This is a modern-English version of The History of Mary Prince, a West Indian Slave, originally written by Prince, Mary.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
THE
HISTORY OF MARY PRINCE,
A WEST INDIAN SLAVE.
RELATED BY HERSELF.
WITH A SUPPLEMENT BY THE EDITOR.
To which is added,
THE NARRATIVE OF ASA-ASA,
A CAPTURED AFRICAN.
Cowper.
Cowper.
LONDON:
PUBLISHED BY F. WESTLEY AND A. H. DAVIS,
Stationers' Hall Court;
And by WAUGH & INNES, EDINBURGH.
1831.
PREFACE.
The idea of writing Mary Prince's history was first suggested by herself. She wished it to be done, she said, that good people in England might hear from a slave what a slave had felt and suffered; and a letter of her late master's, which will be found in the Supplement, induced me to accede to her wish without farther delay. The more immediate object of the publication will afterwards appear.
The idea of writing Mary Prince's story was initially proposed by her. She wanted it done so that compassionate people in England could hear from a slave about what a slave had experienced and endured; and a letter from her former master, which you’ll find in the Supplement, prompted me to agree to her request without further delay. The more immediate purpose of this publication will become clear later.
The narrative was taken down from Mary's own lips by a lady who happened to be at the time residing in my family as a visitor. It was written out fully, with all the narrator's repetitions and prolixities, and afterwards pruned into its present shape; retaining, as far as was practicable, Mary's exact expressions and peculiar phraseology. No fact of importance has been omitted, and not a single circumstance or sentiment has been added. It is essentially her own, without any material alteration farther than was requisite to exclude redundancies and gross grammatical errors, so as to render it clearly intelligible.
The story was recorded from Mary’s own words by a woman who was staying with my family as a guest at the time. It was initially written out in full, including all of the narrator's repetitions and lengthy explanations, and later refined into its current form; keeping, as much as possible, Mary’s exact expressions and unique way of speaking. No important facts have been left out, and not a single detail or feeling has been added. It is essentially her own story, with no significant changes beyond what was necessary to remove excess wording and major grammatical mistakes, making it clearly understandable.
After it had been thus written out, I went over the whole, carefully examining her on every fact and circumstance detailed; and in all that relates to her residence in Antigua I had the advantage of being assisted in this scrutiny by Mr. Joseph Phillips, who was a resident in that colony during the same period, and had known her there.
After it was written out, I reviewed everything, carefully questioning her on every detail and fact mentioned. In everything related to her time in Antigua, I had the benefit of being guided in this examination by Mr. Joseph Phillips, who lived in that colony during the same time and knew her there.
The names of all the persons mentioned by the narrator have been printed in full, except those of Capt. I—— and his wife, and that of Mr. D——, to whom conduct of peculiar atrocity is ascribed. These three individuals are now gone to answer at a far more awful tribunal than that of public opinion, for the deeds of which their former bondwoman accuses them; and [iv]to hold them up more openly to human reprobation could no longer affect themselves, while it might deeply lacerate the feelings of their surviving and perhaps innocent relatives, without any commensurate public advantage.
The names of all the people mentioned by the narrator have been printed in full, except for Capt. I—— and his wife, and Mr. D——, who is accused of particularly terrible actions. These three individuals are now facing a far more serious judgment than that of public opinion, for the deeds their former bondwoman blames them for; and [iv]bringing them into the light for human condemnation would no longer impact them, while it could deeply hurt the feelings of their surviving and possibly innocent relatives, without any real benefit to the public.
Without detaining the reader with remarks on other points which will be adverted to more conveniently in the Supplement, I shall here merely notice farther, that the Anti-Slavery Society have no concern whatever with this publication, nor are they in any degree responsible for the statements it contains. I have published the tract, not as their Secretary, but in my private capacity; and any profits that may arise from the sale will be exclusively appropriated to the benefit of Mary Prince herself.
Without keeping the reader with comments on other points that will be addressed more conveniently in the Supplement, I want to note further that the Anti-Slavery Society has no connection to this publication, nor are they in any way responsible for the statements it includes. I have published this tract, not as their Secretary, but in my personal capacity; and any profits that come from the sale will be entirely allocated to the benefit of Mary Prince herself.
THO. PRINGLE.
THO. PRINGLE.
7, Solly Terrace, Claremont Square,
7 Solly Terrace, Claremont Square
January 25, 1831.
January 25, 1831.
P. S. Since writing the above, I have been furnished by my friend Mr. George Stephen, with the interesting narrative of Asa-Asa, a captured African, now under his protection; and have printed it as a suitable appendix to this little history.
P. S. Since I wrote the above, my friend Mr. George Stephen has shared the fascinating story of Asa-Asa, a captured African who is now under his care, and I have included it as a fitting appendix to this little history.
T. P.
Toilet paper
THE HISTORY OF MARY PRINCE, A WEST INDIAN SLAVE.
(Related by herself.)
I was born at Brackish-Pond, in Bermuda, on a farm belonging to Mr. Charles Myners. My mother was a household slave; and my father, whose name was Prince, was a sawyer belonging to Mr. Trimmingham, a ship-builder at Crow-Lane. When I was an infant, old Mr. Myners died, and there was a division of the slaves and other property among the family. I was bought along with my mother by old Captain Darrel, and given to his grandchild, little Miss Betsey Williams. Captain Williams, Mr. Darrel's son-in-law, was master of a vessel which traded to several places in America and the West Indies, and he was seldom at home long together.
I was born at Brackish-Pond in Bermuda, on a farm owned by Mr. Charles Myners. My mother was a household slave, and my father, named Prince, was a sawyer who worked for Mr. Trimmingham, a shipbuilder at Crow-Lane. When I was a baby, old Mr. Myners passed away, and the slaves and other property were divided among the family. My mother and I were bought by old Captain Darrel and given to his granddaughter, little Miss Betsey Williams. Captain Williams, Mr. Darrel's son-in-law, was the captain of a ship that traded to various places in America and the West Indies, and he wasn't home for long periods.
Mrs. Williams was a kind-hearted good woman, and she treated all her slaves well. She had only one daughter, Miss Betsey, for whom I was purchased, and who was about my own age. I was made quite a pet of by Miss Betsey, and loved her very much. She used to lead me about by the hand, and call me her little nigger. This was the happiest period of my life; for I was too young to understand rightly my condition as a slave, and too thoughtless and full of spirits to look forward to the days of toil and sorrow.
Mrs. Williams was a kind-hearted woman who treated all her slaves well. She had only one daughter, Miss Betsey, for whom I was bought, and who was about my age. Miss Betsey spoiled me a lot, and I loved her very much. She would take my hand and call me her little black. This was the happiest time of my life; I was too young to fully grasp my situation as a slave and too carefree and lively to think about the hard work and sadness that lay ahead.
My mother was a household slave in the same family. I was under her own care, and my little brothers and sisters were my play-fellows and companions. My mother had several fine children after she came to Mrs. Williams,—three girls and two boys. The tasks given out to us children were light, and we used to play together with Miss Betsey, with as much freedom almost as if she had been our sister.
My mom was a household servant for the same family. She took care of me, and my little brothers and sisters were my playmates and companions. After she started working for Mrs. Williams, my mom had several great kids—three girls and two boys. The chores we were assigned were easy, and we used to play with Miss Betsey almost as freely as if she were our sister.
My master, however, was a very harsh, selfish man; and we always dreaded his return from sea. His wife was herself much afraid of him; and, during his stay at home, seldom dared to shew her usual kindness to the slaves. He often left her, in the most distressed circumstances, to reside in other female society, at some place in the West Indies of which I have forgot the name. My poor mistress bore his ill-treatment with great patience, and all her slaves loved and pitied her. I was truly attached to her, and, next to my own mother, loved her better than any creature in the world. My obedience to her commands was cheerfully[2] given: it sprung solely from the affection I felt for her, and not from fear of the power which the white people's law had given her over me.
My master, however, was a very cruel and selfish man, and we always dreaded his return from the sea. His wife was also scared of him, and while he was at home, she rarely showed her usual kindness to the slaves. He often left her in difficult situations to spend time with other women somewhere in the West Indies, a place I can't remember the name of. My poor mistress endured his mistreatment with a lot of patience, and all her slaves loved and sympathized with her. I was really attached to her and, next to my own mother, loved her more than anyone else in the world. I happily obeyed her commands, and my obedience came purely from the affection I felt for her, not from fear of the authority the law allowed her to have over me.[2]
I had scarcely reached my twelfth year when my mistress became too poor to keep so many of us at home; and she hired me out to Mrs. Pruden, a lady who lived about five miles off, in the adjoining parish, in a large house near the sea. I cried bitterly at parting with my dear mistress and Miss Betsey, and when I kissed my mother and brothers and sisters, I thought my young heart would break, it pained me so. But there was no help; I was forced to go. Good Mrs. Williams comforted me by saying that I should still be near the home I was about to quit, and might come over and see her and my kindred whenever I could obtain leave of absence from Mrs. Pruden. A few hours after this I was taken to a strange house, and found myself among strange people. This separation seemed a sore trial to me then; but oh! 'twas light, light to the trials I have since endured!—'twas nothing—nothing to be mentioned with them; but I was a child then, and it was according to my strength.
I had barely turned twelve when my mistress could no longer afford to keep all of us at home, so she hired me out to Mrs. Pruden, a lady who lived about five miles away in the neighboring parish, in a big house near the sea. I cried hard when I had to say goodbye to my dear mistress and Miss Betsey, and when I kissed my mother and brothers and sisters, I felt like my young heart would break from the pain. But there was no choice; I had to go. Good Mrs. Williams comforted me by saying that I would still be close to the home I was leaving and could visit her and my family whenever I got permission from Mrs. Pruden. A few hours later, I was taken to a strange house and found myself among unfamiliar people. This separation felt like a huge trial for me at the time; but oh! It was nothing—nothing compared to the challenges I’ve faced since then; it was insignificant—insignificant when put next to them; but I was just a child then, and it was in line with my strength.
I knew that Mrs. Williams could no longer maintain me; that she was fain to part with me for my food and clothing; and I tried to submit myself to the change. My new mistress was a passionate woman; but yet she did not treat me very unkindly. I do not remember her striking me but once, and that was for going to see Mrs. Williams when I heard she was sick, and staying longer than she had given me leave to do. All my employment at this time was nursing a sweet baby, little Master Daniel; and I grew so fond of my nursling that it was my greatest delight to walk out with him by the sea-shore, accompanied by his brother and sister, Miss Fanny and Master James.—Dear Miss Fanny! She was a sweet, kind young lady, and so fond of me that she wished me to learn all that she knew herself; and her method of teaching me was as follows:—Directly she had said her lessons to her grandmamma, she used to come running to me, and make me repeat them one by one after her; and in a few months I was able not only to say my letters but to spell many small words. But this happy state was not to last long. Those days were too pleasant to last. My heart always softens when I think of them.
I knew that Mrs. Williams could no longer take care of me; she was forced to let me go for my food and clothing, and I tried to adjust to the change. My new mistress was a passionate woman; however, she didn't treat me very unkindly. I only remember her hitting me once, and that was for visiting Mrs. Williams when I heard she was sick and staying longer than I was allowed. During this time, my main job was taking care of a sweet baby, little Master Daniel; I grew so attached to him that my greatest joy was taking walks with him by the sea-shore, along with his brother and sister, Miss Fanny and Master James.—Dear Miss Fanny! She was a lovely, kind young lady, and she cared for me so much that she wanted me to learn everything she knew. Her way of teaching me was this: as soon as she finished her lessons with her grandmother, she would run to me and have me repeat them one by one after her; in a few months, I was able not only to say my letters but to spell many small words. But this happy time didn’t last long. Those days were too wonderful to endure. My heart always warms when I think back on them.
At this time Mrs. Williams died. I was told suddenly of her death, and my grief was so great that, forgetting I had the baby in my arms, I ran away directly to my poor mistress's house; but reached it only in time to see the corpse carried out. Oh, that was a day of sorrow,—a heavy day! All the slaves cried. My mother cried and lamented her sore; and I (foolish creature!) vainly entreated them to bring my dear mistress back to life. I knew nothing rightly about death then, and it seemed a hard thing to bear. When I thought about my mistress I felt as if the world was all gone wrong; and for many days and weeks I could think of nothing else. I returned to Mrs. Pruden's; but my sorrow was too great to be comforted, for my own dear mistress was always in my mind. Whether in the house or abroad, my thoughts were always talking to me about her.
At that time, Mrs. Williams passed away. I was suddenly informed of her death, and I was so overwhelmed with grief that I forgot I was holding the baby and ran straight to my poor mistress's house, but I only got there in time to see the body being taken away. Oh, that was such a sorrowful day—a heavy day! All the slaves were crying. My mother wept and mourned her loss, and I (what a foolish thing to do!) desperately begged them to bring my dear mistress back to life. I didn’t really understand death then, and it felt like an unbearable burden. Whenever I thought about my mistress, it seemed like everything in the world had gone wrong, and for many days and weeks, it was all I could think about. I returned to Mrs. Pruden's, but my sadness was too great to find any comfort, as my beloved mistress was always on my mind. Whether I was inside or outside, my thoughts were constantly talking to me about her.
I staid at Mrs. Pruden's about three months after this; I was[3] then sent back to Mr. Williams to be sold. Oh, that was a sad sad time! I recollect the day well. Mrs. Pruden came to me and said, "Mary, you will have to go home directly; your master is going to be married, and he means to sell you and two of your sisters to raise money for the wedding." Hearing this I burst out a crying,—though I was then far from being sensible of the full weight of my misfortune, or of the misery that waited for me. Besides, I did not like to leave Mrs. Pruden, and the dear baby, who had grown very fond of me. For some time I could scarcely believe that Mrs. Pruden was in earnest, till I received orders for my immediate return.—Dear Miss Fanny! how she cried at parting with me, whilst I kissed and hugged the baby, thinking I should never see him again. I left Mrs. Pruden's, and walked home with a heart full of sorrow. The idea of being sold away from my mother and Miss Betsey was so frightful, that I dared not trust myself to think about it. We had been bought of Mr. Myners, as I have mentioned, by Miss Betsey's grandfather, and given to her, so that we were by right her property, and I never thought we should be separated or sold away from her.
I stayed at Mrs. Pruden's for about three months after this; I was[3] then sent back to Mr. Williams to be sold. Oh, that was such a sad time! I remember that day clearly. Mrs. Pruden came to me and said, "Mary, you need to go home right away; your master is getting married, and he plans to sell you and two of your sisters to raise money for the wedding." Hearing this made me burst into tears,—even though I wasn't fully aware of the full weight of my misfortune or the misery that awaited me. Besides, I didn’t want to leave Mrs. Pruden and the sweet baby, who had become very attached to me. For a while, I could hardly believe Mrs. Pruden was serious until I got orders for my immediate return.—Dear Miss Fanny! how much she cried when we parted, while I kissed and hugged the baby, thinking I would never see him again. I left Mrs. Pruden's and walked home with a heart full of sorrow. The thought of being sold away from my mother and Miss Betsey was so terrifying that I couldn't allow myself to think about it. We had been purchased from Mr. Myners, as I mentioned, by Miss Betsey's grandfather, and given to her, so by rights we were her property, and I never imagined we would be separated or sold away from her.
When I reached the house, I went in directly to Miss Betsey. I found her in great distress; and she cried out as soon as she saw me, "Oh, Mary! my father is going to sell you all to raise money to marry that wicked woman. You are my slaves, and he has no right to sell you; but it is all to please her." She then told me that my mother was living with her father's sister at a house close by, and I went there to see her. It was a sorrowful meeting; and we lamented with a great and sore crying our unfortunate situation. "Here comes one of my poor picaninnies!" she said, the moment I came in, "one of the poor slave-brood who are to be sold to-morrow."
When I got to the house, I went straight to Miss Betsey. She was really upset, and as soon as she saw me, she exclaimed, "Oh, Mary! My dad is going to sell all of you to raise money to marry that awful woman. You are my slaves, and he has no right to sell you; but he's doing it all to make her happy." She then told me that my mom was living with her dad's sister at a house nearby, and I went there to see her. It was a sad reunion, and we both cried a lot over our unfortunate situation. "Here comes one of my poor little ones!" she said as soon as I walked in, "one of the poor slaves who are going to be sold tomorrow."
Oh dear! I cannot bear to think of that day,—it is too much.—It recalls the great grief that filled my heart, and the woeful thoughts that passed to and fro through my mind, whilst listening to the pitiful words of my poor mother, weeping for the loss of her children. I wish I could find words to tell you all I then felt and suffered. The great God above alone knows the thoughts of the poor slave's heart, and the bitter pains which follow such separations as these. All that we love taken away from us—Oh, it is sad, sad! and sore to be borne!—I got no sleep that night for thinking of the morrow; and dear Miss Betsey was scarcely less distressed. She could not bear to part with her old playmates, and she cried sore and would not be pacified.
Oh no! I can’t stand to think about that day—it’s just too much. It brings back the immense sadness that filled my heart and the sorrowful thoughts that kept swirling around in my mind while I listened to my poor mother’s heartbreaking words as she cried for the loss of her children. I wish I could find the right words to express everything I felt and went through then. Only the great God above knows the thoughts in a poor slave's heart and the deep pain that comes from separations like these. Everything we love taken away from us—oh, it’s so heartbreaking and hard to bear! I couldn’t sleep that night thinking about what was coming, and dear Miss Betsey was nearly as upset. She couldn’t stand to say goodbye to her old friends, and she cried hard and wouldn’t be comforted.
The black morning at length came; it came too soon for my poor mother and us. Whilst she was putting on us the new osnaburgs in which we were to be sold, she said, in a sorrowful voice, (I shall never forget it!) "See, I am shrouding my poor children; what a task for a mother!"—She then called Miss Betsey to take leave of us. "I am going to carry my little chickens to market," (these were her very words,) "take your last look of them; may be you will see them no more." "Oh, my poor slaves! my own slaves!" said dear Miss Betsey, "you belong to me; and it grieves my heart to part with you."—Miss Betsey kissed us all, and, when she left us, my mother called the rest of the slaves to bid us good bye. One of them, a woman named Moll,[4] came with her infant in her arms. "Ay!" said my mother, seeing her turn away and look at her child with the tears in her eyes, "your turn will come next." The slaves could say nothing to comfort us; they could only weep and lament with us. When I left my dear little brothers and the house in which I had been brought up, I thought my heart would burst.
The dark morning finally arrived; it came way too soon for my poor mother and us. While she dressed us in the new osnaburgs we were to be sold in, she said in a sad voice, (I’ll never forget it!) "See, I am shrouding my poor children; what a task for a mother!"—She then called Miss Betsey to say goodbye to us. "I’m going to take my little chickens to market," (these were her exact words,) "take a last look at them; you might not see them again." "Oh, my poor slaves! my own slaves!" said dear Miss Betsey, "you belong to me; it breaks my heart to part with you."—Miss Betsey kissed us all, and when she left, my mother called the other slaves to say goodbye. One of them, a woman named Moll,[4] came with her baby in her arms. "Ay!" said my mother, seeing her turn away and look at her child with tears in her eyes, "your turn will come next." The slaves had no words to comfort us; they could only weep and mourn alongside us. When I left my dear little brothers and the house where I had grown up, I felt like my heart would break.
Our mother, weeping as she went, called me away with the children Hannah and Dinah, and we took the road that led to Hamble Town, which we reached about four o'clock in the afternoon. We followed my mother to the market-place, where she placed us in a row against a large house, with our backs to the wall and our arms folded across our breasts. I, as the eldest, stood first, Hannah next to me, then Dinah; and our mother stood beside, crying over us. My heart throbbed with grief and terror so violently, that I pressed my hands quite tightly across my breast, but I could not keep it still, and it continued to leap as though it would burst out of my body. But who cared for that? Did one of the many by-standers, who were looking at us so carelessly, think of the pain that wrung the hearts of the negro woman and her young ones? No, no! They were not all bad, I dare say; but slavery hardens white people's hearts towards the blacks; and many of them were not slow to make their remarks upon us aloud, without regard to our grief—though their light words fell like cayenne on the fresh wounds of our hearts. Oh those white people have small hearts who can only feel for themselves.
Our mother, crying as she walked, called me to come with the kids, Hannah and Dinah, and we took the road to Hamble Town, arriving around four in the afternoon. We followed her to the marketplace, where she lined us up against a big house, our backs to the wall and our arms folded across our chests. I, being the eldest, stood first, with Hannah next to me and then Dinah; our mother stood beside us, crying over us. My heart raced with grief and fear so intensely that I pressed my hands tightly against my chest, but I couldn't keep it still; it continued to pound as if it would burst out of my body. But who cared about that? Did any of the bystanders, who were watching us so indifferently, think about the pain that twisted the hearts of the Black woman and her children? No, no! They weren’t all bad, I assume; but slavery hardens white people's hearts towards Black people, and many of them didn’t hesitate to openly comment on us, ignoring our sorrow—though their casual words felt like cayenne pepper on the fresh wounds of our hearts. Oh, those white people have small hearts who can only feel for themselves.
At length the vendue master, who was to offer us for sale like sheep or cattle, arrived, and asked my mother which was the eldest. She said nothing, but pointed to me. He took me by the hand, and led me out into the middle of the street, and, turning me slowly round, exposed me to the view of those who attended the vendue. I was soon surrounded by strange men, who examined and handled me in the same manner that a butcher would a calf or a lamb he was about to purchase, and who talked about my shape and size in like words—as if I could no more understand their meaning than the dumb beasts. I was then put up to sale. The bidding commenced at a few pounds, and gradually rose to fifty-seven,[1] when I was knocked down to the highest bidder; and the people who stood by said that I had fetched a great sum for so young a slave.
At last, the auctioneer, who was supposed to sell us like livestock, showed up and asked my mother who was the oldest. She didn't say anything but pointed to me. He took my hand and led me out into the middle of the street, and, turning me around slowly, exposed me to the crowd at the auction. I was soon surrounded by strange men who inspected and grabbed me just like a butcher would a calf or lamb he was about to buy, discussing my shape and size in a way that made it clear I understood as much as the dumb animals. I was then put up for sale. The bidding started at a few pounds and gradually climbed to fifty-seven,[1] when I was sold to the highest bidder; the people watching remarked that I had fetched a high price for such a young slave.
I then saw my sisters led forth, and sold to different owners; so that we had not the sad satisfaction of being partners in bondage. When the sale was over, my mother hugged and kissed us, and mourned over us, begging of us to keep up a good heart, and do our duty to our new masters. It was a sad parting; one went one way, one another, and our poor mammy went home with nothing.[2]
I then saw my sisters being taken away and sold to different owners, so we weren't even able to share the sadness of being in bondage together. Once the sale was done, my mother hugged and kissed us, crying over us and asking us to stay strong and do our best for our new masters. It was a heartbreaking goodbye; one sister went one way, another went a different way, and our poor mom went home with nothing. [2]
My new master was a Captain I——, who lived at Spanish Point. After parting with my mother and sisters, I followed him to his store, and he gave me into the charge of his son, a lad about my own age, Master Benjy, who took me to my new home. I did not know where I was going, or what my new master would do with me. My heart was quite broken with grief, and my thoughts went back continually to those from whom I had been so suddenly parted. "Oh, my mother! my mother!" I kept saying to myself, "Oh, my mammy and my sisters and my brothers, shall I never see you again!"
My new master was Captain I——, who lived at Spanish Point. After saying goodbye to my mom and sisters, I followed him to his store, and he handed me over to his son, a boy about my age, Master Benjy, who took me to my new home. I had no idea where I was going or what my new master would do with me. My heart was completely broken with grief, and my thoughts constantly went back to those I had been abruptly separated from. "Oh, my mother! my mother!" I kept repeating to myself, "Oh, my mammy and my sisters and my brothers, will I ever see you again!"
Oh, the trials! the trials! they make the salt water come into my eyes when I think of the days in which I was afflicted—the times that are gone; when I mourned and grieved with a young heart for those whom I loved.
Oh, the struggles! The struggles! They bring tears to my eyes when I think of the days I suffered—the times that are past; when I mourned and grieved with a young heart for those I loved.
It was night when I reached my new home. The house was large, and built at the bottom of a very high hill; but I could not see much of it that night. I saw too much of it afterwards. The stones and the timber were the best things in it; they were not so hard as the hearts of the owners.[3]
It was night when I arrived at my new home. The house was big and located at the bottom of a very tall hill; but I couldn't see much of it that night. I saw too much of it later. The stone and wood were the best parts of it; they weren't as cold as the hearts of the owners.[3]
Before I entered the house, two slave women, hired from another owner, who were at work in the yard, spoke to me, and asked who I belonged to? I replied, "I am come to live here." "Poor child, poor child!" they both said; "you must keep a good heart, if you are to live here."—When I went in, I stood up crying in a corner. Mrs. I—— came and took off my hat, a little black silk hat Miss Pruden made for me, and said in a rough voice, "You are not come here to stand up in corners and cry, you are come here to work." She then put a child into my arms, and, tired as I was, I was forced instantly to take up my old occupation of a nurse.—I could not bear to look at my mistress, her countenance was so stern. She was a stout tall woman with a very dark complexion, and her brows were always drawn together into a frown. I thought of the words of the two slave women when I saw Mrs. I——, and heard the harsh sound of her voice.
Before I entered the house, two enslaved women, hired from another owner, who were working in the yard, spoke to me and asked who I belonged to. I replied, "I'm here to live." "Poor child, poor child!" they both said; "you need to keep your spirits up if you’re going to live here." When I went inside, I stood crying in a corner. Mrs. I—— came over, took off my hat—a little black silk hat Miss Pruden made for me—and said in a harsh voice, "You didn’t come here to stand in corners and cry; you came here to work." She then handed a child to me, and, as tired as I was, I had to immediately resume my old role as a nurse. I couldn’t stand to look at my mistress; her expression was so severe. She was a stout, tall woman with a very dark complexion, and her brows were always furrowed in a frown. I thought of the words of the two enslaved women when I saw Mrs. I—— and heard the harsh sound of her voice.
The person I took the most notice of that night was a French Black called Hetty, whom my master took in privateering from another vessel, and made his slave. She was the most active woman I ever saw, and she was tasked to her utmost. A few minutes after my arrival she came in from milking the cows, and put the sweet-potatoes on for supper. She then fetched home the sheep, and penned them in the fold; drove home the cattle, and staked them about the pond side;[4] fed and rubbed down my master's horse, and gave the hog and the fed cow[5] their suppers; prepared the beds, and undressed the children, and laid them to sleep. I liked to look at her and watch all her doings, for hers was the only friendly face I had as yet seen, and I felt glad that she was there. She gave me my supper of potatoes and milk, and a blanket to sleep upon, which she spread for me in the passage before the door of Mrs. I——'s chamber.
The person I noticed the most that night was a Black French woman named Hetty, whom my master brought in from another ship during his privateering and made her his slave. She was the most hardworking woman I had ever seen, completely occupied with tasks. A few minutes after I arrived, she came in from milking the cows and started cooking sweet potatoes for dinner. Then, she brought home the sheep and penned them up; drove in the cattle and tied them by the pond; fed and brushed my master's horse, and gave the hog and the cow their dinner; made the beds, took the children out of their clothes, and put them to sleep. I enjoyed watching her and everything she did because she was the only friendly face I had seen so far, and I was glad she was there. She gave me my dinner of potatoes and milk, along with a blanket to sleep on, which she spread out for me in the hallway in front of Mrs. I——'s room.
