This is a modern-English version of The uses of astronomy : An oration delivered at Albany on the 28th of July, 1856, originally written by Everett, Edward.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
THE USES OF ASTRONOMY.
AN ORATION
Delivered at Albany, on the 28th of August, 1856
BY
BY
EDWARD EVERETT,
ON THE
ON THE
OCCASION OF THE INAUGURATION OF THE
DUDLEY ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY,
WITH A
CONDENSED REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS,
AND AN ACCOUNT OF THE
DEDICATION OF NEW YORK STATE GEOLOGICAL HALL.
WITH A
PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY,
AND A DESCRIPTION OF THE
DEDICATION OF NEW YORK STATE GEOLOGICAL HALL.
NEW YORK:
PUBLISHED BY ROSS & TOUSEY,
103 NASSAU STREET.
1856.
NEW YORK:
PUBLISHED BY ROSS & TOUSEY,
103 NASSAU STREET.
1856.
CONTENTS
Page | |
A Note Explanatory | 2 |
Two New Institutions of Science | 3 |
The Dedication of the Geological Hall | 3 |
Inauguration of Dudley Observatory | 9 |
Oration | 13 |
A NOTE EXPLANATORY.
The undersigned ventures to put forth this report of Mr. Everett's Oration, in connection with a condensed account of the Inauguration of the Dudley Observatory, and the Dedication of the New State Geological Hall, at Albany,—in the hope that the demand which has exhausted the newspaper editions, may exhaust this as speedily as possible; not that he is particularly tenacious of a reward for his own slight labors, but because he believes that the extensive circulation of the record of the two events so interesting and important to the cause of Science will exercise a beneficial influence upon the public mind. The effort of the distinguished Statesman who has invested Astronomy with new beauties, is the latest and one of the most brilliant of his compositions, and is already wholly out of print, though scarcely a month has elapsed since the date of its delivery. The account of the proceedings at Albany during the Ceremonies of Inauguration is necessarily brief, but accurate, and is respectfully submitted to the consideration of the reader.
The undersigned is presenting this report of Mr. Everett's Oration, along with a brief overview of the Inauguration of the Dudley Observatory and the Dedication of the New State Geological Hall in Albany. This is done with the hope that the high demand that has depleted the newspaper editions will also deplete this report quickly; not because he particularly seeks recognition for his minor efforts, but because he believes that widespread distribution of the details of these two notable and significant events for the advancement of Science will positively influence the public's awareness. The work of the distinguished Statesman, who has revealed new wonders in Astronomy, is one of his latest and most impressive pieces, and it is already completely out of print, even though less than a month has passed since it was delivered. The report on the events in Albany during the Inauguration Ceremonies is necessarily brief but accurate, and is respectfully presented for the reader's consideration.
A. MAVERICK.
A. Rebel.
New York, October 1, 1856.
New York, October 1, 1856.
TWO NEW INSTITUTIONS OF SCIENCE;
AND
THE SCENES WHICH ATTENDED THEIR CHRISTENING.
AND
THE SCENES THAT TOOK PLACE DURING THEIR CHRISTENING.
In the month of August last, two events took place in the city of Albany, which have more than an ephemeral interest. They occurred in close connection with the proceedings of a Scientific Convention, and the memory of them deserves to be cherished as a recollection of the easy way in which Science may be popularized and be rendered so generally acceptable that the people will cry, like Oliver Twist, for more. It is the purpose of this small publication to embody, in a form more durable than that of the daily newspaper, the record of proceedings which have so near a relation to the progress of scientific research. A marked feature in the ceremonies was the magnificent Oration of the Hon. Edward Everett, inaugurating the Dudley Observatory of Albany; and it is believed that the reissue of that speech in its present form will be acceptable to the admirers of that distinguished gentleman, not less than to the lovers of Science, who hung with delight upon his words.
In August last year, two events happened in Albany that are more than just a passing interest. They were closely tied to the activities of a Scientific Convention, and we should remember them as a reminder of how easily Science can be made popular and become so widely embraced that people will ask for more, just like Oliver Twist. This small publication aims to present, in a more lasting form than that of a daily newspaper, the record of events that are closely related to the advancement of scientific research. A notable highlight of the ceremonies was the impressive speech by Hon. Edward Everett, which officially opened the Dudley Observatory of Albany; it is believed that reissuing that speech in its current form will be appreciated by fans of that distinguished figure, as well as by those who love Science and were captivated by his words.
THE DEDICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL HALL.
THE DEDICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL HALL.
On Wednesday, August 27, 1856, the State Geological Hall of New York was dedicated with appropriate ceremonies. For the purpose of affording accommodation to the immense crowds of people who, it was confidently anticipated, would throng to this demonstration and that of the succeeding day, at which Mr. Everett spoke, a capacious Tent was arranged with care in the center of Academy Park, on Capitol Hill; and under its shelter the ceremonies of the inauguration of both institutions were conducted without accident or confusion; attended on the first day by fully three thousand persons, and on the second by a number which may be safely computed at from five to seven thousand.
On Wednesday, August 27, 1856, the State Geological Hall of New York was officially opened with fitting ceremonies. To accommodate the large crowds that were expected to attend this event and the one the following day, where Mr. Everett spoke, a spacious tent was carefully set up in the center of Academy Park on Capitol Hill. Under its cover, the inauguration ceremonies for both institutions were held smoothly and without any issues; the first day saw around three thousand attendees, while the second day drew between five and seven thousand people.
The announcement that Hon. Wm. H. Seward would be present at the dedication of the Geological Hall, excited great interest among the citizens; but the hope of his appearance proved fallacious. His place was occupied by seven picked men of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, one of whom (Prof. Henry) declared his inability to compute the problem why seven men of science were to be considered equal to one statesman. The result justified the selections of the committee, and although the Senator was not present, [4]the seven Commoners of Science made the occasion a most notable one by the flow of wit, elegance of phrase, solidity and cogency of argument, and rare discernment of natural truths, with which their discourse was garnished.
The announcement that Hon. William H. Seward would attend the dedication of the Geological Hall stirred great interest among the citizens, but the hope of his appearance turned out to be false. His spot was filled by seven distinguished members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, one of whom (Prof. Henry) expressed his inability to understand why seven scientists could be seen as equal to one statesman. However, the outcome validated the committee’s choices, and even though the Senator was absent, [4] the seven Commoners of Science made the occasion memorable with their sharp wit, elegant speeches, solid and persuasive arguments, and keen insights into natural truths, which enriched their discussions.
The members of the American Association marched in procession to the Tent, from their place of meeting in the State Capitol. On the stage were assembled many distinguished gentlemen, and in the audience were hundreds of ladies. Gov. Clark and Ex-Governors Hunt and Seymour, of New York, Sir Wm. Logan, of Canada, Hon. George Bancroft, and others as well known as these, were among the number present. The tent was profusely decorated. Small banners in tri-color were distributed over the entire area covered by the stage, and adorned the wings. The following inscriptions were placed over the front of the rostrum,—that in honor of "The Press" occupying a central position:
The members of the American Association marched in a procession to the tent from their meeting place at the State Capitol. On stage, many prominent individuals were gathered, and the audience included hundreds of women. Governor Clark and former Governors Hunting and Seymour of New York, Sir Wm. Logan from Canada, Hon. George Bancroft, and other well-known figures were among those present. The tent was lavishly decorated. Small tri-color banners were spread throughout the area on stage and adorned the sides. The following inscriptions were displayed at the front of the podium, with the one honoring "The Press" taking a central position:
GEOLOGY. | THE PRESS. | |
METEOROLOGY. | MINERALOGY. | |
METALLURGY. | ETHNOLOGY. | |
ASTRONOMY. | ||
The following were arranged in various positions on the right and left: | ||
CHEMISTRY. | TELEGRAPH. | |
PHYSIOLOGY. | LETTERS. | |
CONCHOLOGY. | HYDROLOGY. | |
PALÆONTOLOGY. | ZOOLOGY. | |
MICROSCOPY. | ICHTHYOLOGY. | |
ART. | MANUFACTURES. | |
STEAM. | AGRICULTURE. | |
COMMERCE. | PHYSICS. | |
SCIENCE. | ANATOMY. | |
NAVIGATION. | BOTANY. |
The proceedings of the day were opened with prayer by Rev. Geo. W. Bethune, D.D., of Brooklyn.
The day's events started with a prayer by Rev. Geo. W. Bethune, D.D., of Brooklyn.
Hon. Garrit Y. Lansing, of Albany, then introduced Professor Louis Agassiz, of Cambridge, Mass., who was the first of the "seven men of science" to entertain his audience, always with the aid of the inevitable black-board, without which the excellent Professor would be as much at a loss as a chemist without a laboratory. Professor Agassiz spoke for an hour, giving his views of a new theory of animal development. He began by saying:—
Hon. Garrit Y. Lansing, from Albany, then introduced Professor Louis Agassiz, from Cambridge, Mass., who was the first of the "seven men of science" to engage his audience, always with the necessary blackboard, without which the great Professor would be as lost as a chemist without a lab. Professor Agassiz spoke for an hour, sharing his thoughts on a new theory of animal development. He started by saying:—
We are here to inaugurate the Geological Hall, which has grown out of the geological survey of the State. To make the occasion memorable, a distinguished statesman of your own State, and Mr. Frank C. Gray, were expected to be present and address you. The pressure of public duties has detained Mr. Seward, and severe sickness has detained Mr. Gray. I deeply lament that the occasion is lost to you to hear my friend Mr. Gray, who is a devotee to science, and as warm-hearted a friend as ever I knew. Night before last I was requested to assist in taking their place—I, who am the most unfit of men for the post. I never made a speech. I have addressed learned bodies, but I lack that liberty of speech—the ability to present in finished style, and with that rich imagery which characterize the words of the orator, the thoughts fitting to such an occasion as this. He would limit himself, he continued, to presenting some motives [5]why the community should patronize science, and foster such institutions as this. We scientific men regard this as an occasion of the highest interest, and thus do not hesitate to give the sanction of the highest learned body of the country as an indorsement of the liberality of this State. The geological survey of New York has given to the world a new nomenclature. No geologist can, hereafter, describe the several strata of the earth without referring to it. Its results, as recorded in your published volumes, are treasured in the most valuable libraries of the world. They have made this city famous; and now, when the scientific geologist lands on your shore, his first question is, "Which is the way to Albany? I want to see your fossils." But Paleontology is only one branch of the subject, and many others your survey has equally fostered.
We are here to open the Geological Hall, which has come out of the geological survey of the State. To make this event special, a well-known statesman from your State, along with Mr. Frank C. Gray, was supposed to be here to speak to you. Unfortunately, public duties have kept Mr. Seward away, and serious illness has prevented Mr. Gray from joining us. I truly regret that you will miss hearing my friend Mr. Gray, who is dedicated to science and a genuinely warm-hearted friend. The night before last, I was asked to step in for them—I, who am the least suited for this role. I’ve never given a speech before. I've talked to learned groups, but I lack the ease of expression—the ability to articulate in a polished manner, with the vivid imagery that characterizes a great speaker’s words, fitting for an occasion like this. I will limit myself, he continued, to sharing some reasons [5] why our community should support science and promote institutions like this one. We, the scientists, see this as a highly important event, and therefore are proud to have the endorsement of the most esteemed academic body in the country as a testament to the generosity of this State. The geological survey of New York has introduced a new naming system to the world. No geologist can describe the various layers of the earth without referencing it from now on. The findings, as documented in your published volumes, are held in the most prestigious libraries around the globe. They have made this city well-known; now, when a scientific geologist arrives on your shores, the first question is, "How do I get to Albany? I want to see your fossils." But Paleontology is just one field among many that your survey has equally supported.
He next proceeded to show that organized beings were organized with reference to a plan, which the relations between different animals, and between different plants, and between animals and plants, everywhere exhibit;—drew sections of the body of a fish, and of the bird, and of man, and pointed out that in each there was the same central back-bone, the cavity above and the ribbed cavity below the flesh on each side, and the skin over all—showing that the maker of each possessed the same thought—followed the same plan of structure. And upon that plan He had made all the kinds of quadrupeds, 2,000 in number, all the kinds of birds, 7,000 in number, all of the reptiles, 2,000 to 3,000 in number, all the fish, 10,000 to 12,000 in number. All their forms may be derived as different expressions of the same formula. There are only four of these great types; or, said he, may I not call them the four tunes on which Divinity has played the harmonies that have peopled, in living and beautiful reality, the whole world?
He then went on to demonstrate that living beings are organized according to a plan, which is reflected in the relationships between different animals, between different plants, and between animals and plants everywhere. He sketched diagrams of the body of a fish, a bird, and a human, highlighting that each had the same central backbone, the cavity above, and the ribbed cavity below the flesh on each side, with skin covering everything. This showed that the creator of each had the same idea and followed the same structural plan. Based on that plan, He created all kinds of quadrupeds, numbering about 2,000, all kinds of birds, around 7,000, all reptiles, between 2,000 and 3,000, and all fish, between 10,000 and 12,000. All their forms can be seen as different expressions of the same basic formula. There are only four of these main types; or, might I say, can I not call them the four tunes on which the Divine has played the harmonies that have filled the world with living and beautiful reality?
PROFESSOR HITCHCOCK ON REMINISCENCES.
PROFESSOR HITCHCOCK ON MEMORIES.
Erastus C. Benedict, Esq. of New York, introduced Prof. Hitchcock, of Amherst, as a gentleman whose name was very familiar, who had laid aside, voluntarily, the charge of one of the largest colleges in New England, but who could never lay aside the honors he had earned in the literature and science of geology.
Erastus C. Benedict, Esq. from New York, introduced Prof. Hitchcock from Amherst, as a well-known gentleman who had willingly stepped down from leading one of the biggest colleges in New England, but could never let go of the accolades he earned in the fields of literature and science of geology.
After a few introductory observations, Prof. Hitchcock said:—
After a few introductory comments, Prof. Hitchcock said:—
This, I believe, is the first example in which a State Government in our country has erected a museum for the exhibition of its natural resources, its mineral and rock, its plants and animals, living and fossil. And this seems to me the most appropriate spot in the country for placing the first geological hall erected by the Government; for the County of Albany was the district where the first geological survey was undertaken, on this side of the Atlantic, and, perhaps, the world. This was in 1820, and ordered by that eminent philanthropist, Stephen Van Rensselaer, who, three years later, appointed Prof. Eaton to survey, in like manner, the whole region traversed by the Erie Canal. This was the commencement of a work, which, during the last thirty years, has had a wonderful expansion, reaching a large part of the States of the Union, as well as Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick, and, I might add, several European countries, where the magnificent surveys now in progress did not commence till after the survey of Albany and Rensselaer Counties. How glad are we, therefore, to find on this spot the first Museum of Economical Geology on this side of the Atlantic! Nay, embracing as it does all the department of Natural History, I see in it more than a European Museum of Economical Geology, splendid though they are. I fancy, rather, that I see here the germ of a Cis-Atlantic British Museum, or Garden of Plants.
I believe this is the first instance where a state government in our country has set up a museum to showcase its natural resources, including minerals and rocks, plants and animals, both living and fossilized. This seems to be the most fitting location in the country for establishing the first geological hall built by the government, as Albany County was where the first geological survey was conducted on this side of the Atlantic—and perhaps in the world. This happened in 1820, initiated by the notable philanthropist, Stephen Van Rensselaer, who three years later appointed Prof. Eaton to survey the entire area around the Erie Canal in the same way. This marked the start of a project that, over the last thirty years, has significantly expanded, covering a large part of the U.S. states, as well as Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick; and I should mention several European countries, where impressive surveys currently underway only began after the surveys of Albany and Rensselaer Counties. So we are delighted to find the first Museum of Economical Geology on this side of the Atlantic at this location! Moreover, since it encompasses all areas of Natural History, I see it as more than just a European Museum of Economical Geology, splendid as they are. Instead, I see here the beginning of a Cis-Atlantic British Museum or a Garden of Plants.
North Carolina was the first State that ordered a geological survey; and I have the pleasure of seeing before me the gentleman who executed it, and in 1824-5 published a report of 140 pages. I refer to Professor Olmstead, who, though he has since won brighter laurels in another department of science, will always be honored as the first commissioned State geologist in our land.
North Carolina was the first state to order a geological survey, and I have the pleasure of seeing before me the man who carried it out and published a 140-page report in 1824-1825. I'm talking about Professor Olmstead, who, although he has since achieved greater recognition in another field of science, will always be respected as our country's first state geologist.
Of the New York State Survey he said:—
Of the New York State Survey, he said:—
This survey has developed the older fossiliferous rocks, with a fullness and distinctness unknown elsewhere. Hence European savans study the New York Reports with eagerness. In 1850, as I entered the Woodwardian Museum, in the University of Cambridge, in England, I found Professor McCoy busy with a collection of Silurian fossils before him, which he was studying with Hall's first volume of Paleontology as his guide; and in the splendid volumes, entitled British Paleozoric Rocks and Fossils, which appeared last year as the result of those researches, I find Professor Hall denominated the great American Paleontologist. I tell you, Sir, that this survey has given New York a reputation throughout the learned world, of which she may well be proud. Am I told that it will, probably, cost half a million? Very well. The larger the sum, the higher will be the reputation of New York for liberality; and what other half million expended in our country, has developed so many new facts or thrown so much light upon the history of the globe, or won so world-wide and enviable a reputation?
This survey has developed the older fossil-rich rocks with a completeness and clarity never seen before. As a result, European scholars eagerly study the New York Reports. In 1850, when I entered the Woodwardian Museum at the University of Cambridge in England, I found Professor McCoy examining a collection of Silurian fossils while using Hall's first volume of Paleontology as his reference. In the impressive volumes titled British Paleozoic Rocks and Fossils, published last year from these studies, Professor Hall is referred to as the great American Paleontologist. I tell you, Sir, that this survey has given New York a reputation in the academic world that she can rightly be proud of. If I’m told it will probably cost half a million? That’s fine. The larger the amount, the greater New York's reputation for generosity will be. What other half million spent in our country has produced so many new findings, shed so much light on the history of the planet, or earned such a globally recognized and admired reputation?
And of Geological Surveys in general:—
And of Geological Surveys in general:—
In regard to this matter of geological surveys, I can hardly avoid making a suggestion here. So large a portion of our country has now been examined, more or less thoroughly, by the several State governments, that it does seem to me the time has come when the National government should order a survey—geological, zoological, and botanical—of the whole country, on such a liberal and thorough plan as the surveys in Great Britain are now conducted; in the latter country it being understood that at least thirty years will be occupied in the work. Could not the distinguished New York statesman who was to have addressed us to-day be induced, when the present great struggle in which he is engaged shall have been brought to a close, by a merciful Providence, to introduce this subject, and urge it upon Congress? And would it not be appropriate for the American Association for the Advancement of Science to throw a petition before the government for such an object? Or might it not, with the consent of the eminent gentleman who has charge of the Coast Survey, be connected therewith, as it is with the Ordnance Survey in Great Britain.
Regarding the issue of geological surveys, I can't help but make a suggestion. A large part of our country has already been examined, to varying degrees, by the different State governments, so it seems to me that the time has come for the National government to conduct a comprehensive survey—geological, zoological, and botanical—of the entire country, based on a generous and thorough plan similar to the surveys being carried out in Great Britain, where it's expected that the work will take at least thirty years. Could we persuade the prominent New York statesman who was supposed to speak to us today, once he finishes his current important commitments, to bring up this topic and advocate for it in Congress? And wouldn’t it be fitting for the American Association for the Advancement of Science to submit a petition to the government in support of this initiative? Or could it possibly be organized in conjunction with the distinguished individual overseeing the Coast Survey, similar to how it is associated with the Ordnance Survey in Great Britain?
The history of the American Association was then given:—
The history of the American Association was then provided:—
Prof. Mather, I believe, through Prof. Emmons, first suggested to the New-York Board of Geologists in November, 1838, in a letter proposing a number of points for their consideration. I quote from him the following paragraph relating to the meeting. As to the credit he has here given me of having personally suggested the subject, I can say only that I had been in the habit for several years of making this meeting of scientific men a sort of hobby in my correspondence with such. Whether others did the same, I did not then, and do not now know. Were this the proper place, I could go more into detail on this point; but I will merely quote Prof. Mather's language to the Board:—
Prof. Mather, I believe, first suggested to the New York Board of Geologists in November 1838, through Prof. Emmons, in a letter proposing several points for their consideration. I quote the following paragraph from him regarding the meeting. As for the credit he has given me for personally suggesting the topic, I can only say that I had been making this gathering of scientists a sort of hobby in my correspondence with others for several years. Whether others did the same, I didn’t know then and still don’t know now. If this were the right place, I could elaborate more on this point; but I will just quote Prof. Mather's words to the Board:—
* * * * "Would it not be well to suggest the propriety of a meeting of Geologists and other scientific men of our country at some central point next fall,—say at New-York or Philadelphia? There are many questions in our Geology that will receive new light from friendly discussion and the combined observations of various individuals who have noted them in different parts of our country. Such a meeting has been suggested by Prof. Hitchcock; and to me it seems desirable. It would undoubtedly be an advantage not only to science but to the several surveys that are now in progress and that may in future be authorized. It would tend to make known our scientific men to each other personally, give them more confidence in each other, and cause them to concentrate their observation on those questions that are of interest in either a scientific or economical point of view. More questions may be satisfactorily [7]settled in a day by oral discussion in such a body, than a year by writing and publication."[A]
* * * * "Wouldn't it be a good idea to organize a meeting of geologists and other scientists from our country at a central location next fall—maybe in New York or Philadelphia? There are many questions in our geology that could benefit from friendly discussions and the combined observations of various individuals who have studied them in different parts of our nation. This meeting has been suggested by Professor Hitchcock, and I think it would be beneficial. It would certainly help not only science but also the various surveys that are currently in progress and those that may be authorized in the future. It would allow our scientists to get to know each other personally, build confidence in one another, and focus their observations on questions that are important from both scientific and economic perspectives. More questions can be effectively addressed in a day through oral discussions in such a gathering than could be resolved in a year through writing and publication."[7]
[A] In the letter alluded to, on examination, we discover another passage bearing on the point, which, owing to the Professor's modesty we suspect, he did not read. Prof. Mather adds. "You, so far as I know, first suggested the matter of such an Association. I laid the matter before the Board of Geologists of New-York, specifying some of the advantages that might be expected to result; and Prof. Vanuxem probably made the motion before the Board in regard to it."
