This is a modern-English version of Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation: With Modifications To Obsolete Language By Monica Stevens, originally written by More, Thomas, Saint.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Produced by David McClamrock
Produced by David McClamrock
DIALOGUE OF COMFORT AGAINST TRIBULATION
by St. Thomas More
by Thomas More
with modifications to obsolete language by Monica Stevens
with updates to outdated language by Monica Stevens
______________________________
______________________________
PUBLISHED 1951 BY SHEED AND WARD, LTD. 110/111 FLEET STREET, LONDON, E.C.4 AND SHEED AND WARD, INC. 830 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, 3
______________________________
I'm ready to assist you. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.
NOTE
This edition of the Dialogue of Comfort has been transcribed from the 1557 version as it appears in Everyman's Library. The Everyman edition is heartily recommended to readers who would like to taste the dialogue in its original form.
This edition of the Dialogue of Comfort has been copied from the 1557 version as it appears in Everyman's Library. The Everyman edition is highly recommended for readers who want to experience the dialogue in its original form.
The first plan was to change only the spelling. It soon became evident that the punctuation would have to be changed to follow present usage. The longest sentences were then broken up into two or three, and certain others were rearranged into a word order more like that of today. Nothing was omitted, however, and nothing was added except relative pronouns, parts of "to be," and other such neutral connectives. Finally, obsolete words were changed to more familiar equivalents except when they were entirely clear and too good to lose. Thus "wot" became "know" but "gigglot" and "galp up the ghost" were retained. Words that have come to have a quite different meaning for us, such as "fond" and "lust" were replaced by less ambiguous ones—wherever possible, by ones that More himself used elsewhere.
The initial plan was to change only the spelling. It quickly became clear that the punctuation needed to be updated to match current usage. The longest sentences were then split into two or three, and some were rearranged into a word order that’s more like what we use today. Nothing was left out, though, and nothing was added except for relative pronouns, parts of "to be," and other neutral connectors. In the end, outdated words were replaced with more familiar ones unless they were entirely clear and too valuable to lose. So, "wot" became "know," but "gigglot" and "galp up the ghost" were kept. Words that have taken on a completely different meaning for us, like "fond" and "lust," were swapped for less ambiguous ones—whenever possible, ones that More himself used elsewhere.
The text has not been cut or expanded, re-interpreted or edited. Any transcription seems to involve some interpretation, conscious or otherwise, but an effort has been made to keep it to a minimum. Passages that seemed to make no sense have therefore been left unaltered. If other readers find solutions for them their suggestions will be welcomed.
The text hasn’t been shortened or lengthened, reinterpreted, or edited. Any transcription might involve some interpretation, whether intentional or not, but we’ve tried to keep that to a minimum. Passages that didn’t make sense have been left unchanged. If other readers come up with solutions for them, their suggestions will be appreciated.
This is not in any sense a scholarly piece of work. That would require a very different method, as well as a far more thorough knowledge of sixteenth-century English. It would be a most commendable undertaking, but it might result in an edition for the learned. This one is for everyone who has the two essentials, faith and intelligence, presupposed by Anthony in Chapter II.
This is not at all a scholarly work. That would need a completely different approach and a much deeper understanding of sixteenth-century English. It would be a highly commendable effort, but it might lead to an edition meant for scholars. This one is for anyone who has the two key qualities, faith and intelligence, that Anthony assumes in Chapter II.
MONICA STEVENS
Middlebury, Vermont.
Feast of St. Benedict, 1950.
Middlebury, Vermont.
Feast of St. Benedict, 1950.
______________________________
______________________________
BOOK ONE
VINCENT: Who would have thought, O my good uncle, a few years past, that those in this country who would visit their friends lying in disease and sickness would come, as I do now, to seek and fetch comfort of them? Or who would have thought that in giving comfort to them they would use the way that I may well use to you? For albeit that the priests and friars be wont to call upon sick men to remember death, yet we worldly friends, for fear of discomforting them, have ever had a way here in Hungary of lifting up their hearts and putting them in good hope of life.
VINCENT: Who would have thought, my dear uncle, just a few years ago, that people in this country would come to visit their friends who are ill, seeking comfort from them as I do now? Or who would have imagined that in offering comfort, they would use the same approach that I might use with you? Although the priests and friars often remind sick people about death, we friends here in Hungary, worried about making them feel worse, have always had a way of uplifting their spirits and giving them hope for recovery.
But now, my good uncle, the world is here waxed such, and so great perils appear here to fall at hand, that methinketh the greatest comfort a man can have is when he can see that he shall soon be gone. And we who are likely long to live here in wretchedness have need of some comforting counsel against tribulation to be given us by such as you, good uncle. For you have so long lived virtuously, and are so learned in the law of God that very few are better in this country. And you have had yourself good experience and assay of such things as we do now fear, as one who hath been taken prisoner in Turkey two times in your days, and is now likely to depart hence ere long.
But now, my dear uncle, the world has become such a troubling place, and so many dangers are looming ahead, that I think the greatest comfort a person can find is knowing that their time here is almost over. We, who are likely to live on in misery, really need some comforting advice against the hardships we face from someone like you, dear uncle. You have lived a virtuous life for so long and are so knowledgeable about God's law that very few are better than you in this country. You also have firsthand experience with the kinds of things we now fear, having been captured in Turkey twice in your lifetime, and you seem likely to leave this world soon.
But that may be your great comfort, good uncle, since you depart to God. But us of your kindred shall you leave here, a company of sorry comfortless orphans. For to all of us your good help, comfort, and counsel hath long been a great stay—not as an uncle to some, and to others as one further of kin, but as though to us all you had been a natural father.
But that might be your greatest comfort, dear uncle, as you go to God. But us, your family, you’ll leave here, a group of sorrowful, comfortless orphans. For to all of us, your kindness, support, and guidance have long been a significant source of strength—not just as an uncle to some, and to others as a more distant relative, but as if you had truly been a father to us all.
ANTHONY: Mine own good cousin, I cannot much deny but what there is indeed, not only here in Hungary but also in almost all places in Christendom, such a customary manner of unchristian comforting. And in any sick man it doth more harm than good, by drawing him in time of sickness, with looking and longing for life, from the meditation of death, judgment, heaven, and hell, with which he should beset much of his time—even all his whole life in his best health. Yet is that manner of comfort to my mind more than mad when it is used to a man of mine age. For as we well know that a young man may die soon, so are we very sure that an old man cannot live long. And yet there is (as Tully saith) no man so old but that, for all that, he hopeth yet that he may live one year more, and of a frail folly delighteth to think thereon and comfort himself therewith. So other men's words of such comfort, adding more sticks to that fire, shall (in a manner) quite burn up the pleasant moisture that should most refresh him—the wholesome dew, I mean, of God's grace, by which he should wish with God's will to be hence, and long to be with him in Heaven.
ANTHONY: My good cousin, I can't deny that there is indeed, not just here in Hungary but in almost every place in Christendom, a common way of offering unchristian comfort. In the case of any sick person, it does more harm than good by pulling them away from thinking about death, judgment, heaven, and hell—thoughts they should occupy themselves with, really throughout their whole lives, especially when they're healthy. To me, this kind of comfort seems downright crazy when it's given to someone my age. As we know well, a young person can die young, but an old person can’t expect to live much longer. And yet, as Cicero says, no one is so old that they don’t hope to live just one more year, finding foolish joy in that thought and comforting themselves with it. So when others offer such comfort, they’re just adding more fuel to the fire that will essentially burn up the pleasant refreshment—that wholesome dew of God's grace—that should inspire him to yearn, with God's will, to leave this life behind and long to be with Him in Heaven.
Now, as for your taking my departing from you so heavily (as that of one from whom you recognize, of your goodness, to have had here before help and comfort), would God I had done to you and to others half so much as I myself reckon it would have been my duty to do! But whensoever God may take me hence, to reckon yourselves then comfortless, as though your chief comfort stood in me—therein would you make, methinketh, a reckoning very much as though you would cast away a strong staff and lean upon a rotten reed. For God is, and must be, your comfort, and not I. And he is a sure comforter, who (as he said unto his disciples) never leaveth his servants comfortless orphans, not even when he departed from his disciples by death. But he both sent them a comforter, as he had promised, the Holy Spirit of his Father and himself, and he also made them sure that to the world's end he would ever dwell with them himself. And therefore, if you be part of his flock and believe his promise, how can you be comfortless in any tribulation, when Christ and his Holy Spirit, and with them their inseparable Father, if you put full trust and confidence in them, are never either one finger-breadth of space nor one minute of time from you?
Now, about how hard it is for you to see me leave (considering the help and comfort you’ve received from me), I wish I had done even half as much for you and others as I believe it was my duty to do! But whenever God calls me away, to think of yourselves as helpless—like your main support relies on me—would be like throwing away a strong staff and relying on a broken reed. God is, and must be, your source of comfort, not me. He is a reliable comforter, who (as he told his disciples) never leaves his servants comfortless or as orphans, even when he departed from them through death. He sent them a comforter, just as he promised, the Holy Spirit from himself and the Father, and assured them that he would always be with them until the end of the world. So, if you are part of his flock and believe in his promise, how could you feel helpless in any trouble, when Christ and his Holy Spirit, along with their inseparable Father, are never even a finger's length or a minute away from you if you trust and rely on them fully?
VINCENT: O, my good uncle, even these selfsame words, with which you prove that because of God's own gracious presence we cannot be left comfortless, make me now feel and perceive how much comfort we shall miss when you are gone. For albeit, good uncle, that while you tell me this I cannot but grant it for true, yet if I had not now heard it from you, I would not have remembered it, nor would it have fallen to my mind. And moreover, as our tribulations shall increase in weight and number, so shall we need not only one such good word or twain, but a great heap of them, to stable and strengthen the walls of our hearts against the great surges of this tempestuous sea.
VINCENT: Oh, my dear uncle, even your very words, which remind me that because of God’s gracious presence we can’t be left without comfort, make me realize how much comfort we’ll lose when you’re gone. Although, good uncle, while you’re telling me this, I can’t help but agree it’s true, if I hadn’t heard it from you just now, I wouldn’t have remembered it, and it wouldn’t have come to my mind. Furthermore, as our troubles grow heavier and more numerous, we’ll need not just one or two uplifting words, but a whole bunch of them, to stabilize and strengthen our hearts against the fierce waves of this stormy sea.
ANTHONY: Good cousin, trust well in God and he shall provide you outward teachers suitable for every time, or else shall himself sufficiently teach you inwardly.
ANTHONY: Good cousin, have faith in God, and He will provide you with the right teachers for every situation, or He will teach you internally in a way that is enough.
VINCENT: Very well, good uncle, but yet if we would leave the seeking of outward learning, when we can have it, and look to be inwardly taught by God alone, then should be thereby tempt God and displease him. And since I now see the likelihood that when you are gone we shall be sore destitute of any other like you, therefore methinketh that God bindeth me of duty to pray you now, good uncle, in this short time that we have you, that I may learn of you such plenty of good counsel and comfort, against these great storms of tribulation with which both I and all mine are sore beaten already, and now upon the coming of this cruel Turk fear to fall in far more, that I may, with the same laid up in remembrance, govern and stay the ship of our kindred and keep it afloat from peril of spiritual drowning.
VINCENT: Alright, good uncle, but if we ignore the chance to learn from the world when we can and only rely on being taught by God, we might be tempting Him and making Him unhappy. And since I realize that once you’re gone, we will be greatly lacking anyone like you, I feel it’s my duty to ask you now, dear uncle, in this short time we have with you, to teach me as much good advice and comfort as you can, to help me face the huge storms of trouble that both I and my family are already struggling with. With the threat of this cruel Turk, I fear things will get much worse, and I want to keep the ship of our family steady and afloat from the danger of spiritual drowning.
You are not ignorant, good uncle, what heaps of heaviness have of late fallen among us already, with which some of our poor family are fallen into such dumps that scantly can any such comfort as my poor wit can give them at all assuage their sorrow. And now, since these tidings have come hither, so hot with the great Turk's enterprise into these parts here, we can scantly talk nor think of anything else than his might and our danger. There falleth so continually before the eyes of our heart a fearful imagination of this terrible thing: his mighty strength and power, his high malice and hatred, and his incomparable cruelty, with robbing, spoiling, burning, and laying waste all the way that his army cometh; then, killing or carrying away the people thence, far from home, and there severing the couples and the kindred asunder, every one far from the other, some kept in thraldom and some kept in prison and some for a triumph tormented and killed in his presence; then, sending his people hither and his false faith too, so that such as are here and still remain shall either both lose all and be lost too, or be forced to forsake the faith of our Saviour Christ and fall to the false sect of Mahomet. And yet—that which we fear more than all the rest—no small part of our own folk who dwell even here about us are, we fear, falling to him or already confederated with him. If this be so, it may haply keep this quarter from the Turk's invasion. But then shall they that turn to his law leave all their neighbours nothing, but shall have our goods given them and our bodies too, unless we turn as they do and forsake our Saviour too. And then—for there is no born Turk so cruel to Christian folk as is the false Christian that falleth from the faith—we shall stand in peril, if we persevere in the truth, to be more hardly handled and die a more cruel death by our own countrymen at home than if we were taken hence and carried into Turkey. These fearful heaps of peril lie so heavy at our hearts, since we know not into which we shall fortune to fall and therefore fear all the worst, that (as our Saviour prophesied of the people of Jerusalem) many among us wish already, before the peril come, that the mountains would overwhelm them or the valleys open and swallow them up and cover them.
You’re not unaware, dear uncle, of the heavy burdens that have recently fallen upon us, which have made some of our struggling family members so downcast that the little comfort my limited understanding can offer barely eases their pain. And now, with the news of the great Turk’s campaign invading our area, we can hardly think or talk about anything other than his power and our peril. We constantly face a terrifying vision of this dreadful situation: his immense strength and influence, his deep malice and hatred, and his unmatched cruelty, which includes looting, destroying, burning, and devastating everything his army encounters; then, either killing or taking people far from home, separating families and loved ones, with some kept in slavery, some imprisoned, and others tortured and killed to entertain him; and also sending his forces here along with his false beliefs, so that those who remain here will either lose everything and be lost or be forced to abandon our Savior Christ and join the false religion of Mahomet. And yet—what we fear more than anything else—is that a significant portion of our own people living around us are, we worry, turning to him or already allied with him. If that’s true, it might protect this area from the Turk’s invasion. But those who embrace his beliefs will leave their neighbors with nothing, taking our possessions and our lives too, unless we follow their example and forsake our Savior. And then—because no born Turk is as cruel to Christians as a false Christian who abandons the faith—we will be at risk, if we stand firm in the truth, of suffering at the hands of our own people here, facing a more brutal fate and dying a more terrible death at home than if we were captured and taken to Turkey. These frightening challenges weigh heavily on our hearts, since we don’t know which fate awaits us and thus fear the worst, that (as our Savior predicted for the people of Jerusalem) many among us wish even before the danger arrives for the mountains to bury them or for the valleys to open up and swallow them whole.
Therefore, good uncle, against these horrible fears of these terrible tribulations—some of which, as you know, our house hath already, and the rest of which we stand in dread of—give us, while God lendeth you to us, such plenty of your comforting counsel as I may write and keep with us, to stay us when God shall call you hence.
Therefore, dear uncle, in response to these dreadful fears of these terrible troubles—some of which, as you know, our family has already faced, and the others of which we are afraid—please share with us, while God allows you to be with us, as much of your comforting advice as I can write down and keep with us, to support us when God calls you away.
ANTHONY: Ah, my good cousin, this is a heavy hearing. And just as we who dwell here in this part now sorely fear that thing which a few years ago we feared not at all, so I suspect that ere long they shall fear it as much who now think themselves very sure because they dwell further off.
ANTHONY: Ah, my good cousin, this is a tough conversation. Just as we who live here now seriously fear what we didn't worry about at all a few years ago, I suspect that soon enough, those who think they're safe because they live further away will fear it just as much.
Greece feared not the Turk when I was born, and within a while afterward that whole empire was his. The great Sultan of Syria thought himself more than his match, and long since you were born hath he that empire too. Then hath he taken Belgrade, the fortress of this realm. And since that hath he destroyed our noble young goodly king, and now two of them strive for us—our Lord send the grace that the third dog carry not away the bone from them both! What of the noble strong city of Rhodes, the winning of which he counted as a victory against the whole body of Christendom, since all Christendom was not able to defend that strong town against him? Howbeit, if the princes of Christendom everywhere would, where there was need, have set to their hands in time, the Turk would never have taken any one of all those places. But partly because of dissensions fallen among ourselves, and partly because no man careth what harm other folk feel, but each part suffereth the other to shift for itself, the Turk has in a few years wonderfully increased and Christendom on the other hand very sorely decayed. And all this is worked by our wickedness, with which God is not content.
Greece didn't fear the Turk when I was born, and shortly after, that entire empire was his. The great Sultan of Syria thought he could take him on, and long before you were born, he had that empire too. Then he took Belgrade, the fortress of this realm. And since then, he has destroyed our noble young king, and now two of them are fighting over us—may our Lord grant that the third dog doesn't take the bone from both of them! What about the strong city of Rhodes, which he counted as a victory over all of Christendom, since no one in Christendom could defend that strong town against him? However, if the princes of Christendom had acted together where needed, the Turk would never have taken any of those places. But partly due to our internal conflicts and partly because no one cares about the harm others suffer, everyone just looks out for themselves, the Turk has gained power in just a few years while Christendom has severely weakened. All this is a result of our wickedness, which God is not okay with.
But now, whereas you desire of me some plenty of comforting things, which you may put in remembrance, to comfort your company with—verily, in the rehearsing and heaping of your manifold fears, I myself began to feel that there would be much need, against so many troubles, of many comforting counsels. For surely, a little before you came, as I devised with myself upon the Turk's coming, it happened that my mind fell suddenly from that to devising upon my own departing. Now, albeit that I fully put my trust in God and hope to be a saved soul by his mercy, yet no man is here so sure that without revelation he may stand clean out of dread. So I bethought me also upon the pain of hell, and afterward, then, I bethought me upon the Turk again. And at first methought his terror nothing, when I compared with it the joyful hope of heaven. Then I compared it on the other hand with the fearful dread of hell, casting therein in my mind those terrible fiendish tormentors, with the deep consideration of that furious endless fire. And methought that if the Turk with his whole host, and all his trumpets and timbrels too, were to come to my chamber door and kill me in my bed, in respect of the other reckoning I would regard him not a rush. And yet, when I now heard your lamentable words, laying forth as though it were present before my face that heap of heavy sorrowful tribulations that (besides those that are already befallen) are in short space likely to follow, I waxed myself suddenly somewhat dismayed. And therefore I well approve your request in this behalf, since you wish to have a store of comfort beforehand, ready by you to resort to, and to lay up in your heart as a remedy against the poison of all desperate dread that might arise from occasion of sore tribulation. And I shall be glad, as my poor wit shall serve me, to call to mind with you such things as I before have read, heard, or thought upon, that may conveniently serve us to this purpose.
But now, while you’re asking me for some comforting things to remind you and help support your group, honestly, as you went through your many fears, I started to feel that we would really need a lot of comforting advice to deal with so many troubles. Just before you came, as I was thinking about the Turk’s arrival, my mind suddenly shifted to thinking about my own departure. Now, even though I fully trust in God and hope to be saved by His mercy, no one can be so certain here that they can feel completely free from fear without divine revelation. I also thought about the pain of hell, and then I went back to thinking about the Turk. At first, I thought his threat was nothing compared to the joyful hope of heaven. Then, on the other hand, I compared it to the terrifying dread of hell, imagining those dreadful tormentors and the intense, everlasting fire. I felt that if the Turk with his entire army, along with all his trumpets and drums, were to come to my bedroom and kill me in my sleep, compared to the other situation, I wouldn’t take him seriously at all. Yet, after hearing your heartbreaking words, laying out that overwhelming pile of painful tribulations that are likely to follow soon (in addition to those that have already happened), I suddenly felt a bit shaken. So, I completely understand your request since you want to have a stash of comfort ready at hand, something to hold in your heart as a remedy against the poison of all the desperate fears that could arise from serious troubles. I’ll be happy, as much as my limited understanding allows, to think of things I've read, heard, or contemplated that can appropriately help us in this regard.
I
First shall you, good cousin, understand this: The natural wise men of this world, the old moral philosophers, laboured much in this matter. And many natural reasons have they written by which they might encourage men to set little by such goods—or such hurts, either—the going and coming of which are the matter and cause of tribulation. Such are the goods of fortune, riches, favour, friends, fame, worldly honour, and such other things: or of the body, as beauty, strength, agility, liveliness, and health. These things, as you know, coming to us, are matter of worldly wealth. And, taken from us by fortune or by force or the fear of losing them, they are matter of adversity and tribulation. For tribulation seemeth generally to signify nothing else but some kind of grief, either pain of the body or heaviness of the mind. Now that the body should not feel what it feeleth, all the wit in the world cannot bring that about. But that the mind should not be grieved either with the pain that the body feeleth or with occasions of heaviness offered and given unto the soul itself, this thing the philosophers laboured very much about. And many goodly sayings have they toward strength and comfort against tribulation, exciting men to the full contempt of all worldly loss and the despising of sickness and all bodily grief, painful death and all.
First, you should understand this, dear cousin: the wise thinkers of this world, the ancient moral philosophers, put a lot of effort into this topic. They wrote many logical reasons encouraging people to think little of such things—or of such harms—whose rise and fall cause suffering. These include good fortune, wealth, popularity, friends, reputation, worldly honor, and other similar things; or physical attributes like beauty, strength, agility, liveliness, and health. As you know, these things, when they come to us, represent worldly wealth. But when fortune or force takes them away, or when we fear losing them, they become sources of hardship and suffering. Typically, suffering seems to signify nothing but some form of pain, whether it’s physical discomfort or mental anguish. Now, there's no way to prevent the body from feeling its sensations, no matter how clever one is. However, philosophers have intensely focused on how to prevent the mind from being troubled by the body’s pain or by causes of sorrow that the soul encounters. They’ve offered many wise sayings to strengthen and comfort against suffering, urging people to fully disregard all worldly losses and to look down upon illness and all physical pain, including painful death and everything associated with it.
Howbeit, indeed, for anything that ever I read in them, I never could yet find that those natural reasons were ever able to give sufficient comfort of themselves. For they never stretch so far but that they leave untouched, for lack of necessary knowledge, that special point which not only is the chief comfort of all but without which also all other comforts are nothing. And that point is to refer the final end of their comfort unto God, and to repute and take for the special cause of comfort that by the patient sufferance of their tribulation they shall attain his favour and for their pain receive reward at his hand in heaven. And for lack of knowledge of this end, they did, as they needs must, leave untouched also the very special means without which we can never attain to this comfort, which is the gracious aid and help of God to move, stir, and guide us forward in the referring of all our ghostly comfort—yea, and our worldly comfort too—all unto that heavenly end. And therefore, as I say, for the lack of these things, all their comforting counsels are very far insufficient.
However, for everything I've read in them, I've never found that those natural reasons were able to provide enough comfort on their own. They only go so far, leaving out, due to lack of necessary knowledge, the most important aspect that not only is the main source of comfort but without which all other comforts are meaningless. That aspect is to direct the ultimate purpose of their comfort to God and to see as the primary source of comfort that through patiently enduring their struggles, they will gain His favor and receive a reward from Him in heaven. Because they lack understanding of this purpose, they also necessarily overlook the very specific means by which we can achieve this comfort, which is the gracious help of God to inspire, motivate, and guide us in directing all our spiritual comforts—and even our worldly comforts—toward that heavenly goal. Therefore, as I mentioned, due to the absence of these things, all their comforting advice is quite inadequate.
Howbeit, though they be far unable to cure our disease of themselves and therefore are not sufficient to be taken for our physicians, some good drugs have they yet in their shops. They may therefore be suffered to dwell among our apothecaries, if their medicines be made not of their own brains but after the bills made by the great physician God, prescribing the medicines himself and correcting the faults of their erroneous recipes. For unless we take this way with them, they shall not fail to do as many bold blind apothecaries do who, either for lucre or out of a foolish pride, give sick folk medicines of their own devising. For therewith do they kill up in corners many such simple folk as they find so foolish as to put their lives in the hands of such ignorant and unlearned Blind Bayards.
However, even though they are completely unable to cure our ailments on their own and shouldn't be considered our doctors, they do have some useful drugs in their shops. Therefore, they can be allowed to stay among our pharmacists, as long as their medicines are not created from their own misguided ideas, but are instead based on the prescriptions made by the great physician God, who directs the remedies himself and corrects the errors in their flawed recipes. Because if we don't take this approach with them, they'll undoubtedly act like many reckless, uninformed pharmacists who, either for profit or out of foolish pride, give sick people treatments they've come up with themselves. As a result, they end up causing the deaths of many unsuspecting individuals who are foolish enough to trust their lives to such ignorant and untrained charlatans.
We shall therefore neither fully receive these philosophers' reasons in this matter, nor yet utterly refuse them. But, using them in such order as may beseem them, we shall fetch the principal and effectual medicines against these diseases of tribulation from that high, great, and excellent physician without whom we could never be healed of our very deadly disease of damnation. For our necessity in that regard, the Spirit of God spiritually speaketh of himself to us, and biddeth us give him the honour of all our health. And therein he thus saith unto us: "Honour thou the physician, for him hath the high God ordained for thy necessity." Therefore let us pray that high physician, our blessed Saviour Christ, whose holy manhood God ordained for our necessity, to cure our deadly wounds with the medicine made of the most wholesome blood of his own blessed body. And let us pray that, as he cured our mortal malady by this incomparable medicine, it may please him to send us and put in our minds at this time such medicines as may so comfort and strengthen us in his grace against the sickness and sorrows of tribulation, that our deadly enemy the devil may never have the power, by his poisoned dart of murmur, grudge, and impatience, to turn our short sickness of worldly tribulation into the endless everlasting death of infernal damnation.
We should not completely accept or entirely reject these philosophers' arguments on this issue. Instead, we will take their insights in a way that suits the situation and find the main and effective remedies for our problems from the ultimate, great, and excellent healer, without whom we could never be cured of our serious condition of condemnation. In our need for this, the Spirit of God communicates with us spiritually, urging us to give Him the honor for all our well-being. He tells us: "Honor the physician, for the Most High God has appointed him for your need." So, let’s pray to this great healer, our blessed Savior Christ, whose holy humanity God established for our necessity, to mend our serious wounds with the healing made from the most pure blood of His own blessed body. And let’s ask that, just as He healed our mortal illness with this unmatched remedy, He will provide us with the comfort and strength we need in His grace against the struggles and pains of this life, so that our deadly enemy, the devil, can never use his toxic arrows of complaint, resentment, and impatience to transform our brief suffering from worldly troubles into the eternal death of damnation.
II
Since all our principal comfort must come from God, we must first presuppose, in him to whom we shall give any effectual comfort with any ghostly counsel, one ground to begin with, on which all that we shall build may be supported and stand; that is, the ground and foundation of faith. Without this, had ready before, all the spiritual comfort that anyone may speak of can never avail a fly.
Since all our main comfort has to come from God, we need to first assume that the person we’re offering real comfort and spiritual advice to has a foundational support—specifically, a foundation of faith. Without this, all the spiritual comfort we could mention won’t be worth anything at all.
For just as it would be utterly vain to lay natural reasons of comfort to him who hath no wit, so would it undoubtedly be frustrate to lay spiritual causes of comfort to him who hath no faith. For unless a man first believe that holy scripture is the word of God, and that the word of God is true, how can he take any comfort in that which the scripture telleth him? A man must needs take little fruit of scripture, if he either believe not that it be the word of God, or else think that, though it were, it might yet for all that be untrue! As this faith is more strong or more faint, so shall the comforting words of holy scripture stand the man in more stead or less.
For just as it would be completely pointless to explain natural reasons for comfort to someone who lacks understanding, it would definitely be futile to offer spiritual reasons for comfort to someone who has no faith. Unless a person first believes that the holy scripture is the word of God and that the word of God is true, how can they find any comfort in what the scripture says? A person will gain little from scripture if they either don't believe it's the word of God or think that even if it is, it could still be false! The strength of this faith will determine how much the comforting words of holy scripture will help that person.
This virtue of faith can no man give himself, nor yet any man to another. But though men may with preaching be ministers unto God therein; and though a man can, with his own free will, obeying freely the inward inspiration of God, be a weak worker with almighty God therein; yet is the faith indeed the gracious gift of God himself. For, as St. James saith, "Every good gift and every perfect gift is given from above, descending from the Father of lights." Therefore, feeling our faith by many tokens very faint, let us pray to him who giveth it to us, that it may please him to help and increase it. And let us first say with him in the gospel, "I believe, good Lord, but help thou the lack of my belief." And afterwards, let us pray with the apostles, "Lord, increase our faith." And finally, let us consider, by Christ's saying unto them, that, if we would not suffer the strength and fervour of our faith to wax lukewarm—or rather key-cold—and lose its vigour by scattering our minds abroad about so many trifling things that we very seldom think of the matters of our faith, we should withdraw our thought from the respect and regard of all worldly fantasies, and so gather our faith together into a little narrow room. And like the little grain of mustard seed, which is by nature hot, we should set it in the garden of our soul, all weeds being pulled out for the better feeding of our faith. Then shall it grow, and so spread up in height that the birds—that is, the holy angels of heaven—shall breed in our soul, and bring forth virtues in the branches of our faith. And then, with the faithful trust that through the true belief of God's word we shall put in his promise, we shall be well able to command a great mountain of tribulation to void from the place where it stood in our heart, whereas with a very feeble faith and faint, we shall be scantly able to remove a little hillock.
This virtue of faith can't be given by anyone to themselves or to someone else. While people can act as ministers of God by preaching, and an individual can, through their free will, respond to God’s inner inspiration as a weak partner in this work, faith is ultimately a gracious gift from God himself. As St. James says, "Every good gift and every perfect gift is given from above, descending from the Father of lights." Therefore, recognizing that our faith often feels weak, let’s pray to the one who gives it to us, asking Him to help and strengthen it. First, let’s join in the words from the gospel: "I believe, good Lord, but help my lack of belief." Then, let’s pray with the apostles, "Lord, increase our faith." Finally, we should remember Christ’s words that if we don’t let the strength and fervor of our faith grow lukewarm—or even cold—and lose its power by getting distracted by trivial matters, we must shift our focus away from all worldly fantasies and gather our faith into a small, focused space. Just like a little mustard seed, which is naturally warm, we should plant it in the garden of our soul, pulling out all the weeds to nourish our faith. Then it will grow and expand high enough that the birds, representing the holy angels of heaven, will dwell in our soul and produce virtues from the branches of our faith. With strong trust in God’s promise through true belief in His word, we will be able to command a great mountain of trouble to leave our hearts, while a weak and faint faith will struggle to move even a small hill.
And therefore, as for the first conclusion, since we must of necessity before any spiritual comfort presuppose the foundation of faith, and since no man can give us faith but only God, let us never cease to call upon God for it.
And so, regarding the first conclusion, since we must necessarily have a foundation of faith before we can experience any spiritual comfort, and since no one can provide us with faith except God, let us always reach out to God for it.
VINCENT: Forsooth, good uncle, methinks that this foundation of faith which, as you say, must be laid first, is so necessarily requisite, that without it all spiritual comfort would be given utterly in vain. And therefore now shall we pray God for a full and fast faith. And I pray you, good uncle, proceed you farther in the process of your matter of spiritual comfort against tribulation.
VINCENT: Truly, dear uncle, I believe that this foundation of faith, which you say must be established first, is so essential that without it, all spiritual comfort would be completely useless. So now let’s pray to God for a strong and unwavering faith. And I ask you, dear uncle, to continue with your discussion on spiritual comfort in the face of tribulation.
ANTHONY: That shall I, cousin, with good will.
ANTHONY: I will do that, cousin, with pleasure.
III
I will in my poor mind assign, for the first comfort, the desire and longing to be comforted by God. And not without some reason call I this the first cause of comfort. For, as the cure of that person is in a manner desperate, who hath no will to be cured, so is the comfort of that person desperate, who desireth not his own comfort.
I will, in my limited understanding, identify the desire and yearning to be comforted by God as the primary source of comfort. And there is good reason for me to call this the first cause of comfort. For just as someone is in a hopeless situation if they have no desire to be healed, so too is the comfort of someone hopeless if they do not seek their own comfort.
And here shall I note you two kinds of folk who are in tribulation and heaviness: one sort that will not seek for comfort, and another sort that will.
And here I will point out two types of people who are experiencing trouble and sadness: one type that won’t look for comfort, and another type that will.
And again, of those that will not, there are also two sorts. For the first there are the sort who are so drowned in sorrow that they fall into a careless deadly dullness, regarding nothing, thinking almost of nothing, no more than if they lay in a lethargy. With them it may so befall that wit and remembrance will wear away and fall even fair from them. And this comfortless kind of heaviness in tribulation is the highest kind of the deadly sin of sloth.
And again, among those who won’t, there are also two types. First, there are those who are so overwhelmed by sadness that they fall into a numb, deadly dullness, ignoring everything and hardly thinking at all, as if they were in a deep sleep. For them, it could happen that their intelligence and memories fade away completely. This heavy, comforting type of sorrow during hard times is the worst form of the deadly sin of laziness.
Another sort there are, who will seek for no comfort, nor yet receive none, but in their tribulation (be it loss or sickness) are so testy, so fuming, and so far out of all patience that it profiteth no man to speak to them. And these are as furious with impatience as though they were in half a frenzy. And, from a custom of such behaviour, they may fall into one full and whole. And this kind of heaviness in tribulation is even a dangerous high branch of the mortal sin of ire.
Another type of person seeks no comfort and won’t accept any either. In their suffering—whether it’s due to loss or illness—they are so irritable, so angry, and so completely out of patience that it’s pointless to talk to them. They are as furious with impatience as if they were half-crazed. Because of this habitual behavior, they might eventually lose complete control. This kind of heaviness in suffering is a dangerously extreme form of the mortal sin of anger.
Then is there, as I told you, another kind of folk, who fain would be comforted. And yet are they of two sorts too. One sort are those who in their sorrow seek for worldly comfort. And of them shall we now speak the less, for the divers occasions that we shall afterwards have to touch upon them in more places than one. But here will I say this, which I learned of St. Bernard: He who in tribulation turneth himself unto worldly vanities, to get help and comfort from them, fareth like a man who in peril of drowning catcheth whatsoever cometh next to hand, and that holdeth he fast, be it never so simple a stick. But then that helpeth him not, for he draweth that stick down under the water with him, and there they lie both drowned together. So surely, if we accustom ourselves to put our trust of comfort in the delight of these childish worldly things, God shall for that foul fault suffer our tribulation to grow so great that all the pleasures of this world shall never bear us up, but all our childish pleasure shall drown with us in the depth of tribulation.
Then, as I mentioned, there are also people who really want to be comforted. However, they come in two types. One type seeks worldly comfort during their sorrow. We'll talk less about them now since we'll have more chances to address them later on. But I will say this, which I learned from St. Bernard: When someone in trouble turns to worldly distractions to find help and comfort, it's like a person who's about to drown grabbing onto whatever is nearby, even if it's just a flimsy stick. But that doesn’t help, because they just pull that stick down into the water with them, and both end up drowning. So, if we get used to relying on these trivial worldly pleasures for comfort, God will let our struggles become so overwhelming that no amount of worldly enjoyment will lift us up, and all our childish delights will drown with us in the depths of our troubles.
The other sort is, I say, of those who long and desire to be comforted by God. And as I told you before, they undoubtedly have a great cause of comfort even in that point alone, that they consider themselves to desire and long to be comforted by almighty God. This mind of theirs may well be cause of great comfort to them, for two great considerations.
The other type is, I say, those who crave and wish to be comforted by God. As I mentioned before, they definitely have a strong reason to feel comforted just by the fact that they recognize their desire to be comforted by Almighty God. This mindset can truly be a source of great comfort for them, for two significant reasons.
One is that they see themselves seek for their comfort where they cannot fail to find it. For God both can give them comfort, and will. He can, for he is all-mighty; he will, for he is all-good, and hath himself promised, "Ask and you shall have." He who hath faith—as he must needs have who shall take comfort—cannot doubt but what God will surely keep his promise. And therefore hath he a great cause to be of good comfort, as I say, in that he considereth that he longeth to be comforted by him who, his faith maketh him sure, will not fail to comfort him.
One reason is that they seek comfort in places where they know they can find it. God can offer them comfort, and He will do so. He can because He is all-powerful; He will because He is all-good and has promised, "Ask and you shall receive." Anyone with faith—something that is essential for finding comfort—cannot doubt that God will keep His promise. Therefore, they have every reason to be comforted, especially when they realize that they long to be comforted by someone who, their faith assures them, will not let them down.
But here consider this: I speak here of him who in tribulation longeth to be comforted by God, and who referreth the manner of his comforting to God. Such a man holdeth himself content, whether God comfort him by taking away or diminishing the tribulation itself, or by giving him patience and spiritual consolation therein. For if he long only to have God take his trouble from him, we cannot so well warrant that mind for a cause of so great comfort. For a man may desire that who never mindeth to be the better, and also may he miss the effect of his desire, because his request is haply not good for him. And of this kind of longing and requiring, we shall have occasion hereafter to speak further. But he who, referring the manner of his comforting to God, desireth of God to be comforted, asketh a thing so lawful and so pleasing to God that he cannot fail to fare well. And therefore hath he, as I say, great cause to take comfort in the very desire itself.
But consider this: I’m talking about someone who, in times of trouble, wants to be comforted by God and views the way they are comforted as coming from God. This person is satisfied whether God comforts them by removing or reducing their troubles, or by giving them patience and spiritual peace during those times. If someone only longs for God to take their troubles away, we can’t really say that mindset is a true source of comfort. A person can want that without a genuine intention to improve, and they might miss out on what they want because their request may not be good for them. We will discuss this kind of longing and wanting further on. But the person who, trusting God to decide how they will be comforted, asks to be comforted by Him is asking for something completely rightful and pleasing to God, so they can’t help but end up well. Therefore, they have every reason to find comfort in that very desire.
Another cause hath he to take of that desire a very great occasion of comfort. For since his desire is good, and declareth to him that he hath a good faith in God, it is a good token unto him that he is not an abject, cast out of God's gracious favour, since he perceiveth that God hath put such a virtuous, well-ordered appetite in his mind. For as every evil mind cometh of the world and ourselves and the devil, so is every such good mind inspired into man's heart, either immediately or by the mean of our good angel or other gracious occasion, by the goodness of God himself. And what a comfort then may this be to us, when we by that desire perceive a sure undoubted token that towards our final salvation our Saviour is himself so graciously busy about us!
Another reason he finds great comfort in that desire is that since it's a good desire, it shows he has faith in God. It's a good sign that he’s not rejected or cast out of God's favor because he sees that God has instilled such a virtuous, well-ordered craving in his mind. Just as every wicked thought comes from the world, ourselves, and the devil, every good thought is inspired in a person's heart, either directly or through our good angel or other gracious means, by God's own goodness. So, what comfort this brings us when we recognize that desire as a clear sign that our Savior is graciously concerned about our final salvation!
IV
VINCENT: Forsooth, good uncle, this good mind of longing for God's comfort is a good cause of great comfort indeed—our Lord in tribulation send it to us! But by this I see well, that woe may they be who in tribulation lack that mind and who desire not to be comforted by God, but either are of sloth or impatience discomfortless, or else of folly seek for their chief ease and comfort anywhere else.
VINCENT: Truly, dear uncle, this desire for God's comfort is a valid reason for great comfort indeed—may our Lord provide it to us in times of trouble! But I see clearly that those who lack this desire in their suffering, and who do not seek comfort from God, are truly unfortunate. Whether they are too lazy or impatient to find comfort, or whether they foolishly look for their main relief and comfort elsewhere.
ANTHONY: That is, good cousin, very true, as long as they stand in that state. But then you must consider that tribulation is a means to drive them from that state, and that is one of the causes for which God sendeth it unto man. For albeit that pain was ordained by God for the punishment of sins (so that they who never do now but sin cannot but be ever punished in hell) yet in this world, in which his high mercy giveth men space to be better, the punishment that he sendeth by tribulation serveth ordinarily for a means of amendment.
ANTHONY: That’s true, good cousin, as long as they stay that way. But you have to consider that hardship is a way to push them out of that state, and that’s one of the reasons God sends it to people. Even though pain was created by God as a punishment for sins (so those who only sin can expect to be punished in hell forever), in this world, where His great mercy gives people a chance to improve, the punishment He sends through hardship usually serves as a means of correction.
St. Paul himself was sorely against Christ, till Christ gave him a great fall and threw him to the ground, and struck him stark blind. And with that tribulation he turned to him at the first word, and God was his physician and healed him soon after both in body and in soul by his minister Ananias and made him his blessed apostle. Some are in the beginning of tribulation very stubborn and stiff against God, and yet at length tribulation bringeth them home. The proud king Pharaoh did abide and endure two or three of the first plagues, and would not once stoop at them. But then God laid on a sorer lash that made him cry to him for help. And then sent he for Moses and Aaron and confessed himself for a sinner and God for good and righteous. And he prayed them to pray for him and to withdraw that plague, and he would let them go. But when his tribulation was withdrawn, then was he wicked again. So was his tribulation occasion of his profit, and his help in turn was cause of his harm. For his tribulation made him call to God, and his help made hard his heart again. Many a man who in an easy tribulation falleth to seek his ease in the pastime of worldly fantasies, in a greater pain findeth all those comforts so feeble that he is fain to fall to the seeking of God's help.
St. Paul was completely opposed to Christ until Christ knocked him down and blinded him. In that moment of struggle, he turned to Christ after just one word, and God became his healer, restoring him both physically and spiritually through his minister Ananias, and made him a blessed apostle. Some people start off in hardship being very stubborn and resistant to God, but eventually, that hardship brings them back to Him. The proud King Pharaoh endured two or three of the first plagues without bending to them at all. But then God sent a harsher punishment that made him cry out for help. In that moment, he called for Moses and Aaron, admitted he was a sinner, and acknowledged God as good and just. He asked them to pray for him and to remove that plague, promising he would let them go. But once the hardship was lifted, he returned to his wicked ways. So, his suffering ended up benefiting him, and the help he received led to his downfall. His affliction made him call out to God, and the relief made his heart harden again. Many people who, when faced with minor difficulties, turn to worldly distractions for comfort, find those same comforts completely inadequate in the face of greater pain, forcing them to seek God's help instead.
And therefore is, I say, the very tribulation itself many times a means to bring the man to the taking of the aforementioned comfort therein—that is, to the desire of comfort given by God. For this desire of God's comfort is, as I have proved you, great cause of comfort itself.
And so, I say, the very struggle itself often becomes a way to lead a person to seek that comfort I mentioned earlier—that is, the comfort provided by God. For this desire for God's comfort is, as I've shown you, a major reason for experiencing comfort itself.
V
Howbeit, though the tribulation itself be a means oftentimes to get a man this first comfort in it, yet sometimes itself alone bringeth not a man to it. And therefore, since unless this comfort be had first, there can in tribulation no other good comfort come forth, we must consider the means by which this first comfort may come.
Howbeit, even though tribulation often helps a person find this first comfort, sometimes it alone doesn’t lead someone to it. Therefore, since this comfort needs to be experienced first for any other good comfort to emerge during tribulation, we must look at the ways this first comfort can be achieved.
Meseemeth that if the man of sloth or impatience or hope of worldly comfort have no mind to desire and seek for comfort of God, those who are his friends, who come to visit and comfort him, must before everything put that point in his mind, and not spend the time (as they commonly do) in trifling and in turning him to the fantasies of the world. They must also move him to pray God to put this desire in his mind. For when he once getteth it, he then hath the first comfort—and, without doubt, if it be well considered, a comfort marvellously great. His friends who thus counsel him must also, to the attaining thereof, help to pray for him themselves, and cause him to desire good folk to help him to pray for it. And then, if these ways be taken to get it, I doubt not but the goodness of God shall give it.
It seems to me that if a person is lazy, impatient, or only hopes for worldly comfort and doesn't want to seek God's comfort, his friends who come to visit and support him should first and foremost encourage him to think about this and not waste time (as they usually do) on trivial matters or getting caught up in the distractions of the world. They should also inspire him to pray to God to put this desire in his heart. Because once he truly feels it, he will experience the first comfort—and if you really think about it, it's an incredibly great comfort. His friends who advise him should also pray for him and encourage him to ask good people to pray for this as well. If these steps are taken to achieve it, I'm confident that God's goodness will provide it.
VI
VINCENT: Verily methinketh, good uncle, that this counsel is very good. For unless a person have first a desire to be comforted by God, I cannot see what it can avail to give him any further counsel of any spiritual comfort.
VINCENT: I truly believe, good uncle, that this advice is very good. For unless someone first has a desire to be comforted by God, I can't see how it would help to give them any further guidance on spiritual comfort.
Howbeit, what if the man have this desire of God's comfort: that is, that it may please God to comfort him in his tribulation by taking that tribulation from him—is not this a good desire of God's comfort, and a desire sufficient for him who is in tribulation?
However, what if the man has this desire for God's comfort: that is, he wants God to comfort him during his struggles by removing those struggles from him—isn't this a good desire for God's comfort, and a desire that is enough for someone who is suffering?
ANTHONY: No, cousin, that it is not. I touched before upon this point and passed it over, because I thought it would fall in our way again, and so know I well that it will, oftener than once. And now am I glad that you yourself move it to me here.
ANTHONY: No, cousin, that's not it. I've mentioned this before and skipped over it because I thought we'd come back to it, and I know we will, more than once. So I'm glad you brought it up with me here.
A man may many times, well and without sin, desire of God that the tribulation be taken from him. But neither may we desire that in every case, nor yet very well in any case (except very few) save under a certain condition, either expressed or implied. For tribulations are, as you know well, of many sundry kinds. Some are by loss of goods or possessions, some by the sickness of ourselves, and some by the loss of friends or by some other pain put unto our bodies. Some are by the dread of losing these things that we fain would save, under which fear fall all the same things that we have spoken of before. For we may fear loss of goods or possessions, or the loss of our friends, or their grief and trouble or our own by sickness, imprisonment, or other bodily pain. We may be troubled most of all with the fear of that thing which he feareth least of all who hath most need to do so—that is, the fear of losing through deadly sin the life of his blessed soul. And this last kind of tribulation, as the sorest tribulation of all, though we may touch some pieces of it here and there before, yet the chief part and the principal pain will I reserve to treat apart effectually at the end.
A man can often, justifiably and without sin, ask God to take away his troubles. However, we can't wish for this in every situation, and not very well in any situation (except for very few) unless it's under a specific condition, either stated or implied. For troubles, as you well know, come in many different forms. Some come from losing our belongings or possessions, some from our own sickness, and some from losing friends or experiencing other physical pain. Others arise from the fear of losing those things we desperately want to keep, which includes all the things we've mentioned before. We can fear losing our belongings, the loss of our friends, or their sorrow and pain, along with our own from illness, imprisonment, or other bodily suffering. We might be most troubled by the fear of that which is feared least by those who most need to worry about it—that is, the fear of losing the life of their blessed soul through deadly sin. And this last type of tribulation, being the worst of all, will be discussed in detail at the end, although we might touch on some aspects of it earlier.
But now, as I said, since the kinds of tribulation are so diverse, a man may pray God to take some of these tribulations from him, and may take some comfort in the trust that God will do so. And therefore against hunger, sickness, and bodily hurt, and against the loss of either body or soul, men may lawfully many times pray to the goodness of God, either for themselves or for their friends. And toward this purpose are expressly prayed many devout orisons in the common services of our mother Holy Church. And toward our help in some of these things serve some of the petitions in the Pater Noster, in which we pray daily for our daily food, and to be preserved from the fall into temptation, and to be delivered from evil.
But now, as I said, since there are so many different types of struggles, a person can ask God to take some of these burdens away and can find comfort in trusting that God will do so. Therefore, regarding hunger, illness, physical pain, and the loss of either body or soul, people can rightly pray to God's goodness, whether for themselves or for their friends. Many heartfelt prayers during the regular services of our mother Holy Church are specifically aimed at this purpose. Additionally, some of the requests in the Lord's Prayer help us with these matters, as we pray daily for our sustenance, to be kept from falling into temptation, and to be rescued from evil.
But yet may we not always pray for the taking away from us of every kind of temptation. For if a man should in every sickness pray for his health again, when should he show himself content to die and to depart unto God? And that mind must a man have, you know, or else it will not be well with him. It is a tribulation to good men to feel in themselves the conflict of the flesh against the soul and the rebellion of sensuality against the rule and governance of reason—the relics that remain in mankind of old original sin, of which St. Paul so sore complaineth in his epistle to the Romans. And yet may we not pray, while we stand in this life, to have this kind of tribulation utterly taken from us. For it is left us by God's ordinance to strive against it and fight with it, and by reason and grace to master it and use it for the matter of our merit.
But we can't always pray for all our temptations to be removed. If someone prayed for health every time they got sick, when would they accept dying and going to God? A person needs to have that mindset, or things won't go well for them. It's tough for good people to feel the struggle between their flesh and their soul and the way desire fights against reason and self-control—these are remnants of the original sin that St. Paul talks about in his letter to the Romans. Yet, we can't pray to have this kind of struggle completely taken away from us while we live in this life. It’s something God has allowed us to confront and battle, and through reason and grace, we can learn to master it and turn it into a source of our merit.
For the salvation of our soul may we boldly pray. For grace may we boldly pray, for faith, for hope, and for charity, and for every such virtue as shall serve us toward heaven. But as for all the other things before mentioned (in which is contained the matter of every kind of tribulation), we may never well make prayers so precisely but that we must express or imply a condition therein—that is, that if God see the contrary better for us, we refer it wholly to his will. And if that be so, we pray that God, instead of taking away our grief, may send us of his goodness either spiritual comfort to take it gladly or at least strength to bear it patiently.
For the salvation of our souls, let’s pray with confidence. Let’s pray for grace, for faith, for hope, for love, and for every other virtue that will help us reach heaven. But when it comes to all the other issues we've mentioned (which include all kinds of troubles), we should always make sure to include a condition in our prayers—that is, if God thinks something different is better for us, we completely submit to His will. And if that’s the case, we ask that instead of removing our pain, God may grant us, out of His goodness, either spiritual comfort to accept it gladly or at least the strength to endure it patiently.
For if we determine with ourselves that we will take no comfort in anything but the taking of our tribulation from us, then either we prescribe to God that he shall do us no better turn, even though he would, than we will ourselves appoint him; or else we declare that we ourselves can tell better than he what is better for us. And therefore, I say, let us in tribulation desire his help and comfort, and let us remit the manner of that comfort unto his own high pleasure. When we do this, let us nothing doubt but that, as his high wisdom better seeth what is best for us than we can see it ourselves, so shall his sovereign high goodness give us that thing that shall indeed be best.
For if we decide that we will find comfort only in having our troubles taken away, then we are either expecting God to do only what we want, even if He could do better, or we claim that we know better than He does about what is best for us. So, I say, in times of trouble, let us seek His help and comfort, and allow Him to decide how that comfort comes to us. When we do this, we can be sure that, since His infinite wisdom understands what is truly best for us better than we do, His supreme goodness will provide us with exactly what we need.
For otherwise, if we presume to stand to our own choice—unless God offer us the choice himself, as he did to David in the choice of his own punishment, after his high pride conceived in the numbering of the people—we may foolishly choose the worst. And by prescribing unto God ourselves so precisely what we will that he shall do for us, unless of his gracious favour he reject our folly, he shall for indignation grant us our own request, and afterward shall we well find that it shall turn us to harm.
For otherwise, if we think we can decide for ourselves—unless God offers us the choice himself, like he did for David when he had to pick his own punishment after his arrogance in counting the people—we might foolishly choose what’s worst. And if we dictate to God exactly what we want him to do for us, unless he kindly ignores our foolishness, he might angrily give us what we asked for, and later we will realize that it ends up causing us harm.
How many men attain health of body for whom it would be better, for their soul's health, that their bodies were sick still? How many get out of prison who happen outside on such harm as the prison would have kept them from? How many who have been loth to lose their worldly goods have, in keeping of their goods, soon afterward lost their life? So blind is our mortality and so unaware what will befall—so unsure also what manner of mind we ourselves will have tomorrow—that God could not lightly do a man more vengeance than to grant him in this world his own foolish wishes.
How many men achieve good health that would actually be better off for their soul’s well-being if their bodies were still sick? How many escape prison only to encounter dangers that the prison would have protected them from? How many who were reluctant to lose their worldly possessions ended up losing their lives shortly after clinging to those possessions? Our mortality is so blind and we are so unaware of what will happen—so uncertain also about what kind of mindset we will have tomorrow—that it would be a cruel fate for God to grant a man his foolish desires in this world.
What wit have we poor fools to know what will serve us? For the blessed apostle himself in his sore tribulation, praying thrice unto God to take it away from him, was answered again by God (in a manner) that he was but a fool in asking that request, but that the help of God's grace in that tribulation to strengthen him was far better for him than to take that tribulation from him. And therefore, perceiving well by experience the truth of the lesson, he giveth us good warning not to be too bold of our minds, when we require aught of God, at his own pleasure. For his own Holy Spirit so sore desireth our welfare that, as men say, he groaneth for us, in such wise as no tongue can tell. "What we may pray for, that would be behovable for us, we cannot ourselves tell," saith St. Paul, "but the Spirit himself desireth for us with unspeakable groanings."
What wisdom do we, poor fools, have to know what will truly benefit us? Even the blessed apostle, in his deep distress, prayed three times to God to take it away from him, but God answered him in a way that showed he was foolish for making that request. Instead, God’s grace to strengthen him in that hardship was far better than removing the trouble. Therefore, having learned this truth from experience, he warns us not to be too confident in what we ask of God at his own discretion. His Holy Spirit desires our well-being so intensely that, as people say, he groans for us in ways that words cannot express. "What we should pray for that would truly help us, we can't determine ourselves," says St. Paul, "but the Spirit himself desires for us with unspeakable groanings."
And therefore I say, for conclusion of this point, let us never ask of God precisely our own ease by delivery from our tribulation, but pray for his aid and comfort by such ways as he himself shall best like, and then may we take comfort even of our such request. For we may be sure that this mind cometh of God. And also we may be very sure that as he beginneth to work with us, so—unless we ourselves fly from him—he will not fail to tarry with us. And then, if he dwell with us, what trouble can do us harm? "If God be with us," saith St. Paul, "who can stand against us?"
And so I say, to wrap up this point, let's never ask God only for our own comfort by being free from our struggles, but instead pray for His help and comfort in whatever way He sees fit. Then we can find comfort even in that request. We can be sure that this attitude comes from God. Also, we can be very sure that as He starts to work with us, unless we turn away from Him, He won’t fail to stay with us. And if He is with us, what trouble can truly harm us? "If God is with us," says St. Paul, "who can stand against us?"
VII
VINCENT: You have, good uncle, well opened and declared the question that I demanded you—that is, what manner of comfort a man might pray for in tribulation. And now proceed forth, good uncle, and show us yet farther some other spiritual comfort in tribulation.
VINCENT: You have, good uncle, clearly explained the question I asked you—specifically, what kind of comfort a person might seek in times of trouble. Now, please continue, good uncle, and share with us more about other forms of spiritual comfort during tribulation.
ANTHONY: This may be, methinketh, good cousin, great comfort in tribulation: that every tribulation which any time falleth unto us is either sent to be medicinable, if men will so take it; or may become medicinable, if men will so make it; or is better than medicinable, unless we will forsake it.
ANTHONY: I think, good cousin, this may offer great comfort in tough times: every hardship that comes our way is either sent to be healing if we choose to see it that way; can become healing if we decide to make it so; or is better than healing, unless we choose to abandon it.
VINCENT: Surely this is very comforting—if we can well perceive it!
VINCENT: This is definitely reassuring—if we can truly understand it!
ANTHONY: There three things that I tell you, we shall consider thus: Every tribulation that we fall in, either cometh by our own known deserving deed bringing us to it, as the sickness that followeth our intemperate surfeit or the imprisonment or other punishment put upon a man for his heinous crime; or else it is sent us by God without any certain deserving cause open and known to ourselves, either for punishment of some sins past (we know not certainly which) or for preserving us from sin in which we would otherwise be like to fall; or finally it is not due to the man's sin at all but is for the proof of his patience and increase of his merit. In all the former cases tribulation is, if we will, medicinable. In this last case of all, it is better than medicinable.
ANTHONY: There are three things I want to talk about. We should consider them this way: Every hardship we go through either comes from something we did that we know led us to it, like getting sick because we overindulged, or it could be punishment like imprisonment for a serious crime; or it comes from God without any clear reason we can understand, either as a punishment for past sins (which we might not know specifically) or to protect us from sin that we might otherwise fall into; or finally, it could be completely unrelated to our sins and is meant to test our patience and increase our merit. In all the first cases, hardships can be treated if we want them to be. In this last case, they are even more than just treatable.
VIII
VINCENT: This seemeth to me very good, good uncle, save that it seemeth somewhat brief and short, and thereby methinketh somewhat obscure and dark.
VINCENT: This seems really good to me, good uncle, but it feels a bit brief and short, which makes it seem somewhat obscure and unclear.
ANTHONY: We shall therefore, to give it light withal, touch upon every member of it somewhat more at large.
ANTHONY: So, to shed some light on it, we will discuss each member in a bit more detail.
One member is, as you know, of them that fall in tribulation through their own certain well-deserving deed, open and known to themselves, as when we fall in a sickness following upon our own gluttonous feasting, or when a man is punished for his own open fault. These tribulations, and others like them, may seem not to be comfortable, in that a man may be sorry to think himself the cause of his own harm. Yet hath he good cause of comfort in them, if he consider that he may make them medicinable for himself if he will. For whereas there was due to that sin, unless it were purged here, a far greater punishment after this world in another place, this worldly tribulation of pain and punishment, by God's good provision for him put upon him here in this world before, shall by the mean of Christ's passion, if the man will in true faith and good hope by meek and patience sufferance of his tribulation so make it, serve him for a sure medicine to cure him. And it shall clearly discharge him of all the sickness and disease of those pains that he should otherwise suffer afterward. For such is the great goodness of almighty God that he punisheth not the same thing twice.
One member is, as you know, among those who experience hardship due to their own actions, which they recognize, like when we get sick after overindulging at a feast or when someone is punished for their obvious mistakes. These hardships, and others like them, might not seem comforting, as one might regret being the cause of their own suffering. However, there is a good reason to feel at ease about them if one considers that they can turn these experiences into something beneficial for themselves if they choose to. Since there would have been a much greater punishment due for that sin after this life unless it was dealt with here, this worldly suffering and punishment, which God has kindly allowed in this life, can, through Christ's suffering, serve as a sure remedy for anyone who, with true faith and hope, endures their tribulations with humility and patience. It will clear them of all the pain and suffering they would have otherwise faced later. Such is the great goodness of Almighty God that He does not punish the same sin twice.
And albeit that this punishment is put unto the man, not of his own election and free choice but by force, so that he would fain avoid it and falleth in it against his will, and therefore it seemeth worthy of no thanks; yet the great goodness of almighty God so far surpasseth the poor imperfect goodness of man, that though men make their reckoning here one with another such, God yet of his high bounty in man's account alloweth it toward him far otherwise. For though a man fall in his pain by his own fault, and also at first against his will, yet as soon as he confesseth his fault and applieth his will to be content to suffer that pain and punishment for the same, and waxeth sorry not only that he shall sustain such punishment but also that he hath offended God and thereby deserved much more, our Lord from that time counteth it not for pain taken against his will. But it shall be a marvellous good medicine, and work as a willingly taken pain the purgation and cleansing of his soul with gracious remission of his sin, and of the far greater pain that otherwise would have been prepared for it, peradventure forever in hell. For many there are undoubtedly who would otherwise drive forth and die in their deadly sin, who yet in such tribulation, feeling their own frailty so effectually and the false flattering world failing them, turn full goodly to God and call for mercy. And so by grace they make virtue of necessity, and make a medicine of their malady, taking their trouble meekly, and make a right godly end.
And even though this punishment is imposed on a person not by their own choice but by force, so that they would like to avoid it and fall into it against their will, and therefore it seems unworthy of thanks; yet the immense goodness of Almighty God far exceeds the limited goodness of humans. While people might judge one another’s actions this way, God chooses to view it much differently in His generosity. For even if someone suffers due to their own fault and initially against their will, as soon as they acknowledge their fault and willingly accept the suffering and punishment that comes with it—and feel sorrow not only for enduring such punishment but also for offending God and deserving much more—our Lord no longer considers it pain taken against their will. Instead, it becomes an excellent remedy, serving as a willingly accepted pain that purifies and cleanses their soul while graciously forgiving their sin, and shielding them from the far greater pain that would have awaited them, potentially forever in hell. Indeed, there are many who would otherwise continue in their deadly sin, yet in such tribulation, realizing their own weakness and finding the false, flattering world failing them, turn sincerely to God and seek His mercy. Thus, by grace, they turn necessity into virtue, transforming their suffering into a remedy, accepting their troubles humbly, and ultimately achieving a truly godly end.
Consider well the story of Acham, who committed sacrilege at the great city of Jericho. Thereupon God took a great vengeance upon the children of Israel, and afterward told them the cause and bade them go seek the fault and try it out by lots. When the lot fell upon the very man who did it—being tried by the lot falling first upon his tribe and then upon his family and then upon his house and finally upon his person—he could well see that he was deprehended and taken against his will. But yet at the good exhortation of Josue saying unto him, "Mine own son, give glory to the God of Israel, and confess and show me what thou hast done, and hide it not," he confessed humbly the theft and meekly took his death for it. And he had, I doubt not, both strength and comfort in his pain, and died a very good man. Yet, if he had never come in tribulation, he would have been in peril never haply to have had just remorse in all his whole life, but might have died wretchedly and gone to the devil eternally. And thus made this thief a good medicine of his well-deserved pain and tribulation.
Consider the story of Acham, who committed sacrilege in the great city of Jericho. Because of this, God took great vengeance on the children of Israel and later revealed to them the reason, instructing them to find the guilty party by casting lots. When the lot fell on the very man who committed the act—first pointing to his tribe, then his family, then his household, and finally to him—it was clear he was caught against his will. However, encouraged by Josue’s words, "My son, give glory to the God of Israel, confess and tell me what you’ve done, and don’t hide it," he humbly admitted to the theft and accepted his punishment. I have no doubt he found both strength and comfort in his suffering and died a good man. Yet, had he never faced this tribulation, he might never have felt the genuine remorse needed in his life, potentially dying wretchedly and facing eternal doom. In this way, the thief's well-deserved suffering became a necessary medicine for his soul.
Consider well the converted thief who hung on Christ's right hand. Did not he, by his meek sufference and humble knowledge of his fault, asking forgiveness of God and yet content to suffer for his sin, make of his just punishment and well-deserved tribulation a very good special medicine to cure him of all pain in the other world, and win him eternal salvation?
Consider the converted thief who hung on Christ's right hand. Didn’t he, through his quiet suffering and humble acknowledgment of his fault, asking for God’s forgiveness while accepting his punishment, turn his deserved suffering and pain into a powerful remedy to relieve him of all torment in the afterlife, ultimately securing his eternal salvation?
And thus I say that this kind of tribulation, though it seem the most base and the least comfortable, is yet, if the man will so make it, a very marvellous wholesome medicine. And it may therefore be, to the man who will so consider it, a great cause of comfort and spiritual consolation.
And so I say that this type of struggle, although it seems the most trivial and least pleasant, is still, if a person chooses to see it that way, a truly remarkable and beneficial remedy. Therefore, it can be, for those who choose to reflect on it, a significant source of comfort and spiritual support.
IX
VINCENT: Verily, mine uncle, this first kind of tribulation have you to my mind opened sufficiently. And therefore, I pray you, resort now to the second.
VINCENT: Truly, my uncle, you have opened up this first kind of trouble enough in my mind. So, I ask you to move on to the second now.
ANTHONY: The second kind, you know, was of such tribulation as is so sent us by God that we know no certain cause deserving that present trouble, as we certainly know that upon such-and-such a surfeit we fell in such-and-such a sickness, or as the thief knoweth that for a certain theft he is fallen into a certain punishment. But yet, since we seldom lack faults against God worthy and well-deserving of great punishment, indeed we may well think—and wisdom it is to do so—that with sin we have deserved it and that God for some sin sendeth it, though we know not certainly for which. And therefore thus far is this kind of tribulation somewhat in effect to be taken alike unto the other. For you see, if we thus will take it, reckoning it to be sent for sin and suffering it meekly therefor, it is medicinable against the pain of the other world to come for our past sins in this world, And this is, as I have showed you, a cause of right great comfort.
ANTHONY: The second type, you know, is the kind of suffering that comes from God, where we can't pinpoint a specific reason for our current troubles, unlike how we know that a certain indulgence led to a specific illness, or how a thief knows he’s facing punishment for a particular crime. However, since we rarely lack flaws against God that are deserving of serious punishment, we might reasonably think—and it’s wise to do so—that our sins have earned this suffering, and that God sends it for some sin, even if we're not sure which one. Therefore, this type of suffering can be somewhat treated the same as the other. You see, if we accept it this way, believing it’s sent because of our sins and handling it with humility, it can serve as a remedy for the pain of the next world as atonement for our past sins in this one. And this, as I've explained, is a significant source of comfort.
But yet may then this kind of tribulation be, to some men of more sober living and thereby of more clear conscience, somewhat a little more comfortable. They may none otherwise reckon themselves than sinners, for, as St. Paul saith, "My conscience grudgeth me not of anything, but yet am I not thereby justified," and, as St. John saith, "If we say that we have no sin in us, we beguile ourselves and truth is there not in us." Yet, forasmuch as the cause is to them not so certain as it is to the others afore-mentioned in the first kind, and forasmuch as it is also certain that God sometimes sendeth tribulation to keep and preserve a man from such sin as he would otherwise fall in (and sometimes also for exercise of their patience and increase of merit), great cause of increase in comfort have those folk of the clearer conscience in the fervour of their tribulation. For they may take the comfort of a double medicine, and also of that thing that is of the kind that we shall finally speak of, that I call "better than medicinable."
But this kind of trouble can be, for some people who live more soberly and therefore have a clearer conscience, a little more bearable. They can only see themselves as sinners, because, as St. Paul says, "My conscience doesn’t accuse me of anything, but I’m not justified by that." And as St. John says, "If we claim we have no sin, we’re fooling ourselves, and the truth isn’t in us." However, since their situation isn’t as clear to them as it is to those mentioned earlier, and it’s also true that God sometimes sends trouble to keep someone from falling into sin (and sometimes to test their patience and increase their merits), those with a clearer conscience have a good reason to feel more comforted during their struggles. They receive the comfort of a double remedy, and also from something I’ll refer to later as "better than medicinal."
But as I have before spoken of this kind of tribulation—how it is medicinable in that it cureth the sin past and purchaseth remission of the pain due for it—so let us somewhat consider how this tribulation sent us by God is medicinable in that it preserveth us from the sins into which we would otherwise be like to fall. If that thing be a good medicine that restoreth us our health when we lose it, as good a medicine must this one be that preserveth our health while we have it, and suffereth us not to fall into that painful sickness that must afterward drive us to a painful remedy! Now God seeth sometimes that worldly wealth is coming so fast upon someone (who nevertheless is good) that, foreseeing how much weight of worldly wealth the man may bear and how much will overcharge him and enhance his heart up so high that grace should fall from him, God of his goodness, I say, doth anticipate his fall, and sendeth him tribulation betimes while he is yet good. And this he doth to make him know his maker and, by less liking the false flattering world, to set a cross upon the ship of his heart and bear a low sail thereon, so that the boisterous blast of pride blow him not under the water.
But as I've mentioned before about this kind of suffering—how it can heal past sins and earn forgiveness for the pain due to them—let's consider how this suffering sent by God is also healing in that it protects us from the sins we might otherwise fall into. If something is a good medicine that restores our health when we lose it, then it must also be a good medicine if it protects our health while we have it and prevents us from falling into that painful condition that would later force us to endure a painful remedy! Sometimes God sees that someone (who is still good) is being overwhelmed by worldly wealth. Knowing how much weight of worldly wealth a person can handle and how much will burden him, causing him to lose grace, God, in His goodness, anticipates this fall and sends him suffering early while he is still good. He does this to help him recognize his creator and, by being less attracted to the deceptive and flattering world, to create a barrier in his heart and keep a low profile so that the strong winds of pride don’t drag him under.
Some lovely young lady, lo, who is yet good enough—God seeth a storm come toward her that would, if her health and fat feeding should last a little longer, strike her into some lecherous love and, instead of her old-acquainted knight, lay her abed with a new-acquainted knave. But God, loving her more tenderly than to suffer her to fall into such shameful beastly sin, sendeth her in season a goodly fair fervent fever, that maketh her bones to rattle and wasteth away her wanton flesh. And it beautifieth her fair skin with the colour of a kite's claw, and maketh her look so lovely that her love would have little pleasure to look upon her. And it maketh her also so lusty that if her lover lay in her lap she should so sore long to throw up unto him the very bottom of her stomach that she should not be able to restrain it from him, but suddenly lay it all in his neck!
Some lovely young lady, who is still good enough—God sees a storm approaching her that would, if her health and plumpness lasted a little longer, lead her into some reckless love and, instead of her familiar knight, put her in bed with a new rogue. But God, loving her more deeply than to allow her to fall into such shameful and beastly sin, sends her a strong fever in due time, making her bones rattle and wasting away her indulgent flesh. It gives her skin the color of a hawk's claw and makes her look so unattractive that her lover would find little pleasure in looking at her. It also makes her so restless that if her lover were in her lap, she would long to throw up everything in her stomach that she wouldn't be able to hold it back, but would suddenly spill it all over him!
Did not, as I before told you, the blessed apostle himself confess that the high revelations that God had given him might have enhanced him into so high a pride that he might have caught a foul fall, had not the provident goodness of God provided for his remedy? And what was his remedy but a painful tribulation, so sore that he was fain thrice to call to God to take the tribulation from him. And yet would not God grant his request, but let him lie therein till he himself, who saw more in St. Paul than St. Paul saw in himself, knew well the time was come in which he might well without his harm take it from him.
Didn’t I tell you before that the blessed apostle himself admitted that the great revelations God gave him could have filled him with such pride that he might have fallen hard, if not for God’s careful kindness taking care of him? And what was his solution but a painful suffering, so intense that he begged God three times to remove it from him. Yet God didn’t grant his request, allowing him to endure it until the moment came when God, who understood St. Paul better than St. Paul understood himself, knew it was safe to relieve him of it.
And thus you see, good cousin, that tribulation is double medicine—both a cure of the sin past, and a preservative from the sin that is to come. And therefore in this kind of tribulation is there good occasion for a double comfort; but that is, I say, diversely to sundry diverse folk, as their own conscience is cumbered with sin or clear. Howbeit, I will advise no man to be so bold as to think that his tribulation is sent him to keep him from the pride of his holiness! Let men leave that kind of comfort hardly to St. Paul, till their living be like his. But of the rest men may well take great comfort and good besides.
And so you see, dear cousin, that struggle serves two purposes—it’s a remedy for past sins and a shield against future ones. Therefore, in this form of struggle, there’s a good opportunity for double comfort; however, I mean that differently for different people, depending on whether their conscience is burdened with sin or clear. Still, I wouldn’t advise anyone to be so bold as to think their struggles are meant to keep them humble about their own holiness! Let people reserve that kind of comfort for St. Paul, until their lives resemble his. But for everyone else, they can definitely find great comfort and benefits.
X
VINCENT: The third kind of tribulation, uncle, remaineth now—that is, that which is sent a man by God, and not for his sin either committed or which otherwise would come, and therefore is not medicinable, but is sent for exercise of our patience and increase of our merit, and therefore better than medicinable. Though it be, as you say (and as indeed it is) better for the man than any of the other two kinds in another world, where the reward shall be received, yet I cannot see by what reason a man can in this world, where the tribulation is suffered, take any more comfort in it than in any of the other twain that are sent him for his sin. For he cannot here know whether it be sent him for sin before committed, or for sin that otherwise should befall, or for increase of merit and reward after to come. For every man hath cause enough to fear and think that his sin already past hath deserved it, and that it is not without peril for a man to think otherwise.
VINCENT: The third type of suffering, uncle, is now what remains—that is, the kind that comes from God, not due to any sins a person has committed or will commit, and therefore it can't be treated like the others. It's meant to test our patience and increase our worthiness, making it ultimately more beneficial than those that can be treated. Although, as you mention (and it's true), it might be better for a person in the afterlife, where the reward will be given, I still don’t see how someone in this world, where they are enduring the suffering, could find any more comfort in it than in the other two types that are a result of their sins. After all, they can't know whether it's due to sins they've already committed, sins that could happen, or for gaining merit and rewards in the future. Everyone has enough reason to fear and think that their past sins have caused it, and it’s risky for someone to think otherwise.
ANTHONY: This that you say, cousin, hath place of truth in far the most part of men. And therefore must they not envy nor disdain, since they may take in their tribulation sufficient consolation for their part, that some other who is more worthy may take yet a great deal more. For, as I told you, cousin, though the best must confess himself a sinner, yet there are many men—though to the multitude, few—who for the kind of their living and the clearness of their conscience may well and without sin have a good hope that God sendeth them some great grief for the exercise of their patience and for increase of their merit. This appeareth not only by St. Paul, in the place before remembered, but also by the holy man Job, who in sundry places of his disputations with his burdensome comforters forbore not to say that the clearness of his own conscience declared and showed to himself that he deserved not that sore tribulation that he then had. Howbeit, as I told you before, I will not advise every man at adventure to be bold upon this manner of comfort. But yet know I some men such that I would dare, for their more ease and comfort in their great and grievous pains, to put them in right good hope that God sendeth it unto them not so much for their punishment as for exercise of their patience.
ANTHONY: What you’re saying, cousin, is true for most people. So, they shouldn’t be envious or disdainful, since they can find enough consolation in their struggles knowing that someone more deserving might suffer even more. As I mentioned, cousin, although even the best must admit their sins, there are many men—though few in the grand scheme—who, based on their way of living and the purity of their conscience, can hope without sin that God has given them some significant hardship to test their patience and increase their worth. This is shown not only by St. Paul in the previously mentioned passage but also by the holy man Job, who, in many of his discussions with his troublesome comforters, didn’t hesitate to say that the clarity of his own conscience proved he didn’t deserve the severe trials he was facing. However, as I told you before, I wouldn’t recommend that everyone boldly take this kind of comfort on a whim. Yet, I do know some men whom I would encourage, for their comfort amid great suffering, to hold onto the hope that God is not punishing them, but rather testing their patience.
And some tribulations are there, also, that grow upon such causes that in those cases I would never forbear but always would, without any doubt, give that counsel and comfort to any man.
And there are also some challenges that arise from such reasons that in those situations, I would never hold back and would always, without any doubt, offer that advice and support to anyone.
VINCENT: What causes, good uncle, are those?
VINCENT: What are those causes, good uncle?
ANTHONY: Marry, cousin, wheresoever a man falleth in tribulation for the maintenance of justice or for the defence of God's cause. For if I should happen to find a man who had long lived a very virtuous life, and had at last happened to fall into the Turks' hands; and if he there did abide by the truth of his faith and, with the suffering of all kinds of torments taken upon his body, still did teach and testify the truth; and if I should in his passion give him spiritual comfort—might I be bold to tell him no further but that he should take patience in his pain, and that God sendeth it to him for his sin, and that he is well worthy to have it, though it were yet much more? He might then well answer me, and other such comforters, as Job answered his: "Burdensome and heavy comforters be you." Nay, I would not fail to bid him boldly, while I should see him in his passion, to cast sin and hell and purgatory and all upon the devil's pate, and doubt not but—as, if he gave over his hold, all his merit would be lost and he would be turned to misery—so if he stand and persevere still in the confession of his faith, all his whole pain shall turn all into glory.
ANTHONY: Look, cousin, wherever a person struggles to uphold justice or defend God's cause, it's significant. If I were to meet a man who lived a virtuous life but then fell into the hands of the Turks, and if he remained true to his faith despite enduring all kinds of torture and continued to teach and testify to the truth, and if I were to offer him spiritual comfort in his suffering—could I really just tell him to be patient, that God is sending him this pain for his sins, and that he truly deserves it, even if it were much worse? He could easily respond to me, just like Job responded to his comforters: "You're giving me heavy burdens instead of real comfort." No, I would encourage him, as I saw him in his suffering, to cast aside sin, hell, and purgatory and throw it all at the devil, and not doubt that—just as losing his grip would mean losing all his merit and descending into misery—if he stands firm and perseveres in his faith, then all his pain will turn into glory.
Yea, more shall I yet say than this. If there were a Christian man who had among those infidels committed a very deadly crime, such as would be worthy of death, not only by their laws but by Christ's too (as manslaughter, or adultery, or other such thing); and if when he were taken he were offered pardon of his life upon condition that he should forsake the faith of Christ; and if this man would now rather suffer death than so do—should I comfort him in his pain only as I would a malefactor? Nay, this man, though he would have died for his sin, dieth now for Christ's sake, since he might live still if he would forsake him. The bare patient taking of his death would have served for the satisfaction of his sin—through the merit of Christ's passion, I mean, without help of which no pain of our own could be satisfactory. But now shall Christ, for his forsaking of his own life in the honour of his faith, forgive the pain of all his sins, of his mere liberality, and accept all the pain of his death for merit of reward in heaven, and shall assign no part of it to the payment of his debt in purgatory, but shall take it all as an offering and requite it all with glory. And this man among Christian men, although he had been before a devil, nothing would I doubt afterward to take him for a martyr.
Yeah, I have more to say than this. If there was a Christian man who committed a very serious crime among those nonbelievers, such as something deserving of death, not only by their laws but by Christ's as well (like manslaughter or adultery or similar offenses); and if, when he was caught, he was offered a chance to save his life on the condition that he renounce his faith in Christ; and if this man would rather face death than do that—should I comfort him in his suffering just like I would a criminal? No, this man, even though he would have died for his sins, is now dying for Christ's sake, since he could still live if he chose to abandon Him. Simply accepting his death would have been enough to satisfy his sins—through the merit of Christ's suffering, I mean, since without that, no pain of our own could be satisfactory. But now Christ, because of his willingness to give up his life in honor of his faith, will forgive all his sins out of sheer generosity, accept all the pain of his death as a worthy sacrifice for reward in heaven, and will not assign any part of it to settle his debts in purgatory, but will accept it all as an offering and give him glory in return. And this man among Christians, even if he was previously seen as a sinner, I would have no doubt in considering him a martyr afterward.
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, methinketh this is said marvellous well. And it specially delighteth and comforteth me to hear it, because of our principal fear that I first spoke of, the Turk's cruel incursion into this country of ours.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, I think this is said very well. And it especially delights and comforts me to hear it, because of our main fear that I mentioned earlier, the Turk's brutal invasion of our country.
ANTHONY: Cousin, as for the matter of that fear, I purpose to touch it last of all. Nor meant I here to speak of it, had it not been that the vehemency of your objection brought it in my way. But otherwise I would rather have put instead some example of those who suffer tribulation for maintenance of right and justice, and choose rather to take harm than to do wrong in any manner of matter. For surely if a man may—as indeed he may—have great comfort in the clearness of his conscience, who hath a false crime put upon him and by false witness proved upon him, and who is falsely punished and put to worldly shame and pain for it; a hundred times more comfort may he have in his heart who, where white is called black and right is called wrong, abideth by the truth and is persecuted for justice.
ANTHONY: Cousin, regarding that fear, I plan to address it last. I didn’t mean to bring it up here, but your strong objection made it unavoidable. Otherwise, I would have preferred to share examples of those who endure hardship to uphold what’s right and just, and who choose to suffer rather than do wrong in any way. Surely, if a person can— as they truly can—find great comfort in knowing their conscience is clear, even when falsely accused and wronged by false witnesses, then a hundred times more comfort can be found by someone who, when white is called black and right is called wrong, stands by the truth and is persecuted for justice.
VINCENT: Then if a man sue me wrongfully for my own land, in which I myself have good right, it is a comfort yet to defend it well, since God shall give me thanks for it?
VINCENT: Then if a man wrongfully sues me for my own land, which I have a rightful claim to, it's still comforting to defend it well, knowing that God will appreciate my efforts?
ANTHONY: Nay nay, cousin, nay, there walk you somewhat wide. For there you defend your own right for your temporal avail. But St. Paul counseleth, "Defend not yourselves, my more dear friends," and our Saviour counseleth, "If a man will strive with thee at the law and take away thy coat, leave him thy gown too." The defence therefore of our own right asketh no reward. Say you speed well, if you get leave; look hardly for no thanks!
ANTHONY: No, no, cousin, you're missing the point. You're arguing for your own benefit. But St. Paul advises, "Don't defend yourselves, my dear friends," and our Savior teaches, "If someone wants to sue you and take your coat, give him your shirt as well." Therefore, defending our own rights doesn’t require any reward. You might get your way if you get permission, but don't expect any thanks!
But on the other hand, if you do as St. Paul biddeth, "Seek not for your own profit but for other folk's" and defend therefore of pity a poor widow or a poor fatherless child, and rather suffer sorrow by some strong extortioner than suffer them to take wrong; or if you be a judge and have such zeal to justice that you will abide tribulation by the malice of some mighty man rather than judge wrong for his favour—such tribulations, lo, are those that are better than only medicinable. And every man upon whom they fall may be bold so to reckon them, and in his deep trouble may well say to himself the words that Christ hath taught him for his comfort, "Blessed be the merciful men, for they shall have mercy given them. Blessed be they that suffer persecution for justice, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
But on the flip side, if you do what St. Paul advises, "Don’t seek your own gain but look out for others," and out of compassion stand up for a poor widow or an orphaned child, and if you choose to endure hardship from a powerful oppressor instead of letting them be wronged; or if you’re a judge and have such a passion for justice that you will face hardship from a powerful person rather than deliver an unfair judgment for their benefit—these struggles are indeed better than just being a cure for wounds. And anyone who faces them can confidently think of them this way, and in their deep troubles, they can remember the words Christ has given them for comfort: "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy. Blessed are those who are persecuted for justice, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
Here is a high comfort, lo, for those that are in this case. And their own conscience can show it to them, and can fill their hearts so full with spiritual joy that the pleasure may far surmount the heaviness and grief of all their temporal trouble. But God's nearer cause of faith against the Turks hath yet a far surpassing comfort that by many degrees far excelleth this. And that, as I have said, I purpose to treat last. And for this time this sufficeth concerning the special comfort that men may take in this third kind of tribulation.
Here is a great source of comfort for those in this situation. Their own conscience can reveal it to them and can fill their hearts with such spiritual joy that this pleasure can far outweigh the heaviness and grief of all their earthly troubles. However, God's closer reason for faith against the Turks offers an even greater comfort that greatly exceeds this. As I’ve mentioned, I plan to address that last. For now, this is enough regarding the specific comfort that people can find in this third type of suffering.
XI
VINCENT: Of truth, good uncle, albeit that every one of these kinds of tribulations have cause of comfort in them, as you have well declared, if men will so consider them, yet hath this third kind above all a special prerogative therein.
VINCENT: Honestly, good uncle, while it's true that each of these kinds of troubles has a reason for comfort, as you’ve nicely explained, this third kind, more than the others, has a unique advantage in it.
ANTHONY: That is undoubtedly true. But yet even the most base kind of them all, good cousin, hath more causes of comfort than I have spoken of yet.
ANTHONY: That is definitely true. But even the worst of them all, good cousin, has more reasons to find comfort than I've mentioned so far.
For I have, you know, in that kind that is sent us for our sin, spoken of no other comfort yet but twain: one that it refraineth us from sin that otherwise we would fall in; and one that it serveth us, through the merit of Christ's passion, as a means by which God keepeth us from hell and serveth for the satisfaction of such pain as we should otherwise endure in purgatory. Howbeit, there is therein another great cause of joy besides this. For surely those pains here sent us for our sin, in whatsoever wise they happen to us (be our sin never so sore nor never so open and evident unto ourselves and all the world too), yet if we pray for grace to take them meekly and patiently; and if, confessing to God that it is far too little for our fault, we beseech him nevertheless, since we shall come hence so void of all good works for which we should have any reward in heaven, to be not only so merciful to us as to take our present tribulation in relief of our pains in purgatory, but also so gracious unto us as to take our patience therein for a matter of merit and reward in heaven; I verily trust—and nothing doubt it—that God shall of his high bounty grant us our boon.
For I have, you know, spoken of no other comfort yet but two: one that keeps us from sin that we would otherwise fall into, and one that serves us, through the merit of Christ's passion, as a way for God to keep us from hell and to satisfy the pain we would otherwise face in purgatory. However, there’s another great reason for joy besides this. For surely, those pains sent to us for our sins, no matter how they come (no matter how serious or obvious our sins are to ourselves and everyone else), if we pray for the grace to accept them humbly and patiently; and if, while confessing to God that it is far too little for our faults, we still ask Him, since we will leave this life with no good works to earn any reward in heaven, to be merciful enough to use our current tribulations to ease our pains in purgatory, and also to be gracious enough to consider our patience in these sufferings as something to earn merit and reward in heaven; I truly believe—and have no doubt—that God will generously grant our request.
For as in hell pain serveth only for punishment without any manner of purging, because all possibility of purging is past; and as in purgatory punishment serveth only for purging, because the place of deserving is past; so while we are yet in this world in which is our place and our time of merit and well-deserving, the tribulation that is sent us for our sin here shall, if we faithfully so desire, beside the cleansing and purging of our pain, serve us also for increase of reward. And so shall, I suppose and trust in God's goodness, all such penance and good works as a man willingly performeth, enjoined by his ghostly father in confession, or which he willingly further doth of his own devotion beside. For though man's penance, with all the good works that he can do, be not able to satisfy of themselves for the least sin that we do, yet the liberal goodness of God, through the merit of Christ's bitter passion—without which all our works could never satisfy so much as a spoonful to a great vesselful in comparison with the merit and satisfaction that Christ has merited and satisfied for us himself—this liberal goodness of God, I say, shall yet at our faithful instance and request cause our penance and tribulation patiently taken in this world to serve us in the other world both for release and reward, tempered after such rate as his high goodness and wisdom shall see best for us, whereof our blind mortality cannot here imagine nor devise the stint.
For in hell, pain exists only for punishment without any chance of being cleansed, since all possibilities for that are gone; and in purgatory, punishment exists only for the purpose of cleansing, because the time for deserving is over. So, while we are still in this world, which is our opportunity for merit and good deeds, the suffering we experience for our sins here can, if we genuinely desire it, not only help to cleanse and purge us but also increase our rewards. I believe and trust in God’s goodness that all acts of penance and good works that someone willingly performs, whether assigned by their spiritual advisor in confession or done out of their own devotion, will contribute to this. Although a person’s penance, along with all the good deeds they can do, cannot, on their own, satisfy even the smallest sin, God’s generous goodness will, through the merit of Christ’s painful suffering—without which none of our works could satisfy even a tiny amount compared to the merit and satisfaction that Christ has achieved for us—result in our penance and patiently endured suffering in this world contributing to our release and reward in the next. This will be determined by what His supreme goodness and wisdom see as best for us, which our limited human understanding cannot fully grasp or imagine here.
And thus hath yet even the first and most base kind of tribulation, though not fully so great as the second and very far less than the third, far greater cause of comfort yet than I spoke of before.
And so, even the first and simplest kind of hardship, although not as significant as the second and much less than the third, still offers a much greater source of comfort than I mentioned earlier.
XII
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, this pleaseth me very well. But yet are there, you know, some of these things now brought in question. For as for any pain due for our sin, to be diminished in purgatory by the patient sufferance of tribulation here, there are, you know, many who utterly deny that, and affirm for a sure truth that there is no purgatory at all. And then, if they say true, is the cause of the comfort gone, if the comfort that we should take be but in vain and needless.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, this pleases me a lot. But there are, you know, some of these things that are being questioned. As for any suffering we face for our sins being lessened in purgatory by patiently enduring troubles here, many totally deny that and assert with certainty that there is no purgatory at all. If they are correct, then the reason for our comfort disappears, since the comfort we seek would be pointless and unnecessary.
They say, you know, also that men merit nothing at all, but God giveth all for faith alone, and that it would be sin and sacrilege to look for reward in heaven either for our patience and glad suffering for God's sake, or for any other good deed. And then is there gone, if this be thus, the other cause of our further comfort too.
They say, you know, that men deserve nothing at all, but God gives everything based on faith alone, and that it would be wrong and disrespectful to expect any reward in heaven for our patience and joyful suffering for God’s sake, or for any other good deed. And if this is true, then we lose another source of our comfort too.
ANTHONY: Cousin, if some things were as they be not, then should some things be as they shall not! I cannot indeed deny that some men have of late brought up some such opinions, and many more than these besides, and have spread them abroad. And it is a right heavy thing to see such variousness in our belief rise and grow among ourselves, to the great encouragement of the common enemies of us all, whereby they have our faith in derision and catch hope to overwhelm us all. Yet do three things not a little comfort my mind. The first is that, in some communications had of late together, there hath appeared good likelihood of some good agreement to grow together in one accord of our faith. The second is that in the meanwhile, till this may come to pass, contentions, disputations, and uncharitable behaviour are prohibited and forbidden in effect upon all parties—all such parties, I mean, as fell before to fight for it. The third is that in Germany, for all their diverse opinions, yet as they agree together in profession of Christ's name, so agree they now together in preparation of a common power, in defence of Christendom against our common enemy the Turk. And I trust in God that this shall not only help us here to strengthen us in this war, but also that, as God hath caused them to agree together in the defence of his name, so shall he graciously bring them to agree together in the truth of his faith. Therefore will I let God work, and leave off contention. And I shall now say nothing but that with which they who are themselves of the contrary mind shall in reason have no cause to be discontented.
ANTHONY: Cousin, if some things were different from how they are, then some things would be different from what they will be! I can't deny that some people have recently raised such opinions, and many more beyond those, and have spread them around. It’s truly disheartening to see such a variety of beliefs emerging and growing among us, which greatly encourages our common enemies, who mock our faith and hope to overpower us all. However, three things bring me some comfort. First, in recent discussions, there have been signs of a good chance for us to come together in unity of faith. Second, until that becomes a reality, all parties—those who previously engaged in disputes—are effectively prohibited from fighting over it. Third, in Germany, despite their differing opinions, they unite in proclaiming Christ's name and are now preparing a joint effort to defend Christendom against our common enemy, the Turk. I trust in God that this will not only strengthen us here in this conflict but also, as He has united them in defending His name, He will graciously bring them together in the truth of His faith. Therefore, I will let God work and stop the contention. I will now say nothing that those with opposing views could reasonably find discontenting.
First, as for purgatory: Though they think there be none, yet since they deny not that all the corps of Christendom for so many hundred years have believed the contrary, and among them all the old interpreters of scripture from the apostles' days down to our time, many of whom they deny not for holy saints, these men must, of their courtesy, hold my poor fear excused, that I dare not now believe them against all those. And I beseech our Lord heartily for them, that when they depart out of this wretched world, they find no purgatory at all—provided God keep them from hell!
First, regarding purgatory: Even though they believe it doesn’t exist, they can’t ignore the fact that the entire Christian community has believed the opposite for so many centuries. This includes all the early interpreters of scripture from the time of the apostles to now, many of whom they don’t dispute as holy saints. These individuals should kindly understand my fear, as I am hesitant to go against all those beliefs. And I sincerely pray to our Lord for them, that when they leave this troubled world, they find no purgatory at all—assuming God keeps them away from hell!
As for the merit of man in his good works, neither are those who deny it fully agreed among themselves, nor is there any man almost of them all that, since they began to write, hath not somewhat changed and varied from himself. And far the more part are thus far agreed with us: Like as we grant them that no good work is worth aught toward heaven without faith; and that no good work of man is rewardable in heaven of its own nature, but through the mere goodness of God, who is pleased to put so high a price upon so poor a thing; and that this price God setteth through Christ's passion, and also because they are his own works with us (for no man worketh good works toward God unless God work with him); and as we grant them also that no man may be proud of his works for his own imperfect working, because in all that he may do he can do God no good, but is an unprofitable servant, and doth but his bare duty—as we, I say, grant them these things, so this one thing or twain do they grant us in turn: That men are bound to work good works if they have time and power, and that whosoever worketh in true faith most, shall be most rewarded. But then they add to this that all his reward shall be given him for his faith alone and nothing for his works at all, because his faith is the thing, they say, that forceth him to work well. I will not strive with them for this matter now. But yet I trust to the great goodness of God, that if the question hang on that narrow point, since Christ saith in the scripture in so many places that men shall in heaven be rewarded for their works, he shall never suffer our souls—who are but mean-witted men and can understand his words only as he himself hath set them and as old holy saints have construed them before and as all Christian people this thousand year have believed—to be damned for lack of perceiving such a sharp subtle thing. Especially since some men who have right good wits, and are beside that right well learned, too, can in no wise perceive for what cause or why these folk who take away the reward from good works and give that reward all whole to faith alone, give the reward to faith rather than to charity. For this grant they themselves, that faith serveth of nothing unless she be accompanied by her sister charity. And then saith the scripture, too, "Of these three virtues, faith, hope, and charity, of all these three, the greatest is charity." And therefore it seemeth as worthy to have the thanks as faith. Howbeit, as I said, I will not strive for it, nor indeed as our matter standeth I shall not greatly need to do so. For if they say that he who suffereth tribulation and martyrdom for the faith shall have high reward, not for his work but for his well-working faith, yet since they grant that have it he shall, the cause of high comfort in the third kind of tribulation standeth. And that is, you know, the effect of all my purpose.
As for how valuable a person's good deeds are, those who deny it don't even agree with each other, and almost none of them have remained the same since they started writing. Most of them do agree with us on this: We acknowledge that no good deed counts for anything in terms of reaching heaven without faith; that no good deed done by a person is rewarded in heaven simply for being good, but rather through God's kindness, who chooses to assign such great value to something so insignificant; and that this value is established through Christ's suffering and also because these works are done in conjunction with God (since no one can do good works toward God unless God works with them); and, as we also agree that no one should feel proud of their deeds due to their own shortcomings, because whatever they do does not benefit God—they are merely serving their duty. While we acknowledge these points, they in turn concede a couple of things to us: that people are obligated to do good works if they have the time and ability, and that whoever acts in true faith will be the most rewarded. However, they add that all rewards will be granted based solely on faith, with no recognition for their works at all, claiming that faith is what drives people to do good. I won’t argue that point with them right now. Still, I trust in God's immense goodness that if the debate hinges on this fine detail, since Christ clearly states in Scripture that people will be rewarded in heaven for their works, He will not allow us—who are just ordinary people, limited in our understanding of His words as they have been expressed and interpreted by holy saints and believed by Christians for over a thousand years—to be condemned for failing to grasp such a complex issue. Especially since even some very intelligent and well-educated individuals struggle to understand why those who deny the reward for good deeds choose to attribute all rewards to faith alone. They also acknowledge that faith is useless unless it’s accompanied by its sister, charity. The Scriptures also say, "Of these three virtues, faith, hope, and charity, the greatest is charity." Therefore, it seems equally deserving of thanks as faith. However, like I mentioned, I won’t push the issue, nor will I really need to, given the current situation. For even if they claim that someone who endures hardship and martyrdom for their faith will be highly rewarded—not for their deeds but for their sincere faith—the fact that they acknowledge this reward exists still provides significant comfort amid suffering. And that is, as you know, the main point of my argument.
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, this is truly driven and tried unto the uttermost, it seemeth to me. And therefore I pray you proceed at your leisure.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, this has been pushed to the very limit, it seems to me. So, I kindly ask you to continue at your own pace.
XIII
ANTHONY: Cousin, it would be a long work to peruse every comfort that a man may well take in tribulation. For as many comforts, you know, may a man take thereof, as there be good commodities therein. And of those there are surely so many that it would be very long to rehearse and treat of them. But meseemeth we cannot lightly better perceive what profit and commodity, and thereby what comfort, they may take of it who have it, than if we well consider what harm the lack of it is, and thereby what discomfort the lack should be to them that never have it.
ANTHONY: Cousin, it would take a long time to go through every comfort that someone can find in tough times. For every comfort a person can take from it, there are as many benefits as there are good things in it. And there are definitely so many benefits that it would take quite a while to list and discuss them all. However, I think we can better understand the value and benefits—and, consequently, the comfort they provide—by really considering the harm that comes from lacking them, and how much discomfort this lack would cause to those who have never experienced it.
So is it now that all holy men agree, and all the scripture is full, and our own experience proveth before our eyes, that we are not come into this wretched world to dwell here. We have not, as St. Paul saith, our dwelling-city here, but we are seeking for the city that is to come. And St. Paul telleth us that we do seek for it, because he would put us in mind that we should seek for it, as good folk who fain would come thither. For surely whosoever setteth so little by it that he careth not to seek for it, it will I fear be long ere he come to it, and marvellous great grace if ever he come thither. "Run," saith St. Paul, "so that you may get it." If it must then be gotten with running, when shall he come at it who lifteth not one step toward it?
So now it’s clear that all holy people agree, all the scriptures confirm it, and our own experiences show us that we didn’t come into this miserable world to stay here. As St. Paul says, we don’t have our permanent home here; we’re looking for the city that is to come. And St. Paul reminds us that we should be seeking it like good people who really want to get there. For anyone who values it so little that they don’t even bother to seek it out, I fear it will be a long time before they reach it, and it would be an incredible grace if they ever do get there. “Run,” says St. Paul, “so that you may win it.” If it must be won by running, how will someone get there if they don’t even take a single step toward it?
Now, because this world is, as I tell you, not our eternal dwelling, but our little-while wandering, God would that we should use it as folk who were weary of it. And he would that we should in this vale of labour, toil, tears, and misery not look for rest and ease, game, pleasure, wealth, and felicity. For those who do so fare like a foolish fellow who, going towards his own house where he should be wealthy, would for a tapster's pleasure become a hostler by the way, and die in a stable, and never come home.
