This is a modern-English version of A Study of Pueblo Architecture: Tusayan and Cibola: Eighth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1886-1887, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1891, pages 3-228, originally written by Mindeleff, Cosmos, Mindeleff, Victor.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Some words in the text have variant spellings that were left unchanged. The main ones are:
nyumu: sometimes hyphenated as nyu-mu
nyumu: sometimes written as nyu-mu
Mashongnavi, Shupaulovi, Sichumovi (names): sometimes written with accents as Mashóngnavi, Shupaúlovi, Sichúmovi
Mashongnavi, Shupaulovi, Sichumovi (names): sometimes written with accents as Mashóngnavi, Shupaúlovi, Sichúmovi
Brackets and parenthetical question marks are as in the original. A few typographical errors have been corrected. They are marked in the text with mouse-hover popups.
Brackets and parenthetical question marks are the same as in the original. A few typos have been fixed. They are indicated in the text with mouse-hover popups.
A STUDY
OF
PUEBLO ARCHITECTURE:
TUSAYAN AND CIBOLA.
BY
VICTOR MINDELEFF.
CONTENTS.
ILLUSTRATIONS.
Illustrations have been placed as close as practicable to their discussion in the text. The printed page numbers show the original location. Multi-part Figures are sometimes shown vertically (one drawing above the other) where the original layout was horizontal.
Illustrations have been positioned as close as possible to where they are discussed in the text. The printed page numbers indicate their original location. Multi-part figures are sometimes displayed vertically (one drawing above the other) instead of the original horizontal layout.
The Map and most site plans are shown as thumbnails linked to larger versions.
The map and most site plans are displayed as thumbnails linked to larger versions.
Page. | ||
Plate I. | Map of the provinces of Tusayan and Cibola Map of the provinces of Tusayan and Cibola |
12 |
II. | Old Mashongnavi, plan | 14 |
III. | General view of Awatubi | 16 |
IV. | Awatubi (Talla-Hogan), plan | 18 |
V. | Standing walls of Awatubi | 20 |
VI. | Adobe fragment in Awatubi | 22 |
VII. | Horn House ruin, plan | 24 |
VIII. | Bat House | 26 |
IX. | Mishiptonga (Jeditoh) | 28 |
X. | A small ruin near Moen-kopi | 30 |
XI. | Masonry on the outer wall of the Fire-House, detail Masonry on the outside wall of the Fire Station, detail |
32 |
XII. | Chukubi, plan | 34 |
XIII. | Payupki, plan | 36 |
XIV. | General view of Payupki | 38 |
XV. | Standing walls of Payupki | 40 |
XVI. | Plan of Hano | 42 |
XVII. | View of Hano | 44 |
XVIII. | Plan of Sichumovi | 46 |
XIX. | View of Sichumovi | 48 |
XX. | Plan of Walpi | 50 |
XXI. | View of Walpi | 52 |
XXII. | South passageway of Walpi | 54 |
XXIII. | Houses built over irregular sites, Walpi | 56 |
XXIV. | Dance rock and kiva, Walpi | 58 |
XXV. | Foot trail to Walpi | 60 |
XXVI. | Mashongnavi, plan | 62 |
XXVII. | Mashongnavi with Shupaulovi in distance | 64 |
XXVIII. | Back wall of a Mashongnavi house-row | 66 |
XXIX. | West side of a principal row in Mashongnavi West side of a main street in Mashongnavi |
68 |
XXX. | Plan of Shupaulovi | 70 |
XXXI. | View of Shupaulovi | 72 |
XXXII. | A covered passageway of Shupaulovi | 74 |
XXXIII. | The chief kiva of Shupaulovi | 76 |
XXXIV. | Plan of Shumopavi | 78 |
XXXV. | View of Shumopavi | 80 |
XXXVI. | Oraibi, plan | In pocket. |
XXXVII. | Key to the Oraibi plan, also showing localization of gentes Key to the Oraibi plan, also showing the location of groups. |
82 |
XXXVIII. | A court of Oraibi | 84 |
XXXIX. | Masonry terraces of Oraibi | 86 |
XL. | Oraibi house row, showing court side | 88 |
XLI. | Back of Oraibi house row | 90 |
XLII. | The site of Moen-kopi | 92 |
XLIII. | Plan of Moen-kopi | 94 |
XLIV. | Moen-kopi | 96 |
8 XLV. | The Mormon mill at Moen-kopi | 98 |
XLVI. | Hawikuh, plan | 100 |
XLVII. | Hawikuh, view | 102 |
XLVIII. | Adobe church at Hawikuh | 104 |
XLIX. | Ketchipanan, plan | 106 |
L. | Ketchipauan | 108 |
LI. | Stone church at Ketchipauan | 110 |
LII. | K’iakima, plan | 112 |
LIII. | Site of K’iakima, at base of Tâaaiyalana | 114 |
LIV. | Recent wall at K’iakima | 116 |
LV. | Matsaki, plan | 118 |
LVI. | Standing wall at Pinawa | 120 |
LVII. | Halona excavations as seen from Zuñi | 122 |
LVIII. | Fragments of Halona wall | 124 |
LIX. | The mesa of Tâaaiyalana, from Zuñi | 126 |
LX. | Tâaaiyalana, plan | 128 |
LXI. | Standing walls of Tâaaiyalana ruins | 130 |
LXII. | Remains of a reservoir on Tâaaiyalana | 132 |
LXIII. | Kin-tiel, plan (also showing excavations) Kin-tiel, plan (including excavations) |
134 |
LXIV. | North wall of Kin-tiel | 136 |
LXV. | Standing walls of Kin-tiel | 138 |
LXVI. | Kinna-Zinde | 140 |
LXVII. | Nutria, plan | 142 |
LXVIII. | Nutria, view | 144 |
LXIX. | Pescado, plan | 146 |
LXX. | Court view of Pescado, showing corrals | 148 |
LXXI. | Pescado houses | 150 |
LXXII. | Fragments of ancient masonry in Pescado | 152 |
LXXIII. | Ojo Caliente, plan | In pocket. |
LXXIV. | General view of Ojo Caliente | 154 |
LXXV. | House at Ojo Caliente | 156 |
LXXVI. | Zuñi, plan | In pocket. |
LXXVII. | Outline plan of Zuñi, showing distribution of oblique openings Outline plan of Zuñi, showing the layout of slanted openings. |
158 |
LXXVIII. | General inside view of Zuñi, looking west General inside view of Zuñi, looking west |
160 |
LXXIX. | Zuñi terraces | 162 |
LXXX. | Old adobe church of Zuñi | 164 |
LXXXI. | Eastern rows of Zuñi | 166 |
LXXXII. | A Zuñi court | 168 |
LXXXIII. | A Zuñi small house | 170 |
LXXXIV. | A house-building at Oraibi | 172 |
LXXXV. | A Tusayan interior | 174 |
LXXXVI. | A Zuñi interior | 176 |
LXXXVII. | A kiva hatchway of Tusayan | 178 |
LXXXVIII. | North kivas of Shumopavi, from the northeast North kivas of Shumopavi, from the northeast |
180 |
LXXXIX. | Masonry in the north wing of Kin-tiel | 182 |
XC. | Adobe garden walls near Zuñi. | 184 |
XCI. | A group of stone corrals near Oraibi | 186 |
XCII. | An inclosing wall of upright stones at Ojo Caliente An enclosing wall of vertical stones at Ojo Caliente |
188 |
XCIII. | Upright blocks of sandstone built into an ancient pueblo wall Upright blocks of sandstone embedded in an ancient pueblo wall |
190 |
XCIV. | Ancient wall of upright rocks in southwestern Colorado Ancient wall of vertical rocks in southwestern Colorado |
192 |
XCV. | Ancient floor-beams at Kin-tiel | 194 |
XCVI. | Adobe walls in Zuñi | 196 |
XCVII. | Wall coping and oven at Zuñi | 198 |
XCVIII. | Cross-pieces on Zuñi ladders | 200 |
XCIX. | Outside steps at Pescado | 202 |
9 C. | An excavated room at Kin-tiel | 204 |
CI. | Masonry chimneys of Zuñi | 206 |
CII. | Remains of a gateway in Awatubi | 208 |
CIII. | Ancient gateway, Kin-tiel | 210 |
CIV. | A covered passageway in Mashongnavi | 212 |
CV. | Small square openings in Pueblo Bonito | 214 |
CVI. | Sealed openings in a detached house of Nutria Sealed openings in a standalone house in Nutria |
216 |
CVII. | Partial filling-in of a large opening in Oraibi, converting it into a doorway Partial filling of a large opening in Oraibi, turning it into a doorway. |
218 |
CVIII. | Large openings reduced to small windows, Oraibi Large openings reduced to small windows, Oraibi |
220 |
CIX. | Stone corrals and kiva of Mashongnavi | 222 |
CX. | Portion of a corral in Pescado | 224 |
CXI. | Zuñi eagle-cage | 226 |
Fig. 1. | View of the First Mesa | 43 |
2. | Ruins, Old Walpi mound | 47 |
3. | Ruin between Bat House and Horn House | 51 |
4. | Ruin near Moen-kopi, plan | 53 |
5. | Ruin 7 miles north of Oraibi | 55 |
6. | Ruin 14 miles north of Oraibi (Kwaituki) | 56 |
7. | Oval fire-house ruin, plan. (Tebugkihu) | 58 |
8. | Topography of the site of Walpi | 64 |
9. | Mashongnavi and Shupaulovi from Shumopavi Mashongnavi and Shupaulovi from Shumopavi |
66 |
10. | Diagram showing growth of Mashongnavi | 67 |
11. | Diagram showing growth of Mashongnavi | 68 |
12. | Diagram showing growth of Mashongnavi | 69 |
13. | Topography of the site of Shupaulovi | 71 |
14. | Court kiva of Shumopavi | 75 |
15. | Hampassawan, plan | 84 |
16. | Pinawa, plan | 87 |
17. | Nutria, plan; small diagram, old wall | 94 |
18. | Pescado, plan, old wall diagram | 95 |
19. | A Tusayan wood-rack | 103 |
20. | Interior ground plan of a Tusayan room | 108 |
21. | North kivas of Shumopavi from the southwest North kivas of Shumopavi from the southwest |
114 |
22. | Ground plan of the chief-kiva of Shupaulovi Ground plan of the main kiva of Shupaulovi |
122 |
23. | Ceiling-plan of the chief-kiva of Shupaulovi Ceiling plan of the main kiva of Shupaulovi |
123 |
24. | Interior view of a Tusayan kiva | 124 |
25. | Ground-plan of a Shupaulovi kiva | 125 |
26. | Ceiling-plan of a Shupaulovi kiva | 125 |
27. | Ground-plan of the chief-kiva of Mashongnavi Ground plan of the main kiva of Mashongnavi |
126 |
28. | Interior view of a kiva hatchway in Tusayan Interior view of a kiva hatchway in Tusayan |
127 |
29. | Mat used in closing the entrance of Tusayan kivas Mat used to close the entrance of Tusayan kivas |
128 |
30. | Rectangular sipapuh in a Mashongnavi kiva Rectangular sipapu in a Mashongnavi kiva |
131 |
31. | Loom-post in kiva floor at Tusayan | 132 |
32. | A Zuñi chimney showing pottery fragments embedded in its adobe base A Zuñi chimney with pottery pieces set into its adobe base |
139 |
33. | A Zuñi oven with pottery scales embedded in its surface A Zuñi oven with pottery patterns built into its surface |
139 |
34. | Stone wedges of Zuñi masonry exposed in a rain-washed wall Stone wedges of Zuñi masonry revealed in a rain-washed wall |
141 |
35. | An unplastered house wall in Ojo Caliente An unplastered wall of a house in Ojo Caliente |
142 |
36. | Wall decorations in Mashongnavi, executed in pink on a white ground Wall decorations in Mashongnavi, done in pink on a white background |
146 |
37. | Diagram of Zuñi roof construction | 149 |
38. | Showing abutment of smaller roof-beams over round girders Showing the support of smaller roof beams over round girders |
151 |
39. | Single stone roof-drains | 153 |
40. | Trough roof-drains of stone | 153 |
10 41. | Wooden roof-drains | 154 |
42. | Curved roof-drains of stone in Tusayan | 154 |
43. | Tusayan roof-drains; a discarded metate and a gourd Tusayan roof drains; a thrown-away metate and a gourd |
155 |
44. | Zuñi roof-drain, with splash-stones on roof below Zuñi roof drain, with splash stones on the roof below |
156 |
45. | A modern notched ladder in Oraibi | 157 |
46. | Tusayan notched ladders from Mashongnavi | 157 |
47. | Aboriginal American forms of ladder | 158 |
48. | Stone steps at Oraibi with platform at corner Stone steps at Oraibi with a platform at the corner |
161 |
49. | Stone steps, with platform at chimney, in Oraibi Stone steps with a platform at the chimney in Oraibi. |
161 |
50. | Stone steps in Shumopavi | 162 |
51. | A series of cooking pits in Mashongnavi | 163 |
52. | Pi-gummi ovens of Mashongnavi | 163 |
53. | Cross sections of pi-gummi ovens of Mashongnavi Cross sections of pi-gummi ovens from Mashongnavi |
163 |
54. | Diagrams showing foundation stones of a Zuñi oven Diagrams showing the foundation stones of a Zuñi oven |
164 |
55. | Dome-shaped oven on a plinth of masonry | 165 |
56. | Oven in Pescado exposing stones of masonry Oven in Pescado revealing masonry stones |
166 |
57. | Oven in Pescado exposing stones of masonry Oven in Pescado showing masonry stones |
166 |
58. | Shrines in Mashongnavi | 167 |
59. | A poultry house in Sichumovi resembling an oven A chicken coop in Sichumovi that looks like an oven |
167 |
60. | Ground-plan of an excavated room in Kin-tiel Ground plan of an excavated room in Kin-tiel |
168 |
61. | A corner chimney-hood with two supporting poles, Tusayan A corner chimney hood with two support poles, Tusayan |
170 |
62. | A curved chimney-hood of Mashongnavi | 170 |
63. | A Mashongnavi chimney-hood and walled-up fireplace A Mashongnavi chimney hood and sealed fireplace |
171 |
64. | A chimney-hood of Shupaulovi | 172 |
65. | A semi-detached square chimney-hood of Zuñi A semi-detached square chimney hood from Zuñi |
172 |
66. | Unplastered Zuñi chimney-hoods, illustrating construction Unplastered Zuñi chimney hoods, illustrating construction |
173 |
67. | A fireplace and mantel in Sichumovi | 174 |
68. | A second-story fireplace in Mashongnavi | 174 |
69. | Piki stone and chimney-hood in Sichumovi | 175 |
70. | Piki stone and primitive andiron in Shumopavi Piki stone and basic andiron in Shumopavi |
176 |
71. | A terrace fireplace and chimney of Shumopavi A terrace fireplace and chimney of Shumopavi |
177 |
72. | A terrace cooking-pit and chimney of Walpi A terrace cooking pit and chimney of Walpi |
177 |
73. | A ground cooking-pit of Shumopavi covered with a chimney A ground cooking pit at Shumopavi covered with a chimney. |
178 |
74. | Tusayan chimneys | 179 |
75. | A barred Zuñi door | 183 |
76. | Wooden pivot hinges of a Zuñi door | 184 |
77. | Paneled wooden doors in Hano | 185 |
78. | Framing of a Zuñi door panel | 186 |
79. | Rude transoms over Tusayan openings | 188 |
80. | A large Tusayan doorway, with small transom openings A big Tusayan doorway, featuring small transom openings |
189 |
81. | A doorway and double transom in Walpi | 189 |
82. | An ancient doorway in a Canyon de Chelly cliff ruin An ancient doorway in a Canyon de Chelly cliff ruin |
190 |
83. | A symmetrical notched doorway in Mashongnavi A symmetrical notched doorway in Mashongnavi |
190 |
84. | A Tusayan notched doorway | 191 |
85. | A large Tusayan doorway with one notched jamb A big Tusayan doorway with one notched side |
192 |
86. | An ancient circular doorway, or “stone-close,” in Kin-tiel An ancient circular doorway, or "stone-close," in Kin-tiel |
193 |
87. | Diagram illustrating symmetrical arrangement of small openings in Pueblo Bonito Diagram illustrating symmetrical arrangement of small openings in Pueblo Bonito |
195 |
88. | Incised decoration on a rude window-sash in Zuñi Incised decoration on a rough window frame in Zuñi |
196 |
89. | Sloping selenite window at base of Zuñi wall on upper terrace Sloping selenite window at the base of the Zuñi wall on the upper terrace |
197 |
90. | A Zuñi window glazed with selenite | 197 |
91. | Small openings in the back wall of a Zuñi house cluster. Small openings in the back wall of a Zuñi house cluster. |
198 |
92. | Sealed openings in Tusayan | 199 |
93. | A Zuñi doorway converted into a window | 201 |
94. | Zuñi roof-openings | 202 |
11 95. | A Zuñi roof-opening with raised coping | 203 |
96. | Zuñi roof-openings with one raised end | 203 |
97. | A Zuñi roof-hole with cover | 204 |
98. | Kiva trap-door in Zuñi | 205 |
99. | Halved and pinned trap-door frame of a Zuñi kiva Halved and pinned trap-door frame of a Zuñi kiva |
206 |
100. | Typical sections of Zuñi oblique openings Typical sections of Zuñi angled openings |
208 |
101. | Arrangement of mealing stones in a Tusayan house Arrangement of grinding stones in a Tusayan home |
209 |
102. | A Tusayan grain bin | 210 |
103. | A Zuñi plume-box | 210 |
104. | A Zuñi plume-box | 210 |
105. | A Tusayan mealing trough | 211 |
106. | An ancient pueblo form of metate | 211 |
107. | Zuñi stools | 213 |
108. | A Zuñi chair | 213 |
109. | Construction of a Zuñi corral | 215 |
110. | Gardens of Zuñi | 216 |
111. | “Kishoni,” or uncovered shade, of Tusayan | 218 |
112. | A Tusayan field shelter, from southwest | 219 |
113. | A Tusayan field shelter, from northeast | 219 |
114. | Diagram showing ideal section of terraces, with Tusayan names Diagram showing ideal section of terraces, with Tusayan names |
223 |
full size
Plate I.
General Map of the Pueblo Region
of Arizona and New Mexico,
Showing Relative Position of the Provinces
of Tusayan and Cibola.
by
Victor Mindeleff.
full size
Plate I.
General Map of the Pueblo Region
of Arizona and New Mexico,
Showing the Locations of the Provinces
of Tusayan and Cibola.
by
Victor Mindeleff.
A STUDY OF PUEBLO ARCHITECTURE
IN TUSAYAN AND CIBOLA.
By Victor Mindeleff.
INTRODUCTION.
The remains of pueblo architecture are found scattered over thousands of square miles of the arid region of the southwestern plateaus. This vast area includes the drainage of the Rio Pecos on the east and that of the Colorado on the west, and extends from central Utah on the north beyond the limits of the United States southward, in which direction its boundaries are still undefined.
The remnants of pueblo architecture are found spread out over thousands of square miles in the dry region of the southwestern plateaus. This extensive area includes the drainage of the Rio Pecos to the east and the Colorado River to the west, and it stretches from central Utah in the north all the way beyond the southern borders of the United States, where its boundaries are still not clearly defined.
The descendants of those who at various times built these stone villages are few in number and inhabit about thirty pueblos distributed irregularly over parts of the region formerly occupied. Of these the greater number are scattered along the upper course of the Rio Grande and its tributaries in New Mexico; a few of them, comprised within the ancient provinces of Cibola and Tusayan, are located within the drainage of the Little Colorado. From the time of the earliest Spanish expeditions into the country to the present day, a period covering more than three centuries, the former province has been often visited by whites, but the remoteness of Tusayan and the arid and forbidding character of its surroundings have caused its more complete isolation. The architecture of this district exhibits a close adherence to aboriginal practices, still bears the marked impress of its development under the exacting conditions of an arid environment, and is but slowly yielding to the influence of foreign ideas.
The descendants of those who built these stone villages at different times are few and live in about thirty pueblos scattered across parts of the region they once occupied. Most of them are spread along the upper part of the Rio Grande and its tributaries in New Mexico; a few are located within the ancient areas of Cibola and Tusayan, near the drainage of the Little Colorado. Since the earliest Spanish expeditions to this area over three centuries ago, the former province has been frequently visited by outsiders, but the remoteness of Tusayan and the dry, harsh nature of its surroundings have led to its greater isolation. The architecture in this area closely follows traditional practices, still reflects its development under the tough conditions of a dry environment, and is slowly adapting to outside influences.
The present study of the architecture of Tusayan and Cibola embraces all of the inhabited pueblos of those provinces, and includes a number of the ruins traditionally connected with them. It will be observed by reference to the map that the area embraced in these provinces comprises but a small portion of the vast region over which pueblo culture once extended.
The current study of the architecture of Tusayan and Cibola covers all the inhabited pueblos in those areas and includes several ruins that are traditionally linked to them. If you look at the map, you'll see that the area covered by these provinces is just a small part of the large region that pueblo culture once spanned.
This study is designed to be followed by a similar study of two typical groups of ruins, viz, that of Canyon de Chelly, in northeastern Arizona, and that of the Chaco Canyon, of New Mexico; but it has been necessary for the writer to make occasional reference to these ruins in the present 14 paper, both in the discussion of general arrangement and characteristic ground plans, embodied in Chapters II and III and in the comparison by constructional details treated in Chapter IV, in order to define clearly the relations of the various features of pueblo architecture. They belong to the same pueblo system illustrated by the villages of Tusayan and Cibola, and with the Canyon de Chelly group there is even some trace of traditional connection, as is set forth by Mr. Stephen in Chapter I. The more detailed studies of these ruins, to be published later, together with the material embodied in the present paper, will, it is thought, furnish a record of the principal characteristics of an important type of primitive architecture, which, under the influence of the arid environment of the southwestern plateaus, has developed from the rude lodge into the many-storied house of rectangular rooms. Indications of some of the steps of this development are traceable even in the architecture of the present day.
This study is intended to be followed by a similar one that looks at two typical groups of ruins: Canyon de Chelly in northeastern Arizona and Chaco Canyon in New Mexico. However, it's been necessary for me to reference these ruins throughout this paper, especially in the discussion of general layout and distinct ground plans covered in Chapters II and III, as well as in the comparison of construction details discussed in Chapter IV. This is to clearly outline the relationships of various features of pueblo architecture. These structures are part of the same pueblo system seen in the villages of Tusayan and Cibola, and with the Canyon de Chelly group, there's even some evidence of a traditional connection, as noted by Mr. Stephen in Chapter I. The more detailed studies of these ruins will be published later, along with the material in this paper, and it is believed that together they will provide a record of the key characteristics of an important type of primitive architecture. This architecture has evolved from simple lodges into multi-storied houses with rectangular rooms under the challenges of the arid southwestern plateau environment. Signs of the steps in this development can even be seen in modern architecture.
The pueblo of Zuñi was surveyed by the writer in the autumn of 1881 with a view to procuring the necessary data for the construction of a large-scale model of this pueblo. For this reason the work afforded a record of external features only.
The Zuñi village was surveyed by the author in the fall of 1881 to gather the needed information for creating a large-scale model of this village. Because of this, the work only provided a record of external features.
The modern pueblos of Tusayan were similarly surveyed in the following season (1882-’83), the plans being supplemented by photographs, from which many of the illustrations accompanying this paper have been drawn. The ruin of Awatubi was also included in the work of this season.
The modern pueblos of Tusayan were also surveyed in the following season (1882-’83), and the plans were enhanced with photographs that provided many of the illustrations in this paper. The ruins of Awatubi were also part of the work that season.
In the autumn of 1885 many of the ruined pueblos of Tusayan were surveyed and examined. It was during this season’s work that the details of the kiva construction, embodied in the last chapter of this paper, were studied, together with interior details of the dwellings. It was in the latter part of this season that the farming pueblos of Cibola were surveyed and photographed.
In the fall of 1885, many of the ruined pueblos of Tusayan were surveyed and examined. It was during this season's work that the details of kiva construction, discussed in the last chapter of this paper, were studied, along with the interior details of the homes. It was in the later part of this season that the farming pueblos of Cibola were surveyed and photographed.
The Tusayan farming pueblo of Moen-kopi and a number of the ruins in the province were surveyed and studied in the early part of the season of 1887-’88, the latter portion of which season was principally devoted to an examination of the Chaco ruins in New Mexico.
The Tusayan farming community of Moen-kopi and several of the ruins in the area were surveyed and studied in the early part of the 1887-’88 season, while the latter part of that season was mainly focused on examining the Chaco ruins in New Mexico.
In the prosecution of the field work above outlined the author has been greatly indebted to the efficient assistance and hearty cooperation of Mr. Cosmos Mindeleff, by whom nearly all the pueblos illustrated, with the exception of Zuñi, have been surveyed and platted.
In carrying out the fieldwork mentioned above, the author has been extremely grateful for the effective help and enthusiastic cooperation of Mr. Cosmos Mindeleff, who has surveyed and mapped nearly all the pueblos illustrated, except for Zuñi.
The plans obtained have involved much careful work with surveying instruments, and have all been so platted as faithfully to record the minute variations from geometric forms which are so characteristic of the pueblo work, but which have usually been ignored in the hastily prepared sketch plans that have at times appeared. In consequence of the necessary omission of just such information in hastily drawn plans, erroneous impressions have been given regarding the degree of skill to which the pueblo peoples had attained in the planning and building of 15 their villages. In the general distribution of the houses, and in the alignment and arrangement of their walls, as indicated in the plans shown in Chapters II and III, an absence of high architectural attainment is found, which is entirely in keeping with the lack of skill apparent in many of the constructional devices shown in Chapter IV.
The plans we've obtained involved a lot of detailed work with surveying tools, and they've all been carefully designed to accurately capture the subtle deviations from geometric shapes that are typical of pueblo architecture, which have often been overlooked in the quickly made sketch plans that have occasionally been published. As a result of skipping this crucial information in hasty plans, people have developed incorrect perceptions about the level of skill the pueblo communities achieved in planning and constructing their villages. In the overall layout of the houses, and in the alignment and arrangement of their walls, as shown in the plans in Chapters II and III, there's a noticeable lack of advanced architectural skill, which aligns with the limited techniques evident in many of the building methods presented in Chapter IV.
Plate II. Old Mashongnavi, plan.
Plate II. Old Mashongnavi, layout.
In preparing this paper for publication Mr. Cosmos Mindeleff has rendered much assistance in the revision of manuscript, and in the preparation of some of the final drawings of ground plans; on him has also fallen the compilation and arrangement of Mr. A. M. Stephen’s traditionary material from Tusayan, embraced in the first chapter of the paper.
In getting this paper ready for publication, Mr. Cosmos Mindeleff provided significant help with revising the manuscript and in creating some of the final drawings of the ground plans. He also took on the responsibility of compiling and organizing Mr. A. M. Stephen’s traditional material from Tusayan, which is included in the first chapter of the paper.
This latter material is of special interest in a study of the pueblos as indicating some of the conditions under which this architectural type was developed, and it appropriately introduces the more purely architectural study by the author.
This later material is especially important in studying the pueblos, as it shows some of the conditions under which this architectural style was developed, and it smoothly leads into the author's more focused architectural study.
Such traditions must be used as history with the utmost caution, and only for events that are very recent. Time relations are often hopelessly confused and the narratives are greatly incumbered with mythologic details. But while so barren in definite information, these traditions are of the greatest value, often through their merely incidental allusions, in presenting to our minds a picture of the conditions under which the repeated migrations of the pueblo builders took place.
Such traditions should be treated as history with great care, and only for very recent events. Time relationships are often completely mixed up, and the stories are heavily filled with mythological details. However, while they lack specific information, these traditions are extremely valuable, often providing us with a glimpse of the conditions surrounding the repeated migrations of the pueblo builders through their incidental references.
The development of architecture among the Pueblo Indians was comparatively rapid and is largely attributable to frequent changes, migrations, and movements of the people as described in Mr. Stephen’s account. These changes were due to a variety of causes, such as disease, death, the frequent warfare carried on between different tribes and branches of the builders, and the hostility of outside tribes; but a most potent factor was certainly the inhospitable character of their environment. The disappearance of some venerated spring during an unusually dry season would be taken as a sign of the disfavor of the gods, and, in spite of the massive character of the buildings, would lead to the migration of the people to a more favorable spot. The traditions of the Zuñis, as well as those of the Tusayan, frequently refer to such migrations. At times tribes split up and separate, and again phratries or distant groups meet and band together. It is remarkable that the substantial character of the architecture should persist through such long series of compulsory removals, but while the builders were held together by the necessity for defense against their wilder neighbors or against each other, this strong defensive motive would perpetuate the laborious type of construction. Such conditions would contribute to the rapid development of the building art.
The development of architecture among the Pueblo Indians happened relatively quickly and is mainly due to the frequent changes, migrations, and movements of the people as described in Mr. Stephen’s account. These changes resulted from various factors, including disease, death, ongoing warfare between different tribes and groups of builders, and the hostility of outside tribes; however, a significant factor was definitely the harsh nature of their environment. The loss of a respected spring during an unusually dry season would be seen as a sign of the gods' disfavor and, despite the monumental nature of their buildings, could lead to people migrating to a better location. The traditions of the Zuñis, as well as those of the Tusayan, often mention these migrations. Sometimes tribes would split up and separate, while at other times, groups or distant factions would come together and unite. It’s notable that the strength of the architecture has endured through such a long series of forced relocations; while the builders were united by the need for defense against their wilder neighbors or even among themselves, this strong defensive need would continue the demanding type of construction. These conditions contributed to the rapid growth of architectural skills.
CHAPTER I.
TRADITIONAL HISTORY OF TUSAYAN.
EXPLANATORY.
In this chapter1 is presented a summary of the traditions of the Tusayan, a number of which were collected from old men, from Walpi on the east to Moen-kopi on the west. A tradition varies much with the tribe and the individual; an authoritative statement of the current tradition on any point could be made only with a complete knowledge of all traditions extant. Such knowledge is not possessed by any one man, and the material included in this chapter is presented simply as a summary of the traditions secured.
In this chapter1 is a summary of the traditions of the Tusayan, many of which were collected from elders, ranging from Walpi in the east to Moen-kopi in the west. Traditions can vary significantly among tribes and individuals; an authoritative account of the current tradition on any topic could be made only with full knowledge of all existing traditions. No single person has that complete knowledge, and the material presented in this chapter is simply a summary of the traditions gathered.
The material was collected by Mr. A. M. Stephen, of Keam’s Canyon, Arizona, who has enjoyed unusual facilities for the work, having lived for a number of years past in Tusayan and possessed the confidence of the principal priests—a very necessary condition in work of this character. Though far from complete, this summary is a more comprehensive presentation of the traditionary history of these people than has heretofore been published.
The material was gathered by Mr. A. M. Stephen from Keam’s Canyon, Arizona, who had unique advantages for this task, as he has lived in Tusayan for several years and earned the trust of the main priests—a crucial factor for work like this. While it's not fully complete, this summary provides a more thorough overview of the traditional history of these people than what has been published before.
SUMMARY OF TRADITIONS.
The creation myths of the Tusayan differ widely, but none of them designate the region now occupied as the place of their genesis. These people are socially divided into family groups called wi´ngwu, the descendants of sisters, and groups of wi´ngwu tracing descent from the same female ancestor, and having a common totem called my´umu. Each of these totemic groups preserves a creation myth, carrying in its details special reference to themselves; but all of them claim a common origin in the interior of the earth, although the place of emergence to the surface is set in widely separated localities. They all agree in maintaining this to be the fourth plane on which mankind has existed. In the beginning all men lived together in the lowest depths, in a region of darkness and moisture; their bodies were misshaped and horrible, and they suffered great misery, moaning and bewailing continually. Through the intervention of Myúingwa (a vague conception known as the god of the interior) and of Baholikonga (a crested serpent of enormous size, the genius of water), the “old men” obtained a seed from which sprang a magic growth of cane. It penetrated through a crevice 17 in the roof overhead and mankind climbed to a higher plane. A dim light appeared in this stage and vegetation was produced. Another magic growth of cane afforded the means of rising to a still higher plane on which the light was brighter; vegetation was reproduced and the animal kingdom was created. The final ascent to this present, or fourth plane, was effected by similar magic growths and was led by mythic twins, according to some of the myths, by climbing a great pine tree, in others by climbing the cane, Phragmites communis, the alternate leaves of which afforded steps as of a ladder, and in still others it is said to have been a rush, through the interior of which the people passed up to the surface. The twins sang as they pulled the people out, and when their song was ended no more were allowed to come; and hence, many more were left below than were permitted to come above; but the outlet through which mankind came has never been closed, and Myu´ingwa sends through it the germs of all living things. It is still symbolized by the peculiar construction of the hatchway of the kiva and in the designs on the sand altars in these underground chambers, by the unconnected circle painted on pottery and by devices on basketry and other textile fabrics.
The creation myths of the Tusayan vary greatly, but none of them identify the current region as the site of their origin. These people are socially organized into family groups called wi´ngwu, which are descendants of sisters, and groups of wi´ngwu that trace their lineage from the same female ancestor, all having a common totem called my´umu. Each of these totemic groups has its own creation myth, which specifically refers to them, but they all claim a shared origin from the depths of the earth, even though the exit point to the surface is mentioned in different locations. They all agree that this is the fourth level where humanity has existed. In the beginning, all humans lived together in the deepest darkness and moisture, with twisted and frightening bodies, and they endured great suffering, constantly moaning and lamenting. Through the intervention of Myúingwa (a vague concept referred to as the god of the interior) and Baholikonga (a huge crested serpent, the spirit of water), the “old men” received a seed that grew into magical cane. This cane broke through a crack in the ceiling above, allowing humanity to climb to a higher level. A faint light appeared at this stage and plants began to grow. Another magical cane allowed them to ascend to an even higher level where the light was brighter; plants grew again and animals came into being. The final ascent to this current fourth level was achieved through similar magical canes and was led by mythical twins, who, according to some tales, climbed a huge pine tree, while others say they climbed the cane, Phragmites communis, whose alternating leaves acted like ladder steps, and in other accounts, it was a rush that allowed the people to ascend to the surface. The twins sang as they lifted the people out, and once their song ended, no more were allowed to come; thus, many were left behind compared to those who ascended. However, the passage through which humanity emerged has never been sealed, and Myu´ingwa sends the seeds of all living things through it. This is still represented by the unique design of the hatchway in the kiva and in the patterns on the sand altars in these underground chambers, by the unconnected circle painted on pottery, and by patterns on basketry and other woven fabrics.
Plate III. General view of Awatubi.
Plate III. Overview of Awatubi.
All the people that were permitted to come to the surface were collected and the different families of men were arranged together. This was done under the direction of twins, who are called Pekónghoya, the younger one being distinguished by the term Balíngahoya, the Echo. They were assisted by their grandmother, Kóhkyang wúhti, the Spider woman, and these appear in varying guises in many of the myths and legends. They instructed the people in divers modes of life to dwell on mountain or on plain, to build lodges, or huts, or windbreaks. They distributed appropriate gifts among them and assigned each a pathway, and so the various families of mankind were dispersed over the earth’s surface.
All the people allowed to come to the surface were gathered together and organized into different family groups. This was overseen by twins known as Pekónghoya, with the younger one referred to as Balíngahoya, the Echo. They were helped by their grandmother, Kóhkyang wúhti, the Spider woman, who appears in various forms in many myths and legends. They taught the people different ways of life, whether to live in the mountains or plains, to build lodges, huts, or windbreaks. They handed out suitable gifts to everyone and assigned each group a pathway, and thus the various families of humanity were spread across the earth.
The Hopituh,2 after being taught to build stone houses, were also divided, and the different divisions took separate paths. The legends indicate a long period of extensive migrations in separate communities; the groups came to Tusayan at different times and from different directions, but the people of all the villages concur in designating the Snake people as the first occupants of the region. The eldest member of that nyumu tells a curious legend of their migration from which the following is quoted:
The Hopituh,2 after learning to build stone houses, were also divided, and the different groups took separate paths. The legends suggest a long period of extensive migrations in isolated communities; the groups arrived in Tusayan at various times and from different directions, but all the villagers agree that the Snake people were the first inhabitants of the area. The oldest member of that nyumu shares an intriguing legend about their migration, from which the following is quoted:
During the general dispersal, my people lived in snake skins, with each family in its own snake skin bag, all hung from the end of a rainbow that swung around until it touched Navajo Mountain, dropping the bags along the way. Wherever a bag landed, there was their home. After arranging their bags, they emerged as men and women, and then built a stone house with five sides. [This story recounts the adventures of a mythic Snake Youth, who returned with a strange woman who gave birth to rattlesnakes; these snakes bit the people and forced them to migrate.] A bright star appeared in the southeast, shining for a while before disappearing. The elders said, “There must be people beneath that star,” so they decided to travel toward it. They cut a staff, planted it in the ground, and watched until the star reached its highest point, then they set off, traveling as long as the star shone. When it went out, they stopped. But the star didn’t shine every night; sometimes years passed before it appeared again. During those times, our people built houses; they constructed both round and square homes, and the ruins between here and Navajo Mountain mark where our people lived. They waited until the star came to the top of the staff again, then moved on, though many stayed behind in their houses and joined later at different times. When our people reached Wipho (a spring a few miles north of Walpi), the star disappeared and has not been seen since. They built a house there, and after a while, Másauwu (the god of the face of the earth) came and compelled them to move further down the valley, to a spot about halfway between East and Middle Mesa, where they remained for many plantings. One time, the elders gathered, and Másauwu appeared among them, looking like a terrifying skeleton, rattling his bones ominously. He threatened them with menacing gestures, lifted off his fleshless head, and thrust it into their faces, but he couldn't scare them. So he said, “I have lost my wager; everything I have is yours; ask for anything you want, and I will give it to you.” At that time, our people’s home was beside the watercourse, and Másauwu said, “Why are you sitting here in the mud? Go up there where it’s dry.” So they crossed to the low, sandy terrace on the west side of the mesa, near the point, and built a house to live there. Again, the elders gathered, and two demons came among them, but the elders took the great Baho and the nwelas and chased them away. As they were returning, not far north of their village, they met the Lenbaki (Cane-Flute, a religious society still maintained) of the Horn family. The elders wouldn’t let them enter until Másauwu showed up and declared them to be good Hopituh. They built houses next to ours, creating a large, vibrant village. Then other Hopituh came in over time, and our people would say, “Build here or build there,” dividing the land among the newcomers.
The site of the first Snake house in the valley, mentioned in the foregoing legend, is now barely to be discerned, and the people refuse to point out the exact spot. It is held as a place of votive offerings during the ceremony of the Snake dance, and, as its name, Bátni, implies, certain rain-fetiches are deposited there in small jars buried in the ground. The site of the village next occupied can be quite easily distinguished, and is now called Kwetcap tutwi, ash heap terrace, and this was the village to which the name Walpi was first applied—a term meaning the place at the notched mesa, in allusion to a broad gap in the stratum of sandstone on the summit of the mesa, and by which it can be distinguished from a great distance. The ground plan of this early Walpi can still be partly traced, indicating the former existence of an extensive village of clustering, little-roomed houses, with thick walls constructed of small stones.
The location of the first Snake house in the valley, as mentioned in the previous legend, is now barely recognizable, and the locals refuse to identify the exact spot. It is regarded as a site for offerings during the Snake dance ceremony, and, as its name, Bátni, suggests, certain rain fetishes are placed there in small jars buried in the ground. The site of the next village is easy to identify and is now called Kwetcap tutwi, which translates to ash heap terrace. This was the village to which the name Walpi was first assigned—a term meaning the place at the notched mesa, referring to a wide gap in the sandstone layer at the top of the mesa, making it distinguishable from afar. The layout of this early Walpi can still be partially traced, showing the previous existence of a large village filled with clustered, small homes built with thick walls made of small stones.
The advent of the Lenbaki is still commemorated by a biennial ceremony, and is celebrated on the year alternating with their other biennial ceremony, the Snake dance.
The arrival of the Lenbaki is still marked by a biennial ceremony, celebrated in the year that alternates with their other biennial event, the Snake dance.
The Horn people, to which the Lenbaki belonged, have a legend of coming from a mountain range in the east.
The Horn people, to which the Lenbaki belonged, have a legend of coming from a mountain range in the east.
Its peaks were always covered in snow, and the trees were always green. From the hillside, you could see the plains where deer, antelope, and bison roamed, feeding on the ever-abundant grasses. Bright streams wound through these plains, lovely to behold. It was a place that only those from our people could access.
This description suggests some region of the head-waters of the Rio Grande. Like the Snake people, they tell of a protracted migration, not of continuous travel, for they remained for many seasons in one place, where they would plant and build permanent houses. One of these halting places is described as a canyon with high, steep walls, in which was a flowing stream; this, it is said, was the Tségi (the Navajo name for Canyon de Chelly). Here they built a large house in a cavernous recess, high up in the canyon wall. They tell of devoting two years3 to ladder making and cutting and pecking shallow holes up the steep rocky side by which to mount to the cavern, and three years more were employed in building the house. While this work was in progress part of the men were planting gardens, and the women and children were gathering stones. But no adequate reason is given for thus toiling to fit this impracticable site for occupation; the footprints of Másauwu, which they were following, led them there.
This description points to an area in the headwaters of the Rio Grande. Similar to the Snake people, they recount a long migration, not a continuous journey, as they spent many seasons in one location where they planted crops and built permanent homes. One of these stopping points is described as a canyon with tall, steep walls and a flowing stream; this is referred to as the Tségi (the Navajo name for Canyon de Chelly). Here, they built a large house in a cave-like recess high up in the canyon wall. They mention spending two years making ladders and carving shallow holes into the steep, rocky side to access the cavern, and another three years constructing the house. While this work was ongoing, some of the men were planting gardens, and the women and children were collecting stones. However, no clear reason is provided for the effort to make this difficult location habitable; they were simply following the footprints of Másauwu that led them there.
The legend goes on to tell that after they had lived there for a long time a stranger happened to stray in their vicinity, who proved to be a Hopituh, and said that he lived in the south. After some stay he left and was accompanied by a party of the “Horn,” who were to visit the land occupied by their kindred Hopituh and return with an account of them; but they never came back. After waiting a long time another band was sent, who returned and said that the first emissaries had found wives and had built houses on the brink of a beautiful canyon, not far from the other Hopituh dwellings. After this many of the Horns grew dissatisfied with their cavern home, dissensions arose, they left their home, and finally they reached Tusayan. They lived at first in one of the canyons east of the villages, in the vicinity of Keam’s Canyon, and some of the numerous ruins on its brink mark the sites of their early houses. There seems to be no legend distinctly attaching any particular ruin to the Horn people, although there is little doubt that the Snake and the Horn were the two first peoples who came to the neighborhood of the present villages. The Bear people were the next, but they arrived as separate branches, and from opposite directions, although of the same Hopituh stock. It has been impossible to obtain directly the legend of the Bears from the west. The story of the Bears from the east tells of encountering the Fire people, then living about 25 miles east from Walpi; but these are now extinct, and nearly all that is known of them is told in the Bear legend, the gist of which is as follows:
The legend continues that after they had lived there for a long time, a stranger wandered into their area. He turned out to be a Hopituh and mentioned that he lived in the south. After a while, he left, accompanied by a group from the “Horn,” who were going to visit the land occupied by their Hopituh relatives and then return with news about them; however, they never came back. After waiting a long time, another group was sent out. They returned and reported that the first group had found wives and built homes on the edge of a beautiful canyon, not far from the other Hopituh communities. Following this, many members of the Horns became unhappy with their cave dwelling, conflicts arose, and they left their home, eventually reaching Tusayan. They initially settled in one of the canyons east of the villages, around Keam’s Canyon, and some of the many ruins along its edge mark the locations of their early homes. There doesn't seem to be any legend clearly linking a specific ruin to the Horn people, though it's likely that the Snake and the Horn were the first two groups to arrive in the area of the current villages. The Bear people arrived next, but they came as separate branches from opposite directions, although from the same Hopituh lineage. It has been difficult to get the legend of the Bears from the west directly. The eastern version of the Bear legend speaks of an encounter with the Fire people, who were living about 25 miles east of Walpi at that time; however, these people are now extinct, and nearly everything known about them is recounted in the Bear legend, the essence of which is as follows:
The Bears originally lived among the mountains of the east, not far distant from the Horns. Continual quarrels with neighboring villages 20 brought on actual fighting, and the Bears left that region and traveled westward. As with all the other people, they halted, built houses, and planted, remaining stationary for a long while; this occurred at different places along their route.
The Bears initially lived in the eastern mountains, not too far from the Horns. Ongoing conflicts with nearby villages led to actual fights, causing the Bears to leave that area and head west. Like all the other tribes, they stopped, built homes, and farmed, staying in one place for quite some time; this happened at various spots along their journey. 20
A portion of these people had wings, and they flew in advance to survey the land, and when the main body were traversing an arid region they found water for them. Another portion had claws with which they dug edible roots, and they could also use them for scratching hand and foot holes in the face of a steep cliff. Others had hoofs, and these carried the heaviest burdens; and some had balls of magic spider web, which they could use on occasion for ropes, and they could also spread the web and use it as a mantle, rendering the wearer invisible when he apprehended danger.
A part of these people had wings, and they flew ahead to scout the land. When the main group was crossing a dry area, they found water for them. Another group had claws that they used to dig up edible roots, and they could also use them to create hand and foot holds in the face of a steep cliff. Others had hooves, and they carried the heaviest loads; some had magic spider silk balls that they could use as ropes when needed, and they could also spread the silk out to create a cloak, making the wearer invisible when they sensed danger.
They too came to the Tségi (Canyon de Chelly), where they found houses but no people, and they also built houses there. While living there a rupture occurred, a portion of them separating and going far to the westward. These seceding bands are probably that branch of the Bears who claim their origin in the west. Some time after this, but how long after is not known, a plague visited the canyon, and the greater portion of the people moved away, but leaving numbers who chose to remain. They crossed the Chinli valley and halted for a short time at a place a short distance northeast from Great Willow water (“Eighteen Mile Spring”). They did not remain there long, however, but moved a few miles farther west, to a place occupied by the Fire people who lived in a large oval house. The ruin of this house still stands, the walls from 5 to 8 feet high, and remarkable from the large-sized blocks of stone used in their construction; it is still known to the Hopituh as Tebvwúki, the Fire-house. Here some fighting occurred, and the Bears moved westward again to the head of Antelope (Jeditoh) Canyon, about 4 miles from Keam’s Canyon and about 15 miles east from Walpi. They built there a rambling cluster of small-roomed houses, of which the ground plan has now become almost obliterated. This ruin is called by the Hopituh “the ruin at the place of wild gourds.” They seem to have occupied this neighborhood for a considerable period, as mention is made of two or three segregations, when groups of families moved a few miles away and built similar house clusters on the brink of that canyon.
They also arrived at Tségi (Canyon de Chelly), where they found houses but no people, and they built houses there as well. While living there, a split happened, with some of them leaving to go far west. These departing groups are likely the branch of the Bears that say they come from the west. Some time later, although it's unclear how long after, a plague hit the canyon, causing most of the people to leave, but some chose to stay. They crossed the Chinli Valley and paused briefly at a spot a little northeast of Great Willow Water (“Eighteen Mile Spring”). They didn’t stay there long, though, and moved a few miles further west to a location occupied by the Fire people, who lived in a large oval house. The ruins of this house still exist, with walls standing 5 to 8 feet high, made of impressively large stone blocks; it is still referred to by the Hopituh as Tebvwúki, the Fire-house. Some conflict occurred here, prompting the Bears to move west again to the head of Antelope (Jeditoh) Canyon, about 4 miles from Keam’s Canyon and roughly 15 miles east of Walpi. They constructed a sprawling cluster of small roomed houses there, but the ground plan has now nearly disappeared. This ruin is called by the Hopituh “the ruin at the place of wild gourds.” They appeared to have occupied this area for a significant amount of time, as there are records of two or three separations, where groups of families moved a few miles away to build similar house clusters on the edge of that canyon.
The Fire-people, who, some say, were of the Horn people, must have abandoned their dwelling at the Oval House or must have been driven out at the time of their conflict with the Bears, and seem to have traveled directly to the neighborhood of Walpi. The Snakes allotted them a place to build in the valley on the east side of the mesa, and about two miles north from the gap. A ridge of rocky knolls and sand dunes lies at the foot of the mesa here, and close to the main cliff is a spring. There are two prominent knolls about 400 yards apart and the summits of these are covered with traces of house walls; also portions of walls can be discerned on all the intervening hummocks. The place is known as Sikyátki, 21 the yellow-house, from the color of the sandstone of which the houses were built. These and other fragmentary bits have walls not over a foot thick, built of small stones dressed by rubbing, and all laid in mud; the inside of the walls also show a smooth coating of mud plaster. The dimensions of the rooms are very small, the largest measuring 9½ feet long, by 4½ feet wide. It is improbable that any of these structures were over two stories high, and many of them were built in excavated places around the rocky summits of the knolls. In these instances no rear wall was built; the partition walls, radiating at irregular angles, abut against the rock itself. Still, the great numbers of these houses, small as they were, must have been far more than the Fire-people could have required, for the oval house which they abandoned measures not more than a hundred feet by fifty. Probably other incoming gentes, of whom no story has been preserved, had also the ill fate to build there, for the Walpi people afterward slew all its inhabitants.
The Fire-people, who some believe were related to the Horn people, must have left their home at the Oval House or been forced out during their conflict with the Bears. They seemed to have traveled straight to the area near Walpi. The Snakes provided them with a spot to build in the valley on the east side of the mesa, about two miles north of the gap. A ridge of rocky knolls and sand dunes is at the foot of the mesa here, and near the main cliff, there's a spring. There are two notable knolls about 400 yards apart, and the tops of these are marked with remnants of house walls; pieces of walls can also be seen on all the hills in between. This location is known as Sikyátki, 21 the yellow house, named for the color of the sandstone used to construct the houses. These and other partial walls are less than a foot thick, made from small stones shaped by rubbing, and all held together with mud; the inside of the walls also features a smooth layer of mud plaster. The rooms are very small, with the largest being 9½ feet long and 4½ feet wide. It seems unlikely that any of these structures reached more than two stories high, and many were built into excavated areas around the rocky peaks of the knolls. In these cases, no rear wall was constructed; the partition walls, angled irregularly, connect directly to the rock. Still, the sheer number of these houses, small as they were, must have exceeded the needs of the Fire-people since the oval house they left behind measured no more than a hundred feet by fifty. It’s likely other groups, whose stories have not been preserved, also met a similar fate by building there, as the Walpi people eventually killed all the inhabitants.
There is little or no detail in the legends of the Bear people as to their life in Antelope Canyon; they can now distinguish only one ruin with certainty as having been occupied by their ancestors, while to all the other ruins fanciful names have been applied. Nor is there any special cause mentioned for abandoning their dwellings there; probably, however, a sufficient reason was the cessation of springs in their vicinity. Traces of former large springs are seen at all of them, but no water flows from them at the present time. Whatever their motive, the Bears left Antelope Canyon, and moved over to the village of Walpi, on the terrace below the point of the mesa. They were received kindly there, and were apparently placed on an equal footing with the Walpi, for it seems the Snake, Horn, and Bear have always been on terms of friendship. They built houses at that village, and lived there for some considerable time; then they moved a short distance and built again almost on the very point of the mesa. This change was not caused by any disagreement with their neighbors; they simply chose that point as a suitable place on which to build all their houses together. The site of this Bear house is called Kisákobi, the obliterated house, and the name is very appropriate, as there is merely the faintest trace here and there to show where a building stood, the stones having been used in the construction of the modern Walpi. These two villages were quite close together, and the subsequent construction of a few additional groups of rooms almost connected them, so that they were always considered and spoken of as one.
There's not much detail in the stories of the Bear people about their life in Antelope Canyon; they can now only clearly identify one ruin as having been occupied by their ancestors, while all the other ruins have been given imaginative names. There isn’t any specific reason mentioned for leaving their homes there; likely, one reason was the drying up of the springs nearby. Signs of once-large springs can be seen at all the sites, but no water flows from them now. Whatever their reason was, the Bears left Antelope Canyon and relocated to the village of Walpi, on the terrace below the mesa's peak. They were welcomed there and seemed to be treated as equals by the Walpi, as the Snake, Horn, and Bear have always maintained friendly relations. They built homes in that village and lived there for a considerable time before moving a short distance to build again almost right on the mesa's edge. This move wasn’t due to any conflicts with their neighbors; they simply decided that location was a better spot to build all their houses together. The site of this Bear house is called Kisákobi, the erased house, which is fitting since only faint traces remain to indicate where the building once stood, as the stones were repurposed in the construction of modern Walpi. These two villages were quite close to each other, and the later addition of a few more rooms almost connected them, so they were always regarded and referred to as one.
It was at this period, while Walpi was still on this lower site, that the Spaniards came into the country. They met with little or no opposition, and their entrance was marked by no great disturbances. No special tradition preserves any of the circumstances of this event; these first coming Spaniards being only spoken of as the “Kast´ilumuh who wore iron garments, and came from the south,” and this brief mention may be accounted for by the fleeting nature of these early visits.
It was during this time, while Walpi was still in this lower location, that the Spaniards arrived in the area. They faced little to no resistance, and their arrival caused no significant disruptions. There isn't any specific tradition that records the details of this event; these first Spaniards are simply referred to as the “Kast´ilumuh who wore iron clothes and came from the south,” and this brief mention can be attributed to the temporary nature of these early visits.
The zeal of the Spanish priests carried them everywhere throughout 22 their newly acquired territory, and some time in the seventeenth century a band of missionary monks found their way to Tusayan. They were accompanied by a few troops to impress the people with a due regard for Spanish authority, but to display the milder side of their mission, they also brought herds of sheep and cattle for distribution. At first these were herded at various springs within a wide radius around the villages, and the names still attaching to these places memorize the introduction of sheep and cattle to this region. The Navajo are first definitely mentioned in tradition as occupants of this vicinity in connection with these flocks and herds, in the distribution of which they gave much undesirable assistance by driving off the larger portion to their own haunts.
The enthusiasm of the Spanish priests led them everywhere throughout 22 their newly acquired territory, and sometime in the seventeenth century, a group of missionary monks made their way to Tusayan. They were accompanied by a few troops to assert Spanish authority, but to show the gentler side of their mission, they also brought along herds of sheep and cattle to distribute. At first, these animals were gathered at various springs within a wide area around the villages, and the names that remain associated with these places commemorate the introduction of sheep and cattle to the region. The Navajo are first clearly mentioned in tradition as inhabitants of this area in relation to these flocks and herds, from which they provided much unwanted help by driving off a significant portion to their own territory.
The missionaries selected Awatubi, Walpi, and Shumopavi as the sites for their mission buildings, and at once, it is said, began to introduce a system of enforced labor. The memory of the mission period is held in great detestation, and the onerous toil the priests imposed is still adverted to as the principal grievance. Heavy pine timbers, many of which are now pointed out in the kiva roofs, of from 15 to 20 feet in length and a foot or more in diameter, were cut at the San Francisco Mountain, and gangs of men were compelled to carry and drag them to the building sites, where they were used as house beams. This necessitated prodigious toil, for the distance by trail is a hundred miles, most of the way over a rough and difficult country. The Spaniards are said to have employed a few ox teams in this labor, but the heaviest share was performed by the impressed Hopituh, who were driven in gangs by the Spanish soldiers, and any who refused to work were confined in a prison house and starved into submission.
The missionaries chose Awatubi, Walpi, and Shumopavi as the locations for their mission buildings and immediately began implementing a system of forced labor. The memory of this mission period is remembered with strong dislike, and the hard labor imposed by the priests is still regarded as the main complaint. Heavy pine logs, many of which can now be seen in the kiva roofs, measuring 15 to 20 feet long and a foot or more in diameter, were cut from the San Francisco Mountain. Groups of men were forced to carry and drag these logs to the building sites, where they were used as house beams. This required immense effort, as the trail distance is a hundred miles, mostly across rough and challenging terrain. It is said that the Spaniards used a few ox teams for this work, but the majority of the burden fell on the coerced Hopituh, who were driven in groups by Spanish soldiers, and anyone who refused to work was locked in a prison and starved into compliance.
The “men with the long robes,” as the missionaries were called, are said to have lived among these people for a long time, but no trace of their individuality survives in tradition.
The “men in long robes,” as the missionaries were known, are said to have lived among these people for a long time, but no trace of their individuality remains in tradition.
Possibly the Spanish missionaries may have striven to effect some social improvement among these people, and by the adoption of some harsh measures incurred the jealous anger of the chiefs. But the system of labor they enforced was regarded, perhaps justly, as the introduction of serfdom, such as then prevailed in the larger communities in the Rio Grande valleys. Perhaps tradition belies them; but there are many stories of their evil, sensual lives—assertions that they violated women, and held many of the young girls at their mission houses, not as pupils, but as concubines.
Possibly the Spanish missionaries tried to bring about some social improvement among these people, but by using some harsh methods, they triggered the jealous anger of the chiefs. However, the labor system they imposed was seen, perhaps justifiably, as a form of serfdom, similar to what was common in the larger communities in the Rio Grande valleys. Perhaps tradition misrepresents them; but there are many tales of their immoral, indulgent lives—claims that they abused women and kept many young girls at their mission houses, not as students, but as concubines.
In any case, these hapless monks were engaged in a perilous mission in seeking to supplant the primitive faith of the Tusayan, for among the native priests they encountered prejudices even as violent as their own. With too great zeal they prohibited the sacred dances, the votive offerings to the nature-deities, and similar public observances, and strove to suppress the secret rites and abolish the religious orders and societies. But these were too closely incorporated with the system of gentes and 23 other family kinships to admit of their extinction. Traditionally, it is said that, following the discontinuance of the prescribed ceremonies, the favor of the gods was withdrawn, the clouds brought no rain, and the fields yielded no corn. Such a coincidence in this arid region is by no means improbable, and according to the legends, a succession of dry seasons resulting in famine has been of not infrequent occurrence. The superstitious fears of the people were thus aroused, and they cherished a mortal hatred of the monks.
In any case, these unfortunate monks were on a dangerous mission trying to replace the primitive faith of the Tusayan, because among the native priests, they faced prejudices that were just as intense as their own. With too much enthusiasm, they banned the sacred dances, the offerings to nature gods, and other public rituals, and they tried to eliminate secret ceremonies and dissolve the religious orders and societies. However, these were too deeply connected to the systems of clans and other family ties to be completely eradicated. Traditionally, it's said that after the required ceremonies stopped, the gods' favor was lost, the clouds didn't bring rain, and the fields produced no corn. Such a coincidence in this dry area is certainly possible, and according to the legends, a series of dry seasons leading to famine has happened many times before. The people's superstitious fears were stirred, and they developed a deep hatred for the monks.
In such mood were they in the summer of 1680, when the village Indians rose in revolt, drove out the Spaniards, and compelled them to retreat to Mexico. There are some dim traditions of that event still existing among the Tusayan, and they tell of one of their own race coming from the river region by the way of Zuñi to obtain their cooperation in the proposed revolt. To this they consented.
In the summer of 1680, they were in that mindset when the village Indians revolted, forced the Spaniards to leave, and made them retreat to Mexico. Some vague stories about that event still exist among the Tusayan, and they speak of one of their own coming from the river area, traveling through Zuñi to get their support for the planned revolt. They agreed to help.
Only a few Spaniards being present at that time, the Tusayan found courage to vent their enmity in massacre, and every one of the hated invaders perished on the appointed day. The traditions of the massacre center on the doom of the monks, for they were regarded as the embodiment of all that was evil in Spanish rule, and their pursuit, as they tried to escape among the sand dunes, and the mode of their slaughter, is told with grim precision; they were all overtaken and hacked to pieces with stone tomahawks.
Only a few Spaniards were there at the time, so the Tusayan gathered the courage to express their hatred through a massacre, and every one of the despised invaders was killed on that day. The stories about the massacre focus on the fate of the monks, who were seen as the epitome of all that was bad about Spanish rule. Their desperate attempts to escape through the sand dunes and the details of their slaughter are recounted with brutal accuracy; they were all caught and brutally killed with stone tomahawks.
It is told that while the monks were still in authority some of the Snake women urged a withdrawal from Walpi, and, to incite the men to action, carried their mealing-stones and cooking vessels to the summit of the mesa, where they desired the men to build new houses, less accessible to the domineering priests. The men followed them, and two or three small house groups were built near the southwest end of the present village, one of them being still occupied by a Snake family, but the others have been demolished or remodeled. A little farther north, also on the west edge, the small house clusters there were next built by the families of two women called Tji-vwó-wati and Si-kya-tcí-wati. Shortly after the massacre the lower village was entirely abandoned, and the building material carried above to the point which the Snakes had chosen, and on which the modern Walpi was constructed. Several beams of the old mission houses are now pointed out in the roofs of the kivas.
It's said that while the monks were still in charge, some of the Snake women encouraged a move away from Walpi, and to motivate the men to take action, they carried their grinding stones and cooking pots to the top of the mesa, where they wanted the men to build new houses that would be less vulnerable to the controlling priests. The men followed them, and two or three small groups of houses were built near the southwest end of the current village, one of which is still occupied by a Snake family, while the others have been torn down or updated. A bit further north, also on the western edge, small clusters of houses were later built by the families of two women named Tji-vwó-wati and Si-kya-tcí-wati. Shortly after the massacre, the lower village was completely abandoned, and the building materials were taken up to the spot chosen by the Snakes, where modern Walpi was built. Several beams from the old mission houses can now be seen in the roofs of the kivas.
There was a general apprehension that the Spaniards would send a force to punish them, and the Shumopavi also reconstructed their village in a stronger position, on a high mesa overlooking its former site. The other villages were already in secure positions, and all the smaller agricultural settlements were abandoned at this period, and excepting at one or two places on the Moen-kopi, the Tusayan have ever since confined themselves to the close vicinity of their main villages.
There was a widespread fear that the Spaniards would send troops to punish them, so the Shumopavi rebuilt their village in a more secure location, on a high mesa overlooking its former spot. The other villages were already well-protected, and all the smaller farming settlements were abandoned during this time. Aside from one or two locations on the Moen-kopi, the Tusayan have since limited themselves to the immediate area around their main villages.
The house masses do not appear to bear any relation to division by phratries. It is surprising that even the social division of the phratries 24 is preserved. The Hopituh certainly marry within phratries, and occasionally with the same gens. There is no doubt, however, that in the earlier villages each gens, and where practicable, the whole of the phratry, built their houses together. To a certain extent the house of the priestess of a gens is still regarded as the home of the gens. She has to be consulted concerning proposed marriages, and has much to say in other social arrangements.
The house layouts don’t seem to be related to division by phratries. It’s surprising that the social division of the phratries 24 is still maintained. The Hopituh do marry within phratries, and sometimes even within the same gens. However, there’s no doubt that in the earlier villages, each gens, and whenever possible, the entire phratry, built their houses together. To some extent, the house of the priestess of a gens is still seen as the home of the gens. She must be consulted about proposed marriages and has a significant role in other social arrangements.
While the village of the Walpi was still upon the west side of the mesa point, some of them moved around and built houses beside a spring close to the east side of the mesa. Soon after this a dispute over planting ground arose between them and the Sikyátki, whose village was also on that side of the mesa and but a short distance above them. From this time forward bad blood lay between the Sikyátki and the Walpi, who took up the quarrel of their suburb. It also happened about that time, so tradition says, more of the Coyote people came from the north, and the Pikyás nyu-mu, the young cornstalk, who were the latest of the Water people, came in from the south. The Sikyátki, having acquired their friendship, induced them to build on two mounds, on the summit of the mesa overlooking their village. They had been greatly harrassed by the young slingers and archers of Walpi, who would come across to the edge of the high cliff and assail them with impunity, but the occupation of these two mounds by friends afforded effectual protection to their village. These knolls are about 40 yards apart, and about 40 feet above the level of the mesa which is something over 400 feet above Sikyátki. Their roughly leveled summits measure 20 by 10 feet and are covered with traces of house walls; and it is evident that groups of small-roomed houses were clustered also around the sloping sides. About a hundred yards south from their dwellings the people of the mounds built for their own protection a strong wall entirely across the mesa, which at that point is contracted to about 200 feet in width, with deep vertical cliffs on either side. The base of the wall is still quite distinct, and is about 3 feet thick.
While the village of Walpi was still on the west side of the mesa point, some of its residents moved around and built houses near a spring on the east side of the mesa. Shortly after, a disagreement over farming land broke out between them and the Sikyátki, whose village was also on that side of the mesa and just a short distance above them. From that point on, there was tension between the Sikyátki and Walpi, who took up the conflict of their neighbors. Around the same time, as tradition says, more people from the Coyote group arrived from the north, and the Pikyás nyu-mu, the young cornstalks, who were the latest among the Water people, came in from the south. The Sikyátki, having gained their friendship, persuaded them to build on two mounds at the top of the mesa overlooking their village. They had been significantly harassed by the young slingers and archers from Walpi, who would come to the edge of the high cliff and attack them without consequence, but the presence of these two mounds occupied by allies provided effective protection for their village. The knolls are about 40 yards apart and around 40 feet above the mesa level, which is more than 400 feet above Sikyátki. Their roughly leveled tops measure 20 by 10 feet and are covered with remnants of house walls; it’s clear that clusters of small houses were also built on the sloping sides. About a hundred yards south of their homes, the people from the mounds constructed a strong wall across the mesa for their own protection, where it narrows down to about 200 feet in width, with steep vertical cliffs on either side. The base of the wall is still quite clear and is about 3 feet thick.
But no reconciliation was ever effected between the Walpi and the Sikyátki and their allies, and in spite of their defensive wall frequent assaults were made upon the latter until they were forced to retreat. The greater number of them retired to Oraibi and the remainder to Sikyátki, and the feud was still maintained between them and the Walpi.
But there was never any reconciliation between the Walpi and the Sikyátki and their allies, and despite their defensive wall, they faced frequent attacks until they were compelled to pull back. Most of them withdrew to Oraibi, while the rest went to Sikyátki, and the conflict continued between them and the Walpi.
Some of the incidents as well as the disastrous termination of this feud are still narrated. A party of the Sikyátki went prowling through Walpi one day while the men were afield, and among other outrages, one of them shot an arrow through a window and killed a chief’s daughter while she was grinding corn. The chief’s son resolved to avenge the death of his sister, and some time after this went to Sikyátki, professedly to take part in a religious dance, in which he joined until just before the close of the ceremony. Having previously observed where the handsomest girl was seated among the spectators on the house terraces, 25 he ran up the ladder as if to offer her a prayer emblem, but instead he drew out a sharp flint knife from his girdle and cut her throat. He threw the body down where all could see it, and ran along the adjoining terraces till he cleared the village. A little way up the mesa was a large flat rock, upon which he sprang and took off his dancer’s mask so that all might recognize him; then turning again to the mesa he sped swiftly up the trail and escaped.