[A] In the letter mentioned, we find another section relevant to the topic, which, because of the Professor's modesty, we think he may have skipped. Prof. Mather adds, "As far as I know, you were the one who initially suggested the idea of such an Association. I presented this to the Board of Geologists of New York, outlining some of the benefits that could be expected. Prof. Vanuxem likely made the motion regarding this before the Board."
Though the Board adopted the plan of a meeting, various causes delayed the first over till April, 1840, when we assembled in Philadelphia, and spent a week in most profitable and pleasant discussion, and the presentation of papers. Our number that year was only 18, because confined almost exclusively to the State geologists; but the next year, when we met again in Philadelphia, and a more extended invitation was given, about eighty were present; and the members have been increasing to the present time. But, in fact, those first two meetings proved the type, in all things essential, of all that have followed. The principal changes have been those of expansion and the consequent introduction of many other branches of science with their eminent cultivators. In 1842, we changed the name to that of the Association of American Geologists and Naturalists; and in 1847, to that of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. I trust it has not yet reached its fullest development, as our country and its scientific men multiply, and new fields of discovery open.
Though the Board planned a meeting, various factors delayed the first one until April 1840, when we gathered in Philadelphia and spent a week in productive and enjoyable discussions and presentations. That year, our number was only 18, mainly consisting of state geologists; but the next year, when we met again in Philadelphia and issued a broader invitation, about eighty attended, and our membership has been growing ever since. In fact, those first two meetings set the standard for everything essential that followed. The main changes have been related to expansion and the subsequent inclusion of many other scientific fields and their prominent contributors. In 1842, we changed the name to the Association of American Geologists and Naturalists; and in 1847, to the American Association for the Advancement of Science. I hope it has not yet reached its fullest potential, as our country and its scientists continue to grow, and new areas of discovery emerge.
Prof. H. said of this particular occasion:—
Prof. H. commented on this specific occasion:—
We may be quite sure that this Hall will be a center of deep interest to coming generations. Long after we shall have passed away will the men of New-York, as they survey these monuments, feel stimulated to engage in other noble enterprises by this work of their progenitors, and from many a distant part of the civilized world will men come here to solve their scientific questions, and to bring far-off regions into comparison with this. New-York, then, by her liberal patronage, has not only acquired an honorable name among those living in all civilized lands, but has secured the voice of History to transmit her fame to far-off generations.
We can be sure that this Hall will be a center of great interest for future generations. Long after we're gone, people in New York will feel inspired to take on other noble projects when they see these monuments, and individuals from all around the civilized world will come here to explore their scientific inquiries and compare distant places with this one. By generously supporting this endeavor, New York has not only gained a respected reputation among people in all civilized nations but has also ensured that History will carry her legacy to future generations.
SIR WILLIAM LOGAN ASKS "THE WAY TO ALBANY."
SIR WILLIAM LOGAN ASKS "THE WAY TO ALBANY."
Sir William E. Logan, of Canada, in a brief speech acknowledged the services rendered by the New-York Survey to Canada. He should manifest ingratitude if he declined to unite in the joyful occasion of inaugurating the Museum which was to hold forever the evidence of the truth of its published results. The Survey of Canada had been ordered, and the Commission of five years twice renewed; and the last time, the provision for it was more than doubled. It happened to him, as Mr. Agassiz had said: after crossing the ocean first, the first thing he asked was, "Which is the way to Albany?" and when he arrived here, he found that with the aid of Prof. Hall's discoveries, he had only to take up the different formations as he had left them on the boundary line, and follow them into Canada. It was both a convenience and a necessity to adopt the New-York nomenclature, which was thus extended over an area six times as large as New-York. In Paris he heard De Vernier using the words Trenton and Niagara, as if they were household words. He was delighted to witness the impatience with which Barron inquired when the remaining volumes of the Paleontology of New-York would be published. Your Paleontological reputation, said he, has made New-York known, even among men not scientific, all over Europe. I hope you will not stop here, but will go on and give us in equally thorough, full, and magnificent style, the character of the Durassic and Cretaceous formations.
Sir William E. Logan from Canada, in a brief speech, recognized the contributions of the New-York Survey to Canada. It would be ungrateful for him not to join in the celebration of the opening of the Museum, which would forever showcase the truth of its published findings. The Canadian Survey had been initiated, and the Commission had been renewed twice over five years; the last time, the funding was more than doubled. It was similar to what Mr. Agassiz mentioned: after crossing the ocean, the first question he asked was, "Which way to Albany?" and upon arriving, he discovered that with the help of Prof. Hall's findings, he could easily pick up the different formations just as he had found them on the boundary line and trace them into Canada. It was both convenient and necessary to adopt the New-York terminology, which was then expanded over an area six times larger than New-York. In Paris, he heard De Vernier casually using the terms Trenton and Niagara as if they were common knowledge. He was thrilled to see how eagerly Barron asked when the remaining volumes of the Paleontology of New-York would be released. "Your Paleontological reputation," he remarked, "has made New-York well-known, even among those who are not scientists, all across Europe. I hope you won't stop here, but continue to provide us with an equally thorough, comprehensive, and magnificent account of the Jurassic and Cretaceous formations."
PROFESSOR HENRY ON DUTCHMEN.
PROFESSOR HENRY ON DUTCH PEOPLE.
Professor Henry was at a loss to know by what process they had arrived at the conclusion that seven men of science must be substituted to fill the place of one distinguished statesman whom they had expected to hear. He prided [8]himself on his Albany nativity. He was proud of the old Dutch character, that was the substratum of the city. The Dutch are hard to be moved, but when they do start their momentum is not as other men's in proportion to the velocity, but as the square of the velocity. So when the Dutchman goes three times as fast, he has nine times the force of another man. The Dutchman has an immense potentia agency, but it wants a small spark of Yankee enterprise to touch it off. In this strain the Professor continued, making his audience very merry, and giving them a fine chance to express themselves with repeated explosions of laughter.
Professor Henry was confused about how they had reached the conclusion that seven scientists needed to replace one distinguished statesman they had expected to hear from. He took pride in being from Albany. He valued the old Dutch character that formed the foundation of the city. The Dutch are tough to move, but when they do get going, their momentum isn't like anyone else's; it’s proportional to the square of their speed. So when a Dutchman moves three times faster, he has nine times the force of another person. The Dutchman has huge potential energy, but it just needs a small spark of Yankee initiative to kickstart it. With this line of thought, the Professor kept going, making his audience laugh a lot and giving them plenty of opportunities to express themselves with bursts of laughter.
PROFESSOR DAVIES ON THE PRACTICAL NATURE OF SCIENCE.
PROFESSOR DAVIES ON THE PRACTICAL SIDE OF SCIENCE.
Prof. Charles Davies was introduced by Ex-Governor Seymour, and spoke briefly, but humorously and very much to the point, in defense of the practical character of scientific researches. He said that to one accustomed to speak only on the abstract quantities of number and space, this was an unusual occasion, and this an unusual audience; and inquired how he could discuss the abstract forms of geometry, when he saw before him, in such profusion, the most beautiful real forms that Providence has vouchsafed to the life of man. He proposed to introduce and develop but a single train of thought—the unchangeable connection between what in common language is called the theoretical and practical, but in more technical phraseology, the ideal and the actual. The actual, or true practical, consists in the uses of the forces of nature, according to the laws of nature; and here we must distinguish between it and the empirical, which uses, or attempts to use, those forces, without a knowledge of the laws. The true practical, therefore, is the result, or actual, of an antecedent ideal. The ideal, full and complete, must exist in the mind before the actual can be brought forth according to the laws of science. Who, then, are the truly practical men of our age? Are they not those who are engaged most laboriously and successfully in investigating the great laws? Are they not those who are pressing out the boundaries of knowledge, and conducting the mind into new and unexplored regions, where there may yet be discovered a California of undeveloped thought? Is not the gentleman from Massachusetts (Professor Agassiz) the most practical man in our country in the department of Natural History, not because he has collected the greatest number of specimens, but because he has laid open to us all the laws of the animal kingdom? Are the formulas written on the black-board by the gentleman from Cambridge (Prof. Pierce) of no practical value, because they cannot be read by the uninstructed eye? A single line may contain the elements of the motions of all the heavenly bodies; and the eye of science, taking its stand-point at the center of gravity of the system, will see in the equation the harmonious revolutions of all the bodies which circle the heavens. It is such labors and such generalizations that have rendered his name illustrious in the history of mathematical science. Is it of no practical value that the Chief of the Coast Survey (Prof. Bache), by a few characters written upon paper, at Washington, has determined the exact time of high and low tide in the harbor of Boston, and can determine, by a similar process, the exact times of high and low water at every point on the surface of the globe? Are not these results, the highest efforts of science, also of the greatest practical utility? And may we not, then, conclude that there is nothing truly practical which is not the consequence of an antecedent ideal?
Prof. Charles Davies was introduced by Former Governor Seymour and spoke briefly, but in a humorous and straightforward way, defending the practical nature of scientific research. He mentioned that for someone used to discussing only abstract concepts of numbers and space, this was a unique occasion with a unique audience. He questioned how he could talk about the abstract ideas of geometry when he was surrounded by the beautiful real forms that nature has given to humanity. He planned to explore just one main idea—the unbreakable link between what we typically call theoretical and practical, or in more technical terms, the ideal and the actual. The actual, or true practical, involves using the forces of nature according to natural laws; we must distinguish this from the empirical, which tries to use those forces without understanding the underlying laws. Therefore, the true practical is the result of a preceding ideal. The ideal must be fully formed in the mind before the actual can manifest according to scientific laws. So, who are the truly practical people of our time? Aren't they those who are working hard and successfully to uncover the fundamental laws? Aren't they the ones expanding the limits of knowledge and guiding us into new and unexplored areas, where there might still be a wealth of untapped ideas? Isn't the gentleman from Massachusetts (Professor Agassiz) the most practical person in our country in the field of Natural History, not because he has gathered the most specimens, but because he has revealed to us all the laws of the animal kingdom? Do the formulas written on the blackboard by the gentleman from Cambridge (Prof. Pierce) hold no practical value just because they're not understandable to the untrained eye? A single line could encompass the elements of the movements of all celestial bodies; and with a scientific perspective centered on the system's center of gravity, one can see in the equation the harmonious orbits of all the bodies that traverse the sky. It's such efforts and generalizations that have made his name famous in the history of mathematical science. Isn't it practical that the Chief of the Coast Survey (Prof. Bache), with just a few symbols written on paper in Washington, has calculated the precise times of high and low tide in Boston Harbor, and can similarly determine the exact times of high and low water at any point on Earth? Aren't these findings, the pinnacle of scientific achievement, also extremely useful? Therefore, can we not conclude that nothing truly practical exists without being the result of a preceding ideal?
Science is to art what the great fly-wheel and governor of a steam-engine are to the working part of the machinery—it guides, regulates, and controls the whole. Science and art are inseparably connected; like the Siamese Twins, they cannot be separated without producing the death of both.
Science is to art what the main flywheel and governor of a steam engine are to the working parts of the machine—it guides, regulates, and controls everything. Science and art are closely linked; like Siamese twins, they cannot be separated without causing the death of both.
How, then, are we to regard the superb specimens of natural history, which the liberality, the munificence; and the wisdom of our State have collected at the Capitol? They are the elements from which we can here determine all that belongs to the Natural History of our State; and may we not indulge the hope, [9]that science and genius will come here, and, striking them with a magic wand, cause the true practical to spring into immortal life?
How should we view the amazing examples of natural history that the generosity, wealth, and wisdom of our State have gathered at the Capitol? They provide the foundation for understanding everything related to the Natural History of our State; and can we not hope, [9]that science and creativity will come here and, with a wave of a magic wand, bring the true practical aspects to life in a timeless way?
Remarks were also uttered by Prof. Chester Dewey, President Anderson, and Rev. Dr. Cox.
Remarks were also made by Prof. Chester Dewey, President Anderson, and Rev. Dr. Cox.
And thus ended the Inauguration of the State Geological Hall.
And so, the Inauguration of the State Geological Hall came to a close.
We turn to the Observatory, in regular order of succession.
We move on to the Observatory in the usual order of succession.
INAUGURATION OF DUDLEY OBSERVATORY.
The Inauguration of the Dudley Observatory took place under the same tent which was appropriated to the dedication of the Geological Hall, and on the day following that event. An immense audience was assembled, drawn by the announcement of Mr. Everett's Oration.
The Inauguration of the Dudley Observatory happened under the same tent used for the dedication of the Geological Hall, and it was on the day after that event. A huge crowd gathered, attracted by the announcement of Mr. Everett's Oration.
At a little past three o'clock the procession of savans arrived from the Assembly Chamber, escorted by the Burgesses Corps. Directly in front of the speaker's stand sat Mrs. Dudley, the venerable lady to whose munificence the world is indebted for this Observatory. She was dressed in an antique, olive-colored silk, with a figure of a lighter color, a heavy, red broché shawl, and her bonnet, cap, &c., after the strictest style of the old school. Her presence added a new point of interest.
At a little past three o'clock, the procession of savans arrived from the Assembly Chamber, escorted by the Burgesses Corps. Right in front of the speaker's stand sat Mrs. Dudley, the esteemed lady to whom the world owes this Observatory. She was wearing an old-fashioned olive-colored silk dress, a lighter-colored figure, a heavy red broché shawl, and her bonnet, cap, etc., all in the most traditional style. Her presence added a new point of interest.
Prayer having been uttered by Rev. Dr. Sprague, of Albany, Thomas W. Olcott, Esq., introduced to the audience Ex-Governor Washington Hunt, who spoke briefly in honor of the memory of Charles E. Dudley, whose widow has founded and in part endowed this Observatory with a liberality so remarkable.
Prayer was offered by Rev. Dr. Sprague from Albany. Thomas W. Olcott, Esq., introduced the audience to Ex-Governor Washington Hunt, who spoke briefly to honor the memory of Charles E. Dudley. His widow has generously founded and partly funded this Observatory with remarkable generosity.
Remarks were offered by Dr. B. A. Gould and Prof. A. D. Bache, and
Judge Harris read the following letter from Mrs. Dudley, announcing another
munificent donation in aid of the new Observatory—$50,000, in addition to the
$25,000 which had been already expended in the construction of the building.
The letter was received with shouts of applause, Prof. Agassiz rising and leading
the vast assemblage in three vehement cheers in honor of Mrs. Dudley!
Remarks were given by Dr. B. A. Gould and Prof. A.D. Bache, and Judge Harris read the following letter from Mrs. Dudley, announcing another generous donation to support the new Observatory—$50,000, in addition to the $25,000 that had already been spent on building it. The letter was met with loud applause, with Prof. Agassiz standing up and leading the large crowd in three enthusiastic cheers for Mrs. Dudley!
Albany, Thursday, Aug. 14, 1856.
Albany, Thursday, Aug. 14, 1856.
To the Trustees of the Dudley Observatory:
Gentlemen,—I scarcely need refer in a letter to you to the modest beginning
and gradual growth of the institution over which you preside, and of which you
are the responsible guardians. But we have arrived at a period in its history
when its inauguration gives to it and to you some degree of prominence, and
which must stamp our past efforts with weakness and inconsideration, or exalt
those of the future to the measure of liberality necessary to certain success.
To the Trustees of the Dudley Observatory:
Guys,—I hardly need to mention in this letter the humble beginnings and gradual development of the institution you oversee and are responsible for. However, we've reached a point in its history where its launch brings it and you a certain level of recognition, and this moment will either highlight the shortcomings of our past efforts or elevate our future endeavors to the level of generosity needed for genuine success.
You have a building erected and instruments engaged of unrivaled excellence; and it now remains to carry out the suggestion of the Astronomer Royal of England in giving permanency to the establishment. The very distinguished Professors Bache, Pierce, and Gould, state in a letter, which I have been permitted to see, that to expand this institution to the wants of American science and the honors of a national character, will require an investment which will yield annually not less than $10,000; and these gentlemen say, in the letter referred to,—
You have a building set up and top-notch equipment in place; now it’s important to follow the advice of the Astronomer Royal of England to make this establishment permanent. The highly respected professors Bachelor, Pierce, and Gould mentioned in a letter that I was allowed to see, that to expand this institution to meet the needs of American science and reflect a national prestige, an investment yielding at least $10,000 annually will be required; and these gentlemen state in the referenced letter,—
"If the greatness of your giving can rise to this occasion, as it has to all our previous suggestions, with such unflinching magnanimity, we promise you our earnest and hearty coöperation, and stake our reputation that the scientific success shall fill up the measure of your hopes and anticipations."
"If your generosity can match this moment, just like it has with all our past suggestions, with such unwavering kindness, we promise you our genuine and enthusiastic support, and we guarantee that the scientific success will meet your hopes and expectations."
For the attainment of an object so rich in scientific reward and national glory, guaranteed by men with reputations as exalted and enduring as the skies upon which they are written, contributions should be general, and not confined to an individual or a place.
For achieving a goal that brings great scientific benefits and national pride, supported by individuals whose reputations are as high and lasting as the skies they are written in, contributions should be widespread and not limited to one person or location.
For myself, I offer, as my part of the required endowment, the sum of $50,000 in addition to the advances which I have already made; and, trusting that the name which you have given to the Observatory may not be regarded as an undeserved compliment, and that it will not diminish the public regard by giving to the institution a seemingly individual character,
For my part, I’m contributing $50,000 on top of the money I’ve already given. I hope that the name you’ve chosen for the Observatory is seen as a well-deserved honor and that it won’t lessen public appreciation by making the institution seem too personalized.
I remain, Gentlemen, your obedient servant,
BLANDINA DUDLEY.
I remain, gentlemen, your loyal servant,
BLANDINA DUDLEY.
Judge Harris then introduced the Orator of the occasion, Hon. Edward Everett, whose speech is given verbatim in these pages.
Judge Harris then introduced the speaker for the event, Hon. Edward Everett, whose speech is presented word for word on these pages.
THE INSTRUMENTS OF THE DUDLEY OBSERVATORY.
THE INSTRUMENTS OF THE DUDLEY OBSERVATORY.
During the Sessions of the American Association, the new Astronomical Instruments of Dudley Observatory were described in detail by Dr. B. A. Gould, who is the Astronomer in charge. We condense his statements:—
During the meetings of the American Association, Dr. B. A. Gould, the Astronomer in charge, gave a detailed description of the new astronomical instruments at Dudley Observatory. Here’s a summary of his remarks:—
The Meridian Circle and Transit instrument were ordered from Pistor & Martins, the celebrated manufacturers of Berlin, by whom the new instrument at Ann Arbor was made. A number of improvements have been introduced in the Albany instruments, not perhaps all absolutely new, but an eclectic combination of late adaptations with new improvements. Dr. Gould made a distinction of modern astronomical instruments into two classes, the English and the German. The English is the massive type; the German, light and airy. The English instrument is the instrument of the engineer; the German, the instrument of the artist. In ordering the instruments for the Albany Observatory, the Doctor preferred the German type and discarded the heavier English. He instanced, as a specimen of the latter, the new instrument at Greenwich, recently erected under the superintendence of the Astronomer Royal. That instrument registers observations in single seconds; the Dudley instrument will register to tenths of seconds. That has six or eight microscopes; this has four. That has a gas lamp, by the light of which the graduations are read off; the Albany instrument has no lamp, and the Doctor considered the lamp a hazardous experiment, affecting the integrity of the experiment, not only by its radiant heat but by the currents of heated air which it produces. The diameter of the object-glass of the Albany instrument is 7½ French inches clear aperture, or 8 English inches, and the length of the tube 8 feet. He would have preferred an instrument in which the facilities of manipulation would have been greater, but was hampered by one proviso, upon which the Trustees of the institution insisted—that this should be the biggest instrument of its kind; and the instruction was obeyed. The glass was made by Chance, and ground by Pistor himself. The eye-piece is fitted with two micrometers, for vertical and horizontal observations. Another apparatus provides for the detection and measurement of the flexure of the tube. Much trouble was experienced in securing a good casting for the steel axis of the instrument. Three were found imperfect under the lathe, and the fourth was chosen; but even then the pivots were made in separate pieces, which were set in very deeply and welded. Dr. Gould said he had been requested by the gentlemen who had this enterprise in charge to suggest, as a mark of respect to a gentleman of Albany who was a munificent patron of Science, that this instrument be known as the Olcott Meridian Circle.
