of a cadet, who, by way of a joke, came and tried to take away the musket of a wiry young Kentuckian, who was planted sentry for the first time; but he found a military ardour he had little anticipated; for the novice sentry gave him a crack on the side of the head that turned him round, and before he could recover himself, he felt a couple of inches of cold steel running into the bank situated at the juncture of the hips and the back-bone; and thus not only did he suffer total defeat and an ignominious wound, but he earned a large figure on the demerit roll. From the way the story was told to me, I imagine it is a solitary instance of such an outrage being attempted; for one of the first things they seek to inculcate is a military spirit, and the young Kentuckian at all events proved that he had caught the spirit; nor can it be denied that the method he took to impress it upon his assailant, as a fundamental principle of action, was equally sharp and striking.

I heard a story about a cadet who jokingly tried to take the musket from a wiry young guy from Kentucky, who was on sentry duty for the first time. However, he encountered more military enthusiasm than he expected; the novice sentry hit him on the side of the head, making him turn around. Before he could get his bearings, he felt a couple of inches of cold steel digging into his lower back. So, not only did he face total defeat and a humiliating injury, but he also ended up with a significant mark on the demerit list. From how the story was told to me, it seems this was a rare instance of such a stunt being attempted; one of the first things they try to instill is a military spirit, and the young Kentuckian certainly demonstrated he had embraced that spirit. It's undeniable that the way he made his point was both sharp and memorable.

Happening to be on the ground at the hour of dinner, I saw them all marched off to their great dining-ball, where the table was well supplied with meat, vegetables, and pudding; it was all substantial and good, but the tout-ensemble was decidedly very rough. If the intention is to complete the soldier life by making them live like well-fed privates of the line, the object is attained; but I should be disposed to think, they might dispense with a good deal of the roughness of the style with great advantage; though doubtless, where the general arrangements are so good, they have their own reasons for keeping it as it is. I paid a visit in the course of the afternoon to the fencing-room; but being the hour of recreation, I found about thirty lusty cadets, votaries to Terpsichore, all waltzing and polking merrily to a fiddle, ably wielded by their instructor: as their capabilities were various, the confusion was great, and the master bewildered; but they all seemed heartily enjoying themselves.

Happening to be on the ground at dinner time, I saw them all head off to their big dining hall, where the table was well stocked with meat, vegetables, and pudding; it was all hearty and good, but the overall experience was definitely quite rough. If the goal is to shape the soldier's life by having them live like well-fed privates, that's accomplished; but I think they could easily cut back on some of the roughness and it would be beneficial. Still, I’m sure that with everything else being so organized, they have their reasons for keeping it this way. I visited the fencing room in the afternoon, but since it was recreation time, I found about thirty energetic cadets, dancing joyfully to a fiddle skillfully played by their instructor: since their skills varied, the chaos was significant, and the teacher looked bewildered; yet they all seemed to be having a great time.

The professors and military instructors, &c., have each a small comfortable house with garden attached, and in the immediate vicinity of the Academy. There is a comfortable hotel, which in the summer months is constantly filled with the friends and relatives of the cadets; and occasionally they get permission to give a little soirée dansante in the fencing-room. The hotel is prohibited from selling any spirituous liquors, wines, &c.

The professors and military instructors each have a small, cozy house with a garden nearby the Academy. There's a nice hotel that gets packed with friends and family of the cadets during the summer months; sometimes, they get the chance to host a little soiree dansante in the fencing room. The hotel is not allowed to sell any alcoholic drinks, wines, etc.

The Government property at West Point consists of about three thousand acres: the Academy, professors' houses, hotel, &c., are built upon a large plateau, commanding a magnificent view of the Hudson both ways. The day I was there, the scene was quite lovely; the noble stream was as smooth as a mirror; a fleet of rakish schooners lay helpless, their snow-white sails hanging listlessly in the calm; and, as the clear waters reflected everything with unerring truthfulness, another fleet appeared beneath, lying keel to keel with those that floated on the surface. With such beautiful scenery, and so far removed from the bustle and strife of cities, I cannot conceive any situation better adapted for health and study, pleasure and exercise.

The government property at West Point covers about three thousand acres. The Academy, professors' houses, hotel, etc., are located on a large plateau that offers a stunning view of the Hudson in both directions. The day I visited, the scene was beautiful; the river was as smooth as glass, and a fleet of sleek schooners sat idly, their crisp white sails drooping in the calm. The clear waters reflected everything perfectly, making it look like another fleet was beneath the surface, lying keel to keel with those above. With such beautiful scenery and a peaceful atmosphere far from the hustle and bustle of cities, I can’t imagine a better setting for health, study, enjoyment, and exercise.

The great day of the year is that of the annual review of the cadets by a board of gentlemen belonging to the different States of the Union, and appointed by the Secretary of War; it takes place early in June, I believe, and consequently before the cadets take the tented field. The examination goes on in the library hall, which is a very fine room, and hung with portraits of some of their leading men; the library is a very fair one, and the cadets have always easy access to it, to assist them in their studies. I could have spent many more hours here with much pleasure, but the setting sun warned us no time was to be lost if we wished to save the train; so, bidding adieu, to the friends who had so kindly afforded me every assistance in accomplishing the object of my visit, I returned to the great Babylon, after one of the most interesting and gratifying days I had spent in America.[AW]

The big event of the year is the annual review of the cadets by a panel of gentlemen from different States across the country, appointed by the Secretary of War. It happens in early June, I believe, so it takes place before the cadets head out to the fields. The exam is conducted in the library hall, which is a beautiful room adorned with portraits of prominent figures; the library itself is quite decent, and the cadets always have easy access to it to help with their studies. I could have spent many more enjoyable hours here, but the setting sun reminded us that we needed to hurry if we wanted to catch the train. So, after saying goodbye to the friends who had kindly helped me during my visit, I returned to the big city, having had one of the most interesting and satisfying days I’ve spent in America.[AW]


FOOTNOTES:

Footnotes:

By the published class-list the numbers at present are 224.


An account of a visit to this Academy, from the pen of Sir J. Alexander, is published in Golburn's United Service Magazine, September, 1854.



CHAPTER XXIII.

Watery Highways and Metallic Intercourse.




There is perhaps scarcely any feature in which the United States differ more from the nations of the Old World, than in the unlimited extent of their navigable waters, the value of which has been incalculably increased by the introduction of steam. By massing these waters together, we shall be the better able to appreciate their importance; but in endeavouring to do this, I can only offer an approximation as to the size of the lakes, from the want of any official information, in the absence of which I am forced to take my data from authorities that sometimes differ widely. I trust the following statement will be found sufficiently accurate to convey a tolerably correct idea.

There’s probably no feature that sets the United States apart from the countries of the Old World more than the vastness of their navigable waters, a value that has been tremendously boosted by the arrival of steam power. By grouping these waters together, we can better understand their significance; but in trying to do this, I can only provide an estimate of the size of the lakes due to the lack of official information. In the absence of that, I have to rely on sources that sometimes vary greatly. I hope the following information will be accurate enough to give a reasonably correct idea.

The seaboard on each ocean may be estimated at 1500 miles; the Mississippi and its tributaries, at 17,000 miles; Lake Ontario, at 190 miles by 50; Lake Erie, at 260 miles by 60; Lake Huron, at 200 miles by 70; the Georgian Bay, at 160 miles, one half whereof is about 50 broad; Lake Michigan, at 350 miles by 60; and Lake Superior, at 400 miles by 160, containing 32,000 square miles, and almost capable of floating England, if its soil were as buoyant as its credit. All the lakes combined contain about 100,000 square miles. The rate at which the tonnage upon them is increasing, appears quite fabulous. In 1840 it amounted to 75,000 tons, from which it had risen in 1850 to 216,000 tons. Besides the foregoing, there are the eastern rivers, and the deep bays on the ocean board. Leaving, however, these latter out of the question, let us endeavour to realize in one sum the extent of soil benefited by this bountiful provision of Providence; to do which it is necessary to calculate both sides of the rivers and the shores of the lakes, which, of course, must be of greater extent than double the length of the lakes: nevertheless, if we estimate them at only double, we shall find that there are 40,120 miles washed by their navigable waters; and by the constitution of the Union these waters are declared to be "common property, for ever free, without any tax, duty, or impost whatever."

The coastline of each ocean can be estimated at 1,500 miles; the Mississippi and its tributaries stretch about 17,000 miles; Lake Ontario measures 190 miles long by 50 miles wide; Lake Erie is 260 miles long by 60 miles wide; Lake Huron is 200 miles long by 70 miles wide; Georgian Bay covers 160 miles, with half of it being about 50 miles wide; Lake Michigan spans 350 miles by 60 miles; and Lake Superior is 400 miles long by 160 miles wide, covering 32,000 square miles and easily able to hold England, if its land was as buoyant as its finances. All the lakes together comprise around 100,000 square miles. The rate at which shipping traffic on these lakes is increasing seems almost unbelievable. In 1840, it totaled 75,000 tons, which jumped to 216,000 tons by 1850. In addition to these, there are the eastern rivers and the deep bays along the ocean. However, if we set aside the latter and try to sum up the total area of land benefiting from this generous provision by nature, we need to consider both sides of the rivers and the shores of the lakes. This area would naturally be more than double the length of the lakes; however, if we merely estimate this at double, we’ll find that there are 40,120 miles touched by their navigable waters. According to the Constitution of the Union, these waters are declared to be "common property, forever free, without any tax, duty, or charge at all."

The Americans are not free from the infirmities of human nature; and having got a "good thing" among them, in process of time it became a bone of contention, which it still remains: the Whigs contending that the navigable waters having been declared by the constitution "for ever free," are national waters, and as such, entitled to have all necessary improvements made at the expense of the Union; their opponents asserting, that rivers and harbours are not national, but local, and that their improvements should be exclusively committed to the respective States. This latter opinion sounds strange indeed, when it is remembered that the Mississippi and its tributaries bathe the shores of some thirteen States, carrying on their bosoms produce annually valued at 55,000,000l. sterling, of which 500,000l. is utterly destroyed from the want of any sufficient steps to remove the dangers of navigation.[AX]

The Americans aren't free from the flaws of human nature; and after they found a "good thing" among them, it eventually turned into a point of contention that still persists: the Whigs argue that the navigable waters have been declared by the constitution to be "forever free," making them national waters, and therefore, improvements should be funded by the Union. Their opponents claim that rivers and harbors are not national, but local, and that any improvements should be the responsibility of the individual States. This latter view seems quite odd, especially considering that the Mississippi and its tributaries touch the shores of about thirteen States, carrying annual produce valued at £55,000,000, with £500,000 lost completely due to insufficient measures to address navigational hazards.[AX]

Mr. Ruggles has always been a bold and able advocate of the Whig doctrine of nationality; and, in a lecture delivered by him upon the subject, he states that during the recent struggle to pass the River and Harbour Bill through the Senate, Mr. Douglas, a popular democrat from Illinois, offered as a substitute an amendment giving the consent of Congress "to the levy of local tonnage dues, not only by each of the separate States, but even by the authorities of any city or town." One can hardly conceive any man of the most ordinary intellect deliberately proposing to inflict upon his country the curse of an unlimited legion of custom-houses, arresting commerce in every bend of the river and in every bay of the sea; yet such was the case, though happily the proposition was not carried. How inferior does the narrow mind which made the above proposition in 1848 appear, when placed beside the prescient mind which in 1787 proposed and carried, "That navigable waters should be for ever free from any tax or impost whatever!"

Mr. Ruggles has always been a strong and capable supporter of the Whig idea of nationality. In a lecture he gave on the topic, he stated that during the recent effort to pass the River and Harbour Bill in the Senate, Mr. Douglas, a well-known Democrat from Illinois, suggested an amendment that would allow Congress to agree to local tonnage fees, not just by individual States, but even by the authorities of any city or town. It's hard to believe that any person with even a modicum of intelligence would intentionally propose to burden his country with countless customs houses, hindering trade at every bend in the river and in every bay at sea; yet that was the situation, although thankfully the proposal didn’t go through. How much lesser the narrow-mindedness of the individual who proposed this idea in 1848 appears when compared to the visionary thinking that in 1787 advocated for, "That navigable waters should be forever free from any tax or impost whatever!"


One of the most extraordinary instances of routine folly which I ever read or heard of, and which, among so practical and unroutiney a people as the Americans, appears all but incredible, is the following:—Congress having resisted the Harbour Improvement Bill, but acknowledged its duties as to certain lights and beacons, "Ordered, that a beacon should be placed on a rock in the harbour of New Haven. The engineer reported, that the cost of removing the rock would be less than the cost of erecting the beacon; but the President was firm—a great party doctrine was involved, and the rock remains to uphold the beacon—a naked pole, with an empty barrel at its head—a suitable type of the whole class of constitutional obstructions."[AY]

One of the most unbelievable cases of everyday stupidity that I’ve ever read or heard about, and which seems almost unbelievable given how practical and unconventional Americans are, is the following: Congress opposed the Harbour Improvement Bill but recognized its obligations regarding certain lights and beacons. They "ordered that a beacon be placed on a rock in the harbor of New Haven. The engineer reported that removing the rock would cost less than putting up the beacon; however, the President was insistent—a major party principle was at stake—and the rock still stands to support the beacon—a bare pole with an empty barrel on top—an appropriate symbol of all the constitutional hurdles." [AY]

The State of New York may fairly claim the credit of having executed one of the most—if not the most—valuable public works in the Union—the Erie Canal. At the time of its first proposal, it received the most stubborn opposition, especially from that portion of the democratic party known by the appellation of "Barn-burners," whose creed is thus described in a pamphlet before me:—"All accumulations of wealth or power, whether in associations, corporate bodies, public works, or in the state itself, are anti-democratic and dangerous.... The construction of public works tends to engender a race of demagogues, who are sure to lead the people into debt and difficulty," &c. The origin of their name I have not ascertained.

The State of New York can rightfully take credit for having completed one of the most—if not the most—valuable public works in the country—the Erie Canal. When it was first proposed, it faced fierce opposition, particularly from a faction within the Democratic Party known as the "Barn-burners." Their beliefs are outlined in a pamphlet in front of me: "All accumulations of wealth or power, whether in associations, corporations, public works, or within the state itself, are anti-democratic and dangerous.... The construction of public works tends to create a class of demagogues who will inevitably lead the people into debt and trouble," etc. I have not determined the origin of their name.

Another party, possessing the equally euphonical name of "Old Hunkers," are thus described:—"Standing midway between this wing of the Democracy and the Whig party, is that portion who have taken upon themselves the comfortable title of 'Old Hunkers.' The etymological origin of this epithet is already lost in obscurity. They embrace a considerable portion of our citizens who are engaged in banking and other active business, but at the same time decided lovers of political place and power. At heart they believe in progress, and are in favour of a liberal prosecution of works of improvement, but most generally disguise it, in order to win the Barn-burners' votes. They are by no means deficient in intelligence or private worth, but are deeply skilled in political tactics; and their creed, if it is rightly understood, is that public works ought to be 'judiciously' prosecuted, provided they themselves can fill all the offices of profit or honour connected with their administration."[AZ]

Another group, known as "Old Hunkers," is described as follows:—"Sitting between this faction of the Democratic Party and the Whig Party, there are those who have adopted the comfortable title of 'Old Hunkers.' The origin of this term is now shrouded in mystery. They include a significant number of our citizens involved in banking and other active businesses, yet they are also strong advocates for political positions and power. Deep down, they support progress and advocate for a generous approach to improvement projects, but they often conceal these beliefs to attract votes from the Barn-burners. They are certainly not lacking in intelligence or personal integrity, but they are highly skilled in political strategy; their actual belief, if understood correctly, is that public works should be pursued 'judiciously,' as long as they can secure all the profitable or prestigious positions related to their management."[AZ]

Such is the description given of these two parties by the pen of a political opponent, who found in them the greatest obstacles to the enlargement of the canal.

Such is the description of these two parties by a political opponent, who saw them as the biggest obstacles to expanding the canal.

The name of De Witt Clinton will ever be associated with this great and useful work, by which the whole commerce of the ocean lakes is poured into the Hudson, and thence to the Atlantic. After eight years' hard struggle, and the insane but undivided opposition of the city of New York, the law for the construction of the canal was passed in the year 1817. One opponent to the undertaking, when the difficulty of supplying water was started as an objection, assisted his friend by the observation, "Give yourself no trouble—the tears of our constituents will fill it." Many others opposed the act on the ground that, by bringing the produce of the States on the lake shores so easily to New York, the property of the State would be depreciated; which appears to me, in other words, to be—they opposed it on the ground of its utility. Others again grounded their objections on the doubt that the revenue raised by the tolls would be sufficient to justify the expense. Fortunately, however, the act was carried; and in seven years, the canal, though not quite completed, was receiving tolls to the amount of upwards of 50,000l. In 1836 the canal debt was paid, and produce valued at 13,000,000l.—of which 10,000,000l. belonged to the State of New York—was carried through it; the tolls had risen to 320,000l. per annum, and 80,000l. of that sum was voted to be appropriated to the general purposes of the State, the total cost having been under one and a half million sterling.

The name De Witt Clinton will always be linked to this significant and beneficial project, which channels all the commerce of the Great Lakes into the Hudson River, and then to the Atlantic Ocean. After eight years of hard work and the crazy but relentless opposition from the city of New York, the law to build the canal was passed in 1817. One opponent to the project, when the issue of supplying water was raised as a concern, helped his friend by saying, “Don't worry—the tears of our constituents will fill it.” Many others opposed the law because they believed that by making it easier to bring products from the lake shore states to New York, the state's property values would drop; which seems to me, in other words, to be—they opposed it because of its usefulness. Some others questioned whether the revenue from tolls would be enough to cover the costs. Fortunately, the law passed; and in seven years, the canal, although not completely finished, was collecting tolls of over £50,000. By 1836, the canal debt was paid off, and products valued at £13,000,000—of which £10,000,000 belonged to the State of New York—were transported through it; the tolls had increased to £320,000 a year, with £80,000 of that designated for the state's general purposes, while the total cost had been under one and a half million pounds.

One might imagine that such triumphant success would have made the State ready to vote any reasonable sum of money to enlarge it if required; but the old opponents took the field in force when the proposition was made. Even after a certain sum had been granted, and a contract entered into, they rescinded the grant and paid a forfeit to the contractor of 15,000l. It was in vain that the injury to commerce, resulting from the small dimensions of the canal,[BA] was represented to them; it was in vain that statistics were laid before them, showing that the 7,000,000 miles traversed by the 4500 canal-boats might, if the proposed enlargement took place, reduce the distance traversed to two millions of miles, and the boats employed to 1500; Barn-burners triumphed, and it was decided that the enlargements should only be made out of the surplus proceeds of the tolls and freight; by which arrangement this vast commercial advantage will be delayed for many years, unless the fruits of the canal increase more rapidly than even their present wonderful strides can lead one to anticipate, although amounting at this present day to upwards of 1,000,000l. yearly.[BB] Such is a short epitome of a canal through which, when the Sault St. Marie Channel between Lakes Superior and Huron is completed, an unbroken watery highway will bear the rich produce of the West from beyond the 90° meridian of longitude to the Atlantic Ocean.[BC]

One might think that such overwhelming success would have made the State willing to approve any reasonable amount of money to expand it if needed; however, the old opponents stepped in forcefully when the proposal was made. Even after a specific amount had been approved and a contract signed, they revoked the grant and paid a fine of 15,000l to the contractor. It was pointless to explain the damage to trade caused by the canal’s small size,[BA] or to present statistics showing that the 7,000,000 miles traveled by the 4,500 canal boats could, with the proposed expansion, be reduced to 2 million miles, and the number of boats to 1,500; the barn-burners celebrated, and it was decided to only carry out the expansions using the surplus from tolls and freight. This arrangement will delay this significant commercial advantage for many years unless the canal's usage increases even faster than its already remarkable growth, currently amounting to over 1,000,000l annually.[BB] This is a brief overview of a canal that, when the Sault St. Marie Channel between Lakes Superior and Huron is completed, will create an unbroken waterway transporting the rich resources of the West from beyond the 90° longitude to the Atlantic Ocean.[BC]

Although the Erie is perhaps the canal which bears the most valuable freight, it is by no means the greatest undertaking of the kind in the Union. The Chesapeake and Ohio canal, uniting Washington and Pittsburg, has nearly 400 locks, and is tunnelled four miles through the Alleghanies; and the Pennsylvania canal, as we have already seen in a former chapter, runs to the foot of the same ridge, and being unable to tunnel, uses boats in compartments, and drags them by stationary engines across the mountains. Nothing daunts American energy. If the people are once set upon having a canal, go ahead it must; "can't" is an unknown expression.[BD]

Although the Erie might be the canal that carries the most valuable cargo, it’s by no means the largest project of its kind in the country. The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, which connects Washington and Pittsburgh, has nearly 400 locks and is tunneled four miles through the Allegheny Mountains. The Pennsylvania Canal, as we’ve already discussed in a previous chapter, extends to the base of the same ridge and, unable to tunnel, uses compartmentalized boats that are pulled by stationary engines over the mountains. Nothing discourages American determination. If people decide they want a canal, it’s going to happen; “can’t” is simply not in their vocabulary.[BD]

However important the works we have been considering may be to the United States, there can be no doubt that railways are infinitely more so; I therefore trust the following remarks upon them may have some interest.

However important the works we've been discussing may be to the United States, there's no doubt that railways are way more important; I hope the following comments on them will be of some interest.

By the statement of the last Census, it appears that there are no less than 13,266 miles of railroad in operation, and 12,681 in progress, giving a total of nearly 26,000 miles; the cost of those which are completed amounts to a little less than 75,000,000l., and the estimate for those in progress is a little above 44,000,000l. We thus see that the United States will possess 26,000 miles of railroad, at the cost of about 120,000,000l. In England we have 8068 miles of railway, and the cost of these amounts to 273,860,000l., or at the rate of 34,020l. per mile. This extraordinary difference between the results produced and the expenses incurred requires some little explanation. By the Census report, I learn that the average expense of the railways varies in different parts of the Union; those in the northern, or New England States, costing 9250l. per mile; those in the middle States, 8000l.; and those in the southern and western States, 4000l. per mile. The railway from Charleston to Augusta, on the Savannah River, only cost 1350l. per mile. From the above we see clearly that the expenses of their railways are materially affected by density of population and the consequent value of land, by the comparative absence of forest to supply material, and by the value of labour. If these three causes produce such material differences in a country comparatively unoccupied like the United States, it is but natural to expect that they should be felt with infinitely more force in England. Moreover, as it has been well observed by Captain D. Galton, R.E.,[BE] "railways originated in England, and therefore the experience which is always required to perfect a new system has been chiefly acquired in this country, and has increased the cost of our own railways for the benefit of our neighbours."—Some conception may be formed of the irregular nature of the expense on the lines in England from the statement subjoined, also taken from the same paper, viz.:—

By the last Census, it appears that there are 13,266 miles of railroad in operation and 12,681 miles under construction, totaling nearly 26,000 miles. The cost of the completed railroads is just under £75,000,000, while the estimate for those in progress is slightly above £44,000,000. Thus, we can see that the United States will have 26,000 miles of railroad at a cost of about £120,000,000. In England, we have 8,068 miles of railway, and the cost for these amounts to £273,860,000, which is about £34,020 per mile. This significant difference between the results achieved and the expenses incurred needs some explanation. According to the Census report, the average cost of railways varies in different parts of the country; in the northern or New England States, they cost £9,250 per mile; in the middle States, £8,000; and in the southern and western States, £4,000 per mile. The railway from Charleston to Augusta, on the Savannah River, only cost £1,350 per mile. From this, we can clearly see that the costs of their railways are heavily influenced by population density and the resulting land value, the relative lack of forests for materials, and labor costs. If these three factors lead to such significant differences in a relatively unpopulated country like the United States, it’s natural to expect that they would be felt even more intensely in England. Furthermore, as noted by Captain D. Galton, R.E., "railways originated in England, and therefore the experience necessary to perfect a new system has been mainly acquired in this country, which has raised the cost of our own railways for the benefit of our neighbors."—Some understanding of the irregular nature of expenses on the lines in England can be obtained from the information provided in the statement below, also taken from the same paper:—

    Name of Railway.  Land and                               Total Cost
                      Compensation.      Works.    Rails.     per Mile.
                           £               £          £           £

    London       }
    and          }      113,500          98,000     1,000   253,000[BF]
    Blackwall    }

    Leicester    }
    and          }        1,000           5,700       700     8,700[BF]
    Swannington  }

From the table on the opposite page, it will be seen that the cost of construction and engineering expenses amounted to 35,526,535l. out of 45,051,217l. Taking the railways quoted as representing a fair average of the whole, we ascertain that more than one-fourth of the expense of our railways is incurred for extras comparatively unknown in the United States. At a general meeting of the London and North Western, in 1854, Mr. Glyn mentioned as a fact, that a chairman of a certain line, in giving evidence, had stated that a competition for the privilege of making 28 miles of railway had cost 250,000l. Such an item of expenditure can hardly enter into the cost of a railway in a country as thinly populated as the Republic. There are also two other important facts which are apt to be overlooked: first, that a great portion of the railways in the United States are single lines; and secondly, that the labour performed is of a far less solid and enduring character. A most competent civil engineer told me that the slovenly and insecure nature of many of the railway works in the United States was perfectly inconceivable, and most unquestionably would not stand the inspection required in England. A friend of mine has travelled upon a railway in America, between Washington and Virginia, of which a great portion was composed of merely a wooden rail with a bar of iron screwed on to the surface.[BG] The carriages are also far less expensive and comfortable; a carriage in the United States, which carries fifty people, weighs twelve tons, and costs 450l.; in England it may be fairly asserted, that for every fifty people in a mixed train there is a carriage weight of eighteen tons, at a cost of 1500l.

From the table on the opposite page, you can see that the cost of construction and engineering expenses amounted to 35,526,535l out of 45,051,217l. Taking the railways as a fair average of the whole, we find that more than one-fourth of the expense of our railways is attributed to extras that are relatively unknown in the United States. At a general meeting of the London and North Western in 1854, Mr. Glyn noted a fact where a chairman of a certain line, while giving evidence, mentioned that a competition for the privilege of building 28 miles of railway had cost 250,000l. Such an expense is unlikely to factor into the cost of a railway in a country with a sparse population like the Republic. There are also two other important points that are often overlooked: first, that a significant portion of the railways in the United States are single lines, and second, that the labor performed is of a much less solid and durable nature. A very qualified civil engineer told me that the sloppy and insecure construction of many railway works in the United States is completely unimaginable and would definitely not meet the inspection standards in England. A friend of mine traveled on a railway in America, between Washington and Virginia, where a large part consisted merely of a wooden rail with a bar of iron screwed onto the surface.[BG] The carriages are also much less expensive and comfortable; a carriage in the United States that carries fifty people weighs twelve tons and costs 450l; in England, it can be fairly said that for every fifty people in a mixed train, there is a carriage that weighs eighteen tons at a cost of 1500l.

The following Table, extracted from a Return moved for by Lord Brougham, may help to give a better general idea of the reason why our Railroads have been so costly:—

The following table, taken from a request made by Lord Brougham, may help provide a clearer overall understanding of why our railroads have been so expensive:—

    Name of       London &   Great        Midland,  South Eastern  Total  
    Railway.      North      Western,     and 12    and 6  
                  Western,   and 3        branches  branches  
                  and 12     branches  
                  branches  

    Length/Miles     433      215.75      449.25    198.5      1296.5  

    Cost of Con-  
    struction. £ 13,302,313  6,961,011   9,064,089  5,375,366    34,702,779  

    Conveyance  
    and Law  
    Charges. £      143,479    105,269     119,344    138,034       506,128  

    Cost of  
    Land. £       3,153,226  1,132,964   1,764,582  1,458,627     7,509,399  

    Parliamentary  
    Expenses. £     555,698    245,139     287,853    420,467     1,509,157  

    Engineering  
    and Sur-  
    veying. £       289,698    201,909     216,110    116,039       823,756  

    Total  
    Cost.  £     17,444,414  8,646,292  11,451,978  7,508,533    45,051,217  

When all the foregoing facts are taken into consideration, it must appear clear to the reader, that until the efficiency of the work done, the actual number of miles of rail laid down, and the comfort enjoyed are ascertained, any comparison of the relative expenses of the respective railways must be alike useless and erroneous; at the same time, it can scarcely be denied that it is impossible to give the Republic too much credit for the energy, engineering skill, and economy with which they have railway-netted the whole continent. Much remains for them to do in the way of organizing the corps of officials, and in the erection of proper stations, sufficient at all events, to protect travellers from the weather, for which too common neglect the abundance of wood and their admirable machinery leave them without excuse; not that we are without sin ourselves in this last particular. The uncovered station at Warrington is a disgrace to the wealthy London and North Western Company, and the inconveniences for changing trains at Gretna junction is even more disreputable; but these form the rare exceptions, and as a general rule, there cannot be the slightest comparison between the admirably arranged corps of railway servants in England, and the same class of men in the States; nor between the excellent stations in this country, and the wretched counterpart thereof in the Republic. Increased intercourse with Europe will, it is to be hoped, gradually modify these defects; but as long as they continue the absurd system of running only one class of carriage, the incongruous hustling together of humanities must totally prevent the travelling in America being as comfortable as that in the Old World.

When you consider all the facts mentioned above, it should be clear to the reader that until we know how effective the work is, the actual number of miles of rail laid down, and the comfort experienced, any comparison of the costs of the different railways is going to be pointless and inaccurate. At the same time, it’s hard to deny that the Republic deserves a lot of credit for the energy, engineering skill, and cost-effectiveness with which they have connected the entire continent with railways. There’s still a lot to do in terms of organizing the officials and building proper stations that at least protect travelers from the weather—something they have no excuse for neglecting, considering the abundance of wood and their excellent machinery. We’re not without fault in this regard either. The open station at Warrington is an embarrassment for the wealthy London and North Western Company, and the inconvenience of changing trains at Gretna Junction is even worse. However, these are rare exceptions. Generally, there’s no real comparison between the well-organized railway staff in England and their counterparts in the States, nor between the great stations here and the poor equivalents in the Republic. Hopefully, increased interaction with Europe will help gradually fix these issues, but as long as they maintain the ridiculous practice of only running one class of carriage, the chaotic mix of travelers will keep American train travel from being as comfortable as it is in the Old World.

Let us now turn from that which carries our bodies at the rate of forty miles an hour, to that last giant stride of science by which our words are carried quick as thought itself—the Telegraph. The Americans soon discovered that this invention was calculated to be peculiarly useful to them, owing to their enormous extent of territory; and having come to this conclusion, their energy soon stretched the electric messenger throughout the length and breadth of the land, and by the last Census the telegraphic lines extend 16,735 miles, and the length of wires employed amounts to 23,281. The Seventh Census gives the expense of construction as 30l. per mile.[BH] The systems in use are Morse's, House's, and Bain's; the two former of American invention, the latter imported from this country. Of these three the system most generally employed is Morse's, the others being only worked upon about 2000 miles each. It would be out of place to enter into any scientific explanation of their different methods in these pages; suffice it to say, that all three record their messages on ribands of paper; Morse employing a kind of short-hand symbol which indents the paper; Bain, a set of symbols which by chemical agency discolour the paper instead of indenting it; and House printing Roman letters in full by the discolouring process. Those who wish for details and explanations, will find them in the works of Dr. Lardner and others on the Telegraph.

Let’s shift our focus from the vehicles that carry us at forty miles an hour to that remarkable leap in science that lets our words travel as fast as thought itself—the Telegraph. Americans quickly realized that this invention was especially beneficial for them due to their vast territory. Once they understood this, their determination quickly spread the electric messenger across the entire country, and by the last Census, telegraphic lines covered 16,735 miles, with a total length of wires reaching 23,281. The Seventh Census estimates the construction cost at 30l per mile.[BH] The systems in use include Morse's, House's, and Bain's; the first two were invented in America, while the latter was imported from Britain. Among these, Morse's system is the most commonly used, with the others each operating on about 2,000 miles. It wouldn't be appropriate to provide a scientific breakdown of their different methods here; it's enough to note that all three record messages on strips of paper. Morse uses a shorthand symbol that makes indentations, Bain employs a set of symbols that discolor the paper chemically instead of indenting it, and House prints full Roman letters through the discoloration process. Those interested in more details and explanations can refer to the works of Dr. Lardner and others on the Telegraph.

The following anecdote will give some idea of the rapidity with which they work. A house in New York expected a synopsis of commercial news by the steamer from Liverpool. A swift boat was sent down to wait for the steamer at the quarantine ground. Immediately the steamer arrived, the synopsis was thrown into the boat, and away she went as fast as oars and sails could carry her to New York. The news was immediately telegraphed to New Orleans and its receipt acknowledged back in three hours and five minutes, and before the steamer that brought it was lashed alongside her wharf. The distance to New Orleans by telegraph is about 2000 miles. The most extensive purchases are frequently made at a thousand miles distance by the medium of the telegraph. Some brokers in Wall-street average from six to ten messages per day throughout the year. I remember hearing of a young officer, at Niagara Falls, who, finding himself low in the purse, telegraphed to New York for credit, and before he had finished his breakfast the money was brought to him. Cypher is very generally used for two reasons; first, to obtain the secrecy which is frequently essential to commercial affairs; and secondly, that by well-organized cypher a few words are sufficient to convey a long sentence.

The following story will illustrate how quickly they work. A company in New York was expecting a summary of business news from the steamer coming in from Liverpool. A fast boat was dispatched to wait for the steamer at the quarantine area. As soon as the steamer arrived, the summary was tossed into the boat, and off it went as fast as oars and sails could manage to New York. The news was promptly telegraphed to New Orleans, and they acknowledged receipt in just three hours and five minutes, even before the steamer that brought the news was secured at the dock. The distance to New Orleans by telegraph is about 2000 miles. Major purchases are often made from places a thousand miles away using the telegraph. Some brokers on Wall Street send an average of six to ten messages per day throughout the year. I remember hearing about a young officer at Niagara Falls who, running low on cash, sent a telegram to New York for credit, and by the time he finished his breakfast, the money was delivered to him. Cipher is widely used for two main reasons: first, to ensure the confidentiality that's often crucial in business, and second, a well-structured cipher allows a few words to convey a lengthy message.

Among other proposed improvements is one to transmit the signature of individuals, maps and plans, and even the outlines of the human face, so as to aid in the apprehension of rogues, &c. By a table of precedence, Government messages, and messages for the furtherance of justice and detection of criminals, are first attended to; then follow notices of death, or calls to a dying bed; after which, is the Press, if the news be important; if not, it takes its turn with the general, commercial, and other news. The wires in America scorn the railway apron-strings in which they are led about in this country. They thread their independent course through forests, along highways and byways, through streets, over roofs of houses,—everybody welcomes them,—appearance bows down at the shrine of utility, and in the smallest villages these winged messengers are seen dropping their communicative wires into the post-office, or into some grocer's shop where a 'cute lad picks up all the passing information—which is not in cypher—and probably retails it with an amount of compound interest commensurate with the trouble he has taken to obtain it. There is no doubt that many of these village stations are not sure means of communication, partly perhaps from carelessness, and partly from the trunk arteries having more important matter to transmit, and elbowing their weaker neighbours out of the field. Their gradual increase is, however, a sufficient proof that the population find them useful, despite the disadvantages they labour under. In some instances, they have shown a zeal without discretion, for a friend of mine, lately arrived from the Far West, informs me, that in many places the wires may be seen broken, and the poles tumbling down for miles and miles together, the use of the telegraph not being sufficient even to pay for the keeping up. This fact should be borne in mind when we give them the full benefit of the 16,735 miles according to their own statement in The Seventh Census.

Among other suggested improvements is one to send signatures of individuals, maps and plans, and even outlines of human faces, to help catch criminals, etc. According to a priority list, government messages and those for the furtherance of justice and criminal detection are handled first; following that are notices of death or calls to someone's bedside; then comes the press, if the news is significant; if not, it waits its turn alongside general, commercial, and other news. In America, the wires are independent, not tied down by the railway constraints common here. They weave their way through forests, along highways and backroads, through streets, over rooftops—everyone welcomes them; practicality takes precedence over appearance, and in the smallest villages, these speedy messengers are seen dropping off their informative wires at the post office or at a local grocery store where a savvy kid gathers all the available news—which isn't coded—and likely shares it at a markup proportional to the effort he put in to get it. There's no doubt that many of these village stations aren't reliable communication means, partly due to carelessness and partly because the main lines have more important information to send and push their less essential counterparts aside. Their gradual increase, however, is clear evidence that the population finds them useful, despite the challenges they face. In some cases, they've exhibited enthusiasm without caution, as a friend of mine who just came from the Far West tells me that in many places the wires are broken and the poles are toppled for miles and miles, with the telegraph usage not even covering the maintenance costs. This should be considered when we evaluate them against the claimed 16,735 miles listed in The Seventh Census.

The very low tariff of charge renders the use of the telegraph universal throughout the Union. In Messrs. Whitworth's and Wallis's report, they mention an instance of a manufacturer in New York, who had his office in one part of the town and his works in an opposite direction, and who, to keep up a direct communication between the two, erected a telegraph at his own expense, obtaining leave to carry it along over the tops of the intervening houses without any difficulty. The tariff alluded to above will of course vary according to the extent of the useful pressure of competition. I subjoin two of their charges as an example. From Washington to Baltimore is forty miles, and the charge is 10d. for ten words. From New York to New Orleans is two thousand miles, and the charge for ten words is ten shillings. It must be remembered that these ten words are exclusive of the names and addresses of the parties sending and receiving the message.

The very low service fee makes using the telegraph common throughout the country. In the report by Messrs. Whitworth and Wallis, they note an example of a manufacturer in New York who had his office in one part of the city and his factory in the opposite direction. To maintain direct communication between the two, he built a telegraph line at his own expense, getting permission to run it over the tops of the houses in between without any issues. The fee mentioned will naturally change based on the level of competition. I’ll list two of their charges as an example. From Washington to Baltimore, which is forty miles away, the cost is 10d for ten words. From New York to New Orleans, which is two thousand miles, the cost for ten words is ten shillings. It's important to note that these ten words do not include the names and addresses of the senders and receivers of the message.

The extent to which the telegraph is used in the United States, induced those interested in the matter in England to send over for the most competent and practical person that could be obtained, with the view of ascertaining how far any portion of the system employed by them might be beneficially introduced into our country. The American system is that of the complete circuit, and therefore requiring only one wire; and the patent of Bain was the one experimented with, as requiring the slightest intensity of current. After considerable expense incurred in trials, the American system was found decidedly inferior to our own, solely owing to the humidity of our climate, which, after repeated trials, has been found to require a far more perfect insulation than is necessary either in the United States or on the Continent, and therefore requiring a greater outlay of capital in bringing the telegraphic wire into a practical working state; 260 miles is the greatest length that a battery is equal to working in this country in the worst weather.

The level of telegraph usage in the United States prompted those interested in the subject in England to send over the most skilled and practical person they could find to determine how much of their system could be effectively introduced here. The American system uses a complete circuit, meaning it only needs one wire, and they tried Bain's patent since it required the least amount of current. After spending a lot on tests, it turned out that the American system was definitely not as good as ours, primarily due to the humidity of our climate, which has been shown, after several trials, to need much better insulation than what's needed in the U.S. or on the Continent. This results in needing more investment to make the telegraphic wire work effectively. In the worst weather, a battery in this country can only support a maximum length of 260 miles.

Bain's system was formerly not sufficiently perfected to work satisfactorily in our climate; recent improvements are removing those objections, and the employment of it is now rapidly increasing. The advantages that Bain's possesses over Morse's are twofold: first, the intensity of current required to work it is lighter; and secondly, the discoloration it produces is far more easily read than the indentations of Morse's. The advantage Morse's possesses over Bain's is, that the latter requires damp paper to be always ready for working, which the former does not. The advantage Cook and Wheatstone's[BI] possesses over both the former is, that it does not demand the same skilled hands to wind and adjust the machine and prepare the paper; it is always ready at hand, and only needs attention at long intervals, for which reasons it is more generally employed at all minor and intermediate stations; its disadvantages are, that it does not trace the message, and consequently leaves no telegraphic record for reference, and it requires two wires, while Bain's or Morse's employs but one; the intensity of the current required to work it is the same as Bain's, and rather less than Morse's. All three admit of messages going the whole length of the line being read at all intermediate stations. The proportion of work capable of being done by Bain's, as compared with Cook and Wheatstone's, is: Bain's and one wire = 3; Cook and Wheatstone's and two wires = 5. But if Bain's had a second wire, a second set of clerks would be requisite to attend to it. The errors from the tracing telegraph are less than those from the magnetic needle; but the difference is very trifling. No extra clerk is wanted by Cook and Wheatstone's, as all messages are written out by a manifold writer. Every message sent by telegraph in England has a duplicate copy sent by rail to the "Clearing Office," at Lothbury, to be compared with the original; thanks to which precaution, clerks keep their eyes open, and the public are efficiently protected from errors.

Bain's system wasn’t developed enough to work well in our climate before; recent improvements are addressing these issues, and its use is quickly increasing. Bain’s advantages over Morse’s are twofold: first, it requires a lighter current to operate, and second, its discoloration is much easier to read than Morse’s indentations. The benefit Morse’s has over Bain’s is that Bain’s always needs damp paper ready to use, which Morse's does not. Cook and Wheatstone’s has an edge over both of the others because it doesn’t need the same level of skill to wind and adjust the machine and prepare the paper; it’s always ready to go and only requires attention at long intervals. For these reasons, it’s more commonly used at smaller and intermediate stations. Its drawbacks are that it doesn’t trace the message, leaving no telegraphic record for reference, and it needs two wires, whereas Bain’s and Morse’s only use one. The current required to operate it is the same as Bain’s and slightly less than Morse’s. All three systems allow messages to be read at any intermediate stations along the entire length of the line. The amount of work Bain's can do compared to Cook and Wheatstone's is: Bain's with one wire = 3; Cook and Wheatstone's with two wires = 5. However, if Bain's had a second wire, a second set of clerks would be needed to manage it. The errors from the tracing telegraph are fewer than those from the magnetic needle, but the difference is very small. Cook and Wheatstone's doesn’t require an extra clerk since all messages are written out by a manifold writer. Every telegraph message sent in England has a duplicate copy sent by rail to the "Clearing Office" at Lothbury for comparison with the original; this precaution ensures clerks are diligent, and the public is well-protected from errors.

How strange it is, that with the manifest utility of the telegraph in case of fire, and the ease with which it could be adapted to that purpose—as it has now been for some years in Boston—the authorities take no steps to obtain its invaluable services. The alarm of fire can be transmitted to every district of London at the small cost of 350l. a-year. The most competent parties are ready to undertake the contract; but it is too large a sum for a poor little village, with only 2,500,000 of inhabitants, and not losing more than 500,000l. annually by fires, to expend. The sums spent at St. Stephen's in giving old gentlemen colds, and in making those of all ages sneeze from underfoot snuff—in other words, the attempt at ventilation, which is totally useless—has cost the country more than would be necessary to supply this vast metropolis with telegraphic wire communication for a century.

How strange it is that, despite the clear benefits of the telegraph for fire situations and the ease of adapting it for that purpose—as it's been done in Boston for several years—the authorities aren’t taking any steps to utilize this invaluable service. The fire alarm could be sent to every district in London at a modest cost of £350 a year. The most qualified parties are ready to take on the contract, but it’s too large a sum for a small village, with only 2,500,000 residents, losing just over £500,000 each year due to fires, to spend. The money wasted in Parliament on giving old men colds and making people of all ages sneeze from the floor snuff—essentially, the pointless attempt at ventilation—has cost the country more than enough to provide this huge city with telegraphic communication for a century.

In conclusion, I must state that in this country several establishments and individuals have their own private telegraphs, in a similar manner to that referred to at New York, and many more would do the same, did not vested interests interfere.

In conclusion, I have to say that in this country, several businesses and individuals use their own private telegraphs, just like the ones mentioned in New York, and many more would do the same if it weren't for conflicting interests.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Vide observations on this subject in Chapter X.


Extract from lecture delivered by S.B. Ruggles, at New York, October, 1852.


This extract is from a lecture by S.B. Ruggles to the citizens of Rochester, October, 1849.


The neighbouring colony "whips" the Republic in canals. Vessels from 350 to 400 tons can pass the St. Lawrence and Welland Canals. Nothing above 75 tons can use the Erie Canal.


The governor of the State, in his annual message, 1854, calls attention to the fact, that the toll on the canals is rapidly decreasing, and will be seriously imperilled if steps are not taken to enlarge it.


By the Illinois and Michigan Canal the ocean lakes communicate with the Mississippi; and when the channel is made by Lake Nipissing, there will be an unbroken watercourse between New Orleans, New York, Bytown, and Quebec.


There are upwards of 5000 miles of canal in America.


Vide an able paper on railways, written by that officer and published in that valuable work, Aide Mémoire to the Military Sciences; or for fuller particulars the reader is referred to Report on the Railways of the United States, by Capt. Douglas Galton, R.N., recently issued.


This is without the expenses arising from law and parliamentary proceedings.


I believe the railway from Charleston to Savannah was entirely laid down on this plan.


Mr. Jones, in his Historical Sketch of the Electric Telegraph, makes the calculation 40l. a mile, and estimates that, to erect them durably, would cost 100l. a mile.


Having alluded in the text to the systems of Morse, Bain, and House, I must apologize for omitting to add, that the system of Cook and Wheatstone consists simply of a deflecting needle—or needles—which being acted upon by the currents, are, according to the manipulations of the operator, made to indicate the required letters by a certain number of ticks to the right or left.



CHAPTER XXIV.


America's Press and England's Censor.



In treating of a free country, the Press must ever be considered as occupying too important an influence to be passed over in silence. I therefore propose dedicating a few pages to the subject. The following Table, arranged from information given in the Census Report of 1850, is the latest account within my reach:—

In discussing a free country, the Press must always be seen as having too much influence to be ignored. So, I plan to dedicate a few pages to this topic. The following Table, based on information from the Census Report of 1850, is the most recent account I have access to:—

Newspapers Published.

Newspapers Released.

    Daily         Tri-Weekly     Semi-Weekly      Weekly
    254             115             31             1902

    Printed        Printed        Printed         Printed
    Annually       Annually       Annually        Annually
    235,119,966   11,811,140     5,565,176       153,120,708


    Semi-Monthly       Monthly       Quarterly
        95              100             19

    Printed            Printed         Printed
    Annually           Annually        Annually
    11,703,480         8,887,803       103,500

General Classification.

Overall Ranking.

    Literary and    Neutral and     Political     Religious     Scientific  
    Miscellaneous   Independent  
        568              88             1630         191             53  

    Printed          Printed         Printed       Printed        Printed  
    Annually         Annually        Annually      Annually       Annually  
    77,877,276      88,023,953      221,844,133    33,645,484    4,893,932  

Total number of newspapers and periodicals, 2526; and copies printed annually, 426,409,978.

Total number of newspapers and magazines: 2,526; and copies printed each year: 426,409,978.

The minute accuracy of the number of copies issued annually is a piece of startling information: the Republic is most famous for statistics, but how, without any stamp to test the accuracy of the issues, they have ascertained the units while dealing with hundreds of millions is a statistical prodigy that throws the calculating genius of a Babbage and the miraculous powers of Herr Döbler and Anderson into the shade. I can therefore no more pretend to explain the method they employ for statistics, than I can the system adopted by Herr Döbler to mend plates by firing pistols at them. The exact quantity of reliance that can be placed upon them, I must leave to my reader's judgment.

The precise number of copies released each year is quite astonishing: the Republic is well-known for its statistics, but how they determine these figures without any official stamp to verify accuracy while managing hundreds of millions is a statistical marvel that makes the calculating skills of Babbage and the incredible abilities of Herr Döbler and Anderson seem insignificant. Therefore, I can’t explain the method they use for their statistics any more than I can explain Herr Döbler’s system of repairing plates by shooting at them. The actual reliability of these statistics, I leave to the judgment of my readers.

As a general rule, it may be said that the literary, religious, and scientific portions of the Press are printed on good paper, and provided with useful matter, reflecting credit on the projectors and contributors. I wish I could say the same of the political Press; but truth compels me to give a far different account of their publications: they certainly partake more of the "cheap and nasty" style. The paper is generally abominable, the type is so small as to be painful to the eyes, and would almost lead one to suppose it had been adopted at the suggestion of a conclave of 'cute oculists: the style of language in attacking adversaries is very low: the terms employed are painfully coarse, and there is a total absence of dignity; besides which they are profuse caterers to the vanity of the nation. I do not say there are no exceptions; I merely speak generally, and as they came under my own eye, while travelling through the whole length of the States. At the same time, in justice, it must be stated, that they contain a great deal of commercial information for the very small price they cost, some of them being as low as one halfpenny in price.

As a general rule, I can say that the literary, religious, and scientific sections of the press are printed on good paper and include useful content that reflects well on the creators and contributors. I wish I could say the same about the political press; however, the truth compels me to describe their publications very differently: they definitely lean more toward the "cheap and nasty" style. The paper quality is usually terrible, the print is so small that it hurts the eyes, and it almost seems like it was chosen at the suggestion of a group of clever eye doctors. The language used to attack opponents is very lowbrow; the terms are painfully crude, and there’s a complete lack of dignity. Additionally, they frequently cater to the nation's vanity. I’m not saying there aren’t any exceptions; I’m just speaking generally, based on what I observed while traveling across the States. At the same time, to be fair, I should mention that they do provide a lot of commercial information for the very low prices they charge, with some costing as little as half a penny.

I do not endorse the following extract, nor do I give it as the opinion which editors entertain generally of each other, but rather to show the language in which adverse opinions are expressed. It is taken from the columns of the The Liberator:—"We have been in the editorial harness for more than a quarter of a century, and, during that period, have had every facility to ascertain the character of the American Press, in regard to every form that has struggled for the ascendency during that period; and we soberly aver, as our conviction, that a majority of the proprietors and editors of public journals more justly deserve a place in the penitentiaries of the land than the inmates of those places generally. No felons are more lost to shame, no liars are so unscrupulous, no calumniators are so malignant and satanic."—The language of the foregoing is doubtless unmistakeably clear, but I think the style can hardly be thought defensible. On general topics of interest, if nothing occurs to stir the writer's bile, or if the theme be not calculated to excite the vanity of their countrymen, the language usually employed is perhaps a little metaphorical, but is at the same time grammatical and sufficiently clear; and, I believe, that as a general principle they expend liberally for information, and consequently the whole Republic may be said to be kept well informed on all passing events of interest.

I do not support the following excerpt, nor do I present it as the general opinion that editors have of one another, but rather to illustrate the way negative opinions are voiced. It is taken from the columns of The Liberator:—"We have been in the editorial game for over twenty-five years, and during that time, we've had every opportunity to understand the American Press's character regarding every movement that has fought for prominence during that time; and we honestly believe, as our conviction, that most of the owners and editors of public journals deserve a spot in the penitentiaries of this country more than the usual inmates. No criminals are more devoid of shame, no liars are so ruthless, and no slanderers are as vicious and evil."—The language in the excerpt is undoubtedly clear, but I think the style is hard to defend. On general topics of interest, if nothing ignites the writer's anger, or if the subject is not likely to inflate their countrymen's pride, the language used is often somewhat metaphorical, yet still grammatical and quite clear; and I believe that as a general rule, they invest significantly in information, so the entire Republic can be said to be well-informed about all current events of interest.

If we turn for a moment from considering the American Press, to take a slight glimpse at our own, how startling does the difference appear! Great Britain, Ireland, and the Channel Islands, with a population exceeding that of the United States, and with wealth immeasurably greater, produce 624 papers, and of these comparatively few are daily; only 180 issue above 100,000 copies annually, only 32 circulate above 500,000, and only 12 above 1,000,000. It has further been stated, that there are 75 towns returning 115 members, and representing 1,500,000 of the population, without any local paper at all.

If we take a moment to shift our focus from the American Press to our own, the difference is quite surprising! Great Britain, Ireland, and the Channel Islands, with a population larger than that of the United States and significantly greater wealth, produce 624 newspapers, and relatively few of these are published daily; only 180 print more than 100,000 copies each year, just 32 circulate over 500,000, and only 12 exceed 1,000,000. Additionally, it's been reported that there are 75 towns with 115 representatives, accounting for 1,500,000 people, that don't have any local newspaper at all.

The information respecting the Press in England is derived from The Sixth Annual Report of the Association for promoting the Repeal of the Taxes on Knowledge, and The Newspaper Press Directory. The issues subjoined are taken from the Return ordered by the House of Commons, of newspaper stamps, which is "A Return of the Number of Newspaper Stamps at one penny, issued to Newspapers in England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland, for the year 1854."

The information about the Press in England comes from The Sixth Annual Report of the Association for Promoting the Repeal of the Taxes on Knowledge and The Newspaper Press Directory. The listed issues are taken from the report ordered by the House of Commons on newspaper stamps, which is "A Return of the Number of Newspaper Stamps at one penny, issued to Newspapers in England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland, for the year 1854."

In England.

In the UK.

    The Times                  15,975,739  
    The News of the World       5,673,525  
    Illustrated London News     5,627,866  
    Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper    5,572,897  
    Weekly Times                3,902,169  
    Reynold's Weekly            2,496,256  
    Morning Advertiser          2,392,780  
    Weekly Dispatch             1,982,933  
    Daily News                  1,485,099  
    Bell's Life in London       1,161,000  
    Morning Herald              1,159,000  
    Manchester Guardian         1,066,575  
    Liverpool Mercury             912,000  
    Morning Chronicle             873,500  
    The Globe                     850,000  
    The Express                   841,342  
    Morning Post                  832,500  
    The Sun                       825,000  
    Evening Mail                  800,000  
    Leeds Mercury                 735,500  
    Stamford Mercury              689,000  
    Birmingham Journal            650,750  
    Shipping Gazette              628,000  
    Weekly Messenger              625,500  

In Scotland.

In Scotland.

    North British Advertiser      802,000  
    Glasgow Saturday Post         727,000  
    North British Mail            565,000  
    Glasgow Herald                541,000  

In Ireland.

In Ireland.

    The Telegraph                 959,000  
    Saunders's News Letter        756,000  
    Daily Express                 748,000  
    General Advertiser            598,000  

Various reasons may be given for this great difference between the Press of the two countries. Many are disposed to attribute it, very naturally, to the Government stamp, and the securities which are required; some, to the machinery of Government of this country being necessarily so complicated by ancient rights and privileges, and the difficulties of raising a revenue, whereof the item of interest on the national debt alone amounts to nearly 30,000,000l.; while others, again planting one foot of the Press compass in London, show that a half circle with a radius of five hundred miles brings nearly the whole community within twenty-four hours' post of the metropolis, in which the best information and the most able writers are to be found, thereby rendering it questionable if local papers, in any numbers, would obtain sufficient circulation to enable the editors to retain the services of men of talent, or to procure valuable general information, without wholesale plagiarism from their giant metropolitan rivals. Besides, it must he remembered that in America, each State, being independent, requires a separate press of its own, while the union of all the States renders it necessary that the proceedings in each of the others should be known, in order that the constitutional limits within which they are permitted to exercise their independence, may be constantly and jealously watched; from which cause it will be seen that there is a very simple reason for the Republic requiring comparatively far more papers than this country, though by no means accounting for the very great disproportion existing.

Various reasons can explain the significant difference between the press in the two countries. Many people attribute it, quite understandably, to the government regulations and the securities that are required; some point to the fact that the government machinery here is complicated by old rights and privileges, along with the challenges of raising revenue, of which the interest on the national debt alone is nearly £30,000,000. Others, with one foot in London, argue that a half-circle with a radius of five hundred miles brings almost the entire population within a twenty-four-hour mail reach of the capital, where the best information and most talented writers are available. This raises questions about whether local papers can achieve enough circulation to keep skilled editors or secure valuable general information without resorting to extensive plagiarism from their large metropolitan competitors. Additionally, it's important to note that in America, each state operates independently and needs its own press, while the union of all states means that the activities of each must be understood to ensure that the constitutional boundaries of their independence are constantly and carefully monitored. Therefore, there's a straightforward reason why the Republic needs significantly more newspapers than this country, although this doesn’t fully explain the large disparity that exists.

While, however, I readily admit that the newspapers of Great Britain are greatly inferior in numbers, I am bound in justice to add, that they are decidedly superior in tone and character. I am not defending the wholesale manner in which, when it suits their purpose, they drag an unfortunate individual before the public, and crucify him on the anonymous editorial WE, which is at one and the same time their deadliest weapon and their surest shield. Such acts all honest men must alike deplore and condemn; but it must be admitted that the language they employ is more in accordance with the courtesies of civilized life, than that used by the Press of the Republic under similar circumstances; and if, in a time of excitement and hope, they do sometimes cater for the vanity of John Bull, they more generally employ their powers to "take him down a peg;" and every newspaper which has sought for popularity in the muddy waters of scurrility, has—to use an Oriental proverb—"eaten its own dirt, and died a putrid death."

While I admit that the newspapers in Great Britain are significantly fewer in number, I must fairly say that they are definitely better in tone and character. I’m not defending the way they sometimes drag an unfortunate individual into the spotlight and tear them apart under the anonymous editorial "WE," which is both their most dangerous weapon and their best defense. All honest individuals must decry and condemn such actions; however, it must be acknowledged that the language they use is more consistent with the etiquette of civilized life than that of the Press in the Republic under similar circumstances. And while they may occasionally play to the vanity of John Bull during times of excitement and hope, they more often use their influence to "bring him down a peg." Every newspaper that has chased popularity in the murky waters of scandal has— to use an Oriental proverb— "eaten its own dirt and died a putrid death."

Let me now turn from the Press to the literature of the United States. Of the higher order of publications, it is needless to say anything in these pages. Irving, Prescott, Ticknor, Stephens, Longfellow, Hawthorne, and writers of that stamp, are an honour to any country, and are as well known in England as they are in America, consequently any encomium from my pen is as unnecessary as it would be presumptuous.

Let me now shift from the press to the literature of the United States. There's no need to say much about the higher-quality publications here. Irving, Prescott, Ticknor, Stephens, Longfellow, Hawthorne, and writers of that caliber are a source of pride for any country, and they are just as well known in England as they are in America, so any praise from me would be both unnecessary and presumptuous.

The literature on which I propose to comment, is that which I may reasonably presume to be the popular literature of the masses, because it is the staple commodity for sale on all railways and steamboats. I need not refer again to the most objectionable works, inasmuch as the very fact of their being sold by stealth proves that, however numerous their purchasers, they are at all events an outrage on public opinion. I made a point of always purchasing whatever books appeared to me to be selling most freely among my fellow-travellers, and I am sorry to say that the mass of trash I thus became possessed of was perfectly inconceivable, and the most vulgar abuse of this country was decidedly at a premium. But their language was of itself so penny-a-liny, that they might have lain for weeks on the book-shelf at an ordinary railway-station in England—price, gratis—and nobody but a trunkmaker or a grocer would have been at the trouble of removing them.

The literature I want to discuss is what I can reasonably assume to be popular among the masses, as it's the main merchandise sold on all trains and boats. I don't need to mention the most objectionable works again, since the fact that they’re sold discreetly shows that, despite their many buyers, they are definitely not in line with public opinion. I made a point of always buying whatever books seemed to be flying off the shelves among my fellow travelers, and I’m sorry to say that the amount of garbage I ended up with was unimaginable, with the most vulgar criticism of this country definitely in demand. But the language was so cheap that they could have sat on a bookstore shelf at a regular railway station in England—price, free—and no one but a trunkmaker or a grocer would bother to take them away.

Not content, however, with writing trash, they do not scruple to deceive the public in the most barefaced way by deliberate falsehood. I have in my possession two of these specimens of honesty, purchased solely from seeing my brother's name as the author, which of course I knew perfectly well to be false, and which they doubtless put there because the American public had received favourably the volumes he really had written. Of the contents of these works attributed to him I will only say, the rubbish was worthy of the robber. I would not convey the idea that all the books offered for sale are of this calibre; there are also magazines and other works, some of which are both interesting and well-written. If I found no quick sale going on, I generally selected some work treating of either England or the English, so as to ascertain the popular shape in which my countrymen were represented.

Not satisfied with just writing junk, they don't hesitate to mislead the public in the most shameless way by outright lies. I have two examples of this fake honesty, bought just because I saw my brother’s name as the author, which I knew was completely false. They probably put it there because the American public had responded well to the actual books he wrote. As for the content of these works credited to him, I can only say the trash was fitting for a thief. I wouldn’t suggest that all the books sold are like this; there are also magazines and other works, some of which are both interesting and well-written. If I didn't see a quick sale happening, I usually picked something about England or the English to see how my countrymen were being portrayed.

One work which I got hold of, called Northwood, amused me much: I there found the Englishman living under a belief that the Americans were little better than savages and Pagans, and quite overcome at the extraordinary scene of a household meeting together for domestic worship, which of course was never heard of in England. This little scene affords a charming opportunity for "buttering up" New England piety at the cheap expense of a libel upon the old country. He then is taken to hear a sermon, where for his special benefit, I suppose, the preacher expatiates on the glorious field of Bunker's Hill, foretells England's decline, and generously promises our countrymen a home in America when they are quite "used up." The Englishman is quite overcome with the eloquence and sympathy of the Church militant preacher, whose discourse being composed by the authoress, I may fairly conclude is given as a model of New England oratory in her estimation. Justice requires I should add, that the sermons I heard during my stay in those States were on religious topics, and not on revolutionary war.

One book I came across, called Northwood, really entertained me: I found the Englishman believing that Americans were hardly better than savages and heathens, utterly amazed by the unusual sight of a family gathering for home worship, which, of course, was unheard of in England. This little scene provides a great chance to praise New England's piety at the expense of slandering the old country. He then goes to hear a sermon where, just for him, I guess, the preacher goes on about the glorious Battle of Bunker Hill, predicts England's decline, and generously offers our countrymen a place in America when they're all worn out. The Englishman is thoroughly impressed by the preacher's passion and compassion from the Church militant, whose speech, being crafted by the author, I can reasonably assume is presented as a model of New England oratory in her view. I should note that the sermons I heard during my time in those States were about religious topics, not about the revolutionary war.

Perhaps it may be said that Northwood was written some years ago, I will therefore pass from it to what at the present day appears to be considered a chef d'oeuvre among the popular style of works of which I have been speaking. I ground my opinion of the high estimation in which it is held from the flattering encomiums passed upon it by the Press throughout the whole Republic from Boston to New Orleans. Boston styles it a "vigorous volume;" Philadelphia, a "delightful treat;" New York, "interesting and instructive;" Albany admires the Author's "keen discriminating powers;" Detroit, "a lively and racy style;" The Christian Advocate styles it "a skinning operation" and then adds, it is a "retort courteous" to Uncle Tommyism; Rochester honours the author with the appellation of "the most chivalrous American that ever crossed the Atlantic." New Orleans winds up a long paragraph with the following magnificent burst of editorial eloquence:—"The work is essentially American. It is the type, the representative, THE AGGREGATE OUTBURST OF THE GREAT AMERICAN HEART, so well expressed, so admirably revealing the sentiment of our whole peoplewith the exception of some puling lovers he speaks of-that it will find sympathy in the mind of every true son of the soil." The work thus heralded over the Republic with such perfect e pluribus unum concord is entitled English Items; and the embodiment of the "aggregate outburst of the great American heart" is a Mr. Matthew F. Ward, whose work is sent forth to the public from one of the most respectable publishers in New York—D. Appleton and Co., Broadway.

Maybe it can be said that Northwood was written some years ago, so I'll move on to what is currently considered a masterpiece among the popular works I've mentioned. I base my opinion on the high regard it's held in due to the flattering reviews from the Press all across the country, from Boston to New Orleans. Boston calls it a "powerful book;" Philadelphia, a "charming read;" New York, "engaging and educational;" Albany praises the Author's "sharp discerning abilities;" Detroit, "a vibrant and spirited style;" The Christian Advocate refers to it as "a clever comeback" and adds that it's a "polite rebuttal" to Uncle Tommyism; Rochester honors the author with the title of "the most gallant American ever to cross the Atlantic." New Orleans concludes a lengthy paragraph with this impressive burst of editorial flair:—"The work is fundamentally American. It is the type, the representative, THE COLLECTIVE EXPRESSION OF THE GREAT AMERICAN HEART, so well conveyed, so expertly reflecting the sentiment of our entire populationaside from a few whiny lovers he mentions—that it will resonate with every true son of the land." The work celebrated across the country with such harmonious e pluribus unum consensus is titled English Items; and the embodiment of the "collective expression of the great American heart" is a Mr. Matthew F. Ward, whose work is published by one of the most reputable publishers in New York—D. Appleton and Co., Broadway.

Before I present the reader specimens of ore from this valuable mine I must make a few observations. The author is the son of one of the wealthiest families in Kentucky, a man of education and travel, and has appeared before the public in a work entitled The Three Continents: I have given extracts from the opinions of the Press at greater length than I otherwise should have done, because I think after the reader has followed me through a short review of English Items, he will see what strong internal testimony they bear to the truth of my previous observations. I would also remark that I am not at all thin-skinned as to travellers giving vent to their true feelings with regard to my own country. All countries have their weaknesses, their follies, and their wickednesses. Public opinion in England, taken as a whole, is decidedly good, and therefore the more the wrong is laid bare the more hope for its correction; but, while admitting this right in its fullest extent, it is under two conditions: one that the author speak the truth, the other that his language be not an outrage on decency or good manners. Now then, come forth, thou aggregate outburst of the great American heart![BJ] Speak for thyself—let the public be thy judge.

Before I share samples of ore from this valuable mine, I need to make a few comments. The author is the son of one of the wealthiest families in Kentucky, well-educated and well-traveled, and has made a name for himself with a work titled The Three Continents: I have included longer excerpts from the opinions of the press than I usually would because I believe that after the reader reviews English Items, they will see how strongly these opinions support my earlier observations. I’d also like to point out that I’m not at all sensitive about travelers expressing their true feelings about my country. Every country has its flaws, its foolishness, and its vices. Overall, public opinion in England is largely positive, and therefore, the more we expose what's wrong, the more hope there is for change; however, while I acknowledge this right completely, it comes with two conditions: first, the author must speak the truth, and second, their language should not be an affront to decency or good manners. So, now, come forth, thou aggregate outburst of the great American heart![BJ] Speak for yourself—let the public be your judge.