Some of the events and the tragic end of this feud are still talked about. One day, a group from Sikyátki wandered through Walpi while the men were out in the fields, and among other acts of violence, one of them shot an arrow through a window and killed a chief’s daughter as she was grinding corn. The chief’s son decided to get revenge for his sister's death, and some time later, he went to Sikyátki, claiming he wanted to join in a religious dance. He participated until just before the ceremony ended. He had noticed where the prettiest girl was sitting among the spectators on the house terraces, 25 and he ran up the ladder as if he was going to give her a prayer emblem, but instead, he pulled out a sharp flint knife from his belt and cut her throat. He threw her body down for everyone to see and then ran along the neighboring terraces until he left the village. A little way up the mesa, there was a large flat rock where he jumped and removed his dancer’s mask so that everyone could identify him; then, turning back to the mesa, he quickly ran up the trail and escaped.
And so foray and slaughter continued to alternate between them until the planting season of some indefinite year came around. All the Sikyátki men were to begin the season by planting the fields of their chief on a certain day, which was announced from the housetop by the Second Chief as he made his customary evening proclamations, and the Walpi, becoming aware of this, planned a fatal onslaught. Every man and woman able to draw a bow or wield a weapon were got in readiness and at night they crossed the mesa and concealed themselves along its edge, overlooking the doomed village. When the day came they waited until the men had gone to the field and then rushed down upon the houses. The chief, who was too old to go afield, was the first one killed, and then followed the indiscriminate slaughter of women and children, and the destruction of the houses. The wild tumult in the village alarmed the Sikyátki and they came rushing back, but too late to defend their homes. Their struggles were hopeless, for they had only their planting sticks to use as weapons, which availed but little against the Walpi with their bows and arrows, spears, slings, and war clubs. Nearly all of the Sikyátki men were killed, but some of them escaped to Oraibi and some to Awatubi. A number of the girls and younger women were spared, and distributed among the different villages, where they became wives of their despoilers.
And so, raids and bloodshed kept alternating between them until the planting season of some uncertain year arrived. All the men of Sikyátki were set to kick off the season by planting their chief's fields on a specific day, which was announced from the rooftop by the Second Chief during his usual evening announcements. The people of Walpi, learning of this, devised a deadly attack. Every man and woman capable of using a bow or weapon prepared themselves, and at night, they crossed the mesa and hid along its edge, watching the doomed village. When the day came, they waited until the men had gone to the fields and then charged down into the houses. The chief, who was too old to join in the planting, was the first to be killed, followed by the indiscriminate slaughter of women and children and the destruction of homes. The chaos in the village alarmed the Sikyátki, and they rushed back, but it was too late to protect their homes. Their efforts were futile, as they only had their planting sticks to defend themselves, which were ineffective against the Walpi armed with bows and arrows, spears, slings, and war clubs. Nearly all of the Sikyátki men were killed, but a few managed to escape to Oraibi and some to Awatubi. Several girls and younger women were captured and taken to various villages, where they became the wives of their captors.
It is said to have been shortly after the destruction of Sikyátki that the first serious inroad of a hostile tribe occurred within this region, and all the stories aver that these early hostiles were from the north, the Ute being the first who are mentioned, and after them the Apache, who made an occasional foray.
It’s said that not long after the destruction of Sikyátki, the first major attack by a hostile tribe happened in this area, and all the accounts agree that these early aggressors came from the north. The Ute are the first ones mentioned, followed by the Apache, who made occasional raids.
While these families of Hopituh stock had been building their straggling dwellings along the canyon brinks, and grouping in villages around the base of the East Mesa, other migratory bands of Hopituh had begun to arrive on the Middle Mesa. As already said, it is admitted that the Snake were the first occupants of this region, but beyond that fact the traditions are contradictory and confused. It is probable, however, that not long after the arrival of the Horn, the Squash people came from the south and built a village on the Middle Mesa, the ruin of which is called Chukubi. It is on the edge of the cliff on the east side of the neck of that mesa, and a short distance south of the direct trail leading from Walpi to Oraibi. The Squash people say that they came from Palát Kwabi, the Red Land in the far South, and this vague term expresses nearly all their knowledge of that traditional land. They say they lived 26 for a long time in the valley of the Colorado Chiquito, on the south side of that stream and not far from the point where the railway crosses it. They still distinguish the ruin of their early village there, which was built as usual on the brink of a canyon, and call it Etípsíkya, after a shrub that grows there profusely. They crossed the river opposite that place, but built no permanent houses until they reached the vicinity of Chukubi, near which two smaller clusters of ruins, on knolls, mark the sites of dwellings which they claim to have been theirs. Three groups (nyumu) traveling together were the next to follow them; these were the Bear, the Bear-skin-rope, and the Blue Jay. They are said to have been very numerous, and to have come from the vicinity of San Francisco Mountain. They did not move up to Chukubi, but built a large village on the summit, at the south end of the mesa, close to the site of the present Mashongnavi. Soon afterward came the Burrowing Owl, and the Coyote, from the vicinity of Navajo Mountains in the north, but they were not very numerous. They also built upon the Mashongnavi summit.
While these Hopituh families were constructing their scattered homes along the canyon edges and forming villages at the base of the East Mesa, other migrating groups of Hopituh started arriving at the Middle Mesa. As mentioned, it's acknowledged that the Snake were the first inhabitants of this area, but beyond that, the stories are inconsistent and unclear. It's likely, though, that not long after the arrival of the Horn, the Squash people came from the south and established a village on the Middle Mesa, the ruins of which are known as Chukubi. It's located on the edge of the cliff on the east side of the mesa’s neck, just south of the main path from Walpi to Oraibi. The Squash people say they originated from Palát Kwabi, the Red Land in the distant South, a vague term that encompasses most of their understanding of that legendary land. They state they lived for quite a long time in the valley of the Colorado Chiquito, on the southern side of the river and not far from where the railway crosses it. They still recognize the remains of their early village there, which was typically built on the edge of a canyon, and they call it Etípsíkya, named after a shrub that grows abundantly in the area. They crossed the river at that spot but didn't construct any permanent homes until they arrived near Chukubi, where two smaller groups of ruins on hills indicate the sites of homes they claim as theirs. Three groups (nyumu) traveling together followed them next: the Bear, the Bear-skin-rope, and the Blue Jay. They are said to have been numerous and came from the San Francisco Mountain area. Instead of moving up to Chukubi, they built a large village on the summit at the southern end of the mesa, near the current site of Mashongnavi. Shortly after, the Burrowing Owl and the Coyote arrived from the Navajo Mountains in the north, but they were not very many. They also constructed their homes on the Mashongnavi summit.
After this the Squash people found that the water from their springs was decreasing, and began moving toward the end of the mesa, where the other people were. But as there was then no suitable place left on the summit, they built a village on the sandy terrace close below it, on the west side; and as the springs at Chukubi ultimately ceased entirely, the rest of the Squash people came to the terrace and were again united in one village. Straggling bands of several other groups, both wingwu and nyumu, are mentioned as coming from various directions. Some built on the terrace and some found house room in Mashongnavi. This name is derived as follows: On the south side of the terrace on which the Squash village was built is a high column of sandstone which is vertically split in two, and formerly there was a third pillar in line, which has long since fallen. These three columns were called Tútuwalha, the guardians, and both the Squash village and the one on the summit were so named. On the north side of the terrace, close to the present village, is another irregular massy pillar of sandstone called Mashóniniptu, meaning “the other which remains erect,” having reference to the one on the south side, which had fallen. When the Squash withdrew to the summit the village was then called Mashóniniptuovi, “at the place of the other which remains erect;” now that term is never used, but always its syncopated form, Mashongnavi.
After this, the Squash people noticed that the water from their springs was drying up, so they started moving towards the edge of the mesa, where other people were located. However, since there was no suitable spot left on the top, they built a village on the sandy terrace just below it, on the west side. As the springs at Chukubi eventually ran dry, the rest of the Squash people joined them on the terrace, forming one village again. Straggling groups from various other communities, both wingwu and nyumu, were also noted as arriving from different directions. Some settled on the terrace, while others found shelter in Mashongnavi. This name comes from an interesting feature: on the south side of the terrace where the Squash village was established, there is a tall sandstone column that is split down the middle, and there used to be a third pillar in a row, which has since fallen. These three columns were called Tútuwalha, meaning "the guardians," and both the Squash village and the one on the summit were named after them. On the north side of the terrace, close to the current village, there's another irregularly shaped pillar of sandstone referred to as Mashóniniptu, which means "the other that remains upright," in reference to the one on the south that had fallen. When the Squash moved back to the summit, the village was named Mashóniniptuovi, meaning "at the place of the other that remains upright;" however, that term is no longer used, and it is always referred to in its shortened form, Mashongnavi.
The Squash village, on the south end of the Middle Mesa, was attacked by a fierce band that came from the north, some say the Ute, others say the Apache; but whoever the invaders were, they completely overpowered the people, and carried off great stores of food and other plunder. The village was then evacuated, the houses dismantled, and the material removed to the high summit, where they reconstructed their dwellings around the village which thenceforth bore its present name of Mashongnavi. Some of the Squash people moved over to Oraibi, and portions of the Katchina and Paroquet people came from 27 there to Mashongnavi about the same time, and a few of these two groups occupied some vacant houses also in Shupaulovi; for this village even at that early date had greatly diminished in population, having sustained a disastrous loss of men in the canyon affrays east of Walpi.
The Squash village, located at the south end of the Middle Mesa, was attacked by a fierce group that came from the north; some say they were Ute, others say Apache. But whoever the invaders were, they completely overpowered the villagers and took away a lot of food and other valuables. The village was then evacuated, the houses taken apart, and the materials moved to the high summit, where they rebuilt their homes around the village that became known as Mashongnavi. Some of the Squash people relocated to Oraibi, and parts of the Katchina and Paroquet people came from 27 there to Mashongnavi around the same time, and a few from these groups also occupied some vacant houses in Shupaulovi. Even at that early time, this village had seen a significant drop in population, having suffered a disastrous loss of men in the canyon conflicts east of Walpi.
Shumopavi seems to have been built by portions of the same groups who went to the adjacent Mashongnavi, but the traditions of the two villages are conflicting. The old traditionists at Shumopavi hold that the first to come there were the Paroquet, the Bear, the Bear-skin-rope, and the Blue Jay. They came from the west—probably from San Francisco Mountain. They claim that ruins on a mesa bluff about 10 miles south from the present village are the remains of a village built by these groups before reaching Shumopavi, and the Paroquets arrived first, it is said, because they were perched on the heads of the Bears, and, when nearing the water, they flew in ahead of the others. These groups built a village on a broken terrace, on the east side of the cliff, and just below the present village. There is a spring close by called after the Shunóhu, a tall red grass, which grew abundantly there, and from which the town took its name. This spring was formerly very large, but two years ago a landslide completely buried it; lately, however, a small outflow is again apparent.
Shumopavi seems to have been built by some of the same groups that went to the nearby Mashongnavi, but the traditions of the two villages contradict each other. The old traditionalists at Shumopavi believe that the first to arrive were the Paroquet, the Bear, the Bear-skin-rope, and the Blue Jay. They came from the west—likely from San Francisco Mountain. They claim that ruins on a mesa bluff about 10 miles south of the current village are the remnants of a village built by these groups before they reached Shumopavi, and it is said that the Paroquets arrived first because they were perched on the Bears' heads, and when they got close to the water, they flew ahead of the others. These groups established a village on a broken terrace on the east side of the cliff, just below the current village. There’s a spring nearby named after the Shunóhu, a tall red grass that used to grow there abundantly, and it's from this grass that the town got its name. This spring used to be very large, but two years ago a landslide completely covered it; however, recently, a small flow has started to show up again.
The ruins of the early village cover a hillocky area of about 800 by 250 feet, but it is impossible to trace much of the ground plan with accuracy. The corner of an old house still stands, some 6 or 8 feet high, extending about 15 feet on one face and about 10 feet on the other. The wall is over 3 feet in thickness, but of very clumsy masonry, no care having been exercised in dressing the stones, which are of varying sizes and laid in mud plaster. Interest attaches to this fragment, as it is one of the few tangible evidences left of the Spanish priests who engaged in the fatal mission to the Hopituh in the sixteenth century. This bit of wall, which now forms part of a sheep-fold, is pointed out as the remains of one of the mission buildings.
The ruins of the early village cover a hilly area of about 800 by 250 feet, but it's difficult to accurately trace much of the layout. A corner of an old house still stands, around 6 or 8 feet high, measuring about 15 feet on one side and about 10 feet on the other. The wall is over 3 feet thick but is made of very rough masonry, with little care taken in shaping the stones, which vary in size and are set in mud plaster. This fragment is interesting because it is one of the few tangible pieces left from the Spanish priests who took on the doomed mission to the Hopituh in the sixteenth century. This section of wall, which now forms part of a sheepfold, is identified as the remains of one of the mission buildings.
Other groups followed—the Mole, the Spider, and the “Wíksrun.” These latter took their name from a curious ornament worn by the men. A piece of the leg-bone of a bear, from which the marrow had been extracted and a stopper fixed in one end, was attached to the fillet binding the hair, and hung down in front of the forehead. This gens and the Mole are now extinct.
Other groups came after—the Mole, the Spider, and the “Wíksrun.” The latter got their name from a quirky ornament worn by the men. A piece of a bear’s leg bone, with the marrow taken out and a stopper placed in one end, was attached to the strip tying back the hair and hung down in front of the forehead. This clan and the Mole are now extinct.
Shumopavi received no further accession of population, but lost to some extent by a portion of the Bear people moving across to Walpi. No important event seems to have occurred among them for a long period after the destruction of Sikyátki, in which they bore some part, and only cursory mention is made of the ingress of “enemies from the north;” but their village, apparently, was not assailed.
Shumopavi didn’t gain any more people, but it did lose some when a group of the Bear people moved to Walpi. There doesn’t seem to have been any significant events among them for a long time after the destruction of Sikyátki, in which they played a role, and only a brief mention is made of “enemies from the north” coming in; however, it seems their village was not attacked.
The Oraibi traditions tend to confirm those of Shumopavi, and tell that the first houses there were built by Bears, who came from the latter place. The following is from a curious legend of the early settlement:
The Oraibi traditions usually align with those of Shumopavi, stating that the first houses there were constructed by Bears, who arrived from that location. The following is taken from an intriguing legend of the early settlement:
28 The Bear people had two chiefs, who were brothers; the elder was called Vwen-ti-só-mo, and the younger Ma-tcí-to. They had a desperate quarrel at Shumopavi, and their people divided into two factions, according as they inclined to one or other of the contestants. After a long period of contention Ma-tcí-to and his followers withdrew to the mesa where Oraibi now stands, about 8 miles northwest from Shumopavi, and built houses a little to the southwest of the limits of the present town. These houses were afterwards destroyed by “enemies from the north,” and the older portion of the existing town, the southwest ends of the house rows, were built with stones from the demolished houses. Fragments of these early walls are still occasionally unearthed.
28 The Bear people had two chiefs who were brothers; the older was named Vwen-ti-só-mo, and the younger was Ma-tcí-to. They had a fierce argument at Shumopavi, which split their people into two groups, depending on who they supported. After a long time of conflict, Ma-tcí-to and his followers moved to the mesa where Oraibi is now located, about 8 miles northwest of Shumopavi, and built houses a bit southwest of where the current town is. These houses were later destroyed by “enemies from the north,” and the older part of the existing town, specifically the southwest ends of the house rows, was constructed with stones from the destroyed houses. Pieces of these early walls are still sometimes found.
After Ma-tcí-to and his people were established there, whenever any of the Shumopavi people became dissatisfied with that place they built at Oraibi, Ma-tcí-to placed a little stone monument about halfway between these two villages to mark the boundary of the land. Vwenti-so´-mo objected to this, but it was ultimately accepted with the proviso that the village growing the fastest should have the privilege of moving it toward the other village. The monument still stands, and is on the direct Oraibi trail from Shumopavi, 3 miles from the latter. It is a well dressed, rectangular block of sandstone, projecting two feet above the ground, and measures 8½ by 7 inches. On the end is carved the rude semblance of a human head, or mask, the eyes and mouth being merely round shallow holes, with a black line painted around them. The stone is pecked on the side, but the head and front are rubbed quite smooth, and the block, tapering slightly to the base, suggests the ancient Roman Termini.
After Ma-tcí-to and his people settled there, whenever any of the Shumopavi people were unhappy with the place they built in Oraibi, Ma-tcí-to put up a small stone monument about halfway between the two villages to mark the land boundary. Vwenti-so´-mo opposed this, but it was eventually accepted with the agreement that the village growing the fastest could move it closer to the other village. The monument still stands and is on the direct trail from Shumopavi to Oraibi, 3 miles from the latter. It is a well-crafted, rectangular block of sandstone, sticking out two feet above the ground, and measures 8½ by 7 inches. The end has a rough carving of a human head or mask, with the eyes and mouth made of round shallow holes outlined in black paint. The side of the stone is pecked, but the head and front are smooth, and the block, slightly tapering towards the base, resembles the ancient Roman Termini.
There are Eagle people living at Oraibi, Mashongnavi, and Walpi, and it would seem as if they had journeyed for some time with the later Snake people and others from the northwest. Vague traditions attach them to several of the ruins north of the Moen-kopi, although most of these are regarded as the remains of Snake dwellings.
There are Eagle people living at Oraibi, Mashongnavi, and Walpi, and it seems they have traveled for a while with the later Snake people and others from the northwest. Unclear traditions link them to several of the ruins north of the Moen-kopi, although most of these are seen as the remains of Snake homes.
The legend of the Eagle people introduces them from the west, coming in by way of the Moen-kopi water course. They found many people living in Tusayan, at Oraibi, the Middle Mesa, and near the East Mesa, but the Snake village was yet in the valley. Some of the Eagles remained at Oraibi, but the main body moved to a large mound just east of Mashongnavi, on the summit of which they built a village and called it Shi-tái-mu. Numerous traces of small-roomed houses can be seen on this mound and on some of the lower surroundings. The uneven summit is about 300 by 200 feet, and the village seems to have been built in the form of an irregular ellipse, but the ground plan is very obscure.
The legend of the Eagle people describes their arrival from the west, traveling via the Moen-kopi waterway. They discovered many people living in Tusayan, at Oraibi, the Middle Mesa, and around the East Mesa, but the Snake village was still located in the valley. Some of the Eagles stayed at Oraibi, but most moved to a large mound just east of Mashongnavi, where they established a village called Shi-tái-mu. Numerous remnants of small house structures can be seen on this mound and in some of the nearby areas. The uneven summit is about 300 by 200 feet, and the village appears to have been constructed in an irregular oval shape, although the overall layout is quite unclear.
While the Eagles were living at Shi-tái-mu, they sent “Yellow Foot” to the mountain in the east (at the headwaters of the Rio Grande) to obtain a dog. After many perilous adventures in caverns guarded by bear, mountain lion, and rattlesnake, he got two dogs and returned. 29 They were wanted to keep the coyotes out of the corn and the gardens. The dogs grew numerous, and would go to Mashongnavi in search of food, and also to some of the people of that village, which led to serious quarrels between them and the Eagle people. Ultimately the Shi-tái-mu chief proclaimed a feast, and told the people to prepare to leave the village forever. On the feast day the women arranged the food basins on the ground in a long line leading out of the village. The people passed along this line, tasting a mouthful here or there, but without stopping, and when they reached the last basin they were beyond the limits of the village. Without turning around they continued on down into the valley until they were halted by the Snake people. An arrangement was effected with the latter, and the Eagles built their houses in the Snake village. A few of the Eagle families who had become attached to Mashongnavi chose to go to that village, where their descendants still reside, and are yet held as close relatives by the Eagles of Walpi. The land around the East Mesa was then portioned out, the Snakes, Horns, Bears, and Eagles each receiving separate lands, and these old allotments are still approximately maintained.
While the Eagles were living at Shi-tái-mu, they sent “Yellow Foot” to the mountain in the east (where the Rio Grande begins) to get a dog. After facing many dangerous adventures in caves guarded by bears, mountain lions, and rattlesnakes, he managed to get two dogs and returned. 29 They needed the dogs to keep the coyotes out of the corn and gardens. The dogs multiplied and would go to Mashongnavi looking for food, which caused serious conflicts between them and the Eagle people. Eventually, the Shi-tái-mu chief announced a feast and told everyone to prepare to leave the village for good. On the day of the feast, the women set up food basins on the ground in a long line leading out of the village. The people walked along this line, tasting a bite here and there, but without stopping. When they reached the last basin, they were outside the village limits. Without looking back, they continued down into the valley until they were stopped by the Snake people. An agreement was reached with them, and the Eagles built their homes in the Snake village. A few Eagle families who had grown fond of Mashongnavi chose to move there, where their descendants still live and are considered close relatives by the Eagles of Walpi. The land around East Mesa was then divided up, with the Snakes, Horns, Bears, and Eagles each receiving their own separate areas, and these original divisions are still mostly respected today.
According to the Eagle traditions the early occupants of Tusayan came in the following succession: Snake, Horn, Bear, Middle Mesa, Oraibi, and Eagle, and finally from the south came the Water families. This sequence is also recognized in the general tenor of the legends of the other groups.
According to Eagle traditions, the early inhabitants of Tusayan arrived in this order: Snake, Horn, Bear, Middle Mesa, Oraibi, and Eagle. Finally, the Water families came from the south. This sequence is also acknowledged in the overall themes of the legends of other groups.
Shupaulovi, a small village quite close to Mashongnavi, would seem to have been established just before the coming of the Water people. Nor does there seem to have been any very long interval between the arrival of the earliest occupants of the Middle Mesa and this latest colony. These were the Sun people, and like the Squash folk, claim to have come from Palátkwabi, the Red Land, in the south. On their northward migration, when they came to the valley of the Colorado Chiquito, they found the Water people there, with whom they lived for some time. This combined village was built upon Homólobi, a round terraced mound near Sunset Crossing, where fragmentary ruins covering a wide area can yet be traced.
Shupaulovi, a small village near Mashongnavi, seems to have been established just before the arrival of the Water people. There doesn’t appear to have been a long gap between when the first inhabitants of the Middle Mesa arrived and this new colony. These were the Sun people, who, like the Squash folk, claim to have come from Palátkwabi, the Red Land, in the south. During their northward migration, when they reached the valley of the Colorado Chiquito, they found the Water people already there, and they lived together for a while. This combined village was built on Homólobi, a round terraced mound near Sunset Crossing, where remnants of ruins spread across a large area can still be seen.
Incoming people from the east had built the large village of Awatubi, high rock, upon a steep mesa about nine miles southeast from Walpi. When the Sun people came into Tusayan they halted at that village and a few of them remained there permanently, but the others continued west to the Middle Mesa. At that time also they say Chukubi, Shitaimu, Mashongnavi, and the Squash village on the terrace were all occupied, and they built on the terrace close to the Squash village also. The Sun people were then very numerous and soon spread their dwellings over the summit where the ruin now stands, and many indistinct lines of house walls around this dilapidated village attest its former size. Like the neighboring village, it takes its name from a rock near by, 30 which is used as a place for the deposit of votive offerings, but the etymology of the term can not be traced.
People coming from the east built the large village of Awatubi, high rock, on a steep mesa about nine miles southeast of Walpi. When the Sun people arrived in Tusayan, they stopped at that village and some of them stayed there permanently, while the others went west to the Middle Mesa. At that time, they also say that Chukubi, Shitaimu, Mashongnavi, and the Squash village on the terrace were all occupied, and they built on the terrace near the Squash village as well. The Sun people were very numerous then and soon spread their homes across the summit where the ruins now stand, and many indistinct lines of house walls around this broken-down village show its former size. Like the neighboring village, it gets its name from a nearby rock, 30 that is used as a place for leaving votive offerings, but the origin of the name cannot be traced.
Some of the Bear people also took up their abode at Shupaulovi, and later a nyumu of the Water family called Batni, moisture, built with them; and the diminished families of the existing village are still composed entirely of these three nyumu.
Some of the Bear people also made their home at Shupaulovi, and later a nyumu of the Water family named Batni, meaning moisture, was built there with them; and the smaller families of the current village still consist entirely of these three nyumu.
The next arrivals seem to have been the Asanyumu, who in early days lived in the region of the Chama, in New Mexico, at a village called Kaékibi, near the place now known as Abiquiu. When they left that region they moved slowly westward to a place called Túwii (Santo Domingo), where some of them are said to still reside. The next halt was at Kaiwáika (Laguna) where it is said some families still remain, and they staid also a short time at A´ikoka (Acoma); but none of them remained at that place. From the latter place they went to Sióki (Zuñi), where they remained a long time and left a number of their people there, who are now called Aiyáhokwi by the Zuñi. They finally reached Tusayan by way of Awatubi. They had been preceded from the same part of New Mexico by the Honan nyumu (the Badger people), whom they found living at the last-named village. The Magpie, the Pute Kóhu (Boomerang-shaped hunting stick), and the Field-mouse families of the Asa remained and built beside the Badger, but the rest of its groups continued across to the Walpi Mesa. They were not at first permitted to come up to Walpi, which then occupied its present site, but were allotted a place to build at Coyote Water, a small spring on the east side of the mesa, just under the gap. They had not lived there very long, however, when for some valuable services in defeating at one time a raid of the Ute (who used to be called the Tcingawúptuh) and of the Navajo at another, they were given for planting grounds all the space on the mesa summit from the gap to where Sichumovi now stands, and the same width, extending across the valley to the east. On the mesa summit they built the early portion of the house mass on the north side of the village, now known as Hano. But soon after this came a succession of dry seasons, which caused a great scarcity of food almost amounting to a famine, and many moved away to distant streams. The Asa people went to Túpkabi (Deep Canyon, the de Chelly), about 70 miles northeast from Walpi, where the Navajo received them kindly and supplied them with food. The Asa had preserved some seeds of the peach, which they planted in the canyon nooks, and numerous little orchards still flourish there. They also brought the Navajo new varieties of food plants, and their relations grew very cordial. They built houses along the base of the canyon walls, and dwelt there for two or three generations, during which time many of the Asa women were given to the Navajo, and the descendants of these now constitute a numerous clan among the Navajo, known as the Kiáini, the High-house people.
The next group to arrive seems to have been the Asanyumu, who in earlier times lived in the Chama region of New Mexico, at a village called Kaékibi, near what is now known as Abiquiu. After leaving that area, they gradually moved west to a place called Túwii (Santo Domingo), where some are said to still live. Their next stop was at Kaiwáika (Laguna), where it is said some families still remain, and they also stayed for a brief time at A´ikoka (Acoma); however, none of them stayed there long. From Acoma, they moved to Sióki (Zuñi), where they lived for a long time and left behind many of their people, who are now known as Aiyáhokwi by the Zuñi. They eventually reached Tusayan via Awatubi. They had been preceded by the Honan nyumu (the Badger people), who were already living in the last-named village. The families of the Magpie, the Pute Kóhu (Boomerang-shaped hunting stick), and the Field-mouse from the Asa stayed and built near the Badger people, but the rest of the groups continued across to Walpi Mesa. Initially, they were not allowed to settle at Walpi, which was then located in its current spot, but were given a place to build at Coyote Water, a small spring on the east side of the mesa, just below the gap. However, they did not stay there long before, for their significant help in defeating a Ute raid (who were once called the Tcingawúptuh) and another by the Navajo, they were granted planting grounds covering all the area on the mesa summit from the gap to where Sichumovi now stands, extending the same width across the valley to the east. On the mesa summit, they built the early part of the house mass on the north side of what’s now known as Hano. But soon after that, a series of dry seasons hit, leading to severe food shortages, almost a famine, causing many to move away to more distant streams. The Asa people went to Túpkabi (Deep Canyon, the de Chelly), about 70 miles northeast of Walpi, where they were welcomed by the Navajo, who supplied them with food. The Asa had saved some peach seeds, which they planted in the canyon nooks, and now numerous small orchards still thrive there. They also introduced the Navajo to new varieties of food plants, which improved their relationship significantly. They built homes along the canyon walls and lived there for two or three generations, during which many Asa women married Navajo men, and their descendants now form a large clan among the Navajo, known as the Kiáini, the High-house people.
The Navajo and the Asa eventually quarreled and the latter returned to Walpi, but this was after the arrival of the Hano, by whom they 31 found their old houses occupied. The Asa were taken into the village of Walpi, being given a vacant strip on the east edge of the mesa, just where the main trail comes up to the village. The Navajo, Ute, and Apache had frequently gained entrance to the village by this trail, and to guard it the Asa built a house group along the edge of the cliff at that point, immediately overlooking the trail, where some of the people still live; and the kiva there, now used by the Snake order, belongs to them. There was a crevice in the rock, with a smooth bottom extending to the edge of the cliff and deep enough for a ki´koli. A wall was built to close the outer edge and it was at first intended to build a dwelling house there, but it was afterward excavated to its present size and made into a kiva, still called the wikwálhobi, the kiva of the Watchers of the High Place. The Walpi site becoming crowded, some of the Bear and Lizard people moved out and built houses on the site of the present Sichumovi; several Asa families followed them, and after them came some of the Badger people. The village grew to an extent considerably beyond its present size, when it was abandoned on account of a malignant plague. After the plague, and within the present generation, the village was rebuilt—the old houses being torn down to make the new ones.
The Navajo and the Asa eventually had a falling out, leading the Asa to go back to Walpi, but this happened after the Hano arrived, who occupied their old houses. The Asa were welcomed into the village of Walpi, given an empty section on the east edge of the mesa, right where the main trail leads up to the village. The Navajo, Ute, and Apache frequently used this trail to enter the village, so the Asa built a cluster of houses along the cliff edge at that spot, directly overlooking the trail, where some of the residents still live today; the kiva there, now used by the Snake order, belongs to them. There was a crevice in the rock with a smooth bottom leading to the cliff edge, deep enough for a ki´koli. A wall was built to close off the outer edge, and it was initially planned to build a house there, but it was later excavated to its current size and turned into a kiva, still called the wikwálhobi, the kiva of the Watchers of the High Place. As the Walpi site became overcrowded, some of the Bear and Lizard people moved out and built houses where present-day Sichumovi is located; several Asa families followed them, and then some of the Badger people came. The village expanded significantly beyond its current size until it was abandoned due to a serious plague. After the plague, within the present generation, the village was rebuilt—the old houses were torn down to construct the new ones.
After the Asa came the nest group to arrive was the Water family. Their chief begins the story of their migration in this way:
After the Asa, the next group to arrive was the Water family. Their leader starts the story of their migration like this:
A long time ago, the Snake, Horn, and Eagle people lived in this place (Tusayan), but their corn only grew a short distance, and when they sang for rain, the cloud god sent only a light mist. My people lived far away in Pa-lát Kwá-bi in the South. There was a very mean old man there who, when he encountered anyone, would spit in their face, blow his nose on them, and smear them with filth. He assaulted the girls and did all sorts of evil. Baholikonga became angry about this and turned the world upside down, causing water to shoot up through the kivas and the fireplaces in the houses. The ground split open with huge chasms, and water covered everything except for a narrow strip of mud. The serpent deity instructed all the people to travel across this ridge. As they crossed, the bad people's feet slipped, and they fell into the dark water, while the good, after many days, reached dry land. When the water was rising around the village, the old people climbed to the tops of the houses, thinking they couldn't manage to cross with the younger people. However, Baholikonga covered them with turkey skins, allowing them to spread their wings and float just above the water's surface, thus helping them get to safety. Those who survived from our people included Water, Corn, Lizard, Horned Toad, Sand, two families of Rabbit, and Tobacco. The turkey tail dragged in the water, which is why the turkey tail has white now. The tradition of old people wearing these turkey skins explains why they have dewlaps under their chins like turkeys and why they use turkey feathers in religious ceremonies.
In the story of the wandering of the Water people, many vague references are made to various villages in the South, which they constructed or dwelt in, and to rocks where they carved their totems at temporary halting places. They dwelt for a long time at Homólobi, where the Sun people joined them; and probably not long after the latter left the Water people followed on after them. The largest number of this family seem 32 to have made their dwellings first at Mashongnavi and Shupaulovi; but like the Sun people they soon spread to all the villages.
In the tale of the Water people’s journey, there are many vague mentions of different villages in the South that they built or lived in, and of rocks where they carved their totems during temporary stops. They lived for a long time at Homólobi, where they were joined by the Sun people; and likely not long after the Sun people left, the Water people followed them. The largest group of this family seems to have initially settled at Mashongnavi and Shupaulovi; but, like the Sun people, they quickly spread out to all the villages. 32
The narrative of part of this journey is thus given by the chief before quoted:
The story of this part of the journey is provided by the chief mentioned earlier:
It took 4 years to traverse the war-torn country. The kwakwanti (a warrior group) went ahead of the people, carrying seeds for corn, beans, melons, squashes, and cotton. They would plant corn in the mud early in the morning, and by noon it would be ready to eat, feeding the people. When they reached solid ground, they would rest and then build houses. The kwakwanti were always out scouting—sometimes they were gone for as long as four years. We would follow them on long journeys, stopping to build houses and plant crops. While traveling, if a woman went into labor, we would build her a house, stock it with plenty of food, and leave her there. From these women, the Pima, Maricopa, and other Indians in the South were born.
Down South, before we crossed the mountains (south of the Apache territory), we built large houses and lived there for quite some time. Nearby, there is a big rock that has paintings of the rain clouds from the Water phratry, along with a man carrying corn in his arms. The other phratries also painted images of the Lizard and the Rabbit on it. While they were living there, the kwakwanti went on an expedition far to the north and clashed with a hostile group. They fought day after day, for many days—they only fought during the day, and at night they separated, with each side returning to their own area to rest. One night, the cranes came and each crane carried a kwakwanti on its back, bringing them back to their people in the South.
Again, all the people traveled north until they reached the Little Colorado River, close to the San Francisco Mountains, where they built houses along the river. They also dug long ditches to carry water from the river to their gardens. After living there for a while, they were plagued by swarms of gnats called sand-flies, which bit the children, causing them to swell and die. The area became unbearable, so they had to continue their journey. Before leaving, one of the Rain-women, who was pregnant, was made comfortable in one of the houses on the mountain. She told her people to leave her because she knew this was where she was meant to stay forever. She also promised them that whenever they returned to the mountain to hunt, she would provide them with plenty of game. Beneath her house was a spring, and any woman unable to conceive who drank its water would bear children. The people then began a long journey to reach the top of the tableland to the north. They stopped to rest on one of the terraces where there was no water, and they were very tired and thirsty. Here, the women celebrated the rain feast—they danced for three days, and on the fourth day, the clouds brought heavy rain that refreshed the people. This event is still marked by a circle of stones at that location. They reached a spring southeast of Káibitho (Kumás Spring) and there built a house, living there for some time. Our people had plenty of rain and grew a lot of corn, and some of the Walpi people came to visit us. They told us that their rain only came occasionally in fine misty sprays, and a basket of corn was considered a large crop. So they invited us to move to their land, and eventually, we agreed. When we arrived, we found some Eagle people living near the Second Mesa; our people split up, and some went with the Eagles and have remained there since, while we camped near the First Mesa. It was planting season, and the Walpi celebrated their rain feast, but they only provided a light mist. Then we celebrated our rain feast and planted. Great rains, thunder, and lightning followed immediately, and by the first day after planting, our corn was already half an arm's length tall; by the fourth day, it reached its full height, and in one moon, it was ripe. When we were heading up to the village (Walpi was then located north of the gap), we were met by a Bear man who said that our thunder scared the women, and we should not approach the village. Then the kwakwanti said, “Let’s leave these people and search for another land,” but our women, tired of traveling, insisted we stay. Then “Fire-picker” came down from the village and asked us to come up and settle there, but once we entered the village, the Walpi women screamed in fear—they were scared of our thunder—and the Walpi turned us away. After that, our people, except for those who went to the Second Mesa, traveled northeast as far as the Tsegi (Canyon de Chelly), but I can't say if our people built houses there. They then returned to this area again, built houses, and faced much trouble with the Walpi, but we have lived here ever since.
Groups of the Water people, as already stated, were distributed among all the villages, although the bulk of them remained at the Middle Mesa; but it seems that most of the remaining groups subsequently chose to build their permanent houses at Oraibi. There is no special tradition of this movement; it is only indicated by this circumstance, that in addition to the Water families common to every village, there are still in Oraibi several families of that people which have no representatives in any of the other villages. At a quite early day Oraibi became a place of importance, and they tell of being sufficiently populous to establish many outlying settlements. They still identify these with ruins on the detached mesas in the valley to the south and along the Moen-kopi (“place of flowing water”) and other intermittent streams in the west. These sites were occupied for the purpose of utilizing cultivable tracts of land in their vicinity, and the remotest settlement, about 45 miles west, was especially devoted to the cultivation of cotton, the place being still called by the Navajo and other neighboring tribes, the “cotton planting ground.” It is also said that several of the larger ruins along the course of the Moen-kopi were occupied by groups of the Snake, the Coyote, and the Eagle who dwelt in that region for a long period before they joined the people in Tusayan. The incursions of foreign bands from the north may have hastened that movement, and the Oraibi say they were compelled to withdraw all their outlying colonies. An episode is related of an attack upon the main village when a number of young girls were carried off, and 2 or 3 years afterward the same marauders returned and treated with the Oraibi, who paid a ransom in corn and received all their girls back again. After a quiet interval the pillaging bands renewed their attacks and the settlements on the Moen-kopi were vacated. They were again occupied after another peace was established, and this condition of alternate occupancy and abandonment seems to have existed until within quite recent time.
Groups of the Water people, as mentioned before, were spread across all the villages, although most of them stayed at the Middle Mesa; however, it seems that the remaining groups later decided to build their permanent homes at Oraibi. There isn’t a specific tradition about this movement; it’s only noted by the fact that, in addition to the Water families present in each village, there are still several families in Oraibi that have no representation in any other villages. Early on, Oraibi became an important place, and they say it was populous enough to establish many nearby settlements. They still connect these settlements with ruins on the separate mesas in the valley to the south and along the Moen-kopi (“place of flowing water”) and other intermittent streams to the west. These sites were used to take advantage of the arable land around them, and the furthest settlement, about 45 miles west, was specifically dedicated to growing cotton, which the Navajo and other nearby tribes still refer to as the “cotton planting ground.” It’s also said that several of the larger ruins along the Moen-kopi were occupied by groups of the Snake, the Coyote, and the Eagle, who lived in that area for a long time before joining the people in Tusayan. The invasions by outside groups from the north may have sped up that movement, and the Oraibi say they were forced to pull back all their outlying colonies. There’s a story about an attack on the main village when several young girls were taken, and 2 or 3 years later, the same raiders returned and negotiated with the Oraibi, who paid a ransom in corn and got all their girls back. After a period of quiet, the raiding groups resumed their attacks, and the settlements on the Moen-kopi were abandoned. They were reoccupied after another peace was reached, and this pattern of alternating occupancy and abandonment seems to have continued until quite recently.
While the Asa were still sojourning in Canyon de Chelly, and before the arrival of the Hano, another bloody scene had been enacted in Tusayan. Since the time of the Antelope Canyon feuds there had been enmity between Awatubi and some of the other villages, especially Walpi, and some of the Sikyatki refugees had transmitted their feudal wrongs to their descendants who dwelt in Awatubi. They had long been perpetrating all manner of offenses; they had intercepted hunting 34 parties from the other villages, seized their game, and sometimes killed the hunters; they had fallen upon men in outlying corn fields, maltreating and sometimes slaying them, and threatened still more serious outrage. Awatubi was too strong for Walpi to attack single-handed, so the assistance of the other villages was sought, and it was determined to destroy Awatubi at the close of a feast soon to occur. This was the annual “feast of the kwakwanti,” which is still maintained and is held during the month of November by each village, when the youths who have been qualified by certain ordeals are admitted to the councils. The ceremonies last several days, and on the concluding night special rites are held in the kivas. At these ceremonies every man must be in the kiva to which he belongs, and after the close of the rites they all sleep there, no one being permitted to leave the kiva until after sunrise on the following day.
While the Asa were still staying in Canyon de Chelly, and before the Hano arrived, another violent event took place in Tusayan. Since the time of the Antelope Canyon disputes, there had been hostility between Awatubi and some other villages, particularly Walpi, and some of the Sikyatki refugees had passed down their grievances to their descendants living in Awatubi. They had been committing all sorts of offenses for a long time; they had ambushed hunting parties from other villages, taken their game, and sometimes killed the hunters; they had attacked men in remote cornfields, mistreating and occasionally killing them, and had threatened even worse violence. Awatubi was too strong for Walpi to attack alone, so they sought help from the other villages and decided to wipe out Awatubi at the end of an upcoming feast. This was the annual “feast of the kwakwanti,” still celebrated today in November by each village, when the young men who have completed certain trials are allowed to join the councils. The ceremonies last several days, and on the final night, special rites are held in the kivas. During these ceremonies, every man must be in his designated kiva, and after the rites are over, they all spend the night there, with no one allowed to leave the kiva until after sunrise the next day.
There was still some little intercourse between Awatubi and Walpi, and it was easily ascertained when this feast was to be held. On the day of its close, the Walpi sent word to their allies “to prepare the war arrow and come,” and in the evening the fighting bands from the other villages assembled at Walpi, as the foray was to be led by the chief of that village. By the time night had fallen something like 150 marauders had met, all armed, of course; and of still more ominous import than their weapons were the firebrands they carried—shredded cedar bark loosely bound in rolls, resinous splinters of piñon, dry greasewood (a furze very easily ignited), and pouches full of pulverized red peppers.
There was still some small interaction between Awatubi and Walpi, and it was easy to find out when this feast would take place. On the last day of the celebration, the Walpi sent a message to their allies “to get ready the war arrow and come,” and in the evening, the fighting groups from the other villages gathered at Walpi since the chief of that village was going to lead the raid. By the time night came, around 150 raiders had assembled, all armed, of course; and even more significant than their weapons were the torches they carried—shredded cedar bark loosely rolled up, resinous piñon splinters, dry greasewood (a type of furze that ignites easily), and bags filled with crushed red peppers.
Secure in the darkness from observation, the bands followed the Walpi chief across the valley, every man with his weapons in hand and a bundle of inflammables on his back. Beaching the Awatubi mesa they cautiously crept up the steep, winding trail to the summit, and then stole round the village to the passages leading to the different courts holding the kivas, near which they hid themselves. They waited till just before the gray daylight came, then the Walpi chief shouted his war cry and the yelling bands rushed to the kivas. Selecting their positions, they were at them in a moment, and quickly snatching up the ladders through the hatchways, the only means of exit, the doomed occupants were left as helpless as rats in a trap. Fire was at hand in the numerous little cooking pits, containing the jars of food prepared for the celebrants, the inflammable bundles were lit and tossed into the kivas, and the piles of firewood on the terraced roofs were thrown down upon the blaze, and soon each kiva became a furnace. The red pepper was then cast upon the fire to add its choking tortures, while round the hatchways the assailants stood showering their arrows into the mass of struggling wretches. The fires were maintained until the roofs fell in and buried and charred the bones of the victims. It is said that every male of Awatubi who had passed infancy perished in the slaughter, not one escaping. Such of the women and children as were spared were taken out, and all the houses were destroyed, after which the captives were divided among the different villages.
Secure in the darkness, the groups followed the Walpi chief across the valley, each man armed and carrying a load of flammable materials on his back. Arriving at the Awatubi mesa, they carefully climbed the steep, winding path to the top and then moved around the village to the entrances that led to the various courtyards with the kivas, where they concealed themselves. They waited until just before dawn, then the Walpi chief yelled his war cry and the shouting groups charged toward the kivas. Choosing their spots, they reached them in an instant and quickly grabbed the ladders from the hatchways, the only way out, leaving the trapped occupants as helpless as rats in a cage. Fire was ready in the many small cooking pits, filled with food jars prepared for the celebration. The flammable bundles were ignited and thrown into the kivas, and the stacks of firewood on the terraced roofs were tossed onto the flames, turning each kiva into a furnace. Red pepper was then sprinkled onto the fire to add its choking agony, while the attackers stood around the hatchways, raining arrows into the mass of struggling victims. The fires were kept going until the roofs collapsed, burying and burning the bones of the victims. It is said that every male of Awatubi who had survived childhood was killed in the slaughter, with not one escaping. The women and children who were spared were taken out, and all the houses were destroyed, after which the captives were divided among the different villages.
35 The date of this last feudal atrocity can be made out with some degree of exactness, because in 1692, Don Diego Vargas with a military force visited Tusayan and mentions Awatubi as a populous village at which he made some halt. The Hano (Tewa) claim that they have lived in Tusayan for five or six generations, and that when they arrived there was no Awatubi in existence; hence it must have been destroyed not long after the close of the seventeenth century.
35 The date of this last feudal atrocity can be identified with some accuracy, because in 1692, Don Diego Vargas visited Tusayan with a military force and noted Awatubi as a thriving village where he stopped for a while. The Hano (Tewa) say they have lived in Tusayan for five or six generations, and that when they arrived, Awatubi didn't exist; therefore, it must have been destroyed shortly after the end of the seventeenth century.
Since the destruction of Awatubi only one other serious affray has occurred between the villages; that was between Oraibi and Walpi. It appears that after the Oraibi withdrew their colonies from the south and west they took possession of all the unoccupied planting grounds to the east of the village, and kept reaching eastward till they encroached upon some land claimed by the Walpi. This gave rise to intermittent warfare in the outlying fields, and whenever the contending villagers met a broil ensued, until the strife culminated in an attack upon Walpi. The Oraibi chose a day when the Walpi men were all in the field on the east side of the mesa, but the Walpi say that their women and dogs held the Oraibi at bay until the men came to the rescue. A severe battle was fought at the foot of the mesa, in which the Oraibi were routed and pursued across the Middle Mesa, where an Oraibi chief turned and implored the Walpi to desist. A conciliation was effected there, and harmonious relations have ever since existed between them. Until within a few years ago the spot where they stayed pursuit was marked by a stone, on which a shield and a dog were depicted, but it was a source of irritation to the Oraibi and it was removed by some of the Walpi.
Since the destruction of Awatubi, there has only been one other serious conflict between the villages; that was between Oraibi and Walpi. After the Oraibi pulled their colonies from the south and west, they took over all the unused farming land to the east of the village and continued expanding eastward until they intruded on some land claimed by the Walpi. This led to ongoing skirmishes in the surrounding fields, and whenever the villagers clashed, a fight broke out, ultimately escalating to an attack on Walpi. The Oraibi picked a day when all the Walpi men were working in the fields on the east side of the mesa, but the Walpi claim their women and dogs held the Oraibi at bay until the men arrived to help. A fierce battle took place at the foot of the mesa, in which the Oraibi were defeated and chased across the Middle Mesa, where an Oraibi chief turned and begged the Walpi to stop. A truce was reached there, and peaceful relations have existed between them ever since. Until a few years ago, the spot where the pursuit ended was marked by a stone, featuring a shield and a dog, but it became a point of tension for the Oraibi and was removed by some of the Walpi.
In the early part of the eighteenth century the Ute from the north, and the Apache from the south made most disastrous inroads upon the villages, in which Walpi especially suffered. The Navajo, who then lived upon their eastern border, also suffered severely from the same bands, but the Navajo and the Tusayan were not on the best terms and never made any alliance for a common defense against these invaders.
In the early 1700s, the Ute from the north and the Apache from the south caused devastating attacks on the villages, with Walpi being particularly hard hit. The Navajo, who lived on their eastern border, also faced heavy losses from the same groups, but the Navajo and the Tusayan didn’t get along well and never formed an alliance for mutual defense against these invaders.
Hano was peopled by a different linguistic stock from that of the other villages—a stock which belongs to the Rio Grande group. According to Polaka, the son of the principal chief, and himself an enterprising trader who has made many journeys to distant localities—and to others, the Hano once lived in seven villages on the Rio Grande, and the village in which his forefathers lived was called Tceewáge. This, it is said, is the same as the present Mexican village of Peña Blanca.
Hano was inhabited by a different language group than the other villages—a group that belongs to the Rio Grande category. According to Polaka, the son of the main chief and an ambitious trader who has traveled to many far-off places—and others—the Hano once lived in seven villages along the Rio Grande, and the village where his ancestors lived was called Tceewáge. This is said to be the same as the current Mexican village of Peña Blanca.
The Hano claim that they came to Tusayan only after repeated solicitation by the Walpi, at a time when the latter were much harassed by the Ute and Apache. The story, as told by Kwálakwai, who lives in Hano, but is not himself a Hano, begins as follows:
The Hano say they arrived in Tusayan only after the Walpi repeatedly asked them to come, during a time when the Walpi were facing a lot of trouble from the Ute and Apache. The story, as told by Kwálakwai, who lives in Hano but isn't actually a Hano himself, starts like this:
A long time ago, the Hopi’tuh were few in number and were constantly attacked by the Yútamo (Ute), Yuíttcemo (Apache), and Dacábimo (Navajo). The chiefs of the Tcuin nyumu (Snake people) and the Hánin nyumu (Bear people) gathered together, created the ba´ho (sacred plume stick), and sent one man from each group to the home of the Tewa, called Tceewádigi, which was located far away on the Múina (river) near Alavia (Santa Fé).
36 The messengers did not succeed in persuading the Tewa to come and the embassy was sent three times more. On the fourth visit the Tewa consented to come, as the Walpi had offered to divide their land and their waters with them, and set out for Tusayan, led by their own chief, the village being left in the care of his son. This first band is said to have consisted of 146 women, and it was afterwards followed by another and perhaps others.
36 The messengers weren't able to convince the Tewa to join, so the embassy was sent three more times. On the fourth visit, the Tewa agreed to come because the Walpi offered to share their land and water with them. They set out for Tusayan, led by their chief, while his son stayed behind to look after the village. This first group is said to have included 146 women, and it was later followed by another group, and possibly more.
Before the Hano arrived there had been a cessation of hostile inroads, and the Walpi received them churlishly and revoked their promises regarding the division of land and waters with them. They were shown where they could build houses for themselves on a yellow sand mound on the east side of the mesa just below the gap. They built there, but they were compelled to go for their food up to Walpi. They could get no vessels to carry their food in, and when they held out their hands for some the Walpi women mockingly poured out hot porridge and scalded the fingers of the Hano.
Before the Hano arrived, there had been a break in hostile attacks, and the Walpi welcomed them coldly and took back their promises about sharing the land and water. They were pointed to a spot where they could build houses for themselves on a yellow sand mound on the east side of the mesa, just below the gap. They built there, but they had to go to Walpi for their food. They couldn't get any containers to carry their food in, and when they reached out their hands for some, the Walpi women mockingly poured hot porridge, burning the fingers of the Hano.
After a time the Ute came down the valley on the west side of the mesa, doing great harm again, and drove off the Walpi flocks andiron Then the Hano got ready for war; they tied buckskins around their loins, whitened their legs with clay, and stained their body and arms with dark red earth (ocher). They overtook the Ute near Wípho (about 3 miles north from Hano), but the Ute had driven the flocks up the steep mesa side, and when they saw the Tewa coming they killed all the sheep and piled the carcasses up for a defense, behind which they lay down. They had a few firearms also, while the Hano had only clubs and bows and arrows; but after some fighting the Ute were driven out and the Tewa followed after them. The first Ute was killed a short distance beyond, and a stone heap still (?) marks the spot. Similar heaps marked the places where other Ute were killed as they fled before the Hano, but not far from the San Juan the last one was killed.
After a while, the Ute came down the valley on the west side of the mesa, causing a lot of destruction again, and they drove off the Walpi flocks. Then the Hano prepared for battle; they tied buckskins around their waists, covered their legs with clay, and painted their bodies and arms with dark red earth (ocher). They caught up with the Ute near Wípho (about 3 miles north of Hano), but the Ute had already driven the flocks up the steep side of the mesa, and when they saw the Tewa approaching, they killed all the sheep and piled up the carcasses as a defense behind which they lay down. The Ute had a few firearms, while the Hano were armed only with clubs and bows and arrows. However, after some fighting, the Ute were pushed out, and the Tewa chased after them. The first Ute was killed a short distance away, and a stone pile still marks that spot. Similar piles mark the spots where other Ute were killed as they fled from the Hano, but the last one was killed not far from the San Juan.
Upon the return of the Hano from this successful expedition they were received gratefully and allowed to come up on the mesa to live—the old houses built by the Asa, in the present village of Hano, being assigned to them. The land was then divided, an imaginary line between Hano and Sichumovi, extending eastward entirely across the valley, marked the southern boundary, and from this line as far north as the spot where the last Utah was killed was assigned to the Hano as their possession.
Upon the return of the Hano from this successful expedition, they were greeted with gratitude and allowed to settle on the mesa—the old houses built by the Asa, in what is now the village of Hano, were assigned to them. The land was then divided, with an imaginary line between Hano and Sichumovi marking the southern boundary, extending eastward completely across the valley. From this line to the north, up to the point where the last Utah was killed, was designated as the Hano's territory.
When the Hano first arrived, the Walpi told them, “Let us spit in your mouths, and you will learn our language,” and the Hano agreed. When the Hano moved up and built on the mesa, they said to the Walpi, “Let us spit in your mouths and you will learn our language,” but the Walpi refused, saying it would make them sick. This is why all the Hano can speak Hopí, but none of the Hopítuh can speak Hano.
The Asa and the Hano were close friends while they dwelt in New Mexico, and when they came to this region both of them were called Hánomuh by the other people of Tusayan. This term signifies the mode in which the women of these people wear their hair, cut off in front on a line with 37 the mouth and carelessly parted or hanging over the face, the back hair rolled up in a compact queue at the nape of the neck. This uncomely fashion prevails with both matron, and maid, while among the other Tusayan the matron parts her hair evenly down the head and wears it hanging in a straight queue on either side, the maidens wearing theirs in a curious discoid arrangement over each temple.
The Asa and the Hano were good friends while they lived in New Mexico, and when they came to this area, everyone in Tusayan referred to them as Hánomuh. This term refers to how the women in this community style their hair, which is cut off in front in line with the mouth and carelessly parted or draped over their faces, while the hair in the back is rolled up into a tight bun at the nape of the neck. This unattractive style is common among both married women and single girls, while the other Tusayan women part their hair evenly down the head, wearing it straight in a queue on either side, and the maidens arrange theirs in a unique disc-like style over each temple.
Although the Asa and the Hano women have the same peculiar fashion of wearing the hair, still there is no affinity of blood claimed between them. The Asa speak the same language as the other Tusayan, but the Tewa (Hano) have a quite distinct language which belongs to the Tañoan stock. They claim that the occupants of the following pueblos, in the same region of the Rio Grande, are of their people and speak the same tongue.
Although the Asa and Hano women have a similar way of styling their hair, they do not claim any blood relation. The Asa speak the same language as the other Tusayan, but the Tewa (Hano) have a completely different language that is part of the Tañoan family. They assert that the people living in the nearby pueblos along the Rio Grande are part of their group and speak the same language.
Kótite | Cochití (?). | Kápung | Santa Clara (?) |
Númi | Nambé. | Pokwádi | Pojoaque. |
Ohke | San Juan. | Tetsógi | Tesuque. |
Posówe | (Doubtless extinct.) | Also half of Taos. |
Pleasant relations existed for some time, but the Walpi again grew ill-tempered; they encroached upon the Hano planting grounds and stole their property. These troubles increased, and the Hano moved away from the mesa; they crossed the west valley and built temporary shelters. They sent some men to explore the land on the westward to find a suitable place for a new dwelling. These scouts went to the Moen-kopi, and on returning, the favorable story they told of the land they had seen determined the Tewa to go there.
Pleasant relations lasted for a while, but the Walpi became unfriendly again; they intruded on the Hano's planting areas and took their belongings. These issues escalated, leading the Hano to relocate from the mesa; they crossed the west valley and set up temporary shelters. They sent some men to scout the land to the west to find a good spot for a new home. These scouts went to Moen-kopi, and upon returning, their positive report about the land they had seen convinced the Tewa to move there.
Meanwhile some knowledge of these troubles had reached Tceewádigi, and a party of the Tewa came to Tusayan to take their friends back. This led the Hopituh to make reparation, which restored the confidence of the Hano, and they returned to the mesa, and the recently arrived party were also induced to remain. Yet even now, when the Hano (Tewa) go to visit their people on the river, the latter beseech them to come back, but the old Tewa say, “we shall stay here till our breath leaves us, then surely we shall go back to our first home to live forever.”
Meanwhile, some news about these troubles reached Tceewádigi, and a group of the Tewa came to Tusayan to bring their friends back. This prompted the Hopituh to make amends, which restored the confidence of the Hano, and they returned to the mesa. The recently arrived group was also persuaded to stay. Even now, when the Hano (Tewa) visit their people by the river, the latter urge them to come back, but the older Tewa say, “We will stay here until our last breath, then we will surely return to our original home to live forever.”
The Walpi for a long time frowned down all attempts on the part of the Hano to fraternize; they prohibited intermarriages, and in general tabued the Hano. Something of this spirit was maintained until quite recent years, and for this reason the Hano still speak their own language, and have preserved several distinctive customs, although now the most friendly relations exist among all the villages. After the Hano were quietly established in their present position the Asa returned, and the Walpi allotted them a place to build in their own village. As before mentioned, the house mass on the southeast side of Walpi, at the head of the trail leading up to the village at that point, is still occupied by Asa families, and their tenure of possession was on the condition that they should always defend that point of access and guard the south end 38 of the village. Their kiva is named after this circumstance as that of “the Watchers of the High Place.”
The Walpi long opposed any attempts by the Hano to connect with them; they banned intermarriages and generally kept the Hano at a distance. This attitude persisted until quite recently, which is why the Hano still speak their own language and have maintained several unique customs, even though today, friendly relations exist among all the villages. After the Hano settled into their current situation, the Asa returned, and the Walpi gave them a spot to build in their village. As previously mentioned, the cluster of houses on the southeast side of Walpi, at the top of the trail leading into the village, is still occupied by Asa families. They were allowed to stay there on the condition that they would always protect that entry point and guard the southern end of the village. Their kiva is named in relation to this duty as “the Watchers of the High Place.” 38
Some of the Bear and Lizard families being crowded for building space, moved from Walpi and built the first houses on the site of the present village of Sichumovi, which is named from the Sivwapsi, a shrub which formerly grew there on some mounds (chumo).
Some of the Bear and Lizard families, feeling cramped for building space, moved from Walpi and constructed the first houses where the current village of Sichumovi is located. The village is named after the Sivwapsi, a shrub that used to grow there on some mounds (chumo).
This was after the Asa had been in Walpi for some time; probably about 125 years ago. Some of the Asa, and the Badger, the latter descendants of women saved from the Awatubi catastrophe, also moved to Sichumovi, but a plague of smallpox caused the village to be abandoned shortly afterward. This pestilence is said to have greatly reduced the number of the Tusayan, and after it disappeared there were many vacant houses in every village. Sichumovi was again occupied by a few Asa families, but the first houses were torn down and new ones constructed from them.
This was after the Asa had been in Walpi for a while; probably about 125 years ago. Some of the Asa, along with the Badger, who were descendants of women saved from the Awatubi disaster, also moved to Sichumovi, but a smallpox outbreak led to the village being abandoned shortly after. This epidemic is said to have significantly decreased the number of the Tusayan, and when it was gone, there were many empty houses in every village. Sichumovi was eventually reoccupied by a few Asa families, but the original houses were demolished and replaced with new ones.
LIST OF TRADITIONARY GENTES.
In the following table the early phratries (nyu-mu) are arranged in the order of their arrival, and the direction from which each came is given, except in the case of the Bear people. There are very few representatives of this phratry existing now, and very little tradition extant concerning its early history. The table does not show the condition of these, organizations in the present community but as they appear in the traditional accounts of their coming to Tusayan, although representatives of most of them can still be found in the various villages. There are, moreover, in addition to these, many other gentes and sub-gentes of more recent origin. The subdivision, or rather the multiplication of gentes may be said to be a continuous process; as, for example, in “corn” can be found families claiming to be of the root, stem, leaf, ear, blossom, etc., all belonging to corn; but there may be several families of each of these components constituting district sub-gentes. At present there are really but four phratries recognized among the Hopituh, the Snake, Horn, Eagle, and Rain, which is indifferently designated as Water or Corn:
In the table below, the early phratries (nyu-mu) are listed in the order they arrived, along with the direction they came from, except for the Bear people. There are very few representatives of this phratry left today, and not much tradition remains about its early history. The table doesn't reflect the current state of these organizations in the community, but rather how they are described in traditional accounts of their arrival in Tusayan, even though you can still find representatives of most of them in various villages. Additionally, there are many other gentes and sub-gentes that originated more recently. The subdivision, or rather the multiplication, of gentes is an ongoing process; for example, within “corn,” you can find families that claim to represent the root, stem, leaf, ear, blossom, etc., all related to corn, but there may be several families for each of these parts forming distinct sub-gentes. Currently, there are really only four recognized phratries among the Hopituh: the Snake, Horn, Eagle, and Rain, which is also referred to as Water or Corn:
1. Ho´-nan—Bear. | ||
Ho´-nan | Bear. | |
Ko´-kyañ-a | Spider. | |
Tco´-zir | Jay. | |
He´k-pa | Fir. | |
2. Tcu´-a—Rattlesnake—from the west and north. 2. Tcu'-a—Rattlesnake—from the west and north. |
||
Tcu´-a | Rattlesnake. | |
Yu´ñ-ya | Cactus—opuntia. | |
Pü´n-e | Cactus, the species that grows in dome-like masses. | |
Ü´-se | Cactus, candelabra, or branching stemmed species. | |
He´-wi | Dove. | |
Pi-vwa´ni | Marmot. | |
Pi´h-tca | Skunk. | |
Ka-la´-ci-au-u | Raccoon. | |
3. A´-la—Horn—from the east. 3. A'la—Horn—from the east. |
||
So´-wiñ-wa | Deer. | |
Tc´ib-io | Antelope. | |
Pa´ñ-wa | Mountain sheep. | |
Kwa´-hü | Eagle. | |
Kwa´-yo | Hawk. | |
Mas-si´ kwa´-yo | Chicken hawk. | |
Tda´-wa | Sun. | |
Ka-ha´-bi | Willow. | |
Te´-bi | Greasewood. | |
5. Ka-tci´-na—Sacred, dancer—from the east. 5. Ka-tci´-na—Sacred dancer—from the east. |
||
Ka-tci´-na | Sacred dancer. | |
Gya´-zro | Parroquet. | |
Uñ-wu´-si | Raven. | |
Si-kya´-tci | Yellow bird. | |
Si-he´-bi | Cottonwood. | |
Sa-la´-bi | Spruce. | |
6. A´sa—a plant (unknown)—from the Chama. 6. A'sa—a plant (unknown)—from the Chama. |
||
A´sa | ||
Tca´-kwai-na | Black earth Katcina. | |
Pu´tc-ko-hu | Boomerang hunting stick. | |
Pi´-ca | Field mouse. | |
Hoc´-bo-a | Road runner, or chaparral cock. | |
Po-si´-o | Magpie. | |
Kwi´ñobi | Oak. | |
7. Ho-na´-ni—Badger—from the east. 7. Ho-na´-ni—Badger—from the east. |
||
Ho-na´-ni | Badger. | |
Müñ-ya´u-wu | Porcupine. | |
Wu-so´-ko | Vulture. | |
Bu´-li | Butterfly. | |
Bu-li´-so | Evening primrose. | |
Na´-hü | Medicine of all kinds; generic. | |
8. Yo´-ki—Rain—from the south. 8. Yo´-ki—Rain—from the south. |
||
Yo´-ki | Rain. | |
O´-mau | Cloud. | |
Ka´i-e | Corn. | |
Mu´r-zi-bu-si | Bean. | |
Ka-wa´i-ba-tuñ-a | Watermelon. | |
Si-vwa´-pi | Bigelovia graveolens. |
The foregoing is the Water or Rain phratry proper, but allied to them are the two following phratries, who also came to this region with the Water phratry.
The above describes the Water or Rain phratry proper, but connected to them are the next two phratries, which also arrived in this area with the Water phratry.
LIZARD. | ||
---|---|---|
Ka´-kü-tci | Species of lizards. | |
Ba-tci´p-kwa-si | ||
Na´-nan-a-wi | ||
Mo´-mo-bi | ||
Pi´-sa | White sand. | |
Tdu´-wa | Red sand. | |
Ten´-kai | Mud. | |
RABBIT. | ||
So´-wi | Jackass rabbit. | |
Tda´-bo | Cottontail rabbit. | |
Pi´-ba | Tobacco. | |
Tcoñ-o | Pipe. |
Polaka gives the following data:
Polaka provides the following data:
Te´-wa gentes and phratries. | ||||
Tewa | Hopi´tuh | Navajo. | ||
Ko´n-lo | Ka´-ai | Nata´n | Corn. | |
Cä | Pi´-ba | Na´-to | Tobacco. | |
Ke | Ho´-nau | Cac | Bear. | |
Tce´-li | Ca´-la-bi | Ts´-co | Spruce. | |
Ke´gi | Ki´-hu | Ki-a´-ni | House. | |
Tuñ | Tda´-wu | Tjon-a-ai´ | Sun. | |
O´-ku-wuñ | O´-mau | Kus | Cloud. | |
Nuñ | Tcu´-kai | Huc-klic | Mud. |
The gentes bracketed are said to “belong together,” but do not seem to have distinctive names—as phratries.
The groups mentioned are said to "belong together," but they don't appear to have unique names, like phratries.
SUPPLEMENTARY LEGEND.
An interesting ruin which occurs on a mesa point a short distance north of Mashongnavi is known to the Tusayan under the name of Payupki. There are traditions and legends concerning it among the Tusayan, but the only version that could be obtained is not regarded by the writer as being up to the standard of those incorporated in the “Summary” and it is therefore given separately, as it has some suggestive value. It was obtained through Dr. Jeremiah Sullivan, then resident in Tusayan.
An interesting ruin located on a mesa point just north of Mashongnavi is known to the Tusayan as Payupki. There are traditions and legends about it among the Tusayan, but the only version I could get isn't considered as reliable as those included in the “Summary,” so I'm presenting it separately because it has some intriguing value. This version was provided by Dr. Jeremiah Sullivan, who was living in Tusayan at the time.