I got a sad fright, that night. I was just going to sleep, when I heard a noise in my mistress's room; and she presently called out to inquire if some work was finished that she had ordered Hetty to do. "No, Ma'am, not yet," was Hetty's answer from below. On hearing this, my master started up from his bed, and just as he was, in his shirt, ran down stairs with a long cow-skin[6] in his hand. I heard immediately after, the cracking of the thong, and the house rang to the shrieks of poor Hetty, who kept crying out, "Oh, Massa! Massa! me dead. Massa! have mercy upon me—don't kill me outright."—This was a sad beginning for me. I sat up upon my blanket, trembling with terror, like a frightened hound, and thinking that my turn would come next. At length the house became still, and I forgot for a little while all my sorrows by falling fast asleep.
I got a scary shock that night. I was just about to sleep when I heard a noise in my mistress's room, and she called out to ask if some work she had asked Hetty to do was finished. "No, Ma'am, not yet," Hetty replied from downstairs. At this, my master jumped out of bed and, still in his shirt, ran downstairs with a long cowhide strap in his hand. I then heard the crack of the whip, and the house echoed with Hetty's screams as she kept crying out, "Oh, Master! Master! I'm going to die. Master! Have mercy on me—don’t kill me for real." This was a terrible start for me. I sat up on my blanket, shaking with fear like a scared dog, thinking that I would be next. Eventually, the house went quiet, and I forgot all my troubles for a little while and fell fast asleep.
The next morning my mistress set about instructing me in my tasks. She taught me to do all sorts of household work; to wash and bake, pick cotton and wool, and wash floors, and cook. And she taught me (how can I ever forget it!) more things than these; she caused me to know the exact difference between the smart of the rope, the cart-whip, and the cow-skin, when applied to my naked body by her own cruel hand. And there was scarcely any punishment more dreadful than the blows I received on my face and head from her hard heavy fist. She was a fearful woman, and a savage mistress to her slaves.
The next morning, my mistress started teaching me my duties. She showed me how to do all kinds of household chores: washing and baking, picking cotton and wool, mopping floors, and cooking. And she taught me (how could I ever forget!) even more than that; she made sure I understood the exact difference between the sting of the rope, the cart whip, and the cowhide when they struck my bare skin from her own cruel hand. There was hardly any punishment worse than the hits I took to my face and head from her heavy, hard fist. She was a terrifying woman and a brutal mistress to her slaves.
There were two little slave boys in the house, on whom she vented her bad temper in a special manner. One of these children was a mulatto, called Cyrus, who had been bought while an infant in his mother's arms; the other, Jack, was an African from the coast of Guinea, whom a sailor had given or sold to my master. Seldom a day passed without these boys receiving the most severe treatment, and often for no fault at all. Both my master and mistress seemed to think that they had a right to ill-use them at their pleasure; and very often accompanied their commands with blows, whether the children were behaving well or ill. I have seen their flesh ragged and raw with licks.—Lick—lick—they were never secure one moment from a blow, and their lives were passed in continual fear. My mistress was not contented with using the whip, but often pinched their cheeks and arms in the most cruel manner. My pity for these poor boys was soon transferred to myself; for I was licked, and flogged, and pinched by her pitiless fingers in the neck and arms, exactly as they were. To strip me naked—to hang me up by the wrists and lay my flesh open with the cow-skin, was an ordinary punishment for even a slight offence. My mistress often robbed me too of the hours that belong to sleep. She used to sit up very late, frequently even until morning; and I had then to stand at a bench and wash during the greater part of the night, or pick wool and cotton; and often I have dropped down overcome by sleep and fatigue, till roused from a state of stupor by the whip, and forced to start up to my tasks.
There were two little slave boys in the house who were the target of her bad temper in a particular way. One of these boys was a mulatto named Cyrus, who had been bought as an infant in his mother’s arms; the other, Jack, was African from the coast of Guinea, whom a sailor had given or sold to my master. Rarely did a day go by without these boys facing the harshest treatment, often for no reason at all. Both my master and mistress seemed to believe they had the right to mistreat them whenever they wanted, frequently backing their commands with blows, regardless of whether the children were behaving or not. I’ve seen their skin raw and torn from beatings. Lick—lick—they were never safe from a blow, and their lives were filled with constant fear. My mistress didn’t just use the whip; she often pinched their cheeks and arms in the most cruel way. My pity for these poor boys quickly turned to concern for myself because I was beaten, whipped, and pinched by her merciless fingers on my neck and arms, just like they were. Being stripped naked, hung by my wrists, and having my skin cut open with the cow-skin was a common punishment for even a minor mistake. My mistress often deprived me of sleep, staying up very late, sometimes even until morning; I had to stand at a bench and wash most of the night or pick wool and cotton. Often, I would collapse from sleep and exhaustion until I was jolted awake by the whip and forced to jump up and get back to work.
Poor Hetty, my fellow slave, was very kind to me, and I used to call her my Aunt; but she led a most miserable life, and her death was hastened (at least the slaves all believed and said so,) by the dreadful chastisement she received from my master during her pregnancy. It happened as follows. One of the cows had dragged the rope away from the stake to which Hetty had fastened it, and got loose. My master flew into a terrible passion, and ordered the poor creature to be stripped quite naked, notwithstanding her pregnancy, and to be tied up to a tree in the yard. He then flogged her as hard as he could lick, both with the whip and cow-skin, till she was all over streaming with blood. He rested, and then beat her again and again. Her shrieks were terrible. The consequence was that poor Hetty was brought to bed before her time, and was delivered after severe labour of a dead child. She appeared to recover after her confinement, so far that she was repeatedly flogged by both master and mistress afterwards; but her former strength never returned to her. Ere long her body and limbs swelled to a great size; and she lay on a mat in the kitchen, till the water burst out of her body and she died. All the slaves said that death was a good thing for poor Hetty; but I cried very much for her death. The manner of it filled me with horror. I could not bear to think about it; yet it was always present to my mind for many a day.
Poor Hetty, my fellow slave, was very kind to me, and I used to call her my Aunt; but she lived a really miserable life, and the slaves all believed that her death was hastened by the terrible punishment my master inflicted on her during her pregnancy. Here’s what happened. One of the cows broke free from the rope Hetty had secured it with. My master flew into a rage and ordered Hetty to be stripped completely naked, even though she was pregnant, and tied to a tree in the yard. He then whipped her as hard as he could with both a whip and a cowhide until she was covered in blood. He took breaks but continued to beat her over and over. Her screams were horrifying. As a result, poor Hetty went into labor prematurely and gave birth to a dead child after a painful delivery. She seemed to recover somewhat after giving birth, but she was flogged repeatedly by both my master and mistress afterwards; however, her strength never returned. Soon enough, her body and limbs swelled up significantly, and she lay on a mat in the kitchen until the fluid burst from her body, and she died. All the slaves said that death was a relief for poor Hetty, but I cried a lot for her death. The way she died filled me with horror. I couldn't bear to think about it; yet it stayed in my mind for many days.
After Hetty died all her labours fell upon me, in addition to my own. I had now to milk eleven cows every morning before sunrise, sitting among the damp weeds; to take care of the cattle as well as the children; and to do the work of the house. There was no end to my toils—no end to my blows. I lay down at night and rose up in the morning in fear and sorrow; and often wished that like poor Hetty I could escape from this cruel bondage and be at rest in the grave. But the hand of that God whom then I knew not, was stretched over me; and I was mercifully preserved for better things. It was then, however, my heavy lot to weep, weep, weep, and that for years; to pass from one[8] misery to another, and from one cruel master to a worse. But I must go on with the thread of my story.
After Hetty died, all her responsibilities fell on me, in addition to my own. I now had to milk eleven cows every morning before sunrise, sitting among the damp weeds; to take care of the cattle as well as the kids; and to handle the household chores. There seemed to be no end to my struggles—no end to my hardships. I lay down at night and got up in the morning filled with fear and sadness; and often wished that, like poor Hetty, I could escape from this harsh existence and find peace in the grave. But the hand of that God whom I didn’t know at the time was stretched over me; and I was mercifully preserved for better things. It was then my heavy fate to cry, cry, cry, for years; to move from one misery to another, and from one cruel master to a worse one. But I must continue with the thread of my story.
One day a heavy squall of wind and rain came on suddenly, and my mistress sent me round the corner of the house to empty a large earthen jar. The jar was already cracked with an old deep crack that divided it in the middle, and in turning it upside down to empty it, it parted in my hand. I could not help the accident, but I was dreadfully frightened, looking forward to a severe punishment. I ran crying to my mistress, "O mistress, the jar has come in two." "You have broken it, have you?" she replied; "come directly here to me." I came trembling; she stripped and flogged me long and severely with the cow-skin; as long as she had strength to use the lash, for she did not give over till she was quite tired.—When my master came home at night, she told him of my fault; and oh, frightful! how he fell a swearing. After abusing me with every ill name he could think of, (too, too bad to speak in England,) and giving me several heavy blows with his hand, he said, "I shall come home to-morrow morning at twelve, on purpose to give you a round hundred." He kept his word—Oh sad for me! I cannot easily forget it. He tied me up upon a ladder, and gave me a hundred lashes with his own hand, and master Benjy stood by to count them for him. When he had licked me for some time he sat down to take breath; then after resting, he beat me again and again, until he was quite wearied, and so hot (for the weather was very sultry), that he sank back in his chair, almost like to faint. While my mistress went to bring him drink, there was a dreadful earthquake. Part of the roof fell down, and every thing in the house went—clatter, clatter, clatter. Oh I thought the end of all things near at hand; and I was so sore with the flogging, that I scarcely cared whether I lived or died. The earth was groaning and shaking; every thing tumbling about; and my mistress and the slaves were shrieking and crying out, "The earthquake! the earthquake!" It was an awful day for us all.
One day, a heavy wind and rainstorm suddenly hit, and my mistress sent me around to the corner of the house to empty a large earthen jar. The jar was already cracked in the middle, and when I turned it upside down to empty it, it broke apart in my hands. I couldn't prevent the accident, but I was terrified, fearing a harsh punishment. I ran to my mistress in tears, "Oh mistress, the jar has broken in two." "You broke it, did you?" she replied; "come here immediately." I approached her, trembling; she stripped me and whipped me severely with a cowhide until she was exhausted. She didn’t stop until she got tired. When my master returned home at night, she told him about my mistake, and he became furious, swearing loudly. After calling me every vile name he could think of (too terrible to say in England), and hitting me several times, he said, "I’ll come home tomorrow at noon to give you a hundred lashes." He kept his promise—oh, how sad for me! I can hardly forget it. He tied me up on a ladder and whipped me a hundred times with his own hand, while Master Benjy stood by to count the lashes. After some time, he paused to catch his breath; then, after resting, he whipped me again and again until he was completely worn out and so hot (because it was very humid) that he nearly fainted in his chair. While my mistress went to get him a drink, there was a terrifying earthquake. Part of the roof collapsed, and everything in the house went—clatter, clatter, clatter. Oh, I thought the end was near; and I was so sore from the beating that I hardly cared whether I lived or died. The ground was groaning and shaking; everything was tumbling about, and my mistress and the slaves were screaming and shouting, "The earthquake! The earthquake!" It was a dreadful day for all of us.
During the confusion I crawled away on my hands and knees, and laid myself down under the steps of the piazza, in front of the house. I was in a dreadful state—my body all blood and bruises, and I could not help moaning piteously. The other slaves, when they saw me, shook their heads and said, "Poor child! poor child!"—I lay there till the morning, careless of what might happen, for life was very weak in me, and I wished more than ever to die. But when we are very young, death always seems a great way off, and it would not come that night to me. The next morning I was forced by my master to rise and go about my usual work, though my body and limbs were so stiff and sore, that I could not move without the greatest pain.—Nevertheless, even after all this severe punishment, I never heard the last of that jar; my mistress was always throwing it in my face.
During the chaos, I crawled away on my hands and knees and lay down under the steps of the porch in front of the house. I was in terrible shape—my body was covered in blood and bruises, and I couldn't help but moan in misery. The other slaves, seeing me, shook their heads and said, "Poor child! Poor child!"—I stayed there until morning, indifferent to what might happen, since I felt so weak and wished more than ever to die. But when we’re very young, death seems far away, and it didn’t come for me that night. The next morning, my master forced me to get up and do my usual work, even though my body and limbs were so stiff and sore that I could barely move without excruciating pain. Still, even after all this harsh punishment, I never heard the end of that incident; my mistress was always bringing it up.
Some little time after this, one of the cows got loose from the stake, and eat one of the sweet-potatoe slips. I was milking when my master found it out. He came to me, and without any more ado, stooped down, and taking off his heavy boot, he struck me such a severe blow in the small of my back, that I shrieked with agony, and thought I was killed; and I feel a weakness in that part to this day. The cow was[9] frightened at his violence, and kicked down the pail and spilt the milk all about. My master knew that this accident was his own fault, but he was so enraged that he seemed glad of an excuse to go on with his ill usage. I cannot remember how many licks he gave me then, but he beat me till I was unable to stand, and till he himself was weary.
Some time after that, one of the cows got loose from the stake and ate one of the sweet potato slips. I was milking when my master discovered it. He came over to me, and without any hesitation, bent down, took off his heavy boot, and struck me with such a severe blow in the lower part of my back that I screamed in agony, thinking I was killed; I still feel weakness in that area to this day. The cow, scared by his outburst, kicked over the pail and spilled milk everywhere. My master knew that this accident was his own fault, but he was so furious that he seemed to welcome an excuse to continue his mistreatment. I can’t remember how many times he hit me then, but he beat me until I couldn’t stand, and until he himself was exhausted.
After this I ran away and went to my mother, who was living with Mr. Richard Darrel. My poor mother was both grieved and glad to see me; grieved because I had been so ill used, and glad because she had not seen me for a long, long while. She dared not receive me into the house, but she hid me up in a hole in the rocks near, and brought me food at night, after every body was asleep. My father, who lived at Crow-Lane, over the salt-water channel, at last heard of my being hid up in the cavern, and he came and took me back to my master. Oh I was loth, loth to go back; but as there was no remedy, I was obliged to submit.
After this, I ran away and went to my mom, who was living with Mr. Richard Darrel. My poor mom was both upset and happy to see me; upset because I had been treated so badly, and happy because she hadn't seen me in such a long time. She couldn't let me into the house, so she hid me in a hole in the nearby rocks and brought me food at night after everyone was asleep. My dad, who lived at Crow-Lane across the salt-water channel, eventually heard about me hiding in the cave, and he came and took me back to my master. Oh, I was so reluctant, so reluctant to go back; but since there was no other choice, I had to comply.
When we got home, my poor father said to Capt. I——, "Sir, I am sorry that my child should be forced to run away from her owner; but the treatment she has received is enough to break her heart. The sight of her wounds has nearly broke mine.—I entreat you, for the love of God, to forgive her for running away, and that you will be a kind master to her in future." Capt. I—— said I was used as well as I deserved, and that I ought to be punished for running away. I then took courage and said that I could stand the floggings no longer; that I was weary of my life, and therefore I had run away to my mother; but mothers could only weep and mourn over their children, they could not save them from cruel masters—from the whip, the rope, and the cow-skin. He told me to hold my tongue and go about my work, or he would find a way to settle me. He did not, however, flog me that day.
When we got home, my poor dad said to Capt. I——, "Sir, I'm sorry that my child had to run away from her owner, but the way she's been treated is enough to break anyone's heart. Seeing her injuries has almost broken mine too. I beg you, for the love of God, to forgive her for escaping and to be a kind master to her moving forward." Capt. I—— replied that I was treated as well as I deserved and that I should be punished for running away. I then found the courage to say that I couldn't handle the beatings anymore; I was tired of my life, and that’s why I had run away to my mom. But mothers could only weep and mourn for their children; they couldn’t save them from cruel masters—from the whip, the rope, and the cowhide. He told me to shut up and get back to work, or he’d find a way to deal with me. However, he didn’t beat me that day.
For five years after this I remained in his house, and almost daily received the same harsh treatment. At length he put me on board a sloop, and to my great joy sent me away to Turk's Island. I was not permitted to see my mother or father, or poor sisters and brothers, to say good bye, though going away to a strange land, and might never see them again. Oh the Buckra people who keep slaves think that black people are like cattle, without natural affection. But my heart tells me it is far otherwise.
For five years after this, I stayed in his house and almost every day faced the same harsh treatment. Eventually, he put me on a sloop and, to my great relief, sent me off to Turk's Island. I wasn't allowed to say goodbye to my mother or father, or my poor sisters and brothers, even though I was leaving for a strange land and might never see them again. Oh, the white people who keep slaves think that Black people are like cattle, lacking natural affection. But my heart knows that this is far from the truth.
We were nearly four weeks on the voyage, which was unusually long. Sometimes we had a light breeze, sometimes a great calm, and the ship made no way; so that our provisions and water ran very low, and we were put upon short allowance. I should almost have been starved had it not been for the kindness of a black man called Anthony, and his wife, who had brought their own victuals, and shared them with me.
We spent almost four weeks on the journey, which was unusually long. Sometimes we had a light breeze, other times it was completely still, and the ship made no progress; as a result, our food and water supplies ran very low, and we had to ration what we had. I would have nearly starved if it hadn't been for the kindness of a black man named Anthony and his wife, who brought their own food and shared it with me.
When we went ashore at the Grand Quay, the captain sent me to the house of my new master, Mr. D——, to whom Captain I——had sold me. Grand Quay is a small town upon a sandbank; the houses low and built of wood. Such was my new master's. The first person I saw, on my arrival, was Mr. D——, a stout sulky looking man, who carried me through the hall to show me to his wife and children. Next day I was put up by the vendue master to know how much I was worth, and I was valued at one hundred pounds currency.[10]
When we arrived at the Grand Quay, the captain sent me to the home of my new owner, Mr. D——, who Captain I—— had sold me to. Grand Quay is a small town built on a sandbank, with low wooden houses. That’s where my new master lived. The first person I saw when I got there was Mr. D——, a hefty, grumpy-looking man, who led me through the hall to introduce me to his wife and kids. The next day, the auctioneer assessed me to determine my worth, and I was valued at one hundred pounds currency.[10]
My new master was one of the owners or holders of the salt ponds, and he received a certain sum for every slave that worked upon his premises, whether they were young or old. This sum was allowed him out of the profits arising from the salt works. I was immediately sent to work in the salt water with the rest of the slaves. This work was perfectly new to me. I was given a half barrel and a shovel, and had to stand up to my knees in the water, from four o'clock in the morning till nine, when we were given some Indian corn boiled in water, which we were obliged to swallow as fast as we could for fear the rain should come on and melt the salt. We were then called again to our tasks, and worked through the heat of the day; the sun flaming upon our heads like fire, and raising salt blisters in those parts which were not completely covered. Our feet and legs, from standing in the salt water for so many hours, soon became full of dreadful boils, which eat down in some cases to the very bone, afflicting the sufferers with great torment. We came home at twelve; ate our corn soup, called blawly, as fast as we could, and went back to our employment till dark at night. We then shovelled up the salt in large heaps, and went down to the sea, where we washed the pickle from our limbs, and cleaned the barrows and shovels from the salt. When we returned to the house, our master gave us each our allowance of raw Indian corn, which we pounded in a mortar and boiled in water for our suppers.
My new master was one of the owners of the salt ponds, and he received a set payment for every slave that worked on his land, no matter their age. This amount came from the profits of the salt works. I was quickly sent to work in the saltwater with the other slaves. This job was completely new to me. I was given a half barrel and a shovel and had to stand in the water up to my knees from four in the morning until nine, when we were given some boiled Indian corn, which we had to eat as quickly as we could in case it rained and melted the salt. After that, we returned to work in the heat of the day; the sun blazed down on us, causing salt blisters in the areas that weren’t fully covered. Our feet and legs, after hours of standing in the saltwater, soon developed horrible boils that sometimes went all the way to the bone, causing immense pain. We came home at noon, ate our corn soup, called blawly, as fast as we could, and went back to work until it was dark. We then shoveled the salt into large heaps and went down to the sea, where we washed off the salt from our bodies and cleaned the barrels and shovels. When we got back to the house, our master gave us each our portion of raw Indian corn, which we pounded in a mortar and boiled in water for dinner.
We slept in a long shed, divided into narrow slips, like the stalls used for cattle. Boards fixed upon stakes driven into the ground, without mat or covering, were our only beds. On Sundays, after we had washed the salt bags, and done other work required of us, we went into the bush and cut the long soft grass, of which we made trusses for our legs and feet to rest upon, for they were so full of the salt boils that we could get no rest lying upon the bare boards.
We slept in a long shed, divided into narrow sections, like the stalls used for cattle. Boards propped up on stakes driven into the ground, without any mats or coverings, were our only beds. On Sundays, after we washed the salt bags and completed other tasks assigned to us, we went into the bush and cut the long, soft grass. We made bundles from this grass to rest our legs and feet on, since they were so sore from the salt boils that we couldn't get any rest lying on the bare boards.
Though we worked from morning till night, there was no satisfying Mr. D——. I hoped, when I left Capt. I——, that I should have been better off, but I found it was but going from one butcher to another. There was this difference between them: my former master used to beat me while raging and foaming with passion; Mr. D—— was usually quite calm. He would stand by and give orders for a slave to be cruelly whipped, and assist in the punishment, without moving a muscle of his face; walking about and taking snuff with the greatest composure. Nothing could touch his hard heart—neither sighs, nor tears, nor prayers, nor streaming blood; he was deaf to our cries, and careless of our sufferings. Mr. D—— has often stripped me naked, hung me up by the wrists, and beat me with the cow-skin, with his own hand, till my body was raw with gashes. Yet there was nothing very remarkable in this; for it might serve as a sample of the common usage of the slaves on that horrible island.
Though we worked from morning till night, Mr. D—— was never satisfied. I thought I'd have it better after leaving Capt. I——, but it was just switching from one cruel master to another. The difference between them was this: my previous master would beat me while furious and out of control; Mr. D—— was usually calm. He would stand by and give orders for a slave to be harshly whipped, and assist in the punishment without a hint of emotion on his face, casually walking around and taking snuff with complete composure. Nothing could touch his cold heart—no sighs, tears, prayers, or bloodshed; he was deaf to our cries and indifferent to our pain. Mr. D—— often stripped me naked, hung me by my wrists, and beat me with a cowhide whip, doing it himself until my body was covered in wounds. Yet, this was nothing out of the ordinary; it was typical treatment for slaves on that dreadful island.
Owing to the boils in my feet, I was unable to wheel the barrow fast through the sand, which got into the sores, and made me stumble at every step; and my master, having no pity for my sufferings from this cause, rendered them far more intolerable, by chastising me for not being able to move so fast as he wished me. Another of our employments was to row a little way off from the shore in a boat, and dive[11] for large stones to build a wall round our master's house. This was very hard work; and the great waves breaking over us continually, made us often so giddy that we lost our footing, and were in danger of being drowned.
Because of the boils on my feet, I couldn't push the wheelbarrow quickly through the sand, which got into my sores and made me trip with every step. My master, showing no sympathy for my pain, only made things worse by punishing me for not moving as fast as he wanted. Another task we had was to row a short distance from the shore in a boat and dive[11] for large stones to build a wall around our master's house. This was very hard work, and the big waves crashing over us often made us so dizzy that we lost our balance and risked drowning.
Ah, poor me!—my tasks were never ended. Sick or well, it was work—work—work!—After the diving season was over, we were sent to the South Creek, with large bills, to cut up mangoes to burn lime with. Whilst one party of slaves were thus employed, another were sent to the other side of the island to break up coral out of the sea.
Ah, poor me!—my tasks never seemed to end. Sick or well, it was work—work—work!—After the diving season was over, we were sent to South Creek with big bills to chop up mangoes for burning lime. While one group of workers was busy with that, another group was sent to the other side of the island to break up coral from the sea.
When we were ill, let our complaint be what it might, the only medicine given to us was a great bowl of hot salt water, with salt mixed with it, which made us very sick. If we could not keep up with the rest of the gang of slaves, we were put in the stocks, and severely flogged the next morning. Yet, not the less, our master expected, after we had thus been kept from our rest, and our limbs rendered stiff and sore with ill usage, that we should still go through the ordinary tasks of the day all the same.—Sometimes we had to work all night, measuring salt to load a vessel; or turning a machine to draw water out of the sea for the salt-making. Then we had no sleep—no rest—but were forced to work as fast as we could, and go on again all next day the same as usual. Work—work—work—Oh that Turk's Island was a horrible place! The people in England, I am sure, have never found out what is carried on there. Cruel, horrible place!
When we were sick, no matter what our complaint was, the only medicine we received was a big bowl of hot salt water, mixed with more salt, which made us feel even worse. If we couldn’t keep up with the rest of the group, we were locked in stocks and given a severe beating the next morning. Still, our master expected that even after being deprived of rest and our bodies made stiff and sore from mistreatment, we would continue with the usual daily tasks. Sometimes, we had to work through the night, measuring salt to load a ship or operating a machine to draw seawater for salt production. We had no time to sleep or rest, forced to work as quickly as we could and then do it all over again the next day. Work—work—work—Oh, that Turk's Island was a terrible place! I’m sure the people in England have no idea what goes on there. A cruel, horrible place!
Mr. D—— had a slave called old Daniel, whom he used to treat in the most cruel manner. Poor Daniel was lame in the hip, and could not keep up with the rest of the slaves; and our master would order him to be stripped and laid down on the ground, and have him beaten with a rod of rough briar till his skin was quite red and raw. He would then call for a bucket of salt, and fling upon the raw flesh till the man writhed on the ground like a worm, and screamed aloud with agony. This poor man's wounds were never healed, and I have often seen them full of maggots, which increased his torments to an intolerable degree. He was an object of pity and terror to the whole gang of slaves, and in his wretched case we saw, each of us, our own lot, if we should live to be as old.
Mr. D—— had a slave named old Daniel, whom he treated in the most brutal way. Poor Daniel was lame in the hip, and couldn’t keep up with the other slaves; our master would order him to be stripped and laid down on the ground, then beaten with a rough briar rod until his skin was bright red and raw. He would then call for a bucket of salt and throw it on Daniel’s raw flesh until the man writhed on the ground like a worm and screamed in agony. This poor man’s wounds never healed, and I often saw them swarming with maggots, which made his suffering even worse. He became an image of both pity and fear for all the other slaves, and in his miserable condition, we all saw a reflection of our own fate if we lived to be as old.
Oh the horrors of slavery!—How the thought of it pains my heart! But the truth ought to be told of it; and what my eyes have seen I think it is my duty to relate; for few people in England know what slavery is. I have been a slave—I have felt what a slave feels, and I know what a slave knows; and I would have all the good people in England to know it too, that they may break our chains, and set us free.
Oh, the horrors of slavery! How much the thought of it hurts my heart! But the truth must be told; and what I've witnessed, I feel it's my duty to share, because few people in England truly understand what slavery is. I have been a slave—I have felt what a slave feels, and I know what a slave knows; and I want all the good people in England to know it too, so they can break our chains and set us free.
Mr. D—— had another slave called Ben. He being very hungry, stole a little rice one night after he came in from work, and cooked it for his supper. But his master soon discovered the theft; locked him up all night; and kept him without food till one o'clock the next day. He then hung Ben up by his hands, and beat him from time to time till the slaves came in at night. We found the poor creature hung up when we came home; with a pool of blood beneath him, and our master still licking him. But this was not the worst. My master's son was in the habit of stealing the rice and rum. Ben had seen him do this, and thought he might do the same, and when master found out that Ben[12] had stolen the rice and swore to punish him, he tried to excuse himself by saying that Master Dickey did the same thing every night. The lad denied it to his father, and was so angry with Ben for informing against him, that out of revenge he ran and got a bayonet, and whilst the poor wretch was suspended by his hands and writhing under his wounds, he run it quite through his foot. I was not by when he did it, but I saw the wound when I came home, and heard Ben tell the manner in which it was done.