The following extracts are from the chapter on "Our Individual Relations with England," the chaste style whereof must gratify the reader:—"I am sorry to observe that it is becoming more and more the fashion, especially among travelled Americans, to pet the British beast; ... instead of treating him like other refractory brutes, they pusillanimously strive to soothe him by a forbearance he cannot appreciate; ... beasts are ruled through fear, not kindness: they submissively lick the hand that wields the lash." Then follow instructions for his treatment, so terrible as to make future tourists to America tremble:—"Seize him fearlessly by the throat, and once strangle him into involuntary silence, and the British lion will hereafter be as fawning as he has been hitherto spiteful." He then informs his countrymen that the English "cannot appreciate the retiring nature of true gentility ... nor can they realize how a nation can fail to be blustering except from cowardice." Towards the conclusion of the chapter he explains that "hard blows are the only logic the English understand;" and then, lest the important fact should be forgotten, he clothes the sentiment in the following burst of genuine American eloquence:—"To affect their understandings, we must punch their heads." So much for the chapter on "Our Individual Relations with England," which promise to be of so friendly a nature that future travellers had better take with them a supply of bandages, lint, and diachylon plaster, so as to be ready for the new genuine American process of intellectual expansion.

The following extracts are from the chapter on "Our Individual Relations with England," the clear style of which is sure to please the reader:—"I regret to note that it's becoming increasingly common, especially among well-traveled Americans, to indulge the British; ... instead of treating him like other stubborn beasts, they cowardly try to calm him with a patience he can't understand; ... beasts are controlled through fear, not kindness: they submissively lick the hand that holds the whip." Then come instructions for dealing with him, so harsh that future tourists to America might shudder:—"Grab him boldly by the throat, and once silence him completely, and the British lion will thereafter be as affectionate as he once was spiteful." He then informs his fellow countrymen that the English "cannot appreciate the modest nature of true gentility ... nor can they fathom how a nation might not be aggressive except out of fear." Toward the end of the chapter, he clarifies that "hard blows are the only logic the English understand;" and then, to ensure the crucial point isn't forgotten, he expresses the sentiment in the following burst of genuine American eloquence:—"To change their minds, we must hit them." So much for the chapter on "Our Individual Relations with England," which promises to be so friendly that future travelers should definitely bring along a stock of bandages, lint, and adhesive plaster, so they are prepared for the new genuine American method of intellectual expansion.

Another chapter is dedicated to "Sixpenny Miracles in England," which is chiefly composed of réchauffées from our own press, and with which the reader is probably familiar; but there are some passages sufficiently amusing for quotation:—"English officials are invariably impertinent, from the policeman at the corner to the minister in Downing-street ... a stranger might suppose them paid to insult, rather than to oblige ... from the clerk at the railway depôt to the secretary of the office where a man is compelled to go about passports, the same laconic rudeness is observable." How the American mind must have been galled, when a cabinet minister said, "not at home" to a free and enlightened citizen, who, on a levee day at the White House, can follow his own hackney-coachman into the august presence of the President elect. Conceive him strolling up Charing Cross, then suddenly stopping in the middle of the pavement, wrapt in thought as to whether he should cowhide the insulting minister, or give him a chance at twenty yards with a revolving carbine. Ere the knotty point is settled in his mind, a voice from beneath a hat with an oilskin top sounds in his ear, "Move on, sir, don't stop the pathway!" Imagine the sensations of a sovereign citizen of a sovereign state, being subject to such indignities from stipendiary ministers and paid police. Who can wonder that he conceives it the duty of government so to regulate public offices, &c., "as to protect not only its own subjects, but strangers, from the insults of these impertinent hirelings." The bile of the author rises with his subject, and a few pages further on he throws it off in the following beautiful sentence:—"Better would it be for the honour of the English nation if they had been born in the degradation, as they are endued with the propensities, of the modern Egyptians."

Another chapter is devoted to "Sixpenny Miracles in England," which mainly consists of rehashed material from our own press that the reader is likely familiar with; however, there are some passages amusing enough to quote:—“English officials are consistently rude, from the policeman on the corner to the minister in Downing Street... a stranger might think they're paid to insult rather than to assist... from the clerk at the train station to the secretary at the office where a person must go for passports, the same blunt rudeness is noticeable.” How the American mind must have been offended when a cabinet minister simply said, “not at home” to a free and enlightened citizen, who, on a levee day at the White House, can follow his own taxi driver straight into the exalted presence of the elected President. Imagine him walking along Charing Cross, suddenly stopping in the middle of the sidewalk, lost in thought about whether to lash the impudent minister or give him a shot at twenty yards with a revolver. Before he resolves this dilemma in his mind, a voice from under a rainproof hat interrupts him, saying, “Move on, sir, don’t block the path!” Picture the feelings of a sovereign citizen of a sovereign state, being subjected to such insults from government-paid officials and police. Who could blame him for believing that it’s the government's duty to manage public offices, etc., “to protect not only its own citizens, but also strangers, from the insults of these rude workers.” The author’s frustration escalates with his topic, and a few pages later, he expresses it beautifully in this sentence:—“It would be better for the dignity of the English nation if they had been born into the humiliation, as they are endowed with the tendencies, of the modern Egyptians.”

At last, among other "sixpenny miracles," he arrives at the Zoological Gardens,—the beauty of arrangement, the grandness of the scale, &c., strike him forcibly; but his keen inquiring mind, and his accurately recording pen, have enabled him to afford his countrymen information which most of my co-members in the said Society were previously unconscious of. He tells them, "It is under control of the English Government, and subject to the same degradation as Westminster, St. Paul's, &c."—Starting from this basis, which only wants truth to make it solid, he complains of "the meanness of reducing the nation to the condition of a common showman;" the trifling mistake of confounding public and private property moves his democratic chivalry, and he takes up the cudgels for the masses. I almost fear to give the sentence publicity, lest it should shake the Ministry, and be a rallying-point for Filibustero Chartists. My anticipation of but a moderate circulation for this work must plead my excuse for not withholding it. "The Government basely use, without permission, the authority of the people's name, to make them sharers in a disgrace for which they alone are responsible. A stranger, in paying his shilling for admission into an exhibition, which has been dubbed nation (by whom?) in contradistinction from another in the Surrey Gardens, very naturally suspects that the people are partners in this contemptible transaction.... The English people are compelled to pay for the ignominy with which their despotic rulers have loaded them." Having got his foot into this mare's nest, he finds an egg a little further on, which he thus hatches for the American public: "Englishmen not only regard eating as the most inestimable blessing of life, when they enjoy it themselves, but they are always intensely delighted to see it going on. The Government charge an extra shilling at the Zoological Gardens on the days that the animals are fed in public; but, as much as an Englishman dislikes spending money, the extraordinary attraction never fails to draw," &c.

At last, among other "sixpenny miracles," he arrives at the Zoological Gardens. The way it’s arranged and its impressive scale really grab his attention; however, his sharp, inquisitive mind and accurate note-taking have allowed him to provide his fellow countrymen with insights that most of my colleagues in the Society were previously unaware of. He informs them, "It is under the control of the English Government and subjected to the same degradation as Westminster, St. Paul's, etc." Based on this premise, which needs only the truth to make it solid, he complains about "the meanness of reducing the nation to the status of a common showman." The slight error of confusing public and private property stirs his democratic chivalry, and he takes up the fight for the masses. I almost hesitate to make this sentence public for fear it will unsettle the Ministry and become a rallying cry for radical Chartists. My expectation of only moderate circulation for this work serves as my excuse for sharing it. "The Government shamelessly exploits, without permission, the authority of the people's name to make them share in a disgrace for which they alone are responsible. A stranger, paying his shilling for entry into an exhibition that has been called national (by whom?) in contrast to another in the Surrey Gardens, naturally suspects that the people are complicit in this disgraceful affair.... The English people are forced to pay for the shame their oppressive rulers have burdened them with." After stumbling into this mess, he discovers something else worth sharing with the American public: "Englishmen not only see eating as the greatest blessing in life when they enjoy it themselves, but they also take immense pleasure in watching it happen. The Government charges an extra shilling at the Zoological Gardens on the days when animals are fed publicly; but despite how much an Englishman dislikes spending money, the extraordinary attraction never fails to draw," etc.

From the Gardens he visits Chelsea Hospital, where his keen discriminating powers having been sharpened by the demand for a shilling—the chief object of which demand is to protect the pensioners from perpetual intrusion—he bursts forth in a sublime magnifico Kentuckyo flight of eloquence: "Sordid barbarians might degrade the wonderful monuments of their more civilized ancestors by charging visitors to see them; but to drag from their lowly retreat these maimed and shattered victims of national ambition, to be stared at, and wondered at, like caged beasts, is an outrage against humanity that even savages would shrink from." And then, a little further on, he makes the following profound reflection, which no doubt appears to the American mind peculiarly appropriate to Chelsea Hospital: "Cringing to the great, obsequious to the high, the dwarfed souls of Englishmen have no wide extending sympathy for the humble, no soothing pity for the lowly," &c. It would probably astonish some of the readers who have been gulled by his book, could they but know that the sum paid by Great Britain for the support and pension of her veterans by sea and land costs annually nearly enough to buy, equip, and pay the whole army and navy of the United States.[BK]

From the Gardens, he goes to Chelsea Hospital, where his sharp discriminating abilities have been honed by the need for a shilling—the main purpose of this fee is to protect the pensioners from constant intrusion—he bursts out in a grand, Kentucky-style flow of speech: "Sordid barbarians might ruin the incredible monuments of their more civilized ancestors by charging visitors to see them; but to drag from their humble retreat these maimed and shattered victims of national ambition, to be stared at and gawked at like caged animals, is an outrage against humanity that even savages would avoid." And then, a little later, he shares the following profound thought, which likely seems to the American mind particularly fitting for Chelsea Hospital: "Subservient to the powerful, servile to the rich, the small-minded souls of Englishmen have no broad sympathy for the humble, no comforting pity for the lowly," & etc. It would probably surprise some of the readers who have been misled by his book, if they only knew that the amount paid by Great Britain for the support and pension of her veterans at sea and on land costs nearly enough each year to buy, equip, and pay for the entire army and navy of the United States.[BK]

The next "sixpenny miracle" he visits is Chatsworth, which calls forth the following vigorous attack on sundry gentlemen, clothed in the author's peculiarly lively and racy language: "The showy magnificence of Chatsworth, Blenheim, and the gloomy grandeur of Warwick and Alnwick Castles, serve to remind us, like the glittering shell of the tortoise, what worthless and insignificant animals often inhabit the most splendid mansions." He follows up this general castigation of the owners of the above properties with the infliction of a special cowhiding upon the Duke of Devonshire, who, he says, "would, no doubt, be very reluctant frankly to confess to the world, that although he had the vanity to affect liberality, he was too penurious to bear the expense of it. Like the ostrich, he sticks his head in the sand, and imagines himself in the profoundest concealment." He then begs the reader to understand, that he does not mean to intimate "that any portion of the large amounts collected at the doors of Chatsworth actually goes into the pocket of His Grace, but they are, nevertheless, remarkably convenient in defraying the expense of a large household of servants.... The idea of a private gentleman of wealth and rank deriving a profit from the exhibition of his grounds must be equally revolting to all classes." These truthful observations are followed by a description of the gardens; and the whole is wound up in the following chivalrous and genuine American reflection: "Does it not appear extraordinary that a man dwelling in a spot of such fairy loveliness should retain and indulge the most grovelling instincts of human nature's lowest grade?" What a delightful treat these passages must be to the rowdy Americans, and how the Duke must writhe under—what The Christian Advocate lauds as—the skinning operation of the renowned American champion![BL]

The next "sixpenny miracle" he visits is Chatsworth, which prompts the following strong critique of certain gentlemen, expressed in the author’s uniquely vivid and bold style: "The flashy grandeur of Chatsworth, Blenheim, and the somber magnificence of Warwick and Alnwick Castles remind us, like the shiny shell of a tortoise, that often the most impressive mansions are inhabited by the most insignificant creatures." He follows this general condemnation of the owners of these estates with a particular scolding of the Duke of Devonshire, who, he says, "would, no doubt, be very reluctant to openly admit that even though he pretends to be generous, he's too stingy to actually spend any money. Like an ostrich, he buries his head in the sand, thinking he’s in the deepest concealment." He then asks the reader to understand that he doesn’t mean to suggest "that any of the large sums collected at the gates of Chatsworth go directly into His Grace’s pockets, but they do help cover the costs of a large staff of servants.... The idea of a wealthy gentleman profiting from showing off his grounds must be appalling to everyone." These candid remarks are followed by a description of the gardens; and it all concludes with a chivalrous and sincere American reflection: "Isn’t it strange that someone living in such a beautiful place could indulge in the most base instincts of human nature?" What a delightful treat these passages must be for the rowdy Americans, and how the Duke must squirm under—what The Christian Advocate praises as—the exposure by the famous American champion![BL]

The Press-bespattered author then proceeds to make some observations on various subjects, in a similar vein of chaste language, lighting at last upon the system of the sale of army commissions. His vigour is so great upon this point, that had he only been in the House of Commons when the subject was under consideration, his eloquence must have hurled the "hireling ministers" headlong from the government. I can fancy them sitting pale and trembling as the giant orator thus addressed the House: "She speculates in glory as a petty hucksterer does in rancid cheese; but the many who hate, and the few who despise England, cannot exult over her baseness in selling commissions in her own army. There is a degree of degradation which changes scorn into pity, and makes us sincerely sympathize with those whom we most heartily despise." The annexed extract from his observations on English writers on America is an equally elegant specimen of genuine American feeling:—"When the ability to calumniate is the only power which has survived the gradual encroachment of bowels upon intellect in Great Britain, it would be a pity to rob the English even of this miserable evidence of mind ... she gloats over us with that sort of appetizing tenderness which might be supposed to have animated a sow that had eaten her nine farrow." The subjoined sentiment, if it rested with the author to verify, would doubtless be true; and I suppose it is the paragraph which earned for his work the laudations of The Christian Advocate:—"Mutual enmity is the only feeling which can ever exist between the two nations.... She gave us no assistance in our rise.... She must expect none from us in her decline." How frightful is the contemplation of this omnipotent and Christian threat! It is worthy of the consideration of my countrymen whether they had not better try and bribe the great Matt. Ward to use his influence in obtaining them recognition as American territory. The honour of being admitted as a sovereign state is too great to be hoped for. He has already discovered signs of our decay, and therefore informs the reader that "the weaker rival ever nurses the bitterest hate." This information is followed by extracts from various English writers commenting upon America, at one of whom he gets so indignant, that he suggests as an appropriate American translation of the F.R.S. which is added to the author's name, "First Royal Scavenger."

The pressed author goes on to share his thoughts on different topics, using a similarly straightforward style, and eventually lands on the issue of selling army commissions. He’s so passionate about this that if he had been in the House of Commons when it was discussed, his speech would have knocked those "hired ministers" out of power. I can picture them sitting there, pale and nervous as the powerful speaker addressed the House: "She treats glory like a small-time vendor treats spoiled cheese; but those who hate, and the few who look down on England, can't take pride in her disgrace of selling commissions in her own army. There’s a level of shame that turns contempt into pity, leading us to genuinely feel for those we most disdain." The following quote from his thoughts on English writers about America is another fine example of genuine American feeling:—"When the only talent left in Great Britain is the ability to slander, it’s a pity to take even this pathetic sign of intellect away from them ... she looks at us with a sort of hungry affection that might be expected from a sow that has just eaten her own nine piglets." The sentiment expressed here, if it were up to the author to prove, would definitely be true; and I think it’s the paragraph that earned his work praise from The Christian Advocate:—"Mutual hatred is the only feeling that can exist between the two nations.... She didn’t help us rise.... She shouldn’t expect any support from us as she falls." How terrifying it is to consider this overwhelming and Christian threat! My fellow countrymen should think about whether they should try to persuade the great Matt. Ward to use his influence to get us recognized as American territory. The honor of being accepted as a sovereign state is too much to hope for. He has already noticed signs of our decline, so he informs the reader that "the weaker rival always harbors the deepest resentment." This information is followed by excerpts from several English writers commenting on America, and one of them gets him so worked up that he suggests an appropriate American translation of the F.R.S. that is attached to the author's name: "First Royal Scavenger."

He then gets into a fever about the remarks made by travellers upon what they conceive to be the filthy practice of indiscriminate spitting. He becomes quite furious because he has never found any work in which "an upstart inlander has ever preached a crusade against the Turks because they did not introduce knives and forks at their tables," &c. Even Scripture—and this, be it remembered, by the sanction of The Christian Advocate—is blasphemously quoted to extenuate the American practice of expectoration. "What, after all, is there so unbearably revolting about spitting? Our Saviour, in one of his early miracles, 'spat upon the ground and made clay of the spittle, and anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay. And he said unto him, Go wash in the pool of Siloam. He went his way therefore and washed, and came seeing.' I have with a crowd of pilgrims gone down to drink from this very pool, for the water had borrowed new virtue from the miracle." He then states his strong inclination to learn to chew tobacco in order to show his contempt for the opinions of travellers. What a beautiful picture to contemplate—a popular author with a quid of Virginia before him; Nausea drawing it back with one hand, and Vengeance bringing it forward with the other! Suddenly a bright idea strikes him: others may do what he dare not; so he makes the following stirring appeal to his countrymen: "Let us spit out courageously before the whole world ... let us spit fearlessly and profusely. Spitting on ordinary occasions may be regarded by a portion of my countrymen as a luxury: it becomes a duty in the presence of an Englishman. Let us spit around him—above him—beneath him—everywhere but on him, that he may become perfectly familiar with the habit in all its phases. I would make it the first law of hospitality to an Englishman, that every tobacco-twist should be called into requisition, and every spittoon be flooded, in order thoroughly to initiate him into the mysteries of chewing. Leave no room for imagination to work. Only spit him once into a state of friendly familiarity with the barbarous custom," &c. What a splendid conception!--the population of a whole continent organized under the expectorating banner of the illustrious Matt. Ward: field-days twice a week; ammunition supplied gratis; liberal prizes to the best marksmen. The imagination is perfectly bewildered in the contemplation of so majestic an aggregate outburst of the great American mouth. I would only suggest that they should gather round the margin of Lake Superior, lest in their hospitable entertainment of the "upstart islanders" they destroyed the vegetation of the whole continent.

He then becomes obsessed with the comments made by travelers about what they see as the disgusting habit of spitting everywhere. He gets really angry because he has never come across any work where "some newcomer has ever started a campaign against the Turks for not using knives and forks at their tables," etc. Even the Bible—and this, remember, is backed by The Christian Advocate—is outrageously quoted to justify the American habit of spitting. "What, really, is so unbearably gross about spitting? Our Savior, in one of his early miracles, 'spat on the ground, made clay from the saliva, and anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay. He told him, Go wash in the pool of Siloam. So he went, washed, and came back seeing.' I have been with a group of pilgrims to drink from this very pool, since the water had gained new significance from the miracle." He then expresses a strong desire to learn to chew tobacco as a way to show his disdain for travelers' opinions. What a striking image to envision—a popular author with a wad of Virginia tobacco in his mouth; Nausea pulling it back with one hand, and Vengeance pushing it forward with the other! Suddenly, he has a brilliant idea: others can do what he can’t; so he makes this passionate appeal to his fellow countrymen: "Let us spit boldly in front of the whole world... let us spit without fear and in abundance. Spitting on regular occasions may be viewed by some of my fellow countrymen as a luxury: it becomes a duty when in the presence of an Englishman. Let us spit around him—above him—below him—everywhere but on him, so he can get completely used to the habit in all its forms. I would make it the first rule of hospitality to an Englishman that every piece of tobacco should be used, and every spittoon filled, to properly introduce him to the art of chewing. Leave no room for imagination. Just spit him into a comfortable familiarity with the barbaric custom," etc. What a fantastic idea!—the entire population of a continent united under the spitting banner of the famed Matt. Ward: field days twice a week; ammunition provided for free; generous prizes for the best spitters. One can’t help but be amazed at such a grand collective eruption from the great American mouth. I would only suggest they gather around the edge of Lake Superior, so that in their friendly hosting of the "newcomers" they don’t destroy the vegetation of the whole continent.

In another chapter he informs his countrymen that the four hundred and thirty nobles in England speak and act for the nation; his knowledge of history, or his love of truth, ignoring that little community called the House of Commons. Bankers and wealthy men come under the ban of his condemnation, as having no time for "enlightened amusements;" he then, with that truthfulness which makes him so safe a guide to his readers, adds that "they were never known to manifest a friendship, except for the warehouse cat; they have no time to talk, and never write except on business; all hours are office-hours to them, except those they devote to dinner and sleep; they know nothing, they love nothing, and hope for nothing beyond the four walls of their counting-room; nobody knows them, nobody loves them; they are too mean to make friends, and too silent to make acquaintances," &c. What very interesting information this must be for Messrs. Baring and their co-fraternity!

In another chapter, he tells his fellow countrymen that the four hundred and thirty nobles in England speak and act for the nation; his knowledge of history, or his commitment to the truth, overlooks that small group known as the House of Commons. He condemns bankers and wealthy individuals for having no interest in "enlightened amusements;" then, with the honesty that makes him such a reliable guide for his readers, he adds that "they were never known to show friendship, except for the warehouse cat; they have no time to chat and only write for business; all hours are work hours for them, except the time they spend on dinner and sleep; they know nothing, love nothing, and hope for nothing beyond the confines of their office; nobody knows them, nobody loves them; they are too petty to make friends and too reserved to form acquaintances," etc. What fascinating information this must be for Messrs. Baring and their associates!

In another part of this volume, the author becomes suddenly impressed with deep reverence for the holy localities of the East, and he falls foul of Dr. Clarke for his scepticism on these points, winding up his remarks in the following beautiful Kentucky vein:—"A monster so atrocious could only have been a Goth or an Englishman." How fortunate for his countryman, Dr. Robinson, that he had never heard of his three learned tomes on the same subject! though, perhaps, scepticism in an American, in his discriminating mind, would have been deep erudition correcting the upstart islanders. The great interest which he evinces for holy localities—accompanied as it is by an expression of horror at some English traveller, who, he asserts, thought that David picked up his pebbles in a brook between Jordan and the Dead Sea, whereas he knew it was in an opposite direction—doubtless earned for him the patronage of The Christian Advocate; and the pious indignation he expresses at an Englishman telling him he would get a good dinner at Mount Carmel, is a beautiful illustration of his religious feelings.

In another part of this book, the author suddenly feels a profound respect for the sacred places in the East, and he criticizes Dr. Clarke for his skepticism about these matters, concluding his thoughts with this striking Kentucky saying: “A monster so terrible could only have been a Goth or an Englishman.” How lucky for his fellow countryman, Dr. Robinson, that he never encountered his three scholarly volumes on the same topic! Although, perhaps skepticism from an American, in his discerning mind, would have been seen as deep knowledge correcting the arrogant islanders. The strong interest he shows in sacred places—along with his horror at an English traveler who supposedly believed David picked up his stones in a stream between Jordan and the Dead Sea, when he knew it was in the opposite direction—surely won him the support of The Christian Advocate; and the righteous indignation he shows when an Englishman tells him he could get a good meal at Mount Carmel beautifully illustrates his religious sentiments.

The curious part of this portion of Mr. Ward's book is, that having previously informed his countrymen, in every variety of American phraseology, that the English are composed of every abominable compound which can exist in human nature, he selects them as his companions, and courts their friendship to enjoy the pleasure of betraying it. Of course, if one is to judge by former statements made in the volume, which are so palpably and ridiculously false, one may reasonably conclude that truth is equally disregarded here; but it looks to me rather as if my countrymen had discovered his cloven hoof, as well as his overweening vanity and pretensions, and, when he got pompously classical, in his trip through Greece, they amused themselves at his expense by suggesting that the Acropolis "was a capital place for lunch;" Parnassus, "a regular sell;" Thermopylae, "great for water-cresses." Passing on from his companions—one of whom was a fellow of Oxford, and the other a captain in Her Majesty's service—he becomes grandly Byronic, and consequently quite frantic at the idea of Mr. A. Tennyson supplanting him! "Byron and Tennyson!--what an unholy alliance of names!--what sinful juxtaposition! He who could seriously compare the insipid effusions of Mr. Tennyson with the mighty genius of Byron, might commit the sacrilege of likening the tricks of Professor Anderson to the miracles of Our Saviour."

The interesting part of this section of Mr. Ward's book is that, after telling his fellow countrymen in all kinds of American phrases that the English are made up of every terrible trait found in human nature, he chooses them as his companions and seeks their friendship just to enjoy the thrill of betraying it. Naturally, if we judge by the previous statements made in the book, which are clearly and absurdly false, one could reasonably conclude that truth is equally ignored here; but it seems to me that my fellow countrymen have noticed his true nature, along with his excessive pride and pretensions, and when he became pompously academic on his trip through Greece, they had a laugh at his expense by suggesting that the Acropolis "was a great spot for lunch;" that Parnassus was "a total letdown;" and that Thermopylae was "awesome for watercress." Moving on from his companions—one of whom was an Oxford fellow, and the other a captain in Her Majesty's service—he gets dramatically Byronic and is quite upset at the thought of Mr. A. Tennyson taking his place! "Byron and Tennyson!—what an unholy pairing of names!—what a sinful comparison! Anyone who could seriously compare the dull writings of Mr. Tennyson with the brilliant genius of Byron might as well compare the tricks of Professor Anderson to the miracles of Our Savior."

Having delivered himself of this pious burst, he proceeds to a castigation of the English for their observations on the nasal twang of his countrymen, and also for their criticism upon the sense in which sundry adjectives are used; and, to show the superior purity of the American language, he informs the reader that in England "the most elegant and refined talk constantly of "fried 'am" ... they seem very reluctant to hacknowledge this peculiarly hexceptionable 'abit, and hinsist that hit his confined to the low and hignorant of the country." He then gets indignant that we call "stone" "stun," and measure the gravity of flesh and blood thereby. "To unsophisticated ears, 21 stone 6 pounds sounds infinitely less than three hundred pounds, which weight is a fair average of the avoirdupois density of the Sir Tunbelly Clumsies of the middle and upper classes."

After expressing his pious thoughts, he goes on to criticize the English for their comments on the nasal twang of his fellow countrymen and for their critique of how certain adjectives are used. To demonstrate the superiority of the American language, he points out that in England "the most elegant and refined people constantly talk about 'fried 'am'..." They seem very hesitant to acknowledge this particularly unpleasant habit and insist that it is only found among the low and ignorant in the country. He then gets upset that we call "stone" "stun" and measure the weight of flesh and blood accordingly. "To untrained ears, 21 stone 6 pounds sounds much less than three hundred pounds, which is a fair average weight for the Sir Tunbelly Clumsies of the middle and upper classes."

From this elegant sentence he passes on to the evils of idleness, in treating of which he supplies The Christian Advocate with the true cause of original sin. "Does any one imagine that the forbidden fruit would ever have been tasted if Adam had been daily occupied in tilling the earth, and Eve, like a good housewife, in darning fig-leaf aprons for herself and her husband? Never!" The observation would lead one to imagine that the Bible was a scarce article in Kentucky. He passes on from Adam to the banker and merchant of the present day, and informs the reader that they command a high respect in society, but it would be deemed a shocking misapplication of terms to speak of any of them as gentlemen. After which truthful statement, he enters into a long definition of a gentleman, as though he thought his countrymen totally ignorant on that point: he gets quite chivalrous in his description: "He ought to touch his hat to his opponent with whom he was about to engage in mortal combat."[BM] After which remark he communicates two pieces of information—the one as true as the other is modest: "Politeness is deemed lessening to the position of a gentleman in England; in America it is thought his proudest boast." Of course he only alludes to manner; his writings prove at every page that genuine American feeling dispenses with it in language. His politeness, I suppose, may be described in the words Junius applied to friendship:—"The insidious smile upon the cheek should warn you of the canker in the heart." By way of encouraging civility, he informs the reader that an Englishman "never appears so disgusting as when he attempts to be especially kind; ...in affecting to oblige, he becomes insulting." He confesses, however, "I have known others in America whom you would never suspect of being Englishmen—they were such good fellows; but they had been early transplanted from England. If the sound oranges be removed from a barrel in which decay has commenced, they may be saved; but if suffered to remain, they are all soon reduced to the same disgusting state."

From this polished statement, he moves on to the problems of laziness, where he provides The Christian Advocate with the real reason behind original sin. "Does anyone really think the forbidden fruit would ever have been touched if Adam had been busy farming the land every day, and Eve, like a good homemaker, was sewing fig-leaf aprons for herself and her husband? Absolutely not!" This comment might make one think that the Bible is a rare item in Kentucky. He shifts from Adam to today’s banker and merchant, noting that they are highly respected in society, but calling any of them gentlemen would be an outrageous misuse of the term. After this truthful observation, he gives a lengthy definition of a gentleman, as if he believes his fellow countrymen have no clue on the subject: he gets quite chivalrous in his description: "He should tip his hat to his opponent before engaging in mortal combat."[BM] Following this remark, he shares two pieces of information—one as accurate as the other is humble: "Politeness is considered a diminishing quality for a gentleman in England; in America, it’s seen as his greatest pride." Naturally, he only refers to manners; his writings show on every page that genuine American feeling overlooks this in language. His version of politeness, I suppose, can be summed up by Junius's words about friendship: "The sneaky smile on the face should warn you of the rot in the heart." To promote civility, he tells readers that an Englishman "never looks worse than when trying to be overly kind;... by pretending to be accommodating, he becomes insulting." He admits, however, "I have known others in America whom you would never guess were English—they were such great guys; but they had been transplanted from England early on. If the healthy oranges are taken from a barrel that's starting to rot, they can be saved; but if left in, they'll all soon become just as rotten."

His discriminating powers next penetrate some of the deep mysteries of animal nature: he discovers that the peculiarities of the bullock and the sheep have been gradually absorbed into the national character, as far as conversation is concerned. "They have not become woolly, nor do they wear horns, but the nobility are eternally bellowing forth the astounding deeds of their ancestors, whilst the muttonish middle classes bleat a timorous approval.... Such subjects constitute their fund of amusing small talk," &c. From the foregoing elegant description of conversation, he passes onwards to the subject of gentility, and describes a young honourable, on board a steamer, who refused to shut a window when asked by a sick and suffering lady, telling the husband, "he could not consent to be suffocated though his wife was sick." And having cooked up the story, he gives the following charming reason for his conduct: "He dreaded the possibility of compromising his own position and that of his noble family at home by obliging an ordinary person." He afterwards touches upon English visitors to America, who, he says, "generally come among us in the undisguised nakedness of their vulgarity. Wholly freed from the restraints imposed upon them at home by the different grades in society, they indolently luxuriate in the inherent brutality of their nature. They constantly violate not only all rules of decorum, but the laws of decency itself.... They abuse our hospitality, insult our peculiar institutions, set at defiance all the refinements of life, and return home, lamenting the social anarchy of America, and retailing their own indecent conduct as the ordinary customs of the country.... The pranks which, in a backwoods American, would be stigmatized as shocking obscenity, become, when perpetrated by a rich Englishman, charming evidence of sportive humour," &c.

His keen insights next delve into some of the deep mysteries of animal nature: he realizes that the traits of the bull and the sheep have gradually blended into the national character, particularly in how people converse. "They haven't turned woolly, nor do they wear horns, but the upper class is always bragging about the amazing accomplishments of their ancestors, while the timid middle class meekly squeaks their approval.... Such topics make up their collection of light conversation," etc. From this elegant description of conversation, he moves on to the topic of social standing and describes a young nobleman on a steamer who refused to close a window when asked by a sick and suffering woman, telling her husband that "he couldn't agree to suffocate himself just because his wife was unwell." After crafting the story, he provides this delightful reason for his behavior: "He feared he might compromise his own status and that of his noble family back home by helping an ordinary person." He later addresses English visitors to America, claiming they "usually come to us completely stripped of the pretenses of their class. Free from the social constraints imposed on them at home by the various societal tiers, they lazily indulge in their inherent brutality. They frequently flout not only all rules of propriety but also the very laws of decency.... They take advantage of our hospitality, insult our unique customs, disregard all the refinements of life, and return home lamenting about America's social chaos, while recounting their own indecent behavior as typical of the country.... The antics which, in a rural American, would be labeled as shocking obscenity become, when committed by a wealthy Englishman, charming evidence of playful humor," etc.

A considerable portion of the volume is dedicated to Church matters; for which subject the meek and lowly style which characterizes his writing pre-eminently qualifies him, and to which, doubtless, he is indebted for the patronage of The Christian Advocate. I shall only indulge the reader with the following beautiful description of the Established Church:—"It is a bloated, unsightly mass of formalities, hypocrisy, bigotry, and selfishness, without a single charitable impulse or pious aspiration." After this touching display of genuine American feeling, he draws the picture of a clergyman in language so opposite, that one is reminded of a certain mysterious personage, usually represented with cloven feet, and who is said to be very apt at quoting Scripture.

A significant part of the book focuses on Church issues, and his gentle and humble writing style really suits this topic. It's likely that this style has earned him the support of The Christian Advocate. I’ll share with the reader a striking description of the Established Church:—"It is a bloated, unattractive mass of formalities, hypocrisy, bigotry, and selfishness, lacking any charitable impulse or spiritual aspiration." Following this heartfelt expression of genuine American sentiment, he paints a picture of a clergyman in such contrasting language that it reminds you of a certain mysterious figure, often depicted with cloven feet, who is said to be quite skilled at quoting Scripture.

Heraldry and ancestry succeed the Church in gaining a notice from his pen; and his researches have gone so deep, that one is led to imagine—despite his declarations of contempt—that he looks forward to becoming some day The Most Noble the Duke of Arkansas and Mississippi, with a second title of Viscount de' Tucky and Ohio;[BN] the "de" suggestive of his descent from The Three Continents. One of the most remarkable discoveries he has made, is, that "the soap-makers and the brewers are the compounders of the great staple commodities of consumption in Great Britain, and therefore surpass even Charles himself in the number of their additions to the Peerage." This valuable hint should not be lost upon those employed in these useful occupations, as hope is calculated to stimulate zeal and ambition.

Heraldry and ancestry take precedence over the Church when it comes to getting attention from his writing; and his research has delved so deeply that one might imagine—despite his claims of disdain—that he aspires to someday be The Most Noble Duke of Arkansas and Mississippi, with a second title of Viscount de' Tucky and Ohio;[BN] the "de" hinting at his lineage from The Three Continents. One of the most notable discoveries he has made is that "the soap-makers and the brewers are the creators of the major staple goods consumed in Great Britain, and therefore outnumber even Charles himself in terms of their additions to the Peerage." This important insight shouldn't be overlooked by those working in these valuable trades, as hope is likely to inspire enthusiasm and ambition.

The last quotations I propose making from this vigorous volume are taken from the seventh chapter, headed, "English Devotion to Dinner." On this subject the author seems to have had his keen discriminating powers peculiarly sharpened; and the observations made are in most lively and racy style, and—according to the Press—perfectly courteous. The Englishman "is never free till armed with a knife and fork; indeed, he is never completely himself without them[BO] ... which may he as properly considered integral portions of an Englishman, as claws are of a cat; ... they are not original even in their gluttony; ... they owe to a foreign nation the mean privilege of bestial indulgence; ... they make a run into Scotland for the sake of oatmeal cakes, and sojourn amongst the wild beauties of Switzerland in order to be convenient to goat's milk.... Like other carnivorous animals, an Englishman is always surly over his meals. Morose at all times, he becomes unbearably so at that interesting period of the day, when his soul appears to cower among plates and dishes; ... though he gorges his food with the silent deliberation of the anaconda, yet, in descanting upon the delicacies of the last capital dinner, he makes an approach to animation altogether unusual to him; ... when, upon such auspicious occasions, he does go off into something like gaiety, there is such fearful quivering of vast jelly mounds of flesh, something so supernaturally tremendous in his efforts, that, like the recoil of an overloaded musket, he never fails to astound those who happen to be near him." But his keen observation has discovered a practice before dinner, which, being introduced into the centre of various censures, may also be fairly supposed to be considered by him and his friends of the Press as most objectionable, and as forming one of the aggregate Items which constitute the English beast. "For dinner, he bathes, rubs, and dresses." How filthy! Yet be not too hard upon him, reader, for this observation; I have travelled in his neighbourhood, on the Mississippi steamers, and I can, therefore, well understand how the novelty of the operation must have struck him with astonishment, and how repugnant the practice must have been to his habits.

The last quotes I want to share from this bold book come from the seventh chapter, titled, "English Devotion to Dinner." On this topic, the author seems to have his sharp observational skills particularly honed; the comments he makes are mostly in a lively and engaging style, and—according to the Press—perfectly polite. The Englishman "is never free until he has a knife and fork in hand; in fact, he never feels fully himself without them[BO] ... which can be just as much a part of an Englishman as claws are to a cat; ... they're not even unique in their gluttony; ... they owe to another country the shameful privilege of indulgence; ... they make trips to Scotland for oatmeal cakes, and stay among the beautiful landscapes of Switzerland just to have access to goat's milk.... Like other meat-eating animals, an Englishman is always grumpy during his meals. Grumpy all the time, he becomes unbearably so at that particular time of day when his spirit seems to shrink among plates and dishes; ... even though he eats his food with the slow deliberation of an anaconda, when he talks about the delicacies of his last great dinner, he approaches a level of enthusiasm totally unusual for him; ... when, on such fortunate occasions, he does show some happiness, there’s a terrifying wobbling of large jelly-like mounds of flesh, something so unnaturally alarming in his efforts that, like the kickback of an overloaded musket, he never fails to surprise those around him." But his sharp eye has noticed a habit before dinner, which, being placed at the center of various criticisms, can also be reasonably thought to be seen by him and his Press friends as quite objectionable, and as part of the overall Items that make up the English beast. "Before dinner, he bathes, rubs himself down, and dresses." How disgusting! But don’t be too harsh on him, reader, for this observation; I've traveled in his area, on the Mississippi steamers, and I can easily see how startling the idea of bathing could be for him, and how repulsive that practice must have felt to his usual way of life.

Among other important facts connected with this great question, his discriminating mind has ascertained that an Englishman "makes it a rule to enjoy a dinner at his own expense as little as possible." Armed with this important discovery, he lets drive the following American shell, thus shivering to atoms the whole framework of our society. The nation may tremble as it reads these withering words of Kentucky eloquence:—"When it is remembered that of all the vices, avarice is most apt to corrupt the heart, and gluttony has the greatest tendency to brutalize the mind, it no longer continues surprising that an Englishman has become a proverb of meanness from Paris to Jerusalem. The hatred and contempt of all classes of society as necessarily attend him in his wanderings as his own shadow.... Equally repulsive to every grade of society, he stands isolated and alone, a solitary monument of the degradation of which human nature is capable."

Among other important facts related to this significant issue, his discriminating mind has figured out that an Englishman "makes it a point to enjoy a dinner at his own expense as little as possible." Armed with this important finding, he launches the following American critique, effectively dismantling the entire structure of our society. The nation may shudder as it reads these harsh words of Kentucky eloquence:—"When it is recognized that of all the vices, greed is most likely to corrupt the heart, and gluttony has the greatest tendency to degrade the mind, it’s no longer surprising that an Englishman has become a symbol of stinginess from Paris to Jerusalem. The hatred and contempt from all classes of society accompany him in his travels like his own shadow.... Equally repulsive to every level of society, he stands isolated and alone, a solitary testament to the degradation of which human nature is capable."

Feeling that ordinary language is insufficient to convey his courteous and chivalrous sentiments, he ransacks natural history in search of a sublime metaphor: his triumphant success he records in this beautifully expressed sentence—"The dilating power of the anaconda and the gizzard of the cassowary are the highest objects of his ambition." But neither ordinary language nor metaphor can satisfy his lofty aspirations: it requires something higher, it requires an embodiment of genuine American feeling, vigorous yet courteous; his giant intellect rises equal to the task. He warns my countrymen "to use expletives oven with the danger of being diffuse, rather than be so blunt and so vulgar;" and then—by way, I suppose, of showing them how to be sarcastic without being either blunt or vulgar—he delivers himself of the following magnificent bursts:—"If guts could perform the function of brains, Greece's seven wise men would cease to be proverbial, for England would present to the world twenty-seven millions of sages.... To eat, to drink, to look greasy, and to grow fat, appear to constitute, in their opinion, the career of a worthy British subject.... The lover never asks his fair one if she admires Donizetti's compositions, but tenderly inquires if she loves beef-steak pies. This sordid vice of greediness is rapidly brutalizing natures not originally spiritual; every other passion is sinking, oppressed by flabby folds of fat, into helplessness. All the mental energies are crushed beneath the oily mass. Sensibility is smothered in, the feculent steams of roast beef, and delicacy stained by the waste drippings of porter. The brain is slowly softening into blubber, and the liver is gradually encroaching upon the heart. All the nobler impulses of man are yielding to those animal propensities which must soon render Englishmen beasts in all save form alone."

Feeling that everyday language isn't enough to express his polite and chivalrous feelings, he digs through natural history in search of a powerful metaphor: he triumphantly records his success in this beautifully crafted sentence—"The stretching ability of the anaconda and the gizzard of the cassowary are the highest goals of his ambition." But neither everyday language nor metaphor can satisfy his high ambitions: it requires something greater, it requires an embodiment of genuine American spirit, strong yet polite; his brilliant mind rises to the challenge. He advises my fellow countrymen "to use expletives even at the risk of being wordy, rather than be so blunt and vulgar;" and then—perhaps to show them how to be sarcastic without being blunt or vulgar—he shares the following remarkable insights:—"If guts could do the job of brains, Greece's seven wise men would no longer be famous, as England would present to the world twenty-seven million sages.... To eat, to drink, to look greasy, and to get fat seem to make up, in their view, the life of a respectable British citizen.... The lover never asks his sweetheart if she appreciates Donizetti's music, but gently asks if she loves beef-steak pies. This disgusting vice of greed is quickly making brutish those unsophisticated souls; every other passion is fading, crushed by layers of fat, into helplessness. All mental energy is buried under the greasy weight. Sensitivity is suffocated in the foul fumes of roast beef, and delicacy is stained by the waste drippings of porter. The brain is slowly turning into fat, and the liver is steadily encroaching on the heart. All the nobler urges of humanity are yielding to those animal instincts that will soon turn Englishmen into beasts in all but appearance."

I have now finished my Elegant Extracts from the work of Mr. Ward. The reader can judge for himself of Boston's "vigorous volume," of Philadelphia's "delightful treat," of Rochester's "chivalrous and genuine Amercan feeling," of The Christian Advocate's "retort courteous," and of New Orleans' "aggregate outburst of the great American heart," &c. These compliments from the Press derive additional value from the following passage in the work they eulogize. Pages 96, 97, Mr. Ward writes: "It is the labour of every author so to adapt his style and sentiments to the tastes of his readers, as most probably to secure their approbation.... The consciousness that his success is so wholly dependent on their approval, will make him, without his being aware of it, adapt his ideas to theirs." And the New Orleans Press endorses all the author's sentiments, and insults American gentlemen and American intelligence, by asserting that it "admirably reveals the sentiments of the whole people, and will find sympathy in the mind of every true son of the soil."

I have now finished my Elegant Extracts from Mr. Ward's work. Readers can form their own opinions about Boston's "vigorous volume," Philadelphia's "delightful treat," Rochester's "chivalrous and genuine American feeling," The Christian Advocate's "courteous reply," and New Orleans' "outpouring of the great American heart," etc. These praises from the press gain more weight from the following passage in the work they praise. On pages 96 and 97, Mr. Ward writes: "It is the job of every author to tailor his style and ideas to the preferences of his readers in order to likely earn their approval.... The awareness that his success is entirely reliant on their approval will, often without his realization, lead him to align his thoughts with theirs." The New Orleans Press supports all of the author's views and diminishes American gentlemen and American intelligence by claiming that it "brilliantly reflects the sentiments of the entire populace and will resonate with every true child of the soil."

Before taking a final leave of English Items, I owe some apology to the reader for the length at which I have quoted from it. My only excuse is, that I desired to show the grounds upon which I spoke disparagingly of a portion of the Press, and of the low popular literature of the country. I might have quoted from various works instead of one; but if I had done so, it might fairly have been said that I selected an isolated passage for a particular purpose; or else, had I quoted largely, I might have been justly charged with being tedious. Besides which, to corroborate my assertions regarding the Press, I should have been bound to give their opinion also upon each book from which I quoted; and, beyond all these reasons, I felt that the generality of the works of low literature which I came across were from the pen of people with far less education than the author I selected, who, as I have before remarked, belongs to one of the wealthiest families in Kentucky, and for whom, consequently, neither the want of education nor the want of opportunities of mixing in respectable society—had he wished to do so—can be offered as the slightest extenuation.[BP]

Before I wrap up my thoughts on English Items, I need to apologize to the reader for how extensively I've quoted from it. My only justification is that I wanted to explain why I criticized part of the media and the low-quality popular literature in the country. I could have referenced various works instead of just one, but that might have led to the argument that I cherry-picked a passage for my own purpose. On the other hand, if I had quoted extensively, I could have been fairly accused of being boring. Additionally, to back up my claims about the media, I would have had to include their views on each book I cited. Beyond these concerns, I noticed that most of the low-quality literature was produced by authors who were much less educated than the writer I chose, who, as I mentioned before, comes from one of the wealthiest families in Kentucky. Therefore, neither lack of education nor lack of access to respectable social circles—if he had wanted it—can be used as an excuse for him.[BP]


I feel also that I owe some apology to my American friends for dragging such a work before the public; but I trust they will find sufficient excuse for my doing so, in the explanation thus afforded, of the way the mind of Young America gets poisoned, and which will also partly account for the abuse of this country that is continually appearing in their Press. I feel sure there is hardly a gentleman in America, whose acquaintance I had the pleasure of making, who would read even the first twenty pages of the book; and I am in justice hound to say, that among all the works of a similar class which I saw, English Items enjoys unapproachable pre-eminence in misrepresentation and vulgarity, besides being peculiarly contemptible, from the false being mixed up with many true statements of various evils and iniquities still existing in England, and which, being quoted from our own Press, are calculated to give the currency of truth to the whole work, among that mass of his countrymen who, with all their intelligence, are utterly ignorant of England, either socially or politically.

I also feel I owe an apology to my American friends for bringing this work to the public; but I hope they will find enough reason in the explanation provided here about how the mindset of Young America gets distorted, which also partly explains the constant criticism of this country that appears in their media. I'm confident there isn't a gentleman in America I've had the pleasure of meeting who would read even the first twenty pages of this book; and I must say, fairly, that among all the similar works I’ve seen, English Items stands out for its unmatched misrepresentation and crudeness, and is particularly despicable because it mixes many falsehoods with true statements about various issues and wrongs still present in England, which, when quoted from our own media, lend an air of truth to the entire work among those countrymen who, despite their intelligence, are completely unaware of England, either socially or politically.

The subsequent career of this censor of English manners and morals is too remarkable to be passed over in silence. I therefore now proceed to give you a short epitome of it, as a specimen of morals and manners in Kentucky, as exhibited by him, and his trial. My information is taken from the details of the trial published at full length, a copy of which I obtained in consequence of the extraordinary accounts of the transaction which I read in the papers. Professor Butler had formerly been tutor in the family of the Wards, and was equally esteemed by them and the public of Louisville generally. At the time of the following occurrence the Professor was Principal of the High School in that city.

The later career of this critic of English morals and behavior is too notable to ignore. So, I’m going to give you a brief overview of it, as an example of the morals and behaviors in Kentucky, as demonstrated by him and his trial. My information comes from the detailed trial accounts that were published in full, a copy of which I got because of the sensational news reports about the event that I read in the papers. Professor Butler had previously been a tutor for the Ward family and was well-respected by them and the general public in Louisville. At the time of the event I'm about to describe, the Professor was the Principal of the High School in that city.

One of the boys at the school was William—brother of Mr. Matt. F. Ward: it appears that in the opinion of the Professor the boy had been guilty of eating nuts in the school and denying it, for which offence he was called out and whipped, as the master told him, for telling a lie. Whether the charge or the punishment was just is not a point of any moment, though I must say the testimony goes far to justify both. William goes home, complains to his brother Matt. F., not so much of the severity of the punishment, as of being called a liar. The elder brother becomes highly indignant, and determines to go to the Professor and demand an apology. It must be remembered that the father was all this time in Louisville, and of course the natural person to have made any remonstrance with his old friend the Professor. Matt. F.'s family remind him that he is very weakly, and that one of the masters at the school is an enemy of his. They therefore beg of him to be calm, and to take his intermediate brother Robert with him, in case of accidents. He consents. He then goes to the gun-store of Messrs. Dixon and Gilmore, and purchases of the latter, about 9 A.M., two small pocket-pistols, three inches long in the barrel. These he gets Mr. Gilmore to load, but purchases no further ammunition. After this he proceeds with his brother Robert, who is armed with a bowie-knife, to the school. Not wishing to be unjust to Mr. Matt. F. Ward, I give the statement of the subsequent occurrence in the words of his brother Robert's evidence in court.[BQ]

One of the boys at the school was William—brother of Mr. Matt F. Ward. According to the Professor, the boy had eaten nuts at school and lied about it, so he was called out and punished with a spanking, which the master said was for lying. Whether the accusation or the punishment was fair isn’t really the main point, though I must say the evidence strongly supports both. William goes home and complains to his brother Matt F., not so much about how harsh the punishment was, but about being called a liar. The older brother gets really upset and decides to confront the Professor and demand an apology. It’s important to note that their father was away in Louisville, and he would have been the one to speak to his old friend the Professor about this. Matt F.'s family reminds him that he is quite frail and that one of the teachers at the school is against him. So, they urge him to stay calm and to take their brother Robert with him, just in case. He agrees. Then he heads to the gun store of Messrs. Dixon and Gilmore and buys two small pocket pistols with three-inch barrels from Mr. Gilmore around 9 A.M. He has Mr. Gilmore load them but buys no additional ammunition. After this, he and his brother Robert, who is carrying a bowie knife, head to the school. To be fair to Mr. Matt F. Ward, I’ll report what happened next based on Robert’s testimony in court.[BQ]

"On entering the school-room,[BR] Matt. asked for Butler. He came. Matt. remarked, I wish to have a talk with you. Butler said, Come into my private room. Matt. said, No; here is the place. Mr. Butler nodded. Matt. said, What are your ideas of justice? Which is the worst, the boy who begs chestnuts, and throws the shells on the floor, and lies about it, or my brother who gives them to him? Mr. Butler said he would not he interrogated, putting his pencil in his pocket and buttoning up his coat. Matt, repeated the question. Butler said, There is no such boy here. Matt. said, That settles the matter: you called my brother a liar, and for that I must have an apology. Butler said he had no apology to make. Is your mind made up? said Matt. Butler said it was. Then, said Matt., you must hear my opinion of you. You are a d----d scoundrel and a coward. Butler then struck Matt. twice, and pushed him back against the door. Matt. drew his pistol and fired. Butler held his hand on him for a moment. As the pistol fired, Sturgus[BS] came to the door. I drew my knife, and told him to stand back." Thus was Professor Butler, Principal of the High School of Louisville, shot by the author of English Items, with a pistol bought and loaded only an hour and a half previous, in broad daylight, and in the middle of his scholars. The Professor died during the night.

"Upon entering the classroom,[BR] Matt asked for Butler. He came in. Matt said, 'I want to talk to you.' Butler replied, 'Come into my private room.' Matt insisted, 'No; this is the place.' Mr. Butler nodded. Matt asked, 'What are your thoughts on justice? Who's worse, the boy who begs for chestnuts, throws the shells on the floor, and lies about it, or my brother who gives them to him?' Mr. Butler said he wouldn’t answer questions, tucking his pencil into his pocket and buttoning his coat. Matt repeated the question. Butler responded, 'There’s no such boy here.' Matt said, 'That settles it: you called my brother a liar, and for that, I want an apology.' Butler said he had no apology to give. 'Is your mind made up?' Matt pressed. Butler confirmed that it was. Then Matt declared, 'You need to hear my opinion of you. You are a damned scoundrel and a coward.' Butler then hit Matt twice and shoved him against the door. Matt pulled out his gun and fired. Butler placed his hand on him for a second. As the gun went off, Sturgus[BS] arrived at the door. I pulled out my knife and told him to back off." This was how Professor Butler, Principal of the High School of Louisville, was shot by the author of English Items, with a gun purchased and loaded just an hour and a half earlier, in broad daylight, in front of his students. The Professor died later that night.

The details of the trial are quite unique as to the language employed by jury, counsel, and evidence; but I purposely abstain from making extracts, though I could easily quote passages sufficiently ridiculous and amusing, and others which leave a painful impression of the state of law in Kentucky. My reason for abstaining is, that if I quoted at all, I ought to do so at greater length than the limits of a book of travels would justify: suffice it that I inform you that Mr. Matthew F. Ward was tried and acquitted.

The details of the trial are pretty unique in terms of the language used by the jury, lawyers, and evidence; however, I intentionally avoid quoting anything, even though I could easily pull out passages that are both ridiculous and funny, alongside others that leave a troubling impression of the legal situation in Kentucky. My reason for not quoting is that if I did, I'd need to provide more context than what a travel book would allow: for now, let me just tell you that Mr. Matthew F. Ward was tried and found not guilty.

When the result of the trial was made known, an indignation meeting was held in Louisville, presided over by General Thomas Strange, at which various resolutions were passed unanimously. The first was in the following terms:—"Resolved—That the verdict of the jury, recently rendered in the Hardin County Court, by which Matt. F. Ward was declared innocent of any crime in the killing of William H.G. Butler, is in opposition to all the evidence in the case, contrary to our ideas of public justice, and subversive of the fundamental principles of personal security guaranteed to us by the constitution of the State.

When the trial's outcome was announced, a meeting to express anger was held in Louisville, led by General Thomas Strange, where several resolutions were passed unanimously. The first one stated:—"Resolved—That the jury's verdict, recently given in the Hardin County Court, which declared Matt. F. Ward innocent of any crime in the killing of William H.G. Butler, goes against all the evidence in the case, contradicts our understanding of public justice, and undermines the basic principles of personal security guaranteed to us by the State's constitution."

"Secondly: Resolved—That the published evidence given on the trial of Matt. F. Ward shows, beyond all question, that a most estimable citizen, and a most amiable, moral, and peaceable man has been wantonly and cruelly killed while in the performance of his regular and responsible duties as a teacher of youth; and, notwithstanding the verdict of a corrupt and venal jury, the deliberate judgment of the heart and conscience of this community pronounces that killing to be murder." The committee appointed by the meeting also requested Mr. Wolfe, one of the counsel for the prisoner, to resign his seat in the State Senate, and the Honourable Mr. Crittenden, another counsel, to resign his place in the Senate of the United States; effigies of the two brothers Ward were burnt, and a public subscription opened to raise a monument to the murdered Professor. I cannot, of course, decide how far the conclusions of the committee are just, as I do not pretend to know Kentucky law. I have, however, given the trial to members of the Bar in this country accustomed to deal with such cases, and they have without hesitation asserted that not one man in ten who has been hanged in England has been condemned on more conclusive evidence. It is also apparent that in some parts of the Union the same opinion prevails, as the following paragraph from the New York Daily Times will clearly show:—"The trial is removed from the scene of the homicide, so that the prisoners shall Dot be tried by those who knew them best, but is taken to a distant country. The Press is forbidden, against all law and right, to publish a report of the proceedings while the trial is in progress. Every particle of evidence in regard to Butler's character is excluded; while a perfect army of witnesses—clergymen, colonels, members of Congress, editors, cabinet officers, &c., who had enjoyed the social intimacy of the Wards—testified ostentatiously to the prisoner's mildness of temper, declaring him, with anxious and undisguised exaggeration, to be gentle and amiable to a fault. All these preparations, laboriously made and steadily followed up, were for the purpose, not of determining the truth, which is the only proper object of judicial inquiry—not of ascertaining accurately and truly whether Matthew Ward did or did not murder Butler—but to secure impunity for his act. This whole drama was enacted to induce the jury to affirm a falsehood; and it has succeeded. We do not believe John J. Crittenden entertains in his heart the shadow of a doubt that Butler was murdered: we do not believe that a single man on that jury believes that the man they have acquitted is innocent of the crime laid to his charge. We regard the issue of this trial as of the gravest importance: it proves that in one State of this Union, wealth is stronger than justice; that Kentucky's most distinguished sons take to their hearts and shield with all their power a murderer who has money and social position at his command; and that under their auspices, legal tribunals and the most solemn forms of justice have been made to confer impunity on one of the blackest and most wanton murders which the annals of crime record."

"Secondly: Resolved—That the evidence presented during the trial of Matt. F. Ward clearly shows that a highly respected citizen, and a kind, moral, and peaceful man, was brutally and senselessly killed while fulfilling his regular and important duties as a teacher; and, despite the verdict of a corrupt and biased jury, the collective judgment of this community declares that this killing is murder." The committee appointed by the meeting also asked Mr. Wolfe, one of the lawyers for the defendant, to step down from his position in the State Senate, and the Honorable Mr. Crittenden, another lawyer, to resign from the U.S. Senate; effigies of the two Ward brothers were burned, and a public fundraiser was launched to create a monument for the murdered Professor. I cannot, of course, determine how fair the committee's conclusions are, as I am not familiar with Kentucky law. However, I have consulted with members of the Bar in this country who are experienced in such cases, and they have confidently stated that not one in ten who has been executed in England was condemned on stronger evidence. It is also clear that in some areas of the Union, the same belief exists, as the following excerpt from the New York Daily Times will clearly demonstrate:—"The trial is moved far from the crime scene so that the defendants are not judged by those who know them best, but are taken to a remote place. The Press is unjustly prohibited from reporting on the proceedings while the trial is ongoing. Every piece of evidence regarding Butler's character is excluded; meanwhile, a full array of witnesses—clergymen, colonels, Congress members, editors, cabinet officials, etc.—who had close relationships with the Wards, testified overly positively about the defendant’s mild nature, describing him with exaggerated enthusiasm as gentle and amiable to a fault. All these efforts, painstakingly arranged and continually pursued, were not aimed at discovering the truth, which should be the primary goal of judicial inquiry—not at accurately determining whether Matthew Ward did or did not murder Butler—but to ensure he escapes punishment for his actions. This entire spectacle was staged to persuade the jury to support a falsehood; and it has succeeded. We do not believe John J. Crittenden has the slightest doubt in his heart that Butler was murdered: we do not think that a single juror believes the man they have exonerated is innocent of the crime he’s accused of. We view the outcome of this trial as critically important: it demonstrates that in one state of this Union, wealth trumps justice; that Kentucky's most distinguished individuals protect and defend a murderer who has money and social standing; and that under their influence, legal courts and the most serious forms of justice have been manipulated to grant immunity for one of the most heinous and malicious murders in the history of crime."

I add no comment, leaving the reader to make his own, deductions, and I only hope, if the foregoing lines should ever meet the eye of a citizen belonging to the sovereign State of Kentucky, they may stir him up to amend the law or to purify the juries.

I have no comments to add, and I’ll let the reader draw their own conclusions. I just hope that if these lines ever reach a citizen of the great State of Kentucky, they will inspire them to change the law or improve the jury system.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

The reader is requested to remember that all the words printed in italics—while dealing with English Items—are so done to show that they are quotations from the eulogies of the American press. They are as thoroughly repudiated by me as they must be by every American gentleman.


Did Mr. Ward ever read any account in the gazettes of his own country, of the poor soldiers going to "Washington to procure land warrants, and after being detained there till they were reduced to beggary, receiving no attention? Let me commend the following letter, taken from the press of his own country, dated July 6, 1853, and addressed to the President:— "DEAR SIR,—In the humblest tone do I implore your charity for three cents, to enable me to procure something to eat. Pray be so kind, and receive the grateful thanks of your humble supplicant of Shenandoah County, Va."


The reader will be astonished to know that these remarks are from the pen of a Kentucky man; in which State there is a large hole in the ground, made by Providence, and called "The Mammoth Cave;" it is situated on private property, and for the privilege of lionizing it, you pay 10s. So carefully is it watched, that no one is even allowed to make a plan of it, lest some entrance should be found available on the adjoining property.


I must beg the reader to remember this last sentence when he comes to the interview between the Kentucky author and his old friend, the schoolmaster.


Kentucky is the State of his birth and family, Arkansas the State of his adoption, and "The Three Continents" the fruit of his pen.


The reader will find that, in his interview with the schoolmaster, his brother was "completely himself" with a bowie-knife only.


One other instance I must give of the coolness with which an American writer can pen the most glaring falsehood; vide "English Traits," by R.W. Emerson. I might quote many fake impressions conveyed, but I shall confine myself to one of his observations upon a religious subject, where at least decency might have made him respect truth. At page 126 I find the following sentence:—"They put up no Socratic prayer, much less any saintly prayer, for the Queen's mind; ask neither for light nor right, but say bluntly, 'grant her in health and wealth long to live.'" Now, I will not ask whether the author of this passage ever saw our Book of Common Prayer, because printing the words in inverted commas is proof sufficient; nor will I go out of my way to show the many prayers put up for the bestowal of purely spiritual blessings; but, when I find the previous sentence to the one quoted by him to be as follows, "Endow her plenteously with heavenly gifts," what can I say of such a writer? Either that by heavenly gifts he understands dollars and cents, or that he has wilfully sacrificed religious truth at the shrine of democratic popularity. Having placed him on these two horns of a dilemma, I leave him to arrange his seat.


Of course the evidence of the brother is the most favourable to Mr. M.F.W. that the trial produces.


It appears in evidence that the scene described took place about half-past ten A.M.


Mr. Sturgus is the master who was supposed to be unfriendly to Mr. Matthew F. Ward.



CHAPTER XXV.

The Institution of Slavery.




There is one subject which no person who pretends to convey to the reader the honest thoughts and impressions which occupied his mind during his travels in this vast Republic, can pass over in silence; and that subject, I need scarcely observe, is Slavery. It is an institution which deserves most serious consideration; for while a general unity of sentiment binds the various States together in a manner that justifies the national motto, "E pluribus unum," the question of slavery hangs fearfully over their Union; and the thread by which it is suspended is more uncertain than the fragile hair of the sword of Damocles, for it is dependent upon the angry passions of angry man.

There’s one topic that anyone who wants to share their honest thoughts and experiences from their travels in this vast country cannot ignore, and that topic is slavery. It’s an issue that deserves serious attention. While a general sense of togetherness connects the different states, which supports the national motto, "E pluribus unum," the issue of slavery looms ominously over their unity; and the thread that keeps it in place is more unstable than the thin hair dangling from the sword of Damocles, reliant on the volatile emotions of angry people.

So true do I feel this to be, that were I a citizen of one of the Free States of America, I might hesitate before I committed my opinions to the Press. I trust, however, that I may so treat the subject that no cause for ill-blood may be given. Unquestionably, the origin of the evil is wholly with the mother country. We entered into the diabolical traffic of our fellow-creatures, and forced the wretched negro upon a land which had never before received the impress of a slave's foot; and this we did despite all the remonstrances of the outraged and indignant colonists; and with this revolting sin upon our shoulders, it is but natural we should feel deeply interested in the sable ivy-shoot we planted, and which now covers the whole southern front of the stately edifice of the Giant Republic. Time was when a Newcastle collier might have carried the sable shoot back to the soil whence it had been stolen; now, the keels of many nations combined would scarce suffice to move the rapid growth.

I truly believe this, that if I were a citizen of one of the Free States of America, I might think twice before sharing my opinions with the Press. However, I hope to approach the subject in a way that doesn’t cause any hard feelings. Undoubtedly, the root of the problem lies entirely with the mother country. We got involved in the horrific trade of our fellow human beings and forced the miserable African into a land that had never before felt the presence of a slave; and we did this despite all the protests from the outraged and angry colonists. With this shocking sin on our consciences, it’s only natural that we feel a deep connection to the dark vine we planted, which now covers the entire southern front of the grand structure of the Giant Republic. There was a time when a coal miner from Newcastle could have taken that dark vine back to the land it was taken from; now, even the ships of many nations combined would hardly be enough to transport its rapid growth.

But, while at England's door lies the original guilt, America has since put the solemn seal of her paternity upon it; every foot of land which, in the rapid career of her aggrandisement, has been sullied with the footsteps of the slave for the first time, mars the beauty of the cap of liberty, and plants a slave-trader's star in the banner of the nation. She is only doing a century later what we wickedly did a century before—viz., planting slavery on a soil hitherto free, and enlarging the market for the sale of flesh and blood. The futile excuse sometimes offered, that they were merely moved from one part to another of the same country, cannot be admitted; or, if it be, upon the same principle all the Free States might return again to slavery. If it be no sin to introduce slavery into a free Sovereign State, then was England not so guilty in the first instance, for she sent slaves from a land of ignorance, cruelty, and idolatry, to an enlightened and Christian colony. It is in vain for either England or the United States to shirk the guilty responsibility of introducing slaves on free soil. England has the additional guilt of having acted against the wishes of the colonists; the United States has the additional guilt of increasing slave territory a century later, and when the philanthropists of every country were busied in endeavours to solve the problem, "How can slavery be abolished?"

But, while England originally holds the guilt, America has since added her own heavy seal of responsibility; every piece of land that, during her rapid expansion, has been tainted by the footsteps of a slave for the first time, tarnishes the beauty of liberty and places a slave trader's star on the nation's flag. She is simply doing now what we wrongfully did a century ago—namely, establishing slavery on previously free soil and enlarging the market for the sale of human beings. The weak excuse sometimes given, that they were just moved from one part of the same country to another, cannot be accepted; or, if it is, then by the same logic all the Free States could revert to slavery. If it's not a sin to bring slavery into a free Sovereign State, then England wasn't so guilty when she first sent slaves from a land of ignorance, cruelty, and idolatry to an enlightened and Christian colony. It’s pointless for either England or the United States to try to escape the guilty responsibility of introducing slaves on free land. England bears the additional guilt of having acted against the will of the colonists; the United States has the extra guilt of expanding slave territory a century later, while the philanthropists of every nation were occupied trying to figure out how to abolish slavery.

Without dwelling further upon respective guilt, I will at once proceed to review the crusades which have been made against the institution, and the hopes of the slave under it; after which, I will offer for consideration such proposals as appear to me worthy the attention of all the true friends of the negro, whether owners or not. While thus treating the subject, I beg to observe that I fully recognise each individual State as possessing plenipotentiary powers within the limits of that constitution by which they are all bound together: and I trust that, in any observations I may make, no one expression will be so misconstrued as to give offence; for I know full well the stupendous difficulties with which the whole question is surrounded, and I feel it is one which should be approached only in a true spirit of charity and kindness towards the much-maligned gentlemen of the South.

Without going into detail about individual guilt, I'll immediately review the campaigns against the institution and the hopes of the enslaved individuals under it. Afterwards, I'll present proposals that I believe deserve the attention of all genuine friends of the Black community, whether they own slaves or not. As I address this topic, I want to acknowledge that I fully recognize each state as having full authority within the framework of the constitution that unites them all. I hope that my comments won’t be misinterpreted in a way that causes offense, as I am well aware of the enormous challenges surrounding this issue. I believe it should be approached only with genuine goodwill and kindness toward the often-misunderstood individuals in the South.

