This is a modern-English version of The War With the United States : A Chronicle of 1812, originally written by Wood, William. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.









CHRONICLES OF CANADA

Edited by George M. Wrong and H. H. Langton

In thirty-two volumes

Volume 14

THE WAR WITH THE UNITED STATES

A Chronicle of 1812

By WILLIAM WOOD

TORONTO, 1915


CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS










CHAPTER I — OPPOSING CLAIMS

International disputes that end in war are not generally questions of absolute right and wrong. They may quite as well be questions of opposing rights. But, when there are rights on both sides; it is usually found that the side which takes the initiative is moved by its national desires as well as by its claims of right.

International conflicts that lead to war are not usually about clear-cut right and wrong. They often involve clashing rights. However, when both sides have legitimate claims, it tends to be the case that the side that takes action is driven by its national interests as well as its assertions of right.

This could hardly be better exemplified than by the vexed questions which brought about the War of 1812. The British were fighting for life and liberty against Napoleon. Napoleon was fighting to master the whole of Europe. The United States wished to make as much as possible out of unrestricted trade with both belligerents. But Napoleon's Berlin Decree forbade all intercourse whatever with the British, while the British Orders-in-Council forbade all intercourse whatever with Napoleon and his allies, except on condition that the trade should first pass through British ports. Between two such desperate antagonists there was no safe place for an unarmed, independent, 'free-trading' neutral. Every one was forced to take sides. The British being overwhelmingly strong at sea, while the French were correspondingly strong on land, American shipping was bound to suffer more from the British than from the French. The French seized every American vessel that infringed the Berlin Decree whenever they could manage to do so. But the British seized so many more for infringing the Orders-in-Council that the Americans naturally began to take sides with the French.

This could hardly be better shown than by the complicated issues that led to the War of 1812. The British were fighting for their survival and freedom against Napoleon. Napoleon was trying to dominate all of Europe. The United States wanted to maximize its benefits from unrestricted trade with both parties involved in the conflict. However, Napoleon's Berlin Decree banned all trade with the British, while the British Orders-in-Council prohibited all trade with Napoleon and his allies unless the goods first went through British ports. In such a situation with two fierce opponents, there was no safe ground for a neutral, unarmed, "free-trading" nation. Everyone was forced to choose a side. With the British being overwhelmingly strong at sea and the French correspondingly strong on land, American shipping was bound to suffer more at the hands of the British than the French. The French seized every American ship that violated the Berlin Decree whenever they could. But the British captured so many more for breaking the Orders-in-Council that Americans naturally began to align themselves with the French.

Worse still, from the American point of view, was the British Right of Search, which meant the right of searching neutral merchant vessels either in British waters or on the high seas for deserters from the Royal Navy. Every other people whose navy could enforce it had always claimed a similar right. But other peoples' rights had never clashed with American interests in at all the same way. What really roused the American government was not the abstract Right of Search, but its enforcement at a time when so many hands aboard American vessels were British subjects evading service in their own Navy. The American theory was that the flag covered the crew wherever the ship might be. Such a theory might well have been made a question for friendly debate and settlement at any other time. But it was a new theory, advanced by a new nation, whose peculiar and most disturbing entrance on the international scene could not be suffered to upset the accepted state of things during the stress of a life-and-death war. Under existing circumstances the British could not possibly give up their long-established Right of Search without committing national suicide. Neither could they relax their own blockade so long as Napoleon maintained his. The Right of Search and the double blockade of Europe thus became two vexed questions which led straight to war.

Worse yet, from the American perspective, was the British Right of Search, which allowed them to search neutral merchant ships in British waters or on the open sea for deserters from the Royal Navy. Other nations whose navies could enforce it had always claimed a similar right, but those rights never conflicted with American interests in the same way. What truly angered the American government wasn’t just the abstract Right of Search but its enforcement, especially when many crew members on American ships were British subjects avoiding service in their own Navy. The American view was that the flag protected the crew no matter where the ship was located. Normally, this idea might have been open for friendly debate and resolution. However, it was a new concept introduced by a new nation, and its unsettling emergence on the global stage could not be allowed to disrupt the established order during a time of life-and-death war. Given the circumstances, the British couldn’t give up their long-held Right of Search without risking national disaster. Nor could they ease their blockade while Napoleon maintained his. Thus, the Right of Search and the dual blockade of Europe became two contentious issues that led directly to war.

But the American grievances about these two questions were not the only motives impelling the United States to take up arms. There were two deeply rooted national desires urging them on in the same direction. A good many Americans were ready to seize any chance of venting their anti-British feeling; and most Americans thought they would only be fulfilling their proper 'destiny' by wresting the whole of Canada from the British crown. These two national desires worked both ways for war—supporting the government case against the British Orders-in-Council and Right of Search on the one hand, while welcoming an alliance with Napoleon on the other. Americans were far from being unanimous; and the party in favour of peace was not slow to point out that Napoleon stood for tyranny, while the British stood for freedom. But the adherents of the war party reminded each other, as well as the British and the French, that Britain had wrested Canada from France, while France had helped to wrest the Thirteen Colonies from the British Empire.

But the American issues with these two matters weren’t the only reasons driving the United States to go to war. There were two deeply ingrained national desires pushing them in the same direction. A lot of Americans were eager to express their anti-British sentiments, and most believed they were fulfilling their supposed 'destiny' by taking all of Canada from the British crown. These two national desires fueled the push for war—supporting the government's stance against the British Orders-in-Council and Right of Search on one side, while also welcoming an alliance with Napoleon on the other. Americans were far from united, and the peace supporters quickly pointed out that Napoleon represented tyranny, while the British represented freedom. However, the war supporters reminded each other, as well as the British and the French, that Britain had taken Canada from France, while France had helped take the Thirteen Colonies from the British Empire.

As usual in all modern wars, there was much official verbiage about the national claims and only unofficial talk about the national desires. But, again as usual, the claims became the more insistent because of the desires, and the desires became the more patriotically respectable because of the claims of right. 'Free Trade and Sailors' Rights' was the popular catchword that best describes the two strong claims of the United States. 'Down with the British' and 'On to Canada' were the phrases that best reveal the two impelling national desires.

As is typical in all modern wars, there was plenty of official language about national claims and only informal conversations about national desires. However, as usual, the claims became more demanding because of the desires, and the desires gained more patriotic respectability because of the claims of right. "Free Trade and Sailors' Rights" was the popular slogan that best captured the two strong claims of the United States. "Down with the British" and "On to Canada" were the phrases that best revealed the two driving national desires.

Both the claims and the desires seem quite simple in themselves. But, in their connection with American politics, international affairs, and opposing British claims, they are complex to the last degree. Their complexities, indeed, are so tortuous and so multitudinous that they baffle description within the limits of the present book. Yet, since nothing can be understood without some reference to its antecedents, we must take at least a bird's-eye view of the growing entanglement which finally resulted in the War of 1812.

Both the claims and desires seem pretty straightforward on their own. However, when connected to American politics, international relations, and conflicting British claims, they become extremely complex. In fact, their complexities are so intricate and numerous that they defy explanation within the boundaries of this book. Still, since nothing can be understood without some context, we should at least take a quick look at the escalating mess that ultimately led to the War of 1812.

The relations of the British Empire with the United States passed through four gradually darkening phases between 1783 and 1812—the phases of Accommodation, Unfriendliness, Hostility, and War. Accommodation lasted from the recognition of Independence till the end of the century. Unfriendliness then began with President Jefferson and the Democrats. Hostility followed in 1807, during Jefferson's second term, when Napoleon's Berlin Decree and the British. Orders-in-Council brought American foreign relations into the five-year crisis which ended with the three-year war.

The relationship between the British Empire and the United States went through four increasingly negative phases between 1783 and 1812: Accommodation, Unfriendliness, Hostility, and War. Accommodation lasted from the recognition of Independence until the end of the century. Unfriendliness then started with President Jefferson and the Democrats. Hostility began in 1807, during Jefferson's second term, when Napoleon's Berlin Decree and the British Orders-in-Council plunged American foreign relations into a five-year crisis that ended with a three-year war.

William Pitt, for the British, and John Jay, the first chief justice of the United States, are the two principal figures in the Accommodation period. In 1783 Pitt, who, like his father, the great Earl of Chatham, was favourably disposed towards the Americans, introduced a temporary measure in the British House of Commons to regulate trade with what was now a foreign country 'on the most enlarged principles of reciprocal benefit' as well as 'on terms of most perfect amity with the United States of America.' This bill, which showed the influence of Adam Smith's principles on Pitt's receptive mind, favoured American more than any other foreign trade in the mother country, and favoured it to a still greater extent in the West Indies. Alone among foreigners the Americans were to be granted the privilege of trading between their own ports and the West Indies, in their own vessels and with their own goods, on exactly the same terms as the British themselves. The bill was rejected. But in 1794, when the French Revolution was running its course of wild excesses, and the British government was even less inclined to trust republics, Jay succeeded in negotiating a temporary treaty which improved the position of American sea-borne trade with the West Indies. His government urged him to get explicit statements of principle inserted, more especially anything that would make cargoes neutral when under neutral flags. This, however, was not possible, as Jay himself pointed out. 'That Britain,' he said, 'at this period, and involved in war, should not admit principles which would impeach the propriety of her conduct in seizing provisions bound to France, and enemy's property on board neutral vessels, does not appear to me extraordinary.' On the whole, Jay did very well to get any treaty through at such a time; and this mere fact shows that the general attitude of the mother country towards her independent children was far from being unfriendly.

William Pitt, representing Britain, and John Jay, the first chief justice of the United States, are the two key figures of the Accommodation period. In 1783, Pitt, who, like his father, the great Earl of Chatham, supported the Americans, introduced a temporary measure in the British House of Commons to regulate trade with what had now become a foreign country "on the most expansive principles of mutual benefit" as well as "on terms of perfect friendship with the United States of America." This bill, reflecting the influence of Adam Smith's ideas on Pitt's receptive mind, favored American trade more than any other foreign trade in Britain, and favored it even more in the West Indies. The Americans alone, among foreigners, were to be granted the privilege of trading between their own ports and the West Indies, using their own ships and goods, on the same terms as the British themselves. The bill was rejected. However, in 1794, during the chaotic period of the French Revolution, when the British government was even less willing to trust republics, Jay managed to negotiate a temporary treaty that improved the position of American sea trade with the West Indies. His government encouraged him to include clear statements of principle, especially anything that would make cargoes neutral when flying neutral flags. This wasn't possible, as Jay himself observed. "That Britain," he stated, "at this time, and engaged in war, should not accept principles that would question the appropriateness of her actions in seizing supplies bound for France and enemy goods on neutral ships, does not seem unusual to me." Overall, Jay did remarkably well to secure any treaty during such a time; and this alone indicates that the general attitude of the mother country towards her independent children was far from unfriendly.

Unfriendliness began with the new century, when Jefferson first came into power. He treated the British navigation laws as if they had been invented on purpose to wrong Americans, though they had been in force for a hundred and fifty years, and though they had been originally passed, at the zenith of Cromwell's career, by the only republican government that ever held sway in England. Jefferson said that British policy was so perverse, that when he wished to forecast the British line of action on any particular point he would first consider what it ought to be and then infer the opposite. His official opinion was written in the following words: 'It is not to the moderation or justice of others we are to trust for fair and equal access to market with our productions, or for our due share in the transportation of them; but to our own means of independence, and the firm will to use them.' On the subject of impressment, or 'Sailors' Rights,' he was clearer still: 'The simplest rule will be that the vessel being American shall be evidence that the seamen on board of her are such.' This would have prevented the impressment of British seamen, even in British harbours, if they were under the American merchant flag—a principle almost as preposterous, at that particular time, as Jefferson's suggestion that the whole Gulf Stream should be claimed 'as of our waters.'

Unfriendliness started with the new century when Jefferson first took office. He viewed the British navigation laws as if they were purposely designed to harm Americans, even though they had been in place for a hundred and fifty years and were originally enacted during Cromwell's rule by the only republican government in England's history. Jefferson claimed that British policy was so twisted that when he wanted to predict the British response on any issue, he would first consider what it should be and then assume the opposite. He stated officially: 'It is not to the moderation or justice of others that we should rely on for fair and equal access to markets for our products, or for our fair share in their transportation; rather, it is up to our own means of independence and our strong will to use them.' Regarding impressment or 'Sailors' Rights,' he was even clearer: 'The easiest rule will be that if a vessel is American, that will prove that the seamen on board are American too.' This would have stopped the impressment of British sailors, even in British ports, as long as they were under the American merchant flag—a concept that was nearly as ridiculous at that time as Jefferson's idea that the entire Gulf Stream should be claimed 'as our waters.'

If Jefferson had been backed by a united public, or if his actions had been suited to his words, war would have certainly broken out during his second presidential term, which lasted from 1805 to 1809. But he was a party man, with many political opponents, and without unquestioning support from all on his own side, and he cordially hated armies, navies, and even a mercantile marine. His idea of an American Utopia was a commonwealth with plenty of commerce, but no more shipping than could be helped:

If Jefferson had the support of a united public, or if his actions matched his words, war would have definitely started during his second presidential term from 1805 to 1809. However, he was a party man with many political rivals and lacked unwavering support from his own side. He also had a strong dislike for armies, navies, and even a merchant marine. His vision of an American Utopia was a society with lots of commerce, but minimal shipping as much as possible:

   I trust [he said] that the good sense of our country
   will see that its greatest prosperity depends on a
   due balance between agriculture, manufactures, and
   commerce; and not on this protuberant navigation,
   which has kept us in hot water since the commencement
   of our government... It is essentially necessary for
   us to have shipping and seamen enough to carry our
   surplus products to market, but beyond that I do not
   think we are bound to give it encouragement... This
   exuberant commerce brings us into collision with other
   Powers in every sea.
I believe, he said, that the common sense of our country will recognize that our greatest prosperity relies on a proper balance among agriculture, manufacturing, and trade, and not on this excessive shipping, which has caused us trouble since our government started. It's important for us to have enough ships and sailors to take our surplus goods to market, but I don't think we need to promote it any further. This rampant trade puts us in conflict with other nations on every ocean.

Notwithstanding such opinions, Jefferson stood firm on the question of 'Sailors' Rights.' He refused to approve a treaty that had been signed on the last day of 1806 by his four commissioners in London, chiefly because it provided no precise guarantee against impressment. The British ministers had offered, and had sincerely meant, to respect all American rights, to issue special instructions against molesting American citizens under any circumstances, and to redress every case of wrong. But, with a united nation behind them and an implacable enemy in front, they could not possibly give up the right to take British seamen from neutral vessels which were sailing the high seas. The Right of Search was the acknowledged law of nations all round the world; and surrender on this point meant death to the Empire they were bound to guard.

Despite such opinions, Jefferson remained steadfast on the issue of 'Sailors' Rights.' He refused to approve a treaty that had been signed on the last day of 1806 by his four commissioners in London, mainly because it didn’t provide a clear guarantee against impressment. The British ministers had offered, and genuinely intended, to respect all American rights, issue specific instructions against bothering American citizens under any circumstances, and rectify every wrong. However, with a united nation supporting them and an unyielding enemy in front, they simply could not give up the right to take British sailors from neutral ships sailing the high seas. The Right of Search was the recognized law of nations around the globe; surrendering on this point would mean the end of the Empire they were obligated to protect.

Their 'no surrender' on this vital point was, of course, anathema to Jefferson. Yet he would not go beyond verbal fulminations. In the following year, however, he was nearly forced to draw the sword by one of those incidents that will happen during strained relations. In June 1807 two French men-of-war were lying off Annapolis, a hundred miles up Chesapeake Bay. Far down the bay, in Hampton Roads, the American frigate Chesapeake was fitting out for sea. Twelve miles below her anchorage a small British squadron lay just within Cape Henry, waiting to follow the Frenchmen out beyond the three-mile limit. As Jefferson quite justly said, this squadron was 'enjoying the hospitality of the United States.' Presently the Chesapeake got under way; whereupon the British frigate Leopard made sail and cleared the land ahead of her. Ten miles out the Leopard hailed her, and sent an officer aboard to show the American commodore the orders from Admiral Berkeley at Halifax. These orders named certain British deserters as being among the Chesapeake's crew. The American commodore refused to allow a search; but submitted after a fight, during which he lost twenty-one men killed and wounded. Four men were then seized. One was hanged; another died; and the other two were subsequently returned with the apologies of the British government.

Their 'no surrender' on this crucial issue was, of course, unacceptable to Jefferson. Yet, he didn't go beyond strong words. The following year, however, he was nearly forced to take military action due to one of those incidents that can arise during tense relations. In June 1807, two French warships were anchored off Annapolis, a hundred miles up Chesapeake Bay. Down the bay, in Hampton Roads, the American frigate Chesapeake was preparing to leave for sea. Twelve miles below her anchorage, a small British squadron was positioned just inside Cape Henry, ready to chase the French ships beyond the three-mile limit. As Jefferson rightly pointed out, this squadron was 'enjoying the hospitality of the United States.' Soon after, the Chesapeake set sail; at that point, the British frigate Leopard hoisted its sails and moved to intercept her. Ten miles out, the Leopard signaled her and sent an officer aboard to present the American commodore with orders from Admiral Berkeley at Halifax. These orders identified certain British deserters as being members of the Chesapeake's crew. The American commodore refused to allow a search but eventually relented after a struggle, during which he lost twenty-one men killed and wounded. Four men were then captured. One was hanged; another died; and the other two were later returned with apologies from the British government.

James Monroe, of Monroe Doctrine fame, was then American minister in London. Canning, the British foreign minister, who heard the news first, wrote an apology on the spot, and promised to make 'prompt and effectual reparation' if Berkeley had been wrong. Berkeley was wrong. The Right of Search did not include the right to search a foreign man-of-war, though, unlike the modern 'right of search,' which is confined to cargoes, it did include the right to search a neutral merchantman on the high seas for any 'national' who was 'wanted.' Canning, however, distinctly stated that the men's nationality would affect the consideration of restoring them or not. Monroe now had a good case. But he made the fatal mistake of writing officially to Canning before he knew the details, and, worse still, of diluting his argument with other complaints which had nothing to do with the affair itself. The result was a long and involved correspondence, a tardy and ungracious reparation, and much justifiable resentment on the American side.

James Monroe, known for the Monroe Doctrine, was the American minister in London at the time. Canning, the British foreign minister, heard the news first and quickly wrote an apology, promising to make "prompt and effective reparation" if Berkeley was in the wrong. Berkeley was indeed wrong. The Right of Search did not allow for searching a foreign warship, though, unlike today's "right of search," which only applies to cargoes, it did allow for searching a neutral merchant ship on the high seas for any "national" who was "wanted." However, Canning clearly stated that the nationality of the men would influence the decision on whether to return them or not. Monroe had a solid case now. However, he made the big mistake of writing to Canning officially before knowing all the details and, even worse, he diluted his argument with unrelated complaints. This led to a complicated and drawn-out correspondence, a slow and ungracious reparation, and considerable understandable resentment on the American side.

Unfriendliness soon became Hostility after the Chesapeake affair had sharpened the sting of the Orders-in-Council, which had been issued at the beginning of the same year, 1807. These celebrated Orders simply meant that so long as Napoleon tried to blockade the British Isles by enforcing his Berlin Decree, just so long would the British Navy be employed in blockading him and his allies. Such decisive action, of course, brought neutral shipping more than ever under the power of the British Navy, which commanded all the seaways to the ports of Europe. It accentuated the differences between the American and British governments, and threw the shadow of the coming storm over the exposed colony of Canada.

Unfriendliness quickly turned into Hostility after the Chesapeake incident intensified the impact of the Orders-in-Council, which had been issued earlier in 1807. These well-known Orders meant that as long as Napoleon attempted to blockade the British Isles with his Berlin Decree, the British Navy would be busy blockading him and his allies. This strong action, of course, placed neutral shipping even more firmly under the authority of the British Navy, which controlled all the shipping routes to European ports. It highlighted the growing tensions between the American and British governments and cast a shadow over the vulnerable colony of Canada, foreshadowing the coming conflict.

Not having succeeded in his struggle for 'Sailors' Rights,' Jefferson now took up the cudgels for 'Free Trade'; but still without a resort to arms. His chosen means of warfare was an Embargo Act, forbidding the departure of vessels from United States ports. This, although nominally aimed against France as well, was designed to make Great Britain submit by cutting off both her and her colonies from all intercourse with the United States. But its actual effect was to hurt Americans, and even Jefferson's own party, far more than it hurt the British. The Yankee skipper already had two blockades against 'Free Trade.' The Embargo Act added a third. Of course it was evaded; and a good deal of shipping went from the United States and passed into Canadian ports under the Union Jack. Jefferson and his followers, however, persisted in taking their own way. So Canada gained from the embargo much of what the Americans were losing. Quebec and Halifax swarmed with contrabandists, who smuggled back return cargoes into the New England ports, which were Federalist in party allegiance, and only too ready to evade or defy the edicts of the Democratic administration. Jefferson had, it is true, the satisfaction of inflicting much temporary hardship on cotton-spinning Manchester. But the American cotton-growing South suffered even more.

Not having succeeded in his fight for 'Sailors' Rights,' Jefferson now took up the cause for 'Free Trade,' but still without resorting to arms. His chosen method of struggle was the Embargo Act, which prohibited vessels from leaving United States ports. While it was nominally aimed at France as well, it was primarily designed to force Great Britain to comply by cutting off both her and her colonies from all trade with the United States. However, its actual effect was to harm Americans, and even Jefferson's own party, much more than it hurt the British. The Yankee captain already faced two blockades against 'Free Trade.' The Embargo Act added a third. Naturally, it was evaded, and a lot of shipping went from the United States to Canadian ports under the Union Jack. Jefferson and his followers, however, continued to follow their own path. As a result, Canada benefited from the embargo by gaining much of what the Americans were losing. Quebec and Halifax were filled with smugglers, who brought back goods into New England ports, which were Federalist and willing to evade or ignore the Democratic administration's orders. Jefferson did have the satisfaction of causing temporary hardship for cotton-spinning Manchester, but the American cotton-growing South suffered even more.

The American claims of 'Free Trade and Sailors' Rights' were opposed by the British counter-claims of the Orders-in-Council and the Right of Search. But 'Down with the British' and 'On to Canada' were without exact equivalents on the other side. The British at home were a good deal irritated by so much unfriendliness and hostility behind them while they were engaged with Napoleon in front. Yet they could hardly be described as anti-American; and they certainly had no wish to fight, still less to conquer, the United States. Canada did contain an anti-American element in the United Empire Loyalists, whom the American Revolution had driven from their homes. But her general wish was to be left in peace. Failing that, she was prepared for defence.

The American demands for 'Free Trade and Sailors' Rights' were met with British responses like the Orders-in-Council and the Right of Search. However, slogans like 'Down with the British' and 'On to Canada' didn't have direct equivalents on the British side. Back home, the British were quite annoyed by the unfriendly and hostile sentiment directed at them while they were busy dealing with Napoleon. Still, they couldn't really be called anti-American, and they definitely didn't want to fight, let alone conquer, the United States. Canada had an anti-American faction among the United Empire Loyalists, who had been forced from their homes during the American Revolution. But overall, Canada mainly wanted to be left alone. If that wasn't possible, she was ready to defend herself.

Anti-British feeling probably animated at least two-thirds of the American people on every question that caused international friction; and the Jeffersonian Democrats, who were in power, were anti-British to a man. So strong was this feeling among them that they continued to side with France even when she was under the military despotism of Napoleon. He was the arch-enemy of England in Europe. They were the arch-enemy of England in America. This alone was enough to overcome their natural repugnance to his autocratic ways. Their position towards the British was such that they could not draw back from France, whose change of government had made her a more efficient anti-British friend. 'Let us unite with France and stand or fall together' was the cry the Democratic press repeated for years in different forms. It was strangely prophetic. Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1808 began its self-injurious career at the same time that the Peninsular War began to make the first injurious breach in Napoleon's Continental System. Madison's declaration of war in 1812 coincided with the opening of Napoleon's disastrous campaign in Russia.

Anti-British sentiment likely motivated at least two-thirds of the American people on every issue that created international tension, and the Jeffersonian Democrats, who were in power, were uniformly anti-British. This feeling was so strong among them that they continued to support France even when it was under Napoleon's military dictatorship. He was England's biggest enemy in Europe, and they were England's biggest enemy in America. This was enough for them to overlook their natural aversion to his authoritarian rule. Their stance toward the British was such that they couldn’t pull back from France, whose change in government had made it a more effective anti-British ally. "Let’s unite with France and either succeed or fail together" was the slogan the Democratic press echoed for years in various forms. It turned out to be oddly prophetic. Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1808 began its damaging course at the same time the Peninsular War started to make the first serious crack in Napoleon's Continental System. Madison’s declaration of war in 1812 coincided with the start of Napoleon's disastrous campaign in Russia.

The Federalists, the party in favour of peace with the British, included many of the men who had done most for Independence; and they were all, of course, above suspicion as patriotic Americans. But they were not unlike transatlantic, self-governing Englishmen. They had been alienated by the excesses of the French Revolution; and they could not condone the tyranny of Napoleon. They preferred American statesmen of the type of Washington and Hamilton to those of the type of Jefferson and Madison. And they were not inclined to be more anti-British than the occasion required. They were strongest in New England and New York. The Democrats were strongest throughout the South and in what was then the West. The Federalists had been in power during the Accommodation period. The Democrats began with Unfriendliness, continued with Hostility, and ended with War.

The Federalists, the party that supported peace with the British, included many key figures who had greatly contributed to Independence, and they were, of course, beyond suspicion as patriotic Americans. However, they were similar to self-governing Englishmen across the Atlantic. They had been turned off by the extremes of the French Revolution and could not accept Napoleon's tyranny. They preferred American leaders like Washington and Hamilton over those like Jefferson and Madison. They weren’t inclined to be more anti-British than necessary. They were strongest in New England and New York, while the Democrats had a stronger presence in the South and what was then the West. The Federalists had been in power during the Accommodation period. The Democrats started with Unfriendliness, progressed to Hostility, and ultimately ended in War.

The Federalists did not hesitate to speak their mind. Their loss of power had sharpened their tongues; and they were often no more generous to the Democrats and to France than the Democrats were to them and to the British. But, on the whole, they made for goodwill on both sides; as well as for a better understanding of each other's rights and difficulties; and so they made for peace. The general current, however, was against them, even before the Chesapeake affair; and several additional incidents helped to quicken it afterwards. In 1808 the toast of the President of the United States was received with hisses at a great public dinner in London, given to the leaders of the Spanish revolt against Napoleon by British admirers. In 1811 the British sloop-of-war Little Belt was overhauled by the American frigate President fifty miles off-shore and forced to strike, after losing thirty-two men and being reduced to a mere battered hulk. The vessels came into range after dark; the British seem to have fired first; and the Americans had the further excuse that they were still smarting under the Chesapeake affair. Then, in 1812, an Irish adventurer called Henry, who had been doing some secret-service work in the United States at the instance of the Canadian governor-general, sold the duplicates of his correspondence to President Madison. These were of little real importance; but they added fuel to the Democratic fire in Congress just when anti-British feeling was at its worst.

The Federalists didn’t hold back from expressing their opinions. Losing their power had sharpened their words, and they were often just as critical of the Democrats and France as the Democrats were of them and the British. However, overall, they fostered goodwill between the two sides and encouraged a better understanding of each other's rights and challenges, which contributed to peace. The general trend, though, was against them, even before the Chesapeake incident; and several more events intensified this feeling afterwards. In 1808, a toast to the President of the United States was met with boos at a large public dinner in London, held for the leaders of the Spanish revolt against Napoleon by British supporters. In 1811, the British sloop-of-war Little Belt was intercepted by the American frigate President, fifty miles off the coast, and forced to surrender after losing thirty-two men and becoming a damaged wreck. The ships came within range after dark; the British seemed to fire first; and the Americans had the additional justification that they were still feeling the effects of the Chesapeake incident. Then, in 1812, an Irish adventurer named Henry, who had been engaged in some secret work in the United States on behalf of the Canadian governor-general, sold copies of his correspondence to President Madison. These were not very significant; but they fueled the growing anti-British sentiment in Congress just when it was at its peak.

The fourth cause of war, the desire to conquer Canada, was by far the oldest of all. It was older than Independence, older even than the British conquest of Canada. In 1689 Peter Schuyler, mayor of Albany, and the acknowledged leader of the frontier districts, had set forth his 'Glorious Enterprize' for the conquest and annexation of New France. Phips's American invasion next year, carried out in complete independence of the home government, had been an utter failure. So had the second American invasion, led by Montgomery and Arnold during the Revolutionary War, nearly a century later. But the Americans had not forgotten their long desire; and the prospect of another war at once revived their hopes. They honestly believed that Canada would be much better off as an integral part of the United States than as a British colony; and most of them believed that Canadians thought so too. The lesson of the invasion of the 'Fourteenth Colony' during the Revolution had not been learnt. The alacrity with which Canadians had stood to arms after the Chesapeake affair was little heeded. And both the nature and the strength of the union between the colony and the Empire were almost entirely misunderstood.

The fourth reason for war, the desire to conquer Canada, was by far the oldest one. It predates Independence and even the British conquest of Canada. In 1689, Peter Schuyler, the mayor of Albany and the recognized leader of the frontier areas, proposed his 'Glorious Enterprize' for the conquest and annexation of New France. Phips's American invasion the following year, conducted completely independently of the home government, ended in total failure. So did the second American invasion, led by Montgomery and Arnold during the Revolutionary War, nearly a century later. However, Americans had not forgotten their long-standing desire, and the possibility of another war reignited their hopes. They genuinely believed that Canada would be far better off as a part of the United States rather than as a British colony, and most of them thought that Canadians felt the same way. They had not learned the lesson from the invasion of the 'Fourteenth Colony' during the Revolution. The eagerness with which Canadians took up arms after the Chesapeake incident was largely overlooked. Additionally, both the nature and strength of the connection between the colony and the Empire were mostly misunderstood.

Henry Clay, one of the most warlike of the Democrats, said: 'It is absurd to suppose that we will not succeed in our enterprise against the enemy's Provinces. I am not for stopping at Quebec or anywhere else; but I would take the whole continent from them, and ask them no favours. I wish never to see peace till we do. God has given us the power and the means. We are to blame if we do not use them.' Eustis, the American Secretary of War, said: 'We can take Canada without soldiers. We have only to send officers into the Provinces, and the people, disaffected towards their own Government, will rally round our standard.' And Jefferson summed it all up by prophesying that 'the acquisition of Canada this year, as far as the neighbourhood of Quebec, will be a mere matter of marching.' When the leaders talked like this, it was no wonder their followers thought that the long-cherished dream of a conquered Canada was at last about to come true.

Henry Clay, one of the most aggressive Democrats, said: 'It's ridiculous to think we won't succeed in our mission against the enemy's provinces. I'm not just aiming for Quebec or any other spot; I want to take the entire continent from them and not ask for any favors. I hope to see no peace until we accomplish that. God has given us the power and the means. It's our fault if we don’t use them.' Eustis, the American Secretary of War, stated: 'We can take Canada without having to send in troops. We just need to send officers into the provinces, and the people, who are unhappy with their own government, will gather around our flag.' And Jefferson summed it all up by predicting that 'acquiring Canada this year, at least near Quebec, will just be a matter of marching.' When the leaders spoke this way, it’s no surprise their followers believed that the long-held dream of conquering Canada was finally about to become a reality.










CHAPTER II — OPPOSING FORCES

An armed mob must be very big indeed before it has the slightest chance against a small but disciplined army.

An armed mob has to be really large to stand even a slight chance against a small but disciplined army.

So very obvious a statement might well be taken for granted in the history of any ordinary war. But '1812' was not an ordinary war. It was a sprawling and sporadic war; and it was waged over a vast territory by widely scattered and singularly heterogeneous forces on both sides. For this reason it is extremely difficult to view and understand as one connected whole. Partisan misrepresentation has never had a better chance. Americans have dwelt with justifiable pride on the frigate duels out at sea and the two flotilla battles on the Lakes. But they have usually forgotten that, though they won the naval battles, the British won the purely naval war. The mother-country British, on the other hand, have made too much of their one important victory at sea, have passed too lightly over the lessons of the other duels there, and have forgotten how long it took to sweep the Stars and Stripes away from the Atlantic. Canadians have, of course, devoted most attention to the British victories won in the frontier campaigns on land, which the other British have heeded too little and Americans have been only too anxious to forget. Finally, neither the Canadians, nor the mother-country British, nor yet the Americans, have often tried to take a comprehensive view of all the operations by land and sea together.

So obvious a statement might be taken for granted in the history of any regular war. But '1812' was not a regular war. It was a sprawling and random conflict; and it was fought over a vast area by widely scattered and uniquely diverse forces on both sides. For this reason, it’s extremely difficult to see and understand it as one connected whole. Partisan misrepresentation has never had a better opportunity. Americans have taken pride in the frigate duels at sea and the two flotilla battles on the Lakes. However, they often forget that while they won the naval battles, the British won the overall naval war. The British at home, on the other hand, have focused too much on their one significant victory at sea, overlooked the lessons from the other duels, and forgotten how long it took to remove the Stars and Stripes from the Atlantic. Canadians have naturally focused most on the British victories in the land campaigns on the frontier, which the British at home have paid too little attention to and that Americans have been all too eager to forget. Finally, neither the Canadians, nor the British at home, nor the Americans have often tried to take a comprehensive view of all the operations by land and sea together.

The character and numbers of the opposing forces have been even less considered and even more misunderstood. Militia victories have been freely claimed by both sides, in defiance of the fact that the regulars were the really decisive factor in every single victory won by either side, afloat or ashore. The popular notions about the numbers concerned are equally wrong. The totals were far greater than is generally known. Counting every man who ever appeared on either side, by land or sea, within the actual theatre of war, the united grand total reaches seven hundred thousand. This was most unevenly divided between the two opponents. The Americans had about 575,000, the British about 125,000. But such a striking difference in numbers was matched by an equally striking difference in discipline and training. The Americans had more than four times as many men. The British had more than four times as much discipline and training.

The character and numbers of the opposing forces have been even less considered and even more misunderstood. Both sides have freely claimed militia victories, ignoring the fact that the regulars were actually the decisive factor in every single victory won by either side, whether at sea or on land. Common perceptions about the numbers involved are also incorrect. The totals were much higher than is generally known. If you count every person who participated on either side, on land or at sea, within the actual theater of war, the total comes to seven hundred thousand. This was very unevenly split between the two sides. The Americans had about 575,000, while the British had about 125,000. However, such a striking difference in numbers was matched by an equally significant difference in discipline and training. The Americans had more than four times as many men, while the British had more than four times the discipline and training.

The forces on the American side were a small navy and a swarm of privateers, a small regular army, a few 'volunteers,' still fewer 'rangers,' and a vast conglomeration of raw militia. The British had a detachment from the greatest navy in the world, a very small 'Provincial Marine' on the Lakes and the St Lawrence, besides various little subsidiary services afloat, including privateers. Their army consisted of a very small but latterly much increased contingent of Imperial regulars, a few Canadian regulars, more Canadian militia, and a very few Indians. Let us pass all these forces in review.

The American side had a small navy and a mix of privateers, a limited regular army, a few "volunteers," even fewer "rangers," and a large group of inexperienced militia. The British had a detachment from the world's largest navy, a tiny "Provincial Marine" on the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River, along with several other small support services at sea, including privateers. Their army was made up of a very small but recently increased number of Imperial regulars, a few Canadian regulars, more Canadian militia, and just a handful of Indians. Let's take a look at all these forces.

The American Navy. During the Revolution the infant Navy had begun a career of brilliant promise; and Paul Jones had been a name to conjure with. British belittlement deprived him of his proper place in history; but he was really the founder of the regular Navy that fought so gallantly in '1812.' A tradition had been created and a service had been formed. Political opinion, however, discouraged proper growth. President Jefferson laid down the Democratic party's idea of naval policy in his first Inaugural. 'Beyond the small force which will probably be wanted for actual service in the Mediterranean, whatever annual sum you may think proper to appropriate to naval preparations would perhaps be better employed in providing those articles which may be kept without waste or consumption, and be in readiness when any exigence calls them into use. Progress has been made in providing materials for 74-gun ships.' [Footnote: A ship-of the-line, meaning a battleship or man-of war strong enough to take a position in the line of battle, was of a different minimum size at different periods. The tendency towards increase of size existed a century ago as well as to-day. 'Fourth-rates,' of 50 and 60 guns, dropped out of the line at the beginning of the Seven Years' War. In 1812 the 74-gun three-decker was the smallest man-of-war regularly used in the line of battle.] This 'progress' had been made in 1801. But in 1812, when Jefferson's disciple, Madison, formally declared war, not a single keel had been laid. Meanwhile, another idea of naval policy had been worked out into the ridiculous gunboat system. In 1807, during the crisis which followed the Berlin Decree, the Orders-in-Council, and the Chesapeake affair, Jefferson wrote to Thomas Paine: 'Believing, myself; that gunboats are the only water defence which can be useful to us, and protect us from the ruinous folly of a navy, I am pleased with everything which promises to improve them.' Whether 'improved' or not, these gunboats were found worse than useless as a substitute for 'the ruinous folly of a navy.' They failed egregiously to stop Jefferson's own countrymen from breaking his Embargo Act of 1808; and their weatherly qualities were so contemptible that they did not dare to lose sight of land without putting their guns in the hold. No wonder the practical men of the Navy called them 'Jeffs.'

The American Navy. During the Revolution, the young Navy started a promising journey, and Paul Jones became a name to remember. The British downplayed his significance, but he was actually the founder of the regular Navy that fought bravely in '1812.' A tradition was established, and a service was formed. However, political views discouraged proper growth. President Jefferson outlined the Democratic party's naval policy idea in his first Inaugural. 'Beyond the small force we will likely need for actual service in the Mediterranean, any annual amount you think is appropriate for naval preparations might be better spent on supplies that can be stored without waste and ready for use when needed. Progress has been made in providing materials for 74-gun ships.' [Footnote: A ship-of-the-line, meaning a battleship or man-of-war strong enough to take a position in the line of battle, had different minimum size requirements at various times. The trend towards larger ships existed a century ago just as it does today. 'Fourth-rates,' with 50 and 60 guns, were removed from the line at the start of the Seven Years' War. By 1812, the 74-gun three-decker was the smallest man-of-war regularly used in the line of battle.] This 'progress' had been noted in 1801. But by 1812, when Jefferson's successor, Madison, officially declared war, not a single keel had been laid. Meanwhile, another version of naval policy evolved into the absurd gunboat system. In 1807, during the crisis that followed the Berlin Decree, the Orders-in-Council, and the Chesapeake incident, Jefferson wrote to Thomas Paine: 'I believe that gunboats are our best defense and will protect us from the disastrous mistake of a navy, so I'm pleased with anything that promises to improve them.' Whether they were 'improved' or not, these gunboats turned out to be worse than useless as a replacement for 'the disastrous mistake of a navy.' They woefully failed to stop Jefferson’s own citizens from violating his Embargo Act of 1808, and their sailing capabilities were so poor that they couldn’t venture far from shore without putting their guns below deck. It’s no surprise that the practical-minded members of the Navy called them 'Jeffs.'

