This is a modern-English version of Artificial Light: Its Influence upon Civilization, originally written by Luckiesh, Matthew.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Transcriber's Notes:
Transcriber's Notes:
- Inconsistent hyphenation of words preserved.
- Several misprints corrected. Hover over underlined word in the text to see the corrections made. A full list of corrections can be found at the end of the text.
- On page 19, Aristophanes's period is noted as (488-385 B. C.); Aristophanes was born circa 448 B. C.
The Century Books of Useful Science
Artificial Light
ITS INFLUENCE UPON CIVILIZATION
BY
M. LUCKIESH
DIRECTOR OF APPLIED SCIENCE. NELA RESEARCH LABORATORY,
NATIONAL LAMP WORKS OF GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Author of "Color and Its Applications," "Light and Shade
and Their Applications," "The Lighting Art,"
"The Language of Color," etc.
ILLUSTRATED WITH PHOTOGRAPHS

NEW YORK
THE CENTURY CO.
1920
Copyright, 1920, by
The Century Co.
Copyright, 1920, by
The Century Co.
DEDICATED
TO THOSE WHO HAVE ENCOURAGED
ORGANIZED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOR
THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVILIZATION
DEDICATED
TO THOSE WHO HAVE SUPPORTED
STRUCTURED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOR
THE PROGRESS OF CIVILIZATION
PREFACE
In the following pages I have endeavored to discuss artificial light for the general reader, in a manner as devoid as possible of intricate details. The early chapters deal particularly with primitive artificial light and their contents are generally historical. The science of light-production may be considered to have been born in the latter part of the eighteenth century and beginning with that period a few chapters treat of the development of artificial light up to the present time. Until the middle of the nineteenth century mere light was available, but as the century progressed, the light-sources through the application of science became more powerful and efficient. Gradually mere light grew to more light and in the dawn of the twentieth century adequate light became available. In a single century, after the development of artificial light began in earnest, the efficiency of light-production increased fifty-fold and the cost diminished correspondingly. The next group of chapters deals with various economic influences of artificial light and with some of the byways in which artificial light is serving mankind. On passing through the spectacular aspects of lighting we finally emerge into the esthetics of light and lighting.
In the following pages, I’ve tried to discuss artificial light for the general reader in a way that avoids complicated details. The early chapters focus on primitive artificial light and are mainly historical. The science of light production can be seen as having started in the late eighteenth century, and from that point, a few chapters cover the development of artificial light up to today. Until the mid-nineteenth century, only basic light was available, but as the century continued, light sources became more powerful and efficient thanks to scientific advancements. Gradually, basic light evolved into better light, and by the dawn of the twentieth century, adequate light became accessible. In just one century, after serious development of artificial light began, the efficiency of light production increased fifty-fold while the cost dropped significantly. The next group of chapters explores various economic impacts of artificial light and some of the ways it benefits humanity. After examining the dramatic aspects of lighting, we finally move into the aesthetics of light and lighting.
The aim has been to show that artificial light has become intricately interwoven with human activities and that it has been a powerful influence upon the progress of civilization. The subject is too extensive to be treated in detail in a single volume, but an effort has been made to present a discussion fairly complete in scope. It is hoped that the reader will gain a greater appreciation of artificial light as an economic factor, as an artistic medium, and as a mighty influence upon the safety, efficiency, health, happiness, and general progress of mankind.
The goal has been to show that artificial light has become deeply integrated into human activities and that it has significantly impacted the advancement of civilization. The topic is too broad to cover in detail in a single book, but an effort has been made to provide a discussion that is fairly comprehensive in scope. It is hoped that the reader will develop a greater appreciation for artificial light as an economic factor, an artistic medium, and a major influence on safety, efficiency, health, happiness, and the overall progress of humanity.
M. Luckiesh.
M. Luckiesh.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
It is a pleasant duty to acknowledge the coöperation of various companies in obtaining the photographs which illustrate this book. With the exception of Plates 2 and 7, which are reproduced from the excellent works of Benesch and Allegemane respectively, the illustrations of early lighting devices are taken from an historical collection in the possession of the National Lamp Works of the General Electric Co. To this company the author is indebted for Plates 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 15, 18b, 20, 21, 29; to Dr. McFarlan Moore for Plate 10; to Macbeth Evans Glass Co. for Plate 12; to the Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army, for Plate 13; to Lynn Works of G. E. Co. for Plates 14, 16; to Edison Lamp Works of G. E. Co. for Plates 17, 24; to Cooper Hewitt Co. for Plate 18a; to R. U. V. Co. for Plate 19; to New York Edison Co. for Plates 22, 26, 30; to W. D'A. Ryan and the Schenectady Works of G. E. Co. for Plates 23, 25, 31; to National X-Ray Reflector Co. for Plate 28. Besides the companies and the individuals particularly involved in the foregoing, the author is glad to acknowledge his appreciation of the assistance of others during the preparation of this volume.
It’s a pleasure to acknowledge the cooperation of various companies in providing the photographs that illustrate this book. Except for Plates 2 and 7, which are taken from the outstanding works of Benesch and Allegemane respectively, the illustrations of early lighting devices come from a historical collection owned by the National Lamp Works of the General Electric Co. The author is grateful to this company for Plates 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 15, 18b, 20, 21, 29; to Dr. McFarlan Moore for Plate 10; to Macbeth Evans Glass Co. for Plate 12; to the Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, for Plate 13; to Lynn Works of G.E. Co. for Plates 14, 16; to Edison Lamp Works of G.E. Co. for Plates 17, 24; to Cooper Hewitt Co. for Plate 18a; to R.U.V. Co. for Plate 19; to New York Edison Co. for Plates 22, 26, 30; to W.D'A. Ryan and the Schenectady Works of G.E. Co. for Plates 23, 25, 31; to National X-Ray Reflector Co. for Plate 28. In addition to the companies and individuals mentioned above, the author is grateful for the assistance of others during the preparation of this volume.
CONTENTS
CHAPTER | PAGE | |
---|---|---|
I | Light and Progress | 3 |
II | The Art of Making Fire | 15 |
III | Primitive Light-Sources | 24 |
IV | The Ceremonial Use of Light | 38 |
V | Oil-Lamps of the Nineteenth Century | 51 |
VI | Early Gas-Lighting | 63 |
VII | The Science of Light-Production | 80 |
VIII | Modern Gas-Lighting | 97 |
IX | The Electric Arcs | 111 |
X | The Electric Incandescent Filament Lamps | 127 |
XI | The Light of the Future | 143 |
XII | Lighting the Streets | 152 |
XIII | Lighthouses | 163 |
XIV | Artificial Light in Warfare | 178 |
XV | Signaling | 194 |
XVI | The Cost of Light | 208 |
XVII | Light and Safety | 225 |
XVIII | The Cost of Living | 238 |
XIX | Artificial Light and Chemistry | 256 |
XX | Light and Health | 269 |
XXI | Modifying Artificial Light | 284 |
XXII | Spectacular Lighting | 298 |
XXIII | The Expressiveness of Light | 310 |
XXIV | Lighting the Home | 325 |
XXV | Lighting—A Fine Art? | 341 |
Reading References | 357 | |
Index | 359 |
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT
I
LIGHT AND PROGRESS
The human race was born in slavery, totally subservient to nature. The earliest primitive beings feasted or starved according to nature's bounty and sweltered or shivered according to the weather. When night fell they sought shelter with animal instinct, for not only were activities almost completely curtailed by darkness but beyond its screen lurked many dangers. It is interesting to philosophize upon a distinction between a human being and the animal just below him in the scale, but it may serve the present purpose to distinguish the human being as that animal in whom there is an unquenchable and insatiable desire for independence. The effort to escape from the bondage of nature is not solely a human instinct; animals burrow or build retreats through the instinct of self-preservation. But this instinct in animals is soon satisfied, whereas in human beings it has been leading ever onward toward complete emancipation.
The human race started in slavery, completely dependent on nature. The earliest primitive beings either thrived or went hungry based on nature's resources and dealt with heat or cold based on the weather. When night came, they looked for shelter like animals, since not only did their activities almost completely stop in the dark, but many dangers lurked beyond it. It's interesting to think about the difference between a human and the animal just below them on the hierarchy, but for now, we can define a human as the animal that has an unquenchable and insatiable desire for freedom. While the urge to break free from nature's constraints isn’t exclusive to humans—since animals dig or create shelters out of self-preservation—this instinct is quickly satisfied in animals. In humans, however, it has driven a constant pursuit of total liberation.
The progress of civilization is a long chain of countless achievements each one of which has increased man's independence. Early man perhaps did not conceive the idea of fire and then set out to produce it. His infant mind did not operate in this manner. But when he accidentally struck a spark, produced fire by friction, or discovered it in some other manner, he saw its possibility. It is thrilling to picture primitive man at his first bonfire, enjoying the warmth, or at least interested in it. But how wonderful it must have become as twilight's curtain was drawn across the heavens! This controllable fire emitted light. It is easy to imagine primitive man pondering over this phenomenon with his sluggish mind. Doubtless he cautiously picked up a flaming stick and timidly explored the crowding darkness. Perhaps he carried it into his cave and behold! night had retreated from his abode! No longer was it necessary for him to retire to his bed of leaves when daylight failed. The fire not only banished the chill of night but was a power over darkness. Viewed from the standpoint of civilization, its discovery was one of the greatest strides along the highway of human progress. The activities of man were no longer bounded by sunrise and sunset. The march of civilization had begun.
The progress of civilization is a long chain of countless achievements, each one of which has increased humanity's independence. Early humans probably didn’t imagine creating fire and then setting out to do it. Their minds didn’t work like that. But when they accidentally struck a spark, created fire by friction, or found it in some other way, they recognized its potential. It's exciting to picture primitive people at their first bonfire, enjoying the warmth or at least being curious about it. But how amazing it must have been as dusk fell over the sky! This controllable fire gave off light. It’s easy to imagine primitive humans thinking about this phenomenon with their slow minds. They likely picked up a burning stick and cautiously explored the surrounding darkness. Maybe they carried it into their cave and, behold! Night had retreated from their home! There was no longer a need to go to bed made of leaves when daylight faded. The fire not only chased away the chill of night but also had power over darkness. From a civilization perspective, its discovery was one of the greatest steps along the path of human progress. Human activities were no longer limited by sunrise and sunset. The march of civilization had begun.
In the present age of abundant artificial light, with its manifold light-sources and accessories which have made possible countless applications of light, mankind does not realize the importance of this comfort. Its wonderful convenience and omnipresence have resulted in indifference toward it by mankind in general, notwithstanding the fact that it is essential to man's most important and educative sense. By extinguishing the light and pondering upon his helplessness in the resulting darkness, man may gain an idea of its overwhelming importance. Those unfortunate persons who suffer the terrible calamity of blindness after years of dependence upon sight will testify in heartrending terms to the importance of light. Milton, whose eyesight had failed, laments,
In today’s world filled with artificial light from various sources and tools that have enabled endless uses of light, people tend to overlook how vital this comfort really is. Its remarkable convenience and constant presence have led to a general indifference among people, even though it’s crucial for our most significant and educational sense. By turning off the lights and reflecting on their vulnerability in the resulting darkness, individuals can begin to understand its immense importance. Those unfortunate individuals who experience the devastating loss of sight after years of relying on vision will express in poignant ways just how critical light is. Milton, who lost his eyesight, mourns,
O first created beam and thou great Word
O first created beam and you great Word
"Let there be light," and light was over all,
"Let there be light," and light shone everywhere,
Why am I thus bereaved thy prime decree?
Why am I left with this loss from your main decision?
Perhaps only through a similar loss would one fully appreciate the tremendous importance of light to him, but imagination should be capable of convincing him that it is one of the most essential and pleasure-giving phenomena known to mankind.
Maybe only by experiencing a similar loss would someone truly understand how incredibly important light is to him, but imagination should be enough to make him realize that it is one of the most essential and enjoyable things known to humanity.
A retrospective view down the vista of centuries reveals by contrast the complexity with which artificial light is woven into human activities of the present time. Written history fails long before the primitive races are reached, but it is safe to trust the imagination to penetrate the fog of unwritten history and find early man huddled in his cave as daylight wanes. Impelled by the restless spirit of progress, this primitive being grasped the opportunity which fire afforded to extend his activities beyond the boundaries of daylight. The crude art upon the walls of his cave was executed by the flame of a smoking fagot. The fire on the ledge at the entrance to his abode became a symbol of home, as the fire on the hearth has symbolized home and hospitality throughout succeeding ages. The accompanying light and the protection from cold combined to establish the home circle. The ties of mated animals expanded through these influences to the bonds of family. Thus light was woven early into family life and has been throughout the ages a moralizing and civilizing influence. To-day the residence functions as a home mainly under artificial light, for owing to the conditions of living and working, the family group gathers chiefly after daylight has failed.
A look back over the centuries shows how complexly artificial light is integrated into our daily lives today. Written history stops long before we reach the time of primitive cultures, but we can imagine early humans huddled in their caves as the sun sets. Driven by a desire for progress, these early humans took advantage of fire to expand their activities beyond daylight. The simple art on the walls of their caves was created by the light of a burning piece of wood. The fire at the entrance of their home became a symbol of family, just like fire in the hearth has represented home and hospitality throughout history. The warmth and light from the fire helped create a cozy home environment. The bonds between paired animals grew into family connections due to these influences. So, light was woven into family life early on and has always been a moral and civilizing force. Today, homes primarily function with artificial light, as families tend to gather mostly after dark due to modern living and working conditions.
From the pine knot of primitive man to the wonderfully convenient light-sources of to-day there is a great interval, consisting, as appears retrospectively, of small and simple steps long periods apart. Measured by present standards and achievements, development was slow at first and modern man may be inclined to impatience as he views the history of light and human progress. But the achievements of early centuries, which appear so simple at the present time, were really great accomplishments when considered in the light of the knowledge of those remote periods. Science as it exists to-day is founded upon proved facts. The scientist, equipped with a knowledge of physical and chemical laws, is led by his imagination into the darkness of the unexplored unknown. This knowledge illuminates the pathway so that hypotheses are intelligently formed. These evolve into theories which are gradually altered to fit the accumulating facts, for along the battle area of progress there are innumerable scouting-parties gaining secrets from nature. These are supported by individuals and by groups, who verify, amplify, and organize the facts, and they in turn are followed by inventors who apply them. Liaison is maintained at all points, but the attack varies from time to time. It may be intense at certain places and other sectors may be quiet for a time. There are occasional reverses, but the whole line in general progresses. Each year witnesses the acquirement of new territory. It is seen that through the centuries there is an ever-growing momentum as knowledge, efficiency, and organization increase the strength of this invading army of scientists and inventors.
From the pine knot used by early humans to today’s incredibly convenient light sources, there’s a significant gap that, in retrospect, consists of small and simple steps taken over long periods. By today’s standards, progress seemed slow at first, and modern people might feel impatient when looking at the history of light and human advancement. However, the achievements of earlier centuries, which seem so basic now, were actually significant milestones given the level of knowledge back then. Modern science is built on proven facts. Scientists, armed with an understanding of physical and chemical laws, use their imagination to explore the unknown. This knowledge lights the way, allowing for the intelligent formation of hypotheses. These evolve into theories that are gradually adjusted to match the growing body of facts, as countless explorers uncover nature's secrets. These efforts are backed by individuals and groups who verify, expand, and organize the facts, which are then utilized by inventors. Communication is maintained at every stage, but the pace of progress can vary. Some areas may see intense focus while others remain quiet for a time. There are occasional setbacks, but overall progress continues. Each year brings the discovery of new knowledge. Over the centuries, we can see a steadily increasing momentum as knowledge, efficiency, and organization strengthen this advancing army of scientists and inventors.
The burning fagot rescued mankind from the shackles of darkness, and the grease-lamp and tallow-candle have done their part. Progress was slow in those early centuries because the great minds of those ages philosophized without a basis of established facts: scientific progress resulted more from an accumulation of accidental discoveries than by a directed attack of philosophy supported by the facts established by experiment. It was not until comparatively recent times, at most three centuries ago, that the great intellects turned to systematically organized scientific research. Such men as Newton laid the foundation for the tremendous strides of to-day. The store of facts increased and as the attitude changed from philosophizing to investigating, the organized knowledge grew apace. All of this paved the way for the momentous successes of the present time.
The burning torch freed humanity from the grips of darkness, and the oil lamp and candle have played their roles. Progress was slow in those early centuries because the great thinkers of those times contemplated ideas without a solid foundation of established facts: scientific advancements came more from a build-up of chance discoveries than from a focused approach to philosophy backed by experimental evidence. It wasn't until relatively recently, about three centuries ago, that brilliant minds began to engage in systematically organized scientific research. Figures like Newton laid the groundwork for today's incredible advancements. As the collection of facts expanded and the focus shifted from theorizing to investigating, organized knowledge grew rapidly. All of this set the stage for the significant achievements we see today.
The end is not in sight and perhaps never will be. The unexplored region extends to infinity and, judged by the past, the momentum of discovery will continue to increase for ages to come, unless the human race decays through the comfort and ease gained from utilizing the magic secrets which are constantly being wrested from nature. Among the achievements of science and invention, the production and application of artificial light ranks high. As an influence upon civilization, no single achievement surpasses it.
The end isn't in sight and maybe it never will be. The uncharted territory goes on forever, and looking at the past, the pace of discovery will keep increasing for a long time, unless humanity declines due to the comfort and ease gained from using the magical secrets we're always pulling from nature. Among the achievements of science and invention, producing and using artificial light is one of the top accomplishments. No other single achievement has had a greater impact on civilization.
Without artificial light, mankind would be comparatively inactive about one half its lifetime. To-day it has been fairly well established that the human organism can flourish on eight hours' sleep in a period of twenty-four hours. Another eight hours spent in work should settle man's obligation to the world. The remaining hours should be his own. Artificial light has made such a distribution of time possible. The working-periods in many cases may be arranged in the interests of economy, which often means continuous operations. The sun need not be considered when these operations are confined to interiors or localized outdoors.
Without artificial light, people would be relatively inactive for about half of their lifetime. Today, it’s well established that the human body can thrive on eight hours of sleep within a twenty-four-hour period. Another eight hours spent working should cover a person's duty to the world. The remaining hours should be for themselves. Artificial light has made this kind of time management possible. In many cases, work periods can be organized for efficiency, which often means continuous operations. The sun doesn't need to be a factor when these operations are limited to indoor spaces or specific outdoor areas.
Thus, artificial light has been an important factor in the great industrial development of the present time. Man now burrows into the earth, navigates under water, travels upon the surface of land and sea, and soars among the clouds piloted by light of his own making. Progress does not halt at sunset but continues twenty-four hours each day. Building, printing, manufacturing, commerce, and other activities are prosecuted continuously, the working-shifts changing at certain periods regardless of the rising or setting sun. Adequate artificial lighting decreases spoilage, increases production, and is a powerful factor in the prevention of industrial accidents.
Thus, artificial light has played a crucial role in the significant industrial growth we see today. People now dig into the ground, explore underwater, travel across land and sea, and fly through the sky using light they created themselves. Progress doesn’t stop at sunset; it keeps going 24 hours a day. Construction, printing, manufacturing, commerce, and various other activities run continuously, with work shifts changing at specific times, regardless of day or night. Proper artificial lighting reduces waste, boosts production, and is a key factor in preventing industrial accidents.
It has ever been true since the advent of artificial light that the intellect has been largely nourished after the completion of the day's work. The highly developed artificial lighting of the present time may account for much of the vast industry of publication. Books, magazines, and newspapers owe much to convenient and inexpensive artificial light, for without it fewer hours would be available for recreation and advancement through reading. Schools, libraries, and art museums may be attended at night for the betterment of the human race. The immortal Lincoln, it is said, gained his early education largely by the light of the fireplace. But all were not endowed with the persistence of Lincoln, so that illiteracy was more common in his day than in the present age of adequate illumination.
It has always been true since the introduction of artificial light that people's minds have thrived after finishing their work for the day. The advanced artificial lighting we have today likely plays a big role in the booming publishing industry. Books, magazines, and newspapers benefit greatly from convenient and affordable artificial light, because without it, there would be fewer hours for relaxation and learning through reading. Schools, libraries, and art museums can be visited at night to improve humanity. It's said that the great Lincoln gained much of his early education by the light of a fireplace. However, not everyone had Lincoln's determination, which is why illiteracy was more common in his time than it is in today's world of sufficient lighting.
The theatrical stage not only depends for its effectiveness upon artificial light but owes its existence and development largely to this agency. In the moving-picture theater, pictures are projected upon the screen by means of it and even the production of the pictures is independent of daylight. These and a vast number of recreational activities owe much, and in some cases their existence, to artificial light.
The theatrical stage relies not just on artificial light for its effectiveness but has also largely come into being and evolved because of it. In movie theaters, images are projected onto the screen using this light, and the creation of the movies themselves doesn't depend on natural light. A wide range of recreational activities owes a lot, and in some cases their very existence, to artificial light.
Not many centuries ago the streets at night were overrun by thieves and to venture outdoors after dark was to court robbery and even bodily harm. In these days of comparative safety it is difficult to realize the influence that abundant illumination has had in increasing the safety of life and property. Maeterlinck in his poetical drama, "The Bluebird," appropriately has made Light the faithful companion of mankind. The Palace of Night, into which Light is not permitted to enter, is the abode of many evils. Thus the poet has played upon the primitive instincts of the impressiveness of light and darkness.
Not too long ago, the streets were filled with thieves at night, and going outside after dark meant risking robbery and even physical harm. Nowadays, with the relative safety we experience, it's hard to appreciate how much bright lighting has improved the safety of life and property. Maeterlinck, in his play "The Bluebird," fittingly makes Light the loyal companion of humanity. The Palace of Night, where Light is not allowed to enter, is home to many evils. This allows the poet to explore the deep-rooted instincts associated with light and darkness.
By combining the symbolism of light, color, and darkness with the instincts which have been inherited by mankind from its superstitious ancestry of the age of mythology, another field of application of artificial light is opened. Light has gradually assumed such attributes as truth, knowledge, progress, enlightenment. Throughout the early ages light was more or less worshiped and thus artificial lights became woven in many religious ceremonies. Some of these have persisted to the present time. The great pageants of peace celebrations and world's expositions appropriately feature artificial light. In drawing upon the potentiality of the expressiveness and impressiveness of light and color, artificial light is playing a major part. Doubtless the future generations will be entertained by gorgeous symphonies of light. Experiments are performed in this direction now and then, and it is reasonable to expect that after many centuries of cultivation of the appreciation of light-symphonies, these will take a place among the arts. The elaborate and complicated music of the present time is appreciated by civilized nations only after many centuries of slow cultivation of taste and understanding.
By merging the symbolism of light, color, and darkness with the instincts that humanity has inherited from its superstitious ancestors from the age of mythology, we open up another area for the use of artificial light. Light has gradually taken on meanings like truth, knowledge, progress, and enlightenment. In ancient times, light was revered, so artificial lights became an integral part of many religious ceremonies. Some of these traditions continue to this day. Major peace celebrations and world expositions prominently feature artificial light. By tapping into the expressive and impressive potential of light and color, artificial light plays a significant role. Future generations will undoubtedly be dazzled by beautiful displays of light. Experiments in this area happen from time to time, and it’s reasonable to expect that after centuries of developing an appreciation for light displays, these will become recognized as an art form. The complex and intricate music of today is appreciated by civilized societies only after many centuries of gradual refinement of taste and understanding.
Light-therapy is to-day a distinct science and art. The germicidal action of light-rays and of some of the invisible rays which ordinarily accompany the luminous rays is well proved. Wounds are treated effectively and water is sterilized by the ultraviolet radiant energy in modern artificial illuminants.
Light therapy is now a distinct science and art. The germicidal effects of light rays and some of the invisible rays that typically accompany visible light are well established. Wounds are effectively treated, and water is sterilized using the ultraviolet energy from modern artificial lighting.
Thousands of lighthouses, light-ships, and light-buoys are scattered along sea-coasts, rivers, and channels. They guide the wheelman and warn the lookout of shoals and reefs. Some of these send forth flashes of light whose intensities are measured in millions of candle-power. Many are unattended for days and even months. These powerful lights dominated by automatic mechanisms have replaced the wood-fires which were maintained a few centuries ago upon certain prominent points.
Thousands of lighthouses, light ships, and light buoys are found along coastlines, rivers, and waterways. They help guide the navigator and alert the lookout to shallow areas and reefs. Some of these emit flashes of light with intensities measured in millions of candle-power. Many operate unattended for days or even months. These strong lights, controlled by automatic systems, have taken the place of the wood fires that were maintained on certain prominent points a few centuries ago.
Signal-lights now guide the railroad train through the night. A burning flare dropped from the rear of a train keeps the following train at a safe distance. Huge search-lights penetrate the night air for many miles. When these are equipped with shutters, a code may be flashed from one ship to another or between the vessel and land. A code from a powerful search-light has been read a hundred miles away because the flashes were projected upon a layer of high clouds and were thus visible far beyond the horizon.
Signal lights now guide the train through the night. A burning flare dropped from the back of a train keeps the following train at a safe distance. Huge searchlights cut through the night air for miles. When these are fitted with shutters, a code can be sent from one ship to another or between the ship and the shore. A code from a powerful searchlight has been read a hundred miles away because the flashes were aimed at a layer of high clouds, making them visible far beyond the horizon.
Artificial light played its part in the recent war. Huge search-light equipments were devised for portability. This mobile apparatus was utilized against enemy aircraft and in various other ways. Small hand-lamps are used to send out a pencil of light as directed by a pair of sights and the code is flashed by means of a trigger. Raiding-parties are no longer concealed by the curtain of darkness, for rockets and star-shells are used to illuminate large areas. Flares sent upward to drift slowly downward supported by parachutes saved and cost many lives during the recent war. Rockets are used by ships in distress and also by beleaguered troops.
Artificial light played a significant role in the recent war. Huge searchlight equipment was designed for portability. This mobile apparatus was used against enemy aircraft and in various other ways. Small handheld lamps were used to project a beam of light as directed by a pair of sights, and the code was transmitted using a trigger. Raiding parties are no longer hidden by the cover of darkness, as rockets and star shells are employed to light up large areas. Flares launched into the sky drift slowly down, supported by parachutes, saving many lives and costing others during the recent conflict. Rockets are used by ships in distress and by beleaguered troops.
Experiments are being prosecuted to ascertain the possibilities of artificial light in the forcing of plant-growth, and even chickens are made to work longer hours by its use.
Experiments are being conducted to explore the potential of artificial light in promoting plant growth, and even chickens are made to work longer hours with its use.
Artificial light is now modified in color or spectral character to meet many requirements. Daylight has been reproduced in spectral quality so that certain processes requiring accurate discrimination of color are now prosecuted twenty-four hours a day under artificial daylight. Colored light is made of the correct quality which does not affect photographic plates of various sensibilities. Monochromatic light is utilized in photo-micrography for the best rendition of detail. Light-waves have been utilized as standards of length because they are invariable and fundamental. Numerous other interesting adaptations of artificial light are in daily use.
Artificial light is now adjusted in color and quality to meet various needs. We've recreated daylight to such a precise spectral quality that certain tasks needing accurate color differentiation can now be done 24/7 under artificial daylight. Colored light is produced with the right quality to avoid affecting photographic plates of different sensitivities. Monochromatic light is used in photo-micrography for the best detail representation. Light waves serve as standards of length because they are consistent and fundamental. Many other fascinating uses of artificial light are in everyday use.
This is in reality the age of artificial light, for mankind has not only become independent of daylight in certain respects, but has improved upon natural light. The controllability of artificial light makes it superior to natural light in many ways. In fact, uses have been made of artificial light which are impossible with natural light. Light-sources may be made of a vast variety of shapes, and those may be transported wherever desired. They may be equipped with reflectors and other optical devices to direct or to diffuse the light as required.
This is really the era of artificial light, as humanity has not only become independent of natural daylight in some ways but has also enhanced it. The ability to control artificial light makes it better than natural light in many respects. In fact, there are uses for artificial light that simply can't be achieved with natural light. Light sources can come in various shapes and can be moved anywhere needed. They can also have reflectors and other optical tools added to focus or spread the light as necessary.
Thus, artificial light to-day has numerous advantages over light which has been furnished by the Creator. It is sometimes stated that it can never compete with daylight in cheapness, inasmuch as the latter costs nothing. But this is not true. Even in the residence, daylight costs something, because windows are more expensive than plain walls. The expense of washing windows is an appreciable percentage of the cost of gas or electricity. And there is window-breakage to be considered.
Thus, artificial light today has many advantages over light provided by nature. Some people say that it can never compete with daylight in terms of cost since the latter is free. But that's not accurate. Even in homes, daylight has a cost because windows are pricier than plain walls. The cost of cleaning windows is a significant part of the overall expense of gas or electricity. And we also have to think about the cost of broken windows.
In the more elaborate buildings of the congested portions of cities, daylight is satisfactory a lesser number of hours than in the outlying districts. In some stores, offices, and factories artificial light is used throughout the day. Still, the daylighting-equipment is installed and maintained. Furthermore, when it is considered that much expensive area is given to light-courts and much valuable wall space to windows, it is seen that the cost of daylight in congested cities is in reality considerable. Of course, the daylighting-equipment has value in ventilating, but ventilation may be taken care of in a very satisfactory manner as a separate problem.
In the more complex buildings of crowded city areas, daylight is only good for fewer hours compared to the suburbs. In some stores, offices, and factories, artificial light is used all day long. However, daylighting systems are still installed and maintained. Additionally, when you consider that a lot of expensive space is used for light wells and valuable wall space is taken up by windows, it becomes clear that the cost of daylight in crowded cities is actually quite high. While daylighting systems do help with ventilation, ventilation can be effectively managed as a separate issue.
The cost of skylights in museums and other large buildings is far greater than that of ordinary ceilings and walls, and the extra allowance for heating is appreciable. The expense of maintenance of some skylights is considerable. Thus it is seen that the cost and maintenance of daylighting-equipment, the loss of valuable rental space and of wall area, and the increased expense of heating are factors which challenge the statement that daylight costs nothing. In fact, it is not surprising to find that occasionally the elimination of daylighting—the reliance upon artificial light alone—has been seriously contemplated. When the possibilities of the latter are considered, it is reasonable to expect that it will make greater and greater inroads and that many buildings of the future will be equipped solely with artificial-lighting systems.
The cost of skylights in museums and other large buildings is much higher than that of regular ceilings and walls, and the additional heating costs are significant. The maintenance of some skylights can also be quite expensive. Therefore, it’s clear that the costs and upkeep of daylighting, the loss of valuable rental space and wall area, and the increased heating expenses challenge the idea that daylight is free. In fact, it’s not surprising that the complete removal of daylighting—relying only on artificial light—has been considered seriously at times. When looking at the potential of artificial lighting, it’s reasonable to expect that it will continue to take over, and many buildings in the future will be designed only with artificial lighting systems.
Naturally, with the tremendous development of artificial light during the present age, a new profession has arisen. The lighting expert is evolving to fill the needs. He is studying the problems of producing and utilizing artificial illumination. He deals with the physics of light-production. His studies of utilization carry him into the vast fields of physiology and psychology. His is a profession which eventually will lead into numerous highways and byways of enterprise, because the possibilities of lighting extend into all those activities which make their appeal to consciousness through the doorway of vision. These possibilities are limited only by the boundaries of human endeavor and in the broadest sense extend even beyond them, for light is one of the most prominent agencies in the scheme of creation. It contributes largely to the safety, the efficiency, and the happiness of civilized beings and beyond all it is a powerful civilizing agency.
Naturally, with the tremendous development of artificial light in today's world, a new profession has arisen. The lighting expert is evolving to meet the needs. They are studying the challenges of producing and using artificial light. They work with the science of how light is created. Their studies on usage take them into the extensive areas of physiology and psychology. This profession will eventually lead to many pathways in business, as the potential of lighting extends into all activities that appeal to our awareness through the sense of sight. These possibilities are limited only by the boundaries of human effort and, in the broadest sense, go even beyond them, because light is one of the most significant forces in the process of creation. It plays a crucial role in the safety, efficiency, and happiness of civilized people, and above all, it is a powerful force for civilization.
II
THE ART OF MAKING FIRE
Scattered over the earth at the present time various stages of civilization are to be found, from the primitive savages to the most highly cultivated peoples. Although it is possible that there are tribes of lowly beings on earth to-day unfamiliar with fire or ignorant of its uses, savages are generally able to make fire. Thus the use of fire may serve the purpose of distinguishing human beings from the lower animals. Surely the savage of to-day who is unable to kindle fire or who possesses a mind as yet insufficiently developed to realize its possibilities, is quite at the mercy of nature's whims. He lives merely by animal prowess and differs little in deeds and needs from the beasts of the jungle. In this imaginary journey to the remote regions beyond the outskirts of civilization it soon becomes evident that the development of artificial light may be a fair measure of civilization.
Scattered across the globe today are various stages of civilization, ranging from primitive tribes to the most advanced societies. While it's possible that there are some tribes on Earth today that don't know about fire or how to use it, most savages can create fire. This ability to use fire can help distinguish humans from lower animals. Certainly, a modern savage who cannot start a fire or has not developed the understanding to appreciate its potential is completely at the mercy of nature's unpredictability. They survive purely through basic instincts and don't differ much in actions and needs from jungle animals. In this hypothetical journey to distant areas outside of civilization, it quickly becomes clear that the development of artificial light could be a good indicator of a society's advancement.
In viewing the development of artificial light it is seen that preceding the modern electrical age, man depended universally upon burning material. Obviously, the course of civilization has been highly complex and cannot be symbolized adequately by the branching tree. From its obscure beginning far in the impenetrable fog of prehistoric times, it has branched here and there. These various branches have been subjected to many different influences, with the result that some flourished and endured, some retrogressed, some died, some went to seed and fell to take root and to begin again the upward climb. The ultimate result is the varied civilization of the present time, a study of which aids in penetrating the veil that obscures the ages of unrecorded writing. Likewise, material relics of bygone ages supply some threads of the story of human progress and mythology aids in spanning the misty gap between the earliest ages of man and the period when historic writings were begun. Throughout these various stages it becomes manifest that the development of artificial light is associated with the progress of mankind.
In looking at the development of artificial light, it’s clear that before the modern electrical age, people relied entirely on burning materials. The journey of civilization has been incredibly complex and can't be captured just by a branching tree. Starting from its obscure origins in the dense fog of prehistoric times, it has branched out in many ways. These different branches have faced various influences, leading to some thriving and lasting, some declining, some fading away, and others seeding new growth to begin the upward journey again. The end result is the diverse civilization we see today, and studying it helps us understand the mystery surrounding the ages of unrecorded history. Likewise, physical artifacts from past times provide clues about human progress, and mythology helps bridge the unclear gap between humanity's earliest days and the time when written history started. Throughout these different stages, it's evident that the development of artificial light is linked to human advancement.
According to a certain myth, Prometheus stole fire from heaven and brought this blessing to earth. Throughout the mythologies of various races, fire and, as a consequence, light have been associated with divinity. They have been subjects of worship perhaps more generally than anything else, and these early impressions have survived in the ceremonial uses of light and fire even to the present time. The origin of fire as represented in any of the myths of the superstitious beings of early ages is as suitable as any other, inasmuch as definite knowledge is unavailable. Active volcanoes, spontaneous combustion, friction, accidental focusing of the sun's image, and other means may have introduced primitive beings to fire. A study of savage tribes of the present age combined with a survey of past history of mythology, of material relics, and of the absence of lamps or other lighting utensils leads to the conclusion that the earliest source of light was the wood fire.
According to a certain myth, Prometheus took fire from the gods and brought this gift to earth. Across the mythologies of different cultures, fire and, by extension, light have been linked to divinity. They have been objects of worship perhaps more than anything else, and these early beliefs continue in the ceremonial use of light and fire even today. The origin of fire, as depicted in the myths of ancient superstitious beings, is as valid as any other, since we lack definite knowledge. Active volcanoes, spontaneous combustion, friction, the accidental focusing of sunlight, and other methods could have introduced early humans to fire. A study of contemporary tribal societies, along with an examination of historical mythology, material remains, and the absence of lamps or lighting tools, leads to the conclusion that the earliest source of light was wood fire.
Even to-day the savages of remote lands have not advanced further than the wood-fire stage, and they may be found kneeling upon the ground energetically but skilfully rubbing sticks together until the friction kindles a fire. In using these fire-sticks they convert mechanical energy into heat energy. This is a fundamental principle of physics, employed by them as necessity demands, but they are totally ignorant of it as a scientific law. The things which these savages learn are the result of accidental discovery. Until man pondered over such simple facts and coördinated them so that he could extend his knowledge by general reasoning, his progress could not be rapid. But the sluggish mind of primitive man is capable of devising improvements, however slowly, and the art of making fire by means of rubbing fire-sticks gradually became more refined. Mechanical improvements resulted from experience, with the consequence that finally one stick was rubbed to and fro in a groove, or was rapidly twirled between the palms of the hands while one end was pressed firmly into a hole in a piece of wood. In the course of a few seconds or a minute, depending upon skill and other conditions, a fire was obtained. It is interesting to note how civilized man is often compelled by necessity to adopt the methods of primitive beings. The rubbing of sticks is an emergency measure of the master of woodcraft at the present time, and the production of fire in this manner is the proud accomplishment or ambition of every Boy Scout.
Even today, the inhabitants of remote areas have not progressed beyond using a wood fire. You can find them kneeling on the ground, energetically yet skillfully rubbing sticks together until the friction creates a flame. By using these fire-sticks, they transform mechanical energy into heat energy. This is a basic principle of physics that they use out of necessity, but they have no concept of it as a scientific law. What these people learn comes from accidental discoveries. Until humans contemplated such simple facts and connected them in a way that allowed for knowledge expansion through reasoning, their progress was slow. However, primitive people have the ability to devise improvements, albeit gradually, and the technique of creating fire by rubbing sticks became more refined over time. Mechanical enhancements arose from experience, leading to methods where one stick was rubbed back and forth in a groove or rapidly twirled between the palms while one end was pressed firmly into a hole in a piece of wood. In a few seconds or a minute, depending on skill and conditions, a fire could be started. It's interesting to see how modern humans sometimes have to resort to the methods of primitive people out of necessity. The rubbing of sticks has become an emergency skill for today's woodcraft experts, and generating fire this way is a proud achievement or goal for every Boy Scout.
Where only such crude means of kindling fire were available it became the custom in some cases to maintain a fire burning continuously in a public place. Around this pyrtaneum the various civil, political, and religious affairs were carried on by the light and warmth of the public fire. Many quaint customs evolved, apparently, from this ancient procedure.
Where only basic ways to start a fire were available, it became common in some cases to keep a fire burning continuously in a public space. Around this communal fire, various civil, political, and religious activities were conducted by its light and warmth. Many interesting customs apparently developed from this ancient practice.
The tinder-box of modern centuries doubtless originated in very early times, for it is inconceivable that the earliest beings did not become aware of the production of sparks when certain stones were struck together. In the stone age, when human beings spent much of their time chiseling implements and utensils from stone by means of tools of the same substance, it appears certain that this means of producing fire was ever apparent. Many of their sharp implements, such as knives and arrow-heads, were made of quartz and similar material and it is likely that the use of two pieces of quartz for producing a spark originated in those remote periods. Alaskan and Aleutian tribes are known to have employed two pieces of quartz covered with native sulphur. When these were struck together with skill, excellent sparks were obtained.
The modern tinder-box definitely has its roots in ancient times, as it's hard to believe that early humans didn't notice the sparks created when certain stones were struck together. During the Stone Age, when people spent a lot of time shaping tools and utensils out of stone using tools made of the same material, it seems clear that this method of making fire was always evident. Many of their sharp tools, like knives and arrowheads, were made of quartz and similar materials, so it’s likely that the practice of using two pieces of quartz to create a spark began in those early times. Tribes in Alaska and the Aleutians used two pieces of quartz covered with native sulfur, and when struck together skillfully, they produced excellent sparks.
Later, when iron and steel became available, the more modern tinder-box was developed. An early application of the flint-and-steel principle was made by certain Esquimo tribes who obtained fire by striking a piece of quartz against a piece of iron pyrites. The latter is a yellow sulphide of iron, of crystalline form, best known as "fool's gold." Doubtless, the more primitive beings used dried grass, leaves, and moss as inflammable material upon which the sparks were showered. In later centuries the tinder-box was filled with charred grass, linen, and paper. There was a long interval between the development of fire-sticks and that of the tinder-box as measured by the progress of civilization. During recent centuries ordinary brown paper soaked in saltpeter and dried was utilized satisfactorily as an inflammable material. Such devices have been employed in past ages in widely separated regions of the earth. Elaborate specimens of tinder-boxes from Jamaica, Japan, China, Europe, and various other countries are now reposing in the collections in the possession of museums and of individuals.
Later, when iron and steel became available, the more modern tinderbox was developed. An early use of the flint-and-steel method was made by some Eskimo tribes who created fire by striking a piece of quartz against a piece of iron pyrites. The latter is a yellow sulfide of iron, in crystalline form, best known as "fool's gold." It's likely that primitive people used dried grass, leaves, and moss as flammable materials where the sparks landed. In later centuries, the tinderbox was filled with charred grass, linen, and paper. There was a significant gap between the invention of fire-sticks and the development of the tinderbox as indicated by the advancement of civilization. In recent centuries, ordinary brown paper soaked in saltpeter and dried was effectively used as a flammable material. Such devices have been used in different times and places around the world. Intricate examples of tinderboxes from Jamaica, Japan, China, Europe, and several other countries are now resting in collections held by museums and individuals.
If the radiant energy from the sun is sufficiently concentrated upon inflammable material, the latter will ignite. Such concentration may be achieved by means of a convex lens or a concave mirror. This method of producing fire does not antedate the more primitive methods such as striking quartz or rubbing wooden sticks, because the materials required are not readily found or prepared, but it is of very remote origin. Aristophanes in his comedy "The Clouds," which is a satire aimed at the science and philosophy of his period (488-385 B. C.), mentions the "burning lens." Nearly every one is familiar with an achievement attributed to Archimedes in which he destroyed the ships at Syracuse by focusing the image of the sun upon them by means of a concave mirror. The ancient Egyptians were proficient in the art of glass-making, so it is likely that the "burning-glass" was employed by them. Even a crude lens of glass will focus an image of the sun sufficiently well to cause inflammable material to ignite.
If the sunlight is concentrated enough on flammable material, it will catch fire. This concentration can be achieved using a convex lens or a concave mirror. This way of starting a fire isn’t older than more basic methods like striking quartz or rubbing sticks together, mainly because the necessary materials aren't easy to find or prepare, but it has existed for a very long time. Aristophanes mentions the "burning lens" in his comedy "The Clouds," which satirizes the science and philosophy of his time (488-385 B.C.). Most people know about an event attributed to Archimedes, where he allegedly destroyed ships at Syracuse by focusing sunlight on them with a concave mirror. The ancient Egyptians were skilled in glass-making, so it's likely they used a "burning glass." Even a simple glass lens can focus sunlight well enough to ignite flammable materials.
The energy in sunlight varies enormously, even on clear days, because the water-vapor in the atmosphere absorbs some of the radiant energy emitted by the sun. This absorbed radiation is chiefly known as infra-red energy, which does not arouse the sensation of light. When the water-vapor content of the atmosphere is high, the sun, though it may appear as bright to the eye, in reality is not as hot as it would be if the water-vapor were not present. However, a fire may be kindled by concentrating only the visible rays in sunlight because of the enormous intensity of sunlight. A convex lens fashioned from ice by means of a sharp-edged stone and finally shaped by melting the surfaces as they are rubbed in the palms of the hands, will kindle a fire in highly inflammable material if the sun is high and the atmosphere is fairly clear. Burning-glasses are used to a considerable extent at the present time in certain countries and it is reported that British soldiers were supplied with them during the Boer War. Indicative of the predominant use to which the glass lens was applied in the past is the employment of the term "burning-glass" instead of lens in the scientific writings as late as a century or two ago.
The energy in sunlight varies a lot, even on clear days, because the water vapor in the atmosphere absorbs some of the radiated energy from the sun. This absorbed radiation is mainly known as infrared energy, which doesn’t produce a sensation of light. When the water vapor content in the atmosphere is high, the sun, although it may seem bright to our eyes, isn’t as hot as it would be if the water vapor weren’t there. However, a fire can be started by concentrating just the visible rays of sunlight because of the intense power of sunlight. A convex lens made from ice, shaped with a sharp-edged stone and then refined by rubbing the surfaces in the palms of your hands, can ignite a fire in highly flammable materials if the sun is high and the atmosphere is relatively clear. Burning glasses are still widely used in some countries today, and it’s reported that British soldiers were given them during the Boer War. The term "burning-glass" was commonly used instead of lens in scientific writings as recently as a century or two ago, highlighting its historical significance.
As civilization advanced, leading intellects began to inquire into the mysteries of nature and the periods of pure philosophy gave way to an era of methodical research. Alchemy and superstition began to retire before the attacks of those pioneers who had the temerity to believe that the scheme of creation involved a vast network of invariable laws. In this manner the powerful sciences of physics and chemistry were born a few centuries ago. Among other things the production of fire and light received attention and the "dark ages" were doomed to end. The crude, uncertain, and inconvenient methods of making fire were replaced by steadily improving scientific devices.
As civilization progressed, leading thinkers started to explore the mysteries of nature, and the age of pure philosophy transitioned into a time of systematic research. Alchemy and superstition began to fade away in the face of those pioneers who had the audacity to believe that the universe operated according to a complex system of unchanging laws. This is how the powerful sciences of physics and chemistry emerged a few centuries ago. Among other things, the production of fire and light was a key focus, signaling the end of the "dark ages." The rough, uncertain, and inconvenient methods of making fire were gradually replaced by increasingly sophisticated scientific devices.
Matches were at first cumbersome, dangerous, and expensive, but these gradually evolved into the safety matches of the present time. Although they were primarily intended for lighting fires and various kinds of lamps, billions of them are now used yearly as convenient light-sources. Smoldering hemp or other material treated with niter and other substances was an early form of match used especially for discharging firearms. The modern wax-taper is an evolutionary form of this type of light-source.
Matches were initially awkward, risky, and costly, but they eventually developed into the safety matches we use today. While they were mainly designed for starting fires and different types of lamps, billions are now used each year as handy light sources. Early matches, made from smoldering hemp or other materials treated with niter and other chemicals, were particularly used for firing firearms. The modern wax taper is an evolved version of this kind of light source.
Phosphorus has long played a dominant rôle in the preparation of matches. The first attempt at making them in their modern form appears to have occurred about 1680. Small pieces of phosphorus were used in connection with small splints of wood dipped in sulphur. This type of match did not come into general use until after the beginning of the nineteenth century, owing to its danger and expense. White or yellow phosphorus is a deadly poison; therefore the progress of the phosphorus match was inhibited until the discovery of the relatively harmless form known as red phosphorus. The first commercial application of this form was made in about 1850.
Phosphorus has played a key role in making matches for a long time. The first attempt to create them in their modern form seems to have happened around 1680. Small pieces of phosphorus were used with tiny wooden splints that were dipped in sulfur. This kind of match didn’t become widely used until after the early 1800s because it was dangerous and costly. White or yellow phosphorus is extremely toxic, so the development of the phosphorus match was slowed down until the relatively safer version known as red phosphorus was discovered. The first commercial use of this type happened around 1850.
An early ingenious device consisted of a piece of phosphorus contained in a tube. A piston fitted snugly into the tube, by means of which the air could be compressed and the phosphorus ignited. Sulphur matches were ignited from the burning tinder, the latter being fired by flint and steel. In 1828 another form of match consisted of a glass tube containing sulphuric acid and surrounded by a mixture of chlorate of potash and sugar. A pair of nippers was supplied with each box of these "matches," by means of which the tip of the glass tube could be broken off. This liberated the acid, which upon mixing with the other ingredients set fire to them. To this contrivance a roll of paper was attached which was ignited by the burning chemicals.
An early clever device featured a piece of phosphorus inside a tube. A piston fit tightly into the tube, allowing the air to be compressed and the phosphorus to ignite. Sulfur matches were lit from the burning tinder, which was sparked using flint and steel. In 1828, another type of match was made with a glass tube filled with sulfuric acid, surrounded by a mix of potassium chlorate and sugar. Each box of these "matches" came with a pair of nippers to break the tip of the glass tube. This released the acid, which, when combined with the other ingredients, ignited them. A roll of paper was attached to this setup, which caught fire from the burning chemicals.
The lucifer or friction matches appeared in about 1827, but successful phosphorus matches were first made in about 1833. The so-called safety match of the present time was invented in the year 1855. To-day, the total daily output of matches reaches millions and perhaps billions. Automatic machinery is employed in preparing the splints of wood and in dipping them into molten paraffin wax and finally into the igniting composition.
The lucifer or friction matches showed up around 1827, but successful phosphorus matches were first created around 1833. The modern safety match was invented in 1855. Today, the total daily output of matches reaches millions and maybe billions. Automatic machines are used to prepare the wood splints, dip them into molten paraffin wax, and finally coat them with the igniting mixture.
During recent years the principle of the tinder-box has been revived in a device in which sparks are produced by rubbing the mineral cerite (a hydrous silicate of cerium and allied metals) against steel. These sparks ignite a gas-jet or a wick soaked in a highly inflammable liquid such as gasolene or alcohol. This device is a tinder-box of the modern scientific age.
In recent years, the idea of the tinder-box has been updated in a device that creates sparks by rubbing the mineral cerite (a hydrous silicate of cerium and related metals) against steel. These sparks ignite either a gas jet or a wick soaked in a highly flammable liquid like gasoline or alcohol. This device is a tinder-box for the modern scientific era.
Naturally with the advent of electricity, electrical sparks came into use for lighting gas-jets and mantles and in isolated instances they have served as light-sources. Doubtless, every one is familiar with the parlor stunt of igniting a gas-jet from the discharge from the finger-tips of static electricity accumulated by shuffling the feet across the floor-rug.
Naturally, with the arrival of electricity, electrical sparks began to be used for lighting gas jets and mantles, and in a few cases, they served as sources of light. Surely, everyone has seen the party trick of lighting a gas jet from the discharge of static electricity built up by shuffling your feet on a rug.
III
PRIMITIVE LIGHT-SOURCES
Many are familiar with the light of the firefly or of its larvæ, the glow-worm, but few persons realize that a vast number of insects and lower organisms are endowed with the superhuman ability of producing light by physiological processes. Apparently the chief function of these lighting-plants within the living bodies is not to provide light in the sense that the human being uses it predominantly. That is, these wonderful light-sources seem to be utilized more for signaling, for luring prey, and for protection than for strictly illuminating-purposes. Much study has been given to the production of light by animals, because the secrets will be extremely valuable to mankind. As one floats over tide-water on a balmy evening after dark and watches the pulsating spots of phosphorescent light emitted by the lowly jellyfishes, his imaginative mood formulates the question, "Why are these lowly organisms endowed with such a wonderful ability?"
Many people are familiar with the light of fireflies or their larvae, the glow-worm, but few realize that a huge number of insects and simpler organisms have the extraordinary ability to produce light through biological processes. It seems that the main purpose of these light-producing organisms within living bodies is not to provide light in the way humans use it mostly. Instead, these amazing light sources appear to be used more for signaling, attracting prey, and protection rather than just for illumination. A lot of research has been done on how animals produce light because these secrets could be incredibly valuable to humanity. As one floats over the water on a warm evening after dark and watches the glowing spots of phosphorescent light given off by jellyfish, they might wonder, "Why are these simple organisms gifted with such a remarkable ability?"
Despite his highly developed mind and body and his boasted superiority, man must go forth and learn the secrets of light-production before he may emancipate himself from darkness. If man could emit light in relative proportion to his size as compared with the firefly, he would need no other torch in the coal-mine. How independent he would be in extreme darkness where his adapted eyes need only a feeble light-source! Primitive man, desiring a light-source and having no means of making fire, imprisoned the glowing insects in a perforated gourd or receptacle of clay, and thus invented the first lantern perhaps before he knew how to make fire. The fireflies of the West Indies emit a continuous glow of considerable luminous intensity and the natives have used these imprisoned insects as light-sources. Thus mankind has exhibited his superiority by adapting the facilities at hand to the growing requirements which his independent nature continuously nourished. His insistent demand for independence in turn has nourished his desire to learn nature's secrets and this desire has increased in intensity throughout the ages.
Even with his highly developed mind and body and his claimed superiority, man must go out and discover the secrets of producing light before he can free himself from darkness. If man could emit light in relation to his size like a firefly, he wouldn’t need any other source of light in the coal mine. Just imagine how independent he would be in complete darkness where his adapted eyes only need a dim light! Primitive man, wanting a source of light and unable to create fire, captured glowing insects in a perforated gourd or clay container, effectively inventing the first lantern, possibly even before he learned to make fire. The fireflies of the West Indies produce a continuous glow with significant brightness, and the locals have used these captured insects as sources of light. In this way, humanity has showcased its superiority by using available resources to meet the growing needs driven by its desire for independence. This relentless pursuit of independence has fueled man's quest to uncover nature's secrets, a desire that has intensified over time.
The act of imprisoning a glowing insect was in itself no greater stride along the highway of progress than the act of picking a tasty fruit from its tree. However, the crude lantern perhaps directed his primitive mind to the possibilities of artificial light. The flaming fagot from the fire was the ancestor of the oil-lamp, the candle, the lantern, and the electric flash-light. It is a matter of conjecture how much time elapsed before his feeble intellect became aware that resinous wood afforded a better light-source than woods which were less inflammable. Nevertheless, pine knots and similar resinous pieces of wood eventually were favored as torches and their use has persisted until the present time. In some instances in ancient times resin was extracted from wood and burned in vessels. This was the forerunner of the grease-and the oil-lamp. In the woods to-day the craftsman of the wilds keeps on the lookout for live trees saturated with highly inflammable ingredients.
The act of capturing a glowing insect wasn’t really a bigger step in progress than picking a delicious fruit from a tree. However, the basic lantern probably led his primitive mind to think about the possibilities of artificial light. The burning stick from the fire was the ancestor of the oil lamp, candle, lantern, and electric flashlight. It’s unknown how much time passed before his limited intellect recognized that resinous wood provided a better light source than less flammable woods. Still, pine knots and similar resin-rich wood eventually became popular as torches, and their use has continued to this day. In some ancient cultures, resin was extracted from wood and burned in containers, which was the precursor to grease and oil lamps. Today, craftsmen in the woods are always on the lookout for live trees filled with highly flammable materials.
Viewed from the present age, these smoking, flickering light-sources appear very crude; nevertheless they represent a wide gulf between their users and those primitive beings who were unacquainted with the art of making fire. Although the wood fire prevailed as a light-source throughout uncounted centuries, it was subjected to more or less improvement as civilization advanced. When the wood fire was brought indoors the day was extended and early man began to develop his crude arts. He thought and planned in the comfort and security of his cave or hut. By the firelight he devised implements and even decorated his stone surroundings with pictures which to-day reveal something of the thoughts and activities of mankind during a civilization which existed many thousand years ago.
From today’s perspective, those smoking, flickering light sources seem very basic; however, they mark a significant gap between their users and the primitive people who didn’t know how to make fire. For countless centuries, wood fires were the main source of light, but they were improved somewhat as civilization progressed. When wood fires were brought indoors, it extended the day, and early humans began to refine their basic skills. They thought and planned in the comfort and safety of their caves or huts. By the light of the fire, they created tools and even decorated their stone surroundings with pictures that, today, give us insight into the thoughts and activities of people during a civilization that existed thousands of years ago.
When it was too warm to have a roaring fire upon the hearth, man devised other means for obtaining light without undue warmth. He placed glowing embers upon ledges in the walls, upon stone slabs, or even upon suspended devices of non-inflammable material. Later he split long splinters of wood from pieces selected for their straightness of grain. These burning splinters emitting a smoking, feeble light were crude but they were refinements of considerable merit. A testimonial of their satisfactoriness is their use throughout many centuries. Until very recent times the burning splinter has been in use in Scotland and in other countries, and it is probable that at present in remote districts of highly civilized countries this crude device serves the meager needs of those whose requirements have been undisturbed by the progress of civilization. Scott, in "The Legend of Montrose," describes a table scene during a feast. Behind each seat a giant Highlander stood, holding a blazing torch of bog-pine. This was also the method of lighting in the Homeric age.
When it was too warm to have a big fire in the fireplace, people came up with other ways to get light without too much heat. They put glowing embers on ledges in the walls, on stone slabs, or even on suspended devices made of non-flammable material. Later, they split long pieces of wood from straight-grained logs. These burning pieces gave off a smoky, weak light; they were basic but had significant improvements. Their effectiveness is proven by the fact that they were used for many centuries. Until very recently, burning splinters were used in Scotland and other places, and it's likely that in remote areas of highly developed countries, this simple method still meets the limited needs of those whose lives have not been affected by the advancements of civilization. Scott, in "The Legend of Montrose," describes a scene at a feast where a giant Highlander stood behind each seat, holding a flaming torch made of bog-pine. This was also how they provided light in the Homeric age.
Crude clay relics representing a human head, from the mouth of which the wood-splinters projected, appear to corroborate the report that the flaming splinter was sometimes held in the mouth in order that both hands of a workman would be free. Splinter-holders of many types have survived, but most of them are of the form of a crude pedestal with a notch or spring clip at its upper end. The splinter was held in this clip and burned for a time depending upon its length and the character of the wood. It was the business of certain individuals to prepare bundles of splinters, which in the later stages of civilization were sold at the market-place or from house to house. Those who have observed the frontiersman even among civilized races will be quite certain that the wood for splinters was selected and split with skill, and that the splinters were burned under conditions which would yield the most satisfactory light. It is a characteristic of those who live close to nature, and are thus limited in facilities, to acquire a surprising efficiency in their primitive activities.
Crude clay figures showing a human head, with wood splinters sticking out of the mouth, seem to confirm the idea that the flaming splinter was sometimes held in the mouth so that a worker's hands would be free. Various types of splinter holders have been found, but most are simple pedestals with a notch or clip at the top. The splinter was held in this clip and burned for a time depending on its length and the type of wood. Certain people were responsible for preparing bundles of splinters, which in later times were sold in markets or door-to-door. Those who have observed frontiersmen, even in civilized societies, will be quite confident that they selected and split the wood for splinters with skill, and that the splinters were burned under conditions that provided the best light. People living close to nature, and thus limited in resources, often develop surprising efficiency in their basic tasks.
An obvious step in the use of burning wood as a light-source was to place such a fire on a shelf or in a cavity in the wall. Later when metal was available, gratings or baskets were suspended from the ceiling or from brackets and glowing embers or flaming chips were placed upon them. Some of these were equipped with crude chimneys to carry away the smoke, and perhaps to increase the draft. In more recent centuries the first attempt at lighting outdoor public places was by means of metal baskets in which flaming wood emitted light. It was the duty of the watchman to keep these baskets supplied with pine knots. In early centuries street-lighting was not attempted, and no serious efforts worthy of consideration as adequate lighting were made earlier than about a century ago. As a consequence the "link-boy" came into existence. With flaming torch he would escort pedestrians to their homes on dark nights. This practice was in vogue so recently that the "link-boy" is remembered by persons still living. In England the profession appears to have existed until about 1840.
An obvious step in using burning wood as a light source was to set a fire on a shelf or in a wall cavity. Later, when metal became available, grates or baskets were hung from the ceiling or from brackets, and glowing embers or burning wood chips were placed on them. Some of these had crude chimneys to carry away the smoke and possibly improve the draft. In more recent centuries, the first efforts to light outdoor public spaces involved metal baskets filled with burning wood for illumination. It was the watchman's responsibility to keep these baskets stocked with pine knots. In earlier centuries, there was no attempt at street lighting, and no serious efforts worthy of consideration as adequate lighting were made until about a century ago. As a result, the "link-boy" emerged. With a flaming torch, he would guide pedestrians to their homes on dark nights. This practice was so recent that the "link-boy" is still remembered by some living people. In England, this profession seems to have existed until around 1840.
Somewhat akin to the wood-splinter, and a forerunner of the candle, was the rushlight. In burning wood man noticed that a resinous or fatty material increased the inflammability and added greatly to the amount of light emitted. It was a logical step to try to reproduce this condition by artificial means. As a consequence rushes were cut and soaked in water. They were then peeled, leaving lengths of pith partially supported by threads of the skin which were not stripped off. These sticks of pith were placed in the sun to bleach and to dry, and after they were thoroughly dry they were dipped in scalding grease, which was saved from cooking operations or was otherwise acquired for the purpose. A reed two or three feet long held in the splinter-holder would burn for about an hour. Thus it is seen that man was beginning to progress in the development of artificial light. In developing the rushlight he was laying the foundation for the invention of the candle. Pliny has mentioned the burning of reeds soaked in oil as a feature of funeral rites. Many crude forerunners of the candle were developed in various parts of the world by different races. For example, the Malays made a torch by wrapping resinous gum in palm leaves, thus devising a crude candle with the wick on the outside.
Somewhat similar to the wood splinter and a precursor to the candle was the rushlight. In observing that burning wood with resinous or fatty material increased its flammability and significantly boosted the light produced, it made sense to try to replicate this artificially. As a result, rushes were cut and soaked in water. They were then peeled, leaving lengths of pith partially held together by threads of the skin that weren't removed. These pith sticks were placed in the sun to bleach and dry, and once thoroughly dry, they were dipped in hot grease, which was saved from cooking or obtained for this purpose. A reed two or three feet long held in a splinter holder would burn for about an hour. This shows that humanity was starting to make advancements in artificial lighting. By developing the rushlight, they were laying the groundwork for the invention of the candle. Pliny mentioned the burning of oil-soaked reeds as part of funeral rituals. Many simple precursors to the candle were created in different regions by various cultures. For instance, the Malays made a torch by wrapping resinous gum in palm leaves, effectively creating a basic candle with the wick on the outside.
Many primitive uses of vegetable and animal fats were forerunners of the oil-lamp. In the East Indies the candleberry, which contains oily seeds, has been burned for light by the natives. In many cases burning fish and birds have served as lamps. In the Orkney Islands the carcass of a stormy petrel with a wick in its mouth has been utilized as a light-source, and in Alaska a fish in a split stick has provided a crude torch for the natives. These primitive methods of obtaining artificial light have been employed for centuries and many are in use at the present time among uncivilized tribes and even by civilized beings in the remote outskirts of civilization. Surely progress is limited where a burning fish serves as a torch, or where, at best, the light-sources are feeble, smoking, flickering, and ill-smelling!
Many basic uses of plant and animal fats were early forms of the oil lamp. In the East Indies, the candleberry, which has oily seeds, has been used for light by the locals. In many instances, burning fish and birds have acted as lamps. In the Orkney Islands, the body of a stormy petrel with a wick in its mouth has been used as a light source, and in Alaska, a fish in a split stick has provided a simple torch for the locals. These basic methods of getting artificial light have been used for centuries and many are still in use today among uncivilized tribes and even by civilized people in the far reaches of civilization. Clearly, progress is limited when a burning fish is a torch, or when, at best, the light sources are weak, smoky, flickering, and smelly!
Progress insisted upon a light-source which was free from the defects of the crude devices already described and the next developments were improvements to the extent at least that combustion was more thorough. The early oil-lamps and candles did not emit much smoke, but they were still feeble light-sources and not always without noticeable odors. Nevertheless, they marked a tremendous advance in the production of artificial light. Although they were not scientific developments in the modern sense, the early oil-lamp and the candle represented the great possibilities of utilizing knowledge rather than depending upon the raw products of nature in unmodified forms. The advent of these two light-sources in reality marked the beginning of the civilization which was destined to progress and survive.
Progress demanded a light source that was free from the flaws of the basic devices previously mentioned, and the next advancements improved combustion efficiency. The early oil lamps and candles didn’t produce much smoke, but they were still weak light sources and often had noticeable scents. However, they represented a significant leap forward in creating artificial light. While they weren’t scientific innovations in the modern sense, the early oil lamp and candle showed the vast potential of using knowledge instead of solely relying on unmodified natural resources. The introduction of these two light sources truly marked the start of a civilization that was set to evolve and thrive.
Although such primitive light-sources as the flaming splinter and the glowing ember have survived until the present age, lamps consisting of a wick dipped into a receptacle containing animal and vegetable oils have been in use among the more advanced peoples since prehistoric times. Oil-lamps are to be seen in the earliest Roman illustrations. During the height of ancient civilization along the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, elaborate lighting was effected by means of the shallow grease-or oil-lamp. It is difficult to estimate the age in which this form of light-source originated, but some lamps in existence in collections at the present time appear to have been made as early as four or five thousand years before the Christian era. It is noteworthy that such lamps did not differ materially in essential details from those in use as late as a few centuries ago.
Although primitive light sources like burning splinters and glowing embers are still around today, more advanced societies have been using lamps made with wicks soaked in animal and plant oils since prehistoric times. Oil lamps can be seen in some of the earliest Roman art. During the peak of ancient civilization along the eastern Mediterranean, sophisticated lighting was achieved with shallow grease or oil lamps. It's hard to pinpoint when this type of light source first appeared, but some lamps that exist in collections today seem to date back four or five thousand years before Christ. It's interesting to note that these lamps didn't significantly differ in key features from those used just a few centuries ago.
At first the grease used was the crude fat from animals. Vegetable oils also were burned in the early lamps. The Japanese, for example, extracted oil from nuts. When the demands of civilization increased, extensive efforts were made to obtain the required fats and oils. Amphibious animals of the North and the huge mammals of the sea were slaughtered for their fat, and vegetable sources were cultivated. Later, sperm and colza were the most common oils used by the advanced races. The former is an animal oil obtained from the head cavities of the sperm-whale; the latter is a vegetable oil obtained from rape-seed. Mineral oil was introduced as an illuminant in 1853, and the modern lamp came into use.
At first, the grease used was the basic fat from animals. Vegetable oils were also used in the early lamps. For example, the Japanese extracted oil from nuts. As civilization's needs grew, significant efforts were made to acquire the necessary fats and oils. Amphibious animals from the North and massive sea mammals were hunted for their fat, and plant sources were developed. Eventually, sperm oil and colza oil became the most common oils used by advanced societies. The former is an animal oil sourced from the head cavities of the sperm whale, while the latter is a plant oil derived from rapeseed. Mineral oil was introduced as a light source in 1853, leading to the use of the modern lamp.
The grease-and oil-lamps in general were of such a form that they could be carried with ease and they had flat bottoms so that they would rest securely. The simplest forms had a single wick, but in others many wicks dipped into the same receptacle. The early ones were of stone, but later, lamps were modeled from clay or terra cotta and finally from metals. They were usually covered and the wick projected through a hole in the top near the edge. Large stone vases filled with a hundred pounds of liquid fat are known to have been used in early times. As a part of the setting in the celebration of festivals the ancient nations of Asia and Africa placed along the streets bronze vases filled with liquid fat. The Esquimaux to-day use this form of lamp, in which whale-oil and seal blubber is the fuel. Incidentally, these lamps also supply the only artificial heat for their huts and igloos. The heat from these feeble light-sources and from their bodies keeps these natives of the arctics warm within the icy walls of their abodes.
The grease and oil lamps were designed to be easily portable, with flat bottoms for stability. The simplest types had a single wick, while others had multiple wicks dipping into the same container. The earliest were made of stone, but later lamps were crafted from clay or terra cotta, and eventually from metals. They typically had covers, with the wick sticking out through a hole near the edge at the top. Large stone vases containing a hundred pounds of liquid fat were commonly used in ancient times. During festival celebrations, ancient cultures in Asia and Africa placed bronze vases filled with liquid fat along the streets. Today, the Eskimos use similar lamps that burn whale oil and seal blubber. These lamps also provide the only artificial heat for their huts and igloos. The minimal heat from these faint light sources and their bodies keeps these Arctic natives warm within the icy confines of their homes.
Very beautiful oil-lamps of brass, bronze, and pewter evolved in such countries as Egypt. Many of these were designed for and used in religious ceremonies. The oil-lamps of China, Scotland, and other countries in later centuries were improved by the addition of a pan beneath the oil-receptacle, to catch drippings from the wick or oil which might run over during the filling. The Chinese lamps were sometimes made of bamboo, but the Scottish lamps were made of metal. A flat metal lamp, called a crusie, was one of the chief products of blacksmiths and was common in Scotland until the middle of the nineteenth century. This type of lamp was used by many nations and has been found in the catacombs of Rome. The crusie was usually suspended by an iron hook and the flow of oil to the wick could be regulated by tilting. The wick in the Scottish lamps consisted of the pith of rushes, cloth, or twisted threads. These early oil-lamps were almost always shallow vessels into which a short wick was dipped, and it was not until the latter part of the eighteenth century that other forms came into general use. The change in form was due chiefly to the introduction of scientific knowledge when mineral oil was introduced. As early as 1781 the burning of naptha obtained by distilling coal at low temperatures was first discussed, but no general applications were made until a later period. This was the beginning of many marked improvements in oil-lamps, and was in reality the birth of the modern science of light-production.
Very beautiful oil lamps made of brass, bronze, and pewter developed in countries like Egypt. Many of these were designed for and used in religious ceremonies. The oil lamps from China, Scotland, and other regions in later centuries were enhanced by adding a pan underneath the oil reservoir to catch drips from the wick or oil that might spill during filling. Chinese lamps were sometimes made of bamboo, while Scottish lamps were made of metal. A flat metal lamp known as a crusie was one of the main products of blacksmiths and was common in Scotland until the middle of the nineteenth century. This type of lamp was used by many nations and has been found in the catacombs of Rome. The crusie was usually hung by an iron hook, and the oil flow to the wick could be adjusted by tilting. The wick in the Scottish lamps was made from rush pith, cloth, or twisted threads. These early oil lamps were almost always shallow containers with a short wick inserted, and it wasn't until the late eighteenth century that other designs became widely used. This change in design was mainly due to the introduction of scientific knowledge when mineral oil came into play. As early as 1781, the idea of burning naphtha obtained by distilling coal at low temperatures was first discussed, but widespread applications didn't happen until later. This marked the beginning of many significant advancements in oil lamps and was essentially the start of modern light production science.
As the activities of man became more complex he met from his growing store of knowledge the increasing requirements of lighting. In consequence, many ingenious devices for lighting were evolved. For example, in England in the seventeenth century man was already burrowing into the earth for coal and of course encountered coal-gases. These inflammable gases were first known for the direful effects which they so often produced rather than for their useful qualities. Although they were known to miners long before they received scientific attention, the earliest account of them in the Transactions of the Royal Society was presented in the year 1667. A description of early gas-lighting has been reserved for a later chapter, but the foregoing is noted at this point to introduce a novel early method of lighting in coal-mines where inflammable gases were encountered. In discussing this coal-gas another early writer stated that "it will not take fire except by flame" and that "sparks do not affect it." One of the early solutions of the problem of artificial lighting under such conditions is summarized as follows:
As people’s activities became more complex, they had to meet the growing demands for lighting with their expanding knowledge. As a result, many clever lighting devices were developed. For instance, in England during the seventeenth century, people were already digging into the earth for coal and came across coal gases. These flammable gases were primarily recognized for the dangerous effects they frequently caused rather than for their potential usefulness. Although miners were aware of them long before they drew scientific interest, the earliest documented account in the Transactions of the Royal Society was published in 1667. A detailed description of early gas lighting will be covered in a later chapter, but it’s important to mention here as an introduction to an innovative early lighting method used in coal mines where flammable gases were found. In discussing this coal gas, another early writer noted that "it will not ignite except by flame" and that "sparks do not affect it." One of the early solutions to the issue of artificial lighting in such situations can be summarized as follows:
Before the invention of Sir Humphrey Davy's Safety Lamp, this property of the gas gave rise to a variety of contrivances for affording the miners sufficient light to pursue their operations; and one of the most useful of these inventions was a mill for producing light by sparks elicited by the collision of flint and steel.
Before Sir Humphrey Davy invented the Safety Lamp, the gas's properties led to various devices that gave miners enough light to work. One of the most practical of these inventions was a mill that generated light through sparks created by striking flint and steel.
Such a stream of sparks may appear a very crude and unsatisfactory solution as judged by present standards, but it was at least an ingenious application of the facilities available at that time. Various other devices were resorted to in the coal-mines before the introduction of a safety lamp.
Such a flow of sparks might seem like a really basic and inadequate solution by today’s standards, but it was at least a clever use of the tools available back then. Many other devices were used in coal mines before the safety lamp was introduced.
In discussing the candle it is necessary again to go back to an early period, for it slowly evolved in the course of many centuries. It is the natural descendant of the rushlight, the grease-lamp, and various primitive devices. Until the advent of the more scientific age of artificial lighting, the candle stood preëminent among early light-sources. It did not emit appreciable smoke or odor and it was conveniently portable and less fragile than the oil-lamp. Candles have been used throughout the Christian era and some authorities are inclined to attribute their origin to the Phœnicians. It is known that the Romans used them, especially the wax-candles, in religious ceremonies. The Phœnicians introduced them into Byzantium, but they disappeared under the Turkish rule and did not come into use again until the twelfth century.
In discussing the candle, we need to return to an earlier period, as it gradually developed over many centuries. It is the natural successor to the rushlight, the grease lamp, and various basic devices. Before the more scientific era of artificial lighting, the candle was the primary source of light. It produced minimal smoke or odor, and it was portable and less fragile than oil lamps. Candles have been used throughout the Christian era, and some experts believe their origin can be traced back to the Phoenicians. It's known that the Romans used them, especially wax candles, in religious ceremonies. The Phoenicians brought them to Byzantium, but they vanished under Turkish rule and didn’t reappear until the twelfth century.
The wax-candle was very much more expensive than the tallow-candle until the fifteenth century, when its relative cost was somewhat reduced, bringing it within the means of a greater proportion of the people. Nevertheless it has long been used, chiefly by the wealthy; the departing guest of the early Victorian inn would be likely to find an item on his bill such as this: "For a gentleman who called himself a gentleman, wax-lights, 5/." Poor men used tallow dips or went to bed in the dark. It is interesting to note the importance of the candle in the household budget of early times in various sayings. For example, "The game is not worth the candle," implies that the cost of candle-light was not ignored. In these days little attention is given to the cost of artificial light under similar conditions. If a person "burns a candle at both ends" he is wasteful and oblivious to the consequences of extravagance whether in material goods or in human energy.
The wax candle was much more expensive than the tallow candle until the fifteenth century when its cost dropped a bit, making it affordable for more people. Still, it was mainly used by the wealthy; a departing guest at an early Victorian inn might see a charge on their bill like this: "For a gentleman who called himself a gentleman, wax-lights, 5/." Poorer individuals used tallow dips or went to bed in darkness. It's interesting to note how significant the candle was in early household budgets, reflected in various sayings. For example, "The game is not worth the candle" suggests that the cost of candlelight was taken seriously. Nowadays, we rarely consider the expense of artificial light in similar situations. If someone "burns a candle at both ends," it means they are wasteful and unaware of the consequences of their extravagance, whether regarding material goods or personal energy.
With the rise of the Christian church, candles came to be used in religious ceremonies and many of the symbolisms, meanings, and customs survive to the present time. Some of the finest art of past centuries is found in the old candlesticks. Many of these antiques, which ofttimes were gifts to the church, have been preserved to posterity by the church. The influence of these lighting accessories is often noted in modern lighting-fixtures, but unfortunately early art often suffers from adaptation to the requirements of modern light-sources, or the eyesight suffers from a senseless devotion to art which results in the use of modern light-sources, unshaded and glaring, in places where it was unnecessary to shade the feeble candle.
With the rise of the Christian church, candles began to be used in religious ceremonies, and many of the symbolisms, meanings, and customs continue to this day. Some of the finest art from past centuries can be found in the old candlesticks. Many of these antiques, which were often gifts to the church, have been preserved for future generations by the church. The influence of these lighting accessories is frequently seen in modern light fixtures, but unfortunately, early art often gets altered to fit the needs of contemporary light sources, or people compromise their vision by clinging to art that uses harsh, unshaded modern light sources in situations where it wasn’t necessary to shade the weak candlelight.
The oldest materials employed for making candles are beeswax and tallow. The beeswax was bleached before use. The tallow was melted and strained and then cotton or flax fibers were dipped into it repeatedly, until the desired thickness was obtained. In early centuries the pith of rushes was used for wicks. Tallow is now used only as a source of stearine. Spermaceti, a fatty substance obtained from the sperm-whale, was introduced into candle-making in about 1750 and great numbers of men searched the sea to fill the growing demands. Paraffin wax, a mixture of solid hydrocarbons obtained from petroleum, came into use in 1854 and stearine is now used with it. The latter increases the rigidity and decreases the brittleness of the candle. Some of the modern candles are made of a mixture of stearine and the hard fat extracted from cocoanut-oil. Modern candles vary in composition, but all are the product of much experience and of the application of scientific knowledge. The wicks are now made chiefly of cotton yarn, braided or plaited by machinery and chemically treated to aid in complete combustion when the candle is burned. Their structure is the result of long experience and they are now made so that they bend and dip into the molten fuel and are wholly consumed. This eliminates the necessity of trimming.
The oldest materials used for making candles are beeswax and tallow. The beeswax was bleached before use. The tallow was melted and strained, and then cotton or flax fibers were repeatedly dipped into it until the desired thickness was achieved. In earlier centuries, the pith of rushes was used for wicks. Tallow is now only used as a source of stearine. Spermaceti, a fatty substance obtained from the sperm whale, was introduced into candle-making around 1750, leading many men to search the sea to meet the increasing demand. Paraffin wax, a mixture of solid hydrocarbons derived from petroleum, was introduced in 1854, and stearine is now added to it. The latter enhances the rigidity and reduces the brittleness of the candle. Some modern candles are made from a mix of stearine and the hard fat extracted from coconut oil. Contemporary candles vary in composition, but all result from extensive experience and the application of scientific knowledge. The wicks are now primarily made of cotton yarn, braided or plaited by machinery and chemically treated to ensure complete combustion when the candle is burned. Their design is a result of long experience, and they are now made to bend and dip into the molten fuel, ensuring they are completely consumed. This eliminates the need for trimming.
Candles have been made in various ways, including dipping, pouring, drawing, and molding. Wax-candles are made by pouring, because wax cannot be molded satisfactorily. Drawing is somewhat similar to dipping, except that the process is more or less continuous and is carried out by machinery. Molding, as the term implies, involves the use of molds, of the size and shape desired.
Candles have been made in different ways, including dipping, pouring, drawing, and molding. Wax candles are created by pouring since wax can’t be molded effectively. Drawing is a bit like dipping, but the process is continuous and done by machines. Molding, as the name suggests, uses molds in the size and shape that are wanted.
The candlestick evolved from the most primitive wooden objects to elaborately designed and decorated works of art. The primitive candlestick was crude and was no more than a holder of some kind for keeping the candle upright. Later a form of cup was attached to the stem of the holder, to catch the dripping wax or fat. The latter improvement has persisted throughout the centuries. The modern candle is by no means an unsatisfactory light-source. Those who have had experience with it in the outskirts of civilization will testify that it possesses several desirable characteristics. Supplies of candles are transported without difficulty; the lighted candle is easily carried about; and the light in a quiescent atmosphere is quite satisfactory, if common sense is used in shading and placing the candle. Although in a sense a primitive light-source, it is a blessing in many cases and, incidentally, it is extensively used to-day in industries, in religious ceremonies, as a decorative element at banquets, and in the outposts of civilization.
The candlestick has evolved from basic wooden designs to beautifully crafted works of art. The early candlestick was simple, serving mainly as a holder to keep the candle upright. Eventually, a cup-like feature was added to the holder's stem to catch dripping wax or fat. This improvement has remained through the years. The modern candle is by no means a poor light source. Those who have used it in remote areas will confirm that it has several appealing traits. Candles are easy to transport; a lit candle can be moved around with ease; and in a calm atmosphere, the light it provides is quite adequate when common sense is applied to its placement and shading. While it may be considered a basic light source, it serves as a blessing in many scenarios and is widely used today in industries, religious ceremonies, as a decorative element at banquets, and in remote areas.
This account of the evolution of light-sources has crossed the threshold of what may be termed modern scientific light-production in the case of the candle and the oil-lamp. There is a period of a century or more during which scientific progress was slow, but those years paved the way for the extraordinary developments of the last few decades.
This overview of how light sources have developed has moved into what we can call modern scientific light production with the candle and the oil lamp. There was a period of over a century when scientific advancement was slow, but those years set the stage for the amazing progress of the past few decades.
IV
THE CEREMONIAL USE OF LIGHT
Inasmuch as the symbolisms and ceremonial uses of light originated in the childhood of the human race and were nourished throughout the age of mythology, the early light-sources are associated more with this phase of artificial light than modern ones. For this reason it appears appropriate to present this discussion before entering into the later stages of the development and utilization of artificial light. Furthermore, many of the traditions of lighting at the present time are survivors of the early ages. Lighting-fixtures show the influence of this byway of lighting, and in those cases where the ceremonial use of light has survived to the present time, modern light-sources cannot be employed wisely in replacing more primitive ones without consideration of the origin and existence of the customs. In fact, candles are likely to be used for hundreds of years to come, owing to the sentiment connected with them and to the established customs founded upon centuries of traditional use.
Since the symbolism and ceremonial uses of light began in the early days of humanity and were nurtured during the age of mythology, the initial sources of artificial light are more linked to this period than to modern times. Therefore, it seems fitting to discuss this before exploring the later development and use of artificial light. Additionally, many current lighting traditions are remnants from ancient times. Lighting fixtures reflect this historical way of illuminating spaces, and in cases where ceremonial uses of light still exist today, contemporary light sources cannot be wisely used to replace more primitive ones without understanding the origins and continuance of these customs. In fact, candles are likely to be used for hundreds of years to come because of the sentiment attached to them and the established customs based on centuries of traditional use.
Doubtless, the sun as a source of heat and light and of the blessings which these bring to earth, is responsible largely for the divine significance bestowed upon light. Darkness very deservingly acquired many uncomplimentary attributes, for danger lurked behind its veil and it was the suitable abode of evil spirits. It harbored all that was the antithesis of goodness, happiness, and security. Light naturally became sacred, life-giving, and symbolic of divine presence. Fire was to primitive beings the most impressive phenomenon over which they had any control, and it was sufficiently mysterious in its operation to warrant a connection with the supernatural. Thus it was very natural that these earlier beings worshiped it as representing divine presence. The sun, as Ra, was one of the chief gods of the ancient Egyptians; and the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the ancient Greeks, and many other early peoples gave a high place to this deity. Among simpler races the sun was often the sole object of worship, and those peoples who worship Light as the god of all, in a sense are not far afield. Fire-worshipers generally considered fire as the purest representation of heavenly fire, the origin of everything that lives.
Undoubtedly, the sun, as a source of heat and light and the blessings these bring to Earth, plays a major role in the divine significance associated with light. Darkness justly earned many negative traits, as danger hid behind its cover and it was seen as a suitable home for evil spirits. It contained everything that opposed goodness, happiness, and safety. Light naturally became sacred, life-giving, and symbolic of divine presence. For early humans, fire was the most impressive phenomenon they could control, and its mysterious nature was enough to link it to the supernatural. So, it was only natural that these early people worshiped fire as a symbol of divine presence. The sun, known as Ra, was one of the main gods of ancient Egyptians; and the Assyrians, Babylonians, ancient Greeks, and many other early cultures held this deity in high regard. Among simpler tribes, the sun was often the only object of worship, and those who see Light as the god of all are not far off. Fire-worshipers typically viewed fire as the purest representation of heavenly fire, the source of all life.
Light was considered such a blessing that lamps were buried with the dead in order that spirits should be able to have it in the next world. This custom has prevailed widely but the fact that the lamps were unlighted indicates that only the material aspect was considered. It is interesting to note that the lamps and other light-sources in pagan temples and religious processions were not symbolical but were offerings to the gods. In later centuries a deeper symbolical meaning became attached to light and burning lamps were placed upon the tombs of important personages. The burying of lamps with the dead appears to have originated in Asia. The Phœnicians and Romans apparently continued the custom, but no traces of it have been found in Greece and Egypt.
Light was seen as such a blessing that lamps were buried with the dead so that spirits could have it in the afterlife. This practice became widespread, but the fact that the lamps were not lit shows that only the physical aspect was considered. It's interesting to point out that the lamps and other sources of light in pagan temples and religious processions weren't symbolic but were offerings to the gods. In later centuries, a deeper symbolic meaning was attached to light, and burning lamps were placed on the tombs of notable figures. The practice of burying lamps with the dead seems to have started in Asia. The Phoenicians and Romans apparently continued this custom, but there are no signs of it in Greece and Egypt.
Fire and light have been closely associated in various religious creeds and their ceremonies. The Hindu festival in honor of the goddess of prosperity is attended by the burning of many lamps in the temples and homes. The Jewish synagogues have their eternal lamps and in their rituals fire and light have played prominent rôles. The devout Brahman maintains a fire on the hearth and worships it as omniscient and divine. He expects a brand from this to be used to light his funeral pyre, whose fire and light will make his spirit fit to enter his heavenly abode. He keeps a fire burning on the altar, worships Agni, the god of fire, and makes fire sacrifices on various occasions such as betrothals and marriages. To the Mohammedans lighted lamps symbolize holy places, and the Kaaba at Mecca, which contains a black stone supposed to have been brought from heaven, is illuminated by thousands of lamps. Many of the uses to which light was put in ancient times indicate its rarity and sacred nature. Doubtless, the increasing use of artificial light at festivals and celebrations of the present time is partly the result of lingering customs of bygone centuries and partly due to a recognition of an innate appeal or attribute of light. Certainly nothing is more generally appropriate in representing joy and prosperity.
Fire and light have been closely linked in various religious beliefs and their ceremonies. The Hindu festival honoring the goddess of prosperity features many lamps being lit in temples and homes. Jewish synagogues have their eternal lamps, and fire and light have always been significant in their rituals. The devoted Brahman maintains a fire on the hearth and worships it as all-knowing and divine. He expects a spark from this fire to be used to ignite his funeral pyre, with its flames allowing his spirit to ascend to his heavenly home. He keeps a fire burning on the altar, worships Agni, the god of fire, and makes fire sacrifices during various occasions like engagements and weddings. For Muslims, lit lamps symbolize sacred places, and the Kaaba in Mecca, which holds a black stone believed to have come from heaven, is illuminated by thousands of lamps. Many of the ways light was used in ancient times reflect its rarity and sacred nature. Undoubtedly, the growing use of artificial light at modern festivals and celebrations is partly a result of lingering customs from the past and partly due to a recognition of light's intrinsic appeal or quality. Nothing represents joy and prosperity better.
Throughout all countries ancient races had woven natural light and fire into their rites and customs, so it became a natural step to utilize artificial light and fire in the same manner. It would be tedious and monotonous to survey the vast field of ancient worship of light, for the underlying ideas are generally similar. The mythology of the Greeks is illustrative of the importance attached to fire and light by the cultivated peoples of ancient times. The myth of Prometheus emphasizes the fact that in those remote periods fire and light were regarded as of prime importance. According to this myth, fire and light were contained in heaven and great cunning and daring were necessary in order to obtain it. Prometheus stole this heavenly fire, for which act he was chained to the mountain and made to suffer. The Greeks mark this event as the beginning of human civilization. All arts are traced to Prometheus, and all earthly woe likewise. As past history is surveyed it appears natural to think of scientific men who have become martyrs to the quest of hidden secrets. They have made great sacrifices for the future benefit of civilization and not a few of them have endured persecution even in recent times. The Greeks recognized that a new era began with the acquisition of artificial light. Its divine nature was recognized and it became a phenomenon for worship and a means for representing divine presence. The origin of fire and light made them holy. The fire on the altar took its place in religious rites and there evolved many ceremonial uses of lamps, candles, and fire.
Across all ancient cultures, natural light and fire were incorporated into their rituals and traditions, making it a natural progression to use artificial light and fire in the same way. It would be tiresome and repetitive to explore the extensive practices of ancient light worship, as the core concepts are generally similar. Greek mythology highlights the significance that ancient civilizations placed on fire and light. The myth of Prometheus underscores that, in those distant times, fire and light were seen as extremely important. In this myth, fire and light were kept in the heavens, and considerable ingenuity and bravery were needed to obtain them. Prometheus stole this celestial fire, for which he was bound to a mountain and made to suffer. The Greeks regarded this event as the start of human civilization. All arts are said to trace back to Prometheus, along with all earthly suffering. As we look back at history, it seems natural to consider scientists who have become martyrs in their pursuit of hidden knowledge. They have made significant sacrifices for the future benefit of civilization, and many have faced persecution even in recent times. The Greeks acknowledged that a new era began with the advent of artificial light. Its divine quality was recognized, and it became an object of worship and a way to symbolize divine presence. The origins of fire and light sanctified them. The fire on the altar occupied a central role in religious ceremonies, leading to various ceremonial uses of lamps, candles, and fire.
The Greeks and Romans burned sacred lamps in the temples and utilized light and fire in many ceremonies. The torch-race, in which young men ran with lighted torches, the winner being the one who reached the goal first with his torch still alight, originated in a Grecian ceremony of lighting the sacred fire. There are many references in ancient Roman and Grecian literature to sacred lamps burning day and night in sanctuaries and before statues of gods and heroes. On birthdays and festivals the houses of the Romans were specially ornamented with burning lamps. The Vestal Virgins in Rome maintained the sacred fire which had been brought by fugitives from Troy. In ancient Rome when the fire in the Temple of Vesta became extinguished, it was rekindled by the rubbing of a piece of wood upon another until fire was obtained. This was carried into the temple by the Vestal Virgin and the sacred fire was rekindled. The fire produced in this manner, for some reason, was considered holy.
The Greeks and Romans used to light sacred lamps in temples and incorporated light and fire in many ceremonies. The torch race, where young men ran with lit torches and the winner was whoever reached the finish line first with their torch still burning, started as a Greek ritual for lighting the sacred fire. There are numerous mentions in ancient Roman and Greek literature about sacred lamps that burned continuously in sanctuaries and in front of statues of gods and heroes. During birthdays and festivals, Roman homes were especially decorated with burning lamps. The Vestal Virgins in Rome tended to the sacred fire that had been brought by survivors from Troy. In ancient Rome, if the fire in the Temple of Vesta went out, it was reignited by rubbing one piece of wood against another until fire was created. This was then taken into the temple by a Vestal Virgin to rekindle the sacred fire. The fire created in this way was regarded as holy for some reason.
The early peoples displayed many lamps on feast-days and an example of extravagance in this respect is an occasion when King Constantine commanded that the entire city of Constantinople be illuminated by wax-candles on Christmas Eve. Candelabra, of the form of the branching tree, were commonly in use in the Roman temples.
The early people showcased numerous lamps on festival days, and one extravagant example is when King Constantine ordered the entire city of Constantinople to be lit up with wax candles on Christmas Eve. Candelabras, shaped like branching trees, were widely used in Roman temples.
The ceremonial use of light in the Christian church evolved both from adaptations of pagan customs and of the natural symbolisms of fire and light. However, these acquired a deeper meaning in Christianity than in early times because they were primarily visible representations or manifestations of the divine presence. The Bible contains many references to the importance and symbolisms of light and fire. According to the First Book of Moses, the achievement of the Creator immediately following the creation of "the heavens and the earth" was the creation of light. The word "light" is the forty-sixth word in Genesis. Christ is "the true light" and Christians are "children of light" in war against the evil "powers of darkness." When St. Paul was converted "there shined about him a great light from heaven." The impressiveness and symbolism of fire and light are testified to in many biblical expressions. Christ stands "in the midst of seven candle-sticks" with "his eyes as a flame of fire." When the Holy Ghost appeared before the apostles "there appeared unto them cloven tongues of fire." When St. Paul was preaching the gospel of Christ at Alexandria "there were many lights" suggesting a festive illumination.
The ceremonial use of light in the Christian church evolved from adaptations of pagan customs and the natural symbolism of fire and light. However, these gained a deeper meaning in Christianity than in earlier times because they were primarily visible representations of the divine presence. The Bible has many references to the significance and symbolism of light and fire. According to the First Book of Moses, the Creator's first achievement after creating "the heavens and the earth" was creating light. The word "light" is the forty-sixth word in Genesis. Christ is "the true light," and Christians are "children of light" fighting against the evil "powers of darkness." When St. Paul was converted, "a great light from heaven shone around him." The impressiveness and symbolism of fire and light are seen in many biblical expressions. Christ stands "in the midst of seven candle-sticks" with "his eyes like a flame of fire." When the Holy Spirit appeared before the apostles, "there appeared unto them cloven tongues of fire." When St. Paul preached the gospel of Christ in Alexandria, "there were many lights," suggesting a festive illumination.
According to the Bible, the perpetual fire which came originally from heaven was to be kept burning on the altar. It was holy and those whose duty it was to keep it burning were guilty of a grave offense if they allowed it to be extinguished. If human hands were permitted to kindle it, punishment was meted out. The two sons of Aaron who "offered strange fire before the Lord" were devoured by "fire from the Lord." The seven-branched candlestick was lighted eternally and these burning light-sources were necessary accompaniments of worship.
According to the Bible, the everlasting fire that originally came from heaven was to be kept burning on the altar. It was sacred, and those responsible for maintaining it were committing a serious offense if they let it go out. If anyone was allowed to light it with their own hands, they faced punishment. The two sons of Aaron who "offered strange fire before the Lord" were consumed by "fire from the Lord." The seven-branched candlestick was to be lit continuously, and these flames were essential parts of worship.
The countless ceremonial uses of fire and light which had evolved in the past centuries were bound to influence the rites and customs of the Christian church. The festive illumination of pagan temples in honor of gods was carried over into the Christian era. The Christmas tree of to-day is incomplete without its many lights. Its illumination is a homage of light to the source of light. The celebration of Easter in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem is a typical example of fire-worship retained from ancient times. At the climax of the services comes the descent of the Holy Fire. The central candelabra suddenly becomes ablaze and the worshipers, each of whom carries a wax taper, light their candles therefrom and rush through the streets. The fire is considered to be of divine origin and is a symbol of resurrection. The custom is similar in meaning to the light which in older times was maintained before gods.
The countless ceremonial uses of fire and light that have developed over the centuries were sure to impact the rituals and traditions of the Christian church. The festive lighting of pagan temples to honor gods continued into the Christian era. Today's Christmas tree isn't complete without its many lights. Its illumination is a tribute to the source of light. The celebration of Easter at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem is a prime example of fire worship carried over from ancient times. At the peak of the services, the Holy Fire descends. The central candelabra suddenly ignites, and worshipers, each holding a wax taper, light their candles from it and rush through the streets. The fire is seen as having divine origins and symbolizes resurrection. This custom is similar in meaning to the light that was once kept burning before the gods.
During the first two or three centuries of the Christian era the ceremonial use of light does not appear to have been very extensive. Writings of the period contain statements which appear to ridicule this use to some extent. For example, one writer of the second century states that "On days of rejoicing ... we do not encroach upon daylight with lamps." Another, in the fourth century, refers with sarcasm to the "heathen practice" in this manner: "They kindle lights as though to one who is in darkness. Can he be thought sane who offers the light of lamps and candles to the Author and Giver of all light?"
During the first two or three centuries of the Christian era, the ceremonial use of light doesn’t seem to have been very common. Writings from that time include remarks that seem to mock this practice to some degree. For instance, a writer from the second century notes, "On days of celebration ... we do not use lamps during daylight." Another writer from the fourth century sarcastically comments on the "pagan practice" by saying, "They light candles as if for someone in darkness. Can anyone be seen as sane who offers the light of lamps and candles to the Creator and Giver of all light?"
That candles were lighted in cemeteries is evidenced by an edict which forbade their use during the day. Lamps of the early centuries of the Christian era have been found in the catacombs of Rome which are thought to have been ceremonial lamps, for they were not buried with the dead. They were found only in niches in the walls. During these same centuries elaborate candelabra containing hundreds of candles were kept burning before the tombs of saints. Notwithstanding the doubt that exists as to the extent of ceremonial lighting in the early centuries of the Christian era, it is certain that by the beginning of the fifth century the ceremonial use of light in the Christian church had become very extensive and firmly established. That this is true and that there were still some objections is indicated by many controversies. Some thought that lamps before tombs were ensigns of idolatry and others felt that no harm was done if religious people thus tried to honor martyrs and saints. Some early writings convey the idea that the ritualistic use of lights in the church arose from the retention of lights necessary at nocturnal services after the hours of worship had been changed to daytime.
That candles were used in cemeteries is shown by a rule that banned their use during the day. Lamps from the early years of the Christian era have been discovered in the catacombs of Rome, which are believed to have been ceremonial lamps because they were not buried with the deceased. They were only found in niches in the walls. During the same period, elaborate candelabra with hundreds of candles were kept lit before the tombs of saints. Despite the uncertainty about the extent of ceremonial lighting in those early years of Christianity, it’s clear that by the beginning of the fifth century, the ceremonial use of light in the Christian church had become very widespread and firmly established. This is supported by the existence of controversies, as some people believed that lamps in front of tombs were signs of idolatry, while others felt that it was harmless for religious individuals to honor martyrs and saints in this way. Some early writings suggest that the ritualistic use of lights in the church developed from the need for lights during nighttime services after the worship hours shifted to daytime.
Passing beyond the early controversial period, the ceremonial use of light is everywhere in evidence at ordinary church services. On special occasions such as funerals, baptisms, and marriages, elaborate altar-lighting was customary. The gorgeous candelabra and the eternal lamp are noted in many writings. Early in the fifth century the pope ordered that candles be blessed and provided rituals for this ceremony. Shortly after this the Feast of Purification of the Virgin was inaugurated and it became known as Candlemas because on this day the candles for the entire year were blessed. However, it appears that the blessing of candles was not carried out in all churches. Altar lights were not generally used until the thirteenth century. They were originally the seven candles carried by church officials and placed near the altar.
Passing beyond the early controversial period, the ceremonial use of light is everywhere in evidence at ordinary church services. On special occasions like funerals, baptisms, and weddings, elaborate altar lighting was common. The beautiful candelabra and the eternal lamp are mentioned in many writings. Early in the fifth century, the pope ordered that candles be blessed and provided rituals for this ceremony. Shortly after this, the Feast of the Purification of the Virgin was established and became known as Candlemas because on this day the candles for the entire year were blessed. However, it seems that the blessing of candles was not performed in all churches. Altar lights were not widely used until the thirteenth century. They were originally the seven candles carried by church officials and placed near the altar.
The custom of placing lighted lamps before the tombs of martyrs was gradually extended to the placing of such lamps before various objects of a sacred or divine relation. Finally certain light-sources themselves became objects of worship and were surrounded by other lamps, and the symbolisms of light grew apace. A bishop in the sixth century heralded the triple offering to God represented by the burning wax-candle. He pointed out that the rush-wick developed from pure water; that the wax was the product of virgin bees; and that the flame was sent from heaven. Each of these, he was certain, was an offering acceptable to God. Wax-candles became associated chiefly with religious ceremonies. The wax later became symbolic of the Blessed Virgin and of the body of Christ. The wick was symbolical of Christ's soul, the flame represented his divine character, and the burning candle thus became symbolical of his death. The lamp, lantern, and taper are frequently symbols of piety, heavenly wisdom, or spiritual light. Fire and flames are emblems of zeal and fervor or of the sufferings of martyrdom and the flaming heart symbolizes fervent piety and spiritual or divine love.
The practice of placing lit lamps in front of the tombs of martyrs gradually expanded to include various sacred or divine objects. Eventually, certain light sources themselves became objects of worship, surrounded by additional lamps, and the significance of light grew rapidly. A bishop in the sixth century emphasized the triple offering to God represented by the burning wax candle. He noted that the rush wick came from pure water, the wax was produced by virgin bees, and the flame was from heaven. He believed that each of these was an offering pleasing to God. Wax candles became primarily linked with religious ceremonies. The wax later symbolized the Blessed Virgin and the body of Christ. The wick represented Christ's soul, the flame denoted his divine nature, and the burning candle thus came to symbolize his death. The lamp, lantern, and taper are often symbols of piety, heavenly wisdom, or spiritual light. Fire and flames represent zeal and fervor or the sufferings of martyrdom, while the flaming heart symbolizes passionate piety and spiritual or divine love.
By the time the Middle Ages were reached the ceremonial uses of light became very complex, but for the Roman Catholic Church they may be divided into three general groups: (1) They were symbolical of God's presence or of the effect of his presence; of Christ or of "the children of light"; or of joy and content at festivals. (2) They may be offered in fulfillment of a religious vow; that is, as an act of worship. (3) They may possess certain divine power because of their being blessed by the church, and therefore may be helpful to soul and body. The three conceptions are indicated in the prayers offered at the blessing of the candles on Candlemas as follows: (1) "O holy Lord ... who ... by thy command didst cause this liquid to come by the labor of bees to the perfection of wax, ... we beseech thee ... to bless and sanctify these candles for the use of men, and the health of bodies and souls...." (2) "...these candles, which we thy servants desire to carry lighted to magnify thy name; that by offering them to thee, being worthily inflamed with the holy fire of thy most sweet charity, we may deserve...." (3) "O Lord Jesus Christ, the true light, ... mercifully grant, that as these lights enkindled with visible fire dispel nocturnal darkness, so our hearts illuminated by visible fire," etc.
By the time the Middle Ages arrived, the ceremonial uses of light had become quite intricate. For the Roman Catholic Church, these uses can be grouped into three main categories: (1) They symbolize God's presence, the effects of His presence, Christ, or "the children of light," and they express joy and contentment during festivals. (2) They may be offered as a fulfillment of a religious vow, serving as an act of worship. (3) They may have certain divine power because they are blessed by the church, making them beneficial for both soul and body. These three ideas are reflected in the prayers said during the blessing of the candles on Candlemas as follows: (1) "O holy Lord ... who ... by your command caused this liquid to be transformed by the labor of bees into wax, ... we ask you ... to bless and sanctify these candles for the use of people and for the health of their bodies and souls...." (2) "...these candles, which we your servants wish to carry lit to magnify your name; that by offering them to you, being worthy ignited with the holy fire of your most sweet charity, we may deserve...." (3) "O Lord Jesus Christ, the true light, ... kindly grant that as these lights kindled with visible fire dispel the darkness of the night, so our hearts illuminated by visible fire," etc.
In general, the ceremonial uses of lights in this church were originated as a forceful representation of Christ and of salvation. On the eve of Easter a new fire, emblematic of the arisen Christ, is kindled, and all candles throughout the year are lighted from this. During the service of Holy Week thirteen lighted candles are placed before the altar and as the penitential songs are sung they are extinguished one by one. When but one remains burning it is carried behind the altar, thus symbolizing the last days of Christ on earth. It is said that this ceremony has been traced to the eighth century. On Easter Eve, after the new fire is lighted and blessed, certain ceremonies of light symbolize the resurrection of Christ. From this new fire three candles are lighted and from these the Paschal Candle. The origin of the latter is uncertain, but it symbolizes a victorious Christ. From it all the ceremonial lights of the church are lighted and they thereby are emblematic of the presence of the light of Christ.
In general, the ceremonial use of lights in this church started as a strong representation of Christ and salvation. On Easter Eve, a new fire, symbolizing the risen Christ, is lit, and all the candles throughout the year are lit from this fire. During Holy Week services, thirteen lit candles are placed in front of the altar, and as the penitential songs are sung, they are extinguished one by one. When only one candle remains lit, it is taken behind the altar, symbolizing the last days of Christ on earth. This ceremony is believed to date back to the eighth century. On Easter Eve, after the new fire is lit and blessed, certain light ceremonies symbolize the resurrection of Christ. From this new fire, three candles are lit, and from these, the Paschal Candle is created. The origin of the Paschal Candle is unclear, but it represents a victorious Christ. All the ceremonial lights of the church are lit from it, symbolizing the presence of the light of Christ.
Many interesting ceremonial uses may be traced out, but space permits a glimpse of only a few. At baptismal services the paschal candle is dipped into the water so that the latter will be effective as a regenerative element. The baptized child is reborn as a child of light. Lighted candles are placed in the hands of the baptized persons or of their god-parents. Those about to take vows carry lights before the church official and the same idea is attached to the custom of carrying or of holding lights on other occasions such as weddings and first communion. Lights are placed around the bodies of the dead and are carried at the funeral. They not only protect the dead from the powers of darkness but they symbolize the dead as still living in the light of Christ. The use of lighted candles around bodies of the dead still survives to some extent among Protestants, but their significance has been lost sight of. Even in the eighteenth century funerals in England were accompanied by lighted tapers, but the carrying of lights in other processions appears to have ceased with the Reformation. In some parts of Scotland it is still the custom to place two lighted candles on a table beside a corpse on the day of the funeral.
Many interesting ceremonial uses can be identified, but space allows for only a brief overview. During baptism services, the paschal candle is dipped into the water to make it effective as a regenerative element. The baptized child is reborn as a child of light. Lighted candles are placed in the hands of the baptized individuals or their godparents. Those preparing to take vows carry lights in front of the church official, and the same idea applies to the custom of carrying or holding lights during other occasions like weddings and first communions. Lights are placed around the bodies of the deceased and are carried at funerals. They not only protect the deceased from the powers of darkness but also symbolize that the deceased continue to live in the light of Christ. The tradition of using lighted candles around the deceased still exists to some degree among Protestants, though their meaning has been largely forgotten. Even in the eighteenth century, funerals in England featured lighted candles, but the practice of carrying lights in other processions seems to have ended with the Reformation. In some areas of Scotland, it is still customary to place two lighted candles on a table next to a corpse on the day of the funeral.
With the importance of light in the ritual of the church it is not surprising that the extinction of lights is a part of the ceremony of excommunication. Such a ceremony is described in an early writing thus: "Twelve priests should stand about the bishop, holding in their hands lighted torches, which at the conclusion of the anathema or excommunication they should cast down and trample under foot." When the excommunicant is reinstated, a lighted candle is placed in his hands as a symbol of reconciliation. These and many other ceremonial uses of light have been and are practised, but they are not always mandatory. Furthermore, the customs have varied from time to time, but the few which have been touched upon illustrate the impressive part that light has played in religious services.
With the significance of light in church rituals, it's not surprising that extinguishing lights is part of the excommunication ceremony. An early text describes this ceremony as follows: "Twelve priests should stand around the bishop, holding lit torches, which at the end of the anathema or excommunication they should throw down and trample underfoot." When someone is reinstated after being excommunicated, a lit candle is placed in their hands as a sign of reconciliation. These and many other ceremonial uses of light have been practiced and continue to be, but they aren't always required. Additionally, customs have changed over time, yet the few mentioned highlight the significant role that light has played in religious services.
During the Reformation the ceremonial use of lights was greatly altered and was abolished in the Protestant churches as a relic of superstition and papal authority. In the Lutheran churches ceremonial lights were largely retained, in the Church of England they have been subjected to many changes largely through the edicts of the rulers. In the latter church many controversies were waged over ceremonial lights and their use has been among the indictments of a number of officials of the church in impeachment cases before the House of Commons. Many uses of light in religious ceremonies were revived in cathedrals after the Restoration and they became wide-spread in England in the nineteenth century. As late as 1889 the Archbishop of Canterbury ruled that certain ceremonial candles were lawful according to the Prayer-Book of Edward VI, but the whole question was left open and unsettled.
During the Reformation, the ceremonial use of lights changed significantly and was eliminated in Protestant churches as a sign of superstition and papal control. In Lutheran churches, ceremonial lights were mostly kept, while the Church of England saw many changes due to the rulers' decrees. In the latter church, many debates erupted over ceremonial lights, and their use was one of the accusations against several church officials during impeachment cases in the House of Commons. Many uses of light in religious ceremonies were revived in cathedrals after the Restoration and became widespread in England during the nineteenth century. As late as 1889, the Archbishop of Canterbury stated that certain ceremonial candles were permissible according to the Prayer-Book of Edward VI, but the entire issue remained unresolved and open to debate.
These byways of artificial light are complex and fascinating because their study leads into many channels and far into the obscurity of the childhood of the human race. A glimpse of them is important in a survey of the influence of artificial light upon the progress of civilization because in these usages the innate and acquired impressiveness of light is encountered. Although many ceremonial uses of light remain, it is doubtful if their significance and especially their origin are appreciated by most persons. Nevertheless, no more interesting phase of artificial light is encountered than this, which reaches to the foundation of civilization.
These paths of artificial light are intricate and captivating because studying them reveals many aspects and delves deep into the early history of humanity. Understanding them is crucial for examining the impact of artificial light on the development of civilization since these practices showcase both the natural and learned power of light. While many ceremonial uses of light still exist, it’s uncertain whether most people truly understand their meaning and especially their origins. Still, there’s no more intriguing aspect of artificial light than this, which connects to the very roots of civilization.
V
OIL-LAMPS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY
It will be noted that the light-sources throughout the early ages were flames, the result of burning material. This principle of light-production has persisted until the present time, but in the latter part of the nineteenth century certain departures revolutionized artificial lighting. However, it is not the intention to enter the modern period in this chapter except in following the progress of the oil-lamp through its period of scientific development. The oil-lamp and the candle were the mainstays of artificial lighting throughout many centuries. The fats and waxes which these light-sources burned were many but in the later centuries they were chiefly tallow, sperm-oil, spermaceti, lard-oil, olive-oil, colza-oil, bees-wax and vegetable waxes. Those fuels which are not liquid are melted to liquid form by the heat of the flame before they are actually consumed. The candle is of the latter type and despite its present lowly place and its primitive character, it is really an ingenious device. Its fuel remains conveniently solid so that it is readily shipped and stored; there is nothing to spill or to break beyond easy repair; but when it is lighted the heat of its flame melts the solid fuel and thus it becomes an "oil-lamp." Animal and vegetable oils were mainly used until the middle of the nineteenth century, when petroleum was produced in sufficient quantities to introduce mineral oils. This marked the beginning of an era of developments in oil-lamps, but these were generally the natural offspring of early developments by Ami Argand.
It should be noted that the primary light sources in ancient times were flames from burning materials. This method of producing light has continued to this day, but in the late nineteenth century, certain innovations changed the game for artificial lighting. However, this chapter won't delve into modern times, except to trace the evolution of the oil lamp through its scientific advancements. The oil lamp and candle served as the backbone of artificial lighting for many centuries. The fats and waxes used in these light sources were varied, although in later centuries, they mainly included tallow, sperm oil, spermaceti, lard oil, olive oil, colza oil, beeswax, and vegetable waxes. Solid fuels were melted into liquid by the flame's heat before being consumed. The candle falls into this category; despite its simple design and humble status today, it is quite an ingenious invention. Its fuel remains solid for easy shipping and storage, with nothing to spill or break beyond simple repairs. When lit, the heat of the flame melts the solid fuel, effectively turning it into an "oil lamp." Animal and vegetable oils were primarily used until the mid-nineteenth century, when petroleum began to be produced in large enough quantities to introduce mineral oils. This was the start of a new era in oil lamp development, though these advancements were largely built on the earlier innovations by Ami Argand.
Before man discovered that nature had stored a tremendous supply of mineral oil in the earth he was obliged to hunt broadcast for fats and waxes to supply him with artificial light. He also was obliged to endure unpleasant odors from the crude fuels and in early experiments with fats and waxes the odor was carefully noted as an important factor. Tallow was a by-product of the kitchen or of the butcher. Stearine, a constituent of tallow, is a compound of glyceryl and stearic acid. It is obtained by breaking up chemically the glycerides of animal fats and separating the fatty acids from glycerin. Fats are glycerides; that is, combinations of oleic, palmetic, and stearic acids. Inasmuch as the former is liquid at ordinary temperatures and the others are solid, it follows that the consistency or solidity of fats depend upon the relative proportions of the three constituents. The sperm-whale, which lives in the warmer parts of all the oceans, has been hunted relentlessly for fuels for artificial lighting. In its head cavities sperm-oil in liquid form is found with the white waxy substance known as spermaceti. Colza-oil is yielded by rape-seed and olive-oil is extracted from ripe olives. The waxes are combinations of allied acids with bases somewhat related to glycerin but of complex composition. Fats and waxes are more or less related, but to distinguish them carefully would lead far afield into the complexities of organic chemistry. All these animal and vegetable products which were used as fuels for light-sources are rich in carbon, which accounts for the light-value of their flames. The brightness of such a flame is due to incandescent carbon particles, but this phase of light-production is discussed in another chapter. These oils, fats, and waxes are composed by weight of about 75 to 80 per cent. carbon; 10 to 15 per cent. hydrogen; and 5 to 10 per cent. oxygen.
Before people realized that nature had stored a huge supply of mineral oil underground, they had to search everywhere for fats and waxes to provide them with artificial light. They also had to deal with unpleasant smells from the crude fuels, and in early tests with fats and waxes, the odor was noted as an important factor. Tallow was a leftover product from the kitchen or the butcher. Stearine, a component of tallow, is made up of glyceryl and stearic acid. It is produced by chemically breaking down the glycerides of animal fats and separating the fatty acids from glycerin. Fats are glycerides, meaning they’re combinations of oleic, palmitic, and stearic acids. Since oleic acid is liquid at normal temperatures and the others are solid, the consistency of fats depends on the relative amounts of these three components. The sperm whale, which lives in warmer parts of all oceans, has been hunted extensively for fuel for artificial lighting. In its head cavities, liquid sperm oil is found along with the white waxy substance known as spermaceti. Colza oil is produced from rapeseed, and olive oil is extracted from ripe olives. Waxes are combinations of similar acids with bases somewhat related to glycerin but with complex compositions. Fats and waxes are somewhat related, but carefully distinguishing them would lead into the complexities of organic chemistry. All these animal and vegetable products used as fuels for light sources are rich in carbon, which gives them their light-producing ability. The brightness of such a flame is due to incandescent carbon particles, but this aspect of light production is covered in another chapter. These oils, fats, and waxes are made up of about 75 to 80 percent carbon, 10 to 15 percent hydrogen, and 5 to 10 percent oxygen by weight.
Until the middle of the eighteenth century the oil-lamps were shallow vessels filled with animal or vegetable oil and from these reservoirs short wicks projected. The flame was feeble and smoky and the odors were sometimes very repugnant. Viewing such light-sources from the present age in which light is plentiful, convenient, and free from the great disadvantages of these early oil-lamps, it is difficult to imagine the possibility of the present civilization emerging from that period without being accompanied by progress in light-production. The improvements made in the eighteenth century paved the way for greater progress in the following century. This is the case throughout the ages, but there are special reasons for the tremendous impetus which light-production has experienced in the past half-century. These are the acquirement of scientific knowledge from systematic research and the application of this knowledge by organized development.
Until the mid-eighteenth century, oil lamps were shallow containers filled with animal or vegetable oil, and short wicks stuck out from these reservoirs. The flame was weak and smoky, and the smells were often quite unpleasant. Looking at these light sources from today's perspective, where light is abundant, convenient, and free from the major drawbacks of early oil lamps, it's hard to imagine how our current civilization could have developed from that time without advancements in light production. The improvements made in the eighteenth century set the stage for greater progress in the following century. This has been true throughout history, but there are specific reasons for the significant boost that light production has seen in the past fifty years. These include the acquisition of scientific knowledge through systematic research and the application of that knowledge through organized development.
The first and most notable improvement in the oil-lamp was made by Argand in 1784. Our nation was just organizing after its successful struggle for independence at the time when the production of light as a science was born. Argand produced the tubular wick and contributed the greatest improvement by being the first to perform the apparently simple act of placing a glass chimney upon the lamp. His burner consisted of two concentric metal tubes between which the wick was located. The inner tube was open, so that air could reach the inner surface of the wick as well as the outer surface. The lamp chimney not only protected the flame from drafts but also improved combustion by increasing the supply of air. It rested upon a perforated flange below the burner. If the glass chimney of a modern kerosene lamp be lifted, it will be noted that the flame flickers and smokes and that it becomes steady and smokeless when the chimney is replaced. The advantages of such a chimney are obvious now, but Argand for his achievements is entitled to a place among the great men who have borne the torch of civilization. He took the first step toward adequate artificial light and opened a new era in lighting.
The first and most significant improvement in the oil lamp was made by Argand in 1784. At that time, our nation was just getting organized after successfully fighting for its independence, and the study of light as a science was emerging. Argand invented the tubular wick and made the biggest enhancement by being the first to place a glass chimney on the lamp. His burner consisted of two concentric metal tubes, with the wick situated in between. The inner tube was open, allowing air to reach both the inner and outer surfaces of the wick. The lamp chimney not only protected the flame from drafts but also enhanced combustion by increasing the airflow. It rested on a perforated flange below the burner. If you lift the glass chimney of a modern kerosene lamp, you will notice the flame flickers and smokes, and it becomes steady and smokeless once the chimney is replaced. The benefits of such a chimney are clear now, but Argand deserves recognition among the great individuals who have illuminated the path of civilization. He took the first step toward adequate artificial light and ushered in a new era in lighting.
The various improvements of the oil-lamp achieved by Argand combined to effect complete combustion, with the result that a steady, smokeless lamp of considerable luminous intensity was for the first time available. Many developments followed, among which was a combination of reservoir and gravity feed which maintained the oil at a constant level. In later lamps, upon the adoption of mineral oil, this was found unnecessary, perhaps owing to the construction of the wick and to the physical characteristics of the oil which favored capillary action in the wick. However, the height of the oil in the reservoir of modern oil-lamps makes some difference in the amount of light emitted.
The various upgrades to the oil lamp made by Argand allowed for complete combustion, resulting in a steady, smokeless lamp with significant brightness available for the first time. Many advancements followed, including a design that combined a reservoir and gravity feed to keep the oil at a constant level. Later lamps, with the use of mineral oil, didn’t need this feature, probably due to the design of the wick and the oil's physical properties that enhanced capillary action in the wick. However, the oil level in the reservoirs of modern oil lamps still affects the amount of light produced.
The Carcel lamp, which appeared in 1800, consisted of a double piston operated by clockwork. This forced the oil through a tube to the burner. Franchot invented the moderator lamp in 1836, which, because of its simplicity and efficiency soon superseded many other lamps designed for burning animal and vegetable oils. The chief feature of the moderator lamp is a spiral spring which forces the oil upward through a vertical tube to the burner. These are still used to some extent in France, but owing to the fact that "mechanical" lamps eventually were very generally replaced by more simple ones, it does not appear necessary to describe these complex mechanisms in detail.
The Carcel lamp, introduced in 1800, had a double piston powered by clockwork. This mechanism pushed the oil through a tube to the burner. Franchot created the moderator lamp in 1836, which, due to its simplicity and efficiency, quickly replaced many other lamps that used animal and vegetable oils. The main feature of the moderator lamp is a spiral spring that pushes the oil upward through a vertical tube to the burner. These lamps are still somewhat used in France, but since "mechanical" lamps were eventually widely replaced by simpler designs, there's no need to go into detail about these complex mechanisms.
When coal is distilled at moderate temperatures, volatile liquids are obtained. These hydrocarbons, being inflammable, naturally attracted attention when first known, and in 1781 their use as fuel for lamps was suggested. However, it was not until 1820 that the light oils obtained by distilling coal-tar, a by-product of the coal-gas industry which was then in its early stage of development, were burned to some extent in the Holliday lamp. In this lamp the oil is contained in a reservoir from the bottom of which a fine metal tube carries the oil down to a rose-burner. The oil is heated by the flame and the vaporized mineral oil which escapes through small orifices is burned. This type of lamp has undergone many physical changes, but its principle survives to the present time in the gasolene and kerosene burners hanging on a pole by the side of the street-peddler's stand.
When coal is distilled at moderate temperatures, it produces volatile liquids. These hydrocarbons, which are flammable, drew attention when they were first discovered, and in 1781, someone suggested using them as fuel for lamps. However, it wasn't until 1820 that the light oils extracted from coal tar—a by-product of the coal-gas industry that was still developing—were used to some degree in the Holliday lamp. This lamp has a reservoir for the oil, from which a thin metal tube transports the oil to a rose-burner. The flame heats the oil, and the vaporized mineral oil that escapes through small openings is burned. This type of lamp has gone through many physical changes, but its basic principle still exists today in the gasoline and kerosene burners found hanging on poles by street vendors' stands.
Although petroleum products were not used to any appreciable extent for illuminating-purposes until after the middle of the nineteenth century, mineral oil is mentioned by Herodotus and other early writers. In 1847 petroleum was discovered in a coal-mine in England, but the supply failed in a short time. However, the discoverer, James Young, had found that this oil was valuable as a lubricant and upon the failure of this source he began experiments in distilling oil from shale found in coal deposits. These were destined to form the corner-stone of the oil industry in Scotland. In 1850 he began producing petroleum in this manner, but it was not seriously considered for illuminating-purposes. However, in Germany about this time lamps were developed for burning the lighter distillates and these were introduced into several countries. But the price of these lighter oils was so great that little progress was made until, in 1859, Col. E. L. Drake discovered oil in Pennsylvania. By studying the geological formations and concluding that oil should be obtained by boring, Drake gave to the world a means of obtaining petroleum, and in quantities which were destined to reduce the price of mineral oil to a level undreamed of theretofore. To his imagination, which saw vast reservoirs of oil in the depths of the earth, the world owes a great debt. Lamps were imported from Germany to all parts of the civilized world and the kerosene lamp became the prevailing light-source. Hundreds of American patents were allowed for oil-lamps and their improvements in the next decade.
Although petroleum products weren't used extensively for lighting until after the mid-nineteenth century, mineral oil is mentioned by Herodotus and other early writers. In 1847, petroleum was discovered in a coal mine in England, but the supply quickly ran out. However, the discoverer, James Young, realized that this oil was valuable as a lubricant, and after this source dried up, he started experimenting with distilling oil from shale found in coal deposits. These experiments became the foundation of the oil industry in Scotland. In 1850, he began producing petroleum this way, but it wasn’t taken seriously for lighting purposes at the time. Meanwhile, in Germany, lamps were developed for burning lighter distillates, which were introduced to several countries. However, the cost of these lighter oils was so high that progress was slow until 1859, when Col. E. L. Drake discovered oil in Pennsylvania. By studying geological formations and concluding that oil could be extracted by drilling, Drake provided the world with a way to obtain petroleum in quantities that would eventually lower the price of mineral oil to levels previously unimaginable. The world owes a great debt to his vision, which saw vast reservoirs of oil beneath the earth's surface. Lamps were imported from Germany to all parts of the civilized world, and the kerosene lamp became the leading light source. Hundreds of American patents were granted for oil lamps and their improvements over the next decade.
The crude petroleum, of course, is not fit for illuminating purposes, but it contains components which are satisfactory. The various components are sorted out by fractional distillation and the oil for burning in lamps is selected according to its volatility, viscosity, stability, etc. It must not be so volatile as to have a dangerously low flashing-point, nor so stable as to hinder its burning well. In this fractional distillation a vast variety of products are now obtained. Gasolene is among the lighter products, with a density of about 0.65; kerosene has a density of about 0.80; the lubricating-oils from 0.85 to 0.95; and there are many solids such as vaseline and paraffin which are widely used for many purposes. This process of refining oils is now the source of paraffin for making candles, in which it is usually mixed with substances like stearin in order to raise its melting-point.
Crude oil isn't suitable for lighting, but it does contain useful components. These components are separated through fractional distillation, and the oil for lamps is chosen based on its volatility, viscosity, stability, and other factors. It shouldn’t be too volatile, as that would result in a dangerously low flash point, nor too stable, as that would make it burn poorly. This fractional distillation process now yields a wide range of products. Gasoline is one of the lighter products, with a density of about 0.65; kerosene has a density of about 0.80; lubricating oils range from 0.85 to 0.95; and there are numerous solids like vaseline and paraffin, which are used for many applications. This oil refining process is now the source of paraffin for candle making, where it’s often mixed with ingredients like stearin to increase its melting point.
Crude petroleum possesses a very repugnant odor; it varies in color from yellow to black; and its specific gravity ranges from about 0.80 to 1.00, but commonly is between 0.80 and 0.90. Its chemical constitution is chiefly of carbon and hydrogen, in the approximate ratio of about six to one respectively. It is a mixture of paraffin hydrocarbons having the general formula of CnH2n+2 and the individual members of this series vary from CH4 (methane) to C15H32 (pentadecane), although the solid hydrocarbons are still more complex. Petroleum is found in many countries and the United States is particularly blessed with great stores of it.
Crude oil has a very unpleasant smell; it ranges in color from yellow to black, and its specific gravity is between about 0.80 and 1.00, though it's usually between 0.80 and 0.90. Its chemical makeup is mainly carbon and hydrogen, in a rough ratio of about six to one. It consists of paraffin hydrocarbons with the general formula CnH2n+2, and the individual compounds in this series range from CH4 (methane) to C15H32 (pentadecane), although solid hydrocarbons are even more complex. Oil is found in many countries, and the United States has particularly large reserves of it.
The ordinary lamp consisting of a wick which draws up the mineral oil and feeds it to a flame is efficient and fairly free from danger. It requires care and may cause disaster if it is upset, but it has been blamed unjustly in many accidents. A disadvantage of the kerosene lamp over electric lighting, for example, is the relatively greater possibility of accidents through the carelessness of the user. This point is brought out in statistics of fire-insurance companies, which show that the fires caused by kerosene lamps are much more numerous than those from other methods of lighting. If in a modern lamp of proper construction a close-fitting wick is used and the lamp is extinguished by turning down and blowing across the chimney, there is little danger in its use excepting accidental breakage or overturning.
The standard lamp that uses a wick to draw up mineral oil and fuel a flame is efficient and relatively safe. It needs some attention and can cause accidents if knocked over, but it has been unfairly blamed for many mishaps. One downside of kerosene lamps compared to electric lights is the higher risk of accidents due to the user's carelessness. This is reflected in statistics from fire insurance companies, which indicate that fires caused by kerosene lamps are much more frequent than those from other lighting sources. However, if a modern lamp is well designed with a snug wick and is extinguished by turning it down and blowing across the chimney, there’s minimal risk involved outside of accidental breakage or tipping over.
In oil-lamps at the present time mineral oils are used which possess flashing-points above 75°F. The highly volatile components of petroleum are dangerous because they form very explosive mixtures with air at ordinary temperatures. A mineral oil like kerosene, to be used with safety in lamps, should not be too volatile. It is preferable that an inflammable vapor should not be given off at temperatures under 120°F. The oil must be of such physical characteristics as to be drawn up to the burner by capillarity from the reservoir which is situated below. It is volatilized by the heat of the flame into a mixture of hydrogen and hydrocarbon gases and these are consumed under the heat of the process of consumption by the oxygen in the air. The resulting products of this combustion, if it is complete, are carbon dioxide and water-vapor. For each candle-power of light per hour about 0.24 cubic foot of carbon dioxide and 0.18 cubic foot of water-vapor are formed by a modern oil-lamp. That an open flame devours something from the air is easily demonstrated by enclosing it in an air-tight space. The flame gradually becomes feeble and smoky and finally goes out. It will be noted that a burning lamp will vitiate the atmosphere of a closed room by consuming the oxygen and returning in its place carbon dioxide. This is similar to the vitiation of the atmosphere by breathing persons and tests indicate that for each two candle-power emitted by a kerosene flame the vitiation is equal to that produced by one adult person. Inasmuch as oil-lamps are ordinarily of 10 to 20 candle-power, it is seen that one lamp will consume as much oxygen as several persons.
In modern lamps, mineral oils are used that have flash points above 75°F. The highly volatile parts of petroleum are risky because they can create very explosive mixtures with air at normal temperatures. A mineral oil like kerosene, when used safely in lamps, shouldn't be too volatile. It's better if it doesn't produce flammable vapor at temperatures below 120°F. The oil needs to have the right physical properties to be drawn up to the burner by capillarity from the reservoir below. It vaporizes from the heat of the flame into a mix of hydrogen and hydrocarbon gases, which are then burned using the oxygen in the air. When combustion is complete, the byproducts are carbon dioxide and water vapor. For each hour of light produced at one candle power, about 0.24 cubic feet of carbon dioxide and 0.18 cubic feet of water vapor are created by a modern oil lamp. It's easy to see that an open flame consumes something from the air by sealing it in an airtight space. The flame gradually dims, produces smoke, and eventually goes out. A burning lamp will deplete the oxygen in a closed room by consuming it and replacing it with carbon dioxide. This is similar to how breathing affects the atmosphere, and tests show that for every two candle-power emitted by a kerosene flame, the oxygen depletion is equivalent to that caused by one adult person. Since oil lamps typically produce 10 to 20 candle-power, it's clear that one lamp can consume as much oxygen as several people.
In order that oil-lamps may produce a brilliant light free from smoke, combustion must be complete. The correct quantity of oil must be fed to the burner and it must be properly vaporized by heat. If insufficient oil is fed, the intensity of the light is diminished and if too much is available at the burner, smoke and other products of incomplete combustion will be emitted. The wick is an important factor, for, through capillarity, it feeds oil forcefully to the burner against the action of gravity. This action of a wick is commonly looked upon with indifference but in reality it is caused by an interesting and really wonderful phenomenon. Wicks are usually made of high-grade cotton fiber loosely spun into coarse threads and these are woven into a loose plait. The wick must be dry before being inserted into the burner; and it is desirable that it be considerably longer than is necessary merely to reach the bottom of the reservoir. A flame burning in the open will smoke because insufficient oxygen is brought in contact with it. The injurious products of this incomplete combustion are carbon monoxide and oil vapors, which are a menace to health.
To ensure that oil lamps give off a bright light without producing smoke, combustion must be complete. The right amount of oil needs to be supplied to the burner, and it has to be properly vaporized by heat. If there's not enough oil, the light's intensity decreases, and if there's too much oil at the burner, smoke and other byproducts from incomplete combustion will be released. The wick plays a crucial role because it draws oil up to the burner against gravity through capillarity. This function of the wick is often overlooked, but it's actually caused by an interesting and impressive phenomenon. Wicks are typically made from high-quality cotton fibers, loosely spun into thick threads and woven into a loose braid. The wick must be dry before putting it into the burner, and it should ideally be longer than necessary to reach the bottom of the reservoir. A flame burning outdoors will produce smoke due to not having enough oxygen. The harmful byproducts of this incomplete combustion are carbon monoxide and oil vapors, which pose health risks.
To supply the necessary amount of oxygen (air) to the flame, a forced draft is produced. Chimneys are simple means of accomplishing this, and this is their function whether on oil-lamps or factories. Other means of forced draft have been used, such as small fans or compressed air. In the railway locomotive the short smoke-stack is insufficient for supplying large quantities of air to the fire-box so the exhausted steam is allowed to escape into the stack. With each noisy puff of smoke a quantity of air is forcibly drawn into the fire-box through the burning fuel. In the modern oil-lamp the rush of air due to the "pull" of the chimney is broken and the air is diffused by the wire gauze or holes at the base of the burner. These metal parts, being hot, also serve to warm the oil before it reaches the burning end of the wick, thus serving to aid vaporization and combustion.
To provide the needed amount of oxygen (air) to the flame, a forced draft is created. Chimneys are a straightforward way to achieve this, and that's their purpose whether it's for oil lamps or factories. Other methods of forced draft have been utilized, such as small fans or compressed air. In a railway locomotive, the short smokestack isn't enough to supply large volumes of air to the firebox, so the exhausted steam is allowed to escape into the stack. With each loud puff of smoke, a burst of air is pulled into the firebox through the burning fuel. In modern oil lamps, the airflow generated by the "pull" of the chimney is interrupted, and the air is spread out by the wire mesh or holes at the base of the burner. These metal parts, which get hot, also help to warm the oil before it reaches the burning end of the wick, thus aiding in vaporization and combustion.
The consumption of oil per candle-power per hour varies considerably with the kind of lamp and with the character of the oil. The average consumption of oil-lamps burning a mineral oil of about 0.80 specific gravity and a rather high flashing-point is about 50 to 60 grams of oil per candle-power per hour for well-designed flame-lamps. Kerosene weighs about 6.6 pounds per gallon; therefore, about 800 candle-power hours per gallon are obtained from modern lamps employing wicks. Kerosene lamps are usually of 10 to 20 candle-power, although they are made up to 100 candle-power. These luminous intensities refer to the maximum horizontal candle-power. The best practice now deals with the total light output, which is expressed in lumens, and on this basis a consumption of one gallon of kerosene per hour would yield about 8000 lumens.
The amount of oil used per candle-power per hour varies a lot depending on the type of lamp and the quality of the oil. On average, well-designed flame lamps that use a mineral oil with a specific gravity of about 0.80 and a relatively high flashing point consume around 50 to 60 grams of oil per candle-power per hour. Kerosene weighs about 6.6 pounds per gallon, so modern lamps with wicks provide about 800 candle-power hours per gallon. Kerosene lamps typically range from 10 to 20 candle-power, but some can go up to 100 candle-power. These luminous intensities refer to the maximum horizontal candle-power. Current best practices focus on the total light output measured in lumens, where one gallon of kerosene consumed per hour would produce about 8000 lumens.
Oil-lamps have been devised in which the oil is burned as a spray ejected by air-pressure. These burn with a large flame; however, a serious feature is the escape of considerable oil which is not burned. These lamps are used in industrial lighting, especially outdoors, and possess the advantage of consuming low-grade oils. They produce about 700 to 800 candle-power hours per gallon of oil. Lamps of this type of the larger sizes burn with vertical flames two or three feet high. The oil is heated as it approaches the nozzle and is fairly well vaporized on emerging into the air. The names of Lucigen, Wells, Doty, and others are associated with this type of lamp or torch, which is a step in the direction of air-gas lighting.
Oil lamps have been designed to burn oil as a spray ejected by air pressure. These produce a large flame; however, a significant issue is the substantial amount of oil that goes unburned. These lamps are commonly used for industrial lighting, especially outdoors, and have the advantage of using low-grade oils. They generate about 700 to 800 candle-power hours per gallon of oil. Larger versions of these lamps burn with vertical flames that reach two to three feet high. The oil gets heated as it moves towards the nozzle and is fairly well vaporized when it exits into the air. The names Lucigen, Wells, Doty, and others are linked with this type of lamp or torch, representing a move towards air-gas lighting.
During the latter part of the nineteenth century numerous developments were made which paralleled the progress in gas-lighting. Experiments were conducted which bordered closely upon the next epochal event in light-production—the appearance of the gas mantle. One of these was the use of platinum gauze by Kitson. He produced an apparatus similar to the oil-spray lamp, on a small and more delicate scale. The hot blue flame was not very luminous and he attempted to obtain light by heating a mantle of fine platinum gauze. Although these mantles emitted a brilliant light for a few hours, their light-emissivity was destroyed by carbonization. After the appearance of the Welsbach mantle, Kitson's lamp and others met with success by utilizing it. From this point, attention was centered upon the new wonder, which is discussed in a later chapter after certain scientific principles in light-production have been discussed.
During the late nineteenth century, many advancements were made that coincided with the progress in gas lighting. Experiments were conducted that were closely related to the next significant breakthrough in light production—the introduction of the gas mantle. One such experiment involved the use of platinum gauze by Kitson. He created a device similar to the oil-spray lamp, but on a smaller and more delicate scale. The hot blue flame produced wasn’t very bright, so he tried to generate light by heating a mantle made of fine platinum gauze. While these mantles produced a brilliant light for a few hours, their ability to emit light was compromised by carbon buildup. After the Welsbach mantle was introduced, Kitson’s lamp and others became successful by using it. From this point on, the focus shifted to this new marvel, which is discussed in a later chapter after some scientific principles of light production have been explained.
The kerosene or mineral-oil lamp was a boon to lighting in the nineteenth century and even to-day it is a blessing in many homes, especially in villages, in the country, and in the remote districts of civilization. Its extensive use at the present time is shown by the fact that about eight million lamp-chimneys are now being manufactured yearly in this country. It is convenient and safe when carelessness is avoided, and is fairly free from odor. Its vitiation of the atmosphere may be counteracted by proper ventilation and there remains only the disadvantage of keeping it in order and of accidental breakage and overturning. The kerosene lantern is widely used to-day, but the danger due to accident is ever-present. The consequences of such accidents are often serious and are exemplified in the terrible conflagration in Chicago in 1871, when Mrs. O'Leary's cow kicked over a lantern and started a fire which burned the city. Modern developments in lighting are gradually encroaching upon the territory in which the oil-lamp has reigned supreme for many years. Acetylene plants were introduced to a considerable extent some time ago and to-day the self-contained home-lighting electric plant is being installed in large numbers in the country homes of the land.
The kerosene or mineral-oil lamp was a great advancement in lighting during the nineteenth century, and even today, it remains a valuable asset in many homes, especially in villages, rural areas, and remote regions. Its ongoing popularity is evident, with around eight million lamp chimneys being produced each year in this country. It's convenient and safe if handled carefully, and it generally doesn't have a strong odor. Any negative impact on air quality can be managed with proper ventilation, leaving only the issues of maintenance and the risk of breakage or tipping over. The kerosene lantern is still commonly used today, but the risk of accidents is always present. The outcomes of such incidents can be serious, as illustrated by the devastating fire in Chicago in 1871, which started when Mrs. O'Leary's cow knocked over a lantern. Modern lighting options are slowly taking over the space where oil lamps have dominated for many years. Acetylene lighting became more widespread some time ago, and nowadays, electric lighting systems for homes are being installed in large numbers in rural households across the country.
VI
EARLY GAS-LIGHTING
Owing to the fact that the smoky, flickering oil-lamp persisted throughout the centuries and until the magic touch of Argand in the latter part of the eighteenth century transformed it into a commendable light-source, the reader is prepared to suppose that gas-lighting is of recent origin. Apparently William Murdock in England was the first to install pipes for the conveyance of gas for lighting purposes. In an article in the "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London" dated February 25, 1808, in which he gives an account of the first industrial gas-lighting, he states:
Due to the fact that the smoky, flickering oil lamp lasted for centuries until Argand's innovative design in the late eighteenth century turned it into a reliable light source, one might assume that gas lighting is a recent development. It seems that William Murdock in England was the first to set up pipes for transporting gas for lighting. In an article in the "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London" dated February 25, 1808, he describes the first instance of industrial gas lighting, stating:
It is now nearly sixteen years, since, in a course of experiments I was making at Redruth in Cornwall, upon the quantities and qualities of the gases produced by distillation from different mineral and vegetable substances, I was induced by some observation I had previously made upon the burning of coal, to try the combustible property of the gases produced from it....
It’s been nearly sixteen years since I was doing experiments in Redruth, Cornwall, focused on the quantities and types of gases produced by distilling different mineral and plant materials. Some earlier observations I made about burning coal led me to test the flammable properties of the gases produced from it...
Inasmuch as he is credited with having lighted his home by means of piped gas, this experimental installation may be considered to have been made in 1792. In his first trial he burned the gas at the open ends of the pipes; but finding this wasteful, he closed the ends and in each bored three small holes from which the gas-flames diverged. It is said that he once used his wife's thimble in an emergency to close the end of the pipe; and, the thimble being much worn and consequently containing a number of small holes, tiny gas-jets emerged from the holes. This incident is said to have led to the use of small holes in his burners. He also lighted a street lamp and had bladders filled with gas "to carry at night, with which, and his little steam carriage running on the road, he used to astonish the people." Apparently unknown to Murdock, previous observations had been made as to the inflammability of gas from coal. Long before this Dr. Clayton described some observations on coal-gas, which he called "the spirit of coals." He filled bladders with this gas and kept them for some time. Upon his pricking one of them with a pin and applying a candle, the gas burned at the hole. Thus Clayton had a portable gas-light. He was led to experiment with distillation of coal from some experiences with gas from a natural coal bed, and he thus describes his initial laboratory experiment:
As he is known for lighting his home with piped gas, this experimental setup can be dated back to 1792. In his first attempt, he burned the gas at the open ends of the pipes; however, finding this inefficient, he sealed the ends and bored three small holes in each pipe, allowing the gas flames to spread out. There's a story that he once used his wife's thimble in an emergency to seal the end of a pipe; since the thimble was quite worn and had several small holes, tiny jets of gas spouted from them. This incident supposedly inspired him to incorporate small holes in his burners. He also lit a street lamp and had gas-filled bladders to carry at night, which, along with his small steam carriage on the road, amazed the locals. Unbeknownst to Murdock, others had previously studied the flammability of gas from coal. Long before this, Dr. Clayton noted some observations on coal gas, which he referred to as "the spirit of coals." He filled bladders with this gas and stored them for a while. When he pricked one with a pin and brought a candle close, the gas ignited at the puncture. Thus, Clayton had a portable gas light. His experiments with distilling coal were inspired by experiences with gas from a natural coal bed, leading to his initial lab experiment:
I got some coal, and distilled it in a retort in an open fire. At first there came over only phlegm, afterwards a black oil, and then likewise, a spirit arose which I could no ways condense; but it forced my lute and broke my glasses. Once when it had forced my lute, coming close thereto, in order to try to repair it, I observed that the spirit which issued out caught fire at the flame of the candle, and continued burning with violence as it issued out in a stream, which I blew out, and lighted again alternately several times.