I open the question by asking—what is the meaning of the cry raised by the fanatics of the North—the abolition crusaders? In words, it is freedom to the slave; in fact, it is spoliation of their neighbours. Had the proposition come from wild Arabs who live in houses they carry on their backs, and feed on the milk of flocks that pasture at their side, I might have comprehended the modest proposal; but coming from those whose energy for business is proverbial, and whose acuteness in all matters of dollars and cents is unsurpassed, if equalled, by the shrewdest Hebrew of the Hebrews, I confess it is beyond my puny imagination to fathom. Were it accompanied with any pecuniary offer adequate to the sacrifice proposed, I might be able to comprehend it: but for those, or the descendants of those, who, as they found white labour more profitable, sold their sable brethren to their southern neighbours, and thus easily and profitably removed slavery from their borders,—for those, I say, to turn round and preach a crusade for the emancipation of the negro, in homilies of contumely, with the voice of self-righteousness, exhibits a degree of assurance that cannot be surpassed. Had they known as much of human nature as of the laws of profit and loss, they might have foreseen that in every epithet heaped upon their southern countrymen, they were riveting a fresh bolt in the slave's fetters. On what plea did the American colony rebel? Was it not, as a broad principle, the right of self-government? Does not their constitution allow independent action to each State, subject only to certain obligations, binding alike on all? If those are complied with, on what principle of patriotism or honour do individuals or societies hurl torches of discord among their southern co-citizens?

I start by asking—what is the significance of the outcry from the Northern fanatics—the abolitionists? They claim it’s about freedom for slaves; in reality, it’s about taking from their neighbors. If this idea had come from nomadic tribes who live in portable homes and survive on the milk from their herds, I might have understood the simple suggestion. But coming from people known for their business savvy and unmatched skills in dealing with money, it’s hard for me to grasp. If they had offered a financial incentive that matched the sacrifice they’re proposing, I might find it easier to understand. But for those, or their descendants, who found white labor more lucrative and sold their Black brothers to their Southern neighbors, easily removing slavery from their states,—for them to suddenly advocate for the emancipation of Black people with self-righteous sermons only shows an audacity that’s hard to beat. If they understood human nature as well as they understand profit and loss, they would have realized that every insult directed at their Southern fellow citizens only strengthens the chains of the enslaved. What was the reason behind the American colonies' rebellion? Wasn’t it fundamentally about the right to self-govern? Doesn’t their constitution allow each State to operate independently, as long as they meet certain shared obligations? If those obligations are met, on what grounds do individuals or groups sow discord among their Southern fellow citizens?

No person who has watched or inquired into the social state of the slaves during the present century, can fail to have observed that much has been done to improve their condition among the respectable holders thereof, both as regards common education and religious instruction; at the same time, they will perceive that the first law of nature—self-preservation—compelled them to make common education penal, as soon as fanatical abolitionists inundated the country with firebrand pamphlets. No American can deny, that when an oppressed people feel their chains galling to them, they have a right to follow the example of the colonists, and strike for freedom. This right doubtless belongs to the negro, and these inflammable publications were calculated to lead them on to make the effort. But what reflecting mind can fail to foresee the horrors consequent upon such a hopeless endeavour? More especially must it have presented itself to the mind of the slave-masters; and could they, with sure visions before their eyes of the fearful sacrifice of human life, the breaking-up of whatever good feeling now exists between master and slave, and the inauguration of a reign of terror and unmitigated severity—could they, I say, with such consequences staring them in the face, have taken a more mild, sensible, and merciful step than checking that education, through the instrumentality of which, the abolitionists were hastening forward so awful a catastrophe?

No one who has observed or looked into the social conditions of slaves in this century can fail to notice that a lot has been done to improve their situation among responsible slaveholders, especially in terms of basic education and religious instruction. At the same time, it’s clear that the most basic instinct—self-preservation—forced them to make education illegal as soon as radical abolitionists flooded the nation with incendiary pamphlets. No American can deny that when an oppressed group feels their chains choking them, they have the right to follow the example of the colonists and fight for freedom. This right certainly belongs to Black people, and those provocative publications were likely designed to encourage them to take action. But what thoughtful person can ignore the horrific consequences that would result from such a desperate struggle? This must have been especially clear to the slaveholders; and could they, with the grim prospects of massive loss of life, the breakdown of any goodwill that currently exists between master and slave, and the start of a period of terror and extreme cruelty—could they, I ask, have taken a more reasonable, sensible, and compassionate action than to halt the education that the abolitionists were pushing toward such a terrible disaster?

The following extract may suffice to prove the irritation produced by the abolitionists in Virginia, though, of course, I do not pretend to insinuate that the respectable portion of the community in that State would endorse its barbarous ravings:—

The following extract may be enough to show the irritation caused by the abolitionists in Virginia, although I certainly don't mean to suggest that the respectable part of the community in that state would support its barbaric rants:—

"SLAVERY IN THE SCHOOL-ROOM.—The (American) Richmond Examiner, in connexion with the recent trial of Ward of Kentucky, has the following theory on the extinction of schoolmasters in general:—'The South has for years been overrun with hordes of illiterate, unprincipled graduates of the Yankee free schools (those hot-beds of self-conceit and ignorance), who have, by dint of unblushing impudence, established themselves as schoolmasters in our midst. So odious are some of these "itinerant ignoramuses" to the people of the South; so full of abolitionism and concealed incendiarism are many of this class; so full of guile, fraud, and deceit,—that the deliberate shooting one of them down, in the act of poisoning the minds of our slaves or our children, we think, if regarded as homicide at all, should always be deemed perfectly justifiable; and we imagine the propriety of shooting an abolition schoolmaster, when caught tampering with our slaves, has never been questioned by any intelligent Southern man. This we take to be the unwritten common law of the South, and we deem it advisable to promulgate the law, that it may be copied into all the abolition papers, thundered at by the three thousand New England preachers, and read with peculiar emphasis, and terrible upturning of eyes, by Garrison, at the next meeting of the anti-slavery party at Faneuil Hall. We repeat, that the shooting of itinerant abolition schoolmasters is frequently a creditable and laudable act, entitling a respectable Southern man to, at least, a seat in the Legislature or a place in the Common Council. Let all Yankee schoolmasters who propose invading the South, endowed with a strong nasal twang, a long scriptural name, and Webster's lexicographic book of abominations, seek some more congenial land, where their own lives will be more secure than in the "vile and homicidal Slave States." We shall be glad if the ravings of the abolition press about the Ward acquittal shall have this effect.'"

"SLAVERY IN THE SCHOOL-ROOM.—The (American) Richmond Examiner, in connection with the recent trial of Ward from Kentucky, shares the following theory about the decline of teachers in general:—'The South has been flooded for years with numerous illiterate, unprincipled graduates from Yankee free schools (those breeding grounds of arrogance and ignorance), who have, through sheer nerve, set themselves up as teachers among us. Some of these "wandering know-nothings" are so despised by the people of the South; so filled with abolitionist ideas and hidden agendas are many from this group; so filled with tricks, scams, and lies,—that we believe shooting one of them, while they are trying to poison our slaves or our children's minds, should be seen, if considered a homicide at all, as completely justifiable; and we think no reasonable Southern man questions the appropriateness of shooting an abolitionist teacher caught meddling with our slaves. This we consider to be the unwritten common law of the South, and we find it prudent to make this law known, so it can be published in all the abolitionist papers, condemned by the three thousand New England preachers, and read with particular emphasis, and dramatic expressions, by Garrison, at the next anti-slavery meeting at Faneuil Hall. We reiterate that the shooting of wandering abolitionist teachers is often a commendable and admirable act, deserving a respectable Southern man at least a position in the Legislature or in the Common Council. Let all Yankee teachers who plan to come to the South, equipped with a strong nasal accent, a long biblical name, and Webster's dictionary of offenses, find a more suitable place, where their own safety will be greater than in the "wicked and violent Slave States." We would welcome if the outcry from the abolitionist press about the Ward acquittal results in this outcome.'"

We now see that the abolitionists have rendered the education of the negro, with a view to his ultimate fitness for freedom or self-government, utterly impracticable, however anxious the slave-owner might have otherwise been to instruct him. Thus, by their imprudent violence, they have effectually closed the educational pathway to emancipation. It should not either be forgotten that the Southerners may have seen good reason to doubt the Christian sincerity of those who clamoured so loudly for loosening the fetters of the slaves. The freed slaves in the Northern States must have frequently been seen by them, year after year, as they went for "the season" to the watering-places, and could they observe much in his position there to induce the belief that the Northerners are the friends of the negro? In some cities, he must not drive a coach or a car; in others, he must not enter a public conveyance; in places of amusement, he is separated from his white friend; even in the house of that God with whom "there is no respect of persons," he is partitioned off as if he were an unclean animal; in some States he is not admitted at all.

We now see that the abolitionists have made it impossible to educate Black people for their eventual freedom or self-government, no matter how eager slave owners might have been to teach them. By their reckless actions, they have effectively shut down the educational path to emancipation. It should also be noted that Southerners might have had valid reasons to question the genuine Christian motives of those who loudly demanded the release of the slaves. Year after year, they likely observed the freed slaves in the Northern States during “the season” at resorts, and what could they see in their situation that would convince them that Northerners truly care about Black people? In some cities, they can’t drive a carriage or a streetcar; in others, they can’t even use public transport; at entertainment venues, they are segregated from their white friends; even in the house of God, where “there is no respect of persons,” they are separated as if they were unclean; in some states, they aren’t allowed at all.

With such evidences of friendship for the negro, might they not question the honesty of Northern champions of emancipation? Could they really place confidence in the philanthropic professions of those who treat the negro as an outcast, and force on him a life of wretchedness instead of striving to raise him in the social scale? If a negro had the intellect of a Newton—if he were clothed in purple and fine linen, and if he came fresh from an Oriental bath, and fragrant as "Araby's spices," a Northerner would prefer sitting down with a pole-cat—he would rather pluck a living coal from the fire than grasp the hand of the worthiest negro that ever stepped. Whoever sees a negro in the North smile at the approach of the white man? Who has not seen a worthy planter or slave-owner returning from a short absence, greeted with smiles in abundance, or perhaps receiving a broad grin of pride and pleasure as the worthy owner gave his hand to some old faithful slave?

With such evidence of friendship for the Black community, could they not question the sincerity of Northern advocates for emancipation? Could they genuinely trust the charitable claims of those who treat Black people as outcasts and impose a life of misery on them instead of working to elevate them in society? If a Black person had the intellect of a Newton—if he were dressed in fine clothes, and if he came freshly from an Eastern bath, smelling as sweet as "Arabian spices," a Northerner would prefer sitting down with a skunk—he would rather pick up a live coal from the fire than shake hands with the most deserving Black person who ever lived. Who sees a Black person in the North smile at the approach of a white person? Who hasn’t seen a respected landowner or slaveholder return from a short trip, greeted with plenty of smiles, or perhaps receiving a broad grin of pride and happiness as the esteemed owner shook hands with an old loyal slave?

I think I have shown, in the foregoing remarks, that the Southern has three solid and distinct grounds of objection to the Free States abolitionist. First,—The natural spirit of man, which rebels against wholesale vituperation and calumny. Secondly,—The obstacle they have placed in the way of giving the slave simple education, by introducing most inflammable pamphlets. Thirdly,—The questionable sincerity of their professed sympathy for the slave, as evidenced by the antipathy they exhibit towards the free negro, and by the palpable fact that he is far worse off in a free than in a slave State.

I believe I've demonstrated in my previous comments that the Southern perspective has three clear and distinct objections to the abolitionists from the Free States. First, the inherent nature of humans resists widespread insults and slander. Second, the barriers they create to providing basic education to slaves by distributing highly inflammatory pamphlets. Third, the questionable sincerity of their claimed concern for the slaves, as shown by their hostility towards free Black individuals, and the obvious fact that they are often worse off in a free state than in a slave state.

The same objection cannot justly be taken against English abolitionists, because they act and think chiefly upon the evidence furnished by American hands; besides which, slavery in the West Indian colonies was felt by the majority of the nation to be so dark a stain upon our national character, that, although burdened with a debt such as the world never before dreamt of, the sum of 20,000,000l. was readily voted for the purposes of emancipation. Whether the method in which the provisions of the act were carried out was very wise or painfully faulty, we need not stop to inquire: the object was a noble one, and the sacrifice was worthy of the object.

The same criticism can't fairly be directed at English abolitionists, because they primarily rely on evidence provided by American sources. Moreover, the majority of the nation viewed slavery in the West Indian colonies as a deep stain on our national character. Even though we were burdened with an unprecedented debt, a sum of £20,000,000 was easily approved for the purpose of emancipation. Whether the way the provisions of the act were implemented was very wise or deeply flawed is not our concern here: the goal was admirable, and the sacrifice was deserving of that goal.

With all the feelings of that discussion fresh in the public mind, it is no wonder that philanthropists, reading the accounts published by American authors of the horrors of slavery, should band themselves together for the purpose of urging America in a friendly tone to follow Great Britain's noble example, and to profit by any errors she had committed as to the method of carrying emancipation into effect. I am quite aware a slaveholder may reply, "This is all very good; but I must have a word with you, good gentlemen of England, as to sincerity. If you hold slavery so damnable a sin, why do you so greedily covet the fruits of the wages of that sin? The demand of your markets for slave produce enhances the value of the slave, and in so doing clenches another nail in the coffin, of his hopes." I confess I can give no reply, except the humiliating confession which, if the feeling of the nation is to be read in its Parliamentary acts, amounts to this—"We have removed slavery from our own soil, and we don't care a farthing if all the rest of the world are slaves, provided only we can get cheap cotton and sugar, &c. Mammon! Mammon! Mammon! is ever the presiding deity of the Anglo-Saxon race, whether in the Old or the New World.

With all the feelings from that discussion fresh in the public mind, it’s no surprise that philanthropists, reading the reports by American authors about the horrors of slavery, would team up to encourage America, in a friendly manner, to follow Great Britain’s noble example and learn from any mistakes made in how to carry out emancipation. I’m well aware that a slaveholder might respond, “This is all well and good; but I need to have a word with you, good gentlemen of England, regarding sincerity. If you truly believe slavery is such a terrible sin, why do you eagerly seek the benefits that come from that sin? The demand in your markets for slave-produced goods increases the value of the slave and solidifies yet another nail in the coffin of his hopes.” I admit I can offer no response, other than the humbling admission that, if the nation's sentiment is reflected in its Parliamentary actions, it boils down to this: “We’ve eliminated slavery from our own land, and we don’t care a bit if the rest of the world remains enslaved, as long as we can get cheap cotton and sugar, etc. Mammon! Mammon! Mammon! is always the ruling god of the Anglo-Saxon race, whether in the Old World or the New World.

There can be no doubt that the reception of Mrs. Beecher Stowe's work and person in England was very galling to many a Southerner, and naturally so; because it conveyed a tacit endorsement of all her assertions as to the horrors of the slavery system. When I first read Uncle Tom, I said, "This will rather tend to rivet than to loosen the fetters of the slave, rousing the indignation of all the South against her and her associates." Everything I have since seen, heard, and read, only tends to confirm my original impression. While I would readily give Mrs. Stowe a chaplet of laurel as a clever authoress, I could never award her a faded leaf as the negro's friend. There can be no doubt that Mrs. Beecher Stowe has had no small share in the abolition excitement which has been raging in the States, and which has made Kansas the battle-field of civil war; but the effect of this agitation has gone farther: owing to husting speeches and other occurrences, the negro's mind has been filled with visionary hopes of liberty; insurrections have been planned, and, worse still, insurrections have been imagined. In fear for life and property, torture worthy of the worst days of the Inquisition has been resorted to, to extort confession from those who had nothing to confess. Some died silent martyrs; others, in their agony, accused falsely the first negro whose name came to their memory; thus, injustice bred injustice, and it is estimated that not less than a thousand wretched victims have closed their lives in agony. One white man, who was found encouraging revolt, and therefore merited punishment of the severest kind, was sentenced, in that land of equality, to 900 lashes, and died under the infliction—a sight that would have gladdened the eyes of Bloody Jeffreys. And why all these horrors? I distinctly say,—thanks to the rabid Abolitionists.

There is no doubt that the reception of Mrs. Beecher Stowe's work and her presence in England was quite upsetting to many Southerners, and understandably so; because it signaled a silent approval of all her claims about the horrors of the slavery system. When I first read Uncle Tom, I thought, "This will likely tighten rather than loosen the chains of the slave, provoking the anger of all the South against her and her supporters." Everything I've seen, heard, and read since has only confirmed my initial impression. While I would gladly acknowledge Mrs. Stowe as a skilled author, I could never consider her a true friend of the black community. It's clear that Mrs. Beecher Stowe played a significant role in the abolitionist fervor that has been spreading across the States, turning Kansas into a battleground for civil war; but the impact of this turmoil has gone further: due to campaign speeches and other events, the minds of black people have been filled with unrealistic hopes of freedom; plots of rebellion have been conceived, and, worse yet, imagined. Out of fear for their lives and property, cruel measures—worthy of the worst days of the Inquisition—have been used to extract confessions from those who had nothing to admit. Some died as silent martyrs; others, in their pain, falsely accused the first black person whose name came to mind; thus, injustice led to more injustice, and it is estimated that at least a thousand unfortunate victims have ended their lives in suffering. One white man, who was found encouraging rebellion and thus deserved the harshest punishment, was sentenced in that land of equality to 900 lashes and died from it—a sight that would have pleased the likes of Bloody Jeffreys. And why all these atrocities? I say it clearly—thanks to the extreme Abolitionists.

Let me now for a moment touch upon the treatment of slaves. The farms of the wealthy planters, and the chapels with negro minister and negro congregation, bear bright evidence to the fact that negroes have their bodily and spiritual wants attended to, not forgetting also the oral teaching they often receive from the wife of the planter. But is that system universal? Those who would answer that question truthfully need not travel to the Southern States for documentary evidence. Is any human being fit to be trusted with absolute power over one of his fellow-creatures, however deeply his public reputation and his balance at the banker's may be benefited by the most moderate kindness to them? If every man were a Howard or a Wilberforce, and every woman a Fry or a Nightingale, the truth would be ever the same, and they would be the first to acknowledge it.—Man is unfit for irresponsible power.

Let me take a moment to talk about how slaves are treated. The plantations of wealthy landowners, along with chapels featuring Black ministers and congregations, clearly show that Black people have their physical and spiritual needs met, not to mention the guidance they often receive from the planters’ wives. But is this system universal? Those who want to answer that honestly don’t need to go to the Southern States for proof. Is there really any person who should have total power over another, no matter how much their reputation and bank account might benefit from showing them moderate kindness? Even if every man were like Howard or Wilberforce, and every woman like Fry or Nightingale, the truth would still be the same, and they would be the first to admit it. —People are not fit for unchecked power.

Now the only bar before which the proprietor of slaves is likely to be arraigned, is the bar of public opinion; and the influence which that knowledge will have upon his conduct is exactly in the inverse ratio to its need; for the hardened brute, upon whom its influence is most wanted, is the very person who, if he can escape lynching, is indifferent to public opinion. No Southerner can be affronted, if I say that he is not more Christian, kind-hearted, and mild-tempered than his fellow-man in the Northern States, in France, or in England; and yet how constantly do we find citizens of those communities evincing unrestrained passions in the most brutal acts, and that with the knowledge that the law is hanging over their heads, and that their victims can give evidence against them; whereas, in the Slave States, provided the eye of a white man is excluded, there is scarce a limit to the torture which a savage monster may inflict upon the helpless slave, whose word cannot be received in evidence. It is as absurd to judge of the condition of the slave by visiting an amiable planter and his lady, as it would be to judge of the clothing, feeding, and comfort of our labouring population by calling at the town-house of the Duke of Well-to-do and carefully noting the worthy who fills an arm-chair like a sentry-box, and is yclept the porter. Look at him, with his hair powdered and fattened down to the head; behold him as the bell rings, using his arms as levers to force his rotundity out of its case; then observe the pedestals on which he endeavours to walk; one might imagine he had been tapped for the dropsy half-a-dozen times, and that all the water had run into the calves of his legs. Is that a type of the poorer classes?

Now the only court that a slave owner is likely to face is public opinion; and the effect that this awareness will have on their behavior is exactly the opposite of what’s needed; because the hardened individual, who most needs that influence, is often the one who, as long as they can avoid being killed, doesn’t care about public opinion. No Southerner should be offended if I say that they are not more Christian, kind-hearted, or mild-tempered than people in the Northern States, France, or England; yet we constantly see citizens in those areas showing uncontrolled emotions through brutal actions, even knowing that the law is looming over them and their victims can testify against them; while in the Slave States, as long as a white person isn’t watching, there’s hardly any limit to the suffering that a savage individual can inflict on a helpless slave, whose testimony isn’t valid in court. It’s just as ridiculous to assess the condition of a slave by visiting a friendly plantation owner and their spouse as it would be to judge the clothing, feeding, and comfort of our working class by stopping at the mansion of the wealthy Duke and carefully observing the person sitting like a statue, who is called the porter. Look at him, with his powdered hair, squished down to his head; see him as the bell rings, using his arms like levers to pull his bulk out of his seat; then notice the pedestals he tries to walk on; one might think he had been drained of fluid half a dozen times and that all the water had settled in his calves. Is that really a representation of the working class?

Where, then, are we to look for true data on which to form an opinion of the treatment of the slave?—Simply by studying human nature and weighing human passions, and then inquiring by what laws they are held in check. Now, as to the laws, they amount to nothing, inasmuch as slave evidence is not admissible, and the possibility of any oppression, even to death itself, must frequently be, without any fear of punishment, in the hands of the owner. If law, then, affords the negro no efficient protection from human passions, where are we to look for it in human nature, except it be in the influences of Christianity, self-interest, or public opinion? The last of these, we have seen, is upon a sliding-scale of an inefficiency which increases in proportion to the necessity for its influence, and is therefore all but impotent for good.

Where, then, should we look for real information to form an opinion on how slaves are treated?—Simply by studying human nature and considering human emotions, and then asking what laws keep them in check. As for the laws, they don’t amount to much since slave testimony isn’t allowed, and the potential for oppression, even to the point of death, often rests entirely in the hands of the owner without any fear of punishment. If the law doesn’t give slaves any real protection from human emotions, where can we find it in human nature, except through the influences of Christianity, self-interest, or public opinion? The last of these, as we have seen, is on a scale of inefficacy that increases as the need for its influence grows, making it nearly powerless for good.

Let us now consider self-interest. Will any one assert that self-interest is sufficient to restrain anger? How many a hasty word does man utter, or how many a hasty act does man commit, under the influence of passion he cannot or will not restrain—and that among his equals, who may be able to resent it, or in the face of law ready to avenge it! How prone are we all, if things go wrong from some fault of our own, to lose our temper and try to throw the blame on others, rather than admit the failure to be our own fault! Without dwelling upon the serious injury people often do to themselves by unrestrained passion, think for a moment of the treatment frequently inflicted upon the poor animals over whom they rule absolute. Is not kindness to a horse the interest as well as the duty of the owner? and yet how often is he the unfortunate victim of the owner's rage or cruel disposition, while faithfully and willingly expending all his powers in the service of his tyrant master! If these things be so among equals, or comparative equals, and also in man's dealings with the lower orders of the creation, what chance has the poor slave, with the arm of legislative justice paralysed, and an arm nerved with human passion his only hope of mercy?—for self-defence, that first law of nature, is the highest crime he can be guilty of: and, while considering the mercenary view of self-interest, let it not be forgotten that an awful amount of human suffering is quite compatible with unimpaired health, and that a slave may be frequently under the lash and yet fully able to do his day's work.

Let’s look at self-interest now. Can anyone really claim that self-interest is enough to keep anger in check? How many impulsive words does a person say, or how many rash actions does someone take, driven by emotions they can’t or won’t control—especially when facing others who might retaliate, or the law that’s ready to punish them! We all tend to lose our cool when things go wrong due to our own mistakes and want to pass the blame onto others instead of admitting it’s our fault! Without going into the serious harm people often inflict on themselves through uncontrolled emotions, just think for a moment about the treatment often given to the poor animals they have complete power over. Isn’t it both the owner’s interest and duty to be kind to a horse? And yet, how often does the horse become an unfortunate victim of its owner’s anger or cruelty while loyally giving its all for its oppressive master! If this is how it is among equals or those somewhat equal, what chance does a poor slave have, with the power of the law paralyzed and only a humanly passionate response as his hope for mercy?—since self-defense, that most basic law of nature, is the greatest crime he can commit: and while thinking about the self-interested view, let’s not forget that a shocking amount of human suffering can coexist with good health, and a slave can often be beaten yet still able to do his day’s work.

The last influence we have to consider is indeed the brightest and best of all—Christianity: high on the brotherly arch of man's duty to his fellow-man, and forming its enduring keystone, we read, traced by Jehovah in imperishable letters, radiant with love, "Do unto others as you would that they should do unto you;" "Love thy neighbour as thyself." Surely it needs no words of mine to show, that a faithful history of the most Christian country in the most Christian times the world ever witnessed, would contain, fearful evidence of the cruelty of man setting at nought the above blessed precept. Nay, more—I question if, viewed in its entire fulness, there is any one single command in Scripture more habitually disregarded. Proverbs are generally supposed to be a condensation of facts or experiences. Whence comes "Every one for himself, and God for us all"? or, the more vulgar one, "Go ahead, and the d----l take the hindmost?" What are they but concentrations of the fact that selfishness is man's ruling passion? What are most laws made for, but to restrain men by human penalties from a broach of the law of love? and, if these laws be needful in communities, all the members of which are equal in the eyes of the law, and even then be found inefficient for their purpose, as may be daily witnessed in every country, who will say that the influence of Christianity is sufficient protection to the poor slave?

The last influence we need to think about is definitely the brightest and best of all—Christianity: high on the supportive arch of our duty to each other, and forming its lasting keystone, we read, written by God in unchanging letters, shining with love, "Treat others the way you want to be treated;" "Love your neighbor as yourself." Surely, it needs no explanation from me to show that an honest account of the most Christian country during the most Christian times the world has ever seen would contain shocking evidence of humanity's cruelty in ignoring this blessed teaching. Furthermore, I wonder if, when viewed in its full context, there is any single command in Scripture that is more frequently overlooked. Proverbs are generally thought to be a summary of facts or experiences. Where does "Every man for himself, and God for us all" come from? Or the more common saying, "Go ahead, and let the devil take the last one?" What are they but reflections of the fact that selfishness is man's driving force? What are most laws intended for, but to restrain people with human penalties from violating the law of love? And if these laws are necessary in communities where all members are equal under the law, and are still often ineffective, as we see every day in every country, who can claim that the influence of Christianity adequately protects the poor slave?

There is only one other influence that I shall mention—that is habit; it acts for and against the slave. Thus, the kind and good, brought up among slaves, very often nursed by them, and grown up in the continual presence of their gentleness and faithfulness, repay them with unmeasured kindness, and a sympathy in all their sickness and their sorrows, to a degree which I feel quite certain the most tender-hearted Christian breathing could never equal, if landed among slaves, for the first time, at years of maturity. The Christian planter's wife or daughter may be seen sitting up at night, cooking, nursing, tending an old sick and helpless slave, with nearly, if not quite, the same affectionate care she would bestow upon a sick relation, the very friendlessness of the negro stimulating the benevolent heart. This is, indeed, the bright side of the influence of habit.—But the other side is not less true; and there the effect is, that a coarse, brutal mind, trained up among those it can bully with impunity, acquires a heartlessness and indifference to the negro's wants and sufferings, that grow with the wretched possessor's growth. This is the dark side of the influence of habit.

There’s one more influence I want to mention: habit. It can work for or against the slave. Those who are kind and good, raised among slaves and often cared for by them, tend to show them immense kindness and empathy during their illnesses and sorrows—something I’m convinced even the most compassionate Christian would struggle to match if they encountered slaves for the first time as adults. You might see a Christian plantation owner’s wife or daughter staying up at night, cooking, caring for, and attending to an elderly sick slave with nearly the same loving attention she’d give to a sick family member, motivated by the slave’s vulnerability stirring her kindness. This, indeed, represents the positive side of how habit influences behavior. However, the negative side is also true: a harsh, cruel person, raised among those they can mistreat without fear of repercussions, develops a callousness and disregard for the needs and suffering of the slaves, which only intensifies as this unfortunate individual matures. This illustrates the darker side of habit’s influence.

Let two examples suffice, both of which I have upon the very best authority. A faithful slave, having grown up with his master's rising family, obtained his freedom as a reward for his fidelity, and was entrusted with the management of the property; realizing some money, he became the owner of slaves himself, from among whom he selected his wife, and to all of whom he showed the greatest consideration. Some time after, lying upon his deathbed, he made his will, in which he bequeathed his wife and all his other negroes to his old master, giving as his reason, that, from his own lively recollections of his master's unvarying kindness to himself and the other slaves, he felt certain that in so doing he was taking the best means in his power of securing their future happiness. What stronger evidence of the growth of kindness in the master's heart could possibly be desired? Here, then, is the effect of habit in a benevolent owner.—Now, turn to the opposite picture. A lady of New Orleans was accustomed to strip and flog a slave for the pleasure of witnessing sufferings which she endeavoured to render more acute by rubbing soft soap into the broken skin. Here you have the effect of habit upon a brutal mind.

Let’s consider two examples, both of which I have from the best sources. A loyal slave, who grew up with his master’s family, earned his freedom as a reward for his loyalty and was given charge of the property. After making some money, he became a slave owner himself, from among whom he chose his wife, treating all of them with great care. Later, as he lay on his deathbed, he made a will in which he left his wife and all his other slaves to his former master, explaining that, based on his vivid memories of his master’s consistent kindness to him and the other slaves, he firmly believed he was securing their future happiness. What stronger proof of kindness developing in the master’s heart could be asked for? Here is the impact of habit on a compassionate owner. Now, let’s look at the other side. A woman in New Orleans regularly stripped and whipped a slave for the thrill of witnessing their suffering, trying to intensify the pain by rubbing soft soap into the broken skin. This shows the influence of habit on a cruel mind.

To the credit of New Orleans be it recorded, that the knowledge of this atrocity having come to white ears, her house was broken open, every article it contained pulled out in the street and burnt, and, had she not succeeded in eluding search, the she-devil would have been most assuredly reduced to ashes with her own goods. America became too hot for her, and Providence alone knows the demon's cave of concealment.

To the credit of New Orleans, it's worth noting that once white people learned about this atrocity, her house was broken into, everything inside was taken out to the street and burned, and if she hadn't managed to hide, that wicked woman would have definitely been set on fire along with her belongings. America became too dangerous for her, and only God knows where she hid.

Having thus passed in review the various influences bearing upon the treatment of the slave, and seen how utterly inadequate they are to protect him from ill-treatment, who can wonder that the tales of real or supposed cruelty inflicted upon slaves by the Southerners are received with indignation by both parties in the States?—the virtuous and kind master, indignant at the thought of being included in the category of monsters, and the real savage, if possible, still more indignant, because his conscience brings home to his seared heart the truthfulness of the picture, even if it be overdrawn almost to caricature. And here it is curious to observe the different action of these two parties: the former, in the consciousness of a kind heart and a real desire for the negro's good, calmly states what has been done and is doing for the negro, and throws a natural veil of doubt over horrors so utterly repulsive to the feelings that their existence is discredited; the latter, with a shallowness which Providence sometimes attaches to guilt, aware that some such accusations come too painfully and truthfully home, pronounce their own condemnation by their line of defence—recrimination.

Having reviewed the various influences affecting the treatment of slaves and seen how completely inadequate they are to protect them from mistreatment, who can be surprised that stories of actual or alleged cruelty inflicted on slaves by Southerners are met with outrage by both sides in the States?—the virtuous and kind master, outraged at the thought of being grouped with monsters, and the truly savage, even more outraged, because their conscience reflects the painful truth of the situation, even if it’s exaggerated to the point of caricature. It's interesting to see how these two groups react differently: the first, confident of their kind nature and genuine concern for the well-being of Black people, calmly outlines what has been done and continues to be done for them, casting a natural doubt over horrors that are too repulsive to accept, while the second, with a superficiality that guilt sometimes brings, knowing that some accusations strike too close to home, essentially condemns themselves with their defensive tactics—recrimination.

Take, for example, the following extract from an article in a Slave State paper, entitled "A Sequel to Uncle Tom's Cabin," and in which Queen Victoria, under the guidance of a "genius," has the condition of her subjects laid bare before her. After various other paragraphs of a similar nature comes the following:—

Take, for instance, this excerpt from an article in a Slave State paper called "A Sequel to Uncle Tom's Cabin," where Queen Victoria, led by a "genius," has the situation of her subjects revealed to her. After several other paragraphs of a similar theme, we have the following:—

"The sky was obscured by the smoke of hundreds of small chimneys and vast edifices, stretching in lines for miles and miles. The latter were crowded with women and children, young in years, but withered in form and feature. The countenances of the men were as colourless as the white fabric in their looms; their eyes sparkled with intelligence, but it was chiefly the intelligence of suffering, of privation, of keen sense of wrong, of inability to be better, of rankling hatred against existing institutions, and a furtive wish that some hideous calamity would bury them all in one common, undistinguishable ruin.

"The sky was thick with smoke from hundreds of small chimneys and huge buildings stretching for miles. These places were packed with women and children who were young but looked worn and fragile. The men’s faces were as pale as the white fabric in their looms; their eyes shone with a sharp intelligence, though it mostly reflected their suffering, deprivation, deep sense of injustice, frustration at their circumstances, and a smoldering resentment towards the current system, along with a secret desire for some dreadful disaster to engulf them all in a shared, unrecognizable ruin."

"'Are these the people? groaned the Queen, as the cold damp of more than mortal agony moistened her marble forehead.

"'Are these the people?' groaned the Queen, as the cold damp of more than human agony dampened her marble forehead.

"'Not all of them!" sounded the voice in her ear, so sharply that her Majesty looked up eagerly, and saw written, in letters of fire, on the palace wall:—

"'Not all of them!" echoed the voice in her ear, so sharply that her Majesty looked up eagerly and saw written in letters of fire on the palace wall:—

"'1. Every twelfth person in your dominions is a pauper, daily receiving parochial relief.

"'1. Every twelfth person in your territories is a poor person, receiving local support every day.

"'2. Every twentieth person in your dominions is a destitute wanderer, with no roof but the sky—no home but a prison. They are the Ishmaelites of modern society; every one's hand is against them, and their hands are against every one.

"'2. Every twentieth person in your realm is a homeless wanderer, with nothing but the sky over their head—no home except a prison. They are the outcasts of today’s society; everyone is against them, and they are against everyone."

"'3. There are in Freeland 10,743,747 females; divide that number by 500,000, and you will find that every twentieth woman in your dominions is—Oh! horror piled on horror!--a harlot!'"

"'3. There are 10,743,747 women in Freeland; divide that number by 500,000, and you'll discover that every twentieth woman in your lands is—Oh! horror upon horror!—a prostitute!'"

Then follows the scene of a disconsolate female throwing herself over a bridge, the whole winding up with this charming piece of information, addressed by the genius to her Majesty:—

Then comes the scene of a heartbroken woman throwing herself off a bridge, and it all wraps up with this delightful bit of information, directed by the genius to her Majesty:—

"In your own land, liberty, the absence of which in another is deplored, is, in its most god-like development, but a name—unless that may be termed liberty which practically is but vulgar license—license to work from rosy morn to dark midnight for the most scanty pittances—license to store up wealth in the hands and for the benefit of the few—license to bellow lustily for rival politicians—license to send children to ragged schools—license to sot in the ale-house—license to grow lumpish and brutal—license to neglect the offices of religion, to swear, to lie, to blaspheme—license to steal, to pander unchecked to the coarsest appetites, to fawn and slaver over the little great ones of the earth—license to creep like a worm through life, or bound through it like a wild beast; and, last and most precious of all—for it is untaxed—license to starve, to rot, to die, and be buried in a foetid pauper's grave, on which the sweet-smelling flowers, sent to strew the pathway of man and woman with beauty, love, and hope, will refuse to grow, much less bloom."

"In your own country, freedom, which is sadly missing in others, is, at its highest form, just a name—unless what is called freedom is really just a kind of common license—license to work from early morning to late at night for barely enough pay—license to accumulate wealth in the hands of a few—license to shout for competing politicians—license to send children to rundown schools—license to loaf in the pub—license to become dull and brutal—license to ignore the duties of religion, to curse, to lie, to blaspheme—license to steal, to cater to the basest desires, to grovel and flatter the so-called powerful—license to crawl through life like a worm or to charge through it like a wild animal; and, last and most valuable of all—for it comes with no tax—license to starve, to decay, to die, and be buried in a rotten pauper's grave, where the beautiful flowers meant to bring joy, love, and hope to people's lives will refuse to grow, much less bloom."

Setting aside all exaggerations, who does not recognise in the foregoing quotations "the galled jade wincing"? Were the writer a kind owner of slaves, he might have replied to Uncle Tom's Cabin by facts of habitual kindness to them, sufficient to prove that the authoress had entered into the region of romance; but in his recrimination he unconsciously displays the cloven hoof, and leaves no doubt on the mind that he writes under the impulse of a bitterly-accusing monitor within. It would be wasting time to point out the difference between a system which binds millions of its people in bondage to their fellow-man, a master's sovereign will their only practical protection, and a system which not only makes all its subjects equal in the eye of the law, and free to seek their fortunes wherever they list, but which is for ever striving to mitigate the distress that is invariably attendant upon an overcrowded population. Even granting that his assertions were not only true, but that they were entirely produced by tyrannical enactments, what justification would England's sins be for America's crimes? Suppose the House of Commons and the Lords Temporal and Spiritual obtained the royal sanction to an act for kidnapping boys and grilling them daily for a table-d'hôte in their respective legislative assemblies, would such an atrocity—or any worse atrocity, if such be possible—in any respect alter the question of right and wrong between master and slave? Let any charge of cruelty or injustice in England be advanced on its own simple grounds, and, wherever it comes from, it will find plenty of people, I am proud and happy to say, ready to inquire into it and to work hard for its removal; but when it comes in the shape of recrimination, who can fail to recognise an accusing conscience striving to throw the cloak of other people's sins over the abominations which that conscience is ever ringing in the writer's ears at home.

Setting aside all exaggerations, who doesn’t see the "hurt horse cringing" in the previous quotes? If the writer were a kind slave owner, he might have responded to Uncle Tom's Cabin with examples of his habitual kindness, enough to show that the author had entered the realm of fantasy; but in his accusations, he unknowingly reveals his true self and makes it clear that he writes under the pressure of a deeply critical inner voice. It would be pointless to highlight the difference between a system that enslaves millions, with a master’s will as their only practical safety, and a system that makes all its citizens equal under the law, free to pursue their fortunes wherever they wish, and continuously works to ease the suffering that inevitably comes with a crowded population. Even if we were to accept that his claims were true and caused by oppressive laws, how would England’s wrongs justify America’s crimes? Imagine if the House of Commons and the Lords, both Temporal and Spiritual, got the king’s approval to pass a law for kidnapping boys and cooking them for a communal meal in their legislative meetings—would such a horror, or any worse atrocity, change the moral issues at play between master and slave? If any accusation of cruelty or injustice in England is raised on its own merits, regardless of its source, there will be many, and I am proud and happy to say so, eager to investigate and work towards fixing it; but when it appears as retaliation, who can ignore the guilty conscience trying to hide its own sins under the weight of others’ wrongdoings that echo loudly in the writer's mind at home?

I must, however, state that, in speaking of the sufferings or injuries to which the slave is liable, I am not proclaiming them merely on the authority of Northern abolitionists, or on the deductions which I have drawn from human nature; many travellers have made similar charges. Miss Bremer writes:—"I beheld the old slave hunted to death because he dared to visit his wife—beheld him mangled, beaten, recaptured, fling himself into the water of the Black River, over which he was retaken into the power of his hard master—and the law was silent. I beheld a young woman struck, for a hasty word, upon the temples, so that she fell down dead!--and the law was silent. I heard the law, through its jury, adjudicate between a white man and a black, and sentence the latter to be flogged when the former was guilty—and they who were honest among the jurymen in vain opposed the verdict. I beheld here on the shores of the Mississippi, only a few months since, a young negro girl fly from the maltreatment of her master, and he was a professor of religion, and fling herself into the river."—Homes of the New World. Would Miss Bremer write these things for the press, as occurring under her own eye, if they were not true?

I have to say that when I talk about the suffering or harm that slaves endure, I’m not just echoing the views of Northern abolitionists or drawing conclusions from human nature; many travelers have made similar observations. Miss Bremer writes:—"I saw an old slave hunted to death for daring to visit his wife—saw him beaten, recaptured, and then throw himself into the water of the Black River, only to be taken back into the grasp of his cruel master—and the law said nothing. I saw a young woman hit in the head for a hasty word, causing her to drop dead!—and the law was silent. I heard the law, through its jury, rule between a white man and a black one, sentencing the latter to be whipped even though the former was guilty—and those who were honest among the jurors could do nothing to stop the verdict. Just a few months ago, right here on the shores of the Mississippi, I saw a young black girl run away from her master’s abuse, and he was a supposed religious man, before throwing herself into the river."—Homes of the New World. Would Miss Bremer write these things for the public, claiming to witness them herself, if they weren’t true?

Then, again, the Press itself in the South bears witness to what every one must admit to be an inhuman practice. How often must the reader of a Southern States' paper see children of the tenderest age, sometimes even under a year old, advertised for public sale! Did any one every take up the New Orleans paper without seeing more than one such advertisement as the following?—

Then again, the press in the South shows what everyone has to acknowledge is a cruel practice. How often does someone reading a Southern States newspaper encounter children at very young ages, sometimes even under a year old, advertised for public sale? Has anyone ever picked up a New Orleans paper without noticing at least one advertisement like the following?—

150 Black people for sale.

Just arrived and for sale at my old spot, No. 7, Moreau Street,

Third Municipality, one hundred and fifty young and promising BLACK INDIVIDUALS,

made up of field workers, household staff, and tradespeople. They will be

sold on reasonable terms for good paper or cash. People wanting to

Anyone looking to purchase will benefit from giving me a call. [Sep.

30—6m.] Wm. F. TALBOTT.

What happiness can the slave enjoy among a community where such an advertisement as the following can be tolerated, or, worse still, when, as in the present instance, it is sent forth under the sanction of the law? The advertisement is taken from a paper published at Wilmington, North Carolina.

What happiness can a slave have in a community where an advertisement like this can be accepted, or, even worse, when it is issued with the approval of the law? This advertisement is from a newspaper published in Wilmington, North Carolina.

$225 REWARD.—STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NEW HANOVER COUNTY.—Whereas,

A complaint has been made to us today, and an oath has been taken by both of the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

Justices of the Peace for the State and County mentioned above, by BENJAMIN

HALLET, from the mentioned county, that two specific male slaves owned by

him, named LOTT, around twenty-two years old, five feet four or five inches tall

inches high and black, previously owned by LOTT WILLIAMS of Onslow

county; and BOB, around sixteen years old, five feet tall, and black;

have been absent from their master's service, and are

supposed to be hiding around this county, committing crimes

and other wrongdoings. These are, therefore, on behalf of the State

aforementioned, to instruct the slaves immediately to go back home to their

masters; and we hereby, by the authority of the Act of the General

In such cases, it is established and stated that

If LOTT and BOB do not come home and turn themselves in right after this document is published, then

ANY PERSON MAY KILL AND DESTROY THE SAID SLAVES, by any means he

or they may see fit, without any accusation or charge of a crime

or offense for doing so, and without facing any penalty or

forfeiture as a result.

Signed and sealed by us, this 28th day of February, 1853.

W.N. PEDEN, J.P., [Seal]

W.C. BETTENCOURT, J.P., [Seal.]

$225 REWARD.—$200 will be offered for the capture of the Black man LOTT, EITHER

DEAD OR ALIVE; and $25 FOR BOB'S HEAD, delivered to

the subscriber in Wilmington.

BENJAMIN HALLET.

March 2, 1853.

There is another evidence of a want of happiness among the slaves, which, though silent and unheard, challenges contradiction: I mean the annual escape of from one to two thousand into Canada, in spite not only of the natural difficulties and privations of the journey, but also of the fearful dread of the consequences of re-capture. Doubtless some of these may be fleeing from the dread of just punishment for offences against the law, but none can doubt that many more are endeavouring to escape from what they feel to be cruelty, injustice, and oppression.

There’s another sign of unhappiness among the slaves that, although quiet and unnoticed, speaks for itself: the annual escape of one to two thousand people into Canada, despite the natural challenges and hardships of the journey, as well as the terrifying fear of being recaptured. While some may be trying to escape the fear of punishment for breaking the law, there’s no doubt that many more are trying to flee from what they perceive as cruelty, injustice, and oppression.

I do not wish to pander to a morbid appetite for horrors by gathering together under one view all the various tales of woe and misery which I have heard of, known, or seen. I think I have said enough to prove to any unprejudiced person that such things do and must ever exist under the institution of slavery; and that, although the statements of rabid abolitionists are often the most unwarranted exaggerations, the all but total denial of their occurrence by the slave-owners is also not correct. The conviction forced upon my own mind, after much thought and inquiry on this most interesting topic is, that there are many dark clouds of cruelty in a sky which is bright with much of the truest and kindest sympathy for the poor slave.

I don't want to cater to a morbid curiosity for horrors by compiling all the different stories of pain and suffering I've heard, known, or witnessed. I believe I've said enough to show any fair-minded person that such things do exist and will always exist under the system of slavery; and that, while the claims of extreme abolitionists are often grossly exaggerated, the near-total denial of these occurrences by slave owners is also inaccurate. The conclusion I've come to after a lot of thought and inquiry on this fascinating topic is that there are many dark clouds of cruelty in a sky that is otherwise filled with genuine and compassionate sympathy for the suffering slave.

I now propose to take a short review of the progress and real state of slavery, and I will commence by giving in extenso an enactment which materially affects the negro, and, as I have before observed, has more than once threatened the Republic with disunion:—

I now suggest taking a brief look at the progress and current status of slavery, and I will start by providing in extenso a law that significantly impacts Black people and, as I have mentioned before, has repeatedly posed a threat of disunion to the Republic:—

Section 2.—Privileges of Citizens.—Clause 3. "No person held to service or labour in one state under the laws thereof, escaping to another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein be discharged from such service or labour, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labour may be due."

Section 2.—Privileges of Citizens.—Clause 3. "No person who is required to work or serve in one state will be released from that obligation when they escape to another state due to any law or regulation there. Instead, they must be returned to the person to whom that work or service is owed upon request."

Of course the word "slave" would have read strangely among a community who set themselves up as the champions of the "equal rights of man;" but it is clear that, according to this clause in the constitution which binds the Republic together, every free state is compelled to assist in the recapture of a fugitive slave.

Of course, the word "slave" would have sounded odd in a community that considered itself the advocate for the "equal rights of man;" but it’s clear that, based on this clause in the constitution that holds the Republic together, every free state is required to help in the recapture of a runaway slave.

What was the exact number of slaves at the date of this law being passed I have not the means of ascertaining: at the beginning of this century it was under 900,000; in the Census of 1850 they had increased to 3,200,000.[BT] There were originally 13 States. At present there are 31, besides territory not yet incorporated into States. The Slave States are 15, or nearly half. Thus much for increase of slaves and the slave soil. But, it will naturally be asked, how did it happen that, as the additional soil was incorporated, the sable workmen appeared as if by magic? The answer is very simple. The demand regulated the supply, and slave breeding became a most important feature in the system: thus the wants of the more southern States became regularly lessened by large drafts from Maryland, Kentucky, and Virginia. Anybody desirous of testing the truth of this statement will find statistical data to assist him in an unpretending volume by Marshall Hall, M.D., &c., On Twofold Slavery, which I read with much interest, although I cannot agree with him in everything.[BV]

I don’t have the exact number of slaves when this law was passed, but at the start of this century, it was under 900,000; by the 1850 Census, it had risen to 3,200,000.[BT] There were originally 13 States. Now, there are 31, plus territories that haven't become states yet. The Slave States number 15, which is nearly half. This shows the increase in slaves and slave territory. But it raises the question: how did it happen that as new land was added, more slaves seemed to appear out of nowhere? The answer is straightforward. The demand influenced the supply, and slave breeding became a key part of the system: thus, the needs of the more southern States were consistently met by significant transfers from Maryland, Kentucky, and Virginia. Anyone curious about the accuracy of this statement can find statistical data in a straightforward book by Marshall Hall, M.D., titled On Twofold Slavery, which I found very interesting, though I don’t agree with him on everything.[BV]

I am aware that residents in these breeding States are to be found who would scorn to utter a wilful falsehood, and who deny this propagation of the human chattel for the flesh market; but there can be little doubt that the unbiased seeker after truth will find that such is the case. And why not? Why should those who make their livelihood by trafficking in the flesh of their fellow-creatures hesitate to increase their profits by paying attention to the breeding of them? These facts do not come under the general traveller's eye, because, armed with letters of introduction, he consorts more with worthy slave-owners, who, occupied with the welfare of those around and dependent upon them, know little of the world beyond; in the same way as in England, a Christian family may be an example of patriarchal simplicity and of apostolic zeal and love, and yet beyond the circle of their action, though not very far from its circumference, the greatest distress and perhaps cruelty may abound. How many of the dark spots on our community has the single zeal of the Earl of Shaftesbury forced upon the public mind, of which we were utterly ignorant, though living in the midst of them. The degraded female drudge in a coal-pit, the agonized infant in a chimney, and the death-wrought child in a factory—each and all bear testimony to how much of suffering may exist while surrounded by those whose lives are spent in Christian charity. And so it is in every community, Slave States included. Christian hearts, pregnant with zeal and love, are diffusing blessings around them; and, occupied with their noble work, they know little of the dark places that hang on their borders. The Southern planter and his lady may be filled with the love of St. John, and radiate the beams thereof on every man, woman, and child under their guardianship, and then, "measuring other people's corn by their own lovely bushel," they may well hesitate to believe in the existence of a profligate breeding Pandemonium within the precincts of their immediate country. Yet, alas! there can be little doubt that it does exist.

I know there are people in these breeding States who would never lie intentionally and who reject the idea of human trafficking for the flesh market; but it’s clear that anyone genuinely looking for the truth will discover the reality of the situation. And why shouldn’t they? Those who make a living selling the bodies of others would naturally want to maximize their profits by investing in breeding them. These truths often go unnoticed by the average traveler because they usually associate with respectable slave owners, who are focused on the well-being of those around them and know little about the world outside their immediate circle; similarly, in England, a Christian family might embody simplicity and genuine love while, outside their close-knit community, suffering and cruelty can be widespread. How many hidden issues in our society have been brought to light by the passionate efforts of the Earl of Shaftesbury, revealing hardships we were completely unaware of despite living right among them? The exploited woman in a coal mine, the suffering infant in a chimney, and the overworked child in a factory—each highlight the extent of suffering that can exist even in the midst of those who dedicate their lives to charity. This is true in every community, including Slave States. Dedicated Christian hearts are spreading kindness around them; however, consumed by their important work, they know little about the darker realities lurking on their outskirts. The Southern planter and his wife may be filled with love and share that love with everyone under their care, and yet, “measuring others by their own standards of kindness,” they may find it hard to believe there’s a breeding ground of exploitation within their own region. Yet, unfortunately, there’s little doubt that it does exist.

Let us now fix our attention on the actual facts of the case which all parties admit. First, we have a slave population of 3,200,000. I think, if I estimate their marketable value at 80l a head, I shall be considerably below the truth. That gives us in human flesh, 250,000,000l. Secondly, let us take the product of their labour. The Slave States raise annually—

Let’s focus on the actual facts of the case that everyone agrees on. First, there’s a slave population of 3,200,000. If I estimate their market value at 80l each, I’m probably underestimating. That totals to 250,000,000l in human value. Next, let’s consider the output of their labor. The Slave States produce every year—

    Rice             215,000,000 lbs.
    Tobacco          185,000,000  "
    Sugar            248,000,000  "
    Cotton         1,000,000,000  "
    Molasses          12,000,000 gallons.
    Indian Corn.     368,000,000 bushels.

Estimating these at a lower value than they have ever fallen to, you have here represented 80,000,000l. sterling of annual produce from the muscle and sinew of the slave.[BW] Surely the wildest enthusiast, did he but ponder over these facts, could not fail to pause ere he mounted the breach, shouting the rabid war-cry of abolition, which involves a capital of 250,000,000l, and an annual produce of 80,000,000l.

Estimating these at a lower value than they have ever reached, you represent here 80,000,000l sterling in annual output from the labor of slaves.[BW] Surely, the most passionate supporter of abolition, if he took a moment to reflect on these facts, would hesitate before rushing into battle, shouting the fervent cry for abolition, which entails a total of 250,000,000l and an annual yield of 80,000,000l.

The misery which an instantaneous deliverance of the slave would cause by the all but certain loss of the greater portion of the products above enumerated, must be apparent to the least reflecting mind. If any such schemer exist, he would do well to study the history of our West India islands from the period of their sudden emancipation, especially since free-trade admitted slave produce on equal terms with the produce of free labour. Complaints of utter ruin are loud and constant from the proprietors in nearly every island; they state, and state with truth, that it is impossible for free labour at a high price, and which can only be got perhaps for six hours a day, to compete with the steady slave work of twelve hours a day; and they show that slaveholding communities have materially increased their products, which can only have been effected by a further taxing of the slave's powers, or a vast increase of fresh human material.[BX] But they further complain that the negro himself is sadly retrograding. "They attend less to the instruction of their religious teachers; they pay less attention to the education of their children; vice and immorality are on the increase," &c.—Petition to the Imperial Parliament from St. George's, Jamaica, July, 1852.

The suffering that would result from an immediate release of the slaves, due to the almost guaranteed loss of most of the mentioned products, should be obvious to anyone who thinks about it. If there are any planners out there, they should really look into the history of our West India islands after their sudden emancipation, especially since free trade allowed slave-produced goods to compete on equal terms with products from free labor. The complaints of complete devastation are loud and frequent from landowners in nearly every island; they claim, and rightly so, that it’s impossible for free labor, which is only available for maybe six hours a day and at a high cost, to compete with the consistent labor of slaves working twelve hours a day. They also point out that slaveholding communities have significantly increased their output, which can only be due to either pushing the slaves harder or bringing in a significant number of new slaves.[BX] Additionally, they further lament that the enslaved people are sadly regressing. "They are less attentive to their religious teachers; they are less focused on educating their children; vice and immorality are on the rise," etc.—Petition to the Imperial Parliament from St. George's, Jamaica, July, 1852.

I might multiply such statements from nearly every island, and quote the authority of even some of their governors to the same effect; but the above are sufficient for my purpose. They prove three most important facts for consideration, when treating the question of Slavery. First, that you may ruin the planter. Secondly, that you may free—without benefiting—the slave. Thirdly, that each State, as it becomes free, tends to give additional value to the property of those States which choose to hold on to slavery; and all these results may occur despite the wisdom (?) of senators, and an indemnity of 20,000,000l.

I could share similar statements from almost every island and even quote some of their governors to back this up, but the ones above are enough for my point. They highlight three important facts to consider when discussing the issue of slavery. First, you can destroy the planter. Second, you can free the slave without actually helping them. Third, as each state becomes free, it tends to increase the value of the property in states that decide to keep slavery; and all of these outcomes can happen regardless of the wisdom of senators and a compensation of 20,000,000l.

Surely, then, the Southern planter may well assert that he sees not sufficient inducement to follow our hasty wholesale example. But while such convictions are forced upon him, he will be a degenerate son of energetic sires, if he be so scared at our ill-success as to fear to look for some better path to the same noble object; and there is one most important consideration which should impel him, while avoiding all rash haste, to brook no dangerous delay; that consideration is, that the difficulty of dealing with the question is increasing with fearful rapidity, for the slave population has nearly quadrupled itself since the beginning of the century. The capital involved is, we have seen, gigantic; but the question of numbers is by far the most perplexing to deal with, in a social point of view. The white population of the Slave States is, in rough numbers, 6,000,000; the slave population is more than 3,000,000, and the free blacks 250,000. Does any sane man believe that, if slavery had existed in Great Britain, and that the slaves had constituted one-third of the population, we should have attempted to remove the black bar from our escutcheon, by the same rapid and summary process which we adopted to free the negro in our colonies?

Surely, the Southern planter can confidently say that he doesn't see enough reason to follow our quick, sweeping example. But while these beliefs weigh on him, he would be a disappointment, given his energetic heritage, if he is so deterred by our failures that he is afraid to seek a better way to reach the same noble goal; and there is one very important factor that should encourage him, while avoiding any reckless haste, to not tolerate any dangerous delay; that factor is that the challenge of addressing the issue is growing at an alarming rate, as the number of enslaved people has nearly quadrupled since the start of the century. The financial stakes are enormous, as we've seen, but the issue of numbers is by far the most challenging to tackle from a social perspective. The white population in the Slave States is around 6,000,000; the enslaved population is over 3,000,000, and there are 250,000 free Black individuals. Does any rational person believe that if slavery had existed in Great Britain and the enslaved made up one-third of the population, we would have tried to remove the black mark from our reputation using the same quick and straightforward method that we used to free the enslaved in our colonies?

An American writer on Slavery has said, and I think most justly, "that two distinct races of people, nearly equal in numbers, and unlike in colour, manners, habits, feelings and state of civilization to such a degree that amalgamation is impossible, cannot dwell together in the same community unless the one be in subjection to the other." So fully am I convinced of the truth of this statement, and so certain am I that every one who has been in a Slave State must be satisfied of the truth of it, that I feel sure, if the South freed every slave to-morrow, not a week would elapse before each State in the Union without exception would pass stringent laws to prevent them settling within their borders; even at this moment such a law exists in some States.

An American writer on slavery once said, and I believe it’s accurate, "that two different races of people, nearly equal in numbers, and differing in color, customs, habits, emotions, and levels of civilization to such an extent that mixing is impossible, cannot live together in the same community unless one is subservient to the other." I am so convinced of the truth of this statement, and so certain that anyone who has been in a slave state must recognize its validity, that I am sure if the South freed every slave tomorrow, not even a week would pass before every state in the Union would implement strict laws to prevent them from settling within their borders; even now, such laws exist in some states.

With all these difficulties constantly before them, who can wonder that a kind-hearted planter, while gazing on the cheerful and happy faces of his well-fed and well-housed slaves, should look distrustfully at emancipation, and strive to justify to his conscience opposition to any plan, however gradual, which leads thereto. Nevertheless, however satisfied in his mind that the slaves are kindly treated, and that harshness even is never used, he cannot contemplate the institution from a sufficient distance to be beyond its influences, without feeling that emancipation is the goal towards which his thoughts should ever bend, and that in proportion as the steps towards it must be gradual, so should they speedily commence. But how? Washington, while confessing his most earnest desire for abolition, declares his conviction that "it can only be effected by legislative authority."

With all these challenges constantly in front of them, who can blame a compassionate plantation owner for looking skeptically at emancipation while watching the cheerful and happy faces of his well-fed and well-housed slaves? He might try to rationalize his opposition to any plan, no matter how gradual, that leads to it. Still, even if he's convinced in his mind that the slaves are treated well and that no cruelty is ever used, he can't view the institution from a sufficient distance to escape its effects without feeling that emancipation should always be his ultimate goal. He knows that, as the steps toward it need to be gradual, they should also start soon. But how? Washington, while admitting his deep desire for abolition, states his belief that "it can only be effected by legislative authority."

The next chapter will detail such propositions as, in my humble opinion, appear most worthy of the consideration of the Legislature, with a view to the gradual removal of the black star from the striped banner.

The next chapter will outline the ideas that, in my opinion, deserve the Legislature's attention, aimed at gradually removing the black star from the striped banner.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

List of States and Territories forming the Confederation. Those marked S. are Slave-holding States. STATES.
New Hampshire
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
Connecticut
NYC
New Jersey __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Pennsylvania
S. Delaware
S. Maryland
South Virginia
S. North Carolina
S. Carolina
South Georgia
NEW STATES.
   Vermont         1791  
S. Kentucky        1792  
S. Tennessee       1796  
   Ohio            1802  
S. Louisiana       1812  
   Indiana         1816  
S. Mississippi     1817  
   Illinois        1818  
S. Alabama         1819  
   Maine           1820  
S. Missouri        1821  
S. Arkansas        1836  
   Michigan        1837  
S. Florida         1845  
S. Texas           1845  
   Iowa            1846  
   Wisconsin       1848  
   California      1850  
DISTRICT.
S. Columbia         1791
TERRITORIES.
   Oregon          1848  
   Minnesota       1849  
S. Kansas          1855  
S. Utah            1850  
   New Mexico      1850  
   Nebraska        1853  
I believe the last slave has been removed from New Jersey.—H.A.M.


Between 1810 and 1850 the slave population in Virginia has only increased from 392,000 to 470,000, while in Tennessee it has increased from 44,000 to 240,000; and in Louisiana, from 35,000 to 240,000.


I take no notice of the various other valuable productions of these States: they may fairly represent the produce of the white man's labour.


Vide ch. xii., "The Queen of the Antilles."



CHAPTER XXVI.

Hints for Master—Hopes for Slave.




I will now suggest certain proposals,[BY] in the hope that while they can do no harm, they may by chance lead to some good result. The first proposal is a very old one, and only made by me now, because I consider it of primary importance—I mean a "Free-Soil" bill. I advocate it upon two distinct grounds—the one affecting the Republic, the other the slave. The Republic sanctions and carries on the slave-trade by introducing the institution into land hitherto free, and the slave throughout the Union has his fetters tightened by the enhancement of his value; but the great Channing has so fully and ably argued the truth of these evils, when treating of the annexation of Texas, that none but the wilfully blind can fail to be convinced; in short, if Slavery is to be introduced into land hitherto free, it is perhaps questionable if it be not better to send for the ill-used and degraded slave from Africa, and leave the more elevated slave in his comparatively happy home in the Old Slave States; the plea may be used for bettering the condition of the former, but that plea cannot be used for the latter.

I’m going to suggest a few proposals,[BY] hoping that, while they won’t cause any harm, they might lead to a positive outcome. The first proposal is an old one, but I’m bringing it up now because I think it's really important—I'm talking about a "Free-Soil" bill. I support this for two main reasons—one is about the country, and the other is about the slaves. The country allows and continues the slave trade by bringing this institution into lands that were previously free, and as a result, the slaves across the nation are suffering more as their value increases. The great Channing has thoroughly and effectively argued against these issues, especially when discussing the annexation of Texas, so only those who refuse to see can deny it; in short, if slavery is to be brought into lands that were free before, it’s probably better to bring the mistreated and oppressed slaves from Africa, instead of keeping the more privileged slaves in their relatively better lives in the Old Slave States; you can argue that this would improve the situation for the former, but that argument doesn’t apply to the latter.

The next proposal is one which, if it came from the South, would, I suppose, have the support of all the kind masters in those States, and most assuredly would find no opposition in the North,—I mean the expulsion from the Constitution of that law by which fugitive slaves are forced to be given up. If the proposal came from the North, it would naturally excite ill-feeling in the South, after all the angry passions which abolition crusading has set in action; but the South might easily propose it: and when we see the accounts of the affectionate attachment of the slaves to their masters, and of the kindness with which they are treated, in proportion, as such statements are correct, so will it follow as a consequence, that none but those who are driven to it by cruelty will wish to leave their snug homes and families, to seek for peace in the chilly winters of the North. And surely the slaves who are victims of cruelty, every kind-hearted slave-master would rejoice to see escaping; it would only be the compulsory giving up of fugitives, except for criminal offences, which would be expunged; each individual State would be able, if desirous, to enter into any mutual arrangement with any other State, according to their respective necessities. This proposal has two advantages: one, that it removes a bone of bitter contention ever ready to be thrown down between the North and the South; and the other, that it opens a small loophole for the oppressed to escape from the oppressor.

The next proposal is one that, if it came from the South, I believe would have the support of all the kind masters in those states and would definitely meet no opposition in the North. I mean the removal from the Constitution of the law that requires fugitive slaves to be returned. If this proposal came from the North, it would naturally stir up anger in the South, given all the heated emotions that the abolition movement has caused; however, the South could easily propose it. When we see reports of the strong bonds between slaves and their masters, and the kindness with which they are treated, it follows that only those driven to leave by cruelty would want to abandon their comfortable homes and families to look for peace in the cold winters of the North. Surely, any kind-hearted slave owner would be glad to see cruelly treated slaves escape; it would only be the mandated return of fugitives, except in cases of criminal offenses, that would be removed. Each state would be able, if they wished, to enter into any mutual agreements with other states based on their needs. This proposal has two benefits: first, it eliminates a source of ongoing conflict between the North and the South, and second, it provides a small opportunity for the oppressed to escape from their oppressors.

The next proposal I have to make, is one which, as every year makes it more difficult, merits immediate attention,—and that is, the providing a territory of refuge. No one for a moment can doubt that the foundation of Liberia was an act of truly philanthropic intent, reflecting credit upon all parties concerned in it; but it must, I fear, be acknowledged that it is totally unequal to the object in view. No further evidence of this need he adduced, than the simple fact, that, for every negro sent to Liberia, nearer twenty than ten are born in the States. Dame Partington's effort to sweep back the incoming tide with a hair-broom promised better hopes of success; a brigade of energetic firemen would drain off Lake Superior in a much shorter space of time than Liberian colonization would remove one-third of the slave population. The scheme is in the right direction, but as insufficient to overcome the difficulty as a popgun is to breach a fortified city; the only method of effectually enabling the system of colonization to be carried out, is—in my humble opinion—by setting apart some portion of the unoccupied territory of the Union as a negro colony. In making the selection, a suitable climate should be considered, in justice to the health of the negro, as it is clear, from the fate of those who fly from persecution to Canada, that they are unable to resist cold; and proximity to the ocean is desirable, as affording a cheap conveyance for those who become manumitted: the expense of a passage to Liberia is one great obstacle to its utility.

The next proposal I need to put forward is one that deserves urgent attention as it's becoming more challenging each year—and that is creating a territory for refuge. No one can doubt that founding Liberia was a genuinely philanthropic act, reflecting positively on everyone involved; however, I fear we must acknowledge that it falls significantly short of its intended purpose. There’s no need for further proof than the fact that for every Black person sent to Liberia, closer to twenty are born in the States. Dame Partington’s attempt to push back the incoming tide with a hair broom would have more promising results; a group of dedicated firefighters could drain Lake Superior in a much shorter time than Liberian colonization would take to relocate even a third of the enslaved population. The idea is headed in the right direction, but it’s as ineffective at solving the problem as a pop gun is at breaching a fortified city. In my humble opinion, the only viable way to effectively implement colonization is by designating a portion of the unoccupied land in the Union as a Black colony. When choosing a location, it's important to consider a suitable climate for the health of Black people since it’s clear from the experiences of those who escape persecution to Canada that they struggle to withstand the cold. Being near the ocean is also beneficial, as it provides an affordable way for those who gain their freedom to travel; the cost of a ticket to Liberia is a major barrier to its practicality.