The people of Payupki spoke the same language as those on the first mesa (Walpi). Long ago they lived in the north, on the San Juan, but they were compelled to abandon that region and came to a place about 20 miles northwest from Oraibi. Being compelled to leave there, they went to Canyon de Chelly, where a band of Indians from the southeast joined them, with whom they formed an alliance. Together the two tribes moved eastward toward the Jemez Mountains, whence they drifted into the valley of the Rio Grande. There they became converts to the fire-worship then prevailing, but retained their old customs and language. At the time of the great insurrection (of 1680) they sheltered the native priests that were driven from some of the Rio Grande villages, and this action created such distrust and hatred among the people that the Payupki were forced to leave their settlement. Their first stop was at Old Laguna (12 miles east of the modern village) and they had with them then some 35 or 40 of the priests. After leaving Laguna they came to Bear Spring (Fort Wingate) and had a fight there with the Apache, whom they defeated. They remained at Bear Spring for several years, until the Zuñi compelled them to move. They then attempted to reach the San Juan, but were deceived in the trail, turned to the west and came to where Pueblo Colorado is now (the present post-office of Ganado, between Fort Defiance and Keam’s Canyon). They remained there a long time, and through their success in farming became so favorably known that they were urged to come farther west. They refused, in consequence of which some Tusayan attacked them. They were captured and brought to Walpi (then on the point) and afterwards they were distributed among the villages. Previous to this capture the priests had been guiding them by feathers, smoke, and signs seen in the fire. When the priest’s omens and oracles had proved false the people were disposed to kill them, but the priests persuaded them to let it depend on a test case—offering to kill themselves in the event of failure. So they had a great feast at Awatubi. The priests had long, hollow reeds inclosing various substances—feathers, flour, corn-pollen, sacred water, native tobacco (piba), corn, beans, melon seeds, etc., and they formed in a circle at sunrise on the plaza and had their incantations and prayers. As the sun rose a priest stepped forth before the people and blew through his reed, desirous of blowing 41 that which was therein away from him, to scatter it abroad. But the wind would not blow and the contents of the reed fell to the ground. The priests were divided into groups, according to what they carried. In the evening all but two groups had blown. Then the elder of the twain turned his back eastward, and the reed toward the setting sun, and he blew, and the wind caught the feather and carried it to the west. This was accepted as a sign and the next day the Tusayan freed the slaves, giving each a blanket with corn in it. They went to the mesa where the ruin now stands and built the houses there. They asked for planting grounds, and fields were given them; but their crops did not thrive, and they stole corn from the Mashongnavi. Then, fearful lest they should be surprised at night, they built a wall as high as a man’s head about the top of their mesa, and they had big doorways, which they closed and fastened at night. When they were compelled to plant corn for themselves they planted it on the ledges of the mesa, but it grew only as high as a man’s knees; the leaves were very small and the grains grew only on one side of it. After a time they became friendly with the Mashongnavi again, and a boy from that village conceived a passion for a Payupki girl. The latter tribe objected to a marriage but the Mashongnavi were very desirous for it and some warriors of that village proposed if the boy could persuade the girl to fly with him, to aid and protect him. On an appointed day, about sundown, the girl came down from the mesa into the valley, but she was discovered by some old women who were baking pottery, who gave the alarm. Hearing the noise a party of the Mashongnavi, who were lying in wait, came up, but they encountered a party of the Payupki who had come out and a fight ensued. During the fight the young man was killed; and this caused so much bitterness of feeling that the Payupki were frightened, and remained quietly in their pueblo for several days. One morning, however, an old woman came over to Mashongnavi to borrow some tobacco, saying that they were going to have a dance in her village in five days. The next day the Payupki quietly departed. Seeing no smoke from the village the Mashongnavi at first thought that the Payupki were preparing for their dance, but on the third day a band of warriors was sent over to inquire and they found the village abandoned. The estufas and the houses of the priests were pulled down.
The people of Payupki spoke the same language as those on the first mesa (Walpi). Long ago, they lived in the north, near the San Juan River, but they had to leave that area and moved to a place about 20 miles northwest of Oraibi. After being forced to leave there, they went to Canyon de Chelly, where a group of Indians from the southeast joined them, forming an alliance. Together, the two tribes moved eastward toward the Jemez Mountains and eventually entered the valley of the Rio Grande. There, they adopted the prevalent fire-worship but kept their old customs and language. During the great insurrection of 1680, they sheltered the native priests who were expelled from some Rio Grande villages, which led to distrust and hatred among the people, forcing the Payupki to leave their settlement. Their first stop was at Old Laguna, about 12 miles east of the modern village, and they brought with them around 35 or 40 priests. After leaving Laguna, they arrived at Bear Spring (Fort Wingate) and fought the Apache there, defeating them. They stayed at Bear Spring for several years until the Zuñi forced them to move. They then tried to reach the San Juan but got misled by the trail, headed west, and arrived where Pueblo Colorado is now (the current post office of Ganado, between Fort Defiance and Keam’s Canyon). They remained there for a long time, and their farming success made them well-known, leading people to urge them to move farther west. They refused, provoking an attack from some Tusayan. They were captured and taken to Walpi (then on the point) and later distributed among the villages. Before this capture, the priests had guided them using feathers, smoke, and signs seen in the fire. When the priests' omens and oracles failed, the people were ready to kill them, but the priests convinced them to try a test case—offering to kill themselves if they failed. So, they held a big feast at Awatubi. The priests used long, hollow reeds containing various substances—feathers, flour, corn-pollen, sacred water, native tobacco (piba), corn, beans, melon seeds, etc. They formed a circle at sunrise on the plaza and conducted their incantations and prayers. As the sun rose, a priest stepped forward and blew through his reed, wanting to blow the contents away from him. But the wind didn’t cooperate, and the contents fell to the ground. The priests were grouped by what they carried. By evening, all but two groups had blown. Then the elder of the two turned his back to the east and aimed his reed towards the setting sun. He blew, and the wind caught the feather, carrying it west. This was seen as a sign, and the next day the Tusayan freed the captives, giving each a blanket with corn inside it. They went to the mesa where the ruins now stand and built houses there. They requested land for planting, and fields were provided to them, but their crops didn't thrive, leading them to steal corn from the Mashongnavi. To avoid surprise attacks at night, they built a wall as high as a man's head around the top of their mesa, with large doorways that they closed and locked at night. When they had to plant corn for themselves, they planted it on the ledges of the mesa, but it only grew knee-high, with small leaves and grains appearing on one side. Over time, they reconciled with the Mashongnavi again, and a boy from that village fell in love with a Payupki girl. The Payupki opposed the marriage, but the Mashongnavi were eager for it, and some warriors from that village promised to help and protect him if he could convince the girl to run away with him. On the agreed day, around sunset, the girl came down from the mesa into the valley, but she was seen by some old women who were baking pottery, who raised the alarm. Upon hearing the commotion, a group of Mashongnavi, who had been waiting, approached, but they ran into a group of Payupki who had come out, sparking a fight. During this clash, the young man was killed, causing deep resentment and fear among the Payupki, who stayed in their pueblo quietly for several days. One morning, however, an old woman went over to Mashongnavi to borrow some tobacco, saying they were having a dance in her village in five days. The following day, the Payupki left quietly. Seeing no smoke from the village, the Mashongnavi initially thought the Payupki were preparing for their dance, but on the third day, they sent a group of warriors to check, only to find the village abandoned. The estufas and the priests' houses had been torn down.
The narrator adds that the Payupki returned to San Felipe whence they came.
The narrator mentions that the Payupki went back to San Felipe, where they originally came from.
CHAPTER II.
RUINS AND INHABITED VILLAGES OF TUSAYAN.
PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE PROVINCE.
That portion of the southwestern plateau country comprised in the Province of Tusayan has usually been approached from the east, so that the easternmost of the series of mesas upon which the villages are situated is called the “First Mesa.” The road for 30 or 40 miles before reaching this point traverses the eastern portion of the great plateau whose broken margin, farther west, furnishes the abrupt mesa-tongues upon which the villages are built. The sandstone measures of this plateau are distinguished from many others of the southwest by their neutral colors. The vegetation consisting of a scattered growth of stunted piñon and cedar, interspersed with occasional stretches of dull-gray sage, imparts an effect of extreme monotony to the landscape. The effect is in marked contrast to the warmth and play of color frequently seen elsewhere in the plateau country.
That part of the southwestern plateau region known as the Province of Tusayan is usually accessed from the east, making the easternmost mesa where the villages are located known as the “First Mesa.” The road stretches for 30 or 40 miles before reaching this point, crossing the eastern side of the vast plateau, whose rugged edge to the west creates the steep mesa-tongues that support the villages. The sandstone layers of this plateau are different from many others in the southwest due to their neutral colors. The vegetation, made up of scattered, stunted piñon and cedar trees, along with patches of dull-gray sage, gives the landscape an extremely monotonous look. This contrasts sharply with the warmth and vibrant colors often found in other parts of the plateau country.
The plateaus of Tusayan are generally diversified by canyons and buttes, whose precipitous sides break down into long ranges of rocky talus and sandy foothills. The arid character of this district is especially pronounced about the margin of the plateau. In the immediate vicinity of the villages there are large areas that do not support a blade of grass, where barren rocks outcrop through drifts of sand or lie piled in confusion at the bases of the cliffs. The canyons that break through the margins of these mesas often have a remarkable similarity of appearance, and the consequent monotony is extremely embarrassing to the traveler, the absence of running water and clearly defined drainage confusing his sense of direction.
The plateaus of Tusayan are mostly varied with canyons and buttes, where steep sides collapse into long stretches of rocky debris and sandy hills. The dry nature of this area is especially noticeable around the edges of the plateau. Near the villages, there are large patches that don't have a single blade of grass, where barren rocks poke through sandy drifts or are piled chaotically at the bases of cliffs. The canyons that cut through the edges of these mesas often look strikingly similar, and this resulting monotony can be quite frustrating for travelers, especially since the lack of flowing water and clear drainage can confuse their sense of direction.
The occasional springs which furnish scanty water supply to the inhabitants of this region are found generally at great distances apart, and there are usually but few natural indications of their location. They often occur in obscure nooks in the canyons, reached by tortuous trails winding through the talus and foothills, or as small seeps at the foot of some mesa. The convergence of numerous Navajo trails, however, furnishes some guide to these rare water sources.
The occasional springs that provide a limited water supply to the people in this area are usually quite far apart, and there are often few natural signs pointing to where they are located. They often appear in hidden spots within the canyons, accessed by winding trails through the rocky slopes and foothills, or as small seeps at the base of a mesa. However, the junction of multiple Navajo trails offers some guidance to these rare water sources.
The series of promontories upon which the Tusayan villages are built are exceptionally rich in these seeps and springs. About the base of 43 the “First Mesa” (Fig. 1), within a distance of 4 or 5 miles from the villages located upon it, there are at least five places where water can be obtained. One of these is a mere surface reservoir, but the others appear to be permanent springs. The quantity of water, however, is so small that it produces no impression on the arid and sterile effect of the surroundings, except in its immediate vicinity. Here small patches of green, standing out in strong relief against their sandy back-grounds, mark the position of clusters of low, stunted peach trees that have obtained a foothold on the steep sand dunes.
The series of cliffs where the Tusayan villages are built are very rich in these seeps and springs. Around the base of 43 the “First Mesa” (Fig. 1), within a distance of 4 or 5 miles from the villages on it, there are at least five places where water can be found. One of these is just a surface reservoir, but the others seem to be permanent springs. However, the amount of water is so small that it doesn't really change the dry and barren feel of the surroundings, except right around it. Here, small patches of green stand out vividly against the sandy background, marking the spots where clusters of low, stunted peach trees have taken root on the steep sand dunes.
Fig. 1. View of the First Mesa.
Fig. 1. View of the First Mesa.
In the open plains surrounding the mesa rim (6,000 feet above the sea), are seen broad stretches of dusty sage brush and prickly greasewood. Where the plain rises toward the base of the mesa a scattered growth of scrub cedar and piñon begins to appear. But little of this latter growth is seen in the immediate vicinity of the villages; it is, however, the characteristic vegetation of the mesas, while, in still higher altitudes, toward the San Juan, open forests of timber are met with. This latter country seems scarcely to have come within the ancient builder’s province; possibly on account of its coldness in winter and for the reason that it is open to the incursions of warlike hunting tribes. Sage brush and greasewood grow abundantly near the villages, and these curious gnarled and twisted shrubs furnish the principal fuel of the Tusayan.
In the open plains around the mesa rim (6,000 feet above sea level), you can see wide stretches of dusty sagebrush and prickly greasewood. As the plain rises toward the base of the mesa, a scattered growth of scrub cedar and piñon starts to appear. However, there's not much of this growth close to the villages; it is, however, the typical vegetation of the mesas. At even higher altitudes, toward the San Juan, you find open forests of timber. This area seems like it was hardly touched by the ancient builders, possibly due to its cold winters and vulnerability to attacks from aggressive hunting tribes. Sagebrush and greasewood grow abundantly near the villages, and these interesting gnarled and twisted shrubs provide the main fuel for the Tusayan.
Occasionally grassy levels are seen that for a few weeks in early summer are richly carpeted with multitudes of delicate wild flowers. The beauty of these patches of gleaming color is enhanced by contrast with the forbidding and rugged character of the surroundings; but in a very short time these blossoms disappear from the arid and parched desert 44 that they have temporarily beautified. These beds of bloom are not seen in the immediate vicinity of the present villages, but are unexpectedly met with in portions of the neighboring mesas and canyons.
Occasionally, you can find grassy areas that for a few weeks in early summer are beautifully covered with countless delicate wildflowers. The beauty of these vibrant patches is heightened by the stark contrast with the harsh and rugged landscape around them; however, within a very short time, these flowers vanish from the dry and thirsty desert 44 that they have momentarily adorned. These colorful displays aren’t found near the current villages but are surprisingly encountered in some of the nearby mesas and canyons.
After crossing the 6 or 7 miles of comparatively level country that intervenes between the mouth of Keam’s Canyon and the first of the occupied mesas, the toilsome ascent begins; at first through slopes and dunes and then over masses of broken talus, as the summit of the mesa is gradually approached. Near the top the road is flanked on one side by a very abrupt descent of broken slopes, and on the other by a precipitous rocky wall that rises 30 or 40 feet above. The road reaches the brink of the promontory by a sharp rise at a point close to the village of Hano.
After crossing the 6 or 7 miles of mostly flat land between the mouth of Keam’s Canyon and the first occupied mesas, the challenging climb begins; first through slopes and dunes, then over large piles of broken rock as the top of the mesa approaches. Near the peak, the road is bordered on one side by a steep drop of jagged slopes, and on the other by a sheer rocky wall that rises 30 or 40 feet above. The road reaches the edge of the promontory by a steep incline near the village of Hano.
METHODS OF SURVEY.
Before entering upon a description of the villages and ruins, a few words as to the preparation of the plans accompanying this paper will not be amiss. The methods pursued in making the surveys of the inhabited pueblos were essentially the same throughout. The outer wall of each separate cluster was run with a compass and a tape measure, the lines being closed and checked upon the corner from which the beginning was made, so that the plan of each group stands alone, and no accumulation of error is possible. The stretched tapeline afforded a basis for estimating any deviations from a straight line which the wall presented, and as each sight was plotted on the spot these deviations are all recorded on the plan, and afford an indication of the degree of accuracy with which the building was carried out. Upon the basis thus obtained, the outlines of the second stories were drawn by the aid of measurements from the numerous jogs and angles; the same process being repeated for each of the succeeding stories. The plan at this stage recorded all the stories in outline. The various houses and clusters were connected by compass sights and by measurements. A tracing of the outline plan was then made, on which the stories were distinguished by lines of different colors, and upon this tracing were recorded all the vertical measurements. These were generally taken at every corner, although in a long wall it was customary to make additional measurements at intervening points.
Before describing the villages and ruins, it’s worth saying a few words about how the accompanying plans were prepared. The methods used to survey the inhabited pueblos were basically the same throughout. The outer wall of each separate cluster was measured with a compass and a tape measure, with the lines being closed and checked back to the starting corner, so each group’s plan stands alone and avoids any accumulation of errors. The stretched tape provided a basis for estimating any deviations from a straight line that the wall showed, and as each sight was plotted on-site, these deviations were all recorded on the plan, giving an indication of how accurately the building was constructed. Based on this information, the outlines of the second stories were drawn using measurements from the various jogs and angles, with the same process repeated for each subsequent story. At this stage, the plan depicted all the stories in outline. The different houses and clusters were connected by compass sights and measurements. A tracing of the outline plan was then created, with the stories indicated by lines of different colors, and all vertical measurements were noted on this tracing. These were usually taken at every corner, although for long walls, additional measurements were typically made at intervals.
Upon the original outline were then drawn all such details as coping stones, chimneys, trapdoors, etc., the tapeline being used where necessary to establish positions. The forms of the chimneys as well as their position and size were also indicated on this drawing, which was finally tinted to distinguish the different terraces. Upon this colored sheet were located all openings. These were numbered, and at the same time described in a notebook, in which were also recorded the necessary vertical measurements, such as their height and elevation above the ground. In the same notebook the openings were also fully described. The ladders were located upon the same sheet, and were consecutively 45 lettered and described in the notebook. This description furnishes a record of the ladder, its projection above the coping, if any, the difference in the length of its poles, the character of the tiepiece, etc. Altogether these notebooks furnish a mass of statistical data which has been of great service in the elaboration of this report and in the preparation of models. Finally, a level was carried over the whole village, and the height of each corner and jog above an assumed base was determined. A reduced tracing was then made of the plan as a basis for sketching in such details of topography, etc., as it was thought advisable to preserve.
On the original outline, all the details like coping stones, chimneys, trapdoors, and so on were added, using a tape measure where needed to establish positions. The shapes of the chimneys, along with their locations and sizes, were shown on this drawing, which was finally colored to differentiate the various terraces. All the openings were marked on this colored sheet. They were numbered and described in a notebook, which also recorded the required vertical measurements, such as their height and elevation from the ground. The openings were fully detailed in the same notebook. The ladders were placed on the same sheet and were listed alphabetically and detailed in the notebook. This description provides a record of the ladder, its projection above the coping, if there was any, the difference in the lengths of its poles, the type of tie piece, etc. Overall, these notebooks provide a wealth of statistical data that has been very useful in compiling this report and creating models. Lastly, a level was used throughout the entire village, and the height of each corner and jog above a set base was measured. A reduced tracing of the plan was then made as a foundation for sketching in any topographical details and more that were deemed important to keep.
These plans were primarily intended to be used in the construction of large scale models, and consequently recorded an amount of information that could not be reproduced upon the published drawings without causing great confusion.
These plans were mainly meant for building large-scale models, so they contained a lot of information that couldn't be shown on the published drawings without creating a lot of confusion.
The methods followed in surveying the ruins underwent some changes from time to time as the work progressed. In the earlier work the lines of the walls, so far as they could be determined, were run with a compass and tapeline and gone over with a level. Later it was found more convenient to select a number of stations and connect them by cross-sights and measurements. These points were then platted, and the walls and lines of débris were carefully drawn in over the framework of lines thus obtained, additional measurements being taken when necessary. The heights of standing walls were measured from both sides, and openings were located on the plan and described in a notebook, as was done in the survey of the inhabited villages. The entire site was then leveled, and from the data obtained contour lines were drawn with a 5-foot interval. Irregularities in the directions of walls were noted. In the later plans of ruins a scale of symbols, seven in number, were employed to indicate the amount and distribution of the débris. The plans, as published, indicate the relative amounts of débris as seen upon the ground. Probable lines of wall are shown on the plan by dotted lines drawn through the dots which indicate débris. With this exception, the plans show the ruins as they actually are. Standing walls, as a rule, are drawn in solid black; their heights appear on the field sheets, but could not be shown upon the published plans without confusing the drawing. The contour lines represent an interval of 5 feet; the few cases in which the secondary or negative contours are used will not produce confusion, as their altitude is always given in figures.
The methods used in surveying the ruins changed over time as the work progressed. Initially, the walls were mapped using a compass and tape measure, and then checked with a level. Later, it became more practical to choose several stations and link them together with cross-sights and measurements. These points were then plotted, and the walls and debris lines were carefully drawn over the framework created from the data, taking additional measurements when needed. The heights of the standing walls were measured from both sides, and openings were marked on the plan and noted in a notebook, similar to the survey of inhabited villages. The entire site was then leveled, and from the gathered data, contour lines were drawn at 5-foot intervals. Any irregularities in the wall directions were recorded. In the later plans of the ruins, a scale of seven symbols was used to indicate the amount and distribution of the debris. The published plans show the relative amounts of debris as observed on the ground. Likely wall lines are represented on the plan by dotted lines connecting the dots that signify debris. Other than that, the plans depict the ruins as they actually are. Standing walls are typically drawn in solid black; their heights are noted on the field sheets, but were not included in the published plans to avoid cluttering the drawing. The contour lines represent 5-foot intervals; the few instances where secondary or negative contours are used won't cause confusion, as their elevations are always provided in numbers.
PLANS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF RUINS.
The ruins described in this chapter comprise but a few of those found within the province of Tusayan. These were surveyed and recorded on account of their close traditional connection with the present villages, and for the sake of the light that they might throw upon the relation of the modern pueblos to the innumerable stone buildings of unknown date so widely distributed over the southwestern plateau country. Such 46 traditional connection with the present peoples could probably be established for many more of the ruins of this country by investigations similar to those conducted by Mr. Stephen in the Tusayan group; but this phase of the subject was not included in our work. In the search for purely architectural evidence among these ruins it must be confessed that the data have proved disappointingly meager. No trace of the numerous constructive details that interest the student of pueblo architecture in the modern villages can be seen in the low mounds of broken down masonry that remain in most of the ancient villages of Tusayan. But little masonry remains standing in even the best preserved of these ruins, and villages known to have been occupied within two centuries are not distinguishable from the remains to which distinct tradition (save that they were in the same condition when the first people of the narrators’ gens came to this region) no longer clings. Though but little architectural information is to be derived from these ruins beyond such as is conveyed by the condition and character of the masonry and the general distribution of the plan, the plans and relation to the topography are recorded as forming, in connection with the traditions, a more complete account than can perhaps be obtained later.
The ruins discussed in this chapter represent just a few of those located in the province of Tusayan. They were examined and documented because of their strong traditional ties to the current villages, and to shed light on how modern pueblos relate to the countless stone structures of unknown age spread across the southwestern plateau region. Such 46 traditional ties with today’s communities could likely be established for many more ruins in this area through investigations similar to those carried out by Mr. Stephen in the Tusayan group; however, this aspect of the topic wasn’t included in our research. When searching for purely architectural evidence among these ruins, it must be admitted that the information has been frustratingly scant. There’s no sign of the many construction details that intrigue those studying pueblo architecture in today's villages within the low mounds of crumbled masonry that remain in most of the ancient Tusayan villages. Very little masonry remains standing, even in the best-preserved ruins, and villages known to have been inhabited within the last two centuries are indistinguishable from the remains that no longer have distinct traditional associations (except that they were in the same state when the original people of the narrators’ group arrived in this area). Although there’s only limited architectural information available from these ruins beyond what can be inferred from the condition and characteristics of the masonry and the overall layout, these plans and their relation to the topography are recorded to form, along with the traditions, a more complete account than might be gathered later.
In our study of architectural details, when a comparison is suggested between the practice at Tusayan and that of the ancient builders, our illustrations for the latter must often be drawn from other portions of the builders’ territory where better preserved remains furnish the necessary data.
In our study of architectural details, when we compare the practices at Tusayan with those of the ancient builders, we often have to use illustrations from different areas of the builders' territory where the remains are better preserved and provide the needed information.
WALPI RUINS.
In the case of the pueblo of Walpi, a portion of whose people seem to have been the first comers in this region, a number of changes of sites have taken place, at least one of which has occurred within the historic period. Of the various sites occupied one is pointed out north of the gap on the first mesa. At the present time this site is only a low mound of sand-covered débris with no standing fragment of wall visible. The present condition of this early Walpi is illustrated in Fig. 2. In the absence of foundation walls or other definite lines, the character of the site is expressed by the contour lines that define its relief. Another of the sites occupied by the Walpi is said to have been in the open valley separating the first from the second mesa, but here no trace of the remains of a stone village has been discovered. This traditional location is referred to by Mr. Stephen in his account of Walpi. The last site occupied previous to the present one on the mesa summit was on a lower bench of the first mesa promontory at its southern extremity. Here the houses are said to have been distributed over quite a large area, and occasional fragments of masonry are still seen at widely separated points; but the ground plan can not now be traced. This was the site of a Spanish mission, and some of the Tusayan point out the position formerly occupied by mission buildings, but no architectural evidence of such structures is visible. It seems to be fairly certain, however, that 47 this was the site of Walpi at a date well within the historic period, although now literally there is not one stone upon another. The destruction in this instance has probably been more than usually complete on account of the close proximity of the succeeding pueblo, making the older remains a very convenient stone quarry for the construction of the houses on the mesa summit. Of the three abandoned sites of Walpi referred to, not one furnishes sufficient data for a suggestion of a ground plan or of the area covered.
In the case of the pueblo of Walpi, where some of the earliest settlers in this region lived, several relocations have happened, at least one of which took place during historic times. Among the different sites occupied, one is located north of the gap on the first mesa. Currently, this site is just a low mound of sand-covered debris with no visible walls left. The current state of this early Walpi is shown in Fig. 2. Without any foundation walls or clear outlines, the site's character is shown through the contour lines that define its shape. Another site where the Walpi lived is believed to have been in the open valley between the first and second mesa, but no signs of a stone village have been found there. Mr. Stephen mentions this traditional location in his account of Walpi. The last site occupied before the current one on the mesa summit was on a lower ledge of the first mesa at its southern end. Here, the houses were reportedly spread over a large area, and remnants of masonry can still be found at various spots, but the layout cannot be traced today. This was the site of a Spanish mission, and some people from Tusayan indicate where the mission buildings used to be, but there’s no visible architectural evidence of such structures. However, it seems fairly certain that 47 this was the site of Walpi at a time well within the historic period, even though now there isn’t a single stone left standing. The destruction here has likely been especially thorough due to the close proximity of the newer pueblo, which made the old remains a convenient source of stones for building the houses on the mesa summit. Of the three abandoned Walpi sites mentioned, none provides enough information to suggest a ground plan or the area they covered.
Fig. 2. Ruins, Old Walpi mound.
Fig. 2. Ruins, Old Walpi site.
OLD MASHONGNAVI.
In the case of Mashongnavi we have somewhat more abundant material. It will be desirable to quote a few lines of narrative from the account of a Mashongnavi Indian of the name of Nuvayauma, as indicating the causes that led to the occupation of the site illustrated.
In the case of Mashongnavi, we have a bit more material to work with. It would be useful to quote a few lines from the story of a Mashongnavi Indian named Nuvayauma, as this illustrates the reasons behind the occupation of the site shown.
We turned and headed north, where we encountered the Apache and “Beaver Indians.” We fought many battles with them, and since we were outnumbered, we were defeated. After that, we arrived at Mashongnavi [the ruin at the “Giant’s Chair”], named that rock [name not known], and built our homes there. The Apache attacked us again, along with the Comanche, and then we moved to [Old Mashóngnavi]. We lived there peacefully for many years, experiencing great success with our crops, and our population grew. Eventually, the Apache came in large numbers, set fire to our houses, and burned our corn, which you can still see today, blackened and charred. After they destroyed our homes, we moved to the mesa, where we have lived ever since.
The ruins referred to as having been the first occupied by the Mashongnavi at a large isolated rock known as the “Giant’s Chair,” have not been examined. The later village from which they were driven by the attacks of the Apache to their present site has been surveyed. The plan of the fallen walls and lines of débris by which the form of much of the old pueblo can still be traced is given in Pl. II. The plan of the best preserved portion of the pueblo towards the north end of the sheet clearly indicates a general adherence to the inclosed court arrangement with about the same degree of irregularity that characterizes the modern village. Besides the clearly traceable portions of the ruin that bear such resemblance to the present village in arrangement, several small groups and clusters appear to have been scattered along the slope of the foothills, but in their present state of destruction it is not clear whether these clusters were directly connected with the principal group, or formed part of another village. Occasional traces of foundation walls strongly suggest such connection, although from the character of the site this intervening space could hardly have been closely built over. With the exception of the main cluster above described the houses occupy very broken and irregular sites. As indicated on the plan, the slope is broken by huge irregular masses of sandstone protruding from the soil, while much of the surface is covered by scattered fragments that have fallen from neighboring pinnacles and ledges. The contours indicate the general character of the slopes over which these irregular features are disposed. The fragment of ledge shown on the north end of the plate, against which a part of the main cluster has been built, is a portion of a broad massive ledge of sandstone that supports the low buttes upon which the present villages of Mashongnavi and Shupaúlovi are built, and continues as a broad, level shelf of solid rock for several miles along the mesa promontory. Its continuation on the side opposite that shown in the plate may be seen in the general view of Shupaulovi (Pl. XXXI).
The ruins known to be the first occupied by the Mashongnavi at a large isolated rock called the “Giant’s Chair” have not been explored. The later village, which they fled from due to Apache attacks, has been surveyed. The layout of the fallen walls and debris that outline much of the old pueblo is shown in Pl. II. The layout of the best-preserved section of the pueblo at the north end of the sheet indicates a general adherence to the enclosed courtyard arrangement, similar to the layout of the modern village. In addition to the clearly identifiable parts of the ruins that resemble the current village in layout, several small groups and clusters seem to have been scattered along the foothills' slope. However, due to their current state of decay, it’s unclear if these clusters were connected to the main group or part of another village. Some signs of foundation walls strongly suggest such a connection, though given the nature of the site, this intervening space likely wasn't densely built over. Apart from the main cluster described, the houses are located on very uneven and irregular ground. As shown on the plan, the slope features massive irregular sandstone outcrops jutting out from the soil, while much of the surface is littered with fragments that have fallen from nearby cliffs and ledges. The contours highlight the general shape of the slopes where these irregular features are situated. The ledge fragment displayed at the north end of the plate, against which part of the main cluster is built, is part of a broad, massive sandstone ledge that supports the low buttes on which the current villages of Mashongnavi and Shupaúlovi are constructed, extending as a broad, level shelf of solid rock for several miles along the mesa's edge. Its continuation on the opposite side, not shown in the plate, can be observed in the overall view of Shupaulovi (Pl. XXXI).
SHITAIMUVI.
The vestiges of another ruined village, known as Shitaimuvi, are found in the vicinity of Mashongnavi, occupying and covering the crown of a rounded foothill on the southeast side of the mesa. No plan of this ruin could be obtained on account of the complete destruction of the walls. No line of foundation stones even could be found, although the whole area is more or less covered with the scattered stones of former masonry. An exceptional quantity of pottery fragments is also strewn 49 over the surface. These bear a close resemblance to the fine class of ware characteristic of “Talla Hogan” or “Awatubi,” and would suggest that this pueblo was contemporaneous with the latter. Some reference to this ruin win be found in the traditionary material in Chapter I.
The remnants of another destroyed village, called Shitaimuvi, can be found near Mashongnavi, sitting atop a rounded foothill on the southeast side of the mesa. A detailed layout of this ruin couldn't be obtained due to the complete destruction of the walls. There weren't even any foundation stones visible, although the entire area is somewhat covered with scattered stones from what used to be masonry. An unusually large amount of pottery fragments is also scattered across the surface. These pieces look a lot like the high-quality pottery typical of “Talla Hogan” or “Awatubi,” which suggests that this pueblo existed at the same time as the latter. Some information about this ruin can be found in the traditional material in Chapter I.
AWATUBI.
The ruin of Awatubi is known to the Navajo as Talla Hogan, a term interpreted as meaning “singing house” and thought to refer to the chapel and mission that at one time nourished here, as described by Mr. Stephen in Chapter I. Tradition ascribes great importance to this village. At the time of the Spanish conquest it was one of the most prosperous of the seven “cities” of Tusayan, and was selected as the site of a mission, a distinction shared by Walpi, which was then on a lower spur of the first mesa, and by Shumopavi, which also was built on a lower site than the present village of that name. Traditions referring to this pueblo have been collected from several sources and, while varying somewhat in less important details, they all concur in bringing the destruction of the village well within the period of Spanish occupation.
The ruins of Awatubi are known to the Navajo as Talla Hogan, which means “singing house” and is thought to refer to the chapel and mission that once thrived here, as mentioned by Mr. Stephen in Chapter I. This village holds great significance in tradition. At the time of the Spanish conquest, it was one of the wealthiest of the seven “cities” of Tusayan and was chosen as the site for a mission, a distinction it shared with Walpi, which was then on a lower part of the first mesa, and Shumopavi, which was also built at a lower elevation than the current village of that name. Various traditions about this pueblo have been gathered from different sources, and although they differ in some minor details, they all agree that the village was destroyed during the period of Spanish occupation.
Plate IV. Awatubi (Talla-Hogan), plan.
Plate IV. Awatubi (Talla-Hogan), map.
On the historical site, too, we know that Cruzate on the occasion of the attempted reconquest of the country visited this village in 1692, and the ruin must therefore be less than two centuries old, yet the completeness of destruction is such that over most of its area no standing wall is seen, and the outlines of the houses and groups are indicated mainly by low ridges and masses of broken-down masonry, partly covered by the drifting sands. The group of rooms that forms the south east side of the pueblo is an exception to the general rule. Here fragmentary walls of rough masonry stand to a height, in some cases, of 8 feet above the débris. The character of the stonework, as may be seen from Pl. V, is but little better than that of the modern villages. This better preserved portion of the village seems to have formed part of a cluster of mission buildings. At the points designated A on the ground plan may be seen the remnants of walls that have been built of straw adobe in the typical Spanish manner. These rest upon foundations of stone masonry. See Pl. VI. The adobe fragments are probably part of the church or associated buildings. At two other points on the ground plan, both on the northeast side, low fragments of wall are still standing, as may be seen from the plate. At one of these points the remains indicate that the village was provided with a gateway near the middle of the northeast side.
On the historical site, we know that Cruzate visited this village in 1692 during the attempted reconquest of the country, and the ruins must be less than two centuries old. However, the level of destruction is so extensive that there are no standing walls in most areas, and the outlines of the houses and groups are mostly marked by low ridges and piles of broken masonry, partly covered by drifting sands. The group of rooms that make up the southeast side of the pueblo is an exception to this pattern. Here, fragmentary walls of rough masonry stand up to 8 feet above the debris in some places. The quality of the stonework, as seen in Pl. V, isn't much better than that of modern villages. This better-preserved part of the village seems to have been part of a cluster of mission buildings. At points marked A on the ground plan, you can see remnants of walls that were built using straw adobe in the traditional Spanish way. These are built on stone masonry foundations. See Pl. VI. The adobe fragments likely come from the church or nearby buildings. At two other points on the ground plan, both on the northeast side, low wall fragments are still standing, as shown in the plate. One of these points indicates that the village had a gateway near the center of the northeast side.
Plate V. Standing walls of Awatubi.
Plate V. Awatubi Walls.
The general plan of this pueblo is quite different from that of the present villages, and approaches the older types in symmetry and compactness. There is a notable absence of the arrangement of rooms into long parallel rows. This typical Tusayan feature is only slightly approximated in some subordinate rows within the court. The plan suggests that the original pueblo was built about three sides of a rectangular 50 court, the fourth or southeast side—later occupied by the mission buildings—being left open, or protected only by a low wall. Outside the rectangle of the main pueblo, on the northeast side, are two fragments of rude masonry, built by Navajo sheep herders. Near the west corner of the pueblo are the vestiges of two rooms, outside the pueblo proper, which seem to belong to the original construction.
The overall layout of this pueblo is quite different from that of today’s villages and resembles older styles in its balance and compactness. There’s a clear lack of rooms arranged in long, straight rows. This common Tusayan feature is only slightly seen in some smaller rows within the courtyard. The layout indicates that the original pueblo was constructed on three sides of a rectangular 50 courtyard, with the fourth or southeast side—later taken over by the mission buildings—being left open or only guarded by a low wall. Outside the main pueblo’s rectangle, on the northeast side, there are two sections of rough masonry built by Navajo sheep herders. Near the west corner of the pueblo are the remains of two rooms outside the main structure, which seem to be part of the original build.
Plate VI. Adobe fragment in Awatubi.
Plate VI. Adobe fragment in Awatubi.
Awatubi is said to have had excavated rectangular kivas, situated in the open court, similar to those used in the modern village. The people of Walpi had partly cleared out one of these chambers and used it as a depository for ceremonial plume-sticks, etc., but the Navajo came and carried off their sacred deposits, tempted probably by their market value as ethnologic specimens. No trace of these kivas was visible at the time the ruins were surveyed.
Awatubi is reported to have had rectangular kivas dug out in the open court, similar to those used in the current village. The people of Walpi had partially cleaned out one of these chambers and used it to store ceremonial plume sticks and other items, but the Navajo came and took their sacred belongings, likely attracted by their market value as ethnological artifacts. No signs of these kivas were visible when the ruins were surveyed.
The Awatubi are said to have had sheep at the time the village was destroyed. Some of the Tusayan point out the remains of a large sheep corral near the spring, which they say was used at that time, but it is quite as likely to have been constructed for that purpose at a much later date.
The Awatubi are said to have had sheep when the village was destroyed. Some people from Tusayan point out the remains of a large sheep corral near the spring, which they claim was used back then, but it's just as possible that it was built for that purpose much later.
HORN HOUSE.
The Horn House is so called because tradition connects this village with some of the people of the Horn phratry of the Hopituh or Tusayan. The ruin is situated on a projecting point of the mesa that forms the western flank of Jeditoh Valley, not far from where the Holbrook road to Keam’s Canyon ascends the brink of the mesa. The village is almost completely demolished, no fragment of standing wall remaining in place. Its general plan and distribution are quite clearly indicated by the usual low ridges of fallen masonry partly covered by drifted sand. There is but little loose stone scattered about, the sand having filled in all the smaller irregularities.
The Horn House gets its name because tradition links this village to some people from the Horn group of the Hopituh or Tusayan. The ruins are located on a jutting point of the mesa that makes up the western side of Jeditoh Valley, not far from where the Holbrook road to Keam’s Canyon climbs the edge of the mesa. The village is nearly entirely destroyed, with no standing walls left. Its overall layout and arrangement are clearly shown by the usual low mounds of collapsed masonry, which are partly covered by drifted sand. There are very few loose stones scattered around, as the sand has filled in most of the smaller uneven spots.
It will be seen from the plan, Pl. VII, that the village has been built close to the edge of the mesa, following to some extent the irregularities of its outline. The mesa ruin at this point, however, is not very high, the more abrupt portion having a height of 20 or 30 feet. Near the north end of the village the ground slopes very sharply toward the east and is rather thickly covered with the small stones of fallen masonry, though but faint vestiges of rooms remain. In plan the ruin is quite elongated, following the direction of the mesa. The houses were quite irregularly disposed, particularly in the northern portion of the ruin. But here the indications are too vague to determine whether the houses were originally built about one long court or about two or more smaller ones. The south end of the pueblo, however, still shows a well defined court bounded on all sides by clearly traceable rooms. At the extreme south end of the ruin the houses have very irregular outlines, a result of their adaptation to the topography, as may be seen in the illustration.
It can be seen from the plan, Pl. VII, that the village has been built close to the edge of the mesa, somewhat following its irregular shape. However, the mesa ruin here isn’t very high, with the steeper part reaching 20 or 30 feet. Near the northern end of the village, the ground drops sharply toward the east and is fairly covered with small stones from fallen walls, though very faint traces of rooms remain. In terms of layout, the ruin is quite elongated, aligning with the mesa. The houses are arranged quite irregularly, especially in the northern part of the ruin. But here the signs are too unclear to tell if the houses were originally clustered around one long courtyard or several smaller ones. The southern end of the pueblo, however, still shows a well-defined courtyard surrounded on all sides by clearly visible rooms. At the far southern end of the ruin, the houses have very irregular shapes, a result of their adaptation to the landscape, as illustrated.
The plan shows the position of a small group of cottonwood trees, just below the edge of the mesa and nearly opposite the center of the 51 village. These trees indicate the proximity of water, and mark the probable site of the spring that furnished this village with at least part of its water supply.
The plan shows the location of a small cluster of cottonwood trees, just below the edge of the mesa and almost directly across from the center of the 51 village. These trees signify the closeness of water and indicate the likely spot of the spring that provided this village with at least some of its water supply.
There are many fragments of pottery on this spot, but they are not so abundant as at Awatubi.
There are many pieces of pottery in this spot, but they aren't as plentiful as at Awatubi.
Two partly excavated rooms were seen at this ruin, the work of some earlier visitors who hoped to discover ethnologic or other treasure.
Two partially dug-out rooms were found at this ruin, the result of some earlier visitors who hoped to uncover ethnological or other treasures.
These afforded no special information, as the character of the masonry exposed differed in no respect from that seen at other of the Tusayan ruins. No traces of adobe construction or suggestions of foreign influence were seen at this ruin.
These provided no additional information, as the type of masonry exposed was no different from what is seen at other Tusayan ruins. There were no signs of adobe construction or any hints of outside influence at this ruin.
SMALL RUIN BETWEEN HORN HOUSE AND BAT HOUSE.
On a prolongation of the mesa occupied by the Horn House, midway between it and another ruined pueblo known as the Bat House, occur the remains of a small and compact cluster of houses (Fig. 3). It is situated on the very mesa edge, here about 40 feet high, at the head of a small canyon which opens into the Jeditoh Valley, a quarter of a mile below.
On an extension of the mesa where the Horn House is located, halfway between it and another ruined pueblo called the Bat House, there are the remnants of a small, tight-knit group of houses (Fig. 3). It's positioned right on the edge of the mesa, which is about 40 feet high here, at the entrance of a small canyon that leads into the Jeditoh Valley, a quarter of a mile below.
Fig. 3. Ruin between Bat House and Horn House.
Fig. 3. Ruin located between Bat House and Horn House.
The site affords an extended outlook to the south over a large part of Jeditoh Valley. The topography about this point, which receives the drainage of a considerable area of the mesa top, would fit it especially for the establishment of a reservoir. This fact probably had much 52 to do with its selection as a dwelling site. The masonry is in about the same state of preservation as that of the Horn House, and some of the stones of the fallen walls seem to have been washed down from the mesa edge to the talus below.
The location offers a wide view to the south over a large part of Jeditoh Valley. The landscape here, which collects water from a significant area of the mesa above, would make it particularly suitable for building a reservoir. This likely played a big role in choosing it as a place to live. The masonry is in about the same condition as that of the Horn House, and some of the stones from the collapsed walls appear to have been washed down from the mesa edge to the slope below.
BAT HOUSE.
The Bat House is a ruin of nearly the same size as the Horn House, although in its distribution it does not follow the mesa edge so closely as the latter, and is not so elongated in its general form. The northern portion is quite irregular, and the rooms seem to have been somewhat crowded. The southern half, with only an occasional room traceable, as indicated on the plan, Pl. VIII, still shows that the rooms were distributed about a large open court.
The Bat House is a ruin that's almost the same size as the Horn House, but it doesn't line up with the mesa edge as closely as the Horn House does, and its overall shape isn't as elongated. The northern section is pretty irregular, and the rooms seem to be a bit cramped. The southern half, with only a few rooms identifiable, as shown on the plan, Pl. VIII, still indicates that the rooms were arranged around a large open court.
Plate VIII. Bat House.
Plate VIII. Bat House.
The Bat House is situated on the northwest side of the Jeditoh Valley, on part of the same mesa occupied by the two ruins described above. It occupies the summit of a projecting spur, overlooking the main valley for an extent of more than 5 miles. The ruin lies on the extreme edge of the cliff, here about 200 feet high, and lying beneath it on the east and south are large areas of arable land. Altogether it forms an excellent defensive site, combined with a fair degree of convenience to fields and water from the Tusayan point of view.
The Bat House is located on the northwest side of the Jeditoh Valley, on part of the same mesa that has the two ruins mentioned earlier. It sits at the top of a jutting spur, overlooking the main valley for more than 5 miles. The ruin is on the very edge of a cliff, which is about 200 feet high, and below it to the east and south are large areas of cultivable land. Overall, it creates a great defensive location while still being fairly convenient to fields and water from the Tusayan perspective.
This ruin, near its northeastern extremity, contains a feature that is quite foreign to the architecture of Tusayan, viz, a defensive wall. It is the only instance of the use by the Hopituh of an inclosing wall, though it is met with again at Payupki (Pl. XIII), which, however, was built by people from the Rio Grande country.
This ruin, located near its northeastern edge, has a feature that is unusual for Tusayan architecture: a defensive wall. It’s the only case of the Hopituh using an enclosing wall, although a similar feature appears again at Payupki (Pl. XIII), which, however, was constructed by people from the Rio Grande region.
MISHIPTONGA.
Mishiptonga is the Tusayan name for the southernmost, and by far the largest, of the Jeditoh series of ruins (Pl. IX). It occurs quite close to the Jeditoh spring which gives its name to the valley along whose northern and western border are distributed the ruins above described, beginning with the Horn house.
Mishiptonga is the Tusayan name for the southernmost and, by far, the largest of the Jeditoh series of ruins (Pl. IX). It is located near the Jeditoh spring, which names the valley along its northern and western borders, where the described ruins start, beginning with the Horn house.
This village is rather more irregular in its arrangement than any other of the series. There are indications of a number of courts inclosed by large and small clusters of rooms, very irregularly disposed, but with a general trend towards the northeast, being roughly parallel with the mesa edge. In plan this village approaches somewhat that of the inhabited Tusayan villages. At the extreme southern extremity of the mesa promontory is a small secondary bench, 20 feet lower than the site of the main village. This bench has also been occupied by a number of houses. On the east side the pueblo was built to the very edge of the bluff, where small fragments of masonry are still standing. The whole village seems so irregular and crowded in its arrangement that it suggests a long period of occupancy and growth, much more than do the other villages of this (Jeditoh) group.
This village is more irregularly arranged than any of the others in the series. There are signs of several courtyards surrounded by clusters of rooms in a very haphazard layout, but they generally trend toward the northeast, roughly parallel to the edge of the mesa. In terms of layout, this village is somewhat similar to the inhabited Tusayan villages. At the far southern tip of the mesa promontory, there's a small secondary ledge that's 20 feet lower than the main village site. This ledge has also been home to several houses. On the east side, the pueblo is built right at the edge of the bluff, where small pieces of masonry are still visible. The whole village appears so irregular and packed that it suggests a long history of occupation and growth, much more so than the other villages in this (Jeditoh) group.
53 The pueblo may have been abandoned or destroyed prior to the advent of the Spaniards in this country, as claimed by the Indians, for no traditional mention of it is made in connection with the later feuds and wars that figure so prominently in the Tusayan oral history of the last three centuries. The pueblo was undoubtedly built by some of the ancient gentes of the Tusayan stock, as its plan, the character of the site chosen, and, where traceable, the quality of workmanship link it with the other villages of the Jeditoh group.
53 The pueblo might have been abandoned or destroyed before the Spaniards arrived in this country, as the Indians claim, since there’s no mention of it in connection with the later conflicts and wars that are so important in the Tusayan oral history of the last three centuries. The pueblo was definitely built by some of the ancient people of the Tusayan group, as its layout, the choice of location, and, where identifiable, the quality of craftsmanship connect it to the other villages in the Jeditoh group.
Plate X. A small ruin near Moen-kopi.
Plate X. A small ruin near Moen-kopi.
MOEN-KOPI RUINS.
A very small group of rooms, even smaller than the neighboring farming pueblo of Moen-kopi, is situated on the western edge of the mesa summit about a quarter of a mile north of the modern village of Moen-kopi. As the plan shows (Fig. 4), the rooms were distributed in three rows around a small court. This ruin also follows the general northeastern trend which has been noticed both in the ruined and in the occupied pueblos of Tusayan. The rows here were only one room deep and not more than a single story high at any point, as indicated by the very small amount of débris. As the plate shows, nearly the entire plan is clearly defined by fragments of standing walls. The walls are built of thin tablets of the dark-colored sandstone which caps the mesa. Where the walls have fallen the débris is comparatively free 54 from earth, indicating that adobe has been sparingly used. The walls, in places standing to a height of 2 or 3 feet, as may be seen in the illustration, Pl. X, show unusual precision of workmanship and finish, resembling in this respect some of the ancient pueblos farther north. This is to some extent due to the exceptional suitability of the tabular stones of the mesa summit. The almost entire absence of pottery fragments and other objects of art which are such a constant accompaniment of the ruins throughout this region strongly suggest that it was occupied for a very short time. In Chapter III it will be shown that a similar order of occupation took place at Ojo Caliente, one of the Zuñi farming villages. This ruin is probably of quite recent origin, as is the present village of Moen-kopi, although it may possibly have belonged to an earlier colony of which we have no distinct trace. This fertile and well watered valley, a veritable garden spot in the Tusayan deserts, must have been one of the first points occupied. Some small cliff-dwellings, single rooms in niches of a neighboring canyon wall, attest the earlier use of the valley for agricultural purposes, although it is doubtful whether these rude shelters date back of the Spanish invasion of the province.
A very small group of rooms, even smaller than the nearby farming pueblo of Moen-kopi, is located on the western edge of the mesa summit about a quarter of a mile north of the modern village of Moen-kopi. As the plan shows (Fig. 4), the rooms are arranged in three rows around a small courtyard. This ruin also follows the general northeastern trend seen in both the ruined and occupied pueblos of Tusayan. The rows here are only one room deep and no more than a single story high at any point, as indicated by the small amount of debris. As the plate shows, nearly the entire plan is clearly defined by fragments of standing walls. The walls are made of thin slabs of the dark-colored sandstone that caps the mesa. Where the walls have fallen, the debris is relatively free of earth, suggesting that adobe was used sparingly. The walls, in places standing 2 to 3 feet high, as shown in the illustration, Pl. X, demonstrate unusual precision in workmanship and finish, resembling some of the ancient pueblos further north. This is partly due to the exceptional suitability of the flat stones from the mesa summit. The almost complete absence of pottery fragments and other artistic objects, which are commonly found with ruins throughout this region, strongly suggests that it was occupied for a very short time. In Chapter III, it will be shown that a similar pattern of occupation occurred at Ojo Caliente, one of the Zuñi farming villages. This ruin is likely of quite recent origin, like the present village of Moen-kopi, although it may have belonged to an earlier colony of which we have no distinct evidence. This fertile and well-watered valley, a true garden spot in the Tusayan deserts, must have been one of the first areas occupied. Some small cliff dwellings, single rooms in niches of a nearby canyon wall, indicate earlier use of the valley for agricultural purposes, although it's uncertain whether these simple shelters predate the Spanish invasion of the province.
Fig. 4. Ruin near Moen-kopi, plan.
Fig. 4. Plan of ruins near Moen-kopi.
A close scrutiny of the many favorable sites in this vicinity would probably reveal the sand-encumbered remains of some more important settlement than any of those now known.
A close look at the many good locations around here would likely uncover the sand-covered remnants of a more significant settlement than any of those we currently know about.
RUINS ON THE ORAIBI WASH.
The wagon road from Keam’s Canyon to Tuba City crosses the Oraibi wash at a point about 7 miles above the village of Oraibi. As it enters a branch canyon on the west side of the wash it is flanked on each side by rocky mesas and broken ledges. On the left or west side a bold promontory, extending southward, is quite a conspicuous feature of the landscape. The entire flat mesa summit, and much of the slope of a rocky butte that rises from it, are covered with the remains of a small pueblo, as shown on the plan, Fig. 5. All of this knoll except its eastern side is lightly covered with scattered débris. On the west and north sides there are many large masses of broken rock distributed over the slope. There is no standing wall visible from below, but on closer approach several interesting specimens of masonry are seen. On the north side, near the west end, there is a fragment of curved wall which follows the margin of the rock on which it is built. It is about 8 or 10 feet long and 3 feet high on the outer side. The curve is carefully executed and the workmanship of the masonry good. Farther east, and still on the north side, there is a fragment of masonry exhibiting a reversed curve. This piece of wall spans the space between two adjoining rocks, and the top of the wall is more than 10 feet above the rock on which it stands. The shape of this wall and its relation to the surroundings are indicated on the plan, Fig. 5. On the south side of the ruin on the mesa surface, and near an outcropping rock, are the remains 55 of what appears to have been a circular room, perhaps 8 or 10 feet in diameter, though it is too much broken down to determine this accurately. Only a small portion of the south wall can be definitely traced. On the south slope of the mesa are indications of walls, too vaguely defined to admit of the determination of their direction. Similar vestiges of masonry are found on the north and west, but not extending to as great a distance from the knoll as those on the south.
The road from Keam’s Canyon to Tuba City crosses the Oraibi wash about 7 miles above the village of Oraibi. As it enters a side canyon on the west side of the wash, it’s surrounded on both sides by rocky mesas and jagged ledges. On the left, or west side, a prominent cliff extending southward stands out in the landscape. The entire flat top of the mesa, along with much of the slope of a rocky butte rising from it, is covered with the remains of a small pueblo, as shown in the plan, Fig. 5. All of this knoll, except its eastern side, is lightly scattered with debris. On the west and north sides, there are many large chunks of broken rock spread across the slope. From below, no standing wall is visible, but if you get closer, several interesting examples of masonry can be seen. On the north side, near the west end, there's a piece of curved wall that follows the edge of the rock it’s built on. It's about 8 or 10 feet long and 3 feet high on the outside. The curve is well done, and the masonry work is good. Further east, still on the north side, there’s a piece of masonry showing a reversed curve. This section of wall spans the gap between two adjacent rocks, and the top of the wall is over 10 feet above the rock underneath it. The shape of this wall and its relation to the surroundings are shown in the plan, Fig. 5. On the south side of the ruins on the mesa, near an outcropping rock, are the remains of what seems to have been a circular room, maybe 8 or 10 feet in diameter, though it’s too damaged to tell for sure. Only a small part of the south wall can be clearly seen. On the south slope of the mesa, there are signs of walls that are too indistinct to determine their direction. Similar remnants of masonry can be found on the north and west sides, but they don’t extend as far from the knoll as those on the south.
Fig. 5. Ruin 7 miles north of Oraibi.
Fig. 5. Ruin 7 miles north of Oraibi.
In that portion of the ruin which lies on top of the knoll, the walls so far as traced conform to the shape of the site. The ground plan of the buildings that once occupied the slopes can not be traced, and it is impossible to determine whether its walls were carried through continuously.
In that part of the ruin sitting on the hilltop, the walls, as far as we can tell, match the contour of the land. The layout of the buildings that used to be on the slopes can't be determined, and it’s unclear if their walls were built continuously.
The masonry exhibited in the few surviving fragments of wall is of unusually good quality, resembling somewhat that of the Fire House, Fig. 7, and other ruins of that class. The stones are of medium size, not dressed, and are rather rougher and less flat than is usual, but the wall has a good finish. The stone, however, is of poor quality. Most of the débris about the ruin consists of small stone fragments and sand, comparatively few stones of the size used in the walls being seen. The material evidently came from the immediate vicinity of the ruin.
The masonry found in the few remaining wall fragments is of surprisingly high quality, somewhat similar to that of the Fire House, Fig. 7, and other ruins of that type. The stones are medium-sized, not shaped, and are rougher and less flat than usual, but the wall has a nice finish. However, the stone quality is poor. Most of the debris around the ruin consists of small stone fragments and sand, with relatively few large stones like those used in the walls. The material clearly came from the area close to the ruin.
Pottery fragments were quite abundant about this ruin, most of the ware represented being of exceptional quality and belonging to the older types; red ware with black lines and black and white ware were especially abundant.
Pottery fragments were pretty common around this ruin, with most of the pieces being of high quality and belonging to the older styles; red pottery with black lines and black and white pottery were particularly plentiful.
56 There is quite an extensive view from the ruin, the top of the butte commanding an outlook down the valley past Oraibi, and about 5 miles north. There is also an extended outlook up the valley followed by the wagon road above referred to, and over two branch valleys, one on the east and another of much less extent on the west. The site was well adapted for defense, which must have been one of the principal motives for its selection.
56 There’s a wide view from the ruins, with the top of the butte providing a lookout down the valley past Oraibi, and about 5 miles to the north. There’s also a broad view up the valley along the wagon road mentioned earlier, and over two smaller valleys, one to the east and a much smaller one to the west. The location was very suitable for defense, which must have been one of the main reasons for choosing it.
KWAITUKI.
The ruin known to the Tusayan as Kwaituki (Fig. 6) is also on the west side of the Oraibi wash, 14 miles above Oraibi, and about 7 miles above the ruin last described. Its general resemblance to the latter is very striking. The builders have apparently been actuated by the same motives in their choice of a site, and their manner of utilizing it corresponds very closely. The crowning feature of the rocky knoll in this case is a picturesque group of rectangular masses of sandstone, somewhat irregularly distributed. The bare summit of a large block-like mass still retains the vestiges of rooms, and probably most of the groups were at one time covered with buildings, forming a prominent citadel-like group in the midst of the village. To the north of this rocky butte a large area seems to have been at one time inclosed by buildings, forming a court of unusual dimensions. Along the outer margin of the pueblo 57 occasional fragments of walls define former rooms, but the amount and character of the débris indicate that the inner area was almost completely inclosed with buildings. The remains of masonry extend on the south a little beyond the base of the central group of rocks, but here the vestiges of stonework are rather faint and scattered.
The ruin known to the Tusayan as Kwaituki (Fig. 6) is also located on the west side of the Oraibi wash, 14 miles above Oraibi, and about 7 miles above the previously mentioned ruin. Its overall resemblance to the latter is very striking. The builders seem to have been driven by the same motivations when choosing this site, and the way they used it is very similar. The standout feature of the rocky knoll here is a picturesque group of rectangular sandstone blocks, arranged somewhat irregularly. The top of a large blocky mass still shows signs of rooms, and it’s likely that most of the groups were once covered with buildings, forming a prominent citadel-like cluster in the middle of the village. To the north of this rocky butte, there appears to have been a large area enclosed by buildings, creating a court of unusually large size. Along the outer edge of the pueblo 57 occasional remnants of walls outline former rooms, but the amount and type of debris suggest that the inner area was almost entirely surrounded by buildings. The remains of the masonry extend southward slightly beyond the base of the central group of rocks, but here the signs of stonework are rather faint and scattered.
Fig. 6. Ruin 14 miles north of Oraibi (Kwaituki).
Fig. 6. Ruin 14 miles north of Oraibi (Kwaituki).
In the nearly level tops of some of the rocks forming the central pile are many smoothly worn depressions or cavities, which have evidently been used for the grinding and shaping of stone implements.
In the almost flat tops of some rocks that make up the central pile, there are many smoothly worn depressions or hollowed areas that have clearly been used for grinding and shaping stone tools.
A remarkable feature occurring within this village is a cave or underground fissure in the rocks, which evidently had been used by the inhabitants. The mouth or entrance to this cavern, partly obstructed and concealed at the time of our visit, occurs at the point A on the plan. On clearing away the rubbish at the mouth and entering it was found so obstructed with broken rock and fine dust that but little progress could be made in its exploration; but the main crevice in the rock could be seen by artificial light to extend some 10 feet back from the mouth, where it became very shallow. It could be seen that the original cavern had been improved by the pueblo-builders, as some of the timbers that had been placed inside were still in position, and a low wall of masonry on the south side remained intact. Some Navajos stated that they had discovered this small cave a couple of years before and had taken from it a large unbroken water jar of ancient pottery and some other specimens. The place was probably used by the ancient occupants simply for storage.
A notable feature in this village is a cave or underground opening in the rocks, which seems to have been used by the locals. The entrance to this cavern, which was partially blocked and hidden during our visit, is located at point A on the map. After clearing away the debris at the entrance and stepping inside, we found it so blocked with broken rock and fine dust that we could hardly explore it; however, the main crack in the rock could be seen with artificial light extending about 10 feet back from the entrance, where it got quite shallow. It was clear that the original cavern had been enhanced by the pueblo builders, as some of the timbers placed inside were still standing, and a low stone wall on the south side was still intact. Some Navajos mentioned that they had discovered this small cave a couple of years earlier and had removed a large intact water jar made of ancient pottery along with a few other items. This place was likely used by the ancient residents mainly for storage.
Fragments of pottery of excellent quality were very abundant about this ruin and at the foot of the central rocks the ground was thickly strewn with fragments, often of large size.
Fragments of high-quality pottery were everywhere around this ruin, and at the base of the central rocks, the ground was covered with shards, many of which were quite large.
The defensive character of this site parallels that of the ruin 7 miles farther south in quite a remarkable manner, and the villages were apparently built and occupied at the same time.
The defensive nature of this site is strikingly similar to that of the ruin 7 miles farther south, and the villages were seemingly constructed and inhabited during the same period.
TEBUGKIHU, OR FIRE HOUSE.
![]() |
Fig. 7.
Oval (Fire House) ruin, plan (Tebugkihu). |
About 15 miles northeast of Keam’s Canyon, and about 25 miles from Walpi, is a small ruin called by the Tusayan “Tebugkihu,” built by people of the Fire gens (now extinct). As the plan (Fig. 7) clearly shows, this pueblo is very different from the typical Tusayan villages that have been previously described. The apparent unity of the plan, and the skillful workmanship somewhat resembling the pueblos of the Chaco are in marked contrast to the irregularity and careless construction of most of the Tusayan ruins. Its distance from the center of the province, too, suggests outside relationship; but still the Tusayan traditions undoubtedly connect the place with some of the ancestral gentes, as seen in Chapter I.
About 15 miles northeast of Keam’s Canyon, and around 25 miles from Walpi, there's a small ruin called “Tebugkihu” by the Tusayan, built by the now-extinct Fire gens. As the plan (Fig. 7) clearly shows, this pueblo is quite different from the typical Tusayan villages we've seen before. The clear design of the layout and the skilled craftsmanship, which somewhat resembles the pueblos of Chaco, stand in stark contrast to the irregular and careless construction of most Tusayan ruins. Its location away from the center of the province also suggests a connection to outside communities; however, Tusayan traditions definitely link this place to some of their ancestral groups, as discussed in Chapter I.
The small and compact cluster of rooms is in a remarkable state of preservation, especially the outside wall. This wall was carefully and massively constructed, and stands to the height of several feet around 58 the entire circumference of the ruin, except along the brink of the cliff, as the plan shows.
This outer wall contains by far the largest stones yet found incorporated in pueblo masonry. A fragment of this masonry is illustrated in Pl. XI. The largest stone shown measures about 5 feet in length, and the one adjoining on the right measures about 4 feet. These dimensions are quite remarkable in pueblo masonry, which is distinguished by the use of very small stones.
This outer wall contains the biggest stones ever found in pueblo masonry. A piece of this masonry is shown in Pl. XI. The largest stone shown is about 5 feet long, and the adjacent one on the right is about 4 feet. These sizes are quite impressive in pueblo masonry, which is known for using very small stones.
Plate XI. Masonry on the outer wall of the Fire-House, detail.
Plate XI. Detail of the masonry on the outer wall of the Firehouse.
The well defined outer wall of this cluster to the unaided eye appears to be elliptical, but it will be seen from the plan that the ellipse is somewhat pointed on the side farthest from the cliff. As in other cases of ancient pueblos with curved outlines, the outer wall seems to have been built first, and the inner rooms, while kept as rectangular as possible, were adjusted to this curve. This arrangement often led to a cumulating divergence from radial lines in some of the partitions, which irregularity was taken up in one room, as in this instance, in the space near the gate. The outer wall is uniform in construction so far as preserved. Many irregularities appear, however, in the construction of the inner or partition walls, and some of the rooms show awkward attempts at adjustment to the curve of the outer wall.
The clearly defined outer wall of this cluster looks elliptical to the naked eye, but the plan shows that the ellipse is a bit pointed on the side farthest from the cliff. Like other ancient pueblos with curved shapes, it seems that the outer wall was built first, and the inner rooms, while kept as rectangular as possible, were fitted to this curve. This setup often led to a growing divergence from the radial lines in some of the partitions, which was addressed in one room, as seen here, in the area near the gate. The outer wall is consistent in construction as far as it has been preserved. However, there are many irregularities in the construction of the inner or partition walls, and some of the rooms show clumsy attempts to adjust to the curve of the outer wall.
The ruin is situated on the very brink of a small canyon, which probably contained a spring at the foot of the cliff close under the ruin site, as the vegetation there has an unusual appearance of freshness, suggesting the close proximity of water to the surface. A steep trail evidently connected the village with the bottom of the canyon. Some of the rocks of the mesa rim were marked by numerous cup-like cavities similar to those seen at Kwaituki, and used in the polishing and forming of stone implements. The type of pueblo here illustrated belonged to a people who relied largely on the architecture for defense, differing in this respect from the spirit of Tusayan architecture generally, where the inaccessible character of the site was the chief dependence.
The ruin is located right at the edge of a small canyon, which likely had a spring at the bottom of the cliff just below the ruin site, as the plants there look unusually fresh, indicating that water is close to the surface. A steep path clearly connected the village to the bottom of the canyon. Some of the rocks on the mesa rim had many cup-like depressions like those seen at Kwaituki, used for polishing and shaping stone tools. The type of pueblo shown here belonged to a people who depended heavily on their architecture for protection, which is different from the general approach of Tusayan architecture, where the site’s inaccessibility was the main defense.
CHUKUBI.
The ruin called Chukubi by the Tusayan (Pl. XII) is situated on the Middle Mesa, about 3 miles northeast of Mashongnavi. It occupies a promontory above the same broad sandstone ledge that forms such a 59 conspicuous feature in the vicinity of Mashongnavi and Shupaulovi, and which supports the buttes upon which these villages are built.
The ruin known as Chukubi by the Tusayan (Pl. XII) is located on the Middle Mesa, approximately 3 miles northeast of Mashongnavi. It sits on a high point above the same wide sandstone ledge that stands out in the area around Mashongnavi and Shupaulovi, supporting the buttes on which these villages are built.
Little masonry now remains on this site, but here and there a fragment aids in defining the general plan of the pueblo. In general form the village was a large rectangle with a line of buildings across its center, dividing it into two unequal courts, and a projecting wing on the west side. As may be seen from the illustration, one end of the ruin forms a clearly defined rectangular court, composed of buildings mostly two rooms deep. Here, as in other ruins of Tusayan, the arrangement about inclosed courts is in contrast with the parallelism of rows, so noticeable a feature in the occupied villages. At the east end of the ruin are several curious excavations. The soft sandstone has been hollowed out to a depth of about 10 inches, in prolongation of the outlines of adjoining rooms. Such excavation to obtain level floors is quite unusual among the pueblo builders; it was practiced to a very small extent, and only where it could be done with little trouble. Any serious inequality of surface was usually incorporated in the construction, as will be noticed at Walpi (Pl. XXIII). Vestiges of masonry indicating detached rooms were seen in each of the courts of the main rectangle.
Little masonry remains on this site now, but here and there, a fragment helps outline the overall layout of the pueblo. The village generally took the shape of a large rectangle with a line of buildings in the center, splitting it into two uneven sections, along with a projecting wing on the west side. As shown in the illustration, one end of the ruins forms a well-defined rectangular courtyard, made up mostly of buildings that are two rooms deep. Here, like in other ruins of Tusayan, the arrangement around enclosed courtyards contrasts with the parallel rows that are a noticeable feature in the occupied villages. At the east end of the ruins, there are several interesting excavations. The soft sandstone has been carved out to about 10 inches deep, following the outlines of adjacent rooms. Such excavation for level floors is quite rare among the pueblo builders; it was done very minimally, only where it could be easily managed. Any major surface unevenness was usually built into the structure, as can be seen at Walpi (Pl. XXIII). Remnants of masonry indicating separate rooms were found in each of the courtyards of the main rectangle.