I got some coal and distilled it in a retort over an open fire. At first, only some thick substance came out, then a black oil, and after that, a spirit appeared that I couldn't condense; it damaged my lute and broke my glassware. Once, when it had forced my lute, I leaned in to try to fix it and noticed that the escaping spirit caught fire from the flame of the candle and kept burning fiercely as it poured out in a stream, which I blew out and relit several times.
He then turned his attention to saving some of the gas and hit upon the use of bladders. He was surprised at the amount of gas which was obtained from a small amount of coal; for, as he stated, "the spirit continued to rise for several hours, and filled the bladders almost as fast as a man could have blown them with his mouth; and yet the quantity of coals distilled was inconsiderable."
He then focused on saving some of the gas and came up with the idea of using bladders. He was amazed by the amount of gas produced from just a little coal; as he noted, "the spirit kept rising for several hours and filled the bladders almost as quickly as someone could blow them up with their mouth; yet the amount of coal used was quite small."
Although this account appeared in the Transactions of the Royal Society in 1739, there is strong evidence that Dr. Clayton had written it many years before, at least prior to 1691.
Although this account was published in the Transactions of the Royal Society in 1739, there is strong evidence that Dr. Clayton had written it many years earlier, at least before 1691.
But before entering further into the early history of gas-lighting, it is interesting to inquire into the knowledge possessed in the seventeenth century pertaining to natural and artificial gas. Doubtless there are isolated instances throughout history of encounters with natural gas. Surely observant persons of bygone ages have noted a small flame emanating from the end of a stick whose other end was burning in a bonfire or in the fireplace. This is a gas-plant on a small scale; for the gas is formed at the burning end of the wooden stick and is conducted through its hollow center to the cold end, where it will burn if lighted. If a piece of paper be rolled into the form of a tube and inclined somewhat from a horizontal position, inflammable gas will emanate from the upper end if the lower end is burning. By applying a match near the upper end, we can ignite this jet of gas. However, it is certain that little was known of gas for illuminating purposes before the eighteenth century.
But before diving deeper into the early history of gas lighting, it's interesting to look into what people in the seventeenth century knew about natural and artificial gas. There are definitely some isolated examples throughout history of encounters with natural gas. People in past ages likely noticed a small flame coming from the end of a stick that was burning in a bonfire or fireplace. This is a small-scale gas source; the gas forms at the burning end of the stick and travels through its hollow middle to the cooler end, where it can ignite if a flame is applied. If you roll a piece of paper into a tube and tilt it a bit, flammable gas will come out of the upper end if the lower end is burning. By holding a match near the upper end, you can ignite this gas jet. However, it's clear that not much was known about gas for lighting purposes before the eighteenth century.
The literature of an ancient nation is often referred to as revealing the civilization of the period. Surely the scientific literature which deals with concrete facts is an exact indicator of the technical knowledge of a period! That little was known of natural gas and doubtless of artificial gas in the seventeenth century is shown by a brief report entitled "A Well and Earth in Lancashire taking Fire at a Candle," by Tho. Shirley in the Transactions of the Royal Society in 1667. Much of the quaint charm of the original is lost by inability to present the text in its original form, but it is reproduced as closely as practicable. The report was as follows:
The literature of an ancient civilization often reflects the era's culture. Surely the scientific literature that focuses on concrete facts accurately shows the technical knowledge of the time! The limited understanding of natural gas—and probably artificial gas—in the seventeenth century is illustrated by a brief report titled "A Well and Earth in Lancashire taking Fire at a Candle," by Tho. Shirley, published in the Transactions of the Royal Society in 1667. Much of the original's unique charm is lost because we can't present the text exactly as it was, but we’ve reproduced it as closely as possible. The report was as follows:
About the latter End of Feb. 1659, returning from a Journey to my House in Wigan, I was entertained with the Relation of an odd Spring situated in one Mr. Hawkley's Ground (if I mistake not) about a Mile from the Town, in that Road which leads to Warrington and Chester: The People of this Town did confidently affirm, That the Water of this Spring did burn like Oil.
Around the end of February 1659, while returning from a trip to my house in Wigan, I learned about a strange spring on Mr. Hawkley's property (if I'm correct) about a mile from town, along the road to Warrington and Chester. The people in town confidently claimed that the water from this spring burned like oil.
When we came to the said Spring (being 5 or 6 in Company together) and applied a lighted Candle to the Surface of the Water; there was 'tis true, a large Flame suddenly produced, which burnt the Foot of a Tree, growing on the Top of a neighbouring Bank, the Water of which Spring filled a Ditch that was there, and covered the Burning-place; I applied the lighted Candle to divers Parts of the Water contained in the said Ditch, and found, as I expected, that upon the Touch of the Candle and the Water the Flame was extinct.
When we arrived at the Spring (there were about 5 or 6 of us together) and held a lit candle above the water's surface, a large flame suddenly appeared, burning the base of a tree on the edge of a nearby bank. The water from that Spring filled a ditch right there and covered the spot where the fire was. I held the lit candle to different parts of the water in the ditch and, as I expected, when the candle touched the water, the flame went out.
Again, having taken up a Dish full of water at the flaming Place, and held the lighted Candle to it, it went out. Yet I observed that the Water, at the Burning-place, did boil, and heave, like Water in a Pot upon the Fire, tho' by putting my Hand into it, I could not perceive it so much as warm.
Again, after scooping up a dish full of water from the burning spot and holding the lit candle to it, the candle went out. However, I noticed that the water at the burning spot was boiling and bubbling like water in a pot over a fire, even though I couldn’t feel any warmth when I put my hand in it.
This Boiling I conceived to proceed from the Eruption of some bituminous or sulphureous Fumes; considering this Place was not above 30 or 40 Yards distant from the Mouth of a Coal-Pit there: And indeed Wigan, Ashton, and the whole Country, for many Miles compass, is underlaid with Coal. Then, applying my Hand to the Surface of the Burning-place of the Water, I found a strong Breath, as it were a Wind, to bear against my Hand.
This boiling seems to come from some sort of bituminous or sulfurous fumes, considering this place is only about 30 or 40 yards away from the opening of a nearby coal pit. In fact, Wigan, Ashton, and the entire area for many miles around sit atop coal. Then, when I placed my hand on the surface of the burning water, I felt a strong draft, almost like wind, pushing against my hand.
When the Water was drained away, I applied the Candle to the Surface of the dry Earth, at the same Point where the Water burned before; the Fumes took fire, and burned very bright and vigorous. The Cone of the Flame ascended a Foot and a half from the Superficies of the Earth; and the Basis of it was of the Compass of a Man's Hat about the Brims. I then caused a Bucket full of Water to be pour'd on the Fire, by which it was presently quenched. I did not perceive the Flame to be discoloured like that of sulphurous Bodies, nor to have any manifest Scent with it. The Fumes, when they broke out of the Earth, and press'd against my Hand, were not, to my best Remembrance, at all hot.
When the water was drained away, I brought the candle close to the surface of the dry earth, right where the water had burned before. The fumes ignited and burned very brightly and intensely. The flame rose about a foot and a half from the ground, and the base was about the size of a man's hat brim. I then had a bucket of water poured on the fire, which quickly extinguished it. I didn’t notice the flame being discolored like sulfurous substances, nor did it have any noticeable smell. The fumes, when they escaped from the earth and touched my hand, didn’t feel hot at all, as far as I can remember.
Turning again to Dr. Clayton's experiments, we see that he pointed out striking and valuable properties of coal-gas but apparently gave no attention to its useful purposes. Furthermore, his account appears to have attracted no particular notice at the time of its publication in 1739. Dr. Richard Watson in 1767 described the results of experiments which he had been making with the products arising from the distillation of coal. In his process he permitted the gas to ascend through curved tubes, and he particularly noted "its great inflammability as well as elasticity." He also observed that "it retained the former property after it had passed through a great quantity of water." His published account dealt with a variety of facts and computations pertaining to the quantities of coke, tar, etc., produced from different kinds of coal and was a scientific work of value, but apparently the usefulness of the property of inflammability of coal-gas did not occur to him.
Turning back to Dr. Clayton's experiments, we see that he pointed out striking and valuable properties of coal gas but seemingly didn't consider its practical applications. Moreover, his account doesn't seem to have received much attention when it was published in 1739. Dr. Richard Watson, in 1767, described the results of his experiments with the byproducts of coal distillation. In his process, he allowed the gas to rise through curved tubes, and he specifically noted "its great inflammability as well as elasticity." He also observed that "it retained the former property after it had passed through a large amount of water." His published work included various facts and calculations related to the quantities of coke, tar, etc., produced from different types of coal and was a valuable scientific contribution, but it seems the practical usefulness of the inflammability of coal gas didn’t cross his mind.
It is usually the habit of the scientific explorer of nature to return from excursions into her unfrequented recesses with new knowledge, to place it upon exhibition, and to return for more. The inventor passes by and sees applications for some of these scientific trophies which are productive of momentous consequences to mankind. Sir Humphrey Davy described his primitive arc-lamp three quarters of a century before Brush developed an arc-lamp for practical purposes. Maxwell and Hertz respectively predicted and produced electromagnetic waves long before Marconi applied this knowledge and developed "wireless" telegraphy. In a similar manner scientific accounts of the production and properties of coal-gas antedated by many years the initial applications made by Murdock to illuminating purposes.
It’s common for scientific explorers of nature to come back from their journeys into untouched areas with new knowledge, which they then showcase before heading out for more. The inventor notices potential uses for some of these scientific discoveries that could have significant impacts on humanity. Sir Humphrey Davy described his early arc lamp nearly seventy-five years before Brush created a practical version. Maxwell and Hertz predicted and generated electromagnetic waves long before Marconi used that knowledge to develop "wireless" telegraphy. Similarly, scientific descriptions of how coal gas is produced and its properties existed many years before Murdock first applied it for lighting purposes.
Up to the beginning of the nineteenth century the civilized world had only a faint glimpse of the illuminating property of gas, but practicable gas-lighting was destined soon to be an epochal event in the progress of lighting. The dawn of modern science was coincident with the dawn of a luminous era.
Up until the early 1800s, the civilized world only had a dim understanding of gas's ability to produce light, but practical gas lighting was about to change that and mark a major milestone in lighting development. The rise of modern science coincided with the beginning of a bright new era.
to which men of genius were invited and resorted from every civilized country, to exercise and to display their talents. The perfection of the manufacturing arts was the great and constant aim of its liberal and enlightened proprietors, Messrs. Boulton and Watt; and whoever resided there was surrounded by a circle of scientific, ingenious, and skilful men, at all times ready to carry into effect the inventions of each other.
talented individuals were invited from every civilized country to demonstrate their skills. The main goal of its forward-thinking and educated owners, Messrs. Boulton and Watt, was to enhance the manufacturing arts; everyone living there was part of a community of scientific, creative, and skilled people, always eager to work on each other's inventions.
The Treaty of Amiens, which gave to England the peace she was sorely in need of, afforded Murdock an opportunity in 1802 favorable for making a public display of gas-lighting. The illumination of the Soho works on this occasion is described as "one of extraordinary splendour." The fronts of the extensive range of buildings were ornamented with a large number of devices which displayed the variety of forms of gas-lights. At that time this was a luminous spectacle of great novelty and the populace came from far and wide "to gaze at, and to admire, this wonderful display of the combined effects of science and art."
The Treaty of Amiens, which provided England the peace it desperately needed, gave Murdock a chance in 1802 to showcase gas lighting to the public. The lighting of the Soho works during this event was described as "one of extraordinary splendor." The fronts of the large buildings were decorated with numerous designs that showcased the variety of gas-light forms. At that time, this was a bright spectacle of great novelty, and people traveled from far and wide "to look at and admire this amazing display of the combined effects of science and art."
Naturally, Murdock had many difficulties to overcome in these early days, but he possessed skill and perseverance. His first retorts for distilling coal were similar to the common glass retort of the chemist. Next he tried cast-iron cylinders placed perpendicularly in a common furnace, and in each were put about fifteen pounds of coal. In 1804 he constructed them with doors at each end, for feeding coal and extracting coke respectively, but these were found inconvenient. In his first lighting installation in the factory of Phillips and Lee in 1805 he used a large retort of the form of a bucket with a cover on it. Inside he installed a loose cage of grating to hold the coal. When carbonization was complete the coke could be removed as a whole by extracting this cage. This retort had a capacity of fifteen hundred pounds of coal. He labored with mechanical details, varied the size and shape of the retorts, and experimented with different temperatures, with the result that he laid a solid foundation for coal-gas lighting. For his achievements he is entitled to an honorable place among the torch-bearers of civilization.
Naturally, Murdock faced many challenges in these early days, but he had skill and determination. His first devices for distilling coal were similar to the typical glass retorts used by chemists. Then he experimented with cast-iron cylinders positioned vertically in a regular furnace, each containing about fifteen pounds of coal. In 1804, he built them with doors on both ends for loading coal and removing coke, but these turned out to be impractical. In his first lighting setup at the Phillips and Lee factory in 1805, he used a large retort shaped like a bucket with a lid. Inside, he added a loose cage with grating to hold the coal. Once the carbonization was finished, he could remove the coke in one piece by taking out this cage. This retort could hold fifteen hundred pounds of coal. He worked on mechanical details, changed the size and shape of the retorts, and tried out different temperatures, ultimately establishing a solid foundation for coal-gas lighting. Because of his achievements, he deserves a respected place among the pioneers of civilization.
The epochal feature of the development of gas-lighting is that here was a possibility for the first time of providing lighting as a public utility. In the early years of the nineteenth century the foundation was laid for the great public-utility organizations of the present time. Furthermore, gas-lighting was an improvement over candles and oil-lamps from the standpoints of convenience, safety, and cost. The latter points are emphasized by Murdock in his paper presented before the Royal Society in 1808, in which he describes the first industrial installation of gas-lighting. He used two types of burners, the Argand and the cockspur. The former resembled the Argand lamp in some respects and the latter was a three-flame burner suggesting a fleur-de-lis. In this installation there were 271 Argand burners and 636 cockspurs. Each of the former "gave a light equal to that of four candles; and each of the latter, a light equal to two and a quarter of the same candles; making therefore the total of the gas light a little more than 2500 candles." The candle to which he refers was a mold candle "of six in the pound" and its light was considered a standard of luminous intensity when it was consuming tallow at the rate of 0.4 oz. (175 grains) per hour. Thus the candle became very early a standard light-source and has persisted as such (with certain variations in the specifications) until the present time. However, during recent years other standard light-sources have been devised.
The groundbreaking aspect of gas lighting development is that it marked the first opportunity to provide lighting as a public utility. In the early 1800s, the groundwork was laid for the major public utility organizations that exist today. Additionally, gas lighting improved upon candles and oil lamps in terms of convenience, safety, and cost. Murdock highlighted these advantages in his 1808 paper presented to the Royal Society, where he described the first industrial gas lighting installation. He used two types of burners: the Argand and the cockspur. The Argand resembled the Argand lamp in some ways, while the cockspur was a three-flame burner resembling a fleur-de-lis. This installation had 271 Argand burners and 636 cockspur burners. Each Argand burner "provided a light equivalent to four candles; and each cockspur produced a light equal to two and a quarter candles; thus, the total gas light was a bit more than 2500 candles." The candle he referred to was a mold candle "of six in the pound," and its light was considered a standard for luminous intensity, burning tallow at the rate of 0.4 oz. (175 grains) per hour. Consequently, the candle early on became a standard light source and has remained so (with some variations in specifications) to this day. However, in recent years, other standard light sources have been created.
According to Murdock, the yearly cost of gas-lighting in this initial case was 600 pounds sterling after allowing generously for interest on capital invested and depreciation of the apparatus. The cost of furnishing the same amount of light by means of candles he computed to be 2000 pounds sterling. This comparison was on the basis of an average of two hours of artificial lighting per day. On the basis of three hours of artificial lighting per day, the relative cost of gas-and candle-lighting was about one to five. Murdock was characteristically modest in discussing his achievements and his following statement should be read with the conditions of the year 1808 in mind:
According to Murdock, the annual cost of gas lighting in this initial case was £600 after generously accounting for interest on the capital invested and the depreciation of the equipment. He estimated that providing the same amount of light with candles would cost £2000. This comparison was based on an average of two hours of artificial lighting each day. With three hours of artificial lighting daily, the relative cost of gas versus candle lighting was about one to five. Murdock was typically modest when discussing his achievements, and his following statement should be understood in the context of the year 1808:
The peculiar softness and clearness of this light with its almost unvarying intensity, have brought it into great favour with the work people. And its being free from the inconvenience and danger, resulting from sparks and frequent snuffing of candles, is a circumstance of material importance, as tending to diminish the hazard of fire, to which cotton mills are known to be exposed.
The unique softness and clarity of this light, along with its almost constant brightness, have made it popular among workers. Plus, the absence of the inconveniences and risks that come with sparks and constant candle trimming is crucial because it helps minimize the fire hazards commonly found in cotton mills.
Although this installation in the mill of Phillips and Lee is the first one described by Murdock, in reality it is not the first industrial gas-lighting installation. During the development of gas apparatus at the Soho works and after his luminous display in 1802, he gradually extended gas-lighting to all the principal shops. However, this in a sense was experimental work. Others were applying their knowledge and ingenuity to the problem of making gas-lighting practicable, but Murdock has been aptly termed "the father of gas-lighting." Among the pioneers was Le Bon in France, Becher in Munich, and Winzler or Winsor, a German who was attracted to the possibilities of gas-lighting by an exhibition which Le Bon gave in Paris in 1802. Winsor learned that Le Bon had been granted a patent in Paris in 1799 for making an illuminating gas from wood and tried to obtain the rights for Germany. Being unsuccessful in this, he set about to learn the secrets of Le Bon's process, which he did, perhaps largely owing to an accumulation of information directly from the inventor during the negotiations. Winsor then turned to England as a fertile field for the exploitation of gas-lighting and after conducting experiments in London for some time he made plans to organize the National Heat and Light Co.
Although this installation in the mill of Phillips and Lee is the first one mentioned by Murdock, it’s not actually the first industrial gas-lighting setup. While developing gas equipment at the Soho works and following his impressive display in 1802, he gradually introduced gas-lighting to all the major shops. However, this was more of an experimental phase. Others were also using their knowledge and creativity to make gas-lighting feasible, but Murdock is rightly referred to as "the father of gas-lighting." Among the pioneers were Le Bon in France, Becher in Munich, and Winzler or Winsor, a German who became interested in gas-lighting after seeing an exhibition by Le Bon in Paris in 1802. Winsor discovered that Le Bon received a patent in Paris in 1799 for creating illuminating gas from wood and tried to secure the rights for Germany. When that didn’t work out, he focused on learning the details of Le Bon's process, possibly thanks to a wealth of information directly from the inventor during their discussions. Winsor then looked to England as a promising area for gas-lighting development and, after experimenting in London for a while, he planned to set up the National Heat and Light Co.
Winsor was primarily a promoter, with little or no technical knowledge; for in his claims and advertisements he disregarded facts with a facility possessed only by the ignorant. He boasted of his inventions and discoveries in the most hyperbolical language, which was bound to provoke a controversy. Nevertheless, he was clever and in 1803 he publicly exhibited his plan of lighting by means of coal-gas at the Lyceum Theatre in London. He gave lectures accompanied by interesting and instructive experiments and in this manner attracted the public to his exhibition. All this time he was promoting his company, but his promoting instinct caused his representations to be extravagant and deceptive, which exposed him to the ridicule and suspicion of learned men. His attempt to obtain certain exclusive rights by Act of Parliament failed because of opposition of scientific men toward his claims and of the stand which Murdock justly made in self-protection. These years of controversy yield entertaining literature for those who choose to read it, but unfortunately space does not permit dwelling upon it. The investigations by committees of Parliament also afford amusing side-lights. Throughout all this Murdock appeared modest and conservative and had the support of reputable scientific men, but Winsor maintained extravagant claims.
Winsor was mainly a promoter, lacking any real technical knowledge; in his claims and ads, he ignored the facts with a skill only found in the uninformed. He bragged about his inventions and discoveries in an overly exaggerated manner, which was sure to spark controversy. Still, he was clever, and in 1803, he publicly showcased his plan for lighting using coal gas at the Lyceum Theatre in London. He gave lectures with engaging and informative experiments, attracting the public to his exhibition. During this time, he was promoting his company, but his promotional instinct led to extravagant and misleading statements, which made him the target of ridicule and suspicion from knowledgeable individuals. His attempt to gain exclusive rights through an Act of Parliament failed due to the opposition from scientific experts regarding his claims and the legitimate defense Murdock put up to protect himself. These years of controversy provide entertaining reading for those interested, but unfortunately, there isn't enough space to explore it in depth. The investigations by Parliamentary committees also offer some amusing insights. Throughout all this, Murdock appeared humble and cautious, backed by respected scientists, while Winsor continued to make grand claims.
During one of these investigations Sir Humphrey Davy was examined by a committee from the House of Commons in 1809. He refuted Winsor's claims for a superior coke as a by-product and stated that the production of gas by the distillation of coal had been well known for thirty or forty years and the production of tar as long. He stated that it was the opinion of the Council of the Royal Society that Murdock was the first person to apply coal-gas to lighting in actual practice. As secretary of the Society, Sir Humphrey Davy stated that at the last session it had bestowed the Count Rumford medal upon Murdock for "his economical application of the gas light."
During one of these investigations, Sir Humphrey Davy was questioned by a committee from the House of Commons in 1809. He rejected Winsor's claims about a better coke as a by-product and pointed out that the production of gas from coal distillation had been well known for thirty to forty years, and the production of tar for just as long. He mentioned that the Council of the Royal Society believed Murdock was the first person to use coal gas for lighting in practice. As secretary of the Society, Sir Humphrey Davy noted that in the last session, they had awarded the Count Rumford medal to Murdock for "his economical application of the gas light."
Winsor proceeded to float his company without awaiting the Act of Parliament and in 1807 lighted a street in Pall Mall. Through the opposition which he aroused, and owing to the just claims of priority on the part of Murdock, the bill to incorporate the National Heat and Light Co. with a capital of 200,000 pounds sterling was thrown out. However, he succeeded in 1812 in receiving a charter very much modified in form, for the Chartered Gas Light and Coke Co. which was the forerunner of the present London Gas Light and Coke Co.
Winsor went ahead and launched his company without waiting for the Act of Parliament, and in 1807 he lit a street in Pall Mall. Due to the opposition he faced and Murdock's legitimate claims to priority, the bill to form the National Heat and Light Co. with a capital of 200,000 pounds sterling was rejected. However, in 1812, he was able to secure a charter, although it was significantly altered, for the Chartered Gas Light and Coke Co., which was the predecessor of the current London Gas Light and Coke Co.
The conditions imposed upon this company as presented in an early treatise on gas-lighting (by Accum in 1818) were as follows:
The conditions placed on this company, as outlined in an early paper on gas lighting (by Accum in 1818), were as follows:
The power and authorities granted to this corporate body are very restricted and moderate. The individuals composing it have no exclusive privilege; their charter does not prevent other persons from entering into competition with them. Their operations are confined to the metropolis, where they are bound to furnish not only a stronger and better light to such streets and parishes as chuse to be lighted with gas, but also at a cheaper price than shall be paid for lighting the said streets with oil in the usual manner. The corporation is not permitted to traffic in machinery for manufacturing or conveying the gas into private houses, their capital or joint stock is limited to £200,000, and his Majesty has the power of declaring the gas-light charter void if the company fail to fulfil the terms of it.
The powers and authorities granted to this corporate entity are quite limited and moderate. The members do not have special privileges; their charter does not prevent others from competing with them. Their activities are confined to the city, where they must provide not only a stronger and better light to the streets and neighborhoods that opt to use gas but must also do so at a lower cost than what would typically be paid to light those streets with oil. The corporation is prohibited from dealing in equipment for producing or delivering gas to private homes, their capital or joint stock is capped at £200,000, and the King has the power to void the gas-light charter if the company fails to meet its obligations.
The progress of this early company was slow at first, but with the appointment of Samuel Clegg as engineer in 1813 an era of technical developments began. New stations were built and many improvements were introduced. By improving the methods of purifying the gas a great advance was made. The utility of gas-lighting grew apace as the prejudices disappeared, but for a long time the stock of the company sold at a price far below par. About this time the first gas explosion took place and the members of the Royal Society set a precedent which has lived and thrived: they appointed a committee to make an inquiry. But apparently the inquiry was of some value, for it led "to some useful alterations and new modifications in its apparatus and machinery."
The early progress of this company was slow at first, but when Samuel Clegg was appointed as engineer in 1813, a period of technical advancements began. New stations were constructed, and many improvements were introduced. Advances were made by enhancing the gas purification methods. As prejudices faded, the usefulness of gas lighting grew rapidly, but for a long time, the company’s stock traded at a price significantly below its value. Around this time, the first gas explosion occurred, and the members of the Royal Society set a precedent that has endured: they formed a committee to investigate. It seems the inquiry proved beneficial, as it resulted in "some useful alterations and new modifications in its apparatus and machinery."
Many improvements were being introduced during these years and one of them in 1816 increased the gaseous product from coal by distilling the tar which was obtained during the first distillation. In 1816 Clegg obtained a patent for a horizontal rotating retort; for an apparatus for purifying coal-gas with "cream of lime"; and for a rotative gas-meter.
Many advancements were made during these years, and one of them in 1816 boosted the gas output from coal by distilling the tar collected from the initial distillation. In 1816, Clegg received a patent for a horizontally rotating retort, for a device to purify coal gas using "cream of lime," and for a rotary gas meter.
Before progressing too far, we must mention the early work of William Henry. In 1804 he described publicly a method of producing coal-gas. Besides making experiments on production and utilization of coal-gas for lighting, he devoted his knowledge of chemistry to the analysis of the gas. He also made analytical studies of the relative value of wood, peat, oil, wax, and different kinds of coal for the distillation of gas. His chemical analyses showed to a considerable extent the properties of carbureted hydrogen upon which illuminating value depended. The results of his work were published in various English journals between 1805 and 1825 and they contributed much to the advancement of gas-lighting.
Before going any further, we should mention the early work of William Henry. In 1804, he publicly described a method for producing coal gas. Alongside experiments on creating and using coal gas for lighting, he used his chemistry knowledge to analyze the gas. He also studied the comparative value of wood, peat, oil, wax, and different types of coal for gas distillation. His chemical analyses revealed much about the properties of carbureted hydrogen, which were critical for determining illuminating value. The results of his work were published in various English journals between 1805 and 1825, greatly contributing to the progress of gas lighting.
Although Clegg's original gas-meter was complicated and cumbersome, it proved to be a useful device. In fact, it appears to have been the most original and beneficial invention occasioned by early gas-lighting. Later Samuel Crosley greatly improved it, with the result that it was introduced to a considerable extent; but by no means was it universally adopted. Another improvement made by Clegg at this time was a device which maintained the pressure of gas approximately constant regardless of the pressure in the gasometer or tank. Clegg retired from the service of the gas company in 1817 after a record of accomplishments which glorifies his name in the annals of gas-lighting. Murdock is undoubtedly entitled to the distinction of having been the first person who applied gas-lighting to large private establishments, but Clegg overcame many difficulties and was the first to illuminate a whole town by this means.
Even though Clegg's original gas meter was complex and unwieldy, it turned out to be a valuable device. In fact, it seems to have been the most innovative and helpful invention linked to early gas lighting. Later, Samuel Crosley made significant improvements, leading to its widespread use; however, it wasn't adopted everywhere. Another enhancement made by Clegg at that time was a device that kept gas pressure nearly constant, regardless of the pressure in the gasometer or tank. Clegg left the gas company in 1817 after a impressive record of achievements that honors his name in the history of gas lighting. While Murdock certainly deserves credit for being the first to use gas lighting in large private buildings, Clegg tackled many challenges and was the first to light up an entire town with this technology.
In London in 1817 over 300,000 cubic feet of coal-gas was being manufactured daily, an amount sufficient to operate 76,500 Argand burners yielding 6 candle-power each. Gas-lighting was now exciting great interest and was firmly established. Westminster Bridge was lighted by gas in 1813, and the streets of Westminster during the following year. Gas-lighting became popular in London by 1816 and in the course of the next few years it was adopted by the chief cities and towns in the United Kingdom and on the Continent. It found its way into the houses rather slowly at first, owing to apprehension of the attendant dangers, to the lack of purification of the gas, and to the indifferent service. It was not until the latter half of the nineteenth century that it was generally used in residences.
In London in 1817, over 300,000 cubic feet of coal gas were being produced daily, enough to power 76,500 Argand burners, each providing 6 candle-power. Gas lighting was generating a lot of excitement and was well-established. Westminster Bridge was lit by gas in 1813, and the streets of Westminster followed in the next year. By 1816, gas lighting had become popular in London, and in the following years, it was adopted by major cities and towns across the UK and on the Continent. However, it took some time to make its way into homes due to concerns about safety, the lack of gas purification, and poor service. It wasn't until the latter half of the 19th century that gas became commonly used in residences.
The gas-burner first employed by Murdock received the name "cockspur" from the shape of the flame. This had an illuminating value equivalent to about one candle for each cubic foot of gas burned per hour. The next step was to flatten the welded end of the gas-pipe and to bore a series of holes in a line. From the shape of the flames this form of burner received the name "cockscomb." It was somewhat more efficient than the cockspur burner. The next obvious step was to slit the end of the pipe by means of a fine saw. From this slit the gas was burned as a sheet of flame called the "bats-wing." In 1820 Nielson made a burner which allowed two small jets to collide and thus form a flat flame. The efficiency of this "fish-tail" burner was somewhat higher than that of the earlier ones. Its flame was steadier because it was less influenced by drafts of air. In 1853 Frankland showed an Argand burner consisting of a metal ring containing a series of holes from which jets of gas issued. The glass chimney surrounded these, another chimney, extending somewhat lower, surrounded the whole, and a glass plate closed the bottom. The air to be fed to the gas-jets came downward between the two chimneys and was heated before it reached the burner. This increased the efficiency by reducing the amount of cooling at the burner by the air required for combustion. This improvement was in reality the forerunner of the regenerative lamps which were developed later.
The gas burner first used by Murdock was called the "cockspur" because of the shape of the flame. It had a brightness equivalent to about one candle for each cubic foot of gas burned per hour. The next step was to flatten the welded end of the gas pipe and drill a series of holes in a line. Based on the shape of the flames, this type of burner was named the "cockscomb." It was somewhat more efficient than the cockspur burner. The next logical step was to cut a slit at the end of the pipe with a fine saw. From this slit, the gas burned as a sheet of flame known as the "bats-wing." In 1820, Nielson created a burner that allowed two small jets to collide, resulting in a flat flame. The efficiency of this "fish-tail" burner was slightly higher than that of the earlier models. Its flame was steadier because it was less affected by drafts of air. In 1853, Frankland demonstrated an Argand burner made up of a metal ring containing several holes that emitted jets of gas. A glass chimney surrounded these jets, while a second chimney, extending a bit lower, enclosed everything, and a glass plate sealed the bottom. The air fed to the gas jets came down between the two chimneys and was heated before reaching the burner. This increased efficiency by reducing the cooling effect on the burner caused by the air needed for combustion. This improvement was essentially the precursor to the regenerative lamps that were developed later.
In 1854 Bowditch brought out a regenerative lamp and, owing to the excessive publicity which this lamp obtained, he is generally credited with the inception of the regenerative burner. This principle was adopted in several lamps which came into use later. They were all based upon the principle of heating both the gas and the air required for combustion prior to their reaching the burner. The burner is something like an inverted Argand arranged to produce a circular flame projecting downward with a central cusp. The air- and gas-passages are directly above the flame and are heated by it. In 1879 Friedrich Siemens brought out a lamp of this type which was adapted from a device originally designed for heating purposes, owing to the superior light which was produced. This was the best gas-lamp up to that time. Later, Wenham, Cromartie, and others patented lamps operating on this same principle.
In 1854, Bowditch released a regenerative lamp , and because of the massive publicity this lamp received, he's typically credited with the creation of the regenerative burner. This concept was later adopted in several lamps that became popular. They all operated on the principle of heating both the gas and the air needed for combustion before they reached the burner. The burner resembles an inverted Argand that creates a circular flame projecting downward with a central point. The air and gas passages are located directly above the flame and are heated by it. In 1879, Friedrich Siemens introduced a lamp of this type, adapted from a device originally made for heating, due to the superior light it produced. This was the best gas lamp available at that time. Later, Wenham, Cromartie, and others patented lamps that operated on the same principle.
Murdock early modified the Argand burner to meet the requirements of burning gas and by using the chimney obtained better combustion and a steadier flame than from the open burners. He and others recognized that the temperature of the flame had a considerable effect upon the amount of light emitted and non-conducting material such as steatite was substituted for the metal, which cooled the flame by conducting heat from it. These were the early steps which led finally to the regenerative burner.
Murdock quickly adapted the Argand burner to accommodate gas burning and, by incorporating a chimney, achieved improved combustion and a more stable flame compared to open burners. He and others realized that the flame temperature significantly influenced the amount of light produced, leading to the replacement of metal with non-conductive materials like steatite, which reduced cooling by preventing heat conduction from the flame. These early advancements ultimately paved the way for the regenerative burner.
The increasing efficiency of the various gas-burners is indicated by the following, which are approximately the candle-power based upon equal rates of consumption, namely, one cubic foot of gas per hour:
The rising efficiency of the different gas burners is shown by the following, which are roughly the candle power based on equal consumption rates, specifically, one cubic foot of gas per hour:
Candle-power per cubic foot of gas per hour | |
---|---|
Fish-tail flames, depending upon size | 0.6 to 2.5 |
Argand, depending upon improvements | 2.9 to 3.5 |
Regenerative | 7 to 10 |
It is seen that the possibilities of gas lighting were recognized in several countries, all of which contributed to its development. Some of the earlier accounts have been drawn chiefly from England, but these are intended merely to serve as examples of the difficulties encountered. Doubtless, similar controversies arose in other countries in which pioneers were also nursing gas-lighting to maturity. However, it is certain that much of the early progress of lighting of this character was fathered in England. Gas-lighting was destined to become a thriving industry, and is of such importance in lighting that another chapter is given its modern developments.
It's clear that the potential of gas lighting was recognized in various countries, all of which played a role in its development. Some of the early accounts mainly come from England, but they are just examples of the challenges faced. Undoubtedly, similar debates happened in other countries where innovators were also working to refine gas lighting. However, it's certain that much of the early progress in this type of lighting originated in England. Gas lighting was set to become a booming industry and is so significant in lighting that a whole chapter is dedicated to its modern developments.
VII
THE SCIENCE OF LIGHT-PRODUCTION
In previous chapters much of the historical development of artificial lighting has been presented and several subjects have been traced to the modern period which marks the beginning of an intensive attack by scientists upon the problems pertaining to the production of efficient and adequate light-sources. Many historical events remain to be touched upon in later chapters, but it is necessary at this point for the reader to become acquainted with certain general physical principles in order that he may read with greater interest some of the chapters which follow. It is seen that from a standpoint of artificial lighting, the "dark age" extended well into the nineteenth century. Oil-lamps and gas-lighting began to be seriously developed at the beginning of the last century, but the pioneers gave attention chiefly to mechanical details and somewhat to the chemistry of the fuels. It was not until the science of physics was applied to light-sources that rapid progress was made.
In earlier chapters, we covered much of the historical development of artificial lighting and traced several topics into the modern era, which marks the start of a focused effort by scientists to tackle the challenges of creating efficient and adequate light sources. Many historical events will be discussed in later chapters, but it's important for the reader to understand some general physical principles now so they can engage more deeply with the following chapters. From the perspective of artificial lighting, the "dark age" lasted well into the nineteenth century. Oil lamps and gas lighting started to be significantly developed at the beginning of the last century, but the early innovators mainly focused on mechanical details and, to some extent, the chemistry of the fuels. It wasn't until the science of physics was applied to light sources that significant progress was achieved.
All the light-sources used throughout the ages, and nearly all modern ones, radiate light by virtue of the incandescence of solids or of solid particles and it is an interesting fact that carbon is generally the solid which emits light. This is due to various physical characteristics of carbon, the chief one being its extremely high melting-point. However, most practicable light-sources of the past and present may be divided into two general classes: (1) Those in which solids or solid particles are heated by their own combustion, and (2) those in which the solids are heated by some other means. Some light-sources include both principles and some perhaps cannot be included under either principle without qualification. The luminous flames of burning material such as those of wood-splinters, candles, oil-lamps, and gas-jets, and the glowing embers of burning material appear in the first class; and incandescent gas-mantles, electric filaments, and arc-lamps to some extent are representative of the second class. Certain "flaming" arcs involve both principles, but the light of the firefly, phosphorescence, and incandescent gas in "vacuum" tubes cannot be included in this simplified classification. The status of these will become clear later.
All the light sources used throughout history, as well as nearly all modern ones, generate light through the glowing of solids or solid particles. It's interesting to note that carbon is typically the solid that emits light. This is due to several physical properties of carbon, with the most significant being its extremely high melting point. However, most practical light sources from the past and present can be categorized into two main types: (1) those where solids or solid particles generate heat through their own combustion, and (2) those where the solids are heated by other means. Some light sources incorporate both principles, and others may not fit neatly into either category without further explanation. The bright flames from burning materials like wood splinters, candles, oil lamps, and gas jets fall into the first category, while incandescent gas mantles, electric filaments, and arc lamps are examples of the second category. Certain "flaming" arcs involve both principles, but the light from fireflies, phosphorescence, and incandescent gas in "vacuum" tubes don't fit into this simplified classification. Their status will be clarified later.
It has been seen that flames have been prominent sources of artificial light; and although of low luminous efficiency, they still have much to commend them from the standpoints of portability, convenience, and subdivision. The materials which have been burned for light, whether solid or liquid, are rich in carbon, and the solid particles of carbon by virtue of their incandescence are responsible for the brightness of a flame. A jet of pure hydrogen gas will burn very hot but with so low a brightness as to be barely visible. If solid particles are injected into the flame, much more light usually will be emitted. A gas-burner of the Bunsen type, in which complete combustion is obtained by mixing air in proper proportions with the gas, gives a hot flame which is of a pale blue color. Upon the closing of the orifice through which air is admitted, the flame becomes bright and smoky. The flame is now less hot, as indicated by the presence of smoke or carbon particles, and combustion is not complete. However, it is brighter because the solid particles of carbon in passing upward through the flame become heated to temperatures at which they glow and each becomes a miniature source of light.
It has been observed that flames are significant sources of artificial light; and although they have low luminous efficiency, they still offer benefits in terms of portability, convenience, and versatility. The materials burned for light, whether solid or liquid, are high in carbon, and the solid carbon particles, due to their incandescence, are what make a flame bright. A jet of pure hydrogen gas burns very hot but with such low brightness that it’s barely visible. If solid particles are introduced into the flame, it usually emits much more light. A Bunsen-type gas burner, which achieves complete combustion by mixing air in the right proportions with the gas, produces a hot flame that is pale blue in color. When the air supply is restricted, the flame becomes bright and smoky. The flame is now cooler, as shown by the presence of smoke or carbon particles, and combustion is incomplete. However, it is brighter because the solid carbon particles, as they rise through the flame, get heated to glowing temperatures, making each one a tiny source of light.
A close observer will notice that the flame from a match, a candle, or a gas-jet, is not uniformly bright. The reader may verify this by lighting a match and observing the flame. There is always a bluish or darker portion near the bottom. In this less luminous part the air is combining with the hydrogen of the hydrocarbon which is being vaporized and disintegrated. Even the flame of a candle or of a burning splinter is a miniature gas-plant, for the solid or liquid hydrocarbons are vaporized before being burned. Owing to the incoming colder air at this point, the flame is not hot enough for complete combustion. The unburned carbon particles rise in its draft and become heated to incandescence, thus accounting for the brighter portion. In cases of complete combustion they are eventually oxidized into carbon dioxide before they are able to escape. If a piece of metal be held in the flame, it immediately becomes covered with soot or carbon, because it has reduced the temperature below the point at which the chemical reaction—the uniting of carbon with oxygen—will continue. An ordinary flat gas-flame of the "bats-wing" type may vary in temperature in its central portion from 300°F. at the bottom to about 3000°F. at the top. The central portion lies between two hotter layers in which the vertical variation is not so great. The brightness of the upper portion is due to incandescent carbon formed in the lower part.
A close observer will notice that the flame from a match, candle, or gas burner isn't evenly bright. You can check this by lighting a match and watching the flame. There’s always a bluish or darker part near the bottom. In this less bright area, the air is mixing with the hydrogen from the hydrocarbon that's being vaporized and broken down. Even the flame of a candle or a burning stick is like a miniature gas plant because solids or liquids are turned into vapor before they burn. Because of the incoming cooler air at this point, the flame isn't hot enough for complete combustion. The unburned carbon particles rise in the flame and get heated until they glow, which explains the brighter part. In instances of complete combustion, they are eventually converted into carbon dioxide before they can escape. If you hold a piece of metal in the flame, it quickly becomes covered with soot or carbon because it lowers the temperature below the point where the chemical reaction—carbon combining with oxygen—can continue. A typical flat gas flame of the "bats-wing" type can have a temperature range in its center from about 300°F at the bottom to around 3000°F at the top. The central area is flanked by two hotter layers where the vertical temperature change isn't as significant. The brightness of the upper part comes from incandescent carbon formed in the lower section.
When scientists learned by exploring flames that brightness was due to the radiation of light by incandescent solid matter, the way was open for many experiments. In the early days of gas-lighting investigations were made to determine the relation of illuminating value to the chemical constitution of the gas. The results combined with a knowledge of the necessity for solid carbon in the flame led to improvements in the gas for lighting purposes. Gas rich in hydrocarbons which in turn are rich in carbon is high in illuminating value. Heating-effect depends upon heat-units, so the rating of gas in calories or other heat-units per cubic foot is wholly satisfactory only for gas used for heating. The chemical constitution is a better indicator of illuminating value.
When scientists discovered through studying flames that brightness came from the light emitted by glowing solid materials, it opened the door for many experiments. In the early days of gas lighting, researchers looked into the relationship between the quality of illumination and the chemical makeup of the gas. The findings, along with the understanding that solid carbon was necessary in the flame, led to enhancements in the gas used for lighting. Gas that is rich in hydrocarbons, which in turn are high in carbon, has a high illuminating value. The heating effect is based on heat units, so measuring gas using calories or other heat units per cubic foot is only reliable for gas intended for heating. The chemical makeup is a better indicator of illuminating value.
As scientific knowledge increased, efforts were made to get solid matter into the flames of light-sources. Instead of confining efforts to the carbon content of the gas, solid materials were actually placed in the flame, and in this manner various incandescent burners were developed. A piece of lime placed in a hydrogen flame or that of a Bunsen burner is seen to become hot and to glow brilliantly. By producing a hotter flame by means of the blowpipe, in which hydrogen and oxygen are consumed, the piece of lime was raised to a higher temperature and a more intense light was obtained. In Paris there was a serious attempt at street-lighting by the use of buttons of zirconia heated in an oxygen-coal-gas flame, but it proved unsuccessful owing to the rapid deterioration of the buttons. This was the line of experimentation which led to the development of the lime-light. The incandescent burner was widely employed, and until the use of electricity became common the lime-light was the mainstay for the stage and for the projection of lantern slides. It is in use even to-day for some purposes. The origin of the phrase "in the lime-light" is obvious. The luminous intensity of the oxyhydrogen lime-light as used in practice was generally from 200 to 400 candle-power. The light decreases rapidly as the burner is used, if a new surface of lime is not presented to the flame from time to time. At the high temperatures the lime is somewhat volatile and the surface seems to change in radiating power. Zirconium oxide has been found to serve better than lime.
As scientific knowledge grew, efforts were made to introduce solid materials into flame sources. Instead of just focusing on the carbon content of the gas, solid substances were actually placed in the flames, leading to the development of various incandescent burners. A piece of lime positioned in a hydrogen flame or a Bunsen burner heats up and glows bright. By creating a hotter flame using a blowpipe that mixes hydrogen and oxygen, the lime can reach an even higher temperature, producing a more intense light. In Paris, there was a serious attempt at street lighting using zirconia buttons heated in an oxygen-coal-gas flame, but it failed because the buttons deteriorated quickly. This experimentation line ultimately led to the creation of the lime-light. The incandescent burner was widely used, and until electricity became common, the lime-light was essential for stage lighting and projecting lantern slides. It's still used today for certain applications. The origin of the phrase "in the lime-light" is clear. The luminous intensity of the oxyhydrogen lime-light in practice was usually between 200 and 400 candle-power. The light diminishes rapidly during use unless a new surface of lime is exposed to the flame regularly. At high temperatures, the lime becomes somewhat volatile and its surface seems to change in radiating efficiency. Zirconium oxide has proven to be more effective than lime.
Improvements were made in gas-burners in order to obtain hotter flames into which solid matter could be introduced to obtain bright light. Many materials were used, but obviously they were limited to those of a fairly high melting-point. Lime, magnesia, zirconia, and similar oxides were used successfully. If the reader would care to try an experiment in verification of this simple principle, let him take a piece of magnesium ribbon such as is used in lighting for photography and ignite it in a Bunsen flame. If it is held carefully while burning, a ribbon of ash (magnesia) will be obtained intact. Placing this in the faintly luminous flame, he will be surprised at the brilliance of its incandescence when it has become heated. The simple experiment indicates the possibilities of light-production in this direction. Naturally, metals of high melting-point such as platinum were tried and a network of platinum wire, in reality a platinum mantle, came into practical use in about 1880. The town of Nantes was lighted by gas-burners using these platinum-gauze mantles, but the mantles were unsuccessful owing to their rapid deterioration. This line of experimentation finally bore fruit of immense value for from it the gas-mantle evolved.
Improvements were made in gas burners to produce hotter flames into which solid materials could be introduced to create bright light. Many materials were tried, but they had to be those with a relatively high melting point. Lime, magnesia, zirconia, and other similar oxides were used successfully. If the reader wants to try an experiment to verify this simple principle, take a piece of magnesium ribbon, like the kind used for photography lighting, and ignite it in a Bunsen flame. If it's held carefully while burning, it will produce a ribbon of ash (magnesia) that remains intact. When you place this in the faintly luminous flame, you will be surprised by the brilliance of its incandescence when it gets heated. The simple experiment shows the potential for light production in this direction. Naturally, metals with high melting points, such as platinum, were also tested, and a network of platinum wire, which is essentially a platinum mantle, became practically useful around 1880. The town of Nantes was lit using gas burners with these platinum gauze mantles, but the mantles failed due to their rapid deterioration. This line of experimentation ultimately led to the development of the gas mantle, which proved to be immensely valuable.
A group of so-called "rare-earths," among which are zirconia, thoria, ceria, erbia, and yttria (these are oxides of zirconium, etc.) possess a number of interesting chemical properties some of which have been utilized to advantage in the development of modern artificial light. They are white or yellowish-white oxides of a highly refractory character found in certain rare minerals. Most of them are very brilliant when heated to a high temperature. This latter feature is easily explained if the nature of light and the radiating properties of substances are considered. Suppose pieces of different substances, for example, glass and lime, are heated in a Bunsen flame to the same temperature which is sufficiently great to cause both of them to glow. Notwithstanding the identical conditions of heating, the glass will be only faintly luminous, while the piece of lime will glow brilliantly. The former is a poor radiator; furthermore, the lime radiates a relatively greater percentage of its total energy in the form of luminous energy.
A group of so-called "rare earths," including zirconia, thoria, ceria, erbia, and yttria (which are oxides of zirconium, etc.), have several interesting chemical properties that have been effectively used in the development of modern artificial light. They are white or yellowish-white oxides that are highly heat-resistant and found in certain rare minerals. Most of them shine brightly when heated to high temperatures. This characteristic is easy to explain when considering the nature of light and how different substances radiate energy. For example, if you heat pieces of different materials, like glass and lime, in a Bunsen flame until they both glow, you'll find that, even under the same heating conditions, the glass will only emit a faint light, while the lime will glow brightly. The glass is a poor radiator, and in addition, the lime releases a relatively larger percentage of its total energy as light.
The latter point will become clearer if the reader will refresh his memory regarding the nature of light. Any luminous source such as the sun, a candle flame, or an incandescent lamp is sending forth electromagnetic waves not unlike those used in wireless telegraphy excepting that they are of much shorter wave-length. The eye is capable of recording some of these waves as light just as a receiving station is tuned to record a range of wave-lengths of electromagnetic energy. The electromagnetic waves sent forth by a light-source like the sun are not all visible, that is, all of them do not arouse a sensation of light. Those that do comprise the visible spectrum and the different wave-lengths of visible radiant energy manifest themselves by arousing the sensations of the various spectral colors. The radiant energy of shortest wave-length perceptible by the visual apparatus excites the sensation of violet and the longest ones the sensation of deep red. Between these two extremes of the visible spectrum, the chief spectral colors are blue, green, yellow, orange, and red in the order of increasing wave-lengths. Electromagnetic energy radiated by a light-source in waves of too great wave-length to be perceived by the eye as light is termed as a class "infra-red radiant energy." Those too short to be perceived as light are termed as a class "ultraviolet radiant energy." A solid body at a high temperature emits electro-magnetic energy of all wave-lengths, from the shortest ultra-violet to the longest infra-red.
The latter point will become clearer if the reader refreshes their memory about the nature of light. Any light source, like the sun, a candle flame, or an incandescent lamp, is emitting electromagnetic waves similar to those used in wireless telegraphy, except these waves have much shorter wavelengths. The eye can detect some of these waves as light, just like a receiving station is set up to capture a specific range of wavelengths of electromagnetic energy. The electromagnetic waves emitted by a light source like the sun aren't all visible; that is, not all of them create the sensation of light. Those that do make up the visible spectrum, and the different wavelengths of visible radiant energy are perceived as various spectral colors. The shortest wavelengths that can be seen create the sensation of violet, while the longest produce the sensation of deep red. Between these two extremes of the visible spectrum, the main spectral colors are blue, green, yellow, orange, and red, in order of increasing wavelengths. Electromagnetic energy emitted by a light source in wavelengths too long to be seen as light is classified as "infrared radiant energy." Those wavelengths that are too short to be perceived as light are classified as "ultraviolet radiant energy." A solid object at a high temperature emits electromagnetic energy across all wavelengths, from the shortest ultraviolet to the longest infrared.
Another complication arises in the variation in visibility or luminosity of energy of wave-lengths within the range of the visible spectrum. Obviously, no amount of energy incapable of exciting the sensation of light will be visible. The energy of those wave-lengths near the ends of the visible spectrum will be inefficient in producing light. That energy which excites the sensation of yellow-green produces the greatest luminosity per unit of energy and is the most efficient light. The visibility or luminous efficiency of radiant energy may be ranged approximately in this manner according to the colors aroused: yellow-green, yellow, green, orange, blue-green, red, blue, deep red, violet.
Another complication comes from the difference in visibility or brightness of energies at various wavelengths within the visible spectrum. Clearly, any amount of energy that can't trigger the sensation of light won't be visible. The energy at the wavelengths near the ends of the visible spectrum is not effective in producing light. The energy that triggers the sensation of yellow-green creates the highest brightness per unit of energy and is the most efficient light. The visibility or luminous efficiency of radiant energy can be roughly ranked in this order based on the colors evoked: yellow-green, yellow, green, orange, blue-green, red, blue, deep red, violet.
Newton, an English scientist, first described the discovery of the visible spectrum and this is of such fundamental importance in the science of light that the first paragraph of his original paper in the "Transactions of the Royal Society of London" is quoted as follows:
Newton, an English scientist, was the first to describe the discovery of the visible spectrum, which is so fundamentally important to the science of light that the opening paragraph of his original paper in the "Transactions of the Royal Society of London" is quoted as follows:
In the Year 1666 (at which time I applied my self to the Grinding of Optick Glasses of other Figures than Spherical) I procured me a Triangular Glass-Prism, to try therewith the celebrated Phaenomena of Colours. And in order thereto, having darkened my Chamber, and made a small Hole in my Window-Shuts, to let in a convenient Quantity of the Sun's Light, I placed my Prism at its Entrance, that it might be thereby refracted to the opposite Wall. It was at first a very pleasing Divertisement, to view the vivid and intense Colours produced thereby; but after a while applying my self to consider them more circumspectly, I became surprised to see them in an oblong Form; which, according to the receiv'd Law of Refractions, I expected should have been circular. They were terminated at the Sides with streight Lines, but at the Ends the Decay of Light was so gradual, that it was difficult to determine justly what was the Figure, yet they seemed Semicircular.
In 1666 (when I was focused on grinding optical glasses in shapes other than spherical), I got a triangular glass prism to experiment with the famous color phenomena. To do this, I darkened my room and made a small hole in my window shutters to let in the right amount of sunlight. I placed my prism at the opening so the light would be refracted onto the opposite wall. At first, it was a delightful experience to see the bright, intense colors it produced; but after a while, as I examined them more closely, I was surprised to see them in an elongated shape, which I expected to be circular according to the accepted laws of refraction. The edges were defined by straight lines, but at the ends, the fading of light was so gradual that it was hard to determine the exact shape; still, they looked semicircular.
Now to return to the peculiar property of rare-earth oxides—namely, their unusual brilliance when heated in a flame—it is easy to understand the reason for this. For example, when a number of substances are heated to the same temperature they may radiate the same amount of energy and still differ considerably in brightness. Many substances are "selective" in their absorbing and radiating properties. One may radiate more luminous energy and less infra-red energy, and for another the reverse may be true. The former would appear brighter than the latter. The scientific worker in light-production has been searching for such "selective" radiators whose other properties are satisfactory. The rare-earths possess the property of selectivity and are fortunately highly refractory. Welsbach used these in his mantle, whose efficiency is due partly to this selective property. Recent work indicates that much higher efficiencies of light-production are still attainable by the principles involved in the gas-mantle.
Now, let's go back to the unique quality of rare-earth oxides—specifically, their striking brilliance when heated in a flame. It's easy to see why this happens. For instance, when different substances are heated to the same temperature, they can emit the same amount of energy but still look quite different in brightness. Many substances are "selective" in how they absorb and emit energy. One might emit more visible light and less infrared energy, while another might do the opposite. The first would look brighter than the second. Scientists working on light production have been looking for such "selective" radiators that also have good overall properties. The rare-earths have the property of selectivity and are also very durable. Welsbach used these in his mantle, and its efficiency comes partly from this selective property. Recent research shows that we can achieve even higher efficiencies in light production using the principles found in the gas mantle.
Turning again to flames, another interesting physical phenomenon is seen on placing solutions of different chemical salts in the flame. For example, if a piece of asbestos is soaked in sodium chloride (common salt) and is placed in a Bunsen flame, the pale-blue flame suddenly becomes luminous and of a yellow color. If this is repeated with other salts, a characteristic color will be noted in each case. The yellow flame is characteristic of sodium and if it is examined by means of a spectroscope, a brilliant yellow line (in fact, a double line) will be seen. This forms the basis of spectrum analysis as applied in chemistry.
Turning again to flames, another interesting physical phenomenon can be observed when different chemical salt solutions are placed in the flame. For instance, if a piece of asbestos is soaked in sodium chloride (table salt) and put into a Bunsen flame, the pale-blue flame suddenly becomes bright and turns yellow. If this is repeated with other salts, each will produce a distinct color. The yellow flame is typical of sodium, and if examined with a spectroscope, a brilliant yellow line (in fact, a double line) will be visible. This is the foundation of spectrum analysis used in chemistry.
Every element has its characteristic spectrum consisting usually of lines, but the complexity varies with the elements. The spectra of elements also exhibit lines in the ultra-violet region which may be studied with a photographic plate, with a photo-electric cell, and by other means. Their spectral lines or bands also extend into the infra-red region and here they are studied by means of the bolometer or other apparatus for detecting radiant energy by the heat which it produces upon being absorbed. Spectrum analysis is far more sensitive than the finest weighing balance, for if a grain of salt be dissolved in a barrel of water and an asbestos strip be soaked in the water and held in a Bunsen flame, the yellow color characteristic of sodium will be detectable. A wonderful example of the possibilities of this method is the discovery of helium in the sun before it was found on earth! Its spectral lines were detected in the sun's spectrum and could not be accounted for by any known element. However, it should be stated that the spectrum of an element differs generally with the manner obtained. The electric spark, the arc, the electric discharge in a vacuum tube, and the flame are the means usually employed.
Every element has a unique spectrum that usually consists of lines, but the complexity varies among different elements. The spectra of elements also show lines in the ultraviolet range, which can be studied using a photographic plate, a photoelectric cell, and other methods. Their spectral lines or bands also extend into the infrared range, where they are analyzed using a bolometer or other devices that detect radiant energy by measuring the heat it produces when absorbed. Spectrum analysis is much more sensitive than the best weighing scales; for example, if you dissolve a grain of salt in a barrel of water and soak an asbestos strip in that water before holding it in a Bunsen flame, the yellow color typical of sodium will be visible. A remarkable illustration of this method's potential is the discovery of helium in the sun long before it was found on Earth! Its spectral lines were identified in the sun's spectrum and couldn't be explained by any known element. However, it's important to note that the spectrum of an element can vary depending on how it is obtained. The electric spark, the arc, the electric discharge in a vacuum tube, and the flame are the common methods used.
The spectrum has been dwelt upon at some length because it is of great importance in light-production and probably will figure strongly in future developments. Although in lighting little use has been made of the injection of chemical salts into ordinary flames, it appears certain that such developments would have risen if electric illuminants had not entered the field. However, the principle has been applied with great success in arc-lamps. In the first arc-lamps plain carbon electrodes were used, but in some of the latest carbon-arcs, electrodes of carbon impregnated with various salts are employed. For example, calcium fluoride gives a brilliant yellow light when used in the carbons of the "flame" arc. These are described in detail later.
The spectrum has been discussed in detail because it's very important for light production and will likely play a significant role in future advancements. While chemical salts have rarely been added to regular flames for lighting, it's clear that such innovations would have emerged if electric lights hadn't taken over. However, this principle has been very successful in arc lamps. Early arc lamps used plain carbon electrodes, but some of the latest carbon arcs utilize electrodes made of carbon infused with various salts. For instance, calcium fluoride produces a bright yellow light when included in the carbons of the "flame" arc. These are described in detail later.
Following this principle of light-production the vacuum tubes were developed. Crookes studied the light from various gases by enclosing them in a tube which was pumped out until a low vacuum was produced. On connecting a high voltage to electrodes in each end, an electrical discharge passed through the residual gas making it luminous. The different gases show their characteristic spectra and their desirability as light-producers is at once evident.
Following this principle of light production, the vacuum tubes were created. Crookes investigated the light emitted by different gases by sealing them in a tube that was evacuated until a low vacuum was achieved. When a high voltage was applied to electrodes at each end, an electrical discharge passed through the remaining gas, causing it to glow. The various gases displayed their unique spectra, clearly demonstrating their effectiveness as light sources.
However, the most general principle of light-production at the present time is the radiation of bodies by virtue of their temperature. If a piece of wire be heated by electricity, it will become very hot before it becomes luminous. At this temperature it is emitting only invisible infra-red energy and has an efficiency of zero as a producer of light. As it becomes hotter it begins to appear red, but as its temperature is raised it appears orange, until if it could be heated to the temperature of the sun, about 10,000°F., it would appear white. All this time its luminous efficiency is increasing, because it is radiating not only an increasing percentage of visible radiant energy but an increasing amount of the most effective luminous energy. But even when it appears white, a large amount of the energy which it radiates is invisible infra-red and ultra-violet, which are ineffective in producing light, so at best the substance at this high temperature is inefficient as a light-producer.
However, the most general principle of light production today is that objects emit light based on their temperature. If you heat a piece of wire with electricity, it will get very hot before it starts to glow. At this point, it only emits invisible infrared energy and has zero efficiency as a light source. As it gets hotter, it starts to look red, and then orange as the temperature continues to rise, until, if it could reach the temperature of the sun, around 10,000°F, it would appear white. Throughout this process, its luminous efficiency goes up because it emits a larger percentage of visible radiant energy as well as more of the most effective luminous energy. However, even when it looks white, a significant amount of the energy it radiates is invisible infrared and ultraviolet, which don't effectively produce light, meaning that at best, the substance is inefficient at generating light at this high temperature.
In this branch of the science of light-production substances are sought not only for their high melting-point, but for their ability to radiate selectively as much visible energy as possible and of the most luminous character. However, at best the present method of utilizing the temperature radiation of hot bodies has limitations.
In this branch of the science of light production, substances are sought not only for their high melting points but also for their ability to emit as much visible energy as possible and of the brightest kind. However, the current method of using the temperature radiation of hot bodies has its limitations.
The luminous efficiencies of light-sources to-day are still very low, but great advances have been made in the past half-century. There must be some radical departures if the efficiency of light-production is to reach a much higher figure. A good deal has been said of the firefly and of phosphorescence. These light-sources appear to emit only visible energy and, therefore, are efficient as radiators of luminous radiant energy. But much remains to be unearthed concerning them before they will be generally applicable to lighting. If ultra-violet radiation is allowed to impinge upon a phosphorescent material, it will glow with a considerable brightness but will be cool to the touch. A substance of the same brightness by virtue of its temperature would be hot; hence phosphorescence is said to be "cold" light.
The light efficiencies of sources today are still quite low, but there have been significant improvements over the last fifty years. We need some major changes if we want light production efficiency to reach a much higher level. A lot has been discussed about fireflies and phosphorescence. These light sources seem to only emit visible energy, making them efficient at radiating light energy. However, there's still a lot to discover about them before they can be widely used for lighting. When ultraviolet radiation hits a phosphorescent material, it will glow brightly but stay cool to the touch. A substance that is just as bright due to its temperature would be hot, which is why phosphorescence is called "cold" light.
An acquaintance with certain terms is necessary if the reader is to understand certain parts of the text. The early candle gradually became a standard, and uniform candles are still satisfactory standards where high accuracy is not required. Their luminous intensity and illuminating value became units just as the foot was arbitrarily adopted as a unit of length. The intensity of other light-sources was represented in terms of the number of candles or fraction of a candle which gave the same amount of light. But the luminous intensity of the candle was taken only in the horizontal direction. In the same manner the luminous intensities of light-sources until a short time ago were expressed in candles as measured in a certain direction. Incandescent lamps were rated in terms of mean horizontal candles, which would be satisfactory if the luminous intensity were the same in all directions, but it is not. Therefore, the candle-power in one direction does not give a measure of the total light-output.
An understanding of certain terms is necessary for the reader to grasp specific parts of the text. The early candle gradually became a standard, and uniform candles are still effective standards where high accuracy isn't essential. Their luminous intensity and illuminating value became units just like the foot was randomly chosen as a unit of length. The intensity of other light sources was expressed in terms of the number of candles or fractions of a candle that produced the same amount of light. However, the luminous intensity of the candle was measured only in the horizontal direction. Likewise, the luminous intensities of light sources until recently were expressed in candles measured in a particular direction. Incandescent lamps were rated in terms of mean horizontal candles, which would work well if the luminous intensity were the same in all directions, but it isn't. As a result, the candle-power in one direction doesn't provide a measure of the total light output.
If a source of light has a luminous intensity of one candle in all directions, the illumination at a distance of one foot in any direction is said to be a foot-candle. This is the unit of illumination intensity. A lumen is the quantity of light which falls on one square foot if the intensity of illumination is one foot-candle. It is seen that the area of a sphere with a radius of one foot is 4p or 12.57 square feet; therefore, a light-source having a luminous intensity of one candle in all directions emits 12.57 lumens. This is the satisfactory unit, for it measures total quantity of light, and luminous efficiencies may be expressed in terms of lumens per watt, lumens per cubic foot of gas per hour, etc.
If a light source has a brightness of one candle in all directions, the light received at a distance of one foot in any direction is called a foot-candle. This is the unit used to measure the intensity of illumination. A lumen is the amount of light that hits one square foot when the illumination is one foot-candle. It can be noted that the surface area of a sphere with a radius of one foot is 4π or 12.57 square feet; therefore, a light source with a brightness of one candle in all directions emits 12.57 lumens. This is the preferred unit since it measures the total amount of light, and light efficiencies can be expressed in terms of lumens per watt, lumens per cubic foot of gas per hour, and so on.
Of course, the efficiencies of light-sources are usually of interest to the consumer if they are expressed in terms of cost. But from a practical point of view there are many elements which combine to make another important factor, namely, satisfactoriness. Therefore, the efficiency of artificial lighting from the standpoint of the consumer should be the ratio of satisfactoriness to cost. However, the scientist is interested chiefly in the efficiency of the light-source which may be expressed in lumens per watt, or the amount of light obtained from a given rate of consumption or of emission of energy. This method of rating light-sources penalizes those radiating considerable energy which does not produce the sensation of light or which at best is of wave-lengths that are inefficient in this respect. That radiant energy which is wholly of a wave-length of maximum visibility, or, in other words, excites the sensation of yellow-green, is the most efficient in producing luminous sensation. Of course, no illuminants are available which approach this theoretical ideal and it is not likely that this would be a practical ideal. Under monochromatic yellow-green light the magical drapery of color would disappear and the surroundings would be a monochrome of shades of this hue. Having no colors with which to contrast this color, the world would be colorless. This should be obvious when it is considered that an object which is red under an illuminant containing all colors such as sunlight would be black or dark gray under monochromatic yellow-green light. The red under present conditions is kept alive by contrast with other colors, because the latter live by virtue of the fact that most of our present illuminants contain their hues. It is assumed that the reader knows that a red object, for example, appears red because it reflects (or transmits) red rays and absorbs the other rays in the illuminant. In other words, color is due to selective absorption reflection, or transmission.
Of course, consumers are typically interested in the efficiency of light sources when it comes to cost. But from a practical perspective, there are many factors that contribute to another important element, which is satisfaction. Therefore, the efficiency of artificial lighting for the consumer should be the ratio of satisfaction to cost. However, scientists mainly focus on the efficiency of the light source, which can be measured in lumens per watt, or the amount of light produced for a certain amount of energy used. This way of rating light sources tends to disadvantage those that emit a lot of energy but don’t create the sensation of light, or that emit wavelengths that are not very effective in this regard. The radiant energy that is solely at the wavelength of maximum visibility, or that primarily triggers the sensation of yellow-green, is the most effective for producing visible light. Of course, no lighting options currently exist that get close to this theoretical ideal, and it’s unlikely that it would be practical even if they did. Under a monochromatic yellow-green light, the beautiful variety of colors would vanish, and everything would appear in different shades of that one color. Without other colors to contrast with yellow-green, the world would seem colorless. This is evident when you consider that an object that is red under a full-spectrum light source, like sunlight, would appear black or dark gray under monochromatic yellow-green lighting. The red color, in the current lighting conditions, is maintained by the contrast with other colors, as those colors exist because most of our common light sources include their hues. It’s understood that a red object, for example, looks red because it reflects (or transmits) red light and absorbs the other wavelengths in the light source. In other words, color is the result of selective absorption, reflection, or transmission.
Perhaps the ideal illuminant, which is most generally satisfactory for general activities, is a white light corresponding to noon sunlight. If this is chosen as the scientific ideal, the illuminants of the present time are much more "efficient" than if the most efficient light is the ideal.
Perhaps the best kind of light, which works well for most activities, is a white light similar to sunlight at noon. If we consider this as the ideal light, then the lights we have today are much more "efficient" than if the most efficient light were our standard.
The luminous efficiency of the radiant energy most efficient in producing the sensation of light (yellow-green) is about 625 lumens per watt. That is, if energy of this wave-length alone were radiated by a hypothetical light-source, each watt would produce 625 lumens. The luminous efficiency of the most efficient white light is about 265 lumens per watt; in other words, if a hypothetical light-source radiated energy of only the visible wave-lengths and in proportions to produce the sensation of white, each watt would produce 265 lumens. If such a white light were obtained by pure temperature radiation—that is, by a normal radiator at a temperature of 10,000°F., which is impracticable at present—the luminous efficiency would be about 100 lumens per watt. The normal radiator which emits energy by virtue of its temperature without selectively radiating more or less energy in any part of the spectrum than indicated by the theoretical radiation laws is called a "black-body" or normal radiator. Modern illuminants have luminous efficiencies ranging from 5 to 30 lumens per watt, so it is seen that much is to be done before the limiting efficiencies are reached.
The luminous efficiency of the radiant energy that produces the most effective sensation of light (yellow-green) is about 625 lumens per watt. This means that if a hypothetical light source emitted energy at this wavelength, each watt would generate 625 lumens. The luminous efficiency of the best white light is around 265 lumens per watt; in other words, if a hypothetical light source emitted energy only at visible wavelengths and in proportions to create the sensation of white light, each watt would yield 265 lumens. If such white light were produced through pure temperature radiation—that is, by a normal radiator at a temperature of 10,000°F, which is not feasible at this time—the luminous efficiency would be about 100 lumens per watt. A normal radiator that emits energy based on its temperature without selectively radiating more or less energy in any part of the spectrum than what the theoretical radiation laws suggest is called a "black-body" or normal radiator. Modern light sources have luminous efficiencies ranging from 5 to 30 lumens per watt, demonstrating that there is still much to improve before reaching the maximum efficiencies.
The amount of light obtained from various gas-burners for each cubic foot of gas consumed per hour varies for open gas-flames from 5 to 30 lumens; for Argand burners from 35 to 40 lumens; for regenerative lamps from 50 to 75 lumens; and for gas-mantles from 200 to 250 lumens.
The amount of light produced by different gas burners for each cubic foot of gas used per hour ranges from 5 to 30 lumens for open gas flames; 35 to 40 lumens for Argand burners; 50 to 75 lumens for regenerative lamps; and 200 to 250 lumens for gas mantles.
In the development of light-sources, of course, any harmful effects of gases formed by burning or chemical action must be avoided. Some of the fumes from arcs are harmful, but no commercial arc appears to be dangerous when used as it is intended to be used. Gas-burners rob the atmosphere of oxygen and vitiate it with gases, which, however, are harmless if combustion is complete. That adequate ventilation is necessary where oxygen is being consumed is evident from the data presented by authorities on hygiene. A standard candle when burning vitiates the air in a room almost as much as an adult person. An ordinary kerosene lamp vitiates the atmosphere as much as a half-dozen persons. An ordinary single mantle burner causes as much vitiation as two or three persons.
In developing light sources, it’s crucial to avoid any harmful effects from gases produced by burning or chemical reactions. Some fumes from arc lights can be harmful, but no commercial arc light seems to pose a danger when used as intended. Gas burners deplete the atmosphere of oxygen and pollute it with gases that are harmless if the combustion process is complete. It's clear from health experts' data that proper ventilation is necessary whenever oxygen is being consumed. A standard candle reduces air quality in a room nearly as much as one adult person. A regular kerosene lamp impacts the atmosphere like six people. A typical single mantle burner affects the air quality like two or three people.
In order to obtain a bird's-eye view of progress in light-production, the following table of relative luminous efficiencies of several light-sources is given in round numbers. These efficiencies are in terms of the most efficient (yellow-green) light.
In order to get an overview of progress in light production, the following table shows the relative luminous efficiencies of various light sources in round numbers. These efficiencies are compared to the most efficient (yellow-green) light.
The luminous efficiency of a light-source is distinguished from that of a lamp. The former is the ratio of the light produced to the amount of energy radiated by the light-source. The latter is the ratio of the light produced to the total amount of energy consumed by the device. In other words, the luminous efficiency of a lamp is less than that of the light-source because the consumption of energy in other parts of the lamp besides the light-source are taken into account. These additional losses are appreciable in the mechanisms of arc-lamps but are almost negligible in vacuum incandescent filament lamps. They are unknown for the firefly, so that its luminous efficiency only as a light-source can be determined. Its efficiency as a lighting-plant may be and perhaps is rather low.
The luminous efficiency of a light source is different from that of a lamp. The former is the ratio of light produced to the energy emitted by the light source. The latter is the ratio of light produced to the total energy consumed by the device. In other words, the luminous efficiency of a lamp is lower than that of the light source because it also considers the energy consumption in parts of the lamp beyond the light source. These extra losses are significant in arc lamps but are almost negligible in vacuum incandescent filament lamps. For fireflies, these details are unknown, so we can only determine their luminous efficiency as a light source. Its efficiency as a lighting plant might be, and probably is, quite low.
VIII
MODERN GAS-LIGHTING
As has been seen, the lighting industry, as a public service, was born in London about a century ago and companies to serve the public were organized on the Continent shortly after. From this early beginning gas-light remained for a long time the only illuminant supplied by a public-service company. It has been seen that throughout the ages little advance was made in lighting until oil-lamps were improved by Argand in the eighteenth century. Candles and open-flame oil-lamps were in use when the Pyramids were built and these were common until the approach of the nineteenth century. In fact, several decades passed after the first gas-lighting was installed before this form of lighting began to displace the improved oil-lamps and candles. It was not until about 1850 that it began to invade the homes of the middle and poorer classes. During the first half of the nineteenth century the total light in an average home was less than is now obtained from a single light-source used in residences; still, the total cost of lighting a residence has decreased considerably. If the social and industrial activities of mankind are visualized for these various periods in parallel with the development of artificial lighting, a close relation is evident. Did artificial light advance merely hand in hand with science, invention, commerce, and industry, or did it illuminate the pathway?
As we've seen, the lighting industry, as a public service, started in London about a hundred years ago, and companies to serve the public were set up in Europe shortly after. In the beginning, gas lighting was the only type of illumination provided by a public-service company. Historically, there was little progress in lighting until Argand improved oil lamps in the eighteenth century. Candles and open-flame oil lamps were used when the Pyramids were built and remained common until the late nineteenth century. In fact, several decades went by after the first gas lighting was installed before it began to replace the improved oil lamps and candles. It wasn't until around 1850 that it started to become common in the homes of the middle and lower classes. During the first half of the nineteenth century, the total amount of light in an average home was less than what you would get from a single light source today; however, the overall cost of lighting a home has decreased significantly. If we look at the social and industrial activities of people during these times alongside the evolution of artificial lighting, a clear connection emerges. Did artificial light progress simply alongside science, invention, commerce, and industry, or did it actually light the way forward?
Although gas-lighting was born in England it soon began to receive attention elsewhere. In 1815 the first attempt to provide a gas-works in America was made in Philadelphia; but progress was slow, with the result that Baltimore and New York led in the erection of gas-works. There are on record many protests against proposals which meant progress in lighting. These are amusing now, but they indicate the inertia of the people in such matters. When Bollman was projecting a plan for lighting Philadelphia by means of piped gas, a group of prominent citizens submitted a protest in 1833 which aimed to show that the consequences of the use of gas were appalling. But this protest failed and in 1835 a gas-plant was founded in Philadelphia. Thus gas-lighting, which to Sir Walter Scott was a "pestilential innovation" projected by a madman, weathered its early difficulties and grew to be a mighty industry. Continued improvements and increasing output not only altered the course of civilization by increased and adequate lighting but they reduced the cost of lighting over the span of the nineteenth century to a small fraction of its initial cost.
Although gas lighting started in England, it quickly gained attention in other places. In 1815, the first attempt to establish a gas plant in America was made in Philadelphia; however, progress was slow, leading to Baltimore and New York taking the lead in building gas plants. Many protests are on record against proposals that aimed to improve lighting. These are funny now, but they show how resistant people were to change. When Bollman was planning to light Philadelphia with piped gas, a group of prominent citizens submitted a protest in 1833 claiming that the consequences of using gas were terrifying. But this protest failed, and in 1835, a gas plant was established in Philadelphia. Thus, gas lighting, which Sir Walter Scott described as a "pestilential innovation" created by a madman, overcame its early challenges and became a significant industry. Ongoing improvements and increased production not only changed the course of civilization through better and adequate lighting but also reduced the cost of lighting to a small fraction of its original price over the nineteenth century.
Think of the city of Philadelphia in 1800, with a population of about fifty thousand, dependent for its lighting wholly upon candles and oil-lamps! Washington's birthday anniversary was celebrated in 1817 with a grand ball attended by five hundred of the élite. An old report of the occasion states that the room was lighted by two thousand wax-candles. The cost of this lighting was a hundred times the cost of as much light for a similar occasion at the present time. Can one imagine the present complex activities of a city like Philadelphia with nearly two million inhabitants to exist under the lighting conditions of a century ago? To-day there are more than fifty thousand street lamps in the city—one for each inhabitant of a century ago. Of these street lamps about twenty-five thousand burn gas. This single instance is representative of gas-lighting which initiated the "light age" and nursed it through the vicissitudes of youth. The consumption of gas has grown in the United States during this time to three billion cubic feet per day. For strictly illuminating purposes in 1910 nearly one hundred billion cubic feet were used. This country has been blessed with large supplies of natural gas; but as this fails new oil-fields are constantly being discovered, so that as far as raw materials are concerned the future of gas-lighting is assured for a long time to come.
Think about Philadelphia in 1800, with a population of around fifty thousand, relying completely on candles and oil lamps for lighting! Washington's birthday was celebrated in 1817 with a big ball attended by five hundred elite guests. An old report from the event says the room was lit by two thousand wax candles. The cost of this lighting was a hundred times more than what it would cost for the same amount of light today. Can anyone imagine a bustling city like Philadelphia, now home to nearly two million people, existing under the lighting conditions from a century ago? Nowadays, there are over fifty thousand street lamps in the city—one for every resident back then. About twenty-five thousand of these street lamps use gas. This is just one example of gas lighting that marked the beginning of the "light age" and helped it develop through its early challenges. Gas consumption in the United States has grown to three billion cubic feet per day. For lighting alone, nearly one hundred billion cubic feet were used in 1910. This country has been fortunate to have abundant natural gas supplies; however, as those diminish, new oil fields are continually being discovered, ensuring the future of gas lighting for a long time to come.
The advent of the gas-mantle is responsible for the survival of gas-lighting, because when it appeared electric lamps had already been invented. These were destined to become the formidable light-sources of the approaching century and without the gas-mantle gas-lighting would not have prospered. Auer von Welsbach was conducting a spectroscopic study of the rare-earths when he was confronted with the problem of heating these substances. He immersed cotton in solutions of these salts as a variation of the regular means for studying elements by injecting them into flames. After burning the cotton he found that he had a replica of the original fabric composed of the oxide of the metal, and this glowed brilliantly when left in the flame.
The introduction of the gas-mantle is what kept gas-lighting alive because, by the time it came out, electric lamps had already been invented. These were set to become the powerful light sources of the coming century, and without the gas-mantle, gas-lighting wouldn’t have thrived. Auer von Welsbach was doing a spectroscopic study on rare-earth elements when he faced the challenge of heating these substances. He soaked cotton in solutions of these salts as a different approach to the usual method of studying elements by putting them into flames. After burning the cotton, he discovered that he had created a replica of the original material made up of the metal oxide, which glowed brightly when left in the flame.
This gave him the idea of producing a mantle for illuminating purposes and in 1885 he placed such a mantle in commercial use. His first mantles were unsatisfactory, but they were improved in 1886 by the use of thoria, an oxide of thorium, in conjunction with other rare-earth oxides. His mantle was now not only stronger but it gave more light. Later he greatly improved the mantles by purifying the oxides and finally achieved his great triumph by adding a slight amount of ceria, an oxide of cerium. Welsbach is deserving of a great deal of credit for his extensive work, which overcame many difficulties and finally gave to the world a durable mantle that greatly increased the amount of light previously obtainable from gas.
This inspired him to create a mantle for lighting purposes, and in 1885, he put such a mantle on the market. His first mantles were not great, but they improved in 1886 with the use of thoria, an oxide of thorium, along with other rare-earth oxides. Now, his mantle was not only stronger, but it also produced more light. Later, he made even better mantles by purifying the oxides and ultimately achieved his significant breakthrough by adding a small amount of ceria, an oxide of cerium. Welsbach deserves a lot of credit for his extensive work, which tackled many challenges and ultimately provided the world with a durable mantle that significantly increased the amount of light previously available from gas.
The physical characteristics of a mantle depend upon the fabric and upon the rare-earths used. It must not shrink unduly when burned, and the ash should remain porous. It has been found that a mantle in which thoria is used alone is a poor light-source, but that when a small amount of ceria is added the mantle glows brilliantly. By experiment it was determined that the best proportions for the rare-earth content are one part of ceria and ninety-nine parts of thoria. Greater or less proportions of ceria decreased the light-output. The actual percentage of these oxides in the ash of the mantle is about 10 per cent., making the content of ceria about one part in one thousand.
The physical properties of a mantle depend on the material and the rare-earth elements used. It shouldn’t shrink too much when it’s burned, and the ash should stay porous. Research shows that a mantle made only with thoria doesn’t produce much light, but adding a small amount of ceria makes it glow brightly. Experiments found that the best mixture for the rare-earth content is one part ceria to ninety-nine parts thoria. Using more or less ceria reduces the light output. The actual percentage of these oxides in the ash of the mantle is about 10 percent, which means the ceria content is roughly one part in one thousand.
Mantles are made by knitting cylinders of cotton or of other fiber and soaking these in a solution of the nitrates of cerium and thorium. One end of the cylinder is then sewed together with asbestos thread, which also provides the loop for supporting the mantle over the burner. After the mantle has dried in proper form, it is burned; the organic matter disappears and the nitrates are converted into oxides. After this "burning off" has been accomplished and any residual blackening is removed, the mantle is dipped into collodion, which strengthens it for shipping and handling. The collodion is a solution of gun-cotton in alcohol and ether to which an oil such as castor-oil has been added to prevent excessive shrinkage on drying.
Mantles are created by knitting cylinders out of cotton or other fibers and soaking them in a solution of cerium and thorium nitrates. One end of the cylinder is then sewn shut with asbestos thread, which also forms the loop to hang the mantle over the burner. Once the mantle has dried in proper shape, it is burned; the organic material disappears, and the nitrates turn into oxides. After this "burning off" process is complete and any leftover blackness is cleaned off, the mantle is dipped in collodion, which reinforces it for shipping and handling. Collodion is a mixture of gun-cotton dissolved in alcohol and ether, with an oil like castor oil added to reduce excessive shrinkage while it dries.
The materials and structure of the fabric of mantles have been subjected to much study. Cotton was first used; then ramie fibers were introduced. The ramie mantle was found to possess a greater life than the cotton mantle. Later the mantles were mercerized by immersion in ammonia-water and this process yielded a stronger material. The latest development is the use of an artificial silk as the base fabric, which results in a mantle superior to previous mantles in strength, flexibility, permanence of form, and permanence of luminous property. This artificial silk mantle will permit of handling even after it has been in use for several hundred hours. This great advance appears to be due to the fact that after the artificial-silk fibers have been burned off, the fibers are solid and continuous instead of porous as in previous mantles.
The materials and structure of mantle fabrics have been studied extensively. Cotton was the first material used, followed by the introduction of ramie fibers. It was found that ramie mantles lasted longer than cotton ones. Later, the mantles were treated with a process involving ammonia-water, which produced a stronger material. The latest innovation is using artificial silk as the base fabric, resulting in a mantle that is superior in strength, flexibility, durability, and brightness retention compared to previous versions. This artificial silk mantle can withstand handling even after being used for several hundred hours. This significant improvement seems to stem from the fact that once the artificial silk fibers are burned off, the remaining fibers are solid and continuous rather than porous like those used in earlier mantles.
The color-value of the light from mantles may be varied considerably by altering the proportions of the rare-earths. The yellowness of the light has been traced to ceria, so by varying the proportions of ceria, the color of the light may be influenced.
The color value of the light from mantles can be significantly changed by adjusting the amounts of rare-earth elements. The yellowish tone of the light has been linked to ceria, so by varying the amounts of ceria, the color of the light can be affected.
The inverted mantle introduced greater possibilities into gas-lighting. The light could be directed downward with ease and many units such as inverted bowls were developed. In fact, the lighting-fixtures and the lighting-effects obtainable kept pace with those of electric lighting, notwithstanding the greater difficulties encountered by the designer of gas-lighting fixtures. Many problems were encountered in designing an inverted burner operating on the Bunsen principle, but they were finally satisfactorily solved. In recent years a great deal of study has been given to the efficiency of gas-burners, with the result that a high level of development has been reached.
The inverted mantle opened up more possibilities for gas lighting. The light could be easily directed downward, leading to the development of many units like inverted bowls. In fact, the lighting fixtures and effects achieved kept up with those of electric lighting, despite the additional challenges faced by designers of gas-lighting fixtures. Designers encountered many issues when creating an inverted burner based on the Bunsen principle, but those were eventually resolved. In recent years, a lot of research has been focused on improving the efficiency of gas burners, resulting in significant advancements.
Several methods of electrical ignition have been evolved which in general employ the electric spark. Electrical ignition and developments of remote control have added great improvements especially to street-lighting by means of gas. Gas-valves for remote control are actuated by gas pressure and by electromagnets. In general, the gas-lighting engineers have kept pace marvelously with electric lighting, when their handicaps are considered.
Several methods of electrical ignition have been developed that generally use an electric spark. Electrical ignition and advancements in remote control have greatly improved street lighting using gas. Gas valves for remote control are activated by gas pressure and electromagnets. Overall, gas lighting engineers have kept up remarkably well with electric lighting, considering the challenges they face.
Various types of burners have appeared which aimed to burn more gas in a given time under a mantle and thereby to increase the output of light. These led to the development of the pressure system in which the pressure of gas was at first several times greater than usual. The gas is fed into the mixing tube under this higher pressure in a manner which also draws in an adequate amount of air. In this way the combustion at the burner is forced beyond the point reached with the usual pressure. Ordinary gas pressure is equal to that of a few inches of water, but high-pressure systems employ pressures as great as sixty inches of water. Under this high-pressure system, mantle-burners yield as high as 500 lumens per cubic foot of gas per hour.
Various types of burners have been developed to burn more gas in a shorter amount of time under a mantle, which increases light output. This led to the creation of a pressure system where the gas pressure is initially several times higher than normal. The gas is fed into the mixing tube at this higher pressure, which also pulls in enough air. This forces combustion at the burner beyond what can be achieved with regular pressure. Normal gas pressure is equivalent to a few inches of water, but high-pressure systems use pressures as high as sixty inches of water. With this high-pressure system, mantle-burners can produce up to 500 lumens per cubic foot of gas per hour.
The fuels for gas-lighting are natural gas, carbureted water-gas, and coal-gas obtained by distilling coal, but there are different methods of producing the artificial gases. Coal-gas is produced analytically by distilling certain kinds of coal, but water-gas and producer-gas are made synthetically by the action of several constituents upon one another. Carbureted water-gas is made from fixed carbon, steam, and oil and also from steam and oil. Producer-gas is made by the action of steam or air or both upon fixed carbon. Water-gas made from steam and oil is usually limited to those places where the raw materials are readily available. The composition of a gas determines its heating and illuminating values, and constituents favorable to one are not necessarily favorable to the other. Coal-gas usually is of lower illuminating value than carbureted water-gas. It contains more hydrogen, for example, than water-gas and it is well known that hydrogen gives little light on burning.
The fuels for gas lighting are natural gas, carbureted water gas, and coal gas, which is produced by distilling coal, but there are various ways to create these artificial gases. Coal gas is produced by distilling specific types of coal, while water gas and producer gas are created through the interaction of different components. Carbureted water gas is made from fixed carbon, steam, and oil or just steam and oil. Producer gas is generated by the interaction of steam or air, or both, with fixed carbon. Water gas made from steam and oil is typically limited to areas where the raw materials are readily available. The composition of a gas determines its heating and lighting properties, and components that are beneficial for one may not be for the other. Generally, coal gas has a lower lighting value than carbureted water gas, which has a higher hydrogen content than water gas, and it’s well-known that hydrogen produces little light when burned.
It has been seen in a previous chapter that the distillation of gas from coal for illuminating purposes began in the latter part of the eighteenth century. From this beginning the manufacture of coal-gas has been developed to a great and complex industry. The method is essentially destructive distillation. The coal is placed in a retort and when it reaches a temperature of about 700°F. through heating by an outside fire, the coal begins to fuse and hydrocarbon vapors begin to emanate. These are generally paraffins and olefins. As the temperature increases, these hydrocarbons begin to be affected. The chemical combinations which have long existed are broken up and there are rearrangements of the atoms of carbon and hydrogen. The actual chemical reactions become very complex and are somewhat shrouded in uncertainty. In this last stage the illuminating and heating values of the gas are determined. Usually about four hours are allowed for the complete distillation of the gaseous and liquid products from a charge of coal. Many interesting chemical problems arise in this process and the influences of temperature and time cannot be discussed within the scope of this book. Besides the coal-gas, various by-products are obtained depending upon the raw materials, upon the procedure, and upon the market.
It has been mentioned in an earlier chapter that gas distillation from coal for lighting purposes started in the late eighteenth century. From this point, coal-gas production has evolved into a large and complex industry. The process mainly involves destructive distillation. Coal is placed in a retort, and when the temperature reaches around 700°F due to heating from an external fire, the coal starts to melt, and hydrocarbon vapors begin to release. These are typically paraffins and olefins. As the temperature rises, these hydrocarbons start to change. The chemical bonds that have existed for a long time are broken down, leading to rearrangements of carbon and hydrogen atoms. The actual chemical reactions become very intricate and somewhat uncertain. At this final stage, the gas's illuminating and heating values are determined. Usually, about four hours are allowed for the complete distillation of gaseous and liquid products from a batch of coal. Many interesting chemical challenges come up during this process, and the effects of temperature and time cannot be explored in this book. In addition to coal-gas, various by-products are produced depending on the raw materials, the procedure, and the market.
After the coal-gas is produced it must be purified and the sulphureted hydrogen at least must be removed. One method of accomplishing this is by washing the gas with water and ammonia, which also removes some of the carbon dioxide and hydrocyanic acid. Various other undesirable constituents are removed by chemical means, depending upon the conditions. The purified gas is now delivered to the gas-holder; but, of course, all this time the pressure is governed, in order that the pressure in the mains will be maintained constant.
After the coal gas is produced, it needs to be purified, and at the very least, the hydrogen sulfide has to be removed. One way to do this is by washing the gas with water and ammonia, which also takes out some of the carbon dioxide and hydrocyanic acid. Various other unwanted components are eliminated through chemical methods, depending on the situation. The purified gas is then sent to the gas holder; however, throughout this process, the pressure is controlled to ensure that the pressure in the mains remains constant.
Much attention has been given to the enrichment of gas for illuminating purposes; that is, to produce a gas of high illuminating value from cheap fuel or by inexpensive processes. This has been done by decomposing the tar obtained during the distillation of coal and adding these gases to the coal-gas; by mixing carbureted water-gas with coal-gas; by carbureting inferior coal-gases; and by mixing oil-gas with inferior coal-gas.
Much focus has been placed on enhancing gas for lighting purposes; that is, to create a gas with a high lighting value from low-cost fuels or through affordable methods. This has been achieved by breaking down the tar produced during coal distillation and adding these gases to the coal gas; by blending carbureted water gas with coal gas; by improving low-quality coal gases; and by combining oil gas with lower-grade coal gas.
Water-gas is of low illuminating value, but after it is carbureted it burns with a brilliant flame. The water-gas is made by raising the temperature of the fuel bed of hard coal or coke by forced air, which is then cut off, while steam is passed through the incandescent fuel. This yields hydrogen and carbon monoxide. To make carbureted water-gas, oil-gas is mixed with it, the latter being made by heating oil in retorts.
Water-gas has a low lighting value, but once it's carbureted, it burns with a bright flame. Water-gas is produced by increasing the temperature of a coal or coke fuel bed with forced air, which is then stopped while steam is introduced to the glowing fuel. This process generates hydrogen and carbon monoxide. To create carbureted water-gas, it's mixed with oil-gas, which is produced by heating oil in retorts.
A great many kinds of gas are made which are determined by the requirements and the raw materials available. The amount of illuminating gas yielded by a ton of fuel, of course, varies with the method of manufacture, with the raw material, and with the use to which the fuel is to be put. The production of coal-gas per ton of coal is of the order of magnitude of 10,000 cubic feet. A typical yield by weight of a coal-gas retort is,
A lot of different types of gas are produced, depending on the needs and the raw materials available. The amount of illuminating gas produced from a ton of fuel varies based on the production method, the raw materials used, and the purpose of the fuel. The production of coal gas per ton of coal is typically around 10,000 cubic feet. A typical yield by weight from a coal gas retort is,
10,000 cubic feet of gas | 17 | per | cent. |
coke | 70 | " | " |
tar | 5 | " | " |
ammoniacal liquid | 8 | " | " |
The coke is not pure carbon but contains the non-volatile minerals which will remain as ash when the coke is burned, just as if the original coal had been burned. On the crown of the retort used in coal-gas production, pure carbon is deposited. This is used for electric-arc carbons and for other purposes. From the tar many products are derived such as aniline dyes, benzene, carbolic acid, picric acid, napthalene, pitch, anthracene, and saccharin.
The coke isn’t just pure carbon; it also contains non-volatile minerals that will turn into ash when the coke is burned, similar to burning the original coal. On the top of the retort used for coal-gas production, pure carbon is formed. This is used for electric-arc carbons and other applications. From , various products are derived from the tar, including aniline dyes, benzene, carbolic acid, picric acid, naphthalene, pitch, anthracene, and saccharin.
A typical analysis of the gas distilled from coal is very approximately as follows,
A typical analysis of the gas distilled from coal is roughly as follows,
Hydrocarbons | 40 | per | cent. |
Hydrogen | 50 | " | " |
Carbon monoxide | 4 | " | " |
Nitrogen | 4 | " | " |
Carbon dioxide | 1 | " | " |
Various other gases | 1 | " | " |
It is seen that illuminating gas is not a definite compound but a mixture of a number of gases. The proportion of these is controlled in so far as possible in order to obtain illuminating value and some of them are reduced to very small percentages because they are valueless as illuminants or even harmful. The constituents are seen to consist of light-giving hydrocarbons, of gases which yield chiefly heat, and of impurities. The chief hydrocarbons found in illuminating gas are,
It is clear that illuminating gas isn't a specific compound but rather a mixture of several gases. The ratio of these gases is managed as much as possible to achieve optimal illumination, with some of them reduced to very low levels because they offer no value as light sources or can even be harmful. The components include light-producing hydrocarbons, gases that primarily generate heat, and impurities. The main hydrocarbons found in illuminating gas are,
ethylene | C2H4 | crotonylene | C4H6 |
propylene | C3H6 | benzene | C6H6 |
butylene | C4H8 | toluene | C7H8 |
amylene | C5H10 | xylene | C8H10 |
acetylene | C2H2 | methane | C H4 |
allylene | C3H4 | ethane | C2H6 |
A gas which has played a prominent part in lighting is acetylene, produced by the interaction of water and calcium carbide. No other gas easily produced upon a commercial scale yields as much light, volume for volume, as acetylene. It has the great advantage of being easily prepared from raw material whose yield of gas is considerably greater for a given amount than the raw materials which are used in making other illuminating gases. The simplicity of the manufacture of acetylene from calcium carbide and water gives to this gas a great advantage in some cases. It has served for individual lighting in houses and in other places where gas or electric service was unavailable. Where space is limited it also had an advantage and was adopted to some extent on automobiles, motor-boats, ships, lighthouses, and railway cars before electric lighting was developed for these purposes.
A gas that has been significant in lighting is acetylene, created by mixing water and calcium carbide. No other gas, which can be produced on a commercial scale, provides as much light per volume as acetylene. It has the major benefit of being easy to produce from raw materials that yield a lot more gas for the same amount compared to those used for making other illuminating gases. The straightforward process of making acetylene from calcium carbide and water gives this gas a significant edge in certain situations. It has been used for individual lighting in homes and other places where gas or electric service was unavailable. It was also beneficial in tight spaces and was somewhat used in automobiles, motorboats, ships, lighthouses, and railway cars before electric lighting was developed for these uses.
The color of the acetylene flame is satisfactory and it is extremely brilliant compared with most flames. An interesting experiment is found in placing a spark-gap in the flame and sending a series of sparks across it. If the conditions are proper the flame will became very much brighter. When the gas issues from a proper jet under sufficient pressure, the flame is quite steady. Its luminous efficiency gives it an advantage over other open gas-flames in lighting rooms, because for the same amount of light it vitiates the air and exhausts the oxygen to a less degree than the others. Of course, in these respects the gas-mantle is superior.
The color of the acetylene flame is impressive and it’s extremely bright compared to most flames. An interesting experiment involves placing a spark-gap in the flame and sending a series of sparks through it. If the conditions are right, the flame will become significantly brighter. When the gas comes out of a proper jet under sufficient pressure, the flame is quite steady. Its brightness makes it better than other open gas flames for lighting rooms because it contaminates the air and uses up oxygen to a lesser extent than the others. Of course, in these areas, the gas mantle is better.
The reaction which takes place when water and calcium carbide are brought together is a double decomposition and is represented by,
The reaction that occurs when water and calcium carbide are combined is a double decomposition and is represented by,
CaC2 + H2O = C2H2 + CaO
CaC2 + H2O = C2H2 + CaO
It will be seen that the products are acetylene gas and calcium oxide or lime. The lime, being hydroscopic and being in the presence of water or water-vapor in the acetylene generator, really becomes calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2, commonly called slaked lime. If there are impurities in the calcium carbide, it is sometimes necessary to purify the gas before it may be safely used for interior lighting.
It will be noted that the products are acetylene gas and calcium oxide, or lime. The lime, being hygroscopic
The burners and mantles used in acetylene lighting are essentially the same as those for other gas-lighting, excepting, of course, that they are especially adapted for it in minor details.
The burners and mantles used in acetylene lighting are basically the same as those for other gas lighting, except that they are specifically designed for it in some small details.
The chief source of calcium carbide in this country is the electric furnace. Cheap electrical energy from hydro-electric developments, such as the Niagara plants, have done much to make the earth yield its elements. Aluminum is very prevalent in the soil of the earth's surface, because its oxide, alumina, is a chief constituent of ordinary clay. But the elements, aluminum and oxygen, cling tenaciously to each other and only the electric furnace with its excessively high temperatures has been able to separate them on a large commercial scale. Similarly, calcium is found in various compounds over the earth's surface. Limestone abounds widely, hence the oxide and carbonate of lime are wide-spread. But calcium clings tightly to the other elements of its compounds and it has taken the electric furnace to bring it to submission. The cheapness of calcium carbide is due to the development of cheap electric power. It is said that calcium carbide was discovered as a by-product of the electric furnace by accidentally throwing water upon the waste materials of a furnace process. The discovery of a commercial scale of manufacture of calcium carbide has been a boon to isolated lighting. Electric lighting has usurped its place on the automobile and is making inroads in country-home lighting. Doubtless, acetylene will continue to serve for many years, but its future does not appear as bright as it did many years ago.
The main source of calcium carbide in this country is the electric furnace. Affordable electricity from hydroelectric projects, like the Niagara plants, has greatly contributed to extracting elements from the earth. Aluminum is commonly found in the top layer of soil because its oxide, alumina, is a major component of regular clay. However, aluminum and oxygen bond very closely, and only the electric furnace, with its extremely high temperatures, has been able to separate them on a large commercial scale. Likewise, calcium exists in various compounds on the earth's surface. Limestone is widely available, so calcium oxide and calcium carbonate are also common. But calcium is tightly bonded to the other elements in its compounds, and it has taken the electric furnace to break those bonds. The low cost of calcium carbide is due to the availability of cheap electric power. It's said that calcium carbide was discovered accidentally when water was thrown on the waste materials of an electric furnace process. The ability to produce calcium carbide on a commercial scale has been a major benefit for isolated lighting. Electric lighting has taken over its role in cars and is becoming more popular for lighting country homes. While acetylene will likely continue to be used for many years, its future doesn’t look as promising as it did in the past.
The Pintsch gas, used to some extent in railroad passenger-cars in this country, is an oil-gas produced by the destructive distillation of petroleum or other mineral oil in retorts heated externally. The product consists chiefly of methane and heavy hydrocarbons with a small amount of hydrogen. In the early days of railways, some trains were not run after dark and those which were operated were not always lighted. At first attempts were made at lighting railway cars with compressed coal-gas, but the disadvantage of this was the large tank required. Obviously, a gas of higher illuminating-value per volume was desired where limited storage space was available, and Pintsch turned his attention to oil-gas. Gas suffers in illuminating-value upon being compressed, but oil-gas suffers only about half the loss that coal-gas does. In about 1880 Pintsch developed a method of welding cylinders and buoys which satisfied lighthouse authorities and he was enabled to furnish these filled with compressed gas. Thus the buoy was its own gas-tank. He devised lanterns which would remain lighted regardless of wind and waves and thus gained a start with his compressed-gas systems. He compressed the gas to a pressure of about one hundred and fifty pounds per square inch and was obliged to devise a reducer which would deliver the gas to the burner at about one pound per square inch. This regulator served well throughout many years of exacting service. The system began to be adopted on ships and railroads in 1880 and for many years it has served well.
The Pintsch gas, which was somewhat used in railroad passenger cars in this country, is an oil-based gas produced by the destructive distillation of petroleum or other mineral oils in externally heated retorts. The main components of this gas are methane and heavier hydrocarbons, with a small amount of hydrogen. In the early days of railroads, some trains didn’t run after dark, and those that did weren’t always lit. Initially, railway cars were lit with compressed coal gas, but the downside was the large tank it required. Clearly, a gas with a higher illuminating value per volume was needed due to limited storage space, so Pintsch focused on oil gas. Gas loses its illuminating value when compressed, but oil gas only loses about half as much as coal gas. Around 1880, Pintsch developed a method for welding cylinders and buoys that satisfied lighthouse authorities, allowing him to supply them filled with compressed gas. This way, the buoy acted as its own gas tank. He also created lanterns that would stay lit regardless of wind and waves, helping him gain traction with his compressed gas systems. He compressed the gas to about one hundred and fifty pounds per square inch and had to create a reducer to deliver the gas to the burner at around one pound per square inch. This regulator worked effectively for many years of demanding use. The system began to be adopted on ships and railroads in 1880 and has been reliable for many years.
Although gas-lighting has affected the activities of mankind considerably by intensifying commerce and industry and by advancing social progress, the illuminants which eventually took the lead have extended the possibilities and influences of artificial light. In the brief span of a century civilized man is almost totally independent of natural light in those fields over which he has control. What another century will bring can be predicted only from the accomplishments of the past. These indicate possibilities beyond the powers of imagination.
Although gas lighting has significantly impacted human activities by boosting commerce and industry and promoting social progress, the lighting sources that eventually took precedence have expanded the potential and effects of artificial light. In just a hundred years, civilized humans have become nearly completely independent of natural light in the areas they control. What the next century will bring can only be predicted based on past achievements. These achievements point to possibilities beyond what we can imagine.
IX
THE ELECTRIC ARCS
Early in 1800 Volta wrote a letter to the President of the Royal Society of London announcing the epochal discovery of a device now known as the voltaic pile. This letter was published in the Transactions and it created great excitement among scientific men, who immediately began active investigations of certain electrical phenomena. Volta showed that all metals could be arranged in a series so that each one would indicate a positive electric potential when in contact with any metal following it in the series. He constructed a pile of metal disks consisting of zinc and copper alternated and separated by wet cloths. At first he believed that mere contact was sufficient, but when, later, it was shown that chemical action took place, rapid progress was made in the construction of voltaic cells. The next step after his pile was constructed was to place pairs of strips of copper and zinc in cups containing water or dilute acid. Volta received many honors for his discovery, which contributed so much to the development of electrical science and art—among them a call to Paris by Bonaparte to exhibit his electrical experiments, and to receive a medal struck in his honor.
Early in 1800, Volta wrote a letter to the President of the Royal Society of London announcing his groundbreaking discovery of a device now known as the voltaic pile. This letter was published in the Transactions and generated a lot of excitement among scientists, who quickly started investigating various electrical phenomena. Volta demonstrated that all metals could be arranged in a series so that each one would show a positive electric potential when in contact with any metal that followed it in the series. He built a pile of metal disks made of alternating zinc and copper, separated by wet cloths. At first, he thought that just contact was enough, but later discoveries showed that chemical reactions were occurring, which led to rapid advancements in the construction of voltaic cells. The next step after he built his pile was to place pairs of copper and zinc strips in cups with water or diluted acid. Volta received numerous honors for his discovery, which significantly advanced electrical science and technology—these included an invitation to Paris by Bonaparte to showcase his electrical experiments and receive a medal in his honor.
While Volta was being showered with honors, various scientific men with great enthusiasm were entering new fields of research, among which was the heating value of electric current and particularly of electric sparks made by breaking a circuit. Late in 1800 Sir Humphrey Davy was the first to use charcoal for the sparking points. In a lecture before the Royal Society in the following year he described and demonstrated that the "spark" passing between two pieces of charcoal was larger and more brilliant than between brass spheres. Apparently, he was producing a feeble arc, rather than a pure spark. In the years which immediately followed many scientific men in England, France, and Germany were publishing the results of their studies of electrical phenomena bordering upon the arc.
While Volta was receiving numerous awards, many enthusiastic scientists were exploring new fields of research, including the heating value of electric current, especially the electric sparks created by breaking a circuit. Late in 1800, Sir Humphrey Davy was the first to use charcoal for the sparking points. In a lecture before the Royal Society the following year, he described and demonstrated that the "spark" occurring between two pieces of charcoal was larger and brighter than that between brass spheres. He was likely producing a weak arc, rather than just a pure spark. In the years that followed, many scientists in England, France, and Germany published their findings on electrical phenomena related to the arc.
By subscription among the members of the Royal Society, a voltaic battery of two thousand cells was obtained and in 1808 Davy exhibited the electric arc on a large scale. It is difficult to judge from the reports of these early investigations who was the first to recognize the difference between the spark and the arc. Certainly the descriptions indicate that the simple spark was not being experimented with, but the source of electric current available at that time was of such high resistance that only feeble arcs could have been produced. In 1809 Davy demonstrated publicly an arc obtained by a current from a Volta pile of one thousand plates. This he described as "a most brilliant flame, of from half an inch to one and a quarter inches in length."
By pooling resources from the members of the Royal Society, a voltaic battery with two thousand cells was created, and in 1808, Davy showcased the electric arc on a large scale. It's hard to tell from the reports of these early studies who was the first to notice the difference between the spark and the arc. The descriptions certainly suggest that the simple spark wasn't what they were experimenting with, but the electric current available at that time had such high resistance that only weak arcs could have been produced. In 1809, Davy publicly demonstrated an arc generated by a current from a Volta pile made up of one thousand plates. He described it as "a most brilliant flame, ranging from half an inch to one and a quarter inches in length."
In the library of the Royal Society, Davy's notes made during the years of 1805 and 1812 are available in two large volumes. These were arranged and paged by Faraday, who was destined to contribute greatly to the future development of the science and art of electricity. In one of these volumes is found an account of a lecture-experiment by Davy which certainly is a description of the electric arc. An extract of this account is as follows:
In the Royal Society's library, Davy's notes from 1805 to 1812 are available in two large volumes. These were organized and paged by Faraday, who would go on to make significant contributions to the future of electricity as both a science and an art. One of these volumes contains a record of a lecture-experiment by Davy that clearly describes the electric arc. Here’s an excerpt from that account:
The spark [presumably the arc], the light of which was so intense as to resemble that of the sun, ... produced a discharge through heated air nearly three inches in length, and of a dazzling splendor. Several bodies which had not been fused before were fused by this flame.... Charcoal was made to evaporate, and plumbago appeared to fuse in vacuo. Charcoal was ignited to intense whiteness by it in oxymuriatic acid, and volatilized by it, but without being decomposed.
The spark, which was so bright it almost resembled the sun, created a discharge through heated air that was nearly three inches long and incredibly bright. Several materials that hadn’t melted before were fused by this flame. Charcoal evaporated, and plumbago appeared to melt in a vacuum. Charcoal was heated to a brilliant white light in oxymuriatic acid and turned into gas without decomposing.
From a consideration of his source of electricity, a voltaic pile of two thousand plates, it is certain that this could not have been an electric spark. Later in his notes Davy continued:
From looking at his source of electricity, a voltaic pile made of two thousand plates, it's clear that this couldn't have been an electric spark. Later in his notes, Davy continued:
...the charcoal became ignited to whitness, and by withdrawing the points from each other, a constant discharge took place through the heated air, in a space at least equal to four inches, producing a most brilliant ascending arch of light, broad and conical in form in the middle.
...the charcoal turned white when it ignited, and by separating the points, a steady release happened through the heated air, in an area at least four inches wide, producing an impressive rising arc of light that was wide and cone-shaped in the center.
This is surely a description of the electric arc. Apparently the electrodes were in a horizontal position and the arc therefore was horizontal. Owing to the rise of the heated air, the arc tended to rise in the form of an arch. From this appearance the term "arc" evolved and Davy himself in 1820 definitely named the electric flame, the "arc." This name was continued in use even after the two carbons were arranged in a vertical co-axial position and the arc no more "arched." An interesting scientific event of 1820 was the discovery by Arago and by Davy independently that the arc could be deflected by a magnet and that it was similar to a wire carrying current in that there was a magnetic field around it. This has been taken advantage of in certain modern arc-lamps in which inclined carbons are used. In these arcs a magnet keeps the arc in place, for without the magnet the arc would tend to climb up the carbons and go out.
This definitely describes the electric arc. The electrodes were positioned horizontally, so the arc was also horizontal. Due to the rising heated air, the arc tended to rise like an arch. This appearance led to the term "arc," and Davy himself named the electric flame the "arc" in 1820. This name remained in use even after the two carbon rods were set up in a vertical position, which meant the arc no longer "arched." An interesting scientific event in 1820 was the independent discovery by Arago and Davy that the arc could be deflected by a magnet and was similar to a current-carrying wire in that it generated a magnetic field around it. This principle is used in some modern arc lamps where inclined carbon rods are employed. In these setups, a magnet keeps the arc in place; without the magnet, the arc would climb up the carbon rods and extinguish.
In 1838 Gassiot made the discovery that the temperature of the positive electrode of an electric arc is much greater than that of the negative electrode. This is explained in electronic theory by the bombardment of the positive electrode by negative electrons or corpuscles of electricity. This temperature-difference was later taken into account in designing direct-current arc-lamps, for inasmuch as most of the light from an ordinary arc is emitted by the end of the positive electrode, this was placed above the negative electrode. In this manner most of the light from the arc is directed downward where desired. In the few instances in modern times where the ordinary direct-current arc has been used for indirect lighting, in which case the arc is above an inverted shade, the positive carbon is placed below the negative one. Gassiot first proved that the positive electrode is hotter than the negative one by striking an arc between the ends of two horizontal wires of the same substance and diameter. After the arc operated for some time, the positive wire was melted for such a distance that it bent downward, but the negative remained quite straight.
In 1838, Gassiot discovered that the temperature of the positive electrode in an electric arc is significantly higher than that of the negative electrode. This phenomenon is explained in electronic theory by the impact of negative electrons or electric corpuscles bombarding the positive electrode. This temperature difference was later taken into account in the design of direct-current arc lamps, as most of the light produced by a typical arc is emitted from the end of the positive electrode, which was positioned above the negative electrode. This way, most of the light from the arc is directed downward where it’s needed. In a few modern cases where the standard direct-current arc has been used for indirect lighting, with the arc positioned above an inverted shade, the positive carbon is placed below the negative one. Gassiot was the first to demonstrate that the positive electrode is hotter than the negative one by creating an arc between the ends of two horizontal wires of the same material and diameter. After the arc ran for some time, the positive wire melted enough to bend downward, while the negative one remained straight.
Charcoal was used for the electrodes in all the early experiments, but owing to the intense heat of the arc, it burned away rapidly. A progressive step was made in 1843 when electrodes were first made by Foucault from the carbon deposited in retorts in which coal was distilled in the production of coal-gas. However, charcoal, owing to its soft porous character, gives a longer arc and a larger flame. In 1877 the "cored" carbons were introduced. These consist of hard molded carbon rods in which there is a core of soft carbon. In these are combined the advantages of charcoal and hard carbon and the core in burning away more rapidly has a tendency to hold the arc in the center. Modern carbons for ordinary arc-lamps are generally made of a mixture of retort-carbon, soot, and coal-tar. This paste is forced through dies and the carbons are baked at a fairly high temperature. A variation in the hardness of the carbons may be obtained as the requirements demand by varying the proportions of soot and retort-carbon. Cored carbons are made by inserting a small rod in the center of the die and the carbons are formed with a hollow core. This may be filled with a softer carbon.
Charcoal was used for the electrodes in all the early experiments, but because of the intense heat of the arc, it burned away quickly. A significant advancement happened in 1843 when Foucault first made electrodes from the carbon deposited in retorts where coal was distilled to produce coal gas. However, charcoal, due to its soft and porous nature, creates a longer arc and a larger flame. In 1877, "cored" carbons were introduced. These consist of hard molded carbon rods with a core of soft carbon. This combination brings together the benefits of charcoal and hard carbon, and since the core burns away more quickly, it helps keep the arc centered. Modern carbons for regular arc lamps are generally made from a blend of retort carbon, soot, and coal tar. This mixture is forced through dies, and the carbons are baked at a fairly high temperature. A variation in the hardness of the carbons can be achieved as needed by adjusting the proportions of soot and retort carbon. Cored carbons are created by inserting a small rod in the center of the die, forming the carbons with a hollow core that can be filled with a softer carbon.
If two carbons connected to a source of electric current are brought together, the circuit is completed and a current flows. If the two carbons are now slightly separated, an arc will be formed. As the arc burns the carbons waste away and in the case of direct current, the positive decreases in length more rapidly than the negative one. This is due largely to the extremely high temperature of the positive tip, where the carbon fairly boils. A crater is formed at the positive tip and this is always characteristic of the positive carbon of the ordinary arc, although it becomes more shallow as the arc-length is increased. The negative tip has a bright spot to which one end of the arc is attached. By wasting away, the length of the arc increases and likewise its resistance, until finally insufficient current will pass to maintain the arc. It then goes out and to start it the carbons must be brought together and separated. The mechanisms of modern arc-lamps perform these functions automatically by the ingenious use of electromagnets.
If two carbon rods connected to a source of electrical current are brought close together, the circuit completes and current flows. If the two carbon rods are then slightly separated, an arc forms. As the arc burns, the carbon rods wear down, and in the case of direct current, the positive rod shortens more quickly than the negative one. This is mainly because of the extremely high temperature at the positive tip, where the carbon practically boils. A crater develops at the positive tip, which is always a feature of the positive carbon in a regular arc, although it becomes shallower as the arc lengthens. The negative tip has a bright spot where one end of the arc is attached. As the carbon wears down, the arc length increases, along with its resistance, until eventually, there isn’t enough current to sustain the arc. It then extinguishes, and to restart it, the carbon rods need to be brought together and then separated. The systems in modern arc lamps perform these functions automatically using electromagnets in a clever way.
The interior of the arc is of a violet color and the exterior is a greenish yellow. The white-hot spot on the negative tip is generally surrounded by a fringe of agitated globules which consist of tar and other ingredients of carbons. Often material is deposited from the positive crater upon the negative tip and these accretions may build up a rounded tip. This deposit sometimes interferes with the proper formation of the arc and also with the light from the arc. It is often responsible for the hissing noise, although this hissing occurs with any length of arc when the current is sufficiently increased. The hissing seems to be due to the crater enlarging under excessive current until it passes the confines of the cross-section of the carbon. It thus tends to run up the side, where it comes in contact with oxygen of the air. In this manner the carbon is directly burned instead of being vaporized, as it is when the hot crater is small and is protected from the air by the arc itself. The temperature of the positive crater is in the neighborhood of 6000° to 7000°F. The brightness of the arc under pressure is the greatest produced by artificial means and is very intense. By putting the arc under high pressure, the brightness of the sun may be attained. The temperature of the hottest spot on the negative tip is about a thousand degrees below that of the positive.
The inside of the arc is a violet color, while the outside is a greenish-yellow. The white-hot spot on the negative tip is usually surrounded by a fringe of agitated globules made up of tar and other carbon components. Material often gets deposited from the positive crater onto the negative tip, and these buildups can create a rounded tip. This deposit can sometimes disrupt the proper formation of the arc and also affect the light produced by it. It often causes a hissing noise, although this hissing can occur with any length of arc when the current is high enough. The hissing seems to happen because the crater expands under high current until it extends beyond the carbon's cross-section. It then tends to move up the side, where it meets oxygen in the air. This way, the carbon is burned directly instead of being vaporized, as happens when the hot crater is small and shielded from the air by the arc itself. The temperature of the positive crater is around 6000° to 7000°F. The brightness of the arc under pressure is the greatest produced by artificial means and is very intense. By increasing the arc's pressure, we can reach the brightness of the sun. The temperature of the hottest spot on the negative tip is about a thousand degrees lower than that of the positive.
No great demand arose for arc-lamps until the development of the Gramme dynamo in 1870, which provided a practicable source of electric current. In 1876 Jablochkov invented his famous "electric candle" consisting of two rods of carbon placed side by side but separated by insulating material. In this country Brush was the pioneer in the development of open arc-lamps. In 1877 he invented an arc-lamp and an efficient form of dynamo to supply the electrical energy. The first arc-lamps were ordinary direct-current open arcs and the carbons were made from high-grade coke, lampblack, and syrup. The upper positive carbon in these lamps is consumed at a rate of one to two inches per hour. Inasmuch as about 85 per cent. of the total light is emitted by the upper (positive) carbon and most of this from the crater, the lower carbon is made as small as possible in order not to obstruct any more light than necessary. The positive carbon of the open arc is often cored and the negative is a smaller one of solid carbon. This combination operates quite satisfactorily, but sometimes solid carbons are used outdoors. The voltage across the arc is about 50 volts.
No significant demand for arc lamps came about until the Gramme dynamo was developed in 1870, which provided a practical source of electric current. In 1876, Jablochkov invented his well-known "electric candle," made of two rods of carbon placed side by side but separated by insulating material. In the U.S., Brush was the first to develop open arc lamps. In 1877, he invented an arc lamp and an efficient type of dynamo to supply the electrical energy. The original arc lamps were basic direct-current open arcs, and the carbons were made from high-grade coke, lampblack, and syrup. The upper positive carbon in these lamps wears down at a rate of one to two inches per hour. Since about 85 percent of the total light comes from the upper (positive) carbon, mostly from the crater, the lower carbon is kept as small as possible to avoid blocking unnecessary light. The positive carbon of the open arc is often cored, and the negative is a smaller piece of solid carbon. This setup works quite well, but sometimes solid carbons are used outdoors. The voltage across the arc is about 50 volts.
In 1846 Staite discovered that the carbons of an arc enclosed in a glass vessel into which the air was not freely admitted were consumed less rapidly than when the arc operated in the open air. After the appearance of the dynamo, when increased attention was given to the development of arc-lamps, this principle of enclosing the arcs was again considered. The early attempts in about 1880 were unsuccessful because low voltages were used and it was not until the discovery was made that the negative tip builds up considerably for voltages under 65 volts, that higher voltages were employed. In 1893 marked improvements were consummated and Jandus brought out a successful enclosed arc operating at 80 volts. Marks contributed largely to the success of the enclosed arc by showing that a small current and a high voltage of 80 to 85 volts were the requisites for a satisfactory enclosed arc.
In 1846, Staite found that the carbon in an arc enclosed in a glass vessel, where air didn’t flow freely, was used up more slowly than when the arc was exposed to open air. After the dynamo was introduced and attention shifted to developing arc lamps, the idea of enclosing the arcs was revisited. The initial efforts around 1880 didn’t work well because they used low voltages. It wasn't until they figured out that the negative tip builds up significantly for voltages under 65 volts that they started using higher voltages. By 1893, significant improvements were made, and Jandus launched a successful enclosed arc that operated at 80 volts. Marks played a key role in the success of the enclosed arc by demonstrating that a small current and a high voltage of 80 to 85 volts were essential for a satisfactory enclosed arc.
The principle of the enclosed arc is simple. A closely fitting glass globe surrounds the arc, the fit being as close as the feeding of the carbons will permit. When the arc is struck the oxygen is rapidly consumed and the heated gases and the enclosure check the supply of fresh air. The result is that the carbons are consumed about one tenth as rapidly as in the open arc. There is no crater formed on the positive tip and the arc wanders considerably. The efficiency of the enclosed arc as a light-producer is lower than that of the open arc, but it found favor because of its slow rate of consumption of the carbons and consequent decreased attention necessary. This arc operates a hundred hours or more without trimming, and will therefore operate a week or more in street-lighting without attention. When it is considered that open arcs for all-night burning were supplied with two pairs of carbons, the second set going into use automatically when the first were consumed, the value of the enclosed arc is apparent. However, the open arc has served well and has given way to greater improvements. It is rapidly disappearing from use.
The principle of the enclosed arc is straightforward. A tightly fitting glass globe surrounds the arc, as close as the feeding of the carbons allows. When the arc is initiated, oxygen is quickly used up, and the heated gases along with the enclosure limit the supply of fresh air. As a result, the carbons are consumed about one-tenth as quickly as in the open arc. There is no crater formed on the positive tip, and the arc fluctuates quite a bit. The efficiency of the enclosed arc as a light source is lower than that of the open arc, but it became popular due to its slower carbon consumption rate and the reduced attention required. This arc can operate for a hundred hours or more without needing maintenance, which means it can run for a week or more in street lighting without any oversight. Considering that open arcs for all-night burning were supplied with two pairs of carbons, where the second set would automatically engage when the first was exhausted, the advantages of the enclosed arc are clear. However, the open arc has served its purpose well and has been succeeded by better advancements. It is quickly becoming obsolete.
The alternating-current arc-lamp was developed after the appearance of the direct-current open-arc and has been widely used. It has no positive or negative carbons, for the alternating current is reversing in direction usually at the rate of 120 times per second; that is, it passes through 60 complete cycles during each second. No marked craters form on the tips and the two carbons are consumed at about the same rate. The average temperature of the carbon tips is lower than that of the positive tip of a direct-current arc, with the result that the luminous efficiency is lower. These arcs have been made of both the open and enclosed type. They are characterized by a humming noise due to the effect of alternating current upon the mechanism and also upon the air near the arc. This humming sound is quite different from the occasional hissing of a direct-current arc. When soft carbons are used, the arc is larger and apparently this mass of vapor reduces the humming considerably. The humming is not very apparent for the enclosed alternating-current arc. The alternating arc can easily be detected by closely observing moving objects. If a pencil or coin be moved rapidly, a number of images appear which are due to the pulsating character of the light. At each reversal of the current, the current reaches zero value and the arc is virtually extinguished. Therefore, there is a maximum brightness midway between the reversals.
The alternating-current arc lamp was developed after the introduction of the direct-current open-arc and has been commonly used. It doesn't have positive or negative carbons because the alternating current reverses direction about 120 times per second, completing 60 cycles each second. No significant craters form on the tips, and both carbons are consumed at roughly the same rate. The average temperature of the carbon tips is lower than that of the positive tip of a direct-current arc, resulting in lower luminous efficiency. These arcs can be made in both open and enclosed types. They are known for a humming noise caused by the effect of alternating current on the mechanism and the surrounding air near the arc. This humming sound is quite different from the occasional hissing of a direct-current arc. When soft carbons are used, the arc is larger, and this cloud of vapor considerably reduces the humming. The humming is less noticeable for the enclosed alternating-current arc. You can easily detect the alternating arc by closely observing moving objects. If you move a pencil or coin quickly, multiple images appear due to the pulsating nature of the light. With each current reversal, the current reaches zero, and the arc is essentially extinguished. Therefore, there is maximum brightness midway between the reversals.
Various types of all these arcs have been developed to meet the different requirements of ordinary lighting and to adapt this method of light-production to the needs of projection, stage-equipment, lighthouses, search-lights, and other applications.
Various types of all these arcs have been developed to meet the different requirements of regular lighting and to adapt this method of light production to the needs of projections, stage equipment, lighthouses, searchlights, and other applications.
Up to this point the ordinary carbon arc has been considered and it has been seen that most of the light is emitted by the glowing end of the positive carbon. In fact, the light from the arc itself is negligible. A logical step in the development of the arc-lamp was to introduce salts in order to obtain a luminous flame. This possibility as applied to ordinary gas-flames had been known for years and it is surprising that it had not been early applied to carbons. Apparently Bremer in 1898 was the first to introduce fluorides of calcium, barium, and strontium. The salts deflagrate and a luminous flame envelops the ordinary feeble arc-flame. From these arcs most of the light is emitted by the arc itself, hence the name "flame-arcs."
Up to now, we've looked at the basic carbon arc, and we've noted that most of the light comes from the glowing end of the positive carbon. In fact, the light produced by the arc itself is minimal. A natural next step in the development of the arc lamp was to add salts to create a bright flame. This method has been known for years in relation to regular gas flames, so it's surprising that it wasn't applied to carbon arcs sooner. It seems that Bremer was the first, in 1898, to introduce fluorides of calcium, barium, and strontium. These salts explode, creating a bright flame that surrounds the weak arc flame. In these setups, most of the light comes from the arc itself, which is why they’re called "flame-arcs."
By the introduction of metallic salts into the carbons the possibilities of the arc-lamp were greatly extended. The luminous output of such lamps is much greater than that of an ordinary carbon arc using the same amount of electrical energy. Furthermore, the color or spectral character of the light may be varied through a wide range by the use of various salts. For example, if carbons are impregnated with calcium fluoride, the arc-flame when examined by means of a spectroscope will be seen to contain the characteristic spectrum of calcium, namely, some green, orange, and red rays. These combine to give to this arc a very yellow color. As explained in a previous chapter, the salts for this purpose may be wisely chosen from a knowledge of their fundamental or characteristic flame-spectra.
By introducing metallic salts into the carbons, the capabilities of the arc lamp were significantly enhanced. The light output of these lamps is much greater than that of a typical carbon arc using the same amount of electrical energy. Additionally, the color or spectral quality of the light can be adjusted over a wide range by using different salts. For instance, if the carbons are treated with calcium fluoride, the arc flame, when viewed through a spectroscope, will display the characteristic spectrum of calcium, which includes some green, orange, and red rays. These combine to give the arc a very yellow color. As discussed in a previous chapter, the salts for this purpose can be wisely selected based on an understanding of their basic or characteristic flame spectra.
These lamps have been developed to meet a variety of needs and their luminous efficiencies range from 20 to 40 lumens per watt, being several times that of the ordinary carbon open-arc. The red flame-arc owes its color chiefly to strontium, whose characteristic visible spectrum consists chiefly of red and yellow rays. Barium gives to the arc a fairly white color. The yellow and so-called white flame-arcs have been most commonly used. Flame-arcs have been produced which are close to daylight in color, and powerful blue-white flame-arcs have satisfied the needs of various chemical industries and photographic processes. These arcs are generally operated in a space where the air-supply is restricted similar to the enclosed-arc principle. Inasmuch as poisonous fumes are emitted in large quantities from some flame-arcs, they are not used indoors without rather generous ventilation. In fact, the flame-arcs are such powerful light-sources that they are almost entirely used outdoors or in very large interiors especially of the type of open factory buildings. They are made for both direct and alternating current and the mechanisms have been of several types. The electrodes are consumed rather rapidly so they are made as long as possible. In one type of arc, the carbons are both fed downward, their lower ends forming a narrow V with the arc-flame between their tips. Under these conditions the arc tends to travel vertically and finally to "stretch" itself to extinction. However, the arc is kept in place by means of a magnet above it which repels the arc and holds it at the ends of the carbons.
These lamps have been designed to fulfill various needs, with their light efficiency ranging from 20 to 40 lumens per watt, which is several times more than an ordinary carbon open-arc. The red flame-arc gets its color mainly from strontium, which primarily produces red and yellow rays in its visible spectrum. Barium gives the arc a fairly white color. The yellow and so-called white flame-arcs are the most commonly used. There are flame-arcs that closely resemble daylight in color, and strong blue-white flame-arcs have met the demands of different chemical industries and photography. These arcs are usually operated in environments where the air supply is limited, similar to the enclosed-arc principle. Since some flame-arcs emit large amounts of toxic fumes, they aren't used indoors without good ventilation. In fact, these flame-arcs are such intense light sources that they are primarily used outdoors or in very large spaces, especially in open factory buildings. They can work with both direct and alternating current, and their mechanisms come in various types. The electrodes wear out relatively quickly, so they are made as long as possible. In one type of arc, both carbon rods are fed downward, their lower ends forming a narrow V with the arc flame between their tips. Under these conditions, the arc tends to move upward and eventually “stretch” itself out completely. However, a magnet positioned above the arc keeps it in place by repelling the arc and holding it at the ends of the carbon rods.
The chief objection to the early flame-arcs was the necessity for frequent renewal of the carbons. This was overcome to a large extent in the Jandus regenerative lamp in which the arc operates in a glass enclosure surrounded by an opal globe. However, in addition to the inner glass enclosure, two cooling chambers of metal are attached to it. Air enters at the bottom and the fumes from the arc pass upward and into the cooling chambers, where the solid products are deposited. The air on returning to the bottom is thus relieved of these solids and the inner glass enclosure remains fairly clean. The lower carbon is impregnated with salts for producing the luminous flame and the upper carbon is cored. The life of the electrodes is about seventy-five hours.
The main issue with the early flame arcs was the need to frequently replace the carbons. This was largely addressed in the Jandus regenerative lamp, where the arc operates in a glass enclosure surrounded by an opal globe. In addition to the inner glass enclosure, there are two metal cooling chambers attached to it. Air enters from the bottom, and the fumes from the arc rise up into the cooling chambers, where the solid products settle. As the air returns to the bottom, it is cleared of these solids, keeping the inner glass enclosure relatively clean. The lower carbon is treated with salts to create the luminous flame, and the upper carbon has a core. The lifespan of the electrodes is around seventy-five hours.
The next step was the introduction of the so-called "luminous-arc" which is a "flame-arc" with entirely different electrodes. The lower (negative) electrode consists of an iron tube packed chiefly with magnetite (an iron oxide) and titanium oxide in the approximate proportions of three to one respectively. The magnetite is a conductor of electricity which is easily vaporized. The arc-flame is large and the titanium gives it a high brilliancy. The positive electrode, usually the upper one, is a short, thick, solid cylinder of copper, which is consumed very slowly. This lamp, known as the magnetite-arc, has a luminous efficiency of about 20 lumens per watt with a clear glass globe.
The next step was the introduction of the so-called "luminous-arc," which is a "flame-arc" using completely different electrodes. The lower (negative) electrode is an iron tube filled mainly with magnetite (an iron oxide) and titanium oxide in roughly a three-to-one ratio. Magnetite is an electrical conductor that vaporizes easily. The arc-flame is large, and the titanium gives it a bright brilliance. The positive electrode, usually the upper one, is a short, thick, solid copper cylinder that wears down very slowly. This lamp, known as the magnetite-arc, has a luminous efficiency of about 20 lumens per watt with a clear glass globe.
The mechanisms which strike the arc and feed the carbons are ingenious devices of many designs depending upon the kind of arc and upon the character of the electric circuit to which it is connected. Late developments in electric incandescent filament lamps have usurped some of the fields in which the arc-lamp reigned supreme for years and its future does not appear as bright now as it did ten years ago. High-intensity arcs have been devised with small carbons for special purposes and considered as a whole a great amount of ingenuity has been expended in the development of arc-lamps. There will be a continued demand for arc-lamps, for scientific developments are opening new fields for them. Their value in photo-engraving, in the moving-picture production studios, in moving-picture projection, and in certain aspects of stage-lighting is firmly established, and it appears that they will find application in certain chemical industries because the arc is a powerful source of radiant energy which is very active in its effects upon chemical reactions.
The mechanisms that create the arc and supply the carbons are clever devices with many designs, depending on the type of arc and the characteristics of the electric circuit they connect to. Recent advancements in electric incandescent filament lamps have taken over some of the areas where arc lamps used to be dominant, and their future doesn't look as promising now as it did ten years ago. High-intensity arcs with small carbons have been created for specific purposes, and overall, a significant amount of creativity has gone into the development of arc lamps. There will still be a demand for arc lamps, as scientific advancements are opening up new opportunities for them. Their value in photo-engraving, film production studios, film projection, and certain aspects of stage lighting is well established, and it seems they will also be used in some chemical industries because the arc is a strong source of radiant energy that has a considerable impact on chemical reactions.
The luminous efficiencies of arc-lamps depend upon so many conditions that it is difficult to present a concise comparison; however, the following may suffice to show the ranges of luminous output per watt under actual conditions of usage. These efficiencies, of course, are less than the efficiencies of the arc alone, because the losses in the mechanism, globes, etc., are included.
The brightness efficiencies of arc lamps vary so much based on different factors that it’s tough to make a straightforward comparison; however, the following can give an idea of the luminous output per watt in real usage conditions. These efficiencies are, of course, lower than the efficiencies of the arc by itself, since they take into account the losses from the mechanism, globes, and so on.
Lumens per watt | |
---|---|
Open carbon arc | 4 to 8 |
Enclosed carbon arc | 7 |
Enclosed flame-arc (yellow or white) | 15 to 25 |
Luminous arc | 10 to 25 |
Another lamp differing widely in appearance from the preceding arcs may be described here because it is known as the mercury-arc. In this lamp mercury is confined in a transparent tube and an arc is started by making and breaking a mercury connection between the two electrodes. The arc may be maintained of a length of several feet. Perhaps the first mercury-arc was produced in 1860 by Way, who permitted a fine jet of mercury to fall from a reservoir into a vessel, the reservoir and receiver being connected to the poles of a battery. The electric current scattered the jet and between the drops arcs were formed. He exhibited this novel light-source on the mast of a yacht and it received great attention. Later, various investigators experimented on the production of a mercury-arc and the first successful ones were made in the form of an inverted U-tube with the ends filled with mercury and the remainder of the tube exhausted.
Another lamp that looks very different from the previous arcs is known as the mercury-arc. In this lamp, mercury is contained in a transparent tube, and an arc is created by connecting and disconnecting the mercury between the two electrodes. The arc can be sustained at lengths of several feet. The first mercury-arc was likely created in 1860 by Way, who allowed a fine stream of mercury to drop from a reservoir into a vessel, with both connected to the poles of a battery. The electric current dispersed the stream, creating arcs between the drops. He showcased this innovative light source on the mast of a yacht, and it attracted a lot of attention. Later, various researchers experimented with creating a mercury-arc, with the first successful designs resembling an inverted U-tube filled with mercury at both ends, while the rest of the tube was evacuated.
Cooper Hewitt was a successful pioneer in the production of practicable mercury-arcs. He made them chiefly in the form of straight tubes of glass up to several feet in length, with enlarged ends to facilitate cooling. The tubes are inclined so that the mercury vapor which condenses will run back into the enlarged end, where a pool of mercury forms the negative electrode. The arc may be started by tilting the tube so that a mercury thread runs down the side and connects with the positive electrode of iron. The heat of the arc volatilizes the mercury so that an arc of considerable length is maintained. The tilting is done by electromagnets. Starting has also been accomplished by means of a heating coil and also by an electric spark. The lamps are stabilized by resistance and inductance coils.
Cooper Hewitt was a groundbreaker in making practical mercury arcs. He primarily created them as straight glass tubes that could be several feet long, with wider ends to help with cooling. The tubes are tilted so that any condensed mercury vapor flows back into the wider end, where a pool of mercury acts as the negative electrode. You can start the arc by tilting the tube so that a thread of mercury runs down the side and connects with the positive iron electrode. The heat from the arc vaporizes the mercury, allowing for a significant arc length to be sustained. The tilting is achieved with electromagnets. Starting has also been done using a heating coil or an electric spark. The lamps are stabilized with resistance and inductance coils.
One of the defects of the light emitted by the incandescent vapor of mercury is its paucity of spectral colors. Its visible spectrum consists chiefly of violet, blue, green, and yellow rays. It emits virtually no red rays, and, therefore, red objects appear devoid of red. The human face appears ghastly under this light and it distorts colors in general. However, it possesses the advantages of high efficiency, of reasonably low brightness, of high actinic value, and of revealing detail clearly. Various attempts have been made to improve the color of the light by adding red rays. Reflectors of a fluorescent red dye have been used with some success, but such a method reduces the luminous efficiency of the lamp considerably. The dye fluoresces red under the illumination of ultra-violet, violet, and blue rays; that is, it has the property of converting radiation of these wave-lengths into radiant energy of longer wave-lengths. By the use of electric incandescent filament lamps in conjunction with mercury-arcs, a fairly satisfactory light is obtained. Many experiments have been made by adding other substances to the mercury, such as zinc, with the hope that the spectrum of the other substance would compensate the defects in the mercury spectrum. However no success has been reached in this direction.
One of the drawbacks of the light produced by incandescent mercury vapor is its limited range of colors. Its visible spectrum mainly includes violet, blue, green, and yellow rays. It hardly emits any red rays, so red objects look colorless. The human face appears pale under this light, and it distorts colors overall. However, it has advantages like high efficiency, relatively low brightness, high actinic value, and clear detail visibility. Various efforts have been made to enhance the light's color by adding red rays. Reflectors coated with a fluorescent red dye have been used with some success, but this approach significantly decreases the lamp's luminous efficiency. The dye fluoresces red when exposed to ultraviolet, violet, and blue rays, meaning it converts radiation at those wavelengths into longer wavelengths. By using electric incandescent filament lamps alongside mercury arcs, a pretty satisfactory light is achieved. Many experiments have been conducted by adding other substances to mercury, like zinc, in hopes that the additional substance would make up for the shortcomings in mercury's spectrum. However, no success has been achieved in this area.
By the use of a quartz tube which can withstand a much higher temperature than glass, the current density can be greatly increased. Thus a small quartz tube of incandescent mercury vapor will emit as much light as a long glass tube. The quartz mercury-arc produces a light which is almost white, but the actual spectrum is very different from that of white sunlight. Although some red rays are emitted by the quartz arc, its spectrum is essentially the same as that of the glass-tube arc. Quartz transmits ultra-violet radiation, which is harmful to the eyes, and inasmuch as the mercury vapor emits such rays, a glass globe should be used to enclose the quartz tube when the lamp is used for ordinary lighting purposes.
By using a quartz tube that can handle much higher temperatures than glass, we can significantly increase the current density. Therefore, a small quartz tube filled with incandescent mercury vapor can produce as much light as a long glass tube. The quartz mercury-arc generates light that is nearly white, but its actual spectrum is quite different from that of natural sunlight. While some red light is emitted by the quartz arc, its spectrum is mostly the same as that of the glass-tube arc. Quartz also allows UV radiation to pass through, which can be harmful to the eyes. Because mercury vapor emits these rays, a glass globe should be used to cover the quartz tube when the lamp is intended for regular lighting.
It is fortunate that such radically different kinds of light-sources are available, for in the complex activities of the present time all are in demand. The quartz mercury-arc finds many isolated uses, owing to its wealth of ultra-violet radiation. It is valuable as a source of ultra-violet for exciting phosphorescence, for examining the transmission of glasses for this radiation, for sterilizing water, for medical purposes, and for photography.
It’s great that we have such a variety of light sources available because they’re all needed in today’s complex activities. The quartz mercury-arc has many specific applications due to its strong output of ultraviolet radiation. It’s useful for exciting phosphorescence, testing how well different glasses transmit this radiation, sterilizing water, medical applications, and photography.
X
THE ELECTRIC INCANDESCENT FILAMENT LAMPS
Prior to 1800 electricity was chiefly a plaything for men of scientific tendencies and it was not until Volta invented the electric pile or battery that certain scientific men gave their entire attention to the study of electricity. Volta was not merely an inventor, for he was one of the greatest scientists of his period, endowed with an imagination which marked him as a genius in creative work. By contributing the electric battery, he added the greatest impetus to research in electrical science that it has ever received. As has already been shown, there began a period of enthusiastic research in the general field of heating effects of electric current. The electric arc was born in the cradle of this enthusiasm, and in the heating of metals by electricity the future incandescent lamp had its beginning.
Before 1800, electricity was mostly a toy for people interested in science, and it wasn't until Volta invented the electric pile or battery that certain scientists focused completely on studying electricity. Volta wasn’t just an inventor; he was one of the greatest scientists of his time, with a creative imagination that set him apart as a genius. By introducing the electric battery, he gave a massive boost to electrical science research like never before. As has already been noted, this sparked a period of enthusiastic exploration into the heating effects of electric current. The electric arc emerged from this excitement, and the heating of metals with electricity marked the beginning of the future incandescent lamp.
Between the years 1841 and 1848 several inventors attempted to make light-sources by heating metals. These crude lamps were operated by means of Grove and Bunsen electric cells, but no practicable incandescent filament lamps were brought out until the development of the electric dynamo supplied an adequate source of electric current. As electrical science progressed through the continued efforts of scientific men, it finally became evident that an adequate supply of electric current could be obtained by mechanical means; that is, by rotating conductors in such a manner that current would be generated within them as they cut through a magnetic field. Even the pioneer inventors of electric lamps made great contributions to electrical practice by developing the dynamo. Brush developed a satisfactory dynamo coincidental with his invention of the arc-lamp, and in a similar manner, Edison made a great contribution to electrical practice in devising means of generating and distributing electricity for the purpose of serving his filament lamp.
Between 1841 and 1848, several inventors tried to create light sources by heating metals. These basic lamps were powered using Grove and Bunsen electric cells, but no practical incandescent filament lamps were introduced until the electric dynamo was developed, providing a sufficient source of electric current. As electrical science advanced thanks to the ongoing work of scientists, it eventually became clear that a reliable supply of electric current could be produced mechanically—specifically by rotating conductors to generate current as they passed through a magnetic field. Even the early inventors of electric lamps made significant contributions to electrical practice by innovating the dynamo. Brush created a functional dynamo around the same time he invented the arc lamp, and similarly, Edison made a major impact on electrical practice by devising methods for generating and distributing electricity to power his filament lamp.