Now, since this world is, as I tell you, not our permanent home, but a temporary journey, God wants us to treat it like people who are tired of it. He wants us to understand that in this life of hard work, struggle, tears, and suffering, we shouldn’t expect comfort, fun, pleasure, wealth, and happiness. Those who do act like a foolish person who, on their way back to their own home where they would be wealthy, stops to enjoy a drink and ends up becoming a stable worker, dying in that stable, never making it home.
And would God that those that drown themselves in the desire of this world's wretched wealth, were not yet more fools than he! But alas, their folly as far surpasseth the foolishness of that silly fellow as there is difference between the height of heaven and the very depth of hell. For our Saviour saith, "Woe may you be that laugh now, for you shall wail and weep." And "There is a time of weeping," saith the scripture, "and there is a time of laughing." But, as you see, he setteth the weeping time before, for that is the time of this wretched world, and the laughing time shall come after in heaven. There is also a time of sowing and a time of reaping, too. Now must we in this world sow, that we may in the other world reap. And in this short sowing time of this weeping world, must we water our seed with the showers of our tears. And then shall we have in heaven a merry laughing harvest forever. "They went forth and sowed their seeds weeping," saith the prophet. But what, saith he, shall follow thereof? "They shall come again more than laughing, with great joy and exultation, with their handfuls of corn in their hands." Lo, they that in their going home towards heaven sow their seeds with weeping, shall at the day of judgment come to their bodies again with everlasting plentiful laughing. And to prove that this life is no laughing time, but rather the time of weeping, we find that our Saviour himself wept twice or thrice, but never find we that he laughed so much as once. I will not swear that he never did, but at least he left us no example of it. But on the other hand, he left us example of weeping.
And I wish that those who drown themselves in the pursuit of this world’s miserable wealth were not even bigger fools than him! But sadly, their foolishness far exceeds that of that silly guy, just as there’s a huge difference between the heights of heaven and the depths of hell. Our Savior said, “Woe to you who laugh now, for you will wail and weep.” And “There is a time to weep,” says the scripture, “and a time to laugh.” But, as you can see, he sets the weeping time first, because that’s the reality of this miserable world, and the laughing time will come later in heaven. There is also a time for sowing and a time for reaping. We must sow in this world so we can reap in the next. In this brief time of sowing in this weeping world, we must water our seeds with our tears. Then we will have a joyful, laughing harvest forever in heaven. “They went out and sowed their seeds with weeping,” says the prophet. But what does he say will follow? “They shall return with joy, bringing in their sheaves.” Look, those who sow their seeds with tears on their journey home to heaven will rise on judgment day with everlasting joy. And to show that this life is not a time for laughter but rather a time for weeping, we see that our Savior himself wept two or three times, but we never find that he laughed even once. I won’t claim that he never did, but at the very least, he didn’t leave us any record of it. However, he did leave us an example of weeping.
Of weeping have we matter enough, both for our own sins and for other folk's, too. For surely so should we do—bewail their wretched sins, and not be glad to detract them nor envy them either. Alas, poor souls, what cause is there to envy them who are ever wealthy in this world, and ever out of tribulation? Of them Job saith, "They lead all their days in wealth, and in a moment of an hour descend into their graves and are painfully buried in hell." St. Paul saith unto the Hebrews that those whom God loveth he chastiseth, "And he scourgeth every son of his that he receiveth." St. Paul saith also, "By many tribulations must we go into the kingdom of God." And no marvel, for our Saviour Christ said of himself unto his two disciples that were going into the village of Emaus, "Know you not that Christ must suffer and so go into his kingdom?" And would we who are servants look for more privilege in our master's house than our master himself? Would we get into his kingdom with ease, when he himself got not into his own but by pain? His kingdom hath he ordained for his disciples, and he saith unto us all, "If any man will be my disciple, let him learn of me to do as I have done, take his cross of tribulation upon his back and follow me." He saith not here, lo, "Let him laugh and make merry." Now if heaven serve but for Christ's disciples, and if they be those who take their cross of tribulation, when shall these folk come there who never have tribulation? And if it be true, as St. Paul saith, that God chastiseth all them that he loveth and scourgeth every child whom he receiveth, and that to heaven shall not come but such as he loveth and receiveth, when shall they come thither whom he never chastiseth, nor never doth vouchsafe to defile his hands upon them or give them so much as one lash? And if we cannot (as St. Paul saith we cannot) come to heaven but by many tribulations, how shall they come thither who never have none at all? Thus see we well, by the very scripture itself, how true the words are of old holy saints, who with one voice (in a manner) say all one thing—that is, that we shall not have continual wealth both in this world and in the other too. And therefore those who in this world without any tribulation enjoy their long continual course of never-interrupted prosperity have a great cause of fear and discomfort lest they be far fallen out of God's favour, and stand deep in his indignation and displeasure. For he never sendeth them tribulation, which he is ever wont to send them whom he loveth. But they that are in tribulation, I say, have on the other hand a great cause to take in their grief great inward comfort and spiritual consolation.
We certainly have enough to cry about, both for our own mistakes and for others’ as well. We should mourn their terrible sins, instead of being glad to criticize or envy them. Oh, poor souls, why should we envy those who are always rich in this world and never seem to suffer? Job says about them, “They spend their days in wealth, and in an instant, they die and are buried in hell.” St. Paul tells the Hebrews that those whom God loves, He disciplines, “And He punishes every son He accepts.” St. Paul also says, “We must go through many hardships to enter the kingdom of God.” It’s no surprise, because our Savior Christ told His two disciples on the way to the village of Emaus, “Don’t you know that Christ must suffer before entering His kingdom?” Should we, as servants, expect more privileges in our master’s house than our master himself? Should we expect to enter His kingdom effortlessly when He Himself didn’t do so without suffering? His kingdom is prepared for His disciples, and He tells us all, “If anyone wants to be my disciple, let them learn from me to do as I have done, take their cross of suffering upon themselves and follow me.” He doesn’t say, “Let them laugh and have a good time.” Now, if heaven is meant only for Christ's disciples, and those are the ones who take up their cross of suffering, when will those who never face hardship get there? And if it’s true, as St. Paul says, that God disciplines all He loves and punishes every child He accepts, and that only those He loves and accepts will enter heaven, when will those who are never disciplined or even touched by hardship arrive? If we cannot (as St. Paul says) reach heaven except through many trials, how will those who never experience any get there? Thus, we can clearly see, based on scripture itself, how true the words of the old saints are, who almost unanimously say that we cannot have constant wealth both in this life and the next. Therefore, those who enjoy uninterrupted prosperity in this world without any trials should be very worried and uneasy, as they may be far from God’s favor and deeply in His anger and displeasure. For He never sends them trials, which He usually sends to those He loves. But those who are facing tribulation, I say, have great reasons to find deep comfort and spiritual consolation in their grief.
XIV
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, this seemeth so indeed. Howbeit, yet methinketh that you say very sore in some things concerning such persons as are in continual prosperity. And they are, you know, not a few; and they are also those who have the rule and authority of this world in their hand. And I know well that when they talk with such great learned men as can, I suppose, tell the truth; and when they ask them whether, while they make merry here in earth all their lives, they may not yet for all that have heaven afterwards too; they do tell them "Yes, yes," well enough. For I have heard them tell them so myself.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, this does seem to be the case. However, I think you are being quite harsh about some things regarding those who are always prosperous. And there are, you know, quite a few of them; they are also the ones who hold power and authority in this world. I'm sure that when they speak with highly educated individuals who can, I believe, speak the truth, and when they ask them whether they can enjoy their lives here on Earth and still have heaven afterward, they are told, “Yes, yes,” quite comfortably. Because I have heard them say it myself.
ANTHONY: I suppose, good cousin, that no very wise man, and especially none that is also very good, will tell any man fully of that fashion. But surely such as so say to them, I fear me that they flatter them thus either for lucre or for fear.
ANTHONY: I guess, good cousin, that no truly wise person, especially one who is also genuinely good, would fully explain that style to anyone. But surely those who do speak to them, I’m afraid, flatter them either for gain or out of fear.
Some of them think, peradventure, thus: "This man maketh much of me now, and giveth me money also to fast and watch and pray for him. But so, I fear me, would he do no more, if I should go tell him now that all that I do for him will not serve him unless he go fast and watch and pray for himself too. And if I should add thereto and say further that I trust my diligent intercession for him may be the means that God should the sooner give him grace to amend, and fast and watch and pray and take affliction in his own body, for the bettering of his sinful soul, he would be wonderous wroth with that. For he would be loth to have any such grace at all as should make him go leave off any of his mirth, and so sit and mourn for his sin." Such mind as this, lo, have some of those who are not unlearned, and have worldly wit at will, who tell great men such tales as perilously beguile them. For the flatterer who so telleth them would, if he told a true tale, jeopard to lose his lucre.
Some of them think, perhaps, like this: "This guy is treating me well now and even giving me money to fast, watch, and pray for him. But I worry that he wouldn't be so generous if I told him that everything I'm doing for him won’t really help unless he fasts, watches, and prays for himself too. And if I were to add that I believe my earnest prayers might be a way for God to give him the grace to improve and to fast, watch, and pray, while also accepting suffering in his own body to better his sinful soul, he would be really angry about that. He wouldn’t want any grace that would make him stop enjoying himself and instead sit around feeling sorry for his sins." This kind of thinking, you see, is held by some who aren’t ignorant and have plenty of worldly wisdom, who tell powerful people stories that dangerously mislead them. Because the flatterer who tells them such things would risk losing his profit if he spoke the truth.
Some are there also who tell them such tales for consideration of another fear. For seeing the man so sore set on his pleasure that they despair of any amendment of his, whatsoever they should say to him; and then seeing also that the man doth no great harm, but of a courteous nature doth some good men some good; they pray God themselves to send him grace. And so they let him lie lame still in his fleshly lusts, at the pool that the gospel speaketh of, beside the temple, in which they washed the sheep for the sacrifice, and they tarry to see the water stirred. And when his good angel, coming from God, shall once begin to stir the water of his heart, and move him to the lowly meekness of a simple sheep, then if he call them to him they will tell him another tale, and help to bear him and plunge him into the pool of penance over the hard ears! But in the meanwhile, for fear lest if he would wax never the better he would wax much the worse; and from gentle, smooth, sweet, and courteous, might wax angry, rough, froward, and sour, and thereupon be troublous and tedious to the world to make fair weather with; they give him fair words for the while and put him in good comfort, and let him for the rest take his own chance.
Some people also share stories with him out of concern for another fear. They see that he is so focused on his own pleasure that they doubt he will ever change, no matter what they say. They notice that he doesn’t cause much harm, and he actually does some good for decent folks, so they pray to God for his grace. They leave him stuck in his desires, by the pool that the gospel mentions, next to the temple where they washed the sheep for sacrifice, waiting to see the water stirred. When his good angel, sent by God, finally begins to stir the waters of his heart and inspires him to be as humble and gentle as a simple sheep, if he calls for them, they will share another story and help lift him up and immerse him in the waters of repentance against his stubbornness! But for now, they're scared that if he doesn't improve, he might worsen; that from being kind, pleasant, sweet, and courteous, he could become angry, rough, difficult, and unpleasant, making him a burden to the world. So they give him kind words for the time being, keep him cheerful, and let him deal with his fate.
And so deal they with him as the mother doth sometimes with her child, when the little boy will not rise in time for her, but will lie slug-abed, and when he is up weepeth because he has lain so long, fearing to be beaten at school for his late coming thither. She telleth him then that it is but early days, and he shall come in time enough, and she biddeth him, "Go, good son. I warrant thee, I have sent to thy master myself. Take thy bread and butter with thee—thou shalt not be beaten at all!" And thus, if she can but send him merry forth at the door, so that he weep not in her sight at home, she careth not much if he be taken tardy and beaten when he cometh to school.
And so they deal with him like a mother does with her child when the little boy won’t get out of bed in the morning. When he finally wakes up, he cries because he’s afraid he’ll get in trouble for being late to school. She tells him it’s still early and that he’ll get there in time. She encourages him, saying, “Go on, my good son. Don’t worry, I’ve already talked to your teacher myself. Take your bread and butter with you—you won’t get in trouble at all!” And this way, as long as she can send him off happily at the door and doesn’t have to see him cry at home, she doesn’t really mind if he ends up being late and punished when he gets to school.
Surely thus, I fear me, fare many friars and state's chaplains too, in giving comfort to great men when they are both loth to displease them. I cannot commend their doing thus, but surely I fear me thus they do.
Surely, I fear that many friars and state chaplains do the same, offering comfort to powerful people while being reluctant to upset them. I can’t support their actions, but I truly worry that this is what they do.
XV
VINCENT: But, good uncle, though some do thus, this answereth not the full matter. For we see that the whole church in the common service uses divers collects in which all men pray, specially for the princes and prelates, and generally every man for others and for himself too, that God would vouchsafe to send them all perpetual health and prosperity. And I can see no good man praying God to send another sorrow, nor are there such prayers put in the priests' breviaries, as far as I can hear. And yet if it were as you say, good uncle, that perpetual prosperity were so perilous to the soul, and tribulation also so fruitful, then meseemeth every man would be bound of charity not only to pray God send his neighbour sorrow, but also to help thereto himself. And when folk were sick, they would be bound not to pray God send them health, but when they came to comfort them, they should say, "I am glad, good friend, that you are so sick—I pray God keep you long therein!" And neither should any man give any medicine to another nor take any medicine himself neither. For by the diminishing of the tribulation he taketh away part of the profit from his soul, which can with no bodily profit be sufficiently recompensed.
VINCENT: But, good uncle, even though some people think that way, it doesn’t address the whole issue. We see that the entire church in the common service uses various prayers where everyone prays, especially for the rulers and leaders, and generally for each other and themselves too, asking God to grant them all lasting health and prosperity. I can’t imagine a good person praying for God to bring someone else sorrow, nor are there any such prayers in the priests' prayer books, as far as I know. And yet, if what you say is true, good uncle, that lasting prosperity is so dangerous to the soul, and that suffering is so beneficial, then it seems to me that everyone would be obligated out of kindness not only to pray for God to bring sorrow to their neighbors but also to contribute to it themselves. And when people were sick, they would be bound not to pray for God to give them health; instead, when they went to comfort them, they would say, "I’m glad, my good friend, that you’re so sick—I pray God keeps you in this condition for a long time!" Moreover, no one should give medicine to another or take any themselves. Because by easing someone’s suffering, they would be taking away part of the benefit to their soul, which cannot be sufficiently compensated by any physical gain.
And also this you know well, good uncle, that we read in holy scripture of men that were wealthy and rich and yet were good withal. Solomon was, you know, the richest and most wealthy king that any man could in his time tell of, and yet was he well beloved with God. Job also was no beggar, perdy, nor no wretch otherwise. Nor did he lose his riches and his wealth because God would not that his friend should have wealth, but rather for the show of his patience, to the increase of his merit and the confusion of the devil. And, for proof that prosperity may stand with God's favour, "God restored Job double of all" that ever he lost, and gave him afterward long life to take his pleasure long. Abraham was also, you know, a man of great substance, and so continued all his life in honour and wealth. Yea, and when he died, too, he went unto such wealth that when Lazarus died in tribulation and poverty, the best place that he came to was that rich man's bosom!
And you also know this well, good uncle, that we read in the holy scripture about men who were wealthy and rich yet still good. Solomon, as you know, was the richest and most prosperous king anyone could talk about in his time, and he was beloved by God. Job was also not a beggar, that's for sure, nor was he a wretch in any way. He didn’t lose his riches and wealth because God didn’t want his friend to have wealth, but rather to demonstrate his patience, increase his merit, and confound the devil. And to prove that prosperity can exist alongside God's favor, "God restored Job double of all" that he ever lost and gave him a long life to enjoy it. Abraham was also a man of great wealth, and he maintained his honor and riches all his life. Even when he died, he went on to such wealth that when Lazarus died in suffering and poverty, the best place he arrived at was in the bosom of that rich man!
Finally, good uncle, this we find before our eyes, and every day we prove it by plain experience that many a man is right wealthy and yet therewith right good, and many a miserable wretch is as evil as he is wretched. And therefore it seemeth hard, good uncle, that between prosperity and tribulation the matter should go thus, that tribulation should be given always by God to those that he loveth, for a sign of salvation, and prosperity sent for displeasure, as a token of eternal damnation.
Finally, good uncle, this is what we see before us, and every day we confirm it through clear experience: many people are quite wealthy and also quite good, while many miserable individuals are as wicked as they are unfortunate. Therefore, it seems unfair, good uncle, that between success and suffering, things should be this way, with suffering always given by God to those He loves as a sign of salvation, while success is sent with disapproval as a sign of eternal damnation.
XVI
ANTHONY: I said not, cousin, that for an undoubted rule, worldly prosperity were always displeasing to God or tribulation evermore wholesome to every man—or else I meant not to say it. For well I know that our Lord giveth in this world unto either sort of folk either sort of fortune. "He maketh his sun to shine both upon the good and the bad, and his rain to fall both on the just and on the unjust." And on the other hand, "he scourgeth every son that he receiveth," yet he beateth not only good folk that he loveth, but "there are many scourges for sinners" also. He giveth evil folk good fortune in this world to call them by kindness—and, if they thereby come not, the more is their unkindness. And yet where wealth will not bring them, he giveth them sometimes sorrow. And some who in prosperity cannot creep forward to God, in tribulation they run toward him apace. "Their infirmities were multiplied," saith the prophet, "and after that they made haste." To some that are good men, God sendeth wealth here also; and they give him great thanks for his gift, and he rewardeth them for the thanks too. To some good folk he sendeth sorrow, and they thank him for that too. If God should give the goods of this world only to evil folk, then would men think that God were not the Lord thereof. If God would give the goods only to good men, then would folk take occasion to serve him but for them. Some will in wealth fall into folly: "When man was in honour, his understanding failed him; then was he compared with beasts and made like unto them." Some men with tribulation will fall into sin, and therefore saith the prophet, "God will not leave the rod of the wicked men upon the lot of righteous men, lest the righteous peradventure extend and stretch out their hands to iniquity." So I deny not that either state, wealth or tribulation, may be matter of virtue and matter of vice also.
ANTHONY: I didn't mean to say, cousin, that for sure worldly success is always displeasing to God or that suffering is always good for everyone—or else I didn't mean to say it. Because I know well that our Lord gives both types of people different kinds of fortune in this world. "He makes his sun shine on both the good and the bad, and his rain falls on both the just and the unjust." On the flip side, "he disciplines every son he accepts," but he doesn't just punish the good people he loves; "there are many punishments for sinners" too. He gives bad people good fortune in this world to try to win them over—and if they don’t respond, then their ungratefulness is even worse. And if wealth doesn’t reach them, sometimes he gives them sorrow. Some people who can't get closer to God in prosperity rush to him in times of trouble. "Their troubles multiplied," says the prophet, "and then they hurried back to him." To some good people, God sends wealth in this life; they thank him greatly for his gift, and he rewards them for their thanks too. To some good folks, he sends sorrow, and they thank him for that as well. If God were to give worldly goods only to bad people, then people would think that God wasn't in charge of them. If God handed out good things only to good people, then folks would only serve him for those reasons. Some people fall into foolishness because of wealth: "When a man is in honor, his understanding fails him; he is compared to beasts and made like them." Some people fall into sin because of suffering, and that's why the prophet says, "God will not allow the rod of the wicked to rest on the lot of the righteous, lest the righteous end up reaching for wickedness." So I don't deny that either state, wealth or suffering, can lead to virtue or vice as well.
But this is the point, lo, that standeth here in question between you and me: not whether every prosperity be a perilous token, but whether continual wealth in this world without any tribulation be a fearful sign of God's indignation. And therefore this mark that we must shoot at, set up well in our sight, we shall now aim for the shot and consider how near toward, or how far off, your arrows are from the mark.
But this is the point, look, that stands here in question between you and me: not whether every success is a dangerous sign, but whether ongoing wealth in this world without any struggle is a scary indication of God's anger. So, this goal we need to focus on, set clearly in our view, is what we will aim for now and consider how close or far your arrows are from the target.
VINCENT: Some of my bolts, uncle, will I now take up myself, and readily put them under my belt again! For some of them, I see well, are not worth the aiming. And no great marvel that I shoot wide, while I somewhat mistake the mark.
VINCENT: Some of my responsibilities, uncle, I’ll take on myself now and easily manage them again! Because I can see that some of them aren’t worth aiming for. It’s no wonder I miss the target when I’m a bit confused about what I should be aiming at.
ANTHONY: Those that make toward the mark and light far too short, when they are shot, shall I take up for you.
ANTHONY: Those who aim for the target but fall short, when they are shot, I will support you.
To prove that perpetual wealth should be no evil token, you say first that for princes and prelates, and every man for others, we pray all for perpetual prosperity, and that in the common prayers of the church, too.
To show that endless wealth shouldn't be seen as a negative sign, you first argue that for rulers, religious leaders, and everyone else, we pray for lasting success, and this is included in the common prayers of the church as well.
Then say you secondly, that if prosperity were so perilous and tribulation so profitable, every man ought to pray God to send others sorrow.
Then you also say that if success were so dangerous and struggle so beneficial, everyone should pray to God to bring sorrow upon others.
Thirdly, you furnish your objections with examples of Solomon, Job, and Abraham.
Third, you support your objections with examples of Solomon, Job, and Abraham.
And fourthly, in the end of all, you prove by experience of our own time daily before our face, that some wealthy folk are good and some needy ones very wicked. That last bolt, since I say the same myself, I think you will be content to take up, it lieth so far wide.
And finally, ultimately, you show through our own experiences every day in front of us that some rich people are good and some poor ones are very bad. Since I agree with that last point, I think you'll be okay with accepting it, as it applies so broadly.
VINCENT: That will I, with a good will, uncle.
VINCENT: Sure thing, I’ll do that willingly, uncle.
ANTHONY: Well, do so, then, cousin, and we shall aim for the rest.
ANTHONY: Alright, go ahead, cousin, and we'll focus on everything else.
First must you, cousin, be sure that you look well to the mark, and that you cannot do so unless you know what tribulation is. For since that is one of the things that we principally speak of, unless you consider well what it is, you may miss the mark again.
First, cousin, you need to make sure you pay close attention to the objective, and you can't do that unless you understand what struggle really means. Since that's one of the main topics we discuss, if you don't think carefully about it, you might miss the goal again.
I suppose now that you will agree that tribulation is every such thing as troubleth and grieveth a man either in body or mind, and is as it were the prick of a thorn, a bramble, or a briar thrust into his flesh or into his mind. And surely, cousin, the prick that very sore pricketh the mind surpasseth in pain the grief that paineth the body, almost as far as doth a thorn sticking in the heart surpass and exceed in pain the thorn that is thrust in the heel.
I assume you now agree that tribulation is anything that troubles or hurts a person, whether physically or mentally, and it's like a thorn, bramble, or briar jabbing into their flesh or mind. And truly, cousin, the sharp pain that deeply troubles the mind is much worse than the hurt that affects the body, almost as much as a thorn in the heart is more painful than a thorn in the heel.
Now cousin, if tribulation be this that I call it, then shall you soon consider this: There are more kinds of tribulation peradventure than you thought on before. And thereupon it followeth also, since every kind of tribulation is an interruption of wealth, that prosperity (which is but another name for wealth) may be discontinued by more ways than you would before have thought. Then say I thus unto you, cousin: Since tribulation is not only such pangs as pain the body, but every trouble also that grieveth the mind, many good men have many tribulations that every man marketh not, and consequently their wealth is interrupted when other men are not aware. For think you, cousin, that the temptations of the devil, the world, and the flesh, soliciting the mind of a good man unto sin, are not a great inward trouble and grief to his heart? To such wretches as care not for their conscience, but like unreasonable beasts follow their foul affections, many of these temptations are no trouble at all, but matter of their bodily pleasure. But unto him, cousin, that standeth in dread of God, the tribulation of temptation is so painful that, to be rid of it or to be sure of the victory, he would gladly give more than half his substance, be it never so great. Now if he who careth not for God think that this trouble is but a trifle, and that with such tribulation prosperity is not interrupted, let him cast in his mind if he himself come upon a fervent longing for something which he cannot get (as a good man will not), as perchance his pleasure of some certain good woman who will not be caught. And then let him tell me whether the ruffle of his desire shall not so torment his mind that all the pleasures that he can take beside shall, for lack of that one, not please him a pin! And I dare be bold to warrant him that the pain in resisting, and the great fear of falling, that many a good man hath in his temptation, is an anguish and a grief every deal as great as this.
Now, cousin, if what I call tribulation is indeed that, then you should consider this: There are more kinds of tribulation than you might have thought before. Also, since every kind of tribulation interrupts wealth, prosperity (which is just another word for wealth) can be disrupted in more ways than you would have previously imagined. So I say this to you, cousin: Since tribulation is not just pain that affects the body, but also any trouble that disturbs the mind, many good people experience many tribulations that others don’t notice, and as a result, their wealth is impacted when no one else sees it. Do you think, cousin, that the temptations from the devil, the world, and the flesh, which urge a good person to sin, aren’t a significant inward struggle and sorrow for his heart? For those who don’t care about their conscience, but like irrational animals follow their desires, many of these temptations are no trouble at all, but just a source of physical pleasure. But for him, cousin, who fears God, the suffering from temptation is so intense that he would willingly give up more than half of his possessions, no matter how vast, just to be free from it or to be assured of victory. Now, if someone who doesn’t care about God thinks this trouble is trivial and that such tribulation doesn’t interrupt prosperity, let him reflect on whether he himself experiences a strong longing for something he cannot have (as a good person wouldn’t), like the desire for a certain attractive woman who won’t be available. And then let him consider whether the turmoil of his desire won’t torment his mind so much that all the pleasures he can find elsewhere will, for the lack of that one, bring him no joy at all! And I’m bold enough to assure him that the pain of resisting and the deep fear of falling that many good people endure in their temptations is just as much anguish and grief as this.
Now I say further, cousin, that if this be true, as indeed it is, that such trouble is tribulation, and thereby consequently an interruption of prosperous wealth, no man meaneth precisely to pray for another to keep him in continual prosperity without any manner of discontinuance or change in this world. For that prayer, without other condition added or implied, would be inordinate and very childish. For it would be to pray either that they should never have temptation, or else that if they had they might follow and fulfil their affection. Who would dare, good cousin, for shame or for sin, for himself or any other man, to make this kind of prayer?
Now I say more, cousin, that if this is true, which indeed it is, that such trouble is a form of suffering and, as a result, a disruption of wealth, no one really wants to pray for someone to have continuous prosperity without any interruptions or changes in this world. Because that prayer, without any additional conditions added or implied, would be unreasonable and quite childish. It would mean praying either that they never face temptation or, if they do, that they can act on their desires. Who would dare, dear cousin, out of shame or for the sake of sin, to make such a prayer for themselves or anyone else?
Besides this, cousin, the church, you know, well adviseth every man to fast, to watch, and to pray, both for taming of his fleshly lusts and also to mourn and lament his sin before committed and to bewail his offence done against God, as they did at the city of Nineve, and as the prophet David did for his sin put affliction to his flesh. And when a man so doth, cousin, is this no tribulation to him because he doth it himself? For I know you would agree that it would be, if another man did it against his will. Then is tribulation, you know, tribulation still, though it be taken well in worth. Yea, and though it be taken with very right good will, yet is pain, you know, pain, and therefore so is it, though a man do it himself. Then, since the church adviseth every man to take tribulation for his sin, whatsoever words you find in any prayer, they never mean, do you be fast and sure, to pray God to keep every good man (nor every bad man neither) from every kind of tribulation.
Besides this, cousin, the church advises everyone to fast, watch, and pray, both to control their fleshly desires and to mourn and regret their past sins, as the people of Nineveh did and as the prophet David did when he faced his own sins by afflicting his body. And when someone does this, cousin, isn't it still a struggle for him since he chooses to? I know you'd agree it would be if someone else forced him against his will. Then, struggle is still struggle, even if it's faced with the right attitude. Yes, even if it’s approached with a good spirit, it’s still pain, and that remains true, whether the person chooses it or not. So, since the church advises everyone to accept suffering for their sins, whatever you find in any prayer doesn't mean that you should definitely pray for God to keep every good person (or every bad person) from any kind of hardship.
Now he who is not in a certain kind of tribulation, as peradventure in sickness or in loss of goods, is not yet out of tribulation. For he may have his ease of body or mind disquieted (and thereby his wealth interrupted) with another kind of tribulation, as is either temptation to a good man, or voluntary affliction, either of body by penance or of mind by contrition and heaviness for his sin and offence against God. And thus I say that for precise perpetual wealth and prosperity in this world—that is to say, for the perpetual lack of all trouble and tribulation—no wise man prayeth either for himself or for any man else. And thus I answer your first objection.
Now, anyone who isn’t experiencing a certain kind of struggle, like sickness or loss of possessions, isn’t completely free from trouble. They may still have a peaceful body or an unsettled mind (and thus their wealth affected) due to another type of struggle, such as temptation for a good person or self-imposed suffering, whether that’s physical suffering through penance or mental suffering through remorse and sorrow for their sins against God. Therefore, I assert that no wise person prays for absolute and constant wealth and prosperity in this world—that is, for an unending absence of all trouble and struggle—for themselves or anyone else. And with that, I answer your first objection.
Now before I meddle with your second, your third will I join to this. For upon this answer will the solution of your examples fittingly depend.
Now before I get into your second point, I'll add your third to this. Because this answer will appropriately determine the solution to your examples.
As for Solomon, he was, as you say, all his days a marvellous wealthy king, and much was he beloved with God, I know, in the beginning of his reign. But that the favour of God continued with him, as his prosperity did, that cannot I tell, and therefore will I not warrant it. But surely we see that his continual wealth made him fall into wanton folly, first in multiplying wives to a horrible number, contrary to the commandment of God, given in the law of Moses, and secondly in taking to wife among others some who were infidels, contrary to another commandment of God's written law. Also we see that finally, by means of his infidel wife, he fell into maintenance of idolatry himself. And of this we find no amendment or repentance, as we find of his father. And therefore, though he were buried where his father was, yet whether he went to the rest that his father did, through some secret sorrow for his sin at last—that is to say, by some kind of tribulation—I cannot tell, and am content therefore to trust well and pray God that he did so. But surely we are not so sure, and therefore the example of Solomon can very little serve you. For you might as well lay it for a proof that God favoureth idolatry as that he favoureth prosperity; for Solomon was, you know, in both.
As for Solomon, he was, as you say, a remarkably wealthy king throughout his life, and I know he was greatly loved by God at the start of his reign. However, I can't say if God's favor stayed with him along with his prosperity, so I won't guarantee that. But we definitely see that his endless wealth led him to indulge in foolishness, first by taking an outrageous number of wives against God's command given in the law of Moses, and second by marrying some who were non-believers, contradicting another commandment of God's written law. Ultimately, we see that because of his non-believing wife, he became involved in idolatry himself. And we find no evidence of repentance or change, as we do with his father. Therefore, even though he was buried where his father was, I don't know if he found the same rest his father did, possibly due to some hidden remorse for his sins—meaning through some kind of suffering. I am content to trust and pray that he did. But we cannot be certain, and that's why Solomon's example is not very useful to you. You could just as easily argue that God supports idolatry as that He supports prosperity, since Solomon experienced both.
As for Job, since our question hangeth upon prosperity that is perpetual, the wealth of Job, which was interrupted with so great adversity, can, as you yourself see, serve you for no example. And that God gave him here in this world all things double that he lost, little toucheth my matter, which denieth not prosperity to be God's gift, and given to some good men, too; namely, to such as have tribulation too.
As for Job, since our question revolves around lasting prosperity, the wealth of Job, which was disrupted by significant hardship, obviously doesn’t serve as an example for you. And the fact that God restored to him in this world everything he lost, doubled, doesn’t really relate to my point, which doesn’t deny that prosperity is a gift from God, and given to some good people as well; namely, those who also experience suffering.
But in Abraham, cousin, I suppose is all your chief hold, because you not only show riches and prosperity perpetual in him through the course of all his whole life in this world, but after his death also. Lazarus, that poor man, who lived in tribulation and died for pure hunger and thirst, had after his death his place of comfort and rest in Abraham's—that wealthy man's—bosom. But here must you consider that Abraham had not such continual prosperity but what it was discontinued with divers tribulations.
But in Abraham, cousin, I guess that's your main argument, because you not only highlight the wealth and constant success he had throughout his entire life in this world, but also after his death. Lazarus, that poor man who suffered and died from hunger and thirst, found his place of comfort and rest in Abraham's— that rich man's— embrace after he died. But you should also remember that Abraham didn't have uninterrupted prosperity; he faced various trials too.
Was it nothing to him, think you, to leave his own country, and at God's sending to go into a strange land, which God promised him and his seed forever, but in all his life he gave him never a foot? Was it no trouble, that his cousin Loth and himself were fain to part company, because their servants could not agree together? Though he recovered Loth again from the three kings, was his capture no trouble to him, think you, in the meanwhile? Was the destruction of the five cities no heaviness to his heart? Any man would think so, who readeth in the story what labour he made to save them. His heart was, I daresay, in no little sorrow, when he was fain to let Abimelech the king have his wife. Though God provided to keep her undefiled and turned all to wealth, yet it was no little woe to him in the meantime. What continual grief was it to his heart, many a long day, that he had no child begotten of his own body? He that doubteth thereof shall find in Genesis Abraham's own moan made to God. No man doubteth but Ismael was great comfort unto him at his birth; and was it no grief, then, when he must cast out the mother and the child both? As for Isaac, who was the child of the promise, although God kept his life, that was unlooked for. Yet while the loving father bound him and went about to behead him and offer him up in sacrifice, who but himself can conceive what heaviness his heart had then? I should suppose (since you speak of Lazarus) that Lazarus' own death panged him not so sore. Then, as Lazarus' pain was patiently borne, so was Abraham's taken not only patiently but—which is a thing much more meritorious—of obedience willingly. And therefore, even if Abraham had not far excelled Lazarus in merit of reward (as he did indeed) for many other things besides, and especially for that he was a special patriarch of the faith, yet would he have far surpassed him even by the merit of that tribulation well taken here for God's sake too. And so serveth for your purpose no man less than Abraham!
Was it nothing to him, do you think, to leave his own country and, at God's command, go to a foreign land that God promised him and his descendants forever, even though he never got a foot of it during his lifetime? Was it no trouble that he and his cousin Lot had to part ways because their servants couldn’t get along? Even if he rescued Lot from the three kings, was that capture no burden for him in the meantime? Was the destruction of the five cities not heavy on his heart? Anyone who reads the story would think so, considering the effort he made to save them. I would say his heart was certainly filled with sorrow when he had to let Abimelech the king take his wife. Even though God ensured she stayed pure and turned everything to prosperity, it was still a significant source of distress for him at that time. How much grief did he feel for many long days without a child of his own? Anyone who doubts this can find Abraham's own lament to God in Genesis. No one doubts that Ishmael brought him great joy upon his birth, but was it not also painful when he had to cast out both the mother and child? As for Isaac, the child of the promise, even though God spared his life unexpectedly, who but Abraham himself can fathom the heaviness in his heart when he bound him and prepared to sacrifice him? I would think that, since you mention Lazarus, Lazarus’ death did not strike him as deeply as that. Just as Lazarus bore his pain with patience, Abraham not only bore his with patience but—with even greater virtue—willingly out of obedience. Therefore, even if Abraham had not far surpassed Lazarus in the merits of reward (which he did for many reasons, particularly as a significant patriarch of the faith), he would have exceeded him merely by enduring that suffering for God’s sake. And so, for your purpose, no one is lesser than Abraham!
But now, good cousin, let us look a little longer here upon the rich Abraham and Lazarus the poor. And as we shall see Lazarus set in wealth somewhat under the rich Abraham, so shall we see another rich man lie full low beneath Lazarus, crying and calling out of his fiery couch that Lazarus might, with a drop of water falling from his finger's end, a little cool and refresh the tip of his burning tongue. Consider well now what Abraham answered to the rich wretch: "Son, remember that thou hast in thy life received wealth, and Lazarus likewise pain, but now receiveth he comfort, and thou sorrow, pain, and torment." Christ described his wealth and his prosperity: gay and soft apparel with royal delicate fare, continually day by day. "He did fare royally every day," saith our Saviour; his wealth was continual, lo, no time of tribulation between. And Abraham telleth him the same tale, that he had taken his wealth in this world, and Lazarus likewise his pain, and that they had now changed each to the clean contrary—poor Lazarus from tribulation into wealth, and the rich man from his continual prosperity into perpetual pain. Here was laid expressly to Lazarus no very great virtue by name, nor to this rich glutton no great heinous crime but the taking of his continual ease and pleasure, without any tribulation or grief, of which grew sloth and negligence to think upon the poor man's pain. For that ever he himself saw Lazarus and knew that he died for hunger at his door, that laid neither Christ nor Abraham to his charge. And therefore, cousin, this story of which, by occasion of Abraham and Lazarus, you put me in remembrance, well declareth what peril there is in continual worldly wealth; and contrariwise what comfort cometh of tribulation. And thus, as your other examples of Solomon and Job nothing for the matter further you, so your example of rich Abraham and poor Lazarus hath not a little hindered you.
But now, good cousin, let’s take a closer look at the rich Abraham and the poor Lazarus. Just as we’ll see Lazarus set in wealth beneath the rich Abraham, we’ll also see another rich man lying low beneath Lazarus, crying and calling from his fiery bed for Lazarus to just let a drop of water from his finger touch his burning tongue to cool it down. Think about what Abraham said to the rich man: “Son, remember that during your life you received wealth, and Lazarus received pain; but now he is comforted and you are in sorrow, pain, and torment.” Christ described his wealth and prosperity: fancy clothing and rich food, every single day. “He lived luxuriously every day,” said our Savior; his wealth was constant, with no time of trouble in between. And Abraham tells him the same thing—that he enjoyed his wealth in this world, while Lazarus endured suffering, and now their situations have flipped—poor Lazarus has gone from suffering to wealth, and the rich man from continual prosperity to eternal pain. There’s no mention of any great virtue for Lazarus, nor any serious crime for this rich glutton aside from enjoying his comforts and pleasures without any concern or grief, leading to neglect and laziness in considering the poor man’s suffering. The fact that he saw Lazarus and knew he was starving at his door didn’t come up with Christ or Abraham. So, cousin, this story involving Abraham and Lazarus clearly illustrates the danger of constant worldly wealth, and conversely, the comfort that comes from tribulation. Thus, just like your other examples of Solomon and Job haven't helped your case further, your example of rich Abraham and poor Lazarus has hindered you quite a bit.
XVII
VINCENT: Surely, uncle, you have shaken my examples sorely, and have in your aiming of your shot removed me these arrows, methinketh, further off from the mark than methought they stuck when I shot them! And I shall therefore now be content to take them up again.
VINCENT: Surely, uncle, you’ve really shaken my examples, and with your aim, you’ve moved these arrows of mine, I think, further away from the target than I thought they were when I shot them! So, I guess I’ll just have to pick them up again.
But meseemeth surely that my second shot may stand. For of truth, if every kind of tribulation be so profitable that it be good to have it, as you say it is, then I cannot see why any man should either wish, or pray, or do any manner of thing to have any kind of tribulation withdrawn either from himself or from any friend of his.
But it seems to me that my second attempt might be valid. Because truly, if every type of hardship is so beneficial that it's actually good to experience it, as you say it is, then I don’t understand why anyone would want to wish for, pray for, or do anything to have any kind of hardship taken away from themselves or from their friends.
ANTHONY: I think indeed tribulation so good and profitable that I might doubt, as you do, why a man might labour and pray to be delivered of it, were it not that God, who teacheth us the one, teacheth us also the other. For as he biddeth us take our pain patiently, and exhort our neighbours to do also the same, so biddeth he us also not forbear to do our best to remove the pain from us both. And then, since it is God who teacheth both, I shall not need to break my brain in devising wherefore he would bid us to do both, the one seeming opposed to the other.
ANTHONY: I actually think that struggle is really beneficial and valuable, so I might wonder, like you do, why someone would work hard and pray to be freed from it, if it weren't for the fact that God, who teaches us to endure it, also teaches us the opposite. Just as He tells us to bear our suffering patiently and encourages our neighbors to do the same, He also urges us not to hesitate in doing our best to alleviate our pain. Since it’s God who teaches us both, I don’t have to stress over why He would instruct us to do both things, even though they seem to contradict each other.
If he send the scourge of scarcity and great famine, he will that we shall bear it patiently; but yet will he that we shall eat our meat when we can get it. If he send us the plague of pestilence, he will that we shall patiently take it; but yet will he that we let blood, and lay plasters to draw it and ripen it, and lance it, and get it away. Both these points teacheth God in scripture, in more than many places. Fasting is better than eating, and hath more thanks of God, and yet will God that we shall eat. Praying is better than drinking, and much more pleasing to God, and yet will God that we shall drink. Keeping vigil is much more acceptable to God than sleeping, and yet will God that we shall sleep. God hath given us our bodies here to keep, and will that we maintain them to do him service with, till he send for us hence.
If He sends the scourge of scarcity and great famine, He wants us to endure it patiently; but He also wants us to eat our food when we can. If He sends us the plague of disease, He expects us to take it patiently; but He also wants us to let blood, apply poultices to draw it out and ripen it, and lance it to remove it. Both of these points are taught by God in scripture, in many places. Fasting is better than eating and is more appreciated by God, yet He wants us to eat. Praying is better than drinking and is much more pleasing to God, yet He wants us to drink. Keeping vigil is much more acceptable to God than sleeping, yet He wants us to sleep. God has given us our bodies to take care of, and He wants us to maintain them in His service until He calls us home.
Now we cannot tell surely how much tribulation may mar the body or peradventure hurt the soul also. Therefore the apostle, after he had commanded the Corinthians to deliver to the devil the abominable fornicator who forbore not the bed of his own father's wife, yet after he had been a while accursed and punished for his sin, the apostle commanded them charitably to receive him again and give him consolation, "that the greatness of his sorrow should not swallow him up." And therefore, when God sendeth the tempest, he will that the shipmen shall get them to their tackling and do the best they can for themselves, that the sea eat them not up. For help ourselves as well as we can, he can make his plague as sore and as long-lasting as he himself please.
Now we can’t say for sure how much trouble might damage the body or possibly hurt the soul as well. So, the apostle, after telling the Corinthians to hand over the terrible fornicator who was involved with his father's wife, later instructed them to kindly welcome him back after he had been punished for his sin, so "that the weight of his sorrow wouldn't overwhelm him." And thus, when God sends the storm, He expects the sailors to do their best to take action and care for themselves, so that the sea doesn't swallow them up. As much as we try to help ourselves, He can make His trials as painful and as long-lasting as He wishes.
And as he will that we do for ourselves, so will he that we do for our neigbour too. And he will that we shall in this world have pity on each other and not be sine affectione, for which the apostle rebuketh them that lack their tender affection here. So of charity we should be sorry too for the pain of those upon whom, for necessary cause, we ourselves be driven to put it. And whosoever saith that for pity of his neighbour's soul he will have no pity of his body, let him be sure that, as St. John saith, "He that loveth not his neighbour whom he seeth, loveth but little God, whom he seeth not," so he who hath no pity on the pain that he seeth his neighbour feel before him, pitieth little (whatsoever he say) the pain of his soul that he seeth not.
And just as He wants us to take care of ourselves, He also wants us to take care of our neighbors. He desires us to show compassion in this world and not be indifferent, which is why the apostle criticizes those who lack genuine affection here. Out of love, we should also feel sorry for those who suffer because, for necessary reasons, we end up causing them pain. And whoever claims that they will have no compassion for their neighbor's physical suffering for the sake of their soul should remember that, as St. John says, "Anyone who doesn’t love their neighbor whom they can see, can't truly love God whom they can't see." So, someone who shows no compassion for the pain they see another person enduring likely cares very little for the unseen pain of their soul, no matter what they say.
Yet God sendeth us also such tribulation sometimes because it is his pleasure to have us pray unto him for help. And therefore, the scripture telleth that, when St. Peter was in prison, the whole church without intermission prayed incessantly for him, and at their fervent prayer God by miracle delivered him. When the disciples in the tempest stood in fear of drowning, they prayed unto Christ and said, "Save us, Lord, we perish," and then at their prayer he shortly ceased the tempest. And now see we proved often that in sore weather or sickness by general processions God giveth gracious help. And many a man in his great pain and sickness, by calling upon God is marvellously made whole. This is the goodness of God who, because in wealth we remember him not, but forget to pray to him, sendeth us sorrow and sickness to force us to draw toward him, and compelleth us to call upon him and pray for release of our pain. When we learn thereby to know him and to pray to him, we take a good occasion to fall afterward into further grace.
Yet God sometimes sends us such troubles because he wants us to pray to him for help. That's why the scripture says that when St. Peter was in prison, the whole church prayed for him continuously, and through their fervent prayers, God miraculously freed him. When the disciples were terrified of drowning in the storm, they called out to Christ, saying, "Save us, Lord, we’re going to drown," and then he quickly calmed the storm. We often see that during storms or illnesses, through communal prayers, God provides gracious help. Many people have experienced remarkable healing by calling upon God in their pain and sickness. This shows the goodness of God, who, since we often forget to pray to him in good times, sends us sorrow and sickness to draw us closer to him and compel us to pray for relief from our suffering. As we learn to know him and pray to him, we create a good opportunity to receive even more grace afterward.
XVIII
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, with this good answer I am well content.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, I’m really happy with this response.
ANTHONY: Yea, cousin, but many men are there with whom God is not content! For they abuse this great high goodness of his, whom neither fair treating nor hard handling can cause to remember their maker. But in wealth they are wanton and forget God and follow their pleasure, and when God with tribulation draweth them toward him, then wax they mad and draw back as much as ever they can, and run and seek help at any other hand rather than at his. Some for comfort seek to the flesh, some to the world, and some to the devil himself.
ANTHONY: Yeah, cousin, but there are many men whom God isn’t happy with! They take advantage of His great goodness; neither kind treatment nor harsh treatment can make them remember their creator. In their wealth, they act irresponsibly and forget God, chasing after their own pleasures. And when God tries to pull them back to Him through tough times, they get angry and resist as much as they can, running to seek help anywhere but from Him. Some look for comfort in physical pleasures, some in worldly things, and some even turn to the devil himself.
Consider some man who in worldly prosperity is very dull and hath stepped deep into many a sore sin; which sins, when he did them, he counted for part of his pleasure. God, willing of his goodness to call the man to grace, casteth a remorse into his mind, after his first sleep, and maketh him lie a little while and bethink him. Then beginneth he to remember his life, and from that he falleth to think upon his death, and how he must leave all his worldly wealth within a while behind here in this world, and walk hence alone, he knows not whither. Nor knows he how soon he shall take his journey thither, nor can he tell what company he shall meet there. And then beginneth he to think that it would be good to make sure and to be merry, so that he be wise therewith, lest there happen to be indeed such black bugbears as folk call devils, whose torments he was wont to take for poet's tales. Those thoughts, if they sink deep, are a sore tribulation. And surely, if he takes hold of the grace that God therein offereth him, his tribulation is wholesome. And it shall be full comforting to remember that God by this tribulation calleth him and biddeth him come home, out of the country of sin that he was bred and brought up so long in, and come into the land of behest that floweth milk and honey. And then if he follow this calling, as many a one full well doth, joyful shall his sorrow be. And glad shall he be to change his life, to leave his wanton pleasures and do penance for his sins, bestowing his time upon some better business.
Imagine a man who, despite his worldly success, is quite dull and deeply entrenched in serious sins; sins that he viewed as part of his enjoyment at the time. Out of His goodness, God decides to call this man to grace, stirring a sense of remorse in his mind after a restless night. He lies there for a bit, reflecting on his life, and begins to think about his death, realizing he will soon have to leave all his worldly riches behind and walk away alone, not knowing where he's headed. He has no idea how soon this journey will begin or who he will meet along the way. This leads him to ponder the importance of being sure and cheerful, as long as he approaches it wisely, to avoid the frightening specters that people refer to as devils, which he had previously dismissed as mere stories. If these thoughts resonate deeply, they become a painful trial. However, if he embraces the grace that God is offering him, this trial becomes beneficial. It is comforting to remember that God, through this tribulation, is calling him to come home, away from the land of sin where he has lived for so long, and into a promised land that flows with milk and honey. If he responds to this call, as many others have successfully done, his sorrow will turn into joy. He will be happy to change his life, abandon his indulgent pleasures, and make amends for his sins, dedicating his time to more meaningful pursuits.
But some men, now, when this calling of God causeth them to be sad, they are loth to leave their sinful lusts that hang in their hearts, especially if they have any kind of living such that they must needs leave it off or fall deeper into sin, or if they have done so many great wrongs that they have many amends to make if they follow God, which must diminish much their money. Then are these folk, alas, woefully bewrapped, for God pricketh them of his great goodness still. And the grief of this great pang pincheth them at the heart, and of wickedness they wry away. And from this tribulation they turn to their flesh for help, and labour to shake off this thought. And then they mend their pillow and lay their head softer and essay to sleep. And when that will not be, then they talk a while with those who lie by them. If that cannot be either, then they lie and long for day, and get them forth about their worldly wretchedness, the matter of their prosperity, and the selfsame sinful things with which they displease God most. And at length, when they have many times behaved in this manner, God utterly casteth them off. And then they set naught by either God or devil. "When the sinner cometh even into the depth, then he contemneth," and setteth naught by anything, saving worldly fear that may befall by chance, or that needs must, he knoweth well, befall once by death.
But some guys, when they feel this calling from God that brings them sadness, are really reluctant to let go of the sinful desires in their hearts. This is especially true if they have a way of living that they would need to change significantly, or if they've done so many wrong things that if they follow God, they would have to make a lot of amends that would really cut into their income. Sadly, these people find themselves in a tough spot because God keeps pushing them with His kindness. The pain from this internal struggle hits them hard, and they turn away from their wickedness. In their turmoil, they turn to their physical needs for comfort and try to shake off these thoughts. Then they fix their pillow, lay their head down comfortably, and try to sleep. When that doesn’t work, they talk for a while with those around them. If that doesn’t help either, they just lie there waiting for morning, getting caught up in their worldly troubles, focusing on their pursuit of success and the very sins that anger God the most. Eventually, after behaving this way many times, God completely gives up on them. After that, they don't care about God or the devil. "When the sinner falls deep, they become contemptuous," caring about nothing except the worldly fears that might randomly come their way, or what they know will inevitably happen – death.
But alas, when death cometh, then cometh again his sorrow. Then will no soft bed serve, nor no company make him merry. Then must he leave his outward worship and comfort of his glory, and lie panting in his bed as it were on a pine bench. Then cometh his fear of his evil life and of his dreadful death. Then cometh his torment, his cumbered conscience and fear of his heavy judgment. Then the devil draweth him to despair with imagination of hell, and suffereth him not then to take it for a fable—and yet, if he do, then the wretch findeth it no fable. Ah, woe worth the time, that folk think not of this in time!
But unfortunately, when death arrives, so does his sorrow. No comfortable bed will help him, and no company will cheer him up. He must give up his outward worship and the comfort of his glory, lying there gasping in his bed as if it were on a hard bench. Then comes the fear of his wrongdoings and of his terrible death. Next, he faces his torment, his troubled conscience, and the dread of his harsh judgment. The devil drives him to despair with thoughts of hell, not letting him see it as just a story—and yet, if he does see it that way, the unfortunate soul discovers it’s no story at all. Oh, how sad it is that people don’t think about this in time!
God sometimes sendeth a man great trouble in his mind, and great tribulation about his worldly goods, because he would of his goodness take his delight and confidence from them. And yet the man withdraweth no part of his foolish fancies, but falleth more fervently to them than before, and setteth his whole heart, like a fool, more upon them. And then he betaketh him all to the devices of his worldly counsellors, and without any counsel of God or any trust put in him, maketh many wise ways—or so he thinks, but all turn at length to folly, and one subtle drift driveth another to naught.
God sometimes sends a person deep troubles in their mind and serious struggles with their worldly possessions because He wants to take their joy and confidence away from those things. Yet the person does not let go of their foolish thoughts; instead, they cling to them even more passionately than before, throwing their entire heart, like a fool, into them. Then they rely entirely on the advice of their worldly advisors, and without seeking any guidance from God or putting any trust in Him, they come up with many clever plans—or so they think—but in the end, they all lead to foolishness, and one clever scheme cancels out another.
Some have I see even in their last sickness, set up in their deathbed, underpropped with pillows, take their playfellows to them and comfort themselves with cards. And this, they said, did ease them well, to put fancies out of their heads. And what fancies, think you? Such as I told you right now, of their own lewd life and peril of their soul, of heaven and of hell, that irked them to think of. And therefore they cast it out with cards, playing as long as ever they might, till the pure pangs of death pulled their heart from their play, and put them in such a case that they could not reckon their game. And then their gamesters left them and slyly slunk away, and it was not long ere they galped up the ghost. And what game they came then to, that God knoweth and not I. I pray God it were good, but I fear it very sore.
Some, I see, even in their last illness, propped up in bed with pillows, bring their friends to them and find comfort in playing cards. They said it helped them forget their troubles. And what troubles, do you think? Those that I just mentioned, about their sinful lives and the danger to their souls, thoughts of heaven and hell that bothered them. So they pushed those thoughts away with cards, playing for as long as they could, until the true agony of death pulled their attention from the game and left them in a state where they couldn’t keep track of their cards. Then their gaming friends left them, sneaking away, and it wasn’t long before they breathed their last. What game they ended up in after that, only God knows, not me. I hope it was a good one, but I fear it deeply.
Some men are there also that do as did King Saul, and in their tribulation go seek unto the devil. This king had commanded all those to be destroyed who used the false abominable superstition of this ungracious witchcraft and necromancy. And yet fell he to such folly afterwards himself, that ere he went to battle he sought unto a witch and besought her to raise up a dead man to tell him how he should fare. Now God had showed him by Samuel before that he should come to naught, and he went about no amendment, but waxed worse and worse, so that God would not look to him. And when he sought by the prophet to have answer of God, there came no answer to him, which he thought strange. And because he was not heard by God at his pleasure, he made suit to the devil, desiring a woman by witchcraft to raise up the dead Samuel. But he had such success thereof as commonly they have who in their business meddle with such matters. For an evil answer had he, and an evil fortune thereafter—his army discomfited and himself slain. And as it is rehearsed in Paralipomenon, the tenth chapter of the first book, one cause of his fall was for lack of trust in God, for which he left off taking counsel of God and fell to seek counsel of the witch, against God's prohibition in the law and against his own good deed by which he punished and put out all witches so short a time before. Such fortune let them look for, who play the same part! I see many do so, who in a great loss send to seek a conjurer to get their belongings again. And marvellous things there they see, sometimes, but never great of their good. And many a silly fool is there who, when he lies sick, will meddle with no physic in no manner of wise, nor send his urine to no learned man, but will send his cap or his hose to a wisewoman, otherwise called a witch. Then sendeth she word back that she hath spied in his hose where, when he took no heed, he was taken with a spirit between two doors as he went in the twilight. But the spirit would not let him feel it for five days after, and it hath all the while festered in his body, and that is the grief that paineth him so sore. But let him go to no leechcraft nor any manner of physic—other than good meat and strong drink—for medicines would pickle him up. But he shall have five leaves of valerian that she enchanted with a charm and gathered with her left hand. Let him fasten those five leaves to his right thumb by a green thread—not bind it fast, but let it hang loose. He shall never need to change it, provided it fall not away, but let it hang till he be whole and he shall need it no more. In such wise witches, and in such mad medicines, have many fools a great deal more faith than in God.
Some men are like King Saul, turning to the devil in their times of trouble. This king had ordered the destruction of anyone practicing the false and terrible superstitions of witchcraft and necromancy. Yet later, he fell into such foolishness that before going to battle, he sought out a witch and asked her to bring back a dead man to tell him how he would fare. God had previously shown him through Samuel that he was doomed, and instead of improving his ways, he only got worse, so much so that God turned away from him. When he tried to get an answer from the prophet, he received none, which he found odd. Because he wasn’t hearing from God in his own timing, he appealed to the devil, asking a woman through witchcraft to summon the dead Samuel. But his experience turned out poorly, as it usually does for those who meddle in such matters. He received a bad answer and faced a terrible fate—his army was defeated, and he was killed. As noted in Chronicles, the reason for his downfall was his lack of trust in God, which led him to stop seeking God's counsel and instead turn to the witch, directly disobeying God's laws and going against his own earlier actions of driving out witches. Those who take the same path can expect similar consequences! I see many do this; in a time of great loss, they seek out a conjurer to retrieve their belongings. They may witness amazing things at times, but never anything truly beneficial. There are many foolish people who, when they fall ill, refuse to use any medicine or send their urine for analysis to a knowledgeable person, but choose instead to send their cap or their pants to a wise woman, also known as a witch. She then replies that she has seen in his pants that he inadvertently encountered a spirit between two doors as he was coming in at twilight. But the spirit didn’t let him notice it for five days, during which it festered in his body, causing his pain. Yet he refuses to see any doctor or use any kind of medicine—other than good food and strong drink—because he believes remedies would worsen his condition. Instead, he’ll receive five leaves of valerian that she enchanted and picked with her left hand. He should tie these five leaves to his right thumb with a green thread—not tightly, but loosely. He never has to change it, as long as it doesn’t fall off, and should let it hang there until he recovers, at which point he’ll need it no more. In this way, witches, and such foolish remedies, have many fools putting far more trust in them than in God.
And thus, cousin, as I tell you, all these folk who in their tribulation call not upon God, but seek for their ease and help elsewhere—to the flesh and the world, and to the flinging fiend—the tribulation that God's goodness sendeth them for good, they themselves by their folly turn into their harm. And those who, on the other hand, seek unto God therein, both comfort and profit they greatly take thereby.
And so, cousin, as I’m telling you, all these people who, in their struggle, don’t turn to God but look for comfort and help elsewhere—through their desires, the world, and the tempting devil—the troubles that God’s goodness sends them for their benefit, they end up turning into their own harm because of their foolishness. And those who, on the other hand, turn to God in these moments find great comfort and benefit from it.
XIX
VINCENT: I like well, good uncle, all your answers therein. But one doubt yet remaineth there in my mind, which ariseth upon this answer that you make. And when that doubt is solved, I will, mine own good uncle, encumber you no further for this time. For methinketh that I do you very much wrong to give you occasion to labour yourself so much in matter of some study, with long talking at once. I will therefore at this time move you but one thing, and seek some other time at your greater ease for the rest.
VINCENT: I appreciate all your answers, good uncle. But there's still one question on my mind that comes from your response. Once that question is resolved, I won't bother you anymore for now. I feel like I'm putting you at a disadvantage by making you work so hard on this topic with long discussions. So, for now, I’ll just ask you one thing and save the rest for another time when you have more leisure.
My doubt, good uncle, is this: I perceive well by your answers, gathered and considered together, that you will well agree that a man may both have worldly wealth and yet well go to God; and that, on the other hand, a man may be miserable and live in tribulation and yet go to the devil. And as a man may please God by patience in adversity, so may he please God by thanks given in prosperity. Now since you grant these things to be such that either of them both may be matter of virtue or else matter of sin, matter of damnation or matter of salvation, they seem neither good nor bad of their own nature, but things of themselves equal and indifferent, turning to good or to the contrary according as they be taken. And then if this be thus, I can perceive no cause why you should give the pre-eminence unto tribulation, or wherefore you should reckon more cause of comfort in it than in prosperity, but rather a great deal less—in a manner, by half.
My concern, dear uncle, is this: I understand from your responses, when considered as a whole, that you agree a person can be wealthy and still find their way to God; and conversely, a person can be struggling and suffering yet end up in a bad place. Just as someone can please God through patience during hard times, they can also please Him by giving thanks during good times. Since you acknowledge that both situations can be virtuous or sinful, leading to either damnation or salvation, they seem neither inherently good nor bad, but rather neutral, depending on how they are perceived. If that's the case, I don't see why you would favor suffering over prosperity or why you would find more comfort in it than in being prosperous, but rather, it seems like there would be much less comfort—almost by half.
For in prosperity a man is well at ease, and may also, by giving thanks to God, get good unto his soul; whereas in tribulation, though he may merit by patience (as the other, in abundance of worldly wealth, may merit by thanks), yet lacketh he much comfort that the wealthy man hath, in that he is sore grieved with heaviness and pain. Besides, a wealthy man, well at ease, may pray to God quietly and merrily with alacrity and great quietness of mind, whereas he who lieth groaning in his grief cannot endure to pray nor can he hardly think upon anything but his pain.
For when a person is thriving, they feel comfortable and can express gratitude to God, which benefits their spirit. On the other hand, during tough times, a person can still gain merit through patience, just as the wealthy person can through gratitude, but they miss out on much of the comfort that comes with wealth, as they are deeply troubled by grief and pain. Additionally, a wealthy person, feeling at ease, can pray to God happily and calmly, while someone lying in pain struggles to pray and can hardly focus on anything except their suffering.
ANTHONY: To begin, cousin, where you leave off: The prayers of him that is in wealth and him that is in woe, if the men be both wicked, are both alike. For neither hath the one desire to pray, nor the other either. And as one is hindered with his pain, so is the other with his pleasure—saving that pain stirreth a man sometimes to call upon God in his grief, though he be right bad, whereas pleasure pulleth his mind another way, though he be good enough.
ANTHONY: To start, cousin, let’s pick up where you left off: The prayers of someone who is rich and someone who is poor, if both are bad people, are basically the same. Neither of them really wants to pray. Just as one is held back by his pain, the other is distracted by his pleasure—except that pain sometimes drives a person to call on God in their sorrow, even if they’re really bad, while pleasure is likely to pull a person’s thoughts in another direction, even if they’re decent enough.
And this point I think there are few that can, if they say true, say that they find it otherwise. For in tribulation (which cometh, you know, in sundry kinds) any man that is not a dull beast or a desperate wretch calleth upon God, not hoverly but right heartily, and setteth his heart full whole upon his request, so sore he longeth for ease and help of his heaviness. But when we are wealthy and well at our ease, while our tongue pattereth upon our prayers apace—good God, how many mad ways our mind wandereth the while!
At this point, I think there are few who can honestly say they feel differently. In times of trouble (which comes in various forms), anyone who isn’t completely dull or desperately hopeless calls on God, not casually but sincerely, putting their whole heart into their plea, longing intensely for relief and help from their suffering. But when we're comfortable and at ease, while our mouths quickly recite our prayers—good Lord, how many crazy places our minds drift to in the meantime!
Yet I know well that in some tribulation there is such sore sickness or other grievous bodily pain that it would be hard for a man to say a longer prayer of matins. And yet some who lie dying say full devoutly the seven psalms and other prayers with the priest at their anointing. But those who for the grief of their pain cannot endure to do it, or who are more tender and lack that strong heart and stomach that some others have, God requireth no such long prayers of them. But the lifting up of their heart alone, without any words at all, is more acceptable to him from one in such a state, than long service so said as folk usually say it in health. The martyrs in their agony made no long prayers aloud, but one inch of such a prayer, so prayed in that pain, was worth a whole ell or more, even of their own prayers, prayed at some other time.
Yet I know that in some suffering there is such intense illness or other severe physical pain that it would be hard for someone to say a longer morning prayer. Still, some who are dying sincerely recite the seven psalms and other prayers with the priest during their anointing. But those who are unable to do so because of the intensity of their pain, or who are more fragile and lack the strong spirit and resilience that others possess, don't owe God such lengthy prayers. Simply lifting their hearts in silence, without any words, is more pleasing to Him from someone in that state than long services recited as people typically do when they are healthy. The martyrs, in their agony, didn't offer long prayers aloud, but even a brief prayer said in pain held more value than lengthy prayers they offered at other times.
Great learned men say that Christ, albeit that he was true God, and as God was in eternal equal bliss with his Father, yet as man merited not only for us but for himself too. For proof of this they lay in these words the authority of St. Paul: "Christ hath humbled himself, and became obedient unto the death, and that unto the death of the cross; for which thing God hath also exalted him and given him a name which is above all names, that in the name of Jesus every knee be bowed, both of the celestial creatures and of the terrestrial and of the infernal too, and that every tongue shall confess that our lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God his Father." Now if it be so as these great learned men say, upon such authorities of holy scripture, that our Saviour merited as man, and as man deserved reward not for us only but for himself also; then were there in his deeds, it seemeth, sundry degrees and differences of deserving. His washing of the disciples' feet was not, then, of like merit as his passion, nor his sleep of like merit as his vigil and his prayer—no, nor his prayers peradventure all of like merit, either. But though there was not, nor could be, in his most blessed person any prayer but was excellent and incomparably surpassing the prayer of any mere creature, yet his own were not all alike, but one far above another. And then if it thus be, of all his holy prayers, the chief seemeth me those that he made in his great agony and pain of his bitter passion. The first was when he thrice fell prostrate in his agony, when the heaviness of his heart with fear of death at hand, so painful and so cruel as he well beheld it, made such a fervent commotion in his blessed body that the bloody sweat of his holy flesh dropped down on the ground. The others were the painful prayers that he made upon the cross, where, for all the torment that he hanged in—of beating, nailing, and stretching out all his limbs, with the wresting of his sinews and breaking of his tender veins, and the sharp crown of thorns so pricking him into the head that his blessed blood streamed down all his face—in all these hideous pains, in all their cruel despites, yet two very devout and fervent prayers he made. One was for the pardon of those who so dispiteously put him to his pain, and the other about his own deliverance, commending his own soul to his holy Father in heaven. These prayers of his, made in his most pain, among all that ever he made, reckon I for the chief. And these prayers of our Saviour at his bitter passion, and of his holy martyrs in the fervour of their torment, shall serve us to see that there is no prayer made at pleasure so strong and effectual as that made in tribulation.
Great learned scholars say that Christ, although He was truly God and, as God, shared eternal bliss with His Father, still deserved merit not just for us but for Himself as well. To support this, they reference St. Paul's words: "Christ humbled Himself and became obedient to death, even death on a cross; therefore God exalted Him and gave Him a name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." If what these great scholars say is true, based on such holy scriptures, that our Savior merited, as a man, and deserved rewards not just for us but for Himself too, then it seems that there were different levels of merit in His actions. His washing of the disciples' feet, then, was not of equal merit to His suffering, nor was His sleep of equal merit to His vigil and prayers—nor, perhaps, were all His prayers of the same merit either. Yet, although there couldn't be any prayer in His most blessed person that wasn't excellent and far beyond the prayers of any mere creature, His prayers weren't all alike; some were far greater than others. Among all His holy prayers, the most significant seem to me to be those that He offered in His great agony and the pain of His bitter suffering. The first was when He fell prostrate three times in His agony, as the weight of His heart, filled with fear of the impending painful and cruel death that He foresaw, caused such fervent turmoil in His blessed body that the bloody sweat of His holy flesh dripped onto the ground. The others were the painful prayers He made on the cross, where, despite all the torment of being beaten, nailed, and having His limbs stretched, enduring the strain on His sinews and the breaking of His delicate veins, while the sharp crown of thorns pierced His head and made His blessed blood flow down His face—in all these horrific pains and cruelties, He made two deeply devout and fervent prayers. One was for the forgiveness of those who cruelly inflicted pain upon Him, and the other was about His own deliverance, as He commended His soul to His holy Father in heaven. I consider these prayers of His, made during His greatest suffering, to be the most significant. These prayers of our Savior during His bitter passion, along with those of His holy martyrs in the heat of their torment, show us that no prayer said out of convenience is as powerful and effective as one made in tribulation.
Now come I to the reasoning you make, when you tell me that I grant you that both in wealth and in woe a man may be wicked and offend God, in the one by impatience and in the other by fleshly lust. And on the other hand, both in tribulation and prosperity too, a man may also do very well and deserve thanks of God by thanksgiving to God for his gift of riches, worship, and wealth, as well as for his gift of need and penury, imprisonment, sickness, and pain. And therefore you cannot see why I should give any pre-eminence in comfort unto tribulation, but you would rather allow prosperity for the thing more comforting. And that not a little, but in manner by double, since therein hath the soul comfort and the body too—the soul by thanksgiving unto God for his gifts, and the body by being well at ease—whereas the person pained in tribulation taketh no comfort but in his soul alone.
Now I come to the reasoning you present when you say that I agree with you that in both wealth and hardship, a person can be wicked and offend God—through impatience in one case and through fleshly lust in the other. On the flip side, in both suffering and prosperity, a person can also do well and earn God's thanks by being grateful to God for His gifts of riches, honor, and wealth, as well as for the gifts of need, poverty, imprisonment, illness, and pain. Therefore, you don't understand why I should give any priority in comfort to suffering, while you'd prefer to see prosperity as the more comforting option. And not just a little but almost double, since prosperity brings comfort to both the soul and the body—the soul by giving thanks to God for His gifts, and the body by being at ease—while someone in suffering finds comfort only in their soul.
First, as for your double comfort, cousin, you may cut off the one! For a man in prosperity, though he be bound to thank God for his gifts, wherein he feeleth ease, and may be glad also that he giveth thanks to God; yet hath he little cause of comfort in that he taketh his ease here, unless you wish to call by the name of comfort the sensual feeling of bodily pleasure. I deny not that sometimes men so take it, when they say, "This good drink comforteth well mine heart." But comfort, cousin, is properly taken, by them that take it right, rather for the consolation of good hope that men take in their heart, of some good growing toward them, than for a present pleasure with which the body is delighted and tickled for a while.
First, regarding your double comfort, cousin, you can remove one! For a man who is doing well, even though he should be grateful to God for his gifts that bring him ease and he may feel happy to give thanks to God, he has little reason for comfort in his ease here unless you consider the physical feeling of pleasure as comfort. I don’t deny that sometimes people feel this way when they say, "This good drink really lifts my spirits." But comfort, cousin, is more accurately understood by those who see it correctly as the reassurance of good hope in their hearts, something good coming their way, rather than just a temporary pleasure that delights and stimulates the body for a bit.
Now, though a man without patience can have no reward for his pain, yet when his pain is patiently taken for God's sake and his will conformed to God's pleasure therein, God rewardeth the sufferer in proportion to his pain. And this thing appeareth by many a place in scripture, some of which I have showed you and yet shall I show you more. But never found I any place in scripture that I remember in which, though a rich man thanked God for his gifts, our Lord promised him any reward in heaven for the very reason that he took his ease and his pleasures here. And therefore, since I speak only of such comfort as is true comfort indeed, by which a man hath hope of God's favour and remission of his sins, with diminishing of his pain in purgatory or else reward in heaven; and since such comfort cometh of tribulation well taken, but not of pleasure even though it be well taken; therefore of your comfort that you double by prosperity, you may, as I told you, very well cut away the half.
Now, even though a man without patience won't earn any reward for his suffering, if he endures his pain patiently for God's sake and aligns his will with God's pleasure, God rewards him according to the extent of his suffering. This is shown in many places in Scripture, some of which I have shared with you and I will share more. However, I have never found any part of Scripture that I recall where, even if a wealthy man thanks God for his gifts, our Lord promises him any reward in heaven simply because he enjoys his comforts and pleasures here. Therefore, since I’m only discussing true comfort that gives a person hope for God's favor and forgiveness of sins, along with a reduction of their pain in purgatory or a reward in heaven; and since this kind of comfort comes from tribulation accepted well, but not from pleasure, no matter how well it's accepted; you can, as I mentioned, easily disregard half of the comfort that comes from prosperity.
Now, why I give prerogative in comfort unto tribulation far above prosperity, though a man may do well in both, of this will I show you causes two or three. First, as I before have at length showed you out of all question, continual wealth interrupted with no tribulation is a very discomfortable token of everlasting damnation. Thereupon it followeth that tribulation is one cause of comfort unto a man's heart, in that it dischargeth him of the discomfort that he might of reason take of overlong-lasting wealth. Another is, that the scripture much commendeth tribulation as occasion of more profit than wealth and prosperity, not only to those who are therein but to those who resort unto them too. And therefore saith Ecclesiastes, "Better is it to go to the house of weeping and wailing for some man's death, than to the house of a feast; for in that house of heaviness is a man put in remembrance of the end of every man, and while he liveth he thinketh what shall come after." And after yet he further saith, "The heart of wise men is where heaviness is, and the heart of fools is where there is mirth and gladness." And verily, where you shall hear worldly mirth seem to be commended in scripture, it is either commonly spoken, as in the person of some worldly-disposed people, or else understood of spiritual rejoicing, or else meant of some small moderate refreshing of the mind against a heavy and discomfortable dullness.
Now, let me explain why I believe that finding comfort in difficulties is far more valuable than enjoying constant prosperity, even though a person can thrive in both situations. Here are a couple of reasons. First, as I have explained before, continuous wealth without any challenges is a very uncomfortable sign of eternal damnation. Because of this, it follows that hardships can bring comfort to a person's heart by freeing them from the discomfort they might feel due to overly long-lasting wealth. Another reason is that the scriptures often highlight tribulation as being more beneficial than wealth and prosperity, not only for those who experience it but also for those around them. That's why Ecclesiastes says, "It is better to go to the house of mourning for someone’s death than to the house of feasting; for in the house of sorrow, a person is reminded of the end that awaits everyone, and while they live, they think about what comes next." It goes on to say, "The hearts of wise people are in places of sorrow, while the hearts of fools are in places of laughter and joy." And truly, where you see worldly joy being praised in scripture, it is either generally referenced through the words of people focused on worldly matters or understood as spiritual joy, or it refers to a small, moderate break for the mind against heavy and oppressive dullness.
Now, prosperity was promised to the children of Israel in the old law as a special gift of God, because of their imperfection at that time, to draw them to God with gay things and pleasant, as men, to make children learn, give them cake-bread and butter. For, as the scripture maketh mention, that people were much after the manner of children in lack of wit and in waywardness. And therefore was their master Moses called Pedagogus, that is, a teacher of children or (as they call such a one in the grammar schools) an "usher" or "master of the petits." For, as St. Paul saith, "the old law brought nothing unto perfection." And God also threateneth folk with tribulation in this world for sin, not because worldly tribulation is evil, but that we should well beware of the sickness of sin for fear of the thing to follow. For that thing, though it be indeed a very good wholesome thing if we take it well, is yet, because it is painful, the thing that we are loth to have. But this I say yet again and again, that the scripture undoubtedly so commandeth tribulation as far the better thing in this world toward the getting of the true good that God giveth in the world to come, that in comparison it utterly discommendeth this worldly wretched wealth and discomfortable comfort. For to what other thing tend the words of Ecclesiastes that I rehearsed to you now, that it is better to be in the house of heaviness than to be at a feast? Whereto tendeth this comparison of his, that the wise man's heart draweth thither where folk are in sadness, and the heart of a fool is where he may find mirth? Whereto tendeth this threat of the wise man, that he who delighteth in wealth shall fall into woe? "Laughter," saith he, "shall be mingled with sorrow, and the end of mirth is taken up with heaviness." And our Saviour saith himself, "Woe be to you that laugh, for you shall weep and wail." But he saith, on the other hand, "Blessed are they that weep and wail, for they shall be comforted." And he saith to his disciples, "The world shall rejoice and you shall be sorry, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy." And so it is now, as you well know, and the mirth of many who then were in joy is now turned all to sorrow. And thus you see plainly by scripture that, in matter of true comfort, tribulation is as far above prosperity as the day is about the night.
Now, prosperity was promised to the children of Israel in the old law as a special gift from God, because of their imperfections at that time, to draw them to God with joyful and pleasant things, like children learning through treats such as cake, bread, and butter. As the scripture mentions, that people acted like children, lacking wisdom and being wayward. That's why their leader Moses was called Pedagogus, meaning a teacher of children (or what they'd call a "teacher" or "master of the little ones" in grammar schools). As St. Paul says, "the old law brought nothing to perfection." And God also warns people about suffering in this world due to sin, not because worldly suffering is bad, but to make us cautious of the disease of sin out of fear of what follows. Although it’s a good and healthy thing if we accept it properly, we still dislike it because it’s painful. But I say again and again that the scripture clearly commands us that suffering is a much better thing in this world for obtaining the true goodness that God offers in the world to come, that in comparison, it utterly discourages this worldly miserable wealth and uncomfortable comfort. For what else do the words of Ecclesiastes I just quoted mean, when they say it's better to be in a house of mourning than to be at a feast? What is this comparison about, that the wise man's heart is drawn to where people are grieving, while the fool's heart is where he can find joy? What does this warning from the wise man mean, that he who delights in wealth will fall into sorrow? "Laughter," he says, "will be mixed with sadness, and the end of joy is met with heaviness." And our Savior himself says, "Woe to you who laugh, for you will weep and mourn." But he also says, "Blessed are those who weep and mourn, for they will be comforted." And he tells his disciples, "The world will rejoice and you will be sad, but your sadness will turn into joy." And so it is now, as you well know, and the joy of many who were once happy is now all turned to sorrow. And thus you can clearly see from scripture that, concerning true comfort, suffering is far above prosperity, just as day is above night.
Another pre-eminence of tribulation over wealth, in occasion of merit and reward, shall well appear upon certain considerations well marked in them both. Tribulation meriteth in patience and in the obedient conforming of the man's will unto God, and in thanks given to God for his visitation. If you reckon me now, against these, many other good deeds that a wealthy man may do—as, by riches to give alms, or by authority to labour in doing many men justice—or if you find further any other such thing; first, I say that the patient person in tribulation hath, in all these virtues of a wealthy man, an occasion of merit which the wealthy man hath not. For it is easy for the person who is in tribulation to be well willing to do the selfsame thing if he could. And then shall his good will, where the power lacketh, go very near to the merit of the deed. But the wealthy man, now, is not in a like position with regard to the will of patience and conformity and thanks given to God for tribulation. For the wealthy man is not so ready to be content to be in tribulation, which is the occasion of the sufferer's deserving, as the troubled person is to be content to be in prosperity, to do the good deeds that the wealthy man doth. Besides this, all that the wealthy man doth, though he could not do them without those things that are counted for wealth and called by that name—as, not do great alms without great riches, nor do these many men right by his labour without great authority—yet may he do these things being not in wealth indeed. As where he taketh his wealth for no wealth and his riches for no riches, and in heart setteth by neither one, but secretly liveth in a contrite heart and a penitential life, as many times did the prophet David, being a great king, so that worldly wealth was no wealth to him. And therefore worldly wealth is not of necessity the cause of these good deeds, since he may do them (and he doth them best, indeed) to whom the thing that worldly folk call wealth is yet, for his godly-set mind, withdrawn from the delight thereof, no pleasure nor wealth at all.
Another advantage of suffering over wealth, in terms of merit and reward, becomes clear when you consider certain points about both. Suffering earns merit through patience, aligning one’s will with God, and giving thanks for His presence during trials. If you compare this to the many good deeds a wealthy person can perform—such as donating money or using their influence to uphold justice—you'll see that the patient person suffering has an opportunity for merit that the wealthy individual lacks. It's easy for someone in suffering to want to do the same good things if they had the means. Their good intentions, even without the ability to act, come very close to the merit of those deeds. However, the wealthy person is not in the same position when it comes to patience, submission, and thankfulness for their own suffering. The wealthy individual is less likely to be content in hardship, which is what makes someone deserving, compared to how ready a suffering person is to be content in prosperity and do the good things that wealthy people do. Furthermore, everything the wealthy person does, even though they can’t do it without what is considered wealth—like giving large donations or doing justice for many through their authority—can still be done without actual wealth. For example, if they regard their wealth as nothing and their riches as insignificant, living instead with a humble heart and a repentant life, as King David often did, then worldly wealth means little to them. Therefore, worldly wealth isn't necessarily the source of these good deeds; rather, those who truly detach from the pleasures of what society calls wealth often end up performing those deeds best, as their focus is on their spiritual state rather than material riches.
Finally, whenever the wealthy man doth those good virtuous deeds, if we rightly consider the nature of them, we shall perceive that in the doing of them he doth ever, for the ratio and proportion of those deeds, diminish the matter of his worldly wealth. In giving great alms, he parteth with a certain amount of his worldly goods, which are in that amount the matter of his wealth. In labouring about the doing of many good deeds, his labour diminisheth his quiet and his rest, and to that extent it diminisheth his wealth, if pain and wealth be each contrary to the other, as I think you will agree that they are. Now, whosoever then will well consider the thing, he shall, I doubt not, perceive and see that in these good deeds that the wealthy man doth, though it be his wealth that maketh him able to do them, yet in so far as he doth them he departeth in that proportion from the nature of wealth toward the nature of some tribulation. And therefore even in those good deeds themselves that prosperity doth, the prerogative in goodness of tribulation above wealth doth appear.
Finally, whenever the wealthy man does good virtuous deeds, if we think carefully about their nature, we’ll see that in performing them, he always decreases his worldly wealth in proportion to those deeds. By giving large donations, he parts with a certain amount of his worldly possessions, which represent his wealth. In working to do many good deeds, his efforts reduce his peace and rest, and to that extent, they diminish his wealth, assuming that pain and wealth are opposites, which I believe you would agree they are. Now, whoever takes the time to consider this will likely realize that in these good deeds performed by the wealthy man, even though his wealth enables him to do them, as he performs these deeds, he moves away from the nature of wealth toward the nature of some suffering. Therefore, even in these good deeds done by prosperity, the superiority of tribulation in goodness over wealth becomes apparent.
Now if it happen that some man cannot perceive this point because the wealthy man, for all his alms, abideth rich still, and for all his good labour abideth still in his authority, let him consider that I speak only according to proportion. And because the proportion of all that he giveth of his goods is very little in respect of what he leaveth, therefore is the reason haply with some folk little perceived. But if it were so that he went on giving until he had given out all, and left himself nothing, then would even a blind man see it. For as he would be come from riches to poverty, so would he be willingly fallen from wealth into tribulation. And in respect of labour and rest, the same would be true. Whosoever can consider this, shall see that, in every good deed done by the wealthy man, the matter is proportionately the same.
Now, if someone can't see this point because the rich person, despite all his charity, remains wealthy and, despite all his hard work, still holds onto his power, they should remember that I'm only speaking in terms of proportion. The proportion of what he donates compared to what he keeps is very small, which is why some people may not notice it. But if he kept giving until he had nothing left for himself, even a blind person would see the difference. Just as he would go from wealth to poverty, he would willingly fall from riches into hardship. The same idea applies to work and rest. Anyone who thinks about this will understand that, in every good action taken by a wealthy person, it's all about the same proportional idea.
Then, since we have somewhat weighed the virtues of prosperity, let us consider on the other hand the afore-named things that are the matter of merit and reward in tribulation—that is, patience, conformity, and thanksgiving. Patience the wealthy man hath not, in so far as he is wealthy. For if he be pinched in any point in which he taketh patience, to that extent he suffereth some tribulation. And so not by his prosperity but by his tribulation hath he that merit. It is the same if we would say that the wealthy man hath another virtue instead of patience—that is, the keeping of himself from pride and such other sins as wealth would bring him to. For the resisting of such motions is, as I before told you, without any doubt a diminishing of fleshly wealth, and is a very true kind (and one of the most profitable kinds) of tribulation. So all that good merit groweth to the wealthy man not by his wealth but by the diminishing of his wealth with wholesome tribulation.
Then, having considered the benefits of prosperity, let's look at the previously mentioned qualities that are linked to merit and reward in times of hardship—specifically, patience, humility, and gratitude. The wealthy person typically lacks patience because, as long as they are rich, any situation that tests their patience also brings some level of hardship. Therefore, their merit comes not from their wealth but from their struggles. Similarly, we can argue that the wealthy person has a different virtue instead of patience, which is their ability to avoid pride and other sins that wealth may lead them to commit. Resisting such temptations, as I mentioned before, undoubtedly reduces material wealth and serves as a very real and beneficial form of hardship. Thus, any good qualities the wealthy person possesses come not from their riches but from the reduction of their wealth through meaningful challenges.
The most colour of comparison is in the other two; that is, in the conformity of man's will unto God, and in thanks given unto God. For as the good man, in tribulation sent him by God, conformeth his will to God's will in that behalf, and giveth God thanks for it; so doth the wealthy man, in his wealth which God giveth him, conform his will to God in that point, since he is well content to take it as his gift, and giveth God also right hearty thanks for it. And thus, as I said, in these two things can you catch the most colour to compare the wealthy man's merit with the merit of tribulation.
The most significant point of comparison lies in the other two aspects: how a person's will aligns with God and how they express gratitude to God. Just as a good person accepts the challenges sent by God and aligns their will with God’s, giving thanks for those challenges, the wealthy person does the same with their prosperity that comes from God. They willingly accept their wealth as a gift and sincerely thank God for it. Therefore, as I mentioned, these two elements provide the best grounds for comparing the merit of a wealthy person with that of someone facing hardships.
But yet that they be not matches, you may soon see by this: For no one can conform his will unto God's in tribulation and give him thanks for it, but such a man as hath in that point a very specially good disposition. But he that is truly wicked, or hath in his heart but very little good, may well be content to take wealth at God's hand, and say, "Marry, I thank you, sir, for this with all my heart, and I will not fail to love you well—while you let me fare no worse!" Confitebitur tibi, cum benefeceris ei. Now, if the wealthy man be very good, yet, in conformity of his will and thanksgiving to God for his wealth, his virtue is not like to that of him who doth the same in tribulation. For, as the philosophers said very well of old, "virtue standeth in things of hardness and difficulty." And then, as I told you, it is much less hard and less difficult, by a great deal, to be content and conform our will to God's will and to give him thanks, too, for our ease than for our pain, for our wealth and for our woe. And therefore the conforming of our will to God's and the thanks that we give him for our tribulation are more worthy of thanks in return, and merit more reward in the very fast wealth and felicity of heaven, than our conformity and our thanksgiving for our worldly wealth here.
But you can quickly tell they aren't the same: No one can align their will with God's during tough times and genuinely thank Him for it, unless they have a very special kind of disposition. A truly wicked person, or someone with little goodness in their heart, might gladly accept wealth from God, saying, "Thank you so much for this, I truly appreciate it, and I’ll be sure to love you well—as long as you don’t let things get any worse for me!" Confitebitur tibi, cum benefeceris ei. Now, if the wealthy person is genuinely good, their virtue still isn't comparable to that of someone who remains aligned with God's will and offers thanks during hardships. As the philosophers wisely noted, "virtue lies in facing challenges and difficulties." It is, as I mentioned, much easier to accept and align our will with God's when we are comfortable and to thank Him for our ease than it is amid pain, wealth, or suffering. Therefore, aligning our will with God's will and thanking Him for our tribulations is far more deserving of gratitude in return and earns greater rewards in the lasting wealth and happiness of heaven than our alignment and thanksgiving for worldly riches here.
And this thing saw the devil, when he said to our Lord of Job that it was no marvel if Job had a reverent fear unto God—God had done so much for him, and kept him in prosperity. But the devil knew well that it was a hard thing for Job to be so loving, and so to give thanks to God, in tribulation and adversity. And therefore was he glad to get leave of God to put him in tribulation, and trusted thereby to cause him to murmur and grudge against God with impatience. But the devil had there a fall in his own turn, for the patience of Job in the short time of his adversity got him much more favour and thanks of God, and more is he renowned and commended in scripture for that, than for all the goodness of his long prosperous life. Our Saviour saith himself, also, that if we say well by them or yield them thanks who do us good, we do no great thing, and therefore can we with reason look for no great thanks in return.
And this thing saw the devil when he told our Lord about Job, saying it was no surprise that Job feared God—God had done so much for him and kept him prosperous. But the devil knew it would be difficult for Job to remain loving and thankful to God during tough times and hardship. So, he was pleased to get permission from God to test Job with suffering, hoping it would make him complain and resent God out of impatience. But the devil ended up failing because Job’s patience during his brief time of hardship earned him much more favor and praise from God, and he is remembered and honored in scripture for that, more than for all the goodness of his long, prosperous life. Our Savior also said that if we speak well of those or thank those who do us good, we haven’t done anything remarkable, and so we shouldn't expect much thanks in return.
And thus have I showed you, lo, no little pre-eminence that tribulation hath in merit, and therefore no little pre-eminence of comfort in hope of heavenly reward, above the virtues (the merit and cause of good hope and comfort) that come of wealth and prosperity.
And so I've shown you, see, how significant a role suffering plays in merit, and therefore how much greater the comfort is in the hope of a heavenly reward, compared to the virtues (the merit and source of good hope and comfort) that come from wealth and prosperity.
XX
And therefore, good cousin, to finish our talking for this time, lest I should be too long a hindrance to your other business:
And so, dear cousin, to wrap up our conversation for now, so I won't hold you up for too long with your other tasks:
If we lay first, for a sure ground, a very fast faith, whereby we believe to be true all that the scripture saith (understood truly, as the old holy doctors declare it and as the spirit of God instructeth his Catholic church), then shall we consider tribulation as a gracious gift of God, a gift that he specially gave his special friends; a thing that in scripture is highly commended and praised; a thing of which the contrary, long continued, is perilous; a thing which, if God send it not, men have need to put upon themselves and seek by penance; a thing that helpeth to purge our past sins; a thing that preserveth us from sins that otherwise would come; a thing that causeth us to set less by the world; a thing that much diminisheth our pains in purgatory; a thing that much increaseth our final reward in heaven; the thing with which all his apostles followed him thither; the thing to which our Saviour exhorteth all men; the thing without which he saith we be not his disciples; the thing without which no man can get to heaven.
If we start with a strong faith as our foundation, believing everything the scripture says (understood correctly, as the ancient holy teachers explain it and as the Holy Spirit guides His Catholic Church), then we will see tribulation as a blessing from God, a gift specifically given to His special friends; something that is greatly praised in scripture; something whose opposite, when prolonged, is dangerous; something that if God does not send, people need to seek out through penance; something that helps cleanse our past sins; something that protects us from sins that might arise otherwise; something that makes us care less about the world; something that significantly reduces our suffering in purgatory; something that greatly increases our ultimate reward in heaven; the thing all His apostles followed Him into; the thing our Savior urges everyone towards; the thing without which He says we are not His disciples; the thing without which no one can reach heaven.
Whosoever thinketh on these things, and remembereth them well, shall in his tribulation neither murmur nor grudge. But first shall he by patience take his pain in worth, and then shall he grow in goodness and think himself well worthy of tribulation. And then shall he consider that God sendeth it for his welfare, and thereby shall be moved to give God thanks for it. Therewith shall his grace increase, and God shall give him such comfort by considering that God is in his trouble evermore near to him—for "God is near," saith the prophet, "to them that have their heart in trouble"—that his joy thereof shall diminish much of his pain. And he shall not seek for vain comfort elsewhere, but shall specially trust in God and seek help of him, submitting his own will wholly to God's pleasure. And he shall pray to God in his heart, and pray his friends pray for him, and especially the priests, as St. James biddeth. And he shall begin first with confession and make him clean to God and ready to depart, and be glad to go to God, putting purgatory to his pleasure. If we thus do, this dare I boldly say, we shall never live here the less by half an hour, but we shall with this comfort find our hearts lightened, and thereby the grief of our tribulation lessened, and the more likelihood to recover and to live the longer.
Whoever thinks about these things and remembers them well, will not complain or feel resentful in their suffering. First, they will accept their pain with patience, and then they will grow in goodness and see themselves as deserving of their trials. They will understand that God sends these challenges for their own good, which will inspire them to thank God for it. This will increase their grace, and God will offer them comfort by reminding them that He is always close in their trouble—“God is near,” says the prophet, “to those whose hearts are troubled”—so their joy will ease much of their pain. They will not seek empty comfort elsewhere but will trust in God and ask for His help, fully submitting their will to His wishes. They will pray to God in their hearts and ask their friends to pray for them, especially the priests, as St. James instructs. They will start with confession, making themselves clean before God, ready to depart, and they will be glad to go to Him, leaving purgatory to His decision. If we do this, I confidently say, we will not live here even a moment less; instead, we will find our hearts lightened by this comfort, reducing the pain of our trials and increasing the chances of recovery and living longer.
Now if God will that we shall go hence, then doth he much more for us. For he who taketh this way cannot go but well. For of him who is loth to leave this wretched world, mine heart is much in fear lest he did not well. Hard it is for him to be welcome who cometh against his will, who saith unto God when he cometh to fetch him, "Welcome, my Maker—spite of my teeth!" But he that so loveth him that he longeth to go to him, my heart cannot give me but he shall be welcome, albeit that he come ere he be well purged. For "Charity covereth a multitude of sins," and "He that trusteth in God cannot be confounded." And Christ saith, "He that cometh to me, I will not cast him out." And therefore let us never make our reckoning of long life. Let us keep it while we can, because God hath so commanded, but if God give the occasion that with his good will we may go, let us be glad of it and long to go to him. And then shall hope of heaven comfort our heaviness, and out of our transitory tribulation shall we go to everlasting glory—to which, good cousin, I pray God bring us both!
Now if God wants us to leave this world, then He is doing much more for us. Because the one who takes this path can only end up well. I'm really worried about those who are reluctant to leave this miserable world, fearing that they won’t fare well. It’s tough for someone to be welcomed when they arrive against their will, saying to God as He comes to take them, “Welcome, my Creator—though I don’t really want to!” But the one who loves God so much that they long to be with Him, my heart tells me they will surely be welcome, even if they arrive before they are fully cleansed. Because “Love covers a multitude of sins,” and “Whoever trusts in God will not be disappointed.” And Christ says, “Whoever comes to me, I will not cast out.” So let’s not count on living a long life. Let’s cherish it while we can, as God has commanded, but if God provides the chance for us to go willingly, let’s be happy about it and eager to go to Him. And then the hope of heaven will comfort our sorrow, and we will leave our temporary struggles behind to enter everlasting glory—to which, dear cousin, I pray God brings us both!
VINCENT: Mine own good uncle, I pray God reward you, and at this time I will no longer trouble you. I fear I have this day done you much tribulation with my importunate objections, of very little substance. And you have even showed me an example of patience, in bearing my folly so long. And yet I shall be so bold as to seek some time to talk further of the rest of this most profitable matter of tribulation, which you said you reserved to treat of last of all.
VINCENT: My good uncle, I pray God rewards you, and I won’t take up any more of your time. I’m afraid I’ve caused you a lot of trouble today with my persistent objections, which really don’t matter much. You’ve shown me remarkable patience in putting up with my foolishness for so long. Still, I’ll be bold enough to ask for some time to discuss the rest of this very valuable topic of tribulation that you mentioned you wanted to talk about last.
ANTHONY: Let that be surely very shortly, cousin, while this is fresh in mind.
ANTHONY: Let's make that happen soon, cousin, while this is still fresh in our minds.
VINCENT: I trust, good uncle, so to put this in remembrance that it shall never be forgotten with me. Our Lord send you such comfort as he knoweth to be best!
VINCENT: I hope, dear uncle, that this will serve as a reminder that I will never forget it. May our Lord send you the comfort that He knows is best!
ANTHONY: This is well said, good cousin, and I pray the same for you and for all our other friends who have need of comfort—for whom, I think, more than for yourself, you needed some counsel.
ANTHONY: This is very well said, good cousin, and I wish the same for you and for all our other friends who need comfort—for whom, I believe, more than for yourself, you needed some advice.
VINCENT: I shall, with this good counsel that I have heard from you, do them some comfort, I trust in God—to whose keeping I commit you!
VINCENT: I will, with this good advice I’ve received from you, offer them some comfort, I trust in God—to whom I entrust you!
ANTHONY: And I you, also. Farewell, mine own good cousin.
ANTHONY: And I you, too. Goodbye, my dear cousin.
______________________________
______________________________
BOOK TWO
VINCENT: It is no little comfort to me, good uncle, that as I came in here I heard from your folk that since my last being here you have had meetly good rest (God be thanked), and your stomach somewhat more come to you. For verily, albeit I had heard before that, in respect of the great pain that for a month's space had held you, you were, a little before my last coming to you, somewhat eased and relieved—for otherwise would I not for any good cause have put you to the pain of talking so much as you then did—yet after my departing from you, remembering how long we tarried together, and that we were all that while talking, and that all the labour was yours, in talking so long together without interpausing between (and that of matter studious and displeasant, all of disease and sickness and other pain and tribulation), I was in good faith very sorry and not a little wroth with myself for mine own oversight, that I had so little considered your pain. And very feared I was, till I heard otherwise, lest you should have waxed weaker and more sick thereafter. But now I thank our Lord, who hath sent the contrary. For a little casting back, in this great age of yours, would be no little danger and peril.
VINCENT: It's a great comfort to me, good uncle, that when I arrived here, I heard from your people that since my last visit, you have had some decent rest (thank God), and your appetite has improved a bit. For truly, even though I had heard earlier that due to the pain you suffered for a month, you had felt a bit better just before my last visit—otherwise, I wouldn't have put you through the effort of talking so much as you did—after I left you, I reflected on how long we had spent together, and that we were talking the whole time, with all the effort being yours, discussing such heavy and unpleasant topics of illness and other hardships. I genuinely felt bad and a bit angry with myself for not considering your discomfort more. I was very worried until I heard otherwise, fearing you might have become weaker and sicker afterward. But now I thank our Lord, who has provided the opposite outcome. A little setback at your age could be quite dangerous and risky.
ANTHONY: Nay, nay, good cousin—to talk much, unless some other pain hinder me, is to me little grief. A foolish old man is often as full of words as a woman. It is, you know, as some poets paint us, all the joy of an old fool's life to sit well and warm with a cup and a roasted crabapple, and drivel and drink and talk!
ANTHONY: No, no, good cousin—talking a lot, unless something else is bothering me, doesn’t bother me much. An old fool can be just as talkative as a woman. You know, as some poets portray us, the happiness of an old fool’s life is just sitting comfortably and warm with a drink and a roasted crabapple, babbling and sipping and chatting!
But in earnest, cousin, our talking was to me great comfort, and nothing displeasing at all. For though we commoned of sorrow and heaviness, yet the thing we chiefly thought upon was not the tribulation itself but the comfort that may grow thereon. And therefore am I now very glad that you are come to finish up the rest.
But seriously, cousin, our conversation was a great comfort to me, and it was nothing but pleasant. Even though we discussed sadness and burden, what we focused on the most was not the trouble itself but the comfort that can come from it. So, I’m really glad you’re here to wrap up the rest.
VINCENT: Of truth, my good uncle, it was comforting to me, and hath been since to some other of your friends, to whom, as my poor wit and remembrance would serve me, I did report and rehearse (and not needlessly) your most comforting counsel. And now come I for the rest, and am very joyful that I find you so well refreshed and so ready thereto. But this one thing, good uncle, I beseech you heartily. If I, for delight to hear you speak in the matter, forget myself and you both, and put you to too much pain, remember your own ease. And when you wish to leave off, command me to go my way and seek some other time.