Mr. D—— had another slave named Ben. Being very hungry, he stole a little rice one night after coming in from work and cooked it for his dinner. But his master soon found out about the theft; locked him up all night; and left him without food until one o'clock the next day. He then hung Ben by his hands and beat him now and then until the other slaves came in at night. We found the poor guy hanging when we got home, with a pool of blood beneath him, and our master still hitting him. But that wasn't the worst. My master's son regularly stole rice and rum. Ben had seen him do this and thought he could do the same, and when the master discovered that Ben had stolen the rice and vowed to punish him, Ben tried to defend himself by saying that Master Dickey did the same thing every night. The boy denied it to his father and was so angry with Ben for telling on him that out of revenge, he ran and got a bayonet, and while the poor guy was hanging by his hands and writhing in pain, he shoved it right through his foot. I wasn't there when it happened, but I saw the wound when I got home and heard Ben explain how it was done.
I must say something more about this cruel son of a cruel father.—He had no heart—no fear of God; he had been brought up by a bad father in a bad path, and he delighted to follow in the same steps. There was a little old woman among the slaves called Sarah, who was nearly past work; and, Master Dickey being the overseer of the slaves just then, this poor creature, who was subject to several bodily infirmities, and was not quite right in her head, did not wheel the barrow fast enough to please him. He threw her down on the ground, and after beating her severely, he took her up in his arms and flung her among the prickly-pear bushes, which are all covered over with sharp venomous prickles. By this her naked flesh was so grievously wounded, that her body swelled and festered all over, and she died a few days after. In telling my own sorrows, I cannot pass by those of my fellow-slaves—for when I think of my own griefs, I remember theirs.
I need to say a bit more about this heartless son of a heartless father. He had no compassion and no fear of God; he was raised by a terrible father on a terrible path, and he took pleasure in following the same way. There was an elderly woman among the slaves named Sarah, who was almost too weak to work; and since Master Dickey was the overseer at that moment, this poor woman, who had several physical ailments and wasn’t quite right in the head, didn’t move the barrow fast enough for his liking. He threw her down to the ground, and after beating her badly, he picked her up and tossed her into a patch of prickly pear bushes, which are covered in sharp, painful thorns. As a result, her bare skin was severely injured, causing her body to swell and become infected, and she died a few days later. In sharing my own pain, I can't ignore the suffering of my fellow slaves—because when I think about my own troubles, I remember theirs.
I think it was about ten years I had worked in the salt ponds at Turk's Island, when my master left off business, and retired to a house he had in Bermuda, leaving his son to succeed him in the island. He took me with him to wait upon his daughters; and I was joyful, for I was sick, sick of Turk's Island, and my heart yearned to see my native place again, my mother, and my kindred.
I think it had been about ten years since I started working in the salt ponds on Turk's Island when my master decided to leave the business and move to a house he had in Bermuda, leaving his son to take over on the island. He brought me along to help take care of his daughters, and I was thrilled because I was tired, so tired of Turk's Island, and my heart longed to see my hometown again, my mother, and my family.
I had seen my poor mother during the time I was a slave in Turk's Island. One Sunday morning I was on the beach with some of the slaves, and we saw a sloop come in loaded with slaves to work in the salt water. We got a boat and went aboard. When I came upon the deck I asked the black people, "Is there any one here for me?" "Yes," they said, "your mother." I thought they said this in jest—I could scarcely believe them for joy; but when I saw my poor mammy my joy was turned to sorrow, for she had gone from her senses. "Mammy," I said, "is this you?" She did not know me. "Mammy," I said, "what's the matter?" She began to talk foolishly, and said that she had been under the vessel's bottom. They had been overtaken by a violent storm at sea. My poor mother had never been on the sea before, and she was so ill, that she lost her senses, and it was long before she came quite to herself again. She had a sweet child with her—a little sister I had never seen, about four years of age, called Rebecca. I took her on shore with me, for I felt I should love her directly; and I kept her with me a week. Poor little thing! her's has been a sad life, and continues so to this day. My mother worked for some years on the island, but was taken back to Bermuda some time before my master carried me again thither.[7]
I saw my poor mother while I was a slave in Turk's Island. One Sunday morning, I was at the beach with some of the other slaves when we saw a sloop arrive filled with slaves meant to work in the saltwater. We managed to get a boat and went aboard. When I reached the deck, I asked the black people, "Is there anyone here for me?" "Yes," they replied, "your mother." I thought they were joking—I could hardly believe my ears from the joy; but when I finally saw my poor mom, my happiness turned to sorrow because she had lost her mind. "Mom," I said, "is that you?" She didn’t recognize me. "Mom," I asked, "what happened?" She started talking nonsense and said she had been under the bottom of the ship. They had experienced a violent storm at sea. My poor mother had never been on the ocean before, and she was so sick that she lost her sanity, and it took a long time before she fully recovered. She had a sweet little girl with her—a younger sister I'd never met, about four years old, named Rebecca. I took her ashore with me because I felt an instant love for her, and I kept her with me for a week. Poor little thing! Her life has been sad, and it still is to this day. My mother worked for several years on the island but was taken back to Bermuda some time before my master brought me there again.[7]
After I left Turk's Island, I was told by some negroes that came over from it, that the poor slaves had built up a place with boughs and leaves, where they might meet for prayers, but the white people pulled it down twice, and would not allow them even a shed for prayers. A flood came down soon after and washed away many houses, filled the place with sand, and overflowed the ponds: and I do think that this was for their wickedness; for the Buckra men[8] there were very wicked. I saw and heard much that was very very bad at that place.
After I left Turk's Island, some Black people who came over from there told me that the poor slaves had built a place with branches and leaves where they could gather to pray, but the white people tore it down twice and wouldn't even allow them a shed for their prayers. Shortly after, a flood came and washed away many houses, filled the area with sand, and overflowed the ponds. I truly believe this happened because of their wickedness; the white men there were very cruel. I saw and heard a lot of terrible things at that place.
I was several years the slave of Mr. D—— after I returned to my native place. Here I worked in the grounds. My work was planting and hoeing sweet-potatoes, Indian corn, plantains, bananas, cabbages, pumpkins, onions, &c. I did all the household work, and attended upon a horse and cow besides,—going also upon all errands. I had to curry the horse—to clean and feed him—and sometimes to ride him a little. I had more than enough to do—but still it was not so very bad as Turk's Island.
I was a slave to Mr. D—— for several years after I returned to my hometown. I worked in the fields, planting and hoeing sweet potatoes, corn, plantains, bananas, cabbage, pumpkins, onions, and more. I handled all the household chores and took care of a horse and a cow, plus I ran all kinds of errands. I had to groom the horse, clean and feed him, and sometimes ride him a bit. I had more than enough to keep me busy, but it wasn’t as bad as Turk’s Island.
My old master often got drunk, and then he would get in a fury with his daughter, and beat her till she was not fit to be seen. I remember on one occasion, I had gone to fetch water, and when I Was coming up the hill I heard a great screaming; I ran as fast as I could to the house, put down the water, and went into the chamber, where I found my master beating Miss D—— dreadfully. I strove with all my strength to get her away from him; for she was all black and blue with bruises. He had beat her with his fist, and almost killed her. The people gave me credit for getting her away. He turned round and began to lick me. Then I said, "Sir, this is not Turk's Island." I can't repeat his answer, the words were too wicked—too bad to say. He wanted to treat me the same in Bermuda as he had done in Turk's Island.
My old master often got drunk, and then he'd get furious with his daughter and hit her until she was barely able to be seen. I remember one time, I had gone to get water, and as I was coming up the hill, I heard a lot of screaming; I ran as fast as I could to the house, put down the water, and went into the room, where I found my master beating Miss D—— badly. I struggled with all my strength to pull her away from him because she was covered in bruises. He had punched her and nearly killed her. People appreciated my efforts to get her away. He turned around and started to hit me. Then I said, "Sir, this isn't Turk's Island." I can't repeat his response, as the words were too horrible—too foul to say. He wanted to treat me the same in Bermuda as he had in Turk's Island.
He had an ugly fashion of stripping himself quite naked, and ordering me then to wash him in a tub of water. This was worse to me than all the licks. Sometimes when he called me to wash him I would not come, my eyes were so full of shame. He would then come to beat me. One time I had plates and knives in my hand, and I dropped both plates and knives, and some of the plates were broken. He struck me so severely for this, that at last I defended myself, for I thought it was high time to do so. I then told him I would not live longer with him, for he was a very indecent man—very spiteful, and too indecent; with no shame for his servants, no shame for his own flesh. So I went away to a neighbouring house and sat down and cried till the next morning, when I went home again, not knowing what else to do.
He had a really inappropriate habit of stripping completely naked and then ordering me to wash him in a tub of water. This was worse for me than all the beatings. Sometimes when he called me to wash him, I wouldn’t go because I felt so ashamed. He would then come and hit me. One time, I was holding plates and knives, and I dropped both, breaking some of the plates. He hit me so hard for that that I finally decided to stand up for myself because I thought it was time to do so. I told him I wouldn’t live with him any longer because he was a very indecent man—really spiteful and too shameless; he had no respect for his servants and no shame for himself. So I left for a nearby house and sat down, crying until the next morning, when I went back home, not knowing what else to do.
After that I was hired to work at Cedar Hills, and every Saturday night I paid the money to my master. I had plenty of work to do there—plenty of washing; but yet I made myself pretty comfortable. I earned two dollars and a quarter a week, which is twenty pence a day.
After that, I got a job at Cedar Hills, and every Saturday night I paid my master. I had a lot of work to do there—lots of washing—but I managed to make myself pretty comfortable. I earned two dollars and a quarter a week, which is twenty-five cents a day.
During the time I worked there, I heard that Mr. John Wood was going to Antigua. I felt a great wish to go there, and I went to Mr. D——, and asked him to let me go in Mr. Wood's service. Mr. Wood did not then want to purchase me; it was my own fault that I came under him, I was so anxious to go. It was ordained to be, I suppose; God led me there. The truth is, I did not wish to be any longer the slave of my indecent master.
During the time I worked there, I heard that Mr. John Wood was heading to Antigua. I really wanted to go, so I approached Mr. D—— and asked him to allow me to join Mr. Wood's service. At that point, Mr. Wood wasn't looking to buy me; it was my own eagerness that put me in his control. I guess it was meant to happen; I believe God guided me there. The truth is, I didn’t want to be the slave of my inappropriate master any longer.
Mr. Wood took me with him to Antigua, to the town of St. John's, where he lived. This was about fifteen years ago. He did not then know whether I was to be sold; but Mrs. Wood found that I could work, and she wanted to buy me. Her husband then wrote to my master to inquire whether I was to be sold? Mr. D—— wrote in reply, "that I should not be sold to any one that would treat me ill." It was strange he should say this, when he had treated me so ill himself. So I was purchased by Mr. Wood for 300 dollars, (or £100 Bermuda currency.)[9]
Mr. Wood took me with him to Antigua, to the town of St. John's, where he lived. This was about fifteen years ago. He didn’t know at that time if I was going to be sold, but Mrs. Wood found out that I could work, and she wanted to buy me. Her husband then wrote to my master to check if I was to be sold. Mr. D—— replied that I shouldn’t be sold to anyone who would treat me poorly. It was odd for him to say this when he had treated me so badly himself. So, Mr. Wood bought me for 300 dollars (or £100 in Bermuda currency).[9]
My work there was to attend the chambers and nurse the child, and to go down to the pond and wash clothes. But I soon fell ill of the rheumatism, and grew so very lame that I was forced to walk with a stick. I got the Saint Anthony's fire, also, in my left leg, and became quite a cripple. No one cared much to come near me, and I was ill a long long time; for several months I could not lift the limb. I had to lie in a little old out-house, that was swarming with bugs and other vermin, which tormented me greatly; but I had no other place to lie in. I got the rheumatism by catching cold at the pond side, from washing in the fresh water; in the salt water I never got cold. The person who lived in next yard, (a Mrs. Greene,) could not bear to hear my cries and groans. She was kind, and used to send an old slave woman to help me, who sometimes brought me a little soup. When the doctor found I was so ill, he said I must be put into a bath of hot water. The old slave got the bark of some bush that was good for the pains, which she boiled in the hot water, and every night she came and put me into the bath, and did what she could for me: I don't know what I should have done, or what would have become of me, had it not been for her.—My mistress, it is true, did send me a little food; but no one from our family came near me but the cook, who used to shove my food in at the door, and say, "Molly, Molly, there's your dinner." My mistress did not care to take any trouble about me; and if the Lord had not put it into the hearts of the neighbours to be kind to me, I must, I really think, have lain and died.
My job there was to take care of the room and look after the child, and to go down to the pond to wash clothes. But I quickly got really sick with rheumatism and became so lame that I had to walk with a cane. I also developed Saint Anthony's fire in my left leg and ended up quite disabled. Nobody wanted to be near me, and I was sick for a really long time; for several months, I couldn't even lift my leg. I had to lie in a small old shed that was crawling with bugs and other pests, which bothered me a lot; but I had no other place to stay. I caught the rheumatism from getting cold by the pond while washing in the fresh water; I never catch a cold in salt water. The woman who lived next door, Mrs. Greene, couldn’t stand to hear my cries and groans. She was kind and used to send an elderly woman, who sometimes brought me a little soup. When the doctor realized how sick I was, he said I needed to be put in a hot water bath. The old woman got some bark from a bush that helped with the pain, boiled it in the hot water, and every night she came to give me the bath and did what she could for me: I really don’t know what I would have done, or what would have happened to me, if it hadn't been for her. My mistress did send me a little food, but no one from my family came near me except the cook, who would shove my food through the door and say, "Molly, Molly, there's your dinner." My mistress didn’t want to bother with me, and if the neighbors hadn’t been kind, I truly think I would have just lain there and died.
It was a long time before I got well enough to work in the house. Mrs. Wood, in the meanwhile, hired a mulatto woman to nurse the child; but she was such a fine lady she wanted to be mistress over me. I thought it very hard for a coloured woman to have rule over me because I was a slave and she was free. Her name was Martha Wilcox; she was a saucy woman, very saucy; and she went and complained of [15]me, without cause, to my mistress, and made her angry with me. Mrs. Wood told me that if I did not mind what I was about, she would get my master to strip me and give me fifty lashes: "You have been used to the whip," she said, "and you shall have it here." This was the first time she threatened to have me flogged; and she gave me the threatening so strong of what she would have done to me, that I thought I should have fallen down at her feet, I was so vexed and hurt by her words. The mulatto woman was rejoiced to have power to keep me down. She was constantly making mischief; there was no living for the slaves—no peace after she came.
It took a long time for me to feel well enough to work in the house. In the meantime, Mrs. Wood hired a mixed-race woman to care for the child, but she acted like she was the boss and wanted to control me. I found it really unfair for a woman of color to have power over me when I was a slave and she was free. Her name was Martha Wilcox; she was quite sassy and complained about me to my mistress without any reason, which made Mrs. Wood angry with me. Mrs. Wood warned me that if I didn't behave, she would get my master to strip me and whip me fifty times: "You’ve been used to the whip," she said, "and you will get it here." That was the first time she threatened to have me flogged, and the way she said it made me feel like I might collapse at her feet from how upset and hurt I was by her words. The mixed-race woman was thrilled to have the power to keep me in line. She was always causing trouble; there was no peace for the slaves after she arrived.
I was also sent by Mrs. Wood to be put in the Cage one night, and was next morning flogged, by the magistrate's order, at her desire; and this all for a quarrel I had about a pig with another slave woman. I was flogged on my naked back on this occasion: although I was in no fault after all; for old Justice Dyett, when we came before him, said that I was in the right, and ordered the pig to be given to me. This was about two or three years after I came to Antigua.
I was also sent by Mrs. Wood to spend a night in the Cage, and the next morning I was whipped at the magistrate's order, as she requested; all because of an argument I had over a pig with another slave woman. I was whipped on my bare back this time; even though I wasn’t at fault, because old Justice Dyett said I was in the right when we went before him and ordered the pig to be given to me. This happened about two or three years after I arrived in Antigua.
When we moved from the middle of the town to the Point, I used to be in the house and do all the work and mind the children, though still very ill with the rheumatism. Every week I had to wash two large bundles of clothes, as much as a boy could help me to lift; but I could give no satisfaction. My mistress was always abusing and fretting after me. It is not possible to tell all her ill language.—One day she followed me foot after foot scolding and rating me. I bore in silence a great deal of ill words: at last my heart was quite full, and I told her that she ought not to use me so;—that when I was ill I might have lain and died for what she cared; and no one would then come near me to nurse me, because they were afraid of my mistress. This was a great affront. She called her husband and told him what I had said. He flew into a passion: but did not beat me then; he only abused and swore at me; and then gave me a note and bade me go and look for an owner. Not that he meant to sell me; but he did this to please his wife and to frighten me. I went to Adam White, a cooper, a free black, who had money, and asked him to buy me. He went directly to Mr. Wood, but was informed that I was not to be sold. The next day my master whipped me.
When we moved from the center of town to the Point, I was stuck at home doing all the chores and taking care of the kids, even though I was still really sick with rheumatism. Every week, I had to wash two huge bundles of clothes—enough for a boy to help me lift—but I could never satisfy my mistress. She was always complaining and yelling at me. It’s hard to explain just how harsh her words were. One day, she followed me around, scolding me step by step. I put up with a lot of her insults in silence, but eventually, I couldn’t take it anymore and told her she shouldn’t treat me like that—that when I was sick, I could have just laid there and died without her caring, and no one would come to help me because they were scared of her. That really offended her. She called her husband and told him what I said. He got really angry, but he didn’t hit me that time; he just cursed at me and then handed me a note telling me to go find an owner. He didn’t actually mean to sell me, but he did it to please his wife and scare me. I went to Adam White, a free black cooper who had some money, and asked him to buy me. He went straight to Mr. Wood, but was told that I wasn’t for sale. The next day, my master whipped me.
Another time (about five years ago) my mistress got vexed with me, because I fell sick and I could not keep on with my work. She complained to her husband, and he sent me off again to look for an owner. I went to a Mr. Burchell, showed him the note, and asked him to buy me for my own benefit; for I had saved about 100 dollars, and hoped, with a little help, to purchase my freedom. He accordingly went to my master:—"Mr. Wood," he said, "Molly has brought me a note that she wants an owner. If you intend to sell her, I may as well buy her as another." My master put him off and said that he did not mean to sell me. I was very sorry at this, for I had no comfort with Mrs. Wood, and I wished greatly to get my freedom.
Another time, about five years ago, my boss got mad at me because I got sick and couldn’t keep up with my work. She complained to her husband, and he sent me off again to find a new owner. I went to Mr. Burchell, showed him the note, and asked him to buy me for my own benefit because I had saved up about 100 dollars and hoped that with a little help, I could purchase my freedom. He then went to my master: “Mr. Wood,” he said, “Molly has brought me a note saying she wants a new owner. If you’re planning to sell her, I may as well buy her as anyone else.” My master brushed him off and said that he didn’t intend to sell me. I was very disappointed by this because I had no comfort with Mrs. Wood, and I really wanted to gain my freedom.
The way in which I made my money was this.—When my master and mistress went from home, as they sometimes did, and left me to take care of the house and premises, I had a good deal of time to myself, and made the most of it. I took in washing, and sold coffee and yams[16] and other provisions to the captains of ships. I did not sit still idling during the absence of my owners; for I wanted, by all honest means, to earn money to buy my freedom. Sometimes I bought a hog cheap on board ship, and sold it for double the money on shore; and I also earned a good deal by selling coffee. By this means I by degrees acquired a little cash. A gentleman also lent me some to help to buy my freedom—but when I could not get free he got it back again. His name was Captain Abbot.
The way I made my money was like this: When my boss and his wife were out of the house, which they did sometimes, they left me to take care of things. This gave me a lot of free time, and I took advantage of it. I did laundry and sold coffee, yams[16], and other supplies to the ship captains. I didn’t just sit around while they were away; I wanted to earn money honestly to buy my freedom. Sometimes I bought a pig for cheap on a ship and sold it for double the price on land, and I also made quite a bit from selling coffee. Through this, I gradually saved up some cash. A gentleman even loaned me some money to help buy my freedom, but when I couldn’t get free, he took it back. His name was Captain Abbot.
My master and mistress went on one occasion into the country, to Date Hill, for change of air, and carried me with them to take charge of the children, and to do the work of the house. While I was in the country, I saw how the field negroes are worked in Antigua. They are worked very hard and fed but scantily. They are called out to work before daybreak, and come home after dark; and then each has to heave his bundle of grass for the cattle in the pen. Then, on Sunday morning, each slave has to go out and gather a large bundle of grass; and, when they bring it home, they have all to sit at the manager's door and wait till he come out: often have they to wait there till past eleven o'clock, without any breakfast. After that, those that have yams or potatoes, or fire-wood to sell, hasten to market to buy a dog's worth[10] of salt fish, or pork, which is a great treat for them. Some of them buy a little pickle out of the shad barrels, which they call sauce, to season their yams and Indian corn. It is very wrong, I know, to work on Sunday or go to market; but will not God call the Buckra men to answer for this on the great day of judgment—since they will give the slaves no other day?
My master and mistress once went to the countryside, to Date Hill, for some fresh air, and they took me along to look after the kids and handle the household chores. While I was in the country, I witnessed how the field workers are treated in Antigua. They work extremely hard and are poorly fed. They are called to work before sunrise and return home after dark; after that, each one has to carry their bundle of grass for the cattle in the pen. Then, every Sunday morning, each slave must go out to gather a large bundle of grass. When they bring it back, they all have to sit at the manager's door and wait for him to come out: often, they have to wait until after eleven o'clock without having breakfast. After that, those who have yams, potatoes, or firewood to sell rush to the market to buy a small amount of salt fish or pork, which is a real treat for them. Some of them buy a little pickle from the herring barrels, which they call sauce, to season their yams and corn. I know it’s wrong to work or go to market on Sunday, but won’t God hold the white people accountable for this on the day of judgment, since they won’t give the slaves another day?
While we were at Date Hill Christmas came; and the slave woman who had the care of the place (which then belonged to Mr. Roberts the marshal), asked me to go with her to her husband's house, to a Methodist meeting for prayer, at a plantation called Winthorps. I went; and they were the first prayers I ever understood. One woman prayed; and then they all sung a hymn; then there was another prayer and another hymn; and then they all spoke by turns of their own griefs as sinners. The husband of the woman I went with was a black driver. His name was Henry. He confessed that he had treated the slaves very cruelly; but said that he was compelled to obey the orders of his master. He prayed them all to forgive him, and he prayed that God would forgive him. He said it was a horrid thing for a ranger[11] to have sometimes to beat his own wife or sister; but he must do so if ordered by his master.
While we were at Date Hill, Christmas arrived, and the enslaved woman who looked after the place (which then belonged to Mr. Roberts, the marshal) asked me to go with her to her husband’s house for a Methodist prayer meeting at a plantation called Winthorps. I went, and those were the first prayers I ever truly understood. One woman prayed, then they all sang a hymn; after that, there was another prayer and another hymn, and then everyone took turns sharing their own struggles as sinners. The husband of the woman I accompanied was a black driver named Henry. He admitted that he had treated the enslaved people very harshly but claimed he had to follow his master’s orders. He asked everyone to forgive him and prayed for God’s forgiveness. He mentioned how terrible it was for a ranger to sometimes have to beat his own wife or sister, but he had to do it if his master commanded it.
I felt sorry for my sins also. I cried the whole night, but I was too much ashamed to speak. I prayed God to forgive me. This meeting had a great impression on my mind, and led my spirit to the Moravian church; so that when I got back to town, I went and prayed to have my name put down in the Missionaries' book; and I followed the church earnestly every opportunity. I did not then tell my mistress about it; for I knew that she would not give me leave to go. But I felt I must go. Whenever I carried the children their lunch at school, I ran round and went to hear the teachers.
I felt bad about my sins too. I cried all night, but I was too ashamed to talk about it. I prayed for God to forgive me. This meeting made a lasting impression on me and drew my spirit to the Moravian church; so when I got back to town, I went and asked to have my name added to the Missionaries' book, and I eagerly pursued the church whenever I could. I didn't tell my mistress about it because I knew she wouldn't allow me to go. But I felt I had to go. Whenever I brought the kids their lunch at school, I would sneak away to listen to the teachers.
The Moravian ladies (Mrs. Richter, Mrs. Olufsen, and Mrs. Sauter) taught me to read in the class; and I got on very fast. In this class there were all sorts of people, old and young, grey headed folks and children; but most of them were free people. After we had done spelling, we tried to read in the Bible. After the reading was over, the missionary gave out a hymn for us to sing. I dearly loved to go to the church, it was so solemn. I never knew rightly that I had much sin till I went there. When I found out that I was a great sinner, I was very sorely grieved, and very much frightened. I used to pray God to pardon my sins for Christ's sake, and forgive me for every thing I had done amiss; and when I went home to my work, I always thought about what I had heard from the missionaries, and wished to be good that I might go to heaven. After a while I was admitted a candidate for the holy Communion.—I had been baptized long before this, in August 1817, by the Rev. Mr. Curtin, of the English Church, after I had been taught to repeat the Creed and the Lord's Prayer. I wished at that time to attend a Sunday School taught by Mr. Curtin, but he would not receive me without a written note from my master, granting his permission. I did not ask my owner's permission, from the belief that it would be refused; so that I got no farther instruction at that time from the English Church.[12]
The Moravian ladies (Mrs. Richter, Mrs. Olufsen, and Mrs. Sauter) taught me how to read in class, and I progressed quickly. In this class, there were all kinds of people, old and young, gray-haired folks and children; but most of them were free. After we finished spelling, we tried to read from the Bible. Once the reading was done, the missionary had us sing a hymn. I really loved going to church; it felt so solemn. I never really understood how much sin I had until I went there. When I realized I was a great sinner, I was deeply sorrowful and quite scared. I used to pray to God to forgive my sins for Christ's sake and to pardon everything I had done wrong; and when I went home to my work, I always thought about what I had heard from the missionaries and wished to be good so I could go to heaven. After a while, I was accepted as a candidate for Holy Communion. I had been baptized long before this, in August 1817, by Rev. Mr. Curtin of the English Church, after I learned to recite the Creed and the Lord's Prayer. I wanted to attend a Sunday School taught by Mr. Curtin, but he wouldn't take me without a written note from my master giving permission. I didn’t ask my owner for permission, believing it would be denied; so I didn’t receive any further instruction at that time from the English Church.[12]
Some time after I began to attend the Moravian Church, I met with Daniel James, afterwards my dear husband. He was a carpenter and cooper to his trade; an honest, hard-working, decent black man, and a widower. He had purchased his freedom of his mistress, old Mrs. Baker, with money he had earned whilst a slave. When he asked me to marry him, I took time to consider the matter over with myself, and would not say yes till he went to church with me and joined the Moravians. He was very industrious after he bought his freedom; and he had hired a comfortable house, and had convenient things about him. We were joined in marriage, about Christmas 1826, in the Moravian Chapel at Spring Gardens, by the Rev. Mr. Olufsen. We could not be married in the English Church. English marriage is not allowed to slaves; and no free man can marry a slave woman.