DIRECT CURRENT ARC
Most of the light being emitted by the positive (upper) electrode
DIRECT CURRENT ARC
Most of the light coming from the positive (upper) electrode

FLAME ARC
Most of the light being emitted by the flame
FLAME ARC
Most of the light produced by the flame
Edison in 1878 attacked the problem of producing light from a wire or filament heated electrically. He used platinum wire in his first experiments, but its volatility and low melting-point (3200°F.) limited the success of the lamps. Carbon with its extremely high melting-point had long attracted attention and in 1879 Edison produced a carbon filament by carbonizing a strip of paper. He sealed this in a vessel of glass from which the air was exhausted and the electric current was led to the filament through platinum wires sealed in the glass. Platinum was used because its expansion and contraction is about the same as glass. Incidentally, many improvements were made in incandescent lamps and thirty years passed before a material was found to replace the platinum leading-in wires. The cost of platinum steadily increased and finally in the present century a substitute was made by the use of two metals whose combined expansion was the same as that of platinum or glass. In 1879 and 1880 Edison had succeeded in overcoming the many difficulties sufficiently to give to the world a practicable incandescent filament lamp. About this time Swan and Stearn in England had also produced a successful lamp.
Edison in 1878 took on the challenge of creating light from a wire or filament heated by electricity. He started with platinum wire in his early experiments, but its volatility and low melting point (3200°F) limited the effectiveness of the lamps. Carbon, with its extremely high melting point, had always drawn interest, and in 1879 Edison created a carbon filament by carbonizing a strip of paper. He encased this in a glass vessel that had the air removed, and the electric current was connected to the filament through platinum wires sealed in the glass. Platinum was chosen because its expansion and contraction are close to that of glass. Over time, many improvements were made to incandescent lamps, and it took thirty years to find a material to replace the platinum leading wires. The price of platinum kept rising, and eventually, in the current century, a substitute was developed using two metals that expanded at the same rate as platinum or glass. By 1879 and 1880, Edison had managed to overcome many difficulties enough to offer the world a usable incandescent filament lamp. Around this time, Swan and Stearn in England also produced a successful lamp.