The Meridian Circle and Transit instrument were ordered from Pistor & Martins, the famous manufacturers in Berlin, who created the new instrument for Ann Arbor. Several improvements have been introduced in the Albany instruments, not all of which are entirely new, but rather a mix of recent adaptations and new enhancements. Dr. Gould categorized modern astronomical instruments into two types: the English and the German. The English is the heavier type, while the German is light and delicate. The English instrument is suited for engineers; the German is for artists. When ordering instruments for the Albany Observatory, the Doctor chose the German model and rejected the heavier English option. He cited the new instrument at Greenwich, recently built under the guidance of the Astronomer Royal, as an example of the English type. That instrument records observations in single seconds, while the Dudley instrument will record to tenths of seconds. The Greenwich model has six or eight microscopes; the Albany instrument has four. The Greenwich instrument uses a gas lamp to read off the graduations, but the Albany instrument has no lamp, as the Doctor considered it a risky experiment that could compromise the results, both from its heat and the currents of warm air it generates. The diameter of the object-glass of the Albany instrument is 7½ French inches clear aperture, or 8 English inches, and the length of the tube is 8 feet. He would have preferred an instrument with more handling options but was constrained by one condition insisted upon by the institution's Trustees—that this would be the largest instrument of its type; and that request was followed. The glass was made by Chance and ground by Pistor himself. The eyepiece is equipped with two micrometers for vertical and horizontal observations. Another device allows for the detection and measurement of tube flexure. There was considerable difficulty in obtaining a good casting for the steel axis of the instrument, with three being found defective under the lathe, and the fourth was selected; however, even then the pivots were made in separate pieces, which were set deeply and welded. Dr. Gould mentioned that he was asked by the gentlemen overseeing this project to suggest, as a tribute to a gentleman from Albany who was a generous supporter of Science, that this instrument be named the Olcott Meridian Circle.
WHAT THE DUDLEY OBSERVATORY IS.
WHAT DUDLEY OBSERVATORY IS.
It stands a mile from the Capitol, in the city of Albany, upon the crest of a hill, so difficult of approach, as to be in reality a Hill of Science. There are two ways of getting to it. In both cases there are rail fences to be clambered over, and long grass to wade through, settlements to explore, and a clayey road to travel; but these are minor troubles. The elevation of the hill above tide-water [11]is, perhaps, 200 feet; its distance from the Capitol about a mile and a half. The view for miles is unimpeded; and the Observatory is belted about with woods and verdant lawns. There could not be a finer location or a purer air. The plateau contains some fifteen acres.
It’s a mile from the Capitol, in the city of Albany, on top of a hill that's hard to reach, making it truly a Hill of Science. There are two ways to get there. In both cases, you have to climb over rail fences, wade through tall grass, explore some settlements, and travel down a dirt road, but these are minor inconveniences. The hill is about 200 feet above sea level, and it's roughly a mile and a half from the Capitol. The view for miles is unobstructed, and the Observatory is surrounded by woods and green lawns. You couldn’t ask for a better location or fresher air. The plateau covers about fifteen acres.
The Observatory is constructed in the form of a Latin cross. Its eastern arm is an apartment 22 by 24 feet, in which the meridian circle is to be placed. The western arm is a room of the same dimensions, intended for the transit instrument. From the north and south faces of both rooms are semi-circular apsides, projecting 6 feet 6 inches, containing the Collimator piers and the vertical openings for observation. The entire length of each room is, therefore, 37 feet. In the northern arm are placed the library, 23 feet by 27 feet; two computing rooms, 12 feet by 23 feet each; side entrance halls, staircases, &c. The southern arm contains the principal entrance, consisting of an arched colonnade of four Tuscan columns, surrounded by a pediment. A broad flight of stone steps leads to this colonnade; and through the entrance door beneath it to the main central hall, 28 feet square, in which are placed (in niches) the very beautiful electric clock and pendulum presented by Erastus Corning, Esq. The center of this hall is occupied by a massive pier of stone, 10 feet square, passing from the basement into the dome above, and intended for the support of the great heliometer. Directly opposite the entrance door is a large niche, in which it is proposed to place the bust of the late Mr. Dudley. Immediately above this hall is the equatorial room, a circular apartment, 22 feet 6 inches in diameter, and 24 feet high, covered by a low conical roof, in which and in the walls are the usual observing slits. The drum, or cylindrical portion, of this room is divided into two parts—the lower one fixed, the upper, revolving on cast-iron balls moving in grooved metal plates, can command the entire horizon.
The Observatory is designed in the shape of a Latin cross. Its eastern arm features an apartment that measures 22 by 24 feet, where the meridian circle will be installed. The western arm is a room with the same dimensions, meant for the transit instrument. Both rooms have semi-circular apses projecting 6 feet 6 inches from their north and south sides, which hold the Collimator piers and the vertical openings for observation. Thus, the total length of each room is 37 feet. The northern arm houses the library, which measures 23 feet by 27 feet; two computing rooms, each 12 feet by 23 feet; side entrance halls, staircases, etc. The southern arm has the main entrance, featuring an arched colonnade with four Tuscan columns and a pediment. A wide flight of stone steps leads to this colonnade, and through the entrance door beneath it, you enter the main central hall, which is 28 feet square and has (in niches) a beautiful electric clock and pendulum gifted by Erastus Corning, Esq. The center of this hall is occupied by a massive stone pier that is 10 feet square, extending from the basement to the dome above, designed to support the large heliometer. Directly opposite the entrance door is a large niche where it's planned to place the bust of the late Mr. Dudley. Right above this hall is the equatorial room, a circular space that is 22 feet 6 inches in diameter and 24 feet high, topped with a low conical roof, which includes the usual observing slits. The cylindrical part of this room is divided into two sections—the lower one is fixed while the upper section, which rotates on cast-iron balls moving along grooved metal plates, can survey the entire horizon.
The building is in two stories—the upper of brick, with freestone quoins, impost and window and door dressings, rests upon a rusticated basement of freestone, six feet high. The style adopted is the modern Italian, of which it is a very excellent specimen. The building has been completed some time; but, in consequence of the size of the instruments now procured being greater than that originally contemplated, sundry alterations were required in the Transit and Meridian Circle rooms. These consist of the semi-circular projections already mentioned, and which, by varying the outlines of the building, will add greatly to its beauty and picturesqueness.
The building has two stories—the upper part is made of brick, with freestone corners, and decorative details around the windows and doors, sitting on a six-foot-high rusticated freestone basement. The style is modern Italian, and it's a really great example of that design. The building was finished a while ago, but because the size of the instruments obtained is larger than initially planned, several changes were needed in the Transit and Meridian Circle rooms. These changes include the semi-circular projections mentioned earlier, which will enhance the building's appearance and charm by altering its outlines.
The piers for the Meridian Circle and Transit have, after careful investigation, been procured from the Lockport quarries. The great density and uniformity of the structure of the stone, and the facility with which such large masses as are required for this purpose can be procured there, have induced the selection of these quarries. The stones will weigh from six and a half to eight tons each.
The piers for the Meridian Circle and Transit have, after thorough investigation, been sourced from the Lockport quarries. The high density and uniform structure of the stone, along with the ease of obtaining the large masses needed for this purpose, have led to the choice of these quarries. Each stone will weigh between six and a half to eight tons.
The main building was erected from the drawings of Messrs. Woollett and Ogden, Architects, Albany; the additions and the machinery have been designed by Mr. W. Hodgins, Civil Engineer; and the latter is now being constructed under his superintendence, in a very superior manner, at the iron works of Messrs. Pruyn and Lansing, Albany.
The main building was built according to the plans of Messrs. Woollett and Ogden, Architects, Albany; the additions and machinery have been designed by Mr. W. Hodgins, Civil Engineer; and the construction is currently underway under his supervision, being done exceptionally well at the iron works of Messrs. Pruyn and Lansing, Albany.
The entire building is a tasteful and elegant structure, much superior in architectural character to any other in America devoted to a similar purpose.
The whole building is a stylish and classy structure, far better in architectural design than any other in America serving a similar purpose.
ORATION.
Fellow Citizens Of Albany:—
Albany Residents:—
Assembled as we are, under your auspices, in this ancient and hospitable city, for an object indicative of a highly-advanced stage of scientific culture, it is natural, in the first place, to cast a historical glance at the past. It seems almost to surpass belief, though an unquestioned fact, that more than a century should have passed away, after Cabot had discovered the coast of North America for England, before any knowledge was gained of the noble river on which your city stands, and which was destined by Providence to determine, in after times, the position of the commercial metropolis of the Continent. It is true that Verazzano, a bold and sagacious Florentine navigator, in the service of France, had entered the Narrows in 1524, which he describes as a very large river, deep at its mouth, which forced its way through steep hills to the sea; but though he, like all the naval adventurers of that age, was sailing westward in search of a shorter passage to India, he left this part of the coast without any attempt to ascend the river; nor can it be gathered from his narrative that he believed it to penetrate far into the interior.
As we gather here, under your leadership, in this ancient and welcoming city, for a purpose that signifies a very advanced level of scientific culture, it makes sense to take a historical look back at the past. It seems almost unbelievable, but it's an undeniable fact, that more than a hundred years passed after Cabot discovered the coast of North America for England before anyone learned about the majestic river on which your city is built, a river that was destined by Providence to later shape the location of the continent's commercial capital. It’s true that Verazzano, a brave and insightful Florentine navigator working for France, entered the Narrows in 1524, describing it as a very large river, deep at its mouth, pushing through steep hills to the sea. However, like all the explorers of that time, he was sailing west in search of a quicker route to India, and he left this part of the coast without attempting to navigate up the river; his accounts don’t suggest that he thought it extended far into the interior.
VOYAGE OF HENDRICK HUDSON.
Voyage of Hendrick Hudson.
Near a hundred years elapsed before that great thought acquired substance and form. In the spring of 1609, the heroic but unfortunate Hudson, one of the brightest names in the history of English maritime adventure, but then in the employment of the Dutch East India Company, in a vessel of eighty tons, bearing the very astronomical name of the Half Moon, having been stopped by the ice in the Polar Sea, in the attempt to reach the East by the way of Nova Zembla, struck over to the coast of America in a high northern latitude. He then stretched down southwardly to the entrance of Chesapeake Bay (of which he had gained a knowledge from the charts and descriptions of his friend, Captain Smith), thence returning to the north, entered Delaware Bay, standing out again to sea, arrived on the second of September in sight of the "high hills" of Neversink, pronouncing it "a good land to fall in with, and a pleasant land to see;" and, on the following morning, sending his boat before him to sound the way, passed Sandy Hook, [14]and there came to anchor on the third of September, 1609; two hundred and forty-seven years ago next Wednesday. What an event, my friends, in the history of American population, enterprise, commerce, intelligence, and power—the dropping of that anchor at Sandy Hook!
Nearly a hundred years passed before that great idea became real and took shape. In the spring of 1609, the heroic yet unfortunate Hudson, one of the brightest names in the history of English maritime exploration, who was then working for the Dutch East India Company, set sail on an eighty-ton ship with the very astronomical name of the Half Moon. After being stopped by ice in the Polar Sea while trying to reach the East via Nova Zembla, he navigated to the coast of America in a high northern latitude. He then moved south toward the entrance of Chesapeake Bay (which he learned about from the charts and accounts of his friend, Captain Smith), and after turning back north, he entered Delaware Bay. He ventured back out to sea and on September 2nd caught sight of the "high hills" of Neversink, describing it as "a good land to fall in with, and a pleasant land to see." The next morning, he sent his boat ahead to explore the route and passed Sandy Hook, [14] anchoring there on September 3rd, 1609; two hundred and forty-seven years ago next Wednesday. What a significant event, my friends, in the history of American population, enterprise, commerce, intelligence, and power—the dropping of that anchor at Sandy Hook!
DISCOVERY OF THE HUDSON RIVER.
Finding the Hudson River.
Here he lingered a week, in friendly intercourse with the natives of New Jersey, while a boat's company explored the waters up to Newark Bay. And now the great question. Shall he turn back, like Verazzano, or ascend the stream? Hudson was of a race not prone to turn back, by sea or by land. On the eleventh of September he raised the anchor of the Half Moon, passed through the Narrows, beholding on both sides "as beautiful a land as one can tread on;" and floated cautiously and slowly up the noble stream—the first ship that ever rested on its bosom. He passed the Palisades, nature's dark basaltic Malakoff, forced the iron gateway of the Highlands, anchored, on the fourteenth, near West Point; swept onward and upward, the following day, by grassy meadows and tangled slopes, hereafter to be covered with smiling villages;—by elevated banks and woody heights, the destined site of towns and cities—of Newburg, Poughkeepsie, Catskill;—on the evening of the fifteenth arrived opposite "the mountains which lie from the river side," where he found "a very loving people and very old men;" and the day following sailed by the spot hereafter to be honored by his own illustrious name. One more day wafts him up between Schodac and Castleton; and here he landed and passed a day with the natives,—greeted with all sorts of barbarous hospitality,—the land "the finest for cultivation he ever set foot on," the natives so kind and gentle, that when they found he would not remain with them over night, and feared that he left them—poor children of nature!—because he was afraid of their weapons,—he, whose quarter-deck was heavy with ordnance,—they "broke their arrows in pieces, and threw them in the fire." On the following morning, with the early flood-tide, on the 19th of September, 1609, the Half Moon "ran higher up, two leagues above the Shoals," and came to anchor in deep water, near the site of the present city of Albany. Happy if he could have closed his gallant career on the banks of the stream which so justly bears his name, and thus have escaped the sorrowful and mysterious catastrophe which awaited him the next year!
Here he stayed for a week, getting to know the locals of New Jersey, while a group from the boat explored the waters up to Newark Bay. And now the big question: Should he turn back like Verazzano, or continue upstream? Hudson wasn’t the type to give up easily, whether by sea or land. On September 11, he raised the anchor of the Half Moon, passed through the Narrows, seeing on both sides "the most beautiful land one could walk on;" and carefully made his way up the majestic river—the first ship ever to glide over its waters. He passed the Palisades, nature’s dark basaltic cliffs, forced the iron gateway of the Highlands, and on the fourteenth, anchored near West Point; then moved on the next day, through grassy meadows and tangled hills, which would one day be filled with cheerful villages—past high banks and wooded heights, destined to become towns and cities—like Newburg, Poughkeepsie, Catskill; on the evening of the fifteenth, he arrived across from "the mountains that rise from the riverside," where he encountered "very friendly people and very old men;" and the next day sailed by the place that would one day bear his own famous name. One more day brought him up between Schodac and Castleton; here he landed and spent a day with the locals, welcomed with all kinds of primitive hospitality—the land "the best for farming he had ever stepped on," the natives so kind and gentle, that when they realized he wouldn’t stay with them overnight and feared he was leaving—poor children of nature!—because he was scared of their weapons—he, whose quarter-deck was loaded with cannons—they "broke their arrows into pieces, and threw them in the fire." The next morning, with the early flood tide, on September 19, 1609, the Half Moon "traveled further up, two leagues above the Shoals," and came to anchor in deep water, near where Albany is today. If only he could have finished his brave journey on the banks of the river that rightly carries his name, thus avoiding the tragic and mysterious fate that awaited him the following year!
CHAMPLAIN'S VOYAGE AND THE GROWTH OF COLONIES.
CHAMPLAIN'S JOURNEY AND THE EXPANSION OF COLONIES.
But the discovery of your great river and of the site of your ancient city, is not the only event which renders the year 1609 memorable in the annals of America and the world. It was one of those years in which a sort of sympathetic movement toward great results unconsciously pervades the races and the minds of men. While Hudson discovered this mighty river [15]and this vast region for the Dutch East India Company, Champlain, in the same year, carried the lilies of France to the beautiful lake which bears his name on your northern limits; the languishing establishments of England in Virginia were strengthened by the second charter granted to that colony; the little church of Robinson removed from Amsterdam to Leyden, from which, in a few years, they went forth, to lay the foundations of New England on Plymouth Rock; the seven United Provinces of the Netherlands, after that terrific struggle of forty years (the commencement of which has just been embalmed in a record worthy of the great event by an American historian) wrested from Spain the virtual acknowledgment of their independence, in the Twelve Years' Truce; and James the First, in the same year, granted to the British East India Company their first permanent charter,—corner-stone of an empire destined in two centuries to overshadow the East.
But the discovery of your great river and the site of your ancient city isn’t the only thing that makes the year 1609 memorable in the history of America and the world. It was one of those years when a kind of shared movement towards significant outcomes unconsciously spreads among different races and minds. While Hudson discovered this mighty river [15] and this vast region for the Dutch East India Company, Champlain, in the same year, brought the French flag to the beautiful lake that bears his name on your northern border; the struggling settlements of England in Virginia were strengthened by the second charter granted to that colony; the small church of Robinson moved from Amsterdam to Leyden, from where, a few years later, they set out to establish New England on Plymouth Rock; the seven United Provinces of the Netherlands, after a brutal struggle of forty years (the start of which has just been documented in a way fitting for such a major event by an American historian) won from Spain the practical acknowledgment of their independence in the Twelve Years' Truce; and James the First, in the same year, granted the British East India Company their first permanent charter—the cornerstone of an empire that would, in two centuries, dominate the East.
GALILEO'S DISCOVERIES
Galileo's discoveries
One more incident is wanting to complete the list of the memorable occurrences which signalize the year 1609, and one most worthy to be remembered by us on this occasion. Cotemporaneously with the events which I have enumerated—eras of history, dates of empire, the starting-point in some of the greatest political, social, and moral revolutions in our annals, an Italian astronomer, who had heard of the magnifying glasses which had been made in Holland, by which distant objects could be brought seemingly near, caught at the idea, constructed a telescope, and pointed it to the heavens. Yes, my friends, in the same year in which Hudson discovered your river and the site of your ancient town, in which Robinson made his melancholy hegira from Amsterdam to Leyden, Galileo Galilei, with a telescope, the work of his own hands, discovered the phases of Venus and the satellites of Jupiter; and now, after the lapse of less than two centuries and a half, on a spot then embosomed in the wilderness—the covert of the least civilized of all the races of men—we are assembled—descendants of the Hollanders, descendants of the Pilgrims, in this ancient and prosperous city, to inaugurate the establishment of a first-class Astronomical Observatory.
One more event needs to be added to the list of memorable happenings that marked the year 1609, and it’s an important one for us to remember today. At the same time as the events I've mentioned—key moments in history, dates of empires, the starting point for some of the greatest political, social, and moral revolutions in our history—an Italian astronomer, who had heard about the magnifying glasses made in Holland that could make distant objects appear closer, seized the idea, built a telescope, and pointed it at the sky. Yes, my friends, in the same year that Hudson discovered your river and the location of your ancient town, and in which Robinson made his sad journey from Amsterdam to Leyden, Galileo Galilei, with a telescope he crafted himself, discovered the phases of Venus and the moons of Jupiter. Now, after less than two and a half centuries, here we are, gathered in a place that was once surrounded by wilderness—the home of the least civilized of all human races—descendants of the Dutch settlers, descendants of the Pilgrims, in this ancient and thriving city, to inaugurate the establishment of a first-class astronomical observatory.
EARLY DAYS OF ALBANY.
Early days of Albany.
One more glance at your early history. Three years after the landing of the Pilgrims at Plymouth, Fort Orange was erected, in the center of what is now the business part of the city of Albany; and, a few years later, the little hamlet of Beverswyck began to nestle under its walls. Two centuries ago, my Albanian friends, this very year, and I believe this very month of August, your forefathers assembled, not to inaugurate an observatory, but to lay the foundations of a new church, in the place of the rude cabin which had hitherto served them in that capacity. It was built at the intersection [16]of Yonker's and Handelaar's, better known to you as State and Market streets. Public and private liberality coöperated in the important work. The authorities at the Fort gave fifteen hundred guilders; the patroon of that early day, with the liberality coëval with the name and the race, contributed a thousand; while the inhabitants, for whose benefit it was erected, whose numbers were small and their resources smaller, contributed twenty beavers "for the purchase of an oaken pulpit in Holland." Whether the largest part of this subscription was bestowed by some liberal benefactress, tradition has not informed us.
One last look at your early history. Three years after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth, Fort Orange was built in the center of what is now the business district of Albany; and a few years later, the small settlement of Beverswyck began to grow underneath its walls. Two centuries ago, my Albanian friends, this very year, and I believe this very month of August, your ancestors came together, not to open an observatory, but to lay the foundations of a new church, replacing the simple cabin that had served that purpose until then. It was constructed at the intersection [16]of Yonker's and Handelaar's, better known to you as State and Market streets. Public and private generosity worked together on this important project. The authorities at the Fort provided fifteen hundred guilders; the patroon of that time, with a generosity fitting to the name and the race, contributed a thousand; while the residents, for whom it was built, whose numbers were small and resources even smaller, gave twenty beavers "for the purchase of an oaken pulpit in Holland." Whether the largest part of this donation came from some generous benefactress, tradition has not told us.
NEW AMSTERDAM
New York City
Nor is the year 1656 memorable in the annals of Albany alone. In that same year your imperial metropolis, then numbering about three hundred inhabitants, was first laid out as a city, by the name of New Amsterdam.[A] In eight years more, New Netherland becomes New York; Fort Orange and its dependent hamlet assumes the name of Albany. A century of various fortune succeeds; the scourge of French and Indian war is rarely absent from the land; every shock of European policy vibrates with electric rapidity across the Atlantic; but the year 1756 finds a population of 300,000 in your growing province. Albany, however, may still be regarded almost as a frontier settlement. Of the twelve counties into which the province was divided a hundred years ago, the county of Albany comprehended all that lay north and west of the city; and the city itself contained but about three hundred and fifty houses.
Nor is the year 1656 significant in the history of Albany alone. That same year, your great city, then with about three hundred residents, was first established as New Amsterdam.[A] Eight years later, New Netherland becomes New York; Fort Orange and its nearby village take on the name Albany. A century of ups and downs follows; the threat of the French and Indian War is rarely absent from the land; every change in European politics quickly ripples across the Atlantic. By 1756, your expanding province has a population of 300,000. However, Albany can still be seen as almost a frontier settlement. Of the twelve counties the province was divided into a hundred years ago, Albany County included everything north and west of the city, and the city itself held only about three hundred and fifty houses.
TWO HUNDRED YEARS.
TWO HUNDRED YEARS.