On the slope of the hill, just above the broad ledge previously described, there is a fine spring, but no trace of a trail connecting it with the pueblo could be found.
On the slope of the hill, just above the broad ledge mentioned earlier, there is a nice spring, but there’s no sign of a trail linking it to the pueblo.
This village was advantageously placed for defense, but not to the same degree as Payupki, illustrated in Pl. XIII.
This village was well-positioned for defense, but not as much as Payupki, as shown in Pl. XIII.
Plate XIV. General view of Payupki.
Plate XIV. A general view of Payupki.
PAYUPKI.
The ruin called Payupki (Pl. XIII) occupies the summit of a bold promontory south of the trail, from Walpi to Oraibi, and about 6 miles northwest from Mashongnavi. The outer extremity of this promontory is separated from the mesa by a deep notch. The summit is reached from the mesa by way of the neck, as the outer point itself is very abrupt, much of the sandstone ledge being vertical. A bench, 12 or 15 feet below the summit and in places quite broad, encircles the promontory. This bench also breaks off very abruptly.
The ruins known as Payupki (Pl. XIII) sit at the top of a steep promontory south of the trail from Walpi to Oraibi and about 6 miles northwest of Mashongnavi. The outer edge of this promontory is separated from the mesa by a deep notch. You can reach the summit from the mesa via a narrow neck, as the outer point is very steep, with much of the sandstone ledge being vertical. There's a ledge, 12 to 15 feet below the summit and fairly wide in some spots, that goes around the promontory. This ledge also drops off quite sharply.
As may be seen from the plan, the village is quite symmetrically laid out and well arranged for defense. It is placed at the mesa end of the promontory cap, and for greater security the second ledge has also been fortified. All along the outer margin of this ledge are the remains of a stone wall, in some places still standing to a height of 1 or 2 feet. This wall appears to have extended originally all along the ledge around three sides of the village. The steepness of the cliff on the remaining side rendered a wall superfluous. On the plain below this promontory, and immediately under the overhanging cliff, are two corrals, and also 60 the remains of a structure that resembles a kiva, but which appears to be of recent construction.
As you can see from the plan, the village is laid out quite symmetrically and is well-designed for defense. It’s located at the end of the mesa on the promontory cap, and for extra protection, the second ledge has also been reinforced. Along the outer edge of this ledge are the remnants of a stone wall, still standing in some places up to 1 or 2 feet high. This wall originally ran along the ledge around three sides of the village. The steepness of the cliff on the other side made a wall unnecessary. On the plain below this promontory, right under the overhanging cliff, there are two corrals and also 60 the remains of a structure that looks like a kiva, but seems to have been built recently.
In the village proper (Pl. XIV) are two distinctly traceable kivas. One of these, situated in the court, is detached and appears to have been partly underground. The other, located in the southeast end of the village, has also, like the first, apparently been sunk slightly below the surface. There is a jog in the standing wall of this kiva which corresponds to that usually found in the typical Tusayan kivas (see Figs. 22 and 25). On the promontory and east of the village is a single room of more than average length, with a well formed door in the center of one side. This room has every appearance of being contemporary with the rest of the village, but its occurrence in this entirely isolated position is very unusual. Still farther east there is a mass of debris that may have belonged to a cluster of six or eight rooms, or it may possibly be the remains of temporary stone shelters for outlooks over crops, built at a later date than the pueblo. As may be seen from the illustration (Pl. XV), the walls are roughly built of large slabs of sandstone of various sizes. The work is rather better than that of modern Tusayan, but much inferior to that seen in the skillfully laid masonry of the ruins farther north. In many of these walls an occasional sandstone slab of great length is introduced. This peculiarity is probably due to the character of the local material, which is more varied than usual. All of the stone here used is taken from ledges in the immediate vicinity. It is usually light in color and of loose texture, crumbling readily, and subject to rapid decay, particularly when used in walls that are roughly constructed.
In the village itself (Pl. XIV), there are two clearly identifiable kivas. One of these, located in the courtyard, is separate and seems to be partially underground. The other, found at the southeast end of the village, also appears to be slightly sunken below the surface, like the first. There’s a curve in the standing wall of this kiva that aligns with what’s typically seen in standard Tusayan kivas (see Figs. 22 and 25). On the promontory, east of the village, there’s a single room that’s longer than average, with a well-formed door in the center of one wall. This room looks like it was built at the same time as the rest of the village, but it’s quite unusual for it to be in such an isolated spot. Further east, there’s a pile of rubble that might have belonged to a group of six or eight rooms, or it could be the remains of temporary stone shelters for people watching over crops, constructed later than the pueblo. As shown in the illustration (Pl. XV), the walls are roughly made from large sandstone slabs of various sizes. The craftsmanship is somewhat better than that of modern Tusayan, but much poorer than the intricately laid masonry found in ruins further north. Many of these walls include occasional long sandstone slabs. This oddity is likely due to the nature of the local materials, which are more varied than usual. All the stone used here comes from ledges nearby. It’s typically light in color, has a loose texture, crumbles easily, and decays quickly, especially when used in roughly built walls.
Plate XV. Standing walls of Payupki.
Plate XV. Standing walls of Payupki.
Much of the pottery scattered about this ruin has a very modern appearance, some of it having the characteristic surface finish and color of the Rio Grande ware. A small amount of ancient pottery also occurs here, some of the fragments of black and white ware displaying intricate fret patterns. The quantity of these potsherds is quite small, and they occur mainly in the refuse heaps on the mesa edge.
Much of the pottery found scattered around this ruin looks very modern, with some showcasing the typical surface finish and color of Rio Grande ware. There's also a small amount of ancient pottery here, with some fragments of black and white ware featuring intricate fret patterns. The amount of these potsherds is fairly limited, and they primarily appear in the trash heaps along the mesa edge.
This ruin combines a clearly defined defensive plan with utilization of one of the most inaccessible sites in the vicinity, producing altogether a combination that would seem to have been impregnable by any of the ordinary methods of Indian warfare.
This ruin has a well-thought-out defensive strategy and is built on one of the hardest-to-reach locations nearby, making it seem nearly impossible to conquer using standard Indian warfare tactics.
PLANS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE INHABITED VILLAGES.
Plate XVII. View of Hano.
Plate XVII. View of Hanoi.
HANO.
The village of Hano, or Tewa, is intrusive and does not properly belong to the Tusayan stock, as appears from their own traditions. It is somewhat loosely planned (Pl. XVI) and extends nearly across the mesa tongue, which is here quite narrow, and in general there is no appreciable difference between the arrangement here followed and that of the other villages. One portion of the village, however, designated as House No. 5 on the plan, differs somewhat from the typical arrangement in long irregular rows, and approaches the pyramidal form found among the more eastern pueblos, notably at Taos and in portions of Zuñi. As has been seen, tradition tells us that this site was taken up by the Tewa at a late date and subsequent to the Spanish conquest; but some houses, formerly belonging to the Asa people, formed a nucleus about which the Tewa village of Hano was constructed. The pyramidal house occupied by the old governor, is said to have been built over such remains of earlier houses.
The village of Hano, or Tewa, feels out of place and doesn’t really belong to the Tusayan people, as their own stories suggest. It’s somewhat loosely designed (Pl. 16) and stretches almost entirely across a narrow part of the mesa. Generally, there’s no significant difference between how this village is arranged and how the other villages are set up. However, one section of the village, labeled as House No. 5 on the plan, has a different layout that consists of long, uneven rows, resembling the pyramidal shapes seen in some of the eastern pueblos, especially in Taos and parts of Zuñi. As mentioned, tradition indicates that the Tewa established this site relatively recently after the Spanish conquest; however, some houses that once belonged to the Asa people formed a core area around which the Tewa village of Hano was built. The pyramidal house where the old governor lived is believed to have been constructed over the remnants of these earlier houses.
The largest building in the village appears to have been added to from time to time as necessity for additional space arose, resulting in much the same arrangement as that characterizing most of the Tusayan houses, viz, a long, irregular row, not more than three stories high at any point. The small range marked No. 4 on the plan contains a section three stories high, as does the long row and also the pyramidal cluster above referred to. (Pl. XVII.)
The largest building in the village seems to have been gradually expanded whenever there was a need for more space, leading to a layout similar to many of the Tusayan houses, which typically feature a long, irregular row that is no taller than three stories at any point. The small section marked No. 4 on the plan has three stories, just like the long row and the mentioned pyramidal cluster. (Pl. XVII.)
The kivas are two in number, one situated within the village and the other occupying a position in the margin of the mesa. These ceremonial chambers, so far as observed, appear to be much like those in the other villages, both in external and internal arrangement.
The kivas are two in total, with one located in the village and the other positioned along the edge of the mesa. These ceremonial chambers, based on what has been seen, seem to be very similar to those in the other villages, both in their external and internal setup.
Within the last few years the horse trail that afforded access to Hano and Sichumovi has been converted into a wagon road, and during the progress of this work, under the supervision of an American, considerable blasting was done. Among other changes the marginal kiva, which was nearly in line with the proposed improvements, was removed. This was done despite the protest of the older men, and their predictions of dire calamity sure to follow such sacrilege. A new site was selected close by and the newly acquired knowledge of the use of powder was utilized in blasting out the excavation for this subterranean chamber. It is altogether probable that the sites of all former kivas were largely determined by accident, these rooms being built at points where natural fissures or open spaces in the broken mesa edge furnished a suitable depression or cavity. The builders were not capable of working the stone to any great extent, and their operations were probably limited to trimming out such natural excavations and in part lining them with masonry.
In recent years, the horse trail that led to Hano and Sichumovi has been turned into a wagon road, and during this process, overseen by an American, a lot of blasting took place. One of the changes included the removal of the marginal kiva, which was nearly aligned with the planned improvements. This happened despite the objections from the older men, who predicted severe consequences would result from such desecration. A new location was chosen nearby, and the new knowledge of using explosives was applied to create the excavation for this underground chamber. It’s likely that the locations of all previous kivas were mostly determined by chance, with these rooms built where natural cracks or open spaces in the rocky mesa edge created a suitable dip or cavity. The builders probably weren’t able to shape the stone extensively, so their work was likely limited to refining those natural excavations and partially lining them with masonry.
There is a very noticeable scarcity of roof-holes, aside from those of the first terrace. As a rule the first terrace has no external openings 62 on the ground and is entered from its roof through large trap-doors, as shown on the plans. The lower rooms within this first terrace are not inhabited, but are used as storerooms.
There are very few roof openings, except for those on the first terrace. Usually, the first terrace doesn’t have any external openings on the ground and is accessed from its roof through large trap doors, as illustrated in the plans. The lower rooms within this first terrace aren’t lived in; instead, they are used for storage. 62
At several points ruined walls are seen, remains of abandoned rooms that have fallen into decay. Occasionally a rough, buttress-like projection from a wall is the only vestige of a room or a cluster of rooms, all traces on the ground having been obliterated.
At several places, you can see crumbling walls, the remnants of empty rooms that have fallen into disrepair. Sometimes, a rough, buttress-like projection from a wall is the only sign of a room or a group of rooms, with all other traces on the ground completely erased.
The mesa summit, that forms the site of this village, is nearly level, with very little earth on its surface. A thin accumulation of soil and rubbish lightly covers the inner court, but outside, along the face of the long row, the bare rock is exposed continuously. Where the rooms have been abandoned and the walls have fallen, the stones have all been utilized in later constructions, leaving no vestige of the former wall on the rocky site, as the stones of the masonry have always been set upon the surface of the rock, with no excavation or preparation of footings of any kind.
The summit of the mesa, where this village is located, is almost flat, with very little dirt on top. A thin layer of soil and debris lightly covers the inner courtyard, but outside, along the long edge, the bare rock is constantly exposed. Where the rooms have been abandoned and the walls have collapsed, all the stones have been used in later constructions, leaving no trace of the old wall on the rocky site, as the stones of the masonry have always been placed directly on the surface of the rock, with no digging or preparation of any kind for the foundations.
Plate XIX. View of Sichumovi.
Plate XIX. View of Sichumovi.
SICHUMOVI.
According to traditional accounts this village was founded at a more recent date than Walpi. It has, however, undergone many changes since its first establishment.
According to traditional accounts, this village was founded later than Walpi. However, it has gone through many changes since its original establishment.
The principal building is a long irregular row, similar to that of Hano (Pl. XVIII). A portion of an L-shaped cluster west of this row, and a small row near it parallel to the main building, form a rude approximation to the inclosed court arrangement. The terracing here, however, is not always on the court side, whereas in ancient examples such arrangement was an essential defensive feature, as the court furnished the only approach to upper terraces. In all of these villages there is a noticeable tendency to face the rows eastward instead of toward the court. The motive of such uniformity of direction in the houses must have been strong, to counteract the tendency to adhere to the ancient arrangement. The two kivas of the village are built side by side, in contact, probably on account of the presence at this point of a favorable fissure or depression in the mesa surface.
The main building is a long, irregular line, similar to that of Hano (Pl. 18). Part of an L-shaped cluster to the west of this line, along with a small row nearby parallel to the main building, creates a rough approximation of the enclosed courtyard layout. However, the terracing here isn’t always on the courtyard side, while in ancient examples, this setup was a crucial defensive feature since the courtyard provided the only access to the upper terraces. In all of these villages, there’s a clear trend to face the rows east instead of toward the courtyard. The motivation for this consistent direction in the houses must have been significant to overcome the pull of the traditional layout. The two kivas in the village are built right next to each other, likely due to the presence of a favorable fissure or dip in the mesa surface at this spot.
On the south side of the village are the remains of two small clusters of rooms that apparently have been abandoned a long time. A portion of a room still bounded by standing walls has been utilized as a corral for burros (Pl. XIX).
On the south side of the village, there are the remains of two small groups of rooms that have clearly been abandoned for a long time. Part of a room, still enclosed by standing walls, has been used as a pen for donkeys (Pl. XIX).
At this village are three small detached houses, each composed of but a single room, a feature not at all in keeping with the spirit of pueblo construction. In this instance it is probably due to the selection of the village as the residence of whites connected with the agency or school. Of these single-room houses, one, near the south end of the long row, was being built by an American, who was living in another such house near the middle of this row. The third house, although fairly well preserved at the time of the survey, was abandoned and falling into ruin. Adjoining the middle one of these three buildings on 63 the south side are the outlines of two small compartments, which were evidently built as corrals for burros and are still used for that purpose.
At this village, there are three small detached houses, each consisting of just one room, which doesn't really fit the traditional pueblo style. This choice might be because the village was designated for the use of white residents associated with the agency or school. One of these single-room houses, located near the south end of the long row, was being built by an American who lived in another similar house in the middle of the row. The third house, though it was in reasonably good shape at the time of the survey, was abandoned and deteriorating. Next to the middle house, on the south side, are the remains of two small enclosures that were clearly made as corrals for burros and are still being used for that purpose.
This village, though limited to two stories in height, has, like the others of the first mesa, a number of roof holes or trapdoors in the upper story, an approach to the Zuñi practice. This feature among the Tusayan villages is probably due to intercourse with the more eastern pueblos, for it seems to occur chiefly among those having such communication most frequently. Its presence is probably the result simply of borrowing a convenient feature from those who invented it to meet a necessity. The conditions under which the houses were built have hardly been such as to stimulate the Tusayan to the invention of such a device. The uniform height of the second-story roofs seen in this village, constituting an almost unbroken level, is a rather exceptional feature in pueblo architecture. Only one depression occurs in the whole length of the main row.
This village, while only two stories high, has several roof holes or trapdoors in the upper story, similar to those found in the Zuñi practice. This feature among the Tusayan villages likely comes from contact with the pueblos to the east, as it appears mainly in places that have frequent communication with them. Its presence is probably just borrowing a practical solution from those who created it to fulfill a need. The way the houses were built probably didn’t encourage the Tusayan to invent such a device. The consistent height of the second-story roofs in this village, creating an almost flat level, is quite an unusual aspect of pueblo architecture. Only one dip is found along the entire length of the main row.
Plate XXI. View of Walpi.
Plate 21. View of Walpi.
WALPI.
Of all the pueblos, occupied or in ruins, within the provinces of Tusayan and Cibola, Walpi exhibits the widest departure from the typical pueblo arrangement (Pl. XX).
Of all the pueblos, whether inhabited or in ruins, in the provinces of Tusayan and Cibola, Walpi shows the greatest deviation from the usual pueblo layout (Pl. XX).
The carelessness characteristic of Tusayan architecture seems to have reached its culmination here. The confused arrangement of the rooms, mainly due to the irregularities of the site, contrasts with the work at some of the other villages, and bears no comparison with much of the ancient work. The rooms seem to have been clustered together with very little regard to symmetry, and right angles are very unusual. (See Fig. 8.)
The carelessness typical of Tusayan architecture appears to have peaked here. The chaotic layout of the rooms, largely because of the site’s irregularities, stands in stark contrast to the work seen in some of the other villages and is nowhere near comparable to much of the ancient work. The rooms look like they've been grouped together without much consideration for symmetry, and right angles are quite rare. (See Fig. 8.)
![]() |
![]() |
full size Plate XX. Map of Walpi. |
Fig. 8.
Topography of the site of Walpi. |
The general plan of the village of to-day confirms the traditional accounts of its foundation. According to these its growth was gradual, beginning with a few small clusters, which were added to from time to time as the inhabitants of the lower site upon the spur of the mesa, where the mission was established, moved up and joined the pioneers on the summit. It is probable that some small rooms or clusters were built on this conspicuous promontory soon after the first occupation of this region, on account of its exceptionally favorable position as an outlook over the fields (Pl. XXI).
The layout of today's village supports the traditional stories about its origins. These stories suggest that its development was slow and steady, starting with a few small groups that expanded over time as people from the lower part of the mesa, where the mission was set up, moved up to join the early settlers at the top. It's likely that small homes or groups were built on this prominent ridge soon after the first people occupied the area, due to its excellent location for surveying the fields (Pl. XXI).
Though the peculiar conformation of the site on which the village has been built has produced an unusual irregularity of arrangement, yet even here an imperfect example of the typical inclosed court may be found, at one point containing the principal kiva or ceremonial chamber of the village. It is probable that the accidental occurrence of a suitable break or depression in the mesa top determined the position of this kiva at an early date and that the first buildings clustered about this point.
Though the unique shape of the land where the village is located has created an unusual arrangement, you can still find an imperfect example of a typical enclosed court, which at one point includes the main kiva or ceremonial chamber of the village. It's likely that the chance presence of a suitable dip or depression in the mesa top influenced the placement of this kiva early on, and that the first buildings gathered around this spot.
A unique feature in this kiva is its connection with a second subterranean chamber, reached from the kiva through an ordinary doorway. The depression used for the kiva site must have been either larger than was needed or of such form that it could not be thrown into one rectangular 64 chamber. It was impossible to ascertain the form of this second room, as the writer was not permitted to approach the connecting doorway, which was closed with a slab of cottonwood. This chamber, used as a receptacle for religious paraphernalia, was said to connect with an upper room within the cluster of dwellings close by, but this could not be verified at the time of our visit. The plan indicates that such an adjoining chamber, if of average size, could easily extend partly under the dwellings on either the west or south side of the court. The rocky mesa summit is quite irregular in this vicinity, with rather an abrupt ascent to the passageway on the south as shown in Pl. XXII. Southeast from the kiva there is a large mass of rocks projecting above the general level, which has been incorporated into a cluster of dwelling rooms. Its character and relation to the architecture may be seen in Pl. XXIII. So irregular a site was not likely to be built upon until most of the available level surface had been taken up, for even in masonry of much higher development than can be found in Tusayan the builders, unable to overcome such obstacles as a large mass of protruding rock, have accommodated their buildings to such irregularities. This is very noticeable in the center cluster of Mummy Cave (in Canyon del Muerto, Arizona), where a large mass of sandstone, fallen from the roof of the rocky niche in which the houses were built, has been incorporated into the house cluster. Between this and another kiva to the north the mesa top is nearly level. The latter kiva is 65 also subterranean and was built in an accidental break in sandstone. On the very margin of this fissure stands a curious isolated rock that has survived the general erosion of the mesa. It is near this rock that the celebrated Snake-dance takes place, although the kiva from which the dancers emerge to perform the open air ceremony is not adjacent to this monument (Pl. XXIV).
A unique feature of this kiva is its connection to a second underground chamber, accessed from the kiva through a regular doorway. The depression used for the kiva site must have been either larger than necessary or shaped in a way that it couldn’t be formed into just one rectangular chamber. It was impossible to determine the shape of this second room since the writer was not allowed to get close to the connecting doorway, which was blocked by a slab of cottonwood. This chamber, which served as a storage area for religious items, was said to connect with an upper room within the nearby cluster of dwellings, but this couldn’t be confirmed during our visit. The layout suggests that such an adjoining chamber, if it were of average size, could easily extend partially under the dwellings on either the west or south side of the courtyard. The rocky mesa summit is quite uneven in this area, with a steep rise to the passageway on the south as shown in Pl. XXII. To the southeast of the kiva, there is a large rock formation that rises above the surrounding level, which has been incorporated into a group of living spaces. Its characteristics and relation to the architecture can be seen in Pl. XXIII. A site this uneven was unlikely to be built upon until most of the available flat surface had been used up, as even in masonry much more advanced than what can be found in Tusayan, builders have adjusted their structures to accommodate large protruding rocks. This is particularly evident in the central cluster of Mummy Cave (in Canyon del Muerto, Arizona), where a large sandstone mass that fell from the roof of the rocky niche where the houses were built has been integrated into the group of houses. Between this and another kiva to the north, the mesa top is nearly level. The latter kiva is also underground and was constructed in an accidental break in the sandstone. On the very edge of this fissure stands a curious isolated rock that has remained intact despite the general erosion of the mesa. It is near this rock that the famous Snake Dance occurs, although the kiva from which the dancers emerge to perform the outdoor ceremony is not next to this monument (Pl. XXIV).
Plate XXII. South passageway of Walpi.
Plate XXII. South passageway of Walpi.
A short distance farther toward the north occur a group of three more kivas. These are on the very brink of the mesa, and have been built in recesses in the crowning ledge of sandstone of such size that they could conveniently be walled up on the outside, the outer surface of rude walls being continuous with the precipitous rock face of the mesa.
A short distance further north, there’s a group of three more kivas. These are right on the edge of the mesa, built into recesses in the sandy ledge of sandstone that are big enough to be easily walled off on the outside, with the rough walls blending seamlessly into the steep rock face of the mesa.
Plate XXIII. Houses built over irregular sites, Walpi.
Plate XXIII. Houses built on uneven land, Walpi.
The positions of all these ceremonial chambers seem to correspond with exceptionally rough and broken portions of the mesa top, showing that their location in relation to the dwelling clusters was due largely to accident and does not possess the significance that position does in many ancient pueblos built on level and unencumbered sites, where the adjustment was not controlled by the character of the surface.
The locations of all these ceremonial rooms appear to align with especially rugged and uneven areas of the mesa top, indicating that their placement in relation to the living clusters was mostly random and doesn’t hold the same importance that positioning does in many ancient pueblos constructed on flat and unobstructed sites, where the layout wasn’t influenced by the nature of the ground.
Plate XXIV. Dance rock and kiva, Walpi.
Plate XXIV. Dance rock and kiva, Walpi.
The Walpi promontory is so abrupt and difficult of access that there is no trail by which horses can be brought to the village without passing through Hano and Sichumovi, traversing the whole length of the mesa tongue, and crossing a rough break or depression in the mesa summit close to the village. Several foot trails give access to the village, partly over the nearly perpendicular faces of rock. All of these have required to be artificially improved in order to render them practicable. Plate XXV, from a photograph, illustrates one of these trails, which, a portion of the way, leads up between a huge detached slab of sandstone and the face of the mesa. It will be seen that the trail at this point consists to a large extent of stone steps that have been built in. At the top of the flight of steps where the trail to the mesa summit turns to the right the solid sandstone has been pecked out so as to furnish a series of footholes, or steps, with no projection or hold of any kind alongside. There are several trails on the west side of the mesa leading down both from Walpi and Sichúmovi to a spring below, which are quite as abrupt as the example illustrated. All the water used in these villages, except such as is caught during showers in the basin-like water pockets of the mesa top, is laboriously brought up these trails in large earthenware canteens slung over the backs of the women.
The Walpi promontory is so steep and hard to get to that there’s no trail where horses can reach the village without going through Hano and Sichumovi, traveling the entire length of the mesa, and crossing a rough dip or depression at the mesa's top near the village. There are several footpaths that lead to the village, partly over nearly vertical rock faces. All of these pathways had to be artificially improved to make them usable. Plate XXV, from a photograph, shows one of these paths, which, for part of the way, goes up between a huge detached slab of sandstone and the mesa’s face. You can see that the trail at this point consists largely of stone steps that have been built in. At the top of the flight of steps, where the trail to the mesa summit turns right, the solid sandstone has been chipped away to create a series of footholes or steps, with no ledges or holds on the side. There are several trails on the west side of the mesa that lead down from both Walpi and Sichúmovi to a spring below, and they are just as steep as the one shown. All the water used in these villages, except for what’s collected during rain in the basin-like water pockets at the top of the mesa, is painstakingly carried up these trails in large earthenware canteens slung over the backs of the women.
![]() |
Plate XXV. Foot trail to Walpi. |
Supplies of every kind, provisions, harvested crops, fuel, etc., are brought up these steep trails, and often from a distance of several miles, yet these conservative people tenaciously cling to the inconvenient situation selected by their fathers long after the necessity for so doing has passed away. At present no argument of convenience or comfort seems sufficient to induce them to abandon their homes on the rocky heights and build near the water supply and the fields on which they depend for subsistence.
Supplies of all kinds—food, harvested crops, fuel, and more—are brought up these steep trails, often from several miles away. Yet these traditional people stubbornly hold on to the challenging spot chosen by their ancestors long after the need to do so has faded. Right now, no argument about convenience or comfort seems enough to persuade them to leave their homes on the rocky heights and move closer to the water supply and the fields they rely on for survival.
66 One of the trails referred to in the description of Hano has been converted into a wagon road, as has been already described. The Indians preferred to expend the enormous amount of labor necessary to convert this bridle path into a wagon road in order slightly to overcome the inconvenience of transporting every necessary to the mesa upon their own backs or by the assistance of burros. This concession to modern ideas is at best but a poor substitute for the convenience of homes built in the lower valleys.
66 One of the trails mentioned in the description of Hano has been turned into a wagon road, as previously noted. The Native Americans chose to put in the considerable effort needed to upgrade this bridle path into a wagon road to make it a bit easier to transport everything to the mesa, either by carrying it on their backs or with the help of donkeys. This adaptation to modern ways is, at best, a poor replacement for the comfort of homes located in the lower valleys.
Plate XXVII. Mashongnavi with Shupaulovi in distance.
Plate XXVII. Mashongnavi with Shupaulovi in the background.
MASHONGNAVI.
Mashongnavi, situated on the summit of a rocky knoll, is a compact though irregular village, and the manner in which it conforms to the general outline of the available ground is shown on the plan. Convenience of access to the fields on the east and to the other villages probably prompted the first occupation of the east end of this rocky butte (Pl. XXVI).
Mashongnavi, perched on top of a rocky hill, is a small but uneven village, and the way it fits with the overall shape of the land is illustrated on the map. Easy access to the fields to the east and to the other villages likely led to the initial settlement of the eastern part of this rocky ridge (Pl. XXVI).
In Mashongnavi of to-day the eastern portion of the village forms a
more decided court than do the other portions. The completeness in
itself of this eastern end of the pueblo, in connection with the form of
the adjoining rows, strongly suggests that this was the first portion of
the pueblo built, although examination of the masonry and construction
furnish but imperfect data as to the relative age of different portions
of the village. One uniform gray tint, with only slight local variations
in character and finish of masonry, imparts a monotonous effect of
antiquity to the whole mass of dwellings. Here and there, at rare
intervals, is seen a wall that has been newly plastered; but,
ordinarily, masonry of 10 years’ age looks nearly as old as that built
200 years earlier. Another feature that suggests the greater antiquity
of the eastern court of the pueblo is the presence and manner of
occurrence here of the kiva. The old builders may have been influenced
to some extent in their choice of site by the presence of a favorable
depression for the construction of a kiva, though this particular
example of the ceremonial room is only partly subterranean. The other
kivas are almost or quite below the ground level. Although a favorable
depression might readily occur on the summit of the knoll, a deep
cavity, suitable for the construction of the subterranean kiva, would
not be likely to occur at such a distance from the margin of the
sandstone ledge. The builders evidently preferred to adopt such half-way
measures with their first kiva in order to
67
secure its inclosure within the court, thus conforming to the typical
pueblo arrangement. The numerous exceptions to this arrangement seen in
Tusayan are due to local causes.
Fig. 9.
Mashongnavi and Shupaulovi from Shumopavi.
The general view of Mashongnavi given in Pl.
XXVII shows that the site of this
pueblo, as well as that of its neighbor, Shupaulovi, was not
particularly defensible, and that this fact would have weight in
securing adherence in the first portion
68
of the pueblo built to the defensive inclosed court containing the
ceremonial chamber. The plan strongly indicates that the other courts of
the pueblo were added as the village grew, each added row facing toward
the back of an older row, producing a series of courts, which, to the
present time, show more terracing on their western sides. The eastern
side of each court is formed, apparently, by a few additions
69
of low rooms to what was originally an unbroken exterior wall, and which
is still clearly traceable through these added rooms. Such an exterior
wall is illustrated in Pl. XVIII. This process continued until the last
cluster nearly filled the available site and a wing was thrown out
corresponding to a tongue or spur of the knoll upon which it was built.
Naturally the westernmost or newer portions show more clearly
70
the evidence of additions and changes, but such evidence is not wholly
wanting in the older portions. The large row that bounds the original
eastern court on the west side may be seen on the plan to be of unusual
width, having the largest number of rooms that form a terrace with
western aspect; yet the nearly straight line once defining the original
back wall of the court inclosing cluster on this side has not been
obscured to any great extent by the later additions (Pl. XXVIII). This
village furnishes the most striking example in the whole group of the
manner in which a pueblo was gradually enlarged as increasing population
demanded more space. Such additions were often carried out on a definite
plan, although the results in Tusayan fall far short of the symmetry
that characterizes many ruined pueblos in New Mexico and Arizona.
In today's Mashongnavi, the eastern part of the village is a more defined courtyard than the other areas. The completeness of this eastern end of the pueblo, along with the layout of the surrounding rows, suggests it was the first part of the pueblo constructed, even though looking at the masonry and structure provides limited information about the relative age of different village sections. The uniform gray color, with only slight variations in the character and finish of the masonry, gives a monotonous sense of age to all the dwellings. Occasionally, you can see a wall that has been newly plastered, but typically, masonry that is 10 years old looks almost as ancient as that which was built 200 years prior. Another aspect indicating the greater age of the eastern courtyard of the pueblo is the way the kiva is situated here. The original builders might have been somewhat guided by the presence of a suitable dip for constructing a kiva, although this particular ceremonial room is only partially underground. The other kivas are mostly or entirely below ground level. While a suitable dip could easily exist on the hilltop, a deep hollow for a subterranean kiva wouldn't likely be found far from the edge of the sandstone ledge. The builders clearly chose to adopt a partial approach with their first kiva to keep it enclosed within the courtyard, aligning with the typical pueblo layout. The many exceptions to this layout seen in Tusayan are due to local factors. The overall view of Mashongnavi provided in Pl. XXVII shows that the location of this pueblo, as well as that of its neighbor, Shupaulovi, was not particularly defensible, which would have played a role in securing the initial portion of the pueblo built around the enclosed courtyard with the ceremonial chamber. The layout strongly suggests that the other courtyards of the pueblo were added as the village expanded, each new row facing the back of an older one, creating a series of courtyards that still display more terracing on their western sides today. The eastern side of each courtyard appears to have been formed by a few added low rooms to what was originally an uninterrupted exterior wall, which remains distinctly traceable through these added rooms. An exterior wall like this is shown in Pl. 18. This process went on until the last cluster nearly occupied the entire site, with a wing extending out corresponding to a spur of the knoll where it was built. Naturally, the westernmost or newer sections show evidence of additions and changes more clearly, though signs of these are also present in the older parts. The large row that borders the original eastern courtyard on its west side is unusually wide on the plan, containing the most rooms that form a terrace facing west; still, the almost straight line that once marked the original back wall of the courtyard enclosing this cluster has not been greatly obscured by later additions (Pl. XXVIII). This village provides the most striking example in the entire group of how a pueblo was gradually expanded as the growing population required more space. Such additions were often made according to a specific plan, though the outcomes in Tusayan are far less symmetrical than many ruined pueblos in New Mexico and Arizona.
Plate XXVIII. Back wall of a Mashongnavi house-row.
Plate XXVIII. Back wall of a Mashongnavi house row.
A few of these ancient examples, especially some of the smaller ruins of the Chaco group, are so symmetrical in their arrangement that they seem to be the result of a single effort to carry out a clearly fixed plan. By far the largest number of pueblos, however, built among the southwest tablelands, if occupied for any length of time, must have been subject to irregular enlargement. In some ancient examples, such additions to the first plan undoubtedly took place without marring the general symmetry. This was the case at Pueblo Bonito, on the Chaco, where the symmetrical and even curve of the exterior defensive wall, which was at least four stories high, remained unbroken, while the large inclosed court was encroached upon by wings added to the inner terraces. These additions comfortably provided for a very large increase of population after the first building of the pueblo, without changing its exterior appearance.
A few of these ancient examples, especially some of the smaller ruins from the Chaco group, are so well-organized that they look like they stem from a single effort to follow a clearly defined plan. However, the majority of pueblos built in the southwest tablelands, if occupied for any amount of time, must have undergone irregular expansions. In some ancient cases, such additions to the original design clearly happened without disrupting the overall symmetry. This was true at Pueblo Bonito in the Chaco, where the smooth and even curve of the exterior defensive wall, which was at least four stories high, stayed intact, even as large wings were added to the inner terraces, encroaching on the spacious court. These additions comfortably accommodated a significant population increase after the pueblo was first built, without altering its outward appearance.
In order to make clearer this order of growth in Mashongnavi, a series of skeleton diagrams is added in Figs. 10, 11, and 12, giving the outlines of the pueblo at various supposed periods in the course of its enlargement. The larger plan of the village (Pl. XXVI) serves as a key to these terrace outlines.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
full size | full size | full size |
Figs. 10, 11, 12. Diagrams showing growth of Mashongnavi. |
The first diagram illustrates the supposed original cluster of the east court (Fig. 10), the lines of which can be traced on the larger plan, and it includes the long, nearly straight line that marks the western edge of the third story. This diagram shows also, in dotted lines, the general plan that may have guided the first additions to the west. The second diagram (Fig. 11) renders all the above material in full tint, again indicating further additions by dotted lines, and so on. (Fig. 12.) The portions of a terrace, which face westward in the newer courts of the pueblo, illustrated in Pl. XXIX, were probably built after the western row, completing the inclosure, and were far enough advanced to indicate definitely an inclosed court, upon which the dwelling rooms faced.
The first diagram shows the supposed original cluster of the east court (Fig. 10), with lines that can be seen on the larger plan, including the long, nearly straight line marking the western edge of the third story. This diagram also displays, in dotted lines, the general plan that might have been used for the first additions to the west. The second diagram (Fig. 11) presents all the previous material in full color, again using dotted lines to indicate additional later modifications, and so on. (Fig. 12.) The sections of a terrace that face west in the newer courts of the pueblo, shown in Pl. XXIX, were likely constructed after the western row was built, completing the enclosure, and were sufficiently developed to clearly indicate an enclosed court that the dwelling rooms overlooked.
Plate XXIX. West side of a principal row in Mashongnavi.
Plate XXIX. West side of a main street in Mashongnavi.
Plate XXXI. View of Shupaulovi.
Plate XXXI. View of Shupaulovi.
SHUPAULOVI.
This village, by far the smallest pueblo of the Tusayan group, illustrates a simple and direct use of the principle of the inclosed court. The plan (Pl. XXX) shows that the outer walls are scarcely broken by terraces, and nearly all the dwelling apartments open inwards upon the inclosure, in this respect closely following the previously described ancient type, although widely differing from it in the irregular disposition of the rooms. (Pl. XXXI) A comparison with the first of the series of diagrams illustrating the growth of Mashóngnavi, will show how similar the villages may have been at one stage, and how suitable a nucleus for a large pueblo this village would prove did space and character of the site permit. Most of the available summit of the rocky knoll has already been covered, as will be seen from the topographic sketch of the site (Fig. 13). The plan shows also that some efforts at extension of the pueblo have been made, but the houses outside of the main cluster have been abandoned, and are rapidly going to ruin. Several small rooms occur on the outer faces of the rows, but it can be readily seen that they do not form a part of the original plan but were added to an already complete structure.
This village, the smallest one in the Tusayan group, demonstrates a straightforward approach to the concept of an enclosed courtyard. The plan (Pl. XXX) shows that the outer walls are barely interrupted by terraces, and almost all the living spaces face inward towards the courtyard. This closely follows the ancient design previously described, although it differs significantly in the irregular arrangement of the rooms. (Pl. XXXI) Comparing it with the first diagram showing the development of Mashóngnavi reveals how similar the villages might have been at one point and how this village could serve as a core for a larger pueblo if the space and location allowed for it. Most of the available area on the rocky hilltop has already been developed, as seen in the topographic sketch of the site (Fig. 13). The plan also indicates that attempts to expand the pueblo have been made, but the houses outside the main cluster have been abandoned and are quickly falling into disrepair. There are several small rooms on the outer walls of the rows, but it is clear they were not part of the original design; instead, they were added to an already complete structure.
Fig. 13. Topography of the site of Shupaulovi.
Fig. 13. Topography of the Shupaulovi site.
In the inclosed court of this pueblo occurs a small box-like stone inclosure, covered with a large slab, which is used as a sort of shrine or depository for the sacred plume sticks and other ceremonial offerings. 72 This feature is found at some of the other villages, notably at Mashongnavi, in the central court, and at Hano, where it is located at some distance outside of the village, near the main trail to the mesa.
In the enclosed courtyard of this pueblo, there is a small stone structure shaped like a box, topped with a large slab. It serves as a shrine or storage place for sacred feather sticks and other ceremonial offerings. 72 You can find this feature in some other villages as well, especially at Mashongnavi, in the central courtyard, and at Hano, where it’s situated some distance outside the village, near the main path to the mesa.
The plan of this small village shows three covered passageways similar to those noted in Walpi on the first mesa, though their presence here can not be ascribed to the same motives that impelled the Walpi to build in this way; for the densely crowded site occupied by the latter compelled them to resort to this expedient. One of these is illustrated in Pl. XXXII. Its presence may be due in this instance to a determination to adhere to the protected court while seeking to secure convenient means of access to the inclosed area. It is remarkable that this, the smallest of the group, should contain this feature.
The layout of this small village features three covered walkways similar to those found in Walpi on the first mesa, but their presence here isn't driven by the same reasons that led the Walpi to build them this way; the crowded space occupied by the Walpi forced them to take this approach. One of these walkways is shown in Pl. XXXII. Its presence here might be due to a desire to stick with the protected courtyard while also ensuring easy access to the enclosed area. It's interesting that this, the smallest of the group, has this feature.
Plate XXXII. A covered passageway of Shupaulovi.
Plate XXXII. A covered walkway of Shupaulovi.
This village has but two kivas, one of which is on the rocky summit near the houses and the other on the lower ground near the foot of the trail that leads to the village. The upper kiva is nearly subterranean, the roof being but a little above the ground on the side toward the village, but as the rocky site slopes away a portion of side wall is exposed. This was roughly built, with no attempt to impart finish to its outer face, either by careful laying of the masonry or by plastering. Pl. XXXIII illustrates this kiva in connection with the southeastern portion of the village. The plan shows how the prolongation of the side rows of the village forms a suggestion of a second court. Its development into any such feature as the secondary or additional courts of Mashóngnavi was prohibited by the restricted site.
This village has only two kivas, one located on the rocky summit near the houses and the other on the lower ground at the foot of the trail leading to the village. The upper kiva is almost underground, with the roof sitting just above the ground on the side facing the village, while part of the wall is exposed due to the sloping rocky site. It was built roughly, without any effort to smooth out its outer surface, either through careful masonry work or plastering. Pl. XXXIII illustrates this kiva in relation to the southeastern part of the village. The plan shows how the extension of the side rows of the village creates the idea of a second courtyard. Its evolution into a feature like the secondary or additional courts of Mashóngnavi was restricted by the limited space.
Plate XXXIII. The chief kiva of Shupaulovi.
Plate XXXIII. The main kiva of Shupaulovi.
As in other villages of this group, the desire to adhere to the subterranean form of ceremonial chamber outweighed the inducement to place it within the village, or, in the case of the second kiva, even of placing it on the same level as the houses, which are 30 feet above it with an abrupt trail between them. It is curious and instructive to see a room, the use of which is so intimately connected with the inner life of the village, placed in such a comparatively remote and inaccessible position through an intensely conservative adherence to ancient practice requiring this chamber to be depressed.
As in other villages of this group, the preference for a subterranean ceremonial chamber was stronger than the motivation to keep it within the village. In the case of the second kiva, there was even reluctance to position it at the same level as the houses, which are 30 feet above it, connected by a steep path. It's interesting and enlightening to see a room that is so closely linked to the village's inner life situated in such a relatively isolated and hard-to-reach spot, a result of a strong commitment to traditional practices that demand the chamber be below ground.
The general view of the village given in Pl. XXXI strikingly illustrates the blending of the rectangular forms of the architecture with the angular and sharply defined fractures of the surrounding rock. This close correspondence in form between the architecture and its immediate surroundings is greatly heightened by the similarity in color. Mr. Stephen has called attention to a similar effect on the western side of Walpi and its adjacent mesa edge, which he thought indicates a distinct effort at concealment on the part of the builders, by blending the architecture with the surroundings. This similarity of effect is often accidental, and due to the fact that the materials of the houses and of the mesas on which they are built are identical. Even in the case of Walpi, cited by Mr. Stephen, where the buildings come to the very mesa edge, and in their vertical lines appear to carry out the effect of 73 the vertical fissures in the upper benches of sandstone, there was no intentional concealment. It is more likely that, through the necessity of building close to the limits of the crowded sites, a certain degree of correspondence was unintentionally produced between the jogs and angles of the houses and those of the mesa edge.
The overall view of the village shown in Pl. XXXI clearly demonstrates how the rectangular shapes of the buildings blend with the sharp, angular cracks in the surrounding rock. This close relationship in form between the architecture and its environment is further emphasized by their color similarity. Mr. Stephen pointed out a similar effect on the western side of Walpi and its nearby mesa edge, suggesting that the builders deliberately tried to conceal their structures by making them blend with the surroundings. This similarity often happens by chance, due to the fact that the materials used for the houses and the mesas they rest on are the same. Even in the case of Walpi, mentioned by Mr. Stephen, where the buildings sit right at the mesa edge and their vertical lines seem to mirror the vertical cracks in the upper sandstone benches, there was no intentional effort to hide them. It's more likely that the need to build close to the edge of the crowded sites unintentionally created a certain degree of resemblance between the bumps and angles of the houses and those of the mesa edge.
Such correspondence with the surroundings, which forms a striking feature of many primitive types of construction where intention of concealment had no part, is doubtless mainly due to the use of the most available material, although the expression of a type of construction that has prevailed for ages in one locality would perhaps be somewhat influenced by constantly recurring forms in its environment. In the system of building under consideration, such influence would, however, be a very minute fraction in the sum of factors producing the type and could never account for such examples of special and detailed correspondence as the cases cited, nor could it have any weight in developing a rectangular type of architecture.
Such connection with the surroundings, which is a noticeable characteristic of many basic construction styles where there was no intention to hide, is likely mainly due to using the most readily available materials. However, the way a particular construction style has existed for a long time in one area might be partly shaped by constantly repeating forms in its surroundings. In the building system being discussed, this influence would be very minimal in the overall factors that create the style and could never explain the specific and detailed connections seen in the examples cited, nor could it have any significant impact on creating a rectangular architecture style.
In the development of primitive arts the advances are slow and laborious, and are produced by adding small increments to current knowledge. So vague and undefined an influence as that exerted by the larger forms of surrounding nature are seldom recognized and acknowledged by the artisan; on the contrary, experiments, resulting in improvement, are largely prompted by practical requirements. Particularly is this the case in the art of house-building.
In the development of early arts, progress is slow and tough, with small additions made to existing knowledge. The vague and unclear influence of the larger natural surroundings is rarely noticed and acknowledged by the artisan; instead, experiments that lead to improvements are mostly driven by practical needs. This is especially true in the art of building houses.
Plate XXXV. View of Shumopavi.
Plate XXXV. View of Shumopavi.
SHUMOPAVI.
This village, although not so isolated as Oraibi, has no near neighbors and is little visited by whites or Indians. The inhabitants are rarely seen at the trading post to which the others resort, and they seem to be pretty well off and independent as compared with their neighbors of the other villages (Pl. XXXIV). The houses and courts are in keeping with the general character of the people and exhibit a degree of neatness and thrift that contrasts sharply with the tumble-down appearance of some of the other villages, especially those of the Middle Mesa and Oraibi. There is a general air of newness about the place, though it is questionable whether the architecture is more recent than that of the other villages of Tusayan. This effect is partly due to the custom of frequently renewing the coating of mud plaster. In most of the villages little care is taken to repair the houses until the owner feels that to postpone such action longer would endanger its stability. Many of the illustrations in this chapter indicate the proportion of rough masonry usually exposed in the walls. At Shumopavi (Pl. XXXV), however, most of the walls are smoothly plastered. In this respect they resemble Zuñi and the eastern pueblos, where but little naked masonry can be seen. Another feature that adds to the effect of neatness and finish in this village is the frequent use of a whitewash of 74 gypsum on the outer face of the walls. This wash is used partly as an ornament and partly as protection against the rain. The material, called by the Mexicans “yeso,” is very commonly used in the interior of their houses throughout this region, both by Mexicans and Indians. More rarely it is used among the pueblos as an external wash. Here, however, its external use forms quite a distinctive feature of the village. The same custom in several of the cliff houses of Canyon de Chelly attests the comparative antiquity of the practice, though not necessarily its pre-Columbian origin.
This village, while not as remote as Oraibi, doesn't have any nearby neighbors and doesn't see many visitors, whether white or Native American. The residents are seldom spotted at the trading post where others go, and they seem to be fairly well-off and self-sufficient compared to their neighbors in other villages (Pl. XXXIV). The houses and yards reflect the community's character and show a level of cleanliness and resourcefulness that stands out against the rundown look of some nearby villages, especially those on Middle Mesa and Oraibi. There’s a general sense of freshness about the place, although it’s unclear if the buildings are newer than those in other Tusayan villages. This impression partly comes from the practice of regularly renewing the mud plaster coating. In most villages, little effort goes into repairing the homes until the owners believe that delaying repairs might compromise their stability. Many of the illustrations in this chapter show the amount of rough masonry typically exposed in the walls. At Shumopavi (Pl. XXXV), however, most of the walls are smoothly plastered. In this way, they resemble the Zuñi and eastern pueblos, where little bare masonry is visible. Another aspect that contributes to the neat and polished appearance of this village is the regular use of a whitewash made from gypsum on the outer walls. This wash serves both as decoration and protection against rain. The material, referred to by Mexicans as “yeso,” is very commonly used inside their homes throughout this region, by both Mexicans and Native Americans. Less frequently, it’s applied as an external wash among the pueblos. Here, though, its external application stands out as a unique characteristic of the village. The same practice seen in several cliff houses of Canyon de Chelly indicates that this custom has a relatively long history, although it doesn’t necessarily have pre-Columbian origins.
Shumopavi, compared with the other villages, shows less evidence of having been built on the open court idea, as the partial inclosures assume such elongated forms in the direction of the long, straight rows of the rooms; yet examination shows that the idea was present to a slight extent.
Shumopavi, compared to the other villages, shows less evidence of having been built around the open court concept, as the partial enclosures take on such elongated shapes along the long, straight lines of the rooms; however, a closer look reveals that the idea was there to some degree.
At the southeast corner of the pueblo there is a very marked approach to the open court, though it is quite evident that the easternmost row has its back to the court, and that the few rooms that face the other way are later additions. In fact, the plan of the village and the distribution of the terraces seem to indicate that the first construction consisted only of a single row facing nearly east, and was not an inclosed court, and that a further addition to the pueblo assumed nearly the same form, with its face or terraced side toward the back of the first row only partly adapting itself by the addition of a few small rooms later, to the court arrangement, the same operation being continued, but in a form not so clearly defined, still farther toward the west.
At the southeast corner of the pueblo, there's a clear path to the open court, although it's obvious that the easternmost row has its back turned to the court, and the few rooms that do face the court were added later. In fact, the layout of the village and the arrangement of the terraces suggest that the original construction was just a single row facing almost east and didn't form an enclosed court. Later additions to the pueblo followed a similar design, with the terraced side facing the back of the first row, only partly adjusting to the court layout by adding a few small rooms over time. This process continued, but in a less distinct manner, further to the west.
The second court is not defined on the west by such a distinct row as the others, and the smaller clusters that to some extent break the long, straight arrangement bring about an approximation to a court, though here again the terraces only partly face it, the eastern side being bounded by the long exterior wall of the middle row, two and three stories high, and almost unbroken throughout its entire length of 400 feet. The broken character of the small western row, in conjunction with the clusters near it, imparts a distinct effect to the plan of this portion, differentiating it in character from the masses of houses formed by the other two rows. The latter are connected at their southern end by a short cross row which converts this portion of the village practically into a single large house. Two covered passageways, however, which are designated on the plan, give access to the southeast portion of the court. This portion is partly separated from the north half of the inclosure by encroaching groups of rooms. This partial division of the original narrow and long court appears to be of later date.
The second courtyard isn't clearly defined on the west like the others. The smaller clusters, which slightly break up the long, straight layout, create a sense of a courtyard, though the terraces only partially face it. The eastern side is bordered by the tall outer wall of the middle row, which stands two to three stories high and stretches almost unbroken for 400 feet. The irregular shape of the small western row, combined with the nearby clusters, gives this area a unique feel, setting it apart from the larger groups of houses formed by the other two rows. These rows are connected at their southern end by a short cross row, which essentially makes this part of the village one large house. However, two covered passageways marked on the plan provide access to the southeast part of the courtyard. This area is partially separated from the northern half of the enclosure by encroaching clusters of rooms. This partial division of the originally narrow and long courtyard seems to have been added later.
The kivas are four in number, of which but one is within the village. The latter occupies a partly inclosed position in the southwest portion, and probably owes its place to some local facility for building a kiva on this spot in the nature of a depression in the mesa summit; but even 75 with such aid the ceremonial chamber was built only partly under ground, as may be seen in Fig. 14. The remaining three kivas are more distinctly subterranean, and in order to obtain a suitable site one of these was located at a distance of more than 200 feet from the village, toward the mesa edge on the east. The other two are built very close together, apparently in contact, just beyond the northern extremity of the village. One of these is about 3 feet above the surface at one corner, but nearly on a level with the ground at its western side where it adjoins its neighbor. These two kivas are illustrated in Pl. LXXXVIII and Fig. 21.
The kivas are four in total, but only one is in the village. The one in the village is partly enclosed and located in the southwest area, likely due to some local feature that allowed for building a kiva on this spot, which is somewhat of a dip in the mesa top. However, even with that advantage, the ceremonial chamber was only built partly underground, as you can see in Fig. 14. The other three kivas are more clearly underground, and to find a suitable site, one of them was placed more than 200 feet away from the village, towards the edge of the mesa to the east. The remaining two kivas are built very close together, seeming to touch, just beyond the northern edge of the village. One of these is about 3 feet above ground at one end, but nearly level with the ground on its western side where it connects to its neighbor. These two kivas are depicted in Pl. 88 and Fig. 21.
Fig. 14. Court kiva of Shumopavi.
Court kiva of Shumopavi.
Here again we find that the ceremonial chamber that forms so important a feature among these people, occupies no fixed relation to the dwellings, and its location is largely a matter of accident, a site that would admit of the partial excavation or sinking of the chamber below the surface being the main requisite. The northwest court contains another of the small inclosed shrines already described as occurring at Shupaulovi and elsewhere.
Here again we see that the ceremonial chamber, which is such an important aspect of these people, doesn't have a fixed position relative to the homes, and its placement is mostly random, needing only a spot that allows for some partial digging or lowering of the chamber below ground level. The northwest court has another one of the small enclosed shrines already mentioned that can be found at Shupaulovi and other places.
The stonework of this village also possesses a somewhat distinctive character. Exposed masonry, though comparatively rare in this well-plastered pueblo, shows that stones of suitable fracture were selected and that they were more carefully laid than in the other villages. In places the masonry bears a close resemblance to some of the ancient work, where the spaces between the longer tablets of stone were carefully chinked with small bits of stone, bringing the whole wall to a uniform face, and is much in advance of the ordinary slovenly methods of construction followed in Tusayan.
The stonework of this village has a unique character. Exposed masonry, although quite rare in this well-plastered village, indicates that stones with appropriate fractures were chosen and that they were laid with more care than in other villages. In some areas, the masonry closely resembles ancient work, where the gaps between the longer stones were meticulously filled with small pieces of stone, creating a uniform wall surface, and is far superior to the typical careless construction methods used in Tusayan.
Shumopavi is the successor of an older village of that name, one of the cities of the ancient Tusayan visited by a detachment of Coronado’s expedition in 1540. The ruins of that village still exist, and they formerly contained vestiges of the old church and mission buildings established 76 by the monks. The squared beams from, these buildings were considered valuable enough to be incorporated in the construction of ceremonial kivas in some of the Tusayan villages. This old site was not visited by the party.
Shumopavi is the successor to an older village of the same name, one of the towns in ancient Tusayan that Coronado’s expedition visited in 1540. The ruins of that village still exist, and they used to have remnants of the old church and mission buildings established 76 by the monks. The squared beams from these buildings were seen as valuable enough to be used in the construction of ceremonial kivas in some of the Tusayan villages. This old site was not visited by the group.
ORAIBI.
This is one of the largest modern pueblos, and contains nearly half the population of Tusayan; yet its great size has not materially affected the arrangement of the dwellings. The general plan (see Pl. XXXVI), simply shows an unusually large collection of typical Tusayan house-rows, with the general tendency to face eastward displayed in the other villages of the group. There is a remarkable uniformity in the direction of the rows, but there are no indications of the order in which the successive additions to the village were made, such as were found at Mashóngnavi.
This is one of the largest modern pueblos and makes up almost half the population of Tusayan; however, its significant size hasn’t really changed how the homes are arranged. The overall layout (see Pl. XXXVI) simply shows an unusually large grouping of typical Tusayan house rows, with the usual eastward orientation seen in other villages of the area. There’s a notable consistency in the direction of the rows, but there are no signs of the sequence in which the village was expanded, unlike what was found at Mashóngnavi.
The white strip along the middle of this plan represents the area near a tight fold in the printed original. The width of the unreadable area is conjectural.
The white strip in the center of this plan shows the area near a tight fold in the printed original. The width of the unreadable area is uncertain.
Plate XXXVII. Key to the Oraibi plan, also showing localization of gentes.
Plate XXXVII. Key to the Oraibi plan, also showing the location of gentes.
The clusters of rooms do not surpass the average dimensions of those in the smaller villages. In five of the clusters in Oraibi a height of four stories is reached by a few rooms; a height seen also in Walpi.
The groups of rooms are no bigger than those found in the smaller villages. In five of the groups in Oraibi, a few rooms reach a height of four stories, which is also seen in Walpi.
Plate XXXVIII. A court of Oraibi.
Plate XXXVIII. A court of Oraibi.
At several points in Oraibi, notably on the west side of cluster No. 7, may be seen what appears to be low terraces faced with rough masonry. The same thing is also seen at Walpi, on the west side of the northernmost cluster. This effect is produced by the gradual filling in of abandoned and broken-down marginal houses, with fallen masonry and drifted sand. The appearance is that of intentional construction, as may be seen in Pl. XXXIX.
At several points in Oraibi, especially on the west side of cluster No. 7, you can see what looks like low terraces made of rough stone. The same thing is also visible at Walpi, on the west side of the northernmost cluster. This effect comes from the gradual filling in of abandoned and crumbling houses at the edges, with fallen stone and blown sand. It looks like it was intentionally built, as can be seen in Pl. XXXIX.
Plate XXXIX. Masonry terraces of Oraibi.
Plate XXXIX. Brick terraces of Oraibi.
The rarity of covered passageways in this village is noteworthy, and emphasizes the marked difference in the character of the Tusayan and Zuñi ground plans. The close crowding of rooms in the latter has made a feature of the covered way, which in the scattered plan of Oraibi is rarely called for. When found it does not seem an outgrowth of the same conditions that led to its adoption in Zuñi. A glance at the plans will show how different has been the effect of the immediate environment in the two cases. In Zuñi, built on a very slight knoll in the open plain, the absence of a defensive site has produced unusual development of the defensive features of the architecture, and the result is a remarkably dense clustering of the dwellings. At Tusayan, on the other hand, the largest village of the group does not differ in character from the smallest. Occupation of a defensive site has there, in a measure taken the place of a special defensive arrangement, or close clustering of rooms. Oraibi is laid out quite as openly as any other of the group, and as additions to its size have from time to time been made the builders have, in the absence of the defensive motive for crowding the rows or groups into large clusters, simply followed the usual arrangement. The crowding that brought about the use of the covered way was due in Walpi to restricted site, as nearly all the available summit of its rocky promontory has been covered with buildings. In Zuñi, on 77 the other hand, it was the necessity for defense that led to the close clustering of the dwellings and the consequent employment of the covered way.
The rarity of covered walkways in this village is significant and highlights the stark difference in the layout between Tusayan and Zuñi. The closely packed rooms in Zuñi have made covered walkways a necessity, while in the more spread out plan of Oraibi, they are rarely needed. When they do appear, they don’t seem to stem from the same reasons that led to their use in Zuñi. A quick look at the layouts shows how differently the immediate surroundings have influenced the two locations. In Zuñi, built on a slight hill in the open plain, the lack of a defensive location has led to an unusual development of defensive architecture, resulting in a very dense arrangement of homes. In contrast, Tusayan, the largest village in the group, does not differ in character from the smallest. The choice of a defensive location there has somewhat replaced the need for tightly packed rooms or special defensive features. Oraibi is laid out as openly as any other village in the group, and as it has expanded over time, the builders have simply followed the usual layout since there’s no defensive reason to cluster buildings closely together. The tight spacing that led to the use of covered walkways in Walpi was due to limited space, as almost the entire summit of its rocky promontory is covered with buildings. In Zuñi, however, it was the need for defense that resulted in the close clustering of homes and the use of covered walkways.
Plate XL. Oraibi house row, showing court side.
Plate XL. Oraibi house row, showing the courtyard side.
A further contrast between the general plans of Oraibi and Zuñi is afforded in the different manner in which the roof openings have been employed in the two cases. The plan of Zuñi, Pl. LXXVI, shows great numbers of small openings, nearly all of which are intended exclusively for the admission of light, a few only being provided with ladders. In Oraibi, on the other hand, there are only seventeen roof openings above the first terrace, and of these not more than half are intended for the admission of light. The device is correspondingly rare in other villages of the group, particularly in those west of the first mesa. In Mashóngnavi the restricted use of the roof openings is particularly noticeable; they all are of the same type as those used for access to first terrace rooms. There is but one roof opening in a second story. An examination of the plan, Pl. XXX, will show that in Shupaúlovi but two such openings occur above the first terrace, and in the large village of Shumopavi, Pl. XXXIV, only about eight. None of the smaller villages can be fairly compared with Zuñi in the employment of this feature, but in Oraibi we should expect to find its use much more general, were it not for the fact that the defensive site has taken the place of the close clustering of rooms seen in the exposed village of Zuñi, and, in consequence, the devices for the admission of light still adhere to the more primitive arrangement (Pls. XL and XLI).
A further contrast between the overall designs of Oraibi and Zuñi can be seen in how the roof openings are used in each case. The plan of Zuñi, Pl. L76, features many small openings, most of which are solely for letting in light, with only a few equipped with ladders. In Oraibi, however, there are only seventeen roof openings above the first terrace, and not more than half of these are meant for light. This feature is also quite rare in other villages in the area, especially those west of the first mesa. In Mashóngnavi, the limited use of roof openings is especially evident; they are all similar to those used for access to first terrace rooms. There’s only one roof opening on the second story. Looking at the plan, Pl. XXX, we see that in Shupaúlovi, there are only two such openings above the first terrace, and in the larger village of Shumopavi, Pl. XXXIV, there are only about eight. None of the smaller villages can be truly compared to Zuñi in terms of this feature, but we would expect to see more use of it in Oraibi, were it not for the fact that the defensive site has replaced the close arrangement of rooms seen in the more exposed village of Zuñi. As a result, the openings for light still follow a more primitive layout (Pls. XL and XLI).
Plate XLI. Back of Oraibi house row.
Plate XLI. Back of Oraibi house row.
The highest type of pueblo construction, embodied in the large communal fortress houses of the valleys, could have developed only as the builders learned to rely for protection more upon their architecture and less upon the sites occupied. So long as the sites furnished a large proportion of the defensive efficiency of a village, the invention of the builders was not stimulated to substitute artificial for natural advantages. Change of location and consequent development must frequently have taken place owing to the extreme inconvenience of defensive sites to the sources of subsistence.
The most advanced type of pueblo building, seen in the large communal fortress houses in the valleys, could only have come about as the builders began to depend more on their architecture for protection and less on the places they chose. As long as the locations provided a significant amount of the village's defense, the builders weren't motivated to trade natural advantages for artificial ones. Relocation and development likely happened often because the defensive sites were extremely inconvenient for accessing food sources.
The builders of large valley pueblos must frequently have been forced to resort hastily to defensive sites on finding that the valley towns were unfitted to withstand attack. This seems to have been the case with the Tusayan; but that the Zuñi have adhered to their valley pueblo through great difficulties is clearly attested by the internal evidence of the architecture itself, even were other testimony altogether wanting.
The builders of large valley pueblos must have often had to quickly move to defensive sites when they realized that the valley towns couldn't withstand attacks. This appears to have happened with the Tusayan; however, the fact that the Zuñi have remained in their valley pueblo despite significant challenges is clearly shown by the architecture itself, even if there were no other evidence.
Plate XLIV. Moen-kopi.
Plate 44. Moen-kopi.
MOEN-KOPI.
About 50 miles west from Oraibi is a small settlement used by a few families from Oraibi during the farming season, known as Moen-kopi. (Pl. XLIII). The present village is comparatively recent, but, as is the case with many others, it has been built over the remains of an older settlement. It is said to have been founded within the memory of 78 some of the Mormon pioneers at the neighboring town of Tuba City, named after an old Oraibi chief, recently deceased.
About 50 miles west of Oraibi, there's a small settlement where a few families from Oraibi stay during the farming season, called Moen-kopi. (Pl. XLIII). This current village is relatively new, but like many others, it's been built over the remains of an older settlement. It's said to have been established within the memory of some of the Mormon pioneers in the nearby town of Tuba City, which is named after an old Oraibi chief who recently passed away.
The site would probably have attracted a much larger number of settlers, had it not been so remote from the main pueblos of the province, as in many respects it far surpasses any of the present village sites. A large area of fertile soil can be conveniently irrigated from copious springs in the side of a small branch of the Moen-kopi wash. The village occupies a low, rounded knoll at the junction of this branch with the main wash, which on the opposite or southern side is quite precipitous. The gradual encroachments of the Mormons for the last twenty years have had some effect in keeping the Tusayan from more fully utilizing the advantages of this site (Pl. XLII).
The site probably would have drawn a lot more settlers if it weren't so far from the main pueblos of the province, as it really exceeds any of the current village locations in many ways. A large area of fertile soil can be easily irrigated from plenty of springs on a small branch of the Moen-kopi wash. The village sits on a low, rounded knoll where this branch meets the main wash, which is quite steep on the southern side. For the past twenty years, the Mormons have gradually encroached, which has limited the Tusayan people from fully taking advantage of this site (Pl. XLII).
Plate XLII. The site of Moen-kopi.
Plate XLII. The location of Moen-kopi.
Moen-kopi is built in two irregular rows of one-story houses. There are also two detached single rooms in the village—one of them built for a kiva, though apparently not in use at the time of our survey, and the other a small room with its principal door facing an adjoining row. The arrangement is about the same that prevails in the other villages, the rows having distinct back walls of rude masonry.
Moen-kopi is made up of two uneven rows of one-story houses. There are also two separate single rooms in the village—one was built for a kiva, although it didn’t seem to be in use during our survey, and the other is a small room with its main door facing an adjacent row. The layout is similar to what you find in other villages, with the rows having solid back walls made of rough stone.
Rough stone work predominates also in the fronts of the houses, though it is occasionally brought to a fair degree of finish. Some adobe work is incorporated in the masonry, and at one point a new and still unroofed room was seen built of adobe bricks on a stone foundation about a foot high. There is but little adobe masonry, however, in Tusayan. Its use in this case is probably due to Mormon influence.
Rough stonework is common on the fronts of the houses, although sometimes it’s finished quite nicely. Some adobe work is included in the masonry, and at one spot we saw a new, still-unroofed room made of adobe bricks on a stone foundation about a foot high. However, there isn't much adobe masonry in Tusayan. Its use here is likely due to Mormon influence.
Moen-kopi was the headquarters of a large business enterprise of the Mormons a number of years ago. They attempted to concentrate the product of the Navajo wool trade at this point and to establish here a completely appointed woolen mill. Water was brought from a series of reservoirs built in a small valley several miles away, and was conducted to a point on the Moen-kopi knoll, near the end of the south row of houses, where the ditch terminated in a solidly constructed box of masonry. From this in turn the water was delivered through a large pipe to a turbine wheel, which furnished the motive power for the works. The ditch and masonry are shown on the ground plan of the village (Pl. XLIII). This mill was a large stone building, and no expense was spared in fitting it up with the most complete machinery. At the time of our visit the whole establishment had been abandoned for some years and was rapidly going to decay. The frames had been torn from the windows, and both the floor of the building and the ground in its vicinity were strewn with fragments of expensive machinery, broken cog-wheels, shafts, etc. This building is shown in Pl. XLV, and may serve as an illustration of the contrast between Tusayan masonry and modern stonemason’s work carried out with the same material. The comparison, however, is not entirely fair, as applied to the pueblo builders in general, as the Tusayan mason is unusually careless in his work. Many old examples are seen in which the finish of the walls compares very 79 favorably with the American mason’s work, though the result is attained in a wholly different manner, viz, by close and careful chinking with numberless small tablets of stone. This process brings the wall to a remarkably smooth and even surface, the joints almost disappearing in the mosaic-like effect of the wall mass. The masonry of Moen-kopi is more than ordinarily rough, as the small village was probably built hastily and used for temporary occupation as a farming center. In the winter the place is usually abandoned, the few families occupying it during the farming months returning to Oraibi for the season of festivities and ceremonials.