ON THE TESTING-RACKS OF THE MANUFACTURER OF INCANDESCENT
FILAMENT LAMPS
Thousands of lamps are burned out for the sake of making improvements. The
electrical energy used is equivalent to that consumed by a city of 30,000
inhabitants
ON THE TESTING-RACKS OF THE MANUFACTURER OF INCANDESCENT
FILAMENT LAMPS
Thousands of lamps are tested to make improvements. The electrical energy consumed is equivalent to what a city of 30,000 people uses.
In Edison's early experiments with filaments he used platinum wire coated with carbon but without much success. He also made thin rods of a mixture of finely divided metals such as platinum and iridium mixed with such oxides as magnesia, zirconia, and lime. He even coiled platinum wire around a piece of one of these oxides, with the aim of obtaining light from the wire and from the heated oxide. However, these experiments served little purpose besides indicating that the filament was best if it consisted solely of carbon and that it should be contained in an evacuated vessel.
In Edison's early experiments with filaments, he tried using platinum wire coated with carbon, but it didn’t work very well. He also created thin rods made from a mix of finely divided metals like platinum and iridium combined with oxides such as magnesia, zirconia, and lime. He even wrapped platinum wire around a piece of one of these oxides, hoping to generate light from both the wire and the heated oxide. However, these experiments mostly showed that the best filament was one made entirely of carbon and that it should be placed in an evacuated vessel.
One of the chief difficulties was to make the carbon filaments. Some of the pioneers, such as Sawyer and Mann, attempted to cut these from a piece of carbon. However, Edison and also Swan turned their attention to forming them by carbonizing a fiber of organic matter. Filaments cut from paper and threads of cotton and silk were carbonized for this purpose. Edison scoured the earth for better materials. He tried a fibrous grass from South America and various kinds of bamboo from other parts of the world. Thin filaments of split bamboo eventually proved the best material up to that time. He made many lamps containing filaments of this material, and even until 1910 bamboo was used to some extent in certain lamps.
One of the main challenges was creating the carbon filaments. Some early innovators, like Sawyer and Mann, tried cutting them from a piece of carbon. However, Edison and Swan focused on making them by carbonizing an organic fiber. They carbonized filaments made from paper, as well as threads of cotton and silk. Edison searched the world for better materials. He experimented with a fibrous grass from South America and different types of bamboo from various regions. Ultimately, thin filaments of split bamboo turned out to be the best material available at that time. He produced many lamps with filaments made from this material, and even up to 1910, bamboo was still used in some lamps.
Of these early days, Edison said:
Of those early days, Edison said:
It occurred to me that perhaps a filament of carbon could be made to stand in sealed glass vessels, or bulbs, which we were using, exhausted to a high vacuum. Separate lamps were made in this way independent of the air-pump, and, in October, 1879, we made lamps of paper carbon, and with carbons of common sewing thread, placed in a receiver or bulb made entirely of glass, with the leading-in wires sealed in by fusion. The whole thing was exhausted by the Sprengel pump to nearly one-millionth of an atmosphere. The filaments of carbon, although naturally quite fragile owing to their length and small mass, had a smaller radiating surface and higher resistance than we had dared hope. We had virtually reached the position and condition where the carbons were stable. In other words, the incandescent lamp as we still know it to-day [1904], in essentially all its particulars unchanged, had been born.
I realized that we could possibly create a carbon filament that fits into sealed glass containers, or bulbs, which we were using, evacuated to a high vacuum. We developed separate lamps this way, independent of the air pump, and in October 1879, we made lamps using paper carbon and regular sewing thread for the filaments, all placed in a fully glass bulb, with the leading wires sealed in through fusion. The entire setup was evacuated with the Sprengel pump to nearly one-millionth of an atmosphere. Although the carbon filaments were naturally quite fragile due to their length and small mass, they had a smaller radiating surface and higher resistance than we had hoped. We had effectively reached a point where the carbons were stable. In other words, the incandescent lamp as we still know it today [1904], with essentially all its details unchanged, was born.
After Edison's later success with bamboo, Swan invented a process of squirting filaments of nitrocellulose into a coagulating liquid, after which they are carbonized. Very fine uniform filaments can be made by this process and although improvements have been made from time to time, this method has been employed ever since its invention. In these later years cotton is dissolved in a suitable solvent such as a solution of zinc chloride and this material is forced through a small diamond die. This thread when hardened appears similar to cat-gut. It is cut into proper lengths and bent upon a form. It is then immersed in plumbago and heated to a high temperature in order to destroy the organic matter. A carbon filament is the result. From this point to the finished lamp many operations are performed, but a discussion of these would lead far afield. The production of a high vacuum is one of the most important processes and manufacturers of incandescent lamps have mastered the art perhaps more thoroughly than any other manufacturers. At least, their experience in this field made it possible for them to produce quickly and on a large scale such devices as X-ray tubes during the recent war.
After Edison's later success with bamboo, Swan created a method for injecting nitrocellulose filaments into a coagulating liquid, which are then carbonized. This process produces very fine uniform filaments, and although there have been improvements over the years, this method has been used ever since its invention. In recent years, cotton is dissolved in a suitable solvent like a zinc chloride solution, and this material is pushed through a small diamond die. When hardened, this thread looks similar to cat-gut. It is cut into appropriate lengths and shaped on a form. Then, it is immersed in plumbago and heated to a high temperature to eliminate the organic matter, resulting in a carbon filament. From this point to the finished lamp, many steps are carried out, but discussing them would take us too far off track. Creating a high vacuum is one of the most crucial processes, and manufacturers of incandescent lamps have mastered this technique perhaps more thoroughly than any other producers. Their expertise in this area enabled them to quickly and efficiently produce devices like X-ray tubes during the recent war.
During the early years of incandescent lamps, improvements were made from time to time which increased the life and the luminous efficiency of the carbon filaments, but it was not until 1906 that any radical improvement was achieved. In that year in this country a process was devised whereby the carbon filament was made more compact. In fact, from its appearance it received the name "metallized filament." These carbon filaments are prepared in the same manner as the earlier ones but are finally "treated" by heating in an atmosphere of hydrocarbons such as coal-gas. The filament is heated by electric current and the heat breaks down the hydrocarbons, with the result that carbon is deposited upon the filament. This "treated" filament has a coating of hard carbon and its electrical resistance is greater than that of the untreated filament.
During the early years of incandescent lamps, improvements were made from time to time that increased the lifespan and brightness of the carbon filaments, but it wasn't until 1906 that any major breakthrough occurred. In that year, a process was developed in this country that made the carbon filament more compact. In fact, because of its appearance, it was referred to as the "metallized filament." These carbon filaments are made in the same way as the earlier ones but are eventually "treated" by heating them in an atmosphere of hydrocarbons like coal gas. The filament is heated by an electric current, and the heat breaks down the hydrocarbons, which causes carbon to deposit on the filament. This "treated" filament has a coating of hard carbon and its electrical resistance is higher than that of the untreated filament.
The luminous efficiency of a carbon filament is a function of its temperature and it increases very rapidly with increasing temperature. For this reason it is a constant aim to reach high filament temperatures. Of all the materials used in filaments up to the present time, carbon possesses the highest melting-point (perhaps as high as 7000°F.), but the carbon filament as operated in practice has a lower efficiency than any other filament. This is because the highest temperature at which it can be operated and still have a reasonable life is much lower than that of metallic filaments. The incandescent carbon in the evacuated bulb sublimes or volatilizes and deposits upon the bulb. This decreases the size of the filament eventually to the breaking-point and the blackening of the bulb decreases the output of light. The treated filament was found to be a harder form of carbon that did not volatilize as rapidly as the untreated filament. It immediately became possible to operate it at a higher temperature with a resulting increase of luminous efficiency. This "graphitized" carbon filament lamp became known as the gem lamp in this country and many persons have wondered over the word "gem." The first two letters stand for "General Electric" and the last for "metallized." This lamp was welcomed with enthusiasm in its day, but the day for carbon filaments has passed. The advent of incandescent lamps of higher efficiency has made it uneconomical to use carbon lamps for general lighting purposes. Although the treated carbon filament was a great improvement, its reign was cut short by the appearance of metal filaments.
The light efficiency of a carbon filament depends on its temperature and increases rapidly as the temperature goes up. Because of this, the goal is always to achieve high filament temperatures. Among all the materials used in filaments so far, carbon has the highest melting point (possibly as high as 7000°F), but in practice, the carbon filament has lower efficiency than any other filament. This is due to the fact that the maximum temperature it can operate at while still having a reasonable lifespan is much lower than that of metallic filaments. The incandescent carbon inside the evacuated bulb sublimates or vaporizes and deposits on the bulb. This reduces the size of the filament until it eventually breaks, and the blackening of the bulb decreases the light output. The treated filament was found to be a harder form of carbon that didn't vaporize as quickly as the untreated filament. This allowed it to operate at a higher temperature, resulting in improved light efficiency. This "graphitized" carbon filament lamp became known as the gem lamp in this country, and many people have wondered about the term "gem." The first two letters refer to "General Electric," and the last part stands for "metallized." This lamp was enthusiastically welcomed in its time, but the era of carbon filaments has ended. The arrival of incandescent lamps with higher efficiency has made carbon lamps impractical for general lighting. While the treated carbon filament was a significant improvement, its dominance was short-lived due to the emergence of metal filaments.
In 1803 a new element was discovered and named tantalum. It is a dark, lustrous, hard metal. Pure tantalum is harder than steel; it may be drawn into fine wire; and its melting-point is very high (about 5100°F.). It is seen to possess properties desirable for filaments, but for some reason it did not attract attention for a long time. A century elapsed after its discovery before von Bolton produced the first tantalum filament lamp. Owing to the low electrical resistance of tantalum, a filament in order to operate satisfactorily on a standard voltage must be long and thin. This necessitates storing away a considerable length of wire in the bulb without permitting the loops to come into contact with each other. After the filaments have been in operation for a few hundred hours they become brittle and faults develop. When examined under a microscope, parts of the filament operated on alternating current appear to be offset. The explanation of this defect goes deeply into crystalline structure. The tantalum filament was quickly followed by osmium and by tungsten in this country.
In 1803, a new element was discovered and named tantalum. It is a dark, shiny, hard metal. Pure tantalum is harder than steel; it can be drawn into fine wire, and its melting point is very high (about 5100°F). It has properties that are ideal for filaments, but for some reason, it didn't get much attention for a long time. A century passed after its discovery before von Bolton created the first tantalum filament lamp. Because tantalum has low electrical resistance, a filament needs to be long and thin to work well on standard voltage. This means that a significant length of wire must be stored in the bulb without letting the loops touch each other. After the filaments have been running for a few hundred hours, they become brittle and develop faults. When looked at under a microscope, parts of the filament that operated on alternating current appear to be misaligned. The explanation for this defect delves deeply into its crystalline structure. The tantalum filament was soon followed by osmium and tungsten in this country.
The osmium filament appeared in 1905 and its invention is due to Welsbach, who had produced the marvelous gas-mantle. Owing to its extreme brittleness, osmium was finely divided and made into a paste of organic material. The filaments were squirted through dies and, after being formed and dried, they were heated to a high temperature. The organic matter disappeared and the fine metallic particles were sintered. This made a very brittle lamp, but its high efficiency served to introduce it.
The osmium filament was introduced in 1905, thanks to Welsbach, who created the remarkable gas mantle. Because osmium is incredibly brittle, it was broken down into a fine powder and mixed with an organic binder. The filaments were then pushed through molds and, after being shaped and dried, they were heated to a high temperature. The organic material burned away, and the tiny metallic particles fused together. This resulted in a very brittle lamp, but its high efficiency helped it gain popularity.
In 1870 when Scheele discovered a new element, known in this country as tungsten, no one realized that it was to revolutionize artificial lighting and to alter the course of some of the byways of civilization. This metal—which is known as "wolfram" in Germany, and to some extent in English-speaking countries—is one of the heaviest of elements, having a specific gravity of 19.1. It is 50 per cent. heavier than mercury and nearly twice as heavy as lead. It was early used in German silver to the extent of 1 or 2 per cent. to make platinoid, an alloy possessing a high resistance which varies only slightly as the temperature changes. This made an excellent material for electrical resistors. The melting-point of tungsten is about 5350°F., which makes it desirable for filaments, but it was very brittle as prepared in the early experiments. It unites very readily with oxygen and with carbon at high temperatures.
In 1870, when Scheele discovered a new element known in this country as tungsten, no one realized it would revolutionize artificial lighting and change the course of some aspects of civilization. This metal—called "wolfram" in Germany and somewhat in English-speaking countries—is one of the heaviest elements, with a specific gravity of 19.1. It is 50% heavier than mercury and nearly twice as heavy as lead. It was initially used in German silver at about 1 or 2% to create platinoid, an alloy with high resistance that changes only slightly with temperature. This made it an excellent material for electrical resistors. The melting point of tungsten is around 5350°F, making it ideal for filaments, but it was very brittle in early experiments. It readily combines with oxygen and carbon at high temperatures.
The first tungsten lamps appeared on the market in 1906, but these contained fragile filaments made by the squirting process. When the squirted filament of tungsten powder and organic matter was heated in an atmosphere of steam and hydrogen to remove the binding material, a brittle filament of tungsten was obtained. The first lamps were costly and fragile. After years of organized research tungsten is now drawn into the finest wires, possessing a tensile strength perhaps greater than any other material. Filaments are now made into many shapes and the greatest strides in artificial lighting have been due to scientific research on a huge scale.
The first tungsten lamps hit the market in 1906, but they had fragile filaments made through the squirting process. When the tungsten powder and organic matter were squirted and then heated in steam and hydrogen to eliminate the binding material, a brittle tungsten filament was created. The initial lamps were expensive and delicate. After years of dedicated research, tungsten is now drawn into incredibly fine wires, with tensile strength potentially surpassing any other material. Filaments are now produced in various shapes, and the biggest advancements in artificial lighting have come from extensive scientific research.
The achievements which combined to perfect the tungsten lamp to the point where it has become the mainstay of electric lighting are not attached to names in the Hall of Fame. Organization of scientific research in the industrial laboratories is such that often many persons contribute to the development of an improvement. Furthermore, time is usually required for a full perspective of applications of scientific knowledge. In the early days organized research was not practised and the great developments of those days were the works of individuals. To-day, even in pure science, some of the greatest contributions are made by industrial laboratories; but sometimes these do not become known to the public for many years. The whole scheme of scientific development has changed materially. For example, the story of the development of ductile tungsten, which has revolutionized lighting, is complex and more or less shrouded in secrecy at the present time. Many men have contributed toward this accomplishment and the public at the present time knows little more than the fact that tungsten filaments, which were brittle yesterday, are now made of ductile tungsten wire drawn into the finest filaments.
The achievements that led to the perfection of the tungsten lamp, making it a cornerstone of electric lighting, aren't linked to names in the Hall of Fame. The organization of scientific research in industrial labs means that often many people contribute to the development of an improvement. Additionally, it usually takes time to fully understand the applications of scientific knowledge. In the early days, organized research wasn't common, and the major breakthroughs of that time were the works of individuals. Today, even in pure science, some of the most significant contributions come from industrial labs; however, these often stay under the radar for many years. The entire landscape of scientific development has changed significantly. For instance, the development of ductile tungsten, which has transformed lighting, is complicated and largely kept confidential right now. Many individuals have played a role in this achievement, and the public currently knows little more than that tungsten filaments, which used to be brittle, are now made of ductile tungsten wire drawn into very fine filaments.
The earlier tungsten filaments were made by three rival processes. By the first, a deposit of tungsten was "flashed" on a fine carbon filament, the latter being eliminated finally by heating in an atmosphere of hydrogen and water-vapor. By the second, colloidal tungsten was produced by operating an arc between tungsten electrodes under water. The finely divided tungsten was gathered, partially dried, and squirted through dies to form filaments. These were then sintered. The third was the "paste" process already described. These methods produced fragile filaments, but their luminous efficiency was higher than that of previous ones. However, in this country ductile tungsten was soon on its way. An ingot of tungsten is subjected to vigorous swaging until it takes the form of a rod. This is finally drawn into wire.
The earlier tungsten filaments were created using three competing processes. In the first method, tungsten was "flashed" onto a fine carbon filament, which was then removed by heating in a hydrogen and water vapor environment. The second method involved producing colloidal tungsten by operating an arc between tungsten electrodes in water. The finely divided tungsten was collected, partially dried, and then pushed through dies to form filaments, which were subsequently sintered. The third method was the "paste" process previously described. Although these methods resulted in fragile filaments, their luminous efficiency was better than earlier versions. However, in this country, ductile tungsten was quickly being developed. A tungsten ingot is heavily swaged until it takes the shape of a rod, which is then drawn into wire.
Much of this development work was done by the laboratories of the General Electric Company and they were destined to contribute another great improvement. The blackening of the lamp bulbs was due to the evaporation of tungsten from the filament. All filaments up to this time had been confined in evacuated bulbs and the low pressure facilitates evaporation, as is well known. It had long been known that an inert gas in the bulb would reduce the evaporation and remedy other defects; however, under these conditions, there would be a considerable loss of energy through conduction of heat by the gases. In the vacuum lamp nearly all the electrical energy is converted into radiant energy, which is emitted by the filament and any dissipation of heat is an energy loss. A high vacuum was one of the chief aims up to this time, but a radical departure was pending.
Much of this development work was done by the laboratories of the General Electric Company, which were set to contribute another significant improvement. The darkening of the lamp bulbs was caused by the evaporation of tungsten from the filament. Until now, all filaments had been enclosed in vacuum bulbs, and the low pressure makes evaporation easier, as is well known. It was long understood that adding an inert gas in the bulb would reduce evaporation and fix other issues; however, in such conditions, there would be a considerable loss of energy due to heat conduction by the gases. In the vacuum lamp, almost all electrical energy is converted into radiant energy, which is emitted by the filament, and any heat loss is an energy loss. Achieving a high vacuum had been one of the main goals until now, but a major change was imminent.
If an ordinary tungsten-lamp bulb be filled with an inert gas such as nitrogen, the filament may be operated at a very much higher temperature without any more deterioration than takes place in a vacuum at a lower temperature. This gives a more efficient light but a less efficient lamp. The greater output of light is compensated by losses by conduction of heat through the gas. In other words, a great deal more energy is required by the filament in order to remain at a given temperature in a gas than in a vacuum. However, elaborate studies of the dependence of heat-losses upon the size and shape of the filament and of the physics of conduction from a solid to a gas, established the foundation for the gas-filled tungsten lamp. The knowledge gained in these investigations indicated that a thicker filament lost a relatively less percentage of energy by conduction than a thin one for equal amounts of emitted light. However, a practical filament must have sufficient resistance to be used safely on lighting circuits already established and, therefore, the large diameter and high resistance were obtained by making a helical coil of a fine wire. In fact, the gas-filled tungsten lamp may be thought of as an ordinary lamp with its long filament made into a short helical coil and the bulb filled with nitrogen or argon gas.
If a regular tungsten light bulb is filled with an inert gas like nitrogen, the filament can operate at a much higher temperature without deteriorating more than it would in a vacuum at a lower temperature. This produces more efficient light but makes the lamp less efficient. The increased light output is offset by heat loss through the gas. In other words, the filament requires significantly more energy to maintain a certain temperature in gas than in a vacuum. However, extensive studies on how heat losses depend on the filament's size and shape, as well as the physics of heat conduction from a solid to a gas, laid the groundwork for the gas-filled tungsten lamp. The insights gained from these studies showed that a thicker filament lost a smaller percentage of energy through conduction compared to a thin one for the same light output. Still, a functional filament needs to have enough resistance to safely work with existing lighting circuits, so the larger diameter and high resistance were achieved by creating a helical coil out of fine wire. In essence, the gas-filled tungsten lamp can be seen as a standard lamp with its long filament turned into a short helical coil, with the bulb filled with nitrogen or argon gas.
This development was not accidental and from a scientific point of view it is not spectacular. It did not mark a new discovery in the same sense as the discovery of X-rays. However, it is an excellent example of the great rewards which come to systematic, thorough study of rather commonplace physical laws in respect to a given condition. Such achievements are being duplicated in various lines in the laboratories of the industries. Scientific research is no longer monopolized by educational institutions. The most elaborate and best-equipped laboratories are to be found in the industries sometimes surrounded by the smoke and noise and vigorous activity which indicate that achievements of the laboratory are on their way to mankind. The smoke-laden industrial district, pulsating with life, is the proud exhibit of the present civilization. It is the creation of those who discover, organize, and apply scientific facts. But how many appreciate the debt that mankind owes not only to the individual who dedicates his life to science but to the far-sighted manufacturer who risks his money in organized quest of new benefits for mankind? A glimpse into a vast organization of research, which, for example, has been mainly responsible for the progress of the incandescent lamp would alter the attitude of many persons toward science and toward the large industrial companies.
This development wasn’t random, and from a scientific perspective, it’s not groundbreaking. It didn’t represent a new discovery like the discovery of X-rays did. However, it’s a great example of the significant rewards that come from methodical, in-depth study of fairly ordinary physical laws under specific conditions. Such achievements are being replicated in various fields within industrial laboratories. Scientific research is no longer just the domain of educational institutions. The most advanced and well-equipped labs can now be found in industries, often surrounded by the smoke, noise, and energetic activity that indicate laboratory achievements are making their way to society. The smoke-filled industrial area, alive with activity, is a proud showcase of modern civilization. It’s the result of those who discover, organize, and apply scientific knowledge. But how many people recognize the debt humanity owes not just to the individuals who dedicate their lives to science, but also to the visionary manufacturers who invest their money in the organized search for new benefits for humanity? A look into a vast research organization, which, for example, has largely driven the progress of the incandescent lamp, would change the way many people view science and large industrial companies.
The progress in the development of electric incandescent lamps is shown in the following table, where the dates and values are more or less approximate. It should be understood that from 1880 to the present time there has been a steady progress, which occasionally has been greatly augmented by sudden steps.
The advancement in the creation of electric incandescent lamps is illustrated in the following table, where the dates and values are roughly estimated. It's important to recognize that from 1880 to now, there has been continuous progress, sometimes significantly boosted by major breakthroughs.
Approximate Values
Estimated Values
Date | Filament | Temperature | Lumens per watt |
---|---|---|---|
1880 | Carbon | 3300°F. | 3.0 |
1906 | Carbon (graphitized) | 3400 | 4.5 |
1905 | Tantalum | 3550 | 6.5 |
1905 | Osmium | 3600 | 7.5 |
1906 | Tungsten (vacuum) | 3700 | 8.0 |
1914 | Tungsten (gas-filled) | up to 5300°F. | 10 to 25 |
Throughout the development of incandescent filament lamps many ingenious experiments were made which resulted usually in light-sources of scientific interest but not of practical value. One of the latest is the tungsten arc in an inert gas. By means of a heating coil, a small arc is started between two electrodes consisting of tungsten, but this as yet has not been shown to be practicable.
Throughout the development of incandescent filament lamps, many clever experiments were conducted that usually led to light sources of scientific interest but not practical use. One of the latest is the tungsten arc in an inert gas. A heating coil initiates a small arc between two tungsten electrodes, but this has not yet been proven to be practical.
Another type of filament lamp was developed by Nernst in 1897. It was an ingenious application of the peculiar properties of rare-earth oxides. His first lamp consisted essentially of a slender rod of magnesia. This substance does not conduct electricity at ordinary temperatures, but when heated to incandescence it becomes conducting. Upon sufficient heating of this filament by external means while a proper voltage is impressed upon it, the electric current passes through it and thereafter this current will maintain its temperature. Thus such a filament becomes a conductor and will continue to glow brilliantly by virtue of the electrical energy which it converts into heat. Later lamps consisted of "glowers" about one inch long made from a mixture of zirconia and yttria, and finally a mixture of ceria, thoria, and zirconia was used. The glower is heated initially by a coil of platinum wire located near it but not in contact with it. Owing to the fact that this glower decreases rapidly in resistance as its temperature is increased, it is necessary to place in series with it a substance which increases in resistance with increasing current. This is called a "ballasting resistance" and is usually an iron wire in a glass bulb containing hydrogen. The heater is cut out by an electromagnet when the glower goes into operation. This lamp is a marvel of ingenuity and when at its zenith it was installed to a considerable extent. Its light is considerably whiter than that of the carbon filament lamps. However, its doom was sounded when metallic filament lamps appeared.
Another type of filament lamp was created by Nernst in 1897. It was a clever application of the unique properties of rare-earth oxides. His first lamp was basically a thin rod of magnesia. This material doesn't conduct electricity at ordinary temperatures, but when heated to incandescence, it becomes a conductor. Once the filament is heated sufficiently by external means while a proper voltage is applied, electric current flows through it, and this current will keep the temperature up. This way, the filament acts as a conductor and continues to glow brightly because of the electrical energy it transforms into heat. Later lamps used "glowers" about one inch long, made from a mix of zirconia and yttria, and eventually, a combination of ceria, thoria, and zirconia was used. The glower is initially heated by a coil of platinum wire that's near it but not touching it. Because this glower quickly decreases in resistance as its temperature rises, it's necessary to connect a material in series with it that increases in resistance as current increases. This is called a "ballasting resistance" and is typically made of iron wire in a glass bulb filled with hydrogen. The heater is turned off by an electromagnet when the glower starts working. This lamp is a remarkable feat of ingenuity, and at its peak, it was widely used. Its light is much whiter than that of carbon filament lamps. However, its fate was sealed when metallic filament lamps were introduced.
An interesting filament was developed by Parker and Clark by using as a core a small filament of carbon. This flashed in an atmosphere containing a vapor of a compound of silicon, became coated with silicon. This filament was of high specific resistance and appeared to have promise. It has not been introduced commercially and doubtless it cannot compete with the latest tungsten lamps.
An interesting filament was created by Parker and Clark using a small carbon filament as the core. This filament was exposed to an atmosphere with silicon compound vapor, which caused it to be coated in silicon. This filament had high specific resistance and seemed promising. However, it has not been brought to market and likely cannot compete with the latest tungsten lamps.
Electric incandescent lamps are the present mainstay of electric illumination and, it might be stated, of progress in lighting. Wonderful achievements have been accomplished in other modes of lighting and the foregoing statement is not meant to depreciate those achievements. However, the incandescent filament lamp has many inherent advantages. The light-source is enclosed in an air-tight bulb which makes for a safe, convenient lamp. The filament is capable of subdivision, with the result that such lamps vary from the minutest spark of the smallest miniature lamp to the enormous output of the largest gas-filled tungsten lamp. The outputs of these are respectively a fraction of a lumen and twenty-five thousand lumens; that is, the luminous intensity varies from an equivalent of a small fraction of a standard candle to a single light-source emitting light equivalent to two thousand standard candles.
Electric incandescent lamps are currently the backbone of electric lighting and, you could say, the key to advancements in illumination. Amazing progress has been made in other lighting technologies, and this isn’t meant to undermine those developments. Still, the incandescent filament lamp has many built-in advantages. The light source is enclosed in a sealed bulb, making for a safe and convenient lamp. The filament can be divided, resulting in lamps that range from the tiniest spark of a small miniature lamp to the high output of the largest gas-filled tungsten lamp. The outputs of these range from just a fraction of a lumen to twenty-five thousand lumens; in other words, the brightness goes from the small equivalent of a standard candle to a single light source that shines as brightly as two thousand standard candles.
Statistics are cold facts and are usually uninteresting in a volume of this character, but they tell a story in a concise manner. The development of the modern incandescent lamp has increased the intensity of light available with a great decrease in cost, and this progressive development is shown easily by tables. For example, since the advent of the tungsten lamp the average candle-power and luminous efficiency of all the lamps sold in this country has steadily increased, while the average wattages of the lamps have remained virtually stationary.
Statistics might seem like cold, dull facts in a text like this, but they tell a story clearly and briefly. The advancement of the modern incandescent lamp has significantly boosted the brightness of light available at a much lower cost, and this ongoing progress is easily illustrated by tables. For instance, since the introduction of the tungsten lamp, the average candle power and luminous efficiency of all the lamps sold in the U.S. have consistently risen, while the average wattage of the lamps has stayed almost the same.
Year | Candle-power | Watts | Lumens per watt |
---|---|---|---|
1907 | 18.0 | 53 | 3.33 |
1908 | 19.0 | 53 | 3.52 |
1909 | 21.0 | 52 | 3.96 |
1910 | 23.0 | 51 | 4.42 |
1911 | 25.0 | 51 | 4.82 |
1912 | 26.0 | 49 | 5.20 |
1913 | 29.4 | 47 | 6.13 |
1914 | 38.2 | 48 | 7.80 |
1915 | 42.2 | 47 | 8.74 |
1916 | 45.8 | 49 | 9.60 |
1917 | 48.7 | 52 | 10.56 |
It will be noted that the luminous intensity of incandescent filament lamps has steadily increased since the carbon lamp was superseded, and that in a period of ten years of organized research behind the tungsten lamp the luminous efficiency (lumens per watt) has trebled. In other words, everything else remaining unchanged, the cost of light in ten years was reduced to one third. But the reduction in cost has been more than this, as will be shown later. During the same span of years the percentage of carbon filament lamps of the total filament lamps sold decreased from 100 per cent. in 1907 to 13 per cent. in 1917. At the same time the percentage of tungsten (Mazda) lamps increased from virtually zero in 1907 to about 87 per cent. in 1917. The tantalum lamp had no opportunity to become established, because the tungsten lamp followed its appearance very closely. In 1910 the sales of the former reached their highest mark, which was only 3.5 per cent. of all the lamps sold in the United States. From a lowly beginning the number of incandescent filament lamps sold for use in this country has grown rapidly, reaching nearly two hundred million in 1919.
It’s important to note that the brightness of incandescent filament lamps has steadily increased since the carbon lamp was phased out, and over a ten-year period of focused research on the tungsten lamp, the luminous efficiency (lumens per watt) has tripled. In other words, with everything else staying the same, the cost of light over ten years has been reduced to one-third. But the cost reduction has been even more significant, as will be explained later. During the same time, the share of carbon filament lamps in total filament lamp sales dropped from 100% in 1907 to 13% in 1917. Meanwhile, the percentage of tungsten (Mazda) lamps rose from almost zero in 1907 to about 87% in 1917. The tantalum lamp didn't have a chance to become popular because the tungsten lamp debuted shortly after. In 1910, the sales of the former reached their peak, which was only 3.5% of all the lamps sold in the United States. From a modest start, the number of incandescent filament lamps sold for use in this country has surged, reaching nearly two hundred million in 1919.
XI
THE LIGHT OF THE FUTURE
In viewing the development of artificial light and its manifold effects upon the activities of mankind, it is natural to look into the future. Jules Verne possessed the advantage of being able to write into fiction what his riotous imagination dictated, and so much of what he pictured has come true that his success tempts one to do likewise in prophesying the future of lighting. Surely a forecast based alone upon the past achievements and the present indications will fall short of the actual realizations of the future! If the imagination is permitted to view the future without restrictions, many apparently far-fetched schemes may be devised. It may be possible to turn to nature's supply of daylight and to place some of it in storage for night use. One millionth part of daylight released as desired at night would illuminate sufficiently all of man's nocturnal activities. The fictionist need not heed the scientist's inquiry as to how this daylight would be bottled. Instead of giving time to such inquiries he would pass on to another scheme, whereby earth would be belted with optical devices so that day could never leave. When the sun was shining in China its light would be gathered on a large scale and sent eastward and westward in these great optical "pipe-lines" to the regions of darkness, thus banishing night forever. The writer of fiction need not bother with a consideration of the economic situation which would demand such efforts. This line of conjecture is interesting, for it may suggest possibilities toward which the present trend of artificial lighting does not point; however, the author is constrained to treat the future of light-production on a somewhat more conservative basis.
In looking at the development of artificial light and how it impacts human activities, it's natural to think about the future. Jules Verne had the advantage of writing fiction based on his vivid imagination, and so much of what he envisioned has come true that it’s tempting to make similar predictions about the future of lighting. Relying solely on past achievements and current trends is likely to underestimate the real possibilities ahead! If we let our imagination explore the future freely, many seemingly outrageous ideas might emerge. For instance, we could harness daylight from nature and store some of it for nighttime use. Just one-millionth of daylight released when needed at night could adequately light all of our nighttime activities. A fiction writer doesn’t need to concern themselves with the scientist’s questions about how this daylight would be contained. Instead of wasting time on such inquiries, the writer could move on to another idea, like surrounding the Earth with optical devices so that day would never end. When the sun is shining in China, its light could be collected on a large scale and transmitted east and west through these giant optical "pipelines" to areas of darkness, effectively eliminating night forever. The fiction writer doesn’t need to worry about the economic implications that would come with such endeavors. This line of thinking is intriguing as it may point toward possibilities that current artificial lighting trends don’t highlight; however, the author must approach the future of light production with a more conservative perspective.
At the present time the light-source of chief interest in electric lighting is the incandescent filament lamp; but its luminous efficiency is limited, as has been shown in a previous chapter. When light is emitted by virtue of its temperature much invisible radiant energy accompanies the visible energy. The highest luminous efficiency attainable by pure temperature radiation will be reached when the temperature of a normal radiator reaches the vicinity of 10,000°F. to 11,000°F. The melting-points of metals are much lower than this. The tungsten filament in the most efficient lamps employing it is operating near its melting-point at the present time. Carbon is a most attractive element in respect to melting-point, for it melts at a temperature between 6000°F. and 7000°F. Even this is far below the most efficient temperature for the production of light by means of pure temperature radiation. There are possibilities of higher efficiency being obtained by operating arcs or filaments under pressure; however, it appears that highly efficient light of the future will result from a radical departure.
Currently, the main focus in electric lighting is the incandescent filament lamp; however, its luminous efficiency is limited, as discussed in an earlier chapter. When light is produced based on temperature, a significant amount of invisible radiant energy is also emitted alongside the visible light. The highest luminous efficiency achievable through pure temperature radiation occurs when a normal radiator reaches temperatures around 10,000°F to 11,000°F. The melting points of metals are much lower than that. The tungsten filament in the most efficient lamps using it operates close to its melting point right now. Carbon is quite appealing in terms of melting point, melting at temperatures between 6000°F and 7000°F. Even this is still far below the optimal temperature for generating light through pure temperature radiation. There are opportunities for achieving higher efficiency by running arcs or filaments under pressure; however, it seems that highly efficient lighting in the future will come from a significant shift in approach.
Scientists are becoming more and more intimate with the structure of matter. They are learning secrets every year which apparently are leading to a fundamental knowledge of the subject. When these mysteries are solved, who can say that man will not be able to create elements to suit his needs, or at least to alter the properties of the elements already available? If he could so alter the mechanism of radiation that a hot metal would radiate no invisible energy, he would have made a tremendous stride even in the production of light by virtue of high temperature. This property of selective radiation is possessed by some elements to a slight degree, but if treatment could enhance this property, luminous efficiency would be greatly increased. Certainly the principle of selectivity is a byway of possibilities.
Scientists are getting more familiar with the structure of matter. They are discovering new insights every year that are apparently leading to a deeper understanding of the topic. When these mysteries are unraveled, who can say that humans won't be able to create elements to meet their needs or at least change the properties of the elements we already have? If they could alter the mechanism of radiation so that a hot metal didn’t emit any invisible energy, it would be a huge advancement, even in producing light from high temperatures. Some elements already have this property of selective radiation to a small extent, but if enhancements could be made, luminous efficiency would significantly improve. Clearly, the principle of selectivity opens up many possibilities.
A careful study of commonplace factors may result in a great step in light-production without the creation of new elements or compounds, just as such a procedure doubled the luminous efficiency of the tungsten filament when the gas-filled lamp appeared. There are a few elements still missing, according to the Periodic Law which has been so valuable in chemistry. When these turn up, they may be found to possess valuable properties for light-production; but this is a discouraging byway.
A careful examination of common factors could lead to significant advances in light production without needing to create new elements or compounds, just like how this approach doubled the brightness of the tungsten filament when gas-filled lamps were introduced. According to the Periodic Law, which has been incredibly helpful in chemistry, there are still a few elements that haven't been discovered. When these are found, they might have useful properties for producing light, but this is a frustrating detour.
It is natural to inquire whether or not any mode of light-production now in use has a limiting luminous efficiency approaching the ultimate limit which is imposed by the visibility of radiation. The eye is able to convert radiant energy of different wave-lengths into certain fixed proportions of light. For example, radiant energy of such a wave-length as to excite the sensation of yellow-green is the most efficient and one watt of this energy is capable of being converted by the visual apparatus into about 625 lumens of light. Is this efficiency of conversion of the visual apparatus everlastingly fixed? For the answer it is necessary to turn to the physiologist, and doubtless he would suggest the curbing of the imagination. But is it unthinkable that the visual processes will always be beyond the control of man? However, to turn again to the physics of light-production, there are still several processes of producing light which are appealing.
It’s natural to ask whether any current method of producing light has a luminous efficiency close to the ultimate limit set by our ability to see radiation. The eye can turn radiant energy of different wavelengths into specific amounts of light. For instance, radiant energy that stimulates the sensation of yellow-green is the most effective; one watt of this energy can be converted by our visual system into about 625 lumens of light. Is this efficiency in conversion of our visual system fixed forever? To find the answer, we should consult a physiologist, who would likely advise tempering our imagination. But is it that far-fetched to believe that visual processes will always be beyond human control? Nevertheless, returning to the physics of light production, there are still several intriguing methods of generating light.
Many years ago Geissler, Crookes, and other scientists studied the spectra of gases excited to incandescence by the electric discharge in so-called vacuum tubes. The gases are placed in transparent glass or quartz tubes at rather low pressures and a high voltage is impressed upon the ends of these tubes. When the pressure is sufficiently low, the gases will glow and emit light. Twenty-eight years ago, D. McFarlan Moore developed the nitrogen tube, which was actually installed in various places. But there is such a loss of energy near the cathode that short "vacuum" tubes of this character are very inefficient producers of light. Efficiency is greatly increased by lengthening the tubes, so Moore used tubes of great length and a rather high voltage. As a tube of this sort is used, the gas gradually disappears and it must be replenished. In order to replenish the gas, Moore devised a valve for feeding gas automatically. An advantage of this mode of light-production is that the color or quality of the light may be varied by varying the gas used. Nitrogen yields a pinkish light; neon an orange light; and carbon dioxide a white light. Moore's carbon-dioxide tube is an excellent substitute for daylight and has been used for the discrimination of colors where this is an important factor. However, for this purpose devices utilizing color-screens which alter the light from the tungsten lamp to a daylight quality are being used extensively.
Many years ago, Geissler, Crookes, and other scientists studied the spectra of gases that were heated to incandescence by electric discharge in vacuum tubes. The gases are placed in transparent glass or quartz tubes at relatively low pressures, and a high voltage is applied to the ends of these tubes. When the pressure is low enough, the gases glow and emit light. Twenty-eight years ago, D. McFarlan Moore developed the nitrogen tube, which was actually installed in various places. But there is such a loss of energy near the cathode that short "vacuum" tubes of this kind are very inefficient at producing light. Efficiency is significantly improved by making the tubes longer, so Moore used very long tubes with a fairly high voltage. As these tubes are used, the gas gradually diminishes, and it needs to be replenished. To replenish the gas, Moore invented a valve for automatically feeding gas. One advantage of this method of producing light is that the color or quality of the light can be changed by using different gases. Nitrogen produces a pinkish light; neon gives off an orange light; and carbon dioxide emits a white light. Moore's carbon-dioxide tube is a great substitute for daylight and has been used to distinguish colors where this is crucial. However, for this purpose, devices that use color screens to change the light from tungsten lamps to a daylight quality are being widely used.
The vacuum-tube method of producing light has an advantage in the selection of a gas among a large number of possibilities, and some of the color effects of the future may be obtained by means of it. Claude has lately worked on light-production by vacuum tubes and has combined the neon tube with the mercury-vapor tube. The spectrum of neon to a large extent compensates for the absence of red light in the mercury spectrum, with a result that the mixture produces a more satisfactory light than that of either tube. However, this mode of light-production has not proved practicable in its present state of development. Fundamentally the limitations are those of the inherent spectral characteristics of gases. Doubtless the possibilities of the mechanisms of the tubes and of combining various gases have not been exhausted. Furthermore, if man ever becomes capable of controlling to some extent the structure of elements and of compounds, this method of light-production is perhaps more promising than others of the present day.
The vacuum-tube method of producing light has an advantage in choosing from a wide variety of gases, and some of the color effects of the future could come from it. Claude has recently worked on light production using vacuum tubes and has combined the neon tube with the mercury-vapor tube. The spectrum of neon largely compensates for the lack of red light in the mercury spectrum, resulting in a more satisfying light than either tube alone. However, this method of producing light isn't practical yet in its current state of development. The main limitations are due to the natural spectral characteristics of the gases. Surely, the potential of the mechanisms of the tubes and the combination of different gases is not fully explored. Moreover, if humans ever manage to control the structure of elements and compounds to some degree, this method of light production might be more promising than the current options.
There is another attractive method of producing light and it has not escaped the writer of fiction. H. G. Wells, with his rare skill and with the license so often envied by the writer of facts, has drawn upon the characteristics of fluorescence and phosphorescence. In his story "The First Men in the Moon," the inhabitants of the moon illuminate their caverns by utilizing this phenomenon. A fluorescent liquid was prepared in large quantities. It emitted a brilliant phosphorescent glow and when it splashed on the feet of the earth-men it felt cold, but it glowed for a long time. This is a possibility of the future and many have had visions of such lighting. If the ceiling of a coal-mine was lined with glowing fireflies or with phosphorescent material excited in some manner, it would be possible to see fairly well with the dark-adapted eyes.
There’s another appealing way to create light, and it hasn't gone unnoticed by fiction writers. H. G. Wells, with his unique talent and the freedom often envied by non-fiction writers, has tapped into the traits of fluorescence and phosphorescence. In his story "The First Men in the Moon," the inhabitants of the moon light up their caverns using this phenomenon. A fluorescent liquid was made in large amounts. It gave off a bright phosphorescent glow and when it splashed on the earth-men's feet, it felt cold, yet it glowed for a long time. This is a potential future, and many have imagined such lighting. If the ceiling of a coal mine were lined with glowing fireflies or with some kind of phosphorescent material activated in some way, it would be possible to see quite well with eyes adjusted to the dark.
This leads to the class of phenomena included under the general term "luminescence." The definition of this term is not thoroughly agreed upon, but light produced in this manner does not depend upon temperature in the sense that a glowing tungsten filament emits light because it is sufficiently hot. A phosphorus match rubbed in the moist palm of the hand is seen to glow, although it is at an ordinary temperature. This may be termed "chemi-luminescence." Sidot blende, Balmain's paint, and many other compounds, when illuminated with ordinary light, and especially with ultra-violet and violet rays, will continue to glow for a long time. Despite their brightness they will be cold to the touch. This phenomenon would be termed "photo-luminescence," although it is better known as "phosphorescence." It should be noted that the latter term was carelessly originated, for phosphorus has nothing to do with it. The glow of the Geissler tube or electrically excited gas at low pressure would be an example of "electro-luminescence." The luminosity of various salts in the Bunsen-flame is due to so-called luminescence and there are many other examples of light-production which are included in the same general class. Inasmuch as light is emitted from comparatively cold bodies in these cases, it is popularly known as "cold" light.
This brings us to a group of phenomena known as "luminescence." The exact definition of this term isn't universally accepted, but light produced in this way doesn't rely on temperature, like how a glowing tungsten filament emits light because it’s hot enough. A phosphorus match rubbed against the damp palm of your hand glows, even though it's at a normal temperature. This can be called "chemi-luminescence." Sidot blende, Balmain's paint, and many other compounds, when exposed to regular light, especially ultraviolet and violet rays, will keep glowing for a long time. Despite their brightness, they feel cold to the touch. This effect is called "photo-luminescence," more commonly referred to as "phosphorescence." It's worth mentioning that the term "phosphorescence" was inaccurately coined, as phosphorus isn’t involved. The glow from a Geissler tube or gas excited by electricity at low pressure is an example of "electro-luminescence." The luminosity of various salts in a Bunsen flame is due to so-called luminescence, and there are many other instances of light production that fall under this general category. Because light is emitted from relatively cool objects in these cases, it’s often referred to as "cold" light.
There are many instances of light being emitted without being accompanied by appreciable amounts of invisible radiant energy and it is natural to hope for practical possibilities in this direction. As yet little is known regarding the efficiency of light-production by phosphorescence. The luminous efficiency of the radiant energy emitted by phosphorescent substances has been studied, but it seems strange that among the vast works on phosphorescent phenomena, scarcely any mention is made of the efficiency of producing light in this manner. For example, assume that phosphorescent zinc sulphide is excited by the light from a mercury-arc. All the energy falling upon it is not capable of exciting phosphorescence, as may be readily shown. Assuming that a known amount of radiant energy of a certain wave-length has been permitted to fall upon the phosphorescent material, then in the dark the latter may be seen to glow for a long time. An interesting point to investigate is the relation of the output to input; that is, the ratio of the total emitted light to the total exciting energy. This is a neglected aspect in the study of light-production by this means.
There are many cases where light is produced without significant amounts of invisible radiant energy, and it's natural to look for practical applications in this area. So far, we know very little about how efficiently light is produced through phosphorescence. Although the luminous efficiency of the radiant energy released by phosphorescent materials has been examined, it’s odd that among the extensive research on phosphorescent phenomena, there's hardly any mention of how effectively light is produced this way. For instance, if we take phosphorescent zinc sulfide and excite it with light from a mercury-arc, not all the energy hitting it can actually trigger phosphorescence, which can be easily demonstrated. If a specific amount of radiant energy of a certain wavelength is allowed to strike the phosphorescent material, we can see it glow in the dark for a long time. An intriguing area to explore is the relationship between output and input; that is, the ratio of the total emitted light to the total exciting energy. This is an overlooked factor in the study of light production through this method.
The firefly has been praised far and wide as the ideal light-source. It is an efficient radiator of light, for its light is "cold"; that is, it does not appear to be accompanied by invisible radiant energy. But little is said about its efficiency as a light-producer. Who knows how much fuel its lighting-plant consumes? The chemistry of light-production by living organisms is being unraveled and this part of the phenomenon will likely be laid bare before long. For an equal amount of energy radiated, the firefly emits a great many times more light than the most efficient lamp in use at the present time, but before the firefly is pronounced ideal, the efficiency of its light-producing process must be known.
The firefly is widely celebrated as the perfect light source. It’s an efficient light radiator because its light is "cold," meaning it doesn’t seem to produce any invisible radiant energy. However, not much is mentioned about how efficient it is at producing light. Who knows how much fuel its light system uses? Scientists are beginning to understand the chemistry behind light production in living organisms, and we’ll likely learn more about this soon. For the same amount of energy emitted, the firefly gives off many times more light than the most efficient lamp available today, but we need to understand the efficiency of its light-producing process before calling it ideal.
There are many ways of exciting phosphorescence and fluorescence, the latter being merely an unenduring phosphorescence, which ceases when the exciting energy is cut off. Ultra-violet, violet, and blue rays are generally the most effective radiant energy for excitation purposes. X-rays and the high-frequency discharge are also powerful excitants. As already stated, virtually nothing is known of the efficiency of this mode of light-production or of the mechanism within the substance, but on the whole it is a remarkable phenomenon.
There are many ways to trigger phosphorescence and fluorescence, with the latter being just a temporary form of phosphorescence that stops when the exciting energy is removed. Ultraviolet, violet, and blue rays are usually the most effective types of radiant energy for this purpose. X-rays and high-frequency discharges are also strong stimulators. As mentioned before, very little is known about the efficiency of this light-producing method or the processes happening within the substance, but overall, it's a fascinating phenomenon.
Radium is also a possibility in light-production and in fact has been practically employed for this purpose for several years. It or one of its compounds is mixed with a phosphorescent substance such as zinc sulphide and the latter glows continuously. Inasmuch as the life of some of the radium products is very long, such a method of illuminating watch-dials, scales of instruments, etc., is very practicable where they are to be read by eyes adapted to darkness and consequently highly sensitive to light. Whether or not radium will be manufactured by the ton in the future can only conjectured.
Radium is also a potential option for light production and has actually been used for this purpose for several years. It, or one of its compounds, is combined with a phosphorescent substance like zinc sulfide, which then glows continuously. Since the lifespan of some radium products is very long, this method of lighting watch dials, instrument scales, etc., is very practical for situations where they need to be read by eyes adjusted to darkness and therefore highly sensitive to light. Whether radium will be produced by the ton in the future is still uncertain.
Owing to the limitations imposed by physical laws of radiation and by the physiological processes of vision the highest luminous efficiency obtainable by heating solid materials is only about 15 per cent. of the luminous efficiency of the most luminous radiant energy. At present there are no materials available which may be operated at the temperature necessary to reach even this efficiency. Great progress in the future of light-production as indicated by present knowledge appears to lie in the production of light which is unaccompanied by invisible radiant energy. At present such phenomena as fluorescence, phosphorescence, the light of the firefly, chemi-luminescence, etc., are examples of this kind of light-production. Of course, if science ever obtains control over the constitution of matter, many difficulties will disappear; for then man will not be dependent upon the elements and compounds now available but will be able to modify them to suit his needs.
Due to the limits set by the physical laws of radiation and how our vision works, the maximum luminous efficiency we can achieve by heating solid materials is only about 15 percent of the efficiency of the brightest radiant energy. Right now, there are no materials that can withstand the temperatures needed to achieve even this level of efficiency. The future of light production, based on what we know today, seems to lie in creating light without producing invisible radiant energy. Currently, examples of this kind of light production include phenomena like fluorescence, phosphorescence, the glow of fireflies, and chemiluminescence. Of course, if science ever gains control over the structure of matter, many challenges will be resolved; then people won’t have to rely on the elements and compounds currently available but will be able to modify them to meet their needs.
XII
LIGHTING THE STREETS
In this age of brilliantly lighted boulevards and "great white ways" flooded with light from shop-windows, electric signs, and street-lamps, it is difficult to visualize the gloom which shrouded the streets a century ago. As the belated pedestrian walks along the suburban highways in comparative safety under adequate artificial lighting, he will realize the great influence of artificial light upon civilization if he recalls that not more than two centuries ago in London
In this era of brightly lit streets and "great white ways" illuminated by shop windows, neon signs, and streetlights, it's hard to imagine the darkness that covered the streets a century ago. As the late-night walker strolls along the suburban roads in relative safety under ample artificial lighting, they will understand the significant impact of artificial light on society if they remember that just two centuries ago in London
it was a common practice ... that a hundred or more in a company, young and old, would make nightly invasions upon houses of the wealthy to the intent to rob them and that when night was come no man durst adventure to walk in the streets.
It was a common practice that a hundred or more people, young and old, would invade the houses of the wealthy at night with the intent to rob them, and when night fell, nobody dared to walk the streets.
Inhabitants of the cities of the present time are inclined to think that crime is common on the streets at night, but what would it be without adequate artificial light? Two centuries ago in a city like London a smoking grease-lamp, a candle, or a basket of pine knots here and there afforded the only street-lighting, and these were extinguished by eleven o'clock. Lawlessness was hatched and hidden by darkness, and even the lantern or torch served more to mark the victim than to protect him. It has been said in describing the conditions of the age of dark streets that everybody signed his will and was prepared for death before he left his home. By comparison with the present, one is again encouraged to believe that the world grows better. Doubtless, artificial light projected into the crannies has had something to do with this change.
Inhabitants of today’s cities often believe that crime is common on the streets at night, but what would it be like without enough artificial light? Two centuries ago, in a city like London, the only street lighting came from a smoking grease lamp, a candle, or a few baskets of pine knots scattered around, and these were put out by eleven o'clock. Lawlessness thrived and hid in the darkness, and even a lantern or torch did more to highlight the victim than to protect them. It’s been said that during the era of dark streets, everyone signed their will and was ready for death before leaving home. Compared to now, this makes us feel like the world is getting better. Surely, the artificial light illuminating the shadows has played a role in this change.
Adequate street-lighting is really a product of the twentieth century, but throughout the nineteenth century progress was steadily made from the beginning of gas-lighting in 1807. In preceding centuries crude lighting was employed here and there but not generally by the public authorities. In the earliest centuries of written history little is said of street-lighting. In those days man was not so much inclined to improve upon nature, beyond protecting himself from the elements, and he lighted the streets more as a festive outburst than as an economic proposition. Nevertheless, in the early writings occasionally there are indications that in the centers of advanced civilization some efforts were made to light the streets.
Adequate street lighting really became a reality in the twentieth century, but throughout the nineteenth century, progress was steadily made starting with gas lighting in 1807. In earlier centuries, basic lighting was used here and there, but it wasn't generally provided by public authorities. In the earliest periods of written history, there isn't much mention of street lighting. Back then, people weren't as focused on improving upon nature, beyond protecting themselves from the elements, and they lit the streets more for celebrations than as a practical need. Still, in early writings, there are occasional indications that in the centers of advanced civilization, some efforts were made to light the streets.
The old Syrian city of Antioch, which in the fourth century of the Christian era contained about four hundred thousand inhabitants, appears to have had lighted streets. Libanius, who lived in the early years of that century, wrote:
The ancient Syrian city of Antioch, which in the fourth century of the Christian era had around four hundred thousand residents, seems to have had illuminated streets. Libanius, who lived in the early part of that century, wrote:
The light of the sun is succeeded by other lights, which are far superior to the lamps lighted by Egyptians on the festival of Minerva of Sais. The night with us differs from the day only in the appearance of the light; with regard to labor and employment, everything goes on well.
The sunlight is followed by other lights that are much better than the lamps lit by the Egyptians during the festival of Minerva of Sais. Our night differs from our day only in the appearance of light; when it comes to work and tasks, everything goes smoothly.
cut with their swords the ropes from which were suspended the lamps that afforded light in the night-time, to show that the ornaments of the city ought to give way to them.
They cut the ropes with their swords that were holding up the lamps providing light at night, to show that the city's decorations should make way for them.
Another writer in describing a dispute between two religious adherents of opposed creeds stated that they quarreled "till the streets were lighted" and the crowd of onlookers broke up, but not until they "spat in each other's face and retired." Thus it is seen that artificial light and civilization may advance, even though some human traits remain fundamentally unchanged.
Another writer, explaining a disagreement between two people of opposing faiths, said they fought "until the streets were lit" and the crowd of spectators dispersed, but not before they "spat in each other's faces and walked away." This shows that while artificial light and civilization can progress, some human traits remain essentially the same.
Throughout the next thousand years there was little attempt to light the streets. Iron baskets of burning wood, primitive oil-lamps, and candles were used to some extent, but during all these centuries there was no attempt on the part of the government or of individuals to light the streets in an organized manner. In 1417 the Mayor of London ordained "lanthorns with lights to bee hanged out on the winter evenings betwixt Hallowtide and Candlemasse." This was during the festive season, so perhaps street-lighting was not the sole aim. Early in the sixteenth century, the streets of Paris being infested with robbers, the inhabitants were ordered to keep lights burning in the windows of all houses that fronted on the streets.
For the next thousand years, there was hardly any effort to light the streets. Iron baskets of burning wood, basic oil lamps, and candles were used to some extent, but throughout all these centuries, the government and individuals made no organized attempt to illuminate the streets. In 1417, the Mayor of London established a rule that "lanterns with lights should be hung out on winter evenings between Hallowtide and Candlemas." This was during the festive season, so street lighting may not have been the only purpose. In the early sixteenth century, as the streets of Paris were plagued by robbers, residents were required to keep lights burning in the windows of all houses facing the streets.
For about three centuries the citizens of London, and doubtless of Paris and of other cities, were reminded from time to time in official mandates "on pains and penalties to hang out their lanthorns at the appointed time." The watchman in long coat with halberd and lantern in hand supplemented these mandates as he made his rounds by,
For around three hundred years, the people of London, and likely those in Paris and other cities, were periodically reminded in official orders "on pains and penalties to hang out their lanterns at the scheduled time." The watchman, dressed in a long coat with a halberd and a lantern in hand, supplemented these orders as he patrolled,
A light here, maids, hang out your lights,
A light here, ladies, hang out your lights,
And see your horns be clear and bright,
And make sure your horns are clear and bright,
That so your candle clear may shine,
That your candle can shine clearly,
Continuing from six till nine;
Continuing from 6 to 9;
That honest men that walk along
That honest men who walk along
May see to pass safe without wrong.
May see to pass safely without harm.
In 1668, when some regulations were made for improving the streets of London, the inhabitants were ordered "for the safety and peace of the city to hang out candles duly to the accustomed hour." Apparently this method of obtaining lighting for the streets was not met by the enthusiastic support of the people, for during the next few decades the Lord Mayor was busy issuing threats and commands. In 1679 he proclaimed the "neglect of the inhabitants of this city in hanging and keeping out their lights at the accustomed hours, according to the good and ancient usage of this City and Acts of the Common Council on that behalf." The result of this neglect was "when nights darkened the streets then wandered forth the sons of Belial, flown with insolence and wine."
In 1668, when new regulations were introduced to improve the streets of London, residents were instructed "for the safety and peace of the city to hang out candles at the usual hour." This method of providing street lighting didn't receive much enthusiasm from the people, as over the next few decades, the Lord Mayor was busy issuing threats and commands. In 1679, he announced the "neglect of the inhabitants of this city in hanging and keeping out their lights at the usual hours, according to the good and ancient practice of this City and Acts of the Common Council on that matter." The result of this neglect was that "when nights grew dark, the streets were then roamed by the sons of Belial, fueled by arrogance and wine."
In 1694 Hemig patented a reflector which partially surrounded the open flame of a whale-oil lamp and possessed a hole in the top which aided ventilation. He obtained the exclusive rights of lighting London for a period of years and undertook to place a light before every tenth door, between the hours of six and twelve o'clock, from Michaelmas to Lady Day. His effort was a worthy one, but he was opposed by a certain faction, which was successful in obtaining a withdrawal of his license in 1716. Again the burden of lighting the streets was thrust upon the residents and fines were imposed for negligence in this respect. But this procedure after a few more years of desultory lighting was again found to be unsatisfactory.
In 1694, Hemig patented a reflector that partially surrounded the open flame of a whale-oil lamp and had a hole on top for ventilation. He secured exclusive rights to light London for several years and committed to placing a light in front of every tenth door between six and twelve o'clock, from Michaelmas to Lady Day. His initiative was commendable, but he faced opposition from a certain group that successfully had his license revoked in 1716. Once again, the responsibility for lighting the streets fell back on the residents, and fines were imposed for negligence. However, after a few more years of inconsistent lighting, this approach was found to be inadequate once again.
In 1729 certain individuals contracted to light the streets of London by taxing the residents and paid the city for this monopoly. Householders were permitted to hang out a lantern or a candle or to pay the company for doing so. But robberies increased so rapidly that in 1736 the Lord Mayor and Common Council petitioned Parliament to erect lamps for lighting the city. An act was passed accordingly, giving them the privilege to erect lamps where they saw fit and to burn them from sunset to sunrise. A charge was made to the residents, on a sliding scale depending upon the rate of rental of the houses. As a consequence five thousand lamps were soon installed. In 1738 there were fifteen thousand street lamps in London and they were burned an average of five thousand hours annually.
In 1729, certain individuals contracted to light the streets of London by taxing the residents and paid the city for this monopoly. Householders were allowed to hang out a lantern or a candle or pay the company for doing it. However, robberies increased so quickly that in 1736 the Lord Mayor and Common Council asked Parliament to install lamps for lighting the city. An act was passed that allowed them to set up lamps wherever they saw fit and to light them from sunset to sunrise. Residents were charged based on a sliding scale depending on their house rental rates. As a result, five thousand lamps were soon installed. By 1738, there were fifteen thousand street lamps in London, and they were lit for an average of five thousand hours each year.
In the annals of these early times street-lighting is almost invariably the result of an attempt to reduce the number of robberies and other crimes. In appealing for more street-lamps in 1744 the Lord Mayor and aldermen of London in a petition to the king, stated
In the records of these early times, street lighting was almost always an effort to decrease the number of robberies and other crimes. In a plea for more street lamps in 1744, the Lord Mayor and aldermen of London stated in a petition to the king,
that divers confederacies of great numbers of evil-disposed persons, armed with bludgeons, pistols, cutlasses, and other dangerous weapons, infest not only the private lanes and passages, but likewise the public streets and places of public concourse, and commit most daring outrages upon the persons of your Majesty's good subjects, whose affairs oblige them to pass through the streets, by terrifying, robbing and wounding them; and these facts are frequently perpetrated at such times as were heretofore deemed hours of security.
Various groups of large numbers of malicious individuals, armed with clubs, guns, swords, and other dangerous weapons, are causing issues not only in the private alleys and paths, but also in the public streets and areas where crowds gather. They are committing bold attacks on your Majesty's loyal subjects, who are simply trying to go about their day, by scaring, robbing, and hurting them. These acts often occur at times that used to be considered safe.
It has already been seen that gas-lighting was introduced in the streets of London for the first time in 1807. This marks the real beginning of public-service lighting companies. In the next decade interest in street-lighting by means of gas was awakened on the Continent, and it was not long before this new phase of civilization was well under way. Although this first gas-lighting was done by the use of open flames, it was a great improvement over all the preceding efforts. Lawlessness did not disappear entirely, of course, and perhaps it never will, but it skulked in the back streets. A controlling influence had now appeared.
It’s already been noted that gas lighting was introduced to the streets of London for the first time in 1807. This marked the true beginning of public lighting service companies. In the following decade, interest in gas street lighting developed in Europe, and it didn’t take long for this new aspect of civilization to take off. Although this initial gas lighting used open flames, it was a significant improvement over previous efforts. Lawlessness didn’t completely vanish, of course, and maybe it never will, but it moved to the back streets. A controlling influence had now emerged.
But early innovations in lighting did not escape criticism and opposition. In fact, innovations to-day are not always received by unanimous consent. There were many in those early days who felt that what was good for them should be good enough for the younger generation. The descendants of these opponents are present to-day but fortunately in diminishing numbers. It has been shown that in Philadelphia in 1833 a proposal to install a gas-plant was met with a protest signed by many prominent citizens. A few paragraphs of an article entitled "Arguments against Light" which appeared in the Cologne Zeitung in 1816 indicate the character of the objections raised against street-lighting.
But early innovations in lighting faced criticism and resistance. In fact, innovations today are not always accepted unanimously. Many people back then believed that what was sufficient for them should be good enough for the younger generation. The descendants of these opponents are still around today, but thankfully in fewer numbers. Evidence shows that in Philadelphia in 1833, a proposal to set up a gas plant faced protests signed by numerous prominent citizens. A few paragraphs from an article titled "Arguments against Light," which appeared in the Cologne Zeitung in 1816 highlight the nature of the objections raised against street lighting.
- From the theological standpoint: Artificial illumination is an attempt to interfere with the divine plan of the world, which has preordained darkness during the night-time.
- From the judicial standpoint: Those people who do not want light ought not to be compelled to pay for its use.
- From the medical standpoint: The emanations of illuminating gas are injurious. Moreover, illuminated streets would induce people to remain later out of doors, leading to an increase in ailments caused by colds.
- From the moral standpoint: The fear of darkness will vanish and drunkenness and depravity increase.
- From the viewpoint of the police: The horses will get frightened and the thieves emboldened.
- From the point of view of national economy: Great sums of money will be exported to foreign countries.
- From the point of view of the common people: The constant illumination of streets by night will rob festive illuminations of their charm.
The foregoing objections require no comment, for they speak volumes pertaining to the thoughts and activities of men a century ago. It is difficult to believe that civilization has traveled so far in a single century, but from this early beginning of street-lighting social progress received a great impetus. Artificial light-sources were feeble at that time, but they made the streets safer and by means of them social intercourse was extended. The people increased their hours of activity and commerce, industry, and knowledge grew apace.
The objections mentioned don’t need any explanation, as they clearly reflect the mindset and actions of people a hundred years ago. It’s hard to believe that civilization has advanced so much in just a century, but the introduction of street lighting really boosted social progress. Back then, artificial light sources were weak, but they made the streets safer and allowed for more social interaction. People increased their hours of activity, leading to rapid growth in commerce, industry, and knowledge.
The open gas-jet and kerosene-flame lamps held forth on the streets until within the memory of middle-aged persons of to-day. The lamplighter with his ladder is still fresh in memory. Many of the towns and villages have never been lighted by gas, for they stepped from the oil-lamp to the electric lamp. The gas-mantle has made it possible for gas-lighting to continue as a competitor of electric-lighting for the streets.
The open gas jets and kerosene lamps lit up the streets until the middle-aged people of today can remember. The lamplighter with his ladder is still a vivid memory. Many towns and villages never had gas lighting; they went straight from oil lamps to electric lamps. The gas mantle has allowed gas lighting to keep competing with electric lighting in the streets.
In 1877 Mr. Brush illuminated the Public Square of Cleveland with a number of arc-lamps, and these met with such success that within a short time two hundred and fifty thousand open-arc lamps were installed in this country, involving an investment of millions of dollars. Adding to this investment a much greater one in central-station equipment, a very large investment is seen to have resulted from this single development in lighting.
In 1877, Mr. Brush lit up the Public Square in Cleveland with several arc lamps, and they were so successful that shortly after, two hundred and fifty thousand open-arc lamps were installed across the country, costing millions of dollars. When you add in a much larger investment in central-station equipment, it’s clear that this one advancement in lighting led to a substantial investment.
This open-arc lamp was the first powerful light-source available and, appearing several years before the gas-mantle, it threatened to monopolize street-lighting. It consumed about 500 watts and had a maximum luminous intensity of about 1200 candles at an angle of about 45 degrees. Its chief disadvantage was its distribution of light, mainly at this angle of 45 degrees, which resulted in a spot of light near the lamp and little light at a distance. A satisfactory street-lighting unit must emit its light chiefly just below the horizontal in those cases where the lamps must be spaced far apart for economical reasons. On referring to the chapter on the electric arc it will be seen that the upper (positive) carbon of the open-arc emits most of the light. Thus most of the light tends to be sent downward, but the lower carbon obstructs some of this with a resulting dark spot beneath the lamp.
This open-arc lamp was the first strong light source available and, coming out several years before the gas mantle, it threatened to dominate street lighting. It used about 500 watts and had a maximum brightness of around 1200 candles at a 45-degree angle. Its main downside was its light distribution, primarily at this 45-degree angle, which created a bright spot near the lamp but left little light farther away. A good street lighting unit needs to shine its light mainly just below the horizontal, especially when the lamps have to be spaced far apart to save costs. If you check the chapter on the electric arc, it will be seen that the upper (positive) carbon of the open-arc gives off most of the light. So, most of the light goes downward, but the lower carbon blocks some of it, creating a dark spot underneath the lamp.
The gas-mantle followed closely after the arrival of the carbon arc and is responsible for the existence of gas-lighting on the streets at the present time. It is a large source of light and therefore its light cannot be controlled by modern accessories as well as the light from smaller sources, such as the arc or concentrated-filament lamp. As a consequence, there is marked unevenness of illumination along the streets unless the gas-mantle units are spaced rather closely. Even with the open-arc, without special light-controlling equipment there is about a thousand times the intensity near the lamps when placed on the corners of the block as there is midway between them.
The gas mantle came shortly after the carbon arc and is what enables gas lighting on the streets today. It produces a lot of light, which means it can't be controlled as easily as light from smaller sources, like the arc or concentrated filament lamps. As a result, there's a noticeable unevenness in illumination along the streets unless the gas mantle units are placed relatively close together. Even with the open arc, without special light-controlling equipment, the light intensity can be about a thousand times stronger near the lamps at the corners of the block compared to the areas in between them.
In 1879 the incandescent filament lamp was introduced and it began to appear on the streets in a short time. It was a feeble, inefficient light-source, compared with the arc-lamp, but it had the advantage of being installed on a small bracket. As a consequence of simplicity of operation, the incandescent lamp was installed to a considerable extent, especially in the suburban districts.
In 1879, the incandescent filament lamp was introduced, and it quickly started appearing on the streets. It was a weak, inefficient light source compared to the arc lamp, but it could be easily mounted on a small bracket. Because it was simple to operate, the incandescent lamp was widely installed, especially in suburban areas.

THE MOORE NITROGEN TUBE
In lobby of Madison Square Garden
THE MOORE NITROGEN TUBE
In the lobby of Madison Square Garden
The open-arc lamp possessed the disadvantage of emitting a very unsteady light and of consuming the carbons so rapidly that daily trimming was often necessary. In 1893 the enclosed arc appeared and although it consumed as much electrical energy as the open-arc and emitted considerably less light, it possessed the great advantage of operating a week without requiring a renewal of carbons. By surrounding the arc by means of a glass globe, little oxygen could come in contact with the carbons and they were not consumed very rapidly. The light was fairly steady and these arcs operated satisfactorily on alternating current. The latter feature simplified the generating and distributing equipment of the central station.
The open-arc lamp had the downside of producing very inconsistent light and using up the carbon rods so quickly that daily maintenance was often needed. In 1893, the enclosed arc was introduced, and while it used the same amount of electrical energy as the open-arc and produced significantly less light, it had the major benefit of running for a week without needing to replace the carbon rods. By surrounding the arc with a glass globe, less oxygen could reach the carbon rods, which meant they lasted longer. The light was relatively steady, and these arcs worked well with alternating current. This last point made the equipment for generating and distributing electricity at the central station simpler.
The magnetite or luminous arc-lamp next appeared and met with considerable success. It was more efficient than the preceding lamps but was handicapped by being solely a direct-current device. Those familiar with the generation and distribution of electricity will realize this disadvantage. However, its luminous intensity just below the horizontal was about 700 candles and its general distribution of light was fairly satisfactory. Later the flame-arcs began to appear and they were installed to some extent. The arc-lamp has served well in street-lighting from the year 1877, when the open-arc was introduced, until the present time, when the luminous-arc is the chief survivor of all the arc-lamps.
The magnetite or luminous arc lamp soon appeared and found considerable success. It was more efficient than the previous lamps but was limited because it only worked with direct current. Those familiar with electricity generation and distribution will understand this drawback. However, its brightness just below the horizontal was about 700 candles, and its overall light distribution was fairly good. Later, flame arcs started to appear and were used to some extent. The arc lamp has worked well for street lighting since 1877, when the open arc was introduced, and continues to be the main type of arc lamp in use today.

MODERN STREET LIGHTING
Tunnels of light boring through the darkness provide safe channels for
modern traffic
MODERN STREET LIGHTING
Beams of light cutting through the darkness create safe paths for today’s traffic.
The carbon incandescent filament lamp was used extensively until 1909, when the tungsten filament lamp began to replace it very rapidly. However, it was not until 1914, when the gas-filled tungsten lamp appeared, that this type of light-source could compete with arc-lamps on the basis of efficiency. The helical construction of the filament made it possible to confine the filament of a high-intensity tungsten lamp in a small space and for the first time a high degree of control of the light of street lamps was possible. Prismatic "refractors" were designed, somewhat on the principle of the lighthouse refractor, so that the light would be emitted largely just below the horizontal. This type of distribution builds up the illumination at distant points between successive street lamps, which is very desirable in street-lighting. The incandescent filament lamp possesses many advantages over other systems. It is efficient; capable of subdivision; operates on direct and alternating current; requires little attention; and is capable of most successful use with light-controlling apparatus.
The carbon incandescent filament lamp was widely used until 1909, when the tungsten filament lamp started to quickly take its place. However, it wasn't until 1914, when the gas-filled tungsten lamp was introduced, that this type of light source could compete with arc lamps in terms of efficiency. The helical design of the filament allowed for the high-intensity tungsten lamp to be compacted into a small space, enabling a high level of control over the light for street lamps for the first time. Prismatic "refractors" were created, somewhat based on the principle of the lighthouse refractor, so that the light would primarily be emitted just below the horizontal. This type of light distribution enhances illumination at distant points between street lamps, which is highly desirable for street lighting. The incandescent filament lamp offers many benefits over other systems. It's efficient, can be subdivided, works with both direct and alternating current, requires minimal maintenance, and is effectively used with light-controlling devices.
According to the reports of the Department of Commerce the number of electric arc-lamps for street-lighting supplied by public electric-light plants decreased from 348,643 in 1912 to 256,838 in 1917, while the number of electric incandescent filament lamps increased from 681,957 in 1912 to 1,389,382 in 1917.
According to reports from the Department of Commerce, the number of electric arc lamps used for street lighting supplied by public electric light plants dropped from 348,643 in 1912 to 256,838 in 1917, while the number of electric incandescent filament lamps rose from 681,957 in 1912 to 1,389,382 in 1917.
Street-lighting is not only a reinforcement for the police but it decreases accidents and has come to be looked upon as an advertising medium. In the downtown districts the high-intensity "white-way" lighting is festive. The ornamental street lamps have possibilities in making the streets attractive and in illuminating the buildings. However, it is to be hoped that in the present age the streets of cities and towns will be cleared of the ragged equipment of the telephone and lighting companies. These may be placed in the alleys or underground, leaving the streets beautiful by day and glorified at night by the torches of advanced civilization.
Street lighting not only supports the police, but it also reduces accidents and has become seen as an advertising tool. In downtown areas, the bright "white-way" lighting creates a festive atmosphere. The decorative street lamps have the potential to make the streets more appealing and to light up the buildings. However, we hope that nowadays, the streets of cities and towns will be free of the unsightly equipment from telephone and lighting companies. These can be placed in alleys or underground, leaving the streets beautiful during the day and illuminated at night by the lights of modern civilization.
XIII
LIGHTHOUSES
At the present time thousands of lighthouses, light-ships, and light-buoys guide the navigator along the waterways and into harbors and warn him of dangerous shoals. Many wonderful feats of engineering are involved in their construction and in no field of artificial lighting has more ingenuity been displayed in devising powerful beams of light. Many of these beacons of safety are automatic in operation and require little attention. It has been said that nothing indicates the liberality, prosperity, or intelligence of a nation more clearly than the facilities which it affords for the safe approach of the mariner to its shores. Surely these marine lights are important factors in modern navigation.
At present, thousands of lighthouses, lightships, and light buoys help guide navigators along waterways and into harbors, warning them of dangerous shallow areas. Their construction involves many impressive engineering feats, and there’s no area of artificial lighting where more creativity has been shown in creating powerful beams of light. Many of these safety beacons operate automatically and need very little maintenance. It's been said that nothing reflects a nation’s generosity, prosperity, or intelligence more clearly than the efforts it makes to ensure safe access for sailors to its shores. Clearly, these marine lights are essential in modern navigation.
The first "lighthouses" were beacon-fires of burning wood maintained by priests for the benefit of the early commerce in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. As early as the seventh century before Christ these beacon-fires were mentioned in writings. In the third century before the Christian era a tower said to be of a great height was built on a small island near Alexandria during the reign of Ptolemy II. The tower was named Pharos, which is the origin of the term "pharology" applied to the science of lighthouse construction. Cæsar, who visited Alexandria two centuries later, described the Pharos as a "tower of great height, of wonderful construction." Fire was kept burning in it night and day and Pliny said of it, "During the night it appears as bright as a star, and during the day it is distinguished by the smoke." Apparently this tower served as a lighthouse for more than a thousand years. It was found in ruins in 1349. Throughout succeeding centuries many towers were built, but little attention was given to the development of light-sources and optical apparatus.
The first "lighthouses" were beacon fires made of burning wood, maintained by priests to support early trade in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. These beacon fires were mentioned in writings as early as the seventh century BC. In the third century BC, during Ptolemy II's reign, a tall tower was built on a small island near Alexandria. The tower was named Pharos, which is where the term "pharology," referring to the study of lighthouse construction, comes from. Two centuries later, Julius Caesar described the Pharos as a "tower of great height, of wonderful construction." Fire was kept burning in it day and night, and Pliny remarked, "At night it appears as bright as a star, and during the day, it's visible by the smoke." This tower functioned as a lighthouse for over a thousand years until it was found in ruins in 1349. Many more towers were built in the following centuries, but there was little focus on improving light sources and optical technology.
The first lighthouse in the United States and perhaps on the Western continents was the Boston Light, which was completed in 1716. A few days after it was put into operation a news item in a Boston paper heralded the noteworthy event as follows:
The first lighthouse in the United States, and possibly on the Western continents, was the Boston Light, completed in 1716. A few days after it began operating, a news article in a Boston paper celebrated the significant event as follows:
By virtue of an Act of Assembly made in the First Year of His Majesty's Reign, For Building and Maintaining a Light House upon the Great Brewster (called Beacon-Island) at the Entrance of the Harbour of Boston, in order to prevent the loss of the Lives and Estates of His Majesty's Subjects; the said Light House has been built; and on Fryday last the 14th Currant the Light was kindled, which will be very useful for all Vessels going out and coming in to the Harbour of Boston, or any other Harbours in the Massachusetts Bay, for which all Masters shall pay to the Receiver of Impost, one Penny per Ton Inwards, and another Penny Outwards, except Coasters, who are to pay Two Shillings each, at their clearance Out, And all Fishing Vessels, Wood Sloops, etc. Five Shillings each by the Year.
According to an Act of Assembly passed in the first year of His Majesty's reign, a lighthouse has been built and maintained on Great Brewster (also known as Beacon Island) at the entrance of Boston Harbor to prevent the loss of life and property for His Majesty's subjects. The light was turned on last Friday, the 14th of this month, and will greatly assist all vessels entering and leaving Boston Harbor or any other harbors in Massachusetts Bay. All vessel masters will pay the Receiver of Impost one penny per ton for incoming trips and another penny for outgoing trips, except for coasters, who will pay two shillings each when they clear out. All fishing vessels, wood sloops, etc., will pay five shillings each per year.
This was the practical result of a petition of Boston merchants made three years before. The tower was built of stone, at a cost of about ten thousand dollars. Two years later the keeper and his family were drowned and the catastrophe so affected Benjamin Franklin, a boy of thirteen, that he wrote a poem concerning it. The lighthouse was badly damaged during the Revolution, by raiding-parties, and in 1776, when the British fleet left the harbor, a squad of sailors blew it up. It was rebuilt in 1783 and has since been increased in height.
This was the practical outcome of a petition from Boston merchants made three years earlier. The tower was built of stone, costing about ten thousand dollars. Two years later, the keeper and his family drowned, and the tragedy affected Benjamin Franklin, a thirteen-year-old boy, so deeply that he wrote a poem about it. The lighthouse was badly damaged during the Revolution by raiding parties, and in 1776, when the British fleet left the harbor, a group of sailors blew it up. It was rebuilt in 1783 and has since been made taller.
Apparently oil-lamps were used in it from the beginning, notwithstanding the fact that candles and coal fires served for years in many lighthouses of Europe. In 1789 sixteen lamps were used and in 1811 Argand lamps and reflectors were installed, with a revolving mechanism. It now ceased to be a fixed light and the day of flashing lights had arrived. At the present time the Boston Light emits a beam of 100,000 candle-power directed by modern lenses.
Apparently, oil lamps were used from the start, even though candles and coal fires were used for years in many lighthouses in Europe. In 1789, sixteen lamps were in use, and by 1811, Argand lamps and reflectors were installed along with a revolving mechanism. It then stopped being a fixed light, marking the arrival of flashing lights. Today, the Boston Light emits a beam of 100,000 candle-power directed by modern lenses.
When the United States Government was organized in 1789 there were ten lighthouses owned by the Colonies, but the Boston Light was in operation thirty years before the others. Sandy Hook Light, New York Harbor, was established in 1764 and its original masonry tower is still standing and in use. It is the oldest surviving lighthouse in this country. It was built with funds raised by means of two lotteries authorized by the New York Assembly. A few days after it was lighted for the first time the following news item appeared in a New York paper:
When the United States Government was set up in 1789, there were ten lighthouses owned by the Colonies, but the Boston Light had been operating thirty years before the others. Sandy Hook Light in New York Harbor was built in 1764, and its original masonry tower is still standing and in use. It’s the oldest surviving lighthouse in the country. It was constructed with money raised through two lotteries approved by the New York Assembly. A few days after it was lit for the first time, the following news item appeared in a New York newspaper:
On Monday evening last the New York Light-house erected at Sandy Hook was lighted for the first time. The House is of an Octagon Figure, having eight equal Sides; the Diameter at the Base 29 Feet; and at the top of the Wall, 15 Feet. The Lanthorn is 7 feet high; the Circumference 33 feet. The whole Construction of the Lanthorn is Iron; the Top covered with Copper. There are 48 Oil Blazes. The Building from the Surface is Nine Stories; the whole from Bottom to Top is 103 Feet.
On Monday evening, the New York lighthouse at Sandy Hook was lit for the first time. The structure is octagonal, with eight equal sides; the diameter at the base is 29 feet, and at the top of the wall, it's 15 feet. The lantern is 7 feet tall, with a circumference of 33 feet. The entire lantern is made of iron, and the top is covered with copper. There are 48 oil flames. The building has nine stories above the ground and measures a total of 103 feet from bottom to top.
From these early years the number of lighthouses has steadily grown, until now the United States maintains lights along 50,000 miles of coast-line and river channels, a distance equal to twice the circumference of the earth. It maintains at the present time about 15,000 aids to navigation at an annual cost of about $5,000,000. In 1916 this country was operating 1706 major lights, 53 light-ships, and 512 light-buoys—a total of 5323.
From these early years, the number of lighthouses has steadily increased, and now the United States operates lights along 50,000 miles of coastlines and river channels, which is twice the circumference of the Earth. Currently, it maintains about 15,000 navigational aids at an annual cost of around $5,000,000. In 1916, this country was operating 1,706 major lights, 53 lightships, and 512 light buoys—a total of 5,323.
The earliest lighthouses were equipped with braziers or grates in which coal or wood was burned. These crude light-sources were used until after the advent of the nineteenth century and in one case until 1846. In the famous Eddystone tower off Plymouth, England, candles were used for the first time. The first Eddystone tower was completed in 1698, but it was swept away in 1703. Another was built and destroyed by fire in 1755. Smeaton then built another in 1759. Inasmuch as Smeaton is credited with having introduced the use of candles, this must have occurred in the eighteenth century; still it appears that, as we have said, the Boston Light, built in 1716, used oil-lamps from its beginning. However, Smeaton installed twenty-four candles of rather large size each credited with an intensity of 2.8 candles. The total luminous intensity of the light-source in this tower was about 67 candles. Inasmuch as this was before the use of efficient reflectors and lenses, it is obvious that the early lighthouses were rather feeble beacons.
The earliest lighthouses were fitted with braziers or grates where coal or wood was burned. These basic light sources were in use until after the nineteenth century, and in one case, until 1846. The famous Eddystone tower off Plymouth, England, used candles for the first time. The first Eddystone tower was completed in 1698 but was swept away in 1703. A second one was built and then destroyed by fire in 1755. Smeaton then constructed another in 1759. Since Smeaton is credited with introducing the use of candles, this must have happened in the eighteenth century; however, as we mentioned, the Boston Light, built in 1716, used oil lamps from the start. Smeaton installed twenty-four large candles, each with an intensity of 2.8 candles. The total luminous intensity of the light source in this tower was about 67 candles. Since this was before the use of efficient reflectors and lenses, it's clear that early lighthouses were quite weak beacons.
According to British records, oil-lamps with flat wicks were first used in the Liverpool lighthouses in 1763. The Argand lamp, introduced in about 1784, became widely used. The better combustion obtained with this lamp having a cylindrical wick and a glass chimney greatly increased the luminous intensity and general satisfactoriness of the oil-lamp. Later Lange added an improvement by providing a contraction toward the upper part of the chimney. Rumford and also Fresnel devised multiple-wick burners, thus increasing the luminous intensity. In these early lamps sperm-oil and colza-oil were burned and they continued to be until the middle of the nineteenth century. Cocoanut-oil, lard-oil, and olive-oil have also been used in lighthouses.
According to British records, oil lamps with flat wicks were first used in the Liverpool lighthouses in 1763. The Argand lamp, which was introduced around 1784, became very popular. The improved combustion from this lamp, featuring a cylindrical wick and a glass chimney, significantly increased the brightness and overall effectiveness of the oil lamp. Later, Lange made an improvement by adding a narrowing at the top of the chimney. Rumford and Fresnel also created multiple-wick burners, further boosting the brightness. In these early lamps, sperm oil and colza oil were used, and they remained in use until the mid-nineteenth century. Coconut oil, lard oil, and olive oil have also been utilized in lighthouses.
Naturally, mineral oil was introduced as soon as it was available, owing to its lower cost; but it was not until nearly 1870 that a satisfactory mineral-oil lamp was in operation in lighthouses. Doty is credited with the invention of the first successful multiple-wick lighthouse lamp using mineral oil, and his lamp and modifications of it were very generally used until the latter part of the nineteenth century. These lamps are of two types—one in which oil is supplied to the burner under pressure and the other in which oil is maintained at a constant level. In some of the smallest lamps the ordinary capillarity of the wick is depended on to supply oil to the flame.
Naturally, mineral oil was introduced as soon as it became available because it was cheaper; however, it wasn't until around 1870 that a reliable mineral-oil lamp was used in lighthouses. Doty is credited with inventing the first successful multiple-wick lighthouse lamp that used mineral oil, and his lamp and its variations were widely used until the late nineteenth century. There are two types of these lamps—one that supplies oil to the burner under pressure and another that keeps the oil at a constant level. In some of the smallest lamps, the usual capillarity of the wick is relied upon to supply oil to the flame.
Coal-gas was introduced into lighthouses in about the middle of the nineteenth century. Inasmuch as the gas-mantle had not yet appeared, the gas was burned in jets. Various arrangements of the jets, such as concentric rings forming a stepped cone, were devised. The gas-mantle was a great boon to the mariner as well as to civilized beings in general. It greatly increases the intensity of light obtainable from a given amount of fuel and it is a fairly compact bright source which makes it possible to direct the light to some degree by means of optical systems. Owing to the elaborate apparatus necessary for making coal-gas, several other gases have been more desirable fuels for lighthouse lamps. Various simple gas-generators have been devised. Some of the high-flash mineral-oils are vaporized and burned under a mantle. Acetylene, which is so simply made by means of calcium carbide and water, has been a great factor in lighting for navigation. By the latter part of the nineteenth century lighthouses employing incandescent gas-burners were emitting beams of light having luminous intensities as great as several hundred thousand candles. These special gas-mantle light-sources have brightness as high as several hundred candles per square inch.
Coal gas was introduced into lighthouses around the middle of the nineteenth century. Since the gas mantle hadn’t been invented yet, the gas was burned in jets. Different arrangements of the jets, like concentric rings forming a stepped cone, were created. The gas mantle was a huge advantage for sailors as well as for people in general. It significantly increases the brightness of light produced from a given amount of fuel and provides a fairly compact, bright source that allows for some direction of the light using optical systems. Due to the complicated equipment needed to produce coal gas, several other gases have become preferred fuels for lighthouse lamps. Various simple gas generators have been developed. Some high-flash mineral oils are vaporized and burned under a mantle. Acetylene, which can be easily made using calcium carbide and water, has played a significant role in navigation lighting. By the late nineteenth century, lighthouses using incandescent gas burners were producing beams of light with intensities as high as several hundred thousand candles. These special gas mantle light sources can be as bright as several hundred candles per square inch.
Electric arc-lamps were first introduced into lighthouse service in about 1860, but these lamps cannot be considered to have been really practicable until about 1875. In 1883 the British lighthouse authorities carried out an extensive investigation of arc-lamps. It was found that the whiter light from these lamps suffered a greater absorption by the atmosphere than the yellower light from oils, but the much greater luminous intensity of the arc-lamp more than compensated for this disadvantage. The final result of the investigation was the conclusion that for ordinary lighthouse purposes the oil-and gas-lamps were more suitable and economical than arc-lamps; but where great range was desired, the latter were much more advantageous, owing to their great luminous intensity. Electric incandescent filament lamps have been used for the less important lights, and recently there has been some application of the modern high-efficiency filament lamps.
Electric arc lamps were first introduced in lighthouses around 1860, but they really became practical by about 1875. In 1883, British lighthouse authorities conducted a thorough investigation into arc lamps. They discovered that the whiter light from these lamps was absorbed more by the atmosphere than the yellower light from oil lamps. However, the significantly higher luminous intensity of the arc lamp more than made up for this drawback. The final conclusion from the investigation was that for regular lighthouse use, oil and gas lamps were more suitable and cost-effective than arc lamps. But when a greater range was needed, arc lamps were much more beneficial due to their high luminous intensity. Electric incandescent filament lamps have been used for less important lights, and recently, there has been some use of modern high-efficiency filament lamps.
Besides the high towers there are many minor beacons, light-ships, and light-buoys in use. Many of these are untended and therefore must operate automatically. The light-ship is used where it is impracticable or too expensive to build a lighthouse. Inasmuch as it is anchored in fairly deep water, it is safe in foggy weather to steer almost directly toward its position as indicated by the fog-signal. Light-ships are more expensive to maintain than lighthouses, but they have the advantages of smaller cost and of mobility; for sometimes it may be desired to move them. The first light-ship was established in 1732 near the mouth of the Thames, and the first in this country was anchored in Chesapeake Bay near Norfolk in 1820. The early ships had no mode of self-propulsion, but the modern ones are being provided with their own power. Oil and gas have been used as fuel for the light-sources and in 1892 the U. S. Lighthouse Board constructed a light-ship with a powerful electric light. Since that time several have been equipped with electric lights supplied by electric generators and batteries.
Besides the tall lighthouses, there are many smaller beacons, lightships, and light buoys in operation. Many of these are unattended and therefore need to function automatically. Lightships are used where it’s impractical or too costly to build a lighthouse. Because they’re anchored in fairly deep water, it’s safe in foggy weather to steer almost directly towards their location as indicated by the fog signal. Lightships are more expensive to maintain than lighthouses, but they offer the benefits of lower initial costs and mobility; sometimes they need to be moved. The first lightship was established in 1732 near the mouth of the Thames, and the first one in this country was anchored in Chesapeake Bay near Norfolk in 1820. The early ships didn’t have their own propulsion, but modern ones are being equipped with power sources. Oil and gas have been used as fuel for the lights, and in 1892, the U.S. Lighthouse Board constructed a lightship with a powerful electric light. Since then, several have been outfitted with electric lights powered by generators and batteries.
Untended lights were not developed until about 1880, when Pintsch introduced his welded buoys filled with compressed gas and thereby provided a complete lighting-plant. With improvements in lamps and controls the untended light-buoys became a success. The lights burn for several months, and even for a year continuously; and the oil-gas used appears to be very satisfactory. Recently some experiments have been made with devices which would be actuated by sunlight in such a manner that the light would be extinguished during the day excepting a small pilot-flame. By this means a longer period of burning without attention may be obtained. Electric filament lamps supplied by batteries or by cables from the shore have been used, but the oil-gas buoy still remains in favor. Acetylene has been employed as a fuel for light-buoys. Automatic generators have been devised, but the high-pressure system is more simple. In the latter case purified acetylene is held in solution under high pressure in a reservoir containing an asbestos composition saturated with acetone.
Untended lights weren't developed until around 1880, when Pintsch introduced his welded buoys filled with compressed gas, providing a complete lighting system. With advancements in lamps and controls, the untended light buoys became successful. The lights can burn for several months, or even continuously for a year, and the oil-gas used seems to be very effective. Recently, some experiments have been conducted with devices that would be powered by sunlight, allowing the light to turn off during the day except for a small pilot flame. This method can extend the burning period without needing attention. Electric filament lamps powered by batteries or cables from the shore have been used, but the oil-gas buoy is still preferred. Acetylene has been used as fuel for light buoys. Automatic generators have been created, but the high-pressure system is simpler. In this case, purified acetylene is kept in solution under high pressure in a reservoir made from an asbestos composition infused with acetone.
The light-sources of beacons have had the same history as those of other navigation lights. Many of these are automatic in operation, sometimes being controlled by clockwork. During the last twenty years the gas-mantle has been very generally applied to beacon-lights. In the latter part of the nineteenth century a mineral-oil lamp was devised with a permanent wick made by forming upon a thick wick a coating of carbon. The operation is such that this is not consumed and it prevents further burning of the wick.
The light sources of beacons have followed a similar path as other navigation lights. Many of these operate automatically, sometimes controlled by clockwork. Over the last twenty years, gas mantles have been widely used for beacon lights. In the late 1800s, a mineral-oil lamp was created with a permanent wick, which was made by coating a thick wick with carbon. This setup means the wick isn’t consumed and stops further burning.
The optical apparatus of navigation lights has undergone many improvements in the past century. The early lights were not equipped with either reflecting or refracting apparatus. In 1824 Drummond devised a scheme for reflecting light in order that a distant observer might make a reading upon the point where the apparatus was being operated by another person. He was led by his experiments to suggest the application of mirrors to lighthouses. His device was essentially a parabolic mirror similar to the reflectors now widely used in automobile head-lamps, search-lights, etc. He employed the lime-light as a source of light and was enthusiastic over the results obtained. His discussion published in 1826 indicates that little practical work had been done up to that time toward obtaining beams or belts of light by means of optical apparatus. However, lighthouse records show that as early as 1763 small silvered plane glasses were set in plaster of Paris in such a manner as to form a partially enveloping reflector. Spherical reflectors were introduced in about 1780 and parabolic reflectors about ten years later.
The optical design of navigation lights has seen many advancements over the past century. The early lights didn't have any reflecting or refracting components. In 1824, Drummond came up with a method for reflecting light so that a distant observer could read the location where the device was being operated by someone else. His experiments led him to propose using mirrors in lighthouses. His invention was basically a parabolic mirror, similar to the reflectors commonly used in car headlights, searchlights, and so on. He used lime-light as a light source and was very enthusiastic about the results he achieved. His discussion published in 1826 shows that little practical work had been done up to that point to create beams or bands of light using optical equipment. However, lighthouse records indicate that as early as 1763, small silvered plane glasses were embedded in plaster of Paris to create a partially surrounding reflector. Spherical reflectors were introduced around 1780 and parabolic reflectors about ten years later.
All the earlier lights were "fixed," but as it is desirable that the mariner be able to distinguish one light from another, the revolving mechanism evolved. By its agency characteristic flashes are obtained and from the time interval the light is recognized. The first revolving mechanism was installed in 1783. The early flashing lights were obtained by means of revolving reflectors which gathered the light and directed it in the form of a beam or pencil. The type of parabolic reflector now in use does not differ essentially from that of an automobile head-lamp, excepting that it is larger.
All the earlier lights were "fixed," but since it's important for sailors to be able to tell one light from another, a revolving mechanism was developed. This allows for unique flashes that help identify the light based on the timing of the intervals. The first revolving mechanism was installed in 1783. The early flashing lights were created using revolving reflectors that collected the light and directed it as a beam. The parabolic reflector used today is essentially the same as that of a car headlight, just larger.
Lenses appear to have been introduced in the latter part of the nineteenth century. They were at first ground from a solid piece of glass, in concentric zones, in order to reduce the thickness. They were similar in principle to some of the tail-light lenses used at present on automobiles. Later the lenses were built up by means of separate annular rings. The name of Fresnel is permanently associated with lighthouse lenses because in 1822 he developed an elaborate built-up lens of annular rings. The centers of curvature of the different rings receded from the axis as their distance from the center increased, in such a manner as to overcome a serious optical defect known as spherical aberration. Fresnel devised many improvements in which he used refracting and reflecting prisms for the outer elements.
Lenses were introduced in the late part of the nineteenth century. They were initially crafted from a single piece of glass, shaped in concentric zones to minimize thickness. They were similar in design to some of today’s tail-light lenses used on cars. Later, the lenses were constructed using separate circular rings. The name Fresnel is closely linked with lighthouse lenses because he developed a complex lens made up of annular rings in 1822. The centers of curvature of the different rings moved away from the axis as their distance from the center increased, which helped fix a major optical issue known as spherical aberration. Fresnel created many enhancements using refracting and reflecting prisms for the outer parts.
The optical apparatus of lighthouses usually aims (1) to concentrate the rays of light into a pencil of light, (2) to concentrate them into a belt of light, or (3) to concentrate the rays over a limited azimuth. In the first case a single lens or a parabolic reflector suffices, but in the second case a cylindrical lens which condenses the light vertically into a horizontal sheet of light is essential. The third case is a combination of the first two. The modern lighthouse lenses are very elaborate in construction, being built up by means of many elements into several sections. For example, the central section may consist of a spherical lens ground with annular rings. In the next section refracting prisms may be used and in the outer section reflecting glass prisms are employed. The various elements are carefully designed according to the laws of geometrical optics.
The optical systems of lighthouses typically focus on (1) concentrating light into a narrow beam, (2) spreading it into a band of light, or (3) directing the rays over a specific angle. For the first option, a single lens or a parabolic reflector is enough, but for the second, a cylindrical lens that vertically condenses the light into a horizontal band is necessary. The third option combines the first two. Modern lighthouse lenses are quite complex, built with multiple components organized into several sections. For instance, the central section might have a spherical lens shaped with ring patterns. The next section can use refracting prisms, while the outer section employs reflecting glass prisms. Each component is carefully designed according to the principles of geometrical optics.
The flashing light has such advantages over the fixed that it is generally used for important beacons. A variety of methods of obtaining intermittent light have been employed, but they are not of particular interest. Sometimes the lens or reflector is revolved and in other types an opaque screen containing slits is revolved. In the larger lighthouses the optical apparatus and its structure sometimes weigh several tons. When it is necessary to revolve apparatus of this weight, the whole mechanism is floated upon mercury contained in a cast-iron vessel of suitable size, and by an ingenious arrangement only a small portion of mercury is required.
The flashing light has more advantages over the fixed light, which is why it's usually used for important beacons. Various methods of creating intermittent light have been used, but they aren't particularly noteworthy. Sometimes the lens or reflector spins, and in other designs, an opaque screen with slits rotates. In larger lighthouses, the optical equipment and its structure can weigh several tons. When it's necessary to rotate equipment of this weight, the whole mechanism is floated on mercury contained in a cast-iron vessel of appropriate size, and thanks to a clever design, only a small amount of mercury is needed.
The characteristics of navigation lights are varied considerably in order to enable the mariner to distinguish them and thereby to learn exactly where he is. The fixed light is liable to be confused with others, so it has now become a minor light. Flashes of short duration followed by longer periods of darkness are extensively used. The mariner by timing the intervals is able to recognize the light. This method is extended to groups of short flashes followed by longer intervals of darkness. In fact, short flashes have been employed to indicate a certain number so that a mariner could recognize the light by a number rather than by means of his watch. However, a time element is generally used. A combination of fixed light upon which is superposed a flash or a group of flashes of white or of colored light has been used, but it is in disrepute as being unreliable. A type known as "occulating lights" consists of a fixed light which is momentarily eclipsed, but the duration of the eclipse is usually less than that of the light. Obviously, groups of eclipses may be used. Sometimes lights of different colors are alternated without any dark intervals. The colored ones used are generally red and green, but these are short-range lights at best. Colored sectors are sometimes used over portions of the field, in order to indicate dangers, and white light shows in the fairway. These are usually fixed lights for marking the channel.
The features of navigation lights vary widely to help sailors identify them and determine their exact location. Fixed lights can easily be mistaken for others, so they are now considered minor lights. Short flashes followed by longer periods of darkness are commonly used, allowing sailors to time the intervals and recognize the light. This technique is also applied to groups of short flashes followed by longer dark intervals. In fact, short flashes have been used to represent specific numbers, enabling sailors to identify the light by number instead of by checking their watch. However, a timing element is usually incorporated. There's a type that combines a fixed light with a flash or a group of flashes in white or colored light, although it's generally viewed as unreliable. "Occulting lights" feature a fixed light that is momentarily obscured, but the duration of the obscuring is usually less than that of the light itself. Similarly, groups of eclipses can be used. Sometimes, different colors are alternated without any dark intervals. The colors typically used are red and green, but these are only effective for short ranges at best. Colored sectors may be used in certain areas to indicate hazards, while white light marks the navigable channel. These are usually fixed lights meant to define the channel.
The distance at which a light may be seen at sea depends upon its luminous intensity, upon its color or spectral composition, upon its height and that of the observer's eyes above the sea-level, and upon the atmospheric conditions. Assuming a perfectly clear atmosphere, the visibility of a light-source apparently depends directly upon its candle-power. The atmosphere ordinarily absorbs the red, orange, and yellow rays less than the green, blue, and violet rays. This is demonstrated by the setting sun, which as it approaches closer to the horizon changes from yellow to orange and finally to red as the amount of atmosphere between it and the eye increases. For this reason a red light would have a greater range than a blue light of the same luminous intensity.
The distance at which a light can be seen at sea depends on its brightness, color or spectrum, the height of the light and the observer’s eyes above sea level, and the atmospheric conditions. Assuming a perfectly clear atmosphere, how far away a light source can be seen seems to depend directly on its candle power. The atmosphere usually absorbs red, orange, and yellow rays less than green, blue, and violet rays. This is shown by the setting sun, which changes from yellow to orange and finally to red as it gets closer to the horizon and more atmosphere comes between it and the observer’s eyes. Because of this, a red light would have a longer visibility range than a blue light with the same brightness.
Under ordinary atmospheric conditions the range of the more powerful light-sources used in lighthouses is greater than the range as limited by the curvature of the earth. For the uncolored illuminants the range in nautical miles appears to be at least equal to the square root of the candle-power. A real practical limitation which still exists is the curvature of the earth, and the distance an object may be seen by the eye at sea-level depends upon the height of the object. The relation is approximately expressed thus,—
Under normal atmospheric conditions, the range of the more powerful light sources used in lighthouses exceeds the distance limited by the curvature of the Earth. For uncolored lights, the range in nautical miles is at least equal to the square root of the candlepower. A practical limitation that still exists is the curvature of the Earth, and the distance an object can be seen by the eye at sea level depends on the height of the object. The relationship can be roughly expressed as follows,—

A. A COMPLETED LIGHTHOUSE LENS
B. TORRO POINT LIGHTHOUSE, PANAMA CANAL
A. A COMPLETED LIGHTHOUSE LENS
B. TORRO POINT LIGHTHOUSE, PANAMA CANAL
Range in nautical miles = 8/7 √Height of object in feet. For example, the top of a tower 100 feet high is visible to an eye at sea-level a distance of 8/7 √100 = 80/7 = 11.43 miles. Now if the eye is 49 feet above sea-level, a similar computation will show how far away it may be seen by the original eye at sea-level. This is 8/7 √49 = 8 miles. Hence an eye 49 feet above sea-level will be able to see the top of the 100-foot tower at a distance of 11.43 + 8 or 19.43 nautical miles. Under these conditions an imaginary line drawn from the top of the tower to the eye will be just tangent to the spherical surface of the sea at a distance of 8 miles from the eye and 11.43 miles from the tower.
Range in nautical miles = 8/7 √Object height in feet. For instance, the top of a 100-foot tall tower is visible to a person at sea level at a distance of 8/7 √100 = 80/7 = 11.43 miles. If the observer is 49 feet above sea level, a similar calculation will show how far away it can be seen by someone at sea level. This is 8/7 √49 = 8 miles. Therefore, a person 49 feet above sea level will be able to see the top of the 100-foot tower at a distance of 11.43 + 8, which is 19.43 nautical miles. Under these conditions, an imaginary line drawn from the top of the tower to the observer will just touch the spherical surface of the sea at a distance of 8 miles from the observer and 11.43 miles from the tower.
The luminous intensity of a light-source or of the beam of light is directly responsible for the range. The luminous intensity of the early beacon-fires and oil-lamps was equivalent to a few candles. The improvements in light-sources and also in reflecting and refracting optical systems have steadily increased the candle-power of the beams, until to-day the beams from gas-lamps have intensities as high as several hundred thousand candle-power. The beams sent forth by modern lighthouses equipped with electric lamps and enormous light-gathering devices are rated in millions of candle-power. In fact, Navesink Light at the entrance of New York Bay is rated as high as 60,000,000 candle-power.
The brightness of a light source or its beam directly affects its range. The brightness of early beacon fires and oil lamps was about the same as a few candles. Advances in light sources, along with improvements in optics that reflect and refract light, have significantly increased the brightness of beams, so that today, beams from gas lamps can reach intensities of several hundred thousand candle-power. The beams from modern lighthouses, which use electric lamps and large light-gathering systems, are measured in millions of candle-power. For instance, the Navesink Light at the entrance of New York Bay is rated as high as 60,000,000 candle-power.
Of course, light-production has increased enormously in efficiency in the past century, but without optical devices for gathering the light, the enormous beam intensity would not be obtained. For example, consider a small source of light possessing a luminous intensity of one candle in all directions. If all this light which is emitted in all directions is gathered and sent forth in a beam of small angle, say one thousandth of the total angle surrounding a point, the intensity of this beam would be 1000 candles. It is in this manner that the enormous beam intensities are built up.
Sure, light production has become way more efficient over the last hundred years, but without optical devices to collect the light, we wouldn't achieve such high beam intensity. For instance, take a small light source that's as bright as one candle in every direction. If all the light emitted in all directions is collected and focused into a narrow beam, say one thousandth of the total angle around a point, the intensity of that beam would be 1000 candles. This is how we create those incredibly high beam intensities.
There is an interesting point pertaining to short flashes of light. To the dark-adapted eye a brief flash is registered as of considerably higher intensity than if the light remained constant. In other words, the lookout on a vessel is adapted to darkness and a flash from a beam of light is much brighter than if the same beam were shining steadily. This is a physiological phenomenon which operates in favor of the flashing light.
There’s an interesting observation about brief flashes of light. For the eye that has adjusted to darkness, a quick flash appears much more intense than if the light stayed constant. In other words, a lookout on a ship that’s adapted to dark conditions sees a flash from a light beam as much brighter than if that same beam was shining steadily. This is a physiological occurrence that works in favor of flashing lights.

AMERICAN SEARCH-LIGHT POSITION ON WESTERN FRONT IN 1919
AMERICAN SEARCH-LIGHT POSITION ON WESTERN FRONT IN 1919
Doubtless, the reader has noted that reliability, simplicity, and low cost of operation are the primary considerations for light-sources used as aids to navigation. This accounts for the continued use of oil and gas. From an optical standpoint the electric arc-lamps and concentrated-filament lamps are usually superior to the earlier sources of light, but the complexity of a plant for generating electricity is usually a disadvantage in isolated places. The larger light-ships are now using electricity generated by apparatus installed in the vessels. There seems to be a tendency toward the use of more buoys and fewer lighthouses, but the beam-intensities of the latter are increasing.
No doubt, the reader has noticed that reliability, simplicity, and low operating costs are the main factors for light sources used in navigation aids. This explains the ongoing use of oil and gas. From an optical perspective, electric arc lamps and concentrated filament lamps are generally better than earlier light sources, but the complexity of electricity generation is often a drawback in remote areas. Larger lightships now generate electricity using equipment installed on the vessels. There seems to be a trend towards using more buoys and fewer lighthouses, but the beam intensities of the latter are on the rise.