The quantity of land required for such a purpose would be very small; and stringent regulations as to the negro leaving the territory so granted, would effectually prevent any inconvenience to the neighbouring States. I have before shown that the comparative number of whites and blacks—whites 6,000,000, and blacks 3,000,000—renders it all but, if not quite, impossible for the two races to live together free. I have also shown that the Northern States either refuse to admit them, or pass such laws respecting them, that slavery under a good master is a paradise by comparison. I have further shown that Liberia is, from its distance, so expensive for their removal, as to be of but little assistance, and Canada too often proves an early grave. If, then, these difficulties present themselves with a population of 3,000,000 slaves, and if they are increasing their numbers rapidly—which statistics fully prove to be the case—it is clear that these difficulties must augment in a corresponding ratio, until at last they will become insurmountable. I therefore come to the conclusion, either that territory must be set apart in America itself for the negro's home, or that the black bar of slavery must deface the escutcheon of the Republic for ever.

The amount of land needed for this purpose would be very small, and strict rules regarding the movement of Black individuals from the assigned territory would effectively prevent any issues for neighboring states. I've previously shown that the ratio of whites to Blacks—6,000,000 whites and 3,000,000 Blacks—makes it almost, if not entirely, impossible for the two races to coexist freely. I've also indicated that the Northern states either refuse to accept them or enact laws that make slavery under a good master seem like a paradise in comparison. Furthermore, I've shown that relocating them to Liberia is too costly due to its distance, and Canada often turns out to be a dead end. Given these challenges, particularly with a population of 3,000,000 enslaved individuals who are rapidly increasing in number—something statistics clearly demonstrate—it’s evident that these challenges will only grow until they become unmanageable. Therefore, I conclude that either land must be designated in America itself for Black people to call home, or the stain of slavery will forever tarnish the reputation of the Republic.

I now propose to make a few remarks on the treatment of slaves. As to the nature of that treatment, I have already given my calm and unbiased opinion. My present observations refer to corporal punishment, and the implements for the infliction thereof. Of the latter I have seen four; of course there may be many others; I speak only of those that have come under my own eye. The four I have seen are first, the common hunting-whip, which is too well known to require description. Secondly, the cowhide—its name expresses its substance—when wet, it is rolled up tightly and allowed to dry, by which process it becomes as hard as the raw hide commonly seen in this country; its shape is that of a racing-whip, and its length from four to five feet. Thirdly, the strap, i.e., a piece off the end of a stiff heavy horse's trace, and about three or three-and-a-half feet in length. Fourthly, the paddle; i.e., a piece of white oak about an inch thick all through, the handle about two inches broad, and rather more than two feet long, the blade about nine inches long by four and a quarter broad. The two latter implements I found, upon inquiry, were of modern date, and the reason of their introduction was, that the marks of the punishment inflicted thereby became more speedily effaced; and as upon the sale of a slave, if, when examined, marks of punishment are clearly developed, his price suffers from the impression of his being obstreperous, the above-named articles of punishment came into favour.

I’d like to share some thoughts on how slaves are treated. Regarding the nature of that treatment, I’ve already shared my calm and unbiased opinion. My current observations focus on physical punishment and the tools used for it. I've seen four types; there could be many more, but I'm only discussing what I've actually witnessed. The first is the common hunting whip, which is so well-known that it doesn’t need a description. Second, there’s the cowhide—its name speaks for itself—when soaked, it’s tightly rolled up and allowed to dry, making it as hard as the raw hide typically found here; it looks like a racing whip and is about four to five feet long. Third, there’s the strap, which is a piece cut from the end of a stiff, heavy horse's trace, measuring around three to three-and-a-half feet in length. Fourth is the paddle, which is made of white oak and is about an inch thick throughout; the handle is around two inches wide, more than two feet long, and the blade is about nine inches long and four and a quarter inches wide. The last two tools, I found out, are more modern. They were introduced because the marks left by them fade more quickly. When a slave is sold, if there are clear signs of punishment during inspection, it lowers their price because it creates the impression that they’re hard to manage. That’s why these methods of punishment became popular.

The foregoing observations—without entering into the respective merits of the four instruments—are sufficient to prove that no one definite implement for corporal punishment is established by law, and, consequently, that any enactment appointing a limit to the number of stripes which may he given is an absurdity, however well intended. Forty stripes, is, I believe, the authorized number. A certain number of blows, if given with a dog-whip, would inflict no injury beyond the momentary pain, whereas the same number inflicted with a heavy walking-stick might lame a man for life. Again, I know of no law in the States prohibiting the corporal punishment of any slave, of whatever age or sex; at all events, grown-up girls and mothers of families are doomed to have their persons exposed to receive its infliction. Of this latter fact, I am positive, though I cannot say whether the practice is general or of rare occurrence.

The observations mentioned above—without discussing the specific merits of the four methods—are enough to show that there is no single tool for corporal punishment that is mandated by law. Therefore, any law that tries to limit the number of strikes allowed is ridiculous, no matter how well-meaning it may be. I believe the authorized number is forty stripes. A certain number of hits with a dog-whip would only cause temporary pain, while the same number with a heavy walking stick could potentially injure someone for life. Additionally, I’m not aware of any law in the States that prevents the corporal punishment of any slave, regardless of age or gender; in fact, adult women and mothers can be subject to this punishment. I’m certain of this, though I can't say if it happens often or is a rare occurrence.

I have entered rather fully into a description of the implements of punishment, to show the grounds upon which I make the following proposals:—First, that a proper instrument for flogging be authorized by law, and that the employment of any other be severely punished. Secondly, that the number of lashes a master may inflict, or order to be inflicted, be reduced to a minimum, and that while a greater number of lashes are permitted for grave offences, they be only administered on the authority of a jury or a given number of magistrates. Thirdly, that common decency be no longer outraged by any girl above fifteen receiving corporal punishment.[BZ] Fourthly, that by State enactment—as it now sometimes is by municipal regulation—no master in any town be permitted to inflict corporal punishment on a slave above fifteen; those who have passed that age to be sent to the jail, or some authorized place, to receive their punishment, a faithful record whereof, including slave and owner's names, to be kept. My reasons for this proposal are, that a man will frequently punish on the spur of the moment, when a little reflection would subdue his anger, and save the culprit. Also, that it is my firm conviction that a great portion of the cruelty of which slaves are the victims, is caused by half-educated owners of one or two slaves, who are chiefly to be found in towns, and upon whom such a law might operate as a wholesome check. Such a law would doubtless be good in all cases, but the distances of plantations from towns would render it impossible to be carried out; and I am sorry to say, I have no suggestion to make by which the slaves on plantations might be protected, in those cases where the absence of the owners leaves them entirely at the mercy of the driver, which I believe the cause of by far the greatest amount of suffering they endure, though I trust many drivers are just and merciful. Fifthly, that the law by which negroes can hold slaves should immediately be abolished. The white man holding a slave is bad enough, but nothing can justify the toleration of the negro holding his own flesh and blood in fetters, especially when the door of Education is hermetically sealed against him.

I have gone into detail about the methods of punishment to explain the basis for my proposals:—First, that a legal instrument for flogging be established, and that using any other method be strictly punished. Second, that the number of lashes a master can give, or order to be given, be limited to a minimum, and that while a higher number of lashes may be allowed for serious offenses, they should only be applied with the permission of a jury or a certain number of magistrates. Third, that common decency no longer be violated by any girl over fifteen receiving corporal punishment. [BZ] Fourth, that by state law—just as it sometimes is by local regulation—no master in any town be allowed to inflict corporal punishment on a slave over fifteen; those who have reached that age should be sent to jail or another authorized location to receive their punishment, with a faithful record kept of this, including the names of the slave and the owner. My reasons for this proposal are that people often punish in the heat of the moment, when a little reflection could calm their anger and save the person being punished. I also believe that a significant amount of the cruelty that slaves face is caused by poorly educated owners of one or two slaves, who are mainly found in towns, and such a law could serve as a beneficial check on them. While this law would likely be beneficial in all instances, the distance of plantations from towns would make it impractical to enforce. Sadly, I have no suggestions on how to protect slaves on plantations, where the absence of owners leaves them completely at the mercy of the driver, which I believe is the cause of much of the suffering they endure, although I hope many drivers are just and merciful. Fifth, the law allowing Black individuals to own slaves should be abolished immediately. A white person holding a slave is bad enough, but nothing can justify allowing a Black person to hold their own family in bondage, especially when they are completely shut out from education.

In addition to the foregoing suggestions for the regulation of punishment, I would propose that any master proved guilty of inflicting or tolerating gross cruelty upon a slave, should forfeit every slave he may possess to the State, and be rendered incapable of again holding them, and that copies of such decisions be sent to each county in the State. In connexion with this subject, there is another point of considerable importance—viz., the testimony of slaves. As matters now stand, or are likely to stand for some time to come, there appear insuperable objections to the testimony of a slave being received on a par with that of a white man, and this constitutes one of the greatest difficulties in enabling the negro to obtain justice for any injury he may have sustained. It appears to me, however, that a considerable portion of this difficulty might he removed by admitting a certain number of slaves—say three—to constitute one witness. Cross-examination would easily detect either combination or falsehood, and a severe punishment attached to such an offence would act as a powerful antidote to its commission. Until some system is arranged for receiving negro evidence in some shape, he must continue the hopeless victim of frequent injustice.

In addition to the previous suggestions for regulating punishment, I propose that any master found guilty of inflicting or allowing severe cruelty upon a slave should lose every slave they own to the State and be prohibited from owning them again. Copies of such decisions should be sent to every county in the State. Related to this issue is another important point—the testimony of slaves. Currently, or likely for some time to come, there are major objections to accepting a slave's testimony on the same level as that of a white person, which poses one of the biggest challenges in allowing Black individuals to seek justice for any harm they’ve suffered. However, I believe that a significant part of this issue could be resolved by allowing a certain number of slaves—let’s say three—to count as one witness. Cross-examination would easily uncover any collusion or falsehood, and imposing strict penalties for such offenses would serve as a strong deterrent. Until a system is established to accept Black testimony in some form, they will remain the hopeless victims of ongoing injustice.

The next subject I propose to consider is a legalized system, having for its object the freedom of the slave. To accomplish this, I would suggest that the State should fix a fair scale of prices, at which the slave might purchase his freedom, one price for males and another for females under twenty, and a similar arrangement of price between the ages of twenty and fifty, after which age the slave to be free, and receive some fixed assistance, either from the State or the master, as might be thought most just and expedient. To enable the slave to take advantage of the privilege of purchasing his freedom, it would be requisite that the State should have banks appointed in which he might deposit his savings at fair interest; but to enable him to have something to deposit, it is also requisite that some law should be passed compelling owners to allow a slave certain portions of time to work out for himself, or if preferred, to work for the master, receiving the ordinary wages for the time so employed, and this, of course, in addition to the Sunday. As, however, among so many masters, some will be cruel and do their utmost to negative any merciful laws which the State may enact, I would for the protection of the slave propose that, if he feel discontented with the treatment of his master, he be allowed to claim the right of being publicly sold, upon giving a certain number of days' warning of such desire on his part; or if he can find any slave-owner who will give the price fixed by law—as before suggested—and is willing to take him, his master to be bound to deliver him up. With regard to the sale of slaves, I think humanity will justify me in proposing that no slave under fifteen years of ago be sold or transferred to another owner without the parents also; and secondly, that husband and wife be never sold or transferred separately, except it be by their own consent. However rarely such separations may take place at present, there is no law to prevent the cruel act, and I have every reason to believe it takes place much oftener than many of my kind-hearted plantation friends would he ready to admit.

The next topic I want to discuss is a legalized system aimed at granting freedom to slaves. To achieve this, I suggest that the State should establish a fair price scale for slaves to purchase their freedom, with one price for men and another for women under twenty, as well as a similar pricing structure for those aged twenty to fifty. After fifty, the slave should be freed and receive some support, either from the State or the master, as deemed fair and practical. To help slaves take advantage of this opportunity to buy their freedom, it’s necessary for the State to set up banks where they can deposit their savings at reasonable interest rates. However, to have something to save, there should also be laws requiring owners to grant slaves a certain amount of time to work for themselves or, if they prefer, to work for their master and receive regular wages for that time, in addition to Sundays. Given that some masters will be cruel and try to undermine any compassionate laws enacted by the State, I propose that if a slave is unhappy with their master's treatment, they should be allowed to request to be publicly sold, provided they give a certain number of days' notice. Or, if they find another slave owner willing to pay the legally fixed price and take them, their current master should be obligated to release them. Regarding the sale of slaves, I believe humanity supports my proposal that no slave under the age of fifteen should be sold or transferred to another owner without their parents. Additionally, husbands and wives should never be sold or transferred separately unless both consent to it. Although such separations are rare today, there is no law preventing this cruel act, and I have every reason to believe it happens much more often than many of my compassionate plantation friends would be willing to admit.

Looking forward to the gradual, but ultimately total abolition of slavery, I would next suggest that, after a certain date—say ten years—every slave, upon reaching thirty years of age, be apprenticed by his master to some trade or occupation for five years, at the expiration of which time he be free; after another fixed period—say ten years—all slaves above twenty years of age be similarly treated; and after a third period, I would propose that the United States should follow the noble example long since set them by Peru, and make it an integral part of their constitution that "no one is born a slave in the Republic."

Looking forward to the gradual but complete end of slavery, I would suggest that, after a certain date—let's say ten years—every slave, upon turning thirty, should be apprenticed by their master to a trade or occupation for five years, after which they would be free. After another set period—let's say ten years—all slaves over the age of twenty should be treated the same way. Finally, I propose that the United States should follow the commendable example set long ago by Peru and include in their constitution that "no one is born a slave in the Republic."

The next proposal I have to make is one which I cannot but hope that all Americans will fell the propriety of, inasmuch as the present system is, in my estimation, one of the blackest features of the institution we are considering. I allude to the slavery of Americans themselves. In nearly every civilized nation in the world, blood is considered to run in the father's line, and although illegitimacy forfeits inheritance, it never forfeits citizenship. How is it in the United States? There the white man's offspring is to be seen in fetters—the blood of the free in the market of the slave. No one can have travelled in the Southern States without having this sad fact forced upon his observation. Over and over again have I seen features, dark if you will, but which showed unmistakeably the white man's share in their parentage. Nay, more—I have seen slaves that in Europe would pass for German blondes. Can anything be imagined more horrible than a free nation trafficking in the blood of its co-citizens? Is it not a diabolical premium on iniquity, that the fruit of sin can be sold for the benefit of the sinner? Though the bare idea may well nauseate the kind and benevolent among the Southerners, the proof of parentage is stamped by Providence on the features of the victims, and their slavery is incontrovertible evidence that the offspring of Columbia's sons may be sold at human shambles. Even in Mussulman law, the offspring of the slave girl by her master is declared free; and shall it be said that the followers of Christ are, in any point of mercy, behind the followers of the false prophet? My proposition, then, is, that every slave who is not of pure African blood, and who has reached, or shall reach, the age of thirty, be apprenticed to some trade for five years, and then become free; and that all who shall subsequently be so born, be free from their birth, and of course, that the mother who is proved thus to have been the victim of the white man's passion be manumitted as well as her child.

The next proposal I want to present is one that I truly hope all Americans will see as appropriate, since the current system is, in my opinion, one of the darkest aspects of the institution we are discussing. I’m referring to the slavery of Americans themselves. In nearly every civilized country around the world, lineage is traced through the father, and while being born out of wedlock may lead to losing inheritance, it never affects citizenship. How does it work in the United States? There, the children of white men are seen in chains—the blood of the free traded in the slave market. Anyone who has traveled in the Southern States cannot have missed this heartbreaking reality. Time and again, I have observed features that, although darker, clearly indicate a white ancestry. Moreover, I have seen slaves who in Europe would be considered German blondes. Can anything be more horrifying than a free nation profiting from the blood of its fellow citizens? Isn’t it a wicked reward for wrongdoing that the fruits of sin can be sold for the benefit of the sinner? While the thought may disgust kind and caring people in the South, the evidence of parentage is evident in the features of the victims, and their enslavement is undeniable proof that the offspring of Columbia’s sons can be sold like cattle. Even under Islamic law, the child of a slave woman and her master is declared free; should it be said that Christians are, in any way, less merciful than the followers of the false prophet? Therefore, my proposal is that every slave who is not of pure African descent and who has reached or will reach the age of thirty should be apprenticed to a trade for five years and then be granted freedom; and that all who are subsequently born under these circumstances should be free from birth. Additionally, the mother, who has been proven to be a victim of the white man’s desires, should also be freed along with her child.

I make no proposal about the spiritual instruction of the slave, as I believe that as much is given at present as any legislative enactment would be likely to procure; but I have one more suggestion to make, and it is one without which I fear any number of acts which might be passed for the benefit of the slave would lose the greater portion of their value. That suggestion is, the appointment of a sufficient number of officers, selected from persons known to be friendly to the slave, to whom the duty of seeing the enactments strictly carried out should be delegated.

I don’t propose anything about the spiritual education of the slave because I think what is currently given is as much as any law could realistically provide. However, I do have one more suggestion to make, and I worry that without it, any laws passed to benefit the slave would lose much of their value. My suggestion is to appoint enough officers, chosen from people known to be supportive of the slave, to ensure that the laws are enforced properly.

While ruminating on the foregoing pages, a kind of vision passed before my mind. I beheld a deputation of Republicans—among whom was one lady—approaching me. Having stated that they had read my remarks upon Slavery, I immediately became impressed in their favour, and could not refuse the audience they requested. I soon found the deputation consisted of people of totally different views, and consequently each addressed me separately.

While reflecting on the previous pages, a vision unfolded in my mind. I saw a group of Republicans—along with one woman—coming towards me. After they mentioned that they had read my comments on slavery, I felt a positive impression toward them and couldn’t turn down their request for a meeting. I quickly realized that the group was made up of people with completely different opinions, so each one spoke to me individually.

The first was an old gentleman, and a determined advocate of the institution. He said, "Your remarks are all bosh; the African race were born slaves, and have been so for centuries, and are fit for nothing else."—I replied, "I am quite aware of the effect of breeding; we have a race of dog in England which, from their progenitors of many successive generations having had their tails cut off in puppyhood, now breed their species without tails; nay, more—what are all our sporting dogs, but evidence of the same fact? A pointer puppy stands instinctively at game, and a young hound will run a fox; take the trouble, for many generations, to teach the hound to point and the pointer to run, and their two instincts will become entirely changed. The fact, sir, is that the African having been bred a slave for so many generations is one great cause of his lower order of intellect; breed him free and educate him, and you will find the same result in him as in the dog."—He was about to reply when another of the deputation rose and reminded him they had agreed to make but one observation each, and to receive one answer. I rejoiced at this arrangement, as it saved me trouble and gave me the last word.

The first was an older man, a strong supporter of the system. He said, "Your comments are nonsense; the African race was born into slavery and has been for centuries, and is suited for nothing else." I responded, "I understand the impact of breeding; we have a dog breed in England that, due to having their tails cut off for many generations, now produces offspring without tails. Moreover, our sporting dogs are proof of this. A young pointer instinctively points at game, and a young hound will chase a fox. If you spend generations training the hound to point and the pointer to chase, their instincts will completely change. The reality is that the African, having been bred as a slave for many generations, is one significant reason for his lesser intellect. If you breed him to be free and educate him, you'll see the same results as with the dog." He was about to respond when another member of the group stood up and reminded him they had agreed to make only one comment each and receive one answer. I was grateful for this arrangement as it saved me effort and gave me the final word.

A very touchy little slaveholder next addressed me, saying, "Pray, sir, why can't you leave us alone, and mind your own business?"—I replied, "As for leaving you alone, I am quite ready to do so when you have left the negro alone; but as for exclusively attending to my own business, that would be far too dull; besides, it is human nature to interfere with other people's affairs, and I can't go against nature."—He retired, biting his lip, and as the door closed, I thought I heard the words "Meddling ass!"—but I wont be sure.

A very sensitive slaveholder then spoke to me, saying, "Please, sir, why can’t you just leave us alone and focus on your own business?" I responded, "I can leave you alone when you leave the Black people alone; but as for only focusing on my own business, that sounds really boring. Besides, it's human nature to get involved in other people's affairs, and I can't go against that." He walked away, biting his lip, and as the door closed, I thought I heard him mutter, "Meddling idiot!"—but I’m not certain.

Next came a swaggering bully of a slave-driver, evidently bred in the North. He said, "This, sir, is a free country; why mayn't every master wallop his own nigger?"—I thought it best to cut him short; so I said, "Because, if freedom is perfect, such a permission would involve its opposite—viz., that every nigger may wallop his own master; and your antecedents, I guess, might make such a law peculiarly objectionable to you personally."—He retired, eyeing first me and then his cowhide in a very significant manner.

Next came a boastful bully of a slave driver, clearly from the North. He said, "This is a free country; why can't every master beat his own slave?"—I thought it best to interrupt him, so I replied, "Because, if freedom is truly freedom, allowing that would mean every slave could beat their own master; and considering your background, I bet that law would be particularly unappealing to you."—He left, giving me and then his whip a very meaningful look.

The next spokesman was a clerical slaveholder, with a very stiff and very white neckcloth, hair straight and long, and a sanctified, reproof-ful voice. "Sir," said he, "why endeavour to disturb an institution that Scripture sanctions, and which provides so large a field for the ministrations of kindness and sympathy—two of the most tender Christian virtues?" A crocodile tear dropped like a full stop to finish his sentence. Irascibility and astonishment were struggling within me, when I heard his speech; but memory brought St. Paul to my aid, who reminded me he had before written certain words to the Corinthian Church—"Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light; therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed," &e. Thereupon I became calmer, and replied, "Sir, you are perfectly aware that our Saviour's mission was to the heart of man, and not to the institutions of man. Did He not instruct his subjugated countrymen to pay tribute to Caesar? and did He not set the example in his own person? Did He not instruct his disciples in the same breath, 'Fear God! honour the king?'—and is it not elsewhere written, 'But I say unto you, that ye resist not evil?' You are also perfectly aware that the American colonies refused to pay tribute to their Caesar, refused to honour their king, and did resist the evil. Now, sir, these things being so, you are compelled to admit one of two alternatives—either the whole of your countrymen are rebels against the Most High, and therefore aliens from God, or else, as I before said, the mission of the Gospel is to the hearts and not to the institutions of man. I see, sir, by the way you winced under the term 'rebel,' that you accept the latter alternative. If, then, it be addressed to the heart of man, it is through that channel—as it becomes enlarged by those virtues of which you spoke, kindness and sympathy—that human institutions are to become modified to suit the growing intelligence and growing wants of the human race, the golden rule for man's guidance being, Do as you would be done by. Be kind enough, sir, to look at Mr. Sambo Caesar working under the lash in a Carolina rice swamp; behold Mrs. Sambo Caesar torn from his bosom, and working under the same coercive banner in Maryland; and little Master Pompey, the only pledge of their affections, on his way to Texas. Is not this a beautiful comment on the Divine command, 'Love thy neighbour as thyself?' Permit me, sir, with all due respect, to urge you not to rest satisfied with preaching Christian resignation to the slave, and Christian kindness to the owner, but to seize every opportunity of fearlessly asserting that slavery is at variance with the spirit of the Gospel, and therefore that it behoves all Christians so to modify and change the laws respecting it, as gradually to lead to its total extinction. Good morning."—The reverend gentleman, who during the latter part of my observations had buried his hands in the bottom of his tail pockets, no sooner saw that I had finished my remarks, than he hastily withdrew his hands, exhibiting in one a Testament, in the other a Concordance; he evidently was rampant for controversy, but the next deputy, who thought I had already devoted an unfair proportion of time to the minister, reminded him of the regulations, and he was obliged to retire, another deputy opening the door for him, as both his hands were full.

The next speaker was a clerical slaveholder, wearing a very stiff and very white neckcloth, with long, straight hair, and a sanctimonious, reprimanding voice. "Sir," he said, "why try to disrupt an institution that Scripture supports, which allows for so much kindness and sympathy—two of the most compassionate Christian virtues?" A crocodile tear fell like a period at the end of his sentence. I felt a mix of anger and shock as I listened to him, but then I remembered St. Paul, who had previously written to the Corinthian Church, "Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light; so it's not surprising if his ministers also appear as such," and so on. This made me calmer, and I replied, "Sir, you know very well that our Savior’s mission was to the heart of man, not to human institutions. Didn’t He tell His oppressed countrymen to pay taxes to Caesar? Didn’t He set the example by doing it Himself? Didn’t He tell His disciples, 'Fear God! Honor the king?'—and isn't it written elsewhere, 'But I say to you, do not resist evil?' You also know that the American colonies refused to pay taxes to their Caesar, refused to honor their king, and did resist evil. Now, sir, given these facts, you must accept one of two options—either all your countrymen are rebels against the Most High and thus separated from God, or, as I mentioned before, the Gospel’s mission is to the hearts of men, not to human institutions. I see, sir, by the way you flinched at the word 'rebel,' that you accept the latter option. If it is indeed aimed at the heart of man, it is through that channel—as it expands through the virtues of kindness and sympathy—that human institutions will adapt to meet the rising intelligence and needs of humanity, with the guiding principle of treating others as you want to be treated. Please, sir, consider Mr. Sambo Caesar working under the whip in a Carolina rice field; look at Mrs. Sambo Caesar, torn from his embrace and working under the same oppressive system in Maryland; and little Master Pompey, their only hope, on his way to Texas. Is this a beautiful illustration of the Divine command, 'Love your neighbor as yourself?' With all due respect, I urge you not to be satisfied with preaching Christian patience to the slave and Christian compassion to the owner, but to take every opportunity to boldly declare that slavery contradicts the spirit of the Gospel and that all Christians should work to change the laws regarding it to ultimately bring about its total abolition. Good morning."—The reverend gentleman, who had buried his hands deeply in his back pockets during the latter part of my comments, quickly pulled them out to reveal a Testament in one hand and a Concordance in the other; he clearly was eager for a debate. But the next deputy, thinking I had already given too much time to the minister, reminded him of the rules, and he had to leave, another deputy opening the door for him since his hands were full.

The deputy who next rose to address me was accompanied by the lady, whom, of course, I begged to be seated. The husband—for such he proved to be—then spoke as follows:—"Sir, my wife and I have been in possession of a plantation for nearly twenty years. During all that period the rod has scarcely ever been used, except occasionally to some turbulent little boy. We have built cottages for our slaves; we allow them to breed poultry, which we purchase from them; old slaves are carefully nurtured and exempt from labour; the sick have the best of medical attendance, and are in many cases ministered to by my wife and daughter; the practical truths of Christianity are regularly taught to them; and every slave, I am sure, looks upon me and my family as his truest friends. This happy state, this patriarchal relationship, your proposals, if carried out, would completely overthrow." He was then silent, and his wife bowed an assent to the observations he had made. My heart was touched with the picture of the little negro paradise which he had given, and I replied, as mildly as possible, "The sketch you have so admirably drawn, and every word of which I fully believe, is indeed one which might dispose me to abandon my proposals for change, did any one which I had made interfere with the continuance of your benevolent rule, as long as slavery exists; but I must call your attention to an important fact which you, I fear, have quite overlooked during your twenty years of kind rule. To be brief—the cheerful homes of your happy negro families can afford no possible consolation to the less fortunate negroes whose wives and children are torn from their bosoms and sold in separate lots to different parts of the Union; nor will the knowledge that on your plantation the rod only falls occasionally on some turbulent child, be any comfort to grown-up negroes and negresses while writhing under thirty or forty stripes from the cowhide or paddle. Continue, most excellent people, your present merciful rule; strive to secure to every negro the same treatment; and if you find that impossible, join the honourable ranks of the temperate and gradual abolitionist and colonizer." They listened patiently to my observations, smiled quietly at the vanity which they thought the last sentence exhibited, and retired.

The deputy who next spoke to me was with his wife, whom I politely asked to sit down. The husband—who turned out to be her spouse—then said, “Sir, my wife and I have owned a plantation for almost twenty years. During that time, we’ve rarely used the rod, except for a few unruly little boys. We’ve built cottages for our enslaved workers; we let them raise poultry, which we buy from them; we take good care of our elderly slaves and don’t make them work; the sick get the best medical care, often helped by my wife and daughter; we teach them the practical lessons of Christianity regularly; and I believe every slave sees me and my family as their true friends. This nice situation, this familial bond, would be completely disrupted by your proposals if they were implemented.” He stopped speaking, and his wife nodded in agreement with what he had said. My heart was moved by the image of the little paradise he described, and I responded as gently as I could, “The picture you’ve so beautifully painted, which I completely believe, is indeed one that might make me reconsider my proposals for change, if any of them threatened your kind leadership as long as slavery exists; but I must point out an important fact that you, I’m afraid, have overlooked during your twenty years of benevolent rule. In short—the cheerful homes of your happy families of enslaved people offer no comfort to the unfortunate ones whose wives and children are torn away and sold separately across the country; nor will knowing that on your plantation the rod is only occasionally used on a troublesome child provide any solace to adults while they endure thirty or forty lashes from a whip or paddle. Please, by all means, continue your kind leadership; strive to ensure every enslaved person receives the same treatment; and if you find that impossible, join the honorable ranks of those advocating for a gradual end to slavery and colonization.” They listened patiently to what I had to say, smiled quietly at what they perceived as the arrogance of my last sentence, and then left.

Scarce had the last charming couple disappeared, when a deputy arose, the antipodes of the last speaker; his manner was so arrogant, I instantly suspected his ignorance, and his observations showed such painful sensitiveness, that they were evidently the production of an accusing conscience. His parentage I could not ascertain accurately; but, being a slight judge of horseflesh, I should suspect he was by "Slave-bully" out of "Kantankerousina,"—a breed by no means rare in America, but thought very little of by the knowing ones. On referring to the list, I found he was entered as "Recriminator," and that the rest of the deputation had refused to give him a warranty. He sprang up with angry activity; he placed his left hand on his breast, the right hand he extended with cataleptic rigidity, and with an expression of countenance which I can only compare to that of an injured female of spotless virtue, he began, "You, sir—yes, I say, you, sir—you presume to speak of the slave—you, sir, who come from a nation of slaves, whose rampant aristocrats feed on the blood of their serfs, where title is another word for villany, and treads honesty beneath its iron heel! You, sir, you offer suggestions for the benefit of a country whose prosperity excites your jealousy, and whose institutions arouse mingled feelings of hatred and fear! Go home, sir—go home! no more of your canting hypocrisy about the lusty negro! go home, sir, I say! enrich your own poor, clothe your naked, and feed your own starving—the negro here is better off than most of them! Imitate the example of this free and enlightened nation, where every citizen is an independent sovereign; send your royalty and, aristocracy to all mighty smash, raise the cap of Liberty on the lofty pole of Democracy, and let the sinews of men obtain their just triumphs over the flimsy rubbish of intellect and capital! Tyranny alone makes differences. All men are equal!"—He concluded his harangue just in time to save a fit, for it was given with all the fuss and fury of a penny theatre King Richard; in fact, I felt at one time strongly inclined to call for "a horse," but, having accepted the deputation, I was bound to treat its members with courtesy; so I replied, "Sir, your elegantly expressed opinions of royalty, &c., require nothing but ordinary knowledge to show their absurdity, so I will not detain you by dwelling on that subject; but, sir, you studiously avoid alluding to the condition of the slave, and, by seeking for a fault elsewhere, endeavour to throw a cloak over the subject of this meeting. You tell me the poor in England need much clothing and food—that is very true; but, sir, if every pauper had a fur cloak and a round of beef, I cannot see the advantage the negro would derive therefrom. Again, sir, you say the negro is better off than many of our poor; so he is far better off than many of the drunken rowdies of your own large towns; yet I have never heard it suggested that they should be transformed into slaves, by way of bettering their condition. Take my advice, sir; before you throw stones, he sure that there is not a pane of glass in your Cap of Liberty big enough for 3,000,000 of slaves to look through. And pray, sir, do not forget, 'Tyranny alone makes differences. All men are equal!'"

Scarce had the last charming couple disappeared when a deputy stood up, completely opposite to the last speaker; his attitude was so arrogant that I immediately suspected his ignorance, and his comments revealed such painful sensitivity that it was clear they came from a guilty conscience. I couldn't accurately determine his background; but, having a slight sense of horse judging, I'd guess he was sired by "Slave-bully" out of "Kantankerousina,"—a breed that's not rare in America but looked down upon by those in the know. When I checked the list, I found he was listed as "Recriminator," and the rest of the delegation had refused to endorse him. He jumped up with angry energy; he placed his left hand on his chest, his right arm extended rigidly, and with an expression I can only compare to that of a wronged woman of pure virtue, he began, "You, sir—yes, I mean you, sir—you dare to speak of the slave—you, sir, who come from a nation of slaves, whose greedy aristocrats thrive on the suffering of their serfs, where a title is just another word for villainy, and crushes honesty beneath its iron heel! You, sir, suggest changes for a country whose success fuels your envy, and whose institutions stir up mixed feelings of hatred and fear! Go home, sir—go home! No more of your preachy hypocrisy about the strong black man! Go home, I say! Take care of your own poor, clothe your naked, and feed your starving— the black man here is better off than most of them! Follow the example of this free and enlightened nation, where every citizen is an independent sovereign; tear down your monarchy and aristocracy, raise the flag of Liberty on the tall pole of Democracy, and let the strength of the people achieve their rightful victories over the flimsy junk of intellect and wealth! Only tyranny creates differences. All men are equal!"—He finished his speech just in time to avoid a fit, as it was delivered with all the fuss and fury of a cheap theater's King Richard; in fact, I was tempted at one point to call for "a horse," but since I had accepted the delegation, I had to treat its members with respect; so I replied, "Sir, your elegantly expressed opinions about royalty, etc., only require basic knowledge to reveal their absurdity, so I won’t waste your time on that subject; but, sir, you carefully avoid discussing the condition of the slave, and by searching for faults elsewhere, you try to cover up the topic of this meeting. You claim the poor in England need clothing and food—that’s very true; but, sir, if every pauper had a fur coat and a round of beef, I fail to see how that would benefit the black man. Again, sir, you say the black man is better off than many of our poor; so he is indeed better off than many of the drunkards in your own big cities; yet I have never heard anyone suggest that they should be turned into slaves to better their situation. Take my advice, sir; before you throw stones, make sure there isn’t a pane of glass in your Cap of Liberty wide enough for 3,000,000 slaves to look through. And please, sir, don’t forget, 'Only tyranny creates differences. All men are equal!'"

A slam of the door announced the departure and the temper of Recriminator, and it also brought upon his feet another deputy who had kept hitherto quite in the background. He evidently was anxious for a private audience, but that being impossible, he whispered in my ear, "Sir, I am an abolitionist, slick straight off; and all I have got to say is, that you are a soap-suddy, milk-and-water friend to the slave, fix it how you will." Seeing he was impatient to be off, I whispered to him in reply, "Sir, there is an old prayer that has often been uttered with great sincerity, and is probably being so uttered now by more than one intelligent slave: it is this, 'Good Lord, save me from my friends.' The exertions of your party, sir, remind me much of those of a man who went to pull a friend out of the mud, but, by a zeal without discretion, he jumped on his friend's head, and stuck him faster than ever."

A slam of the door signaled the departure and the mood of Recriminator, and it also brought to his feet another deputy who had been lingering in the background. He clearly wanted a private conversation, but since that wasn't possible, he leaned in and whispered in my ear, "Sir, I’m an abolitionist through and through; and all I have to say is that you’re a wishy-washy, half-hearted friend to the slave, however you try to spin it." Noticing he was eager to leave, I responded quietly, "Sir, there’s an old prayer that has often been said with genuine feeling, and it’s probably being said right now by more than one aware slave: ‘Good Lord, save me from my friends.’ The efforts of your group remind me of a guy who tried to pull a friend out of the mud but, in his overzealousness, ended up jumping on his friend’s head and pushing him down even deeper."

When he disappeared, I was in hopes it was all over; but a very mild-tempered looking man, with a broad intelligent forehead, got up, and, approaching me in the most friendly manner, said, "Sir, I both admit and deplore the evil of the institution you have been discussing, but its stupendous difficulties require a much longer residence than yours has been to fathom them; and until they are fully fathomed, the remedies proposed must be in many cases very unsuitable, uncalled for, and insufficient. However, sir, I accept your remarks in the same friendly spirit as, I am sure, you have offered them. Permit me, at the same time, as one many years your senior, to say that, in considering your proposals, I shall separate the chaff—of which there is a good deal—from the wheat—of which there is some little; the latter I shall gather into my mind's garner, and I trust it will fall on good soil." I took the old gentleman's hand and shook it warmly, and, as he retired, I made up my mind he was the sensible slave-owner.

When he vanished, I hoped it was finally over; but a very mild-mannered man, with a broad, intelligent forehead, stood up and approached me in a friendly way. He said, "Sir, I acknowledge and regret the flaws of the institution you've been discussing, but its enormous challenges require much longer experience than what you’ve had to truly understand them. Until we fully grasp those challenges, the proposed solutions will often be unsuitable, unnecessary, and insufficient. However, I appreciate your comments in the same friendly spirit in which I’m sure you intended them. Allow me, as someone who is many years your senior, to say that when I consider your proposals, I will distinguish the chaff—of which there is plenty—from the wheat—of which there is some little; the latter I will keep in mind, and I hope it will yield good results." I took the old gentleman's hand and shook it warmly, and as he stepped away, I concluded he was the sensible slave owner.

I was about to leave the scene, quite delighted that the ordeal was over, when, to my horror, I heard a strong Northern voice calling out lustily, "Stranger, I guess I have a word for you." On turning round I beheld a man with a keen Hebrew eye, an Alleghany ridge nose, and a chin like the rounded half of a French roll. I was evidently alone with a 'cute man of dollars and cents. On my fronting him, he said, with Spartan brevity, "Who's to pay?" Conceive, O reader! my consternation at being called upon to explain who was to make compensation for the sweeping away—to a considerable extent, at all events—of what represented, in human flesh, 250,000,000l., and in the produce of its labour 80,000,000l. annually!

I was about to leave the scene, quite pleased that the ordeal was over, when, to my horror, I heard a strong Northern voice calling out enthusiastically, "Stranger, I think I have a word for you." Turning around, I saw a man with a sharp Hebrew eye, a nose like those from the Alleghany ridges, and a chin shaped like the rounded half of a French roll. I was clearly alone with a smart guy focused on money. Facing him, he asked, bluntly, "Who's going to pay?" Imagine, dear reader, my shock at being asked to explain who would compensate for the loss—at least to some extent—of what represented, in human terms, £250,000,000, and from the labor it generated, £80,000,000 annually!

Answer I must; so, putting on an Exchequery expression, I said, "Sir, if a national stain is to be washed out, the nation are in honour bound to pay for the soap. England has set you a noble example under similar circumstances, and the zeal of the abolitionists will, no doubt, make them tax themselves double; but as for suggesting to you by what tax the money is to be raised, you must excuse me, sir. I am a Britisher, and remembering how skittish you were some years ago about a little stamp and tea affair, I think I may fairly decline answering your question more in detail; a burnt child dreads the fire."—The 'cute man disappeared and took the vision with him; in its place came the reality of 2 A.M. and the candles flickering in their sockets.

I have to respond; so, putting on a serious expression, I said, "Sir, if a national issue needs to be resolved, the nation has an obligation to pay for the solution. England has set a great example in similar situations, and the dedication of the abolitionists will likely lead them to tax themselves even more; however, as for suggesting how the money should be raised, I have to decline, sir. I'm British, and remembering how sensitive you were a few years ago about a small stamp and tea situation, I think it's fair for me to avoid answering your question in detail; a burnt child fears the fire."—The clever man left and took the vision with him; in its place came the reality of 2 A.M. and the candles flickering in their holders.

Reader, I have now done with the question of the gradual improvement and ultimate emancipation of the slave. The public institutions of any country are legitimate subjects of comment for the traveller, and in proportion as his own countrymen feel an interest in them, so is it natural he should comment on them at greater or less length. I have, therefore, dwelt at large upon this subject, from the conviction that it is one in which the deepest interest is felt at home; and I trust that I have so treated it as to give no just cause of offence to any one, whether English or American.

Reader, I've now finished discussing the gradual improvement and eventual freedom of the slave. The public institutions of any country are valid topics for travelers to comment on, and the more interest his fellow countrymen have in them, the more natural it is for him to write about them in detail. I've therefore spent a considerable amount of time on this topic, believing it’s one that matters deeply to people at home; and I hope I've addressed it in a way that doesn’t give anyone, whether English or American, any reason to be upset.

I hope I have impressed my own countrymen with some idea of the gigantic obstacles that present themselves, of which I will but recapitulate three;—the enormous pecuniary interests involved; the social difficulty arising from the amount of negro population; and, though last not least, the perplexing problem—if Washington's opinion, that "Slavery can only cease by legislative authority," is received—how Congress can legislate for independent and sovereign States beyond the limits of the Constitution by which they are mutually bound to each other. I feel sure that much of the rabid outcry, the ovation of Mrs. B. Stowe, and other similar exhibitions, have arisen from an all but total ignorance of the true facts of the case. This ignorance it has been my object to dispel; and I unhesitatingly declare that the emancipation of the negroes throughout the Southern States, if it took place to-morrow, would be the greatest curse the white man could inflict upon them. I also trust that I may have shadowed forth some useful idea, to assist my Southern friends in overtaking a gangrene which lies at their heart's core, and which every reflecting mind must see is eating into their vitals with fearful rapidity. My last and not my least sincere hope is, that some one among the many suggestions I have offered for the negro's present benefit, may be found available to mitigate the undoubted sufferings and cruel injustice of which those with bad masters must frequently be the victims. Should I succeed in even one solitary instance, I shall feel more than repaid for the many hours of thought and trouble I have spent over the intricate problem—the best road from Slavery to Emancipation.

I hope I have shown my fellow countrymen some sense of the huge obstacles we face, which I’ll summarize in three points: the massive financial interests at stake; the social challenges stemming from the large population of Black individuals; and, importantly, the complicated question—if we accept Washington's view that "Slavery can only end through legislative authority"—of how Congress can legislate for independent and sovereign states that are bound to each other by a Constitution. I'm convinced that much of the heated debate, the fanfare around Mrs. B. Stowe, and similar reactions come from a nearly complete misunderstanding of the true situation. It has been my goal to clear up this ignorance; and I firmly state that the emancipation of Black people in the Southern States, if it were to happen tomorrow, would be the greatest misfortune the white man could impose on them. I also hope that I have suggested some useful ideas to help my Southern friends tackle a deep-seated issue that is rapidly damaging them. My final and sincere hope is that one of the many suggestions I’ve shared for the current benefit of Black individuals may help reduce the undeniable suffering and harsh injustice that those unfortunate enough to have bad masters often experience. If I can succeed in even one small case, I will feel more than compensated for the hours of thought and effort I have devoted to the complex issue of finding the best path from Slavery to Emancipation.

Since writing the foregoing, 20,000,000 freemen, by the decision of their representatives at Washington, have hung another negro's shackle on their pole of Liberty (?). Kansas is enslaved—freedom is dishonoured. As a proof how easily those who are brought up under the institution of Slavery blind themselves to the most simple facts, Mr. Badger, the senator for North Carolina, after eulogizing the treatment of slaves, and enlarging upon the affection between them and their masters, stated that, if Nebraska was not declared a Slave State[CA] it would preclude him, should he wish to settle there, from taking with him his "old mammy,"—the negro woman who had nursed him in infancy. Mr. Wade, from Ohio, replied, "that the senator was labouring under a mistake; there was nothing to prevent his taking his beloved mammy with him, though Nebraska remained free, except it were that he could not sell her when he got there."

Since writing the above, 20 million free people, by the decision of their representatives in Washington, have added another shackle to their Liberty pole (?). Kansas is enslaved—freedom is mocked. To demonstrate how easily those raised in the system of Slavery can ignore the most obvious truths, Mr. Badger, the senator from North Carolina, after praising the treatment of slaves and discussing the affection between them and their masters, claimed that if Nebraska weren't declared a Slave State[CA] it would stop him, if he wanted to settle there, from bringing his "old mammy,"—the Black woman who nursed him when he was a baby. Mr. Wade, from Ohio, responded, "that the senator was mistaken; nothing would prevent him from bringing his beloved mammy with him, even if Nebraska stayed free, except that he couldn't sell her when he got there."

Let the Christian learn charity from the despised Mussulman. Read the following proclamation:—

Let the Christian learn kindness from the disliked Muslim. Read the following announcement:—

"From the Servant of God, the Mushir Ahmed Basha Bey, Prince of the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__"
Tunisian territories.
"To our ally, Sir Thomas Reade, Consul-General of the British"
Tunis Government.
"The servitude imposed on a portion of humanity whom God has"
Creation can be really harsh, and our hearts shrink away from it.
"It has always been the focus of our attention for many years,"
which we used to take the right steps that could lead us to
its removal, as you are well aware. Now, we have
We deemed it necessary to announce that we have ended slavery for all men in every aspect.
Our territories, since we consider all slaves who are in our
consider the territory as free and do not acknowledge the legality of their existence
kept as an asset. We've sent the required orders to all the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
governors of our Tunisian kingdom, and let you know about it accordingly
that you may understand that all slaves who enter our territory, by
By sea or by land, they shall become free.
"May you be under God's protection!"
"Written in Moharrem, 1262." (January 23, 1846.)

What a bitter satire upon the vaunted "Land of Liberty" have her sons enacted since the Mahometan Prince penned the above! Not only has the slave territory been nearly doubled in the present century; but by a recent decision of the Supreme Court, every law which has been passed by Congress restricting slavery, is pronounced contrary to the constitution, and therefore invalid. Congress is declared powerless to prohibit slavery from any portion of the Federal Territory, or to authorize the inhabitants to do so; the African race, whether slave or free, are declared not to be citizens, and consequently to be incompetent to sue in the United States' Courts, and the slave-owner is pronounced authorized to carry his rights into every corner of the Union, despite the decrees of Congress or the will of the inhabitants.

What a harsh critique of the so-called "Land of Liberty" have its people created since the Muslim Prince wrote the above! Not only has the area for slavery nearly doubled in this century, but a recent Supreme Court decision has declared that any law passed by Congress to restrict slavery is unconstitutional and, therefore, invalid. Congress has been declared incapable of prohibiting slavery in any part of federal territory or allowing the residents to do so; the African race, whether enslaved or free, is deemed not to be citizens, and therefore cannot file lawsuits in U.S. Courts. Furthermore, slave owners are deemed entitled to assert their rights in every part of the Union, regardless of Congress's decisions or the will of the people.

In short, in the year 1857, upwards of eighty years after Washington and his noble band declared—and at the point of the sword won—their independence, and after so many States have purified their shields from the negro's blood, the highest tribunal in the Republic has decreed that the rights of the slave-owner extend to every inch of the Federal soil, and that by their Constitution the United States is a Slave Republic.

In short, in 1857, more than eighty years after Washington and his courageous group declared—and fought for—their independence, and after so many states have cleansed their shields of the blood of the enslaved, the highest court in the republic has ruled that the rights of slave owners extend to every inch of federal land, and that under their Constitution the United States is a Slave Republic.

What will the end be? A few short years have rolled past since the foregoing remarks were penned, and in that interval the question of Slavery has again made the Union tremble to its uttermost borders. The cloud, not bigger than a man's hand, was sped by President Pierce's administration to the new State of Kansas, and ere long it burst in a deluge of ruffianism and blood; the halls of Congress were dishonoured by the violent assault which Mr. Brookes (a Southern senator) made upon Mr. Sumner of Massachusetts; the Press spread far and wide the ignominious fact, that the ladies of his State presented the assailant with a cane, inscribed "Hit him again!" the State itself endorsed his act by re-electing him unanimously; North and South are ranged in bitter hostility; in each large meetings have advocated a separation, in terms of rancour and enmity; and it is to be feared the Union does not possess a man of sufficient weight and character to spread oil over the troubled waters.

What will the end be? A few short years have passed since these remarks were written, and during that time, the issue of slavery has once again made the Union tremble at its edges. The storm, which started as a small issue, was fueled by President Pierce's administration in the new State of Kansas, and soon it erupted into chaos and violence. Congress was embarrassed by the brutal attack that Mr. Brookes (a Southern senator) launched on Mr. Sumner from Massachusetts. The press widely covered the shameful fact that the women of his state gave the attacker a cane with the inscription "Hit him again!" The state itself supported him by re-electing him unanimously. North and South are now in bitter opposition; large meetings in each have called for separation with hostility and resentment; and it seems that the Union lacks a person with enough influence and integrity to calm the turbulent situation.

How will "Manifest Destiny" unfold itself, and what will the end be?—The cup must fill first.

How will "Manifest Destiny" play out, and what will the outcome be?—The cup must fill first.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Many of my suggestions, the reader will observe, are drawn from the Cuba code.


In Peru, the maximum of stripes the law permits to be inflicted is twelve; and girls above fourteen, married women, fathers of children, and old men, are exempt from the lash.


At the time of the discussion, the Nebraska territory included Nebraska and Kansas



CHAPTER XXVII.

Constitution of United States.




The most important subject that claims the attention of the traveller in any country that pretends to education or civilization, is undoubtedly its Constitution. The reader cannot expect—and most probably would not wish—to find, in a work like this, any elaborate account of the government of so vast and varied a republic as that of the United States. Those who wish thoroughly to grasp so very extensive a topic must study the history of each individual State from its foundation; must watch the changes each has undergone, noting the effect produced; and must carefully pore over the writings of the great men who originally planned—if I may so express myself—the Republic, and must dive deep into the learned and valuable tomes of Story, Kent, &c. Those who are content with more moderate information, will find a great deal, very ably condensed, in a volume by Mr. Tremenheere. To the reader, I pretend to offer nothing but a glance at such elements as appear to me most useful and interesting; and in so doing, I shall freely borrow such quotations from Mr. Tremenheere's references to Story and Kent as I conceive may help to elucidate my subject, not having those authors at hand to refer to.

The most important topic that grabs the attention of travelers in any country that claims to be educated or civilized is undoubtedly its Constitution. The reader shouldn't expect—and probably wouldn't want to—find a detailed account of the government of such a vast and diverse republic as the United States in a work like this. Those who want to fully understand such a broad subject need to study the history of each state from its beginnings; observe the changes each has gone through and their impacts; and carefully read the writings of the great men who originally designed—if I may put it this way—the Republic, along with delving into the learned and valuable works of Story, Kent, etc. For those who are okay with more moderate information, there's a lot of well-condensed material in a book by Mr. Tremenheere. To the reader, I offer only a brief look at the elements that seem most useful and interesting to me; and in doing so, I will freely use quotes from Mr. Tremenheere's references to Story and Kent that I believe can help clarify my topic, as I don't have those authors available to reference.

The Government of the United States consists of three departments,—the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial; or the President, the House of Representatives and Senate, and the Judicial Courts. The President and Vice-President are chosen by an elective body from all the States, the said body being selected by popular vote in each State. The Vice-President is ex officio Speaker or President of the Senate, and in case of the chief dying, he becomes for the remainder of the term the President of the United States. They are elected for 4 years, but may be re-elected indefinitely. Should the votes be equal, the House of Representatives selects the President from the three on the list who have most votes, and the Senate selects the Vice in the same way. The qualifications for President and Vice are—native born, 35 years of age, and 14 years' residence in the States. The salary of the President is about 5100l. a year, and a residence at Washington, called "The White House." The salary of the Vice-President is 1680l. a year. There are five Secretaries,—State, Interior, Treasury, War, Navy, and a Postmaster-General; the Attorney-General also forms part of the Cabinet. These officials also receive the same salary. The Senate is composed of two members from each State, irrespective of population, so as not to swamp the small States. The election is by the Legislature of each State, and for 6 years; one-third of their number go out every 2 years. The qualification for a senator is that he should be 30 years of age, have been 9 years a citizen, and living in the State for which he is elected. The House of Representatives originally consisted of one member for a certain amount of population, and as the increase in population was very rapid, the number of Representatives increased as a matter of course. In 1843, it was one member for every 70,000 of population, but, to prevent the body from becoming unmanageable owing to numbers, in 1853 the House was limited to 234 Representatives, elected pro ratâ to the several States. Slaves are reckoned in the proportion of three-fifths of their number. The preliminary steps are, that every 10 years a census is taken, after which a bill is passed by Congress, apportioning number of representatives to each State, according to its population. This done, each State passes a law, districting the State according to the number of members assigned it, and each district elects its own representative for Congress. The election is for 2 years, and the qualification is 7 years a citizen, 25 years of age, and living in the State. The salary is the same as that of a senator. The names of members composing a division on any question in either house, are not printed unless they are demanded by one-fifth of the members present. One of the clauses of their Constitution is very original, and runs thus:—"Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behaviour, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member."

The Government of the United States consists of three branches: the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial; or the President, the House of Representatives and Senate, and the Judicial Courts. The President and Vice-President are elected by a body chosen from all the States, and this body is selected through popular vote in each State. The Vice-President is the ex officio Speaker or President of the Senate, and if the President dies, he becomes the President of the United States for the remainder of the term. They serve for 4 years but can be re-elected indefinitely. If there's a tie in votes, the House of Representatives picks the President from the top three candidates who received the most votes, and the Senate selects the Vice-President in the same way. The qualifications for both President and Vice-President are: native born, at least 35 years old, and having lived in the States for 14 years. The President earns about $100,000 a year and has a residence in Washington known as "The White House." The Vice-President earns $16,800 a year. There are five Secretaries—State, Interior, Treasury, War, Navy, and a Postmaster-General; the Attorney-General is also part of the Cabinet. These officials receive the same salary. The Senate has two members from each State, regardless of population, to ensure smaller States are not overrepresented. They are elected by each State's Legislature for 6 years, with one-third of them rotating out every 2 years. A senator must be at least 30 years old, have been a citizen for 9 years, and reside in the State they represent. The House of Representatives started with one member per a specific population size, and as the population grew quickly, the number of Representatives increased accordingly. In 1843, there was one member for every 70,000 people, but to keep the House manageable, it was capped at 234 Representatives in 1853, distributed pro ratâ among the States. Slaves are counted as three-fifths of a person. Every 10 years, a census is conducted, after which Congress passes a bill to allocate the number of Representatives based on population. Once that’s done, each State creates a law to district itself according to its allotted number of members, and each district elects its own representative for Congress. Elections are held every 2 years, and the requirements are 7 years as a citizen, at least 25 years old, and living in the State. The salary is the same as that of a senator. The names of members voting on any issue in either house are only published if one-fifth of the members present request it. One unique clause in their Constitution states: "Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the agreement of two-thirds, expel a member."

All impeachments are tried in the Senate, and a majority of two-thirds is requisite for a conviction. If the President be on trial, the Chief Justice, or head of the Supreme Court, presides. While power of trial rests with the Senate, the power of impeachment rests solely with the House of Representatives. In addition to the ordinary functions of an Upper House, the Senate has also what is called "an Executive Session," which is held with closed doors; at this Session all treaties and high appointments are discussed, and the appointments are not held to be valid till ratified by them. Whenever fresh land becomes sufficiently populous, the general Government admit it as territory, and appoint an administration. This was the case with Nebraska and Kansas in 1853; and the "Missouri Compromise" (which confined slavery south of the 36º 3' parallel of latitude) having been repealed, it became optional with them to adopt slavery or not. Kansas fought barbarously for the dishonourable privilege, and with temporary success: Nebraska has declined the honour as yet. The interests of territories are watched over at Washington by delegates in the House of Representatives, who have a seat, but no vote. This sensible arrangement might, in my humble opinion, be adopted in this country with reference to our colonies, whose wants at present have no interpreter intimately acquainted with colonial affairs in either branch of the Legislature.

All impeachments are tried in the Senate, and a two-thirds majority is required for a conviction. If the President is on trial, the Chief Justice, or head of the Supreme Court, presides. While the Senate holds the power to conduct trials, the House of Representatives has the sole authority to impeach. Along with its usual responsibilities as an Upper House, the Senate also holds what is known as "an Executive Session," which is conducted behind closed doors; during this session, all treaties and high-level appointments are discussed, and the appointments are not considered valid until ratified by the Senate. When new territories become populous enough, the federal government admits them as territories and appoints an administration. This happened with Nebraska and Kansas in 1853 after the "Missouri Compromise" (which restricted slavery to areas south of the 36º 3' parallel of latitude) was repealed, making it up to them to decide whether to adopt slavery. Kansas fought fiercely for the shameful right to it, achieving temporary success, while Nebraska has yet to accept that distinction. The interests of territories are represented in Washington by delegates in the House of Representatives, who have a seat but no vote. In my opinion, this practical arrangement could be applied in this country regarding our colonies, whose needs currently lack representation from someone well-versed in colonial matters in either part of the Legislature.

Each State in the Union has its own Governor, House of Representatives, Senate, and Judiciary, and is in every respect a sovereign State—they like the word as much as they pretend to dislike the reality—acting perfectly independently within its limits, except in such cases as were mutually agreed upon by the terms of the Union, and to some of which we shall refer by and by. This sovereignty of individual States renders the elective franchise different in different States.

Each state in the Union has its own governor, House of Representatives, Senate, and judiciary, and is fully a sovereign state—they enjoy the term even if they pretend to dislike the reality—acting completely independently within its own boundaries, except in cases that were mutually agreed upon by the terms of the Union, and to some of which we will refer later. This sovereignty of individual states makes the right to vote varied across different states.

At the date of the first elections after the Declaration of Independence, no State admitted mere citizenship as a qualification for the elective franchise. The great men who appeared upon the stage at that period, profiting by the experience of past ages, threw certain guards around the franchise in every State in the Union, varying in different States, but all bearing unmistakeable testimony to the fact, that a perfect democracy was not the basis on which they ever contemplated building up the Republic. A few short years have rolled by; the 13 States are increased to 33, and according to Mr. Tremenheere, "a grave departure from the theory of the Constitution, as it existed in the eyes and expectations of its careful and prudent founders, has taken place, in the gradual lowering throughout nearly all the States of the Union, and the entire abandonment in two-thirds of them, of those qualifications for the exercise of the franchise which existed when the Constitution was adopted." In one State—Illinois—aliens being residents are entitled to vote. Now, if the great men of 1776 thought safeguards around the franchise wise and prudent in their day, before the great tide of emigration had set in to the westward, and when the population was only 4,000,000, what would they say, could they but rise from their graves and see how their successors have thrown down the prudent barriers they had raised, and laid the franchise bare to citizenship, now that the Union numbers 23,000,000 souls, and that the tide of emigration is daily flooding them with hordes of the discontented and turbulent from every country in the Old World?

At the time of the first elections after the Declaration of Independence, no state allowed just citizenship as a qualification for voting. The prominent figures of that era, learning from the experiences of history, established certain safeguards around voting in every state in the Union. These safeguards varied from state to state but all clearly indicated that they never envisioned a perfect democracy as the foundation for building the Republic. A few years have passed; the 13 states have grown to 33, and according to Mr. Tremenheere, "there has been a significant shift from the original theory of the Constitution, as understood and anticipated by its careful and prudent founders, with a steady decline in eligibility requirements across nearly all states in the Union, and a total abandonment in two-thirds of them, of the qualifications for voting that existed when the Constitution was adopted." In one state—Illinois—resident aliens are allowed to vote. Now, if the great leaders of 1776 believed it was wise and prudent to have safeguards around voting in their time, before the massive wave of migration headed west and when the population was only 4 million, what would they think if they could rise from their graves and see how their successors have removed the sensible barriers they established and exposed the voting franchise to citizenship, now that the Union has 23 million people and is being inundated with waves of disgruntled and restless immigrants from every country in the Old World?

But perhaps it may be said that I, as an Englishman, am prejudiced against republican institutions in any shape; let me, then, quote you an authority which every educated American will respect. Mr. Justice Kent says, "The progress and impulse of popular opinion, is rapidly destroying every constitutional check, every conservative element, intended by the sages who framed the earliest American Constitutions as safeguards against the abuses of popular suffrage." Let us turn to another equally eminent American authority, Mr. Justice Story. "It might be urged, that it is far from being clear, upon reasoning or experience, that uniformity in the composition of a representative body is either desirable or expedient, founded in sounder policy, or more promotive of the general good, than a mixed system, embracing, representing, and combining distinct interests, classes, and opinions. In England, the House of Commons, as a representative body, is founded upon no uniform principle, either of numbers, or classes, or places; ... and in every system of reform which has found public favour in that country, many of these diversities have been embodied from choice, as important checks upon undue legislation, as facilitating the representation of different interests and different opinions, and as thus securing, by a well-balanced and intelligent representation of all the various classes of society, a permanent protection of the public liberties of the people, and a firm security of the private rights of persons and property."

But maybe it's fair to say that I, as an Englishman, have a bias against republican systems in any form; let me, then, quote an authority that every educated American will respect. Mr. Justice Kent says, "The progress and influence of public opinion is quickly erasing every constitutional check, every conservative element designed by the founders of the earliest American Constitutions to protect against the abuse of popular voting." Now, let’s look at another respected American authority, Mr. Justice Story. "One could argue that it’s not at all clear, based on reasoning or experience, that having uniformity in the makeup of a representative body is either desirable or practical, nor is it rooted in better policy, or better for the common good, than a mixed system that includes, represents, and combines different interests, classes, and opinions. In England, the House of Commons, as a representative body, is based on no uniform principle, either of numbers, or classes, or locations; ... and in every reform effort that has been well-received in that country, many of these differences have been intentionally included as important checks against rash legislation, as a way to facilitate the representation of various interests and opinions, and thereby ensure, through a well-balanced and thoughtful representation of all the different classes of society, a lasting protection of the public liberties of the people, as well as a strong protection of individual rights and property."

Thus far I have quoted the opinions of the highest American authorities upon the franchise. And, as far as the lowering it in England affords us any light, I would wish some unbiased and competent person to inform the public, whether—whatever other benefit it may have procured to the community—it has increased or decreased bribery and corruption; and how the balance between advantage and disadvantage will stand, in reference to the community at large, by a further lowering of the franchise in this country; and also to what extent—if any—it can be lowered, without throwing all but unlimited power into the hands of the masses, and thus destroying that balance of the different interests of the community which are—thank God—still represented, and which, if once lost, would reduce our beloved Sovereign to the position of a gaudy puppet, and the House of Lords to a mere cypher, and be as certainly followed by all the horrors of a revolution, and all the evils of a corrupt democracy. How easy is it to find politicians ever ready to sniff the incense of popularity at the plausible shrine of a descending franchise!--how difficult to find those who, while granting what is just and prudent, have the wisdom to plan, and the courage to dare, measures to arrest a mobular avalanche!

So far, I've quoted the views of top American experts on voting rights. And, as far as lowering it in England gives us any insight, I would like an unbiased and knowledgeable person to tell the public whether—regardless of any other benefits it may have brought to the community—it has led to an increase or decrease in bribery and corruption; and how the balance of pros and cons would look for the community as a whole with a further reduction of voting rights in this country; and also how much it can be lowered—if at all—without giving almost unlimited power to the masses, thus disrupting the balance among the various interests in the community that are—thankfully—still represented, and which, if lost, would reduce our beloved Sovereign to a flashy puppet, and the House of Lords to a mere formality, certainly leading to all the nightmares of a revolution and the problems of a corrupt democracy. How easy it is to find politicians eager to bask in the glow of popularity at the appealing idea of lowering voting rights!—how hard to find those who, while recognizing what is fair and wise, have the insight to plan and the guts to take action to prevent a mob-like runaway situation!

With regard to the frequency of elections, I will only insert the following sentence from Mr. Justice Story, as, I believe, public opinion in this country is all but universal in its condemnation: "Men, to act with vigour and effect, ... must not be hurried on to their conclusions by the passions of elections has a tendency to create agitation and dissensions in the public mind, to nourish factions and encourage restlessness, to favour rash innovations in domestic legislation and public policy, and to produce violent and sudden changes in the administration of public affairs, founded upon temporary excitements and prejudices: ... it operates also as a great discouragement upon suitable candidates offering themselves for the public service ... the period of service ought, therefore, to bear some proportion to the variety of knowledge and practical skill which the duties of the station demand."—If any annual-parliament maniac still exist, let him profit by these words of wisdom from the pen of a republican, dipped in the ink of Prudence and Patriotism; and in the marked difference between the House of Representatives and the Senate Chamber—the former of whom are elected for two, the latter for six years—let him behold the most incontrovertible living proof's of their truth. John Jay, one of the most able men of America, writing to Washington, expresses his wish that the Upper House, or Senate, should be elected for life.

Regarding how often elections happen, I’ll just include this sentence from Mr. Justice Story, since I believe public opinion in this country nearly universally condemns the opposite: “People, to act with energy and effectiveness, … should not be rushed into conclusions by the emotions of elections, which tends to create agitation and conflict in the public mind, to fuel factions and promote restlessness, to support hasty changes in domestic legislation and public policy, and to lead to abrupt and extreme shifts in the management of public affairs, based on temporary excitement and biases: … it also greatly discourages suitable candidates from coming forward for public service … the length of service should therefore relate to the variety of knowledge and practical skills that the duties of the position require.” If any annual-parliament enthusiast still exists, they should take these words of wisdom from a republican, steeped in the wisdom of Prudence and Patriotism; and in the clear difference between the House of Representatives and the Senate—where the former are elected for two years and the latter for six—let them see the most undeniable proof of their truth. John Jay, one of America’s most capable individuals, wrote to Washington, expressing his desire for the Upper House, or Senate, to be elected for life.

I will now turn to a topic which probably interests the British public more than any other—except the franchise—I mean the Ballot. So much has been said about the coercion of voters by those on whom they are dependent, and so much disgraceful jobbery at elections in this country has been laid bare, that if the Ballot were really a panacea for the evil, every patriot should exert his utmost energies to forward the introduction of so essential a measure. In reading any American document where the word "ballot" is used, it must be remembered that, unless the word "secret" precede it, the meaning is merely voting by an open piece of paper on which the name of the candidate is printed, and which he may enclose in an envelope or not, as he chooses. It is, therefore, only with the secret ballot we have to deal at present; for although the power to vote secretly exists, it is obvious, that unless secret voting is made compulsory, it affords no protection to those who are in a position to be bribed or coerced, inasmuch as those who did bribe or coerce would insist upon the vote so obtained being given openly.

I will now discuss a topic that probably interests the British public more than any other—except for the right to vote—I mean the Ballot. There has been a lot of talk about how voters are pressured by those they rely on, and so much disgraceful manipulation at elections in this country has come to light, that if the Ballot were truly a cure-all for this problem, every patriotic citizen should put in maximal effort to push for the introduction of such an essential measure. When reading any American document where the term "ballot" is mentioned, it should be noted that unless the word "secret" comes before it, it simply refers to voting with an open piece of paper that has the candidate's name printed on it, which the voter may or may not place in an envelope as they wish. Therefore, we are only dealing with the secret ballot at this point; because even though the option for secret voting exists, it is clear that unless secret voting is made mandatory, it offers no protection to those who might be bribed or coerced, as those who bribe or coerce would insist that the vote be cast openly.