One more century; another act in the great drama of empire; another French and Indian War beneath the banners of England; a successful Revolution, of which some of the most momentous events occurred within your limits; a union of States; a Constitution of Federal Government; your population carried to the St. Lawrence and the great Lakes, and their waters poured into the Hudson; your territory covered with a net-work of canals and railroads, filled with life and action, and power, with all the works of peaceful art and prosperous enterprise with all the institutions which constitute and advance the civilization of the age; its population exceeding that of the Union at the date of the Revolution; your own numbers twice as large as those of the largest city of that day, you have met together, my Friends, just two hundred years since the erection of the little church of Beverswyck, to dedicate a noble temple of science and to take a becoming public notice of the establishment of an institution, destined, as we trust, to exert a beneficial influence on the progress of useful knowledge at home and abroad, and through that on the general cause of civilization.
One more century; another act in the great drama of empire; another French and Indian War under the flags of England; a successful Revolution, with some of the most significant events happening right here; a union of States; a Constitution for Federal Government; your population spreading to the St. Lawrence and the Great Lakes, with their waters flowing into the Hudson; your territory covered with a network of canals and railroads, alive with activity and power, filled with all the works of peaceful art and thriving enterprise, alongside all the institutions that make up and enhance the civilization of our time; its population surpassing that of the Union at the time of the Revolution; your own population being twice the size of the largest city back then. You have gathered together, my Friends, just two hundred years after the building of the little church of Beverswyck, to dedicate a great temple of science and to publicly acknowledge the establishment of an institution that we hope will have a positive impact on the advancement of useful knowledge both at home and abroad, and through that, on the overall progress of civilization.
SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS.
Scientific Advancements.
You will observe that I am careful to say the progress of science "at home and abroad;" for the study of Astronomy in this country has long since, I am happy to add, passed that point where it is content to repeat the observations and verify the results of European research. It has boldly and successfully entered the field of original investigation, discovery, and speculation; and there is not now a single department of the science in which the names of American observers and mathematicians are not cited by our brethren across the water, side by side with the most eminent of their European contemporaries.
You’ll notice that I make a point of saying the progress of science "at home and abroad;" because the study of Astronomy in this country has happily moved beyond just repeating observations and confirming the results of European research. It has boldly and successfully ventured into original investigation, discovery, and speculation; and now, there isn’t a single area of the science where the names of American observers and mathematicians aren’t mentioned by our counterparts overseas, alongside the most distinguished of their European contemporaries.
This state of things is certainly recent. During the colonial period and in the first generation after the Revolution, no department of science was, for obvious causes, very extensively cultivated in America—astronomy perhaps as much as the kindred branches. The improvement in the quadrant, commonly known as Hadley's, had already been made at Philadelphia by Godfrey, in the early part of the last century; and the beautiful invention of the collimating telescope was made at a later period by Rittenhouse, an astronomer of distinguished repute. The transits of Venus of 1761 and 1769 were observed, and orreries were constructed in different parts of the country; and some respectable scientific essays are contained and valuable observations are recorded in the early volumes of the Transactions of the Philosophical Society, at Philadelphia, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences at Boston and Cambridge. But in the absence of a numerous class of men of science to encourage and aid each other, without observatories and without valuable instruments, little of importance could be expected in the higher walks of astronomical life.
This situation is definitely recent. During the colonial period and in the first generation after the Revolution, no field of science was, for obvious reasons, very widely pursued in America—astronomy perhaps as much as related fields. The advancement of the quadrant, commonly known as Hadley's, had already been achieved in Philadelphia by Godfrey, in the early part of the last century; and the beautiful invention of the collimating telescope was created later by Rittenhouse, a well-known astronomer. The transits of Venus in 1761 and 1769 were observed, and orreries were built in different parts of the country; some respectable scientific essays and valuable observations are documented in the early volumes of the Transactions of the Philosophical Society in Philadelphia and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in Boston and Cambridge. However, without a large community of scientists to support and inspire each other, lacking observatories and valuable instruments, not much significant progress could be expected in the more advanced realms of astronomical study.
AMERICAN OBSERVATIONS.
U.S. Observations.
The greater the credit due for the achievement of an enterprise commenced in the early part of the present century, and which would reflect honor on the science of any country and any age; I mean the translation and commentary on Laplace's Mécanique Celeste, by Bowditch; a work of whose merit I am myself wholly unable to form an opinion, but which I suppose places the learned translator and commentator on a level with the ablest astronomers and geometers of the day. This work may be considered as opening a new era in the history of American science. The country was still almost wholly deficient in instrumental power; but the want was generally felt by men of science, and the public mind in various parts of the country began to be turned towards the means of supplying it. In 1825, President John Quincy Adams brought the subject of a National Observatory before Congress. Political considerations prevented its being favorably entertained at that time; and it was not till 1842, and as an incident of the exploring expedition, that an appropriation was made for a dépôt for the charts and [18]instruments of the Navy. On this modest basis has been reared the National Observatory at Washington; an institution which has already taken and fully sustains an honorable position among the scientific establishments of the age.
The credit for the achievement of a project that began in the early part of this century, which would bring pride to the science of any country and era, goes to Bowditch’s translation and commentary on Laplace's Mécanique Celeste. I can't personally evaluate its merit, but I believe it places the skilled translator and commentator on par with the top astronomers and geometers of the time. This work can be seen as marking the beginning of a new era in the history of American science. The country was still largely lacking in scientific tools, but that gap was widely recognized by scientific minds, and people across the country started to think about how to address it. In 1825, President John Quincy Adams presented the idea of a National Observatory to Congress. Political factors prevented it from being seriously considered then, and it wasn't until 1842, as part of an exploration expedition, that funding was allocated for a storage facility for the Navy's charts and [18] instruments. This modest foundation has led to the establishment of the National Observatory in Washington, which has already earned and maintains a respectable position among the scientific institutions of our time.
Besides the institution at Washington, fifteen or twenty observatories have within the last few years, been established in different parts of the country, some of them on a modest scale, for the gratification of the scientific taste and zeal of individuals, others on a broad foundation of expense and usefulness. In these establishments, public and private, the means are provided for the highest order of astronomical observation, research, and instruction. There is already in the country an amount of instrumental power (to which addition is constantly making), and of mathematical skill on the part of our men of science, adequate to a manly competition with their European contemporaries. The fruits are already before the world, in the triangulation of several of the States, in the great work of the Coast Survey, in the numerous scientific surveys of the interior of the Continent, in the astronomical department of the Exploring Expedition, in the scientific expedition to Chili, in the brilliant hydrographical labors of the Observatory at Washington, in the published observations of Washington and Cambridge, in the Journal conducted by the Nestor of American Science, now in its eighth lustrum; in the Sidereal Messenger, the Astronomical Journal, and the National Ephemeris; in the great chronometrical expeditions to determine the longitude of Cambridge, better ascertained than that of Paris was till within the last year; in the prompt rectification of the errors in the predicted elements of Neptune; in its identification with Lalande's missing star, and in the calculation of its ephemeris; in the discovery of the satellite of Neptune, of the eighth satellite of Saturn, and of the innermost of its rings; in the establishment, both by observation and theory, of the non-solid character of Saturn's rings; in the separation and measurement of many double and triple stars, amenable only to superior instrumental power, in the immense labor already performed in preparing star catalogues, and in numerous accurate observations of standard stars; in the diligent and successful observation of the meteoric showers; in an extensive series of magnetic observations; in the discovery of an asteroid and ten or twelve telescopic comets; in the resolution of nebulæ which had defied every thing in Europe but Lord Rosse's great reflector; in the application of electricity to the measurement of differences in longitude; in the ascertainment of the velocity of the electro-magnetic fluid, and its truly wonderful uses in recording astronomical observations. These are but a portion of the achievements of American astronomical science within fifteen or twenty years, and fully justify the most sanguine anticipations of its further progress.
Besides the institution in Washington, around fifteen or twenty observatories have been established in various parts of the country in recent years. Some of these are small, fueled by the scientific curiosity and dedication of individuals, while others are built on substantial funding and aimed at practical usefulness. These establishments, both public and private, offer the resources for high-level astronomical observation, research, and education. The country already possesses a significant amount of instrumental capability (which is continuously growing) and mathematical expertise from our scientists, allowing for competitive work alongside their European counterparts. The results are evident in the triangulation of several states, the extensive Coast Survey, numerous scientific surveys of the continent's interior, the astronomical work of the Exploring Expedition, the scientific mission to Chile, the impressive hydrographic efforts at the Washington Observatory, published observations from Washington and Cambridge, and the Journal led by the luminary of American Science, now in its eighth decade. There are also the Sidereal Messenger, the Astronomical Journal, and the National Ephemeris; the major chronometrical expeditions to determine Cambridge's longitude, known to be better established than Paris’s until just last year; the quick correction of errors in Neptune's predicted elements; its identification with Lalande's elusive star; the calculation of its ephemeris; the discovery of Neptune's moon, Saturn's eighth moon, and its innermost ring; the confirmation, through observation and theory, that Saturn's rings are not solid; the separation and measurement of many double and triple stars, possible only with superior instruments; the substantial work in star cataloging; numerous precise observations of standard stars; diligent and fruitful observations of meteor showers; a broad series of magnetic observations; the discovery of an asteroid and around ten or twelve telescopic comets; the resolution of nebulas that had previously resisted all European efforts except for Lord Rosse's giant reflector; the use of electricity to measure longitude differences; the determining of the velocity of the electromagnetic fluid and its remarkable applications in recording astronomical observations. These accomplishments reflect just a fraction of American astronomical science’s progress over the last fifteen to twenty years and strongly validate optimistic expectations for its future development.
How far our astronomers may be able to pursue their researches, will depend upon the resources of our public institutions, and the liberality of wealthy individuals in furnishing the requisite means. With the exception of the observatories at Washington and West Point, little can be done, or be [19]expected to be done, by the government of the Union or the States; but in this, as in every other department of liberal art and science, the great dependence,—and may I not add, the safe dependence?—as it ever has been, must continue to be upon the bounty of enlightened, liberal, and public-spirited individuals.
How far our astronomers can take their research will depend on the resources of our public institutions and the generosity of wealthy individuals providing the necessary funding. Except for the observatories in Washington and West Point, not much can be done or expected from the government at the federal or state level; however, in this area, just like in every other field of art and science, the major reliance—and may I add, the reliable dependence?—as it always has been, will continue to be on the support of educated, generous, and civic-minded individuals.
THE DUDLEY OBSERVATORY.
Dudley Observatory.
It is by a signal exercise of this bounty, my Friends, that we are called together to-day. The munificence of several citizens of this ancient city, among whom the first place is due to the generous lady whose name has with great propriety been given to the institution, has furnished the means for the foundation of the Dudley Observatory at Albany. On a commanding elevation on the northern edge of the city, liberally given for that purpose by the head of a family in which the patronage of science is hereditary, a building of ample dimensions has been erected, upon a plan which combines all the requisites of solidity, convenience, and taste. A large portion of the expense of the structure has been defrayed by Mrs. Blandina Dudley; to whose generosity, and that of several other public-spirited individuals, the institution is also indebted for the provision which has been made for an adequate supply of first-class instruments, to be executed by the most eminent makers in Europe and America; and which, it is confidently expected, will yield to none of their class in any observatory in the world.[A]
It is through a significant act of generosity, my Friends, that we are gathered here today. The generosity of several citizens from this historic city, particularly the remarkable lady whose name has rightfully been given to this institution, has provided the resources necessary for establishing the Dudley Observatory in Albany. Situated on a high point on the northern edge of the city, generously donated for this purpose by the head of a family known for its support of science, a substantial building has been constructed, designed to include all the essential elements of strength, functionality, and style. A large part of the costs for this structure has been covered by Mrs. Blandina Dudley, whose generosity, along with that of other community-minded individuals, has ensured that we will have a sufficient supply of top-quality instruments, crafted by the leading manufacturers in Europe and America; and it is confidently anticipated that these instruments will stand out among their peers in any observatory worldwide.[A]
With a liberal supply of instrumental power; established in a community to whose intelligence and generosity its support may be safely confided, and whose educational institutions are rapidly realizing the conception of a university; countenanced by the gentleman who conducts the United States Coast Survey with such scientific skill and administrative energy; committed to the immediate supervision of an astronomer to whose distinguished talent had been added the advantage of a thorough scientific education in the most renowned universities of Europe, and who, as the editor of the American Astronomical Journal, has shown himself to be fully qualified for the high trust;—under these favorable circumstances, the Dudley Observatory at Albany takes its place among the scientific foundations of the country and the world.
With ample instrumental power, established in a community whose intelligence and generosity can be trusted to support it, and where educational institutions are quickly developing the idea of a university; backed by the gentleman who leads the United States Coast Survey with exceptional scientific skill and administrative effectiveness; overseen by an astronomer whose notable talent is complemented by a comprehensive scientific education from the most prestigious universities in Europe, and who, as the editor of the American Astronomical Journal, has proven himself fully qualified for this important role;—under these beneficial circumstances, the Dudley Observatory in Albany takes its place among the scientific institutions of the country and the world.
WONDERS OF ASTRONOMY.
Wonders of Astronomy.
It is no affected modesty which leads me to express the regret that this interesting occasion could not have taken place under somewhat different auspices. I feel that the duty of addressing this great and enlightened assembly, comprising so much of the intelligence of the community and of the science of the country, ought to have been elsewhere assigned; that it should have devolved upon some one of the eminent persons, many of whom I see before me, to whom you have been listening the past week, who, as observers [20]and geometers, could have treated the subject with a master's power; astronomers, whose telescopes have penetrated the depths of the heavens, or mathematicians, whose analysis unthreads the maze of their wondrous mechanism. If, instead of commanding, as you easily could have done, qualifications of this kind, your choice has rather fallen on one making no pretensions to the honorable name of a man of science,—but whose delight it has always been to turn aside from the dusty paths of active life, for an interval of recreation in the green fields of sacred nature in all her kingdoms,—it is, I presume, because you have desired on an occasion of this kind, necessarily of a popular character, that those views of the subject should be presented which address themselves to the general intelligence of the community, and not to its select scientific circles. There is, perhaps, no branch of science which to the same extent as astronomy exhibits phenomena which, while they task the highest powers of philosophical research, are also well adapted to arrest the attention of minds barely tinctured with scientific culture, and even to teach the sensibilities of the wholly uninstructed observer. The profound investigations of the chemist into the ultimate constitution of material nature, the minute researches of the physiologist into the secrets of animal life, the transcendental logic of the geometer, clothed in a notation, the very sight of which terrifies the uninitiated,—are lost on the common understanding. But the unspeakable glories of the rising and the setting sun; the serene majesty of the moon, as she walks in full-orbed brightness through the heavens; the soft witchery of the morning and the evening star; the imperial splendors of the firmament on a bright, unclouded night; the comet, whose streaming banner floats over half the sky,—these are objects which charm and astonish alike the philosopher and the peasant, the mathematician who weighs the masses and defines the orbits of the heavenly bodies, and the untutored observer who sees nothing beyond the images painted upon the eye.
It’s not false modesty that makes me say how sorry I am that this fascinating event couldn’t have happened under different circumstances. I believe the responsibility of speaking to this great and enlightened group, which includes so many intelligent people from the community and the country's scientific field, should have been assigned to someone else. It should have fallen to one of the esteemed individuals I see before me, who you have been listening to over the past week—those who, as observers and geometers, could handle the topic with expert skill; astronomers whose telescopes have explored the far reaches of the universe, or mathematicians who untangle the complexities of its incredible mechanisms. If, instead of choosing someone with these kinds of qualifications—someone who truly deserves the title of scientist—you’ve opted for someone like me, who doesn’t claim to be a person of science but who enjoys stepping away from the daily grind for a bit of fun in the beautiful realms of nature in all its forms, it’s probably because you wanted, on an occasion like this, which is meant for the public, to hear perspectives that engage the general understanding of the community rather than just the specialized scientific circles. There might be no field of science that, like astronomy, shows us phenomena that not only challenge the highest levels of philosophical inquiry but are also captivating enough to grab the attention of those with only a basic understanding of science, and even to enlighten those who know nothing about it. The deep studies of chemists looking into the fundamental structure of material nature, the detailed investigations of physiologists into the mysteries of life, the complex logic of geometers presented in a notation that intimidates the inexperienced—these are lost on the general public. But the indescribable beauty of the rising and setting sun; the serene majesty of the moon as it shines brightly through the night sky; the soft charm of the morning and evening stars; the breathtaking wonders of the heavens on a clear night; the comet, trailing its glowing tail across the sky—these are the things that captivate and amaze both the philosopher and the farmer, the mathematician who calculates the masses and determines the paths of celestial bodies, and the everyday observer who sees only the images reflected in their eyes.
WHAT IS AN ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY?
WHAT IS AN ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY?
An astronomical observatory, in the general acceptation of the word, is a building erected for the reception and appropriate use of astronomical instruments, and the accommodation of the men of science employed in making and reducing observations of the heavenly bodies. These instruments are mainly of three classes, to which I believe all others of a strictly astronomical character may be referred.
An astronomical observatory, in the broad sense of the term, is a building designed to house and effectively use astronomical instruments, as well as to provide space for scientists working on observing and analyzing celestial bodies. These instruments primarily fall into three categories, which I believe encompass all other strictly astronomical types.
1. The instruments by which the heavens are inspected, with a view to discover the existence of those celestial bodies which are not visible to the naked eye (beyond all comparison more numerous than those which are), and the magnitude, shapes, and other sensible qualities, both of those which are and those which are not thus visible to the unaided sight. The instruments of this class are designated by the general name of Telescope, and are of two kinds,—the refracting telescope, which derives its magnifying power [21]from a system of convex lenses; and the reflecting telescope, which receives the image of the heavenly body upon a concave mirror.
1. The tools used to examine the heavens, in order to find celestial bodies that aren't visible to the naked eye (which are far more numerous than those you can see), along with their sizes, shapes, and other observable properties, both for those that are visible and those that aren't. These tools are collectively called telescopes and come in two types: the refracting telescope, which amplifies images using a set of convex lenses; and the reflecting telescope, which captures the image of celestial bodies on a concave mirror.
2d. The second class of instruments consists of those which are designed principally to measure the angular distances of the heavenly bodies from each other, and their time of passing the meridian. The transit instrument, the meridian circle, the mural circle, the heliometer, and the sextant, belong to this class. The brilliant discoveries of astronomy are, for the most part, made with the first class of instruments; its practical results wrought out by the second.
2d. The second category of instruments includes those mainly created to measure the angular distances between celestial bodies and their time of crossing the meridian. The transit instrument, meridian circle, mural circle, heliometer, and sextant are all part of this category. Most of the remarkable discoveries in astronomy are made using the first category of instruments, while the practical outcomes are achieved with the second.
3d. The third class contains the clock, with its subsidiary apparatus, for measuring the time and making its subdivisions with the greatest possible accuracy; indispensable auxiliary of all the instruments, by which the positions and motions of the heavenly bodies are observed, and measured, and recorded.
3d. The third class includes the clock and its related devices for accurately measuring time and its divisions. It's an essential tool for all instruments that observe, measure, and record the positions and movements of celestial bodies.
THE TELESCOPE.
THE TELESCOPE.
The telescope may be likened to a wondrous cyclopean eye, endued with superhuman power, by which the astronomer extends the reach of his vision to the further heavens, and surveys galaxies and universes compared with which the solar system is but an atom floating in the air. The transit may be compared to the measuring rod which he lays from planet to planet, and from star to star, to ascertain and mark off the heavenly spaces, and transfer them to his note-book; the clock is that marvelous apparatus by which he equalizes and divides into nicely measured parts a portion of that unconceived infinity of duration, without beginning and without end, in which all existence floats as on a shoreless and bottomless sea.
The telescope can be seen as a remarkable one-eyed viewer, gifted with extraordinary power, through which the astronomer broadens his perspective to the distant heavens, exploring galaxies and universes that make our solar system seem like just a tiny speck in the vastness. The transit acts like a measuring tool he uses to connect planets and stars, determining and marking out the celestial spaces to jot them down in his notebook; the clock is that incredible device that allows him to break down and divide into precisely measured sections a slice of the unimaginable infinity of time, which has no beginning and no end, in which all existence drifts like it's on a limitless and bottomless sea.
In the contrivance and the execution of these instruments, the utmost stretch of inventive skill and mechanical ingenuity has been put forth. To such perfection have they been carried, that a single second of magnitude or space is rendered a distinctly visible and appreciable quantity. "The arc of a circle," says Sir J. Herschell, "subtended by one second, is less than the 200,000th part of the radius, so that on a circle of six feet in diameter, it would occupy no greater linear extent than 1-5700 part of an inch, a quantity requiring a powerful microscope to be discerned at all."[A] The largest body in our system, the sun, whose real diameter is 882,000 miles, subtends, at a distance of 95,000,000 miles, but an angle of little more than 32; while so admirably are the best instruments constructed, that both in Europe and America a satellite of Neptune, an object of comparatively inconsiderable diameter, has been discovered at a distance of 2,850 millions of miles.
In the design and the execution of these tools, the highest level of creativity and engineering skill has been utilized. They have been perfected to the point where a single second of size or distance is made into a clearly visible and recognizable measure. "The arc of a circle," says Sir J. Herschell, "subtended by one second, is less than the 200,000th part of the radius, so that on a circle of six feet in diameter, it would cover no more linear extent than 1-5700 part of an inch, a size that requires a powerful microscope to be seen at all." [A] The largest body in our solar system, the sun, which has a real diameter of 882,000 miles, subtends, at a distance of 95,000,000 miles, only an angle of a little more than 32; while so wonderfully are the best instruments made that both in Europe and America a moon of Neptune, which has a relatively small diameter, has been found at a distance of 2,850 million miles.