When President Madison summoned Congress in 1811 war was the main topic of debate. Yet all he had to say about the Navy was contained in twenty-seven lukewarm words. Congress followed the presidential lead. The momentous naval vote of 1812 provided for an expenditure of six hundred thousand dollars, which was to be spread over three consecutive years and strictly limited to buying timber. Then, on the outbreak of war, the government, consistent to the last, decided to lay up the whole of their sea-going navy lest it should be captured by the British.

When President Madison called Congress together in 1811, war was the main topic of discussion. However, he only had twenty-seven half-hearted words about the Navy. Congress followed his example. The significant naval vote of 1812 authorized spending six hundred thousand dollars, which would be spread over three years and strictly used for purchasing timber. Then, when the war broke out, the government, staying true to form, decided to mothball their entire sea-going navy to avoid it being captured by the British.

But this final indignity was more than the Navy could stand in silence. Some senior officers spoke their minds, and the party politicians gave way. The result was a series of victories which, of their own peculiar kind, have never been eclipsed. Not one American ship-of-the-line was ever afloat during the war; and only twenty-two frigates or smaller naval craft put out to sea. In addition, there were the three little flotillas on Lakes Erie, Ontario, and Champlain; and a few minor vessels elsewhere. All the crews together did not exceed ten thousand men, replacements included. Yet, even with these niggard means, the American Navy won the command of two lakes completely, held the command of the third in suspense, won every important duel out at sea, except the famous fight against the Shannon, inflicted serious loss on British sea-borne trade, and kept a greatly superior British naval force employed on constant and harassing duty.

But this final insult was more than the Navy could ignore. Some senior officers expressed their opinions, and the political party leaders conceded. The outcome was a series of victories that, in their own unique way, have never been surpassed. Not one American battleship was ever at sea during the war; only twenty-two frigates or smaller naval ships ventured out. Additionally, there were three small flotillas on Lakes Erie, Ontario, and Champlain, along with a few minor vessels elsewhere. All the crews together numbered no more than ten thousand men, including replacements. Yet, even with these limited resources, the American Navy gained complete control of two lakes, maintained control of a third in limbo, won every significant battle at sea except for the famous fight against the Shannon, severely disrupted British maritime trade, and kept a much stronger British naval force occupied with constant and difficult duties.

The American Privateers. Besides the little Navy, there were 526 privately owned vessels which were officially authorized to prey on the enemy's trade. These were manned by forty thousand excellent seamen and had the chance of plundering the richest sea-borne commerce in the world. They certainly harassed British commerce, even in its own home waters; and during the course of the war they captured no less than 1344 prizes. But they did practically nothing towards reducing the British fighting force afloat; and even at their own work of commerce-destroying they did less than one-third as much as the Navy in proportion to their numbers.

The American Privateers. Alongside the small Navy, there were 526 privately owned ships that were officially authorized to attack enemy trade. These were operated by forty thousand skilled sailors and had the opportunity to loot the richest maritime commerce in the world. They certainly disrupted British trade, even in its own waters; and throughout the war, they captured a total of 1,344 prizes. However, they did very little to decrease the British naval forces; and even in their mission to destroy commerce, they accomplished less than one-third of what the Navy did relative to their numbers.

The American Army. The Army had competed with the Navy for the lowest place in Jefferson's Inaugural of 1801. 'This is the only government where every man will meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern... A well-disciplined militia is our best reliance for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them.' The Army was then reduced to three thousand men. 'Such were the results of Mr Jefferson's low estimate of, or rather contempt for, the military character,' said General Winfield Scott, the best officer the United States produced between '1812' and the Civil War. In 1808 'an additional military force' was authorized. In January 1812, after war had been virtually decided on, the establishment was raised to thirty-five thousand. But in June, when war had been declared, less than a quarter of this total could be called effectives, and more than half were still wanting to complete.' The grand total of all American regulars, including those present with the colours on the outbreak of hostilities as well as those raised during the war, amounted to fifty-six thousand. Yet no general had six thousand actually in the firing line of any one engagement.

The American Army. The Army had been in competition with the Navy for the lowest spot in Jefferson's Inaugural of 1801. "This is the only government where every man will see invasions of public order as his personal responsibility... A well-trained militia is our best option for the early moments of war, until regular soldiers can take their place." At that time, the Army was reduced to three thousand men. "Such were the results of Mr. Jefferson's low opinion of, or rather disdain for, the military," said General Winfield Scott, the best officer the United States produced between 1812 and the Civil War. In 1808, "an additional military force" was approved. In January 1812, after war had nearly been decided, the force was increased to thirty-five thousand. But by June, when war was declared, fewer than a quarter of that number were ready for action, and more than half were still needed for completion. The total number of American regulars, including those present with their units at the start of hostilities as well as those raised during the war, reached fifty-six thousand. Yet no general had six thousand actually engaged in any one battle.

The United States Volunteers. Ten thousand volunteers were raised, from first to last. They differed from the regulars in being enlisted for shorter terms of service and in being generally allowed to elect their own regimental officers. Theoretically they were furnished in fixed quotas by the different States, according to population. They resembled the regulars in other respects, especially in being directly under Federal, not State, authority.

The United States Volunteers. A total of ten thousand volunteers were recruited from start to finish. They were different from the regular troops because they signed up for shorter service periods and were usually allowed to pick their own regimental officers. Ideally, they were provided in set quotas by the various States, based on their population. In many ways, they were similar to the regulars, especially since they were directly under Federal, not State, control.

The Rangers. Three thousand men with a real or supposed knowledge of backwoods life served in the war. They operated in groups and formed a very unequal force—good, bad, and indifferent. Some were under the Federal authority. Others belonged to the different States. As a distinct class they had no appreciable influence on the major results of the war.

The Rangers. Three thousand men with actual or assumed knowledge of wilderness survival served in the war. They worked in groups and made up a very unbalanced force—some were skilled, some were unskilled, and others were somewhere in between. Some were under Federal control, while others were affiliated with various States. As a separate group, they had little to no significant impact on the overall outcomes of the war.

The Militia. The vast bulk of the American forces, more than three-quarters of the grand total by land and sea, was made up of the militia belonging to the different States of the Union. These militiamen could not be moved outside of their respective States without State authority; and individual consent was also necessary to prolong a term of enlistment, even if the term should come to an end in the middle of a battle. Some enlisted for several months; others for no more than one. Very few had any military knowledge whatever; and most of the officers were no better trained than the men. The totals from all the different States amounted to 456,463. Not half of these ever got near the front; and not nearly half of those who did get there ever came into action at all. Except at New Orleans, where the conditions were quite abnormal, the militia never really helped to decide the issue of any battle, except, indeed, against their own army. 'The militia thereupon broke and fled' recurs with tiresome frequency in numberless dispatches. Yet the consequent charges of cowardice are nearly all unjust. The fellow-countrymen of those sailors who fought the American frigates so magnificently were no special kind of cowards. But, as a raw militia, they simply were to well-trained regulars what children are to men.

The Militia. The majority of the American forces, over three-quarters of the total land and sea assembly, consisted of the militias from the various States in the Union. These militiamen couldn't be deployed outside their own States without State approval; individual permission was also needed to extend an enlistment term, even if it ended during a battle. Some enlisted for several months, while others signed up for just one. Very few had any military experience at all, and most of the officers were just as untrained as the soldiers. The total number from all the different States was 456,463. Less than half ever saw combat, and not nearly half of those who did actually engaged in any fighting. Except for New Orleans, where the circumstances were quite unusual, the militia never really influenced the outcome of any battle, and often they turned against their own army. "The militia then broke and fled" appeared far too often in countless reports. However, the resulting accusations of cowardice are mostly unfounded. The fellow countrymen of those sailors who fought the American frigates so bravely were not particularly cowardly. Yet, as a fresh militia, they were simply to well-trained regulars what children are to adults.

American Non-Combatant Services. There were more than fifty thousand deaths reported on the American side; yet not ten thousand men were killed or mortally wounded in all the battles put together. The medical department, like the commissariat and transport, was only organized at the very last minute, even among the regulars, and then in a most haphazard way. Among the militia these indispensable branches of the service were never really organized at all.

American Non-Combatant Services. There were over fifty thousand reported deaths on the American side; however, fewer than ten thousand men were killed or fatally injured in all the battles combined. The medical department, similar to the supply and transport services, was only put together at the last moment, even among the regulars, and in a very disorganized manner. Among the militia, these essential branches of service were never truly organized at all.

Such disastrous shortcomings were not caused by any lack of national resources. The population o the United States was about eight millions, as against eighteen millions in the British Isles. Prosperity was general; at all events, up to the time that it was checked by Jefferson's Embargo Act. The finances were also thought to be most satisfactory. On the very eve of war the Secretary of the Treasury reported that the national debt had been reduced by forty-six million dollars since his party had come into power. Had this 'war party' spent those millions on its Army and Navy, the war itself might have had an ending more satisfactory to the United States.

Such disastrous shortcomings weren't due to a lack of national resources. The population of the United States was about eight million, compared to eighteen million in the British Isles. Prosperity was widespread; at least until it was interrupted by Jefferson's Embargo Act. The financial situation was also considered to be very good. Right before the war, the Secretary of the Treasury reported that the national debt had decreased by forty-six million dollars since his party took power. If this 'war party' had invested those millions in its Army and Navy, the war might have ended in a way that was more favorable for the United States.

Let us now review the forces on the British side.

Let’s now look at the forces on the British side.

The eighteen million people in the British Isles were naturally anxious to avoid war with the eight millions in the United States. They had enough on their hands as it was. The British Navy was being kept at a greater strength than ever before; though it was none too strong for the vast amount of work it had to do. The British Army was waging its greatest Peninsular campaign. All the other naval and military services of what was already a world-wide empire had to be maintained. One of the most momentous crises in the world's history was fast approaching; for Napoleon, arch-enemy of England and mightiest of modern conquerors, was marching on Russia with five hundred thousand men. Nor was this all. There were troubles at home as well as dangers abroad. The king had gone mad the year before. The prime minister had recently been assassinated. The strain of nearly twenty years of war was telling severely on the nation. It was no time to take on a new enemy, eight millions strong, especially one who supplied so many staple products during peace and threatened both the sea flank of the mother country and the land flank of Canada during war.

The eighteen million people in the British Isles were understandably eager to avoid conflict with the eight million in the United States. They already had enough to deal with. The British Navy was at its strongest ever, although it still struggled to handle the enormous workload. The British Army was engaged in its largest campaign in the Peninsula. All the other naval and military forces of what was already a global empire had to be supported. One of the most critical crises in world history was approaching quickly; Napoleon, the arch-enemy of England and the greatest of modern conquerors, was advancing into Russia with five hundred thousand troops. But that wasn't all. There were issues at home as well as threats abroad. The king had gone mad the previous year. The prime minister had recently been assassinated. The strain of nearly twenty years of war was taking a heavy toll on the nation. It was no time to take on a new enemy of eight million, particularly one that provided so many essential goods during peacetime and posed threats to both the naval and land borders of the mother country and Canada during wartime.

Canada was then little more than a long, weak line of settlements on the northern frontier of the United States. Counting in the Maritime Provinces, the population hardly exceeded five hundred thousand—as many people, altogether, as there were soldiers in one of Napoleon's armies, or Americans enlisted for service in this very war. Nearly two-thirds of this half-million were French Canadians in Lower Canada, now the province of Quebec. They were loyal to the British cause, knowing they could not live a French-Canadian life except within the British Empire. The population of Upper Canada, now Ontario, was less than a hundred thousand. The Anglo-Canadians in it were of two kinds: British immigrants and United Empire Loyalists, with sons and grandsons of each. Both kinds were loyal. But the 'U.E.L.'s' were anti-American through and through, especially in regard to the war-and-Democratic party then in power. They could therefore be depended on to fight to the last against an enemy who, having driven them into exile once, was now coming to wrest their second New-World home from its allegiance to the British crown. They and their descendants in all parts of Canada numbered more than half the Anglo-Canadian population in 1812. The few thousand Indians near the scene of action naturally sided with the British, who treated them better and dispossessed them less than the Americans did. The only detrimental part of the population was the twenty-five thousand Americans, who simply used Canada as a good ground for exploitation, and who would have preferred to see it under the Stars and Stripes, provided that the change put no restriction on their business opportunities.

Canada was mostly a long, weak line of settlements on the northern border of the United States. Including the Maritime Provinces, the population barely topped five hundred thousand—about as many people as there were soldiers in one of Napoleon's armies or Americans enlisted for this very war. Nearly two-thirds of this half million were French Canadians in Lower Canada, now the province of Quebec. They were loyal to the British cause, knowing they could only live a French-Canadian life within the British Empire. The population of Upper Canada, now Ontario, was under a hundred thousand. The Anglo-Canadians there were of two types: British immigrants and United Empire Loyalists, along with their sons and grandsons. Both groups were loyal, but the Loyalists were thoroughly anti-American, especially regarding the Democratic party in power at the time. They could be relied upon to fight to the last against an enemy who had already driven them into exile once and was now trying to take their second New World home from its loyalty to the British crown. They and their descendants across Canada made up more than half the Anglo-Canadian population in 1812. The few thousand Indigenous people near the action naturally sided with the British, who treated them better and dispossessed them less than the Americans did. The only negative part of the population was the twenty-five thousand Americans, who simply saw Canada as a good place for exploitation and would have preferred to see it under the Stars and Stripes, as long as that didn’t restrict their business opportunities.

The British Navy. About thirty thousand men of the British Navy, only a fifth of the whole service, appeared within the American theatre of war from first to last. This oldest and greatest of all navies had recently emerged triumphant from an age-long struggle for the command of the sea. But, partly because of its very numbers and vast heritage of fame, it was suffering acutely from several forms of weakness. Almost twenty years of continuous war, with dull blockades during the last seven, was enough to make any service 'go stale.' Owing to the enormous losses recruiting had become exceedingly and increasingly difficult, even compulsory recruiting by press-gang. At the same time, Nelson's victories had filled the ordinary run of naval men with an over-weening confidence in their own invincibility; and this over-confidence had become more than usually dangerous because of neglected gunnery and defective shipbuilding. The Admiralty had cut down the supply of practice ammunition and had allowed British ships to lag far behind those of other nations in material and design. The general inferiority of British shipbuilding was such an unwelcome truth to the British people that they would not believe it till the American frigates drove it home with shattering broadsides. But it was a very old truth, for all that. Nelson's captains, and those of still earlier wars, had always competed eagerly for the command of the better built French prizes, which they managed to take only because the superiority of their crews was great enough to overcome the inferiority of their ships. There was a different tale to tell when inferior British vessels with 'run-down' crews met superior American vessels with first-rate crews. In those days training and discipline were better in the American mercantile marine than in the British; and the American Navy, of course, shared in the national efficiency at sea. Thus, with cheap materials, good designs, and excellent seamen, the Americans started with great advantages over the British for single-ship actions; and it was some time before their small collection of ships succumbed to the grinding pressure of the regularly organized British fleet.

The British Navy. About thirty thousand men from the British Navy, just a fifth of the entire service, were involved in the American theater of war from beginning to end. This oldest and greatest of all navies had recently emerged victorious from a long struggle for control of the seas. However, partly due to its size and extensive history, it was experiencing significant weaknesses. Nearly twenty years of continuous warfare, including monotonous blockades in the last seven, were enough to make any service feel stagnant. Because of the massive losses, recruiting became exceptionally challenging, even with compulsory press-gangs. At the same time, Nelson's victories had given regular naval personnel an inflated sense of confidence in their own invincibility; this overconfidence became particularly dangerous due to neglected gunnery and poor shipbuilding. The Admiralty had reduced the supply of practice ammunition and allowed British ships to fall significantly behind those of other countries in quality and design. The general inferiority of British shipbuilding was such an unpleasant reality for the British people that they refused to accept it until American frigates made it undeniable with devastating attacks. Yet it was an age-old reality. Nelson's captains and those from even earlier conflicts had always eagerly competed for better-built French prizes, managing to capture them only because their crew's superiority was enough to overcome their ships' shortcomings. The story changed when underperforming British vessels with 'run-down' crews faced superior American vessels with well-trained crews. At that time, training and discipline in the American merchant marine were better than in the British; and the American Navy, of course, benefitted from the overall national effectiveness at sea. Therefore, with affordable materials, good designs, and excellent sailors, the Americans had a significant advantage over the British in one-on-one battles; and it took a while before their small fleet succumbed to the relentless pressure of the organized British fleet.

The Provincial Marine. Canada had a little local navy on the Lakes called the Provincial Marine. It dated from the Conquest, and had done good service again during the Revolution, especially in Carleton's victory over Arnold on Lake Champlain in 1776. It had not, however, been kept up as a proper naval force, but had been placed under the quartermaster-general's department of the Army, where it had been mostly degraded into a mere branch of the transport service. At one time the effective force had been reduced to 132 men; though many more were hurriedly added just before the war. Most of its senior officers were too old; and none of the juniors had enjoyed any real training for combatant duties. Still, many of the ships and men did well in the war, though they never formed a single properly organized squadron.

The Provincial Marine. Canada had a small local navy on the Lakes called the Provincial Marine. It started from the Conquest and had performed well again during the Revolution, especially in Carleton's victory over Arnold on Lake Champlain in 1776. However, it hadn’t been maintained as a proper naval force and had been placed under the quartermaster-general's department of the Army, where it had mostly become just a part of the transport service. At one point, the active force was reduced to 132 men, though many more were quickly added just before the war. Most of its senior officers were too old, and none of the junior ones had received any real training for combat duties. Nonetheless, many of the ships and men performed well in the war, even though they never formed a properly organized squadron.

British Privateers. Privateering was not a flourishing business in the mother country in 1812. Prime seamen were scarce, owing to the great number needed in the Navy and in the mercantile marine. Many, too, had deserted to get the higher wages paid in 'Yankees'—'dollars for shillings,' as the saying went. Besides, there was little foreign trade left to prey on. Canadian privateers did better. They were nearly all 'Bluenoses;' that is, they hailed from the Maritime Provinces. During the three campaigns the Court of Vice-Admiralty at Halifax issued letters of marque to forty-four privateers, which employed, including replacements, about three thousand men and reported over two hundred prizes.

British Privateers. Privateering wasn't a booming business in Britain in 1812. Skilled sailors were hard to find due to the high demand in the Navy and merchant ships. Many had also deserted to chase the better pay offered by 'Yankees'—'dollars for shillings,' as the saying went. Additionally, there was little foreign trade left to target. Canadian privateers fared better. Most of them were 'Bluenoses,' meaning they came from the Maritime Provinces. Throughout the three campaigns, the Court of Vice-Admiralty in Halifax issued letters of marque to forty-four privateers, which employed around three thousand men, including replacements, and reported over two hundred captures.

British Commissariat and Transport. Transport, of course, went chiefly by water. Reinforcements and supplies from the mother country came out under convoy, mostly in summer, to Quebec, where bulk was broken, and whence both men and goods were sent to the front. There were plenty of experts in Canada to move goods west in ordinary times. The best of all were the French-Canadian voyageurs who manned the boats of the Hudson's Bay and North-West Companies. But there were not enough of them to carry on the work of peace and war together. Great and skilful efforts, however, were made. Schooners, bateaux, boats, and canoes were all turned to good account. But the inland line of communications was desperately long and difficult to work. It was more than twelve hundred miles from Quebec to Amherstburg on the river Detroit, even by the shortest route.

British Commissariat and Transport. Transport primarily relied on water. Reinforcements and supplies from the home country were sent out under escort, mostly in summer, to Quebec, where they were unpacked, and from there, both personnel and goods were sent to the front lines. There were plenty of experts in Canada capable of moving goods west during normal times. The best were the French-Canadian voyageurs who operated the boats for the Hudson's Bay and North-West Companies. However, there weren't enough of them to handle both peacetime and wartime operations simultaneously. Significant and skillful efforts were made, though. Schooners, bateaux, boats, and canoes were all put to good use. Still, the inland lines of communication were extremely lengthy and challenging to manage. It was over twelve hundred miles from Quebec to Amherstburg on the Detroit River, even by the shortest route.

The British Army. The British Army, like the Navy, had to maintain an exacting world-wide service, besides large contingents in the field, on resources which had been severely strained by twenty years of war. It was represented in Canada by only a little over four thousand effective men when the war began. Reinforcements at first came slowly and in small numbers. In 1813 some foreign corps in British pay, like the Watteville and the Meuron regiments, came out. But in 1814 more than sixteen thousand men, mostly Peninsular veterans, arrived. Altogether, including every man present in any part of Canada during the whole war, there were over twenty-five thousand British regulars. In addition to these there were the troops invading the United States at Washington and Baltimore, with the reinforcements that joined them for the attack on New Orleans—in all, nearly nine thousand men. The grand total within the theatre of war was therefore about thirty-four thousand.

The British Army. The British Army, similar to the Navy, had to sustain a demanding global presence, in addition to having large forces deployed in the field, relying on resources that had been heavily stretched by two decades of war. When the war began, it had a little over four thousand effective soldiers in Canada. Initially, reinforcements arrived slowly and in small numbers. In 1813, some foreign units paid by Britain, like the Watteville and Meuron regiments, were deployed. However, in 1814, more than sixteen thousand men, mostly veterans from the Peninsular War, arrived. In total, counting every soldier present in Canada throughout the entire war, there were over twenty-five thousand British regulars. Alongside these forces were troops invading the United States at Washington and Baltimore, together with reinforcements that joined for the assault on New Orleans—amounting to nearly nine thousand men. Overall, the total number of troops in the theater of war was about thirty-four thousand.

The Canadian Regulars. The Canadian regulars were about four thousand strong. Another two thousand took the place of men who were lost to the service, making the total six thousand, from first to last. There were six corps raised for permanent service: the Royal Newfoundland Regiment, the New Brunswick Regiment, the Canadian Fencibles, the Royal Veterans, the Canadian Voltigeurs, and the Glengarry Light Infantry. The Glengarries were mostly Highland Roman Catholics who had settled Glengarry county on the Ottawa, where Ontario marches with Quebec. The Voltigeurs were French Canadians under a French-Canadian officer in the Imperial Army. In the other corps there were many United Empire Loyalists from the different provinces, including a good stiffening of old soldiers and their sons.

The Canadian Regulars. The Canadian regulars were about four thousand strong. Another two thousand replaced those who were lost to service, bringing the total to six thousand, from start to finish. Six corps were established for permanent service: the Royal Newfoundland Regiment, the New Brunswick Regiment, the Canadian Fencibles, the Royal Veterans, the Canadian Voltigeurs, and the Glengarry Light Infantry. The Glengarries were mostly Highland Roman Catholics who had settled in Glengarry County on the Ottawa, where Ontario meets Quebec. The Voltigeurs were French Canadians led by a French-Canadian officer in the Imperial Army. In the other corps, there were many United Empire Loyalists from various provinces, including a solid number of old soldiers and their sons.

The Canadian Embodied Militia. The Canadian militia by law comprised every able-bodied man except the few specially exempt, like the clergy and the judges. A hundred thousand adult males were liable for service. Various causes, however, combined to prevent half of these from getting under arms. Those who actually did duty were divided into 'Embodied' and 'Sedentary' corps. The embodied militia consisted of picked men, drafted for special service; and they often approximated so closely to the regulars in discipline and training that they may be classed, at the very least, as semi-regulars. Counting all those who passed into the special reserve during the war, as well as those who went to fill up the ranks after losses, there were nearly ten thousand of these highly trained, semi-regular militiamen engaged in the war.

The Canadian Embodied Militia. The Canadian militia by law included every able-bodied man, except for a few specific exemptions like clergy and judges. A hundred thousand adult men were eligible for service. However, various factors prevented about half of them from joining the fight. Those who did serve were divided into 'Embodied' and 'Sedentary' units. The embodied militia was made up of selected men drafted for special duties, and they often trained and disciplined to such a high standard that they could be considered, at the very least, semi-regulars. Including those who joined the special reserve during the war and those who filled the ranks after losses, there were nearly ten thousand of these well-trained, semi-regular militiamen involved in the war.

The Canadian Sedentary Militia. The 'Sedentaries' comprised the rest of the militia. The number under arms fluctuated greatly; so did the length of time on duty. There were never ten thousand employed at any one time all over the country. As a rule, the 'Sedentaries' did duty at the base, thus releasing the better trained men for service at the front. Many had the blood of soldiers in their veins; and nearly all had the priceless advantage of being kept in constant touch with regulars. A passionate devotion to the cause also helped them to acquire, sooner than most other men, both military knowledge and that true spirit of discipline which, after all, is nothing but self-sacrifice in its finest patriotic form.

The Canadian Sedentary Militia. The 'Sedentaries' made up the rest of the militia. The number available varied widely, as did the length of their service. There were never more than ten thousand active at any given time across the country. Typically, the 'Sedentaries' served at the base, allowing the better-trained soldiers to be deployed to the front lines. Many had a military background in their families, and almost all benefited from being in regular contact with professional soldiers. Their strong commitment to the cause helped them acquire military knowledge and develop a true sense of discipline, which ultimately is just self-sacrifice in its highest patriotic form.

The Indians. Nearly all the Indians sided with the British or else remained neutral. They were, however, a very uncertain force; and the total number that actually served at the front throughout the war certainly fell short of five thousand.

The Indians. Almost all the Indians supported the British or stayed neutral. However, they were a pretty unreliable force, and the total number that actually fought at the front during the entire war was definitely under five thousand.

This completes the estimate of the opposing forces-of the more than half a million Americans against the hundred and twenty-five thousand British; with these great odds entirely reversed whenever the comparison is made not between mere quantities of men but between their respective degrees of discipline and training.

This wraps up the estimate of the opposing forces—over half a million Americans against 125,000 British. These significant odds are completely flipped when comparing not just the number of men but also their respective levels of discipline and training.

But it does not complete the comparison between the available resources of the two opponents in one most important particular—finance. The Army Bill Act, passed at Quebec on August 1, 1812, was the greatest single financial event in the history of Canada. It was also full of political significance; for the parliament of Lower Canada was overwhelmingly French-Canadian. The million dollars authorized for issue, together with interest at six per cent, pledged that province to the equivalent of four years' revenue. The risk was no light one. But it was nobly run and well rewarded. These Army Bills were the first paper money in the whole New World that never lost face value for a day, that paid all their statutory interest, and that were finally redeemed at par. The denominations ran from one dollar up to four hundred dollars. Bills of one, two, three, and four dollars could always be cashed at the Army Bill Office in Quebec. After due notice the whole issue was redeemed in November 1816. A special feature well worth noting is the fact that Army Bills sometimes commanded a premium of five per cent over gold itself, because, being convertible into government bills of exchange on London, they were secure against any fluctuations in the price of bullion. A special comparison well worth making is that between their own remarkable stability and the equally remarkable instability of similar instruments of finance in the United States, where, after vainly trying to help the government through its difficulties, every bank outside of New England was forced to suspend specie payments in 1814, the year of the Great Blockade.

But it doesn’t fully compare the available resources of the two opponents in one crucial aspect—finance. The Army Bill Act, passed in Quebec on August 1, 1812, was the most significant financial event in Canada's history. It also had substantial political implications; the parliament of Lower Canada was predominantly French-Canadian. The million dollars authorized for issuance, plus six percent interest, committed that province to the equivalent of four years' revenue. The risk was considerable, but it was boldly taken and well rewarded. These Army Bills were the first paper money in the entire New World that retained its value every day, paid all their required interest, and were ultimately redeemed at face value. The denominations ranged from one dollar to four hundred dollars. Bills of one, two, three, and four dollars could always be cashed at the Army Bill Office in Quebec. After proper notice, the entire issue was redeemed in November 1816. A notable aspect is that Army Bills sometimes traded at a five percent premium over gold, because they could be converted into government bills of exchange on London, making them secure against any fluctuations in the price of bullion. A worthwhile comparison is their remarkable stability versus the significant instability of similar financial instruments in the United States, where, after unsuccessfully trying to support the government through its challenges, every bank outside of New England was forced to suspend specie payments in 1814, the year of the Great Blockade.










CHAPTER III — 1812: OFF TO THE FRONT

President Madison sent his message to Congress on the 1st of June and signed the resultant 'war bill' on the 18th following. Congress was as much divided as the nation on the question of peace or war. The vote in the House of Representatives was seventy-nine to forty-nine, while in the Senate it was nineteen to thirteen. The government itself was 'solid.' But it did little enough to make up for the lack of national whole-heartedness by any efficiency of its own. Madison was less zealous about the war than most of his party. He was no Pitt or Lincoln to ride the storm, but a respectable lawyer-politician, whose forte was writing arguments, not wielding his country's sword. Nor had he in his Cabinet a single statesman with a genius for making war. His war secretary, William Eustis, never grasped the military situation at all, and had to be replaced by John Armstrong after the egregious failures of the first campaign. During the war debate in June, Eustis was asked to report to Congress how many of the 'additional' twenty-five thousand men authorized in January had already been enlisted. The best answer he could make was a purely 'unofficial opinion' that the number was believed to exceed five thousand.

President Madison delivered his message to Congress on June 1st and signed the resulting 'war bill' on the 18th. Congress was just as divided as the nation on the issue of peace or war. The vote in the House of Representatives was seventy-nine to forty-nine, while in the Senate it was nineteen to thirteen. The government itself was 'solid.' However, it did little to compensate for the lack of national enthusiasm with any effectiveness of its own. Madison was less passionate about the war than most of his party. He was no Pitt or Lincoln to weather the storm, but rather a respectable lawyer-politician, whose strength was in crafting arguments, not leading his country's military. He also didn't have a single statesman in his Cabinet with a talent for waging war. His war secretary, William Eustis, never really understood the military situation and had to be replaced by John Armstrong after the significant failures of the first campaign. During the war debate in June, Eustis was asked to inform Congress how many of the 'additional' twenty-five thousand men authorized in January had already been enlisted. The best he could provide was a purely 'unofficial opinion' that the number was thought to be over five thousand.

The first move to the front was made by the Navy. Under very strong pressure the Cabinet had given up the original idea of putting the ships under a glass case; and four days after the declaration of war orders were sent to the senior naval officer, Commodore Rodgers, to 'protect our returning commerce' by scattering his ships about the American coast just where the British squadron at Halifax would be most likely to defeat them one by one. Happily for the United States, these orders were too late. Rodgers had already sailed. He was a man of action. His little squadron of three frigates, one sloop, and one brig lay in the port of New York, all ready waiting for the word. And when news of the declaration arrived, he sailed within the hour, and set out in pursuit of a British squadron that was convoying a fleet of merchantmen from the West Indies to England. He missed the convoy, which worked into Liverpool, Bristol, and London by getting to the north of him. But, for all that, his sudden dash into British waters with an active, concentrated squadron produced an excellent effect. The third day out the British frigate Belvidera met him and had to run for her life into Halifax. The news of this American squadron's being at large spread alarm all over the routes between Canada and the outside world. Rodgers turned south within a few hours' sail of the English Channel, turned west off Madeira, gave Halifax a wide berth, and reached Boston ten weeks out from Sandy Hook. 'We have been so completely occupied in looking out for Commodore Rodgers,' wrote a British naval officer, 'that we have taken very few prizes.' Even Madison was constrained to admit that this offensive move had had the defensive results he had hoped to reach in his own 'defensive' way. 'Our Trade has reached our ports, having been much favoured by a squadron under Commodore Rodgers.'

The first move to the front was made by the Navy. Facing strong pressure, the Cabinet abandoned the original plan of keeping the ships safe and, four days after the war was declared, sent orders to the senior naval officer, Commodore Rodgers, to "protect our returning commerce" by scattering his ships along the American coast where the British squadron at Halifax would likely pick them off one by one. Fortunately for the United States, these orders were too late. Rodgers had already set sail. He was a man of action. His small squadron of three frigates, one sloop, and one brig was in the port of New York, fully prepared and waiting for the call. When the news of the declaration came through, he set off within the hour, aiming to pursue a British squadron escorting a fleet of merchant ships from the West Indies to England. He missed the convoy, which made it to Liverpool, Bristol, and London by going north of him. Still, his sudden venture into British waters with an active, concentrated squadron had a significant impact. On the third day out, the British frigate Belvidera encountered him and had to flee for her life to Halifax. News of this American squadron being out there caused alarm throughout the routes between Canada and the outside world. Rodgers headed south, just a few hours' sail from the English Channel, turned west off Madeira, avoided Halifax, and arrived in Boston ten weeks after leaving Sandy Hook. "We have been so completely occupied in looking out for Commodore Rodgers," wrote a British naval officer, "that we have taken very few prizes." Even Madison had to acknowledge that this offensive move achieved the defensive results he hoped to attain with his own "defensive" strategy. "Our trade has reached our ports, having been greatly aided by a squadron under Commodore Rodgers."

The policy of squadron cruising was continued throughout the autumn and winter of 1812. There were no squadron battles. But there was unity of purpose; and British convoys were harassed all over the Atlantic till well on into the next year. During this period there were five famous duels, which have made the Constitution and the United States, the Hornet and the Wasp, four names to conjure with wherever the Stars and Stripes are flown. The Constitution fought the first, when she took the Guerriere in August, due east of Boston and south of Newfoundland. The Wasp won the second in September, by taking the Frolic half-way between Halifax and Bermuda. The United States won the third in October, by defeating the Macedonian south-west of Madeira. The Constitution won the fourth in December, off Bahia in Brazil, by defeating the Java. And the Hornet won the fifth in February, by taking the Peacock, off Demerara, on the coast of British Guiana.

The squadron cruising strategy continued throughout the fall and winter of 1812. There were no squadron battles, but there was a shared mission, and British convoys were targeted all across the Atlantic until well into the following year. During this time, there were five notable duels, which have made the Constitution and the United States, along with the Hornet and the Wasp, four names that are recognized wherever the Stars and Stripes are displayed. The Constitution fought the first duel when she captured the Guerriere in August, due east of Boston and south of Newfoundland. The Wasp won the second in September by capturing the Frolic halfway between Halifax and Bermuda. The United States claimed the third victory in October by defeating the Macedonian southwest of Madeira. The Constitution secured the fourth win in December, off Bahia in Brazil, by defeating the Java. Finally, the Hornet achieved the fifth victory in February by capturing the Peacock, off Demerara, on the coast of British Guiana.

This closed the first period of the war at sea. The British government had been so anxious to avoid war, and to patch up peace again after war had broken out, that they purposely refrained from putting forth their full available naval strength till 1813. At the same time, they would naturally have preferred victory to defeat; and the fact that most of the British Navy was engaged elsewhere, and that what was available was partly held in leash, by no means dims the glory of those four men-of-war which the Americans fought with so much bravery and skill, and with such well-deserved success. No wonder Wellington said peace with the United States would be worth having at any honourable price, 'if we could only take some of their damned frigates!' Peace was not to come for another eighteen months. But though the Americans won a few more duels out at sea, besides two annihilating flotilla victories on the Lakes, their coast was blockaded as completely as Napoleon's, once the British Navy had begun its concerted movements on a comprehensive scale. From that time forward the British began to win the naval war, although they won no battles and only one duel that has lived in history. This dramatic duel, fought between the Shannon and the Chesapeake on June 1, 1813, was not itself a more decisive victory for the British than previous frigate duels had been for the Americans. But it serves better than any other special event to mark the change from the first period, when the Americans roved the sea as conquerors, to the second, when they were gradually blockaded into utter impotence.

This ended the first phase of the naval war. The British government had been so eager to avoid conflict and to restore peace once war had started that they intentionally held back their full naval power until 1813. At the same time, they obviously would have preferred to win rather than lose; the fact that most of the British Navy was occupied elsewhere and that the forces available were partially restrained doesn't lessen the honor of those four warships that the Americans faced with such courage and skill, achieving well-deserved success. It's no surprise that Wellington said that peace with the United States would be worth any honorable price, “if we could only seize some of their damned frigates!” However, peace was still a year and a half away. While the Americans won a few more battles at sea and delivered two significant victories on the Lakes, their coast was blockaded just like Napoleon’s once the British Navy launched its organized efforts on a larger scale. From that point on, the British began to gain the upper hand in the naval battle, even though they didn't win any battles and only one duel that remains in history. This notable duel, fought between the Shannon and the Chesapeake on June 1, 1813, wasn't a more decisive victory for the British than earlier frigate battles had been for the Americans. But it better than any other event marks the transition from the first phase, when the Americans sailed the seas as victors, to the second phase, when they were gradually pushed into total powerlessness.

Having now followed the thread of naval events to a point beyond the other limits of this chapter, we must return to the American movements against the Canadian frontier and the British counter-movements intended to checkmate them.

Having now traced the course of naval events beyond the boundaries of this chapter, we must go back to the American actions against the Canadian border and the British responses aimed at countering them.

Quebec and Halifax, the two great Canadian seaports, were safe from immediate American attack; though Quebec was the ultimate objective of the Americans all through the war. But the frontier west of Quebec offered several tempting chances for a vigorous invasion, if the American naval and military forces could only be made to work together. The whole life of Canada there depended absolutely on her inland waterways. If the Americans could cut the line of the St Lawrence and Great Lakes at any critical point, the British would lose everything to the west of it; and there were several critical points of connection along this line. St Joseph's Island, commanding the straits between Lake Superior and Lake Huron, was a vital point of contact with all the Indians to the west. It was the British counterpoise to the American post at Michilimackinac, which commanded the straits between Lake Huron and Lake Michigan. Detroit commanded the waterway between Lake Huron and Lake Erie; while the command of the Niagara peninsula ensured the connection between Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. At the head of the St Lawrence, guarding the entrance to Lake Ontario, stood Kingston. Montreal was an important station midway between Kingston and Quebec, besides being an excellent base for an army thrown forward against the American frontier. Quebec was the general base from which all the British forces were directed and supplied.