AMERICAN STANDARD FIELD SEARCH-LIGHT AND POWER UNIT
AMERICAN STANDARD FIELD SEARCHLIGHT AND POWER UNIT
In the hundred years since the Boston Light was built the same great changes wrought by the development of artificial light in other activities of civilization have appeared in the beacons of the mariner. The development of these aids to navigation has been wonderful, but it must go on and on. The surface of the earth comprises 51,886,000 square statute miles of land and 145,054,000 square miles of water. Three fourths of the earth's surface is water and the oceans will always be highways of world commerce. All the dangers cannot be overcome, but human ingenuity is capable of great achievements. Wreckage will appear along the shore-lines despite the lights, but the harvest of the shoals has been much reduced since the time described by Robert Louis Stevenson, when the coast people in the Orkneys looked upon wrecks as a source of gain. He states:
In the hundred years since the Boston Light was built, the major changes brought by the development of artificial light in other areas of civilization have also influenced maritime beacons. The advancements in navigational aids have been remarkable, but they need to continue. The Earth's surface consists of 51,886,000 square miles of land and 145,054,000 square miles of water. Three-quarters of the Earth's surface is water, and the oceans will always serve as highways for global trade. Not all dangers can be eliminated, but human innovation can achieve incredible things. There will still be wreckage along the shorelines despite the lights, but the loss of ships has significantly decreased since Robert Louis Stevenson described a time when coastal communities in the Orkneys viewed wrecks as a source of profit. He states:
It had become proverbial with some of the inhabitants to observe that "if wrecks were to happen, they might as well be sent to the poor island of Sanday as anywhere else." On this and the neighboring island, the inhabitants have certainly had their share of wrecked goods. On complaining to one of the pilots of the badness of his boat's sails, he replied with some degree of pleasantry, "Had it been His [God's] will that you come na here wi these lights, we might a' had better sails to our boats and more o' other things."
Locals often joked, "If there are going to be shipwrecks, they might as well happen to the poor island of Sanday as anywhere else." The residents of this island and the nearby one have certainly seen their share of salvaged items. When one of the pilots was asked about the terrible condition of his boat’s sails, he replied humorously, "If it had been His [God's] will for you to come here with these lights, we might have had better sails for our boats and more of other things."
In the leasing of farms, a location with a greater probability of shipwreck on the shore brought a much higher rent.
In farm leasing, a location with a higher likelihood of shipwrecks along the shore commanded a significantly higher rent.
XIV
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT IN WARFARE
When the recent war broke out science responded to the call and under the stress of feverish necessity compressed the normal development of a half-century into a few years. The airplane, in 1914 a doubtful plaything of daredevils, emerged from the war a perfected thing of the air. Lighting did not have the glamor of flying or the novelty of chemical warfare, but it progressed greatly in certain directions and served well. While artificial lighting conducted its unheralded offensive by increasing production in the supporting industries and helped to maintain liaison with the front-line trenches by lending eyes to transportation, it was also doing its part at the battle front. Huge search-lights revealed the submarine and the aërial bomber; flares exposed the manœuvers of the enemy; rockets brought aid to beleaguered vessels and troops; pistol lights fired by the aërial observer directed artillery fire; and many other devices of artificial light were in the fray. Many improvements were made in search-lights and in signaling devices and the elements of the festive fireworks of past ages were improved and developed for the needs of modern warfare.
When the recent war started, science answered the call and, under intense pressure, sped up the normal progress of half a century into just a few years. The airplane, which in 1914 was seen as a risky toy for daredevils, emerged from the war as a highly developed aircraft. While artificial lighting didn’t have the excitement of flying or the novelty of chemical warfare, it advanced significantly in certain areas and contributed effectively. As artificial lighting waged its quiet battle by boosting production in supporting industries and helping maintain communication with the front-line trenches by illuminating transport, it also played a role on the battlefield. Massive searchlights revealed submarines and enemy bombers; flares illuminated the enemy's movements; rockets provided assistance to trapped ships and troops; and pistol lights shot by aerial observers directed artillery fire; along with many other artificial light devices that joined the fight. There were numerous enhancements made in searchlights and signaling tools, and the elements of festive fireworks from earlier times were refined and adapted for modern warfare needs.
Night after night along the battle front flares were sent up to reveal patrols and any other enemy activity. On the slightest suspicion great swarms of these brilliant lights would burst forth as though flocks of huge fireflies had been disturbed. They were even used as light barrages, for movements could be executed in comparative safety when a large number of these lights lay before the enemy's trenches sputtering their brilliant light. The airman dropped flares to illuminate his target or his landing field. The torches of past parades aided the soldier in his night operations and rockets sent skyward radiated their messages to headquarters in the rear. The star-shell had the same missions as other flares, but it was projected by a charge of powder from a gun. These and many modifications represent the useful applications of what formerly were mere "fireworks." Those which are primarily signaling devices are discussed in another chapter, but the others will be described sufficiently to indicate the place which artificial light played in certain phases of warfare.
Night after night along the battlefront, flares were launched to expose patrols and any enemy activity. At the slightest suspicion, massive swarms of these brilliant lights would burst forth as if flocks of giant fireflies had been disturbed. They were even used as light barrages, allowing movements to happen with relative safety when a large number of these lights were in front of the enemy's trenches, flickering with their intense glow. The airman dropped flares to light up his target or his landing area. The torches from past parades helped soldiers during night operations, and rockets shot into the sky conveyed their messages to headquarters in the back. The star-shell had the same purposes as other flares but was launched by a powder charge from a gun. These and many variations show the practical uses of what were once just "fireworks." Those that primarily serve as signaling devices are discussed in another chapter, but the others will be described enough to illustrate the role artificial light played in certain aspects of warfare.
The illuminating compounds used in these devices are not particularly new, consisting essentially of a combustible powder and chemical salts which make the flame luminous and give it color when desired. Among the ingredients are barium nitrate, potassium perchlorate, powdered aluminum, powdered magnesium, potassium nitrate, and sulphur. One of the simplest mixtures used by the English is,
The bright compounds used in these devices aren't exactly new; they mainly consist of a flammable powder and chemical salts that make the flame shine and add color if needed. Some of the ingredients include barium nitrate, potassium perchlorate, powdered aluminum, powdered magnesium, potassium nitrate, and sulfur. One of the simplest mixtures used by the English is,
Barium nitrate | 37 per cent. |
Powdered magnesium | 34 per cent. |
Potassium nitrate | 29 per cent. |
The magnesium is coated with hot wax or paraffin, which not only acts as a binder for the mixture when it is pressed into its container but also serves to prevent oxidation of the magnesium when the shells are stored. The barium and potassium nitrates supply the oxygen to the magnesium, which burns with a brilliant white flame. The potassium nitrate takes fire more readily than the barium nitrate, but it is more expensive than the latter.
The magnesium is covered in hot wax or paraffin, which not only holds the mixture together when it's pressed into its container but also helps to stop the magnesium from oxidizing while the shells are stored. The barium and potassium nitrates provide the oxygen for the magnesium, which burns with a bright white flame. Potassium nitrate ignites more easily than barium nitrate, but it also costs more than the latter.
Owing to the cost of magnesium, powdered aluminum has been used to some extent as a substitute. Aluminum does not have the illuminating value of magnesium and it is more difficult to ignite, but it is a good substitute in case of necessity. An English mixture containing these elements is,
Owing to the cost of magnesium, powdered aluminum has been used to some extent as a substitute. Aluminum doesn’t have the brightness of magnesium and is harder to ignite, but it works well as a backup when needed. An English mixture containing these elements is,
Barium nitrate | 58 per cent. |
Magnesium | 29 per cent. |
Aluminum | 13 per cent. |
Mixtures which are slow to ignite must be supplemented by a primary mixture which is readily ignited. For obtaining colored lights it is only necessary to add chemicals which will give the desired color. The mixtures can be proportioned by means of purely theoretical considerations; that is, just enough oxygen can be present to burn the fuel completely. However, usually more oxygen is supplied than called for by theory.
Mixtures that take a long time to ignite should be combined with a primary mixture that lights easily. To create colored lights, you just need to add chemicals that produce the desired color. The mixtures can be measured based on theoretical calculations; in other words, just enough oxygen should be present to burn the fuel completely. However, it's common to provide more oxygen than theoretically required.
The illuminating shell is perhaps the most useful of these devices to the soldier. It has been constructed with and without parachutes, the former providing an intense light for a brief period because it falls rapidly. These shells of the larger calibers are equipped with time-fuses and are generally rather elaborate in construction. The shell is of steel, and has a time-fuse at the tip. This fuse ignites a charge of black powder in the nose of the shell and this explosion ejects the star-shell out of the rear of the steel casing. At the same time the black powder ignites the priming mixture next to it, which in turn ignites the slow-burning illuminating compound. The star-shell has a large parachute of strong material folded in the rear of the casing and the cardboard tube containing the illuminating mixture is attached to it. The time of burning varies, but is ordinarily less than a minute. Certain structural details must be such as to endure the stresses of a high muzzle velocity. Furthermore, a velocity of perhaps 1000 feet per second still obtains when the star-shell with its parachute is ejected at the desired point in the air.
The illuminating shell is probably the most useful device for soldiers. It’s made both with and without parachutes, with the former providing a bright light for a short time because it falls quickly. The larger caliber shells come with time fuses and are usually quite complex in design. The shell is made of steel and has a time fuse at the tip. This fuse ignites a charge of black powder in the nose of the shell, causing an explosion that ejects the star shell from the back of the steel casing. At the same time, the black powder ignites the priming mixture next to it, which then sets off the slow-burning illuminating compound. The star shell has a large parachute made of strong material folded in the back of the casing, and the cardboard tube containing the illuminating mixture is attached to it. The burn time varies but is usually less than a minute. Certain structural details need to be designed to withstand the forces of high muzzle velocity. Additionally, a speed of around 1,000 feet per second is achieved when the star shell with its parachute is ejected at the right point in the air.
The non-parachute illuminating shell is designed to give an intense light for a brief interval and is especially applicable to defense against air raids. Such a light aims to reveal the aircraft in order that the gunners may fire at it effectively. These shells are fitted with time-fuses which fire the charge of black powder at the desired interval after the discharge of the shell from the gun. The contents of the shell are thereby ejected and ignited. The container for the illuminating material is so designed that there is rapid combustion and consequently a brilliant light for about ten seconds. The enemy airman in this short time is unable to obtain any valuable knowledge pertaining to the earth below and furthermore he is likely to be temporarily blinded by the brilliant light if it is near him.
The non-parachute illuminating shell is made to produce a bright light for a short time and is particularly useful for defending against air raids. This light is meant to expose the aircraft so that gunners can shoot at it accurately. These shells have time fuses that ignite the black powder charge at a set moment after the shell is fired from the gun. The shell’s contents are then released and ignited. The container for the illuminating material is designed for quick combustion, resulting in a bright light lasting about ten seconds. During this brief period, the enemy pilot cannot gather any useful information about what’s below, and if the light is close enough, he is likely to be temporarily blinded by the intense brightness.
The rifle-light which resembles an ordinary rocket, is fired from a rifle and is designed for short-range use. It consists of a steel cylindrical shell a few inches long fastened to a steel rod. A parachute is attached to the cardboard container in which the illuminating mixture is packed and the whole is stowed away in the steel shell. Shore delay-fuses are used for starting the usual cycle of events after the rifle-light has been fired from the gun. The steel rod is injected into the barrel of a rifle and a blank cartridge is used for ejecting this rocket-like apparatus. Owing to inertia the firing-pin in the shell operates and the short delay-fuse is thus fired automatically an instant after the trigger of the rifle is pulled.
The rifle-light, which looks like a regular rocket, is fired from a rifle and is meant for short-range use. It consists of a steel cylindrical shell a few inches long attached to a steel rod. A parachute is connected to the cardboard container holding the illuminating mixture, and everything is packed inside the steel shell. Shore delay-fuses are used to initiate the usual sequence of events after the rifle-light is fired from the gun. The steel rod is placed into the barrel of a rifle, and a blank cartridge is used to launch this rocket-like device. Due to inertia, the firing pin in the shell activates, causing the short delay-fuse to ignite automatically just after the rifle's trigger is pulled.
Illuminating "bombs" of the same general principles are used by airmen in search of a landing for himself or for a destructive bomb; in signaling to a gunner, and in many other ways. They are simple in construction because they need not withstand the stresses of being fired from a gun; they are merely dropped from the aircraft. The mechanism of ignition and the cycle of events which follow are similar to those of other illuminating shells.
Illuminating "bombs" that work on the same general principles are used by pilots looking for a landing spot for themselves or for dropping a destructive bomb; in signaling to a gunner, and in various other applications. They are straightforward in design because they don't have to endure the pressures of being shot from a gun; they are just released from the aircraft. The ignition mechanism and the sequence of events that follow are similar to those of other illuminating shells.
The value of such artificial-lighting devices depends both upon luminous intensity and time of burning. Although long-burning is not generally required in warfare, it is obvious that more than a momentary light is usually needed. In general, high candle-power and long-burning are opposed to each other, so that the most intense lights of this character usually are of short duration. Typical performances of two flares of the same composition are as follows:
The value of these artificial-lighting devices depends on both their brightness and how long they last. While long burn times aren't typically necessary in warfare, it's clear that a light lasting longer than just a moment is usually needed. Generally, high brightness and long burn times work against each other, meaning that the brightest lights of this type usually last for a short time. Typical performances of two flares made from the same materials are as follows:
The illuminating compound was the same in these two flares, which differed only in the time allowed for burning. Of course, the measurements of the luminous intensity of such flares is difficult because of the fluctuations, but within the errors of the measurements it is seen that the illuminating power of the compound is about the same regardless of the time of burning. The light-source in the case of burning powders is really a flame, and inasmuch as the burning end hangs downward, more light is emitted in the lower hemisphere than in the upper. The candle-power of the largest flares equals the combined luminous intensities of 200 street arc-lamps or of 10,000 ordinary 40-watt tungsten lamps such as are used in residence lighting.
The glowing compound was the same in these two flares, which only differed in their burn time. Of course, measuring the brightness of these flares is tricky because of the variations, but within the measurement errors, it shows that the brightness of the compound is about the same no matter how long it burns. In the case of burning powders, the light source is essentially a flame, and since the burning end hangs downward, it releases more light in the lower hemisphere than in the upper. The brightness of the largest flares is equivalent to the combined brightness of 200 street arc lamps or 10,000 standard 40-watt tungsten lamps like those used for home lighting.
It is interesting to note the candle-hours obtained per cubic inch of compound and to find that the cost of this light is less than that of candles at the present time and only five or ten times greater than that of modern electric lighting.
It’s interesting to see the candle-hours produced per cubic inch of the compound and to find that the cost of this light is lower than that of candles today and is only five to ten times higher than modern electric lighting.
Illuminating shells in use during the recent war were designed for muzzle velocities as high as 2700 feet per second and were gaged to ignite at any distance from a quarter of a mile to several miles. The maximum range of illuminating shells fired from rifles was about 200 yards; for trench mortars about one mile; and from field and naval guns about four miles.
Illuminating shells used during the recent war were designed for muzzle velocities of up to 2700 feet per second and were set to ignite at distances ranging from a quarter of a mile to several miles. The maximum range of illuminating shells fired from rifles was about 200 yards; from trench mortars, about one mile; and from field and naval guns, about four miles.
The search-light has long been a valuable aid in warfare and during the recent conflict considerable attention was given to its development and application. It is used chiefly for detecting and illuminating distant targets, but this covers a wide range of conditions and requirements. In order that a search-light may be effective at a great distance, as much as possible of the light emitted by a source is directed into a beam of light of as nearly parallel rays as can be obtained. Reflectors are usually employed in military search-lights, and in order that the beam may be as nearly parallel (minimum divergence) as possible, the light must be emitted by the smallest source compatible with high intensity. This source is placed at the proper point in respect to a large parabolic reflecter which renders the rays parallel or nearly so.
The searchlight has long been a valuable tool in warfare, and during the recent conflict, significant focus was placed on its development and use. It’s primarily used for spotting and illuminating distant targets, which involves a broad range of conditions and needs. For a searchlight to be effective over long distances, as much light as possible from the source is concentrated into a beam of nearly parallel rays. Military searchlights typically use reflectors, and to achieve a beam that is as close to parallel (with minimal divergence) as possible, the light must come from the smallest source that still provides high intensity. This source is positioned correctly in relation to a large parabolic reflector that makes the rays parallel or nearly so.
Ever since its advent the electric arc has been employed in large search-lights, with which the army and the navy were supplied; however, the greatest improvements have been made under the stress of war. The science of aëronautics advanced so rapidly during the recent war that the necessity for powerful search-lights was greatly augmented and as the conflict progressed the enemy airmen came to look upon the newly developed ones with considerable concern. The rapidly moving aircraft and its high altitude brought new factors into the design of these lights. It now became necessary to have the most intense beam and to be able to sweep the heavens with it by means of delicate controlling apparatus, for the targets were sometimes minute specks moving at high speed at altitudes as high as five miles. Furthermore, owing to the shifting battle areas, mobile apparatus was necessary.
Since it was first introduced, the electric arc has been used in large searchlights for the army and navy; however, the biggest advancements came during wartime. The field of aeronautics progressed so quickly during the recent war that the need for powerful searchlights increased significantly, and as the conflict continued, enemy pilots began to view the newly developed lights with a great deal of concern. The fast-moving aircraft and their high altitudes introduced new challenges in designing these lights. It became essential to create the most intense beam and to have the ability to scan the sky with it using precise control equipment, as the targets were sometimes tiny dots traveling at high speeds at altitudes of up to five miles. Additionally, due to the changing battlefields, portable equipment was needed.
The control of light by means of reflectors has been studied for centuries, but until the advent of the electric arc the light-sources were of such large areas that effective control was impossible. Optical devices generally are considered in connection with "point sources," but inasmuch as no light can be obtained from a point, a source of small dimensions and of high brightness is the most effective compromise. Parabolic mirrors were in use in the eighteenth century and their properties were known long before the first search-light worthy of the name was made in 1825 by Drummond, who used as a source of light a piece of lime heated to incandescence in a blast flame. He finally developed the "lime-light" by directing an oxyhydrogen flame upon a piece of lime and this device was adapted to search-lights and to indoor projection. It is said that the first search-light to be used in warfare was a Drummond lime-light which played a part in the attack on Fort Wagner at Charleston in 1863.
The control of light using reflectors has been studied for centuries, but before the electric arc, the light sources were so large that effective control was impractical. Optical devices are usually considered in relation to "point sources," but since you can’t draw light from a point, a small and highly bright source is the best compromise. Parabolic mirrors were used in the eighteenth century, and their properties were known long before the first real searchlight was created in 1825 by Drummond, who used a piece of lime heated to incandescence in a blast flame as his light source. He eventually developed the "lime-light" by focusing an oxyhydrogen flame on a piece of lime, which was then adapted for searchlights and indoor projection. It's said that the first searchlight used in warfare was a Drummond lime-light, which played a role in the attack on Fort Wagner at Charleston in 1863.
In 1848 the first electric arc lamp used for general lighting was installed in Paris. It was supplied with current by a large voltaic cell, but the success of the electric arc was obliged to await the development of a more satisfactory source of electricity. A score of years was destined to elapse, after the public was amazed by the first demonstration, before a suitable electric dynamo was invented. With the advent of the dynamo, the electric arc was rapidly developed and thus there became available a concentrated light-source of high intensity and great brilliancy. Gradually the size was increased, until at the present time mirrors as large as seven feet in diameter and electric currents as great as several hundred amperes are employed. The beam intensities of the most powerful search-lights are now as great as several hundred million candles.
In 1848, the first electric arc lamp for general lighting was installed in Paris. It was powered by a large voltaic cell, but the success of the electric arc had to wait for a better source of electricity. It took about twenty years after the public was wowed by the first demonstration before a suitable electric dynamo was created. With the arrival of the dynamo, the electric arc quickly advanced and provided a concentrated light source of high intensity and brightness. Over time, the size increased, and now mirrors as large as seven feet in diameter and electric currents of several hundred amperes are used. The beam intensities of the most powerful searchlights can now reach several hundred million candles.
The most notable advance in the design of arc search-lights was achieved in recent years by Beck, who developed an intensive flame carbon-arc. His chief object was to send a much greater current through the arc than had been done previously without increasing the size of the carbons and the unsteadiness of the arc. In the ordinary arc excessive current causes the carbons to disintegrate rapidly unless they are of large diameter. Beck directed a stream of alcohol vapor at the arc and they were kept from oxidizing. He thus achieved a high current-density and much greater beam intensities. He also used cored carbons containing certain metallic salts which added to the luminous intensity, and by rotation of the positive carbon so that the crater was kept in a constant position, greater steadiness and uniformity were obtained. Tests show that, in addition to its higher luminous efficiency, an arc of this character directs a greater percentage of the light into the effective angle of the mirror. The small source results in a beam of small divergence; in other words, the beam differs from a cylinder by only one or two degrees. If the beam consisted entirely of parallel rays and if there were no loss of light in the atmosphere by scattering or by absorption, the beam intensity would be the same throughout its entire length. However, both divergence and atmospheric losses tend to reduce the intensity of the beam as the distance from the search-light increases.
The biggest improvement in the design of arc searchlights recently came from Beck, who created a high-intensity flame carbon-arc. His main goal was to pass a much larger current through the arc than ever before without making the carbons larger or the arc more unstable. In traditional arcs, too much current causes the carbons to disintegrate quickly unless they're really thick. Beck directed a stream of alcohol vapor at the arc to prevent oxidation. This allowed him to achieve a high current density and much brighter beam intensities. He also used cored carbons with specific metallic salts to increase the luminous intensity and rotated the positive carbon to keep the crater in a stable position, which improved steadiness and uniformity. Tests indicate that, besides its higher luminous efficiency, this type of arc sends a larger portion of its light into the effective angle of the mirror. The small source produces a beam with minimal divergence; in other words, the beam differs from a cylinder by only one or two degrees. If the beam consisted entirely of parallel rays and there were no loss of light due to scattering or absorption in the atmosphere, the beam intensity would remain the same along its entire length. However, both divergence and atmospheric losses tend to reduce the intensity of the beam as the distance from the searchlight increases.
Inasmuch as the intensity of the beam depends upon the actual brightness of the light-source, the brightness of a few modern light-sources are of interest. These are expressed in candles per square inch of projected area; that is, if a small hole in a sheet of metal is placed next to the light-source and the intensity of the light passing through this hole is measured, the brightness of the hole is easily determined in candles per square inch.
Insofar as the strength of the beam relies on the actual brightness of the light source, the brightness of some modern light sources is noteworthy. This is measured in candles per square inch of projected area; that is, if a small hole in a sheet of metal is positioned next to the light source and the intensity of the light passing through this hole is measured, the brightness of the hole can be easily determined in candles per square inch.
Brightness of Light-Sources in Candles per Square Inch
Brightness of Light Sources in Candles per Square Inch
Kerosene flame | 5 to | 10 |
Acetylene | 30 to | 60 |
Gas-mantle | 30 to | 500 |
Tungsten filament (vacuum) lamp | 750 to | 1,200 |
Tungsten filament (gas-filled) lamp | 3,500 to | 18,000 |
Magnetite arc | 4,000 to | 6,000 |
Carbon arc for search-lights | 80,000 to | 90,000 |
Flame arc for search-lights | 250,000 to | 350,000 |
Sun (computed mean) | about 1,000,000 |
As the reflector of a search-light is an exceedingly important factor in obtaining high beam-intensities, considerable attention has been given to it since the practicable electric arc appeared. The parabolic mirror has the property of rendering parallel, or nearly so, the rays from a light-source placed at its focus. If the mirror subtends a large angle at the light-source, a greater amount of light is intercepted and rendered parallel than in the case of smaller subtended angles; hence, mirrors are large and of as short focus as practicable. Search-light projectors direct from 30 to 60 per cent. of the available light into the beam, but with lens systems the effective angle is so small that a much smaller percentage is delivered in the beam. Mangin in 1874 made a reflector of glass in which both outer and inner surfaces were spherical but of different radii of curvature, so that the reflector was thicker in the middle. This device was "silvered" on the outside and the refraction in the glass, as the light passed through it to the mirror and back again, corrected the spherical aberration of the mirrored surface. These have been extensively used. Many combinations of curved surfaces have been developed for special projection purposes, but the parabolic mirror is still in favor for powerful search-lights. The tip of the positive carbon is placed at its focus and the effective angle in which light is intercepted by the mirror is generally about 125 degrees. Within this angle is included a large portion of the light emitted by the light-source in the case of direct-current arcs. If this angle is increased for a mirror of a given diameter by decreasing its focal length, the divergence of the beam is increased and the beam-intensity is diminished. This is due to the fact that the light-source now becomes apparently larger; that is, being of a given size it now subtends a larger angle at the reflector and departs more from the theoretical point.
As the reflector of a searchlight is a crucial element in achieving high beam intensities, it has received a lot of attention since the development of the electric arc. The parabolic mirror can make the rays from a light source placed at its focus parallel, or nearly so. If the mirror captures a larger angle from the light source, it intercepts and parallels more light than when smaller angles are used; therefore, mirrors are designed to be large and as short in focus as possible. Searchlight projectors can direct 30 to 60 percent of the available light into the beam, but with lens systems, the effective angle is so small that a much smaller percentage makes it into the beam. In 1874, Mangin created a glass reflector with both outer and inner surfaces being spherical but with different radii of curvature, making the reflector thicker in the center. This design was "silvered" on the outside, and the refraction of light through the glass, as it passed to the mirror and back, corrected the spherical aberration of the mirrored surface. These have seen extensive use. Many combinations of curved surfaces have been developed for specific projection needs, but the parabolic mirror is still preferred for powerful searchlights. The tip of the positive carbon is placed at its focus, and the effective angle in which the mirror intercepts light is usually around 125 degrees. This angle includes a significant portion of the light emitted by the light source in cases of direct-current arcs. If this angle is increased for a mirror of a given diameter by reducing its focal length, the beam diverges more, resulting in decreased beam intensity. This happens because the light source appears larger; in other words, for a fixed size, it now subtends a wider angle at the reflector and moves further away from the theoretical point.
When the recent war began the search-lights available were intended generally for fixed installations. These were "barrel" lights with reflectors several feet in diameter, the whole output sometimes weighing as much as several tons. Shortly after the entrance of this country into the war, a mobile "barrel" search-light five feet in diameter was produced, which, complete with carriage, weighed only 1800 pounds. Later there were further improvements. An example of the impetus which the stress of war gives to technical accomplishments is found in the development of a particular mobile searchlight. Two months after the War Department submitted the problems of design to certain large industrial establishments a new 60-inch search-light was placed in production. It weighed one fifth as much as the previous standard; it had one twentieth the bulk; it was much simpler; it could be built in one fourth the time; and it cost half as much. Remote control of the apparatus has been highly developed in order that the operator may be at a distance from the scattered light near the unit. If he is near the search-light, this veil of diffused light very seriously interferes with his vision.
When the recent war began, the searchlights available were mostly intended for fixed setups. These were "barrel" lights with reflectors several feet wide, and the entire system could weigh as much as several tons. Shortly after the entry of into the war, a mobile "barrel" searchlight, five feet in diameter, was created that weighed just 1,800 pounds, including its carriage. Later on, there were further enhancements. A clear example of how war can drive technological progress is seen in the development of a specific mobile searchlight. Just two months after the War Department presented the design challenges to some major industrial companies, a new 60-inch searchlight went into production. It weighed one-fifth as much as the earlier standard, had one-twentieth the size, was much simpler, could be manufactured in a quarter of the time, and cost half as much. The remote control of the device has been significantly advanced so that the operator can remain at a distance from the bright light near the unit. If he is close to the searchlight, the spread of light seriously hampers his sight.
Mobile power-units were necessary and the types developed used the automobile engine as the prime mover. In one the generator is located in front of the engine and supported beyond the automobile chassis. In another type the generator is located between the automobile transmission and the differential. A standard clutch and gear-shift lever is employed to connect the engine either with the generator or with the propeller shaft of the truck. The first type included a 115-volt, 15-kilowatt generator, a 36-inch wheel barrel search-light, and 500 feet of wire cable. The second type included a 105-volt, 20-kilowatt generator, a 60-inch open searchlight, and 600 feet of cable. This type has been extended in magnitude to include a 50-kilowatt generator. When these units are moved, the search-light and its carriage are loaded upon the rear of the mobile generating equipment. An idea of the intensities obtainable with the largest apparatus is gained from illumination produced at a given distance. For example, the 15-kilowatt search-light with highly concentrated beam, produced an illumination at 930 feet of 280 foot-candles. At this point this is the equivalent of the illumination produced by a source having a luminous intensity of nearly 250,000,000 candles.
Mobile power units were essential, and the types developed used automobile engines as the main power source. In one type, the generator is positioned in front of the engine and supported beyond the car’s chassis. In another type, the generator is situated between the car's transmission and the differential. A standard clutch and gear-shift lever is used to connect the engine either to the generator or to the truck’s propeller shaft. The first type featured a 115-volt, 15-kilowatt generator, a 36-inch wheelbarrow searchlight, and 500 feet of wire cable. The second type included a 105-volt, 20-kilowatt generator, a 60-inch open searchlight, and 600 feet of cable. This type has been expanded to include a 50-kilowatt generator. When these units are transported, the searchlight and its support are loaded onto the back of the mobile generating equipment. An idea of the brightness achievable with the largest setup can be understood from the illumination produced at a specific distance. For example, the 15-kilowatt searchlight, with a highly concentrated beam, produced illumination of 280 foot-candles at a distance of 930 feet. At this point, this is equivalent to the brightness produced by a source with a luminous intensity of nearly 250,000,000 candles.
Of course, the range at which search-lights are effective is the factor of most importance, but this depends upon a number of conditions such as the illumination produced by the beam at various distances, the atmospheric conditions, the position of the observer, the size, pattern, color, and reflection-factor of the object, and the color, pattern, and reflection-factor of the background. These are too involved to be discussed here, but it may be stated that under ordinary conditions these powerful lights are effective at distances of several miles. According to recent work, it appears that the range of a search-light in revealing a given object under fixed conditions varies about as the fourth root of its intensity.
The range at which searchlights work effectively is the most important factor, but it relies on several conditions such as the brightness of the beam at different distances, weather conditions, the observer's position, the size, shape, color, and reflectivity of the object, and the color, shape, and reflectivity of the background. These factors are too complex to discuss here, but it's worth noting that under normal conditions, these powerful lights can reach several miles. Recent studies suggest that the range of a searchlight in detecting a specific object under consistent conditions relates approximately to the fourth root of its intensity.
Although the metallic parabolic reflector is used in the most powerful search-lights, there have been many other developments adapted to warfare. Fresnel lenses have been used above the arc for search-lights whose beams are directed upward in search of aircraft, thus replacing the mirror below the arc, which, owing to its position, is always in danger of deterioration by the hot carbon particles dropping upon it. For short ranges incandescent filament lamps have been used with success. Oxyacetylene equipment has found application, owing to its portability. The oxyacetylene flame is concentrated upon a small pellet of ceria, which provides a brilliant source of small dimensions. A tank containing about 1000 liters of dissolved acetylene and another containing about 1100 liters of oxygen supply the fuel. A beam having an intensity of about 1,500,000 candles is obtained with a consumption of 40 liters of each of the gases per hour. At this rate the search-light may be operated twenty hours without replenishing.
Although metallic parabolic reflectors are used in the most powerful searchlights, there have been many other technological advancements adapted for warfare. Fresnel lenses have been used above the arc for searchlights aimed at detecting aircraft, replacing the mirror below the arc, which is always at risk of damage from hot carbon particles falling on it. For short ranges, incandescent filament lamps have been successfully utilized. Oxyacetylene equipment has become popular due to its portability. The oxyacetylene flame is focused on a small pellet of ceria, creating a bright source that takes up little space. A tank holding about 1,000 liters of dissolved acetylene and another with around 1,100 liters of oxygen provide the fuel. This setup produces a beam with an intensity of about 1,500,000 candles, consuming 40 liters of each gas per hour. At this rate, the searchlight can run for twenty hours without needing a refill.
Although the beacon-light for nocturnal airmen is a development which will assume much importance in peaceful activities, it was developed chiefly to meet the requirements of warfare. These do not differ materially from those which guide the mariner, except that the traveler in the aërial ocean is far above the plane on which the beacon rests. For this reason the lenses are designed to send light generally upward. In foreign countries several types of beacons for aërial navigation have been in use. In one the light from the source is freely emitted in all upward directions, but the light normally emitted into the lower hemisphere is turned upward by means of prisms. In a more elaborate type, belts of lenses are arranged so as to send light in all directions above the horizontal plane. A flashing apparatus is used to designate the locality by the number or character of the flashes. Electric filaments and acetylene flames have been used as the light-sources for this purpose. In another type the light is concentrated in one azimuth and the whole beacon is revolved. Portable beacons employing gas were used during the war on some of the flying-fields near the battle front.
Although the beacon light for night-time pilots is a development that will play a significant role in peaceful activities, it was primarily created to meet the needs of wartime operations. These needs are not much different from those that guide sailors, except that the traveler in the sky is much higher than the surface where the beacon is positioned. For this reason, the lenses are designed to direct light mainly upward. In other countries, several types of beacons for air navigation have been in use. In one design, the light from the source is emitted freely in all upward directions, but the light typically emitted into the lower half is redirected upward using prisms. In a more advanced version, strips of lenses are arranged to project light in all directions above the horizontal plane. A flashing system is used to indicate the location by the number or pattern of the flashes. Electric filaments and acetylene flames have been utilized as the light sources for this purpose. In another type, the light is focused in one direction, and the entire beacon rotates. Portable gas-powered beacons were used during the war at some of the airfields near the front lines.
All kinds of lighting and lighting-devices were used depending upon the needs and material available. Even self-luminous paint was used for various purposes at the front, as well as for illuminating watch-dials and the scales of instruments. Wooden buttons two or three inches in diameter covered with self-luminous paint could be fixed wherever desired and thus serve as landmarks. They are visible only at short distances and the feebleness of their light made them particularly valuable for various purposes at the battle front. They could be used in the hand for giving optical signals at a short distance where silence was essential. Self-luminous arrows and signs directed troops and trucks at night and even stretcher-bearers have borne self-luminous marks on their backs in order to identify them to their friends.
All kinds of lighting and lighting devices were used based on the needs and materials available. Even glow-in-the-dark paint was applied for various purposes at the front, and it was used to light up watch dials and instrument scales. Wooden buttons, about two to three inches in diameter and coated with glow-in-the-dark paint, could be placed anywhere needed, serving as landmarks. They are visible only at short distances, and the dimness of their light made them especially useful for various tasks at the battle front. They could be held in hand to send optical signals over short distances where silence was crucial. Glow-in-the-dark arrows and signs guided troops and trucks at night, and even stretcher-bearers carried glow-in-the-dark markings on their backs to identify themselves to their comrades.
Somewhat analogous to this application of luminous paint is the use of blue light at night on battle-ships and other vessels in action or near the enemy. Several years ago a Brazilian battle-ship built in this country was equipped with a dual lighting-system. The extra one used deep-blue light, which is very effective for eyes adapted to darkness or to very low intensities of illumination and is a short-range light. Owing to the low luminous intensity of the blue lights they do not carry far; and furthermore, it is well established that blue light does not penetrate as far through ordinary atmosphere as lights of other colors of the same intensity.
Somewhat similar to the use of bright paint is the application of blue light at night on battleships and other vessels in combat or near the enemy. Several years ago, a Brazilian battleship built in this country was fitted with a dual lighting system. The extra lighting used deep blue light, which is very effective for eyes that are adjusted to darkness or very low light levels and is a short-range light. Because of the low brightness of the blue lights, they don’t shine far; plus, it's well known that blue light doesn’t penetrate as far through the regular atmosphere as lights of other colors with the same brightness.
XV
SIGNALING
From earliest times the beacon-fire has sent forth messages from hilltops or across inaccessible places. In this country, when the Indian was monarch of the vast areas of forest and prairie, he spread news broadcast to roving tribesmen by means of the signal-fire, and he flashed his code by covering and uncovering it. Castaways, whether in fiction or in reality, instinctively turn to the beacon-fire as a mode of attracting a passing ship. On every hand throughout the ages this simple means of communication has been employed; therefore, it is not surprising that mankind has applied his ingenuity to the perfection of signaling by means of light, which has its own peculiar fields and advantages. Of course, wireless telephony and telegraphy will replace light-signaling to some extent, but there are many fields in which the last-named is still supreme. In fact, during the recent war much use was made of light in this manner and devices were developed despite the many other available means of signaling. One of the chief advantages of light as a signal is that it is so easily controlled and directed in a straight line. Wireless waves, for example, are radiated broadcast to be intercepted by the enemy.
From ancient times, beacon fires have transmitted messages from hilltops or across hard-to-reach places. In this country, when Native Americans ruled the vast forests and prairies, they spread news widely to wandering tribes using signal fires and communicated their messages by covering and uncovering them. Whether in stories or real life, castaways instinctively turn to beacon fires to attract passing ships. Throughout history, this simple form of communication has been used everywhere; therefore, it’s not surprising that people have applied their creativity to improve signaling with light, which has its own unique benefits. Of course, wireless phone and telegraph technology will take over light signaling to some degree, but there are still many areas where light signaling remains unmatched. In fact, during the recent war, light was extensively used in this way, and new devices were created despite the many other available signaling methods. One of the main advantages of light as a signal is that it can be easily controlled and directed in a straight line. Wireless waves, for example, are broadcast widely and can be intercepted by the enemy.
The beginning of light-signaling is hidden in the obscurity of the past. Of course, the most primitive light-signals were wood fires, but it is likely that man early utilized the mirror to reflect the sun's image and thus laid the foundation of the modern heliograph. The Book of Job, which is probably one of the oldest writings available, mentions molten mirrors. The Egyptians in the time of Moses used mirrors of polished brass. Euclid in the third century before the Christian era is said to have written a treatise in which he discussed the reflection of light by concave mirrors. John Peckham, Archbishop of Canterbury in the thirteenth century, described mirrors of polished steel and of glass backed with lead. Mirrors of glass coated with an alloy of tin and mercury were made by the Venetians in the sixteenth century. Huygens in the seventeenth century studied the laws of refraction and reflection and devised optical apparatus for various purposes. However, it was not until the eighteenth century that any noteworthy attempts were made to control artificial light for practical purposes. Dollond in 1757 was the first to make achromatic lenses by using combinations of different glasses. Lavoisier in 1774 made a lens about four feet in diameter by constructing a cell of two concave glasses and filling it with water and other liquids. It is said that he ignited wood and melted metals by concentrating the sun's image upon them by means of this lens. About that time Buffon made a built-up parabolic mirror by means of several hundred small plane mirrors set at the proper angles. With this he set fire to wood at a distance of more than two hundred feet by concentrating the sun's rays. He is said also to have made a lens from a solid piece of glass by grinding it in concentric steps similar to the designs worked out by Fresnel seventy years later. These are examples of the early work which laid the foundation for the highly perfected control of light of the present time.
The start of light signaling is shrouded in the murkiness of history. Naturally, the simplest light signals were wood fires, but it's likely that early humans used mirrors to reflect sunlight, setting the stage for the modern heliograph. The Book of Job, which is probably one of the oldest written texts, mentions molten mirrors. The Egyptians during Moses's time used polished brass mirrors. Euclid, in the third century BCE, reportedly wrote a treatise discussing light reflection with concave mirrors. John Peckham, the Archbishop of Canterbury in the thirteenth century, described mirrors made of polished steel and glass backed with lead. In the sixteenth century, Venetians created glass mirrors coated with an alloy of tin and mercury. Huygens, in the seventeenth century, studied the laws of refraction and reflection and designed optical devices for various uses. However, it wasn't until the eighteenth century that significant efforts were made to control artificial light for practical applications. Dollond, in 1757, became the first to create achromatic lenses by combining different types of glass. Lavoisier, in 1774, constructed a lens about four feet in diameter by making a cell with two concave glasses filled with water and other liquids. It's said that he ignited wood and melted metals by focusing sunlight with this lens. Around the same time, Buffon created a composite parabolic mirror made from several hundred small plane mirrors positioned at the right angles. With this setup, he ignited wood from more than two hundred feet away by concentrating the sun's rays. He is also said to have crafted a lens from a solid piece of glass by grinding it in concentric steps similar to the designs developed by Fresnel seventy years later. These are examples of the early advancements that laid the groundwork for today's highly refined control of light.
While engaged in the survey of Ireland, Thomas Drummond in 1826 devised apparatus for signaling many miles, thus facilitating triangulation. Distances as great as eighty miles were encountered and it appeared desirable to have some method for seeing a point at these great distances. Gauss in 1822 used the reflection of the sun's image from a plane mirror and Drummond also tried this means. The latter was successful in signaling 45 miles to a station which because of haze could not be seen, or even the hill upon which it rested. Having demonstrated the feasibility of the plan, he set about making a device which would include a powerful artificial light in order to be independent of the sun. In earlier geodetic surveys Argand lamps had been employed with parabolic reflectors and with convex lenses, but apparently these did not have a sufficient range. Fresnel and Arago constructed a lens consisting of a series of concentric rings which were cemented together, and on placing this before an Argand lamp possessing four concentric wicks, they obtained a light which was observed at forty-eight miles.
While surveying Ireland, Thomas Drummond invented a signaling device in 1826 that allowed communication over many miles, making triangulation easier. He encountered distances of up to eighty miles and realized there was a need for a way to see a point at such long distances. In 1822, Gauss used the sun's reflection from a plane mirror, and Drummond tried this approach as well. He successfully signaled over 45 miles to a station that was obscured by haze, rendering it invisible, even the hill it was on. After proving the plan was viable, he worked on creating a device that used a powerful artificial light to rely on something other than the sun. Earlier geodetic surveys had used Argand lamps with parabolic reflectors and convex lenses, but these apparently lacked the necessary range. Fresnel and Arago developed a lens made of a series of concentric rings that were glued together, and when this was used in front of an Argand lamp with four concentric wicks, they achieved a light that was seen at forty-eight miles.
Despite these successes, Drummond believed the parabolic mirror and a more powerful light-source afforded the best combination for a signal-light. In searching for a brilliant light-source he experimented with phosphorus burning in oxygen and with various brilliant pyrotechnical preparations. However, flames were unsteady and generally unsuitable. He then turned in the direction which led to his development of the lime-light. In his first apparatus he used a small sphere of lime in an alcohol flame and directed a jet of oxygen through the flame upon the lime. He thereby obtained, according to his own description in 1826,
Despite these successes, Drummond believed that the parabolic mirror combined with a more powerful light source provided the best setup for a signal light. In his quest for a brilliant light source, he experimented with phosphorus burning in oxygen and various brilliant pyrotechnic preparations. However, the flames were unstable and generally inappropriate. He then shifted his focus, leading to the development of the lime light. In his first apparatus, he used a small sphere of lime in an alcohol flame and directed a jet of oxygen through the flame onto the lime. He achieved, according to his own description in 1826,
a light so intense that when placed in the focus of a reflector the eye could with difficulty support its splendor, even at a distance of forty feet, the contour being lost in the brilliancy of the radiation.
a light so bright that when it was pointed into a reflector, the eye could hardly tolerate its brilliance, even from forty feet away, with the shape vanishing in the stunning glow.
He then continued to experiment with various oxides, including zirconia, magnesia, and lime from chalk and marble. This was the advent of the lime-light, which should bear Drummond's name because it was one of the greatest steps in the evolution of artificial light.
He then kept experimenting with different oxides, like zirconia, magnesia, and lime from chalk and marble. This was the start of the lime-light, which should be named after Drummond because it was one of the biggest advancements in the development of artificial light.
By means of this apparatus in the survey, signals were rendered visible at distances as great as one hundred miles. Drummond proposed the use of this light-source in the important lighthouses at that time and foresaw many other applications. The lime-light eventually was extensively used as a light-signaling device. The heliograph, which utilizes the sun as a light-source, has been widely used as a light-signaling apparatus and Drummond perhaps was the first to utilize artificial light with it. The disadvantage of the heliograph is the undependability of the sun. With the adoption of artificial light, various optical devices have come into use.
Using this equipment in the survey, signals could be seen from as far away as one hundred miles. Drummond suggested using this light source in major lighthouses of that time and anticipated many other uses. The lime-light eventually became widely used as a light-signaling device. The heliograph, which uses the sun as a light source, has been commonly used for light signaling, and Drummond was probably the first to use artificial light with it. The drawback of the heliograph is that it's unreliable because it depends on the sun. With the introduction of artificial light, various optical devices have been developed.
Philip Colomb perhaps is deserving of the credit of initiating modern signaling by flashing a code. He began work on such a system in 1858 and as an officer in the British Navy worked hard to introduce it. Finally, in 1867, the British Navy adopted the flashing-system, in which a light-source is exposed and eclipsed in such a manner as to represent dots and dashes analogous to the Morse code. At first the rate of transmission of words was from seven to ten per minute. Recently much more sensitive apparatus is available, and with such devices the rate is limited only by the sluggishness of the visual process. This initial system was very successful in the British Navy and it was soon found that a fleet could be handled with ease and safety in darkness or in fog. Inasmuch as the "dot-and-dash" system requires only two elements, it may be transmitted by various means. A lantern may be swung in short and long arcs or dipped accordingly.
Philip Colomb probably deserves credit for starting modern signaling by flashing a code. He began working on this system in 1858 and, as an officer in the British Navy, put in a lot of effort to introduce it. Ultimately, in 1867, the British Navy adopted the flashing system, where a light source is exposed and covered in a way that represents dots and dashes similar to Morse code. Initially, the word transmission rate was about seven to ten per minute. Nowadays, much more sensitive equipment is available, and with these devices, the rate is limited only by how quickly the human eye can perceive the signals. This original system was very effective in the British Navy, quickly proving that a fleet could be managed safely and easily in darkness or fog. Since the "dot-and-dash" system only requires two elements, it can be transmitted through various methods. A lantern can be swung in short and long arcs or dipped accordingly.
The blinker or pulsating light-signal consists of a single light-source mechanically occulted. It is controlled by means of a telegraph-key and the code may be rapidly transmitted. The search-light affords a means for signaling great distances, even in the daytime. The light is usually mechanically occulted by a quick-acting shutter, but recently another system has been devised. In the latter the light itself is controlled by means of an electrical shunt across the arc. In this manner the light is dimmed by shunting most of the current, thereby producing the same effect as actually eclipsing the light with a mechanical shutter. By means of the search-light signals are usually visible as far as the limitations of the earth's curvature will permit. By directing the beam against a cloud, signals have been observed at a distance of one hundred miles from the search-light despite intervening elevated land or the curvature of the ocean's surface. By means of small search-lights it is easy to send signals ten miles.
The blinker or flashing light-signal consists of a single light source that is mechanically blocked. It is controlled using a telegraph key, allowing the code to be transmitted quickly. The searchlight provides a way to signal over long distances, even during the day. The light is typically blocked by a fast-acting shutter, but a new system has been developed. In this system, the light itself is controlled using an electrical shunt across the arc. This dims the light by diverting most of the current, creating the same effect as blocking the light with a mechanical shutter. Searchlight signals can usually be seen as far as the earth’s curvature allows. By directing the beam at a cloud, signals have been seen up to one hundred miles away from the searchlight, despite raised terrain or the curvature of the ocean’s surface. Small searchlights can easily send signals up to ten miles.
This kind of apparatus has the advantage of being selective; that is, the signals are not visible to persons a few degrees from the direction of the beam. One of the most recent developments has been a special tungsten filament in a gas-filled bulb placed at the focus of a small parabolic mirror. The beam is directed by means of sights and the flashes are obtained by interrupting the current by means of a trigger-switch. The filament is so sensitive that signals may be sent faster than the physiological process of vision will record. With the advent of wireless telegraphy light-signaling for long distances was temporarily eclipsed, but during the recent war it was revived and much development work was prosecuted.
This type of device is advantageous because it’s selective; the signals aren’t visible to people just a few degrees off the direction of the beam. One of the latest advancements is a special tungsten filament inside a gas-filled bulb that’s located at the focus of a small parabolic mirror. The beam is aimed using sights, and the flashes are created by cutting off the current with a trigger switch. The filament is so sensitive that signals can be sent faster than the eye can perceive. When wireless telegraphy emerged, light signaling for long distances took a backseat temporarily, but during the recent war, it made a comeback and saw significant development.
The Ardois system consists of four lamps mounted in a vertical line as high as possible. Each lamp is double, containing a red and a white light, and these lights are controlled from a keyboard. A red light indicates a dot in the Morse code and a white light indicates a dash. The keys are numbered and lettered, so that the system may be operated by any one. Various other systems employing colored lights have been used, but they are necessarily short-range signals. Another example is the semaphore. When used at night, tungsten lamps in reflectors indicate the positions of the arms. The advantage of these signals over the flashing-system is that each signal is complete and easy to follow. The flashing-system is progressive and must be carefully followed in order to obtain the meaning of the dots and dashes.
The Ardois system consists of four lamps stacked vertically as high as possible. Each lamp has two lights, one red and one white, and these lights are controlled from a keyboard. A red light represents a dot in Morse code, while a white light represents a dash. The keys are numbered and lettered, allowing anyone to operate the system. Various other systems that use colored lights have been employed, but they are typically short-range signals. Another example is semaphore. At night, tungsten lamps in reflectors show the positions of the arms. The advantage of these signals over the flashing system is that each signal is complete and easy to follow. The flashing system is progressive and must be closely monitored to understand the meaning of the dots and dashes.
Smaller signal-lamps using acetylene have been employed in the forestry service and in other activities where a portable device is necessary. In one type, a mixture-tank containing calcium carbide and water is of sufficient capacity for three hours of signaling. A small pilot-light is permitted to burn constantly and the flashes are obtained by operating a key which increases the gas-pressure. The light flares as long as the key is depressed. The range of this apparatus is from ten to twenty miles. An electric lamp supplied from a storage battery has been designed for geodetic operations in mountainous districts where it is desired to send signals as far as one hundred miles. Tests show that this device is a hundred and fifty times more powerful than the ordinary acetylene signal-lamp, and it is thought that with this new electric lamp haze and smoke will seldom prevent observations.
Smaller signal lamps using acetylene have been used in forestry services and other activities where a portable device is needed. In one design, a mixture tank containing calcium carbide and water holds enough capacity for three hours of signaling. A small pilot light burns continuously, and the flashes are created by pressing a key that increases the gas pressure. The light flares as long as the key is held down. This device has a range of ten to twenty miles. An electric lamp powered by a storage battery has been developed for geodetic operations in mountainous areas where signals need to be sent up to one hundred miles. Tests indicate that this device is one hundred fifty times more powerful than a typical acetylene signal lamp, and it’s believed that with this new electric lamp, haze and smoke will rarely interfere with observations.
Certain fixed lights are required by law on a vessel at night. When it is under way there must be a white light at the masthead, a starboard green light, a port red light, a white range-light, and a white light at the stern. The masthead light is designed to emit light through a horizontal arc of twenty points of the compass, ten on each side of dead ahead. This light must be visible at a distance of five miles. The port and starboard lights operate through a horizontal arc of twenty points of the compass, the middle of which is dead ahead. They are screened so as not to be visible across the bow and they must be intense enough to be visible two miles ahead. The masthead light is carried on the foremast and the range-light on the mainmast, at an elevation fifteen feet higher than the former. The range-light emits light toward all points of the compass and must be intense enough to be seen at a distance of three miles. The stern light is similar to the masthead, but its light must not be visible forward of the beam. When a vessel is towing another it must display two or three lights in a vertical line with the masthead light and similar to it. The lights are spaced about six feet apart, and two extra ones indicate a short tow and three a long one. A vessel over a hundred and fifty feet long when at anchor is required to display a white light forward and aft, each visible around the entire horizon. These and many other specifications indicate how artificial light informs the mariner and makes for order in shipping. Without artificial light the waterways would be trackless and chaos would reign.
Certain fixed lights are legally required on a vessel at night. When it's underway, there must be a white light at the masthead, a green light on the starboard side, a red light on the port side, a white range light, and a white light at the stern. The masthead light is designed to shine light in a horizontal arc of twenty points of the compass, ten on each side of straight ahead. This light must be visible from five miles away. The port and starboard lights operate through a horizontal arc of twenty points of the compass, centered straight ahead. They are shielded so they aren't visible across the bow and must be bright enough to see two miles ahead. The masthead light is mounted on the foremast, and the range light is on the mainmast, elevated fifteen feet higher than the masthead light. The range light shines light in all directions and must be bright enough to be visible from three miles away. The stern light is similar to the masthead light, but its light should not be visible in front of the beam. When a vessel is towing another, it must show two or three lights in a vertical line with the masthead light, similar to it. The lights are spaced about six feet apart, with two extra lights indicating a short tow and three for a long tow. A vessel longer than one hundred and fifty feet at anchor is required to display a white light at the front and back, each visible all around the horizon. These and many other specifications show how artificial light guides the mariner and maintains order in navigation. Without artificial light, the waterways would be uncharted and chaos would prevail.
The distress signals of a vessel are rockets, but any burning flame also serves if rockets are unavailable. Fireworks were known many centuries ago and doubtless the possibilities of signaling by means of rockets have long been recognized. An early instance of scientific interest in rockets and their usefulness is that of Benjamin Robins in 1749. While he was witnessing a display of fireworks in London it occurred to him that it would be of interest to measure the height to which the rockets ascended and to determine the ranges at which they were visible. His measurements indicated that the rockets ascended usually to a height of 440 yards, but some of them attained altitudes as high as 615 yards. He then had some special ones made and despatched letters to friends in three different localities, at distances as great as 50 miles, asking them to observe at a certain time, when the rockets were to be sent up in the outskirts of London. Some of these rockets rose to altitudes as great as 600 yards and were distinctly seen by observers 38 miles away. Later he made rockets which ascended as high as 1200 yards and concluded that this was a practical means of signaling. Since that time and especially during the recent war, rockets have served well in signaling messages.
The distress signals of a ship are rockets, but any flame can also work if rockets aren’t available. Fireworks have been around for centuries, and the idea of using rockets for signaling has likely been recognized for a long time. An early example of scientific interest in rockets and their usefulness was Benjamin Robins in 1749. While he was watching a fireworks show in London, he thought it would be interesting to measure how high the rockets went and to find out the distances at which they could be seen. His measurements showed that the rockets usually reached heights of 440 yards, but some went as high as 615 yards. He then had some special ones made and sent letters to friends in three different locations, up to 50 miles away, asking them to watch at a specific time when the rockets would be launched just outside London. Some of these rockets reached altitudes of about 600 yards and were clearly seen by observers 38 miles away. Later, he created rockets that climbed as high as 1200 yards and concluded that this was a practical way to signal. Since then, especially during the recent war, rockets have been very effective for sending messages.
The self-propelled rockets have not been altered in essential features since the remote centuries when the Chinese first used them in celebrations. A cylindrical shell is mounted on a wooden stick and when the powder in the shell burns the hot gases are ejected so violently downward that the reaction drives the shell upward. At a certain point in the air, various signals burst forth, which vary in character and color. One of the advantages of the rocket is that it contains within itself the force of propulsion; that is, no gun is necessary to project it. The illuminating compounds and various details are similar to those of the illuminating shells described in another chapter.
The self-propelled rockets haven't changed much in their key features since ancient times when the Chinese first used them in celebrations. A cylindrical shell is attached to a wooden stick, and when the powder in the shell ignites, the hot gases are pushed out so forcefully downward that the reaction propels the shell upward. At a certain height in the air, different signals explode, each varying in type and color. One of the benefits of the rocket is that it has its own propulsion force; that is, no gun is needed to launch it. The lighting compounds and various details are similar to those of the illuminating shells mentioned in another chapter.
At present the rocket is not scientifically designed to obtain the greatest efficiency of propulsion, but its simplicity in this respect is one of its chief advantages. If the self-propelled rocket becomes the projectile of the future, as some have ventured to predict, much consideration must be given to the design of the orifice through which the gases violently escape in order that the best efficiency of propulsion may be attained. There are other details in which improvements may be made. The combustion products of the black powder which are not gaseous equal about one third the weight of the powder. This represents inefficient propulsion. Furthermore, during recent years much information has been gained pertaining to the air-resistance which can be applied to advantage in designing the form of rockets.
Currently, the rocket isn't scientifically designed for maximum propulsion efficiency, but its simplicity is one of its main benefits. If self-propelled rockets become the projectiles of the future, as some have predicted, a lot of attention needs to be given to the design of the opening through which the gases escape violently to achieve better propulsion efficiency. There are other areas where improvements can be made. The non-gaseous combustion byproducts of black powder make up about one-third of its weight . This leads to inefficient propulsion. Additionally, in recent years, we've gained a lot of insights into air resistance that can be utilized in designing the shape of rockets.
Besides the various rockets, signal-lights have been constructed to be fired from guns and pistols. During the recent war the airman in the dark heights used the pistol signal-light effectively for communication. These devices emitted stars either singly or in succession, and the color of these stars as well as their number and sequence gave significance to the signal. Some of these light-signals were provided with parachutes and were long-burning; that is, light was emitted for a minute or two. There are many variations possible and a great many different kinds of light-signals of this character were used. In the front-line trenches and in advances they were used when telephone service was unavailable. The airman directed artillery fire by means of his pistol-light. Rockets brought aid to the foundered ship or to the life-boats. The signal-tube which burned red, green, or white was held in the hand or laid on the ground and it often told its story. For many years such a device dropped from the rear of the railroad train has kept the following train at a safe distance. A device was tried out in the trenches, during the war, which emitted a flame. This could be varied in color to serve as a signal and the apparatus had sufficient capacity for thirty hours' burning. This could also be used as a weapon, or when reduced in intensity it served as a flash-light.
Besides the various rockets, signal lights have been created to be fired from guns and pistols. During the recent war, airmen in the dark skies effectively used pistol signal lights for communication. These devices could emit stars either individually or in a series, and the color, number, and sequence of these stars conveyed important information. Some of these light signals were equipped with parachutes and could burn for a long time; that is, they emitted light for one or two minutes. There are many possible variations, and a wide variety of light signals of this type were used. In the front-line trenches and during advances, they were utilized when telephone service was unavailable. The airman guided artillery fire using his pistol light. Rockets provided assistance to stranded ships or lifeboats. The signal tube, which burned red, green, or white, could be held in hand or placed on the ground, often communicating its message effectively. For many years, such a device dropped from the back of a railroad train has kept the following train at a safe distance. A device was tested in the trenches during the war that emitted a flame. This flame's color could be changed to serve as a signal, and the apparatus had enough power to burn for thirty hours. It could also be used as a weapon, or when adjusted to a lower intensity, it served as a flashlight.
For many years experiments have been made upon the use of the invisible rays which accompany visible rays. The practicability of signaling with invisible rays depends upon producing them efficiently in sufficient quantity and upon separating them from the visible rays which accompany them. Some successful results were obtained with a 6-volt electric lamp possessing a coiled filament at the focus of a lens three inches in diameter and twelve inches in focal length. This gave a very narrow beam visible only in the neighborhood of the observation post to which the signals were directed. The beam was directed by telescopic sights. During the day a deep red filter was placed over the lamp and the light was invisible to an observer unless he was equipped with a similar red screen to eliminate the daylight. It is said that signals were distinguished at a distance of six miles. By night a screen was used which transmitted only the ultraviolet rays, and the observer's telescope was provided with a fluorescent screen in its focal plane. The ultraviolet rays falling upon this screen were transformed into visible rays by the phenomenon of fluorescence. The range of this device was about six miles. For naval convoys lamps are required to radiate toward all points of the compass. For this purpose a quartz mercury-arc which is rich in ultraviolet rays was surrounded with a chimney which transmitted the ultraviolet rays efficiently and absorbed all visible rays excepting violet light. The lamp appeared a deep violet color at close range, but the faintly visible light which it transmitted was not seen at a distance. A distant observer picks up the invisible ultraviolet "light" by means of a special optical device having a fluorescent screen of barium-platino-cyanide. This device had a range of about four miles.
For many years, experiments have been conducted on the use of invisible rays that accompany visible rays. The practicality of signaling with these invisible rays relies on efficiently producing them in sufficient quantity and separating them from the accompanying visible rays. Some successful results were achieved using a 6-volt electric lamp with a coiled filament focused by a lens that is three inches in diameter and twelve inches in focal length. This setup produced a very narrow beam that was only visible near the observation post to which the signals were directed. The beam was aimed using telescopic sights. During the day, a deep red filter was placed over the lamp, making the light invisible to an observer unless they were equipped with a similar red screen to block out the daylight. Reports suggest that signals could be seen from a distance of six miles. At night, a screen that allowed only ultraviolet rays to pass was used, and the observer's telescope was fitted with a fluorescent screen at its focal plane. The ultraviolet rays hitting this screen were converted into visible rays through fluorescence. This device had a range of about six miles. For naval convoys, lamps need to radiate in all directions. For this purpose, a quartz mercury-arc lamp, rich in ultraviolet rays, was encased in a chimney that efficiently transmitted ultraviolet rays while absorbing all visible rays except violet light. The lamp appeared deep violet at close range, but the faintly visible light it emitted could not be seen from a distance. A distant observer detects the invisible ultraviolet "light" using a special optical device with a fluorescent screen made of barium-platino-cyanide. This device had a range of about four miles.
Light-signals are essential for the operation of railways at night and they have been in use for many years. In this field the significance of light-signals is based almost universally on color. The setting of a switch is indicated by the color of the light that it shows. With the introduction of the semaphore system, in which during the day the position of the arm is significant, colored glasses were placed on the opposite end of the arm in such a manner that a certain colored glass would appear before the light-source for a certain position of the arm. A kerosene flame behind a glass lens was the lamp used, and, for example, red meant "Stop," green counseled "Caution," and clear or white indicated "All clear." For many years the kerosene lamp has been used, but recently the electric filament lamp is being installed to some extent for this purpose. In fact, on one railroad at least, tungsten lamps are used for light-signals by day as well as by night. Three signals—red, green, and white—are placed in a vertical line and behind each lens are two lamps, one operating at high efficiency and one at low efficiency to insure against the failure of the signal. The normal daylight range is about three thousand feet and under the worst conditions when opposed to direct sunlight, the range is not less than two thousand feet. It is said that these lights are seen more easily than semaphore arms under all circumstances and that they show two or three times as far as the latter during a snow-storm.
Light signals are crucial for train operations at night and have been used for many years. In this area, the importance of light signals primarily relies on color. The position of a switch is indicated by the color of the light it displays. With the introduction of the semaphore system, where the arm's position is key during the day, colored lenses were placed at the end of the arm so that a specific colored lens would show in front of the light source for a certain arm position. A kerosene flame behind a glass lens was the light used, where, for instance, red meant "Stop," green meant "Caution," and clear or white indicated "All clear." For many years, the kerosene lamp has been standard, but recently, electric filament lamps are being installed to some extent for this purpose. In fact, at least one railroad uses tungsten lamps for light signals both day and night. Three signals—red, green, and white—are arranged in a vertical line, and behind each lens are two lamps, one operating at high efficiency and one at low efficiency to prevent signal failure. The normal visibility range in daylight is about three thousand feet, and even under the worst conditions, like direct sunlight, the range is no less than two thousand feet. It is said that these lights are easier to see than semaphore arms in all conditions and can be seen two to three times farther than the latter during a snowstorm.
The standard colors for light-signals as adopted by the Railway Signal Association are red, yellow, green, blue, purple, and lunar white. These are specified as to the amount of the various spectral colors which they transmit when the light-source is the kerosene flame. Obviously, the colors generally appear different when another illuminant is used. The blue and purple are short-range signals, but the effective range of the best railway signal employing a kerosene flame is only about four miles.
The standard colors for light signals as established by the Railway Signal Association are red, yellow, green, blue, purple, and lunar white. These are defined based on the amount of different spectral colors they emit when the light source is a kerosene flame. Clearly, the colors look different when another light source is used. The blue and purple signals are for short distances, but the effective range of the best railway signal using a kerosene flame is only about four miles.
It has been shown that the visibility of point sources of white light in clear atmosphere, for distances up to a mile at least, is proportional to their candle-power and inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Apparently the luminous intensities of signal-lamps required in clear weather in order that they may be visible must be 0.43 candles for one nautical mile, 1.75 candles for two nautical miles, and 11 candles for five nautical miles. From the data available it appears that a red or a white signal-light will be easily visible at a distance in nautical miles equal to the square root of its candle-power in that direction. The range in nautical miles of a green light apparently is proportional to the cube root of the candle-power. Whether or not these relations between the range in miles and the luminous intensity in candles hold for greater distances than those ordinarily encountered has not been determined, but it is interesting to note that the square root of the luminous intensity of the Navesink Light at the entrance to New York Harbor is about 7000. Could this light be seen at a distance of seven thousand miles through ordinary atmosphere?
It has been demonstrated that the visibility of point sources of white light in a clear atmosphere, for distances up to at least a mile, is proportional to their candle-power and inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Apparently, the luminous intensities of signal lamps needed to be visible in clear weather must be 0.43 candles for one nautical mile, 1.75 candles for two nautical miles, and 11 candles for five nautical miles. Based on the available data, it seems that a red or a white signal light will be easily visible at a distance in nautical miles equal to the square root of its candle power in that direction. The range in nautical miles of a green light appears to be proportional to the cube root of the candle power. It's not yet determined whether these relationships between the range in miles and the luminous intensity in candles hold true for distances greater than those typically encountered, but it's interesting to note that the square root of the luminous intensity of the Navesink Light at the entrance to New York Harbor is about 7000. Could this light be seen at a distance of seven thousand miles through ordinary atmosphere?
The most distinctive colored lights are red, yellow, green, and blue. To these white (clear) and purple have been added for signaling-purposes. Yellow is intense, but it may be confused with "white" or clear. Blue and purple as obtained from the present practicable light-sources are of low intensity. This leaves red, green, and clear as the most generally satisfactory signal-lights.
The most distinct colored lights are red, yellow, green, and blue. Additionally, white (clear) and purple have been included for signaling purposes. Yellow is bright, but it can be mistaken for "white" or clear. The blue and purple produced by current light sources are of low intensity. This leaves red, green, and clear as the most reliable signal lights.
There are numerous other applications, especially indoors. Some of these have been devised for special needs, but there are many others which are general, such as for elevators, telephones, various call systems, and traffic signals. Light has the advantages of being silent and controllable as to position and direction, and of being a visible signal at night. Thus, in another field artificial light has responded to the demands of civilization.
There are many other uses, especially indoors. Some of these are designed for specific needs, but there are many more that are general, like for elevators, telephones, different calling systems, and traffic lights. Light has the benefits of being silent and easily directed, plus it serves as a visible signal at night. So, in another area, artificial light has met the needs of modern society.
XVI
THE COST OF LIGHT
Artificial light is so superior to natural light in many respects that mankind has acquired the habit of retiring many hours after darkness has fallen, a result of which has brought forth the issue known as "daylight saving." Doubtless, daylight should be used whenever possible, but there are two sides to the question. In the first place, it costs something to bring daylight indoors. The architectural construction of windows and skylights increases the cost of daylight. Light-courts, by sacrificing valuable floor-area, add to the expense. The maintenance of windows and sky lights is an appreciable item. Considering these and other factors, it can be seen that daylight indoors is expensive; and as it is also undependable, a supplementary system of artificial lighting is generally necessary. In fact, it is easy to show in some cases that artificial lighting is cheaper than natural lighting.
Artificial light is so much better than natural light in many ways that people have gotten used to staying up long after it gets dark, leading to the issue of "daylight saving." Sure, we should use daylight whenever we can, but there are two sides to this debate. First, it costs money to bring daylight inside. Building windows and skylights increases the expense of getting daylight. Also, light courts take up valuable floor space, which adds to the cost. The upkeep of windows and skylights is another significant expense. Considering these and other factors, it becomes clear that having daylight indoors can be costly; and since it's also unreliable, an additional system of artificial lighting is usually necessary. In fact, in some situations, it's easy to demonstrate that artificial lighting is cheaper than natural lighting.
The average middle-class home is now lighted artificially for about $15.00 to $25.00 per year, with convenient light-sources which are available at all times. There is no item in the household budget which returns as much satisfaction, comfort, and happiness in proportion to its cost as artificial light. It is an artistic medium of great potentiality, and light in a narrow utilitarian sense is always a by-product of artistic lighting. The insignificant cost of modern lighting may be emphasized in many ways. The interest on the investment in a picture or a vase which cost $25.00 will usually cover the cost of operating any decorative lamp in the home. A great proportion of the investment in personal property in a home is chargeable to an attempt to beautify the surroundings. The interest on only a small portion of this investment will pay for artistic and utilitarian artificial lighting in the home. The cost of washing the windows of the average house may be as great as the cost of artificial lighting and is usually at least a large fraction of the latter. It would become monotonous to cite the various examples of the insignificant cost of artificial light and its high return to the user. The example of the home has been chosen because the reader may easily carry the analysis further. The industries where costs are analyzed are now looking upon adequate and proper lighting as an asset which brings in profits by increasing production, by decreasing spoilage, and by decreasing the liability of accidents.
The average middle-class home now uses artificial lighting for about $15.00 to $25.00 a year, with convenient light sources available at all times. There’s no item in the household budget that provides as much satisfaction, comfort, and happiness relative to its cost as artificial light. It’s a highly versatile artistic medium, and light in a strictly practical sense is always a by-product of artistic lighting. The minimal cost of modern lighting can be highlighted in several ways. The interest on an investment in a picture or vase costing $25.00 will typically cover the cost of running any decorative lamp in the home. A significant portion of the investment in personal belongings in a home is aimed at enhancing the aesthetic appeal. The interest on only a small fraction of this investment will cover the cost of artistic and practical artificial lighting in the home. The expense of cleaning the windows of an average house can be as much as the cost of artificial lighting and is usually at least a significant part of it. It would get repetitive to list all the examples of the low cost of artificial light and its high return for the user. The home example has been chosen because the reader can easily extend the analysis. Industries that analyze costs now view adequate and proper lighting as an asset that generates profits by boosting productivity, reducing waste, and lowering accident risk.
Inasmuch as daylight saving became an issue during the recent war and is likely to remain a matter of concern, its history is interesting. One of the outstanding differences between primitive and civilized beings is their hours of activities. The former automatically adjusted themselves to daylight, but as civilization advanced, the span of activities began to extend more and more beyond the coming of darkness. Finally in many activities the work-day was extended to twenty-four hours. There can be no insurmountable objection to working at night with a proper arrangement of the periods of work; in fact, the cost of living would be greatly increased if the overhead charges represented by such items as machinery and buildings were allowed to be carried by the decreased products of a shortened period of production. There cannot be any basic objection to artificial lighting, because most factories, for example, may be better illuminated by artificial than by natural light.
In light of the fact that daylight saving became a topic during the recent war and is likely to continue being a concern, its history is quite interesting. One of the major differences between primitive and civilized beings is their activity hours. Primitive people naturally adjusted to daylight, but as civilization progressed, the hours of activity began to stretch further into the night. Ultimately, in many sectors, the workday was extended to twenty-four hours. There are no significant objections to working at night with a proper arrangement of work periods; in fact, the cost of living would increase significantly if the overhead costs associated with things like machinery and buildings were based on the reduced output from a shorter production time. There is no fundamental objection to using artificial lighting, as most factories, for instance, may actually be better lit with artificial light than with natural light.
Of course, the lag of comfortable temperature behind daylight is responsible to some extent for a natural shifting of the ordinary working-day somewhat behind the sun. The chill of dawn tends to keep mankind in bed and the cheer of artificial light and the period of recreation in the evening tends to keep the civilized races out of bed. There are powerful influences always at work and despite the desirable features of daylight-saving, mankind will always tend to lag. As years go by, doubtless it will be necessary to make the shift again and again. It seems certain that throughout the centuries thoughtful persons have seen the difficulty of rousing man from his warm bed in the early morning and have recognized a simple solution in turning the hands of the clock ahead. Among the earliest advocates of daylight saving during modern times, when it became important enough to be considered as an economic issue, was Benjamin Franklin. In 1784 he wrote a masterful serio-comic essay entitled "An Economical Project" which was published in the Journal of Paris. The article, which appeared in the form of a letter, began thus:
Of course, the delay in reaching a comfortable temperature after sunrise contributes to a natural shift in the typical workday to align more with the sun. The morning chill often keeps people in bed, while the inviting glow of artificial light and evening leisure activities encourage civilized societies to stay awake longer. There are strong factors constantly at play, and despite the benefits of daylight saving, people will always tend to lag behind. As time goes on, it's likely that we'll need to make this change over and over. It’s pretty clear that for centuries, thoughtful individuals have recognized the challenge of getting people out of their warm beds in the early morning and have identified a simple solution in moving the clock forward. One of the earliest proponents of daylight saving in modern times, when it became significant enough to be seen as an economic concern, was Benjamin Franklin. In 1784, he wrote a clever and humorous essay titled "An Economical Project," published in the Journal of Paris. The article, presented as a letter, began like this:
Messieurs: You often entertain us with accounts of new discoveries. Permit me to communicate to the public through your paper one that has lately been made by myself and which I conceive may be of great utility.
Gentlemen: You often share intriguing stories about new discoveries. I’d like to take this chance to share one I recently made that I think could be very helpful to the public through your publication.
I was the other evening in a grand company where the new lamp of Messrs. Quinquet and Lange was introduced and much admired for its splendor; but a general inquiry was made whether the oil it consumed was not in exact proportion to the light it afforded, in which case there would be no saving in the use of it. No one present could satisfy us on that point, which all agreed ought to be known, it being a very desirable thing to lessen, if possible, the expense of lighting our apartments, when every other article of family expense was so much augmented. I was pleased to see this general concern for economy, for I love economy exceedingly.
I attended a large gathering the other night where the new lamp from Quinquet and Lange was unveiled and admired for its brightness. However, people started questioning whether the oil it used was actually proportional to the light it provided; if that were true, we wouldn’t save any money. No one could give us a clear answer, and everyone agreed it was important to know, as it would be great to lower the cost of lighting our homes, especially since every other household expense has increased so much. I was glad to see this common interest in saving money, as I value being economical.
I went home, and to bed, three or four hours after midnight, with my head full of the subject. An accidental sudden noise waked me about 6 in the morning, when I was surprised to find my room filled with light, and I imagined at first that a number of those lamps had been brought into it; but, rubbing my eyes, I perceived the light came in at the windows. I got up and looked out to see what might be the occasion of it, when I saw the sun just rising above the horizon, from whence he poured his rays plentifully into my chamber, my domestic having negligently omitted the preceding evening to close the shutters.
I went home and to bed about three or four hours after midnight, my mind full of thoughts on the matter. A sudden noise woke me up around 6 in the morning, and I was surprised to find my room filled with light. At first, I thought a bunch of lamps had been brought in, but as I rubbed my eyes, I realized the light was coming through the windows. I got up and looked outside to see what was happening, and I saw the sun just rising above the horizon, flooding my room with its rays because my housekeeper had carelessly forgotten to close the shutters the night before.
I looked at my watch, which goes very well, and found that it was but 6 o'clock; and, still thinking it something extraordinary that the sun should rise so early, I looked into the almanac, where I found it to be the hour given for his rising on that day. I looked forward, too, and found he was to rise still earlier every day till toward the end of June, and that at no time in the year he retarded his rising so long as till 8 o'clock.
I checked my watch, which is accurate, and saw that it was only 6 o'clock. Still surprised that the sun rose so early, I looked at the almanac and saw that was the scheduled time for its rise that day. I also looked ahead and noticed it would rise even earlier each day until around the end of June, and at no point in the year would it rise as late as 8 o'clock.
Your readers who, with me, have never seen any signs of sunshine before noon, and seldom regard the astronomical part of the almanac, will be as much astonished as I was when they hear of his rising so early, and especially when I assure them that he gives light as soon as he rises. I am convinced of this. I am certain of my fact. One cannot be more certain of any fact. I saw it with my own eyes. And, having repeated this observation the three following mornings, I found always precisely the same result.
Your readers, who, like me, have never seen any signs of sunshine before noon and rarely pay attention to the astronomical section of the almanac, will be just as surprised as I was to learn about this early rise, especially when I assure them that it gives off light as soon as it appears. I firmly believe this. I am certain of this fact. You can’t be more sure of a fact than I am. I witnessed it with my own eyes. After repeating this observation for the next three mornings, I consistently found the same result.
He then continues in the same vein to show that learned persons did not believe him and to point out the difficulties which the pioneer encounters. He brought out the vital point by showing that if he had not been awakened so early he would have slept six hours longer by the light of the sun and in exchange he would have lived six hours the following night by candle-light. He then mustered "the little arithmetic" he was master of and made some serious computations. He assumed as the basis of his computations that a hundred thousand families lived in Paris and each used a half-pound of candles nightly. He showed that between March 20th and September 20th, 64,000,000 pounds of wax and tallow could be saved, which was equivalent to $18,000,000.
He then goes on to show that educated people didn’t believe him and highlights the challenges that pioneers face. He made an important point by explaining that if he hadn’t been awakened so early, he would have slept six hours longer in the sunlight, and in return, he would have lived six hours the following night by candlelight. He then used "the little math" he knew to make some serious calculations. He based his calculations on the idea that one hundred thousand families lived in Paris, each using half a pound of candles every night. He demonstrated that between March 20th and September 20th, 64,000,000 pounds of wax and tallow could be saved, which was equivalent to $18,000,000.
After these serious computations he amusingly proposed the means for enforcing the daylight saving. Obviously, it was necessary to arouse the sluggards and his proposals included the use of cannons and bells. Besides, he proposed that each family be restricted to one pound of candles per week, that coaches would not be allowed to pass after sunset except those of physicians, etc., and that a tax be placed upon every window which had shutters. His closing paragraph was as follows:
After these serious calculations, he jokingly suggested ways to enforce daylight saving time. Clearly, it was important to wake up the lazy folks, and his ideas included using cannons and bells. Additionally, he proposed that each family should be limited to one pound of candles per week, that carriages would not be allowed to travel after sunset except for those of doctors, and that a tax should be imposed on every window that had shutters. His closing paragraph was as follows:
For the great benefit of this discovery, thus freely communicated and bestowed by me on the public, I demand neither place, pension, exclusive privilege, nor any other regard whatever. I expect only to have the honor of it. And yet I know there are little, envious minds who will, as usual, deny me this and say that my invention was known to the ancients, and perhaps they may bring passages out of the old books in proof of it. I will not dispute with these people that the ancients knew not the sun would rise at certain hours; they possibly had, as we have, almanacs that predicted it; but it does not follow thence that they knew he gave light as soon as he rose. That is what I claim as my discovery. If the ancients knew it, it might have been long since forgotten; for it certainly was unknown to the moderns, at least to the Parisians, which to prove I need use but one plain simple argument. They are as well instructed, judicious and prudent a people as exist anywhere in the world, all professing, like myself, to be lovers of economy, and, for the many heavy taxes required from them by the necessities of the State have surely an abundant reason to be economical. I say it is impossible that so sensible a people, under such circumstances, should have lived so long by the smoky, unwholesome and enormously expensive light of candles, if they had really known that they might have had as much pure light of the sun for nothing.
For the great benefit of this discovery, which I’m sharing openly with the public, I ask for neither a position, payment, exclusive rights, nor any other rewards at all. I only seek recognition. Yet, I know there are small-minded, envious individuals who will, as always, deny me this and claim that my invention was already known to the ancients, likely quoting old texts to support their argument. I won’t argue with these people that the ancients didn’t know the sun would rise at certain times; they probably had almanacs that predicted it just like we do. But that doesn’t mean they understood it would provide light as soon as it rose. That’s what I’m claiming as my discovery. If the ancients knew this, it may have been forgotten over time; because it was certainly unknown to modern people, especially the Parisians. To prove this, I only need to make one simple argument. They are as educated, wise, and sensible a group of people as can be found anywhere in the world, all claiming, like me, to care about saving money. Given the many heavy taxes enforced by the needs of the state, they have plenty of reason to be economical. I argue it’s impossible for such rational people, under these circumstances, to have lived for so long using the smoky, unhealthy, and extremely expensive candlelight if they really knew they could enjoy as much pure sunlight for free.
Franklin's amusing letter had a serious aim, for in 1784 family expenses were much augmented and adequate lighting by means of candles was very costly in those days. However, conditions have changed enormously in the past hundred and thirty-five years. A great proportion of the population lives in the darker cities. The wheels of progress must be kept going continuously in order to curb the cost of living, which is constantly mounting higher owing to the addition of conveniences and luxuries. Furthermore, the cost of light has so diminished that it is not only a minor factor at present but in many cases is actually paying dividends in commerce and industry. It is paying dividends of another kind in the social and educational aspects of the home, library, church, and art museum. Daylight saving has much to commend it, but the cost of daylight and the value of artificial light are important considerations.
Franklin's funny letter had a serious purpose, because in 1784, family expenses were rising significantly and getting enough lighting from candles was really expensive back then. However, things have changed a lot in the past 135 years. A large portion of the population now lives in the darker cities. We need to keep pushing progress forward to manage the increasing cost of living, which keeps going up because of the addition of conveniences and luxuries. Plus, the cost of light has dropped so much that it's not only a small expense now, but in many cases, it actually benefits businesses and industries. It also brings advantages in social and educational aspects of homes, libraries, churches, and art museums. Daylight saving has its benefits, but both the cost of natural light and the value of artificial light are important factors.
The cost of fuels for lighting purposes cannot be thoroughly compared throughout a span of years without regard to the fluctuating purchasing power of money, which would be too involved for consideration here. However, it is interesting to make a brief survey throughout the past century. From 1800 until 1845 whale-oil sold for about $.80 per gallon, but after this period it increased in value, owing apparently to its growing scarcity, until it reached a price of $1.75 per gallon in 1855. Fortunately, petroleum was discovered about this time, so that the oil-lamp did not become a luxury. From 1800 to 1850 tallow-candles sold at approximately 20 cents a pound. There being six candles to the pound, and inasmuch as each candle burned about seven hours, the light from a candle cost about 1/2 cent per hour. From 1850 to 1875 tallow-candles sold at an average price of approximately 25 cents a pound. It may be interesting to know that a large match emits about as much light as a burning candle and a so-called safety match about one third as much.
The cost of fuels for lighting can't be thoroughly compared over the years without considering the changing purchasing power of money, which would be too complex to address here. However, it’s interesting to take a quick look at the past century. From 1800 to 1845, whale oil sold for about $0.80 per gallon, but after that, its price went up due to its increasing scarcity, reaching $1.75 per gallon by 1855. Fortunately, petroleum was discovered around this time, so oil lamps didn’t become a luxury. From 1800 to 1850, tallow candles were sold at roughly 20 cents per pound. Since there were six candles to a pound, and each candle burned for about seven hours, the light from a candle cost about half a cent per hour. From 1850 to 1875, tallow candles averaged about 25 cents per pound. It might be interesting to note that a large match produces about the same amount of light as a burning candle, while a safety match emits about a third of that.
A candle-hour is the total amount of light emitted by a standard candle in one hour, and candle-hours in any case are obtained by multiplying the candle-power of the source by the hours of burning. In a similar manner, lumens output multiplied by hours of operation give the lumen-hours. A standard candle may be considered to emit an amount of light approximately equal to 10 lumens. A wax-candle will emit about as much light as a sperm candle but will consume about 10 per cent. less weight of material. A tallow candle will emit about the same amount of light with a consumption about 50 per cent. greater. The tallow-candle has disappeared from use.
A candle-hour is the total amount of light given off by a standard candle in one hour. You calculate candle-hours by multiplying the candle-power of the light source by the number of hours it burns. Similarly, if you multiply the lumens output by the hours of operation, you get lumen-hours. A standard candle emits about 10 lumens of light. A wax candle produces roughly the same amount of light as a sperm candle but uses about 10 percent less material. A tallow candle gives off a similar amount of light but consumes about 50 percent more material. Tallow candles are no longer in use.
With the appearance of kerosene distilled from petroleum the camphene lamp came into use. The kerosene cost about 80 cents per gallon during the first few years of its introduction. The price of kerosene averaged about 55 cents a gallon between 1865 and 1875. During the next decade it dropped to about 22 cents a gallon and between 1885 and 1895 it sold as low as 13 cents.
With the arrival of kerosene made from petroleum, the camphene lamp started to be used. In the early years after its introduction, kerosene cost around 80 cents per gallon. From 1865 to 1875, the average price for kerosene was about 55 cents per gallon. In the following decade, it fell to around 22 cents per gallon, and between 1885 and 1895, it was as low as 13 cents.
Artificial gas in 1865 sold approximately at $2.50 per thousand cubic feet; between 1875 and 1885 at $2.00; between 1885 and 1895 at $1.50.
Artificial gas in 1865 sold for about $2.50 per thousand cubic feet; between 1875 and 1885 for $2.00; and between 1885 and 1895 for $1.50.
The combined effect of decreasing cost of fuel or electrical energy for light-sources and of the great improvements in light-production gave to the householder, for example, a constantly increasing amount of light for the same expenditure. For example, the family which a century ago spent two or three hours in the light of a single candle now enjoys many times more light in the same room for the same price. It is interesting to trace the influence of this greatly diminishing cost of light in the home. For the sake of simplicity the light of a candle will be retained as the unit and the cost of light for the home will be considered to remain approximately the same throughout the period to be considered. In fact, the amount of money that an average householder spends for lighting has remained fairly constant throughout the past century, but he has enjoyed a longer period of artificial light and a greater amount of light as the years advanced. The following is a table of approximate values which shows the lighting obtainable for $20.00 per year throughout the past century exclusive of electricity:
The combined effect of decreasing costs for fuel or electricity for light sources and significant improvements in light production has given homeowners, for example, an increasing amount of light for the same spending. For instance, the family, who a century ago spent two or three hours using a single candle, now enjoys much more light in the same room for the same price. It's interesting to explore how this drastically decreasing cost of light affects the home. To keep it simple, we'll use candlelight as the standard unit and assume the cost of lighting the home has stayed roughly the same over the period in question. In reality, the amount of money an average homeowner spends on lighting has remained fairly constant over the past century, but they have enjoyed longer periods of artificial light and greater quantities of light as time has gone on. Below is a table of approximate values showing the lighting available for $20.00 per year over the past century, excluding electricity:
Year | Hours per night | Equivalent of light in candles | Candle-hours | |
---|---|---|---|---|
per night | per year | |||
1800 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 5,500 |
1850 | 3 | 8 | 24 | 8,700 |
1860 | 3 | 11 | 33 | 12,000 |
1870 | 3 | 22 | 66 | 24,000 |
1880 | 3.5 | 36 | 126 | 46,000 |
1890 | 4 | 50 | 200 | 73,000 |
1900 | 5 | 154 | 770 | 280,000 |
It is seen from the foregoing that in a century the candle-equivalent obtainable for the same cost to the householder increased at least thirty times, while the hours during which this light is used have nearly doubled. In other words, in the nineteenth century the candle-hours obtainable for $20.00 per year increased about fifty times. Stated in another manner, the cost of light at the end of the century was about one fiftieth that of candle light at the beginning of the century. One authority in computing the expense of lighting to the householder in a large city of this country has stated that
It’s clear from what we’ve discussed that, over the course of a century, the amount of light you could get for the same cost has increased by at least thirty times, while the hours of light used have nearly doubled. In other words, during the nineteenth century, the candle-hours you could buy for $20.00 a year went up by about fifty times. Put another way, by the end of the century, the cost of light was about one-fiftieth of what candlelight cost at the century's start. One expert calculating the lighting expenses for households in a major city in this country has stated that
coincident with an increase of 1700 per cent. in the amount of night lighting of an American family, in average circumstances, using gas for light, there has come a reduction in the cost of the year's lighting of 34 per cent. or approximately $7.50 per year; and that the cost of lighting per unit of light—the candle-hour—is now but 2.8 per cent. of what it was in the first half of the nineteenth century. No other necessity of household use has been so cheapened and improved during the last century.
Along with a 1700 percent rise in nighttime lighting usage by an average American family using gas, there has been a 34 percent drop in annual lighting costs, which equals about $7.50 a year. Furthermore, the cost of lighting per unit of light—the candle-hour—is now only 2.8 percent of what it was in the early nineteenth century. No other essential household item has become as much cheaper and better over the past hundred years.
In general, the light-user has taken advantage of the decrease by increasing the amount of light used and the period during which it is used. In this manner the greatly diminished cost of light has been a marked sociological and economic influence.
In general, the light user has benefited from the decrease by using more light and extending the time it is used. This way, the significantly lower cost of light has had a noticeable impact both socially and economically.
After Murdock made his first installation of gas-lighting in an industrial plant early in the nineteenth century, he published a comparison of the expense of operation with that of candle-lighting. He arrived at the costs of light equivalent to 1000 candle-hours as follows:
After Murdock installed gas lighting in an industrial plant early in the 19th century, he published a comparison of the operational costs with those of candle lighting. He calculated the costs of light equivalent to 1000 candle-hours as follows:
1000 candle-hours | |
---|---|
Gas-lighting at a rate of two hours per day | $1.95 |
Gas-lighting at a rate of three hours per day | 1.40 |
Candle-lighting | 6.50 |
It is seen that the longer hours of burning reduce the cost of gas-lighting by reducing the percentage of overhead charges. There are no such factors in lighting by candles because the whole "installation" is consumed. This is an early example of which an authentic record is available. At the present time a certain amount of light obtained for $1.00 with efficient tungsten filament lamps, costs $2.00 if obtained from kerosene flames and about $50.00 if obtained by burning candles.
It is observed that longer burning hours lower the cost of gas lighting by decreasing the overhead charges. In candle lighting, there are no such factors because the entire "installation" is used up. This is an early example for which an authentic record exists. Currently, a certain amount of light that costs $1.00 with efficient tungsten filament lamps costs $2.00 when produced by kerosene flames and about $50.00 when generated by burning candles.
In order to obtain the cost of an equivalent amount of light throughout the past century a great many factors must be considered. Obviously, the results obtained by various persons will differ owing to the unavoidable factor of judgment; however, the following list of approximate values will at least indicate the trend of the price of light throughout the century or more of rapid developments in light-production. A fair average of the retail values of fuels and of electrical energy and an average luminous efficiency of the light-sources involved have been used in making the computations. The figures apply particularly to this country.
To determine the cost of an equivalent amount of light over the past century, many factors need to be taken into account. Naturally, the results from different individuals will vary due to the inevitable element of judgment; however, the following list of approximate values will at least show the trend of light prices over the century or more of rapid advancements in light production. A reasonable average of the retail prices of fuels and electrical energy, along with an average luminous efficiency of the light sources involved, has been used for these calculations. The figures specifically apply to this country.
Table Showing the Approximate Total Cost of 1000 Candle-Hours for Various Periods
Table Displaying the Estimated Total Cost of 1000 Candle-Hours for Different Timeframes
In these days the cost of living has claimed considerable attention and it is interesting to compare that of lighting. In the following table the price of food and of electric lighting are compared for twenty years preceding the recent war. The great disturbance due to the war is thereby eliminated from consideration, but it should be noted that since 1914 the price of food has greatly increased but that of electric lighting has not changed materially. The cost of each commodity is taken as one hundred units for the year 1894 but, of course, the actual cost of living for the householder is perhaps a hundred times greater than the cost of electric lighting.
In recent times, the cost of living has gained a lot of attention, and it's interesting to compare it to the cost of lighting. In the table below, we compare the prices of food and electric lighting over the twenty years leading up to the recent war. This helps eliminate the major disruption caused by the war from consideration, but it's important to note that since 1914, the price of food has risen significantly while the price of electric lighting has not changed much. The cost of each item is set at one hundred units for the year 1894; however, the actual cost of living for a household is likely about a hundred times higher than the cost of electric lighting.
Year | Food | Electric lighting |
---|---|---|
1894 | 100 | 100 |
1896 | 80 | 92 |
1898 | 92 | 90 |
1900 | 100 | 85 |
1902 | 113 | 77 |
1904 | 110 | 77 |
1906 | 115 | 57 |
1908 | 128 | 30 |
1910 | 138 | 28 |
1912 | 144 | 23 |
1914 | 145 | 17 |
One feature of electric lighting which puzzles the consumer and which gives the politicians an opportunity for crying "discrimination" and "injustice" at the public-service company is the great variation in rates. There is no discrimination or injustice when the householder, for example, must pay more for his lighting than a factory pays. The rates are not only affected by "demand" but by the period in which the demand comes. Residence lighting is chiefly confined to certain hours from 5 to 9 P. M. and there is a great "peak" of demand at this time. The central-stations must have equipment available for this short-time demand and much of the capacity of the equipment is unused during the remainder of the day. The factory which uses electricity throughout the day or night or both is helping to keep the central-station operating efficiently. The equipment necessary to supply electricity to the factory is operating long hours. Not only is this overhead charge much less for factories and many other consumers than for the householder, but the expense of accounting, of reading meters, etc., is about the same for all classes of consumers. Therefore, this is an appreciable item on the bill of the small consumer.
One aspect of electric lighting that confuses consumers and provides politicians a chance to cry out about "discrimination" and "injustice" against public service companies is the significant variation in rates. There’s no discrimination or injustice when, for instance, a homeowner has to pay more for lighting than a factory does. Rates are influenced not just by "demand" but also by the time when that demand occurs. Residential lighting is mostly limited to certain hours from 5 to 9 PM, creating a major demand peak at that time. Power stations need to have equipment ready for this short peak, and much of that equipment remains idle during the rest of the day. A factory that uses electricity throughout the day or night, or both, helps keep the power station running efficiently. The equipment required to supply electricity to the factory operates for long hours. Not only is this overhead cost much lower for factories and many other consumers compared to homeowners, but the costs associated with accounting, meter reading, and so on are about the same for all types of consumers. As a result, this becomes a noticeable charge for the small consumer.
Doubtless, the public does not realize that the enormous decrease in the cost of lighting during the past century is due largely to the fact that the lighting industry has grown large. Increased production is responsible for some of this decrease and science for much of it. The latter, having been called to the aid of the manufacturers, who are better able by virtue of their magnitude to spend time and resources upon scientific developments, has responded with many improvements which have increased the efficiency of light-production. Some figures of the Census Bureau may be of interest. These are given for 1914 in order that the abnormal conditions due to the recent war may be avoided. The figures pertaining to the manufacture of gas for sale which do not include private plants are as follows for the year 1914 for this country:
Doubtless, the public does not realize that the significant drop in lighting costs over the past century is mainly due to the fact that the lighting inindustry has expanded greatly. Increased production accounts for part of this decrease, while science has contributed much more. Scientists have assisted manufacturers, who, because of their larger scale, are better positioned to invest time and resources into scientific advancements, resulting in many improvements that have boosted the efficiency of light production. Some figures from the Census Bureau may be of interest. These are provided for 1914 to avoid the abnormal conditions caused by the recent war. The figures related to the production of gas for sale, excluding private plants, are as follows for the year 1914 for this country:
Of course, only a small fraction of the total gas manufactured is used for lighting.
Of course, only a small portion of the total gas produced is used for lighting.
According to the U. S. Geological Survey, the quantities of gas sold in this country in the year 1917 were as follows:
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the amounts of gas sold in this country in 1917 were as follows:
Coal-gas | 42,927,728,000 | cubic feet |
Water-gas | 153,457,318,000 | " " |
Oil-gas | 14,739,508,000 | " " |
Byproduct gas | 131,026,575,000 | " " |
Natural gas | 795,110,376,000 | " " |
In 1914 there were 38,705,496 barrels (each fifty gallons) of illuminating oils refined in this country and the value was $96,806,452. About half of this quantity was exported. In 1914 the value of all candles manufactured in this country was about $2,000,000, which was about half that of the candles manufactured in 1909 and in 1904. In 1914 the value of the matches manufactured in this country was $12,556,000. This has increased steadily from $429,000 in 1849. In 1914 the glass industries in this country made 7,000,000 lamps, 70,000,000 chimneys, 16,300,000 lantern globes, 24,000,000 shades, globes, and other gas goods. Many millions of other lighting accessories were made, but unfortunately they are not classified.
In 1914, there were 38,705,496 barrels (each fifty gallons) of illuminating oils refined in this country, with a total value of $96,806,452. About half of this amount was exported. In 1914, the value of all candles produced in this country was around $2,000,000, which was about half of what it was in 1909 and 1904. The value of matches made in this country in 1914 was $12,556,000, steadily increasing from $429,000 in 1849. That year, the glass industry manufactured 7,000,000 lamps, 70,000,000 chimneys, 16,300,000 lantern globes, and 24,000,000 shades, globes, and other gas products. Many millions of other lighting accessories were produced, but unfortunately, they aren't categorized.
Some figures pertaining to public electric light and power stations of the United States for the years 1907 and 1917 are as follows:
Some statistics about public electric light and power stations in the United States for the years 1907 and 1917 are as follows:
In general, there is a large increase in the various items during the decade represented. The output of the central stations doubled in the five years from 1907 to 1912, and doubled again in the next five years from 1912 to 1917. Street lamps were not reported in 1907, but in 1912 there were 348,643 arc-lamps served by the public companies. The number of arc-lamps decreased to 256,838 in 1917. On the other hand, there were 681,957 electric filament street lamps served in 1912, which doubled in number to 1,389,382 in 1917. The cost of construction and equipment of these central stations totaled more than $3,000,000,000 in 1917.
In general, there was a significant increase in various items during the decade in question. The output of the central stations doubled in the five years from 1907 to 1912, and then doubled again in the next five years from 1912 to 1917. Street lamps weren't reported in 1907, but by 1912, there were 348,643 arc lamps operated by public companies. The number of arc lamps decreased to 256,838 in 1917. On the flip side, there were 681,957 electric filament street lamps in 1912, which doubled to 1,389,382 by 1917. The total cost for constructing and equipping these central stations exceeded $3,000,000,000 in 1917.
Although there is no immediate prospect of the failure of the coal and oil supplies, exhaustion is surely approaching. And as the supplies of fuel for the production of gas and electricity diminish, the cost of lighting may advance. The total amount of oil available in the known oil-fields of this country at the present time has been estimated by various experts between 5,000,000,000 and 20,000,000,000 barrels, the best estimate being about 7,000,000,000. The annual consumption is now about 400,000,000 barrels. These figures do not take into account the oil which may be distilled from the rich shale deposits. Apparently this source will yield a hundred billion barrels of oil. In a similar manner the coal-supply is diminishing and the consumption is increasing. In 1918 more than a half-billion tons of coal were shipped from the mines. The production of natural gas perhaps has reached its peak, and, owing to its relation to the coal and oil deposits, its supply is limited.
Although there isn't an immediate threat of coal and oil supplies running out, depletion is definitely on the horizon. As the sources of fuel for gas and electricity production decrease, the cost of lighting may rise. Experts currently estimate that the total amount of oil in the known oil fields of this country is between 5,000,000,000 and 20,000,000,000 barrels, with the best estimate being around 7,000,000,000. The annual consumption is now roughly 400,000,000 barrels. These figures don't include the oil that could be extracted from the rich shale deposits, which could potentially yield a hundred billion barrels. Similarly, the coal supply is shrinking while consumption is increasing. In 1918, over half a billion tons of coal were shipped from the mines. The production of natural gas may have peaked, and due to its connection to coal and oil deposits, its supply is limited.
Although only a fraction of the total production of gas, oil, and coal is used in lighting, the limited supply of these products emphasizes the desirability of developing the enormous water-power resources of this country. The present generation will not be hard pressed by the diminution of the supply of gas, oil, and coal, but it can profit by encouraging and even demanding the development of water-power. Furthermore, it is an obligation to succeeding generations to harness the rivers and even the tides and waves in order that the other resources will be conserved as long as possible. Science will continue to produce more efficient light-sources, but the cost of light finally is dependent upon the cost of the energy supplied to these lamps. At the present time water-power is the anchor to the windward.
Although only a small part of the total production of gas, oil, and coal is used for lighting, the limited supply of these resources highlights the importance of developing the vast water-power potential of this country. While current generations won’t be significantly impacted by the decrease in gas, oil, and coal supplies, they can benefit by promoting and even pushing for the development of water-power. Additionally, it’s our responsibility to future generations to harness rivers and even tides and waves to ensure that other resources are preserved for as long as possible. Science will keep producing more efficient light sources, but the ultimate cost of lighting depends on the energy costs for these lamps. Right now, water-power is the reliable option.
XVII
LIGHT AND SAFETY
It is established that outdoors life and property are at night safer under adequate lighting than they are under inadequate lighting. Police departments in the large cities will testify that street-lighting is a powerful ally and that crime is fostered by darkness. But in reckoning the cost of street-lighting to-day how many take into account the value of safety to life and property and the saving occasioned by the reduction in the police-force necessary to patrol the cities and towns? Owing to the necessity of darkening the streets in order to reduce the hazards of air-raids, London experienced a great increase in accidents on the streets, which demonstrated the practical value of street-lighting from the standpoint of accident prevention.
It’s clear that outdoor life and property are much safer at night with proper lighting than without. Police departments in big cities can confirm that street lighting is a strong ally and that crime often flourishes in the dark. But when assessing the cost of street lighting today, how many consider the value of safety for people and property, as well as the savings from needing fewer police officers to patrol cities and towns? Due to the need to darken the streets to mitigate the risks of air raids, London saw a significant rise in street accidents, highlighting the practical benefits of street lighting for preventing accidents.
During the war, when dastardly traitors and agents of the enemy were striking at industry, the value of lighting was further recognized by the industries, with the result that flood-lighting was installed to protect them. By common consent this new phase was termed "protective lighting." Soon after the entrance of this country into the recent war, the U. S. Military Intelligence established a Section of Plant Protection which had thirty-three district offices during the war and gave attention to thirty-five thousand industrial plants engaged in production of war materials. Protective lighting was early recognized by this section as a very potential agency for defense, and extensive use was made of it. For example, Edmund Leigh, chief of the section, in discussing the value of outdoor lighting stated:
During the war, when sneaky traitors and enemy spies were attacking industry, businesses came to appreciate the importance of lighting even more, leading to the installation of floodlights for protection. This new approach was commonly referred to as "protective lighting." Shortly after the U.S. entered the recent war, the U.S. Military Intelligence set up a Plant Protection Section, which had thirty-three district offices during the war and focused on thirty-five thousand industrial plants engaged in producing war materials. This section quickly recognized protective lighting as a highly effective defense measure, and it was used extensively. For instance, Edmund Leigh, the head of the section, emphasized the value of outdoor lighting by stating:
An illustration of our work in this connection is the case of an $80,000,000 powder plant of recent construction. We arranged to have all wires buried. In addition to the ordinary lighting on an adjacent hill there is a large searchlight which will command any part of the buildings and grounds. Every three hundred yards there is a watch-tower with a searchlight on top. These searchlights are for use only in emergency. Each tower has a telephone service, one connected with the other. The men in the towers have a view of the building exteriors, which are all well lighted, and the men in the buildings look across the yard to the lighted fence line and so get a silhouette of persons or objects in between. The most vital parts of the buildings are surrounded by three fences. In the near-by woods the underbrush has been cleared out and destroyed. The trunks and limbs of trees have been whitewashed. No one can walk among these trees or between the trees and the plant without being seen in silhouette.... I say flatly that I know nothing that is so potential for good defense as good illumination and at the same time so little understood.
An example of our work in this context is a recently built $80,000,000 powder plant. We arranged for all the wires to be underground. Besides the regular lighting on a nearby hill, there’s a large searchlight that can illuminate any part of the buildings and grounds. Every three hundred yards, there’s a watchtower with a searchlight on top. These searchlights are intended for emergency use only. Each tower has a phone system that connects them to each other. The guards in the towers can see the building exteriors, which are all well lit, while the people inside the buildings can see across the yard to the lit fence line, allowing them to spot any silhouettes of people or objects in between. The most critical areas of the buildings are surrounded by three fences. In the nearby woods, the underbrush has been cleared away and removed. The trunks and branches of the trees have been painted white. No one can walk among these trees or between the trees and the plant without being seen in silhouette.... I strongly believe that nothing is as effective for good defense as proper lighting, yet it is still so little understood.
Without such protective lighting an army of men would have been required to insure the safety of this one vital plant; still it is obvious that the cost of the protective lighting was an insignificant part of the value of the plant which it insured against damage and destruction.
Without this protective lighting, a large number of people would have been needed to ensure the safety of this crucial facility; however, it's clear that the expense of the protective lighting was a minimal fraction of the plant's overall value, which it helped protect from damage and destruction.
The United States participated for nineteen months in the recent war and during that time about 400,000 casualties were suffered by its forces. This was at the rate of about 250,000 per year, which included casualties in battle, at sea, and from sickness, wounds, and accidents. Every one has felt the magnitude of this rate of casualties because either his home or that of a friend was blighted by one or more of these tragedies in the nineteen months. However, R. E. Simpson of the Travelers Insurance Company has stated that:
The United States was involved in the recent war for nineteen months, during which approximately 400,000 casualties were suffered by its forces. This translates to about 250,000 casualties per year, including losses in battle, at sea, and from illness, injuries, and accidents. Everyone has felt the impact of this casualty rate because either their home or that of a friend was touched by one or more of these tragedies during those nineteen months. However, R. E. Simpson of the Travelers Insurance Company has stated that:
During a one-year period in this country the number of accidents due to inadequate or improper lighting exceeds the yearly rate of our war casualties.
In just one year in this country, the number of accidents due to poor or improper lighting exceeds our annual war casualties.
This is a startling comparison, which emphasizes a phase of lighting that has long been recognized by experts but has been generally ignored by the industries and by the public. The condition doubtless is due largely to a lag in the proper utilization of artificial lighting behind the rapid increase in congestion in the industries and in public places.
This is a shocking comparison that highlights a aspect of lighting that experts have recognized for a long time but has generally been overlooked by industries and the public. This situation is likely due to a delay in effectively using artificial lighting, which has not kept up with the rapid increase in congestion in industries and public spaces.
Accident prevention is an important phase of modern life which must receive more attention. From published statistics and conservative estimates it has been concluded that there are approximately 25,000 persons killed or permanently disabled, 500,000 seriously injured, and 1,000,000 slightly injured each year in this country. Translating these figures by means of the accident severity rates, Mr. Simpson has found that there is a total of 180,000,000 days of time lost per year. This is equivalent to the loss of services of 600,000 men for a full year of 300 work-days. This loss is distributed over the entire country and consequently its magnitude is not demonstrated excepting by statistics. Of course, the causes of the accidents are numerous, but, among the means of prevention, proper lighting is important.
Accident prevention is a crucial aspect of modern life that needs more focus. According to published statistics and conservative estimates, about 25,000 people are killed or permanently disabled, 500,000 are seriously injured, and 1,000,000 are slightly injured every year in this country. By using accident severity rates, Mr. Simpson has calculated that there are about 180,000,000 days of lost time annually. This is equivalent to losing the services of 600,000 workers for a full year of 300 workdays. This loss is spread all over the country, so its scale isn't fully realized except through statistics. There are many causes of these accidents, but among prevention strategies, good lighting is essential.
According to some authorities at least 18 per cent. of these accidents are due to defects in lighting. On this basis the services of 108,000 men as producers and wage-earners are continually lost at the present time because the lighting is not sufficient or proper for the safety of workers. If the full year's labor of 108,000 men could be applied to the mining of coal, 130,000,000 million tons of coal would be added to the yearly output; and only 10,000 tons would be necessary to supply adequate lighting for this army of men working for a full year for ten hours each day.
According to some experts, at least 18 percent of these accidents are caused by poor lighting. Because of this, the work of 108,000 men as producers and wage earners is lost every day due to inadequate or unsafe lighting for workers. If we could utilize the full year’s work of 108,000 men for coal mining, we could increase the yearly output by 130 million tons of coal, and only 10,000 tons would be needed to provide proper lighting for this large group of workers putting in full days for a whole year.
Statistics obtained under the British workmen's compensation system show that 25 per cent. of the accidents were caused by inadequate lighting of industrial plants.
Statistics obtained under the British workers' compensation system show that 25 percent of the accidents were caused by insufficient lighting in industrial facilities.
Much has been said and actually done regarding the saving of fuel by curtailing lighting, but the saving may easily be converted into a great loss. For example, a 25-watt electric lamp may be operated ten hours a day for a whole year at the expense of one eighth of a ton of coal. Suppose this lamp to be over a stairway or at any vital point and that by extinguishing it there occurs a single accident which involves the loss of only one day's work on the part of the worker. If this one day's time could have produced coal, there would have been enough coal mined in the ten hours to operate the lamp for thirty-two years. The insignificant cost of lighting is also shown by the distribution of the consumption of fuel for heating, cooking, and lighting in the home. Of the total amount of fuel consumed in the home for these purposes, 87 per cent. is for heating, 11 per cent. for cooking and 2 per cent. for lighting. The amount of coal used for lighting purposes in general is about 2.5 per cent. of the total consumption of coal, so it is seen that the curtailment of lighting at best cannot save much fuel; and it may actually result in a great economic loss. By replacing inefficient lamps and accessories with efficient lighting-equipment and by washing windows and artificial lighting devices, a real saving can be realized.
A lot has been said and done about saving fuel by reducing lighting, but this saving can quickly turn into a major loss. For instance, a 25-watt light bulb can run for ten hours a day for a whole year using just one-eighth of a ton of coal. Imagine if this bulb is positioned over a staircase or another critical spot, and turning it off leads to an accident that results in a worker losing just one day's worth of work. If that day’s work could have produced coal, enough coal would have been mined in those ten hours to power the light for thirty-two years. The trivial cost of lighting is further illustrated by how fuel is distributed among heating, cooking, and lighting in homes. Of the total fuel consumed in households for these purposes, 87% is used for heating, 11% for cooking, and only 2% for lighting. The coal used for lighting generally accounts for about 2.5% of total coal consumption, making it clear that cutting back on lighting won't save much fuel and could actually lead to significant economic losses. By swapping out inefficient lamps and fixtures for efficient lighting equipment, and by cleaning windows and lighting devices, real savings can be achieved.
Improper lighting may be as productive of accidents as inadequate lighting, and throughout the industries and upon the streets the misuse of light is in evidence. The blinding effect of a brilliant light-source is easily proved by looking at the sun. After a few moments great discomfort is experienced, and on looking away from this brilliant source the eyes are temporarily blinded by the after-images. When this happens in a factory as the result of gazing into an unshielded light-source, the workman may be injured by moving machinery, by stumbling over objects, and in many other ways. Unshaded light-sources are too prevalent in the industries. Improper lighting is likely to cause deep shadows wherein many dangers may be hidden. On the street the glare from automobile head-lamps is very prevalent and nearly everybody may testify from experience to the dangers of glare. Even the glaring locomotive head-lamp has been responsible for many casualties.
Improper lighting can cause accidents just as much as inadequate lighting, and there's plenty of evidence of light misuse in industries and on the streets. The blinding effect of a bright light source is easy to prove by looking at the sun. After a few moments, it becomes very uncomfortable, and when looking away from this intense source, your eyes are temporarily blinded by after-images. In a factory, if someone stares at an unshielded light source, they may get injured by moving machinery, trip over objects, and face many other hazards. Unshaded light sources are too common in industries. Poor lighting can create deep shadows where many dangers can hide. On the street, the glare from car headlights is widespread, and almost everyone can share stories about the dangers of glare from their own experiences. Even the bright headlights of locomotives have caused many accidents.
Unfortunately, natural lighting outdoors has not been under the control of man and he has accepted it as it is. The sky is a harmless source of light when viewed outdoors and the sun is in such a position that it is usually easy to avoid looking at it. It is so intensely glaring that man unconsciously avoids looking directly at it. These conditions are responsible to an extent for man's indifference and even ignorance of the rudiments of safe lighting. When he has artificial light, over which he may exercise control, he either ignores it or owing to the less striking glare he misuses it and his eyesight without realizing it. A great deal of eye-strain and permanent eye trouble arises from the abuse of the eyes by improper lighting. For example, near-sightedness is often due to inadequate illumination, which makes it necessary for the eyes to be near the work or the reading-page. Improper or inadequate lighting especially influences eyes that are immature in growth and in function, and it has been shown that with improvements in lighting the percentage of short-sightedness has decreased in the schools. Furthermore, it has been shown that where no particular attention has been given to lighting and vision, the percentage of short-sightedness has increased with the grade. There are twenty million school children in this country whose future eyesight is in the hands of those who have jurisdiction over lighting and vision. There are more than a hundred million persons in this country whose eyes are daily subjected to improper lighting-conditions, either through their own indifference or through the negligence of others.
Unfortunately, natural outdoor lighting isn't something people can control, and they've accepted it as it is. The sky provides a harmless light when you're outside, and the sun is usually positioned so that it's easy to avoid looking directly at it. It's so blindingly bright that people instinctively look away. These factors contribute to people's indifference and even ignorance about the basics of proper lighting. When it comes to artificial light, which they can control, they either ignore it or, because the glare isn’t as intense, they misuse it and harm their eyesight without even realizing it. A lot of eye strain and permanent vision issues stem from abusing the eyes with poor lighting. For example, nearsightedness is often caused by insufficient light, forcing the eyes to get too close to their work or reading material. Poor or inadequate lighting particularly affects eyes that are still developing and functioning, and studies have shown that improving lighting reduces the percentage of nearsightedness in schools. Moreover, where lighting and vision haven't been prioritized, the rate of nearsightedness tends to increase with each grade. There are twenty million school children in this country whose future eyesight depends on those responsible for lighting and vision. Additionally, over a hundred million people in this country are exposed to inadequate lighting conditions every day, either due to their own disregard or the negligence of others.
Of a certain group of 91,000 purely industrial accidents in the year 1910, Mr. Simpson has stated that 23.8 per cent. were due, directly or indirectly, to the lack of proper illumination. These may be further divided into two approximately equal groups, one of which comprises the accidents due to inadequate illumination and the other to those toward which improper lighting was a contributing cause. The seasonal variation of these accidents is given in the following table, both for those due directly or indirectly to inadequate and improper lighting and those due to other causes.
Out of a certain group of 91,000 purely industrial accidents in the year 1910, Mr. Simpson noted that 23.8 percent were caused, either directly or indirectly, by inadequate lighting. These can be split into two roughly equal groups: one group includes accidents caused by insufficient lighting, while the other involves accidents where improper lighting was a contributing factor. The seasonal variation of these accidents is shown in the following table, for both those caused directly or indirectly by insufficient and improper lighting and those caused by other factors.
Seasonal Distribution of Industrial Accidents Due to Lighting Conditions and to Other Causes
Seasonal Trends of Industrial Accidents Caused by Lighting and Other Factors
Percentage due to | ||
---|---|---|
Lighting conditions | Other causes | |
July | 4.8 | 5.9 |
August | 5.2 | 6.2 |
September | 6.1 | 6.9 |
October | 8.6 | 8.5 |
November | 10.9 | 10.5 |
December | 15.6 | 12.2 |
January | 16.1 | 11.9 |
February | 10.0 | 10.5 |
March | 7.6 | 8.8 |
April | 6.1 | 6.9 |
May | 5.2 | 5.8 |
June | 3.8 | 5.9 |
The figures in one column have no direct relation to those in the other; that is, each column must be considered by itself. It is seen from the foregoing that about half the number of the accidents due to poor illumination occurred in the months of November, December, January, and February. These are the months of inadequate illumination unless artificial lighting has been given special attention. The same general type of seasonal distribution of accidents due to other causes is seen to exist but not so prominently. The greatest monthly rate of accidents during the winter season is nearly four times the minimum monthly rate during the summer for those accidents due to lighting conditions. This ratio reduces to about twice in the case of accidents due to other causes. Looking at the data from another angle, it may be considered that the likelihood of an accident being caused by lighting conditions is about twice as great in any of the four "winter" months as in any of the remaining eight months. Doubtless, this may be explained largely upon the basis of morale. The winter months are more dreary than those of summer and the workman's general outlook is different in winter than in summer. In the former season he goes back and forth to work in the dark, or at best, in the cold twilight. He is not only more depressed but he is clumsier in his heavier clothing. If the enervating influence of these factors is combined with a greater clumsiness due to cold and perhaps to colds, it is not difficult to account for this type of seasonal distribution of accidents. A study of the accidents of 1917 indicated that 13 per cent. occurred between 5 and 6 P. M. when artificial lighting is generally in use to help out the failing daylight. Only 7.3 per cent. occurred between 12 M. and 1 P. M.
The numbers in one column aren't directly related to those in the other; each column should be looked at on its own. From the earlier discussion, it's clear that about half of the accidents caused by poor lighting happened in November, December, January, and February. These months typically have insufficient lighting unless extra attention has been given to artificial lighting. A similar seasonal pattern of accidents from other causes is also present, but not as obvious. The highest monthly accident rate during winter is nearly four times the lowest monthly rate in summer for incidents related to lighting conditions. For accidents from other causes, this ratio drops to about two times. Looking at the data differently, the chances of an accident due to lighting conditions are about twice as high in any of the four "winter" months compared to the other eight months. This can likely be explained by morale. The winter months are gloomier than summer, and a worker's mindset in winter differs from that in summer. During winter, they travel to and from work in the dark or, at best, in the cold twilight. This not only makes them feel more down but also makes them less coordinated in their thicker clothing. When these draining factors are combined with increased clumsiness from the cold, and perhaps colds themselves, it’s easy to see why this seasonal distribution of accidents occurs. A study of the accidents in 1917 showed that 13 percent occurred between 5 and 6 P. M. when artificial lighting is typically used to supplement fading daylight. In contrast, only 7.3 percent occurred between 12 M. and 1 P. M.
There is another aspect of the subject which deals particularly with the safety of the light-source or method of lighting. As each innovation in lighting appeared during the past century there immediately arose the question of safety. The fire-hazard of open flames received attention in early days, and when gas-lighting appeared it was condemned as a poison and an explosive. Mineral-oil lamps introduced the danger of explosions of the vapors produced by evaporation. When electric lighting appeared it was investigated thoroughly. The result of all this has been an effort to make lamps and methods safe. Insurance companies have the relative safety of these systems established to their satisfaction and to-day little fire-hazard is attached to the present modes of general lighting if proper precautions have been taken.
There’s another aspect of the topic that focuses specifically on the safety of the light source or method of lighting. With each new lighting innovation that emerged over the past century, the question of safety quickly came up. The fire hazards associated with open flames were a concern in the early days, and when gas lighting was introduced, it was criticized as being both poisonous and explosive. Mineral-oil lamps brought the risk of vapor explosions due to evaporation. When electric lighting was developed, it underwent thorough investigation. All of these efforts have aimed to ensure that lamps and methods are safe. Insurance companies have established the relative safety of these systems to their satisfaction, and today, there is little fire hazard associated with current general lighting methods if proper precautions are taken.