[A] Outlines, § 131.
UTILITY OF ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS.
USE OF ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS.
The object of an observatory, erected and supplied with instruments of this admirable construction, and at proportionate expense, is, as I have [22]already intimated, to provide for an accurate and systematic survey of the heavenly bodies, with a view to a more correct and extensive acquaintance with those already known, and as instrumental power and skill in using it increase, to the discovery of bodies hitherto invisible, and in both classes to the determination of their distances, their relations to each other, and the laws which govern their movements.
The purpose of an observatory, built and equipped with instruments of remarkable design and at a reasonable cost, is, as I have [22]already mentioned, to facilitate an accurate and organized survey of celestial bodies. This aims to deepen our understanding of those we already know, and as our tools and expertise improve, to discover previously unseen bodies. In both cases, the goal is to determine their distances, relationships to one another, and the laws that govern their movements.
Why should we wish to obtain this knowledge? What inducement is there to expend large sums of money in the erection of observatories, and in furnishing them with costly instruments, and in the support of the men of science employed in making, discussing, and recording, for successive generations, those minute observations of the heavenly bodies?
Why should we want to gain this knowledge? What motivation is there to spend large amounts of money on building observatories, equipping them with expensive instruments, and supporting the scientists who make, discuss, and record those detailed observations of celestial bodies for future generations?
In an exclusively scientific treatment of this subject, an inquiry into its utilitarian relations would be superfluous—even wearisome. But on an occasion like the present, you will not, perhaps, think it out of place if I briefly answer the question, What is the use of an observatory, and what benefit may be expected from the operations of such an establishment in a community like ours?
In a purely scientific discussion of this topic, looking into its practical applications would be unnecessary—even tiring. However, on an occasion like this, you might not find it inappropriate if I briefly address the question, What is the purpose of an observatory, and what benefits can we expect from the activities of such an institution in a community like ours?
1. In the first place, then, we derive from the observations of the heavenly bodies which are made at an observatory, our only adequate measures of time, and our only means of comparing the time of one place with the time of another. Our artificial time-keepers—clocks, watches, and chronometers—however ingeniously contrived and admirably fabricated, are but a transcript, so to say, of the celestial motions, and would be of no value without the means of regulating them by observation. It is impossible for them, under any circumstances, to escape the imperfection of all machinery the work of human hands; and the moment we remove with our time-keeper east or west, it fails us. It will keep home time alone, like the fond traveler who leaves his heart behind him. The artificial instrument is of incalculable utility, but must itself be regulated by the eternal clock-work of the skies.
1. First, we derive our best measures of time from observations of celestial bodies made at an observatory, which is also how we compare the time in one location to another. Our artificial time-keepers—clocks, watches, and chronometers—no matter how cleverly designed and beautifully made, are just a reflection of the movements of the heavens and would be useless without observation to regulate them. No matter the situation, they cannot avoid the flaws of all machinery created by humans; the moment we move our time-keeper east or west, it won't work properly. It only keeps local time, just like a traveler who leaves their heart behind. While the artificial instrument is incredibly useful, it must be adjusted by the timeless mechanics of the skies.
RELATIONS BETWEEN NATURAL PHENOMENA AND DAILY LIFE.
RELATIONS BETWEEN NATURAL PHENOMENA AND DAILY LIFE.
This single consideration is sufficient to show how completely the daily business of life is affected and controlled by the heavenly bodies. It is they—and not our main-springs, our expansion balances, and our compensation pendulums—which give us our time. To reverse the line of Pope:
This one point is enough to show how much the daily routine of life is influenced and governed by the celestial bodies. It's them—and not our driving forces, our expansion balances, and our compensation pendulums—that determine our time. To flip Pope’s line:
"'Tis with our watches as our judgments;—none |
Go just alike, but each believes his own." |
But for all the kindreds and tribes and tongues of men—each upon their own meridian—from the Arctic pole to the equator, from the equator to the Antarctic pole, the eternal sun strikes twelve at noon, and the glorious constellations, far up in the everlasting belfries of the skies, chime twelve at midnight;—twelve for the pale student over his flickering lamp; twelve [23]amid the flaming glories of Orion's belt, if he crosses the meridian at that fated hour; twelve by the weary couch of languishing humanity; twelve in the star-paved courts of the Empyrean; twelve for the heaving tides of the ocean; twelve for the weary arm of labor; twelve for the toiling brain; twelve for the watching, waking, broken heart; twelve for the meteor which blazes for a moment and expires; twelve for the comet whose period is measured by centuries; twelve for every substantial, for every imaginary thing, which exists in the sense, the intellect, or the fancy, and which the speech or thought of man, at the given meridian, refers to the lapse of time.
But for all the families, tribes, and languages of people—each in their own timezone—from the North Pole to the equator, and from the equator to the South Pole, the eternal sun strikes twelve at noon, and the beautiful constellations, high in the endless towers of the sky, chime twelve at midnight;—twelve for the pale student over his flickering lamp; twelve [23] amid the blazing glories of Orion's belt, if he crosses the meridian at that fateful hour; twelve by the weary couch of suffering humanity; twelve in the starry courts of heaven; twelve for the rising tides of the ocean; twelve for the tired arm of labor; twelve for the working mind; twelve for the watching, waking, broken heart; twelve for the meteor that blazes for a moment and then fades; twelve for the comet whose cycle takes centuries; twelve for everything real, for everything imagined, that exists in the senses, the intellect, or the imagination, which human speech or thought, at the given meridian, associates with the passage of time.
Not only do we resort to the observation of the heavenly bodies for the means of regulating and rectifying our clocks, but the great divisions of day and month and year are derived from the same source. By the constitution of our nature, the elements of our existence are closely connected with celestial times. Partly by his physical organization, partly by the experience of the race from the dawn of creation, man as he is, and the times and seasons of the heavenly bodies, are part and parcel of one system. The first great division of time, the day-night (nychthemerum), for which we have no precise synonym in our language, with its primal alternation of waking and sleeping, of labor and rest, is a vital condition of the existence of such a creature as man. The revolution of the year, with its various incidents of summer and winter, and seed-time and harvest, is not less involved in our social, material, and moral progress. It is true that at the poles, and on the equator, the effects of these revolutions are variously modified or wholly disappear; but as the necessary consequence, human life is extinguished at the poles, and on the equator attains only a languid or feverish development. Those latitudes only in which the great motions and cardinal positions of the earth exert a mean influence, exhibit man in the harmonious expansion of his powers. The lunar period, which lies at the foundation of the month, is less vitally connected with human existence and development; but is proved by the experience of every age and race to be eminently conducive to the progress of civilization and culture.
Not only do we look to the observation of celestial bodies to regulate and set our clocks, but the major divisions of the day, month, and year come from the same source. Our nature is inherently linked to celestial cycles. Due to our physical makeup and the shared experiences of humanity since the dawn of time, humans and the cycles of heavenly bodies are part of a unified system. The primary division of time, day and night, which we don't have a precise term for in our language, with its essential shift between wakefulness and sleep, work and rest, is crucial for the survival of human beings. The annual cycle, with its changes from summer to winter, and times for planting and harvest, is equally important for our social, material, and moral growth. It’s true that at the poles and along the equator, the effects of these cycles are significantly altered or completely absent; as a result, life at the poles is non-existent, and at the equator, it only develops in a weak or feverish manner. Only in the latitudes where the major motions and key positions of the earth have a moderate influence do we see humans flourishing in a balanced development of their abilities. The lunar cycle, which is the basis of the month, is less crucial to human life and development; however, evidence from every age and culture shows that it significantly supports the growth of civilization and culture.
But indispensable as are these heavenly measures of time to our life and progress, and obvious as are the phenomena on which they rest, yet owing to the circumstance that, in the economy of nature, the day, the month, and the year are not exactly commensurable, some of the most difficult questions in practical astronomy are those by which an accurate division of time, applicable to the various uses of life, is derived from the observation of the heavenly bodies. I have no doubt that, to the Supreme Intelligence which created and rules the universe, there is a harmony hidden to us in the numerical relation to each other of days, months, and years; but in our ignorance of that harmony, their practical adjustment to each other is a work of difficulty. The great embarrassment which attended the reformation of the calendar, after the error of the Julian period had, in the lapse of centuries, reached ten (or rather twelve) days, sufficiently illustrates this [24]remark. It is most true that scientific difficulties did not form the chief obstacle. Having been proposed under the auspices of the Roman pontiff, the Protestant world, for a century and more, rejected the new style. It was in various places the subject of controversy, collision, and bloodshed.[A] It was not adopted in England till nearly two centuries after its introduction at Rome; and in the country of Struve and the Pulkova equatorial, they persist at the present day in adding eleven minutes and twelve seconds to the length of the tropical year.
But as crucial as these heavenly measures of time are to our lives and progress, and as clear as the phenomena they’re based on are, the fact remains that, in the natural world, the day, month, and year aren’t perfectly aligned. This creates some of the toughest challenges in practical astronomy, where accurately dividing time for various purposes in life comes from observing celestial bodies. I have no doubt that to the Supreme Intelligence that created and governs the universe, there’s a hidden harmony in the numerical relationships among days, months, and years; but in our ignorance of that harmony, figuring out the practical adjustments is quite challenging. The significant problems that arose with the reform of the calendar, after the Julian system’s error accumulated to ten (or really twelve) days over centuries, clearly illustrate this point. It’s certainly true that scientific challenges weren’t the main barrier. Though proposed under the guidance of the Roman pope, the Protestant world rejected the new calendar for over a century. It was a topic of controversy, conflict, and even violence in various places. In England, it wasn't adopted until nearly two centuries after it was introduced in Rome; and in the regions of Struve and at the Pulkova observatory, they still add eleven minutes and twelve seconds to the length of the tropical year today.
[A] Stern's "Himmelskunde," p. 72.
GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE.
Geography.
2. The second great practical use of an Astronomical Observatory is connected with the science of geography. The first page of the history of our Continent declares this truth. Profound meditation on the sphericity of the earth was one of the main reasons which led Columbus to undertake his momentous voyage; and his thorough acquaintance with the astronomical science of that day was, in his own judgment, what enabled him to overcome the almost innumerable obstacles which attended its prosecution.[A] In return, I find that Copernicus in the very commencement of his immortal work De Revolutionibus Orbium Cœlestium, fol. 2, appeals to the discovery of America as completing the demonstration of the sphericity of the earth. Much of our knowledge of the figure, size, density, and position of the earth, as a member of the solar system, is derived from this science; and it furnishes us the means of performing the most important operations of practical geography. Latitude and longitude, which lie at the basis of all descriptive geography, are determined by observation. No map deserves the name, on which the position of important points has not been astronomically determined. Some even of our most important political and administrative arrangements depend upon the coöperation of this science. Among these I may mention the land system of the United States, and the determination of the boundaries of the country. I believe that till it was done by the Federal Government, a uniform system of mathematical survey had never in any country been applied to an extensive territory. Large grants and sales of public land took place before the Revolution, and in the interval between the peace and the adoption of the Constitution; but the limits of these grants and sales were ascertained by sensible objects, by trees, streams, rocks, hills, and by reference to adjacent portions of territory, previously surveyed. The uncertainty of boundaries thus defined, was a never-failing source of litigation. Large tracts of land in the Western country, granted by Virginia under this old system of special and local survey, were covered with conflicting claims; and the controversies to which they gave rise formed no small part of the business of the Federal Court after its organization. But the adoption of the present land-system brought order out of chaos. The entire public domain is now scientifically[25] surveyed before it is offered for sale; it is laid off into ranges, townships, sections, and smaller divisions, with unerring accuracy, resting on the foundation of base and meridian lines; and I have been informed that under this system, scarce a case of contested location and boundary has ever presented itself in court. The General Land Office contains maps and plans, in which every quarter-section of the public land is laid down with mathematical precision. The superficies of half a continent is thus transferred in miniature to the bureaus of Washington; while the local Land Offices contain transcripts of these plans, copies of which are furnished to the individual purchaser. When we consider the tide of population annually flowing into the public domain, and the immense importance of its efficient and economical administration, the utility of this application of Astronomy will be duly estimated.
2. The second major practical use of an Astronomical Observatory is linked to the science of geography. The earliest pages of our Continent's history reveal this truth. Deep thinking about the Earth's round shape was one of the key reasons Columbus embarked on his historic voyage, and he believed that his solid knowledge of the astronomical science of his time helped him overcome the countless challenges he faced. In return, I note that Copernicus, at the very beginning of his famous work De Revolutionibus Orbium Cœlestium, fol. 2, references the discovery of America as confirming the proof of the Earth's sphericity. Much of what we know about the Earth's shape, size, density, and position in the solar system comes from this science; it also provides us with the tools for carrying out crucial tasks in practical geography. Latitude and longitude, which are foundational to all descriptive geography, are determined by observation. No map can truly be called a map if the positions of important points haven't been determined astronomically. Some of our most significant political and administrative decisions rely on this science. Among these, I can mention the land system of the United States and the setting of the country's boundaries. I believe that before the Federal Government established it, no uniform system of mathematical surveying had been applied to a large territory in any country. Significant grants and sales of public land took place before the Revolution and in the time between the peace and the adoption of the Constitution, but the boundaries of these grants and sales were defined by visible landmarks like trees, streams, rocks, and hills, and by referencing nearby surveyed areas. The uncertainty of such boundaries was a constant source of legal disputes. Large areas of land in the Western region, granted by Virginia under this old system of specific and local surveys, were plagued by conflicting claims, and these disputes made up a considerable portion of the Federal Court's workload after it was established. However, the introduction of the current land system brought order to the chaos. Now, the entire public domain is scientifically surveyed before being put up for sale; it's divided into ranges, townships, sections, and smaller units with precise accuracy, based on base and meridian lines; and I've been told that under this system, hardly any cases of disputed locations and boundaries have ever gone to court. The General Land Office has maps and plans showing every quarter-section of public land laid out with mathematical precision. The surface area of half a continent is thus represented in miniature at the offices in Washington, while local Land Offices keep transcripts of these plans, copies of which are provided to individual buyers. Considering the constant flow of population into the public domain and the vital importance of efficiently and effectively managing it, the usefulness of this application of Astronomy becomes clear.
I will here venture to repeat an anecdote, which I heard lately from a son of the late Hon. Timothy Pickering. Mr. Octavius Pickering, on behalf of his father, had applied to Mr. David Putnam of Marietta, to act as his legal adviser, with respect to certain land claims in the Virginia Military district, in the State of Ohio. Mr. Putnam declined the agency. He had had much to do with business of that kind, and found it beset with endless litigation. "I have never," he added, "succeeded but in a single case, and that was a location and survey made by General Washington before the Revolution; and I am not acquainted with any surveys, except those made by him, but what have been litigated."
I’d like to share a story I recently heard from a son of the late Hon. Timothy Pickering. Mr. Octavius Pickering, representing his father, approached Mr. David Putnam of Marietta to be his legal advisor regarding some land claims in the Virginia Military district in Ohio. Mr. Putnam turned down the offer. He had dealt with similar issues before and found them full of endless lawsuits. "I’ve only succeeded in one case," he said, "and that was a location and survey done by General Washington before the Revolution; I don’t know of any surveys except his that haven’t ended up in court."
At this moment, a most important survey of the coast of the United States is in progress, an operation of the utmost consequence, in reference to the commerce, navigation, and hydrography of the country. The entire work, I need scarce say, is one of practical astronomy. The scientific establishment which we this day inaugurate is looked to for important coöperation in this great undertaking, and will no doubt contribute efficiently to its prosecution.
At this moment, a crucial survey of the coast of the United States is taking place, an operation of great importance for the country's commerce, navigation, and hydrography. The whole project, I hardly need to mention, is a matter of practical astronomy. The scientific establishment that we are inaugurating today is expected to provide significant support for this important endeavor and will certainly contribute effectively to its execution.
Astronomical observation furnishes by far the best means of defining the boundaries of States, especially when the lines are of great length and run through unsettled countries. Natural indications, like rivers and mountains, however indistinct in appearance, are in practice subject to unavoidable error. By the treaty of 1783, a boundary was established between the United States and Great Britain, depending chiefly on the course of rivers and highlands dividing the waters which flow into the Atlantic Ocean from those which flow into the St. Lawrence. It took twenty years to find out which river was the true St. Croix, that being the starting point. England then having made the extraordinary discovery that the Bay of Fundy is not a part of the Atlantic Ocean, forty years more were passed in the unsuccessful attempt to re-create the highlands which this strange theory had annihilated; and just as the two countries were on the verge of a war, the controversy was settled by compromise. Had the boundary been accurately [26]described by lines of latitude and longitude, no dispute could have arisen. No dispute arose as to the boundary between the United States and Spain, and her successor, Mexico, where it runs through untrodden deserts and over pathless mountains along the 42d degree of latitude. The identity of rivers may be disputed, as in the case of the St. Croix; the course of mountain chains is too broad for a dividing line; the division of streams, as experience has shown, is uncertain; but a degree of latitude is written on the heavenly sphere, and nothing but an observation is required to read the record.
Astronomical observation provides the best way to define state boundaries, especially when the lines are long and run through unsettled areas. Natural features like rivers and mountains, no matter how vague they may seem, are prone to unavoidable mistakes. By the treaty of 1783, a boundary was set between the United States and Great Britain, mainly based on the courses of rivers and highlands that separate the waters flowing into the Atlantic Ocean from those flowing into the St. Lawrence. It took twenty years to determine which river was the true St. Croix, which was the starting point. England then made the surprising claim that the Bay of Fundy is not part of the Atlantic Ocean, leading to another forty years of failed attempts to redefine the highlands that this strange theory had erased. Just when the two countries were on the brink of war, the issue was resolved through compromise. If the boundary had been accurately described using lines of latitude and longitude, there would have been no dispute. No issues arose regarding the boundary between the United States and Spain, and later Mexico, which runs through uncharted deserts and over pathless mountains along the 42nd degree of latitude. While the identities of rivers can be disputed, as seen with the St. Croix, the paths of mountain ranges are too broad to serve as clear dividing lines, and dividing rivers has proven uncertain. However, a degree of latitude is marked in the sky, and observing it is all that's needed to read the record.
QUESTIONS OF BOUNDARY.
BOUNDARY QUESTIONS.
But scientific elements, like sharp instruments, must be handled with scientific accuracy. A part of our boundary between the British Provinces ran upon the forty-fifth degree of latitude; and about forty years ago, an expensive fortress was commenced by the government of the United States, at Rouse's Point, on Lake Champlain, on a spot intended to be just within our limits. When a line came to be more carefully surveyed, the fortress turned out to be on the wrong side of the line; we had been building an expensive fortification for our neighbor. But in the general compromises of the Treaty of Washington by the Webster and Ashburton Treaty in 1842, the fortification was left within our limits.[A]
But scientific things, like sharp tools, need to be handled with precision. Part of our boundary between the British Provinces followed the forty-fifth degree of latitude; about forty years ago, the U.S. government started building an expensive fortress at Rouse's Point on Lake Champlain, in a location meant to be just within our borders. When the line was surveyed more carefully, it turned out the fortress was on the wrong side of the line—we had been constructing an expensive fort for our neighbor. However, in the overall compromises of the Treaty of Washington through the Webster and Ashburton Treaty in 1842, the fortification was included within our borders.[A]
Errors still more serious had nearly resulted, a few years since, in a war with Mexico. By the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, in 1848, the boundary line between the United States and that country was in part described by reference to the town of El Paso, as laid down on a specified map of the United States, of which a copy was appended to the treaty. This boundary was to be surveyed and run by a joint commission of men of science. It soon appeared that errors of two or three degrees existed in the projection of the map. Its lines of latitude and longitude did not conform to the topography of the region; so that it became impossible to execute the text of the treaty. The famous Mesilla Valley was a part of the debatable ground; and the sum of $10,000,000, paid to the Mexican Government for that and for an additional strip of territory on the southwest, was the smart-money which expiated the inaccuracy of the map—the necessary result, perhaps, of the want of good materials for its construction.
More serious errors nearly led to a war with Mexico several years ago. According to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, the boundary between the United States and Mexico was partially defined by reference to the town of El Paso, based on a specific map of the United States, which was attached to the treaty. This boundary was to be surveyed and established by a joint commission of scientists. It quickly became clear that there were errors of two or three degrees in the map's projection. Its lines of latitude and longitude didn't match the area's topography, making it impossible to execute the treaty as written. The well-known Mesilla Valley was part of the disputed territory, and the $10 million paid to the Mexican government for that land and an additional strip of territory in the southwest was the compensation for the map's inaccuracies—likely a result of not having good materials for its creation.
It became my official duty in London, a few years ago, to apply to the British Government for an authentic statement of their claim to jurisdiction over New Zealand. The official Gazette for the 2d of October, 1840, was sent me from the Foreign Office, as affording the desired information. This number of the Gazette contained the proclamations issued by the Lieutenant Governor of New Zealand, "in pursuance of the instructions he received from the Marquis of Normanby, one of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of [27]State," asserting the jurisdiction of his government over the islands of New Zealand, and declaring them to extend "from 34° 30' North to 47° 10' South latitude." It is scarcely necessary to say that south latitude was intended in both instances. This error of 69° of latitude, which would have extended the claim of British jurisdiction over the whole breadth of the Pacific, had, apparently, escaped the notice of that government.