It will perhaps astonish an Englishman to be told that "secret" ballot is all but unknown in the United States. Nevertheless, such is the case. An act was passed some four years ago in Massachusetts requiring secrecy; and what was the effect of this act? A large body of the electors met together to denounce with indignation any attempt at enforcing that which they repudiated as unworthy of freemen. So strong was this feeling that in 1853, the act which enforced it was repealed, and in the convention called to discuss the revision of their Constitution—according to Mr. Tremenheere—although the democratic party were in a great majority, the effort to impose secrecy was thrown out by a majority of 5000[CB].

It might surprise an Englishman to learn that the "secret" ballot is nearly nonexistent in the United States. However, that's the reality. About four years ago, Massachusetts passed a law requiring secrecy in voting; what was the outcome of this law? A large group of voters gathered to express their outrage at any attempt to enforce something they deemed unworthy of free citizens. The sentiment was so strong that in 1853, the law was repealed, and during the convention called to discuss the revision of their Constitution—according to Mr. Tremenheere—even though the Democratic Party held a significant majority, the push to implement secrecy was rejected by a majority of 5,000[CB].

A friend of mine, who took considerable interest in this question, was present at the elections for the State of Massachusetts, and when, at the same time, a popular vote was to be taken on the proposed revision of the Constitution; this latter was by special enactment made compulsorily secret. How far this object was attained, the following statement will show. As the voters came up to the polling-place, tickets were offered them by the agents of the opposite parties, in a large room full of people. The voters selected whichever ticket they preferred, in the presence of the whole room, and then, in compliance with the terms of the enactment, they sealed it up in an envelope before depositing it in the voting-box. So much for compulsory secrecy. Of course on this occasion, as on all electioneering occasions, the voters might have concealed their votes, had they chosen so to do.

A friend of mine, who was really interested in this issue, was at the elections for the State of Massachusetts. At the same time, there was a public vote on the proposed revision of the Constitution; this vote was made compulsory secret by special enactment. How well this goal was achieved can be seen in the following statement. As voters arrived at the polling place, representatives from the opposing parties offered them tickets in a large room filled with people. The voters picked whichever ticket they wanted, in front of everyone in the room, and then, following the terms of the law, they sealed it in an envelope before dropping it into the voting box. So much for compulsory secrecy. Naturally, as is common during elections, the voters could have kept their votes hidden if they had chosen to do so.

The only States, that I am aware of, where secrecy is enjoined by law are New York and Indiana; and in the former of these I can most certainly testify, from personal observation, that in many instances, if not in most, it is a dead letter. I never met a soul who, in talking about politics, ever thought of concealing his sentiments. I am therefore forced to the conclusion that secrecy only exists among the very lowest; and here it may be as well to introduce the opinions of the Governor of this important State. Mr. Washington Hunt, in his Message of January 7, 1851, says, "The alarming increase of bribery in our popular elections demands your serious attention. The preservation of our liberties depends on the purity of the elective franchise, and its independent exercise by the citizen, and I trust you will adopt such measures as shall effectually protect the ballot-box from all corrupting influences."

The only states I know of where secrecy is required by law are New York and Indiana. In New York, I can definitely say from personal experience that in many cases, if not most, it doesn't really apply. I've never met anyone who, when discussing politics, considered hiding their true feelings. So, I have to conclude that secrecy only exists among the very lowest levels of society. It’s also worth bringing in the views of the Governor of this important state. Mr. Washington Hunt, in his message from January 7, 1851, states, "The alarming rise in bribery during our elections deserves your serious attention. The preservation of our freedoms relies on the integrity of the voting process and its independent exercise by the citizen, and I hope you will implement measures that effectively protect the ballot box from all corrupting influences."


If any efforts were made to stay the tide of corruption, the message of the same Governor the following year will enable you to judge of their success. In his address on the 6th of January, 1852, this paragraph occurs: "The increase of corrupt practices in our elections has become a subject of general and just complaint: it is represented that in some localities the suffrages of considerable numbers of voters have been openly purchased with money. We owe it to ourselves and to posterity, and to the free institutions which we have inherited, to crush this hateful evil in its infancy, before it attains sufficient growth to endanger our political system. The honest and independent exercise of the right of suffrage is a vital principle in the theory of representative government. It is the only enduring foundation for a republic. Not only should the law punish every violation of this principle as a crime against the integrity of the State, but any person concerned in giving or receiving any pecuniary consideration for a vote should, upon challenge, be deprived of the privilege of voting. I submit the subject to your consideration, in the hope that additional remedies may be prescribed and enforced."—The two foregoing extracts do equal credit to the head and heart of Governor Hunt; but what a picture do they portray of the effects of secret voting!

If any efforts were made to stop the rise of corruption, the message from the same Governor the next year will help you assess their success. In his address on January 6, 1852, he stated: "The rise of corrupt practices in our elections has become a widely noted and valid complaint: it is reported that in some areas, the votes of many voters have been openly bought with money. We owe it to ourselves, to future generations, and to the free institutions we've inherited to eliminate this detestable evil in its early stages, before it grows enough to threaten our political system. The honest and independent exercise of the right to vote is a crucial principle in the theory of representative government. It is the only lasting foundation for a republic. Not only should the law treat every violation of this principle as a crime against the integrity of the State, but anyone involved in giving or receiving money for a vote should, upon challenge, lose their right to vote. I present this issue for your consideration, hoping that additional measures can be prescribed and enforced."—The two previous excerpts equally reflect the integrity and conviction of Governor Hunt; yet, what a picture they paint of the consequences of secret voting!

Let us now turn from Governor Hunt, and see what the Press says on the subject. The New York Herald, which if not highly esteemed is at least widely circulated, thus writes in the month of May, 1852:—"Look at the proceedings on Thursday last in the 19th Ward. Voters carried to the ballot-boxes in scores of waggons from, various localities; and, in other wards, hundreds of democrats voting for Scott and for Fillmore, men ignorant and steeped in crime, picked up in all the purlieus of the city and purchased at a dollar a head; and some, it is said, so low as half a dollar, to deposit in the ballot-box a vote they had never seen."—The article then goes on to explain the methods employed at elections—viz., a lazy fellow who wont work, brawls, and drinks, and spouts, and defames every honest man in the ward, till he becomes a semi-deity among the riff-raff, then "his position is found out by those who want to use him. He is for sale to the highest bidder, either to defeat his own party by treachery, or to procure a nomination for any scoundrel who will pay for it. He has no politics of any kind. He has rascality to sell, and there are those who are willing to purchase it, in order that they may traffic in it, and sell it to themselves again at a very high profit.... We have heard of a case in one of the Lower Wards of the city, in which one man got, at the time of the late democratic conventions, the enormous sum of two thousand dollars, out of which it is said he bribed the majority of the electors and kept the balance for himself."

Let’s shift our focus from Governor Hunt and see what the Press has to say on the topic. The New York Herald, which may not be highly regarded but is certainly well-circulated, reported in May 1852:—"Look at what happened last Thursday in the 19th Ward. Voters were carted to the ballot boxes in dozens of wagons from various places; and, in other wards, hundreds of Democrats were voting for Scott and for Fillmore—people who are clueless and steeped in crime, picked up from all the seedy parts of the city and bought for a dollar a person; and some, it’s said, for as little as fifty cents, to cast a vote they had never even seen."—The article goes on to explain the tactics used during elections—specifically, a lazy guy who won’t work, causes fights, drinks, rants, and discredits every honest person in the ward, until he becomes a sort of demigod among the lowlifes. Then "his reputation is discovered by those looking to exploit him. He’s for sale to the highest bidder, either to betray his own party or to secure a nomination for any crook willing to pay for it. He has no political beliefs. He has dishonesty to sell, and there are people ready to buy it, so they can profit by selling it back to themselves at a huge markup... We’ve heard of a case in one of the Lower Wards of the city where one man made a staggering two thousand dollars around the time of the recent Democratic conventions, out of which he allegedly bribed the majority of the voters and kept the rest for himself."

A few paragraphs further on he suggests remedies for the evil;—and what do you suppose they are? First, that honest people should not leave politics to the riff-raff. Secondly, "there ought to be a registration established, by which no man could sail under false colours, or deposit a vote at a primary election, unless he belonged to the ward, and belonged to the party to which he professed to belong." Conceive the state to which secret voting has reduced the wealthy and intelligent city of New York; absolutely, a return to open voting is considered insufficient to reach the vitals of the evil which secrecy has brought about. Here we have proposed as a remedy the compulsory register of political sentiments; and to prove that things are not mending, in the "Retrospect of the year 1852," which forms a leading article in the same journal at the commencement of 1853, after a lengthy panegyric upon the state of America, &c., during 1852, he winds up with these most serious drawbacks to the previous eulogy: "if we are bound to admit with crimson blush that crime is sadly on the increase, and that our municipal institutions have reached the lowest depths of inefficiency and infamy, these but remind us that the work which 1852 has bravely carried on is not yet achieved."—I would wish carefully to guard against being understood to endorse the violent language employed by the New York Herald. I am aware how unsafe a guide the Press ever is in times of political excitement; but after making every reasonable allowance, enough remains to prove the tendency of the secret ballot, corroborated as it is by the authoritative message of the Governor of the State.

A few paragraphs later, he suggests solutions for the problem;—and what do you think they are? First, that honest people shouldn’t leave politics to the troublemakers. Second, “there should be a registration system in place that requires no one to vote under false pretenses or cast a ballot at a primary election unless they actually belong to the ward and the party they claim to belong to.” Consider the situation that secret voting has created in the wealthy and educated city of New York; simply going back to open voting is seen as insufficient to address the deep issues that secrecy has caused. Here we propose as a fix the mandatory registration of political beliefs; and to show that things aren’t improving, in the "Retrospect of the year 1852," which is a leading article in the same journal at the start of 1853, after a long praise of the state of America, etc., during 1852, he concludes with these serious drawbacks to his previous praise: “if we must admit with shame that crime is unfortunately on the rise, and that our local institutions have hit the lowest points of failure and disgrace, these just remind us that the work that 1852 has bravely begun is still not finished.” — I want to be clear that I do not support the extreme language used by the New York Herald. I understand how unreliable the press can be in times of political excitement; but even after considering all reasonable perspectives, there’s enough evidence left to show the negative effects of the secret ballot, supported by the official message from the Governor of the State.

Let us now turn for a moment to that most witty and amusing writer, Sydney Smith. In speaking of Mr. Grote's proposal for the ballot, the author says, "He tells us that the bold cannot be free, and bids us seek for liberty by clothing ourselves in the mask of falsehood, and trampling on the cross of truth;"—and further on, towards the end of the pamphlet, he quotes an authority that Americans must respect—"Old John Randolph, the American orator, was asked one day, at a dinner-party in London, whether the ballot prevailed in his State of Virginia? 'I scarcely believe,' he said, 'we have such a fool in all Virginia as to mention even the vote by ballot; and I do not hesitate to say that the adoption of the ballot would make any nation a set of scoundrels if it did not find them so.'"—John Randolph was right; he felt that it was not necessary that a people should be false in order to be free. Universal hypocrisy would be the consequence of ballot. We should soon say, on deliberation, what David only asserted in his haste, that "all men are liars."[CC]—How strangely prophetic the opinion of John Randolph appears, when read by the light of the New York Herald of 1852.

Let’s take a moment to consider the witty and entertaining writer, Sydney Smith. When discussing Mr. Grote's proposal for the ballot, the author says, "He tells us that the bold cannot be free, and urges us to seek liberty by disguising ourselves with falsehood, and trampling on the cross of truth;"—and later, towards the end of the pamphlet, he cites an authority that Americans should respect—"Old John Randolph, the American orator, was asked one day at a dinner party in London whether the ballot was used in his State of Virginia. 'I hardly believe,' he said, 'we have such a fool in all Virginia as to even mention voting by ballot; and I do not hesitate to say that adopting the ballot would turn any nation into a bunch of scoundrels if it didn’t already find them that way.'"—John Randolph was right; he believed that a people do not need to be deceitful to be free. Universal hypocrisy would be the result of the ballot. We would soon say, upon reflection, what David only claimed in his haste, that "all men are liars."[CC]—How eerily prophetic John Randolph's opinion seems when viewed through the lens of the New York Herald of 1852.

It has always appeared to me that the argument in favour of ballot which is drawn from its use in clubs, if it prove anything at all, is rather against than for it; its value there arises from the fact of the independence of the members, which enables any member if asked by the rejected candidate how he had voted, to decline giving any answer without fear of consequences. Were he dependent, he must either deny the black-ball he gave, had he so voted, or, confessing the fact, he must suffer for it, and silence would be sure to be construed into a black-ball: therefore, before ballot could be of any value to a constituency, they must be independent; and if independent, there would be no need of the ballot. Of course secrecy could be obtained by falsehood. Moreover, the object of it in a club is to keep out of a select society not only those who are considered absolutely offensive, but many with whom, though you might like to meet them in general society, you do not think it desirable to be on more intimate terms; and even in a club, who will deny that it is often used to gratify private malice, and frequently, when candidates are numerous, are black-balls put in to hasten forward the election of friends? While freely confessing and deeply regretting the disgraceful jobbery and bribery which an inquiry into our own elections too often reveals, we ought to be thankful for the light of experience which a contemplation of the elective system of the United States affords, warning us as it does that an imprudent lowering of the franchise and a recourse to the secret ballot do but aggravate the evils they were intended to cure. Before we proceed to lower our franchise, should we not do wisely to try and devise some means for obtaining the votes of those already entitled to vote? Many an honest and industrious artisan at present entitled to a vote will not come to the poll on account of the violence which—if not of the mobular party—he may be subject to; his family depend on his exertions for their daily bread—a broken limb, or any such accident happening to him, may bring the whole family to deep distress, if not to the workhouse. It appears by the Edinburgh Review of October, 1852, that at a previous general election, 40 per cent, of those possessing the privilege did not poll their votes. A hasty lowering of the franchise would certainly increase that number, and thus while losing more votes of the peaceful and industrious citizens, we should be increasing those of the more turbulent, and of those who are excited by designing demagogues.

It has always seemed to me that the argument for the ballot, based on its use in clubs, if it proves anything at all, is actually more against it than for it. Its value in that context comes from the independence of the members, which allows anyone, if asked by a rejected candidate how they voted, to refuse to answer without any fear of repercussions. If the member were dependent, they would either have to deny the black-ball they cast, if that was their vote, or admit it and face consequences; remaining silent would definitely be interpreted as a black-ball. So, for the ballot to have any value for a constituency, they must be independent; and if they are independent, then there would be no need for the ballot. Of course, secrecy could be achieved through dishonesty. Furthermore, the purpose of the ballot in a club is to exclude from a select society not only those who are considered completely unacceptable but also many individuals whom, although you might enjoy interacting with in general social settings, you do not wish to have a closer relationship with. Even in a club, who can deny that it is often used to satisfy personal grudges, and frequently, when there are many candidates, black-balls are cast to expedite the election of friends? While fully acknowledging and regretting the disgraceful corruption and bribery that an investigation into our own elections often uncovers, we should be grateful for the insight offered by examining the electoral system in the United States, which warns us that recklessly lowering the voting franchise and resorting to the secret ballot only worsens the issues they were meant to resolve. Before we consider lowering our voting requirements, shouldn’t we think carefully about finding ways to engage the votes of those already eligible? Many honest and hardworking artisans who currently have the right to vote do not go to the polls because of the violence they may face—if not from the mob, then from other sources; their families rely on their income for daily survival—a broken limb or any such accident could plunge the entire family into serious hardship, if not force them into a workhouse. According to the Edinburgh Review from October 1852, at a previous general election, 40 percent of those eligible didn’t cast their votes. A rushed reduction of the voting franchise would certainly increase that number, meaning while we would lose more votes from peaceful and hardworking citizens, we would see a rise in votes from the more disruptive individuals and those stirred up by manipulative demagogues.

But to return to the United States. In the former edition I omitted to explain that "a Congress" meant a Parliament for two years—the term for which the representatives are elected. One of the sessions is from the first Monday in December to about the end of August, and is called the long session; the other commences the same day, and sits till the 4th March, and is called the short session; but, besides these regular sittings, there may be extra sessions as often as the President thinks fit to assemble Congress. At the time I was in the States, by a fiction very agreeable to the members, if Congress closed the session on Monday, and the President ordered its reassembling on Tuesday, the members were supposed to be at their respective homes, and received mileage payment accordingly. This snug little bonus was called "constructive mileage."

But back to the United States. In the previous edition, I didn’t explain that "a Congress" refers to a Parliament for two years—the time period for which the representatives are elected. One of the sessions runs from the first Monday in December until about the end of August and is called the long session; the other starts on the same day and continues until March 4th, known as the short session. In addition to these regular sessions, there can be extra sessions whenever the President decides to call Congress together. When I was in the States, there was a convenient little rule for the members: if Congress wrapped up its session on Monday and the President called them back on Tuesday, the members were considered to be at home, and they received mileage reimbursement accordingly. This nice little perk was referred to as "constructive mileage."

In the year 1856 an act was passed fixing the payment of members at 1260l. each for their services in each Congress of two years, and abolishing the constructive mileage job. The only deduction from the above is that made for non-attendance of members. The payment is thus arranged:—Each member receives 1l. 13s. 6d. for every day he attends in Congress; the whole number of days a session lasts are calculated at the above rate, and the difference between that amount and 630l. (the half of 1260l.) is a bonus given, at the end of the first year's session, and is in lieu of all further payments for any extra sessions which the President may think it advisable to call during the year. It will thus be seen that each member receives the same sum, minus 1l. 13s. 6d. for every day's non-attendance.

In 1856, a law was passed that set the payment for members at £1260 each for their services during each two-year Congress, and it eliminated the mileage allowance. The only deduction from this amount is for members' absences. The payment is organized as follows: Each member gets £1.13s.6d. for every day they attend Congress; the total number of days in a session is calculated at this rate, and the difference between that total and £630 (half of £1260) is a bonus given at the end of the first year’s session, replacing any further payments for extra sessions that the President may decide to call during the year. So, each member essentially receives the same amount, minus £1.13s.6d. for each day they miss.

Mileage is allowed at the rate of 1l. 13s. 6d.. for every twenty miles distance to and fro, but only for one session each; year. The advantage Texas and Californian members obtain from this liberal allowance is obvious, and its injustice is felt by those who live in the neighbouring States to Washington.

Mileage is allowed at the rate of 1l. 13s. 6d for every twenty miles traveled back and forth, but only for one session each year. The benefit that members from Texas and California gain from this generous allowance is clear, and those living in neighboring states to Washington feel it's unfair.

Now, as travelling, in most parts of the Union, is at the rate of less than 2d. a mile, and living at the rate of two and a half dollars (10s. 6d.) a day, it is obvious that the situation of a representative is advantageous in a pecuniary point of view to those who wish to make a trade of politics. A member coming from a distance, say of 200 miles, and attending 120 days, would have a clear balance of about 150l. left for the rest of the year; and a member from Texas would clear about 500l. How far such a measure is wise, and brings the most desirable men into the public service, let their own countrymen tell. Mr. Venables, of North Carolina, in a speech at Richmond, Virginia (quoted by Mr. Tremenheere) says, "With money enough, any bill can be carried through Congress." No nation—and, least of all, so very sensitive a nation as the United States—would pass an act which could possibly throw a cloud of doubt over the integrity of its representatives were there not some imperative necessity; the act referred to below will be found in page 363 of Appendix to Tremenheere's Constitution of the United States, one clause of which runs thus:—"That any senator or representative in Congress who, after the passage of this act ... shall receive any gratuity, or any share of, or interest in, any claim from any claimant against the United States, &c., on conviction shall pay a fine not exceeding 5000 dollars (1000l.), suffer imprisonment in the Penitentiary, not exceeding one year, or both, as the court in its discretion shall adjudge." Another clause follows, against the knowing and wilful destruction of public documents; another, against any individual who shall tempt any member of the Senate or House of Representatives with bribe of any kind to influence his vote, and against members accepting the same. This act bears date Feb. 26, 1853, and certainly proves that Mr. Venables' assertion had some solid foundation in truth.

Now, with travel costs in most parts of the country being less than 2d a mile, and living expenses around two and a half dollars (10s 6d) a day, it's clear that being a representative can be financially beneficial for those looking to make a career in politics. A member traveling from 200 miles away and attending for 120 days could end up with about 150l left over for the rest of the year; a representative from Texas might make around 500l in profit. How wise this situation is and whether it attracts the best people into public service is something their fellow citizens should assess. Mr. Venables from North Carolina, in a speech in Richmond, Virginia (quoted by Mr. Tremenheere), stated, "With enough money, you can get any bill passed in Congress." No nation—and especially a nation as sensitive as the United States—would approve an act that could cast doubt on the integrity of its representatives unless there was some urgent necessity. The act mentioned below can be found on page 363 of the Appendix to Tremenheere's Constitution of the United States, one clause of which states: "That any senator or representative in Congress who, after the passage of this act ... shall receive any gratuity, or any share of, or interest in, any claim from any claimant against the United States, etc., on conviction shall pay a fine not exceeding 5000 dollars (1000l), suffer imprisonment in the Penitentiary, not exceeding one year, or both, as the court in its discretion shall decide." Another clause addresses the knowing and willful destruction of public documents; another targets individuals who try to bribe any Senate or House member to influence their vote, and against members accepting such bribes. This act was dated February 26, 1853, and certainly demonstrates that Mr. Venables' claim had some solid basis in reality.

It will be remembered by some that Collins, finding the Cunard line of steamers, when supported by Government, too strong for him to contend against, applied to Congress for a Government grant. In obtaining that grant, I do not pretend to say that he, or any one on his behalf, used bribery or corruption, when he took round one of his magnificent vessels to Washington, and feasted Congress on board in a most champagnely style; but this I know, that many Americans were most indignant at the proceeding, for, coupled with the act above referred to, it could not but excite suspicion; and I feel sure, if Cunard had brought round one of his splendid steamers to the Thames, and there feasted the Legislature while his obtaining a Government grant was under discussion, he could not have taken a more effectual method to mar his object. La femme de César ne doit pas être suspecte. Thus, then, as far as we can judge of any advantage to be derived from payment of members, we can see nothing to induce us to adopt such a system; and, if I mistake not, the American himself feels disposed to give it up, believing that the standard of the representative will be raised thereby.

Some may remember that Collins, realizing the Cunard line of steamers, supported by the government, was too strong for him to compete with, applied to Congress for a government grant. While I won't claim that he, or anyone representing him, engaged in bribery or corruption when he brought one of his impressive ships to Washington and entertained Congress on board in a lavish style, I do know that many Americans were outraged by this move. Coupled with the earlier action, it naturally raised suspicions; I’m sure that if Cunard had brought one of his magnificent steamers to the Thames and entertained the legislature while his government grant was being discussed, he couldn't have chosen a more effective way to sabotage his goal. La femme de César ne doit pas être suspecte. So, based on what we can judge about any potential benefits from paying members, we see nothing that would convince us to support such a system; and if I’m not mistaken, the American public seems inclined to abandon it, believing that doing so will elevate the standards of their representatives.

We will now make a few remarks upon a body peculiar to America, and known as "the Lobby." But, first, I would observe that, by a rule in both Houses, changeable at pleasure, ex-members of Congress, ministers, secretaries of legation, &c., are allowed the privilege of coming within the bar to hear debates; and of the people so privileged the Lobby is chiefly composed. They have no counterpart in this country, but may perhaps be said to have a faint and distant resemblance to our Parliamentary agents, and they are in no way recognised by Congress. Their work consists in endeavouring to force all members who purpose presenting public or private bills to employ them, which, of course, involves a "consideration;" and, as their name is "Legion," and their motto on this point "unanimity," they are enabled, owing to their influence with the members, to throw the greatest possible obstruction in the way of most bills which are not passed through their "greased palms." The result need not be described. The correspondent of the Times, who, if report he correct, has held the highest situations a citizen of the United States can hold, states, in a letter to be found in that journal, on the 27th January 1857, that the Minnesota Land Bill had been said, in the House of Representatives, to be supported by bribery, and that one member openly avowed in his seat that he had been offered 1500 dollars for his vote in favour of the bill. The consequence was an inquiry into the alleged charge, and doubtless it will affect the weight of the Lobby. He adds—"The Lobby has, no doubt, great influence on the Legislature, but it is not yet all-powerful." In estimating the effect of a vote, it must be remembered that there are only 234 members in the House of Representatives, and 62 in the Senate; and, to give some idea of the interests concerned, the correspondent states—"It is scarcely an exaggeration to say that the Federal Congress at Washington has a disposing power over twice the amount of national property subject to the votes of the Parliament at Westminster." Those who feel an interest in this subject I would strongly urge to read the whole of the very able letter alluded to.

We will now discuss a group unique to America, known as "the Lobby." First, I should point out that, according to a rule in both Houses, which can be changed at any time, former members of Congress, ministers, secretaries of legation, etc., are allowed the privilege of entering the bar to listen to debates; and the Lobby is mainly made up of these privileged individuals. They don't have a direct equivalent in this country, but they might vaguely resemble our Parliamentary agents, and Congress does not formally recognize them. Their role is to try to pressure all members who plan to present public or private bills to hire them, which obviously involves a "consideration;" and since their name is "Legion" and their motto regarding this is "unanimity," they can use their influence with the members to create significant obstacles for most bills that don’t go through their "greased palms." The outcome doesn’t need to be detailed. The correspondent of the Times, who reportedly has held the highest positions a citizen of the United States can attain, notes in a letter published in that journal on January 27, 1857, that the Minnesota Land Bill was said in the House of Representatives to be backed by bribery, and one member openly stated from his seat that he had been offered $1,500 for his vote in favor of the bill. This led to an investigation into the alleged charge, which will likely impact the influence of the Lobby. He adds, "The Lobby undoubtedly has significant influence on the Legislature, but it is not yet all-powerful." When considering the impact of a vote, it’s important to remember that there are only 234 members in the House of Representatives and 62 in the Senate; to provide some context regarding the interests at stake, the correspondent notes, "It is hardly an exaggeration to say that the Federal Congress in Washington has authority over twice the amount of national property subject to the votes of the Parliament at Westminster." For those interested in this topic, I strongly encourage you to read the entire excellent letter mentioned.

I have before spoken of the very great readiness with which any stranger gains admittance to Congress to listen to the debates. As a broad feature, I believe their discussions are carried on in a sober, practical, business-like manner; nevertheless, most outrageous scenes have occurred. I subjoin the following extract, not from any one sentence it contains, but from its continuity, as a proof that the tone of the House is not worthy of the dignity of so great a country. A member of any community may get up and use the most gross and offensive language; but if the offender be immediately called to order, and made to retract the offensive expressions, the community thus vindicates its character. Should, however, the most gross and offensive language be used by two members for any length of time without any interference, reprobation, retraction, or punishment, the community as a body must fairly be considered, by their silence, as endorsing such conduct.

I’ve mentioned before how easily anyone can get into Congress to listen to the debates. Generally, I think their discussions are conducted in a serious, practical, and professional way; however, there have been some outrageous incidents. I’m including the following excerpt, not because of any single sentence it contains, but because of its overall context, as evidence that the tone of the House doesn’t reflect the dignity of such a great country. Any member of the community can stand up and use the most crude and offensive language; but if that person is immediately called out of order and made to take back those words, the community defends its reputation. However, if two members use offensive language for an extended period without any intervention, disapproval, retraction, or punishment, the community must fairly be seen as endorsing such behavior by their silence.

The extract is taken from that widely circulating journal, "the Illustrated London News:—

The extract is taken from that popular magazine, "Illustrated London News:—

"In the House of Representatives at Washington, on the 11th ult., the following amusing but disgraceful scene occurred between two of the members—Messrs. Stanly and Giddings. The former having charged the latter with uttering a falsehood, the following conversation ensued:—

"In the House of Representatives in Washington, on the 11th of last month, an amusing yet shameful scene took place between two members—Messrs. Stanly and Giddings. After the former accused the latter of lying, the following conversation took place:—"

"Mr. Stanly: 'It is usual for one who has no regard for the decencies of life to relieve himself from responsibility by pronouncing statements false, and it is characteristic of the man who sneaked away from this House, and took his pay for work which he did not do.

"Mr. Stanly: 'It's common for someone who doesn't care about the basic decencies of life to escape responsibility by making false statements, and that's typical of the guy who sneaked out of this House and collected his pay for work he didn't actually do."

"Mr. Giddings: 'When the gentleman descends to low vulgarity, I cannot follow him, I protest against Dough-faces prompting the gentleman from South Carolina.

"Mr. Giddings: 'When the gentleman resorts to crude vulgarity, I can't keep up with him. I object to Dough-faces influencing the gentleman from South Carolina."

"Mr. Stanly: 'It is the business of a scavenger to have anything to do with him, and I will have to wash my hands after handling him; but the thing has to be done, as he has thrust himself on us as a kind of censor. It is a small business for me, and I don't know how I can descend any lower than to take hold of the hon. member for Ohio. (Cry of 'Good.')

"Mr. Stanly: 'It's the job of a scavenger to deal with him, and I'll need to clean my hands after handling him; but it has to be done since he's forced himself on us as a sort of critic. It's a small task for me, and I don’t see how I can sink any lower than dealing with the honorable member from Ohio. (Cheers of 'Good.')"

"Mr. Giddings: 'Will you hear me?

"Mr. Giddings: 'Will you listen to me?

"Mr. Stanly: 'Nobody wants to hear you, but I will indulge you.

"Mr. Stanly: 'No one wants to listen to you, but I’ll humor you."

"Mr. Giddings: 'The gentleman is barking up the wrong tree.

"Mr. Giddings: 'The guy is looking in the wrong place.

"Mr. Stanly: 'The galled jade winces again.

"Mr. Stanly: 'The hurt horse winces again.

"Mr. Giddings: 'The gentleman sha'n't crack the overseer's lash to put me down.

"Mr. Giddings: 'The guy isn't going to use the overseer's whip to take me down."

"Mr. Stanly: 'I hope that the gentleman will not gnash his teeth so hard; he might hurt himself. Who is here playing the overseer over white men—who but he, who is throwing his filthy gall and assailing everybody as Northern Whig Dough-faces, and what he calls the vile slave-holders? He is the only man who acts in that way. We don't raise the overseer's lash over our slaves in North Carolina. If that member was in the southern country, nobody would own him as a black man with a white skin—(laughter)—but he would be suffered to run wild as a free negro, and in the course of three weeks he would be brought up to the whipping-post and lashed, for stealing or slandering his neighbours. (Laughter.) If I say that he is a gentleman, I tell a falsehood.

"Mr. Stanly: 'I hope the gentleman isn’t gritting his teeth too hard; he might injure himself. Who is here acting like the overseer over white men—who but him, throwing around his nasty insults and attacking everyone as Northern Whig Dough-faces and what he calls the nasty slaveholders? He’s the only one who behaves like that. We don’t use the overseer's whip on our workers in North Carolina. If that member were down in the South, no one would recognize him as a black man with white skin—(laughter)—but he would be allowed to run around like a free black person, and in three weeks, he would end up at the whipping post for stealing or slandering his neighbors. (Laughter.) If I say he’s a gentleman, I’d be lying.

"The Speaker (to Mr. Stanly)—'Will the gentleman suspend for a moment?

"The Speaker (to Mr. Stanly)—'Could the gentleman hold on for a moment?

"Mr. Stanly: 'We ought to suspend that fellow (pointing to Mr. Giddings) by the neck. (Laughter.)

"Mr. Stanly: 'We should hang that guy (pointing to Mr. Giddings) by the neck. (Laughter.)

"Mr. Giddings: 'The gentleman from North Carolina reminds me of the boy who turned round so fast that the hind part of his breeches was on both sides. (Laughter.) The gentleman says that I was at Norristown, too; but where was he and the members of the House? Why, drinking their grog. (Laughter.)

"Mr. Giddings: 'The guy from North Carolina reminds me of the kid who spun around so quickly that his pants ended up on both sides. (Laughter.) He claims I was at Norristown too, but where were he and the other members of the House? Oh, just drinking their drinks. (Laughter.)"

"Mr. Stanly: 'I charge the official reporters not to let his (Mr. Giddings') felonious hand touch one word of what I say, for we know how he on a former occasion misrepresented my colleague from the Orange district, and his own colleague from the Chillicothe district, having altered his own speech after he got to his room with his coloured friends. (Laughter.) He talks about my associates: but has anybody ever seen him in private decent company? Free negroes may call to see him. He does not let his right hand know what his left doeth. He alludes to my absence; but I have not set myself up as a standard. I don't say I'm always in the house as I ought to be. He says we were here drinking our grog during Christmas times. Where was he? In Philadelphia, drinking beer and eating oysters with free negroes. (Laughter.) Which was the best off? Judge ye. (Laughter.) He thinks he was better off than we were. [Mr. Stanly paused, and, looking towards Mr. Preston King, who was standing near Sir. Giddings, remarked, raising his voice to a higher pitch, "Help him out; he needs a little more poison." (Voices, "Ha, ha! Good! Ha, ha!")] I quit this subject in disgust. I find that I have been in a dissecting-room, cutting up a dead dog. I will treat him as an insane man, who was never taught the decencies of life, proprieties of conduct—whose associations show that he never mingled with gentlemen. Let him rave on till doomsday.'

"Mr. Stanly: 'I urge the official reporters not to let his (Mr. Giddings') criminal hand alter a single word of what I’m saying, because we know how he previously misrepresented my colleague from the Orange district, and even his own colleague from the Chillicothe district, after he changed his speech once he got to his room with his colored friends. (Laughter.) He talks about my associates, but has anyone ever seen him in respectable company? Free Black people may come to visit him. He doesn't let his right hand know what his left hand is doing. He mentions my absence, but I haven't claimed to be a model. I'm not saying I'm always where I should be in the house. He claims we were here drinking during Christmas. Where was he? In Philadelphia, drinking beer and eating oysters with free Black people. (Laughter.) Who was better off? You decide. (Laughter.) He thinks he was living better than we were. [Mr. Stanly paused, and, looking towards Mr. Preston King, who was standing near Mr. Giddings, remarked, raising his voice, "Help him out; he needs a little more poison." (Voices, "Ha, ha! Good! Ha, ha!")] I’m done with this topic in disgust. I feel like I've been in a dissecting room, dissecting a dead dog. I will treat him as an insane person, who was never taught the basics of life or proper behavior—whose associations show that he never interacted with gentlemen. Let him rant on until the end of time.'

"The conversation then ceased."

"The conversation then stopped."

Any one who has seen much of American gentlemen, must know that such language as the above contains would be reprobated by them fully as strongly as by any gentleman in this country. To doubt that would be to do them a gross injustice. Does not, therefore, the recurrence of such scenes go far to prove, that the advance of ultra-democratic principles has the effect of lowering the tone of the Representative Chamber, and that men of liberal education and gentlemanly bearing do not constitute the majority in that House? In the days of Washington, would any member have dared to use, or would any other member have for a moment tolerated, such language? It is but justice to say, that the tone of the Senate Chamber is far more dignified; and many who have been members of that body have established a world-wide reputation both as orators and statesmen.

Anyone who has spent time among American gentlemen knows that the kind of language mentioned above would be condemned by them as strongly as by any gentleman in this country. To think otherwise would be a serious injustice. Doesn’t the frequent occurrence of such scenes demonstrate that the rise of extremely democratic principles lowers the standards of the Representative Chamber, and that educated and refined individuals do not make up the majority in that House? In Washington’s day, would any member have dared to use, or would any other member have even tolerated, such language? It’s fair to say that the tone of the Senate Chamber is much more dignified, and many who have served in that body have gained a global reputation as both speakers and statesmen.

Let us now turn for a few minutes to that important subject, the Judiciary of the States, one peculiar feature of which is, its being a co-ordinate branch of the Legislature. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest tribunal in the country; it consists of a Chief Justice and eight associate Justices, the Attorney-General, a reporter, and a clerk. All questions affecting foreign ambassadors, consuls, &c., are tried before this court; and it is a final court of appeal in cases involving constitutional questions, and various others, too long to enumerate here. It has even the power of annulling the acts of the Federal Congress at Washington, if such acts are contrary to the Constitution.

Let’s take a moment to discuss an important topic: the Judiciary of the States. One unique aspect of this system is that it is a separate branch of the Legislature. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the country; it is made up of a Chief Justice and eight associate Justices, along with the Attorney-General, a reporter, and a clerk. All cases involving foreign ambassadors, consuls, etc., are heard in this court, which serves as the final court of appeal for constitutional issues and many other matters that are too numerous to list here. It also has the authority to nullify acts of the Federal Congress in Washington if those acts violate the Constitution.

The following article in the Constitution regulates the terms upon which alone any change may be made, and which is of so peculiar and conservative a character that I insert it in full:—

The following article in the Constitution outlines the specific conditions under which any changes can be made, and it is so unique and conservative that I will include it in full:—

"ARTICLE V.—Amendment Power."
"The Congress, whenever two-thirds of both Houses consider it necessary,
necessary, will propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the
application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the various states,
will call a convention to propose amendments, which, in either
This will be valid for all intents and purposes as part of this
the states, will become effective.
the different States, or by conventions in three-fourths of them, as the
Either mode of ratification may be proposed by Congress;
as long as no changes are made before the year one
1808, shall in any way impact the first
and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article, and that
No state, without its consent, shall be denied its equal voting rights.
in the Senate.

The foregoing article is a remarkable instance of prudence and forethought, and acts as the strongest safeguard against hasty measures, which in times of great excitement may sometimes obtain a majority that would afterwards be regretted by all parties. If the principle involved in any question is really felt to be of vital importance, the majority can dissolve the Union if they consider the object in view worth the sacrifice.

The previous article is a great example of careful planning and consideration, serving as a solid protection against impulsive actions that might gain majority support during times of heightened emotion, only to be looked back on with regret by everyone involved. If the principle at stake in any issue is truly seen as crucial, the majority can break apart the Union if they believe the goal is worth the cost.

The salary of the Chief Justice is about 1050l. a-year. This court is, I believe, invariably composed of men of the highest talent and integrity; their appointment is from the President, and endorsed by the Senate, and their tenure of office is "during good behaviour."[CD] There has, fortunately, been no change in the manner or term of these appointments; but, in the different States, the democratic mania has removed the old landmarks of prudence bequeathed to them by their fathers. Mr. Tremenheere tells, that in 1833 only 5 States out of the 24 had adopted the principle of electing Judges, and appointing them for a term of years; in 1844, 12 States out of the 29 had adopted the principle; and in 1853, 22 out of the 31 States had come to the same resolution. We surely have in these facts a most important warning of the danger of introducing too much of the democratic element into the constitution of any country. Reflect, if but for a moment, on the danger to the community, where the selection of the Judges of the land may be guided by political rancour or public clamour; the bare knowledge that such may be the case, even if the purity of the masses be so great as not to admit of such sinister influence, the bare possibility, I say, is calculated to lower the respect in which it is most desirable the judiciary should ever be held,[CE] and to deter the most pure and high-minded citizens from offering their services. The salaries of the Judges range from 250l. to 400l. a-year.

The Chief Justice's salary is about £1,050 a year. This court is, I believe, always made up of individuals of the highest talent and integrity; they are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, and they serve "during good behavior." There has thankfully been no change in how these appointments are made or the terms of service; however, in various States, the democratic trend has shattered the old safeguards established by their predecessors. Mr. Tremenheere notes that in 1833, only 5 out of 24 States had adopted the principle of electing Judges and appointing them for a set number of years; in 1844, 12 out of 29 States had done so; and by 1853, 22 out of 31 States had made the same decision. These facts serve as a crucial warning about the risks of infusing too much democracy into the Constitution of any country. Consider, even for a moment, the danger to society if the selection of the nation's Judges could be swayed by political jealousy or public outcry; just the knowledge that this could happen, even if the masses are too pure to let such negative influences affect them, is enough to lower the esteem in which we should hold the judiciary and discourage the most honorable and principled citizens from offering their services. The salaries of Judges range from £250 to £400 a year.

The next point to which I would call attention, is to be found in Art. I., sect. 6, of the Constitution of the United States, the last clause of which runs thus:—"No person holding any office under the United States shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office." This was probably one of the most extraordinary blunders such an able body of men as the framers of the Constitution ever made; and if their object was to guard against corruption, and the undue influence of the leading men of the country, it has most signally failed, as the Act before referred to, of February, 1853, fully testifies. Only conceive the effect of excluding all the Cabinet and high functionaries from seats in the Lords and Commons; conceive the great statesmen of this country being obliged to hand over the introduction of most important measures, and the defence and explanation of them, to other hands. On this point, Mr. Justice Story remarks: "Thus, that open and public responsibility for measures, which properly belongs to the executive in all governments, especially in a republican government, as its greatest security and strength, is completely done away. The executive is compelled to resort to secret and unseen influence,—to private interviews and private arrangements,—to accomplish its own appropriate purposes, instead of proposing and sustaining its own duties and measures by a bold and manly appeal to the nation in the face of its representatives. One consequence of this state of things is, that there never can be traced home to the executive any responsibility for the measures which are planned and carried at its suggestion. Another consequence will be—if it has not yet been—that measures will be adopted or defeated by private intrigues, political combinations, irresponsible recommendations, by all the blandishments of office, and all the deadening weight of silent patronage; ... ministers may conceal or evade any expression of their opinions."

The next point I want to highlight is found in Article I, Section 6, of the United States Constitution, with the last clause stating: "No person holding any office under the United States shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office." This was likely one of the most astonishing mistakes made by such a capable group of individuals as the framers of the Constitution. If their aim was to guard against corruption and the undue influence of the nation's leaders, it has failed dramatically, as the Act referenced from February 1853 clearly shows. Just imagine the impact of excluding all Cabinet members and high officials from seats in the House of Lords and House of Commons; imagine the country's great statesmen being forced to hand over the introduction of critical measures, along with their defense and explanation, to others. On this matter, Mr. Justice Story notes: "Thus, that open and public accountability for measures, which rightly belongs to the executive in all governments, especially in a republican government, as its greatest security and strength, is completely eliminated. The executive is forced to rely on secret and unseen influence—on private meetings and private arrangements—to achieve its own necessary goals, rather than presenting and defending its duties and measures through a bold and confident appeal to the nation in front of its representatives. One consequence of this situation is that accountability for the measures planned and executed at its suggestion can never be traced back to the executive. Another consequence—which may already be the case—is that measures will be accepted or blocked through private schemes, political alliances, unaccountable recommendations, through all the flattery of office, and all the oppressive weight of silent patronage; ... ministers may hide or avoid expressing their views."

In charity it should be presumed that in all nations which possess anything worthy of the name of free institutions, the ablest men of the political majority constitute the Cabinet; and, by the enactment we are considering, all this talent is excluded from the councils of the nation, whereas all the talent of the Opposition may be there arrayed against their measures. I confess it is beyond my penetration, to see how this can be reconciled to justice or common sense; in no one principle of their Government did they more completely ignore the wisdom and experience of the mother country, and in the object they had in view they appear to have most completely failed. It is but fair to the democrats to say it is no act of theirs; they inherited the misfortune, and are likely to keep it, as it is one of the fundamental principles of their Constitution, and they have a salutary dread—much to their praise—of tinkering up any flaw they find in that document, lest in mending one hole they make two. They have, as a nation, so greatly prospered under its combined enactments, and possess such an unlimited independence in their individual States, that although the exclusion of the Cabinet is now very generally admitted to be an error, I saw no inclination to moot the question; probably, lest other questions affecting the slave and non-slave-holding States might be brought on the boards, and again disturb the bonds of union.

In charity, it should be assumed that in all nations with genuine free institutions, the most capable people in the political majority make up the Cabinet. With the legislation we're discussing, all this talent is left out of the national discussions, while all the talent from the Opposition can work against their proposals. Honestly, I can't understand how this could be seen as just or sensible. In no aspect of their Government did they more completely overlook the wisdom and experience of the mother country, and they seem to have utterly failed in their intended goals. It's only fair to mention that this isn't the democrats' doing; they inherited this problem and are likely to keep it, as it’s one of the core principles of their Constitution. They have a healthy fear—rightly so—of trying to fix any issues they find in that document, worried that fixing one problem could create two more. As a nation, they have thrived under its combined laws and enjoy significant independence in their individual States, so even though excluding the Cabinet is now widely recognized as a mistake, there’s no interest in reopening the discussion. Probably because they fear that other issues regarding slave and non-slave-holding States might come up and again threaten their unity.

Another very remarkable—and in a Republic anomalous—feature in the government, is the power of the President, who, by the Constitution, is enabled during his four years' tenure of office to rule in total opposition to the majority, obstructing all the measures they may bring forward, unless the majority amounts to two-thirds in both Houses of Congress.

Another very notable—and in a Republic unusual—aspect of the government is the power of the President, who, according to the Constitution, can during his four-year term of office govern in complete opposition to the majority, thwarting all the measures they propose, unless the majority reaches two-thirds in both Houses of Congress.

Article I., section 7, clause 2, runs thus:—"Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approves, he shall sign it, but if not, he shall return it with his objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to re-consider it. If after such re-consideration two-thirds of that House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be re-considered, and if approved by two-thirds of that House, it shall become a law," &c.

Article I., section 7, clause 2, states:—"Every bill that has passed the House of Representatives and the Senate must be presented to the President of the United States before it can become law; if he approves it, he will sign it, but if he does not, he will return it with his objections to the House in which it originated, who will record the objections in their journal and proceed to reconsider it. If, after this reconsideration, two-thirds of that House agree to pass the bill, it will be sent, along with the objections, to the other House, where it will also be reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of that House, it will become law," &c.

This power of the President has been used by Washington, Jackson, Tyler, and Polk; particularly by Tyler, who opposed the wishes of the majority even when those wishes were backed by his own ministry. During the discussions on the Constitution, many of the wisest heads at that eventful period desired to establish the Presidency for life, but eventually the term of four years was agreed upon; and if such powers of obstructing the wishes of a majority were to accompany the office, it certainly was a prudent conclusion they arrived at. In a densely populated community like Great Britain, such powers, whether in the hands of the sovereign or the ministers, would produce a revolution in much less time than four years. It may, however, be questioned, whether these powers are not productive of evil, by rendering necessary such frequent elections for the Presidency. On this point, Mr. Justice Story states: "The inconvenience of such frequently recurring elections of the chief magistrate, by generating factions, combining intrigues, and agitating the public mind, seems not hitherto to have attracted as much attention, as it deserves." And Chancellor Kent remarks, that "the election of a supreme executive magistrate for a whole nation affects so many interests, addresses itself so strongly to popular passions, and holds out such powerful temptations to ambition, that it necessarily becomes a strong trial to public virtue, and even hazardous to public tranquillity."

This power of the President has been used by Washington, Jackson, Tyler, and Polk; especially by Tyler, who went against the wishes of the majority even when those wishes were supported by his own cabinet. During the debates about the Constitution, many of the brightest minds at that critical time wanted to establish a lifetime presidency, but they ultimately settled on a four-year term; and if such powers to oppose the majority were to come with the office, it was definitely a wise decision they made. In a densely populated society like Great Britain, such powers, whether in the hands of the monarch or the ministers, would lead to a revolution in far less than four years. However, it can be questioned whether these powers actually cause harm by making frequent presidential elections necessary. On this issue, Mr. Justice Story notes: "The inconvenience of such frequently recurring elections of the chief magistrate, by generating factions, combining intrigues, and agitating the public mind, seems not hitherto to have attracted as much attention, as it deserves." And Chancellor Kent remarks that "the election of a supreme executive magistrate for a whole nation affects so many interests, addresses itself so strongly to popular passions, and holds out such powerful temptations to ambition, that it necessarily becomes a strong trial to public virtue, and even hazardous to public tranquillity."

There is another evil which attends these frequent elections of the chief magistrate—namely, the enormous patronage at his disposal, and the mass of jobbery and corruption to which the exercise of it almost invariably leads. Besides the appointment of nearly ever military, naval, civil, judicial, and revenue-collecting official—some of these subject, it is true to the approval of the Senate—Mr. Justice Story remarks, that with regard to inferior offices "his patronage probably includes ninety-nine out of every hundred of the lucrative offices of the government." His great rival in patronage is the Postmaster-General, who has power to appoint and remove all deputy-postmasters, which, as the number of post-offices is 22,688, amounts to something considerable.

There’s another issue that comes with the frequent elections of the chief magistrate—specifically, the vast amount of patronage he has and the widespread jobbery and corruption that typically follow. In addition to appointing almost all military, naval, civil, judicial, and revenue-collecting officials—some of whom need Senate approval—Mr. Justice Story points out that when it comes to lower-level positions, "his patronage probably includes ninety-nine out of every hundred of the lucrative jobs in the government." His main competitor in terms of patronage is the Postmaster-General, who can appoint and remove all deputy postmasters, which is significant given that there are 22,688 post offices.

This power was doubtless intended for the public good, and in order that incompetent or inefficient persons should be removed. To the honour of Washington, it is recorded that during his eight years' Presidency only nine removals took place. To President Jackson they are indebted, as I have before remarked, for the introduction of the present corrupt system. According to Justice Story, on his entering office he removed 233 employés; since then, the snowball has been steadily increasing till the present moment; it has now reached an amount which it would require Mr. Babbage's machine to calculate. Who can doubt that such vast patronage, has far more influence in the selection of a President, than any personal qualification for the high and important post? Nothing could prove more clearly that such influences are paramount to all others than the last election. There were eight candidates on the democratic side, of whom General Pierce was not one; all the eight had their special friends, and each party was loth to lose the chance of patronage which their friend's election might reasonably lead them to hope for. Thus they fought so vigorously that there was no chance of any one having the requisite number of votes, i.e., a majority of the whole number polled.

This power was definitely meant for the public good and to ensure that incompetent or ineffective people could be removed. In honor of Washington, it's noted that during his eight years in office, only nine removals happened. To President Jackson, as I mentioned before, we owe the introduction of the current corrupt system. According to Justice Story, when he took office, he dismissed 233 employees; since then, the number has steadily increased to the point where it would take Mr. Babbage's machine to calculate it. Who can doubt that this vast patronage has much more influence on the choice of a President than any personal qualifications for such a high and important position? Nothing demonstrates more clearly that these influences outweigh all others than the last election. There were eight candidates on the Democratic side, none of whom was General Pierce; each of the eight had their own special supporters, and each group was reluctant to miss out on the chance for patronage that their candidate's election might reasonably promise. So they fought so hard that there was no chance for anyone to secure the necessary votes, i.e., a majority of the total votes cast.

The Convention being deputed by the different States to select from the candidates already in the field, how do they get out of the difficulty at the eleventh hour? They take upon themselves to nominate a candidate for the Presidential chair, who was not fettered by any particular followers, and from whom all parties hoped they would receive some share of the loaves and fishes as a reward for their support. The electors endorsed the new selection of the Convention, and General Pierce, lately commanding a brigade in the Mexican war, was elected by a most astounding majority. Scarcely any President was ever elected with such all-but unanimity, and the Press was equally undivided in its praises. Every paper I read, in every place I passed through, was full of the most unbounded eulogy. But mark the change a few months made. Before the end of the year, one-half of that Press, which had bespattered him with such fulsome adulation during the honeymoon of which his inauguration was the centre, were filling their columns with long and loud complaints, if not abuse. And what was the chief burden of their invective? It was the manner in which he distributed his patronage. In short, they were discontented with the share they received of the loaves and fishes, and thus the target of their adulation during the summer of hope, became the butt for their abuse in the winter of disappointment.

The Convention, put together by the different States to choose from the candidates already in the running, how did they resolve their dilemma at the last moment? They decided to nominate a candidate for the presidency who wasn't tied to any specific group of supporters, hoping that all parties would get a piece of the rewards for their backing. The electors accepted the new pick from the Convention, and General Pierce, who had recently led a brigade in the Mexican war, was elected by an astonishing majority. Almost no president had ever been elected with such near-unanimity, and the media was equally united in its praise. Every publication I read and every place I traveled through was filled with boundless compliments. But look how things changed in just a few months. By the end of the year, half of that media, which had showered him with such excessive praise during the honeymoon phase around his inauguration, was now filling their pages with extensive and loud complaints, if not outright hostility. And what was the main focus of their criticism? It was how he handled his appointments. In short, they were unhappy with the portion they received of the political rewards, and so the person they had praised during a season of hope became the target of their criticism in a winter of disappointment.

There is another subject connected with these elections, which speaks with warning voice against the presumable advantage of democracy. I would not be misunderstood as casting the slightest reflection upon the amiable qualities, intellectual powers, or administrative talents of any American citizen who has been raised to the Presidency during later years. Let any candid reader, however, whether English or American, look at the following lists of Presidents since the Constitution, and he cannot fail to observe that while the franchise was restricted in nearly every State, those called to that high post were the marked men of the highest talent in the country—men whose reputation and abilities were patent to the whole community; while, with the increase of democracy, those selected during later years are men who, whatever their virtues and capabilities, were comparatively unknown. In the case of General Franklin Pierce, he was never even named by the community; but, as we have shown, was selected by the Convention at the eleventh hour, as a compromise of political partisanship. Let us not forget, that while some of the later Presidents were elected, Calhoun, Clay, and Webster—whose names are the just pride of the Republic, and household words in every family—were passed over.[CF] Surely these simple facts may afford us subject for profitable reflection.

There’s another aspect connected to these elections that warns against the supposed benefits of democracy. I don’t mean to imply any negativity towards the admirable qualities, intellect, or leadership skills of any American citizen who has held the Presidency in recent years. However, any honest reader, whether from England or America, looking at the following list of Presidents since the Constitution will notice that when voting rights were limited in almost every state, those appointed to that high office were well-known individuals with outstanding talent—people whose reputations and abilities were recognized by everyone. In contrast, with the rise of democracy, those chosen in more recent years are individuals who, no matter their good qualities and skills, were relatively unknown. Take General Franklin Pierce, for instance; he was never even mentioned by the public but was, as we’ve shown, chosen by the Convention at the last minute as a compromise between political factions. Let’s not forget that while some of the more recent Presidents were elected, figures like Calhoun, Clay, and Webster—names that are the pride of our Republic and familiar to every household—were overlooked.[CF] Surely these facts provide us with a topic for thoughtful consideration.


We will now pass on from the Governor of the Republic to the Governors of individual States. Their salaries vary in different States, and range from 300l. to 2000l. a-year. Their election is in some States by the people, in others by the legislature: their term of office varies; in some States the election is annual, and in all for a very limited period; and under them each separate State has its own House of Representatives and its Senate. The chief power, which resides in the Governor alone, is that of pardon; and here we may observe, that it is only reasonable to suppose that so enlightened a community as the United States would not for any considerable number of years have tolerated the most flagrant abuse of such a power as that of pardon; and consequently that if it be found that such abuse do now exist, it must have grown with the ever-growing democratic element.

We will now move on from the Governor of the Republic to the Governors of individual States. Their salaries differ across States, ranging from 300l to 2000l a year. In some States, they're elected by the people, while in others, it's done by the legislature. Their terms vary; in some States, elections are held annually, and in all cases, they serve for a limited period. Each State has its own House of Representatives and Senate. The key power that belongs exclusively to the Governor is the ability to grant pardons. It's reasonable to believe that a society as enlightened as the United States would not tolerate serious abuse of the pardon power for long. Therefore, if such abuses are currently happening, they must be a result of the increasing democratic influence.

Mr. Tremenheere quotes largely from a work by Dr. Lieber, Professor of Political Philosophy in the State College of South Carolina. Among others of a similar character, the following passage occurs:—"I consider the indiscriminate pardoning so frequent in many parts of the United States, one of the most hostile things, now at work in our country, to a perfect government of law." He elsewhere states "that the New York Committee had ascertained that there are men who make a regular trade of procuring pardons for convicts by which they support themselves." Further on he says, "To this statement we have now to add the still more appalling fact, which we would pass over in silence if our duty permitted it, that but a short time ago the Governor of a large State—a State among the foremost in prison discipline—was openly and widely accused of taking money for his pardons. We have it not in our power to state whether this be true or not, but it is obvious that a state of things which allows suspicions and charges so degrading and so ruinous to a healthy condition, ought not to be borne with." He then subjoins this note:—"While these sheets are going through the press, the papers report that the Governor of a large State has pardoned thirty criminals, among whom were some of the worst characters, at one stroke, on leaving the gubernatorial chair."—Among the conclusions Dr. Lieber draws on this point, is the following astounding one—"That the executive in our country is so situated that, in the ordinary course of things, it cannot be expected of him that he will resist the abuse; at least, that he will not resist it in many cases."

Mr. Tremenheere quotes extensively from a work by Dr. Lieber, Professor of Political Philosophy at the State College of South Carolina. Among other similar points, the following passage stands out: “I view the indiscriminate pardoning that occurs frequently in many parts of the United States as one of the most damaging things currently affecting our country’s ability to maintain a strong system of law.” He also notes that “the New York Committee discovered that there are individuals who make a regular business out of securing pardons for convicts, using this practice to support themselves.” He continues, “To this statement, we must now add the even more shocking fact that, not long ago, the Governor of a large State — a State known for its prison discipline — was openly and widely accused of accepting money for his pardons. We cannot confirm whether this is true or not, but it’s clear that a situation allowing such degrading suspicions and accusations, which are detrimental to a healthy system, should not be tolerated.” He then adds this note: “While these pages are being printed, newspapers report that the Governor of a large State has pardoned thirty criminals, including some of the worst offenders, all at once as he leaves office.” Among the conclusions Dr. Lieber draws on this issue is this startling one: “The executive in our country is positioned in such a way that, under normal circumstances, it cannot be expected that he will resist this abuse; at least, it is unlikely he will do so in many cases.”

The foregoing extracts are certainly entitled to no small weight when it is remembered they come from the pen of a republican professor, writing upon "Civil Liberty and Self-government." I do not pretend to say that such gross cases as those referred to by him came within my cognizance during my travels, but I most certainly did hear charges made against governors, in more than one instance, of granting pardons through corrupt influence.

The previous extracts definitely hold significant weight, especially considering they are written by a republican professor discussing "Civil Liberty and Self-government." I won't claim that the extreme cases he referenced came to my attention during my travels, but I certainly did hear allegations against governors, in more than one case, of giving pardons due to corrupt influence.

I have now given a cursory review of the leading features in the executive of the United States; and I have endeavoured, while doing so, to point out the effects which the gradual inroads of the democratic element have produced. The subject is one of the deepest interest to us as Englishmen, inasmuch as it is the duty of every government to enlarge, as far as is consistent with the welfare of the nation, the liberty of the subject. The foregoing remarks on the constitution of the United States appear to me conclusive as to one fact—viz., that the democratic element may be introduced so largely as that, despite a high standard of national education and worldly prosperity, its influence will produce the most pernicious effect upon the government of the country.

I have now provided a brief overview of the main aspects of the executive branch of the United States; and I have tried to highlight the effects that the gradual rise of the democratic element has had. This topic is of great interest to us as Englishmen, as it is the responsibility of every government to expand the freedom of its citizens as much as is compatible with the nation's well-being. The previous comments on the Constitution of the United States seem to me to confirm one thing—namely, that the democratic element can be introduced to such an extent that, even with a high level of national education and economic success, its influence will negatively impact the country's government.

This truth cannot be too strongly brought forward, for undoubtedly change is the mania of the day; and as, in a free country, all constitutional changes must have a liberal tendency, it behoves our legislators to study deeply and patiently the effect produced upon any country whose constitution is more democratic than our own, so as to enable them, while steadily advancing with the age, to know when the well-being of their country requires them, as true patriots, to resist those measures which threaten injury to the social fabric committed to their guidance. No field can afford them more profitable subjects for reflection than the United States. Independent of the fact that her institutions are more democratic than our own, she possesses natural advantages that enable her to carry them out, such as we do not; and, therefore, the British statesman may always study her career with profit when any great liberal movement is being agitated in his own country.

This truth can’t be emphasized enough, because change is definitely the craze today; and in a free country, all constitutional changes should lean toward liberalism. It’s crucial for our lawmakers to carefully and patiently examine the impact of constitutions in countries that are more democratic than ours. This way, they can, while progressing with the times, understand when the well-being of their nation requires them— as true patriots— to push back against any measures that could harm the social fabric they're responsible for. No topic can provide more valuable insights than the United States. Aside from the fact that its institutions are more democratic than ours, it also has natural advantages that allow it to implement those institutions in ways that we cannot. Therefore, British politicians can always learn from American experiences when significant liberal movements arise in their own country.

Lest any one should be disposed to imagine that the statements I have made, or the deductions I have drawn, are merely the prejudices of a traveller brought up under a constitutional monarchy, I will add a passage showing the conclusions at which one of the ablest men in America has arrived.

Lest anyone thinks that what I’ve said or the conclusions I’ve reached are just the opinions of a traveler raised in a constitutional monarchy, I’ll include a quote that reflects the conclusions drawn by one of the most capable individuals in America.

Bishop Hopkins, in an address delivered before the House of Convocation of Trinity College, Hartford, after eulogizing the wisdom and patriotism, of the founders of his country, as being "the wise master builders of the noblest republic in the world," asks what is its present state after seventy years' brief experience? Behold the reply:—"First, then, we hear on every side the charge of political corruption. Bribery is practised in all our elections. The spoils of office are expected as a matter of course by the victorious party. The President of the United States dares not be impartial; for, if he were, he would lose the confidence of his friends without gaining the confidence of his enemies. The oldest statesmen, and the most prominent, cannot follow the dictates of their own judgment and conscience without being reproached as though they were laying a trap for the presidential chair. The very laws of Congress are set down as the results of personal venality or ambition. The House of Representatives, or even the Senate Chamber, are disgraced every year by fierce passion and violent denunciation. The barbarous and unchristian duel is anticipated as quite inevitable unless it be averted by explanations which may satisfy worldly honour, in utter contempt of all religious principle. And no member of either House can go to the performance of his public duties with any security that he may not be insulted by coarse invective before the day is closed. Yet our rulers are never weary of lauding the character of Washington, as if they were quite convinced that the time had passed by when they might be expected to verify the language of praise by the act of imitation. When we look into the other classes of the community, the same charge of venality and corruption meets us again. Our merchants are accused of all sorts of dishonest management; our brokers, of stock-jobbing; our city aldermen, of bribery; our lawyers, of knavery; our justices, of complicity with the guilty. The same worship of Mammon seems to govern the whole, and the current phrase, 'the almighty dollar,' is a sad but powerful exponent of the universal sin which involves the mass of our population."

Bishop Hopkins, in a speech given before the House of Convocation of Trinity College, Hartford, after praising the wisdom and patriotism of the founders of his country, calling them "the wise master builders of the noblest republic in the world," asks about the current state of things after seventy years of experience. Here’s the answer: "First of all, we hear everywhere the accusation of political corruption. Bribery is common in all our elections. The winning party expects to claim the spoils of office as a matter of course. The President of the United States cannot afford to be impartial; if he were, he would lose the trust of his allies without gaining any from his opponents. The oldest and most prominent statesmen can’t follow their own judgment and conscience without being accused of trying to position themselves for the presidential role. The very laws of Congress are regarded as products of personal greed or ambition. The House of Representatives, and even the Senate, are shamed every year by fierce arguments and harsh accusations. The brutal and un-Christian duel is expected to be inevitable unless it can be avoided through explanations that satisfy secular honor, disregarding all religious principles. No member of either House can perform his public duties with any assurance that he won't be insulted by harsh insults before the day is over. Yet our leaders never tire of praising Washington's character, as if they truly believe that the time has passed for them to prove their words by their actions. When we examine other segments of society, we encounter the same accusations of greed and dishonesty. Our merchants are accused of all kinds of dishonest practices; our brokers of stock manipulation; our city council members of bribery; our lawyers of deceit; our judges of collusion with the guilty. The same worship of money seems to control everyone, and the phrase 'the almighty dollar' sadly yet powerfully illustrates the widespread sin that affects so much of our population."

Being perfectly aware what a "glass house" of corruption we ourselves are living in, I do not quote the foregoing by way of "throwing a stone," but insert it merely as a warning of the direction in which we should not seek for an advance in purification.

Being fully aware of the "glass house" of corruption we live in, I don’t mention the above as a way of "throwing rocks," but rather as a warning about the direction we should avoid when looking for progress in purification.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

Why is it that, in our yearly debate in Parliament, and in all the journals of the day, from the Times down even to the Morning Advertiser, the United States are always quoted as a republic where the ballot succeeds, when there is no excuse for the most commonly educated man being ignorant of the fact, that the ballot, as understood in this country, does not exist among them? To their honour be it said, they hold secret voting in sovereign contempt.


The Ballot, by the Rev. SYDNEY SMITH. 1839.


This expression, both in America and England, is tantamount to—for life.


Vide ante, opinion of New York Press upon the trial of Matthew F. Ward.



    G. Washington       1789  
    J. Adams            1797  
    T. Jefferson        1801  
    J. Madison          1809  
    J. Monroe           1817  
    J.Q. Adams          1825  
    A. Jackson          1829  
    M. Van Buren        1837  
    W.H. Harrison       1841  
    J. Tyler            1841  
    J.K. Polk           1845  
    Z. Taylor           1849  
    M. Fillmore         1850  
    F. Pierce           1853  

CHAPTER XXVIII.

The Church, the School, and the Law.




Although the Church has no connexion with the State, it must ever be a most important element in any Christian community. I therefore furnish a table of the various denominations, so as to enable the reader, at a glance, to get the particular information he may desire. Some of the denominations given in this table are, of course, again divided into other sects, such as "Reformed Methodists," "Episcopal Methodists," "Wesleyan Methodists," "Six Principle Baptists," "Seventh-Day Baptists," "Anti-mission Baptists," &c.

Although the Church is separate from the State, it will always be a crucial part of any Christian community. I’ve included a table of the different denominations so that the reader can easily find the specific information they may be looking for. Some of the denominations listed in this table are further divided into other groups, such as "Reformed Methodists," "Episcopal Methodists," "Wesleyan Methodists," "Six Principle Baptists," "Seventh-Day Baptists," "Anti-mission Baptists," etc.