Moen-kopi used to be the headquarters of a large Mormon business a number of years ago. They tried to gather the products from the Navajo wool trade here and establish a fully equipped woolen mill. Water was brought in from a series of reservoirs built in a small valley a few miles away and directed to a spot on the Moen-kopi knoll, near the south row of houses, where the ditch ended in a solid masonry box. From there, the water flowed through a large pipe to a turbine wheel that powered the mill. The ditch and masonry are shown on the ground plan of the village (Pl. XLIII). The mill itself was a large stone building, and every effort was made to equip it with the latest machinery. At the time of our visit, the entire establishment had been abandoned for several years and was quickly falling into disrepair. The window frames had been removed, and both the floor of the building and the surrounding area were littered with pieces of expensive machinery, broken cog-wheels, shafts, and more. This building is depicted in Pl. XLV and illustrates the difference between Tusayan masonry and modern stonework done with the same materials. However, the comparison isn't entirely fair to the pueblo builders in general since Tusayan masons are notably careless in their work. Many older examples show wall finishes that compare quite favorably with American masonry, although they achieve this through extensive and careful chinking with numerous small stone pieces. This technique creates a remarkably smooth and even surface, making the joints almost disappear in the mosaic-like appearance of the wall. The masonry at Moen-kopi is rougher than usual, likely because the small village was built quickly and intended for temporary use as a farming center. In winter, the place is typically abandoned, with the few families living there during the farming months returning to Oraibi for the festive and ceremonial season.
Plate XLV. The Mormon mill at Moen-kopi.
Plate XLV. The Mormon mill at Moen-kopi.
CHAPTER III.
RUINS AND INHABITED VILLAGES OF CIBOLA.
PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE PROVINCE.
Though the surroundings of the Cibolan pueblos and ruins exhibit the ordinary characteristics of plateau scenery, they have not the monotonous and forbidding aspect that characterizes the mesas and valleys of Tusayan. The dusty sage brush and the stunted cedar and piñon, as in Tusayan, form a conspicuous feature of the landscape, but the cliffs are often diversified in color, being in cases composed of alternating bands of light gray and dark red sandstone, which impart a considerable variety of tints to the landscape. The contrast is heightened by the proximity of the Zuñi Mountains, an extensive timber-bearing range that approaches within 12 miles of Zuñi, narrowing down the extent of the surrounding arid region.
Though the surroundings of the Cibolan pueblos and ruins show the typical features of plateau scenery, they don't have the dull and intimidating look that defines the mesas and valleys of Tusayan. The dusty sagebrush and the short cedar and piñon trees, like in Tusayan, stand out in the landscape, but the cliffs are often varied in color, sometimes made up of alternating bands of light gray and dark red sandstone, which add a lot of different shades to the scenery. The contrast is intensified by the nearby Zuñi Mountains, a large forested range that comes within 12 miles of Zuñi, reducing the size of the surrounding dry area.
Cibola has also been more generously treated by nature in the matter of water supply, as the province contains a perennial stream which has its sources near the village of Nutria, and, flowing past the pueblo of Zuñi, disappears a few miles below. During the rainy season the river empties into the Colorado Chiquito. The Cibolan pueblos are built on the foothills of mesas or in open valley sites, surrounded by broad fields, while the Tusayan villages are perched upon mesa promontories that overlook the valley lands used for cultivation.
Cibola has also been favored by nature when it comes to water supply, as the region has a constant stream originating near the village of Nutria, flowing past the pueblo of Zuñi before vanishing a few miles downstream. During the rainy season, the river flows into the Colorado Chiquito. The Cibolan pueblos are situated on the foothills of mesas or in open valley areas, surrounded by wide fields, while the Tusayan villages are located on mesa cliffs that overlook the valley lands used for farming.
PLANS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF RUINS.
Plate XLVII. Hawikuh, view.
Plate 47. Hawikuh, view.
HAWIKUH.
The village of Hawikuh, situated about 15 miles to the south of Zuñi, consisted of irregular groups of densely clustered cells, occupying the point of a spur projecting from a low rounded hill. The houses are in such a ruined condition that few separate rooms can be traced, and these are much obscured by débris. This débris covers the entire area extending down the east slope of the hill to the site of the church. The large amount of débris and the comparative thinness of such walls as are found suggest that the dwellings had been densely clustered, and carried to the height of several stories. Much of the space between the village on the hill and the site of the Spanish church on the plain at its foot is covered with masonry débris, part of which has slid down from above (Pl. XLVI).
The village of Hawikuh, located about 15 miles south of Zuñi, was made up of irregular groups of closely packed buildings, sitting at the edge of a low rounded hill. The houses are in such ruins that it’s hard to identify separate rooms, and they are largely hidden by debris. This debris covers the entire area extending down the east slope of the hill to the church site. The large amount of debris and the relatively thin walls that can still be seen suggest that the homes were closely grouped together and built up to several stories high. Much of the space between the hilltop village and the site of the Spanish church on the plain below is covered with stone debris, some of which has slid down from above (Pl. XLVI).
81 The arrangement suggests a large principal court of irregular form. The surrounding clusters are very irregularly disposed, the directions of the prevailing lines of walls greatly varying in different groups. There is a suggestion also of several smaller courts, as well as of alleyways leading to the principal one.
81 The layout indicates a large main courtyard with an uneven shape. The surrounding clusters are arranged quite randomly, with the orientations of the main walls differing significantly among various groups. There's also a hint of several smaller courtyards, along with pathways that connect to the main one.
The church, built on the plain below at a distance of about 200 feet from the main village, seems to have been surrounded by several groups of rooms and inclosures of various sizes, differing somewhat in character from those within the village. These groups are scattered and open, and the small amount of debris leads to the conclusion that this portion of the village was not more than a single story in height. (Pl. XLVII.)
The church, located on the plain below about 200 feet away from the main village, appears to have been surrounded by several clusters of rooms and enclosures of different sizes, which are somewhat different in style from those within the village. These clusters are spread out and open, and the minimal debris suggests that this part of the village was likely no more than one story tall. (Pl. XLVII.)
The destruction of the village has been so complete that no vestige of constructional details remains, with the exception of a row of posts in a building near the church. The governor of Zuñi stated that these posts were part of a projecting porch similar to those seen in connection with modern houses. (See Pls. LXXI, LXXV.) Suggestions of this feature are met with at other points on the plain, but they all occur within the newer portion of the village around the church. Some of the larger inclosures in this portion of the village were very lightly constructed, and cover large areas. They were probably used as corrals. Inclosures for this purpose occur at other pueblos traditionally ascribed to the same age.
The destruction of the village has been so thorough that there's no trace of construction details left, except for a row of posts in a building near the church. The governor of Zuñi mentioned that these posts were part of a projecting porch similar to those seen in modern houses. (See Pls. LXXI, 75.) Signs of this feature can be found at other spots on the plain, but they all appear within the newer section of the village around the church. Some of the larger enclosures in this part of the village were very lightly built and cover large areas. They were probably used as corrals. Enclosures for this purpose can also be found in other pueblos that are traditionally believed to be from the same era.
Plate XLVIII. Adobe church at Hawikuh.
Plate XLVIII. Adobe church at Hawikuh.
The church in this village was constructed of adobe bricks, without the introduction of any stonework. The bricks appear to have been molded with an unusual degree of care. The massive angles of the northwest, or altar end of the structure, have survived the stonework of the adjoining village and stand to-day 13 feet high. (Pl. XLVIII.)
The church in this village was built from adobe bricks, without any stone added. The bricks seem to have been shaped with a remarkable level of attention. The large corners on the northwest side, or altar end of the building, have withstood the stonework from the nearby village and still stand 13 feet tall today. (Pl. XLVIII.)
Plate L. Ketchipauan.
Plate L. Ketchipauan.
KETCHIPAUAN.
The small village of Ketchipauan appears to have been arranged about two courts of unequal dimensions. It is difficult to determine, however, how much of the larger court, containing the stone church, is of later construction. (Pl. XLIX.)
The small village of Ketchipauan seems to have been laid out around two courts of different sizes. However, it's hard to tell how much of the larger court, which has the stone church, was built later. (Pl. 49.)
All the northwest portion of the village is now one large inclosure or corral, whose walls have apparently been built of the fallen masonry from the surrounding houses, leaving the central space clear. This wall on the northeast side of the large inclosure apparently follows the jogs and angles of the original houses. This may have been the outer line of rooms, as traces of buildings occur for some distance within it. On the opposite side the wall is nearly continuous, the jogs being of slight projection. Here some traces of dwellings occur outside of the wall in places to a depth of three rooms. The same thing occurs also at the north corner. The continuation of these lines suggests a rectangular court of considerable size, bounded symmetrically by groups of compartments averaging three rooms deep. (Pl. L.)
The entire northwest part of the village is now one big enclosure or corral, built from the fallen bricks and stones of the surrounding houses, keeping the center clear. The wall on the northeast side of this large enclosure follows the shapes and angles of the original houses. This might have been the outer edge of the rooms since there are signs of buildings for some distance within it. On the other side, the wall is almost continuous, with only slight projections. Here, you can find some signs of homes just outside the wall, extending up to three rooms deep in some areas. The same thing can be seen at the north corner. The continuation of these lines suggests a large rectangular courtyard, symmetrically bordered by groups of sections that are about three rooms deep. (Pl. L.)
Several much smaller inclosures made in the same way occur in the village, but they apparently do not conform to the original courts.
Several much smaller enclosures made in the same way exist in the village, but they don’t seem to match the original courts.
82 At the present time dwelling rooms are traceable over a portion of the area south and west of the church. As shown on the plan, upright posts occasionally occur. These appear to have been incorporated into the original walls, but the latter are so ruined that this can not be stated positively, as such posts have sometimes been incorporated in modern corral walls. In places they suggest the balcony-like feature seen in modern houses, as in Hawikuh, but in the east portion of the pueblo they are irregularly scattered about the rooms. A considerable area on the west side of the ruin is covered with loosely scattered stones, affording no suggestions of a ground plan. They do not seem sufficient in amount to be the remains of dwelling rooms.
82 Currently, living spaces can be found in some areas south and west of the church. As shown on the plan, upright posts are occasionally present. These seem to have been part of the original walls, but the walls are so damaged that we can't say for sure, as such posts have sometimes been included in modern corral walls. In some spots, they resemble the balcony features seen in modern homes, like those in Hawikuh, but in the eastern part of the pueblo, they are scattered irregularly throughout the rooms. A large area on the west side of the ruin is covered with loosely scattered stones, providing no hints of a floor plan. There doesn't seem to be enough stone to indicate the remains of living spaces.
Plate LI. Stone church at Ketchipauan.
Plate LI. Stone church at Ketchipauan.
The Spanish church in this pueblo was built of stone, but the walls were much more massive than those of the dwellings. The building is well preserved, most of the walls standing 8 or 10 feet high, and in places 14 feet. This church was apparently built by Indian labor, as the walls everywhere show the chinking with small stones characteristic of the native work. In this village also, the massive Spanish construction has survived the dwelling houses.
The Spanish church in this town was made of stone, but the walls were much thicker than those of the houses. The building is in good shape, with most of the walls standing 8 to 10 feet high, and in some spots, up to 14 feet. This church was likely built by Indian labor, as the walls show the characteristic chinking with small stones typical of native craftsmanship. In this village, the robust Spanish architecture has outlasted the residential homes.
The ground plan of the church shows that the openings were splayed in the thickness of the walls, at an angle of about 45°. In the doorway, in the east end of the building, the greater width of the opening is on the inside, a rather unusual arrangement; in the window, on the north side, this arrangement is reversed, the splay being outward. On the south side are indications of a similar opening, but at the present time the wall is so broken out that no well defined jamb can be traced, and it is impossible to determine whether the splayed opening was used or not. The stones of the masonry are laid with extreme care at the angles and in the faces of these splays, producing a highly finished effect.
The floor plan of the church shows that the openings were slanted within the thickness of the walls at about a 45° angle. In the doorway at the east end of the building, the wider part of the opening is on the inside, which is a pretty unusual setup; on the window on the north side, this setup is flipped, with the slope directed outward. The south side shows signs of a similar opening, but right now the wall is so damaged that no clear jamb can be seen, making it impossible to tell if the slanted opening was ever used. The stones in the masonry are placed with great precision at the corners and along the faces of these slopes, creating a highly polished look.
The position of the beam-holes on the inner face of the wall suggests that the floor of the church had been raised somewhat above the ground, and that there may have been a cellar-like space under it. No beams are now found, however, and no remains of wood are seen in the “altar” end of the church. At the present time there are low partitions dividing the inclosed area into six rooms or cells. The Indians state that these were built at a late date to convert the church into a defense against the hostile Apache from the south. These partitions apparently formed no part of the original design, yet it is difficult to see how they could have served as a defense, unless they were intended to be roofed over and thus converted into completely inclosed rooms. A stone of somewhat larger size than usual has been built into the south wall of the church. Upon its surface some native artist has engraved a rudely drawn mask.
The position of the beam holes on the inner wall suggests that the church floor was raised above the ground level, indicating there might have been a cellar-like area underneath. However, there are no beams left now, and no wooden remains are visible at the "altar" end of the church. Currently, there are low walls dividing the enclosed space into six rooms or cells. The local people say these were added later to turn the church into a defense against the hostile Apache from the south. These partitions don't seem to be part of the original design, but it's hard to understand how they could have functioned as a defense unless they were meant to have roofs, making them completely enclosed rooms. A stone larger than usual has been incorporated into the south wall of the church, and on its surface, a local artist has carved a roughly drawn mask.
About 150 yards southeast from the church, and on the edge of the low mesa upon which the ruin stands, has been constructed a reservoir of large size which furnished the pueblo with a reserve water supply. The ordinary supply was probably derived from the valley below, where 83 water is found at no great distance from the pueblo. Springs may also have formerly existed near the village, but this reservoir, located where the drainage of a large area discharges, must have materially increased the water supply. The basin or depression is about 110 feet in diameter and its present depth in the center is about 4 feet; but it has undoubtedly been filled in by sediment since its abandonment. More than half of its circumference was originally walled in, but at the present time the old masonry is indicated only by an interrupted row of large foundation stones and fallen masonry. Some large stones, apparently undisturbed portions of the mesa edge, have been incorporated into the inclosing masonry. The Indians stated that originally the bottom of this basin was lined with stones, but these statements could not be verified. Without excavation on the upper side, the basin faded imperceptibly into the rising ground of the surrounding drainage. Other examples of these basin reservoirs are met with in this region.
About 150 yards southeast of the church, on the edge of the low mesa where the ruin stands, a large reservoir was built to provide the pueblo with a reserve water supply. The regular water source likely came from the valley below, where water is found not far from the pueblo. There may have also been springs near the village at one time, but this reservoir, located where the drainage from a large area flows, must have significantly increased the water supply. The basin or depression is about 110 feet in diameter, and its current depth in the center is around 4 feet; however, it has certainly filled in with sediment since it was abandoned. More than half of its circumference was originally walled in, but today the old masonry is only marked by an interrupted line of large foundation stones and crumbled masonry. Some large stones, which seem to be undisturbed parts of the mesa edge, have been incorporated into the enclosing structure. The Indians said that the bottom of this basin was originally lined with stones, but this could not be confirmed. Without excavation on the upper side, the basin gradually blended into the rising ground of the surrounding drainage. Other examples of these basin reservoirs can be found in this area.
CHALOWE.
About 15° north of west from Hawikuh, and distant 1½ miles from it, begins the series of ruins called Chalowe. They are located on two low elevations or foothills extending in a southwestern direction from the group of hills, upon whose eastern extremity Hawikuh is built. The southernmost of the series covers a roughly circular area about 40 feet in diameter. Another cluster, measuring about 30 feet by 20, lies immediately north of it, with an intervening depression of a foot or so. About 475 feet northwest occurs a group of three rooms situated on a slight rise, A little east of north and a half a mile distant from the latter is a small hill, upon which is located a cluster of about the same form and dimensions as the one first described. Several more vaguely defined clusters are traceable near this last one, but they are all of small dimensions.
About 15° north of west from Hawikuh, and 1½ miles away, begins the series of ruins known as Chalowe. They are situated on two low hills extending southwest from the range of hills where Hawikuh is built on the eastern end. The southernmost site covers a roughly circular area about 40 feet in diameter. Another group, measuring about 30 feet by 20, is located just north of it, separated by a shallow dip of about a foot. Approximately 475 feet northwest, there’s a cluster of three rooms on a slight rise. A little east of north and half a mile from that, a small hill has a group that’s roughly the same shape and size as the first one. Several other less distinct clusters can be found near this last one, but they are all relatively small.
This widely scattered series of dwelling clusters, according to the traditional accounts, belonged to one tribe, which was known by the general name of Chalowe. It is said to have been inhabited at the time of the first arrival of the Spaniards. The general character and arrangement however, are so different from the prevailing type in this region that it seems hardly probable that it belonged to the same people and the same age as the other ruins.
This widely spread series of housing clusters, as the traditional accounts say, belonged to one tribe known as the Chalowe. It’s believed that it was lived in when the Spaniards first arrived. However, the overall structure and layout are so different from the typical style in this area that it seems unlikely that it came from the same people or the same time period as the other ruins.
No standing walls are found in any portion of the group, and the small amount of scattered masonry suggests that the rooms were only one story high. Yet the débris of masonry may have been largely covered up by drifting sand. Now it is hardly possible to trace the rooms, and over most of the area only scattered stones mark the positions of the groups of dwellings.
No standing walls can be found anywhere in the area, and the little bit of scattered masonry indicates that the buildings were probably only one story tall. However, much of the masonry debris may have been mostly buried by drifting sand. Now, it’s nearly impossible to identify the rooms, and across most of the site, only scattered stones show where the groups of houses were located.
HAMPASSAWAN.
Of the village of Hampassawan, which is said traditionally to have been one of the seven cities of Cibola visited by Coronado, nothing now 84 remains but two detached rooms, both showing vestiges of an upper story. With this exception, the destruction of the village is complete and only a low rise in the plain marks its site. Owing to its exposed position, the fallen walls have been completely covered with drifting sand and earth, no vestige of the buildings showing through the dense growth of sagebrush that now covers it.
Of the village of Hampassawan, which is traditionally believed to have been one of the seven cities of Cibola visited by Coronado, nothing remains now but two separate rooms, both showing signs of an upper floor. Aside from this, the village has been completely destroyed, and only a slight rise in the flat land indicates its location. Because of its exposed position, the fallen walls are entirely buried under drifting sand and dirt, with no trace of the buildings visible through the thick growth of sagebrush that now covers it.
![]() |
full size Fig. 15. Hampassawan, plan. |
The two surviving rooms referred to appear to have been used from time to time, as outlooks over corn fields close by, and as a defense against the Navajo. Their final abandonment, and that of the cultivation of the adjoining fields, is said to have been due to the killing of a 85 Zuñi there, by the Navajo, within very recent times. These rooms have been several times repaired, the one on the west particularly. In the latter an additional wall has been built upon the northern side, as shown on the plan, Fig. 15. The old roof seems to have survived until recently, for, although at the present time the room is covered with a roof of rudely split cedar beams, the remains of the old, carefully built roof lie scattered about in the corners of the room, under the dirt and débris. The openings are very small and seem to have been modified since the original construction, but it is difficult to distinguish between the older original structure and the more recent additions.
The two remaining rooms seem to have been used occasionally as lookout points over nearby cornfields and as a defense against the Navajo. Their eventual abandonment, along with the farming of the surrounding fields, is said to have resulted from the recent killing of a Zuñi person there by the Navajo. These rooms have been repaired multiple times, especially the one on the west. In that room, an extra wall has been added on the north side, as shown on the plan, Fig. 15. The old roof appears to have lasted until not long ago; even though the room is currently topped with a roof made of roughly split cedar beams, remnants of the old, carefully constructed roof are scattered in the corners of the room, buried under dirt and debris. The openings are very small and seem to have been altered since the original building, but it's hard to tell the difference between the original structure and the newer additions.
Plate LIII. Site of K’iakima, at base of Tâaaiyalana.
Plate LIII. Location of K’iakima, at the foot of Tâaaiyalana.
K’IAKIMA.
On the south side of the isolated mesa of Tâaaiyalana and occupying a high rounded spur of foothills, is the ruined village of K’iakima (Pl. LII). A long gulch on the west side of the spur contains, for 300 or 400 yards, a small stream which is fed from springs near the ruined village.
On the south side of the remote mesa of Tâaaiyalana, there’s a crumbling village called K’iakima (Pl. LII) sitting on a high, rounded foothill. A long gorge on the west side of the spur has a small stream running through it for about 300 or 400 yards, fed by springs close to the abandoned village.
The entire surface of the hill is covered with scattered débris of fallen walls, which must at one time have formed a village of considerable size. Over most of this area the walls can not be traced; the few rooms which can be distinctly outlined, occurring in a group on the highest part of the hill. Standing walls are here seen, but they are apparently recent, one room showing traces of a chimney (Pl. LIV). Some of the more distinct inclosures, built from fallen masonry of the old village, seem to have been intended for corrals. This is the case also with the remains found on the cliffs to the north of the village, whose position is shown on the plan (Pl. LIII). Here nearly all the scattered stones of the original one-story buildings, have been utilized for these large inclosures. It is quite possible that these smaller structures on the ledge of the mesa were built and occupied at a much later date than the principal village. Pl. LIII illustrates a portion of the base of Tâaaiyalana where these inclosures appear.
The whole surface of the hill is covered with scattered debris from fallen walls, which at one time must have formed a fairly large village. In most of this area, the walls can’t be traced; the few rooms that can be clearly outlined are grouped together at the highest point of the hill. There are standing walls here, but they seem to be more recent, with one room showing signs of a chimney (Pl. LIV). Some of the more distinct enclosures, made from the fallen masonry of the old village, appear to have been intended for corrals. This is also true for the remains found on the cliffs to the north of the village, as indicated on the plan (Pl. LIII). Almost all the scattered stones from the original one-story buildings have been repurposed for these large enclosures. It’s quite possible that these smaller structures on the ledge of the mesa were built and occupied much later than the main village. Pl. LIII shows a part of the base of Tâaaiyalana where these enclosures can be seen.
Plate LIV. Recent wall at K’iakima.
Plate LIV. Recent wall at K’iakima.
A striking feature of this ruin is the occurrence in the northeast corner of the village of large upright slabs of stone. The largest of these is about 3 feet wide and stands 5½ feet out of the ground. One of the slabs is of such symmetrical form that it suggests skillful artificial treatment, but the stone was used just as it came from a seam in the cliff above. From the same seam many slabs of nearly equal size and symmetrical form have fallen out and now lie scattered about on the talus below. Some are remarkable for their perfectly rectangular form, while all are distinguished by a notable uniformity in thickness. Close by, and apparently forming part of the same group, are a number of stones imbedded in the ground with their upper edges exposed and placed at right angles to the faces of the vertical monuments. The taller slabs are said by the Indians to have been erected as a defense against the attacks of the Apache upon this pueblo, but only a portion of the group could, from their position, have been of any use for this 86 purpose. The stones probably mark graves. Although thorough excavation of the hard soil could not be undertaken, digging to the depth of 18 inches revealed the same character of pottery fragments, ashes, etc., found in many of the pueblo graves. Mr. E. W. Nelson found identical remains in graves in the Rio San Francisco region which he excavated in collecting pottery. Comparatively little is known, however, of the burial practices of this region, so it would be difficult to decide whether this was an ordinary method of burial or not.
A notable feature of this ruin is the presence of large upright stone slabs in the northeast corner of the village. The largest is about 3 feet wide and stands 5½ feet above the ground. One of the slabs is so symmetrical that it looks like it was skillfully shaped, but the stone was taken just as it came from a seam in the cliff above. From that same seam, many slabs of similar size and symmetry have fallen and now lie scattered on the slopes below. Some are striking for their perfectly rectangular shape, while all share a remarkable uniform thickness. Nearby, and seemingly part of the same group, are several stones embedded in the ground with their upper edges exposed, placed at right angles to the vertical slabs. The taller stones are said by the local Indians to have been erected as a defense against Apache attacks on this pueblo, although only part of the group could have actually been useful for that purpose. The stones likely mark graves. Even though thorough excavation of the hard soil wasn't possible, digging down 18 inches uncovered similar pottery fragments, ashes, and other materials found in many pueblo graves. Mr. E. W. Nelson discovered the same types of remains in graves in the Rio San Francisco region during his pottery collection excavations. However, not much is known about the burial practices in this area, making it hard to determine if this method of burial was common.
This pueblo has been identified by Mr. Cushing, through Zuñi tradition, as the scene of the death of Estevanico, the negro who accompanied the first Spanish expedition to Cibola.
This pueblo has been identified by Mr. Cushing, through Zuñi tradition, as the place where Estevanico, the Black man who traveled with the first Spanish expedition to Cibola, died.
MATSAKI.
Matsaki is situated on a foothill at the base of Tâaaiyalana, near its northwestern extremity. This pueblo is in about the same state of preservation as K’iakima, no complete rooms being traceable over most of the area. Traces of walls, where seen, are not uniform in direction, suggesting irregular grouping of the village. At two points on the plan rooms partially bounded by standing walls are found. These appear to owe their preservation to their occupation as outlooks over fields in the vicinity long after the destruction of the pueblo. One of the two rooms shows only a few feet of rather rude masonry. The walls of the other room, in one corner, stand the height of a full story above the surrounding débris, a low room under it having been partially filled up with fallen masonry and earth. The well preserved inner corner of the exposed room shows lumps of clay adhering here and there to the walls, the remnants of an interior corner chimney. No trace of the supports for a chimney hood, such as occur in the modern fireplaces, could be found. The form outlined against the wall by these slight remains indicates a rather rudely constructed feature which was added at a late date to the room and formed no part of its original construction. It was probably built while the room was used as a farming outlook. As shown on the ground plan (Pl. LV), a small cluster of houses once stood at some little distance to the southwest of the main pueblo and was connected with the latter by a series of rooms. The intervening space may have been a court. At the northern edge of the village a primitive shrine has been erected in recent times and is still in use. It is rudely constructed by simply piling up stones to a height of 2½ or 3 feet, in a rudely rectangular arrangement, with an opening on the east. This shrine, facing east, contains an upright slab of thin sandstone on which a rude sun-symbol has been engraved. The governor of Zuñi, in explaining the purpose of this shrine, compared its use to that of our own astronomical observatories, which he had seen.
Matsaki is located on a foothill at the base of Tâaaiyalana, close to its northwestern end. This village is about as well-preserved as K’iakima, with no complete rooms identifiable over most of the area. Where walls can be seen, they aren’t uniform in direction, indicating a disorganized layout of the village. At two spots on the plan, rooms are partially enclosed by standing walls. Their preservation seems to be due to their use as lookout points over nearby fields long after the village was destroyed. One of the two rooms shows just a few feet of fairly rough masonry. The walls of the other room stand a full story high in one corner above the surrounding debris, with a low room underneath that has partly filled up with fallen masonry and dirt. The well-preserved inner corner of the exposed room shows clumps of clay sticking here and there to the walls, remnants of an interior corner chimney. No traces of the supports for a chimney hood, like those found in modern fireplaces, could be identified. The shape outlined against the wall by these slight remains indicates a rather crudely constructed feature that was added later to the room and was not part of its original design. It was likely built while the room was used as a farm lookout. As illustrated in the ground plan (Pl. LV), a small cluster of houses once stood a little distance southwest of the main village, connected to it by a series of rooms. The space in between may have been a courtyard. At the northern edge of the village, a basic shrine has been built in recent times and is still in use. It is simply constructed by piling up stones to a height of 2½ to 3 feet, arranged in a rough rectangle, with an opening on the east side. This shrine faces east and contains an upright slab of thin sandstone with a crude sun-symbol engraved on it. The governor of Zuñi, explaining the purpose of this shrine, compared its use to that of our own astronomical observatories, which he had seen.
Plate LV. Matsaki, plan.
Plate LV. Matsaki, blueprint.
PINAWA.
![]() |
full size Fig. 16. Pinawa, plan. |
The ruins of the small pueblo of Pinawa occupy a slight rise on the south side of the Zuñi River, a short distance west of Zuñi. The road 87 from Zuñi to Ojo Caliente traverses the ruin. Over most of the area rooms can not be traced. One complete room, however, has been preserved and appears to be still occupied during the cultivation of the neighboring “milpas.” It is roofed over and in good condition, though the general character of the masonry resembles the older work. On the plan (Fig. 16) it will be seen that the stones of the original masonry have been collected and built into a number of large inclosures, which have in turn been partly destroyed. The positions of the entrances to these inclosures can be traced by the absence of stones on the surface. The general outline of the corral-like inclosures appears to have followed comparatively well preserved portions of the original wall, as was the case at Ketchipauan. (Pl. LVI.)
The ruins of the small village of Pinawa sit on a slight rise on the south side of the Zuñi River, just west of Zuñi. The road 87 from Zuñi to Ojo Caliente passes through the ruins. In most areas, the rooms can’t be identified. However, one complete room has been preserved and still seems to be in use during the planting of the nearby “milpas.” It has a roof and is in good condition, although the overall style of the masonry resembles older construction. On the plan (Fig. 16), you can see that the stones from the original masonry have been gathered and built into several large enclosures, which have been partly destroyed. The locations of the entrances to these enclosures can be identified by the missing stones on the surface. The general shape of the corral-like enclosures seems to have followed relatively well-preserved parts of the original wall, similar to what was seen at Ketchipauan. (Pl. LVI.)
Plate LVI. Standing wall at Pinawa.
Plate LVI. Standing wall at Pinawa.
The Ojo Caliente road passes between the main ruin and the standing room above described. The remnants of the fallen masonry are so few and so promiscuously scattered over this area that the continuity of remains can not be fully traced.
The Ojo Caliente road runs between the main ruin and the described standing area. The remnants of the fallen bricks are so few and so randomly scattered across this area that the connection of the remains can't be completely followed.
Plate LVII. Halona excavations as seen from Zuñi.
Plate LVII. Halona excavations viewed from Zuñi.
HALONA.
An ancient pueblo called Halona is said to have belonged to the Cibolan group, and to have been inhabited at the time of the conquest. It occupied a portion of the site upon which the present pueblo of Zuñi stands. A part of this pueblo was built on the opposite side of the river, where the remains of walls were encountered at a slight depth below the surface of the ground in excavating for the foundations of Mr. Cushing’s house. At that time only scattered remains of masonry were met with, and they furnished but little indication of details of plan or arrangement. Later—during the summer of 1888—Mr. Cushing made extensive additions to his house on the south side of the river, and in excavating for the foundations laid bare a number of small rooms. Excavation was continued until December of that year, when a large part of the ancient village had been exposed. Pl. LVII, from a photograph, illustrates a portion of these remains as seen from the southwest corner of Zuñi. The view was taken in the morning during a light fall of snow which, lightly covering the tops of the walls left standing in the excavations, sharply defined their outlines against the shadows of the rooms.
An ancient pueblo called Halona is said to have been part of the Cibolan group and was inhabited at the time of the conquest. It occupied part of the site where the current pueblo of Zuñi stands. Some of this pueblo was built on the other side of the river, where the remains of walls were found just below the surface while digging for the foundations of Mr. Cushing’s house. At that time, there were only scattered bits of masonry, which provided little detail about the layout or arrangement. Later, during the summer of 1888, Mr. Cushing expanded his house on the south side of the river, and while digging for the foundations, several small rooms were uncovered. Excavation continued until December of that year, revealing a large part of the ancient village. Pl. LVII, from a photograph, shows a portion of these remains as viewed from the southwest corner of Zuñi. The photo was taken in the morning during a light snowfall that gently covered the tops of the walls still standing in the excavations, sharply outlining their shapes against the shadows of the rooms.
It seems impossible to restore the entire outline of the portion of Halona that has served as a nucleus for modern Zuñi from such data as can be procured. At several points of the present village, however, vestiges of the old pueblo can be identified. Doubtless if access could be obtained to all the innermost rooms of the pueblo some of them would show traces of ancient methods of construction sufficient, at least, to admit of a restoration of the general form of the ancient pueblo. At the time the village was surveyed such examination was not practicable. The portion of the old pueblo serving as a nucleus for later construction would probably be found under houses Nos. 1 and 4, forming practically one mass of rooms. Strangers and outsiders are not admitted to these innermost rooms. Outcrops in the small cluster No. 2 indicate by their position a continuous wall of the old pueblo, probably the external one. Portions of the ancient outer wall are probably incorporated into the west side of cluster No. 1. On the north side of cluster No. 2 (see Pl. LXXVI) may be seen a buttress-like projection whose construction of small tabular stones strongly contrasts with the character of the surrounding walls, and indicates that it is a fragment of the ancient pueblo. This projecting buttress answers no purpose whatever in its present position.
It seems impossible to fully recreate the outline of the part of Halona that has been the center for modern Zuñi using only the available data. However, in several areas of the current village, remnants of the old pueblo can still be recognized. If we could access all the inner rooms of the pueblo, some would likely reveal signs of ancient building methods that could at least help reconstruct the general shape of the old pueblo. At the time the village was surveyed, it wasn't feasible to do such an examination. The part of the old pueblo that became the foundation for later buildings is likely found beneath houses Nos. 1 and 4, forming almost a single mass of rooms. Strangers and outsiders aren't allowed into these inner rooms. The outcrops in cluster No. 2 suggest by their position a continuous wall of the old pueblo, probably the outer one. Parts of the ancient outer wall are likely integrated into the west side of cluster No. 1. On the north side of cluster No. 2 (see Pl. LXXVI), there’s a buttress-like projection made of small flat stones that noticeably contrasts with the surrounding walls, indicating that it is a remnant of the ancient pueblo. This projecting buttress serves no real purpose in its current position.
89 The above suggestions are confirmed by another feature in the same house-cluster. On continuing the line of this buttress through the governor’s house we find a projecting fragment of second story wall, the character and finish of which is clearly shown in Pl. LVIII. Its general similarity to ancient masonry and contrast with the present careless methods of construction are very noticeable. The height of this fragment above the ground suggests that the original pueblo was in a very good state of preservation when it was first utilized as a nucleus for later additions. That portion under house No. 1 is probably equally well preserved. The frequent renovation of rooms by the application of a mud coating renders the task of determining the ancient portions of the cluster by the character of the masonry a very difficult one. Ceilings would probably longest retain the original appearance of the ancient rooms as they are not subjected to such renovation.
89 The suggestions mentioned earlier are supported by another feature within the same cluster of houses. Continuing along the line of this support structure through the governor’s house, we discover a protruding piece of the second story wall, which is clearly depicted in Pl. LVIII. Its overall similarity to ancient masonry and stark difference from today’s haphazard building methods are very apparent. The height of this fragment above the ground indicates that the original pueblo was in excellent condition when it was first used as a base for later additions. The area beneath house No. 1 is likely just as well preserved. The frequent renovation of rooms with a mud coating makes it quite challenging to identify the ancient sections of the cluster based on the masonry style. Ceilings would probably maintain the original look of the ancient rooms the longest, as they aren’t subjected to as much renovation.
Plate LVIII. Fragments of Halona wall.
Plate LVIII. Fragments of Halona wall.
Mr. Cushing thought that the outer western wall of the ancient pueblo was curved in outline. It is more probable, however, that it regulated the lines of the present outer rooms, and is reflected in them, as the usual practice of these builders was to put one partition directly over another in adding to the height of a building. This would suggest a nearly rectangular form, perhaps with jogs and offsets, for the old builders could not incorporate a curved outer wall into a mass of rectangular cells, such as that seen in the present pueblo. On the other hand, the outer wall of the original pueblo may have been outside of rooms now occupied, for the village had been abandoned for some time before the colony returned to the site.
Mr. Cushing believed that the outer western wall of the ancient pueblo was curved. However, it's more likely that it aligned with the current outer rooms and is reflected in them, since these builders typically placed one partition directly above another when increasing a building's height. This suggests a nearly rectangular shape, possibly with some jogs and offsets, because the original builders couldn't integrate a curved outer wall into a series of rectangular rooms like those seen in the current pueblo. On the other hand, the outer wall of the original pueblo might have been located outside of the rooms currently in use, as the village had been uninhabited for a while before the colony returned to the site.
Plate LIX. The mesa of Tâaaiyalana, from Zuñi.
Plate LIX. The mesa of Tâaaiyalana, from Zuñi.
TÂAAIYALANA.
On the abandonment of the pueblos known as the Seven Cities of Cibola, supposed to have occurred at the time of the general uprising of the pueblos in 1680, the inhabitants of all the Cibolan villages sought refuge on the summit of Tâaaiyalana, an isolated mesa, 3 miles southeast from Zuñi, and there built a number of pueblo clusters.
On the abandonment of the villages known as the Seven Cities of Cibola, which is believed to have happened during the general uprising of the pueblos in 1680, the residents of all the Cibolan villages sought safety on the top of Tâaaiyalana, an isolated mesa located 3 miles southeast of Zuñi, where they constructed several groups of pueblos.
This mesa, otherwise known as “Thunder Mountain,” rises to the height of 1,000 feet above the plain, and is almost inaccessible. There are two foot trails leading to the summit, each of which in places traverses abrupt slopes of sandstone where holes have been pecked into the rock to furnish foot and hand holds. From the northeast side the summit of the mesa can be reached by a rough and tortuous burro trail. All the rest of the mesa rim is too precipitous to be scaled. Its appearance as seen from Zuñi is shown in Pl. LIX.
This mesa, also called “Thunder Mountain,” rises to a height of 1,000 feet above the plain and is almost impossible to access. There are two footpaths leading to the top, both of which in some spots go over steep sandstone slopes where holes have been pecked into the rock to provide hand and footholds. From the northeast side, the summit can be reached by a rough and winding burro trail. The rest of the mesa's rim is too steep to climb. You can see what it looks like from Zuñi in Pl. LIX.
On the southern portion of this impregnable site and grouped about a point where nearly the whole drainage of the mesa top collects, are found the village remains. The Zuñis stated that the houses were distributed in six groups or clusters, each taking the place of one of the abandoned towns. Mr. Frank H. Cushing 4 was also under the impression 90 that these houses had been built as six distinct clusters of one village, and he has found that at the time of the Pueblo rebellion, but six of the Cibolan villages were occupied. An examination of the plan, however, will at once show that no such definite scheme of arrangement governed the builders. There are but three, or at most four groups that could be defined as distinct clusters, and even in the case of these the disposition is so irregular and their boundaries so ill defined, through the great number of outlying small groups scattered about, that they can hardly be considered distinct. There are really thirty-eight separate buildings (Pl. LX) ranging in size from one of two rooms, near the southern extremity to one of one hundred and three rooms, situated at the southwestern corner of the whole group and close to the western edge of the mesa where the foot trails reach the summit. There is also great diversity in the arrangement of rooms. In some cases the clusters are quite compact, and in others the rooms are distributed in narrow rows. In the large cluster at the northwestern extremity the houses are arranged around a court; with this exception the clusters of rooms are scattered about in an irregular manner, regardless of any defensive arrangement of the buildings. The builders evidently placed the greatest reliance on their impregnable site, and freely adopted such arrangement as convenience dictated.
On the southern part of this secure location, around a spot where nearly all the water from the mesa top collects, you can find the remains of the village. The Zuñis said that the houses were organized into six groups or clusters, each representing one of the abandoned towns. Mr. Frank H. Cushing 4 also believed that these houses were built as six separate clusters of a single village, and he discovered that at the time of the Pueblo rebellion, only six of the Cibolan villages were occupied. However, an examination of the layout shows that no clear plan governed the builders. There are only three, or at most four, groups that can be identified as distinct clusters, and even in those cases, the arrangement is so irregular and their boundaries so poorly defined, due to a large number of smaller groups scattered around, that they can hardly be considered separate. There are actually thirty-eight distinct buildings (Pl. LX) varying in size from one with two rooms near the southern end to one with one hundred and three rooms located at the southwestern corner of the whole cluster, close to the western edge of the mesa where the footpaths lead to the top. There’s also significant variation in how the rooms are arranged. In some cases, the clusters are quite tight, while in others the rooms are laid out in narrow rows. In the large cluster at the northwestern end, the houses are organized around a courtyard; except for this, the clusters of rooms are dispersed in an irregular fashion, without considering any defensive layout of the buildings. The builders clearly relied heavily on their secure location and arranged everything based on convenience.
The outlined area in the lower right was printed as an inset directly below the scale of distance.
The highlighted area in the bottom right was printed as a small box right below the distance scale.
The masonry of these villages was roughly constructed, the walls being often less than a foot thick. Very little adobe mortar seems to have been used; some of the thickest and best preserved walls have apparently been laid nearly dry (Pl. LXI). The few openings still preserved also show evidence of hasty and careless construction. Over most of the area the debris of the fallen walls is very clearly marked, and is but little encumbered with earth or drifted sand. This imparts an odd effect of newness to these ruins, as though the walls had recently fallen. The small amount of debris suggests that the majority of these buildings never were more than one story high, though in four of the broadest clusters (see plan, Pl. LX) a height of two, and possibly three, stories may have been attained. All the ruins are thickly covered by a very luxurious growth of braided cactus, but little of which is found elsewhere in the neighborhood. The extreme southeastern cluster, consisting of four large rooms, differs greatly in character from the rest of the ruins. Here the rooms or inclosures are defined only by a few stones on the surface of the ground and partly embedded in the soil. There is no trace of the debris of fallen walls. These outlined inclosures appear never to have been walled to any considerable height. Within one of the rooms is a slab of stone, about which a few ceremonial plume sticks have been set on end within recent times.
The buildings in these villages were built pretty roughly, with walls often less than a foot thick. It seems very little adobe mortar was used; some of the thickest and best-preserved walls look like they were put up nearly dry (Pl. LXI). The few openings still remaining show signs of hasty and careless construction. For most of the area, the debris from the fallen walls is clearly marked and isn’t buried under much earth or drifted sand. This gives the ruins a strange sense of newness, as if the walls had just recently collapsed. The small amount of debris suggests that most of these buildings were never more than one story high, although in four of the larger clusters (see plan, Pl. LX), there may have been two, possibly three, stories. All the ruins are thickly covered with a lush growth of braided cactus, which isn’t found much elsewhere in the area. The extreme southeastern cluster, made up of four large rooms, looks very different from the rest of the ruins. Here, the rooms or enclosures are defined only by a few stones on the surface of the ground and partly buried in the soil. There’s no sign of fallen wall debris. These outlined enclosures seem to have never been walled to any significant height. Inside one of the rooms is a slab of stone, around which a few ceremonial plume sticks have been recently placed upright.
Plate LXI. Standing walls of Tâaaiyalana ruins.
Plate LXI. Standing walls of the Tâaaiyalana ruins.
The motive that led to the occupation of this mesa was defense; the cause that led to the selection of the particular site was facility for procuring a water supply. The trail on the west side passes a spring half way down the mesa. There was another spring close to the foot 91 trail on the south side; this, however, was lower, being almost at the foot of the talus.
The reason for settling on this mesa was defense, and the key factor in choosing this specific location was ease of accessing a water supply. The path on the west side goes by a spring halfway down the mesa. There was another spring near the bottom of the trail on the south side; however, this one was lower, almost at the base of the slope. 91
In addition to these water sources, the builders collected and stored the drainage of the mesa summit near the southern gap or recess. At this point are still seen the remains of two reservoirs or dams built of heavy masonry. Only a few stones are now in place, but these indicate unusually massive construction. Another reservoir occurs farther along the mesa rim to the southeast, beyond the limits of the plan as given. As may be seen from the plan (Pl. LX) the two reservoirs at the gap are quite close together. These receptacles have been much filled up with sediment. Pl. LXII gives a view of the principal or westernmost reservoir as seen from the northeast. On the left are the large stones once incorporated in the masonry of the dam. This masonry appears to have originally extended around three-fourths of the circumference of the reservoir. As at Ketchipauan, previously described, the upper portion of the basins merged insensibly into the general drainage and had no definite limit.
In addition to these water sources, the builders collected and stored the drainage from the mesa summit near the southern gap or recess. Remains of two reservoirs or dams made of heavy masonry can still be seen at this point. Only a few stones are currently in place, but they indicate unusually massive construction. Another reservoir is located further along the mesa rim to the southeast, beyond the limits of the plan as shown. As seen in the plan (Pl. LX), the two reservoirs at the gap are quite close together. These receptacles have accumulated a lot of sediment. Pl. LXII shows a view of the main or westernmost reservoir from the northeast. On the left are the large stones that were once part of the dam's masonry. This masonry seems to have originally extended around three-quarters of the reservoir's circumference. As at Ketchipauan, previously described, the upper part of the basins blended seamlessly with the general drainage and had no clear boundary.
Plate LXII. Remains of a reservoir on Tâaaiyalana.
Plate LXII. Remains of a reservoir on Tâaaiyalana.
The Zuñi claim to have here practiced a curious method of water storage. They say that whenever there was snow on the ground the villagers would turn out in force and roll up huge snowballs, which were finally collected into these basins, the gradually melting snow furnishing a considerable quantity of water. The desert environment has taught these people to avail themselves of every expedient that could increase their supply of water.
The Zuñi say they used a unique method for storing water. They explain that whenever there was snow on the ground, the villagers would come together and roll large snowballs, which were eventually placed into these basins. As the snow melted, it provided a significant amount of water. Living in a desert has taught these people to make the most of every solution to boost their water supply.
It is proper to state that in the illustrated plan of the Tâaaiyalana ruins the mesa margin was sketched in without the aid of instrumental sights, and hence is not so accurately recorded as the plans and relative positions of the houses. It was all that could be done at the time, and will sufficiently illustrate the general relation of the buildings to the surrounding topography.
It’s important to clarify that in the illustrated plan of the Tâaaiyalana ruins, the mesa edge was drawn without using any instruments, so it’s not recorded as precisely as the plans and locations of the houses. This was the best that could be done at the time and will clearly show the general relationship of the buildings to the surrounding landscape.
Plate LXV. Standing walls of Kin-tiel.
Plate LXV. Standing walls of Kin-tiel.
KIN-TIEL.
All the ruins above described bear close traditional and historic relationship to Zuñi. This is not the case with the splendidly preserved ancient pueblo of Kin-tiel, but the absence of such close historic connection is compensated for by its architectural interest. Differing radically in its general plan from the ruins already examined, it still suggests that some resemblance to the more ancient portions of Nutria and Pescado, as will be seen by comparing the ground plans (Pls. LXVII and LXIX). Its state of preservation is such that it throws light on details which have not survived the general destruction in the other pueblos. These features will be referred to in the discussion and comparison of these architectural groups by constructional details in Chapter IV.
All the ruins mentioned above have a strong traditional and historical connection to Zuñi. This isn’t the case with the beautifully preserved ancient pueblo of Kin-tiel, but the lack of a close historical link is balanced out by its architectural significance. While it differs greatly in overall design from the ruins we've already looked at, it still shows some similarities to the older parts of Nutria and Pescado, as can be seen by comparing the ground plans (Pls. LXVII and LXIX). Its level of preservation is such that it provides insight into details that have been lost due to the widespread destruction in the other pueblos. These features will be discussed in detail when comparing these architectural groups based on construction details in Chapter IV.
This pueblo, located nearly midway between Cibola and Tusayan, is given on some of the maps as Pueblo Grande. It is situated on a small 92 arm of the Pueblo Colorado wash, 22 or 23 miles north of Navajo Springs, and about the same distance south from Pueblo Colorado (Ganado post-office). Geographically the ruins might belong to either Tusayan or Cibola, but Mr. Cushing has collected traditional references among the Zuñi as to the occupation of this pueblo by related peoples at a time not far removed from the first Spanish visit to this region.
This pueblo, located almost halfway between Cibola and Tusayan, is marked on some maps as Pueblo Grande. It sits on a small 92 arm of the Pueblo Colorado wash, about 22 or 23 miles north of Navajo Springs, and roughly the same distance south of Pueblo Colorado (Ganado post-office). Although the ruins could be associated with either Tusayan or Cibola, Mr. Cushing has gathered traditional references from the Zuñi about this pueblo being occupied by related peoples not long before the first Spanish visited this area.
full size
Plate LXIII. Kin-tiel, plan (also showing excavations).
full size
Plate 63. Kin-tiel, map (also displaying excavation sites).
The plan (Pl. LXIII) shows a marked contrast to the irregularity seen in the ruins previously described. The pueblo was clearly defined by a continuous and unbroken outer wall, which probably extended to the full height of the highest stories (Pl. LXIV). This symmetrical form is all the more remarkable in a pueblo of such large dimensions, as, with the exception of Pueblo Bonito of the Chaco group, it is the largest ancient pueblo examined by this Bureau. This village seems to belong to the same type as the Chaco examples, representing the highest development attained in building a large defensive pueblo practically as a single house. All the terraces faced upon one or more inclosed courts, through which access was gained to the rooms. The openings in this outer wall, especially near the ground, were few in number and very small in size, as shown in Pl. CIV. The pueblo was built in two wings of nearly equal size on the opposite slopes of a large sandy wash, traversing its center from east to west. This wash doubtless at one time furnished peculiar facilities for storage of water within or near the village, and this must have been one of the inducements for the selection of the site. At the time of our survey, however, not a drop of water was to be found about the ruin, nor could vestiges of any construction for gathering or storing water be traced. Such vestiges would not be likely to remain, as they must have been washed away by the violent summer torrents or buried under the accumulating sands. Two seasons subsequent to our work at this point it was learned that an American, digging in some rooms on the arroyo margin, discovered the remains of a well or reservoir, which he cleared of sand and debris and found to be in good condition, furnishing so steady a water supply that the discoverer settled on the spot. This was not seen by the writer. There is a small spring, perhaps a mile from the pueblo in a northeasterly direction, but this source would have been wholly insufficient for the needs of so large a village. It may have furnished a much more abundant supply, however, when it was in constant use, for at the time of our visit it seemed to be choked up. About a mile and a half west quite a lagoon forms from the collected drainage of several broad valleys, and contains water for a long time after the cessation of the rains. About 6 miles to the north, in a depression of a broad valley, an extensive lake is situated, and its supply seems to be constant throughout the year, except, perhaps, during an unusually dry season. These various bodies of water were undoubtedly utilized in the horticulture of the occupants of Kin-tiel; in fact, near the borders of the larger lake referred to is a small house of two rooms; much similar in workmanship to the main 93 pueblo, evidently designed as an outlook over fields. This building is illustrated in Pl. LXVI.
The plan (Pl. LXIII) clearly contrasts with the irregularity found in the previously described ruins. The pueblo was defined by a continuous and unbroken outer wall, likely extending to the full height of its tallest stories (Pl. LXIV). This symmetrical shape is even more impressive considering the pueblo’s large size; apart from Pueblo Bonito in the Chaco group, it is the biggest ancient pueblo studied by this Bureau. This village seems to be similar to the Chaco examples, representing the pinnacle of building defensive pueblos as a single structure. All the terraces opened into one or more enclosed courtyards, providing access to the rooms. The openings in the outer wall, especially near the ground, were few and small, as shown in Pl. CIV. The pueblo was built in two nearly equal wings on opposite slopes of a large sandy wash that ran through its center from east to west. This wash must have once provided unique opportunities for storing water near the village, which likely influenced the decision to choose this site. However, during our survey, there was no water to be found around the ruins, nor could we find any traces of construction for collecting or storing water. Such traces probably wouldn’t remain due to being washed away by intense summer storms or buried under accumulating sand. Two seasons after our work there, it was reported that an American, digging in some rooms by the arroyo edge, discovered the remains of a well or reservoir. He cleared it of sand and debris, finding it in good condition and providing a steady water supply, prompting him to settle there. The writer did not see this. There is a small spring about a mile to the northeast of the pueblo, but this source would have been completely inadequate for the needs of such a large village. It may have offered a more abundant supply when it was actively used, as it appeared to be clogged during our visit. About a mile and a half to the west, a lagoon forms from the collected drainage of several wide valleys, holding water long after the rains have stopped. Around 6 miles north, in a low area of a wide valley, there’s a large lake that seems to have a consistent supply of water throughout the year, except possibly during an exceptionally dry season. These various water sources were likely used for agriculture by the occupants of Kin-tiel; in fact, near the edge of the larger lake, there is a small two-room house, quite similar in construction to the main pueblo, clearly designed as a viewpoint over the fields. This building is depicted in Pl. LXVI.
Plate LXIV. North wall of Kin-tiel.
Plate LXIV. North wall of Kin-tiel.
The arrangement of the inner houses differs in the two halves of the ruin. It will be seen that in the north half the general arrangement is roughly parallel with the outer walls, with the exception of a small group near the east end of the arroyo. In the south half, on the other hand, the inner rows are nearly at right angles to the outer room clusters. An examination of the contours of the site will reveal the cause of this difference in the different configuration of the slopes in the two cases. In the south half the rows of rooms have been built on two long projecting ridges, and the diverging small cluster in the north half owes its direction to a similar cause. The line of outer wall being once fixed as a defensive bulwark, there seems to have been but little restriction in the adjustment of the inner buildings to conform to the irregularities of the site. (Pl. LXIII.)
The layout of the inner houses varies in the two halves of the ruin. You'll notice that in the north half, the general layout is mostly parallel to the outer walls, except for a small group near the east end of the arroyo. In the south half, however, the inner rows are almost at right angles to the outer room clusters. Looking at the site's contours will explain this difference due to the varying slopes in each case. In the south half, the rows of rooms were built on two long, projecting ridges, while the small cluster in the north half has a similar reason for its orientation. Once the line of the outer wall was established as a defensive barrier, there seems to have been little limitation on how the inner buildings adjusted to fit the site's irregularities. (Pl. LXIII.)
Only three clearly defined means of access to the interior of the pueblo could be found in the outer walls, and of these only two were suitable for general use. One was at a reentering angle of the outer wall, just south of the east end of the arroyo, where the north wall, continued across the arroyo, overlaps the outer wall of the south half, and the other one was near the rounded northeastern corner of the pueblo. The third opening was a doorway of ordinary size in the thick north wall. It seems probable that other gateways once existed, especially in the south half. From its larger size and more compact arrangement this south half would seem to have greatly needed such facilities, but the preserved walls show no trace of them.
Only three clear ways to get inside the pueblo were found in the outer walls, and out of these, only two were suitable for regular use. One was at a corner of the outer wall, just south of the east end of the arroyo, where the north wall, continuing across the arroyo, overlaps the south half’s outer wall. The other was near the rounded northeastern corner of the pueblo. The third opening was a standard-sized door in the thick north wall. It seems likely that other entrances once existed, especially in the south half. Given its larger size and more compact layout, the south half would have greatly needed such access points, but the remaining walls show no signs of them.
The ground plan furnishes indications, mostly in the north half, of several large rooms of circular form, but broken down remains of square rooms are so much like those of round ones in appearance, owing to the greater amount of débris that collects at the corners, that it could not be definitely determined that the ceremonial rooms here were of the circular form so common in the ancient pueblos. While only circular kivas have been found associated with ancient pueblos of this type, the kivas of all the Cibola ruins above described are said by the Zuñis to have been rectangular. The question can be decided for this pueblo only by excavation on a larger scale than the party was prepared to undertake. Slight excavation at a point where a round room was indicated on the surface, revealed portions of straight walls only.
The ground plan shows signs, mostly in the northern half, of several large circular rooms, but the remains of square rooms look so similar to the round ones because of the larger debris that builds up in the corners, making it hard to determine if the ceremonial rooms here were actually circular like those commonly found in ancient pueblos. While only circular kivas have been discovered with ancient pueblos of this type, the kivas of all the previously mentioned Cibola ruins are claimed by the Zuñis to have been rectangular. This question can only be settled for this pueblo through more extensive excavation than the group was ready to conduct. A small dig at a spot where a round room was indicated on the surface only uncovered parts of straight walls.
Plate LXVI. Kinna-Zinde.
Plate 66. Kinna-Zinde.
The large size of the refuse heap on the south side of the village indicates that the site had been occupied for many generations. Notwithstanding this long period of occupation, no important structure of the village seems to have extended beyond the plan. On the north side, outside the main wall, are seen several rectangles faintly outlined by stones, but these do not appear to have been rooms. They resemble similar inclosures seen in connection with ruined pueblos farther south, which proved on excavation to contain graves.
The large refuse pile on the south side of the village shows that the area has been inhabited for many generations. Despite this long time of occupation, it seems that no significant structure of the village went beyond the initial layout. On the north side, just outside the main wall, there are several rectangles faintly marked by stones, but they don’t seem to have been rooms. They look similar to enclosures found in ruined pueblos further south, which were excavated and revealed to contain graves.
94 The positions of the few excavations made are indicated on the plan (Pl. LXIII). Our facilities for such work were most meager, and whatever results were secured were reached at no great distance from the surface. One of these excavations, illustrated in Pl. C, will be described at greater length in Chapter IV.
PLANS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF INHABITED VILLAGES.
Plate LXVIII. Nutria, view.
Plate 68. Nutria, view.
NUTRIA.
Nutria is the smallest of the three farming pueblos of Zuñi, and is located about 23 miles by trail northeast from Zuñi at the head of Nutria valley. The water supply at this point is abundant, and furnishes a running stream largely utilized in irrigating fields in the vicinity. Most of the village is compactly arranged, as may be seen from the plan (Pl. LXVII and Fig. 17), but a few small clusters, of late construction, containing two or three rooms each, are situated toward the east at quite a distance from the principal group. It is now occupied solely as a farming pueblo during the planting and harvesting season.
Nutria is the smallest of the three farming pueblos of Zuñi, located about 23 miles northeast of Zuñi at the head of Nutria Valley. The water supply here is plentiful and provides a flowing stream that is mainly used for irrigating nearby fields. Most of the village is compactly arranged, as can be seen in the plan (Pl. LXVII and Fig. 17), but there are a few small clusters of more recent construction, each with two or three rooms, located toward the east at a considerable distance from the main group. It is currently used only as a farming pueblo during the planting and harvesting season.
Fig. 17. Nutria, plan; small diagram, old wall.
Fig. 17. Nutria, plan; small diagram, old wall.
The outline of this small pueblo differs greatly from those of most of the Cibolan villages. The village (Pl. LXVIII), particularly in its northernmost cluster, somewhat approximates the form of the ancient pueblo of Kin-tiel (Pl. LXIII), and has apparently been built on the remains of an older village of somewhat corresponding form, as indicated by its curved outer wall. Fragments of carefully constructed masonry of the ancient type, contrasting noticeably with the surrounding modern construction, afford additional evidence of this. The ancient village must have been provided originally with ceremonial rooms or kivas, but no traces of such rooms are now to be found.
The layout of this small pueblo is quite different from most of the Cibolan villages. The village (Pl. LXVIII), especially in its northernmost cluster, somewhat resembles the shape of the ancient pueblo of Kin-tiel (Pl. LXIII) and seems to have been built on the remains of an older village with a similar design, as shown by its curved outer wall. Pieces of well-made masonry from ancient times, clearly standing out from the surrounding modern buildings, provide further evidence of this. The ancient village likely originally had ceremonial rooms or kivas, but there are no signs of such rooms today.
PESCADO.
This village, also a Zuñi farming pueblo, is situated in a large valley about 12 miles northeast from Zuñi. Although it is much larger than Nutria it is wholly comprised within the compact group illustrated. The tendency to build small detached houses noticed at Nutria and at Ojo Caliente has not manifested itself here. The prevalence of abandoned and roofless houses is also noticeable.
This village, which is also a Zuñi farming pueblo, is located in a large valley about 12 miles northeast of Zuñi. While it is much larger than Nutria, it is entirely within the compact group shown. The trend of building small separate houses seen in Nutria and Ojo Caliente hasn't appeared here. It's also noticeable that there are many abandoned and roofless houses.
Fig. 18. Pescado, plan, old wall diagram.
Fig. 18. Fish, plan, old wall diagram.
The outlines of the original court inclosing pueblo (Pl. LXX) are very clearly marked, as the farming Zuñis in their use of this site have scarcely gone outside of the original limits of the ancient pueblo. The plan, Pl. LXIX and Fig. 18, shows a small irregular row built in the large inclosed court; this row, with the inclosures and corrals that surround it, probably formed no part of the original plan. The full curved outline is broken only at the west end of the village by small additions to the outer wall, and the north and east walls also closely follow the boundary of the original pueblo. In fact, at two points along the north wall fragments of carefully executed masonry, probably forming part of the external wall of the ancient pueblo, are still preserved (Pl. LXXII). This outer wall was probably once continuous to the full height of the 96 pueblo, but the partial restorations of the buildings by the Zuñi farmers resemble more closely the modern arrangement. Small rooms have been added to the outside of the cluster and in some cases the terraces are reached by external stone steps, in contrast with the defensive arrangement prevailing generally in pueblos of this form. A number of dome-shaped ovens have been built outside the walls.
The outlines of the original court surrounding the pueblo (Pl. LXX) are clearly defined, as the farming Zuñis have barely gone beyond the original limits of the ancient pueblo. The plan, Pl. LXIX and Fig. 18, shows a small irregular row constructed within the large enclosed court; this row, along with the surrounding enclosures and corrals, likely wasn't part of the original design. The full curved outline is only interrupted at the west end of the village by small additions to the outer wall, and the north and east walls also closely follow the boundary of the original pueblo. In fact, at two points along the north wall, fragments of carefully constructed masonry, likely part of the external wall of the ancient pueblo, are still intact (Pl. LXXII). This outer wall was likely once continuous up to the full height of the pueblo, but the partial restorations made by the Zuñi farmers are more similar to modern layouts. Small rooms have been added to the outside of the cluster, and in some cases, the terraces are accessed by external stone steps, which contrasts with the defensive arrangements typically found in pueblos of this design. Several dome-shaped ovens have been built outside the walls.
Plate LXX. Court view of Pescado, showing corrals.
Plate LXX. Court view of Pescado, showing pens.
Plate LXXI. Pescado houses.
Plate 71. Fish houses.
Plate LXXII. Fragments of ancient masonry in Pescado.
Plate LXXII. Pieces of old stonework in Pescado.
The principle of pueblo plan embodied in Kin-tiel, before referred to, is traceable in this village with particular clearness, distinguishing it from most of the Cibolan pueblos. No traces of kivas were met with in this village.
The principle of pueblo planning seen in Kin-tiel, mentioned earlier, is clearly traceable in this village, setting it apart from most of the Cibolan pueblos. There were no signs of kivas found in this village.
Plate LXXIV. General view of Ojo Caliente.
Plate LXXIV. Overall view of Ojo Caliente.
OJO CALIENTE.
The farming village of Ojo Caliente is located near the dry wash of the Zuñi River, and is about 15 miles distant from Zuñi, in a southerly direction. It is about midway between Hawikuh and Ketchipauan, two of the seven cities of Cibola above described. Though situated in fertile and well watered country and close to the remains of the ancient villages, it bears indications of having been built in comparatively recent times. There are no such evidences of connection with an older village as were found at Nutria and Pescado. The irregular and small clusters that form this village are widely scattered over a rather rough and broken site, as shown on the plan (Pl. LXXIII). Here again a large portion of the village is untenanted. The large cluster toward the eastern extremity of the group, and the adjoining houses situated on the low, level ground, compose the present inhabited village. The houses occupying the elevated rocky sites to the west (Pl. LXXIV) are in an advanced stage of decay, and have been for a long time abandoned.
The farming village of Ojo Caliente is located near the dry wash of the Zuñi River, about 15 miles south of Zuñi. It’s roughly halfway between Hawikuh and Ketchipauan, two of the seven cities of Cibola mentioned earlier. Although it’s in a fertile and well-watered area and close to the remains of ancient villages, it shows signs of being built relatively recently. There aren't any indications of connections to an older village like those found at Nutria and Pescado. The irregular and small clusters that make up this village are spread out over a rough, uneven site, as shown in the plan (Pl. LXXIII). Again, a large part of the village is unoccupied. The large cluster towards the eastern end of the group, along with the nearby houses on the flat ground, make up the currently inhabited village. The houses on the elevated rocky sites to the west (Pl. 74) are in a state of decline and have been abandoned for a long time.
This southern portion of the Cibola district seems to have been much exposed to the inroads of the Apache. One of the effects of this has already been noticed in the defensive arrangement in the Ketchipauan church. On account of such danger, the Zuñi were likely to have built the first house-clusters here on the highest points of the rocky promontory, notwithstanding the comparative inconvenience of such sites. Later, as the farmers gained confidence or as times became safer, they built houses down on the flat now occupied; but this apparently was not done all at once. The distribution of the houses over sites of varying degrees of inaccessibility, suggests a succession of approaches to the occupation of the open and unprotected valley.
This southern part of the Cibola area appears to have been heavily impacted by the Apache invasions. One effect of this is evident in the defensive setup of the Ketchipauan church. Because of the danger, the Zuñi probably built the first clusters of houses on the highest points of the rocky promontory, even though those locations were relatively inconvenient. Later on, as the farmers became more confident or as conditions improved, they constructed houses down in the flat area that is now occupied. However, this process didn’t happen all at once. The way the houses are spread out over different levels of accessibility suggests a gradual approach to settling the open and vulnerable valley.
Some of the masonry of this village is carelessly constructed, and, as in the other farming pueblos, there is much less adobe plastering and smoothing of outer walls than in the home pueblo.
Some of the masonry in this village is poorly built, and, like in the other farming pueblos, there is far less adobe plastering and finishing of outer walls compared to the home pueblo.
Plate LXXV. House at Ojo Caliente.
Plate LXXV. House at Ojo Caliente.
At the time of the survey the occupation of this village throughout the year was proposed by several families, who wished to resort to the parent village only at stated ceremonials and important festivals. The comparative security of recent times is thus tending to the disintegration of the huge central pueblo. This result must be inevitable, as the 97 dying out of the defensive motive brings about a realization of the great inconvenience of the present centralized system.
At the time of the survey, several families proposed that the village be occupied year-round, preferring to return to the main village only for certain ceremonies and major festivals. The increased security in recent times is leading to the breakdown of the large central pueblo. This outcome seems unavoidable, as the decline of the need for defense makes the current centralized system feel increasingly inconvenient. 97
Plate LXXVIII. General inside view of Zuñi, looking west.
Plate LXXVIII. Overall interior view of Zuñi, facing west.
ZUÑI.