VINCENT: Honestly, my good uncle, it has been comforting to me, and it has been for some of your other friends too, to whom I shared your really encouraging advice with all my humble understanding. Now I’m here for the rest, and I’m really glad to see you so refreshed and ready for this. But there’s one thing I sincerely ask of you: if I get so caught up in enjoying our conversation that I forget about you and myself, and it becomes too much for you, please remember to take care of yourself. Just tell me when you want to stop, and I’ll go on my way to find a better time.
ANTHONY: Forsooth, cousin, if a man were very weak, many words spoken (as you said right now) without interpausing, would peradventure at length somewhat weary him. And therefore wished I the last time, after you were gone (when I felt myself, to say the truth, even a little weary), that I had not so told you a long tale alone, but that we had more often interchanged words, and parted the talking between us, with more often interparling upon your part, in such manner as learned men use between the persons whom they devise, disputing in their feigned dialogues. But yet in that point I soon excused you and laid the lack where I found it, and that was even upon mine own neck.
ANTHONY: Truly, cousin, if someone is very weak, talking for a long time without taking a break, like you just did, might eventually tire him out. So, the last time you were here, when I honestly felt a bit exhausted, I wished I hadn’t just told you a long story by myself. I would have preferred if we had shared the conversation more, splitting the talking between us, with you contributing more often, like scholars do in their imagined dialogues. But I quickly forgave you for that and realized the fault was mine.
For I remembered that between you and me it fared as it did once between a nun and her brother. Very virtuous was this lady, and of a very virtuous place and enclosed religion. And therein had she been long, in all which time she had never seen her brother, who was likewise very virtuous too, and had been far off at a university, and had there taken the degree of Doctor of Divinity. When he was come home, he went to see his sister, as one who highly rejoiced in her virtue. So came she to the grate that they call, I believe, the locutory, and after their holy watchword spoken on both sides, after the manner used in that place, each took the other by the tip of the finger, for no hand could be shaken through the grate. And forthwith my lady began to give her brother a sermon of the wretchedness of this world, and frailty of the flesh, and the subtle sleights of the wicked fiend, and gave him surely good counsel (saving somewhat too long) how he should be well wary in his living and master well his body for the saving of his soul. And yet, ere her own tale came to an end, she began to find a little fault with him and said, "In good faith, brother, I do somewhat marvel that you, who have been at learning so long and are a doctor and so learned in the law of God, do not now at our meeting (since we meet so seldom) to me who am your sister and a simple unlearned soul, give of your charity some fruitful exhortation. For I doubt not but you can say some good thing yourself." "By my troth, good sister," quoth her brother, "I cannot, for you! For your tongue hath never ceased, but said enough for us both."
For I remembered that between you and me, it was like it once was between a nun and her brother. This lady was very virtuous and came from a place of strict and dedicated faith. She had been in that order for a long time and during all that time, she had never seen her brother, who was also very virtuous and had been studying far away at a university, where he earned his Doctor of Divinity degree. When he returned home, he went to see his sister, as someone who greatly admired her virtue. She approached the grate, known as the locutory, and after exchanging their holy greeting, as is customary there, they touched fingertips because they couldn't shake hands through the grate. Immediately, my lady started giving her brother a sermon about the misery of this world, the weaknesses of the flesh, and the sneaky tricks of the devil, offering him really good advice (though it was a bit long-winded) on how to live rightly and control his body for the sake of his soul. Yet, before she finished her own lecture, she began to criticize him a little and said, "Honestly, brother, I find it somewhat surprising that you, having studied for so long and being a doctor so knowledgeable in God’s law, don’t, now that we finally meet (since it’s so rare), offer me, your sister, who is just a simple-minded person, some meaningful advice out of your kindness. I’m sure you can share something good." "Believe me, dear sister," replied her brother, "I can't, because of you! Your tongue hasn’t stopped and has said enough for both of us."
And so, cousin, I remember that when I was once fallen in, I left you little space to say aught between. But now will I therefore take another way with you, for of our talking I shall drive you to the one half.
And so, cousin, I remember that when I was once involved, I gave you little chance to say anything in between. But now I’m going to approach you differently, because in our conversation I will lead you to one half.
VINCENT: Now, forsooth, uncle, this was a merry tale! But now, if you make me talk the one half, then shall you be contented far otherwise than was of late a kinswoman of your own—but which one I will not tell you; guess her if you can! Her husband had much pleasure in the manner and behaviour of another honest man, and kept him therefore much company, so that he was at his mealtime the more often away from home. So happed it one time that his wife and he together dined or supped with that neighbour of theirs, and then she made a merry quarrel with him for making her husband so good cheer outside that she could not keep him at home. "Forsooth, mistress," quoth he (for he was a dry merry man), "in my company no thing keepeth him but one. Serve him with the same, and he will never be away from you." "What gay thing may that be?" quoth our cousin then. "Forsooth, mistress," quoth he, "your husband loveth well to talk, and when he sitteth with me, I let him have all the words." "All the words?" quoth she, "marry, than am I content! He shall have all the words with good will, as he hath ever had. But I speak them all myself, and give them all to him, and for aught I care for them, so shall he have them all. But otherwise to say that he shall have them all, you shall keep him still rather than he get the half!"
VINCENT: Now, truly, uncle, that was a funny story! But if you make me speak half as much, you'll be far more entertained than a certain relative of yours—but I'm not telling you who; see if you can guess! Her husband really enjoyed the company of another good man and spent a lot of time with him, often leaving home during mealtime. One time, he and his wife were having dinner with that neighbor of theirs, and she playfully complained that he treated her husband so well that she couldn't keep him at home. "Well, madam," he said (since he was a witty man), "the only thing keeping him with me is one thing. Serve him that, and he won't ever leave your side." "What could that possibly be?" our cousin asked. "Well, madam," he replied, "your husband loves to talk, and when he sits with me, I let him do all the talking." "All the talking?" she said, "then I'm fine with that! He can talk as much as he likes, just like he always has. But I’ll be the one saying it all and giving it all to him, and as far as I’m concerned, he can have it all. But don’t think for a second that he’ll get all the talk from me; you’re better off keeping him around than letting him have even half of it!"
ANTHONY: Forsooth, cousin, I can soon guess which of our kin she was. I wish we had none, for all her merry words, who would let their husbands talk less!
ANTHONY: Seriously, cousin, I can easily figure out which of our relatives she is. I wish we had none, because with all her cheerful chatter, who would let their husbands talk less!
VINCENT: Forsooth, she is not so merry but what she is equally good. But where you find fault, uncle, that I speak not enough: I was in good faith ashamed that I spoke so much and moved you such questions as (I found upon your answer) might better have been spared, they were of so little worth. But now, since I see you be so well content that I shall not forbear boldly to show my folly, I will be no more so shamefast but will ask you what I like.
VINCENT: Honestly, she’s not as cheerful as she seems, but she’s just as good. But where you think I don’t talk enough, Uncle, I was genuinely embarrassed that I said so much and asked you questions that, based on your response, I should have skipped because they weren’t worth discussing. But now that I see you’re so happy with me speaking up, I won’t hold back anymore; I’ll ask you whatever I want.
I
And first, good uncle, ere we proceed further, I will be bold to move you one thing more of that which we talked of when I was here before. For when I revolved in my mind again the things that were concluded here by you, methought you would in no wise wish that in any tribulation men should seek for comfort in either worldly things or fleshly. And this opinion of yours, uncle, seemeth somewhat hard, for a merry tale with a friend refresheth a man much, and without any harm delighteth his mind and amendeth his courage and his stomach, so that it seemeth but well done to take such recreation. And Solomon saith, I believe, that men should in heaviness give the sorry man wine, to make him forget his sorrow. And St. Thomas saith that proper pleasant talking, which is called eutrapelia, is a good virtue, serving to refresh the mind and make it quick and eager to labour and study again, whereas continual fatigue would make it dull and deadly.
And first, good uncle, before we go any further, I want to boldly bring up one more thing about what we talked about when I was here before. When I thought again about the things you concluded here, I felt you wouldn’t want people to find comfort in worldly or fleshly things during hard times. This opinion of yours, uncle, seems a bit harsh because a good story with a friend really lifts a person's spirits, and it harmlessly delights their mind and boosts their courage and appetite, so it seems perfectly fine to take such a break. And Solomon says, I believe, that in tough times, people should give wine to those who are sad to help them forget their troubles. And St. Thomas says that enjoyable conversation, which is called eutrapelia, is a good virtue that refreshes the mind and makes it eager to work and study again, while constant exhaustion would just make it dull and lifeless.
ANTHONY: Cousin, I forgot not that point, but I longed not much to touch it. For neither might I well utterly forbear it, where it might befall that it should not hurt; and on the other hand, if it should so befall, methought that it should little need to give any man counsel to it—folk are prone enough to such fancies of their own mind! You may see this by ourselves who, coming now together to talk of as earnest sad matter as men can devise, were fallen yet even at the first into wanton idle tales. And of truth, cousin, as you know very well, I myself am by nature even half a gigglot and more. I wish I could as easily mend my fault as I well know it, but scant can I refrain it, as old a fool as I am. Howbeit, I will not be so partial to my fault as to praise it.
ANTHONY: Cousin, I didn’t forget that point, but I wasn’t eager to bring it up. I couldn’t completely avoid it, just in case it wouldn’t be harmful; on the other hand, if it did end up being harmful, I thought there wouldn’t be much need to advise anyone on it—people are already inclined to such thoughts on their own! You can see this in ourselves, who, while getting together to discuss serious matters, ended up right at the start in silly idle chatter. And honestly, cousin, as you know very well, I’m naturally quite the giggler and then some. I wish it were as easy to fix my flaw as I know it, but I can hardly hold it back, old fool that I am. Still, I won’t be so biased as to praise my fault.
But since you ask my mind in the matter, as to whether men in tribulation may not lawfully seek recreation and comfort themselves with some honest mirth (first agreed that our chief comfort must be in God and that with him we must begin and with him continue and with him end also), that a man should take now and then some honest worldly mirth, I dare not be so sore as utterly to forbid it. For good men and well learned have in some cases allowed it, especially for the diversity of divers men's minds. Otherwise, if we were also such as would God we were (and such as natural wisdom would that we should be, and is not clean excusable that we be not indeed), I would then put no doubt but that unto any man the most comforting talking that could be would be to hear of heaven. Whereas now, God help us, our wretchedness is such that in talking a while of it, men wax almost weary. And, as though to hear of heaven were a heavy burden, they must refresh themselves afterward with a foolish tale. Our affection toward heavenly joys waxeth wonderfully cold. If dread of hell were as far gone, very few would fear God, but that yet sticketh a little in our stomachs. Mark me, cousin, at the sermon, and commonly toward the end, somewhat the preacher speaketh of hell and heaven. Now, while he preacheth of the pains of hell, still they stay and give him the hearing. But as soon as he cometh to the joys of heaven, they are busking them backward and flockmeal fall away.
But since you’re asking my opinion on whether people in tough times can enjoy some honest laughter and comfort, let's first agree that our main comfort should come from God, and we should start, continue, and end everything with Him. I wouldn't completely forbid someone from taking a break with some honest worldly fun now and then. Good people and well-educated folks have allowed it in some cases, particularly considering the different mindsets of various individuals. Otherwise, if we were the way God wants us to be (and as natural wisdom suggests we should be, which isn’t entirely excusable that we aren’t), then I wouldn’t doubt that the most comforting topic for anyone would be talking about heaven. Unfortunately, our situation is such that discussing it often becomes tiresome. It's like hearing about heaven feels like a heavy load, and people need to lighten up afterward with silly stories. Our desire for heavenly joys has grown significantly cold. If the fear of hell were just as diminished, very few would be afraid of God, but that fear still lingers a bit. Pay attention, cousin, to the sermon, especially towards the end when the preacher usually talks about hell and heaven. While he discusses the torments of hell, people listen attentively. But as soon as he starts on the joys of heaven, they quickly start to shuffle away.
It is in the soul somewhat as it is in the body: There are some who are come, either by nature or by evil custom, to that point where a worse thing sometimes more steadeth them than a better. Some men, if they be sick, can away with no wholesome meat, nor no medicine can go down with them, unless it be tempered for their fancy with something that maketh the meat or the medicine less wholesome than it should be. And yet, while it will be no better, we must let them have it so.
It’s a bit like the body when it comes to the soul: There are people who, either by nature or by bad habits, reach a point where something worse can sometimes be more suitable for them than something better. Some people, when they're sick, can't handle any healthy food, and no medicine can work for them unless it's mixed with something that makes the food or medicine less healthy than it should be. And yet, even if it won’t improve, we have to let them have it that way.
Cassian (that very virtuous man) rehearseth in a certain conference of his that a certain holy father, in making of a sermon, spoke of heaven and heavenly things so celestially that much of his audience, with the sweet sound of it, began to forget all the world and fall asleep. When the father beheld this, he dissembled their sleeping and suddenly said to them, "I shall tell you a merry tale." At that word they lifted up their heads and hearkened unto that, and afterward (their sleep being therewith broken) heard him tell on of heaven again. In what wise that good father rebuked then their untoward minds—so dull to the thing that all our life we labour for, and so quick and eager toward other trifles—I neither bear in mind nor shall here need to rehearse. But thus much of that matter sufficeth for our purpose, that whereas you demand of me whether in tribulation men may not sometimes refresh themselves with worldly mirth and recreation, I can only say that he who cannot long endure to hold up his head and hear talking of heaven unless he be now and then between refreshed (as though heaven were heaviness!) with a merry foolish tale, there is none other remedy but you must let him have it. Better would I wish it, but I cannot help it.
Cassian (that truly virtuous man) recounts in one of his discussions that a certain holy father, while giving a sermon, spoke about heaven and heavenly things with such beauty that many in the audience became so enchanted they started to forget the world and doze off. When the father noticed this, he pretended not to see their sleeping and suddenly announced, "I’ll tell you a funny story." At that, they raised their heads and listened, and afterward (their sleep broken), they heard him talk about heaven again. I can’t recall exactly how that good father corrected their inattentiveness—so dull to what we strive for all our lives and so quick to be drawn to trivial matters—but what’s important for our discussion is that when you ask me whether, in times of trouble, people can refresh themselves with worldly fun and leisure, I can only say that if someone can’t stay attentive to discussions about heaven unless they’re occasionally lifted by a silly story (as if heaven were a burden!), then there’s no choice but to let them have it. I’d prefer otherwise, but there's nothing I can do.
Howbeit, by mine advice, let us at least make those kinds of recreation as short and as seldom as we can. Let them serve us but for sauce, and make themselves not our meat. And let us pray unto God—and all our good friends for us—that we may feel such a savour in the delight of heaven that in respect of the talking of its joys, all worldly recreation may be but a grief to think on. And be sure, cousin, that if we might once purchase the grace to come to that point, we never found of worldly recreation so much comfort in a year as we should find in the bethinking us of heaven for less than half an hour.
However, I suggest that we at least keep our leisure activities short and infrequent. They should just be a little extra pleasure, not our main focus. Let's pray to God—and ask our good friends to pray for us too—that we can experience such joy in the delights of heaven that thinking about worldly pleasures feels more like a burden. And trust me, cousin, if we could just get to that point, we would find more comfort in thinking about heaven for even half an hour than we would in a whole year of worldly recreation.
VINCENT: In faith, uncle, I can well agree to this, and I pray God bring us once to take such a savour in it. And surely, as you began the other day, by faith must we come to it, and to faith by prayer.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, I totally agree with this, and I hope God helps us to appreciate it. And truly, as you mentioned the other day, we must come to it through faith, and to faith through prayer.
But now, I pray you, good uncle, vouchsafe to proceed in our principal matter.
But now, I ask you, dear uncle, please continue with our main topic.
II
ANTHONY: Cousin, I have bethought me somewhat upon this matter since we were last together. And I find it a thing that, if we should go some way to work, would require many more days to treat of than we should haply find for it in so few as I myself believe that I have yet to live. For every time is not alike with me. Among them, there are many painful, in which I look every day to depart; my mending days come very seldom and are very shortly done.
ANTHONY: Cousin, I've been thinking about this since we last met. I realize that if we were to dig into this matter, it would take a lot more time than we might have, considering I don't think I have many days left. Not every day feels the same for me. Some days are very difficult, and I feel like I'm on the brink of leaving; my better days come very rarely and don't last long.
For surely, cousin, I cannot liken my life more fitly now than to the snuff of a candle that burneth within the candlestick's nose. For the snuff sometimes burneth down so low that whosoever looketh on it would think it were quite out, and yet suddenly lifteth up a flame half an inch above the nose and giveth a pretty short light again, and thus playeth divers times till at last, ere it be looked for, out it goeth altogether. So have I, cousin, divers such days together as every day of them I look even to die, and yet have I then after that some such few days again as you yourself see me now to have, in which a man would think that I might yet well continue. But I know my lingering not likely to last long, but out will go my snuff suddenly some day within a while. And therefore will I, with God's help, seem I never so well amended, nevertheless reckon every day for my last. For though, to the repressing of the bold courage of blind youth, there is a very true proverb that "as soon cometh a young sheep's skin to the market as an old," yet this difference there is at least between them: that as the young man may hap sometimes to die soon, so the old man can never live long.
Surely, cousin, I can't compare my life to anything better right now than the burnt end of a candle sitting in the candlestick. Sometimes the wick burns down so low that anyone looking at it would think it's completely out, and then suddenly a tiny flame flickers back to life above the wick, giving off a short burst of light again, only to play this trick multiple times until eventually—unexpectedly—it goes out for good. I've had many days like this, where I expected to die any moment, yet there are also a few days like now, where it seems I could go on. But I know this lingering can't last long; my flame will go out suddenly one day soon. So, with God's help, I will act as if I'm feeling better, but I will treat every day as though it might be my last. For although there's a true saying that "young sheep's skin goes to market as quickly as old," there's at least one difference: while a young person might die suddenly, an old person can't live for much longer.
And therefore, cousin, in our matter here, leaving out many things that I would otherwise treat of, I shall for this time speak but of very few. Howbeit, if God hereafter send me more such days, then will we, when you wish, further talk of more.
And so, cousin, in our discussion here, setting aside many things that I could talk about, I will only mention a few this time. However, if God grants me more days like this in the future, we can discuss more whenever you'd like.
III
All manner of tribulation, cousin, that any man can have, as far as for this time cometh to my mind, falleth under some one at least of these three kinds: Either it is such as he himself willingly taketh; or, secondly, such as he willingly suffereth; or, finally, such as he cannot put from him.
All kinds of troubles, cousin, that any man can experience, as far as I can remember at this moment, fall into at least one of these three categories: Either it is something he takes on willingly; or, secondly, something he suffers through willingly; or, finally, something he can't get rid of.
This third kind I purpose not to speak of now much more, for there shall suffice, for the time, those things that we treated between us the other day. What kind of tribulation this is, I am sure you yourself perceive. For sickness, imprisonment, loss of goods, loss of friends, or such bodily harm as a man hath already caught and can in no wise avoid—these things and such like are the third kind of tribulation that I speak of, which a man neither willingly taketh in the beginning, nor can (though he would) afterward put away.
This third type, I won’t go into much detail about right now, as what we discussed the other day is enough for now. You can tell what kind of suffering this is. It's illness, imprisonment, losing possessions, losing friends, or any physical harm that someone has already experienced and can't avoid. These are the third kind of suffering I’m talking about, which a person doesn’t willingly accept at first and can’t get rid of later, even if they want to.
Now think I that, just as no comfort can serve to the man who lacketh wit and faith, whatsoever counsel be given, so to those who have both I have, as for this kind, said in manner enough already. And considering that suffer it he must, since he can by no manner of means put it from him, the very necessity is half counsel enough to take it in good worth and bear it patiently, and rather of his patience to take both ease and thanks than by fretting and fuming to increase his present pain, and afterward by murmur and grudge to fall in further danger of displeasing God with his froward behaviour.
Now I think that, just as no comfort can help someone who lacks understanding and faith, no matter what advice is given, for those who have both, I have already said quite enough about this. And since he must endure it, as there’s no way to escape it, the necessity of the situation is enough advice to accept it gracefully and bear it patiently. It’s better to find relief and gratitude in his patience than to increase his current pain by sulking and complaining, which could lead to further danger of upsetting God with his negative attitude.
And yet, albeit that I think that what has been said sufficeth, yet here and there I shall in the second kind show some such comfort as shall well serve unto this last kind too.
And yet, even though I believe what has been said is enough, I will still share some comfort in the second type that will also be useful for this last type.
IV
The first kind also will I shortly pass over, too. For the tribulation that a man willingly taketh himself, which no man putteth upon him against his own will, is, you know as well as I (for it was somewhat touched the last day), such affliction of the flesh or expense of his goods as a man taketh himself or willingly bestoweth in punishment of his own sin and for devotion to God.
The first type I'll quickly go over, too. Because the hardship a person willingly takes on, which no one forces upon them, is, as you know just as well as I do (since we touched on it a bit yesterday), the suffering of the body or the expense of their possessions that someone willingly accepts or gives in punishment for their own sins and as an act of devotion to God.
Now, in this tribulation needeth he no man to comfort him. For no man troubleth him but himself, who feeleth how far forth he may conveniently bear, and of reason and good discretion shall not pass that—and if any doubt arise therein, it is counsel that he needeth and not comfort. And so the courage that kindleth his heart and enflameth it for God's sake and his soul's health shall, by the same grace that put it in his mind, give him such comfort and joy therein that the pleasure of his soul shall surpass the pain of his body.
Now, in this struggle, he doesn't need anyone to comfort him. The only one troubling him is himself, who knows how much he can reasonably handle, and with reason and good judgment, he won't go beyond that— and if any doubts come up, what he needs is advice, not comfort. So the strength that inspires his heart and ignites it for God's sake and his soul's well-being will, through the same grace that placed it in his mind, give him such comfort and joy that the happiness of his soul will outweigh the pain of his body.
Yea, and while he hath in heart also some great heaviness for his sin, yet when he considereth the joy that shall come of it, his soul shall not fail to feel then that strange state which my body felt once in a great fever.
Yeah, and even though he feels a heavy burden in his heart because of his sin, when he thinks about the joy that will come from it, his soul will certainly feel that strange condition that my body experienced once during a severe fever.
VINCENT: What strange state was that, uncle?
VINCENT: What a weird situation was that, Uncle?
ANTHONY: Forsooth, cousin, even in this same bed, it is now more than fifteen years ago, I lay in a tertian fever. And I had passed, I believe, three or four fits, when afterward there fell on me one fit out of course, so strange and so marvellous that I would in good faith have thought it impossible. For I suddenly felt myself verily both hot and cold throughout all my body; not in one part the one and in another part the other—for it would have been, you know, no very strange thing to feel the head hot while the hands were cold—but the selfsame parts, I say, so God save my soul, I sensibly felt (and right painfully, too) all in one instant both hot and cold at once.
ANTHONY: Truly, cousin, even in this very bed, more than fifteen years ago, I was suffering from a recurring fever. I had already gone through three or four episodes when something happened during one fit that was so strange and astonishing that I would honestly have thought it impossible. I suddenly felt both hot and cold all over my body at the same time; not just one part hot and another part cold—as it wouldn't be too unusual to feel a hot head with cold hands—but every single part, I swear to God, I distinctly felt (and it was quite painful, too) both hot and cold simultaneously.
VINCENT: By my faith, uncle, this was a wonderful thing, and such as I never heard happen to any other man in my days. And few men are there out of whose mouths I could have believed it.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, this was an amazing thing, and it’s something I’ve never heard happen to anyone else in my lifetime. There are very few men whose words I would have trusted about it.
ANTHONY: Courtesy, cousin, peradventure hindereth you from saying that you believe it not yet of my mouth, neither! And surely, for fear of that, you should not have heard it of me neither, had there not another thing happed me soon thereafter.
ANTHONY: Out of courtesy, cousin, maybe you're holding back from saying that you don't believe what I've told you. And honestly, because of that, you shouldn't have heard it from me at all if it weren't for something else that happened to me shortly after.
VINCENT: I pray you, what was that, good uncle?
VINCENT: Please tell me, what was that, good uncle?
ANTHONY: Forsooth, cousin, this: I asked a physician or twain, who then considered how this should be possible, and they both twain told me that it could not be so, but that I was fallen into some slumber and dreamed that I felt it so.
ANTHONY: Seriously, cousin, here’s the thing: I asked a doctor or two, and they both thought about how this could be true, but they told me that it couldn’t be, and instead, I must have fallen asleep and dreamed that I felt it.
VINCENT: This hap, hold I, little caused you to tell that tale more boldly!
VINCENT: This situation, I think, made you tell that story more confidently!
ANTHONY: No, cousin, that is true, lo. But then happed there another: A young girl here in this town, whom a kinsman of hers had begun to teach physic, told me that there was such a kind of fever indeed.
ANTHONY: No, cousin, that's true. But then something else happened: A young girl in this town, whose relative had started to teach medicine, told me that there really is such a thing as that kind of fever.
VINCENT: By our Lady, uncle, save for the credence of you, the tale would I not yet tell again upon that hap of the maid! For though I know her now for such that I durst well believe her, it might hap her very well at that time to lie, because she would that you should take her for learned.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, if it weren't for your trust, I wouldn't even tell the story of the girl again! Because even though I believe her now, she could have easily been lying at that time since she wanted you to think she was knowledgeable.
ANTHONY: Yea, but then happed there yet another hap thereon, cousin, that a work of Galen, "De differentiis febrium," is ready to be sold in the booksellers' shops, in which work she showed me then the chapter where Galen saith the same.
ANTHONY: Yeah, but then something else happened, cousin, that a work by Galen, "De differentiis febrium," is ready to be sold in the bookstores, in which work she showed me the chapter where Galen says the same thing.
VINCENT: Marry, uncle, as you say, that hap happed well. And that maid had, as hap was, in that one point more learning than had both your physicians besides—and hath, I believe, at this day in many points more.
VINCENT: Sure, uncle, as you say, that turned out well. And that girl had, as luck would have it, more knowledge in that one area than both your doctors combined—and I believe she still has more in many areas today.
ANTHONY: In faith, so believe I too. She is very wise and well learned, and very virtuous too.
ANTHONY: Honestly, I believe that as well. She is very smart, well-educated, and really virtuous too.
But see now what age is: lo, I have been so long in my tale that I have almost forgotten for what purpose I told it. Oh, now I remember me: As I say, just as I myself felt my body then both hot and cold at once, so he who is contrite and heavy for his sin shall have cause to be both glad and sad, and shall indeed be both twain at once. And he shall do as I remember holy St. Jerome biddeth—"Both be thou sorry," saith he, "and be thou also of thy sorrow joyful."
But look at what aging is: I’ve taken so long to tell my story that I’ve almost forgotten why I started it. Oh, now I remember: Just as I felt my body being both hot and cold at the same time, the person who feels regret and heaviness for their sins has reason to feel both happy and sad, and will indeed feel both at once. They should do as holy St. Jerome advises—“Be sorry,” he says, “and also find joy in your sorrow.”
And thus, as I began to say, to him that is in this tribulation—that is, in fruitful heaviness and penance for his sin—shall we need to give none other comfort than only to remember and consider well the goodness of God's excellent mercy, that infinitely surpasseth the malice of all men's sins. By that mercy he is ready to receive every man, and did spread his arms abroad upon the cross, lovingly to embrace all those who will come. And by that mercy he even there accepted the thief at his last end, who turned not to God till he might steal no longer, and yet maketh more feast in heaven for one who turneth from sin than for ninety-nine good men who sinned not at all.
And so, as I was saying, to anyone going through this tough time—that is, dealing with the deep remorse and penance for their sins—we don’t need to offer any other comfort than to remember and truly think about the incredible goodness of God's mercy, which far exceeds the evil of all human sins. Through that mercy, He is ready to welcome everyone, having stretched out His arms on the cross, ready to embrace all who wish to come to Him. And through that mercy, He even accepted the thief at the end of his life, who only turned to God when he could steal no more, and yet He celebrates more in heaven for one person who repents from sin than for ninety-nine righteous people who haven't sinned at all.
And therefore of that first kind of tribulation will I make no longer tale.
And so, I won't tell any more about that first kind of hardship.
V
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, this is very great comfort unto that kind of tribulation. And so great, also, that it may make many a man bold to abide in his sin even unto his end, trusting to be then saved as that thief was.
VINCENT: Truly, uncle, this is a great comfort during such hardship. It's so great that it might make many people feel brave enough to continue in their sins right to the end, hoping to be saved like that thief was.
ANTHONY: Very sooth you say, cousin, that some wretches are there who so abuse the great goodness of God that the better he is the worse in return are they. But, cousin, though there be more joy made of his turning who from the point of perdition cometh to salvation, for pity that God had and all his saints of the peril of perishing that the man stood in, yet is he not set in like state in heaven as he should have been if he had lived better before. Unless it so befall that he live so well afterward and do so much good that he outrun, in the shorter time, those good folk that yet did so much in much longer. This is proved in the blessed apostle St. Paul, who of a persecutor became an apostle, and last of all came in unto that office, and yet in the labour of sowing the seed of Christ's faith outran all the rest so far that he forbore not to say of himself, "I have laboured more than all the rest have."
ANTHONY: It's true what you say, cousin, that some people take advantage of God's great goodness, so the better He is, the worse they act in return. But, cousin, even though there's more joy when someone turns away from damnation to salvation, because of the compassion that God and all His saints have for the danger of falling that person faced, they're still not in the same place in heaven as they would have been if they'd lived better before. Unless they manage to live so well afterward and do so much good that they surpass those who did good for much longer. This is evident in the blessed apostle St. Paul, who went from being a persecutor to an apostle. He was the last to come to that role, yet in spreading the seeds of Christ's faith, he surpassed everyone else so much that he didn’t hesitate to say about himself, "I have labored more than all the rest."
But yet, my cousin, though I doubt not that God be so merciful unto those who, at any time of their life, turn and ask his mercy and trust in it, though it be at the last end of a man's life; and that he hireth him as well for heaven who cometh to work in his vineyard toward night at such time as workmen leave work, and goeth home, being then willing to work if time should serve, as he hireth him who cometh in the morning; yet may no man upon the trust of this parable be bold all his life to lie still in sin. For let him remember that no man goeth into God's vineyard but he who is called thither. Now he who, in hope to be called toward the night, will sleep out the morning and drink out the day, is full likely to pass at night unspoken to. And then shall he with ill rest go supperless to bed!
But still, my cousin, while I don't doubt that God is merciful to those who turn to Him for mercy and trust in it at any point in their lives, even at the end of a person's life; and that He hires the person who works in His vineyard late in the day just like He hires those who come in the morning; no one should take this parable as an excuse to spend their entire life in sin. For they should remember that no one enters God's vineyard unless they are called. Now, someone who hopes to be called late in the day but sleeps through the morning and wastes the day is very likely to go uncalled at night. And then they'll go to bed hungry and restless!
They tell of one who was wont always to say that all the while he lived he would do what he pleased, for three words when he died should make all safe enough. But then it so happed that long ere he was old his horse once stumbled upon a broken bridge. And as he laboured to recover him, when he saw that it would not be, but that down into the flood headlong he must go, in sudden dismay he cried out in the falling, "Have all to the devil!" And there was he drowned with his three words ere he died, whereon his hope hung all his wretched life.
They talk about someone who always said that as long as he was alive, he would do whatever he wanted, because three words he spoke at his death would make everything okay. But then, it so happened that long before he got old, his horse stumbled on a broken bridge. And as he struggled to regain control, realizing it was futile and they were both going to fall into the water, he suddenly shouted in panic, "To hell with it all!" And just like that, he drowned with his three words before he even died, which were the basis of his hope all his miserable life.
And therefore let no man sin in hope of grace, for grace cometh but at God's will, and that state of mind may be the hindrance that grace of fruitful repenting shall never after be offered him, but that he shall either graceless go linger on careless, or with a care that is fruitless shall fall into despair.
And so, no one should sin hoping for grace, because grace comes only at God's discretion. That mindset might prevent the grace of genuine repentance from ever being offered to him. Instead, he will either go on without grace, remaining indifferent, or fall into despair with a worry that leads to no real benefit.
VI
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, in this point methinketh you say very well. But then are there some again who say on the other hand that we shall need no heaviness for our sins at all, but need only change our intent and purpose to do better, and for all that is passed take no thought at all. And as for fasting and other affliction of the body, they say we should not do it save only to tame the flesh when we feel it wax wanton and begin to rebel. For fasting, they say, serveth to keep the body in temperance, but to fast for penance or to do any other good work, almsdeed or other, toward satisfaction for our own sins—this thing they call plain injury to the passion of Christ, by which alone our sins are forgiven freely without any recompense of our own. And they say that those who would do penance for their own sins look to be their own Christs, and pay their own ransoms, and save their souls themselves. And with these reasons in Saxony many cast fasting off, and all other bodily affliction, save only where need requireth to bring the body to temperance. For no other good, they say, can it do to ourselves, and then to our neighbour can it do none at all. And therefore they condemn it for superstitious folly. Now, heaviness of heart and weeping for our sins, this they reckon shame almost, and womanish childishness—howbeit, God be thanked, their women wax there now so mannish that they are not so childish, nor so poor of spirit, but what they can sin on as men do and be neither afraid nor ashamed nor weep for their sins at all.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, on this point, I think you make a good point. But then there are some who argue that we don't need to feel guilty about our sins at all; we just need to change our intentions and commit to doing better, and forget everything that's happened before. As for fasting and other forms of self-denial, they say we should only do it to keep our desires in check when we start to feel overwhelmed and rebellious. They believe fasting helps maintain self-control, but fasting for penance or to do good deeds to make up for our sins—this they see as a direct insult to Christ's sacrifice, which is the only thing that can truly forgive our sins without us needing to do anything in return. They claim that those who try to do penance for their own sins are trying to be their own saviors, paying their own ransom and saving their souls on their own. With these beliefs, many in Saxony have abandoned fasting and all other forms of self-denial, except when necessary to maintain self-control. They argue it does no good for us and absolutely none for our neighbors. Therefore, they consider it superstitious nonsense. Now, being upset and crying over our sins, they regard as shameful and childish—although, thank God, their women have become so bold that they are no longer so naive or weak-spirited, and they can sin like men without feeling fear, shame, or shedding a tear for their wrongdoings.
And surely, mine uncle, I have marvelled the less ever since I heard the manner of their preachers there. For, as you remember, when I was in Saxony these matters were (in a manner) but in a mammering. Luther was not then wedded yet, nor religious men out of their habits, but those that would be of the sect were suffered freely to preach what they would unto the people. And forsooth I heard a religious man there myself—one that had been reputed and taken for very good, and who, as far as the folk perceived, was of his own living somewhat austere and sharp. But his preaching was wonderful! Methinketh I hear him yet, his voice so loud and shrill, his learning less than mean. But whereas his matter was much part against fasting and all affliction for any penance, which he called men's inventions, he ever cried out upon them to keep well the laws of Christ, let go their childish penance, and purpose then to mend and seek nothing to salvation but the death of Christ. "For he is our justice, and he is our Saviour and our whole satisfaction for all our deadly sins. He did full penance for us all upon his painful cross, he washed us there all clean with the water of his sweet side, and brought us out of the devil's danger with his dear precious blood. Leave therefore, leave, I beseech you, these inventions of men, your foolish Lenten fasts and your childish penance! Diminish never Christ's thanks nor look to save yourselves! It is Christ's death, I tell you, that must save us all—Christ's death, I tell you yet again, and not our own deeds. Leave your own fasting, therefore, and lean to Christ alone, good Christian people, for Christ's dear bitter passion!" Now, so loud and shrill he cried "Christ" in their ears, and so thick he came forth with Christ's bitter passion, and that so bitterly spoken with the sweat dropping down his cheeks, that I marvelled not that I saw the poor women weep. For he made my own hair stand up upon my head.
And honestly, Uncle, I’ve been less surprised ever since I heard how those preachers are over there. You remember when I was in Saxony, those issues were kind of unclear. Luther wasn't married yet, and religious figures weren’t out of their habits, but anyone wanting to join the sect was allowed to preach whatever they wanted to the people. I actually heard one of these religious guys myself—someone who was well-regarded and seemed to live somewhat austere and strict. But his preaching was incredible! I can still hear him, his voice so loud and shrill, and his knowledge was just average. But most of what he talked about was against fasting and all the suffering people put themselves through for penance, which he called human inventions. He constantly urged them to follow Christ’s laws, abandon their childish rituals, and focus solely on salvation through Christ's death. "For He is our righteousness, our Savior, and our complete solution for all our serious sins. He did the full penance for all of us on his painful cross, washed us clean with the water from his side, and rescued us from the devil's grasp with his precious blood. So please, abandon these human inventions, your silly Lenten fasts, and your childish penance! Don’t diminish Christ’s grace or think you can save yourselves! It’s Christ's death, I tell you, that must save us all—Christ's death, I remind you again, and not our own actions. So leave off your own fasting, and trust only in Christ, dear Christian folks, for Christ’s bitter passion!" He cried "Christ" so loudly in their ears, and repeated "Christ's bitter passion" with such urgency and sweat pouring down his cheeks, that I wasn’t surprised to see the poor women crying. He made my own hair stand on end.
And with such preaching were the people so taken in that some fell to break their fast on the fasting days, not of frailty or of malice first, but almost of devotion, lest they should take from Christ the thanks of his bitter passion. But when they were awhile nursled in that point first, they could afterward abide and endure many things more, for which, if he had begun with them, they would have pulled him down.
And the people were so captivated by this preaching that some started to break their fast on fasting days, not out of weakness or wickedness, but almost out of devotion, so they wouldn’t take away from Christ the gratitude for his suffering. But once they were nurtured in that belief for a while, they could later tolerate and endure many more things, which, if he had started with them, they would have rejected.
ANTHONY: Cousin, God amend that man, whatsoever he be, and God keep all good folk from such manner of preachers! One such preacher much more abuseth the name of Christ and of his bitter passion than do five hundred gamblers who in their idle business swear and foreswear themselves by his holy bitter passion at dice. They carry the minds of the people from perceiving their craft by the continual naming of the name of Christ, and crying his passion so shrill into their ears that they forget that the Church hath ever taught them that all our penance without Christ's passion would not be worth a pea. And they make the people think that we wish to be saved by our own deeds, without Christ's death; whereas we confess that his passion alone meriteth incomparably more for us than all our own deeds do, but that it is his pleasure that we shall also take pain ourselves with him. And therefore he biddeth all who will be his disciples to take their crosses on their backs as he did, and with their crosses follow him.
ANTHONY: Cousin, may God change that man, whoever he is, and may God protect all good people from such preachers! One such preacher misuses the name of Christ and his suffering far more than five hundred gamblers who, in their free time, swear and break their oaths using his holy passion while playing dice. They distract the people from seeing their deception by constantly invoking the name of Christ and loudly proclaiming his suffering, making them forget that the Church has always taught them that without Christ's passion, all our penance wouldn't even be worth a penny. They make people believe that we seek salvation through our own actions, without Christ's death; when in fact, we acknowledge that his suffering alone is vastly more valuable for us than all our own actions combined, but it's his wish that we also share in the suffering with him. Therefore, he instructs all who want to be his followers to take up their crosses just as he did and to follow him while carrying their crosses.
And where they say that fasting serveth but for temperance to tame the flesh and keep it from wantonness, I would in good faith have thought that Moses had not been so wild that for the taming of his flesh he should have need to fast whole forty days together. No, not Hely neither. Nor yet our Saviour himself, who began the Lenten forty-days fast—and the apostles followed, and all Christendom hath kept it—that these folk call now so foolish. King Achab was not disposed to be wanton in his flesh, when he fasted and went clothed in sackcloth and all besprent with ashes. No more was the king in Nineveh and all the city, but they wailed and did painful penance for their sin to procure God to pity them and withdraw his indignation. Anna, who in her widowhood abode so many years with fasting and praying in the temple till the birth of Christ, was not, I suppose, in her old age so sore disposed to the wantonness of the flesh that she fasted for all that. Nor St. Paul, who fasted so much, fasted not all for that, neither. The scripture is full of places that prove fasting to be not the invention of man but the institution of God, and to have many more profits than one. And that the fasting of one man may do good unto another, our Saviour showeth himself where he saith that some kind of devils cannot be cast out of one man by another "without prayer and fasting." And therefore I marvel that they take this way against fasting and other bodily penance.
And where they say that fasting only serves to control the body and keep it from indulgence, I would honestly think that Moses wasn't so reckless that he needed to fast for a whole forty days to discipline his body. Neither was Elijah. And definitely not our Savior himself, who started the forty-day fast during Lent—which the apostles continued and that all of Christianity has observed, yet these people call it foolish now. King Ahab wasn’t indulging his body when he fasted and wore sackcloth covered in ashes. The same goes for the king of Nineveh and all his people, who mourned and did hard penance for their sins to get God to show them mercy and lift his wrath. Anna, who spent many years fasting and praying in the temple as a widow until the birth of Christ, I doubt was so inclined toward the pleasures of the flesh in her old age that she fasted for that reason. Nor was St. Paul, who fasted frequently, doing so just for that. The scriptures are filled with verses that show fasting is not a human invention but a divine command, and it has many benefits. Moreover, our Savior shows that the fasting of one person can benefit another when he says that some kinds of devils cannot be cast out from one person by another "without prayer and fasting." So, I find it strange that they criticize fasting and other forms of bodily penance.
And yet much more I marvel that they mislike the sorrow and heaviness and displeasure of mind that a man should take in thinking of his sin. The prophet saith, "Tear your hearts and not your clothes." And the prophet David saith, "A contrite heart and an humbled"—that is to say, a heart broken, torn, and laid low under foot with tribulation of heaviness for his sins—"shalt thou not, good Lord, despise." He saith also of his own contrition, "I have laboured in my wailing; I shall every night wash my bed with my tears, my couch will I water."
And yet, I find it even more surprising that they dislike the sorrow, heaviness, and distress that come from reflecting on their sins. The prophet says, "Tear your hearts and not your clothes." And the prophet David says, "A contrite heart and a humbled"—meaning a heart that is broken, torn, and brought low by the burdens of sorrow for his sins—"you will not, good Lord, despise." He also expresses his own remorse, saying, "I have worked hard in my weeping; I will wash my bed with my tears every night, and my couch will be soaked."
But why should I need in this matter to lay forth one place or twain? The scripture is full of those places, by which it plainly appeareth that God looketh of duty, not only that we should amend and be better in the time to come, but also that we should be sorry and weep and bewail our sins committed before. And all the old holy doctors be full and whole of that opinion, that men must have for their sins contrition and sorrow in heart.
But why should I need to point out one or two examples for this? The scripture is filled with passages that clearly show that God expects us not only to improve and be better in the future but also to feel sorry and mourn for the sins we've committed in the past. All the ancient holy doctors share that belief: that people must have contrition and sorrow in their hearts for their sins.
VII
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, this thing yet seemeth to me a somewhat sore sentence, not because I think otherwise but that there is good cause and great wherefore a man should so sorrow, but because of truth sometimes a man cannot be sorry and heavy for his sin that he hath done, though he never so fain would. But though he can be content for God's sake to forbear it thenceforth, yet not only can he not weep for every sin that is past, but some were haply so wanton that when he happeth to remember them he can scantly forbear to laugh.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, this still seems like a pretty harsh sentence to me, not because I disagree, but because there’s a good reason for a person to feel grief. However, sometimes a person can’t truly be sorry or weighed down by the sins they’ve committed, even if they really wish they could be. Even if they can choose to stop sinning for God’s sake, they can’t cry over every mistake they've made, and some were so outrageous that when they remember them, it’s hard not to laugh.
Now, if contrition and sorrow of heart be so requisite of necessity to remission, many a man should stand, it seemeth, in a very perilous state.
Now, if feeling regret and sorrow in your heart is so necessary for forgiveness, it seems that many people would be in a very dangerous position.
ANTHONY: Many so should indeed, cousin, and indeed many do so. And the old saints write very sore on this point. Howbeit, "the mercy of God is above all his works," and he standeth bound to no common rule. "And he knoweth the frailty of this earthen vessel that is of his own making, and is merciful and hath pity and compassion upon our feeble infirmities," and shall not exact of us above the thing that we can do.
ANTHONY: Many really should, cousin, and actually many do. The old saints strongly emphasize this point. However, "the mercy of God is above all his works," and He isn't bound by any common rules. "And He knows the weakness of this earthen vessel that He created, and is merciful and has pity and compassion on our frail infirmities," and will not require us to do more than we are capable of.
And yet, cousin, he who findeth himself in that state, let him give God thanks that he is no worse, in that he is minded to do well hereafter. But in that he cannot be sorry for his sin passed, let him be sorry at least that he is no better. And as St. Jerome biddeth him who sorroweth in his heart for sin to be glad and rejoice in his sorrow, so would I counsel him who cannot be sad for his sin to be sorry at least that he cannot be sorry!
And yet, cousin, if someone finds themselves in that situation, they should thank God that things aren’t worse, especially since they want to do better in the future. But since they can’t feel regret for their past sins, they should at least feel regret for not being a better person. Just as St. Jerome advises those who mourn in their hearts for their sins to be happy and rejoice in their sorrow, I would counsel anyone who can’t feel sad about their sins to at least feel sorry for not being able to feel regret!
Besides this, though I would in no wise that any man should despair, yet would I counsel such a man while that affection lasteth not to be bold of courage, but to live in double fear: First, because it is a token either of faint faith or of a dull diligence. For surely if we believe in God, and therewith deeply consider his high majesty, with the peril of our sin and the great goodness of God also, then either dread should make us tremble and break our stony heart, or love should for sorrow relent it into tears. Besides this, because, since so little misliking of our old sin is an affection not very pure and clean, and since no unclean thing shall enter into heaven, I can scantly believe but it shall be cleansed and purified before we come there. And therefore would I further give one in that state the counsel which Master Gerson giveth every man: that since the body and the soul together make the whole man, the less affliction he feeleth in his soul, the more pain in recompense let him put upon his body, and purge the spirit by the affliction of the flesh. And he who so doth, I dare lay my life, shall have his hard heart afterward relent into tears, and his soul in a wholesome heaviness and heavenly gladness too—especially if he join therewith faithful prayer, which must be joined with every good thing.
Besides this, while I definitely don’t want anyone to lose hope, I would advise someone in such a situation not to be overly confident but to live with a sense of dual fear: First, because it indicates either weak faith or lack of diligence. If we truly believe in God and seriously consider His greatness, the danger of our sins, and His immense goodness, then either our fear should make us tremble and soften our hard hearts, or our love should bring us to tears out of sorrow. Additionally, since having only a small dislike for our past sins is not a very pure feeling, and since nothing unclean can enter heaven, I can hardly believe that we won’t need to be cleansed and purified before we get there. Therefore, I would also give advice similar to what Master Gerson gives to everyone: since the body and soul together make a whole person, the less discomfort someone feels in their soul, the more pain they should inflict on their body in return, and cleanse the spirit through the suffering of the flesh. I can confidently say that anyone who does this will have their hard heart soften into tears, and their soul will find a healthy heaviness and heavenly joy too—especially if they include faithful prayer, which should accompany every good deed.
But, cousin, as I told you the other day, in these matters with these new men I will not dispute, but surely for mine own part I cannot well hold with them. For as far as mine own poor wit can perceive, the holy scripture of God is very plain against them, and the whole corps of Christendom in every Christan region. And the very places in which they dwell themselves have ever unto their own days clearly believed against them and all the old holy doctors have evermore taught against them, and all the old holy interpreters have construed against them. And therefore if these men have now perceived so late that the scripture hath been misunderstood all this while, and that of all those old holy doctors no man could understand it, then am I too old at this age to begin to study it now! And I dare not in no wise trust these men's learning, cousin, since I cannot see nor perceive any cause wherefore I should think that these men might not now in the understanding of scripture as well be deceived themselves as they would have us believe all those others have been, all this while before.
But, cousin, as I mentioned the other day, I won't argue about these matters with these new guys, but I personally can't agree with them. From what I can understand, the holy scripture of God clearly goes against them, as does the entire body of Christendom in every Christian region. The very places where they live have always believed against them, and all the old holy doctors have consistently taught against them, just as all the old holy interpreters have interpreted against them. So, if these men have only recently realized that the scripture has been misunderstood all this time, and that none of those old holy doctors could grasp it, then I'm too old to start studying it now! I really can't trust these men's knowledge, cousin, since I can't see any reason to believe they aren't just as likely to be mistaken in their understanding of scripture as they claim everyone else has been all this time.
Howbeit, cousin, if it so be that their way be not wrong, but that they have found out so easy a way to heaven as to take no thought, but make merry, nor take no penance at all, but sit them down and drink well for our Saviour's sake—set cockahoop and fill all the cups at once, and then let Christ's passion pay for all the scot—I am not he who will envy their good hap. But surely, counsel dare I give no man to adventure that way with them. But those who fear lest that way be not sure, and take upon themselves willingly tribulation of penance—what comfort they do take, and well may take therein, that have I somewhat told you already. And since these other folk sit so merry with such tribulation, we need talk to them, you know, of no such manner of comfort.
However, cousin, if their approach isn't wrong, but they've discovered such an easy way to heaven that they don't worry, just party, and don't do any penance at all—just sit back and drink heartily for our Savior's sake—raising their glasses high and filling all the cups at once, expecting Christ's suffering to cover all the costs—I'm not the one to envy their good fortune. But I definitely wouldn't advise anyone to take that path with them. However, for those who worry that this route might not be secure and willingly embrace the challenges of penance—what comfort they find, and rightly so, I've already shared a bit about that. And since these other folks are so cheerful despite their struggles, there's no reason for us to discuss any kind of comfort with them, you know.
And therefore of this kind of tribulation will I make an end.
And so I will bring this kind of trouble to a close.
VIII
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, so may you well do, for you have brought it unto a very good pass.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, you have done very well, for you have brought it to a very good point.
And now, I pray you, come to the other kind, of which you purposed always to treat last.
And now, I ask you to move on to the other type that you intended to discuss last.
ANTHONY: That shall I, cousin, very gladly do. The other kind is the one which I rehearsed second, and (sorting out the other two) have kept for the last. This second kind of tribulation is, you know, of those who willingly suffer tribulation, though of their own choice they took it not at first.
ANTHONY: I’d be happy to do that, cousin. The other type is the one I talked about second, and (sorting out the other two) I’ve saved it for last. This second type of suffering, as you know, involves those who willingly endure hardship, even though they didn’t initially choose it.
This kind, cousin, we shall divide into twain; the first we might call temptation, the second persecution. But here must you consider that I mean not every kind of persecution, but only that kind which, though the sufferer would be loth to fall in, yet will he rather abide it and suffer than, by flying from it, fall into the displeasure of God or leave God's pleasure unprocured. Howbeit, if we well consider these two things, temptation and persecution, we may find that either of them is incident into the other. For both by temptation the devil persecuteth us, and by persecution the devil also tempteth us. And as persecution is tribulation to every man, so is temptation tribulation to a good man. Now, though the devil, our spiritual enemy, fight against man in both, yet this difference hath the common temptation from the persecution: Temptation is, as it were, the fiend's snare, and persecution his plain open fight. And therefore will I now call all this kind of tribulation here by the name of temptation, and that shall I divide into two parts. The first shall I call the devil's snares, the other his open fight.
This kind, cousin, we will split into two parts; the first we might call temptation and the second persecution. But you must understand that I don’t mean every type of persecution, but only that which, although the sufferer would be reluctant to experience, they would prefer to endure rather than fall into God’s disfavor or miss out on God’s approval. Nevertheless, if we think carefully about these two things, temptation and persecution, we might see that either can lead to the other. For both through temptation does the devil persecute us, and through persecution does the devil also tempt us. Just as persecution is a trial for everyone, temptation is a trial for a good person. Now, though the devil, our spiritual enemy, fights against us in both ways, there is a distinction: Temptation is, in a sense, the devil's trap, while persecution is his direct attack. Therefore, I will now refer to all this type of suffering as temptation, and I will divide it into two parts. The first I will call the devil's traps, and the other his direct attack.
IX
To speak of every kind of temptation particularly, by itself, would be, you know, in a manner an infinite thing. For under that, as I told you, fall persecutions and all. And the devil hath a thousand subtle ways of his snares, and of his open fight as many sundry poisoned darts. He tempteth us by the world, he tempteth us by our own flesh; he tempteth us by pleasure, he tempteth us by pain; he tempteth us by our foes, he tempteth us by our own friends—and, under colour of kindred, he maketh many times our nearest friends our most foes. For, as our Saviour said, "Inimici hominis domestici eius."
To talk about every kind of temptation individually would be, in a way, endless. Because, as I mentioned, it includes persecutions and everything else. The devil has countless sneaky traps, and just as many different poisoned arrows for open attacks. He tempts us through the world, through our own desires; he tempts us with pleasure and with pain; he tempts us with our enemies and with our friends—and sometimes, under the guise of family, he turns our closest friends into our worst enemies. For, as our Savior said, "A man's enemies will be those of his own household."
But in all manner of so diverse temptations, one marvellous comfort is that, the more we be tempted, the gladder have we cause to be. For, as St. James saith, "Esteem and take it, my brethren, for a thing of all joy when you fall into diverse and sundry manner of temptations." And no marvel, for there is in this world set up (as it were) a game of wrestling, in which the people of God come in on the one side, and on the other side come mighty strong wrestlers and wily—that is, the devils, the cursed proud damned spirits. For it is not our flesh alone that we must wrestle with, but with the devil too. "Our wrestling is not here," saith St. Paul, "against flesh and blood, but against the princes and potentates of these dark regions, against the spiritual wicked ghosts of the air."
But in all kinds of different temptations, one amazing comfort is that the more we are tempted, the more reasons we have to be glad. As St. James says, "Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds." And it's no wonder, because in this world there’s like a wrestling match happening, where the people of God are on one side, and on the other side are strong and cunning wrestlers—the devils, the cursed proud damned spirits. We’re not just wrestling against our own flesh, but also against the devil. "Our struggle is not against flesh and blood," says St. Paul, "but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms."
But as God hath prepared a crown for those who on his side give his adversary the fall, so he who will not wrestle shall have none. For, as St. Paul saith, "There shall no man have the crown but he who contendeth for it according to the law of the game." And then, as holy St. Bernard saith, how couldst thou fight or wrestle for it, if there were no challenger against thee who would provoke thee thereto? And therefore may it be a great comfort, as St. James saith, to every man who feeleth himself challenged and provoked by temptation. For thereby perceiveth he that it cometh to his course to wrestle, which shall be, unless he willingly play the coward or the fool, the matter of his eternal reward.
But just as God has prepared a crown for those who stand by Him and take down His adversary, those who won’t fight won’t get one. As St. Paul says, "No one will receive the crown except those who compete for it according to the rules." And then, as holy St. Bernard states, how could you fight or struggle for it if there was no one challenging you to do so? Therefore, it can be a great comfort, as St. James says, to anyone who feels tested and provoked by temptation. Because they realize that it's time for them to engage in the struggle, which will be, unless they willingly choose to be a coward or a fool, the key to their eternal reward.
X
But now must this needs be to man an inestimable comfort in all temptation if his faith fail him not: that is, that he may be sure that God is always ready to give him strength against the devil's might and wisdom against the devil's snares.
But now this must be an invaluable comfort to man in all temptation if his faith doesn’t fail him: that is, he can be sure that God is always ready to give him strength against the devil's power and wisdom against the devil's traps.
For, as the prophet saith, "My strength and my praise is our Lord, he hath been my safeguard." And the scripture saith, "Ask wisdom of God and he shall give it thee," in order "that you may espy," as St. Paul saith, "and perceive all the crafts." A great comfort may this be in all kinds of temptation, that God hath so his hand upon him who is willing to stand and will trust in him and call upon him, that he hath made him sure by many faithful promises in holy scripture that either he shall not fall or, if he sometimes through faintness of faith stagger and hap to fall, yet if he call upon God betimes his fall shall be no sore bruising to him. But as the scripture saith, "The just man, though he fall, shall not be bruised, for our Lord holdeth under his hand."
For, as the prophet says, "The Lord is my strength and my song; he has been my protector." And the scripture says, "Ask God for wisdom, and he will give it to you," so that "you may discern," as St. Paul says, "and understand all the tricks." This can be a great comfort in any kind of temptation, knowing that God has His hand on those who are willing to stand firm and trust in Him. He has assured them through many faithful promises in holy scripture that they will not fall, or if they do stumble due to weak faith, if they call upon God in time, their fall won’t be too painful. But as the scripture says, "The righteous person may fall, but they will not be crushed, for the Lord holds them up."
The prophet expresseth a plain comfortable promise of God against all temptations where he saith, "Whoso dwelleth in the help of the highest God, he shall abide in the protection or defence of the God of heaven." Who dwelleth, now, good cousin, in the help of the high God? Surely, he who through a good faith abideth in the trust and confidence of God's help, and neither, for lack of that faith and trust in his help, falleth desperate of all help, nor departeth from the hope of his help to seek himself help (as I told you the other day) from the flesh, the world, or the devil.
The prophet delivers a clear and reassuring promise from God against all temptations when he says, "Whoever dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty." So who, dear cousin, truly dwells in the shelter of the Most High? It’s certainly the one who, through genuine faith, remains confident in God's support. Such a person doesn't fall into despair due to a lack of that faith and trust, nor do they turn away from hoping for God's help to seek assistance from the flesh, the world, or the devil, as I mentioned the other day.
Now he then who by fast faith and sure hope dwelleth in God's help, and hangeth always upon that hope, never falling from it, he shall, saith the prophet, ever dwell and abide in God's defence and protection. That is to say, while he faileth not to believe well and hope well, God will never fail in all temptation to defend him. For unto such a faithful well-hoping man the prophet in the same psalm saith further, "With his shoulders shall he shadow thee, and under his feathers shalt thou trust." Lo, here hath every faithful man a sure promise that in the fervent heat of temptation or tribulation—for, as I have said divers times before, each is in such wise incident to the other that the devil useth every tribulation for temptation to bring us to impatience, and thereby to murmur and grudge and blasphemy; and every kind of temptation, to a good man who fighteth against it and will not follow it, is a very painful tribulation. In the fervent heat, I say therefore, of every temptation, God giveth the faithful man who hopeth in him the shadow of his holy shoulders. His shoulders are broad and large enough to cool and refresh the man in that heat, and in every tribulation he putteth them for a defence between. And then what weapon of the devil may give us any deadly wound, while that impenetrable shield of the shoulder of God standeth always between?
Now, the one who has strong faith and confident hope in God's help, and always relies on that hope without faltering, will, as the prophet says, always find safety and protection in God. In other words, as long as he maintains good belief and good hope, God will never fail to defend him in times of temptation. For to such a faithful and hopeful person, the prophet in the same psalm further states, "He will cover you with his wings, and you can find refuge under his feathers." Here, every faithful person has a solid promise that in the intense heat of temptation or tribulation—because, as I've mentioned before, each is closely linked, and the devil uses every tribulation as a temptation to lead us toward impatience, murmuring, and blasphemy; and any form of temptation, for a good person fighting against it and refusing to give in, is a painful trial. In that intense heat of every temptation, God gives the faithful person who hopes in him the shelter of his holy presence. His presence is broad and expansive enough to cool and comfort someone in that heat, and he provides protection in every trial. So, what weapon of the devil could inflict a fatal wound when that impenetrable shield of God’s protection always stands between us?
Then goeth the verse further, and saith unto such a faithful man, "Thine hope shall be under his feathers." That is, for the good hope thou hast in his help, he will take thee so near him into his protection that, as the hen, to keep her young chickens from the kite, nestled them together under her wings, so from the devil's claws—the ravenous kite of this dark air—will the God of heaven gather the faithful trusting folk near unto his own sides, and set them in surety, very well and warm, under the covering of his heavenly wings. And of this defence and protection, our Saviour spoke himself unto the Jews, as mention is made in the twenty-third chapter of St. Matthew, to whom he said in this wise: "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, that killest the prophets and stonest unto death them that are sent to thee, how often would I have gathered thee together, as the hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and thou wouldst not."
Then the verse continues, saying to a faithful person, "Your hope will be like a shelter under his feathers." This means that because of the good hope you have in his help, he will draw you close into his protection. Just like a hen keeps her chicks safe from a hawk by tucking them under her wings, the God of heaven will gather those who faithfully trust him close to his side, ensuring they are safe and warm under the cover of his heavenly wings. Our Savior himself spoke about this protection to the Jews, as mentioned in the twenty-third chapter of St. Matthew, saying, "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing."
Here are, cousin Vincent, words of no little comfort unto every Christian man. For by them we may see with what tender affection God of his great goodness longeth to gather us under the protection of his wings, and how often like a loving hen he clucketh home unto him even those chickens of his that wilfully walk abroad into the kite's danger and will not come at his clucking, but ever, the more he clucketh for them, the farther they go from him. And therefore can we not doubt that, if we will follow him and with faithful hope come running to him, he shall in all matter of temptation take us near unto him and set us even under his wing. And then are we safe, if we will tarry there, for against our will no power can pull us thence, nor hurt our souls there. "Set me near unto thee," saith the prophet, "and fight against me whose hand that will." And to show the great safeguard and surety that we shall have while we sit under his heavenly feathers, the prophet saith yet a great deal further, "In velamento alarum tuarum exaltabo." That is, that we shall not only sit in safeguard when we sit by his sweet side under his holy wing, but we shall also under the covering of his heavenly wings with great exultation rejoice.
Here are, cousin Vincent, words of great comfort for every Christian. They show us how deeply God, in His goodness, longs to gather us under His protection, just like a loving hen who calls her chicks home, even those who intentionally wander into danger and ignore her calls. The more He calls, the further they stray from Him. So, we can be sure that if we choose to follow Him and run to Him with faith, He will always draw us close in times of temptation and shelter us under His wing. We are safe there, as no force can drag us away against our will, nor harm our souls. "Draw me near to You," says the prophet, "and let anyone fight against me as they wish." To emphasize the great safety and security we have while resting under His heavenly care, the prophet also says, "In velamento alarum tuarum exaltabo." This means that not only will we find protection when we sit beside Him under His holy wing, but we will also rejoice with great joy under the cover of His heavenly wings.
XI
Now, in the two next verses following, the prophet briefly comprehendeth four kinds of temptations, and therein all the tribulation that we shall now speak of, and also some part of that which we have spoken of before. And therefore I shall peradventure (unless any further thing fall in our way) with treating of those two verses, finish and end all our matter.
Now, in the next two verses, the prophet briefly outlines four types of temptations, including all the suffering we will discuss now, as well as some of what we talked about earlier. So, I might just wrap everything up by discussing those two verses, unless something else comes up.
The prophet saith in the ninetieth psalm, "Scuto circumdabit te veritas eius; non timebis a timore nocturno, a sagitta volante in die, a negotio perambulante in tenebris, ab incurso et demonio meridiano. The truth of God shall compass thee about with a shield, you shall not be afraid of the night's fear, nor of the arrow flying in the day, nor of business walking about in the darknesses, nor of the incursion or invasion of the devil in the midday."
The prophet says in the ninetieth psalm, "His truth will be your shield; you won’t be afraid of the fear at night, nor of the arrow that flies during the day, nor of the troubles that roam in the darkness, nor of the attacks or evil that come at noon."
First, cousin, in these words "the truth of God shall compass thee about with a shield," the prophet for the comfort of every good man in all temptation and in all tribulation, besides those other things that he said before—that the shoulders of God should shadow them and that also they should sit under his wing—here saith he further that the truth of God shall compass thee with a shield. That is, as God hath faithfully promised to protect and defend those that faithfully will dwell in the trust of his help, so will he truly perform it. And thou who art such a one, the truth of his promise will defend thee not with a little round buckler that scantly can cover the head, but with a long large shield that covereth all along the body. This shield is made (as holy St. Bernard saith) broad above with the Godhead and narrow beneath with the Manhood, so that it is our Saviour Christ himself. And yet is this shield not like other shields of the world, which are so made that while they defend one part the man may be wounded upon another. But this shield is such that, as the prophet saith, it shall round about enclose and compass thee, so that thine enemy shall hurt thy soul on no side. For "with a shield," saith he, "shall his truth environ and compass thee round about."
First, cousin, in these words "the truth of God will surround you with a shield," the prophet offers comfort to every good person facing temptation and tribulation. Along with what he previously stated—that God's presence will provide protection and that you will find shelter under His wing—he further asserts that the truth of God will surround you with a shield. This means that just as God has promised to protect and defend those who trust in Him, He will fulfill that promise. And you, who are one of those people, will be safeguarded not by a small, weak shield that barely covers your head, but by a large shield that protects your entire body. This shield is, as holy St. Bernard says, broad at the top with divine power and narrow at the bottom with humanity, representing our Savior Christ Himself. Moreover, this shield is unlike worldly shields, which may protect one area but leave another vulnerable. This shield, as the prophet claims, will completely surround and protect you, ensuring that your enemy cannot harm your soul from any angle. For "with a shield," he says, "His truth will encompass and surround you."
And then incontinently following, to the intent that we should see that it is not without necessity that the shield of God should compass us about upon every side, he showeth in what wise we are environed by the devil upon every side with snares and assaults, by four kinds of temptations and tribulations. Against all this compass of temptations and tribulations that round-compassing shield of God's truth shall so defend us and keep us safe that we shall need to dread none of them at all.
And then immediately after, to show us that it’s essential for God’s shield to surround us on all sides, He reveals how we are surrounded by the devil with traps and attacks in four different kinds of temptations and challenges. Against this complete range of temptations and hardships, God’s truth will protect us so well that we won’t need to fear any of them at all.
XII
First, he saith, "thou shalt not be afraid of the fear of the night." By the night is there in scripture sometimes understood tribulation, as appeareth in the thirty-fourth chapter of Job: "God hath known the works of them, and therefore shall he bring night upon them," that is, tribulation for their wickedness. And well you know that the night is of its own nature discomfortable and full of fear. And therefore by the night's fear here I understand the tribulation by which the devil, through the sufference of God, either by himself or by others who are his instruments, tempteth good folk to impatience as he did Job. But he who, as the prophet saith, dwelleth and continueth faithfully in the hope of God's help, shall so be clipped in on every side with the shield of God that he shall have no need to be afraid of such tribulation as is here called the night's fear. And it may be also fittingly called the night's fear for two causes: One, because many times, unto him who suffereth, the cause of his tribulation is dark and unknown. And therein it varieth and differeth from that tribulation by which the devil tempteth a man with open fight and assault for a known good thing from which he would withdraw him, or for some known evil thing into which he would drive him by force of such persecution. Another cause for which it is called the night's fear may be because the night is so far out of courage, and naturally so casteth folk into fear, that their fancy doubleth their fear of everything of which they perceive any manner of dread, and maketh them often think that it were much worse than indeed it is.
First, he says, "you shall not be afraid of the fear of the night." In scripture, "night" can sometimes refer to tribulation, as seen in the thirty-fourth chapter of Job: "God has seen what they do, and therefore will bring night upon them," meaning tribulation for their wrongdoing. And you know that night is inherently uncomfortable and full of fear. So, by the "fear of the night," I mean the tribulation through which the devil, with God's allowance, either directly or through his agents, tempts good people to lose patience, just as he did with Job. But he who truly remains steadfast in faith and hope for God's help will be surrounded by God's protection, so he won’t need to fear the tribulation referred to as the "fear of the night." It can also be rightly called the "fear of the night" for two reasons: first, because often for those suffering, the reason for their tribulation is dark and unknown. This differs from the tribulation where the devil openly attacks someone to pull them away from a recognized good or push them into a known evil through direct persecution. The second reason it’s called the "fear of the night" is that the night can instill fear, causing people to imagine their fears to be greater than they truly are.
The prophet saith in the psalter, "Thou hast, good Lord, set the darkness and made was the night, and in the night walk all the beasts of the woods, the whelps of the lions roaring and calling unto God for their meat." Now, though the lions' whelps walk about roaring in the night and seek for their prey, yet can they not get such meat as they would always, but must hold themselves content with such as God suffereth to fall in their way. And though they be not aware of it, yet of God they ask it and of him they have it. And this may be comfort to all good men in their night's fear, that though they fall in their dark tribulation into the claws of the devil or the teeth of those lions' whelps, yet all that they can do shall not pass beyond the body, which is but as the garment of the soul. For the soul itself, which is the substance of the man, is so surely fenced in round about with the shield of God, that as long as he will abide faithfully in the hope of God's help the lions' whelp shall not be able to hurt it. For the great Lion himself could never be suffered to go further in the tribulation of Job than God from time to time gave him leave.
The prophet says in the psalter, "You, good Lord, created the darkness and made the night, and in the night, all the beasts of the woods wander, the lion cubs roaring and calling to God for their food." Now, even though the lion cubs roam around roaring at night in search of their prey, they can't always get the food they desire, but they must be content with what God allows to come their way. And even if they are unaware of it, they ask God for it and receive it from Him. This should bring comfort to all good people in their nighttime fears, that even if they fall into the dark troubles and are caught by the devil or the lion cubs, all that they can do will only affect the body, which is just a garment for the soul. For the soul itself, which is the true essence of a person, is so securely protected all around by God's shield that as long as he remains steadfast in the hope of God's help, the lion cubs will not be able to harm it. For the Great Lion Himself was never allowed to go further in Job's trials than God permitted Him to.
And therefore the deep darkness of the midnight maketh men who stand out of faith and out of good hope in God to be in far the greater fear in their tribulation, for lack of the light of faith, by which they might perceive that the uttermost of their peril is a far less thing than they take it for. But we are so wont to set so much by our body, which we see and feel, and in the feeding and fostering of which we set out delight and our wealth; and so little (alas) and so seldom we think upon our soul, because we cannot see that but by spiritual understanding, and most especially by the eye of our faith (in the meditation of which we bestow, God knows, little time), that the loss of our body we take for a sorer thing and for a great deal greater tribulation than we do the loss of our soul. Our Saviour biddeth us not fear those lions' whelps that can but kill our bodies and when that is done have no further thing in their power with which they can do us harm, but he biddeth us stand in dread of him who when he hath slain the body is able then beside to cast the soul into everlasting fire. Yet are we so blind in the dark night of tribulation, for lack of full and fast belief of God's word, that, whereas in the day of prosperity we very little fear God for our soul, our night's fear of adversity maketh us very sore to fear the lion and his whelps for dread of loss of our bodies. And whereas St. Paul in sundry places telleth us that our body is but the garment of the soul, yet the faintness of our faith in the scripture of God maketh us, with the night's fear of tribulation, not only to dread the loss of our body more than that of our soul—that is, of the clothing more than of the substance that is clothed therewith—but also of the very outward goods that serve for the clothing of the body. And much more foolish are we in that dark night's fear than would be a man who would forget the saving of his body for fear of losing his old rain-beaten cloak, that is but the covering of his gown or his coat. Now, consider further yet, that the prophet in the afore-remembered verses saith that in the night there walk not only the lions' whelps but also "all the beasts of the wood." Now, you know that if a man walk through the wood in the night, many things can make him afraid of which in the day he would not be afraid a whit. For in the night every bush, to him that waxeth once afraid, seemeth a thief.
And so, the deep darkness of midnight makes people who lack faith and hope in God much more fearful during their struggles because they can't see that the worst of their dangers is far less than they imagine. We tend to value our bodies, which we can see and feel, and we take pleasure in nurturing them and acquiring wealth for them. Unfortunately, we think so little about our souls because we can only understand them through spiritual insight, especially through faith, which we hardly spend any time contemplating. As a result, we tend to see the loss of our bodies as a much bigger tragedy compared to losing our souls. Our Savior tells us not to fear those who can only kill our bodies, for after that, they can do no more harm. Instead, we should fear Him who, after killing the body, can also throw the soul into eternal fire. Yet we remain blind during our trials, lacking strong belief in God’s word, causing us to fear losing our bodies much more than we fear for our souls during difficult times. Even though St. Paul tells us in various places that our bodies are simply garments for our souls, our weak faith makes us dread losing our bodies more than our souls—valuing the clothing more than that which is clothed—and we also fear losing material possessions that serve our bodies. We are even more foolish in our fears than someone who would forget to protect their body while worrying about losing an old, worn-out cloak that only covers their coat. Moreover, consider that the prophet in the previously mentioned verses states that at night not only the lion’s whelps roam but also "all the beasts of the woods." You know that if someone walks through the woods at night, many things might frighten them that wouldn't bother them at all during the day. At night, every bush, to someone who's already afraid, seems like a thief.
I remember that when I was a young man, I was once in the war with the king then my master (God absolve his soul) and we were camped within the Turk's ground many a mile beyond Belgrade—would God it were ours now as it was then! But so happed it that in our camp about midnight there suddenly rose a rumour and a cry that the Turk's whole army was secretly stealing upon us. Therewith our whole host was warned to arm them in haste and set themselves in array to fight. And then were runners of ours, who had brought those sudden tidings, examined more leisurely by the council, as to what surety or what likelihood they had perceived. And one of them said that by the glimmering of the moon he had espied and perceived and seen them himself, coming on softly and soberly in a long range, all in good order, not one farther forth than the other in the forefront, but as even as a third, and in breadth farther than he could see the length. His fellows, being examined, said that he had somewhat pricked forth before them, and came back so fast to tell it to them that they thought it rather time to make haste and giving warning to the camp than to go nearer unto them. For they were not so far off but what they had yet themselves somewhat an imperfect sight of them, too. Thus stood we on watch all the rest of the night, evermore hearkening when we should hear them come, but "Hush, stand still! Methink I hear a trampling," so that at last many of us thought we heard them ourselves too. But when the day was sprung, and we saw no one, out was our runner sent again, and some of our captains with him, to show whereabout was the place in which he had perceived them. And when they came thither, they found that the great fearful army of the Turks, so soberly coming on, turned (God be thanked) into a fair long hedge standing even stone-still.
I remember when I was young, I was once at war with the king, my master (may God rest his soul), and we were camped on Turkish land many miles beyond Belgrade—oh, how I wish it were ours now as it was then! But it happened that in our camp around midnight, a rumor and a cry suddenly spread that the entire Turkish army was sneaking up on us. Our entire force was quickly alerted to arm themselves and prepare for battle. Then, our scouts, who had brought the urgent news, were questioned more thoroughly by the council about what certainty or likelihood they had observed. One of them said that by the light of the moon, he had seen them silently advancing in a long line, perfectly organized, with no one out of place in the front, as even as could be, and stretching wider than he could see the length. His companions, when questioned, said that he had run ahead of them and returned so quickly to report that they thought it was better to hurry and warn the camp than to get closer. They were not far enough away to have completely lost sight of them, either. So, we kept watch all night, listening closely for their approach, constantly saying, "Hush, stand still! I think I hear some trampling," until many of us were convinced we heard them too. But when dawn broke and we saw no one, we sent our scout back out again, along with some of our captains, to show where he had seen them. When they arrived at the spot, they discovered that the massive, frightening army of the Turks, which had seemed to be approaching so steadily, turned out (thank God) to be just a long, still hedge.
And thus fareth it in the night's fear of tribulation, in which the devil, to bear down and overwhelm with dread the faithful hope that we should have in God, casteth in our imagination much more fear than cause. For since there walk in that night not only the lion's whelps but all the beasts of the wood beside, the beast that we hear roar in the dark night of tribulation, and fear for a lion, we sometimes find well afterward in the way that it was no lion at all, but a silly rude roaring ass. And sometimes the thing that on the sea seemeth a rock is indeed nothing else but a mist. Howbeit, as the prophet saith, he that faithfully dwelleth in the hope of God's help, the shield of his truth shall so fence him round about that, be it an ass or a colt or a lion's whelp, or a rock of stone or a mist, the night's fear thereof shall be nothing to dread.
And so it goes in the night's fear of hardship, where the devil, aiming to crush and overwhelm the faithful hope we should have in God, fills our minds with much more fear than there is reason for. For in that night, it's not just the lion’s cubs that roam, but all the wild animals as well. The beast that we hear roaring in the dark night of tribulation, which we fear to be a lion, we may later discover on our path was not a lion at all, but just a loud, foolish donkey. And sometimes what appears to be a rock at sea is really nothing more than a mist. However, as the prophet says, those who faithfully dwell in the hope of God's help will be protected by the shield of His truth, so that whether it’s a donkey or a colt or a lion’s cub, or a rock of stone or a mist, the night’s fear will be nothing to fear.
XIII
Therefore find I that in the night's fear one great part is the fault of pusillanimity; that is, of faint and feeble stomach, by which a man for faint heart is afraid where he needeth not. By reason of this, he flieth oftentime for fear of something of which, if he fled not, he should take no harm. And a man doth sometimes by his fleeing make an enemy bold on him, who would, if he fled not but dared abide, give over and fly from him.
Therefore, I find that a large part of fear at night is due to cowardice; in other words, a weak and timid spirit that causes a person to be afraid when there's no real reason to be. Because of this, he often runs away from something that, if he faced it, wouldn't harm him. Sometimes, by running away, a person actually encourages an enemy who, if he didn't flee and instead stood his ground, would back off and run away himself.
This fault of pusillanimity maketh a man in his tribulation first, for feeble heart, impatient. And afterward oftentimes it driveth him by impatience into a contrary affection, making him frowardly stubborn and angry against God, and thereby to fall into blasphemy, as do the damned souls in hell. This fault of pusillanimity and timorous mind hindereth a man also many times from doing many good things which, if he took a good stomach to him in the trust of God's help, he would be well able to do. But the devil casteth him in a cowardice and maketh him take it for humility to think himself unfit and unable to do them. And therefore he leaveth undone the good thing of which God offereth him occasion and to which he had made him fit.
This flaw of being timid makes a person feel troubled at first, leading to a weak heart and impatience. Often, this impatience then pushes him into a negative mindset, causing him to become stubborn and angry with God, which can lead to blasphemy, similar to the souls in hell. This issue of being timid and fearful also frequently prevents a person from doing many good things that, if he approached with confidence and trust in God's help, he would be capable of achieving. However, the devil makes him feel cowardly and convinces him that believing himself unfit and unable to act is a form of humility. As a result, he neglects the good things that God presents him with and for which he has been made capable.
But such folk have need to lift up their hearts and call upon God, and by the counsel of other good spiritual folk to cast away the cowardice of their own conceiving which the night's fear by the devil hath framed in their fancy. And they have need to look in the gospel upon him who laid up his talent and left it unoccupied and therefore utterly lost it, with a great reproach of his pusillanimity, but which he had thought to have excused himself, in that he was afraid to put it forth into use and occupy it.
But people like that need to lift their spirits and turn to God, and with the help of other good spiritual folks, they should reject the cowardice created by their own imagination, which the devil has stirred up during the night. They need to reflect on the Gospel story of the man who buried his talent and left it unused, ultimately losing it and facing harsh criticism for his timidity, even though he thought he could justify himself by claiming he was too afraid to put it to use.
And all this fear cometh by the devil's drift, wherein he taketh occasion of the faintness of our good and sure trust in God. And therefore let us faithfully dwell in the good hope of his help, and then shall the shield of his truth so compass us about that of this night's fear we shall have no fear at all.
And all this fear comes from the devil's influence, where he takes advantage of our wavering faith and trust in God. So, let’s hold steadfastly to the good hope of His help, and then the shield of His truth will surround us so that we won’t fear anything this night.
XIV
This pusillanimity bringeth forth, by the night's fear, a very timorous daughter, a silly wretched girl and ever whining, who is called Scrupulosity, or a scrupulous conscience.
This cowardice gives rise, in the fear of night, to a very timid daughter, a pitiful and whiny girl, who is called Scrupulosity, or a scrupulous conscience.
This girl is a good enough maidservant in a house, never idle but ever occupied and busy. But albeit she hath a very gentle mistress who loveth her well and is well content with what she doth—or, if all be not well (as all cannot always be well), is content to pardon her as she doth others of her fellows, and letteth her know that she will do so—yet can this peevish girl never cease whining and puling for fear lest her mistress be always angry with her and she shall severely be chidden. Would her mistress, think you, be likely to be content with this condition? Nay, surely not.
This girl is a decent maid in the house, always busy and never idle. Although she has a very kind mistress who loves her and is generally happy with her work—or, if things aren’t perfect (and they often aren’t), is willing to forgive her like she does with the others, and lets her know she will—this moody girl can't stop complaining and acting pitiful, worried that her mistress is always upset with her and that she'll be scolded harshly. Do you think her mistress would be okay with this situation? No, definitely not.
I knew such a one myself, whose mistress was a very wise woman and (a thing which is in women very rare) very mild also and meek, and liked very well such service as she did her in the house. But she so much misliked this continual discomfortable fashion of hers that she would sometimes say, "Eh, what aileth this girl? The elvish urchin thinketh I were a devil, I do believe. Surely if she did me ten times better service than she doth, yet with this fantastical fear of hers I would be loth to have her in mine house."
I knew someone like that, whose mistress was a really wise woman and (which is quite rare in women) also very gentle and kind. She appreciated the service she provided in the household. However, she disliked her constant, uncomfortable behavior so much that she would sometimes say, "What’s wrong with this girl? The mischievous little thing thinks I’m a devil, I truly believe. Even if she did ten times better service than she does now, with her strange fears, I wouldn’t want her in my house."
Thus fareth, lo, the scrupulous person, who frameth himself many times double the fear that he hath cause, and many times a great fear where there is no cause at all. And of that which is indeed no sin, he maketh a venial one. And that which is venial, he imagineth to be deadly—and yet, for all that, he falleth into them, since they are of their nature such as no man long liveth without. And then he feareth that he is never fully confessed nor fully contrite, and then that his sins be never fully forgiven him. And then he confesseth and confesseth again, and cumbereth himself and his confessor both. And then every prayer that he saith, though he say it as well as the frail infirmity of the man will suffer, yet he is not satisfied unless he say it again, and yet after that again. And when he hath said the same thing thrice, as little is he satisfied with the last time as the first. And then is his heart evermore in heaviness, unquiet, and fear, full of doubt and dullness, without comfort or spiritual consolation.
So here's the situation: the overly scrupulous person often creates twice the fear they actually have, and many times feels intense fear where there’s no reason at all. They turn things that are really not sins into minor ones, and what’s minor, they think is a serious sin—and still, despite this, they end up committing them because they’re naturally things no one can avoid for long. Then they worry that they're never truly confessed or genuinely sorry, and fear their sins are never completely forgiven. They confess repeatedly and burden both themselves and their confessor. Every prayer they say, even if they do their best given their human weaknesses, doesn’t satisfy them unless they say it again, and then again. After saying the same thing three times, they are just as unsatisfied with the last instance as they were with the first. Their heart remains heavy, restless, fearful, filled with doubt and dullness, lacking comfort or spiritual consolation.
With this night's fear the devil sore troubleth the mind of many a right good man, and that doth he to bring him to some great evil. For he will, if he can, drive him so much to the fearful minding of God's rigorous justice, that he will keep him from the comfortable remembrance of God's great mighty mercy, and so make him do all his good works wearily and without consolation or quickness.
With the fear of this night, the devil seriously troubles the minds of many good people, and he does this to lead them into serious wrongdoing. He will, if he can, push them to focus so much on God's strict justice that they forget about God's immense mercy, leading them to do all their good deeds tiredly and without comfort or enthusiasm.
Moreover, he maketh him take for a sin something that is not one, and for a deadly sin one that is but venial, to the intent that when he shall fall into them he shall, by reason of his scruple, sin where otherwise he would not, or sin mortally (because his conscience, in doing the deed, so told him) where otherwise indeed he would have offended only venially.
Moreover, he makes him believe that something is a sin when it’s not, and that a minor sin is a serious one, so that when he actually commits them, his scruples will lead him to sin in ways he otherwise wouldn't, or to commit a serious sin (because his conscience made him think so) when he would have only sinned in a minor way otherwise.
Yes, and further, the devil longeth to make all his good works and spiritual exercises so painful and so tedious to him, that, with some other subtle suggestion or false wily doctrine of a false spiritual liberty, he should be easily conveyed from that evil fault into one much worse, for the false ease and pleasure that he should suddenly find therein. And then should he have his conscience as wide and large afterward as ever it was narrow and straight before. For better is yet, of truth, a conscience a little too narrow than a little too large.
Yes, and additionally, the devil desires to make all his good deeds and spiritual practices so painful and so tedious for him that, through some clever suggestion or misleading doctrine of a fake spiritual freedom, he could easily shift from that evil habit to one much worse, due to the false comfort and pleasure he would suddenly find in it. And then his conscience would be as expansive and broad afterward as it once was narrow and constrained. For in truth, it's better to have a conscience that's a bit too narrow than one that's a bit too broad.
My mother had, when I was a little boy, a good old woman who took care of her children. They called her Mother Maud—I daresay you have heard of her?
My mom had, when I was a little kid, a nice old woman who looked after her children. They called her Mother Maud—I’m sure you’ve heard of her?
VINCENT: Yea, yea, very much.
Yeah, definitely.
ANTHONY: She was wont, when she sat by the fire with us, to tell us who were children many childish tales. But as Pliny saith that there is no book lightly so bad but that a man may pick some good thing out of it, so think I that there is almost no tale so foolish but that yet in one matter or another, it may hap to serve to some purpose.
ANTHONY: She used to sit by the fire with us and tell us kids a bunch of silly stories. But just as Pliny says that there’s hardly a book so bad that you can’t find something useful in it, I think there’s almost no story so foolish that it can’t be good for something at least.
For I remember me that among others of her foolish tales, she told us once that the ass and the wolf came upon a time to confession to the fox. The poor ass came to shrift in Shrovetide, a day or two before Ash Wednesday. But the wolf would not come to confession till he saw first Palm Sunday past, and then he put it off yet further until Good Friday.
For I remember that among her silly stories, she once told us that the donkey and the wolf came to confess to the fox. The poor donkey went to confession on Shrovetide, a day or two before Ash Wednesday. But the wolf refused to confess until after Palm Sunday, and then he pushed it off even more until Good Friday.
The fox asked the ass, before he began "Benedicite," wherefore he came to confession so soon, before Lent began. The poor beast answered him that it was for fear of deadly sin, if he should lose his part of any of those prayers that the priests in the cleansing days pray for them who are then confessed already. Then in his shrift he had a marvellous grudge in his inward conscience, that he had one day given his master a cause of anger in that, with his rude roaring before his master arose, he had wakened him out of his sleep and bereaved him of his rest. The fox, for that fault, like a good discreet confessor, charged him to do so no more, but to lie still and sleep like a good son himself until his master were up and ready to go to work, and so should he be sure that he should wake him no more.
The fox asked the donkey, before he started "Benedicite," why he came to confession so early, before Lent had begun. The poor creature replied that he was afraid of committing a serious sin, if he missed out on any of the prayers that the priests say for those who are already confessed during the cleansing days. During his confession, he felt a deep guilt in his conscience because he had once made his master angry by waking him from his sleep with his loud braying. The fox, acting like a wise and understanding confessor, advised him not to do that again, but to stay quiet and sleep like a good son until his master was up and ready to work, assuring him that this way, he wouldn’t wake him anymore.
To tell you all the poor ass's confession, it would be a long work. For everything that he did was deadly sin with him, the poor soul was so scrupulous. But his wise wily confessor accounted them for trifles (as they were) and swore afterward to the badger that he was so weary to sit so long and hear him that, saving for the sake of manners, he had rather have sat all that time at breakfast with a good fat goose. But when it came to the giving of the penance, the fox found that the most weighty sin in all his shrift was gluttony. And therefore he discreetly gave him in penance that he should never for greediness of his food do any other beast any harm or hindrance. And then he should eat his food and worry no more.
To share the poor donkey’s confession would take a while. Everything he did felt like a serious sin to him; the poor guy was overly anxious about it all. But his clever confessor saw them as minor issues (which they were) and later told the badger that he was so tired from listening for so long that, out of politeness, he would have preferred to spend that time having breakfast with a nice fat goose. However, when it came time to assign penance, the fox realized that the biggest sin in all his confessions was gluttony. So, he wisely instructed him to never let his greed for food cause harm or trouble to any other animal. After that, he should just enjoy his meals and not worry anymore.
Now, as good Mother Maud told us, when the wolf came to Father Reynard (that was, she said, the fox's name) to confession upon Good Friday, his confessor shook his great pair of beads at him, almost as big as bowling balls, and asked him wherefore he came so late. "Forsooth, Father Reynard," quoth he, "I must needs tell you the truth—I come, you know, for that. I dared not come sooner for fear lest you would, for my gluttony, have given me in penance to fast some part of this Lent." "Nay, nay," quoth Father Fox, "I am not so unreasonable, for I fast none of it myself. For I may say to thee, son, between us twain here in confession, it is no commandment of God, this fasting, but an invention of man. The priests make folk fast, and then put them to trouble about the moonshine in the water, and do but make folk fools. But they shall make me no such fool, I warrant thee, son, for I ate flesh all this Lent, myself. Howbeit indeed, because I will not be occasion of slander, I ate it secretly in my chamber, out of sight of all such foolish brethren as for their weak scrupulous conscience would wax offended by it. And so would I counsel you to do." "Forsooth, Father Fox," quoth the wolf, "and so, thank God, I do, as near as I can. For when I go to my meal, I take no other company with me but such sure brethren as are of mine own nature, whose consciences are not weak, I warrant you, but their stomachs are as strong as mine." "Well, then, no matter," quoth Father Fox. But when he heard afterward, by his confession, that he was so great a ravener that he devoured and spent sometimes so much victuals at a meal that the price of them would well keep some poor man with his wife and children almost all the week, then he prudently reproved that point in him, and preached him a sermon of his own temperance. For he never used, he said, to pass the value of sixpence at a meal—no, nor even that much, "For when I bring home a goose," quoth he, "it is not out of the poulterer's shop, where folk find them with their feathers ready plucked and see which is the fattest, and yet for sixpence buy and choose the best; but out of the housewife's house, at first hand, which can supply them somewhat cheaper, you know, than the poulterer can. Nor yet can I be suffered to see them plucked, and stand and choose them by day, but am fain by night to take one at adventure. And when I come home, I am fain to do the labour to pluck it myself too. Yet, for all this, though it be but lean and, I know, not well worth a groat, it serveth me sometimes both for dinner and for supper too. As for the fact that you live of ravine, I can find no fault in that. You have used it so long that I think you can do no otherwise, and therefore it would be folly to forbid it to you—and, to say the truth, against good conscience too. For live you must, I know, and other craft know you none, and therefore, as reason is, must you live by that. But yet, you know, too much is too much, and measure is a merry mean, which I perceive by your shrift you have never used to keep. And therefore surely this shall be your penance, that you shall all this year never pass the price of sixpence at a meal, as near as your conscience can guess the price."
Now, as good Mother Maud told us, when the wolf came to Father Reynard (that was, she said, the fox's name) for confession on Good Friday, his confessor shook his large set of beads at him, almost as big as bowling balls, and asked him why he came so late. "Well, Father Reynard," he said, "I have to tell you the truth—I came, you know, for that. I didn’t dare come sooner for fear that you’d have made me fast for some part of Lent due to my gluttony." "No, no," replied Father Fox, "I’m not that unreasonable, since I don’t fast myself. I can tell you, my son, between us here in confession, that fasting is no commandment from God but a human invention. The priests make people fast and then worry them about the moonshine in the water, just making fools of them. But they won't make a fool out of me, I assure you, for I ate meat all through Lent. However, because I don’t want to cause any scandal, I ate it privately in my room, away from all those foolish brothers who might be offended due to their weak consciences. And I’d advise you to do the same." "Indeed, Father Fox," said the wolf, "and thank God, I do that as much as I can. For when I go to eat, I only take along those brothers who are of my kind, whose consciences are not weak, I assure you, but their stomachs are as strong as mine." "Well then, that’s fine," said Father Fox. But when he later heard in confession that the wolf was such a glutton that he sometimes consumed so much food in one meal that the cost of it could well support a poor man and his family for nearly a week, he wisely addressed that issue and lectured him on his own temperance. He explained that he never spent more than sixpence on a meal—no, not even that much, "For when I bring home a goose," he said, "I don't get it from the butcher’s shop, where they have them all plucked and you can choose the fattest for sixpence; instead, I get it directly from the housewife, who can sell them somewhat cheaper than the butcher. And I can’t even stand by during the day to pick one out; I have to take one at random at night. When I get home, I have to pluck it myself too. Yet, for all that, even though it may be lean and, I know, not worth a groat, it sometimes serves me for both lunch and dinner. As for the fact that you live by scavenging, I can't fault you for that. You've been doing it for so long that I think you can't do anything else, so it would be foolish to forbid it—and truthfully, it goes against good conscience too. You have to live, I know, and you don’t know any other trade, so it’s only reasonable that you have to sustain yourself with that. But you know, too much is too much, and moderation is a happy medium, which I see from your confession you haven’t managed to maintain. So surely this will be your penance: that for this entire year, you shall not spend more than the price of sixpence on a meal, as close as your conscience can estimate the cost."
Their shrift have I told you, as Mother Maud told it to us. But now serveth for our matter the conscience of them both in the true performing of their penance. The poor ass after his shrift, when he waxed an-hungered, saw a sow lie with her pigs, well lapped in new straw. And he drew near and thought to have eaten of the straw, but anon his scrupulous conscience began therein to grudge him. For since his penance was that, for greediness of his good, he should do nobody else any harm, he thought he might not eat one straw there lest, for lack of that straw, some of those pigs might hap to die for cold. So he held still his hunger until someone brought him food. But when he was about to fall to it, then fell he yet into a far further scruple. For then it came in his mind that he should yet break his penance if he should eat any of that either, since he was commanded by his ghostly father that he should not, for his own food, hinder any other beast. For he thought that if he ate not that food, some other beast might hap to have it. And so should he, by the eating of it, peradventure hinder another. And thus stayed he still fasting till, when he told the cause, his ghostly father came and informed him better, and then he cast off that scruple and fell mannerly to his meal, and was a right honest ass many a fair day after.
I've shared their confession as Mother Maud relayed it to us. But now, what's important for our discussion is the conscience of both in truly performing their penance. The poor donkey, after his confession, when he got hungry, saw a pig lying with her piglets, comfortably nestled in fresh straw. He approached, thinking of eating some of the straw, but then his anxious conscience started bothering him. Since his penance was to refrain from harming anyone else due to his greed, he thought he couldn't eat even one piece of straw, as it might cause some of those piglets to suffer from the cold without it. So he endured his hunger until someone brought him food. But just as he was about to dig in, he fell into a deeper dilemma. He realized that eating that food might also break his penance since his spiritual advisor had instructed him not to deprive any other animal for his own sake. He figured that if he didn’t eat that food, another animal might need it, and by eating it, he might accidentally harm another. So he kept fasting until, when he explained his reasoning, his spiritual advisor came and clarified things for him, leading him to dismiss that worry and enjoy his meal. From then on, he was a genuinely good donkey for many days after.
The wolf now, coming from shrift clean absolved from his sins, went about to do as a certain shrewish wife once told her husband that she would do, when she came from shrift. "Be merry, man," quoth she now, "for this day, I thank God, I was well shriven. And I purpose now therefore to leave off all mine old shrewishness and begin even afresh!"
The wolf, now fresh from confession and cleared of his sins, set out to do what a certain nagging wife once told her husband she would do after confession. "Be happy, my man," she said now, "because today, I thank God, I was properly absolved. And I plan to stop all my old nagging and start anew!"
VINCENT: Ah, well, uncle, can you report her so? That word I heard her speak, but she said it in sport to make her goodman laugh.
VINCENT: Ah, well, uncle, can you really say that about her? I heard her say that word, but she was just joking to make her partner laugh.
ANTHONY: Indeed, it seemed she spoke it half in sport. For in that she said she would cast away all her old shrewishness, therein I daresay she sported. But in that she said she would begin it all afresh, her husband found that in good earnest!
ANTHONY: Honestly, it felt like she was only joking when she said she’d get rid of all her old nagging ways. I bet she was just playing around with that. But when she mentioned starting over completely, her husband realized she was serious about that!
VINCENT: Well, I shall tell her what you say, I warrant you.
VINCENT: Well, I'll definitely tell her what you said, I promise.
ANTHONY: Then will you make me make my word good!
ANTHONY: Then will you help me keep my promise!
But whatsoever she did, at least so fared now this wolf, who had cast out in confession all his old ravine. For then hunger pricked him forward so that, as the shrewish wife said, he should begin all afresh. But yet the prick of conscience withdrew him and held him back, because he would not, for breaking of his penance, take any prey for his mealtide that should pass the price of sixpence.
But whatever she did, that’s how things went for this wolf, who had confessed and let go of his old ways. His hunger pushed him onward, so as the nagging wife said, he should start over. But the nagging feeling of guilt held him back because he didn’t want to break his penance by taking any food that cost more than sixpence.
It happed him then, as he walked prowling for his gear about, that he came where a man had, a few days before, cast off two old lean and lame horses, so sick that no flesh was there left upon them. And the one, when the wolf came by, could scant stand on his legs, and the other was already dead and his skin ripped off and carried away. And as he looked upon them suddenly, he was first about to feed upon them and whet his teeth upon their bones. But as he looked aside, he spied a fair cow in an enclosure, walking with her young calf by her side. And as soon as he saw them, his conscience began to grudge him against both those two horses. And then he sighed and said to himself, "Alas, wicked wretch that I am, I had almost broken my penance ere I was aware! For yonder dead horse, because I never sad a dead horse sold in the market, even if I should die for it, I cannot guess, to save my sinful soul, what price I should set on him. But in my conscience I set him far above sixpence, and therefore I dare not meddle with him. Now, then, yonder live horse is in all likelihood worth a great deal of money. For horses are dear in this country—especially such soft amblers, for I see by his pace he trotteth not, nor can scant shift a foot. And therefore I may not meddle with him, for he very far passeth my sixpence. But cows this country hath enough, while money have they very little. And therefore, considering the plenty of the cows and the scarcity of the money, yonder foolish cow seemeth unto me, in my conscience, worth not past a groat, if she be worth so much. Now then, her calf is not so much as she, by half. And therefore, since the cow is in my conscience worth but fourpence, my conscience cannot serve me, for sin of my soul, to appraise her calf above twopence. And so pass they not sixpence between them both. And therefore may I well eat them twain at this one meal and break not my penance at all." And so thereupon he did, without any scruple of conscience.