Some time after I started going to the Moravian Church, I met Daniel James, who later became my beloved husband. He was a carpenter and cooper by trade; an honest, hardworking, decent Black man, and a widower. He had bought his freedom from his mistress, old Mrs. Baker, using money he had earned while being enslaved. When he asked me to marry him, I took some time to think it over and wouldn’t agree until he attended church with me and joined the Moravians. He was very industrious after gaining his freedom and had rented a comfortable house with all the necessities. We got married around Christmas of 1826 in the Moravian Chapel at Spring Gardens, officiated by Rev. Mr. Olufsen. We couldn’t get married in the English Church. English marriage laws do not permit slaves to marry, and no free man can marry a slave woman.
When Mr. Wood heard of my marriage, he flew into a great rage, and sent for Daniel, who was helping to build a house for his old mistress. Mr. Wood asked him who gave him a right to marry a slave of his? My husband said, "Sir, I am a free man, and thought I had a right to choose a wife; but if I had known Molly was not allowed to have a husband, I should not have asked her to marry me." Mrs. Wood was more vexed about my marriage than her husband. She could not forgive me for getting married, but stirred up Mr. Wood to flog me dreadfully with the horsewhip. I thought it very hard to be whipped at my time of life for getting a husband—I told her so. She said that she would not have nigger men about the yards and premises, or allow a nigger man's clothes to be washed in the same tub where hers were washed. She was fearful, I think, that I should lose her time, in order to wash and do things for my husband: but I had then no time to wash for myself; I was obliged to put out my own clothes, though I was always at the wash-tub.
When Mr. Wood found out about my marriage, he got really angry and called for Daniel, who was busy building a house for his old mistress. Mr. Wood asked him who gave him the right to marry one of his slaves. My husband replied, "Sir, I'm a free man and thought I had the right to choose a wife; but if I had known Molly wasn’t allowed to have a husband, I wouldn’t have asked her to marry me." Mrs. Wood was even more upset about my marriage than her husband. She couldn’t forgive me for getting married and urged Mr. Wood to whip me harshly with the horsewhip. I thought it was really unfair to be whipped at my age for marrying a husband—I told her that. She insisted that she wouldn’t have Black men hanging around the property or let a Black man’s clothes be washed in the same tub as hers. I think she was worried I would take her time away to wash and do things for my husband, but at that time, I had no time even to wash for myself; I had to send my own clothes out, even though I was always at the wash-tub.
I had not much happiness in my marriage, owing to my being a slave. It made my husband sad to see me so ill-treated. Mrs. Wood was always abusing me about him. She did not lick me herself, but she got her husband to do it for her, whilst she fretted the flesh off my bones. Yet for all this she would not sell me. She sold five slaves whilst I was with her; but though she was always finding fault with me, she would not part with me. However, Mr. Wood afterwards allowed Daniel to have a place to live in our yard, which we were very thankful for.
I didn't have much happiness in my marriage because I was a slave. It made my husband sad to see me treated so poorly. Mrs. Wood was always criticizing me about him. She didn’t hit me herself, but she had her husband do it while she stressed me out. Yet, despite all this, she wouldn’t sell me. She sold five slaves while I was with her; but even though she was constantly finding fault with me, she wouldn’t let me go. However, Mr. Wood later allowed Daniel to have a place to stay in our yard, which we were very grateful for.
After this, I fell ill again with the rheumatism, and was sick a long time; but whether sick or well, I had my work to do. About this time I asked my master and mistress to let me buy my own freedom. With the help of Mr. Burchell, I could have found the means to pay Mr. Wood; for it was agreed that I should afterwards, serve Mr. Burchell a while, for the cash he was to advance for me. I was earnest in the request to my owners; but their hearts were hard—too hard to consent. Mrs. Wood was very angry—she grew quite outrageous—she called me a black devil, and asked me who had put freedom into my head. "To be free is very sweet," I said: but she took good care to keep me a slave. I saw her change colour, and I left the room.
After that, I got sick again with rheumatism and was unwell for a long time; but whether I was sick or healthy, I had my work to do. Around this time, I asked my master and mistress if I could buy my own freedom. With Mr. Burchell’s help, I could have raised the money to pay Mr. Wood; it was agreed that I would then work for Mr. Burchell for a while in exchange for the cash he would advance for me. I was serious in my request to my owners, but they were hard-hearted—too hard to agree. Mrs. Wood was very angry—she became quite furious—she called me a black devil and asked who had put the idea of freedom in my head. "Being free is very sweet," I said, but she made sure to keep me a slave. I saw her change color, and I left the room.
About this time my master and mistress were going to England to put their son to school, and bring their daughters home; and they took me with them to take care of the child. I was willing to come to England: I thought that by going there I should probably get cured of my rheumatism, and should return with my master and mistress, quite well, to my husband. My husband was willing for me to come away, for he had heard that my master would free me,—and I also hoped this might prove true; but it was all a false report.
Around this time, my master and mistress were heading to England to enroll their son in school and bring their daughters home, and they took me along to look after the child. I was eager to go to England; I thought that being there might help me get rid of my rheumatism, and I'd return to my husband fully recovered. My husband was okay with me leaving since he had heard that my master would free me—and I hoped that this might actually happen; but it turned out to be a false rumor.
The steward of the ship was very kind to me. He and my husband were in the same class in the Moravian Church. I was thankful that he was so friendly, for my mistress was not kind to me on the passage; and she told me, when she was angry, that she did not intend to treat me any better in England than in the West Indies—that I need not expect it. And she was as good as her word.
The ship's steward was really nice to me. He and my husband were in the same class at the Moravian Church. I was grateful for his friendliness because my mistress wasn’t kind to me during the trip. When she got angry, she told me that she wouldn’t treat me any better in England than she did in the West Indies—that I shouldn’t expect it. And she kept her promise.
When we drew near to England, the rheumatism seized all my limbs worse than ever, and my body was dreadfully swelled. When we landed at the Tower, I shewed my flesh to my mistress, but she took no great notice of it. We were obliged to stop at the tavern till my master got a house; and a day or two after, my mistress sent me down into the wash-house to learn to wash in the English way. In the West Indies we wash with cold water—in England with hot. I told my mistress I was afraid that putting my hands first into the hot water and then[19] into the cold, would increase the pain in my limbs. The doctor had told my mistress long before I came from the West Indies, that I was a sickly body and the washing did not agree with me. But Mrs. Wood would not release me from the tub, so I was forced to do as I could. I grew worse, and could not stand to wash. I was then forced to sit down with the tub before me, and often through pain and weakness was reduced to kneel or to sit down on the floor, to finish my task. When I complained to my mistress of this, she only got into a passion as usual, and said washing in hot water could not hurt any one;—that I was lazy and insolent, and wanted to be free of my work; but that she would make me do it. I thought her very hard on me, and my heart rose up within me. However I kept still at that time, and went down again to wash the child's things; but the English washerwomen who were at work there, when they saw that I was so ill, had pity upon me and washed them for me.
As we neared England, my rheumatism hit me harder than ever, and my body swelled badly. When we landed at the Tower, I showed my condition to my mistress, but she barely acknowledged it. We had to stay at a tavern until my master found a house, and a day or two later, my mistress sent me to the wash-house to learn how to wash the English way. In the West Indies, we use cold water for washing, but in England, it's hot. I told my mistress I was worried that switching from hot water to cold would make my pain worse. The doctor had warned her long before I left the West Indies that I was sickly and that washing didn’t suit me. But Mrs. Wood wouldn’t let me leave the tub, so I had to do my best. I got worse and couldn’t stand to wash. I ended up sitting in front of the tub and often, due to pain and weakness, had to kneel or sit on the floor to finish my task. When I complained to my mistress, she just got angry as usual and said that washing in hot water couldn’t hurt anyone—that I was lazy and disrespectful and just wanted to avoid my work; she insisted that I would do it. I thought she was being really harsh on me, and I felt a surge of resentment. However, I kept quiet at that moment and went back to wash the child's clothes. But the English washerwomen working there, seeing how unwell I was, took pity on me and washed them for me.
After that, when we came up to live in Leigh Street, Mrs. Wood sorted out five bags of clothes which we had used at sea, and also such as had been worn since we came on shore, for me and the cook to wash. Elizabeth the cook told her, that she did not think that I was able to stand to the tub, and that she had better hire a woman. I also said myself, that I had come over to nurse the child, and that I was sorry I had come from Antigua, since mistress would work me so hard, without compassion for my rheumatism. Mr. and Mrs. Wood, when they heard this, rose up in a passion against me. They opened the door and bade me get out. But I was a stranger, and did not know one door in the street from another, and was unwilling to go away. They made a dreadful uproar, and from that day they constantly kept cursing and abusing me. I was obliged to wash, though I was very ill. Mrs. Wood, indeed once hired a washerwoman, but she was not well treated, and would come no more.
After that, when we moved to Leigh Street, Mrs. Wood sorted through five bags of clothes we had used at sea, along with those worn since we got on land, for me and the cook to wash. Elizabeth, the cook, told her that she didn’t think I could handle standing at the tub and suggested that they should hire a woman. I also mentioned that I had come to care for the child and that I regretted leaving Antigua since the mistress worked me so hard, showing no concern for my rheumatism. When Mr. and Mrs. Wood heard this, they got really angry with me. They opened the door and told me to leave. But I was a stranger and didn’t know one door in the street from another, so I was reluctant to go. They caused a huge scene, and from that day forward, they constantly cursed and insulted me. I had to wash, even though I felt very ill. Mrs. Wood did hire a washerwoman once, but she wasn’t treated well and didn’t come back.
My master quarrelled with me another time, about one of our great washings, his wife having stirred him up to do so. He said he would compel me to do the whole of the washing given out to me, or if I again refused, he would take a short course with me: he would either send me down to the brig in the river, to carry me back to Antigua, or he would turn me at once out of doors, and let me provide for myself. I said I would willingly go back, if he would let me purchase my own freedom. But this enraged him more than all the rest: he cursed and swore at me dreadfully, and said he would never sell my freedom—if I wished to be free, I was free in England, and I might go and try what freedom would do for me, and be d——d. My heart was very sore with this treatment, but I had to go on. I continued to do my work, and did all I could to give satisfaction, but all would not do.
My master got into another argument with me about one of our big laundry days, and his wife had stirred him up to do so. He said he would force me to do all the laundry I was assigned, or if I refused again, he would take drastic measures: either send me down to the brig in the river to be shipped back to Antigua, or he would kick me out right away and make me fend for myself. I told him I would gladly go back if he would let me buy my own freedom. But this made him even angrier than before: he cursed and yelled at me like crazy and said he would never sell my freedom—if I wanted to be free, I was free in England, and I could go find out what freedom would do for me, and good luck with that. My heart ached from this treatment, but I had to keep going. I kept doing my work and did everything I could to please him, but nothing seemed to help.
Shortly after, the cook left them, and then matters went on ten times worse. I always washed the child's clothes without being commanded to do it, and any thing else that was wanted in the family; though still I was very sick—very sick indeed. When the great washing came round, which was every two months, my mistress got together again a great many heavy things, such as bed-ticks, bed-coverlets, &c. for me to wash. I told her I was too ill to wash such heavy things that day.[20] She said, she supposed I thought myself a free woman, but I was not; and if I did not do it directly I should be instantly turned out of doors. I stood a long time before I could answer, for I did not know well what to do. I knew that I was free in England, but I did not know where to go, or how to get my living; and therefore, I did not like to leave the house. But Mr. Wood said he would send for a constable to thrust me out; and at last I took courage and resolved that I would not be longer thus treated, but would go and trust to Providence. This was the fourth time they had threatened turn me out, and, go where I might, I was determined now to take them at their word; though I thought it very hard, after I had lived with them for thirteen years, and worked for them like a horse, to be driven out in this way, like a beggar. My only fault was being sick, and therefore unable to please my mistress, who thought she never could get work enough out of her slaves; and I told them so: but they only abused me and drove me out. This took place from two to three months, I think, after we came to England.
Shortly after that, the cook left them, and things went downhill even more. I always washed the child's clothes without being told to, and did whatever else was needed around the house; although I was still very sick—extremely sick, in fact. When the big laundry day came around, which happened every two months, my mistress piled up a lot of heavy items, like bed ticks and bed covers, for me to wash. I told her I was too ill to handle such heavy stuff that day.[20] She said she thought I considered myself a free woman, but I wasn’t, and if I didn’t do it right away, I’d be kicked out. I stood there for a long time, unsure of what to say, because I didn’t know what to do. I was aware that I was free in England, but I didn’t know where to go or how to make a living, so I didn’t want to leave the house. But Mr. Wood said he would call a police officer to throw me out, and eventually, I gathered my courage and decided I wouldn’t tolerate this treatment any longer; I would leave and trust fate. This was the fourth time they threatened to throw me out, and no matter where I ended up, I was now determined to take them seriously; although I thought it was incredibly unfair, after living with them for thirteen years and working like a horse, to be turned out like a beggar. My only mistake was being sick, which made it hard for me to satisfy my mistress, who believed she could never get enough work from her slaves; I told them that, but they just abused me and kicked me out. This happened about two or three months after we arrived in England.
When I came away, I went to the man (one Mash) who used to black the shoes of the family, and asked his wife to get somebody to go with me to Hatton Garden to the Moravian Missionaries: these were the only persons I knew in England. The woman sent a young girl with me to the mission house, and I saw there a gentleman called Mr. Moore. I told him my whole story, and how my owners had treated me, and asked him to take in my trunk with what few clothes I had. The missionaries were very kind to me—they were sorry for my destitute situation, and gave me leave to bring my things to be placed under their care. They were very good people, and they told me to come to the church.
When I left, I went to the man named Mash who used to shine our family's shoes, and I asked his wife to find someone to go with me to Hatton Garden to see the Moravian Missionaries; they were the only people I knew in England. The woman sent a young girl with me to the mission house, where I met a gentleman named Mr. Moore. I shared my entire story with him, including how my owners had treated me, and asked if he could take my trunk with the few clothes I had. The missionaries were very kind—they sympathized with my desperate situation and allowed me to bring my things for safekeeping. They were truly good people, and they invited me to come to church.
When I went back to Mr. Wood's to get my trunk, I saw a lady, Mrs. Pell, who was on a visit to my mistress. When Mr. and Mrs. Wood heard me come in, they set this lady to stop me, finding that they had gone too far with me. Mrs. Pell came out to me, and said, "Are you really going to leave, Molly? Don't leave, but come into the country with me." I believe she said this because she thought Mrs. Wood would easily get me back again. I replied to her, "Ma'am, this is the fourth time my master and mistress have driven me out, or threatened to drive me—and I will give them no more occasion to bid me go. I was not willing to leave them, for I am a stranger in this country, but now I must go—I can stay no longer to be so used." Mrs. Pell then went up stairs to my mistress, and told that I would go, and that she could not stop me. Mrs. Wood was very much hurt and frightened when she found I was determined to go out that day. She said, "If she goes the people will rob her, and then turn her adrift." She did not say this to me, but she spoke it loud enough for me to hear; that it might induce me not to go, I suppose. Mr. Wood also asked me where I was going to. I told him where I had been, and that I should never have gone away had I not been driven out by my owners. He had given me a written paper some time before, which said that I had come with them to England by my own desire; and that was true. It said also that I left them of my own free will, because I was a free woman in England; and that[21] I was idle and would not do my work—which was not true. I gave this paper afterwards to a gentleman who inquired into my case.[13]
When I went back to Mr. Wood's to get my trunk, I saw a woman, Mrs. Pell, who was visiting my mistress. When Mr. and Mrs. Wood heard me come in, they had her stop me, realizing they had pushed me too far. Mrs. Pell came up to me and said, "Are you really going to leave, Molly? Don't go, come to the country with me." I think she said this because she thought Mrs. Wood could easily convince me to return. I replied, "Ma'am, this is the fourth time my master and mistress have forced me out or threatened to do so—and I won't give them another reason to send me away. I didn’t want to leave because I’m a stranger in this country, but now I must go—I can’t stay any longer to be treated this way." Mrs. Pell then went upstairs to my mistress and told her that I was leaving and that she couldn't stop me. Mrs. Wood was very upset and scared when she realized I was determined to leave that day. She said, "If she goes, people will rob her and then abandon her." She didn’t say this directly to me, but she spoke loudly enough for me to hear, probably hoping it would convince me not to go. Mr. Wood also asked where I was going. I told him where I had been and that I would never have left if I hadn’t been driven out by my owners. He had given me a written statement some time before, which said that I had come with them to England by my own choice; and that was true. It also stated that I left of my own free will because I was a free woman in England; and that I was idle and wouldn’t do my work—which wasn’t true. I later gave this paper to a gentleman who was looking into my case.[13]
I went into the kitchen and got my clothes out. The nurse and the servant girl were there, and I said to the man who was going to take out my trunk, "Stop, before you take up this trunk, and hear what I have to say before these people. I am going out of this house, as I was ordered; but I have done no wrong at all to my owners, neither here nor in the West Indies. I always worked very hard to please them, both by night and day; but there was no giving satisfaction, for my mistress could never be satisfied with reasonable service. I told my mistress I was sick, and yet she has ordered me out of doors. This is the fourth time; and now I am going out."
I went into the kitchen and got my clothes. The nurse and the maid were there, and I said to the guy who was about to take my trunk, "Wait a second before you pick this trunk up, and listen to what I have to say in front of these people. I'm leaving this house as I was told; but I haven't done anything wrong to my owners, either here or in the West Indies. I always worked really hard to please them, day and night; but nothing was ever enough, since my mistress could never be satisfied with reasonable effort. I told her I was sick, and still, she ordered me out. This is the fourth time, and now I'm leaving."
And so I came out, and went and carried my trunk to the Moravians. I then returned back to Mash the shoe-black's house, and begged his wife to take me in. I had a little West Indian money in my trunk; and they got it changed for me. This helped to support me for a little while. The man's wife was very kind to me. I was very sick, and she boiled nourishing things up for me. She also sent for a doctor to see me, and he sent me medicine, which did me good, though I was ill for a long time with the rheumatic pains. I lived a good many months with these poor people, and they nursed me, and did all that lay in their power to serve me. The man was well acquainted with my situation, as he used to go to and fro to Mr. Wood's house to clean shoes and knives; and he and his wife were sorry for me.
So I came out and took my trunk to the Moravians. Then, I went back to Mash the shoeshine guy's house and asked his wife to let me stay with them. I had a bit of West Indian money in my trunk, and they helped me get it exchanged. This helped me get by for a while. The man's wife was really kind to me. I was very sick, and she cooked nourishing food for me. She also called a doctor, who gave me medicine that helped, even though I was ill for a long time with rheumatic pain. I stayed with these kind people for several months, and they took care of me and did everything they could to help. The man knew about my situation since he went back and forth to Mr. Wood's house to clean shoes and knives, and both he and his wife felt sorry for me.
About this time, a woman of the name of Hill told me of the Anti-Slavery Society, and went with me to their office, to inquire if they could do any thing to get me my freedom, and send me back to the West Indies. The gentlemen of the Society took me to a lawyer, who examined very strictly into my case; but told me that the laws of England could do nothing to make me free in Antigua[14]. However they did all they could for me: they gave me a little money from time to time to keep me from want; and some of them went to Mr. Wood to try to persuade him to let me return a free woman to my husband; but though they offered him, as I have heard, a large sum for my freedom, he was sulky and obstinate, and would not consent to let me go free.
Around this time, a woman named Hill told me about the Anti-Slavery Society and took me to their office to see if they could help me gain my freedom and return to the West Indies. The gentlemen at the Society referred me to a lawyer, who thoroughly looked into my situation but informed me that the laws of England couldn’t grant me freedom in Antigua[14]. However, they did everything they could for me: they provided me with some money from time to time to prevent me from being in need; and some of them approached Mr. Wood to try to convince him to allow me to go back to my husband as a free woman. Unfortunately, although they reportedly offered him a large sum for my freedom, he was sullen and stubborn and refused to let me go free.
This was the first winter I spent in England, and I suffered much from the severe cold, and from the rheumatic pains, which still at times torment me. However, Providence was very good to me, and I got many friends—especially some Quaker ladies, who hearing of my case, came and sought me out, and gave me good warm clothing and money. Thus I had great cause to bless God in my affliction.
This was the first winter I spent in England, and I struggled a lot with the harsh cold and the rheumatic pains that still sometimes bother me. However, fate was very kind to me, and I made many friends—especially some Quaker women who, hearing about my situation, came to find me and provided me with warm clothing and money. So, I had plenty of reasons to be grateful to God during my hardships.
When I got better I was anxious to get some work to do, as I was unwilling to eat the bread of idleness. Mrs. Mash, who was a laundress, recommended me to a lady for a charwoman. She paid me very handsomely for what work I did, and I divided the money with Mrs. Mash; for though very poor, they gave me food when my own money was done, and never suffered me to want.
When I got better, I was eager to find some work, as I wasn't willing to live off idle hands. Mrs. Mash, who worked as a laundress, suggested me to a lady for a cleaning job. She paid me quite well for the work I did, and I shared the money with Mrs. Mash; even though they were very poor, they always provided me with food when my own money ran out and never let me go hungry.
In the spring, I got into service with a lady, who saw me at the house where I sometimes worked as a charwoman. This lady's name was Mrs. Forsyth. She had been in the West Indies, and was accustomed to Blacks, and liked them. I was with her six months, and went with her to Margate. She treated me well, and gave me a good character when she left London.[15]
In the spring, I started working for a woman who saw me at the place where I sometimes worked as a cleaner. Her name was Mrs. Forsyth. She had been to the West Indies, was comfortable around Black people, and liked them. I worked with her for six months and went with her to Margate. She treated me well and gave me a good reference when she left London.[15]
After Mrs. Forsyth went away, I was again out of place, and went to lodgings, for which I paid two shillings a week, and found coals and candle. After eleven weeks, the money I had saved in service was all gone, and I was forced to go back to the Anti-Slavery office to ask a supply, till I could get another situation. I did not like to go back—I did not like to be idle. I would rather work for my living than get it for nothing. They were very good to give me a supply, but I felt shame at being obliged to apply for relief whilst I had strength to work.
After Mrs. Forsyth left, I felt out of place again and found a room to rent, which cost me two shillings a week, and included coal and candles. After eleven weeks, I had spent all the money I saved from my job, and I had to go back to the Anti-Slavery office to ask for some support until I could find another job. I didn’t want to return—I hated being idle. I would much rather earn my living than get it for free. They were kind to give me support, but I felt ashamed to ask for help when I was still able to work.
At last I went into the service of Mr. and Mrs. Pringle, where I have been ever since, and am as comfortable as I can be while separated from my dear husband, and away from my own country and all old friends and connections. My dear mistress teaches me daily to read the word of God, and takes great pains to make me understand it. I enjoy the great privilege of being enabled to attend church three times on the Sunday; and I have met with many kind friends since I have been here, both clergymen and others. The Rev. Mr. Young, who lives in the next house, has shown me much kindness, and taken much pains to instruct me, particularly while my master and mistress were absent in Scotland. Nor must I forget, among my friends, the Rev. Mr. Mortimer, the good clergyman of the parish, under whose ministry I have now sat for upwards of twelve months. I trust in God I have profited by what I have heard from him. He never keeps back the truth, and I think he has been the means of opening my eyes and ears much better to understand the word of God. Mr. Mortimer tells me that he cannot open the eyes of my heart, but that I must pray to God to change my heart, and make me to know the truth, and the truth will make me free.
Finally, I joined the service of Mr. and Mrs. Pringle, where I've been ever since. I’m as comfortable as I can be while being away from my dear husband, my home country, and all my old friends and connections. My kind mistress teaches me to read the Bible every day and works hard to help me understand it. I have the great privilege of attending church three times on Sundays, and I’ve met many kind friends since I arrived, including some clergymen. The Rev. Mr. Young, who lives next door, has shown me a lot of kindness and has taken time to teach me, especially while my master and mistress were in Scotland. I must also mention my friend, the Rev. Mr. Mortimer, the good clergyman of the parish, under whose ministry I have been for over a year now. I trust in God that I have benefited from his teachings. He never hides the truth, and I believe he has helped me to see and hear better in order to understand the word of God. Mr. Mortimer tells me that he can’t open the eyes of my heart, but that I must pray to God to change my heart and help me know the truth, and the truth will set me free.
I still live in the hope that God will find a way to give me my liberty, and give me back to my husband. I endeavour to keep down my fretting, and to leave all to Him, for he knows what is good for me better than I know myself. Yet, I must confess, I find it a hard and heavy task to do so.
I still hope that God will find a way to grant me my freedom and reunite me with my husband. I try to manage my worries and leave everything in His hands because He knows what's best for me better than I do. Still, I have to admit, it's a tough and heavy challenge to do that.
I am often much vexed, and I feel great sorrow when I hear some people in this country say, that the slaves do not need better usage, and do not want to be free.[16] They believe the foreign people,[17] who deceive them, and say slaves are happy. I say, Not so. How can slaves be happy when they have the halter round their neck and the [23]whip upon their back? and are disgraced and thought no more of than beasts?—and are separated from their mothers, and husbands, and children, and sisters, just as cattle are sold and separated? Is it happiness for a driver in the field to take down his wife or sister or child, and strip them, and whip them in such a disgraceful manner?—women that have had children exposed in the open field to shame! There is no modesty or decency shown by the owner to his slaves; men, women, and children are exposed alike. Since I have been here I have often wondered how English people can go out into the West Indies and act in such a beastly manner. But when they go to the West Indies, they forget God and all feeling of shame, I think, since they can see and do such things. They tie up slaves like hogs—moor[18] them up like cattle, and they lick them, so as hogs, or cattle, or horses never were flogged;—and yet they come home and say, and make some good people believe, that slaves don't want to get out of slavery. But they put a cloak about the truth. It is not so. All slaves want to be free—to be free is very sweet. I will say the truth to English people who may read this history that my good friend, Miss S——, is now writing down for me. I have been a slave myself—I know what slaves feel—I can tell by myself what other slaves feel, and by what they have told me. The man that says slaves be quite happy in slavery—that they don't want to be free—that man is either ignorant or a lying person. I never heard a slave say so. I never heard a Buckra man say so, till I heard tell of it in England. Such people ought to be ashamed of themselves. They can't do without slaves, they say. What's the reason they can't do without slaves as well as in England? No slaves here—no whips—no stocks—no punishment, except for wicked people. They hire servants in England; and if they don't like them, they send them away: they can't lick them. Let them work ever so hard in England, they are far better off than slaves. If they get a bad master, they give warning and go hire to another. They have their liberty. That's just what we want. We don't mind hard work, if we had proper treatment, and proper wages like English servants, and proper time given in the week to keep us from breaking the Sabbath. But they won't give it: they will have work—work—work, night and day, sick or well, till we are quite done up; and we must not speak up nor look amiss, however much we be abused. And then when we are quite done up, who cares for us, more than for a lame horse? This is slavery. I tell it, to let English people know the truth; and I hope they will never leave off to pray God, and call loud to the great King of England, till all the poor blacks be given free, and slavery done up for evermore.