The pueblo of Zuñi is built upon a small knoll on the north bank of the Zuñi River, about three miles west of the conspicuous mesa of Tâaaiyalana. It is the successor of all the original “Seven Cities of Cibola” of the Spaniards, and is the largest of the modern pueblos. As before stated, the remains of Halona, one of the “seven cities,” as identified by Mr. Cushing, have served as a nucleus for the construction of the modern pueblo, and have been incorporated into the most densely clustered portions, represented on the plan (Pl. LXXVI) by numbers 1 and 4.
The Zuñi pueblo is situated on a small hill on the north bank of the Zuñi River, about three miles west of the prominent mesa of Tâaaiyalana. It is the descendant of the original "Seven Cities of Cibola" noted by the Spaniards and is the largest of the current pueblos. As mentioned earlier, the remnants of Halona, one of the "seven cities" identified by Mr. Cushing, have been used as a foundation for building the modern pueblo and are included in the most densely populated areas, represented on the plan (Pl. LXXVI) by numbers 1 and 4.
Key to Zuñi plan (Plate LXXVI).
Key to Zuñi plan (Plate LXXVI).
Some of the Cibolan villages were valley pueblos, built at a distance from the rocky mesas and canyons that must have served as quarries for the stone used in building. The Halona site was of this type, the nearest supply of stone being 3 miles distant. At this point (Halona) the Zuñi River is perennial, and furnishes a plentiful supply of water at all seasons of the year. It disappears, however, a few miles west in a broad, sandy wash, to appear again 20 miles below the village, probably through the accession of small streams from springs farther down. The so-called river furnishes the sole water supply at Zuñi, with the exception of a single well or reservoir on the north side of the village.
Some of the Cibolan villages were valley pueblos, built away from the rocky mesas and canyons that likely served as quarries for the stone used in construction. The Halona site was one of these, with the nearest stone supply being 3 miles away. At Halona, the Zuñi River flows year-round, providing a steady water supply throughout the year. However, it disappears a few miles to the west in a wide, sandy wash, only to reappear 20 miles downstream, likely fed by small streams from springs further down. This so-called river is the only source of water for Zuñi, except for one well or reservoir located on the north side of the village.
Zuñi has been built at a point having no special advantages for defense; convenience to large areas of tillable soil has apparently led to the selection of the site. This has subjected it in part to the same influences that had at an earlier date produced the carefully walled fortress pueblos of the valleys, where the defensive efficiency was due to well planned and constructed buildings. The result is that Zuñi, while not comparable in symmetry to many of the ancient examples, displays a remarkably compact arrangement of dwellings in the portions of the pueblos first occupied, designated on the plan (Pl. LXXVI) as houses 1 and 4. Owing to this restriction of lateral expansion this portion of the pueblo has been carried to a great height.
Zuñi was built in a location that doesn’t offer any particular defense advantages; it seems that the choice of site was influenced by the availability of large areas of arable land. This has made it somewhat vulnerable to the same factors that earlier led to the development of well-fortified pueblos in the valleys, where the effectiveness of the defenses came from thoughtfully designed and constructed buildings. As a result, Zuñi, while not as symmetrical as many ancient examples, features an impressively compact arrangement of homes in the areas of the pueblo that were occupied first, identified on the plan (Pl. LXXVI) as houses 1 and 4. Due to this limitation on horizontal expansion, this section of the pueblo has been built up to a significant height.
Plate LXXVII. Outline plan of Zuñi, showing distribution of oblique openings.
Plate LXXVII. Outline plan of Zuñi, showing the layout of angled openings.
Pl. LXXVIII gives a general view of these higher terraces of the village from the southeast. A height of five distinct terraces from the ground is attained on the south side of this cluster. The same point, however, owing to the irregularity of the site, is only three terraces above the ground on the north side. The summit of the knoll upon which the older portion of Zuñi has been built is so uneven, and the houses themselves vary so much in dimensions, that the greatest disparity prevails in the height of terraces. A three-terrace portion of a cluster may have but two terraces immediately alongside, and throughout the more closely built portions of the village the exposed height of terraces varies from 1 foot to 8 or 10 feet. Pl. LXXIX illustrates this feature.
Pl. LXXVIII provides an overview of the higher terraces of the village from the southeast. On the south side of this cluster, there are five distinct terraces rising from the ground. However, due to the irregular layout, the same point is only three terraces above ground on the north side. The peak of the knoll where the older part of Zuñi is situated is quite uneven, and the houses themselves differ significantly in size, leading to a wide range in the height of the terraces. A section with three terraces in a cluster might only have two terraces right next to it, and in the more densely built areas of the village, the exposed height of the terraces ranges from 1 foot to 8 or 10 feet. Pl. LXXIX illustrates this feature.
Plate LXXIX. Zuñi terraces.
Plate 79. Zuñi terraces.
The growth of the village has apparently been far beyond the original expectation of the builders, and the crowded additions seem to have 98 been joined to the clusters wherever the demand for more space was most urgent, without following any definite plan in their arrangement. In such of the ancient pueblo ruins as afford evidence of having passed through a similar experience, the crowding of additional cells seems to have been made to conform to some extent to a predetermined plan. At Kin-tiel we have seen how such additions to the number of habitable rooms could readily be made within the open court without affecting the symmetry and defensive efficiency of the pueblo; but here the nucleus of the large clusters was small and compact, so that enlargement has taken place only by the addition of rooms on the outside, both on the ground and on upper terraces.
The village has clearly grown much more than the builders originally expected, and the crowded extensions appear to have been added wherever the need for more space was greatest, without any specific plan for their layout. In some of the ancient pueblo ruins that show similar growth patterns, the addition of new rooms seems to have somewhat followed a pre-established design. In Kin-tiel, we saw how extra habitable rooms could easily be added within the open courtyard without disrupting the symmetry and defensive capability of the pueblo; however, here the core of the larger clusters was small and compact, so the expansion has occurred mainly through adding rooms on the exterior, both on the ground level and on the upper terraces. 98
Plate LXXX. Old adobe church of Zuñi.
Plate LXXX. Old adobe church of Zuñi.
The highest point of Zuñi, now showing five terraces, is said to have had a height of seven terraces as late as the middle of the present century, but at the time of the survey of the village no traces were seen of such additional stories. The top of the present fifth terrace, however, is more than 50 feet long, and affords sufficient space for the addition of a sixth and seventh story.
The highest point of Zuñi, now with five terraces, is said to have had a height of seven terraces as recently as the middle of this century, but during the survey of the village, no signs of those extra stories were found. The top of the current fifth terrace, however, is over 50 feet long and provides enough space for adding a sixth and seventh story.
The court or plaza in which the church (Pl. LXXX) stands is so much larger than such inclosures usually are when incorporated in a pueblo plan that it seems unlikely to have formed part of the original village. It probably resulted from locating the church prior to the construction of the eastern rows of the village. Certain features in the houses themselves indicate the later date of these rows.
The square or plaza where the church (Pl. LXXX) is located is much larger than what you'd typically find in a pueblo layout, making it seem unlikely to have been part of the original village. It probably came about because the church was positioned before the eastern sections of the village were built. Some characteristics of the houses themselves suggest that these sections were constructed later.
Plate LXXXI. Eastern rows of Zuñi.
Plate LXXXI. Eastern rows of Zuni.
The arrangement of dwellings about a court (Pl. LXXXII), characteristic of the ancient pueblos, is likely to have prevailed in the small pueblo of Halona, about which clustered the many irregular houses that constitute modern Zuñi. Occasional traces of such an arrangement are still met with in portions of Zuñi, although nearly all of the ancient pueblo has been covered with rooms of later date. In the arrangement of Zuñi houses a noticeable difference in the manner of clustering is found in different parts of the pueblo. That portion designated as house No. 1 on the plan, built over the remains of the original small pueblo, is unquestionably the oldest portion of the village. The clustering seems to have gone on around this center to an extraordinary and exceptional extent before any houses were built in other portions. House No. 4 is a portion of the same structure, for although a street or passageway intervenes it is covered with two or three terraces, indicating that such connection was established at an early date. The rows on the lower ground to the east (Pl. LXXXI), where the rooms are not so densely clustered, were built after the removal of the defensive motive that influenced the construction of the central pile. These portions, arranged approximately in rows, show a marked resemblance to pueblos of known recent date. That they were built subsequently to the main clusters is also indicated by the abundant use of oblique openings and roof holes, where there is very little necessity for such contrivances. This feature was originally devised to meet the exceptional conditions of lighting 99 imposed by dense crowding of the living rooms. It will be referred to again in examining the details of openings, and its wide departure from the arrangement found to prevail generally in pueblo constructions will there be noted. The habit of making such provisions for lighting inner rooms became fixed and was applied generally to many clusters much smaller in size than those of other pueblos where this feature was not developed and where the necessity for it was not felt. These less crowded rooms of more recent construction form the eastern portion of the pueblo, and also include the governor’s house on the south side.
The layout of homes around a courtyard (Pl. L82), which is typical of ancient pueblos, likely existed in the small pueblo of Halona, where many irregular houses make up modern Zuñi. Some signs of this layout can still be found in parts of Zuñi, although most of the ancient pueblo has been replaced with newer rooms. In the arrangement of Zuñi houses, there’s a noticeable difference in how they cluster in various areas of the pueblo. The area marked as house No. 1 on the plan, built over the remnants of the original small pueblo, is definitely the oldest part of the village. The clustering seems to have developed around this center to an exceptional degree before any houses were constructed in other areas. House No. 4 is part of the same structure; even though a street or passageway separates them, it has two or three terraces on top, suggesting that this connection was made early on. The rows in the lower ground to the east (Pl. LXXXI), where the rooms aren't as tightly packed, were built after the defensive reasons for building the central cluster were no longer relevant. These sections, arranged roughly in rows, closely resemble pueblos of known recent dates. It’s clear that they were built after the main clusters because of the frequent use of angled openings and roof holes, which aren’t really necessary. This feature was originally created to deal with the unique lighting challenges caused by the close arrangement of living spaces. It will be mentioned again when looking at the specifics of the openings, and its significant difference from the usual pueblo construction will be noted there. The practice of creating such solutions for lighting inner rooms became standard and was commonly applied to many smaller clusters than those of other pueblos where this feature wasn’t developed and where it wasn't needed. These less crowded, more recent rooms make up the eastern part of the pueblo, including the governor’s house on the south side.
Plate LXXXII. A Zuñi court.
Plate 82. A Zuñi court.
The old ceremonial rooms or kivas, and the rooms for the meeting of the various orders or secret societies were, during the Spanish occupancy, crowded into the innermost recesses of this ancient portion of Zuñi under house No. 1. But the kivas, in all likelihood, occupied a more marginal position before such foreign influence was brought to bear on them, as do some of the kivas at the present time, and as is the general practice in other modern pueblos.
The old ceremonial rooms, or kivas, along with the spaces for meetings of different orders or secret societies, were packed into the deepest parts of the ancient area of Zuñi under house No. 1 during the Spanish occupation. However, it's likely that the kivas had a more peripheral role before outside influences affected them, similar to some kivas today and the usual practices in other modern pueblos.
Plate LXXXIII. A Zuñi small house.
Plate LXXXIII. A small Zuñi house.
CHAPTER IV.
ARCHITECTURE OF TUSAYAN AND CIBOLA COMPARED BY CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS.
INTRODUCTION.
In the two preceding chapters the more general features of form and distribution in the ruined and inhabited pueblos of Tusayan and Cibola have been described. In order to gain a full and definite idea of the architectural acquirements of the pueblo builders it will be necessary to examine closely the constructional details of their present houses, endeavoring, when practicable, to compare these details with the rather meager vestiges of similar features that have survived the destruction of the older villages, noting the extent to which these have departed from early types, and, where practicable, tracing the causes of such deviation. For convenience of comparison the various details of housebuilding for the two groups will be treated together.
In the previous two chapters, we looked at the general features of form and distribution in the abandoned and occupied pueblos of Tusayan and Cibola. To fully understand the architectural skills of the pueblo builders, we need to closely examine the construction details of their current homes, trying, when possible, to compare these details with the limited remains of similar features that have survived the destruction of the older villages. We will note how much these have changed from early styles and, where possible, identify the reasons for these changes. For easier comparison, we will discuss the different aspects of house building for both groups together.
The writer is indebted to Mr. A. M. Stephen, the collector of the traditionary data already given, for information concerning the rites connected with house building at Tusayan incorporated in the following pages, and also for the carefully collected and valuable nomenclature of architectural details appended hereto. Material of this class pertaining to the Cibola group of pueblos unfortunately could not be procured.
The writer is grateful to Mr. A. M. Stephen, the collector of the traditional data provided earlier, for the information about the rituals related to house building at Tusayan included in the following pages, as well as for the carefully gathered and valuable terminology of architectural details attached here. Unfortunately, material of this kind related to the Cibola group of pueblos could not be obtained.
HOUSE BUILDING.
RITES AND METHODS.
The ceremonials connected with house building in Tusayan are quite meager, but the various steps in the ritual, described in their proper connection in the following paragraphs, are well defined and definitely assigned to those who participate in the construction of the buildings.
The ceremonies related to house building in Tusayan are pretty limited, but the different steps in the ritual, explained in the following paragraphs, are clearly defined and specifically assigned to those involved in the construction of the buildings.
So far as could be ascertained there is no prearranged plan for an entire house of several stories, or for the arrangement of contiguous houses. Most of the ruins examined emphasize this absence of a clearly defined general plan governing the location of rooms added to the original cluster. Two notable exceptions to this want of definite plan occur among the ruins described. In Tusayan the Fire House (Fig. 7) is evidently the result of a clearly defined purpose to give a definite form to the entire cluster, just as, on a very much larger scale, does the ruin of Kin-tiel, belonging to the Cibola group (Pl. LXIII). In both these cases the fixing of the outer wall on a definite line seems to have 101 been regarded as of more importance than the specific locations of individual rooms or dwellings within this outline. Throughout that part of Tusayan which has been examined, however, the single room seems now to be regarded as the pueblo unit, and is spoken of as a complete house. It is the construction of such a house unit that is here to be described.
As far as we can tell, there isn’t a specific plan for entire multi-story houses or for the layout of neighboring houses. Most of the ruins we looked at highlight this lack of a clear overall plan for the arrangement of rooms added to the original group. However, there are two notable exceptions to this absence of a definite plan among the ruins we described. In Tusayan, the Fire House (Fig. 7) clearly shows an intent to give a specific shape to the entire group, just as the ruin of Kin-tiel, which belongs to the Cibola group (Pl. LXIII), does on a much larger scale. In both cases, the alignment of the outer wall along a specific line seems to have been considered more important than the exact placements of individual rooms or homes within that outline. However, throughout the examined area of Tusayan, the single room seems to be seen as the basic unit of the pueblo and is referred to as a complete house. This text will describe the construction of such a house unit.
A suitable site having been selected, the builder considers what the dimensions of the house should be, and these he measures by paces, placing a stone or other mark at each corner. He then goes to the woods and cuts a sufficient number of timbers for the roof of a length corresponding to the width of his house. Stones are also gathered and roughly dressed, and in all these operations he is assisted by his friends, usually of his own gens. These assistants receive no compensation except their food, but that of itself entails considerable expense on the builder, and causes him to build his house with as few helpers as possible.
Once a suitable location is chosen, the builder decides on the dimensions of the house and measures them by taking steps, marking each corner with a stone or another marker. He then heads to the woods to cut enough timber for the roof, making sure it matches the width of his house. He also collects stones and shapes them roughly. Throughout these tasks, he is helped by his friends, usually from his own group. These friends don’t get paid, except for their meals, which adds significant costs for the builder and leads him to build his house with as few helpers as possible.
The material having been accumulated, the builder goes to the village chief, who prepares for him four small eagle feathers. The chief ties a short cotton string to the stem of each, sprinkles them with votive meal, and breathes upon them his prayers for the welfare of the proposed house and its occupants. These feathers are called Nakwa kwoci, a term meaning a breathed prayer, and the prayers are addressed to Másauwu, the Sun, and to other deities concerned in house-life. These feathers are placed at the four corners of the house and a large stone is laid over each of them. The builder then decides where the door is to be located, and marks the place by setting some food on each side of it; he then passes around the site from right to left, sprinkling piki crumbs and other particles of food, mixed with native tobacco, along the lines to be occupied by the walls. As he sprinkles this offering he sings to the Sun his Kitdauwi, house song: “Si-ai, a-hai, si-ai, a-hai.” The meaning of these words the people have now forgotten.
Once the materials are gathered, the builder goes to the village chief, who prepares four small eagle feathers for him. The chief ties a short cotton string to the stem of each feather, sprinkles them with ceremonial meal, and breathes his prayers for the well-being of the future house and its residents onto them. These feathers are called Nakwa kwoci, which means a breathed prayer, and the prayers are directed to Másauwu, the Sun, and other deities relevant to household life. The feathers are placed at the four corners of the house, with a large stone laid over each one. The builder then determines where the door will be and marks the spot by placing food on either side of it. Next, he walks around the site from right to left, sprinkling piki crumbs and other food particles mixed with native tobacco along the lines where the walls will be erected. While he sprinkles this offering, he sings to the Sun his house song, the Kitdauwi: “Si-ai, a-hai, si-ai, a-hai.” The meaning of these words has since been forgotten by the people.
Mr. Stephen has been informed by the Indians that the man is a mason and the woman the plasterer, the house belonging to the woman when finished; but according to my own observation this is not the universal practice in modern Tusayan. In the case of the house in Oraibi, illustrated in Pl. XL from a photograph, much, if not all, of the masonry was laid, as well as finished and plastered, by the woman of the house and her female relatives. There was but one man present at this house-building, whose grudgingly performed duty consisted of lifting the larger roof beams and lintels into place and of giving occasional assistance in the heavier work. The ground about this house was strewn with quantities of broken stone for masonry, which seemed to be all prepared and brought to the spot before building began; but often the various divisions of the work are carried on by both men and women simultaneously. While the men were dressing the stones, the women brought earth and water and mixed a mud plaster. Then the walls were laid in irregular courses, using the mortar very sparingly.
Mr. Stephen was told by the Indigenous people that the man is a mason and the woman the plasterer, with the house belonging to the woman when it’s finished; however, based on my own observations, this isn’t the standard practice in modern Tusayan. In the case of the house in Oraibi, shown in Pl. XL from a photograph, much, if not all, of the masonry was done, as well as finished and plastered, by the woman of the house and her female relatives. Only one man was present during the building, and his begrudging role was lifting the larger roof beams and lintels into place, along with offering occasional help with the heavier tasks. The ground around this house was covered in lots of broken stone for masonry, which seemed to have been prepared and brought in before construction started; however, often both men and women work on different parts simultaneously. While the men were shaping the stones, the women gathered earth and water to mix a mud plaster. Then the walls were built in uneven courses, using the mortar very sparingly.
Pine, piñon, juniper, cottonwood, willow, and indeed all the available trees of the region are used in house construction. The main beams for the roof are usually of pine or cottonwood, from which the bark has been stripped. The roof is always made nearly level, and the ends of the beams are placed across the side walls at intervals of about 2 feet. Above these are laid smaller poles parallel with the side walls, and not more than a foot apart. Across these again are laid reeds or small willows, as close together as they can be placed, and above this series is crossed a layer of grass or small twigs and weeds. Over this framework a layer of mud is spread, which, after drying, is covered with earth and firmly trodden down. The making of the roof is the work of the women. When it is finished the women proceed to spread a thick coating of mud for a floor. After this follows the application of plaster to the walls. Formerly a custom prevailed of leaving a small space on the wall unplastered, a belief then existing that a certain Katchina came and finished it, and although the space remained bare it was considered to be covered with an invisible plaster.
Pine, piñon, juniper, cottonwood, willow, and really all the trees available in the area are used to build houses. The main beams for the roof are usually made from pine or cottonwood, with the bark stripped off. The roof is always built to be almost flat, and the ends of the beams rest on the side walls about every 2 feet. On top of these beams, smaller poles are laid parallel to the side walls, spaced no more than a foot apart. Then, reeds or small willows are placed across these, packed closely together, and over this layer goes a mix of grass, small twigs, and weeds. A layer of mud is spread over this framework, which, after drying, is topped with dirt and firmly packed down. The women handle the roofing. Once it's done, the women spread a thick layer of mud to create a floor. After that, they apply plaster to the walls. In the past, it was common to leave a small patch of the wall unplastered, based on a belief that a certain Katchina would come and finish it. Even though the area remained bare, it was thought to be covered with an invisible plaster.
The house being thus far completed, the builder prepares four feathers similar to those prepared by the chief, and ties them to a short piece of willow, the end of which is inserted over one of the central roof beams. These feathers are renewed every year at the feast of Soyalyina, celebrated in December, when the sun begins to return north ward. The builder also makes an offering to Másauwu (called “feeding the house”) by placing fragments of food among the rafters, beseeching him not to hasten the departure of any of the family to the under world.
The house being mostly finished, the builder prepares four feathers like those made by the chief and ties them to a short piece of willow, the end of which is placed over one of the central roof beams. These feathers are replaced every year at the Soyalyina feast, celebrated in December, when the sun starts moving back north. The builder also makes an offering to Másauwu (known as “feeding the house”) by putting bits of food among the rafters, asking him not to rush the departure of any family member to the underworld.
A hole is left in one corner of the roof, and under this the woman builds a fireplace and chimney. The former is usually but a small cavity about a foot square in the corner of the floor. Over this a chimney hood is constructed, its lower rim being about 3 feet above the floor.
A hole is left in one corner of the roof, and under this, the woman builds a fireplace and chimney. The fireplace is usually just a small space about a foot square in the corner of the floor. Above this, a chimney hood is built, with its lower edge about 3 feet above the floor.
As a rule the house has no eaves, the roof being finished with a stone coping laid flush with the wall and standing a few inches higher than the roof to preserve the earth covering from being blown or washed away. Roof-drains of various materials are also commonly inserted in the copings, as will be described later.
As a rule, the house has no eaves. The roof is topped with a stone coping that sits flush with the wall and rises a few inches higher than the roof to prevent the earth covering from being blown or washed away. Roof drains made from different materials are also often placed in the copings, as will be explained later.
All the natives, as far as could be ascertained, regard this single-roomed house as being complete in itself, but they also consider it the nucleus of the larger structure. When more space is desired, as when the daughters of the house marry and require room for themselves, another house is built in front of and adjoining the first one, and a second story is often added to the original house. The same ceremony is observed in building the ground story in front, but there is no ceremony for the second and additional stories.
All the locals, as far as we can tell, view this single-room house as a complete unit, but they also see it as the center of a larger building. When more space is needed, like when the daughters of the house get married and need their own rooms, another house is constructed in front of and attached to the first one, and a second story is often added to the original house. The same ceremony is performed for building the ground floor in front, but there’s no ceremony for the second and additional stories.
103 Anawita (war-chief of Sichumovi) describes the house in Walpi in which he was born as having had five rooms on the ground floor, and as being four stories high, but it was terraced both in front and rear, his sisters and their families occupying the rear portion. The fourth story consisted of a single room and had terraces on two opposite sides. This old house is now very dilapidated, and the greater portion of the walls have been carried away. There is no prescribed position for communicating doorways, but the outer doors are usually placed in the lee walls to avoid the prevailing southwest winds.
103 Anawita (war chief of Sichumovi) describes the house in Walpi where he was born as having five rooms on the ground floor and being four stories high, but it was terraced in both the front and back, with his sisters and their families living in the back part. The fourth story had a single room and terraces on two opposite sides. This old house is now in bad shape, and most of the walls have crumbled away. There isn’t a specific place for doorways, but the outer doors are usually positioned in the sheltered walls to block the strong southwest winds.
![]() |
Fig. 19. A Tusayan wood rack. |
Formerly on the approach of cold weather, and to some extent the custom still exists, people withdrew from the upper stories to the kikoli rooms, where they huddled together to keep warm. Economy in the consumption of fuel also prompted this expedient; but these ground-floor rooms forming the first terrace, as a rule having no external doorways, and entered from without by means of a roof hatchway provided with a ladder, are ordinarily used only for purposes of storage. Even their roofs are largely utilized for the temporary storage of many household articles, and in the autumn, after the harvests have been gathered, the terraces and copings are often covered with drying peaches, and the peculiar long strips into which pumpkins and squashes have been cut to facilitate their desiccation for winter use. Among other things the household supply of wood is sometimes piled up at one end of this terrace, but more commonly the natives have so many other uses for this space that the sticks of fuel are piled up on a rude projecting skeleton of poles, supported on one side by two upright forked sticks set into the ground, and on the other resting upon the stone coping of the wall, as illustrated in Fig. 19. At other times poles are laid across a re-entering angle of a house and used as a wood rack, without any support from the ground. At the autumn season not only is the available space of the first terrace fully utilized, but every projecting beam or stick is covered with strings of drying meat or squashes, and many long poles are extended between convenient points to do temporary 104 duty as additional drying racks. There was in all cases at least one fireplace on the inside in the upper stories, but the cooking was done on the terraces, usually at the end of the first or kikoli roof. This is still a general custom, and the end of the first terrace is usually walled up and roofed, and is called tupubi. Tuma is the name of the flat baking-stone used in the houses, but the flat stone used for baking at the kisi in the field is called tupubi.
In the past, as cold weather approached, and to some extent this tradition still exists, people moved from the upper floors to the kikoli rooms, where they gathered together to stay warm. The need to save on fuel also led to this practice; however, these ground-floor rooms, which make up the first terrace and typically lack outside doors, are usually accessed by a roof hatch with a ladder and are mainly used for storage. Even their roofs are often used for temporarily storing various household items, and in the autumn, after the harvest is done, the terraces and ledges are frequently filled with drying peaches and the long strips from pumpkins and squashes that have been cut to help them dry for winter use. Sometimes the household wood supply is stacked at one end of this terrace, but more often, locals have so many other uses for the space that the fuel sticks are propped up on a rough framework of poles, with one end supported by two forked sticks set into the ground, and the other resting on the stone ledge of the wall, as shown in Fig. 19. Other times, poles are placed across the re-entrant angle of a house and serve as a wood rack, without any ground support. During autumn, not only is the available space on the first terrace fully used, but every beam or stick is also filled with strings of drying meat or squashes, and many long poles are extended between convenient points to serve as additional drying racks. There is usually at least one fireplace inside the upper stories, but cooking is done on the terraces, generally at the end of the first or kikoli roof. This is still a common practice, and the end of the first terrace is usually enclosed and roofed, referred to as tupubi. Tuma is the name of the flat baking stone used in homes, while the flat stone used for baking at the kisi in the fields is called tupubi.
Kikoli is the name of the ground story of the house, which has no opening in the outer wall.
Kikoli refers to the ground floor of the house, which has no openings in the outer wall.
The term for the terraced roofs is ihpobi, and is applied to all of them; but the tupatca ihpobi, or third terrace, is the place of general resort, and is regarded as a common loitering place, no one claiming distinct ownership. This is suggestive of an early communal dwelling, but nothing definite can now be ascertained on this point. In this connection it may also be noted that the eldest sister’s house is regarded as their home by her younger brothers and her nieces and nephews.
The word for the terraced roofs is ihpobi, and it's used for all of them; however, the tupatca ihpobi, or third terrace, is the main hangout and is seen as a shared gathering spot, with no one claiming specific ownership. This hints at an early communal living situation, but nothing concrete can be determined about this now. In this context, it's also worth mentioning that the oldest sister’s house is considered their home by her younger brothers and her nieces and nephews.
Aside from the tupubi, there are numerous small rooms especially constructed for baking the thin, paper-like bread called piki. These are usually not more than from 5 to 7 feet high, with interior dimensions not larger than 7 feet by 10, and they are called tumcokobi, the place of the flat stone, tuma being the name of the stone itself, and tcok describing its flat position. Many of the ground-floor rooms in the dwelling houses are also devoted to this use.
Aside from the tupubi, there are many small rooms specifically built for baking the thin, paper-like bread known as piki. These rooms typically range from 5 to 7 feet high, with interior dimensions no larger than 7 feet by 10, and they are called tumcokobi, which means the place of the flat stone, with tuma referring to the stone itself and tcok indicating its flat position. Many of the ground-floor rooms in the houses are also used for this purpose.
The terms above are those more commonly used in referring to the houses and their leading features. A more exhaustive vocabulary of architectural terms, comprising those especially applied to the various constructional features of the kivas or ceremonial rooms, and to the “kisis,” or temporary brush shelters for field use, will be found near the end of this paper.
The terms above are those most commonly used to describe the houses and their main features. A more detailed vocabulary of architectural terms, including those specifically related to the different construction features of the kivas or ceremonial rooms, and to the “kisis,” or temporary brush shelters for field use, will be found near the end of this paper.
The only trace of a traditional village plan, or arrangement of contiguous houses, is found in a meager mention in some of the traditions, that rows of houses were built to inclose the kiva, and to form an appropriate place for the public dances and processions of masked dancers. No definite ground plan, however, is ascribed to these traditional court-inclosing houses, although at one period in the evolution of this defensive type of architecture they must have partaken somewhat of the symmetrical grouping found on the Rio Chaco and elsewhere.
The only evidence of a traditional village layout, or a setup of connected houses, is a brief reference in some traditions, stating that rows of houses were built to enclose the kiva and create a suitable space for public dances and masked dancer processions. However, no specific ground plan is associated with these traditional courtyard-enclosing houses, even though at one point in the development of this defensive architectural style, they likely had some elements of the symmetrical arrangement seen in the Rio Chaco and other locations.
LOCALIZATION OF GENTES.
In the older and more symmetrical examples there was doubtless some effort to distribute the various gentes, or at least the phratries, in definite quarters of the village, as stated traditionally. At the present day, however, there is but little trace of such localization. In the case of Oraibi, the largest of the Tusayan villages, Mr. Stephen has with great care and patience ascertained the distribution of the various gentes in the village, as recorded on the accompanying skeleton plan 105 (Pl. XXXVII). An examination of the diagram in connection with the appended list of the families occupying Oraibi will at once show that, however clearly defined may have been the quarters of various gentes in the traditional village, the greatest confusion prevails at the present time. The families numerically most important, such as the Reed, Coyote, Lizard, and Badger, are represented in all of the larger house clusters.
In the older and more organized examples, there was definitely some effort to assign different clans, or at least the phratries, to specific areas of the village, as was traditionally stated. Nowadays, however, there’s barely any sign of such organization. In the case of Oraibi, the largest of the Tusayan villages, Mr. Stephen has carefully and patiently determined how the various clans are distributed in the village, as shown on the accompanying skeleton plan 105 (Pl. XXXVII). Looking at the diagram along with the list of families living in Oraibi makes it clear that, no matter how clearly defined the quarters of different clans were in the traditional village, there’s a lot of confusion today. The families with the largest numbers, such as the Reed, Coyote, Lizard, and Badger, can be found in all of the larger house clusters.
Families occupying Oraibi.
Reed families | 25 | Corn families | 9 | |
Coyote families | 17 | Sun families | 9 | |
Lizard families | 14 | Sand families | 8 | |
Badger families | 13 | Eagle families | 6 | |
Rabbit families | 11 | Bear families | 5 | |
Paroquet families | 10 | Bow families | 4 | |
Owl families | 9 | Spider families | 2 | |
Snake, Squash, Moth, Crane, Hawk, Mescal cake, Katcina, one each. Snake, squash, moth, crane, hawk, mescal cake, Katcina, one of each. |
No tradition of gentile localization was discovered in Cibola. Notwithstanding the decided difference in the general arrangements of rooms in the eastern and western portions of the village, the architectural evidence does not indicate the construction of the various portions of the present Zuñi by distinct groups of people.
No tradition of non-Indigenous settlement was found in Cibola. Despite the clear differences in the overall layout of the rooms in the eastern and western parts of the village, the architectural evidence does not suggest that the different sections of the current Zuñi were built by separate groups of people.
INTERIOR ARRANGEMENT.
On account of the purpose for which much of the architectural data here given were originally obtained, viz, for the construction of large scale models of the pueblos, the material is much more abundant for the treatment of exterior than of interior details. Still, when the walls and roof, with all their attendant features, have been fully recorded, little remains to be described about a pueblo house; for such of its interior details as do not connect with the external features are of the simplest character. At the time of the survey of these pueblos no exhaustive study of the interior of the houses was practicable, but the illustrations present typical dwelling rooms from both Tusayan and Zuñi. As a rule the rooms are smaller in Tusayan than at Zuñi.
Because of the purpose for which much of the architectural data provided here was originally gathered—that is, for building large-scale models of the pueblos—there is much more information available about the exterior than the interior details. However, once the walls and roof, along with all their related features, are fully documented, there is little left to describe about a pueblo house; the interior details that don’t connect to the external features are quite simple. During the survey of these pueblos, a thorough study of the interior of the houses wasn't practical, but the illustrations showcase typical living rooms from both Tusayan and Zuñi. Generally, the rooms in Tusayan are smaller than those in Zuñi.
![]() |
Fig. 20.
Interior ground plan of a Tusayan room. |
The illustration, Fig. 20, shows the ground plan of a second-story room of Mashongnavi. This room measures 13 by 12½ feet, and is considerably 109 below the average size of the rooms in these villages. A projecting buttress or pier in the middle of the east wall divides that end of the room into two portions. One side is provided with facilities for storage in the construction of a bench or ledge, used as a shelf, 3 feet high from the floor; and a small inclosed triangular bin, built directly on the floor, by fixing a thin slab of stone into the masonry. The whole construction has been treated with the usual coating of mud, which has afterwards been whitewashed, with the exception of a 10-inch band that encircles the whole room at the floor line, occupying the position of a baseboard. The other side of the dividing pier forms a recess, that is wholly given up to a series of metates or mealing stones; an indispensable feature of every pueblo household. It is quite common to find a series of metates, as in the present instance, filling the entire available width of a recess or bay, and leaving only so much of its depth behind the stones as will afford floor space for the kneeling women who grind the corn. In larger open apartments undivided by buttress or pier, the metates are usually built in or near one corner. They are always so arranged that those who operate them face the middle of the room. The floor is simply a smoothly plastered dressing of clay of the same character as the usual external roof covering. It is, in fact, simply the roof of the room below smoothed and finished with special care. Such apartments, even in upper stories, are sometimes carefully paved over the entire surface with large flat slabs of stone. It is often difficult to procure rectangular slabs of sufficient size for this purpose, but the irregularities of outline of the large flat stones are very skillfully interfitted, furnishing, when finished, a smoothly paved floor easily swept and kept clean.
The illustration, Fig. 20, shows the floor plan of a second-story room in Mashongnavi. This room is 13 by 12½ feet and is smaller than the typical rooms in these villages. A projecting buttress or pier in the middle of the east wall splits that end of the room into two sections. One side has storage facilities with a bench or ledge used as a shelf, 3 feet high from the floor, and a small enclosed triangular bin built directly on the floor using a thin slab of stone set into the masonry. The entire construction is covered with the usual layer of mud, which has then been whitewashed, except for a 10-inch band that runs around the room at the floor line, acting as a baseboard. The other side of the dividing pier creates a recess dedicated to a series of metates or grinding stones; an essential feature in every pueblo household. It’s common to see a series of metates filling the entire width of a recess or bay, leaving just enough space behind the stones for the kneeling women who grind corn. In larger open areas without any divisive buttresses or piers, metates are typically placed near one corner, arranged so that those using them face the center of the room. The floor is simply a smoothly plastered layer of clay, similar to the usual exterior roof covering. In fact, it’s just the roof of the room below, smoothed and finished with extra attention. Such rooms, even on upper levels, are sometimes fully paved with large flat stone slabs. It can be challenging to find rectangular slabs big enough for this, but the irregular shapes of the large flat stones are skillfully interlocked, resulting in a smooth floor that is easy to sweep and keep clean.
On the right of the doorway as one enters this house are the fireplace and chimney, built in the corner of the room. In this case the chimney hood is of semicircular form, as indicated on the plan. The entire chimney is illustrated in Fig. 62, which represents the typical curved form of hood. In the corner of the left as one enters are two ollas, or water jars, which are always kept filled. On the floor near the water jars is indicated a jug or canteen, a form of vessel used for bringing in water from the springs and wells at the foot of the mesa. At Zuñi water seems to be all brought directly in the ollas, or water jars, in which it is kept, this canteen form not being in use for the purpose.
On the right side of the doorway as you enter this house are the fireplace and chimney, located in the corner of the room. The chimney hood has a semicircular shape, as shown in the plan. The entire chimney is depicted in Fig. 62, which displays the typical curved shape of the hood. In the left corner as you enter, there are two ollas, or water jars, that are always kept full. On the floor near the water jars, there's a jug or canteen, a type of container used for bringing in water from the springs and wells at the base of the mesa. At Zuñi, it looks like water is mostly brought directly into the ollas, or water jars, where it is stored; this canteen style isn’t used for that purpose.
The entrance doorway to this house, as indicated on the plan, is set back or stepped on one side, a type of opening which is quite common in Tusayan. This form is illustrated in Fig. 84.
The entrance doorway to this house, as shown on the plan, is recessed or set back on one side, a style of opening that is quite common in Tusayan. This form is illustrated in Fig. 84.
Plate LXXXIV. A house-building at Oraibi.
Plate LXXXIV. A house being built at Oraibi.
This room has three windows, all of very small size, but it has no interior communication with any other room. In this respect it is exceptional. Ordinarily rooms communicate with others of the cluster.
This room has three small windows, but it doesn’t connect to any other room. That's unusual. Usually, rooms are linked to others in the group.
Pl. LXXXV shows another typical Tusayan interior in perspective. It illustrates essentially the same arrangement as does the preceding example. The room is much larger than the one above described, and it 110 is divided midway of its length by a similar buttress. This buttress supports a heavy girder, thus admitting of the use of two tiers of floor beams to span the whole length of the room. The fireplace and chimney are similar to those described, as is also the single compartment for mealing stones. In this case, however, this portion of the room is quite large, and the row of mealing stones is built at right angles to its back wall and not parallel with it.
Pl. L85 shows another typical Tusayan interior in perspective. It illustrates basically the same layout as the previous example. The room is much larger than the one described above, and it 110 is divided in the middle of its length by a similar support. This support holds up a heavy beam, allowing for two tiers of floor beams to span the entire length of the room. The fireplace and chimney are similar to those described, as is the single area for mealing stones. In this case, though, this part of the room is quite large, and the row of mealing stones is positioned at right angles to the back wall instead of parallel to it.
Plate LXXXV. A Tusayan interior.
Plate 85. A Tusayan interior.
The right-hand portion of the room is provided with a long, straight pole suspended from the roof beams. This is a common feature in both Tusayan and Zuñi. The pole is used for the suspension of the household stock of blankets and other garments. The windows of this house are small, and two of them, in the right-hand division of the room, have been roughly sealed up with masonry.
The right side of the room has a long, straight pole hanging from the ceiling beams. This is a typical feature in both Tusayan and Zuñi homes. The pole is used to hang up the household's blankets and other clothing. The windows in this house are small, and two of them in the right side of the room have been roughly sealed with bricks.
Pl. LXXXVI illustrates a typical Zuñi interior. In this instance the example happens to be rather larger than the average room. It will be noticed that this apartment has many features in common with that at Tusayan last described. The pole upon which blankets are suspended is here incorporated into the original construction of the house, its two ends being deeply embedded in the masonry of the wall. The entire floor is paved with slabs of much more regular form than any used at Tusayan. The Zuñi have access to building stone which is of a much better grade than is available in Tusayan.
Pl. L86 shows a typical Zuñi interior. In this case, the example is larger than the average room. You'll notice that this space has many features in common with the one described at Tusayan. The pole used to hang blankets is integrated into the original structure of the house, with both ends firmly set in the wall's masonry. The entire floor is covered with slabs that are much more uniform in shape than those used at Tusayan. The Zuñi have access to building stone that is of a much higher quality than what's available in Tusayan.
Plate LXXXVI. A Zuñi interior.
Plate 86. A Zuñi interior.
This room is furnished with long, raised benches of masonry along the sides, a feature much more common at Zuñi than at Tusayan. Usually such benches extend along the whole length of a wall, but here the projection is interrupted on one side by the fireplace and chimney, and on the left it terminates abruptly near the beginning of a tier of mealing stones, in order to afford floor space for the women who grind. The metates are arranged in the usual manner, three in a row, but there is an additional detached section placed at right angles to the main series. The sill of the doorway by which this room communicates with an adjoining one is raised about 18 inches above the floor, and is provided with a rudely mortised door in a single panel. Alongside is a small hole through which the occupant can prop the door on the inside of the communicating room. The subsequent sealing of the small hand-hole with mud effectually closes the house against intrusion. The unusual height of this door sill from the floor has necessitated the construction of a small step, which is built of masonry and covered with a single slab of stone. All the doors of Zuñi are more or less raised above the ground or floor, though seldom to the extent shown in the present example. This room has no external door and can be directly entered only by means of the hatchway and ladder shown in the drawing. At one time this room was probably bounded by outer walls and was provided with both door and windows, though now no evidence of the door remains, and the windows have become niches in the wall utilized for the reception of the small odds and ends of a Zuñi household. The 111 chimney of this house will be noticed as differing materially, both in form and in its position in the room, from the Tusayan examples. This form is, however, the most common type of chimney used in Zuñi at the present time, although many examples of the curved type also occur. It is built about midway of the long wall of the room. The Tusayan chimneys seldom occupy such a position, but are nearly always built in corners. The use of a pier or buttress-projection for the support of a roof girder that is characteristic of Tusayan is not practiced at Zuñi to any extent. Deer horns have been built into the wall of the room to answer the purpose of pegs, upon which various household articles are suspended.
This room has long, raised stone benches along the sides, which are much more common in Zuñi than in Tusayan. Usually, these benches run the entire length of a wall, but here, one side is interrupted by the fireplace and chimney, and on the left, it ends suddenly near the start of a row of grinding stones, creating space for the women who are grinding. The grinding stones are arranged in the usual way, with three in a row, but there’s also an extra section placed at a right angle to the main setup. The doorway connecting this room to the next one is about 18 inches above the floor, and it has a roughly made single-panel door. Next to it is a small hole through which someone can prop the door from inside the adjoining room. Sealing the small hand-hole with mud effectively secures the house against intruders. The unusual height of the door sill requires a small step, made of stone and covered with a single slab. All the doors in Zuñi are raised above the ground or floor to some degree, but rarely to the extent seen here. This room doesn’t have an external door and can only be accessed through the hatchway and ladder shown in the drawing. At one point, this room likely had outer walls and included both a door and windows, but now there’s no sign of the door, and the windows have turned into niches used to store small items of a Zuñi household. The 111 chimney of this house is notably different in both shape and position from those found in Tusayan. This design is currently the most common type of chimney used in Zuñi, though there are also many curved types. It is positioned approximately midway along the long wall of the room. In contrast, Tusayan chimneys are rarely found in such locations and are almost always in corners. The use of a pier or buttress projection to support a roof girder, typical in Tusayan, is not commonly practiced in Zuñi. Deer horns have been built into the wall of the room to serve as pegs for hanging various household items.
The various features, whose positions in the pueblo dwelling house have been briefly described above, will each be made the subject of more exhaustive study in tracing the various modifications of form through which they have passed. The above outline will furnish a general idea of the place that these details occupy in the house itself.
The different features mentioned earlier, whose locations in the pueblo dwelling have been briefly outlined, will each be examined in more detail to explore the changes in form they have undergone. This overview will provide a general sense of where these details fit within the house itself.
KIVAS IN TUSAYAN.
General use of kivas.—Wherever the remains of pueblo architecture occur among the plateaus of the southwest there appears in every important village throughout all changes of form, due to variations of environment and other causes, the evidence of chambers of exceptional character. The chambers are distinguishable from the typical dwelling rooms by their size and position, and, generally, in ancient examples, by their circular form. This feature of pueblo architecture has survived to the present time, and is prominent in all modern pueblos that have come under the writer’s notice, including the villages of Acoma and Jemez, belonging to the Rio Grande group, as well as in the pueblos under discussion. In all the pueblos that have been examined, both ancient and modern, with the exception of those of Tusayan, these special rooms, used for ceremonial purposes, occupy marginal or semidetached positions in the house clusters. The latter are wholly detached from the houses, as may be seen from the ground plans.
General use of kivas.—Wherever you find the remains of pueblo architecture in the southwestern plateaus, every significant village shows evidence of unique chambers, regardless of the changes in form caused by different environments and other factors. These chambers stand out from regular living rooms by their size, layout, and often, in ancient examples, their circular shape. This aspect of pueblo architecture has persisted into modern times and is noticeable in all contemporary pueblos I've observed, including the villages of Acoma and Jemez, part of the Rio Grande group, as well as in the pueblos we're discussing. In all the pueblos examined, both ancient and modern, except for those in Tusayan, these special rooms, designed for ceremonial use, are found in marginal or semi-detached positions within the clusters of houses. The latter are completely detached from the homes, as is evident from the ground plans.
Origin of the name.—Such ceremonial rooms are known usually by the Spanish term “estufa,” meaning literally a stove, and here used in the sense of “sweat house,” but the term is misleading, as it more properly describes the small sweat houses that are used ceremonially by lodge-building Indians, such as the Navajo. At the suggestion of Major Powell the Tusayan word for this everpresent feature of pueblo architecture has been adopted, as being much more appropriate. The word “kiva,” then, will be understood to designate the ceremonial chamber of the pueblo building peoples, ancient and modern.
Origin of the name.—These ceremonial rooms are usually referred to by the Spanish term “estufa,” which literally means stove, and is used here in the context of “sweat house.” However, this term is somewhat misleading, as it more accurately describes the small sweat houses used ceremonially by lodge-building Native Americans, like the Navajo. Following Major Powell's suggestion, the Tusayan word for this common feature of pueblo architecture has been adopted, as it better reflects its significance. Therefore, the term “kiva” will be understood to refer to the ceremonial chamber of the pueblo people, both ancient and modern.
Antiquity of the kiva.—The widespread occurrence of this feature and its evident antiquity distinguish it as being especially worthy of exhaustive study, especially as embodied in its construction maybe found survivals of early methods of arrangement that have long ago become 112 extinct in the constantly improving art of housebuilding, but which are preserved through the well known tendency of the survival of ancient practice in matters pertaining to the religious observances of a primitive people. Unfortunately, in the past the Zuñi have been exposed to the repressive policy of the Spanish authorities, and this has probably seriously affected the purity of the kiva type. At one time, when the ceremonial observances of the Zuñi took place in secret for fear of incurring the wrath of the Spanish priests, the original kivas must have been wholly abandoned, and though at the present time some of the kivas of Zuñi occupy marginal positions in the cell clusters, just as in many ancient examples, it is doubtful whether these rooms faithfully represent the original type of kiva. There seems to be but little structural evidence to distinguish the present kivas from ordinary large Zuñi rooms beyond the special character of the fireplace and of the entrance trap door, features which will be fully described later. At Tusayan, on the other hand, we find a distinct and characteristic structural plan of the kiva, as well as many special constructive devices. Although the position of the ceremonial room is here exceptional in its entire separation from the dwelling, this is due to clearly traceable influences in the immediate orograpic environment, and the wholly subterranean arrangement of most of the kivas in this group is also due to the same local causes.
Antiquity of the kiva.—The widespread presence of this feature and its clear historical significance make it especially worthy of thorough study, particularly since its construction may preserve remnants of early arrangement methods that have long since disappeared in the ever-evolving art of housebuilding. These ancient practices have survived due to the strong tendency of primitive peoples to maintain traditional customs related to their religious observances. Unfortunately, the Zuñi have faced oppressive policies from the Spanish authorities in the past, which have likely impacted the authenticity of the kiva type. At one point, when the Zuñi carried out their ceremonies in secret to avoid the anger of Spanish priests, the original kivas were likely entirely abandoned. Although some of the Zuñi kivas now exist in less central locations within the cell clusters, similar to many ancient examples, it's uncertain whether these rooms accurately reflect the original kiva type. There seems to be very little structural evidence to differentiate the current kivas from large, ordinary Zuñi rooms, aside from the unique features of the fireplace and the entrance trap door, which will be described in detail later. In contrast, at Tusayan, we see a distinct and recognizable structural design for the kiva, as well as numerous unique construction features. While the ceremonial room is notably separated from the residing area, this is attributable to clear influences from the local geographic environment, and the entirely underground structure of most kivas in this group can also be traced back to the same local factors.
Plate LXXXVII. A kiva hatchway of Tusayan.
Plate LXXXVII. A kiva entrance of Tusayan.
Excavation of the kiva.—The tendency to depress or partly excavate the ceremonial chamber existed in Zuñi, as in all the ancient pueblo buildings which have been examined; but the solid rock of the mesa tops in Tusayan did not admit of the necessary excavation, and the persistence of this requirement, which, as I shall elsewhere show, has an important connection with the early types of pueblo building, compelled the occupants of these rocky sites to locate their kivas at points where depressions already existed. Such facilities were most abundant near the margins of the mesas, where in many places large blocks of sandstone have fallen out from the edge of the surface stratum, leaving nearly rectangular spaces at the summit of the cliff wall. The construction of their villages on these rocky promontories forced the Tusayan builders to sacrifice, to a large extent, the traditional and customary arrangement of the kivas within the house-inclosed courts of the pueblo, in order to obtain properly depressed sites. This accidental effect of the immediate environment resulted in giving unusual prominence to the sinking of the ceremonial room below the ground surface, but a certain amount of excavation is found as a constant accompaniment of this feature throughout the pueblo region in both ancient and modern villages. Even at Zuñi, where the kivas appear to retain but few of the specialized features that distinguish them at Tusayan, the floors are found to be below the general level of the ground. But at Tusayan the development of this single requirement has been carried to such an extent that many of the kivas are 113 wholly subterranean. This is particularly the case with those that occupy marginal sites on the mesas, such as have been referred to above. In such instances the broken-out recesses in the upper rocks have been walled up on the outside, roughly lined with masonry within, and roofed over in the usual manner. In many cases the depth of these rock niches is such that the kiva roof when finished does not project above the general level of the mesa summit, and its earth covering is indistinguishable from the adjoining surface, except for the presence of the box-like projection of masonry that surrounds the entrance trap door and its ladder (see Pl. LXXXVII). Frequently in such cases the surface of the ground shows no evidence of the outlines or dimensions of the underlying room. Examples of such subterranean kivas may be seen in the foreground of the general view of a court in Oraibi (Pl. XXXVIII), and in the view of the dance rock at Walpi (Pl. XXIV). But such wholly subterranean arrangement of the ceremonial chamber is by no means universal even at Tusayan. Even when the kiva was placed within the village courts or close to the houses, in conformity to the traditional plan and ancient practice as evidenced in the ruins, naturally depressed sites were still sought; but such sites as the mesa margin affords were rarely available at any distance from the rocky rim. The result is that most of the court kivas are only partly depressed. This is particularly noticeable in a court kiva in Shumopavi, an illustration of which is given in Fig. 14.
Excavation of the kiva.—The practice of lowering or partially digging out the ceremonial chamber was common in Zuñi, just like in all the ancient pueblo buildings that have been studied; however, the solid rock of the mesa tops in Tusayan made it impossible to achieve the necessary excavation. This requirement, which I will explain further, is closely linked to the earliest types of pueblo construction, forced the inhabitants of these rocky areas to place their kivas where depressions naturally existed. These suitable spots were most frequently found near the edges of the mesas, where large chunks of sandstone often fell away, creating almost rectangular openings at the top of the cliff walls. Building their villages on these rocky outcrops meant that the Tusayan builders had to largely abandon the traditional layout of kivas within the enclosed court areas of the pueblo, in order to find adequately depressed locations. This environmental influence resulted in a notable emphasis on having the ceremonial room sunk below the ground level, but some excavation consistently accompanies this trait across the pueblo region in both ancient and contemporary villages. Even in Zuñi, where the kivas seem to lack many of the unique features seen in those at Tusayan, the floors are still below the overall ground level. In Tusayan, however, the need for this aspect has been taken to such an extreme that many of the kivas are completely underground. This situation is especially true for those that are located at the edges of mesas, as previously mentioned. Here, the recesses formed in the upper rock have been enclosed on the outside, roughly lined with masonry inside, and covered with a roof in the usual way. In many cases, the depth of these rock niches is such that the finished kiva roof doesn't extend above the general level of the mesa surface, and its earth covering blends in with the surrounding ground, except for the box-like masonry projection marking the entrance trap door and its ladder (see Pl. 87). Often, the ground surface shows no signs of the outlines or dimensions of the room beneath. Examples of these entirely subterranean kivas can be seen in the foreground of a general view of a court in Oraibi (Pl. XXXVIII), and in the view of the dance rock at Walpi (Pl. XXIV). However, this completely underground arrangement of the ceremonial chamber is not universal even in Tusayan. Even when the kiva was built within the village courts or close to the houses, following the traditional design and ancient practice as indicated by the ruins, naturally depressed locations were still preferred; however, such sites near the mesa edge were seldom available at any distance from the rocky rim. As a result, most of the court kivas are only partially lowered. This is particularly evident in a court kiva located in Shumopavi, an illustration of which is provided in Fig. 14.
Plate LXXXVIII. North kivas of Shumopavi, from the northeast.
Plate LXXXVIII. North kivas of Shumopavi, viewed from the northeast.
The mungkiva or principal kiva of Shupaulovi, illustrated in Pl. XXXIII, is scarcely a foot above the ground level on the side towards the houses, but its rough walls are exposed to a height of several feet down on the declivity of the knoll. The view of the stone corrals of Mashongnavi, shown in Pl. CIX, also illustrates a kiva of the type described. This chamber is constructed on a sharp slope of the declivity where a natural depression favored the builders. On the upper side the roof is even with the ground, but on its outer or southern side the masonry is exposed to nearly the whole depth of the chamber. At the north end of Shumopavi, just outside the houses, are two kivas, one of which is of the semi-subterranean type. The other shows scarcely any masonry above the ground outside of the box-like entrance way. Pl. LXXXVIII illustrates these two kivas as seen from the northeast, and shows their relation to the adjacent houses. The following (Fig. 21) illustrates the same group from the opposite point of view.
The main kiva of Shupaulovi, shown in Pl. XXXIII, is barely a foot above ground level on the side facing the houses, but its rugged walls are exposed for several feet down the slope of the knoll. The view of the stone corrals of Mashongnavi, depicted in Pl. CIX, also shows a kiva of the type described. This chamber is built on a steep slope where a natural dip aided the builders. On the upper side, the roof is level with the ground, but on the outer or southern side, the masonry is visible almost to the bottom of the chamber. At the north end of Shumopavi, just outside the houses, there are two kivas; one is of the semi-subterranean type, while the other has almost no masonry above ground except for the box-like entrance. Pl. 88 displays these two kivas as viewed from the northeast and shows how they relate to the nearby houses. The following (Fig. 21) shows the same group from the opposite perspective.
Fig. 21. North kivas of Shumopavi, seen from the southwest.
Fig. 21. North kivas of Shumopavi, viewed from the southwest.
Access.—The last described semi-subterranean kiva and the similar one in the court of the village, show a short flight of stone steps on their eastern side. Entrance to the ceremonial chamber is prevented when necessary by the removal of the ladder from the outside, or in some instances by the withdrawal of the rungs, which are loosely inserted into holes in the side pieces. There is no means of preventing access to the exposed trap doors, which are nearly on a level with the ground. As a matter of convenience and to facilitate the entrance into 114 the kiva of costumed and masked dancers, often encumbered with clumsy paraphernalia, steps are permanently built into the outside wall of the kiva in direct contradiction to the ancient principles of construction; that is, in having no permanent or fixed means of access from the ground to the first roof. These are the only cases in which stone steps spring directly from the ground, although they are a very important feature in Tusayan house architecture above the first story, as may be seen in any of the general views of the villages. The justification of such an arrangement in connection with the indefensible kiva roof lies obviously in the different conditions here found as compared with the dwellings.
Access.—The last described semi-subterranean kiva and the similar one in the village courtyard, show a short flight of stone steps on their eastern side. Access to the ceremonial chamber is restricted when necessary by removing the ladder from the outside, or in some cases by pulling out the rungs, which are loosely fitted into holes in the side pieces. There is no way to prevent access to the exposed trap doors, which are almost level with the ground. To make it easier for costumed and masked dancers, often weighed down with bulky props, to enter the kiva, steps have been permanently built into the outside wall of the kiva, going against the ancient construction principles; that is, by having no permanent or fixed means of access from the ground to the first roof. These are the only instances where stone steps rise directly from the ground, although they are a significant feature in Tusayan house architecture above the first story, as can be seen in any general views of the villages. The reason for such an arrangement in relation to the vulnerable kiva roof is clearly linked to the different conditions found here compared to the dwellings. 114
The subterranean kiva of the Shumopavi group, above illustrated, is exceptional as occurring at some distance from the mesa rim. Probably all such exceptions to the rule are located in natural fissures or crevices of the sandstone, or where there was some unusual facility for the excavation of the site to the required depth. The most noteworthy example of such inner kiva being located with reference to favorable rock fissures has been already described in discussing the ground plan of Walpi and its southern court-inclosed kiva (p. 65).
The underground kiva of the Shumopavi group, shown above, is unique because it's located quite a distance from the mesa edge. Most exceptions to this pattern are probably found in natural cracks or crevices in the sandstone, or where there was a specific advantage for digging the site to the necessary depth. The most notable example of such an inner kiva being positioned near suitable rock fissures has already been described while discussing the layout of Walpi and its southern courtyard kiva (p. 65).
Masonry.—The exterior masonry of these chambers seems in all cases to be of ruder construction than that of the dwelling houses. This is particularly noticeable in the kivas of Walpi on the mesa edge, but is apparent even in some of the Zuñi examples. One of the kivas of house No. 1 in Zuñi, near the churchyard, has small openings in its wall that are rudely framed with stone slabs set in a stone wall of exceptional roughness. Apparently there has never been any attempt to smooth or reduce this wall to a finished surface with the usual coating of adobe mud.
Masonry.—The outer masonry of these rooms seems to be more poorly constructed than that of the homes. This is especially noticeable in the kivas of Walpi on the mesa's edge, but it's also evident in some of the Zuñi examples. One of the kivas in house No. 1 in Zuñi, near the churchyard, features small openings in its wall that are crudely framed with stone slabs set into a very rough stone wall. It seems there has never been any effort to smooth or finish this wall with the typical layer of adobe mud.
115 In Tusayan also some of the kiva walls look as though they had been built of the first material that came to hand, piled up nearly dry, and with no attempt at the chinking of joints, that imparts some degree of finish to the dwelling-house masonry. The inside of these kivas, however, is usually plastered smoothly, but the interior plastering is applied on a base of masonry even in the case of the kivas that are wholly subterranean. It seems to be the Tusayan practice to line all sides of the kivas with stone masonry, regardless of the completeness and fitness of the natural cavity. It is impossible, therefore, to ascertain from the interior of a kiva how much of the work of excavation is artificial and how much has been done by nature. The lining of masonry probably holds the plastering of adobe mud much better than the naked surface of the rock, but the Tusayan builders would hardly resort to so laborious a device to gain this small advantage. The explanation of this apparent waste of labor lies in the fact that kivas had been built of masonry from time immemorial, and that the changed conditions of the present Tusayan environment have not exerted their influence for a sufficient length of time to overcome the traditional practice. As will be seen later, the building of a kiva is accompanied by certain rites and ceremonies based on the use of masonry walls, additional testimony of the comparatively recent date of the present subterranean types.
115 In Tusayan, some of the kiva walls look like they were made from the first materials available, stacked up almost dry, without any effort to fill in the gaps, which usually gives some polish to the masonry of a house. The insides of these kivas are typically plastered smoothly, but the plaster is put on top of a masonry base, even for those kivas that are entirely underground. It seems to be common practice in Tusayan to line all sides of the kivas with stone masonry, regardless of how complete or suitable the natural cavity is. Therefore, it’s impossible to tell from inside a kiva how much of the excavation was done manually and how much was formed by nature. The stone lining likely supports the adobe plaster better than the bare rock surface, but the Tusayan builders probably wouldn’t go to such great lengths for such a small benefit. The reason for this seemingly excessive effort stems from the fact that kivas have been built with masonry for a very long time, and the changes in the current environment of Tusayan haven’t been around long enough to shift this traditional method. As will be discussed later, building a kiva involves specific rites and ceremonies based on having masonry walls, further evidence of the relatively recent development of the current underground types.
Orientation.—In questioning the Tusayan on this subject Mr. Stephen was told that no attention to the cardinal points was observed in the plan, although the walls are spoken of according to the direction to which they most closely approximate. An examination of the village plans of the preceding chapters, however, will show a remarkable degree of uniformity in the directions of kivas which can scarcely be due to accident in rooms built on such widely differing sites. The intention seems to have been to arrange these ceremonial chambers approximately on the north and south line, though none of the examples approach the meridian very closely. Most of them face southeast, though some, particularly in Walpi, face west of south. In Walpi four of the five kivas are planned on a southwest and northeast line, following the general direction of the mesa edge, while the remaining one faces southeast. The difference in this last case may have been brought about by exigencies of the site on the mesa edge and the form of the cavity in which the kiva was built. Again at Hano and Sichumovi (Pls. XVI and XVIII) on the first mesa this uniformity of direction prevails, but, as the plans show, the kivas in these two villages are few in number. The two kivas of Shupaulovi will be seen (Pl. XXX) to have the same direction, viz, facing southeast. In Shumopavi (Pl. XXXIV) there are four kivas all facing southeast. In Mashongnavi, however (Pl. XXVI), the same uniformity does not prevail. Three of the kivas face south of east, and two others built in the edge of the rocky bench on the south side of the village face west of south. In the large village 116 of Oraibi there is remarkable uniformity in the direction of the many kivas, there being a variation of only a few degrees in direction in the whole number of thirteen shown on the plan (Pl. XXXVI). But in the case of the large kiva partly above ground designated as the Coyote kiva, the direction from which it is entered is the reverse of that of the other kivas. No explanation is offered that will account for this curious single exception to the rule. The intention of the builders has evidently been to make the altar and its attendant structural features conform to a definite direction, fixed, perhaps, by certain requirements of the ceremonial, but the irregularity of the general village plan in many cases resulting from its adaptation to restricted sites, has given rise to the variations that are seen.
Orientation.—When Mr. Stephen asked the Tusayan about this topic, they mentioned that the cardinal points weren't really taken into account in the design, even though the walls are described based on the directions they most closely follow. However, looking at the village layouts from earlier chapters reveals a striking consistency in the orientations of kivas that seems unlikely to be random, especially given the varying locations in which they were built. The goal appears to have been to align these ceremonial rooms roughly along the north-south axis, even though none of the examples come very close to the meridian. Most of them face southeast, while some, especially in Walpi, face west of south. In Walpi, four out of five kivas are oriented along a southwest-northeast line, following the general direction of the mesa's edge, whereas the fifth kiva faces southeast. The difference in this case could be due to the specific site conditions on the mesa edge and the shape of the space where the kiva was constructed. Similarly, at Hano and Sichumovi (Pls. XVI and XVIII), this consistency in direction is evident, although, as shown in the plans, there are only a few kivas in these two villages. The two kivas in Shupaulovi are noted (Pl. XXX) to have the same orientation, which is southeast. In Shumopavi (Pl. XXXIV), all four kivas also face southeast. However, in Mashongnavi (Pl. XXVI), this consistency is absent. Three kivas face south of east, and two others, located on the rocky ledge on the village's south side, face west of south. In the large village of Oraibi, there is significant uniformity in the orientation of the numerous kivas, with only a few degrees of variation among the thirteen shown on the plan (Pl. XXXVI). However, in the case of the large kiva, known as the Coyote kiva, which is partially above ground, the entry direction is the opposite of the other kivas. No explanation is provided for this unique exception. The builders clearly aimed to align the altar and its related structures with a specific direction, likely dictated by certain ceremonial needs, but the irregular nature of the overall village layout in many instances, influenced by limited sites, has led to the variations observed.
In Zuñi there was an evident purpose to preserve a certain uniformity of direction in the kiva entrances. In house No. 1 (Pls. LXXVI and LXXVII) there are two kivas, distinguishable on the plan by the large divided trap door. The entrance of these both face southeast, and it can readily be seen that this conformity has been provided intentionally, since the rooms themselves do not correspond in arrangement. The roof opening is in one case across the room and in the other it is placed longitudinally. As has been pointed out above, the general plan of arranging the kivas is not so readily distinguished in Zuñi as in Tusayan. Uniformity, so far as it is traceable, is all the more striking as occurring where there is so much more variation in the directions of the walls of the houses. Still another confirmation is furnished by the pueblo of Acoma, situated about 60 miles eastward from Zuñi. Here the kivas are six in number and the directions of all the examples are found to vary but a few degrees. These also face east of south.
In Zuñi, there was a clear intention to maintain a certain consistency in the direction of kiva entrances. In house No. 1 (Pls. LXXVI and 77), there are two kivas, identifiable on the plan by the large divided trap door. The entrances of both face southeast, and it's easy to see that this alignment was intentional, as the rooms themselves are arranged differently. The roof opening in one case is across the room, while in the other, it is positioned lengthwise. As mentioned earlier, the overall layout of kivas is not as easily distinguished in Zuñi as it is in Tusayan. The uniformity, where it exists, is even more noticeable given the greater variation in the directions of the house walls. Another confirmation comes from the pueblo of Acoma, located about 60 miles east of Zuñi. Here, there are six kivas, and the directions of all of them vary by only a few degrees. These also face southeast.
There are reasons for believing that the use of rectangular kivas is of later origin in the pueblo system of building than the use of the circular form of ceremonial chamber that is of such frequent occurrence among the older ruins. Had strict orientation of the rectangular kiva prevailed for long periods of time it would undoubtedly have exerted a strong influence towards the orientation of the entire pueblo clusters in which the kivas were incorporated; but in the earlier circular form, the constructional ceremonial devices could occupy definite positions in relation to the cardinal points at any part of the inner curve of the wall without necessarily exerting any influence on the directions of adjoining dwellings.
There are reasons to believe that rectangular kivas developed later in the pueblo building system than the circular ceremonial chambers, which are commonly found among older ruins. If strict orientation of the rectangular kiva had been maintained for long periods, it would likely have strongly influenced the orientation of the entire pueblo clusters containing the kivas. However, with the earlier circular form, the constructional ceremonial devices could be positioned in relation to the cardinal points anywhere along the inner curve of the wall without necessarily affecting the orientation of the nearby dwellings.