Quebec and Halifax, the two major Canadian seaports, were safe from immediate American attack, although Quebec was the ultimate target for the Americans throughout the war. However, the frontier west of Quebec presented several tempting opportunities for a strong invasion, provided the American naval and military forces could coordinate effectively. The entire livelihood of Canada relied completely on its inland waterways. If the Americans could sever the line of the St. Lawrence and Great Lakes at any critical point, the British would lose everything west of that line; and there were several key points of connection along it. St. Joseph's Island, which controlled the straits between Lake Superior and Lake Huron, was a crucial link with all the Indigenous tribes to the west. It served as the British counterbalance to the American post at Michilimackinac, which controlled the straits between Lake Huron and Lake Michigan. Detroit controlled the waterway between Lake Huron and Lake Erie, while securing the Niagara peninsula guaranteed the connection between Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. At the head of the St. Lawrence, guarding the entrance to Lake Ontario, was Kingston. Montreal was an important location halfway between Kingston and Quebec, and it was also an excellent base for an army poised to push against the American frontier. Quebec was the central base from which all British forces were directed and supplied.

Quick work, by water and land together, was essential for American success before the winter, even if the Canadians were really so anxious to change their own flag for the Stars and Stripes. But the American government put the cart before the horse—the Army before the Navy—and weakened the military forces of invasion by dividing them into two independent commands. General Henry Dearborn was appointed commander-in-chief, but only with control over the north-eastern country, that is, New England and New York. Thirty years earlier Dearborn had served in the War of Independence as a junior officer; and he had been Jefferson's Secretary of War. Yet he was not much better trained as a leader than his raw men were as followers, and he was now sixty-one. He established his headquarters at Greenbush, nearly opposite Albany, so that he could advance on Montreal by the line of the Hudson, Lake Champlain, and the Richelieu. The intended advance, however, did not take place this year. Greenbush was rather a recruiting depot and camp of instruction than the base of an army in the field; and the actual campaign had hardly begun before the troops went into winter quarters. The commander of the north-western army was General William Hull. And his headquarters were to be Detroit, from which Upper Canada was to be quickly overrun without troubling about the co-operation of the Navy. Like Dearborn, Hull had served in the War of Independence. But he had been a civilian ever since; he was now fifty-nine; and his only apparent qualification was his having been governor of Michigan for seven years. Not until September, after two defeats on land, was Commodore Chauncey ordered 'to assume command of the naval force on Lakes Erie and Ontario, and use every exertion to obtain control of them this fall.' Even then Lake Champlain, an essential link both in the frontier system and on Dearborn's proposed line of march, was totally forgotten.

Quick action, by both land and sea, was crucial for American success before winter, even if the Canadians were really eager to swap their flag for the Stars and Stripes. But the American government messed things up—the Army came before the Navy—and weakened the invading forces by splitting them into two independent commands. General Henry Dearborn was named commander-in-chief, but he only had authority over the northeastern area, specifically New England and New York. Thirty years earlier, Dearborn had fought in the War of Independence as a junior officer and had served as Jefferson's Secretary of War. Yet, he was not much better trained as a leader than his inexperienced soldiers were as followers, and he was now sixty-one. He set up his headquarters at Greenbush, almost directly across from Albany, so he could move towards Montreal via the Hudson, Lake Champlain, and the Richelieu. However, the planned advance didn't happen that year. Greenbush functioned more as a recruiting center and training camp than a base for an army in the field; in fact, the campaign barely got underway before the troops settled into winter quarters. The commander of the northwestern army was General William Hull, whose headquarters were in Detroit, from where Upper Canada was supposed to be quickly taken without worrying about Navy support. Like Dearborn, Hull had also served in the War of Independence, but he had been a civilian ever since; he was now fifty-nine, and his only notable experience was being the governor of Michigan for seven years. Not until September, after two defeats on land, was Commodore Chauncey ordered to take command of the naval forces on Lakes Erie and Ontario, and to do everything possible to gain control of them that fall. Even then, Lake Champlain, a crucial link in the frontier system and on Dearborn's planned route, was completely ignored.

To complete the dispersion of force, Eustis forgot all about the military detachments at the western forts. Fort Dearborn (now Chicago) and Michilimackinac, important as points of connection with the western tribes, were left to the devices of their own inadequate garrisons. In 1801 Dearborn himself, Eustis's predecessor as Secretary of War, had recommended a peace strength of two hundred men at Michilimackinac, usually known as 'Mackinaw.' In 1812 there were not so many at Mackinaw and Chicago put together.

To finish spreading out the military force, Eustis completely overlooked the troops stationed at the western forts. Fort Dearborn (now Chicago) and Michilimackinac, crucial for connecting with the western tribes, were left to the care of their insufficient garrisons. In 1801, Dearborn, who was Eustis’s predecessor as Secretary of War, had suggested maintaining a peace force of two hundred men at Michilimackinac, often referred to as 'Mackinaw.' By 1812, there were not even that many soldiers combined at Mackinaw and Chicago.

It was not a promising outlook to an American military eye—the cart before the horse, the thick end of the wedge turned towards the enemy, three incompetent men giving disconnected orders on the northern frontier, and the western posts neglected. But Eustis was full of self-confidence. Hull was 'enthusing' his militiamen. And Dearborn was for the moment surpassing both, by proposing to 'operate, with effect, at the same moment, against Niagara, Kingston, and Montreal.'

It didn't look good to the American military—things were out of order, the wrong end of the wedge was aimed at the enemy, three ineffective men were giving jumbled orders on the northern border, and the western posts were being ignored. But Eustis was brimming with self-confidence. Hull was getting his militiamen excited. And for the time being, Dearborn was outdoing them both by suggesting to "launch effective operations simultaneously against Niagara, Kingston, and Montreal."

From the Canadian side the outlook was also dark enough to the trained eye; though not for the same reasons. The menace here was from an enemy whose general resources exceeded those in Canada by almost twenty to one. The silver lining to the cloud was the ubiquitous British Navy and the superior training and discipline of the various little military forces immediately available for defence.

From the Canadian side, the outlook was also pretty grim to the experienced eye, though not for the same reasons. The threat here came from an enemy whose overall resources were almost twenty times greater than those in Canada. The silver lining was the ever-present British Navy and the better training and discipline of the various small military forces that were ready for defense.

The Maritime Provinces formed a subordinate command, based on the strong naval station of Halifax, where a regular garrison was always maintained by the Imperial government. They were never invaded, or even seriously threatened. It was only in 1814 that they came directly into the scene of action, and then only as the base from which the invasion of Maine was carried out.

The Maritime Provinces established a subordinate command centered around the strong naval base in Halifax, which always had a regular garrison maintained by the Imperial government. They were never invaded or seriously threatened. It wasn't until 1814 that they were directly involved in the action, and even then, it was only as the launch point for the invasion of Maine.

We must therefore turn to Quebec as the real centre of Canadian defence, which, indeed, it was best fitted to be, not only from its strategical situation, but from the fact that it was the seat of the governor-general and commander-in-chief, Sir George Prevost. Like Sir John Sherbrooke, the governor of Nova Scotia, Prevost was a professional soldier with an unblemished record in the Army. But, though naturally anxious to do well, and though very suavely diplomatic, he was not the man, as we shall often see, either to face a military crisis or to stop the Americans from stealing marches on him by negotiation. On the outbreak of war he was at headquarters in Quebec, dividing his time between his civil and military duties, greatly concerned with international diplomacy, and always full of caution.

We need to look to Quebec as the main hub of Canadian defense, which it was really suited for, not just because of its strategic location but also because it was home to the governor-general and commander-in-chief, Sir George Prevost. Like Sir John Sherbrooke, the governor of Nova Scotia, Prevost was a professional soldier with a spotless record in the Army. However, even though he naturally wanted to perform well and was very diplomatically smooth, he was not the right person, as we will often see, to handle a military crisis or to prevent the Americans from making unexpected moves through negotiation. When the war broke out, he was at headquarters in Quebec, splitting his time between his civil and military responsibilities, deeply concerned with international diplomacy and always very cautious.

At York (now Toronto) in Upper Canada a very different man was meanwhile preparing to checkmate Hull's 'north-western army' of Americans, which was threatening to invade the province. Isaac Brock was not only a soldier born and bred, but, alone among the leaders on either side, he had the priceless gift of genius. He was now forty-two, having been born in Guernsey on October 6, 1769, in the same year as Napoleon and Wellington. Like the Wolfes and the Montcalms, the Brocks had followed the noble profession of arms for many generations. Nor were the De Lisles, his mother's family, less distinguished for the number of soldiers and sailors they had been giving to England ever since the Norman Conquest. Brock himself, when only twenty-nine, had commanded the 49th Foot in Holland under Sir John Moore, the future hero of Corunna, and Sir Ralph Abercromby, who was so soon to fall victorious in Egypt. Two years after this he had stood beside another and still greater man at Copenhagen, 'mighty Nelson,' who there gave a striking instance of how a subordinate inspired by genius can win the day by disregarding the over-caution of a commonplace superior. We may be sure that when Nelson turned his blind eye on Parker's signal of recall the lesson was not thrown away on Brock.

At York (now Toronto) in Upper Canada, a very different man was getting ready to counter Hull's 'north-western army' of Americans, which posed a threat to invade the province. Isaac Brock wasn't just a soldier by training; he was, uniquely among the leaders on either side, gifted with true genius. At forty-two, he was born in Guernsey on October 6, 1769, the same year as Napoleon and Wellington. Like the Wolfes and Montcalms, the Brocks had a long tradition of serving in the military. The De Lisles, his mother's family, were also notable for their contributions of soldiers and sailors to England since the Norman Conquest. By the age of twenty-nine, Brock had already commanded the 49th Foot in Holland under Sir John Moore, the future hero of Corunna, and Sir Ralph Abercromby, who soon would achieve victory in Egypt. Two years later, he stood beside another legendary figure in Copenhagen, 'mighty Nelson,' who provided an unforgettable example of how a subordinate driven by genius can succeed by ignoring the excessive caution of a typical superior. It's safe to say that when Nelson ignored Parker's recall signal, Brock took the lesson to heart.

For ten long years of inglorious peace Brock had now been serving on in Canada, while his comrades in arms were winning distinction on the battlefields of Europe. This was partly due to his own excellence: he was too good a man to be spared after his first five years were up in 1807; for the era of American hostility had then begun. He had always been observant. But after 1807 he had redoubled his efforts to 'learn Canada,' and learn her thoroughly. People and natural resources, products and means of transport, armed strength on both sides of the line and the best plan of defence, all were studied with unremitting zeal. In 1811 he became the acting lieutenant-governor and commander of the forces in Upper Canada, where he soon found out that the members of parliament returned by the 'American vote' were bent on thwarting every effort he could make to prepare the province against the impending storm. In 1812, on the very day he heard that war had been declared, he wished to strike the unready Americans hard and instantly at one of their three accessible points of assembly-Fort Niagara, at the upper end of Lake Ontario, opposite Fort George, which stood on the other side of the Niagara river; Sackett's Harbour, at the lower end of Lake Ontario, thirty-six miles from Kingston; and Ogdensburg, on the upper St Lawrence, opposite Fort Prescott. But Sir George Prevost, the governor-general, was averse from an open act of war against the Northern States, because they were hostile to Napoleon and in favour of maintaining peace with the British; while Brock himself was soon turned from this purpose by news of Hull's American invasion farther west, as well as by the necessity of assembling his own thwarting little parliament at York.

For ten long years of boring peace, Brock had been stationed in Canada while his fellow soldiers were earning recognition on the battlefields of Europe. This was partly because he was too capable; he was too valuable to be released after his first five years in 1807, since the era of American hostility had begun. He had always been observant, but after 1807, he intensified his efforts to learn about Canada and fully understand it. He studied its people and natural resources, products and transport methods, military strength on both sides of the border, and the best defense strategies with relentless dedication. In 1811, he became the acting lieutenant-governor and commander of the forces in Upper Canada, where he quickly realized that the parliament members elected by the "American vote" were determined to sabotage every effort he made to get the province ready for the looming conflict. In 1812, on the very day he heard that war had been declared, he wanted to hit the unprepared Americans hard and immediately at one of their three easy-to-reach gathering spots—Fort Niagara at the upper end of Lake Ontario, across from Fort George on the other side of the Niagara River; Sackett's Harbour at the lower end of Lake Ontario, thirty-six miles from Kingston; and Ogdensburg on the upper St. Lawrence, opposite Fort Prescott. However, Sir George Prevost, the governor-general, was against an open act of war against the Northern States, as they were opposed to Napoleon and favored peace with the British; meanwhile, Brock was soon diverted from his plan by news of Hull's American invasion further west and the need to assemble his own obstructive little parliament in York.

The nine days' session, from July 27 to August 5, yielded the indispensable supplies. But the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act, as a necessary war measure, was prevented by the disloyal minority, some of whom wished to see the British defeated and all of whom were ready to break their oath of allegiance whenever it suited them to do so. The patriotic majority, returned by the votes of United Empire Loyalists and all others who were British born and bred, issued an address that echoed the appeal made by Brock himself in the following words: 'We are engaged in an awful and eventful contest. By unanimity and despatch in our councils and by vigour in our operations we may teach the enemy this lesson: That a country defended by free men, enthusiastically devoted to the cause of their King and Constitution, can never be conquered.'

The nine-day session, from July 27 to August 5, provided the essential supplies. However, the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act, deemed necessary for the war, was blocked by a disloyal minority, some of whom wanted to see the British lose, and all of whom were willing to ignore their oath of allegiance whenever it was convenient. The patriotic majority, backed by the votes of United Empire Loyalists and others who were born and raised British, issued a statement that echoed Brock’s call: 'We are in a serious and significant struggle. By working together quickly and effectively, we can show the enemy this lesson: A country defended by free people, passionately committed to their King and Constitution, can never be defeated.'

On August 5, being at last clear of his immediate duties as a civil governor, Brock threw himself ardently into the work of defeating Hull, who had crossed over into Canada from Detroit on July 11 and issued a proclamation at Sandwich the following day. This proclamation shows admirably the sort of impression which the invaders wished to produce on Canadians.

On August 5, finally free from his immediate responsibilities as a civil governor, Brock eagerly focused on the task of defeating Hull, who had entered Canada from Detroit on July 11 and released a proclamation at Sandwich the next day. This proclamation effectively illustrates the kind of impression the invaders wanted to create on Canadians.

   The United States are sufficiently powerful to afford
   you every security consistent with their rights and
   your expectations. I tender you the invaluable blessings
   of Civil, Political, and Religious Liberty... The
   arrival of an army of Friends must be hailed by you
   with a cordial welcome. You will be emancipated from
   Tyranny and Oppression and restored to the dignified
   station of Freemen... If, contrary to your own interest
   and the just expectation of my country, you should
   take part in the approaching contest, you will be
   considered and treated as enemies and the horrors and
   calamities of war will Stalk before you. If the
   barbarous and Savage policy of Great Britain be pursued,
   and the savages let loose to murder our Citizens and
   butcher our women and children, this war will be a
   war of extermination. The first stroke with the
   Tomahawk, the first attempt with the Scalping Knife,
   will be the Signal for one indiscriminate scene of
   desolation. No white man found fighting by the Side
   of an Indian will be taken prisoner. Instant destruction
   will be his Lot...
   The United States is strong enough to provide you with all the security that aligns with your rights and expectations. I offer you the priceless benefits of Civil, Political, and Religious Liberty... The arrival of a friendly army should be met with a warm welcome. You will be freed from Tyranny and Oppression and returned to the respected status of Free People... If, against your own interests and the rightful hopes of my country, you choose to participate in the upcoming conflict, you will be seen and treated as enemies, and the horrors of war will be upon you. If Great Britain's cruel and savage tactics continue, unleashing violence against our Citizens and attacking our women and children, this will be a war of total destruction. The first blow with the Tomahawk, the first use of the Scalping Knife, will mark the beginning of an unending scene of devastation. No white person fighting alongside an Indian will be taken prisoner. Instant destruction will be their fate...

This was war with a vengeance. But Hull felt less confidence than his proclamation was intended to display. He knew that, while the American government had been warned in January about the necessity of securing the naval command of Lake Erie, no steps had yet been taken to secure it. Ever since the beginning of March, when he had written a report based on his seven years' experience as governor of Michigan, he had been gradually learning that Eustis was bent on acting in defiance of all sound military advice. In April he had accepted his new position very much against his will and better judgment. In May he had taken command of the assembling militiamen at Dayton in Ohio. In June he had been joined by a battalion of inexperienced regulars. And now, in July, he was already feeling the ill effects of having to carry on what should have been an amphibious campaign without the assistance of any proper force afloat; for on the 2nd ten days before he issued his proclamation at Sandwich, Lieutenant Rolette, an enterprising French-Canadian officer in the Provincial Marine, had cut his line of communication along the Detroit and had taken an American schooner which contained his official plan of campaign, besides a good deal of baggage and stores.

This was a war like never before. But Hull felt less confident than his proclamation suggested. He knew that, even though the American government had been warned back in January about the need to secure naval control of Lake Erie, no actions had been taken to ensure it. Since early March, when he had written a report based on his seven years as governor of Michigan, he had been gradually realizing that Eustis was determined to act against all reasonable military advice. In April, he had reluctantly accepted his new position, against his better judgment. In May, he took command of the assembled militiamen in Dayton, Ohio. By June, he was joined by a battalion of inexperienced regulars. And now, in July, he was already feeling the negative consequences of trying to carry out what should have been an amphibious campaign without any proper naval support; because on the 2nd, ten days before he issued his proclamation at Sandwich, Lieutenant Rolette, an enterprising French-Canadian officer in the Provincial Marine, had severed his line of communication along the Detroit River and captured an American schooner that held his official campaign plans, along with a lot of baggage and supplies.

There were barely six hundred British on the line of the Detroit when Hull first crossed over to Sandwich with twenty-five hundred men. These six hundred comprised less than 150 regulars, about 300 militia, and some 150 Indians. Yet Hull made no decisive effort against the feeble little fort of Malden, which was the only defence of Amherstburg by land. The distance was nothing, only twelve miles south from Sandwich. He sent a sort of flying column against it. But this force went no farther than half-way, where the Americans were checked at the bridge over the swampy little Riviere aux Canards by the Indians under Tecumseh, the great War Chief of whom we shall soon hear more.

There were barely six hundred British on the line of the Detroit when Hull first crossed over to Sandwich with twenty-five hundred men. These six hundred included fewer than 150 regulars, about 300 militia, and around 150 Indians. Yet Hull made no real attempt to take the weak little fort of Malden, which was the only defense of Amherstburg by land. The distance was minimal, just twelve miles south from Sandwich. He sent a sort of quick strike force against it. However, this group didn’t get further than halfway, where the Americans were stopped at the bridge over the swampy little Riviere aux Canards by the Indians led by Tecumseh, the great War Chief of whom we will soon hear more.

Hull's failure to take Fort Malden was one fatal mistake. His failure to secure his communications southward from Detroit was another. Apparently yielding to the prevalent American idea that a safe base could be created among friendly Canadians without the trouble of a regular campaign, he sent off raiding parties up the Thames. According to his own account, these parties 'penetrated sixty miles into the settled part of the province.' According to Brock, they 'ravaged the country as far as the Moravian Town.' But they gained no permanent foothold. By the beginning of August Hull's position had already become precarious. The Canadians had not proved friendly. The raid up the Thames and the advance towards Amherstburg had both failed. And the first British reinforcements had already begun to arrive. These were very small. But even a few good regulars helped to discourage Hull; and the new British commander, Colonel Procter of the 41st, was not yet to be faced by a task beyond his strength. Worse yet for the Americans, Brock might soon be expected from the east; the Provincial Marine still held the water line of communication from the south; and dire news had just come in from the west.

Hull's failure to capture Fort Malden was one major mistake. His inability to secure communications south from Detroit was another. Apparently succumbing to the common American belief that a secure base could be established among friendly Canadians without the effort of a proper campaign, he sent raiding parties up the Thames. According to his own account, these groups "penetrated sixty miles into the settled part of the province." According to Brock, they “ravaged the country as far as the Moravian Town.” But they gained no lasting foothold. By early August, Hull's position had become unstable. The Canadians did not turn out to be friendly. The raid up the Thames and the push toward Amherstburg both failed. And the first British reinforcements had already started to arrive. These were quite small in number. But even a few good regulars discouraged Hull; and the new British commander, Colonel Procter of the 41st, was not yet faced with a task beyond his capacity. Even worse for the Americans, Brock could soon be expected from the east; the Provincial Marine still controlled the waterway of communication from the south; and troubling news had just come in from the west.

The moment Brock had heard of the declaration of war he had sent orders post-haste to Captain Roberts at St Joseph's Island, either to attack the Americans at Michilimackinac or stand on his own defence. Roberts received Brock's orders on the 15th of July. The very next day he started for Michilimackinac with 45 men of the Royal Veterans, 180 French-Canadian voyageurs, 400 Indians, and two 'unwieldy' iron six-pounders. Surprise was essential, to prevent the Americans from destroying their stores; and the distance was a good fifty miles. But 'by the almost unparalleled exertions of the Canadians who manned the boats, we arrived at the place of Rendezvous at 3 o'clock the following morning.' One of the iron six-pounders was then hauled up the heights, which rise to eight hundred feet, and trained on the dumbfounded Americans, while the whole British force took post for storming. The American commandant, Lieutenant Hanks, who had only fifty-seven effective men, thereupon surrendered without firing a shot.

The moment Brock heard about the declaration of war, he quickly sent orders to Captain Roberts at St. Joseph's Island to either attack the Americans at Michilimackinac or prepare to defend himself. Roberts received Brock's orders on July 15th. The very next day, he set off for Michilimackinac with 45 Royal Veterans, 180 French-Canadian voyageurs, 400 Indians, and two clunky iron six-pounders. Surprise was crucial to prevent the Americans from destroying their supplies, and the distance was about fifty miles. But thanks to the incredible efforts of the Canadians who manned the boats, we reached the rendezvous point at 3 o'clock the next morning. One of the iron six-pounders was then hauled up the heights, which rise to eight hundred feet, and aimed at the stunned Americans, while the entire British force prepared to launch an attack. The American commander, Lieutenant Hanks, who had only fifty-seven effective men, then surrendered without firing a shot.

The news of this bold stroke ran like wildfire through the whole North-West. The effect on the Indians was tremendous, immediate, and wholly in favour of the British. In the previous November Tecumseh's brother, known far and wide as the 'Prophet,' had been defeated on the banks of the Tippecanoe, a river of Indiana, by General Harrison, of whom we shall hear in the next campaign. This battle, though small in itself, was looked upon as the typical victory of the dispossessing Americans; so the British seizure of Michilimackinac was hailed with great joy as being a most effective counter-stroke. Nor was this the only reason for rejoicing. Michilimackinac and St Joseph's commanded the two lines of communication between the western wilds and the Great Lakes; so the possession of both by the British was more than a single victory, it was a promise of victories to come. No wonder Hull lamented this 'opening of the hive,' which 'let the swarms' loose all over the wilds on his inland flank and rear.

The news of this bold move spread like wildfire throughout the entire Northwest. The impact on the Native Americans was huge, immediate, and completely in favor of the British. The previous November, Tecumseh's brother, known widely as the 'Prophet,' had been defeated on the banks of the Tippecanoe, a river in Indiana, by General Harrison, who we will hear about in the next campaign. Although this battle was small, it was viewed as a typical victory for the dispossessing Americans; therefore, the British takeover of Michilimackinac was celebrated as a highly effective counterattack. That wasn't the only reason for celebration. Michilimackinac and St. Joseph's controlled the two major routes of communication between the western territories and the Great Lakes; so, British control of both was more than just a victory, it was a promise of more victories to come. It's no wonder Hull regretted this 'opening of the hive,' which 'let the swarms' loose all over the wilderness on his inland flank and rear.

He would have felt more uneasy still if he had known what was to happen when Captain Heald received his orders at Fort Dearborn (Chicago) on August 9. Hull had ordered Heald to evacuate the fort as soon as possible and rejoin headquarters. Heald had only sixty-six men, not nearly enough to overawe the surrounding Indians. News of the approaching evacuation spread quickly during the six days of preparation. The Americans failed to destroy the strong drink in the fort. The Indians got hold of it, became ungovernably drunk, and killed half of Heald's men before they had gone a mile. The rest surrendered and were spared. Heald and his wife were then sent to Mackinaw, where Roberts treated them very kindly and sent them on to Pittsburg. The whole affair was one between Indians and Americans alone. But it was naturally used by the war party to inflame American feeling against all things British.

He would have felt even more uneasy if he had known what was going to happen when Captain Heald received his orders at Fort Dearborn (Chicago) on August 9. Hull had ordered Heald to evacuate the fort as soon as possible and return to headquarters. Heald had only sixty-six men, which was nowhere near enough to intimidate the surrounding Indians. News of the upcoming evacuation spread quickly during the six days of preparation. The Americans failed to destroy the alcohol in the fort. The Indians got hold of it, became uncontrollably drunk, and killed half of Heald's men before they had gone a mile. The rest surrendered and were spared. Heald and his wife were then sent to Mackinaw, where Roberts treated them very kindly and sent them on to Pittsburgh. The whole incident was one between Indians and Americans alone. But it was naturally used by the war party to stoke American resentment against everything British.

While Hull was writing to Fort Dearborn and hearing bad news from Michilimackinac, he was also getting more and more anxious about his own communications to the south. With no safe base in Canada, and no safe line of transport by water from Lake Erie to the village of Detroit, he decided to clear the road which ran north and south beside the Detroit river. But this was now no easy task for his undisciplined forces, as Colonel Procter was bent on blocking the same road by sending troops and Indians across the river. On August 5, the day Brock prorogued his parliament at York, Tecumseh ambushed Hull's first detachment of two hundred men at Brownstown, eighteen miles south of Detroit. On the 7th Hull began to withdraw his forces from the Canadian side. On the 8th he ordered six hundred men to make a second attempt to clear the southern road. But on the 9th these men were met at Maguaga, only fourteen miles south of Detroit, by a mixed force of British-regulars, militia, and Indians. The superior numbers of the Americans enabled them to press the British back at first. But, on the 10th, when the British showed a firm front in a new position, the Americans retired discouraged. Next day Hull withdrew the last of his men from Canadian soil, exactly one month after they had first set foot upon it. The following day was spent in consulting his staff and trying to reorganize his now unruly militia. On the evening of the 13th he made his final effort to clear the one line left, by sending out four hundred picked men under his two best colonels, McArthur and Cass, who were ordered to make an inland detour through the woods.

While Hull was writing to Fort Dearborn and receiving bad news from Michilimackinac, he was getting increasingly worried about his communications to the south. With no secure base in Canada and no safe way to transport supplies by water from Lake Erie to Detroit, he decided to clear the road that ran north and south along the Detroit River. However, this was no easy task for his undisciplined troops, as Colonel Procter was determined to block the same route by sending soldiers and Native Americans across the river. On August 5, the day Brock postponed his parliament at York, Tecumseh ambushed Hull's first detachment of two hundred men at Brownstown, eighteen miles south of Detroit. On the 7th, Hull began to pull back his forces from the Canadian side. On the 8th, he ordered six hundred men to attempt a second clearance of the southern road. But on the 9th, these men encountered a mixed force of British regulars, militia, and Native Americans at Maguaga, only fourteen miles south of Detroit. The Americans initially used their superior numbers to push the British back. However, on the 10th, when the British took up a strong position, the Americans retreated, feeling disheartened. The next day, Hull evacuated the last of his men from Canadian soil, exactly one month after their initial arrival. The following day was spent consulting with his staff and trying to reorganize his unruly militia. On the evening of the 13th, he made one last attempt to clear the only remaining route by sending out four hundred selected men under his two best colonels, McArthur and Cass, who were directed to make an inland detour through the woods.

That same night Brock stepped ashore at Amherstburg.

That same night, Brock arrived at Amherstburg.










CHAPTER IV — 1812: BROCK AT DETROIT AND QUEENSTON HEIGHTS

The prorogation which released Brock from his parliamentary duties on August 5 had been followed by eight days of the most strenuous military work, especially on the part of the little reinforcement which he was taking west to Amherstburg. The Upper Canada militiamen, drawn from the United Empire Loyalists and from the British-born, had responded with hearty goodwill, all the way from Glengarry to Niagara. But the population was so scattered and equipment so scarce that no attempt had been made to have whole battalions of 'Select Embodied Militia' ready for the beginning of the war, as in the more thickly peopled province of Lower Canada. The best that could be done was to embody the two flank companies—the Light and Grenadier companies—of the most urgently needed battalions. But as these companies contained all the picked men who were readiest for immediate service, and as the Americans were very slow in mobilizing their own still more unready army, Brock found that, for the time being, York could be left and Detroit attacked with nothing more than his handful of regulars, backed by the flank-company militiamen and the Provincial Marine.

The prorogation that freed Brock from his parliamentary duties on August 5 was followed by eight days of intense military work, especially from the small reinforcements he was taking west to Amherstburg. The Upper Canada militiamen, made up of United Empire Loyalists and British-born individuals, responded with great enthusiasm, from Glengarry to Niagara. However, the population was so spread out and equipment so limited that no effort had been made to prepare entire battalions of 'Select Embodied Militia' for the start of the war, unlike the more densely populated province of Lower Canada. The best they could do was to assemble the two flank companies—the Light and Grenadier companies—of the most urgently needed battalions. But since these companies consisted of all the top men who were ready for immediate service, and since the Americans were very slow in mobilizing their own even less prepared army, Brock realized that, for the time being, York could be left alone and Detroit could be attacked with nothing more than his small group of regulars, supported by the flank-company militiamen and the Provincial Marine.

Leaving York the very day he closed the House there, Brock sailed over to Burlington Bay, marched across the neck of the Niagara peninsula, and embarked at Long Point with every man the boats could carry—three hundred, all told, forty regulars of the 41st and two hundred and sixty flank-company militiamen. Then, for the next five days, he fought his way, inch by inch, along the north shore of Lake Erie against a persistent westerly storm. The news by the way was discouraging. Hull's invasion had unsettled the Indians as far east as the Niagara peninsula, which the local militia were consequently afraid to leave defenceless. But once Brock reached the scene of action, his insight showed him what bold skill could do to turn the tide of feeling all along the western frontier.

Leaving York on the very day he closed the House there, Brock sailed over to Burlington Bay, marched across the neck of the Niagara peninsula, and boarded at Long Point with everyone the boats could carry—three hundred in total, including forty regulars from the 41st and two hundred and sixty militiamen from the flank companies. For the next five days, he fought his way, inch by inch, along the north shore of Lake Erie against a persistent westerly storm. The news along the way was discouraging. Hull's invasion had unsettled the Indians as far east as the Niagara peninsula, making the local militia afraid to leave it undefended. But once Brock reached the scene of action, his insight showed him what bold skill could do to change the mood all along the western frontier.

It was getting on for one o'clock in the morning of August 14 when Lieutenant Rolette challenged Brock's leading boat from aboard the Provincial Marine schooner General Hunter. As Brock stepped ashore he ordered all commanding officers to meet him within an hour. He then read Hull's dispatches, which had been taken by Rolette with the captured schooner and by Tecumseh at Brownstown. By two o'clock all the principal officers and Indian chiefs had assembled, not as a council of war, but simply to tell Brock everything they knew. Only Tecumseh and Colonel Nichol, the quartermaster of the little army, thought that Detroit itself could be attacked with any prospect of success. Brock listened attentively; made up his mind; told his officers to get ready for immediate attack; asked Tecumseh to assemble all the Indians at noon; and dismissed the meeting at four. Brock and Tecumseh read each other at a glance; and Tecumseh, turning to the tribal chiefs, said simply, 'This is a man,' a commendation approved by them all with laconic, deep 'Ho-ho's!'

It was almost one o'clock in the morning on August 14 when Lieutenant Rolette challenged Brock's lead boat from the Provincial Marine schooner General Hunter. As Brock stepped ashore, he ordered all commanding officers to meet him within an hour. He then read Hull's dispatches, which had been captured by Rolette along with the schooner and by Tecumseh at Brownstown. By two o'clock, all the main officers and Indian chiefs had gathered, not as a war council, but simply to share everything they knew. Only Tecumseh and Colonel Nichol, the quartermaster of the small army, believed that Detroit could be attacked successfully. Brock listened carefully; made up his mind; told his officers to prepare for an immediate attack; asked Tecumseh to gather all the Indians at noon; and dismissed the meeting at four. Brock and Tecumseh exchanged a knowing glance, and Tecumseh, turning to the tribal chiefs, simply said, 'This is a man,' a compliment that was met with their quiet, deep 'Ho-ho's!'

Tecumseh was the last great leader of the Indian race and perhaps the finest embodiment of all its better qualities. Like Pontiac, fifty years before, but in a nobler way, he tried to unite the Indians against the exterminating American advance. He was apparently on the eve of forming his Indian alliance when he returned home to find that his brother the Prophet had just been defeated at Tippecanoe. The defeat itself was no great thing. But it came precisely at a time when it could exert most influence on the unstable Indian character and be most effective in breaking up the alliance of the tribes. Tecumseh, divining this at once, lost no time in vain regrets, but joined the British next year at Amherstburg. He came with only thirty followers. But stray warriors kept on arriving; and many of the bolder spirits joined him when war became imminent. At the time of Brock's arrival there were a thousand effective Indians under arms. Their arming was only authorized at the last minute; for Brock's dispatch to Prevost shows how strictly neutral the Canadian government had been throughout the recent troubles between the Indians and Americans. He mentions that the chiefs at Amherstburg had long been trying to obtain the muskets and ammunition 'which for years had been withheld, agreeably to the instructions received from Sir James Craig, and since repeated by Your Excellency.'

Tecumseh was the last great leader of the Native American tribes and arguably the best representation of their positive qualities. Similar to Pontiac fifty years earlier, but in a more noble fashion, he attempted to unite the tribes against the relentless American expansion. He seemed on the verge of forming this alliance when he returned home to find that his brother, the Prophet, had just been defeated at Tippecanoe. The defeat itself wasn’t significant, but it happened at a time that could greatly affect the fragile Indian morale and disrupt the coalition of the tribes. Understanding this immediately, Tecumseh didn’t waste time on regrets and joined the British the following year in Amherstburg. He started with only thirty followers, but more warriors kept arriving, and many of the more daring individuals signed on as war became likely. By the time Brock arrived, there were a thousand armed Native Americans ready to fight. Their mobilization was only approved at the last moment, as Brock's message to Prevost reveals how strictly neutral the Canadian government had been during the recent conflicts between the Native Americans and Americans. He noted that the chiefs in Amherstburg had been trying for a long time to get the muskets and ammunition that had been withheld for years, following the orders from Sir James Craig, which had been reiterated by Your Excellency.

Precisely at noon Brock took his stand beneath a giant oak at Amherstburg surrounded by his officers. Before him sat Tecumseh. Behind Tecumseh sat the chiefs; and behind the chiefs a thousand Indians in their war-paint. Brock then stepped forward to address them. Erect, alert, broad-shouldered, and magnificently tall; blue-eyed, fair-haired, with frank and handsome countenance; he looked every inch the champion of a great and righteous cause. He said the Long Knives had come to take away the land from both the Indians and the British whites, and that now he would not be content merely to repulse them, but would follow and beat them on their own side of the Detroit. After the pause that was usual on grave occasions, Tecumseh rose and answered for all his followers. He stood there the ideal of an Indian chief: tall, stately, and commanding; yet tense, lithe, observant, and always ready for his spring. He the tiger, Brock the lion; and both unflinchingly at bay.

Precisely at noon, Brock took his position under a giant oak in Amherstburg, surrounded by his officers. In front of him sat Tecumseh. Behind Tecumseh were the chiefs, and behind the chiefs, a thousand Indians in their war paint. Brock then stepped forward to speak to them. Standing tall, alert, broad-shouldered, and impressively tall; blue-eyed, fair-haired, with a straightforward and handsome face; he looked every bit the champion of a great and just cause. He stated that the Long Knives had come to take away the land from both the Indians and the British settlers, and that he would not be satisfied with merely pushing them back, but would pursue and defeat them on their own side of the Detroit. After the customary pause on serious occasions, Tecumseh rose to speak for all his followers. He stood there as the ideal Indian chief: tall, dignified, and authoritative; yet tense, agile, watchful, and always ready to strike. He was the tiger, Brock the lion; both unyielding and poised for action.

Next morning, August 15, an early start was made for Sandwich, some twelve miles north, where a five-gun battery was waiting to be unmasked against Detroit across the river. Arrived at Sandwich, Brock immediately sent across his aide-de-camp, Colonel Macdonell, with a letter summoning Hull to surrender. Hull wrote back to say he was prepared to stand his ground. Brock at once unmasked his battery and made ready to attack next day. With the men on detachment Hull still had a total of twenty-five hundred. Brock had only fifteen hundred, including the Provincial Marine. But Hull's men were losing what discipline they had and were becoming distrustful both of their leaders and of themselves; while Brock's men were gaining discipline, zeal, and inspiring confidence with every hour. Besides, the British were all effectives; while Hull had over five hundred absent from Detroit and as many more ineffective on the spot; which left him only fifteen hundred actual combatants. He also had a thousand non-combatants—men, women, and children—all cowering for shelter from the dangers of battle, and half dead with the far more terrifying apprehension of an Indian massacre.

The next morning, August 15, an early start was made for Sandwich, about twelve miles north, where a five-gun battery was ready to be revealed against Detroit across the river. Once they arrived at Sandwich, Brock immediately sent his aide-de-camp, Colonel Macdonell, with a letter urging Hull to surrender. Hull replied that he was ready to hold his position. Brock quickly unmasked his battery and prepared to attack the next day. With the men on detachment, Hull still had a total of twenty-five hundred. Brock had only fifteen hundred, including the Provincial Marine. However, Hull's men were losing the discipline they had and were growing distrustful of both their leaders and themselves, while Brock's troops were gaining discipline, enthusiasm, and confidence with each passing hour. Additionally, the British were all effective soldiers, while Hull had over five hundred absent from Detroit and as many more who were ineffective on the spot, leaving him with only fifteen hundred actual combatants. He also had a thousand non-combatants—men, women, and children—all huddled together for safety from the dangers of battle, and half terrified by the even more frightening fear of an Indian massacre.

Brock's five-gun battery made excellent practice during the afternoon without suffering any material damage in return. One chance shell produced a most dismaying effect in Detroit by killing Hanks, the late commandant of Mackinaw, and three other officers with him. At twilight the firing ceased on both sides.

Brock's five-gun battery performed exceptionally well in the afternoon without taking any significant damage in return. One stray shell caused a shocking effect in Detroit by killing Hanks, the former commandant of Mackinaw, along with three other officers. As dusk fell, the firing stopped on both sides.