    Denominations.     Number of          Aggregate            Total Value
                       Churches.        Accommodation.             of
                                                             Church Property.
                                                                   £
    Baptists             8,791            3,130,878               2,295,590
    Christian             812              296,050                 177,621
    Congregational       1,674              795,177               1,674,532
    Dutch Reformed        324              181,986                 860,313
    Episcopal            1,422              625,213               2,365,013
    Free                  361              108,605                  52,973
    Friends               714              282,823                 359,071
    German Reformed       327              156,932                  29,024
    Jewish                 31               16,575                  78,036
    Lutheran             1,203              531,100                 602,205
    Mennonite             110               29,900                  19,791
    Methodist           12,467            4,209,333               3,073,700
    Moravian              331              112,185                  93,002
    Presbyterian         4,584            2,040,316               3,017,675
    Roman Catholic       1,112              620,950               1,884,505
    Swedenborgian          15                5,070                  22,701
    Tunker                 52               35,075                   9,665
    Union                 619              213,552                 144,913
    Unitarian             243              137,367                 686,305
    Universalist          494              205,462                 371,073
    Minor Sects           325              115,347                 155,815

    Total              36,011           13,849,896             £17,973,523

If the foregoing table may be taken as indicative of the whole population, it will be seen that one person out of every three is a Methodist, and only one in every twenty-two is a Romanist; but what is more worthy of remark is, the provision which, under the voluntary system, has been made for public worship.

If the table above represents the entire population, it's clear that one out of every three people is a Methodist, while only one out of every twenty-two is a Roman Catholic. However, what’s even more noteworthy is the arrangement that has been made for public worship under the voluntary system.

We here see accommodation provided for 14,000,000 in a population of 23,000,000—of which 3,000,000 are slaves. At the same time, it must also be observed, that all these churches are not necessarily supplied with ministers. Their support being dependent upon their congregation, it will occasionally happen that a minister gets starved out, and some time may elapse before a successor is appointed; the inconvenience of which contingency occurring is obvious. More than one such case came under my own observation when travelling through the country.

We can see that there’s accommodation for 14,000,000 people in a population of 23,000,000—of which 3,000,000 are enslaved. It should also be noted that not all these churches necessarily have ministers. Their funding relies on their congregation, so sometimes a minister might be overwhelmed and it may take a while before a replacement is found; the drawbacks of this situation are clear. I personally observed more than one such case while traveling through the country.

With regard to the distribution of the churches, the only peculiarity I observe is, that the Unitarian community appear to be nearly all gathered into one spot, and that spot the Land of the Pilgrim Fathers, and the State that is considered foremost in education. Out of 243 churches, 163 are situated in Massachusetts. I have never heard any reason given for this curious fact; doubtless the great talents of Channing tended to swell their numbers, but could hardly account for the extraordinary proportion established in this State.

With respect to how the churches are spread out, the only oddity I notice is that the Unitarian community seems to be almost entirely concentrated in one area, specifically the Land of the Pilgrim Fathers, which is also the state known for its strong emphasis on education. Out of 243 churches, 163 are located in Massachusetts. I've never heard any explanation for this interesting fact; surely Channing's great talents helped increase their numbers, but that alone can't explain the unusual proportion found in this state.

In proportion to its numbers, it will be seen that the Episcopal is the wealthiest of all Churches; and yet we find complaint made of the insufficiency of the support for their ministers. Bishop Eastburn, of Massachusetts, in a pastoral letter, states that in his diocese "respectable parents will not bring up their children to the clerical profession, because the salaries hardly keep people from starving." How far this is true generally, or whether confined to his own neighbourhood, I cannot say. The Episcopal Church in America is free from the violent factions that have distracted and thrown obloquy upon the sister church in this country. The puerile struggle about surplices, and candles, and steps up to altars, and Brussels lace offerings, appear to have attracted little attention among those in America, whose theological views assimilate with the extreme high party in England: and I never heard, during my residence in the States, any of that violent and uncharitable language with which discussions on religious topics too frequently abound in this country; nor is the Episcopal community by any means so divided as it is here. The Bishop of New Zealand is far nearer their type than the controversial prelate of Exeter.

In relation to its numbers, it's clear that the Episcopal Church is the wealthiest of all churches; however, there are complaints about the lack of support for their ministers. Bishop Eastburn of Massachusetts mentions in a pastoral letter that in his diocese, "respectable parents won't raise their children to be clergy because the salaries barely keep people from starving." How true this is on a larger scale, or if it's just in his area, I can't say. The Episcopal Church in America is free from the intense conflicts that have troubled the sister church in this country. The silly arguments about surplices, candles, steps leading to altars, and Brussels lace offerings seem to have gained little traction among those in America whose theological views align with the extreme high church in England. During my time in the States, I never heard any of the harsh and unkind language that often fills discussions on religious topics in this country, nor is the Episcopal community nearly as divided as it is here. The Bishop of New Zealand resembles their type far more than the controversial bishop of Exeter.

The Book of Common Prayer, as arranged by Convention in 1790, is well worthy of notice, and, in many points, of imitation. These pages are not the proper place for a theological discussion, and my only reason for touching upon the subject at all is, that the public voice is constantly calling for some modification of the great length of our present Sunday services, and I therefore conclude that the following observations may be interesting to some of my readers.

The Book of Common Prayer, organized by the Convention in 1790, is definitely worth mentioning and, in many ways, worth following. This isn't the right place for a theological debate, but I bring it up because there's a persistent public demand for some changes to the long duration of our current Sunday services. So, I believe the following comments might interest some of my readers.

The leading points of retrenchment are—removing all repetitions, such as the Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and the Collect for the day; a portion of the close of the Litany is omitted at the discretion of the minister. The Communion Service is not read every Sunday. I suppose the Church authorizes this omission at the discretion of the minister, as I have attended service on more than one occasion when the Communion was not read; when read, Our Lord's commandment, Matthew xxii. 37-40, follows the Commandments of the Old Testament, and a short Collect, followed by the Collect, Epistle, and Gospel for the day, finish that portion of the service. Independent of the regular Psalms, for the day, there are ten separate short collections, any one of which the minister may substitute for the proper Psalms, and the Gloria Patri is only said after the last Psalm.

The main points of cutbacks are—removing all repetitions, like the Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and the Collect for the day; a part of the end of the Litany can be skipped at the minister's discretion. The Communion Service isn't held every Sunday. I assume the Church allows this omission based on the minister's choice, as I've been to services more than once when Communion wasn’t performed; when it is, Our Lord's commandment, Matthew xxii. 37-40, follows the Commandments of the Old Testament, and a short Collect, followed by the Collect, Epistle, and Gospel for the day, wraps up that part of the service. Besides the regular Psalms for the day, there are ten separate short collections, any of which the minister can use instead of the proper Psalms, and the Gloria Patri is only said after the last Psalm.

The leading features of difference from our own "Common Prayer" are as follow:—They appoint proper Second Lessons for the Sunday, instead of leaving them, to the chance of the Calendar—they place the Nicene and Apostles' Creed side by side, and leave the minister to select which he prefers, and to use, if he think proper, the word "Hades" instead of Hell. They remove the Athanasian Creed entirely from the Prayer Book, leaving to the minister to explain the mysteries which that creed so summarily disposes of. When it is considered how many Episcopalians are opposed to its damnatory clauses, and how much more nearly the other creeds resemble that model of simplicity, the Lord's Prayer, they appear to have exercised a sound discretion in this excision. Few deep-thinking people, I imagine, can have heard the children of the parish school reading the responses of that creed after the minister, without pain.

The main differences from our "Common Prayer" are as follows: They provide appropriate Second Lessons for Sundays instead of leaving them to the randomness of the Calendar. They put the Nicene and Apostles' Creed together and allow the minister to choose which one to use, and if he thinks it's appropriate, to use the word "Hades" instead of Hell. They entirely remove the Athanasian Creed from the Prayer Book, leaving it to the minister to explain the mysteries that creed briefly addresses. Considering how many Episcopalians oppose its damnatory clauses, and how much closer the other creeds are to the simplicity of the Lord's Prayer, it seems they've made a sensible choice in this removal. I imagine few deep-thinking individuals can listen to the children in the parish school reciting the responses of that creed after the minister without feeling discomfort.

Lest the passing opinion of a traveller upon the subject be deemed hasty or irreverent, I beg to quote Bishop Tomline's opinion. He says—"Great objections have been made to the clauses which denounce eternal damnation against those who do not believe the faith as here stated; and it certainly is to be lamented that assertions of so peremptory a nature, unexplained and unqualified, should have been used in any human composition.... Though I firmly believe that the doctrines of this creed are all founded on Scripture, I cannot but conceive it to be both unnecessary and presumptuous to say that, "except every one do keep them whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly." Mr. Wheatley also, when writing on the Creed, says, that the third and fourth verses constitute the creed, and that what follows "requires our assent no more than a sermon does, which is made to prove or illustrate a text."—To resume.

To avoid the impression that a traveler's opinion on the matter is rushed or disrespectful, I'd like to reference Bishop Tomline's view. He states, "Many objections have been raised against the clauses that condemn eternal damnation for those who do not believe the faith as outlined here; it is certainly unfortunate that such absolute assertions, without explanation or qualification, have been included in any human writing.... While I firmly believe that the principles of this creed are all based on Scripture, I cannot help but think it is both unnecessary and arrogant to claim that 'unless everyone keeps them whole and unblemished, without a doubt they will perish forever.' Mr. Wheatley, when discussing the Creed, also mentions that the third and fourth verses make up the creed, and that what follows 'requires our assent no more than a sermon does, which is intended to prove or illustrate a text.'—To continue.

They have proper prayers and thanksgivings for individuals who desire their use, instead of, as with us, introducing a few words into the ordinary service. They have provided a liberal collection of psalms and hymns for singing in church, and no others are allowed to be used. Each psalm and hymn has the Gloria Patri suited to it marked at the beginning. The inconvenience of the total want of such a provision in our Church is most palpable. Not long before I went to America, I was attending a parish church in the country, where a great proportion of the psalms and hymns used were the minister's own composition, and if I recollect right, the book cost half-a-crown. I came up to town, and I found my parish church there had a selection under the sanction of the Bishop of London. Since my return from America, I have gone to the same London church, under the same Bishop, and I have found a totally different book in use.—The foregoing are the principal alterations in the Sunday services.

They have specific prayers and thanksgivings for people who want them, instead of just adding a few words to the regular service like we do. They’ve created a generous collection of psalms and hymns for singing in church, and only those are allowed to be used. Each psalm and hymn has the corresponding Gloria Patri marked at the beginning. The lack of such a provision in our Church is very obvious. Not long before I went to America, I was at a parish church in the countryside where a large number of the psalms and hymns were written by the minister himself, and if I remember correctly, the book cost half-a-crown. When I came to London, I found that my parish church there had a selection approved by the Bishop of London. Since returning from America, I’ve been to that same London church, under the same Bishop, and I discovered a completely different book in use. —The above are the main changes in the Sunday services.

The alterations in the other services are chiefly the following:—In the full Communion Service, the word "condemnation" is substituted for "damnation," in the notice of intimation. The whole of the damnatory clause in the exhortation, from the word "unworthily" to "sundry kinds of death," is expunged. The first prayer in our Church after the reception, is modified by them into an oblation and invocation, and precedes the reception. The remainder of the service is nearly the same as our own.

The changes in the other services are mainly the following:—In the full Communion Service, the word "condemnation" is used instead of "damnation" in the announcement. The entire damnatory clause in the exhortation, from the word "unworthily" to "sundry kinds of death," is removed. The first prayer in our Church after the reception is altered by them into an offering and invocation, and comes before the reception. The rest of the service is mostly the same as ours.

They have removed the objectionable opening of the Marriage Service; but, not content with that, they have also removed the whole of the service which follows the minister's blessing after the marriage is pronounced, and thus reduced it to a five minutes' ceremony. While on this subject, I may as well observe that, from inquiries I made, I believe but few of those marriages take place by which husband and wife are prevented from kneeling at the same altar, by which their highest interests can never be a subject of mutual discussion, and by which children are either brought up without any fixed religious ideas at all, or else a compromise is entered into, and the girls are educated in one church and the boys in another. In short, I believe the Romanists in America marry but rarely out of the pale of their own church. I cannot say what the law of divorce is, but it appears to offer far greater facilities than would be approved of in England. A gentleman mentioned two cases to me, in one of which the divorce was obtained by the wife without the husband being aware of it, although living in the same State; in the other, the wife returned to the State from which her husband had taken her, and there obtained a divorce without his knowledge.—To return from this digression. In the Visitation of the Sick they have removed that individual absolution of the minister, the wording of which is so objectionable that, if I am rightly informed, it is rarely used by ministers in England. In the Burial of the Dead, they have changed the two concluding prayers in those sentences which refer to the deceased. The Commination they have entirely expunged. They have added a full service for Visitation of Prisoners, and a Harvest Thanksgiving; and they have provided a form of morning and evening prayer for families.

They have removed the objectionable opening of the Marriage Service; however, they weren't satisfied with that and also eliminated the entire section that follows the minister's blessing after the marriage is pronounced, reducing it to a five-minute ceremony. While we're on this topic, I should mention that, from my inquiries, I believe very few of those marriages happen where the husband and wife are prevented from kneeling at the same altar, which means their most important interests can never be discussed together, and children are either raised without any solid religious beliefs or a compromise is made where girls are educated in one church and boys in another. In short, I believe Catholics in America rarely marry outside their own church. I can't speak to the divorce laws, but it seems to offer much easier options than would be accepted in England. A man mentioned two cases to me; in one, the wife got a divorce without her husband knowing about it, even while living in the same state; in the other, the wife returned to the state her husband had taken her from and got a divorce without his knowledge. — Now, back to the main point. In the Visitation of the Sick, they've removed that individual absolution from the minister, the wording of which is so problematic that, if I'm informed correctly, it's rarely used by ministers in England. In the Burial of the Dead, they've changed the last two prayers in those passages that refer to the deceased. The Commination has been completely removed. They've added a full service for the Visitation of Prisoners, along with a Harvest Thanksgiving; and they've included a format for morning and evening prayers for families.

The foregoing constitute the leading points of difference. Of course there are many minor ones which are merely verbal, such, for instance, as their expunging the scriptural quotation of "King of kings, Lord of lords," from the prayer for the President, probably out of deference to the prejudices of the Republicans, for which omission they have partially atoned by the substitution of the grander expression of "only Ruler of the Universe," in lieu of the more limited term "only Ruler of Princes." To enter into all these verbal changes would be alike tedious and useless. Enough, I trust, has been written to convey a general idea of the most striking and interesting points of difference.

The points of difference mentioned above are the main ones. There are certainly many minor differences that are just about wording, like the removal of the scriptural line "King of kings, Lord of lords," from the prayer for the President, probably to avoid upsetting the Republicans. They somewhat made up for this by using the more impressive phrase "only Ruler of the Universe" instead of the narrower "only Ruler of Princes." Going into all these wording changes would be both tedious and pointless. I hope what has been written provides a clear idea of the most notable and interesting differences.

Other churches transplanted to this hemisphere seem to differ from the parent stock most essentially. Thus I find in the almanack for 1853, "Methodist Episcopal Church (North) 3984 ministers, and 662,315 communicants," and below them "Methodist Episcopal Church (South)" without any return of statistics. I regret not being able to give the reader any history of this occidental hierarchy. I do not even know the Episcopacizing process they go through, whether it is entirely lay or entirely clerical, or whether it is a fusion of the two. At first I imagined it was a Wesleyan offshoot, but I can find no indication of that fact; and, moreover, the Wesleyan is a very small body, numbering 600 ministers and 20,000 communicants. I only allude to it because it appears to me a totally novel feature in Dissenting bodies—as understood in England. Another curious change produced by this Western climate is, that it turns all my Presbyterian friends instrumentally musical. I do not remember entering any of their churches without finding an organ, and in many instances a very good choir. Although I approve highly of the euphonious improvement, I feel sure that many of my countrymen in the extreme north would rather see a picture representing Satan in Abraham's bosom inside their kirk than any musical instrument. Such is the force of habit and prejudice.

Other churches moved to this side of the Atlantic seem to differ quite a bit from their origins. For example, in the 1853 almanac, I found "Methodist Episcopal Church (North) with 3,984 ministers and 662,315 members," while below it, there's "Methodist Episcopal Church (South)" with no statistics given. I wish I could provide the reader with some background on this western church hierarchy, but I don't even know the process they use to ordain ministers—whether it’s completely lay, completely clerical, or some mix of both. Initially, I thought it was a branch of Wesleyanism, but I can't find any evidence of that; plus, the Wesleyan Church is quite small, with just 600 ministers and 20,000 members. I mention it only because it seems like a completely new aspect in Dissenting churches as understood in England. Another interesting change brought by this western environment is that all my Presbyterian friends have become musically inclined. I can’t recall visiting any of their churches without finding an organ, and in many cases, a very good choir as well. While I greatly appreciate this melodious improvement, I’m certain that many of my fellow countrymen in the far north would rather see an image of Satan in Abraham's bosom displayed in their church than any musical instrument. Such is the power of habit and bias.

The extent to which the churches in America have increased is doubtless most creditable to the community, when it is remembered that all the various denominations are supported voluntarily. Nor is their number the only point worthy of notice: the buildings themselves have all, some ecclesiastical appearance, and many of them are fine specimens of architecture. Besides which, they are always kept clean and in good order; you will never find those unsightly barns, and still less the dilapidation which is often met with in the mother land. I have myself been in a church at home where the flooring was all worn away, and gravel from the outside substituted, and where the seats were so rickety that a fall might be anticipated at any moment. The parishioners were poor Highlanders, it is true, but the owner of the soil was a man of considerable wealth.

The growth of churches in America is certainly commendable for the community, especially considering that all the different denominations rely on voluntary support. Their numbers alone aren't the only notable aspect; the buildings all have some ecclesiastical character, and many are impressive examples of architecture. Furthermore, they are always kept clean and well-maintained; you won't find those unsightly barns, and even less the neglect that is often seen in the homeland. I’ve been to a church back home where the flooring was completely worn out, replaced with gravel from outside, and where the benches were so shaky that a fall seemed inevitable. It's true the parishioners were poor Highlanders, but the landowner was quite wealthy.

I have, since my return to England, been into a beautiful old parish church in one of the midland counties; the building was in a most deplorable state of dilapidation, and the communion-rail formed a music-stand, while inside were placed an orchestra of two fiddles and a bass-viol. The minister received, for the first three years he officiated, the exorbitant remuneration of thirty pounds a year; since which time he has taken the duties of parish schoolmaster, the salary of which, increased by a small sum from Queen Anne's Bounty, enables him to keep body and soul together. But of course the school engrossed all his time, except what was necessary to prepare his discourses, and his parishioners were unavoidably and totally neglected, till dissenting ministers came to the rescue. As a natural consequence, they soon followed the ministers who made them the objects of their care, and when I attended this beautiful old parish church, the congregation, independent of the orchestra and the parish school, consisted of eleven souls, three of whom came from the minister's own house. You might seek in vain to parallel such a case throughout the whole Republic.

Since returning to England, I've visited a beautiful old parish church in one of the midland counties; the building was in a terrible state of disrepair, and the communion rail served as a music stand while there was an orchestra of two violins and a bass. The minister received an outrageous salary of thirty pounds a year for the first three years he served; since then, he has taken on the role of parish schoolmaster, and with a small amount from Queen Anne's Bounty, he manages to get by. However, the school consumed all his time, except for what he needed to prepare his sermons, leaving his parishioners completely neglected until dissenting ministers stepped in. Naturally, they soon followed the ministers who took care of them, and when I attended this beautiful old parish church, the congregation, apart from the orchestra and the parish school, consisted of eleven people, three of whom were from the minister's own home. You would search in vain for a similar case anywhere else in the Republic.

I now propose to make a few observations about disbelief in the United States. On this point I have no statistics to refer to, nor do I believe such exist. I therefore can form no idea of its extent; but the open way in which some parties not only express their doubts of the authenticity of Scripture, but dispute every doctrine which it contains, and openly proclaim it the enemy of man, is worthy of some notice. An Ismite Convention was held for many days at Hartford, in one of the New England States (Connecticut) where, I suppose, education may be considered as universal as in any other State in the Union.

I’d like to share a few thoughts on disbelief in the United States. I don’t have any statistics to reference, and I doubt there are any available. So, I can’t really gauge how widespread it is; however, the way some groups openly question the authenticity of Scripture, challenge every doctrine it presents, and boldly label it as the enemy of humanity is noteworthy. An Ismite Convention took place for several days in Hartford, one of the New England States (Connecticut), where I assume education is as widespread as in any other state in the country.

The meeting was considered of sufficient importance to occupy daily several columns of one of the New York leading journals, and to employ a special reporter. It is thus headed—"MEETING OF PHILOSOPHERS, THEOLOGIANS, THINKERS, STRONG-MINDED WOMEN, SPIRITUAL RAPPERS, ATHEISTS, AND NEGROES." Details of this Convention would be too tedious; I propose only giving a few of their resolutions. Resolved—"That the Bible, in some parts of the Old and New Testament, sanctions injustice, concubinage, prostitution, oppression, war, plunder, and wholesale murder, and, therefore, that the Bible as a whole, originated,[CG] is false, and injurious to the social and spiritual growth of man." After which the chairman goes on to prove (?) it is purely human, &c. Another resolution reiterates the former, and adds that "the time has come to declare its untruthfulness, and to unmask those who are guilty of its imposture." Then follows a resolution for the especial consideration of slave-owners:—"Resolved—That it is the climax of audacity and impiety for this nation to receive the Bible as the inspired Word of God, and then to make it a penal offence to give it to any of the millions who are held as chattel slaves on its soil, thus conspiring to make them miserable here and hereafter." Then follows a charitable resolution, declaring their belief that all the clergy "would readily burn the Bible to-morrow if public sentiment demanded it." One of the orators brings the Bible to the bar of geology, and there condemns it, and recommends "that the Hindoos should establish a mission to enlighten Christians of this and other countries. He believed that the priesthood and the Bible were opposed to all liberty and progress, and the deadliest enemies of mankind."

The meeting was seen as important enough to fill several columns daily in one of New York's leading newspapers and to require a special reporter. It was titled—"MEETING OF PHILOSOPHERS, THEOLOGIANS, THINKERS, STRONG-MINDED WOMEN, SPIRITUAL RAPPERS, ATHEISTS, AND NEGROES." Detailing this Convention would be too lengthy; instead, I’ll share a few of their resolutions. Resolved—"That the Bible, in certain parts of the Old and New Testament, supports injustice, concubinage, prostitution, oppression, war, plunder, and mass murder; therefore, the Bible as a whole is false and damaging to the social and spiritual development of humanity." After this, the chairman attempts to argue it’s purely human, etc. Another resolution echoes the previous one, adding that "the time has come to declare its falsehood and expose those responsible for its deception." Then there’s a resolution specifically addressing slave owners:—"Resolved—That it is the height of audacity and impiety for this nation to accept the Bible as the inspired Word of God while making it a crime to share it with any of the millions held as chattel slaves on its soil, thus working to make them miserable both here and in the afterlife." Following this is a charitable resolution, expressing the belief that all clergy "would gladly burn the Bible tomorrow if public opinion demanded it." One of the speakers brings the Bible to the standards of geology, condemns it, and suggests "that the Hindus should establish a mission to enlighten Christians in this and other countries. He believed the priesthood and the Bible were against all freedom and progress, and were the deadliest enemies of humanity."

Another member of this blasphemous band becomes highly indignant because the orthodox clergymen—who probably remembered that "evil communications corrupt good manners"—would not meet them on their infidel platform, and he presents a resolution declaring that "by their absence, they had openly declared their infidelity to their professions of theological faith, and had thus confessed the weakness and folly of their arrogant assumptions, and proved that they loved popular favour more than common good; and they are therefore moral cowards, pharisees of this nineteenth century, seeking to enslave more and more the mind of man," &c. Another orator then proposes a resolution, to the effect that the spirit and genius of Bible religion is not a system of salvation from sin and its effects, but a system of damnation into sin and its effects; that it is the friend of moral and spiritual slavery, and therefore "the foe of human mental and spiritual liberty." Subsequently a strong-minded woman, called Mrs. Rose, appeared on the platform amid considerable uproar, followed by extinguishing the gas and singing songs. After a severe struggle, the lady managed to express her sentiments in these mild and Christian terms:—"The Church is upon your neck. Do you want to be free? Then trample the Church, the priest, and the Bible under your feet."—The last day's proceeding closed by a row in the gallery, owing to a fight, in which a dirk had been drawn; and then the Convention adjourned till the following year.

Another member of this outrageous group became really angry because the traditional clergymen—who probably remembered that "bad company corrupts good character"—wouldn't engage with them on their unorthodox platform. He introduced a resolution stating that "by their absence, they openly declared their unfaithfulness to their supposed theological beliefs, revealing the weakness and foolishness of their arrogant claims, and proving that they valued public approval over the greater good; therefore, they are moral cowards, the pharisees of this nineteenth century, trying to further enslave the human mind," etc. Another speaker then suggested a resolution claiming that the essence and spirit of Biblical religion is not a means of salvation from sin and its consequences, but rather a system that damns people into sin and its repercussions; that it supports moral and spiritual enslavement, and is thus "the enemy of human mental and spiritual freedom." Following this, a strong-minded woman named Mrs. Rose took to the stage amidst significant chaos, which included turning off the gas and singing songs. After a tough battle, she managed to share her thoughts in these moderate and Christian words: "The Church is on your back. Do you want to be free? Then trample the Church, the priest, and the Bible underfoot." The event concluded with a commotion in the balcony due to a fight, in which a knife was drawn; then the Convention was adjourned until the next year.

The reader must not imagine that I state this as an indication of the tone of religious feeling in the New England States,—far from it; but it appears to me a fact worth noticing, that a Convention of such a nature and magnitude, and considered of sufficient importance to employ the special reporter of a leading journal of New York, should by any possibility assemble for days and days together, and give vent to such blasphemous sentiments among a people so liberally educated and so amply supplied with means of religious instruction. I only hope that the infidelity of the whole Republic was gathered into that one assembly, and that having met in so uncongenial an atmosphere, they all returned to their homes impregnated with some of the purer atmosphere of the great majority of the people.

The reader shouldn't think I'm suggesting this reflects the overall religious sentiment in New England—quite the opposite; however, I find it noteworthy that a Convention of this size and importance, deemed significant enough to merit the attention of a special reporter from a leading New York newspaper, could gather for days on end and express such disrespectful views among a population that is so well-educated and has access to ample religious instruction. I merely hope that the skepticism of the entire nation was concentrated in that one gathering, and that after meeting in such a challenging environment, they all went back home influenced by the more positive atmosphere of the vast majority of people.

The subject of Education naturally follows the Church; but, on this point, any attempt at accuracy is hopeless. Whether it be from the variety of school systems in the different States, or from some innate defect in the measures taken to obtain information, I cannot pretend to say; but the discrepancies between the statements made are so great, that I can only pretend to give a moderate approximation to the truth, which is the more to be regretted, as the means provided for education throughout the length and breadth of the Republic constitute one of its noblest features. In rough numbers, they may be thus stated:—

The topic of Education naturally follows the Church; however, any effort to be accurate here seems pointless. Whether it's due to the different school systems across the various States or some inherent flaw in how information is gathered, I can't say for sure. But the differences in the information provided are so significant that I can only attempt to give a rough estimate of the truth, which is unfortunate since the resources available for education throughout the entire country are one of its greatest strengths. In general terms, they can be summarized as follows:—

    Schools.               Number.    Instructors.       Students.

    Public                 81,000       92,000          4,000,000
    Colleges                  220         1500             20,000
    Academies, & others     6,000       12,000            261,000

Of the above colleges, theology claims 44, medicine 37, law 16.

Of the colleges listed above, theology has 44, medicine has 37, and law has 16.

Among the expenses of the various colleges, which I can refer to, I find University College, Virginia—the terms of which occupy 44 weeks—is the most expensive. The annual charges for a student are the following:—College expenses, 40l.; board, 22l.; washing, fuel, and lights, 4l.—in all, 70l. It is obvious that no provision is here made for champagne suppers, hunters, tandems, and other "necessaries," of our University students, including a few "auxiliaries," in the shape of I O U's, for red coats, top-boots, Hudson's regalias, and mysterious jewellery bills for articles that men don't wear. Doubtless some papas would prefer the Virginian bill of fare; but then, they must remember that the republican lads go to college to learn something, whereas many papas send their first-born hopes to Oxford and Cambridge to save themselves trouble, and to keep the youths out of mischief during the awkward period of life yclept "hobbledehoyhood." How they succeed is pretty well known to themselves, and probably their bankers have some idea also; yet, with all these drawbacks, who will deny that those seats of learning turn out annually some of the most manly and high-minded, and some of the best educated and most industrious, young men in the country?

Among the expenses of the various colleges I can refer to, I find that University College, Virginia—whose terms last for 44 weeks—is the most expensive. The annual costs for a student are as follows: college fees, £40; board, £22; washing, fuel, and lights, £4—totaling £70. It's clear that there’s no allowance for champagne dinners, hunting, tandem bikes, and other "essentials” often associated with university students, including a few “extras” like IOUs for red coats, riding boots, fancy uniforms, and mysterious jewelry bills for items that men don’t usually wear. Some parents might prefer the Virginia cost structure; however, they should keep in mind that the students there are attending college to actually learn something, while many parents send their eldest to Oxford and Cambridge just to avoid hassle and keep them out of trouble during that awkward stage of life known as "teenage years." How well that approach works is fairly well understood by themselves, and likely their bankers have some insight too; still, despite these downsides, who can deny that these institutions produce some of the most honorable, high-minded, and best-educated young men in the country each year?

Having entered into some of the details of education at various places during my travels, I shall not trespass on the reader's patience by dwelling further on the subject, except to call attention to the following important regulation with regard to children in factories; and I most sincerely hope it may reach the eye of Lord Shaftesbury, or some other of his coadjutors in the noble work of the protection and education of helpless youth. The regulation exists in some shape or other in many States. I subjoin the wording of it from that of Massachusetts:—

Having discussed some details about education in different places during my travels, I won't take up any more of the reader's time on this topic, except to highlight the following important regulation regarding children in factories. I truly hope it comes to the attention of Lord Shaftesbury or others involved in the important work of protecting and educating vulnerable youth. This regulation exists in various forms in many States. Here is the wording from Massachusetts:—

"No child under the age of fifteen years shall be employed in any manufacturing establishment, unless such child shall have attended some public or private day-school, where instruction is given by a teacher qualified according to law to teach orthography, reading, writing, English grammar, geography, arithmetic, and good behaviour, at least one term of eleven weeks of the twelve months next preceding the time of such employment, and for the same period during any and every twelve months in which such child shall be so employed."

"No child under the age of fifteen years can be employed in any manufacturing facility unless they have attended a public or private day school where a qualified teacher provides instruction in spelling, reading, writing, English grammar, geography, arithmetic, and good behavior for at least one term of eleven weeks in the twelve months before the start of their employment, and for the same duration in every twelve-month period they are employed."

Although my salt-fish friends are probably very familiar with sea-lawyers, the general reader may be astonished to see any allusion to law made by a sea-captain. I therefore beg to inform him, that the following observations on a most interesting point are furnished me by a friend who is legitimately at home in that complicated business, and who devoted much attention to the study of the method by which land is conveyed in the United States with so much ease and so little expense:—

Although my salt-fish friends probably know all about sea-lawyers, the average reader might be surprised to see a sea captain mentioning anything about the law. So, I want to let you know that the following thoughts on a really interesting topic come from a friend who is well-versed in that complex field and has spent a lot of time studying how land is transferred in the United States so easily and cheaply:—

"In America all conveyances of land, whether absolute or by way of mortgage only, are, with the exception of some chattel interests, required to be registered within a fixed or a reasonable time after their execution. Registration is constructive notice to all the world; if not registered, a deed is only valid against the parties to it and the heirs and devisees of the grantor. Generally, however, notice obtained by a purchaser previous to his purchase, will, if clearly proved, prevent his taking the advantage, though he may have been beforehand in registering his own title.

"In America, all transfers of land, whether outright sales or just mortgages, must be registered within a specific or reasonable timeframe after they are executed, except for some personal property interests. Registration serves as notice to everyone; if a deed isn’t registered, it’s only valid against the parties involved and the heirs and beneficiaries of the seller. However, if a buyer obtains notice before making the purchase, and it can be clearly proven, that buyer won't be able to benefit from their earlier registration of their own title."

"By the old laws of Massachusetts, all deeds of conveyance were required to be recorded, 'that neither creditors might be defrauded, nor courts troubled with vexatious suits and endless contentions.' In consequence of the number of registers established in each county—and the excellence of their arrangements, no inconvenience results from the accumulation of deeds, notwithstanding the early period to which they go back. In register for Suffolk county, Massachusetts, are to be seen copies of deeds from 1640 down to the present time. They are bound up in 640 volumes, and do not as yet take up much space. They have lately multiplied in an increasing ratio, the volumes having risen from 250 to their present number in the last 25 years.

"According to the old laws of Massachusetts, all property transfer documents had to be recorded to prevent creditors from getting cheated and to avoid courts being bothered with frivolous lawsuits and endless disputes. Because of the many registries set up in each county and their effective organization, there is no issue with the large number of recorded deeds, even though they date back to early times. In the Suffolk County registry, Massachusetts, you can find copies of deeds from 1640 to the present. They are organized in 640 volumes, which still don’t take up much space. Recently, their numbers have grown rapidly, with the volumes increasing from 250 to the current total over the past 25 years."

"The register for Philadelphia county, Pennsylvania, contains within a moderate compass deeds from 1683 downwards. They are referred to by indices on the following plan: All deeds made within a certain time, and in which the name of the grantor commences with the same letter of the alphabet, are bound up in one volume; thus, a volume marked "H 1820-1847," contains all deeds executed between those years by grantors whose names begin with H. One index volume contains the names of all grantors between those years in alphabetical order, another that of all grantees, and both refer to volume and page of the books of deeds. A third index gives the names of grantors and grantees, arranged chronologically, according to the year in which the deed they were parties to was executed.

The register for Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, includes a collection of deeds dating back to 1683. They are organized using the following system: All deeds made within a specific timeframe, where the grantor's name starts with the same letter, are compiled into one volume. For example, a volume labeled "H 1820-1847" contains all deeds created between those years by grantors whose names start with H. One index volume lists the names of all grantors from that period in alphabetical order, while another list includes all grantees, with both pointing to the volume and page of the deed books. A third index arranges the names of grantors and grantees chronologically, based on the year their respective deeds were executed.

"The original deed remain in the possession of the proprietors, but are of secondary importance. They are written in a plain, legible hand on paper, parchment being seldom used. The signatures of the parties are of course requisite; but the seal, which is essential to a deed in England, is in many States dispensed with. The custom of registering obviates the necessity for those long recitals that so swell out an English conveyance, and the shortest possible forms of covenants are preferred. The American conveyance only witnesses that the grantor conveys the property therein described, which, or part of which, was conveyed to him by such a one by a deed of such a date, and a marginal note states the volume and page where the deed thus mentioned is to be seen.

"The original deed stays with the owners, but it’s of secondary importance. They’re written in a clear, legible hand on paper, since parchment is rarely used. The signatures of the parties are obviously necessary, but in many states, the seal, which is essential for a deed in England, isn’t required. The custom of registering eliminates the need for those long recitals that inflate an English conveyance, and the shortest possible forms of covenants are preferred. The American conveyance simply states that the grantor transfers the property described, part of which was previously given to them by someone else through a deed of a certain date, and a marginal note indicates the volume and page where the referenced deed can be found."

"The advantages of registration are,—greater security of title, and brevity and economy in conveyances. The example of the United States shows that there is nothing in the Anglo-Saxon laws of real property to render such a system impracticable. Several of the most eminent lawyers in Boston declared, that their registration was found to work easily and safely; the only change desired was by a few, who expressed a wish that more registers should be established, as, one for every district, instead of for every county. They all expressed their astonishment that a similar plan had not long ago been adopted in England. They admitted that dealings with property were more simple in America, where strict settlements are either not allowed, or not generally in use, but maintained that the real obstacles to a registration in this country lie not so much in the difficulty of carrying it out, as in the prejudices of landowners, the self-interest of lawyers, and the superstitious dread entertained by John Bull generally of anything to which he is unaccustomed."[CH]

"The benefits of registration are greater security of title and more efficiency and cost-effectiveness in property transfers. The example of the United States demonstrates that there's nothing in Anglo-Saxon property laws that makes such a system impossible. Several top lawyers in Boston stated that their registration process works smoothly and reliably; the only change a few wanted was for more registries to be created—one for each district instead of one for each county. They were all surprised that a similar system had not been implemented in England long ago. They acknowledged that property transactions are simpler in America, where strict settlements are either not permitted or not widely used, but argued that the real barriers to a registration system in this country stem not from the challenges of implementation but from landowners' biases, lawyers' self-interest, and the general fear that John Bull has of anything unfamiliar." [CH]

I am no lawyer, as I observed before, and therefore I do not pretend to pass an opinion on the details of the foregoing remarks; but of the results produced by their system, I certainly can speak, for I have seen property transferred without the slightest trouble, and for a few shillings, which, owing to the amount involved, and the complications connected with it, would, if transferred in this country, have kept the firm of Screw, Skinflint, and Stickem hard at work for mouths, and when finished, would have required a week to make up the bill of costs, &c.

I’m not a lawyer, as I mentioned before, so I won’t give my opinion on the specifics of what was said earlier; however, I can definitely talk about the results of their system. I've seen property change hands with absolutely no hassle, and for just a few shillings, which, given the amount and the related complexities, would have kept the firm of Screw, Skinflint, and Stickem busy for months here, and once they were done, it would have taken a week just to prepare the bill for costs, etc.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

I suppose originated from the Deity is intended.—H.A.M.


Communicated to me by Mr. J.G. Dodson, son of the Right Honourable Sir J. Dodson, Dean of the Arches, &c.



CHAPTER XXIX.

Inventions and Inveighings.—Palquam qui meruit ferat.




Writing about law makes one litigious; so I seize this opportunity for making a few observations on American claims. I am not going to open the question of the Bay of Fundy, &c., fisheries; because British liberality has resigned a right, the retention of which was a source of continual irritation to our republican neighbours. I must, however, quote a few lines from the work of their able Chancellor, Kent, to show how fully justified we were in claiming the sovereignty of the Bay of Fundy. If the Chancellor's work on the Law of Nations is consulted, it will be found that he points out to his countrymen their right to the sovereignty of lines stretching "from Cape Anne to Cape Cod, Nantucket to Montauck Point, thence to the Capes of the Delaware, and from the South Cape of Florida to the Mississippi." With such wholesale claims asserted on their part, it would require something more than modest assurance to dispute England's right to the Bay of Fundy. But my litigation with the Republic is respecting some of their claims to inventions, which they put forward in so barefaced a manner, that the unwary or the uninquiring—which two sections of the human family constitute the great majority—are constantly misled into a belief of their truth; and the citizens of the Republic would do well to remember, that by putting forward unwarrantable pretensions to some discoveries, they afford just grounds for questioning their lawful claims to others.

Writing about the law makes one prone to legal disputes; so I’m taking this chance to share some thoughts on American claims. I’m not going to dive into the issue of the Bay of Fundy fisheries, because British generosity has given up a right that continually annoyed our republican neighbors. However, I must quote a few lines from the work of their capable Chancellor, Kent, to illustrate how justified we were in claiming sovereignty over the Bay of Fundy. If you look at the Chancellor's work on the Law of Nations, you'll see he points out to his fellow countrymen their right to the sovereignty of lines extending "from Cape Anne to Cape Cod, Nantucket to Montauk Point, then to the Capes of the Delaware, and from the South Cape of Florida to the Mississippi." With such broad claims made on their part, it would take more than simple confidence to challenge England's right to the Bay of Fundy. But my dispute with the Republic involves some of their claims to inventions, which they present so shamelessly that those who are unsuspecting or not inquisitive—two groups that make up the vast majority of humanity—are often misled into believing they're true. The citizens of the Republic would do well to remember that by making unjustified claims about certain discoveries, they give valid reasons to question their legitimate claims to others.

The first I shall mention is with reference to Fulton and steam. Mr. Charles King, the President of Columbia College, in a lecture delivered before the Mechanics' Institute, Broadway, New York, in December, 1851, claims for Fulton "the application of a known force in a new manner, and to new and before unthought-of purposes." Now what are the real facts? James Watt, in 1769, patented the double-acting engine, which was the first step by which the steam-engine was made capable of being used to propel a vessel. In 1780, James Pickard patented what is no other than the present connecting rod and crank, and a fly-wheel, the second and last great improvement in the steam-engine, which enabled it to be of service in propelling vessels.[CI] In 1785, William Symington took out a patent, by which he obtained, with economy of fuel, a more perfect method of condensation of steam and a more perfect vacuum.

The first thing I'll discuss is Fulton and steam. Mr. Charles King, the President of Columbia College, gave a lecture at the Mechanics' Institute on Broadway in New York in December 1851, where he stated that Fulton "applied a known force in a new way, and for new and previously unimagined purposes." So, what are the actual facts? James Watt patented the double-acting engine in 1769, which was the first step in making the steam engine suitable for propelling boats. In 1780, James Pickard patented what we now know as the connecting rod and crank, along with a flywheel, which was the second and final major improvement in the steam engine that allowed it to be used for propelling vessels.[CI] In 1785, William Symington filed a patent that provided a more efficient method for condensing steam and achieving a better vacuum while saving fuel.

In 1787, Mr. Miller, of Dalswinton, a gentleman who had spent a fortune of nearly 30,000l. in ship-building experiments, was urged by Mr. Taylor to try and apply the power of steam to vessels. William Symington was applied to, with the view of knowing if he could apply his engine to one of Mr. Miller's boats, which he accordingly did, and propelled a little pleasure vessel on the lake at Dalswinton, at the rate of five miles an hour, on the 14th November, 1788. In the following year, Mr. Symington made a double engine for a boat to be tried upon the Forth and Clyde Canal; and in the month of December, 1789, this trial-vessel was propelled at the rate of six and a half miles an hour. Lord Dundas, who was a large proprietor in the Forth and Clyde Canal, employed Symington to make experiments in 1801. The result of these trials was the construction of the "Charlotte Dundas," the first practical steam-boat ever built. The engines of this vessel combined the patents before mentioned of Watt, Pickard, and Symington, which combinations—made by the latter patentee—constitute the present system of steam navigation. The "Charlotte Dundas" made her trial trip in March, 1802, and so satisfactory was the trial, that the Duke of Bridgewater ordered eight boats of Symington, for the purpose of running on his canal. The Duke of Bridgewater died immediately after; and the Forth and Clyde proprietors, owing to the injury caused to the banks, discontinued the use of the boat. The foregoing observations prove that if any one individual can claim the merit of inventing the steam-engine, that man is William Symington, who, combining previous inventions with his own patent, constructed the engine as at present in use. At the same time, every credit is due to Mr. Miller, who first afforded Symington the opportunity of putting his ingenuity to the test.

In 1787, Mr. Miller from Dalswinton, a man who had spent nearly £30,000 on ship-building experiments, was encouraged by Mr. Taylor to try using steam power for vessels. William Symington was approached to see if he could use his engine on one of Mr. Miller's boats, which he successfully did, propelling a small pleasure boat on the lake at Dalswinton at a speed of five miles per hour on November 14, 1788. The following year, Mr. Symington created a double engine for a boat that was tested on the Forth and Clyde Canal; by December 1789, this test boat was able to travel at a speed of six and a half miles per hour. Lord Dundas, a major owner of the Forth and Clyde Canal, hired Symington to conduct experiments in 1801. These trials led to the construction of the "Charlotte Dundas," the first practical steam boat ever built. The engines for this vessel combined the patents of Watt, Pickard, and Symington, which together form the basis of modern steam navigation. The "Charlotte Dundas" went on its trial trip in March 1802, and the results were so impressive that the Duke of Bridgewater ordered eight boats from Symington to operate on his canal. Unfortunately, the Duke of Bridgewater died shortly after, and the Forth and Clyde owners stopped using the boat due to damage caused to the banks. These observations demonstrate that if anyone can be credited with inventing the steam engine, it is William Symington, who merged previous inventions with his own patent to create the engine we use today. At the same time, all credit goes to Mr. Miller, who first gave Symington the chance to test his ideas.

HUDSON RIVER STEAMER.

HUDSON RIVER STEAMER.

HUDSON RIVER STEAMER.

HUDSON RIVER STEAMBOAT.

Let us now look at Mr. Fulton's part in the transaction. In 1801 he visited Scotland, and was present at one of the experiments making by Symington on the canal, and from him he obtained permission to make full sketches and notes of both boat and apparatus. The fact is sworn to on oath of the presence of an American gentleman, who called himself Mr. Fulton, during the experiments; and further evidence is found in the fact that the engines he ordered of Messrs. Boulton and Watt for the "Clermont" were precisely of the same dimensions as those in the "Charlotte Dundas," with the exception of two inches more diameter in the piston; and the patent of Fulton dates from 1809—twenty years after Symington had propelled a boat by steam on Lake Dalswinton, and eight years after he had himself taken sketches of Symington's engines in the Forth and Clyde canal-boat.

Let’s take a look at Mr. Fulton's role in the transaction. In 1801, he traveled to Scotland and witnessed one of Symington's experiments on the canal. He got permission from Symington to create detailed sketches and notes of both the boat and the equipment. It's confirmed under oath that an American gentleman identifying himself as Mr. Fulton was present during these experiments. Additional evidence shows that the engines he ordered from Messrs. Boulton and Watt for the "Clermont" were exactly the same size as those in the "Charlotte Dundas," except for a two-inch larger diameter in the piston. Fulton's patent dates back to 1809—twenty years after Symington had already propelled a boat using steam on Lake Dalswinton, and eight years after Fulton had taken his own sketches of Symington's engines in the Forth and Clyde canal boat.

Beyond the foregoing evidence, there is the testimony of Mr. Bell that, at Fulton's request, he sent him information, plans, &c., of Mr. Miller's first experiments. The long and the short of the story is clearly this:—Mr. Fulton was a shrewd and clever engineer. He came to England, copied the steam-engine which Symington had combined—one can hardly say invented—and then returned to his own country, and applied it successfully, for which the Republic ought to be thankful to him, and to honour his name; but, for a president of a college lecturing before a mechanics' society, to call Fulton the inventor "of applying a known force in a new manner and to new and before unthought-of purposes," exhibits an ignorance or an assurance, for neither of which the slightest excuse can be made.[CJ]

Beyond the evidence mentioned earlier, there’s Mr. Bell’s testimony that, at Fulton's request, he sent him information, plans, etc., about Mr. Miller's first experiments. In short, the situation is clear: Mr. Fulton was a savvy and talented engineer. He went to England, replicated the steam engine that Symington had put together—it's hard to call it an invention—and then returned to his own country, where he successfully applied it. The Republic should be grateful to him and honor his name; however, for a college president speaking at a mechanics' society to call Fulton the inventor "of applying a known force in a new manner and to new and before unthought-of purposes," shows either ignorance or arrogance, neither of which can be excused.[CJ]


With equal accuracy Mr. King informs the mechanics that "Colonel John Stevens had clearly worked out in his own mind, long before any locomotive was constructed in Europe, the theory of such an application of steam, and the actual form in which it could be advantageously made, as well as the cost of constructing and working a railway for the use of locomotives." If this were true, how does it happen that the son of the Colonel, an able and ingenious mechanician, came over to George Stephenson, at Liverpool, to learn what he was doing, and to order engines from him; but Mr. King out-herods Herod, for he claims on behalf of the Colonel, the working of Steam expansively in 1815, for which Watt had taken out a patent thirty-five years before. If presidents of colleges in America cannot in their lectures deal more closely with facts, the instruction given within the walls of the college will come under very unfavourable suspicions.

With equal precision, Mr. King informs the mechanics that "Colonel John Stevens had clearly figured out in his own mind, long before any locomotive was built in Europe, the theory of using steam in this way, the actual design that could be effectively implemented, as well as the costs of constructing and operating a railway for locomotives." If this is true, then why did the Colonel's son, a skilled and innovative mechanic, come to George Stephenson in Liverpool to see what he was doing and to order engines from him? But Mr. King outdoes even Herod, as he claims on behalf of the Colonel that steam was being used expansively in 1815, for which Watt had already secured a patent thirty-five years earlier. If college presidents in America can't address facts more accurately in their lectures, the education provided within the college will be viewed with significant skepticism.

In conclusion, I will only add a few remarks as to ocean steamers, on which subject, as on the invention of the engine, there is considerable difficulty in awarding the honours to any single individual. The Americans were the first to employ steamers along the coast, and the "Savannah," built by them in 1819, was the first vessel that crossed the ocean employing steam in any way as an assistant. But in her the steam was a very small auxiliary power, and upon the sails the vessel mainly depended. She cannot, therefore, fairly be called an ocean steamer. The "Enterprise," a vessel of 500 tons burden, with two 120 horse-power engines, started from London for Calcutta, touching at the Cape of Good Hope, about the year 1826; and may be fairly considered as the first vessel that made an ocean journey essentially dependent on steam. Subsequently the "Royal William," built at Quebec, after running between that port and Halifax from 1831 to 1833, started in the fall of the latter year for Falmouth; and to her belongs the honour of being the first bonâ fide paddle-wheel steamer that crossed the Atlantic. She was afterwards sold to the Portuguese government, and fitted up as a man-of-war steamer, under the name of the "Doña Isabella."

In conclusion, I’ll just add a few thoughts about ocean steamers. Just like with the invention of the engine, it’s tough to credit any one person with the achievement. The Americans were the first to use steamers along the coast, and the "Savannah," built by them in 1819, was the first ship to cross the ocean using steam in any capacity. However, steam was only a small part of her power, and she mainly relied on her sails. Because of this, she can't really be called an ocean steamer. The "Enterprise," a 500-ton vessel with two 120 horsepower engines, set off from London to Calcutta, stopping at the Cape of Good Hope, around 1826. This ship can be considered the first to make an ocean voyage largely powered by steam. Later, the "Royal William," built in Quebec, ran between that port and Halifax from 1831 to 1833, then left for Falmouth in the fall of 1833. She deserves the title of being the first genuine paddle-wheel steamer to cross the Atlantic. Eventually, she was sold to the Portuguese government and repurposed as a warship named "Doña Isabella."

If, however, it be asked, where oceanic communication took its rise, unquestionably that honour belongs to Bristol and the "Great Western," a steamer of 210 feet in length, 1240 tons, fitted with two engines of 210 horse-power each. This vessel started on the 8th of March, 1838, under the command of Captain Hosken, reached New York in thirteen days ten hours, and made the return passage in fifteen days. Since that date ocean steamers and steam companies have risen up like mushrooms. England and America have established a kind of weekly Derby, Cunard entering one horse and Collins the other. Unquestionably the Americans have been pioneers in improving the build, and a rivalry has sprung up which is as useful as it is honourable.

If someone asks where ocean communication began, it’s clear that honor goes to Bristol and the "Great Western," a steamer that’s 210 feet long and weighs 1,240 tons, equipped with two engines that each have 210 horsepower. This vessel set sail on March 8, 1838, under Captain Hosken, reached New York in thirteen days and ten hours, and made the return trip in fifteen days. Since then, ocean steamers and shipping companies have popped up everywhere. England and America have created a sort of weekly competition, with Cunard entering one ship and Collins entering another. It’s clear that Americans have led the way in improving design, creating a rivalry that is both beneficial and respectable.

The English boats adhere to a greater proportion of sail, in case of accidents to the engine; the Americans carry less sail than we do, for the sake of increasing the speed. As to relative comfort on board the two boats, an American gentleman, who had made several voyages, told me the only difference he ever discovered was, the same as exists between the hotels of the respective countries.—To return to litigation.

The English boats have a larger sail area in case of engine failures, while the Americans use less sail to boost speed. Regarding comfort aboard the two types of boats, an American gentleman who had taken several trips told me the only difference he noticed was similar to what you find between hotels in each country.—To get back to the topic of lawsuits.

Another claim frequently set up in America is the invention of the telegraph. Even in the Census Report—which I suppose may be considered a Government work—I read the following:—"It is to American ingenuity that we owe the practical application of the telegraph. While the honour is due to Professor Morse for the practical application and successful prosecution of the telegraph, it is mainly owing to the researches and discoveries of Professor Henry, and other scientific Americans, that he was enabled to perfect so valuable an invention." It is difficult to conceive a more unblushing piece of effrontery than the foregoing sentence, which proclaims throughout the Union that the electric telegraph in its practical working is the invention of one American, and in its scientific details the invention of other Americans, neither of which assertions has truth for its basis, and consequently the superstructure is a fiction—the only available excuse for which would be, that the writer had never heard of what was going on in Europe. Had he taken the least trouble to inquire into the subject before he wrote, he never would—it is to be hoped—have so grossly deceived his countrymen.

Another claim often made in America is that we invented the telegraph. Even in the Census Report—which I suppose can be seen as a government publication—I read the following: "We owe the practical application of the telegraph to American ingenuity. While the credit goes to Professor Morse for the practical implementation and successful development of the telegraph, it is largely due to the research and discoveries of Professor Henry and other American scientists that he was able to perfect such a valuable invention." It is hard to think of a more shameless piece of audacity than the statement above, which claims throughout the nation that the electric telegraph in its practical use is the invention of one American, and its scientific details the work of other Americans, neither of which claims is based on truth, making the entire assertion a fabrication—the only possible defense for which would be that the writer was unaware of what was happening in Europe. If he had taken the slightest effort to look into the matter before writing, he surely would not have so seriously misled his fellow citizens.

He might have easily ascertained that such men as Oersted, Ampère, Arago, Sturgeon, had mastered in detail the various scientific difficulties that stood in the way of the accomplishment of the long-desired object; and he might also have known that Cooke in England and Stienhiel in Germany had both overcome the practical difficulties before Professor Morse had enlightened the Republic with his system, which—like Bain's—is simply another method of producing the same result—i.e., telegraphic communication.

He could have easily figured out that people like Oersted, Ampère, Arago, and Sturgeon had thoroughly tackled the various scientific challenges that hindered the achievement of their long-awaited goal. He could also have known that Cooke in England and Stienhiel in Germany had both solved the practical problems before Professor Morse brought his system to the public, which—like Bain's—is just another way to achieve the same outcome—i.e., telegraphic communication.

Mr. Cooke took out his patent in conjunction with Professor Wheatstone, whose attention had long been turned to this subject, and whose name has been so much before the public, that not a few persons attribute the telegraph to him exclusively. There was, indeed, some dispute between them as to their respective claims, and the matter was referred to Sir I. Brunel and Professor Daniell for arbitration. The burden of their decision was, that Mr. Cooke was entitled to stand alone as the gentleman to whom Great Britain is indebted for having practically introduced and carried out the telegraph as a useful undertaking; Professor Wheatstone's profound and successful researches having already prepared the public to receive it.—So much for the justice of the American claim to the invention, which, like steam, has been the produce of many heads, and was brought into practical use first by Cooke, then by Stienhiel in Germany, and lastly by Morse in America.

Mr. Cooke filed his patent alongside Professor Wheatstone, who had been focused on this topic for a long time and whose name has been so widely recognized that many people unfairly attribute the invention of the telegraph solely to him. There was, in fact, some disagreement between them regarding their respective claims, and the issue was referred to Sir I. Brunel and Professor Daniell for arbitration. Their ruling was that Mr. Cooke had the right to stand as the person to whom Great Britain owes its practical introduction and implementation of the telegraph as a useful endeavor; meanwhile, Professor Wheatstone's extensive and successful research had already prepared the public to accept it. —This illustrates the fairness of the American claim to the invention, which, like steam, emerged from the efforts of many individuals and was first put into practical use by Cooke, then by Stienhiel in Germany, and finally by Morse in America.

Another invention of which the public have heard no little discussion lately is the reaping machine. To the American nation doubtless belongs the credit of forcing it into notice and into use; but as for any claim to the invention, it is equally certain they have none. That honour is due solely to the Rev. Patrick Bell, a Scotch minister in the presbytery of Arbroath. He first tried his reaping machine in August, 1828, at his father's farm on Lord Airlie's estate, where it has been in yearly use ever since; and in October he exhibited it at the Highland Society's meeting at Glasgow. The principle upon which his first machine was made differs in nothing from those making at this hour; and, as some of the people employed on his father's farm migrated to America, it is only reasonable to suppose they carried sufficient information with them to explain the machine. American ingenuity soon copied, and American energy soon gave an impulse to, Mr. Bell's machine, for which, though denying them the invention, we ought not to deny them our thanks.

Another invention that's been getting a lot of attention lately is the reaping machine. The American nation certainly deserves credit for bringing it to prominence and widespread use; however, they can't claim to have invented it. That honor belongs solely to Rev. Patrick Bell, a Scottish minister from the presbytery of Arbroath. He first tested his reaping machine in August 1828 at his father's farm on Lord Airlie's estate, where it has been used every year since then; and in October, he showcased it at the Highland Society's meeting in Glasgow. The design of his first machine is no different from those made today, and since some of the workers from his father's farm moved to America, it's reasonable to think they took enough knowledge with them to explain the machine. American creativity quickly adapted Mr. Bell's invention, and American determination gave it an additional boost, for which, even though we can't credit them with the invention, we should still express our gratitude.

But while I thus explain the unwarrantable claims which Americans have set forth, I must not allow John Bull to lay the flattering unction to his soul that none of his claimed discoveries are disputed on the other side of the Atlantic, I have seen a Book of Facts printed in America, which charges us with more than one geographical robbery in the Arctic Seas, in which regions, it is well known, American enterprise and sympathy have been most nobly employed. As I am incapable of balancing the respective claims, I leave that subject to the Hydrographer's office of the two countries.

But while I explain the unfounded claims that Americans have made, I can't let John Bull feel reassured that none of his claimed discoveries are challenged across the Atlantic. I've seen a Book of Facts published in America that accuses us of more than one geographical theft in the Arctic Seas, where it's well known that American effort and support have been most commendably applied. Since I can't weigh the respective claims, I'll leave that topic to the Hydrographer's office of both countries.

The citizens of the Republic have but little idea of the injurious effects which the putting forward unwarrantable claims has upon their just claims. I have now before me a letter from a seafaring man who has spent a quarter of a century upon the borders of the United States; he is writing on the subject of their claims to the invention of steam, and he winds up in these words:—"They are with this, as they are with every other thing to which either merit or virtue is attached—the sole and only proprietors and originators, and say both the one and the other are unknown out of the universal Yankee nation." I do not endorse the sentiment, but I quote it to show the effect produced on some minds by the unfounded claims they have put forward.

The citizens of the Republic have very little awareness of the harmful effects that making baseless claims has on their legitimate claims. I have a letter from a seafaring man who has spent twenty-five years along the borders of the United States; he is writing about their claims to the invention of steam, and he concludes with these words:—"They are like they are with everything else that has either merit or virtue attached to it—the sole and only owners and creators, claiming that both are unknown outside of the entire Yankee nation." I don’t agree with this viewpoint, but I’m quoting it to illustrate the impact that these unfounded claims have on some people's minds.

They have ingenuity and invention enough legitimately belonging to them for any nation to be justly proud of, without plucking peacock's feathers from others, and sending them throughout the length and breadth of the Republic as the plumage of the American eagle. How many useful inventions have they not made in machinery for working wood? Is not England daily importing some new improvement therein from the American shores? Look again at their perfect and beautiful invention for the manufacture of seamless bags, by Mr. Cyrus Baldwin, and which he has at work at the Stark Mills. There are 126 looms in operation, all self-acting and each one making 47 bags daily; the bags are a little more than three and a half feet long, and chiefly used, I believe, for flour and grain. When they are finished, sewing-machines are at hand, which can hem at the rate of 650 bags each daily. This same gentleman has also adapted his looms to the making hoses for water, of which he can complete 1000 feet a day by the experimental loom now in use, and it is more than probable these hoses will entirely supersede the use of the leather ones, being little more than one-tenth the price, and not requiring any expense to keep in order.

They have enough creativity and innovation rightfully belonging to them for any nation to be truly proud of, without taking credit from others and spreading it across the country as if it were their own. How many useful inventions have they created in machinery for working with wood? Isn’t England constantly importing new advancements from American shores? Look again at their amazing invention for making seamless bags, developed by Mr. Cyrus Baldwin, currently in operation at the Stark Mills. There are 126 looms running, all automated, with each one producing 47 bags daily; the bags are just over three and a half feet long and mostly used for flour and grain, I believe. Once they're finished, sewing machines are ready, capable of hemming at a rate of 650 bags each day. This same gentleman has also modified his looms for making hoses for water, of which he can produce 1,000 feet a day with the experimental loom currently in use, and it’s likely these hoses will completely replace the leather ones, costing only about one-tenth as much and requiring no maintenance.

Another and very important purpose to which their ingenuity has applied machinery is, the manufacture of fire-arms. It has long been a matter of surprise to me, why so obvious and useful an application of machinery was neglected by the Government at home. The advantages of being able to transfer all screws, springs, nipples, hammers, &c., from one musket to another, are so manifest to the most infantine comprehension, that I suppose they considered it beneath their notice; nor can I make out that they have duly inquired into the various breech-loading systems used in the States, some of which they have been testing in their Navy for years. As, however, we are beginning to copy their application of machinery, I dare say the next generation will take up the question of breech-loading arms.

Another important use of their ingenuity in machinery is the production of firearms. I've always been surprised that the government back home overlooked such an obvious and useful application of machinery. The benefits of being able to transfer all screws, springs, nipples, hammers, etc., from one musket to another are so clear that even a child could understand. I guess they thought it wasn't worth their attention; I also can't see that they've properly examined the various breech-loading systems used in the States, some of which they've been testing in their Navy for years. However, since we are starting to adopt their use of machinery, I’m sure the next generation will address the issue of breech-loading arms.

A few observations on the Militia appear to follow naturally after remarks on fire-arms. According to the most reliable information which I have been able to obtain, every able-bodied male between 18 and 40 years of age is liable to militia service. Those who do not serve are subject to a fine, varying in different States, from 3s. upwards; which sum helps to pay those who do duty. The pay of a private while on duty is about 10s. a-day, and that of officers in proportion. Formerly, they only turned out two days in the year; now I believe, they generally turn out ten, and in some of the cities twenty, days annually. The persons excused from militia service, are the clergy, medical men, fire companies, and those who have held a commission for three years. Each regiment settles its own uniform; and it is a strange sight to see companies in French, German, and Highland uniforms, all marching gaily through the streets.

A few thoughts on the militia seem to follow naturally after discussing firearms. Based on the most reliable information I could gather, every able-bodied man between 18 and 40 years old is required to serve in the militia. Those who don’t serve face a fine that varies by state, starting from 3s. and up; this amount helps pay those who do serve. A private on duty earns about 10s. a day, with officers earning more according to their rank. In the past, they only trained for two days a year; now, I believe they usually train for ten days, and in some cities, even twenty days each year. People exempt from militia service include clergy, medical professionals, fire companies, and those who have held a commission for three years. Each regiment decides its own uniform, and it's quite a sight to see companies in French, German, and Highland uniforms all marching happily through the streets.

The day of firing at a mark is quite a fête; they parade the town, with the target untouched, on their road to the ground: there they commence firing, at 100 yards; if the bull's-eye be not sufficiently riddled, they get closer and closer, until, perforated and in shreds, it scarce hangs together as they return through the town bearing it aloft in triumph, and followed by all the washed, half-washed, and unwashed aspirants to military glory.

The day of shooting at a target is quite a celebration; they parade through town with the target intact on their way to the range: there they start shooting from 100 yards away; if the bull's-eye isn't damaged enough, they move closer and closer until it's torn to pieces and barely holds together as they head back through the town proudly carrying it aloft, followed by all the clean, semi-clean, and unclean hopefuls seeking military glory.

I believe the good sense of the people is endeavouring to break through the system of nationalizing the companies into French, German, Highland, &c., believing that keeping up such distinctions is more calculated to produce discord than harmony. How long it will be before they succeed in eradicating these separate nationalities, I cannot pretend to say.

I think the common sense of the people is trying to overcome the system of nationalizing companies into French, German, Highland, etc., believing that maintaining these distinctions is more likely to create discord than harmony. I can't say how long it will take before they manage to eliminate these separate nationalities.

With respect to their numbers, I cannot give any accurate information. The American Almanack—generally a very useful source of information—puts them down at 2,202,113; which is evidently a little bit of Buncombe, as those figures represent very nearly the whole able-bodied men in the Republic between the ages of 18 and 40. As they are liable to be called on, the Almanack puts them down as though regularly enrolled; their real numbers I leave to the fertility of the imagination. In the same authority, I find the officers calculated at 76,920, of which 765 are generals. These numbers, I imagine, must also go through a powerful process of subtraction before the exact truth would be arrived at, although I believe there are twice 765 citizens who enjoy the titular honour.

Regarding their numbers, I can’t provide any accurate information. The American Almanack—which is usually a very useful source—lists them as 2,202,113; which is clearly exaggerated, as that figure represents nearly all able-bodied men in the Republic aged 18 to 40. Since they could be called up, the Almanack counts them as if they were officially enlisted; I leave their actual numbers to your imagination. In the same source, I find that the officers are estimated at 76,920, including 765 generals. I suspect these numbers also need significant revision before we get to the actual truth, even though I believe there are double the 765 citizens who hold the title.

One fact, however, is beyond doubt; they have a large militia, accustomed to, and fond of, using fire-arms; and those who feel disposed to approach their shores with hostile intentions, will find the old Scotch motto applicable to them in its fullest sense,—

One thing is clear; they have a large militia that is used to and enjoys using firearms, and anyone who wants to approach their shores with hostile intentions will find the old Scottish motto applies to them in every sense.

"Nemo me impune lacessit."

FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

The Marquis de Jouffroy is said to have worked a boat by steam on the Seine in 1781; but the Revolution breaking out, he appears to have been unable to complete his invention.


The foregoing details are essentially extracted from a work by Mr. Woodcroft, professor of machinery at University College, London; who, after proving that the previous inventions of his countrymen were combined together, for the first time, in the boat engined by Symington, thus clearly and summarily disposes of the pretensions put forward in favour of Fulton:—"In fact, if these inventions separately, or as a combination, were removed out of Fulton's boat, nothing would be left but the hull; and if the hull could then be divested of that peculiarity of form, admitted to have been derived from Colonel Beaufoy's experiments, all that would remain would be the hull of a boat of ordinary construction."



CHAPTER XXX.

Adverse Influences.




I now come to the consideration of the annual celebration of the 4th July, an event which presents itself to my mind under two opposite aspects, the one beneficial, the other injurious. If contemplated as a nation's grateful acknowledgment to Providence for the successful termination of an arduous struggle for independence, it assumes an aspect at once dignified and Christian; but if into its celebration other elements enter which are calculated to nourish hostile feelings towards those who have long ceased to reciprocate such unworthy sentiments, in that case I think its aspect may be fairly termed both injurious and unchristian.

I now want to talk about the annual celebration of July 4th, an event that I see in two very different ways: one positive and the other negative. If we view it as a nation's grateful recognition of Providence for successfully ending a tough fight for independence, it seems dignified and in line with Christian values. However, if the celebration includes aspects that stir up hostile feelings towards those who have long stopped sharing such negative sentiments, then I think we can fairly call it both harmful and un-Christian.

Let me then call your attention to the method of celebration. It consists of three parts:—First, the reading of the Declaration of Independence; secondly, an oration on the subject; lastly, procession and jollification.