I often feel really frustrated and sad when I hear some people in this country say that slaves don’t need better treatment and don’t want to be free. They believe foreigners who mislead them into thinking slaves are happy. I say that’s not true. How can slaves be happy when they have a noose around their neck and a whip on their back? They are treated like animals and are separated from their mothers, husbands, children, and sisters just like cattle are sold and divided? Is it happiness for a driver in the field to take down his wife, sister, or child and strip them, then whip them in such a disgraceful way?—women who have had children exposed in the open field to shame! There is no modesty or decency shown by the owner to his slaves; men, women, and children are all treated the same. Since I’ve been here, I’ve often wondered how English people can go to the West Indies and act in such a brutal way. But when they get to the West Indies, they forget God and any sense of shame, I think, because they can see and do such things. They tie up slaves like hogs—moor them up like cattle, and they beat them in a way that hogs, cattle, or horses have never been whipped; and yet they come home and tell some good people that slaves don’t want to be free. But they’re hiding the truth. That’s not the case. All slaves want to be free—it’s a precious thing. I’m going to tell the truth to English people who might read this history that my good friend, Miss S——, is now writing down for me. I’ve been a slave myself—I know what slaves feel—I can tell from my own experience what others feel, and from what they’ve told me. The person who says slaves are completely happy in slavery—that they don’t want to be free—that person is either ignorant or lying. I’ve never heard a slave say that. I didn’t hear a Buckra man say it until I heard about it in England. Such people should be ashamed of themselves. They say they can't manage without slaves. Why can’t they do without slaves like they do in England? No slaves here—no whips—no stocks—no punishment except for bad people. They hire servants in England, and if they don’t like them, they send them away; they can’t beat them. Let them work as hard as they want in England, they are much better off than slaves. If they get a bad master, they give notice and go hire somewhere else. They have their freedom. That’s exactly what we want. We don’t mind hard work if we are treated right, given proper wages like English servants, and have enough time in the week to keep us from breaking the Sabbath. But they won’t allow it: they want us to work—work—work, day and night, sick or well, until we’re completely worn out; and we’re not allowed to speak up or even look unhappy, no matter how much we are mistreated. And when we’re completely worn out, who cares for us any more than a lame horse? This is slavery. I’m sharing this to let English people know the truth; and I hope they will never stop praying to God and calling on the great King of England until all the poor blacks are set free and slavery is ended forever.
SUPPLEMENT
TO THE
HISTORY OF MARY PRINCE.
BY THE EDITOR.
Leaving Mary's narrative, for the present, without comment to the reader's reflections, I proceed to state some circumstances connected with her case which have fallen more particularly under my own notice, and which I consider it incumbent now to lay fully before the public.
Leaving Mary's story for now, without any comments for the reader to ponder, I'll share some details related to her case that I've specifically observed and feel it's necessary to present to the public.
About the latter end of November, 1828, this poor woman found her way to the office of the Anti-Slavery Society in Aldermanbury, by the aid of a person who had become acquainted with her situation, and had advised her to apply there for advice and assistance. After some preliminary examination into the accuracy of the circumstances related by her, I went along with her to Mr. George Stephen, solicitor, and requested him to investigate and draw up a statement of her case, and have it submitted to counsel, in order to ascertain whether or not, under the circumstances, her freedom could be legally established on her return to Antigua. On this occasion, in Mr. Stephen's presence and mine, she expressed, in very strong terms, her anxiety to return thither if she could go as a free person, and, at the same time, her extreme apprehensions of the fate that would probably await her if she returned as a slave. Her words were, "I would rather go into my grave than go back a slave to Antigua, though I wish to go back to my husband very much—very much—very much! I am much afraid my owners would separate me from my husband, and use me very hard, or perhaps sell me for a field negro;—and slavery is too too bad. I would rather go into my grave!"
In late November 1828, this struggling woman made her way to the Anti-Slavery Society office in Aldermanbury, thanks to someone who learned about her situation and suggested she seek help there. After some preliminary checks into her story, I went with her to Mr. George Stephen, a solicitor, and asked him to look into her case and prepare a statement to present to counsel, to find out if her freedom could be legally recognized if she returned to Antigua. During this meeting, in front of Mr. Stephen and me, she expressed very strongly her desire to return if she could do so as a free person, and her deep fears about what would happen to her if she went back as a slave. She said, "I would rather go into my grave than go back a slave to Antigua, though I wish to go back to my husband very much—very much—very much! I am really afraid my owners would separate me from my husband, treat me very poorly, or maybe sell me as a field hand; slavery is just too terrible. I would rather go into my grave!"
The paper which Mr. Wood had given her before she left his house, was placed by her in Mr. Stephen's hands. It was expressed in the following terms:—
The paper that Mr. Wood had given her before she left his house was put into Mr. Stephen's hands. It was worded as follows:—
"I have already told Molly, and now give it her in writing, in order that there may be no misunderstanding on her part, that as I brought her from Antigua at her own request and entreaty, and that she is consequently now free, she is of course at liberty to take her baggage and go where she pleases. And, in consequence of her late conduct, she must do one of two things—either quit the house, or return to Antigua by the earliest opportunity, as she does not evince a disposition to make herself useful. As she is a stranger in London, I do not wish to turn[25] her out, or would do so, as two female servants are sufficient for my establishment. If after this she does remain, it will be only during her good behaviour: but on no consideration will I allow her wages or any other remuneration for her services.
"I’ve already told Molly, and now I’m putting it in writing to make sure there’s no misunderstanding on her part. I brought her from Antigua at her own request, and since she’s now free, she can take her belongings and go wherever she wants. However, due to her recent behavior, she has to do one of two things—either leave the house or return to Antigua at the first opportunity, as she hasn't shown any willingness to be helpful. She is a stranger in London, so I don’t want to throw her out, but I would if I had to, since two female servants are enough for my household. If she chooses to stay after this, it will only be as long as she behaves well: but under no circumstances will I pay her wages or any other compensation for her services."
"JOHN A. WOOD."
"JOHN A. WOOD."
"London, August 18, 1828."
"London, August 18, 1828."
This paper, though not devoid of inconsistencies, which will be apparent to any attentive reader, is craftily expressed; and was well devised to serve the purpose which the writer had obviously in view, namely, to frustrate any appeal which the friendless black woman might make to the sympathy of strangers, and thus prevent her from obtaining an asylum, if she left his house, from any respectable family. As she had no one to refer to for a character in this country except himself, he doubtless calculated securely on her being speedily driven back, as soon as the slender fund she had in her possession was expended, to throw herself unconditionally upon his tender mercies; and his disappointment in this expectation appears to have exasperated his feelings of resentment towards the poor woman, to a degree which few persons alive to the claims of common justice, not to speak of christianity or common humanity, could easily have anticipated. Such, at least, seems the only intelligible inference that can be drawn from his subsequent conduct.
This paper, while not without inconsistencies that any careful reader would notice, is cleverly written and clearly intended to achieve a specific goal. The writer's aim was to undermine any appeal the isolated black woman might make for sympathy from strangers, thereby preventing her from finding refuge with any respectable family if she chose to leave his house. Since she had no one to vouch for her character in this country except him, he likely felt confident that once her limited funds ran out, she would be forced to return and rely entirely on his mercies. His disappointment in not seeing this expectation fulfilled seems to have intensified his resentment toward the unfortunate woman to a degree that most people, aware of basic justice—let alone Christianity or common humanity—would not have easily predicted. This appears to be the only clear conclusion one can draw from his later actions.
The case having been submitted, by desire of the Anti-Slavery Committee, to the consideration of Dr. Lushington and Mr. Sergeant Stephen, it was found that there existed no legal means of compelling Mary's master to grant her manumission; and that if she returned to Antigua, she would inevitably fall again under his power, or that of his attorneys, as a slave. It was, however, resolved to try what could be effected for her by amicable negotiation; and with this view Mr. Ravenscroft, a solicitor, (Mr. Stephen's relative,) called upon Mr. Wood, in order to ascertain whether he would consent to Mary's manumission on any reasonable terms, and to refer, if required, the amount of compensation for her value to arbitration. Mr. Ravenscroft with some difficulty obtained one or two interviews, but found Mr. Wood so full of animosity against the woman, and so firmly bent against any arrangement having her freedom for its object, that the negotiation was soon broken off as hopeless. The angry slave-owner declared "that he would not move a finger about her in this country, or grant her manumission on any terms whatever; and that if she went back to the West Indies, she must take the consequences."
The case was submitted, at the request of the Anti-Slavery Committee, for consideration by Dr. Lushington and Mr. Sergeant Stephen. They determined that there were no legal avenues to force Mary's master to grant her freedom, and that if she returned to Antigua, she would inevitably fall back under his control, or that of his representatives, as a slave. However, they decided to see what could be achieved through friendly negotiation. To this end, Mr. Ravenscroft, a solicitor and relative of Mr. Stephen, met with Mr. Wood to find out if he would agree to Mary's release on reasonable terms and to refer the amount of compensation for her value to arbitration if necessary. Mr. Ravenscroft managed to secure a couple of meetings, but found Mr. Wood so filled with hostility towards Mary and so firmly opposed to any arrangement for her freedom that the negotiation quickly fell apart as futile. The angry slave owner insisted that "he would not lift a finger for her in this country or grant her freedom on any terms; and that if she returned to the West Indies, she would have to face the consequences."
This unreasonable conduct of Mr. Wood, induced the Anti-Slavery Committee, after several other abortive attempts to effect a compromise, to think of bringing the case under the notice of Parliament. The heads of Mary's statement were accordingly engrossed in a Petition, which Dr. Lushington offered to present, and to give notice at the same time of his intention to bring in a Bill to provide for the entire emancipation of all slaves brought to England with the owner's consent. But before this step was taken, Dr. Lushington again had recourse to negotiation with the master; and, partly through the friendly intervention of Mr. Manning, partly by personal conference, used every persuasion in his power to induce Mr. Wood to relent and let the bondwoman go free.[26] Seeing the matter thus seriously taken up, Mr. Wood became at length alarmed,—not relishing, it appears, the idea of having the case publicly discussed in the House of Commons; and to avert this result he submitted to temporize—assumed a demeanour of unwonted civility, and even hinted to Mr. Manning (as I was given to understand) that if he was not driven to utter hostility by the threatened exposure, he would probably meet our wishes "in his own time and way." Having gained time by these manœuvres, he adroitly endeavoured to cool the ardour of Mary's new friends, in her cause, by representing her as an abandoned and worthless woman, ungrateful towards him, and undeserving of sympathy from others; allegations which he supported by the ready affirmation of some of his West India friends, and by one or two plausible letters procured from Antigua. By these and like artifices he appears completely to have imposed on Mr. Manning, the respectable West India merchant whom Dr. Lushington had asked to negotiate with him; and he prevailed so far as to induce Dr. Lushington himself (actuated by the benevolent view of thereby best serving Mary's cause,) to abstain from any remarks upon his conduct when the petition was at last presented in Parliament. In this way he dextrously contrived to neutralize all our efforts, until the close of the Session of 1829; soon after which he embarked with his family for the West Indies.
Mr. Wood's unreasonable behavior led the Anti-Slavery Committee, after several failed attempts to reach a compromise, to consider bringing the case to Parliament's attention. The main points of Mary's statement were written up in a petition that Dr. Lushington offered to present, also giving notice of his intention to introduce a Bill for the complete emancipation of all slaves brought to England with their owner's consent. However, before taking this step, Dr. Lushington again tried to negotiate with the master; partly through the friendly help of Mr. Manning and partly through personal discussions, he did everything he could to persuade Mr. Wood to back down and let the enslaved woman go free. Seeing the seriousness of the situation, Mr. Wood finally became worried—he didn't like the idea of having the case discussed in the House of Commons; to avoid this, he decided to be diplomatic—acting unusually polite and even suggesting to Mr. Manning (as I was told) that if he wasn't pushed into outright confrontation by the threat of exposure, he would likely agree to our wishes "in his own time and way." After buying time with these tactics, he cleverly tried to dampen the enthusiasm of Mary's new supporters by portraying her as a fallen and worthless woman who was ungrateful to him and undeserving of sympathy from others; claims he backed up with the quick support of some friends from the West Indies and a couple of convincing letters from Antigua. Through these and similar strategies, he seemed to completely deceive Mr. Manning, the respectable West India merchant whom Dr. Lushington had asked to negotiate with him; he even managed to get Dr. Lushington himself (driven by the kind intention of best supporting Mary's cause) to refrain from commenting on his behavior when the petition was finally presented in Parliament. In this way, he skillfully managed to undermine all our efforts until the end of the Session of 1829; shortly after that, he left for the West Indies with his family.[26]
Every exertion for Mary's relief having thus failed; and being fully convinced from a twelvemonth's observation of her conduct, that she was really a well-disposed and respectable woman; I engaged her, in December 1829, as a domestic servant in my own family. In this capacity she has remained ever since; and I am thus enabled to speak of her conduct and character with a degree of confidence I could not have otherwise done. The importance of this circumstance will appear in the sequel.
Every effort to help Mary had failed, and after observing her behavior for a year, I was convinced that she was a genuinely good and respectable woman. So, in December 1829, I hired her as a domestic servant in my home. She has been with us ever since, which allows me to talk about her behavior and character with a level of confidence I couldn’t have had otherwise. The significance of this will become clear later.
From the time of Mr. Wood's departure to Antigua, in 1829, till June or July last, no farther effort was attempted for Mary's relief. Some faint hope was still cherished that this unconscionable man would at length relent, and "in his own time and way," grant the prayer of the exiled negro woman. After waiting, however, nearly twelve months longer, and seeing the poor woman's spirits daily sinking under the sickening influence of hope deferred, I resolved on a final attempt in her behalf, through the intervention of the Moravian Missionaries, and of the Governor of Antigua. At my request, Mr. Edward Moore, agent of the Moravian Brethren in London, wrote to the Rev. Joseph Newby, their Missionary in that island, empowering him to negotiate in his own name with Mr. Wood for Mary's manumission, and to procure his consent, if possible, upon terms of ample pecuniary compensation. At the same time the excellent and benevolent William Allen, of the Society of Friends, wrote to Sir Patrick Ross, the Governor of the Colony, with whom he was on terms of friendship, soliciting him to use his influence in persuading Mr. Wood to consent: and I confess I was sanguine enough to flatter myself that we should thus at length prevail. The result proved, however, that I had not yet fully appreciated the character of the man we had to deal with.
From the time Mr. Wood left for Antigua in 1829 until June or July of last year, no further efforts were made to help Mary. There was still some hope that this unreasonable man would eventually soften and "in his own time and way," grant the request of the exiled black woman. However, after waiting nearly twelve more months and watching the poor woman's spirits drop daily under the painful weight of unfulfilled hope, I decided to make one last attempt on her behalf, through the help of the Moravian Missionaries and the Governor of Antigua. At my request, Mr. Edward Moore, the agent for the Moravian Brethren in London, wrote to Rev. Joseph Newby, their Missionary on the island, giving him the authority to negotiate with Mr. Wood for Mary's freedom and to seek his consent, if possible, with generous monetary compensation. At the same time, the kind and charitable William Allen, from the Society of Friends, wrote to Sir Patrick Ross, the Governor of the Colony, with whom he had a friendship, asking him to use his influence to persuade Mr. Wood to agree. I must admit I was hopeful enough to think we would finally succeed. However, the outcome showed that I hadn't fully understood the character of the man we were dealing with.
Mr. Newby's answer arrived early in November last, mentioning that[27] he had done all in his power to accomplish our purpose, but in vain; and that if Mary's manumission could not be obtained without Mr. Wood's consent, he believed there was no prospect of its ever being effected.
Mr. Newby's response came early in November last, stating that[27] he had done everything he could to achieve our goal, but it was all in vain; and that if Mary’s freedom couldn’t be secured without Mr. Wood’s agreement, he thought there was no chance of it ever happening.
A few weeks afterwards I was informed by Mr. Allen, that he had received a letter from Sir Patrick Ross, stating that he also had used his best endeavours in the affair, but equally without effect. Sir Patrick at the same time inclosed a letter, addressed by Mr. Wood to his Secretary, Mr. Taylor, assigning his reasons for persisting in this extraordinary course. This letter requires our special attention. Its tenor is as follows:—
A few weeks later, Mr. Allen told me that he had received a letter from Sir Patrick Ross, saying that he had also done his best in the matter, but with no success. Sir Patrick included a letter addressed by Mr. Wood to his Secretary, Mr. Taylor, explaining his reasons for continuing with this unusual approach. This letter deserves our close attention. Its content is as follows:—
"My dear Sir,
"Dear Sir,"
"In reply to your note relative to the woman Molly, I beg you will have the kindness to oblige me by assuring his Excellency that I regret exceedingly my inability to comply with his request, which under other circumstances would afford me very great pleasure.
"In response to your note about the woman Molly, I kindly ask you to let his Excellency know that I deeply regret my inability to fulfill his request, which I would have found very enjoyable under different circumstances."
"There are many and powerful reasons for inducing me to refuse my sanction to her returning here in the way she seems to wish. It would be to reward the worst species of ingratitude, and subject myself to insult whenever she came in my way. Her moral character is very bad, as the police records will shew; and she would be a very troublesome character should she come here without any restraint. She is not a native of this country, and I know of no relation she has here. I induced her to take a husband, a short time before she left this, by providing a comfortable house in my yard for them, and prohibiting her going out after 10 to 12 o'clock (our bed-time) without special leave. This she considered the greatest, and indeed the only, grievance she ever complained of, and all my efforts could not prevent it. In hopes of inducing her to be steady to her husband, who was a free man, I gave him the house to occupy during our absence; but it appears the attachment was too loose to bind her, and he has taken another wife: so on that score I do her no injury.—In England she made her election, and quitted my family. This I had no right to object to; and I should have thought no more of it, but not satisfied to leave quietly, she gave every trouble and annoyance in her power, and endeavoured to injure the character of my family by the most vile and infamous falsehoods, which was embodied in a petition to the House of Commons, and would have been presented, had not my friends from this island, particularly the Hon. Mr. Byam and Dr. Coull, come forward, and disproved what she had asserted.
There are many strong reasons for me to refuse her request to come back here the way she wants. It would reward the worst kind of ingratitude and expose me to insult every time she crossed my path. Her moral character is quite bad, as the police records will show; she would be a very troublesome presence if she came here without any supervision. She isn't from this country, and I don't know of any family she has here. I encouraged her to marry a short time before she left by setting up a comfortable house in my yard for them and forbidding her to go out after 10 or 12 o'clock (our bedtime) without special permission. She considered that the greatest, and really the only, complaint she ever had, and nothing I did could change that. Hoping to encourage her to stay committed to her husband, who was a free man, I gave him the house to use while we were away; but it seems the bond wasn't strong enough to keep her, and he has taken another wife, so I don't harm her in that regard. In England, she made her choice and left my family. I had no right to object to that, and I would have thought no more of it, but instead of leaving quietly, she caused as much trouble and annoyance as she could and tried to damage my family's reputation with the most vile and infamous lies, which she put in a petition to the House of Commons. That petition would have been presented if my friends from this island, especially the Hon. Mr. Byam and Dr. Coull, hadn't stepped in and disproved her claims.
"It would be beyond the limits of an ordinary letter to detail her baseness, though I will do so should his Excellency wish it; but you may judge of her depravity by one circumstance, which came out before Mr. Justice Dyett, in a quarrel with another female.
"It would be beyond the scope of a regular letter to outline her wrongdoing, though I will do so if his Excellency requests it; but you can understand her moral decay from one incident that came to light before Mr. Justice Dyett during a dispute with another woman."
"Such a thing I could not have believed possible.[19]
Such a thing I could not have believed possible.[19]
"Losing her value as a slave in a pecuniary point of view I consider of no consequence; for it was our intention, had she conducted herself properly and returned with us, to have given her freedom. She has taken her freedom; and all I wish is, that she would enjoy it without meddling with me.
"Losing her value as a slave financially doesn’t matter to me; we intended to give her freedom if she had behaved well and returned with us. She has claimed her freedom, and all I want is for her to enjoy it without interfering in my life."
"Let me again repeat, if his Excellency wishes it, it will afford me great pleasure [28]to state such particulars of her, and which will be incontestably proved by numbers here, that I am sure will acquit me in his opinion of acting unkind or ungenerous towards her. I'll say nothing of the liability I should incur, under the Consolidated Slave Law, of dealing with a free person as a slave.
"Let me say again, if his Excellency wants it, I would be very happy [28]to provide details about her, which can definitely be proven by statistics here, and I'm sure this will clear me in his eyes of acting unkindly or unfairly towards her. I won't mention the risks I would take under the Consolidated Slave Law by treating a free person as a slave."
"My only excuse for entering so much into detail must be that of my anxious wish to stand justified in his Excellency's opinion.
"My only reason for going into so much detail is my deep desire to be justified in his Excellency's opinion."
"I am, my dear Sir,
Yours very truly,
John A. Wood.
"I am, my dear Sir,
Yours sincerely,
John A. Wood.
"20th Oct. 1830."
"October 20, 1830."
"Charles Taylor, Esq.
Charles Taylor, Attorney
&c. &c. &c.
etc. etc. etc.
"I forgot to mention that it was at her own special request that she accompanied me to England—and also that she had a considerable sum of money with her, which she had saved in my service. I knew of £36 to £40, at least, for I had some trouble to recover it from a white man, to whom she had lent it.
"I forgot to mention that it was her specific request to join me in England—and also that she brought a significant amount of money with her, which she had saved while working for me. I knew it was at least £36 to £40 because I had some difficulty getting it back from a white man to whom she had lent it."
"J. A. W."
"J. A. W."
Such is Mr. Wood's justification of his conduct in thus obstinately refusing manumission to the Negro-woman who had escaped from his "house of bondage."
Such is Mr. Wood's explanation for his stubborn refusal to free the Black woman who had escaped from his "house of bondage."
Let us now endeavour to estimate the validity of the excuses assigned, and the allegations advanced by him, for the information of Governor Sir Patrick Ross, in this deliberate statement of his case.
Let’s now try to assess the validity of the excuses he provided and the claims he made for the information of Governor Sir Patrick Ross in this careful statement of his case.
1. To allow the woman to return home free, would, he affirms "be to reward the worst species of ingratitude."
1. Letting the woman go home freely, he claims, "would be rewarding the worst kind of ingratitude."
He assumes, it seems, the sovereign power of pronouncing a virtual sentence of banishment, for the alleged crime of ingratitude. Is this then a power which any man ought to possess over his fellow-mortal? or which any good man would ever wish to exercise? And, besides, there is no evidence whatever, beyond Mr. Wood's mere assertion, that Mary Prince owed him or his family the slightest mark of gratitude. Her account of the treatment she received in his service, may be incorrect; but her simple statement is at least supported by minute and feasible details, and, unless rebutted by positive facts, will certainly command credence from impartial minds more readily than his angry accusation, which has something absurd and improbable in its very front. Moreover, is it not absurd to term the assertion of her natural rights by a slave,—even supposing her to have been kindly dealt with by her "owners," and treated in every respect the reverse of what Mary affirms to have been her treatment by Mr. Wood and his wife,—"the worst species of ingratitude?" This may be West Indian ethics, but it will scarcely be received as sound doctrine in Europe.
He seems to take on the power to issue a kind of virtual banishment for the supposed crime of ingratitude. Should any man really have that kind of power over another person? Is that something any decent person would want to use? Plus, there's no evidence at all, aside from Mr. Wood’s word, that Mary Prince owed him or his family any kind of gratitude. Her description of how she was treated in his service might be wrong, but her straightforward account is backed by detailed and plausible information and, unless challenged by concrete facts, will likely be believed by unbiased people more easily than his angry accusations, which seem absurd and unlikely from the start. Furthermore, isn’t it ridiculous to label a slave’s assertion of her natural rights—even if she had been treated well by her "owners," contrary to what Mary claims about her experiences with Mr. Wood and his wife—as the worst kind of ingratitude? This might be the way things are viewed in the West Indies, but it wouldn’t be accepted as reasonable thinking in Europe.
2. To permit her return would be "to subject himself to insult whenever she came in his way."
2. Letting her come back would mean "putting himself in a position to be insulted every time she crossed his path."
This is a most extraordinary assertion. Are the laws of Antigua then so favourable to the free blacks, or the colonial police so feebly administered, that there are no sufficient restraints to protect a rich colonist like Mr. Wood,—a man who counts among his familiar friends the Honourable Mr. Byam, and Mr. Taylor the Government Secretary,—from being insulted by a poor Negro-woman? It is preposterous.
This is an incredibly bizarre claim. Are the laws of Antigua really so favorable to free blacks, or is the colonial police force so poorly managed that there are no adequate measures to protect a wealthy colonist like Mr. Wood—a man who counts among his close friends the Honorable Mr. Byam and Mr. Taylor the Government Secretary—from being insulted by a poor Black woman? It's ridiculous.
3. Her moral character is so bad, that she would prove very troublesome should she come to the colony "without any restraint."[29]
3. Her moral character is so poor that she would create a lot of trouble if she arrived in the colony "without any restraint."[29]
"Any restraint?" Are there no restraints (supposing them necessary) short of absolute slavery to keep "troublesome characters" in order? But this, I suppose, is the argumentum ad gubernatorem—to frighten the governor. She is such a termagant, it seems, that if she once gets back to the colony free, she will not only make it too hot for poor Mr. Wood, but the police and courts of justice will scarce be a match for her! Sir Patrick Ross, no doubt, will take care how he intercedes farther for so formidable a virago! How can one treat such arguments seriously?
"Is there any restraint?" Are there no limits (assuming they're needed) short of complete slavery to keep "troublesome people" in line? But I guess this is the argumentum ad gubernatorem—to scare the governor. She's such a firebrand, it seems, that if she manages to return to the colony free, she won't just make things difficult for poor Mr. Wood, but the police and the courts probably won't stand a chance against her! Sir Patrick Ross, I'm sure, will think twice before he intervenes further for such a fearsome woman! How can anyone take such arguments seriously?
4. She is not a native of the colony, and he knows of no relation she has there.
4. She isn't from the colony, and he doesn't know of any relatives she has there.
True: But was it not her home (so far as a slave can have a home) for thirteen or fourteen years? Were not the connexions, friendships, and associations of her mature life formed there? Was it not there she hoped to spend her latter years in domestic tranquillity with her husband, free from the lash of the taskmaster? These considerations may appear light to Mr. Wood, but they are every thing to this poor woman.
True: But wasn’t it her home (as much as a slave can have a home) for thirteen or fourteen years? Didn’t she form her connections, friendships, and relationships during her adult life there? Wasn’t it where she hoped to spend her later years in peace with her husband, free from the whip of the overseer? These thoughts may seem trivial to Mr. Wood, but they mean everything to this poor woman.
5. He induced her, he says, to take a husband, a short time before she left Antigua, and gave them a comfortable house in his yard, &c. &c.
5. He says he persuaded her to marry just before she left Antigua and provided them with a cozy house in his yard, etc., etc.
This paragraph merits attention. He "induced her to take a husband?" If the fact were true, what brutality of mind and manners does it not indicate among these slave-holders? They refuse to legalize the marriages of their slaves, but induce them to form such temporary connexions as may suit the owner's conveniency, just as they would pair the lower animals; and this man has the effrontery to tell us so! Mary, however, tells a very different story, (see page 17;) and her assertion, independently of other proof, is at least as credible as Mr. Wood's. The reader will judge for himself as to the preponderance of internal evidence in the conflicting statements.
This paragraph deserves attention. He "induced her to marry?" If that's true, what kind of brutality of mind and manners does that reveal among these slave owners? They refuse to legalize the marriages of their slaves, but they "induce" them to create temporary relationships that benefit the owner's convenience, just like they would pair animals; and this man has the nerve to say so! Mary, however, tells a very different story (see page 17), and her claim, aside from other evidence, is at least as believable as Mr. Wood's. The reader can decide for themselves about the weight of the internal evidence in these conflicting statements.