UNSAFE, UNPRODUCTIVE LIGHTING WORTHY OF THE DARK AGES
UNSAFE, UNPRODUCTIVE LIGHTING THAT BELONGS IN THE DARK AGES

THE SAME FACTORY MADE SAFE, CHEERFUL, AND MORE PRODUCTIVE BY MODERN LIGHTING
THE SAME FACTORY MADE SAFE, CHEERFUL, AND MORE PRODUCTIVE BY MODERN LIGHTING
When electric lighting was first introduced the public looked upon electricity as dangerous and naturally many questions pertaining to hazards arose. The distribution of electricity has been so highly perfected that little is heard of the hazards which were so magnified in the early years. Data gathered between 1884 and 1889 showed that about 13,000 fires took place in a certain district. Of these, 42 were attributed to electric wires; 22 times as many to breakage and explosion of kerosene lamps; and ten times as many through carelessness with matches. These figures cannot be taken at their face value because of the absence of data showing the relative amount of electric and kerosene lighting; nevertheless they are interesting because they represent the early period.
When electric lighting was first introduced, people saw electricity as dangerous, and many questions about its risks came up. The way electricity is distributed has improved so much that we seldom hear about the dangers that were exaggerated in the early days. Data collected between 1884 and 1889 indicated that around 13,000 fires occurred in a specific area. Out of those, 42 were linked to electric wires; there were 22 times as many caused by the breakage and explosion of kerosene lamps; and ten times as many due to careless use of matches. These numbers shouldn’t be taken at face value since there's no data showing the relative use of electric versus kerosene lighting. However, they are intriguing as they reflect that early period.
There are industries where unusual care must be exercised in regard to the lighting. In certain chemical industries no lamps are used excepting the incandescent lamp and this is enclosed in an air-tight glass globe. Even a public-service gas company cautions its employees and patrons thus: "Do not look for a gas-leak with a naked light! Use electric light." The coal-mine offers an interesting example of the precautions necessary because the same type of problems are found in it as in industries in general, with the additional difficulties attending the presence or possible presence of explosive gas. The surroundings in a coal-mine reflect a small percentage of the light, so that much light is wasted unless the walls are whitewashed. This is a practical method for increasing safety in coal-mines. However, the most dangerous feature is the light-source itself. According to the Bureau of Mines during the years 1916 and 1917 about 60 per cent. of the fatalities due to gas and coal-dust explosions were directly traceable to the use of defective safety lamps and to open flames.
There are industries where great care must be taken regarding lighting. In some chemical industries, only incandescent lamps are allowed, and these are enclosed in airtight glass globes. Even a public gas company warns its employees and customers: "Do not search for a gas leak with an open flame! Use electric lighting." The coal mine is a notable example of the precautions needed because it encounters similar issues as other industries, along with the added challenges of potentially explosive gases. The surfaces in a coal mine reflect very little light, so a lot of light is wasted unless the walls are whitewashed. This is a practical approach to enhancing safety in coal mines. However, the most dangerous aspect is the light source itself. According to the Bureau of Mines, between 1916 and 1917, about 60 percent of the fatalities from gas and coal-dust explosions were directly linked to the use of faulty safety lamps and open flames.
In the early days of coal-mining it was found that the flame of a candle occasionally caused explosions in the mines. It was also found that sparks of flint and steel would not readily ignite the gas or coal-dust and this primitive device was used as a light-source. Of course, statistics are unavailable concerning the casualties in coal-mines throughout the past centuries, but with the accidents not uncommon in this scientific age, with its elaborate organizations striving to stamp out such casualties, there is good reason to believe that previous to a century or two ago the risks of coal-mining must have been great. Open flames have been widely used in this industry, but there has always been the risk of the presence or the appearance of gas or explosive dust.
In the early days of coal mining, it was discovered that candle flames sometimes caused explosions in the mines. It was also found that sparks from flint and steel wouldn't easily ignite gas or coal dust, and this basic device was used as a light source. Of course, we don’t have statistics on coal mine casualties from past centuries, but considering the accidents that still happen today, despite advanced organizations working to eliminate such incidents, it's reasonable to believe that the dangers of coal mining were significant a century or two ago. Open flames have been commonly used in this industry, but there has always been the risk of gas or explosive dust being present or appearing.
The early open-flame lamps not only were sources of danger but their feeble varying intensity caused serious damage to the eyesight of miners. This factor is always present in inadequate and improper lighting, but its influence is noticeable in coal-mining in the nervous disease affecting the eyes which is known as nystagmus. The symptoms of the disease are inability to see at night and the dazzling effect of ordinary lamps. Finally objects appear to the sufferer to dance about and his vision is generally very much disturbed.
The early open-flame lamps were not just a safety hazard; their weak and inconsistent brightness seriously harmed the eyesight of miners. This issue is common with poor lighting, but its effects are particularly evident in coal mining, where it contributes to a nervous condition affecting the eyes called nystagmus. Symptoms of this disease include difficulty seeing at night and being blinded by regular lamps. Ultimately, objects seem to dance around for the person affected, leading to significant vision disturbances.
The oil-lamps used in coal-mining have a luminous intensity equivalent to about one to four candles, but owing to the atmospheric conditions in the mines a flame does not burn as brightly as in the fresh air. The possibility of explosion due to the open flame was eliminated by surrounding it with a metal gauze. Davy was the inventor of this device and his safety lamp introduced about a hundred years ago has been a boon to the coal-miner. Various improvements have been devised, but Davy's lamp contained the essentials of a safety device. The flame is surrounded by a cylinder of metal gauze which by forming a much cooler boundary prevents the mine-gas from becoming heated locally by the lamp flame to a sufficient temperature to ignite and consequently to explode. This device not only keeps the flame from igniting the gas but it also serves as an indicator of the amount of gas present, by the variation in the size and appearance of the tip of the flame. However, the gauze reduces the luminous output, and as it accumulates soot and dust the light is greatly diminished. One of these lamps is about as luminous as a candle, initially, but its intensity is often reduced by accumulations upon the gauze to only one fifth of the initial value.
The oil lamps used in coal mining have a brightness similar to about one to four candles, but because of the air conditions in the mines, the flame doesn't burn as brightly as it does in fresh air. The risk of explosion from the open flame was reduced by surrounding it with a metal mesh. Davy invented this device, and his safety lamp, introduced about a hundred years ago, has been a great help to coal miners. Various improvements have been made, but Davy's lamp included the key features of a safety device. The flame is enclosed in a metal mesh cylinder, which creates a much cooler barrier that prevents the mine gas from getting hot enough to ignite and explode due to the lamp's flame. This device not only keeps the flame from igniting the gas but also indicates the amount of gas present by the changes in size and appearance of the flame tip. However, the mesh reduces the brightness, and as it collects soot and dust, the light is significantly diminished. One of these lamps starts off about as bright as a candle, but its intensity can often drop to just one fifth of that initial value due to the buildup on the mesh.
The acetylene lamp is the best open-flame light-source available to the miner, for several reasons. It is of a higher candle-power than the others and as it is a burning gas, there is not the danger of flying sparks as in the case of burning wicks. The greater intensity of illumination affords a greater safety to the miner by enabling him to detect loose rock which may be ready to fall upon him. However, this lamp may be a source of danger, owing to the fact that it will burn more brilliantly in a vitiated atmosphere than other flame-lamps. Another disadvantage is the possibility of calcium carbide accidentally spilt coming in contact with water and thereby causing the generation of acetylene gas. If this is produced in the mine in sufficient quantities it is a danger which may not be suspected. If ignited it will explode and may also cause severe burns.
The acetylene lamp is the best open-flame light source for miners for several reasons. It has a higher candlepower than others, and because it burns gas, there’s less risk of flying sparks compared to burning wicks. The increased brightness makes it safer for miners, allowing them to spot loose rock that could fall. However, this lamp can also be dangerous since it burns more brightly in a contaminated atmosphere than other flame lamps. Another drawback is that if calcium carbide spills and comes into contact with water, it can produce acetylene gas. If this gas builds up in the mine, it poses a danger that might not be obvious. If ignited, it can explode and cause serious burns.
The electric lamp, being an enclosed light-source capable of being subdivided and fed by a small portable battery, early gave promise of solving the problem of a safe mine-lamp of adequate candle-power. Much ingenuity has been applied to the development of a portable electric safety mine-lamp, and several such lamps are now approved by the Bureau of Mines. Two general types are being manufactured, the cap outfit and the hand outfit. They consist essentially of a lamp in a reflector whose aperture is closed with a sheet or a lens of clear glass. The battery may be of the "dry" or "storage" type and in the case of the cap outfit the battery is carried on the back. The specifications for these lamps demand that a luminous intensity averaging at least 0.4 candle be maintained throughout twelve consecutive hours of operation. At no time during this period shall the output of light fall below 1.25 lumens for a cap-lamp and below 3 lumens for a hand-lamp. Inasmuch as these are equipped with reflectors, the specifications insist that a circle of light at least seven feet in diameter shall be cast on a wall twenty inches away. It appears that a portable lamp is an economic necessity in the coal-mines, on account of the expense, inconvenience, and possible dangers introduced by distribution systems such as are used in most places.
The electric lamp, being a closed light source that can be powered by a small portable battery, promised early on to solve the issue of a safe mine lamp with enough brightness. A lot of creativity has gone into developing a portable electric safety mine lamp, and several are now approved by the Bureau of Mines. Two main types are being produced: the cap outfit and the hand outfit. They mainly consist of a lamp in a reflector with an opening covered by a sheet or a clear glass lens. The battery can be either a "dry" or "storage" type, and for the cap outfit, the battery is worn on the back. The requirements for these lamps state that they must maintain an average luminous intensity of at least 0.4 candles for twelve continuous hours of use. At no point during this time should the light output drop below 1.25 lumens for a cap lamp and below 3 lumens for a hand lamp. Because these lamps come with reflectors, the standards require that they project a circle of light at least seven feet in diameter on a wall twenty inches away. It seems that a portable lamp is economically necessary in coal mines due to the costs, inconveniences, and potential dangers posed by distribution systems commonly used elsewhere.
Although the major defects in lighting are due to absence of light in dangerous places, to glare, and to other factors of improper lighting, there are many minor details which may contribute to safety. For example, low lamps are useful in making steps in theaters and in other places, in drawing attention to entrances of elevators, in lighting the aisles of Pullman cars, under hand-rails on stairways, and in many other vital places. A study of accidents indicates that simple expedients are effective preventives.
Although the main issues with lighting come from not having enough light in dangerous areas, glare, and other poor lighting conditions, there are plenty of smaller details that can help with safety. For instance, low lamps are great for highlighting steps in theaters and other locations, drawing attention to elevator entrances, lighting up the aisles of Pullman cars, under handrails on stairways, and in many other important spots. Research on accidents shows that straightforward solutions can be effective in preventing them.
XVIII
THE COST OF LIVING
A comparison of the civilization of the present with that of a century ago reveals a startling difference in the standards of living. To-day mankind enjoys conveniences and luxuries that were undreamed of by the past generations. For example, a certain town in Iowa, a score of years ago, was appraised for a bond-issue and it was necessary to extend its limits considerably in order to include a valuation of one half million dollars required by the underwriters. On a summer's evening at the present time a thousand "pleasure" automobiles may be found parked along its streets and these exceed in valuation that of the entire town only twenty years ago and equal it to-day. There are economists who would argue that the automobile has paid for itself by its usefulness, but the fact still exists that a great amount of labor has been diverted from producing food, clothing, and fuel to the production of "pleasure" automobiles. And this is the case with many other conveniences and luxuries. It is admitted that mankind deserves these refinements of modern civilization, but he must expect the cost of living to increase unless counteracting measures are taken.
A comparison of today's civilization with that of a century ago shows a shocking difference in living standards. Today, people enjoy conveniences and luxuries that past generations couldn't even imagine. For example, a town in Iowa was assessed for a bond issue twenty years ago, and it had to expand its borders significantly to reach a valuation of half a million dollars needed by the underwriters. Nowadays, on a summer evening, you can find a thousand "pleasure" cars parked along its streets, which are worth more than the entire town was just twenty years ago and are equal to that value today. Some economists might argue that cars have paid for themselves through their usefulness, but the reality is that a significant amount of labor has shifted away from producing food, clothing, and fuel to making "pleasure" cars. This situation applies to many other conveniences and luxuries as well. While it's acknowledged that people deserve these advancements of modern civilization, they should be prepared for rising living costs unless measures are taken to counteract them.
The economics of the increasing cost of living and the analysis of the relations of necessities, conveniences, and luxuries are too complex to be thoroughly discussed here. In fact, the most expert economists would disagree on many points. However, it is certain that the cost of living has steadily increased during the past century and it is reasonably certain that the standards of the present civilization are responsible for some if not all of the increase. Increased production is an anchor to the windward. It may drag and give way to some extent, but it will always oppose the course of the cost of living.
The economics of rising living costs and the study of the relationships between necessities, conveniences, and luxuries are too complicated to be fully discussed here. In fact, even the most knowledgeable economists would disagree on many points. However, it's clear that the cost of living has consistently gone up over the past century, and it's fairly certain that the standards of our current civilization contribute to some, if not all, of that increase. Increased production serves as a strong counterbalance. It might falter and give way to some extent, but it will always push back against the rising cost of living.
When the first industrial plant was lighted by gas, early in the nineteenth century, the aim was merely to reinforce daylight toward the end of the day. Continuous operation of industrial plants was not practised in those days, excepting in a very few cases where it was essential. To-day some industries operate continuously, but most of them do not. In the latter case the consumer pays more for the product because the percentage of fixed or overhead charge is greater. Investment in ground, buildings, and equipment exacts its toll continuously and it is obvious that three successive shifts producing three times as much as a single day shift, or as much as a trebled day shift, will produce the less costly product. In the former case the fixed charge is distributed over the production of continuous operation, but in the latter case the production of a single day shift assumes the entire burden. Of course, there are many factors which enter into such a consideration and an important one is the desirability of working at night. It is not the intention to touch upon the psychological and sociological aspects but merely to look coldly upon the facts pertaining to artificial light and production.
When the first industrial plant was lit by gas in the early nineteenth century, the goal was simply to extend daylight into the evening. Back then, only a few industries operated continuously, and it was mainly when absolutely necessary. Today, some industries run around the clock, but most do not. In the cases where they don't, consumers end up paying more for the product because the fixed costs are spread over less production. Investments in land, buildings, and equipment incur ongoing costs, and it’s clear that three shifts producing three times as much as a single shift, or as much as a triple day shift, would lead to a cheaper product. In continuous operations, the fixed costs are spread out over more production, while a single day shift bears the entire burden. Of course, many factors play into this, including the question of whether working at night is desirable. This analysis doesn’t dive into the psychological and sociological implications; it simply examines the facts related to artificial light and production.
In the first place, it has been proved that in factories proper lighting as obtained by artificial means is generally more satisfactory than the natural lighting. Of course, a narrow building with windows on two sides or a one-story building with a saw-tooth roof of best design may be adequately illuminated by natural light, but these buildings are the exception and they will grow rarer as industrial districts become more congested. Artificial light may be controlled so that light of a satisfactory quality is properly directed and diffused. Sufficient intensities of illumination may be obtained and the failure of artificial light is a remote possibility as compared with the daily failure of natural light. With increasing cost of ground space, factories are built of several stories and with less space given to light courts, with the result that the ratio of window area to that of the floor is reduced. These tendencies militate against satisfactory daylighting. In the smoky congested industrial districts the period of effective daylight is gradually diminishing and artificial lighting is always essential at least as a reinforcement for daylight. It has been proved that proper artificial lighting—and there is no excuse for improper artificial lighting—is superior to most interior daylighting conditions.
First of all, it’s been shown that in factories, having proper artificial lighting is usually more effective than relying on natural light. Sure, a narrow building with windows on two sides or a single-story building with a well-designed saw-tooth roof might get enough natural light, but these cases are rare and will become even less common as industrial areas get denser. Artificial light can be controlled so that it provides good quality illumination that is properly directed and spread out. You can achieve adequate levels of brightness, and the chance of problems with artificial lighting is much less compared to the regular issues with natural light. As land prices go up, factories are being built taller and with less space for light wells, which means the window area compared to the floor space is shrinking. These trends make it harder to get good natural light. In smoky, crowded industrial areas, the time when natural light is effective is getting shorter, so artificial lighting is always necessary at least to supplement the daylight. Research has shown that proper artificial lighting—there’s really no reason for poor artificial lighting—is better than most indoor daylight situations.
Although it is difficult to present figures in a brief discussion of this character, it may be stated that, in general, the cost of adequate artificial light is about 2 per cent. of the pay-roll of the workers; about 10 per cent. of the rental charges; and only a fraction of 1 per cent. of the cost of the manufactured products. These figures vary considerably, but they represent conservative average estimates. From these it is seen that artificial lighting is a small factor in adding to the cost of the product. But does artificial lighting add to the cost of a product? Many examples could be cited to prove that proper artificial lighting may be responsible for an actual reduction in the cost of the product.
Although it's challenging to present statistics in a brief discussion about this topic, it can be said that, in general, the cost of sufficient artificial lighting is about 2 percent of the workers' payroll, around 10 percent of rental expenses, and only a fraction of 1 percent of the cost of manufactured goods. These figures can vary significantly, but they serve as conservative average estimates. From this, it's clear that artificial lighting contributes only a small amount to the overall cost of a product. But does artificial lighting actually increase the cost of a product? There are many examples to demonstrate that proper artificial lighting can lead to a reduction in the overall cost of the product.

BUILDING SHIPS UNDER ARTIFICIAL LIGHT AT HOG ISLAND SHIPYARD
BUILDING SHIPS UNDER ARTIFICIAL LIGHT AT HOG ISLAND SHIPYARD
In a certain plant it was determined that the workmen each lost an appreciable part of an hour per day because of inadequate lighting. A properly designed and maintained lighting-system was installed and the saving in the wages previously lost, more than covered the operating-expense of the artificial lighting. Besides really costing the manufacturer less than nothing, the new artificial lighting system was responsible for better products, decreased spoilage, minimized accidents, and generally elevated spirits of the workmen. In some cases it is only necessary to save one minute per hour per workman to offset entirely the cost of lighting. The foregoing and many other examples illustrate the insignificance of the cost of lighting.
In a specific plant, it was found that workers lost a significant portion of an hour each day due to poor lighting. A well-designed and well-maintained lighting system was put in place, and the savings from the wages previously lost more than covered the operational costs of the artificial lighting. In fact, the new artificial lighting system ended up costing the manufacturer less than nothing, leading to better products, reduced waste, fewer accidents, and improved morale among the workers. In some instances, saving just one minute per hour per worker is enough to completely offset the cost of lighting. The examples above and many others demonstrate how trivial the cost of lighting really is.
The effectiveness of artificial lighting in reducing the cost of living is easily demonstrated by comparing the output of a factory operating on one and two shifts per day respectively. In a well-lighted factory which operated day and night shifts, the cost of adequate lighting was 7 cents per square foot per year. If this factory, operating only in the daytime, were to maintain the same output, it would be necessary to double its size. In order to show the economic value of artificial lighting it is only necessary to compare the cost of lighting with the rental charge of the addition and of its equipment. A fair rental value for plant and equipment is 50 cents per square foot per year; but of course this varies considerably, depending upon the type of plant and the character of the equipment. An investigation showed that this value varies usually between 30 to 70 cents per square foot per year. Using the mean value, 50 cents, it is seen that the rental charge is about seven times the cost of lighting. Furthermore, there is a saving of 43 cents per square foot per year during the night operation by operating the night shift. Of course, this is not strictly true because a depreciation of machinery during the night shift should be allowed for. These fixed charges would average slightly more than half as much in the case of the two-shift factory as in the case of the same output from a factory twice as large but operating only a day shift. Incidentally, the two-shift factory need not be a hardship for the workers, for, if the eight-hour shifts are properly arranged, the worker on the night shift may be in bed by midnight and the objection to a disturbance of ordinary hours of sleep is virtually eliminated.
The effectiveness of artificial lighting in lowering living costs is easily shown by comparing the output of a factory running on one shift versus two shifts a day. In a well-lit factory that operates both day and night shifts, the cost of sufficient lighting is 7 cents per square foot per year. If this same factory were to operate only during the day while keeping the same output, it would need to double its size. To illustrate the economic advantage of artificial lighting, we just need to compare the cost of lighting with the rental cost of the additional space and equipment. A reasonable rental value for the facility and equipment is 50 cents per square foot per year, but this can vary significantly based on the type of plant and the nature of the equipment. Research shows that this value typically ranges from 30 to 70 cents per square foot per year. Using the average value of 50 cents, it’s clear that the rental cost is about seven times the cost of lighting. Additionally, there’s a savings of 43 cents per square foot per year during night operations by using the night shift. However, this isn't entirely accurate because we should account for machinery depreciation during the night shift. These fixed costs would typically be slightly more than half as much for a factory running two shifts compared to a larger factory running only a day shift with the same output. Also, the two-shift factory can be manageable for workers; if the eight-hour shifts are organized properly, a night shift worker can be in bed by midnight, effectively reducing the disruption to their usual sleep schedule.
In a discussion of light and safety presented in another chapter the startling industrial losses due to accidents are shown to be due partially to inadequate or improper lighting. About one fourth of the total number of accidents may be charged to defective lighting. The consumer bears the burden of the support of an unproducing army of idle men. According to some experts an average of about 150,000 men are continuously idle in this country owing to inadequate and improper lighting.
In a discussion about light and safety presented in another chapter, the shocking industrial losses from accidents are shown to be partially caused by insufficient or poor lighting. Around one-fourth of all accidents can be attributed to bad lighting. The consumer ends up supporting an unproductive group of idle workers. According to some experts, about 150,000 people are continuously unemployed in this country due to inadequate and improper lighting.
This is an appreciable factor in the cost of living, but the greatest effectiveness of artificial lighting in curtailing costs is to be found in reducing the fixed charges borne by the product through the operation of two shifts and by directly increasing production owing to improved lighting. The standard of artificial-lighting intensity possessed by the average person at the present time is an inheritance from the past. In those days when artificial light was much more costly than at present the tendency naturally was to use just as little light as necessary. That attitude could not have been severely criticized in those early days of artificial lighting, but it is inexcusable to-day. Eyesight and greater safety from accidents are in themselves valuable enough to warrant adequate lighting, but besides these there is the appeal of increased production.
This is an important factor in the cost of living, but the biggest benefit of artificial lighting in reducing costs comes from lowering fixed charges associated with production through operating two shifts and directly boosting output thanks to better lighting. The level of artificial lighting intensity that the average person has today is a carryover from the past. Back when artificial light was much more expensive than it is now, the natural instinct was to use as little light as possible. That mindset wasn’t really criticized in those early days of artificial lighting, but it’s unacceptable now. Good eyesight and improved safety from accidents are valuable enough on their own to justify proper lighting, not to mention the benefit of increased production.
Outdoors on a clear summer day at noon the intensity of daylight illumination at the earth's surface is about 10,000 foot-candles; in other words, it is equal to the illumination on a surface produced by a light-source equivalent to 10,000 candles at a distance of one foot from the surface. This will be recognized as an enormous intensity of illumination. On a cloudy day the intensity of illumination at the earth's surface may be as high as 3000 foot-candles and on a "gloomy" day the illumination at the earth's surface may be 1000 foot-candles. When it is considered that mankind works under artificial light with an intensity of only a few foot-candles, the marvels of the visual apparatus are apparent. But it should be noted that the eyes of the human race evolved under natural light. They have been used to great intensities when called upon for their greatest efforts. The human being is wonderfully adaptive, but it could scarcely be hoped that the eyes could readjust themselves in a few generations to the changed conditions of low-intensity artificial lighting. There is no complaint against the range of intensities to which the eye responds, for in range of sensibility it is superior to any man-made device.
Outdoors on a clear summer day at noon, the brightness of sunlight at the earth's surface is about 10,000 foot-candles; in other words, it’s like having a light source equivalent to 10,000 candles one foot away from the surface. This is recognized as an extremely high level of brightness. On a cloudy day, the brightness at the earth's surface can reach up to 3,000 foot-candles, and on a "gloomy" day, it might be around 1,000 foot-candles. When you consider that people work under artificial light with an intensity of only a few foot-candles, the capabilities of our eyesight are impressive. However, it’s important to note that human eyes evolved under natural light conditions. They've adapted to high brightness levels when needed. Humans are incredibly adaptable, but it’s unlikely that our eyes could fully adjust to the low levels of artificial light in just a few generations. There’s no complaint about the range of brightness levels our eyes can handle; in terms of sensitivity, they’re better than any man-made device.
For extremely low brightnesses another set of physiological processes come into play. Based purely upon the physiological laws of vision it seems reasonable to conclude that mankind should not work under artificial illumination as low as has been considered necessary owing to the cost in the past. With this principle of vision as a foundation, experiments have been made with greater intensities of illumination in the industries and elsewhere and increased production has been the result. In a test in a factory where an adequate record of production was in effect it was found that an increase in the intensity of illumination from 4 to 12 foot-candles increased the production in various operations. The lowest increase in production was 8 per cent., the highest was 27 per cent., and the average was 15 per cent. The original lighting in this case was better than that of the typical industrial conditions, so that it seems reasonable to expect a greater increase in production when a change is made from the average inadequate lighting of a factory to a well-designed lighting-system giving a high intensity of illumination.
For very low brightness levels, another set of physiological processes kicks in. Based solely on the physiological rules of vision, it seems reasonable to conclude that humans shouldn’t work under artificial lighting as dim as what’s been deemed necessary in the past due to costs. Using this principle of vision as a basis, experiments have been conducted with brighter lighting in various industries, and the results show increased production. In a factory test where production was accurately recorded, raising the brightness from 4 to 12 foot-candles led to increased output across different tasks. The smallest rise in production was 8%, while the highest was 27%, and the average increase was 15%. The original lighting in this instance was better than the typical industrial standard, so it’s reasonable to expect an even greater boost in production when switching from average inadequate factory lighting to a well-designed lighting system that provides high intensity illumination.
In another test the production under a poor system of lighting by means of bare lamps on drop-cords was compared with that of an excellent system in which well-designed reflectors were used. The intensity of illumination in the latter case was twenty-five times that of the former and the production was increased in various operations from 30 per cent. for the least increase to 100 per cent. for the greatest increase. Inasmuch as the energy consumption in the latter case was increased seven times and the illumination twenty-five times, it is seen that the increase in intensity of illumination was due largely to the use of proper reflectors and to the general layout of the new lighting-system.
In another test, production under a poor lighting system using bare bulbs on drop cords was compared to that of an excellent system with well-designed reflectors. The brightness in the latter case was twenty-five times greater than in the former, and production increased by various amounts, from 30 percent for the smallest increase to 100 percent for the largest increase. Since the energy consumption in the latter case increased seven times and the brightness increased twenty-five times, it’s clear that the boost in light intensity was largely due to the use of proper reflectors and the overall design of the new lighting system.
In another case a 10 per cent. increase in production was obtained by increasing the intensity of illumination from 3 foot-candles to about 12 foot-candles. This increase of four times in the intensity of illumination involved an increase in consumption of electrical energy of three times the original amount at an increase in cost equal to 1.2 per cent. of the pay-roll. In another test an increase of 10 per cent. in production was obtained at an increase in cost equal to less than 1 per cent. of the payroll. The efficiency of well-designed lighting installations is illustrated in this case, for the illumination intensity was increased six times by doubling the consumption of electrical energy.
In another case, a 10 percent increase in production was achieved by raising the light intensity from 3 foot-candles to about 12 foot-candles. This fourfold increase in light intensity required three times the original electrical energy consumption, leading to a cost increase of 1.2 percent of the payroll. In another test, a 10 percent boost in production was reached with a cost increase of less than 1 percent of the payroll. The effectiveness of well-designed lighting systems is shown here, as the light intensity was increased six times by simply doubling the electrical energy consumption.
Various other tests could be cited, but these would merely emphasize the same results. However, it may be stated that the factory superintendents involved are convinced that adequate and proper artificial lighting is a great factor in increasing production. Mr. W. A. Durgin, who conducted the tests, has stated that the average result of increasing the intensity of illumination and of properly designing the lighting installations in factories will be at least a 15 per cent. increase in production at an increased cost of not more than 5 per cent. of the pay-roll. This is apparently a conservative statement. When it is considered that generally the cost of lighting is only a fraction of 1 per cent. of the cost of products to the consumer, it is seen that the additional cost of obtaining an increase of 15 per cent. in production is inappreciable.
Various other tests could be mentioned, but they would only highlight the same results. However, it can be stated that the factory managers involved are convinced that proper artificial lighting is a significant factor in boosting production. Mr. W. A. Durgin, who conducted the tests, has stated that on average, increasing the intensity of illumination and properly designing the lighting setups in factories will lead to at least a 15 percent increase in production, with an additional cost of no more than 5 percent of the payroll. This is clearly a conservative estimate. Considering that the cost of lighting is typically only a fraction of 1 percent of the consumer product cost, the extra expense of achieving a 15 percent increase in production is negligible.
Industrial superintendents are just beginning to see the advantage of adequate artificial lighting, but the low standards of lighting which were inaugurated when artificial light was much more costly than it is to-day persist tenaciously. When high intensities of proper illumination are once tried, they invariably prove successful in the industries. Not only does the worker see all his operations better, but there appears to be an enlivening effect upon individuals under the higher intensities of illumination. Mankind chooses a dimly lighted room in which to rest and to dream. A room intensely lighted by means of well-designed units which are not glaring is comfortable but not conducive to quiet contemplation. It is a place in which to be active. This is perhaps one of the factors which makes for increased production under adequate lighting.
Industrial superintendents are just starting to recognize the benefits of proper artificial lighting, but the low lighting standards established when artificial light was much more expensive than it is today still linger. Once industries try high intensities of appropriate illumination, they almost always find them effective. Not only do workers see their tasks better, but there's also an energizing effect on individuals in brighter light. People tend to prefer dimly lit rooms for resting and daydreaming. A room that’s brightly lit with well-designed, non-glare fixtures is comfortable but not suitable for quiet reflection. It’s a space meant for activity. This might be one of the reasons why adequate lighting leads to increased productivity.
Civilization has just passed the threshold of the age of adequate artificial lighting and only a small percentage of the industries have increased their lighting standards commensurately to the possibilities of the present time. If high-intensity artificial lighting was installed in all the industries and a 15 per cent. increase in production resulted, as tests appear to indicate, the increased production would be equal to that of nearly two million workers. This great increase in output is brought about by lighting at an insignificant increase in cost but without the additional consumption of food or clothing. Besides this increase in production there is the decrease in spoilage. The saving possible in this respect through adequate lighting has been estimated for the industries of this country at $100,000,000. If mankind is to have conveniences and luxuries, efficiency in production must be practised to the utmost and in the foregoing a proved means has been discussed.
Civilization has just entered the age of adequate artificial lighting, and only a small percentage of industries have improved their lighting standards to match today’s capabilities. If high-intensity artificial lighting were installed across all industries, and this led to a 15 percent increase in production, as tests suggest, the added output would be equivalent to nearly two million workers. This significant boost in production comes from lighting at a minimal cost, without needing more food or clothing. Additionally, there is a reduction in spoilage. The potential savings in this area through proper lighting have been estimated at $100,000,000 for industries in this country. If humanity wants conveniences and luxuries, production efficiency must be maximized, and the previous points have discussed a proven method to achieve that.
There are many other ways in which artificial light may serve in increasing production. Man has found that eight hours of sleep is sufficient to keep him fit for work if he has a sufficient amount of recreation. Before the advent of artificial light the activities of the primitive savage were halted by darkness. This may have been Nature's intention, but civilized man has adapted himself to the changed conditions brought about by efficient and adequate artificial light. There appears to be no fundamental reason for not imposing an artificial day upon plants, animals, chemical processes, etc.; and, in fact, experiments are being prosecuted in these directions.
There are many other ways that artificial light can help boost production. People have discovered that eight hours of sleep is enough to keep them ready for work, as long as they get enough recreation. Before artificial light was invented, the activities of early humans were stopped by darkness. This might have been Nature's plan, but modern humans have adjusted to the new conditions created by effective and ample artificial light. There seems to be no real reason not to create an artificial day for plants, animals, chemical processes, and more; in fact, experiments are currently being conducted in these areas.
The hen, when permitted to follow her natural course, rises with the sun and goes to roost at sunset. During the winter months she puts in short days off the roost. It has been shown that an artificial day, made by piecing out daylight by means of artificial light, might keep the hen scratching and feeding longer, with an increased production of eggs as a result. Many experiments of this character have been carried out, and there appears to be a general conclusion that the use of artificial light for this purpose is profitable.
The hen, when allowed to follow her natural behavior, wakes up with the sun and goes to roost at sunset. During the winter months, she spends less time off the roost. It's been shown that creating an artificial day, by extending daylight with artificial light, can keep the hen scratching and eating longer, which results in more egg production. Many experiments of this kind have been conducted, and there's a general consensus that using artificial light for this purpose is beneficial.
Experiments conducted recently by the agricultural department of a large university indicate that in poultry husbandry, when artificial light is applied to the right kind of stock with correct methods of feeding, the distribution of egg-production throughout the whole year can be radically changed. The supply of eggs may be increased in autumn and winter and decreased in spring and summer. Data on the amount of illumination have not been published, but it is said that the most satisfactory results have been obtained when the artificial illumination is used from sunset until about 9 P. M. throughout the year.
Experiments recently conducted by the agricultural department of a large university show that in poultry farming, when artificial light is correctly applied to the right type of birds along with the proper feeding methods, the pattern of egg production can be significantly altered throughout the entire year. This can lead to an increased supply of eggs in the fall and winter, while decreasing the supply in the spring and summer. Although data on the specific amount of light used hasn’t been published, it's reported that the best results occur when artificial light is used from sunset until around 9 P. M. year-round.
An increase of 30 to 40 per cent. in the number of eggs laid on a poultry-farm in England as the result of installing electric lamps in the hen-houses was reported in 1913. On this farm there were nearly 200 yards of hen-houses containing about 6000 hens, and the runs were lighted on dark mornings and early nights of the year preceding the report. About 300 small lamps varying from 8 to 32 candle-power were used in the houses. It was found that an imitation of sunset was necessary by switching off the 32 candle-power lamps at 6 P. M. and the 16 candle-power lamps at 9:30. This left only the 8 candle-power lamps burning, and in the faint illumination the hens sought the roosting-places. At 10 P. M. the remaining lights were extinguished. It was found that if all the lights were extinguished suddenly the fowls went to sleep on the ground and thus became a prey to parasites. The increase in production of eggs is brought about merely by keeping the fowls awake longer. On the same farm the growth of chicks incubated during the winter months increased by one third through the use of electric light which kept them feeding longer.
A 30 to 40 percent increase in the number of eggs laid on a poultry farm in England was reported in 1913 after electric lamps were installed in the henhouses. This farm had nearly 200 yards of henhouses containing about 6,000 hens, and the runs were lit on dark mornings and early nights in the year leading up to the report. About 300 small lamps ranging from 8 to 32 candle-power were used in the houses. It was necessary to mimic sunset by turning off the 32 candle-power lamps at 6 PM and the 16 candle-power lamps at 9:30. This left only the 8 candle-power lamps on, and in the dim light, the hens went to their roosting spots. At 10 PM, the remaining lights were turned off. It was discovered that if all the lights were turned off at once, the birds would sleep on the ground and become vulnerable to parasites. The increase in egg production was simply due to keeping the hens awake longer. On the same farm, the growth of chicks incubated during the winter months increased by one third due to the use of electric light, which kept them feeding for a longer time.
Many fishermen will testify that artificial light seems to attract fish, and various reports have been circulated regarding the efficacy of using artificial light for this purpose on a commercial scale. One report which bears the earmarks of authenticity is from Italy, where it is said that electric lights were successfully used as "bait" to augment the supply of fish during the war. The lamps were submerged to a considerable depth and the fish were attracted in such large numbers that the use of artificial light was profitable. The claims made were that the supply of fish was not only increased by night fishing but that a number of fishermen were thereby released for national service during the war. An interesting incident pertaining to fish, but perhaps not an important factor in production, is the use of electric lights in the summer over the reservoirs of a fish hatchery. These lights, which hang low, attract myriads of bugs, many of which fall in the water and furnish natural and inexpensive food for the fish.
Many fishermen will confirm that artificial light appears to attract fish, and various reports have been shared about the effectiveness of using artificial light for this purpose on a commercial level. One report that seems credible comes from Italy, where it's said that electric lights were successfully used as "bait" to increase the supply of fish during the war. The lamps were placed at significant depths, attracting such large numbers of fish that using artificial light was profitable. The claims suggested that not only was the supply of fish increased through night fishing, but it also allowed several fishermen to be released for national service during the war. An interesting incident related to fish, though not necessarily a major factor in production, involves the use of electric lights in the summer over the reservoirs of a fish hatchery. These lights, which hang low, attract countless insects, many of which fall into the water and provide natural and inexpensive food for the fish.
Many experiments have been carried out in the forcing of plants by means of artificial light. Some of these were conducted forty years ago, when artificial light was more costly than at the present time. Of course, it is well known that light is essential to plant life and in general it is reasonable to believe that daylight is the most desirable quality of light for plants. In greenhouses the forcing of plants is desirable, owing to the restricted area for cultivation. It has been established that some of the ultra-violet rays which are absorbed or not transmitted by glass are harmful to growing plants. For this reason an arc-lamp designed for forcing purposes should be equipped with a glass globe. F. W. Rane reported in 1894 upon some experiments with electric carbon-filament lamps in greenhouses in which satisfactory results were obtained by using the artificial light several hours each night. Prof. L. H. Bailey also conducted experiments with the arc-lamp and concluded that there were beneficial results if the light was filtered through clear glass. Without considering the details of the experiment, we find some of Rane's conclusions of interest, especially when it is remembered that the carbon-filament lamps used at that time were of very low efficiency compared with the filament lamps at the present time. Some of his conclusions were as follows:
Many experiments have been done on encouraging plant growth using artificial light. Some of these took place forty years ago when artificial light was more expensive than it is today. It's well known that light is essential for plant life, and generally, it's reasonable to think that natural daylight is the best quality of light for plants. In greenhouses, encouraging plant growth is important due to the limited space for cultivation. It's been established that some of the ultraviolet rays that are absorbed or not transmitted by glass can be harmful to growing plants. Therefore, an arc lamp meant for aiding growth should have a glass globe. F. W. Rane reported in 1894 on some experiments using electric carbon-filament lamps in greenhouses, where he achieved satisfactory results by using artificial light for several hours each night. Prof. L. H. Bailey also conducted experiments with the arc lamp and found positive results when the light was filtered through clear glass. Without going into the specifics of the experiment, some of Rane's conclusions are noteworthy, especially considering that the carbon-filament lamps used back then were very inefficient compared to today’s filament lamps. Some of his conclusions were as follows:
The incandescent electric light has a marked effect upon greenhouse plants.
The incandescent electric light has a significant impact on greenhouse plants.
The light appears to be beneficial to some plants grown for foliage, such as lettuce. The lettuce was earlier, weighed more and stood more erect.
The light seems to benefit certain leafy plants, like lettuce. The lettuce was ready sooner, weighed more, and grew taller.
Flowering plants blossomed earlier and continued to bloom longer under the light. The light influences some plants, such as spinach and endive, to quickly run to seed, which is objectionable in forcing these plants for sale.
The light causes some plants, such as spinach and endive, to bolt quickly, which is not ideal when growing these plants for sale.
The stronger the candle-power the more marked the results, other conditions being the same.
The stronger the light source, the more pronounced the effects, assuming all other conditions are the same.
Most plants tended toward a taller growth under the light.
Most plants generally grew taller in the light.
It is doubtful whether the incandescent light can be used in the greenhouse from a practical and economic standpoint on other plants than lettuce and perhaps flowering plants; and at present prices (1894) it is a question if it will pay to employ it even for these.
It’s unclear whether incandescent lights can be used practically and economically in greenhouses for plants other than lettuce and possibly some flowering plants; given current prices (1894), it’s questionable if it's worth using them even for those.
There are many points about the incandescent electric light that appear to make it preferable to the arc light for greenhouse use.
There are several reasons why incandescent electric light seems superior to arc light for greenhouse use.
Although we have not yet thoroughly established the economy and practicability of the electric light upon plant growth, still I am convinced that there is a future in it.
Although we haven't completely determined the effectiveness and practicality of electric light for plant growth, I still believe there’s potential in it.
These are encouraging conclusions, considering the fact that the cost of light from incandescent lamps at the present time is only a small fraction of its cost at that time.
These are positive conclusions, especially since the cost of light from incandescent bulbs today is just a fraction of what it was back then.
In an experiment conducted in England in 1913 mercury glass-tube arcs were used in one part of a hothouse and the other part was reserved for a control test. The same kind of seeds were planted in the two parts of the hothouse and all conditions were maintained the same, excepting that a mercury-vapor lamp was operated a few hours in the evening in one of them. Miss Dudgeon, who conducted the test, was enthusiastic over the results obtained. Ordinary vegetable seeds and grains germinated in eight to thirteen days in the hothouse in which the artificial light was used to lengthen the day. In the other, germination took place in from twelve to fifty-seven days. In all cases at least several days were saved in germination and in some cases several weeks. Flowers also increased in foliage, and a 25 per cent. increase in the crop of strawberries was noted. Seedlings produced under the forcing by artificial light needed virtually no hardening before being planted in the open. Professor Priestley of Bristol University said of this work:
In an experiment carried out in England in 1913, mercury glass-tube arcs were used in one section of a greenhouse, while the other section was set aside for a control test. The same type of seeds were planted in both sections of the greenhouse, and all conditions were kept consistent, except that a mercury-vapor lamp was used for a few hours in the evening in one of them. Miss Dudgeon, who oversaw the test, was thrilled with the results. Common vegetable seeds and grains sprouted in eight to thirteen days in the greenhouse where artificial light was used to extend the day. In the other section, germination took place in twelve to fifty-seven days. In every instance, at least several days were saved in the germination process, and in some cases, several weeks. Flowers also showed more foliage, and a 25 percent increase in the strawberry crop was observed. Seedlings grown under artificial light nearly required no hardening before being planted outdoors. Professor Priestley of Bristol University commented on this work:
The light seems to have been extraordinarily efficacious, producing accelerated germination, increased growth, greater depth of color, and more important still, no signs of lanky, unnatural extension of plant usually associated with forcing. Rather the plants exposed to the radiation seem to have grown if anything more sturdy than the control plants. A structural examination of the experimental and control plants carried out by means of the microscope fully confirmed Miss Dudgeon's statements both as to depth of color and greater sturdiness of the treated plants.
The light seems to have worked really well, resulting in quicker germination, more growth, richer colors, and, most importantly, no signs of unnatural stretching in the plants usually seen with forcing. In fact, the plants that were exposed to the light appear to be even sturdier than the control plants. A thorough examination of both the experimental and control plants under a microscope completely verified Miss Dudgeon's claims about the deeper color and increased sturdiness of the treated plants.
Unfortunately there is much confusion amid the results of experiments pertaining to the effects of different rays, including ultra-violet, visible and infra-red, upon plant growth. If this aspect was thoroughly established, investigations could be outlined to greater advantage and efficient light-sources could be chosen with certainty. There is the discouraging feature that the average intensity of daylight illumination from sunrise to sunset in the summer-time is several thousand foot-candles. The cost of obtaining this great intensity by means of artificial light would be prohibitive. However, the daylight illumination in a greenhouse in winter is very much less than the intensity outdoors in summer. Indeed, this intensity perhaps averages only a few hundred foot-candles in winter. There is encouragement in this fact and there is hope that a little light is relatively much more effective than a great amount. Expressed in another manner, it is possible that a little light is much more effective than no light at all. Experiments with artificial light indicate very generally an increased growth.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of confusion surrounding the results of experiments on how different types of rays, including ultraviolet, visible, and infrared, affect plant growth. If we could clearly understand this aspect, we could plan investigations more effectively and choose the right light sources with confidence. The downside is that the average intensity of daylight from sunrise to sunset during the summer is several thousand foot-candles. The cost of achieving this high intensity with artificial light would be extremely expensive. However, the daylight intensity in a greenhouse during winter is much lower than the intensity outside in summer. In fact, this intensity may only average a few hundred foot-candles in winter. There is some encouragement in this because it suggests that even a little light can be relatively much more effective than a lot of light. In other words, a small amount of light could be significantly more beneficial than having no light at all. Experiments with artificial light generally show increased growth.
Recently Hayden and Steinmetz experimented with a plot of ground 5 feet by 9 feet, over which were hung five 500-watt gas-filled tungsten lamps 3 feet above the ground and 17 inches apart. The lamps were equipped with reflectors and the resulting illumination was 700 foot-candles. This is an extremely high intensity of artificial illumination and is comparable with daylight in greenhouses. The only seeds planted were those of string beans and two beds were carried through to maturity, one lighted by daylight only and the other by daylight and artificial light, the latter being in operation twenty-fours hours per day. The plants under the additional artificial light grew more rapidly than the others, and of the various records kept the gain in time was in all cases about 50 per cent. From the standpoint of profitableness the artificial lighting was not justified. However, there are several points to be brought out before considering this conclusion too seriously. First, it appears unwise to use the artificial light during the day; second, it appears possible that a few hours of artificial light in the evening would suffice for considerable forcing; third, it is possible that a much lower intensity of artificial light might be more effective per lumen than the great intensity used; fourth, it is quite possible that some other efficient light-source may be more effective in forcing the growth of plants. These and many other factors must be carefully determined before judgment can be passed on the efficacy of artificial light in reducing the cost of living in this direction. Certainly, artificial light has been shown to increase the growth of plants and it appears probable that future generations at least will find it profitable to use the efficient light-producers of the coming ages in this manner.
Recently, Hayden and Steinmetz tested a 5-foot by 9-foot plot of land, where they hung five 500-watt gas-filled tungsten lamps 3 feet above the ground and 17 inches apart. The lamps had reflectors, and the resulting brightness was 700 foot-candles. This is a very high level of artificial light, similar to daylight in greenhouses. The only seeds planted were string beans, and two beds were grown to maturity: one using only daylight and the other using both daylight and artificial light, which operated 24 hours a day. The plants under supplemental artificial light grew faster than the others, and records showed that the growth time was about 50 percent less in all cases. From a profitability standpoint, the artificial lighting didn't seem justified. However, there are several points to consider before taking this conclusion too seriously. First, it seems unwise to use artificial light during the day; second, a few hours of artificial light in the evening might be enough for significant growth; third, a much lower intensity of artificial light might be more effective per lumen than the high intensity used; fourth, it's quite possible that another efficient light source could be more effective at promoting plant growth. These and many other factors need to be carefully evaluated before making a judgment on the effectiveness of artificial light in reducing living costs in this way. Certainly, artificial light has been shown to enhance plant growth, and it seems likely that future generations will find it beneficial to use the efficient light sources of the future in this way.
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT IN PHOTOGRAPHY
Artificial Light in Photography
Many other instances could be cited in which artificial light is very closely associated with the cost of living. Overseas shipment of fruit from the Canadian Northwest is responsible for a decided innovation in fruit-picking. In searching for a cause of rotting during shipment it was finally concluded that the temperature at the time of picking was the controlling factor. As a consequence, daytime was considered undesirable for picking and an electric company supplied electric lighting for the orchards in order that the picking might be done during the cool of night. This change is said to have remedied the situation. Cases of threshing and other agricultural operations being carried on at night are becoming more numerous. These are just the beginnings of artificial light in a new field or in a new relation to civilization. Its economic value has been demonstrated in the ordinary fields of lighting and these new applications are merely the initial skirmishes which precede the conquest of new territory. The modern illuminants have been developed so recently that the new possibilities have not yet been established. However, artificial light is already a factor on the side of the people in the struggle against the increasing cost of living, and its future in this direction is still more promising.
Many other examples can be mentioned where artificial light is closely linked to the cost of living. The international shipping of fruit from the Canadian Northwest has led to a significant change in the way fruit is picked. When investigating the cause of spoilage during shipping, it was determined that the temperature at the time of picking was crucial. As a result, daytime was deemed unsuitable for picking, and an electric company provided lighting for the orchards so that the picking could take place in the cooler nighttime hours. This adjustment is said to have fixed the issue. More cases of threshing and other farming activities happening at night are emerging. These are just the early stages of artificial light entering a new area or taking on a new role in society. Its economic benefits have already been proven in traditional lighting, and these new uses are just the beginning of exploring new opportunities. Modern light sources have been developed so recently that their full potential hasn't been realized yet. However, artificial light is already helping people in their battle against rising living costs, and its future in this regard looks even more promising.
XIX
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT AND CHEMISTRY
Some one in an early century was the first to notice that the sun's rays tanned the skin, and this unknown individual made the initial discovery in what is now an extensive branch of science known as photo-chemistry. The fading of dyes, the bleaching of textiles, the darkening of silver salts, the synthesis and decomposition of compounds are common examples of chemical reactions induced by light. There are thousands of other examples of the chemical effects of light some of which have been utilized by mankind. Others await the development of more efficient light-sources emitting greater quantities of active rays, and many still remain interesting scientific facts without any apparent practical applications at the present time. Visible and ultra-violet rays are the radiations almost entirely responsible for photochemical reactions, but the most active of these are the blue, violet, and ultra-violet rays. These are often designated chemical or actinic rays in order to distinguish the group as a whole from other groups such as ultra-violet, visible, and infra-red. Light is a unique agent in chemical reactions because it is not a material substance. It neither contaminates nor leaves a residue. Although much information pertaining to photochemistry has been available for years, the absence of powerful light-sources emitting so-called chemical rays in large quantities inhibited the practical development of the science of photochemistry. Even to-day, with vast applications of light in this manner, mankind is only beginning to utilize its chemical powers.
Someone in an early century was the first to notice that the sun's rays tanned the skin, and this unknown individual made the initial discovery in what is now a broad field of science known as photochemistry. The fading of dyes, the bleaching of textiles, the darkening of silver salts, and the synthesis and breakdown of compounds are common examples of chemical reactions triggered by light. There are thousands of other examples of the chemical effects of light, some of which have been used by people. Others are waiting for the development of more efficient light sources that emit greater amounts of active rays, and many still remain interesting scientific facts without any obvious practical applications at the moment. Visible and ultraviolet rays are the radiations primarily responsible for photochemical reactions, but the most active among them are the blue, violet, and ultraviolet rays. These are often referred to as chemical or actinic rays to distinguish this group as a whole from other groups like ultraviolet, visible, and infrared. Light is a unique agent in chemical reactions because it is not a material substance. It neither contaminates nor leaves a residue. Although much information on photochemistry has been available for years, the lack of powerful light sources emitting the so-called chemical rays in large quantities hindered the practical development of the science of photochemistry. Even today, with extensive applications of light in this way, humanity is only just beginning to make use of its chemical abilities.
STERILIZING WATER WITH RADIANT ENERGY FROM QUARTZ MERCURY-ARCS
STERILIZING WATER WITH RADIANT ENERGY FROM QUARTZ MERCURY-ARCS
Although it appears that the chemical action of light was known to the ancients, the earliest photochemical investigations which could be considered scientific and systematic were those of K. W. Scheele in 1777 on silver salts. An extract from his own account is as follows:
Although it seems that the ancient people were aware of the chemical effects of light, the first photochemical studies that could be deemed scientific and systematic were conducted by K. W. Scheele in 1777 on silver salts. Here’s an excerpt from his own account:
I precipitated a solution of silver by sal-ammoniac; then I edulcorated (washed) it and dried the precipitate and exposed it to the beams of the sun for two weeks; after which I stirred the powder and repeated the same several times. Hereupon I poured some caustic spirit of sal-ammoniac (strong ammonia) on this, in all appearance, black powder, and set it by for digestion. This menstruum (solvent) dissolved a quantity of luna cornua (horn silver), though some black powder remained undissolved. The powder having been washed was, for the greater part, dissolved by a pure acid of nitre (nitric acid), which, by the operation, acquired volatility. This solution I precipitated again by means of sal-ammoniac into horn silver. Hence it follows that the blackness which the luna cornua acquires from the sun's light, and likewise the solution of silver poured on chalk, is silver by reduction. I mixed so much of distilled water with the well-washed horn silver as would just cover this powder. The half of this mixture I poured into a white crystal phial, exposed it to the beams of the sun, and shook it several times each day; the other half I set in a dark place. After having exposed the one mixture during the space of two weeks, I filtrated the water standing over the horn silver, grown already black; I let some of this water fall by drops in a solution of silver, which was immediately precipitated into horn silver.
I made a silver solution using ammonium chloride; then I washed and dried the precipitate and left it in sunlight for two weeks. After that, I stirred the powder and repeated the process several times. Next, I poured strong ammonia onto this seemingly black powder and let it sit to digest. This solvent dissolved some horn silver, although some black powder remained undissolved. After washing, most of the powder was dissolved by pure nitric acid, which became volatile during the process. I then precipitated this solution again with ammonium chloride into horn silver. This shows that the black color that horn silver gains from sunlight, as well as silver solutions poured on chalk, is silver by reduction. I mixed enough distilled water with the well-washed horn silver to just cover the powder. I poured half of this mixture into a clear glass vial, exposed it to sunlight, and shook it several times a day; the other half I left in a dark place. After exposing the first mixture for two weeks, I filtered the water sitting over the already black horn silver; I let some of this water drip into a silver solution, which immediately precipitated into horn silver.
This extract shows that Scheele dealt with the reducing action of light. He found that silver chloride was decomposed by light and that there was a liberation of chlorine. However, it was learned later that dried silver chloride sealed in a tube from which the air was exhausted is not discolored by light and that substances must be present to absorb the chlorine. Scheele's work aroused much interest in photochemical effects and many investigations followed. In many of these the superiority of blue, violet, and ultra-violet rays was demonstrated. In 1802 the first photograph was made by Wedgwood, who copied paintings upon glass and made profiles by casting shadows upon a sensitive chemical compound. However, he was not able to fix the image. Much study and experimentation were expended upon photochemical effects, especially with silver compounds, before Niepce developed a method of producing pictures which were subsequently unaffected by light. Later Daguerre became associated with Niepce and the famous daguerreotype was the result. Apparently the latter was chiefly responsible for the development of this first commercial process, the products of which are still to be found in the family album. A century has elapsed since this earliest period of commercial photography, and during each year progress has been made, until at the present time photography is thoroughly woven into the activities of civilized mankind.
This excerpt shows that Scheele studied how light can reduce substances. He discovered that light could break down silver chloride, releasing chlorine. However, it was later discovered that dried silver chloride sealed in an airless tube doesn't turn color in light and that certain substances need to be present to absorb the chlorine. Scheele's work sparked significant interest in photochemical effects, leading to many investigations. In a lot of these studies, blue, violet, and ultraviolet rays proved to be especially effective. In 1802, Wedgwood created the first photograph by copying paintings on glass and making profiles by casting shadows on a light-sensitive chemical compound. However, he couldn’t stabilize the images. A lot of research and experimentation went into photochemical effects, particularly with silver compounds, before Niepce came up with a method for producing light-resistant images. Later, Daguerre partnered with Niepce, resulting in the famous daguerreotype. Daguerre was primarily responsible for developing this first commercial photography process, which is still represented in family albums today. A century has passed since the dawn of commercial photography, and every year has seen advancements, until now, when photography is deeply integrated into the lives of modern society.
In those earliest years a person was obliged to sit motionless in the sun for minutes in order to have his picture taken. The development of a century is exemplified in the "snapshot" of the present time. Photographic exposures outdoors at present are commonly one thousandth of a second, and indoors under modern artificial light miles of "moving-picture" film are made daily in which the individual exposures are very small fractions of a second. Artificial light is playing a great part in this branch of photochemistry, and the development of artificial light for the various photographic needs is best emphasized by reminding the reader that the sources must be generally comparable with the sun in actinic or chemical power. The intensity of illumination due to sunlight on a clear day when the sun is near the zenith is commonly 10,000 foot-candles on a surface perpendicular to the direct rays. This is equivalent to the illumination due to a source 90,000 candle-power at a distance of three feet. The sun delivers about 200,000,000,000 horse-power to the earth continuously, which is estimated to be about one million times the amount of power generated artificially on the earth. Of this inconceivable quantity of energy a small part is absorbed by vegetation, some is reflected and radiated back into space, and the balance heats the earth. To store some of this energy so that it may be utilized at will in any desired form is one of the dreams of science. However, artificial light-sources are depended upon at present in many photographic and other chemical processes.
In those early years, a person had to sit still in the sun for minutes to get their picture taken. A century's progress is shown in today's "snapshot." Nowadays, outdoor photographic exposures are typically one thousandth of a second, and indoors, under modern artificial light, miles of "moving-picture" film are created daily, where individual exposures are very brief fractions of a second. Artificial light plays a significant role in this area of photochemistry, and the advancement of artificial light for various photography needs is highlighted by reminding readers that these sources must generally match the sun in their chemical efficiency. The brightness from sunlight on a clear day, when the sun is high in the sky, is about 10,000 foot-candles on a surface facing the direct rays. This is equivalent to the brightness from a source with 90,000 candle-power, three feet away. The sun delivers around 200 billion horse-power to the earth continuously, which is estimated to be about a million times the power generated artificially on Earth. Of this incredible amount of energy, a small part is absorbed by plants, some is reflected and sent back into space, and the rest heats the planet. Storing some of this energy for use in any desired form is one of science's ambitions. However, we currently rely on artificial light sources for many photographic and other chemical processes.
Although two illuminants may be of the same luminous intensity, they may differ widely in actinic value. It is impossible to rate the different illuminants in a general manner as to actinic value because the various photochemical reactions are not affected to the same extent by rays of a given wave-length. Nearly all human eyes see visible rays in approximately the same manner, but the multitude of chemical reactions show a wide variation in sensitivity to the various rays. For example, one photographic emulsion may be sensitive only to ultra-violet, violet, and blue rays and another to all these rays and also to the green, yellow, and red. Therefore, one illuminant may be superior to another for one photochemical reaction, while the reverse may be true in the case of another reaction. In general, it may be said that the arc-lamps including the mercury-arcs provide the most active illuminants for photochemical processes; however, a large number of electric incandescent filament lamps are used in photographic work.
Although two light sources may have the same brightness, they can vary greatly in their ability to cause chemical reactions. It's impossible to rank light sources in terms of their effectiveness for these reactions because different photochemical processes respond differently to specific wavelengths of light. Almost all human eyes perceive visible light in a similar way, but the multitude of chemical reactions can show a wide range of sensitivity to different wavelengths. For instance, one photographic film might only be sensitive to ultraviolet, violet, and blue light, while another film could be sensitive to those lights plus green, yellow, and red. This means that one light source might be better for a specific chemical reaction, while a different source could be more effective for another reaction. Generally speaking, arc lamps, including mercury arcs, provide the most effective light for photochemical processes; however, many electric incandescent bulbs are also commonly used in photography.
The photo-engraver has been independent of sunlight since the practical development of his art. In fact, the printer could not depend upon sunlight for making the engravings which are used to illustrate the magazines and newspapers. The newspaper photographer may make a "flashlight" exposure, develop his negative, and make a print from it under artificial light. He may turn this over to the photo-engraver who carries out his work by means of powerful arc-lamps and in an hour or two after the original exposure was made the newspaper containing the illustration is being sold on the streets.
The photo-engraver has been free from relying on sunlight since the practical development of his craft. In fact, the printer couldn’t rely on sunlight to create the engravings used to illustrate magazines and newspapers. The newspaper photographer can take a "flashlight" exposure, develop the negative, and create a print under artificial light. He can then hand this over to the photo-engraver, who completes the work using powerful arc lamps, and within an hour or two after the original exposure, the newspaper with the illustration is being sold on the streets.
The moving-picture studio is independent of daylight in indoor settings and there is a tendency toward the exclusive use of artificial light. In this field mercury-vapor lamps, arc-lamps, and tungsten photographic lamps are used. Similarly, in the portrait studio there is a tendency for the photographer to leave the skylighted upper floors and to utilize artificial light. In this field the tungsten photographic lamp is gaining in popularity, owing to its simplicity and to other advantages. Artificial light in general is more satisfactory than natural light for many kinds of photographic work because through the ease of controlling it a greater variety of more artistic effects may be obtained. In ordinary photographic printing tungsten lamps are widely used, but in blue-printing the white flame-arc and the mercury-vapor lamp are generally employed. Not many years ago the blue-printer waited for the sun to appear in order to make his prints, but to-day large machines operate continuously under the light of powerful artificial sources. How many realize that the blue-print is almost universally at the foundation of everything at the present time? Not only are products made from blue-prints but the machinery which makes the products is built from blue-prints. Even the building which houses the machinery is first constructed from blue-prints. They form an endless chain in the activities of present civilization.
The filmmaking studio can work completely independent of natural light indoors, and there's a growing trend toward using only artificial light. In this industry, they use mercury-vapor lamps, arc lamps, and tungsten photographic lamps. Similarly, in portrait studios, photographers are moving away from skylit upper floors and opting for artificial light instead. The tungsten photographic lamp is becoming more popular due to its simplicity and other benefits. Overall, artificial light is often more effective than natural light for many types of photography because it's easier to control, allowing for a wider range of artistic effects. For standard photographic printing, tungsten lamps are commonly used, but for blueprints, the white flame arc and mercury-vapor lamps are typically utilized. Not long ago, blueprint operators had to wait for the sun to come out to make their prints, but now large machines can work continuously under powerful artificial lights. How many people realize that blueprints are basically the foundation of everything today? Products are made from blueprints, the machinery that makes those products is designed based on blueprints, and even the buildings that house the machinery are first planned out with blueprints. They create an unending chain in the workings of modern civilization.
Artificial light has been a great factor in the practical development of photography and it is looked upon for aid in many other directions. Although there is a multitude of reactions in photographic processes which are brought about by exposure to light, these represent relatively few of the photochemical reactions. In general, it may be stated that light is capable of causing nearly every type of reaction. The chemical compounds which are photo-sensitive are very numerous. Many of the compounds of silver, gold, platinum, mercury, iron, copper, manganese, lead, nickel, and tin are photo-sensitive and these have been widely investigated. Light and oxygen cause many oxidation reactions and, on the other hand, light reduces many compounds such as silver salts, even to the extent of liberating the metal. Oxygen is converted partially into ozone under the influence of certain rays and there are many examples of polymerization caused by light.
Artificial light has been a major factor in the practical development of photography and is sought after for assistance in many other areas. While there are numerous reactions in photographic processes triggered by light exposure, these are just a small subset of the photochemical reactions. Generally, it can be said that light can initiate almost every kind of reaction. The number of chemical compounds that are sensitive to light is extensive. Many compounds of silver, gold, platinum, mercury, iron, copper, manganese, lead, nickel, and tin are light-sensitive and have been thoroughly studied. Light and oxygen induce many oxidation reactions, and conversely, light reduces various compounds, such as silver salts, even to the point of freeing the metal. Under the influence of certain rays, oxygen is partially transformed into ozone, and there are numerous instances of polymerization initiated by light.
Various allotropic changes of the elements are due to the influence of light; for example, a sulphur soluble in carbon disulphide is converted into sulphur which is insoluble, and the rate of change of yellow phosphorus into the red variety is greatly accelerated by light. Hydrogen and chlorine combine under the action of light with explosive rapidity to form hydrochloric acid and there are many other examples of the synthesizing action of light. Carbon monoxide and chlorine combine to form phosgene and the combination of chlorine, bromine, and iodine, with organic compounds, is much hastened by exposing the mixture to light. In a similar manner many decompositions are due to light; for example, hydrogen peroxide is decomposed into water and oxygen. This suggests the reason for the use of brown bottles as containers for many chemical compounds. Such glass does not transmit appreciably the so-called actinic or chemical rays.
Various allotropic changes in elements are influenced by light. For example, sulfur that dissolves in carbon disulfide becomes insoluble sulfur, and the transformation of yellow phosphorus into the red form is significantly sped up by light. Hydrogen and chlorine combine rapidly and explosively under light to form hydrochloric acid, and there are many other instances of light's synthesizing action. Carbon monoxide and chlorine react to form phosgene, and the combination of chlorine, bromine, and iodine with organic compounds is much quicker when the mixture is exposed to light. Similarly, many decompositions are caused by light; for instance, hydrogen peroxide breaks down into water and oxygen. This explains why brown bottles are used to store many chemical compounds. Such glass doesn't significantly transmit the so-called actinic or chemical rays.
There is a large number of reactions due to light in organic chemistry and one of fundamental importance to mankind is the effect of light on the chlorophyll, the green coloring matter in vegetation. No permanent change takes place in the chlorophyll, but by the action of light it enables the plant to absorb oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water and to use these to build up the complex organic substances which are found in plants. Radiant energy or light is absorbed and converted into chemical energy. This use of radiant energy occurs only in those parts of the plant in which chlorophyll is present, that is, in the leaves and stems. These parts absorb the radiant energy and take carbon dioxide from the air through breathing openings. They convert the radiant energy into chemical energy and use this energy in decomposing the carbon dioxide. The oxygen is exhausted and the carbon enters into the structure of the plant. The energy of plant life thus comes from radiant energy and with this aid the simple compounds, such as the carbon dioxide of the air and the phosphates and nitrates of the soil, are built into complex structures. Thus plants are constructive and synthetic in operation. It is interesting to note that the animal organism converts complex compounds into mechanical and heat energy. The animal organism depends upon the synthetic work of plants, consuming as food the complex structures built by them under the action of light. For example, plants inhale carbon dioxide, liberate the oxygen, and store the carbon in complex compounds, while the animal uses oxygen to burn up the complex compounds derived from plants and exhales carbon dioxide. It is a beautiful cycle, which shows that ultimately all life on earth depends upon light and other radiant energy associated with it. Contrary to most photochemical reactions, it appears that plant life utilize yellow, red, and infra-red energy more than the blue, violet, and ultra-violet.
There are many reactions caused by light in organic chemistry, and one that is critically important to humanity is how light affects chlorophyll, the green pigment found in plants. No permanent change happens to the chlorophyll, but through the action of light, it allows the plant to take in oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water, using these elements to create the complex organic substances found in plants. Radiant energy or light is absorbed and transformed into chemical energy. This conversion occurs only in the parts of the plant where chlorophyll is present, namely in the leaves and stems. These parts absorb the radiant energy and take in carbon dioxide from the air through openings called stomata. They turn radiant energy into chemical energy and use that energy to break down carbon dioxide. The oxygen is released, and the carbon is incorporated into the plant's structure. Therefore, the energy in plant life comes from radiant energy, which helps assemble simple compounds, like carbon dioxide from the air and phosphates and nitrates from the soil, into complex structures. This means that plants are constructive and synthetic in their processes. It's interesting to note that animals convert these complex compounds into mechanical and heat energy. Animals rely on the synthetic processes of plants, consuming the complex structures they create using light. For instance, plants take in carbon dioxide, release oxygen, and store carbon in complex compounds, while animals use oxygen to metabolize the complex compounds from plants and exhale carbon dioxide. It is a remarkable cycle that demonstrates that all life on earth ultimately depends on light and the radiant energy that comes with it. Unlike most photochemical reactions, it seems that plant life utilizes yellow, red, and infrared energy more than blue, violet, and ultraviolet.
In general, great intensities of blue light and of the closely associated rays are necessary for most photochemical reactions with which man is industrially interested. It has been found that the white flame-arc excels other artificial light-sources in hastening the chlorination of natural gas in the production of chloroform. One advantage of the radiation from this light-source is that it does not extend far into the ultra-violet, for the ultra-violet rays of short wave-lengths decompose some compounds. In other words, it is necessary to choose radiation which is effective but which does not have rays associated with it that destroy the desired products of the reaction. By the use of a shunt across the arc the light can be gradually varied over a considerable range of intensity. Another advantage of the flame-arc in photochemistry is the ease with which the quality or spectral character of the radiant energy may be altered by varying the chemical salts used in the carbons. For example, strontium fluoride is used in the red flame-arc whose radiant energy is rich in red and yellow. Calcium fluoride is used in the carbons of the yellow flame-arc which emits excessive red and green rays causing by visual synthesis the yellow color. The radiant energy emitted by the snow-white flame-arc is a close approximation to average daylight both as to visible and to ultra-violet rays. Its carbons contain rare-earths. The uses of the flame-arcs are continually being extended because they are of high intensity and efficiency and they afford a variety of color or spectral quality. A million white flame-carbons are being used annually in this country for various photochemical processes.
In general, high intensities of blue light and the related rays are necessary for most photochemical reactions that are relevant to industrial applications. It has been found that the white flame-arc outperforms other artificial light sources in speeding up the chlorination of natural gas in chloroform production. One advantage of this light source's radiation is that it doesn’t extend too far into the ultraviolet range, as short-wavelength ultraviolet rays can break down certain compounds. In other words, it's essential to select radiation that is effective but doesn’t include rays that would destroy the desired reaction products. By using a shunt across the arc, the light intensity can be gradually adjusted over a wide range. Another benefit of the flame-arc in photochemistry is how easily the quality or spectral characteristics of the radiant energy can be changed by altering the chemical salts used in the carbons. For instance, strontium fluoride is used in the red flame-arc, which emits energy rich in red and yellow. Calcium fluoride is utilized in the yellow flame-arc's carbons, which produce excessive red and green rays that visually combine to create a yellow color. The radiant energy from the snow-white flame-arc closely resembles average daylight in terms of visible and ultraviolet rays. Its carbons contain rare-earth elements. The applications of flame-arcs are constantly being expanded because they are high in intensity and efficiency, offering a variety of colors or spectral qualities. Every year, a million white flame-carbons are used in this country for various photochemical processes.
Of the hundreds of dyes and pigments available many are not permanent and until recent years sunlight was depended upon for testing the permanency of coloring materials. As a consequence such tests could not be carried out very systematically until a powerful artificial source of light resembling daylight was available. It appears that the white flame-arc is quite satisfactory in this field, for tests indicate that the chemical effect of this arc in causing dye-fading is four or five times as great as that of the best June sunlight if the materials are placed within ten inches of a 28-ampere arc. It has been computed that in several days of continuous operation of this arc the same fading results can be obtained as in a year's exposure to daylight in the northern part of this country. Inasmuch as the fastness of colors in daylight is usually of interest, the artificial illuminant used for color-fading should be spectrally similar to daylight. Apparently the white flame-arc fulfils this requirement as well as being a powerful source.
Of the hundreds of dyes and pigments available, many aren't permanent, and until recent years, people relied on sunlight to test the durability of coloring materials. Because of this, such tests couldn't be conducted very systematically until a strong artificial light source similar to daylight became available. It seems that the white flame-arc works quite well for this purpose, as tests show that the chemical effect of this arc in causing dye-fading is four to five times greater than that of the best June sunlight when the materials are within ten inches of a 28-ampere arc. It has been estimated that after several days of continuous operation of this arc, the same fading results can be achieved as in a year's exposure to daylight in the northern part of the country. Since the fastness of colors in daylight is usually of interest, the artificial light used for color-fading should be spectrally similar to daylight. It appears that the white flame-arc meets this requirement and is also a powerful source.
Lithopone, a white pigment consisting of zinc sulphide and barium sulphate, sometimes exhibits the peculiar property of darkening on exposure to sunlight. This property is due to an impurity and apparently cannot be predicted by chemical analysis. During the cloudy days and winter months when powerful sunlight is unavailable, the manufacturer is in doubt as to the quality of his product and he needs an artificial light-source for testing it. In such a case the white flame-arc is serving satisfactorily, but it is not difficult to obtain effects with other light-sources in a short time if an image of the light-source is focused upon the material by means of a lens. In fact, a darkening of lithopone may be obtained in a minute by focusing upon it the image of a quartz mercury-arc by means of a quartz lens. In special cases of this sort the use of a focused image is far superior to the ordinary illumination from the light-source, but, of course, this is impracticable when testing a large number of samples simultaneously. Incidentally, lithopone which turns gray or nearly black in the sunlight regains its whiteness during the night.
Lithopone, a white pigment made of zinc sulfide and barium sulfate, sometimes has the unusual property of darkening when exposed to sunlight. This effect is caused by an impurity and can't be predicted through chemical analysis. On cloudy days and during winter months when strong sunlight isn't available, manufacturers are uncertain about the quality of their product and need an artificial light source for testing. In these situations, a white flame arc works well, but it's also easy to achieve results with other light sources quickly by focusing their image on the material using a lens. Actually, you can cause lithopone to darken within a minute by focusing the image of a quartz mercury arc onto it with a quartz lens. For these specific scenarios, using a focused image is much better than regular lighting from the source, though it's not practical when testing many samples at the same time. By the way, lithopone that turns gray or almost black in sunlight returns to its white state at night.
An amusing incident is told of a young man who painted his boat one night with a white paint in which lithopone was the pigment. On returning home the next afternoon after the boat had been exposed to sunlight all day, he was astonished to see that it was black. Being very much perturbed, he telephoned to the paint store, but the proprietor escaped a scathing lecture by having closed his shop at the usual hour. The young man telephoned in the morning and told the proprietor what had happened, but on being asked to make certain of the facts he went to the window and looked at his boat and behold! it was white. It had regained whiteness during the night but would turn black again during the day. Although pigments and dyes are not generally as peculiar as lithopone, much uncertainty is eliminated by systematic tests under constant, continuous, and controllable artificial light.
An amusing story is about a young man who painted his boat one night with white paint that had lithopone as the pigment. When he got home the next afternoon after the boat had been out in the sun all day, he was shocked to see that it was black. Very upset, he called the paint store, but the owner avoided a harsh reprimand by closing the shop at the usual time. The next morning, the young man called the owner and explained what had happened. When asked to verify the situation, he went to the window and looked at his boat, and lo and behold! It was white. It had returned to its white color overnight but would turn black again during the day. While pigments and dyes aren't usually as odd as lithopone, a lot of confusion can be resolved with controlled tests under constant, artificial light.
The sources of so-called chemical rays are numerous for laboratory work, but there is a need for highly efficient powerful producers of this kind of energy. In general the flame-arcs perhaps are foremost sources at the present time, with other kinds of carbon arcs and the quartz mercury-arc ranking next. One advantage of the mercury-arc is its constancy. Furthermore, for work with a single wave-length it is easy to isolate one of the spectral lines. The regular glass-tube mercury-arc is an efficient producer of the actinic rays and as a consequence has been extensively used in photographic work and in other photochemical processes. An excellent source for experimental work can be made easily by producing an arc between two small iron rods. The electric spark has served in much experimental work, but the total radiant energy from it is small. By varying the metals used for electrodes a considerable variety in the radiant energy is possible. This is also true of the electric arcs, and the flame-arcs may be varied widely by using different chemical compounds in the carbons.
There are many sources of so-called chemical rays for laboratory work, but there's a need for highly efficient and powerful producers of this type of energy. Right now, flame arcs are probably the leading sources, followed by other types of carbon arcs and quartz mercury arcs. One advantage of the mercury arc is its consistency. Additionally, when working with a single wavelength, it's easy to isolate one of the spectral lines. The regular glass-tube mercury arc is an effective producer of actinic rays, which is why it has been widely used in photography and other photochemical processes. A good source for experimental work can be easily created by generating an arc between two small iron rods. The electric spark has been used in many experiments, but its total radiant energy is low. By changing the metals used for the electrodes, a wide variety of radiant energy can be achieved. The same is true for electric arcs, and flame arcs can be greatly varied by using different chemical compounds in the carbons.
There are other effects of light which have found applications but not in chemical reactions. For example, selenium changes its electrical resistance under the influence of light and many applications of this phenomenon have been made. Another group of light-effects forms a branch of science known as photo-electricity. If a spark-gap is illuminated by ultra-violet rays, the resistance of the gap is diminished. If an insulated zinc plate is illuminated by ultra-violet or violet rays, it will gradually become positively charged. These effects are due to the emission of electrons from the metal. Violet and ultra-violet rays will cause a colorless glass containing manganese to assume a pinkish color. The latter is the color which manganese imparts to glass and under the influence of these rays the color is augmented. Certain ultra-violet rays also ionize the air and cause the formation of ozone. This can be detected near a quartz mercury-arc, for example, by the characteristic odor.
There are other effects of light that have been applied, but not in chemical reactions. For instance, selenium changes its electrical resistance when exposed to light, leading to many uses of this phenomenon. Another category of light effects falls under a branch of science called photoelectricity. When a spark gap is exposed to ultraviolet rays, the resistance of the gap decreases. If an insulated zinc plate is exposed to ultraviolet or violet rays, it will gradually become positively charged. These effects occur because electrons are emitted from the metal. Violet and ultraviolet rays will cause colorless glass containing manganese to take on a pinkish hue. This pinkish color is due to manganese's effect on glass, and the presence of these rays enhances it. Certain ultraviolet rays also ionize the air and lead to the formation of ozone. This can be detected near a quartz mercury-arc, for example, by its distinctive smell.
The foregoing are only a few of the multitude of photochemical reactions and other effects of radiant energy. The development of this field awaits to some extent the production of so-called actinic rays more efficiently and in greater quantities, but there are now many practical applications of artificial light for these purposes. In the extensive fields of photography various artificial light-sources have served for many years and they are constantly finding more applications. Artificial light is now used to a considerable extent in the industries in connection with chemical processes, but little information is available, owing to the secrecy attending these new developments in industrial processes. However, this brief chapter has been introduced in order to indicate another field of activity in which artificial light is serving. It is agreed by scientists that photochemistry has a promising future. Mankind harnesses nature's forces and produces light and this light is put to work to exert its influence for the further benefit of mankind. Science has been at work systematically for only a century, but the accomplishments have been so wonderful that the imagination dares not attempt to prophesy the achievements of the next century.
The above are just a few of the many photochemical reactions and effects of light energy. The progress in this area depends somewhat on producing actinic rays more efficiently and in larger amounts, but there are already many practical uses of artificial light for these purposes. In the broad field of photography, various artificial light sources have been used for many years, and they are continually finding more uses. Artificial light is now widely used in industries related to chemical processes, though there's little information available due to the secrecy surrounding these new industrial developments. However, this brief chapter aims to highlight another area where artificial light is making an impact. Scientists agree that photochemistry has a bright future. Humanity harnesses nature's forces to produce light, and this light is utilized to further benefit mankind. Science has only been systematically exploring this for about a century, but the achievements have been so remarkable that it's hard to imagine what the next century will bring.
XX
LIGHT AND HEALTH
The human being evolved without clothing and the body was bathed with light throughout the day, but civilization has gone to the other extreme of covering the body with clothing which keeps most of it in darkness. Inasmuch as light and the invisible radiant energy which is associated with it are known to be very influential agencies in a multitude of ways, the question arises: Has this shielding of the body had any marked influence upon the human organism? Although there is a vast literature upon the subject of light-therapy, the question remains unanswered, owing to the conflicting results and the absence of standardization of experimental details. In fact, most investigations are subject to the criticism that the data are inadequate. Throughout many centuries light has been credited with various influences upon physiological processes and upon the mind. But most of the early applications had no foundation of scientific facts. Unfortunately, many of the claims pertaining to the physiological and psychological effects of light at the present time are conflicting and they do not rest upon an established scientific foundation. Furthermore some of them are at variance with the possibilities and an unprejudiced observer must conclude that much systematic work must be done before order may arise from the present chaos. This does not mean that many of the effects are not real, for radiant energy is known to cause certain effects, and viewing the subject broadly it appears that light is already serving humanity in this field and that its future is promising.
The human being evolved without clothes, with the body exposed to light all day. However, civilization has gone to the opposite extreme, covering the body with clothing that keeps much of it in darkness. Since we know that light and the invisible radiant energy associated with it greatly influence us in many ways, we have to ask: Has this shielding of the body noticeably impacted the human organism? Although there is a large body of literature on light therapy, the question remains unanswered due to conflicting results and the lack of standardization in experimental methods. In fact, many studies face criticism for having inadequate data. For centuries, light has been thought to affect physiological processes and the mind. However, most of the early applications lacked scientific evidence. Unfortunately, many of the claims about the physiological and psychological effects of light today are inconsistent and do not rest on established scientific foundations. Moreover, some contradict what is possible, leading an unbiased observer to conclude that a lot of systematic work is needed before we can make sense of the current chaos. This doesn’t imply that many of the effects aren’t real, as radiant energy is known to produce certain effects. Looking at the subject from a broad perspective, it seems that light is already benefiting humanity in this area, and its future looks promising.
The present lack of definite data pertaining to the effects of radiation is due to the failure of most investigators to determine accurately the quantities and wave-lengths of the rays involved. For example, it is easy to err by attributing an effect to visible rays when the effect may be caused by accompanying invisible rays. Furthermore, it may be possible that certain rays counteract or aid the effective rays without being effective alone. In other words, the physical measurements have been neglected notwithstanding the fact that they are generally more easily made than the determinations of curative effects or of germicidal action. Radiant energy of all kinds and wave-lengths has played a part in therapeutics, so it is of interest to indicate them according to wave-length or frequency. These groups vary in range of wave-length, but the actual intervals are not particularly of interest here. Beginning with radiant energy of highest frequencies of vibration and shortest wave-lengths, the following groups and subgroups are given in their order of increasing wave-length:
The current lack of clear data on the effects of radiation is because most researchers haven’t accurately measured the amounts and wavelengths of the rays involved. For instance, it’s easy to mistakenly attribute an effect to visible rays when it might actually be caused by invisible rays that accompany them. Additionally, some rays might either cancel out or enhance the effective rays without being effective on their own. In other words, the physical measurements have been overlooked, even though they’re usually easier to obtain than assessments of therapeutic effects or germicidal action. Radiant energy of all types and wavelengths has played a role in therapy, so it’s worth noting them based on their wavelength or frequency. These groups vary in wavelength range, but the specific intervals aren’t particularly relevant here. Starting with radiant energy at the highest frequencies and shortest wavelengths, here are the following groups and subgroups listed in order of increasing wavelength:
Röntgen or X-rays, which pass readily through many substances opaque to ordinary light-rays.
X-rays, or Röntgen rays, can easily pass through many materials that block regular light.
Ultra-violet rays, which are divided empirically into three groups, designated as "extreme," "middle," and "near" in accordance with their location in respect to the visible region.
Ultraviolet rays are divided into three categories known as "extreme," "middle," and "near," based on their position in relation to the visible spectrum.
Visible rays producing various sensations of color, such as violet, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red.
Visible rays produce different colors, such as violet, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red.
An unknown, unmeasured, or unfilled region between the infra-red and the "electric" waves.
There is an unknown, unmeasured, or empty range between infrared and electric waves.
Electric waves, which include a class of electromagnetic radiant energy of long wave-length. Of these the Herzian waves are of the shortest wave-length and these are followed by "wireless" waves. Electric waves of still greater wave-length are due to the slower oscillations in certain electric circuits caused by lightning discharges, etc.
Electric waves include a type of electromagnetic radiation with long wavelengths. Of these, Herzian waves have the shortest wavelengths, followed by "wireless" waves. Electric waves with even longer wavelengths are created by slower oscillations in specific electric circuits, caused by lightning discharges and similar events.
The Röntgen rays were discovered by Röntgen in 1896 and they have been studied and applied very widely ever since. Their great use has been in X-ray photography, but they are also being used in therapeutics. The extreme ultra-violet rays are not available in sunlight and are available only near a source rich in ultra-violet rays, such as the arc-lamps. They are absorbed by air, so that they are studied in a vacuum. These are the rays which convert oxygen into ozone because the former strongly absorbs them. The middle ultra-violet rays are not found in sunlight, because they are absorbed by the atmosphere. They are also absorbed by ordinary glass but are freely transmitted by quartz. The nearer ultra-violet rays are found in sunlight and in most artificial illuminants and are transmitted by ordinary glass. Next to this region is the visible spectrum with the various colors, from violet to red, induced by radiant energy of increasing wave-length. The infra-red rays are sometimes called heat-rays, but all radiant energy may be converted into heat. Various substances transmit and absorb these rays in general quite differently from the visible rays. Water is opaque to most of the infra-red rays. Next there is a region of wave-lengths or frequencies for which no radiant energy has been found. The so-called electric waves vary in wave-length over a great range and they include those employed in wireless telegraphy. All these radiations are of the same general character, consisting of electromagnetic energy, but differing in wave-length or frequency of vibration and also in their effects. In effect they may overlap in many cases and the whole is a chaos if the physical details of quantity and wave-length are not specified in experimental work.
The Röntgen rays were discovered by Röntgen in 1896 and have been widely studied and used ever since. Their primary application has been in X-ray photography, but they are also used in therapy. The extreme ultraviolet rays aren’t found in sunlight and are only available near sources rich in ultraviolet light, like arc lamps. They get absorbed by air, so they’re studied in a vacuum. These rays convert oxygen into ozone because oxygen absorbs them strongly. The middle ultraviolet rays aren’t present in sunlight because the atmosphere absorbs them. They’re also absorbed by regular glass but pass easily through quartz. The near ultraviolet rays are found in sunlight and in most artificial lights and can pass through regular glass. Following this region is the visible spectrum, with various colors ranging from violet to red, caused by radiant energy of increasing wavelength. The infrared rays are sometimes called heat rays, but all radiant energy can be converted into heat. Different substances transmit and absorb these rays quite differently from visible rays. Water is opaque to most of the infrared rays. After this, there’s a range of wavelengths or frequencies where no radiant energy has been identified. The so-called electric waves vary greatly in wavelength and include those used in wireless telegraphy. All these radiations share the same general characteristics, consisting of electromagnetic energy, but differ in wavelength or frequency of vibration and their effects. They can overlap in many cases, and without specifying the physical details of quantity and wavelength in experimental work, the whole becomes chaotic.
JUDGING COLOR UNDER ARTIFICIAL DAYLIGHT
JUDGING COLOR UNDER FAKE LIGHT
It has been conclusively shown that radiant energy kills bacteria. The early experiments were made with sunlight and the destruction of micro-organisms is generally attributed to the so-called chemical rays, namely, the blue, violet, and ultra-violet rays. It appears in general that the middle ultra-violet rays are the most powerful destroyers. It is certainly established that sunlight sterilizes water, for example, and the quartz mercury-lamp is in daily use for this purpose on a practicable scale. However, there still appears to be a difference of opinion as to the destructive effect of radiant energy upon bacteria in living tissue. It has been shown that the middle ultra-violet rays destroy animal tissue and, for example, cause eye-cataracts. It appears possible from some experiments that ultra-violet rays destroy bacteria in water and on culture plates more effectively in the absence of visible rays than when these attend the ultra-violet rays as in the case of sunlight. This is one of the reasons for the use of blue glass in light-therapy, which isolates the blue, violet, and near ultra-violet rays from the other visible rays. If the infra-red rays are not desired they can be readily eliminated by the use of a water-cell.
It has been clearly shown that radiant energy kills bacteria. The initial experiments were conducted with sunlight, and the destruction of micro-organisms is generally attributed to what are known as chemical rays, specifically the blue, violet, and ultraviolet rays. It seems that, overall, the mid-ultraviolet rays are the most effective at destruction. It’s well established that sunlight can sterilize water, for instance, and quartz mercury lamps are commonly used for this purpose on a practical scale. However, there still appears to be differing opinions regarding the harmful effects of radiant energy on bacteria in living tissue. It has been demonstrated that mid-ultraviolet rays can destroy animal tissue and, for example, lead to cataracts. Some experiments suggest that ultraviolet rays may kill bacteria in water and on culture plates more effectively when visible rays are absent, compared to when they accompany ultraviolet rays, as in the case of sunlight. This is one of the reasons for using blue glass in light therapy, which filters out the blue, violet, and near-ultraviolet rays from the other visible rays. If infrared rays are not desired, they can easily be removed using a water cell.
ARTIFICIAL DAYLIGHT
Artificial Light
There is a vast amount of testimony which proves the bactericidal action of light. Bacteria on the surface of the body are destroyed by ultra-violet rays. Typhus and tubercle bacilli are destroyed equally well by the direct rays from the sun and from the electric arcs. Cultures of diphtheria develop in diffused daylight but are destroyed by direct sunlight. Lower organisms in water are readily killed by the radiation from any light-source emitting ultra-violet rays comparable with those in direct sunlight. From the great amount of data available it appears reasonable to conclude that radiant energy is a powerful bactericidal agency but that the action is due chiefly to ultra-violet rays. It appears also that no bacteria can resist these rays if they are intense enough and are permitted to play upon the bacteria long enough. The destruction of these organisms appears to be a phenomenon of oxidation, for the presence of oxygen appears to be necessary.
There is a lot of evidence showing that light has a germ-killing effect. Bacteria on the skin are eliminated by ultraviolet rays. Typhus and tuberculosis bacteria are equally destroyed by direct sunlight and electric arcs. Diphtheria cultures can grow in diffused daylight but are killed by direct sunlight. Lower organisms in water are easily killed by radiation from any light source that emits ultraviolet rays similar to those in direct sunlight. Based on the extensive data available, it seems reasonable to conclude that radiant energy is a powerful bactericidal agent, mainly due to ultraviolet rays. It also appears that no bacteria can withstand these rays if they are strong enough and have enough exposure time. The destruction of these organisms seems to be tied to oxidation, as the presence of oxygen appears to be necessary.
The foregoing remarks about the bactericidal action of radiant energy apply only to bacteria in water, in cultures, and on the surface of the body. There is much uncertainty as to the ability of radiant energy to destroy bacteria within living tissue. The active rays cannot penetrate appreciably into such tissue and many authorities are convinced that no direct destruction takes place. In fact, it has been stated that the so-called chemical rays are more destructive to the tissue cells than to bacteria. Finsen, a pioneer in the use of radiant energy in the treatment of disease, effected many wonderful cures and believed that the bacteria were directly destroyed by the ultra-violet rays. However, many have since come to the conclusion that the beneficent action of the rays is due to the irritation which causes an outflow of serum, thus bringing more antibodies in contact with the bacilli, and causing the destruction of the latter. Hot applications appear to work in the same manner.
The earlier comments about how radiant energy kills bacteria only apply to bacteria in water, in cultures, and on the skin. There's a lot of uncertainty about how well radiant energy can actually destroy bacteria inside living tissue. The active rays can't penetrate deeply into such tissue, and many experts believe that no direct destruction occurs. In fact, it has been said that the so-called chemical rays are more harmful to tissue cells than to bacteria. Finsen, an early innovator in using radiant energy for treating diseases, achieved many remarkable cures and thought that the ultra-violet rays directly killed the bacteria. However, many have since concluded that the positive effects of the rays come from the irritation they cause, which leads to an outflow of serum that brings more antibodies into contact with the bacteria, resulting in their destruction. Hot applications seem to work in a similar way.
Primitive beings of the tropics are known to treat open wounds by exposing them to the direct rays of the sun without dressings of any kind. These wounds are usually infected and the sun's rays render them aseptic and they heal readily. Many cases of sores and surgical wounds have been quickly healed by exposure to sunlight. Even red light has been effective, so it has been concluded by some that rays of almost any wave-length, if intense enough, will effect a cure of this character by causing an effusion of serum. It has also been stated that the chemical rays have anæsthetic powers and have been used in this rôle for many minor operations.
Primitive people in tropical areas are known to treat open wounds by exposing them to direct sunlight without any dressings. These wounds are often infected, and the sun's rays help make them clean, allowing them to heal quickly. Many cases of sores and surgical wounds have healed rapidly due to sunlight exposure. Even red light has been effective, leading some to conclude that rays of nearly any wavelength, if intense enough, can promote healing by causing a release of serum. It has also been reported that certain chemical rays have anesthetic properties and have been used for this purpose in minor procedures.
It is said that the Chinese have used red light for centuries in the treatment of smallpox and throughout the Middle Ages this practice was not uncommon. In the oldest book on medicine written in English there is an account of a successful treatment of the son of Edward I for smallpox by means of red light. It is also stated that this treatment was administered throughout the reigns of Elizabeth and of Charles II. Another account states that a few soldiers confined in dark dungeons recovered from smallpox without pitting. Finsen also obtained excellent results in the treatment of this disease by means of red light. However, in this case it appears that the exclusion of the so-called chemical rays favors healing of the postules of smallpox and that the use of red light is therefore a negative application of light-therapy. In other words, the red light plays no part except in furnishing a light which does not inhibit healing.
It is said that the Chinese have used red light for centuries to treat smallpox, and during the Middle Ages, this practice was quite common. In the earliest book on medicine written in English, there’s a record of a successful treatment for Edward I’s son, who had smallpox, using red light. This treatment was reportedly used during the reigns of Elizabeth and Charles II as well. Another account mentions that a few soldiers locked in dark dungeons recovered from smallpox without scarring. Finsen also achieved great results in the treatment of this disease using red light. However, it seems that avoiding the so-called chemical rays helps the healing of smallpox sores, meaning that using red light is a negative form of light therapy. In other words, the red light doesn’t play an active role other than providing a light that doesn’t hinder healing.
Although the so-called actinic rays have curative value in certain cases, there are some instances where light-baths are claimed to be harmful. It is said that sun-baths to the naked body are not so popular as they were formerly, except for obesity, gout, rheumatism, and sluggish metabolism, because it is felt that the shorter ultra-violet rays may be harmful. These rays are said to increase the pulse, respiration, temperature, and blood-pressure and may even start hemorrhages and in excessive amounts cause headache, palpitation, insomnia, and anemia. These same authorities condemn sun-baths to the naked body of the tuberculous, claiming that any cures effected are consummated despite the injury done by the energy of short wave-length. There is no doubt that these rays are beneficial in local lesions, but it is believed that the cure is due to the irritation caused by the rays and the consequent bactericidal action of the increased flow of serum, and not to any direct beneficial result on the tissue-cells. Others claim to cure tuberculosis by means of powerful quartz mercury-arcs equipped with a glass which absorbs the ultra-violet rays of shorter wave-lengths. These conclusions by a few authorities are submitted for what they are worth and to show that this phase of light-therapy is also unsettled.
Although actinic rays have healing properties in some cases, there are instances where light baths are believed to be harmful. It's said that sunbathing nude isn't as popular as it used to be, except for treating obesity, gout, rheumatism, and sluggish metabolism, because people believe that shorter ultraviolet rays might be harmful. These rays are said to raise heart rate, breathing, body temperature, and blood pressure, and they might even trigger hemorrhages. In excessive amounts, they can cause headaches, heart palpitations, insomnia, and anemia. Experts also discourage nude sunbathing for those with tuberculosis, arguing that any benefits are overshadowed by the harm caused by the energy of short wavelengths. While it's clear that these rays can be helpful for local conditions, many believe the healing is due to the irritation they cause and the resulting bactericidal effect from increased serum flow, rather than any direct positive impact on tissue cells. Others argue they can treat tuberculosis using powerful quartz mercury-arc lamps fitted with glass that filters out shorter ultraviolet wavelengths. These findings from a few experts are presented for what they are worth, highlighting that this area of light therapy is still unclear.
Any one who has been in touch with light-therapy in a scientific rôle is bound to note that much ignorance is displayed in the use of light in this manner. In fact, it appears safe to state that light-therapy often smacks of quackery. Very mysterious effects are sometimes attributed to radiant energy, which occasionally border upon superstition. Nevertheless, this kind of energy has value, and notwithstanding the chaos which still exists, it is of interest to note some of the equipment which has been used. Some practitioners have great confidence in the electric bath, and elaborate light-baths have been devised. In the earlier years of this kind of treatment the electric arc was conspicuous. Electrodes of carbon, carbon and iron, and iron have been used when intense ultra-violet rays were desired. The quartz mercury-arc of later years supplies this need admirably. Dr. Cleaves, after many years of experience with the electric-arc bath, has stated:
Anyone who has worked with light therapy in a scientific role is bound to notice that there’s a lot of ignorance surrounding its use. In fact, it’s fair to say that light therapy often feels a bit like quackery. Sometimes, very mysterious effects are attributed to radiant energy, which can even approach the realm of superstition. However, this type of energy does have value, and despite the ongoing confusion, it’s worth mentioning some of the equipment that has been used. Some practitioners have a lot of faith in the electric bath, and complex light baths have been developed. In the earlier years of this treatment, the electric arc was quite prominent. Electrodes made of carbon, a mix of carbon and iron, and iron have been used when strong ultraviolet rays were needed. The quartz mercury-arc of later years fulfills this requirement excellently. Dr. Cleaves, after many years of experience with the electric-arc bath, has stated:
From the administration of an electric-arc bath there is obtained an action upon the skin, the patient experiences a pleasant and slightly prickly sensation. There is produced, even from a short exposure, upon the skin of some patients a slight erythema, while with others there is but little such effect even from long exposures. The face assumes a normal rosy coloring and an appearance of refreshment and repose on emerging from the bath is always observed. From the administration of the electric-arc bath there is also noted the establishment of circulatory changes with a uniform regulation of the heart's action, as evidenced by improved volume and slower pulse rate, the augmentation of the temperature, increased activity of the skin, fuller and slower respiration, gradually increased respiratory capacity, and diminished irritability of the mucous membrane in tubercular, bronchitic, or asthmatic patients. There is also lessened discharge in those patients suffering from catarrhal conditions of the nasal passages. In diseases of the respiratory system, a soothing effect upon the mucous membranes is always experienced, while cough and expectoration are diminished.
Using an electric-arc bath affects the skin, and patients experience a pleasant, slightly tingling sensation. Even a brief exposure can cause mild redness on the skin for some patients, while others may show little effect even after longer sessions. The face often takes on a healthy rosy color, and a look of refreshment and relaxation is always noticeable after leaving the bath. The electric-arc bath also induces changes in circulation, leading to consistent regulation of heart activity, evident through improved volume and a slower pulse rate, increased temperature, enhanced skin activity, deeper and slower breathing, gradually improved lung capacity, and reduced sensitivity of the mucous membranes in patients with tuberculosis, bronchitis, or asthma. There's also less discharge for those experiencing nasal congestion. In respiratory illnesses, a calming effect on the mucous membranes is consistently felt, while cough and phlegm production decrease.
The cabinet used by Dr. Cleaves was large enough to contain a cot upon which the patient reclined. An arc-lamp was suspended at each of the two ends of the cabinet and a flood of light was obtained directly and by reflection from the white inside surfaces of the cabinet. By means of mirrors the light from the arcs could be concentrated upon any desired part of the patient.
The cabinet used by Dr. Cleaves was spacious enough to hold a cot where the patient lay down. There was an arc lamp hanging at each end of the cabinet, providing plenty of light directly and through reflections from the white interior surfaces. Mirrors were used to focus the arc light on any specific area of the patient.
Finsen, who in 1895 published his observations upon the stimulating action of light, is considered the pioneer in the use of so-called chemical rays in the treatment of disease. He had a circular room about thirty-seven feet in diameter, in which two powerful 100-ampere arc-lamps about six feet from the floor were suspended from the ceiling. Low partitions extended radially from the center, so that a number of patients could be treated simultaneously. The temperature of the room was normal, so that the treatment was essentially by radiant energy and not by heat. The chemical action upon the skin was said to be quite as strong as under sunlight. The exposures varied from ten minutes to an hour.
Finsen, who published his observations on the stimulating effects of light in 1895, is considered a pioneer in using so-called chemical rays to treat diseases. He had a circular room about thirty-seven feet in diameter, where two powerful 100-ampere arc lamps were suspended from the ceiling about six feet off the ground. Low partitions extended radially from the center, allowing multiple patients to be treated at the same time. The room temperature was normal, meaning the treatment relied on radiant energy rather than heat. The chemical effect on the skin was said to be just as strong as that of sunlight. Treatment sessions varied from ten minutes to an hour.
Light-baths containing incandescent filament lamps are also used. In some cases the lamp, sometimes having a blue bulb, is merely contained as a reflector and the light is applied locally as desired. Light-cabinets are also used, but in these there is considerable effect due to heat. The ultra-violet rays emitted by the small electric filament lamps used in these cabinets are of very low intensity and the bactericidal action of the light must be feeble. The glass bulbs do not transmit the extreme ultra-violet rays responsible for the production of ozone, or the middle ultra-violet rays which are effective in destroying animal tissue. The cabinets contain from twenty to one hundred incandescent filament lamps of the ordinary sizes, from 25 to 60 watts. In the days of the carbon filament lamp the 16-candle-power lamp was used. Certainly the heating effect has advantages in some cases over other methods of heating. The light-rays penetrate the tissue and are absorbed and transformed into heat. Other methods involve conduction of heat from the hot air or other hot applications. Of course, it is also contended that the light-rays are directly beneficial.
Light-baths using incandescent filament lamps are also common. Sometimes, the lamp, which might have a blue bulb, is just used as a reflector, and the light is applied locally as needed. Light cabinets are also utilized, but these produce significant heat. The ultraviolet rays emitted by the small electric filament lamps in these cabinets are of very low intensity, meaning the bactericidal effect of the light is weak. The glass bulbs do not allow the extreme ultraviolet rays responsible for creating ozone or the middle ultraviolet rays, which effectively destroy animal tissue. The cabinets can hold anywhere from twenty to one hundred standard incandescent filament lamps, typically between 25 to 60 watts. In the era of the carbon filament lamp, a 16-candle-power lamp was commonly used. The heating effect can have advantages over other heating methods in some situations. The light rays penetrate the tissue and are converted into heat. Other methods rely on heat conduction from hot air or other heated applications. It's also argued that the light rays themselves provide direct benefits.
Light is also concentrated upon the body by means of lenses and mirrors. For this purpose the sun, the arc, the quartz mercury-arc, and the incandescent lamp have been used. Besides these, vacuum-tube discharges and sparks have been utilized as sources for radiant energy and "electrical" treatment. Röntgen rays and radium have also figured in recent years in the treatment of disease.
Light is also focused on the body using lenses and mirrors. To do this, we've used the sun, arc lamps, quartz mercury-arc lamps, and incandescent bulbs. In addition to these, vacuum-tube discharges and sparks have been used as sources for radiant energy and "electrical" treatments. In recent years, X-rays and radium have also played a role in disease treatment.
The quartz mercury-arc has been extensively used in the past decade for the treatment of skin diseases and there appears to be less uncertainty about the efficacy of radiant energy for the treatment of surface diseases than of others. Herod related that the Egyptians treated patients by exposure to direct sunlight and throughout the centuries and among all types of civilization sunlight has been recognized as having certain valuable healing or purifying properties. Finsen in his early experiments cured a case of lupus, a tuberculous skin disease, by means of the visible and near ultra-violet rays in sunlight. He demonstrated that these were the effective rays by using only the radiant energy which passed through a water-cell made by using a convex lens for each end of the cell and filling the intervening space with water. This was really a lens made of glass and water. The glass absorbed the ultra-violet rays of shorter wave-length and the water absorbed the infra-red rays. Thus he was able to concentrate upon the diseased skin radiant energy consisting of visible and near ultra-violet rays.
The quartz mercury-arc has been widely used over the past decade for treating skin diseases, and there seems to be less doubt about the effectiveness of radiant energy for treating surface conditions compared to others. Herod mentioned that the Egyptians treated patients by exposing them to direct sunlight, and throughout history and across various civilizations, sunlight has been acknowledged for its valuable healing or purifying properties. Finsen, in his early experiments, successfully treated a case of lupus, a tuberculous skin disease, using the visible and near-ultraviolet rays from sunlight. He proved these rays were effective by using only the radiant energy that passed through a water-cell, created with a convex lens on each end of the cell and filled with water in between. This was essentially a lens made of glass and water. The glass absorbed the shorter wavelength ultraviolet rays, while the water absorbed the infrared rays. Therefore, he could focus the radiant energy, consisting of visible and near-ultraviolet rays, on the diseased skin.
The encouraging results which Finsen obtained in the treatment of skin diseases led him to become independent of sunlight by equipping a special arc-lamp with quartz lenses. This gave him a powerful source of so-called chemical rays, which could be concentrated wherever desired. However, when science contributed the mercury-vapor arc, developments were immediately begun which aimed to utilize this artificial source of steady powerful ultra-violet rays in light-therapy. As a consequence, there are now available very compact quartz mercury-arcs designed especially for this purpose. Apparently their use has been very effective in curing many skin diseases. Certainly if radiant energy is effective, it has a great advantage over drugs. An authority has stated in regard to skin diseases that,
The positive results that Finsen achieved in treating skin diseases led him to create a way to operate independently of sunlight by using a special arc lamp fitted with quartz lenses. This provided him with a strong source of so-called chemical rays that could be focused wherever needed. However, when science introduced the mercury-vapor arc, efforts quickly began to harness this artificial source of consistent, powerful ultraviolet rays for light therapy. As a result, there are now very compact quartz mercury arcs specifically designed for this purpose. Their use has proven to be very effective in treating many skin diseases. Clearly, if radiant energy is effective, it has a significant advantage over medications. An expert has remarked about skin diseases that,
treatment with the ultra-violet rays, especially in conjunction with the Röntgen rays, radium and mesothorium is that treatment which in most instances holds rank as the first, and in many as the only and often enough the most effective mode of handling the disease.
Treatment with ultraviolet rays, especially when used alongside X-rays, radium, and mesothorium, is generally seen as the best choice and often the only effective method for managing the disease.
Sterilization by means of the radiation from the quartz mercury-arc has been practised successfully for several years. Compact apparatus is in use for the sterilization of water for drinking, for surgical purposes, and for swimming-pools, and the claims made by the manufacturers of the apparatus apparently are substantiated. One type of apparatus withstands a pressure of one hundred pounds per square inch and may be connected in series with the water-main. The water supplied to the sterilizer should be clear and free of suspended matter, in order that the radiant energy may be effective. Such apparatus is capable of sterilizing any quantity of water up to a thousand gallons an hour, and the lamp is kept burning only when the water is flowing. It is especially useful in hotels, stores, factories, on ships, and in many industries where sterile water is needed.
Sterilization using radiation from quartz mercury-arc technology has been successfully implemented for several years. Compact devices are used to sterilize drinking water, surgical instruments, and swimming pools, and the claims made by the manufacturers of these devices seem to be verified. One type of device can handle a pressure of one hundred pounds per square inch and can be connected in a series with the water supply. The water sent to the sterilizer must be clear and free of any suspended particles so that the radiant energy can work effectively. This equipment can sterilize any amount of water up to a thousand gallons per hour, and the lamp operates only when water is flowing. It's particularly beneficial in hotels, stores, factories, on ships, and in many industries where sterile water is required.
Water is a vital necessity in every-day life, whether for drinking, cooking, or industrial purposes. It is recognized as a carrier of disease and the purification of water-supply in large cities is an important problem. Chlorination processes are in use which render the treated water disagreeable to the taste and filtration alone is looked upon with suspicion. The use of chemicals requires constant analysis, but it is contended that the bactericidal action of ultra-violet rays is so certain and complete that there is never any doubt as to the sterilization of the water if it is clear, or if it has been properly filtered before treating. The system of sterilization by ultra-violet rays is the natural way, for the sun's rays perform this function in nature. Apparatus for sterilization of water by means of ultra-violet rays is built for public plants in capacities up to ten million gallons per day and these units may be multiplied to meet the needs of the largest cities. Large mechanical filters are used in conjunction with these sterilizers, and thus mankind copies nature's way, for natural supplies of pure water have been filtered through sand and have been exposed to the rays of the sun which free it from germ life.
Water is essential for daily life, whether it's for drinking, cooking, or industrial use. It's known as a carrier of disease, and purifying water supplies in big cities is a significant issue. Chlorination methods are used, but they can make the treated water taste unpleasant, and filtration is often viewed with skepticism. The use of chemicals requires ongoing testing, but it's argued that the germ-killing effects of ultraviolet rays are so reliable and thorough that there's never any doubt about the sterilization of water if it's clear or properly filtered beforehand. The method of sterilizing water with ultraviolet rays is natural, as sunlight does this in nature. Equipment for sterilizing water using ultraviolet rays is built for public facilities with capacities up to ten million gallons per day, and these systems can be scaled up to meet the demands of the largest cities. Large mechanical filters work alongside these sterilizers, mimicking nature's method, since natural sources of pure water have been filtered through sand and exposed to sunlight, which eliminates germs.
Some sterilizers of this character are used at the place where a supply of pure water is desired or at a point where water is bottled for use in various parts of a factory, hospital, store, or office building. These were used in some American hospitals during the recent war, where they supplied sterilized water for drinking and for the antiseptic bathing of wounds. In warfare the water supply is exceedingly important. For example, the Japanese in their campaign in Manchuria boiled the water to be used for drinking purposes. The mortality of armies in many previous wars was often much greater from preventable diseases than from bullets, but the Japanese in their war with Russia reversed the mortality statistics. Of a total mortality of 81,000 more than 60,000 died of casualties in battle.
Some sterilizers like these are used where there's a need for pure water or at locations where water is bottled for use in various areas of a factory, hospital, store, or office building. They were used in some American hospitals during the recent war, providing sterilized water for drinking and for antiseptic cleaning of wounds. A reliable water supply is crucial in warfare. For instance, during their campaign in Manchuria, the Japanese boiled water for drinking. In many past wars, the death toll from preventable diseases often exceeded that from gunfire, but during the war between Japan and Russia, the mortality statistics were reversed. Out of a total death toll of 81,000, more than 60,000 died from battle injuries.
The sterilization of water for swimming-pools is coming into vogue. Heretofore it was the common practice to circulate the water through a filter, in order to remove the impurities imparted to it by the bathers and to return it to the pool. It is insisted by the adherents of sterilization that filtration of this sort is likely to leave harmful bacteria in the water. Sterilizers in which ultra-violet rays are the active rays are now in use for this purpose, being connected beyond the outflow from the filter. The effectiveness of the apparatus has been established by the usual method of counting the bacteria. Near the outlet of the ordinary filter a count revealed many thousand bacteria per cubic inch of water and among these there were bacteria of intestinal origin. Then a sterilizer was installed in which the effective elements were two quartz mercury-lamps which consumed 2.2 amperes each at 220 volts. A count of bacteria in the water leaving the sterilizer showed that these organisms had been reduced to 5 per cent. and finally to a smaller percentage of their original value, and that all those of intestinal origin had been destroyed. In fact, the water which was returned to the pool was better than that which most persons drink. Radiant energy possesses advantages which are unequaled by other bactericidal agents, in that it does not contaminate or change the properties of the water in any way. It does its work of destroying bacteria and leaves the water otherwise unchanged.
The sterilization of swimming pool water is becoming popular. Previously, the usual method was to circulate the water through a filter to remove the impurities introduced by swimmers and send it back to the pool. Supporters of sterilization argue that this type of filtration often fails to eliminate harmful bacteria from the water. Now, sterilizers using ultra-violet rays are being used for this purpose, positioned beyond the filter's outflow. The effectiveness of this equipment has been confirmed by the standard method of counting bacteria. Near the outlet of a regular filter, tests showed many thousands of bacteria per cubic inch of water, including some from intestinal sources. Then, a sterilizer was installed that used two quartz mercury lamps, each consuming 2.2 amperes at 220 volts. Tests on the water exiting the sterilizer indicated that bacteria levels were reduced to 5 percent and ultimately to an even smaller percentage of their original count, with all intestinal bacteria eliminated. In fact, the water returned to the pool was cleaner than what most people drink. Radiant energy has unmatched advantages over other bactericidal methods, as it doesn’t contaminate or alter the water's properties in any way. It effectively kills bacteria while keeping the water unchanged.
These glimpses of the use of the radiant energy as a means of regaining and retaining good health suggest greater possibilities when the facts become thoroughly established and correlated. The sun is of primary importance to mankind, but it serves in so many ways that it is naturally a compromise. It cannot supply just the desired radiant energy for one purpose and at the same time serve for another purpose in the best manner. It is obscured on cloudy days and disappears nightly. These absences are beneficial to some processes, but man in the highly organized activity of present civilization desires radiant energy of various qualities available at any time. In this respect artificial light is superior to the sun and is being improved continually.
These glimpses of using radiant energy to regain and maintain good health suggest even greater possibilities once the facts are fully established and connected. The sun is crucial for humanity, but it fulfills many roles, making it a compromise. It can't provide just the right radiant energy for one purpose while also being perfect for another. It's blocked on cloudy days and goes away at night. While these absences can help certain processes, people in today's highly organized society want radiant energy of different qualities available whenever they need it. In this way, artificial light is better than the sun and is constantly getting better.
XXI
MODIFYING ARTIFICIAL LIGHT
In a single century science has converted the dimly lighted nights with their feeble flickering flames into artificial daytime. In this brief span of years the production of light has advanced far from the primitive flames in use at the beginning of the nineteenth century, but, as has been noted in another chapter, great improvements in light-production are still possible. Nevertheless, the wonderful developments in the last four decades, which created the arc-lamps, the gas-mantle, the mercury-vapor lamps, and the series of electric incandescent-filament lamps, have contributed much to the efficiency, safety, health, and happiness of mankind.
In just a hundred years, science has transformed dark nights filled with weak flickering flames into artificial daylight. In this short period, the way we produce light has progressed significantly from the basic flames used at the start of the nineteenth century. However, as mentioned in another chapter, there are still many potential improvements in light production. Still, the amazing advancements made in the last forty years—like the creation of arc lamps, gas mantles, mercury vapor lamps, and various types of electric incandescent filament lamps—have greatly enhanced the efficiency, safety, health, and happiness of people.
A hundred years ago civilization was more easily satisfied and an improvement which furnished more light at the same cost was all that could be desired. To-day light alone is not sufficient. Certain kinds of radiant energy are required for photography and other photochemical processes and a vast array of colored light is demanded for displays and for effects upon the stage. Man now desires lights of various colors for their expressive effects. He is no longer satisfied with mere light in adequate quantities; he desires certain qualities. Furthermore, he no longer finds it sufficient to be independent of daylight merely in quantity of light. In fact, he has demanded artificial daylight.
A hundred years ago, society was more easily pleased, and all that was needed was an improvement that provided more light at the same cost. Today, just having light isn't enough. Certain types of light energy are needed for photography and other light-based processes, and there's a huge demand for various colored lights for displays and stage effects. People now want lights in different colors for their expressive qualities. They're no longer satisfied with just having enough light; they want specific qualities. Moreover, it's not enough to simply have artificial light that matches the amount of daylight. In fact, there's a demand for artificial daylight itself.
Doubtless the future will see the production of efficient light of many qualities or colors, but to-day many of the demands must be met by modifying the artificial illuminants which are available. Vision is accomplished entirely by the distinction of brightness and color. An image of any scene or any object is focused upon the retina as a miniature map in light, shade, and color. Although the distinction of brightness is a more important function in vision than the ability to distinguish colors, color-vision is far more important in daily life than is ordinarily appreciated. One may go through life color-blind without suffering any great inconvenience, but the divine gift of color-vision casts a magical drapery over all creation. Relatively few are conscious of the wonderful drapery of color, except for occasional moments when the display is unusual. Nevertheless a study of vision in nearly all crafts reveals the fact that the distinction of colors plays an important part.
Undoubtedly, the future will bring efficient light in various qualities and colors, but today many of the needs must be addressed by adjusting the artificial light sources we have. Vision relies entirely on distinguishing brightness and color. An image of any scene or object is projected onto the retina as a small map of light, shadow, and color. While distinguishing brightness is more critical to vision than recognizing colors, color vision is much more significant in daily life than most people realize. One can live with color blindness without major issues, but the extraordinary gift of color vision adds a magical quality to everything around us. Few are aware of the beautiful range of colors, except during rare moments when the display is extraordinary. Nonetheless, a study of vision in nearly all crafts shows that recognizing colors plays an essential role.
In the purchase of food and wearing-apparel, in the decoration of homes and throughout the arts and industries, mankind depends a great deal upon the appearance of colors. He depends upon daylight in this respect and unconsciously often, when daylight fails, ceases work which depends upon the accurate distinction of colors. His color-vision evolved under daylight; arts and industries developed under daylight; and all his associations of color are based primarily upon daylight. For these reasons, adequate artificial illumination does not make mankind independent of daylight in the practice of arts and crafts and in many minor activities. In quality or spectral character, the unmodified illuminants used for general lighting purposes differ from daylight and therefore do not fully replace it. Noon sunlight contains all the spectral colors in approximately the same proportions, but this is not true of these artificial illuminants. For these reasons there is a demand for artificial daylight.
In buying food and clothing, decorating homes, and throughout various arts and industries, people rely heavily on how colors look. They depend on natural light for this, and often without realizing it, when daylight disappears, they stop working on tasks that require precise color distinction. Human color vision developed in natural light; arts and industries evolved in daylight; and all color associations are mainly rooted in it. Because of this, adequate artificial lighting doesn’t allow people to become completely independent of daylight in artistic and craft-related activities and many everyday tasks. The quality or spectral characteristics of the unmodified lights used for general lighting differ from natural light, so they cannot fully replace it. Noon sunlight includes all spectral colors in roughly equal amounts, but this isn’t the case with artificial lights. For these reasons, there is a demand for artificial daylight.
The "vacuum" tube affords a possibility of an extensive variety of illuminants differing widely in spectral character or color. Every gas when excited to luminescence by an electric discharge in the "vacuum" tube (containing the gas at a low pressure) emits light of a characteristic quality or color. By varying the gas a variety of illuminants can be obtained, but this means of light-production has not been developed to a sufficiently practicable state to be satisfactory for general lighting. Nitrogen yields a pinkish light and the nitrogen tube as developed by Dr. Moore was installed to some extent a few years ago. Neon yields an orange light and has been used in a few cases for displays. Carbon dioxide furnishes a white light similar to daylight and small tubes containing this gas are in use to-day where accurate discrimination of color is essential.
The "vacuum" tube allows for a wide range of light sources that vary greatly in color and spectral characteristics. When any gas is excited to emit light through an electric discharge in the "vacuum" tube (which holds the gas at low pressure), it produces light in a specific quality or color. By changing the gas, different types of light can be created, but this method of producing light hasn't been developed enough to be practical for general use. Nitrogen gives off a pinkish light, and the nitrogen tube created by Dr. Moore was somewhat used a few years ago. Neon produces an orange light and has been used in some display cases. Carbon dioxide provides a white light similar to daylight, and small tubes with this gas are currently used where accurate color distinction is important.
The flame-arcs afford a means of obtaining a variety of illuminants differing in spectral character or color. By impregnating the carbons with various chemical compounds the color of the flame can be widely altered. The white flame-arc obtained by the use of rare-earth compounds in the carbons provides an illuminant closely approximating average daylight. By using various substances besides carbon for the electrodes, illuminants differing in spectral character can be obtained. These are usually rich in ultra-violet rays and therefore have their best applications in processes demanding this kind of radiant energy. The arc-lamp is limited in its application by its unsteadiness, its bulkiness, and the impracticability of subdividing it into light-sources of a great range of luminous intensities.
The flame-arcs provide a way to create different types of lights with various colors and spectral qualities. By treating the carbons with different chemical compounds, the color of the flame can be significantly changed. The white flame-arc created by using rare-earth compounds in the carbons produces a light that closely resembles natural daylight. By using different materials in addition to carbon for the electrodes, lights with varying spectral qualities can be achieved. These are typically rich in ultraviolet rays, making them ideal for processes that require this kind of energy. However, the arc lamp has limitations due to its instability, bulkiness, and the difficulty of breaking it down into sources of light with a wide range of intensities.
The most extensive applications of artificial daylight have been made by means of the electric incandescent filament lamp, equipped with a colored glass which alters the light to the same quality as daylight. The light from the electric filament lamp is richer in yellow, orange, and red rays than daylight, and by knowing the spectral character of the two illuminants and the spectral characteristics of colored glasses in which various chemicals have been incorporated, it is possible to develop a colored glass which will filter out of the excess of yellow, orange, and red rays so that the transmitted light is of the same spectral character as daylight. Thousands of such artificial daylight units are now in use in the industries, in stores, in laboratories, in dye-works, in print-shops, and in many other places. Currency and Liberty Bonds have been made under artificial daylight and such units are in use in banks for the detection of counterfeit currency. The diamond expert detects the color of jewels and the microscopist is certain of the colors of his stains under artificial daylight. The dyer mixes his dyes for the coloring of tons of valuable silk and the artist paints under this artificial light. These are only a few of a vast number of applications of artificial daylight, but they illustrate that mankind is independent of natural light in another respect.
The most extensive uses of artificial daylight have been achieved through electric incandescent filament lamps, which are fitted with colored glass that changes the light to match the quality of daylight. The light from these lamps is richer in yellow, orange, and red tones compared to natural daylight. By understanding the spectral properties of both light sources and the characteristics of colored glasses made with various chemicals, it’s possible to create a colored glass that filters out the excess yellow, orange, and red rays, resulting in transmitted light that mimics daylight. Thousands of these artificial daylight units are currently used in industries, stores, laboratories, dye works, print shops, and many other locations. Currency and Liberty Bonds have been produced under this artificial light, and such units are used in banks to detect counterfeit money. Diamond experts assess jewel colors, and microscopists can accurately identify stain colors under artificial daylight. Dyers mix their dyes for coloring valuable silk, and artists paint under this artificial light. These are only a few examples among countless applications of artificial daylight, demonstrating that humanity can thrive independently of natural light in this way.
FIREWORKS AND ILLUMINATED BATTLE-FLEET AT HUDSON-FULTON CELEBRATION
FIREWORKS AND ILLUMINATED BATTLE FLEET AT HUDSON-FULTON CELEBRATION
There are various kinds of daylight, two of which are fairly constant in spectral character. These are noon sunlight and north skylight. The former may be said to be white light and its spectrum indicates the presence of visible radiant energy of all wave-lengths in approximately equal proportions. North skylight contains an excess of violet, blue, and blue-green rays and as a consequence is a bluish white. Noon sunlight on a clear day is fairly constant in spectral character, but north skylight varies somewhat depending upon the absence or presence of clouds and upon the character of the clouds. If large areas of sunlit clouds are present, the light is largely reflected sunlight. If the sky is overcast, the north skylight is a result of a mixture of sunlight and blue skylight filtered through the clouds and is slightly bluish. If the sky is clear, the light varies from light blue to deep blue.
There are different types of daylight, two of which are pretty consistent in their color spectrum. These are noon sunlight and north skylight. The former can be considered white light, and its spectrum shows that it contains visible radiant energy of all wavelengths in roughly equal amounts. North skylight has more violet, blue, and blue-green rays, making it appear bluish white. Noon sunlight on a clear day is quite stable in its spectral character, but north skylight changes a bit based on whether there are clouds and what type they are. If there are large areas of sunlit clouds, the light mostly consists of reflected sunlight. If the sky is overcast, north skylight comes from a mix of sunlight and blue skylight that filters through the clouds, giving it a slightly bluish tint. On a clear day, the light shifts from light blue to deep blue.