Let me then draw your attention to the way we celebrate. It has three parts: first, reading the Declaration of Independence; second, a speech on the topic; and lastly, a parade and festivities.

Now what is the Declaration of Independence? It is a document which details their views of the oppression and injustice which justified their rebellion against the mother country. The clauses are too numerous to quote in full, but I subjoin a few, that the reader may form his own opinion. Speaking of the sovereign of Great Britain, they say he has protected "armed troops among us, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these States. He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. He is, at this time, transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun, with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation. He has constrained our fellow-citizens taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions. In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people."

Now, what is the Declaration of Independence? It’s a document that outlines their views on the oppression and injustice that justified their rebellion against the mother country. The clauses are too many to quote in full, but I’m including a few so that the reader can form their own opinion. Speaking about the king of Great Britain, they state he has protected "armed troops among us, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders they commit against the people of these States. He has plundered our seas, devastated our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. Right now, he is transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to finish the work of death, destruction, and tyranny that has already begun, with acts of cruelty and betrayal that are almost unmatched in the most barbaric times and completely unworthy of the leader of a civilized nation. He has forced our fellow citizens captured on the high seas to fight against their country, making them executioners of their friends and family, or causing them to die at their hands. He has incited domestic uprisings among us and has tried to bring upon the people of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known way of war is indiscriminate destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions. At every stage of these oppressions, we have asked for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have only been met with repeated harm. A prince whose character is defined by every act that can mark a tyrant is unfit to rule a free people."

I pause not to ask if any of these charges are correct or not: grant them accuracy in every statement, nay more, admit that they were eminently calculated to stir up the feelings of the colonists, and to inflame that spirit which was requisite to make their struggle for independence justifiable and successful, and that they were therefore called for by the emergencies of the day;—but nearly eighty years have rolled over since that Declaration was penned; there is no success sought for now which renders such appeals necessary, and surely it is not for the purpose of justifying their rebellion that they are made. Where then is the good to be derived from such declarations? Is there any misgiving in the Republic as to sentiments of patriotism or pluck? Surely none. But who can help seeing the evil to which they lead? These annual recapitulations of old grievances, buried beneath nearly a century, must tend to excite hostile feelings towards England. Conceive for one moment France reading annually a declaration of independence from British arms on the anniversary of their recapture of Calais, and engrossing in that document every injustice or atrocity which the English perpetrated during their rule; not to mention the undignified nature of such a course, who can doubt that it would be pre-eminently calculated to generate those hostile feelings which it is the bounden duty of all civilized States to allay? In short, what does it so much resemble as the system by which, in barbarous days long since past, the Highland clans used to perpetuate their feuds. If a Christian community cannot glory in and commemorate national independence without such adjuncts, such a ceremony would, in my humble opinion, be more honoured in the breach than in the observance.

I won’t stop to question whether any of these claims are true: I’ll grant that they are accurate in every statement, and in fact, admit that they were designed to stir the emotions of the colonists and ignite the spirit necessary for making their fight for independence justifiable and successful, and that they were called for by the circumstances of the time;—but nearly eighty years have passed since that Declaration was written; there’s no success being sought now that makes such appeals necessary, and it surely isn’t to justify their rebellion that they are made. So where is the benefit to be gained from such declarations? Is there any doubt in the Republic regarding patriotism or courage? Certainly not. But who can fail to see the harm they cause? These yearly reminders of old grievances, buried for nearly a century, will only stir up negative feelings toward England. Imagine for a moment if France read an annual declaration of independence from British rule on the anniversary of their recapture of Calais, detailing every injustice or atrocity committed by the English during their rule; besides the undignified nature of such an act, who can doubt that it would surely generate the hostility that all civilized nations should work to lessen? In short, what does it resemble more than the ways that, in brutal times long ago, the Highland clans used to keep their feuds alive? If a Christian community cannot celebrate and remember national independence without such additions, then in my humble opinion, it would be better to ignore such a ceremony than to observe it.

Among other pernicious influences, I should mention that the Irish celebrate the battle of the Boyne annually in order to prevent their national angry passions from subsiding. Not the least curious features in these same Paddies is the fact that, while cursing England for her treatment of Ireland, they all unite as one man in favour of Slavery. Mr. Mitchell, the escaped convict, is said to have expressed his opinion that a plantation on the Alabama river with fifty sleek slaves, was the beau idéal of a terrestrial paradise. If he be a bachelor, and still entertain the same sentiments, I would recommend him to take "The stewardess of the Lady Franklin" as the sharer of his joys.

Among other harmful influences, I should point out that the Irish celebrate the battle of the Boyne every year to keep their national anger alive. One of the most interesting things about these same Irish is that, while they complain about how England treats Ireland, they all come together in support of slavery. Mr. Mitchell, the escaped convict, is said to have voiced his belief that a plantation on the Alabama river with fifty well-fed slaves was the ideal version of paradise on earth. If he is still single and holds the same views, I would suggest he consider "The stewardess of the Lady Franklin" as the partner in his happiness.

With regard to the orations pronounced, the one I heard at Geneseo had nothing that struck me as in any way lending itself to those feelings I have so freely censured; but it is not always so. I have before me now an epitome of a speech made by the Honourable D.S. Dickenson, at Syracuse, on July 4th, 1853. Being an honourable, it is not unfair to suppose him—mind, I say to suppose him—a man of superior attainment, selected by a well-educated people. The epitome is headed "Vigorous Discussion and Patriotic Sentiments." I only quote one passage, which I could almost fancy Matthew Ward, the hero of the Louisville school-room, had written; it runs thus—"The eloquent orator then went on for nearly half an hour in a strain of withering sarcasm and invective, exposing the shameless and wicked oppressions of England in her collieries, in her factories, in her oppression of Ireland; denouncing her as a nation whose history was written in oppression and blood (great applause.)"—It is difficult to believe that the chosen representative of an intelligent community should thus speak of that nation to which his own country is indebted for nearly every valuable institution she possesses; but when such ridiculous vituperation is received with shouts of applause from the gaping rowdies who throng around him, does it not clearly demonstrate the truth of my previous statements as to the effects which the celebration of the 4th of July, as now observed, may naturally lead to? I say, may lead to, because I would fain hope, for the sake of the credit and dignity of the Republic, that such disreputable orations are rare exceptions.

Regarding the speeches I’ve heard, the one at Geneseo didn’t strike me as conducive to the feelings I’ve criticized so openly; however, that’s not always the case. I now have a summary of a speech given by the Honorable D.S. Dickenson in Syracuse on July 4, 1853. Since he’s an honorable, it’s reasonable to assume—mind you, I say assume—that he’s a person of high achievement, chosen by a well-informed public. The summary is titled "Vigorous Discussion and Patriotic Sentiments." I’ll quote just one passage, which I could almost imagine Matthew Ward, the hero of the Louisville classroom, wrote; it goes like this—“The eloquent orator then went on for nearly half an hour in a tone of biting sarcasm and rage, exposing the shameless and cruel oppressions of England in her coal mines, her factories, and her oppression of Ireland; denouncing her as a nation whose history is marked by oppression and blood (great applause)." It’s hard to believe that a chosen representative from an educated community would speak about the very nation his own country owes for almost every valuable institution it has; but when such ridiculous insults are met with cheers from the crowd around him, doesn’t it clearly illustrate the truth of my earlier statements about the effects the 4th of July celebrations, as currently practiced, can naturally produce? I say can produce because I really hope, for the sake of the Republic's reputation and dignity, that such disgraceful speeches are rare exceptions.

But that such feelings of aversion to the mother country are generated among the masses, is proved indirectly in another quarter—viz., Congress. During the debate on the Clayton-Bulwer treaty, a Mr. Douglas, to whom I have before alluded, and who may be considered as the representative of the rabid and rowdy portion of the community, thus expresses himself with regard to England: "It is impossible she can love us,—I do not blame her for not loving us,—sir, we have wounded her vanity and humbled her pride,—she can never forgive us. But for us, she would be the first Power on the face of the earth,—but for us, she would have the prospect of maintaining that proud position which she held for so long a period. We are in her way. She is jealous of us; and jealousy forbids the idea of friendship. England does not love us; she cannot love us, and we cannot love her either. We have some things in the past to remember that are not agreeable. She has more in the present to humiliate her that she cannot forgive."—After which expressions, the poor little man, as though he had not the slightest conception of the meaning of the words he was using, adds the following sentence, deprecating all he had previously uttered: "I do not wish to administer to the feeling of jealousy and rivalry that exists between us and England. I wish to soften and smooth it down as much as possible."

But the fact that many people feel negatively toward the mother country is shown indirectly in another place—namely, Congress. During the debate on the Clayton-Bulwer treaty, a Mr. Douglas, whom I mentioned earlier, and who represents the more extreme and rowdy parts of the community, said this about England: "It's impossible for her to love us—I don't blame her for not loving us—sir, we have hurt her pride and damaged her self-respect—she can never forgive us. If it weren't for us, she would be the top power in the world—if it weren't for us, she would still have the chance to maintain that proud position she held for such a long time. We are in her way. She is jealous of us, and jealousy rules out the possibility of friendship. England doesn't love us; she can't love us, and we can't love her either. We have some unpleasant things in our past to remember. She has more current humiliations that she can't forgive."—After saying all this, the poor little man, as if he didn't truly understand the meaning of his words, added a final sentence, trying to dismiss everything he'd just said: "I don't want to stir up the feelings of jealousy and rivalry between us and England. I want to ease and smooth it over as much as possible."

On a subsequent occasion, Mr. Butler, senator for South Carolina, who honestly did deprecate such language as the foregoing, referred, by way of contrast, to the many constitutional principles the Republic had derived from England, and also to the valuable literature which she had produced, and by which the Republic had benefited. Upon which, poor Mr. Douglas got furious, and asserted, that "Every English book circulated contains lurking and insidious slanders and libels upon the character of our people and the institutions and policy of our Government."—He then discovered that abolitionism began, in England, and that "she keeps her missionaries perambulating this country, delivering lectures and scattering abroad incendiary publications, designed to excite prejudices, hate, and strife between the different sections of the Union."—He then, with Illinois truthfulness, hints at Uncle Tom's Cabin, as though it were English literature, and which, he says, "is designed to stir up treason and insurrection around his—Mr. Butler's—fireside," &c.—He returns to the charge, and asserts, with equal accuracy, "Millions are being expended to distribute Uncle Tom's Cabin throughout the world, with the view of combining the fanaticism, ignorance, and hatred of all the nations of the earth in a common crusade against the peculiar institutions of the State and section of this Union represented by the senator from South Carolina." One might almost imagine that the copy of Webster's Dictionary, which Mr. Douglas has in his library—if he possess such a thing—has omitted an old English word, spelt T R U T H.

On another occasion, Mr. Butler, the senator from South Carolina, who genuinely disapproved of such language, contrasted it with the many constitutional principles the Republic had inherited from England, as well as the valuable literature it had produced, which benefited the Republic. At this, poor Mr. Douglas became furious and claimed, "Every English book circulated contains hidden and insidious slanders and libels against our people and the institutions and policies of our Government." He then pointed out that abolitionism started in England and that "she sends her missionaries across this country, giving lectures and spreading incendiary publications designed to stir up prejudice, hatred, and conflict between the different sections of the Union." He then, with characteristic honesty from Illinois, referred to Uncle Tom's Cabin as if it were English literature, claiming it "is meant to incite treason and rebellion around his—Mr. Butler's—fireside," etc. He repeated his accusations and asserted, with equal precision, "Millions are being spent to distribute Uncle Tom's Cabin throughout the world, aiming to unite the fanaticism, ignorance, and hatred of all nations in a common crusade against the distinctive institutions of the State and section of this Union represented by the senator from South Carolina." One might almost think that the copy of Webster's Dictionary, which Mr. Douglas has in his library—if he actually owns one—has left out an old English word spelled T R U T H.

But the point I wish to call the reader's especial attention to, is, that the little senator's rabid rhapsody was received with shouts of gallery applause, which, as I have before observed, is an exhibition of sentiment not allowed in the Senate to either members of Congress or gallery. Yet, so thoroughly had he expressed the feelings of the said rowdies, that they could not resist the unlawful burst of approval. Mr. Butler of course replied to his absurd arguments; but my object is not discussion. I only allude to the subject at all for the purpose of proving my previous assertion, that within the walls of Congress itself, elements calculated to engender feelings of animosity towards Great Britain are to be found at work. It is this deep-seated consciousness of guilt that makes that portion of the citizens of the Republic so sensitive with regard to the observations which proceed from this country. Americans like Mr. Butler, who maintain the dignity of their country without descending to paltry popularity-hunting calumny, can afford to read any criticisms which may come from across the water with as much calmness as American remarks are read here. Such men have no accusing conscience gnawing at their vitals. If the population of the two countries were fed upon Judge Douglas's venomous diet, ere long, like the Kilkenny cats, nothing but the tails would be left.

But the point I want to highlight is that the little senator's wild rant received loud cheers from the audience, which, as I’ve mentioned before, is not something allowed in the Senate from either Congress members or the spectators. Still, he expressed the feelings of those spectators so well that they couldn't help but break into applause. Mr. Butler, of course, responded to his ridiculous arguments, but my intention isn't to spark a debate. I only bring this up to support my earlier claim that there are factors within Congress that foster feelings of animosity towards Great Britain. This deep awareness of guilt makes certain citizens of the Republic overly sensitive to comments coming from this country. Americans like Mr. Butler, who uphold the dignity of their nation without resorting to petty attempts at popularity, can handle any criticisms from overseas with as much composure as American comments are handled here. Such individuals have no guilty conscience weighing them down. If the people of both nations were fed on Judge Douglas's toxic rhetoric, soon, like the Kilkenny cats, all that would remain would be their tails.

I have felt it imperative to make these remarks, that my countrymen may understand why they so constantly find the strongest symptoms of hostility to England in a certain class of American writers. Even in the text-books for children, you can detect the same animus working. Miss Willard, in her History of the United States, narrates that six Indian chiefs came to Colonel Washington, the grandfather of the founder of the Republic, to treat for peace. The treachery to, and cold-blooded murder of, these poor Indians she disposes of thus:—"He wrongfully put them to death." General Clinton's conduct, in the prosecution of his duties to his country, which never displayed any such revolting act, she describes as reviving in a civilized age "barbarous atrocities."—Take another instance of amiable sentiments towards England, as exhibited by the Common Council of New York, who voted 200l. to entertain John Mitchell, the convict who had escaped from custody. The Mayor addresses him in the following terms:—"When, sir, you were silenced by restraint, overpowered by brutal force, and foreign bayonets were employed on your own soil to suppress truth and to bind upon your limbs and mind the shackles of slavery, we sympathized with you in your adversity. We hated the tyrant and loved the victim. And when, sir, after the semblance of a trial, you were condemned and hurried as a felon from your home, your country, and your friends, to a distant land, we were filled with indignation, and pledged a deeper hatred towards the enemies of man."—Mr. Mitchell, in reply, confesses himself from earliest youth a traitor to his country, and honours the British Government with the following epithets: "I say to them that they are not a government at all, but a gang of conspirators, of robbers, of murderers." These sentiments were received by the multitude around with "great applause." Considering how many causes for exciting ill-will exist, the only wonder is that, when so large a portion of the Republicans are utterly ignorant of the truth as regards England, the feeling is not more hostile.

I feel it's important to say this so my fellow countrymen understand why they often see strong hostility towards England among certain American writers. Even in kids' textbooks, you can spot the same bias at play. Miss Willard, in her History of the United States, recounts how six Indian chiefs came to Colonel Washington, the grandfather of the Republic's founder, to negotiate for peace. She dismisses the betrayal and cold-blooded murder of these poor Indians with the remark: "He wrongfully put them to death." In contrast, she describes General Clinton’s actions in serving his country, which never involved such a shocking act, as reviving "barbarous atrocities" in a civilized age. —Another example of a friendly sentiment towards England comes from the Common Council of New York, which voted £200 to entertain John Mitchell, the convict who escaped from custody. The Mayor addresses him saying: "When, sir, you were silenced by restraint, overpowered by brutal force, and foreign bayonets were used on your own soil to suppress truth and bind you in the chains of slavery, we felt for you in your struggle. We hated the tyrant and loved the victim. And when, sir, after the appearance of a trial, you were condemned and hastily taken from your home, country, and friends to a far-off land, we were filled with anger and promised a deeper hatred for the enemies of humanity." —Mr. Mitchell, in response, admits he has been a traitor to his country since he was young and refers to the British Government in these terms: "I say they are not a government at all, but a group of conspirators, robbers, and murderers." These views were met with "great applause" from the crowd. Given how many reasons there are for resentment, the only surprise is that, with so many Republicans completely unaware of the truth about England, the feeling isn't more hostile.

It is needless to assert, that the feelings of jealousy and animosity ascribed to England by Mr. Douglas, exist only in the disordered imagination of his own brain and of those of the deluded gulls who follow in his train: for I am proud to say no similar undignified and antagonistic elements are at work here; and, if any attempt were made to introduce them, the good sense of the country would unite with one voice to cry them down. I defy all the educated, ignorant, or rabid population of the Republic to bring forward any instance where, either in the celebration of any ceremony, the orations of any senator, or the meetings of any corporation, such unworthy and contemptible animosity towards the United States has ever been shadowed forth.

It’s unnecessary to say that the feelings of jealousy and hostility that Mr. Douglas attributes to England exist only in his disordered imagination and that of the misguided followers who support him. I’m proud to say that no such undignified and antagonistic sentiments are at play here; and if anyone tried to introduce them, the common sense of this country would come together as one to reject them. I challenge anyone—whether educated, ignorant, or extreme in their views—to provide an example where, in any ceremony, the speeches of any senator, or the meetings of any organization, such unworthy and contemptible animosity towards the United States has ever been expressed.

I must not, however, allow the reader to understand from the foregoing remark that there is an universal national antipathy to England; although, whenever she is brought into juxtaposition with the Republic, it may appear very strongly developed. The most erroneous impressions were at the time this was written, abroad among my countrymen, in respect of American sympathies with Russia. Filibusteros, rabid annexationists, inveterate Slaveholders, and Rowdies of every class, to which might have been added a few ignoble minds who made the grave of conscience a "stump" from which to pour forth Buncombe speeches to catch ephemeral popularity, constituted the body in America who sympathised with Russia. All the intelligence of the North, and a great portion of that of the South, felt the deepest interest in our success, not merely as descendants of the mother country, but also because they recognised the war in which we were engaged as a struggle in the cause of liberty. We could not suffer ourselves to be deceived by the Filibustero Press, nor by the accounts we read of vessels laden with arms carrying them to Russia. Those were no more proofs of the national feeling, than the building of slave-clippers every year at Baltimore is a proof that the nation wishes to encourage the slave-trade. The true feeling of a nation must be sought for far deeper than in the superficial clamour of political demagogues, backed though it be by the applause of gaping crowds whose worst passions are pandered to for the sake of a transient breath of popularity.

I shouldn’t allow the reader to think from my earlier comment that there's a universal dislike for England; even though it may seem very strong whenever England is compared to the Republic. At the time this was written, there were many misconceptions abroad among my fellow countrymen regarding American sympathies with Russia. Filibusterers, extreme annexation supporters, committed slaveholders, and rowdies of all kinds, along with a few despicable individuals who turned their conscience into a "stump" to give empty speeches for short-lived popularity, made up the group in America that sympathized with Russia. Most people in the North, and a significant number in the South, were deeply interested in our success, not just because we were descendants of England, but because they saw the war we were fighting as a battle for freedom. We couldn’t let ourselves be misled by the Filibustero Press or by reports of ships loaded with weapons going to Russia. Those were no more evidence of the national sentiment than the annual construction of slave ships in Baltimore shows that the country wants to promote the slave trade. The true feelings of a nation must be dug out much deeper than the superficial noise of political demagogues, even if it’s supported by the cheers of crowds whose worst instincts are played on for a moment of fleeting popularity.


CHAPTER XXXI.

Olla Podrida.




The preceding observations lead naturally to a few observations upon American character in a national point of view; for in treating of so exceedingly varied a community, combining as it does nearly every nation of the Old World, it would be beyond the limits of a work like this to enter into details on so complicated a subject.

The previous thoughts naturally lead to a few comments about American character from a national perspective. When discussing such a diverse community that includes nearly every nation from the Old World, it would be too much for a work like this to dive into details on such a complex topic.

As I prefer commencing with the objectionable points, and winding up with the more favourable, I shall first name Vanity as a great national feature. The fulsome adulation with which the Press bespatters its readers, throughout the length and breadth of the Union, wherever any comparisons are drawn with other nations, is so great that the masses have become perfectly deluded; and being so far removed from the nations of the Old World, and knowing, consequently, nothing of them except through the columns of a vanity-feeding Press, they receive the most exaggerated statements as though they were Gospel truths—little aware how supremely ridiculous the vaunting which they read with delight makes them appear in the eyes of other people.

As I like to start with the negative points and finish with the positive ones, I’ll begin by mentioning Vanity as a major national trait. The excessive praise that the Press piles on its readers across the entire country, especially when comparing us to other nations, is so overwhelming that people have become completely fooled. Since they are so far removed from the nations of the Old World and know almost nothing about them except through the vanity-driven Press, they accept the most exaggerated claims as if they were absolute truths—unaware of how utterly ridiculous the bragging they enjoy reading makes them look to others.

I insert the following extract from the Press, as one instance among many of the vain and ridiculous style of some of their editorial leaders. It is taken from the New York Herald—one of the most widely-circulated papers in the Union, but one which, I am bound in justice to say, is held in contempt[CK] by the more intelligent portion of the community. Speaking of Mrs. B. Stowe's reception in England, he says:—"She proves herself quite an American in her intercourse with the English aristocracy. Her self-possession, ease, and independence of manner were quite undisturbed in the presence of the proud duchesses and fraughty dames of the titled English nobility. They expected timidity and fear, and reverence for their titles, in an untitled person, and they found themselves disappointed. Mrs. Stowe felt herself their equal in social life, and acted among them as she felt. This, above all other things, has caused a great astonishment in the higher circles in favour of American women, for in fact it is a quality peculiarly distinguishing an American woman, that she can be and is a duchess among duchesses."

I’m including the following excerpt from the Press as an example of the pretentious and silly style of some of their editorial pieces. It's taken from the New York Herald—one of the most widely-read newspapers in the country, but I must say, it’s looked down upon by the more educated segment of the community. Commenting on Mrs. B. Stowe's reception in England, it says:—"She shows herself to be quite an American in her interactions with the English aristocracy. Her confidence, ease, and independence of demeanor remained completely unshaken in the presence of the proud duchesses and haughty ladies of the titled English nobility. They expected her to be timid, fearful, and to show reverence for their titles as someone without a title herself, and they were disappointed. Mrs. Stowe considered herself their equal socially and acted accordingly. This, more than anything else, has caused quite a stir among the upper class in favor of American women, as it’s a distinctive trait of an American woman that she can and is a duchess among duchesses."

Even in the simple article of diplomatic dress we see the same feature peeping out. Vanity may be discovered as readily in singularity, however simple, as in the naked savage who struts about as proud as a peacock, with no covering but a gold-laced cocked hat on his head and a brass-mounted sword at his side. When civilized society agrees upon some distinctive uniform for diplomatic service, who can fail to observe the lurking vanity that dictated the abolition of it by the Republic?—not to mention the absurdity of wearing a sword in plain clothes. The only parallel it has among bipeds, that I know of, is a master-at-arms on board a ship, with a cane by his side; but then he carries a weapon which he is supposed to use. The Minister of the Republic carries a weapon for ornament only. In quadruped life, it reminds me of a poodle closely shaved all over, except a little tuft at the end of his tail, the sword and the tuft recalling to mind the fact that the respective possessors have been shorn of something.

Even in something as straightforward as diplomatic attire, we notice the same characteristic shining through. You can spot vanity just as easily in something unique, no matter how simple, as in a naked savage walking around proudly like a peacock, with nothing but a gold-trimmed hat on his head and a brass-handled sword by his side. When society decides on a specific uniform for diplomats, who can ignore the hidden vanity that led to its removal by the Republic?—not to mention the ridiculousness of wearing a sword with casual clothes. The only similar example among humans that I’m aware of is a master-at-arms on a ship, with a cane at his side; but he carries a weapon that he's expected to use. The Minister of the Republic carries a sword just for show. In the animal kingdom, it reminds me of a poodle that’s been closely shaved everywhere except for a little tuft at the end of its tail; the sword and the tuft highlighting the fact that their owners have lost something.

Firmly convinced, from my earliest schoolboy days, of the intimate connexion which exists between boasting and bullying, I had long blushed to feel how pre-eminent my own country was in the ignoble practice; but a more intimate acquaintance with the United States has thoroughly satisfied me that that pre-eminence justly belongs to the great Republic. But it is not merely in national matters that this feeling exhibits itself; you observe it in ordinary life as well, by the intense love shown for titles; nobody is contented until he obtain some rank. I am aware this is a feature inseparable from democracy. Everybody you meet is Captain, Colonel, General, Honourable, Judge, or something; and if they cannot obtain it legitimately, they obtain it by courtesy, or sometimes facetiously, like a gentleman I have before alluded to, who obtained the rank of judge because he was a connoisseur in wine. In these, and a thousand other ways, the love of vanity stands nationally revealed.

From my earliest school days, I was firmly convinced of the close connection between boasting and bullying. I often felt embarrassed by how my own country excelled in this unworthy practice, but getting to know the United States better has made me realize that this distinction rightfully belongs to the great Republic. It’s not just in national matters that this tendency shows; you can see it in everyday life too, especially in the intense desire for titles. No one seems satisfied until they’ve achieved some kind of rank. I know this is a trait that comes with democracy. Everyone you meet is a Captain, Colonel, General, Honorable, Judge, or something similar; and if they can’t achieve it legitimately, they’ll get it through courtesy or occasionally jokingly, like the gentleman I mentioned earlier who earned the title of judge simply because he was a wine expert. In these and countless other ways, this love of vanity is on full display nationally.

I do not think Americans are aware what injustice they do themselves by this love of high-sounding titles.[CL] For instance, in a paper before me, I see a Deputy Sheriff calling on the mob to resist the law; I see Governor Bigler authorizing General King to call out the military, one naturally supposes to keep order; but observe he calls Mr. Walker, of Erie, a traitor and a scoundrel; of the directors and managers of the railroad, he says, "We will whip them, will whip them, will bury them so deep electricity can't reach them—we will whip them—we will whip the g—ts out of them!" &c.—Now, judging of these people by their titles, as recognised by the rest of the civilized world, what a disgrace to the higher classes of Americans is the foregoing! But anybody who really knows the title system of the Republic will at once see that the orator was a mere rowdy. Thus they suffer for their vanity. It pervades every class of the whole community, from the rowdy, who talks of "whipping creation," to the pulpit orator, who often heralds forth past success to feed the insatiable appetite: in short, it has become a national disease; and were it not for the safety-valve formed by the unmeasured terms of mutual vituperation they heap upon each other on occasions of domestic squabbles, their fate would assuredly be that of the frog in the fable.

I don’t think Americans realize the injustice they inflict on themselves with their obsession with lofty titles.[CL] For example, in a document I have in front of me, I see a Deputy Sheriff urging the mob to defy the law; I see Governor Bigler giving General King the authority to summon the military, which one would naturally assume is to maintain order; but notice he calls Mr. Walker from Erie a traitor and a scoundrel; regarding the railroad's directors and managers, he declares, "We will beat them, we will beat them, we will bury them so deep that electricity can't reach them—we will beat them—we will beat the hell out of them!" &c.—Now, judging by their titles, as recognized by the rest of the civilized world, what a disgrace to the upper classes of Americans this is! However, anyone who truly understands the title system of the Republic will immediately see that the speaker was nothing more than a loudmouth. Thus, they suffer for their vanity. It affects every class of the entire community, from the loudmouth who brags about "beating everyone" to the pulpit speaker who often boasts of past achievements to satisfy the endless desire: in short, it has become a national disease; and if it weren't for the pressure release created by the excessive insults they hurl at each other during domestic disputes, their fate would surely resemble that of the frog in the fable.

In the medical world, it is said no one has a cold without fever; and I think it may with equal truth be asserted of the national world, no nations are vain without being afflicted with sensitiveness: at all events, it is true as regards the United States. No maiden in her teens is so ticklishly sensitive as the Americans. I do not refer merely to that portion of the community of which I have selected Mr. Douglas, of Illinois, as the type; I allude also to the far higher order of intelligence with which the Republic abounds. There is a touchiness about them all with respect to national and local questions which I never saw equalled: in fact, the few sheets of their Press which reach this country are alone sufficient to convince any one on that point; for in a free country the Press may always be fairly considered, to a certain extent, as the reflex of the public mind. I suppose it is with nations as with individuals, and that each are alike blind to their own failings. In no other way can I account for the Republic overlooking so entirely the sensitiveness of others. Take for instance the appointment of M. Soulé—a Frenchman naturalized in America—as minister to the court of Spain. I do not say that he was a Filibustero, but he was universally supposed to be identified with that party; and if he were not so identified, he showed a puerile ignorance of the requirements of a Minister, quite beyond conception, when he received a serenade of five thousand people at New York, who came in procession, bearing aloft the accompanying transparencies, he being at the time accredited to his new ministry.

In the medical world, it’s said that no one has a cold without a fever; and I think it can equally be said about nations that no country is arrogant without being overly sensitive. At least that’s true for the United States. No young woman in her teens is as hypersensitive as Americans. I’m not just talking about the part of the population represented by Mr. Douglas from Illinois; I’m also referring to the much broader intelligence that the Republic has. There’s a touchiness about them concerning national and local issues that I've never seen anywhere else. In fact, just reading a few newspapers from there is enough to demonstrate this; in a free country, the press can often be seen as a reflection of public opinion. I suppose it’s true for nations like it is for individuals, and that each is blind to its own flaws. The only explanation I have for the Republic completely ignoring the sensitivities of others is this. Take, for example, the appointment of M. Soulé—a Frenchman who became a naturalized American—as the minister to the court of Spain. I’m not saying he was a Filibustero, but he was generally believed to be associated with that group; and if he wasn’t, he displayed a childish ignorance of what a minister needs to understand when he received a serenade from five thousand people in New York, who paraded with banners while he was still accredited to his new role.

On the first transparency was the following motto:—

On the first slide was the following motto:—

A STAR. PIERCE.

SOULÉ. CUBA.

On the second banner:—

On the second banner:—

Young America and Young Cuba.
Free thought and free speech for the Cubans.

It's not just a fantasy, for __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__,
Cuba must be, and is
Destined by fate, an island
Awesome and free.

O pray, you doomed tyrants,
Your fate isn't far away:
A fearsome Order is now watching you,—
It's the Lone Star.

On the third banner:—

On the third banner:—

Cuba must and will be free.

The Caribbean Flower,
The real Key to the Gulf,
Must be picked from the Crown
Of the Old Spanish Wolf.

Monumental representation—a tomb and a weeping willow. On the tomb were the words—

Monumental representation—a tomb and a weeping willow. On the tomb were the words—

LOPEZ AND CRITTENDEN,

AGUERO AND ARMATERO.

They and their friends are not forgotten.

M. Soulé accepts the compliment, and makes a speech, in which he informs his audience that he cannot believe "that this mighty nation can be chained now within the narrow limits which fettered the young Republic of America," &c.

M. Soulé accepts the compliment and gives a speech where he tells his audience that he can't believe "that this great nation can be stuck now within the narrow limits that constrained the young Republic of America," &c.

Change the scene, and let any American judge in the following supposed and parallel case. Imagine expeditions fitted out in England, in spite of Government, to free the slaves in the Southern States; imagine a Lopez termination to the affair, and the rowdy blood of England forming other Filibustero expeditions; then imagine the Hon. Mr. Tenderheart identifying himself with them, and receiving an appointment as minister to Washington; after which, imagine him serenaded at St. James's by thousands of people bearing transparencies, the first representing a naked woman under the slave-driver's lash; the second, containing some such verses as "The Antilles Flower," &c.; for instance:—

Change the scene, and let any American judge in the following imagined and parallel case. Picture expeditions launched in England, despite the Government's opposition, to free the slaves in the Southern States; envision a Lopez-like ending to the situation, with the rebellious spirit of England sparking more Filibuster expeditions; then visualize the Hon. Mr. Tenderheart aligning himself with them and being appointed as minister to Washington; after which, picture him being celebrated at St. James's by thousands of people holding banners, the first showing a naked woman under the slave-driver's whip; the second containing verses like "The Antilles Flower," etc.; for example:—

"The slaves must be freed."
From the chains that now restrain them,
Though US wolves
"An inferior race calls them."

Let the minister accept the serenade, and address the multitude, declaring "that this mighty nation can no longer be chained down to passive interference," &c. Let me ask any American how the Hon. Mr. Tenderheart would be received at Washington, particularly if a few days after he took a shot at his French colleague because another person insulted him in that gentleman's house?—I ask, what would Americans say if such a line of conduct were to be pursued towards them? I might go further, and suppose that a conclave of English Ministers met at Quebec, and discussed the question as to how far the flourishing town of Buffalo, so close on the frontier, was calculated to endanger the peace and prosperity of Canada, and then imagine them winding up their report with this clause—If it be so—"then by every law, human and divine, we shall be justified in wresting it from its present owners." The American who penned that sentence must possess a copy of the Scriptures unknown to the rest of the world. Surely America must imagine she has the monopoly of all the sensitiveness in the world, or she would never have acted by Spain as she has done. How humiliated must she feel while contemplating the contrast between her act in appointing the minister, and Spain's demeanour in her silent and dignified reception of him!

Let the minister accept the serenade and speak to the crowd, saying "this great nation can no longer be held back by passive interference," etc. Let me ask any American how the Hon. Mr. Tenderheart would be received in Washington, especially if just a few days later he lashed out at his French colleague because someone else insulted him in that gentleman's house. What would Americans think if such behavior was directed at them? I could go further and imagine a meeting of English Ministers in Quebec discussing how the thriving town of Buffalo, so close to the border, could threaten the peace and prosperity of Canada, and then picture them concluding their report with this statement—If that’s the case—"then by every law, human and divine, we would be justified in taking it from its current owners." The American who wrote that must have a version of the Scriptures that no one else knows about. Surely, America must think it has a monopoly on sensitivity, or it wouldn’t have acted toward Spain the way it has. How humiliated must it feel when comparing its action in appointing the minister to Spain's response, which was silent and dignified!

This same sensitiveness peeps out in small things as well as great, especially where England is concerned: thus, one writer discovers that the Americans speak French better than the English; probably he infers it from having met a London Cit who had run over to Paris for a quiet Sunday, and who asked him "Moosyere, savvay voo oo ey lay Toolureeze?" Another discovers that American society is much more sought after than English; that Americans are more agreeable, more intelligent, more liberal, &c.; but the comparison is always with England or the English. And why all this? Simply because it feeds the morbid appetite of many Republican citizens, which the pure truth would not.

This same sensitivity shows up in both small and big things, especially when it comes to England. For instance, one writer finds that Americans speak French better than the English; he probably thinks this because he met a London guy who had gone to Paris for a quiet Sunday and asked him "Moosyere, savvay voo oo ey lay Toolureeze?" Another writer thinks American society is way more desirable than English society, claiming Americans are friendlier, smarter, more open-minded, etc.; but the comparisons are always with England or the English. And why is that? Simply because it feeds the unhealthy curiosity of many Republican citizens, which the plain truth does not.

This sensitiveness also shows itself in the way they watch the opinions of their country expressed by The Times, or by any largely circulating paper. I remember an American colonel who had been through the whole Mexican war, saying to me one day, "I assure you the Mexican troops are the most contemptible soldiers in the world; I would rather a thousand to one face them than half the number of Camanche Indians."—The object of this remark was to show on what slight and insufficient grounds The Timeshad spoken of the United States as a great military nation since the Mexican war. An article giving them due credit for a successful campaign was easily magnified beyond its intended proportions, and my gallant friend was modestly disclaiming so high-sounding an appellation; but such evidently was the construction which he felt his countrymen had put upon it.

This sensitivity also shows in how they pay attention to the opinions of their country expressed by The Times or any widely-read newspaper. I remember an American colonel who had gone through the entire Mexican war saying to me one day, "I assure you the Mexican troops are the most worthless soldiers in the world; I would rather face a thousand of them than half that number of Comanche Indians."—His point was to demonstrate how flimsy and inadequate the reasons were for The Times referring to the United States as a great military power since the Mexican war. An article that gave them credit for a successful campaign was easily blown out of proportion, and my brave friend was humbly rejecting such a grand title; but that was clearly how he felt his fellow countrymen had interpreted it.

I turn now for a few moments to the question of Morals; and here, again, it is of course only in a wholesale manner I can treat of the subject. As far as my inquiries enable me to judge, I find the same elements producing the same results here as in England. Wherever masses are clustered together most largely, there vice runs as rampant as in England; nay, I have the authority of a lecture delivered at the Maryland Institute, for saying that it is even worse in many places. After describing various instances of lawless conduct, the lecturer continues thus: "Such lawlessness as I have described is not tolerated in any other part of the world, and would not be tolerated here for a moment, but for the criminal apathy of our citizens generally, and the truckling, on the part of our politicians and public officers, for the votes of the very men whom they know to be violating and trampling on the laws."—In illustration, he states, "In every part of Europe in which I have travelled,—in England, Holland, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy; under all the different systems of religion and forms of government; in the large cities, and the small towns and villages; in the highways and byways,—I found better public order, more decorum, where bodies of men were assembled together, and less tendency to rowdyism, pugilism, and violence, than there is in most parts of this country. In this general statement of the fact, all unprejudiced travellers will, I suppose concur."—Further on, he draws a comparison favourable to London; and, with regard to the Police in our metropolis, he says, "A more respectable and finer-looking body of men it would be difficult to find in any country. A stranger may apply to one for information, with a certainty of receiving a polite and intelligent answer," &c.—I only quote the last paragraph, in case Mr. Matt. Ward should see these pages, and that he may know how the Police behave towards those who know how to conduct themselves.[CM]

I’ll now take a moment to discuss the topic of morals; and again, I can only address it in broad terms. From what my research allows me to see, I find that the same factors lead to similar outcomes here as they do in England. Wherever large groups are gathered, vice is just as prevalent as in England; in fact, I can say, based on a lecture given at the Maryland Institute, that it’s even worse in many areas. After detailing various examples of lawlessness, the speaker notes, "Such lawlessness as I've described is not tolerated anywhere else in the world, and wouldn't be tolerated here for a second, except for the general apathy of our citizens and the pandering of our politicians and public officials for the votes of those they know are breaking and disregarding the law." He illustrates this by stating, "In every part of Europe I've traveled—in England, Holland, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy; under various religions and forms of government; in large cities as well as small towns and villages; on the main roads and back streets—I found better public order and decorum where groups of people gathered, with less tendency toward rowdiness, fighting, and violence than there is in most areas of this country. I believe all unbiased travelers will agree with this general observation." Later, he makes a comparison that favors London; regarding the police in our capital, he says, "It would be hard to find a more respectable and well-groomed group of men in any country. A stranger can approach one for information, confident they will receive a courteous and informed response," etc. I include this last paragraph here in case Mr. Matt Ward happens to read this and so he understands how the police treat those who know how to behave.

The lecturer goes on to complain of the depravity of youth. He then attacks the dispensation of the law, pointing out many instances of their mal-administration. He then proceeds to attack the fire companies; he admits their courage and daring, but points out at the same time their lawlessness. He says—speaking of Philadelphia—"Almost every company has its war-song, breathing the most barbarous and bloodthirsty sentiments towards some rival association, and describing the glory of the fireman to the destruction of his enemy's apparatus, or worse yet, his life."—He gives the following list of the terrific names of the companies: "Hornets, Snappers, Blood-reds, Bed-bugs, Rock-boys, Buffaloes, Skimmers, Scrougers, Revengers, Knockers, Black-hawks, Pirate-boys, Kill-devils." After which he gives the following specimen, of their songs, written by a "Bluffer and Red-devil:"—

The lecturer continues to complain about the corruption of young people. He then criticizes how the law is enforced, highlighting several examples of its mismanagement. Next, he targets the fire companies; he acknowledges their bravery and boldness, but points out their lack of lawfulness as well. He remarks—referring to Philadelphia—"Almost every company has its battle song, expressing the most savage and violent sentiments towards some competing group, and celebrating the fireman’s glory in destroying his rival's gear, or even worse, his life." He then lists the terrifying names of the companies: "Hornets, Snappers, Blood-reds, Bed-bugs, Rock-boys, Buffaloes, Skimmers, Scrougers, Revengers, Knockers, Black-hawks, Pirate-boys, Kill-devils." Following that, he provides an example of their songs, written by a "Bluffer and Red-devil:"—

"Independent Hose Anthem."
"We're the cheeky Hyena-boys from George's Street, as everyone knows; We can"
whip the Penn and Globe, and also the Carroll Hose; We’ll take them down.
three together, the Bed-bugs and South Penn team up for convenience; We do
drive our carriage among our enemies, and take her wherever we want.
"Better keep quiet, Globe, if you know when you're in a good spot;"
If we take your engine again, we'll destroy it completely. Here is
Good luck to the Bluffers and all the honest guys with that name; cheers to the
"Hyenas and Red-devils, that no one can control."

He subsequently points out the evils of allowing political passions to guide citizens in the selection of officers, and declares, "that persons are elected to, and now fill, important offices in Baltimore, to whom no responsible trust in private life would be confided by the very men who voted for them."[CN] With regard to the actual commission of crime, and the due punishment of the offenders, he draws the following comparison between London and Baltimore: "The population of the former is 13 times greater than that of the latter; but the number of arrests is as 1 to 7,—in other words, the commission of crime, in proportion to numbers, was 46 per cent. greater than in London. Then, to show the inefficiency of the law, he proceeds to state, that the commitments for trial were only 29 per cent. greater, and that, even of those committed, many escaped just punishment. Of course, the large cities in America are the only places in which any comparison can be made with this country; but, while doing so, the tide of emigration, which helps to fill up their numbers, must not be lost sight of, or we should judge them unfairly.

He later highlights the dangers of letting political passions influence how citizens choose their leaders, stating, "people are elected to, and currently hold, important positions in Baltimore, that no responsible person in private life would trust to the very voters who chose them."[CN] Regarding actual crime and the appropriate punishment for offenders, he compares London and Baltimore: "The population of London is 13 times larger than that of Baltimore; yet the number of arrests is at a ratio of 1 to 7—in other words, the rate of crime, relative to the population, was 46 percent higher than in London. To illustrate the inefficiency of the law, he mentions that the number of commitments for trial was only 29 percent higher, and that even among those committed, many avoided proper punishment. Certainly, large cities in America are the only places where any meaningful comparison can be made with this country; however, while making these comparisons, we should not overlook the fact that the wave of immigration, which contributes to their populations, must be considered, or we risk an unfair judgment.

With regard to the masses that are spread over the length and breadth of the land, I certainly have never seen nor heard anything that need make England ashamed of the comparison. It would not be equitable to judge by mere numbers,—you must also bring into the balance the comparative state of affluence and independence of the respective parties; for who can doubt that distress is one of the great causes of crime? Even in the wealthy State of New York, I find an account of the following outrage, committed upon a Mr. Lawrence, when serving a summons upon his aggressor, Mr. Deitz: "He found Mr. Deitz near the house, and handed him the papers. Deitz took them and read them, when he threw them on the ground,—seized Lawrence by the throat, calling him a d----d scoundrel, for coming to serve papers on him. He then called to his family to blow a horn, when a man, named Hollenbeck, who was at work for Deitz as a mason, interceded for Lawrence, who managed to get away, and started off on a run. Deitz followed in pursuit, knocked Lawrence down, and held him until four men in disguise made their appearance. They then tied his hands behind him, and took him to a small piece of bush near by,—then tore off his coat, vest, and cravat, and with a jack-knife cut off his hair, occasionally cutting his scalp,—and, remarking that they had a plaster that would heal it up, they tarred his head and body, and poured tar into his boots. After exhausting all their ingenuity this way, each cut a stick, and whipped him until they got tired. They then tied his hands before him, and started him for the house, each of them kicking him at every step. They made him take the papers back, but took them away again;—when, after knocking him down again, they left him, and he succeeded in reaching the residence of George Beckers last evening. His legs, hands, arms, and face are badly bruised."—If we travel West and South, we shall doubtless find that morality is far more lax than in England; but what can you expect where gentlemen, even senators for States, go out to fight bloody duels with rifles at twenty paces, while crowds of spectators are looking on?

Regarding the people spread across the country, I honestly have never seen or heard anything that should make England feel embarrassed by the comparison. It wouldn’t be fair to judge solely by numbers—you also have to consider the relative wealth and independence of each group; after all, who can deny that hardship is one of the major causes of crime? Even in the affluent state of New York, there's a report of a shocking incident involving a Mr. Lawrence while he was serving a summons to his assailant, Mr. Deitz: "He found Mr. Deitz near the house and handed him the papers. Deitz took them, read them, then threw them on the ground—he grabbed Lawrence by the throat, calling him a d----d scoundrel for serving him papers. He then shouted to his family to blow a horn, and a man named Hollenbeck, who was working for Deitz as a mason, intervened for Lawrence, allowing him to escape and run away. Deitz chased after him, knocked Lawrence down, and held him until four disguised men showed up. They tied his hands behind his back and took him to a nearby patch of bushes, tore off his coat, vest, and cravat, and with a jackknife cut off his hair, sometimes cutting his scalp too. They remarked that they had a bandage that would fix it, then poured tar on his head and body and filled his boots with tar. After exhausting their creativity this way, each of them grabbed a stick and whipped him until they got tired. They then tied his hands in front of him and sent him back to the house, kicking him with every step. They made him return the papers, but took them away again; after knocking him down once more, they left him, and he managed to reach George Becker's house last night. His legs, hands, arms, and face are badly bruised."—If we travel West and South, we will likely find that morality is much more relaxed than in England; but what can you expect when gentlemen, even state senators, are out there engaged in bloody duels with rifles at twenty paces while crowds of spectators watch?

Where the Americans have the advantage over our population is, first and foremost, in possessing a boundless extent of territory which gives a rich return for comparatively little labour, and where, if labour is wanted, the scarcity of the article insures its commanding a high price. Compare England for one moment with two of the oldest American States, and therefore the most thickly populated:—

Where Americans have the upper hand over our population is primarily due to their vast territory, which yields great rewards for relatively little work. Additionally, when labor is needed, its scarcity ensures that it commands a high price. Take a moment to compare England with two of the oldest and therefore most densely populated American states:—

                                       Square Miles. Inhabitants.

    England      covers              50,000         17,923,000
    New York        "                  46,000          3,097,000
    Pennsylvania    "                  46,000          2,311,786

We here see, that if we take the most populous States in the Union, the proportion is nearly 6 to 1 in favour of America; but, if we mass the whole, we shall find—

We can see that if we take the most populous states in the Union, the ratio is almost 6 to 1 in favor of America; however, if we combine everything, we will find—

                                     Square Miles.  Inhabitants.

    Great Britain and Ireland cover     120,000      27,400,000
    United States                      3,500,000      23,192,000

This would bring the proportion of population to extent of territory, in rough numbers:—

This would relate the size of the population to the amount of land, in approximate figures:—

    Great Britain and Ireland  228 people per square mile.
    United States                7      "         "       "

In other words, Great Britain is 32 times as thickly populated as the Republic. If these facts are borne in mind, I confess that the commission of crime in Great Britain appears to me proportionally far smaller than in the States, notwithstanding all the advantages of the free and liberal education which is within their reach.

In other words, Great Britain has a population density that is 32 times higher than that of the Republic. Considering these facts, I must admit that the rate of crime in Great Britain seems much lower compared to the States, despite all the benefits of accessible and quality education available there.

I cannot but think that the general system of training youth in the Republic has a most prejudicial effect, in many instances, on their after-life. In their noble zeal for the education of the brain, they appear to me to lose sight almost entirely of the necessity of disciplining the mind to that obedience to authority, which lays the foundation of self-control and respect for the laws of the land. Nationally speaking, there is scarcely such a thing as a lad in the whole Union. A boy in the States hardly gets over the novelty of that portion of his dress which marks the difference of sex, ere his motto is: "I don't care; I shall do what I best please:" in short, he is made a man before he ceases to be a boy; he consequently becomes unable to exercise that restraint which better discipline might have taught him, and the acts of his after-life are thus more likely to be influenced by passion and self-will than by reason or reflection. I find in the lecture from which I have already quoted, the following paragraph, which, as I consider it illustrative of my last observation, I insert at length.

I can't help but think that the overall way we train young people in the Republic often has a harmful effect on their future lives. In their strong dedication to educating the mind, it seems they almost completely overlook the need to teach the importance of obeying authority, which lays the groundwork for self-control and respect for the laws of the land. Nationally speaking, there’s hardly such a thing as a boy in the whole country. A boy in the States barely gets used to the novelty of the part of his outfit that shows the difference between genders before his motto becomes: "I don't care; I’m going to do what I want." In short, he becomes an adult before he's even finished being a boy; as a result, he becomes unable to exercise the self-restraint that better training could have taught him, and his actions later in life are therefore more likely to be driven by passion and self-will rather than by reason or thoughtful reflection. I found a paragraph in the lecture that I’ve already quoted, which I think illustrates my last point, so I’m including it in full.

"But the most concerning aspect of the situation, not just in
the city, as well as in other parts of the country, is the lawlessness of
the youth. The most notable example of this that I've seen is
taken from a Cincinnati newspaper from last January. It appears that in the
Over the course of a few days, one hundred applications had been submitted by parents.
in that city to have their kids sent to the House of Refuge.
The details of one case, which took place not long ago, are
A twelve-year-old boy was brought before the Mayor's
Court by his father, who said that the family was truly afraid
the young people would take their lives, and that he bought a pistol
to shoot the housekeeper. A double-barreled pistol
was presented in court, which the police officer had taken from the
The boy claimed he bought it for the stated purpose. The
The mayor sent the boy to the House of Refuge.

I now pass on to the question of Liberty in the United States. If by liberty be understood the will of the greater number ruling the State or regulating its laws, certainly they have more liberty than England; but if by liberty be understood that balance of power and adaptation of the laws to the various interests of the whole community, combined with the due execution, of them against offenders of whatever class, then I consider that there is unquestionably more liberty in England, in spite of the restrictions by which the franchise is limited—nay, rather I should say, in consequence of those very restrictions; for I believe they tend to secure the services of more liberal, high-minded, and independent representatives than any country—however highly educated its population may be—would return under a system of universal suffrage. I do not intend to convey in the foregoing observation, any opinion as to how far it is desirable, or otherwise, to modify the restrictions at present existing in England; it is obvious they should keep pace with the growing intelligence of the community, inasmuch as, if they do not, popular agitation is readily excited, and violent changes are forced by ignorant passion, going far beyond those which educated prudence and a sense of justice ought to have brought forward.—Prevention is better than cure.

I now move on to the topic of Liberty in the United States. If liberty means the will of the majority governing the State or shaping its laws, then they certainly have more liberty than England. However, if liberty refers to a balance of power and the alignment of laws with the diverse interests of the entire community, along with their fair enforcement against offenders of any class, then I believe there is undoubtedly more liberty in England, despite the restrictions limiting the franchise—rather, I would say, because of those very restrictions; because I think they help ensure the election of more liberal, principled, and independent representatives than any country—regardless of how educated its population may be—would elect under a system of universal suffrage. I do not mean to express a view on whether it is desirable to change the existing restrictions in England; it is clear they should evolve alongside the increasing intelligence of the community, as failing to do so can lead to popular unrest and drastic changes driven by uninformed passion, far exceeding what educated judgment and a sense of justice should have prompted.—Prevention is better than cure.

Mr. Everett, in a letter dated July 25, 1853, after observing that it has long been the boast of England that she is the great city of refuge for the rest of Europe, adds, "it is the prouder boast of the United States, that they are, and ever have been, an asylum for the rest of the world, including Great Britain herself:" he then goes on to say, "no citizen has ever been driven into banishment."—This is bravely said by an able son of the "Land of Liberty;" but when he penned it, he appears to have forgotten that there are upwards of three millions of his own fellow-creatures held in the galling shackles of hopeless slavery by the citizens of that land of which he makes so proud a boast; and that from one to two thousand of the wretched victims escape annually to the British colony adjoining, which is their sole city of refuge on the whole North American continent. Doubtless Mr. Everett's countrymen do not sufficiently know this startling point of difference, or they would hesitate in accepting such a boast. So ignorant are some of his countrymen of the real truth as regards the citizens of Great Britain, that a friend of mine was asked by a well-educated and otherwise intelligent son of the Republic, "Is it really true that all the land in England belongs to the Queen?"

Mr. Everett, in a letter dated July 25, 1853, notes that it has long been a point of pride for England to be seen as the great city of refuge for the rest of Europe. He adds, "it is an even prouder boast of the United States that they are, and always have been, an asylum for the rest of the world, including Great Britain itself." He then states, "no citizen has ever been driven into banishment." This is a bold claim from a capable son of the "Land of Liberty," but when he wrote it, he seems to have overlooked the fact that over three million of his fellow beings are held in the crushing chains of hopeless slavery by the citizens of that land he boasts about. Additionally, one to two thousand of these miserable victims escape each year to the nearby British colony, which is their only city of refuge on the entire North American continent. Clearly, Mr. Everett's countrymen do not fully understand this shocking difference; otherwise, they would think twice before accepting such a boast. So unaware are some of his fellow citizens about the real situation regarding the citizens of Great Britain that a friend of mine was asked by a well-educated and otherwise intelligent American, "Is it really true that all the land in England belongs to the Queen?"

While on the subject of liberty, it is well to observe one or two curious ways in which it may be said to be controlled in America. If any gentleman wished to set up a marked livery for his servants, he could not do so without being the subject of animadversions in the rowdy Press, styling him a would-be aristocrat. But perhaps the most extraordinary vagary is the Yankee notion that service is degrading; the consequence of which is that you very rarely see a Yankee servant; and if by chance you find one on a farm, he insists on living and eating with the overseer. So jealous are they of the appearance of service, that on many of the railways there was considerable difficulty in getting the guard, or conductor, to wear a riband on his hat designating his office, and none of the people attached to the railway station will put on any livery or uniform by which they can be known. I wonder if it ever occurs to these sons of the Republic, that in thus acting they are striking at the very root of their vaunted equal rights of man, and spreading a broader base of aristocracy than even the Old World can produce. Servants, of course, there must be in every community, and it is ridiculous to suppose that American gentlemen ever did, or ever will, live with their housemaids, cooks, and button-boys; and if this be so, and that Americans consider such service as degrading, is it not perfectly clear that the sons of the soil set themselves up as nobles, and look upon the emigrants—on whom the duties of service chiefly devolve—in the light of serfs?

While on the topic of freedom, it's worth noting a couple of interesting ways it's controlled in America. If any man wanted to create a specific uniform for his workers, he couldn’t do so without facing criticism from the loud Press, labeling him a wannabe aristocrat. But maybe the strangest idea is the American belief that being in service is degrading; as a result, you almost never see an American servant, and if you happen to find one on a farm, they insist on living and eating with the overseer. They are so protective of the appearance of service that on many railways, it was quite hard to get the conductor to wear a badge on his hat identifying his role, and no one at the train station will wear any uniform that shows they work there. I wonder if it ever crosses the minds of these sons of the Republic that by acting this way, they are undermining the very foundation of their celebrated equal rights and creating a deeper form of aristocracy than even the Old World can offer. There must be servants in every community, and it’s absurd to think that American gentlemen ever did or will live with their maids, cooks, and errand boys; and if this is the case, and Americans find such service degrading, isn’t it clear that the locals set themselves up as nobles and view the immigrants—who mainly take on service roles—as serfs?

I may, while discussing service, as well touch upon the subject of strikes. The Press in America is very ready to pass strictures on the low rate of wages in this country, such as the three-ha'penny shirt-makers, and a host of other ill-paid and hard-worked poor. Every humane man must regret to see the pressure of competition producing such disgraceful results; but my American friends, if they look carefully into their own country, will see that they act in precisely the same way, as far as they are able; in short, that they get labour as cheap as they can. Fortunately for the poor emigrant, the want of hands is so great, that they can insure a decent remuneration for their work; but the proof that the Anglo-Saxon in America is no better than the rest of the world in this respect, is to be found in the fact that strikes for higher wages also take place among them. I remember once reading in the same paper of the strike of three different interests; one of which was that indispensable body, the hotel-waiters. The negroes even joined with the whites, and they gained their point; they knew the true theory of strikes, and made their move "when the market was rising." The hotels were increasing their charges, and they merely wanted their share of the prosperity.

I might also touch on the topic of strikes while discussing service. The media in America is quick to criticize the low wages in this country, like the three-penny shirt makers and many other poorly paid, hard-working individuals. Every compassionate person should feel sorry seeing the competitive pressure lead to such shameful outcomes. However, my American friends, if you closely examine your own country, you'll find that you act in exactly the same way, as much as you can; in short, you try to get labor as cheaply as possible. Fortunately for the poor immigrant, the demand for workers is so high that they can secure fair pay for their labor. But the fact that Anglo-Saxons in America are no better than the rest of the world in this aspect is evident in the strikes for higher wages that also happen among them. I recall reading in the same newspaper about the strike of three different groups, one of which included the essential hotel waiters. Even African Americans joined forces with whites, and they achieved their goal; they understood the true concept of strikes and made their move "when the market was rising." The hotels were increasing their rates, and they just wanted their share of the prosperity.

I now propose to consider one of the brightest features in the national character—Intelligence. Irresistible testimony is borne to their appreciation of the value of education, not merely by the multitudes of schools of all kinds, and by the numbers that attend them, but also by that arrangement of which they may be so justly proud, and which opens the door to every branch of study to their poorest citizens free of expense. No praise is too high for such a noble national institution as the school system of the Republic. How far it may be advisable to bring all the various classes of the community together at that early age when habits which affect after-life are so readily acquired, is another question. Though the roughness of the many may derive advantage from contact with the polish of the few, it appears to me more than probable that the polish of the few will be influenced far more considerably by the roughness of the many. I cannot, therefore, but imagine that the universal admixture of all classes of society in early infancy must operate prejudicially to that advancement in the refinements of civilization which tends to give a superior tone to the society of every country. It must not, however, be imagined that the intelligence obtained at these schools is confined to those subjects which are requisite for making dollars and cents. People of this country, judging of the Republicans by the general accounts given of them through the Press, can have little idea of the extent to which the old standard works of the mother-country are read; but there is an intelligent portion of our own nation to be found among the booksellers, who can enlighten them on this point. I have been told by several of them, not only that old editions of our best authors are rapidly being bought up by citizens of the United States, but that in making their purchases they exhibit an intimate acquaintance with them far greater than they find generally among Englishmen, and which proves how thoroughly they are appreciated by them.

I now want to focus on one of the most impressive aspects of the national character—Intelligence. There's undeniable evidence of their recognition of the value of education, not just through the numerous schools of all types and the many people who attend them, but also through a system that they rightfully take pride in, which offers access to every field of study to their poorest citizens at no cost. There's no praise too great for such an admirable national institution as the school system of the Republic. Whether it’s wise to bring all the different classes of the community together at that young age, when habits that affect later life are easily formed, is another matter. While the roughness of the many might benefit from interacting with the polish of the few, it seems to me that the polish of the few would likely be more significantly affected by the roughness of the many. Therefore, I can't help but think that mixing all classes of society in early childhood could hinder progress in the refinements of civilization that elevate the society of every country. However, it shouldn't be assumed that the intelligence gained at these schools is limited to subjects necessary for making money. People in this country, judging Republicans by what they read in the news, might have little idea of how widely the classic works from the mother-country are read; but there’s an informed segment of our own nation among the booksellers who can shed light on this. Several of them have told me that not only are old editions of our best authors being snapped up by citizens of the United States, but when making their purchases, they show a familiarity with these works that far exceeds what they usually find among English people, proving just how much these works are valued by them.

Then again, with reference to their own country; it is impossible for any one to travel among them without being struck with the universal intelligence they possess as to its constitution, its politics, its laws, and all general subjects connected with its prosperity or its requirements; and if they do not always convey their information in the most classical language, at all events they convey it in clear and unmistakeable terms. The Constitution of their country is regularly taught at their schools; and doubtless it is owing to this early insight into the latent springs by which the machinery of Government is worked, that their future appetite for more minute details becomes whetted. I question very much if every boy, on leaving a high school in the United States, does not know far more of the institutions of his country than nine-tenths of the members of the British House of Commons do of theirs. At the same time it should not be forgotten, that the complications which have grown up with a nationality of centuries render the study far more difficult in this country, than it possibly can, be in the giant Republic of yesterday. And in the same way taxation in England, of which 30,000,000l. is due as interest on debt before the State receives one farthing for its disbursements, is one of the most intricate questions to be understood even by enlarged minds; whereas in the United States, scarcely any taxation exists, and the little that does, creates a surplus revenue which they often appear at a loss to know how to get rid of.

Then again, regarding their own country, it's impossible for anyone to travel among them without being impressed by the widespread knowledge they have about its constitution, politics, laws, and all general topics related to its success or needs. While they might not always express their ideas in the most formal language, they certainly communicate them in clear and unmistakable ways. The Constitution of their country is consistently taught in schools, and this early understanding of the underlying principles driving the machinery of government likely sharpens their future desire for more detailed information. I really doubt that every boy graduating from a high school in the United States doesn't know far more about his country's institutions than about ninety percent of the members of the British House of Commons know about theirs. At the same time, we should remember that the complexities developed over centuries of nationality make the study much more challenging in this country than it can be in the relatively new giant Republic. Similarly, taxation in England, of which £30,000,000 is owed just as interest on debt before the State receives a single penny for its expenses, is one of the most complex issues to understand, even for knowledgeable people. In contrast, in the United States, there’s hardly any taxation, and the little that exists often leads to a surplus revenue that they seem unsure how to manage.

Doubtless, the intelligence of the community sometimes exhibits itself in a 'cuteness which I am not prepared to defend. A clear apprehension of their immediate material interests has produced repudiation of legitimate obligations; but those days are, nationally speaking, I hope, gone by, and many of their merchants stand as high in the estimation of the commercial world as it is possible to desire. At the same time, it is equally true that the spirit of commercial gambling has risen to a point in the States far above what it ever has in this country,—except, perhaps, during the Railway epidemic; and the number of failures is lamentably great.

Surely, the intelligence of the community sometimes shows a level of 'cuteness' that I can't defend. A clear understanding of their immediate material interests has led to a rejection of legitimate obligations; but I hope those days are behind us nationally, and many of their merchants are regarded as highly in the commercial world as one could wish. At the same time, it's also true that the spirit of commercial gambling has surged in the States to a level far beyond what we've seen here—except, perhaps, during the Railway boom; and the number of failures is alarmingly high.

With their intelligence they combine an enterprise that knows no national parallel. This quality, aided by their law of limited liability, has doubtless tended to urge forward many works and schemes from which the Union is deriving, and has derived, great wealth and advantage; at the same time it has opened the door for the unscrupulous and the shrewd to come in and play high stakes with small capital—in playing which reckless game, while some become millionaires others become bankrupts. This latter state is a matter of comparative unimportance in a country like the Republic, where the field is so great, and a livelihood easily attainable until some opening occurs, when they are as ready to rush into it again as if they had been foaled at Niagara, and had sucked in the impetuosity of its cataract.

With their intelligence, they create a business that has no national equivalent. This trait, supported by their law of limited liability, has certainly helped push forward many projects and initiatives from which the Union is gaining, and has gained, significant wealth and benefits. At the same time, it has allowed the unscrupulous and the cunning to enter and take big risks with little capital—while some become millionaires, others end up bankrupt. This latter situation is relatively unimportant in a country like the Republic, where opportunities are abundant, and making a living is easy until new chances arise. When that happens, they're just as eager to dive back in as if they were born by Niagara and had absorbed the force of its waterfall.

There is one shape that their enterprise takes which it would indeed be well for us to imitate, and that is early rising. I quite blush for my country when I think what a "Castle of Indolence" we are in that respect, especially those who have not the slightest excuse for it. On what principle the classes of society in England who are masters of their own time, turn night into day, waste millions yearly in oil and wax, and sleep away the most fresh and healthy hours of the morning, for no other visible purpose but to enable themselves to pass the night in the most stuffy and unhealthy atmosphere, is beyond my comprehension. One thing is certain: it has a tendency to enervate both body and mind, and were it not for the revivifying effects produced by a winter residence in the country, where gentlemen take to field sports, and ladies to razeed dresses, sensible shoes, and constitutional walks, the mortality among our "upper ten thousand" would, I believe, be frightful. In America, the "boys" get up so early, that it is said they frequently "catch the birds by their tails as they are going to roost;" and it is no doubt owing to this that they are so 'cute. Talk about "catching a weasel asleep," let me see any of my metropolitan drone friends who can catch a Yankee boy asleep!

There’s one habit that their way of life has which we should really try to copy, and that’s getting up early. I feel embarrassed for my country when I think about how much of a “Castle of Indolence” we are in that regard, especially those who have no real excuse for it. I can’t understand why certain social classes in England, who control their own schedules, turn night into day, waste millions each year on oil and wax, and sleep through the freshest, healthiest hours of the morning, just to spend the night in stuffy, unhealthy conditions. One thing is clear: this habit weakens both body and mind, and if it weren’t for the refreshing effects of spending winter in the countryside, where men engage in outdoor sports and women wear sensible shoes for walks, the death rate among our “upper ten thousand” would be alarming. In America, the “boys” get up so early that it’s said they often “catch the birds by their tails as they’re going to roost,” and it’s probably why they’re so sharp. Forget about “catching a weasel asleep”—let's see any of my city friends catch a Yankee boy asleep!