It became my official responsibility in London, a few years back, to request from the British Government an official statement of their claim to authority over New Zealand. The official Gazette for October 2, 1840, was sent to me from the Foreign Office, providing the information I needed. This issue of the Gazette included the proclamations issued by the Lieutenant Governor of New Zealand, "in accordance with the instructions he received from the Marquis of Normanby, one of Her Majesty's principal Secretaries of State," asserting his government's jurisdiction over the islands of New Zealand and declaring it to extend "from 34° 30' North to 47° 10' South latitude." It’s hardly necessary to mention that south latitude was meant in both cases. This mistake of 69° of latitude, which would have allowed British jurisdiction to lay claim to the entire width of the Pacific, seems to have gone unnoticed by that government.
COMMERCE AND NAVIGATION.
Business and shipping.
It would be easy to multiply illustrations in proof of the great practical importance of accurate scientific designations, drawn from astronomical observations, in various relations connected with boundaries, surveys, and other geographical purposes; but I must hasten to
It would be easy to add more examples to demonstrate the significant practical importance of precise scientific names derived from astronomical observations, in various contexts related to borders, surveys, and other geographical purposes; but I must hurry to
3. A third important department, in which the services rendered by astronomy are equally conspicuous. I refer to commerce and navigation. It is mainly owing to the results of astronomical observation, that modern commerce has attained such a vast expansion, compared with that of the ancient world. I have already reminded you that accurate ideas in this respect contributed materially to the conception in the mind of Columbus of his immortal enterprise, and to the practical success with which it was conducted. It was mainly his skill in the use of astronomical instruments—imperfect as they were—which enabled him, in spite of the bewildering variation of the compass, to find his way across the ocean.
3. A third important area where the contributions of astronomy are clearly evident is in commerce and navigation. It’s largely due to the results of astronomical observations that modern commerce has expanded so significantly compared to the ancient world. I’ve already pointed out that accurate knowledge in this regard played a crucial role in Columbus's legendary voyage and the success he achieved. It was primarily his skill in using astronomical instruments—though they were not perfect—that allowed him to navigate across the ocean, despite the confusing variations of the compass.
With the progress of the true system of the universe toward general adoption, the problem of finding the longitude at sea presented itself. This was the avowed object of the foundation of the observatory at Greenwich;[A] and no one subject has received more of the attention of astronomers, than those investigations of the lunar theory on which the requisite tables of the navigator are founded. The pathways of the ocean are marked out in the sky above. The eternal lights of the heavens are the only Pharos whose beams never fail, which no tempest can shake from its foundation. Within my recollection, it was deemed a necessary qualification for the master and the mate of a merchant-ship, and even for a prime hand, to be able to "work a lunar," as it was called. The improvements in the chronometer have in practice, to a great extent, superseded this laborious operation; but observation remains, and unquestionably will for ever remain, the only dependence for ascertaining the ship's time and deducting the longitude from the comparison of that time with the chronometer.
With the development of the true system of the universe gaining wider acceptance, the challenge of determining longitude at sea became a primary concern. This was the stated purpose behind establishing the observatory at Greenwich;[A] and no topic has captured more attention from astronomers than the studies of the lunar theory that serve as the basis for the navigator's essential tables. The routes of the ocean are mapped in the sky above. The everlasting lights of the heavens serve as the only guiding beacon that remains reliable, unaffected by storms. In my lifetime, it was considered essential for the captain and first mate of a merchant ship, as well as for skilled crew members, to be able to "work a lunar," as it was known. Advances in chronometer technology have mostly replaced this demanding task in practice; however, observation remains, and undoubtedly will always remain, the sole means of determining the ship's time and calculating the longitude through comparison of that time with the chronometer.
[A] Grant's Physical Astronomy, p. 460.
It may, perhaps, be thought that astronomical science is brought already to such a state of perfection that nothing more is to be desired, or at least that nothing more is attainable, in reference to such practicable applications as I have described. This, however, is an idea which generous minds will reject, in this, as in every other department of human knowledge. In astronomy, as in every thing else, the discoveries already made, theoretical or [28]practical, instead of exhausting the science, or putting a limit to its advancement, do but furnish the means and instruments of further progress. I have no doubt we live on the verge of discoveries and inventions, in every department, as brilliant as any that have ever been made; that there are new truths, new facts, ready to start into recognition on every side; and it seems to me there never was an age, since the dawn of time, when men ought to be less disposed to rest satisfied with the progress already made, than the age in which we live; for there never was an age more distinguished for ingenious research, for novel result, and bold generalization.
It might be thought that astronomy has reached such a level of excellence that there’s nothing more to strive for, or at least nothing more that can be achieved in terms of practical applications I've mentioned. However, this is an idea that open-minded individuals will dismiss, just as they would in any other area of knowledge. In astronomy, like in everything else, the discoveries already made—whether theoretical or practical—don’t exhaust the field or place a limit on its advancement; rather, they provide the tools and means for further progress. I have no doubt that we are on the brink of discoveries and inventions, in every field, as remarkable as any that have ever occurred; that there are new truths and new facts ready to emerge all around us; and it seems to me that there has never been a time, since the beginning of existence, when people should be less inclined to feel satisfied with past progress than in our current age; for never has there been a time more characterized by innovative research, new results, and bold generalizations.
That no further improvement is desirable in the means and methods of ascertaining the ship's place at sea, no one I think will from experience be disposed to assert. The last time I crossed the Atlantic, I walked the quarter-deck with the officer in charge of the noble vessel, on one occasion, when we were driving along before a leading breeze and under a head of steam, beneath a starless sky at midnight, at the rate certainly of ten or eleven miles an hour. There is something sublime, but approaching the terrible, in such a scene;—the rayless gloom, the midnight chill,—the awful swell of the deep,—the dismal moan of the wind through the rigging, the all but volcanic fires within the hold of the ship. I scarce know an occasion in ordinary life in which a reflecting mind feels more keenly its hopeless dependence on irrational forces beyond its own control. I asked my companion how nearly he could determine his ship's place at sea under favorable circumstances. Theoretically, he answered, I think, within a mile;—practically and usually within three or four. My next question was, how near do you think we may be to Cape Race;—that dangerous headland which pushes its iron-bound unlighted bastions from the shore of Newfoundland far into the Atlantic,—first landfall to the homeward-bound American vessel. We must, said he, by our last observations and reckoning, be within three or four miles of Cape Race. A comparison of these two remarks, under the circumstances in which we were placed at the moment, brought my mind to the conclusion, that it is greatly to be wished that the means should be discovered of finding the ship's place more accurately, or that navigators would give Cape Race a little wider berth. But I do not remember that one of the steam packets between England and America was ever lost on that formidable point.
No one, I think, would argue that we don't need to improve how we find a ship's location at sea based on experience. The last time I crossed the Atlantic, I walked the deck with the officer in charge of the ship. At one point, we were moving fast with a good wind and added steam, beneath a starless sky at midnight, probably traveling at ten or eleven miles an hour. There’s something both awe-inspiring and a bit terrifying about such a scene—the pitch-black darkness, the chilly night air, the deep ocean's swell, the eerie sound of the wind in the rigging, and the almost volcanic heat coming from the ship's hold. I can hardly think of a moment in everyday life when a reflective mind feels more acutely its complete dependence on uncontrollable forces. I asked my companion how accurately he could determine the ship's location at sea in good conditions. Theoretically, he said, within a mile; practically, usually within three or four. My next question was how close we might be to Cape Race, that dangerous headland that juts out from Newfoundland into the Atlantic—it's the first sight of land for ships heading back to America. He replied that, based on our last observations and calculations, we must be about three or four miles from Cape Race. Comparing those two remarks, given our situation at the moment, led me to conclude that we really should find a better way to locate the ship more precisely or that navigators should give Cape Race a wider berth. However, I don't recall any of the steam packets between England and America ever being lost on that treacherous point.
It appears to me by no means unlikely that, with the improvement of instrumental power, and of the means of ascertaining the ship's time with exactness, as great an advance beyond the present state of art and science in finding a ship's place at sea may take place, as was effected by the invention of the reflecting quadrant, the calculation of lunar tables, and the improved construction of chronometers.
It seems to me quite possible that, with better instruments and more accurate ways to determine a ship's time, we could make as significant a leap in navigating a ship's position at sea as we did with the invention of the reflecting quadrant, the creation of lunar tables, and the advancements in chronometer design.
BABBAGE'S DIFFERENCE MACHINE.
Babbage's Difference Engine.
In the wonderful versatility of the human mind, the improvement, when made, will very probably be made by paths where it is least expected. The [29]great inducement to Mr. Babbage to attempt the construction of an engine by which astronomical tables could be calculated, and even printed, by mechanical means and with entire accuracy, was the errors in the requisite tables. Nineteen such errors, in point of fact, were discovered in an edition of Taylor's Logarithms printed in 1796; some of which might have led to the most dangerous results in calculating a ship's place. These nineteen errors, (of which one only was an error of the press), were pointed out in the Nautical Almanac for 1832. In one of these errata the seat of the error was stated to be in cosine of 14° 18' 3". Subsequent examination showed that there was an error of one second in this correction; and, accordingly, in the Nautical Almanac of the next year a new correction was necessary. But in making the new correction of one second, a new error was committed of ten degrees. Instead of cosine 14° 18' 2" the correction was printed cosine 4° 18' 2" making it still necessary, in some future edition of the Nautical Almanac, to insert an erratum in an erratum of the errata in Taylor's logarithms.[A]
In the amazing flexibility of the human mind, improvements, when they happen, will likely occur in ways that are least expected. The main motivation for Mr. Babbage to try to build a machine that could calculate and even print astronomical tables accurately was the errors found in the necessary tables. In fact, nineteen such errors were discovered in an edition of Taylor's Logarithms printed in 1796; some of these could have resulted in dangerous mistakes when determining a ship's location. These nineteen errors, of which only one was a printing mistake, were highlighted in the Nautical Almanac for 1832. One of these errata indicated that the error was in the cosine of 14° 18' 3". Further examination revealed a one-second mistake in this correction; therefore, a new correction was needed in the Nautical Almanac the following year. However, in making this new correction of one second, another error of ten degrees occurred. Instead of cosine 14° 18' 2", the correction was printed as cosine 4° 18' 2", making it necessary for some future edition of the Nautical Almanac to include an erratum in an erratum of the errata in Taylor's logarithms.[A]
[A] Edinburgh Review, Vol. LIX., 282.
In the hope of obviating the possibility of such errors, Mr. Babbage projected his calculating, or, as he prefers to call it, his difference machine. Although this extraordinary undertaking has been arrested, in consequence of the enormous expense attending its execution, enough has been achieved to show the mechanical possibility of constructing an engine of this kind, and even one of far higher powers, of which Mr. Babbage has matured the conception, devised the notation, and executed the drawings—themselves an imperishable monument of the genius of the author.
In hopes of preventing such mistakes, Mr. Babbage designed his calculating machine, which he prefers to call his difference engine. Although this incredible project has been halted due to the huge costs involved, enough has been accomplished to demonstrate the mechanical feasibility of building a machine like this, and even one with much greater capabilities, for which Mr. Babbage has developed the concept, created the notation, and completed the drawings—these are a lasting testament to the author's genius.
I happened on one occasion to be in company with this highly distinguished man of science, whose social qualities are as pleasing as his constructive talent is marvelous, when another eminent savant, Count Strzelecki, just returned from his Oriental and Australian tour, observed that he found among the Chinese, a great desire to know something more of Mr. Babbage's calculating machine, and especially whether, like their own swampan, it could be made to go into the pocket. Mr. Babbage good-humouredly observed that, thus far, he had been very much out of pocket with it.
I happened to be in the company of this highly distinguished scientist, whose social skills are as enjoyable as his incredible talent for invention, when another notable expert, Count Strzelecki, who had just returned from his trip to the East and Australia, remarked that he noticed a strong interest among the Chinese in learning more about Mr. Babbage's calculating machine, particularly whether, like their own swampan, it could be made portable. Mr. Babbage lightheartedly replied that, so far, he had been quite out of pocket with it.
INCREASED COMMAND OF INSTRUMENTAL POWER.
Enhanced control of instrumental power.
Whatever advances may be made in astronomical science, theoretical or applied, I am strongly inclined to think that they will be made in connection with an increased command of instrumental power. The natural order in which the human mind proceeds in the acquisition of astronomical knowledge is minute and accurate observation of the phenomena of the heavens, the skillful discussion and analysis of these observations, and sound philosophy in generalizing the results.
No matter how much progress is made in astronomy, whether in theory or practical application, I firmly believe that such advancements will come from better tools and equipment. The way people typically gain astronomical knowledge starts with detailed and precise observations of the sky, followed by skillful discussion and analysis of these observations, and finally sound reasoning to draw broader conclusions from the results.
In pursuing this course, however, a difficulty presented itself, which for ages proved insuperable—and which to the same extent has existed in no other science, viz.: that all the leading phenomena are in their appearance delusive. It is indeed true that in all sciences superficial observation can only lead, except by chance, to superficial knowledge; but I know of no branch in which, to the same degree as in astronomy, the great leading phenomena are the reverse of true; while they yet appeal so strongly to the senses, that men who could foretell eclipses, and who discovered the precession of the equinoxes, still believed that the earth was at rest in the center of the universe, and that all the host of heaven performed a daily revolution about it as a center.
In pursuing this course, however, a challenge arose that has been impossible to overcome for ages—and which doesn't exist to the same extent in any other science: the fact that all the key phenomena are misleading in their appearance. It's true that in all sciences, a shallow look often leads to shallow understanding; however, I don't know of any field where, as much as in astronomy, the major phenomena are completely opposite to reality. Yet, they are so convincing to our senses that people who could predict eclipses and discovered the precession of the equinoxes still believed that the earth was stationary at the center of the universe, and that the entire celestial sphere revolved around it daily as the focal point.
It usually happens in scientific progress, that when a great fact is at length discovered, it approves itself at once to all competent judges. It furnishes a solution to so many problems, and harmonizes with so many other facts,—that all the other data as it were crystallize at once about it. In modern times, we have often witnessed such an impatience, so to say, of great truths, to be discovered, that it has frequently happened that they have been found out simultaneously by more than one individual; and a disputed question of priority is an event of very common occurrence. Not so with the true theory of the heavens. So complete is the deception practiced on the senses, that it failed more than once to yield to the suggestion of the truth; and it was only when the visual organs were armed with an almost preternatural instrumental power, that the great fact found admission to the human mind.
It often happens in scientific progress that when a significant fact is finally discovered, it immediately gains acceptance from all qualified experts. It provides answers to numerous problems and aligns with so many other facts that all the other data seem to crystallize around it. In modern times, we've often seen a kind of eagerness for major truths to be uncovered, resulting in situations where multiple individuals discover them at the same time, leading to frequent disputes over who was first. This wasn’t the case with the true theory of the universe. The deception on the senses was so strong that it resisted the truth for quite some time; it was only when our vision was enhanced with almost supernatural instruments that this great fact was finally understood.
THE COPERNICAN SYSTEM.
The Copernican Model.
It is supposed that in the very dawn of science, Pythagoras or his disciples explained the apparent motion of the heavenly bodies about the earth by the diurnal revolution of the earth on its axis. But this theory, though bearing so deeply impressed upon it the great seal of truth, simplicity, was in such glaring contrast with the evidence of the senses, that it failed of acceptance in antiquity or the middle ages. It found no favor with minds like those of Aristotle, Archimedes, Hipparchus, Ptolemy, or any of the acute and learned Arabian or mediæval astronomers. All their ingenuity and all their mathematical skill were exhausted in the development of a wonderfully complicated and ingenious, but erroneous history. The great master truth, rejected for its simplicity, lay disregarded at their feet.
It is believed that at the very beginning of science, Pythagoras or his followers explained the apparent motion of the stars around the Earth by the Earth's daily rotation on its axis. However, this theory, despite being marked by the profound seal of truth, simplicity, stood in stark contrast to sensory evidence, which led to its rejection in ancient times and throughout the Middle Ages. It did not gain acceptance among thinkers like Aristotle, Archimedes, Hipparchus, Ptolemy, or any of the sharp and learned Arab or medieval astronomers. Their creativity and mathematical skills were completely absorbed in creating a remarkably complex and clever, yet incorrect, narrative. The great fundamental truth, dismissed for its simplicity, lay ignored at their feet.
At the second dawn of science, the great fact again beamed into the mind of Copernicus. Now, at least, in that glorious age which witnessed the invention of printing, the great mechanical engine of intellectual progress, and the discovery of America, we may expect that this long-hidden revelation, a second time proclaimed, will command the assent of mankind. But the sensible phenomena were still too strong for the theory; the glorious delusion of the rising and the setting sun could not be overcome. Tycho de Brahe furnished his Observatory with instruments superior in number and quality to [31]all that had been collected before; but the great instrument of discovery, which, by augmenting the optic power of the eye, enables it to penetrate beyond the apparent phenomena, and to discern the true constitution of the heavenly bodies, was wanting at Uranienburg. The observations of Tycho as discussed by Kepler, conducted that most fervid, powerful, and sagacious mind to the discovery of some of the most important laws of the celestial motions; but it was not till Galileo, at Florence, had pointed his telescope to the sky, that the Copernican system could be said to be firmly established in the scientific world.
At the dawn of modern science, the significant truth once again illuminated the mind of Copernicus. Now, in that glorious era that saw the invention of printing—the remarkable tool for intellectual growth—and the discovery of America, we can hope that this long-hidden truth, proclaimed once more, will gain the acceptance of humanity. However, the observable phenomena were still too convincing for the theory; the beautiful illusion of the sun rising and setting couldn't be overcome. Tycho de Brahe equipped his Observatory with more and better instruments than [31] had ever been gathered before; yet the essential tool for discovery, which enhances the eye's optical power to see beyond surface appearances and understand the true nature of celestial bodies, was missing at Uranienburg. Tycho's observations, analyzed by Kepler, led that passionate, brilliant, and insightful mind to uncover some of the most significant laws of celestial motion; but it wasn't until Galileo, in Florence, aimed his telescope at the sky that the Copernican system could be regarded as firmly established in the scientific community.
THE HOME OF GALILEO.
GALILEO'S HOME.
On this great name, my Friends, assembled as we are to dedicate a temple to instrumental Astronomy, we may well pause for a moment.
On this important occasion, my friends, as we gather to dedicate a temple to instrumental astronomy, we can take a moment to reflect.
There is much, in every way, in the city of Florence to excite the curiosity, to kindle the imagination, and to gratify the taste. Sheltered on the north by the vine-clad hills of Fiesoli, whose cyclopean walls carry back the antiquary to ages before the Roman, before the Etruscan power, the flowery city (Fiorenza) covers the sunny banks of the Arno with its stately palaces. Dark and frowning piles of mediæval structure; a majestic dome, the prototype of St. Peter's; basilicas which enshrine the ashes of some of the mightiest of the dead; the stone where Dante stood to gaze on the Campanile; the house of Michael Angelo, still occupied by a descendant of his lineage and name, his hammer, his chisel, his dividers, his manuscript poems, all as if he had left them but yesterday; airy bridges, which seem not so much to rest on the earth as to hover over the waters they span; the loveliest creations of ancient art, rescued from the grave of ages again to enchant the world; the breathing marbles of Michael Angelo, the glowing canvas of Raphael and Titian, museums filled with medals and coins of every age from Cyrus the younger, and gems and amulets and vases from the sepulchers of Egyptian Pharaohs coëval with Joseph, and Etruscan Lucumons that swayed Italy before the Romans,—libraries stored with the choicest texts of ancient literature,—gardens of rose and orange, and pomegranate, and myrtle,—the very air you breathe languid with music and perfume;—such is Florence. But among all its fascinations, addressed to the sense, the memory, and the heart, there was none to which I more frequently gave a meditative hour during a year's residence, than to the spot where Galileo Galilei sleeps beneath the marble door of Santa Croce; no building on which I gazed with greater reverence, than I did upon the modest mansion at Arcetri, villa at once and prison, in which that venerable sage, by command of the Inquisition, passed the sad closing years of his life. The beloved daughter on whom he had depended to smooth his passage to the grave, laid there before him; the eyes with which he had discovered worlds before unknown, quenched in blindness:
There’s so much in the city of Florence to spark curiosity, ignite imagination, and satisfy taste. Nestled to the north by the vine-covered hills of Fiesole, whose ancient walls take you back to eras before the Romans and Etruscans, the flower-filled city (Fiorenza) stretches over the sunny banks of the Arno with its impressive palaces. Dark and imposing medieval buildings; a grand dome, a model for St. Peter's; basilicas that hold the remains of some of the most powerful figures in history; the stone where Dante stood to admire the Campanile; the house of Michelangelo, still home to a descendant of his family and name, with his hammer, chisel, dividers, and manuscript poems as if he just left them yesterday; elegant bridges that seem to float above the waters they cross; the finest creations of ancient art, revived to mesmerize the world again; Michelangelo's breathing marbles, the vibrant paintings of Raphael and Titian, museums filled with coins and medals from every era, along with gems, amulets, and vases from the tombs of Egyptian Pharaohs from the time of Joseph, and Etruscan leaders who ruled Italy before the Romans—libraries packed with the best texts of ancient literature—gardens filled with roses, oranges, pomegranates, and myrtles—the very air you breathe rich with music and fragrance; such is Florence. But among all its charms, appealing to the senses, memories, and heart, none captured my contemplative hours more during my year there than the place where Galileo Galilei rests beneath the marble door of Santa Croce; no building did I regard with more reverence than the humble home at Arcetri, both a villa and a prison, where that venerable scholar spent the sad final years of his life under the Inquisition's orders. The beloved daughter he relied on to ease his passage to the grave lay there before him; the eyes that had discovered previously unknown worlds were now clouded by blindness:
Ahime! quegli occhi si son fatti oscuri, |
Che vider più di tutti i tempi antichi, |
E luce fur dei secoli futuri. |
That was the house, "where," says Milton (another of those of whom the world was not worthy), "I found and visited the famous Galileo, grown old—a prisoner to the Inquisition, for thinking on astronomy otherwise than as the Dominican and Franciscan licensers thought."[A] Great Heavens! what a tribunal, what a culprit, what a crime! Let us thank God, my Friends, that we live in the nineteenth century. Of all the wonders of ancient and modern art, statues and paintings, and jewels and manuscripts,—the admiration and the delight of ages,—there was nothing which I beheld with more affectionate awe than that poor, rough tube, a few feet in length,—the work of his own hands,—that very "optic glass," through which the "Tuscan Artist" viewed the moon,
That was the house where, as Milton said (another one of those people the world didn't deserve), "I found and visited the famous Galileo, now old—a prisoner of the Inquisition for thinking about astronomy differently than the Dominican and Franciscan censors did." [A] Good heavens! What a tribunal, what a guilty party, what a crime! Let's thank God, my friends, that we live in the nineteenth century. Out of all the wonders of ancient and modern art—statues, paintings, jewels, and manuscripts, which have amazed and delighted people for ages—there was nothing I looked at with more loving awe than that poor, rough tube, a few feet long—the very “optic glass” that the “Tuscan Artist” used to observe the moon.