6. He alleges that she was, before marriage, licentious, and even depraved in her conduct, and unfaithful to her husband afterwards.
6. He claims that she was promiscuous before marriage, behaved poorly, and was unfaithful to her husband afterward.
These are serious charges. But if true, or even partially true, how comes it that a person so correct in his family hours and arrangements as Mr. Wood professes to be, and who expresses so edifying a horror of licentiousness, could reconcile it to his conscience to keep in the bosom of his family so depraved, as well as so troublesome a character for at least thirteen years, and confide to her for long periods too the charge of his house and the care of his children—for such I shall shew to have been the facts? How can he account for not having rid himself with all speed, of so disreputable an inmate—he who values her loss so little "in a pecuniary point of view?" How can he account for having sold five other slaves in that period, and yet have retained this shocking woman—nay, even have refused to sell her, on more than one occasion, when offered her full value? It could not be from ignorance of her character, for the circumstance which he adduces as a proof of her shameless depravity, and which I have omitted on account of its indecency, occurred, it would appear, not less than ten years ago. Yet, notwithstanding her alleged ill qualities and habits of gross immorality, he has not only constantly refused to part with her; but after thirteen long years, brings her to England as an attendant on his wife and children, with the avowed intention of carrying her back along with his maiden daughter, a young[30] lady returning from school! Such are the extraordinary facts; and until Mr. Wood shall reconcile these singular inconsistencies between his actions and his allegations, he must not be surprised if we in England prefer giving credit to the former rather than the latter; although at present it appears somewhat difficult to say which side of the alternative is the more creditable to his own character.
These are serious accusations. But if they’re true, or even partially true, how is it that a person who claims to be so proper in his family life and arrangements, like Mr. Wood, and who shows such a righteous horror of immorality, could justify keeping such a corrupt and troublesome person within his family for at least thirteen years? How could he trust her with the management of his household and the care of his children—facts that I will demonstrate? How does he explain not having quickly rid himself of such a disgraceful resident—someone he claims to value so little "from a financial perspective?" How does he justify having sold five other slaves during that time while still keeping this shocking woman—indeed, even refusing to sell her more than once when offered her full price? It couldn’t be because he was unaware of her true nature, since the incident he cites as proof of her shameless depravity, which I omitted for being indecent, happened no less than ten years ago. Yet, despite her supposed bad qualities and grossly immoral behavior, he not only consistently refused to part with her but also, after thirteen long years, brings her to England as a helper for his wife and children, with the explicit intention of taking her back with his daughter, a young[30] lady returning from school! Such are the remarkable circumstances; and until Mr. Wood reconciles these strange inconsistencies between his actions and his claims, he shouldn’t be surprised if we in England prefer to trust the former over the latter; although right now it seems hard to say which side of the coin is more favorable to his own character.
7. Her husband, he says, has taken another wife; "so that on that score," he adds, "he does her no injury."
7. Her husband, he says, has taken another wife; "so on that front," he adds, "he's not hurting her."
Supposing this fact be true, (which I doubt, as I doubt every mere assertion from so questionable a quarter,) I shall take leave to put a question or two to Mr. Wood's conscience. Did he not write from England to his friend Mr. Darrel, soon after Mary left his house, directing him to turn her husband, Daniel James, off his premises, on account of her offence; telling him to inform James at the same time that his wife had taken up with another man, who had robbed her of all she had—a calumny as groundless as it was cruel? I further ask if the person who invented this story (whoever he may be,) was not likely enough to impose similar fabrications on the poor negro man's credulity, until he may have been induced to prove false to his marriage vows, and to "take another wife," as Mr. Wood coolly expresses it? But withal, I strongly doubt the fact of Daniel James' infidelity; for there is now before me a letter from himself to Mary, dated in April 1830, couched in strong terms of conjugal affection; expressing his anxiety for her speedy return, and stating that he had lately "received a grace" (a token of religious advancement) in the Moravian church, a circumstance altogether incredible if the man were living in open adultery, as Mr. Wood's assertion implies.
Assuming this is true (which I doubt, as I question everything from such a questionable source), I’d like to ask Mr. Wood a couple of questions. Did he not write from England to his friend Mr. Darrel shortly after Mary left his house, instructing him to kick her husband, Daniel James, off his property because of her wrongdoing? He told him to inform James that his wife had “taken up” with another man who robbed her of everything—a lie that is as unfounded as it is cruel. I also ask if the person who made up this story (whoever they are) was not likely to trick the poor black man into believing similar fabrications until he might have been led to betray his marriage vows and “take another wife,” as Mr. Wood casually puts it? However, I strongly doubt that Daniel James was unfaithful. I currently have a letter from him to Mary, dated April 1830, filled with strong expressions of love; he expresses his worry for her quick return and says that he recently “received a grace” (a sign of religious progress) in the Moravian church, which seems completely unbelievable if he were living in open adultery, as Mr. Wood claims.
8. Mary, he says, endeavoured to injure the character of his family by infamous falsehoods, which were embodied in a petition to the House of Commons, and would have been presented, had not his friends from Antigua, the Hon. Mr. Byam, and Dr. Coull, disproved her assertions.
8. Mary, he says, tried to damage his family's reputation with scandalous lies, which were included in a petition to the House of Commons, and would have been submitted if his friends from Antigua, the Hon. Mr. Byam, and Dr. Coull, hadn't proven her claims wrong.
I can say something on this point from my own knowledge. Mary's petition contained simply a brief statement of her case, and, among other things, mentioned the treatment she had received from Mr. and Mrs. Wood. Now the principal facts are corroborated by other evidence, and Mr. Wood must bring forward very different testimony from that of Dr. Coull before well-informed persons will give credit to his contradiction. The value of that person's evidence in such cases will be noticed presently. Of the Hon. Mr. Byam I know nothing, and shall only at present remark that it is not likely to redound greatly to his credit to appear in such company. Furthermore, Mary's petition was presented, as Mr. Wood ought to know; though it was not discussed, nor his conduct exposed as it ought to have been.
I can share something on this matter based on my own knowledge. Mary's petition was simply a brief outline of her situation and mentioned the treatment she received from Mr. and Mrs. Wood. Now, the main facts are supported by other evidence, and Mr. Wood will need to present very different testimony than Dr. Coull’s for informed people to believe his version of events. The importance of that person's evidence in such situations will be addressed soon. I don’t know anything about the Hon. Mr. Byam, but I’ll just say that it probably won’t do much for his reputation to be seen with this crowd. Additionally, Mary’s petition was submitted, as Mr. Wood should know; although it wasn’t discussed, nor was his behavior exposed as it should have been.
9. He speaks of the liability he should incur, under the Consolidated Slave Law, of dealing with a free person as a slave.
9. He talks about the risk he would face, under the Consolidated Slave Law, of treating a free person like a slave.
Is not this pretext hypocritical in the extreme? What liability could he possibly incur by voluntarily resigning the power, conferred on him by an iniquitous colonial law, of re-imposing the shackles of slavery on the bondwoman from whose limbs they had fallen when she touched the free soil of England?—There exists no liability from which he might not have been easily secured, or for which he would not have been fully compensated.
Isn’t this excuse incredibly hypocritical? What risk could he possibly face by willingly giving up the power, granted to him by an unjust colonial law, to re-enslave the woman who had been free the moment she stepped on English soil? There’s no risk he couldn’t have easily avoided, or for which he wouldn’t have been fully compensated.
He adds in a postscript that Mary had a considerable sum of money with her,—from £36 to £40 at least, which she had saved in his service. The fact is, that she had at one time 113 dollars in cash; but only a very small portion of that sum appears to have been brought by her to England, the rest having been partly advanced, as she states, to assist her husband, and partly lost by being lodged in unfaithful custody.
He adds in a postscript that Mary had a decent amount of money with her—between £36 and £40 at least, which she had saved while working for him. The truth is, she once had 113 dollars in cash; however, only a small part of that amount seems to have been brought with her to England. She mentioned that the rest was partly given to help her husband and partly lost due to being kept by someone untrustworthy.
Finally, Mr. Wood repeats twice that it will afford him great pleasure to state for the governor's satisfaction, if required, such particulars of "the woman Molly," upon incontestable evidence, as he is sure will acquit him in his Excellency's opinion "of acting unkind or ungenerous towards her."
Finally, Mr. Wood mentions twice that he would be very pleased to provide the governor with any details about "the woman Molly," based on undeniable evidence, that he believes will clear him in the governor's eyes of being unkind or unfair to her.
This is well: and I now call upon Mr. Wood to redeem his pledge;—to bring forward facts and proofs fully to elucidate the subject;—to reconcile, if he can, the extraordinary discrepancies which I have pointed out between his assertions and the actual facts, and especially between his account of Mary Prince's character and his own conduct in regard to her. He has now to produce such a statement as will acquit him not only in the opinion of Sir Patrick Ross, but of the British public. And in this position he has spontaneously placed himself, in attempting to destroy, by his deliberate criminatory letter, the poor woman's fair fame and reputation,—an attempt but for which the present publication would probably never have appeared.
This is good: and I now ask Mr. Wood to fulfill his promise—to bring forward facts and evidence to clarify the situation—to resolve, if he can, the shocking inconsistencies I've pointed out between his claims and the actual facts, especially between his portrayal of Mary Prince's character and his own behavior toward her. He now has to present a statement that will clear him not only in the eyes of Sir Patrick Ross but also in the eyes of the British public. He has put himself in this position by trying to ruin the poor woman's good name and reputation with his intentional accusing letter—an effort without which this publication probably would never have happened.
Here perhaps we might safely leave the case to the judgment of the public; but as this negro woman's character, not the less valuable to her because her condition is so humble, has been so unscrupulously blackened by her late master, a party so much interested and inclined to place her in the worst point of view,—it is incumbent on me, as her advocate with the public, to state such additional testimony in her behalf as I can fairly and conscientiously adduce.
Here, we might be able to trust the public to make their own judgment; however, since this black woman's character—valuable despite her humble circumstances—has been unfairly tarnished by her former master, who has a strong interest in portraying her negatively, it is my responsibility, as her supporter, to present any additional evidence in her favor that I can reasonably and honestly provide.
My first evidence is Mr. Joseph Phillips, of Antigua. Having submitted to his inspection Mr. Wood's letter and Mary Prince's narrative, and requested his candid and deliberate sentiments in regard to the actual facts of the case, I have been favoured with the following letter from him on the subject:—
My first piece of evidence is Mr. Joseph Phillips from Antigua. After showing him Mr. Wood's letter and Mary Prince's story, and asking for his honest and thoughtful opinions about the actual facts of the case, I received the following letter from him on the matter:—
"London, January 18, 1831.
London, January 18, 1831.
"Dear Sir,
"Dear Sir,"
"In giving you my opinion of Mary Prince's narrative, and of Mr. Wood's letter respecting her, addressed to Mr. Taylor, I shall first mention my opportunities of forming a proper estimate of the conduct and character of both parties.
"In sharing my thoughts on Mary Prince's story and Mr. Wood's letter about her, which was sent to Mr. Taylor, I will first talk about how I’ve been able to properly assess the actions and character of both individuals."
"I have known Mr. Wood since his first arrival in Antigua in 1803. He was then a poor young man, who had been brought up as a ship carpenter in Bermuda. He was afterwards raised to be a clerk in the Commissariat department, and realised sufficient capital to commence business as a merchant. This last profession he has followed successfully for a good many years, and is understood to have accumulated very considerable wealth. After he entered into trade, I had constant intercourse with him in the way of business; and in 1824 and 1825, I was regularly employed on his premises as his clerk; consequently, I had opportunities of seeing a good deal of his character both as a merchant, and as a master of slaves. The former topic I pass over as irrelevant to the present subject: in reference to the latter, I shall merely observe that he was not, in regard to ordinary [32]matters, more severe than the ordinary run of slave owners; but, if seriously offended, he was not of a disposition to be easily appeased, and would spare no cost or sacrifice to gratify his vindictive feelings. As regards the exaction of work from domestic slaves, his wife was probably more severe than himself—it was almost impossible for the slaves ever to give her entire satisfaction.
"I have known Mr. Wood since he first arrived in Antigua in 1803. Back then, he was a poor young man who had been raised as a ship carpenter in Bermuda. He later became a clerk in the Commissariat department and managed to save enough money to start his own business as a merchant. He has been successful in this profession for many years and is believed to have accumulated substantial wealth. After he began trading, I frequently interacted with him for business; in 1824 and 1825, I worked regularly on his premises as his clerk. This gave me the chance to see quite a bit of his character, both as a merchant and as a slave owner. I'll skip the former since it's not relevant to the current topic. Regarding the latter, I will note that he was not, in general matters, any harsher than the average slave owner. However, if he felt seriously offended, he was not easily appeased and would go to great lengths to satisfy his desire for revenge. When it came to demanding work from domestic slaves, his wife was probably stricter than he was—it was nearly impossible for the slaves to ever fully satisfy her."
"Of their slave Molly (or Mary) I know less than of Mr. and Mrs. Wood; but I saw and heard enough of her, both while I was constantly employed on Mr. Wood's premises, and while I was there occasionally on business, to be quite certain that she was viewed by her owners as their most respectable and trustworthy female slave. It is within my personal knowledge that she had usually the charge of the house in their absence, was entrusted with the keys, &c.; and was always considered by the neighbours and visitors as their confidential household servant, and as a person in whose integrity they placed unlimited confidence,—although when Mrs. Wood was at home, she was no doubt kept pretty closely at washing and other hard work. A decided proof of the estimation in which she was held by her owners exists in the fact that Mr. Wood uniformly refused to part with her, whereas he sold five other slaves while she was with them. Indeed, she always appeared to me to be a slave of superior intelligence and respectability; and I always understood such to be her general character in the place.
"About their slave Molly (or Mary), I know less than I do about Mr. and Mrs. Wood; however, I saw and heard enough of her while I worked on Mr. Wood's property and during my occasional visits for business to be sure that her owners viewed her as their most respectable and trustworthy female slave. I can personally attest that she usually managed the house when they were away, was given the keys, etc.; and she was always seen by neighbors and visitors as their reliable household servant, someone they trusted completely—although when Mrs. Wood was home, she was likely kept busy with laundry and other hard work. A clear indication of how much her owners valued her is the fact that Mr. Wood consistently refused to sell her, while he sold five other slaves during her time with them. In fact, she always struck me as a slave of high intelligence and respectability; I understood that to be her general reputation in the area."
"As to what Mr. Wood alleges about her being frequently before the police, &c. I can only say I never heard of the circumstance before; and as I lived for twenty years in the same small town, and in the vicinity of their residence, I think I could scarcely have failed to become acquainted with it, had such been the fact. She might, however, have been occasionally before the magistrate in consequence of little disputes among the slaves, without any serious imputation on her general respectability. She says she was twice summoned to appear as a witness on such occasions; and that she was once sent by her mistress to be confined in the Cage, and was afterwards flogged by her desire. This cruel practice is very common in Antigua; and, in my opinion, is but little creditable to the slave owners and magistrates by whom such arbitrary punishments are inflicted, frequently for very trifling faults. Mr. James Scotland is the only magistrate in the colony who invariably refuses to sanction this reprehensible practice.
As for what Mr. Wood claims about her frequently being in front of the police, I can only say I never heard about that before; and since I lived in the same small town for twenty years and near their home, I doubt I would have missed it if it were true. However, she might have been before the magistrate occasionally due to minor disputes among the slaves, without any serious damage to her overall respectability. She says she was summoned twice to appear as a witness on such occasions, and that once her mistress sent her to be locked up in the Cage and later had her whipped at her request. This cruel practice is really common in Antigua, and in my view, it reflects poorly on the slave owners and magistrates who impose such arbitrary punishments, often for very small offenses. Mr. James Scotland is the only magistrate in the colony who consistently refuses to endorse this unacceptable practice.
"Of the immoral conduct ascribed to Molly by Mr. Wood, I can say nothing further than this—that I have heard she had at a former period (previous to her marriage) a connexion with a white person, a Capt. ——, which I have no doubt was broken off when she became seriously impressed with religion. But, at any rate, such connexions are so common, I might almost say universal, in our slave colonies, that except by the missionaries and a few serious persons, they are considered, if faults at all, so very venial as scarcely to deserve the name of immorality. Mr. Wood knows this colonial estimate of such connexions as well as I do; and, however false such an estimate must be allowed to be, especially When applied to their own conduct by persons of education, pretending to adhere to the pure Christian rule of morals,—yet when he ascribes to a negro slave, to whom legal marriage was denied, such great criminality for laxity of this sort, and professes to be so exceedingly shocked and amazed at the tale he himself relates, he must, I am confident, have had a farther object in view than the information of Mr. Taylor or Sir Patrick Ross. He must, it is evident, have been aware that his letter would be sent to Mr. Allen, and accordingly adapted it, as more important documents from the colonies are often adapted, for effect in England. The tale of the slave Molly's immoralities, be assured, was not intended for Antigua so much as for Stoke Newington, and Peckham, and Aldermanbury.
"Regarding the immoral behavior attributed to Molly by Mr. Wood, I can only say this: I've heard that at some point before her marriage, she had a relationship with a white person, a Captain ——, which I believe ended when she became serious about her faith. Regardless, such relationships are so common, I might even say universal, in our slave colonies that, except by missionaries and a few earnest individuals, they are viewed, if at all considered faults, as so minor that they hardly deserve the label of immorality. Mr. Wood understands this colonial perspective on such relationships just as well as I do; and although this perspective is clearly misguided, especially when applied to the behavior of educated individuals who claim to follow the true Christian moral code – when he assigns such significant blame to a black slave, who was denied the right to marry legally, for this kind of behavior, and pretends to be so shocked and appalled by the story he tells, I am certain he must have had a different aim than simply informing Mr. Taylor or Sir Patrick Ross. It’s clear he knew his letter would be sent to Mr. Allen, and thus he tailored it, similar to how other important documents from the colonies are often shaped, for effect in England. The story of Molly's immoral actions, make no mistake, was not meant for Antigua as much as it was for Stoke Newington, Peckham, and Aldermanbury."
"In regard to Mary's narrative generally, although I cannot speak to the accuracy of the details, except in a few recent particulars, I can with safety declare that I see no reason to question the truth of a single fact stated by her, or even to suspect her in any instance of intentional exaggeration. It bears in my judgment [33]the genuine stamp of truth and nature. Such is my unhesitating opinion, after a residence of twenty-seven years in the West Indies.
"In terms of Mary's story overall, while I can’t confirm the accuracy of the details—except for a few recent points—I can confidently say that I see no reason to doubt any fact she presented, nor do I suspect her of intentionally exaggerating. In my opinion, it has a genuine touch of truth and authenticity. This is my firm belief after living in the West Indies for twenty-seven years. [33]"
"I remain, &c.
"I remain, etc."
"Joseph Phillips."
"Joseph Phillips."
To T. Pringle, Esq.
To T. Pringle, Esq.
"P.S. As Mr. Wood refers to the evidence of Dr. T. Coull in opposition to Mary's assertions, it may be proper to enable you justly to estimate the worth of that person's evidence in cases connected with the condition and treatment of slaves. You are aware that in 1829, Mr. M'Queen of Glasgow, in noticing a Report of the "Ladies' Society of Birmingham for the relief of British Negro Slaves," asserted with his characteristic audacity, that the statement which it contained respecting distressed and deserted slaves in Antigua was "an abominable falsehood." Not contented with this, and with insinuating that I, as agent of the society in the distribution of their charity in Antigua, had fraudulently duped them out of their money by a fabricated tale of distress, Mr. M'Queen proceeded to libel me in the most opprobrious terms, as "a man of the most worthless and abandoned character."[20] Now I know from good authority that it was upon Dr. Coull's information that Mr. M'Queen founded this impudent contradiction of notorious facts, and this audacious libel of my personal character. From this single circumstance you may judge of the value of his evidence in the case of Mary Prince. I can furnish further information respecting Dr. Coull's colonial proceedings, both private and judicial, should circumstances require it."
"P.S. As Mr. Wood mentions Dr. T. Coull's evidence against Mary's claims, it's important to help you accurately assess the value of that person's testimony regarding the condition and treatment of slaves. You know that in 1829, Mr. M'Queen from Glasgow, while commenting on a Report from the 'Ladies' Society of Birmingham for the Relief of British Negro Slaves,' boldly claimed that the statement about distressed and abandoned slaves in Antigua was 'an abominable falsehood.' Not satisfied with that and suggesting that I, as the society's agent handling their charity distribution in Antigua, had deceived them out of their money with a made-up story of distress, Mr. M'Queen went on to defame me in the most disgraceful terms, calling me 'a man of the most worthless and abandoned character.' Now I know from reliable sources that it was based on Dr. Coull's information that Mr. M'Queen made this shameless denial of well-known facts and this bold attack on my character. From this alone, you can gauge the reliability of his testimony in the case of Mary Prince. I can provide more information regarding Dr. Coull's actions in the colonies, both private and judicial, if necessary."
"J. P."
"J.P."
I leave the preceding letter to be candidly weighed by the reader in opposition to the inculpatory allegations of Mr. Wood—merely remarking that Mr. Wood will find it somewhat difficult to impugn the evidence of Mr. Phillips, whose "upright," "unimpeached," and "unexceptionable" character, he has himself vouched for in unqualified terms, by affixing his signature to the testimonial published in the Weekly Register of Antigua in 1825. (See Note below.)
I leave the previous letter for the reader to honestly consider against the accusations made by Mr. Wood—just noting that Mr. Wood will find it a bit challenging to challenge the evidence from Mr. Phillips, whose "honest," "unquestioned," and "exceptional" character he himself vouched for in clear terms by signing the testimonial published in the Weekly Register of Antigua in 1825. (See Note below.)
The next testimony in Mary's behalf is that of Mrs. Forsyth, a lady in whose service she spent the summer of 1829.—(See page 21.) This lady, on leaving London to join her husband, voluntarily presented Mary with a certificate, which, though it relates only to a recent and short period of her history, is a strong corroboration of the habitual respectability of her character. It is in the following terms:—
The next testimony in support of Mary is from Mrs. Forsyth, a woman for whom she worked during the summer of 1829.—(See page 21.) As she was leaving London to join her husband, this woman willingly gave Mary a certificate, which, although it only covers a recent and brief time in her life, strongly supports the consistent respectability of her character. It reads as follows:—
"Mrs. Forsyth states, that the bearer of this paper (Mary James,) has been with her for the last six months; that she has found her an excellent character, being honest, industrious, and sober; and that she parts with her on no other account than this—that being obliged to travel with her husband, who has lately come from abroad in bad health, she has no farther need of a servant. Any person Wishing to engage her, can have her character in full from Miss Robson, 4, Keppel Street, Russel Square, whom Mrs. Forsyth has requested to furnish particulars to any one desiring them.
"Mrs. Forsyth states that the person holding this paper (Mary James) has been with her for the past six months. She has found Mary to have excellent qualities: she is honest, hardworking, and responsible. Mrs. Forsyth is letting her go solely because she needs to travel with her husband, who recently returned from abroad in poor health, and she no longer requires a servant. Anyone wanting to hire her can get a full reference from Miss Robson at 4 Keppel Street, Russell Square, which Mrs. Forsyth has asked to provide details to anyone interested."
"4, Keppel Street, 28th Sept. 1829."
"4, Keppel Street, September 28, 1829."
In the last place, I add my own testimony in behalf of this negro woman. Independently of the scrutiny, which, as Secretary of the Anti-Slavery Society, I made into her case when she first applied for assistance, at 18, Aldermanbury, and the watchful eye I kept upon her conduct for the ensuing twelvemonths, while she was the occasional pensioner of the Society, I have now had the opportunity of closely observing her conduct for fourteen months, in the situation of a domestic[35] servant in my own family; and the following is the deliberate opinion of Mary's character, formed not only by myself, but also by my wife and sister-in-law, after this ample period of observation. We have found her perfectly honest and trustworthy in all respects; so that we have no hesitation in leaving every thing in the house at her disposal. She had the entire charge of the house during our absence in Scotland for three months last autumn, and conducted herself in that charge with the utmost discretion and fidelity. She is not, it is true, a very expert housemaid, nor capable of much hard work, (for her constitution appears to be a good deal broken,) but she is careful, industrious, and anxious to do her duty and to give satisfaction. She is capable of strong attachments, and feels deep, though unobtrusive, gratitude for real kindness shown her. She possesses considerable natural sense, and has much quickness of observation and discrimination of character. She is remarkable for decency and propriety of conduct—and her delicacy, even in trifling minutiæ, has been a trait of special remark by the females of my family. This trait, which is obviously quite unaffected, would be a most inexplicable anomaly, if her former habits had been so indecent and depraved as Mr. Wood alleges. Her chief faults, so far as we have discovered them, are, a somewhat violent and hasty temper, and a considerable share of natural pride and self-importance; but these defects have been but rarely and transiently manifested, and have scarcely occasioned an hour's uneasiness at any time in our household. Her religious knowledge, notwithstanding the pious care of her Moravian instructors in Antigua, is still but very limited, and her views of christianity indistinct; but her profession, whatever it may have of imperfection, I am convinced, has nothing of insincerity. In short, we consider her on the whole as respectable and well-behaved a person in her station, as any domestic, white or black, (and we have had ample experience of both colours,) that we have ever had in our service.
In conclusion, I want to share my own perspective on this black woman. After looking into her situation as Secretary of the Anti-Slavery Society when she first sought help at 18 Aldermanbury, and keeping a close watch on her behavior for the following year while she was occasionally supported by the Society, I have now had the chance to observe her closely for fourteen months as a domestic servant in my own home. The following is the considered opinion of Mary's character, formed not just by me but also by my wife and sister-in-law after this extensive period of observation. We have found her to be completely honest and trustworthy in all respects, so we have no hesitation in letting her manage everything in the house. She was entirely responsible for the household during our three-month absence in Scotland last autumn and handled that responsibility with the utmost care and loyalty. Admittedly, she's not the most skilled housemaid and isn't capable of heavy labor (as her health seems quite fragile), but she is careful, hardworking, and eager to do her job well and please us. She is capable of strong attachments and feels genuine, if subtle, gratitude for any kindness shown to her. She has substantial common sense and a sharp ability to observe and understand character. She stands out for her decency and propriety of conduct, and her delicacy, even in minor details, has been particularly noted by the women in my family. This quality, which is clearly natural, would be completely contradictory if her previous behavior had been as immoral and corrupt as Mr. Wood claims. Her main faults, as we've discovered, are a somewhat quick and fiery temper and a significant degree of natural pride and self-importance; however, these flaws have rarely shown themselves and have caused us little trouble in our home. Although her religious knowledge is still quite limited despite the care of her Moravian teachers in Antigua, and her understanding of Christianity is vague, I genuinely believe that whatever imperfections she may have, there is no insincerity in her beliefs. In summary, we find her to be as respectable and well-behaved as any domestic servant, whether white or black (and we have plenty of experience with both), that we have ever had working for us.