The ancient form of kiva.—In none of the ruins examined in the province of Tusayan have distinct traces of ancient kivas been found, nor do any of them afford evidence as to the character of the ceremonial rooms. It is not likely, however, that the present custom of building these chambers wholly under ground prevailed generally among the earlier Tusayan villages, as some of the remains do not occupy sites that would suggest such arrangement. The typical circular kiva characteristic 117 of most of the ancient pueblos has not been seen within the limits of Tusayan, although it occurs constantly in the ruins of Canyon de Chelly which are occasionally referred to in Tusayan tradition as having been occupied by related peoples. Mr. Stephen, however, found vestiges of such ancient forms among the debris of fallen walls occupying two small knolls on the edge of the first mesa, at a point that overlooks the broken-down ruin of Sikyatki. On the southeast shoulder of one of the knolls is a fragment of a circular wall which was originally 12 feet in diameter. It is built of flat stones, from 2 to 4 inches thick, 6 to 8 inches wide, and a foot or more in length, nearly all of which have been pecked and dressed. Mud mortar has been sparingly used, and the masonry shows considerable care and skill in execution; the curve of the wall is fairly true, and the interstices of the masonry are neatly filled in with smaller fragments, in the manner of some of the best work of the Canyon de Chelly ruins.
The ancient form of kiva.—In none of the ruins examined in the Tusayan area have clear signs of ancient kivas been found, nor is there any evidence regarding the nature of the ceremonial rooms. It's unlikely that the current practice of building these chambers entirely underground was common among the earlier Tusayan villages, as some remains are situated in ways that don't suggest this layout. The typical circular kiva seen in most ancient pueblos has not been identified within the Tusayan region, although it is frequently found in the ruins of Canyon de Chelly, which are sometimes mentioned in Tusayan tradition as having been occupied by related groups. However, Mr. Stephen discovered remnants of such ancient structures among the debris of collapsed walls on two small hills on the edge of the first mesa, overlooking the crumbled remains of Sikyatki. On the southeast slope of one of the hills is a piece of a circular wall that was originally 12 feet in diameter. It is constructed from flat stones, measuring 2 to 4 inches thick, 6 to 8 inches wide, and a foot or more long, almost all of which have been shaped and prepared. Mud mortar has been used sparingly, and the stonework demonstrates considerable care and skill; the curve of the wall is quite accurate, and the gaps in the masonry are neatly filled with smaller pieces, similar to some of the finest work found in the Canyon de Chelly ruins. 117
The knoll farther south shows similar traces, and on the southeast slope is the complete ground plan of a round structure 16½ feet in diameter. At one point of the curved wall, which is about 22 inches thick, occurs the characteristic recessed katchinkihu (described later in discussing the interior of kivas) indicating the use of this chamber for ceremonial purposes.
The hill further south has similar signs, and on the southeast slope, there's a complete layout of a round structure that is 16½ feet in diameter. At one point along the curved wall, which is about 22 inches thick, there’s the typical recessed katchinkihu (which will be described later when discussing the interior of kivas), suggesting that this chamber was used for ceremonial purposes.
Although these remains probably antedate any of the Tusayan ruins discussed above (Chapter II), they suggest a connection and relationship between the typical kiva of the older ruins and the radically different form in use at the present time.
Although these remains probably predate any of the Tusayan ruins discussed above (Chapter II), they suggest a link and relationship between the typical kiva of the older ruins and the significantly different style in use today.
Native explanations of position.—Notwithstanding the present practice in the location of kivas, illustrated in the plans, the ideal village plan is still acknowledged to have had its house-clusters so distributed as to form inclosed and protected courts, the kivas being located within these courts or occupying marginal positions in the house-clusters on the edge of the inclosed areas. But the native explanations of the traditional plan are vague and contradictory.
Native explanations of position.—Despite the current layout of kivas shown in the plans, the ideal village design is still recognized to have arranged its house clusters in a way that created enclosed and protected courtyards, with the kivas situated within these courtyards or positioned along the edges of the house clusters surrounding the enclosed spaces. However, the local explanations for the traditional design are unclear and inconsistent.
In the floor of the typical kiva is a sacred cavity called the sipapuh, through which comes the beneficent influence of the deities or powers invoked. According to the accounts of some of the old men the kiva was constructed to inclose this sacred object, and houses were built on every side to surround the kiva and form its outer wall. In earlier times, too, so the priests relate, people were more devout, and the houses were planned with their terraces fronting upon the court, so that the women and children and all the people, could be close to the masked dancers (katchinas) as they issued from the kiva. The spectators filled the terraces, and sitting there they watched the katchinas dance in the court, and the women sprinkled meal upon them, while they listened to their songs. Other old men say the kiva was excavated in imitation of the original house in the interior of the earth, where the human family were created, and from which they climbed to the surface of the ground 118 by means of a ladder, and through just such an opening as the hatchway of the kiva. Another explanation commonly offered is that they are made underground because they are thus cooler in summer, and more easily warmed in winter.
In the floor of a typical kiva is a sacred space called the sipapuh, through which the beneficial influence of the deities or powers called upon flows. According to some of the elders' accounts, the kiva was built to contain this sacred object, with houses constructed around it to form its outer wall. The priests also say that in the past, people were more devoted, and the houses were designed with their terraces facing the courtyard, so that women, children, and everyone could be close to the masked dancers (katchinas) when they came out of the kiva. The spectators filled the terraces, watching the katchinas dance in the courtyard while the women sprinkled meal on them and listened to their songs. Other elders claim the kiva was dug out to mimic the original house within the earth, where humanity was created, and from which they climbed to the surface using a ladder and through an opening like the hatchway of the kiva. Another common explanation is that they are built underground because it's cooler in the summer and easier to heat in the winter. 118
All these factors may have had some influence in the design, but we have already seen that excavation to the extent here practiced is wholly exceptional in pueblo building and the unusual development of this requirement of kiva construction has been due to purely local causes. In the habitual practice of such an ancient and traditional device, the Indians have lost all record of the real causes of the perpetuation of this requirement. At Zuñi, too, a curious explanation is offered for the partial depression of the kiva floor below the general surrounding level. Here it is naively explained that the floor is excavated in order to attain a liberal height for the ceiling within the kiva, this being a room of great importance. Apparently it does not occur to the Zuñi architect that the result could be achieved in a more direct and much less laborious manner by making the walls a foot or so higher at the time of building the kiva, after the manner in which the same problem is solved when it is encountered in their ordinary dwelling house construction. Such explanations, of course, originated long after the practice became established.
All these factors might have influenced the design, but we've already seen that the level of excavation practiced here is completely unusual in pueblo building, and the unique development of this kiva construction requirement has been driven by purely local reasons. In the regular use of such an ancient and traditional method, the Indians have lost all record of the real reasons for the continuation of this practice. At Zuñi, too, there's an interesting explanation for the kiva floor being partially lower than the surrounding ground level. It's simply stated that the floor is dug out to create taller ceilings inside the kiva, which is a room of significant importance. It seems the Zuñi architect doesn't realize that this could be accomplished in a much simpler and less labor-intensive way by building the walls a foot or so higher when constructing the kiva, just like they do when addressing the same issue in their regular house construction. Such explanations, of course, came about long after the practice was already established.
METHODS OF KIVA BUILDING AND RITES.
The external appearance of the kivas of Tusayan has been described and illustrated; it now remains to examine the general form and method of construction of these subterranean rooms, and to notice the attendant rites and ceremonies.
The outside of the kivas in Tusayan has been described and shown; now we need to take a look at the overall layout and building method of these underground rooms, as well as the related rituals and ceremonies.
Typical plans.—All the Tusayan kivas are in the form of a parallelogram, usually about 25 feet long and half as wide, the ceiling, which is from 5½ to 8 feet high, being slightly higher in the middle than at either end. There is no prescribed rule for kiva dimensions, and seemingly the size of the chamber is determined according to the number who are to use it, and who assume the labor of its construction. A list of typical measurements obtained by Mr. Stephen is appended (p. 136).
Typical plans.—All the Tusayan kivas are shaped like a parallelogram, usually about 25 feet long and half as wide, with a ceiling height ranging from 5½ to 8 feet, which is slightly higher in the middle than at either end. There are no strict rules for kiva dimensions, and it seems that the size of the chamber is based on the number of people who will use it and who will take on the work of building it. A list of typical measurements gathered by Mr. Stephen is included (p. 136).
An excavation of the desired dimensions having been made, or an existing one having been discovered, the person who is to be chief of the kiva performs the same ceremony as that prescribed for the male head of a family when the building of a dwelling house is undertaken. He takes a handful of meal, mixed with piki crumbs, and a little of the crumbled herb they use as tobacco, and these he sprinkles upon the ground, beginning on the west side, passing southward, and so around, the sprinkled line he describes marking the position to be occupied by the walls. As he thus marks the compass of the kiva, he sings in a droning tone “Si-ai, a-hai, a-hai, si-ai, a-hai”—no other words but these. The meaning of these words seems to be unknown, but all the priests agree in saying that the archaic chant is addressed to the sun, and it 119 is called Kitdauwi—the House Song. The chief then selects four good-sized stones of hard texture for corner stones, and at each corner he lays a baho, previously prepared, sprinkles it with the mixture with which he has described the line of the walls, and then lays the corner stone upon it. As he does this, he expresses his hope that the walls “will take good root hold,” and stand firm and secure.
Once the desired excavation has been made or an existing one found, the person chosen to be the chief of the kiva performs the same ceremony required for the male head of a family when starting the construction of a house. He takes a handful of meal mixed with piki crumbs and a bit of the crumbled herb used as tobacco, and he sprinkles this mixture on the ground, starting from the west and moving southward, marking the position for where the walls will be. As he marks out the layout of the kiva, he sings in a low, droning voice “Si-ai, a-hai, a-hai, si-ai, a-hai”—no other words but these. The meaning of these words seems to be unknown, but all the priests agree that this ancient chant is directed toward the sun, and it is called Kitdauwi—the House Song. The chief then chooses four sturdy stones for the corners, and at each corner, he places a baho that he prepared earlier, sprinkles it with the same mixture used to outline the walls, and then lays the corner stone on top. As he does this, he expresses his hope that the walls “will take good root hold” and remain strong and secure.
The men have already quarried or collected a sufficient quantity of stone, and a wall is built in tolerably regular courses along each side of the excavation. The stones used are roughly dressed by fracture; they are irregular in shape, and of a size convenient for one man to handle. They are laid with only a very little mud mortar, and carried up, if the ground be level, to within 18 inches of the surface. If the kiva is built on the edge of the cliff, as at Walpi, the outside wall connects the sides of the gap, conforming to the line of the cliff. If the surface is sloping, the level of the roof is obtained by building up one side of the kiva above the ground to the requisite height as illustrated in Fig. 21. One end of the “Goat” kiva at Walpi is 5 feet above ground, the other end being level with the sloping surface. When the ledge on the precipitous face of the mesa is uneven it is filled in with rough masonry to obtain a level for the floor, and thus the outside wall of some of the Walpi kivas is more than 12 feet high, although in the interior the measurement from floor to ceiling is much less.
The men have already gathered enough stone, and a wall has been built in fairly even layers along each side of the pit. The stones used are roughly shaped by breaking; they are irregular in form and sized conveniently for one person to lift. They are stacked with only a bit of mud mortar and raised, if the ground is level, to within 18 inches of the surface. If the kiva is built on the edge of a cliff, like at Walpi, the outer wall connects the sides of the gap, following the cliff's line. If the ground is sloped, one side of the kiva is built up above the ground to the necessary height, as shown in Fig. 21. One end of the “Goat” kiva at Walpi is 5 feet above ground, while the other end is at the same level as the sloping surface. When the ledge on the steep face of the mesa is uneven, it is filled in with rough stonework to create a level floor, resulting in some of the outer walls of the Walpi kivas reaching more than 12 feet high, even though the height from floor to ceiling inside is much less.
Both cottonwood and pine are used for the roof timbers; they are roughly dressed, and some of them show that an attempt has been made to hew them with four sides, but none are square. In the roof of the “Goat” kiva, at Walpi, are four well hewn pine timbers, measuring exactly 6 by 10 inches, which are said to have been taken from the mission house built near Walpi by the Spanish priests some three centuries ago. The ceiling plan of the mungkiva of Shupaulovi (Fig. 23) shows that four of these old Spanish squared beams have been utilized in its construction. One of these is covered with a rude decoration of gouged grooves and bored holes, forming a curious line-and-dot ornament. The other kiva of this village contains a single undecorated square Spanish roof beam. This beam contrasts very noticeably with the rude round poles of the native work, one of which, in the case of the kiva last mentioned, is a forked trunk of a small tree. Some of the Indians say that the timbers were brought by them from the Shumopavi spring, where the early Spanish priests had established a mission. According to these accounts, the home mission was established at Walpi, with another chapel at Shumopavi, and a third and important one at Awatubi.
Both cottonwood and pine are used for the roof beams; they're roughly shaped, and some show that there was an effort to make them four-sided, but none are square. In the roof of the “Goat” kiva at Walpi, there are four well-hewn pine beams, measuring exactly 6 by 10 inches, which are said to have come from the mission house built near Walpi by Spanish priests about three centuries ago. The ceiling plan of the mungkiva of Shupaulovi (Fig. 23) shows that four of these old Spanish squared beams were used in its construction. One of these has a crude decoration of gouged grooves and bored holes, creating a unique line-and-dot pattern. The other kiva in this village has a single undecorated square Spanish roof beam. This beam stands out significantly compared to the rough round poles from local materials, one of which, in the other kiva mentioned, is a forked trunk of a small tree. Some of the Indians say that the timbers were brought from the Shumopavi spring, where the early Spanish priests established a mission. According to these stories, the main mission was set up at Walpi, with another chapel at Shumopavi, and a third important one at Awatubi.
One man, Sikapiki by name, stated that the squared and carved beams were brought from the San Francisco Mountains, more than a hundred miles away, under the direction of the priests, and that they were carved and finished prior to transportation. They were intended for the chapel and cloister, but the latter building was never finished. 120 The roof timbers were finally distributed among the people of Shumopavi and Shupaulovi. At Shumopavi one of the kivas, known, as the Nuvwatikyuobi (The-high-place-of-snow—San Francisco Mountains) kiva, was built only 8 years ago. The main roof timbers are seven in number. Four of them are hewn with flat sides, 8 by 12 inches to 9 by 13 inches; the other three are round, the under sides slightly hewn, and they are 12 inches in diameter. These timbers were brought from the San Francisco Mountains while the Spaniards were here. The Shumopavi account states that the people were compelled to drag most of the timbers with ropes, although oxen were also used in some cases, and that the Spaniards used them to roof their mission buildings. After the destruction of the mission these timbers were used in the construction of a dwelling house, which, falling into ruin, was abandoned and pulled down. Subsequently they were utilized as described above. In the Teosobi, Jay, the main timbers were taken out of it many years ago and used in another kiva. The timbers now in the roof are quite small and are laid in pairs, but they are old and much decayed. In the Gyarzobi, Paroquet, are six squared timbers from the Spanish mission buildings, measuring 9 by 13 inches, 8 by 12 inches, etc. These have the same curious grooved and dotted ornamentation that occurs on the square beam of Shupaulovi, above described. At the other end of the kiva are also two unusually perfect round timbers that may have come from the mission ruin. All of these show marks of fire, and are in places deeply charred.
One man, named Sikapiki, said that the squared and carved beams were brought from the San Francisco Mountains, over a hundred miles away, under the guidance of the priests, and that they were carved and finished before being transported. They were meant for the chapel and cloister, but the latter was never completed. 120 The roof timbers were eventually distributed among the people of Shumopavi and Shupaulovi. At Shumopavi, one of the kivas, known as the Nuvwatikyuobi (The-high-place-of-snow—San Francisco Mountains) kiva, was built only 8 years ago. There are seven main roof timbers. Four of them are hewn with flat sides, measuring between 8 by 12 inches and 9 by 13 inches; the other three are round, with the undersides slightly hewn, and have a diameter of 12 inches. These timbers were brought from the San Francisco Mountains while the Spaniards were present. The Shumopavi account mentions that the people had to drag most of the timbers with ropes, although oxen were also used in some instances, and that the Spaniards used them to roof their mission buildings. After the mission was destroyed, these timbers were used to build a house, which eventually fell into disrepair and was abandoned and torn down. Later, they were repurposed as described above. In the Teosobi, Jay, the main timbers were removed many years ago and used in another kiva. The timbers currently in the roof are quite small and arranged in pairs, but they are old and significantly decayed. In the Gyarzobi, Paroquet, there are six squared timbers from the Spanish mission buildings, measuring 9 by 13 inches, 8 by 12 inches, etc. These have the same unique grooved and dotted decoration found on the square beam of Shupaulovi mentioned earlier. At the other end of the kiva, there are also two unusually intact round timbers that may have come from the mission ruins. All of these show signs of fire and are charred in places.
In continuation of the kiva building process, the tops of the walls are brought to an approximate level. The main roof timbers are then laid parallel with the end walls, at irregular distances, but less than 3 feet apart, except near the middle, where a space of about 7 feet is left between two beams, as there the hatchway is to be built. The ends of the timbers rest upon the side walls, and as they are placed in position a small feather, to which a bit of cotton string is tied (nakwakwoci) is also placed under each. Stout poles, from which the bark has been stripped, are laid at right angles upon the timbers, with slight spaces between them. Near the center of the kiva two short timbers are laid across the two main beams about 5 feet apart; this is done to preserve a space of 5 by 7 feet for the hatchway, which is made with walls of stone laid in mud plaster, resting upon the two central beams and upon the two side pieces. This wall or combing is carried up so as to be at least 18 inches above the level of the finished roof. Across the poles, covering the rest of the roof, willows and straight twigs of any kind are laid close together, and over these is placed a layer of dry grass arranged in regular rows. Mud is then carefully spread over the grass to a depth of about 3 inches, and after it has nearly dried it is again gone over so as to fill up all the cracks. A layer of dry earth is then spread over all and firmly trodden down, to render the roof water-tight and bring its surface level with the surrounding ground, following the same method and order of construction that prevails in dwelling-house buildings.
In the ongoing process of building the kiva, the tops of the walls are leveled off. The main roof timbers are laid down parallel to the end walls, spaced irregularly but no more than 3 feet apart, except in the center where there is a gap of about 7 feet between two beams for the hatchway. The ends of the timbers rest on the side walls, and as they are positioned, a small feather with a piece of cotton string tied to it (nakwakwoci) is placed under each one. Sturdy poles with the bark removed are laid at right angles to the timbers, leaving slight spaces between them. Near the center of the kiva, two short timbers are laid across the main beams about 5 feet apart to create a space of 5 by 7 feet for the hatchway, which has stone walls set in mud plaster, supported by the two central beams and the side pieces. This wall or combing rises to at least 18 inches above the finished roof level. On top of the poles covering the rest of the roof, willows and straight twigs of any kind are laid closely together, and a layer of dry grass is arranged in neat rows over them. Mud is then carefully spread over the grass to about 3 inches deep, and once it has dried somewhat, it is smoothed over to fill any cracks. Finally, a layer of dry earth is spread over everything and compacted to make the roof water-tight and even with the surrounding ground, following the same techniques used in building houses.
121 Short timbers are placed across the top of the hatchway wall, one end of which is raised higher than the other, so as to form a slope, and upon these timbers stone slabs are closely laid for a cover. (See Pl. LXXXVII.) An open space, usually about 2 by 4½ feet, is preserved, and this is the only outlet in the structure, serving at once as doorway, window, and chimney.
121 Short beams are laid across the top of the hatchway wall, with one end raised higher than the other to create a slope. On top of these beams, stone slabs are tightly laid for a cover. (See Pl. 87.) An open space, usually about 2 by 4½ feet, is kept clear, and this serves as the only exit in the structure, functioning as a doorway, window, and chimney at the same time.
The roof being finished, a floor of stone flags is laid; but this is never in a continuous level, for at one end it is raised as a platform some 10 or 12 inches high, extending for about a third of the length of the kiva and terminating in an abrupt step just before coming under the hatchway, as illustrated in the ground plan of the mungkiva of Shupaulovi (Fig. 22, and also in Figs. 25 and 27). On the edge of the platform rests the foot of a long ladder, which leans against the higher side of the hatchway, and its tapering ends project 10 or 12 feet in the air. Upon this platform the women and other visitors sit when admitted to witness any of the ceremonies observed in the kiva. The main floor in a few of the kivas is composed of roughly hewn planks, but this is a comparatively recent innovation, and is not generally deemed desirable, as the movement of the dancers on the wooden floor shakes the fetiches out of position.
Once the roof is done, a floor made of stone slabs is laid down; however, it's never completely level. At one end, it rises to form a platform about 10 or 12 inches high, stretching for roughly a third of the kiva's length and ending with a sudden step just before reaching the hatchway, as shown in the ground plan of the mungkiva of Shupaulovi (Fig. 22, and also in Figs. 25 and 27). A long ladder rests on the edge of the platform, leaning against the higher side of the hatchway, with its ends reaching about 10 or 12 feet into the air. Women and other visitors sit on this platform when they are allowed to witness any of the ceremonies held in the kiva. In some kivas, the main floor consists of roughly cut planks, but this is a relatively new change and is not usually preferred, as the dancers' movements on the wooden floor cause the fetiches to shift out of place.
Fig. 22. Ground plan of the chief kiva of Shupaulovi.
Fig. 22. Floor plan of the main kiva of Shupaulovi.
On the lower or main floor a shallow pit of varying dimensions, but usually about a foot square, is made for a fireplace, and is located immediately under the opening in the hatchway. The intention in raising the hatchway above the level of the roof and in elevating the ceiling in the middle is to prevent the fire from igniting them. The ordinary fuel used in the kiva is greasewood, and there are always several bundles of the shrub in its green state suspended on pegs driven in the wall of the hatchway directly over the fire. This shrub, when green, smolders and emits a dense, pungent smoke, but when perfectly dry, burns with a bright, sparkling flame.
On the main floor, there's a shallow pit of different sizes, usually about a foot square, made for a fireplace, and it's located right under the opening in the hatchway. The purpose of raising the hatchway above the roof level and lifting the middle ceiling is to keep the fire from catching them on fire. The typical fuel used in the kiva is greasewood, and there are always several bundles of the shrub in its green state hanging on pegs driven into the wall of the hatchway directly above the fire. This shrub, when green, smolders and produces a thick, strong-smelling smoke, but when it's completely dry, it burns with a bright, sparkling flame.
Across the end of the kiva on the main floor a ledge of masonry is built, usually about 2 feet high and 1 foot wide, which serves as a shelf for the display of fetiches and other paraphernalia during stated observances (see Fig. 22). A small, niche-like aperture is made in the middle of this ledge, and is called the katchin kihu (katchina house). During a festival certain masks are placed in it when not in use by the dancers. Some of the kivas have low ledges built along one or both sides for use as seats, and some have none, but all except two or three have the ledge at the end containing the katchina house.
Across the end of the kiva on the main floor, there’s a masonry ledge built, usually about 2 feet high and 1 foot wide, which acts as a shelf for displaying fetishes and other items during specific ceremonies (see Fig. 22). A small, niche-like opening is created in the middle of this ledge, known as the katchin ki hu (katchina house). During a festival, certain masks are placed there when they're not being used by the dancers. Some kivas have low ledges along one or both sides for seating, while others do not, but all except two or three have the ledge at the end that includes the katchina house.
In the main floor of the kiva there is a cavity about a foot deep and 8 or 10 inches across, which is usually covered with a short, thick slab of cottonwood, whose upper surface is level with the floor. Through the middle of this short plank and immediately over the cavity a hole of 2 or 2½ inches in diameter is bored. This hole is tapered, and is accurately fitted with a movable wooden plug, the top of which is flush with the surface of the plank. The plank and cavity usually occupy a position 122 in the main floor near the end of the kiva. This feature is the sipapuh, the place of the gods, and the most sacred portion of the ceremonial chamber. Around this spot the fetiches are set during a festival; it typifies also the first world of the Tusayan genesis and the opening through which the people first emerged. It is frequently so spoken of at the present time.
In the main floor of the kiva, there’s a shallow cavity about a foot deep and 8 to 10 inches wide, which is usually covered with a short, thick piece of cottonwood, the top of which is level with the floor. There's a hole about 2 or 2½ inches in diameter drilled through the center of this plank right above the cavity. This hole is tapered and fits a movable wooden plug that sits flush with the surface of the plank. The plank and cavity are typically located near the end of the kiva. 122 This feature is called the sipapuh, the place of the gods, and it’s the most sacred part of the ceremonial chamber. During festivals, fetiches are placed around this spot; it also represents the first world of the Tusayan creation story and the opening through which the people first emerged. It’s still commonly referred to this way today.
Other little apertures or niches are constructed in the side walls; they usually open over the main floor of the kiva near the edge of the dais that forms the second level, that upon which the foot of the ladder rests. These are now dedicated to any special purpose, but are used as receptacles for small tools and other ordinary articles. In early days, however, these niches were used exclusively as receptacles for the sacred pipes and tobacco and other smaller paraphernalia.
Other small openings or niches are built into the side walls; they typically open over the main floor of the kiva near the edge of the platform that serves as the second level, where the foot of the ladder rests. These are now reserved for any specific purpose, but are used to store small tools and other everyday items. In the past, however, these niches were solely used to hold sacred pipes, tobacco, and other smaller items.
Fig. 23. Ceiling plan of the chief kiva of Shupaulovi.
Fig. 23. Ceiling plan of the main kiva of Shupaulovi.
In order to make clearer the relative positions of the various features of kiva construction that have been described several typical examples are here illustrated. The three ground plans given are drawn to scale and represent kivas of average dimensions. Mr. Stephen has made a series of typical kiva measurements, which is appended to this section, and comparison of these with the plans will show the relation of the examples selected to the usual dimensions of these rooms. Fig. 22 is the ground plan of the mungkiva, or chief kiva, of Shupaulovi. It will be observed that the second level of the kiva floor, forming the dais before referred to, is about 15 inches narrower on each side than the main floor. The narrowing of this portion of the kiva floor is not universal and does not seem to be regulated by any rule. Sometimes the narrowing is carried out on one side only, as in the mungkiva of Mashongnavi (Fig. 27), sometimes on both, as in the present example, 123 and in other cases it is absent. In the second kiva of Shupaulovi, illustrated in Fig. 25, there is only one small jog that has been built midway along the wall of the upper level and it bears no relation to the point at which the change of floor level occurs. The ledge, or dais, is free for the use of spectators, the Indians say, just as the women stand on the house terraces to witness a dance, and do not step into the court. The ledge in this case is about a foot above the main floor. Benches of masonry are built along each side, though, as the plan shows, they are not of the same length. The bench on the eastern side is about 4 feet shorter than the other, which is cut off by a continuation of the high bench that contains the katchinkihu beyond the corner of the room. These side benches are for the use of participants in the ceremonies. When young men are initiated into the various societies during the feasts in the fall of the year they occupy the floor of the sacred division of the kiva, while the old members of the order occupy the benches along the wall. The higher bench at the end of the room is used as a shelf for paraphernalia. The hole, or recess, in this bench, whose position is indicated by the dotted lines on the plan, is the sacred orifice from which the katchina is said to come, and is called the katchinkihu. In the floor of the kiva, near the katchinkihu, is the sipapuh, the cottonwood plug set into a cottonwood slab over a cavity in the floor. The plan shows how this plank, about 18 inches wide and 6½ feet long, has been incorporated into the paving of the main floor. The paving is composed of some quite large slabs of sandstone whose irregular edges have been skillfully fitted to form a smooth and well finished pavement. The position of the niches that form pipe receptacles is shown on the plan opposite the fireplace in each side wall. The position of the foot of the ladder is indicated, the side poles resting upon the paved surface of the second level about 15 inches from the edge of the step. Fig. 23 gives a ceiling plan of the same kiva, illustrating the arrangement 124 of such of the roof beams and sticks as are visible from inside. The plan shows the position of the four Spanish beams before referred to, the northernmost being the one that has the line and dot decoration. The next two beams, laid in contact, are also square and of Spanish make. The fourth Spanish beam is on the northern edge of the hatchway dome and supports its wall. The adjoining beam is round and of native workmanship. The position and dimensions of the large hatchway projection are here indicated in plan, but the general appearance of this curious feature of the Tusayan kiva can be better seen from the interior view (Fig. 24). Various uses are attributed to this domelike structure, aside from the explanation that it is built at a greater height in order to lessen the danger of ignition of the roof beams. The old men say that formerly they smoked and preserved meat in it. Others say it was used for drying bundles of wood by suspension over the fire preparatory to use in the fireplace. It is also said to constitute an upper chamber to facilitate the egress of smoke, and doubtless it aids in the performance of this good office.
To clarify the layout of the various features of kiva construction that have been described, several typical examples are illustrated here. The three ground plans provided are to scale and represent kivas of average size. Mr. Stephen has compiled a series of standard kiva measurements, which is included in this section, and comparing these with the plans will show how the selected examples relate to the usual sizes of these rooms. Fig. 22 is the ground plan of the mungkiva, or main kiva, of Shupaulovi. It can be noted that the second level of the kiva floor, forming the dais mentioned earlier, is about 15 inches narrower on each side than the main floor. This narrowing of the kiva floor isn’t consistent and doesn’t seem to follow any specific rule. Sometimes it occurs on just one side, as in the mungkiva of Mashongnavi (Fig. 27), or on both sides, as in this example, 123 and in other cases, it may not be present at all. In the second kiva of Shupaulovi, shown in Fig. 25, there is only a small jog built halfway along the wall of the upper level, which has no relation to where the floor level changes. The ledge, or dais, is reserved for spectators, much like how women stand on the house terraces to watch a dance without stepping into the courtyard. In this case, the ledge is about a foot higher than the main floor. Masonry benches are constructed along each side, although, as the plan indicates, they are not the same length. The bench on the eastern side is about 4 feet shorter than the other one, which is interrupted by a continuation of the high bench containing the katchinkihu beyond the room's corner. These side benches are for the participants in the ceremonies. When young men are initiated into various societies during the fall feasts, they take the floor of the kiva's sacred division, while the older members sit on the benches along the walls. The higher bench at the end of the room serves as a shelf for supplies. The hole, or recess, in this bench, marked by dotted lines on the plan, is the sacred opening from which the katchina is said to emerge, called the katchinkihu. In the kiva floor, near the katchinkihu, is the sipapuh, a cottonwood plug placed into a cottonwood slab covering a cavity in the floor. The plan illustrates how this plank, approximately 18 inches wide and 6½ feet long, has been integrated into the main floor's paving. The paving consists of large sandstone slabs whose irregular edges have been expertly fitted to create a smooth, polished surface. The plan shows the positions of niches that serve as pipe receptacles opposite the fireplace in each side wall. The placement of the ladder's foot is indicated, with the side poles resting on the paved surface of the second level about 15 inches from the edge of the step. Fig. 23 provides a ceiling plan of the same kiva, showcasing the arrangement 124 of the visible roof beams and sticks from inside. The plan marks the location of the four Spanish beams previously mentioned, with the northernmost one having line and dot decorations. The next two beams, positioned together, are also square and of Spanish origin. The fourth Spanish beam is located on the northern edge of the hatchway dome and supports its wall. The adjacent beam is round and of local craftsmanship. The position and size of the large hatchway projection are indicated on the plan, but the overall appearance of this unique feature of the Tusayan kiva can be better appreciated from the interior view (Fig. 24). Various purposes are attributed to this dome-like structure, aside from the explanation that it is built at a greater height to reduce the risk of igniting the roof beams. The elders say that in the past, they used it for smoking and preserving meat. Others claim it was used for drying bundles of wood by hanging them over the fire before use in the fireplace. It is also said to serve as an upper chamber to help smoke escape, which it likely does effectively.
Fig. 24. Interior view of a Tusayan kiva.
Fig. 24. Inside view of a Tusayan kiva.
The mud plaster that has been applied directly to the stone work of the interior of this kiva is very much blackened by smoke. From about half of the wall space the plaster has fallen or scaled off, and the exposed 125 stonework is much blackened as though the kiva had long been used with the wall in this uncovered condition.
The fireplace is simply a shallow pit about 18 inches square that is placed directly under the opening of the combined hatchway and smoke hole. It is usually situated from 2 to 3 feet from the edge of the second level of the kiva floor. The paving stones are usually finished quite neatly and smoothly where their edges enframe the firepit.
The fireplace is just a shallow pit about 18 inches square that's positioned directly under the opening of the combined hatchway and smoke hole. It's typically located 2 to 3 feet from the edge of the second level of the kiva floor. The paving stones are usually polished and smooth where their edges frame the firepit.
Fig. 25. Ground plan of a Shupaulovi kiva.
Fig. 25. Floor plan of a Shupaulovi kiva.
Figs. 25 and 26 illustrate the ground and ceiling plans of the second kiva of the same village. In all essential principles of arrangement it is identical with the preceding example, but minor modifications will be noticed in several of the features. The bench at the katchina, or “altar” end of the kiva, has not the height that was seen in the mungkiva, but is on the same level as the benches of the sides. Here the 126 sipapuh is at much greater distance than usual from the katchina recess. It is also quite exceptional in that the plug is let into an orifice in one of the paving stones, as shown on the plan, instead of into a cottonwood plank. Some of the paving stones forming the floor of this kiva are quite regular in shape and of unusual dimensions, one of them being nearly 5 feet long and 2 feet wide. The gray polish of long continued use imparts to these stones an appearance of great hardness. The ceiling plan of this kiva (Fig. 26) shows a single specimen of Spanish beam at the extreme north end of the roof. It also shows a forked “viga” or ceiling beam, which is quite unusual.
Figs. 25 and 26 illustrate the ground and ceiling plans of the second kiva of the same village. In all essential principles of arrangement, it is identical to the previous example, but you'll notice some minor changes in several features. The bench at the katchina, or “altar” end of the kiva, is not as high as the one seen in the mungkiva; instead, it is level with the benches on the sides. Here, the 126 sipapuh is much farther away than usual from the katchina recess. It's also quite unique in that the plug is set into an opening in one of the paving stones, as shown in the plan, rather than into a cottonwood plank. Some of the paving stones making up the floor of this kiva are fairly regular in shape and unusual in size, with one of them measuring nearly 5 feet long and 2 feet wide. The gray polish from long-term use gives these stones a very hard appearance. The ceiling plan of this kiva (Fig. 26) shows a single specimen of Spanish beam at the far north end of the roof. It also features a forked “viga” or ceiling beam, which is quite rare.
Fig. 26. Ceiling plan of a Shupaulovi kiva.
Fig. 26. Ceiling plan of a Shupaulovi kiva.
This kiva is better plastered than the mungkiva and shows in places evidences of many successive coats. The general rule of applying the interior plastering of the kiva on a base of masonry has been violated in this example. The north end and part of the adjoining sides have been brought to an even face by filling in the inequalities of the excavation with reeds which are applied in a vertical position and are held in place by long, slender, horizontal rods, forming a rude matting or wattling. The rods are fastened to the rocky wall at favorable points by means of small prongs of some hard wood, and the whole of the primitive lathing is then thickly plastered with adobe mud. Mr. Stephen found the Ponobi kiva of Oraibi treated in the same manner. The walls are lined with a reed lathing over which mud is plastered. The reed used is the Bakabi (Phragmites communis) whose stalks vary from a quarter of an inch to three-quarters of an inch in diameter. In this instance the reeds are also laid vertically, but they are applied to the ordinary mud-laid kiva wall and not directly to the sides of the natural excavation. The vertical laths are bound in place by horizontal reeds laid upon them 1 or 2 feet apart. The horizontal reeds 127 are held in place by pegs of greasewood driven into the wall at intervals of 1 or 2 feet and are tied to the pegs with split yucca. These specimens are very interesting examples of aboriginal lathing and plastering applied to stone work.
This kiva is better plastered than the mungkiva and shows signs of many layers in some areas. The typical method of applying interior plaster to a masonry base has not been followed here. The north end and part of the adjacent sides have been evened out by filling in the irregularities of the excavation with reeds positioned vertically, held in place by long, thin horizontal rods, creating a sort of matting or wattling. The rods are secured to the rocky wall at suitable points with small prongs made of hard wood, and the entire primitive lathing is then heavily plastered with adobe mud. Mr. Stephen found the Ponobi kiva of Oraibi treated the same way. The walls are lined with reed lathing over which mud is plastered. The reed used is Bakabi (Phragmites communis), whose stalks range from a quarter inch to three-quarters of an inch in diameter. In this case, the reeds are also laid vertically, but they are attached to the typical mud-laid kiva wall rather than directly to the sides of the natural excavation. The vertical laths are secured with horizontal reeds placed 1 or 2 feet apart. The horizontal reeds 127 are anchored by greasewood pegs driven into the wall at intervals of 1 or 2 feet and are tied to the pegs with split yucca. These examples are fascinating instances of Indigenous lathing and plastering applied to stonework.
Fig. 27. Ground plan of the chief kiva of Mashongnavi.
Fig. 27. Floor plan of the main kiva of Mashongnavi.
The ground plan of the mungkiva of Mashongnavi is illustrated in Fig. 27. In this example the narrowing of the room at the second level of the floor is on one side. The step by which the upper level is reached from the main floor is 8 inches high at the east end, rising to 10 inches at the west end. The south end of the kiva is provided with a small opening like a loop-hole, furnishing an outlook to the south. The east side of the main portion of the kiva is not provided with the usual bench. The portion of the bench at the katchina end of the kiva is on a level with the west bench and continuous for a couple of feet beyond the northeast corner along the east wall. The small wall niches are on the west side and nearer the north end than usual. The arrangement of the katchinkihu is quite different from that described in the Shupaulovi kivas. The orifice occurs in the north wall at a height of 3½ feet above the floor, and 2 feet 3 inches above the top of the bench that extends across this end of the room. The firepit is somewhat smaller than in the other examples illustrated. Fig. 28 illustrates the appearance of the kiva hatchway from within as seen from the north end of the kiva, but the ladder has been omitted from the drawing to avoid confusion. The ladder rests against the edge of the coping that caps the dwarf wall on the near side of the hatchway, its top leaning toward the spectator. The small smoke-blackened sticks that are used for the suspension of bundles of greasewood and other fuel in the hatchway are clearly shown. At the far end of the trapdoor, on the outside, is indicated the mat of reeds or rushes that is used for closing the openings when necessary. It is here shown rolled up at the foot of the slope of the hatchway top, its customary position when not in use. 128 When this mat is used for closing the kiva opening it is usually held in place by several large stone slabs laid over it. Fig. 29 illustrates a specimen of the Tusayan kiva mat.
The ground plan of the mungkiva of Mashongnavi is illustrated in Fig. 27. In this example, the room narrows on one side at the second level of the floor. The step leading to the upper level from the main floor is 8 inches high at the east end and rises to 10 inches at the west end. The south end of the kiva has a small opening like a loophole, providing a view to the south. The east side of the main part of the kiva doesn't have the usual bench. The section of the bench at the katchina end of the kiva is level with the west bench and continues for a couple of feet beyond the northeast corner along the east wall. The small wall niches are on the west side and closer to the north end than normal. The arrangement of the katchinkihu is quite different from what is described in the Shupaulovi kivas. The opening is in the north wall, 3½ feet above the floor and 2 feet 3 inches above the top of the bench that runs across this end of the room. The firepit is somewhat smaller than in the other examples shown. Fig. 28 illustrates what the kiva hatchway looks like from inside, as seen from the north end of the kiva, but the ladder has been left out of the drawing to prevent confusion. The ladder leans against the edge of the coping that caps the low wall on the near side of the hatchway, with its top tilted towards the viewer. The small smoke-blackened sticks used to hang bundles of greasewood and other fuel in the hatchway are clearly shown. At the far end of the trapdoor, outside, is the mat of reeds or rushes used to seal the openings when needed. It's depicted rolled up at the bottom of the slope of the hatchway top, its usual position when not in use. 128 When this mat is used to close the kiva opening, it’s typically held in place by several large stone slabs placed on top. Fig. 29 illustrates a sample of the Tusayan kiva mat.
Fig. 28. Interior view of a kiva hatchway in Tusayan.
Fig. 28. Inside view of a kiva hatch in Tusayan.
The above kiva plans show that each of the illustrated examples is provided with four long narrow planks, set in the kiva floor close to the 129 wall and provided with orifices for the attachment of looms. This feature is a common accompaniment of kiva construction and pertains to the use of the ceremonial room as a workshop by the male blanket weavers of Tusayan. It will be more fully described in the discussion of the various uses of the kiva.
The kiva plans above show that each of the examples includes four long, narrow planks placed in the kiva floor near the wall and equipped with openings for attaching looms. This feature is a typical part of kiva construction and relates to the use of the ceremonial room as a workspace for the male blanket weavers of Tusayan. It will be discussed in more detail when we talk about the different uses of the kiva.
Fig. 29. Mat used in closing the entrance of Tusayan kiva.
Fig. 29. Mat used to close the entrance of the Tusayan kiva.
The essential structural features of the kivas above described are remarkably similar, though the illustrations of types have been selected at random. Minor modifications are seen in the positions of many of the features, but a certain general relation between the various constructional requirements of the ceremonial room is found to prevail throughout all the villages.
The key structural features of the kivas described above are surprisingly similar, even though the types shown were chosen randomly. There are slight variations in the arrangement of many features, but a common relationship among the different construction needs of the ceremonial room is evident across all the villages.
Work by women.—After all the above described details have been provided for, following the completion of the roofs and floors, the women belonging to the people who are to occupy the kiva continue the labor of its construction. They go over the interior surface of the walls, breaking off projections and filling up the interstices with small stones, and then they smoothly plaster the walls and the inside of the hatchway with mud, and sometimes whitewash them with a gypsiferous clay found in the neighborhood. Once every year, at the feast of Powuma (the fructifying moon), the women give the kiva this same attention.
Work by women.—After all the details mentioned above have been taken care of, and after the roofs and floors are done, the women from the community that will use the kiva continue the construction work. They go over the inside walls, removing any bumps and filling in the gaps with small stones, then they smooth out the walls and the inside of the hatchway with mud, and sometimes they whitewash them with a clay that contains gypsum found nearby. Once a year, during the Powuma festival (the fertilizing moon), the women give the kiva the same care.
Consecration.—When all the work is finished the kiva chief prepares a baho and “feeds the house,” as it is termed; that is, he thrusts a little meal, with piki crumbs, over one of the roof timbers, and in the same place inserts the end of the baho. As he does this he expresses his hope that the roof may never fall and that sickness and other evils may never enter the kiva.
Consecration.—Once all the work is done, the kiva chief prepares a baho and “feeds the house,” as they say; that means he sprinkles a bit of meal, along with some piki crumbs, over one of the roof beams, and in the same spot, he puts the end of the baho. While doing this, he expresses his wish that the roof will never collapse and that illness and other misfortunes will never come into the kiva.
It is difficult to elicit intelligent explanation of the theory of the baho and the prayer ceremonies in either kiva or house construction. The baho is a prayer token; the petitioner is not satisfied by merely speaking or singing his prayer, he must have some tangible thing upon which to transmit it. He regards his prayer as a mysterious, impalpable portion of his own substance, and hence he seeks to embody it in some object, which thus becomes consecrated. The baho, which is inserted in the roof of the kiva, is a piece of willow twig about six inches long, stripped of its bark and painted. From it hang four small feathers suspended by short cotton strings tied at equal distances along the twig. In order to obtain recognition from the powers especially addressed, different colored feathers and distinct methods of attaching them to bits of wood and string are resorted to. In the present case these are addressed to the “chiefs” who control the paths taken by the people after coming up from the interior of the earth. They are thus designated:
It’s tough to get a clear explanation of the theory behind the baho and the prayer ceremonies in either kiva or house construction. The baho is a prayer token; the person praying isn’t satisfied just by saying or singing their prayer; they need something physical to connect it to. They see their prayer as a mysterious, intangible part of themselves, so they want to put it into an object, which then becomes sacred. The baho, which is placed in the roof of the kiva, is a piece of willow twig about six inches long, stripped of bark and painted. Hanging from it are four small feathers attached by short cotton strings tied at equal distances along the twig. To gain acknowledgment from the powers they are addressing, they use different colored feathers and specific methods of attaching them to pieces of wood and string. In this case, these are directed to the “chiefs” who oversee the paths taken by people when they come up from the earth. They are designated as follows:
To the west: Siky´ak | oma´uwu | Yellow Cloud. |
To thesouth: Sa´kwa | oma´uwu | Blue Cloud. |
To theeast: Pal´a | oma´uwu | Red Cloud. |
To thenorth: Kwetsh | oma´uwu | White Cloud. |
130 Two separate feathers are also attached to the roof. These are addressed to the zenith, héyap omáuwu—the invisible space of the above—and to the nadir, Myuingwa—god of the interior of the earth and maker of the germ of life. To the four first mentioned the bahos under the corner stones are also addressed. These feathers are prepared by the kiva chief in another kiva. He smokes devoutly over them, and as he exhales the smoke upon them he formulates the prayers to the chiefs or powers, who not only control the paths or lives of all the people, but also preside over the six regions of space whence come all the necessaries of life. The ancients also occupy his thoughts during these devotions; he desires that all the pleasures they enjoyed while here may come to his people, and he reciprocally wishes the ancients to partake of all the enjoyments of the living.
130 Two separate feathers are also attached to the roof. These are directed toward the zenith, héyap omáuwu—the invisible space above—and the nadir, Myuingwa—god of the earth's interior and creator of the germ of life. The four previously mentioned are also addressed by the bahos under the corner stones. These feathers are prepared by the kiva chief in another kiva. He devoutly smokes over them, and as he exhales the smoke, he offers prayers to the chiefs or powers, who not only govern the paths or lives of all the people but also oversee the six regions of space from which all necessities of life arrive. The ancients also occupy his thoughts during these devotions; he wishes for all the pleasures they experienced here to come to his people, and he hopes that the ancients will enjoy all the delights of the living in return.
All the labor and ceremonies being completed the women prepare food for a feast. Friends are invited, and the men dance all night in the kiva to the accompaniment of their own songs and the beating of a primitive drum, rejoicing over their new home. The kiva chief then proclaims the name by which the kiva will be known. This is often merely a term of his choosing, often without reference to its appropriateness.
All the work and ceremonies finished, the women get ready food for a feast. They invite friends, and the men dance all night in the kiva with their own songs and the beat of a simple drum, celebrating their new home. The kiva chief then announces the name that the kiva will be known by. This is usually just a name he picks, often with no regard for how fitting it is.
Various uses of kivas.—Allusions occur in some of the traditions, suggesting that in earlier times one class of kiva was devoted wholly to the purposes of a ceremonial chamber, and was constantly occupied by a priest. An altar and fetiches were permanently maintained, and appropriate groups of these fetiches were displayed from month to month, as the different priests of the sacred feasts succeeded each other, each new moon bringing its prescribed feast.
Various uses of kivas.—References can be found in some traditions, indicating that in the past, one type of kiva was solely used as a ceremonial chamber, and was always occupied by a priest. An altar and fetishes were kept there permanently, and specific groups of these fetishes were showcased each month, as the various priests for the sacred feasts took their turns, with each new moon marking its designated feast.
Many of the kivas were built by religious societies, which still hold their stated observances in them, and in Oraibi several still bear the names of the societies using them. A society always celebrates in a particular kiva, but none of these kivas are now preserved exclusively for religious purposes; they are all places of social resort for the men, especially during the winter, when they occupy themselves with the arts common among them. The same kiva thus serves as a temple during a sacred feast, at other times as a council house for the discussion of public affairs. It is also used as a workshop by the industrious and as a lounging place by the idle.
Many of the kivas were constructed by religious groups, which still conduct their rituals in them, and in Oraibi, several still carry the names of the groups that use them. Each group always celebrates in a specific kiva, but none of these kivas are now kept solely for religious use; they are all social gathering spots for men, especially during winter, when they engage in the crafts common to them. The same kiva thus serves as a temple during a sacred festival, at other times as a meeting place for discussing community matters. It's also used as a workshop by those who work hard and as a hangout for those who are less active.
![]() |
Fig. 30.
Rectangular sipapuh in a Mashongnavi kiva. |
There are still traces of two classes of kiva, marked by the distinction that only certain ones contain the sipapuh, and in these the more important ceremonies are held. It is said that no sipapuh has been made recently. The prescribed operation is performed by the chief and the assistant priests or fetich keepers of the society owning the kiva. Some say the mystic lore pertaining to its preparation is lost and none can now be made. It is also said that a stone sipapuh was formerly used instead of the cottonwood plank now commonly seen. The use of stone for this purpose, however, is nearly obsolete, though the second 131 kiva of Shupaulovi, illustrated in plan in Fig. 25, contains an example of this ancient form. In one of the newest kivas of Mashongnavi the plank of the sipapuh is pierced with a square hole, which is cut with a shoulder, the shoulder supporting the plug with which the orifice is closed (see Fig. 30). This is a decided innovation on the traditional form, as the orifice from which the people emerged, which is symbolized in the sipapuh, is described as being of circular form in all the versions of the Tusayan genesis myth. The presence of the sipapuh possibly at one time distinguished such kivas as were considered strictly consecrated to religious observances from those that were of more general use. At Tusayan, at the present time, certain societies do not meet in the ordinary kiva but in an apartment of a dwelling house, each society having its own exclusive place of meeting. The house so used is called the house of the “Sister of the eldest brother,” meaning, probably, that she is the descendant of the founder of the society. This woman’s house is also called the “house of grandmother,” and in it is preserved the tiponi and other fetiches of the society. The tiponi is a ceremonial object about 18 inches long, consisting of feathers set upright around a small disk of silicified wood, which serves as its base when set upon the altar. This fetich is also called iso (grandmother), hence the name given to the house where it is kept. In the house, where the order of warriors (Kuleataka) meets, the eldest son of the woman who owns it is the chief of the order. The apartment in which they meet is a low room on the ground floor, and is entered only by a hatchway and ladder. There is no sipapuh in this chamber, for the warriors appeal directly to Cótukinungwa, the heart of the zenith, the sky god. Large figures of animal fetiches are painted in different colors upon the walls. On the west wall is the Mountain Lion; on the south, the Bear; on the east, the Wild Cat, surmounted with a shield inclosing a star; on the north, the White Wolf; and on the east side of this figure is painted a large disk, representing the sun. The walls of the chambers of the other societies are not decorated permanently. Here is, then, really another class of kiva, although it is not so called by the people on the Walpi mesa. The ordinary term for the ground story rooms is used, “kikoli,” the house without any opening in its walls. But on the second mesa, and at Oraibi, although they sometimes use this term kikoli, they commonly apply the term “kiva” to the ground story of the dwelling house used as well as to the underground chambers.
There are still signs of two types of kiva, distinguished by the fact that only some have the sipapuh, where the more significant ceremonies take place. It’s said that no sipapuh has been created recently. The ritual is performed by the chief and the assistant priests or fetich keepers of the society that owns the kiva. Some claim that the mystical knowledge required to prepare it is lost, and no one can make one now. It’s also said that a stone sipapuh was used in the past instead of the cottonwood plank commonly seen today. However, the use of stone for this purpose is almost gone, though the second kiva of Shupaulovi, shown in the floor plan in Fig. 25, has an example of this old style. In one of the newest kivas of Mashongnavi, the sipapuh plank is pierced with a square hole, cut with a shoulder to support the plug used to close the opening (see Fig. 30). This is a significant innovation on the traditional design, as the opening from which people emerged, symbolized in the sipapuh, is described as circular in all versions of the Tusayan genesis myth. The presence of the sipapuh once likely differentiated kivas strictly reserved for religious practices from those used more generally. Currently, in Tusayan, some societies do not meet in the ordinary kiva but in a room of a house, with each society having its own exclusive meeting place. The house used is referred to as the house of the “Sister of the eldest brother,” which likely means she is a descendant of the society’s founder. This woman’s house is also known as the “house of grandmother,” where the tiponi and other fetiches of the society are kept. The tiponi is a ceremonial object about 18 inches long, made of feathers arranged upright around a small disk of silicified wood, which serves as its base when placed on the altar. This fetich is also called iso (grandmother), which explains the name given to the house where it is stored. In the house where the order of warriors (Kuleataka) meets, the eldest son of the woman who owns it is the order's chief. The meeting space is a low room on the ground floor, entered only by a hatchway and ladder. There is no sipapuh in this space, as the warriors directly appeal to Cótukinungwa, the heart of the zenith, the sky god. Large animal fetiches are painted in different colors on the walls. On the west wall is the Mountain Lion; on the south, the Bear; on the east, the Wild Cat, topped with a shield enclosing a star; on the north, the White Wolf; and to the east of this figure is a large disk representing the sun. The walls of other societies' chambers aren't permanently decorated. So, this truly represents another type of kiva, although the people on the Walpi mesa don’t refer to it as such. The common term for ground-level rooms is used, “kikoli,” meaning the house without any openings in its walls. However, on the second mesa and at Oraibi, although they sometimes use the term kikoli, they commonly refer to the ground level of a dwelling house as “kiva,” just like the underground chambers.
It is probable that a class of kivas, not specially consecrated, has
existed from a very early period. The rooms in the dwelling houses have
always been small and dark, and in early times without chimneys.
132
Within such cramped limits it was inconvenient for the men to practice
any of the arts they knew, especially weaving, which could have been
carried on out of doors, as is done still occasionally, but subject to
many interruptions. It is possible that a class of kivas was designed
for such ordinary purposes, though now one type of room seems to answer
all these various uses. In most of the existing kivas there are planks,
in which stout loops are secured, fixed in the floor close to the wall,
for attaching the lower beam of a primitive vertical loom, and
projecting vigas or beams are inserted into the walls at the time of
their construction as a provision for the attachment of the upper loom
poles. The planks or logs to which is attached the lower part of the
loom appear in some cases to be quite carefully worked. They are often
partly buried in the ground and under the edges of adjacent paving
stones in such a manner as to be held in place very securely against the
strain of the tightly stretched warp while the blanket is being made.
Fig. 31.
Loom post
in kiva at Tusayan.
The holes pierced in the upper surface of these logs are very neatly
executed in the manner illustrated in Fig. 31,
which shows one of the orifices in section, together with the adjoining
paving stones. The outward appearance of the device, as seen at short
intervals along the length of the log, is also shown. Strips of buckskin
or bits of rope are passed through these U-shaped cavities, and then
over the lower pole of the loom at the bottom of the extended series of
warp threads. The latter can thus be tightened preparatory to the
operation of filling in with the woof. The kiva looms seem to be used
mainly for weaving the dark-blue and black blankets of diagonal and
diamond pattern, which form a staple article of trade with the Zuni and
the Rio Grande Pueblos. As an additional convenience for the practice of
weaving, one of the kivas of Mashongnavi is provided with movable seats.
These consist simply of single stones of suitable size and form. Usually
they are 8 or 10 inches thick, a foot wide, and perhaps 15 or 18 inches
long. Besides their use as seats, these stones are used in connection
with the edges of the stone slabs that cap the permanent benches of the
kiva to support temporarily the upper and lower poles of the blanket
loom while the warp is gradually wound around them. The large stones
that are incorporated into the side of the benches of some of the
Mashongnavi kivas have occasionally round, cup-shaped cavities, of about
an inch in diameter, drilled into them. These holes receive one end of a
warp stick, the other end, being supported in a corresponding hole of
the heavy, movable stone seat. The other warp stick is supported in a
similar manner, while the thread is passed around both in a horizontal
direction preparatory to placing and stretching it in a vertical
position for the final working of the blanket. A number of these
cup-shaped
133
pits are formed along the side of the stone bench, to provide for
various lengths of warp that may be required. On the opposite side of
this same kiva a number of similar holes or depressions are turned into
the mud plastering of the wall. All these devices are of common
occurrence at other of the Tusayan kivas, and indicate the antiquity of
the practice of using the kivas for such industrial purposes. There is a
suggestion of similar use of the ancient circular kivas in an example in
Canyon de Chelly. At a small cluster of rooms, built partly on a rocky
ledge and partly on adjoining loose earth and rocky debris, a land slide
had carried away half of a circular kiva, exposing a well-defined
section of its floor and the debris within the room. Here the writer
found a number of partly finished sandals of yucca fiber, with the long,
unwoven fiber carefully wrapped about the finished portion of the work,
as though the sandals had been temporarily laid aside until the maker
could again work on them. A number of coils of yucca fiber, similar to
that used in the sandals, and several balls of brown fiber, formed from
the inner bark of the cedar, were found on the floor of the room. The
condition of the ruin and the debris that filled the kiva clearly
suggested that these specimens were in use just where they were found at
the time of the abandonment or destruction of the houses. No traces were
seen, however, of any structural devices like those of Tusayan that
would serve as aids to the weavers, though the weaving of the particular
articles comprised in the collection from this spot would probably not
require any cumbrous apparatus.
It is likely that a type of kiva, not specifically dedicated to any rituals, has been around for a long time. The rooms in the homes have always been small and dark, and in the past, they didn't have chimneys.
132
In such tight spaces, it was difficult for men to practice any of their skills, particularly weaving, which could have been done outdoors, as it sometimes still is, but with many distractions. It’s possible that a type of kiva was meant for these everyday uses, although currently, one style of room seems to serve multiple purposes. In most of the existing kivas, there are planks with sturdy loops attached to the floor near the wall for connecting the lower beam of a basic vertical loom. Also, beams are inserted into the walls during construction to hold the upper loom poles. The planks or logs that support the lower part of the loom appear to be quite well crafted in some cases. They are often partially buried in the ground and under the edges of nearby paving stones, making them secure against the tension of the tightly stretched warp while the blanket is being woven.
Fig. 31.
Loom post
in the kiva at Tusayan.
The holes drilled into the tops of these logs are done neatly, as shown in Fig. 31, which illustrates a section of one of the holes along with the nearby paving stones. The look of the holes, visible at intervals along the log, is also depicted. Strips of buckskin or pieces of rope go through these U-shaped holes and over the lower pole of the loom at the bottom of the stretched warp threads. This allows for tightening the warp before weaving the weft. The kiva looms appear to be mainly used for making dark blue and black blankets with diagonal and diamond patterns, which are a key trade item with the Zuni and the Rio Grande Pueblos. Additionally, one of the kivas in Mashongnavi has movable seats for weaving convenience. These seats are simply single stones of suitable size and shape, usually 8 or 10 inches thick, a foot wide, and about 15 or 18 inches long. Besides serving as seats, these stones are used along with the edges of the stone slabs on the permanent benches of the kiva to temporarily support the upper and lower poles of the blanket loom while the warp is gradually wound around them. Some large stones built into the sides of the benches in some Mashongnavi kivas have round, cup-shaped holes about an inch in diameter drilled into them. These holes hold one end of a warp stick, while the other end is supported in a corresponding hole of the heavy, movable stone seat. The other warp stick is similarly supported, and the thread is passed horizontally around both before they are placed and stretched vertically for the final weaving of the blanket. A series of these cup-shaped
133
pits is created along the side of the stone bench to accommodate different lengths of warp when needed. On the opposite side of this kiva, there are also similar holes or indentations in the mud plastering of the wall. All these features are commonly found in other Tusayan kivas and show the long-established practice of using kivas for practical purposes. There is some evidence suggesting ancient circular kivas were used similarly, as seen in an example from Canyon de Chelly. In a small group of rooms built partly on a rocky ledge and partly on loose earth and debris, a landslide had taken away half of a circular kiva, revealing a well-defined section of its floor and the materials inside. Here, the writer found several half-finished sandals made of yucca fiber, with the long, unwoven fiber carefully wrapped around the completed parts, suggesting they had been set aside temporarily until the maker could return to work on them. Several coils of yucca fiber, similar to that used for the sandals, and a few balls of brown fiber made from cedar bark were found on the floor of the room. The state of the ruin and the debris inside the kiva clearly indicated that these items were in use right where they were found at the time the houses were abandoned or destroyed. However, no signs were found of structural devices like those in Tusayan that would help weavers, although weaving the particular items found at this location likely didn't require any cumbersome equipment.
Kiva ownership.—The kiva is usually spoken of as being the home of the organization which maintains it. Different kivas are not used in common by all the inhabitants. Every man has a membership in some particular one and he frequents that one only. The same person is often a member of different societies, which takes him to different kivas, but that is only on set occasions. There is also much informal visiting among them, but a man presumes to make a loitering place only of the kiva in which he holds membership.
Kiva ownership.—The kiva is generally referred to as the home of the organization that manages it. Different kivas aren't shared by all the residents. Each man belongs to a specific kiva and visits that one exclusively. The same person might also be a member of various societies, leading him to different kivas, but that happens only on designated occasions. There’s also a lot of casual visiting among them, but a man only feels entitled to hang out at the kiva where he is a member.
In each kiva there is a kiva mungwi (kiva chief), and he controls to a great extent all matters pertaining to the kiva and its membership. This office or trust is hereditary and passes from uncle to nephew through the female line—that is, on the death of a kiva chief the eldest son of his eldest sister succeeds him.
In each kiva, there's a kiva chief, known as the kiva mungwi, who has significant control over all matters related to the kiva and its members. This position is hereditary and is passed down from uncle to nephew through the female line—when a kiva chief dies, the eldest son of his oldest sister takes over.
A kiva may belong either to a society, a group of gentes, or an individual. If belonging to a society or order, the kiva chief commonly has inherited his office in the manner indicated from the “eldest brother” of the society who assumed its construction. But the kiva chief is not necessarily chief of the society; in fact, usually he is but an ordinary member. A similar custom of inheritance prevails where the kiva belongs to a group of gentes, only in that case the kiva chief is usually chief of the gentile group.
A kiva can belong to a society, a group of clans, or an individual. If it's part of a society or order, the kiva chief typically inherits the position from the “eldest brother” of the society who was responsible for its construction. However, the kiva chief isn't always the leader of the society; in most cases, he is just a regular member. A similar inheritance practice exists when the kiva belongs to a group of clans, but in that case, the kiva chief usually is the leader of the clan group.
As for those held by individuals, a couple of examples will illustrate the Tusayan practice. In Hano the chief kiva was originally built 134 by a group of “Sun” gentes, but about 45 years ago, during an epidemic of smallpox, all the people who belonged to the kiva died except one man. The room fell into ruin, its roof timbers were carried off, and it became filled up with dust and rubbish. The title to it, however, rested with the old survivor, as all the more direct heirs had died, and he, when about to die, gave the kiva to Kotshve, a “Snake” man from Walpi, who married a Tewa (Hano) woman and still lives in Hano. This man repaired it and renamed it Tokónabi (said to be a Pah-Ute term, meaning black mountain, but it is the only name the Tusayan have for Navajo Mountain) because his people (the “Snake”) came from that place. He in turn gave it to his eldest son, who is therefore kiva mungwi, but the son says his successor will be the eldest son of his eldest sister. The membership is composed of men from all the Hano gentes, but not all of any one gens. In fact, it is not now customary for all the members of a gens to be members of the same kiva.
As for those owned by individuals, a couple of examples will show the Tusayan practice. In Hano, the main kiva was originally built 134 by a group of “Sun” clans, but about 45 years ago, during a smallpox epidemic, all the people associated with the kiva died except for one man. The room fell into disrepair, its roof beams were taken away, and it became filled with dust and debris. However, the ownership remained with the old survivor, since all the direct heirs had passed away. When he was about to die, he gave the kiva to Kotshve, a “Snake” man from Walpi, who married a Tewa (Hano) woman and still lives in Hano. This man fixed it up and renamed it Tokónabi (believed to be a Pah-Ute term meaning black mountain, but this is the only name the Tusayan have for Navajo Mountain) because his people (the “Snake”) came from that area. He then transferred it to his oldest son, who is now the kiva mungwi, but the son says his successor will be the oldest son of his oldest sister. Membership includes men from all the Hano clans, but not all members of any single clan. In fact, it’s no longer common for all members of a clan to belong to the same kiva.
Another somewhat similar instance occurs in Sichumovi. A kiva, abandoned for a long time after the smallpox plague, was taken possession of by an individual, who repaired it and renamed it Kevinyáp tshómo—Oak Mound. He made his friends its members, but he called the kiva his own. He also says that his eldest sister’s son will succeed him as chief.
Another somewhat similar situation happens in Sichumovi. A kiva, which had been abandoned for a long time after the smallpox outbreak, was claimed by someone who fixed it up and renamed it Kevinyáp tshómo—Oak Mound. He made his friends members of it, but he claimed the kiva as his own. He also mentioned that his oldest sister’s son will take over as chief after him.
In each village one of the kivas, usually the largest one, is called (aside from its own special name) mungkiva—chief kiva. It is frequented by the kimungwi—house or village chief—and the tshaakmungwi—chief talker, councillor—and in it also the more elaborate ceremonies are observed.
In each village, one of the kivas, usually the biggest one, is called (besides its specific name) mungkiva—chief kiva. It’s often visited by the kimungwi—house or village chief—and the tshaakmungwi—chief talker, advisor—and this is where the more elaborate ceremonies take place.
No women frequent any of the kivas; in fact they never enter them except to plaster the walls at customary periods, or during the occasion of certain ceremonies. Yet one at least of the Oraibi kivas was built for the observances of a society of women, the Mamzrántiki. This and another female society—Lalénkobáki—exist in all the other villages, and on the occasion of their festivals the women are given the exclusive use of one of the kivas.
No women visit any of the kivas; in fact, they only enter them to plaster the walls during regular times or for certain ceremonies. However, at least one of the Oraibi kivas was built for a women's society, the Mamzrántiki. This and another female society—Lalénkobáki—are found in all the other villages, and during their festivals, the women are given exclusive access to one of the kivas.
Motives for building a kiva.—Only two causes are mentioned for building a new kiva. Quarrels giving rise to serious dissensions among the occupants of a kiva are one cause. An instance of this occurred quite recently at Hano. The conduct of the kiva chief gave rise to dissensions, and the members opposed to him prepared to build a separate room of their own. They chose a gap on the side of the mesa cliff, close to Hano, collected stones for the walls, and brought the roof timbers from the distant wooded mesas; but when all was ready to lay the foundation their differences were adjusted and a complete reconciliation was effected.
Motives for building a kiva.—Only two reasons are noted for constructing a new kiva. One reason is disputes that lead to serious divisions among the members of a kiva. A recent example of this happened at Hano. The behavior of the kiva chief caused disagreements, and the members who opposed him planned to build a separate space for themselves. They picked a spot on the side of the mesa cliff, near Hano, gathered stones for the walls, and transported roof timbers from the faraway wooded mesas; but just when they were about to lay the foundation, their differences were resolved and they fully reconciled.
The other cause assigned is the necessity for additional room when a gens has outgrown its kiva. When a gens has increased in numbers sufficiently to warrant its having a second kiva, the chief of the gentile 135 group, who in this case is also chief of the order, proposes to his kin to build a separate kiva, and that being agreed to, he assumes the direction of the construction and all the dedicatory and other ceremonies connected with the undertaking. An instance of this kind occurred within the last year or two at Oraibi, where the members of the “Katchina” gentes, who are also members of the religious order of Katchina, built a spacious kiva for themselves.
The other reason given is the need for more space when a gens has outgrown its kiva. When a gens has grown large enough to justify having a second kiva, the leader of the gentile 135 group, who is also the head of the order, suggests to his relatives that they build a new kiva. Once they agree, he takes charge of the construction and all the rituals and ceremonies involved in the project. A recent example of this happened in the last couple of years at Oraibi, where the members of the “Katchina” gentes, who are also part of the Katchina religious order, built a large kiva for themselves.