Immediately after dark Tecumseh led six hundred eager followers down to their canoes a little way below Sandwich. These Indians were told off by tribes, as battalions are by companies. There, in silent, dusky groups, moving soft-foot on their moccasins through the gloom, were Shawnees and Miamis from Tecumseh's own lost home beside the Wabash, Foxes and Sacs from the Iowan valley, Ottawas and Wyandots, Chippewas and Potawatomis, some braves from the middle prairies between the Illinois and the Mississippi, and even Winnebagoes and Dakotahs from the far North-West. The flotilla of crowded canoes moved stealthily across the river, with no louder noise than the rippling current made. As secretly, the Indians crept ashore, stole inland through the quiet night, and, circling north, cut off Hull's army from the woods. Little did Hull's anxious sentries think that some of the familiar cries of night-birds round the fort were signals being passed along from scout to scout.

Immediately after dark, Tecumseh led six hundred eager followers down to their canoes a short distance below Sandwich. The Indians were organized by tribes, similar to how battalions are arranged by companies. There, in silent, shadowy groups, moving quietly in their moccasins through the darkness, were Shawnees and Miamis from Tecumseh's own lost home by the Wabash, Foxes and Sacs from the Iowan valley, Ottawas and Wyandots, Chippewas and Potawatomis, some warriors from the middle prairies between the Illinois and the Mississippi, and even Winnebagoes and Dakotahs from the far Northwest. The flotilla of crowded canoes moved silently across the river, making no noise louder than the rippling current. Just as quietly, the Indians crept ashore, slipped inland through the still night, and, circling north, cut off Hull's army from the woods. Little did Hull's anxious sentries realize that some of the familiar calls of night-birds around the fort were signals being relayed from scout to scout.

As the beautiful summer dawn began to break at four o'clock that fateful Sunday morning, the British force fell in, only seven hundred strong, and more than half militia. The thirty gunners who had served the Sandwich battery so well the day before also fell in, with five little field-pieces, in case Brock could force a battle in the open. Their places in the battery were ably filled by every man of the Provincial Marine whom Captain Hall could spare from the Queen Charlotte, the flagship of the tiny Canadian flotilla. Brock's men and his light artillery were soon afloat and making for Spring Wells, more than three miles below Detroit. Then, as the Queen Charlotte ran up her sunrise flag, she and the Sandwich battery roared out a challenge to which the Americans replied with random aim. Brock leaped ashore, formed front towards Hull, got into touch with Tecumseh's Indians on his left, and saw that the British land and water batteries were protecting his right, as prearranged with Captain Hall.

As the beautiful summer dawn began to break at four o'clock that fateful Sunday morning, the British force gathered, just seven hundred strong, with more than half being militia. The thirty gunners who had effectively manned the Sandwich battery the day before also assembled, along with five small field-pieces, in case Brock could push for a battle in the open. Every man of the Provincial Marine that Captain Hall could spare from the Queen Charlotte, the flagship of the small Canadian flotilla, filled their places in the battery. Brock's men and light artillery were soon on the move, heading for Spring Wells, over three miles below Detroit. Then, as the Queen Charlotte raised her sunrise flag, she and the Sandwich battery fired off a challenge, to which the Americans responded with random shots. Brock jumped ashore, formed a line facing Hull, connected with Tecumseh's Indians on his left, and ensured that the British land and water batteries were guarding his right, as planned with Captain Hall.

He had intended to wait in this position, hoping that Hull would march out to the attack. But, even before his men had finished taking post, the whole problem was suddenly changed by the arrival of an Indian to say that McArthur's four hundred picked men, whom Hull had sent south to bring in the convoy, were returning to Detroit at once. There was now only a moment to decide whether to retreat across the river, form front against McArthur, or rush Detroit immediately. But, within that fleeting moment, Brock divined the true solution and decided to march straight on. With Tecumseh riding a grey mustang by his side, he led the way in person. He wore his full-dress gold-and-scarlet uniform and rode his charger Alfred, the splendid grey which Governor Craig had given him the year before, with the recommendation that 'the whole continent of America could not furnish you with so safe and excellent a horse,' and for the good reason that 'I wish to secure for my old favourite a kind and careful master.'

He had planned to stay in this position, hoping Hull would lead an attack. But even before his men finished taking their spots, everything changed when an Indian arrived to say that McArthur's four hundred elite troops, whom Hull had sent south to bring back the convoy, were coming back to Detroit immediately. He now had just a moment to decide whether to retreat across the river, form a front against McArthur, or rush into Detroit right away. But in that brief moment, Brock figured out the best solution and chose to march straight ahead. With Tecumseh riding a gray mustang beside him, he led the charge himself. He wore his full-dress gold-and-scarlet uniform and rode his horse Alfred, the magnificent gray that Governor Craig had given him the year before, with the recommendation that “the whole continent of America could not provide you with a safer and better horse," and for the good reason that "I wish to ensure my old favorite has a kind and careful master."

The seven hundred redcoats made a gallant show, all the more imposing because the militia were wearing some spare uniforms borrowed from the regulars and because the confident appearance of the whole body led the discouraged Americans to think that these few could only be the vanguard of much greater numbers. So strong was this belief that Hull, in sudden panic, sent over to Sandwich to treat for terms, and was astounded to learn that Brock and Tecumseh were the two men on the big grey horses straight in front of him. While Hull's envoys were crossing the river and returning, the Indians were beginning to raise their war-whoops in the woods and Brock was reconnoitring within a mile of the fort. This looked formidable enough, if properly defended, as the ditch was six feet deep and twelve feet wide, the parapet rose twenty feet, the palisades were of twenty-inch cedar, and thirty-three guns were pointed through the embrasures. But Brock correctly estimated the human element inside, and was just on the point of advancing to the assault when Hull's white flag went up.

The seven hundred redcoats made a brave display, even more impressive because the militia was wearing some extra uniforms borrowed from the regulars, and the confident look of the whole group led the discouraged Americans to believe that these few could only be the front line of much larger forces. This belief was so strong that Hull, in sudden panic, sent a messenger to Sandwich to negotiate terms, and was shocked to find out that Brock and Tecumseh were the two men on the big grey horses right in front of him. While Hull's envoys were crossing the river and coming back, the Indians started raising their war cries in the woods, and Brock was scouting within a mile of the fort. This appeared quite intimidating if properly defended, as the ditch was six feet deep and twelve feet wide, the parapet rose twenty feet, the palisades were made of twenty-inch cedar, and thirty-three guns were aimed through the openings. But Brock correctly assessed the human factor inside, and was just about to launch an attack when Hull's white flag went up.

The terms were soon agreed upon. Hull's whole army, including all detachments, surrendered as prisoners of war, while the territory of Michigan passed into the military possession of King George. Abundance of food and military stores fell into British hands, together with the Adams, a fine new brig that had just been completed. She was soon rechristened the Detroit. The Americans sullenly trooped out. The British elatedly marched in. The Stars and Stripes came down defeated. The Union Jack went up victorious and was received with a royal salute from all the British ordnance, afloat and ashore. The Indians came out of the woods, yelling with delight and firing their muskets in the air. But, grouped by tribes, they remained outside the fort and settlement, and not a single outrage was committed. Tecumseh himself rode in with Brock; and the two great leaders stood out in front of the British line while the colours were being changed. Then Brock, in view of all his soldiers, presented his sash and pistols to Tecumseh. Tecumseh, in turn, gave his many-coloured Indian sash to Brock, who wore it till the day he died.

The terms were quickly agreed upon. Hull's entire army, including all detachments, surrendered as prisoners of war, and the territory of Michigan fell into the military hands of King George. A large stockpile of food and military supplies was captured by the British, along with the Adams, a fine new brig that had just been finished. She was soon renamed the Detroit. The Americans left in a sullen manner. The British marched in with excitement. The Stars and Stripes were taken down in defeat. The Union Jack was raised in victory and was greeted with a royal salute from all the British forces, both at sea and on land. The Native Americans emerged from the woods, shouting with joy and firing their muskets into the air. However, organized by tribes, they stayed outside the fort and settlement, and no acts of violence were committed. Tecumseh rode in with Brock, and the two great leaders stood at the front of the British line while the flags were being changed. Then Brock, in front of all his soldiers, presented his sash and pistols to Tecumseh. In return, Tecumseh gave his colorful Indian sash to Brock, who wore it until the day he died.

The effect of the British success at Detroit far exceeded that which had followed the capture of Mackinaw and the evacuation of Fort Dearborn. Those, however important to the West, were regarded as mainly Indian affairs. This was a white man's victory and a white man's defeat. Hull's proclamation thenceforth became a laughing-stock. The American invasion had proved a fiasco. The first American army to take the field had failed at every point. More significant still, the Americans were shown to be feeble in organization and egregiously mistaken in their expectations. Canada, on the other hand, had already found her champion and men quite fit to follow him.

The impact of the British victory at Detroit was much greater than the aftermath of the capture of Mackinaw and the evacuation of Fort Dearborn. While those events were important for the West, they were mainly seen as Indian matters. This was a victory for white people and a defeat for white people. Hull's proclamation became a joke after that. The American invasion turned out to be a disaster. The first American army to go into battle failed on all fronts. Even more importantly, it showed that the Americans were poorly organized and completely wrong in their expectations. Meanwhile, Canada had already found its leader and men who were ready to follow him.

Brock left Procter in charge of the West and hurried back to the Niagara frontier. Arrived at Fort Erie on August 23 he was dismayed to hear of a dangerously one-sided armistice that had been arranged with the enemy. This had been first proposed, on even terms, by Prevost, and then eagerly accepted by Dearborn, after being modified in favour of the Americans. In proposing an armistice Prevost had rightly interpreted the wishes of the Imperial government. It was wise to see whether further hostilities could not be averted altogether; for the obnoxious Orders-in-Council had been repealed. But Prevost was criminally weak in assenting to the condition that all movements of men and material should continue on the American side, when he knew that corresponding movements were impossible on the British side for lack of transport. Dearborn, the American commander-in-chief, was only a second-rate general. But he was more than a match for Prevost at making bargains.

Brock left Procter in charge of the West and rushed back to the Niagara frontier. He arrived at Fort Erie on August 23, only to be frustrated by the news of a dangerously one-sided armistice that had been arranged with the enemy. This was initially proposed on equal terms by Prevost, and then eagerly accepted by Dearborn after being modified to favor the Americans. In suggesting the armistice, Prevost had correctly understood the wishes of the Imperial government. It was smart to see if further fighting could be completely avoided since the troubling Orders-in-Council had been repealed. However, Prevost was seriously weak in agreeing to the condition that all movements of troops and supplies should continue on the American side, knowing that similar movements were impossible on the British side due to a lack of transport. Dearborn, the American commander-in-chief, was just a second-rate general. But he was more than capable of outmaneuvering Prevost in negotiations.

Prevost was one of those men who succeed half-way up and fail at the top. Pure Swiss by blood, he had, like his father, spent his life in the British Army, and had risen to the rank of lieutenant-general. He had served with some distinction in the West Indies, and had been made a baronet for defending Dominica in 1805. In 1808 he became governor of Nova Scotia, and in 1811, at the age of forty-four, governor-general and commander-in-chief of Canada. He and his wife were popular both in the West Indies and in Canada; and he undoubtedly deserved well of the Empire for having conciliated the French Canadians, who had been irritated by his predecessor, the abrupt and masterful Craig. The very important Army Bill Act was greatly due to his diplomatic handling of the French Canadians, who found him so congenial that they stood by him to the end. His native tongue was French. He understood French ways and manners to perfection; and he consequently had far more than the usual sympathy with a people whose nature and circumstances made them particularly sensitive to real or fancied slights. All this is more to his credit than his enemies were willing to admit, either then or afterwards. But, in spite of all these good qualities, Prevost was not the man to safeguard British honour during the supreme ordeal of a war; and if he had lived in earlier times, when nicknames were more apt to become historic, he might well have gone down to posterity as Prevost the Pusillanimous.

Prevost was one of those guys who succeed a little but fail at the top. Pure Swiss by heritage, he spent his life in the British Army like his father and climbed to the rank of lieutenant-general. He served with some distinction in the West Indies and was made a baronet for defending Dominica in 1805. In 1808, he became the governor of Nova Scotia, and in 1811, at the age of forty-four, he was appointed governor-general and commander-in-chief of Canada. He and his wife were well-liked in both the West Indies and Canada, and he undoubtedly earned the Empire's appreciation for winning over the French Canadians, who had been annoyed by his predecessor, the blunt and authoritative Craig. The significant Army Bill Act was largely due to his diplomatic skills with the French Canadians, who found him relatable and supported him until the end. His first language was French, and he understood French culture exceptionally well, giving him a deeper sympathy for a people who were particularly sensitive to real or perceived slights. All of this is credited to him more than his enemies were willing to acknowledge, either then or later. However, despite all these good traits, Prevost was not someone who could protect British honor during the intense challenge of a war, and if he'd lived in earlier times, when nicknames were more likely to become legendary, he could have easily been remembered as Prevost the Coward.

Day after day Prevost's armistice kept the British helpless, while supplies and reinforcements for the Americans poured in at every advantageous point. Brock was held back from taking either Sackett's Harbour, which was meanwhile being strongly reinforced from Ogdensburg, or Fort Niagara, which was being reinforced from Oswego, Procter was held back from taking Fort Wayne, at the point of the salient angle south of Lake Michigan and west of Lake Erie—a quite irretrievable loss. For the moment the British had the command of all the Lakes. But their golden opportunity passed, never to return. By land their chances were also quickly disappearing. On September 1, a week before the armistice ended, there were less than seven hundred Americans directly opposed to Brock, who commanded in person at Queenston and Fort George. On the day of the battle in October there were nearly ten times as many along the Niagara frontier.

Day after day, Prevost's truce kept the British powerless, while supplies and reinforcements for the Americans flowed in at every key location. Brock was unable to capture either Sackett's Harbour, which was being heavily reinforced from Ogdensburg, or Fort Niagara, which was receiving support from Oswego. Procter couldn't take Fort Wayne, located at the sharp angle south of Lake Michigan and west of Lake Erie—a significant loss. For the moment, the British controlled all the Lakes. But their golden chance slipped away, never to return. On land, their opportunities were also quickly fading. On September 1, a week before the truce ended, there were fewer than seven hundred Americans directly opposing Brock, who was personally in charge at Queenston and Fort George. By the day of the battle in October, there were nearly ten times as many along the Niagara frontier.

The very day Brock heard that the disastrous armistice was over he proposed an immediate attack on Sackett's Harbour. But Prevost refused to sanction it. Brock then turned his whole attention to the Niagara frontier, where the Americans were assembling in such numbers that to attack them was out of the question. The British began to receive a few supplies and reinforcements. But the Americans had now got such a long start that, on the fateful 13th of October, they outnumbered Brock's men four to one—4,000 to 1,000 along the critical fifteen miles between the Falls and Lake Ontario; and 6,800 to 1,700 along the whole Niagara river, from lake to lake, a distance of thirty-three miles. The factors which helped to redress the adverse balance of these odds were Brock himself, his disciplined regulars, the intense loyalty of the militia, and the 'telegraph.' This 'telegraph' was a system of visual signalling by semaphore, much the same as that which Wellington had used along the lines of Torres Vedras.

The very day Brock learned that the disastrous ceasefire was over, he proposed an immediate attack on Sackett's Harbour. But Prevost refused to approve it. Brock then focused all his attention on the Niagara frontier, where the Americans were gathering in such numbers that attacking them was out of the question. The British started to receive some supplies and reinforcements. However, the Americans had already gained such a significant advantage that, on the crucial 13th of October, they outnumbered Brock's men four to one—4,000 to 1,000 along the critical fifteen miles between the Falls and Lake Ontario; and 6,800 to 1,700 along the entire Niagara River, from lake to lake, a distance of thirty-three miles. The factors that helped to balance these odds were Brock himself, his disciplined regulars, the intense loyalty of the militia, and the 'telegraph.' This 'telegraph' was a visual signaling system using semaphore, similar to what Wellington had used along the lines of Torres Vedras.

The immediate moral effects, however, were even more favourable to the Americans than the mere physical odds; for Prevost's armistice both galled and chilled the British, who were eager to strike a blow. American confidence had been much shaken in September by the sight of the prisoners from Detroit, who had been marched along the river road in full view of the other side. But it increased rapidly in October as reinforcements poured in. On the 8th a council of war decided to attack Fort George and Queenston Heights simultaneously with every available man. But Smyth, the American general commanding above the Falls, refused to co-operate. This compelled the adoption of a new plan in which only a feint was to be made against Fort George, while Queenston Heights were to be carried by storm. The change entailed a good deal of extra preparation. But when Lieutenant Elliott, of the American Navy, cut out two British vessels at Fort Erie on the 9th, the news made the American troops so clamorous for an immediate invasion that their general, Van Rensselaer, was afraid either to resist them or to let their ardour cool.

The immediate moral effects, however, were even more favorable to the Americans than the mere physical odds; Prevost's armistice irritated and discouraged the British, who were eager to take action. American confidence had been greatly shaken in September by the sight of the prisoners from Detroit, who were marched along the river road in full view of the other side. But it rapidly increased in October as reinforcements arrived. On the 8th, a council of war decided to attack Fort George and Queenston Heights at the same time with every available man. However, Smyth, the American general in charge above the Falls, refused to cooperate. This forced the adoption of a new plan in which only a distraction would be made against Fort George, while Queenston Heights would be taken by storm. The change required a significant amount of extra preparation. But when Lieutenant Elliott of the American Navy seized two British vessels at Fort Erie on the 9th, the news made the American troops so eager for an immediate invasion that their general, Van Rensselaer, was worried either to oppose them or to let their enthusiasm fade.

In the American camp opposite Queenston all was bustle on the 10th of October; and at three the next morning the whole army was again astir, waiting till the vanguard had seized the landing on the British side. But a wrong leader had been chosen; mistakes were plentiful; and confusion followed. Nearly all the oars had been put into the first boat, which, having overshot the mark, was made fast on the British side; whereupon its commander disappeared. The troops on the American shore shivered in the drenching autumn rain till after daylight. Then they went back to their sodden camp, wet, angry, and disgusted.

In the American camp across from Queenston, there was a lot of activity on October 10th; and at three the next morning, the entire army was up again, waiting for the vanguard to take the landing on the British side. But a poor leader had been picked; there were many mistakes, and chaos ensued. Almost all the oars had been put in the first boat, which missed its target and became stuck on the British side; its commander then vanished. The troops on the American shore shivered in the pouring autumn rain until after daybreak. Then they returned to their soaked camp, wet, angry, and frustrated.

While the rain came down in torrents the principal officers were busy revising their plans. Smyth was evidently not to be depended on; but it was thought that, with all the advantages of the initiative, the four thousand other Americans could overpower the one thousand British and secure a permanent hold on the Queenston Heights just above the village. These heights ran back from the Niagara river along Lake Ontario for sixty miles west, curving north-eastwards round Burlington Bay to Dundas Street, which was the one regular land line of communication running west from York. Therefore, if the Americans could hold both the Niagara and the Heights, they would cut Upper Canada in two. This was, of course, quite evident to both sides. The only doubtful questions were, How should the first American attack be made and how should it be met?

While the rain poured down heavily, the main officers were busy revising their plans. It was clear that Smyth couldn't be relied upon; however, it was believed that, with the advantage of taking the initiative, the four thousand other Americans could overwhelm the one thousand British and secure a permanent grip on the Queenston Heights just above the village. These heights extended from the Niagara River along Lake Ontario for sixty miles to the west, curving northeast around Burlington Bay to Dundas Street, which was the only consistent land route for communication heading west from York. So, if the Americans could control both the Niagara and the Heights, they would effectively split Upper Canada in two. This was obvious to both sides. The only uncertain issues were how the initial American attack should be carried out and how it should be countered.

The American general, Stephen Van Rensselaer, was a civilian who had been placed at the head of the New York State militia by Governor Tompkins, both to emphasize the fact that expert regulars were only wanted as subordinates and to win a cunning move in the game of party politics. Van Rensselaer was not only one of the greatest of the old 'patroons' who formed the landed aristocracy of Dutch New York, but he was also a Federalist. Tompkins, who was a Democrat, therefore hoped to gain his party ends whatever the result might be. Victory would mean that Van Rensselaer had been compelled to advance the cause of a war to which he objected; while defeat would discredit both him and his party, besides providing Tompkins with the excuse that it would all have happened very differently if a Democrat had been in charge.

The American general, Stephen Van Rensselaer, was a civilian who had been put in charge of the New York State militia by Governor Tompkins. This decision was meant to highlight that skilled regulars were only needed as subordinates and to make a clever move in the game of party politics. Van Rensselaer was not only one of the most prominent of the old 'patroons' who made up the landed elite of Dutch New York, but he was also a Federalist. Tompkins, a Democrat, aimed to achieve his party's goals regardless of the outcome. A victory would mean that Van Rensselaer had to support a war he opposed; meanwhile, a defeat would tarnish both him and his party, giving Tompkins the opportunity to argue that things would have turned out very differently if a Democrat had been leading.

Van Rensselaer, a man of sense and honour, took the expert advice of his cousin, Colonel Solomon Van Rensselaer, who was a regular and the chief of the staff. It was Solomon Van Rensselaer who had made both plans, the one of the 8th, for attacking Fort George and the Heights together, and the one of the 10th, for feinting against Fort George while attacking the Heights. Brock was puzzled about what was going to happen next. He knew that the enemy were four to one and that they could certainly attack both places if Smyth would co-operate. He also knew that they had boats and men ready to circle round Fort George from the American 'Four Mile Creek' on the lake shore behind Fort Niagara. Moreover, he was naturally inclined to think that when the boats prepared for the 11th were left opposite Queenston all day long, and all the next day too, they were probably intended to distract his attention from Fort George, where he had fixed his own headquarters.

Van Rensselaer, a sensible and honorable man, took the expert advice of his cousin, Colonel Solomon Van Rensselaer, who was a regular officer and the chief of staff. It was Solomon Van Rensselaer who had developed both strategies: one for the 8th to attack Fort George and the Heights together, and another for the 10th to create a diversion against Fort George while attacking the Heights. Brock was confused about what would happen next. He knew the enemy outnumbered them four to one and could certainly attack both locations if Smyth cooperated. He also knew they had boats and troops ready to circle around Fort George from the American 'Four Mile Creek' on the lakeshore behind Fort Niagara. Additionally, he naturally inclined to believe that when the boats meant for the 11th were left opposite Queenston all day and the next day as well, they were probably meant to distract him from Fort George, where he had set up his headquarters.

On the 12th the American plan was matured and concentration begun at Lewiston, opposite Queenston. Large detachments came in, under perfect cover, from Four Mile Creek behind Fort Niagara. A smaller number marched down from the Falls and from Smyth's command still higher up. The camps at Lewiston and the neighbouring Tuscarora Village were partly concealed from every point on the opposite bank, so that the British could form no safe idea of what the Americans were about. Solomon Van Rensselaer was determined that the advance-guard should do its duty this time; so he took charge of it himself and picked out 40 gunners, 300 regular infantry, and 300 of the best militia to make the first attack. These were to be supported by seven hundred regulars. The rest of the four thousand men available were to cross over afterwards. The current was strong; but the river was little more than two hundred yards wide at Queenston and it could be crossed in less than ten minutes. The Queenston Heights themselves were a more formidable obstacle, even if defended by only a few men, as they rose 345 feet above the landing-place.

On the 12th, the American plan was finalized and troops began to gather at Lewiston, across from Queenston. Large groups arrived under complete cover from Four Mile Creek behind Fort Niagara. A smaller number came down from the Falls and from Smyth's command further upstream. The camps at Lewiston and nearby Tuscarora Village were mostly hidden from view on the opposite bank, making it impossible for the British to get a clear idea of the Americans' plans. Solomon Van Rensselaer was determined that the advance guard would perform well this time, so he took charge himself and selected 40 gunners, 300 regular infantry, and 300 of the best militia for the initial attack. They were to be backed up by seven hundred regulars. The remaining four thousand men available were to cross over afterward. The current was strong, but the river was just over two hundred yards wide at Queenston, and it could be crossed in under ten minutes. The Queenston Heights themselves were a significant obstacle, even if only defended by a few men, as they rose 345 feet above the landing area.

There were only three hundred British in Queenston to meet the first attack of over thirteen hundred Americans; but they consisted of the two flank companies of Brock's old regiment, the 49th, supported by some excellent militia. A single gun stood on the Heights. Another was at Vrooman's Point a mile below. Two miles farther, at Brown's Point, stood another gun with another detachment of militia. Four miles farther still was Fort George, with Brock and his second-in-command, Colonel Sheaffe of the 49th. About nine miles above the Heights was the little camp at Chippawa, which, as we shall see, managed to spare 150 men for the second phase of the battle. The few hundred British above this had to stand by their own posts, in case Smyth should try an attack on his own account, somewhere between the Falls and Lake Erie.

There were only three hundred British at Queenston to face the first attack of over thirteen hundred Americans, but they were made up of the two flank companies of Brock's old regiment, the 49th, supported by some excellent militia. A single gun was positioned on the Heights. Another was located at Vrooman's Point, a mile below. Two miles further, at Brown's Point, there was another gun with another group of militia. Four miles beyond that was Fort George, where Brock and his second-in-command, Colonel Sheaffe of the 49th, were stationed. About nine miles above the Heights was the small camp at Chippawa, which, as we will see, managed to send 150 men for the second phase of the battle. The few hundred British stationed above had to stay at their posts in case Smyth attempted an attack on his own somewhere between the Falls and Lake Erie.

At half-past three in the dark morning of the 13th of October, Solomon Van Rensselaer with 225 regulars sprang ashore at the Queenston ferry landing and began to climb the bank. But hardly had they shown their heads above the edge before the grenadier company of the 49th, under Captain Dennis, poured in a stinging volley which sent them back to cover. Van Rensselaer was badly wounded and was immediately ferried back. The American supports, under Colonel Christie, had trouble in getting across; and the immediate command of the invaders devolved upon another regular, Captain Wool.

At 3:30 AM on October 13th, Solomon Van Rensselaer and 225 regular troops landed at the Queenston ferry dock and started to climb the bank. But as soon as they poked their heads over the edge, the grenadier company of the 49th, led by Captain Dennis, fired a sharp volley that sent them retreating for cover. Van Rensselaer was seriously injured and was quickly ferried back. The American reinforcements, under Colonel Christie, struggled to get across; the immediate leadership of the attackers fell to another regular, Captain Wool.

As soon as the rest of the first detachment had landed, Wool took some three hundred infantry and a few gunners, half of all who were then present, and led them up-stream, in single file, by a fisherman's path which curved round and came out on top of the Heights behind the single British gun there. Progress was very slow in this direction, though the distance was less than a mile, as it was still pitch-dark and the path was narrow and dangerous. The three hundred left at the landing were soon reinforced, and the crossing went on successfully, though some of the American boats were carried down-stream to the British post at Vrooman's, where all the men in them were made prisoners and marched off to Fort George.

As soon as the rest of the first group landed, Wool took about three hundred soldiers and a few gunners, which was half of those present at the time, and led them upstream along a narrow fisherman's path that curved around and emerged at the top of the Heights behind the lone British gun there. Progress was very slow in this direction, even though the distance was under a mile, as it was still completely dark and the path was narrow and dangerous. The three hundred soldiers left at the landing were soon reinforced, and the crossing continued successfully, although some of the American boats were swept downstream to the British post at Vrooman's, where everyone on board was captured and taken to Fort George.

Meanwhile, down at Fort George, Brock had been roused by the cannonade only three hours after he had finished his dispatches. Twenty-four American guns were firing hard at Queenston from the opposite shore and two British guns were replying. Fort Niagara, across the river from Fort George, then began to speak; whereupon Fort George answered back. Thus the sound of musketry, five to seven miles away, was drowned; and Brock waited anxiously to learn whether the real attack was being driven home at Queenston, or whether the Americans were circling round from their Four Mile Creek against his own position at Fort George. Four o'clock passed. The roar of battle still came down from Queenston. But this might be a feint. Not even Dennis at Queenston could tell as yet whether the main American army was coming against him or not. But he knew they must be crossing in considerable force, so he sent a dragoon galloping down to Brock, who was already in the saddle giving orders to Sheaffe and to the next senior officer, Evans, when this messenger arrived. Sheaffe was to follow towards Queenston the very instant the Americans had shown their hand decisively in that direction; while Evans was to stay at Fort George and keep down the fire from Fort Niagara.

Meanwhile, at Fort George, Brock had been awakened by the cannon fire just three hours after he finished his reports. Twenty-four American cannons were firing fiercely at Queenston from across the river, and two British cannons were shooting back. Fort Niagara, located across the river from Fort George, then began to join in; and Fort George responded. As a result, the sound of musket fire, five to seven miles away, was drowned out; and Brock waited nervously to find out if the main assault was actually happening at Queenston or if the Americans were maneuvering around from Four Mile Creek toward his position at Fort George. Four o'clock passed. The sounds of battle still echoed from Queenston, but this could be a ruse. Even Dennis at Queenston couldn’t determine yet whether the main American force was advancing against him. However, he knew they must be crossing with significant numbers, so he sent a dragoon racing to Brock, who was already in the saddle giving orders to Sheaffe and the next senior officer, Evans, when the messenger arrived. Sheaffe was to move toward Queenston as soon as the Americans clearly indicated their intentions in that direction, while Evans was to remain at Fort George and manage the fire from Fort Niagara.

Then Brock set spurs to Alfred and raced for Queenston Heights. It was a race for more than his life, for more, even, than his own and his army's honour: it was a race for the honour, integrity, and very life of Canada. Miles ahead he could see the spurting flashes of the guns, the British two against the American twenty-four. Presently his quick eye caught the fitful running flicker of the opposing lines of musketry above the landing-place at Queenston. As he dashed on he met a second messenger, Lieutenant Jarvis, who was riding down full-speed to confirm the news first brought by the dragoon. Brock did not dare draw rein; so he beckoned Jarvis to gallop back beside him. A couple of minutes sufficed for Brock to understand the whole situation and make his plan accordingly. Then Jarvis wheeled back with orders for Sheaffe to bring up every available man, circle round inland, and get into touch with the Indians. A few strides more, and Brock was ordering the men on from Brown's Point. He paused another moment at Vrooman's, to note the practice made by the single gun there. Then, urging his gallant grey to one last turn of speed, he burst into Queenston through the misty dawn just where the grenadiers of his own old regiment stood at bay.

Then Brock spurred Alfred and raced for Queenston Heights. It was a race for more than just his life, even more than just his and his army’s honor: it was a race for the honor, integrity, and very existence of Canada. Miles ahead, he could see the flashes of gunfire, the British two against the American twenty-four. Soon, his sharp eye caught the flickering lines of musket fire above the landing place at Queenston. As he sped on, he encountered a second messenger, Lieutenant Jarvis, who was riding down at full speed to confirm the news first brought by the dragoon. Brock didn’t dare slow down, so he signaled Jarvis to ride alongside him. Just a couple of minutes were enough for Brock to grasp the whole situation and plan accordingly. Then Jarvis turned back with orders for Sheaffe to bring up every available man, circle inward, and connect with the Indians. A few more strides, and Brock was directing the men from Brown's Point. He paused for a moment at Vrooman's to observe the practice being carried out by the single gun there. Then, pushing his brave gray for one last burst of speed, he charged into Queenston through the misty dawn, right where the grenadiers of his old regiment stood ready.

In his full-dress red and gold, with the arrow-patterned sash Tecumseh had given him as a badge of honour at Detroit, he looked, from plume to spur, a hero who could turn the tide of battle against any odds. A ringing cheer broke out in greeting. But he paused no longer than just enough to wave a greeting back and take a quick look round before scaling the Heights to where eight gunners with their single eighteen-pounder were making a desperate effort to check the Americans at the landing-place. Here he dismounted to survey the whole scene of action. The Americans attacking Queenston seemed to be at least twice as strong as the British. The artillery odds were twelve to one. And over two thousand Americans were drawn up on the farther side of the narrow Niagara waiting their turn for the boats. Nevertheless, the British seemed to be holding their own. The crucial question was: could they hold it till Sheaffe came up from Fort George, till Bullock came down from Chippawa, till both had formed front on the Heights, with Indians on their flanks and artillery support from below?

In his full red and gold uniform, adorned with the arrow-patterned sash Tecumseh had given him as a badge of honor at Detroit, he looked like a hero ready to turn the tide of battle against any odds, from plume to spur. A loud cheer erupted in his honor. However, he paused only long enough to wave back and quickly scan the area before climbing the Heights, where eight gunners with their single eighteen-pounder were desperately trying to hold off the Americans at the landing site. He dismounted to get a better view of the entire battlefield. The Americans attacking Queenston seemed to outnumber the British at least two to one. The artillery odds were twelve to one. Over two thousand Americans were lined up on the far side of the narrow Niagara, waiting for their chance to board the boats. Despite this, the British appeared to be maintaining their position. The critical question was: could they hold on until Sheaffe arrived from Fort George, until Bullock came down from Chippawa, and until both had formed a line on the Heights, with Indians on their flanks and artillery support from below?

Suddenly a loud, exultant cheer sounded straight behind him, a crackling fire broke out, and he saw Wool's Americans coming over the crest and making straight for the gun. He was astounded; and well he might be, since the fisherman's path had been reported impassable by troops. But he instantly changed the order he happened to be giving from 'Try a longer fuse!' to 'Spike the gun and follow me!' With a sharp clang the spike went home, and the gunners followed Brock downhill towards Queenston. There was no time to mount, and Alfred trotted down beside his swiftly running master. The elated Americans fired hard; but their bullets all flew high. Wool's three hundred then got into position on the Heights; while Brock in the village below was collecting the nearest hundred men that could be spared for an assault on the invaders.

Suddenly, a loud, triumphant cheer erupted right behind him, a crackling fire ignited, and he saw Wool's Americans coming over the ridge, heading straight for the cannon. He was shocked; and he had every reason to be, since the fisherman's route had been reported as impassable for troops. But he quickly changed his command from 'Try a longer fuse!' to 'Spike the gun and follow me!' With a sharp clang, the spike was driven home, and the gunners followed Brock downhill toward Queenston. There was no time to mount, and Alfred trotted down beside his rapidly moving leader. The excited Americans fired fiercely; but their bullets all soared high. Wool's three hundred then positioned themselves on the Heights; while Brock in the village below was gathering the nearest hundred men that could be spared for an assault on the invaders.

Brock rapidly formed his men and led them out of the village at a fast run to a low stone wall, where he halted and said, 'Take breath, boys; you'll need it presently!' on which they cheered. He then dismounted and patted Alfred, whose flanks still heaved from his exertions. The men felt the sockets of their bayonets; took breath; and then followed Brock, who presently climbed the wall and drew his sword. He first led them a short distance inland, with the intention of gaining the Heights at the enemy's own level before turning riverwards for the final charge. Wool immediately formed front with his back to the river; and Brock led the one hundred British straight at the American centre, which gave way before him. Still he pressed on, waving his sword as an encouragement for the rush that was to drive the enemy down the cliff. The spiked eighteen-pounder was recaptured and success seemed certain. But, just as his men were closing in, an American stepped out of the trees, only thirty yards away, took deliberate aim, and shot him dead. The nearest men at once clustered round to help him, and one of the 49th fell dead across his body. The Americans made the most of this target and hit several more. Then the remaining British broke their ranks and retired, carrying Brock's body into a house at Queenston, where it remained throughout the day, while the battle raged all round.

Brock quickly gathered his men and led them out of the village at a fast pace to a low stone wall, where he stopped and said, "Catch your breath, guys; you'll need it soon!" The men cheered in response. He then got off his horse and patted Alfred, whose sides were still heaving from the effort. The men checked their bayonet sockets, took a moment to breathe, and then followed Brock, who climbed over the wall and drew his sword. He led them a short distance inland, planning to reach the Heights at the enemy’s level before turning toward the river for the final charge. Wool quickly took his position with his back to the river, and Brock led the hundred British soldiers straight at the American center, which gave way. He kept pushing forward, waving his sword to encourage the charge that would drive the enemy down the cliff. They recaptured the spiked eighteen-pounder, and victory seemed certain. But just as his men were closing in, an American stepped out from the trees, only thirty yards away, took careful aim, and shot him dead. The nearest men quickly crowded around to help him, and one of the 49th fell dead across his body. The Americans seized the opportunity and hit several more. Then the remaining British broke formation and retreated, carrying Brock's body into a house in Queenston, where it stayed throughout the day as the battle raged all around.

Wool now re-formed his three hundred and ordered his gunners to drill out the eighteen-pounder and turn it against Queenston, where the British were themselves re-forming for a second attack. This was made by two hundred men of the 49th and York militia, led by Colonel John Macdonell, the attorney-general of Upper Canada, who was acting as aide-de-camp to Brock. Again the Americans were driven back. Again the gun was recaptured. Again the British leader was shot at the critical moment. Again the attack failed. And again the British retreated into Queenston.

Wool reassembled his three hundred troops and ordered his gunners to ready the eighteen-pounder and aim it at Queenston, where the British were regrouping for a second assault. This new attack was launched by two hundred soldiers from the 49th and York militia, led by Colonel John Macdonell, who was serving as Brock's aide-de-camp and was the attorney-general of Upper Canada. Once more, the Americans were pushed back. Once more, the cannon was recaptured. Once more, the British leader was shot at a critical moment. Once more, the attack failed. And once more, the British retreated into Queenston.

Wool then hoisted the Stars and Stripes over the fiercely disputed gun; and several more boatloads of soldiers at once crossed over to the Canadian side, raising the American total there to sixteen hundred men. With this force on the Heights, with a still larger force waiting impatiently to cross, with twenty-four guns in action, and with the heart of the whole defence known to be lying dead in Queenston, an American victory seemed to be so well assured that a courier was sent post-haste to announce the good news both at Albany and at Dearborn's headquarters just across the Hudson. This done, Stephen Van Rensselaer decided to confirm his success by going over to the Canadian side of the river himself. Arrived there, he consulted the senior regulars and ordered the troops to entrench the Heights, fronting Queenston, while the rest of his army was crossing.

Wool then raised the Stars and Stripes over the heavily contested gun; several more boatloads of soldiers immediately crossed to the Canadian side, bringing the total number of Americans there to sixteen hundred men. With this force positioned on the Heights, a larger group waiting impatiently to cross, twenty-four guns in action, and the main defense lying defeated in Queenston, an American victory seemed so certain that a courier was quickly sent to deliver the good news to both Albany and Dearborn's headquarters just across the Hudson. After this, Stephen Van Rensselaer chose to solidify his success by crossing over to the Canadian side of the river himself. Once there, he consulted the senior regulars and ordered the troops to fortify the Heights facing Queenston while the rest of his army was crossing.