As he was wandering around looking for his gear, he came across a man who had recently abandoned two old, sickly horses that were so emaciated there was hardly any flesh left on them. One horse could barely stand when a wolf approached, and the other was already dead, its skin removed and taken away. He looked at them and thought about feeding on their bones. But then he noticed a lovely cow in a pen, walking alongside her young calf. The sight of them made him feel guilty about the two horses. He sighed and said to himself, "Oh, what a wicked person I am! I almost broke my penance without realizing it! That dead horse—since I’ve never seen a dead horse sold at market—I can’t even guess what its value would be, even if it meant my life. But in my conscience, I value it way above sixpence, so I can’t touch it. Now, that live horse is probably worth quite a bit. Horses are expensive around here—especially those gentle ones. I can tell by its gait that it doesn’t trot and can hardly move. So I can’t touch that either, since it is clearly worth more than sixpence. But there are plenty of cows in this area, while money is rare. So, considering that there are lots of cows but little money, that silly cow seems to me worth no more than a groat, if at all. Now, the calf is worth even less than the cow, probably half as much. So, since the cow is worth only fourpence in my conscience, I can’t value her calf at more than twopence for the sake of my soul. Together, they don’t even add up to sixpence. So I can easily eat both of them in one meal without breaking my penance.” And so he did, without any guilt.
If such beasts could speak now, as Mother Maud said they could then, some of them would, I daresay, tell a tale almost as wise as this! Save for the diminishing of old Mother Maud's tale, a shorter sermon would have served. But yet, as childish as the parable is, in this it serveth for our purpose: that the night's fear of a somewhat scrupulous conscience, though it be painful and troublous to him who hath it, as this poor ass had here, is yet less harm than a conscience that is over-large. And less harm is it than a conscience such as a man pleases to frame himself for his own fancy—now drawing it narrow, now stretching it in breadth, after the manner of a leather thong—to serve on every side for his own commodity, as did here the wily wolf.
If those creatures could talk now, like Mother Maud claimed they could back then, some of them would probably share a story that's almost as wise as this one! Besides the shortening of old Mother Maud's story, a brief sermon would have done just fine. Still, as childish as the fable is, it serves our purpose: the fear of a somewhat anxious conscience, although it’s painful and troubling for the one who carries it, like this poor donkey did, is still less harmful than a conscience that’s overly broad. It’s also less damaging than a conscience that someone shapes for their own liking—sometimes tightening it, other times stretching it like a leather strap—to benefit themselves in every situation, just like the crafty wolf did here.
But such folk are out of tribulation, and comfort need they none, and therefore are they out of our matter. But he who is in the night's fear of his own scrupulous conscience, let him well beware, as I said, that the devil draw him not, for weariness of the one, into the other, and while he would fly from Scilla draw him into Charibdis. He must do as doth a ship coming into a haven in the mouth of which lie secret rocks under the water on both sides. If by mishap he be entered in among them that are on the one side, and cannot tell how to get out, he must get a substantial clever pilot who can so conduct him from the rocks on that side that yet he bring him not into those that are on the other side, but can guide him in the mid way. Let them, I say therefore, who are in the troublous fear of heir own scrupulous conscience, submit the rule of their conscience to the counsel of some other good man, who after the variety and the nature of the scruples may temper his advice.
But those people are free from trouble and don't need comfort, so they aren't our concern. However, if someone is struggling with fear from their own guilty conscience, they need to be careful, as I mentioned, not to let the devil lead them from one danger into another. While trying to escape Scylla, they might be pulled into Charybdis. They need to act like a ship approaching a harbor that has hidden rocks on both sides. If by chance they get caught among the rocks on one side and can't figure out how to escape, they need to find a skilled pilot who can navigate them away from those rocks without leading them into the ones on the opposite side, guiding them safely in between. So, I say that those who are troubled by their own guilty conscience should trust the guidance of a good person who can offer balanced advice based on the variety and nature of their concerns.
Yea, although a man be very well learned himself, yet if he be in this state let him learn the custom used among physicians. For if one of them be never so learned, yet in his own disease and sickness he never useth to trust all to himself, but sendeth for such of his fellows as he knoweth to be able, and putteth himself in their hands. This he doth for many considerations, and one of the causes is fear. For upon some tokens in his own sickness he may conceive a great deal more fear than needeth, and then it would be good for his health if for the time he knew no such thing at all.
Yes, even if a person is very knowledgeable, if they find themselves in a certain situation, they should learn the customs practiced by doctors. Because if a doctor is highly educated, when faced with their own illness, they don’t rely solely on themselves; they call in colleagues they trust who have the skills to help and put themselves in their hands. They do this for various reasons, one being fear. When experiencing certain symptoms, they can become much more fearful than is necessary, and it might actually be better for their well-being if they didn’t know about those symptoms at all.
I knew once in this town one of the most learned men in that profession and the most expert, and the most famous too, and him who did the greatest cures upon other men. And yet when he was himself once very sore sick, I heard his fellows who then took care of him—every one of whom would, in his own disease, have used his help before that of any other man—wish that yet, while his own sickness was so sore, he had known no physic at all. He took so great heed unto every suspicious token, and feared so far the worst, that his fear did him sometimes much more harm than the sickness gave him cause.
I once knew in this town one of the smartest and most skilled men in his field, who was also the most famous and had performed the greatest cures on others. Yet, when he himself fell seriously ill, I heard his colleagues, each of whom would have sought his help for their own ailments, wish that during his own severe illness, he had not known anything about medicine. He paid so much attention to every troubling symptom and worried so much about the worst that his anxiety often caused him more harm than the illness itself.
And therefore, as I say, whosoever hath such a trouble of his scrupulous conscience, let him for a while forbear the judgment of himself, and follow the counsel of some other man whom he knoweth for well learned and virtuous. And especially in the place of confession, for these is God specially present with his grace assisting the sacrament. And let him not doubt to quiet his mind and follow what he is there bidden, and think for a while less of the fear of God's justice, and be more merry in remembrance of his mercy, and persevere in prayer for grace, and abide and dwell faithfully in the sure hope of his help. And then shall he find, without any doubt, that the shield of God's truth shall, as the prophet saith, so compass him about, that he shall not dread this night's fear of scrupulosity, but shall have afterward his conscience established in good quiet and rest.
And so, as I say, anyone who struggles with a troubled conscience should take a break from judging themselves and seek the advice of someone they know is knowledgeable and virtuous. Especially in the context of confession, because God is particularly present there, giving grace to support the sacrament. They shouldn’t hesitate to calm their mind and follow the guidance given, focusing less on the fear of God's justice and more on the joy of His mercy. They should keep praying for grace and remain steadfast in the hope of His help. Then, without a doubt, they will find that the protection of God's truth, as the prophet says, will surround them, so they won’t fear the anxieties of scrupulosity at night but will have their conscience settled in peace and rest.
XV
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, you have in my mind well declared these kinds of the night's fear.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, you have clearly expressed in my mind these types of fear that come at night.
ANTHONY: Surely, cousin, but yet are there many more than I can either remember or find. Howbeit, one yet cometh now to my mind, of which I thought not before, and which is yet in mine opinion. That is, cousin, where the devil tempteth a man to kill and destroy himself.
ANTHONY: Surely, cousin, but there are still many more than I can remember or find. However, one just came to mind that I hadn't thought of before, and it's still on my mind. That is, cousin, when the devil tempts a man to kill and destroy himself.
VINCENT: Undoubtedly this kind of tribulation is marvellous and strange. And the temptation is of such a sort that some men have the opinion that those who once fall into that fantasy can never fully cast it off.
VINCENT: Without a doubt, this kind of struggle is amazing and odd. And the temptation is such that some people believe those who get caught up in that illusion can never fully shake it off.
ANTHONY: Yes, yes, cousin, many a hundred, and else God forbid. But the thing that maketh men so to say is that, of those who finally do destroy themselves, there is much speech and much wondering, as it is well worthy. But many a good man and woman hath sometime—yea, for some years, once after another—continually been tempted to do it, and yet hath, by grace and good counsel, well and virtuously withstood that temptation, and been in conclusion clearly delivered of it. And their tribulation is not known abroad and therefore not talked of.
ANTHONY: Yes, yes, cousin, many times over, and may God forbid it. But the reason people talk so much about those who do end up taking their own lives is that it’s a significant issue worth discussing. However, many good men and women have faced that temptation repeatedly over the years and, through grace and good advice, have successfully resisted it and ultimately overcome it. Their struggles often go unnoticed and therefore aren’t talked about.
But surely, cousin, a horrible sore trouble it is to any man or woman whom the devil tempteth with that temptation. Many have I heard of, and with some have I talked myself, who have been sore cumbered with it, and I have marked not a little the manner of them.
But surely, cousin, it’s a terrible burden for anyone, man or woman, whom the devil tempts with that temptation. I’ve heard of many, and I’ve talked with some myself, who have struggled greatly with it, and I’ve noticed quite a bit about how they behave.
VINCENT: I pray you, good uncle, show me somewhat of such things as you perceive therein. For first, whereas you call the kind of temptation the daughter of pusillanimity and thereby so near of kin to the night's fear, methinketh on the other hand that it is rather a thing that cometh of a great courage and boldness. For they dare with their own hands to put themselves to death, from which we see almost every man shrink and flee, and many of them we know by good proof and plain experience for men of great heart and excellent bold courage.
VINCENT: I ask you, good uncle, to share with me what you see in this. First, while you say that this kind of temptation is linked to cowardice and is closely related to the fear of the night, I think it actually comes from a great deal of courage and boldness. Those who dare to take their own lives are doing something that most people shy away from, and we know from solid evidence and clear experience that many of them are truly courageous and brave individuals.
ANTHONY: I said, Cousin Vincent, that of pusillanimity cometh this temptation, and very truth it is that indeed so it doth. But yet I meant not that only of faint heart and fear it cometh and growth always. For the devil tempteth sundry folk by sundry ways.
ANTHONY: I said, Cousin Vincent, that this temptation comes from weakness, and it’s true that it does. But I didn’t mean to say it only arises from being faint-hearted and afraid. The devil tempts different people in different ways.
But I spoke of no other kind of that temptation save only that one which is the daughter that the devil begetteth upon pusillanimity, because those other kinds of temptation fall not under the nature of tribulation and fear, and therefore fall they far out of our matter here. They are such temptations as need only counsel, and not comfort or consolation, because the persons tempted with them are not troubled in their mind with that kind of temptation. but are very well content both in the tempting and in the following. For some have there been, cousin, such that they have been tempted to do it by means of a foolish pride, and some by means of anger, without any fear at all—and very glad to go thereto, I deny not. But if you think that none fall into it by fear, but that they have all a mighty strong stomach, that shall you well see to be the contrary. And that peradventure in those of whom you would think the stomach more strong and their heart and courage most bold.
But I only talked about that one specific type of temptation that comes from the devil's influence on weakness, because other kinds of temptation don't involve suffering or fear, and therefore aren't relevant to our discussion here. Those other temptations only require advice, not comfort or consolation, since the people facing them aren't distressed by that kind of temptation but are quite content with both the temptation itself and the outcome. Some have indeed been tempted by foolish pride, and others by anger, without any fear—and they were happy to go along with it, I won't deny that. However, if you believe that no one falls into it out of fear, but that everyone has a very strong will, you'll soon see that's not true. In fact, it might be most evident in those you'd expect to be the strongest and most courageous.
VINCENT: Yet is it marvel to me, uncle, that it should be as you say it is—that this temptation is unto them that do it for pride or anger no tribulation, or that they should not need, in so great a distress and peril, both of body and soul to be lost, no manner of good ghostly comfort.
VINCENT: I'm still amazed, uncle, that what you say is true—that this temptation doesn’t bring any trouble to those who act out of pride or anger, or that they wouldn’t need any kind of spiritual comfort in such a time of great distress and danger for both body and soul.
ANTHONY: Let us therefore, cousin, consider an example or two, for thereby shall we better perceive it.
ANTHONY: So, cousin, let's look at a couple of examples, as that will help us understand it better.
There was here in Buda in King Ladilaus' days, a good poor honest man's wife. This woman was so fiendish that the devil, perceiving her nature, put her in the mind that she should anger her husband so sore that she might give him occasion to kill her, and then should he be hanged because of her.
There was a good, honest poor man's wife back in Buda during King Ladilaus' time. This woman was so wicked that the devil, noticing her nature, inspired her to provoke her husband to such an extent that he would be pushed to kill her, which would then lead to him being hanged because of it.
VINCENT: This was a strange temptation indeed! What the devil should she be the better then?
VINCENT: This was a really odd temptation! What on earth should she gain from it?
ANTHONY: Nothing, but that it eased her shrewish stomach beforehand, to think that her husband should be hanged afterward. And peradventure, if you look about the world and consider it well, you shall find more such stomachs than a few. Have you never heard a furious body plainly say that, to see such-and-such man have a mischief, he would with good will be content to lie as long in hell as God liveth in heaven?
ANTHONY: Nothing, but it calmed her nagging stomach beforehand, to think that her husband would be hanged later. And if you really look around and think about it, you'll find more people like that than you might expect. Haven't you ever heard someone angrily say that, to see a certain person suffer, they would gladly spend forever in hell as long as God lives in heaven?
VINCENT: Forsooth, and some such have I heard.
VINCENT: Truly, I have heard something like that.
ANTHONY: This mind of his was not much less mad than hers, but rather perhaps the more mad of the twain. For the woman peradventure did not cast so far peril therein.
ANTHONY: This guy's mind was probably just as crazy as hers, but maybe even crazier. Because the woman might not have been risking as much.
But to tell you now to what good pass her charitable purpose came: As her husband (the man was a carpenter) stood hewing with his chip axe upon a piece of timber, she began after her old guise to revile him so that he waxed wroth at last, and bade her get herself in or he would lay the helm of his axe about her back. And he said also that it would be little sin even with that axe head to chop off the unhappy head of hers that carried such an ungracious tongue in it. At that word the devil took his time and whetted her tongue against her teeth. And when it was well sharpened she swore to him in very fierce anger, "By the mass, whoreson husband, I wish thou wouldst! Here lieth my head, lo," and with that down she laid her head upon the same timber log. "If thou smite it not off, I beshrew thine whoreson's heart!" With that, likewise as the devil stood at her elbow, so stood (as I heard say) his good angel at his, and gave him ghostly courage and bade him be bold and do it. And so the good man up with his chip axe and at a chop he chopped off her head indeed.
But let me tell you how her charitable intentions turned out: While her husband (the guy was a carpenter) was busy chopping wood with his axe, she began, as usual, to insult him until he got really angry and told her to go inside or he would hit her with the axe. He also said it wouldn’t be much of a sin to chop off the head of someone with such a nasty mouth. At those words, the devil took his chance and sharpened her tongue against her teeth. When it was sharp enough, she fiercely swore at him, “By God, worthless husband, I wish you would! Here’s my head, look,” and she laid her head down on the timber log. “If you don’t chop it off, I’ll curse your heart!” With that, just as the devil was by her side, his good angel was there too, giving him the courage to go through with it. So the good man raised his axe and, with one swing, chopped off her head for real.
There were other folk standing by, who had a good sport to hear her chide, but little they looked for this chance, till it was done ere they could stop it. They said they heard her tongue babble in her head, and call, "Whoreson, whoreson!" twice after the head was off the body. At least, thus they all reported afterward unto the king, except only one, and that was a woman, and she said that she heard it not.
There were other people around who enjoyed watching her scold, but they didn't expect this to happen until it was over before they could intervene. They claimed they heard her voice mumbling in her head, yelling, "Son of a whore, son of a whore!" twice after the head was removed from the body. At least, that's what everyone told the king afterward, except for one person, a woman, who said she didn't hear anything.
VINCENT: Forsooth, this was a wonderful work! What became, uncle, of the man?
VINCENT: Seriously, this was an amazing piece of work! What happened to the man, uncle?
ANTHONY: The king gave him his pardon.
ANTHONY: The king let him off.
VINCENT: Verily, he might in conscience do no less.
VINCENT: Truly, he couldn't in good conscience do anything less.
ANTHONY: But then was there almost made a statute that in such a case there should never after be granted a pardon, but (if the truth were able to be proved) no husband should need any pardon, but should have leave by the law to follow the example of that carpenter, and do the same.
ANTHONY: But then wasn't there a law that said in such cases a pardon would never be granted again? If the truth could be proven, no husband would need any pardon. He would have the legal right to follow the example of that carpenter and do the same thing.
VINCENT: How happed it, uncle, that that good law was left unmade?
VINCENT: How did it happen, uncle, that that good law was never created?
ANTHONY: How happed it? As it happeth, cousin, that many more be left unmade as well as that one, and almost as good as it too, both here and in other countries—and sometimes some that are worse be made in their stead. But they say that the hindrance of that law was the queen's grace, God forgive her soul! It was the greatest thing, I daresay, that she had to answer for, good lady, when she died. For surely, save for that one thing, she was a full blessed woman.
ANTHONY: How did that happen? As it turns out, cousin, there are many others that remain unmade just like that one, and almost as good too, both here and in other countries—and sometimes, even worse ones are made instead. But they say the reason for that law's failure was the queen's grace, God forgive her soul! It was probably the biggest thing she had to answer for, poor lady, when she died. Because truly, except for that one thing, she was a truly blessed woman.
But letting now that law pass, this temptation in procuring her own death was unto this carpenter's wife no tribulation at all, as far as men could ever perceive. For she liked well to think upon it, and she even longed for it. And therefore if she had before told you or me her intent, and that she would so fain bring it so to pass, we could have had no occasion to comfort her, as one that were in tribulation. But marry, counsel her we might, as I told you before, to refrain and amend that malicious devilish intent.
But now that law is passed, the temptation to bring about her own death was no trouble at all for this carpenter's wife, at least as far as anyone could tell. She actually enjoyed thinking about it and even craved it. So, if she had previously shared her plans with you or me, telling us how much she wanted to make it happen, we wouldn’t have had any reason to comfort her as if she were suffering. However, we might have advised her, as I mentioned earlier, to hold back and change that wicked, devilish intention.
VINCENT: Verily, that is truth. But such as are well willing to do any purpose that is so shameful, they will never tell their intent to nobody, for very shame.
VINCENT: Truly, that's a fact. But those who are eager to pursue a purpose that is so disgraceful will never share their intentions with anyone, out of pure shame.
ANTHONY: Some will not, indeed. And yet are there some again who, be their intent never so shameful, find some yet whom their heart serveth them to make of their counsel therein.
ANTHONY: Some won’t, that’s for sure. And yet there are others who, no matter how shameful their intentions, still find people they can confide in about it.
Some of my folk here can tell you that no longer ago than even yesterday, someone who came out of Vienna told us, among other talking, that a rich widow (but I forgot to ask him where it happened), having all her life a high proud mind and a malicious one—as those two virtues are wont always to keep company together—was at dispute with another neighbour of hers in the town. And on a time she made of her counsel a poor neighbour of hers, whom she thought she might induce, for money, to follow her intent. With him she secretly spoke, and offered him ten ducats for his labour, to do so much for her as in a morning early to come to her house and with an axe unknown privily strike off her head. And when he had done so, he was to convey the bloody axe into the house of him with whom she was at dispute, in such manner as it might be thought that he had murdered her for malice. And then she thought she should be taken for a martyr. And yet had she farther devised that another sum of money should afterward be sent to Rome, and there should be measures made to the Pope that she might in all haste be canonized!
Some people around here can tell you that just yesterday, someone from Vienna told us, among other things, that a wealthy widow (I forgot to ask him where this took place) who had always been proud and spiteful—since those two traits usually go hand in hand—was in a dispute with a neighbor in town. At one point, she recruited a poor neighbor, thinking she could pay him to carry out her plan. She secretly talked to him and offered him ten ducats to come to her house early one morning and kill her with an axe, without anyone knowing. After he did it, he was supposed to take the bloody axe to the house of the person she was arguing with, so it would look like that person had murdered her out of spite. She figured that would make her look like a martyr. She even planned to send more money to Rome afterward and arrange for the Pope to push for her speedy canonization!
This poor man promised, but intended not to perform it. Howbeit, when he deferred it, she provided the axe herself. And he appointed with her the morning when he should come and do it, and thereupon into her house he came. But then set he such other folk as he wished should know of her mad fancy, in such place appointed as they might well hear her and him talk together. And after he had talked with her so much as he thought was enough, he made her lie down, and took up the axe in his own hand. And with the other hand he felt the edge, and found a fault that it was not sharp, and that therefore he would in no wise do it, till he had ground it sharp. He could not otherwise, he said, for pity, it would put her to so much pain. And so, full sore against her will, for that time she kept her head still. But because she would no more suffer any more to deceive her and put her off with delays, ere it was very long thereafter, she hung herself with her own hands.
This poor man promised, but didn’t really plan to go through with it. However, when he kept putting it off, she got the axe herself. They agreed on a morning when he would come and do it, and then he came to her house. But he gathered other people he wanted to know about her crazy idea, putting them in a place where they could easily hear their conversation. After talking to her for a while, enough for his liking, he made her lie down and picked up the axe himself. With one hand, he felt the edge and noticed it wasn’t sharp, so he decided he wouldn’t do it until he sharpened it. He said he couldn’t go through with it out of pity since it would cause her so much pain. So, very reluctantly, she kept her head still for that moment. But because she wouldn’t let anyone deceive her or delay any longer, not long after, she took her own life.
VINCENT: Forsooth, here was a tragical story, whereof I never heard the like.
VINCENT: Truly, this was a tragic story unlike any I've ever heard.
ANTHONY: Forsooth, the party who told it to me swore that he knew it for a truth. And he is, I promise you, such as I reckon for right honest and of substantial truth.
ANTHONY: Honestly, the person who told me this swore that he knew it was true. And I promise you, I consider him to be genuinely honest and trustworthy.
Now, here she forbore not, as shameful an intent as she had, to make someone of her counsel—and yet, I remember, another too, whom she trusted with the money that should procure her canonization. And here I believe that her temptation came not of fear but of high malice and pride. And then was she so glad in that pleasant device that, as I told you, she took it for no tribulation. And therefore comforting of her could have no place. But if men should give her anything toward her help, it must have been, as I told you, good counsel.
Now, she didn't hold back, despite having shameful intentions, when it came to confiding in someone—though I also remember another person she trusted with the money meant for her canonization. I believe her temptation stemmed not from fear but from deep malice and pride. She was so pleased with that clever plan that, as I mentioned, she didn't see it as a source of suffering. So, comforting her wouldn't have made any difference. However, if anyone were to offer her help, as I said before, it should have been good advice.
And therefore, as I said, this kind of temptation to a man's own destruction, which requireth counsel, and is outside tribulation, was outside of our matter, which is to treat of comfort in tribulation.
And so, as I mentioned, this type of temptation that leads to a person's own downfall, which needs advice and is not related to suffering, was not part of our discussion, which is about finding comfort in difficult times.
XVI
But lest you might reject both these examples, thinking they were but feigned tales, I shall put you in remembrance of one which I reckon you yourself have read in the Conferences of Cassian. And if you have not, there you may soon find it. For I myself have half forgotten the thing, it is so long since I read it.
But just in case you might dismiss these examples as just made-up stories, let me remind you of one that I think you’ve read in the Conferences of Cassian. And if you haven’t, you can find it there pretty quickly. I’ve almost forgotten it myself since it’s been so long since I read it.
But thus much I remember: He telleth there of one who was many days a very special holy man in his living, and, among the other virtuous monks and anchorites that lived there in the wilderness, was marvellously much esteemed. Yet some were not all out of fear lest his revelations (of which he told many himself) would prove illusions of the devil. And so it proved afterwards indeed, for the man was by the devil's subtle suggestions brought into such a high spiritual pride that in conclusion the devil brought him to that horrible point that he made him go kill himself.
But here’s what I remember: He talks about a man who lived as a very special holy person for many days, and he was highly regarded among the other virtuous monks and hermits living in the wilderness. However, some had concerns, fearing that his revelations (which he shared a lot) might actually be tricks of the devil. As it turned out, they were right, because the devil's sly suggestions led the man into extreme spiritual pride, ultimately causing him to reach such a terrible point that he ended up taking his own life.
And, as far as my mind giveth me now, without new sight of the book, he brought him to it by this persuasion: He made him believe that it was God's will that he should do so, and that thereby he should go straight to heaven. And if it were by that persuasion, with which he took very great comfort in his own mind himself, then was it, as I said, out of our case, and he needed not comfort but counsel against giving credence to the devil's persuasion. But marry, if he made him first perceive how he had been deluded and then tempted him to his own death by shame and despair, then it was within our matter. For then was his temptation fallen down from pride to pusillanimity, and was waxed that kind of the night's fear that I spoke of. And in such fear a good part of the counsel to be given him should have need to stand in good comforting, for then was he brought into right sore tribulation.
And, as far as I remember right now, without seeing the book again, he convinced him with this reasoning: He made him think that it was God's will for him to do so, and that by doing it, he would go straight to heaven. If this was the reasoning that gave him great comfort, then, as I said, it was outside our situation, and he didn't need comfort but guidance against believing the devil's temptations. But if he first made him realize how he had been misled and then tempted him to his own death through shame and despair, then it was relevant to our situation. Because then his temptation had fallen from pride to fearfulness, and it had become that kind of fear I mentioned earlier. In such fear, a good part of the advice he needed should focus on providing comfort, because he was then in real distress.
But, as I was about to tell you, strength of heart and courage are there none in that deed, not only because true strength (as it hath the name of virtue in a reasonable creature) can never be without prudence, but also because, as I said, even in them that seem men of most courage, it shall well appear to them that well weigh the matter that the mind whereby they be led to destroy themselves groweth of pusillanimity and very foolish fear.
But, as I was about to tell you, there's no strength of heart or courage in that action, not only because true strength (which has the name of virtue in a rational being) can never exist without wisdom, but also because, as I mentioned, even in those who seem the bravest, it will become clear to those who truly consider the situation that the mindset leading them to harm themselves comes from weakness and very foolish fear.
Take for example Cato of Utica, who in Africa killed himself after the great victory that Julius Caesar had. St. Austine well declareth in his work De civitate Dei that there was no strength nor magnanimity in his destruction of himself, but plain pusillanimity and impotency of stomach. For he was forced to do it because his heart was too feeble to bear the beholding of another man's glory or the suffering of other worldly calamities that he feared should fall on himself. So that, as St. Austine well proveth, that horrible deed is no act of strength, but an act of a mind either drawn from the consideration of itself with some fiendish fancy, in which the man hath need to be called home with good counsel; or else oppressed by faint heart and fear, in which a good part of the counsel must stand in lifting up his courage with good consolation and comfort.
Take Cato of Utica, for example, who took his own life in Africa after Julius Caesar's great victory. St. Augustine clearly states in his work De civitate Dei that there was no strength or nobility in his suicide, only pure weakness and a lack of will. He was driven to it because his heart was too weak to handle witnessing another person's glory or the possibility of facing worldly hardships he feared would come upon him. Thus, as St. Augustine effectively demonstrates, that terrible deed is not an act of strength, but rather an act of a mind either distracted by some dark fantasy and in need of wise counsel to return to reason; or alternatively, overwhelmed by cowardice and fear, where a significant part of that counsel should focus on boosting his courage with encouragement and solace.
And therefore if we found any such religious person as was that father whom Cassian writeth of, who were of such austerity and apparent ghostly living as he was, and reputed by those who well knew him for a man of singular virtue; and if it were perceived that he had many strange visions appearing unto him; and if after that it should now be perceived that the man went about secretly to destroy himself—whosoever should hap to come to the knowledge of it and intended to do his best to hinder it, he must first find the means to search and find out the manner and countenance of the man. He must see whether he be lightsome, glad, and joyful or dumpish, heavy, and sad, and whether he go about it as one that were full of the glad hope of heaven, or as one who had his breast stuffed full of tediousness and weariness of the world. If he were found to be of the first fashion, it would be a token that the devil had, by his fantastical apparitions, puffed him up in such a childish pride that he hath finally persuaded him, by some illusion showed him for the proof, that God's pleasure is that he shall for his sake with his own hands kill himself.
And so, if we found someone as religious as that father Cassian wrote about, known for his strict lifestyle and respected as a person of remarkable virtue, and if it became clear that he experienced many strange visions, and then it was noticed that he was secretly trying to harm himself—anyone who learned of this and wanted to help stop it would first need to figure out what kind of person he was. They would have to see if he seemed light, happy, and joyful, or gloomy, heavy, and sad, and whether he approached the situation with a hopeful attitude towards heaven, or if he felt weighed down by tedium and weariness with the world. If he appeared to be the former, it would indicate that the devil, through his fantastical visions, had inflated his childish pride to the point where he was convinced, due to some illusion meant to prove it, that God’s will was for him to take his own life.
VINCENT: Now, if a man so found it, uncle, what counsel should he give him then?
VINCENT: So, if a guy discovered that, uncle, what advice should he give him then?
ANTHONY: That would be somewhat out of our purpose, cousin, since (as I told you before) the man would not be in sorrow and tribulation, of which our matter speaketh, but in a perilous merry mortal temptation. So that if we should, beside our matter that we have in hand, enter into that too, we might make a longer work between both than we could well finish this day. Howbeit, to be short, it is soon seen that in such a case the sum and effect of the counsel must (in a manner) rest in giving him warning of the devil's sleights. And that must be done under such a sweet pleasant manner that the man should not abhor to hear it. For while it could not lightly be otherwise that the man were rocked and sung asleep by the devil's craft, and his mind occupied as it were in a delectable dream, he should never have good audience of him who would rudely and boisterously shog him and wake him, and so shake him out of it. Therefore must you fair and easily touch him, and with some pleasant speech awake him, so that he wax not wayward, as children do who are waked ere they wish to rise.
ANTHONY: That would be a bit off our topic, cousin, since (as I mentioned before) the man wouldn't be in sorrow and trouble, which is what we're discussing, but in a dangerously cheerful temptation. So if we were to tackle that issue along with our current topic, it would take much longer than we could finish today. However, to be brief, it’s clear that in such a situation, the main goal of our advice should focus on warning him about the devil's tricks. And that has to be done in such a pleasant way that he wouldn't mind hearing it. Because it’s likely that he’s been lulled into a nice dream by the devil's schemes, he wouldn’t respond well to someone who roughly shakes him awake. Therefore, you need to gently nudge him and use some lighthearted words to wake him up, so he doesn't become cranky like children do when they're woken up before they want to get out of bed.
But when a man hath first begun with his praise (for if he be proud you shall much better please him with a commendation than with a dirge) then, after favour won therewith, a man may little by little insinuate the doubt of such revelations—not at first as though it were for any doubt of his, but of some other man's, that men in some other places talk of. And peradventure it shall not miscontent him to say that great perils may fall therein, in another man's case than his own, and he shall begin to preach upon it. Or, if you were a man that had not so very great scrupulous conscience of a harmless lie devised to do good with (the kind which St. Austine, though he take it always for sin, yet he taketh but for venial; and St. Jerome, as by divers places in his books appeareth, taketh not fully for that much), then may you feign some secret friend of yours to be in such a state. And you may say that you yourself somewhat fear his peril, and have made of charity this voyage for his sake, to ask this good father's counsel.
But when a man first starts receiving praise (because if he's proud, you'll please him much more with compliments than with a lament), once you've won his favor, you can gradually introduce doubts about such revelations—not right away, as if it were your doubt, but as if it's about someone else that people in other places are talking about. And perhaps he won't mind if you mention that there can be great dangers in someone else's situation, not his own, and you'll start to preach about it. Or, if you're someone who doesn’t have a strictly scrupulous conscience about a harmless lie meant to do good (the kind that St. Augustine considers a sin but only a minor one; and St. Jerome, as shown in various parts of his writings, doesn’t fully agree), then you might invent a secret friend of yours who is in such a state. You can say that you are a bit worried about his danger and that you've made this journey out of compassion to seek this good father’s advice.
And in the communication, upon these words of St. John, "Give not credence to every spirit, but prove the spirits whether they be of God," and these words of St. Paul, "The angel of Satan transfigureth himself into the angel of light," you shall take occasion (the better if they hap to come in on his side), but yet not lack occasion neither if those texts, for lack of his offer, come in upon your own—occasion, I say, you shall not lack to enquire by what sure and undeceivable tokens a man may discern the true revelations from the false illusions. A man shall find many such tokens both here and there in divers other authors and all together in divers goodly treatises of that good godly doctor, Master John Gerson, entitled De probatione spirituum. As, whether the party be natural in manner or seem anything fantastical. Or, whether the party be poor-spirited or proud. The pride will somewhat appear by his delight in his own praise; or if, of wiliness, or of another pride for to be praised of humility, he refused to hear of that, yet any little fault found in himself, or diffidence declared and mistrust of his own revelations and doubtful tokens told, wherefore he himself should fear lest they be the devil's illusion—such things, as Master Gerson saith, will make him spit out somewhat of his spirit, if the devil lie in his breast. Or if the devil be yet so subtle that he keep himself close in his warm den and blow out never a hot word, yet it is to be considered what end his revelations tend to—whether to any spiritual profit to himself or other folk, or only to vain marvels and wonders. Also, whether they withdraw him from such other good virtuous business as, by the common rule of Christendom or any of the rules of his profession, he was wont to use or bound to be occupied in. Or whether he fall into any singularity of opinions against the scripture of God, or against the common faith of Christ's Catholic Church. Many other tokens are spoken of in the work of Master Gerson, by which to consider whether the person, neither having revelations of God nor illusions from the devil, do feign his revelations himself, either for winning of money or worldly favour, and delude the people withal.
And in the discussion, based on the words of St. John, "Don't believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see if they are from God," and these words of St. Paul, "Satan's angel transforms himself into an angel of light," you should take the opportunity (it's even better if those words come from his side), but you shouldn't lack the opportunity either if those texts, by chance, come up on your own—opportunity, I mean, you will have to inquire about what clear and undeniable signs a person can use to tell the true revelations from false illusions. You will find many such signs scattered in various other authors and all together in several good treatises by that good doctor, Master John Gerson, titled De probatione spirituum. For example, whether the person is natural in manner or seems somewhat fantastical. Or whether the person is timid or arrogant. Pride may show through his enjoyment of his own praise; or if, out of cunning, or out of a different pride to be praised for humility, he refuses to hear about that, any small fault he finds in himself, or his expressed doubts and mistrust of his own revelations and dubious signs might make him worry that they could be the devil's illusion—such things, as Master Gerson says, will make him reveal something of his spirit, if the devil is hiding within him. Or if the devil is so clever that he stays hunkered down in his warm den and doesn’t let out a single hot word, it’s still important to consider what purpose his revelations serve—whether they lead to any spiritual benefit for himself or others, or just to empty marvels and wonders. Also, whether they distract him from other good and virtuous activities that, according to the general rules of Christendom or any rules of his profession, he was used to or bound to engage in. Or whether he falls into any uniqueness of opinions that contradict the scripture of God or the common faith of Christ's Catholic Church. Many other signs are discussed in Master Gerson's work, to help assess whether the person truly has revelations from God or illusions from the devil, or if they are faking their revelations for the sake of making money or gaining worldly favor, thereby deceiving people.
But now for our purpose: If, among any of the marks by which the true revelations may be known from false illusions, that man himself bring forth, for one mark, the doing or teaching of anything against the scripture of God or the common faith of the church, you may enter into the special matter, in which he can never well flee from you. Or else may you yet, if you wish, feign that your secret friend, for whose sake you come to him for counsel, is brought to that mind by a certain apparition showed unto him, as he himself saith, by an angel—as you fear, by the devil. And that he cannot as yet be otherwise persuaded by you but that the pleasure of God is that he shall go kill himself. And that he believeth if he do so he shall then be thereby so specially participant of Christ's passion that he shall forthwith be carried up with angels into heaven. And that he is so joyful for this that he firmly purposeth upon it, no less glad to do it than another man would be glad to avoid it. And therefore may you desire his good counsel to instruct you with some substantial good advice, with which you may turn him from this error, that he be not, under hope of God's true revelation, destroyed in body and soul by the devil's false illusion.
But now, for our purpose: If, among the signs that distinguish true revelations from false illusions, any man brings up the idea of doing or teaching anything that goes against God's scripture or the common beliefs of the church, you can dive into that specific issue, from which he can never really escape. Alternatively, if you want, you can pretend that your secret friend, for whom you're seeking his advice, is being led to this decision by some vision he claims to have seen from an angel—as you suspect, possibly from the devil. And that he cannot be convinced otherwise by you except in believing that God's will is for him to end his own life. He believes that if he does this, he will become a special participant in Christ's suffering and will immediately be taken up to heaven by angels. He is so happy about this that he is determined to follow through, just as another person would be happy to avoid it. Therefore, you might ask for his wise counsel to give you some solid advice to help turn your friend away from this mistake, so he isn't led to destruction in body and soul by the devil's false illusions while hoping for God's true revelation.
If he will in this thing study and labour to instruct you, the things that he himself shall find, of his own invention, though they be less effectual, shall peradventure more work with him toward his own amendment (since he shall, of likelihood, better like them) than shall things double so substantial that were told him by another man. If he be loth to think upon that side, and therefore shrink from the matter, then is there no other way but to venture to fall into the matter after the plain fashion, and tell what you hear, and give him counsel and exhortation to the contrary. Unless you wish to say that thus and thus hath the matter been reasoned already between your friend and you. And therein may you rehearse such things as should prove that the vision which moveth him is no true revelation, but a very false illusion.
If he is willing to study and work hard to teach you, the things he discovers on his own, even if they are not as effective, might actually resonate more with him and help him improve (since he will probably appreciate them more) than things that are twice as substantial but were explained to him by someone else. If he is reluctant to consider that perspective and pulls away from the issue, then the only option left is to tackle the matter directly, share what you've heard, and offer him advice and encouragement to think differently. Unless you want to mention that this issue has already been discussed between you and your friend. In that case, you can point out things that would show that the insight he is pursuing isn’t a genuine revelation but rather a false illusion.
VINCENT: Verily, uncle, I well allow that a man should, in this thing as well as in every other in which he longeth to do another man good, seek such a pleasant way that the party should be likely to like his communication, or at least to take it well in worth. And he should not enter in unto it in such a way that he whom he would help should abhor him and be loth to hear him, and therefore take no profit by him.
VINCENT: Truly, uncle, I agree that a person should, in this matter as well as in anything else where he wants to do good for someone, look for a kind approach that makes the other person likely to appreciate his message, or at least see its value. He shouldn't approach it in a way that makes the person he wants to help dislike him and unwilling to listen, as that would prevent any benefit from being gained.
But now, uncle, if it come, by the one way or the other, to the point where he will or shall hear me; what be the effectual means with which I should by my counsel convert him?
But now, uncle, if it comes to the point where he will hear me one way or another, what effective means should I use in my advice to convince him?
ANTHONY: All those by which you may make him perceive that he is deceived, and that his visions are no godly revelations but very devilish illusion. And those reasons must you gather of the man, of the matter, and of the law of God, or of some one of these.
ANTHONY: All the ways you can show him that he is being deceived, and that his visions are not divine revelations but rather wicked illusions. You need to gather those reasons from the man, the matter, and the law of God, or any one of these.
Of the man may you gather them, if you can peradventure show him that in such-and-such a point he is waxed worse since such revelations have haunted him than he was before—as, in those who are deluded, whosoever be well acquainted with them shall well mark and perceive. For they wax more proud, more wayward, more envious, suspicious, misjudging and depraving other men, with the delight of their own praise, and such other spiritual vices of the soul.
Of the man, you may gather them, if you can perhaps show him that in this or that way he has gotten worse since those revelations have troubled him, compared to how he was before—as is seen in those who are misled; anyone who knows them well will notice this. They become more proud, more stubborn, more envious, suspicious, misjudging, and corrupting towards others, while taking pleasure in their own praise, along with other spiritual flaws of the soul.
Of the matter may you gather, if it has happened that his revelations before have proved false, or if they be strange things rather than profitable ones. For that is a good mark between God's miracles and the devil's wonders. For Christ and his saints have their miracles always tending to fruit and profit. The devil and his witches and necromancers, all their wonderful works tend to no fruitful end, but to a fruitless ostentation and show, as it were a juggler who would for a show before the people play feats of skill at a feast.
You can tell the difference if his revelations have turned out to be false before, or if they are just strange rather than useful. That’s a clear sign between God’s miracles and the devil’s tricks. Christ and his saints always perform miracles that are beneficial and fruitful. In contrast, the devil and his witches and necromancers create wonders that serve no useful purpose but to show off, like a juggler putting on a performance for an audience at a feast.
Of the law of God you must draw your reasons in showing by the scripture that the thing which he thinketh God biddeth by his angel, God hath by his own mouth forbidden. And that is, you know well, in the case that we speak of, so easy to find that I need not to rehearse it to you. For among the Ten Commandments there is plainly forbidden the unlawful killing of any man, and therefore of himself, as (St. Austine saith) all the church teacheth, unless he himself be no man.
You need to base your arguments on the law of God by showing through scripture that what he thinks God commands through his angel is actually something God has explicitly forbidden himself. This is very easy to find in the situation we're discussing, so I won’t go into detail. Among the Ten Commandments, it clearly states that unlawfully killing anyone is forbidden, which also applies to taking one’s own life, as St. Augustine says, and this is what the entire church teaches—unless he considers himself to be no one.
VINCENT: This is very true, good uncle, nor will I dispute upon any glossing of that prohibition. But since we find not the contrary but that God may dispense with that commandment himself, and both license and command also, if he himself wish, any man to go kill either another man or himself, this man who is now by such a marvellous vision induced to believe that God so biddeth him, and therefore thinketh himself in that case discharged of that prohibition and charged with the contrary commandment—with what reason can we make him perceive that his vision is but an illusion and not a true revelation?
VINCENT: This is very true, good uncle, and I won’t argue about the interpretation of that prohibition. But since we see that God can override that commandment himself, both allowing and commanding anyone to go and kill either another person or themselves, this man who is now convinced by such an amazing vision that God is telling him to do so believes he is released from that prohibition and tasked with the opposite commandment. How can we make him understand that his vision is just an illusion and not a genuine revelation?
ANTHONY: Nay, Cousin Vincent, you shall in this case not need to ask those reasons of me. But taking the scripture of God for a ground for this matter, you know very well yourself that you shall go somewhat a shorter way to work if you ask this question of him: Since God hath forbidden once the thing himself, though he may dispense with it if he will, yet since the devil may feign himself God and with a marvellous vision delude one, and make as though God did it; and since the devil is also more likely to speak against God's commandment than God against his own; you shall have good cause, I say, to demand of the man himself whereby he knoweth that his vision is God's true revelation and not the devil's false delusion.
ANTHONY: No, Cousin Vincent, you don’t need to ask me for those reasons in this case. But if we take the scripture of God as a basis for this issue, you know very well that you’ll get to the point more quickly if you ask him this question: Since God has forbidden this thing himself, even though He can allow it if He chooses, the devil can still pretend to be God and deceive someone with an incredible vision, making it seem like God did it; and since the devil is also more likely to go against God's commandments than God is to go against His own; you have every reason, I say, to ask the man himself how he knows his vision is truly from God and not a false deception from the devil.
VINCENT: Indeed, uncle, I think that would be a hard question to him. Can a man, uncle, have in such a thing even a very sure knowledge of his own mind?
VINCENT: Yeah, uncle, I think that would be a tough question for him. Can a person, uncle, really have a clear understanding of their own thoughts about something like this?
ANTHONY: Yea, cousin, God may cast into the mind of a man, I suppose, such an inward light of understanding that he cannot fail but be sure thereof. And yet he who is deluded by the devil may think himself as sure and yet be deceived indeed. And such a difference is there in a manner between them, as between the sight of a thing while we are awake and look thereon, and the sight with which we see a thing in our sleep while we dream thereof.
ANTHONY: Yeah, cousin, I believe that God can inspire a person with such a deep understanding that they can't help but be certain of it. Yet a person who is misled by the devil might feel just as sure but is actually being deceived. There's a significant difference between these two, much like the difference between seeing something clearly while we're awake and seeing something in our dreams while we're asleep.
VINCENT: This is a pretty similitude, uncle, in this thing! And then is it easy for the monk that we speak of to declare that he knoweth his vision for a true revelation and not a false delusion, if there be so great a difference between them.
VINCENT: This is a pretty similar situation, uncle, in this matter! And it's easy for the monk we're talking about to say that he knows his vision is a true revelation and not a false delusion, if there's such a big difference between them.
ANTHONY: Not so easy yet, cousin, as you think it would be. For how can you prove to me that you are awake?
ANTHONY: It's not as easy as you think, cousin. How can you prove to me that you're actually awake?
VINCENT: Marry, lo, do I not now wag my hand, shake my head, and stamp with my foot here on the floor?
VINCENT: Seriously, look, am I not now waving my hand, shaking my head, and stomping my foot here on the floor?
ANTHONY: Have you never dreamed ere this that you have done the same?
ANTHONY: Have you never dreamed before that you did the same thing?
VINCENT: Yes, that have I, and more too than that. For I have ere this in my sleep dreamed that I doubted whether I were asleep or awake, and have in good faith thought that I did thereupon even the same things that I do now indeed, and thereby determined that I was not asleep. And yet have I dreamed in good faith further, that I have been afterward at dinner and there, making merry with good company, have told the same dream at the table and laughed well at it, to think that while I was asleep I had by such means of moving the parts of my body and considering thereof, so verily thought myself awake!
VINCENT: Yes, I have, and even more than that. I've actually dreamed that I couldn't tell if I was asleep or awake, and I honestly thought I was doing the same things I do now. That made me believe I was awake. I've also dreamed that later, at dinner with great company, I shared that dream at the table and we all had a good laugh about it, thinking about how while I was asleep, I had been moving my body and thinking about it so much that I truly believed I was awake!
ANTHONY: And will you not now soon, think you, when you wake and rise, laugh as well at yourself when you see that you lie now in your warm bed asleep again, and dream all this time, while you believe so verily that you are awake and talking of these matters with me?
ANTHONY: And won’t you soon, when you wake up and get out of bed, also laugh at yourself when you realize you’re lying in your warm bed fast asleep again, dreaming this whole time, while you truly believe you’re awake and talking about all this with me?
VINCENT: God's Lord, uncle, you go now merrily to work with me indeed, when you look and speak so seriously and would make me think I were asleep!
VINCENT: God’s Lord, uncle, you're going to work with me cheerfully now, but when you look and talk so seriously, it makes me feel like I’m dreaming!
ANTHONY: It may be that you are, for anything that you can say or do whereby you can, with any reason that you make, drive me to confess that you yourself be sure of the contrary. For you cannot do or say anything now whereby you are sure to be awake but what you have ere this, or hereafter may, think yourself as surely to do the selfsame thing indeed while you be all the while asleep and do nothing but lie dreaming.
ANTHONY: It might be possible that you are, because of anything you say or do that makes me, with any reasoning you provide, admit that you’re definitely certain of the opposite. You can’t do or say anything now that guarantees you’re awake, because you’ve probably thought before, or will think in the future, that you were definitely doing exactly the same thing while you were actually asleep and just lying there dreaming.
VINCENT: Well, well, uncle, though I have ere this thought myself awake while I was indeed asleep, yet for all this I know well enough that I am awake now. And so do you too, though I cannot find the words by which I may with reason force you to confess it, without your always driving me off by the example of my dream.
VINCENT: Well, well, uncle, even though I've thought I was awake before when I was actually asleep, I know for sure that I'm awake now. And so do you, even though I can't find the words to make you admit it, since you always push me away with the example of my dream.
ANTHONY: Meseemeth, cousin, this is very true. And likewise meseemeth the manner and difference between some kind of true revelations and some kind of false illusions is like that which standeth between the things that are done awake and the things that in our dreams seem to be done when we are sleeping. That is, he who hath that kind of revelation from God is as sure of the truth as we are of our own deeds while we are awake. And he who is deluded by the devil is in such wise deceived as they are by their dream, and worse, too. And yet he reckoneth himself for the time as sure as the other, saving that one believeth falsely, the other truly knoweth. But I say not, cousin, that this kind of sure knowledge cometh in every kind of revelation. For there are many kinds, of which it would be too long to talk now. But I say that God doth certainly send some such to a man in some thing, or may.
ANTHONY: It seems to me, cousin, that this is very true. Also, I think the difference between some true revelations and some false illusions is like the difference between what we experience when we're awake and what we think happens in our dreams while we sleep. In other words, someone who has that kind of revelation from God knows the truth just as we know our own actions when we're awake. Meanwhile, someone who is deceived by the devil is misled just like they are in their dreams, and even worse. Yet, at that moment, they think they're as certain as the other person, except that one believes falsely while the other truly knows. But I’m not saying, cousin, that this kind of certain knowledge comes with every type of revelation. There are many kinds of revelations, which would take too long to discuss now. But I do say that God definitely gives some people such knowledge in certain matters, or He can.
VINCENT: Yet then this religious man of whom we speak, when I show him the scripture against his revelation and therefore call it an illusion, may bid me with reason go mind my own affairs. For he knoweth well and surely himself that his revelation is very good and true and not any false illusion, since for all the general commandment of God in the scripture, God may dispense where he will and when he will, and may command him to do the contrary. For he commanded Abraham to kill his own son, and Sampson had, by inspiration of God, commandment to kill himself by pulling down the house upon his own head at the feast of the Philistines.
VINCENT: But then this religious man we’re talking about, when I show him the scripture that contradicts his revelation and call it an illusion, can reasonably tell me to mind my own business. Because he knows very well that his revelation is genuine and true, not some false illusion. After all, despite the general commandment of God in scripture, God can grant exceptions whenever and however he wants, and can tell him to do the opposite. For instance, God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his own son, and Samson was inspired by God to end his life by collapsing the building on himself during the feast of the Philistines.
Now, if I would then do as you bade me right now, tell him that such apparitions may be illusions, and since God's word is in the scripture against him plain for the prohibition, he must perceive the truth of his revelation whereby I may know it is not a false illusion; then shall he in turn bid me tell him whereby I can prove myself to be awake and talk with him and not be asleep and dream so, since in my dream I may as surely think so as I know that I do so. And thus shall he drive me to the same bay to which I would bring him.
Now, if I were to do what you asked me right now, I'd tell him that such visions might be just illusions. Since God's word in the scripture clearly prohibits this, he needs to understand the truth of his revelation so I can know it's not a false illusion. Then he will ask me how I can prove I'm awake and actually talking to him instead of just dreaming, since in my dream, I could just as easily believe that I am as I know that I am. And in this way, he would corner me just as I’m trying to corner him.
ANTHONY: This is well said, cousin, but yet could he not escape you so. For the dispensation of God's common precept, which dispensation he must say that he hath by his private revelation, is a thing of such sort as showeth itself naught and false. For it never hath any example like, since the world began until now, that ever man hath read or heard of, among faithful people commended.
ANTHONY: This is well put, cousin, but he can't just get away from you that easily. The way he's claiming to have a personal revelation from God that overrides everyone's common beliefs is just wrong and deceitful. There’s never been an example like this, from the beginning of time until now, that anyone has read or heard of among faithful people praised.
First, as for Abraham, concerning the death of his son: God intended it not, but only tempted the towardness of the father's obedience. As for Sampson, all men make not the matter very sure whether he be saved or not, but yet therein some matter and cause appeareth. For the Philistines being enemies of God and using Sampson for their mocking-stock in scorn of God, it is well likely that God gave him the mind to bestow his own life upon the revenging of the displeasure that those blasphemous Philistines did unto God. And that appeareth clear enough by this: that though his strength failed him when he lacked his hair, yet had he not, it seemeth, that strength evermore at hand while he had his hair, but only at such times as it pleased God to give it to him. This thing appeareth by these words, that the scripture in some place of that matter saith, "The power or might of God rushed into Sampson." And so therefore, since this thing that he did in the pulling down of the house was done by the special gift of strength then at that point given him by God, it well declareth that the strength of God, and with it the spirit of God, entered into him for it.
First, regarding Abraham and the death of his son: God did not intend it, but only tested the father's willingness to obey. As for Samson, people can't really agree on whether he was saved or not, but there are reasons to consider. The Philistines, being enemies of God and using Samson as a source of mockery against Him, likely influenced God to inspire Samson to sacrifice his own life to take revenge for the offense those blasphemous Philistines caused to God. This is evident because, although his strength failed him when he lost his hair, it seems he didn't always have that strength even when he did have his hair, but only when it pleased God to give it to him. This is shown in the scripture where it says, "The power of God rushed into Samson." Therefore, since the act of bringing down the house was accomplished through the special gift of strength given to him by God at that moment, it clearly demonstrates that the strength of God, along with His spirit, entered into him for that purpose.
St. Austine also rehearseth that certain holy virtuous virgins, in time of persecution, being pursued by God's enemies the infidels to be deflowered by force, ran into a water and drowned themselves rather than be bereaved of their virginity. And, albeit that he thinketh it is not lawful for any other maid to follow their example, but that she should suffer another to do her any manner of violence by force and commit sin of his own upon her against her will, rather than willingly and thereby sinfully herself to become a homicide of herself; yet he thinketh that in them it happened by the special instinct of the spirit of God, who, for causes seen to himself, would rather that they should avoid it with their own temporal death than abide the defiling and violation of their chastity.
St. Augustine also recounts that certain holy, virtuous virgins, during a time of persecution, were chased by God’s enemies, the infidels, who intended to force them into losing their virginity. They chose to jump into the water and drown themselves rather than be stripped of their purity. Although he believes it’s not lawful for any other girl to follow their example, suggesting that she should endure any violence done to her and let someone else sin against her will, rather than willingly becoming a murderer of herself, he thinks that in these cases, it was due to a special prompting from the spirit of God. For reasons known only to Him, God would prefer that they chose to avoid such defilement through their own death instead of suffering the violation of their chastity.
But now this good man neither hath any of God's enemies to be revenged on by his own death, nor any woman who violently pursues him to bereave him by force of his virginity! And we never find that God proved any man's obedient mind by the commandment of his own slaughter of himself. Therefore is both his case plainly against God's open precept, and the dispensation strange and without example, no cause appearing nor well imaginable. Unless he would think that God could neither any longer live without him, nor could take him to him in such wise as he doth other men, but must command him to come by a forbidden way, by which, without other cause, we never heard that ever he bade any man else before.
But now this good man has no enemies of God to take revenge on with his own death, nor is there any woman who aggressively pursues him to take away his virginity by force! And we never see that God tested any man's obedience by commanding him to kill himself. So, his situation is clearly against God's clear command, and the arrangement is strange and unprecedented, with no obvious reason or even one that's easy to imagine. Unless he thinks that God could no longer live without him, or that God couldn't take him in the same way He does with other people, and had to command him to come in a forbidden way, which we've never heard of God telling anyone else to do before.
Now, you think that, if you should after this bid him tell you by what way he knoweth that his intent riseth upon a true revelation and not upon a false illusion, he in turn would bid you tell him by what means you know that you are talking with him well awake and not dreaming it asleep. You may answer him that for men thus to talk together as you do and to prove and perceive that they do so, by the moving of themselves, with putting the question unto themselves for their pleasure, and marking and considering it, is in waking a daily common thing that every man doth or can do when he will, and when they do it, they do it but for pleasure. But in sleep it happeneth very seldom that men dream that they do so, and in the dream they never put the question except for doubt. And you may tell him that, since this revelation is such also as happeneth so seldom and oftener happeneth that men dream of such than have such indeed, therefore it is more reasonable that he show you how he knoweth, in such a rare thing and a thing more like a dream, that he himself is not asleep, than that you, in such a common thing among folk that are awake and so seldom happening in a dream, should need to show him whereby you know that you be not asleep.
Now, you might think that if you asked him how he knows his intentions come from a true revelation and not from a false illusion, he would then ask you how you know that you are talking to him while fully awake and not dreaming. You could tell him that it's common for people to have conversations like this when they are awake, to engage and realize they are doing so by moving themselves, asking questions for their own enjoyment, and reflecting on it, which anyone can do whenever they want. When they do this, it’s just for fun. However, in sleep, it’s very rare for people to dream that they are having such conversations, and when they do, it’s usually because of doubt. You might point out that since such revelations happen so infrequently and it’s more common for people to dream about them than to experience them in reality, it makes more sense for him to explain how he knows he’s not asleep in such a rare instance that resembles a dream, rather than for you to explain how you know you’re not asleep in a situation that is so typical among awake people and so rarely occurs in dreams.
Besides this, he to whom you should show it seeth himself and perceiveth the thing that he would bid you prove. But the thing that he would make you believe—the truth of his revelation which you bid him prove—you see not that he knoweth it well himself. And therefore, ere you believe it against the scripture, it would be well consonant unto reason that he should show you how he knoweth it for a true waking revelation and not a false dreaming delusion.
Besides this, the person you’re supposed to show it to sees himself and understands the thing he’s asking you to prove. But the truth he wants you to believe—the reality of his revelation that you’re asking him to confirm—you don’t see that he knows it well himself. So, before you believe it against scripture, it would make sense for him to show you how he knows it to be a genuine revelation and not a false delusion from a dream.
VINCENT: Then shall he peradventure answer me that whether I believe him or not maketh to him no matter; the thing toucheth himself and not me, and he himself is in himself as sure that it is a true revelation as that he can tell that he dreameth not but talketh with me awake.
VINCENT: Then he might answer me that whether I believe him or not doesn’t matter to him; this issue concerns him alone, and he is as sure of this true revelation as he is that he isn’t dreaming but is actually talking to me while awake.
ANTHONY: Without doubt, cousin, if he abide at that point and can by no reason be brought to do so much as doubt, nor can by no means be shogged out of his dead sleep, but will needs take his dream for a very truth, and—as some men rise by night and walk about their chamber in their sleep—will so rise and hang himself; I can then see no other way but either bind him fast in his bed, or else essay whether that might hap to help him with which, the common tale goeth, a carver's wife helped her husband in such a frantic fancy. When, upon a Good Friday, he would needs have killed himself for Christ as Christ did for him, she said to him that it would then be fitting for him to die even after the same fashion. And that might not be by his own hands, but by the hand of another; for Christ, perdy, killed not himself. And because her husband would take no counsel (for that would he not, in no wise), she offered him that for God's sake she would secretly crucify him herself upon a great cross that he had made to nail a new-carved crucifix upon. And he was very glad thereof. Yet then she bethought her that Christ was bound to a pillar and beaten first, and afterward crowned with thorns. Thereupon, when she had by his own assent bound him fast to a post, she left not off beating, with holy exhortation to suffer, so much and so long that ere ever she left work and unbound him (praying nevertheless, that she might put on his head, and drive well down, a crown of thorns that she had wrought for him and brought him), he said he thought this was enough for that year. He would pray God to forbear him of the rest till Good Friday came again! But when it came again the next years, then was his desire past; he longed to follow Christ no further.
ANTHONY: Without a doubt, cousin, if he stays at that point and can't be made to doubt his beliefs, nor can he be shaken out of his deep sleep, but insists on taking his dream as absolute truth, and—just like some people get up at night and roam around their rooms in their sleep—will get up and hang himself; I see no other option than to either tie him tightly in his bed, or try what, as the common story goes, a carver's wife did to help her husband in a similar madness. On a Good Friday, when he insisted he had to kill himself for Christ, just as Christ did for him, she told him it would be fitting for him to die in the same way. But it shouldn't be by his own hands, rather by someone else's; after all, Christ didn't kill himself. And since her husband wouldn’t listen to any advice (he was absolutely against that), she offered him that, for God's sake, she would secretly crucify him herself on a large cross he had built to attach a newly carved crucifix. He was very pleased with that. However, she then remembered that Christ was first tied to a pillar and beaten, and afterward crowned with thorns. So, when she had, with his consent, tied him to a post, she didn't stop beating him, with a holy encouragement to endure, for so long that by the time she finished and untied him (all the while praying that she could place a crown of thorns she had made for him on his head and push it down properly), he said he thought this was enough for this year. He would pray to God to spare him from any more until Good Friday came around again! But when it came again the next year, his desire had passed; he no longer wanted to follow Christ.
VINCENT: Indeed, uncle, if this help him not, then will nothing help him, I suppose.
VINCENT: Yeah, uncle, if this doesn't help him, then I guess nothing will.
ANTHONY: And yet, cousin, the devil may peradventure make him, toward such a purpose, first gladly suffer other pain; yea, and diminish his feeling in it, too, that he may thereby the less fear his death. And yet are peradventure sometimes such things and many more to be essayed. For as the devil may hap to make him suffer, so may he hap to miss, namely if his friends fall to prayer for him against his temptation. For that can he himself never do, while he taketh it for none.
ANTHONY: And yet, cousin, the devil might make him willingly endure some pain for a purpose, and even dull his sensitivity to it, so he fears his death less. And there may be times when such things and many more should be tried. Just as the devil can make him suffer, he might also fail—especially if his friends pray for him against his temptation. Because he can never do that himself if he doesn't see it as a real threat.
But, for conclusion: If the man be surely proved so inflexibly set upon the purpose to destroy himself, as being commanded by God to do so, that no good counsel that men can give him nor any other thing that men may do to him can refrain him, but that he would surely shortly kill himself; then except only good prayer made by his friends for him, I can find no further shift but either to have him ever in sight or to bind him fast in his bed.
But, in conclusion: If a man is clearly determined to kill himself, believing it's God's will, to the point where no good advice or actions from others can stop him, and he will definitely go through with it soon, then aside from the good prayers offered by his friends, I see no other option but to keep him under constant watch or to restrain him in his bed.
And so must he needs of reason be content to be ordered. For though he himself may take his fancy for a true revelation, yet since he cannot make us perceive it for such, likewise as he thinketh himself by his secret commandment bound to follow it, so must he needs agree that, since it is against the plain open prohibition of God, we are bound by the plain open precept to keep him from it.
And so he must accept being guided by reason. For even if he believes his idea is a true revelation, since he can't make us see it that way, just as he feels compelled by his hidden conviction to follow it, he has to agree that, because it clearly goes against God's open prohibition, we are obligated by the clear commandment to prevent him from it.
VINCENT: In this point, uncle, I can go no further. But now, if he were, on the other hand, perceived to intend his destruction and go about it with heaviness of heart and thought and dullness—what way would there be to be used to him then?
VINCENT: At this point, uncle, I can’t continue. But now, if he were, on the other hand, seen as wanting to hurt himself and doing it with a heavy heart, dark thoughts, and a lack of energy—how should we deal with him then?
ANTHONY: Then would his temptation, as I told you before, be properly pertaining to our matter, for then would he be in a sore tribulation and a very perilous. For then would it be a token that the devil had either, by bringing him into some great sin, brought him into despair, or peradventure, by his revelations being found false and reproved or by some secret sin of his being deprehended and divulged, had cast him both into despair of heaven through fear and into a weariness of this life for shame. For then he seeth his estimation lost among other folk of whose praise he was wont to be proud.
ANTHONY: So his temptation, as I mentioned before, would be relevant to our discussion, because it means he would be in serious trouble and in great danger. This would indicate that the devil had either led him into a significant sin, causing him to lose hope, or perhaps, after his false revelations were exposed and criticized, or because some hidden sin of his was uncovered and spread, he had plunged into despair about heaven out of fear and become weary of life out of shame. Because then he sees his reputation ruined among others whose praise he used to take pride in.
And therefore, cousin, in such a case as this, the man is to be fairly handled and sweetly, and with tender loving words to be put in good courage, and comforted in all that men goodly can. Here must they put him in mind that, if he despair not, but pull up his courage and trust in God's great mercy, he shall have in conclusion great cause to be glad of this fall. For before he stood in greater peril than he was aware of, while he took himself for better than he was. And God, for favour that he beareth him, hath suffered him to fall deep into the devil's danger, to make him thereby know what he was while he took himself for so sure. And therefore, as he suffered him then to fall for a remedy against over-bold pride, so will God now—if the man meek himself, not with fruitless despair but with fruitful penance—so set him up again upon his feet and so strengthen him with his grace, that for this one fall that the devil hath given him he shall give the devil a hundred.
And so, cousin, in a situation like this, we need to treat the man kindly and gently, using encouraging words to lift his spirits and provide comfort in every way we can. We should remind him that if he doesn’t give up, but instead find his courage and trust in God's immense mercy, he will ultimately have good reason to be thankful for this setback. Before this, he was actually in much greater danger than he realized, thinking too highly of himself. And God, out of love for him, allowed him to fall deeply into the devil's traps so he could see what he truly was while being so overconfident. So just as God let him fall as a remedy for his excessive pride, He will now—if the man humbles himself, not through pointless despair but through meaningful repentance—lift him back up and strengthen him with His grace, so that for this one fall the devil caused, he will defeat the devil a hundred times over.
And here must he be put in remembrance of Mary Magdalene, of the prophet David, and especially of St. Peter, whose high bold courage took a foul fall. And yet because he despaired not of God's mercy, but wept and called upon it, how highly God took him into his favour again is well testified in his holy scripture and well known through Christendom.
And here he should be reminded of Mary Magdalene, the prophet David, and especially St. Peter, whose great courage led to a significant downfall. However, because he did not give up on God's mercy, but instead wept and sought it, it is well documented in the holy scripture how greatly God restored him to His favor, and this is widely known throughout Christendom.
And now shall it be charitably done if some good virtuous folk, such as he himself somewhat esteemeth and hath afore longed to stand in estimation with, do resort sometimes to him, not only to give him counsel but also to ask advice and counsel of him in some cases of their own conscience. For so may they let him perceive that they esteem him now no less, but rather more than they did before, since they think him now by this fall better expert of the devil's craft and so not only better instructed himself but also better able to give good advice and counsel to others. This thing will, to my mind, well amend and lift up his courage from the peril of that desperate shame.
And now it would be kind if some good, virtuous people, like those he respects and has long wanted to impress, would occasionally come to him, not only to seek his advice but also to ask for guidance on their own moral dilemmas. This way, they can show him that they value him now even more than before, as they believe he has gained more insight into the devil's tricks through his experience. This means he’s not only better informed himself but also more capable of offering sound advice to others. I believe this will help boost his confidence and lift him out of the dangerous shame he feels.
VINCENT: Methinketh, uncle, that this would be a perilous thing. For it may peradventure make him set the less by his fall, and thereby it may cast him into his first pride or into his other sin again, the falling in to which drove him into this despair.
VINCENT: I think, uncle, that this would be a dangerous thing. It might make him care less about his downfall, and that could lead him back into his original pride or into another sin, which is what caused him to fall into this despair in the first place.
ANTHONY: I do not mean, cousin, that every fool should at adventure fall in hand with him, for so might it happen to do harm indeed.
ANTHONY: I don’t mean, cousin, that every idiot should just go and get involved with him, because that could really end up causing trouble.
But, cousin, if a learned physician have a man in hand, he can well discern when and how long some certain medicine is necessary which, if administered at another time or at that time over-long continued, might put the patient in peril. If he have his patient in an ague, for the cure of which he needeth his medicines in their working cold, yet he may hap, ere that fever be full cured, to fall into some other disease such that, unless it were helped with hot medicine, would be likely to kill the body before the fever could be cured. The physician then would for the while have his most care to the cure of that thing in which would be the most present peril. And when that were once out of jeopardy, he would do then the more exact diligence afterward about the further cure of the fever.
But, cousin, if a skilled doctor has a patient, he can clearly tell when and for how long a specific medication is needed, which, if given at a different time or too long, could put the patient at risk. If he has a patient with a fever, for which he needs to use cooling medicines, he might find that, before the fever is completely cured, the patient develops another illness that would likely be fatal unless treated with a hot medicine. The doctor would then focus on treating the most immediate threat first. Once that danger is resolved, he would then pay closer attention to fully curing the fever afterwards.
And likewise, if a ship be in peril to fall into Scilla, the fear of falling into Charibdis on the other side shall never hinder any wise master thereof from drawing himself from Scilla toward Charibdis first, in all that ever he can. But when he hath himself once so far away from Scilla that he seeth himself safe out of that danger, then will he begin to take good heed to keep himself well from the other.
And similarly, if a ship is in danger of crashing into Scylla, the fear of hitting Charybdis on the other side won’t stop a smart captain from steering away from Scylla toward Charybdis as much as he can. But once he has moved far enough away from Scylla that he feels safe from that threat, then he will start to pay close attention to avoid the other danger.
And likewise, while this man is falling down to despair and to the final destruction of himself, a good wise spiritual leech will first look unto that, and by good comfort lift up his courage. And when he seeth that peril well past, he will care for the cure of his other faults afterward. Howbeit, even in the giving of his comfort, he may find ways enough in such wise to temper his words that the men may take occasion of good courage and yet far from occasion of new relapse into his former sin. For the great part of his counsel shall be to encourage him to amendment, and that is, perdy, far from falling into sin again.
And similarly, while this man is sinking into despair and risking his own downfall, a wise and caring spiritual healer will first acknowledge this and offer comforting support to lift his spirits. Once he sees that danger has passed, he will then address his other issues. However, even in providing this comfort, he can find plenty of ways to choose his words carefully so that the man feels hopeful without leading him back into his old sins. The main focus of his advice will be to inspire change, which is, of course, a step away from falling back into sin again.
VINCENT: I think, uncle, that folk fall into this ungracious mind, through the devil's temptation, by many more means than one.
VINCENT: I think, uncle, that people fall into this ungracious mindset due to the devil's temptation in more ways than one.
ANTHONY: That is, cousin, very true. For the devil taketh his occasions as he seeth them fall convenient for him. Some he stirreth to it for weariness of themselves after some great loss, some for fear of horrible bodily harm, and some (as I said) for fear of worldly shame.
ANTHONY: That’s really true, cousin. The devil takes his opportunities whenever they come up. Some people are pushed into it because they’re exhausted after a big loss, some because they're afraid of serious physical harm, and some, as I mentioned, are driven by fear of social embarrassment.
One I knew myself who had been long reputed for a right honest man, who was fallen into such a fancy that he was well near worn away with it. But what he was tempted to do, that would he tell no man. But he told me that he was sore cumbered and that it always ran in his mind that folk's fancies were fallen from him, and that they esteemed not his wit as they were wont to do, but ever his mind gave him that the people began to take him for a fool. And folk of truth did not so at all, but reputed him both for wise and honest.
I once knew a guy who had a long-standing reputation as a genuinely honest man, but he had become so obsessed with something that it was wearing him down. He wouldn’t share with anyone what he was tempted to do. However, he told me he was really troubled and that he constantly thought people had lost their interest in him, and that they no longer valued his intelligence like they used to. He felt deep down that others were starting to see him as a fool. But those who knew the truth didn’t see it that way at all; they still regarded him as both wise and honest.
Two others I knew who were marvellous afraid that they would kill themselves, and could tell me no cause wherefore they so feared it except that their own mind so gave them. Neither had they any loss nor no such thing toward them, nor none occasion of any worldly shame (the one was in body very well liking and lusty), but wondrous weary were they both twain of that mind. And always they thought that they would not do it for anything, and nevertheless they feared they would. And wherefore they so feared neither of them both could tell. And the one, lest he should do it, desired his friends to bind him.
Two others I knew were incredibly afraid that they might harm themselves, but they couldn't explain why they felt that way except that it was just in their minds. Neither of them had experienced any loss or anything bad happening to them, nor did they have any reason for worldly shame (one was actually in great shape and full of life), yet both were completely worn out by these thoughts. They always believed they wouldn't act on it, but still, they were terrified that they might. Neither of them could explain why they felt that way. One of them, worried he might go through with it, asked his friends to restrain him.
VINCENT: This is, uncle, a marvellous strange manner.
VINCENT: This is, uncle, a wonderfully strange way.
ANTHONY: Forsooth, cousin, I suppose many of them are in this case.
ANTHONY: Truly, cousin, I think many of them are in this situation.
The devil, as I said before, seeketh his occasions. For as St. Peter saith, "Your adversary the devil as a roaring lion goeth about seeking whom he may devour." He marketh well, therefore, the state and condition that every man standeth in, not only concerning these outward things (lands, possessions, goods, authority, fame, favour, or hatred of the world), but also men's complexions within them—health or sickness, good humours or bad, by which they be light-hearted or lumpish, strong-hearted or faint and feeble of spirit, bold and hardy or timorous and fearful of courage. And according as these things minister him matter of temptation, so useth he himself in the manner of his temptation.
The devil, as I mentioned earlier, looks for his opportunities. As St. Peter says, "Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour." He pays close attention to the state and condition that each person is in, not just regarding external things (land, possessions, wealth, power, reputation, or how the world views them), but also their internal states—health or illness, good mood or bad, which influence whether they are cheerful or gloomy, strong or weak in spirit, bold or fearful. Depending on how these factors present him with opportunities for temptation, he adjusts his approach to temptation accordingly.
Now likewise as in such folk as are full of young warm lusty blood and other humours exciting the flesh to filthy voluptuous living, the devil useth to make those things his instruments in tempting them and provoking them to it; and as, where he findeth some folk full of hot blood and choler, he maketh those humours his instruments to set their hearts on fire in wrath and fierce furious anger; so where he findeth some folk who, through some dull melancholy humours, are naturally disposed to fear, he casteth sometimes such a fearful imagination into their mind that without help of God they can never cast it out of their heart.
Now, just like with people who are filled with youthful, passionate energy and other feelings that push them towards indulgent living, the devil uses those things as tools to tempt and provoke them. Similarly, when he finds people full of hot blood and anger, he uses those emotions to ignite their hearts with wrath and fierce rage. Likewise, when he encounters individuals who, due to some dull, melancholic feelings, are naturally inclined to fear, he sometimes plants such a frightening thought in their minds that, without God's help, they can never get rid of it from their hearts.
Some, at the sudden falling of some horrible thought into their mind, have not only had a great abomination at it (which abomination they well and virtuously had), but the devil, using their melancholy humour and thereby their natural inclination to fear for his instruments, hath caused them to conceive therewith such a deep dread besides that they think themselves with that abominable thought to be fallen into such an outrageous sin that they are ready to fall into despair of grace, believing that God hath given them over for ever. Whereas that thought, were it never so horrible and never so abominable, is yet unto those who never like it, but ever still abhor it and strive still against it, matter of conflict and merit and not any sin at all.
Some people, when confronted with a terrible thought entering their mind, not only feel a strong revulsion towards it (which is a completely justified response), but the devil, taking advantage of their gloomy mindset and their natural tendency to fear, has led them to experience such intense dread that they believe this unacceptable thought signifies they've committed an awful sin, pushing them to despair and think that God has abandoned them forever. However, that thought, no matter how horrible or repulsive, is still a source of struggle and merit for those who dislike it, constantly reject it, and keep fighting against it—it is not a sin at all.
Some have, with holding a knife in their hand, suddenly thought upon the killing of themselves, and forthwith, in devising what a horrible thing it would be if they should mishap to do so, have fallen into a fear that they would do so indeed. And they have, with long and often thinking thereon, imprinted that fear so sore in their imagination, that some of them have not afterwards cast it off without great difficulty. And some could never in their life be rid of it, but have afterward in conclusion miserably done it indeed. But like as, where the devil useth the blood of a man's own body toward his purpose in provoking him to lechery, the man must and doth with grace and wisdom resist it; so must the man do whose melancholy humours and devil abuseth, toward the casting of such a desperate dread into his heart.
Some people, while holding a knife, suddenly think about killing themselves, and right away, as they consider how terrible it would be if they accidentally did, they become fearful that they actually might. They have often thought about it so much that this fear becomes deeply embedded in their imagination, making it hard for some to shake off later. Some could never get rid of it in their lives and unfortunately ended up going through with it. Just as when the devil uses a person's own blood to provoke him into lust, that person must resist it with grace and wisdom; so too must a man who's plagued by his own dark thoughts actively fight against the desperate fear in his heart.
VINCENT: I pray you, uncle, what advice would be to be given him in such a case?
VINCENT: Please, Uncle, what advice should we give him in this situation?
ANTHONY: Surely, methinketh his help standeth in two things: counsel and prayer.
ANTHONY: Surely, I think his help comes from two things: advice and prayer.
First, as concerning counsel: Like as it may be that he hath two things that hold him in his temptation; that is, some evil humours of his own body, and the cursed devil that abuseth them to his pernicious purpose, so must he needs against them twain the counsel of two manner of folk; that is, physicians for the body and physicians for the soul. The bodily physician shall consider what abundance of these evil humours the man hath, that the devil maketh his instruments, in moving the man toward that fearful affection. And he shall proceed by fitting diet and suitable medicines to resist them, as well as by purgations to disburden the body of them.
First, regarding counsel: Just as it may be that he has two things that lead him into temptation—some bad influences from his own body and the wicked devil who uses them for his harmful purposes—he must seek advice from two types of people: doctors for the body and doctors for the soul. The physical doctor will examine how many of these bad influences the person has, which the devil uses as tools to push him toward that troubling emotion. He will proceed with the right diet and appropriate medications to combat them, as well as through cleansing treatments to rid the body of them.
Let no man think it strange that I would advise a man to take counsel for the body, in such spiritual suffering. For since the body and the soul are so knit and joined together that they both make between them one person, the distemperance of either one engendereth sometimes the distemperance of both twain. And therefore I would advise every man in every sickness of the body to be shriven and to seek of a good spiritual physician the sure health of his soul. For this shall not only serve against peril that may peradventure grow further by that sickness than in the beginning men think were likely, but the comfort of it (and God's favour increasing with it) shall also do the body good. For this cause the blessed apostle St. James exhorteth men in their bodily sickness to call in the priests, and saith that it shall do them good both in body and soul. So likewise would I sometimes advise some men, in some sickness of the soul, besides their spiritual leech, to take also some counsel of the physician for the body. Some who are wretchedly disposed, and yet long to be more vicious than they are, go to physicians and apothecaries and enquire what things may serve them to make them more lusty to their foul fleshly delight. And would it then be any folly, on the other hand, if he who feeleth himself against his will much moved unto such uncleanness, should enquire of the physician what things, without diminishing his health, would be suitable for the diminishing of such foul fleshly motion?
Let no one find it odd that I would suggest a person seek advice for their body while experiencing such spiritual suffering. Since the body and soul are so intertwined that together they form one person, any imbalance in either can sometimes lead to issues in both. Therefore, I would recommend that anyone who is physically unwell should confess and seek help from a good spiritual doctor for the health of their soul. This not only protects against the potential worsening of the illness beyond what people initially think likely, but the comfort from it (along with God's favor increasing) will also benefit the body. For this reason, the blessed apostle St. James encourages people in their physical illnesses to call on priests, stating it will benefit both their body and soul. Similarly, I would sometimes suggest that individuals, in certain soul sicknesses, should seek advice from a physical doctor in addition to their spiritual healer. Some people, who are sadly inclined towards vice and wish to indulge even more, go to doctors and pharmacists to ask what they can take to enhance their sinful pleasures. Would it then be foolish for someone who feels a strong, unwelcome urge toward such impurity to ask a doctor what remedies, without harming their health, could reduce such base desires?
Of spiritual counsel, the first is to be shriven, that the devil have not the more power upon him by reason of his other sins.
Of spiritual guidance, the first is to confess, so that the devil has less power over him due to his other sins.
VINCENT: I have heard some say, uncle, that when such folk have been at shrift, their temptation hath been the more hot upon them than it was before.
VINCENT: I’ve heard some people say, uncle, that when those folks have gone to confession, their temptations hit them harder than before.
ANTHONY: That think I very well, but that is a special token that shrift is wholesome for them, since the devil is most wroth with it. You find, in some places in the gospel, that the devil did most trouble the person whom he possessed when he saw that Christ would cast him out. Otherwise, we must let the devil do what he will, if we fear his anger, for with every good deed will he wax angry.
ANTHONY: I understand that well, but that’s a clear sign that confession is good for them, since the devil is really angry about it. You see in some parts of the gospel that the devil would trouble the person he possessed the most when he knew that Christ was going to chase him out. Otherwise, we’d have to let the devil do whatever he wants if we’re afraid of his wrath, because he’ll get mad with every good deed.
Then is it in his shrift to be told him that he not only feareth more than he needeth, but also feareth where he needeth not. And besides that, he is sorry for a thing for which, unless he will willingly turn his good into his harm, he hath more cause to be glad.
Then he needs to be told in his confession that he not only fears more than he should, but also fears where he shouldn’t. Plus, he feels sorry for something that, unless he intentionally turns his good into his bad, he has more reason to be happy about.
First, if he have cause to fear, yet feareth he more than he needeth. For there is no devil so diligent to destroy him as God is to preserve him; nor no devil so near him to do him harm as God is to do him good. Nor are all the devils in hell so strong to invade and assault him as God is to defend him if he distrust him not but faithfully put his trust in him.
First, if he has cause to fear, he fears more than he needs to. There is no devil as determined to destroy him as God is to protect him; nor is there any devil so close to do him harm as God is to do him good. And all the devils in hell are not as strong to invade and attack him as God is to defend him if he doesn’t distrust Him but instead puts his trust in Him faithfully.
He feareth also where he needeth not. For he dreadeth that he were out of God's favour, because such horrible thoughts fall into his mind, but he must understand that while they fall into his mind against his will they are not imputed unto him.
He also fears when he doesn’t need to. He is scared that he’s out of God’s favor because such horrible thoughts come to his mind, but he needs to understand that as long as they come into his mind against his will, they are not held against him.
He is, finally, sad of that of which he may be glad. For since he taketh such thoughts displeasantly, and striveth and fighteth against them, he hath thereby a good token that he is in God's favour, and that God assisteth him and helpeth him. And he may make himself sure that so will God never cease to do, unless he himself fail and fall from him first. And beside that, this conflict that he hath against the temptation shall, if he will not fall where he need not, be an occasion of his merit and of a right great reward in heaven. And the pain that he taketh therein shall for so much, as Master Gerson well showeth, stand him in stead of his purgatory.
He is, in the end, upset about things he could actually be happy about. Since he finds these thoughts unpleasant and fights against them, it’s a good sign that he has God’s favor and that God supports him. He can be sure that God will always do this, as long as he doesn’t turn away from Him first. Additionally, this struggle against temptation will, if he doesn’t give in when he doesn’t need to, be a source of his merit and a significant reward in heaven. The pain he experiences in this struggle, as Master Gerson points out, will serve in place of his purgatory.
The manner of the fight against temptation must stand in three things: that is, in resisting, and in contemning, and in the invocation of help.
The approach to fighting temptation must include three things: resisting it, disregarding it, and calling for help.
Resist must a man for his own part with reason, considering what a folly it would be to fall where he need not, since he is not driven to it in avoiding of any other pain or in hope of winning any manner of pleasure, but contrariwise he would by that fall lose everlasting bliss and fall into everlasting pain. And if it were in avoiding of other great pain, yet could he avoid none so great thereby as the one he should thereby fall into.
A person must use reason to resist temptation, thinking about how foolish it would be to give in when there's no real need to do so. He isn't being forced into it to escape some other pain or to gain any kind of pleasure. On the contrary, giving in would mean losing eternal happiness and falling into endless suffering. Even if he were trying to avoid a different kind of great pain, he wouldn't escape anything worse than the pain he would end up facing instead.
He must also consider that a great part of this temptation is in effect but the fear of his own fancy, the dread that he hath lest he shall once be driven to it. For he may be sure that (unless he himself will, of his own folly) all the devils in hell can never drive him to it, but his own foolish imagination may. For it fareth in his temptation like a man going over a high bridge who waxeth so afraid, through his own fancy, that he falleth down indeed, when he would otherwise be able enough to pass over without any danger. For a man upon such a bridge, if folk call upon him, "You fall, you fall!" may fall with the fancy that he taketh thereof; although, if folk looked merrily upon him and said, "There is no danger therein," he would pass over the bridge well enough—and he would not hesitate to run upon it, if it were but a foot from the ground. So, in this temptation, the devil findeth the man of his own foolish fancy afraid and then crieth in the ear of his heart, "Thou fallest, thou fallest!" and maketh the foolish man afraid that he should, at every foot, fall indeed. And the devil so wearieth him with that continual fear, if he give the ear of his heart to him, that at last he withdraweth his mind from due remembrance of God, and then driveth him to that deadly mischief indeed. Therefore, like as, against the vice of the flesh, the victory standeth not all in the fight, but sometimes also in the flight (saving that it is indeed a part of a wise warrior's fight to flee from his enemies' traps), so must a man in this temptation too, not only resist it always with reasoning against it, but sometimes set it clear at right naught and cast it off when it cometh and not once regard it so much as to vouchsafe to think thereon.
He must also realize that a big part of this temptation is really just the fear of his own imagination, the worry that he might end up giving in to it. He can be certain that (unless he chooses to do so out of his own foolishness) all the devils in hell can never force him into it, but his own silly thoughts might. It’s like someone walking across a high bridge, who becomes so scared, thanks to his own imagination, that he actually falls when he would otherwise be able to cross safely. If someone on that bridge hears people shouting, "You're going to fall!" he might fall just based on that idea; however, if others smiled at him and said, "There's no danger," he would cross the bridge just fine—and he wouldn't hesitate to run across it if it were only a foot off the ground. So, in this temptation, the devil finds the person already frightened by his own foolish thoughts and then whispers in his heart, "You're going to fall, you're going to fall!" and makes the foolish man anxious that he might actually fall at every step. The devil tires him out with that constant fear, and if he listens to it, he eventually pulls his mind away from remembering God, leading him to serious harm. Therefore, just as in resisting the desires of the flesh, victory isn’t just about fighting but sometimes also about fleeing (although it is indeed a wise warrior’s strategy to avoid traps set by enemies), a person facing this temptation must not only constantly reason against it but sometimes completely dismiss it and reject it when it arises, without even bothering to think about it.
Some folk have been clearly rid of such pestilent fancies with very full contempt of them, making a cross upon their hearts and bidding the devil avaunt. And sometimes they laugh him to scorn too, and then turn their mind unto some other matter. And when the devil hath seen that they have set so little by him, after certain essays, made in such times as he thought most fitting, he hath given that temptation quite over. And this he doth not only because the proud spirit cannot endure to be mocked, but also lest, with much tempting the man to the sin to which he could not in conclusion bring him, he should much increase his merit.
Some people have clearly rid themselves of such harmful thoughts by completely dismissing them, crossing their hearts and telling the devil to go away. Sometimes they even laugh at him and then shift their focus to something else. When the devil sees that they think so little of him, after trying several times when he thought it was best, he eventually stops bothering them with that temptation. He does this not only because a proud spirit can't handle being laughed at, but also because he wouldn’t want to increase the person's worth by trying to tempt them to a sin he ultimately couldn’t make them commit.
The final fight is by invocation of help unto God, both praying for himself and desiring others also to pray for him—both poor folk for his alms and other good folk of their charity, especially good priests in that holy sacred service of the Mass. And not only them but also his own good angel and other holy saints such as his devotion specially doth stand unto. Or, if he be learned, let him use then the litany, with the holy suffrages that follow, which is a prayer in the church of marvellous old antiquity. For it was not made first, as some believe, by that holy man St. Gregory (which opinion arose from the fact that, in the time of a great pestilence in Rome, he caused the whole city to go in solemn procession with it), but it was in use in the church many years before St. Gregory's days, as well appeareth by the books of other holy doctors and saints, who were dead hundreds of years before St. Gregory was born.
The final fight is about asking for help from God, both praying for himself and hoping that others also pray for him—both poor people for his charity and other kind people out of their goodwill, especially good priests during the sacred service of the Mass. And not just them, but also his own good angel and other holy saints to whom he feels especially devoted. If he is learned, he should use the litany, along with the holy prayers that follow, which is a prayer in the church with a long history. Contrary to popular belief, it wasn’t first created by the holy man St. Gregory (that belief arose because, during a great plague in Rome, he led the whole city in a solemn procession with it), but it had been used in the church many years before St. Gregory’s time, as is evident from the writings of other holy doctors and saints who lived hundreds of years before St. Gregory was born.
And holy St. Bernard giveth counsel that every man should make suit unto angels and saints to pray for him to God in the things that he would have furthered by his holy hand. If any man will stick at that, and say it needs not, because God can hear us himself; and will also say that it is perilous to do so because (they say) we are not so counseled by scripture, I will not dispute the matter here. He who will not do it, I hinder him not to leave it undone. But yet for mine own part, I will as well trust to the counsel of St. Bernard, and reckon him for as good and as well learned in scripture, as any man whom I hear say the contrary. And better dare I jeopard my soul with the soul of St. Bernard than with that of him who findeth that fault in his doctrine.
And holy St. Bernard advises that everyone should ask angels and saints to pray to God for the things they want His holy help with. If someone wants to argue against this, saying it’s unnecessary because God can hear us directly, or that it’s risky because (they claim) we aren’t instructed to do so by scripture, I won’t debate it here. If someone chooses not to do it, I won’t stop them from leaving it out. But personally, I trust St. Bernard’s advice and consider him as knowledgeable in scripture as anyone who disagrees. I’d rather risk my soul with St. Bernard than with someone who criticizes his teachings.
Unto God himself every good man counseleth to have recourse above all. And, in this temptation, to have special remembrance of Christ's passion, and pray him for the honour of his death, the ground of man's salvation, to keep this person thus tempted form that damnable death.
To God himself, every good person advises turning to Him above all else. And during this temptation, it's important to especially remember Christ's suffering and pray to Him for the honor of His death, the foundation of humanity's salvation, to protect this person being tempted from that dreadful fate.
Special verses may be drawn out of the psalter, against the devil's wicked temptations—as, for example, "Exsurgat Deus et dissipentur inimici eius, et fugiant qui oderunt eum a facie eius," and many others—which in such horrible temptation are pleasing to God and to the devil very terrible. But none is more terrible nor more odious to the devil than the words with which our Saviour drove him away himself: "Vade Sathana." And no prayer is more acceptable unto God, nor more effectual in its matter, than those words which our Saviour hath taught us himself, "Ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo." And I doubt not, by God's grace, but that he who in such a temptation will use good counsel and prayer and keep himself in good virtuous business and good virtuous company and abide in the faithful hope of God's help, he shall have the truth of God (as the prophet saith in the verse afore rehearsed) so compass him about with a shield that he shall not need to dread this night's fear of this wicked temptation.
Special verses can be taken from the psalter to counter the devil's wicked temptations, like, for example, "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered; let those who hate Him flee from His presence," and many others—which are pleasing to God and terrifying to the devil during such horrible temptations. But none are more dreadful or loathed by the devil than the words with which our Savior drove him away: "Get behind me, Satan." And no prayer is more acceptable to God or more effective than the words our Savior taught us: "And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil." I have no doubt, by God's grace, that anyone who, in such a temptation, follows good advice, prays, stays engaged in virtuous actions and good company, and holds onto the faithful hope of God's help will be surrounded by the truth of God (as the prophet says in the verse mentioned earlier) like a shield, so he won’t have to fear the terrors of this wicked temptation tonight.
And thus will I finish this piece of the night's fear. And glad am
I that we are past it, and come once unto the day, to those other
words of the prophet, "A sagitta volante in die." For methinketh
I have made it a long night!
And so, I’ll wrap up this part of the night’s fear. I’m glad
that we’ve made it through and have come to the day, to those other
words of the prophet, "A sagitta volante in die." Because it feels
like I’ve been through a long night!
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, so have you, but we have not slept in it, but been very well occupied. But now I fear that unless you make here a pause till you have dined, you shall keep yourself from your dinner over-long.
VINCENT: Seriously, uncle, you have too, but we haven't slept in it; we’ve been quite busy. But now I’m worried that if you don’t take a break until you’ve had dinner, you’re going to miss your meal.
ANTHONY: Nay, nay, cousin, for I broke my fast even as you came in. And also you shall find this night and this day like a winter day and a winter night. For as the winter hath short days and long nights, so shall you find that I made you not this fearful night so long but what I shall make you this light courageous day as short.
ANTHONY: No, no, cousin, I just finished eating as you walked in. You’ll find that tonight and today are just like a winter day and night. Just as winter has short days and long nights, you'll see that I didn’t make this scary night so long, but I’ll make this brave day just as short.
And so shall the matter require well of itself indeed. For in these words of the prophet, "The truth of God shall compass thee round about with a shield from the arrow flying in the day," I understand the arrow of pride, with which the devil tempteth a man, not in the night (that is, in tribulation and adversity), for that time is too discomfortable and too fearful for pride, but in the day (that is, in prosperity), for that time is full of lightsome pleasure and courage. But surely this worldly prosperity in which a man so rejoiceth and of which the devil maketh him so proud, is but a very short winter day. For we begin, many full poor and cold, and up we fly like an arrow shot into the air. And yet when we be suddenly shot up into the highest, ere we be well warm there, down we come unto the cold ground again. And then even there stick we still. And yet for the short while that we be upward and aloft—Lord, how lusty and how proud we be, buzzing above busily, as a bumblebee flieth about in summer, never aware that she shall die in winter! And so fare many of us, God help us. For in the short winter day of worldly wealth and prosperity, this flying arrow of the devil, this high spirit of pride, shot out of the devil's bow and piercing through our heart, beareth us up in our affection aloft into the clouds, where we think we sit on the rainbow and overlook the world under us, accounting in the regard of our own glory such other poor souls as were peradventure wont to be our fellows for silly poor pismires and ants.
And so the matter will take care of itself. For in the prophet’s words, "The truth of God will surround you like a shield from the arrows flying during the day," I understand the arrow of pride, with which the devil tempts a person, not in the night (which represents times of hardship and struggle), because that time is too uncomfortable and frightening for pride, but in the day (which means during times of prosperity), because that time is full of lighthearted pleasure and confidence. But truly, this worldly prosperity that makes a person so happy and which the devil uses to make him proud is just a very short winter day. We start off poor and cold, and then we rise up like an arrow shot into the sky. Yet when we are suddenly lifted to the highest point, before we have a chance to settle in, we come crashing back down to the cold ground again. And then we get stuck there. For the brief time that we are elevated—oh Lord, how vibrant and proud we become, buzzing about like a bumblebee in summer, never realizing that we'll die in winter! And many of us experience this, God help us. For during the short winter day of worldly wealth and success, this flying arrow of the devil, this lofty spirit of pride, shot from the devil's bow and piercing through our heart, lifts us up in our hearts into the clouds, where we think we sit on the rainbow overlooking the world below, considering other poor souls who might have once been our companions as nothing more than silly little ants.
But though this arrow of pride fly never so high in the clouds, and though the man whom it carrieth up so high be never so joyful thereof, yet let him remember that, be this arrow never so light, it hath yet a heavy iron head. And therefore, fly it never so high, down must it needs come, and on the ground must it light. And sometimes it falleth not in a very cleanly place, but the pride turneth into rebuke and shame and there is then all the glory gone.
But even if this arrow of pride soars high into the clouds, and even if the person it carries feels incredibly joyful about it, they should remember that no matter how light this arrow seems, it still has a heavy iron tip. So, no matter how high it flies, it must eventually come down and land on the ground. Sometimes it lands in a pretty messy spot, and pride can quickly turn into embarrassment and shame, leading to the loss of all glory.
Of this arrow speaketh the wise man in the fifth chapter of the book of Wisdom, where he saith in the person of them that in pride and vanity passed the time of this present life, and after that so spent, passed hence into hell: "What hath pride profited us? Or what good hath the glory of our riches done unto us? Passed are all those things like a shadow . . . or like an arrow shot out into the place appointed; the air that was divided is forthwith returned unto the place, and in such wise closed together again that the way is not perceived in which the arrow went. And in like wise we, as soon as we were born, are forthwith vanished away, and have left no token of any good virtue behind us, but are consumed and wasted and come to naught in our malignity. They, lo, that have lived here in sin, such words have they spoken when they lay in hell."
Of this arrow, the wise man speaks in the fifth chapter of the book of Wisdom, where he expresses the thoughts of those who, in pride and vanity, spent their present lives and then moved on to hell: "What did pride gain us? What good did the glory of our riches do for us? All those things have passed like a shadow... or like an arrow shot into the designated spot; the air that was split quickly returns to its place, and it closes up so well that the path the arrow took is not visible. Similarly, we, as soon as we were born, quickly disappeared and left no mark of any good virtue behind, but we are consumed and wasted and come to nothing in our wickedness. Those who lived in sin here have spoken such words when they found themselves in hell."
Here shall you, good cousin, consider, that whereas the scripture here speaketh of the arrow shot into its place appointed or intended, in the shooting of this arrow of pride there be divers purposings and appointings. For the proud man himself hath no certain purpose or appointment at any mark, butt, or prick upon earth, at which he determineth to shoot and there to stick and tarry. But ever he shooteth as children do, who love to shoot up cop-high, to see how high their arrow can fly up. But now doth the devil intend and appoint a certain mark, surely set in a place into which he purposeth—fly this arrow never so high and the proud heart on it—to have them both alight at last, and that place is in the very pit of hell. There is set the devil's well-acquainted prick and his very just mark. And with his pricking shaft of pride he hath by himself a plain proof and experience that down upon this prick (unless it be stopped by some grace of God on the way) the soul that flieth up with it can never fail to fall. For when he himself was in heaven and began to fly cop-high, with the lusty light flight of pride, saying, "I will fly up above the stars and set my throne on the sides of the north, and will be like unto the Highest," long ere he could fly up half so high as he said in his heart that he would, he was turned from a bright glorious angel into a dark deformed devil, and from flying any further upward, down was he thrown into the deep dungeon of hell.
Here, good cousin, consider this: while the scripture talks about an arrow shot to its intended target, in the case of the arrow of pride, there are multiple intentions and targets. A proud person doesn’t aim at any specific target, place, or goal on earth where they plan to land and stay. Instead, they shoot like children who enjoy seeing how high they can launch their arrows. However, the devil has a clear target in mind, a specific place he intends for this arrow to land—no matter how high it flies, the proud heart on it will eventually end up in the pit of hell. That is the devil's well-known mark and just target. He knows from his own experience that without some grace from God to stop it, the soul that rises with pride will inevitably fall onto that mark. When he was in heaven and tried to fly higher than he should, declaring, "I will rise above the stars and set my throne on the northern mount, and be like the Most High," before he could reach anywhere near that height, he was cast down from a glorious angel to a dark, twisted devil and thrown into the depths of hell.
Now may it, peradventure, cousin, seem that, since this kind of temptation of pride is no tribulation or pain, all this that we speak of this sorrow of pride flying forth in the day of prosperity, would be beside our matter.