But after all, Mary's character, important though its exculpation be to her, is not really the point of chief practical interest in this case. Suppose all Mr. Wood's defamatory allegations to be true—suppose him to be able to rake up against her out of the records of the Antigua police, or from the veracious testimony of his brother colonists, twenty stories as bad or worse than what he insinuates—suppose the whole of her own statement to be false, and even the whole of her conduct since she came under our observation here to be a tissue of hypocrisy;—suppose all this—and leave the negro woman as black in character as in complexion,[21]—yet it would affect not the main facts—which are these.—1. Mr. Wood, not daring in England to punish this woman arbitrarily, as he would have done in the West Indies, drove her out of his house, or [36]left her, at least, only the alternative of returning instantly to Antigua, with the certainty of severe treatment there, or submitting in silence to what she considered intolerable usage in his household. 2. He has since obstinately persisted in refusing her manumission, to enable her to return home in security, though repeatedly offered more than ample compensation for her value as a slave; and this on various frivolous pretexts, but really, and indeed not unavowedly, in order to punish her for leaving his service in England, though he himself had professed to give her that option. These unquestionable facts speak volumes.[22]
But still, Mary's character, important as her defense may be to her, isn't the main issue in this case. Imagine if all of Mr. Wood's defamatory claims were true—imagine he could dig up twenty stories from the records of the Antigua police, or from the reliable accounts of his fellow colonists, that were just as bad or worse than what he suggests—imagine her entire statement being false, and her behavior since we started observing her here being nothing but a web of lies;—imagine all this—and still consider the Black woman as flawed in character as she is in appearance,[21]—yet none of it would change the main facts, which are these.—1. Mr. Wood, not daring to punish this woman arbitrarily in England as he would have in the West Indies, forced her out of his house, or at least left her with no choice but to return immediately to Antigua, knowing she would face harsh treatment there, or to silently endure what she saw as unbearable treatment in his household. 2. He has stubbornly refused to grant her freedom, enabling her to return home safely, despite being offered more than sufficient compensation for her worth as a slave; and this for various trivial reasons, but really, and not even secretly, to punish her for leaving his service in England, even though he had claimed to give her that choice. These undeniable facts say a lot.[22]
The case affords a most instructive illustration of the true spirit of the slave system, and of the pretensions of the slave-holders to assert, not merely their claims to a "vested right" in the labour of their bondmen, but to an indefeasible property in them as their "absolute chattels." It furnishes a striking practical comment on the assertions of the West Indians that self-interest is a sufficient check to the indulgence of vindictive feelings in the master; for here is a case where a man (a respectable and benevolent man as his friends aver,) prefers losing entirely the full price of the slave, for the mere satisfaction of preventing a poor black woman from returning home to her husband! If the pleasure of thwarting the benevolent wishes of the Anti-Slavery Society in behalf of the deserted negro, be an additional motive with Mr. Wood, it will not much mend his wretched plea.
The case provides a very insightful example of the true nature of the slave system and the claims of slaveholders to assert not just their "vested right" to the labor of their enslaved individuals, but to an undeniable ownership of them as their "absolute possessions." It offers a striking real-world commentary on the claims made by West Indians that self-interest is enough to prevent the indulgence of vindictive feelings in the master; here we have a situation where a man (a respectable and benevolent man, according to his friends) chooses to lose the full price of a slave just to find satisfaction in stopping a poor black woman from going back to her husband! If the desire to thwart the compassionate intentions of the Anti-Slavery Society on behalf of the abandoned black woman is an extra motive for Mr. Wood, it doesn't improve his miserable argument.
I may here add a few words respecting the earlier portion of Mary Prince's narrative. The facts there stated must necessarily rest entirely,—since we have no collateral evidence,—upon their intrinsic claims to probability, and upon the reliance the reader may feel disposed, after perusing the foregoing pages, to place on her veracity. To my judgment, the internal evidence of the truth of her narrative appears remarkably strong. The circumstances are related in a tone of natural sincerity, and are accompanied in almost every case with characteristic and minute details, which must, I conceive, carry with them full conviction to every candid mind that this negro woman has actually seen, felt, and suffered all that she so impressively describes; and that the picture she has given of West Indian slavery is not less true than it is revolting.
I’d like to add a few words about the earlier part of Mary Prince's story. The facts presented there must stand solely on their own merit—since we have no additional evidence—based on how credible they seem and the trust the reader might place in her honesty after reading the previous pages. In my opinion, the evidence supporting the truth of her narrative is remarkably strong. The events are described with a natural sincerity and most are filled with specific and detailed accounts that, I believe, will convince any open-minded person that this black woman has truly experienced everything she vividly portrays; and that her depiction of West Indian slavery is just as truthful as it is horrifying.
But there may be some persons into whose hands this tract may fall, so imperfectly acquainted with the real character of Negro Slavery, as to be shocked into partial, if not absolute incredulity, by the acts of inhuman oppression and brutality related of Capt. I—— and his wife, and of Mr. D——, the salt manufacturer of Turk's Island. Here, at least, such persons may be disposed to think, there surely must be some exaggeration; the facts are too shocking to be credible. The facts are indeed shocking, but unhappily not the less credible on that account. Slavery is a curse to the oppressor scarcely less than to the oppressed: its natural tendency is to brutalize both. After a residence myself of six years in a slave colony, I am inclined to doubt whether, as regards its demoralizing influence, the master is not even a greater object of compassion than his bondman. Let those who are disposed to doubt the atrocities related in this narrative, on the testimony of a sufferer, examine the details of many cases of similar barbarity that have lately come before the public, on unquestionable evidence. Passing over the reports of the Fiscal of Berbice,[23] and the Mauritius horrors recently unveiled,[24] let them consider the case of Mr. and Mrs. Moss, of the Bahamas, and their slave Kate, so justly denounced by the Secretary for the Colonies;[25]—the cases of Eleanor Mead,[26]—of Henry Williams,[27]—and [38]of the Rev. Mr. Bridges and Kitty Hylton,[28] in Jamaica. These cases alone might suffice to demonstrate the inevitable tendency of slavery as it exists in our colonies, to brutalize the master to a truly frightful degree—a degree which would often cast into the shade even the atrocities related in the narrative of Mary Prince; and which are sufficient to prove, independently of all other evidence, that there is nothing in the revolting character of the facts to affect their credibility; but that on the contrary, similar deeds are at this very time of frequent occurrence in almost every one of our slave colonies. The system of coercive labour may vary in different places; it may be more destructive to human life in the cane culture of Mauritius and Jamaica, than in the predial and domestic bondage of Bermuda or the Bahamas,—but the spirit and character of slavery are every where the same, and cannot fail to produce similar effects. Wherever slavery prevails, there will inevitably be found cruelty and oppression. Individuals who have preserved humane, and amiable, and tolerant dispositions towards their black dependents, may doubtless be found among slave-holders; but even where a happy instance of this sort occurs, such as Mary's first mistress, the kind-hearted Mrs. Williams, the favoured condition of the slave is still as precarious as it is rare: it is every moment at the mercy of events; and must always be held by a tenure so proverbially uncertain as that of human prosperity, or human life. Such examples, like a feeble and flickering streak of light in a gloomy picture, only serve by contrast to exhibit the depth of the prevailing shades. Like other exceptions, they only prove the general rule: the unquestionable tendency of the system is to vitiate the best tempers, and to harden the most feeling hearts. "Never be kind, nor speak kindly to a slave," said an accomplished English lady in South Africa to my wife: "I have now," she added, "been for some time a slave-owner, and have found, from vexatious experience in my own household, that nothing but harshness and hauteur will do with slaves."
But there may be some people who come across this pamphlet, who are not fully aware of the true nature of Black Slavery, and they might be shocked into disbelief, if not outright denial, by the stories of the cruel oppression and brutality exhibited by Capt. I—— and his wife, as well as Mr. D——, the salt manufacturer from Turk's Island. Such individuals may think that there must be some exaggeration; the facts are too horrifying to be true. The facts are indeed horrifying, but unfortunately, that does not make them any less believable. Slavery is a curse to the oppressor just as much as it is to the oppressed: its natural tendency is to dehumanize both. After spending six years in a slave colony, I am inclined to believe that, in terms of its demoralizing effect, the master may even deserve more sympathy than their enslaved person. Let those who doubt the atrocities described in this account, based on the testimony of someone who suffered, look into the details of many similar cases of cruelty that have recently come to light, supported by undeniable evidence. Ignoring the reports from the Fiscal of Berbice,[23] and the horrific revelations from Mauritius,[24] let them consider the case of Mr. and Mrs. Moss from the Bahamas and their slave Kate, which has been justly condemned by the Secretary for the Colonies;[25]—along with the cases of Eleanor Mead,[26]—Henry Williams,[27]—and [38]the Rev. Mr. Bridges and Kitty Hylton,[28] in Jamaica. These cases alone could demonstrate the inevitable tendency of slavery as it exists in our colonies to brutalize the master to a truly alarming extent—a level that often overshadows even the atrocities described in Mary Prince's narrative; and this is enough to prove, regardless of any other evidence, that there is nothing in the shocking nature of the facts to undermine their credibility; on the contrary, similar acts occur frequently in almost every one of our slave colonies today. The system of enforced labor may differ from place to place; it may be more lethal to human life in the sugar industry of Mauritius and Jamaica than in the agricultural and domestic slavery of Bermuda or the Bahamas—but the essence and nature of slavery are the same everywhere and inevitably lead to similar outcomes. Wherever slavery exists, cruelty and oppression will inevitably follow. Individuals who have maintained humane, kind, and tolerant attitudes toward their Black dependents may undoubtedly be found among slave owners; however, even when we encounter a rare example like Mary’s first mistress, the kind-hearted Mrs. Williams, the fortunate condition of the slave remains as fragile as it is exceptional: it is always at the mercy of circumstances; and must be sustained by a tenure as notoriously unreliable as that of human fortune or life itself. Such examples, like a weak and flickering light in a dark picture, only highlight the extent of the prevailing darkness. Like other exceptions, they only confirm the general rule: the clear tendency of the system is to corrupt even the best characters and harden the most compassionate hearts. "Never be kind, nor speak kindly to a slave," said an accomplished English woman in South Africa to my wife: "I have now," she continued, "been a slave owner for some time, and have found, through frustrating experience in my own household, that only harshness and arrogance work with slaves."
I might perhaps not inappropriately illustrate this point more fully by stating many cases which fell under my own personal observation, or became known to me through authentic sources, at the Cape of Good Hope—a colony where slavery assumes, as it is averred, a milder aspect than in any other dependency of the empire where it exists; and I could shew, from the judicial records of that colony, received by me within these few weeks, cases scarcely inferior in barbarity to the worst of those to which I have just specially referred; but to do so would lead me too far from the immediate purpose of this pamphlet, and extend it to an inconvenient length. I shall therefore content myself with quoting a single short passage from the excellent work of my friend Dr. Walsh, entitled "Notices of Brazil,"—a work which, besides its other merits, has vividly illustrated the true spirit of Negro Slavery, as it displays itself not merely in that country, but wherever it has been permitted to open its Pandora's box of misery and crime.
I can probably illustrate this point more clearly by sharing several cases that I've personally witnessed or learned about from reliable sources at the Cape of Good Hope—a colony where slavery is said to be less harsh than in any other part of the empire where it exists. I could show, using the judicial records of that colony I've received just recently, cases that are almost as brutal as the worst ones I just mentioned. However, doing so would distract me from the main purpose of this pamphlet and make it unnecessarily lengthy. So instead, I'll quote a short passage from my friend Dr. Walsh's excellent work, "Notices of Brazil." This book not only has many other strengths but also vividly illustrates the true nature of Negro Slavery, showing the suffering and crimes it brings, not just in that country but wherever it has been allowed to spread its horrors.
Let the reader ponder on the following just remarks, and compare the facts stated by the Author in illustration of them, with the circumstances related at pages 6 and 7 of Mary's narrative:—
Let the reader reflect on the following thoughtful comments, and compare the facts presented by the Author in support of them, with the events described on pages 6 and 7 of Mary's story:—
"If then we put out of the question the injury inflicted on others, and merely consider the deterioration of feeling and principle with which it operates on ourselves, ought it not to be a sufficient, and, indeed, unanswerable argument, against the permission of Slavery?
"If we set aside the harm done to others and only think about how it negatively affects our own feelings and principles, shouldn't that be a strong and undeniable reason to argue against allowing slavery?"
"The exemplary manner in which the paternal duties are performed at home, may mark people as the most fond and affectionate parents; but let them once go abroad, and come within the contagion of slavery, and it seems to alter the very nature of a man; and the father has sold, and still sells, the mother and his children, with as little compunction as he would a sow and her litter of pigs; and he often disposes of them together.
"The way parental duties are carried out at home can make people seem like the most loving and caring parents; however, once they go out into the world and encounter the influence of slavery, it appears to change a person's very nature. The father sells, and continues to sell, the mother and his children with as little remorse as he would have for a sow and her piglets, and he often sells them together."
"This deterioration of feeling is conspicuous in many ways among the Brazilians. They are naturally a people of a humane and good-natured disposition, and much indisposed to cruelty or severity of any kind. Indeed, the manner in which many of them treat their slaves is a proof of this, as it is really gentle and considerate; but the natural tendency to cruelty and oppression in the human heart, is continually evolved by the impunity and uncontrolled licence in which they are exercised. I never walked through the streets of Rio, that some house did not present to me the semblance of a bridewell, where the moans and the cries of the sufferers, and the sounds of whips and scourges within, announced to me that corporal punishment was being inflicted. Whenever I remarked this to a friend, I was always answered that the refractory nature of the slave rendered it necessary, and no house could properly be conducted unless it was practised. But this is certainly not the case; and the chastisement is constantly applied in the very wantonness of barbarity, and would not, and dared not, be inflicted on the humblest wretch in society, if he was not a slave, and so put out of the pale of pity.
This decline in compassion is obvious in many ways among Brazilians. They are naturally a humane and kind-hearted people, generally averse to cruelty or harshness. In fact, the way many treat their slaves shows this, as it is quite gentle and considerate; however, the innate inclination toward cruelty and oppression in human nature is constantly stirred up by the freedom and unchecked power they wield. I never walked through the streets of Rio without encountering some place that resembled a jail, where the moans and cries of the suffering, along with the sounds of whips and lashes inside, told me that physical punishment was being carried out. Whenever I mentioned this to a friend, the response was always that the rebellious nature of the slaves made it necessary, and that no home could be properly run without such practices. But that’s definitely not true; the punishment is often applied out of sheer cruelty and would not, and could not, be inflicted on the humblest person in society if they were not a slave, thus deemed unworthy of compassion.
"Immediately joining our house was one occupied by a mechanic, from which the most dismal cries and moans constantly proceeded. I entered the shop one day, and found it was occupied by a saddler, who had two negro boys working at his business. He was a tawny, cadaverous-looking man, with a dark aspect; and he had cut from his leather a scourge like a Russian knout, which he held in his hand, and was in the act of exercising on one of the naked children in an inner room: and this was the cause of the moans and cries we heard every day, and almost all day long.
"Right next to our house was one rented by a mechanic, from which constant cries and moans echoed. One day, I walked into the shop and found it was actually being run by a saddler, who had two young black boys working for him. He was a pale, sickly-looking man, with a dark demeanor; and he had fashioned a whip resembling a Russian knout from his leather, which he held in his hand, as he was in the process of using it on one of the bare children in a back room. This was the source of the moans and cries we heard every day, almost all day long."
"In the rear of our house was another, occupied by some women of bad character, who kept, as usual, several negro slaves. I was awoke early one morning by dismal cries, and looking out of the window, I saw in the back yard of the house, a black girl of about fourteen years old; before her stood her mistress, a white woman, with a large stick in her hand. She was undressed except her petticoat and chemise, which had fallen down and left her shoulders and bosom bare. Her hair was streaming behind, and every fierce and malevolent passion was depicted in her face. She too, like my hostess at Governo [another striking illustration of the dehumanizing effects of Slavery,] was the very representation of a fury. She was striking the poor girl, whom she had driven up into a corner, where she was on her knees appealing for mercy. She shewed her none, but continued to strike her on the head and thrust the stick into her face, till she was herself exhausted, and her poor victim covered with blood. This scene was renewed every morning, and the cries and moans of the poor suffering blacks, announced that they were enduring the penalty of slavery, in being the objects on which the irritable and malevolent passions of the whites are allowed to vent themselves with impunity; nor could I help deeply deploring that state of society in which the vilest characters in the community are allowed an almost uncontrolled power of life and death, over their innocent, and far more estimable fellow-creatures."—(Notices of Brazil, vol. ii. p. 354-356.)
"In the back of our house, there was another one, occupied by some women of questionable character, who, as usual, kept several Black slaves. Early one morning, I was awakened by terrible screams, and when I looked out of the window, I saw in the backyard a Black girl around fourteen years old. In front of her stood her mistress, a white woman, holding a large stick. She was only wearing a petticoat and a chemise, which had slipped down, leaving her shoulders and chest bare. Her hair was streaming behind her, and every fierce and angry emotion was visible on her face. Like my hostess at Governo [another striking illustration of the dehumanizing effects of Slavery,] she looked like a fury. She was hitting the poor girl, who had been driven into a corner, where she knelt, pleading for mercy. None was shown; the woman continued to strike her on the head and thrust the stick into her face until she was exhausted and her poor victim was covered in blood. This scene repeated every morning, and the cries and moans of the suffering Blacks made it clear they were enduring the harsh realities of slavery, becoming targets for the anger and malice of white people, who could unleash their frustrations without consequence. I couldn't help but feel a profound sadness for a society where the worst individuals have almost unchecked power over the lives of innocent and far more worthy human beings."—(Notices of Brazil, vol. ii. p. 354-356.)
In conclusion, I may observe that the history of Mary Prince furnishes a corollary to Lord Stowell's decision in the case of the slave Grace, and that it is most valuable on this account. Whatever opinions may be held by some readers on the grave question of immediately abolishing Colonial Slavery, nothing assuredly can be more repugnant to the feelings of Englishmen than that the system should be permitted to extend its baneful influence to this country. Yet such is the case, when the slave landed in England still only possesses that qualified degree of freedom, that a change of domicile will determine it. Though born a British subject, and resident within the shores of England, he is cut off from his dearest natural rights by the sad alternative of regaining them at the expence of liberty, and the certainty of severe treatment. It is true that he has the option of returning; but it is a cruel mockery to call it a voluntary choice, when upon his return depend his means of subsistence and his re-union with all that makes life valuable. Here he has tasted "the sweets of freedom," to quote the words of the unfortunate Mary Prince; but if he desires to restore himself to his family, or to escape from suffering and destitution, and the other evils of a climate uncongenial to his constitution and habits, he must abandon the enjoyment of his late-acquired liberty, and again subject himself to the arbitrary power of a vindictive master.
In conclusion, I would point out that the history of Mary Prince provides a parallel to Lord Stowell's decision in the case of the slave Grace, and that it is very valuable for this reason. Whatever opinions some readers may have about the serious matter of immediately ending Colonial Slavery, nothing can be more offensive to the values of English people than allowing the system to spread its harmful influence to this country. Unfortunately, this is the situation when a slave arrives in England, as they still only have a limited level of freedom, which can be revoked simply by changing their living situation. Although they were born a British subject and live within the borders of England, they are stripped of their most cherished natural rights due to the unfortunate requirement of having to regain them at the cost of their freedom and the certainty of harsh treatment. It’s true they can choose to go back, but it’s a cruel joke to call it a voluntary choice when their means of survival and reunion with everything important in life depend on that return. Here, they have experienced "the sweets of freedom," to quote the unfortunate Mary Prince; but if they want to reunite with their family or escape suffering and poverty, along with other hardships of a climate unfit for their health and lifestyle, they must give up their newly acquired freedom and once again submit to the arbitrary control of a vengeful master.
The case of Mary Prince is by no means a singular one; many of the same kind are daily occurring: and even if the case were singular, it would still loudly call for the interference of the legislature. In instances of this kind no injury can possibly be done to the owner by confirming to the slave his resumption of his natural rights. It is the master's spontaneous act to bring him to this country; he knows when he brings him that he divests himself of his property; and it is, in fact, a minor species of slave trading, when he has thus enfranchised his slave, to re-capture that slave by the necessities of his condition, or by working upon the better feelings of his heart. Abstractedly from all legal technicalities, there is no real difference between thus compelling the return of the enfranchised negro, and trepanning a free native of England by delusive hopes into perpetual slavery. The most ingenious casuist could not point out any essential distinction between the two cases. Our boasted liberty is the dream of imagination, and no longer the characteristic of our country, if its bulwarks can thus be thrown down by colonial special pleading. It would well become the character of the present Government to introduce a Bill into the Legislature making perpetual that freedom which the slave has acquired by his passage here, and thus to declare, in the most ample sense of the words, (what indeed we had long fondly believed to be the fact, though it now appears that we have been mistaken,) that no slave can exist within the shores of Great Britain.
The case of Mary Prince is not unique; similar situations happen every day. Even if it were unique, it would still urgently require legislative intervention. In such cases, no harm can come to the owner by recognizing the slave's natural rights. The master made the choice to bring him to this country, fully aware that he would lose ownership of him. When a master has freed his slave, trying to forcibly reclaim that slave by exploiting their circumstances or emotions is essentially a form of human trafficking. When you strip away all the legal jargon, there's no real difference between forcing an enfranchised black person back into bondage and tricking a free native of England into perpetual slavery through false promises. Even the most skilled debater wouldn’t find a significant difference between the two situations. Our celebrated freedom is merely an illusion and is no longer a hallmark of our nation if it can be undermined by colonial arguments. It would be appropriate for the current Government to propose a Bill that solidifies the freedom that the slave has gained by arriving here, clearly stating—something we have long believed to be true, though it seems we were wrong—that No slave can exist on the shores of Great Britain..
FOOTNOTES:
[2] Let the reader compare the above affecting account, taken down from the mouth of this negro woman, with the following description of a vendue of slaves at the Cape of Good Hope, published by me in 1826, from the letter of a friend,—and mark their similarity in several characteristic circumstances. The resemblance is easily accounted for: slavery wherever it prevails produces similar effects.—"Having heard that there was to be a sale of cattle, farm stock, &c. by auction, at a Veld-Cornet's in the vicinity, we halted our waggon one day for the purpose of procuring a fresh spann of oxen. Among the stock of the farm sold, was a female slave and her three children. The two eldest children were girls, the one about thirteen years of age, and the other about eleven; the youngest was a boy. The whole family were exhibited together, but they were sold separately, and to different purchasers. The farmers examined them as if they had been so many head of cattle. While the sale was going on, the mother and her children were exhibited on a table, that they might be seen by the company, which was very large. There could not have been a finer subject for an able painter than this unhappy group. The tears, the anxiety, the anguish of the mother, while she met the gaze of the multitude, eyed the different countenances of the bidders, or cast a heart-rending look upon the children; and the simplicity and touching sorrow of the young ones, while they clung to their distracted parent, wiping their eyes, and half concealing their faces,—contrasted with the marked insensibility and jocular countenances of the spectators and purchasers,—furnished a striking commentary on the miseries of slavery, and its debasing effects upon the hearts of its abettors. While the woman was in this distressed situation she was asked, 'Can you feed sheep?' Her reply was so indistinct that it escaped me; but it was probably in the negative, for her purchaser rejoined, in a loud and harsh voice, 'Then I will teach you with the sjamboc,' (a whip made of the rhinoceros' hide.) The mother and her three children were sold to three separate purchasers; and they were literally torn from each other."—Ed.
[2] Let the reader compare the moving account above, taken from the words of this black woman, with the following description of a slave auction at the Cape of Good Hope, which I published in 1826 from a friend's letter, and note the similarities in several key details. The resemblance is easily explained: slavery, wherever it exists, produces similar effects.—"Having heard that there was going to be an auction to sell cattle, farm stock, etc. at a nearby Veld-Cornet's place, we stopped our wagon one day to get a fresh set of oxen. Among the farm stock being sold was a female slave and her three children. The two oldest children were girls, one about thirteen years old and the other about eleven; the youngest was a boy. The whole family was displayed together, but they were sold separately, each to different buyers. The farmers examined them as if they were just livestock. While the sale was happening, the mother and her children were shown on a platform so they could be seen by the large crowd. There couldn’t have been a better subject for a skilled painter than this miserable scene. The tears, the anxiety, the anguish of the mother, as she faced the crowd, glanced at the different bidders, or cast a heart-wrenching look at her children; alongside the innocence and sorrow of the young ones as they clung to their distraught parent, wiped their eyes, and half-hidden their faces—this contrasted sharply with the blatant indifference and joking expressions of the onlookers and buyers—offering a powerful commentary on the horrors of slavery and its degrading effects on the hearts of those who support it. While the woman was in this agonizing situation, someone asked her, 'Can you herd sheep?' Her response was so faint that I couldn't catch it, but it was likely negative, for her buyer responded in a loud, harsh voice, 'Then I'll teach you with the sjamboc,' (a whip made from rhinoceros hide.) The mother and her three children were sold to three different buyers; they were literally ripped apart from each other."—Ed.
[4] The cattle on a small plantation in Bermuda are, it seems, often thus staked or tethered, both night and day, in situations where grass abounds.
[4] The cattle on a small farm in Bermuda are often tied up or held in place, both at night and during the day, in areas where there is plenty of grass.
[5] A cow fed for slaughter.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ A beef cattle.
[7] Of the subsequent lot of her relatives she can tell but little. She says, her father died while she and her mother were at Turk's Island; and that he had been long dead and buried before any of his children in Bermuda knew of it, they being slaves on other estates. Her mother died after Mary went to Antigua. Of the fate of the rest of her kindred, seven brothers and three sisters, she knows nothing further than this—that the eldest sister, who had several children to her master, was taken by him to Trinidad; and that the youngest, Rebecca, is still alive, and in slavery in Bermuda. Mary herself is now about forty-three years of age.—Ed.
[7] She can't share much about the rest of her relatives. She says her father died while she and her mother were at Turk's Island, and he had been dead and buried for a long time before any of his children in Bermuda found out, as they were slaves on other estates. Her mother died after Mary went to Antigua. She doesn’t know anything else about her other family members, seven brothers and three sisters, except that the oldest sister, who had several children with her master, was taken to Trinidad, and the youngest, Rebecca, is still alive and living in slavery in Bermuda. Mary herself is now about forty-three years old.—Ed.
[9] About £67. 10s. sterling.
About £67. 10s. sterling.
[12] She possesses a copy of Mrs. Trimmer's "Charity School Spelling Book," presented to her by the Rev. Mr. Curtin, and dated August 30, 1817. In this book her name is written "Mary, Princess of Wales"—an appellation which, she says, was given her by her owners. It is a common practice with the colonists to give ridiculous names of this description to their slaves; being, in fact, one of the numberless modes of expressing the habitual contempt with which they regard the negro race.—In printing this narrative we have retained Mary's paternal name of Prince.—Ed.
[12] She has a copy of Mrs. Trimmer's "Charity School Spelling Book," given to her by Rev. Mr. Curtin, dated August 30, 1817. In this book, her name is written as "Mary, Princess of Wales"—a title she says her owners gave her. It's common for colonists to give silly names like this to their slaves, reflecting the deep-seated contempt they have for the black race. —In publishing this story, we have kept Mary's family name of Prince.—Ed.
[14] She came first to the Anti-Slavery Office in Aldermanbury, about the latter end of November 1828; and her case was referred to Mr. George Stephen to be investigated. More of this hereafter.—Ed.
[14] She first arrived at the Anti-Slavery Office in Aldermanbury around the end of November 1828, and her case was passed on to Mr. George Stephen for investigation. More on this later.—Ed.
[17] She means West Indians.
She means Caribbean people.
[19] I omit the circumstance here mentioned, because it is too indecent to appear in a publication likely to be perused by females. It is, in all probability, a vile calumny; but even if it were perfectly true, it would not serve Mr. Wood's case one straw.—Any reader who wishes it, may see the passage referred to, in the autograph letter in my possession. T. P.