But, just when the action had reached such an apparently victorious stage, there was, first, a pause, and then a slightly adverse change, which soon became decidedly ominous. It was as if the flood tide of invasion had already passed the full and the ebb was setting in. Far off, down-stream, at Fort Niagara, the American fire began to falter and gradually grow dumb. But at the British Fort George opposite the guns were served as well as ever, till they had silenced the enemy completely. While this was happening, the main garrison, now free to act elsewhere, were marching out with swinging step and taking the road for Queenston Heights. Near by, at Lewiston, the American twenty-four-gun battery was slackening its noisy cannonade, which had been comparatively ineffective from the first; while the single British gun at Vrooman's, vigorous and effective as before, was reinforced by two most accurate field-pieces under Holcroft in Queenston village, where the wounded but undaunted Dennis was rallying his disciplined regulars and Loyalist militiamen for another fight. On the Heights themselves the American musketry had slackened while most of the men were entrenching; but the Indian fire kept growing closer and more dangerous. Up-stream, on the American side of the Falls, a half-hearted American detachment had been reluctantly sent down by the egregious Smyth; while, on the other side, a hundred and fifty eager British were pressing forward to join Sheaffe's men from Fort George.

But just when the action seemed to be going in their favor, there was a pause followed by a slight shift that quickly turned into something quite troubling. It felt like the wave of invasion had already peaked and was starting to recede. In the distance, downriver at Fort Niagara, American fire began to weaken and gradually faded away. Meanwhile, at the British Fort George, their guns were still firing strong, effectively silencing the enemy completely. During this, the main garrison, now free to move, was marching out confidently toward Queenston Heights. Nearby, at Lewiston, the American twenty-four-gun battery was reducing its loud cannon fire, which had been relatively ineffective from the beginning, while the lone British gun at Vrooman's, still vigorous and effective, was bolstered by two accurate field guns under Holcroft in Queenston village, where the wounded but undaunted Dennis was rallying his disciplined regulars and Loyalist militiamen for another round. On the Heights, the American musket fire had diminished as most soldiers were busy digging in; however, the Indian fire was getting closer and more dangerous. Upstream, on the American side of the Falls, a half-hearted detachment had been reluctantly sent down by the incompetent Smyth, while on the opposite side, a hundred and fifty eager British soldiers were pushing forward to join Sheaffe's men from Fort George.

As the converging British drew near them, the Americans on the Heights began to feel the ebbing of their victory. The least disciplined soon lost confidence and began to slink down to the boats; and very few boats returned when once they had reached their own side safely. These slinkers naturally made the most of the dangers they had been expecting—a ruthless Indian massacre included. The boatmen, nearly all civilians, began to desert. Alarming doubts and rumours quickly spread confusion through the massed militia, who now perceived that instead of crossing to celebrate a triumph they would have to fight a battle. John Lovett, who served with credit in the big American battery, gave a graphic description of the scene: 'The name of Indian, or the sight of the wounded, or the Devil, or something else, petrified them. Not a regiment, not a company, scarcely a man, would go.' Van Rensselaer went through the disintegrating ranks and did his utmost to revive the ardour which had been so impetuous only an hour before. But he ordered, swore, and begged in vain.

As the British forces approached, the Americans on the Heights started to sense their victory slipping away. The least disciplined among them quickly lost confidence and began to sneak down to the boats, and very few boats returned once they had safely made it to their side. Those who snuck away naturally played up the dangers they had anticipated—including a brutal Indian massacre. The boatmen, mostly civilians, began to abandon their posts. Alarming doubts and rumors spread confusion through the crowded militia, who now realized that instead of crossing over to celebrate a victory, they would have to fight a battle. John Lovett, who served with distinction in the large American battery, vividly described the scene: "The thought of Indians, the sight of the wounded, or the Devil, or something else, froze them in place. Not a regiment, not a company, hardly a man, would advance." Van Rensselaer moved through the crumbling ranks, doing everything he could to revive the enthusiasm that had been so fierce just an hour earlier. But he ordered, cursed, and pleaded in vain.

Meanwhile the tide of resolution, hope, and coming triumph was rising fast among the British. They were the attackers now; they had one distinct objective; and their leaders were men whose lives had been devoted to the art of war. Sheaffe took his time. Arrived near Queenston, he saw that his three guns and two hundred muskets there could easily prevent the two thousand disorganized American militia from crossing the river; so he wheeled to his right, marched to St David's, and then, wheeling to his left, gained the Heights two miles beyond the enemy. The men from Chippawa marched in and joined him. The line of attack was formed, with the Indians spread out on the flanks and curving forward. The British in Queenston, seeing the utter impotence of the Americans who refused to cross over, turned their fire against the Heights; and the invaders at once realized that their position had now become desperate.

Meanwhile, a wave of determination, hope, and impending victory was quickly building among the British. They were now the aggressors; they had a clear goal; and their leaders were men who had dedicated their lives to military strategy. Sheaffe took his time. Upon arriving near Queenston, he noted that his three cannons and two hundred muskets were more than enough to stop the two thousand disorganized American militia from crossing the river. So, he turned right, marched to St. David's, and then, turning left, reached the Heights two miles beyond the enemy. The troops from Chippawa joined him. The attack plan was established, with the Indigenous allies spread out on the sides and moving forward. The British in Queenston, witnessing the complete inability of the Americans to cross over, shifted their fire towards the Heights; and the invaders immediately understood that their situation had become dire.

When Sheaffe struck inland an immediate change of the American front was required to meet him. Hitherto the Americans on the Heights had faced down-stream, towards Queenston, at right angles to the river. Now they were obliged to face inland, with their backs to the river. Wadsworth, the American militia brigadier, a very gallant member of a very gallant family, immediately waived his rank in favour of Colonel Winfield Scott, a well-trained regular. Scott and Wadsworth then did all that men could do in such a dire predicament. But most of the militia became unmanageable, some of the regulars were comparatively raw; there was confusion in front, desertion in the rear, and no coherent whole to meet the rapidly approaching shock.

When Sheaffe moved inland, the American front had to change immediately to confront him. Up until that point, the Americans on the Heights had faced downstream, toward Queenston, at a right angle to the river. Now they had to turn to face inland, turning their backs to the river. Wadsworth, the American militia brigadier and a brave member of a brave family, quickly put aside his rank for Colonel Winfield Scott, a well-trained regular. Scott and Wadsworth then did everything they could in such a tough situation. However, most of the militia became uncontrollable, some of the regulars were relatively inexperienced; there was confusion at the front, desertion at the back, and no unified force to handle the quickly approaching threat.

On came the steady British line, with the exultant Indians thrown well forward on the flanks; while the indomitable single gun at Vrooman's Point backed up Holcroft's two guns in Queenston, and the two hundred muskets under Dennis joined in this distracting fire against the American right till the very last moment. The American left was in almost as bad a case, because it had got entangled in the woods beyond the summit and become enveloped by the Indians there. The rear was even worse, as men slank off from it at every opportunity. The front stood fast under Winfield Scott and Wadsworth. But not for long. The British brought their bayonets down and charged. The Indians raised the war-whoop and bounded forward. The Americans fired a hurried, nervous, straggling fusillade; then broke and fled in wild confusion. A very few climbed down the cliff and swam across. Not a single boat came over from the 'petrified' militia. Some more Americans, attempting flight, were killed by falling headlong or by drowning. Most of them clustered among the trees near the edge and surrendered at discretion when Winfield Scott, seeing all was lost, waved his handkerchief on the point of his sword.

The steady British line advanced, with the excited Indians pushed forward on the flanks, while the relentless single gun at Vrooman's Point supported Holcroft's two guns in Queenston, and the two hundred muskets under Dennis joined this distracting fire against the American right until the very last moment. The American left was nearly as bad off, as it got caught up in the woods beyond the summit and was surrounded by the Indians there. The rear was even worse, with men sneaking away at every chance. The front held strong under Winfield Scott and Wadsworth. But not for long. The British lowered their bayonets and charged. The Indians let out a war-whoop and rushed forward. The Americans fired a hurried, shaky volley; then broke and fled in chaos. A few managed to climb down the cliff and swim across. Not a single boat came from the 'petrified' militia. More Americans trying to escape were killed by falling or by drowning. Most of them huddled among the trees near the edge and surrendered when Winfield Scott, realizing all was lost, waved his handkerchief from the point of his sword.

The American loss was about a hundred killed, two hundred wounded, and nearly a thousand prisoners. The British loss was trifling by comparison, only a hundred and fifty altogether. But it included Brock; and his irreparable death alone was thought, by friend and foe alike, to have more than redressed the balance. This, indeed, was true in a much more pregnant sense than those who measure by mere numbers could ever have supposed. For genius is a thing apart from mere addition and subtraction. It is the incarnate spirit of great leaders, whose influence raises to its utmost height the worth of every follower. So when Brock's few stood fast against the invader's many, they had his soaring spirit to uphold them as well as the soul and body of their own disciplined strength.

The American losses were about a hundred dead, two hundred injured, and nearly a thousand taken prisoner. The British losses were minor in comparison, totaling only a hundred and fifty. However, it included Brock; and his irreplaceable death was seen by both friends and enemies as having tipped the scale. This was true in a much more significant way than those who simply count numbers could have imagined. Genius is something beyond just addition and subtraction. It embodies the spirit of great leaders, whose influence boosts the value of every follower to its highest level. So when Brock's small group stood firm against the invader's larger force, they were supported not only by their own disciplined strength but also by his inspiring spirit.

Brock's proper fame may seem to be no more than that which can be won by any conspicuously gallant death at some far outpost of a mighty empire. He ruled no rich and populous dominions. He commanded no well-marshalled host. He fell, apparently defeated, just as his first real battle had begun. And yet, despite of this, he was the undoubted saviour of a British Canada. Living, he was the heart of her preparation during ten long years of peace. Dead, he became the inspiration of her defence for two momentous years of war.

Brock's true fame might look like just another story of a brave death at a distant outpost of a vast empire. He didn't govern any wealthy or populous lands. He led no well-organized army. He fell, seemingly defeated, right as his first real battle was beginning. And yet, despite this, he was undeniably the savior of British Canada. While he was alive, he was the center of her preparation during ten long years of peace. After his death, he became the inspiration for her defense during two crucial years of war.










CHAPTER V — 1813: THE BEAVER DAMS, LAKE ERIE, AND CHATEAUGUAY

The remaining operations of 1812 are of quite minor importance. No more than two are worthy of being mentioned between the greater events before and after them. Both were abortive attempts at invasion—one across the upper Niagara, the other across the frontier south of Montreal.

The remaining events of 1812 are fairly unimportant. Only two are worth mentioning among the more significant events before and after them. Both were unsuccessful attempts at invasion—one over the upper Niagara, the other over the border south of Montreal.

After the battle of Queenston Heights Sheaffe succeeded Brock in command of the British, and Smyth succeeded Van Rensselaer in command of the Americans. Sheaffe was a harsh martinet and a third-rate commander. Smyth, a notorious braggart, was no commander at all. He did, however, succeed in getting Sheaffe to conclude an armistice that fully equalled Prevost's in its disregard of British interests. After making the most of it for a month he ended it on November 19, and began manoeuvring round his headquarters at Black Rock near Buffalo. After another eight days he decided to attack the British posts at Red House and Frenchman's Creek, which were respectively two and a half and five miles from Fort Erie. The whole British line of the upper Niagara, from Fort Erie to Chippawa, a distance of seventeen miles by the road along the river, was under the command of an excellent young officer, Colonel Bisshopp, who had between five and six hundred men to hold his seven posts. Fort Erie had the largest garrison—only a hundred and thirty men. Some forty men of the 49th and two small guns were stationed at Red House; while the light company of the 41st guarded the bridge over Frenchman's Creek. About two o'clock in the morning of the 28th one party of Americans pulled across to the ferry a mile below Fort Erie, and then, sheering off after being fired at by the Canadian militia on guard, made for Red House a mile and a half lower down. There they landed at three and fought a most confused and confusing action in the dark. Friend and foe became mixed up together; but the result was a success for the Americans. Meanwhile, the other party landed near Frenchman's Creek, reached the bridge, damaged it a little, and had a fight with the 41st, who could not drive the invaders back till reinforcements arrived. At daylight the men from Chippawa marched into action, Indians began to appear, and the whole situation was re-established. The victorious British lost nearly a hundred, which was more than a quarter of those engaged. The beaten Americans lost more; but, being in superior numbers, they could the better afford it.

After the Battle of Queenston Heights, Sheaffe took over from Brock in command of the British, while Smyth replaced Van Rensselaer in charge of the Americans. Sheaffe was a tough disciplinarian and a mediocre leader. Smyth, known for his bragging, wasn't really a leader at all. However, he managed to convince Sheaffe to agree to an armistice that completely ignored British interests, just like Prevost's plan. After making the most of the armistice for a month, he ended it on November 19 and started moving around his headquarters at Black Rock near Buffalo. After another eight days, he decided to attack the British positions at Red House and Frenchman's Creek, which were two and a half miles and five miles from Fort Erie, respectively. The entire British line along the upper Niagara, from Fort Erie to Chippawa—seventeen miles by the river road—was under the command of a capable young officer, Colonel Bisshopp, who had between five and six hundred men to defend his seven posts. Fort Erie had the largest garrison, with only one hundred and thirty men. About forty men from the 49th and two small cannons were stationed at Red House, while the light company of the 41st guarded the bridge over Frenchman's Creek. Around two o'clock in the morning of the 28th, one group of Americans crossed the ferry a mile below Fort Erie, but after being shot at by the Canadian militia on guard, they diverted to Red House a mile and a half downriver. They landed at three o'clock and fought a chaotic battle in the dark. Friends and enemies got mixed up, but the outcome was a win for the Americans. Meanwhile, another group landed near Frenchman's Creek, reached the bridge, caused some damage, and fought against the 41st, who couldn’t push the invaders back until reinforcements arrived. At dawn, men from Chippawa marched into the fray, Indians started to show up, and the entire situation was reestablished. The victorious British lost nearly a hundred men, which was more than a quarter of their forces. The defeated Americans lost even more, but being outnumbered, they could handle the losses better.

Smyth was greatly disconcerted. But he held a boat review on his own side of the river, and sent over a summons to Bisshopp demanding the immediate surrender of Fort Erie 'to spare the effusion of blood.' Bisshopp rejected the summons. But there was no effusion of blood in consequence. Smyth planned, talked, and manoeuvred for two days more, and then tried to make his real effort on the 1st of December. By the time it was light enough for the British to observe him he had fifteen hundred men in boats, who all wanted to go back, and three thousand on shore, who all refused to go forward. He then held a council of war, which advised him to wait for a better chance. This closed the campaign with what, according to Porter, one of his own generals, was 'a scene of confusion difficult to describe: about four thousand men without order or restraint discharging their muskets in every direction.' Next day 'The Committee of Patriotic Citizens' undertook to rebuke Smyth. But he retorted, not without reason, that the affair at Queenston is a caution against relying on crowds who go to the banks of the Niagara to look at a battle as on a theatrical exhibition.'

Smyth was really unsettled. However, he held a boat review on his side of the river and sent a message to Bisshopp demanding the immediate surrender of Fort Erie "to avoid bloodshed." Bisshopp turned down the request. But there was no bloodshed as a result. Smyth planned, talked, and strategized for two more days and then made his actual attempt on December 1st. By the time it was light enough for the British to see him, he had fifteen hundred men in boats who all wanted to go back, and three thousand on shore who all refused to move forward. He then held a council of war, which advised him to wait for a better opportunity. This ended the campaign with what Porter, one of his own generals, described as "a scene of confusion difficult to describe: about four thousand men without order or restraint firing their muskets in every direction." The next day, "The Committee of Patriotic Citizens" took it upon themselves to criticize Smyth. But he responded, not without justification, that the incident at Queenston serves as a warning against relying on crowds who come to the banks of Niagara to watch a battle like it’s a show.

The other abortive attempt at invasion was made by the advance-guard of the commander-in-chief's own army. Dearborn had soon found out that his disorderly masses at Greenbush were quite unfit to take the field. But, four months after the declaration of war, a small detachment, thrown forward from his new headquarters at Plattsburg on Lake Champlain, did manage to reach St Regis, where the frontier first meets the St Lawrence, near the upper end of Lake St Francis, sixty miles south-west of Montreal. Here the Americans killed Lieutenant Rototte and a sergeant, and took the little post, which was held by a few voyageurs. Exactly a month later, on November 23, these Americans were themselves defeated and driven back again. Three days earlier than this a much stronger force of Americans had crossed the frontier at Odelltown, just north of which there was a British blockhouse beside the river La Colle, a muddy little western tributary of the Richelieu, forty-seven miles due south of Montreal. The Americans fired into each other in the dark, and afterwards retired before the British reinforcements. Dearborn then put his army into winter quarters at Plattsburg, thus ending his much-heralded campaign against Montreal before it had well begun.

The other failed invasion attempt was made by the advance guard of the commander-in-chief's own army. Dearborn quickly realized that his disorganized troops at Greenbush weren’t ready for battle. However, four months after the war was declared, a small unit sent from his new headquarters at Plattsburg on Lake Champlain managed to reach St. Regis, where the frontier first meets the St. Lawrence, near the northern end of Lake St. Francis, sixty miles southwest of Montreal. Here, the Americans killed Lieutenant Rototte and a sergeant and took the small post held by a few voyageurs. Exactly a month later, on November 23, these Americans were themselves defeated and pushed back. Three days before this, a much stronger group of Americans had crossed the border at Odelltown, just north of which there was a British blockhouse beside the muddy little river La Colle, a western tributary of the Richelieu, forty-seven miles directly south of Montreal. The Americans accidentally fired at each other in the dark and later retreated before the British reinforcements. Dearborn then put his army into winter quarters at Plattsburg, thus concluding his much-publicized campaign against Montreal before it could really get started.

The American government was much disappointed at the failure of its efforts to make war without armies. But it found a convenient scapegoat in Hull, who was far less to blame than his superiors in the Cabinet. These politicians had been wrong in every important particular —wrong about the attitude of the Canadians, wrong about the whole plan of campaign, wrong in separating Hull from Dearborn, wrong in not getting men-of-war afloat on the Lakes, wrong, above all, in trusting to untrained and undisciplined levies. To complete their mortification, the ridiculous gunboats, in which they had so firmly believed, had done nothing but divert useful resources into useless channels; while, on the other hand, the frigates, which they had proposed to lay up altogether, so as to save themselves from 'the ruinous folly of a Navy,' had already won a brilliant series of duels out at sea.

The American government was very disappointed by its failure to wage war without armies. However, it found an easy scapegoat in Hull, who was much less at fault than his superiors in the Cabinet. These politicians had been wrong in every significant way—wrong about how the Canadians would react, wrong about the entire campaign strategy, wrong for separating Hull from Dearborn, wrong for not deploying warships on the Great Lakes, and wrong, above all, for relying on untrained and undisciplined troops. To make matters worse, the ridiculous gunboats, which they had firmly believed in, had done nothing but waste valuable resources on ineffective projects; meanwhile, the frigates they had considered abandoning to avoid what they called the "ruinous folly of a Navy" had already achieved a remarkable series of victories out at sea.

There were some searchings of heart at Washington when all these military and naval misjudgments stood revealed. Eustis soon followed Hull into enforced retirement; and great plans were made for the campaign of 1813, which was designed to wipe out the disgrace of its predecessor and to effect the conquest of Canada for good and all.

There was some soul-searching in Washington when all these military and naval mistakes became clear. Eustis soon joined Hull in forced retirement, and ambitious plans were created for the 1813 campaign, aimed at removing the shame of the previous year's failures and achieving the permanent conquest of Canada.

John Armstrong, the new war secretary, and William Henry Harrison, the new general in the West, were great improvements on Eustis and Hull. But, even now, the American commanders could not decide on a single decisive attack supported by subsidiary operations elsewhere. Montreal remained their prime objective. But they only struck at it last of all. Michilimackinac kept their enemy in touch with the West. But they left it completely alone. Their general advance ought to have been secured by winning the command of the Lakes and by the seizure of suitable positions across the line. But they let the first blows come from the Canadian side; and they still left Lake Champlain to shift for itself. Their plan was undoubtedly better than that of 1812. But it was still all parts and no whole.

John Armstrong, the new war secretary, and William Henry Harrison, the new general in the West, were significant improvements over Eustis and Hull. However, the American commanders still struggled to agree on a single decisive attack backed by supporting operations elsewhere. Montreal was their main target, but they only went after it last. Michilimackinac kept their enemy connected to the West, but they completely ignored it. Their overall advance should have been secured by gaining control of the Lakes and taking key positions along the line. Instead, they allowed the first strikes to come from the Canadian side, and they still left Lake Champlain to fend for itself. Their plan was undoubtedly better than that of 1812, but it still felt disjointed and lacked cohesion.

The various events were so complicated by the overlapping of time and place all along the line that we must begin by taking a bird's-eye view of them in territorial sequence, starting from the farthest inland flank and working eastward to the sea. Everything west of Detroit may be left out altogether, because operations did not recommence in that quarter until the campaign of the following year.

The different events were so complicated by the overlap of time and place that we need to start by getting an overall view of them in geographic order, beginning from the furthest inland point and moving east toward the sea. We can completely skip over everything west of Detroit, since activities didn’t pick up again in that area until the campaign the next year.

In January the British struck successfully at Frenchtown, more than thirty miles south of Detroit. They struck unsuccessfully, still farther south, at Fort Meigs in May and at Fort Stephenson in August; after which they had to remain on the defensive, all over the Lake Erie region, till their flotilla was annihilated at Put-in Bay in September and their army was annihilated at Moravian Town on the Thames in October. In the Lake Ontario region the situation was reversed. Here the British began badly and ended well. They surrendered York in April and Fort George, at the mouth of the Niagara, in May. They were also repulsed in a grossly mismanaged attack on Sackett's Harbour two days after their defeat at Fort George. The opposing flotillas meanwhile fought several manoeuvring actions of an indecisive kind, neither daring to risk battle and possible annihilation. But, as the season advanced, the British regained their hold on the Niagara peninsula by defeating the Americans at Stoney Creek and the Beaver Dams in June, and by clearing both sides of the Niagara river in December. On the upper St Lawrence they took Ogdensburg in February. They were also completely successful in their defence of Montreal. In June they took the American gunboats at Isle-aux-Noix on the Richelieu; in July they raided Lake Champlain; while in October and November they defeated the two divisions of the invading army at Chateauguay and Chrystler's Farm. The British news from sea also improved as the year wore on. The American frigate victories began to stop. The Shannon beat the Chesapeake. And the shadow of the Great Blockade began to fall on the coast of the Democratic South.

In January, the British successfully attacked Frenchtown, located more than thirty miles south of Detroit. They had unsuccessful strikes farther south at Fort Meigs in May and Fort Stephenson in August; after those, they were forced to stay on the defensive throughout the Lake Erie region until their fleet was destroyed at Put-in Bay in September and their army was defeated at Moravian Town on the Thames in October. In the Lake Ontario area, the situation flipped. The British started off poorly but finished strong. They surrendered York in April and Fort George, at the mouth of the Niagara River, in May. They were also turned back in a badly executed attack on Sackett's Harbour just two days after their loss at Fort George. Meanwhile, the opposing fleets engaged in several inconclusive maneuvers, neither side willing to risk a full battle and possible destruction. However, as the season progressed, the British regained control of the Niagara Peninsula by defeating the Americans at Stoney Creek and Beaver Dams in June and clearing both sides of the Niagara River in December. They captured Ogdensburg on the upper St. Lawrence in February. Their defense of Montreal was also completely successful. In June, they captured American gunboats at Isle-aux-Noix on the Richelieu; in July, they raided Lake Champlain; and in October and November, they defeated two divisions of the invading army at Chateauguay and Chrystler's Farm. British news from the sea also improved as the year went on. The American victories with frigates began to decline. The Shannon defeated the Chesapeake. And the threat of the Great Blockade started to loom over the coast of the Democratic South.

The operations of 1813 are more easily understood if taken in this purely territorial way. But in following the progress of the war we must take them chronologically. No attempt can be made here to describe the movements on either side in any detail. An outline must suffice. Two points, however, need special emphasis, as they are both markedly characteristic of the war in general and of this campaign in particular. First, the combined effect of the American victories of Lake Erie and the Thames affords a perfect example of the inseparable connection between the water and the land. Secondly, the British victories at the Beaver Dams and Chateauguay are striking examples of the inter-racial connection among the forces that defended Canada so well. The Indians did all the real fighting at the Beaver Dams. The French Canadians fought practically alone at Chateauguay.

The events of 1813 are easier to understand if we look at them purely in terms of territory. However, to follow the progress of the war, we need to consider them chronologically. There's no way to go into detail about the movements on either side here, so an overview will have to do. Still, two points stand out that are particularly characteristic of the war overall and this campaign in particular. First, the combined impact of the American victories at Lake Erie and the Thames perfectly illustrates the crucial link between land and water. Second, the British victories at Beaver Dams and Chateauguay are clear examples of the cooperation between different groups that defended Canada so effectively. The Indigenous people did most of the fighting at Beaver Dams. The French Canadians essentially fought on their own at Chateauguay.

The first move of the invaders in the West was designed to recover Detroit and cut off Mackinaw. Harrison, victorious over the Indians at Tippecanoe in 1811, was now expected to strike terror into them once more, both by his reputation and by the size of his forces. In midwinter he had one wing of his army on the Sandusky, under his own command, and the other on the Maumee, under Winchester, a rather commonplace general. At Frenchtown stood a little British post defended by fifty Canadians and a hundred Indians. Winchester moved north to drive these men away from American soil. But Procter crossed the Detroit from Amherstburg on the ice, and defeated Winchester's thousand whites with his own five hundred whites and five hundred Indians at dawn on January 22, making Winchester a prisoner. Procter was unable to control the Indians, who ran wild. They hated the Westerners who made up Winchester's force, as the men who had deprived them of their lands, and they now wreaked their vengeance on them for some time before they could be again brought within the bounds of civilized warfare. After the battle Procter retired to Amherstburg; Harrison began to build Fort Meigs on the Maumee; and a pause of three months followed all over the western scene.

The first move of the invaders in the West aimed to reclaim Detroit and cut off Mackinaw. Harrison, who had triumphed over the Indians at Tippecanoe in 1811, was now expected to instill fear in them again, thanks to his reputation and the size of his forces. In midwinter, he had one part of his army on the Sandusky, under his own command, and another on the Maumee, led by Winchester, who was a rather average general. At Frenchtown, there was a small British outpost defended by fifty Canadians and a hundred Indians. Winchester advanced north to drive these men off American soil. However, Procter crossed the Detroit from Amherstburg on the ice and defeated Winchester's thousand troops with his own five hundred troops and five hundred Indians at dawn on January 22, capturing Winchester in the process. Procter struggled to control the Indians, who went wild. They resented the Westerners in Winchester's force for taking their lands, and they unleashed their rage on them for a while before they could be brought back under civilized warfare. After the battle, Procter retreated to Amherstburg; Harrison started building Fort Meigs on the Maumee; and there was a three-month pause across the western front.

But winter warfare was also going on elsewhere. A month after Procter's success, Prevost, when passing through Prescott, on the upper St Lawrence, reluctantly gave Colonel Macdonell of Glengarry provisional leave to attack Ogdensburg, from which the Americans were forwarding supplies to Sackett's Harbour, sending out raiding parties, and threatening the British line of communication to the west. No sooner was Prevost clear of Prescott than Macdonell led his four hundred regulars and one hundred militia over the ice against the American fort. His direct assault failed. But when he had carried the village at the point of the bayonet the garrison ran. Macdonell then destroyed the fort, the barracks, and four vessels. He also took seventy prisoners, eleven guns, and a large supply of stores.

But winter warfare was also happening elsewhere. A month after Procter's victory, Prevost, while passing through Prescott on the upper St. Lawrence, reluctantly gave Colonel Macdonell of Glengarry temporary permission to attack Ogdensburg, from which the Americans were sending supplies to Sackett's Harbour, launching raiding parties, and threatening the British supply line to the west. As soon as Prevost left Prescott, Macdonell led his four hundred regulars and one hundred militia over the ice toward the American fort. His direct attack failed. However, after he captured the village with a bayonet charge, the garrison fled. Macdonell then destroyed the fort, the barracks, and four ships. He also took seventy prisoners, eleven cannons, and a large supply of goods.

With the spring came new movements in the West. On May 9 Procter broke camp and retired from an unsuccessful siege of Fort Meigs (now Toledo) at the south-western corner of Lake Erie. He had started this siege a fortnight earlier with a thousand whites and a thousand Indians under Tecumseh; and at first had seemed likely to succeed. But after the first encounter the Indians began to leave; while most of the militia had soon to be sent home to their farms to prevent the risk of starvation. Thus Procter presently found himself with only five hundred effectives in face of a much superior and constantly increasing enemy. In the summer he returned to the attack, this time against the American position on the lower Sandusky, nearly thirty miles east of Fort Meigs. There, on August 2, he tried to take Fort Stephenson. But his light guns could make no breach; and he lost a hundred men in the assault.

With spring came new movements in the West. On May 9, Procter packed up and withdrew from an unsuccessful siege of Fort Meigs (now Toledo) at the southwestern corner of Lake Erie. He had started this siege two weeks earlier with a thousand white soldiers and a thousand Indians under Tecumseh, and at first, it seemed like he might succeed. But after the first confrontation, the Indians began to leave, and most of the militia soon had to be sent home to their farms to avoid the risk of starvation. As a result, Procter found himself with only five hundred effective troops against a much larger and continuously growing enemy. In the summer, he returned to the attack, this time targeting the American position at lower Sandusky, nearly thirty miles east of Fort Meigs. There, on August 2, he attempted to take Fort Stephenson. However, his light artillery couldn't create a breach, and he lost a hundred men in the assault.

Meanwhile Dearborn, having first moved up from Plattsburg to Sackett's Harbour, had attacked York on April 27 with the help of the new American flotilla on Lake Ontario. This flotilla was under the personal orders of Commodore Chauncey, an excellent officer, who, in the previous September, had been promoted from superintendent of the New York Navy Yard to commander-in-chief on the Lakes. As Chauncey's forte was building and organization, he found full scope for his peculiar talents at Sackett's Harbour. He was also a good leader at sea and thus a formidable enemy for the British forces at York, where the third-rate Sheaffe was now in charge, and where Prevost had paved the way for a British defeat by allowing the establishment of an exposed navy yard instead of keeping all construction safe in Kingston. Sheaffe began his mistakes by neglecting to mount some of his guns before Dearborn and Chauncey arrived, though he knew these American commanders might come at any moment, and though he also knew how important it was to save a new British vessel that was building at York, because the command of the lake might well depend upon her. He then made another mistake by standing to fight in an untenable position against overwhelming odds. He finally retreated with all the effective regulars left, less than two hundred, burning the ship and yard as he passed, and leaving behind three hundred militia to make their own terms with the enemy. He met the light company of the 8th on its way up from Kingston and turned it back. With this retreat he left the front for good and became a commandant of bases, a position often occupied by men whose failures are not bad enough for courts-martial and whose saving qualities are not good enough for any more appointments in the field.

Meanwhile, Dearborn, after moving up from Plattsburg to Sackett's Harbour, attacked York on April 27 with the support of the new American flotilla on Lake Ontario. This flotilla was under the direct orders of Commodore Chauncey, an outstanding officer who had been promoted from superintendent of the New York Navy Yard to commander-in-chief on the Lakes the previous September. Chauncey's strengths lay in building and organization, so he had plenty of opportunity to showcase his unique skills at Sackett's Harbour. He was also a capable leader at sea, making him a significant threat to the British forces at York, where the third-rate Sheaffe was now in charge. Prevost had set the stage for a British defeat by allowing an exposed navy yard to be established instead of keeping all construction secure in Kingston. Sheaffe began making mistakes by failing to mount some of his guns before Dearborn and Chauncey arrived, despite knowing these American commanders could arrive at any moment and recognizing the importance of protecting a new British vessel being built at York, as controlling the lake might depend on her. He compounded his errors by choosing to fight from a weak position against overwhelming odds. Ultimately, he retreated with fewer than two hundred effective regulars, burning the ship and yard as he left and leaving behind three hundred militia to negotiate their own terms with the enemy. He encountered the light company of the 8th on its way up from Kingston and turned it back. With this retreat, he exited the front line for good and became a commandant of bases, a position often filled by individuals whose failures are not severe enough for courts-martial and whose redeeming qualities are insufficient for further field appointments.

The Americans lost over two hundred men by an explosion in a British battery at York just as Sheaffe was marching off. Forty British had also been blown up in one of the forts a little while before. Sheaffe appears to have been a slack inspector of powder-magazines. But the Americans, who naturally suspected other things than slack inspection, thought a mine had been sprung on them after the fight was over. They consequently swore revenge, burnt the parliament buildings, looted several private houses, and carried off books from the public library as well as plate from the church. Chauncey, much to his credit, afterwards sent back all the books and plate he could recover.

The Americans lost over two hundred men in an explosion at a British battery in York just as Sheaffe was leaving. Forty British soldiers had also been killed in one of the forts shortly before that. Sheaffe seems to have been careless in inspecting the powder magazines. However, the Americans, naturally suspecting more than just negligence, thought a mine had been detonated against them after the fighting ended. As a result, they vowed revenge, burned down the parliament buildings, looted several private homes, and took books from the public library as well as silver from the church. Chauncey, to his credit, later returned all the books and silver he could recover.

Exactly a month later, on May 27, Chauncey and Dearborn appeared off Fort George, after a run back to Sackett's Harbour in the meantime. Vincent, Sheaffe's successor in charge of Upper Canada, had only a thousand regulars and four hundred militia there. Dearborn had more than four times as many men; and Perry, soon to become famous on Lake Erie, managed the naval part of landing them. The American men-of-war brought the long, low, flat ground of Mississauga Point under an irresistible cross-fire while three thousand troops were landing on the beach below the covering bluffs. No support could be given to the opposing British force by the fire of Fort George, as the village of Newark intervened. So Vincent had to fight it out in the open. On being threatened with annihilation he retired towards Burlington, withdrawing the garrison of Fort George, and sending orders for all the other troops on the Niagara to follow by the shortest line. He had lost a third of the whole force defending the Niagara frontier, both sides of which were now possessed by the Americans. But by nightfall on May 29 he was standing at bay, with his remaining sixteen hundred men, in an excellent strategical position on the Heights, half-way between York and Fort George, in touch with Dundas Street, the main road running east and west, and beside Burlington Bay, where he hoped to meet the British flotilla commanded by Yeo.

Exactly a month later, on May 27, Chauncey and Dearborn showed up off Fort George after a trip back to Sackett's Harbour in the meantime. Vincent, who took over from Sheaffe in charge of Upper Canada, only had a thousand regulars and four hundred militia there. Dearborn had more than four times that number; and Perry, who would soon become well-known on Lake Erie, managed the naval side of landing them. The American warships created an unstoppable cross-fire over the long, flat ground of Mississauga Point while three thousand troops were coming ashore on the beach below the protective bluffs. The fire from Fort George couldn’t help the British forces since the village of Newark got in the way. So, Vincent had to fight in the open. Facing the threat of destruction, he retreated towards Burlington, pulling back the garrison of Fort George and giving orders for all the other troops on the Niagara to follow the quickest route. He had lost a third of the entire force defending the Niagara frontier, which was now completely controlled by the Americans. But by nightfall on May 29, he was standing his ground with his remaining sixteen hundred men in a strong strategic position on the Heights, halfway between York and Fort George, close to Dundas Street, the main road running east and west, and next to Burlington Bay, where he hoped to meet the British flotilla led by Yeo.

Captain Sir James Lucas Yeo was an energetic and capable young naval officer of thirty, whom the Admiralty had sent out with a few seamen to take command on the Lakes under Prevost's orders. He had been only seventeen days at Kingston when he sailed out with Prevost, on May 27, to take advantage of Chauncey's absence at the western end of the lake. Arrived before Sackett's Harbour, the attack was planned for the 29th. The landing force of seven hundred and fifty men was put in charge of Baynes, the adjutant-general, a man only too well fitted to do the 'dirty work' of the general staff under a weak commander-in-chief like Prevost. All went wrong at Sackett's Harbour. Prevost was 'present but not in command'; Baynes landed at the wrong place. Nevertheless, the British regulars scattered the American militiamen, pressed back the American regulars, set fire to the barracks, and halted in front of the fort. The Americans, thinking the day was lost, set fire to their stores and to Chauncey's new ships. Then Baynes and Prevost suddenly decided to retreat. Baynes explained to Prevost, and Prevost explained in a covering dispatch to the British government, that the fleet could not co-operate, that the fort could not be taken, and that the landing party was not strong enough. But, if this was true, why did they make an attack at all; and, if it was not true, why did they draw back when success seemed to be assured?

Captain Sir James Lucas Yeo was an energetic and capable young naval officer of thirty, whom the Admiralty had sent out with a few seamen to take command on the Lakes under Prevost's orders. He had been only seventeen days at Kingston when he sailed out with Prevost on May 27 to take advantage of Chauncey's absence at the western end of the lake. Upon arriving before Sackett's Harbor, the attack was planned for the 29th. The landing force of seven hundred and fifty men was put in charge of Baynes, the adjutant-general, a man well-suited to handle the 'dirty work' of the general staff under a weak commander-in-chief like Prevost. Everything went wrong at Sackett's Harbor. Prevost was 'present but not in command'; Baynes landed at the wrong place. Nevertheless, the British regulars scattered the American militiamen, pushed back the American regulars, set fire to the barracks, and halted in front of the fort. The Americans, believing the day was lost, set fire to their supplies and to Chauncey's new ships. Then Baynes and Prevost suddenly decided to retreat. Baynes explained to Prevost, and Prevost explained in a covering dispatch to the British government, that the fleet could not cooperate, that the fort could not be taken, and that the landing party was not strong enough. But if this was true, why did they make an attack at all? And if it wasn't true, why did they pull back when success seemed to be within reach?

Meanwhile Chauncey, after helping to take Fort George, had started back for Sackett's Harbour; and Dearborn, left without the fleet, had moved on slowly and disjointedly, in rear of Vincent, with whom he did not regain touch for a week. On June 5 the Americans camped at Stoney Creek, five miles from the site of Hamilton. The steep zigzagging bank of the creek, which formed their front, was about twenty feet high. Their right rested on a mile-wide swamp, which ran down to Lake Ontario. Their left touched the Heights, which ran from Burlington to Queenston. They were also in superior numbers, and ought to have been quite secure. But they thought so much more of pursuit than of defence that they were completely taken by surprise when '704 firelocks' under Colonel Harvey suddenly attacked them just after midnight. Harvey, chief staff officer to Vincent, was a first-rate leader for such daring work as this, and his men were all well disciplined. But the whole enterprise might have failed, for all that. Some of the men opened fire too soon, and the nearest Americans began to stand to their arms. But, while Harvey ran along re-forming the line, Major Plenderleath, with some of Brock's old regiment, the 49th, charged straight into the American centre, took the guns there, and caused so much confusion that Harvey's following charge carried all before it. Next morning, June 6, the Americans began a retreat which was hastened by Yeo's arrival on their lakeward flank, by the Indians on the Heights, and by Vincent's reinforcements in their rear. Not till they reached the shelter of Fort George did they attempt to make a stand.