"At evening, from the top of Fesolé, |
Or in Valdarno, to descry new lands, |
Rivers, or mountains, in her spotty globe." |
that poor little spy-glass (for it is scarcely more) through which the human eye first distinctly beheld the surface of the moon—first discovered the phases of Venus, the satellites of Jupiter, and the seeming handles of Saturn—first penetrated the dusky depths of the heavens—first pierced the clouds of visual error, which, from the creation of the world, involved the system of the Universe.
that poor little telescope (because it’s hardly more) through which the human eye first clearly saw the surface of the moon—first discovered the phases of Venus, the moons of Jupiter, and the apparent rings of Saturn—first explored the shadowy expanse of the sky—first cut through the haze of visual confusion that, from the dawn of time, obscured the workings of the Universe.
There are occasions in life in which a great mind lives years of rapt enjoyment in a moment. I can fancy the emotions of Galileo, when, first raising the newly-constructed telescope to the heavens, he saw fulfilled the grand prophecy of Copernicus, and beheld the planet Venus crescent like the moon. It was such another moment as that when the immortal printers of Mentz and Strasburg received the first copy of the Bible into their hands, the work of their divine art; like that when Columbus, through the gray dawn of the 12th of October, 1492 (Copernicus, at the age of eighteen, was then a student at Cracow), beheld the shores of San Salvador; like that when the law of gravitation first revealed itself to the intellect of Newton; like that when Franklin saw by the stiffening fibers of the hempen cord of his kite, that he held the lightning in his grasp; like that when Leverrier received back from Berlin the tidings that the predicted planet was found.
There are moments in life when a brilliant mind experiences years of pure joy in just an instant. I can imagine Galileo’s feelings when, for the first time, he pointed his newly-made telescope at the sky and saw the great vision of Copernicus come to life, watching the planet Venus appear crescent like the moon. It was a moment similar to when the legendary printers of Mainz and Strasbourg held the first copy of the Bible in their hands, the result of their divine craft; like when Columbus, during the gray dawn of October 12, 1492 (when Copernicus was an eighteen-year-old student in Krakow), caught sight of the shores of San Salvador; like when Newton first grasped the law of gravitation; like when Franklin realized, by the stiffening fibers of the hemp rope of his kite, that he had captured lightning in his hands; like when Leverrier received word back from Berlin that the predicted planet was found.
Yes, noble Galileo, thou art right, E pur si muove. "It does move." Bigots may make thee recant it; but it moves, nevertheless. Yes, the earth moves, and the planets move, and the mighty waters move, and the great sweeping tides of air move, and the empires of men move, and the world of thought moves, ever onward and upward to higher facts and bolder theories. The Inquisition may seal thy lips, but they can no more stop the progress of the great truth propounded by Copernicus, and demonstrated by thee, than they can stop the revolving earth.
Yes, noble Galileo, you are right, And yet it moves. "It does move." Bigots may force you to recant it, but it moves, nonetheless. Yes, the earth moves, and the planets move, and the mighty waters move, and the vast tides of air move, and the empires of men move, and the world of thought moves, always onward and upward to higher truths and bolder theories. The Inquisition may try to silence you, but they can no more halt the progress of the great truth proposed by Copernicus, and demonstrated by you, than they can stop the revolving earth.
Close now, venerable sage, that sightless, tearful eye; it has seen what man never before saw—it has seen enough. Hang up that poor little spy-glass—it has done its work. Not Herschell nor Rosse have, comparatively, [33]done more. Franciscans and Dominicans deride thy discoveries now; but the time will come when, from two hundred observatories in Europe and America, the glorious artillery of science shall nightly assault the skies, but they shall gain no conquests in those glittering fields before which thine shall be forgotten. Rest in peace, great Columbus of the heavens—like him scorned, persecuted, broken-hearted!—in other ages, in distant hemispheres, when the votaries of science, with solemn acts of consecration, shall dedicate their stately edifices to the cause of knowledge and truth, thy name shall be mentioned with honor.
Close now, wise sage, that sightless, tearful eye; it has seen what humanity has never witnessed before—it has seen enough. Put away that poor little telescope—it has done its job. Neither Herschel nor Rosse have, comparatively, [33]achieved more. Franciscans and Dominicans mock your discoveries now; but the time will come when, from two hundred observatories in Europe and America, the powerful tools of science will boldly explore the skies every night, yet they will achieve no victories in those dazzling realms that your discoveries will overshadow. Rest in peace, great Columbus of the heavens—like him, scorned, persecuted, and heartbroken!—in other eras, in distant places, when the followers of science, with formal ceremonies, dedicate their impressive buildings to the pursuit of knowledge and truth, your name will be honored.
NEW PERIODS IN ASTRONOMICAL SCIENCE.
NEW ERA IN ASTRONOMICAL SCIENCE.
It is not my intention, in dwelling with such emphasis upon the invention of the telescope, to ascribe undue importance, in promoting the advancement of science, to the increase of instrumental power. Too much, indeed, cannot be said of the service rendered by its first application in confirming and bringing into general repute the Copernican system; but for a considerable time, little more was effected by the wondrous instrument than the gratification of curiosity and taste, by the inspection of the planetary phases, and the addition of the rings and satellites of Saturn to the solar family. Newton, prematurely despairing of any further improvement in the refracting telescope, applied the principle of reflection; and the nicer observations now made, no doubt, hastened the maturity of his great discovery of the law of gravitation; but that discovery was the work of his transcendent genius and consummate skill.
It’s not my goal in emphasizing the invention of the telescope to give it too much credit in advancing science through increased instrumental power. Certainly, the initial use of the telescope played a significant role in confirming and popularizing the Copernican system; however, for a long time, the amazing instrument did little more than satisfy curiosity and aesthetic appreciation through the observation of planetary phases and by adding the rings and moons of Saturn to our understanding of the solar system. Newton, giving up too soon on improving the refracting telescope, turned to the principle of reflection. The more precise observations made with this method undoubtedly sped up the development of his groundbreaking discovery of the law of gravitation, but that discovery was ultimately the result of his extraordinary genius and exceptional skill.
With Bradley, in 1741, a new period commenced in instrumental astronomy, not so much of discovery as of measurement. The superior accuracy and minuteness with which the motions and distances of the heavenly bodies were now observed, resulted in the accumulation of a mass of new materials, both for tabular comparison and theoretical speculation. These materials formed the enlarged basis of astronomical science between Newton and Sir William Herschell. His gigantic reflectors introduced the astronomer to regions of space before unvisited—extended beyond all previous conception the range of the observed phenomena, and with it proportionably enlarged the range of constructive theory. The discovery of a new primary planet and its attendant satellites was but the first step of his progress into the labyrinth of the heavens. Cotemporaneously with his observations, the French astronomers, and especially La Place, with a geometrical skill scarcely, if at all, inferior to that of its great author, resumed the whole system of Newton, and brought every phenomenon observed since his time within his laws. Difficulties of fact, with which he struggled in vain, gave way to more accurate observations; and problems that defied the power of his analysis, yielded to the modern improvements of the calculus.
With Bradley, in 1741, a new era began in instrumental astronomy, marked not so much by discoveries as by measurements. The greater accuracy and detail with which the motions and distances of celestial bodies were now tracked led to a wealth of new data, both for tabular comparison and theoretical exploration. This data formed a broader foundation for astronomical science between Newton and Sir William Herschel. His massive reflectors opened up regions of space that had never been explored, greatly expanding the range of observed phenomena and consequently enlarging the scope of theoretical development. The discovery of a new primary planet and its moons was just the first step in his journey through the complexities of the cosmos. At the same time, French astronomers, especially La Place, used their geometric skills, which were nearly on par with those of Newton, to revisit Newton's entire system and fit every phenomenon observed since then into his laws. Challenges that Newton struggled to overcome were resolved by more precise observations, and problems that had eluded his analytical methods were addressed by modern advancements in calculus.
HERSCHELL'S NEBULAR THEORY.
Herschel's Nebula Theory.
But there is no Ultima Thule in the progress of science. With the recent augmentations of telescopic power, the details of the nebular theory, proposed by Sir W. Herschell with such courage and ingenuity, have been drawn in question. Many—most—of those milky patches in which he beheld what he regarded as cosmical matter, as yet in an unformed state,—the rudimental material of worlds not yet condensed,—have been resolved into stars, as bright and distinct as any in the firmament. I well recall the glow of satisfaction with which, on the 22d of September, 1847, being then connected with the University at Cambridge, I received a letter from the venerable director of the Observatory there, beginning with these memorable words:—"You will rejoice with me that the great nebula in Orion has yielded to the powers of our incomparable telescope! * * * It should be borne in mind that this nebula, and that of Andromeda [which has been also resolved at Cambridge], are the last strongholds of the nebular theory."[A]
But there’s no Ultima Thule in the progress of science. With the recent enhancements in telescopic power, the details of the nebular theory, proposed by Sir W. Herschell with such courage and ingenuity, have come into question. Many—most—of those milky patches he saw as what he thought was cosmic matter, still unformed—the basic material of worlds not yet formed—have been resolved into stars, as bright and distinct as any in the sky. I vividly remember the satisfaction I felt on September 22, 1847, when I, then affiliated with the University at Cambridge, received a letter from the esteemed director of the Observatory there, starting with these memorable words:—"You will rejoice with me that the great nebula in Orion has yielded to the powers of our incomparable telescope! * * * It should be noted that this nebula, and that of Andromeda [which has also been resolved at Cambridge], are the last strongholds of the nebular theory."[A]
But if some of the adventurous speculations built by Sir William Herschell on the bewildering revelations of his telescope have been since questioned, the vast progress which has been made in sidereal astronomy, to which, as I understand, the Dudley Observatory will be particularly devoted, the discovery of the parallax of the fixed stars, the investigation of the interior relations of binary and triple systems of stars, the theories for the explanation of the extraordinary, not to say fantastic, shapes discerned in some of the nebulous systems—whirls and spirals radiating through spaces as vast as the orbit of Neptune;[A] the glimpses at systems beyond that to which our sun belongs;—these are all splendid results, which may fairly be attributed to the school of Herschell, and will for ever insure no secondary place to that name in the annals of science.
But if some of the adventurous ideas proposed by Sir William Herschel based on the confusing insights from his telescope have been questioned since, the significant advancements in stellar astronomy, to which the Dudley Observatory will be particularly dedicated, the discovery of the parallax of fixed stars, the study of the internal dynamics of binary and triple star systems, the theories explaining the extraordinary, if not fantastic, shapes seen in some nebulae—whirls and spirals extending through spaces as vast as Neptune's orbit;[A] the insights into systems beyond our own solar system;—these are all remarkable outcomes that can fairly be linked to the Herschel legacy and will ensure that his name holds a prominent place in the history of science.
[A] See the remarkable memoir of Professor Alexander, "On the origin of the forms and the present condition of some of the clusters of stars, and several of the nebulæ," (Gould's Astronomical Journal, Vol. iii, p. 95.)
[A] Check out the impressive memoir by Professor Alexander, "On the origin of the forms and the current state of some star clusters and various nebulae," (Gould's Astronomical Journal, Vol. iii, p. 95.)
RELATIONSHIP OF THE LIBERAL ARTS.
LINK BETWEEN THE LIBERAL ARTS.
In the remarks which I have hitherto made, I have had mainly in view the direct connection of astronomical science with the uses of life and the service of man. But a generous philosophy contemplates the subject in higher relations. It is a remark as old, at least, as Plato, and is repeated from him more than once by Cicero, that all the liberal arts have a common bond and relationship.[A] The different sciences contemplate as their immediate object the different departments of animate and inanimate nature; but this great system itself is but one, and its parts are so interwoven with each other, that the most extraordinary relations and unexpected analogies are [35]constantly presenting themselves; and arts and sciences seemingly the least connected, render to each other the most effective assistance.
In the comments I've made so far, I've primarily focused on how astronomy connects directly to everyday life and serves humanity. However, a broader philosophy considers the topic in a more profound way. It's an idea that's been around since Plato's time and has been echoed by Cicero, who noted that all the liberal arts share a common link and connection.[A] Each science looks at different aspects of living and non-living nature as its main focus, but this entire system is essentially one, with its parts intricately intertwined. As a result, we often see remarkable relationships and surprising similarities emerging, and fields of study that seem distant can actually support each other in significant ways.
The history of electricity, galvanism, and magnetism, furnishes the most striking illustration of this remark. Commencing with the meteorological phenomena of our own atmosphere, and terminating with the observation of the remotest heavens, it may well be adduced, on an occasion like the present. Franklin demonstrated the identity of lightning and the electric fluid. This discovery gave a great impulse to electrical research, with little else in view but the means of protection from the thunder-cloud. A purely accidental circumstance led the physician Galvani, at Bologna, to trace the mysterious element, under conditions entirely novel, both of development and application. In this new form it became, in the hands of Davy, the instrument of the most extraordinary chemical operations; and earths and alkalis, touched by the creative wire, started up into metals that float on water, and kindle in the air. At a later period, the closest affinities are observed between electricity and magnetism, on the one hand; while, on the other, the relations of polarity are detected between acids and alkalis. Plating and gilding henceforth become electrical processes. In the last applications of the same subtle medium, it has become the messenger of intelligence across the land and beneath the sea; and is now employed by the astronomer to ascertain the difference of longitudes, to transfer the beats of the clock from one station to another, and to record the moment of his observations with automatic accuracy. How large a share has been borne by America in these magnificent discoveries and applications, among the most brilliant achievements of modern science, will sufficiently appear from the repetition of the names of Franklin, Henry, Morse, Walker, Mitchell, Lock, and Bond.
The history of electricity, galvanism, and magnetism provides a striking example of this point. Starting with the weather phenomena in our atmosphere and ending with observations of the distant heavens, it’s relevant to discuss here. Franklin proved that lightning and electric current are the same. This discovery sparked significant interest in electrical research, mainly for finding ways to protect against thunderstorms. A completely accidental situation led the physician Galvani in Bologna to explore this mysterious force under entirely new conditions, both in how it developed and how it was applied. In this new form, it became, in Davy’s hands, a tool for some of the most extraordinary chemical reactions; substances and alkalis, when touched by the conductive wire, transformed into metals that can float on water and ignite in the air. Later on, strong connections were found between electricity and magnetism, while the relationships of polarity were identified between acids and alkalis. From that point on, plating and gilding became electrical processes. In the latest applications of this intricate medium, it has turned into a messenger of information across land and under the sea; it's now used by astronomers to determine longitude differences, transfer clock beats from one location to another, and precisely record the timing of their observations automatically. The significant contributions made by America to these remarkable discoveries and applications, among the greatest achievements of modern science, are evident from the notable names of Franklin, Henry, Morse, Walker, Mitchell, Lock, and Bond.
VERSATILITY OF GENIUS.
Genius Versatility.
It has sometimes happened, whether from the harmonious relations to each other of every department of science, or from rare felicity of individual genius, that the most extraordinary intellectual versatility has been manifested by the same person. Although Newton's transcendent talent did not blaze out in childhood, yet as a boy he discovered great aptitude for mechanical contrivance. His water-clock, self-moving vehicle, and mill, were the wonder of the village; the latter propelled by a living mouse. Sir David Brewster represents the accounts as differing, whether the mouse was made to advance "by a string attached to its tail," or by "its unavailing attempts to reach a portion of corn placed above the wheel." It seems more reasonable to conclude that the youthful discoverer of the law of gravitation intended by the combination of these opposite attractions to produce a balanced movement. It is consoling to the average mediocrity of the race to perceive in these sportive assays, that the mind of Newton passed through the stage of boyhood. But emerging from boyhood, what a bound it made, as from earth to heaven! [36]Hardly commencing bachelor of arts, at the age of twenty-four, he untwisted the golden and silver threads of the solar spectrum, simultaneously or soon after conceived the method of fluxions, and arrived at the elemental idea of universal gravity before he had passed to his master's degree. Master of Arts indeed! That degree, if no other, was well bestowed. Universities are unjustly accused of fixing science in stereotype. That diploma is enough of itself to redeem the honors of academical parchment from centuries of learned dullness and scholastic dogmatism.
It has occasionally happened, whether due to the harmonious relationships among various areas of science or due to the rare brilliance of individual genius, that the same person has shown remarkable intellectual versatility. Even though Newton's extraordinary talent didn't shine through in his childhood, he showed a strong knack for mechanical inventions as a boy. His water clock, self-propelling vehicle, and mill amazed the villagers; the latter was powered by a living mouse. Sir David Brewster has noted differing accounts about whether the mouse moved "by a string attached to its tail" or through "its futile attempts to reach a piece of corn placed above the wheel." It seems more reasonable to think that the young discoverer of the law of gravitation intended for these opposing attractions to create a balanced movement. It's comforting for the average person to see that even Newton's mind went through the playful experiments of childhood. But once he grew up, what a leap he made, as if rising from earth to heaven! [36] Just starting his bachelor of arts degree at the age of twenty-four, he unraveled the golden and silver threads of the solar spectrum, soon developed the method of calculus, and arrived at the fundamental idea of universal gravity before he even got his master’s degree. Master of Arts indeed! That degree, if nothing else, was well-deserved. Universities are unfairly criticized for making science rigid. That diploma alone is enough to elevate the reputation of academic credentials from centuries of dull learning and rigid dogma.
But the great object of all knowledge is to enlarge and purify the soul, to fill the mind with noble contemplations, to furnish a refined pleasure, and to lead our feeble reason from the works of nature up to its great Author and Sustainer. Considering this as the ultimate end of science, no branch of it can surely claim precedence of Astronomy. No other science furnishes such a palpable embodiment of the abstractions which lie at the foundation of our intellectual system; the great ideas of time, and space, and extension, and magnitude, and number, and motion, and power. How grand the conception of the ages on ages required for several of the secular equations of the solar system; of distances from which the light of a fixed star would not reach us in twenty millions of years, of magnitudes compared with which the earth is but a foot-ball; of starry hosts—suns like our own—numberless as the sands on the shore; of worlds and systems shooting through the infinite spaces, with a velocity compared with which the cannon-ball is a way-worn, heavy-paced traveler![A]
But the main goal of all knowledge is to expand and purify the soul, to fill the mind with uplifting thoughts, to provide refined enjoyment, and to guide our limited reasoning from the works of nature to its great Creator and Sustainer. Viewing this as the ultimate purpose of science, no branch can rightfully take precedence over Astronomy. No other science gives such a clear representation of the concepts that underlie our intellectual framework; the significant ideas of time, space, extension, magnitude, number, motion, and power. How magnificent is the idea of the eons required for some of the long-term equations of the solar system; of distances so vast that the light from a fixed star would take twenty million years to reach us; of sizes that make the Earth seem like a mere football; of starry hosts—suns like our own—countless as the grains of sand on the shore; of worlds and systems moving through infinite space at speeds that make a cannonball seem like a slow, tired traveler![A]
THE SPECTACLE OF THE HEAVENS.
THE SHOW IN THE SKY.
Much, however, as we are indebted to our observatories for elevating our conceptions of the heavenly bodies, they present, even to the unaided sight, scenes of glory which words are too feeble to describe. I had occasion, a few weeks since, to take the early train from Providence to Boston; and for this purpose rose at 2 o'clock in the morning. Every thing around was wrapped in darkness and hushed in silence, broken only by what seemed at that hour the unearthly clank and rush of the train. It was a mild, serene midsummer's night; the sky was without a cloud—the winds were whist. The moon, then in the last quarter, had just risen, and the stars shone with a spectral luster but little affected by her presence; Jupiter, two hours high, was the herald of the day; the Pleiades, just above the horizon, shed their sweet influence in the east; Lyra sparkled near the zenith; Andromeda veiled her newly discovered glories from the naked eye in the south; the steady Pointers, far beneath the pole, looked meekly up from the depths of the north to their sovereign.
Much as we owe to our observatories for enhancing our understanding of the celestial bodies, they still offer sights of beauty that words simply can't capture. A few weeks ago, I took the early train from Providence to Boston, waking up at 2 o'clock in the morning for the journey. Everything around me was shrouded in darkness and wrapped in silence, only interrupted by the eerie clanking and rushing of the train. It was a calm, mild midsummer night; the sky was clear and the winds were still. The moon, in its last quarter, had just risen, and the stars glimmered with an otherworldly brightness, barely affected by her light; Jupiter, already two hours high, signaled the approach of dawn; the Pleiades, just above the horizon, cast their gentle glow in the east; Lyra twinkled near the zenith; Andromeda hid her recently revealed wonders from the naked eye in the south; while the steady Pointers, far below the pole, looked up humbly from the northern depths to their king.