It is not, however, merely to early rising that they owe their 'cuteness. A total absence of idleness, and the fact of being constantly thrown on their own resources in cases of minor difficulty, aid materially in sharpening their wits. You may see these latter influences operating in the difference between soldiers and sailors, when placed in situations where they have to shift for themselves. Some of their anecdotes bearing upon 'cuteness are amusing enough. I will give one as an illustration.—Owing to some unknown cause, there was a great dearth of eggs in one of the New England States, and they consequently rose considerably in price. It immediately occurred to a farmer's wife, that, if she could in any way increase the produce of her hens, it would be a source of great gain to her; she accordingly fitted the bottom of each laying hen's bed with a spring, and fixed a basin underneath, capable of holding two eggs. In due time, the hens laid; but as each hen, after laying, missed the warmth of the precious deposit, she got up to look if it was all right. To her astonishment, no egg was to be seen. "Bless my soul!" says the hen, "well, I declare I thought I had laid an egg. I suppose I must be mistaken;" and down she went to fulfil her duties again. Once more she rose to verify her success. No egg was there. "Well, I vow," quoth Mrs. Hen, "they must be playing me some trick: I'll have one more shot, and, if I don't succeed, I shall give it up." Again she returned to her labours, and the two eggs that had passed into the basin below supporting the base of her bed, success crowned her efforts, and she exclaimed, "Well, I have done it this time at all events!" The 'cute wife kept her counsel, and said nothing, either to the hens or to her neighbours, and thus realized a comfortable little bag of dollars.—I give the anecdote as narrated to me, and I must confess I never saw the operation, or heard the remarks of the outwitted hens. I insert it lest in these days of agricultural distress (?) any farmer's wife be disposed to make a trial of a similar experiment.[CO]

It isn't just their early rising that makes them clever. The complete lack of idleness and the fact that they are constantly faced with minor challenges help sharpen their minds. You can see these influences in the differences between soldiers and sailors when they need to fend for themselves. Some stories about their cleverness are quite amusing. Here's one as an example. Due to some unknown reason, there was a severe shortage of eggs in one of the New England States, and prices went up significantly. A farmer’s wife thought that if she could somehow increase her hens' egg production, it could be very profitable for her. So, she put a spring at the bottom of each hen's nesting box and placed a basin underneath that could hold two eggs. Eventually, the hens laid their eggs; however, each hen, after laying, missed the warmth of her precious egg, so she got up to check. To her surprise, there was no egg in sight. "Goodness!" said the hen, "I really thought I laid an egg. I guess I must be mistaken;" and she went back to laying again. She got up again to confirm her laying success. No egg was there. "Well, I’ll be," said Mrs. Hen, "someone must be tricking me: I'll try one more time, and if I don’t succeed, I’ll give up." Once again, she returned to her tasks, and this time, the two eggs that had dropped into the basin supported by her nesting box proved her right, leading her to exclaim, "Well, I did it this time for sure!" The clever wife kept this to herself and said nothing to the hens or her neighbors, thus making a nice little sum of money. I share this anecdote as it was told to me, and I must admit I never witnessed the hens' reactions. I include it here in case any farmer's wife in these times of agricultural struggle might be tempted to try a similar experiment.[CO]

I proceed to consider the energy of the Republicans, a quality in which they may challenge comparison with the world. No enterprise is too great for them to undertake, and no hardship too severe for them to endure. A Yankee will start off with his household gods, and seek a new home in the wilderness, with less fuss than a Cockney would make about packing up a basket of grub to go and pic-nic in Richmond Park. It is the spirit of adventure that has enabled them to cover a whole continent in the incredible manner which the map of the United States shows. The great drawback to this phase of their energy is the total absence it exhibits of those ties of home to which we so fondly cling in the old country. If we were a nation of Yankees, I feel persuaded that in five years we should not have ten millions of inhabitants. No Yankee can exist without elbow-room, except it be the more degraded and rowdy portion of the community, who find a more congenial atmosphere in those sinks of vice inseparable from large towns. This migratory spirit has caused them to exhibit their energy and enterprise in those countless miles of rail and telegraph, which bring the citizens of the most distant States into easy communication with Washington and the Eastern cities. The difficulty of procuring labour is no doubt one cause of the very inefficient way in which many of these works are performed; and it also disables them for executing gigantic works with the speed and certainty that such operations are completed in England. The miniature Crystal Palace at New York afforded a convincing proof of what I have stated; for although it was little more than a quarter of the size of the one in Hyde Park, they were utterly foiled in their endeavours to prepare it in time. In revenge for that failure, the Press tried to console the natives by enlarging on the superior attraction of hippodromes, ice-saloons, and penny shows, with which it was surrounded, and contrasting them with the "gloomy grandeur" of the palace in London. Gloomy grandeur is, I suppose, the Yankee way of expressing the finest park in any city in the world.

I want to discuss the energy of the Republicans, a quality that allows them to compete globally. No project is too ambitious for them to take on, and no challenge is too tough for them to handle. A Yankee will pack up their home and look for a new place in the wilderness without the fuss a Londoner would make just to gather a picnic for Richmond Park. It’s their adventurous spirit that has let them span an entire continent in the astonishing way the map of the United States shows. The major downside to this energy is the complete lack of the home ties we cherish so much in the old country. If we were all Yankees, I’m convinced that in five years, we wouldn’t have more than ten million people. No Yankee can thrive without space, except for the more dysfunctional and rowdy parts of society who feel more at home in the vice-ridden areas of big cities. This nomadic spirit drives them to showcase their energy and initiative in the countless miles of railroads and telegraphs that connect citizens from the furthest States to Washington and the Eastern cities. The challenge of finding labor is certainly one reason why many of these projects are carried out so poorly, and it also prevents them from completing massive works with the same speed and reliability as in England. The small Crystal Palace in New York provided clear evidence of what I’m saying; even though it was just a quarter the size of the one in Hyde Park, they completely failed to get it ready on time. In retaliation for that setback, the Press tried to cheer up the locals by highlighting the more exciting attractions of hippodromes, ice rinks, and penny shows nearby, contrasting them with the "gloomy grandeur" of the palace in London. Gloomy grandeur is, I guess, how Yankees describe the best park in any city worldwide.

Among other remarks on Americans, I have heard many of my countrymen say, "Look how they run after lords!"—It is quite true; a live lord is a comparative novelty, and they run after him in the same way as people in England run after an Indian prince, or any pretentious Oriental: it is an Anglo-Saxon mania. Not very long ago, a friend of mine found a Syrian swaggering about town, fêted everywhere, as though he were the greatest man of the day; and who should the Syrian nabob turn out to be, but a man he had employed as a servant in the East, and whom he had been obliged to get bastinadoed for petty theft. In England we run after we know not whom; in America, if a lord be run after, there is at all events a strong presumption in favour of his being at least a gentleman. We toady our Indian swells, and they toady their English swells; and I trust, for our sake, that in so doing they have a decided advantage over us.

Among other comments about Americans, I’ve heard a lot of my fellow countrymen say, "Look how they chase after lords!"—That’s quite true; a living lord is somewhat of a novelty, and they pursue him just like people in England chase after an Indian prince or any showy Oriental: it’s an Anglo-Saxon obsession. Not too long ago, a friend of mine spotted a Syrian strutting around town, fêted everywhere, as if he were the greatest person of the moment; and who did the Syrian big shot turn out to be, but a guy he had worked as a servant in the East, whom he had to have whipped for minor theft. In England, we chase after people we don’t even know; in America, if a lord is pursued, there’s at least a strong likelihood that he’s a gentleman. We flatter our Indian elites, and they flatter their English elites; and I hope, for our sake, that in doing so, they have a clear advantage over us.

I have also heard some of my countrymen observe, as to their hospitality, "Oh! it's very well; but if you went there as often as I do, you would see how soon their hospitality wears off." Who on earth ever heard such an unreasonable remark! Because a man, in the fulness of hospitality, dedicates his time, his money, and his convenience to welcome a stranger, of whose character and of whose sociability he knows nothing whatever, is he therefore bound to be saddled with that acquaintance as often as the traveller chooses to visit the American Continent? Is not the very idea preposterous? No man in the world is more ready to welcome the stranger than the American; but if the stranger revisit the same places, the courtesy and hospitality he receives must, in justice, depend upon the impression which his company has left on those upon whom he inflicted it. No doubt the scanty number of travellers enables Americans to exercise more universal hospitality than they could do if the country were filled with strangers in the same way as Great Britain is. The increased travelling of late years has necessarily made a marked difference on that point among ourselves, and doubtless it may hereafter act upon the United States; but the man who does not admit hospitality to be a most distinctive feature of the Republic, at the present time, must indeed be rotten in the brain or the heart.

I’ve also heard some of my fellow countrymen say about their hospitality, “Oh! it’s nice, but if you went there as often as I do, you’d see how quickly their hospitality fades.” Who on earth ever heard such an unreasonable comment! Just because someone, in the spirit of hospitality, dedicates their time, money, and convenience to welcome a stranger whose character and sociability they know nothing about, does that mean they are obligated to keep that acquaintance as often as the traveler wants to visit America? Isn’t that idea ridiculous? No one is more eager to welcome strangers than Americans; however, if a stranger keeps returning to the same places, the courtesy and hospitality they receive should, fairly, depend on the impression they've left on those they've visited. It’s true that the small number of travelers allows Americans to offer more widespread hospitality than they could if the country were crowded with strangers like Great Britain is. The increase in travel over the past few years has definitely made a noticeable difference in that regard for us, and it will likely have an impact on the United States in the future; but anyone who doesn’t recognize hospitality as a defining characteristic of the Republic today must really be out of touch.

With regard to the political character of the Union, it is very much in the same state as that of England. The two original parties were Whig and Democrat, the former being synonymous with the Tory party in this country—i.e., an honest body of men, who, in their earnest endeavours to keep the coach straight, put the drag on so often that the horses get restive sometimes, and start off at score when they feel the wheel clogged. The Democrats are more nearly represented by a compound of Whig and Radical—i.e., a body of men who, in their energetic exertions to make the coach go, don't trouble themselves much about the road, and look upon the drag as a piece of antiquated humbug. Sometimes this carelessness also leads to the team-bolting; but in the States there is so much open country that they may run away for miles without an upset; whereas in England, when this difficulty occurs, the ribands are generally handed over to the Jarvey of the opposite party. This old state of affairs is entirely changed in both hemispheres; each party is more or less broken up, and in neither country is there at present any distinct body sufficiently numerous to form a strong government.

Regarding the political nature of the Union, it’s pretty similar to that of England. The two original parties were the Whigs and the Democrats, with the former being akin to the Tory party here—i.e., a sincere group of people who, in their genuine efforts to keep things on track, apply the brakes so often that the horses sometimes get restless and take off when they feel the wheels are stuck. The Democrats are more like a mix of Whig and Radical—i.e., a group that, in their vigorous attempts to move forward, don’t really care much about the path and see the brakes as outdated nonsense. Sometimes this recklessness also leads to the team bolting; but in the States, there's so much open land that they can run wild for miles without tipping over; while in England, when this happens, the reins are usually handed over to the driver from the opposing party. This old scenario has completely changed in both hemispheres; each party is somewhat fractured, and there isn’t currently any distinct group large enough to form a strong government in either country.

In consequence of these disruptions, it may be imagined how difficult it would be to give any accurate description of the different pieces of crockery that constitute the political "service." Formerly, the two cries of "Protection to Home Manufacture" and "Free Trade" were the distinct rallying points. At present there are Slaveholders, Slavery Extension, Free-soil, Abolitionist, Annexationist, and Heaven alone knows how many more parties, on the question of Slavery alone, into which the Democratic or dominant party is divided, independent of those other general political divisions which must necessarily exist in so large and varied a community. From the foregoing you will observe that, to say a man is a Democrat conveys no distinct idea of his politics except that he is not a Whig; and the Whigs also have their divisions on the Slave question.

Due to these disruptions, it's easy to see how challenging it would be to accurately describe the various pieces of crockery that make up the political "service." In the past, the two main chants were "Protection for Home Manufacturing" and "Free Trade." Today, there are Slaveholders, those advocating for Slavery Extension, Free-soil supporters, Abolitionists, Annexationists, and who knows how many more factions just on the issue of Slavery alone, which has caused the Democratic or ruling party to split. This is aside from the other general political divisions that are bound to exist in such a large and diverse community. From this, you can tell that saying someone is a Democrat doesn't clearly convey their political views, other than that they aren't a Whig; and the Whigs also have their own divisions on the Slavery issue.

But there is a party lately come into the field, and called the Know-nothings, which requires a special notice. Their ostensible principles have been published in the leading journals of this country, and carry a certain degree of reason upon the face of them, the leading features being that they are a secret society banded together for the purpose of opposing the priestly influence of the Humanists in political matters: for prolonging the period requisite to obtain the rights of citizenship; and for the support of the native-born American in opposition to all other candidates for any public situation that may be contested. Such is the substance of their manifesto. Their opponents say that they are sheer humbugs, and brought into life by a few old political hacks for their own selfish ends. Owing to the factions in the old Whig and Democratic parties, their opponents believe they may succeed for a year or two, but they prophesy their speedy and total disruption. Time will show—I am no prophet. There is one point in their charter, however, that I cannot believe will ever succeed—viz., naturalization or citizenship. Congress would be loth to pass any law that might tend to turn the stream of emigration into another channel, such as Australia or Canada; and individual States would be equally loth to pass such a local law for the same reason, inasmuch as if they did, the emigrants would move on to those States where they obtained most speedily the rights of citizens. The crusade against the Romanists is also so opposed to the spirit of a constitution which professes the principle of the equal rights of man, that it is more than probable they may ere long divide upon the unsolvable question of how to draw the line of demarcation between the influence of the priest and the opinion of his flock. As far, therefore, as I am capable of judging, I do not believe they have a sufficiently broad and distinct basis to stand upon, and I think also that the fact of their being a secret society will rather hasten their end than otherwise.

But there's a new group that has emerged recently, called the Know-nothings, which deserves special mention. Their apparent principles have been published in major news outlets across the country and seem to have some reasonable grounds. The main features include being a secret society united to oppose the priestly influence of Humanists in politics, extending the time required to gain citizenship rights, and supporting native-born Americans against all other candidates for any public positions. This is the essence of their manifesto. Their critics argue that they are just a bunch of frauds brought to life by a few old political insiders for their own gain. Due to the divisions in the old Whig and Democratic parties, their opponents think they might succeed for a year or two, but they predict a quick and total downfall. Time will tell—I’m no prophet. However, there's one point in their charter that I seriously doubt will ever work—namely, the ideas around naturalization or citizenship. Congress would be reluctant to pass any law that might redirect immigration flows to other places like Australia or Canada, and individual states would feel the same way for the same reason, since if they did, immigrants would just move to the states where they could quickly gain citizenship rights. The campaign against Roman Catholics also clashes with the spirit of a constitution that claims to uphold the principle of equal rights for all, making it likely they will soon split over the difficult issue of how to distinguish between a priest's influence and the opinions of his congregation. Therefore, as far as I can judge, I don’t think they have a solid and clear foundation to stand on, and I also believe that their status as a secret society will actually speed up their downfall rather than prolong it.

The last point I shall allude to is the future prospects of the Republic; a question which doubtless is veiled in much obscurity. The black cloud of the South hangs perpetually over their heads, ever from time to time threatening to burst upon them. In the Free States many feel strongly the degradation of being forced to aid in the capture of the fugitive slave; and the aversion to the repulsive task is increasing rather than decreasing. The citizens have on many occasions risen in masses against those who were executing the law, and the military have been brought into collision with them in defending the authorities. The dread of breaking up the Union alone prevents that clause being struck out from the Constitution, by which they are compelled not merely to restore but to hunt up the fugitive. The "Freesoilers" also feel indignant at seeing their nation turning virgin soil into a land of Slavery; the Nebraska Bill has strengthened that feeling considerably. The Abolitionists are subject to constant fits of rabidity which increase intensity with each successive attack. Thousands and thousands of Northerns, who writhe under the feeling that their star-spangled banner is crossed with the stripes of the slave, turn back to the history of their country, and recalling to mind the glorious deeds that their ancestors have accomplished under that flag, their hearts respond—"The Union for ever!"

The last point I want to mention is the future of the Republic; a question that is definitely shrouded in a lot of uncertainty. The dark cloud of the South constantly looms over them, always threatening to explode at any moment. In the Free States, many people feel strongly about the humiliation of being forced to help capture runaway slaves; their dislike for this unpleasant task is growing rather than shrinking. Citizens have frequently united against those enforcing the law, and the military has clashed with them while trying to protect the authorities. The fear of breaking up the Union is all that stops this clause from being removed from the Constitution, which forces them not just to return but to actively hunt down fugitives. The "Freesoilers" are also outraged at watching their country turn once free land into a territory of slavery; the Nebraska Bill has significantly intensified that sentiment. The Abolitionists experience constant bursts of anger that grow stronger with each new attack. Thousands of Northerners, who resent the thought that their star-spangled banner is tainted by the stripes of slavery, look back at their country’s history, remembering the amazing things their ancestors achieved under that flag, and their hearts respond—"The Union forever!"

But perhaps the strongest feeling in the Republic which tends to keep things quiet, is that the intelligence of the community of the North, who are opposed both to slavery and to the fugitive law, foresee that if those objects are only to be obtained at the price of separation from the South, greater evils would probably accrue than those they are anxious to remove. However peaceably a separation might be made in appearance, it could never take place without the most bitter feelings of animosity. Junius describes the intensity of the feeling, by saying, "He hated me as much as if he had once been my friend;" and so it would assuredly prove. Squabbles would breed quarrels, and quarrels would grow into wars; the comparative harmony of a continent would be broken up, and standing armies and fleets become as necessary in the New World as they unfortunately are in the Old. If the South are determined to perpetuate Slavery, the only way it will ever cease to stain the Union is by the force of public opinion, and by the immigration of the white man gradually driving the negro southwards from State to State. As his value decreases, breeding for the market will gradually cease; and he may eventually die out if the millennium does not interfere with the process.

But maybe the strongest sentiment in the Republic that helps keep things calm is that the people in the North, who oppose both slavery and the fugitive law, realize that if achieving these goals means separating from the South, then worse problems could arise than the ones they want to eliminate. No matter how peacefully a separation might seem on the surface, it would inevitably come with deep animosity. Junius captures the intensity of this feeling by saying, "He hated me as much as if he had once been my friend;" and that's exactly how it would turn out. Small disputes would escalate into larger quarrels, and those conflicts would lead to wars; the relative peace of a continent would be shattered, and maintaining standing armies and fleets would become as necessary in the New World as they unfortunately are in the Old. If the South is set on maintaining slavery, the only way it will ever stop tainting the Union is through the force of public opinion and the gradual movement of white people pushing the Black population further south from State to State. As their value diminishes, breeding for the market will likely end; and they might eventually die out unless some future change disrupts this process.

Another, possible cause for division in the Union may come from California, in which State a feeble cry has already been heard of—"a Western Republic." The facility of intercourse afforded by railroads seems likely to stop the swelling of that cry; but if California did separate, it would not be attended with those evils which a disruption of the Southern States would inevitably produce. The only other chance of a division in the Republic which I can conceive possible is, in the event of a long war with any great maritime power, for ends which only affected one particular portion of the States; in which case the irresistible influence of the all mighty dollar might come into powerful action. The wealth of America is her commerce; whatever checks that, checks the pulsations of her vitality; and unless her honour was thoroughly compromised in the struggle, neither North nor South would be disposed to prolong a ruinous struggle for the sole benefit of the other. The prospects of such a contingency may, I trust, be deemed visionary. France is not likely to come in contact with the Union; and the only other maritime nation is Great Britain, whose interests are so identified with peace, that it is hardly possible she should encourage any other than the most friendly relations. Neither party could gain anything by a war, and both parties would inevitably suffer immensely; and although I fear there is but too strong evidence, that many ignoble minds in the Republic make blustering speeches, and strive to excite hostile feelings, the real intelligence and wealth of the States repudiate the unworthy sentiment, and deprecate any acts that could possibly lead to a collision between the two countries. Besides all which, there is that strong affinity between £. s. d. and dollars and cents, whereby so strong an influence is exercised over that commercial body which constitutes no unimportant portion of the wealth and intelligence of both nations.

Another possible cause for division in the Union could come from California, where a weak call for "a Western Republic" has already been heard. The ease of communication provided by railroads seems likely to quiet that call; however, if California were to separate, it wouldn’t bring the same problems that a breakup of the Southern States would inevitably cause. The only other scenario for a division in the Republic that I can imagine is if there were a long war with a major maritime power, for reasons that only affected one part of the States; in that case, the powerful influence of money could come into play. America's wealth comes from its trade; anything that hinders that also weakens its vitality; and unless its honor was seriously compromised in the conflict, neither the North nor the South would want to continue a damaging struggle just for the benefit of the other. I hope the chances of such a situation are seen as unlikely. France is not likely to confront the Union; and the only other maritime nation is Great Britain, whose interests are so tied to peace that it’s hard to imagine them encouraging anything but friendly relations. Neither side would gain anything from a war, and both would suffer greatly; and even though I fear there is clear evidence that many unworthy individuals in the Republic make loud speeches and try to stir up hostile feelings, the true intelligence and wealth of the States reject those unworthy sentiments and disapprove of any actions that could lead to conflict between the two countries. In addition to all of this, there is a strong connection between £. s. d. and dollars and cents, which strongly influences the commercial sector that makes up a significant part of the wealth and intelligence of both nations.

If the views I have taken be correct, it is indeed impossible to foreshadow the future of the United States; centuries must elapse ere it can become sufficiently peopled to test the adaptation of its present form of government to a thickly populated country; in the meantime, there seems scarcely a limit to her increase in wealth and prosperity. Her present gigantic stride among the nations of the world appears but an invisible atom, if compared with the boundless resources she encircles within her borders, not the least important of which is that mass of energy and intelligence she is, year by year, sowing broadcast throughout the length and breadth of the land, the Church and the School ever following in the train, and reproducing those elements to which she owes her present proud position.

If my views are correct, it's truly impossible to predict the future of the United States; it will take centuries before it becomes populated enough to really test whether its current form of government can work in a densely populated country. In the meantime, there seems to be almost no limit to its growth in wealth and prosperity. Its current rapid progress among the nations of the world seems like just a tiny speck when compared to the vast resources within its borders, one of the most significant being the surge of energy and intelligence it spreads across the land each year, with churches and schools always following close behind, nurturing the elements that have contributed to its impressive standing today.

My task is now done. I have endeavoured, in the preceding pages, to convey some general idea of the places I visited, and of the objects which appeared to me most worthy of notice. I have touched but lightly on Cuba, and I have not dwelt at any great length on the prosperous and rising colony of Canada. My remarks have been chiefly on the United States, which, differing in so many points from, the country of her birth, and occupying so conspicuous a place among the nations, presented the most extended field for observation and comment. I have on all occasions stated plainly the impressions produced upon my mind. I have freely remarked upon all those topics which, being public, I conceive to be the legitimate field for a traveller's criticism; where I have praised, or where I have condemned, I have equally endeavoured to explain my reasons. I have called attention to facts and opinions connected with my own country, where I thought similar points in the Republic might help to throw light upon them. Lastly, I have endeavoured to explain the various causes by which hostile feelings towards this country are engendered and spread abroad among a certain portion of the community; and I have stated my firm conviction, that the majority of the highest order of intelligence and character entertain a sincere desire to perpetuate our present friendly relations.

My task is now complete. In the previous pages, I aimed to share a general idea of the places I visited and the things that stood out to me. I have only briefly mentioned Cuba and haven't gone into detail about the thriving colony of Canada. My comments have primarily focused on the United States, which, differing in so many ways from its country of birth and playing a significant role among nations, offered the most expansive opportunity for observation and discussion. Throughout, I have clearly expressed the impressions that these experiences left on me. I've openly discussed all those topics that are public and, in my view, are fair game for a traveler's critique; whether I've praised or criticized, I've tried to explain my reasoning. I've pointed out facts and opinions related to my own country where I thought similar issues in the Republic might help clarify them. Finally, I've sought to explain the various reasons why negative feelings toward this country are stirred up and spread among certain groups in the community, and I firmly believe that most intelligent and principled people genuinely want to maintain our current friendly relations.

In conclusion, I would observe, that the opinions and feelings of a nation should not be hastily drawn from the writings of a passing traveller, or from the casual leaders of a Free Press. Man is ever prone to find fault with his neighbour, because the so doing involves a latent claim to superior intelligence in himself; but a man may condemn many things in a nation, while holding the nation itself in high esteem. The world is a large society,—a traveller is but one of the company, who converses through the Press; and as, in the smaller circles, conversation would die or freeze if nothing were stated but what could be mathematically proved, so would volumes of travels come to an untimely end, if they never passed beyond the dull boundary of facts. In both cases, opinions are the life of conversation; because, as no two people agree, they provoke discussion, through the openings of which, as truth oozes out, wise men catch it, leaving the refuse to the unreflecting.

In conclusion, I want to point out that we shouldn’t rush to form opinions and feelings about a nation based solely on the writings of a passing traveler or from the occasional headlines of a Free Press. People tend to criticize others because it gives them a hidden sense of superiority; however, someone can criticize many aspects of a nation while still holding the nation in high regard. The world is a vast community, and a traveler is just one person in that group, sharing their thoughts through the Press. Just like conversations in smaller groups would stall or become awkward if they only stuck to what could be mathematically proven, travel narratives would quickly lose interest if they never moved beyond boring facts. In both situations, opinions bring conversations to life; since no two people think alike, they spark discussions that allow truths to emerge, which thoughtful individuals can seize, leaving the shallow insights for those who don’t reflect deeply.

The late Lord Holland, who was equally remarkable for his kindness and his intelligence, is said to have observed, "I never met a man so great a fool, but what I could learn something from him." Reader, I am bound to confess his Lordship never met me; but I cannot take my leave without expressing a hope, that you will not be less fortunate than that amiable Peer.

The late Lord Holland, known for his kindness and intelligence, is reported to have said, "I’ve never met a man so foolish that I couldn’t learn something from him." Reader, I must admit his Lordship never met me; however, I can't say goodbye without hoping that you will have better luck than that kind Peer.

And now, farewell, thou Giant Republic! I have long since left thy shores; but I have brought with me, and fondly cherish, the recollection of the many pleasant days I spent within thy borders, and of all those friends whose unceasing hospitality and kindness tracked my path without intermission. I care not for the Filibusteros and Russian sympathizers; I know that the heart of the intelligence of thy people beats with friendly pulsations, to which that of my own countrymen readily responds. All we should, and I trust all we do, mutually desire, is, to encourage an honourable and increasing rivalry in arts, science, commerce, and good-will. He who would disturb our amicable relations, be he Briton or American, is unworthy of the name of a man; for he is a foe to Liberty—Humanity—and Christianity.

And now, goodbye, you Great Republic! I’ve long since left your shores, but I carry with me, and treasure, the memories of the many wonderful days I spent within your borders, and of all those friends whose endless hospitality and kindness followed me everywhere. I don’t care about the Filibusteros and Russian sympathizers; I know that the heart of your people beats with friendly rhythms that my fellow countrymen easily resonate with. All we should want, and I hope all we do want, is to promote honorable and growing competition in arts, science, commerce, and goodwill. Anyone who tries to disrupt our friendly relations, whether they are British or American, is unworthy of being called a man; because they are an enemy to Liberty—Humanity—and Christianity.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

The New York Herald is edited by two renegade British subjects, one of whom was, I am told, formerly a writer in a scurrilous publication in this country.


It has been cited as an example of their fondness for grand-sounding titles, that while, by the Census of Great Britain, there were only 2,328 physicians to 15,163 surgeons, in the United States there were 40,564 physicians to only 191 surgeons.


Vide chapter entitled "America's Press and England's Censor."


One of the few cases in which perhaps there is an advantage in the masses voting, is where a question of public advantage is brought forward, to which many and powerful local interests or monopolies are opposed. Take, for instance, the supply of London with good water, which the most utter dunderhead must admit to be most desirable; yet the influence of vested interests is so strong that its two millions of inhabitants seem destined to be poisoned for centuries, and the lanes and courts will, in all probability, continue as arid as the desert during the same period.—London, look at New York and blush!


While on the subject of eggs, I would ask my reader, did you ever, while eating the said article, find your patience sorely tried as each mouthful was being taken from its shell, and dipped carefully into the salt? If you have ever felt the inconvenience of this tedious process, let me suggest to you a simple remedy. After opening the egg, and taking out one spoonful, put in enough salt for the whole, and then on the top thereof pour a few drops of water; the saline liquid will pervade the whole nutritious substance, and thus render unnecessary those annoying transits above named, which make an egg as great a nuisance at the breakfast-table as a bore in society. Who first took out a patent for this dodge I cannot say, but I suppose it must have been a New Englander.



NOTES.


NOTE I.

NOTE I.

Extent of Telegraph in the United Kingdom.

Extent of Telegraph in the UK.

       Miles.                                   Miles of Wire.
               ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
       5,070      Underground                     5,000
                  Above ground                    20,700

               MAGNETIC TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
       1,740      Underground                     6,180
                  Above ground                     4,076

               SUBMARINE TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
         400      Underground                     2,740
                  Above ground                       —

               BRITISH TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
       1,000[CP]  Underground                     2,755
                  Above ground                     3,218

               IRISH TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
          88      Underground                       176
                  Above ground                       —
       -----                                      ------
Total  8,298                               Total  44,845

Of the foregoing, 534 miles are submarine, employing 1100 miles of wire. The cost of putting up a telegraph was originally 105l. per mile for two wires. Experience now enables it to be done for 50l., and that in a far more durable and efficient manner than is practised in the United States. The cost of laying down a submarine telegraph is stated to be about 230l. per mile for six wires, and 110l. for single wires.

Of the total, 534 miles are underwater, using 1,100 miles of wire. Initially, the cost to set up a telegraph was 105l. per mile for two wires. Now, experience allows it to be done for 50l, and in a much more durable and efficient way than what is done in the United States. The cost of installing an underwater telegraph is reported to be around 230l. per mile for six wires, and 110l for single wires.

One feature in which the telegraphs of Great Britain differ materially from those of America and all other countries, is, the great extent of underground lines. There are nearly 17,000 miles of wire placed underground in England, the cost of which is six times greater than that of overground lines; but it has the inestimable advantage of being never interrupted by changes of weather or by accidents, while the cost of its maintenance is extremely small. This fact must be borne in mind, when we come to consider the relative expense of the transmission of messages in England and the States.

One way the telegraphs in Great Britain are different from those in America and other countries is the extensive use of underground lines. There are almost 17,000 miles of wire buried underground in England, which costs six times more than above-ground lines. However, it has the invaluable benefit of never being disrupted by weather changes or accidents, and the maintenance costs are very low. This should be kept in mind when we look at the relative costs of sending messages in England and the U.S.

In the foregoing lines we have shown, that England possesses, miles of line, 8,298; miles of wire, 44,845; the United States possesses, miles of lines, 16,735; miles of wire, 23,281.

In the lines above, we've shown that England has 8,298 miles of lines and 44,845 miles of wire, while the United States has 16,735 miles of lines and 23,281 miles of wire.

We thus see, that the telegraph in the United States extends over more than twice as much ground as the British lines; while on the other hand the system of telegraph in England is so much more fully developed, that nearly double the quantity of wire is in actual use. On the English lines, which are in the hands of three companies only, from 25,000 to 30,000 miles are worked on Cook and Wheatstone's system; 10,000 on the magnetic system—without batteries;—3000 on Bain's chemical principle—which is rapidly extending;—and the remainder on Morse's plan.

We can see that the telegraph in the United States covers more than twice the area of the British lines. However, the telegraph system in England is much more developed, with nearly double the amount of wire actually in use. The English lines, which are operated by only three companies, have about 25,000 to 30,000 miles using Cook and Wheatstone's system; 10,000 miles on the magnetic system—without batteries; 3,000 miles based on Bain's chemical principle—which is quickly expanding; and the rest uses Morse's method.

The price of the transmission of messages is less in America than in England, especially if we regard the distance of transmission. In America a message is limited to ten words; in England to twenty words; and the message is delivered free within a certain distance from the station.

The cost of sending messages is lower in America than in England, especially when we consider the distance involved. In America, a message is capped at ten words; in England, it's twenty words; and the message is delivered for free within a certain distance from the station.

In both countries the names and addresses of the sender and receiver are sent free of charge. The average cost of transmission from London to every station in Great Britain is 13/10 of a penny per word per 100 miles. The average cost from Washington to all the principal towns in America is about 6/10 of a penny per word per 100 miles. The ordinary scale of charges for twenty words in England is 1s. for fifty miles and under; 2s. 6d. between fifty miles and 100 miles; all distances beyond that, 5s. with a few exceptions, where there is great competition. Having received the foregoing statement from a most competent authority, its accuracy may be confidently relied upon.

In both countries, the names and addresses of the sender and receiver are sent free of charge. The average cost of sending a message from London to every station in Great Britain is 13.10 pence per word per 100 miles. The average cost from Washington to all the main towns in America is about 6.10 pence per word per 100 miles. The typical rates for twenty words in England are 1 shilling for distances up to fifty miles; 2 shillings and 6 pence between fifty and 100 miles; and for distances beyond that, 5 shillings, with a few exceptions where competition is high. Having received this information from a highly qualified source, its accuracy can be trusted.

In conclusion, I would observe that the competition which is gradually growing up in this country must eventually compel a reduction of the present charges; but even before that desirable opposition arrives, the companies would, in my humble opinion, exercise a wise and profitable discretion by modifying their present system of charges. Originally the addresses of both parties were included in the number of words allowed; that absurdity is now given up, but one scarcely less ridiculous still remains—viz., twenty words being the shortest message upon which their charges are based. A merchant in New York can send a message to New Orleans, a distance of 2000 miles, and transact important business in ten words—say "Buy me a thousand bales of cotton—ship to Liverpool;" but if I want to telegraph from Windsor to London a distance of twenty miles, "Send me my portmanteau," I must pay for twenty words. Surely telegraph companies would show a sound discretion by lowering the scale to ten words, and charging two-thirds of the present price for twenty. Opposition would soon compel such a manifestly useful change; but, independent of all coercion, I believe those companies that strive the most to meet the reasonable demands of the public will always show the best balance-sheet at the end of the year.—Thirteenpence is more than one shilling.

In conclusion, I believe that the growing competition in this country will eventually force a reduction in current rates; however, even before that needed competition arrives, the companies would, in my opinion, make a smart and profitable choice by adjusting their current pricing system. Initially, the addresses of both parties were counted in the word limit; that ridiculous practice has been abandoned, but a similarly absurd one remains—namely, that twenty words is the minimum for which they charge. A merchant in New York can send a message to New Orleans, a distance of 2000 miles, and conduct important business in ten words—like "Buy me a thousand bales of cotton—ship to Liverpool;" but if I want to send a telegram from Windsor to London, just twenty miles away, saying "Send me my portmanteau," I have to pay for twenty words. Surely, telegraph companies would demonstrate good judgment by lowering the minimum to ten words and charging two-thirds of the current price for twenty. Competition would quickly drive such a clearly beneficial change; but, regardless of any external pressure, I believe that companies making the effort to meet the reasonable demands of the public will always have the best financial results at the end of the year.—Thirteenpence is more than one shilling.


NOTE II.

NOTE II.

A short Sketch of the Progress of Fire-arms.

A brief overview of the development of firearms.

The first clear notice which we have of rifles is in the year 1498, nearly 120 years after the invention of gunpowder was known to Europe. The Chinese, I believe, claim the invention 3000 years before the Creation. The first rifle-maker was one Zugler, in Germany, and his original object appears to have been merely to make the balls more ragged, so as to inflict more serious wounds; a result produced before that time by biting and hacking the balls. This appears clearly to have been the intention, inasmuch as the cuts were made perfectly straight in the first instance. The accurate dates of the introduction of the various twists I have not been able to ascertain.

The first clear record we have of rifles is from the year 1498, almost 120 years after gunpowder was introduced to Europe. The Chinese, I believe, claim to have invented it 3000 years before the Creation. The first rifle maker was a man named Zugler in Germany, and his initial goal seems to have been just to make the bullets more jagged to cause more serious injuries; something that was previously done by chewing and cutting the bullets. This was clearly his intent, as the cuts were made perfectly straight at first. I haven't been able to determine the exact dates for when the different twists were introduced.

I can find no mention of breech-loading arms before the reign of Henry VIII., since which time they have been constantly used in China and other parts of the East. In 1839, they were, I understand, extensively used in Norway. A breech-loading carbine, lately brought across to this country from America as the invention of Mr. Sharpe, was patented by a Mr. Melville, of London, as far back as 1838. I understand Mr. Sharpe's carbine was tried at Woolwich not long ago, and found to clog, owing to the expansion of the metal from consecutive firing. Nor has any breech-loading weapon hitherto introduced been able to make its way into extensive practical use, although the Americans have constantly used them in their navy for some years past. To return to ancient times.—There is a matchlock in the Tower of London with one barrel and a revolving breech cylinder which was made in the fifteenth century, and there is a pistol on a similar plan, and dating from Henry VIII., which may be seen in the Rotunda at Woolwich. The cylinders of both of these weapons were worked by hand.

I can’t find any mention of breech-loading firearms before the reign of Henry VIII, after which they’ve been consistently used in China and other parts of the East. In 1839, I hear they were widely used in Norway. A breech-loading carbine, recently brought over here from America and credited to Mr. Sharpe, was actually patented by Mr. Melville from London back in 1838. I’ve heard that Mr. Sharpe's carbine was tested at Woolwich not long ago and it got stuck because the metal expanded from repeated firing. No breech-loading weapon introduced so far has gained significant practical use, although the Americans have been using them in their navy for several years. Looking back to ancient times, there’s a matchlock in the Tower of London with one barrel and a revolving breech cylinder made in the fifteenth century, and there’s a pistol with a similar design from the time of Henry VIII, which can be seen in the Rotunda at Woolwich. The cylinders on both weapons were operated by hand.

The old matchlock, invented in 1471, gave way to a substitute scarcely less clumsy, and known by the initiated as the wheel-lock, the ignition taking place by the motion of the steel wheel against a fixed flint placed in the midst of the priming. This crude idea originated in 1530, and reigned undisputed until the invention of the common old flint and steel, about the year 1692, when this latter became lord paramount, which it still remains with some infatuated old gentlemen, in spite of the beautiful discovery of the application of fulminating powder, as a means of producing the discharge.

The old matchlock, invented in 1471, was replaced by a similarly awkward alternative known as the wheel-lock, which ignited by the movement of a steel wheel against a fixed flint situated in the priming powder. This basic concept emerged in 1530 and dominated until the common flint and steel was introduced around 1692, when it took over as the preferred method. Despite the advancements in using fulminating powder for ignition, some old-fashioned enthusiasts still cling to this outdated technology.

Mr. Forsyth patented this invention in 1807, but, whether from prejudice or want of perfection in its application, no general use was made of the copper cap until it was introduced among sportsmen by Mr. Egg, in 1818, and subsequently Mr. J. Manton patented his percussion tubes for a similar purpose. The use of the copper cap in the army dates 1842, or nearly a quarter of a century after its manifest advantages had been apparent to the rest of the community.

Mr. Forsyth patented this invention in 1807, but, whether due to bias or imperfections in its application, the copper cap wasn't widely used until Mr. Egg brought it to the attention of sportsmen in 1818. Later, Mr. J. Manton patented his percussion tubes for a similar use. The army started using the copper cap in 1842, almost twenty-five years after its clear benefits had been recognized by the general public.

Previous to this invention it was impossible to make revolving weapons practically available for general use.

Before this invention, it was impossible to make revolving weapons practical for general use.

The public are indebted to Mr. Jones for the ingenious mechanism by which continuous pressure on the trigger causes both the revolution of the barrels and the discharge of the piece; this patent goes back to 1829-1830. Colonel Colt first endeavoured to make a number of barrels revolve by raising the hammer, but the weight of the barrels suggested a return to the old rotatory cylinder, for which he took out a patent in 1835; and in 1836 he took out another patent for obtaining the rotatory motion by drawing back the trigger, and he subsequently introduced the addition of a lever ramrod fixed on to the barrel. Col. Colt came to the conclusion that the hammer-revolving cylinder was the more useful article, inasmuch as it enabled the person using it to take a more steady aim than with the other, which, revolving and firing by the action of the trigger, the moment of explosion could not be depended upon. To Col. Colt belongs the honour of so combining obsolete and modern inventions, and superadding such improvements of his own, as to produce the first practical and really serviceable weapon.

The public owes a lot to Mr. Jones for the clever design that allows continuous pressure on the trigger to not only rotate the barrels but also fire the weapon; this patent dates back to 1829-1830. Colonel Colt initially tried to make multiple barrels spin by pulling back the hammer, but the weight of the barrels led him to revert to the traditional rotating cylinder, for which he filed a patent in 1835. In 1836, he filed another patent for achieving the rotating motion by pulling the trigger, and he later added a lever ramrod attached to the barrel. Col. Colt concluded that the hammer-revolving cylinder was more practical because it allowed the user to aim more steadily than with the other design, where the explosion timing was unreliable due to its continuous rotation and firing from the trigger action. Col. Colt deserves credit for skillfully combining old and new inventions and adding his own improvements to create the first truly functional and effective weapon.

Since then Messrs. Dean and Adams, in 1852, revived the old invention of the trigger-revolving cylinder, which has the advantage of only requiring one hand to fire, but which is immeasurably inferior where accuracy of aim is wanted. Mr. Tranter, in 1853, patented a new invention, which, by employing a double trigger, combines the advantages of Colt and avoids the drawbacks of Dean and Adams. By a side-wind he has also adapted that invaluable application of Colt's—a fixed lever ramrod. Many other patents are springing up daily, too numerous to mention, and too similar to admit of easy definition.

Since then, in 1852, Messrs. Dean and Adams brought back the old invention of the trigger-revolving cylinder, which has the benefit of only needing one hand to fire, but is significantly worse when it comes to accuracy. Mr. Tranter patented a new invention in 1853 that uses a double trigger to combine the benefits of Colt while avoiding the downsides of Dean and Adams. He also cleverly adapted Colt's invaluable fixed lever ramrod. Many other patents are emerging daily, too many to list and too alike to easily categorize.

To return to rifles.—It is well known that the ordinary rifle in use until late years was the seven-grooved, with a spherical ball, and the two-grooved, with a zone bullet; the latter an invention known as the Brunswick rifle; and imported from Berlin about 1836. It was upon this weapon Mr. Lancaster proceeded to make some very ingenious experiments, widening the grooves gradually until at last they met, and an elliptic bore rifle was produced, for which he obtained a patent in July, 1850; but upon investigation it would be proved that Mr. Lancaster's patent was invalid, inasmuch as the elliptical bore rifle is of so ancient a date that it is mentioned in Scloppetaria—a work printed in 1808—as even then obsolete; the details, methods, and instruments for their fabrication are fully described therein; and I have seen a rifle of this kind, made by "Dumazin, à Paris," which is at least a century old; it is now in the possession of the Duke of Athole. Mr. Lancaster is entitled to the credit of bringing into practical use what others had thrown on one side as valueless.

To get back to rifles.—It’s well known that the standard rifle in use until recently was the seven-grooved, with a spherical ball, and the two-grooved, featuring a conical bullet; the latter is an invention known as the Brunswick rifle, imported from Berlin around 1836. Mr. Lancaster conducted some very clever experiments on this weapon, gradually widening the grooves until they eventually met, resulting in an elliptical bore rifle for which he secured a patent in July 1850. However, upon investigation, it was revealed that Mr. Lancaster's patent was invalid, as the elliptical bore rifle is so old that it is mentioned in Scloppetaria—a work printed in 1808—as already outdated; the details, methods, and tools for making them are fully described in that text. I have seen a rifle of this type, made by "Dumazin, à Paris," which is at least a hundred years old and is now owned by the Duke of Athole. Mr. Lancaster deserves credit for putting to practical use what others had dismissed as worthless.

From rifles I turn to balls, in which the chief feature of improvement is the introduction of the conical shape. The question of a conical ball with a saucer base is fully discussed in Scloppetaria, but no practical result seems to have been before the public until Monsieur Delvigue, in 1828, employed a solid conical ball, which, resting on the breech clear of the powder, he expanded by several blows with the ramrod sufficiently to make it take the grooves. Colonel Thouvenin introduced a steel spire into the breech, upon which the ball being forced, it expanded more readily. This spire is called the "tige." Colonel Tamisier cut three rings into the cylindrical surface of the bullet, to facilitate the expansion and improve its flight. These three combinations constitute the Carabine à Tige now in general use in the French army. Captain Minié—in, I believe, 1850—dispensed with the tige, and employed a conical hollow in the ball; into which, introducing an iron cup, the explosion of the powder produced the expansion requisite. As Captain Minié has made no change in the rifle, except removing a tige which was only lately introduced, it is certainly an extraordinary Irishism to call his conical ball a Minié rifle; it was partially adopted in England as early as 1851. Why his invention has not been taken up in France, I cannot say.

From rifles, I shift focus to bullets, where the main improvement is the adoption of a conical shape. The idea of a conical bullet with a saucer base is thoroughly explored in Scloppetaria, but it seems there hadn’t been any practical applications available to the public until Monsieur Delvigue, in 1828, used a solid conical bullet. He placed it over the breech, away from the powder, and then expanded it with several strikes of the ramrod enough to make it fit the grooves. Colonel Thouvenin added a steel spike into the breech that helped the bullet expand more easily when forced onto it. This spike is called the "tige." Colonel Tamisier created three rings on the bullet’s cylindrical surface to help with expansion and improve its trajectory. These three innovations form the Carabine à Tige, which is now widely used in the French army. Captain Minié—in, I believe, 1850—did away with the tige and used a hollow conical bullet instead; he placed an iron cup inside, so the explosion of the powder would cause the necessary expansion. Since Captain Minié made no changes to the rifle except for removing a tige that was only recently added, it’s quite odd to label his conical bullet as a Minié rifle; it was used in England as early as 1851. I’m not sure why his invention hasn’t caught on in France.

Miraculous to remark, the British Government for once appear to have appreciated a useful invention, and various experiments with the Minié ball were carried on with an energy so unusual as to be startling. It being discovered that the iron cup had various disadvantages, besides being a compound article, a tornado of inventions rushed in upon the Government with every variety of modification. The successful competitor of this countless host was Mr. Pritchett, who, while dispensing with the cup entirely, produced the most satisfactory results with a simple conical bullet imperceptibly saucered out in the base, and which is now the generally adopted bullet in Her Majesty's service. The reader will recognise in Mr. Pritchett's bullet a small modification of the conical ball alluded to in Scloppetaria nearly fifty years ago.

It's amazing to note that the British Government has, for once, seemed to appreciate a handy invention, and various experiments with the Minié ball were conducted with an unusual enthusiasm that was quite surprising. Upon discovering that the iron cup had several drawbacks, in addition to being a mixed component, a flood of inventions came rushing in to the Government with every kind of modification. The standout among this vast number was Mr. Pritchett, who eliminated the cup entirely and achieved the most satisfying results with a simple conical bullet that has a slightly hollowed base, which is now the standard bullet used in Her Majesty's service. The reader will recognize Mr. Pritchett's bullet as a small modification of the conical ball mentioned in Scloppetaria nearly fifty years ago.

Through the kindness of a friend, I have been able to get some information as to the vexed question of the Minié ball, which militates against some of the claims of the French captain, if invention be one. The character of the friend through whom I have been put in correspondence with the gentleman named below, I feel to be a sufficient guarantee for the truthfulness of the statements which I here subjoin.

Through a friend's kindness, I’ve managed to get some information about the controversial Minié ball, which challenges some of the claims made by the French captain, if we consider it an invention. I trust the character of the friend who connected me with the individual mentioned below is a strong enough guarantee of the truthfulness of the statements I provide here.

Mr. Stanton, a proprietor of collieries at Newcastle-on-Tyne, conceived the idea that if a bullet were made to receive the projectile force in the interior of the bullet, but beyond the centre of gravity, it would continue its flight without deviation. Having satisfied himself of the truth of this theory, he sent the mould to the Board of Ordnance on the 20th of January, 1797, and received a reply the following month, stating that upon trial it was found to be less accurate in its flight and less powerful in its penetration than the round bullet then in use. They also informed Mr. Stanton that there were some conical balls in the repository which had been deposited there by the late Lieutenant-General Parker, and which, having more solidity, were superior to those sent by Mr. Stanton, thus proving that the idea of a conical expanding ball is of very ancient date. The mould sent to the Ordnance by Mr. Stanton was taken from a wooden model, of which the accompanying is an exact diagram, and which is in the possession of Mr. Stanton, solicitor, at Newcastle, the son of the originator. Evidence is afforded that Mr. Boyd a banker, and Mr. Stanton, sen., both tried the ball with very different success to that obtained at Woolwich; but this need excite no astonishment, as every sportsman is aware of the wonderful difference in the accuracy with which smooth-bored fire-arms carry balls, and for which no satisfactory reason has ever been advanced. Mr. Kell was subsequently present when his friend Mr. Stanton, jun., had balls made on his father's principle for a pair of Wogden's pistols thirty years ago; the result is reported as satisfactory.

Mr. Stanton, a owner of coal mines in Newcastle-on-Tyne, came up with the idea that if a bullet was designed to handle the force of the projectile inside the bullet, but positioned beyond its center of gravity, it would fly straight without veering off course. After confirming his theory, he submitted the mold to the Board of Ordnance on January 20, 1797, and received a response the following month stating that tests showed it was less accurate in flight and less powerful in penetration compared to the round bullet in use at the time. They also informed Mr. Stanton that there were some conical bullets in storage, left there by the late Lieutenant-General Parker, which were more solid and thus superior to those sent by Mr. Stanton, indicating that the concept of a conical expanding bullet has been around for a long time. The mold that Mr. Stanton sent to the Ordnance was based on a wooden model, which is accurately illustrated in the accompanying diagram and is currently held by Mr. Stanton, solicitor, in Newcastle, who is the son of the inventor. Evidence shows that Mr. Boyd, a banker, and Mr. Stanton, senior, both tested the bullet with very different results than those obtained at Woolwich; however, this is not too surprising since every shooter knows how drastically accuracy can vary with smooth-bore firearms, and no satisfying explanation for this has ever been provided. Mr. Kell was also present when his friend, Mr. Stanton, junior, had bullets made based on his father’s design for a pair of Wogden's pistols thirty years ago; the results were reported as satisfactory.

In 1829, Mr. Kell conceived the idea of applying the principle to rifles, for which purpose he had a mould made by Mr. Thomas Bulcraig. Mr. Kell altered the original ball in two points; he made the sides stronger, and he formed the front of the ball conoidical instead of hemispherical. I have the ball made from that mould now lying before me, and it is precisely the same as the Minié ball without the iron cup, which we have shown in the preceding pages is totally unnecessary. This ball has been constantly in use by Mr. Kell and others until the present day; it is the first application of a conical expanding ball to rifles that I can find on record, and whatever credit is due to the person who transferred the expanding ball from a smooth bore wherein it was useless, to a rifle wherein it is now proved to be invaluable, belongs, as far as I can trace the application back, to Mr. Kell, A.D. 1829.

In 1829, Mr. Kell had the idea of applying this principle to rifles, for which he had a mold created by Mr. Thomas Bulcraig. Mr. Kell made two modifications to the original ball; he reinforced the sides and shaped the front of the ball to be conical instead of hemispherical. I have the ball made from that mold right in front of me, and it’s exactly like the Minié ball without the iron cup, which we’ve shown in the previous pages is completely unnecessary. This ball has been regularly used by Mr. Kell and others up to the present day; it’s the first recorded use of a conical expanding ball for rifles that I can find, and any credit for moving the expanding ball from a smooth bore, where it was ineffective, to a rifle, where it has proven to be essential, goes, as far as I can trace it back, to Mr. Kell, in 1829.

In 1830, Mr. Kell employed Mr. Greener, then a gunmaker at Newcastle, to make him a mould for a double pea rifle, and he left in Mr. Greener's hands one of the balls made for the Wogden pistol, and one of those made by Mr. Bulcraig, to assist him in so doing. It appears that Mr. Greener must have been satisfied with the success attending Mr. Kell's application of the conical ball to a rifle, for some years after, in August, 1836, he applied to the Ordnance for permission to have a trial of the conical ball made; this was granted, and the experiment was conducted under Major Walcott of the Royal Artillery, on the sands near Tynemouth Castle, the firing party consisting of a company of the 60th Rifles. Mr. Greener having failed to bring a target, to test the superior penetrating power of his balls, the ordinary Artillery target was used. Mr. Greener's ball had a conical plug of lead in the hollow, for the purpose of producing the expansion when driven home by the force of the powder. After firing several rounds at two hundred yards, only one ball of Mr. Greener's, which had struck the target, was found to have the plug driven home, the others had all lost their plugs. The same effect was produced when firing into a sand-bank. A trial was then made at 350 yards; the spherical balls and the conical balls both went home to the target, but only one of the latter penetrated.

In 1830, Mr. Kell hired Mr. Greener, who was a gunmaker in Newcastle, to create a mold for a double pea rifle. He gave Mr. Greener one of the balls made for the Wogden pistol and one made by Mr. Bulcraig to help with this task. It seems that Mr. Greener was pleased with how well Mr. Kell's use of the conical ball in a rifle worked out, because several years later, in August 1836, he requested permission from the Ordnance to test the conical ball he had made; this was approved, and the experiment took place under Major Walcott of the Royal Artillery on the sands near Tynemouth Castle, with a firing team made up of a company from the 60th Rifles. Since Mr. Greener forgot to bring a target to demonstrate the superior penetrating ability of his balls, the standard artillery target was used instead. Mr. Greener's ball was designed with a conical lead plug inside it to promote expansion when driven by the powder's force. After firing several rounds at two hundred yards, only one of Mr. Greener's balls that hit the target was found to have its plug driven in; the rest had all lost their plugs. The same result occurred when firing into a sand bank. They then tested from a distance of 350 yards; both the spherical and conical balls reached the target, but only one of the conical balls penetrated.

The objections pointed out to the conical ball were: the frequent loss of the plug, by which its weight was diminished; the inconvenience of having a hall composed of two separate parts; the difficulty of loading if the plug was not placed accurately in the centre; and the danger of the plug losing its place in consequence of being put in loosely, especially when carried about for any length of time in a cartridge.—Mr. Greener loaded the rifles during the trial with the ball and powder separate, not in cartridge.—The advantage admitted was, merely, rapidity of loading if the plug was fairly placed: no superiority of range appears to have been produced over the rifles used by the 60th Regiment. Mr. Greener solicited another trial, but after the report of Major Walcott, the Select Committee considering the ball "useless and chimerical," no further trial was accorded. The conical ball question was thus once more doomed to oblivion.

The issues raised about the conical ball were: the frequent loss of the plug, which reduced its weight; the inconvenience of having a ball made up of two separate parts; the difficulty of loading if the plug wasn’t positioned exactly in the center; and the risk of the plug moving out of place due to being inserted loosely, especially when carried around for long periods in a cartridge. Mr. Greener loaded the rifles during the trial with the ball and powder separate, not in cartridge form. The only acknowledged advantage was the speed of loading if the plug was properly positioned: no improvement in range was noted compared to the rifles used by the 60th Regiment. Mr. Greener requested another trial, but after Major Walcott's report, the Select Committee deemed the ball "useless and chimerical," so no further trials were conducted. The conical ball issue was once again destined to be forgotten.

In process of time the fabulous ranges of the "Carabine à Tige" were heard of, and when it was ascertained that the French riflemen potted the gunners on the ramparts of Rome with such rapidity that they could not stand to their guns before a rifle nearly a mile distant, the cone shape once more turned up, and Captain Minié came forward as the champion of the old expanding ball. The toscin of war was sounded in the East; the public were crying aloud for British arms to be put upon an equality with those of foreign armies; the veterans who had earned their laurels under poor old "Brown Bess" stuck faithfully to her in her death-struggle, and dropped a tear over the triumph of new-fangled notions.

Over time, the incredible ranges of the "Carabine à Tige" became known, and when it was confirmed that French riflemen were taking out gunners on the ramparts of Rome so quickly that they couldn’t hold their positions a mile away, the cone shape appeared again, and Captain Minié stepped up as the advocate for the old expanding bullet. The call to arms was sounded in the East; the public was demanding that British weaponry be on par with that of foreign armies; the veterans who had fought valiantly with the old "Brown Bess" remained loyal to her in her final moments and shed a tear over the success of newfangled ideas.

In the middle of last century Lieutenant-General Parker's ball was thrown aside; at the end of the century, Mr. Stanton's shared the same fate; Mr. Greener's followed in 1836 with equal ill success; Captain Minié's had a short reign, and was in turn superseded by the more solid and superior ball now in use, and for which the country is indebted to the experimental perseverance of Mr. Pritchett; and if ever things obtain their right names, the weapon of the British army will be called the Pritchett ball and not the Minié rifle; but as the world persists in calling the Missouri the Mississippi, I suppose the British public will behave equally shabbily by Mr. Pritchett. The reader will judge for himself of the respective credit due to the various persons through whose ingenuity we have at length succeeded in obtaining the present efficient ball, the wounds from which are more frightful than pen can portray.

In the middle of last century, Lieutenant-General Parker's ball was discarded; by the end of the century, Mr. Stanton's met the same fate; Mr. Greener's followed in 1836 with equal lack of success; Captain Minié's had a brief period of use, and was eventually replaced by the more reliable and superior ball we now use, thanks to the experimental dedication of Mr. Pritchett. If things ever receive their proper names, the weapon of the British army will be called the Pritchett ball and not the Minié rifle. But just as the world insists on calling the Missouri the Mississippi, I suppose the British public will treat Mr. Pritchett in a similarly neglectful way. The reader can decide for themselves how much credit is due to the various individuals whose ingenuity has finally helped us achieve the current effective ball, which causes wounds more horrific than words can describe.

There is, however, one lesson which we should learn from the great opposition there has been to the introduction of the conical ball, and that is, the advantage of remodelling the department to which such inventions are referred. The foregoing remarks appear to me conclusive evidence that the testing of fire-arms should not be left to age and experience alone. Prejudice is all but inseparable from age—young and fresh blood is a powerful auxiliary. What I would suggest is, that there should be a special examination to qualify officers of the engineers and artillery to sit in judgment on so important a subject as arms and missiles; and I would then propose that two officers of the former corps, and five of the latter, be selected from those below the rank of field-officer, to form a separate and junior Board, and that each Board should send in its own report. The method of selection which I would suggest is by ballot or vote of those Officers of the same rank in their respective corps; for I feel sure that those who live most together are the best acquainted with one another's talents. If two Boards are objectionable, form one Board, of which one-half shall be of the junior rank; and if they be equally divided in opinion, let the higher authority appoint an umpire and order a second trial.

There is, however, one lesson we should take from the strong resistance to introducing the conical ball, and that is the benefit of restructuring the department related to such inventions. The previous comments seem to me to be clear evidence that testing firearms shouldn’t rely solely on age and experience. Prejudice is almost always linked to age—new and energetic perspectives are a valuable asset. What I suggest is that there should be a special examination to qualify officers in the engineering and artillery branches to evaluate such an important topic as weapons and projectiles; I would then propose that two officers from the engineering branch and five from the artillery branch, all below the rank of field officer, be chosen to form a separate junior Board, and that each Board should submit its own report. The selection method I recommend is through a ballot or vote among officers of the same rank in their respective corps, as I believe those who work closely together know each other’s skills best. If having two Boards is problematic, then create one Board, with half of its members being of junior rank; and if they are equally split in their opinions, let the higher authority appoint an umpire and call for a second trial.

Remember how long the now all-but-forgotten "Brown Bess" kept the field against the adversary which has since proved her immeasurable superior; and let the future prove that past experience has not been entirely thrown away. Trials may be troublesome, but officers are paid for taking trouble; and the ingenuity of inventors will always be quickened in proportion to the conviction that their inventions will receive a full and unprejudiced trial; and that, if their first shot at the target of Success be an outside ringer, they will not be denied a chance of throwing another in the Bull's-eye.

Remember how long the now mostly forgotten "Brown Bess" held its ground against the enemy that has since shown itself to be far superior; and let the future show that our past experiences haven’t been entirely wasted. Challenges can be tough, but officers are paid to handle them; and the creativity of inventors will always be fueled by the belief that their inventions will get a fair and unbiased trial; and that, if their first attempt at hitting the target of Success misses, they won’t be denied a chance to aim for the Bull's-eye again.

Since the foregoing remarks went to press, it appears that the Pritchett ball has been found wanting, both in England and in the Crimea; its flight is said to be irregular, and the deposit of lead in the barrel so great that after thirty rounds the charge cannot be got down. If this be so, it is only one more proof of the necessity for some improvement in the Board appointed to judge of and superintend warlike missiles.

Since the previous comments were published, it seems that the Pritchett ball has been found lacking, both in England and in the Crimea; its trajectory is reported to be inconsistent, and the buildup of lead in the barrel is so significant that after thirty shots, the charge cannot be pushed down. If this is true, it’s just another indication of the need for improvements in the Board responsible for evaluating and overseeing military projectiles.

When Mr. Pritchett had perfected his ball, it was tried in the three-groove rifle, for which it was intended, with the most satisfactory results, and was fired an indefinite number of times without the slightest difficulty. It appears, however, that this successful trial was not sufficient to satisfy the new-born zeal of the authorities. Accordingly, a conclave of gunmakers was consulted previous to the order for manufacturing being sent to Enfield; but with a depth of wisdom far beyond human penetration, they never asked the opinion of Mr. Pritchett, who had made the rifle which had carried the ball so satisfactorily.

When Mr. Pritchett had perfected his bullet, it was tested in the three-groove rifle, for which it was designed, with excellent results, and was fired countless times without the slightest issue. However, it seems that this successful trial didn’t satisfy the newfound enthusiasm of the authorities. As a result, a meeting of gunmakers was held before the manufacturing order was sent to Enfield; yet, with a depth of insight far beyond anyone's understanding, they never consulted Mr. Pritchett, who had created the rifle that had performed so well with the bullet.

The wise men decided that it would be an improvement if the grooves were deepened—a strange decision, when all the experience of the day tends to prove that the shallower the groove the better. Down went the order; the improved rifles were made as fast as possible, and in the month of March they went to the seat of war. May is hardly passed by, and the sad fact discovered in the Crimea is echoed back on our shores, that after thirty rounds the soldiers may right about face or trust to cold steel. I think my youngest boy—if I had one—would have suggested testing the improvement before indulging the army with the weapon. Perhaps the authorities went on the principle that a rifle is a rifle, and a ball is a ball, and therefore that it must be all right. It might as well be said a chancellor is a chancellor, and a black dose is a black dose; therefore, because an able Aesculapius had prescribed a draught which had proved eminently useful to bilious Benjamin, it must agree equally well with lymphatic William.—Never mind, my dear John Bull, sixpence more in the pound Income-tax will remedy the little oversight.

The wise men decided it would be better if the grooves were made deeper—a strange choice, considering that all the evidence shows that shallower grooves are actually better. The order was given; the upgraded rifles were produced as quickly as possible, and by March, they were sent to the battlefield. May is barely over, and the unfortunate reality discovered in Crimea is echoing back to us: after thirty rounds, soldiers can either turn around or rely on their bayonets. I think my youngest son—if I had one—would have suggested testing the improvements before giving the army this new weapon. Maybe the officials operated on the assumption that a rifle is a rifle, and a bullet is a bullet, so everything must be fine. It’s like saying a chancellor is a chancellor, and a strong medicine is a strong medicine; just because a skilled doctor prescribed a remedy that worked well for anxious Benjamin, it must be just as effective for lethargic William. —Never mind, my dear John Bull, an extra sixpence on the pound in Income Tax will fix this little oversight.

Three years have elapsed since these observations were penned, and behold a giant competitor has entered the field, threatening utter annihilation to the three-groove (or Enfield) rifle and the Pritchett ball. Mr. Whitworth (whose mechanical powers have realized an accuracy almost fabulous), after a long course of experiments made at the Government's expence, has produced a rifle with an hexagonal box and ball, the correctness of which, at 1100 yards, has proved nearly equal to that of the Enfield at 500 yards, and possessing a penetrating power of wonderful superiority; the Enfield rifle ball scarcely penetrated 13 half-inch Elm planks. Whitworth's hexagonal ball penetrated 33, and buried itself in the solid block of wood behind. It remains to be seen whether this formidable weapon can be made at such a price as to render it available for military purposes. The hexagonal bore is not a new invention, some of the Russians having used it in the late Baltic campaign; but it is doubtless Mr. Whitworth's wonderful accuracy of construction that is destined to give it celebrity, by arming it with a power and correctness it wanted before.[CQ] An explosive ball has also been introduced by Colonel Jacob of Eastern celebrity, which from its greater flight will prove, when perfected, a more deadly arm than the old spherical explosive ball invented and forgotten years ago. With the daily improvements in science, we may soon expect to see Colonel Jacob's in general use, unless the same principle applied to Whitworth's hexagonal ball should be found preferable.

Three years have passed since these observations were written, and now a major competitor has entered the scene, threatening to completely replace the three-groove (or Enfield) rifle and the Pritchett ball. Mr. Whitworth, whose engineering skills have achieved astonishing accuracy, after extensive experiments funded by the Government, has created a rifle with a hexagonal box and ball, which at 1100 yards, is nearly as accurate as the Enfield at 500 yards, and has impressive penetrating power; the Enfield rifle ball barely penetrated 13 half-inch Elm planks. In contrast, Whitworth's hexagonal ball penetrated 33 and embedded itself in the solid block of wood behind. It remains to be seen whether this formidable weapon can be produced at a cost that makes it viable for military use. The hexagonal bore isn't a new idea, as some Russians used it in the recent Baltic campaign; however, it is undoubtedly Mr. Whitworth's exceptional construction accuracy that is set to give it fame by equipping it with the power and precision it lacked previously. [CQ] An explosive ball has also been developed by Colonel Jacob, known for his achievements in the East, which, with its longer range, will likely become a more lethal weapon than the outdated spherical explosive ball that was invented and forgotten years ago. With the ongoing advancements in science, we can soon expect Colonel Jacob's design to be widely used, unless a better application of the same principle to Whitworth's hexagonal ball is discovered.


To those who are amateurs of the rifle, I would recommend a pamphlet, written by Chapman, and published in New York; it is chiefly intended for those who delight in the infantine or octogenarian amusement of peppering a target, but it also contains many points of interest. Among other subjects discussed are the following:—The quantity of twist requisite in a rifle barrel—the gaining twist, as opposed to Mr. Greener, and the decreasing twist—the size of ball best suited to different distances—the swedge, by which a ball, being cast rather larger than requisite, is compressed into a more solid mass—the powder to use, decreasing in size of the grain in proportion to the diminishing length of barrel—the loading muzzle, by which the lips of the grooves are preserved as sharp as a razor, &c. The pamphlet can easily be procured through Messrs. Appleton, of New York and London.

For those who are new to using a rifle, I recommend a pamphlet by Chapman, published in New York. It's mainly for those who enjoy the simple pleasure of shooting at targets, whether they're beginners or older enthusiasts, but it also includes many interesting details. Some topics covered are: the necessary twist in a rifle barrel—the gaining twist versus Mr. Greener's decreasing twist—the best ball size for different distances—the swedge, which compresses a ball cast slightly larger than needed into a denser form—the type of powder to use, with smaller grain size relative to shorter barrel lengths—and the muzzle loading technique, which keeps the grooves as sharp as a razor, etc. You can easily get the pamphlet from Messrs. Appleton in New York and London.


THE END.

THE END.


FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:

The miles of distance may not be quite exact, but the miles of wire may be depended upon.


The trial between the Enfield and the Whitworth rifles cannot be yet considered conclusive, as there was a difference in the bore of the rifles, and also Mr. Whitworth used a different kind of ball for penetration to that used for long range.




        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!