Now, cousin, it might seem that since this type of temptation of pride isn't really a trial or pain, everything we say about this sorrow of pride appearing in the time of prosperity would be irrelevant to our discussion.
VINCENT: Verily, mine uncle, and so seemed it unto me. And somewhat was I minded so to say to you, too, saving that, whether it were properly pertaining to the present matter or somewhat digressing from it, methought it was good matter and such as I had no wish to leave.
VINCENT: Seriously, my uncle, that’s how it felt to me too. I was actually planning to say that to you as well, but I wasn’t sure if it was directly related to what we’re discussing or if it was a bit off-topic. I thought it was worth discussing, and I didn't want to let it go.
ANTHONY: But now must you consider, cousin, that though prosperity be contrary to tribulation, yet unto many a good man the devil's temptation to pride in prosperity is a greater tribulation, and more hath need of good comfort and good counsel both, than he who never felt it would believe. And that is the thing, cousin, that maketh me speak of it as of a thing proper to this matter. For, cousin, as it is a right hard thing to touch pitch and never defile the fingers, to put flax unto fire and yet keep them from burning, to keep a serpent in thy bosom and yet be safe from stinging, to put young men with young women without danger of foul fleshly desire—so it is hard for any person, either man or woman, in great worldly wealth and much prosperity, so to withstand the suggestions of the devil and occasions given by the world that they keep themselves from the deadly danger of ambitious glory. And if a man fall into it, there followeth upon it a whole flood of all unhappy mischief: arrogant manner, high solemn bearing, overlooking the poor in word and countenance, displeasant and disdainful behaviour, ravine, extortion, oppression, hatred and cruelty.
ANTHONY: But now you need to consider, cousin, that even though prosperity contrasts with hardship, for many good people, the devil's temptation to become prideful in their success is a far greater struggle, requiring just as much comfort and advice as someone who has never faced it would think. And that’s why I mention it as relevant to this discussion. Because, cousin, just as it's extremely difficult to touch something dirty without getting your hands stained, to put something flammable to fire and not get burned, to keep a snake close and not get bitten, or to put young men and women together without risking inappropriate desire—it's just as hard for anyone, whether man or woman, who has great wealth and success to resist the devil's whispers and the temptations the world throws at them to avoid the deadly trap of ambitious pride. If someone falls into that trap, it brings a whole wave of problems: arrogance, a pompous attitude, looking down on the poor in words and actions, unpleasant and disdainful behavior, robbery, exploitation, oppression, hatred, and cruelty.
Now, many a good man, cousin, come into great authority, casteth in his mind the peril of such occasions of pride as the devil taketh of prosperity to make his instruments of, with which to move men to such high point of presumption as engendereth so many great evils. And, feeling the devil therewith offering him suggestions to it, he is sore troubled therewith. And some fall so afraid of it that even in the day of prosperity they fall into the night's fear of pusillanimity, and they leave the things undone in which they might use themselves well. And mistrusting the aid and help of God in holding them upright in their temptations, whereby for faint heart they leave off good business in which they would be well occupied. And, under pretext (as it seemeth to themselves) of humble heart and meekness, and of serving God in contemplation and silence, they seek their own ease and earthly rest unawares. And with this, if it be so, God is not well content.
Now, many good men, cousin, who rise to great authority often think about the dangers of pride that the devil uses in times of success to manipulate people. Feeling the devil tempting them with these thoughts, they become very troubled. Some become so frightened that even during their successes, they fall into a fearful state of timidity and neglect the opportunities where they could do well. Distrusting God's support in helping them stand firm against temptation, they abandon good work that would be beneficial for them. Under the guise of being humble and meek, and of serving God through contemplation and silence, they unknowingly seek their own comfort and earthly rest. If that's the case, God is not pleased.
Howbeit, if it be so that a man, by the experience that he hath of himself, perceiveth that in wealth and authority he doth his own soul harm, and cannot do the good that to his part appertaineth; but seeth the things that he should set his hands to sustain, decay through his default and fall to ruin under him, and seeth that to the amendment thereof he leaveth his own duty undone; then would I in any wise advise him to leave off that thing—be it spiritual benefice that he have, parsonage or bishopric, or temporal office and authority—and rather give it over quite and draw himself aside and serve God, than to take the worldly worship and commodity for himself, with incommodity of those whom his duty would be to profit.
However, if a person realizes through their own experience that their wealth and authority are harming their soul, and they can't do the good they are supposed to, but instead see the things they should be supporting declining and falling apart because of their negligence, and notice that fixing these issues means neglecting their own responsibilities; then I would definitely advise them to give up that role—whether it’s a church position like a parish or bishopric, or a secular job and authority—and instead walk away to serve God, rather than pursue worldly recognition and benefits at the expense of those they should be helping.
But, on the other hand, he may not see the contrary but what he may do his duty conveniently well, and may fear nothing but that the temptations of ambition and pride may peradventure turn his good purpose and make him decline unto sin. I deny not that it is well done to stand always in moderate fear, for the scripture saith, "Blessed is the man that is always fearful," and St. Paul saith, "He that standeth, let him look that he fall not." Yet is over-much fear perilous and draweth toward the mistrust of God's gracious help. This immoderate fear and faint heart holy scripture forbiddeth, saying, "Be not feeble-hearted or timorous." Let such a man therefore temper his fear with good hope, and think that since God hath set him in that place (if he think that God have set him in it), God will assist him with his grace to use it well. Howbeit, if he came to it by simony or some such other evils means, then that would be one good reason wherefore he should rather leave it off. But otherwise let him continue in his good business. And, against the devil's provocation unto evil, let him bless himself and call unto God and pray, and look that the devil tempt him not to lean the more toward the contrary.
But, on the flip side, he might only see that he can do his duty well, and worry only that the temptations of ambition and pride might lead him away from his good intentions and into sin. I won’t deny that it’s a good idea to always have a healthy level of fear, because scripture says, “Blessed is the man who is always cautious,” and St. Paul says, “He who stands firm should be careful not to fall.” However, too much fear is dangerous and can lead to doubt in God’s help. Holy scripture warns against this excessive fear and cowardice, saying, “Don’t be weak-hearted or fearful.” Therefore, he should balance his fear with hope, trusting that since God has placed him in that position (if he believes God placed him there), God will support him with grace to do well. However, if he got there through simony or some other wrongful means, that would be a good reason to step away from it. Otherwise, he should keep up his good work. And, in response to the devil’s temptation to do wrong, he should bless himself, call on God, pray, and ensure the devil doesn’t lead him more towards the opposite.
Let him pity and comfort those who are in distress and affliction. I mean not that he should let every malefactor pass forth unpunished, and freely run out and rob at random. But in his heart let him be sorry to see that of necessity, for fear of decaying the common weal, men are driven to put malefactors to pain. And yet where he findeth good tokens and likelihood of amendment, there let him help all that he can that mercy may be had. There shall never lack desperately disposed wretched enough besides, upon whom, as an example, justice can proceed. Let him think, in his own heart, that every poor beggar is his fellow.
Let him have compassion and support for those who are suffering and in trouble. I don’t mean that he should allow every criminal to go unpunished or run wild committing theft. But in his heart, he should feel sorrow knowing that, sadly, out of concern for the well-being of the community, people are forced to inflict pain on criminals. Yet, where he sees good signs and a chance for improvement, he should do everything he can to ensure that mercy is granted. There will always be enough desperate people who deserve punishment, serving as an example for justice to take action. He should remember that every poor beggar is his equal.
VINCENT: That will be very hard, uncle, for an honourable man to do, when he beholdeth himself richly apparelled and the beggar rigged in his rags.
VINCENT: That will be really difficult, uncle, for an honorable man to do when he sees himself dressed in fine clothes and the beggar wearing rags.
ANTHONY: If there were here, cousin, two men who were both beggars, and afterward a great rich man would take one unto him, and tell him that for a little time he would have him in his house, and thereupon arrayed him in silk and gave him a great bag by his side, filled even with gold, but giving him this catch therewith: that, within a little while, out he should go in his old rags again, and bear never a penny with him—if this beggar met his fellow now, while his gay gown was on, might he not, for all his gay gear, take him for his fellow still? And would he not be a very fool if, for a wealth of a few weeks, he would think himself far his better?
ANTHONY: If there were two men here, cousin, who were both beggars, and then a wealthy man took one of them in, telling him that he would stay with him for a short time, dressing him in silk and giving him a large bag filled with gold, but with the condition that soon he would go back to his old rags with nothing—if this beggar ran into his friend while he was still wearing his fancy clothes, wouldn’t he still see him as his equal? And wouldn’t he be quite foolish to think he was better just because he had riches for a few weeks?
VINCENT: Yes, uncle, if the difference in their state were no other.
VINCENT: Yes, uncle, if their situation were no different.
ANTHONY: Surely, cousin, methinketh that in this world, between the richest and the most poor, the difference is scant so much. For let the highest look on the most base, and consider how they both came into this world. And then let him consider further that, howsoever rich he be now, he shall yet, within a while— peradventure less than one week—walk out again as poor as that beggar shall. And then, by my troth, methinketh this rich man much more than mad if, for the wealth of a little while—haply less than one week—he reckon himself in earnest any better than the beggar's fellow.
ANTHONY: Surely, cousin, I think that in this world, the difference between the richest and the poorest isn't that much. Let the highest look at the lowest and consider how they both came into this world. Then let him think further that, no matter how rich he is now, he will eventually—maybe in less than a week—leave this world just as poor as that beggar. And honestly, I think this rich man is quite mad if he believes for even a moment that the wealth he possesses for a little while—perhaps less than a week—makes him any better than the beggar.
And less than thus can no man think, who hath any natural wit and well useth it. But now a Christian man, cousin, who hath the light of faith, he cannot fail to think much further in this thing. For he will think not only upon his bare coming hither and his bare going hence again, but also the dreadful judgment of God, and upon the fearful pains of hell and the inestimable joys of heaven. And in the considering of these things, he will call to remembrance that peradventure when this beggar and he are both departed hence, the beggar may be suddenly set up in such royalty that well were he himself that ever was he born if he might be made his fellow. And he who well bethinketh him, cousin, upon these things, I verily think that the arrow of pride flying forth in the day of worldly wealth shall never so wound his heart that ever it shall bear him up one foot.
And no one with a good head on their shoulders can think any less than this. But now a Christian man, cousin, who has the light of faith, can’t help but think even deeper about this. He considers not just his arrival here and his eventual departure, but also the terrifying judgment of God, the dreadful pains of hell, and the unimaginable joys of heaven. While reflecting on these things, he may remember that perhaps when both he and this beggar have passed away, the beggar might be exalted to such royalty that he would be glad he was ever born if he could be his equal. And he who truly reflects on these matters, cousin, I genuinely believe that the arrow of pride, which may fly through the day of worldly wealth, will never wound his heart so deeply that it could lift him even the slightest bit.
But now, to the intent that he may think on such things the better, let him use often to resort to confession. And there let him open his heart and, by the mouth of some virtuous ghostly father, have such things often renewed in his remembrance. Let him also choose himself some secret solitary place in his own house, as far from noise and company as he conveniently can, and thither let him sometimes secretly resort alone, imagining himself as one going out of the world even straight unto the giving up his reckoning unto God of his sinful living. There, before an altar or some pitiful image of Christ's bitter passion, the beholding of which may put him in remembrance of the thing and move him to devout compassion, let him then kneel down or fall prostrate as at the feet of almighty God, verily believing him to be there invisibly present, as without any doubt he is. There let him open his heart to God and confess his faults, such as he can call to mind, and pray God for forgiveness. Let him call to remembrance the benefits that God hath given him, either in general among other men or privately to himself, and give him humble hearty thanks for them. There let him declare unto God the temptations of the devil, the suggestions of the flesh, the occasions of the world—and of his worldly friends, much worse many times in drawing a man from God than are his most mortal enemies, as our Saviour witnesseth himself where he saith, "The enemies of a man are they that are his own familiars." There let him lament and bewail unto God his own frailty, negligence, and sloth in resisting and withstanding of temptation; his readiness and proneness to fall into it. There let him lamentably beseech God, of his gracious aid and help, to strengthen his infirmity—both to keep him from falling and, when he by his own fault misfortuneth to fall, then with the helping hand of his merciful grace to lift him up and set him on his feet in the state of his grace again. And let this man not doubt but that God heareth him and granteth him gladly his boon.
But now, so that he can reflect on these things more effectively, he should often go to confession. There, he should open his heart and, through the words of a kind spiritual advisor, have these matters frequently brought back to his mind. He should also choose a private, quiet spot in his home, as far from noise and company as he can manage, and sometimes sneak away there alone, picturing himself as someone leaving the world to account to God for his sinful life. There, in front of an altar or a sorrowful image of Christ’s passion, which should remind him of these events and inspire him to heartfelt compassion, he should kneel or lay down as if at the feet of Almighty God, truly believing He is present there invisibly, as He undoubtedly is. There, he should open his heart to God and confess his faults, recalling as many as he can, and ask God for forgiveness. He should remember the blessings God has given him, whether in general to all people or specifically to himself, and offer humble, heartfelt thanks for them. There, he should reveal to God the temptations from the devil, the urges of the flesh, and the influences of the world—and of his worldly friends, who are often more harmful in leading him away from God than even his worst enemies, as our Savior says, "The enemies of a man are those who are his own family." There, he should sincerely lament to God about his own weaknesses, negligence, and laziness in resisting temptation; his tendency to fall into it. There, he should humbly beseech God for His gracious aid and help to strengthen him—both to keep him from falling and, when he by his own fault does stumble, to lift him up with the helping hand of His merciful grace and restore him to His favor. And this man should not doubt that God hears him and gladly grants his requests.
And so, dwelling in the faithful trust of God's help, he shall well use his prosperity, and persevere in his good profitable business, and shall have the truth of God so compass him about with a shield of his heavenly defence that he shall not need to dread of the devil's arrow flying in the day of worldly wealth.
And so, by relying on God's help, he will make good use of his success, continue with his beneficial work, and be surrounded by the truth of God like a shield of divine protection so that he won't have to fear the devil's arrows when he's enjoying worldly wealth.
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, I like this good counsel well. And I should think that those who are in prosperity and take such order therein, may do much good both to themselves and to other folk.
VINCENT: Seriously, uncle, I really like this advice. I believe that those who are doing well and follow this advice can do a lot of good for themselves and others.
ANTHONY: I beseech our Lord, cousin, to put this and better in the mind of every man who needeth it.
ANTHONY: I ask our Lord, cousin, to put this and more in the minds of everyone who needs it.
And now will I touch one word or twain of the third temptation, of which the prophet speaketh in these words: "From the business walking in the darknesses." And then will we call for our dinner, leaving the last temptation—that is, "from the incursion and the devil of the midday"—till afternoon. And then shall we with that, God willing, make an end of all this matter.
And now I’ll mention a word or two about the third temptation, which the prophet refers to with these words: "From the business walking in the darkness." Then we’ll call for our dinner, leaving the final temptation—that is, "from the incursion and the devil of midday"—until afternoon. After that, if God wills, we’ll wrap up all of this.
VINCENT: Our Lord reward you, good uncle, for your good labour with me. But, for our Lord's sake, take good heed, uncle, that you forbear not your dinner over-long.
VINCENT: May our Lord reward you, kind uncle, for all your help with me. But, for the love of our Lord, please make sure you don’t skip dinner for too long.
ANTHONY: Fear not that, cousin, I warrant you, for this piece will I make you but short.
ANTHONY: Don't worry about that, cousin, I assure you, I’ll make this brief.
XVII
The prophet saith in the said psalm, "He that dwelleth in the faithful hope of God's help, he shall abide in the protection or safeguard of God in heaven. And thou who art such a one, the truth of him shall so compass thee about with a shield, that thou shalt not be afraid of the business walking about in the darknesses."
The prophet says in that psalm, "Whoever lives in the confident hope of God's help will be safe under His protection in heaven. And you, who are such a person, His truth will surround you like a shield, so that you won't be afraid of the troubles that roam in the darkness."
"Negotium, the business," is here, cousin, the name of the devil who is ever full of busy-ness in tempting folk to much evil business. His time of tempting is in the darknesses. For you know well that beside the full night, which is the deep dark, there are two times of darkness, the one ere the morning wax light, the other when the evening waxeth dark. Two times of like darkness are there also in the soul of man: the one ere the light of grace be well sprung up in the heart, the other when the light of grace beginneth out of the heart to walk fast away. In these two darknesses this devil who is called Business busily walketh about, and he carrieth about with him such foolish folk as will follow him and setteth them to work with many a manner of bumbling business.
"Negotium, or 'business,' is here, cousin, the name of the devil who is always busy tempting people into bad actions. He does his tempting in the dark. As you know, besides the deep dark of midnight, there are two times of darkness: one before dawn when it's still dim, and the other when evening falls and it gets darker. There are also two similar times of darkness in a person’s soul: one before the light of grace truly takes root in the heart, and the other when that light starts to fade away. During these two dark times, this devil called Business busily wanders around, gathering foolish people who will follow him and setting them to work on all kinds of pointless tasks."
He setteth some, I say, to seek the pleasures of the flesh in eating, drinking, and other filthy delight. And some he setteth about incessant seeking for these worldly goods. And of such busy folk whom this devil called Business, walking about in the darknesses, setteth to work with such business, our Saviour saith in the gospel, "He that walketh in darknesses knoweth not whither he goeth." And surely in such a state are they—they neither know which way they go, nor whither. For verily they walk round about as it were in a round maze; when they think themselves at an end of their business, they are but at the beginning again. For is not the going about the serving of the flesh a business that hath no end, but evermore from the end cometh to the beginning again? Go they never so full-fed to bed, yet evermore on the morrow, as new they are to be fed again as they were the day before. Thus fareth it by the belly; thus fareth it by those parts that are beneath the belly. And as for covetousness, it fareth like the fire—the more wood there cometh to it, the more fervent and the more greedy it is.
He sets some people to seek pleasure through eating, drinking, and other dirty delights. Others he assigns to the constant pursuit of worldly goods. And of these busy individuals, whom this devil called Business sends wandering in the darkness, our Savior says in the gospel, "He who walks in darkness does not know where he is going." And truly, they are in such a state—they neither know the direction they are heading nor their destination. They walk around as if in a maze; when they think they've reached the end of their tasks, they find themselves right back at the beginning. Isn't the pursuit of satisfying the flesh an endless task, perpetually cycling back to the start? Even when they go to bed fully satisfied, they wake up the next day just as hungry as before. This is how it goes for the belly, and similarly for those parts below the belly. As for greed, it operates like fire—the more wood you add, the hotter and hungrier it becomes.
But now hath this maze a centre or middle place, into which these busy folk are sometimes conveyed suddenly when they think they are not yet far from the brink. The centre or middle place of this maze is hell. And into that place are these busy folk who with this devil of business walk about in this busy maze, in the darkness, sometimes suddenly conveyed, unaware whither they are going. And that may be even while they think that they have not walked far from the beginning, and that they have yet a great way to walk about before they should come to the end. But of these fleshly folk walking in this busy pleasant maze the scripture declareth the end: "They lead their life in pleasure, and at a pop down they descend into hell."
But now this maze has a center or middle point, where these busy people are sometimes suddenly taken when they think they’re not far from the edge. The center or middle of this maze is hell. And into that place go these busy people who, with this obsession for business, roam around in this hectic maze, in the darkness, sometimes suddenly taken, unaware of where they’re heading. This can happen even while they believe they haven’t walked far from the start, and that they still have a long way to go before reaching the end. But for these earthly people walking in this busy, enjoyable maze, scripture tells us the outcome: "They live their lives in pleasure, and suddenly they drop down into hell."
Of the covetous man saith St. Paul, "They that long to be rich do fall into temptation and into the snare of the devil, and into many unprofitable and harmful desires, which drown men into death and destruction." Lo, here in the middle place of this busy maze, the snare of the devil, the place of perdition and destruction, in which they fall and are caught and drowned ere they are aware!
Of the greedy person, St. Paul says, "Those who want to be rich fall into temptation and into the trap of the devil, and into many unhelpful and harmful desires, which lead people to death and destruction." Look, here in the midst of this hectic maze, is the devil's trap, the place of ruin and destruction, where they fall, get caught, and are drowned before they even realize it!
The covetous rich man also that our Saviour speaketh of in the gospel, who had so great plenty of corn that his barns would not receive it, but intended to make his barns larger, and said unto himself that he would make merry many days—he thought, you know, that he had a great way yet to walk. But God said unto him, "Fool, this night shall they take thy soul from thee, and then all these goods that thou hast gathered, whose shall they be?" Here, you see, he fell suddenly into the deep centre of this busy maze, so that he was fallen full into it ere ever he had thought he should have come near to it.
The greedy rich man that our Savior talks about in the gospel had so much grain that his barns couldn’t hold it all. He decided to build bigger barns and told himself he would enjoy his wealth for many years. He thought he had plenty of time ahead. But God said to him, "Fool, this very night your life will be taken from you. Then who will get everything you’ve saved up?" As you can see, he suddenly found himself deep in trouble, realizing too late that it could happen to him.
Now this I know very well: Those who are walking about in this busy maze take not their business for any tribulation. And yet are there many of them as sore wearied in it, and sore panged and pained, their pleasures being so short, so little, and so few, and their displeasures and their griefs so great, so continual, and so many. It maketh me think on a good worshipful man who, when he divers times beheld what pain his wife took in tightly binding up her hair to make her a fair large forehead, and with tightly bracing in her body to make her middle small (both twain to her great pain) for the pride of a little foolish praise, he said unto her, "Forsooth, madam, if God give you not hell, he shall do you a great wrong. For it must needs be your own very right, for you buy it very dear and take very great pain therefore!"
Now I know this for sure: the people wandering around in this busy maze don’t think of their struggles as any trouble. Yet many of them are exhausted, suffering, and in pain, with their joys being so brief, so minor, and so few, while their discomfort and sorrow are so immense, so persistent, and so numerous. It reminds me of a respectable man who, seeing how much pain his wife endured in tightly binding her hair to create a nice, large forehead, and how she painfully cinched her waist to make her figure small (both causing her great discomfort) for the sake of a bit of foolish praise, told her, "Truly, my lady, if God doesn't punish you, it would be a great injustice. It’s only right, as you pay dearly for it and suffer greatly in return!"
Those who now lie in hell for their wretched living here do now perceive their folly in the more pain that they took here for the less pleasure. There confess they now their folly, and cry out, "We have been wearied in the way of wickedness." And yet, while they were walking in that way, they would not rest themselves, but ran on still in their weariness, and put themselves still unto more pain and more, for a little childish pleasure, short and soon gone. For that they took all that labour and pain, beside the everlasting pain that followed it for their further advantage afterward. So help me God, but I verily think many a man buyeth hell here with so much pain that he might have bought heaven with less than half!
Those who are now suffering in hell for their miserable lives here are realizing how foolish they were for enduring so much pain for so little pleasure. They now confess their mistakes and cry out, "We have tired ourselves in the path of wickedness." Yet, while they were on that path, they refused to take a break, instead pushing themselves further into exhaustion and subjecting themselves to even more pain, all for a fleeting bit of childish pleasure that was quick to fade. They endured all that struggle and suffering, on top of the eternal torment that followed, thinking it would somehow benefit them later. Honestly, I believe many people choose hell here with so much pain that they could have gained heaven for less than half the effort!
But yet, as I say, while these fleshly and worldly busy folk are walking about in this round busy maze of the devil called Business who walketh about in these two times of darkness, their wits are so bewitched by the secret enchantment of the devil that they mark not the great long miserable weariness and pain that the devil maketh them take and endure about naught. And therefore they take it for no tribulation, so that they need no comfort. And therefore it is not for their sakes that I speak of all this, saving that it may serve them for counsel toward the perceiving of their own foolish misery, through the help of God's grace, beginning to shine upon them again. But there are very good folk and virtuous who are in the daylight of grace, and yet the devil tempteth them busily to such fleshly delight. And since they see plenty of worldly substance fall unto them, and feel the devil in like wise busily tempt them to set their hearts upon it, they are sore troubled therewith. And they begin to fear thereby that they are not with God in the light but with this devil that the prophet calleth Negotium—that is to say, Business—walking about in the two times of darknesses.
But still, as I said, while these busy, worldly people are moving around in this chaotic maze of the devil called Business, their minds are so enchanted by the devil's secret tricks that they don't notice the long, miserable weariness and pain that the devil makes them endure over nothing. So, they don’t see it as a struggle and feel they don’t need any comfort. I bring this up not for their sake, but so they might realize their foolish misery with God's grace starting to shine on them again. However, there are also good and virtuous people who are in the light of grace, yet the devil actively tempts them with fleshly pleasures. Since they see plenty of worldly possessions coming to them and feel the devil pressing them to focus on it, they become deeply troubled. They start to fear that they are not with God in the light but with this devil that the prophet calls Negotium—which means Business—wandering through two times of darkness.
Howbeit, as I said before of those good folk and gracious who are in the worldly wealth of great power and authority and thereby fear the devil's arrow of pride, so say I now here again of these who stand in dread of fleshly foul sin and covetousness: they do well to stand ever in moderate fear, lest with waxing over-bold and setting the thing over-light, they might peradventure mishap to fall in thereto. Yet, since they are but tempted with it and follow it not, to vex and trouble themselves sorely with the fear of loss of God's favour is without necessity and not always without peril. For, as I said before, it withdraweth the mind of a man far from the spiritual consolation of the good hope that he should have in God's help. And as for those temptations, as long as he who is tempted followeth them not, the fight against them serveth him for matter of merit and reward in heaven, if he not only flee the deed, the consent, and the delectation, but also (so far as he conveniently can) flee from all occasions of them.
However, as I mentioned earlier about those good people who have worldly wealth and great power and fear the devil's arrow of pride, I now say the same about those who are afraid of sinful desires and greed: it's wise for them to maintain a healthy fear, so they don’t become overly bold and take things too lightly, which might lead them to fall into sin. Yet, since they are only tempted by these thoughts and don’t act on them, worrying too much about losing God’s favor is unnecessary and can even be dangerous. As I stated before, such worry pulls a person away from the spiritual comfort they should have in God's help. Regarding these temptations, as long as the person who is tempted does not follow through, resisting them actually earns merit and reward in heaven, provided they not only avoid the action, the agreement, and the pleasure but also, as much as possible, steer clear of all opportunities for them.
And this point is in those fleshly temptations a thing easy to perceive and plain enough. But in worldly business pertaining unto covetousness the thing is somewhat more dark and there is more difficulty in the perceiving. And very great troublous fear of it doth often arise in the hearts of very good folk, when the world falleth fast unto them, because of the sore words and terrible threats that God in holy scripture speaketh against those who are rich. As, where St. Paul saith, "They that will be rich fall into temptation, and into the snare of the devil." And where our Saviour saith himself, "It is more easy for a camel"—or, as some say, "for a great cable rope," for "camelus" so signifieth in the Greek tongue—"to go through a needle's eye than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."
And this point is pretty easy to see when it comes to those fleshly temptations. But regarding worldly matters tied to greed, it’s a bit more complicated and harder to understand. This often leads to significant fear in the hearts of very good people when they face the pressures of the world, especially because of the harsh words and serious warnings that God speaks in the holy scriptures against those who are wealthy. For instance, St. Paul says, "Those who want to be rich fall into temptation and the devil's trap." And our Savior himself says, "It’s easier for a camel"—or, as some interpret it, "for a large cable rope," since "camelus" means that in Greek—"to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God."
No marvel, now, if good folk who fear God take occasion of great dread at so dreadful words, when they see the worldly goods fall to them. And some stand in doubt whether it be lawful for them to keep any goods or not. But evermore, in all those places of scripture, the having of the worldly goods is not the thing that is rebuked and threatened, but the affection that the haver unlawfully beareth to them. For where St. Paul saith, "they that will be made rich," he speaketh not of the having but of the will and desire and affection to have, and the longing for it. For that cannot be lightly without sin. For the thing that folk sore long for, they will make many shifts to get and jeopard themselves for.
It's no wonder that good people who fear God feel a deep dread at such terrible words when they see worldly possessions come to them. Some even question whether it’s right for them to keep any of their belongings. But throughout all those scriptures, it’s not the possession of worldly goods that is criticized and warned against, but rather the unhealthy attachment that one holds towards them. When St. Paul says, "those who desire to be rich," he’s not talking about having wealth but about the will, desire, and longing for it. That can easily lead to sin. For what people desperately long for, they will often go to great lengths to obtain, risking everything for it.
And to declare that the having of riches is not forbidden, but the inordinate affection of the mind sore set upon them, the prophet saith, "If riches flow unto you, set not your heart thereupon." And albeit that our Lord, by the said example of the camel or cable rope to come through the needle's eye, said that it is not only hard but also impossible for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven, yet he declared that though the rich man cannot get into heaven of himself, yet God, he said, can get him in well enough. For unto men he said it was impossible, but not unto God, for "unto God," he said, "all things are possible." And yet, beside that, he told of which manner of rich man he meant, who could not get into the kingdom of heaven, saying, "My babes, how hard is it for them that put their trust and confidence in their money, to enter into the kingdom of God!"
And to say that having wealth isn’t wrong, but rather the excessive desire for it is, the prophet says, "If wealth comes to you, don’t set your heart on it." Although our Lord used the example of a camel going through the eye of a needle to illustrate how difficult it is for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven, He also pointed out that, while a rich person cannot do it by themselves, God can help them get in. He stated that it’s impossible for men, but not for God, because "with God, all things are possible." Moreover, He specified what type of rich person He meant, saying, "My little ones, how hard is it for those who trust in their money to enter the kingdom of God!"
VINCENT: This is, I suppose, uncle, very true—and otherwise God forbid! For otherwise the world would be in a full hard state, if every rich man were in such danger and peril.
VINCENT: I guess that's true, uncle—and thank goodness for that! Otherwise, the world would be in a really tough spot if every rich person faced such danger and risk.
ANTHONY: That would it be, cousin, indeed. And so I suppose it is yet. For I fear me that to the multitude there are very few who long not sorely to be rich. And of those who so long to be, there are also very few reserved who set not their heart very sorely thereon.
ANTHONY: That’s true, cousin, indeed. And I suppose it still is. I worry that for most people, very few don’t deeply long to be wealthy. And among those who do desire wealth, there are also very few who don’t have their hearts set on it hard.
VINCENT: This is, uncle, I fear me, very true, but yet not the thing that I was about to speak of. But the thing that I would have said was this: I cannot well perceive (the world being such as it is, and so many poor people in it) how any man can be rich, and keep himself rich, without danger of damnation for it.
VINCENT: Uncle, I think this is very true, but it’s not what I wanted to talk about. What I meant to say is this: I really can’t see how anyone can be wealthy and stay wealthy in a world like this, filled with so many poor people, without risking damnation for it.
For all the while he seeth so many poor people who lack, while he himself hath wherewith to give them. And their necessity he is bound in such case of duty to relieve, while he hath wherewith to do so—so far forth that holy St. Ambrose saith that whosoever die for default, where we might help them, we kill them. I cannot see but that every rich man hath great cause to stand in great fear of damnation, nor can I perceive, as I say, how he can be delivered of that fear as long as he keepeth his riches. And therefore, though he might keep his riches if there lacked poor men and yet stand in God's favour therewith, as Abraham did and many another holy rich man since; yet with such an abundance of poor men as there is now in every country, any man who keepeth any riches must needs have an inordinate affection unto it, since he giveth it not out unto the poor needy persons, as the duty of charity bindeth and constraineth him to.
As he sees so many poor people in need while he has plenty to help them, he is obligated to assist them in such a situation. Holy St. Ambrose said that anyone who dies from lack of aid, when we could have helped, is effectively killed by us. I can't help but think that every wealthy person has a good reason to fear damnation, and I can't see how they can escape that fear as long as they hold onto their riches. Therefore, even though he could keep his wealth if there weren't any poor people and still be in God's favor, like Abraham and many other holy wealthy individuals, with the large number of poor people we have in every country today, anyone who holds onto riches must have an unhealthy attachment to it since they are not giving it to the poor as charity demands and requires.
And thus, uncle, in this world at this day, meseemeth your comfort unto good men who are rich, and are troubled with fear of damnation for the keeping, can very scantly serve.
And so, uncle, in today's world, it seems to me that the comfort you offer to good, wealthy people who are anxious about the possibility of damnation is hardly enough.
ANTHONY: Hard is it, cousin, in many manner of things, to bid or forbid, affirm or deny, reprove or approve, a matter nakedly proposed and put forth; or precisely to say "This thing is good," or "This thing is evil," without consideration of the circumstances.
ANTHONY: It’s tough, cousin, in so many ways, to tell someone to do something or not, to agree or disagree, to criticize or praise, about something that’s clearly presented; or to definitely say "This is good" or "This is bad" without thinking about the circumstances.
Holy St. Austine telleth of a physician who gave a man in a certain disease a medicine that helped him. The selfsame man at another time in the selfsame disease took the selfsame medicine himself, and had of it more harm than good. This he told the physician, and asked him how the harm should have happened. "That medicine," quoth he, "did thee no good but harm because thou tookest it when I gave it thee not." This answer St. Austine very well approveth, because, though the medicine were the same, yet might there be peradventure in the sickness some such difference as the patient perceived not—yea, or in the man himself, or in the place, or in the time of the year. Many things might make the hindrance, for which the physician would not then have given him the selfsame medicine that he gave him before.
Holy St. Augustine tells the story of a doctor who prescribed medicine to a man suffering from a certain illness, and it helped him. The same man later took the same medicine for the same illness but experienced more harm than benefit. He informed the doctor about his experience and asked why this harm had occurred. "That medicine," the doctor replied, "did you no good but harm because you took it when I didn't give it to you." St. Augustine finds this response very insightful because, although the medicine was the same, there might have been differences in the illness that the patient didn't notice—or even in the person himself, the location, or the season of the year. Many factors could have caused the adverse reaction, which is why the doctor wouldn’t have prescribed the same medicine he had given before.
To peruse every circumstance that might, cousin, in this matter be touched, and were to be considered and weighed, would indeed make this part of this devil of Business a very busy piece of work and a long one! But I shall open a little the point that you speak of, and shall show you what I think therein, with as few words as I conveniently can. And then will we go to dinner.
To examine every detail that could be relevant, cousin, in this matter would really make this part of this tricky business quite a hectic and lengthy task! But I will clarify the point you're bringing up and share my thoughts on it, using as few words as possible. Then we can head to dinner.
First, cousin, he who is a rich man and keepeth all his goods, he hath, I think, very good cause to be very afraid indeed. And yet I fear me that such folk fear the least. For they are very far from the state of good men, since, if they keep all, they are then very far from charity, and do, as you know well, either little alms or none at all.
First, cousin, a wealthy man who hoards all his possessions has, I believe, every reason to be quite afraid. And yet, I fear that such people are the least afraid. They are far from being good people; if they hold on to everything, then they are very distant from being charitable and, as you know well, they give very little or even nothing to those in need.
But now our question, cousin, is not in what case that rich man standeth who keepeth all, but whether we should suffer men to stand in a perilous dread and fear for the keeping of any great part. For if, by the keeping of so much as maketh a rich man still, they stand in the state of damnation, then are the curates bound to tell them so plainly, according to the commandment of God given unto them all in the person of Ezechiel: "If, when I say to the wicked man, 'Thou shalt die,' thou do not show it unto him, nor speak unto him that he may be turned from his wicked way and live, he shall soothly die in his wickedness and his blood shall I require of thine hand."
But now our question, cousin, isn’t about the situation of that rich man who has everything, but whether we should allow people to live in constant fear and anxiety over keeping any significant wealth. Because if, by holding on to even a little that makes someone rich, they remain in a state of damnation, then the clergy are obligated to make this very clear to them, as commanded by God through the prophet Ezekiel: "If I say to a wicked person, 'You will die,' and you do not warn them or speak out to them so they can turn from their evil ways and live, they will die in their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood."
But, cousin, though God invited men unto the following of himself in wilful poverty, by the leaving of everything at once for his sake—as the thing by which, being out of solicitude of worldly business and far from the desire of earthly commodities, they may the more speedily get and attain the state of spiritual perfection, and the hungry desire and longing for celestial things—yet doth he not command every man to do so upon the peril of damnation. For where he saith, "He that forsaketh not all that ever he hath, cannot be my disciple," he declareth well, by other words of his own in the selfsame place a little before, what he meaneth. For there saith he more, "He that cometh to me, and hateth not his father, and his mother, and his wife, and his children, and his brethren, and his sisters, yea and his own life too, cannot be my disciple." Here meaneth our Saviour Christ that no one can be his disciple unless he love him so far above all his kin, and above his own life, too, that for the love of him, rather than forsake him, he shall forsake them all. And so meaneth he by those other words that whosoever do not so renounce and forsake all that ever he hath in his own heart and affection, so that he will lose it all and let it go every whit, rather than deadly to displease God with the reserving of any one part of it, he cannot be Christ's disciple. For Christ teacheth us to love God above all things, and he loveth not God above all things who, contrary to God's pleasure, keepeth anything that he hath. For he showeth himself to set more by that thing than by God, since he is better content to lose God than it. But, as I said, to give away all, or that no man should be rich or have substance, that find I no commandment of.
But, cousin, even though God invites people to follow Him in intentional poverty by giving up everything for His sake—so that they can focus less on worldly concerns and desires for earthly possessions, allowing them to quickly reach spiritual perfection and a deep longing for heavenly things—He does not require everyone to do so under the threat of damnation. When He says, "Anyone who doesn’t give up everything they have cannot be my disciple," He clarifies what He means a little earlier in the same passage. He adds, "Anyone who comes to me and does not hate their father, mother, wife, children, brothers, sisters, and even their own life cannot be my disciple." Here, our Savior, Christ, means that no one can truly be His disciple unless they love Him more than their family or even their own life, willing to give them all up rather than abandon Him. This also applies to those who do not wholeheartedly renounce and let go of everything they hold dear, choosing to sacrifice it all instead of displease God by holding onto even a small part of it. Ultimately, He teaches us to love God above all else, and anyone who keeps anything contrary to God's will shows that they value that thing more than God, being more willing to lose God than to part with it. However, as I mentioned, I don't find any command that states everyone should give away everything or that no one should be wealthy or possess anything.
There are, as our Saviour saith, in the house of his father many mansions. And happy shall he be who shall have the grace to dwell even in the lowest. It seemeth verily by the gospel that those who for God's sake patiently suffer penury, shall not only dwell in heaven above those who live here in plenty in earth, but also that heaven in some manner of wise more properly belongeth unto them and is more especially prepared for them than it is for the rich. For God in the gospel counseleth the rich folk to buy (in a manner) heaven of them, where he saith unto the rich men, "Make yourselves friends of the wicked riches, that when you fail here they may receive you into everlasting tabernacles."
There are, as our Savior says, many rooms in his Father’s house. And blessed is the one who has the grace to live even in the simplest. It truly seems from the gospel that those who patiently endure hardships for God’s sake will not only reside in heaven above those who have plenty on earth, but also that heaven is somehow more fittingly theirs and is especially prepared for them than for the wealthy. For God in the gospel advises the rich to "make friends with unrighteous wealth, so that when it fails, they may welcome you into eternal homes."
But now, although this be thus, in respect of the riches and the poverty compared together, yet if a rich man and a poor man be both good men, there may be some other virtue beside in which the rich man may peradventure so excel that he may in heaven be far above that poor man who was here on earth in other virtues far under him. And the proof appeareth clear in Lazarus and Abraham.
But now, even though this is the case regarding wealth and poverty compared to one another, if a rich man and a poor man are both good people, there might be another virtue in which the rich man excels so much that he could be much higher in heaven than the poor man, who might have been greater than him in other virtues on earth. The proof of this is clearly shown in the examples of Lazarus and Abraham.
Nor I say not this to the intent to comfort rich men in heaping up riches, for a little comfort will bend them enough thereto. They are not so proud-hearted and obstinate but what they would, I daresay, with right little exhortation be very conformable to that counsel! But I say this for those good men to whom God giveth substance, and the mind to dispose it well, and yet not the mind to give it all away at once, but for good causes to keep some substance still. Let them not despair of God's favour for not doing the thing which God hath given them no commandment of, nor drawn them to by any special calling.
Nor do I say this to encourage wealthy people to accumulate more riches, as even a little reassurance is enough to sway them in that direction. They aren't so proud or stubborn that, with just a bit of encouragement, they wouldn't readily follow that advice! I'm saying this for those good people to whom God has given resources and the wisdom to use them wisely, but who may not feel called to give everything away at once, instead keeping some resources for worthy causes. They shouldn't lose hope in God's favor for not doing something that God hasn't commanded them to do or called them to specifically.
Zachaeus, lo, who climbed up into the tree, for desire that he had to behold our Saviour: at such a time as Christ called aloud unto him and said, "Zachaeus, make haste and come down, for this day must I dwell in thy house," he was glad and touched inwardly with special grace to the profit of his soul. All the people murmured much that Christ would call him and be so familiar with him as, of his own offer, to come unto his house. For they knew him for the chief of the publicans, who were custom-men or toll-gatherers of the Emperor's duties, all which whole company were among the people sore infamous for ravine, extortion, and bribery. And then Zachaeus not only was the chief of the fellowship but also was grown greatly rich, whereby the people accounted him in their own opinion for a man very sinful and wicked. Yet he forthwith, by the instinct of the spirit of God, in reproach of all such temerarious bold and blind judgment, given upon a man whose inward mind and sudden change they cannot see, shortly proved them all deceived. And he proved that our Lord had, at those few words outwardly spoken to him, so wrought in his heart within that whatsoever he was before, he was then, unawares to them all, suddenly waxed good. For he made haste and came down, and gladly received Christ, and said, "Lo, Lord, the one half of my goods here I give unto poor people. And yet, over that, if I have in anything deceived any man, here am I ready to recompense him fourfold as much."
Zacchaeus, look, who climbed up into the tree because he wanted to see our Savior: at that moment, Christ called out to him and said, “Zacchaeus, hurry and come down, for I must stay at your house today.” He was filled with joy and moved by a special grace that benefited his soul. The crowd murmured a lot because Jesus would call him and be so friendly as to come to his house. They knew Zacchaeus was the chief tax collector, part of a group that collected the Emperor's taxes. This whole group was known for being infamous for robbery, extortion, and bribery. Plus, Zacchaeus wasn’t just the head of the group; he was also very wealthy, which made the people consider him very sinful and wicked. But he quickly, inspired by the spirit of God, challenged their reckless judgments, given against a man whose true heart and sudden transformation they couldn’t see, proving them all wrong. He showed that our Lord, with those few words spoken to him, had changed his heart so that, without anyone realizing, he had suddenly become good. He hurried down, welcomed Christ joyfully, and said, “Look, Lord, I give half of my possessions to the poor. And if I have cheated anyone, I’m ready to repay them four times as much.”
VINCENT: This was, uncle, a gracious hearing. But yet I marvel me somewhat, wherefore Zachaeus used his words in that manner of order. For methinketh he should first have spoken of making restitution unto those whom he had beguiled, and then spoken of giving his alms afterward. For restitution is, you know, duty, and a thing of such necessity that in respect of restitution almsdeed is but voluntary. Therefore it might seem that to put men in mind of their duty in making restitution first, and doing their alms afterward, Zachaeus would have spoken more fittingly if he had said first that he would make every man restitution whom he had wronged, and then give half in alms of that which remained afterward. For only that might he call clearly his own.
VINCENT: Uncle, this was a gracious conversation. But I can’t help but wonder why Zachaeus arranged his words the way he did. I think he should have talked about making restitution to those he wronged before discussing giving alms afterward. Restitution, as you know, is a duty and so essential that in comparison, giving alms is just voluntary. It would seem more appropriate for Zachaeus to remind people of their duty to make restitution first and to give alms afterward. He should have said that he would make restitution to everyone he wronged, and then give half of what was left as alms. Only then could he truly call it his own.
ANTHONY: This is true, cousin, where a man hath not enough to suffice for both. But he who hath, is not bound to leave his alms ungiven to the poor man who is at hand and peradventure calleth upon him, till he go seek up all his creditors and all those whom he hath wronged—who are peradventure so far asunder that, leaving the one good deed undone the while, he may, before they come together, change that good intent again and do neither the one nor the other. It is good always to be doing some good out of hand, while we think on it; grace shall the better stand with us and increase also, to go the further in the other afterward.
ANTHONY: This is true, cousin, when someone doesn’t have enough to take care of both. But if a person has enough, they’re not obligated to wait and give their charity only after seeking out all their creditors and everyone they've wronged—who may be so far away that by the time they connect, the chance to do a good deed will be missed, and they might end up doing neither. It’s always good to do some good right away while we’re thinking about it; that way, we’ll be in a better place to continue doing good in the future.
And this I would answer, if the man had there done the one out of hand—the giving, I mean, of half in alms—and not so much as spoken of restitution till afterward. Whereas now, though he spoke the one in order before the other (and yet all at one time) it remained still in his liberty to put them both in execution, after such order as he should then think expedient. But now, cousin, did the spirit of God temper the tongue of Zachaeus in the utterance of these words in such wise that it may well appear that the saying of the wise man is verified in them, where he saith, "To God it belongeth to govern the tongue." For here, when he said that he would give half of his goods unto poor people and yet beside that not only recompense any man whom he had wronged but more than recompense him by three times as much again, he doubly reproved the false suspicion of the people. For they accounted him for so evil that they reckoned in their mind all his goods wrongly gotten, because he was grown to substance in that office that was commonly misused with extortion. But his words declared that he was deep enough in his reckoning so that, if half his goods were given away, he would yet be well able to yield every man his due with the other half—and yet leave himself no beggar either, for he said not he would give away all.
And this is what I would say if the man had immediately given away half of his possessions—I'm talking about the act of giving alms—and hadn’t mentioned restitution until later. But now, even though he brought up one before the other (and yet simultaneously), he still had the freedom to carry out both actions in whatever order he thought was best. But now, cousin, the Spirit of God guided Zachaeus’s words in such a way that it’s clear the wise saying holds true here: “It’s up to God to control the tongue.” Because when he declared that he would give half of his wealth to the poor and also not just repay anyone he had wronged, but repay them three times over, he strongly challenged the people's mistaken beliefs about him. They thought so poorly of him that they assumed all his wealth was gained through dishonest means, since he had become wealthy in a position that was often abused for extortion. But his words showed that he had thought this through enough to know that, if he gave away half of his wealth, he could still pay everyone what they were owed with the other half—and he wouldn’t be left a beggar either, since he didn’t say he would give away everything.
Would God, cousin, that every rich Christian man who is reputed right worshipful—yea, and (which yet, to my mind, is more) reckoned for right honest, too—would and could do the thing that little Zachaeus, that same great publican, were he Jew or were he paynim, said that he would do: that is, with less than half his goods, to recompense every man whom he had wronged four times as much. Yea, yea, cousin, as much for as much, hardly! And then they who receive it shall be content, I dare promise for them, to let the other thrice-as-much go, and forgive it. Because that was one of the hard points of the old law, whereas Christian men must be full of forgiving, and not require and exact their amends to the uttermost.
I wish, cousin, that every wealthy Christian man, who is considered truly respectable—and, to me, even more importantly, regarded as genuinely honest—would and could do what little Zachaeus, that well-known tax collector, whether he was a Jew or a pagan, said he would do: that is, give back less than half of his wealth to compensate everyone he had wronged four times as much. Yes, yes, cousin, as much for as much, hardly! And I can promise that those who receive it will be happy to let go of the other three times as much and forgive it. Because that was one of the tough aspects of the old law, whereas Christians should be full of forgiveness and not demand their full repayments to the last penny.
But now, for our purpose here: He promised neither to give away all nor to become a beggar—no, nor yet to leave off his office either. For, albeit that he had not used it before peradventure in every point so pure as St. John the Baptist had taught them the lesson: "Do no more than is appointed unto you," yet he might both lawfully use his substance that he intended to reserve, and lawfully might use his office, too, in receiving the prince's duty, according to Christ's express commandment, "Give the Emperor those things that are his," refusing all extortion and bribery besides. Yet our Lord, well approving his good purpose, and exacting no further of him concerning his worldly behaviour, answered and said, "This day is health come to this house, for he too is the son of Abraham."
But now, for our purpose here: He promised not to give everything away or to become a beggar—no, nor to stop his work either. Even though he hadn’t always followed the advice of St. John the Baptist perfectly, which was to "Do no more than is required of you," he could still justifiably keep his resources and appropriately fulfill his role by collecting the prince’s duty, following Christ’s clear command, "Give the Emperor what belongs to him," while rejecting any form of extortion or bribery. Yet our Lord, fully supporting his good intentions and demanding nothing more of him regarding his worldly actions, replied, "Today salvation has come to this house, for he too is a son of Abraham."
But now I forget not, cousin, that in effect you conceded to me thus far: that a man may be rich and yet not out of the state of grace, nor out of God's favour. Howbeit, you think that, though it may be so in some time or in some other place, yet at this time and in this place, or any other such in which there be so many poor people, upon whom you think they are bound to bestow their goods, they can keep no riches with conscience.
But now I won’t forget, cousin, that you have admitted this much to me: that a person can be wealthy and still be in a state of grace and in God’s favor. However, you believe that while this might be true at other times or in other places, right now and here, or in any similar situation with so many poor people, those who have wealth cannot hold onto it with a clear conscience.
Verily, cousin, if that reason would hold, I daresay the world was never such anywhere that any man might have kept any substance without the danger of damnation. For since Christ's days to the world's end, we have the witness of his own word that there hath never lacked poor men nor ever shall. For he said himself, "Poor men shall you always have with you, unto whom, when you will, you may do good." So that, as I tell you, if your rule should hold, then I suppose there would be no place, in no time, since Christ's days hitherto, nor I think in as long before that either, nor never shall there be hereafter, in which any man could abide rich without the danger of eternal damnation, even for his riches alone, though he demeaned himself never so well.
Honestly, cousin, if that reasoning were true, I would say the world has never existed anywhere where someone could have anything without the risk of damnation. Since the days of Christ until the end of the world, we have the confirmation of his own words that there will always be poor people. He said, "You will always have the poor with you, and you can help them whenever you want." So, as I’m telling you, if your rule were to be true, then I believe there would have been no time since Christ's days, or even long before that, and there will never be a time in the future where anyone could remain wealthy without the risk of eternal damnation, even if they acted perfectly well.
But, cousin, men of substance must there be. For otherwise shall you have more beggars, perdy, than there are, and no man left able to relieve another. For this I think in my mind a very sure conclusion: If all the money that is in this country were tomorrow brought together out of every man's hand and laid all upon one heap, and then divided out unto every man alike, it would be on the morrow after worse than it was the day before. For I suppose that when it were all equally thus divided among all, the best would be left little better then than almost a beggar is now. And yet he who was a beggar before, all that he shall be the richer for, that he should thereby receive, shall not make him much above a beggar still. But many a one of the rich men, if their riches stood but in movable substance, shall be safe enough from riches, haply for all their life after!
But, cousin, there have to be men of means. Otherwise, you'll find more beggars than there are now, and no one left who can help another. I firmly believe this: If all the money in this country were gathered together from everyone's hands and piled up, then divided equally among everyone, the next day would be worse than it was the day before. I think that when it’s all shared equally, even the best off would be little better than what a beggar is now. And yet, the former beggar, despite receiving more, would still be hardly above a beggar. But many rich people, if their wealth were only in things that can be moved, might find themselves safe from being truly wealthy for the rest of their lives!
Men cannot, you know, live here in this world unless some one man provide a means of living for many others. Every man cannot have a ship of his own, nor every man be a merchant without a stock. And these things, you know, must needs be had. Nor can every man have a plough by himself. And who could live by the tailor's craft, if no man were able to have a gown made? Who could live by masonry, or who could live a carpenter, if no man were able to build either church or house? Who would be the makers of any manner of cloth, if there lacked men of substance to set sundry sorts to work? Some man who hath not two ducats in his house would do better to lose them both and leave himself not a farthing, but utterly lose all his own, rather than that some rich man by whom he is weekly set to work should lose one half of his money. For then would he himself be likely to lack work. For surely the rich man's substance is the wellspring of the poor man's living. And therefore here would it fare by the poor man as it fared by the woman in one of Æsop's fables. She had a hen that laid her every day a golden egg, till on a day she thought she would have a great many eggs at once. And therefore she killed her hen and found but one or twain in her belly, so that for a few she lost many.
Men can’t survive in this world unless one person provides a way for many others to live. Not everyone can own their own ship, nor can everyone be a merchant without some capital. These things are necessary. Not every person can have a plough to themselves. And who could make a living as a tailor if no one wanted a gown made? Who could work in masonry or carpentry if no one needed to build a church or a house? Who would create any kind of fabric if there weren’t wealthy individuals to hire them for various jobs? A person with less than two ducats in their home would be better off losing both and having nothing rather than risk a rich man, who pays them weekly, losing half of his wealth. Because then that person would likely find themselves without work. After all, the wealth of the rich is the source of the poor's livelihood. This mirrors a tale from one of Æsop's fables about a woman who had a hen that laid a golden egg every day. One day, she thought about getting many eggs at once, so she killed the hen and found only one or two inside, losing many for the sake of a few.
But now, cousin, to come to your doubt how it can be that a man may with conscience keep riches with him, when he seeth so many poor men on whom he may bestow them. Verily, that might he not with conscience do, if he must bestow it upon as many as he can. And so much of truth every rich man do, if all the poor folk that he seeth are so specially by God's commandment committed unto his charge alone that, because our Saviour said, "Give to every man who asketh thee," therefore he is bound to give out still to every beggar who will ask him, as long as any penny lasteth in his purse. But verily, cousin, that saying hath (as St. Austine saith other places in scripture have) need of interpretation. For, as holy St. Austine saith, though Christ say, "Give to every man who asketh thee," he saith not yet, "Give them all that they will ask thee." But surely they would be the same, if he meant to bind me by commandment to give every man without exception something. For so should I leave myself nothing.
But now, cousin, to address your concern about how a person can ethically keep wealth for themselves when they see so many poor people to whom they could give it. Honestly, they could not do that ethically if they were expected to give to as many as possible. And that is the truth for every wealthy person if every poor person they see is specifically under their care by God's command. Just because our Savior said, "Give to everyone who asks you," doesn’t mean they are obligated to give to every beggar who asks, as long as there’s any money left in their pocket. But truly, cousin, that saying requires some interpretation, as St. Augustine suggests about other scriptures. Because while Christ says, "Give to everyone who asks you," he doesn’t say, "Give them everything they ask for." If he meant to obligate me to give something to every single person without exception, then I would end up leaving nothing for myself.
Our Saviour, in that place of the sixth chapter of St. Luke, speaketh both of the contempt that we should have in heart of these worldly things, and also of the manner that men should use toward their enemies. For there he biddeth us love our enemies, give good words for evil, and not only suffer injuries patiently (both the taking away of our goods and harm done unto our body), but also be ready to suffer the double, and over that to do good in return to those who do us the harm. And among these things he biddeth us give to every man who asketh, meaning that when we can conveniently do a man good, we should not refuse it, whatsoever manner of man he may be, though he were our mortal enemy, if we see that unless we help him ourselves, the person of that man should stand in peril of perishing. And therefore saith St. Paul, "If thine enemy be in hunger, give him meat."
Our Savior, in the sixth chapter of St. Luke, talks about how we should view worldly things with contempt in our hearts and also how we should act towards our enemies. He tells us to love our enemies, respond with kindness to those who do wrong to us, and not only endure harm graciously (whether it's losing our possessions or being hurt physically), but also be prepared to suffer even more and do good to those who mistreat us. Additionally, he urges us to give to anyone who asks, meaning that when we can easily help someone, we shouldn't turn them away, no matter who they are, even if they are our personal enemies, especially if we see that they are in danger of suffering without our help. St. Paul also says, "If your enemy is hungry, give him food."
But now, though I be bound to give every manner of man in some manner of his necessity, were he my friend or my foe, Christian man or heathen, yet am I not bound alike unto all men, nor unto any many in every case alike. But, as I began to tell you, the differences of the circumstances make great change in the matter. St. Paul saith, "He that provideth not for those that are his, is worse than an infidel." Those are ours who are belonging to our charge, either by nature or by law, or any commandment of God. By nature, as our children; by law, as our servants in our household. Albeit these two sorts be not ours all alike, yet would I think that the least ours of the twain—that is, the servants—if they need, and lack, we are bound to look to them and provide for their need, and see, so far as we can, that they lack not the things that should serve for their necessity while they dwell in our service. Meseemeth also that if they fall sick in our service, so that they cannot do the service that we retain them for, yet may we not in any wise turn them out of doors and cast them up comfortless, while they are not able to labour and help themselves. For this would be a thing against all humanity. And surely, if a man were but a wayfarer whom I received into my house as a guest, if he fell sick there and his money be gone, I reckon myself bound to keep him still, and rather to beg about for his relief than to cast him out in that condition to the peril of his life, whatsoever loss I should happen to sustain in the keeping of him. For when God hath by such chance sent him to me and there once matched me with him, I reckon myself surely charged with him until I may, without peril of his life, be well and conveniently discharged of him.
But now, although I'm obligated to help everyone in some way, whether they are my friend or enemy, Christian or nonbeliever, I am not equally responsible to all people in every situation. As I started explaining, the differences in circumstances significantly affect the situation. St. Paul says, "Anyone who doesn’t take care of their own is worse than an unbeliever." Those who are ours are those we are responsible for, either by nature, law, or any commandment from God. By nature, we mean our children; by law, we refer to our household servants. Even though these two groups aren’t exactly the same, I believe that the least of the two—our servants—if they are in need, we are obligated to care for them and ensure they have what they need while they are in our service. I also think that if they become ill and can’t fulfill the duties we hired them for, we should never just dismiss them and leave them helpless while they can’t work or take care of themselves. Doing so would be against all human decency. In fact, if a traveler were to seek shelter in my home as a guest and then fell ill, depleting their funds, I consider myself obligated to care for them and would rather gather help for their needs than throw them out in such a state, risking their life, regardless of the losses I might incur by taking them in. When God has brought someone to me in such a way, I feel a responsibility toward them until I can safely and properly help them go on their way without risking their life.
By God's commandment our parents are in our charge, for by nature we are in theirs. Since, as St. Paul saith, it is not the children's part to provide for the parents but the parents' to provide for the children. Provide, I mean, conveniently—good learning or good occupations to get their living by, with truth and the favour of God—but not to make provision for them of such manner of living as they should live the worse toward God for. But rather, if they see by their manner that too much would make them wicked, the father should then give them a great deal less. But although nature put not the parents in the children's charge, yet not only God commandeth but the order of nature compelleth, that the children should both in reverent behaviour honour their father and mother, and also in all their necessity maintain them. And yet, as much as God and nature both bind us to the sustenance of our father, his need may be so little (though it be somewhat) and another man's so great, that both nature and God also would that I should, in such unequal need, relieve that urgent necessity of a stranger—yea, my foe, and God's enemy too, the very Turk or Saracen—before a little need, and unlikely to do great harm, in my father and my mother too. For so ought they both twain themselves to be well content that I should.
By God's command, our parents are our responsibility because, by nature, we are theirs. As St. Paul says, it's not the children's role to take care of their parents, but rather the parents' role to take care of their children. By "provide," I mean in a suitable way—providing good education or suitable jobs for earning a living, along with honesty and God's favor— but not to provide them with a lifestyle that pushes them away from God. Instead, if they notice that giving them too much could lead to wickedness, a father should then give them much less. While nature doesn’t place parents under the care of their children, both God and the natural order demand that children honor their father and mother with respectful behavior and support them in all their needs. Yet, as much as both God and nature require us to support our fathers, his needs may be minor (even if they exist), whereas someone else's may be severe. In such unequal situations, both nature and God would have me prioritize helping a stranger in urgent need—even if that person is my enemy or even an enemy of God, like a Turk or a Saracen—over the minor needs of my own father and mother. They both should be content with that approach.
But now, cousin, outside of such extreme need well perceived and known unto myself, I am not bound to give to every beggar who will ask; nor to believe every imposter that I meet in the street who will say himself that he is very sick; nor to reckon all the poor folk committed by God only so to my charge alone, that no other man should give them anything of his until I have first given out all mine. Nor am I bound either to have so evil opinion of all other folk save myself as to think that, unless I help, the poor folk shall all fail at once, for God hath left in all this quarter no more good folk now but me! I may think better of my neighbours and worse of myself than that, and yet come to heaven, by God's grace, well enough.
But now, cousin, aside from those times of real need that I clearly understand, I’m not obligated to give to every beggar who asks; nor should I believe every imposter I encounter on the street who claims to be very sick; nor should I assume that all the poor are solely my responsibility, meaning no one else should help them until I’ve given everything I have. I'm also not required to think so poorly of everyone else except myself to believe that, unless I step in, all the poor will suffer right away, as if God has left no good people in this area except for me! I can have a better opinion of my neighbors and a worse opinion of myself than that, and still make it to heaven, by God's grace, just fine.
VINCENT: Marry, uncle, but some man will peradventure be right content, in such cases, to think his neighbours very charitable, to the intent that he may think himself at liberty to give nothing at all.
VINCENT: Well, uncle, some guy might actually be happy to think that his neighbors are very generous, so he can feel free to give nothing at all.
ANTHONY: That is, cousin, very true. Some will be content either to think so, or to make as though they thought so. But those are they who are content to give naught because they are naught! But our question is, cousin, not of them, but of good folk who, by the keeping of worldly goods, stand in great fear to offend God. For the quieting of their conscience speak we now, to the intent that they may perceive what manner of having of worldly goods, and keeping of them, may stand with the state of grace.
ANTHONY: That’s very true, cousin. Some people are fine either believing that or pretending they do. But those are the ones who are okay with giving nothing because they have nothing! Our focus, cousin, isn’t on them, but on good people who, by holding onto worldly possessions, are very worried about offending God. We’re speaking now to ease their conscience, so they can understand how to have and manage worldly goods while still being in a state of grace.
Now think I, cousin, that if a man keep riches about him for a glory and royalty of the world, taking a great delight in the consideration of it and liking himself for it, and taking him who is poorer for the lack of it as one far worse than himself, such a mind is very vain foolish pride and such a man is very wicked indeed. But on the other hand, there may be a man—such as would God there were many!—who hath no love unto riches, but having it fall abundantly unto him, taketh for his own part no great pleasure of it, but, as though he had it not, keepeth himself in like abstinence and penance privily as he would do in case he had it not. And, in such things as he doth openly, he may bestow somewhat more liberally upon himself in his house after some manner of the world, lest he should give other folk occasion to marvel and muse and talk of his manner and misreport him for a hypocrite. And therein, between God and him, he may truly protest and testify, as did the good queen Hester, that he doth it not for any desire thereof in the satisfying of his own pleasure, but would with as good will or better forbear the possession of riches, saving them—as perhaps in keeping a good household in good Christian order and fashion, and in setting other folk to work with such things as they gain their living the better by his means. If there be such a man, his having of riches methinketh I might in a manner match in merit with another man's forsaking of all. Or so would it be if there were no other circumstances more pleasing unto God added further unto the forsaking besides, as perhaps for the more fervent contemplation by reason of the solicitude of all worldly business being left off, which was the thing that made Mary Magdalene's part the better. For otherwise would Christ have given her much more thanks to go about and be busy in the helping her sister Martha to dress his dinner, than to take her stool and sit down at her ease and do naught.
Now, think about it, cousin. If a man flaunts his wealth for the sake of appearance and enjoys the sight of it, looking down on those who are poorer and seeing them as inferior, that mindset is just vain and foolish pride, and such a man is truly wicked. On the flip side, there might be a man—one can only hope there are many!—who doesn’t care for riches but finds that they come to him abundantly. He doesn’t take great pleasure in them but, as if he didn’t have them, keeps himself in a humble and austere manner, just as he would if he were poor. In public, he might spend a little more on himself at home to avoid raising eyebrows or sparking gossip about his behavior and risk being called a hypocrite. In this way, between him and God, he can honestly say, like the good Queen Esther, that he doesn’t do it for his own enjoyment but would gladly give up his wealth if it weren’t necessary for maintaining a good Christian household and helping others earn a living through his means. If such a man exists, I believe his possession of riches could be seen as almost equal in merit to another person’s complete renunciation of wealth. That might hold true unless there are additional circumstances that please God more about the forsaking, like a deeper focus on prayer and contemplation due to abandoning all worldly concerns, which is what made Mary Magdalene’s choice better. Otherwise, Christ would have given her more thanks for helping her sister Martha prepare dinner than for sitting down and doing nothing.
Now, if he who hath these goods and riches by him, have not haply fully so perfect a mind, but somewhat loveth to keep himself from lack; and if he be not, so fully as a pure Christian fashion requireth, determined to abandon his pleasure—well, what will you more? The man is so much the less perfect than I would that he were, and haply than he himself would wish, if it were as easy to be it as to wish it. But yet is he not forthwith in the state of damnation, for all that. No more than every man is forthwith in a state of damnation who, forsaking all and entering into religion, is not yet always so clear purified from worldly affections as he himself would very fain that he were, and much bewaileth that he is not. Many a man, who hath in the world willingly forsaken the likelihood of right worshipful offices, hath afterward had much ado to keep himself from the desire of the office of cellarer or sexton, to bear yet at least some rule and authority, though it were but among the bellies. But God is more merciful to man's imperfection—if the man know it, and acknowledge it, and mislike it, and little by little labour to amend it—than to reject and cast off to the devil him who, according as his frailty can bear and suffer, hath a general intent and purpose to please him and to prefer or set by nothing in this world before him.
Now, if someone has these goods and riches but doesn’t quite have a perfect mind, and somewhat wants to keep himself from lacking, and if he isn't as committed to giving up his pleasures as a true Christian should be—well, what more can you say? He's definitely less perfect than I would like him to be, and probably less perfect than he wishes he were, if it were as easy to be that way as to wish for it. But he’s not immediately damned because of that. Just as not every person who leaves everything behind to join a religious life is instantly damned if he isn't completely free from worldly desires, even though he really wishes he were. Many men who have voluntarily given up the possibility of respectable positions in the world later struggle with the desire for roles like cellarer or sexton, just to have some authority, even if it’s over something as trivial as the church’s bell. But God is more merciful towards human imperfection—if a person recognizes, admits, and dislikes his flaws, and gradually works to improve them—than to reject someone who, within the limits of his frailty, genuinely intends to please Him and values nothing in this world above Him.
And therefore, cousin, to make an end of this piece withal—of this devil, I mean, whom the prophet calleth "Business walking in the darknesses": If a man have a mind to serve God and please him, and would rather lose all the goods he hath than wittingly to do deadly sin; and if he would, without murmur or grudge, give it every whit away in case God should so command him, and intend to take it patiently if God would take it from him; and if he would be glad to use it unto God's pleasure, and do his diligence to know and be taught what manner of using of it God would be pleased with; and if he be glad to follow therein, from time to time, the counsel of good virtuous men, though he neither give away all at once, nor give to every man who asketh him neither; and though every man should fear and think in this world that all the good that he doth or can do is a great deal too little—yet, for all that fear, let that man dwell in the faithful hope of God's help! And then shall the truth of God so compass him about, as the prophet saith, with a shield, that he shall not so need to dread the snares and the temptations of this devil whom the prophet calleth "Business walking about in the darknesses." But he shall, for all the having of riches and worldly substance, so avoid his snares and temptations, that he shall in conclusion, by the great grace and almighty mercy of God, get into heaven well enough.
And so, cousin, to wrap this up—about this evil, I mean, whom the prophet calls "Business walking in the darkness": If someone wants to serve God and make Him happy, and would rather lose everything they have than intentionally commit a serious sin; and if they would willingly give it all away if God asked them to, and accept it patiently if God took it from them; and if they would be happy to use it for God's purposes, and make an effort to learn how to use it in a way that would please God; and if they are eager to follow, as much as they can, the advice of good and virtuous people—even if they don't give it all away at once, or give to everyone who asks; and even if many people feel that all the good they do is never enough—despite that fear, let that person live in the faithful hope of God's support! Then the truth of God will surround them, as the prophet says, like a protective shield, so they won’t need to fear the traps and temptations of this evil whom the prophet calls "Business walking in the darkness." But despite having wealth and worldly goods, they will avoid those traps and temptations sufficiently that, by God's great grace and all-powerful mercy, they will ultimately reach heaven just fine.
And now was I, cousin, after this piece thus ended, about to bid them bring in our dinner. But now shall I not need to, lo, for here they come with it already.
And now here I am, cousin, after this part is done, getting ready to ask them to bring in our dinner. But I don’t need to anymore, look, here they come with it already.
VINCENT: Forsooth, good uncle, God disposeth and timeth your matter and your dinner both, I trust. For the end of your good tale—for which our Lord reward you!—and the beginning here of your good dinner too (from which it would be more than pity that you should any longer have tarried) meet even at the close together.
VINCENT: Truly, good uncle, I believe God is taking care of both your business and your dinner. The conclusion of your great story—may our Lord reward you for it!—and the start of your delicious dinner (which would be a shame to delay any longer) are coming together right now.
ANTHONY: Well, cousin, now will we say grace. And then for a while will we leave talking and essay how our dinner shall please us, and how fair we can fall to feeding. After that, you know my customary guise (for "manner" I cannot call it, because the guise is unmannerly) to bid you not farewell but steal away from you to sleep. But you know I am not wont to sleep long in the afternoon, but even a little to forget the world. And when I wake, I will again come to you. And then is, God willing, all this long day ours, in which we shall have time enough to talk much more than shall suffice for the finishing of this one part of our matter that now alone remaineth.
ANTHONY: Well, cousin, let’s say grace now. Then, for a while, we’ll stop talking and focus on how our dinner will satisfy us and how well we can dig in. After that, you know my usual routine (I wouldn't call it a "manner" because it’s not very polite) is to not say goodbye but to sneak away to sleep. But you know I usually don’t nap for long in the afternoon, just enough to escape from the world for a bit. When I wake up, I’ll come back to you. And then, God willing, we’ll have the whole day ahead of us, giving us plenty of time to discuss much more than what we need to finish this part of our conversation that’s left.
VINCENT: I pray you, good uncle, keep your customary manner, for "manner" may you call it well enough. For as it would be against good manners to look that a man should kneel down for courtesy when his knee is sore, so is it very good manners that a man of your age (aggrieved with such sundry sicknesses besides, that suffer you not always to sleep when you should) should not let his sleep slip away but should take it when he can. And I will, uncle, in the meanwhile steal from you, too, and speed a little errand and return to you again.
VINCENT: Please, dear uncle, stick to your usual ways, as "ways" is a fitting term. Just as it would be rude to expect a man to kneel out of courtesy if his knee is hurting, it's also very appropriate for a man of your age—who has to deal with various health issues that sometimes keep you from sleeping when you need to—not to let sleep slip away but to take it when you can. And I will, uncle, in the meantime, slip away for a bit to run a quick errand and will return to you shortly.
ANTHONY: Stay as long as you will, and when you have dined go at your pleasure. But I pray you, tarry not long.
ANTHONY: Stay as long as you want, and when you've finished eating, leave whenever you like. But please, don’t take too long.
VINCENT: You shall not need, uncle, to put me in mind of that, I would so fain have up the rest of our matter.
VINCENT: You don't need to remind me of that, uncle; I really want to get to the rest of our discussion.
______________________________
The text is missing. Please provide a short phrase for modernization.
BOOK THREE
VINCENT: I have tarried somewhat the longer, uncle, partly because I was loth to come over-soon, lest my soon-coming might have happed to have made you wake too soon. But I tarried especially for the reason that I was delayed by someone who showed me a letter, dated at Constantinople, by which it appeareth that the great Turk prepareth a marvellous mighty army. And yet whither he will go with it, that can there yet no man tell. But I fear in good faith, uncle, that his voyage shall be hither. Howbeit, he who wrote the letter saith that it is secretly said in Constantinople that a great part of his army shall be shipped and sent either into Naples or into Sicily.
VINCENT: I've stayed a bit longer, uncle, partly because I didn't want to arrive too soon and wake you up too early. But mostly, I waited because someone showed me a letter dated from Constantinople, which says that the great Turk is preparing a massive army. However, no one knows where he plans to send it. Still, I genuinely fear, uncle, that his destination will be here. The person who wrote the letter mentioned that there are rumors in Constantinople that a large part of his army will be shipped off to either Naples or Sicily.
ANTHONY: It may fortune, cousin, that the letter of a Venetian, dated at Constantinople, was devised at Venice. From thence come there some letters—and sometimes from Rome, too, and sometimes also from some other places—all stuffed full of such tidings that the Turk is ready to do some great exploit. These tidings they blow about for the furtherance of some such affairs as they have themselves then in hand.
ANTHONY: It could be that, cousin, the letter from a Venetian, dated in Constantinople, was actually written in Venice. Some letters come from there—and sometimes from Rome too, and from other places as well—all filled with news that the Turk is about to take some big action. They spread these stories to push their own agendas.
The Turk hath also so many men of arms in his retinue at his continual charge that, lest they should lie still and do nothing, but peradventure fall in devising of some novelties among themselves, he is fain yearly to make some assembly and some changing of them from one place unto another, and part some asunder, that they wax not over-well acquainted by dwelling over-long together. By these ways also, he maketh those that he intendeth suddenly to invade indeed, to look the less for it, and thereby to make the less preparation before. For they see him so many times make a great visage of war when he intendeth it not, but then, at one time or another, they suddenly feel it when they fear it not.
The Turk also keeps so many armed men in his entourage at his ongoing expense that, to prevent them from becoming idle and possibly coming up with new ideas among themselves, he feels the need to hold an assembly and rotate them yearly from one location to another, even separating some of them so they don't get too comfortable by spending too much time together. Through these methods, he also makes those he plans to invade unexpectedly pay less attention, allowing them to be less prepared ahead of time. They often see him display a show of force when he doesn’t actually intend to go to war, but then, when they least expect it, he strikes suddenly.
Howbeit, cousin, it is of very truth full likely that into this realm of Hungary he will not fail to come. For neither is there any country throughout Christendom that lieth so convenient for him, nor never was there any time till now in which he might so well and surely win it. For now we call him in ourselves, God save us, as Æsop telleth that the sheep took in the wolf among them to keep them from the dogs.
However, cousin, it’s very likely that he will indeed come to this realm of Hungary. There’s no other country in Christendom that is as convenient for him, nor has there ever been a time until now when he could win it so easily and surely. Now we find ourselves, God save us, like the sheep in Æsop's fable who took in the wolf among them to protect themselves from the dogs.
VINCENT: Then are there, good uncle, all those tribulations very like to fall upon us here, that I spoke of in the beginning of our first communication here the other day.
VINCENT: So, good uncle, are all those troubles I mentioned at the beginning of our conversation the other day really likely to happen to us here?
ANTHONY: Very truth it is, cousin, that so there will of likelihood in a while, but not forthwith all at first. For since he cometh under the colour of aid for the one against the other, he will somewhat see the proof before he fully show himself. But in conclusion, if he be able to get it for that one, you shall see him so handle it that he shall not fail to get it from him, and that forthwith out of hand, ere ever he suffer him to settle himself over-sure therein.
ANTHONY: It's true, cousin, that it's likely to happen soon, but not right away. Since he’s coming in the guise of helping one side against the other, he’ll want to assess the situation a bit before revealing his full intentions. But in the end, if he can secure it for that person, you’ll see him manage it in a way that guarantees he will get it from him immediately, before he even has a chance to feel overly confident about it.
VINCENT: Yet say they, uncle, that he useth not to force any man to forsake his faith.
VINCENT: But they say, uncle, that he doesn't force anyone to give up their faith.
ANTHONY: Not any man, cousin? They say more than they can make good, those who tell you so. He maketh a solemn oath, among the ceremonies of that feast in which he first taketh upon him his authority, that he will diminish the faith of Christ, in all that he possibly can, and dilate the faith of Mahomet. But yet hath he not used to force every whole country at once to forsake their faith. For of some countries hath he been content only to take a tribute yearly and let them then live as they will. Out of some he taketh the whole people away, dispersing them for slaves among many sundry countries of his, very far from their own, without any sufferance of regress. In some countries, so great and populous that they cannot well be carried and conveyed thence, he destroyeth the gentlefolk and giveth the lands partly to such as he bringeth and partly to such as willingly will deny their faith, and keepeth the others in such misery that they might as well (in a manner) be dead at once. In rest he suffereth else no Christian man almost, but those that resort as merchants or those that offer themselves to serve him in his war.
ANTHONY: Not any man, cousin? People often say more than they can back up. He makes a serious oath during the ceremonies of the feast when he first takes on his authority, vowing that he will undermine the faith of Christ as much as he can and promote the faith of Muhammad. However, he hasn’t usually forced entire countries to abandon their faith all at once. In some places, he’s been content just to take a yearly tribute and let them live as they choose. In other places, he takes the entire population away, scattering them as slaves across his many distant lands, without any hope of returning. In some regions that are too large and populous to move everyone, he kills the noble class and gives the land partly to those he brings in and partly to those who willingly renounce their faith, keeping the others in such misery that they might as well be dead. Elsewhere, he allows very few Christians to remain, mostly those who come as merchants or those who volunteer to serve him in his wars.
But as for those Christian countries that he useth not only for tributaries, as he doth Chios, Cyprus, or Crete, but reckoneth for clear conquest and utterly taketh for his own, as Morea, Greece, and Macedonia, and such others—and as I verily think he will Hungary, if he get it—in all those he useth Christian people after sundry fashions. He letteth them dwell there, indeed, because they would be too many to carry all away, and too many to kill them all, too, unless he should either leave the land dispeopled and desolate or else, from some other countries of his own, should convey the people thither (which would not be well done) to people that land with. There, lo, those who will not be turned from their faith, of which God—lauded be his holy name!—keepeth very many, he suffereth to dwell still in peace. But yet is their peace for all that not very peaceable. For he suffereth them to have no lands of their own, honourable offices they bear none; with occasions of his wars, he plucketh them unto the bare bones with taxes and tallages. Their children he chooseth where he will in their youth, and taketh them from their parents, conveying them whither he will, where their friends never see them after, and abuseth them as he will. Some young maidens he maketh harlots, some young men he bringeth up in war, and some young children he causeth to be gelded—not their stones cut out as the custom was of old, but their whole members cut off by the body; how few escape and live he little careth, for he will have enough! And all whom he so taketh young, to any use of his own, are betaken unto such Turks or false renegades to keep, that they are turned from the faith of Christ every one. Or else they are so handled that, as for this world, they come to an evil end. For, besides many other contumelies and despites that the Turks and the false renegade Christians many times do to good Christian people who still persevere and abide by the faith, they find the means sometimes to make some false knaves say that they heard such-and-such a Christian man speak opprobrious words against Mahomet. And upon that point, falsely testified, they will take occasion to compel him to forsake the faith of Christ and turn to the profession of their shameful superstitious sect, or else will they put him to death with cruel intolerable torments.
But for those Christian countries that he uses not just as tributaries, like Chios, Cyprus, or Crete, but claims outright as his own, such as Morea, Greece, and Macedonia—and I genuinely believe he will go after Hungary if he can—he treats the Christian people in various ways. He allows them to live there because it would be impractical to take all of them away or to kill them all; he would either end up leaving the land empty and desolate or have to bring in people from his other territories to populate it, which would not be a good idea. So, those who won't abandon their faith, whom God—blessed be His holy name!—keeps in large numbers, he lets live in relative peace. However, their peace isn't really peaceful. They have no lands of their own, hold no honorable positions, and he strips them bare with taxes and tributes due to his wars. He takes their children whenever he wants, separating them from their parents and sending them away so their friends never see them again, treating them as he pleases. He turns some young women into prostitutes, some young men into soldiers, and some young children are castrated—not just their stones cut off as was the old custom, but their entire members removed. He hardly cares how few survive, as he will always have enough! All the young people he captures for his own purposes are given to Turks or false renegades to raise, and they all end up abandoning the Christian faith. Otherwise, they are treated so poorly that they come to a terrible fate in this world. In addition to various other insults and wrongs that the Turks and false renegade Christians often inflict on faithful Christians, they sometimes find a way to make false accusations, claiming that a certain Christian man spoke disrespectfully about Muhammad. On that basis, falsely testified, they will seize the opportunity to force him to renounce the Christian faith and adopt their shameful superstitious beliefs, or they will execute him with cruel and unbearable tortures.
VINCENT: Our Lord, uncle, for his mighty mercy, keep those wretches hence! For, by my troth, if they hap to come hither, methinketh I see many more tokens than one that we shall have some of our own folk here ready to fall in with them.
VINCENT: Our Lord, uncle, for his great mercy, keep those wretches away! For, honestly, if they happen to come here, I think I see many signs that suggest some of our own people will be ready to join them.
For as before a great storm the sea beginneth sometimes to work and roar in itself, ere ever the winds wax boisterous, so methinketh I hear at mine ear some of our own here among us, who within these few years could no more have borne the name of Turk than the name of devil, begin now to find little fault in them—yea, and some to praise them little by little, as they can, more glad to find faults at every state of Christendom: priests, princes, rites, ceremonies, sacraments, laws, and customs spiritual, temporal, and all.
For just like before a big storm, the sea sometimes starts to stir and roar on its own before the winds really pick up, it seems to me I hear some of our people here among us, who just a few years ago could never have tolerated the name Turk, now starting to find small faults with them—yes, and some even beginning to praise them bit by bit, as they can, more eager to point out flaws in every part of Christendom: priests, princes, rites, ceremonies, sacraments, laws, and customs, both spiritual and temporal.
ANTHONY: In good faith, cousin, so begin we to fare here indeed, and that but even now of late. For since the title of the crown hath come in question, the good rule of this realm hath very sore decayed, as little a while as it is. And undoubtedly Hungary shall never do well as long as men's minds hearken after novelty and have their hearts hanging upon a change. And much the worse I like it, when their words walk so large toward the favour of the Turk's sect, which they were ever wont to have in so great abomination, as every true-minded Christian man—and Christian woman, too—must have.
ANTHONY: Honestly, cousin, we’re really starting to feel the impact of things here, especially recently. Ever since the crown's legitimacy has been questioned, the effective governance of this realm has seriously suffered in such a short time. And without a doubt, Hungary will never prosper as long as people are chasing after new trends and holding onto the hope for change. It bothers me even more when their words show such obvious favor toward the Turks, whom they’ve always held in such disdain, as every true Christian—both men and women—should.
I am of such age as you see, and verily from as far as I can remember, it hath been marked and often proved true, that when children in Buda have fallen in a fancy by themselves to draw together and in their playing make as it were corpses carried to church, and sing after their childish fashion the tune of the dirge, great death hath followed shortly thereafter. And twice or thrice I can remember in my day when children in divers parts of this realm have gathered themselves in sundry companies and made as it were troops and battles. And after their battles in sport, in which some children have yet taken great hurt, there hath fallen true battle and deadly war indeed. These tokens were somewhat like your example of the sea, since they are tokens going before, of things that afterward follow, through some secret motion or instinct of which the cause is unknown.
I am of the age you see, and from what I can remember, it's been noted and often proven true that when children in Buda decide to play together and pretend to carry corpses to church, singing a version of a funeral song, great death soon follows. I can recall a couple of times when kids across this realm gathered in different groups and staged troops and battles. After their playful battles, in which some kids even got really hurt, real fights and deadly wars broke out. These signs were somewhat similar to your example of the sea, as they precede events that follow, driven by some unknown instinct or cause.
But, by St. Mary, cousin, these tokens like I much worse—these tokens, I say, not of children's play nor of children's songs, but old knaves' large open words, so boldly spoken in the favour of Mahomet's sect in this realm of Hungary, which hath been ever hitherto a very sure key of Christendom. And without doubt if Hungary be lost and the Turk have it once fast in his possession, he shall, ere it be long afterward, have an open ready way into almost all the rest of Christendom. Though he win it not all in a week, the great part will be won, I fear me, within very few years after.
But, by St. Mary, cousin, these signs worry me much more—these signs, I say, not of children’s play nor of children’s songs, but of old tricksters’ large open words, so boldly spoken in support of Mahomet's sect in this realm of Hungary, which has always been a very secure key to Christendom. And without a doubt, if Hungary is lost and the Turk gets it firmly in his possession, he shall, before long, have an open and easy way into almost all the rest of Christendom. Even if he doesn’t conquer it all in a week, a huge part will be won, I fear, within just a few years after.
VINCENT: But yet evermore I trust in Christ, good uncle, that he shall not suffer that abominable sect of his mortal enemies in such wise to prevail against his Christian countries.
VINCENT: But I still trust in Christ, dear uncle, that he won't allow that despicable sect of his mortal enemies to triumph over his Christian nations.
ANTHONY: That is very well said, cousin. Let us have our sure hope in him, and then shall we be very sure that we shall not be deceived. For we shall have either the thing that we hope for, or a better thing in its stead. For, as for the thing itself that we pray for and hope to have, God will not always send it to us. And therefore, as I said in our first communication, in all things save only for heaven, our prayer and our hope may never be too precise, although the thing may be lawful to ask.
ANTHONY: That's very well said, cousin. Let's put our hope in him, and then we can be sure we won't be misled. We'll either get what we hope for or something even better instead. As for what we pray for and hope to receive, God doesn't always give us that. So, as I mentioned in our first conversation, in everything except for heaven, our prayers and hopes can never be too specific, even if what we’re asking for is perfectly okay.
Verily, if we people of the Christian nations were such as would God we were, I would little fear all the preparations that the great Turk could make. No, nor yet, being as bad as we are, I doubt not at all but that in conclusion, however base Christendom be brought, it shall spring up again, till the time be come very near to the day of judgment, some tokens of which methinketh are not come yet. But somewhat before that time shall Christendom be straitened sore, and brought into so narrow a compass that, according to Christ's words, "When the Son of Man shall come again"—that is, to the day of general judgment—"thinkest thou that he shall find faith in the earth?" as who should say, "but a little." For, as appeareth in the Apocalypse and other places of scripture, the faith shall be at that time so far faded that he shall, for the love of his elect, lest they should fall and perish too, abridge those days and accelerate his coming. But, as I say, methinketh I miss yet in my mind some of those tokens that shall, by the scripture, come a good while before that. And among others, the coming in of the Jews and the dilating of Christendom again before the world come to that strait. So I say that for mine own mind I have little doubt that this ungracious sect of Mahomet shall have a foul fall, and Christendom spring and spread, flower and increase again. Howbeit, the pleasure and comfort shall they see who shall be born after we are buried, I fear me, both twain. For God giveth us great likelihood that for our sinful wretched living he goeth about to make these infidels, who are his open professed enemies, the sorrowful scourge of correction over evil Christian people who should be faithful and who are of truth his falsely professing friends.
If the people of Christian nations were really as we should be, I wouldn’t worry at all about the great Turk’s preparations. And even being as flawed as we are, I have no doubt that, despite how low Christendom may sink, it will rise again until the time is very close to the day of judgment, some signs of which I believe have not yet appeared. But sometime before then, Christendom will be severely constrained and shrunk down so much that, as Christ said, "When the Son of Man returns"—referring to the day of judgment—"do you think he will find faith on the earth?" implying that it will be very scarce. For, as is evident in Revelation and other scripture, faith will have faded so much by then that, for the sake of his chosen ones, to prevent them from falling and perishing as well, he will shorten those days and hasten his return. However, I feel I’m still missing some of the signs that, according to scripture, should come well before that time. Among other things, the return of the Jews and the resurgence of Christendom before the world reaches that crisis. So, in my view, I have little doubt that this unholy sect of Muhammad will face a terrible downfall, and Christendom will rise and thrive again. However, the joy and comfort will belong to those born after we are gone, I fear, both groups. For God gives us a strong indication that due to our sinful and miserable lives, he is preparing to use these infidels, who are his openly declared enemies, as the painful means of correction for unfaithful Christians who should be true and are in fact just pretending to be his friends.
And surely, cousin, albeit that methinketh I see divers evil tokens of this misery coming to us, yet can there not, to my mind, be a worse prognostication of it than this ungracious token that you note here yourself. For undoubtedly, cousin, this new manner of men's favourable fashion in their language toward these ungracious Turks declareth plainly not only that their minds give them that hither shall he come, but also that they can be content both to live under him and, beside that, to fall from the true faith of Christ into Mahomet's false abominable sect.
And surely, cousin, even though I think I see various signs of this misfortune approaching us, I don’t believe there could be a worse omen than this disrespectful sign that you mention here yourself. Undoubtedly, cousin, this new trend of people being friendly in their language towards these wicked Turks clearly shows not only that they believe he will come here but also that they are okay with living under him and, on top of that, abandoning the true faith of Christ for Mahomet’s disgusting false belief.
VINCENT: Verily, mine uncle, as I go about more than you, so must I needs hear more (which is a heavy hearing in mine ear) the manner of men in this matter, which increaseth about us here—I trust that in other places of this realm, by God's grace, it is otherwise. But in this quarter here about us, many of these fellows who are fit for the war were wont at first, as it were in sport, to talk as though they looked for a day when, with a turn to the Turk's faith, they should be made masters here of true Christian men's bodies and owners of all their goods. And, in a while after that, they began to talk so half between game and earnest—and now, by our Lady, not far from fair flat earnest indeed.
VINCENT: Honestly, my uncle, since I get around more than you do, I have to hear more (which is tough to hear) about how men are behaving regarding this issue, which is growing around us here—I hope that in other parts of this kingdom, by God's grace, it's different. But here in our area, many of these guys who are ready for a fight used to joke about a day when, by turning to the Turk's faith, they'd take control of true Christian men's lives and claim all their possessions. Then, they started talking about it half-jokingly and half-seriously—and now, I swear, it's getting really serious.
ANTHONY: Though I go out but little, cousin, yet hear I sometimes—when I say little!—almost as much as that. But since there is no man to whom we can complain for redress, what remedy is there but patience, and to sit still and hold our peace? For of these two who strive which of them both shall reign over us—and each of them calleth himself king, and both twain put the people to pain—one is, as you know well, too far from our quarter here to help us in this behalf. And the other, since he looketh for the Turk's aid, either will not, or (I suppose) dare not find any fault with them that favour the Turk and his sect. For of natural Turks this country lacketh none now; they are living here under divers pretexts, and of everything they advertise the great Turk full surely. And therefore, cousin, albeit that I would advise every man to pray still and call unto God to hold his gracious hand over us and keep away this wretchedness if his pleasure be, yet would I further advise every good Christian body to remember and consider that it is very likely to come. And therefore I would advise him to make his reckoning and count his pennyworths before, and I would advise every man (and every woman, too) to appoint with God's help in their own mind beforehand what they intend to do if the very worst should befall.
ANTHONY: Although I don’t go out much, cousin, I still hear things—when I say “little,” it’s almost as much as that. But since there’s no one we can turn to for help, what else can we do but be patient and stay quiet? Because with these two who are fighting over who will rule us—each of them calling themselves king and both causing pain to the people—one is, as you know, too far away to help us. And the other, since he’s looking for the Turk’s support, either won’t or probably can’t criticize those who back the Turk and his followers. This country has no shortage of natural Turks anymore; they are here under various pretenses, and they reliably inform the great Turk about everything. So, cousin, even though I would advise everyone to keep praying and ask God to protect us and keep this misery away, I also think it’s important for every good Christian to recognize that it’s quite likely to come. Therefore, I recommend that he prepare and consider his options ahead of time, and I suggest everyone—even every woman—be ready with God’s help in their own minds for what they will do if the worst happens.
I
VINCENT: Well fare your heart, good uncle, for this good counsel of yours! For surely methinketh that this is marvellous good.
VINCENT: Well, take care of your heart, good uncle, for this great advice of yours! I really think this is wonderful.
But yet heard I once a right learned and very good man say that it would be great folly, and very perilous too, if a man should think upon any such thing or imagine any such question in his mind, for fear of double peril that may follow thereupon. For he shall be likely to answer himself that he will rather suffer any painful death than forsake his faith, and by that bold appointment should he fall into the fault of St. Peter, who of oversight made a proud promise and soon had a foul fall. Or else would he be likely to think that rather than abide the pain he would forsake God indeed, and by that mind should he sin deadly through his own folly, whereas he needeth not do so, since he shall peradventure never come in the peril to be put thereto. And therefore it would be most wisdom never to think upon any such manner of question.
But I once heard a very knowledgeable and good person say that it would be foolish and very dangerous for someone to think about or imagine such things in their mind, out of fear of the double danger that might follow. They might end up convincing themselves that they would rather endure any painful death than abandon their faith, and such bravado might lead them to make a proud promise like St. Peter did, which ended poorly for him. Alternatively, they might think that to avoid pain, they would actually give up on God, and in that mindset, they would sin gravely out of their own foolishness, even though they might never face the real danger that provokes such thoughts. Therefore, it would be wise not to dwell on such questions at all.
ANTHONY: I believe well, cousin, that you have heard some men who would so say. For I can show almost as much as that left in writing by a very good man and a great solemn doctor. But yet, cousin, although I should happen to find one or two more, as good men and as well learned too, who would both twain say and write the same, yet would I not fear for my part to counsel my friend to the contrary.
ANTHONY: I think, cousin, that you've heard some guys say that. I can show almost as much as that left in writing by a really good person and a serious scholar. But still, cousin, even if I came across one or two more, equally good and well-educated, who would both say and write the same, I wouldn’t hesitate to advise my friend otherwise.
For, cousin, if his mind answer him as St. Peter answered Christ, that he will rather die than forsake him, though he say therein more unto himself than he should be peradventure able to make good if it came to the point, yet I perceive not that he doth in that thought any deadly displeasure unto God. For St. Peter, though he said more than he could perform, yet in his so saying offended not God greatly neither. But his offence was when he did not afterward so well as he said before. But now may this man be likely never to fall in the peril of breaking that appointment, since of some ten thousand that shall so examine themselves, never one shall fall in the peril. And yet for them to have that good purpose all their life seemeth me no more harm in the meanwhile than for a poor beggar who hath never a penny to think that, if he had great substance, he would give great alms for God's sake.
Because, cousin, if he thinks like St. Peter did when he replied to Christ, that he would rather die than abandon him, even if he tells himself more than he could actually follow through on when the moment comes, I don’t see that he’s committing any serious offense against God with that thought. St. Peter, although he claimed more than he could deliver, didn’t greatly offend God just by saying it. His real mistake was when he didn’t live up to what he had previously stated. But now, this man is unlikely to ever face the risk of breaking that commitment, since out of ten thousand who reflect on themselves in that way, hardly anyone will fall into that danger. And yet, having that good intention throughout life seems no more harmful than a poor beggar who doesn’t have a penny thinking that if he were wealthy, he would give a lot to charity for God's sake.
But now is all the peril if the man answer himself that he would in such case rather forsake the faith of Christ with his mouth and keep it still in his heart than for the confessing of it to endure a painful death. For by this mind he falleth in deadly sin, which he never would have fallen in if he had never put himself the question. But in good faith methinketh that he who, upon that question put unto himself by himself, will make himself that answer, hath the habit of faith so faint and so cold that, for the better knowledge of himself and of his necessity to pray for more strength of grace, he had need to have the question put to him either by himself or by some other man.
But now the danger is that if a person answers themselves that they would rather deny the faith of Christ with their words and keep it in their heart than face a painful death for confessing it. With this mindset, they fall into a grave sin, one they would have avoided if they had never asked themselves that question. Honestly, I believe that anyone who, after asking themselves this question, concludes with that answer has a faith that is weak and cold. They would benefit from a better understanding of themselves and their need to pray for greater strength of grace, so they should have this question posed to them by themselves or someone else.
Besides this, to counsel a man never to think on that question is, to my mind, as reasonable as the medicine that I have heard taught someone for the toothache: to go thrice about a churchyard, and never think on a fox-tail! For if the counsel be not given them, it cannot serve them. And if it be given them, it must put the point of the matter in their mind. And forthwith to reject it, and think therein neither one thing nor the other, is a thing that may be sooner bidden than obeyed.
Besides this, telling someone never to think about that question seems to me as sensible as the advice I've heard for a toothache: to walk three times around a graveyard and not think about a fox's tail! If they’re not given advice, it won’t help them. And if they are given it, it will surely bring the issue to their mind. To ignore it and not think about it at all is something that might be easier said than done.
I think also that very few men can escape it. For though they would never think on it by themselves, yet in one place or another where they shall happen to come in company, they shall have the question by adventure so proposed and put forth that—like as, while a man heareth someone talking to him, he can close his eyes if he will, but he cannot make himself sleep—so shall they, whether they will or not, think one thing or the other therein.
I also believe that very few men can avoid it. Although they might not contemplate it on their own, in one situation or another, when they find themselves in a group, the topic will inevitably come up. Just as a person can close their eyes while someone is speaking to them, but can't force themselves to fall asleep, they will, whether they like it or not, think one way or another about it.
Finally, when Christ spoke so often and so plain of the matter, that every man should, upon pain of damnation, openly confess his faith if men took him and by dread of death would drive him to the contrary, it seemeth me (in a manner) implied that we are bound conditionally to have evermore that mind—actually sometimes, and evermore habitually—that if the case should so befall, then with God's help so we would do. And thus much methinketh necessary, for every man and woman to be always of this mind and often to think thereon. And where they find, in the thinking thereon, that their hearts shudder and shrink in the remembrance of the pain that their imagination representeth to the mind, then must they call to mind and remember the great pain and torment that Christ suffered for them, and heartily pray for grace that, if the case should so befall, God should give them strength to stand. And thus, with exercise of such meditation, through men should never stand full out of fear of falling, yet must they persevere in good hope and in full purpose of standing.
Finally, when Christ spoke so often and so plainly about the matter, that everyone should, under the threat of damnation, openly confess their faith—even if people tried to frighten them into doing the opposite—it seems to me that there is an implied obligation for us to always maintain that mindset. We should actually do so sometimes, and habitually hold that attitude, so that if the situation arises, with God's help, we would indeed act accordingly. I believe it is essential for every man and woman to consistently have this mindset and to think about it often. When they find that their hearts tremble at the thought of the pain their imagination presents, they should remember the great suffering and torment that Christ endured for them, and sincerely pray for the strength to stand firm if such a situation arises. Through this practice of meditation, while people may still experience fear of falling, they must continue to have hope and a strong intention to stand firm.