Meanwhile, Chauncey, after helping capture Fort George, started back for Sackett's Harbour. Dearborn, left without the fleet, moved slowly and awkwardly behind Vincent, not reconnecting with him for a week. On June 5, the Americans set up camp at Stoney Creek, five miles from Hamilton's location. The steep, zigzagging bank of the creek in front of them was about twenty feet high. Their right side rested against a mile-wide swamp that led down to Lake Ontario, while their left touched the Heights, extending from Burlington to Queenston. They had superior numbers and should have felt secure. However, they focused so much on the pursuit rather than defense that they were completely caught off guard when '704 firelocks' under Colonel Harvey suddenly attacked just after midnight. Harvey, Vincent's chief staff officer, was an excellent leader for such a bold move, and his troops were well-disciplined. Still, the whole operation could have failed. Some of the men fired too early, and the nearest Americans started to grab their weapons. While Harvey ran along restructuring the line, Major Plenderleath, with some soldiers from Brock's old regiment, the 49th, charged directly into the American center, seized the guns, and created enough chaos for Harvey's subsequent charge to sweep everything aside. The next morning, June 6, the Americans began to retreat, hastened by Yeo's arrival on their flank by the lake, the Indians on the Heights, and Vincent's reinforcements in their rear. They didn’t attempt to stand firm until they reached the safety of Fort George.

The two armies now faced each other astride of the lake-shore road and the Heights. The British left advanced post, between Ten and Twelve Mile Creeks, was under Major de Haren of the 104th, a regiment which, in the preceding winter, had marched on snow-shoes through the woods all the way from the middle of New Brunswick to Quebec. The corresponding British post inland, near the Beaver Dams, was under Lieutenant FitzGibbon of the 49th, a cool, quick-witted, and adventurous Irishman, who had risen from the ranks by his own good qualities and Brock's recommendation. Between him and the Americans at Queenston and St David's was a picked force of Indian scouts with a son of the great chief Joseph Brant. These Indians never gave the Americans a minute's rest. They were up at all hours, pressing round the flanks, sniping the sentries, worrying the outposts, and keeping four times their own numbers on the perpetual alert. What exasperated the Americans even more was the wonderfully elusive way in which the Indians would strike their blow and then be lost to sight and sound the very next moment, if, indeed, they ever were seen at all. Finally, this endless skirmish with an invisible foe became so harassing that the Americans sent out a flying column of six hundred picked men under Colonel Boerstler on June 24 to break up FitzGibbon's post at the Beaver Dams and drive the Indians out of the intervening bush altogether.

The two armies now faced each other along the lake-shore road and the Heights. The British left advanced post, between Ten and Twelve Mile Creeks, was under Major de Haren of the 104th, a regiment that, during the previous winter, had marched on snowshoes through the woods all the way from central New Brunswick to Quebec. The corresponding British post inland, near the Beaver Dams, was under Lieutenant FitzGibbon of the 49th, a cool, quick-witted, and adventurous Irishman who had risen through the ranks due to his own abilities and Brock's recommendation. Between him and the Americans at Queenston and St. David's was a select group of Indian scouts, including a son of the great chief Joseph Brant. These Indians never gave the Americans a moment's peace. They were active at all hours, flanking the soldiers, sniping the sentries, harassing the outposts, and keeping four times their own numbers constantly on edge. What frustrated the Americans even more was how the Indians would strike and then vanish without a trace, if they were ever seen at all. Eventually, this nonstop skirmish with an unseen enemy became so exhausting that the Americans dispatched a quick force of six hundred elite men under Colonel Boerstler on June 24 to disrupt FitzGibbon's post at the Beaver Dams and drive the Indians out of the surrounding woods completely.

But the American commanders had not succeeded in hiding their preparations from the vigilant eyes of the Indian scouts or from the equally attentive ears of Laura Secord, the wife of an ardent U. E. Loyalist, James Secord, who was still disabled by the wounds he had received when fighting under Brock's command at Queenston Heights. Early in the morning of the 23rd, while Laura Secord was going out to milk the cows, she overheard some Americans talking about the surprise in store for FitzGibbon next day. Without giving the slightest sign she quietly drove the cattle in behind the nearest fence, hid her milk-pail, and started to thread her perilous way through twenty miles of bewildering bypaths to the Beaver Dams. Keeping off the beaten tracks and always in the shadow of the full-leaved trees, she stole along through the American lines, crossed the no-man's-land between the two desperate enemies, and managed to get inside the ever-shifting fringe of Indian scouts without being seen by friend or foe. The heat was intense; and the whole forest steamed with it after the tropical rain. But she held her course without a pause, over the swollen streams on fallen tree-trunks, through the dense underbrush, and in and out of the mazes of the forest, where a bullet might come from either side without a moment's warning. As she neared the end of her journey a savage yell told her she was at last discovered by the Indians. She and they were on the same side; but she had hard work to persuade them that she only wished to warn FitzGibbon. Then came what, to a lesser patriot, would have been a crowning disappointment. For when, half dead with fatigue, she told him her story, she found he had already heard it from the scouts. But just because this forestalment was no real disappointment to her, it makes her the Anglo-Canadian heroine whose fame for bravery in war is worthiest of being remembered with that of her French-Canadian sister, Madeleine de Vercheres. [Footnote: For Madeleine de Vercheres see The fighting Governor in this Series.]

But the American commanders couldn't hide their preparations from the watchful Indian scouts or from the equally sharp ears of Laura Secord, the wife of a passionate U.E. Loyalist, James Secord, who was still recovering from injuries he sustained fighting under Brock's command at Queenston Heights. Early in the morning of the 23rd, while Laura Secord was going out to milk the cows, she overheard some Americans discussing a surprise planned for FitzGibbon the next day. Without showing any signs, she quietly moved the cattle behind the nearest fence, hid her milk pail, and began her dangerous trek through twenty miles of confusing paths to the Beaver Dams. Staying off the main trails and always in the shadows of the thick trees, she stealthily made her way through the American lines, crossed the no-man's-land between the two desperate sides, and managed to get into the constantly shifting group of Indian scouts without being spotted by either friend or foe. The heat was intense, and the entire forest was steaming after the heavy rain. But she kept moving without pause, over swollen streams on fallen logs, through dense undergrowth, and in and out of the forest's twists and turns, where a bullet could come from either side without warning. As she got closer to her destination, a fierce yell signaled that she had finally been spotted by the Indians. Although she and they were on the same side, she had to work hard to convince them that she only wanted to warn FitzGibbon. Then came what would have been a huge disappointment for a lesser patriot. When, half-dead from exhaustion, she told him her story, she found out he had already heard it from the scouts. But this foreknowledge didn't truly disappoint her, which is why she stands out as the Anglo-Canadian heroine whose bravery in war deserves to be remembered alongside her French-Canadian counterpart, Madeleine de Vercheres. [Footnote: For Madeleine de Vercheres see The fighting Governor in this Series.]

Boerstler's six hundred had only ten miles to go in a straight line. But all the thickets, woods, creeks, streams, and swamps were closely beset by a body of expert, persistent Indians, who gradually increased from two hundred and fifty to four hundred men. The Americans became discouraged and bewildered; and when FitzGibbon rode up at the head of his redcoats they were ready to give in. The British posts were all in excellent touch with each other; and de Haren arrived in time to receive the actual surrender. He was closely followed by the 2nd Lincoln Militia under Colonel Clark, and these again by Colonel Bisshopp with the whole of the advanced guard. But it was the Indians alone who won the fight, as FitzGibbon generously acknowledged: 'Not a shot was fired on our side by any but the Indians. They beat the American detachment into a state of terror, and the only share I claim is taking advantage of a favourable moment to offer protection from the tomahawk and scalping knife.'

Boerstler's six hundred had just ten miles left to travel in a straight line. However, the path was heavily blocked by a group of skilled and determined Indians, who grew from two hundred and fifty to four hundred men. The Americans became disheartened and confused, and when FitzGibbon arrived leading his redcoats, they were ready to surrender. The British forces were all well-coordinated, and de Haren showed up in time to accept the actual surrender. He was closely followed by the 2nd Lincoln Militia led by Colonel Clark, and then Colonel Bisshopp with the entire advance guard came after them. But it was the Indians who truly won the battle, as FitzGibbon graciously admitted: 'Not a shot was fired on our side by anyone but the Indians. They terrified the American detachment, and the only credit I take is seizing the opportunity to offer protection from the tomahawk and scalping knife.'

June was a lucky month for the British at sea as well as on the land; and its 'Glorious First,' so called after Howe's victory nineteen years before, now became doubly glorious in a way which has a special interest for Canada. The American frigate Chesapeake was under orders to attack British supply-ships entering Canadian waters; and the victorious British frigate Shannon was taken out of action and into a Canadian port by a young Canadian in the Royal Navy.

June was a lucky month for the British both at sea and on land; and its 'Glorious First,' named after Howe's victory nineteen years earlier, became even more glorious in a way that holds special interest for Canada. The American frigate Chesapeake was ordered to attack British supply ships entering Canadian waters; and the victorious British frigate Shannon was taken out of action and into a Canadian port by a young Canadian in the Royal Navy.

The Chesapeake had a new captain, Lawrence, with new young officers. She carried fifty more men than the British frigate Shannon. But many of her ship's company were new to her, on recommissioning in May; and some were comparatively untrained for service on board a man-of-war. The frigates themselves were practically equal in size and armament. But Captain Broke had been in continuous command of the Shannon for seven years and had trained his crew into the utmost perfection of naval gunnery. The vessels met off Boston in full view of many thousands of spectators. Not one British shot flew high. Every day in the Shannon's seven years of preparation told in that fight of only fifteen minutes; and when Broke led his boarders over the Chesapeake's side her fate had been sealed already. The Stars and Stripes were soon replaced by the Union Jack. Then, with Broke severely wounded and his first lieutenant killed, the command fell on Lieutenant Wallis, who sailed both vessels into Halifax. This young Canadian, afterwards known as Admiral-of-the-Fleet Sir Provo Wallis, lived to become the longest of all human links between the past and present of the Navy. He was by far the last survivor of those officers who were specially exempted from technical retirement on account of having held any ship or fleet command during the Great War that ended on the field of Waterloo. He was born before Napoleon had been heard of. He went through a battle before the death of Nelson. He outlived Wellington by forty years. His name stood on the Active List for all but the final decade of the nineteenth century. And, as an honoured centenarian, he is vividly remembered by many who were still called young a century after the battle that brought him into fame.

The Chesapeake had a new captain, Lawrence, along with young officers. She had fifty more men than the British frigate Shannon. However, many of her crew were new to the ship after being recommissioned in May, and some were relatively untrained for service on a warship. The frigates themselves were nearly equal in size and armament. But Captain Broke had been in command of the Shannon for seven years and had trained his crew to excel in naval gunnery. The ships faced off near Boston in front of thousands of spectators. Not one British shot missed its target. Every day of the Shannon's seven years of preparation showed in that fifteen-minute battle; by the time Broke led his boarders onto the Chesapeake, her fate was already sealed. The Stars and Stripes were quickly replaced by the Union Jack. Then, with Broke seriously wounded and his first lieutenant killed, command passed to Lieutenant Wallis, who sailed both ships into Halifax. This young Canadian, later known as Admiral-of-the-Fleet Sir Provo Wallis, lived to become the longest link between the Navy's past and present. He was the last survivor of those officers exempted from technical retirement for having commanded any ship or fleet during the Great War that ended at Waterloo. He was born before anyone had heard of Napoleon. He participated in a battle before Nelson died. He outlived Wellington by forty years. His name remained on the Active List for nearly all of the last decade of the nineteenth century. As an honored centenarian, he is vividly remembered by many who were still called young a century after the battle that made him famous.

The summer campaign on the Niagara frontier ended with three minor British successes. Fort Schlosser was surprised on July 5. On the 11th Bisshopp lost his life in destroying Black Rock. And on August 24 the Americans were driven in under the guns of Fort George. After this there was a lull which lasted throughout the autumn.

The summer campaign on the Niagara frontier ended with three minor British successes. Fort Schlosser was caught off guard on July 5. On the 11th, Bisshopp lost his life while destroying Black Rock. And on August 24, the Americans were pushed back under the guns of Fort George. After this, there was a pause that lasted throughout the autumn.

Down by the Montreal frontier there were three corresponding British successes. On June 3 Major Taylor of the 100th captured two American gunboats, the Growler and the Eagle, which had come to attack Isle-aux-Noix in the Richelieu river, and renamed them the Broke and the Shannon. Early in August Captains Pring and Everard, of the Navy, and Colonel Murray with nine hundred soldiers, raided Lake Champlain. They destroyed the barracks, yard, and stores at Plattsburg and sent the American militia flying home. But a still more effective blow was struck on the opposite side of Lake Champlain, at Burlington, where General Hampton was preparing the right wing of his new army of invasion. Stores, equipment, barracks, and armaments were destroyed to such an extent that Hampton's preparations were set back till late in the autumn. The left wing of the same army was at Sackett's Harbour, under Dearborn's successor, General Wilkinson, whose plan was to take Kingston, go down the St Lawrence, meet Hampton, who was to come up from the south, and then make a joint attack with him on Montreal.

Down by the Montreal border, there were three notable British victories. On June 3, Major Taylor of the 100th captured two American gunboats, the Growler and the Eagle, which had come to attack Isle-aux-Noix in the Richelieu River, and renamed them the Broke and the Shannon. In early August, Captains Pring and Everard from the Navy, along with Colonel Murray and nine hundred soldiers, raided Lake Champlain. They destroyed the barracks, yard, and supplies at Plattsburg, sending the American militia scrambling home. An even heavier blow was dealt on the opposite side of Lake Champlain in Burlington, where General Hampton was preparing the right wing of his new invasion army. Supplies, equipment, barracks, and weapons were destroyed to such an extent that Hampton's plans were delayed until late autumn. The left wing of the same army was at Sackett's Harbour, under General Wilkinson, who took over after Dearborn. His plan was to capture Kingston, proceed down the St Lawrence, meet Hampton coming up from the south, and then launch a joint attack on Montreal.

In September the scene of action shifted to the West, where the British were trying to keep the command of Lake Erie, while the Americans were trying to wrest it from them. Captain Oliver Perry, a first-rate American naval officer of only twenty-eight, was at Presqu'isle (now Erie) completing his flotilla. He had his troubles, of course, especially with the militia garrison, who would not do their proper tour of duty. 'I tell the boys to go, but the boys won't go,' was the only report forthcoming from one of several worthless colonels. A still greater trouble for Perry was getting his vessels over the bar. This had to be done without any guns on board, and with the cumbrous aid of 'camels,' which are any kind of air-tanks made fast to the sides low down, in order to raise the hull as much as possible. But, luckily for Perry, his opponent, Captain Barclay of the Royal Navy, an energetic and capable young officer of thirty-two, was called upon to face worse troubles still. Barclay was, indeed, the first to get afloat. But he had to give up the blockade of Presqu'isle, and so let Perry out, because he had the rawest of crews, the scantiest of equipment, and nothing left to eat. Then, when he ran back to Amherstburg, he found Procter also facing a state of semi-starvation, while thousands of Indian families were clamouring for food. Thus there was no other choice but either to fight or starve; for there was not the slightest chance of replenishing stores unless the line of the lake was clear.

In September, the action moved to the West, where the British were trying to maintain control of Lake Erie while the Americans worked to take it from them. Captain Oliver Perry, a top-notch American naval officer at just twenty-eight years old, was at Presqu’isle (now Erie) finishing his fleet. He faced challenges, especially with the militia garrison, which refused to fulfill their duties. "I tell the guys to go, but the guys won't go," was the only report from one of the several ineffective colonels. An even bigger challenge for Perry was getting his ships over the bar. This had to be done without any guns on board and with the cumbersome help of "camels," which are any kind of air-tanks fastened to the sides low down to elevate the hull as much as possible. Fortunately for Perry, his rival, Captain Barclay of the Royal Navy, an energetic and capable young officer at thirty-two, had even worse problems to face. Barclay was indeed the first to get his ships afloat, but he had to abandon the blockade of Presqu’isle and let Perry escape because he had the most inexperienced crew, the barest equipment, and nothing left to eat. When he returned to Amherstburg, he found Procter also dealing with near-starvation while thousands of Indian families were demanding food. Thus, there was no choice but to either fight or starve, as there was no chance of replenishing supplies unless the lake was clear.

So Barclay sailed out with his six little British vessels, armed by the odds and ends of whatever ordnance could be spared from Amherstburg and manned by almost any crews but sailors. Even the flagship Detroit had only ten real seamen, all told. Ammunition was likewise very scarce, and so defective that the guns had to be fired by the flash of a pistol. Perry also had a makeshift flotilla, partly manned by drafts from Harrison's army. But, on the whole, the odds in his favour were fairly shown by the number of vessels in the respective flotillas, nine American against the British six.

So Barclay set sail with his six small British ships, armed with whatever weapons could be spared from Amherstburg and crewed by nearly anyone except sailors. Even the flagship Detroit had only ten actual sailors in total. Ammunition was also very limited and so faulty that the guns had to be fired using a pistol’s flash. Perry had a makeshift fleet too, partly crewing it with men from Harrison's army. Overall, the odds were clearly in his favor, as shown by the number of vessels in each fleet: nine American ships compared to the British six.

Barclay had only thirty miles to make in a direct south-easterly line from Amherstburg to reach Perry at Put-in Bay in the Bass Islands, where, on the morning of September 10, the opposing forces met. The battle raged for two hours at the very closest quarters till Perry's flagship Lawrence struck to Barclay's own Detroit. But Perry had previously left the Lawrence for the fresh Niagara; and he now bore down on the battered Detroit, which had meanwhile fallen foul of the only other sizable British vessel, the Queen Charlotte. This was fatal for Barclay. The whole British flotilla surrendered after a desperate resistance and an utterly disabling loss. From that time on to the end of the war Lake Erie remained completely under American control.

Barclay had just thirty miles to travel in a straight line southeast from Amherstburg to reach Perry at Put-in Bay in the Bass Islands, where the opposing forces clashed on the morning of September 10. The battle lasted for two hours at very close range until Perry's flagship, Lawrence, surrendered to Barclay's own Detroit. However, Perry had already left the Lawrence for the fresh Niagara; and now he charged at the damaged Detroit, which had meanwhile become entangled with the only other significant British ship, the Queen Charlotte. This proved disastrous for Barclay. The entire British flotilla surrendered after a desperate fight and severe losses. From that point until the war's end, Lake Erie was completely under American control.

Procter could hardly help seeing that he was doomed to give up the whole Lake Erie region. But he lingered and was lost. While Harrison was advancing with overwhelming numbers Procter was still trying to decide when and how to abandon Amherstburg. Then, when he did go, he carried with him an inordinate amount of baggage; and he retired so slowly that Harrison caught and crushed him near Moravian Town, beside the Thames, on the 5th of October. Harrison had three thousand exultant Americans in action; Procter had barely a thousand worn-out, dispirited men, more than half of them Indians under Tecumseh. The redcoats, spread out in single rank at open order, were ridden down by Harrison's cavalry, backed by the mass of his infantry. The Indians on the inland flank stood longer and fought with great determination against five times their numbers till Tecumseh fell. Then they broke and fled. This was their last great fight and Tecumseh was their last great leader.

Procter couldn't ignore the fact that he was about to lose the entire Lake Erie area. But he hesitated and ended up getting caught. While Harrison was advancing with overwhelming numbers, Procter was still trying to figure out when and how to leave Amherstburg. When he finally did retreat, he took an excessive amount of luggage with him, and he moved so slowly that Harrison was able to catch up and defeat him near Moravian Town, by the Thames, on October 5th. Harrison had three thousand enthusiastic Americans in action, while Procter had barely a thousand exhausted, demoralized men, more than half of whom were Indians under Tecumseh. The redcoats, lined up in single file, were charged down by Harrison's cavalry, supported by a large contingent of his infantry. The Indians on the inland flank held their ground longer and fought valiantly against five times their number until Tecumseh was killed. After that, they broke and fled. This was their last major battle, and Tecumseh was their final great leader.

The scene now shifts once more to the Montreal frontier, which was being threatened by the converging forces of Hampton from the south and Wilkinson from the west. Each had about seven thousand men; and their common objective was the island of Montreal. Hampton crossed the line at Odelltown on September 20. But he presently moved back again; and it was not till October 21 that he began his definite attack by advancing down the left bank of the Chateauguay, after opening communications with Wilkinson, who was still near Sackett's Harbour. Hampton naturally expected to brush aside all the opposition that could be made by the few hundred British between him and the St Lawrence. But de Salaberry, the commander of the British advanced posts, determined to check him near La Fourche, where several little tributaries of the Chateauguay made a succession of good positions, if strengthened by abattis and held by trained defenders.

The scene now shifts again to the Montreal frontier, which was under threat from the advancing forces of Hampton from the south and Wilkinson from the west. Each had about seven thousand men, and their shared goal was the island of Montreal. Hampton crossed the border at Odelltown on September 20. However, he soon pulled back, and it wasn't until October 21 that he launched his full attack by moving down the left bank of the Chateauguay after establishing communication with Wilkinson, who was still near Sackett's Harbour. Hampton naturally expected to easily overpower the few hundred British troops standing between him and the St. Lawrence. But de Salaberry, the commander of the British forward posts, was determined to stop him near La Fourche, where several small tributaries of the Chateauguay created a series of advantageous positions that could be fortified with abattis and defended by skilled troops.

The British force was very small when Hampton began his slow advance; but 'Red George' Macdonell marched to help it just in time. Macdonell was commanding a crack corps of French Canadians, all picked from the best 'Select Embodied Militia,' and now, at the end of six months of extra service, as good as a battalion of regulars. He had hurried to Kingston when Wilkinson had threatened it from Sackett's Harbour. Now he was urgently needed at Chateauguay. 'When can you start?' asked Prevost, who was himself on the point of leaving Kingston for Chateauguay. 'Directly the men have finished their dinners, sir!' 'Then follow me as quickly as you can!' said Prevost as he stepped on board his vessel. There were 210 miles to go. A day was lost in collecting boats enough for this sudden emergency. Another day was lost en route by a gale so terrific that even the French-Canadian voyageurs were unable to face it. The rapids, where so many of Amherst's men had been drowned in 1760, were at their very worst; and the final forty miles had to be made overland by marching all night through dense forest and along a particularly difficult trail. Yet Macdonell got into touch with de Salaberry long before Prevost, to whom he had the satisfaction of reporting later in the day: 'All correct and present, sir; not one man missing!'

The British force was pretty small when Hampton started his slow advance, but 'Red George' Macdonell arrived just in time to help. Macdonell was in charge of a top-notch group of French Canadians, all selected from the best 'Select Embodied Militia,' and after six months of extra service, they were as good as a regular battalion. He rushed to Kingston when Wilkinson threatened it from Sackett's Harbour, and now he was urgently needed at Chateauguay. "When can you start?" Prevost asked, who was about to leave Kingston for Chateauguay himself. "As soon as the men finish their dinners, sir!" Macdonell replied. "Then follow me as quickly as you can!" Prevost said as he boarded his vessel. There were 210 miles to travel. A day was wasted gathering enough boats for this sudden emergency. Another day was lost on the way due to a storm so fierce that even the French-Canadian voyageurs couldn't handle it. The rapids, where many of Amherst's men had drowned in 1760, were at their worst; and the last forty miles had to be covered overland by marching all night through thick forest and along a particularly tough trail. Still, Macdonell connected with de Salaberry well before Prevost, to whom he happily reported later in the day: "All correct and present, sir; not one man missing!"

The advanced British forces under de Salaberry were now, on October 25, the eve of battle, occupying the left, or north, bank of the Chateauguay, fifteen miles south of the Cascade Rapids of the St Lawrence, twenty-five miles south-west of Caughnawaga, and thirty-five miles south-west of Montreal. Immediately in rear of these men under de Salaberry stood Macdonell's command; while, in more distant support, nearer to Montreal, stood various posts under General de Watteville, with whom Prevost spent that night and most of the 26th, the day on which the battle was fought.

The advanced British forces led by de Salaberry were now, on October 25, the night before the battle, occupying the left, or north, bank of the Chateauguay, fifteen miles south of the Cascade Rapids of the St. Lawrence, twenty-five miles southwest of Caughnawaga, and thirty-five miles southwest of Montreal. Right behind de Salaberry's troops was Macdonell's command; further back, closer to Montreal, were various posts under General de Watteville, with whom Prevost spent that night and most of the 26th, the day the battle took place.

As Hampton came on with his cumbrous American thousands de Salaberry felt justifiable confidence in his own well-disciplined French-Canadian hundreds. He and his brothers were officers in the Imperial Army. His Voltigeurs were regulars. The supporting Fencibles were also regulars, and of ten years' standing. Macdonell's men were practically regulars. The so-called 'Select Militia' present had been permanently embodied for eighteen months; and the only real militiamen on the scene of action, most of whom never came under fire at all, had already been twice embodied for service in the field. The British total present was 1590, of whom less than a quarter were militiamen and Indians. But the whole firing line comprised no more than 460, of whom only 66 were militiamen and only 22 were Indians. The Indian total was about one-tenth of the whole. The English-speaking total was about one-twentieth. It is therefore perfectly right to say that the battle of Chateauguay was practically fought and won by French-Canadian regulars against American odds of four to one.

As Hampton advanced with his large American forces, de Salaberry felt justifiably confident in his well-trained French-Canadian troops. He and his brothers were officers in the Imperial Army. His Voltigeurs were regulars. The supporting Fencibles were also regulars and had been active for ten years. Macdonell's troops were practically regulars. The so-called 'Select Militia' present had been permanently organized for eighteen months, and the only true militiamen on the battlefield, most of whom never saw combat, had already been activated for service in the field twice. The British total present was 1,590, of whom less than a quarter were militiamen and Indigenous soldiers. However, the entire firing line consisted of only 460, with just 66 being militiamen and only 22 being Indigenous. The Indigenous total was about one-tenth of the entire force. The English-speaking total was about one-twentieth. Therefore, it's fair to say that the battle of Chateauguay was essentially fought and won by French-Canadian regulars against American odds of four to one.

De Salaberry's position was peculiar. The head of his little column faced the head of Hampton's big column on a narrow front, bounded on his own left by the river Chateauguay and on his own right by woods, into which Hampton was afraid to send his untrained men. But, crossing a right-angled bend of the river, beyond de Salaberry's left front, was a ford, while in rear of de Salaberry's own column was another ford which Hampton thought he could easily take with fifteen hundred men under Purdy, as he had no idea of Macdonell's march and no doubt of being able to crush de Salaberry's other troops between his own five thousand attacking from the front and Purdy's fifteen hundred attacking from the rear. Purdy advanced overnight, crossed to the right bank of the Chateauguay, by the ford clear of de Salaberry's front, and made towards the ford in de Salaberry's rear. But his men lost their way in the dark and found themselves, not in rear of, but opposite to, and on the left flank of, de Salaberry's column in the morning. They drove in two of de Salaberry's companies, which were protecting his left flank on the right, or what was now Purdy's, side of the river; but they were checked by a third, which Macdonell sent forward, across the rear ford, at the same time that he occupied this rear ford himself. Purdy and Hampton had now completely lost touch with one another. Purdy was astounded to see Macdonell's main body of redcoats behind the rear ford. He paused, waiting for support from Hampton, who was still behind the front ford. Hampton paused, waiting for him to take the rear ford, now occupied by Macdonell. De Salaberry mounted a huge tree-stump and at once saw his opportunity. Holding back Hampton's crowded column with his own front, which fought under cover of his first abattis, he wheeled the rest of his men into line to the left and thus took Purdy in flank. Macdonell was out of range behind the rear ford; but he played his part by making his buglers sound the advance from several different quarters, while his men, joined by de Salaberry's militiamen and by the Indians in the bush, cheered vociferously and raised the war-whoop. This was too much for Purdy's fifteen hundred. They broke in confusion, ran away from the river into the woods under a storm of bullets, fired into each other, and finally disappeared. Hampton's attack on de Salaberry's first abattis then came to a full stop; after which the whole American army retired beaten from the field.

De Salaberry's position was unique. The leader of his small group faced off against the leader of Hampton's large contingent on a narrow front, with the Chateauguay River on his left and woods on his right, which Hampton was hesitant to penetrate with his inexperienced soldiers. However, beyond de Salaberry's left front was a ford crossing a right-angled bend in the river, and behind de Salaberry's column was another ford that Hampton thought he could easily capture with fifteen hundred men under Purdy, as he was unaware of Macdonell's march and was confident he could crush de Salaberry's remaining troops between his own five thousand advancing from the front and Purdy's fifteen hundred attacking from the rear. Purdy moved overnight, crossed to the right bank of the Chateauguay at a ford away from de Salaberry's front, and headed toward the ford behind de Salaberry. But his men got lost in the dark and ended up not behind but opposite and to the left of de Salaberry's column by morning. They pushed back two of de Salaberry's companies that were protecting his left flank on what was now Purdy's side of the river. Still, they were halted by a third company that Macdonell sent forward across the rear ford while he himself took control of that ford. At this point, Purdy and Hampton had completely lost contact with each other. Purdy was shocked to see Macdonell's main group of soldiers behind the rear ford. He hesitated, waiting for support from Hampton, who was still by the front ford. Hampton paused too, waiting for Purdy to take control of the rear ford, now held by Macdonell. De Salaberry climbed onto a large tree stump and immediately saw his chance. He held back Hampton's crowded column with his own forces, which fought protected by his first abattis, while he maneuvered the rest of his men into position to the left, catching Purdy from the side. Macdonell was out of range behind the rear ford, but he contributed by having his buglers sound the advance from various directions, while his soldiers, joined by de Salaberry's militia and the Indigenous allies in the bushes, cheered loudly and raised the war-whoop. This overwhelmed Purdy's fifteen hundred men. They panicked, fled from the river into the woods under a hail of bullets, accidentally fired at each other, and eventually disappeared. Hampton's assault on de Salaberry's first abattis then ground to a halt, after which the entire American army retreated defeated from the battlefield.

Ten days after Chateauguay dilatory Wilkinson, tired of waiting for defeated Hampton, left the original rendezvous at French Creek, fifty miles below Sackett's Harbour. Like Dearborn in 1812, he began his campaign just as the season was closing. But, again like Dearborn, he had the excuse of being obliged to organize his army in the middle of the war. Four days later again, on November 9, Brown, the successful defender of Sackett's Harbour against Prevost's attack in May, was landed at Williamsburg, on the Canadian side, with two thousand men, to clear the twenty miles down to Cornwall, opposite the rendezvous at St Regis, where Wilkinson expected to find Hampton ready to join him for the combined attack on Montreal. But Brown had to reckon with Dennis, the first defender of Queenston, who now commanded the little garrison of Cornwall, and who disputed every inch of the way by breaking the bridges and resisting each successive advance till Brown was compelled to deploy for attack. Two days were taken up with these harassing manoeuvres, during which another two thousand Americans were landed at Williamsburg under Boyd, who immediately found himself still more harassed in rear than Brown had been in front.

Ten days after Wilkinson, who had been dragging his feet, got tired of waiting for the defeated Hampton, he left the initial meeting place at French Creek, fifty miles south of Sackett's Harbour. Similar to Dearborn in 1812, he began his campaign just as the season was winding down. But, like Dearborn, he had the reason of needing to organize his army in the middle of the war. Four days later, on November 9, Brown, the successful defender of Sackett's Harbour against Prevost's attack in May, landed at Williamsburg on the Canadian side with two thousand men to clear the twenty miles down to Cornwall, across from the meeting point at St. Regis, where Wilkinson expected to find Hampton ready to join him for a combined attack on Montreal. However, Brown had to deal with Dennis, the first defender of Queenston, who was now in charge of the small garrison in Cornwall and blocked every inch of progress by breaking bridges and resisting each advance until Brown had to spread out for an attack. Two days were spent on these frustrating maneuvers, during which another two thousand Americans were landed at Williamsburg under Boyd, who quickly found himself facing even more trouble from behind than Brown had in front.

This new British force in Boyd's rear was only a thousand strong; but, as it included every human element engaged in the defence of Canada, it has a quite peculiar interest of its own. Afloat, it included bluejackets of the Royal Navy, men of the Provincial Marine, French-Canadian voyageurs, and Anglo-Canadian boatmen from the trading-posts, all under a first-rate fighting seaman, Captain Mulcaster, R.N. Ashore, under a good regimental leader, Colonel Morrison—whose chief staff officer was Harvey, of Stoney Creek renown—it included Imperial regulars, Canadian regulars of both races, French-Canadian and Anglo-Canadian militiamen, and a party of Indians.

This new British force behind Boyd was only a thousand strong, but since it included every group involved in the defense of Canada, it has its own unique significance. At sea, it had sailors from the Royal Navy, members of the Provincial Marine, French-Canadian voyageurs, and Anglo-Canadian boatmen from the trading posts, all led by a skilled naval officer, Captain Mulcaster, R.N. On land, under a capable regimental leader, Colonel Morrison—whose main staff officer was Harvey, known for his role at Stoney Creek—it included Imperial regulars, Canadian regulars from both backgrounds, French-Canadian and Anglo-Canadian militiamen, and a group of Indians.

Early on the 11th Brown had arrived at Cornwall with his two thousand Americans; Wilkinson was starting down from Williamsburg in boats with three thousand more, and Boyd was starting down ashore with eighteen hundred. But Mulcaster's vessels pressed in on Wilkinson's rear, while Morrison pressed in on Boyd's. Wilkinson then ordered Boyd to turn about and drive off Morrison, while he hurried his own men out of reach of Mulcaster, whose armed vessels could not follow down the rapids. Boyd thereupon attacked Morrison, and a stubborn fight ensued at Chrystler's Farm. The field was of the usual type: woods on one flank, water on the other, and a more or less flat clearing in the centre. Boyd tried hard to drive his wedge in between the British and the river. But Morrison foiled him in manoeuvre; and the eight hundred British stood fast against their eighteen hundred enemies all along the line. Boyd then withdrew, having lost four hundred men; and Morrison's remaining six hundred effectives slept on their hard-won ground.

Early on the 11th, Brown arrived in Cornwall with his two thousand Americans. Wilkinson was heading down from Williamsburg by boat with another three thousand, while Boyd was moving down on land with eighteen hundred. But Mulcaster's ships were closing in on Wilkinson's rear, while Morrison was pressing in on Boyd's. Wilkinson then ordered Boyd to turn around and drive off Morrison while he quickly moved his own men out of Mulcaster's reach, as Mulcaster's armed vessels couldn't follow them down the rapids. Boyd then attacked Morrison, and a tough battle broke out at Chrystler's Farm. The battlefield had the usual layout: woods on one side, water on the other, and a mostly flat clearing in the center. Boyd made a strong attempt to wedge his forces between the British and the river. However, Morrison countered his maneuvers, and the eight hundred British held their ground against their eighteen hundred foes along the entire line. Boyd then retreated, having lost four hundred men, while Morrison's remaining six hundred effective soldiers settled into their hard-won position for the night.

Next morning the energetic Morrison resumed his pursuit. But the campaign against Montreal was already over. Wilkinson had found that Hampton had started back for Lake Champlain while the battle was in progress; so he landed at St Regis, just inside his own country, and went into winter quarters at French Mills on the Salmon river.

Next morning, the spirited Morrison continued his pursuit. But the campaign against Montreal was already finished. Wilkinson discovered that Hampton had headed back to Lake Champlain while the battle was happening; so he landed at St. Regis, just inside his own territory, and settled into winter quarters at French Mills on the Salmon River.

In December the scene of strife changed back again to the Niagara, where the American commander, McClure, decided to evacuate Fort George. At dusk on the 10th he ordered four hundred women and children to be turned out of their homes at Newark into the biting midwinter cold, and then burnt the whole settlement down to the ground. If he had intended to hold the position he might have been justified in burning Newark, under more humane conditions, because this village undoubtedly interfered with the defensive fire of Fort George. But, as he was giving up Fort George, his act was an entirely wanton deed of shame.

In December, the conflict shifted back to Niagara, where the American commander, McClure, decided to evacuate Fort George. At dusk on the 10th, he ordered four hundred women and children to be forced out of their homes in Newark into the freezing midwinter cold, and then burned the entire settlement to the ground. If he had intended to hold the position, he might have had some justification for burning Newark under more humane circumstances, since this village definitely interfered with the defensive fire from Fort George. However, since he was abandoning Fort George, his actions were completely senseless and shameful.

Meanwhile the new British general, Gordon Drummond, second in ability to Brock alone, was hurrying to the Niagara frontier. He was preceded by Colonel Murray, who took possession of Fort George on the 12th, the day McClure crossed the Niagara river. Murray at once made a plan to take the American Fort Niagara opposite; and Drummond at once approved it for immediate execution. On the night of the 18th six hundred men were landed on the American side three miles up the river. At four the next morning Murray led them down to the fort, rushing the sentries and pickets by the way with the bayonet in dead silence. He then told off two hundred men to take a bastion at the same time that he was to lead the other four hundred straight through the main gate, which he knew would soon be opened to let the reliefs pass out. Everything worked to perfection. When the reliefs came out they were immediately charged and bayoneted, as were the first astonished men off duty who ran out of their quarters to see what the matter was. A stiff hand-to-hand fight followed. But every American attempt to form was instantly broken up; and presently the whole place surrendered. Drummond, who was delighted with such an excellent beginning, took care to underline the four significant words referring to the enemy's killed and wounded—all with the bayonet. This was done in no mere vulgar spirit of bravado, still less in abominable bloody-mindedness. It was the soldierly recognition of a particularly gallant feat of arms, carried out with such conspicuously good discipline that its memory is cherished, even to the present day, by the 100th, afterwards raised again as the Royal Canadians, and now known as the Prince of Wales's Leinster regiment. A facsimile of Drummond's underlined order is one of the most highly honoured souvenirs in the officers' mess.