Such was the glorious spectacle as I entered the train. As we proceeded, the timid approach of twilight became more perceptible; the intense blue of the sky began to soften, the smaller stars, like little children, went first to rest; the sister-beams of the Pleiades soon melted together; but the bright [37]constellations of the west and north remained unchanged. Steadily the wondrous transfiguration went on. Hands of angels hidden from mortal eyes shifted the scenery of the heavens; the glories of night dissolved into the glories of the dawn. The blue sky now turned more softly gray; the great watch-stars shut up their holy eyes; the east began to kindle. Faint streaks of purple soon blushed along the sky; the whole celestial concave was filled with the inflowing tides of the morning light, which came pouring down from above in one great ocean of radiance; till at length, as we reached the Blue Hills, a flash of purple fire blazed out from above the horizon, and turned the dewy teardrops of flower and leaf into rubies and diamonds. In a few seconds the everlasting gates of the morning were thrown wide open, and the lord of day, arrayed in glories too severe for the gaze of man, began his course.
It was a beautiful scene as I boarded the train. As we moved along, the gentle approach of twilight became more noticeable; the deep blue of the sky started to soften, and the smaller stars, like little kids, went to bed first; the sister-beams of the Pleiades soon blended together; but the bright [37] constellations of the west and north stayed the same. The amazing transformation continued steadily. Invisible hands of angels shifted the scenery of the heavens; the beauty of night dissolved into the beauty of dawn. The blue sky gradually turned a softer gray; the great watch-stars closed their holy eyes; the east began to light up. Faint streaks of purple soon glowed along the sky; the entire celestial dome was filled with the incoming waves of morning light, pouring down from above in a vast ocean of brightness; until finally, as we reached the Blue Hills, a burst of purple fire flared up above the horizon, turning the dewy drops on flowers and leaves into rubies and diamonds. In just a few moments, the everlasting gates of the morning swung wide open, and the sun, adorned in glories too intense for human eyes, began its journey.
I do not wonder at the superstition of the ancient Magians, who in the morning of the world went up to the hill-tops of Central Asia, and ignorant of the true God, adored the most glorious work of his hand. But I am filled with amazement, when I am told that in this enlightened age, and in the heart of the Christian world, there are persons who can witness this daily manifestation of the power and wisdom of the Creator, and yet say in their hearts, "There is no God."
I don't find it surprising that the ancient Magians, back in the early days, climbed the hills of Central Asia and, not knowing the true God, worshipped His most magnificent creations. But I am truly amazed when I hear that in this modern age, right in the center of the Christian world, there are people who can see this daily display of the Creator's power and wisdom and still think to themselves, "There is no God."
UNDISCOVERED BODIES.
UNDETECTED BODIES.
Numerous as are the heavenly bodies visible to the naked eye, and glorious as are their manifestations, it is probable that in our own system there are great numbers as yet undiscovered. Just two hundred years ago this year, Huyghens announced the discovery of one satellite of Saturn, and expressed the opinion that the six planets and six satellites then known, and making up the perfect number of twelve, composed the whole of our planetary system. In 1729 an astronomical writer expressed the opinion that there might be other bodies in our system, but that the limit of telescopic power had been reached, and no further discoveries were likely to be made.[A] The orbit of one comet only had been definitively calculated. Since that time the power of the telescope has been indefinitely increased; two primary planets of the first class, ten satellites, and forty-three small planets revolving between Mars and Jupiter, have been discovered, the orbits of six or seven hundred comets, some of brief period, have been ascertained;—and it has been computed, that hundreds of thousands of these mysterious bodies wander through our system. There is no reason to think that all the primary planets, which revolve about the sun, have been discovered. An indefinite increase in the number of asteroids may be anticipated; while outside of Neptune, between our sun and the nearest fixed star, supposing the attraction of the sun to prevail through half the distance, there is room for ten more primary planets succeeding each other at distances increasing in a geometrical ratio. The first of these will, unquestionably, be discovered as soon as the perturbations of Neptune shall have been accurately observed; and with maps [38]of the heavens, on which the smallest telescopic stars are laid down, it may be discovered much sooner.
As many heavenly bodies as are visible to the naked eye, and as stunning as they are, it's likely that there are many more in our own solar system that remain undiscovered. Just 200 years ago this year, Huyghens announced the discovery of one of Saturn's moons and believed that the six planets and six moons known at the time, making a perfect total of twelve, represented the entirety of our solar system. In 1729, an astronomy writer suggested that there could be other bodies in our solar system, but stated that the limits of telescope power had been reached, so further discoveries were unlikely.[A] Only the orbit of one comet had been calculated definitively. Since then, the power of telescopes has increased dramatically; we've discovered two major planets, ten moons, and forty-three small planets orbiting between Mars and Jupiter, and established the orbits of six or seven hundred comets, some of which have short periods. It's estimated that there are hundreds of thousands of these mysterious bodies roaming our solar system. There's no reason to believe that all the major planets orbiting the sun have been found. We can expect a significant increase in the number of asteroids; meanwhile, beyond Neptune, between our sun and the nearest fixed star, assuming the sun's gravity extends halfway, there is space for ten more major planets that would be spaced at increasingly larger distances in a geometric ratio. The first of these will surely be discovered once Neptune’s perturbations have been accurately observed; and with star maps that include even the faintest telescopic stars, it could be found much sooner. [38]
THE VASTNESS OF CREATION.
THE IMMENSITY OF CREATION.
But it is when we turn our observation and our thoughts from our own system, to the systems which lie beyond it in the heavenly spaces, that we approach a more adequate conception of the vastness of creation. All analogy teaches us that the sun which gives light to us is but one of those countless stellar fires which deck the firmament, and that every glittering star in that shining host is the center of a system as vast and as full of subordinate luminaries as our own. Of these suns—centers of planetary systems—thousands are visible to the naked eye, millions are discovered by the telescope. Sir John Herschell, in the account of his operations at the Cape of Good Hope (p. 381) calculates that about five and a half millions of stars are visible enough to be distinctly counted in a twenty-foot reflector, in both hemispheres. He adds, that "the actual number is much greater, there can be little doubt." His illustrious father, estimated on one occasion that 125,000 stars passed through the field of his forty foot reflector in a quarter of an hour. This would give 12,000,000 for the entire circuit of the heavens, in a single telescopic zone; and this estimate was made under the assumption that the nebulæ were masses of luminous matter not yet condensed into suns.
But when we shift our focus from our own system to the systems that exist in the vastness of space, we begin to grasp a better understanding of the enormity of creation. All comparisons show us that the sun, which provides light for us, is just one of countless stars sprinkled across the sky, and that every sparkling star in that bright assembly is the center of a system as vast and filled with smaller stars as our own. Thousands of these suns—centers of planetary systems—are visible to the naked eye, while millions have been identified using telescopes. Sir John Herschell, in his report on his work at the Cape of Good Hope (p. 381), calculates that around five and a half million stars can be distinctly counted using a twenty-foot reflector in both hemispheres. He adds that "the actual number is much greater, there can be little doubt." His famous father once estimated that 125,000 stars passed through the view of his forty-foot reflector in just a quarter of an hour. This would imply a total of 12,000,000 stars for the entire sky in a single telescopic zone; this estimate was made under the assumption that the nebulae were clusters of luminous matter not yet formed into suns.
These stupendous calculations, however, form but the first column of the inventory of the universe. Faint white specks are visible, even to the naked eye of a practiced observer in different parts of the heavens. Under high magnifying powers, several thousands of such spots are visible,—no longer however, faint, white specks, but many of them resolved by powerful telescopes into vast aggregations of stars, each of which may, with propriety, be compared with the milky way. Many of these nebulæ, however, resisted the power of Sir Wm. Herschell's great reflector, and were, accordingly, still regarded by him as masses of unformed matter, not yet condensed into suns. This, till a few years since, was, perhaps, the prevailing opinion; and the nebular theory filled a large space in modern astronomical science. But with the increase of instrumental power, especially under the mighty grasp of Lord Rosse's gigantic reflector, and the great refractors at Pulkova and Cambridge, the most irresolvable of these nebulæ have given way; and the better opinion now is, that every one of them is a galaxy, like our own milky way, composed of millions of suns. In other words, we are brought to the bewildering conclusion that thousands of these misty specks, the greater part of them too faint to be seen with the naked eye, are, not each a universe like our solar system, but each a "swarm" of universes of unappreciable magnitude.[A] The mind sinks, overpowered by the contemplation. We repeat the words, but they no longer convey distinct ideas to the understanding.
These amazing calculations, however, are just the first part of the universe's inventory. Faint white dots can be seen, even by the naked eye of an experienced observer, in various parts of the sky. Under powerful magnification, thousands of these spots are visible—not just faint white dots, but many of them have been seen through powerful telescopes as vast collections of stars, each comparable to the Milky Way. However, many of these nebulae resisted the power of Sir Wm. Herschell's large reflector and were still considered by him as masses of unformed matter, not yet turned into suns. Until a few years ago, this was perhaps the common belief, and the nebular theory took up a significant space in modern astronomy. But with advancements in observational tools, especially with Lord Rosse's enormous reflector and the great refractors at Pulkova and Cambridge, even the most difficult nebulae to resolve have been understood; the prevailing belief now is that each one of them is a galaxy, like our Milky Way, made up of millions of suns. In other words, we are led to the astonishing conclusion that thousands of these hazy dots, most of them too faint to be seen with the naked eye, are not just individual universes like our solar system but rather a "swarm" of universes of unimaginable size.[A] The mind struggles to keep up with this thought. We repeat the words, but they no longer translate into clear ideas in our minds.
[A] Humboldt's Cosmos, iii. 41.
Humboldt's Cosmos, vol. 3, p. 41.
CONCEPTIONS OF THE UNIVERSE.
UNIVERSE CONCEPTS.
But these conclusions, however vast their comprehension, carry us but another step forward in the realms of sidereal astronomy. A proper motion in space of our sun, and of the fixed stars as we call them, has long been believed to exist. Their vast distances only prevent its being more apparent. The great improvement of instruments of measurement within the last generation has not only established the existence of this motion, but has pointed to the region in the starry vault around which our whole solar and stellar system, with its myriad of attendant planetary worlds, appears to be performing a mighty revolution. If, then, we assume that outside of the system to which we belong and in which our sun is but a star like Aldebaran or Sirius, the different nebulæ of which we have spoken,—thousands of which spot the heavens—constitute a distinct family of universes, we must, following the guide of analogy, attribute to each of them also, beyond all the revolutions of their individual attendant planetary systems, a great revolution, comprehending the whole; while the same course of analogical reasoning would lead us still further onward, and in the last analysis, require us to assume a transcendental connection between all these mighty systems—a universe of universes, circling round in the infinity of space, and preserving its equilibrium by the same laws of mutual attraction which bind the lower worlds together.
But these conclusions, no matter how broad their understanding, only take us another step forward in the field of distant astronomy. It's long been believed that our sun, along with the fixed stars, has a proper motion in space. Their vast distances make this motion less obvious. The significant advancements in measurement instruments over the last generation have not only confirmed this motion but have also indicated the area in the night sky around which our entire solar and stellar system, along with its countless orbiting planets, seems to be making a huge revolution. If we assume that beyond the system we belong to—where our sun is just another star like Aldebaran or Sirius—the various nebulae we've mentioned—thousands of which dot the skies—form a separate family of universes, we should, following the logic of analogy, assign to each of them, in addition to the revolutions of their own planetary systems, a major revolution encompassing everything. This same reasoning would take us even further, ultimately leading us to assume a transcendental connection among all these massive systems—a universe of universes, revolving in the vastness of space and maintaining balance through the same laws of mutual attraction that bind the smaller worlds together.
It may be thought that conceptions like these are calculated rather to depress than to elevate us in the scale of being; that, banished as he is by these contemplations to a corner of creation, and there reduced to an atom, man sinks to nothingness in this infinity of worlds. But a second thought corrects the impression. These vast contemplations are well calculated to inspire awe, but not abasement. Mind and matter are incommensurable. An immortal soul, even while clothed in "this muddy vesture of decay," is in the eye of God and reason, a purer essence than the brightest sun that lights the depths of heaven. The organized human eye, instinct with life and soul, which, gazing through the telescope, travels up to the cloudy speck in the handle of Orion's sword, and bids it blaze forth into a galaxy as vast as ours, stands higher in the order of being than all that host of luminaries. The intellect of Newton which discovered the law that holds the revolving worlds together, is a nobler work of God than a universe of universes of unthinking matter.
It might seem that ideas like these are more likely to bring us down rather than lift us up in the hierarchy of existence; that, as we get pushed into a small corner of creation and reduced to a mere speck, humanity fades into insignificance in this vast expanse of worlds. But upon further reflection, this impression is corrected. These expansive thoughts are designed to inspire not humiliation but awe. Mind and matter cannot be compared. An immortal soul, even while wrapped in "this muddy garment of decay," is, in the eyes of God and reason, a purer essence than the brightest sun illuminating the heavens. The human eye, alive with spirit and soul, which, peering through the telescope, looks up to the small blur in Orion's sword and causes it to shine as a galaxy as immense as ours, holds a higher place in the hierarchy of existence than all those countless stars. The intellect of Newton, which uncovered the law that keeps the rotating worlds in harmony, is a greater creation of God than a universe full of lifeless matter.
If, still treading the loftiest paths of analogy, we adopt the supposition,—to me I own the grateful supposition,—that the countless planetary worlds which attend these countless suns, are the abodes of rational beings like man, instead of bringing back from this exalted conception a feeling of insignificance, as if the individuals of our race were but poor atoms in the infinity of being, I regard it, on the contrary, as a glory of our human nature, that it belongs to a family which no man can number of rational natures like itself. In the order of being they may stand beneath us, or they may stand above us; he may well be content with his place, who is made "a little lower than the angels."
If we continue on the highest paths of comparison and accept the idea—one that I find genuinely inspiring—that the countless planets orbiting these countless suns are homes to rational beings like us, instead of feeling insignificant in this grand concept, as if we were just tiny specks in the vastness of existence, I actually see it as a source of pride for humanity that we belong to a multitude of rational beings beyond counting. In the grand scheme of existence, they might be below us or above us; anyone made "a little lower than the angels" can surely be content with their place.
CONTEMPLATION OF THE HEAVENS.
Gazing at the stars.
Finally, my Friends, I believe there is no contemplation better adapted to awaken devout ideas than that of the heavenly bodies,—no branch of natural science which bears clearer testimony to the power and wisdom of God than that to which you this day consecrate a temple. The heart of the ancient world, with all the prevailing ignorance of the true nature and motions of the heavenly orbs, was religiously impressed by their survey. There is a passage in one of those admirable philosophical treatises of Cicero composed in the decline of life, as a solace under domestic bereavement and patriotic concern at the impending convulsions of the state, in which, quoting from some lost work of Aristotle, he treats the topic in a manner which almost puts to shame the teachings of Christian wisdom.
Finally, my friends, I believe there's no thought better suited to inspire spiritual ideas than reflecting on the heavenly bodies—no area of natural science that clearly demonstrates the power and wisdom of God more than the one you dedicate a temple to today. The heart of the ancient world, despite its widespread misunderstanding of the true nature and movements of the celestial bodies, was deeply moved by observing them. There's a passage in one of Cicero's remarkable philosophical writings, composed later in his life as a comfort during personal loss and concerns about the turmoil facing the state, where he references a lost work by Aristotle. He discusses the topic in a way that nearly outshines the teachings of Christian wisdom.
"Præclare ergo Aristoteles, 'Si essent,' inquit, 'qui sub terra semper habitavissent, bonis et illustribus domiciliis quæ essent ornata signis atque picturis, instructaque rebus iis omnibus quibus abundant ii qui beati putantur, nec tamen exissent unquam supra terram; accepissent autem fama et auditione, esse quoddam numen et vim Deorum,—deinde aliquo tempore patefactis terræ faucibus ex illis abditis sedibus evadere in hæc loca quæ nos incolimus, atque exire potuissent; cum repente terram et maria coelumque, vidissent; nubium magnitudinem ventorumque vim, cognovissent; aspexissentque solem, ejusque tum magnitudinem, pulchritudinemque; tum etiam efficientiam cognovissent, quod is diem efficeret, toto cœlo luce diffusa; cum autem terras nox opacasset, tum cœlum totum cernerent astris distinctum et ornatum, lunæque luminum varietatem tum crescentis tum senescentis, corumque omnium ortus et occasus atque in æternitate ratos immutabilesque cursus;—hæc cum viderent, profecto et esse Deos, et hæc tanta opera Deorum esse, arbitrarentur."[A]
"Therefore, Aristotle says, 'If there were those who had always lived underground, in beautiful and well-decorated homes adorned with signs and paintings, filled with all the things that those who are considered blessed enjoy, and they had never come above ground; if they had heard tales and gossip about a certain divine presence and the power of the gods—then at some point, with the doors of the earth opened, they could have escaped from those hidden places into these areas we inhabit and emerged; suddenly they would see the earth, the seas, and the sky; they would learn the size of the clouds and the power of the winds, and they would gaze upon the sun, recognizing its size and beauty; they would also understand its effect, illuminating the whole sky with light; when the lands were covered in darkness, they would then see the entire sky adorned with stars, the variety of the moon’s lights during its waxing and waning, and the fixed, unchangeable paths of all these celestial bodies in their eternal rise and set;—upon seeing all this, they would certainly believe in the existence of gods and consider these magnificent works to be the creations of the gods.'"[A]
There is much by day to engage the attention of the Observatory; the sun, his apparent motions, his dimensions, the spots on his disc (to us the faint indications of movements of unimagined grandeur in his luminous atmosphere), a solar eclipse, a transit of the inferior planets, the mysteries of the spectrum;—all phenomena of vast importance and interest. But night is the astronomer's accepted time; he goes to his delightful labors when the [41]busy world goes to its rest. A dark pall spreads over the resorts of active life; terrestrial objects, hill and valley, and rock and stream, and the abodes of men disappear; but the curtain is drawn up which concealed the heavenly hosts. There they shine and there they move, as they moved and shone to the eyes of Newton and Galileo, of Kepler and Copernicus, of Ptolemy and Hipparchus; yes, as they moved and shone when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy. All has changed on earth; but the glorious heavens remain unchanged. The plow passes over the site of mighty cities,—the homes of powerful nations are desolate, the languages they spoke are forgotten; but the stars that shone for them are shining for us; the same eclipses run their steady cycle; the same equinoxes call out the flowers of spring, and send the husbandman to the harvest; the sun pauses at either tropic as he did when his course began; and sun and moon, and planet and satellite, and star and constellation and galaxy, still bear witness to the power, the wisdom, and the love, which placed them in the heavens and uphold them there.
There’s a lot during the day to capture the Observatory's interest. The sun, its movements, its size, the spots on its surface (which hint at incredible activity in its glowing atmosphere), solar eclipses, the transits of inferior planets, and the mysteries of the spectrum—all these are phenomena of great significance and intrigue. But nighttime is when astronomers truly get to work; they dive into their enjoyable tasks as the busy world settles down for rest. A dark veil blankets the active life; earthly sights like hills, valleys, rocks, streams, and human dwellings fade away, but the curtain is lifted to reveal the heavenly bodies. They shine and move just as they did for Newton and Galileo, Kepler and Copernicus, Ptolemy and Hipparchus; yes, just as they moved and shone when the morning stars sang together and all the heavenly beings rejoiced. Everything has changed on Earth; yet the magnificent heavens remain constant. The plow goes over the ruins of great cities—the homes of powerful nations lie in ruins, and the languages they spoke are forgotten; yet the stars that once lit their skies still shine for us; the same eclipses follow their steady course; the same equinoxes bring forth the spring flowers and send farmers out to harvest; the sun continues to pause at either tropic just as it did at the start of its journey; and the sun, moon, planets, satellites, stars, constellations, and galaxies continue to testify to the power, wisdom, and love that placed them in the sky and keeps them there.
[A] "Nobly does Aristotle observe, that if there were beings who had always lived under ground, in convenient, nay, in magnificent dwellings, adorned with statues and pictures, and every thing which belongs to prosperous life, but who had never come above ground; who had heard, however, by fame and report, of the being and power of the gods; if, at a certain time, the portals of the earth being thrown open, they had been able to emerge from those hidden abodes to the regions inhabited by us; when suddenly they had seen the earth, the sea, and the sky; had perceived the vastness of the clouds and the force of the winds; had contemplated the sun, his magnitude and his beauty, and still more his effectual power, that it is he who makes the day, by the diffusion of his light through the whole sky; and, when night had darkened the earth, should then behold the whole heavens studded and adorned with stars, and the various lights of the waxing and waning moon, the risings and the settings of all these heavenly bodies, and the courses fixed and immutable in all eternity; when, I say, they should see these things, truly they would believe that there were gods, and these so great things are their works."—Cicero, De Natura Deorum lib. ii., § 30.
[A] "Aristotle wisely points out that if there were beings who had always lived underground, in comfortable, even magnificent homes decorated with statues and paintings and all the things that come with a prosperous life, but who had never been above ground; and if they had heard, through rumors and reports, about the existence and power of the gods; then, at a certain time, if the earth’s portals were opened and they could emerge from their hidden homes to the world we inhabit; upon suddenly seeing the earth, the sea, and the sky; noticing the vastness of the clouds and the strength of the winds; contemplating the sun, its size and beauty, and even more its effective power, as it creates day by spreading its light across the entire sky; and when night darkened the earth, they would behold the heavens filled and adorned with stars, along with the different phases of the waxing and waning moon, the rising and setting of all these heavenly bodies, and the courses that are fixed and unchanging for all eternity; when, I say, they would see these things, they would definitely believe that there were gods, and that these magnificent things are their creations."—Cicero, De Natura Deorum lib. ii., § 30.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!