And this seemeth to me, cousin, so far forth the mind that every Christian man and woman must needs have, that methinketh every curate should often counsel all his parishioners, beginning in their tender youth, to know this point and think on it, and little by little from their very childhood accustom them sweetly and pleasantly in the meditation thereof. Thereby the goodness of God shall not fail so to inspire the grace of his Holy Spirit into their hearts, in reward of that virtuous diligence, that through such actual meditation he shall confirm them in such a sure habit of spiritual faithful strength, that all the devils in hell, with all the wrestling that they can make, shall never be able to wrest it out of their heart.
And this seems to me, cousin, that every Christian man and woman must have in mind, so I believe every pastor should regularly encourage all his parishioners, starting from their young age, to understand this point and think about it. Bit by bit, from their early childhood, they should be gently and joyfully guided in this meditation. This way, God's goodness will surely inspire the grace of His Holy Spirit in their hearts. In return for that virtuous effort, through such meditation, He will strengthen them with a solid habit of spiritual faith that no amount of effort from the devils in hell will ever be able to take away from their hearts.
VINCENT: By my troth, uncle, methinketh that you say very well.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, I think you're saying something really good.
ANTHONY: I say surely, cousin, as I think. And yet all this have I said concerning them that dwell in such places that they are never like in their lives to come in the danger to be put to the proof. Howbeit, many a man may think himself far from it, who yet may fortune to come to it by some chance or other, either for the truth of faith or for the truth of justice, which go almost all alike.
ANTHONY: I truly believe, cousin, that I’m right. Still, everything I’ve said about those who live in such places suggests they’re unlikely to ever face the threat of being tested. However, many people might think they’re far removed from that situation, yet they might find themselves in it by some chance, whether it be for the sake of their faith or for the sake of justice, which are often closely related.
But now you and I, cousin, and all our friends here, are far in another point. For we are so likely to fall in the experience of it soon, that it would have been more timely for us, all other things set aside, to have devised upon this matter, and firmly to have settled ourselves upon a false point long ago, than to begin to commune and counsel upon it now.
But now you and I, cousin, and all our friends here, are in a completely different situation. We are likely to experience this soon, so it would have been better for us, putting everything else aside, to have figured this out and settled on a false point a long time ago, rather than starting to discuss and think about it now.
VINCENT: In good faith, uncle, you say therein very truth, and would God it had come sooner in my mind. But yet is it better late than never. And I trust God shall yet give us respite and time. And that we lose no part thereof, uncle, I pray you proceed now with your good counsel therein.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, you're absolutely right, and I wish it had occurred to me sooner. But it's better late than never. I still believe that God will give us some time and a break. To make sure we don’t miss out on any of it, please go ahead and share your wise advice on this matter.
ANTHONY: Very gladly, cousin, shall I now go forth in the fourth temptation, which alone remaineth to be treated of, and properly pertaineth wholly unto this present purpose.
ANTHONY: I'm more than happy, cousin, to go ahead with the fourth temptation, which is the only one left to discuss and is completely relevant to our current purpose.
II
The fourth temptation, cousin, that the prophet speaketh of in the fore-remembered psalm is plain open persecution. And it is touched in these words: "Ab incursu et demonio meridiano."
The fourth temptation, cousin, that the prophet talks about in the previously mentioned psalm is obvious, visible persecution. This is expressed in these words: "Ab incursu et demonio meridiano."
And of all his temptations, this is the most perilous, the most bitter, the most sharp, and the most rigorous. For in other temptations he useth either pleasant allectives unto sin, or other secret sleights and snares; and cometh in the night and stealeth on in the dark unaware; or in some other part of the day flieth and passeth by like an arrow; so shaping himself sometimes in one fashion, sometimes in another, and dissimulating himself and his high mortal malice, that a man is thereby so blinded and beguiled that he cannot sometimes perceive well what he is. But in this temptation, this plain open persecution for the faith, he cometh even in the very midday—that is, even upon those who have a high light of faith shining in their hearts—and he openly suffereth himself to be perceived so plainly, by his fierce malicious persecution against the faithful Christians, for hatred of Christ's true Catholic faith, that no man having faith can doubt what he is. For in this temptation he showeth himself such as the prophet nameth him, "the midday devil," so lightsomely can he be seen with the eye of the faithful soul, by his fierce furious assault and incursion. For therefore saith the prophet that the truth of God shall compass that man round about who dwelleth in the faithful hope of his help with a shield "from the incursion and the devil of the midday," because this kind of persecution is not a wily temptation but a furious force and a terrible incursion. In other of his temptations, he stealeth on like a fox, but in this Turk's persecution for the faith, he runneth on roaring with assault like a ramping lion.
And out of all his temptations, this is the most dangerous, the most painful, the most intense, and the most severe. In other temptations, he uses either appealing lures to sin or other hidden tricks and traps; he sneaks in at night and quietly watches in the dark, or at other times darts by like an arrow. He takes on different forms and disguises himself, masking his true evil intentions so that a person can be so blinded and misled that they sometimes can’t clearly see what he really is. But in this temptation, this open and direct persecution for the faith, he comes right in the middle of the day—that is, to those who have a strong light of faith shining in their hearts—and he allows himself to be seen so clearly by his fierce and malicious attacks against faithful Christians, out of hatred for Christ's true Catholic faith, that anyone with faith cannot doubt what he is. In this temptation, he reveals himself as the prophet calls him, "the midday devil," so clearly can he be seen by the faithful soul through his violent and aggressive assaults. This is why the prophet says that the truth of God will surround the person who lives in hopeful faith with a shield "from the incursion and the devil of the midday," because this type of persecution is not a sneaky temptation but rather a violent force and a terrifying attack. In his other temptations, he sneaks in like a fox, but in this persecution for the faith, he charges in roaring like a fierce lion.
This temptation is, of all temptations, also the most perilous. For in temptations of prosperity he useth only delectable allectives to move a man to sin; and in other kinds of tribulation and adversity he useth only grief and pain to pull a man into murmuring, impatience, and blasphemy. But in this kind of persecution for the faith of Christ he useth both twain—that is, both his allectives of quiet and rest by deliverance from death and pain, with other pleasures also of this present life, and besides that the terror and infliction of intolerable pain and torment.
This temptation is, of all temptations, the most dangerous. In temptations of prosperity, he only uses appealing attractions to lead a person to sin; in other types of trials and hardship, he employs only sorrow and suffering to drive someone to complain, lose patience, and speak disrespectfully. But in this kind of persecution for Christ’s faith, he uses both—both the allurements of peace and safety by freeing one from death and pain, along with other pleasures of this life, and on top of that, the fear and infliction of unbearable pain and suffering.
In other tribulation—as loss, or sickness, or death of our friends—-though the pain be peradventure as great and sometimes greater too, yet is not the peril nowhere nigh half so much. For in other tribulations, as I said before, that necessity that the man must perforce abide and endure the pain, wax he never so wroth and impatient with it, is a great reason to move him to keep his patience in it and be content with it and thank God for it and of necessity make a virtue, that he may be rewarded for it. But in this temptation, this persecution for the faith—I mean not by fight in the field, by which the faithful man standeth at his defence and putteth the faithless in half the fear and half the harm too; but I mean where he is taken and held, and may for the forswearing or denying of his faith be delivered and suffered to live in rest and some in great worldly wealth also. In this case, I say, since he needeth not to suffer this trouble and pain unless he will, there is a marvellous great occasion for him to fall into the sin that the devil would drive him to—that is, the forsaking of the faith.
In other hardships—like loss, illness, or the death of friends—though the pain may be just as intense and sometimes even greater, the danger is nowhere near as significant. In other hardships, as I mentioned earlier, the necessity for a person to endure the pain, no matter how angry and impatient he becomes with it, gives him a strong reason to maintain his patience, accept it, thank God for it, and turn it into a virtue so he can be rewarded for it. But in this temptation, this persecution for faith—I’m not talking about fighting in battle, where a faithful person defends himself and instills fear in the faithless; I mean when he is captured and held, and he could escape this trouble by denying his faith, allowing him to live in comfort and sometimes great wealth. In this situation, since he doesn’t have to endure this trouble and pain unless he chooses to, there is a huge temptation for him to fall into the sin that the devil wants—namely, the abandonment of his faith.
And therefore, I say, of all the devil's temptations, this temptation, this persecution for the faith, is the most perilous.
And so, I say, of all the devil's temptations, this temptation, this persecution for the faith, is the most dangerous.
VINCENT: The more perilous, uncle, this temptation is—as indeed, of all the temptations, the most perilous it is—the more need have those who stand in peril of it to be well armed against it beforehand, with substantial advice and good counsel. For so may we the better bear that tribulation when it cometh, with the comfort and consolation thereof, and the better withstand the temptation.
VINCENT: The more dangerous this temptation is, uncle—and it truly is the most dangerous of all—the more those who are at risk of it need to be prepared in advance, with solid advice and good guidance. This way, we can better handle the challenges when they come, with comfort and support, and we can resist the temptation more effectively.
ANTHONY: You say, Cousin Vincent, therein very truth. And I am content therefore to fall in hand with it.
ANTHONY: You’re right, Cousin Vincent, and I’m ready to get started on it.
But forasmuch, cousin, as methinketh that of this tribulation you are somewhat more afraid than I—and of truth somewhat more excusable it is in you than it would be in me, mine age considered and the sorrow that I have suffered already, with some other considerations upon my part besides—rehearse you therefore the griefs and pains that you think in this tribulation possible to fall unto you. And I shall against each of them give you counsel and rehearse you such occasion of comfort and consolation as my poor wit and learning can call unto my mind.
But since, cousin, I think you are a bit more afraid of this trouble than I am—and honestly, it's a bit more understandable for you than it is for me, considering my age and the struggles I've already faced, along with some other reasons on my end—please share the worries and pains you think might come from this trouble. I'll provide advice for each and share any sources of comfort and support that my limited knowledge and experience can think of.
VINCENT: In good faith, uncle, I am not wholly afraid in this case only for myself, but well you know I have cause to care also for many others, and that folk of sundry sorts, men and women both, and that not all of one age.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, I’m not only worried about myself in this situation, but you know I have reasons to care about many others too. There are various people involved, both men and women, and they’re not all the same age.
ANTHONY: All that you have cause to fear for, cousin, for all of them, have I cause to fear with you, too, since almost all your kinsfolk are likewise kin to me. Howbeit, to say the truth, every man hath cause in this case to fear both for himself and for every other. For since, as the scripture saith, "God hath given every man care and charge of his neighbour," there is no man who hath any spark of Christian love and charity in his breast but what, in a matter of such peril as this is, in which the soul of man standeth in so great danger to be lost, he must needs care and take thought not only for his friends but also for his very foes. We shall therefore, cousin, not rehearse your harms or mine that may befall in this persecution, but all the great harms in general, as near as we can call to mind, that may happen unto any man.
ANTHONY: Everything you’re worried about, cousin, I’m worried about too, since almost all your family is also related to me. To be honest, every person has reason to be concerned both for themselves and for others. Because, as the scripture says, "God has entrusted every person with the care of their neighbor," anyone with even a little bit of Christian love and kindness in their heart must, in such a dangerous situation as this, where a person's soul is at great risk of being lost, care and think not just about their friends but also about their enemies. So, cousin, instead of listing our individual problems that could arise from this persecution, let’s talk about the greater harms in general, as best as we can remember, that could happen to anyone.
III
Since a man is made of the body and the soul, all the harm that any man can take, it must needs be in one of these two, either immediately or by the means of some such thing as serveth for the pleasure, welfare, or commodity of one of these two.
Since a person is made up of both body and soul, any harm that a person can experience must come from one of these two aspects, either directly or through something that serves the pleasure, well-being, or needs of one of them.
As for the soul first, we shall need no rehearsal of any harm that may attain to it by this kind of tribulation, unless by some inordinate love and affection that the soul bear to the body, she consent to slide from the faith and thereby do herself harm. Now there remains the body, and these outward things of fortune which serve for the maintenance of the body and minister matter of pleasure to the soul also, through the delight that she hath in the body for the while that she is matched with it.
As for the soul, we don't need to go over any damage it might face from this type of suffering, unless the soul's excessive love and attachment to the body leads it to stray from the faith and harm itself. Now, we turn to the body and the external things that support it and provide pleasure to the soul as well, through the enjoyment the soul experiences while it is connected to the body.
Consider first the loss of those outward things, as being somewhat less in weight than the body itself. What may a man lose in them, and thereby what pain may he suffer?
Consider first the loss of those external things, as they are somewhat lighter than the body itself. What might a person lose in them, and what pain might they endure as a result?
VINCENT: He may lose, uncle, money, plate, and other movable substance (of which I should somewhat lose myself); then, offices and authority; and finally all the lands of his inheritance for ever that he himself and his heirs perpetually might otherwise enjoy. And of all these things, uncle, you know well that I myself have some—little, in respect of that which some others have here, but yet somewhat more than he who hath most here would be well content to lose.
VINCENT: He might lose, uncle, money, possessions, and other movable assets (which I would also lose a bit of); then, jobs and power; and finally all the lands he would inherit forever, which he and his heirs could otherwise enjoy. And of all these things, uncle, you know I have some—maybe not as much as others have here, but still more than the person with the most would be willing to lose.
Upon the loss of these things follow neediness and poverty; the pain of lacking, the shame of begging (of which twain I know not which is the most wretched necessity); besides, the grief and heaviness of heart, in beholding good men and faithful and his dear friends bewrapped in like misery, and ungracious wretches and infidels and his mortal enemies enjoying the commodities that he himself and his friends have lost.
Upon losing these things, one faces need and poverty; the pain of lacking, the shame of begging (and I can't tell which is the more miserable necessity); plus, the sorrow and heaviness in seeing good people, loyal friends, wrapped up in the same misery, while ungrateful wretches, infidels, and his mortal enemies enjoy the comforts that he and his friends have lost.
Now, for the body very few words should serve us. For therein I see none other harm but loss of liberty, labour, imprisonment, and painful and shameful death.
Now, for the main part, very few words should be enough for us. Because in that, I see no other harm but the loss of freedom, hard work, imprisonment, and a painful and shameful death.
ANTHONY: There needeth not much more, cousin, as the world is now. For I fear me that less than a fourth part of this will make many a man sore stagger in his faith, and some fall quite from it, who yet at this day, before he come to the proof, thinketh himself that he would stand very fast. And I beseech our Lord that all those who so think, and who would yet when they were brought to the point fall from the faith for fear or pain, may get of God the grace to think still as they do and not to be brought to the essay, where pain or fear would show them, as it showed St. Peter, how far they are deceived now.
ANTHONY: There really isn’t much more to say, cousin, given how the world is today. I worry that even a little less than a quarter of this could cause many people to seriously waver in their faith, and some might completely abandon it, even though right now, before facing the test, they believe they would stand strong. I pray that all those who think this way, and who might fall away under pressure or pain, will receive from God the grace to continue believing as they do and never face the trial that could reveal, like it did for St. Peter, how mistaken they truly are.
But now, cousin, against these terrible things, what way shall we take in giving men counsel of comfort? If the faith were in our days as fervent as it hath been ere this in times past, little counsel and little comfort would suffice. We should not much need with words and reasoning to extenuate and diminish the vigour and asperity of the pains. For of old times, the greater and the more bitter the pain were, the more ready was the fervour of faith to suffer it. And surely, cousin, I doubt little in my mind but what, if a man had in his heart so deep a desire and love—longing to be with God in heaven, to have the fruition of his glorious face—as had those holy men who are martyrs in old time, he would no more now stick at the pain that he must pass between than those old holy martyrs did at that time. But alas, our faint and feeble faith, with our love to God less than lukewarm because of the fiery affection that we bear to our own filthy flesh, maketh us so dull in the desire of heaven that the sudden dread of every bodily pain woundeth us to the heart and striketh our devotion dead. And therefore hath every man, cousin, as I said before, much the more need to think upon this thing many a time and oft aforehand, ere any such peril befall, by much devising upon it before they see cause to fear it. Since the thing shall not appear so terrible unto them, reason shall better enter, and through grace working with their diligence, engender and set sure, not a sudden slight affection of suffering for God's sake, but, by a long continuance, a strong deep-rooted habit—not like a reed ready to wave with every wind, nor like a rootless tree scantly set up on end in a loose heap of light sand, that will with a blast or two be blown down.
But now, cousin, considering these terrible things, how should we advise people in finding comfort? If faith today were as strong as it used to be in the past, we wouldn’t need much counsel or comfort. We wouldn’t have to rely much on words and reasoning to downplay the intensity and harshness of suffering. In the old days, the greater and more painful the suffering was, the more fervently people's faith helped them endure it. And truly, cousin, I have little doubt that if someone had a deep desire and love in their heart—longing to be with God in heaven, to experience His glorious presence—like those holy martyrs from the past, they wouldn’t hesitate at the pain they must face any more than those martyrs did back then. But alas, our weak and feeble faith, combined with our love for God being less than warm due to our fiery attachment to our own sinful nature, makes us so dull in our desire for heaven that the sudden fear of any physical pain pierces our hearts and extinguishes our devotion. Therefore, every person, cousin, as I mentioned before, needs to think about this many times beforehand, before any such danger occurs, by contemplating it well before they find a reason to fear it. This way, the situation won’t seem so daunting, reason can take better hold, and with grace working alongside their efforts, they can develop a strong, deep-rooted habit—not just a fleeting moment of suffering for God’s sake, but a lasting conviction—one that isn’t like a reed swaying with every breeze or a tree without roots that can easily be knocked over by a gust of wind.
IV
Let us now consider, cousin, these causes of terror and dread that you have recited, which in his persecution for the faith this midday devil may, by these Turks, rear against us to make his incursion with. For so shall we well perceive, weighing them well with reason, that, albeit they be indeed somewhat, yet (every part of the matter pondered) they shall well appear in conclusion things not so much to be dreaded and fled from as they do suddenly seem to folk at the first sight.
Let’s now think about, cousin, the reasons for fear and anxiety that you’ve mentioned, which this midday devil might use through these Turks in his attack on us during his persecution of the faith. By carefully considering these reasons, we’ll see that, while they do have some weight, when we examine each part of the situation, they will turn out to be less frightening and avoidable than they initially seem to people at first glance.
V
First let us begin at the outward goods, which are neither the proper goods of the soul nor those of the body, but are called the goods of fortune, and serve for the sustenance and commodity of man for the short season of this present life, as worldly substance, offices, honour, and authority.
First, let’s start with external possessions, which aren’t the true goods of the soul or the body, but are referred to as the goods of fortune. These serve to provide for and benefit humans during the brief time of this current life, such as material wealth, jobs, honor, and power.
What great good is there in these things of themselves, that they should be worthy so much as to bear the name by which the world, of a worldly favour, customarily calleth them? For if the having of strength make a man strong, and the having of heat make a man hot, and the having of virtue make a man virtuous, how can these things be verily and truly "goods," by the having of which he who hath them may as well be worse as better—and, as experience proveth, more often is worse than better? Why should a man greatly rejoice in that which he daily seeth most abound in the hands of many who are wicked? Do not now this great Turk and his pashas in all these advancements of fortune surmount very far above a Christian estate, and any lords living under him? And was there not, some twenty years ago, the great Sultan of Syria, who many a year together bore himself as high as the great Turk, and afterward in one summer unto the great Turk that whole empire was lost? And so may all his empire now—and shall hereafter, by God's grace—be lost into Christian men's hands likewise, when Christian people shall be amended and grow in God's favour again. But since whole kingdoms and mighty great empires are of so little surety to stand, but are so soon transferred from one man unto another, what great thing can you or I—yea, or any lord, the greatest in this land—reckon himself to have, by the possession of a heap of silver or gold? For they are but white and yellow metal, not so profitable of their own nature, save for a little glittering, as the rude rusty metal of iron.
What real value do these things have on their own that they should deserve the title the world, influenced by worldly favor, usually gives them? If having strength makes a person strong, having warmth makes someone warm, and having virtue makes a person virtuous, how can these things truly be considered "goods," since possessing them could make someone worse just as easily as it could make them better—and often, as experience shows, it tends to make them worse? Why should someone feel great joy in what they see many wicked individuals possess daily? Doesn’t the great Turk and his officials, with all their good fortune, far exceed a Christian's status and any lords under him? And wasn’t there, about twenty years ago, the great Sultan of Syria, who held himself as lofty as the great Turk, only to lose that entire empire to the great Turk in one summer? So, too, may his empire one day—and, God willing, will—fall into the hands of Christian people, when they improve and find favor with God again. But since entire kingdoms and enormous empires are so unstable, quickly shifting from one person to another, what real significance can you or I—indeed, any lord, even the highest in this land—attach to having a pile of silver or gold? They're just shiny metal, not very useful in their own right, aside from a bit of sparkle, similar to the rough rust of iron.
VI
Lands and possessions many men esteem much more yet than money, because the lands seem not so casual as money is, or plate. For though their other substance may be stolen and taken away, yet evermore they think that their land will lie still where it lay. But what are we the better that our land cannot be stirred, but will lie still where it lay, since we ourselves may be removed and not suffered to come near it? What great difference is there to us, whether our substance be movable or unmovable, since we be so movable ourselves that we may be removed from them both and lose them both twain? Yet sometimes in the money is the surety somewhat more. For when we be fain ourselves to flee, we may make shift to carry some of our money with us, whereas of our land we cannot carry one inch.
Lands and possessions are valued by many more than money because land doesn’t seem as random as money or jewelry. Even though other valuables can be stolen or taken away, they always believe their land will stay put. But how does it help us that our land can’t be moved and remains where it is, if we ourselves might be forced to leave and not allowed to get close to it? What’s the real difference for us, whether our assets are movable or immovable, when we are so easily affected that we could be taken from both and lose them both? Sometimes money offers a bit more security. When we need to escape, we can at least take some money with us, while we can’t carry even a small piece of our land.
If our land be a thing of more surety than our money, how happeth it then that in this persecution we are more afraid to lose it? For if it be a thing of more surety, then can it not so soon be lost. In the transfer of these two great empires—Greece first, since I myself was born, and after Syria, since you were born too—the land was lost before the money was found!
If our land is more secure than our money, then why are we more afraid to lose it during this persecution? If it really is more secure, then it shouldn't be lost so easily. In the transfer of these two great empires—Greece first, since I was born, and then Syria, since you were born—the land was lost before the money was even found!
Oh, Cousin Vincent, if the whole world were animated with a reasonable soul, as Plato thought it were, and if it had wit and understanding to mark and perceive everything, Lord God, how the ground on which a prince buildeth his palace would loud laugh its lord to scorn, when it saw him proud of his possession and heard him boast himself that he and his blood are for ever the very lords and owners of the land! For then would the ground think the while, to itself, "Ah, thou poor soul, who thinkest thou wert half a god, and art amid thy glory but a man in a gay gown! I who am the ground here, over whom thou are so proud, have had a hundred such owners of me as thou callest thyself, more than ever thou hast heard the names of. And some of them who went proudly over mine head now lie low in my belly, and my side lieth over them. And many a one shall, as thou does now, call himself mine owner after thee, who shall neither be kin to thy blood nor have heard any word of thy name."
Oh, Cousin Vincent, if the whole world were filled with a rational soul, as Plato believed, and had the wit and understanding to notice everything, my goodness, how the ground under a prince's palace would laugh at him when it saw him so proud of his possessions and heard him boast that he and his lineage are forever the true lords and owners of the land! For then the ground would think to itself, "Ah, you poor soul, who believes you are half a god, and in the midst of your glory, you are just a man in a fancy robe! I, the ground you are so proud of, have had a hundred such owners like you, more than you’ve ever heard names of. And some of those who walked proudly over me now lie buried beneath me, and my surface covers them. Many will, like you now, claim to be my owner after you, who will neither be related to your blood nor have ever heard your name."
Who owned your village, cousin, three thousand years ago?
Who owned your village, cousin, three thousand years ago?
VINCENT: Three thousand, uncle? Nay, nay, in any king, Christian or heathen, you may strike off a third part of that well enough—and, as far as I know, half of the rest, too. In far fewer years than three thousand it may well fortune that a poor ploughman's blood may come up to a kingdom, and a king's right royal kin on the other hand fall down to the plough and cart, and neither that king know that ever he came from the cart, nor that carter know that ever he came from the crown.
VINCENT: Three thousand, uncle? No way, in any kingdom, whether Christian or pagan, you can easily take a third of that off—and, from what I see, even half of the rest too. In far fewer years than three thousand, it’s very possible that a poor farmer's blood could rise to a kingdom, while a king's royal lineage might end up back in the fields, and neither that king would know he ever came from the fields, nor would that farmer know he ever came from a crown.
ANTHONY: We find, Cousin Vincent, in full ancient stories many strange changes as marvellous as that, come about in the compass of very few years, in effect. And are such things then in reason so greatly to be set by, that we should esteem the loss so great, when we see that in keeping them our surety is so little?
ANTHONY: We discover, Cousin Vincent, in many old stories that amazing transformations happen over just a few years, truly. So, should we really value these things so highly that we mourn their loss, when we see that holding on to them provides us so little security?
VINCENT: Marry, uncle, but the less surety we have to keep it, since it is a great commodity to have it, so much more the loth we are to forgo it.
VINCENT: Sure, uncle, but the less certainty we have in keeping it, since it's such a valuable thing to have, the more reluctant we are to give it up.
ANTHONY: That reason shall I, cousin, turn against yourself. For if it be so as you say, that since the things be commodious, the less surety that you see you have of keeping them, the more cause you have to be afraid of losing them; then on the other hand the more a thing is of its nature such that its commodity bringeth a man little surety and much fear, that thing of reason the less we have cause to love. And then, the less cause we have to love a thing, the less cause have we to care for it or fear its loss, or be loth to go from it.
ANTHONY: That reason will make me turn against you, cousin. If it's true what you say, that since these things are convenient, the less assurance you have in keeping them means more reason to be scared of losing them; then conversely, the more something naturally brings a person little security and a lot of fear, the less we should love it. And so, the less reason we have to love something, the less reason we have to care about it, fear losing it, or hesitate to let it go.
VII
We shall yet, cousin, consider in these outward goods of fortune—as riches, good name, honest estimation, honourable fame, and authority—in all these things we shall, I say, consider that we love them and set by them either as things commodious unto us for the state and condition of this present life, or else as things that we purpose by the good use of them to make matter of our merit, with God's help, in the life to come.
We should, cousin, think about these external benefits of fortune—like wealth, reputation, respect, honorable fame, and authority—in all these things, I mean, we appreciate and value them either as things that are useful for our current lives or as things we intend to use well to earn merit, with God’s help, in the life to come.
Let us then first consider them as things set by and beloved for the pleasure and commodity of them for this present life.
Let’s first see them as things created for and valued because of the enjoyment and usefulness they bring to our lives right now.
VIII
Now, as for riches, if we consider it well, the commodity that we take of it is not so great as our own foolish affection and fancy maketh us imagine it. I deny not that it maketh us go much more gay and glorious in sight, garnished in silk—but wool is almost as warm! It maketh us have great plenty of many kinds of delicate and delicious victuals, and thereby to make more excess—but less exquisite and less superfluous fare, with fewer surfeits and fewer fevers too, would be almost as wholesome! Then, the labour in getting riches, the fear in keeping them, and the pain in parting from them, do more than counterweight a great part of all the pleasure and commodity that they bring.
Now, when it comes to wealth, if we think about it carefully, the value we get from it isn’t nearly as significant as our own foolish affection and imagination leads us to believe. I won’t deny that it makes us look much more cheerful and impressive, decked out in silk—but wool is almost as warm! It allows us to enjoy a lot of fancy and tasty food, leading to more indulgence—but simpler and healthier meals, with fewer excesses and fewer illnesses, would be just as beneficial! Plus, the effort spent acquiring wealth, the anxiety of holding on to it, and the pain of letting it go outweigh a good portion of the enjoyment and benefits it brings.
Besides this, riches are the thing that taketh many times from its master all his pleasure and his life, too. For many a man is slain for his riches. And some keep their riches as a thing pleasant and commodious for their life, take none other pleasure of it in all their life than as though they bore the key of another man's coffer. For they are content to live miserably in neediness all their days, rather than to find it in their heart to diminish their hoard, they have such a fancy to look thereon. Yea, and some men, for fear lest thieves should steal it from them, are their own thieves and steal it from themselves. For they dare not so much as let it lie where they themselves may look on it, but put it in a pot and hide it in the ground, and there let it lie safe till they die—and sometimes seven years thereafter. And if the pot had been stolen away from that place five years before the man's death, then all the same five years he lived thereafter, thinking always that his pot lay safe still, since he never occupied it afterward, what had he been the poorer?
Besides this, wealth often takes away all the joy and life from its owner. Many men have lost their lives over their riches. Some people treat their wealth as a source of pleasure and convenience, deriving no other enjoyment from it than the feeling of holding the key to someone else's treasure. They choose to live in a state of misery and want all their lives instead of finding the courage to reduce their hoard, simply because they enjoy looking at it. Yes, and some men, out of fear that thieves might steal it, become their own thieves and deprive themselves. They won’t even leave it where they can see it; instead, they put it in a pot and bury it in the ground, leaving it hidden and safe until they die—and sometimes seven years after that. If the pot had been stolen five years before their death, they would live the same five years believing their pot was still safe, thinking that since they never touched it afterward, they hadn't lost anything.
VINCENT: By my troth, uncle, not one penny, for aught that I perceive.
VINCENT: I swear, uncle, not a single penny, as far as I can tell.
IX
ANTHONY: Let us now consider good name, honest estimation, and honourable fame. For these three things are of their own nature one, and take their differences in effect only of the manner of the common speech in diversity of degree. For a good name may a man have, be he never so poor. Honest estimation, in the common understanding of the people, belongeth not unto any man but him that is taken for one of some countenance and possessions, and among his neighbours had in some reputation. In the word of "honourable fame," folk conceive the renown of great estates, much and far spoken of, by reason of their laudable acts.
ANTHONY: Let's talk about a good name, honest reputation, and honorable fame. These three things are essentially the same, differing only in how people commonly express them based on varying degrees. A person can have a good name, even if they are very poor. Honest reputation, as understood by most people, belongs only to someone who is viewed as having some status and possessions, and who is held in regard by their neighbors. When people think of "honorable fame," they envision the reputation of wealthy individuals, often spoken about widely because of their commendable actions.
Now, all this gear, used as a thing pleasant and commodious for this present life, may seem pleasant to him who fasteneth his fancy thereon. But of the nature of the thing itself I perceive no great commodity that it hath—I say of the nature of the thing itself, because it may by chance be some occasion of some commodity. For it may hap that for the good name the poor man hath, or for the honest estimation that a man of some possessions and substance standeth in among his neighbours, or for the honourable fame with which a great estate is renowned—it may hap, I say, that some man, bearing them the better, will therefore do them some good. And yet, as for that, like as it may sometimes so hap (and sometimes doth so hap indeed), so may it hap sometimes on the other hand (and on the other hand so it sometimes happeth indeed) that such folk are envied and hated by others, and as readily take harm by them who envy and hate them as they take good by them that love them.
Now, all this stuff, which we think of as nice and convenient for our current lives, might seem appealing to someone who focuses on it. But when I look at the essence of the matter, I don’t see much value in it. I mean the essence of the thing itself, because there might occasionally be some benefit from it. It could happen that because of the good reputation a poor person has or because of the respectable standing of someone with some wealth among their neighbors, or due to the honorable reputation that comes with a large estate, it’s possible that someone will do them a favor just because of that. Yet, just as it's possible for good things to come from this (and sometimes they do), it can also happen on the flip side that such individuals are envied and disliked by others, and they can just as easily suffer harm from those who envy and hate them as they can receive good from those who care for them.
But now, to speak of the thing itself in its own proper nature, what is it but a blast of another man's mouth, as soon past as spoken? He who setteth his delight on it, feedeth himself but with wind; be he never so full, he hath little substance therein. And many times shall he much deceive himself. For he shall think that many praise him who never speak word of him. And they that do, say yet much less than he thinketh and far more seldom too. For they spend not all the day, he may be sure, in talking of him alone. And those who so commend him the most will yet, I daresay, in every four-and-twenty hours, shut their eyes and forget him once! Besides this, while one speaketh well of him in one place, another sitteth and saith as ill of him in another. And finally, some who most praise him in his presence, behind his back mock him as fast and loud laugh him to scorn, and sometimes slily to his own face, too. And yet are there some fools so fed with this foolish fancy of fame that they rejoice and glory to think how they are continually praised all about, as though all the world did nothing else, day nor night, but ever sit and sing "Sanctus sanctus, sanctus" upon them!
But now, to talk about the thing itself in its true nature, what is it but just a breath from someone else's mouth, gone as soon as it’s spoken? Whoever takes pleasure in it is only feeding on empty air; no matter how full he feels, there’s little substance to it. And often, he ends up fooling himself. He will think that many are praising him when in reality, no one is saying anything about him. And those who do speak about him say much less than he imagines, and much less often too. They certainly don’t spend the whole day talking about him alone. Those who praise him the most will, I bet, forget about him at least once every day! Furthermore, while one person is saying nice things about him in one place, another is sitting somewhere else saying terrible things about him. Ultimately, some who praise him to his face are mocking him just as loudly behind his back, and sometimes even with a sly grin right in front of him too. Yet, there are some fools so caught up in this silly idea of fame that they take joy in thinking they are constantly praised all around, as if the whole world does nothing day or night but sit and sing "Sanctus sanctus, sanctus" about them!
X
And into this pleasant frenzy of much foolish vainglory are there some men brought sometimes by those whom they themselves do (in a manner) hire to flatter them. And they would not be content if a man should do otherwise, but would be right angry—not only if a man told them truth when they do evil indeed, but also if they praise it but slenderly.
And into this enjoyable chaos of excessive pride, some men are occasionally led by those they essentially pay to flatter them. They wouldn’t be satisfied if someone behaved differently; instead, they would be quite angry— not just if someone told them the truth when they were truly in the wrong, but also if they only gave it minimal praise.
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, this is very truth. I have been ere this, and not very long ago, where I saw so proper experience of this point that I must stop your tale long enough to tell you mine.
VINCENT: Truly, uncle, this is very true. I have been there before, and not too long ago, where I saw such a clear example of this point that I must pause your story long enough to share my own.
ANTHONY: I pray you, cousin, tell on.
ANTHONY: I ask you, cousin, please go on.
VINCENT: When I was first in Germany, uncle, it happed me to be somewhat favoured by a great man of the church and a great estate, one of the greatest in all that country there. And indeed, whosoever could spend as much as he could for one thing and another, would be a right great estate in any country of Christendom. But vainglorious was he, very far above all measure. And that was great pity, for it did harm and made him abuse many great gifts that God had given him. Never was he satiated with hearing his own praise.
VINCENT: When I was first in Germany, Uncle, I happened to be somewhat favored by a powerful church figure and a big landowner, one of the most influential in the whole country. Honestly, anyone who could spend as much as he did on various things would be considered quite wealthy in any place in Christendom. But he was incredibly vain, far beyond reason. It was a great shame, as this did harm and led him to misuse many of the wonderful gifts that God had given him. He was never satisfied with hearing his own praises.
So happed it one day, that he had in a great audience made an oration in a certain manner, in which he liked himself so well that at his dinner he thought he sat on thorns till he might hear how those who sat with him at his board would commend it. He sat musing a while, devising, as I thought afterward, upon some pretty proper way to bring it in withal. And at last, for lack of a better, lest he should have forborne the matter too long, he brought it even bluntly forth and asked us all who sat at his board's end—for at his own place in the midst there sat but himself alone—how well we liked his oration that he had made that day. But in faith, uncle, when that problem was once proposed, till it was full answered, no man, I believe, ate one morsel of meat more—every man was fallen in so deep a study for the finding of some exquisite praise. For he who should have brought out but a vulgar and common commendation, would have thought himself shamed for ever. Ten said we our sentences, by row as we sat, from the lowest unto the highest in good order, as though it had been a great matter of the common weal in a right solemn council. When it came to my part—I say it not, uncle, for a boast—methought that, by our Lady, for my part, I quit myself well enough! And I liked myself the better because methought that, being but a foreigner, my words went yet with some grace in the German tongue, in which, letting my Latin alone, it pleased me to show my skill. And I hoped to be liked the better because I saw that he who sat next to me, and should say his sentence after me, was an unlearned priest, for he could speak no Latin at all. But when he came forth for his part with my lord's commendation, the wily fox had been so well accustomed in court to the craft of flattery that he went beyond me by far. And then might I see by him what excellence a right mean wit may come to in one craft, if in all his life he studieth and busieth his wit about no more but that one. But I made afterward a solemn vow unto myself that if ever he and I were matched together at that board again, when we should fall to our flattery I would flatter in Latin, that he might contend with me no more. For though I could be content to be outrun by a horse, yet would I no more abide it to be outrun by an ass.
One day, he gave a speech in front of a large audience that he was so pleased with that during dinner, he felt restless until he could hear how those around him would praise it. He sat thinking for a while, trying to come up with a clever way to bring it up. Finally, not wanting to wait too long, he bluntly asked everyone sitting at the far end of the table—since he sat alone in the middle—how much they liked his speech from that day. But honestly, uncle, once that question was asked, I don't believe anyone took another bite of food—everyone was lost in deep thought, trying to come up with some exceptional praise. Anyone who offered just a run-of-the-mill compliment would feel forever shamed. We took turns sharing our thoughts, starting from the lowest to the highest, in an orderly fashion, as if it were a serious matter in a formal council. When it was my turn—I don’t mean to brag, uncle—I thought I did quite well! I felt even better because, being a foreigner, my words still had some grace in German, as I chose to showcase my skills instead of using Latin. I hoped to impress even more, knowing the person next to me, who would speak after me, was an uneducated priest who didn’t know any Latin. But when it was his turn and he received my lord's commendation, the clever guy had become so skilled in the art of flattery from his time at court that he easily surpassed me. And then I realized how much a clever person can excel in one skill if they devote all their thought and effort to it throughout their life. Later, I made a serious vow to myself that if we ever found ourselves at the same table again, during the flattery, I would flatter in Latin so he wouldn’t be able to compete with me. Because while I could accept being outdone by a horse, I couldn’t bear to be outdone by a donkey.
But, uncle, here began now the game: he that sat highest and was to speak last, was a great beneficed man, and not only a doctor but also somewhat learned indeed in the laws of the church. A world was it to see how he marked every man's word who spoke before him! And it seemed that the more proper every word was, the worse he liked it, for the cumbrance that he had to study out a better one to surpass it. The man even sweated with the labour, so that he was fain now and then to wipe his face. Howbeit, in conclusion, when it came to his course, we who had spoken before him had so taken up all among us before that we had not left him one wise word to speak afterward.
But, uncle, this is where the game began: the person who sat at the top and was supposed to speak last was a wealthy and respected man, not just a doctor but also quite knowledgeable about church law. It was quite a sight to see how he paid attention to every word spoken before him! It seemed that the more appropriate each word was, the less he liked it, because then he had to come up with something even better to top it. He was sweating from the effort, often needing to wipe his face. However, by the time it was his turn to speak, we who had gone before him had used up all the good points, leaving him without anything wise to say afterward.
ANTHONY: Alas, good man—among so many of you, some good fellow should have lent him one!
ANTHONY: Unfortunately, my good man—out of all of you, one decent person should have given him one!
VINCENT: It needed not, as it happened, uncle. For he found out such a shift that in his flattering he surpassed us all.
VINCENT: It didn't need to, actually, uncle. Because he figured out such a trick that in his flattery he outshined all of us.
ANTHONY: Why, what said he, cousin?
ANTHONY: What did he say, cousin?
VINCENT: By our Lady, uncle, not one word. But he did as I believe Pliny telleth of Apelles the painter, in the picture that he painted of the sacrifice and death of Iphigenia, in the making of the sorrowful countenances of the noble men of Greece who beheld it. He reserved the countenance of King Agamemnon her father for the last, lest, if he made his visage before, he must in some of the others afterward either have made the visage less dolorous than he could, and thereby have forborne some part of his praise, or, doing the uttermost of his craft, might have happed to make some other look more heavily for the pity of her pain than her own father, which would have been yet a far greater fault in his painting. When he came, therefore, to the making of her father's face last of all, he had spent out so much of his craft and skill that he could devise no manner of new heavy cheer and countenance for him but what he had made there aleady in some of the others a much more heavy one before. And therefore, to the intent that no man should see what manner of countenance it was that her father had, the painter was fain to paint him holding his face in his handkerchief!
VINCENT: By our Lady, uncle, not a single word. But he did what I believe Pliny said about Apelles the painter, in the picture he created of the sacrifice and death of Iphigenia, in portraying the sorrowful faces of the noble men of Greece who witnessed it. He saved the expression of King Agamemnon, her father, for last, to avoid the risk that if he painted his face earlier, he might make the faces of the others afterward less mournful than they could be, and thus miss out on part of his praise. Or, by exerting all his skill, he might unintentionally create an expression in someone else that was more sorrowful than that of her own father, which would have been an even bigger mistake in his painting. So when he finally reached the point of painting her father's face, he had already exhausted so much of his skill that he couldn't come up with any new expression of profound sadness for him that he hadn't already depicted in someone else's face, which was even heavier than what he could give the father. And so, to ensure no one would see what expression her father held, the painter had to paint him with his face covered by a handkerchief!
The like pageant (in a manner) played us there this good ancient honourable flatterer. For when he saw that he could find no words of praise that would surpass all that had been spoken before already, the wily fox would speak never a word. But as one who were ravished heavenward with the wonder of the wisdom and eloquence that my lord's grace had uttered in that oration, he set up a long sigh with an "Oh!" from the bottom of his breast, and held up both his hands, and lifted up his head, and cast up his eyes into the welkin, and wept.
The same kind of show played out with us by this good, old-fashioned flatterer. When he realized he couldn’t find any words of praise that would top what had already been said, the clever fox stayed silent. But as if completely mesmerized by the wisdom and eloquence of my lord’s speech, he let out a long sigh followed by a heartfelt “Oh!” from deep within, raised both his hands, lifted his head, and gazed up into the sky, shedding tears.
ANTHONY: Forsooth, cousin, he played his part very properly. But was that great prelate's oration, cousin, at all praiseworthy? For you can tell, I see well. For you would not, I suppose, play as Juvenal merrily describeth the blind senator, one of the flatterers of Tiberius the emperor, who among the rest so magnified the great fish that the emperor had sent for them to show them. This blind senator—Montanus, I believe they called him—marvelled at the fish as much as any that marvelled most. And many things he spoke of it, with some of his words directed unto it, looking himself toward his left side, while the fish lay on his right side! You would not, I am sure, cousin, have taken upon you to praise it so, unless you had heard it.
ANTHONY: Honestly, cousin, he did his role quite well. But was that great prelate's speech really commendable? I can tell you’re aware of this. I assume you wouldn’t play it up like Juvenal humorously describes the blind senator, one of Tiberius the emperor’s flatterers, who praised the big fish that the emperor had sent to show off. This blind senator—Montanus, I think he was called—was just as amazed by the fish as anyone else. He talked about it a lot, with some of his comments directed toward it, even though he was looking to his left side while the fish was on his right! I’m sure, cousin, you wouldn’t have taken it upon yourself to praise it like that unless you’d actually heard it.
VINCENT: I heard it, uncle, indeed, and, to say the truth, it was not to dispraise. Howbeit, surely, somewhat less praise might have served it—less by a great deal more than half. But this I am sure: had it been the worst that ever was made, the praise would not have been the less by one hair. For those who used to praise him to his face never considered how much the thing deserved, but how great a laud and praise they themselves could give his good Grace.
VINCENT: I heard it, uncle, I really did, and honestly, it wasn’t meant to be negative. However, honestly, it could’ve used a lot less praise—more than half less. But I can say this for sure: even if it had been the worst thing ever created, the praise wouldn’t have changed at all. Those who praised him to his face never thought about how much it really deserved praise, but rather how much they could show off their own praise for his good Grace.
ANTHONY: Surely, cousin, as Terence saith, such folk make men of fools even stark mad. And much cause have their lords to be right angry with them.
ANTHONY: Surely, cousin, as Terence says, those people drive even the most sensible men completely crazy. And their lords have every reason to be very angry with them.
VINCENT: God hath indeed, and is, I daresay. But as for their lords, uncle, if they would afterward wax angry with them for it, they would, to my mind, do them very great wrong. For it is one of the things that they specially keep them for. For those who are of such vainglorious mind, be they lords or be they meaner men, can be much better contented to have their devices commended than amended. And though they require their servant and their friend never so specially to tell them the very truth, yet shall he better please them if he speak them fair than if he telleth them the truth.
VINCENT: God has indeed given and continues to give, I must say. But as for their lords, uncle, if they later get angry with them for it, I believe it would be very unfair. It's one of the reasons they keep them around. Those with such a vain mindset, whether they are lords or ordinary people, are much more pleased to have their ideas praised rather than criticized. And even though they might ask their servant and friend to be completely honest, they will be happier if he flatters them instead of telling them the truth.
For they be in the condition that Marciall speaketh of in an epigram, unto a friend of his who required his judgment how he liked his verses, but prayed him in any wise to tell him even the very truth. To him, Marciall made answer in this wise:
For they are in the situation that Martial mentioned in an epigram to a friend who asked for his opinion on his verses, but requested him to tell the absolute truth. To him, Martial replied like this:
"The very truth of me thou dost require.
The very truth is this, my friend dear:
The very truth thou wouldst not gladly hear."
"The truth about me is what you want.
The truth is this, my dear friend:
The truth you wouldn’t want to hear."
And in good faith, uncle, the selfsame prelate that I told you my tale of—I dare be bold to swear it, I know it so surely—had one time drawn up a certain treaty that was to serve for a league between that country and a great prince. In this treaty he himself thought that he had devised his articles so wisely and composed them so well, that all the world would approve them. Thereupon, longing sore to be praised, he called unto him a friend of his, a man well learned and of good worship, and very well expert in those matters, as one who had been divers times ambassador for that country and had made many such treaties himself. When he gave him the treaty and he had read it, he asked him how he liked it, and said, "But I pray you heartily, tell me the very truth." And that he spake so heartily that the other thought he would fain have heard the truth, and in that trust he told him a fault in the treaty. And at the hearing of it he swore in great anger, "By the mass, thou art a very fool!" The other afterward told me that he would never tell him the truth again.
And honestly, uncle, the same bishop I mentioned in my story—I can confidently say I know this for sure—once drafted a treaty intended to create an alliance between that country and a powerful prince. In this treaty, he believed he had crafted the details so wisely and organized them so well that everyone would approve. Eager for praise, he called over a friend of his, a knowledgeable and respected man, very experienced in these matters, having been an ambassador for that country multiple times and having made many similar treaties himself. After giving him the treaty to read, he asked for his opinion, saying, "But please, honestly tell me the truth." He asked so earnestly that the other man thought he genuinely wanted to hear the truth, so he pointed out a flaw in the treaty. Upon hearing this, the bishop furiously exclaimed, "By God, you are such a fool!" The other man later told me he would never share his honest opinion with him again.
ANTHONY: Without question, cousin, I cannot greatly blame him. And thus they themselves make every man mock them, flatter them, and deceive them—those, I say, who are of such a vainglorious mind. For if they be content to hear the truth, let them then make much of those who tell them the truth, and withdraw their ears from them who falsely flatter them, and they shall be more truly served than with twenty requests praying men to tell them true.
ANTHONY: No doubt about it, cousin, I can’t really blame him. They bring the mockery upon themselves, inviting flattery and deception—those, I mean, who have such an arrogant mindset. If they are willing to hear the truth, they should appreciate those who speak it and ignore the ones who give them false praise. They will be better served this way than with twenty pleas asking men to be honest with them.
King Ladislaus—our Lord absolve his soul!—used much this manner among his servants. When one of them praised any deed of his or any quality in him, if he perceived that they said but the truth he would let it pass by uncontrolled. But when he saw that they set a gloss on it for his praise of their own making besides, then would he shortly say unto them, "I pray thee, good fellow, when thou sayest grace at my board, never bring in a Gloria Patri without a sicut erat. Any act that ever I did, if thou report it again to mine honour with a Gloria Patri, never report it but with a sicut erat—that is, even as it was and none otherwise. And lift me not up with lies, for I love it not." If men would use this way with them that this noble king used, it would diminish much of their false flattery.
King Ladislaus—may our Lord rest his soul!—often handled things like this with his servants. When one of them praised his actions or qualities, if he realized they were speaking the truth, he would let it slide without a word. But if he noticed they were exaggerating for their own benefit, he would quickly say to them, "I ask you, good fellow, when you say grace at my table, never include a Gloria Patri without a sicut erat. If you talk about any of my actions, when you honor me with a Gloria Patri, always report it with a sicut erat—that is, just as it was and nothing more. And don't praise me with lies, because I don't appreciate that." If people treated others the way this noble king did, it would greatly reduce their false flattery.
I can well approve that men should commend such things as they see praiseworthy in other men—keeping them within the bounds of truth—to give them the greater courage to the increase of them. For men keep still in that point one quality of children, that praise must prick them forth. But better it were to do well and look for none. Howbeit, those who cannot find it in their hearts to commend another man's good deed show themselves either envious or else of nature very cold and dull. But without question, he who putteth his pleasure in the praise of the people hath but a foolish fancy. For if his finger do but ache of a hot blain, a great many men's mouths blowing out his praise will scantly do him, among them all, so much ease as to have one boy blow on his finger!
I definitely believe that people should recognize the qualities they admire in others—while staying honest about it—to encourage those qualities to grow. People often behave like children in that they need praise to be motivated. However, it's better to do good without expecting recognition. Those who can't bring themselves to acknowledge someone else's good actions are either envious or just naturally cold and unresponsive. Without a doubt, someone who seeks validation from others is being foolish. Because if he has even the slightest pain from a sore, all the praise from others won’t help him as much as having just one person blow on his finger!
XI
Let us now consider likewise what great worldly wealth ariseth unto men by great offices and authority—to those worldly-disposed people, I say, who desire them for no better purpose. For of those who desire them for better, we shall speak after anon.
Let’s now think about how much worldly wealth comes to people through high positions and power—especially for those who only want them for superficial reasons. We’ll talk about those who have better intentions later.
The great thing that they all chiefly like therein is that they may bear a rule, command and control other men, and live uncommanded and uncontrolled themselves. And yet this commodity took I so little heed of, that I never was aware it was so great, until a good friend of ours merrily told me once that his wife once in a great anger taught it to him. For when her husband had no desire to grow greatly upward in the world, nor would labour for office of authority, and beside that forsook a right worshipful office when it was offered him, she fell in hand with him, he told me. And she all berated him, and asked him, "What will you do, that you will not put yourself forth as other folk do? Will you sit by the fire and make goslings in the ashes with a stick, as children do? Would God I were a man—look what I would do!" "Why, wife," quoth her husband, "what would you do?" "What? By God, go forward with the best! For, as my mother was wont to say—God have mercy on her soul—it is evermore better to rule than to be ruled. And therefore, by God, I would not, I warrant you, be so foolish as to be ruled where I might rule." "By my troth, wife," quoth her husband, "in this I daresay you say truth, for I never found you willing to be ruled yet."
The best part that they all mostly enjoy about it is that they can have power, command, and control over others, while living free from command and control themselves. Yet, I paid so little attention to this benefit that I never realized how significant it was until a good friend of ours cheerfully told me one time that his wife taught him this during a moment of great anger. When her husband showed no interest in climbing the social ladder, nor did he want to work for a position of authority, and on top of that, he turned down a respectable position that was offered to him, she really let him have it, he told me. She scolded him and asked, "What do you plan to do if you won’t step up like everyone else? Are you just going to sit by the fire and poke at the ashes with a stick, like kids do? If only I were a man—look at what I would accomplish!" "Well, wife," said her husband, "what would you do?" "What? Honestly, I would pursue the best opportunities! For, as my mother always said—God rest her soul—it’s always better to rule than to be ruled. So, I swear, I wouldn’t be foolish enough to be ruled when I could be in charge." "Honestly, wife," her husband replied, "I dare say you’re right, for I've never seen you willing to be ruled yet."
VINCENT: Well, uncle, I follow you now, well enough! She is indeed a stout master-woman. And in good faith, for aught that I can see, even that same womanish mind of hers is the greatest commodity that men reckon upon in offices of authority.
VINCENT: Well, uncle, I get you now, clearly! She is definitely a strong woman. And honestly, from what I can tell, even her so-called feminine mindset is the most valuable trait that people count on in positions of power.
ANTHONY: By my troth, and methinketh there are very few who attain any great commodity therein. For first there is, in every kingdom, but one who can have an office of such authority that no man may command him or control him. No officer can stand in that position but the king himself; he only, uncontrolled or uncommanded, may control and command all. Now, of all the rest, each is under him. And yet almost every one is under more commanders and controllers, too, than one. And many a man who is in a great office commandeth fewer things and less labour to many men who are under him than someone that is over him commandeth him alone.
ANTHONY: Honestly, I think there are very few who really get any real benefit from this. In every kingdom, there’s only one person who can have a position of such authority that no one can command or control him. The only one who can be in that position is the king himself; he alone, without being controlled or commanded, can control and command everyone else. Now, everyone else is under him. Yet almost everyone is also under more bosses and controllers than just one. And many people in high positions oversee fewer things and do less work for the many under them than someone above them commands them alone.
VINCENT: Yet it doth them good, uncle, that men must make courtesy to them and salute them with reverence and stand bareheaded before them, or unto some of them peradventure kneel, too.
VINCENT: But it does them good, uncle, that people have to show respect to them and greet them with honor, standing hatless in front of them, or perhaps even kneeling to some of them.
ANTHONY: Well, cousin, in some part they do but play at gleek—they receive reverence, and to their cost they pay honour again therefor. For except, as I said, a king alone, the greatest in authority under him receiveth not so much reverence from any man as according to reason he himself doth honour to the king. Nor twenty men's courtesies do him not so much pleasure as his own once kneeling doth him pain if his knee hap to be sore. And I once knew a great officer of the king's to say—and in good faith I believe he said but as he thought—that twenty men standing bareheaded before him kept not his head half so warm as to keep on his own cap. And he never took so much ease with their being bareheaded before him, as he once caught grief with a cough that came upon him by standing long bareheaded before the king.
ANTHONY: Well, cousin, in some ways they play a game—they get respect, and at their expense, they repay that honor. Because, except for the king, the highest authority under him doesn’t get as much respect from anyone as he shows to the king himself. And the kindness of twenty men doesn’t give him as much comfort as the discomfort he feels from kneeling if his knee happens to be sore. I once heard a high-ranking official of the king say—and I genuinely believe he meant what he said—that twenty men standing bareheaded in front of him didn’t keep his head as warm as wearing his own hat. And he never felt as relaxed with their heads bare before him as he did when he caught a cold from standing too long bareheaded in front of the king.
But let it be that these commodities be somewhat, such as they be. Yet then consider whether any incommodities be so joined with them that a man might almost as well lack both as have both. Goeth everything evermore as every one of them would have it? That would be as hard as to please all the people at once with one weather, since in one house the husband would have fair weather for his corn and his wife would have rain for her leeks! So those who are in authority are not all evermore of one mind, but sometimes there is variance among them, either for the respect of profit or the contention of rule, or for maintenance of causes, sundry parts for their sundry friends, and it cannot be that both the parties can have their own way. Nor often are they content who see their conclusions fail, but they take the missing of their intent ten times more displeasantly than poor men do. And this goeth not only for men of mean authority, but unto the very greatest. The princes themselves cannot have, you know, all their will. For how would it be possible, since almost every one of them would, if he could, be lord over all the rest? Then many men, under their princes in authority, are in such a position that many bear them privy malice and envy in heart. And many falsely speak them full fair and praise them with their mouth, who when there happeth any great fall unto them, bark and bite upon them like dogs.
But let's acknowledge that these products are what they are. Now consider whether there are any downsides linked to them that would make it almost as bad to have both as to lack both entirely. Do things always go the way each of them wants? That's as difficult as trying to satisfy everyone with the same weather, since in one household, the husband may want clear skies for his crops while the wife needs rain for her vegetables! Those in power don’t always agree; sometimes there’s disagreement among them, whether for profit, competing for control, or supporting different causes, each favoring their own allies, and it’s impossible for both sides to get their way. Often, they’re more upset when their plans fail than poor people are about their troubles. This applies not just to those with moderate authority, but even to the highest ranks. Even princes, as you know, can't always get what they want. How could they, when almost each of them would, if they could, want to dominate the others? Many people beneath their rule harbor hidden grudges and envy. Many speak well of them and praise them openly, but when disaster strikes, they turn on them like dogs.
Finally, there is the cost and charge, the danger and peril of war, in which their part is more than a poor man's is, since that matter dependeth more upon them. And many a poor ploughman may sit still by the fire while they must arise and walk.
Finally, there’s the cost and the risk, the danger and threat of war, which affects them more than it does a poor person, since it depends more on them. And many a poor farmer can sit quietly by the fire while they have to get up and move.
And sometimes their authority falleth by change of their master's mind. And of that we see daily, in one place or another, such examples and so many that the parable of that philosopher can lack no testimony, who likened the servants of great princes unto the counters with which men do reckon accounts. For like as that counter that standeth sometimes for a farthing is suddenly set up and standeth for a thousand pound, and afterward as soon is set down beneath to stand for a farthing again; so fareth it sometimes with those who seek the way to rise and grow up in authority by the favour of great princes—as they rise up high, so fall they down again as low.
And sometimes their authority collapses when their master's opinion changes. We see proof of this every day in various places, with so many examples that the philosopher's parable is undeniable. He compared the servants of powerful leaders to counters used for counting money. Just as a counter that sometimes represents a penny can suddenly be valued at a thousand pounds, only to be reduced back to a penny again, so it goes for those who try to gain power through the favor of influential leaders—when they rise high, they can just as easily fall back down low.
Howbeit, though a man escape all such adventures, and abide in great authority till he die, yet then at least every man must leave at last. And that which we call "at last" hath no very long time to it. Let a man reckon his years that are past of his age ere ever he can get up aloft; and let him, when he hath it first in his fist, reckon how long he shall be likely to live thereafter; and I daresay that then the most part shall have little cause to rejoice. They shall see the time likely to be so short that their honour and authority by nature shall endure, beside the manifold chances by which they may lose it sooner. And then, when they see that they must needs leave it—the thing which they did much more set their hearts upon than ever they had reasonable cause—what sorrow they take for it, that shall I not need to tell you.
However, even if a man manages to avoid all such challenges and holds great power until he dies, ultimately, everyone must leave everything behind. And what we call "in the end" doesn’t last very long. Let a man count the years he has lived before he can rise to great heights; and when he finally has success in his grasp, let him estimate how much longer he is likely to live after that. I guarantee that most will have little reason to celebrate. They will realize that the time is likely to be so short that their honor and authority, by nature, won’t last, plus there are many ways they could lose it sooner. And then, when they realize they must part with it—the very thing they valued more than they ever should have—they will certainly feel a deep sorrow for it, and that’s something I don’t need to explain to you.
And thus it seemeth unto me, cousin, in good faith, that since in the having of authority the profit is not great, and the displeasures neither small nor few; and since of the losing there are so many sundry chances and by no means a man can keep it long; and since to part from it is such a painful grief: I can see no very great cause for which, as a high worldly commodity, men should greatly desire it.
And so it seems to me, cousin, honestly, that since having authority doesn't bring much benefit and the problems are neither small nor few; and since there are so many different risks involved in losing it and no way for a person to hold onto it for long; and since letting go of it is such a painful loss: I can't see any really good reason why, as a valuable worldly thing, people should want it so badly.
XII
And thus far have we considered hitherto, in these outward goods that are called the gifts of fortune, only the slender commodity that worldly-minded men have by them. But now, if we consider further what harm to the soul they take by them who desire them only for the wretched wealth of this world, then shall we well perceive how far more happy is he who well loseth them than he who ill findeth them.
And up to this point, we've looked at these external things called the gifts of fortune only from the perspective of what worldly-minded people gain from them. But now, if we think more about the harm to the soul that those who seek them solely for the miserable wealth of this world endure, we'll see how much happier someone is who loses them well than someone who gains them poorly.
These things are such as are of their own nature indifferent—that is, of themselves neither good nor bad—but are matter that may serve to the one or the other according as men will use them. Yet need we little doubt but that for those who desire them only for their worldly pleasure and for no further godly purpose the devil shall soon turn them from things indifferent and make them things very evil. For though they be indifferent of their nature, yet cannot the use of them lightly stand indifferent, but must be determinately either good or bad. And therefore he who desireth them only for worldly pleasure, desireth them not for any good. And for better purpose than he desireth them, to better use is he not likely to put them. And therefore will he use them not unto good but consequently to evil.
These things are inherently neutral—that is, by themselves neither good nor bad—but they can be used for one or the other depending on how people choose to use them. However, we should have no doubt that for those who seek them solely for their earthly pleasure and not for any spiritual purpose, the devil will quickly twist them from neutral things into very evil ones. Even though they are neutral in nature, their use cannot remain neutral; it must ultimately be good or bad. Therefore, someone who desires them only for worldly pleasure does not desire them for any good reason. And if he has a better purpose than he actually desires, he is unlikely to actually use them for that purpose. Thus, he will end up using them not for good, but instead for evil.
And for example, first consider it in riches, and in him who longeth for them as for things of temporal commodity and not for any godly purpose. What good they shall do him, St. Paul declareth, when he writeth unto Timothy, "They that long to be rich fall into temptation and into the snare of the devil, and into many desires unprofitable and noxious, which drown men into death and into perdition." And the holy scripture saith also in the twenty-fourth chapter of the Proverbs, "He that gathereth treasures shall be shoved into the snares of death." So that whereas God saith by the mouth of St. Paul that they shall fall into the devil's snare, he saith in the other place that they shall be pushed and shoved in by violence. And of truth, while a man desireth riches not for any good godly purpose but only for worldly wealth, it must needs be that he shall have little conscience in the getting. But, by all evil ways that he can invent, shall he labour to get them. And then shall he either niggardly heap them up together, which is, as you well know, damnable; or else shall he wastefully misspend them upon worldly pomp, pride, and gluttony, with occasion of many sins more, and that is yet much more damnable.
And for example, first think about riches and those who desire them solely for temporary benefits, not for any spiritual purpose. St. Paul explains the consequences of this in his letter to Timothy, saying, "Those who want to be rich fall into temptation, a trap of the devil, and many harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction." The holy scripture also says in the twenty-fourth chapter of Proverbs, "Whoever accumulates treasures will be pushed into the snares of death." So while God, speaking through St. Paul, warns that they will fall into the devil's trap, He also indicates in another place that they will be forced in violently. In truth, when a person craves riches not for any righteous reason but only for material wealth, he will likely have little conscience about how he acquires them. By any corrupt means he can think of, he will strive to get them. Then he will either hoard them miserly, which is certainly sinful, or he will wastefully spend them on worldly luxury, pride, and gluttony, leading to many more sins, which is even more sinful.
As for fame and glory desired only for worldly pleasure, they do unto the soul inestimable harm. For they set men's hearts upon high devices and desires of such things as are immoderate and outrageous. And by help of false flatterers, they puff up a man in pride and make a brittle man—lately made of earth, that shall again shortly be laid full low in earth and there lie and rot and turn again into earth—take himself in the meantime for a god here upon earth and think to win himself to be lord of all the earth. This maketh battles between these great princes, with much trouble to much people, and great effusion of blood, and one king looking to reign in five realms, who cannot well rule one. For how many hath now this great Turk? And yet he aspireth to more. And those that he hath, he ordereth evilly—and yet he ordereth himself worst.
As for fame and glory sought only for earthly pleasure, they cause immeasurable harm to the soul. They lead people's hearts towards high ambitions and desires for things that are excessive and outrageous. With the help of false flatterers, they inflate a person's pride, making a fragile being—having just come from dust, who will soon return to dust and lie there, decay, and turn back into dust—believe himself to be a god on earth, thinking he can become the ruler of all. This creates conflicts among powerful princes, causing great trouble for many people, and resulting in a lot of bloodshed, with one king aiming to reign over five kingdoms, even though he struggles to govern one. How many does this great Turk have now? And yet he seeks even more. And the ones he has, he manages poorly—yet he manages himself even worse.
Then, offices of authority: If men desire them only for their worldly fancies, who can look that ever they shall occupy them well, and not rather abuse their authority and do thereby great hurt? For then shall they fall from indifference and maintain false suits for their friends. And they shall bear up their servants, and such as depend upon them, with bearing down of other innocent folk, who are not so able to do hurt as easy to take harm. Then the laws that are made against malefactors shall they make, as an old philosopher said, to be much like unto cobwebs, in which the little gnats and flies stick still and hang fast, but the great humble-bees break them and fly quite through. And then the laws that are made as a buckler in the defence of innocents, those shall they make serve for a sword to cut and sore wound them with—and therewith wound they their own souls sorer.
Then, positions of power: If people only want them for their own selfish desires, who can believe they will use them wisely instead of abusing their authority and causing significant harm? Because they will lose their neutrality and support false claims for their friends. They will lift up their subordinates and those who rely on them while pushing down other innocent people who aren’t as capable of causing harm but are easy targets for damage. The laws created to punish wrongdoers, as an old philosopher said, will be like cobwebs, where the small bugs get stuck but the big bumblebees break right through. And the laws that are meant to protect the innocent will be twisted into weapons to hurt them—and in doing so, they will wound their own souls even more deeply.
And thus you see, cousin, that of all these outward goods which men call the goods of fortune, there is never one that, unto those who long for it not for any godly purpose but only for their worldly welath, hath any great commodity to the body. And yet are they all, beside that, very deadly destruction unto the soul.
And so you see, cousin, that of all these external possessions that people refer to as the goods of fortune, none of them provides much benefit to those who desire them not for any meaningful purpose but only for their wealth. Yet, they are all, in addition, very harmful to the soul.
XIII
VINCENT: Verily, good uncle, this thing is so plainly true that no man can with any good reason deny it. But I think also, uncle, that no man will do so. For I see no man who will confess, for very shame, that he desireth riches, honour, renown, and offices of authority only for his worldly pleasure. For every man would fain seem as holy as a horse. And therefore will every man say—and would it were so believed, too—that he desireth these things, though for his worldly wealth a little so, yet principally to merit thereby through doing some good with them.
VINCENT: Honestly, good uncle, this is so obviously true that no one can reasonably deny it. But I also think, uncle, that no one will. I don’t see anyone who would admit, out of pure embarrassment, that they want wealth, honor, fame, and positions of power just for their own enjoyment. Everyone wants to appear as virtuous as possible. So, every person will claim—and I wish people actually believed this too—that they desire these things, perhaps a little for their own financial gain, but mainly to do some good with them.
ANTHONY: This is, cousin, very surely so, that so doth every man say. But first he who in the desire of these things hath his respect unto his worldly wealth, as you say, "but a little so," so much as he himself thinketh but a little, may soon prove a great deal too much. And many men will say so, too, who have principal respect unto their worldly commodity, and toward God little or none at all. And yet they pretend the contrary, and that unto their own harm. For "God cannot be mocked."
ANTHONY: Look, cousin, it's definitely true that everyone says this. But first, those who focus on their material wealth, as you mentioned, might think it's just a little, but what they consider little can actually end up being way too much. Many people feel the same way, prioritizing their possessions over anything related to God. Yet, they pretend otherwise, which only harms themselves. Because "God cannot be mocked."
And some peradventure know not well their own affection themselves. But there lieth more imperfection secretly in their affection than they themselves are well aware of, which only God beholdeth. And therefore saith the prophet unto God, "Mine imperfection have thine eyes beheld." And therefore the prophet prayeth, "From mine hidden sins cleanse thou me, good Lord."
And some may not fully understand their own feelings. But there's often more imperfection hidden in their feelings than they realize, which only God can see. That's why the prophet says to God, "You have seen my shortcomings." And so the prophet prays, "Cleanse me from my hidden sins, good Lord."
But now, cousin, this tribulation of the Turk: If he so persecute us for the faith that those who will forsake their faith shall keep their goods, and those shall lose their goods who will not leave their faith—lo, this manner of persecution shall try them like a touchstone. For it shall show the feigned from the true-minded, and it shall also teach them who think they mean better than they do indeed, better to discern themselves. For there are some who think they mean well, while they frame themselves a conscience, and ever keep still a great heap of superfluous substance by them, thinking ever still that they will bethink themselves upon some good deed on which they will well bestow it once—or else that their executors shall! But now, if they lie not unto themselves, but keep their goods for any good purpose to the pleasure of God indeed, then shall they, in this persecution, for the pleasure of God in keeping his faith, be glad to depart from them.
But now, cousin, this struggle with the Turk: If he persecutes us for our faith to the point that those who abandon their faith can keep their possessions, and those who refuse to abandon their faith will lose their possessions—this kind of persecution will test them like a touchstone. It will reveal the fake believers from the true ones, and it will also help those who think they have good intentions to understand themselves better. Some people believe they mean well while they create a false sense of conscience for themselves, hanging onto a lot of unnecessary stuff, always thinking they'll eventually do something good with it—or that their heirs will! But if they’re honest with themselves and keep their possessions for a true good purpose that pleases God, then during this persecution, for the love of God in maintaining their faith, they will willingly let go of those possessions.
And therefore, as for all these things—the loss, I mean, of all these outward things that men call the gifts of fortune—this is, methinketh, in this Turk's persecution for the faith, consolation great and sufficient: Every man who hath them either setteth by them for the world or for God. He who setteth by them for the world hath, as I have showed you, little profit by them to the body and great harm unto the soul. And therefore, he might well, if he were wise, reckon that he won by the loss, although he lost them but by some common cause. And much more happy can he then be, since he loseth them by such a meritorious means. And on the other hand, he who keepeth them for some good purpose, intending to bestow them for the pleasure of God, the loss of them in this Turk's persecution for keeping of the faith can be no manner of grief to him. For by so parting from them he bestoweth them in such wise unto God's pleasure that at the time when he loseth them by no way could he bestow them unto his high pleasure better. For though it would have been peradventure better to have bestowed them well before, yet since he kept them for some good purpose he would not have left them unbestowed if he had foreknown the chance. But being now prevented so by persecution that he cannot bestow them in that other good way that he would have, yet since he parteth from them because he will not part from the faith, though the devil's escheator violently take them from him, yet willingly giveth he them to God.
And so, regarding all these things—the loss of all these external things that people call the gifts of fortune—this is, I think, a great and sufficient consolation in this Turk's persecution for the faith: Every person who has them either values them for the world or for God. Those who value them for the world, as I’ve shown you, gain little benefit for the body and cause great harm to the soul. Therefore, if they were wise, they would realize that they actually gain from the loss, even if they lose them due to some ordinary reason. And they can be much happier realizing they lose them for such a meaningful cause. On the flip side, those who keep them for a good purpose, intending to use them for God's pleasure, won’t feel any grief about losing them during this Turk's persecution for maintaining the faith. By letting go of them, they are giving them in a way that pleases God, and at that moment when they lose them, they couldn’t have given them in any better way to honor Him. Even though it may have been better to have given them away earlier, since they kept them for a good reason, they wouldn't have left them unused if they had foreseen the situation. But now, being forced by persecution to give them up in a way they didn’t want to, since they are parting with them because they refuse to abandon their faith, even if the devil's agent violently takes them, they willingly offer them to God.
XIV
VINCENT: In good faith, good uncle, I can deny none of this. And indeed, unto those who were despoiled and robbed by the Turk's overrunning of the country, and all their substance movable and unmovable bereft and lost already, their persons only fled and safe, I think that these considerations—considering also that, as you lately said, their sorrow could not amend their chance—might unto them be good occasion of comfort, and cause them, as you said, to make a virtue of necessity.
VINCENT: Honestly, good uncle, I can't deny any of this. And for those who were stripped bare and robbed by the Turk's invasion, losing everything they owned, both movable and immovable, with only their lives to escape, I think these thoughts—especially since you just mentioned that their grief won’t change their situation—could provide them with some comfort and help them, as you said, to make the best out of a tough situation.
But in the case, uncle, that we now speak of, they have yet their substance untouched in their own hands, and the keeping or the losing shall both hang in their own hands, by the Turk's offer, upon the retaining or the renouncing of the Christian faith. Here, uncle, I find it, as you said, that this temptation is most sore and most perilous. For I fear me that we shall find few of such as have much to lose who shall find it in their hearts so suddenly to forsake their goods, with all those other things before rehearsed on which their worldly wealth dependeth.
But in this case, uncle, that we’re discussing, they still have their property in their own control, and whether they keep it or lose it will depend solely on the Turk’s offer, based on whether they choose to maintain or give up the Christian faith. Here, uncle, I see what you meant; this temptation is incredibly intense and dangerous. I’m worried that we’ll find few people with a lot to lose who will suddenly have the courage to abandon their possessions, along with all the other things previously mentioned that their worldly wealth relies on.
ANTHONY: That fear I much, cousin, too. But thereby shall it well appear, as I said, that, seemed they never so good and virtuous before, and flattered they themselves with never so gay a gloss of good and gracious purpose that they kept their goods for, yet were their hearts inwardly in the deep sight of God not sound and sure such as they should be (and as peradventure some had themselves thought they were) but like a puff-ring of Paris—hollow, light, and counterfeit indeed.
ANTHONY: I'm afraid of that too, cousin. But it will show clearly, as I mentioned, that even if they seemed really good and virtuous before, and even if they flattered themselves with a cheerful appearance of good intentions while hoarding their wealth, their hearts were not truly sound and secure in the eyes of God as they should be (and perhaps some had thought they were), but instead were like a puff pastry from Paris—hollow, light, and fake.
And yet, they being even such, this would I fain ask one of them. And I pray you, cousin, take you his person upon you, and in this case answer for him. "What hindereth you," would I ask, "your Lordship," (for we will take no small man for an example in this part, nor him who would have little to lose, for methinketh such a one who would cast away God for a little, would be so far from all profit, that he would not be worth talking with). "What hindereth you," I say, therefore, "that you be not gladly content, without any deliberation at all, in this kind of persecution, rather than to leave your faith, to let go all that ever you have at once?"
And yet, even with that being the case, there’s something I would like to ask one of them. And I ask you, cousin, to take on his role and answer for him in this situation. "What stops you," I would ask, "your Lordship," (since we won’t use a minor figure as an example here, nor someone who has little to lose, because it seems to me that someone who would abandon God for a small amount would be so lacking in value that they wouldn't even be worth a conversation). "What stops you," I say, then, "from being completely willing, without any hesitation, to endure this kind of persecution, rather than abandon your faith and lose everything you have all at once?"
VINCENT: Since you put it unto me, uncle, to make the matter more plain, that I should play that great man's part who is so wealthy and hath so much to lose, albeit that I cannot be very sure of another man's mind, nor of what another man would say, yet as far as mine own mind can conjecture, I shall answer in his person what I think would be his hindrance. And therefore to your question I answer that there hindereth me the thing that you yourself may lightly guess: the losing of the many commodities which I now have—riches and substance, lands and great possessions of inheritance, with great rule and authority here in my country. All of which things the great Turk granteth me to keep still in peace and have them enhanced, too, if I will forsake the faith of Christ. Yea, I may say to you, I have a motion secretly made me further, to keep all this yet better cheap; that is, not to be compelled utterly to forsake Christ nor all the whole Christian faith, but only some such parts of it as may not stand with Mahomet's law. And only granting Mahomet for a true prophet and serving the Turk truly in his wars against all Christian kings, I shall not be hindered to praise Christ also, and to call him a good man, and worship and serve him too.
VINCENT: Since you asked me, uncle, to clarify things, that I should represent that wealthy man who has so much at stake, even though I can't be certain of another person's thoughts or what they might say, I will respond as I believe he would regarding what holds him back. So, to your question, I would say the thing that stops me is something you can easily guess: the risk of losing all the advantages I currently have—wealth, property, land, significant inheritances, and considerable power and influence in my country. All of these things the great Turk allows me to keep in peace and even to enhance if I abandon the Christian faith. In fact, I can tell you that I have received a private suggestion to secure these benefits more easily; that is, I wouldn't have to completely abandon Christ or the entire Christian faith, but only certain aspects that conflict with Mohammed's laws. By merely acknowledging Mohammed as a true prophet and serving the Turk faithfully in his wars against all Christian kings, I wouldn’t be prevented from praising Christ too, calling him a good man, and worshiping and serving him as well.
ANTHONY: Nay, nay, my lord—Christ hath not so great need of your Lordship as, rather than to lose your service, he would fall at such covenants with you as to take your service at halves, to serve him and his enemy both! He hath given you plain warning already by St. Paul that he will have in your service no parting-fellow: "What fellowship is there between light and darkness? Between Christ and Belial?" And he hath also plainly told you himself by his own mouth, "No man can serve two lords at once." He will have you believe all that he telleth you, and do all that he biddeth you, and forbear all that he forbiddeth you, without any manner of exception. Break one of his commandments, and you break all. Forsake one point of his faith, and you forsake all, as for any thanks that you get of him for the rest. And therefore, if you devise, as it were, indentures between God and you—what you will do for him and what you will not do, as though he should hold himself content with such service of yours as you yourself care to appoint him—if you make, I say, such indentures, you shall seal both the parts yourself, and you get no agreement thereto from him.
ANTHONY: No, my lord—Christ doesn't need your Lordship as much that, rather than lose your service, he would agree to share you between him and his enemy! He has already given you a clear warning through St. Paul that he does not want any divided loyalty from you: "What fellowship can light have with darkness? Between Christ and Belial?" He has also explicitly told you himself, "No one can serve two masters at the same time." He expects you to believe everything he says, do everything he commands, and avoid everything he forbids, without any exceptions. Break one of his commandments, and you break them all. Reject one part of his faith, and you reject everything, as far as any thanks you might get from him for the rest. So, if you try to create an agreement between God and yourself—deciding what you will do for him and what you won’t do, as if he should be satisfied with whatever service you choose to offer him—if you draw up such agreements, you will have to seal both parts yourself, and you won’t get any acceptance from him.
And this I say: Though the Turk would make such an appointment with you as you speak of, and would, when he had made it, keep it—whereas he would not, I warrant you, leave you so when he had once brought you so far forth. But he would, little by little, ere he left you, make you deny Christ altogether and take Mahomet in his stead. And so doth he in the beginning, when he will not have you believe him to be God. For surely, if he were not God, he would be no good man either, since he plainly said he was God. But through he would go never so far forth with you, yet Christ will, as I said, not take your service by halves, but will that you shall love him with all your whole heart. And because, while he was living here fifteen hundred years ago, he foresaw this mind of yours that you have now, with which you would fain serve him in some such fashion that you might keep your worldly substance still, but rather forsake his service than put all your substance from you, he telleth you plainly fifteen hundred years ago with his own mouth that he will have no such service of you, saying, "You cannot serve both God and your riches together."
And this is what I say: Even if the Turk tried to make the deal you mentioned and actually stuck to it—though I doubt he would let you go once you got that far—he would gradually make you deny Christ and accept Mahomet instead. This is how he operates from the start, since he doesn’t want you to see him as God. Because if he isn't God, then he can't be a good man either, since he clearly claimed to be God. But no matter how far he may take you, Christ, as I said, won't accept half-hearted service; he wants you to love him with all your heart. And because he lived fifteen hundred years ago and saw the mindset you have now—where you want to serve him but keep your material possessions—he explicitly told you, through his own words, that he won’t accept such service, saying, "You cannot serve both God and your riches."
And therefore, this thing being established for a plain conclusion, which you must needs grant if you have faith—and if you be gone from that ground of faith already, then is all our disputation, you know, at an end. For how should you then rather lose your goods than forsake your faith, if you have lost your faith and let it go already? This point, I say, therefore, being put first for a ground, between us both twain agreed, that you have yet the faith still and intend to keep it always still in your heart, and are only in doubt whether you will lose all your worldly substance rather than forsake your faith in your word alone; now shall I reply to the point of your answer, wherein you tell me the lothness of the loss and the comfort of the keeping hinder you from forgoing your goods and move you rather to forsake your faith.
And so, with this being established as a clear conclusion, you have to accept it if you believe—and if you've already moved away from that belief, then our discussion is over. After all, how could you choose to lose your possessions rather than give up your faith if you've already lost your faith? This point, I emphasize, serves as a foundation for both of us to agree that you still have faith and plan to keep it in your heart, and you're just unsure whether you'd rather lose all your material wealth than abandon your faith based on just words. Now, I will respond to your concern, where you mention that the fear of losing your things and the comfort of retaining them makes you hesitant to give up your goods and tempts you to abandon your faith instead.
I let pass all that I have spoken of the small commodity of them unto your body and of the great harm that the having of them doth to your soul. And since the promise of the Turk, made unto you for the keeping of them, is the thing that moveth you and maketh you thus to doubt, I ask you first whereby you know that, when you have done all that he will have you do against Christ, to the harm of your soul—whereby know you, I say, that he will keep you his promise in these things that he promiseth you concerning the retaining of your well-beloved worldly wealth, for the pleasure of your body?
I’ve let go of everything I’ve said about how your attachment to those small possessions affects your body and the serious damage it does to your soul. And since the promise made by the Turk to ensure you keep them is what’s influencing you and causing your doubt, I ask you first how you know that, after doing everything he asks you to do against Christ, which harms your soul—how do you know that he will actually keep his promise regarding the retention of your beloved worldly wealth, just for your bodily pleasure?
VINCENT: What surety can a man have of such a great prince except his promise, which for his own honour it cannot become him to break?
VINCENT: What guarantee can a man have from such a powerful prince besides his promise, which it would not be in the prince's interest to break for his own reputation?
ANTHONY: I have known him, and his father before him too, to break more promises than five, as great as this is that he should here make with you. Who shall come and cast it in his teeth, and tell him it is a shame for him to be so fickle and so false of his promise? And then what careth he for those words that he knoweth well he shall never hear? Not very much, though they were told him too!
ANTHONY: I've known him, and his father before him, to break more promises than five, especially the big one he’s making with you here. Who’s gonna come and throw it in his face, telling him it’s shameful to be so unreliable and false to his word? And he doesn’t care about words he knows he’ll never hear. Not at all, even if someone did tell him!
If you might come afterward and complain your grief unto his own person yourself, you should find him as shamefast as a friend of mine, a merchant, once found the Sultan of Syria. Being certain years about his merchandise in that country, he gave to the Sultan a great sum of money for a certain office for him there for the while. But he had scantly granted him this and put it in his hand when, ere ever it was worth aught to him, the Sultan suddenly sold it to another of his own sect, and put our Hungarian out. Then came he to him and humbly put him in remembrance of his grant, spoken with his own mouth and signed with his own hand. Thereunto the Sultan answered him, with a grim countenance, "I will have thee know, good-for-nothing, that neither my mouth nor mine hand shall be master over me, to bind all my body at their pleasure. But I will be lord and master over them both, that whatsoever the one say and the other write, I will be at mine own liberty to do what I like myself, and ask them both no leave. And therefore, go get thee hence out of my countries, knave!" Think you now, my lord, that Sultan and this Turk, being both of one false sect, you may not find them both alike false of their promise?
If you come later and complain to him directly about your pain, you'll find him as shameful as a friend of mine, a merchant, once found the Sultan of Syria. After spending several years in that country dealing with his merchandise, he gave the Sultan a large amount of money for a specific position there for a while. But just as he had barely granted it to him and handed it over, the Sultan suddenly sold it to someone else of his own kind before it was even useful to the merchant, and dismissed our Hungarian. The merchant then approached him and humbly reminded him of the promise he had made with his own words and signed with his own hand. The Sultan responded with a grim look, "Let me make it clear, good-for-nothing, that neither my mouth nor my hand will control me, binding my entire self to their whims. Instead, I will be the master of both, so whatever one says or the other writes, I will be free to do as I please without asking either of them for permission. So go on, get out of my lands, you scoundrel!" Do you think now, my lord, that the Sultan and this Turk, both belonging to the same deceitful sect, are not equally deceitful in their promises?
VINCENT: That must I needs jeopard, for other surety can there none be had.
VINCENT: I have to take that risk, because there’s no other safety to be had.
ANTHONY: An unwise jeoparding, to put your soul in peril of damnation for the keeping of your bodily pleasures, and yet without surety to jeopard them too!
ANTHONY: It's reckless to risk your soul's damnation just to hold onto your physical pleasures, especially when there's no guarantee that you'll be able to keep them!
But yet go a little further, lo. Suppose me that you might be very sure that the Turk would break no promise with you. Are you then sure enough to retain all your substance still?
But let's think a bit more. Imagine that you can be completely sure the Turk won’t break any promises with you. Are you really confident enough to keep all your assets intact?
VINCENT: Yea, then.
Yeah, then.
ANTHONY: What if a man should ask you how long?
ANTHONY: What if a guy asked you how long?
VINCENT: How long? As long as I live.
VINCENT: How long? As long as I'm alive.
ANTHONY: Well, let it be so, then. But yet, as far as I can see, though the great Turk favour you never so much and let you keep your goods as long as ever you live, yet if it hap that you be this day fifty years old, all the favour he can show you cannot make you one day younger tomorrow. But every day shall you wax older than the day before, and then within a while must you, for all his favour, lose all.
ANTHONY: Well, let it be. But as far as I can see, even if the great Turk favors you and lets you keep your possessions for as long as you live, if today you turn fifty years old, no amount of favor can make you younger tomorrow. Each day, you will grow older than the day before, and eventually, despite all his support, you will lose everything.
VINCENT: Well, a man would be glad, for all that, to be sure not to lack while he liveth.
VINCENT: Well, a man would be happy, for all that, to make sure he doesn’t go without while he’s alive.
ANTHONY: Well, then, if the great Turk give you your goods, can there then in all your life none other take them from you again?
ANTHONY: Well, if the great Turk gives you your goods, can anyone ever take them from you again in your whole life?
VINCENT: Verily, I suppose not.
VINCENT: Honestly, I don’t think so.
ANTHONY: May he not lose this country again unto Christian men, and you, with the taking of this way, fall in the same peril then that you would now eschew?
ANTHONY: I hope he doesn't lose this country to Christians again, and that by taking this path, you won't end up in the same danger you’re trying to avoid now?
VINCENT: Forsooth, I think that if he get it once, he will never lose it after again in our days.
VINCENT: Honestly, I think that if he gets it once, he'll never lose it again in our time.
ANTHONY: Yes, by God's grace. But yet if he lose it after our day, there goeth your children's inheritance away again! But be it now that he could never lose it; could none take your substance from you then?
ANTHONY: Yes, by God's grace. But if he loses it after our day, then your children's inheritance is gone again! But let’s say he could never lose it; could anyone still take your belongings from you then?
VINCENT: No, in good faith, none.
VINCENT: No, seriously, none.
ANTHONY: No, none at all? Not God?
ANTHONY: No, not at all? Not even God?
VINCENT: God? Why, yes, perdy. Who doubteth of that?
VINCENT: God? Of course. Who doubts that?
ANTHONY: Who? Marry, he who doubteth whether there be any God or no. And that there lacketh not some such, the prophet testifieth where he said, "The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God." With the mouth the most foolish will forbear to say it unto other folk, but in the heart they forbear not to say it softly to themselves. And I fear me there be many more such fools than every man would think. And they would not hesitate to say it openly, too, if they forbore it not more for dread or for shame of men than for any fear of God. But now those who are so frantic foolish as to think there were no God, and yet in their words confess him, though (as St. Paul saith) in their deeds they deny him—we shall let them pass till it please God to show himself unto them, either inwardly, in time, by his merciful grace, or else outwardly, but over-late for them, by his terrible judgment.
ANTHONY: Who? Well, it’s the person who doubts whether there’s a God or not. And the prophet confirms that there are indeed some like this when he said, "The fool has said in his heart, there is no God." When speaking to others, the most foolish will hold back from saying it aloud, but in their hearts, they don’t hesitate to mutter it quietly to themselves. I fear there are many more of these fools than anyone would like to believe. They wouldn't hold back from saying it openly either, if they were not more afraid of what people think than of any fear of God. But now, those who are foolish enough to think there is no God, yet in their words confess Him, although (as St. Paul says) in their actions they deny Him—we will let them be until God chooses to reveal Himself to them, either internally, in time, through His merciful grace, or externally, but too late for them, through His terrible judgment.
But unto you, my Lord, since you believe and confess, as a wise man should, that though the Turk keep you his promise in letting you keep your substance, because you do him pleasure in the forsaking of your faith, yet God, whose faith you forsake, and thereby do him displeasure, may so take them from you that the great Turk, with all the power he hath, is not able to keep you them—why will you be so unwise with the loss of your soul to please the great Turk for your goods, since you know well that God whom you displease therewith may take them from you too?
But to you, my Lord, since you believe and admit, as a wise person would, that even if the Turk keeps his promise to let you keep your possessions because you please him by abandoning your faith, still God, whose faith you abandon and thus offend, might take everything from you in such a way that the great Turk, with all his power, cannot prevent it—why would you choose to be so foolish as to risk your soul to please the great Turk for your belongings, knowing full well that the God you’re offending might take them away from you too?
Besides this, since you believe there is a God, you cannot but believe also that the great Turk cannot take your goods from you without his will or sufferance, no more than the devil could from Job. And think you then that, if he will suffer the Turk to take away your goods albeit that by the keeping and confessing of his faith you please him, he will, when you displease him by forsaking his faith, suffer you to rejoice or enjoy any benefit of those goods that you get or keep thereby?
Besides this, since you believe there is a God, you can’t help but believe that the great Turk cannot take your possessions from you without his will or consent, just like the devil couldn’t take anything from Job. And do you really think that if God allows the Turk to take your goods even though you please him by keeping and confessing your faith, he will let you enjoy or benefit from those goods when you displease him by abandoning your faith?
VINCENT: God is gracious, and though men offend him, yet he suffereth them many times to live in prosperity long after.
VINCENT: God is gracious, and even though people offend Him, He often allows them to live in prosperity for a long time afterwards.
ANTHONY: Long after? Nay, by my troth, that doth he no man! For how can that be, that he should suffer you to live in prosperity long after, when your whole life is but short in all-together, and either almost half of it or more than half, you think yourself, I daresay, spent out already before? Can you burn out half a short candle, and then have a long one left of the rest?
ANTHONY: Long after? No way, I swear no one does that! How could it be that he lets you enjoy a good life for a long time when your entire life is pretty short overall, and you probably feel like you've already spent almost half of it or even more? Can you burn half of a short candle and still have a long one left over?
There cannot in this world be a worse mind than for a man to delight and take comfort in any commodity that he taketh by sinful means. For it is the very straight way toward the taking of boldness and courage in sin, and finally to falling into infidelity and thinking that God careth not or regardeth not what things men do here nor of what mind we be. But unto such-minded folk speaketh holy scripture in this wise: "Say not, I have sinned and yet there hath happed me none harm, for God suffereth before he strike." But, as St. Austine saith, the longer he tarrieth ere he strike, the sorer is the stroke when he striketh.
There can’t be a worse mindset than for someone to find joy and comfort in things they acquire through sinful means. This is a direct path to becoming bold and confident in sin, eventually leading to disbelief and the notion that God doesn’t care or pay attention to what we do or how we think. However, the holy scripture advises such people: "Don’t say, I have sinned and nothing bad has happened to me, for God allows time before he punishes." But, as St. Augustine says, the longer He waits to punish, the harder the punishment will be when it comes.
And therefore, if you will do well, reckon yourself very sure that when you deadly displease God for the getting or the keeping of your goods, God shall not suffer those goods to do you good. But either he shall shortly take them from you, or else suffer you to keep them for a little while to your more harm and afterward, when you least look for it, take you away from them.
And so, if you want to do right, understand that if you seriously upset God for the sake of gaining or holding onto your possessions, God won’t let those possessions benefit you. Either He will quickly take them away from you, or He will allow you to keep them for a while, only for your own detriment, and then, when you least expect it, He will take you away from them.
And then, what a heap of heaviness will there enter into your heart, when you shall see that you shall so suddenly go from your goods and leave them here in the earth in one place, and that your body shall be put in the earth in another place, and—which then shall be the most heaviness of all—when you shall fear (and not without great cause) that your soul first forthwith, and after that at the final judgment your body, shall be driven down deep toward the centre of the earth into the fiery pit and dungeon of the devil of hell, there to tarry in torment, world without end! What goods of this world can any man imagine, the pleasure and commodity of which could be such in a thousand years as to be able to recompense that intolerable pain that there is to be suffered in one year? Yea, or in one day or one hour, either? And then what a madness is it, for the poor pleasure of your worldly goods of so few years, to cast yourself both body and soul into the everlasting fire of hell, which is not diminished by the amount of a moment by lying there the space of a hundred thousand years?
And then, what a heavy burden will fill your heart when you realize that you will suddenly leave your possessions behind on earth, and your body will be buried in one place while your stuff stays here? The heaviest thought of all will be when you fear (and rightfully so) that your soul will first be sent straight down, and then at the final judgment, your body too, deep down to the center of the earth into the fiery pit and dungeon of hell, where you will suffer in torment forever! What worldly goods can anyone possibly imagine that would bring enough pleasure and benefit over a thousand years to make up for that unbearable pain endured for just one year? Or even for a day or an hour? And then, how insane is it to trade the fleeting pleasure of your temporary possessions for the eternal fire of hell, which won't be lessened at all by lying there for a hundred thousand years?
And therefore our Saviour, in few words, concluded and confuted all these follies of those who, for the short use of this worldly substance, forsake him and his faith and sell their souls unto the devil for ever. For he saith, "What availeth it a man if he won all the whole world, and lost his soul?" This would be, methinketh, cause and occasion enough, to him who had never so much part of this world in his hand, to be content rather to lose it all than for the retaining or increasing of his worldly goods to lose and destroy his soul.
And so, our Savior summed up and refuted all the nonsense of those who, for a short time with this temporary wealth, abandon him and his faith, selling their souls to the devil forever. He said, "What does it benefit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?" This should be enough reason for anyone, even if they had a tiny piece of this world, to be willing to give it all up rather than lose or destroy their soul for the sake of keeping or increasing their material possessions.
VINCENT: This is, good uncle, in good faith very true. And what other thing any of them who would not for this be content, have to allege in reason for the defence of their folly, that can I not imagine. I care not in this matter to play the part any longer, but I pray God give me the grace to play the contrary part in deed. And I pray that I may never, for any goods or substance of this wretched world, forsake my faith toward God either in heart or tongue. And I trust in his great goodness that so I never shall.
VINCENT: This is, good uncle, honestly very true. And what else could anyone who wouldn’t be satisfied with this possibly argue to justify their foolishness? I can't even imagine. I'm done playing this role, but I pray that God gives me the strength to genuinely act the opposite way. And I hope that I will never, for any riches or possessions of this miserable world, abandon my faith in God, either in my heart or in my words. I trust in His great goodness that I never will.
XV
ANTHONY: Methinketh, cousin, that this persecution shall not only, as I said before, try men's hearts when it cometh and make them know their own affections—whether they have a corrupt greedy covetous mind or not—but also the very fame and expectation of it may teach them this lesson, ere ever the thing fall upon them itself. And this may be to their no little fruit, if they have the wit and the grace to take it in time while they can. For now may they find sure places to lay their treasure in, so that all the Turk's army shall never find it out.
ANTHONY: I believe, cousin, that this persecution will not only, as I mentioned before, test people's hearts when it arrives and help them recognize their own feelings—whether they have a greedy and selfish mindset or not—but also the very idea and anticipation of it might teach them this lesson before it actually happens. This could be quite beneficial for them if they have the sense and the ability to take advantage of it in time while they still can. For now, they can find secure places to store their treasures so that none of the Turk's army will ever uncover them.
VINCENT: Marry, uncle, that way they will not forget, I warrant you, as near as their wits will serve them. But yet have I known some who have ere this thought that they had hid their money safe and sure enough, digging it full deep in the ground, and yet have missed it when they came again and found it digged out and carried away to their hands.
VINCENT: Sure, uncle, that way they won’t forget, I promise you, as much as their brains can manage. But I’ve seen some people who thought they had buried their money safely and securely, digging it deep in the ground, and yet when they returned, they found it dug up and taken away.
ANTHONY: Nay, from their hands, I think you would say. And it was no marvel. For some such have I known, too, but they have hid their goods foolishly in such place as they were well warned before that they should not. And that were they warned by him whom they well knew for such a one as knew well enough what would come of it.
ANTHONY: No, I think you would say it was from their hands. And it's not surprising. I've known some like that too, but they foolishly hid their valuables in places they were clearly warned against beforehand. And they were warned by someone they knew very well knew exactly what would happen as a result.
VINCENT: Then were they more than mad. But did he tell them too where they should have hid it, to make it sure?
VINCENT: So they were more than just crazy. But did he also tell them where they should have hidden it to keep it safe?
ANTHONY: Yea, by St. Mary, did he! For else he would have told them but half a tale. But he told them a whole tale, bidding them that they should in no wise hide their treasure in the ground. And he showed them a good cause, for there thieves dig it out and steal it away.
ANTHONY: Yeah, by St. Mary, he definitely did! Otherwise, he would have only shared part of the story. But he told them everything, warning them that they shouldn’t bury their treasure in the ground. He gave them a solid reason for this, since thieves dig it up and steal it.
VINCENT: Why, where should they hide it, then, said he? For thieves may hap to find it out in any place.
VINCENT: Why, where should they hide it, then? Thieves might stumble upon it anywhere.
ANTHONY: Forsooth, he counselled them to hide their treasure in heaven and there lay it up, for there it shall lie safe. For thither, he said, there can no thief come, till he have left his theft and become a true man first. And he who gave this counsel knew well enough what he said, for it was our Saviour himself, who in the sixth chapter of St. Matthew saith, "Hoard not up your treasures in earth, where the rust and the moth fret it out and where thieves dig it out and steal it away. But hoard up your treasures in heaven, where neither the rust nor the moth fret them out, and where thieves dig them not out nor steal them away. For where thy treasure is, there is thine heart too."
ANTHONY: Truly, he advised them to store their treasure in heaven and keep it safe there, because that's where it will be secure. He said that no thief can reach it until he has left his life of crime and become an honest person first. The one who gave this advice knew what he was talking about, as it was our Savior himself, who in the sixth chapter of St. Matthew says, "Don't store up your treasures on earth, where rust and moths destroy them and where thieves break in and steal them. Instead, store up your treasures in heaven, where neither rust nor moths destroy them, and where thieves do not break in or steal them. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also."