Meanwhile, the new British general, Gordon Drummond, second only in skill to Brock, was rushing to the Niagara front. He was preceded by Colonel Murray, who took control of Fort George on the 12th, the same day McClure crossed the Niagara River. Murray immediately devised a plan to capture the American Fort Niagara across the river, and Drummond quickly approved it for immediate action. On the night of the 18th, six hundred men landed on the American side, three miles up the river. At four the next morning, Murray led them down to the fort, silently overpowering the sentries and pickets with bayonets. He then assigned two hundred men to capture a bastion while he led the other four hundred straight through the main gate, which he knew would soon open to let the reliefs exit. Everything went perfectly. When the reliefs came out, they were instantly charged and bayoneted, as were the first surprised men off duty who rushed out of their quarters to see what was happening. A fierce hand-to-hand battle ensued. But every attempt by the Americans to regroup was immediately disrupted, and soon the entire place surrendered. Drummond, pleased with such an excellent start, made sure to emphasize the four significant words concerning the enemy's killed and wounded—all with the bayonet. This was not done out of mere bravado, nor in a cruel or bloodthirsty manner. It was a soldier's acknowledgment of a particularly brave act of combat, executed with such impressive discipline that its memory is still honored today by the 100th, which was later reformed as the Royal Canadians, and is now known as the Prince of Wales's Leinster regiment. A replica of Drummond's underlined order is one of the most esteemed mementos in the officers' mess.

Not a moment was lost in following up this splendid feat of arms. The Indians drove the American militia out of Lewiston, which the advancing redcoats burnt to the ground. Fort Schlosser fell next, then Black Rock, and finally Buffalo. Each was laid in ashes. Thus, before 1813 ended, the whole American side of the Niagara was nothing but one long, bare line of blackened desolation, with the sole exception of Fort Niagara, which remained secure in British hands until the war was over.

Not a moment was wasted in building on this remarkable military achievement. The Indians pushed the American militia out of Lewiston, which the advancing redcoats set on fire, reducing it to ashes. Next, Fort Schlosser fell, followed by Black Rock, and finally Buffalo. Each one was destroyed. So, by the end of 1813, the entire American side of the Niagara was just one long, empty stretch of charred ruins, with the only exception being Fort Niagara, which stayed safely in British hands until the war ended.










CHAPTER VI — 1814: LUNDY'S LANE, PLATTSBURG, AND THE GREAT BLOCKADE

In the closing phase of the struggle by land and sea the fortunes of war may, with the single exception of Plattsburg, be most conveniently followed territorially, from one point to the next, along the enormous irregular curve of five thousand miles which was the scene of operations. This curve begins at Prairie du Chien, where the Wisconsin joins the Mississippi, and ends at New Orleans, where the Mississippi is about to join the sea. It runs easterly along the Wisconsin, across to the Fox, into Lake Michigan, across to Mackinaw, eastwards through Lakes Huron, Erie, and Ontario, down the St Lawrence, round to Halifax, round from there to Maine, and thence along the whole Atlantic coast, south and west—about into the Gulf of Mexico.

In the final phase of the struggle by land and sea, the outcomes of the war can be most conveniently tracked, except for Plattsburg, by following a huge, irregular curve of five thousand miles that marked the area of operations. This curve starts at Prairie du Chien, where the Wisconsin River joins the Mississippi, and ends at New Orleans, where the Mississippi is about to flow into the sea. It travels east along the Wisconsin River, crosses over to the Fox River, into Lake Michigan, across to Mackinaw, then eastward through Lakes Huron, Erie, and Ontario, down the St. Lawrence, around to Halifax, then to Maine, and finally along the entire Atlantic coast, south and west, all the way into the Gulf of Mexico.

The blockade of the Gulf of Mexico was an integral part of the British plan. But the battle of New Orleans, which was a complete disaster for the British arms, stands quite outside the actual war, since it was fought on January 8, 1815, more than two weeks after the terms of peace had been settled by the Treaty of Ghent. This peculiarity about its date, taken in conjunction with its extreme remoteness from the Canadian frontier, puts it beyond the purview of the present chronicle.

The blockade of the Gulf of Mexico was a key part of the British strategy. However, the battle of New Orleans, which turned out to be a total failure for the British, is somewhat separate from the actual war, as it was fought on January 8, 1815, more than two weeks after the peace terms were agreed upon in the Treaty of Ghent. This unusual timing, along with its significant distance from the Canadian border, places it outside the scope of this account.

All the decisive actions of the campaign proper were fought within two months. They began at Prairie du Chien in July and ended at Plattsburg in September. Plattsburg is the one exception to the order of place. The tide of war and British fortune flowed east and south to reach its height at Washington in August. It turned at Plattsburg in September.

All the key battles of the actual campaign took place within two months. They started at Prairie du Chien in July and wrapped up at Plattsburg in September. Plattsburg is the only exception to the sequence of locations. The momentum of the war and British success moved east and south, peaking in Washington in August. It shifted at Plattsburg in September.

Neither friend nor foe went west in 1813. But in April 1814 Colonel McDouall set out with ninety men, mostly of the Newfoundland regiment, to reinforce Mackinaw. He started from the little depot which had been established on the Nottawasaga, a river flowing into the Georgian Bay and accessible by the overland trail from York.

Neither friend nor foe went west in 1813. But in April 1814, Colonel McDouall set out with ninety men, mostly from the Newfoundland regiment, to reinforce Mackinaw. He started from the small depot that had been established on the Nottawasaga, a river flowing into Georgian Bay and reachable by the overland trail from York.

After surmounting the many difficulties of the inland route which he had to take in order to avoid the Americans in the Lake Erie region, and after much hard work against the Lake Huron ice, he at last reached Mackinaw on the 18th of May. Some good fighting Indians joined him there; and towards the end of June he felt strong enough to send Colonel McKay against the American post at Prairie du Chien. McKay arrived at this post in the middle of July and captured the whole position—fort, guns, garrison, and a vessel on the Mississippi.

After overcoming the many challenges of the inland route he had to take to steer clear of the Americans in the Lake Erie area, and after a lot of hard work battling the ice on Lake Huron, he finally arrived at Mackinaw on May 18th. Some skilled fighting Indians joined him there, and by the end of June, he felt strong enough to send Colonel McKay to attack the American post at Prairie du Chien. McKay reached this post in mid-July and took control of the entire position—fort, guns, garrison, and a vessel on the Mississippi.

Meanwhile seven hundred Americans under Croghan, the American officer who had repulsed Procter at Fort Stephenson the year before, were making for Mackinaw itself. They did some private looting at the Sault, burnt the houses at St Joseph's Island, and landed in full force at Mackinaw on the 4th of August. McDouall had less than two hundred men, Indians included. But he at once marched out to the attack and beat the Americans back to their ships, which immediately sailed away. The British thenceforth commanded the whole three western lakes until the war was over.

Meanwhile, seven hundred Americans led by Croghan, the officer who had defeated Procter at Fort Stephenson the year before, were heading for Mackinaw itself. They did some looting at the Sault, burned the houses on St. Joseph's Island, and landed in full force at Mackinaw on August 4th. McDouall had fewer than two hundred men, including Indians. However, he immediately marched out to confront them and pushed the Americans back to their ships, which quickly sailed away. From that point on, the British controlled all three western lakes until the war ended.

The Lake Erie region remained quite as decisively commanded by the Americans. They actually occupied only the line of the Detroit. But they had the power to cut any communications which the British might try to establish along the north side of the lake. They had suffered a minor reverse at Chatham in the previous December. But in March they more than turned the tables by defeating Basden's attack in the Longwoods at Delaware, near London; and in October seven hundred of their mounted men raided the line of the Thames and only just stopped short of the Grand River, the western boundary of the Niagara peninsula.

The Lake Erie region was firmly under American control. They only occupied the Detroit line, but they had the ability to disrupt any communications the British attempted to establish along the north side of the lake. They experienced a minor setback at Chatham the previous December, but in March they turned things around by defeating Basden's attack in the Longwoods at Delaware, near London. In October, seven hundred of their mounted troops raided the Thames line and nearly reached the Grand River, which marks the western edge of the Niagara peninsula.

The Niagara frontier, as before, was the scene of desperate strife. The Americans were determined to wrest it from the British, and they carefully trained their best troops for the effort. Their prospects seemed bright, as the whole of Upper Canada was suffering from want of men and means, both civil and military. Drummond, the British commander-in-chief there, felt very anxious not only about the line of the Niagara but even about the neck of the whole peninsula, from Burlington westward to Lake Erie. He had no more than 4,400 troops, all told; and he was obliged to place them so as to be ready for an attack either from the Niagara or from Lake Erie, or from both together. Keeping his base at York with a thousand men, he formed his line with its right on Burlington and its left on Fort Niagara. He had 500 men at Burlington, 1,000 at Fort George, and 700 at Fort Niagara. The rest were thrown well forward, so as to get into immediate touch with any Americans advancing from the south. There were 300 men at Queenston, 500 at Chippawa, 150 at Fort Erie, and 250 at Long Point on Lake Erie.

The Niagara frontier, as it had been before, was the site of intense conflict. The Americans were set on taking it from the British, and they meticulously trained their best troops for the task. Their outlook appeared promising, as all of Upper Canada was struggling with a lack of personnel and resources, both civil and military. Drummond, the British commander-in-chief there, was quite worried not only about the Niagara line but also about the entire neck of the peninsula, from Burlington westward to Lake Erie. He had no more than 4,400 troops in total; and he had to position them to be ready for an attack from either Niagara or Lake Erie, or from both at the same time. Keeping his base at York with a thousand men, he set up his line with its right at Burlington and its left at Fort Niagara. He stationed 500 men at Burlington, 1,000 at Fort George, and 700 at Fort Niagara. The rest were moved well forward to make contact with any Americans coming from the south. There were 300 men at Queenston, 500 at Chippawa, 150 at Fort Erie, and 250 at Long Point on Lake Erie.

Brown, the American general who had beaten Prevost at Sackett's Harbour and who had now superseded Wilkinson, had made his advanced field base at Buffalo. His total force was not much more than Drummond's. But it was all concentrated into a single striking body which possessed the full initiative of manoeuvre and attack. On July 3 Brown crossed the Niagara to the Canadian side. The same day he took Fort Erie from its little garrison; and at once began to make it a really formidable work, as the British found out to their cost later on. Next day he advanced down the river road to Street's Creek. On hearing this, General Riall, Drummond's second-in-command, gathered two thousand men and advanced against Brown, who had recommenced his own advance with four thousand. They met on the 5th, between Street's Creek and the Chippawa river. Riall at once sent six hundred men, including all his Indians and militia, against more than twice their number of American militia, who were in a strong position on the inland flank. The Canadians went forward in excellent style and the Americans broke and fled in wild confusion. Seizing such an apparently good chance, Riall then attacked the American regulars with his own, though the odds he had to face here were more than three against two. The opposing lines met face to face unflinchingly. The Americans, who had now been trained and disciplined by proper leaders, refused to yield an inch. Their two regular brigadiers, Winfield Scott and Ripley, kept them well in hand, manoeuvred their surplus battalions to the best advantage, overlapped the weaker British flank, and won the day. The British loss was five hundred, or one in four: the American four hundred, or only one in ten.

Brown, the American general who had defeated Prevost at Sackett's Harbour and had now taken over from Wilkinson, set up his main base at Buffalo. His total force was not much larger than Drummond's but was all concentrated into a single striking unit that had complete control over movement and attack. On July 3, Brown crossed the Niagara River to the Canadian side. On the same day, he took Fort Erie from its small garrison and immediately began fortifying it into a significant stronghold, as the British would later realize to their detriment. The next day, he advanced down the river road toward Street's Creek. Upon hearing this, General Riall, Drummond's second-in-command, gathered two thousand men and moved against Brown, who had resumed his advance with four thousand troops. They clashed on the 5th, between Street's Creek and the Chippawa River. Riall promptly sent six hundred men, including all his Indians and militia, against more than double the number of American militia, who were in a strong position on the inland flank. The Canadians advanced effectively, leading the Americans to break and flee in panic. Seizing what seemed like a great opportunity, Riall then attacked the American regulars with his own troops, despite facing odds of more than three to two. The opposing lines stood firm. The Americans, now well-trained and led by competent leaders, refused to give an inch. Their two regular brigadiers, Winfield Scott and Ripley, managed their troops effectively, maneuvering their extra battalions to their advantage, overlapping the weaker British flank and securing victory. The British casualties amounted to five hundred, or one in four, while the Americans suffered four hundred, or only one in ten.

Brown then turned Riall's flank, by crossing the Chippawa higher up, and prepared for the crowning triumph of crushing Drummond. He proposed a joint attack with Chauncey on Forts Niagara and George. But Chauncey happened to be ill at the time; he had not yet defeated Yeo; and he strongly resented being made apparently subordinate to Brown. So the proposed combination failed at the critical moment. But, for the eighteen days between the battle of Chippawa on the 5th of July and Brown's receipt of Chauncey's refusal on the 23rd, the Americans carried all before them, right up to the British line that ran along the western end of Lake Ontario, from Fort Niagara to Burlington. During this period no great operations took place. But two minor incidents served to exasperate feelings on both sides. Eight Canadian traitors were tried and hanged at Ancaster near Burlington; and Loyalists openly expressed their regret that Willcocks and others had escaped the same fate. Willcocks had been the ring-leader of the parliamentary opposition to Brock in 1812; and had afterwards been exceedingly active on the American side, harrying every Loyalist he and his raiders could lay their hands on. He ended by cheating the gallows, after all, as he fell in a skirmish towards the end of the present campaign on the Niagara frontier. The other exasperating incident was the burning of St David's on July 19 by a Colonel Stone; partly because it was a 'Tory village' and partly because the American militia mistakenly thought that one of their officers, Brigadier-General Swift, had been killed by a prisoner to whom he had given quarter.

Brown then outflanked Riall by crossing the Chippawa further upstream and got ready for the ultimate victory of defeating Drummond. He planned a joint attack with Chauncey on Forts Niagara and George. However, Chauncey was ill at the time; he had not yet beaten Yeo; and he was quite upset about being seemingly subordinate to Brown. So, the proposed collaboration fell apart at a crucial moment. But for the eighteen days between the battle of Chippawa on July 5 and Brown's receipt of Chauncey’s refusal on the 23rd, the Americans had the upper hand, advancing all the way to the British line that stretched along the western end of Lake Ontario, from Fort Niagara to Burlington. During this time, there were no major operations. However, two minor incidents increased tensions on both sides. Eight Canadian traitors were tried and hanged at Ancaster near Burlington, and Loyalists openly expressed their disappointment that Willcocks and others had escaped the same fate. Willcocks had been the leader of the parliamentary opposition to Brock in 1812 and had later been very active on the American side, targeting every Loyalist he and his raiders could find. He ultimately avoided the gallows, however, as he was killed in a skirmish towards the end of the current campaign on the Niagara frontier. The other aggravating incident was the burning of St David's on July 19 by Colonel Stone, partly because it was a 'Tory village' and partly because the American militia mistakenly believed that one of their officers, Brigadier-General Swift, had been killed by a prisoner he had spared.

When, on the 23rd of July, Brown at last received Chauncey's disappointing answer, he immediately stopped manoeuvring along the lower Niagara and prepared to execute an alternative plan of marching diagonally across the Niagara peninsula straight for the British position at Burlington. To do this he concentrated at the Chippawa on the 24th. But by the time he was ready to put his plan into execution, on the morning of the 25th, he found himself in close touch with the British in his immediate front. Their advanced guard of a thousand men, under Colonel Pearson, had just taken post at Lundy's Lane, near the Falls. Their main body, under Riall, was clearing both banks of the lower Niagara. And Drummond himself had just arrived at Fort Niagara. Neither side knew the intentions of the other. But as the British were clearing the whole country up to the Falls, and as the Americans were bent on striking diagonally inland from a point beside the Falls, it inevitably happened that each met the other at Lundy's Lane, which runs inland from the Canadian side of the Falls, at right angles to the river, and therefore between the two opposing armies.

When Brown finally got Chauncey's disappointing reply on July 23rd, he immediately stopped maneuvering along the lower Niagara and prepared to execute an alternative plan of marching diagonally across the Niagara peninsula straight toward the British position at Burlington. To do this, he gathered his forces at Chippawa on the 24th. But by the time he was ready to put his plan into action on the morning of the 25th, he found himself in close proximity to the British in front of him. Their advance guard of a thousand men, led by Colonel Pearson, had just taken position at Lundy's Lane, near the Falls. Their main force, under Riall, was clearing both banks of the lower Niagara. And Drummond had just arrived at Fort Niagara. Neither side knew what the other was planning. But since the British were clearing the area up to the Falls and the Americans aimed to move diagonally inland from a spot near the Falls, it was inevitable that they would meet at Lundy's Lane, which runs inland from the Canadian side of the Falls at a right angle to the river, placing them between the two opposing armies.

When Drummond, hurrying across from York, landed at Fort Niagara in the early morning of the fateful 25th, he found that the orders he had sent over on the 23rd were already being carried out, though in a slightly modified form. Colonel Tucker was marching off from Fort Niagara to Lewiston, which he took without opposition. Then, first making sure that the heights beyond were also clear, he crossed over the Niagara to Queenston, where his men had dinner with those who had marched up on the Canadian side from Fort George. Immediately after dinner half the total sixteen hundred present marched back to garrison Forts George and Niagara, while the other half marched forward, up-stream, on the Canadian side, with Drummond, towards Lundy's Lane, whither Riall had preceded them with reinforcements for the advanced guard under Colonel Pearson. In the meantime Brown had heard about the taking of Lewiston, and, fearing that the British might take Fort Schlosser too, had at once given up all idea of his diagonal march on Burlington and had decided to advance straight against Queenston instead. Thus both the American and the British main bodies were marching on Lundy's Lane from opposite sides and in successive detachments throughout that long, intensely hot, midsummer afternoon.

When Drummond hurried across from York and arrived at Fort Niagara early in the morning on the fateful 25th, he discovered that the orders he had sent on the 23rd were already being carried out, though in a slightly altered way. Colonel Tucker was marching from Fort Niagara to Lewiston, which he captured without any resistance. After confirming that the heights beyond were also clear, he crossed the Niagara to Queenston, where his men had dinner with those who had marched up on the Canadian side from Fort George. Right after dinner, half of the total sixteen hundred troops present marched back to garrison Forts George and Niagara, while the other half moved forward, upstream on the Canadian side, with Drummond toward Lundy's Lane, where Riall had already gone ahead with reinforcements for the advanced guard under Colonel Pearson. In the meantime, Brown had learned about the capture of Lewiston and, fearing that the British might also take Fort Schlosser, immediately abandoned any plans for his diagonal march on Burlington and decided to advance straight toward Queenston instead. So both the American and British main forces were marching on Lundy's Lane from opposite sides in successive detachments throughout that long, scorching midsummer afternoon.

Presently Riall got a report saying that the Americans were advancing in one massed force instead of in successive detachments. He thereupon ordered Pearson to retire from Lundy's Lane to Queenston, sent back orders that Colonel Hercules Scott, who was marching up twelve hundred men from near St Catharine's on Twelve Mile Creek, was also to go to Queenston, and reported both these changes to Drummond, who was hurrying along the Queenston road towards Lundy's Lane as fast as he could. While the orderly officers were galloping back to Drummond and Hercules Scott, and while Pearson was getting his men into their order of march, Winfield Scott's brigade of American regulars suddenly appeared on the Chippawa road, deployed for attack, and halted. There was a pause on both sides. Winfield Scott thought he might have Drummond's whole force in front of him. Riall thought he was faced by the whole of Brown's. But Winfield Scott, presently realizing that Pearson was unsupported, resumed his advance; while Pearson and Riall, not realizing that Winfield Scott was himself unsupported for the time being, immediately began to retire.

Right now, Riall received a report stating that the Americans were advancing as a single unit instead of in staggered groups. He then ordered Pearson to withdraw from Lundy's Lane to Queenston, sent back orders for Colonel Hercules Scott, who was bringing 1,200 men from near St. Catharines on Twelve Mile Creek, to also head to Queenston, and informed Drummond of these changes, who was rushing along the Queenston road towards Lundy's Lane as quickly as possible. While the orderly officers were racing back to Drummond and Hercules Scott, and while Pearson was organizing his men for the march, Winfield Scott's brigade of American regulars suddenly appeared on the Chippawa road, ready to attack, and stopped. There was a moment of stillness on both sides. Winfield Scott thought he might be facing Drummond's entire force. Riall believed he was up against all of Brown's troops. But Winfield Scott, soon realizing that Pearson was alone, continued his advance; meanwhile, Pearson and Riall, unaware that Winfield Scott was also unsupported at that moment, began to pull back.

At this precise moment Drummond dashed up and drew rein. There was not a minute to lose. The leading Americans were coming on in excellent order, only a musket-shot away; Pearson's thousand were just in the act of giving up the key to the whole position; and Drummond's eight hundred were plodding along a mile or so in rear. But within that fleeting minute Drummond made the plan that brought on the most desperately contested battle of the war. He ordered Pearson's thousand back again. He brought his own eight hundred forward at full speed. He sent post-haste to Colonel Scott to change once more and march on Lundy's Lane. And so, by the time the astonished Americans were about to seize the key themselves, they found him ready to defend it.

At that exact moment, Drummond rushed up and pulled his horse to a stop. There was no time to waste. The lead American forces were advancing in great formation, only a musket-shot away; Pearson's thousand were just about to give up control of the entire position; and Drummond's eight hundred were trudging along a mile or so behind. But in that fleeting minute, Drummond came up with the plan that led to the fiercest battle of the war. He ordered Pearson's thousand to retreat. He quickly moved his own eight hundred forward at full speed. He urgently sent a message to Colonel Scott to change direction once again and march toward Lundy's Lane. By the time the stunned Americans were ready to take control, they found him prepared to defend it.

Too long for a hillock, too low for a hill, this key to the whole position in that stern fight has never had a special name. But it may well be known as Battle Rise. It stood a mile from the Niagara river, and just a step inland beyond the crossing of two roads. One of these, Lundy's Lane, ran lengthwise over it, at right angles to the Niagara. The other, which did not quite touch it, ran in the same direction as the river, all the way from Fort Erie to Fort George, and, of course, through both Chippawa and Queenston. The crest of Battle Rise was a few yards on the Chippawa side of Lundy's Lane; and there Drummond placed his seven field-guns. Round these guns the thickest of the battle raged, from first to last. The odds were four thousand Americans against three thousand British, altogether. But the British were in superior force at first; and neither side had its full total in action at any one time, as casualties and reinforcements kept the numbers fluctuating.

Too long to be called a hillock, but too short to be a hill, this crucial location in that fierce battle has never been given a specific name. But it can be referred to as Battle Rise. It was located a mile from the Niagara River and just a step inland past the intersection of two roads. One of these, Lundy's Lane, ran straight over it, crossing at right angles to the Niagara. The other road, which didn't quite touch it, ran parallel to the river, stretching all the way from Fort Erie to Fort George, passing through both Chippawa and Queenston. The top of Battle Rise was a few yards on the Chippawa side of Lundy's Lane, where Drummond positioned his seven field guns. Around these guns, the fiercest part of the battle unfolded from beginning to end. The odds were four thousand Americans against three thousand British overall. However, the British had the advantage initially; neither side had its full strength in action at any given time because casualties and reinforcements kept changing the numbers.

It was past six in the evening of that stifling 25th of July when Winfield Scott attacked with the utmost steadiness and gallantry. Though the British outnumbered his splendid brigade, and though they had the choice of ground as well, he still succeeded in driving a wedge through their left flank, a move which threatened to break them away from the road along the river. But they retired in good order, re-formed, and then drove out his wedge.

It was after six in the evening on that sweltering July 25th when Winfield Scott launched his attack with great steadiness and bravery. Even though the British outnumbered his impressive brigade and had the advantage of the terrain, he managed to penetrate their left flank, a move that risked separating them from the road by the river. However, they pulled back in an orderly manner, regrouped, and then pushed back against his advance.

By half-past seven the American army had all come into action, and Drummond was having hard work to hold his own. Brown, like Winfield Scott, at once saw the supreme importance of taking Battle Rise; so he sent two complete battalions against it, one of regulars leading, the other, of militia, in support. At the first salvo from Drummond's seven guns the American militia broke and ran away. But Colonel Miller worked some of the American regulars very cleverly along the far side of a creeper-covered fence, while the rest engaged the battery from a distance. In the heat of action the British artillerymen never saw their real danger till, on a given signal, Miller's advanced party all sprang up and fired a point-blank volley which killed or wounded every man beside the guns. Then Miller charged and took the battery. But he only held it for a moment. The British centre charged up their own side of Battle Rise and drove the intruders back, after a terrific struggle with the bayonet. But again success was only for the moment. The Americans rallied and pressed the British back. The British then rallied and returned. And so the desperate fight swayed back and forth across the coveted position; till finally both sides retired exhausted, and the guns stood dumb between them.

By seven-thirty, the American army was fully engaged, and Drummond was struggling to keep up. Brown, like Winfield Scott, immediately recognized the critical importance of taking Battle Rise, so he sent in two full battalions: one of regulars leading the way and the other of militia providing support. At the first shot from Drummond's seven cannons, the American militia panicked and fled. However, Colonel Miller skillfully maneuvered some American regulars along the far side of a vine-covered fence, while the rest attacked the battery from a distance. In the heat of combat, the British artillerymen didn’t realize their true danger until, at a given signal, Miller's advancing troops suddenly stood up and fired a direct volley that killed or wounded every man next to the guns. Then, Miller charged and captured the battery, but he only held it for a moment. The British center launched a counterattack up their side of Battle Rise and pushed the intruders back after a fierce bayonet fight. But once again, the success was short-lived. The Americans regrouped and pressed the British back. The British then rallied and fought back. The desperate battle swayed back and forth over the coveted position until finally both sides withdrew, exhausted, leaving the guns silent between them.

It was now pitch-dark, and the lull that followed seemed almost like the end of the fight. But, after a considerable pause, the Americans—all regulars this time—came on once more. This put the British in the greatest danger. Drummond had lost nearly a third of his men. The effective American regulars were little less than double his present twelve hundred effectives of all kinds and were the fresher army of the two. Miller had taken one of the guns from Battle Rise. The other six could not be served against close-quarter musketry; and the nearest Americans were actually resting between the cross-roads and the deserted Rise. Defeat looked certain for the British. But, just as the attackers and defenders began to stir again, Colonel Hercules Scott's twelve hundred weary reinforcements came plodding along the Queenston road, wheeled round the corner into Lundy's Lane, and stumbled in among these nearest Americans, who, being the more expectant of the two, drove them back in confusion. The officers, however, rallied the men at once. Drummond told off eight hundred of them, including three hundred militia, to the reserve; prolonged his line to the right with the rest; and thus re-established the defence.

It was now pitch dark, and the silence that followed felt almost like the end of the battle. But after a long pause, the Americans—all regular troops this time—charged again. This put the British in serious jeopardy. Drummond had lost almost a third of his soldiers. The effective American regulars were nearly double his current twelve hundred troops of all kinds and were the fresher side. Miller had captured one of the guns from Battle Rise. The other six couldn’t be used against close-range musket fire; and the nearest Americans were actually resting between the crossroads and the abandoned Rise. Defeat seemed inevitable for the British. But just as the attackers and defenders were about to move again, Colonel Hercules Scott's twelve hundred exhausted reinforcements arrived, trudging down the Queenston road, turned the corner onto Lundy's Lane, and stumbled right into the nearest Americans, who, being more prepared, pushed them back in confusion. However, the officers quickly rallied their troops. Drummond sent eight hundred of them, including three hundred militia, to the reserve; extended his line to the right with the rest; and thus re-established the defense.

Hardly had the new arrivals taken breath before the final assault began. Again the Americans took the silent battery. Again the British drove them back. Again the opposing lines swayed to and fro across the deadly crest of Battle Rise, with nothing else to guide them through the hot, black night but their own flaming musketry. The Americans could not have been more gallant and persistent in attack: the British could not have been more steadfast in defence. Midnight came; but neither side could keep its hold on Battle Rise. By this time Drummond was wounded; and Riall was both wounded and a prisoner. Among the Americans Brown and Winfield Scott were also wounded, while their men were worn out after being under arms for nearly eighteen hours. A pause of sheer exhaustion followed. Then, slowly and sullenly, as if they knew the one more charge they could not make must carry home, the foiled Americans turned back and felt their way to Chippawa.

Hardly had the new arrivals caught their breath before the final assault started. Once again, the Americans captured the silent battery. Once again, the British pushed them back. Once again, both sides struggled back and forth across the deadly peak of Battle Rise, with only their own blazing gunfire to guide them through the hot, dark night. The Americans couldn’t have been more brave and persistent in their attacks; the British couldn’t have been more determined in their defense. Midnight arrived, but neither side could maintain its hold on Battle Rise. By this point, Drummond was wounded, and Riall was both wounded and a prisoner. Among the Americans, Brown and Winfield Scott were also injured, while their troops were exhausted after being in the fight for nearly eighteen hours. A moment of pure exhaustion followed. Then, slowly and reluctantly, as if they knew that the one last charge they couldn't make would have to carry them home, the beaten Americans turned back and made their way to Chippawa.

The British ranks lay down in the same order as that in which they fought; and a deep hush fell over the whole, black-shrouded battlefield. The immemorial voice of those dread Falls to which no combatant gave heed for six long hours of mortal strife was heard once more. But near at hand there was no other sound than that which came from the whispered queries of a few tired officers on duty; from the busy orderlies and surgeons at their work of mercy; and from the wounded moaning in their pain. So passed the quiet half of that short, momentous, summer night. Within four hours the sun shone down on the living and the dead—on that silent battery whose gunners had fallen to a man—on the unconquered Rise.

The British troops lay down in the same order they had fought, and a deep silence settled over the entire, black-shrouded battlefield. The ancient echoes of those dreaded Falls, which no fighter paid attention to during six long hours of fierce struggle, were heard once again. But nearby, the only sounds came from the whispered questions of a few exhausted officers on duty, the busy orderlies and surgeons tending to the injured, and the wounded moaning in their pain. This is how the quiet part of that brief, significant summer night passed. Within four hours, the sun shone down on both the living and the dead—on that silent battery where all the gunners had fallen—on the unconquered Rise.

The tide of war along the Niagara frontier favoured neither side for some time after Lundy's Lane, though the Americans twice appeared to be regaining the initiative. On August 15 there was a well-earned American victory at Fort Erie, where Drummond's assault was beaten off with great loss to the British. A month later an American sortie was repulsed. On September 21 Drummond retired beaten; and on October 13 he found himself again on the defensive at Chippawa, with little more than three thousand men, while Izard, who had come with American reinforcements from Lake Champlain and Sackett's Harbour, was facing him with twice as many. But Yeo's fleet had now come up to the mouth of the Niagara, while Chauncey's had remained at Sackett's Harbour. Thus the British had the priceless advantage of a movable naval base at hand, while the Americans had none at all within supporting distance. Every step towards Lake Ontario hampered Izard more and more, while it added corresponding strength to Drummond. An American attempt to work round Drummond's flank, twelve miles inland, was also foiled by a heavy skirmish on October 19 at Cook's Mills; and Izard's definite abandonment of the invasion was announced on November 5 by his blowing up Fort Erie and retiring into winter quarters. This ended the war along the whole Niagara.

The war along the Niagara frontier didn't favor either side for some time after Lundy's Lane, even though the Americans seemed to regain the initiative twice. On August 15, the Americans achieved a well-deserved victory at Fort Erie, where Drummond's attack was repelled with significant losses for the British. A month later, an American attack was turned back. On September 21, Drummond withdrew, defeated; and on October 13, he found himself on the defensive again at Chippawa, with just over three thousand men, while Izard, who had arrived with American reinforcements from Lake Champlain and Sackett's Harbour, faced him with double the troops. However, Yeo's fleet had now arrived at the mouth of the Niagara, while Chauncey’s had stayed at Sackett’s Harbour. Thus, the British had the invaluable advantage of a mobile naval base nearby, while the Americans had none within supportive range. Each advance toward Lake Ontario further hindered Izard while boosting Drummond's strength. An American effort to flank Drummond, twelve miles inland, was also thwarted during a heavy skirmish on October 19 at Cook's Mills; and Izard's final decision to abandon the invasion was announced on November 5 when he blew up Fort Erie and retreated into winter quarters. This marked the end of the war along the entire Niagara.

The campaign on Lake Ontario was very different. It opened two months earlier. The naval competition consisted rather in building than in fighting. The British built ships in Kingston, the Americans in Sackett's Harbour; and reports of progress soon travelled across the intervening space of less than forty miles. The initiative of combined operations by land and water was undertaken by the British instead of by the Americans. Yeo and Drummond wished to attack Sackett's Harbour with four thousand men. But Prevost said he could spare them only three thousand; whereupon they changed their objective to Oswego, which they took in excellent style, on May 6. The British suffered a serious reverse, though on a very much smaller scale, on May 30, at Sandy Creek, between Oswego and Sackett's Harbour, when a party of marines and bluejackets, sent to cut out some vessels with naval stores for Chauncey, was completely lost, every man being either killed, wounded, or taken prisoner.

The campaign on Lake Ontario was quite different. It started two months earlier. The naval competition involved more building than fighting. The British constructed ships in Kingston while the Americans did so in Sackett's Harbour, and news of their progress quickly spread across the less than forty-mile gap. The British took the lead in coordinating land and water operations instead of the Americans. Yeo and Drummond planned to attack Sackett's Harbour with four thousand men. However, Prevost said he could only spare three thousand, so they changed their target to Oswego, which they captured successfully on May 6. The British faced a significant setback, albeit on a much smaller scale, on May 30 at Sandy Creek, between Oswego and Sackett's Harbour, when a group of marines and sailors sent to seize vessels carrying naval supplies for Chauncey ended up being completely lost, with every person either killed, wounded, or captured.

From Lake Ontario down to the sea the Canadian frontier was never seriously threatened; and the only action of any consequence was fought to the south of Montreal in the early spring. On March 30 the Americans made a last inglorious attempt in this direction. Wilkinson started with four thousand men to follow the line of Lake Champlain and the Richelieu river, the same that was tried by Dearborn in 1812 and by Hampton in 1813. At La Colle, only four miles across the frontier, he attacked Major Handcock's post of two hundred men. The result was like a second Chateauguay. Handcock drew in three hundred reinforcements and two gunboats from Isle-aux-Noix. Wilkinson's advanced guard lost its way overnight. In the morning he lacked the resolution to press on, even with his overwhelming numbers; and so, after a part of his army had executed some disjointed manoeuvres, he withdrew the whole and gave up in despair.

From Lake Ontario down to the sea, the Canadian frontier was never really threatened; the only significant battle took place south of Montreal in early spring. On March 30, the Americans made one last unsuccessful attempt in this direction. Wilkinson set out with four thousand men to follow the route of Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River, the same one attempted by Dearborn in 1812 and by Hampton in 1813. At La Colle, just four miles across the border, he attacked Major Handcock's post of two hundred men. The outcome was similar to a second Chateauguay. Handcock brought in three hundred reinforcements and two gunboats from Isle-aux-Noix. Wilkinson's advanced guard got lost overnight. In the morning, he didn’t have the determination to continue, even with his large numbers; so after part of his army carried out some disjointed maneuvers, he pulled back completely and gave up in despair.

From this point of the Canadian frontier to the very end of the five-thousand-mile loop, that is, from Montreal to Mexico, the theatre of operations was directly based upon the sea, where the British Navy was by this time undisputedly supreme. A very few small American men-of-war were still at large, together with a much greater number of privateers. But they had no power whatever even to mitigate the irresistible blockade of the whole coast-line of the United States. American sea-borne commerce simply died away; for no mercantile marine could have any independent life when its trade had to be carried on by a constantly decreasing tonnage; when, too, it could go to sea at all only by furtive evasion, and when it had to take cargo at risks so great that they could not be covered either by insurance or by any attainable profits. The Atlantic being barred by this Great Blockade, and the Pacific being inaccessible, the only practical way left open to American trade was through the British lines by land or sea. Some American seamen shipped in British vessels. Some American ships sailed under British colours. But the chief external American trade was done illicitly, by 'underground,' with the British West Indies and with Canada itself. This was, of course, in direct defiance of the American government, and to the direct detriment of the United States as a nation. It was equally to the direct benefit of the British colonies in general and of Nova Scotia in particular. American harbours had never been so dull. Quebec and Halifax had never been so prosperous. American money was drained away from the warlike South and West and either concentrated in the Northern States—which were opposed to the war—or paid over into British hands.

From this point on the Canadian frontier to the very end of the five-thousand-mile loop, that is, from Montreal to Mexico, the battleground was directly connected to the sea, where at this point the British Navy was undeniably dominant. A few small American warships were still out there, along with a much larger number of privateers. But they had no power whatsoever to even ease the relentless blockade of the entire coastline of the United States. American sea-borne trade simply dwindled; no commercial fleet could maintain any independent existence when its business had to operate with a constantly shrinking number of ships; when it could only venture out to sea through secretive means, and when it had to take cargoes with risks so high that they could not be insured or covered by any reasonable profits. With the Atlantic closed off by this Great Blockade and the Pacific out of reach, the only viable route left for American trade was through British territories by land or sea. Some American sailors took jobs on British ships. Some American vessels sailed under British flags. But most external American trade occurred illegally, through 'underground' channels, with the British West Indies and Canada itself. This was, of course, in direct defiance of the American government, and it was detrimental to the United States as a nation. It was equally beneficial to the British colonies in general and to Nova Scotia in particular. American ports had never been so quiet. Quebec and Halifax had never been so thriving. American money was drained away from the war-torn South and West and either concentrated in the Northern States—which opposed the war—or funneled into British hands.

Nor was this all. The British Navy harried the coast in every convenient quarter and made effective the work of two most important joint attacks, one on Maine, the other on Washington itself. The attack on Maine covered two months, altogether, from July 11 to September 11. It began with the taking of Moose Island by Sir Thomas Hardy, Nelson's old flag-captain at Trafalgar, and ended with the surrender, at Machias, of 'about 100 miles of sea-coast,' together with 'that intermediate tract of country which separates the province of New Brunswick from Lower Canada.' On September 21 Sir John Sherbrooke proclaimed at Halifax the formal annexation of 'all the eastern side of the Penobscot river and all the country lying between the same river and the boundary of New Brunswick.'

Nor was this all. The British Navy attacked the coast wherever they could and made effective the work of two significant joint assaults, one on Maine and the other directly on Washington. The attack on Maine lasted two months, from July 11 to September 11. It started with the capture of Moose Island by Sir Thomas Hardy, Nelson's old flag captain at Trafalgar, and concluded with the surrender at Machias of 'about 100 miles of sea coast,' along with 'the stretch of land that separates the province of New Brunswick from Lower Canada.' On September 21, Sir John Sherbrooke announced at Halifax the formal annexation of 'all the eastern side of the Penobscot River and all the land lying between the same river and the boundary of New Brunswick.'