FIREWORKS EXHIBITION ON MAY DAY AT PANAMA-PACIFIC EXPOSITION
FIREWORKS SHOW ON MAY DAY AT PANAMA-PACIFIC EXPOSITION
The daylight which enters buildings is often considerably altered in color by reflection from other buildings and from vegetation, and after it enters a room it is sometimes modified by reflection from colored surroundings. It may be commonly noted that the light reflected from green grass through a window to the upper part of a room is very much tinted with green and the light reflected from a yellow brick building is tinted yellow. Besides these alterations, sunlight varies in color from the yellow or red of dawn through white at noon to orange or red at sunset. Throughout the day the amount of light from the sky does not change nearly as much as the amount of sunlight, so there is a continual variation in the proportion of direct sunlight and skylight reaching the earth. This is further varied by the changing position of the sun. For example, at a north window in which the direct sunlight may not enter throughout the day, the amount of sunlight which enters by reflection from adjacent buildings and other objects may vary greatly. Thus it is seen that daylight not only varies in quantity but also in quality, and an artificial daylight, which is based upon an extensive analysis, has the advantage of being constant in quantity and quality as well as correct in quality. Modern artificial-daylight units which have been scientifically developed not only make mankind independent of daylight in the discrimination of colors but they are superior to daylight.
The daylight that comes into buildings is often significantly changed in color by reflections from other buildings and plants, and once it enters a room, it can be further altered by bouncing off colored surroundings. It's commonly observed that the light reflected from green grass through a window to the upper part of a room carries a green tint, while the light reflected from a yellow brick building has a yellow hue. In addition to these changes, sunlight shifts in color from the yellow or red of dawn, to white at noon, to orange or red at sunset. Throughout the day, the amount of light from the sky doesn't change nearly as much as the amount of sunlight, leading to a continuous variation in the ratio of direct sunlight to skylight reaching the earth. This ratio also shifts with the sun’s changing position. For instance, at a north-facing window where direct sunlight might not come in all day, the amount of sunlight that enters through reflections from nearby buildings and other objects can vary widely. Thus, it's clear that daylight varies not only in quantity but also in quality. Artificial daylight, which is grounded in comprehensive analysis, has the advantage of being consistent in both quantity and quality, as well as being accurate in quality. Modern artificial daylight systems that have been scientifically developed not only free us from dependence on natural daylight for color differentiation but are also superior to it.
Although there are many expert colorists who require an accurate artificial daylight, there are vast fields of lighting where a less accurate daylight quality is necessary. The average eyes are not sufficiently skilled for the finest discrimination of colors and therefore the Mazda "daylight" lamp supplies the less exacting requirements of color matching. It is a compromise between quality and efficiency of light and serves the purpose so well that millions of these lamps have found applications in stores, offices, and industries. In order to make an accurate artificial north skylight for color-work by means of colored glass, from 75 to 85 per cent. of the light from a tungsten lamp must be filtered out. This absorption in a broad sense increases the efficiency of the light, for the fraction that remains is now satisfactory, whereas the original light is virtually useless for accurate color-discrimination. About one third of the original light is absorbed by the bulb of the tungsten "daylight" lamp, with a resultant light which is an approximation to average daylight.
Although many skilled colorists need precise artificial daylight, there are plenty of lighting situations where a less accurate daylight quality is fine. Most people's eyes aren’t trained enough to see the finest color differences, so the Mazda "daylight" lamp meets the less demanding needs of color matching. It strikes a balance between quality and light efficiency, and it's so effective that millions of these lamps are used in stores, offices, and industries. To create a precise artificial north skylight for color work using colored glass, about 75 to 85 percent of the light from a tungsten lamp needs to be filtered out. This reduction in light enhances its efficiency because the amount left is adequate, while the original light is nearly useless for accurate color differentiation. About a third of the original light is absorbed by the bulb of the tungsten "daylight" lamp, resulting in light that closely resembles average daylight.
Old illuminants such as that emitted by the candle and oil-lamp were used for centuries in interiors. All these illuminants were of a warm yellow color. Even the earlier modern illuminants were not very different in color, so it is not surprising that there is a deeply rooted desire for artificial light in the home and in similar interiors of a warm yellow color simulating that of old illuminants. The psychological effect of warmth and cheerfulness due to such illuminants or colors is well established. Artificial light in the home symbolizes independence of nature and protection from the elements and there is a firm desire to counteract the increasing whiteness of modern illuminants by means of shades of a warm tint. The white light is excellent for the kitchen, laundry, and bath-room, and for reading-lamps, but the warm yellow light is best suited for making cozy and cheerful the environment of the interiors in which mankind relaxes. An illuminant of this character can be obtained efficiently by using a properly tinted bulb on tungsten filament lamps. By absorbing about one fourth to one third of the light (depending upon the temperature of the filament) the color of the candle flame may be simulated by means of a tungsten filament lamp. Some persons are still using the carbon-filament lamp despite its low efficiency, because they desire to retain the warmth of tint of the older illuminants. However, light from a tungsten lamp may be filtered to obtain the same quality of light as is emitted by the carbon filament lamp by absorbing from one fifth to one fourth of the light. The luminous efficiency of the tungsten lamp equipped with such a tinted bulb is still about twice as great as that of the carbon-filament lamp. Thus the high efficiency of the modern illuminants is utilized to advantage even though their color is maintained the same as the old illuminants.
Old light sources like candles and oil lamps were used for centuries in homes. All these light sources produced a warm yellow glow. Even the earlier modern lights didn't differ much in color, so it's understandable that people have a strong desire for artificial light in their homes that mimics the warm yellow hue of traditional illuminants. It's well recognized that these warm colors have a comforting and cheerful psychological effect. Artificial light in the home represents freedom from nature and protection from the elements, and there is a strong wish to counteract the increasing brightness of modern lights with warmer tones. Bright white light works well in kitchens, laundry rooms, and bathrooms, as well as for reading lamps, but warm yellow light is best for creating a cozy and cheerful atmosphere in spaces where people relax. You can effectively achieve this warm light by using tinted bulbs with tungsten filament lamps. By absorbing about one-fourth to one-third of the light (depending on the filament's temperature), you can simulate the color of a candle flame with a tungsten filament lamp. Some people still use carbon filament lamps despite their low efficiency because they want to keep that warm tint from the older light sources. However, you can filter the light from a tungsten lamp to achieve similar to the quality of light emitted by a carbon filament lamp by absorbing one-fifth to one-fourth of the light. The luminous efficiency of a tungsten lamp with such a tinted bulb is still around twice as high as that of a carbon filament lamp. Therefore, the high efficiency of modern light sources is put to good use while still maintaining the same color as the old ones.
All modern illuminants emit radiant energy, which does not affect the ordinary photographic plate. This superfluous visible energy merely contributes toward glare or a superabundance of light in photographic studios. A glass has been developed which transmits virtually all the rays that affect the ordinary photographic plate and greatly reduces the accompanying inactive rays. Such a glass is naturally blue in color, because it must transmit the blue, violet, and near ultra-violet rays. Its density has been so determined for use in bulbs for the high-efficiency tungsten lamps that the resultant light appears approximately the color of skylight without sacrificing an appreciable amount of the value of the radiant energy for ordinary photography. This glass, it is seen, transmits the so-called chemical rays and is useful in other activities where these rays alone are desired. It is used in light-therapy and in some other activities in which the chemical effects of these rays are utilized.
All modern light sources emit radiant energy that doesn't impact regular photographic film. This extra visible energy only adds to glare or excess light in photography studios. A type of glass has been developed that allows almost all the rays affecting regular photographic film to pass through while significantly reducing the inactive rays. This glass is naturally blue because it needs to let through blue, violet, and near-ultraviolet rays. Its density has been optimized for use in bulbs for high-efficiency tungsten lamps, making the light appear roughly the same color as natural skylight without losing much of the radiant energy needed for regular photography. This glass, as it turns out, transmits what are known as chemical rays and is valuable in other areas where those specific rays are needed. It is used in light therapy and in various other applications that make use of these rays' chemical effects.
In the photographic dark-room a deep red light is safe for all emulsions excepting the panchromatic, and lamps of this character are standard products. An orange light is safe for many printing papers. Panchromatic plates and films are usually developed in the dark where extreme safety is desired, but a very weak deep red light is not unsafe if used cautiously. However, many photographic emulsions of this character are not very sensitive to green rays, so a green light has been used for this purpose.
In the photo darkroom, a deep red light is safe for all emulsions except panchromatic ones, and these types of lamps are standard products. An orange light is safe for many printing papers. Panchromatic plates and films are typically developed in the dark where utmost safety is necessary, but a very weak deep red light can be used safely if applied cautiously. However, many photographic emulsions of this type aren't very sensitive to green light, so a green light has been used for this purpose.
A variety of colored lights are in demand for theatrical effects, displays, spectacular lighting, signaling, etc., and there are many superficial colorings available for this purpose. Few of these show any appreciable degree of permanency. Permanent superficial colorings have recently been developed, but these are secret processes unavailable for the market. For this reason colored glass is the only medium generally available where permanency is desired. For permanent lighting effects, signal glasses, colored caps, and sheets of colored glass may be used. Tints may be obtained by means of colored reflectors. Other colored media are dyes in lacquers and in varnishes, colored inks, colored textiles, and colored pigments.
A variety of colored lights are commonly used for theatrical effects, displays, stunning lighting, signaling, and more, and there are many temporary color options available for these purposes. However, few of these offer any significant level of durability. Recently, permanent color options have been developed, but these involve secret processes not available on the market. Because of this, colored glass is the only medium widely available when durability is needed. For permanent lighting effects, signal glasses, colored caps, and sheets of colored glass can be used. Tints can be achieved with colored reflectors. Other colored options include dyes in lacquers and varnishes, colored inks, colored fabrics, and colored pigments.
Inasmuch as colored glass enters into the development of permanent devices, it may be of interest to discuss briefly the effects of various metallic compounds which are used in glass. The exact color produced by these compounds, which are often oxides, varies slightly with the composition of the glass and method of manufacture, but this phase is only of technical interest. The coloring substances in glass may be divided into two groups. The first and largest group consists of those in which the coloring matter is in true solution; that is, the coloring is produced in the same manner as the coloring of water in which a chemical salt is dissolved. In the second group the coloring substances are present in a finely divided or colloidal state; that is, the coloring is due to the presence of particles in mechanical suspension. In general, the lighter elements do not tend to produce colored glasses, but the heavier elements in so far as they can be incorporated into glass tend to produce intense colors. Of course, there are exceptions to this general statement.
As colored glass plays a role in the making of permanent devices, it might be interesting to briefly discuss the effects of various metallic compounds used in glass. The exact color produced by these compounds, often oxides, varies slightly depending on the glass composition and manufacturing method, but this is mainly of technical interest. The coloring agents in glass can be divided into two groups. The first and larger group consists of those where the coloring matter is in true solution; that is, the coloring happens in a similar way to how a chemical salt dissolves in water. In the second group, the coloring agents are in a finely divided or colloidal state; that is, the coloring arises from particles that are mechanically suspended. Generally, lighter elements don't usually create colored glasses, while heavier elements, as long as they can be incorporated into glass, tend to produce vibrant colors. Of course, there are exceptions to this general rule.
The alkali metals, such as sodium, potassium, and lithium, do not color glass appreciably, but they have indirect effects upon the colors produced by manganese, nickel, selenium, and some other elements. Gold in sufficient amounts produces a red in glass and in low concentration a beautiful rose. It is present in the colloidal state. In the manufacture of "gold" red glass, the glass when first cooled shows no color, but on reheating the rich ruby color develops. The glass is then cooled slowly. The gold is left in a colloidal state. Copper when added to a glass produces two colors, blue-green and red. The blue-green color, which varies in different kinds of glasses, results when the copper is fully oxidized, and the red by preventing oxidation by the presence of a reducing agent. This red may be developed by reheating as in the case of making gold ruby glass. Selenium produces orange and red colors in glass.
The alkali metals, like sodium, potassium, and lithium, don’t significantly change the color of glass, but they do have indirect effects on the colors created by manganese, nickel, selenium, and some other elements. Gold in large amounts creates a red hue in glass, and in lower concentrations, it gives a lovely rose color. It exists in a colloidal state. When making "gold" red glass, the glass initially shows no color after cooling, but reheating it brings out a deep ruby color. The glass is then cooled slowly, and the gold remains in a colloidal state. When copper is added to glass, it produces two colors: blue-green and red. The blue-green color, which can vary in different types of glass, occurs when the copper is completely oxidized, while the red is formed by stopping oxidation with a reducing agent. This red color can also be developed by reheating, similar to how gold ruby glass is made. Selenium creates orange and red colors in glass.
Silver when applied to the surface of glass produces a beautiful yellow color and it has been widely used in this manner. It has little coloring effect in glass, because it is so readily reduced, resulting in a metallic black. Uranium produces a canary yellow in soda and potash-lime glasses, which fluoresce, and these glasses may be used in the detection of ultra-violet rays. The color is topaz in lead glass. Both sulphur and carbon are used in the manufacture of pale yellow glasses. Antimony has a weak effect, but in the presence of much lead it is used for making opaque or translucent yellow glasses. Chromium produces a green color, which is reddish in lead glass, and yellowish in soda, and potash-lime glasses.
Silver applied to glass creates a lovely yellow color and has been commonly used this way. It has minimal coloring effect in glass because it is easily reduced, resulting in a metallic black. Uranium gives a canary yellow hue in soda and potash-lime glasses, which fluoresce, and these glasses can be used to detect ultraviolet rays. The color appears topaz in lead glass. Both sulfur and carbon are utilized in making pale yellow glasses. Antimony has a slight effect but is used for creating opaque or translucent yellow glasses when there is a lot of lead present. Chromium produces a green color that appears reddish in lead glass and yellowish in soda and potash-lime glasses.
Iron imparts a green or bluish green color to glass. It is usually present as an impurity in the ingredients of glass and its color is neutralized by adding some manganese, which produces a purple color complementary to the bluish green. This accounts for the manganese purple which develops from colorless glass exposed to ultra-violet rays. Iron is used in "bottle green" glass. Its color is greenish blue in potash-lime glass, bluish green in soda-lime glass, and yellowish green in lead glass.
Iron gives glass a green or bluish-green color. It usually appears as an impurity in the glass ingredients, and its color can be neutralized by adding some manganese, which creates a purple color that complements the bluish green. This explains the manganese purple that forms in colorless glass when it's exposed to ultraviolet rays. Iron is used in "bottle green" glass. In potash-lime glass, its color is greenish-blue, bluish-green in soda-lime glass, and yellowish-green in lead glass.
Cobalt is widely used in the production of blue glasses. It produces a violet-blue in potash-lime and soda-lime glasses and a blue in lead glasses. It appears blue, but it transmits deep red rays. For this reason when used in conjunction with a deep red glass, a filter for only the deepest red rays is obtained. Nickel produces an amethyst color in potash-lime glass, a reddish brown in soda-lime glass, and a purple in lead glass. Manganese is used largely as a "decolorizing" agent in counteracting the blue-green of iron. It produces an amethyst color in potash-lime glass and reddish violet in soda-lime and lead glasses.
Cobalt is commonly used to make blue glass. It creates a violet-blue hue in potash-lime and soda-lime glasses and a blue color in lead glasses. While it looks blue, it allows deep red rays to pass through. Because of this, when combined with a deep red glass, it acts as a filter for only the darkest red rays. Nickel gives an amethyst color in potash-lime glass, a reddish-brown in soda-lime glass, and a purple shade in lead glass. Manganese is mainly used as a "decolorizing" agent to counteract the blue-green tint from iron. It creates an amethyst color in potash-lime glass and a reddish violet in soda-lime and lead glasses.
These are the principal coloring ingredients used in the manufacture of colored glass. The staining of glass is done under lower temperatures, so that a greater variety of chemical compounds may be used. The resulting colors of metals and metallic oxides dissolved in glass depend not only upon the nature of the metal used, but also partly upon the stage of oxidation, the composition of the glass and even upon the temperature of the fusion.
These are the main coloring ingredients used in making colored glass. The staining of glass happens at lower temperatures, allowing for a wider variety of chemical compounds to be used. The resulting colors from metals and metallic oxides dissolved in glass depend not only on the type of metal used, but also partly on the oxidation stage, the glass composition, and even the fusion temperature.
In developing a glass filter the effects of the various coloring elements are determined spectrally and the various elements are varied in proper proportions until the glass of desired spectral transmission is obtained. It is seen that the coloring elements are limited and the combination of these is further limited by chemical considerations. In combining various colored glasses or various coloring elements in the same glass the "subtractive" method of color-mixture is utilized. For example, if a green glass is desired, yellowish green chromium glass may be used as a basis. By the addition of some blue-green due to copper, the yellow rays may be further subdued so that the resulting color is green.
In creating a glass filter, the effects of different coloring elements are determined through spectral analysis, and the various elements are adjusted in the right proportions until the glass achieves the desired spectral transmission. It's evident that the coloring elements are limited, and their combinations are further restricted by chemical factors. When mixing different colored glasses or coloring elements within the same glass, the "subtractive" color mixing method is applied. For example, if a green glass is needed, yellowish green chromium glass can be used as the base. By adding some blue-green from copper, the yellow rays can be further muted, resulting in a green color.
The primary colors for this method of color-mixture are the same as those of the painter in mixing pigments—namely, purple, yellow, and blue-green. Various colors may be obtained by superposing or intimately mixing the colors. The resulting transmission (reflection in the case of reflecting media such as pigments) are those colors commonly transmitted by all the components of a mixture. Thus,
The main colors for this way of mixing colors are the same as those a painter uses with pigments—specifically, purple, yellow, and blue-green. Different colors can be created by layering or closely mixing these colors. The resulting transmission (or reflection in the case of reflective materials like pigments) are the colors typically transmitted by all the components of a mixture. Thus,
Purple and yellow | = red |
Yellow and blue-green | = green |
Blue-green and purple | = blue |
The colors produced by adding lights are based not on the "subtractive" method but on the actual addition of colors. These primaries are red, green, and blue and it will be noted that they are the complementaries of the "subtractive" primaries. By the use of red, green, and blue lights in various proportions, all colors may be obtained in varying degrees of purity. The chief mixtures of two of the "additive" primaries produce the "subtractive" primaries. Thus,
The colors created by mixing lights rely on the "additive" method rather than the "subtractive" method. The primary colors for this are red, green, and blue, which are the complements of the "subtractive" primaries. By combining red, green, and blue lights in different amounts, you can achieve all colors with varying levels of purity. The main combinations of two of the "additive" primaries result in the "subtractive" primaries. So,
Red and blue | = purple |
Red and green | = yellow |
Green and blue | = blue-green |
Although the coloring media which are permanent under the action of light, heat, and moisture are relatively few, by a knowledge of their spectral characteristics and other principles of color the expert is able to produce many permanent colors for lighting effects. The additive and subtractive methods are chiefly involved, but there is another method which is an "averaging" additive one. For example, if a warm tint of yellow is desired and only a dense yellow glass is available, the yellow glass may be cut into small pieces and arranged upon a colorless glass in checker-board fashion. Thus a great deal of uncolored light which is transmitted by the filter is slightly tinted by the yellow light passing through the pieces of yellow glass. If this light is properly mixed by a diffusing glass the effect is satisfactory. These are the principal means of obtaining colored light by means of filters and by mixing colored lights. By using these in conjunction with the array of light-sources available it is possible to meet most of the growing demands. Of course, the ideal solution is to make the colored light directly at the light-source, and doubtless future developments which now appear remote or even impossible will supply such colored illuminants. In the meantime, much is being accomplished with the means available.
Although there are only a few coloring materials that are permanent under light, heat, and moisture, an expert can create many lasting colors for lighting effects by understanding their spectral characteristics and other color principles. The main methods used are additive and subtractive, but there’s also another approach that averages the additive method. For instance, if a warm yellow tint is needed but only a dense yellow glass is accessible, the yellow glass can be cut into small pieces and arranged in a checkerboard pattern on a colorless glass. This way, a significant amount of uncolored light that passes through the filter gets slightly tinted by the yellow light from the pieces of yellow glass. If this light is mixed correctly with a diffusing glass, the effect is pleasing. These techniques are the main ways to achieve colored light using filters and mixing colored lights. By combining these methods with various light sources, it’s possible to meet most of the increasing demands. Ideally, the best solution would be to create colored light right at the light source, and future advancements that currently seem distant or even impossible may provide such colored lighting. In the meantime, a lot is being achieved with the available methods.
XXII
SPECTACULAR LIGHTING
Artificial light is a natural agency for producing spectacular effects. It is readily controlled and altered in color and the brightness which it lends to displays outdoors at night renders them extremely conspicuous against the darkness of the sky. It surpasses other decorative media by the extreme range of values which may be obtained. The decorator and painter are limited by a range of values from black to white pigments, which ordinarily represents an extreme contrast of about one to thirty. The brightnesses due to light may vary from darkness to those of the light-sources themselves. The decorator deals with secondary light—that is, light reflected by more or less diffusely reflecting objects. The lighting expert has at his command not only this secondary light but the primary light of the sources. Lighting effects everywhere attract attention and even the modern merchant testifies that adequate lighting in his store is of advertising value. In all the field of spectacular lighting the superiority of artificial light over natural light is demonstrated.
Artificial light is a powerful tool for creating stunning effects. It's easy to control and change in color, and the brightness it adds to outdoor displays at night makes them stand out against the dark sky. It outshines other decorative methods due to the vast range of values it can produce. Decorators and painters can only work within the limits of black and white pigments, which usually offer a contrast of about one to thirty. In contrast, brightness from lights can range from complete darkness to the brightness of the light sources themselves. Decorators use secondary light, which is light that bounces off various surfaces. However, lighting experts have access to both this secondary light and the primary light from the sources. Lighting effects always grab attention, and even modern retailers acknowledge that proper lighting in their stores is valuable for advertising. Throughout the realm of spectacular lighting, the advantages of artificial light over natural light are clearly shown.
Light is a universal medium with which to attract attention and to enthrall mankind. The civilizations of all ages have realized this natural power of light. It has played a part in the festivals and triumphal processions from time immemorial and is still the most important feature of many celebrations. In the early festivals fires, candles, and oil-lamps were used and fireworks were invented for the purpose. Even to-day the pyrotechnical displays against the dark depths of the night sky hold mankind spellbound. But these evanescent notes of light have been improved upon by more permanent displays on a huge scale. Thirty years before the first practical installation of gas-lighting an exhibition of "Philosophical Fireworks" produced by the combustion of inflammable gases was given in several cities of England.
Light is a universal medium that captures attention and fascinates people. Civilizations throughout history have recognized this natural power of light. It has been a part of festivals and triumphant processions since ancient times and remains a key feature of many celebrations today. In early festivals, fires, candles, and oil lamps were used, and fireworks were created for this purpose. Even today, the stunning pyrotechnic displays against the dark night sky mesmerize people. However, these brief flashes of light have been enhanced by more permanent displays on a large scale. Thirty years before gas lighting was practically installed, an exhibition of "Philosophical Fireworks," created through the combustion of flammable gases, was showcased in several cities in England.
It is a long step from the array of flickering gas-flames with which the fronts of the buildings of the Soho works were illuminated a century ago to the wonderful lighting effects a century later at the Panama-Pacific Exposition. Some who saw that original display of gas-jets totaling a few hundred candle-power described it as an "occasion of extraordinary splendour." What would they have said of the modern spectacular lighting at the Exposition where Ryan used in a single effect forty-eight large search-lights aggregating 2,600,000,000 beam candle-power! No other comparison exemplifies more strikingly the progress of artificial lighting in the hundred years which have elapsed since it began to be developed.
It’s a significant leap from the flickering gas flames that lit up the buildings of the Soho works a century ago to the amazing lighting effects seen a century later at the Panama-Pacific Exposition. Some who witnessed the original display of gas jets, which had a few hundred candle power, called it an "event of extraordinary splendor." What would they have thought of the modern spectacular lighting at the Exposition, where Ryan used forty-eight large searchlights that produced a staggering 2,600,000,000 beam candle power in a single effect? No other comparison better highlights the progress of artificial lighting over the hundred years since it started to develop.
The nature of the light-sources in the first half of the nineteenth century did not encourage spectacular or display lighting. In fact, this phase of lighting chiefly developed along with electric lamps. Of course, occasionally some temporary effect was attempted as in the case of illuminating the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral in London in 1872, but continued operation of the display was not entertained. In the case of lighting this dome a large number of ship's lanterns were used, but the result was unsatisfactory. After this unsuccessful attempt at lighting St. Paul's, a suggestion was made of "flooding it with electric light projected from various quarters." Spectacular lighting outdoors really began in earnest in the dawn of the twentieth century.
The types of light sources available in the first half of the nineteenth century didn't really allow for impressive or showcase lighting. Most of this development happened alongside the invention of electric lamps. Occasionally, temporary lighting effects were attempted, like illuminating the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral in London in 1872, but there wasn't any thought of keeping the display running. To light up the dome, many ship's lanterns were used, but the outcome was disappointing. After this failed attempt at lighting St. Paul's, someone suggested "flooding it with electric light projected from different angles." Real outdoor spectacular lighting truly took off at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Although some of the first attempts at spectacular lighting outdoors were made with search-lights, spectacular lighting did not become generally popular until the appearance of incandescent filament lamps of reasonable efficiency and cost. The effects were obtained primarily by the use of small electric filament lamps draped in festoons or installed along the outlines and other principal lines of buildings and monuments. The effect was almost wholly that of light, for the glare from the visible lamps obscured the buildings or other objects. The method is still used because it is simple and the effects may be permanently installed without requiring any attention excepting to replace burned-out lamps. However, the method has limitations from an artistic point of view because the artistic effects of painting, sculpture, and architecture cannot be combined with it very effectively. For example, the details of a monument or of a building cannot be seen distinctly enough to be appreciated. The effect is merely that of outlines or lines and patterns of points of light and is usually glaring.
Although some of the earliest efforts at creating impressive outdoor lighting used searchlights, it didn't really catch on until incandescent filament lamps became efficient and affordable. The visual effects were mainly achieved by hanging small electric filament lamps in strands or placing them along the edges and key features of buildings and monuments. The result was primarily light, as the brightness of the visible lamps often overshadowed the structures they illuminated. This method is still popular because it’s straightforward, and the setups can be permanently installed with minimal maintenance aside from replacing burnt-out bulbs. However, from an artistic standpoint, this method has its drawbacks, as it doesn't effectively combine with the artistic elements of painting, sculpture, and architecture. For instance, the intricate details of a monument or building aren’t distinct enough to fully appreciate. The outcome is mostly outlines or patterns of light points, which tend to be quite bright.
The next step was to conceal these lamps behind the cornices or other projections or in nooks constructed the purpose. Light now began to mold and to paint the objects. The structures began to be visible; at least the important cornices and other details were no longer mere outlines. The introduction of the drawn-wire tungsten lamp is responsible for an innovation in spectacular lighting of this sort, for now it became possible to make concentrated light-sources so essential to projectors. Furthermore, these lighting units require very little attention after once being located. With the introduction of electric-filament lamps of this character small projectors came into use, and by means of concentrated beams of light whole buildings and monuments could be flooded with light from remote positions. The effects obtained by concealing lamps behind cornices had demonstrated that the lighting of the surfaces was the object to be realized in most cases, and when small projectors not requiring constant attention became available, a great impetus was given to flood-lighting.
The next step was to hide these lamps behind the cornices or other projections or in specially built nooks the purpose. Light began to shape and highlight the objects. The structures became visible; at least the key cornices and other details were no longer just outlines. The introduction of the drawn-wire tungsten lamp led to an innovation in dynamic lighting like this, as it became possible to create concentrated light sources that were essential for projectors. Moreover, these lighting units need very little maintenance once they're set up. With the arrival of electric-filament lamps like these, small projectors started to be used, allowing entire buildings and monuments to be lit up from far away with focused beams of light. The results from hiding lamps behind cornices showed that lighting the surfaces was the main goal in most cases, and the availability of small projectors that didn't require constant monitoring greatly boosted flood-lighting.
When France gave to this country the Bartholdi Statue of Liberty there was no thought of having this emblem visible at night excepting for the torch held the hand of Liberty. This torch was modified at the time of the erection of the statue to accommodate the lamps available, with the result that it was merely a lantern containing a number of electric lamps. At night it was a speck of light more feeble than many surrounding shore lights. The statue had been lighted during festivals with festoons and outlines of lamps, but in 1915, when the freedom of the generous donor of the statue appeared to be at stake, a movement was begun which culminated in a fund for flood-lighting Liberty. The broad foundation of the statue made the lighting comparatively easy by means of banks of incandescent filament search-lights. About 225 of these units were used with a total beam candle-power of about 20,000,000. The original idea of an imitation flame for the torch was restored by building this from pieces of yellow cathedral glass of three densities. About six hundred pieces of glass were used, the upper ones being generally of the lighter tints and the lower ones of the darker tints. A lighthouse lens was placed in this lantern so that an intense beam of light would radiate from it. The flood-lighted Statue of Liberty is now visible by night as well as by day and it has a double significance at night, for light also symbolizes independence.
When France gifted the Bartholdi Statue of Liberty to this country, there wasn't any plan to make this symbol visible at night except for the torch held in Liberty's hand. This torch was modified when the statue was erected to accommodate the available lamps, resulting in it being just a lantern with several electric bulbs. At night, it was a weak spot of light, less bright than many surrounding shore lights. The statue had been illuminated during festivals with strings of lights and outlined with lamps, but in 1915, when the freedom of the statue’s generous donor seemed to be threatened, a movement began that led to a fund for flood-lighting Liberty. The statue's wide base made the lighting relatively easy, using banks of incandescent filament searchlights. Around 225 of these units were deployed, generating a total beam candle-power of about 20,000,000. The original idea for an imitation flame for the torch was brought back by constructing it from pieces of yellow cathedral glass in three densities. About six hundred pieces of glass were used, with the upper pieces generally being lighter in color and the lower ones being darker. A lighthouse lens was added to this lantern to create an intense beam of light. The flood-lit Statue of Liberty is now visible at night as well as during the day, and it carries a double meaning at night, as light also symbolizes independence.
Just as the Statue of Liberty stands alone in the New York Harbor so does the Woolworth Building reign supreme on lower Manhattan. Liberty proclaims independence from the bondage of man and the Woolworth Tower stands majestically in defiance of the elements as a symbol of man's growing independence of nature. This building with its cream terra-cotta surface and intricate architectural details touched here and there with buff, blue, green, red, and gold, rises 792 feet or sixty stories above the street and typifies the American spirit of conceiving and of executing great undertakings. In it are blended art, utility, and majesty. Viewed by multitudes during the day, it is a valuable advertisement for the name which stands for a national institution. But by day it shares attention with its surroundings. If lighted at night it would stand virtually alone against the dark sky and the investment would not be wholly idle during the evening hours.
Just as the Statue of Liberty stands tall in New York Harbor, the Woolworth Building dominates lower Manhattan. Liberty symbolizes freedom from oppression, and the Woolworth Tower stands proudly as a testament to humanity's growing independence from nature. With its creamy terra-cotta facade and intricate architectural details accented in shades of buff, blue, green, red, and gold, this building rises 792 feet or sixty stories above the street, embodying the American spirit of vision and ambition. It blends art, practicality, and grandeur. Seen by countless people during the day, it serves as a strong representation of a name that signifies a national institution. However, during the day, it shares the spotlight with its surroundings. If illuminated at night, it would stand almost alone against the dark sky, making the investment not entirely idle during the evening.
Mr. H. H. Magdsick, who designed the lighting for Liberty, planned the lighting for the Woolworth Tower, which rises 407 feet or thirty-one stories above the main building. Five hundred and fifty projectors containing tungsten filament lamps were distributed about the base of the tower and among some of the architectural details. The main architectural features of the mansard roof extending from the fifty-third to the fifty-seventh floor, the observation balcony at the fifty-eighth and the lantern structures at the fifty-ninth and sixtieth floors are covered with gold-leaf. By proper placing of the projectors a glittering effect is obtained from these gold surfaces. The crowning features of the lighting effect are the lanterns in the crest of the spire. Twenty-four 1000-watt tungsten lamps were placed behind crystal diffusing glass, which transmits the light predominantly in a horizontal direction. Thus at long distances, from which the architectural details cannot be distinguished, the brilliant crowning light is visible. An automatic dimmer was devised so that the effect of a huge varying flame was obtained. At close range, owing to the nature of the glass panels, this portion is not much brighter than the remainder of the surfaces. When the artificial lighting is in operation the tower becomes a majestic spire of light and this magnificent Gothic structure projecting defiantly into the depths of darkness is in more than one sense a torch of modern civilization.
Mr. H. H. Magdsick, who designed the lighting for Liberty, also planned the lighting for the Woolworth Tower, which stands 407 feet tall or thirty-one stories above the main building. Five hundred and fifty projectors equipped with tungsten filament lamps were placed around the base of the tower and among some architectural details. The main architectural features of the mansard roof, which stretches from the fifty-third to the fifty-seventh floor, the observation balcony on the fifty-eighth, and the lantern structures on the fifty-ninth and sixtieth floors are covered in gold leaf. With careful placement of the projectors, a glittering effect is achieved on these gold surfaces. The highlights of the lighting design are the lanterns at the top of the spire. Twenty-four 1000-watt tungsten lamps were installed behind crystal diffusing glass, which primarily directs the light horizontally. Therefore, from a distance where the architectural details can't be made out, the brilliant light at the top is still visible. An automatic dimmer was created to give the effect of a large, flickering flame. Up close, due to the type of glass panels, this area is not much brighter than the rest of the surfaces. When the artificial lighting is turned on, the tower transforms into a majestic spire of light, and this magnificent Gothic structure, boldly extending into the darkness, serves as a beacon of modern civilization.
Many prominent buildings and monuments have burst forth in a flood of light, and their beauty and symbolism have been appreciated at night by many persons who do not notice them by day. Not only are the beautiful structures of man lighted permanently but many temporary effects are devised. Artificial lighting effects have become a prominent part in outdoor festivals, pageants, and theatricals. Candles have been associated with Christmas trees ever since the latter came into use and naturally artificial light has been a feature in the community Christmas trees which have come into vogue in recent years. The Municipal Christmas Tree in Chicago in 1916 was ninety feet high and was lighted with projectors. Thousands of gems taken from the Tower of Jewels at the San Francisco Exposition added life and sparkle to that of the other decorations.
Many famous buildings and monuments have come alive with light, and their beauty and symbolism have been appreciated at night by people who overlook them during the day. Not only are the beautiful man-made structures permanently illuminated, but many temporary light displays are created as well. Artificial lighting effects have become a key part of outdoor festivals, parades, and performances. Candles have been linked to Christmas trees ever since they were first used, and naturally, artificial light has become a feature of the community Christmas trees that have become popular in recent years. The Municipal Christmas Tree in Chicago in 1916 was ninety feet tall and lit up with projectors. Thousands of gems from the Tower of Jewels at the San Francisco Exposition added life and sparkle to the other decorations.

Luna Park, Coney Island, studded with 60,000 incandescent filament lamps
Luna Park, Coney Island, decorated with 60,000 bright light bulbs
THE NEW FLOOD LIGHTING CONTRASTED WITH THE OLD OUTLINE LIGHTING
THE NEW FLOODLIGHTING STANDS OUT AGAINST THE OLD OUTLINE LIGHTING
After the close of the recent war artificial light played a prominent part throughout the country in the joyful festivals. A jeweled arch erected in New York in honor of the returning soldiers rivaled some of the spectacles of the Panama-Pacific Exposition. The arch hung like a gigantic curtain of jewels between two obelisks, which rose to a height of eighty feet and were surmounted by jeweled forms in the shape of sunbursts. Approximately thirty thousand jewels glittered in the beams of batteries of arc-projectors. Many of the signs and devices which played a part in the "Welcome Home" movement were of striking nature and of a character to indicate permanency. The equipment of a large building consisted of more than five thousand 10-watt lamps, the entire building being outlined with stars consisting of eleven lamps each. The "Brighten Up" campaign spread throughout the country. The lighting and installation of signs and special patriotic displays, the flooding of streets and shop-windows with light without stint, produced an inspiring and uplifting effect which did much to restore cheerfulness and optimism. A glowing example was set in Washington, where the flood-lighting of the Capitol, discontinued shortly after our entrance into the war, was resumed.
After the recent war ended, artificial light played a major role in joyful celebrations across the country. A dazzling arch built in New York to honor the returning soldiers was as impressive as some of the displays at the Panama-Pacific Exposition. The arch hung like a massive curtain of jewels between two obelisks that reached eighty feet tall and were topped with jeweled sunburst designs. About thirty thousand jewels sparkled under powerful arc lights. Many of the signs and decorations involved in the "Welcome Home" campaign were striking and seemed meant to last. A large building was lit up with over five thousand 10-watt lamps, with the entire structure outlined by stars made up of eleven lamps each. The "Brighten Up" campaign spread nationwide. The lighting and setup of signs and patriotic displays, as well as the brightening of streets and shop windows with copious light, created an inspiring and uplifting atmosphere that helped restore joy and optimism. A prime example was in Washington, where the floodlighting of the Capitol, which had stopped shortly after we entered the war, was turned back on.
In Chicago a "Victory Way" was established, with street-lighting posts on both sides of the street equipped with red, white, and blue globes surmounted by a golden goddess of Victory. One hundred and seventy-five projectors were installed along the way on the roofs and in the windows of office buildings. A brilliant, scintillating "Altar of Victory" was erected at the center of the Way. It was composed of two enormous candelabra erected one on each side of a platform ninety feet high. These were studded with jewels and supported a curtain of jewels suspended from the altar. In the center of the curtain was a huge jeweled eagle bearing the Allied flags. This was illuminated by arc-projectors which delivered 200,000,000 beam candle-power. In addition to these there were many smaller projectors. In the top of each candelabra six large red-and-orange lamps were installed in reflectors. These illuminated live steam which issued from the top. Surmounting the whole was a huge luminous fan formed by beams from large arc search-lights. These are only a few of the many lighting effects which welcomed the returning soldiers, but they illustrate how much modern civilization depends upon artificial light for expressing its feelings and emotions. Throughout all these festivals light silently symbolized happiness, freedom, and advancement.
In Chicago, a "Victory Way" was set up, with streetlights on both sides of the street featuring red, white, and blue globes topped with a golden goddess of Victory. One hundred seventy-five projectors were placed along the path on the roofs and in the windows of office buildings. A stunning "Altar of Victory" was built at the center of the Way. It consisted of two massive candelabras, one on each side of a ninety-foot-high platform. These were adorned with jewels and held a curtain of jewels hanging from the altar. In the center of the curtain was a huge jeweled eagle displaying the Allied flags. This was lit by arc projectors that delivered 200,000,000 beam candle-power. Along with these, there were numerous smaller projectors. At the top of each candelabra were six large red-and-orange lamps in reflectors that lit up live steam coming from the top. Crowning the whole setup was a giant luminous fan created by beams from large arc searchlights. These are just a few of the many lighting effects that welcomed the returning soldiers, but they show how much modern civilization relies on artificial light to express its feelings and emotions. Throughout all these celebrations, light quietly represented happiness, freedom, and progress.
Projectors were used on a large scale in several cases before the advent of the concentrated filament lamp. W. D'A. Ryan, the leader in spectacular lighting, lighted the Niagara Falls in 1907 with batteries of arc-projectors aggregating 1,115,000,000-beam candle-power. In 1908 he used thirty arc-projectors to flood the Singer Tower in New York with light and projected light to the flag on top by means of a search-light thirty inches in diameter. Many flags waved throughout the war in the beams of search-lights, symbolizing a patriotism fully aroused. The search-light beam as it bores through the atmosphere at night is usually faintly bright, owing to the small amount of fog, dust, and smoke in the air. By providing more "substance" in the atmosphere, the beams are made to appear brighter. Following this reasoning, Ryan developed his scintillator consisting of a battery of search-light beams projected upward through clouds of steam which provided an artificial fog. This was first displayed at the Hudson-Fulton celebration with a battery of arc search-lights totaling 1,000,000,000-candle-power.
Projectors were widely used in various situations before the concentrated filament lamp became common. W. D'A. Ryan, a pioneer in spectacular lighting, illuminated Niagara Falls in 1907 with a setup of arc projectors that produced a total of 1,115,000,000 beam candle-power. In 1908, he employed thirty arc projectors to flood the Singer Tower in New York with light, using a thirty-inch diameter searchlight to project light onto the flag at the top. Many flags waved throughout the war under the beams of searchlights, symbolizing a fully awakened patriotism. The searchlight beam, as it cuts through the atmosphere at night, usually appears dim due to the small amount of fog, dust, and smoke in the air. By adding more "substance" to the atmosphere, the beams can appear brighter. Following this idea, Ryan created his scintillator, which featured a series of searchlight beams projected upward through clouds of steam to create an artificial fog. This was first showcased at the Hudson-Fulton celebration using a battery of arc searchlights that amounted to 1,000,000,000 candle-power.
All these effects despite their magnitude were dwarfed by those at the Panama-Pacific Exposition, and inasmuch as this up to the present time represents the crowning achievement in spectacular lighting, some of the details worked out by Ryan may be of interest. In general, the lighting effects departed from the bizarre outline lighting in which glaring light-sources studded the structures. The radiant grandeur and beauty of flood-lighting from concealed light-sources was the key-note of the lighting. In this manner wonderful effects were obtained, which not only appealed to the eye and to the artistic sensibility but which were free from glare. By means of flood-lighting and relief-lighting from concealed light-sources the third dimension or depth was obtained and the architectural details and colorings were preserved. A great many different kinds of devices and lamps were used to make the night effects superior in grandeur to those of daytime. The Zone or amusement section was lighted with bare lamps in the older manner and the glaring bizarre effects contrasted the spectacular lighting of the past with the illumination of the future.
All these effects, despite their size, were overshadowed by those at the Panama-Pacific Exposition. Since this event has become the ultimate achievement in breathtaking lighting, some of the details developed by Ryan might be interesting. Overall, the lighting effects moved away from the strange outline lighting that featured bright light sources covering the structures. The stunning grandeur and beauty of flood lighting from hidden light sources was the main focus of the lighting. This approach created amazing effects that not only captivated the eye and artistic sense but also eliminated glare. Through flood lighting and relief lighting from concealed sources, a sense of depth was achieved, while preserving the architectural details and color. A wide variety of devices and lamps were used to make the night effects even more impressive than those seen during the day. The Zone or amusement area was lit with exposed bulbs in the traditional style, and the harsh, unusual effects contrasted sharply with the spectacular lighting of the past and the illumination of the future.
In another section the visitor was greeted with a gorgeous display of carnival spirit. Beautifully colored heraldic shields on which were written the early history of the Pacific coast were illuminated by groups of luminous arc-lamps on standards varying from twenty-five to fifty-five feet in height. The Tower of Jewels with more than a hundred thousand dangling gems was flood-lighted, and the myriads of minute reflected images of light-sources glittering against the dark sky produced an effect surpassing the dreams of imagination. Shadows and high-lights of striking contrasts or of elusive colors greeted the visitor on every hand. Individual isolated effects of light were to be found here and there. Fire hissed from the mouths of serpents and cast the spell of mobile light over the composite Spanish-Gothic-Oriental setting. A colored beam of a search-light played here and there. Mysterious vapors rising from caldrons were in reality illuminated steam. Symbolic fountain groups did not escape the magic touch of the lighting wizard.
In another section, the visitor was welcomed by a stunning display of carnival spirit. Brightly colored heraldic shields, each detailing the early history of the Pacific coast, were lit up by groups of glowing arc lamps on poles ranging from twenty-five to fifty-five feet tall. The Tower of Jewels, adorned with over a hundred thousand hanging gems, was floodlit, and the countless tiny reflected images of light against the dark sky created an effect that exceeded the wildest imagination. Striking contrasts and elusive colors in shadows and highlights welcomed the visitor from every direction. Individual pockets of light could be found here and there. Fire hissed from the mouths of serpents, casting a spell of moving light over the unique blend of Spanish, Gothic, and Oriental styles. A colored beam from a searchlight danced around. Mysterious vapors rising from cauldrons were actually illuminated steam. Symbolic fountain groups were not overlooked by the lighting wizard's magical touch.
In the Court of the Universe great areas were illuminated by two fountains rising about a hundred feet above the sunken gardens. One of these symbolized the setting sun, the other the rising sun. The shaft and ball at the crest of each fountain were glazed with heavy opal glass imitating travertine marble and in these were installed incandescent lamps of a total candle-power of 500,000. The balustrade seventy feet above the sunken gardens was surmounted by nearly two hundred incandescent filament search-lights. Light was everywhere, either varying in color into a harmonious scene or changing in light and shadow to mold the architecture and sculpture. The enormous glass dome of the Palace of Horticulture was converted into an astronomical sphere by projecting images upon it in such a manner that spots of light revolved; rings and comets which appeared at the horizon passed on their way through the heavens, changing in color and disappearing again at the horizon. All these effects and many more were mirrored in the waters of the lagoons and the whole was a Wonderland indeed.
In the Court of the Universe, vast areas were lit up by two fountains that shot up about a hundred feet above the sunken gardens. One of these represented the setting sun, while the other symbolized the rising sun. The tops of each fountain featured globes made of heavy opal glass that looked like travertine marble, and inside them were incandescent lamps totaling 500,000 candlepower. The balustrade, which was seventy feet above the sunken gardens, was lined with nearly two hundred incandescent filament searchlights. Light was everywhere, either shifting in color to create a beautiful scene or changing in light and shadow to enhance the architecture and sculptures. The huge glass dome of the Palace of Horticulture transformed into an astronomical sphere by projecting images onto it, making spots of light rotate; rings and comets appeared at the horizon, traveled through the sky, changed colors, and vanished again at the horizon. All these effects, and many more, were reflected in the waters of the lagoons, creating a true Wonderland.
The scintillator consisted of 48 arc search-lights three feet in diameter totaling 2,600,000,000 beam candle-power. The lighting units were equipped with colored screens and the beams which radiated upward were supplied with an artificial fog by means of steam generated by a modern express locomotive. The latter was so arranged that the wheels could be driven at a speed of sixty miles per hour under brake, thereby emitting great volumes of steam and smoke, which when illuminated with various colors produced a magnificent spectacle. Over three hundred scintillator effects were worked out and this feature of fireless fireworks was widely varied. The aurora borealis and other effects created by this battery of search-lights extended for many miles. The many effects regularly available were augmented on special occasions and it is safe to state that this apparatus built upon a huge scale provided a flexibility of fireless fireworks never attained even with small-scale devices.
The scintillator had 48 arc searchlights that were three feet in diameter, delivering a total of 2,600,000,000 beam candle-power. The lighting units came with colored screens, and the beams that shot upward were enhanced with an artificial fog created by steam from a modern express train. The train was set up so that the wheels could spin at sixty miles per hour while braking, which let out large volumes of steam and smoke. When illuminated with various colors, this created a stunning display. Over three hundred scintillator effects were developed, making this feature of fireless fireworks highly diverse. The northern lights and other effects produced by this array of searchlights spread for many miles. The many regular effects were amplified on special occasions, and it’s safe to say that this massive setup offered a level of flexibility in fireless fireworks that was never matched even by smaller-scale devices.
The lighting of the exposition can barely be touched upon in a few paragraphs and it would be difficult to describe in words even if space were unlimited. It represented the power of light to beautify and to awe. It showed the feebleness of the decorator's media in comparison with light pulsating with life. It consisted of a great variety of direct, masked, concealed, and projected effects, but these were blended harmoniously with one another and with the decorative and architectural details of the structures. It was a crowning achievement of a century of public lighting which began with Murdock's initial display of a hundred flickering gas-jets. It demonstrated the powers of science in the production of light and of genius and imagination in the utilization of light. It was a silent but pulsating display of grandeur dwarfing into insignificance the aurora borealis in its most resplendent moments.
The lighting of the exhibition can hardly be summed up in just a few paragraphs, and it would be tough to describe it even if there were no limits to space. It showcased the ability of light to enhance beauty and inspire awe. It highlighted how inadequate the decorator's materials were compared to light, which was full of life. It included a wide range of direct, masked, concealed, and projected effects, all blending seamlessly with each other and with the decorative and architectural elements of the structures. This was the crowning achievement of a century of public lighting that started with Murdock's initial display of a hundred flickering gas jets. It exhibited the capabilities of science in creating light and the creativity and imagination in its use. It was a silent yet vibrant display of magnificence that made the aurora borealis seem insignificant, even during its most stunning moments.
XXIII
THE EXPRESSIVENESS OF LIGHT
From an esthetic or, more broadly, a psychological point of view no medium rivals light in expressiveness. Not only is light allied with man's most important sense but throughout long ages of associations and uses mankind has bestowed upon it many attributes. In fact, it is possible that light, color, and darkness possess certain fundamentally innate powers; at least, they have acquired expressive and impressive powers through the many associations in mythology, religion, nature, and common usage. Besides these attributes, light possesses a great advantage over the media of decoration in obtaining brightness and color effects. For example, the landscape artist cannot reproduce the range of values or brightnesses in most of nature's scenes, for if black is used to represent a deep shadow, white is not bright enough to represent the value of the sky. In fact, the range of brightnesses represented by the deep shadow and the sky extends far beyond the range represented by black and white pigments. The extreme contrast ordinarily available by means of artist's colors is about thirty to one, but the sky is a thousand times brighter than a shadow, a sunlit cloud is thousands of times brighter than the deep shadows of woods, and the sun is millions of times brighter than the shadows in a landscape.
From an aesthetic or, more broadly, a psychological perspective, no medium is as expressive as light. Light is not only tied to our most important sense, but over the ages, humanity has attributed many qualities to it. In fact, it's possible that light, color, and darkness have certain innate powers; at the very least, they've gained expressive and impressive qualities through associations in mythology, religion, nature, and everyday life. In addition to these qualities, light has a significant advantage over decorative media in creating brightness and color effects. For instance, a landscape artist can't replicate the full range of values or brightness found in most natural scenes; if black is used to show a deep shadow, white often can't capture the brightness of the sky. The range of brightness between deep shadows and the sky goes far beyond what can be depicted with black and white paints. The extreme contrast achievable with artist's colors is about thirty to one, but the sky is a thousand times brighter than a shadow, a sunlit cloud is thousands of times brighter than the deep shadows of the woods, and the sun is millions of times brighter than the shadows in a landscape.
The range of brightnesses obtainable by means of light extends from darkness or black throughout the range represented by pigments under equal illumination and beyond these through the enormous range obtainable by unequal illumination of surfaces to the brightnesses of the light-sources themselves. In the matter of purity of colors, light surpasses reflecting media, for it is easy to obtain approximately pure hues by means of light and to obtain pure spectral hues by resorting to the spectrum of light. It is impossible to obtain pure hues by means of pigments or of other reflecting media. These advantages of light are very evident on turning to spectacular lighting effects, and even the lighting of interiors illustrates a potentiality in light superior to other media. For example, in a modern interior in which concealed lighting produces brilliantly illuminated areas above a cornice and dark shadows on the under side, the range in values is often much greater than that represented by black and white, and still there remains the possibility of employing the light-sources themselves in extending the scale of brightness. Superposing color upon the whole it is obvious that the combination of "primary" light with reflected light possesses much greater potentiality than the latter alone. This potentiality of light is best realized if lighting is regarded as "painting with light" in a manner analogous to the decorator's painting with pigments, etc.
The range of brightness that can be achieved with light spans from darkness or black, across the spectrum of pigments under the same lighting conditions, and even further through the vast array created by uneven lighting on surfaces, reaching the brightness of the light sources themselves. When it comes to color purity, light outshines reflective materials, as it's quite easy to get nearly pure colors with light and achieve pure spectral colors by using the light spectrum. It's impossible to get pure colors with pigments or other reflective materials. These benefits of light become clear when looking at spectacular lighting effects, and even the lighting in interiors shows a potential in light that exceeds other materials. For instance, in a modern interior where hidden lighting creates brightly lit areas above a cornice while casting deep shadows below, the range of light values is often much greater than just black and white, and there's still room to use the light sources themselves to broaden the brightness scale. When you add color to the mix, it’s clear that combining "primary" light with reflected light has a much greater potential than using reflected light alone. This potential of light is best appreciated if you think of lighting as "painting with light," similar to how a decorator uses pigments for painting.
The expressive possibilities of lighting find extensive applications in relation to painting, sculpture, and architecture. A painting is an expression of light and the sculptor's product finally depends upon lighting for its effectiveness. Lighting is the master painter and sculptor. It may affect the values of a painting to some extent and it is a great influence upon the colors. It molds the model from which the sculptor works and it molds the completed work. The direction, distribution, and quality of light influence the appearance of all objects and groups of them. Aside from the modeling of ornament, the light and shade effects of relatively large areas in an interior such as walls and ceiling, the contrasts in the brightnesses of alcoves with that of the main interior, and the shadows under cornices, beams, and arches are expressions of light.
The expressive possibilities of lighting find extensive applications in painting, sculpture, and architecture. A painting showcases light, and a sculptor's work ultimately relies on lighting for its effectiveness. Lighting acts as the master painter and sculptor. It can impact the values in a painting to some degree and significantly influences colors. It shapes the model that the sculptor uses and also shapes the finished piece. The direction, distribution, and quality of light affect how all objects, and groups of objects, appear. Beyond merely modeling ornamentation, the light and shadow effects on relatively large areas within a space, such as walls and ceilings, the brightness contrasts between alcoves and the main room, and the shadows beneath cornices, beams, and arches are all expressions of light.
The decorator is able to produce a certain mood in a given interior by varying the distribution of values and the choice of colors and the lighting artist is able to do likewise, but the latter is even able to alter the mood produced by the decorator. For example, a large interior flooded with light from concealed sources has the airiness and extensiveness of outdoors. If lighted solely by means of sources concealed in an upper cornice, the ceiling may be bright and the walls may be relatively dark by contrast. Such a lighting effect may produce a feeling of being hemmed in by the walls without a roof. If the room is lighted by means of chandeliers hung low and equipped with shades in such a manner that the lower portions of the walls may be light while the upper portions of the interior may be ill defined, the feeling produced may be that of being hemmed in by crowding darkness. Thus lighting is productive of moods and illusions ranging from the mystery of crowding darkness to the extensiveness of outdoors.
The decorator can create a specific mood in a room by changing the distribution of light and choosing colors, and the lighting designer can do the same, but the latter can even change the mood set by the decorator. For instance, a large room filled with light from hidden sources feels airy and open like being outdoors. If it’s lit only by sources hidden in an upper cornice, the ceiling can be bright while the walls appear relatively dark, which may create a sense of being enclosed by the walls without a roof. If the room is lit by chandeliers hanging low with shades that illuminate the lower parts of the walls while leaving the upper parts of the room less defined, it may give the impression of being surrounded by overwhelming darkness. Therefore, lighting can create feelings and illusions that range from the mystery of deep darkness to the openness of the outdoors.
Future lighting of interiors doubtless will provide an adequacy of lighting effects which will meet the respective requirements of various occasions. A decorative scheme in which light and medium grays are employed produces an interior which is very sensitive to lighting effects. To these light-and-shade effects colored light may add its charming effectiveness. Not only are colored lighting effects able to add much to the beauty of the setting but they possess certain other powers. Blue tints produce a "cold" effect and the yellow and orange tints a "warm" effect. For example, a room will appear cooler in the summer when illuminated by means of bluish light and a practical application of this effect is in the theater which must attract audiences in the summer. How tinted illuminants fit the spirit of an occasion or the mood of a room may be fully appreciated only through experiments, but these are so effective that the future of lighting will witness the application of the idea of "painting with light" to its fullest extent. Color is demanded in other fields, and, considering its effectiveness and superiority in lighting, it will certainly be demanded in lighting when its potentiality becomes appreciated and readily utilized.
The future of interior lighting will definitely provide a variety of lighting effects that meet the needs of different occasions. A decorative scheme using light and medium grays creates an interior that responds well to lighting effects. Colored light can enhance these light-and-shadow effects with its captivating charm. Not only do colored lighting effects contribute to the beauty of a space, but they also have other qualities. Blue tones create a "cool" feel, while yellow and orange tones create a "warm" feel. For instance, a room will feel cooler in the summer when lit with bluish light, which is practically applied in theaters looking to attract audiences during the summer. The way tinted lights suit the spirit of an occasion or the mood of a room can only be fully realized through experimentation, but the effectiveness of these experiments suggests that the future of lighting will embrace the concept of "painting with light" to its fullest. Color is sought after in various fields, and given its effectiveness and superiority in lighting, it will definitely be in demand when its potential is fully recognized and utilized.
The expressiveness of light is always evident in a landscape. On a sunny day the mood of a scene varies throughout the day and it grows more enticing and agreeable as the shadows lengthen toward evening. The artist in painting a desert scene employs short harsh shadows if he desires to suggest the excessive heat. These shadows suggest the relentless noonday sun. The overcast sky is universally depressing and it has been found that on a sunny day most persons experience a slight depression when a cloud obscures the sun. Nature's lighting varies from moment to moment, from day to day, and from season to season. It presents the extremes of variation in distributions of light from overcast to sunny days and in the latter cases the shadows are continually shifting with the sun's altitude. They are harshest at noon and gradually fade as they lengthen, until at sunset they disappear. The colors of sunlit surfaces and of shadows vary from sunrise to sunset. These are the fundamental variations in the lighting, but in the various scenes the lighting effects are further modified by clouds and by local conditions or environment. The vast outdoors provides a fruitful field for the study of the expressiveness of light.
The expressiveness of light is always clear in a landscape. On a sunny day, the mood of a scene changes throughout the day and becomes more inviting and pleasant as the shadows stretch longer toward evening. An artist painting a desert scene uses short, sharp shadows if they want to convey the intense heat. These shadows indicate the relentless midday sun. An overcast sky is universally gloomy, and it has been found that on a sunny day, most people feel a slight depression when a cloud blocks the sun. Nature's lighting varies from moment to moment, from day to day, and from season to season. It displays extreme variations in light distribution, from overcast to sunny days, and in the latter cases, the shadows continuously shift with the sun's position. They are at their harshest at noon and gradually fade as they lengthen until they disappear at sunset. The colors of sunlit surfaces and shadows change from sunrise to sunset. These are the basic variations in lighting, but in different scenes, the lighting effects are further influenced by clouds and local conditions or environment. The vast outdoors offers a rich area for studying the expressiveness of light.
Having become convinced of this power of light, the lighting expert may turn to artificial light, which is so easily controlled in direction, distribution, and color, and draw upon its potentiality. Not only is it easy to provide a lighting suitable to the mood or to the function of an interior but it is possible to obtain some variety in effect so that the lighting may always suit the occasion. A study of nature's lighting reveals one great principle, namely, variety. Mankind demands variety in most of his activities. Work is varied and alternated with recreation. Meals are not always the same. Clothing, decorations, and furnishings are relieved of monotony. One of the most potent features of artificial light is the ease with which variety may be obtained. In obtaining relief from the monotony of decorations and furnishings, considerable expense and inconvenience are inevitably encountered. With an adequate supply of outlets, circuits, and controls a wide variety of lighting effects may be obtained with perhaps an insignificant increase in the initial investment. Variety is the spice of lighting as well as of life.
Having recognized the power of light, the lighting expert may turn to artificial light, which is so easily controlled in direction, distribution, and color, and make use of its potential. Not only is it simple to create lighting that matches the mood or purpose of a space, but it's also possible to achieve a variety of effects, ensuring the lighting fits any occasion. A study of natural lighting reveals one key principle: variety. People crave variety in most of their activities. Work is interspersed with leisure. Meals are not always the same. Clothing, decorations, and furnishings are designed to avoid monotony. One of the standout features of artificial light is how easily variety can be achieved. In seeking to relieve the sameness of decorations and furnishings, some expense and inconvenience often arise. With enough outlets, circuits, and controls, a wide range of lighting effects can be created with possibly only a minor increase in the initial investment. Variety adds spice to lighting just as it does to life.
These various principles of lighting are readily exemplified in the lighting of the home, which is discussed in another chapter. The church is even a better example of the expressive possibilities of lighting. The architectural features are generally of a certain period and first of all it is essential to harmonize the lighting effect with that of the architectural and decorative scheme. Obviously, the dark-stained ceiling of a certain type of church would not be flooded with light. The fact that it is made dark by staining precludes such a procedure in lighting. The characteristics of creeds are distinctly different and these are to some extent exemplified by the lines of the architecture of their churches. In the same way the lighting effect may be harmonized with the creed and the spirit of the interior. The lighting may always be dignified, impressive, and congruous. Few churches are properly lighted with a high intensity of illumination; moderate lighting is more appropriate, for it is conducive to the spirit of worship. In some creeds a dominant note is extreme penitence and severity. The architecture may possess harsh outlines, and this severity or extreme solemnity may be expressed in lighting by harsher contrasts, although this does not mean that the lighting must be glaring. On the other hand, in a certain modern creed the dominant note appears to be cheerfulness. The spacious interiors of the churches of this creed are lacking in severe lines and the walls and ceilings are highly reflecting. Adequate illumination by means of diffused light without the production of severe contrasts expresses the creed, modernity, and enlightenment. On the altar of certain churches the expressiveness of light is utilized in the ceremonial uses which vary with the creed. Even the symbolism of color may be appropriately woven into the lighting of the church.
These different principles of lighting are clearly shown in home lighting, which is covered in another chapter. The church is an even better example of how lighting can be expressive. The architectural features typically reflect a specific time period, and it's crucial to ensure the lighting works well with the architectural and decorative design. Clearly, a church with a dark-stained ceiling shouldn't be overwhelmed with light. The fact that it's dark from staining rules out that kind of lighting approach. The characteristics of different beliefs vary significantly, and these differences are somewhat represented in the lines of their church architecture. Similarly, the lighting can be matched with the beliefs and the atmosphere of the interior. Lighting can always be dignified, impressive, and fitting. Few churches are lit with bright, intense light; moderate lighting is more suitable as it supports the spirit of worship. In some beliefs, the main focus is on deep penitence and seriousness. The architecture may have harsh shapes, and this seriousness can be reflected in the lighting through stronger contrasts, though that doesn’t mean the lighting has to be harsh. On the other hand, in some modern beliefs, the focus tends to be on cheerfulness. The spacious interiors of these churches lack severe lines and have walls and ceilings that reflect a lot of light. Adequate illumination through diffused light, without creating strong contrasts, expresses modernity and enlightenment. In some churches, the expressiveness of light is used ceremonially, varying with the belief. Even the symbolism of color can be appropriately incorporated into the church's lighting.
The expressiveness of light and color originated through the contact of primitive man with nature. Sunlight meant warmth and a bountiful vegetation, but darkness restricted his activities and harbored manifold dangers. Many associations thus originated and they were extended through ignorance and superstition. Yellow is naturally emblematical of the sun and it became the symbol of warmth. Brown as the predominant color of the autumn foliage became tinctured with sadness because the decay of the vegetation presaged the death of the year and the cold dreary months of winter. The first signs of green vegetation in the spring were welcomed as an end of winter and a beginning of another bountiful summer; hence green symbolized youth and hope. It became associated with the springtime of life and thus signified inexperience, but as the color of vegetation it also meant life itself and became a symbol of immortality. Blue acquired certain divine attributes because, as the color of the sky, it was associated with the abode of the gods or heaven. Also a blue sky is the acme of serenity and this color acquired certain appropriate attributes.
The expressiveness of light and color came from early humans interacting with nature. Sunlight represented warmth and abundant plant life, while darkness limited their activities and brought many dangers. This led to various associations that grew through ignorance and superstition. Yellow naturally symbolizes the sun and became a representation of warmth. Brown, being the main color of autumn leaves, took on a sense of sadness because the dying vegetation signaled the end of the year and the cold, dreary winter months. The first signs of green in spring were welcomed as the end of winter and the start of another fruitful summer; therefore, green came to represent youth and hope. It was linked with the springtime of life, symbolizing inexperience, but as the color of plants, it also stood for life itself and became a symbol of immortality. Blue took on divine qualities because, as the color of the sky, it was connected to the home of the gods or heaven. A clear blue sky represents ultimate tranquility, giving this color certain fitting attributes.
Associations of this character became woven into mythology and thus became firmly established. Poets have felt these influences of light and color in nature and have given expression to them in words. They also have entwined much of the mythology of past civilizations and these repetitions have helped to establish the expressiveness of light and color. Early ecclesiasts employed these symbolisms in religious ceremonies and dictated the garbs of saints and other religious personages in the paintings which decorated their edifices. Thus there were many influences at work during the early centuries when intellects were particularly susceptible through superstition and lack of knowledge. The result has been an extensive symbolism of light, color, and darkness.
Associations like this became part of mythology and became well established. Poets have been inspired by these influences of light and color in nature and have expressed them in words. They also incorporated much of the mythology of past civilizations, and these repetitions helped to solidify the expressiveness of light and color. Early religious leaders used these symbols in ceremonies and dictated the clothing of saints and other religious figures in the paintings that decorated their buildings. Thus, there were many influences at play during the early centuries when people’s minds were especially vulnerable to superstition and lack of knowledge. The result has been a rich symbolism of light, color, and darkness.
At the present time it is difficult to separate the innate appeal of light, color, and darkness from those attributes which have been acquired through associations. Possibly light and color have no innate powers but merely appear to have because the acquired attributes have been so thoroughly established through usage and common consent. Space does not permit a discussion of this point, but the chief aim is consummated if the existence of an expressiveness and impressiveness of light is established. There are many other symbolisms of color and light which have arisen in various ways but it is far beyond the scope of this book to discuss them.
Right now, it's hard to distinguish the natural appeal of light, color, and darkness from the qualities we've learned through our experiences. It’s possible that light and color don’t have any inherent power; they just seem to because the learned qualities have been so deeply ingrained through use and general agreement. There's not enough space to dive into this topic, but the main goal is achieved if we recognize that light has its own expressiveness and impact. There are many other meanings and symbols associated with color and light that have emerged in different ways, but discussing them is far beyond the focus of this book.
Psychological investigations reveal many interesting facts pertaining to the influence of light and color upon mankind. When choosing color for color's sake alone, that is, divorced from any associations of usage, mankind prefers the pure colors to the tints and shades. It is interesting to note that this is in accord with the preference exhibited by uncivilized beings in their use of colors for decorating themselves and their surroundings. Civilized mankind chooses tints and shades predominantly to live with, that is, for the decoration of his surroundings. However, civilized man and the savage appear to have the same fundamental preference for pure colors and apparently culture and refinement are responsible for their difference in choice of colors to live with. This is an interesting discovery and it has its applications in lighting, especially in spectacular and stage-lighting.
Psychological studies reveal many intriguing facts about how light and color affect people. When selecting colors just for the sake of color, meaning without any practical associations, people tend to prefer pure colors over tints and shades. It's interesting to see that this aligns with the preference shown by primitive cultures in their use of colors for personal decoration and their environments. In contrast, modern societies often choose tints and shades for their living spaces. Nonetheless, both civilized individuals and those from primitive backgrounds seem to share a basic preference for pure colors, suggesting that culture and refinement influence their choices for everyday use. This discovery is fascinating and has implications for lighting design, particularly in theatrical and event lighting.
It appears to be further established that when civilized man chooses color for color's sake alone he not only prefers the pure colors but among these he prefers those near the ends of the spectrum, such as red and blue. Red is favored by women, with blue a close second, but the reverse is true for men. It is also thoroughly established that red, orange, and yellow exert an exciting influence; yellow-green, green, and blue-green, a tranquilizing influence, and blue and violet a subduing influence upon mankind. All these results were obtained with colors divorced from surroundings and actual usage. In the use of light and color the laws of harmony and esthetics must be obeyed, but the sensibility of the lighting artist is a satisfactory guide. Harmonies are of many varieties, but they may be generally grouped into two classes, those of analogy and those of contrast. The former includes colors closely associated in hue and the latter includes complementary colors. No rules in simplified form can be presented for the production of harmonies in light and color. These simplifications are made only by those who have not looked deeply enough into the subject through observation and experiment to see its complexity.
It has become clear that when modern individuals choose colors just for their own sake, they tend to prefer pure colors, especially those at the extremes of the spectrum, like red and blue. Women tend to like red the most, with blue coming in a close second, while men prefer the opposite. It's also well established that red, orange, and yellow have an energizing effect; yellow-green, green, and blue-green are calming; and blue and violet have a more subdued effect on people. These findings were made using colors taken out of context from their surroundings and practical applications. When using light and color, it's important to follow the principles of harmony and aesthetics, but the sensitivity of the lighting designer is a good guide. There are many types of harmonies, but they can generally be divided into two categories: those based on similarity and those based on contrast. The former relates to colors that are similar in hue, while the latter involves complementary colors. There are no straightforward rules for creating harmonies in light and color. Simplified guidelines are often put forth by those who haven't explored the subject deeply enough through observation and experimentation to appreciate its complexity.
The expressiveness of light finds applications throughout the vast field of lighting, but the stage offers great opportunities which have been barely drawn upon. When one has awakened to the vast possibilities of light, shade, and color as a means of expression it is difficult to suppress a critical attitude toward the crudity of lighting effects on the present stage, the lack of knowledge pertaining to the latent possibilities of light, and the superficial use of this potential medium. The crude realism and the almost total absence of deep insight into the attributes of light and color are the chief defects of stage-lighting to-day. One turns hopefully toward the gallant though small band of stage artists who are striving to realize a harmony of lighting, setting, and drama in the so-called modern theater. Unappreciated by a public which flocks to the melodramatic movie, whose scenarios produced upon the legitimate stage would be jeered by the same public, the modern stage artist is striving to utilize the potentiality of light. But even among these there are impostors who have never achieved anything worth while and have not the perseverance to learn to extract some of the power of light and to apply it effectively. Lighting suffers in the hands of the artist owing to the absence of scientific knowledge and it is misused by the engineer who does not possess an esthetic sensibility. Science and art must be linked in lighting.
The expressiveness of light is used in many areas of lighting, but the stage really offers untapped opportunities. Once you realize the endless possibilities of light, shade, and color as expressive tools, it's hard not to critique the rough lighting effects we see on stage today, the lack of understanding about the hidden potentials of light, and the superficial way this medium is often used. The blunt realism and the almost complete lack of deep understanding of light and color are the main faults of stage lighting nowadays. We look hopefully at the brave but small group of stage artists who are trying to create harmony between lighting, setting, and drama in what’s called modern theater. Unfortunately, they’re often overlooked by an audience that flock to melodramatic movies, where the storylines would likely get laughed at if presented on stage. These modern stage artists are working hard to harness the power of light. However, there are also fakes among them who haven’t accomplished anything worthwhile and lack the determination to learn how to effectively utilize light’s capabilities. Lighting suffers in the hands of artists who lack scientific knowledge and is misused by engineers who don’t have an artistic sensitivity. Science and art need to come together in lighting.
The worthy efforts of stage artists in some of the modern theaters lack the support of the producers, who cater to the taste of the public which pays the admission fees. Apparently the modern theater must first pass through a period in which financial support must be obtained from those who are able to give it, just as the symphony orchestra has been supported for the sake of art. Certainly the time is at hand for philanthropy to come to the aid of worthy and capable stage artists who hope to rescue theatrical production from the mire of commercialism.
The dedicated efforts of stage artists in some of the modern theaters are not supported by the producers, who focus on what the audience wants to see and pay for. It seems that modern theater needs to go through a phase where funding has to come from those who can afford to help, similar to how symphony orchestras have received financial backing to support the arts. Clearly, the moment has arrived for philanthropy to assist talented and deserving stage artists who aim to lift theater production out of the traps of commercialism.
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT HONORING THOSE WHO FELL AND THOSE WHO RETURNED
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT HONORING THOSE WHO FELL AND THOSE WHO RETURNED
Those who have not viewed stage-lighting from behind the scenes would often be surprised at the crudity of the equipment, and especially at the superficial intellects which are responsible for some of the realistic effects obtained. But these are the result usually of experiment, not of directed knowledge. Furthermore, little thought is given to the emotional value of light, shade, and color. The flood of light and the spot of light are varied with gaudy color-effects, but how seldom is it possible to distinguish a deep relation between the lighting and the dramatic incidents!
Those who haven't seen stage lighting from behind the scenes would often be surprised by how basic the equipment is, and especially by the shallow thinking behind some of the realistic effects achieved. But these outcomes are usually a product of experimentation rather than intentional knowledge. Also, little thought is given to the emotional impact of light, shade, and color. The broad sweep of light and the focused beam are mixed with flashy color effects, but it's rare to find a strong connection between the lighting and the dramatic moments!
THE EXPRESSIVENESS OF LIGHT IN CHURCHES
THE EXPRESSIVENESS OF LIGHT IN CHURCHES
In much of the foregoing discussion the present predominating theatrical productions are not considered, for the lighting effects are good enough for them. Many ingenious tricks and devices are resorted to in these productions, and as a whole lighting is serving effectively enough. But in considering the expressiveness of light the deeper play is the medium necessary for utilizing the potentiality of light. These are rare and unfortunately the stage artist appreciative of the significations and emotional value of light and color is still rarer.
In much of the earlier discussion, the current popular theater productions aren’t taken into account, because their lighting effects are adequate. These productions use many clever tricks and devices, and overall, the lighting works well enough. However, when it comes to the expressiveness of light, the deeper play is essential for harnessing the full potential of light. Such instances are uncommon, and sadly, the stage artist who understands the meanings and emotional significance of light and color is even rarer.
The equipment of the present stage consists of footlights, side-lights, border-lights, flood-lights, spot-lights, and much special apparatus. One of the severest criticisms of stage-lighting from an artistic point of view may be directed against the use of footlights for obtaining the dominant light. This is directed upward and the effect is an unnatural and even a grotesque modeling of the actors' features. The shadows produced are incongruous, for they are opposed to the other real and painted effects of light and shade. The only excuse for such lighting is that it is easily done and that proper lighting is difficult to obtain, owing to the fact that it involves a change in construction. By no means should the footlights be abandoned, for they would still be invaluable in obtaining diffused light even when the dominant light is directed from above the horizontal. In the present stage-lighting, in which the footlights generally predominate, the expressiveness of light is not satisfactory. Perhaps they are a necessary compromise, but inasmuch as their effect is unnatural they should not be accepted until it is thoroughly proved that ingenuity cannot eliminate the present defects.
The current stage setup includes footlights, side-lights, border-lights, flood-lights, spot-lights, and various other special equipment. One of the strongest critiques of stage lighting from an artistic perspective is aimed at using footlights as the main light source. This lighting comes from below and creates an unnatural, even grotesque, effect on the actors' faces. The shadows created are mismatched because they conflict with other real and painted light and shadow effects. The only justification for this kind of lighting is that it's easy to set up and proper lighting can be hard to achieve due to the need for changes in the construction. Footlights shouldn’t be completely discarded, as they can still be useful for creating diffused light, even when the main light comes from above. In the current stage lighting setup, where footlights typically dominate, the expressive quality of light is not effective. While they might be a necessary compromise, their unnatural effect shouldn’t be accepted until it’s clearly shown that creativity can’t resolve the existing issues.
The stage as a whole is a mobile picture in light, shade, and color with the addition of words and music. Excepting the latter, it is an expression of light worthy of the same care and consideration that the painting, which is also an expression of light, receives from the artist. The scenery and costumes should be considered in terms of the lighting effects because they are affected by changes in the color of the light. In fact, the author showed a number of years ago that by carefully relating the colors of the light with the colors used in painting the scenery, a complete change of scene can be obtained by merely changing the color of the light. Rather wonderful dissolving effects can be produced in this manner without shifting scenery. For example, a warm summer scene with trees in full foliage under a yellow light may be changed under a bluish light to a winter scene with ground covered with snow and trees barren of leaves. But before such accomplishments can be realized upon the stage, scientific knowledge must be available behind the scenes.
The stage is like a dynamic picture filled with light, shadows, and color, combined with words and music. Aside from the music, it’s a display of light that deserves the same attention and care that artists give to painting, which also captures light. The scenery and costumes should be viewed in terms of how they interact with lighting effects since they change with different light colors. In fact, the author demonstrated years ago that by carefully matching the colors of the light with the colors used in painting the scenery, you can completely transform a scene just by changing the light color. Pretty amazing dissolving effects can be achieved this way without moving any scenery. For instance, a warm summer scene with fully leafed trees under yellow light can be switched to a winter scene with a snow-covered ground and bare trees simply by using bluish light. However, for these techniques to be successfully implemented on stage, scientific knowledge is essential behind the scenes.
The art museum affords a multitude of opportunities for utilizing the expressiveness of light. This is more generally true of sculptured objects than of paintings because the latter may be treated as a whole. The artist almost invariably paints a picture by daylight and unless it is illuminated by daylight it is altered in appearance, that is, it becomes another picture. The great difference in the appearance of a painting under daylight and ordinary artificial light is quite startling, when demonstrated by means of apparatus in which the two effects may be rapidly alternated. Art museums are supposed to exhibit the works of artists and, therefore, no changes in these works should be tolerated if they can be avoided. The modern artificial-daylight lamps make it possible to illuminate galleries with light at night which approximates daylight. A further advantage of artificial light is that it may be easily controlled and a more satisfactory lighting may be obtained than with natural light. Considering the cost of daylight in museums and its disadvantages it appears possible that artificial daylight with its advantages may replace it eventually in the large galleries. If the works of artists are really prized for their appearance, the lighting of them is very important.
The art museum offers many opportunities to explore the expressiveness of light. This is especially true for sculptures compared to paintings, as the latter can be viewed as a complete piece. An artist typically paints a picture in natural light, and without it, the painting changes in appearance, effectively becoming a different work. The difference in how a painting looks under natural light versus regular artificial light is quite surprising when showcased using equipment that quickly switches between the two. Art museums are meant to display artists’ works, so any changes to these works should be avoided if possible. Modern artificial daylight lamps allow museums to light their galleries at night with a light that mimics daylight. Another benefit of artificial light is that it can be easily controlled, providing a more satisfying illumination than natural light. Given the challenges and costs associated with natural daylight in museums, it seems likely that artificial daylight, with its advantages, may eventually take over in large galleries. If artists' works are truly valued for their appearance, then how they are lit is crucial.
Sculpture is modeled by light and although it is impossible to ascertain the lighting under which the sculptor viewed his completed work with pride and satisfaction, it is possible to give the best consideration to its lighting in its final place of exhibition. The appearance of a sculpture depends upon the dominant direction of the light, the solid-angle subtended by the light-source (skylight, area of sky, etc.) and the amount of scattered light. The direction of dominant light determines the general direction of the shadows; the solid-angle of the light-source affects the character of the edges of the shadows; and the scattered light accounts for the brightness of the shadows. It should be obvious that variations of these factors affect the appearance or expression of three-dimensional objects. Therefore the position of a sculptured object with respect to the window or other skylight and the amount of light reflected from the surroundings are important. Visits to art museums with these factors in mind reveal a gross neglect in the lighting of objects of art which are supposed to appeal by virtue of their appearances, for they can arouse the emotions only through the doorway of vision.
Sculpture is shaped by light, and while we can't know for sure what lighting the sculptor used when admiring their finished piece, we can consider the best lighting for its display. A sculpture’s look relies on the main direction of light, the solid angle of the light source (like skylight, areas of the sky, etc.), and the amount of scattered light. The direction of the main light shapes the shadows, the angle of the light source influences the edges of those shadows, and scattered light determines how bright the shadows appear. It’s clear that changes in these factors can alter how three-dimensional objects look or express themselves. So, the placement of a sculpture relative to windows or other skylights and how much light bounces off nearby surfaces matters. When visiting art museums with these factors in mind, it's apparent that many artworks are poorly lit, even though their visual appeal is key to evoking emotions.
A century ago mankind gave no thought to utilizing the expressive and impressive powers of light except in religious ceremonies. It was not practicable to utilize light from the feeble flames of those days in the elaborate manner necessary to draw upon these powers. Man was concerned with the more pressing needs. He wanted enough light to make the winter evenings endurable and the streets reasonably safe. The artists of those days saw the wonderful expressions of light exhibited by Nature, but they dared not dream of rivaling these with artificial light. To-day Nature surpasses man in the production of lighting effects only in magnitude. Man surpasses her artistically. In fact, the artist becomes a master only when he can improve upon her settings; when he is able by rare judgment in choosing and in eliminating and by skill and ingenuity to substitute a complete harmony for her incomplete and unsatisfactory reality. But everywhere Nature is the great teacher, for her world is full of an everchanging infinitude of expressions of light. Mankind needs only to study these with an attuned sensibility to be able eventually to play the music of light for those who are blessed with an esthetic sense.
A hundred years ago, people didn’t think much about using the powerful and expressive qualities of light outside of religious ceremonies. It wasn’t feasible to use the weak flames of that time in a complex way to tap into those qualities. People were focused on more immediate needs. He wanted enough light to make winter evenings bearable and the streets relatively safe. The artists back then admired the amazing ways light was displayed by Nature, but they didn’t dare to imagine matching that with artificial light. Today, Nature still outshines humans in terms of the scale of lighting effects, but humans outshine her creatively. In fact, an artist truly becomes a master when they can enhance her settings; when they can create a complete harmony from the incomplete and unsatisfactory reality through careful selection, elimination, skill, and creativity. Yet, Nature remains the ultimate teacher, as her world is filled with an ever-changing array of light expressions. Humanity just needs to study these with a tuned sensitivity to eventually master the art of light for those who appreciate beauty.
XXIV
LIGHTING THE HOME
In the home artificial light exerts its influence upon every one. Without artificial lighting the family circle may not have become the important civilizing influence that it is to-day. Certainly civilized man now shudders at the thought of spending his evenings in the light of the fire upon the hearth or of a burning splinter.
In the home, artificial light affects everyone. Without it, the family setting might not have become the significant civilizing force that it is today. Clearly, modern humans now cringe at the idea of spending their evenings by the light of a fireplace or a burning stick.
The importance of artificial light is emphatically impressed upon the householder when he is forced temporarily to depend upon the primitive candle through the failure of the modern system of lighting. He flees from his home to that of his more fortunate neighbor, or he retires in his helplessness to awaken in the morning with a blessing for daylight. He cannot conceive of happiness and recreation in the homes of a century or two ago, when a few candles or an oil-lamp or two were the sole sources of light. But when the electric or gas service is again restored he relapses shortly into his former placid indifference toward the wonderfully efficient and adequate artificial light of the present age.
The importance of artificial light really hits home for a person when they're forced to rely on a simple candle due to a failure in the modern lighting system. They either flee to a neighbor's house who has power or resign themselves to wait until morning, grateful for the sunlight. It's hard for them to imagine happiness and fun in homes from a century or two ago when only a few candles or a couple of oil lamps provided light. Yet, when the electricity or gas service is restored, they quickly return to their previous indifference towards the incredibly efficient and sufficient artificial light we have today.
Until recently artificial light was costly and the householder in common with other users of light did not concern himself with the question of adequate and artistic lighting. His chief aim was to utilize as little as possible, for cost was always foremost in his mind. The development of the science of light-production has been so rapid during the past generation that adequate, efficient, and cheap artificial light finds mankind unconsciously viewing lighting with the same attitude as he displays toward his food and fuel bills. Another consequence of this rapid development is that mankind does not know how to extract the joy from modern artificial light. This is readily demonstrated by analyzing the lighting of middle-class homes.
Until recently, artificial light was expensive, and homeowners, like other users of light, didn’t really think about having enough or attractive lighting. Their main goal was to use as little as possible since the cost was always a top concern. The advancement of light-production technology has progressed so quickly in the last generation that people now regard lighting with the same mindset they have toward their food and energy bills. Another result of this rapid development is that many people don’t know how to truly enjoy modern artificial light. This is easy to see when we look at the lighting setups in middle-class homes.
The cost of light has been discussed in another chapter and it has been shown that it has decreased enormously in a century. It is now the most potential agency in the home when viewed from the standpoint of cost. The average householder pays less than twenty dollars per year for ever-ready light throughout his home. For about five cents per day the average family enjoys all the blessings of modern lighting, which is sufficient proof that cost is an insignificant item.
The cost of electricity for lighting has been covered in another chapter, and it has been shown that it has dropped significantly over the last century. It's now the most beneficial resource in the home when considering the expense. The average homeowner spends less than twenty dollars a year for constant light throughout their house. For about five cents a day, the typical family enjoys all the advantages of modern lighting, which clearly demonstrates that cost is a minor concern.
In order to simplify the discussion of lighting the home the terminology of electric-lighting will be used. The principles expounded apply as well to gas as to electricity, and owing to the ingenuity of the gas-lighting experts, the possibilities of gas-lighting are extensive despite its handicaps. There are some places in the home, such as the kitchen and basement, where lighting is purely utilitarian in the narrow sense, but in most of the rooms the esthetic or, more broadly, the psychological aspects of lighting should dominate. Pure utility is always a by-product of artistic lighting and furthermore, the lighting effects will be without glare when they satisfy all the demands of esthetics.
To make the discussion about home lighting easier, we'll use the terminology of electric lighting. The concepts we discuss apply to gas lighting as well, and thanks to the creativity of gas lighting experts, gas lighting options are quite broad, despite its limitations. In some areas of the home, like the kitchen and basement, lighting is mainly practical, but in most other rooms, the aesthetic or, more generally, the psychological aspects of lighting should take priority. Pure utility is always a result of artistic lighting, and additionally, the lighting effects will be glare-free when they meet all aesthetic requirements.
In dealing with lighting in the home the householder should concentrate his attention upon lighting effects. Unfortunately, he is not taught to do so, for everywhere he turns for help he finds the discussion directed toward fixtures and lamps instead of toward lighting effects. However, these are merely links in the chain from the meter to the eye. Lamps are of interest from the standpoint of quantity and quality of light, and fixtures are of importance chiefly as distributers of light. These details are merely means to an end and the end is the lighting effect. Of course, the fixtures are more important as objects than the wires because they are visible and should harmonize with the general decorative and architectural scheme.
When it comes to lighting in the home, homeowners should focus on the lighting effects. Unfortunately, they aren't taught to do this; everywhere they seek advice, the discussion centers around fixtures and lamps instead of lighting effects. However, these are just links in the chain from the power source to the eye. Lamps matter in terms of the quantity and quality of light, while fixtures mainly serve to distribute light. These details are just means to an end, and the ultimate goal is the lighting effect. Of course, fixtures are more significant as objects than the wires because they're visible and should match the overall decorative and architectural style.
The home is the theater of life full of various moods and occasions; hence the lighting of a home should be flexible. A degree of variety should be possible. Controls, wiring, outlets, and fixtures should conspire to provide this variety. At the present time the average householder does not give much attention to lighting until he purchases fixtures. It is probable that he thought of it when he laid out or approved the wiring, but usually he does not consider it seriously until he visits the fixture-dealer to purchase fixtures. And then unfortunately the fixture-dealer does not light his home; he does not sell the householder lighting-effects designed to meet the requirements of the particular home; he sells merely fixtures.
The home is the stage of life filled with different moods and occasions; therefore, home lighting should be adaptable. There should be some level of variety. Controls, wiring, outlets, and fixtures should work together to provide this variety. Nowadays, the average homeowner doesn’t pay much attention to lighting until it's time to buy fixtures. They might have thought about it when they planned or approved the wiring, but usually, it’s not taken seriously until they visit a lighting store. Unfortunately, the lighting store doesn’t really illuminate their home; they don’t offer lighting effects tailored to the specific needs of the home; they just sell fixtures.
Unfortunately there are few fixtures available which have definite aims in lighting as demanded by the home. Of the great variety of fixtures available there are many artistic objects, but it is obvious that little attention is given to their design from the standpoint of lighting. That the fixture-dealer usually thinks of fixtures as objects and gives little or no thought to lighting effects is apparent from his conversation and from his display. He exhibits fixtures usually en masse and seldom attempts to illustrate the lighting effects produced in the room.
Unfortunately, there are few light fixtures available that have clear objectives for lighting, as needed in homes. Among the wide variety of fixtures offered, many are artistic pieces, but it’s clear that design for effective lighting isn’t a priority. It's obvious from their conversation and displays that fixture dealers generally view these items as mere objects and pay little attention to the actual lighting effects. They typically showcase fixtures in bulk and rarely make an effort to demonstrate the lighting effects they create in a space.
The foregoing criticisms are presented to emphasize the fact that throughout the field of lighting the great possibilities which have been opened by modern light-sources are not fully appreciated. The point at which to begin to design the lighting for a home is the wiring. Unfortunately this is too often done by a contractor who has given no special thought to the possibilities of lighting and to the requirements in wiring and switches necessary in order to realize them. At this point the householder should attempt to form an opinion as to the relative values. Is artificial lighting important enough to warrant an expenditure of two per cent. of the total investment in the home and its furnishings? The answer will depend upon the extent to which artificial light is appreciated. It appears that four or five per cent. is not too much if it is admitted that the artificial lighting system ranks next to the heating plant in importance and that these two are the most important features of an interior of a residence. A switch or a baseboard outlet costs an insignificant sum but either may pay for itself many times in the course of a few years through its utility or convenience.
The previous criticisms highlight the fact that the incredible potential offered by modern light sources in the lighting field is often overlooked. The starting point for designing home lighting is the wiring. Unfortunately, this is frequently handled by a contractor who hasn’t given much thought to the lighting possibilities or the necessary wiring and switch requirements to make them a reality. At this stage, the homeowner should try to evaluate the relative importance of lighting. Is artificial lighting significant enough to justify spending two percent of the total investment in the home and its furnishings? The answer will depend on how much value is placed on artificial light. It seems that four or five percent is reasonable if we acknowledge that the artificial lighting system is second only to the heating system in importance, making these the two most critical elements of a home’s interior. A switch or a baseboard outlet is relatively inexpensive, but either can pay for itself many times over in a few years through its usefulness or convenience.
It appears best to take up this subject room by room because the requirements vary considerably, but in order to be specific in the discussions, a middle-class home will be chosen. The more important rooms will be treated first and various simple details will be touched upon because, after all, the proper lighting of a home is realized by attention to small details.
It seems best to approach this topic room by room since the needs can differ quite a bit. However, to keep things clear in our discussions, we'll focus on a middle-class home. We'll start with the most important rooms and briefly touch on various simple details because, in the end, achieving proper lighting in a home comes down to paying attention to those small details.
The living-room is the scene of many functions. It serves at times for the quiet gathering of the family, each member devoted to reading. At another time it may contain a happy company engaged at cards or in conversation. The lighting requirements vary from a spot or two of light to a flood of light. Excepting in the small living-rooms there does not appear to be a single good reason for a ceiling fixture. It is nearly always in the field of vision when occupants are engaged in conversation, and for reading purposes the portable lamp of satisfactory design has no rival. Wall brackets cannot supply general lighting without being too bright for comfort. If they are heavily shaded they may still emit plenty of light upward, but the adjacent spots on the walls or ceiling will generally be too bright. Wall brackets may be beautiful ornaments and decorative spots of light and have a right to exist as such, but they cannot be safely depended upon for adequate general lighting on those occasions which demand such lighting.
The living room hosts many activities. Sometimes, it's a quiet space for the family to gather while each member reads. At other times, it can be filled with a lively group playing cards or chatting. The lighting needs can range from just a couple of lamps to a bright, well-lit room. Aside from smaller living rooms, there's not really a solid reason to have a ceiling fixture. It usually interferes with sight lines when people are talking, and for reading, a well-designed portable lamp is unbeatable. Wall sconces can't provide general lighting without being too bright for comfort. If they are heavily shaded, they might still cast a lot of light upward, but the nearby wall or ceiling areas can end up too bright. Wall sconces can be beautiful decorative elements and serve as nice accents, but they can't be relied upon for sufficient general lighting when it’s needed.
As a general principle, it is well to visualize the furniture in the room when looking at the architect's drawings and it is advantageous even to cut out pieces of paper representing the furniture in scale. By placing these on the drawings the furnished room is readily visualized and the locations of baseboard outlets become evident. It appears that the best method of lighting a living-room is by means of decorative portable lamps. Such lamps are really lighting-furniture, for they aid in decorating and in furnishing the room at all times. A number of these lamps in the living-room insures great flexibility in the lighting, and the light may be kept localized if desired so that the room is restful. A room whose ceiling and walls are brilliantly illuminated is not so comfortable for long periods as one in which these areas are dimly lighted. Furthermore, the latter is more conducive to reading and to other efforts at concentration. The furniture may be readily shifted as desired and the portable lamps may be rearranged.
As a general rule, it's helpful to visualize the furniture in the room when reviewing the architect's drawings, and it’s even useful to cut out scaled pieces of paper representing the furniture. By placing these on the drawings, you can easily picture how the furnished room will look, and you can see where the baseboard outlets are located. The best way to light a living room seems to be with decorative portable lamps. These lamps are like lighting furniture because they help decorate and furnish the room at all times. Having multiple lamps in the living room allows for great flexibility in lighting, and you can keep the light focused where you want it to create a relaxing atmosphere. A room with bright ceilings and walls isn't as comfortable to spend long periods in as one that's dimly lit in those areas. Plus, the dimmer environment is better for reading and concentrating. You can easily move the furniture around as needed, and the portable lamps can be rearranged, too.
Such lighting serves all the purposes of the living-room excepting those requiring a flood of light, but it is easy to conceal elaborate lighting mechanisms underneath the shades of portable lamps. Several types of portable lamps are available which supply an indirect component as well as direct light. The former illuminates the ceiling with a flood of light without any discomforting glare. Such a lighting-unit is one of the most satisfactory for the home, for two distinct effects and a combination of these introduce a desirable element of variety into the lighting. Not less than four and preferably six baseboard outlets should be provided in a living-room of moderate size. One outlet on the mantel is also to be desired for connecting decorative candlesticks, and brackets above the fireplace are of ornamental value. Although the absence of ceiling fixtures improves the appearance of the room, wiring may be provided for ceiling outlets in new houses as a matter of insurance against the possible needs of the future. When ceiling fixtures are not used, switches may be provided for the mantel brackets or certain baseboard outlets in order that light may be had upon entering the room.
Such lighting serves all the purposes of the living room except for those that need a lot of light, but it’s easy to hide complex lighting systems under the shades of portable lamps. There are several types of portable lamps available that provide both indirect and direct light. The indirect light brightens the ceiling with a wash of light without any harsh glare. This type of lighting unit is one of the best for the home, as the two different effects and their combination add a welcome variety to the lighting. At least four, and ideally six, baseboard outlets should be installed in a moderately sized living room. Having one outlet on the mantel is also desirable for connecting decorative candlesticks, and brackets above the fireplace add ornamental value. While the lack of ceiling fixtures enhances the room's appearance, wiring for ceiling outlets in new homes can be a good precaution for future needs. When ceiling fixtures are not used, switches for the mantel brackets or certain baseboard outlets should be installed so that lights can be turned on upon entering the room.
The merits of a portable lamp may be ascertained before purchasing by actual demonstration. Some of them are not satisfactory for reading-lamps, owing to the shape of the shade or to the position of the lamps. The utility of a table lamp may be determined by placing it upon a table and noting the spread of light while seated in a chair beside it. A floor lamp may also be tested very easily. A miniature floor lamp about four feet in height with an appropriate shade provides an excellent lamp for reading purposes because it may be placed by the side of a chair or moved about independent of other furniture. A tall floor lamp often serves for lighting the piano, but small piano lamps may be found which are decorative as well as serviceable in illuminating the music without glare.
The benefits of a portable lamp can be assessed before buying by trying it out. Some aren’t great for reading lamps because of the shade shape or lamp placement. To evaluate a table lamp, simply set it on a table and observe how the light spreads while sitting next to it. Testing a floor lamp is also easy. A small floor lamp about four feet tall with the right shade makes an excellent reading lamp since it can sit next to a chair or be easily moved around without affecting other furniture. A tall floor lamp is often used for lighting the piano, but there are also small piano lamps that are both stylish and effective at lighting the sheet music without causing glare.
The dining-room presents an entirely different problem for the setting is very definite. The dining-table is the most important area in the room and it should be the most brilliantly illuminated area in the room. A demonstration of this point is thoroughly convincing. The decorator who designs wall brackets for the dining-room is interested in beautiful objects of art and not in a proper lighting effect. The fixture-dealer, having fixtures to sell and not recognizing that he could fill a crying need as a lighting specialist, is as likely to sell a semi-indirect or an indirect lighting fixture as he is to provide a properly balanced lighting effect with the table brightly illuminated. The indirect and semi-indirect units illuminate the ceiling predominantly with the result that this bright area distracts attention from the table. A brightly illuminated table holds the attention of the diners. Light attracts and a semi-darkness over the remainder of the room crowds in with a result that is far more satisfactory than that of a dining-room flooded with light.
The dining room presents a completely different challenge because the setup is very specific. The dining table is the most important part of the room and should be the brightest spot in the space. This point is clearly demonstrated. The decorator who designs wall brackets for the dining room focuses on creating beautiful art pieces rather than effective lighting. The fixture dealer, who has lights to sell and doesn't realize he could fulfill a real need as a lighting specialist, is just as likely to sell a semi-indirect or indirect lighting fixture as he is to provide a well-balanced lighting effect that keeps the table brightly lit. The indirect and semi-indirect fixtures primarily light up the ceiling, which leads to a bright area that distracts from the table. A well-lit table captures the diners' attention. Light draws people in, and a semi-darkness over the rest of the room creates a much more satisfying atmosphere than a dining room that’s flooded with light.
The old-fashioned dome which hung over the dining-table has served well, for it illuminated the table and left the remainder of the room dimly lighted. But its wide aperture made it necessary to suspend it rather low in order that the lamps within should not be visible. It is an obtrusive fixture and despite its excellent lighting effect, it went out of style. But satisfactory lighting principles never become antiquated, and as taste in fixtures changes the principles may be retained in new fixtures. Modern domes are available which are excellent for the dining-room if the lamps are well concealed. The so-called showers are satisfactory if the shades are dense and of such shape as to conceal the lamps from the eyes. Various modifications readily suggest themselves to the alert fixture-designer. Even the housewife can do much with silk shades when the principle of lighting the dining-table is understood. The so-called candelabra have been sold extensively for dining-rooms and they are fairly satisfactory if equipped with shades which reflect much of the light downward. Semi-indirect and indirect fixtures have many applications in lighting, but they do not provide the proper effect for a dining-room.
The old-fashioned dome hanging over the dining table did its job well, lighting up the table while keeping the rest of the room dim. However, its large opening required it to be hung quite low so that the lamps inside wouldn't be visible. It’s a noticeable fixture, and even though it provided great lighting, it has fallen out of favor. But good lighting principles never go out of style, and while tastes in fixtures change, the principles can still be used in new designs. Modern domes are available that work well for dining rooms, especially if the lamps are hidden. The so-called showers work fine too, as long as the shades are thick and shaped to hide the lamps from sight. Various modifications easily come to mind for a savvy fixture designer. Even a housewife can do a lot with silk shades once she understands the principle of lighting the dining table. The so-called candelabra have been widely sold for dining rooms and work decently if paired with shades that reflect most of the light downwards. Semi-indirect and indirect fixtures have many uses, but they don't create the right atmosphere for a dining room.
It is easy to make a special fixture which will send a component of light downward to the table and will permit a small amount of diffused light to the ceiling and walls. If a daylight lamp is used for the direct component, the table will appear very beautiful. Under this light the linen and china are white, flowers and decorations on the china appear in their full colors, the silver is attractive, and the various color-harmonies such as butter, paprika, and baked potato are enticing. This is an excellent place for a daylight lamp if diffused light illuminating the remainder of the room and the faces of the diners is of a warm tone obtained by warm yellow lamps or by filtering these components of the light through orange shades. The ceiling fixture should be provided with two circuits and switches. In some cases it is easy to provide a dangling plug for connecting such electric equipment as a toaster, percolator, or candlesticks. Two candlesticks are effective on the buffet, but usually the smallest normal-voltage lamps available give too much light. Miniature lamps may be used with a small transformer, or two regular lamps may be connected in series. At least two baseboard outlets are convenient.
It’s simple to create a special fixture that directs some light down to the table while allowing a bit of diffused light to reach the ceiling and walls. If you use a daylight lamp for the direct light, the table will look really beautiful. Under this lighting, the linens and china appear white, the flowers and decorations on the china show their true colors, the silver shines, and the various color harmonies like butter, paprika, and baked potatoes are tempting. This is a great spot for a daylight lamp if the diffused light that lights up the rest of the room and the diners' faces has a warm tone from warm yellow lamps or by filtering the light through orange shades. The ceiling fixture should have two circuits and switches. In some cases, it's easy to add a dangling plug to connect electric devices like a toaster, percolator, or candlesticks. Two candlesticks look nice on the buffet, but typically the smallest normal-voltage lamps available produce too much light. Miniature lamps can be used with a small transformer, or you can connect two regular lamps in series. At least two baseboard outlets are handy.
The foregoing deals with the more or less essential lighting of a dining-room, but there are various practicable additional lighting effects which add much charm to certain occasions. Colored light of low intensity obtained from a cove or from "flower-boxes" fastened upon the wall is very pleasing. If a cove is provided around the room, two circuits containing orange and blue lamps respectively will supply two colors widely differing in effect. By mixing the two a beautiful rose tint may be obtained. This equipment has been installed with much satisfaction. A simpler method of obtaining a similar effect is to use imitation flower-boxes plugged into wall outlets. Artificial foliage adds to the charm of these boxes. The colored light is merely to add another effect on special occasions and its intensity should never be high. In the dining-room such unusual effects are not out of place and they need not be garish.
The above discusses the basic lighting of a dining room, but there are several practical additional lighting effects that can really enhance certain occasions. Soft colored lights from a cove or from wall-mounted "flower boxes" are quite appealing. If you have a cove around the room, using two circuits with orange and blue bulbs will give you very different effects. Mixing the two can create a lovely rose tint. This setup has been installed with great satisfaction. A simpler way to achieve a similar effect is to use fake flower boxes plugged into wall outlets. Adding artificial greenery enhances the charm of these boxes. The colored lights are just for adding a different vibe on special occasions and should never be too bright. In the dining room, such unique effects are perfectly suitable and shouldn't be overdone.
The sun-room partakes of the characteristics of the living-room to some extent, but, it being smaller, a semi-indirect fixture may be satisfactory for general illumination. However, a portable lamp which supplies an indirect component of light besides the direct light serves admirably for reading as well as for flooding the room with light when necessary. Two or three baseboard outlets are desirable for attaching decorative or even purely utilitarian lamps. The sun-room is an excellent place for utilizing "flower-box" fixtures decorated with artificial foliage. In fact, a central fixture may assume the appearance of a "hanging basket" of foliage. The library and den offer no problems differing from those already discussed in the living-room. A careful consideration of the disposition of the furniture will reveal the best positions for the outlets. In a small library wall brackets may serve as decorative spots of light and if the shades are pendent they may serve as lamps for reading purposes. In both these rooms an excellent reading-lamp is desired, but it may be decorative as well. Wall outlets may be desired for decorative portable lamps upon the bookcases.
The sunroom shares some characteristics with the living room, but since it's smaller, a semi-indirect light fixture can work well for overall lighting. A portable lamp that provides both indirect and direct light is great for reading and brightening up the room when needed. Having two or three electrical outlets along the baseboards is useful for connecting decorative or functional lamps. The sunroom is a perfect spot for using "flower-box" fixtures adorned with fake plants. In fact, a central fixture could look like a "hanging basket" filled with foliage. The library and den don't present any unique issues compared to those already mentioned for the living room. Carefully arranging the furniture will help determine the best locations for outlets. In a small library, wall brackets can act as decorative light sources, and if the shades hang down, they can double as reading lamps. Both of these rooms should have a good reading lamp, and it can also be decorative. Wall outlets may be useful for decorative portable lamps on the bookcases.
The sleeping-room, which commonly is also a dressing-room, often exhibits the errors of a lack of foresight in lighting. In most rooms of this character there is one best arrangement of furniture and if this is determined it is easy to ascertain where the windows and outlets should be located. The windows may usually be arranged for twin beds as well as for a single one with obvious advantages of flexibility in arrangement. With the position of the bureau determined it is easy to locate outlets for two wall brackets, one on each side, about sixty-six inches above the floor and about five feet apart. When the brackets are equipped with dense upright shades, the figure before the mirror is well illuminated without glare and sufficient light reaches the ceiling to illuminate the whole room.
The bedroom, which often doubles as a dressing room, typically shows the mistakes from poor lighting planning. In most rooms like this, there is usually one ideal way to set up the furniture, and once that’s figured out, it’s easy to determine where the windows and outlets should go. The windows can often be arranged to accommodate both twin beds and a single bed, giving greater flexibility in the layout. Once the dresser's position is set, it's straightforward to plan for two wall brackets, one on each side, about sixty-six inches above the floor and roughly five feet apart. When the brackets have thick upright shades, the person in front of the mirror has good lighting without glare, and enough light reaches the ceiling to brighten the entire room.
A baseboard outlet should be available for small portable lamps which may be used upon the bureau or for electric heating devices. The same is true for the dressing-table; indeed, two small decorative lamps on the table serve better than high wall brackets owing to the fact that the user is seated. A baseboard outlet near the head of the bed or between the beds is convenient for a reading-lamp and for other purposes. An outlet in the center of the ceiling controlled by a convenient switch may be installed on building, as insurance against future needs or desires. But a single lighting-unit in the center of the ceiling does not serve adequately the needs at the bureau and dressing-table. In fact, two wall brackets properly located with respect to the bureau afford a lighting much superior for all purposes in the bedroom to that produced by a ceiling fixture.
A baseboard outlet should be available for small portable lamps that can be used on the dresser or for electric heating devices. The same applies to the vanity; in fact, two small decorative lamps on the table work better than high wall brackets because the user is seated. A baseboard outlet near the head of the bed or between the beds is handy for a reading lamp and other uses. An outlet in the center of the ceiling, controlled by an easy-to-reach switch, can be installed during construction as insurance against future needs or preferences. However, a single lighting unit in the center of the ceiling doesn’t adequately meet the needs at the dresser and vanity. In fact, two well-placed wall brackets in relation to the dresser provide much better lighting for all purposes in the bedroom than what a ceiling fixture can offer.
In the bath-room the principal problem is to illuminate the person, especially the face, before the mirror. Many mistakes are made at this point, despite the simplicity of the solution. In order to see the image of an object in a mirror, the object must be illuminated. It is best to do this in a straightforward manner by means of a small lighting-unit on each side of the mirror at a height of five feet. Both sides of the face will be well illuminated and the light-sources are low enough to eliminate objectionable shadows. The units may be merely pull-chain sockets containing frosted or opal lamps. A center bracket or a single unit suspended from the ceiling is not as satisfactory as the two brackets. These afford enough light for the entire bath-room. A baseboard or wall outlet is convenient for connecting a heater, curling-iron, and other electrically heated devices.
In the bathroom, the main issue is lighting the person, especially their face, in front of the mirror. Many mistakes happen here, despite the simplicity of the solution. To see an image in a mirror, the object needs to be well-lit. It's best to use a small light fixture on each side of the mirror, positioned about five feet high. This way, both sides of the face will be well-lit, and the light sources are low enough to avoid unwanted shadows. The fixtures can just be pull-chain sockets with frosted or opal bulbs. A center bracket or a single unit hanging from the ceiling isn’t as effective as two side brackets. These provide enough light for the whole bathroom. A baseboard or wall outlet is handy for plugging in a heater, curling iron, and other electrically heated devices.
OBTAINING TWO DIFFERENT MOODS IN A ROOM BY A PORTABLE LAMP WHICH SUPPLIES DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPONENTS OF LIGHT
OBTAINING TWO DIFFERENT MOODS IN A ROOM WITH A PORTABLE LAMP THAT PROVIDES BOTH DIRECT AND INDIRECT LIGHT
The sewing-room, which in the middle-class home is usually a small room, is sometimes used as a bedroom. A ceiling fixture will supply adequate general lighting, but a baseboard outlet should be available for a short floor lamp or a table lamp for sewing purposes. An intense local light is necessary for this occupation, which severely taxes the eyes. A so-called daylight lamp serves very well in this case.
The sewing room, which in a middle-class home is usually a small space, is sometimes used as a bedroom. A ceiling light will provide enough general lighting, but there should also be a wall outlet for a short floor lamp or a table lamp for sewing. Bright local light is essential for this task, which can strain the eyes a lot. A daylight lamp works great for this purpose.