If we would well consider these words of our Saviour Christ, methinketh we should need no more counsel at all, nor no more comfort either, concerning the loss of our temporal substance in this Turk's persecution for the faith. For here our Lord in these words teacheth us where we may lay up our substance safe, before the persecution come. If we put it into the poor men's bosoms, there shall it lie safe, for who would go search a beggar's bag for money? If we deliver it to the poor for Christ's sake, we deliver it unto Christ himself. And then what persecutor can there be, so strong as to take it out of his hand?
If we really think about these words of our Savior Christ, I believe we wouldn't need any more advice or comfort regarding the loss of our material wealth during this Turkish persecution for our faith. Here, our Lord teaches us where we can securely store our belongings before the persecution arrives. If we give it to the poor, it will be safe because who would search a beggar's bag for money? When we give to the poor for Christ's sake, we're actually giving it to Christ himself. And what persecutor could possibly be strong enough to take it from Him?
VINCENT: These things, uncle, are undoubtedly so true that no man can with words wrestle therewith. But yet ever there hangeth in a man's heart a lothness to lack a living!
VINCENT: These things, uncle, are definitely so true that no one can argue against them with words. But still, there’s always a reluctance in a person’s heart to be without a livelihood!
[YOU ARE HERE]
ANTHONY: There doth indeed, in theirs who either never or but seldom hear any good counsel against it, or who, when they hear it, hearken to it but as they would to an idle tale, rather for a pastime or for the sake of manners than for any substantial intent and purpose to follow good advice and take any fruit by it. But verily, if we would lay not only our ear but also our heart to it, and consider that the saying of our Saviour Christ is not a poet's fable or a harper's song but the very holy word of almighty God himself, we would be full sore ashamed of ourselves—and well we might! And we would be full sorry too, when we felt in our affection those words to have in our hearts no more strength and weight but what we remain still of the same dull mind as we did before we heard them.
ANTHONY: There are definitely people who either never hear good advice against it or only hear it occasionally. When they do hear it, they treat it like a boring story, more for entertainment or politeness than with any real intention to follow the advice and gain anything from it. But honestly, if we would not only listen but also pay attention with our hearts, and remember that our Savior Christ's words aren't just a poet's tale or a song from a bard but the very holy word of Almighty God, we would feel quite ashamed of ourselves—and rightly so! We would also regret it when we realize that those words hold no more power and meaning in our hearts than they did when we were still in the same indifferent mindset as before we heard them.
This manner of ours, in whose breasts the great good counsel of God no better settleth nor taketh no better root, may well declare to us that the thorns and briars and brambles of our worldly substance grow so thick and spring up so high in the ground of our hearts that they strangle, as the Gospel saith, the word of God that was sown therein. And therefore is God a very good lord unto us, when he causeth, like a good husbandman, his folk to come on the field—for the persecutors are his folk, to this purpose—and with their hooks and their stocking-irons to grub up these wicked weeds and bushes of our earthly substance and carry them quite away from us, that the word of God sown in our hearts may have room there, and a glade round about for the warm sun of grace to come to it and make it grow. For surely those words of our Saviour shall we find full true, "Where thy treasure is, there is also thine heart." If we lay up our treasure in earth, in earth shall be our hearts. If we send our treasure into heaven, in heaven shall we have our hearts. And surely, the greatest comfort any man can have in his tribulation is to have his heart in heaven.
Our way of being, in which the good counsel of God has no solid place or deep roots, shows us that the thorns, briars, and brambles of our worldly possessions grow so thick and rise so high in our hearts that they choke, as the Gospel puts it, the word of God planted within us. That’s why God is truly a good lord to us, as he sends, like a skilled farmer, his people into the field—for the persecutors are indeed his people for this purpose—and with their tools, they clear away these harmful weeds and bushes of our earthly concerns, taking them far from us, so that the word of God planted in our hearts has space to grow, and a clearing around it for the warm sun of grace to shine down and nurture it. Surely, we will find our Savior’s words to be absolutely true: "Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also." If we store our treasure in the earth, our hearts will be in the earth. If we send our treasure to heaven, our hearts will be in heaven. And truly, the greatest comfort anyone can have in their troubles is to have their heart in heaven.
If thine heart were indeed out of this world and in heaven, all the kinds of torments that all this world could devise could put thee to no pain here. Let us then send our hearts hence thither in such a manner as we may, by sending hither our worldly substance hence. And let us never doubt but we shall, that once done, find our hearts so conversant in heaven, with the glad consideration of our following the gracious counsel of Christ, that the comfort of his Holy Spirit, inspired in us for that, shall mitigate, diminish, assuage, and (in a manner) quench the great furious fervour of the pain that we shall happen to have by his loving sufferance of our further merit in our tribulation.
If your heart were truly out of this world and in heaven, all the torments that this world could create wouldn't cause you any pain here. So let's send our hearts there in whatever way we can, while sending our worldly possessions away. And let's never doubt that, once we do this, we will find our hearts so engaged in heaven, joyfully reflecting on how we followed Christ's gracious advice, that the comfort of His Holy Spirit, inspired in us for this purpose, will ease, lessen, calm, and (in a way) quench the intense heat of the pain we might experience due to His loving allowance of our ongoing growth in our struggles.
If we saw that we should be within a while driven out of this land, and fain to fly into another, we would think that a man were mad who would not be content to forbear his goods here for the while and send them before him into that land where he saw he should live all the rest of his life. So may we verily think yet ourselves much more mad—seeing that we are sure it cannot be long ere we shall be sent, spite of our teeth, out of this world—if the fear of a little lack or the love to see our goods here about us and the lothness to part from them for this little while that we may keep them here, shall be able to keep us from the sure sending them before us into the other world. For we may be sure to live there wealthily with them if we send them thither, or else shortly leave them here behind us and then stand in great jeopardy there to live wretches for ever.
If we realized that we were going to be driven out of this land soon and forced to flee to another, we would think someone was crazy for not wanting to temporarily leave their possessions here and send them ahead to the place where they knew they would live for the rest of their lives. Similarly, we might honestly consider ourselves even more foolish—realizing that it won’t be long before we are, whether we like it or not, sent out of this world—if the fear of a little loss or the desire to keep our belongings here, along with our reluctance to part with them for a short time, can prevent us from sending them ahead to the next world. If we send our possessions there, we can be sure to live well with them, or we can leave them behind and risk living in misery forever.
VINCENT: In good faith, good uncle, methinketh that concerning the loss of these outward things, these considerations are so sufficient comforts, that for mine own part I would methinketh desire no more, save only grace well to remember them.
VINCENT: Honestly, good uncle, I think that when it comes to losing these material things, these thoughts are such enough comfort that I wouldn't want anything more, except perhaps the grace to remember them well.
XVI
ANTHONY: Much less than this may serve, cousin, with calling and trusting upon God's help, without which much more than this cannot serve. But the fervour of the Christian faith so sore fainteth nowadays and decayeth, coming from hot unto luke-warm and from luke-warm almost to key-cold, that men must now be fain to lay many dry sticks to it, as to a fire that is almost out, and use much blowing at it.
ANTHONY: Even a little bit less than this could be enough, cousin, if we call on and trust in God's help, which is necessary since no amount more than this will do without it. However, the passion for the Christian faith has really weakened these days; it’s gone from fiery to lukewarm and almost to freezing, so people now have to pile on a lot of dry sticks, like a fire that's nearly gone out, and blow on it a lot to get it going again.
But else I think, by my troth, that unto a warm faithful man one thing alone, of which we have spoken yet no word, would be comfort enough in this kind of persecution, against the loss of all his goods.
But otherwise, I truly believe that for a warm and loyal man, one thing we haven't yet mentioned would be comforting enough in this kind of persecution, despite losing all his possessions.
VINCENT: What thing may that be, uncle?
VINCENT: What could that be, uncle?
ANTHONY: In good faith, cousin, even the bare remembrance of the poverty that our Saviour willingly suffered for us. For I verily suppose that if there were a great king who had so tender love for a servant of his that he had, to help him out of danger, forsaken and lost all his worldly wealth and royalty and become poor and needy for his sake, that servant could scantly be found who would be of such a base unnatural heart that if he himself came afterward to some substance he would not with better will lose it all again than shamefully to forsake such a master.
ANTHONY: Honestly, cousin, just thinking about the poverty our Savior willingly endured for us is enough. I truly believe that if there were a great king who loved his servant so deeply that he gave up all his wealth and status to help him out of danger, it would be hard to find a servant with such a low and unnatural heart that if he later came into some wealth, he wouldn't willingly give it all up again rather than betray such a master.
And therefore, as I say, I surely suppose that if we would well remember and inwardly consider the great goodness of our Saviour toward us, when we were not yet his poor sinful servants but rather his adversaries and his enemies, and what wealth of this world he willingly forsook for our sakes—for he was indeed universal king of this world, and so having the power in his own hand to have used it if he had wished, instead of which, to make us rich in heaven, he lived here in neediness and poverty all his life and neither would have authority nor keep either lands or goods. If we would remember this, the deep consideration and earnest advisement of this one point alone would be able to make any true Christian man or woman well content rather for his sake in return to give up all that ever God hath lent them (and lent them he hath, all that they have) than unkindly and unfaithfully to forsake him. And him they forsake if, for fear, they forsake the confessing of his Christian faith.
And so, as I said, I truly believe that if we really remember and reflect on the great goodness of our Savior towards us, when we were not yet His poor sinful servants but rather His adversaries and enemies, and what wealth of this world He willingly gave up for our sake—for He was indeed the universal king of this world and had the power to use it if He wanted—yet, to make us rich in heaven, He lived in need and poverty throughout His life and chose not to have authority or keep lands or possessions. If we could remember this, the deep thought and serious consideration of this one point alone would be enough to make any true Christian man or woman willingly give up everything that God has lent them (and indeed, all that they have is a loan) rather than betray Him. They betray Him if, out of fear, they abandon the confession of His Christian faith.
And therefore, to finish this piece withal, concerning the dread of losing our outward worldly goods, let us consider the slender commodity that they bring; with what labour they are bought; what a little while they abide with whomsoever they abide with longest; what pain their pleasure is mingled with; what harm the love of them doth unto the soul; what loss is in the keeping if Christ's faith is refused for them; what winning is in the loss, if we lose them for God's sake; how much more profitable they are when well given than when ill kept; and finally what ingratitude it would be if we would not forsake them for Christ's sake rather than for them to forsake Christ unfaithfully, who while he lived for our sake forsook all the world, beside the suffering of shameful and painful death, of which we shall speak afterward.
And so, to wrap this up, regarding the fear of losing our material possessions, let’s think about their limited value; how much effort it takes to acquire them; how briefly they stay with those who have them, even if they hold on the longest; how the enjoyment they bring is mixed with suffering; how loving them can harm the soul; what we lose by clinging to them if we turn away from Christ’s faith; what we gain in the loss if we let go of them for God’s sake; how much better they are when we give them away wisely than when we hoard them poorly; and finally, how ungrateful it would be if we wouldn’t let go of them for Christ’s sake, instead of faithfully turning away from Christ for their sake, who, during his life, gave up everything for us, including enduring a shameful and painful death, which we will discuss later.
If we will consider well these things, I say, and will pray God with his holy hand to print them in our hearts, and will abide and dwell still in the hope of his help, his truth shall, as the prophet saith, so compass us about with a shield that we shall not need to be afraid of this incursion of this midday devil—this plain open persecution of the Turk—for any loss that we can take by the bereaving from us of our wretched worldly goods. For their short and small pleasure in this life forborne, we shall be with heavenly substance everlastingly recompensed by God, in joyful bliss and glory.
If we truly think about these things, I say, and pray to God with a sincere heart to engrave them in our minds, and continue to hold on to the hope of his support, his truth will, as the prophet says, surround us like a shield so that we won't have to fear this attack of the midday devil—this blatant persecution by the Turk—for any loss we might face from the stripping of our meager worldly possessions. For the fleeting enjoyment we give up in this life, we will be rewarded by God with eternal treasures in joyful bliss and glory.
XVII
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, as for these outward goods, you have said enough. No man can be sure what strength he shall have or how faint and feeble he may find himself when he shall come to the point, and therefore I can make no warranty of myself, seeing that St. Peter so suddenly fainted at a woman's word and so cowardly forsook his master, for whom he had so boldly fought within so few hours before, and by that fall in forsaking well perceived that he had been too rash in his promise and was well worthy to take a fall for putting so full trust in himself. Yet in good faith methinketh now (and God will, I trust, help me to keep this thought still) that if the Turk should take all that I have, unto my very shirt, unless I would forsake my faith, and should offer it all to me again with five times as much if I would fall into his sect, I would not once stick at it—rather to forsake it every whit, than to forsake any point of Christ's holy faith.
VINCENT: Seriously, uncle, you've said enough about material things. No one can be certain about their own strength or how weak they might feel when the moment comes. So, I can't guarantee anything about myself, especially since St. Peter fainted at a woman's word and cowardly abandoned his master after fighting so bravely just hours before. His fall showed that he was too quick to promise and deserved to stumble for putting too much trust in himself. But honestly, I believe now (and I hope God helps me hold onto this thought) that if the Turk took everything I have, even down to my shirt, and offered it all back to me with five times more if I would join his faith, I wouldn't even hesitate—I'd rather give it all up than deny any part of Christ's holy faith.
But surely, good uncle, when I bethink me further on the grief and the pain that may turn unto my flesh, here find I the fear that forceth my heart to tremble.
But surely, good uncle, as I think more about the grief and the pain that might affect my body, I find the fear that makes my heart tremble.
ANTHONY: Neither have I cause to marvel at that, nor have you, cousin, cause to be dismayed for it. The great horror and fear that our Saviour had in his own flesh, against his painful passion, maketh me little to marvel. And I may well make you take this comfort, too, that for no such manner of grudging felt in your sensual parts, the flesh shrinking in the meditation of pain and death, your reason shall give over, but resist it and manly master it. And though you would fain fly from the painful death and be loth to come to it, yet may the meditation of our Saviour's great grievous agony move you. And he himself shall, if you so desire him, not fail to work with you therein, and to get and give you the grace to submit and conform your will unto his, as he did his unto his Father. And thereupon shall you be so comforted with the secret inward inspiration of his Holy Spirit, as he was with the personal presence of that angel who after his agony came and comforted him. And so shall you as his true disciple follow him, and with good will, without grudge, do as he did, and take your cross of pain and suffering upon your back and die for the truth with him, and thereby reign with him crowned in eternal glory.
ANTHONY: I have no reason to be surprised by that, nor do you, cousin, have a reason to be upset by it. The deep horror and fear our Savior felt in his own body as he faced his painful suffering make it less surprising to me. I can also reassure you that for any discomfort you feel in your physical self, as your body reacts to thoughts of pain and death, your mind will not give in; instead, it should resist and conquer it with bravery. And even if you want to escape from the painful death and dread facing it, the reflection on our Savior's immense agony can inspire you. If you wish, he will support you in this, helping you find the grace to align your will with his, just as he aligned his will with his Father's. In that way, you will be comforted by the quiet, inner inspiration of his Holy Spirit, just as he was comforted by the angel who came to him after his agony. As his true disciple, you will follow him and willingly bear the cross of pain and suffering, dying for the truth alongside him, and so you will reign with him, crowned in eternal glory.
And this I say to give you warning of the truth, to the intent that when a man feeleth such a horror of death in his heart, he should not thereby stand in outrageous fear that he were falling. For many such a man standeth, for all that fear, full fast, and finally better abideth the brunt, when God is so good unto him as to bring him to it and encourage him therein, than doth some other man who in the beginning feeleth no fear at all. And yet may he never be brought to the brunt, and most often so it is. For God, having many mansions, and all wonderful wealthful, in his Father's house, exalteth not every good man up to the glory of a martyr. But foreseeing their infirmity, that though they be of good will before and peradventure of right good courage too, they would yet play St. Peter if they were brought to the point, and thereby bring their souls into the peril of eternal damnation, he provideth otherwise for them before they come there. And he findeth a way that men shall not have the mind to lay any hands upon them, as he found for his disciples when he himself was willingly taken. Or else, if they set hands on them, he findeth a way that they shall have no power to hold them, as he found for St. John the Evangelist, who let his sheet fall from him, upon which they caught hold, and so fled himself naked away and escaped from them. Or, though they hold them and bring them to prison too, yet God sometimes delivereth them hence, as he did St. Peter. And sometimes he taketh them to him out of the prison into heaven, and suffereth them not to come to their torment at all, as he hath done by many a good holy man. And some he suffereth to be brought into the torments and yet suffereth them not to die in them, but to live many years afterward and die their natural death, as he did by St. John the Evangelist and by many another more, as we may well see both by sundry stories and in the epistles of St. Ciprian also. And therefore, which way God will take with us, we cannot tell.
And I say this to warn you of the truth, so that when a person feels a deep fear of death in their heart, they shouldn’t be overwhelmed by the fear of falling. Many such people, despite their fear, stand firm and ultimately bear the situation better, when God is gracious enough to guide them through it, than someone who feels no fear at the start. Yet that other person may never face the test at all, and more often than not, that happens. God, who has many mansions, rich and wonderful in His Father's house, does not elevate every good person to the glory of a martyr. But knowing their weakness, even if they have a good will and perhaps some real courage, they might still act like St. Peter if they are pushed to the point of trial, putting their souls at risk of eternal damnation, and He prepares differently for them before they reach that moment. He finds a way so that no one will think to harm them, like He did for His disciples when He was willingly captured. Or if they do try to arrest them, He finds a way for them to escape, as He did for St. John the Evangelist, who let his garment fall when they grabbed him and fled away naked. Or even if they are arrested and taken to prison, sometimes God frees them, like He did for St. Peter. Sometimes He brings them directly from prison to heaven, preventing them from facing torture at all, as He has done for many holy individuals. And sometimes, He allows them to endure torment but does not let them die in it, allowing them to live many more years and die a natural death, as with St. John the Evangelist and many others, as we can see in various stories and in the letters of St. Cyprian. Therefore, we cannot know how God will treat us.
But surely, if we be true Christian men, this can we well tell: that without any bold warranty of ourselves or foolish trust in our own strength, we are bound upon pain of damnation not to be of the contrary mind but what we will with his help, however loth we feel in our flesh thereto, rather than forsake him or his faith before the world—which if we do, he hath promised to forsake us before his Father and all his holy company of heaven—rather, I say, than we would do so, we would with his help endure and sustain for his sake all the tormentry that the devil with all his faithless tormentors in this world would devise. And then, if we be of this mind, and submit our will unto his, and call and pray for his grace, we can tell well enough that he will never suffer them to put more upon us than his grace will make us able to bear, but will also with their temptation provide for us a sure way. For "God is faithful," saith St. Paul, "who suffereth you not to be tempted above what you can bear, but giveth also with the temptation a way out." For either, as I said, he will keep us out of their hands, though he before suffered us to be afraid of them to prove our faith (that we may have, by the examination of our mind, some comfort in hope of his grace and some fear of our own frailty to drive us to call for grace), or else, if we call into their hands, provided that we fall not from the trust of him nor cease to call for his help, his truth shall, as the prophet saith, so compass us about with a shield that we shall not need to fear this incursion of this midday devil. For these Turks his tormentors, who shall enter this land and persecute us, shall either not have the power to touch our bodies at all, or else the short pain that they shall put into our bodies shall turn us to eternal profit both in our souls and in our bodies too. And therefore, cousin, to begin with, let us be of good comfort. For we are by our faith very sure that holy scripture is the very word of God, and that the word of God cannot but be true. And we see by the mouth of his holy prophet and by the mouth of his blessed apostle also that God hath made us faithful promise that he will not suffer us to be tempted above our power, but will both provide a way out for us and also compass us round about with his shield and defend us that we shall have no cause to fear this midday devil with all his persecution. We cannot therefore but be very sure (unless we are very shamefully cowardous of heart and out of measure faint in faith toward God, and in love less than luke-warm or waxed even key-cold) we may be very sure, I say, either that God will not suffer the Turks to invade this land; or that, if they do, God shall provide such resistance that they shall not prevail; or that, if they prevail, yet if we take the way that I have told you we shall by their persecution take little harm or rather none harm at all, but that which shall seem harm indeed be to us no harm at all but good. For if God make us and keep us good men, as he hath promised to do if we pray well therefore, then saith holy scripture, "Unto good folk all things turn them to good."
But surely, if we are true Christians, we can confidently say that without any false confidence in ourselves or foolish trust in our own strength, we are compelled, under the threat of damnation, to maintain our beliefs with His help, even if we feel reluctant in our hearts. We must not abandon Him or His faith before the world—if we do, He has promised to forsake us before His Father and all the holy company in heaven. Rather than do that, we would, with His help, endure and withstand all the torment that the devil and all his unfaithful tormentors could devise. If we have this mindset, submit our will to His, and pray for His grace, we can be assured that He will never allow us to be tested beyond what His grace enables us to bear, and He will provide a way out of temptation. As St. Paul says, "God is faithful," who does not allow you to be tempted beyond what you can handle but will also provide a way to escape alongside that temptation. Either, as I mentioned, He will keep us safe from their grasp, even though He might allow us to feel fear to test our faith, so we can find comfort in the hope of His grace and acknowledge our own frailty that drives us to seek grace, or, if we do fall into their hands, as long as we hold onto our trust in Him and keep asking for His help, His truth will, as the prophet says, surround us with a shield so we won’t have to fear this midday devil. Those tormentors, the Turks, who may invade this land and persecute us, will either be unable to touch our bodies at all, or the brief pain they inflict will ultimately benefit our souls and bodies for eternity. So, cousin, let’s start by being encouraged. We are certain through our faith that holy scripture is the true word of God, and the word of God must be true. Through His holy prophet and blessed apostle, we see that God has made a promise to us that He will not let us be tempted beyond our limits, but will provide a way out and protect us with His shield, so we won’t have any reason to fear this midday devil and all his persecution. We can be very sure (unless we cowardly lack heart and measurelessly faint in faith towards God, and have love that is less than lukewarm or even cold) that either God will not allow the Turks to invade this land; or if they do, God will provide such resistance that they won’t succeed; or if they do prevail, as I have said, we will suffer little harm or perhaps no harm at all from their persecution, and what seems like harm will actually be good for us. For if God makes us and keeps us good people, as He has promised to do if we pray sincerely for it, then holy scripture says, "For good people, all things turn to good."
And therefore, cousin, since God knoweth what shall happen and not we, let us in the meanwhile with a good hope in the help of God's grace have a good purpose of standing sure by his holy faith against all persecutions. And if we should hereafter, either for fear or pain or for lack of his grace lost in our own default, mishap to decline from his good purpose—which our Lord forbid—yet we would have won the well-spent time beforehand, to the diminishment of our pain, and God would also be much the more likely to lift us up after our fall and give us his grace again. Howbeit, if this persecution come, we are, by this meditation and well-continued intent and purpose beforehand, the better strengthened and confirmed, and much more likely to stand indeed. And if it so fortune, as with God's grace at men's good prayers and amendment of our evil lives it may well fortune, that the Turks shall either be well withstood and vanquished or peradventure not invade us at all, then shall we, perdy, by this good purpose get ourselves of God a very good cheap thank!
And so, cousin, since God knows what will happen and we do not, let’s, in the meantime, stay hopeful in God’s grace and commit to maintaining our faith against all adversity. If we should later, out of fear, pain, or due to lacking His grace and failing ourselves, stray from His good intentions—which may God prevent—at least we would have spent our time well beforehand, reducing our suffering, and God would be much more likely to lift us up after our fall and grant us His grace again. However, if this persecution comes, we are better prepared and strengthened by this reflection and ongoing commitment, making us much more likely to stand firm. And if it turns out, as it could with God’s grace through people's good prayers and by improving our own lives, that the Turks are either successfully resisted and defeated or perhaps don’t invade us at all, then we will surely be grateful to God for this good determination!
And on the other hand, while we now think on it—and not to think on it, in so great likelihood of it, I suppose no wise man can—if we should for the fear of worldly loss or bodily pain, framed in our own minds, think that we would give over and to save our goods and lives forsake our Saviour by denial of his faith, then whether the Turks come or come not, we are meanwhile gone from God. And then if they come not indeed, or come and are driven to flight, what a shame should that be to us, before the face of God, in so shameful cowardly wise to forsake him for fear of that pain that we never felt or that never was befalling us!
And on the other hand, as we reflect on this—because I don't think any wise person can ignore it—if we convince ourselves that out of fear of losing our possessions or facing physical pain, we would turn our backs on our Savior and deny our faith to protect our lives, then it doesn't matter if the Turks come or not; in that moment, we've already turned away from God. And if they don't come at all, or if they do and are stopped, how shameful would that be for us, standing before God, to have forsaken Him out of fear of a pain we never experienced or that never happened to us?
VINCENT: By my troth, uncle, I thank you. Methinketh that though you never said more in the matter, yet have you, even with this that you have spoken here already of the fear of bodily pain in this persecution, marvellously comforted mine heart.
VINCENT: Truly, uncle, thank you. I think that even though you haven't said much about it, just by mentioning the fear of physical pain in this ordeal, you've greatly comforted my heart.
ANTHONY: I am glad, cousin, if your heart have taken comfort thereby. But if you so have, give God the thanks and not me, for that work is his and not mine. For neither am I able to say any good thing except by him, nor can all the good words in the world—no, not the holy words of God himself, and spoken also with his own holy mouth—profit a man with the sound entering at his ear, unless the Spirit of God also inwardly work in his soul. But that is his goodness ever ready to do, unless there be hindrance through the untowardness of our own froward will.
ANTHONY: I'm glad, cousin, if your heart has found comfort in that. But if it has, give thanks to God and not to me, because that work is His, not mine. I can't say anything good except through Him, and no amount of good words— not even the holy words of God spoken by His own holy mouth— will benefit a person just by hearing them unless the Spirit of God is also working in their soul. But He is always ready to do that, unless something gets in the way because of our own stubborn will.
XVIII
And now, being somewhat in comfort and courage before, we may the more quietly consider everything, which is somewhat more hard and difficult to do when the heart is before taken up and oppressed with the troublous affection of heavy sorrowful fear. Let us therefore examine now the weight and the substance of those bodily pains which you rehearsed before as the sorest part of this persecution. They were, if I remember you right, thraldom, imprisonment, and painful and shameful death. And first let us, as reason is, begin with the thraldom, for that was, as I remember it, the first.
And now, feeling a bit more at ease and brave than before, we can more calmly think about everything, which is harder to do when the heart is weighed down and troubled by the heavy burden of painful fear. So let's take a look at the weight and reality of those bodily pains you mentioned earlier as the most severe part of this persecution. They were, if I recall correctly, slavery, imprisonment, and a painful and shameful death. First, let’s start with slavery, as that, if I remember right, was the first.
VINCENT: I pray you, good uncle, say then somewhat of that. For methinketh, uncle, that captivity is a marvellous heavy thing, namely when they shall (as they most commonly do) carry us far from home into a strange unknown land.
VINCENT: I urge you, dear uncle, please say something about that. Because I think, uncle, that being captured is an incredibly hard thing, especially when they (as they usually do) take us far from home to an unfamiliar, unknown land.
ANTHONY: I cannot deny that some grief it is, cousin, indeed. But yet, as for me, it is not half so much as it would be if they could carry me out into any such unknown country that God could not know where nor find the means to come at me!
ANTHONY: I can't deny that it's sad, cousin, really. But for me, it's not nearly as bad as it would be if they took me to some unknown place where God couldn’t find me or reach me!
But now in good faith, cousin, if my migration into a strange country were any great grief unto me, the fault should be much in myself. For since I am very sure that whithersoever man convey me, God is no more verily here than he shall be there, if I get (as I can, if I will) the grace to set mine whole heart upon him and long for nothing but him, it can then make no matter to my mind, whether they carry me hence or leave me here. And then, if I find my mind much offended therewith, that I am not still here in mine own country, I must consider that the cause of my grief is mine own wrong imagination, whereby I beguile myself with an untrue persuasion, thinking that this were mine own country. Whereas in truth it is not so, for, as St. Paul saith, "We have here no city nor dwelling-country at all, but we seek for one that we shall come to." And in whatsoever country we walk in this world, we are but as pilgrims and wayfaring men. And if I should take any country for mine own, it must be the country to which I come and not the country from which I came. That country, which shall be to me then for a while so strange, shall yet perdy be no more strange to me—nor longer strange to me, neither—than was mine own native country when first I came into it. And therefore if my being far from hence be very grievous to me, and I find it a great pain that I am not where I wish to be, that grief shall in great part grow for lack of sure setting and settling my mind in God, where it should be. And when I mend that fault of mine, I shall soon ease my grief.
But now, honestly, cousin, if moving to a new country is so upsetting to me, then the problem lies mostly with myself. I’m sure that wherever I go, God is just as truly there as He is here, as long as I can find the grace to focus my whole heart on Him and desire nothing but Him. That means it shouldn’t matter to me whether I’m taken away from here or stay put. And if I feel really troubled about not being in my own country anymore, I need to realize that my grief comes from my own false thoughts, which trick me into believing that this was my true home. In reality, it’s not; as St. Paul says, “We have no lasting city here, but we seek one that we will come to.” No matter where we are in this world, we are just travelers and wanderers. If I were to consider any place as my own, it should be the place I’m going to, not the place I came from. That new country, which may seem so foreign to me at first, will eventually feel no stranger than my own homeland did when I first arrived there. So if being far from here bothers me deeply and I feel upset about not being where I want to be, that sorrow will mostly stem from not fully grounding my mind in God, where it ought to be. Once I correct this flaw, I will quickly find relief from my distress.
Now, as for all the other griefs and pains that are in captivity, thraldom, and bondage, I cannot deny that many there are and great. Howbeit, they seem yet somewhat the more—what say I, "somewhat"? I may say a great deal the more—because we took our former liberty for a great deal more than indeed it was.
Now, as for all the other sorrows and struggles that come with being trapped, enslaved, and in bondage, I can't deny there are many and they are significant. However, they seem even more—what do I mean by “somewhat”? I mean a whole lot more—because we valued our previous freedom much more than it actually was.
Let us therefore consider the matter thus: Captivity, bondage, or thraldom, what is it but the violent restraint of a man, being so subdued under the dominion, rule, and power of another that he must do whatever the other please to command him, and may not do at his liberty such things as he please himself? Now, when we shall be carried away by a Turk and be fain to be occupied about such things as he please to set us, we shall lament the loss of our liberty and think we bear a heavy burden of our servile condition. And we shall have, I grant well, many times great occasion to do so. But yet we should, I suppose, set somewhat the less by it, if we would remember well what liberty that was that we lost, and take it for no larger than it was indeed. For we reckon as though we might before do what we would, but in that we deceive ourselves. For what free man is there so free that he can be suffered to do what he please? In many things God hath restrained us by his high commandment—so many, that of those things which we would otherwise do, I daresay it be more than half. Howbeit, because (God forgive us) we forbear so little for all that, but do what we please as though we heard him not, we reckon our liberty never the less. But then is our liberty much restrained by the laws made by man, for the quiet and politic governance of the people. And these too would, I suppose, hinder our liberty but little, were it not for the fear of the penalties that fall thereupon. Look then, whether other men who have authority over us never command us some business which we dare not but do, and therefore often do it full sore against our wills. Some such service is sometimes so painful and so perilous too, that no lord can command his bondsmen worse, and seldom doth command him half so sore. Let every free man who reckoneth his liberty to stand in doing what he please, consider well these points, and I daresay he shall then find his liberty much less than he took it for before.
Let’s think about it this way: Captivity, bondage, or servitude is nothing but the forceful restriction of a person, being so overwhelmed by someone else's control and authority that he has to do whatever they command, unable to do as he wishes. When we are taken by a Turk and forced to focus on tasks that he sets for us, we will regret the loss of our freedom and feel the weight of our servile condition. And I agree, there will be many times we’ll have valid reasons to feel this way. However, we should consider it slightly differently if we remember what freedom we lost and recognize it for what it really was. We often think we were free to do whatever we wanted, but that's a self-deception. What free person can truly do whatever they please? In many ways, God has limited us with His commandments—so many that I would say more than half of what we would otherwise do is restricted. Still, because (God forgive us) we often ignore those limits and do as we wish, we still think of our liberty as intact. But our freedom is also heavily restricted by human-made laws, established for the orderly governance of society. These laws might not seem to limit our freedom too much if it weren't for the fear of the penalties they impose. Consider that those in authority over us often command us to do things we must obey, even when we really don’t want to. Some tasks are so burdensome and dangerous that no lord would treat his bondservants worse, and they seldom command anything that severe. Every free person who believes their liberty is based on doing whatever they want should reflect on these points, and I bet they'll realize their freedom is much less than they previously thought.
And yet have I left untouched the bondage that almost every man is in who boasteth himself for free—the bondage, I mean, of sin. And that it be a true bondage, I shall have our Saviour himself to bear me good record. For he saith, "Every man who committeth sin is the thrall, or the bondsman, of sin." And then if this be thus (as it must needs be, since God saith it is so), who is there then who can make so much boast of his liberty that he should take it for so sore a thing and so strange to become through chance of war, bondsman unto a man, since he is already through sin become willingly thrall and bondsman unto the devil?
And yet I haven't addressed the slavery that almost every man is in while claiming to be free—the slavery of sin. To show that this is a real bondage, I’ll cite our Savior himself as a witness. For he says, "Every man who commits sin is a slave to sin." And if this is the case (as it must be, since God says it is), then who can boast about their freedom so much that they feel it's such a terrible and unusual thing to become a slave to a man through war, when they are already willingly enslaved to the devil through sin?
Let us look well how many things, and of what vile wretched sort, the devil driveth us to do daily, through the rash turns of our blind affections, which we are fain to follow, for our faultful lack of grace, and are too feeble to refrain. And then shall we find in our natural freedom our bondservice such that never was there any man lord of any so vile a bondsman that he ever would command him to so shameful service. And let us, in the doing of our service to the man that we be slave unto, remember what we were wont to do about the same time of day while we were at our free liberty before, and would be well likely, if we were at liberty, to do again. And we shall peradventure perceive that it were better for us to do this business than that. Now we shall have great occasion of comfort, if we consider that our servitude, though in the account of the world it seem to come by chance of war, cometh unto us yet in very deed by the provident hand of God, and that for our great good if we will take it well, both in remission of sins and also as matter of our merit.
Let’s take a closer look at how many things, and how lowly and wretched they are, that the devil pushes us to do every day, through the impulsive shifts of our blind feelings, which we feel compelled to follow due to our sinful lack of grace, and we are too weak to resist. Then we’ll discover that in our natural freedom, we are bound in such a way that no man ever had a servant so wretched that he would command him to engage in such shameful acts. And as we serve the master we are enslaved to, let’s remember what we used to do around this time of day when we were free, and what we would likely do again if we were free. We might realize that it would be better for us to engage in this task than that. Now, we can find great comfort if we consider that our servitude, though it seems to come from the chance of war in the eyes of the world, actually comes from the guiding hand of God, and it is for our greater good if we choose to accept it, both in terms of forgiveness for our sins and as a matter of our merit.
The greatest grief that is in bondage or captivity, I believe, is this: that we are forced to do such labour as with our good will we would not. But then against that grief, Seneca teacheth us a good remedy: "Endeavour thyself evermore that thou do nothing against thy will, but the things that we see we shall needs do, let us always put our good will thereto."
The biggest sorrow of being in bondage or captivity, I think, is this: being forced to do work that we wouldn't choose to do willingly. But in response to that sorrow, Seneca offers us a good solution: "Always strive to do nothing against your will, but for the things we must do, let’s always bring our willingness to them."
VINCENT: That is soon said, uncle, but it is hard to do.
VINCENT: That's easy to say, uncle, but it's tough to do.
ANTHONY: Our froward mind maketh every good thing hard, and that to our own more hurt and harm. But in this case, if we will be good Christian men, we shall have great cause gladly to be content, for the great comfort that we may take thereby. For we remember that in the patient and glad doing of our service unto that man for God's sake, according to his high commandment by the mouth of St. Paul, "Servi obedite dominis carnalibus," we shall have our thanks and our whole reward of God.
ANTHONY: Our stubborn minds make every good thing difficult, often to our own detriment. However, in this case, if we want to be good Christian men, we should find reason to be content, as we can take great comfort from it. We remember that by patiently and gladly serving that man for God's sake, as commanded by St. Paul, "Servi obedite dominis carnalibus,” we will receive our thanks and our full reward from God.
Finally, if we remember the great humble meekness of our Saviour Christ himself—that he, being very almighty God, "humbled himself and took the form of a bondsman or slave," rather than that his Father should forsake us—we may think ourselves very ungrateful caitiffs (and very frantic fools, too) if, rather than to endure this worldly bondage for awhile, we would forsake him who hath by his own death delivered us out of everlasting bondage to the devil, and who will for our short bondage give us everlasting liberty.
Finally, if we consider the incredible humility of our Savior Christ himself—that he, being all-powerful God, “humbled himself and took on the form of a servant or slave,” rather than let his Father abandon us—we might see ourselves as very ungrateful wretches (and quite foolish, too) if, instead of enduring this temporary worldly struggle, we choose to turn away from him who has, through his own death, freed us from eternal bondage to the devil, and who will trade our brief hardships for everlasting freedom.
VINCENT: Well fare you, good uncle, this is very well said! Albeit that bondage is a condition that every man of any spirit would be very glad to eschew and very loth to fall in, yet have you well made it so open that it is a thing neither so strange nor so sore as it before seemed to me. And specially is it far from such as any man who hath any wit should, for fear of it, shrink from the confession of his faith. And now, therefore, I pray you, speak somewhat of imprisonment.
VINCENT: Well, farewell, good uncle; you’ve said that very well! Although being in bondage is a state that any spirited person would be eager to avoid and would dread to enter, you've made it clear that it's not as strange or painful as I once thought. It's definitely not something that anyone with common sense should shy away from admitting their beliefs because of fear. Now, I ask you to talk a bit about imprisonment.
XIX
ANTHONY: That shall I, cousin, with good will. And first, if we could consider what thing imprisonment is of its own nature methinketh we should not have so great horror of it. For of itself it is, perdy, but a restraint of liberty, which hindereth a man from going whither he would.
ANTHONY: I will do that, cousin, gladly. And first, if we could think about what imprisonment really is by nature, I believe we wouldn't be so terrified of it. Because, in itself, it is just a restriction of freedom, which stops a person from going where they want to.
VINCENT: Yes, by St. Mary, uncle, but methinketh it is much more sorry than that. For beside the hindrance and restraint of liberty, it hath many more displeasures and very sore griefs knit and adjoined to it.
VINCENT: Yes, by St. Mary, uncle, but I think it’s much worse than that. Because besides the loss of freedom, it comes with many more troubles and deep sorrows connected to it.
ANTHONY: That is, cousin, very true indeed. And those pains, among many sorer than those, thought I not afterward to forget. Howbeit, I purpose now to consider first imprisonment as imprisonment alone, without any other incommodity besides. For a man may be imprisoned, perdy, and yet not set in the stocks or collared fast by the neck. And a man may be let walk at large where he will, and yet have a pair of fetters fast riveted on his legs. For in this country, you know, and Seville and Portugal too, so go all the slaves. Howbeit, because for such things men's hearts have such horror of it, albeit that I am not so mad as to go about to prove that bodily pain were no pain, yet since it is because of this manner of pains that we so especially abhor the state and condition of prisoners, methinketh we should well perceive that a great part of our horror groweth of our own fancy. Let us call to mind and consider the state and condition of many other folk in whose state and condition we would wish ourselves to stand, taking them for no prisoners at all, who stand yet for all that in many of the selfsame points that we abhor imprisonment for. Let us therefore consider these things in order. First, those other kinds of grief that come with imprisonment are but accidents unto it. And yet they are neither such accidents as be proper unto it, since they may almost all befall man without it; nor are they such accidents as be inseparable from it, since imprisonment may fall to a man and none of them therein. We will, I say, therefore begin by considering what manner of pain or incommodity we should reckon imprisonment to be of itself and of its own nature alone. And then in the course of our communication, you shall as you please increase and aggravate the cause of your horror with the terror of those painful accidents.
ANTHONY: That’s very true, cousin. And those pains, among many others worse than that, I thought I wouldn’t forget later. However, I want to first think about imprisonment as just imprisonment, without any other inconveniences attached. A person can be imprisoned, of course, and not be put in stocks or have a collar locked around their neck. And a person might be free to walk wherever they want, yet still have shackles tightly fixed to their legs. Because in this country, and in Seville and Portugal too, that’s how all the slaves live. Still, it’s because of these kinds of things that people have such a deep-seated fear of it. While I’m not crazy enough to claim that physical pain isn’t pain at all, it seems we should recognize that a big part of our fear comes from our own imagination. Let’s remember and think about the situation of many others whom we would prefer to be like, considering them not to be prisoners at all, even though they actually deal with many of the same issues that make us despise imprisonment. So let’s think about this in order. First, those other kinds of pain that come with imprisonment are just accidents of it. They aren’t unique to imprisonment since most can happen to anyone regardless of it; nor are they unavoidable accidents of it, as someone can be imprisoned without experiencing any of those pains. So let’s start by assessing what kind of pain or inconvenience imprisonment is purely on its own. And then as we go along, you can add to your fear with the terror of those painful accidents as you see fit.
VINCENT: I am sorry that I did interrupt your tale, for you were about, I see well, to take an orderly way therein. And as you yourself have devised, so I beseech you proceed. For though I reckon imprisonment much the sorer thing by sore and hard handling therein, yet reckon I not the imprisonment of itself any less than a thing very tedious, although it were used in the most favourable manner that it possibly could be.
VINCENT: I'm sorry for interrupting your story, as I can see you were about to explain it clearly. Please continue as you planned. I believe imprisonment is quite harsh due to the difficult treatment involved, but I still find imprisonment itself to be incredibly tedious, even if it were handled in the best possible way.
For, uncle, if a great prince were taken prisoner upon the field, and in the hand of a Christian king, such as are accustomed, in such cases, for the consideration of their former estate and mutable chance of war, to show much humanity to them, and treat them in very favourable wise—for these infidel emperors handle oftentimes the princes that they take more villainously than they do the poorest men, as the great Tamberlane kept the great Turk, when he had taken him, to tread on his back always when he leapt on horseback. But, as I began to say, by the example of a prince taken prisoner, were the imprisonment never so favourable, yet it would be, to my mind, no little grief in itself for a man to be penned up, though not in a narrow chamber. But although his walk were right large and right fair gardens in it too, it could not but grieve his heart to be restrained by another man within certain limits and bounds, and lose the liberty to be where he please.
For, uncle, if a great prince were captured on the battlefield and held by a Christian king, who is known to show kindness in such situations, treating them fairly due to their former status and the unpredictable nature of war—since these infidel emperors often treat captured princes more cruelly than they do the poorest men, like how the great Tamerlane made the great Turk always step on his back whenever he mounted his horse. But, as I was saying, even in the case of a prince being imprisoned under the best conditions, it would still be a significant sorrow for a man to be confined, even if it wasn't in a tiny room. Even if he had the freedom to walk in expansive and beautiful gardens, it would still hurt his heart to be restricted by someone else within certain limits and lose the freedom to go wherever he wanted.
ANTHONY: This is, cousin, well considered of you. For in this you perceive well that imprisonment is, of itself and of its own very nature alone, nothing else but the retaining of a man's person within the circuit of a certain space, narrower or larger as shall be limited to him, restraining his liberty from going further into any other place.
ANTHONY: This is a thoughtful insight, cousin. You understand that imprisonment, by its very nature, is simply the act of holding a person within a defined space, whether small or large, restricting their freedom to move beyond that area.
VINCENT: Very well said, methinketh.
VINCENT: Very well said, I think.
ANTHONY: Yet I forgot, cousin, to ask you one question.
ANTHONY: But I forgot, cousin, to ask you one thing.
VINCENT: What is that, uncle?
VINCENT: What's that, uncle?
ANTHONY: This, lo: If there be two men kept in two several chambers of one great castle, of which two chambers the one is much larger than the other, are they prisoners both, or only the one who has the less room to walk in?
ANTHONY: Look, if there are two men kept in separate rooms of a large castle, and one room is much bigger than the other, are they both prisoners, or just the one who has less space to move around in?
VINCENT: What question is it, uncle, but that they are both prisoners, as I said myself before, although the one lay fast locked in the stocks and the other had all the whole castle to walk in?
VINCENT: What question is there, uncle, other than that they are both prisoners, as I mentioned earlier, even though one was locked up in the stocks and the other had the entire castle to roam around in?
ANTHONY: Methinketh verily, cousin, that you say the truth. And then, if imprisonment be such a thing as you yourself here agree it is—that is, but a lack of liberty to go whither we please—now would I fain know of you what one man you know who is at this day out of prison?
ANTHONY: I truly believe, cousin, that you are speaking the truth. So, if imprisonment is really what you say it is—that is, just a lack of freedom to go wherever we want—then I would like to know from you, who do you know that is out of prison today?
VINCENT: What one man, uncle? Marry, I know almost none other! For surely I am acquainted with no prisoner, that I remember.
VINCENT: Which man, uncle? Honestly, I barely know anyone else! I certainly don’t remember knowing any prisoners.
ANTHONY: Then I see well that you visit poor prisoners seldom.
ANTHONY: Then I see that you rarely visit poor prisoners.
VINCENT: No, by my troth, uncle, I cry God mercy. I send them sometimes mine alms, but by my troth I love not to come myself where I should see such misery.
VINCENT: No, I swear, uncle, I thank God for mercy. I do send them my donations sometimes, but honestly, I really don’t like to go myself where I have to witness such suffering.
ANTHONY: In good faith, Cousin Vincent (though I say it before you) you have many good qualities, but surely (though I say that before you, too) that is not one of them. If you would amend it, then should you have yet the more good qualities by one—and peradventure the more by three or four. For I assure you it is hard to tell how much good it doth to a man's soul, the personal visiting of poor prisoners.
ANTHONY: In all honesty, Cousin Vincent (and I’m saying this to your face), you have many good qualities, but definitely (and I’m saying this to your face as well) that is not one of them. If you could change it, you’d have one more good quality—and maybe even three or four more. Because I can tell you, visiting poor prisoners in person does a lot of good for a man’s soul.
But now, since you can name me none of them that are in prison, I pray you name me some one of all those whom you are, you say, better acquainted with—men, I mean, who are out of prison. For I know, methinketh, as few of them as you know of the others.
But now, since you can’t name any of those who are in prison, please name someone from all those you say you know better—men, I mean, who are out of prison. Because I think you know just as few of them as you do of the others.
VINCENT: That would, uncle, be a strange case. For every man is out of prison who may go where he will, though he be the poorest beggar in the town. And, in good faith, uncle (because you reckon imprisonment so small a matter of itself) meseemeth the poor beggar who is at his liberty and may walk where he will is in better case than is a king kept in prison, who cannot go but where men give him leave.
VINCENT: That would, uncle, be a strange situation. Every man is free who can go wherever he wants, even if he’s the poorest beggar in town. And honestly, uncle (since you consider imprisonment such a minor issue), it seems to me that the poor beggar who is free and can walk wherever he likes is in a better position than a king who is imprisoned and can only go where people allow him.
ANTHONY: Well, cousin, whether every way-walking beggar be, by this reason, out of prison or no, we shall consider further when you will. But in the meanwhile I can by this reason see no prince who seemeth to be out of prison. For if the lack of liberty to go where a man will, be imprisonment, as you yourself say it is, then is the great Turk, by whom we fear to be put in prison, in prison already himself, for he may not go where he will. For if he could he would go into Portugal, Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and England, and as far in the other direction too—both into Prester John's land and into the Grand Cham's too.
ANTHONY: Well, cousin, whether every wandering beggar is out of prison or not, we can discuss later whenever you want. But for now, I can’t see any prince who seems to be free. If being unable to go wherever you want is imprisonment, as you say, then the great Turk, whom we fear might imprison us, is also imprisoned himself because he can't go wherever he wants. If he could, he would travel to Portugal, Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and England, as well as farther east into Prester John’s land and the Grand Cham’s territory.
Now, the beggar that you speak of, if he be (as you say he is) by reason of his liberty to go where he will, in much better case than a king kept in prison, because he cannot go but where men give him leave; then is that beggar in better case, not only than a prince in prison but also than many a prince out of prison too. For I am sure there is many a beggar who may without hindrance walk further upon other men's ground than many a prince at his best liberty may walk upon his own. And as for walking out abroad upon other men's, that prince might be withstood and held fast, where that beggar, with his bag and staff, might be suffered to go forth and keep on his way.
Now, the beggar you're talking about, if he really is (like you say) in a much better situation because he can go wherever he wants, compared to a king who's imprisoned and can only go where he's allowed, then that beggar is better off, not just than a prince in prison but also than many princes who are free. I'm sure there are plenty of beggars who can walk across other people's land without any issues, while many princes, even when they’re free, can't walk on their own land without restrictions. And when it comes to going out on other people's property, that prince might be stopped and held back, while that beggar, with his bag and staff, would be allowed to move on and continue his journey.
But forasmuch, cousin, as neither the beggar nor the prince is at free liberty to walk where they will, but neither of them would be suffered to walk in some places without men withstanding them and saying them nay; therefore if imprisonment be, as you grant it is, a lack of liberty to go where we please, I cannot see but the beggar and the prince, whom you reckon both at liberty, are by your own reason restrained in prison both.
But since, cousin, neither the beggar nor the prince is free to walk wherever they want, because neither of them would be allowed in certain places without people stopping them and telling them no; therefore, if imprisonment is, as you agree it is, a lack of freedom to go where we want, I can't see how both the beggar and the prince, whom you consider to be free, are by your own reasoning confined in prison too.
VINCENT: Yea, but uncle, both the one and the other have way enough to walk—the one in his own ground and the other in other men's, or in the common highway, where they may both walk till they be weary of walking ere any man say them nay.
VINCENT: Sure, but uncle, both of them have plenty of space to walk—one on his own land and the other on other people's property or on the public road, where they can walk until they’re tired of it before anyone tells them not to.
ANTHONY: So may, cousin, that king who had, as you yourself put the case, all the whole castle to walk in. And yet you deny not that he is prisoner for all that—though not so straitly kept, yet as verily prisoner as he that lieth in the stocks.
ANTHONY: So maybe, cousin, that king who had, as you just said, the whole castle to walk around in. And yet you can’t deny that he is a prisoner, even if he’s not kept so strictly; he’s just as much a prisoner as someone locked in stocks.
VINCENT: But they may go at least to every place that they need, or that is commodious for them, and therefore they do not wish to go anywhere but where they may. And therefore they are at liberty to go where they will.
VINCENT: But they can go to any place they need or that works for them, so they don't want to go anywhere except where they can. That's why they are free to go wherever they want.
ANTHONY: I need not, cousin, to spend the time about impugning every part of this answer. Let pass by that, though a prisoner were brought with his keeper into every place where need required, yet since he might not when he wished go where he wished for his pleasure alone, he would be, as you know well, a prisoner still. And let pass over also that it would be needful for this beggar, and commodious for this king, to go into divers places where neither of them may come. And let pass also that neither of them is lightly so temperately determined by what they both fain would so do indeed, if this reason of yours put them out of prison and set them at liberty and made them free, as I will well grant it doth if they so do indeed—that is, if they have no will to go anywhere but where they may go indeed.
ANTHONY: I don’t need to waste time arguing against every point in this answer. Let’s skip that; even if a prisoner is brought everywhere he needs to go with his keeper, since he can't go wherever he wants just for his own enjoyment, he would still be, as you well know, a prisoner. Also, let’s not overlook that it would be important for this beggar and convenient for this king to go to various places where neither of them can go. And let’s also skip the fact that neither of them is usually so reasonably determined by what they would actually like to do if your reasoning were to free them and set them at liberty, which I’ll agree it does, as long as they don’t want to go anywhere other than where they can actually go.
Then let us look on our other prisoners enclosed within a castle, and we shall find that the straitest kept of them both, if he get the wisdom and grace to quiet his mind and hold himself content with that place, and not long (as a woman with child longeth for her desires) to be gadding out anywhere else, is by the same reason of yours, while his will is not longing to be anywhere else, he is, I say, at his free liberty to be where he will. And so he is out of prison too.
Then let's consider our other prisoners locked up in a castle, and we’ll see that the one who is held the tightest, if he manages to find the wisdom and grace to calm his mind and be content with his situation, and doesn’t always yearn to be somewhere else like a pregnant woman craving her desires, is, for the same reasons you mentioned, actually free. As long as his mind isn’t longing to be anywhere else, he is, I say, completely free to be wherever he chooses. So, in that sense, he is no longer in prison either.
And, on the other hand, if, though his will be not longing to be anywhere else, yet because if his will so were he should not be so suffered, he is therefore not at his free liberty but a prisoner still, since your free beggar that you speak of and the prince that you call out of prison too, though they be (which I daresay few be) by some special wisdom so temperately disposed that they will have not the will to be anywhere but where they see that they may be suffered to be, yet, since if they did have that will they could not then be where they would, they lack the effect of free liberty and are both twain in prison too.
And, on the other hand, if someone doesn't want to be anywhere else but still isn't allowed to go where they want, then they're not really free but still a prisoner. Just like the free beggar you mentioned and the prince you called out of prison, even if they have some rare wisdom that makes them perfectly content to be only where they are allowed, they're still not truly free. If they did want to go somewhere else, they couldn't, so they both lack the real experience of freedom and are, in a way, still imprisoned.
VINCENT: Well, uncle, if every man universally is by this reason in prison already, after the proper nature of imprisonment, yet to be imprisoned in this special manner which alone is commonly called imprisonment is a thing of great horror and fear, both for the straitness of the keeping and for the hard handling that many men have therein. Of all the griefs that you speak of, we feel nothing at all. And therefore every man abhorreth the one, and would be loth to come into it. And no man abhorreth the other, for they feel no harm and find no fault therein.
VINCENT: Well, uncle, if every person is essentially in prison because of this reasoning, then being locked up in this specific way, which is what we usually think of as imprisonment, is truly terrifying and dreadful. It's not just about the confinement but also about the harsh treatment many people endure there. Of all the troubles you mention, we don’t feel any of that. That's why everyone hates that kind of imprisonment and would dread experiencing it. Meanwhile, no one hates the other kind because they don’t feel any pain or see anything wrong with it.
Therefore, uncle, in good faith, though I cannot find fitting answers with which to avoid your arguments, yet (to be plain with you and tell you the very truth) my mind findeth not itself satisfied on this point. But ever methinketh that these things, with which you rather convince and conclude me than induce a credence and persuade me that every man is in prison already, are but sophistical fancies, and that except those that are commonly called prisoners, other men are not in any prison at all.
Therefore, uncle, honestly, even though I can't come up with good answers to counter your arguments, I must be straightforward and tell you the truth: I’m not completely satisfied with this issue. I always feel that your points, which you seem to use to convince and conclude me rather than genuinely persuade me that everyone is already imprisoned, are just clever tricks. I believe that aside from those we commonly call prisoners, other people are not in any prison at all.
ANTHONY: Well fare thine heart, good Cousin Vincent! There was, in good faith, no word that you spoke since we first talked of these matters that I liked half so well as these that you speak now. For if you had assented in words and your mind departed unpersuaded, then, if the thing be true that I say, yet had you lost the fruit. And if it be peradventure false, and I myself deceived therein, then, since I should have supposed that you liked it too, you would have confirmed me in my folly. For, in good faith, cousin, such an old fool am I that this thing (in the persuading of which unto you I had thought I had quit me well, and yet which, when I have all done, appeareth to your mind but a trifle and sophistical fancy) I myself have so many years taken it for so very substantial truth that as yet my mind cannot give me to think it any other. But I would not play the part of that French priest who had so long used to say Dominus with the second syllable long that at least he thought it must needs be so, and was ashamed to say it short. So to the intent that you may the better perceive me and I may the better perceive myself, we shall here between us a little more consider the thing. So spit well on your hands boldly, and take good hold, and give it not over against your own mind, for then we would be never the nearer.
ANTHONY: Well, cheer up, my good cousin Vincent! Honestly, there’s nothing you’ve said since we first discussed these matters that I liked as much as what you just said now. Because if you had agreed in words but didn’t truly believe it, then if what I say is true, you would have missed out. And if it turns out to be false and I’m mistaken, I would’ve thought you liked it too, and you would’ve led me into my own foolishness. Really, cousin, I’ve been such a fool for so long that I’ve taken this thing (which I thought I explained well to you, but which seems to you just a small and tricky idea) for such a serious truth that I still can’t convince myself otherwise. But I don’t want to be like that French priest who insisted on saying Dominus with the second syllable long for so long that he thought it had to be that way and was embarrassed to say it short. So, to help you understand me better and for me to understand myself better, let’s think this through a little more together. So roll up your sleeves, hold on tight, and don’t give in against your own beliefs, or we won’t get any closer.
VINCENT: Nay, by my troth, uncle, that intend I not to do. Nor have I done it yet since we began. And that may you well perceive by some things which, without any great cause, save for the further satisfaction of my own mind, I repeated and debated again.
VINCENT: No, I swear, uncle, I don't intend to do that. And I haven't done it yet since we started. You can tell that by some things I've repeated and discussed again, just to satisfy my own mind.
ANTHONY: That guise, cousin, you must hold on boldly still. For I purpose to give up my part in this matter, unless I make you yourself perceive both that every man universally is a very prisoner in very prison—plainly, without any sophistry at all—and also that there is no prince living upon earth who is not in a worse case prisoner by this general imprisonment that I speak of, than is many a simple ignorant wretch by that special imprisonment that you speak of. And beside this, that in this general imprisonment that I speak of, men are for the time that they are in it, so sore handled and so hardly and in such painful wise, that men's hearts have with reason great cause to abhor this hard handling that is in this imprisonment as sorely as they do the other that is in that.
ANTHONY: You need to hold onto that disguise, cousin. I’m planning to step back from this situation unless I can make you realize that every person out there is essentially trapped in their own way—no tricks or fancy talk, just the truth. Also, there’s no ruler on this planet who isn’t in a worse situation due to this universal prison I’m talking about than many of the unfortunate souls you mention who suffer from specific imprisonment. Furthermore, in this general prison I’m referring to, people endure such harsh treatment and pain that it’s completely understandable for their hearts to strongly reject this cruel treatment just as much as they do the other kind you mentioned.
VINCENT: By my troth, uncle, these things would I fain see well proved.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, I really want to see these things proven well.
ANTHONY: Tell me, then, cousin, first by your troth: If a man were attainted of treason or felony; and if, after judgment had been given of his death and it were determined that he should die, the time of his execution were only delayed till the king's further pleasure should be known; if he were thereupon delivered to certain keepers and put up in a sure place out of which he could not escape—would this man be a prisoner, or not?
ANTHONY: So tell me, cousin, honestly: If a man was found guilty of treason or a crime, and after the verdict it was decided he would die, with the execution just postponed until the king decided what to do next; if he were then handed over to certain guards and locked away in a secure place where he couldn’t escape—would this man be considered a prisoner or not?
VINCENT: This man, quoth he? Yea, marry, that would he be in very deed, if ever man were!
VINCENT: This man, you say? Yeah, absolutely, he would be just that for sure, if anyone ever was!
ANTHONY: But now what if, for the time that were between his attainder and his execution, he were so favourably handled that he were suffered to do what he would, as he did while he was free—to have the use of his lands and his goods, and his wife and his children to have license to be with him, and his friends leave at liberty to resort unto him, and his servants not forbidden to abide about him. And add yet thereunto that the place were a great castle royal with parks and other pleasures in it, a very great circuit about. Yes, and add yet, if you like, that he were suffered to go and ride also, both when he wished and whither he wished; only this one point always provided and foreseen, that he should ever be surely seen to, and safely kept from escaping. So though he had never so much of his own will in the meanwhile (in all matters save escaping), yet he should well know that escape he could not, and that when he were called for, to execution and to death he should go.
ANTHONY: But what if, during the time between his conviction and execution, he was treated so well that he was allowed to do whatever he wanted, just like when he was free—to use his lands and possessions, to have his wife and children with him, to have his friends allowed to visit him, and his servants permitted to be around him? And let's say the place was a grand royal castle with parks and other amenities, all spread out over a large area. Yes, and if you want, let's add that he could also go out riding whenever and wherever he wanted; just as long as we always made sure he couldn't escape and was kept safe from fleeing. So even if he had all the freedom he could wish for in everything except escaping, he would still know that he couldn't actually escape, and when the time came, he would have to face his execution and death.
Now, Cousin Vincent, what would you call this man? A prisoner, because he is kept for execution? Or no prisoner, because he is in the meanwhile so favourably handled and suffered to do all that he would, save escape? And I bid you not here be hasty in your answer, but advise it well that you grant no such thing in haste as you would afterward at leisure mislike, and think yourself deceived.
Now, Cousin Vincent, how would you describe this man? A prisoner, since he's being held for execution? Or not a prisoner, since he's treated so well and allowed to do anything he wants, except escape? I urge you not to rush your answer, but to think carefully so that you don't agree to something in haste that you'll later regret and feel tricked by.
VINCENT: Nay, by my troth, uncle, this thing needeth no study at all, to my mind. But, for all this favour showed him and all this liberty lent him, yet being condemned to death, and being kept for it, and kept with sure watch laid upon him that he cannot escape, he is all that while a very plain prisoner still.
VINCENT: No, honestly, uncle, I don’t think this needs any thought at all. However, despite all the kindness shown to him and the freedom granted, he’s still sentenced to death, being held for it, and watched closely so he can't escape; he remains a straightforward prisoner all the same.
ANTHONY: In good faith, cousin, methinketh you say very true. But then one thing must I yet desire you, cousin, to tell me a little further. If there were another laid in prison for a brawl, and through the jailors' displeasure were bolted and fettered and laid in a low dungeon in the stocks, where he might lie peradventure for a while and abide in the meantime some pain but no danger of death at all, but that out again he should come well enough—which of these two prisoners would stand in the worse case? He that hath all this favour, or he that is thus hardly handled?
ANTHONY: Honestly, cousin, I think you’re speaking the truth. But I still need you to clarify something for me. If there was another person locked up for a fight, and because of the jailer's anger, he was put in a low dungeon, in stocks, where he might suffer a bit but wouldn’t face any danger of death—and he would eventually get out fine—who do you think has it worse? The one who has all that favor or the one who's being treated so harshly?
VINCENT: By our Lady, uncle, I believe that most men, if they should needs choose, had liefer be such prisoners in every point as he who so sorely lieth in the stocks, than in every point such as he who walketh at such liberty about the park.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, I think most men, if they had to choose, would rather be prisoners in every way like the one who is painfully stuck in the stocks than be completely free like the one strolling around the park.
ANTHONY: Consider, then, cousin, whether this thing seem any sophistry to you that I shall show you now. For it shall be such as seemeth in good faith substantially true to me. And if it so happen that you think otherwise, I will be very glad to perceive which of us both is beguiled.
ANTHONY: So, cousin, think about whether what I'm about to show you seems like any fancy reasoning to you. Because it honestly seems true to me. And if you think differently, I'd be really interested to see which one of us is misled.
For it seemeth to me, cousin, first, that every man coming into this world here upon earth as he is created by God, so cometh he hither by the providence of God. Is this any sophistry first, or not?
For it seems to me, cousin, first, that every man coming into this world here on earth, just as he is created by God, also comes here by the providence of God. Is this any nonsense, or not?
VINCENT: Nay, verily, this is very substantial truth.
VINCENT: No, seriously, this is truly important.
ANTHONY: Now take I this, also, for very truth in my mind: that there cometh no man nor woman hither into the earth but what, ere ever they come alive into the world out of the mother's womb, God condemneth them unto death by his own sentence and judgment, for the original sin that they bring with them, contracted in the corrupted stock of our forefather Adam. Is this, think you, cousin, verily thus or not?
ANTHONY: I also believe this to be true: that no one comes into this world, man or woman, without God condemning them to death even before they are born, due to the original sin they carry from the corrupted lineage of our ancestor Adam. Do you think, cousin, that this is really the case or not?
VINCENT: This is, uncle, very true indeed.
VINCENT: This is very true, uncle.
ANTHONY: Then seemeth this true further unto me: that God hath put every man here upon the earth under so sure and so safe keeping that of all the whole people living in this wide world, there is neither man, woman, nor child—would they never so far wander about and seek it—who can possibly find any way by which they can escape from death. Is this, cousin, a fond imagined fancy, or is it very truth indeed?
ANTHONY: Then it seems true to me that God has placed every person on this earth under such secure and safe protection that among all the people living in this vast world, there is no man, woman, or child—no matter how far they wander or how hard they search—who can ever find a way to escape death. Is this, cousin, merely a foolish idea, or is it the absolute truth?
VINCENT: Nay, this is no imagination, uncle, but a thing so clearly proved true that no man is so mad as to deny it.
VINCENT: No, this isn’t just a fantasy, uncle, but a fact that's so clearly proven that no one is crazy enough to deny it.
ANTHONY: Then need I say no more, cousin. For then is all the matter plain and open evident truth, which I said I took for truth. And it is yet a little more now than I told you before, when you took my proof yet but for a sophistical fancy, and said that, for all my reasoning that every man is a prisoner, yet you thought that, except those whom the common people call prisoners, there is else no man a very prisoner indeed. And now you grant yourself again for very substantial truth, that every man, though he be the greatest king upon earth, is set here by the ordinance of God in a place, be it never so large, yet a place, I say (and you say the same) out of which no man can escape. And you grant that every man is there put under sure and safe keeping to be readily set forth when God calleth for him, and that then he shall surely die. And is not then, cousin, by your own granting before, every man a very prisoner, when he is put in a place to be kept to be brought forth when he would not, and himself knows not whither?
ANTHONY: Then I don’t need to say anything more, cousin. Everything is clear and obvious, which I already considered to be true. And now it’s even clearer than before, when you only saw my argument as a clever trick, suggesting that despite my reasoning that every man is a prisoner, you believed that only those labeled as prisoners by the common people are actually prisoners. Now you admit that it's a fundamental truth that every man, even the greatest king on earth, is placed here by God in a space—no matter how vast it may be—that no one can escape from. You also agree that every man is kept there securely, ready to be called forth by God, and that when that happens, he will surely die. So, cousin, isn’t it true, based on your previous admission, that every man is indeed a true prisoner when he is confined in a place, kept to be brought out at a time unknown to him?
VINCENT: Yes, in good faith, uncle, I cannot but well perceive this to be so.
VINCENT: Yes, honestly, uncle, I can’t help but see that this is true.
ANTHONY: This would be true, you know, even though a man were but taken by the arm and in a fair manner led out of this world unto his judgment. But now, we well know that there is no king so great but what, all the while he walketh here, walk he never so loose, ride he with never so strong an army for his defence, yet he himself is very sure—though he seek in the meantime some other pastime to put it out of his mind—yet is he very sure, I say, that escape he cannot. And very well he knoweth that he hath already sentence given upon him to die, and that verily die he shall. And though he hope for long respite of his execution, yet can he not tell how soon it will be. And therefore, unless he be a fool, he can never be without fear that, either on the morrow or on the selfsame day, the grisly cruel hangman Death, who from his first coming in hath ever hoved aloof and looked toward him, and ever lain in wait for him, shall amid all his royalty and all his main strength neither kneel before him nor make him any reverence, nor with any good manner desire him to come forth. But he shall rigorously and fiercely grip him by the very breast, and make all his bones rattle, and so by long and divers sore torments strike him stark dead in his prison. And then shall he cause his body to be cast into the ground in a foul pit in some corner of the same, there to rot and be eaten by the wretched worms of the earth, sending yet his soul out further into a more fearful judgment. Of that judgment at his temporal death his success is uncertain and therefore, though by God's grace not out of good hope, for all that in the meanwhile in very sore dread and fear and peradventure in peril inevitable of eternal fire, too.
ANTHONY: This would be true, you know, even if a man were just taken by the arm and kindly led out of this world to face his judgment. But we all know that there’s no king so great that, while he walks this earth, no matter how relaxed he may seem or how strong an army he has to protect him, he is still very aware—though he might try to distract himself with other activities—that he cannot escape. And he knows very well that he already has a death sentence hanging over him, and that he will indeed die. Although he hopes for a long delay before his execution, he can never really know how soon it will come. So, unless he’s a fool, he can never be without fear that either tomorrow or even today, the grim and cruel hangman Death, who has always been lurking in the background, will not show him any respect or kindly ask him to step forward. Instead, Death will seize him fiercely by the chest, make his bones rattle, and after a long and painful struggle, strike him dead in his prison. Then he will make sure his body is thrown into a filthy pit in some corner, where it will rot and be consumed by the wretched worms of the earth, sending his soul out into a far more terrifying judgment. The outcome of that judgment at his temporal death is uncertain, and so, though by God’s grace he may hold onto some hope, in the meantime he lives in great dread and fear, and perhaps in inevitable peril of eternal fire, too.
Methinketh therefore, cousin, that, as I told you, this keeping of every man in this wretched world for execution of death is a very plain imprisonment indeed. And it is, as I say, such that the greatest king is in this prison in much worse case, for all his wealth, than is many a man who, in the other imprisonment, is sore and hardly handled. For while some of those lie not there attainted nor condemned to death, the greatest man of this world and the most wealthy in this universal prison is laid in to be kept undoubtedly for death.
I believe, cousin, that as I mentioned before, keeping everyone in this miserable world awaiting execution is really just a clear kind of imprisonment. In fact, the most powerful king is in this prison in a much worse situation, despite all his wealth, than many who are unjustly and harshly treated in another form of imprisonment. Some of those people may not even be guilty or sentenced to death, while the most important and richest person in this world is definitely locked away waiting for death.
VINCENT: But yet, uncle, in that case is the other prisoner too, for he is as sure that he shall die, perdy.
VINCENT: But uncle, in that case, the other prisoner feels the same way, because he is just as sure that he will die, for sure.
ANTHONY: This is very true, cousin, indeed, and well objected too. But then you must consider that he is not in danger of death by reason of the prison into which he is put peradventure but for a little brawl, but his danger of death is by the other imprisonment, by which he is prisoner in the great prison of this whole earth, in which prison all the princes of the world be prisoners as well as he.
ANTHONY: This is definitely true, cousin, and a valid point as well. But you have to think about the fact that he’s not facing death because of the jail he's in, which is probably just for a small fight. His real danger of dying comes from being trapped in the larger prison of this entire world, where all the princes are also prisoners, just like him.
If a man condemned to death were put up in a large prison, and while his execution were respited he were, for fighting with his fellows, put up in a strait place, part of that prison, then would he be in danger of death in that strait prison, but not by the being in that, for there is he but for the brawl. But his deadly imprisonment was the other—the larger, I say, into which he was put for death. So the prisoner that you speak of is, beside the narrow prison, a prisoner of the broad world, and all the princes of the world are prisoners there with him. And by that imprisonment both they and he are in like danger of death, not by that strait imprisonment that is commonly called imprisonment, but by that imprisonment which, because of the large walk, men call liberty—and which you therefore thought but a sophistical fancy to prove it a prison at all!
If a man sentenced to death was placed in a large prison, and while his execution was paused, he got into a fight with other inmates and was then put into a confined area of that prison, he would be in danger of death in that confined space, but not because of being there; he is there because of the fight. His actual deadly sentence is in the larger prison I mentioned, where he was originally sent to await death. So, the prisoner you’re referring to is not just in the narrow prison, but is also a prisoner of the broader world, and all the rulers of that world are prisoners there with him. Because of this broader imprisonment, both they and he are equally at risk of death, not from the confined space that we typically think of as imprisonment, but from that imprisonment which, due to its expansive nature, people describe as liberty—and which you thought was just a clever argument to suggest it was a form of imprisonment at all!
But now may you, methinketh, very plainly perceive that this whole earth is not only for all the whole of mankind a very plain prison indeed, but also that all men without exception (even those that are most at their liberty in it, and reckon themselves great lords and possessors of very great pieces of it, and thereby wax with wantonness so forgetful of their state that they think they stand in great wealth) do stand for all that indeed, by reason of their imprisonment in this large prison of the whole earth, in the selfsame condition that the others do stand who, in the narrow prisons which alone are called prisons, and which alone are reputed prisons in the opinion of the common people, stand in the most fearful and in the most odious case—that is, condemned already to death.
But now you might very clearly see that this entire earth is not just a plain prison for all of humanity, but that all people, without exception (even those who feel the most free, consider themselves powerful, and think they own large parts of it, becoming so indulgent that they forget their true situation and believe they are quite wealthy), are, in reality, in the same condition as those who are in the small prisons that everyone recognizes as prisons. These latter individuals are in the most fearful and disgraceful situation—that is, they are already condemned to death.
And now, cousin, if this thing that I tell you seem but a sophistical fancy of your mind, I would be glad to know what moveth you so to think. For, in good faith, as I have told you twice, I am no wiser but what I verily think that it is very plain truth indeed.
And now, cousin, if what I'm telling you seems like just a clever trick of your imagination, I’d really like to know why you think that. Honestly, as I've told you twice before, I’m no smarter; I truly believe that it’s very clear truth.
XX
VINCENT: In good faith, uncle, thus far I not only cannot make resistance against it with any reason, but also I see very clearly proved that it cannot be otherwise. For every man must be in this world a very prisoner, since we are all put here into a sure hold to be kept till we be put unto execution, as folk all already condemned to death.
VINCENT: In good faith, uncle, so far I can't argue against it with any reason, and I clearly see that it cannot be different. Every person must be a prisoner in this world because we're all placed here in a secure hold to wait until we're executed, like people who are already sentenced to death.
But yet, uncle, the strait-keeping, collaring, bolting, and stocking, with lying on straw or on the cold ground (which manner of hard handling is used in these special imprisonments that alone are commonly called by that name) must needs make that imprisonment much more odious and dreadful than the general imprisonment with which we are every man universally imprisoned at large, walking where we will round about the wide world. For in this broad prison, outside of those narrow prisons, there is no such hard handling used with the prisoners.
But, uncle, the strict restrictions, being restrained, locked up, and having to sleep on straw or the cold ground (which is the kind of harsh treatment typically found in these specific prisons that are known by that name) must make that imprisonment much more unpleasant and terrifying than the general imprisonment we all experience, where we can walk freely around the wide world. Because in this vast prison, outside of those narrow prisons, there isn't that kind of harsh treatment applied to the prisoners.
ANTHONY: I said, I think, cousin, that I purposed to prove to you further that in this general prison—the large prison, I mean, of this whole world—folk are, for the time that they are in it, as sore handled and as hardly, and wrenched and wrung and broken in such painful wise, that our hearts (save that we consider it not) have with reason good and great cause to grudge against the hard handling that there is in this prison—and, as far as pertaineth only to the respect of pain, as much horror to conceive against it—as against the other that there is in that one.
ANTHONY: I believe, cousin, that I intended to show you further that in this general prison—the vast prison, I mean, of this whole world—people are, while they are in it, treated so harshly and are twisted, wrung, and broken in such painful ways that our hearts (unless we ignore it) have every right to resent the harsh treatment in this prison—and, when it comes to pain, we have just as much reason to be horrified by it as we do about the other kind of suffering that exists.
VINCENT: Indeed, uncle, it is true that you said you would prove this.
VINCENT: Yes, uncle, it's true that you said you would prove this.
ANTHONY: Nay, so much said I not, cousin! But I said that I would if I could, and if I could not, then would I therein give over my part. But I trust, cousin, that I shall not need to do that—the thing seemeth to me so plain.
ANTHONY: No, I didn't say that, cousin! What I said was that I would if I could, and if I couldn't, then I would give up my part. But I believe, cousin, that I won’t need to do that—the situation seems so clear to me.
For, cousin, not only the prince and king but also the chief jailor over this whole broad prison the world (though he have both angels and devils who are jailors under him) is, I take it, God. And that I suppose you will grant me, too.
For, cousin, not only the prince and king but also the chief jailer over this entire vast prison we call the world (even though he has both angels and devils as jailers under him) is, I believe, God. And I assume you’ll agree with me on this, too.
VINCENT: That will I not deny, uncle.
VINCENT: I won’t deny that, uncle.
ANTHONY: If a man, cousin, be committed unto prison for no cause but to be kept, though there be never so great a charge against him, yet his keeper, if he be good and honest, is neither so cruel as to pain the man out of malice, nor so covetous as to put him to pain to make him seek his friends and pay for a pennyworth of ease. If the place be such that he is sure to keep him safe otherwise, or if he can get surety for the recompense of more harm than he seeth he should have if he escaped, he will never handle him in any such hard fashion as we most abhor imprisonment for. But marry, if the place be such that the keeper cannot otherwise be sure, then is he compelled to keep him to that extent the straiter. And also if the prisoner be unruly and fall to fighting with his fellows or do some other manner of ill turns, then useth the keeper to punish him in some such fashions as you yourself have spoken of.
ANTHONY: If a man, cousin, is locked up in prison without any real reason other than to be confined, even if there are serious charges against him, his jailer, if he's a good and honest person, won't be so cruel as to torture the man out of spite, nor so greedy as to make him suffer just to force him to reach out to friends and pay for a little bit of comfort. If the facility is safe enough that he can ensure the man is secure, or if he can arrange a guarantee for more damage than he believes the man would experience if he escaped, he won't treat him in any harsh way, which is what we truly dislike about imprisonment. However, if the situation is such that the jailer can't be sure otherwise, then he has to keep him in a stricter manner. And if the prisoner is unruly and starts fighting with others or engaging in other kinds of bad behavior, then the jailer does punish him in some of the ways you've mentioned.
Now, cousin, God—the chief jailor, as I say, of this broad prison the world—is neither cruel nor covetous. And this prison is also so sure and so subtly built that, albeit that it lieth open on every side without any wall in the world, yet, wander we never so far about in it, we shall never find the way to get out. So God neither needeth to collar us nor to stock us for any fear of our escaping away. And therefore, unless he see some other cause than only our keeping for death, he letteth us in the meanwhile, for as long as he pleases to respite us, walk about in the prison and do there what we will, using ourselves in such wise as he hath, by reason and revelation, from time to time told us his pleasure.
Now, cousin, God—the main warden, as I like to put it, of this vast prison called the world—is neither cruel nor greedy. This prison is designed so cleverly that, even though it is completely open on all sides with no walls, no matter how far we wander within it, we’ll never find a way out. So God doesn’t need to restrain us or keep us locked up out of fear that we’ll escape. And because of this, unless He sees some reason beyond just keeping us until death, He allows us, for as long as He wants, to roam around the prison and do as we please, engaging in the things He has, through reason and revelation, at various times communicated to us.
And hence it cometh, lo, that by reason of this favour for a time we wax, as I said, so wanton, that we forget where we are. And we think that we are lords at large, whereas we are indeed, if we would consider, even poor wretches in prison. For, of very truth, our very prison this earth is. And yet we apportion us out divers parts of it diversely to ourselves, part by covenants that we make among ourselves, and part by fraud and violence too. And we change its name from the odious name of prison, and call it our own land and our livelihood. Upon our prison we build; our prison we garnish with gold and make it glorious. In this prison they buy and sell; in this prison they brawl and chide. In this they run together and fight; in this they dice; in this they play at cards. In this they pipe and revel; in this they sing and dance. And in this prison many a man who is reputed right honest forbeareth not, for his pleasure in the dark, privily to play the knave.
And so it happens that, because of this blessing for a time, we become, as I mentioned, so carefree that we lose sight of where we are. We believe we are free and in charge, while we are really just unfortunate souls trapped in a prison. Truly, this earth is our prison. Yet, we assign various parts of it to ourselves in different ways, some through agreements we make and others through deceit and force. We change its name from the unpleasant reality of prison and call it our homeland and our livelihood. We build on this prison; we decorate our prison with gold and make it beautiful. In this prison, people buy and sell; in this prison, they argue and fight. Here, they crowd together and brawl; here, they gamble; here, they play cards. Here, they sing and party; here, they dance and celebrate. And in this prison, many who are seen as completely honest still indulge in secret mischief for their own pleasure.
And thus, while God our king and our chief jailor too, suffereth us and letteth us alone, we think ourselves at liberty. And we abhor the state of those whom we call prisoners, taking ourselves for no prisoners at all. In this false persuasion of wealth and forgetfulness of our own wretched state, which is but a wandering about for a while in this prison of this world, till we be brought unto the execution of death, we forget in our folly both ourselves and our jail, and our under-jailors the angels and devils both, and our chief jailor God too—God, who forgetteth not us, but seeth us all the while well enough. And being sore discontent to see so ill rule kept in the jail, he sendeth the hangman Death to put some to execution here and there, sometimes by the thousands at once. And he handleth many of the rest, whose execution he forbeareth yet unto a farther time, even as hardly and punisheth them as sorely, in this common prison of the world, as there are any handled in those special prisons which, for the hard handling used in them, you say your heart hath in such horror and so sore abhorreth.
And so, while God, our king and our main jailer, lets us be and ignores us, we think we are free. We look down on those we consider prisoners, thinking we aren’t prisoners ourselves. In this misleading belief of wealth and forgetfulness of our own miserable situation, which is just wandering around for a while in this world’s prison until we face death, we foolishly forget both ourselves and our prison, as well as our under-jailers, the angels and devils, and even our main jailer, God—who hasn’t forgotten us but sees us clearly all the time. And being quite unhappy about the poor management in this jail, He sends the hangman, Death, to execute some inmates here and there, sometimes in groups of thousands all at once. He treats many others, whose execution He postpones for a later time, just as harshly and punishes them as severely in this common prison of the world as those who are mistreated in the special prisons that you say your heart finds so horrifying and detests.
VINCENT: The rest will I not gainsay, for methinketh I see it so indeed. But that God, our chief jailor in this world, useth any such prisonly fashion of punishment, that point must I needs deny. For I see him neither lay any man in the stocks, nor strike fetters on his legs, nor so much as shut him up in a chamber, neither.
VINCENT: I can't argue with the rest because I really think that's how it is. But I must say I don't believe that God, our main jailer in this world, punishes us in any such prison-like way. I see Him neither putting anyone in stocks, nor chaining their legs, nor even shutting them up in a room.
ANTHONY: Is he no minstrel, cousin, who playeth not on a harp? Maketh no man melody but he who playeth on a lute? He may be a minstrel and make melody, you know, with some other instrument—a strange-fashioned one, peradventure, that never was seen before.
ANTHONY: Isn't he a minstrel, cousin, if he doesn't play a harp? Doesn't anyone create music except for those who play a lute? He might still be a minstrel and make music, you know, with some other instrument—perhaps a strange one that has never been seen before.
God, our chief jailor, as he himself is invisible, so useth he in his punishments invisible instruments. And therefore are they not of like fashion as those the other jailors use, but yet of like effect, and as painful in feeling as those. For he layeth one of his prisoners with a hot fever as ill at ease in a warm bed as the other jailor layeth his on the cold ground. He wringeth them by the brows with a migraine; he collareth them by the neck with a quinsy; he bolteth them by the arms with a palsy, so that they cannot lift their hands to their head; he manacleth their hands with the gout in their fingers; he wringeth them by the legs with the cramp in their shins; he bindeth them to the bed with the crick in the back; and he layeth one there at full length, as unable to rise as though he lay fast by the feet in the stocks.
God, our main jailer, is invisible himself, so he uses invisible tools for punishment. Thus, they are not the same as those used by other jailers, but they have a similar effect and are just as painful. He imposes a hot fever on one of his prisoners, making them as uncomfortable in a warm bed as another jailer does with his on the cold ground. He torments them with a migraine; he suffocates them with a sore throat; he confines them with a paralysis that prevents them from raising their hands to their heads; he shackles their hands with gout in their fingers; he wrings their legs with cramps in their shins; he ties them to the bed with a backache; and he lays one down flat, unable to rise as if they were locked in stocks by their feet.
A prisoner of another jail may sing and dance in his two fetters, and fear not his feet for stumbling at a stone, while God's prisoner, who hath his one foot fettered with the gout, lieth groaning on a couch, and quaketh and crieth out if he fear that there would fall on his foot no more than a cushion.
A prisoner in another jail can sing and dance with his two shackles, without worrying about tripping over a stone, while God's prisoner, who has one foot bound by gout, lies groaning on a couch, trembling and crying out at the thought of something as soft as a cushion falling on his foot.
And therefore, cousin, as I said, if we consider it well, we shall find this general prison of this whole earth a place in which the prisoners are as sore handled as they are in the other. And even in the other some make as merry too as there do some in this one, who are very merry at large out of that. And surely as we think ourselves out of prison now, so if there were some folk born and brought up in a prison, who never came on the wall or looked out at the door or heard of another world outside, but saw some, for ill turns done among themselves, locked up in a straiter room; and if they heard them alone called prisoners who were so served and themselves ever called free folk at large; the like opinion would they have there of themselves then as we have here of ourselves now. And when we take ourselves for other than prisoners now, verily are we now as deceived as those prisoners would be then.
And so, cousin, as I mentioned, if we really think about it, we’ll see that the entire world is like a big prison where the inmates are treated just as badly as they are in the other. And even in that one, some people can have fun just like some do here, who are very happy being free outside of that one. And just as we believe we’re free from prison now, if there were people born and raised in a prison who never saw the walls or looked out the door or heard of another world outside, but only saw some of their own, for bad behavior, locked up in a smaller room; and if they only ever heard those people called prisoners while they were called free, they would think of themselves in the same way we think of ourselves now. And when we see ourselves as anything other than prisoners now, we are truly as misled as those prisoners would be then.
VINCENT: I cannot, uncle, in good faith deny that you have performed all that you promised. But yet, since, for all this, there appeareth no more but that as they are prisoners so are we too, and that as some of them are sore handled so are some of us too; we know well, for all this, that when we come to those prisons we shall not fail to be in a straiter prison than we are now, and to have a door shut upon us where we have none shut upon us now. This shall we be sure of at least if there come no worse—and then there may come worse, you know well, since it cometh there so commonly. And therefore is it yet little marvel that men's hearts grudge much against it.
VINCENT: I can’t, uncle, in good conscience deny that you’ve done everything you promised. But still, the reality is that just like they are prisoners, so are we; and just like some of them are being treated poorly, so are some of us. We know very well that when we get to those prisons, we will definitely end up in an even tighter confinement than we are in now, and we’ll have a door closed on us where we currently have none closed. At least we can be sure of that, unless something worse happens—and, as you know, worse can often happen there. So it’s no wonder that people feel really frustrated about it.
ANTHONY: Surely, cousin, in this you say very well. Howbeit, your words would have touched me somewhat the nearer if I had said that imprisonment were no displeasure at all. But the thing that I say, cousin, for our comfort in the matter, is that our fancy frameth us a false opinion by which we deceive ourselves and take it for sorer than it is. And that we do because we take ourselves for more free before than we were, and imprisonment for a stranger thing to us than it is indeed. And thus far, as I say, I have proved truth in very deed.
ANTHONY: Look, cousin, you make a good point here. However, I would have felt a bit more moved if I had said that being imprisoned isn’t really a big deal at all. But what I’m saying, cousin, for our comfort in this situation, is that our imaginations create a false perception that tricks us into thinking it’s worse than it actually is. We think of ourselves as more free than we really were, and we see imprisonment as something more unfamiliar than it truly is. And so far, as I’m stating, I’ve shown that this is indeed the truth.
But now the incommodities that you repeat again—those, I say, that are proper to the imprisonment of its own nature; that is, to have less room to walk and to have the door shut upon us—these are, methinketh, so very slender and slight that in so great a cause as to suffer for God's sake we might be sore ashamed so much as once to think upon them.
But now the inconveniences you keep mentioning—those, I say, that come with being imprisoned by its very nature; that is, having less space to move around and having the door closed on us—these seem to me so trivial and minor that, in such a significant cause as suffering for God, we should be deeply ashamed even to think about them.
Many a good man there is, you know, who, without any force at all, or any necessity wherefor he should do so, suffereth these two things willingly of his own choice, with much other hardness more. Holy monks, I mean, of the Charterhouse order, such as never pass their cells save only to the church, which is set fast by their cells, and thence to their cells again. And St. Brigit's order, and St. Clare's much alike, and in a manner all enclosed religious houses. And yet anchorites and anchoresses most especially, all whose whole room is less than a good large chamber. And yet are they there as well content many long years together as are other men—and better, too—who walk about the world. And therefore you may see that the lothness of less room and the door shut upon us, since so many folk are so well content with them and will for God's love choose to live so, is but a horror enhanced of our own fancy.
There are many good people who, without any pressure or need, willingly endure these two things by their own choice, along with a lot of other hardships. I’m talking about holy monks from the Charterhouse order, who only leave their cells to go to the church nearby and then back to their cells again. This is also true for followers of St. Brigit and St. Clare, and for nearly all enclosed religious communities. Especially anchorites and anchoresses, whose entire space is smaller than a good-sized room. Yet they are just as satisfied staying there for many years as others are—if not more—who go about in the world. So, you can see that the discomfort of limited space and being confined is really just a fear we create in our minds, since so many people are perfectly happy with it and choose to live this way for the love of God.
And indeed I knew a woman once who came into a prison, to visit of her charity a poor prisoner there. She found him in a chamber that was fair enough, to say the truth—at least, it was strong enough! But with mats of straw the prisoner had made it so warm, both under foot and round about the walls, that in these things, for the keeping of his health, she was on his behalf very glad and very well comforted. But among many other displeasures that for his sake she was sorry for, one she lamented much in her mind. And that was that he should have the chamber door made fast upon him by night, by the jailor who was to shut him in. "For, by my troth," quoth she, "if the door should be shut upon me, I think it would stop up my breath!" At that word of hers the prisoner laughed in his mind—but he dared not laugh aloud or say anything to her, for indeed he stood somewhat in awe of her, and he had his food there in great part of her charity for alms. But he could not but laugh inwardly, for he knew well enough that she used to shut her own chamber door full surely on the inside every night, both door and windows too, and used not to open them all the long night. And what difference, then, as to the stopping of the breath, whether they were shut up within or without?
And actually, I once knew a woman who went into a prison to visit a poor inmate out of charity. She found him in a room that was pretty decent, to be honest—at least, it was strong enough! But the prisoner had made it so warm with straw mats underfoot and around the walls that she felt very glad and comforted about his health. However, among the many other troubles she felt for him, one thing bothered her a lot. That was the fact that the jailer would lock the door at night when he was put inside. "Because, honestly," she said, "if that door were shut on me, I think it would take my breath away!" When she said this, the prisoner couldn’t help but laugh inside, but he didn’t dare laugh out loud or say anything to her because he felt a bit intimidated by her, and he relied on her charity for most of his food. Still, he couldn't help but chuckle internally, knowing that she always locked her own room from the inside every night, both the door and windows, without opening them until morning. So what was the difference in terms of holding one’s breath, whether they were locked in from the outside or the inside?
And so surely, cousin, these two things that you speak of are neither one of so great weight that in Christ's cause they ought to move a Christian man. And one of the twain is so very childish a fancy, that in a matter almost of three chips (unless it were a chance of fire) it should never move any man.
And so, cousin, these two things you mention aren't significant enough to affect a Christian man when it comes to Christ's cause. One of them is such a trivial idea that, in a situation almost as insignificant as three chips (unless there was a chance of fire), it shouldn't affect anyone at all.
As for those other accidents of hard handling, I am not so mad as to say that they are no grief, but I say that our fear may imagine them much greater grief than they are. And I say that such as they be, many a man endureth them—yea, and many a woman too—who afterward fareth full well.
As for those other mishaps from rough treatment, I'm not crazy enough to claim they don't cause pain, but I believe our fear can make them seem much worse than they really are. And I say that, as they are, many men endure them—yes, and many women too—who end up doing just fine later on.
And then would I know what determination we take—whether for our Saviour's sake to suffer some pain in our bodies, since he suffered in his blessed body so great pain for us, or else to give him warning and be at a point utterly to forsake him rather than to suffer any pain at all? He who cometh in his mind unto this latter point—from which kind of unkindness God keep every man!—he needeth no comfort, for he will flee the need. And counsel, I fear, availeth him little, if grace be so far gone from him. But, on the other hand, if, rather than to forsake our Saviour, we determine ourselves to suffer any pain at all, I cannot then see that the fear of hard handling should anything stick with us and make us to shrink so that we would rather forsake his faith than suffer for his sake so much as imprisonment. For the handling is neither such in prison but what many men, and many women too, live with it many years and sustain it, and afterward yet fare full well. And yet it may well fortune that, beside the bare imprisonment, there shall happen to us no hard handling at all. Or else it may happen to us for only a short while—and yet, beside all this, peradventure not at all. And which of all these ways shall be taken with us, lieth all in his will for whom we are content to take it, and who for that intent of ours favoureth us and will suffer no man to put more pain to us than he well knoweth we shall be able to bear. For he himself will give us the strength for it, as you have heard his promise already by the mouth of St. Paul: "God is faithful, who suffereth you not to be tempted above what you may bear, but giveth also with the temptation a way out."
And then I'd understand what decision we're making—whether we're willing to endure some pain in our bodies for the sake of our Savior, since he suffered so much in his blessed body for us, or if we’d rather abandon him completely to avoid any suffering at all. Anyone who reaches the point of turning away from him—God forbid that happens to anyone!—doesn’t need any comfort because they’ll run from need. And I'm afraid that advice won’t help them much if they’ve strayed too far from grace. But on the flip side, if we choose to endure any pain instead of abandoning our Savior, I don’t see how the fear of harsh treatment should trouble us to the point where we’d give up our faith to avoid even imprisonment. After all, the conditions in prison aren't so bad that many people, both men and women, haven’t endured it for years and come out just fine afterward. It’s also likely that, apart from the mere imprisonment, we might not face any harsh treatment at all, or if we do, it could be only for a short time—and perhaps not at all. Ultimately, which of these paths we take is all in the hands of the One for whom we're willing to bear it, and who supports us and ensures that no one causes us more pain than we can handle. Because he himself will give us the strength to manage it, as you’ve already heard his promise through St. Paul: "God is faithful, who doesn’t allow you to be tempted beyond what you can bear, but also provides a way out alongside the temptation."
But now, if we have not lost our faith already before we come to forsake it for fear, we know very well by our faith that, by the forsaking of our faith, we fall into that state to be cast into the prison of hell. And that can we not tell how soon; but, as it may be that God will suffer us to live a while here upon earth, so may it be that he will throw us into that dungeon beneath before the time that the Turk shall once ask us the question. And therefore, if we fear imprisonment so sore, we are much more than mad if we fear not most the imprisonment that is far more sore. For out of that prison shall no man ever get, and in this other shall no man abide but a while.
But now, if we haven't lost our faith before we turn away from it out of fear, we know very well that by abandoning our faith, we risk falling into the prison of hell. We can't say how soon that could happen; however, just as God might allow us to live here on earth for a while, He might also cast us into that dungeon below before the Turk even asks us about it. So, if we are so afraid of imprisonment here, we are even more foolish if we don’t fear the much worse imprisonment in hell. Because once you're in that prison, no one can escape, while in this other one, people can only stay for a limited time.
In prison was Joseph while his brethren were at large; and yet afterward were his brethren fain to seek upon him for bread. In prison was Daniel, and the wild lions about him; and yet even there God kept him harmless and brought him safe out again. If we think that he will not do the like for us, let us not doubt that he will do for us either the like or better, for better may he do for us if he suffer us there to die. St. John the Baptist was, you know, in prison, while Herod and Herodias sat full merry at the feast, and the daughter of Herodias delighted them with her dancing, till with her dancing she danced off St. John's head. And now sitteth he with great feast in heaven at God's board, while Herod and Herodias full heavily sit in hell burning both twain, and to make them sport withal the devil with the damsel dance in the fire before them.
In prison was Joseph while his brothers were free; yet later, his brothers needed to come to him for food. In prison was Daniel, surrounded by wild lions; still, God kept him safe and brought him out unharmed. If we think He won’t do the same for us, let’s believe that He will do either the same or even better, because He might have a greater plan for us, even if it means we have to face death. St. John the Baptist, as you know, was in prison while Herod and Herodias enjoyed themselves at a feast, with Herodias’s daughter entertaining them with her dance, until her dance led to the beheading of St. John. Now, he sits at a grand feast in heaven at God’s table, while Herod and Herodias sit in torment in hell, suffering together; and to add to their misery, the devil makes the girl dance in the fire before them.
Finally, cousin, to finish this piece, our Saviour was himself taken prisoner for our sake. And prisoner was he carried, and prisoner was he kept, and prisoner was he brought forth before Annas, and prisoner from Annas carried unto Caiphas. Then prisoner was he carried from Caiphas unto Pilate, and prisoner was he sent from Pilate to King Herod, and prisoner from Herod unto Pilate again. And so was he kept as prisoner to the end of his passion. The time of his imprisonment, I grant you, was not long. But as for hard handling, which our hearts most abhor, he had as much in that short while as many men among them all in a much longer time. And surely, then, if we consider of what estate he was and also that he was prisoner in that wise for our sake, we shall, I think, unless we be worse than wretched beasts, never so shamefully play the ungrateful coward as sinfully to forsake him for fear of imprisonment.
Finally, cousin, to wrap this up, our Savior was taken prisoner for our sake. He was imprisoned, held captive, and brought before Annas as a prisoner, then carried from Annas to Caiphas. After that, he was taken from Caiphas to Pilate, and from Pilate to King Herod, and then back to Pilate again. He was kept a prisoner until the end of his suffering. I acknowledge that his time in captivity wasn’t long, but in terms of harsh treatment, which we despise most, he endured as much in that brief period as many others experience over a much longer time. Surely, if we consider his condition and the fact that he was imprisoned in this way for us, we should never, unless we are worse than miserable beasts, shamefully act like ungrateful cowards by abandoning him out of fear of imprisonment.
Nor shall we be so foolish either as, by forsaking him, to give him the occasion to forsake us in turn. For so should we, with the avoiding of an easier prison, fall into a worse. And instead of the prison that cannot keep us long, we should fall into that prison out of which we can never come, though the short imprisonment should have won us everlasting liberty.
Nor should we be so foolish as to turn our backs on him, giving him a reason to turn his back on us. By trying to escape a lighter prison, we would end up in a worse one. Instead of the prison that can’t hold us for long, we would end up in a prison from which we can never escape, even though the brief confinement might have earned us everlasting freedom.
XXI
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, if we feared not further, beside imprisonment, the terrible dart of shameful and painful death, I would verily trust that, as for imprisonment, remembering these things which I have here heard from you (our Lord reward you for them!) rather than that I should forsake the faith of our Saviour, I would with help of grace never shrink at it.