[19] I'm leaving out the detail mentioned here because it's too inappropriate for a publication likely to be read by women. It’s probably a nasty lie, but even if it were completely true, it wouldn't help Mr. Wood's case at all. Any reader who wants to can see the passage I’m referring to in the handwritten letter I have. T. P.
[20] In elucidation of the circumstances above referred to, I subjoin the following extracts from the Report of the Birmingham Ladies' Society for 1830:—
[20] To clarify the situations mentioned above, I am including the following excerpts from the Report of the Birmingham Ladies' Society for 1830:—
"As a portion of the funds of this association has been appropriated to assist the benevolent efforts of a society which has for fifteen years afforded relief to distressed and deserted slaves in Antigua, it may not be uninteresting to our friends to learn the manner in which the agent of this society has been treated for simply obeying the command of our Saviour, by ministering, like the good Samaritan, to the distresses of the helpless and the desolate. The society's proceedings being adverted to by a friend of Africa, at one of the public meetings held in this country, a West Indian planter, who was present, wrote over to his friends in Antigua, and represented the conduct of the distributors of this charity in such a light, that it was deemed worthy of the cognizance of the House of Assembly. Mr. Joseph Phillips, a resident of the island, who had most kindly and disinterestedly exerted himself in the distribution of the money from England among the poor deserted slaves, was brought before the Assembly, and most severely interrogated: on his refusing to deliver up his private correspondence with his friends in England, he was thrown into a loathsome jail, where he was kept for nearly five months; while his loss of business, and the oppressive proceedings instituted against him, were involving him in poverty and ruin. On his discharge by the House of Assembly, he was seized in their lobby for debt, and again imprisoned."
"As part of the funds from this association has been allocated to support the charitable efforts of a society that has provided aid to distressed and abandoned slaves in Antigua for fifteen years, it might be interesting for our friends to hear how the agent of this society has been treated simply for following our Savior's command, by helping the needy and the lonely like the good Samaritan. When a friend of Africa mentioned the society's activities at a public meeting held in this country, a West Indian plantation owner who was present wrote to his friends in Antigua, portraying the actions of the charity's distributors in such a way that it caught the attention of the House of Assembly. Mr. Joseph Phillips, a local resident who had selflessly worked to distribute the funds from England among the abandoned slaves, was summoned before the Assembly and was questioned very harshly. When he refused to surrender his private correspondence with his friends in England, he was thrown into a disgusting jail, where he remained for nearly five months. During this time, the loss of his business and the harsh actions taken against him plunged him into poverty and despair. Upon his release by the House of Assembly, he was immediately arrested for debt in their lobby and imprisoned again."
"In our report for the year 1826, we quoted a passage from the 13th Report of the Society for the relief of deserted Slaves in the island of Antigua, in reference to a case of great distress. This statement fell into the hands of Mr. M'Queen, the Editor of the Glasgow Courier. Of the consequences resulting from this circumstance we only gained information through the Leicester Chronicle, which had copied an article from the Weekly Register of Antigua, dated St. John's, September 22, 1829. We find from this that Mr. M'Queen affirms, that 'with the exception of the fact that the society is, as it deserves to be, duped out of its money, the whole tale' (of the distress above referred to) 'is an abominable falsehood.' This statement, which we are informed has appeared in many of the public papers, is completely refuted in our Appendix, No. 4, to which we refer our readers. Mr. M'Queen's statements, we regret to say, would lead many to believe that there are no deserted Negroes to assist; and that the case mentioned was a perfect fabrication. He also distinctly avers, that the disinterested and humane agent of the society, Mr. Joseph Phillips, is 'a man of the most worthless and abandoned character.' In opposition to this statement, we learn the good character of Mr. Phillips from those who have long been acquainted with his laudable exertions in the cause of humanity, and from the Editor of the Weekly Register of Antigua, who speaks, on his own knowledge, of more than twenty years back; confidently appealing at the same time to the inhabitants of the colony in which he resides for the truth of his averments, and producing a testimonial to Mr. Phillips's good character signed by two members of the Antigua House of Assembly, and by Mr. Wyke, the collector of his Majesty's customs, and by Antigua merchants, as follows—'that they have been acquainted with him the last four years and upwards, and he has always conducted himself in an upright becoming manner—his character we know to be unimpeached, and his morals unexceptionable.'
"In our report for the year 1826, we quoted a passage from the 13th Report of the Society for the Relief of Deserted Slaves in Antigua regarding a case of great distress. This statement came to the attention of Mr. M'Queen, the Editor of the Glasgow Courier. We learned about the fallout from this through the Leicester Chronicle, which had republished an article from the Weekly Register of Antigua, dated St. John's, September 22, 1829. It indicates that Mr. M'Queen claims that 'aside from the fact that the society is, as it deserves, being tricked out of its money, the whole story' (about the distress mentioned) 'is a complete lie.' This assertion, which we've been told has appeared in many public papers, is totally debunked in our Appendix, No. 4, to which we direct our readers. We regret to say that Mr. M'Queen's claims could mislead many into thinking there are no deserted individuals needing help, and that the mentioned case was entirely made up. He also clearly states that the selfless and compassionate agent of the society, Mr. Joseph Phillips, is 'a man of the most worthless and depraved character.' In contrast to this assertion, we hear of Mr. Phillips's good reputation from those who have long been familiar with his commendable efforts in the cause of humanity, and from the Editor of the Weekly Register of Antigua, who speaks from personal knowledge dating back more than twenty years; he confidently appeals to the residents of the colony where he lives for the truth of his statements, and provides a testimonial to Mr. Phillips's good character signed by two members of the Antigua House of Assembly, and by Mr. Wyke, the collector of His Majesty's customs, as well as by Antigua merchants, stating—'that they have known him for the last four years and more, and he has always behaved in an upright and proper manner—his character is known to be unblemished, and his morals exemplary.'"
(Signed) "Thomas Saunderson John D. Taylor
John A. Wood George Wyke
Samuel L. Darrel Giles S. Musson
Robert Grant."
(Signed)Thomas Saunderson John D. Taylor
John A. Wood George Wyke
Samuel L. Darrel Giles S. Musson
Robert Grant.
"St. John's, Antigua, June 28, 1825."
"St. John's, Antigua, June 28, 1825."
In addition to the above testimonies, Mr. Phillips has brought over to England with him others of a more recent date, from some of the most respectable persons in Antigua—sufficient to cover with confusion all his unprincipled calumniators. See also his account of his own case in the Anti-Slavery Reporter, No. 74, p. 69.
In addition to the testimonies mentioned, Mr. Phillips has also brought with him more recent ones from some of the most respectable people in Antigua—enough to embarrass all his dishonest critics. See also his account of his own situation in the Anti-Slavery Reporter, No. 74, p. 69.
[21] If it even were so, how strong a plea of palliation might not the poor negro bring, by adducing the neglect of her various owners to afford religious instruction or moral discipline, and the habitual influence of their evil example (to say the very least,) before her eyes? What moral good could she possibly learn—what moral evil could she easily escape, while under the uncontrolled power of such masters as she describes Captain I—— and Mr. D—— of Turk's Island? All things considered, it is indeed wonderful to find her such as she now is. But as she has herself piously expressed it, "that God whom then she knew not mercifully preserved her for better things."
[21] Even if that were the case, how strong of a defense could the poor Black woman make by pointing out how her various owners neglected to provide her with religious guidance or moral education, and their constant negative influence right in front of her? What good could she possibly learn about morality—what bad could she avoid—while being under the complete control of such masters as she describes, Captain I—— and Mr. D—— of Turk's Island? Taking everything into account, it’s truly remarkable that she is who she is today. But as she has humbly stated, "that God whom she did not know at the time mercifully preserved her for better things."
[22] Since the preceding pages were printed off, I have been favoured with a communication from the Rev. J. Curtin, to whom among other acquaintances of Mr. Wood's in this country, the entire proof sheets of this pamphlet had been sent for inspection. Mr. Curtin corrects some omissions and inaccuracies in Mary Prince's narrative (see page 17,) by stating, 1. That she was baptized, not in August, but on the 6th of April, 1817; 2. That sometime before her baptism, on her being admitted a catechumen, preparatory to that holy ordinance, she brought a note from her owner, Mr. Wood, recommending her for religious instruction, &c.; 3. That it was his usual practice, when any adult slaves came on week days to school, to require their owners' permission for their attendance; but that on Sundays the chapel was open indiscriminately to all.—Mary, after a personal interview with Mr. Curtin, and after hearing his letter read by me, still maintains that Mr. Wood's note recommended her for baptism merely, and that she never received any religious instruction whatever from Mr. and Mrs. Wood, or from any one else at that period beyond what she has stated in her narrative. In regard to her non-admission to the Sunday school without permission from her owners, she admits that she may possibly have mistaken the clergyman's meaning on that point, but says that such was certainly her impression at the time, and the actual cause of her non-attendance.
[22] Since the previous pages were printed, I've received a message from Rev. J. Curtin, to whom, along with some other acquaintances of Mr. Wood in this country, the complete proof sheets of this pamphlet were sent for review. Mr. Curtin clarifies some omissions and inaccuracies in Mary Prince's story (see page 17) by stating: 1. That she was baptized not in August, but on April 6, 1817; 2. That sometime before her baptism, when she was admitted as a catechumen, preparing for that sacred rite, she provided a note from her owner, Mr. Wood, recommending her for religious instruction, etc.; 3. That it was his standard practice, when any adult slaves came to school on weekdays, to require permission from their owners for their attendance; however, on Sundays, the chapel was open to everyone. —Mary, after meeting with Mr. Curtin and hearing his letter read by me, still insists that Mr. Wood's note only recommended her for baptism and that she never received any religious instruction from Mr. and Mrs. Wood or anyone else at that time beyond what she has already mentioned in her story. Regarding her not being allowed to attend Sunday school without permission from her owners, she acknowledges that she might have misunderstood the clergyman's intention on that matter, but insists that this was definitely her impression at that time and what led to her not attending.
Mr. Curtin finds in his books some reference to Mary's connection with a Captain ——, (the individual, I believe, alluded to by Mr. Phillips at page 32); but he states that when she attended his chapel she was always decently and becomingly dressed, and appeared to him to be in a situation of trust in her mistress's family.
Mr. Curtin finds in his books some reference to Mary's connection with a Captain ——, (the person, I think, mentioned by Mr. Phillips on page 32); but he notes that when she visited his chapel, she was always appropriately and stylishly dressed, and seemed to him to be in a trusted position within her mistress's family.
Mr. Curtin offers no comment on any other part of Mary's statement; but he speaks in very favourable, though general terms of the respectability of Mr. Wood, whom he had known for many years in Antigua; and of Mrs. Wood, though she was not personally known to him, he says, that he had "heard her spoken of by those of her acquaintance, as a lady of very mild and amiable manners."
Mr. Curtin doesn’t comment on any other part of Mary's statement, but he speaks highly, though generally, of Mr. Wood, whom he has known for many years in Antigua. As for Mrs. Wood, although he doesn’t know her personally, he mentions that he has “heard people who know her describe her as a lady with very gentle and pleasant manners.”
Another friend of Mr. and Mrs. Wood, a lady who had been their guest both in Antigua and England, alleges that Mary has grossly misrepresented them in her narrative; and says that she "can vouch for their being the most benevolent, kind-hearted people that can possibly live." She has declined, however, to furnish me with any written correction of the misrepresentations she complains of, although I offered to insert her testimony in behalf of her friends, if sent to me in time. And having already kept back the publication a fortnight waiting for communications of this sort, I will not delay it longer. Those who have withheld their strictures have only themselves to blame.
Another friend of Mr. and Mrs. Wood, a woman who had stayed with them in both Antigua and England, claims that Mary has seriously misrepresented them in her story; she states that she "can confirm they are the most generous, kind-hearted people you could ever meet." However, she has refused to provide me with any written correction of the misrepresentations she mentions, even though I offered to include her testimony in support of her friends if it was sent to me in time. Since I've already delayed the publication for two weeks waiting for such feedback, I won't hold it up any longer. Those who haven't shared their criticisms have only themselves to blame.
Of the general character of Mr. and Mrs. Wood, I would not designedly give any unfair impression. Without implicitly adopting either the ex parte view of Mary Prince, or the unmeasured encomiums of their friends, I am willing to believe them to be, on the whole, fair, perhaps favourable, specimens of colonial character. Let them even be rated, if you will, in the very highest and most benevolent class of slave-holders; and, laying everything else entirely out of view, let Mr. Wood's conduct in this affair be tried exclusively by the facts established beyond dispute, and by his own statement of the case in his letter to Mr. Taylor. But then, I ask, if the very best and mildest of your slave-owners can act as Mr. Wood is proved to have acted, what is to be expected of persons whose mildness, or equity, or common humanity no one will dare to vouch for? If such things are done in the green tree, what will be done in the dry?—And what else then can Colonial Slavery possibly be, even in its best estate, but a system incurably evil and iniquitous?—I require no other data—I need add no further comment.
I don’t want to give an unfair impression of Mr. and Mrs. Wood. Without fully adopting either Mary Prince’s biased perspective or the excessive praise from their friends, I’m willing to see them, overall, as somewhat fair and possibly positive examples of colonial character. Even if we must classify them among the very best and most kind-hearted slaveholders, and if we set everything else aside, let’s judge Mr. Wood’s actions in this situation solely based on the undeniable facts and his own account in his letter to Mr. Taylor. But then I ask, if even the very best and mildest slave owners can behave as Mr. Wood has been shown to act, what can we expect from those whose kindness, fairness, or basic humanity no one would dare to guarantee? If such actions happen among those who are regarded as good, what will happen among those who are not? What else can colonial slavery possibly be, even at its best, but a fundamentally evil and unjust system? I need no further evidence—I have nothing more to add.
[24] Ibid, No. 44.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Same source, No. 44.
[25] Ibid, No. 47.
Ibid, No. 47.
NARRATIVE OF LOUIS ASA-ASA,
A CAPTURED AFRICAN.
The following interesting narrative is a convenient supplement to the history of Mary Prince. It is given, like hers, as nearly as possible in the narrator's words, with only so much correction as was necessary to connect the story, and render it grammatical. The concluding passage in inverted commas, is entirely his own.
The following engaging story is a helpful addition to the history of Mary Prince. It is presented, like hers, in the narrator's own words, with just enough editing to make the story flow and ensure it’s grammatically correct. The final section in quotation marks is entirely his own.
While Mary's narrative shews the disgusting character of colonial slavery, this little tale explains with equal force the horrors in which it originates.
While Mary's story reveals the repulsive nature of colonial slavery, this short tale equally underscores the horrors from which it stems.
It is necessary to explain that Louis came to this country about five years ago, in a French vessel called the Pearl. She had lost her reckoning, and was driven by stress of weather into the port of St. Ives, in Cornwall. Louis and his four companions were brought to London upon a writ of Habeas Corpus at the instance of Mr. George Stephen; and, after some trifling opposition on the part of the master of the vessel, were discharged by Lord Wynford. Two of his unfortunate fellow-sufferers died of the measles at Hampstead; the other two returned to Sierra Leone; but poor Louis, when offered the choice of going back to Africa, replied, "Me no father, no mother now; me stay with you." And here he has ever since remained; conducting himself in a way to gain the good will and respect of all who know him. He is remarkably intelligent, understands our language perfectly, and can read and write well. The last sentences of the following narrative will seem almost too peculiar to be his own; but it is not the first time that in conversation with Mr. George Stephen, he has made similar remarks. On one occasion in particular, he was heard saying to himself in the kitchen, while sitting by the fire apparently in deep thought, "Me think,—me think——" A fellow-servant inquired what he meant; and he added, "Me think what a good thing I came to England! Here, I know what God is, and read my Bible; in my country they have no God, no Bible."
It's important to clarify that Louis arrived in this country about five years ago on a French ship called the Pearl. The ship lost its way and was pushed by bad weather into the port of St. Ives in Cornwall. Louis and his four companions were brought to London under a writ of Habeas Corpus at the request of Mr. George Stephen; and after some minor opposition from the captain of the ship, they were released by Lord Wynford. Two of his unfortunate fellow travelers died of measles in Hampstead; the other two returned to Sierra Leone. But poor Louis, when given the option to go back to Africa, said, "I have no father, no mother now; I will stay with you." And he has been here ever since, behaving in a way that has earned him the goodwill and respect of everyone who knows him. He is very intelligent, understands our language perfectly, and can read and write well. The last sentences of the following narrative may seem too strange to be his own; however, this isn't the first time he’s made similar comments in conversation with Mr. George Stephen. On one occasion in particular, he was heard talking to himself in the kitchen, sitting by the fire and seemingly lost in thought, saying, "I think—I think—" A fellow servant asked what he meant; and he replied, "I think about how good it is that I came to England! Here, I know what God is, and I can read my Bible; in my country, they have no God, no Bible."
How severe and just a reproof to the guilty wretches who visit his country only with fire and sword! How deserved a censure upon the not less guilty men, who dare to vindicate the state of slavery, on the[42] lying pretext, that its victims are of an inferior nature! And scarcely less deserving of reprobation are those who have it in their power to prevent these crimes, but who remain inactive from indifference, or are dissuaded from throwing the shield of British power over the victim of oppression, by the sophistry, and the clamour, and the avarice of the oppressor. It is the reproach and the sin of England. May God avert from our country the ruin which this national guilt deserves!
How harsh and fitting a rebuke to the wretched people who come to his country only with violence! How warranted the criticism of the equally guilty individuals who dare to defend slavery, using the false argument that its victims are lesser beings! And those who can stop these atrocities but choose to stay silent out of apathy, or are discouraged from protecting the oppressed by the lies, shouting, and greed of the oppressors, deserve condemnation as well. This is England’s shame and wrongdoing. May God protect our country from the destruction that this national guilt deserves!
We lament to add, that the Pearl which brought these negroes to our shore, was restored to its owners at the instance of the French Government, instead of being condemned as a prize to Lieut. Rye, who, on his own responsibility, detained her, with all her manacles and chains and other detestable proofs of her piratical occupation on board. We trust it is not yet too late to demand investigation into the reasons for restoring her.
We regret to say that the Pearl, which brought these enslaved people to our shores, was returned to its owners at the request of the French Government, instead of being seized as a prize by Lieut. Rye, who took it upon himself to hold her, along with all her shackles and chains and other terrible evidence of her role in piracy. We hope it’s not too late to ask for an investigation into the reasons for returning her.
The Negro Boy's Narrative.
My father's name was Clashoquin; mine is Asa-Asa. He lived in a country called Bycla, near Egie, a large town. Egie is as large as Brighton; it was some way from the sea. I had five brothers and sisters. We all lived together with my father and mother; he kept a horse, and was respectable, but not one of the great men. My uncle was one of the great men at Egie: he could make men come and work for him: his name was Otou. He had a great deal of land and cattle. My father sometimes worked on his own land, and used to make charcoal. I was too little to work; my eldest brother used to work on the land; and we were all very happy.
My father's name was Clashoquin; mine is Asa-Asa. He lived in a place called Bycla, close to Egie, a large town. Egie is as big as Brighton; it was a bit far from the sea. I had five siblings. We all lived together with our parents; he had a horse and was respected, but he wasn't one of the big shots. My uncle was one of the important people in Egie: he could get men to come and work for him; his name was Otou. He owned a lot of land and cattle. Sometimes my dad worked on his own land and made charcoal. I was too young to work; my oldest brother worked the land, and we were all very happy.
A great many people, whom we called Adinyés, set fire to Egie in the morning before daybreak; there were some thousands of them. They killed a great many, and burnt all their houses. They staid two days, and then carried away all the people whom they did not kill.
A lot of people, who we called Adinyés, set fire to Egie early in the morning before dawn; there were thousands of them. They killed many people and burned all their homes. They stayed for two days and then took all the people they didn’t kill.
They came again every now and then for a month, as long as they could find people to carry away. They used to tie them by the feet, except when they were taking them off, and then they let them loose; but if they offered to run away, they would shoot them. I lost a great many friends and relations at Egie; about a dozen. They sold all they carried away, to be slaves. I know this because I afterwards saw them as slaves on the other side of the sea. They took away brothers, and sisters, and husbands, and wives; they did not care about this. They were sold for cloth or gunpowder, sometimes for salt or guns; sometimes they got four or five guns for a man: they were English guns, made like my master's that I clean for his shooting. The Adinyés burnt a great many places besides Egie. They burnt all the country wherever they found villages; they used to shoot men, women, and children, if they ran away.
They came back every now and then for a month, as long as they could find people to take away. They used to tie them by the feet, except when they were transporting them, and then they would let them go; but if anyone tried to run away, they would shoot them. I lost a lot of friends and family at Egie—about a dozen. They sold everyone they took away into slavery. I know this because I later saw them as slaves on the other side of the ocean. They took away brothers, sisters, husbands, and wives; they didn’t care about that. They were traded for cloth or gunpowder, sometimes for salt or guns; sometimes they got four or five guns for each person: they were English guns, made like the ones my master has that I clean for his hunting. The Adinyés destroyed many places besides Egie. They burned down all the surrounding areas wherever they found villages; they would shoot men, women, and children if they tried to escape.
They came to us about eleven o'clock one day, and directly they came they set our house on fire. All of us had run away. We kept together, and went into the woods, and stopped there two days. The Adinyés then went away, and we returned home and found every thing burnt. We tried to build a little shed, and were beginning to get comfortable[43] again. We found several of our neighbours lying about wounded; they had been shot. I saw the bodies of four or five little children whom they had killed with blows on the head. They had carried away their fathers and mothers, but the children were too small for slaves, so they killed them. They had killed several others, but these were all that I saw. I saw them lying in the street like dead dogs.
They came to us around eleven o'clock one day, and as soon as they arrived, they set our house on fire. We all ran away together and went into the woods, where we stayed for two days. Once the Adinyés left, we returned home and found everything burned down. We tried to build a small shelter, and we were starting to feel a bit comfortable[43] again. We discovered several of our neighbors lying around injured; they had been shot. I saw the bodies of four or five little kids who had been killed with blows to the head. They had taken away their fathers and mothers, but the children were too young to be enslaved, so they killed them. They had killed several others, but these were the only ones I saw. I saw them lying in the street like dead dogs.
In about a week after we got back, the Adinyés returned, and burnt all the sheds and houses they had left standing. We all ran away again; we went to the woods as we had done before.—They followed us the next day. We went farther into the woods, and staid there about four days and nights; we were half starved; we only got a few potatoes. My uncle Otou was with us. At the end of this time, the Adinyés found us. We ran away. They called my uncle to go to them; but he refused, and they shot him immediately: they killed him. The rest of us ran on, and they did not get at us till the next day. I ran up into a tree: they followed me and brought me down. They tied my feet. I do not know if they found my father and mother, and brothers and sisters: they had run faster than me, and were half a mile farther when I got up into the tree: I have never seen them since.—There was a man who ran up into the tree with me: I believe they shot him, for I never saw him again.
About a week after we returned, the Adinyés came back and burned down all the sheds and houses they had left standing. We all ran away again and headed to the woods like we had before. They tracked us the next day. We moved deeper into the woods and stayed there for about four days and nights; we were nearly starving and only found a few potatoes. My uncle Otou was with us. After a while, the Adinyés located us. We took off running again. They called my uncle to come to them, but he refused, and they shot him right there: they killed him. The rest of us ran on, and they didn't catch up to us until the next day. I climbed up into a tree; they followed me and dragged me down. They tied my feet. I don't know if they found my father, mother, brothers, and sisters; they had run faster than me and were half a mile ahead by the time I got up into the tree: I've never seen them since. A man ran up into the tree with me; I believe they shot him because I never saw him again.
They carried away about twenty besides me. They carried us to the sea. They did not beat us: they only killed one man, who was very ill and too weak to carry his load: they made all of us carry chickens and meat for our food; but this poor man could not carry his load, and they ran him through the body with a sword.—He was a neighbour of ours. When we got to the sea they sold all of us, but not to the same person. They sold us for money; and I was sold six times over, sometimes for money, sometimes for cloth, and sometimes for a gun. I was about thirteen years old. It was about half a year from the time I was taken, before I saw the white people.
They took about twenty of us, including me. They brought us to the sea. They didn’t beat us; they only killed one man who was very sick and too weak to carry his load. We all had to carry chickens and meat for our food, but this poor man couldn’t manage, so they stabbed him with a sword. He was our neighbor. When we arrived at the sea, they sold all of us, but not to the same person. They sold us for money; I was sold six times, sometimes for money, sometimes for cloth, and sometimes for a gun. I was about thirteen years old. It took almost six months from when I was taken until I saw white people.
We were taken in a boat from place to place, and sold at every place we stopped at. In about six months we got to a ship, in which we first saw white people: they were French. They bought us. We found here a great many other slaves; there were about eighty, including women and children. The Frenchmen sent away all but five of us into another very large ship. We five staid on board till we got to England, which was about five or six months. The slaves we saw on board the ship were chained together by the legs below deck, so close they could not move. They were flogged very cruelly: I saw one of them flogged till he died; we could not tell what for. They gave them enough to eat. The place they were confined in below deck was so hot and nasty I could not bear to be in it. A great many of the slaves were ill, but they were not attended to. They used to flog me very bad on board the ship: the captain cut my head very bad one time.
We were taken on a boat from one place to another and sold at each stop. After about six months, we arrived at a ship where we first saw white people—specifically, French. They bought us and there were many other slaves with us; about eighty in total, including women and children. The Frenchmen sent all but five of us to another large ship. The five of us stayed on board until we reached England, which took about five or six months. The slaves we saw on the ship were chained together by their legs below deck, so tightly that they couldn’t move. They were whipped very brutally; I saw one of them whipped until he died, and we didn’t know why. They provided enough food for them. The space they were kept in below deck was so hot and filthy that I could hardly stand it. Many of the slaves were sick, but nobody took care of them. They used to beat me very badly on the ship; at one point, the captain hurt my head really badly.
"I am very happy to be in England, as far as I am very well;—but I have no friend belonging to me, but God, who will take care of me as he has done already. I am very glad I have come to England, to know who God is. I should like much to see my friends again, but I do not now wish to go back to them: for if I go back to my own[44] country, I might be taken as a slave again. I would rather stay here, where I am free, than go back to my country to be sold. I shall stay in England as long as (please God) I shall live. I wish the King of England could know all I have told you. I wish it that he may see how cruelly we are used. We had no king in our country, or he would have stopt it. I think the king of England might stop it, and this is why I wish him to know it all. I have heard say he is good; and if he is, he will stop it if he can. I am well off myself, for I am well taken care of, and have good bed and good clothes; but I wish my own people to be as comfortable."
"I’m really happy to be in England, especially since I’m doing well; but I have no one to rely on but God, who has already cared for me. I’m really glad I came to England to understand who God is. I would love to see my friends again, but I don’t want to return to them right now because if I go back to my own[44] country, I might be captured as a slave again. I would rather stay here, where I am free, than go back to be sold. I’ll stay in England as long as I live, God willing. I wish the King of England could know everything I’ve shared with you. I want him to see how cruelly we are treated. We had no king in our country, or he would have stopped it. I believe the king of England might be able to stop it, which is why I want him to know everything. I’ve heard he is a good man, and if he is, he will put an end to it if he can. I’m doing well because I’m well cared for and have a good bed and good clothes, but I want my own people to be just as comfortable."
"LOUIS ASA-ASA."
"LOUIS ASA-ASA."
"London, January 31, 1831."
"London, January 31, 1831."
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!