THE LIGHTS OF NEW YORK CITY
Towering shafts of light defy the darkness and thousands of lighted
windows symbolize man's successful struggle against nature
THE LIGHTS OF NEW YORK CITY
Tall beams of light challenge the darkness, and countless lit windows represent humanity's triumph over nature.
In the kitchen the wall brackets are easily located after the positions of the range, work-table, sink, etc., are determined. A bracket for each is advisable unless they are so located that one will serve two purposes. It is customary to have a combination fixture for gas and electricity. This is often suspended from the center of the ceiling, but inasmuch as the gas-light cannot be close to the ceiling, the fixture extends so far downward as to become a nuisance. Furthermore, a light-source hung low from the center of the ceiling is in such a position that the worker in the kitchen usually works in his shadow. If a ceiling outlet is used it should be an electrical socket at the ceiling. The combination fixture is best placed on the wall as a bracket. The so-called daylight lamps are valuable in the kitchen.
In the kitchen, you can easily find the wall brackets after deciding on the locations of the stove, worktable, sink, and so on. It's a good idea to have a bracket for each item unless they are positioned in a way that one can serve two purposes. It's common to have a combined fixture for gas and electricity. This is often hung from the center of the ceiling, but since the gas light can't be too close to the ceiling, the fixture hangs down quite a bit, which can be annoying. Additionally, a light source that hangs low from the center of the ceiling puts the kitchen worker in their own shadow. If you use a ceiling outlet, it should be an electrical socket at the ceiling level. The combined fixture is best mounted on the wall as a bracket. Daylight lamps are also very useful in the kitchen.
In the basement a generous supply of ceiling outlets adds much to the satisfaction of a basement. One in each locker, one before the furnace, and a large daylight lamp above but to one side of the laundry trays are worth many times their cost. Furthermore, a wall socket for the electric iron and washing-machine is a convenience very much appreciated.
In the basement, a good number of ceiling outlets really enhance the overall experience of the space. There's one in each storage locker, one in front of the furnace, and a big daylight lamp positioned above but slightly to the side of the laundry trays, which are all worth way more than what they cost. Additionally, having a wall socket for the electric iron and washing machine is a convenience that's greatly appreciated.
In the stairways convenient three-way switches for each of the ceiling fixtures represents the best practice. A baseboard outlet in the upper hall affords a connection for a decorative lamp and pays for itself many times as a place to attach the vacuum-cleaner from which all the rooms on that floor may be served. In vestibules and on porches ceiling fixtures controlled by means of convenient switches are satisfactory. The entrance hall may be made to express hospitality by means of lighting which should be adequate and artistic.
In the stairways, having three-way switches for each ceiling fixture is considered best practice. A baseboard outlet in the upper hall allows for a decorative lamp and quickly pays for itself by serving as a spot to plug in the vacuum cleaner, covering all the rooms on that floor. In vestibules and on porches, ceiling fixtures controlled by easy-to-reach switches work well. The entrance hall can convey a welcoming atmosphere through lighting that is both sufficient and stylish.
An adequate supply of outlets and wall switches is not costly and they pay generous dividends. With a scanty supply of these, the possibilities of lighting are very much curtailed. There is nothing intricate about locating switches and outlets, so the householder may do this himself, or he may view critically the plans as submitted. The chief difficulties are to throw aside his indifference and to readjust his ideas and values. It may be confidently stated that the possibilities of lighting far outrank most of the features which contribute to the cost of a house and of its furnishings.
An adequate supply of outlets and wall switches isn't expensive, and they offer great benefits. With too few of these, the possibilities for lighting are significantly limited. There’s nothing complicated about locating switches and outlets, so homeowners can handle this themselves or critically review the submitted plans. The main challenges are overcoming indifference and rethinking their ideas and priorities. It can be confidently said that the possibilities for lighting greatly exceed most of the factors that contribute to the cost of a house and its furnishings.
After considering the requirements and decorative schemes of the various rooms the householder should be competent to judge the appropriateness of the lighting effects obtained from fixtures which the dealer displays, but he should insist upon a demonstration. If the dealer is not equipped with a room for this purpose, he should be asked to demonstrate in the rooms to be lighted. If the fixture-dealer does not realize that he should be selling lighting effects, the householder should make him understand that lighting effects are of primary importance and the fixtures themselves are of secondary interest in most cases. The unused outlets that have been installed for possible future needs may be sealed in plastering if the positions are marked so that they may be found when desired.
After thinking about the needs and design styles of the different rooms, the homeowner should be able to assess whether the lighting effects from the fixtures sold by the dealer are suitable. However, they should request a demonstration. If the dealer doesn’t have a space set up for this, they should be asked to show how the lighting will work in the actual rooms that need to be lit. If the fixture dealer doesn’t grasp that they should be focusing on lighting effects, the homeowner should clarify that lighting effects are the main priority, while the fixtures themselves are usually of secondary concern. Any unused outlets that have been installed for potential future use can be sealed with plaster as long as their locations are marked for easy access later.
An advantage of portable lamps is that they may be taken away on moving. In fact, when lighting is eventually considered a powerful decorative medium, as it should be, it is probable that fixtures will be personal property attached to ceiling, wall, and floor outlets by means of plugs.
An advantage of portable lamps is that they can be taken along when moving. In fact, when lighting is eventually seen as a significant decorative element, as it should be, it's likely that fixtures will become personal property connected to ceiling, wall, and floor outlets using plugs.
A variety of incandescent lamps are available. For the home, opal, frosted, or bowl-frosted lamps are usually more satisfactory than clear lamps. Bare filaments should not be visible, for they not only cause discomfort and eye-strain but they spoil what might otherwise be an artistic effect. Lamps with diffusing bulbs do much toward eliminating harsh shadows cast by the edges of the shades, by the chains of the fixtures, etc. These lamps are available in many shapes and sizes and the householder should make a record of voltage, wattage, and shape of the lamps which he finds satisfactory in the various fixtures. The Mazda daylight lamp has several places in the home and the Mazda white-glass and other high-efficiency lamps supply many needs better than the vacuum lamps. In brackets and other purely decorative lighting-units small frosted lamps are usually the most satisfactory. There is a general desire for the warm yellowish light of the candle-flame, and this may be obtained by a tinted shade but usually more satisfactorily by means of a tinted lamp.
A variety of incandescent bulbs are available. For home use, opal, frosted, or bowl-frosted bulbs are usually better than clear ones. Bare filaments should not be visible, as they can cause discomfort and eye strain, and ruin what could otherwise be an artistic effect. Bulbs with diffusing glass help reduce the harsh shadows created by the edges of the shades, the chains of the fixtures, and so on. These bulbs come in many shapes and sizes, and homeowners should keep a record of the voltage, wattage, and shape of the bulbs that work well in their various fixtures. The Mazda daylight bulb is handy in several areas of the home, and the Mazda white glass and other high-efficiency bulbs meet many needs better than traditional vacuum bulbs. In brackets and other purely decorative lighting fixtures, small frosted bulbs are usually the best choice. People generally prefer the warm yellowish light of candle flames, which can be achieved with a tinted shade, but is usually more effectively produced with a tinted bulb.
The householder will find it interesting to become intimate with lighting, for it can serve him well. The housewife will often find much interest in making shades of textiles and of parchment. Charming glassware in appropriate tints and painted designs is available for all rooms. In the bedchamber and the nursery some of these painted designs are exceedingly effective. Fixtures should shield the lamps from the eyes, and the diffusing media whether glass or textile should be dense enough to prevent glare. No fixture can be beautiful and no lighting effect can be artistic if glare is present. If the architect and the householder will realize that light is a medium comparable with the decorator's media, better lighting will result. Light has the great advantage of being mobile and with adequate outlets and controls supplemented by fixtures from which different effects are available, the householder will find in lighting one of the most fruitful sources of interest and pleasure. It can do much toward expressing the taste of the householder or if neglected it can undo much of the effect of excellent decoration and furnishing. Artificial lighting, softly diffused and properly localized, is one of the most important factors in making a house a home.
The homeowner will find it beneficial to familiarize themselves with lighting, as it can be quite useful. The homemaker will often find joy in creating shades from fabrics and parchment. Attractive glassware in fitting colors and designs is available for every room. In the bedroom and the nursery, some of these decorative designs are particularly effective. Fixtures should shield the lamps from direct view, and the diffusing materials, whether glass or fabric, should be thick enough to prevent glare. No fixture can be beautiful, and no lighting effect can be artistic if there is glare present. If both the architect and the homeowner recognize that light is a medium similar to those used by decorators, better lighting will be achieved. Light has the significant advantage of being versatile, and with enough outlets and controls, along with fixtures that offer various effects, homeowners will discover that lighting is one of the most rewarding sources of interest and delight. It can greatly reflect the homeowner's taste, and if overlooked, it can diminish the impact of beautiful decoration and furnishing. Artificial lighting, softly diffused and well-placed, is one of the most crucial elements in turning a house into a home.
XXV
LIGHTING—A FINE ART?
In the preceding chapters the progress of light has been sketched from its obscure infancy to its vigorous youth of the present time. It has been seen that progress was slow until the beginning of the nineteenth century, after which it began to gain momentum until the present century has witnessed tremendous advances. Until the latter part of the nineteenth century artificial light was considered an expensive utility, but as modern lamps appeared which supplied adequate light at reasonable cost attention began to be centered upon utilization, and the lighting engineer was born. Gradually it is being realized that artificial light is no longer a luxury, that it may be used in great quantity, and that it may be directed, diffused, and altered in color as desired. Although the potentiality of light has been barely drawn upon, the present usages surpass the most extravagant dreams of civilized beings a half-century ago. Mere light of that time was changed into more light as gas-lighting developed, and more light has increased to adequate light of the present time through the work of scientists.
In the earlier chapters, we've covered the journey of light from its unclear beginnings to its robust presence today. It's clear that progress was slow until the start of the nineteenth century, after which it started picking up speed, leading to remarkable advancements in our current century. Before the late nineteenth century, artificial light was seen as an expensive luxury, but the introduction of modern lamps that provided enough illumination at a reasonable price shifted the focus to practical use, giving rise to the lighting engineer. People are gradually realizing that artificial light is no longer just a luxury; it can be used abundantly and can be directed, diffused, and adjusted in color as needed. Although we have hardly tapped into the full potential of light, how we use it now far exceeds the wildest fantasies of civilization from just fifty years ago. The simple lighting of that era evolved into enhanced illumination with gas lighting, and through the efforts of scientists, we now have sufficient light available today.
It is apparent that a sudden enforced reversion to the primitive flames of fifty years ago would paralyze many activities. Much of interest and beauty would be blotted out of this brilliant, pulsating, productive age. It is startling to note that almost the entire progress in artificial lighting has taken place during the past hundred years and that most of it has been crowded into the latter part of this period. In fact, its development since it began in earnest has gone forward with ever-increasing momentum. On viewing the wonders of modern artificial lighting on every hand it is not difficult to muster the courage necessary to venture into its future.
It’s clear that suddenly going back to the basic lighting of fifty years ago would halt many activities. A lot of interest and beauty would disappear from this vibrant, thriving, and productive age. It’s surprising to realize that almost all the advancements in artificial lighting have happened in the last hundred years, with most of that occurring in the later part of this time. In fact, its development has progressed with increasing speed since it really took off. Looking at the amazing modern artificial lighting all around us, it’s easy to find the confidence needed to embrace its future.
The lighting engineer has been a natural evolution of the present age, for the economic aspects of lighting have demanded attention. He is increasing the safety, efficiency, and happiness of mankind and civilization is beginning to feel his influence economically. However, with the advent of adequate, efficient, and controllable light, the potentiality of light as an artistic medium may be drawn upon and the lighting artist with a deep insight into the possibilities of artificial light now has his opportunity. But the artist who believes that a new art may be evolved to perfection in a few years is doomed to disappointment, for it is necessary only to view retrospectively such arts as painting and music to be convinced that understanding and appreciation develop slowly through centuries of experiment and contact.
The lighting engineer has emerged naturally in today's world because the financial factors of lighting require attention. He is improving safety, efficiency, and the well-being of people, and society is starting to recognize his economic impact. However, with the rise of proper, efficient, and controllable lighting, the creative potential of light as an artistic medium can be explored, and the lighting artist who truly understands the possibilities of artificial light now has his chance. But the artist who thinks they can perfect a new art form in just a few years is setting themselves up for disappointment. A look back at the history of arts like painting and music shows that understanding and appreciation take centuries of experimentation and experience to develop.
Will lighting ever become a fine art? Will it ever be able alone to arouse emotional man as do the fine arts? Are the powers of light sufficiently great to enthrall mankind without the aid of form, music, action, or spoken words? It is safer to answer "yes" than "no" to these questions. Painting has reached a high place as an art and this art is the expressiveness of secondary or reflected light reinforced by imitation forms, which by a combination of light and drawing comprise the "subjects." A painting is a momentary expression of light, a cross-section of something mobile, such as nature, thought, or action. Light has the essential qualifications of painting with the advantages of a greater range of brightness, of greater purity of colors, and the great potentiality of mobility. If lighting becomes a fine art it will doubtless be related to painting somewhat in the same manner that architecture is akin to sculpture. With the introduction of mobility it will borrow something from the arts of succession and especially from music.
Will lighting ever be considered a fine art? Can it ever evoke emotions in people like traditional fine arts do? Is the power of light strong enough to captivate humanity without relying on shape, music, movement, or spoken words? It’s probably safer to say "yes" than "no" to these questions. Painting has achieved a prominent status as an art form, and this art expresses secondary or reflected light enhanced by imitating forms, which through a blend of light and drawing make up the "subjects." A painting captures a fleeting expression of light, a snapshot of something dynamic, like nature, thought, or action. Light possesses the essential qualities of painting but has advantages such as a wider range of brightness, purer colors, and the possibility of movement. If lighting evolves into a fine art, it will likely relate to painting in a way similar to how architecture relates to sculpture. With the addition of movement, it will also take inspiration from arts that involve progression, especially music.
The art of lighting in its present infancy is leaning upon established arts, just as the infant learns to walk alone by first depending upon support. The use of color in painting developed slowly, being supported for centuries by the strength of drawing or subject. The landscapes of a century ago were dull, for color was employed hesitatingly and sparingly. The colors in the portraits of the past merely represented the gorgeous dress of bygone days. But the painter of the present shows that color is beginning to be used for itself and that the painter is no longer hesitant concerning its power to go hand in hand with drawing. Drafting and coloring are now in partnership, the former having given up guardianship when the latter reached maturity.
The art of lighting is still in its early stages, relying on established techniques, just like a child learns to walk by first using support. The use of color in painting developed gradually, heavily relying on the strength of drawing or subject matter for centuries. Landscapes from a century ago were dull because color was used cautiously and sparingly. The colors in old portraits mostly represented the fancy clothing of the past. However, today’s painters are increasingly using color for its own sake, showing confidence in its ability to complement drawing. Drafting and coloring are now working together, with drawing stepping back as coloring has matured.
Lighting is now an accompaniment of the drama, of the dance, of architecture, of decoration, and of music. It has been a background or a part of the "atmosphere" excepting occasionally when some one with imagination and daring has given it the leading rôle. Even in its infancy it has on occasions performed admirably almost without any aid. The bursting rocket, the marvelous effects at the Panama-Pacific Exposition, and some of the exhibitions on the theatrical stage are glimpses of the potentiality of light. To fall back upon the terminology of music, these may be glimmerings of light-symphonies.
Lighting is now an essential part of drama, dance, architecture, decor, and music. It usually serves as a background or contributes to the "atmosphere," except sometimes when someone with imagination and boldness allows it to take the spotlight. Even in its early days, it sometimes performed impressively almost on its own. The exploding rockets, the stunning displays at the Panama-Pacific Exposition, and some performances on stage show glimpses of what light can do. To use musical terminology, these could be seen as the first signs of light symphonies.
Harmony is simultaneity and a painting in this respect is a chord—a momentary expression fixed in material media. A melody of light requires succession just as the melody in music. The restless colors of the opal comprise a light melody like the songs of birds. The gorgeous splendor of the sunset compares in magnitude and in its various moods with the symphony orchestra and its powers. Throughout nature are to be found gentle chords, beautiful melodies and powerful symphonies of light and this music of light exhibits the complexity and structure analogous to music. There is no physical relation between music, poetry, and light, but it is easy to lean upon the established terminology for purposes of discussion. Those who would build color-music identical to sound music are making the mistake of starting with a physical foundation instead of basing the art of light-expression upon psychological effects of light. In other words, a relation between light and music can exist only in the psychological realm.
Harmony is simultaneous occurrence, and in this sense, a painting is like a chord—a fleeting expression captured in physical form. A light melody unfolds over time, just as melodies do in music. The vibrant colors of an opal create a light melody, similar to birdsong. The stunning beauty of a sunset matches the scale and moods of a symphony orchestra and its capabilities. Throughout nature, we can find gentle chords, beautiful melodies, and powerful light symphonies, and this light music shows complexity and structure akin to music. There’s no direct connection between music, poetry, and light, but it’s easy to use the established language for discussion. Those who attempt to create color-music similar to sound music are mistakenly starting from a physical basis rather than grounding the art of light expression in the psychological effects of light. In other words, a relationship between light and music can only exist in the psychological domain.
These melodies and symphonies of light in nature are admittedly pleasing or impressive as the case may be, but are they as appealing as music, poetry, painting, or sculpture? The consensus of opinion of a large group of average persons might indicate a negative reply, but the combined opinion of this group is not so valuable as the opinion of a colorist or of an artist who has sensed the wonders of light. The unprejudiced opinion of artists is that light is a powerfully expressive and impressive medium. The psychologist will likely state that the emotive value of light or color is not comparable to the appeal of an excellent dinner or of many other commonplace things. But he has experimented only with single colors or with simple patterns and his subjects are selected more or less at random from the multitude. What would be his conclusion if he examined painters and others who have developed their sensibilities to a deep appreciation of light and color? It is certain that the painter who picks up a purple petal fallen from a rose and places it upon a green leaf is as thrilled by the powerful vibrant color-chord as the musician who hears an exquisite harmony of sounds.
These melodies and symphonies of light in nature are definitely enjoyable or impressive, depending on the situation, but are they as captivating as music, poetry, painting, or sculpture? A large group of average people might say no, but their collective opinion doesn't hold as much weight as that of a colorist or an artist who truly understands the beauty of light. The unbiased views of artists indicate that light is a highly expressive and impactful medium. A psychologist might argue that the emotional value of light or color doesn't match the appeal of an amazing dinner or many other everyday things. However, he has typically tested only single colors or simple patterns, and his subjects are largely chosen randomly from the crowd. What would his conclusion be if he studied painters and others who have developed a keen appreciation for light and color? It's clear that the painter who picks up a purple petal fallen from a rose and places it on a green leaf experiences the same thrill from the vibrant color combination as the musician who hears a stunning harmony of sounds.
Music has been presented to civilized mankind in an organized manner for ages and the fundamental physical basis of modern music is a thousand years old. Would the primitive savage appreciate the modern symphony orchestra? Even the majority of civilized beings prefer the modern ragtime or jazz to the exquisite art of the symphony. An appreciation of the opera and the symphony is reached by educational methods extending over long periods. An appreciation of the expressiveness of light cannot be expected to be realized by any short-cut. Most persons to-day enjoy the melodramatic "movie" more than the drama and relatively few experience the deep appeal of the fine arts. Surely the symphony of light cannot be justly condemned because of a lack of appreciation and understanding of it, for it has not been introduced to the public. Furthermore, the expressiveness of music is still indefinite at best despite the many centuries of experimenting on the part of musicians.
Music has been presented to civilized societies in an organized way for ages, and the basic principles of modern music are over a thousand years old. Would a primitive person appreciate the modern symphony orchestra? Even most civilized people today prefer modern ragtime or jazz over the intricate art of the symphony. Gaining an appreciation for opera and symphony music requires long-term educational efforts. Understanding the expressiveness of light cannot be achieved through shortcuts. Nowadays, most people enjoy melodramatic movies more than traditional theater, and relatively few connect with the deep appeal of the fine arts. The symphony of light shouldn’t be unfairly judged due to a lack of appreciation and understanding, as it hasn't been properly introduced to the public. Moreover, the expressiveness of music remains somewhat unclear, despite many centuries of experimentation by musicians.
If poetry is to be believed, the symphonies of light as rendered by nature in the sunsets, in the aurora borealis, and in other sky-effects of great magnitude have deeply impressed the poet. If his descriptions are to be accepted at their face-value, the melodies of light rendered in the precious stone, in the ice-crystal, and in the iridescence of bird-plumage please his finer sensibilities. If he is sincere, mobile light is a seductive agency.
If poetry is to be trusted, the stunning displays of light shown by nature in sunsets, the northern lights, and other magnificent sky phenomena have left a strong impression on the poet. If we take his descriptions at face value, the beautiful light reflected in gemstones, ice crystals, and the shimmering feathers of birds delight his more refined sensibilities. If he is genuine, shifting light is an enticing force.
The painter has contributed little of direct value in developing the music of light. He is concerned with an instantaneous expression. He waits for it patiently and, while waiting, learns to appreciate the fickleness of mood in nature, but when he fixes one of these moods he has contributed very little to the art of mobile light. Unfortunately the art schools teach the student little or nothing pertaining to color for color's sake. When the student is capable of drawing fairly well and is acquainted with a few stereotyped principles of color-harmony he is sent forth to follow in the footsteps of past masters. He may be seen at the art museum faithfully copying a famous painting or out in the fields stalking a tree with the hopes of an embryo Corot. The world moves and has only a position in the rank and file for imitators. Occasionally an artist goes to work with a vim and indulges in research, thereby demonstrating originality in two respects. Painting is just as much a field for research as light-production.
The painter hasn't really added much of real value to the music of light. He focuses on capturing a momentary expression. He waits patiently for it and, during that time, learns to recognize how moods in nature can change quickly. However, when he finally captures one of these moods, he hasn’t contributed much to the art of changing light. Unfortunately, art schools teach students very little about color for its own sake. Once a student can draw reasonably well and knows a few conventional color-harmony principles, they are pushed to follow in the footsteps of previous masters. You might find them at the art museum diligently copying a famous painting or out in the fields trying to paint a tree in hopes of becoming the next Corot. The world progresses, leaving only a spot for imitators. Occasionally, an artist tackles their work with enthusiasm and explores new ideas, thereby showing originality in two ways. Painting is just as much a field for exploration as light production.
Recently experiments are being made in the production of color-harmonies devoid of form. Surely there is a field for pure color-composition and this the field of the painter which leads toward the art of mobile light. Many of the formless paintings of the present day which pass under the banner of this ism or that are merely experiments in the expressiveness of light. Being formless, they are devoid of subject in the ordinary sense and cannot be more or less than a fixed expression of light. Naturally they have received much criticism and have been ridiculed, but they can expect nothing else until they are understood. They cannot be understood until mankind learns their language and then they must be understandable. In other words, there are impostors gathered around the sincere research-artist because the former have neither the ability to paint for a living nor the inclination to forsake the comparative safety of the mystery of art for the practical world where their measure would be quickly taken. This army of camp-followers will not advance the art of mobile light, but the sincere seekers after the principles of light-expression who form the foundation of the various isms may contribute much.
Recently, experiments are being conducted in creating color harmonies without form. There's definitely a space for pure color composition, which is the painter's domain that leads toward the art of dynamic light. Many of today’s formless paintings that fall under this ism or that are simply explorations of light's expressiveness. Lacking form, they don't have a subject in the traditional sense and can only be seen as a fixed expression of light. Naturally, they've faced a lot of criticism and ridicule, but that's to be expected until they're understood. They can't be understood until people learn their language, and then they must become understandable. In other words, there are pretenders surrounding the genuine research artist because they lack the talent to paint professionally and are hesitant to leave the relative safety of the mystery of art for the practical world, where their abilities would quickly be assessed. This band of followers won’t advance the art of dynamic light, but the sincere seekers of light expression principles, who form the basis of the various isms, can contribute a lot.
The painter will always be available with his finer sensibility to appreciate and to aid in developing the art of mobile light, but his direct contribution appears most likely to come from the present chaos of experiments in pure color-composition, in the psychology of light, or, more broadly, in the expressiveness of light. The decorator and the designer of gowns and costumes do not arrogate to themselves the name "artist," but they are daily creating something which is leading toward a fuller appreciation of the expressiveness of light. If they do not contribute directly to the development of the art of mobile light, they are at least aiding in developing what may eventually be an appreciative public.
The painter will always be around with his keen sensitivity to understand and help develop the art of mobile light, but his most direct contributions are likely to come from today’s chaotic experimentation with pure color composition, the psychology of light, or, more generally, the expressiveness of light. The decorator and the designer of gowns and costumes don’t claim to be called “artists,” but they are constantly creating work that moves towards a deeper appreciation of how light expresses itself. Even if they don’t directly contribute to the art of mobile light, they are at least helping to cultivate a public that will eventually appreciate it.
The artist paints a "still-life," the decorator creates a color-harmony of abstract or conventional forms, and the costumer produces a color-composition in textiles. The decorator and costumer approach closer to pure color-composition than the artist in his still-life. The latter is a grouping of objects primarily for their color-notes. Why bother with a banana when a yellow-note is desired? Why utilize the abstract or conventional forms of the decorator? Why not follow this lead further to the less definite forms employed by the costumer? Why not eliminate form even more completely? This is an important point and an interesting lead, for to become rid of form has been one of the perplexing problems encountered by those who have dreamed of an art of mobile light.
The artist paints a "still-life," the decorator creates a color harmony of abstract or traditional shapes, and the costumer designs a color composition in fabrics. The decorator and costumer get closer to pure color composition than the artist does with his still-life. The still-life is a collection of objects chosen mainly for their color qualities. Why include a banana if you just want a yellow hue? Why use the abstract or traditional shapes from the decorator? Why not push this idea even further with the less defined shapes used by the costumer? Why not remove form altogether? This is a significant point and an intriguing direction, as shedding form has been one of the challenging issues faced by those who aspire to create an art of dynamic light.
The painter who uses line and color imitatively has perhaps acquired skill in depicting objects and more or less appreciation of the beautiful. But if he is to be creative and to produce a higher art he must be able to use line and color without reference to objects. He thus may aid in the development of an abstract art which is the higher art and at the same time aid in educating the public to appreciate pure color-harmonies. From these momentary expressions of light and from the experience gained, the mobile colorist would receive material aid and his productions would be viewed by a more receptive audience or rather "optience" as it may be called. The development of taste for abstract art is needed in order that the art of mobile light may develop and, incidentally, an appreciation of the abstract in art is needed in all arts.
The painter who uses line and color in a traditional way might have developed skills in representing objects and some understanding of beauty. However, to be truly creative and produce a higher form of art, they must learn to use line and color without reference to objects. This approach can contribute to the growth of abstract art, which is considered a more advanced form of art, while also helping the public appreciate pure color harmonies. From these fleeting expressions of light and the experiences gained, the mobile colorist would gain practical support, and their works would be enjoyed by a more open-minded audience, or perhaps "optience," as it could be termed. Developing a taste for abstract art is essential for the advancement of the art of mobile light, and, by the way, an appreciation for abstraction in art is important across all forms of art.
Science has contributed much by way of clearing the decks. It has produced the light-sources and the apparatus for controlling light. It has analyzed the physical aspects of color-mixture and has accumulated extensive data pertaining to color-vision. It has pointed out pitfalls and during recent years has been delving further by investigating the psychology of light and color. The latter field is looked to for valuable information, but, after all, there is one way of making progress in the absence of data and that is to make attempts at the production of impressive effects of mobile light. Some of these have been made, but unfortunately they have been heralded as finished products.
Science has done a lot to clear things up. It has created light sources and tools for controlling light. It has examined the physical aspects of color mixing and gathered a wealth of data on color vision. It has identified potential issues and, in recent years, has been exploring the psychology of light and color more deeply. This area is expected to provide important insights, but ultimately, there’s a way to make progress even without complete data, and that’s by trying to create impressive effects with moving light. Some efforts have been made, but unfortunately, they’ve been presented as final products.
Perhaps the most general mistake made is in relating sounds and colors by stressing a mere analogy too far. Notwithstanding the vibratory nature of the propagation of sound and light, this is no reason for stressing a helpful analogy. After all it is the psychological effect that is of importance and it is absurd to attribute any connection between light-waves and sound-waves based upon a relation of physical quantities. No space will be given to such a relation because it is so absurdly superficial; however, the language of music will be borrowed with the understanding that no relation is assumed.
Perhaps the most common mistake is pushing the comparison between sounds and colors too far. Even though both sound and light travel in waves, that doesn’t mean we should emphasize this comparison. What really matters is the psychological impact, and it’s ridiculous to suggest there’s a link between light waves and sound waves just because of their physical properties. We won’t entertain that connection because it’s overly simplistic; however, we will use musical terminology with the understanding that no actual relationship is implied.
A few facts pertaining to vision will indicate the trend of developments necessary in the presentation of mobile light. The visual process synthesizes colors and at this point departs widely from the auditory process. The sensation of white may be due to the synthesis of all the spectral colors in the proportions in which they exist in noon sunlight or it may be due to the synthesis of proper proportions of yellow and blue, of red, green, and blue, of purple and green, and a vast array of other combinations. A mixture of red and green lights may produce an exact match for a pure yellow. Thus it is seen that the mixture of lights will cause some difficulty. For example, the components of a musical chord may be picked out one by one by the trained ear, but if two or more colored lights are mixed they are merged completely and the resultant color is generally quite different from any of the components. In music of light, the components of color-chords must be kept separated, for if they are intermingled like those of musical chords they are indistinguishable. Therefore, the elements of harmony in mobile light must be introduced by giving the components different spatial positions.
A few facts about vision will show the direction needed for developments in mobile light presentation. The visual process combines colors, which is quite different from the auditory process. The sensation of white can either come from combining all the colors of the spectrum in the proportions found in noon sunlight or from mixing the right amounts of yellow and blue, red, green, and blue, purple and green, among many other combinations. For instance, mixing red and green lights can create a perfect match for pure yellow. This illustrates how mixing lights can be complicated. For example, while a trained ear can identify the individual notes of a musical chord, when two or more colored lights are blended, they completely merge into a new color that’s usually quite different from the original colors. In the art of light, the components of color chords need to remain separate; if they blend together like musical chords, they become indistinguishable. Therefore, to create harmony in mobile light, the separate components must be positioned in different spaces.
The visual process is more sluggish than the auditory process; that is, lights must succeed each other less rapidly than musical notes if they are to be distinguished separately. The ear can follow the most rapid execution of musical passages, but there is a tendency for colors to blend if they follow one another rapidly. This critical frequency or rate at which successive colors blend decreases with the brightness of the components. If red and green are alternated at a rate exceeding the critical frequency, a sensation of yellow will result; that is, neither component will be distinguishable and a steady yellow or a yellow of flickering brightness will be seen. The hues blend at a lower frequency than the brightness components of colors; hence there may be a blend of color which still flickers in brightness. Many weird results may be obtained by varying the rate of succession of colors. If this rate is so low that the colors do not tend to merge, they are much enriched by successive contrast. It is known that juxtaposed colors generally enrich one another and this phenomenon is known as simultaneous contrast. Successive contrast causes a similar effect of heightened color.
The visual process is slower than the auditory process; lights can follow each other less quickly than musical notes if they are to be seen as separate. The ear can keep up with the fastest musical passages, but colors tend to blend together when they come one after another too quickly. This critical frequency, or rate at which colors start to blur, decreases with the brightness of the colors involved. If red and green are alternated at a rate that's faster than this critical frequency, you'll see a sensation of yellow; in other words, you won't be able to distinguish between the two colors and will perceive a steady yellow or a flickering yellow. The colors blend at a lower frequency than the brightness levels of those colors; therefore, it's possible to have a mix of colors that still flicker in brightness. You can achieve many strange results by changing the rate at which colors succeed one another. If this rate is so slow that the colors don’t merge, they are greatly enhanced by successive contrast. It's known that colors placed next to each other typically enhance one another, and this phenomenon is referred to as simultaneous contrast. Successive contrast creates a similar effect of intensified color.
An effect analogous to dynamic contrast in music may be obtained with mobile light by varying the intensity of the light or possibly the area. Melody may be simply obtained by mere succession of lights. Tone-quality has an analogy in the variation of the purity of color. For example, a given spectral hue may be converted into a large family of tints by the addition of various amounts of white light. Rhythm is as easily applied to light as to music, to poetry, to pattern, or to the dance, but in mobile lights its limitations already have been suggested. However, it is bound to play an important part in the art of mobile light because rhythmic experiences are much more agreeable than those which are non-rhythmic. Rhythm abounds everywhere and nothing so stirs mankind from the lowliest savage to the highly cultivated being as rhythmic sequences.
An effect similar to dynamic contrast in music can be achieved with moving light by changing the intensity or possibly the area of the light. Melody can easily be created through a simple sequence of lights. Tone quality has a parallel in the variation of color purity. For instance, a specific spectral color can be transformed into a wide range of shades by adding different amounts of white light. Rhythm can be applied to light just as it can to music, poetry, patterns, or dance, but its limits in mobile lights have already been pointed out. Nonetheless, it is sure to play a significant role in the art of mobile light because rhythmic experiences are far more enjoyable than non-rhythmic ones. Rhythm is everywhere, and nothing engages people, from the simplest tribes to the most sophisticated individuals, like rhythmic sequences.
Many psychological effects of light have been recorded from experiment and observation and affective values of light have been established in various other byways. It is possible that the degree of pleasure experienced by most persons on viewing a color-harmony or the delightful color-melody of a sunlit opal may be less than that experienced on listening to the rendition of music. However, if this were true it would offer no discouragement, because absolute values play a small part in life. Two events when directly compared apparently may differ enormously in their ability to arouse emotions, but the human organism is so adaptive that each in its proper environment may powerfully affect the emotions. For example, those who have sported in aërial antics in the heights of cloudland or have stormed the enemy's trench are still capable of enjoying a sunset or the call of a bird to its mate at dusk. The wonderful adaptability of the inner being is the salvation of art as well as of life.
Many psychological effects of light have been recorded through experiments and observations, and emotional values of light have been established in various other areas. It's possible that the level of pleasure most people feel when looking at a color scheme or the beautiful color display of a sunlit opal is less than what they experience when listening to music. However, if this is true, it shouldn’t be discouraging because absolute values matter little in life. Two events, when directly compared, may seem to differ significantly in their ability to evoke emotions, but the human mind is so adaptable that each one, in the right context, can strongly influence feelings. For instance, those who have enjoyed thrilling aerial feats in the heights of the clouds or have charged into an enemy trench can still appreciate a sunset or the call of a bird to its mate at dusk. The amazing adaptability of our inner selves is what sustains both art and life.
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT IN COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Community Affairs and Artificial Light
In the rendition of mobile light it is fair to give the medium every advantage. Sometimes this means to eliminate competitors and sometimes it means to remove handicaps. On the stage light has had competitors which are better understood. For example, in the drama words and action are easily understood, and regardless of the effectiveness of light it would not receive much credit for the emotive value of the production. In the wonderful harmony of music, dance, and light in certain recent exhibitions, the dance and music overpowered the effects of lights because they speak familiar languages.
In the way we use mobile light, it’s only fair to give the medium every advantage. Sometimes that means getting rid of competitors and other times it means removing obstacles. On stage, light has had competitors that are better understood. For instance, in drama, words and action are easily grasped, and no matter how effective the lighting is, it doesn’t get much credit for the emotional impact of the production. In the amazing combination of music, dance, and light in some recent shows, the dance and music overshadowed the lighting effects because they communicate in familiar ways.

PANAMA-PACIFIC EXPOSITION
Artificial light not only reveals the beauty of decoration and
architecture but enthralls mankind with its own unlimited powers
PANAMA-PACIFIC EXPOSITION
Artificial light not only showcases the beauty of decoration and architecture but also captivates humanity with its endless potential.
A number of attempts have been made to utilize light as an accompaniment of music and some of them on a small scale have been sincere and creditable, but a much-heralded exhibition on a large scale a few years ago was not the product of deep thought and sincere effort. For example, colored lights thrown upon a screen having an area of perhaps twenty square feet were expected to compete with a symphony orchestra in Carnegie Hall. The music reached the most distant auditor in sufficient volume, but the lighting effect dwindled to insignificance. Without entering into certain details which condemned the exhibition in advance, the method of rendition of the light-accompaniment revealed a lack of appreciation of the problems involved on the part of those responsible.
A number of attempts have been made to use light as a complement to music, and some of them, on a small scale, have been genuine and commendable. However, a much-publicized large-scale exhibition a few years ago lacked deep thought and sincere effort. For instance, colored lights projected onto a screen about twenty square feet in size were expected to compete with a symphony orchestra at Carnegie Hall. While the music could be heard clearly by everyone in the audience, the lighting effect became insignificant. Without getting into specific details that already criticized the exhibition, the way the light accompaniment was presented showed a misunderstanding of the issues involved by those in charge.
Incidentally, it has been shown that the composer of this particular musical selection with its light accompaniment was psychologically abnormal; that is, he was affected with colored audition. It is not yet established to what extent normal persons are similarly affected by light and color. Certainly there is no similarity among the abnormal and none between the abnormal and normal.
Incidentally, studies have shown that the composer of this particular musical piece, with its light accompaniment, had psychological issues; specifically, he experienced synesthesia with colors and sounds. It's still not clear how much normal people are influenced by light and color in a similar way. Clearly, there’s no resemblance between those who are abnormal and those who are normal.
If light is to be used as an accompaniment to music, it must be given an opportunity to supply "atmosphere." This it cannot do if confined to an insignificant spot; it must be given extensity. Furthermore, by the use of diaphanous hangings, form will be minimized and the evanescent effects surely can be charming. But finally the lighting effects must fill the field of vision just as the music "fills the field of audition" in order to be effective. There are fundamental objections to the use of mobile light as an accompaniment to music and therefore the future of the art of mobile light must not be allowed to rest upon its success with music. If it progresses through its relation with music, so much is gained; if not, the relation may be broken for music is quite capable of standing alone.
If light is going to be used alongside music, it needs the chance to create an "atmosphere." It can’t do that if it’s stuck in a small area; it needs to spread out. Also, by using sheer drapes, the shapes will be less noticeable, and the fleeting effects can definitely be enchanting. But ultimately, the lighting effects need to fill the entire view just like the music fills the sound experience to be effective. There are basic issues with using moving light as a companion to music, so the future of the art of moving light shouldn’t solely depend on its success with music. If it evolves through its connection with music, that’s a bonus; if not, the link can be cut since music can stand on its own just fine.
There is a tendency on the part of some revolutionary stage artists to give to lighting an emotional part in the play, or, in other words, to utilize lighting in obtaining the proper mood for the action of the play. Color and purely pictorial effect are the dominant notes of some of them. All of these modern stage-artists are abandoning the intricately realistic setting, and, as a consequence, light is enjoying a greater opportunity. In the more common and shallow theatrical production, lighting and color effects have many times saved the day, and, although these effects are not of the deeper emotional type, they may add a spectacular beauty which brings applause where the singing is mediocre and the comedy isn't comedy. The potentiality of lighting effects for the stage has been barely drawn upon, but as the expressiveness of light is more and more utilized on the stage, the art of mobile light will be advanced just so much more. Light, color, and darkness have many emotional suggestions which are easily understood and utilized, but the blending of mobile light with the action is difficult because its language is only faintly understood.
Some revolutionary stage artists tend to give lighting an emotional role in the play, or in other words, they use lighting to create the right mood for the action. Color and visual effects are some of the main focuses for a few of them. These modern stage artists are moving away from
It is futile to attempt to describe a future composition of mobile light. Certainly there is an extensive variety of possibilities. A sunset may be compressed into minutes or an opalescent sky may be a motif. Varying intensities of a single hue or of allied hues may serve as a gentle melody. Realistic effects may be introduced. The expressiveness of individual colors may be taken as a basis for constructing the various motifs. These may be woven into melody in which rhythm both in time and in intensity may be introduced. Action may be easily suggested and the number of different colors, in a broad sense, which are visible is comparable to the audible tones. Shading is as easily accomplished as in music and the development of this art need not be inhibited by a lack of mechanical devices and light-sources. The tools will be forthcoming if the conscientious artist requests them.
It's pointless to try to describe a future creation of mobile light. There are definitely endless possibilities. A sunset could be condensed into minutes, or an iridescent sky could be a theme. Different intensities of a single color or related colors could create a soft melody. Realistic effects may be included. The expressiveness of individual colors can serve as a foundation for developing various themes. These can be woven into a melody where rhythm in both time and intensity can be included. Action can be easily suggested, and the range of different colors, in a broad sense, is comparable to audible tones. Shading can be achieved as easily as in music, and the growth of this art doesn't have to be limited by a lack of mechanical devices and light sources. The necessary tools will be available if the dedicated artist asks for them.
Whatever the future of the art of mobile light may be, it is certain that the utilization of the expressiveness of light has barely begun. It may be that light-music must pass through the "ragtime" stage of fireworks and musical-revue color-effects. If so, it is gratifying to know that it is on its way. Certainly it has already served on a higher level in some of the artistic lighting effects in which mobility has featured to some extent.
Whatever the future holds for the art of mobile light, it's clear that we're just scratching the surface of how expressive light can be. It might be that light-music needs to go through a "ragtime" phase similar to the flashy fireworks and musical-revue color effects. If that's the case, it's good to see that progress is being made. It's already played a more significant role in some artistic lighting effects where mobility has been involved to some degree.
If the art does not develop rapidly it will be merely following the course of other arts. A vast amount of experimenting will be necessary and artists and public alike must learn. But if it ever does develop to the level of a fine art its only rival will be music, because the latter is the only other abstract art. Material civilization has progressed far and artificial light has been a powerful influence. May it not be true that artificial light will be responsible for the development of spiritual civilization to its highest level? If mobile light becomes a fine art, it will be man's most abstract achievement in art and it may be incomparably finer and more ethereal than music. If this is realized, artificial light in every sense may well deserve to be known as the torch of civilization.
If art doesn't evolve quickly, it will just follow the path of other art forms. A lot of experimentation will be needed, and both artists and the public will need to learn. However, if it does reach the level of fine art, its only competitor will be music, since that’s the only other abstract art form. Material civilization has advanced significantly, and artificial light has had a major impact. Could it be that artificial light will be key to elevating spiritual civilization to its highest point? If movable light becomes a fine art, it could be humanity’s most abstract artistic achievement and potentially far more elegant and ethereal than music. If this comes to fruition, artificial light in every sense may truly deserve to be called the torch of civilization.
READING REFERENCES
No attempt will be made to give a pretentious bibliography of the literature pertaining to the various aspects of artificial lighting, for there are many articles widely scattered through many journals. The Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society afford the most fruitful source of further information; the Illuminating Engineer (London), contains much of interest; and Zeitschrift für Beleuchtungswesen deals with lighting in Germany. H. R. D'Allemagne has compiled an elaborate "Historie du Luminaire" which is profusely illustrated, and L. von Benesch in his "Beleuchtungswesen" has presented many elaborate charts. In both these volumes lighting devices and fixtures from the early primitive ones to those of the nineteenth century are illustrated. A few of the latest books on lighting, in the English language, are "The Art of Illumination," by Bell; "Modern Illuminants and Illuminating Engineering," by Gaster and Dow; "Radiation, Light and Illumination," by Steinmetz; "The Lighting Art," by Luckiesh; "Illuminating Engineering Practice," consisting of a course of lectures presented by various experts under the joint auspices of the University of Pennsylvania and the Illuminating Engineering Society; "Lectures on Illuminating Engineering," comprising a series of lectures presented under the joint auspices of Johns Hopkins University and the Illuminating Engineering Society; and "The Range of Electric Searchlight Projectors," by Rey; "The Electric Arc," by Mrs. Ayrton; "Electric Arc Lamps," by Zeidler and Lustgarten, and "The Electric Arc," by Child treat the scientific and technical aspects of the arc. G. B. Barham has furnished a book on "The Development of the Incandescent Electric Lamp." "Color and Its Applications," and "Light and Shade and Their Applications," are two books by Luckiesh which deal with lighting from unique points of view. "The Language of Color," by Luckiesh, aims to present what is definitely known regarding the expressiveness and impressiveness of color. W. P. Gerhard has supplied a volume on "The American Practice of Gaspiping and Gas Lighting in Buildings," and Leeds and Butterfield one on "Acetylene." A recent book in French by V. Trudelle treats "Lumière Electrique et ses différentes Applications au Théatre." Many books treat of photometry, power-plants, etc., but these are omitted because they deal with phases of light which have not been discussed in the present volume. "Light Energy," by Cleaves, is a large volume devoted to light-therapy, germicidal action of radiant energy, etc. References to individual articles will often be found in the various indexes of publications.
No attempt will be made to provide an impressive bibliography of the literature related to the different aspects of artificial lighting, as there are many articles scattered across various journals. The Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society offers the most valuable source for more information; the Illuminating Engineer (London) contains a lot of interesting content; and Zeitschrift für Beleuchtungswesen focuses on lighting in Germany. H. R. D'Allemagne has compiled a detailed "Historie du Luminaire" that is richly illustrated, and L. von Benesch in his "Beleuchtungswesen" has presented many detailed charts. Both of these volumes illustrate lighting devices and fixtures from the earliest primitive ones to those of the nineteenth century. A few of the latest books on lighting in English include "The Art of Illumination" by Bell; "Modern Illuminants and Illuminating Engineering" by Gaster and Dow; "Radiation, Light and Illumination" by Steinmetz; "The Lighting Art" by Luckiesh; "Illuminating Engineering Practice," which is a series of lectures by various experts sponsored jointly by the University of Pennsylvania and the Illuminating Engineering Society; "Lectures on Illuminating Engineering," featuring a series of lectures presented under the joint sponsorship of Johns Hopkins University and the Illuminating Engineering Society; and "The Range of Electric Searchlight Projectors" by Rey; "The Electric Arc" by Mrs. Ayrton; "Electric Arc Lamps" by Zeidler and Lustgarten; and "The Electric Arc" by Child, which cover the scientific and technical aspects of the arc. G. B. Barham has provided a book on "The Development of the Incandescent Electric Lamp." "Color and Its Applications" and "Light and Shade and Their Applications" are two books by Luckiesh that discuss lighting from unique perspectives. "The Language of Color," also by Luckiesh, aims to present what is definitively known regarding the expressiveness and impact of color. W. P. Gerhard has authored a volume on "The American Practice of Gaspiping and Gas Lighting in Buildings," while Leeds and Butterfield cover "Acetylene." A recent French book by V. Trudelle addresses "Lumière Electrique et ses différentes Applications au Théatre." Many books discuss photometry, power plants, etc., but these are omitted here because they cover aspects of light not addressed in this volume. "Light Energy" by Cleaves is a comprehensive volume focused on light therapy, the germicidal effects of radiant energy, and more. References to individual articles can often be found in the various indexes of publications.
THE END
THE END
INDEX
- Aaron, 43
- Accidents: 8;
- Acetylene: 62;
- Actinic rays: effect of, upon human organism, 275
- Africa, public lighting in ancient, 31
- Agni, god of fire, 40
- Air-pump, 130
- Air-raids, 225
- Alaska, 18, 29
- Alchemy, 20
- Aleutians, 18
- Alexandria, 43, 163
- Allylene, 106
- Aluminum, 108, 179, 180
- Amiens, Treaty of, 69
- Amylene, 106
- Aniline dyes, 106
- Animal: distinction between, and human being, 3; 15;
- Antimony, 294
- Antioch, 153
- Arago, 114, 196
- Archbishop of Canterbury, 49
- Archimedes, 19
- Arc: lamps, 69, 89;
- electric, 111 et seq.;
- distinction between spark and, 112;
- Davy's notes on electric, 113;
- formation of, 115, 116;
- Staite and enclosed, 117, 118;
- principle of enclosed, 118, 119;
- types of, 120;
- flame-, 121, 122;
- luminous, 122;
- electric, 127;
- luminous efficiency of electric (table), 124; 160 et seq.;
- -lamp in lighthouses, 168 et seq.;
- magnetite-, 187; 261
- Ardois system of signaling, 199
- Argand, Ami: 52;
- Argon, 137
- Aristophanes, "The Clouds," 19
- Art Museums, 9, 13, 322, 323
- Asbestos, 170
- Asia: public lighting in ancient, 31, 39
- Automobiles, 238
- Babylon, 39
- Bacteria: effect of artificial light upon, 272 et seq.; 281, 282
- Bailey, Prof. L. H., 250
- Baltimore, 98
- Bamboo: carbon filaments, 169
- Bartholdi, 302, 303
- Beacons. See Lighthouses.
- Beck, 186
- Beecher, 72
- Beeswax, 35, 51
- Benzene, 106
- Bible, cited on importance of artificial light, 42-44
- "Bluebird, The," Maeterlinck, 9
- Blue-prints, 261
- Bollman, 98
- Bolton, von, 132, 133
- Bombs, illuminating, 182 et seq.
- Boston Light, 164, 165, 166, 177
- Bowditch, production of regenerative lamp by, 78, 79
- Boy Scouts, 17
- Bremer, 120
- Bristol University, 252
- Brush, 68, 159
- Building, 8
- Bunsen, 81, 85, 89, 148, 149
- Bureau of Mines: cited on open flames, 234; 236
- Burning-glasses, 19, 20.
- See also Lenses.
- Butylene, 106
- Byzantium, 34
- Cæsar, 163
- Canada, 254
- Candle-hour, defined, 215
- Candles: progress and, 7; 25, 28, 29, 30, 33;
- Calcium, 107, 108
- Carbolic acid, 106
- Carbon: 53, 80, 81;
- Carbon filament: 127 et seq.;
- Carbons, formation of, 115, 116
- Carbureted hydrogen, 75
- Carcel, invention of clockwork lamp by, 54, 55
- Cat-gut, 130
- Ceria, 85, 101
- Charleston, S. C., 185
- Charcoal: 113;
- uses of, for electrodes, 115
- Chartered Gas Light and Coke Co., London, 74
- Chemistry: artificial light and, 256-268
- Chicago, 62, 304, 305
- Chimneys, 54, 60, 62
- China, 19, 31, 32
- Chlorate of potash, 22
- Christ, 33, 46, 47
- Christians, "children of light," 42
- Christmas trees, 43, 304
- Chromium, 294
- Church of England, 49
- Cities: economy of artificial lighting in congested, 13
- Civilization: effect of artificial light upon, 4 et seq.;
- fire and, 15
- Clark, Parker and, 139
- Clayton, Dr.: invention of portable gas-light by, 64;
- Claude, 147
- Cleaves, Dr., quoted, 276, 277
- Clegg, Samuel: 74;
- Cleveland, 159
- "Clouds, The," Aristophanes, 19
- Coal: 32;
- Coal-gas: 63 et seq.;
- Coal-mines, 234 et seq.
- Cobalt, 294
- Coke, 68, 105
- Cologne, 157, 158
- Colomb, Philip, 197
- Color: 9;
- relation of artificial light to, 284 et seq.
- Colza, 31, 52, 167
- Combustion, 82 et seq.
- Commerce, 8, 97
- Constantine, 42
- Copper, 262, 295
- Cornwall, 63
- Cotton: 101;
- Cromartie, 78
- Crookes, 90, 146
- Crosley, Samuel, improvement of gas-meter by, 76
- Crusies, 32
- Daguerre, 258
- Dancing, 346
- Davy, Sir Humphrey: 33, 68, 73;
- Daylight, artificial, 12: 284 et seq.;
- application of, 287
- Daylighting, 12-14
- Dollond, 195
- Doty, 61, 167
- Drake, Col. E. L., discovery of oil in Pennsylvania by, 56
- Drummond, Thomas: 171, 185, 196;
- quoted on signaling, 197
- Dudgeon, Miss, 251, 252
- Dyes, 256, 265
- East Indies, 29
- Eddystone Light, 166, 167
- Edison: and problem of electric incandescent filament lamps, 128 et seq.; 129;
- quoted on birth of incandescent lamp, 130
- Edward I, 274
- Edward VI, 49
- Efficiency, effect of artificial light upon, 14
- Eggs: relation of artificial light to production of, 247, 248
- Egypt: 31;
- Electric filament: 81, 127 et seq.:
- approximate value of, lamps (table), 138
- Electric pile: construction of, 111; 127
- Electricity: 13, 22;
- Electromagnetic waves, 68, 86, 87
- Electromagnets, 114, 116
- Electrodes, 113, 114, 115 et seq.;
- life of, 122
- Elizabeth, Queen, 274
- England: 32;
- Erbia, 85
- Esquimaux: 18;
- use of artificial light by, 31
- Ethylene, 106
- Factories: 13;
- artificial light in, 239 et seq.
- Faraday, 113
- Filaments, carbon, 129 et seq.
- Finsen: 273, 274, 275;
- Fire: importance of, to man, 5 et seq.;
- Fireflies: 24, 81, 96, 148, 149, 150
- "First Men in the Moon, The," H. G. Wells, cited, 148
- Fish: artificial light as bait for, 249
- Flame-arcs, 120, 121, 122, 187
- Flames: 86, 88, 89;
- Flint, 33
- Fool's gold, 18
- Fort Wagner, 185
- France: lamps in, 55;
- early gas-light in, 72
- Franchot, invention of moderator lamps by, 55
- Frankland, 77
- Franklin, Benjamin: 165;
- Fresnel, 167, 196
- Friction, 16, 17
- Gas: 13, 22;
- discovery of coal, 32, 33;
- early uses of, as light-source, 63 et seq.;
- installment of, pipes in England, 63, 64;
- Shirley's report on Natural, 66, 67;
- first public display of, lighting, 69;
- cost of, lighting, 71;
- first attempt at industrial, lighting, 72;
- first English, company, 74;
- first, explosion, 75;
- house, lighting, 76, 77; 80, 82;
- spectrum of, 90;
- modern, lighting industry, 97 et seq.;
- origin of lighting by, 98;
- first, works in America, 98;
- growth of, consumption in United States, 99;
- electrical ignition applied to, lighting, 102;
- pressure, 102, 103;
- water, 105;
- carbons in, 106;
- production of Pintsch, 109, 110;
- salts applied to, flames, 120; 157;
- Census Bureau figures on cost of, plants, 221, 222; 224, 341
- Gas-burners: 63, 64, 77;
- Gas-mantle: 61, 81;
- Gas-meter, Clegg's, 76
- Gasolene: lamps, 55; 57
- Gassiot, 114
- Gauss, 196
- Geissler, 146
- General Electric Company, 132, 135, 136
- Germany: development of lamps in, 56;
- early gas-lighting in, 72
- Glass, 195, 290 et seq.
- Glowers, 139
- Glow-worms, 24
- Glycerides, 52
- Gold, 293
- Gout, 275
- Gramme dynamo, 117
- Grass: 18;
- carbon filaments, 129
- Greece: 39;
- Greenhouses, carbon-filament lamps in, 250 et seq.
- Hall of Fame, 134
- Happiness, effect of artificial light upon, 14
- Hayden and Steinmetz, 253
- Health, artificial light in relation to, 269-283
- Helium, 89
- Hemig, 155
- Hemp, 21
- Henry, William, 75
- Herodotus, 56
- Hertz, 68
- Hertzian waves, 271
- Hewitt, Cooper, produces mercury-arcs, 124, 125
- Home: artificial light in relation to, 6;
- lighting, 325 et seq.
- Hindu: light in, ceremonials, 40
- Hudson-Fulton Celebration, 306
- Huygens, 195
- Hydrocarbons, 82
- Hydrogen, 81
- Illiteracy, artificial light and, 9
- Invention, 7, 97
- Iowa, 238
- Iridium, 129
- Iron, 18, 262, 294
- Iron pyrites, 18
- Italy, 249
- Jablochkov: electric candle of, 117
- Jamaica, 19
- Jandus, 118, 122
- Japan: 19;
- Jerusalem, 43
- Jews: artificial light among, 40
- Journal, Paris, quoted, 210-212
- Laboratories: achievements of, 137
- Lamps: 16, 25;
- Roman, 30; 31;
- invention of safety, 33;
- ancient funereal, 39;
- sacred, of antiquity, 41;
- ceremonial, 44;
- scientific development of oil, 51 et seq.;
- Holliday, 55;
- Carcel, 54, 55;
- Franchot's moderator, 55;
- gasolene, 55;
- development of, in Germany, 56;
- air pressure, 61;
- supremacy of oil, ends, 62;
- Bowditch's, 77, 78; 80, 97;
- mercury-arc, 126;
- electric incandescent filament, 127 et seq.;
- gem, 132;
- tungsten, 133 et seq.;
- luminous efficiency (table) of incandescent filament, 141; 299;
- in home, 328-333
- Lange, 167
- Lard-oil, 51
- Lavoisier, 195
- Lead, 262, 294
- Le Bon, 72
- "Legend of Montrose, The," Scott, cited on primitive lighting, 27
- Leigh, Edmund, quoted, 226
- Lenses, 20, 171 et seq.
- Libanius, quoted, 153, 154
- Liberty, Statue of, 301, 302, 303
- Libraries, 9
- Light: relation of artificial, to progress, 3 et seq.;
- as a civilizing agency, 3-14;
- primitive man and artificial, 4;
- Milton, quoted on importance of, 5;
- artificial, and science, 7;
- artificial, and industrial development, 8;
- Maeterlinck's tribute to, 9;
- Lincoln's debt to artificial, 9;
- symbolism of, 9, 10;
- therapy, 10;
- in war, 11;
- adaptations of, 12; 13;
- mythical origin of artificial, 16;
- earliest source of, 16;
- production of, in stone age, 18;
- matches as source of, 21;
- animals as, sources, 24, 25;
- primitive sources of, 24-37;
- evolution of artificial, sources, 24-37;
- development, 28 et seq.;
- early outdoor use of artificial, 28;
- Roman uses of artificial, 30;
- beginning of scientific, 33, 34;
- candles as modern, source, 36, 37;
- symbolism and religious uses of, 38 et seq.;
- Bible cited on artificial, 42-44;
- in relation to worship, 43, 45, 46;
- Argand's contribution to, 53, 54;
- coal as, source, 55;
- early uses of gas as, source, 63 et seq.;
- as a public utility, 70;
- first installation of industrial gas, 72;
- science of, production, 80 et seq.;
- causes of, radiation, 80, 81; 83;
- lime, 84; electric, 89 et seq.;
- principle of, production, 90, 91;
- sources, 93;
- various gas-burners', supply, 95;
- relative efficiency of, sources, 95, 96;
- in the home, 97;
- influence of, upon science, invention, and commerce, 97 et seq.;
- yield of acetylene, 106, 107;
- electric, 109;
- influence of gas upon development of artificial, 110;
- development of artificial, 111 et seq.;
- efforts to improve color of mercury-arc, 125;
- electric-incandescent-filament, 127 et seq.;
- effect of tungsten, upon, 133 et seq.;
- of the future, 143-152;
- in warfare, 178-193;
- signaling, 194-207;
- cost of, 208-224;
- and safety, 225 et seq.;
- improper use of, 229, 230;
- comparison of daylight and artificial, 240;
- reducing action of, 258;
- bactericidal action of, 272 et seq.;
- modifying, 284 et seq.;
- spectacular uses of, 298-309;
- expressiveness of, 310-324;
- utility of modern, 325-340;
- evolution of the art of applying, 341-356;
- mobile, 347, 348, 349, 350;
- psychological effect of, 351 et seq.;
- as an accompaniment to music, 352-354
- Light-buoys, 10, 169
- Lighthouses: 10, 163-177;
- optical apparatus of, 172 et seq.
- Light-ships, 10, 169
- Lighting-systems: comparison of, 12-14
- Lime, 84, 107, 108, 294
- Lincoln, Abraham, 9
- Linen, 18
- Link-buoys, 28
- Lithopone, 265, 266
- Liverpool, 167
- Living: comparison of, standards, 238 et seq.
- London, 152, 154, 155, 156, 157, 202
- London Gas Light and Coke Company, 74
- Lucigen, 61
- Lumen-hour: defined, 215
- Lumens: 60, 94, 215
- Lutheran Church, 49
- Lyceum Theatre, London, 73
- Maeterlinck, Maurice, 9
- Magazines, 8
- Magdsick, H. H., 303
- Magnesia: 84;
- Nernst's application of, 138
- Magnesium, 179, 180
- Magnetite arc, 187
- Man: distinction between, and animal, 3;
- Manganese, 262, 268, 294
- Mangin, 188
- Mann, 129
- Mantles, 95
- Manufacturing, 8
- Marconi, 68
- Marks, 118
- Matches: as light-sources, 21; 22, 82
- Maxwell, 68
- Mazda lamps, 289, 339
- Mecca, 40
- Mediterranean Sea, 163
- Mercury-arc: Way's, 124; 125, 126;
- Middle Ages, 46, 47, 274
- Milton, quoted, 5
- Mirror, 19
- Mohammedans, 40
- Moore, Dr. McFarlan, 146, 147
- Morality, effect of light upon, 9
- Morse code: application of, to light-signaling, 198, 199
- Moses, 195
- Moving-pictures, 9, 260, 261
- Munich, 72
- Murdock, William: installment of gas-pipes by, 63; 68, 69, 70;
- Museums: 13;
- Music: light as an accompaniment to, 352-354
- Mythology, 16
- Nantes, 85
- Napoleon, 111
- Napthalene, 106
- National Heat and Light Co., 72, 74
- Natural gas, 99
- Navesink Light, 206
- Nernst, 138, 139
- Newspapers, 8
- Newton, Sir Isaac: 7;
- New York, 98, 165, 166, 206, 302, 304
- Niagara Falls, 108, 306
- Nickel, 262
- Nielson, 77
- Niepce, 258
- Niter, 21
- Nitrogen, 137
- Norfolk, 169
- Obesity, 275
- Offices, 13
- Oil: as a light-source, 29 et seq.;
- O'Leary, Mrs., and her lamp, 62
- Olive-oil, 51, 52, 167
- Orkney Islands, 29, 177
- Osmium, 133
- Oxygen: relative consumption of, by oil-lamps, 58, 59; 262
- Ozone, 262
- Painting, 342, 343, 347, 348, 349
- Pall Mall, 74
- Panama-Pacific Exposition: 304;
- Paper: 18;
- Paraffin, 35, 57
- Parker and Clark, 139
- Paris: experimental gas-lighting in, 83, 84;
- Peckham, John, 195
- Pennsylvania: discovery of oil in, 56
- Periodic Law, 145
- Petroleum: 35, 51, 55;
- Pharos, 163
- Philadelphia, 98, 99, 157
- Phillips and Lee, 70, 72
- "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London," 33;
- Phœnicians, 34, 39
- Phosphorus, 21
- Photo-micrography, 12
- Photography: 126;
- Picric acid, 106
- Pigments, 265
- Pintsch: production of, gas, 109, 110, 170
- Pitch, 106
- Plant-growth: artificial light and, 11, 249 et seq.
- Platinum, 85, 128, 129, 262
- Plumbago, 113, 130
- Plymouth, 166
- Poetry, 346
- Police, 162
- Potash, chlorate of, 22
- Priestley, Professor, quoted, 252
- Printing, 8
- Progress: influence of fire upon, 15 et seq.
- Prometheus, 16, 41
- Propylene, 106
- Ptolemy II, 163
- Radiators, energy, 88 et seq.
- Radium, 150
- Railway Signal Association, 205
- Railways: light-signaling applied to, 205
- Ramie fiber, 101
- Rane, 250, 251
- Rare-earth oxides: 85;
- Recreation, 9
- Redruth, 63
- Reformation: ceremonial uses of light during the, 48, 49
- Rheumatism, 275
- Robins, Benjamin, 201
- Rome, 30, 32, 34, 39, 41, 42, 44
- Röntgen, 270, 280.
- See also X-ray.
- Royal Society of London: 33, 63, 66, 67, 70, 73;
- Rumford, 167
- Rushlights, 28, 33
- Russia, 281
- Ryan, W. D'A., 306
- Safety: artificial light in relation to, 14, 225 et seq.
- Salts: chemical, 88, 89;
- Sandy Hook Light, 165, 166
- San Francisco, 304, 306-309
- Savages, 3, 15, 17
- Sawyer, 129
- Scheele, K. W., 133;
- Schools, 9
- Science: light and, 6, 7; 97;
- systematized, 268
- Scotland: 26, 31, 32, 48;
- oil industry in, 56
- Scott, Sir Walter, cited, 27, 98
- Sculpture: artificial light in relation to, 184
- Search-lights, 11, 169
- Section of Plant Protection, 225, 226
- Selenium, 267, 293
- Semaphore, 199
- Shells: illuminating, 179 et seq.
- Shirley, Thomas: quoted on natural gas, 66, 67
- Siemens, 78
- Signaling, 194-207
- Silicon: filament, 140
- Silk: artificial, 101;
- carbon-filaments, 129
- Simpson, R. E., 227, 231
- Silver, 258, 293
- Skin diseases: treatment of, 278, 279, 280
- Skylights, 13
- Sleep, 8
- Smallpox, 274, 275
- Smeaton, 166
- Soho, 69, 72
- South Africa, 129
- Sparks: 33, 125
- Spectrum: visible, 86;
- Sperm, 31, 51, 52, 167
- Spermaceti, 35, 51
- Splinter-holders, 27, 28
- Stage: and artificial light, 319 et seq.; 343
- Staite, 117, 118
- Stearine, 35, 52
- Stearn, 129
- Steel, 18, 33
- Steinmetz, Hayden and, 253
- Sterilization: quartz-mercury-arc and, 280, 281, 282
- Stevenson, Robert Louis, quoted, 177
- Stores, 13
- St. Paul, 43
- St. Paul's Cathedral, 300
- Street-lighting: development of, 152-162
- Sugar, 22
- Sulphide of iron, 18
- Sulphur, 18, 21, 179, 180, 294
- Sulphuric acid, 21, 22
- Sun, 8, 16, 19, 20
- Swan, 129
- Syracuse, 19
- Syria, 153
- Tallow, 34, 35, 51, 52
- Tantalum: 132;
- filament lamps, 133
- Tar, 68, 106
- Telegraphy, 195
- Telephony, 194
- Textiles, 256
- Thames, 169
- Theaters, 9, 319 et seq.
- Thoria, 85
- Tin, 262
- Tinder-boxes, 18, 19, 22
- Travelers Insurance Company, 227
- Trees, 26
- Troy, 42
- Tuberculosis, 273
- Tungsten lamp, 161 et seq., 187, 261, 290, 303
- Typhus, 273
- Ultra-violet rays: 126, 150;
- United States: petroleum in, 57;
- United States Geological Survey, cited on sale of gas, 222
- United States Military Intelligence, 225, 226
- Vacuum tubes, 81, 286
- Venetians, 195
- Ventilation, 13
- Verne, Jules, 143
- Vestal Virgins, 42
- Volcanoes, 166
- Volta, 111, 112, 127
- Voltaic pile: construction of, 111, 127
- Von Bolton. See Bolton.
- War: and artificial light, 11, 178-193
- Washington, 305
- Water: sterilization of, by artificial light, 280 et seq.
- Watson, Dr. Richard, 67, 68
- Watt, 94
- Waves: electro-magnetic, 68, 86, 125 et seq.
- Wax, 34, 46, 51
- Way: mercury-arc produced by, 124
- Wells, 61
- Wells, H. G., cited, 148
- Welsbach, Auer von: 61;
- Wenham, 78
- West Indies, 25
- Whale-oil, 31
- Wicks, 35, 36, 53, 54, 58, 59
- Winsor, 72, 73.
- See also Winzler.
- Winzler. See Winsor.
- Wolfram. See Tungsten.
- Wood, 26, 27, 28
- Woolworth Building, 302, 303
- Wounds: treatment of, by artificial light, 10
Location | Original | Correction | |
---|---|---|---|
Chapter/Section | Page | ||
Chapter II | 18 | and similiar material | and similar material |
Chapter XIII | 167 | as a constant level | at a constant level |
Chapter XIV | 186 | the carbons to distintegrate | the carbons to disintegrate |
Chapter XV | 195 | John Pechham | John Peckham |
coated with an allow | coated with an alloy | ||
196 | with various billiant | with various brilliant | |
200 | key in depressed | key is depressed | |
Chapter XVI | 216 | has nearly doubled | have nearly doubled |
Chapter XVII | 230 | this own indifference | their own indifference |
Chapter XXIII | 314 | Nature's lighting varied | Nature's lighting varies |
Chapter XXIV | 332 | so-called cadelabra | so-called candelabra |
337 | possibilties | possibilities | |
READING REFERENCES | 358 | ...Applications an Théatre." | ...Applications au Théatre." |
INDEX | 364 | Photo-micography | Photo-micrography |
365 | Siemans | Siemens |
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!