VINCENT: Truly, uncle, if we weren't afraid of anything beyond imprisonment, like the awful sting of a shameful and painful death, I would honestly believe that, as for imprisonment, remembering the things I’ve heard from you (may our Lord reward you for them!), I would never waver in my faith in our Savior, with the help of grace.
But now are we come, uncle, with much work at last unto the last and uttermost point of the dread that maketh this incursion of this midday devil—this open invasion of the Turk and his persecution against the faith—seem so terrible unto men's minds. Although the respect of God vanquish all the rest of the trouble that we have hitherto perused (as loss of goods, lands, and liberty), yet, when we remember the terror of shameful and painful death, that point suddenly putteth us in oblivion of all that should be our comfort. And we feel (all men, I fear me, for the most part) the fervour of our faith wax so cold and our hearts so faint that we find ourselves at the point of falling even for fear.
But now, uncle, we’ve finally arrived at the last and most extreme point of the fear that makes this midday devil—this open invasion by the Turk and his persecution against our faith—seem so terrifying to people. Even though the fear of God overcomes all the other troubles we’ve faced (like losing our belongings, land, and freedom), still, when we think about the terror of a shameful and painful death, that thought quickly makes us forget everything that should comfort us. And we feel (I fear most people do) our faith growing so cold and our hearts so weak that we find ourselves on the brink of collapsing from fear.
ANTHONY: I deny not, cousin, that indeed in this point is the sore pinch. And yet you see, for all this, that even this point too taketh increase or diminishment of dread according to the difference of the affections that are beforehand fixed and rooted in the mind—so much so, that you may see a man set so much by his worldly substance that he feareth less the loss of his life than the loss of lands. Yea, you may see a man abide deadly torment, such as some other man had rather die than endure, rather than to bring out the money that he hath hid. And I doubt not but that you have heard by right authentic stories of many men who (some for one cause, some for another) have not hesitated willingly to suffer death, divers in divers kinds, and some both with despiteful rebuke and painful torment too. And therefore, as I say, we may see that the affection of the mind toward the increase or decrease of dread maketh much of the matter.
ANTHONY: I won't deny, cousin, that this is indeed a serious issue. But as you can see, even this concern changes in intensity depending on the different feelings that are already fixed and established in the mind. It's incredible how some people value their possessions so much that they fear losing their property more than losing their lives. You can see someone endure terrible pain—something that another person would rather die than go through—just to keep the money they've buried. And I'm sure you've heard authentic stories of many individuals who, for various reasons, were willing to face death, in many different forms, and some did so with scornful insults and painful suffering. So, as I mentioned, the feelings in the mind about how much fear to experience greatly influence the situation.
Now the affections of men's minds are imprinted by divers means. One way is by means of the bodily senses, moved by such things, pleasant or unpleasant, as are outwardly offered unto them through sensible worldly things. And this manner of receiving the impression of affections is common unto men and beasts. Another manner of receiving affections is by means of reason, which both ordinately tempereth those affections that the five bodily senses imprint, and also disposeth a man many times to some spiritual virtues very contrary to those affections that are fleshly and sensual. And those reasonable dispositions are spiritual affections, and proper to the nature of man, and above the nature of beasts. Now, as our ghostly enemy the devil enforceth himself to make us lean to the sensual affections and beastly, so doth almighty God of his goodness by his Holy Spirit inspire us good motions, with the aid and help of his grace, toward the other spiritual affections. And by sundry means he instructeth our reason to lean to them, and not only to receive them as engendered and planted in our soul, but also in such wise to water them with the wise advertisement of godly counsel and continual prayer, that they may become habitually radicated and surely take deep root therein. And according as the one kind of affection or the other beareth the strength in our heart, so are we stronger or feebler against the terror of death in this cause.
Now, people's feelings are shaped in different ways. One way is through the bodily senses, influenced by things that are either pleasant or unpleasant, presented to them through tangible experiences in the world. This kind of receiving emotional impressions is common to both humans and animals. Another way to receive emotions is through reasoning, which not only tempers the feelings that the five senses bring but also often encourages a person towards spiritual virtues that are quite the opposite of those fleshly and sensory desires. These rational inclinations are spiritual feelings, unique to human nature and above animal instincts. Just as our spiritual enemy, the devil, tries to push us towards sensual and animalistic desires, so does Almighty God, in His goodness, inspire us with positive inclinations through His Holy Spirit, aided by His grace, towards spiritual feelings. In various ways, He guides our reasoning to favor these feelings, not only to accept them as they arise within us but also to nurture them with wise, godly advice and continuous prayer, so that they become deeply rooted in our hearts. Depending on which type of feeling is stronger within us, we become either stronger or weaker in facing the fear of death in this matter.
And therefore, cousin, will we essay to consider what things there are for which we have cause in reason to master the fearful affection and sensual. And though we cannot clean avoid it and put it away, yet will we essay in such wise to bridle it at least that it run not out so far like a headstrong horse that, in spite of our teeth, it carry us out unto the devil.
And so, cousin, let’s try to think about the things we have reason to control our fear and desires. And even though we can’t completely avoid them or push them away, we’ll at least try to rein them in so they don’t take us too far, like a wild horse that, despite our efforts, leads us into trouble.
Let us therefore now consider and well weigh this thing that we dread so sore—that is, shameful and painful death.
Let’s take a moment to think about and carefully consider this thing we fear so much—that is, a shameful and painful death.
XXII
And first I perceive well by these two things that you join unto "death"—that is, "shameful" and "painful"—that you would esteem death so much the less if it should come along without either shame or pain.
And first I clearly see from these two things you associate with "death"—that is, "shameful" and "painful"—that you would consider death much less significant if it were to come without either shame or pain.
VINCENT: Without doubt, uncle, a great deal the less. But yet, though it should come without them both, by itself, I know well many a man would be for all that very loth to die.
VINCENT: No doubt about it, uncle, a lot less. But even if it were to come without either of them, I know there are many men who would still be very unwilling to die.
ANTHONY: That I believe well, cousin, and the more pity it is. For that affection happeth in very few without the cause being either lack of faith, lack of hope, or finally lack of wit.
ANTHONY: I believe that, cousin, and it’s really unfortunate. Because that kind of affection rarely happens without a reason, whether it’s a lack of faith, a lack of hope, or ultimately a lack of sense.
Those who believe not the life to come after this, and think themselves here in wealth, are loth to leave this life, for then they think they lose all. And thence come the manifold foolish unfaithful words which are so rife in our many mouths: "This world we know, and the other we know not." And some say in sport (and think in earnest), "The devil is not so black as he is painted," and "Let him be as black as he will, he is no blacker than a crow!" with many such other foolish fancies of the same sort.
Those who don’t believe in life after this one and see themselves as wealthy here are reluctant to leave this life because they think they lose everything. This leads to the many foolish and unfaithful statements that are so common in our conversations: “We know this world, but we don’t know the next.” Some jokingly say (while believing it to be true), “The devil isn’t as bad as people say,” and “Even if he is, he can’t be worse than a crow!” along with many other silly ideas of the same kind.
There are some who believe well enough but who, through lewdness of living, fall out of good hope of salvation. And then I very little marvel that they are loth to die. Howbeit, some who purpose to mend and would fain have some time left them longer to bestow somewhat better, may peradventure be loth to die also forthwith. And albeit that a very good will gladly to die and to be with God would be, to my mind, so thankful that it would be well able to purchase as full remission both of sin and pain as peradventure he would be like to purchase, if he lived, in many years' penance, yet will I not say but what such a kind of lothness to die may be approvable before God.
There are some who have enough faith but, due to their immoral lifestyle, lose hope for salvation. So, it's not surprising that they are reluctant to die. However, some who intend to improve themselves and wish they had more time to do better may also be hesitant to die right away. Although having the sincere desire to die and be with God is, in my opinion, a grateful wish that could lead to full forgiveness of both sin and suffering—much more than they could achieve through years of penance—still, I won’t say that this kind of reluctance to die isn’t acceptable in the eyes of God.
There are some also who are loth to die, who are yet very glad to die and long for to be dead.
There are some who are reluctant to die, yet they are very eager for death and long for it to come.
VINCENT: That would be, uncle, a very strange case!
VINCENT: That would be, uncle, a really weird situation!
ANTHONY: The case, I fear me, cousin, falleth not very often. But yet sometimes it doth, as where there is any man of that good mind that St. Paul was. For the longing that he had to be with God, he would fain have been dead, but for the profit of other folk he was content to live here in pain, and defer and forbear for the while his inestimable bliss in heaven: "Desiderium habens dissolvi et esse cum Christo, multo magis melius, permanere autem in carne, necessarium propter vos."
ANTHONY: I’m afraid, cousin, that this doesn’t happen very often. But sometimes it does, like with a person who has a good heart like St. Paul. He longed to be with God so much that he wished he could be dead, but for the sake of others, he was willing to endure the pain of living here and to postpone his incredible joy in heaven: "Desiring to depart and be with Christ, which is far better; nevertheless, to remain in the flesh is more necessary for you."
But of all these kinds of folk, cousin, who are loth to die (except for the first kind only, who lack faith), there is I suppose none who would hesitate, for the bare respect of death alone, unless the fear of shame or sharp pain joined unto death should be the hindrance, to depart hence with good will in this case of the faith. For he would well know by his faith that his death, taken for the faith, should cleanse him clean of all his sins and send him straight to heaven. And some of these (namely the last kind) are such that shame and pain both joined unto death would be unlikely to make them loathe death or fear death so sore but what they would suffer death in this case with good will, since they know well that the refusing of the faith, for any cause in this world (seemed the cause never so good), should yet sever them from God, with whom, save for other folk's profit, they so fain would be. And charity it cannot be, for the profit of the whole world, deadly to displease him who made it.
But of all these types of people, cousin, who are reluctant to die (except for the first type, who lack faith), I guess none would hesitate, simply out of respect for death alone, unless the fear of shame or extreme pain associated with death was the obstacle, to leave this world willingly in the case of faith. For he would understand by his faith that his death, taken for the faith, would cleanse him of all his sins and send him straight to heaven. Some of these (specifically the last type) are such that shame and pain combined with death would probably not make them dislike or fear death so much that they wouldn’t willingly accept death in this case, since they know well that refusing the faith, for any reason in this world (no matter how good it seemed), would still separate them from God, with whom, aside from other people's benefit, they would very much like to be. And it cannot be loving, for the benefit of the whole world, to offend the one who created it.
Some are these, I say also, who are loth to die for lack of wit. Albeit that they believe in the world that is to come and hope also to come thither, yet they love so much the wealth of this world and such things as delight them therein, that they would fain keep them as long as ever they can, even with tooth and nail. And when they can be suffered in no wise to keep it longer, but death taketh them from it, then, if it can be no better, they will agree to be, as soon as they be hence, hauled up into heaven and be with God forthwith! These folk as as very idiot fools as he who had kept from his childhood a bag full of cherry stones, and cast such a fancy to it that he would not go from it for a bigger bag filled with gold.
Some people, I say, are reluctant to die because they lack understanding. Even though they believe in the afterlife and hope to get there, they love the riches of this world and the pleasures it offers so much that they would do anything to hold onto them for as long as possible, fighting tooth and nail. And when they are no longer able to keep it, when death takes them away from it, then, if there’s no other choice, they will agree to be taken up to heaven and be with God right away! These people are as foolish as someone who has clung to a bag full of cherry stones since childhood, so attached to it that they wouldn’t trade it for a bigger bag full of gold.
These folk fare, cousin, as Æsop telleth in a fable that the snail did. For when Jupiter (whom the poets feign for the great god) invited all the poor worms of the earth unto a great solemn feast that it pleased him upon a time—I have forgotten upon what occasion—to prepare for them, the snail kept her at home and would not come. And when Jupiter asked her afterward wherefore she came not to his feast, where he said she would have been welcome and have fared well, and would have seen a goodly palace and been delighted with many goodly pleasures, she answered him that she loved no place so well as her own house. With this answer Jupiter waxed so angry that he said, since she loved her house so well, she should never after go from home, but should always afterward bear her house upon her back wheresoever she went. And so hath she ever done since, as they say. And at least I know well she doth so now and hath done so as long as I can remember.
These folks are like the snail in Aesop's fable, cousin. One time, when Jupiter (whom the poets describe as the great god) invited all the poor little creatures of the earth to a grand feast he was holding, the snail stayed home and didn’t show up. Later, when Jupiter asked her why she didn’t come to his feast, where he said she would have been welcomed, well-fed, and would have seen a beautiful palace with many enjoyable things, she replied that she loved her own home too much. This made Jupiter so angry that he declared since she loved her home so much, she would never leave it again and would always carry her house on her back wherever she went. And as they say, she has done just that ever since. At least, I know for sure she does that now and has for as long as I can remember.
VINCENT: Forsooth, uncle, I should think the tale were not all feigned, for I think verily that so much of your tale is true!
VINCENT: Seriously, uncle, I really believe the story isn't entirely made up, because I truly think a lot of what you said is true!
ANTHONY: Æsop meant by that feigned fable to touch the folly of such folk as so set their fancy upon some small simple pleasure that they cannot find it in their heart to forbear it, either for the pleasure of a better man or for the gaining of a better thing. For by this foolish froward fashion they sometimes fall in great disgrace and take by it no little harm.
ANTHONY: Aesop meant in that made-up fable to point out the foolishness of people who get so attached to some small, simple pleasure that they can't bring themselves to let it go, whether for the benefit of someone better or for the chance to gain something greater. Because of this silly stubbornness, they sometimes end up in serious disgrace and suffer quite a bit because of it.
And surely such Christian folk as, by their foolish affection, which they have set like the snail upon their own house here on earth, cannot, for the lothness of leaving that house, find it in their hearts to go with good will to the great feast that God prepareth in heaven and of his goodness so graciously calleth them to—they are, I fear me, unless they mend that mind in time, like to be served as the snail was, and yet much worse too. For they are like to have their house here, the earth, bound fast on their backs for ever, and not to walk with it where they will, as the snail creepeth about with hers, but to lie fast bound in the midst of it with the foul fire of hell about them. For into this folly they bring themselves by their own fault, as the drunken man bringeth himself into drunkenness, whereby the evil that he doth in his drunkenness is not forgiven him for his folly, but to his pain is imputed to his fault.
And certainly, those Christians who, due to their foolish attachment, have settled like a snail in their own earthly home can't, because of their reluctance to leave that home, find it in their hearts to joyfully attend the grand feast that God has prepared in heaven and so graciously invites them to—they are, I'm afraid, unless they change their minds in time, likely to be treated like the snail was, and even worse. They are set to carry their earthly home on their backs forever, unable to move freely like the snail does with hers, but instead to be trapped in the middle of it with the terrible flames of hell surrounding them. They bring this folly upon themselves, much like a drunk person slips into drunkenness, whereby the wrongs they commit while intoxicated are not forgiven due to their foolishness, but rather, their pain is attributed to their own fault.
VINCENT: Surely, uncle, this seemeth not unlikely, and by their fault they fall in such folly indeed. And yet, if this be folly indeed, then are some folk fools who think themselves right wise.
VINCENT: Surely, uncle, this doesn't seem unlikely, and because of their mistakes, they fall into such foolishness. And yet, if this is foolishness, then there are some people who are fools but believe they are quite wise.
ANTHONY: Who think themselves wise? Marry, I never saw a fool yet who thought himself other than wise! For as it is one spark of soberness left in a drunken head when he perceiveth himself to be drunk and getteth himself fair to bed, so if a fool perceive himself a fool that point is no folly but a little spark of wit.
ANTHONY: Who considers themselves wise? Honestly, I’ve never met a fool who didn’t think they were smart! Just like there’s a tiny bit of clarity in a drunk person’s mind when they realize they’re drunk and manage to get themselves to bed, if a fool recognizes they’re a fool, that realization isn’t foolishness but a small spark of intelligence.
But now, cousin, as for these kind of fools, who are loth to die for the love that they bear to their worldly fancies which they would, by their death, leave behind them and forsake: Those who would for that cause rather forsake the faith than die, would rather forsake it than lose their worldly goods, though there were no peril of death offered them at all. And then, as touching those who are of that mind, we have, you know, said as much as you yourself thought sufficient this afternoon here before.
But now, cousin, about those kinds of fools who are reluctant to die for the love they have for their worldly desires, which they would leave behind if they died: Those who would abandon their faith to avoid death would also rather give it up than lose their material possessions, even if there were no threat of death at all. And regarding those who think this way, we’ve already discussed as much as you felt was necessary earlier this afternoon.
VINCENT: Verily, uncle, that is very true. And now have you rehearsed, as far as I can remember, all the other kinds of them that would be loth to die for any other respect than the grievous qualities of shame and pain joined unto death. And of all these kinds, except the kind of infidelity—when no comfort can help, but only counsel to the attaining of faith, for faith must be presupposed to the receiving of comfort and had ready before, as you showed in the beginning of our communication the first day that we talked of the matter. But else, I say, except that one kind, there is none of the rest of those that were before untouched who would be likely to forsake their faith in this persecution for the fear and dread of death, save for those grievous qualities—pain, I mean, and shame—that they see well would come with it.
VINCENT: Truly, uncle, that's very true. And now, as far as I remember, have you gone over all the other types that would be reluctant to die for any reason other than the unbearable feelings of shame and pain that come with death? And of all these types, except for the type of infidelity—where no comfort can help, but only guidance towards achieving faith, since faith must be assumed to receive comfort and should be prepared in advance, as you mentioned at the start of our conversation the first day we discussed this topic. But aside from that type, I say, none of the others we haven't already talked about would likely abandon their faith during this persecution out of fear of death, except for those unbearable feelings—pain, that is, and shame—that they clearly see would accompany it.
And therefore, uncle, I pray you, give us some comfort against those twain. For in good faith, if death should come without them, in such a case at this is, in which by the losing of this life we should find a far better, mine own reason giveth me that, save for the other griefs going before the change, no man who hath wit would anything stick at all.
And so, Uncle, I ask you to give us some comfort against those two. Because honestly, if death were to come without them, in a situation like this, where losing this life would lead us to a much better one, my own reasoning tells me that aside from the other pains leading up to the change, no sane person would hesitate at all.
ANTHONY: Yes, peradventure suddenly they would, before they gather their wits unto them and well weigh the matter. But, cousin, those who will consider the matter well, reason, grounded upon the foundation of faith, shall show they very great substantial causes for which the dread of those grievous qualities that they see shall come with death—shame, I mean, and pain also—shall not so sore abash them as sinfully to drive them to that point. And for the proof thereof, let us first begin at the consideration of the shame.
ANTHONY: Yes, maybe they would suddenly, before they collect their thoughts and really think it through. But, cousin, those who take the time to consider the issue carefully, based on a foundation of faith, will show very strong reasons why the fear of those terrible things they associate with death—I'm talking about shame and pain—won't frighten them so much as to push them to that extreme. And to prove this, let's start by looking at the concept of shame.
XXIII
How can any faithful wise man dread death so sore, for any respect of shame, when his reason and his faith together can shortly make him perceive that there is no true shame in it at all? For how can that death be shameful that is glorious? Or how can it be anything but glorious to die for the faith of Christ, if we die both for the faith and in the faith, joined with hope and charity? For the scripture plainly saith, "Precious in the sight of God is the death of his saints." Now if the death of his saints be glorious in the sight of God, it can never be shameful in very deed, however shameful it seem here in the sight of men. For here we may see and be sure that not only at the death of St. Stephen, to whom it pleased him to show himself with the heaven open over his head, but at the death also of every may who so dieth for the faith, God with his heavenly company beholdeth his whole passion and verily looketh on.
How can any faithful wise person be so afraid of death, out of concern for shame, when their reason and faith can quickly show them that there’s no real shame in it at all? How can a death be shameful if it is glorious? Or how can it be anything but glorious to die for the faith of Christ, if we die for that faith and in faith, joined with hope and love? The scripture clearly says, "Precious in the sight of God is the death of his saints." If the death of his saints is glorious in God's eyes, it can never truly be shameful, no matter how shameful it may seem to others here on earth. Here, we can see and be assured that not only at the death of St. Stephen, whom God chose to reveal himself to with heaven opened above him, but also at the death of anyone who dies for the faith, God and his heavenly company witness their entire suffering and truly look on.
Now if it were so, cousin, that you should be brought through the broad high-street of a great long city; and if, all along the way that you were going, there were on one side of the way a rabble of ragged beggars and madmen, who would despise and dispraise you with all the shameful names that they could call you and all the villainous words that they could say to you; and if there were then, all along the other side of the same street where you should come by, a goodly company standing in a fair range, a row of wise and worshipful folk, lauding and commending you, more than fifteen times as many as that rabble of ragged beggars and railing madmen—would you willingly turn back, thinking that you went unto your shame, for the shameful jesting and railing of those mad foolish wretches? Or would you hold on your way with a good cheer and a glad heart, thinking yourself much honoured by the laud and approbation of that other honourable company?
Now, imagine, cousin, that you were walking down the wide main street of a big city. As you walked, on one side, there was a crowd of ragged beggars and crazy people who would insult and mock you with every terrible name and nasty word they could think of. Meanwhile, on the other side of the same street, there was a respectable group of wise and honorable people standing in a nice line, praising and commending you, and there were more than fifteen times as many of them as there were those ragged beggars and shouting madmen. Would you willingly turn back, feeling ashamed because of the cruel teasing and insults from those foolish people? Or would you keep walking with a cheerful heart, feeling truly honored by the praise and support from that other respectable group?
VINCENT: Nay, by my troth, uncle, there is no doubt but that I would much regard the commendation of those commendable folk, and regard not a rush the railing of all those ribalds.
VINCENT: No doubt about it, uncle, I really value the praise from those respectable people, and I couldn't care less about the insults from all those rascals.
ANTHONY: Then, cousin, no man who hath faith can account himself shamed here, by any manner of death that he suffereth for the faith of Christ. For however vile and shameful it seem in the sight here of a few worldly wretches, it is lauded and approved for very precious and honourable in the sight of God and all the glorious company of heaven, who as perfectly stand and behold it as those foolish people do. And they are in number more than a hundred to one; and of that hundred, every one a hundred times more to be regarded and esteemed than a hundred such whole rabbles of the other.
ANTHONY: So, cousin, no man who has faith can feel ashamed here, no matter what death he faces for the faith of Christ. Because, even if it seems vile and shameful in the eyes of a few worldly individuals, it is actually honored and valued as very precious and respectable in the eyes of God and all the glorious company of heaven, who witness it just as clearly as those foolish people do. And they are far more numerous—more than a hundred to one; and of that hundred, each one is a hundred times more worthy and esteemed than any group of a hundred of those others.
And now, if a man would be so mad as to be ashamed, for fear of the rebuke that he should have of such rebukeful beasts, to confess the faith of Christ, then, with fleeing from a shadow of shame, he would fall into a true shame—and a deadly painful shame indeed! For then hath our Saviour made a sure promise that he will show himself ashamed of that man before the Father of heaven and all his holy angels, saying in the ninth chapter of Luke, "He who is ashamed of me and my words, of him shall the Son of Man be ashamed when he shall come in the majesty of himself and of his Father and of his holy angels." And what manner of shameful shame shall that be, then? If a man's cheeks glow sometimes for shame in this world, they will fall on fire for shame when Christ shall show himself ashamed of them there!
And now, if someone is foolish enough to feel ashamed, out of fear of the criticism he might receive from those harsh critics, for admitting his faith in Christ, then by avoiding a hint of shame, he would end up in a real shame—and a truly painful one at that! For our Savior has made a clear promise that He will be ashamed of that person before the Father in heaven and all His holy angels, saying in the ninth chapter of Luke, "Whoever is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of Himself and the Father and His holy angels." And what kind of shameful shame will that be? If someone's cheeks flush with embarrassment in this world, they will burn with shame when Christ shows Himself ashamed of them there!
The blessed apostles reckoned it for great glory to suffer for Christ's faith the thing that we worldly wretched fools think to be villainy and shame. For they, when they were scourged, with despite and shame, and thereupon commanded to speak no more of the name of Christ, "went their way from the council joyful and glad that God had vouchsafed to do them the worship to suffer shameful despite for the name of Jesus." And so proud were they of the shame and villainous pain put unto them, that for all the forbidding of that great council assembled, they ceased not every day to preach out the name of Jesus still—not only in the temple, out of which they were set and whipped for the same before, but also, to double it with, they went preaching the name about from house to house, too.
The blessed apostles considered it a great honor to suffer for Christ's faith, while we, as worldly wretched fools, see it as wrong and embarrassing. When they were whipped and shamed, and then ordered not to speak of Christ's name anymore, they "went away from the council joyful and glad that God had granted them the honor of enduring shameful treatment for the name of Jesus." They were so proud of the shame and cruel suffering inflicted on them that despite the orders of that powerful council, they continued to preach the name of Jesus every day—not just in the temple, where they had been removed and beaten before, but they also went around preaching from house to house.
Since we regard so greatly the estimation of worldly folk, I wish that we would, among the many wicked things that they do, regard also some such as are good. For it is a manner among them, in many places, that some by handicraft, some by merchandise, some by other kinds of living, arise and come forward in the world. And commonly folk are in their youth set forth to suitable masters, under whom they are brought up and grow. But now, whensoever they find a servant such that he disdaineth to do such things as his master did while he was himself a servant, that servant every man accounteth for a proud unthrift, never like to come to good proof. Let us, lo, mark and consider this, and weigh it well withal: Our master Christ (who is not only the master, but the maker too, of all this whole world) was not so proud as to disdain for our sakes the most villainous and most shameful death, after the worldly count, that then was used in the world. And he endured the most despiteful mocking therewith, joined to the most grievous pain, as crowning him with sharp thorn, so that the blood ran down about his face. Then they gave him a reed in his hand for a sceptre, and kneeled down to him and saluted him like a king in scorn, and beat then the reed upon the sharp thorns about his holy head. Now our Saviour saith that the disciple or servant is not above his master. And therefore, since our master endured so many kinds of painful shame, very proud beasts may we well think ourselves if we disdain to do as our master did. And whereas he through shame ascended into glory, we would be so mad that we would rather fall into everlasting shame, both before heaven and hell, than for fear of a short worldly shame to follow him to everlasting glory.
Since we value the opinions of worldly people so much, I wish we would also acknowledge some of the good things they do among the many wicked ones. In many places, some rise in the world through craftsmanship, others through trade, and some by other means. Generally, young people are placed with suitable mentors, under whom they are raised and develop. However, whenever they find a servant who looks down on performing the tasks their master did while they were a servant, that servant is seen by everyone as a proud waste, unlikely to succeed. Let's take a moment to observe and consider this carefully: Our master Christ (who is not just the master but also the creator of this entire world) was not too proud to endure the most disgraceful and shameful death that was then considered the worst in the world. He faced mockery and excruciating pain, like being crowned with sharp thorns that made blood run down his face. They gave him a reed as a scepter, knelt before him, and mocked him as a king, then beat the reed against the sharp thorns on his holy head. Our Savior said that the disciple or servant is not above his master. Therefore, since our master endured so many forms of painful shame, we can rightly consider ourselves very proud if we refuse to do as he did. While he embraced shame to attain glory, would we be foolish enough to choose everlasting shame, both before heaven and hell, rather than risking a brief moment of worldly shame to follow him into eternal glory?
XXIV
VINCENT: In good faith, uncle, as for the shame, you shall need to take no more pains. For I suppose surely that any man who hath reason in his head shall hold himself satisfied with this.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, you don’t need to worry about the shame anymore. I believe that any reasonable person will be perfectly fine with this.
But, of truth, uncle, all the pinch is in the pain. For as for shame, I perceive well now that a man may with wisdom so master it that it shall nothing move him at all—so much so that it is become a common proverb in almost every country that "shame is as it is taken." But, by God, uncle, all the wisdom in this world can never so master pain but that pain will be painful, in spite of all the wit in this world!
But, honestly, uncle, the real issue is the pain. As for shame, I've come to realize that a person can be smart enough to control it to the point where it doesn't affect them at all—so much so that there's a saying in almost every country that "shame is how you take it." But, I swear, uncle, no amount of wisdom in this world can ever control pain enough to make it not hurt, no matter how clever you are!
ANTHONY: Truth it is, cousin, that no man can, with all the reason he hath, in such wise change the nature of pain that in the having of pain he feel it not. For unless it be felt, perdy, it is no pain. And that is the natural cause, cousin, for which a man may have his leg stricken off at the knee and it grieve him not—if his head be off but half an hour before!
ANTHONY: It's true, cousin, that no man can, no matter how reasonable he is, change the nature of pain in such a way that he doesn’t feel it while experiencing it. Because if it isn’t felt, then it’s not really pain. And that’s the natural reason, cousin, why a man can have his leg chopped off at the knee and not feel any sorrow—if his head was removed just half an hour before!
But reason may make a reasonable man not to shrink from it and refuse it to his more hurt and harm. Though he would not be so foolish as to fall into it without cause, yet upon good causes—either of gaining some kind of great profit or avoiding some kind of great loss, or eschewing thereby the suffering of far greater pain—he would be content and glad to sustain it for his far greater advantage and commodity.
But a reasonable person might not back away from it and might refuse to let it cause him more harm. Although he wouldn’t be foolish enough to get into it without a good reason, if there were good reasons—like gaining a significant profit or avoiding a major loss, or escaping a much greater pain—he would be willing and happy to endure it for his much greater benefit and advantage.
And this doth reason alone in many cases, where it hath much less help to take hold of than it hath in this matter of faith. For you know well that to take a sour and bitter potion is great grief and displeasure, and to be lanced and have the flesh cut is no little pain. Now, when such things are to be ministered either to a child or to some childish man, they will by their own wills let their sickness and their sore grow, unto their more grief, till it become incurable, rather than abide the pain of the curing in time. And that for faint heart, joined with lack of discretion. But a man who hath more wisdom, though without cause he would no more abide the pain willingly than would the other, yet, since reason showeth him what good he shall have by the suffering, and what harm by refusing it, this maketh him well content and glad also to take it.
And this often makes sense in many situations, where it has a lot less support than it does in the matter of faith. You know well that taking a sour and bitter medicine is really upsetting, and having surgery and getting cut is no small pain. Now, when such things are given to a child or someone childish, they will often choose to let their illness and pain worsen, leading to more suffering, rather than endure the pain of treatment in time. This is due to a timid heart combined with a lack of judgment. However, a person who is wiser, even though he wouldn’t willingly endure the pain any more than the other, understands that reason shows him the benefits he’ll gain from the suffering and the harm from refusing it, which makes him willing and even happy to accept it.
Now then, if reason alone be sufficient to move a man to take pain for the gaining of worldly rest or pleasure and for the avoiding of another pain (though the pain he take be peradventure more, yet to be endured but for a short season), why should not reason, grounded upon the sure foundation of faith, and helped toward also with the aid of God's grace—as it ever is, undoubtedly, when folk for a good mind in God's name come together, our Saviour saying himself, "Where there are two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I also even in the very midst of them." Why should not then reason, I say, thus furthered with faith and grace, be much more able first to engender in us such an affection, and afterward, by long and deep meditation thereof, so to continue that affection that it shall turn into a habitual purpose, fast-rooted and deep, of patiently suffering the painful death of this body here in earth for the gaining of everlasting wealthy life in heaven and avoiding of everlasting painful death in hell?
Now then, if reason alone is enough to motivate someone to endure pain in exchange for worldly comfort or pleasure and to avoid another pain (even if the pain they endure might be greater, but only for a short time), why shouldn't reason, based on the solid foundation of faith, and further supported by God's grace—since it always is when people gather with good intentions in God's name, as our Savior Himself said, "Where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them"—why shouldn't reason, I ask, strengthened by faith and grace, be even more capable of first creating in us such a love and then, through long and deep reflection on that love, sustaining it to the point where it becomes a deep-rooted, habitual resolve to patiently endure the painful death of this body here on earth for the sake of gaining everlasting life in heaven and avoiding everlasting painful death in hell?
VINCENT: By my troth, uncle, I can find no words that should have any reason with them—faith being always presupposed, as you protested in the beginning, for a ground—words, I say, I can find none with which I might reasonably counter-plead this that you have said here already.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, I can’t find any words that make sense in this situation—faith being the basis, as you mentioned at the start—words, I mean, that I could use to reasonably argue against what you’ve already said here.
But yet I remember the fable that Æsop telleth of a great old hart that had fled from a little bitch, which had made pursuit after him and chased him so long that she had lost him, and (he hoped) more than half given him over. Having then some time to talk, and meeting with another of his fellows, he fell into deliberation with him as to what it were best for him to do—whether to run on still and fly farther from her, or to turn again and fight with her. The other hart advised him to fly no farther, lest the bitch might happen to find him again when he would be out of breath by the labour of farther fleeing, and thereby all out of strength too, and so would he be killed lying where he could not stir himself. Whereas, if he would turn and fight, he would be in no peril at all. "For the man with whom she hunteth," he said, "is more than a mile behind her. And she is but a little body, scant half so much as thou, and thy horns can thrust her through before she can touch thy flesh, by more than ten times her tooth-length." "By my troth," quoth the other hart, "I like your counsel well, and methinketh that the thing is even soothly as you say. But I fear me that when I hear once that cursed bitch bark, I shall fall to my feet and forget all together. But yet, if you will go back with me, then methinketh we shall be strong enough against that one bitch between us both." The other hart agreed, and they both appointed them thereon. But even as they were about to busk them forward to it, the bitch had found the scent again, and on she came yalping toward the place. And as soon as the harts heard her, off they went both twain apace!
But I remember the fable that Aesop tells about a big old stag that had run away from a little dog that was chasing him. After a while, the dog lost him, and he thought she had given up more than halfway. With some time to chat, he met another stag and they discussed what he should do—whether to keep running and get further away, or to turn around and fight the dog. The other stag advised him not to run any further, in case the dog found him again when he was exhausted from running, leaving him too weak to defend himself and making it easy for her to catch him. On the other hand, if he turned to fight, he wouldn’t be in any danger. "The man who’s hunting her," he said, "is more than a mile behind. And she's just a little thing, not even half your size, and your antlers can easily push her away before she gets near enough to bite you." "Honestly," the other stag replied, "I really like your advice, and I think you’re right. But I’m afraid that when I hear that cursed dog bark, I’ll just collapse and forget everything. But if you come back with me, then I think we’ll be strong enough to take on that one dog together." The other stag agreed, and they both prepared to go. But just as they were about to head back, the dog tracked their scent again and came yapping towards them. As soon as the stags heard her, they both took off running!
And in good faith, uncle, even so I fear it would fare by myself and many others too. Though we think it reason, what you say, and in our minds agree that we should do as you say—yea, and peradventure think also that we would indeed do as you say—yet as soon as we should once hear those hell-hounds the Turks come yalping and howling upon us, our hearts should soon fall as clean from us as those other harts fled from the hounds.
And honestly, uncle, I still worry about how it would go for me and many others. Even though we believe what you say makes sense, and we all agree in our minds that we should follow your advice—yeah, we might even think we actually would—once we hear those hellish Turks coming after us, our hearts would drop just like those other deer ran from the hounds.
ANTHONY: Cousin, in those days that Æsop speaketh of, though those harts and other brute beasts had (if he say sooth) the power to speak and talk, and in their talking power to talk reason too, yet they never had given them the power to follow reason and rule themselves thereby. And in good faith, cousin, as for such things as pertain to the conducting of reasonable men to salvation, I think that without the help of grace men's reasoning shall do little more. But then are we sure, as I said before, that if we desire grace, God is at such reasoning always present and very ready to give it. And unless men will afterward willingly cast it away, he is ever ready still to keep it and glad from time to time to increase it. And therefore our Lord biddeth us, by the mouth of the prophet, that we should not be like such brutish and unreasonable beasts as were those harts, and as are horses and mules: "Be not you like a horse and a mule, that hath no understanding." And therefore, cousin, let us never dread but what, if we will apply our minds to the gathering of comfort and courage against our persecutions, and hear reason and let it sink into our heart and cast it not out again (nor vomit it up, nor even there choke it up and stifle it with pampering in and stuffing up our stomachs with a surfeit of worldly vanities), God shall so well work with it that we shall feel strength therein. And so we shall not in such wise have all such shameful cowardous hearts as to forsake our Saviour and thereby lose our own salvation and run into eternal fire for fear of death joined therein—though bitter and sharp, yet short for all that, and (in a manner) a momentary pain.
ANTHONY: Cousin, back in the days that Æsop talked about, even though those deer and other animals could (if he speaks the truth) speak and reason, they never had the ability to truly follow reason and control themselves. Honestly, cousin, when it comes to leading rational people to salvation, I think that without grace, our reasoning won't get us very far. But we can be certain, as I mentioned earlier, that if we seek grace, God is always present and willing to provide it. And unless people choose to reject it later, He is always ready to maintain it and happily increase it over time. That's why our Lord tells us, through the prophet, not to be like those brutish and unreasonable animals, like those deer, horses, and mules: "Do not be like a horse or a mule, which have no understanding." So, cousin, let’s not doubt that if we focus our minds on finding comfort and courage against our challenges, and truly listen to reason, letting it sink into our hearts without dismissing it (or rejecting it, or smothering it by overindulging in worldly distractions), God will work through it in such a way that we will feel strong. This way, we won't have such shameful cowardice that leads us to abandon our Savior, which would result in losing our salvation and facing eternal damnation out of fear of death—though painful and sharp, it is still brief and, in a way, just a momentary suffering.
VINCENT: Every man, uncle, naturally grudgeth at pain, and is very loth to come to it.
VINCENT: Every man, uncle, naturally resents pain and is very reluctant to face it.
ANTHONY: That is very true, and no one biddeth any man to go run into it, unless he be taken and cannot flee. Then, we say that reason plainly telleth us that we should rather suffer and endure the less and the shorter pain here, than in hell the sorer and so far the longer too.
ANTHONY: That’s very true, and no one should urge anyone to jump into it unless they’re caught and can’t escape. So, we say that reason clearly tells us it’s better to endure a little bit of pain here rather than suffer the much worse and much longer pain in hell.
VINCENT: I heard of late, uncle, where such a reason was made as you make me now, which reason seemed undoubted and inevitable to me. Yet heard I lately, as I say, a man answer it thus: He said that if a man in this persecution should stand still in the confession of his faith and thereby fall into painful tormentry, he might peradventure happen, for the sharpness and bitterness of the pain, to forsake our Saviour even in the midst of it, and die there with his sin, and so be damned forever. Whereas, by the forsaking of the faith in the beginning, and for the time—and yet only in word, keeping it still nevertheless in his heart—a man might save himself from that painful death and afterward ask mercy and have it, and live long and do many good deeds, and be saved as St. Peter was.
VINCENT: I recently heard, uncle, about a situation similar to the one you're presenting to me now, which seemed completely valid and unavoidable to me. However, I heard a man respond to it this way: He said that if someone faced persecution and chose to stand firm in their faith, they might eventually succumb to intense suffering and, in that moment of agony, could potentially deny our Savior and die in their sin, leading to eternal damnation. On the other hand, by renouncing their faith temporarily—just in words while still holding it in their heart—they could avoid that painful death, later seek forgiveness, receive it, live a long life, do many good deeds, and ultimately be saved, just like St. Peter.
ANTHONY: That man's reason, cousin, is like a three-footed stool—so tottering on every side that whosoever sits on it may soon take a foul fall. For these are the three feet of this tottering stool: fantastical fear, false faith, and false flattering hope.
ANTHONY: That guy's reasoning, cousin, is like a three-legged stool—so unstable on every side that anyone who tries to sit on it could easily take a nasty spill. Because these are the three legs of this wobbly stool: unrealistic fear, misguided faith, and deceptive hope.
First, it is a fantastical fear that the man conceiveth, that it should be perilous to stand in the confession of the faith at the beginning, lest he might afterward, through the bitterness of the pain, fall to the forsaking and so die there in the pain, out of hand, and thereby be utterly damned. As though, if a man were overcome by pain and so forsook his faith, God could not or would not as well give him grace to repent again, and thereupon give him forgiveness, as he would give it to him who forsook his faith in the beginning and set so little by God that he would rather forsake him than suffer for his sake any manner of pain at all! As though the more pain that a man taketh for God's sake, the worse would God be to him! If this reason were not unreasonable, then should our Saviour not have said, as he did, "Fear not them that may kill the body, and after that have nothing that they can do further." For he should, by this reason, have said, "Dread and fear them that may slay the body, for they may, by the torment of painful death (unless thou forsake me betimes in the beginning and so save thy life, and get of me thy pardon and forgiveness afterward) make thee peradventure forsake me too late, and so be damned forever."
First, it's a crazy fear that the man comes up with, thinking it's dangerous to stand firm in his faith at the beginning, fearing that later, due to the agony of pain, he might abandon it and die right there in suffering, ultimately facing damnation. As if, if someone is overwhelmed by pain and turns away from their faith, God couldn't or wouldn't also grant them grace to repent later and forgive them, just as He would for someone who abandoned their faith from the start and valued God so little that they'd rather reject Him than endure any pain for His sake at all! As if the more suffering someone accepts for God’s sake, the worse God would be to them! If this reasoning were valid, then our Savior wouldn't have said, “Do not fear those who can kill the body, and after that have no more they can do.” Instead, based on this logic, He would have said, “Be afraid of those who can kill the body, because they might, through the torture of a painful death (unless you abandon me early on to save your life and later receive pardon and forgiveness from me), cause you to turn away too late and be condemned forever.”
The second foot of this tottering stool is a false faith. For it is but a feigned faith for a man to say to God secretly that he believeth him, trusteth him, and loveth him, and then openly, where he should to God's honour tell the same tale and thereby prove that he doth so, there to God's dishonour flatter God's enemies as much as in him is, and do them pleasure and worship, with the forsaking of God's faith before the world. And such a one either is faithless in his heart too, or else knoweth well that he doth God this despite even before his own face. For unless he lack faith, he cannot but know that our Lord is everywhere present, and that, while he so shamefully forsaketh him, he full angrily looketh on.
The second leg of this unstable stool is a fake faith. It's just pretend faith for someone to tell God in secret that they believe in Him, trust Him, and love Him, and then openly, when they should honor God by sharing the same message and proving that they do, they flatter God's enemies as much as they can and do them favors and worship, all while abandoning God's faith in front of everyone. A person like this is either faithless in their heart too or knows very well that they are disrespecting God right in front of Him. For unless they lack faith, they can’t ignore that our Lord is present everywhere and that, while they shamefully turn away from Him, He is looking on in anger.
The third foot of this tottering stool is false flattering hope. For since the thing that he doth, when he forsaketh his faith for fear, is forbidden by the mouth of God upon the pain of eternal death, though the goodness of God forgiveth many folk for the fault, yet to be bolder in offending for the hope of forgiving is a very false pestilent hope, with which a man flattereth himself toward his own destruction.
The third leg of this shaky stool is the illusion of hope. Since what he does when he abandons his faith out of fear is prohibited by God under the threat of eternal damnation, even though God's goodness forgives many people for their mistakes, being more daring in sinning because of the hope of forgiveness is a dangerous and misleading hope, one that leads a person to deceive themselves toward their own destruction.
He who, in a sudden turn for fear or other affection, unadvisedly falleth, and after, in labouring to rise again, comforteth himself with hope of God's gracious forgiveness, walketh in the ready way toward his salvation. But he who with the hope of God's mercy to follow, doth encourage himself to sin, and thereby offendeth God first—I have no power to keep the hand of God from giving out his pardon where he will (nor would I if I could, but rather help to pray for it), but yet I very sorely fear that such a man may miss the grace to ask it in such effectual wise as to have it granted. Nor can I now instantly remember any example or promise expressed in holy scripture that the offender in such a case shall have the grace offered afterward, in such wise to seek for pardon that God, by his other promises of remission promised to penitents, would be bound himself to grant it. But this kind of presumption, under pretext of hope, seemeth rather to draw near on the one side (as despair doth, on the other) toward the abominable sin of blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. And against that sin, concerning either the impossibility or at least the great difficulty of forgiveness, our Saviour himself hath spoken in the twelfth chapter of St. Matthew and in the third chapter of St. Mark, where he saith that blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven, neither in this world nor in the world to come.
Who, in a sudden moment of fear or other emotions, mistakenly falls, and then, in trying to rise again, reassures himself with the hope of God's kind forgiveness, is walking the right path toward his salvation. But he who, with the expectation of God's mercy ahead, encourages himself to sin and thus offends God first— I have no ability to prevent God from granting his pardon wherever He wants (nor would I if I could, but I would rather help pray for it)— yet I greatly worry that such a person might miss the grace to ask for it in a way effective enough to have it granted. I can't immediately recall any example or promise in the holy scripture that indicates the offender in this situation will have the grace offered afterward to seek pardon in such a way that God, bound by his other promises of forgiveness made to penitents, would be compelled to grant it. However, this type of presumption, under the guise of hope, seems to edge closer to one side (just as despair does on the other) to the horrible sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. And about that sin, regarding either the impossibility or at least the great difficulty of forgiveness, our Savior himself spoke in the twelfth chapter of St. Matthew and the third chapter of St. Mark, where he says that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven, neither in this world nor in the next.
And where the man that you speak of took in his reason an example of St. Peter, who forsook our Saviour and got forgiveness afterward, let him consider again on the other hand that he forsook him not upon the boldness of such a sinful trust, but was overcome and vanquished by a sudden fear. And yet, by that forsaking, St. Peter won but little, for he did but delay his trouble for a little while, as you know well. For beside that, he repented forthwith very sorely that he had so done, and wept for it forthwith full bitterly. He came forth at the Whitsuntide ensuing, and confessed his Master again, and soon after that, he was imprisoned for it. And not ceasing so, he was thereupon sore scourged for the confession of his faith, and yet after that imprisoned again afresh. And, being from thence delivered, he stinted not to preach on still until, after manifold labours, travails, and troubles, he was in Rome crucified and with cruel torment slain.
And where the man you mention thought of St. Peter as an example, who abandoned our Savior and was forgiven later, he should realize that Peter didn't leave out of a bold and sinful confidence, but was overwhelmed by sudden fear. Still, by abandoning Him, St. Peter gained very little, because he merely postponed his trouble for a short while, as you know well. Besides that, he immediately regretted what he had done and wept bitterly over it. He came forth at the following Whitsun and confessed his Master again, and soon after that, he was imprisoned for it. Not stopping there, he was severely beaten for confessing his faith and then imprisoned again. After being released, he didn’t stop preaching until, after numerous labors, hardships, and troubles, he was crucified in Rome and killed with brutal torment.
And in like wise I think I might (in a manner) well warrant that no man who denieth our Saviour once and afterward attaineth remission shall escape through that denial one penny the cheaper, but that he shall, ere he come to heaven, full surely pay for it.
And similarly, I think I can confidently say that no one who denies our Savior and later seeks forgiveness will get off easy for that denial; instead, they will surely have to pay for it before they reach heaven.
VINCENT: He shall peradventure, uncle, afterward work it out in the fruitful works of penance, prayer, and almsdeed, done in true faith and due charity, and in such wise attain forgiveness well enough.
VINCENT: Maybe, uncle, he will later make up for it through the fruitful actions of penance, prayer, and charity, done with true faith and genuine love, and in that way, he will be able to achieve forgiveness.
ANTHONY: All his forgiveness goeth, cousin, as you see well, but by "perhaps." But as it may be "perhaps yea," so may it be "perhaps nay," and where is he then? And yet, you know, he shall never, by any manner of hap, hap finally to escape from death, for fear of which he forsook his faith.
ANTHONY: All his forgiveness is dependent, cousin, as you can see, but on "perhaps." Just as it might be "perhaps yes," it could also be "perhaps no," and where does that leave him? And yet, you know, he will never, by any chance, truly escape death, which is the fear that made him abandon his faith.
VINCENT: No, but he may die his natural death, and escape that violent death. And then he saveth himself from much pain and so winneth much ease. For a violent death is ever painful.
VINCENT: No, but he might die a natural death and avoid that violent one. Then he saves himself from a lot of pain and gains a lot of ease. Because a violent death is always painful.
ANTHONY: Peradventure he shall not avoid a violent death thereby, for God is without doubt displeased, and can bring him shortly to as violent a death by some other way.
ANTHONY: Perhaps he won't be able to escape a violent death because of this, for God is certainly displeased and can bring him to a violent end through some other means.
Howbeit, I see well that you reckon that whosoever dieth a natural death, dieth like a wanton even at his ease. You make me remember a man who was once in a light galley with us on the sea. While the sea was sore wrought and the waves rose very high, he lay tossed hither and thither, for he had never been to sea before. The poor soul groaned sore and for pain thought he would very fain be dead, and ever he wished, "Would God I were on land, that I might die in rest!" The waves so troubled him there, with tossing him up and down, to and fro, that he thought that trouble prevented him from dying, because the waves would not let him rest! But if he might get once to land, he thought he should then die there even at his ease.
However, I can clearly see that you believe anyone who dies a natural death dies peacefully and without struggle. This reminds me of a man who was once on a small boat with us at sea. While the sea was rough and the waves were very high, he was tossed around, as he had never been on the ocean before. The poor guy groaned in agony and wished he could just be dead, constantly thinking, "I wish I were on land so I could die in peace!" The waves were so disruptive, throwing him up and down, side to side, that he thought this turmoil was preventing him from dying, since the waves wouldn’t let him relax! But if he could just reach land, he believed he would die there peacefully.
VINCENT: Nay, uncle, this is no doubt, but that death is to every man painful. But yet is not the natural death so painful as the violent.
VINCENT: No, uncle, there's no doubt about it, death is painful for everyone. But natural death is not as painful as violent death.
ANTHONY: By my troth, cousin, methinketh that the death which men commonly call "natural" is a violent death to every may whom it fetcheth hence by force against his will. And that is every man who, when he dieth, is loth to die and fain would yet live longer if he could.
ANTHONY: Honestly, cousin, I think that the death most people refer to as "natural" is actually a violent death for anyone it takes away against their will. And that’s everyone who, when they die, is reluctant to go and would gladly live longer if they had the chance.
Howbeit, cousin, fain would I know who hath told you how small is the pain in the natural death! As far as I can perceive, those folk that commonly depart of their natural death have ever one disease and sickness or another. And if the pain of the whole week or twain in which they lie pining in their bed, were gathered together in so short a time as a man hath his pain who dieth a violent death, it would, I daresay, make double the pain that is his. So he who dieth naturally often suffereth more pain rather than less, though he suffer it in a longer time. And then would many a man be more loth to suffer so long, lingering in pain, than with a sharper pang to be sooner rid. And yet lieth many a man more days than one, in well-near as great pain continually, as is the pain that with the violent death riddeth the man in less than half an hour—unless you think that, whereas the pain is great to have a knife cut the flesh on the outside from the skin inward, the pain would be much less if the knife might begin on the inside and cut from the midst outward! Some we hear, on their deathbed, complain that they think they feel sharp knives cut in two their heartstrings. Some cry out and think they feel, within the brainpan, their head pricked even full of pins. And those who lie in a pleurisy think that, every time they cough, they feel a sharp sword snap them to the heart.
However, cousin, I would really like to know who told you that dying a natural death involves so little pain! From what I can see, those people who usually die naturally always have some disease or illness. And if you were to add up the pain from the whole week or two that they spend suffering in bed, it would probably be greater than the pain someone feels who dies a violent death in just a short time. So, someone who dies naturally often endures more pain, even if it spreads out over a longer period. Many would prefer to avoid suffering for so long, lingering in agony, and would rather face a sharper pain and be done with it sooner. Yet, many people spend more than a few days experiencing almost as much continuous pain as someone who suffers a violent death that takes less than half an hour—unless you believe that the pain of having a knife cut into the flesh from the outside would somehow be less if the knife started from the inside and cut outwards! Some people we hear about on their deathbed complain that they feel sharp knives cutting through their heartstrings. Others cry out, believing they feel their heads being poked full of pins. And those suffering from pleurisy feel that with every cough, a sharp sword pierces their heart.
XXV
Howbeit, what need we to make any such comparison between the natural death and the violent, for the matter that we are in hand with here? Without doubt, he who forsaketh the faith of Christ for fear of the violent death, putteth himself in peril to find his natural death a thousand times more painful. For his natural death hath his everlasting pain so instantly knit to it, that there is not one moment of time between, but the end of the one is the beginning of the other, which never after shall have an end.
However, what’s the point of comparing natural death and violent death for what we're discussing here? Clearly, anyone who renounces their faith in Christ out of fear of a violent death risks experiencing their natural death a thousand times more painfully. That's because natural death is so closely tied to everlasting pain that there isn’t even a moment in between; the end of one is the start of the other, which will never end.
And therefore was it not without great cause that Christ gave us so good warning before, when he said, as St. Luke in the twenty-second chapter rehearseth, "I say to you that are my friends, be not afraid of them that kill the body, and when that is done are able to do no more. But I shall show you whom you should fear. Fear him who, when he hath killed, hath in his power further to cast him whom he killeth into everlasting fire. So I say to you, be afraid of him." God meaneth not here that we should not dread at all any man who can but kill the body, but he meaneth that we should not in such wise dread any such man that we should, for dread of them, displease him who can everlastingly kill both body and soul with a death ever-dying and that shall yet never die. And therefore he addeth and repeateth in the end again, the fear that we should have of him, and saith, "So I say to you, fear him."
And so it’s no surprise that Christ gave us such an important warning earlier, when he said, as St. Luke mentions in the twenty-second chapter, "I tell you, my friends, don’t be afraid of those who can kill the body, and after that can do no more. But I will tell you whom you should fear. Fear the one who, after killing, has the power to throw the one he kills into eternal fire. So I say to you, fear him." God doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be afraid of anyone who can only kill the body, but He means we shouldn’t be so afraid of them that we end up displeasing Him, who can eternally destroy both body and soul with a death that never really dies. That’s why He emphasizes at the end again the fear we should have of Him, saying, "So I say to you, fear Him."
O good God, cousin, if a man would well weigh those words and let them sink down deep into his heart as they should do, and often bethink himself on them, it would (I doubt not) be able enough to make us set at naught all the great Turk's threats, and esteem him not a straw. But we should be well content to endure all the pain that all the world could put upon us, for so short a while as all they were able to make us dwell in it, rather than, by shrinking from those pains (though never so sharp, yet but short), to cast ourselves into the pain of hell—a hundred thousand times more intolerable, and of which there shall never come an end. A woeful death is that death, in which folk shall evermore be dying and never can once be dead! For the scripture saith, "They shall call and cry for death, and death shall fly from them."
O good God, cousin, if a person truly reflected on those words and allowed them to sink deep into their heart as they should, and often thought about them, it would surely help us dismiss all the threats of the great Turk and see him as nothing. Instead, we should be willing to endure all the suffering that the world could inflict upon us, if it were just for a short time, rather than, by avoiding those pains (no matter how sharp, yet brief), throw ourselves into the pain of hell—a hundred thousand times more unbearable and with no end in sight. A tragic death is the one in which people will always be dying but can never truly die! For the scripture says, "They will call out and cry for death, but death will flee from them."
O, good Lord, if one of them were not put in choice of both, he would rather suffer the whole year together the most terrible death that all the Turks in Turkey could devise, than to endure for the space of half an hour the death that they lie in now. Into what wretched folly fall, then, those faithless or feeble-faithed folk, who, to avoid the pain that is so far the less and so short, fall instead into pain a thousand thousand times more horrible, and terrible torment of which they are sure they shall never have an end!
Oh, good Lord, if one of them had a choice, he would rather face the worst death that all the Turks in Turkey could imagine for an entire year than endure even half an hour of the death they are currently experiencing. How foolish are those who lack faith or have weak faith, who, to escape a pain that is much less and so brief, choose instead to fall into a suffering that is a million times more horrific and a torment they know will never end!
This matter, cousin, lacketh, I believe, only full faith or sufficient minding. For I think, on my faith, that if we have the grace verily to believe it and often to think well on it, the fear of all the Turk's persecution—with all this midday devil were able to do in the forcing of us to forsake our faith—should never be able to turn us.
This issue, cousin, seems to need just complete faith or enough attention. I truly believe that if we have the grace to really believe it and think positively about it often, the fear of all the Turk's persecution—along with everything this midday devil could do to make us abandon our faith—should never be able to sway us.
VINCENT: By my troth, uncle, I think it is as you say. For surely, if we would often think on these pains of hell—as we are very loth to do, and purposely seek us childish pastimes to put such heavy things out of our thought—this one point alone would be able enough, I think, to make many a martyr.
VINCENT: Honestly, uncle, I think you're right. Surely, if we often considered the pains of hell—as we really don’t want to, and purposely look for childish distractions to avoid such heavy thoughts—this one idea alone would be enough, I believe, to make many a martyr.
XXVI
ANTHONY: Forsooth, cousin, if we were such as we should be, I would scant, for very shame, speak of the pains of hell in exhortation to the keeping of Christ's faith. I would rather put us in mind of the joys of heaven, the pleasure of which we should be more glad to get than we should be to flee and escape all the pains of hell.
ANTHONY: Truly, cousin, if we were the kind of people we should be, I could hardly, out of shame, talk about the torments of hell to encourage keeping Christ's faith. I would rather remind us of the joys of heaven, the happiness of which we should be more eager to attain than to avoid and escape all the suffering of hell.
But surely God is marvellous merciful to us in the thing in which he may seem most rigorous. And that is (which many men would little think) in that he provided hell. For I suppose very surely, cousin, that many a man—and woman, too—of whom some now sit, and more shall hereafter sit, full gloriously crowned in heaven, had they not first been afraid of hell, would never have set foot toward heaven.
But surely God is wonderfully merciful to us in the way that might seem most severe. And that is (which many people wouldn’t think) in the fact that he created hell. Because I truly believe, cousin, that many men—and women, too—who are currently sitting here, and many more who will sit here in the future, crowned gloriously in heaven, would never have made their way toward heaven if they hadn’t first been afraid of hell.
But yet undoubtedly, if we could conceive in our hearts the marvellous joys of heaven as well as we conceive the fearful pains of hell—howbeit, we can conceive neither one sufficiently. But if we could in our imagination approach as much toward the perceiving of the one as we may toward the consideration of the other, we would not fail to be far more moved and stirred to suffering for Christ's sake in this world, for the winning of those heavenly joys than for the eschewing of all those infernal pains. But forasmuch as the fleshly pleasures are far less pleasant than the fleshly pains are painful, therefore we fleshly folk, who are so drowned in these fleshly pleasures and in the desire of them that we have almost no manner of savour or taste for any pleasure that is spiritual, we have no cause to marvel that our fleshly affections are more abated and refrained by the dread and terror of hell than spiritual affections are imprinted in us and pricked forward with the desire and joyful hope of heaven.
But undoubtedly, if we could truly grasp in our hearts the amazing joys of heaven as clearly as we understand the terrible pains of hell—even though we can't fully understand either one. If we could imagine the joys of heaven as vividly as we consider the torments of hell, we would definitely be much more moved to endure suffering for Christ in this world to gain those heavenly joys than we are to avoid those hellish pains. However, since the pleasures of the flesh are far less enjoyable than the pains of the flesh are painful, we, who are so caught up in these earthly pleasures and the desire for them, have almost no appetite or taste for any spiritual pleasure. Therefore, it's no surprise that our physical desires are more restrained by the fear and terror of hell than our spiritual desires are motivated by the longing and joyful hope of heaven.
Howbeit, if we would set somewhat less by the filthy voluptuous appetites of the flesh, and would, by withdrawing from them, with help of prayer through the grace of God, draw nearer to the secret inward pleasure of the spirit, we should, by the little sipping that our hearts should have here now, and that instantaneous taste of it, have an estimation of the incomparable and uncogitable joy that we shall have (if we will) in heaven, by the very full draught thereof. For thereof it is written, "I shall be satiate" or satisfied, or fulfilled, "when thy glory, good Lord, shall appear," that is, with the fruition of the sight of God's glorious majesty face to face. And the desire, expectation, and heavenly hope thereof, shall more encourage us and make us strong to suffer and sustain for the love of God and salvation of our soul, than ever we could be made to suffer worldly pain here by the terrible dread of all the horrible pains that damned wretches have in hell.
However, if we could value the shameful desires of the flesh a bit less and, by pulling away from them and praying with God's grace, draw closer to the deep inner joy of the spirit, we would, through the small experiences our hearts have now and the brief taste of it, gain an understanding of the incomparable and unimaginable joy we will have (if we choose) in heaven, through the complete experience of it. For it is written, "I shall be satiated" or satisfied, "when your glory, good Lord, shall appear," meaning with the enjoyment of seeing God's glorious majesty face to face. The desire, anticipation, and heavenly hope of this will encourage us and strengthen us to endure and persevere for the love of God and the salvation of our souls, more than any worldly pain could ever compel us to endure through the terrible fear of the horrific sufferings that the damned experience in hell.
Therefore in the meantime, for lack of such experimental taste as God giveth here sometimes to some of his special servants, to the intent that we may draw toward the spiritual exercise too—for which spiritual exercise God with that gift, as with an earnest-penny of their whole reward afterward in heaven, comforteth them here in earth—let us labour by prayer to conceive in our hearts such a fervent longing for them that we may, for attaining to them, utterly set at naught all fleshly delight, all worldly pleasures, all earthly losses, all bodily torment and pain. And let us do this, not so much with looking to have described what manner of joys they shall be, as with hearing what our Lord telleth us in holy scripture how marvellous great they shall be. Howbeit, some things are there in scripture expressed of the manner of the pleasures and joys that we shall have in heaven, as, "Righteous men shall shine as the sun and shall run about like sparkles of fire among reeds."
Therefore, in the meantime, since we lack the kind of experiential understanding that God sometimes grants to a few of His chosen servants—so that we may also strive for spiritual practice, which God rewards as a small taste of their ultimate reward in heaven—let's work through prayer to foster in our hearts a deep yearning for those experiences. This yearning should motivate us to completely disregard all physical pleasures, worldly delights, earthly losses, and any bodily suffering. And let's pursue this not so much by trying to imagine what those joys will be like, but by listening to what our Lord tells us in the scriptures about how incredibly great they will be. However, scripture does describe some aspects of the pleasures and joys we will enjoy in heaven, such as, "Righteous people shall shine like the sun and will dart around like sparks among the reeds."
Now, tell some carnal-minded man of this manner of pleasure, and he shall take little pleasure in it, and say he careth not to have his flesh shine, he, nor like a spark of fire to skip about in the sky. Tell him that his body shall be impassible and never feel harm, and he will think then that he shall never be ahungered or athirst, and shall thereby forbear all his pleasure of eating and drinking, and that he shall never wish for sleep, and shall thereby lose the pleasure that he was wont to take in lying slug-abed. Tell him that men and women shall there live together as angels without any manner of mind or motion unto the carnal act of generation, and he will think that he shall thereby not use there his old filthy voluptuous fashion. He will say then that he is better at ease already, and would not give this world for that. For, as St. Paul saith, "A carnal man feeleth not the things that be of the spirit of God, for it is foolishness to him."
Now, tell a pleasure-seeking person about this kind of joy, and they won't be interested. They'll say they don't care about having their physical appearance shine, nor do they want to skip around like a spark in the sky. Tell them that their body will be impervious to harm and they'll think they’ll never feel hunger or thirst, so they’ll give up all enjoyment from eating and drinking. They'll also believe that they won’t long for sleep and will miss the pleasure they used to get from lounging in bed. Tell them that men and women will live together like angels without any desire for physical intimacy, and they'll think that means they can't enjoy their old indulgent ways. They'll then say they’re already better off and wouldn’t trade this world for that. Because, as St. Paul says, "A person focused on the flesh doesn’t understand the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to them."
But the time shall come when these foul filthy pleasures shall be so taken from him that it shall abhor his heart once to think on them. Every man hath a certain shadow of this experience in the fervent grief of a sore painful sickness, when his stomach can scant abide to look upon any meat, and as for the acts of the other foul filthy lust, he is ready to vomit if he hap to think thereon. When a man shall after this life feel in his heart that horrible abomination, of which sickness hath here a shadow, at the remembrance of these voluptuous pleasures, for which he would here be loth to change with the joys of heaven: when he shall, I say, after this life, have his fleshly pleasures in abomination, and shall have there a glimmering (though far from a perfect sight) of those heavenly joys which here he set so little by—O, good God, how fain will he then be, with how good will and how gladly would he then give this whole world, if it were his, to have the feeling of some little part of those joys!
But the time will come when these disgusting, filthy pleasures will be taken from him to the point that just thinking about them will revolt him. Every person has a glimpse of this experience in the intense sorrow of a painful illness, when their stomach can barely stand to look at any food, and as for the acts of other vile lusts, just thinking about them makes them want to vomit. When a person, after this life, feels in their heart that horrible disgust, which this illness only hints at, at the memory of those luxurious pleasures for which they wouldn't have wanted to trade the joys of heaven—when they have, after this life, an aversion to their fleshly pleasures and catch a glimpse (though far from full understanding) of those heavenly joys they dismissed here—oh, good God, how desperately they will wish they could give up everything they have, if it were theirs, just to feel a tiny part of those joys!
And therefore let us all who cannot now conceive such delight in the consideration of them as we should, have often in our eyes by reading, often in our ears by hearing, often in our mouths by rehearsing, often in our hearts by meditation and thinking, those joyful words of the holy scripture by which we learn how wonderful huge and great are those spiritual heavenly joys. Our carnal hearts have so feeble and so faint a feeling of them, and our dull worldly wits are so little able to conceive so much as a shadow of the right imagination! A shadow, I say, for, as for the thing as it is, not only can no fleshly carnal fancy conceive that, but beside that no spiritual person peradventure neither, so long as he is still living here in this world. For since the very essential substance of all the celestial joy standeth in the blessed beholding of the glorious Godhead face to face, no man may presume or look to attain it in this life. For God hath said so himself: "There shall no man here living behold me." And therefore we may well know not only that we are, for the state of this life, kept from the fruition of the bliss of heaven, but also I think that the very best man living here upon earth—the best man, I mean, who is no more than man—cannot attain the right imagination of it; but those who are very virtuous are yet (in a manner) as far from it as a man born blind is from the right imagination of colours.
And so, let all of us who can't really appreciate the joy in thinking about these things, often see them through reading, hear them through listening, speak them aloud by rehearsing, and reflect on them in our hearts through meditation and contemplation, those uplifting words from scripture that teach us how incredibly vast and amazing these spiritual heavenly joys are. Our fleshly hearts feel such a weak and faint sense of them, and our dull, worldly minds are barely able to grasp even a hint of the true understanding! I say a hint because, as things truly are, not only can no earthly imagination grasp that, but perhaps no spiritual person can either, as long as they are still living in this world. For the very essence of all celestial joy lies in the blessed experience of beholding the glorious God face to face, and no one may expect or assume to achieve that in this life. For God Himself has said, "No man living here shall see me." Therefore, we can clearly understand that not only are we, in the state of this life, prevented from experiencing the happiness of heaven, but I also believe that even the best person living on earth—the very best person, who is just a man—cannot truly picture it; however virtuous they might be, they are still, in a way, as far from this understanding as a person born blind is from truly grasping colors.
The words that St. Paul rehearseth of the prophet Isaiah, prophesying of Christ's incarnation, may properly be verified of the joys of heaven: "Oculus non vidit, nec auris audivit, nec in cor hominis adscendit, quae preparavit Deus diligentibus se." For surely, for this state of this world, the joys of heaven are by man's mouth unspeakable, to man's ears not audible, to men's hearts uncogitable, so far excel they all that ever men have heard of, all that ever men can speak of, and all that men can by natural possibility think on.
The words that St. Paul quotes from the prophet Isaiah, predicting Christ's incarnation, can definitely be applied to the joys of heaven: "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no human heart has imagined what God has prepared for those who love him." Truly, in this world, the joys of heaven are beyond what we can express, what our ears can hear, and what our hearts can comprehend, as they far surpass everything people have ever heard of, everything they can talk about, and everything they can possibly think of.
And yet, whereas such be the joys of heaven that are prepared for every saved soul, our Lord saith yet, by the mouth of St. John, that he will give his holy martyrs who suffer for his sake many a special kind of joy. For he saith, "To him that overcometh, I shall give him to eat of the tree of life. And I shall confess his name before my Father and before his angels." And also he saith, "Fear none of those things that thou shalt suffer . . . , but be faithful unto the death, and I shall give thee the crown of life. He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death." And he saith also, "To him that overcometh will I give manna secret and hid. And I will give him a white suffrage, and in his suffrage a new name written, which no man knoweth but he that receiveth it." They used of old in Greece, where St. John did write, to elect and choose men unto honourable offices, and every man's assent was called his "suffrage," which in some places was by voices and in some places by hands. And one kind of those suffrages was by certain things that in Latin are called calculi because, in some places, they used round stones for them. Now our Lord saith that unto him who overcometh he will give a white suffrage, for those that were white signified approving, as the black signified reproving. And in those suffrages did they use to write the name of him to whom they gave their vote. Now our Lord saith that to him who overcometh he will in the suffrage give him a new name, which no man knoweth but him who receiveth it. He saith also, "He that overcometh, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out thereof, and I shall write upon him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem which descendeth from heaven from my God, and I shall write on him also my new name." If we wished to enlarge upon this, and were able to declare these special gifts, with yet others that are specified in the second and third chapters of the Apocalypse, then would it appear how far those heavenly joys shall surmount above all the comfort that ever came in the mind of any man living here upon earth.
And yet, while there are joys in heaven prepared for every saved soul, our Lord says through St. John that he will give his holy martyrs who suffer for him a special kind of joy. He says, "To the one who overcomes, I will let him eat from the tree of life. And I will acknowledge his name before my Father and his angels." He also says, "Do not fear any of the things you are about to suffer... but be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life. The one who overcomes will not be harmed by the second death." Additionally, he says, "To the one who overcomes, I will give hidden manna. I will give him a white ballot, and in that ballot, a new name written that no one knows except the one who receives it." In ancient Greece, where St. John wrote, they would elect and choose individuals for honorable offices, and each person's support was called their "ballot," which was cast either by voice or hand. One type of ballot involved specific items that were called calculi in Latin, because in some places, they used round stones for voting. Now our Lord says that to the one who overcomes, he will give a white ballot, as white signified approval, while black signified disapproval. In these ballots, they used to write the name of the person they were voting for. Now our Lord promises that to the one who overcomes, he will provide a new name in that ballot, known only to the one who receives it. He also says, "To the one who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God, and he will no longer leave it, and I will write on him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down from heaven from my God, and I will also write on him my new name." If we wanted to elaborate on this and could explain these special gifts, along with others mentioned in the second and third chapters of the Apocalypse, it would show how much these heavenly joys exceed all comfort that any person on earth has ever experienced.
The blessed apostle St. Paul, who suffered so many perils and so many passions, saith of himself that he hath been "in many labours, in prisons oftener than others, in stripes above measure, at point of death often times; of the Jews had I five times forty stripes save one, thrice have I been beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice have I been in shipwreck, a day and a night was I in the depth of the sea; in my journeys oft have I been in peril of floods, in peril of thieves, in peril by the Jews, in perils by the pagans, in perils in the city, in perils in the desert, in perils in the sea, perils by false brethren, in labour and misery, in many nights' watch, in hunger and thirst, in many fastings, in cold and nakedness; beside those things that are outward, my daily instant labour, I mean my care and solicitude about all the churches," and yet saith he more of his tribulations, which for the length I let pass. This blessed apostle, I say, for all these tribulations that he himself suffered in the continuance of so many years, calleth all the tribulations of this world but light and as short as a moment, in respect of the weighty glory that it winneth us after this world: "This same short and momentary tribulation of ours that is in this present time, worketh within us the weight of glory above measure on high, we beholding not these things that we see, but those things that we see not. For those things that we see are but temporal things, but those things that are not seen are eternal."
The blessed apostle St. Paul, who faced countless dangers and hardships, says about himself that he has been "in many labors, in prisons more than others, severely beaten, close to death many times; from the Jews, I received forty lashes minus one five times, I was beaten with rods three times, I was stoned once, I’ve been shipwrecked three times, and I spent a day and a night in the open sea; in my travels, I've faced dangers from rivers, from robbers, from my own people, from nonbelievers, in the city, in the wilderness, at sea, and from false brothers, in hard work and distress, in sleepless nights, in hunger and thirst, in many fasts, in cold and nakedness; besides all these outward things, my daily effort, which is my concern and care for all the churches," and he says even more about his sufferings, which I’ll skip for brevity. This blessed apostle, despite all the trials he endured over so many years, considers all the tribulations of this world to be light and momentary compared to the eternal glory they prepare us for after this life: "This momentary affliction we’re experiencing right
Now to this great glory no man can come headless. Our head is Christ, and therefore to him must we be joined, and as members of his must we follow him, if we wish to come thither. He is our guide to guide us thither, and he is entered in before us. And he therefore who will enter in after, "the same way that Christ walked, the same way must he walk." And what was the way by which he walked into heaven? He himself showed what way it was that his Father had provided for him, when he said to the two disciples going toward the village of Emaus, "Knew you not that Christ must suffer passion, and by that way enter into his kingdom?" Who can for very shame desire to enter into the kingdom of Christ with ease, when he himself entered not into his own without pain?
Now, no one can reach this great glory without a head. Our head is Christ, so we must be united with him and follow him as his members if we want to get there. He is our guide to lead us there, and he has gone in ahead of us. Therefore, anyone who wants to enter after him must walk the same way that Christ walked. And what was the way in which he walked into heaven? He showed us the path his Father had prepared for him when he said to the two disciples heading to the village of Emmaus, "Did you not know that Christ must suffer and by that way enter into his kingdom?" Who can, out of shame, want to enter into the kingdom of Christ easily when he himself did not enter into his own without suffering?
XXVII
Surely, cousin, as I said before, in bearing the loss of worldly goods, in suffering captivity, thraldom, and imprisonment, and in the glad sustaining of worldly shame, if we would in all those points deeply ponder the example of our Saviour himself, it would be sufficient of itself alone to encourage every true Christian man and woman to refuse none of all those calamities for his sake.
Surely, cousin, as I mentioned before, in dealing with the loss of material possessions, in enduring captivity, slavery, and imprisonment, and in happily facing worldly shame, if we reflect deeply on the example of our Savior himself in all these aspects, it would be more than enough to inspire every true Christian man and woman to accept any of these hardships for his sake.
So say I now for painful death also: If we could and would with due compassion conceive in our minds a right imagination and remembrance of Christ's bitter painful passion—of the many sore bloody strokes that the cruel tormentors gave him with rods and whips upon every part of his holy tender body; of the scornful crown of sharp thorns beaten down upon his holy head, so strait and so deep that on every part his blessed blood issued out and streamed down; of his lovely limbs drawn and stretched out upon the cross, to the intolerable pain of his sore-beaten veins and sinews, feeling anew, with the cruel stretching and straining, pain far surpassing any cramp in every part of his blessed body at once; of the great long nails then cruelly driven with the hammer through his holy hands and feet; of his body, in this horrible pain, lifted up and let hang, with all its weight bearing down upon the painful wounded places so grievously pierced with nails; and in such torment, without pity, but not without many despites, suffered to be pined and pained the space of more than three long hours, till he himself willingly gave up unto his Father his holy soul; after which yet, to show the mightiness of their malice, after his holy soul departed, they pierced his holy heart with a sharp spear, at which issued out the holy blood and water, whence his holy sacraments have inestimable secret strength—if we could, I say, remember these things, in such a way as would God that we would, I verily suppose that the consideration of his incomparable kindness could not fail so to inflame our key-cold hearts, and set them on fire with his love, that we should find ourselves not only content but also glad and desirous to suffer death for his sake who so marvellously lovingly forbore not to sustain so far passing painful death for ours.
So now I say about painful death: If we could and would, with proper compassion, truly imagine and remember Christ's bitter suffering—of the many painful, bloody blows that the cruel torturers gave him with rods and whips on every part of his holy, tender body; of the mocking crown of sharp thorns pressed down onto his holy head, so tightly and deeply that his blessed blood flowed out and streamed down from every part; of his beautiful limbs stretched out on the cross, in unbearable pain from his sore, beaten veins and sinews, feeling once again, with the cruel pulling and straining, pain far beyond any cramp in every part of his blessed body at once; of the long nails that were brutally driven with a hammer through his holy hands and feet; of his body, in this horrific pain, lifted up and left to hang, with all its weight bearing down on the painfully wounded areas pierced by nails; and in such torment, without pity, but filled with insults, he was allowed to suffer and endure for more than three long hours, until he willingly gave up his holy soul to his Father; after which, to demonstrate the extent of their cruelty, they pierced his holy heart with a sharp spear, from which flowed holy blood and water, from which his holy sacraments derive their immeasurable secret strength—if we could, I say, remember these things in a way that pleases God, I truly believe that reflecting on his unmatched kindness would surely ignite our cold hearts and set them ablaze with his love, so that we would not only be willing but also eager and happy to endure death for his sake, who so marvelously and lovingly did not hesitate to endure such an extraordinarily painful death for ours.
Would God that we would here—to the shame of our cold affection toward God, in return for such fervent love and inestimable kindness of God toward us—would God we would, I say, but consider what hot affection many of these fleshly lovers have borne and daily bear to those upon whom they dote. How many of them have not stinted to jeopard their lives, and how many have willingly lost their lives indeed, without any great kindness showed them before—and afterward, you know, they could nothing win! But it contented and satisfied their minds that by their death their lover should clearly see how faithfully they loved. The delight thereof, imprinted in their fancy, not only assuaged their pain but also, they thought, outweighed it all. Of these affections, with the wonderful dolorous effects following upon them, not only old written stories, but beside that experience, I think, in every country, Christian and heathen both, giveth us proof enough. And is it not then a wonderful shame for us, for the dread of temporal death, to forsake our Saviour who willingly suffered so painful death rather than forsake us? Considering that, beside that, he shall for our suffering so highly reward us with everlasting wealth. Oh, if he who is content to die for his love, of whom he looketh afterward for no reward, and yet by his death goeth from her, might by his death be sure to come to her and ever after in delight and pleasure to dwell with her—such a love would not stint here to die for her twice! And what cold lovers are we then unto God, if, rather than die for him once, we will refuse him and forsake him forever—him who both died for us before, and hath also provided that, if we die here for him, we shall in heaven everlastingly both live and also reign with him! For as St. Paul saith, "If we suffer with him, we shall reign with him."
Would God that we would here—to the shame of our indifference toward God, in response to such passionate love and immeasurable kindness from God toward us—would God we would, I say, just reflect on the intense feelings many of these earthly lovers have had and still have for those they adore. How many of them have not hesitated to risk their lives, and how many have even willingly lost their lives, without any significant kindness shown to them beforehand—and afterward, you know, they couldn't gain anything! But it satisfied their minds that through their death, their lover would clearly see how faithfully they loved. The joy of that, etched in their thoughts, not only eased their pain but also, they believed, outweighed it all. Such strong feelings, with the incredibly painful consequences that follow them, are documented not only in ancient stories but also, I think, in experiences across every country, both Christian and non-Christian, providing us with enough evidence. And isn't it a terrible shame for us, fearing temporary death, to abandon our Savior who willingly suffered such a painful death rather than abandon us? Remember that, besides that, he will reward us greatly with everlasting riches for our suffering. Oh, if a man is willing to die for his love, from whom he expects no reward afterward, and yet by his death departs from her, if his death could ensure he’d be with her afterward in joy and pleasure—such a love would not hesitate to die for her twice! And what cold lovers are we toward God, if, rather than die for him even once, we refuse and abandon him forever—him who died for us first and has also promised that if we die here for him, we will eternally live and reign with him in heaven! For as St. Paul says, "If we suffer with him, we shall reign with him."
How many Romans, how many noble hearts of other sundry countries, have willingly given their own lives and suffered great deadly pains and very painful deaths for their countries, to win by their death only the reward of worldly renown and fame! And should we, then, shrink to suffer as much for eternal honour in heaven and everlasting glory? The devil hath also some heretics so obstinate that they wittingly endure painful death for vain glory. And is it not then more than shame that Christ shall see his Catholics forsake his faith rather than suffer the same for heaven and true glory?
How many Romans, how many noble people from various countries have willingly given their lives and endured great pain and suffering for their nations, all to achieve the reward of worldly recognition and fame through their deaths! Should we, then, hesitate to suffer just as much for eternal honor in heaven and everlasting glory? The devil also has some heretics who are so stubborn that they knowingly endure painful deaths for empty glory. Isn’t it more than just shame that Christ sees his Catholics abandon their faith rather than suffer the same for heaven and true glory?
Would God, as I many times have said, that the remembrance of Christ's kindness in suffering his passion for us, the consideration of hell that we shall fall in by forsaking him, and the joyful meditation of eternal life in heaven that we shall win with this short temporal death patiently taken for him, had so deep a place in our breast as reason would that they should—and as, if we would strive toward it and labour for it and pray for it, I verily think they would. For then should they so take up our mind and ravish it all another way, that, as a man hurt in a fray feeleth not sometimes his wound nor yet is aware of it, until his mind fall more thereon (so much so that sometimes another man telleth him that he hath lost a hand before he perceive it himself), so the mind ravished in the thinking deeply of those other things—Christ's death, hell, and heaven—would be likely to diminish and put away four parts of the feeling of our painful death—either of the death or the pain. For of this am I very sure: If we had the fifteenth part of the love for Christ that he both had and hath for us, all the pain of this Turk's persecution could not keep us from him, but there would be at this day as many martyrs here in Hungary as there have been before in other countries of old.
I wish that, as I've said many times, the memory of Christ's kindness in enduring his suffering for us, the consideration of the hell we could face for turning away from him, and the joyful reflection on the eternal life in heaven that awaits us if we patiently accept this brief temporal death for him, had a deeper place in our hearts, as reason suggests they should—and if we would strive for it, work toward it, and pray for it, I truly believe they would. Because then they would occupy our minds and captivate us in such a way that, like someone wounded in a fight who doesn't feel their injury until they focus on it (so much so that sometimes another person has to tell them they've lost a hand before they even notice), our minds, engrossed in contemplating those other things—Christ's death, hell, and heaven—would likely lessen and push away much of the pain we feel from our own death—whether it's the death itself or the suffering. For I am very certain of this: If we had just a fraction of the love for Christ that he both had and still has for us, all the pain from this Turk's persecution couldn't keep us away from him, and there would be as many martyrs here in Hungary today as there have been in other countries in the past.
And I doubt not but that, if the Turk stood even here with all his whole army about him; and if every one of them all were ready at hand with all the terrible torments that they could imagine, and were setting their torments to us unless we would forsake the faith; and if to the increase of our terror they fell all at once in a shout, with trumpets, tabrets, and timbrels all blown up at once, and all their guns let go therewith to make us a fearful noise; if then, on the other hand, the ground should suddenly quake and rive atwain, and the devils should rise out of hell and show themselves in such ugly shape as damned wretches shall see them; and if, with that hideous howling that those hell-hounds should screech, they should lay hell open on every side round about our feet, so that as we stood we should look down into that pestilent pit and see the swarm of poor souls in the terrible torments there—we would wax so afraid of the sight that we should scantly remember that we saw the Turk's host.
And I have no doubt that if the Turk stood right here with his entire army around him, and if every single one of them was ready with all the horrific tortures they could imagine, threatening us unless we abandoned our faith; and if, to add to our fear, they all shouted at once with trumpets, tambourines, and drums creating a deafening sound, while firing all their guns to create a terrifying noise; and if suddenly the ground quaked and split apart, and devils rose from hell showing themselves in the terrible forms that damned souls would recognize; and if those hellish creatures howled so loudly that they laid hell open all around us, making us look down into that cursed pit and see the multitude of suffering souls enduring terrible torment; we would be so overcome with fear at the sight that we would barely remember seeing the Turk's army.
And in good faith, for all that, yet think I further this: If there might then appear the great glory of God, the Trinity in his high marvellous majesty, our Saviour in his glorious manhood sitting on the throne, with his immaculate mother and all that glorious company, calling us there unto them; and if our way should yet lie through marvellous painful death before we could come at them—upon the sight, I say, of that glory, I daresay there would be no man who once would shrink at death, but every man would run on toward them in all that ever he could, though there lay by the way, to kill us for malice, both all the Turk's tormentors and all the devils.
And honestly, I believe this: If we could see the incredible glory of God, the Trinity in His magnificent majesty, our Savior in His glorious humanity sitting on the throne, alongside His pure mother and all that amazing company, inviting us to join them; and if we had to go through painful death before we could reach them—looking at that glory, I bet there wouldn't be a single person who would hesitate at death. Instead, everyone would rush toward them with everything they had, no matter what might try to stop us along the way, whether it be the tormentors from the Turks or all the devils.
And therefore, cousin, let us well consider these things, and let us have sure hope in the help of God. And then I doubt not but what we shall be sure that, as the prophet saith, the truth of his promise shall so compass us with a shield that we shall never need to fear. For either, if we trust in God well, and prepare us for it, the Turk shall never meddle with us; or else, if he do, he shall do us no harm but, instead of harm, inestimable good. Wherefore should we so sore now despair of God's gracious help, unless we were such madmen as to think that either his power or his mercy were worn out already? For we see that so many a thousand holy martyrs, by his holy help, suffered as much before as any man shall be put to now. Or what excuse can we have by the tenderness of our flesh? For we can be no more tender than were many of them, among whom were not only men of strength, but also weak women and children. And since the strength of them all stood in the help of God; and since the very strongest of them all was never able to himself to stand against all the world, and with God's help the feeblest of them all was strong enough so to stand; let us prepare ourselves with prayer, with our whole trust in his help, without any trust in our own strength. Let us think on it and prepare ourselves for it in our minds long before. Let us therein conform our will unto his, not desiring to be brought unto the peril of persecution (for it beseemeth a proud high mind to desire martyrdom) but desiring help and strength of God, if he suffer us to come to the stress—either being sought, found, and brought out against our wills, or else being by his commandment, for the comfort of our cure, bound to abide.
And so, cousin, let’s really think about these things and have firm hope in God’s help. I have no doubt that, as the prophet says, the truth of His promise will protect us like a shield so that we never need to fear. If we truly trust in God and prepare ourselves for it, the Turk will never touch us; but if he does, he will bring us unimaginable good instead of harm. Why should we despair of God’s gracious help unless we’re foolish enough to believe that His power or mercy has run out? We see that countless holy martyrs, with His holy help, endured just as much before as anyone does now. Or what excuse can we give based on our human vulnerability? We cannot be more delicate than many of them were, including not just strong men, but also weak women and children. And since their strength came from God’s help—and the strongest among them couldn’t stand against the world alone, while even the weakest were empowered by God’s support—let’s prepare ourselves with prayer, placing all our trust in His help, without relying on our own strength. Let’s think about this and get ready in our minds well in advance. Let’s align our will with His, not wishing for the hardship of persecution (because only a proud spirit desires martyrdom) but instead seeking God’s help and strength if He allows us to face trials—whether we are sought out, found, and dragged against our will, or simply commanded by Him to endure for our own comfort.
Let us fall to fasting, to prayer, and to almsdeed in time, and give unto God that which may be taken from us. If the devil put in our mind the saving of our land and our goods, let us remember that we cannot save them long. If he frighten us with exile and flying from our country, let us remember that we be born into the broad world, not to stick still in one place like a tree, and that whithersoever we go, God shall go with us. If he threaten us with captivity, let us answer him that it is better to be thrall unto a man for a while, for the pleasure of God, than, by displeasing God, to be perpetual thrall unto the devil. If he threaten us with imprisonment, let us tell him that we would rather be man's prisoner a while here in earth than, by forsaking the faith, be his prisoners for ever in hell. If he put in our minds the terror of the Turks, let us consider his false sleight, for this tale he telleth us to make us forget him. But let us remember well that, in respect of himself, the Turks are but a shadow. And all that they can do can be but a flea-bite in comparison with the mischief that he goeth about. The Turks are but his tormentors, for he himself doth the deed. Our Lord saith in the Apocalypse, "The devil shall send some of you to prison, to tempt you." He saith not that men shall, but that the devil shall, himself. For without question the devil's own deed it is, to bring us by his temptation, with fear and force, into eternal damnation. And therefore saith St. Paul, "Our wrestling is not against flesh and blood," etc.
Let’s dedicate ourselves to fasting, prayer, and charity in time, and give to God what can be taken from us. If the devil tries to convince us to hold onto our land and possessions, let’s remember that we can’t keep them forever. If he scares us with thoughts of exile and fleeing our homeland, let’s realize we were born into a vast world, not meant to remain rooted like a tree, and that wherever we go, God will be with us. If he threatens us with captivity, let’s remind him that it’s better to be enslaved by a person for a time, for God’s pleasure, than to be perpetually enslaved by the devil through disobedience. If he threatens us with imprisonment, let’s say that we would rather be someone's prisoner here on earth for a while than, by abandoning our faith, be his prisoners forever in hell. If he puts the fear of the Turks in our minds, let’s see through his deceit, because he tells us this story to make us forget him. But let’s remember that, in comparison to him, the Turks are just a shadow. All they can do is a minor annoyance compared to the harm he causes. The Turks are merely his tools, for he is the one who carries out the action. Our Lord says in the Apocalypse, "The devil shall send some of you to prison, to tempt you." He doesn’t say that men will, but that the devil will do it himself. For without a doubt, it is the devil's doing to lead us, through his temptations of fear and force, into eternal damnation. And that’s why St. Paul says, "Our struggle is not against flesh and blood," etc.
Thus may we see that in such persecutions it is the midday devil himself that maketh such incursion upon us, by the men who are his ministers, to make us fall for fear. For until we fall he can never hurt us. And therefore saith St. James, "Stand against the devil and he shall flee from you." For he never runneth upon a man to seize him with his claws until he see him down on the ground, willingly fallen himself. For his fashion is to set his servants against us, and by them to make us fall for fear or for impatience. And he himself in the meanwhile compasseth us, running and roaring like a ramping lion about us, looking to see who will fall, that he may then devour him. "Your adversary the devil," saith St. Peter, "like a roaring lion, runneth about in circuit, seeking whom he may devour."
Thus, we can see that during such persecutions, it’s the midday devil himself who attacks us through his followers, trying to make us fall out of fear. Because as long as we don’t fall, he can’t harm us. That’s why St. James says, "Resist the devil, and he will flee from you." He never pounces on someone to grab them with his claws until he sees them down on the ground, having chosen to fall willingly. His method is to send his servants against us, using them to make us stumble out of fear or impatience. Meanwhile, he circles around us, running and roaring like a raging lion, looking for anyone who will fall so he can then devour them. "Your adversary the devil," says St. Peter, "like a roaring lion, prowls around, seeking whom he may devour."
The devil it is, therefore, who, if we will fall for fear of men, is ready to run upon us and devour us. And is it wisdom, then, to think so much upon the Turks that we forget the devil? What a madman would he be who, when a lion were about to devour him, would vouchsafe to regard the biting of a little fisting cur? Therefore, when he roareth out upon us by the threats of mortal men, let us tell him that with our inward eye we see him well enough, and intend to stand and fight with him, even hand to hand. If he threaten us that we be too weak, let us tell him that our captain Christ is with us, and that we shall fight with the strength of him who hath vanquished him already. And let us fence with faith, and comfort us with hope, and smite the devil in the face with the firebrand of charity. For surely, if we be of the tender loving mind that our Master was, and do not hate them that kill us but pity them and pray for them, with sorrow for the peril that they work unto themselves, then that fire of charity thrown in his face will strike the devil suddenly so blind that he cannot see where to fasten a stroke on us.
The devil is the one who, if we give in to the fear of men, is ready to attack us and consume us. Is it wise, then, to focus so much on the Turks that we forget about the devil? What a fool he would be who, when a lion is about to eat him, would pay attention to the bite of a small barking dog? So when he roars at us through the threats of mortal men, let us tell him that with our inner sight we see him clearly and plan to stand and fight with him, face to face. If he threatens us, saying we are too weak, let us remind him that our leader Christ is with us, and we will fight with the strength of the one who has already defeated him. And let us protect ourselves with faith, comfort ourselves with hope, and strike the devil in the face with the fire of charity. For surely, if we possess the loving spirit that our Master had and do not hate those who kill us but feel pity for them and pray for them, with sorrow for the danger they create for themselves, then that fire of charity thrown in his face will suddenly blind the devil so he can't see where to strike us.
When we feel ourselves too bold, let us remember our own feebleness, and when we feel ourselves too faint, let us remember Christ's strength. In our fear, let us remember Christ's painful agony, that he himself would for our comfort suffer before his passion, to the intent that no fear should make us despair. And let us ever call for his help, such as he himself may please to send us. And then need we never doubt but that he shall either keep us from the painful death, or else strengthen us in it so that he shall joyously bring us to heaven by it. And then doth he much more for us than if he kept us from it. For God did more for poor Lazarus, in helping him patiently to die for hunger at the rich man's door, than if he had brought to him at the door all the rich glutton's dinner. So, though he be gracious to a man whom he delivereth out of painful trouble, yet doth he much more for a man if, through right painful death, he deliver him from this wretched world into eternal bliss. Whosoever shrinketh away from it by forsaking his faith, and falleth in the peril of everlasting fire, he shall be very sure to repent ere it be long after.
When we feel overly confident, let’s remember our own weaknesses, and when we feel too weak, let’s remember Christ’s strength. In our fear, let’s recall Christ’s painful agony, that he himself would suffer for our comfort before his passion, so that no fear should make us despair. And let’s always ask for his help, however he sees fit to send it. Then we can be sure that he will either save us from a painful death or strengthen us through it, so that he will joyfully lead us to heaven. In fact, he does much more for us this way than if he simply kept us from it. God did more for poor Lazarus, by helping him endure a painful death from hunger at the rich man’s door, than if he had just delivered all the rich glutton's dinner to him. So, while it is gracious of him to rescue someone from suffering, he does even more for a person if he brings them from this miserable world into eternal bliss through a truly painful death. Whoever backs away from this by abandoning their faith and risks eternal damnation can be sure they will regret it soon enough.
For I am sure that whensoever he falleth sick next, he will wish that he had been killed for Christ's sake before. What folly is it, then, to flee for fear from that death which thou seest thou shalt shortly afterward wish thou hadst died! Yea, I daresay almost every good Christian man would very fain this day that yesterday he had been cruelly killed for Christ's sake—even for the desire of heaven, though there were no hell. But to fear while the pain is coming, there is all our hindrance! But if, on the other hand, we would remember hell's pain into which we fall while we flee from this, then this short pain should be no hindrance at all. And yet, if we were faithful, we should be more pricked forward by deep consideration of the joys of heaven, of which the apostle saith, "The passions of this time be not worthy to the glory that is to come, which shall be showed in us." We should not, I believe, need much more in all this matter than one text of St. Paul, if we would consider it well. For surely, mine own good cousin, remember that if it were possible for me and you alone to suffer as much trouble as the whole world doth together, all that would not be worthy of itself to bring us to the joy which we hope to have everlastingly. And therefore, I pray you, let the consideration of that you put out all worldly trouble out of your heart, and also pray that it may do the same in me.
For I am sure that whenever he gets sick next, he will wish he had died for Christ’s sake before. How foolish is it, then, to run away out of fear from a death that you know you will soon wish you had faced! I dare say almost every good Christian would wish today that they had been brutally killed for Christ’s sake just for the chance at heaven, even if there were no hell. But fearing the pain as it approaches is what holds us back! On the other hand, if we remembered the pain of hell we might fall into while trying to escape this life, then this brief suffering should be no obstacle at all. And yet, if we were truly faithful, we should be more inspired by deep contemplation of the joys of heaven, of which the apostle says, “The sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed in us.” I believe we wouldn’t need much more than one verse from St. Paul if we reflected on it properly. For surely, my dear cousin, remember that if it were possible for you and me alone to endure as much trouble as the whole world does together, it would still not be worth it when compared to the joy we hope to have forever. So, I ask you to let the thought of this push all worldly troubles out of your heart, and also pray that it can do the same for me.
And even thus will I, good cousin, with these words, make a sudden end of mine whole tale, and bid you farewell. For now begin I to feel myself somewhat weary.
And so, good cousin, with these words, I'll suddenly wrap up my entire story and say goodbye. I'm starting to feel a bit tired now.
VINCENT: Forsooth, good uncle, this is a good end. And it is no marvel if you are waxed weary. For I have this day put you to so much labour that, save for the comfort that you yourself may take from having bestowed your time so well, and for the comfort that I have taken—and more shall, I trust—of your good counsel given, else would I be very sorry to have put you to so much pain.
VINCENT: Truly, dear uncle, this is a good conclusion. It’s no wonder you’re feeling tired. I’ve put you through so much work today that, unless you find some satisfaction in knowing you’ve spent your time well, and in the help I’ve received—and I hope to receive more from your wise advice—I'd feel quite regretful for having caused you so much distress.
But now shall our Lord reward and recompense you therefore, and many, I trust, shall pray for you. For to the intent that the more men may take profit of you, I purpose, uncle, as my poor wit and learning will serve me, to record your good counsel not only in our own language, but in the German tongue too.
But now our Lord will reward and repay you for this, and many, I hope, will pray for you. To ensure that more people can benefit from your wisdom, I plan, uncle, as best as I can with my limited knowledge and understanding, to document your valuable advice not only in our own language but also in German.
And thus, praying God to give me, and all others who shall read it, the grace to follow your good counsel, I shall commit you to God.
And so, I pray that God grants me, and everyone else who reads this, the wisdom to follow your good advice. I will entrust you to God.
ANTHONY: Since you be minded, cousin, to bestow so much labour on it, I would it had happed you to fetch the counsel at some wiser man, who could have given you better. But better men may add more things, and better also, thereto. And in the meantime, I beseech our Lord to breathe of his Holy Spirit into the reader's breast, who inwardly may teach him in heart. For without him little availeth all that the mouths of the world would be able to teach in men's ears.
ANTHONY: Since you’re determined, cousin, to put so much effort into it, I wish you had gone to a wiser person who could have given you better advice. But smarter people can contribute more and better things to it. In the meantime, I ask our Lord to inspire the reader's heart with His Holy Spirit, who can teach him from within. Because without that, all the world's talk is of little use to teach people.
And thus, good cousin, farewell, till God bring us together again, either here or in heaven. Amen.
And so, dear cousin, goodbye, until God reunites us, either here or in heaven. Amen.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!