The attack on Maine was meant, in one sense at least, to create a partial counterpoise to the American preponderance on Lake Erie. The attack on Washington was made in retaliation for the burning of the old and new capitals of Upper Canada, Newark and York.

The attack on Maine was intended, in one way at least, to balance out America's dominance on Lake Erie. The attack on Washington was a response to the burning of the old and new capitals of Upper Canada, Newark and York.

The naval defence of Washington had been committed to Commodore Barney, a most expert and gallant veteran of the Revolution, who handled his wholly inadequate little force with consummate skill and daring, both afloat and ashore. He was not, strictly speaking, a naval officer, but a privateersman who had made the unique record of taking eleven prizes in ten consecutive days with his famous Baltimore schooner Rossie. The military defence was committed to General Winder, one of the two generals captured by Harvey's '704 firelocks' at Stoney Creek the year before. Winder was a good soldier and did his best in the seven weeks at his disposal. But the American government, which had now enjoyed continuous party power for no less than thirteen years, gave him no more than four hundred regulars, backed by Barney's four hundred excellent seamen and the usual array of militia, with whom to defend the capital in the third campaign of a war they had themselves declared. There were 93,500 militiamen within the threatened area. But only fifteen thousand were got under arms; and only five thousand were brought into action.

The naval defense of Washington was assigned to Commodore Barney, an experienced and brave veteran of the Revolution, who skillfully managed his inadequate small force with great talent and courage, both at sea and on land. Technically, he wasn't a naval officer but a privateer who impressively captured eleven ships in ten straight days with his famous Baltimore schooner Rossie. The military defense was led by General Winder, one of the two generals who had been captured by Harvey's '704 firelocks' at Stoney Creek the previous year. Winder was a capable soldier and did his best during the seven weeks he had. However, the American government, which had been in power for thirteen continuous years, only provided him with four hundred regular troops, supported by Barney's four hundred excellent sailors and the usual militia, to protect the capital during the third campaign of a war they had declared themselves. There were 93,500 militiamen in the threatened area, but only fifteen thousand were mobilized, and just five thousand were actually brought into action.

In the middle of August the British fleet under Admirals Cochrane and Cockburn sailed into Chesapeake Bay with a detachment of four thousand troops commanded by General Ross. Barney had no choice but to retire before this overwhelming force. As the British advanced up the narrowing waters all chance of escape disappeared; so Barney burnt his boats and little vessels and marched his seamen in to join Winder's army. On August 24 Winder's whole six thousand drew up in an exceedingly strong position at Bladensburg, just north of Washington; and the President rode out with his Cabinet to see a battle which is best described by its derisive title of the Bladensburg Races. Ross's four thousand came on and were received by an accurate checking fire from the regular artillery and from Barney's seamen gunners. But a total loss of 8 killed and 11 wounded was more than the 5,000 American militia could stand. All the rest ran for dear life. The deserted handful of regular soldiers and sailors was then overpowered; while Barney was severely wounded and taken prisoner. He and they, however, had saved their honour and won the respect and admiration of both friend and foe. Ross and Cockburn at once congratulated him on the stand he had made against them; and he, with equal magnanimity, reported officially that the British had treated him 'just like a brother.'

In mid-August, the British fleet, led by Admirals Cochrane and Cockburn, sailed into Chesapeake Bay with a detachment of four thousand troops under General Ross. Barney had no choice but to retreat in the face of this overwhelming force. As the British advanced up the narrowing waters, all hope of escape vanished; so Barney burned his boats and small vessels and marched his sailors to join Winder's army. On August 24, Winder's entire force of six thousand took up an extremely strong position at Bladensburg, just north of Washington; and the President rode out with his Cabinet to witness a battle that is best known by its mocking name, the Bladensburg Races. Ross's four thousand advanced and were met with precise fire from the regular artillery and from Barney's sailors. But a total of 8 killed and 11 wounded was more than the 5,000 American militia could handle. The rest fled for their lives. The small number of regular soldiers and sailors that remained were then overwhelmed; while Barney was severely injured and taken prisoner. However, he and his men had preserved their honor and earned the respect and admiration of both friends and enemies. Ross and Cockburn immediately congratulated him for the stand he had taken against them; and he, with equal generosity, officially reported that the British had treated him ‘just like a brother.’

That night the little British army of four thousand men burnt governmental Washington, the capital of a country with eight millions of people. Not a man, not a woman, not a child, was in any way molested; nor was one finger laid on any private property. The four thousand then marched back to the fleet, through an area inhabited by 93,500 militiamen on paper, without having so much as a single musket fired at them.

That night, the small British army of four thousand burned down governmental Washington, the capital of a country with eight million people. Not one man, woman, or child was harmed in any way, nor was a single piece of private property touched. The four thousand then marched back to the fleet, passing through an area that supposedly had 93,500 militiamen, without a single shot being fired at them.

Now, if ever, was Prevost's golden opportunity to end the war with a victory that would turn the scale decisively in favour of the British cause. With the one exception of Lake Erie, the British had the upper hand over the whole five thousand miles of front. A successful British counter-invasion, across the Montreal frontier, would offset the American hold on Lake Erie, ensure the control of Lake Champlain, and thus bring all the scattered parts of the campaign into their proper relation to a central, crowning triumph.

Now, if there was ever a moment, it was Prevost's perfect chance to end the war with a victory that would swing things decisively in favor of the British cause. With the one exception of Lake Erie, the British had the advantage across the entire five thousand miles of front. A successful British counter-invasion across the Montreal border would counterbalance the American control of Lake Erie, secure Lake Champlain, and bring all the separate elements of the campaign into alignment for a major, ultimate victory.

On the other hand, defeat would mean disaster. But the bare possibility of defeat seemed quite absurd when Prevost set out from his field headquarters opposite Montreal, between La Prairie and Chambly, with eleven thousand seasoned veterans, mostly 'Peninsulars,' to attack Plattsburg, which was no more than twenty-five miles across the frontier, very weakly fortified, and garrisoned only by the fifteen hundred regulars whom Izard had 'culled out' when he started for Niagara.

On the other hand, losing would mean disaster. But the mere thought of losing seemed ridiculous when Prevost left his field headquarters near Montreal, between La Prairie and Chambly, with eleven thousand experienced soldiers, mostly 'Peninsulars,' to attack Plattsburg, which was only twenty-five miles across the border, poorly fortified, and defended only by the fifteen hundred regulars that Izard had 'picked out' when he headed for Niagara.

The naval odds were not so favourable. But, as they could be decisively affected by military action, they naturally depended on Prevost, who, with his overwhelming army, could turn them whichever way he chose. It was true that Commodore Macdonough's American flotilla had more trained seamen than Captain Downie's corresponding British force, and that his crews and vessels possessed the further advantage of having worked together for some time. Downie, a brave and skilful young officer, had arrived to take command of his flotilla at the upper end of Lake Champlain only on September 2, that is, exactly a week before Prevost urged him to attack, and nine days before the battle actually did take place. He had a fair proportion of trained seamen; but they consisted of scratch drafts from different men-of-war, chosen in haste and hurried to the front. Most of the men and officers were complete strangers to one another; and they made such short-handed crews that some soldiers had to be wheeled out of the line of march and put on board at the very last minute. There would have been grave difficulties with such a flotilla under any circumstances. But Prevost had increased them tenfold by giving no orders and making no preparations while trying his hand at another abortive armistice—one, moreover, which he had no authority even to propose.

The odds at sea weren't very good. However, since they could be significantly influenced by military actions, they basically relied on Prevost, who, with his superior army, could sway them any way he wanted. It was true that Commodore Macdonough's American fleet had more trained sailors than Captain Downie's British crew, and that his teams and ships had the advantage of having worked together for a while. Downie, a brave and skilled young officer, had taken command of his fleet at the north end of Lake Champlain only on September 2, exactly a week before Prevost pushed him to attack, and nine days before the battle actually occurred. He had a decent number of trained sailors, but they were hastily gathered from different warships and rushed to the front. Most of the men and officers didn’t know each other, which resulted in such short-handed crews that some soldiers had to be quickly taken off the march and put on board at the last moment. There would have been serious challenges for any fleet in this situation. But Prevost made things ten times worse by giving no orders and making no preparations while trying for another unsuccessful ceasefire—one that he didn’t even have the authority to suggest.

Yet, in spite of all this, Prevost still had the means of making Downie superior to Macdonough. Macdonough's vessels were mostly armed with carronades, Downie's with long guns. Carronades fired masses of small projectiles with great effect at very short ranges. Long guns, on the other hand, fired each a single large projectile up to the farthest ranges known. In fact, it was almost as if the Americans had been armed with shot-guns and the British armed with rifles. Therefore the Americans had an overwhelming advantage at close quarters, while the British had a corresponding advantage at long range. Now, Macdonough had anchored in an ideal position for close action inside Plattsburg Bay. He required only a few men to look after his ground tackle; [Footnote: Anchors and cables.] and his springs [Footnote: Ropes to hold a vessel in position when hauling or swinging in a harbour. Here, ropes from the stern to the anchors on the landward side.] were out on the landward side for 'winding ship,' that is, for turning his vessels completely round, so as to bring their fresh broadsides into action. There was no sea-room for manoeuvring round him with any chance of success; so the British would be at a great disadvantage while standing in to the attack, first because they could be raked end-on, next because they could only reply with bow fire—the weakest of all—and, lastly, because their best men would be engaged with the sails and anchors while their ships were taking station.

Yet, despite all this, Prevost still had the ability to make Downie stronger than Macdonough. Macdonough's ships were mostly equipped with carronades, while Downie's were armed with long guns. Carronades could fire a bunch of small projectiles very effectively at close range. Long guns, on the other hand, shot one large projectile designed for long distances. It was almost as if the Americans were using shotguns and the British were using rifles. This meant the Americans had a huge advantage in close combat, while the British excelled at long range. Macdonough had positioned himself perfectly for close action inside Plattsburg Bay. He only needed a few men to manage his anchors; [Footnote: Anchors and cables.] and his springs [Footnote: Ropes to hold a vessel in position when hauling or swinging in a harbor. Here, ropes from the stern to the anchors on the landward side.] were out on the landward side for 'winding ship,' which is turning his vessels around to bring their fresh broadsides into play. There wasn't enough space to maneuver around him successfully, so the British would be at a significant disadvantage while trying to attack. They could be targeted head-on, had only bow fire— the weakest type of attack— and their best men would be busy with the sails and anchors while their ships were taking position.

But Prevost had it fully in his power to prevent Macdonough from fighting in such an ideal position at all. Macdonough's American flotilla was well within range of Macomb's long-range American land batteries; while Prevost's overwhelming British army was easily able to take these land batteries, turn their guns on Macdonough's helpless vessels—whose short-range carronades could not possibly reply—and so either destroy the American flotilla at anchor in the bay or force it out into the open lake, where it would meet Downie's long-range guns at the greatest disadvantage. Prevost, after allowing for all other duties, had at least seven thousand veterans for an assault on Macomb's second-rate regulars and ordinary militia, both of whom together amounted at most to thirty-five hundred, including local militiamen who had come in to reinforce the 'culls' whom Izard had left behind. The Americans, though working with very creditable zeal, determined to do their best, quite expected to be beaten out of their little forts and entrenchments, which were just across the fordable Saranac in front of Prevost's army. They had tried to delay the British advance. But, in the words of Macomb's own official report, 'so undaunted was the enemy that he never deployed in his whole march, always pressing on in column'; that is, the British veterans simply brushed the Americans aside without deigning to change from their column of march into a line of battle. Prevost's duty was therefore perfectly plain. With all the odds in his favour ashore, and with the power of changing the odds in his favour afloat, he ought to have captured Macomb's position in the early morning and turned both his own and Macomb's artillery on Macdonough, who would then have been forced to leave his moorings for the open lake, where Downie would have had eight hours of daylight to fight him at long range.

But Prevost had complete control to prevent Macdonough from fighting in such an ideal position. Macdonough's American fleet was well within the range of Macomb's long-range American land batteries, while Prevost's overwhelming British army could easily take these land batteries, turn their guns on Macdonough's defenseless ships—whose short-range carronades couldn't possibly respond—and either destroy the American fleet anchored in the bay or force it out into the open lake, where it would face Downie's long-range guns at a severe disadvantage. After accounting for all other duties, Prevost had at least seven thousand seasoned soldiers for an attack on Macomb's second-rate regulars and ordinary militia, who together numbered at most thirty-five hundred, including local militiamen who had come in to support the 'culls' left behind by Izard. The Americans, while working with admirable enthusiasm and determined to give their best effort, fully expected to be driven out of their small forts and entrenchments, which were just across the fordable Saranac in front of Prevost's army. They had tried to slow the British advance. But, in Macomb's own official report, he noted, 'so undaunted was the enemy that he never deployed in his whole march, always pressing on in column'; meaning the British veterans simply pushed the Americans aside without bothering to switch from their column formation into a battle line. Prevost's course of action was therefore very clear. With all the advantages on land and the ability to change the odds at sea, he should have captured Macomb's position early in the morning and directed both his artillery and Macomb's against Macdonough, who would then have been forced to leave his moorings for the open lake, where Downie would have had eight hours of daylight to engage him at long range.

What Prevost actually did was something disgracefully different. Having first wasted time by his attempted armistice, and so hindered preparations at the base, between La Prairie and Chambly, he next proceeded to cross the frontier too soon. He reported home that Downie could not be ready before September 15. But on August 31 he crossed the line himself, only twenty-five miles from his objective, thus prematurely showing the enemy his hand. Then he began to goad the unhappy Downie to his doom. Downie's flagship, the Confiance, named after a French prize which Yeo had taken, was launched only on August 25, and hauled out into the stream only on September 7. Her scratch crew could not go to battle quarters till the 8th; and the shipwrights were working madly at her up to the very moment that the first shot was fired in her fatal action on the 11th. Yet Prevost tried to force her into action on the 9th, adding, 'I need not dwell with you on the evils resulting to both services from delay,' and warning Downie that he was being watched: 'Captain Watson is directed to remain at Little Chazy until you are preparing to get under way.'

What Prevost actually did was something shamefully different. After wasting time with his attempt at a truce, which slowed down preparations at the base between La Prairie and Chambly, he then crossed the border too early. He reported back that Downie wouldn’t be ready before September 15. But on August 31, he crossed the border himself, only twenty-five miles from his target, prematurely revealing his plan to the enemy. Then he started pushing the unfortunate Downie toward disaster. Downie's flagship, the Confiance, named after a French prize that Yeo had captured, was launched only on August 25 and moved into the stream only on September 7. Her makeshift crew couldn't get to battle stations until the 8th, and the shipwrights were frantically working on her right up until the first shot was fired in her doomed battle on the 11th. Yet Prevost tried to force her into action on the 9th, adding, 'I need not dwell with you on the evils resulting to both services from delay,' and warning Downie that he was being watched: 'Captain Watson is directed to remain at Little Chazy until you are preparing to get under way.'

Thus watched and goaded by the governor-general and commander-in-chief, whose own service was the Army, Downie, a comparative junior in the Navy, put forth his utmost efforts, against his better judgment, to sail that very midnight. A baffling head-wind, however, kept him from working out. He immediately reported to Prevost, giving quite satisfactory reasons. But Prevost wrote back impatiently: 'The troops have been held in readiness, since six o'clock this morning [the 10th], to storm the enemy's works at nearly the same time as the naval action begins in the bay. I ascribe the disappointment I have experienced to the unfortunate change of wind, and shall rejoice to learn that my reasonable expectations have been frustrated by no other cause.' 'No other cause.' The innuendo, even if unintentional, was there. Downie, a junior sailor, was perhaps suspected of 'shyness' by a very senior soldier. Prevost's poison worked quickly. 'I will convince him that the Navy won't be backward,' said Downie to his second, Pring, who gave this evidence, under oath, at the subsequent court-martial. Pring, whose evidence was corroborated by that of both the first lieutenant and the master of the Confiance, then urged the extreme risk of engaging Macdonough inside the bay. But Downie allayed their anxiety by telling them that Prevost had promised to storm Macomb's indefensible works simultaneously. This was not nearly so good as if Prevost had promised to defeat Macomb first and then drive Macdonough out to sea. But it was better, far better, than what actually was done.

Thus watched and pressured by the governor-general and commander-in-chief, whose main background was in the Army, Downie, a relatively junior officer in the Navy, pushed himself to the limit, against his better judgment, to set sail that very midnight. However, a frustrating headwind prevented him from making any progress. He immediately informed Prevost, providing satisfactory reasons for the delay. But Prevost impatiently replied, “The troops have been ready since six o'clock this morning [the 10th], to launch an attack on the enemy's fortifications at nearly the same time as the naval action starts in the bay. I attribute the disappointment I feel to the unfortunate change in the wind and will be glad to know that my reasonable expectations have not been thwarted by any other reason.” “No other cause.” The implication, whether intended or not, was clear. Downie, a junior sailor, was perhaps seen as ‘hesitant’ by a much more senior soldier. Prevost's insinuations took effect quickly. “I’ll show him that the Navy won’t hold back,” Downie told his second-in-command, Pring, who later testified to this at the court-martial. Pring, whose testimony was supported by both the first lieutenant and the master of the Confiance, then expressed serious concerns about the risk of engaging Macdonough inside the bay. But Downie calmed their fears by stating that Prevost had promised to attack Macomb's indefensible fortifications at the same time. This was not nearly as favorable as if Prevost had committed to defeating Macomb first and then driving Macdonough out to sea. But it was certainly much better than what actually transpired.

With Prevost's written promise in his pocket Downie sailed for Plattsburg in the early morning of that fatal 11th of September. Punctually to the minute he fired his preconcerted signal outside Cumberland Head, which separated the bay from the lake. He next waited exactly the prescribed time, during which he reconnoitred Macdonough's position from a boat. Then the hour of battle came. The hammering of the shipwrights stopped at last; and the ill-starred Confiance, that ship which never had a chance to 'find herself,' led the little squadron into Prevost's death-trap in the bay. Every soldier and sailor now realized that the storming of the works on land ought to have been the first move, and that Prevost's idea of simultaneous action was faulty, because it meant two independent fights, with the chance of a naval disaster preceding the military success. However, Prevost was the commander-in-chief; he had promised co-operation in his own way; and Downie was determined to show him that the Navy had stopped for 'no other cause' than the head-wind of the day before.

With Prevost's written promise in hand, Downie set sail for Plattsburg early on that fateful September 11th. Right on the minute, he fired his planned signal outside Cumberland Head, which separated the bay from the lake. He then waited the exact amount of time required, during which he surveyed Macdonough's position from a boat. Then the battle hour arrived. The sound of the shipwrights finally stopped; and the unfortunate Confiance, the ship that never had a chance to find its purpose, led the small squadron into Prevost's death trap in the bay. Every soldier and sailor now understood that storming the land defenses should have been the first move and that Prevost's idea of simultaneous action was flawed because it involved two separate fights, with the risk of a naval disaster happening before any military success. However, Prevost was the commander-in-chief; he had promised to coordinate in his own way; and Downie was determined to prove to him that the Navy had halted for 'no other cause' except for the headwind the day before.

Did no other cause than mistaken judgment affect Prevost that fatal morning? Did he intend to show Downie that a commander-in-chief could not suffer the 'disappointment' of 'holding troops in readiness' without marking his displeasure by some visible return in kind? Or was he no worse than criminally weak? His motives will never be known. But his actions throw a sinister light upon them. For when Downie sailed in to the attack Prevost did nothing whatever to help him. Betrayed, traduced, and goaded to his ruin, Downie fought a losing battle with the utmost gallantry and skill. The wind flawed and failed inside the bay, so that the Confiance could not reach her proper station. Yet her first broadside struck down forty men aboard the Saratoga. Then the Saratoga fired her carronades, at point-blank range, cut up the cables aboard the Confiance, and did great execution among the crew. In fifteen minutes Downie fell.

Did anything other than bad judgment influence Prevost that fateful morning? Did he want to show Downie that a commander-in-chief couldn't deal with the 'disappointment' of 'keeping troops on standby' without expressing his displeasure in some obvious way? Or was he simply weak? We'll never know his true motives. But his actions cast a dark shadow on them. When Downie launched his attack, Prevost did nothing to assist him. Betrayed, slandered, and pushed toward his demise, Downie fought a losing battle with incredible bravery and skill. The wind faltered and died in the bay, preventing the Confiance from reaching her designated position. Still, her first broadside took down forty men on the Saratoga. Then the Saratoga fired her carronades at close range, severed the cables of the Confiance, and caused significant damage to the crew. In fifteen minutes, Downie was killed.

The battle raged two full hours longer; while the odds against the British continued to increase. Four of their little gunboats fought as well as gunboats could. But the other seven simply ran away, like their commander afterwards when summoned for a court-martial that would assuredly have sentenced him to death. Two of the larger vessels failed to come into action properly; one went ashore, the other drifted through the American line and then hauled down her colours. Thus the battle was fought to its dire conclusion by the British Confiance and Linnet against the American Saratoga, Eagle, and Ticonderoga. The gunboats had little to do with the result; though the odds of all those actually engaged were greatly in favour of Macdonough. The fourth American vessel of larger size drifted out of action.

The battle lasted two full hours longer, and the odds against the British kept getting worse. Four of their small gunboats fought as best as they could. But the other seven simply ran away, just like their commander did later when he was called for a court-martial that would definitely have sentenced him to death. Two of the larger ships didn’t engage properly; one ran aground, and the other drifted through the American line and then lowered its flag. So, the battle came to a grim end with the British Confiance and Linnet against the American Saratoga, Eagle, and Ticonderoga. The gunboats had little impact on the outcome; however, the odds for those actually participating favored Macdonough significantly. The fourth larger American vessel drifted out of action.

Macdonough, an officer of whom any navy in the world might well be proud, then concentrated on the stricken Confiance with his own Saratoga, greatly aided by the Eagle, which swung round so as to rake the Confiance with her fresh broadside. The Linnet now drifted off a little and so could not help the Confiance, both because the American galleys at once engaged her and because her position was bad in any case. Presently both flagships slackened fire; whereupon Macdonough took the opportunity of winding ship. His ground tackle was in perfect order on the far, or landward, side; so the Saratoga swung round quite easily. The Confiance now had both the Eagle's and the Saratoga's fresh carronade broadsides deluging her battered, cannon-armed broadside with showers of deadly grape. Her one last chance of keeping up a little longer was to wind ship herself. Her tackle had all been cut; but her master got out his last spare cables and tried to bring her round, while some of his toiling men fell dead at every haul. She began to wind round very slowly; and, when exactly at right angles to Macdonough, was raked completely, fore and aft. At the same time an ominous list to port, where her side was torn in over a hundred places, showed that she would sink quickly if her guns could not be run across to starboard. But more than half her mixed scratch crew had been already killed or wounded. The most desperate efforts of her few surviving officers could not prevent the confusion that followed the fearful raking she now received from both her superior opponents; and before her fresh broadside could be brought to bear she was forced to strike her flag. Then every American carronade and gun was turned upon Pring's undaunted little Linnet, which kept up the hopeless fight for fifteen minutes longer; so that Prevost might yet have a chance to carry out his own operations without fear of molestation from a hostile bay.

Macdonough, an officer any navy in the world would be proud to have, focused on the damaged Confiance with his own Saratoga, significantly supported by the Eagle, which moved to rake the Confiance with her fresh broadside. The Linnet drifted off a bit and couldn’t assist the Confiance, as the American galleys quickly engaged her and her position was poor anyway. Soon, both flagships reduced their fire; this gave Macdonough the chance to maneuver his ship. His anchor system was perfectly set on the land side, so the Saratoga turned around easily. The Confiance was now being bombarded by the fresh carronade broadsides from both the Eagle and the Saratoga, showering her damaged cannon-armed side with deadly grape. Her last hope to stay afloat a little longer was to maneuver her ship as well. Since all her tackles had been severed, her captain managed to use his last spare cables and attempted to turn her around, while some of his struggling crew fell dead with each pull. She began to turn slowly, and when she was perpendicular to Macdonough, she was completely raked, both front and back. At the same time, a concerning list to port, where her side was torn in over a hundred places, indicated she would sink quickly if her guns couldn't be moved to starboard. But more than half her mixed crew had already been killed or injured. The most desperate efforts from her few surviving officers couldn’t stop the chaos that followed the devastating barrage she received from her stronger enemies; and before she could fire back with her fresh broadside, she was forced to surrender. Then every American carronade and gun was aimed at Pring's fearless little Linnet, which continued to fight hopelessly for another fifteen minutes, so Prevost might still have a chance to carry out his operations without fear of interference from an enemy bay.

But Prevost was in no danger of molestation. He was in perfect safety. He watched the destruction of his fleet from his secure headquarters, well inland, marched and countermarched his men about, to make a show of action; and then, as the Linnet fired her last, despairing gun, he told all ranks to go to dinner.

But Prevost was in no danger of being bothered. He was completely safe. He watched his fleet get destroyed from his secure headquarters, well inland, and moved his troops around to create an impression of activity; then, as the Linnet fired her last desperate shot, he instructed everyone to go to dinner.

That night he broke camp hurriedly, left all his badly wounded men behind him, and went back a great deal faster than he came. His shamed, disgusted veterans deserted in unprecedented numbers. And Macomb's astounded army found themselves the victors of an unfought field.

That night, he quickly packed up camp, leaving all his seriously injured men behind, and returned much faster than he arrived. His shameful, disgusted veterans deserted in record numbers. And Macomb's shocked army found themselves the winners of a battle that never happened.

The American victory at Plattsburg gave the United States the absolute control of Lake Champlain; and this, reinforcing their similar control of Lake Erie, counterbalanced the British military advantages all along the Canadian frontier. The British command of the sea, the destruction of Washington, and the occupation of Maine told heavily on the other side. These three British advantages had been won while the mother country was fighting with her right hand tied behind her back; and in all the elements of warlike strength the British Empire was vastly superior to the United States. Thus there cannot be the slightest doubt that if the British had been free to continue the war they must have triumphed. But they were not free. Europe was seething with the profound unrest that made her statesmen feel the volcano heaving under their every step during the portentous year between Napoleon's abdication and return. The mighty British Navy, the veteran British Army, could not now be sent across the sea in overwhelming force. So American diplomacy eagerly seized this chance of profiting by British needs, and took such good advantage of them that the Treaty of Ghent, which ended the war on Christmas Eve, left the two opponents in much the same position towards each other as before. Neither of the main reasons for which the Americans had fought their three campaigns was even mentioned in the articles.

The American victory at Plattsburgh gave the United States complete control of Lake Champlain, which, along with their similar control of Lake Erie, balanced out the British military advantages along the Canadian frontier. The British dominance at sea, the burning of Washington, and the occupation of Maine weighed heavily on the other side. These three British advantages were achieved while the mother country was fighting with one hand tied behind its back; overall, in terms of military strength, the British Empire was far superior to the United States. Therefore, there's no doubt that if the British had been free to continue the war, they would have won. But they were not free. Europe was in a state of profound unrest, making its leaders feel the ground shifting beneath them during the significant year between Napoleon's abdication and return. The powerful British Navy and seasoned British Army could no longer be sent across the ocean in overwhelming numbers. So American diplomacy eagerly took advantage of this situation, making the most of British needs, leading to the Treaty of Ghent, which ended the war on Christmas Eve, leaving both sides in much the same position as before. Neither of the main reasons the Americans fought their three campaigns was even mentioned in the treaty articles.

The war had been an unmitigated curse to the motherland herself; and it brought the usual curses in its train all over the scene of action. But some positive good came out of it as well, both in Canada and in the United States.

The war had been a complete disaster for the motherland; and it brought the usual troubles everywhere it unfolded. But some positive outcomes emerged from it as well, both in Canada and in the United States.

The benefits conferred on the United States could not be given in apter words than those used by Gallatin, who, as the finance minister during four presidential terms, saw quite enough of the seamy side to sober his opinions, and who, as a prominent member of the war party, shared the disappointed hopes of his colleagues about the conquest of Canada. His opinion is, of course, that of a partisan. But it contains much truth, for all that:

The advantages granted to the United States couldn't be expressed better than by Gallatin, who, as the finance minister for four presidential terms, had seen enough of the darker aspects of governance to temper his views. As a key member of the war party, he also shared the disappointed expectations of his peers regarding the takeover of Canada. His perspective, while clearly biased, holds a lot of truth nonetheless:

   The war has been productive of evil and of good; but
   I think the good preponderates. It has laid the
   foundations of permanent taxes and military
   establishments, which the Republicans [as the
   anti-Federalist Democrats were then called] had deemed
   unfavorable to the happiness and free institutions of
   the country. Under our former system we were becoming
   too selfish, too much attached exclusively to the
   acquisition of wealth, above all, too much confined
   in our political feelings to local and state objects.
   The war has renewed the national feelings and character
   which the Revolution had given, and which were daily
   lessening. The people are now more American. They feel
   and act more as a nation. And I hope that the permanency
   of the Union is thereby better secured.
   The war has brought both good and bad, but I believe the good outweighs the bad. It has established lasting taxes and military forces, which the Republicans (the anti-Federalist Democrats of the time) thought would be harmful to the country's happiness and freedom. Under our previous system, we were becoming too selfish, overly focused on just making money, and too limited in our political views, mostly thinking about local and state issues. The war has revitalized the national spirit and identity that the Revolution had created, which was fading away. The people now see themselves as more American. They think and act more like a united nation. I hope this strengthens the durability of the Union.

Gallatin did not, of course, foresee that it would take a third conflict to finish what the Revolution had begun. But this sequel only strengthens his argument. For that Union which was born in the throes of the Revolution had to pass through its tumultuous youth in '1812' before reaching full manhood by means of the Civil War.

Gallatin didn't see that it would take a third conflict to complete what the Revolution started. But this follow-up only reinforces his point. The Union that emerged from the struggles of the Revolution had to endure its chaotic early years in '1812' before achieving full maturity through the Civil War.

The benefits conferred on Canada were equally permanent and even greater. How Gallatin would have rejoiced to see in the United States any approach to such a financial triumph as that which was won by the Army Bills in Canada! No public measure was ever more successful at the time or more full of promise for the future. But mightier problems than even those of national finance were brought nearer to their desirable solution by this propitious war. It made Ontario what Quebec had long since been—historic ground; thus bringing the older and newer provinces together with one exalting touch. It was also the last, as well as the most convincing, defeat of the three American invasions of Canada. The first had been led by Sir William Phips in 1690. This was long before the Revolution. The American Colonies were then still British and Canada still French. But the invasion itself was distinctively American, in men, ships, money, and design. It was undertaken without the consent or knowledge of the home authorities; and its success would probably have destroyed all chance of there being any British Canada to-day. The second American invasion had been that of Montgomery and Arnold in 1775, during the Revolution, when the very diverse elements of a new Canadian life first began to defend their common heritage against a common foe. The third invasion—the War of 1812—united all these elements once more, just when Canada stood most in need of mutual confidence between them. So there could not have been a better bond of union than the blood then shed so willingly by her different races in a single righteous cause.

The lasting benefits for Canada were substantial and even more significant. How Gallatin would have celebrated seeing the United States achieve a financial success comparable to the Army Bills in Canada! No public initiative was ever more successful at that time or held as much promise for the future. But even bigger issues than national finance were closer to a favorable resolution because of this fortunate war. It turned Ontario into what Quebec had already become—historic ground; thus connecting the older and newer provinces in an uplifting way. This was also the last and most decisive defeat of the three American invasions of Canada. The first was led by Sir William Phips in 1690, long before the Revolution, when the American Colonies were still British and Canada was still French. However, the invasion itself was distinctly American, in terms of manpower, ships, funds, and objectives. It was carried out without the approval or knowledge of the home authorities, and its success would likely have eliminated any chance of British Canada existing today. The second American invasion was that of Montgomery and Arnold in 1775, during the Revolution, when the diverse elements of a new Canadian identity began to defend their shared heritage against a common enemy. The third invasion—the War of 1812—brought all these elements together again, just when Canada needed mutual trust among them the most. There could not have been a better unifying factor than the blood willingly shed by her different races for a single just cause.










BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

Enough books to fill a small library have been written about the 'sprawling and sporadic' War of 1812. Most of them deal with particular phases, localities, or events; and most of them are distinctly partisan. This is unfortunate, but not surprising. The war was waged over an immense area, by various forces, and with remarkably various results. The Americans were victorious on the Lakes and in all but one of the naval duels fought at sea. Yet their coast was completely sealed up by the Great Blockade in the last campaign. The balance of victory inclined towards the British side on land. Yet the annihilating American victories on the Lakes nullified most of the general military advantages gained by the British along the Canadian frontier. The fortunes of each campaign were followed with great interest on both sides of the line. But on the other side of the Atlantic the British home public had Napoleon to think of at their very doors; and so, for the most part, they regarded the war with the States as an untoward and regrettable annoyance, which diverted too much force and attention from the life-and-death affairs of Europe.

Enough books to fill a small library have been written about the 'sprawling and sporadic' War of 1812. Most of them focus on specific phases, locations, or events, and most have a clear bias. This is unfortunate but not surprising. The war was fought over a vast area, with various forces, and it produced remarkably different outcomes. The Americans won on the Lakes and in almost all naval battles at sea. However, their coastline was completely blockaded by the Great Blockade in the last campaign. The balance of victory leaned towards the British on land. Yet the decisive American victories on the Lakes negated most of the general military advantages gained by the British along the Canadian border. The outcomes of each campaign were closely followed on both sides of the line. But back across the Atlantic, the British public was preoccupied with Napoleon at their doorstep; consequently, they mostly saw the war with the States as an unfortunate distraction that diverted too much force and attention from the critical matters in Europe.

All these peculiar influences are reflected in the different patriotic annals. Americans are voluble about the Lakes and the naval duels out at sea. But the completely effective British blockade of their coast-line is a too depressingly scientific factor in the problem to be welcomed by a general public which would not understand how Yankee ships could win so many duels while the British Navy won the war. Canadians are equally voluble about the battles on Canadian soil, where Americans had decidedly the worst of it. As a rule, Canadian writers have been quite as controversial as Americans, and not any readier to study their special subjects as parts of a greater whole. The British Isles have never had an interested public anxious to read about this remote, distasteful, and subsidiary war; and books about it there have consequently been very few.

All these strange influences show up in the various patriotic stories. Americans are really talkative about the Lakes and the naval battles out at sea. But the completely effective British blockade of their coastline is a pretty depressing and technical factor in the situation that doesn't resonate with the general public, which wouldn’t understand how American ships could win so many battles while the British Navy won the war. Canadians are equally chatty about the fights on Canadian soil, where Americans definitely came off worse. Generally, Canadian writers have been just as controversial as Americans and not any more eager to view their specific topics as part of a bigger picture. The British Isles have never had an interested audience keen to read about this distant, unpleasant, and lesser war; hence, there have been very few books about it there.

The two chief authors who have appealed directly to the readers of the mother country are William James and Sir Charles Lucas. James was an industrious naval historian; but he was quite as anti-American as the earlier American writers were anti-British. Owing to this perverting bias his two books, the Naval and the Military Occurrences of the late War between Great Britain and the United States, are not to be relied upon. Their appendices, however, give a great many documents which are of much assistance in studying the real history of the war. James wrote only a few years after the peace. Nearly a century later Sir Charles Lucas wrote The Canadian War of 1812, which is the work of a man whose life-long service in the Colonial Office and intimate acquaintance with Canadian history have both been turned to the best account. The two chief Canadian authors are Colonel Cruikshank and James Hannay. Colonel Cruikshank deserves the greatest credit for being a real pioneer with his Documentary History of the Campaigns upon the Niagara Frontier. Hannay's History of the War of 1812 shows careful study of the Canadian aspects of the operations; but its generally sound arguments are weakened by its controversial tone.

The two main authors who have directly addressed readers in the mother country are William James and Sir Charles Lucas. James was a dedicated naval historian, but he was as anti-American as earlier American writers were anti-British. Because of this bias, his two books, the Naval and the Military Occurrences of the late War between Great Britain and the United States, aren't very reliable. However, their appendices contain many documents that are quite helpful for studying the true history of the war. James wrote just a few years after the peace. Nearly a century later, Sir Charles Lucas wrote The Canadian War of 1812, a work that reflects his lifelong service in the Colonial Office and deep understanding of Canadian history. The two main Canadian authors are Colonel Cruikshank and James Hannay. Colonel Cruikshank deserves significant recognition for being a pioneer with his Documentary History of the Campaigns upon the Niagara Frontier. Hannay's History of the War of 1812 demonstrates careful study of the Canadian aspects of the operations, but its overall solid arguments are undermined by its controversial tone.

The four chief American authors to reckon with are, Lossing, Upton, Roosevelt, and Mahan. They complement rather than correspond with the four British authors. The best known American work dealing with the military campaigns is Lossing's Field-Book of the War of 1812. It is an industrious compilation; but quite uncritical and most misleading. General Upton's Military Policy of the United States incidentally pricks all the absurd American militia bubbles with an incontrovertible array of hard and pointed facts. The Naval War of 1812, by Theodore Roosevelt, is an excellent sketch which shows a genuine wish to be fair to both sides. But the best naval work, and the most thorough work of any kind on either side, is Admiral Mahan's Sea Power in its Relations to the War of 1812.

The four main American authors to consider are Lossing, Upton, Roosevelt, and Mahan. They complement rather than correspond with the four British authors. The best-known American work on military campaigns is Lossing's Field-Book of the War of 1812. It's a detailed compilation, but it's quite uncritical and misleading. General Upton's Military Policy of the United States effectively challenges all the ridiculous American militia myths with an undeniable collection of hard facts. The Naval War of 1812 by Theodore Roosevelt is an excellent overview that shows a genuine attempt to be fair to both sides. However, the best naval work, and the most comprehensive work of any kind on either side, is Admiral Mahan's Sea Power in its Relations to the War of 1812.

A good deal of original evidence on the American side is given in Brannan's Official Letters of the Military and Naval Officers of the United States during the War with Great Britain in the Years 1812 to 1815. The original British evidence about the campaigns in Canada is given in William Wood's Select British Documents of the Canadian War of 1812. Students who wish to see the actual documents must go to Washington, London, and Ottawa. The Dominion Archives are of exceptional interest to all concerned.

A lot of original evidence from the American side is found in Brannan's Official Letters of the Military and Naval Officers of the United States during the War with Great Britain in the Years 1812 to 1815. The original British evidence regarding the campaigns in Canada is provided in William Wood's Select British Documents of the Canadian War of 1812. Students who want to see the actual documents need to visit Washington, London, and Ottawa. The Dominion Archives are particularly interesting for everyone involved.

The present work is based entirely on original evidence, both American and British.

The current work is completely based on original evidence from both American and British sources.

END








Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!