The construction of a new kiva is said to be of rare occurrence. On the other hand, it is common to hear the kiva chief lament the decadence of its membership. In the “Oak Mound” kiva at Sichumovi there are now but four members. The young men have married and moved to their wives’ houses in more thriving villages, and the older men have died. The chief in this case also says that some 2 years ago the agent gave him a stove and pipe, which he set up in the room to add to its comfort. He now has grave fears that the stove is an evil innovation, and has exercised a deleterious influence upon the fortune of his kiva and its members; but the stove is still retained.
The building of a new kiva is said to happen very rarely. However, it’s common to hear the kiva chief express concern about the declining membership. In the “Oak Mound” kiva at Sichumovi, there are now only four members. The young men have married and moved into their wives’ houses in more prosperous villages, while the older men have passed away. The chief also mentions that about two years ago, the agent gave him a stove and pipe, which he installed in the room to make it more comfortable. Now, he fears that the stove is a bad change and has negatively impacted the fortunes of his kiva and its members, but he still keeps the stove.
Significance of structural plan.—The designation of the curious orifice of the sipapuh as “the place from which the people emerged” in connection with the peculiar arrangement of the kiva interior with its change of floor level, suggested to the author that these features might be regarded as typifying the four worlds of the genesis myth that has exercised such an influence on Tusayan customs; but no clear data on this subject were obtained by the writer, nor has Mr. Stephen, who is specially well equipped for such investigations, discovered that a definite conception exists concerning the significance of the structural plan of the kiva. Still, from many suggestive allusions made by the various kiva chiefs and others, he also has been led to infer that it typifies the four “houses,” or stages, described in their creation myths. The sipapuh, with its cavity beneath the floor, is certainly regarded as indicating the place of beginning, the lowest house under the earth, the abode of Myuingwa, the Creator; the main or lower floor represents the second stage; and the elevated section of the floor is made to denote the third stage, where animals were created. Mr. Stephen observed, at the New Year festivals, that animal fetiches were set in groups upon this platform. It is also to be noted that the ladder leading to the surface is invariably made of pine, and always rests upon the platform, never upon the lower floor, and in their traditional genesis it is stated that the people climbed up from the third house (stage) by a ladder of pine, and through such an opening as the kiva hatchway; only most of the stories indicate that the opening was round. The outer air is the fourth world, or that now occupied.
Significance of structural plan.—The description of the curious hole in the sipapuh as “the place from which the people emerged” relates to the unusual layout of the kiva’s interior, particularly its different floor levels. This led the author to think that these aspects might represent the four worlds from the creation myth that significantly influence Tusayan customs. However, the author didn’t gather any clear information on this topic, nor has Mr. Stephen, who is well-prepared for such research, found that a definitive understanding exists regarding the meaning of the kiva's layout. Nevertheless, based on various hints from different kiva chiefs and others, he believes it symbolizes the four “houses” or stages mentioned in their creation myths. The sipapuh, with its space beneath the floor, is certainly seen as representing the point of origin, the lowest house under the earth, the dwelling of Myuingwa, the Creator; the main or lower floor signifies the second stage; and the raised part of the floor represents the third stage, where animals were created. Mr. Stephen noted that during the New Year festivals, animal fetishes were grouped on this platform. It’s also important to mention that the ladder leading to the surface is always made of pine and rests on the platform, never on the lower floor. Their traditional genesis states that the people climbed up from the third house (stage) using a pine ladder and through an opening like the kiva hatchway; however, most stories suggest that this opening was round. The outer air is considered the fourth world, or the one currently inhabited.
There are occasional references in the Tusayan traditions to circular kivas, but these are so confused with fantastic accounts of early mythic structures that their literal rendition would serve no useful purpose in the present discussion.
There are occasional mentions in the Tusayan traditions of circular kivas, but these are so mixed up with incredible stories of ancient mythical structures that explaining them literally wouldn’t be helpful in the current discussion.
136 Typical measurements.—The following list is a record of a number of measurements of Tusayan kivas collected by Mr. Stephen. The wide difference between the end measurements of the same kiva are usually due to the interior offsets that have been noticed on the plans, but the differences in the lengths of the sides are due to irregularities of the site. The latter differences are not so marked as the former.
136 Typical measurements.—The following list is a record of several measurements of Tusayan kivas collected by Mr. Stephen. The significant variation between the final measurements of the same kiva usually results from the interior offsets noted on the plans, while the differences in the lengths of the sides stem from the irregularities of the site. These latter differences are not as pronounced as the former.
Width at ends. | Length of sides. | Height at center. |
Height at ends. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13 6 | —— | 24 0 | —— | 8 6 | —— | —— |
12 0 | —— | 21 9 | —— | 7 6 | 6 6 | —— |
14 6 | 14 6 | 24 6 | 23 3 | 8 0 | 6 6 | 6 6 |
12 2 | 12 11 | 23 9 | 23 9 | 7 10 | 6 1 | 6 0 |
12 6 | 12 6 | 26 0 | 25 3 | 7 6 | 6 6 | 6 6 |
13 4 | 12 10 | 26 8 | 26 7 | 7 10 | 7 0 | 7 0 |
15 0 | 13 6 | 26 6 | 24 11 | 7 4 | 6 3 | 6 2 |
12 6 | 11 5 | 23 7 | 21 9 | 8 0 | 7 0 | 7 0 |
12 5 | 13 5 | 22 8 | 24 1 | 7 3 | 6 1 | 6 9 |
10 6 | 13 6 | 27 0 | 27 0 | 8 3 | 6 3 | 6 2 |
13 6 | 11 6 | 29 9 | 29 0 | 11 0 | 5 11 | —— |
14 6 | —— | 28 6 | 28 6 | 9 8 | 6 0 | —— |
13 2 | 14 0 | 28 9 | 29 9 | 8 6 | 7 0 | 6 4 |
15 1 | 14 0 | 28 6 | —— | 9 6 | 7 3 | 6 6 |
13 0 | 12 6 | 28 7 | 29 6 | —— | 7 4 | 6 3 |
List of Tusayan kivas.—The following list gives the present names of all the kivas in use at Tusayan. The mungkiva or chief kiva of the village is in each case designated:
List of Tusayan kivas.—The following list provides the current names of all the kivas used at Tusayan. The mungkiva or main kiva of the village is noted in each instance:
HANO. | ||
---|---|---|
1. | Toko´nabi kiva | Navajo Mountain. |
2. | Hano sinte´ kiva | Place of the Hano. |
Toko´nabi kiva is the mungkiva. | ||
WALPI. | ||
1. | Djiva´to kiva | Goat. |
2. | Al kiva | A´la, Horn. |
3. | Naca´b kiva | Na´cabi, half-way or central. |
4. | Picku´ibi kiva | Opening oak bud.5 |
Wikwa´lobi kiva | Place of the watchers. | |
5. | Mung kiva | Mungwi chief. |
No. 5 is the mungkiva. | ||
SICHUMOVI. | ||
1. | Bave´ntcomo | Water mound. |
2. | Kwinzaptcomo | Oak mound. |
Bave´ntcomo is the mungkiva. | ||
MASHONGNAVI. | ||
1. | Tcavwu´na kiva | A small coiled-ware jar. |
2. | Hona´n kiva | Honani, Badger, a gens. |
3. | Gy´arzohi kiva | Gy´arzo, Paroquet, a gens. |
4. | Kotcobi kiva | High place. |
5. | Al kiva | A´la, Horn. |
Teavwu´na kiva is the mungkiva. | ||
137 | SHUPAULOVI. | |
1. | A´tkabi kiva | Place below. |
2. | Kokyangobi kiva | Place of spider. |
A´tkabi kiva is the mungkiva. | ||
SHUMOPAVI. | ||
1. | Nuvwa´tikyuobi | High place of snow, San Francisco Mountain. High place of snow, San Francisco Mountain. |
2. | Al kiva | A´la, Horn. |
3. | Gy´arzobi | Gy´arzo, Paroquet, a gens. |
4. | Tco´sobi | Blue Jay, a gens. |
Tco´sobi is the mungkiva. |
ORAIBI. | |||
---|---|---|---|
1. | Tdau kiva | Tda´uollauwuh | The singers. |
2. | Ha´wiobi kiva | Ha´wi, stair; Ha´wi, stair; |
High stair place. |
3. | Ish kiva | Isa´uwuh | Coyote, a gens. |
4. | Kwang kiva | Kwa´kwanti | Religious order. |
5. | Ma´zrau kiva | Ma´mzrauti | Female order. |
6. | Na´cabi kiva | Half way or | Central place. |
7. | Sa´kwalen kiva | Sa´kwa le´na | Blue Flute, a religious order. Blue Flute, a faith group. |
8. | Po´ngobi kiva | Pongo, a circle | An order who decorate themselves with circular marks on the body. An order that decorates themselves with circular marks on their bodies. |
9. | Hano´ kiva | Ha´nomuh | A fashion of cutting the hair. |
10. | Motc kiva | Mo´mtci | The Warriors, an order. |
11. | Kwita´koli kiva | Kwita, ordure; Kwita, waste; |
Ordure heap. |
12. | Katcin kiva | Katcina | A gens. |
13. | Tcu kiva | Tcua, a snake | Religions order. |
Tdau kiva is the mungkiva. |
DETAILS OF TUSAYAN AND CIBOLA CONSTRUCTION.
WALLS.
The complete operation of building a wall has never been observed at
Zuñi by the writer, but a close examination of numerous finished and
some broken-down walls indicates that the methods of construction
adopted are essentially the same as those employed in Tusayan, which,
have been repeatedly observed; with the possible difference, however,
that in the former adobe mud mortar is more liberally used. A singular
feature of pueblo masonry as observed at Tusayan is the very sparing use
of mud in the construction of the walls; in fact, in some instances when
walls are built during the dry season, the larger stones are laid up in
the walls without the use of mud at all, and are allowed to stand in
this condition until the rains come; then the mud mortar is mixed, the
interstices of the walls filled in with it and with chinking stones, and
the inside walls are plastered. But the usual practice is to complete
the house at once, finishing it inside and out with the requisite
mortar. In some instances the outside walls are coated, completely
138
covering the masonry, but this is not done in many of the houses, as may
be seen by reference to the preceding illustrations of the Tusayan
villages. At Zuñi, on the other hand, a liberal and frequently renewed
coating of mud is applied to the walls. Only one piece of masonry was
seen in the entire village that did not have traces of this coating of
mud, viz, that portion of the second story wall of house No. 2 described
as possibly belonging to the ancient nucleus pueblo of Halona and
illustrated in Pl. LVIII. Even the rough masonry of the kivas is
partly surfaced with this medium, though many jagged stones are still
visible. As a result of this practice it is now in many cases impossible
to determine from mere superficial inspection whether the underlying
masonry has been constructed of stone or of adobe; a difficulty that may
be realized from an examination of the views of Zuñi in Chapter III. Where the fall of water, such as the
discharge from a roof-drain, has removed the outer coating of mud that
covers stonework and adobe alike, a large proportion of these exposures
reveal stone masonry, so that it is clearly apparent that Zuñi is
essentially a stone village. The extensive use of sun-dried bricks of
adobe has grown up within quite recent times. It is apparent, however,
that the Zuñi builders preferred to use stone; and even at the present
time they frequently eke out with stonework portions of a house when the
supply of adobe has fallen short. An early instance of such
supplementary use of stone masonry still survives in the church
building, where the old Spanish adobe has been repaired and filled in
with the typical tabular aboriginal masonry, consisting of small stones
carefully laid, with very little intervening mortar showing on the face.
Such reversion to aboriginal methods probably took place on every
opportunity, though it is remarkable that the Indians should have been
allowed to employ their own methods in this instance. Although this
church building has for many generations furnished a conspicuous example
of typical adobe construction to the Zuñi, he has never taken the lesson
sufficiently to heart to closely imitate the Spanish methods either in
the preparation of the material or in the manner of its use. The adobe
bricks of the church are of large and uniform size, and the mud from
which they were made had a liberal admixture of straw. This binding
material does not appear in Zuñi in any other example of adobe that has
been examined, nor does it seem to have been utilized in any of the
native pueblo work either at this place or at Tusayan.
Fig. 32.
A Zuñi chimney,
showing pottery fragments
embedded in its adobe base.
Where molded adobe bricks have been used by the Zuñi in housebuilding
they have been made from the raw material just as it was taken from the
fields. As a result these bricks have little of the durability of the
Spanish work. Pl. XCVI illustrates an adobe wall of Zuñi, part of
an unroofed house. The old adobe church at Hawikuh (Pl. XLVIII),
abandoned for two centuries, has withstood the wear of time and weather
better than any of the stonework of the surrounding houses. On the
right-hand side of the street that shows in the foreground of Pl. LXXVIII is an
illustration of the construction
139
of a wall with adobe bricks. This example is very recent, as it has not
yet been roofed over. The top of the wall, however, is temporarily
protected by the usual series of thin sandstone slabs used in the
finishing of wall copings. The very rapid disintegration of native-made
adobe walls has brought about the use in Zuñi of many protective
devices, some of which will be noticed in connection with the discussion
of roof drains and wall copings. Figs. 32 and 33 illustrate a curious employment of pottery
fragments on a mud-plastered wall and on the base of a chimney to
protect the adobe coating against rapid erosion by the rains. These
pieces, usually fragments from large vessels, are embedded in the adobe
with the convex side out, forming an armor of pottery scales well
adapted to resist disintegration, by the elements.
The entire process of building a wall has never been witnessed at Zuñi by the author, but a thorough look at many completed and some crumbling walls suggests that the construction methods used are basically the same as those seen in Tusayan, which have been frequently observed; with the possible exception that in the former, adobe mud mortar is used more generously. One distinctive aspect of pueblo masonry noted in Tusayan is the minimal use of mud in the wall construction; in fact, sometimes during dry season, the larger stones are put in the walls without any mud at all, and they remain in that state until the rains arrive; then the mud mortar is mixed, the gaps in the walls are filled in with it and with chinking stones, and the inner walls are plastered. However, the normal practice is to finish the house all at once, completing it inside and out with the necessary mortar. In some cases, the outer walls are fully coated, covering the masonry completely, but this isn’t the case for many of the houses, as can be seen in the previous illustrations of the Tusayan villages. At Zuñi, on the other hand, a generous and often refreshed coating of mud is applied to the walls. Only one piece of masonry was observed in the whole village without signs of this mud coating, namely that part of the second-story wall of house No. 2 described as possibly belonging to the ancient nucleus pueblo of Halona and illustrated in Pl. LVIII. Even the rough masonry of the kivas is partly covered with this material, although many rough stones are still visible. Because of this practice, it’s often impossible to tell from a quick inspection whether the underlying masonry is made of stone or adobe; a challenge that can be seen in the views of Zuñi in Chapter III. Where water runoff, like from a roof drain, has stripped away the outer mud covering stonework and adobe alike, many of these exposed areas reveal stone masonry, making it clear that Zuñi is primarily a stone village. The widespread use of sun-dried adobe bricks has developed quite recently. However, it’s clear that the Zuñi builders preferred to use stone; even today, they often supplement parts of a house with stonework when they run low on adobe. An early example of such additional use of stone masonry still exists in the church building, where the old Spanish adobe has been repaired and filled in with typical tabular indigenous masonry, consisting of small stones carefully placed with very little mortar showing on the surface. This return to indigenous methods probably occurred whenever possible, yet it’s striking that the Indians were allowed to use their own techniques in this case. Although this church has served as a prominent model of typical adobe construction to the Zuñi for many generations, they haven’t taken the lesson to heart enough to closely imitate the Spanish methods in either preparing the material or using it. The adobe bricks of the church are large and uniform in size, and the mud used to make them had a plentiful mixture of straw. This binding material does not appear in any other examples of adobe examined in Zuñi, nor does it seem to have been used in any native pueblo work at this site or in Tusayan.
Fig. 32.
A Zuñi chimney,
featuring pottery shards
set within its adobe base.
When molded adobe bricks have been used by the Zuñi in building houses, they have been made from the raw material as it was taken from the fields. Consequently, these bricks lack the durability of the Spanish work. Pl. XCVI shows an adobe wall at Zuñi, part of an unroofed house. The old adobe church at Hawikuh (Pl. XLVIII), abandoned for two centuries, has fared better against the elements than any of the stonework of the nearby houses. On the right side of the street shown in the foreground of Pl. LXXVIII, there is an illustration of a wall constructed with adobe bricks. This example is very new, as it has not yet been roofed. However, the top of the wall is temporarily shielded by the usual series of thin sandstone slabs used for wall copings. The rapid deterioration of locally made adobe walls has led to the use of numerous protective measures in Zuñi, some of which will be discussed in relation to the roof drains and wall copings. Figs. 32 and 33 display a unique use of pottery fragments on a mud-plastered wall and at the base of a chimney to guard the adobe coating against quick erosion from rain. These pieces, usually fragments of large vessels, are embedded in the adobe with the convex side facing out, creating a protective layer of pottery scales that help resist wear from the elements.
Fig. 33. A Zuñi oven with pottery scales embedded in its surface.
Fig. 33. A Zuñi oven with pottery fragments embedded in its surface.
The introduction of the use of adobe in Zuñi should probably be attributed to foreign influence, but the position of the village in the open plain at a distance of several miles from the nearest outcrop of suitable building stone naturally led the builders to use stone more sparingly when an available substitute was found close at hand. The thin slabs of stone, which had to be brought from a great distance, came to be used only for the more exposed portions of buildings, such as copings on walls and borders around roof openings. Still, the pueblo 140 builders never attained to a full appreciation of the advantages and requirements of this medium as compared with stone. The adobe walls are built only as thick as is absolutely necessary, few of them being more than a foot in thickness. The walls are thus, in proportion, to height and weight, sustained, thinner than the crude brick construction of other peoples, and require protection and constant repairs to insure durability. As to thickness, they are evidently modeled directly after the walls of stone masonry, which had already, in both Tusayan and Cibola, been pushed to the limit of thinness. In fact, since the date of the survey of Zuñi, on which the published plan is based, the walls of several rooms over the court passageway in the house, illustrated in Pl. LXXXII, have entirely fallen in, demonstrating the insufficiency of the thin walls to sustain the weight of several stories.
The introduction of adobe in Zuñi likely comes from outside influences, but the village's location in the open plain, several miles away from the nearest source of suitable building stone, naturally made the builders use stone less frequently when they found a close substitute. The thin stone slabs, which had to be transported from far away, were only used for the more exposed parts of buildings, like the edges of walls and around roof openings. However, the pueblo builders never fully understood the benefits and requirements of adobe compared to stone. The adobe walls are built only as thick as necessary, with most being no more than a foot thick. As a result, in relation to their height and weight, these walls are thinner than the rough brick construction of other cultures and need ongoing protection and repairs to remain durable. Their thickness clearly follows the design of stone masonry walls, which had already been pushed to their limit of thinness in both Tusayan and Cibola. In fact, since the survey of Zuñi, on which the published plan is based, the walls of several rooms over the courtyard passageway in the house shown in Pl. LXXXII have completely collapsed, proving that the thin walls are inadequate to support the weight of multiple stories.
The climate of the pueblo region is not wholly suited to the employment of adobe construction, as it is there practiced. For several months in the year (the rainy season) scarcely a day passes without violent storms which play havoc with the earth-covered houses, necessitating constant vigilance and frequent repairs on the part of the occupants.
The climate of the pueblo region isn't entirely ideal for using adobe construction as it's done there. For several months each year (during the rainy season), there are hardly any days without intense storms that wreak havoc on the earth-covered houses, requiring the occupants to stay alert and make frequent repairs.
Though the practice of mud-coating all walls has in Cibola undoubtedly led to greater carelessness and a less rigid adherence to ancient methods of construction, the stone masonry may still be seen to retain some of the peculiarities that characterize ancient examples. Features of this class are still more apparent at Tusayan, and notwithstanding the rudeness of much of the modern stone masonry of this province, the fact that the builders are familiar with the superior methods of the ancient builders, is clearly shown in the masonry of the present villages.
Though the practice of mud-coating all walls in Cibola has definitely resulted in more carelessness and a looser adherence to ancient construction methods, the stonework still shows some distinct traits that define ancient examples. These characteristics are even more evident in Tusayan, and despite the roughness of much of the modern stonework in this area, it's clear that the builders are knowledgeable about the superior techniques used by ancient builders, as shown in the masonry of the current villages.
Perhaps the most noteworthy characteristic of pueblo masonry, and one which is more or less present in both ancient and modern examples, is the use of small chinking stones for bringing the masonry to an even face after the larger stones forming the body of the wall have been laid in place. This method of construction has, in the case of some of the best built ancient pueblos, such as those on the Chaco in New Mexico, resulted in the production of marvelously finished stone walls, in which the mosaic-like bits are so closely laid as to show none but the finest joints on the face of the wall with but little trace of mortar. The chinking wedges necessarily varied greatly in dimensions to suit the sizes of the interstices between the larger stones of the wall. The use of stone in this manner no doubt suggested the banded walls that form so striking a feature in some of the Chaco houses. This arrangement was likely to be brought about by the occurrence in the cliffs of seams of stone of two degrees of thickness, suggesting to the builders the use of stones of similar thickness in continuous bands. The ornamental effect of this device was originally an accidental result of adopting the most convenient method of using the material at hand. Though the masonry of the modern pueblos does not afford examples of distinct bands, the 141 introduction of the small chinking spalls often follows horizontal lines of considerable length. Even in mud-plastered Zuñi, many outcrops of these thin, tabular wedges protrude from the partly eroded mudcoating of a wall and indicate the presence of this kind of stone masonry. An example is illustrated in Fig. 34, a tower-like projection at the northeast corner of house No. 2.
Perhaps the most notable feature of pueblo masonry, present in both ancient and modern examples, is the use of small chinking stones to create a smooth surface after the larger stones that make up the wall have been laid. This construction method has resulted, in some of the best-built ancient pueblos, like those at Chaco in New Mexico, in beautifully finished stone walls, where the mosaic-like pieces are fitted so closely that only the tiniest joints are visible, with minimal mortar showing. The chinking pieces varied significantly in size to fit the gaps between the larger stones. Using stone this way likely inspired the banded walls that are a striking characteristic of some Chaco houses. This design probably came from the presence of seams of stone in the cliffs with different thicknesses, which led the builders to use similarly sized stones in continuous bands. The decorative effect of this technique was originally an unintended result of the most practical way to utilize the materials available. Although the masonry of modern pueblos typically doesn't display distinct bands, the introduction of small chinking pieces often aligns along long horizontal lines. Even in mud-plastered Zuñi, many of these thin, flat wedges stick out from the partially eroded mud on a wall, indicating this form of stone masonry. An example is shown in Fig. 34, which is a tower-like projection at the northeast corner of house No. 2.
Fig. 34. Stone wedges of Zuñi masonry exposed in rain-washed wall.
Fig. 34. Stone wedges from Zuñi masonry revealed in a rain-soaked wall.
In the Tusayan house illustrated in Pl. LXXXIV, the construction of which was observed at Oraibi, the interstices between the large stones that formed the body of the wall, containing but small quantities of 142 mud mortar, were filled in or plugged with small fragments of stone, which, after being partly embedded in the mud of the joint, were driven in with unhafted stone hammers, producing a fairly even face of masonry, afterward gone over with mud plastering of the consistency of modeling clay, applied a handful at a time. Piled up on the ground near the new house at convenient points for the builders may be seen examples of the larger wall stones, indicating the marked tabular character of the pueblo masons’ material. The narrow edges of similar stones are visible in the unplastered portions of the house wall, which also illustrates the relative proportion of chinking stones. This latter, however, is a variable feature. Pl. XV affords a clear illustration of the proportion of these small stones in the old masonry of Payupki; while in Pl. XI, illustrating a portion of the outer wall of the Fire House, the tablets are fewer in number and thinner, their use predominating in the horizontal joints, as in the best of the old examples, but not to the same extent. Fig. 35 illustrates the inner face of an unplastered wall of a small house at Ojo Caliente, in which the modern method of using the chinking stones is shown. This example bears a strong resemblance to the Payupki masonry illustrated in Pl. XV in the irregularity with which the chinking stones are distributed in the joints of the wall. The same room affords an illustration of a cellar-like feature having the appearance of an intentional excavation to attain a depth for this room 143 corresponding to the adjoining floor level, but this effect is due simply to a clever adaptation of the house wall to an existing ledge of sandstone. The latter has had scarcely any artificial treatment beyond the partial smoothing of the rock in a few places and the cutting out of a small niche from the rocky wall. This niche occupies about the same position in this room that it does in the ordinary pueblo house. It is remarkable that the pueblo builders did not to a greater extent utilize their skill in working stone in the preparation of some of the irregular rocky sites that they have at times occupied for the more convenient reception of their wall foundations; but in nearly all such cases the buildings have been modified to suit the ground. An example of this practice is illustrated in Pl. XXIII, from the west side of Walpi. In some of the ancient examples the labor required to so prepare the sites would not have exceeded that expended on the massive masonry composed of numberless small stones. Many of the older works testify to the remarkable patience and industry of the builders in amassing and carefully adjusting vast quantities of building materials, and the modern Indians of Tusayan and Cibola have inherited much of this ancient spirit; yet this industry was rarely diverted to the excavation of room or village sites, except in the case of the kivas, in which special motives led to the practice. In some of the Chaco pueblos, as now seen, the floors of outer marginal rooms seem to be depressed below the general level of the surrounding soil; but it is now difficult to determine whether such was the original arrangement, as much sand and soil have drifted against the outer walls, raising the surface. In none of the pueblos within the limits of the provinces under discussion has there been found any evidence of the existence of underground cellars; the rooms that answer such purpose are built on the level of the ground. At Tusayan the ancient practice of using the ground-floor rooms for storage still prevails. In these are kept the dried fruit, vegetables, and meats that constitute the principal winter food of the Tusayan. Throughout Tusayan the walls of the first terrace rooms are not finished with as much care as those above that face the open courts. A quite smoothly finished coat of adobe is often seen in the upper stories, but is much more rarely applied to the rough masonry of the ground-floor rooms. At Zuñi no such difference of treatment is to be seen, a result of the recent departure from their original defensive use. At the present day most of the rooms that are built on the ground have external doors, often of large size, and are regarded by the Zuñi as preferable to the upper terraces as homes. This indicates that the idea of convenience has already largely overcome the traditional defensive requirements of pueblo arrangement. The general finish and quality of the masonry, too, does not vary noticeably in different portions of the village. An occasional wall may be seen in which underlying stones may be traced through the thin adobe covering, as in one of the walls of the court illustrated in Pl. LXXXII, but most of the walls have a fairly smooth 144 finish. The occasional examples of rougher masonry do not seem to be confined to any particular portion of the village. At Tusayan, on the other hand, there is a noticeable difference in the extent to which the finishing coat of adobe has been used in the masonry. The villages of the first mesa, whose occupants have come in frequent contact with the eastern pueblo Indians and with outsiders generally, show the effect in the adoption of several devices still unknown to their western neighbors, as is shown in the discussion of the distribution of roof openings in these villages, pp. 201-208. The builders of the first mesa seem also to have imitated their eastern brethren in the free use of the adobe coating over their masonry, while at the villages of the middle mesa, and particularly at Oraibi, the practice has been comparatively rare, imparting an appearance of ruggedness and antiquity to the architecture.
In the Tusayan house shown in Pl. L84, which was seen being built at Oraibi, the gaps between the large stones that made up the wall were filled with small fragments of stone. These fragments, after being partially pressed into the mud of the joint, were hammered in with unhafted stone hammers, creating a fairly even masonry surface that was later covered with a mud plaster that had the consistency of modeling clay, applied a handful at a time. You can find examples of the larger wall stones stacked on the ground near the new house at convenient spots for the builders, showing the distinct flat shape of the materials used by the pueblo masons. The narrow edges of similar stones can be seen in the unplastered parts of the wall, which also demonstrate the relative amount of chinking stones. However, this is a variable feature. Pl. XV clearly illustrates the proportion of these small stones in the old masonry of Payupki, while in Pl. XI, which shows part of the outer wall of the Fire House, there are fewer and thinner tablets, primarily used in the horizontal joints, similar to the best of the old examples, but not as much. Fig. 35 depicts the inner face of an unplastered wall of a small house at Ojo Caliente, showing the modern method of using chinking stones. This example closely resembles the Payupki masonry shown in Pl. XV in how irregularly the chinking stones are distributed in the wall joints. This same room also features a cellar-like aspect that appears to be an intentional excavation to create a depth for this room equal to the adjacent floor level, but this effect is actually due to a clever adaptation of the house wall to an existing ledge of sandstone. The sandstone has had minimal artificial treatment beyond partial smoothing in a few areas and the carving of a small niche into the rocky wall. This niche is positioned in this room much like it is in a typical pueblo house. It's noteworthy that the pueblo builders didn't utilize their skills in stonework more extensively in preparing some of the uneven rocky sites they occasionally occupied for better wall foundations; instead, in nearly all such cases, the buildings were modified to fit the ground. An example of this practice is shown in Pl. XXIII, from the west side of Walpi. In some of the ancient examples, the effort needed to prepare the sites wouldn’t have exceeded the effort spent on the strong masonry made up of countless small stones. Many of the older structures demonstrate the incredible patience and hard work of the builders in gathering and carefully placing huge amounts of building materials, and the modern Indians of Tusayan and Cibola have inherited much of this ancient spirit; however, this industriousness was rarely directed towards excavating room or village sites, except for kivas, which had specific reasons for such practices. In some of the Chaco pueblos, the floors of outer marginal rooms appear to be lower than the surrounding soil level; however, it’s now difficult to determine if this was the original design since much sand and soil have piled up against the outer walls, raising the surface. In none of the pueblos within the provinces being discussed has any evidence of underground cellars been found; the rooms serving that purpose are built at ground level. In Tusayan, the ancient practice of using ground-floor rooms for storage continues. These rooms are used for keeping dried fruits, vegetables, and meats, which are the main winter food for the Tusayan people. Throughout Tusayan, the walls of the first terrace rooms are not finished as carefully as those above that face the open courtyards. A smoothly finished coat of adobe is often seen on the upper stories, but is much less common on the rough masonry of the ground-floor rooms. At Zuñi, there is no such difference in treatment, resulting from a recent shift away from their original defensive use. Today, most of the ground-level rooms have external doors, often quite large, and the Zuñi view them as preferable to the upper terraces for living. This suggests that the convenience factor has largely surpassed the traditional defensive needs of pueblo layout. The overall finish and quality of the masonry also don’t noticeably vary across different parts of the village. Occasionally, a wall may show underlying stones through a thin adobe covering, as seen in one of the court walls illustrated in Pl. LXXXII, but most walls have a relatively smooth finish. The occasional sightings of rougher masonry do not seem to be restricted to any specific part of the village. In contrast, at Tusayan, there’s a clear difference in the amount of finishing coat of adobe used in the masonry. The villages on the first mesa, whose residents have interacted frequently with Eastern pueblo Indians and outsiders in general, show this influence in the adoption of several practices still unknown to their western neighbors, as discussed in the section on roof openings in these villages, pp. 201-208. The builders on the first mesa also appear to have copied their eastern counterparts by freely applying the adobe coating over their masonry, whereas at the villages on the middle mesa, especially at Oraibi, this practice has been relatively rare, giving the architecture a rugged and ancient look.
Fig. 35. An unplastered house wall in Ojo Caliente.
Fig. 35. A bare house wall in Ojo Caliente.
The stonework of this village, perhaps approaches the ancient types more closely than that of the others, some of the walls being noticeable for the frequent use of long bond stones. The execution of the masonry at the corners of some of the houses enforces this resemblance and indicates a knowledge of the principles of good construction in the proper alternation of the long stones. A comparison with the Kin-tiel masonry (Pl. LXXXIX) will show this resemblance. As a rule in pueblo masonry an upper house wall was supported along its whole length by a wall of a lower story, but occasional exceptions occur in both ancient and modern work, where the builders have dared to trust the weight of upper walls to wooden beams or girders, supported along part of their length by buttresses from the walls at their ends or by large, clumsy pieces of masonry, as was seen in the house of Sichumovi. In an upper story of Walpi also, partitions occur that are not built immediately over the lower walls, but on large beams supported on masonry piers. In the much higher terraces of Zuñi, the strength of many of the inner ground walls must be seriously taxed to withstand the superincumbent weight, as such walls are doubtless of only the average thickness and strength of ground walls. The dense clustering of this village has certainly in some instances thrown the weight of two, three, or even four additional, stories upon walls in which no provision was made for the unusual strain. The few supporting walls that were accessible to inspection did not indicate any provision in their thickness for the support of additional weight; in fact, the builders of the original walls could have no knowledge of their future requirements in this respect. In the pueblos of the Chaco upper partition walls were, in a few instances, supported directly on double girders, two posts of 12 or 14 inches in diameter placed side by side, without reinforcement by stone piers or buttresses, the room below being left wholly unobstructed. This construction was practicable for the careful builders of the Chaco, but an attempt by the Tusayan to achieve the same result would probably end in disaster. It was quite common among the ancient builders to divide the ground or storage floor into smaller rooms than the floor above, still preserving the vertical alignment of the walls.
The stonework in this village probably resembles ancient styles more than that of others, with some walls notably using long bond stones frequently. The way the masonry is done at the corners of some houses reinforces this resemblance and shows a good understanding of construction principles through the proper arrangement of the long stones. A comparison with the Kin-tiel masonry (Pl. L89) will highlight this similarity. Generally, in pueblo masonry, an upper wall was supported along its entire length by a wall from the lower story, but there are exceptions in both ancient and modern work where builders have taken the risk of relying on wooden beams or girders, supported partially by buttresses from the end walls or by large, heavy masonry pieces, as seen in the house of Sichumovi. In the upper story of Walpi, there are also partitions that aren’t built directly over the lower walls but instead are placed on large beams supported by masonry piers. In the much taller terraces of Zuñi, the strength of many interior ground walls is likely pushed to its limits to hold up the excess weight since those walls are probably of only average thickness and strength. The close clustering of this village has certainly, in some cases, added the weight of two, three, or even four extra stories onto walls that weren't designed for such unusual stress. The few supporting walls that could be inspected showed no additional thickness to handle the extra weight; in fact, the builders of the original walls could not have predicted this future requirement. In the pueblos of Chaco, some upper partition walls were directly supported on double girders, with two posts measuring 12 or 14 inches in diameter placed side by side, without any stone piers or buttresses for support, leaving the room below completely unobstructed. This method worked for the skilled builders of Chaco, but an attempt by the Tusayan to achieve the same would likely end badly. It was quite common among ancient builders to divide the ground or storage floor into smaller rooms than those above, while still keeping the walls vertically aligned.
Plate LXXXIX. Masonry in the north wing of Kin-tiel.
Plate LXXXIX. Brickwork in the north wing of Kin-tiel.
145 The finish of pueblo masonry rarely went far beyond the two leading forms, to which attention has been called, the free use of adobe on the one hand and the banded arrangement of ancient masonry on the other. These types appear to present development along divergent lines. The banded feature doubtless reached such a point of development in the Chaco pueblos that its decorative value began to be appreciated, for it is apparent that its elaboration has extended far beyond the requirements of mere utility. This point would never have been reached had the practice prevailed of covering the walls with a coating of mud. The cruder examples of banded construction, however—those that still kept well within constructional expediency—were doubtless covered with a coating of plaster where they occurred inside of the rooms. At Tusayan and Cibola, on the other hand, the tendency has been rather to elaborate the plastic element of the masonry. The nearly universal use of adobe is undoubtedly largely responsible for the more slovenly methods of building now in vogue, as it effectually conceals careless construction. It is not to be expected that walls would be carefully constructed of banded stonework when they were to be subsequently covered with mud. The elaboration of the use of adobe and its employment as a periodical coating for the dwellings, probably developed gradually into the use of a whitewash for the house walls, resulting finally in crude attempts at wall decoration.
145 The finishes of pueblo masonry usually revolved around two main styles: the extensive use of adobe and the banded layout of ancient masonry. These styles seem to evolve along different paths. The banded style likely developed to a point in the Chaco pueblos where its decorative appeal became valued, as it's clear that its complexity exceeded basic functional needs. This level of development wouldn't have occurred if the walls had mainly been covered with mud. However, the simpler examples of banded construction, which focused on practical building, were probably plastered when found inside rooms. In Tusayan and Cibola, there was more of a focus on enhancing the visual aspects of the masonry. The widespread use of adobe has certainly contributed to the more careless building practices seen today, as it effectively hides poor construction. It's unlikely that walls would be carefully built using banded stone when they were planned to be covered in mud afterward. The increased use of adobe and its application as a periodic coating for homes likely evolved into the eventual use of whitewash on house walls, leading to basic attempts at wall decoration.
Many of the interiors in Zuñi are washed with a coating of white, clayey gypsum, used in the form of a solution made by dissolving in hot water the lumps of the raw material, found in many localities. The mixture is applied to the walls while hot, and is spread by means of a rude glove-like sack, made of sheep or goat skin, with the hair side out. With this primitive brush the Zuñi housewives succeed in laying on a smooth and uniform coating over the plaster. An example of this class of work was observed in a room of house No. 2. It is difficult to determine to what extent this idea is aboriginal; as now employed it has doubtless been affected by the methods of the neighboring Spanish population, among whom the practice of white-coating the adobe houses inside and out is quite common. Several traces of whitewashing have been found among the cliff-dwellings of Canyon de Chelly, notably at the ruin known as Casa Blanca, but as some of these ruins contained evidences of post-Spanish occupation, the occurrence there of the whitewash does not necessarily imply any great antiquity for the practice.
Many of the interiors in Zuñi are covered with a layer of white, clay-like gypsum. This is created by dissolving lumps of the raw material in hot water, which can be found in many local areas. The mixture is applied to the walls while it’s still hot, using a rough glove-like sack made from sheep or goat skin, with the hair side facing out. With this basic tool, the Zuñi housewives manage to apply a smooth and consistent layer over the plaster. An example of this work was seen in a room of house No. 2. It's hard to tell how much of this method is original; the way it's done now has likely been influenced by the techniques of the nearby Spanish population, who commonly whitewash their adobe houses both inside and out. There are several signs of whitewashing among the cliff dwellings of Canyon de Chelly, especially at the site known as Casa Blanca. However, since some of these ruins show evidence of post-Spanish occupation, the presence of whitewash there doesn’t necessarily indicate that the practice is very old.
External use of this material is much rarer, particularly in Zuñi, where only a few walls of upper stories are whitened. Where it is not protected from the rains by an overhanging coping or other feature, the finish is not durable. Occasionally where a doorway or other opening has been repaired the evidences of patchwork are obliterated by a surrounding band of fresh plastering, varying in width from 4 inches to a foot or more. Usually this band is laid on as a thick wash of adobe, but in some instances a decorative effect is attained by using white. It 146 is curious to find that at Tusayan the decorative treatment of the finishing wash has been carried farther than, at Zuñi. The use of a darker band of color about the base of a whitewashed room has already been noticed in the description of a Tusayan interior. On many of the outer walls of upper stories the whitewash has been stopped within a foot of the coping, the unwhitened portion of the walls at the top having the effect of a frieze. In a second story house of Mashongnavi, that had been carefully whitewashed, additional decorative effect was produced by tinting a broad band about the base of the wall with an application of bright pinkish clay, which was also carried around the doorway as an enframing band, as in the case of the Zuñi door above described. The angles on each side, at the junction of the broad base band with the narrower doorway border, were filled in with a design of alternating pink and white squares. This doorway is illustrated in Fig. 36. Farther north, on the same terrace, the jamb of a whitewashed doorway was decorated with the design shown on the right hand side of Fig. 36, executed also in pink clay. This design closely resembles a pattern that is commonly embroidered upon the large white “kachina,” or ceremonial blankets. It is not known whether the device is here regarded as having any special significance. The pink clay in which these designs have been executed has in Sichumovi been used for the coating of an entire house front.
External use of this material is pretty rare, especially in Zuñi, where only a few upper story walls are whitewashed. If it's not protected from the rain by an overhanging ledge or some other feature, the finish doesn’t last. Sometimes, when a doorway or another opening has been repaired, the signs of patchwork are covered up by a surrounding band of fresh plaster that varies in width from 4 inches to a foot or more. Usually, this band is applied as a thick wash of adobe, but in some cases, a decorative effect is achieved by using white. It’s interesting to see that at Tusayan, they have taken the decorative treatment of the finishing wash further than in Zuñi. The use of a darker band of color around the base of a whitewashed room has already been mentioned when describing a Tusayan interior. On many of the outer walls of upper stories, the whitewash stops about a foot from the coping, leaving the unwhitened portion at the top to look like a frieze. In a second-story house in Mashongnavi, which had been carefully whitewashed, an additional decorative effect was created by tinting a broad band around the base of the wall with a bright pinkish clay, which was also applied around the doorway as a framing band, just like the Zuñi door described earlier. The corners on each side, where the broad base band meets the narrower doorway border, were filled in with a pattern of alternating pink and white squares. This doorway is illustrated in Fig. 36. Further north, on the same terrace, the side of a whitewashed doorway was decorated with the design shown on the right-hand side of Fig. 36, also made with pink clay. This design closely resembles a pattern that is commonly embroidered on large white “kachina” or ceremonial blankets. It’s unknown if this motif holds any special significance here. The pink clay used for these designs has also been used in Sichumovi for coating an entire house front.
Fig. 36. Wall decorations in Mashongnavi executed in pink on a white ground.
Fig. 36. Wall decorations in Mashongnavi done in pink on a white background.
In addition to the above-mentioned uses of stone and earth in the masonry of house walls, the pueblo builders have employed both these materials in a more primitive manner in building the walls of corrals and gardens, and for other purposes. The small terraced gardens of Zuñi, located on the borders of the village on the southwest and southeast sides, close to the river bank, are each surrounded by walls 2½ or 3 feet high, of very light construction, the average thickness not exceeding 6 or 8 inches. These rude walls are built of small, irregularly rounded lumps of adobe, formed by hand, and coarsely plastered with mud. When the crops are gathered in the fall the walls are broken down in places to facilitate access to the inclosures, so that they require repairing at each planting season. Aside from this they are so frail as to require frequent repairs throughout the period of their use. This method of building walls was adopted because it was the readiest and 147 least laborious means of inclosing the required space. The character of these garden walls is illustrated in Pl. XC, and their construction with rough lumps of crude adobe shows also the contrast between the weak appearance of this work and the more substantial effect of the masonry of the adjoining unfinished house. At the Cibolan farming pueblos inclosing walls were usually made of stone, as were also those of Tusayan. Pl. LXX indicates the manner in which the material has been used in the corrals of Pescado, located within the village. The stone walls are used in combination with stakes, such as are employed at the main pueblo.
In addition to the uses of stone and earth in the construction of house walls, the pueblo builders have also used these materials in a more basic way for building the walls of corrals, gardens, and other purposes. The small terraced gardens of Zuñi, situated on the edges of the village on the southwest and southeast sides near the riverbank, each have walls that are 2½ to 3 feet high, built very lightly, with an average thickness of no more than 6 or 8 inches. These rough walls are made from small, irregularly shaped clumps of adobe, formed by hand and roughly plastered with mud. When the crops are harvested in the fall, the walls are broken down in places to make it easier to access the enclosures, which means they need to be repaired before each planting season. Besides that, they are so fragile that they require frequent repairs during their use. This method of building walls was chosen because it was the quickest and least labor-intensive way to enclose the needed space. The nature of these garden walls is shown in Pl. XC, and their construction with rough lumps of crude adobe highlights the contrast between the flimsy appearance of this work and the sturdier look of the masonry of the nearby unfinished house. At the Cibolan farming pueblos, enclosing walls were generally made of stone, as were those in Tusayan. Pl. LXX shows how the material has been used in the corrals of Pescado, found within the village. The stone walls are combined with stakes, similar to those used at the main pueblo.
Plate XC. Adobe garden walls near Zuñi.
Plate XC. Adobe garden walls near Zuñi.
Small inclosed gardens, like those of Zuñi, occur at several points in Tusayan. The thin walls are made of dry masonry, quite as rude in character as those inclosing the Zuñi gardens. The smaller clusters are usually located in the midst of large areas of broken stone that has fallen from the mesa above. In the foreground of Pl. XXII may be seen a number of examples of such work. Pl. XCI illustrates a group of corrals at Oraibi whose walls are laid up without the use of mud mortar.
Small enclosed gardens, like those in Zuñi, can be found in several places in Tusayan. The thin walls are built from dry stone, just as rudely as those that surround the Zuñi gardens. The smaller clusters are typically situated amid large areas of broken stone that has fallen from the mesa above. In the foreground of Pl. XXII you can see several examples of this type of work. Pl. XCI shows a group of corrals at Oraibi with walls constructed without any mud mortar.
Plate XCI. A group of stone corrals near Oraibi.
Plate XCI. A collection of stone enclosures close to Oraibi.
Where exceptionally large blocks of stone are available they have been utilized in an upright position, and occur at greater or less intervals along the thin walls of dry masonry. An example of this use was seen in a garden wall on the west side of Walpi, where the stones had been set on end in the yielding surface of a sandy slope among the foothills. A similar arrangement, occurring close to the houses at Ojo Caliente, is illustrated in Pl. XCII. Large, upright slabs of stone have been used by the pueblo builders in many ways, sometimes incorporated into the architecture of the houses, and again in detached positions at some distance from the villages. Pls. XCIII and XCIV, drawn from the photographs of Mr. W. H. Jackson, afford illustrations of this usage in the ancient ruins of Montezuma Canyon. In the first of these cases the stones were utilized, apparently, in house masonry. Among the ruins in the valley of the San Juan and its tributaries, as described by Messrs. W. H. Holmes and W. H. Jackson, varied arrangements of upright slabs of stone are of frequent occurrence. The rows of stones are sometimes arranged in squares, sometimes in circles, and occasionally are incorporated into the walls of ordinary masonry, as in the example illustrated. Isolated slabs are also met with among the ruins. At K’iakima, at a point near the margin of the ruin, occurs a series of very large, upright slabs, which occupy the positions of headstones to a number of small inclosures, thought to be mortuary, outlined upon the ground. These have been already described in connection with the ground plan of this village.
Where there are really large blocks of stone, they have been used upright and are found at various intervals along the thin walls of dry masonry. One example of this can be seen in a garden wall on the west side of Walpi, where the stones were set on end in the soft surface of a sandy slope among the foothills. A similar setup near the houses at Ojo Caliente is shown in Pl. XCII. The pueblo builders have used large upright stone slabs in many ways, sometimes incorporating them into the structure of houses and at other times placing them alone at a distance from the villages. Pls. XCIII and XCIV, taken from photographs by Mr. W. H. Jackson, provide examples of this usage in the ancient ruins of Montezuma Canyon. In the first case, the stones seem to have been used in house masonry. Among the ruins in the San Juan valley and its tributaries, as noted by Messrs. W. H. Holmes and W. H. Jackson, various arrangements of upright stone slabs are commonly found. The rows of stones are sometimes laid out in squares, sometimes in circles, and occasionally incorporated into the walls of regular masonry, as shown in the example illustrated. Isolated slabs can also be found among the ruins. At K’iakima, near the edge of the ruin, there is a series of very large upright slabs that serve as headstones for several small enclosures believed to be burial sites, outlined on the ground. These have already been described in relation to the ground plan of this village.
Plate XCII. An inclosing wall of upright stones at Ojo Caliente.
Plate XCII. A surrounding wall made of upright stones at Ojo Caliente.
The employment of upright slabs of stone to mark graves probably prevailed to some extent in ancient practice, but other uses suggest themselves. Occupying a conspicuous point in the village of Kin-tiel (Pl. LXIII) is an upright slab of sandstone which seems to stand in its original position undisturbed, though the walls of the adjoining rooms 148 are in ruins. A similar feature was seen at Peñasco Blanco, on the east side of the village and a short distance without the inclosing wall. Both these rude pillars are, in character and in position, very similar to an upright stone of known use at Zuñi. A hundred and fifty feet from this pueblo is a large upright block of sandstone, which is said to be used as a datum point in the observations of the sun made by a priest of Zuñi for the regulation of the time for planting and harvesting, for determining the new year, and for fixing the dates of certain other ceremonial observances. By the aid of such devices as the native priests have at their command they are enabled to fix the date of the winter solstice with a fair degree of accuracy. Such rude determination of time was probably an aboriginal invention, and may have furnished the motive in other cases for placing stone pillars in such unusual positions. The explanation of the governor of Zuñi for a sun symbol seen on an upright stone at Matsaki has been given in the description of that place. Single slabs are also used, as seen in the easternmost room group of Tâaaiyalana, and in the southwestern cluster on the same mesa, in the building of shrines for the deposit of plume sticks and other ceremonial objects.
The use of upright stone slabs to mark graves likely existed in ancient times, but there are other possible uses as well. In the village of Kin-tiel (Pl. LXIII), there's a significant upright slab of sandstone that appears to be in its original, undisturbed position, even though the walls of the surrounding rooms 148 are in ruins. A similar feature can be found at Peñasco Blanco, just to the east of the village and a short distance outside the enclosing wall. Both of these rough pillars are, in terms of style and location, very similar to an upright stone of known purpose at Zuñi. About one hundred and fifty feet from this pueblo, there's a large upright block of sandstone that is reportedly used as a reference point for sun observations by a Zuñi priest to help determine the timing for planting and harvesting, the start of the new year, and the dates for certain ceremonial events. With the tools available to them, the native priests can accurately determine the date of the winter solstice. This basic method of tracking time was likely a native innovation and may have inspired the placement of stone pillars in such unique locations. The explanation from the governor of Zuñi regarding a sun symbol seen on an upright stone at Matsaki has been included in the description of that location. Single slabs are also used, as observed in the easternmost room group of Tâaaiyalana and in the southwestern cluster on the same mesa, for building shrines where plume sticks and other ceremonial items are deposited.
Plate XCIII. Upright blocks of sandstone built into an ancient pueblo wall.
Plate XCIII. Vertical blocks of sandstone incorporated into an old pueblo wall.
An unusual employment of small stones in an upright position occurs at Zuñi. The inclosing wall of the church yard, still used as a burial place, is provided at intervals along its top with upright pieces of stone set into the joints of a regular coping course that caps the wall. This feature may have some connection with the idea of vertical grave stones, noted at K’iakima. It is difficult to surmise what practical purpose could have been subserved by these small upright stones.
An unusual use of small stones standing upright happens at Zuñi. The surrounding wall of the church yard, which is still used as a burial site, has upright stone pieces set into the joints of a regular coping course that caps the wall at intervals along its top. This feature might be related to the concept of vertical grave stones noted at K’iakima. It's hard to guess what practical purpose these small upright stones could serve.
Plate XCIV. Ancient wall of upright rocks in southwestern Colorado.
Plate XCIV. Ancient wall of vertical rocks in southwestern Colorado.
Notwithstanding the use of large stones for special purposes the pueblo builders rarely appreciated the advantages that might be obtained by the proper use of such material. Pueblo masonry is essentially made up of small, often minute, constructional units. This restriction doubtless resulted in a higher degree of mural finish than would otherwise have been attained, but it also imposes certain limitations upon their architectural achievement. Some of these are noted in the discussion of openings and of other details of construction.
Despite the use of large stones for specific purposes, the pueblo builders rarely recognized the benefits that could come from using such materials properly. Pueblo masonry mainly consists of small, often tiny, building units. This limitation likely led to a higher quality of wall finish than would have been achieved otherwise, but it also places certain constraints on their architectural accomplishments. Some of these are mentioned in the discussion about openings and other construction details.
Pl. XLV, an illustration of a Mormon mill building at Moen-kopi, already referred to in the description of that village, is introduced for the purpose of comparing the methods adopted by the natives and by the whites in the treatment of the same class of material. Perhaps the most noteworthy contrast is seen in the sills and lintels of the openings.
Pl. XLV, an illustration of a Mormon mill building at Moen-kopi, which was previously mentioned in the description of that village, is included to compare the methods used by the natives and by the whites in handling the same type of material. The most striking difference is noticeable in the sills and lintels of the openings.
ROOFS AND FLOORS.
In the pueblo system of building, roof and floor is one; for all the floors, except such as are formed immediately on the surface of the ground, are at the same time the roofs and ceilings of lower rooms. The pueblo plan of to-day readily admits of additions at any time and almost at any point of the basal construction. The addition of rooms 149 above converts a roof into the floor of the new room, so that there can be no distinction in method of construction between floors and roofs, except the floors are occasionally covered with a complete paving of thin stone slabs, a device that in external roofs is confined to the copings that cap the walls and enframe openings.
In the pueblo building system, the roof and floor are the same; all floors, except for those directly on the ground, also serve as roofs and ceilings for the rooms below. Today's pueblo layout easily allows for additions at any time and almost anywhere in the base structure. Adding rooms above turns a roof into the floor of the new room, so there’s really no difference in how floors and roofs are built, except that floors are sometimes topped with a complete layer of thin stone slabs, a technique that for external roofs is limited to the copings that cap the walls and frame openings. 149
Fig. 37. Diagram of Zuñi roof construction.
Fig. 37. Diagram of Zuñi roof building.
The methods of roofing their houses practiced by the pueblo builders varied but little, and followed the general order of construction that has been outlined in describing Tusayan house building. The diagram, shown in Fig. 37, an isometric projection illustrating roof construction, is taken from a Zuñi example, the building of which was observed by the writer. The roof is built by first a series of principal beams or rafters. These are usually straight, round poles of 6 or 8 inches in diameter, with all bark and projecting knots removed. Squared beams are of very rare occurrence; the only ones seen were those of the Tusayan kivas, of Spanish manufacture. In recently constructed houses the principal beams are often of large size and are very neatly squared off at the ends. Similar square ended beams of large size are met with in the ancient work of the Chaco pueblos, but there the enormous labor involved in producing the result with only the aid of stone implements is in keeping with the highly finished character of the masonry and the general massiveness of the construction. The same treatment was adopted in Kin-tiel, as may be seen in Pl. XCV, which illustrates a beam resting upon a ledge or offset of the inner walls. The recent introduction of improved mechanical aids has exerted a strong influence on the character of the construction in greatly facilitating execution. The use of the American ax made it a much easier task to cut large timbers, and the introduction of the “burro” and ox greatly facilitated their transportation. In the case of the modern pueblos, such as Zuñi, the dwelling rooms that were built by families so poor as not to have these aids would to some extent indicate the fact by their more primitive construction, and particularly by their small size, in 150 this respect more closely resembling the rooms of the ancient pueblos. As a result the poorer classes would be more likely to perpetuate primitive devices, through the necessity for practicing methods that to the wealthier members of the tribe were becoming a matter of tradition only. In such a sedentary tribe as the present Zuñi, these differences of wealth and station are more marked than one would expect to find among a people practicing a style of architecture so evidently influenced by the communal principle, and the architecture of to-day shows the effect of such distinctions. In the house of the governor of Zuñi a new room has been recently built, in which the second series of the roof, that applied over the principal beams, consisted of pine shakes or shingles, and these supported the final earth covering without any intervening material. In the typical arrangement, however, illustrated in the figure, the first series, or principal beams, are covered by another series of small poles, about an inch and a half or two inches in diameter, at right angles to the first, and usually laid quite close together. The ends of these small poles are partially embedded in the masonry of the walls. In an example of the more careful and laborious work of the ancient builders seen at Peñasco Blanco, on the Chaco, the principal beams were covered with narrow boards, from 2 to 4 inches wide and about 1 inch thick, over which was put the usual covering of earth. The boards had the appearance of having been split out with wedges, the edges and faces having the characteristic fibrous appearance of torn or split wood. At Zuñi an instance occurs where split poles have been used for the second series of a roof extending through the whole thickness of the wall and projecting outside, as is commonly the case with the first series. A similar arrangement was seen in a ruined tower in the vicinity of Fort Wingate, New Mexico. In the typical roof construction illustrated the second series is covered with small twigs or brush, laid in close contact and at right angles to the underlying series, or parallel with the main beams. Pl. XCVI, illustrating an unroofed adobe house in Zuñi, shows several bundles of this material on an adjoining roof. This series is in turn covered with a layer of grass and small brush, again at right angles, which prepares the frame for the reception of the final earth covering, this latter being the fifth application to the roof. In the example illustrated the entire earth covering of the roof was finished in a single application of the material. It has been seen that at Tusayan a layer of moistened earth is applied, followed by a thicker layer of the dry soil.
The roofing methods used by the pueblo builders were quite consistent and followed the general construction patterns outlined in the description of Tusayan house building. The diagram shown in Fig. 37, an isometric projection illustrating roof construction, is based on a Zuñi example observed by the writer. The roof starts with a series of main beams or rafters. These are typically straight, round poles about 6 to 8 inches in diameter, with all bark and protruding knots removed. Squared beams are very uncommon; the only ones noted were from the Tusayan kivas, made in Spanish style. In recently built houses, the main beams are often quite large and neatly squared off at the ends. Similar large, square-ended beams can be found in the ancient structures of the Chaco pueblos, where the significant labor required to achieve this using only stone tools matches the highly polished nature of the masonry and the overall sturdiness of the construction. The same technique was used in Kin-tiel, as seen in Pl. XCV, which depicts a beam resting on a ledge or offset of the inner walls. The recent introduction of mechanical tools has greatly impacted construction, making the work much easier. The use of the American axe simplified cutting large timbers, while the introduction of "burros" and oxen improved transportation. In modern pueblos like Zuñi, the dwelling rooms built by families too poor to have these tools often indicate this with their more basic construction and smaller size, resembling the rooms of ancient pueblos more closely. Consequently, poorer families are more likely to continue using primitive methods due to the need to rely on techniques that have become traditional for the wealthier tribe members. Among a settled tribe like the current Zuñi, differences in wealth and class are more pronounced than one might expect in a community whose architecture clearly reflects communal principles, and today's architecture reflects these distinctions. Recently, in the home of the governor of Zuñi, a new room was built in which the second layer of the roof, placed over the main beams, consisted of pine shakes or shingles, directly supporting the final earth covering without any other material in between. However, in the typical structure illustrated in the figure, the main beams are covered by another series of smaller poles, about 1.5 to 2 inches in diameter, laid perpendicular to the main beams and usually positioned closely together. The ends of these small poles are partially embedded in the wall's masonry. In a more meticulous and labor-intensive example from the ancient builders seen at Peñasco Blanco in the Chaco, the main beams were covered with narrow boards, 2 to 4 inches wide and about 1 inch thick, over which the usual layer of earth was placed. The boards appeared to be split with wedges, having the distinctive fibrous look of torn or split wood. An instance at Zuñi features split poles used for the second layer of a roof that extends through the entire thickness of the wall and projects externally, similar to what is commonly seen with the first layer. A comparable setup was found in a ruined tower near Fort Wingate, New Mexico. In the typical roof construction illustrated, the second layer is covered with small twigs or brush, laid closely together and perpendicular to the underlying layer, or parallel to the main beams. Pl. XCVI, illustrating an unroofed adobe house in Zuñi, displays several bundles of this material on an adjacent roof. This layer is then covered with a layer of grass and small brush, again at right angles, preparing the frame for the final earth covering, which is the fifth layer applied to the roof. In the illustrated example, the complete earth covering of the roof was finished in a single application of material. It has been noted that at Tusayan, a layer of moist earth is applied first, followed by a thicker layer of dry soil.
Plate XCV. Ancient floor-beams at Kin-tiel.
Plate XCV. Old floor beams at Kin-tiel.
In ancient construction, the method of arranging the material varied somewhat. In some cases series 3 was very carefully constructed of straight willow wands laid side by side in contact. This gave a very neat appearance to the ceiling within the room. Examples were seen in Canyon de Chelly, at Mummy Cave, and at Hungo Pavie and Pueblo Bonito on the Chaco.
In ancient construction, the way materials were arranged varied a bit. In some instances, series 3 was meticulously built using straight willow sticks placed side by side, touching each other. This created a tidy look for the ceiling inside the room. Examples can be seen in Canyon de Chelly, at Mummy Cave, and at Hungo Pavie and Pueblo Bonito on the Chaco.
Plate XCVI. Adobe walls in Zuñi.
Plate XCVI. Adobe walls in Zuñi.
The small size of available roofing rafters has at Tusayan brought about a construction of clumsy piers of masonry in a few of the larger rooms, which support the ends of two sets of main girders, and these in turn carry series 1, or the main ceiling beams of the roof. The girders are generally double, an arrangement that has been often employed in ancient times, as many examples occur among the ruins. The purpose of such arrangement may have been to admit of the abutment of the ends of series 1, when the members of the latter were laid in contact. In the absence of squared beams, which seem never to have been used in the old work, this abutment could only be securely accomplished by the use of double girders, as suggested in the following diagram, Fig. 38.
The small size of the available roofing rafters in Tusayan has led to the construction of awkward masonry piers in some of the larger rooms. These piers support the ends of two sets of main girders, which in turn carry series 1, or the main ceiling beams of the roof. The girders are usually double, a design that was commonly used in ancient times, as seen in many examples among the ruins. This arrangement likely allowed for the ends of series 1 to be supported when the members of that series were placed together. Since squared beams don't seem to have been used in the older structures, this support could only be securely achieved with the use of double girders, as illustrated in the following diagram, Fig. 38.
![]() |
Fig. 38.
Showing abutment of smaller roof beams over round girders. |
The final roof covering, composed of clay, is usually laid on very carefully and firmly, and, when the surface is unbroken, answers fairly well as a watershed. A slight slope or fall is given to the roof. This roof subserves every purpose of a front yard to the rooms that open upon it, and seems to be used exactly like the ground itself. Sheepskins are stretched and pegged out upon it for tanning or drying, and the characteristic Zuñi dome-shaped oven is frequently built upon it. In Zuñi generally upper rooms are provided only with a mud floor, although occasionally the method of paving with large thin slabs of stone is adopted. These are often somewhat irregular in form, the object being to have them as large as possible, so that considerable ingenuity is often displayed in selecting the pieces and in joining the irregular edges. This arrangement, similar to that of the kiva floors of Tusayan, is occasionally met with in the kivas.
The final roof covering, made of clay, is typically laid down very carefully and securely, and when the surface is intact, it works quite well as a water catchment. The roof is given a slight slope. This roof serves all the functions of a front yard for the rooms that open onto it, and it seems to be used just like the ground itself. Sheepskins are stretched and pinned out on it for tanning or drying, and the typical Zuñi dome-shaped oven is often built on it. Generally, in Zuñi, upper rooms have only a mud floor, although sometimes they use large thin slabs of stone for flooring. These stones are often somewhat irregular in shape, aiming to make them as large as possible, which requires considerable creativity in selecting the pieces and matching the uneven edges. This setup, similar to the kiva floors in Tusayan, can sometimes be found in the kivas.
In making excavations at Kin-tiel, the floor of the ground room in which the circular door illustrated in Pl. C, was found was paved with large, irregular fragments of stone, the thickness of which did not average more than an inch. Its floor, whose paving was all in place, was strewn with broken, irregular fragments similar in character, which must have been used as the flooring of an upper chamber.
In the excavations at Kin-tiel, the ground room where the circular door shown in Pl. C was discovered had a floor made of large, irregular stone pieces that were about an inch thick on average. The floor, which still had all its paving intact, was covered with broken, uneven pieces similar in type, likely used as flooring for an upper room.
WALL COPINGS AND ROOF DRAINS.
In the construction of the typical pueblo house the walls are carried up to the height of the roof surface, and are then capped with a continuous protecting coping of thin flat stones, laid in close contact, their outer edges flush with the face of the wall. This arrangement is still the prevailing one at Tusayan, though there is an occasional example of the projecting coping that practically forms a cornice. This latter is the more usual form at Zuñi, though in the farming pueblos of Cibola 152 it does not occur with any greater frequency than at Tusayan. The flush coping is in Tusayan made of the thinnest and most uniform specimens of building stone available, but these are not nearly so well adapted to the purpose as those found in the vicinity of Zuñi.
In building a typical pueblo house, the walls rise to the height of the roof and are topped with a continuous protective layer of thin flat stones, placed closely together, with their outer edges aligned with the wall's surface. This setup is still the most common in Tusayan, although there are occasional instances of a projecting coping that essentially creates a cornice. This type is more standard in Zuñi, but in the farming pueblos of Cibola, it doesn’t appear any more frequently than in Tusayan. In Tusayan, the flush coping is made from the thinnest and most uniform building stones available, but these aren't nearly as suitable for the job as those found near Zuñi.
Here the projecting stones are of singularly regular and symmetrical form, and receive very little artificial treatment. Their extreme thinness makes it easy to trim off the projecting corners and angles, reducing them to such a form that they can be laid in close contact. Thus laid they furnish an admirable protection against the destructive action of the violent rains. The stones are usually trimmed to a width corresponding to the thickness of the walls. Of course where a projecting cornice is built, it can be made, to some extent, to conform to the width of available coping stones. These can usually be procured, however, of nearly uniform width. In the case of the overhanging cornices the necessary projection is attained by continuing either the main roof beams, or sometimes the smaller poles of the second series, according to the position of the required cornice, for a foot or more beyond the outer face of the wall. Over these poles the roofing is continued as in ordinary roof construction with the exception that the edge of the earth covering is built of masonry, an additional precaution against its destruction by the rains. In many places the adobe plastering originally applied to the faces of these cornices, as well as to the walls, has been washed away, exposing the whole construction. In some of these instances the face of the cornice furnishes a complete section of the roof, in which all the series of its construction can be readily identified. The protective agency of these coping stones is well illustrated in Pl. XCVII, which shows the destructive effect of rain at a point where an open joint has admitted enough water to bare the masonry of the cornice face, eating through its coating of adobe, while at the firmly closed joint toward the left there has been no erosive action. The much larger proportion of projecting copings or cornices in Zuñi, as compared with Tusayan, is undoubtedly attributable to the universal smoothing of the walls with adobe, and to the more general use of this perishable medium in this village, and the consequent necessity for protecting the walls. The efficiency of this means of protecting the wall against the wear of weather is seen in the preservation of external whitewashing for several feet below such a cornice on the face of the walls. At the pueblo of Acoma a similar extensive use of projecting cornices is met with, particularly on the third story walls. Here again it is due to the use of adobe, which has been more frequently employed in the finish of the higher and newer portions of the village than in the lower terraces. As a rule these overhanging copings occur principally on the southern exposures of the buildings and on the terraced sides of house rows. When walls rise to the height of several stories directly from the ground, such as the back walls of house rows, they are not usually provided with this feature but are capped with flush copings.
Here, the projecting stones are unusually regular and symmetrical, needing very little man-made modification. Their extreme thinness allows for trimming off the projecting corners and angles, shaping them so they can be closely stacked together. When placed this way, they provide excellent protection against the destructive impact of heavy rains. The stones are often cut to a width that matches the thickness of the walls. Naturally, when a projecting cornice is constructed, it can be slightly adjusted to fit the width of available coping stones. However, these stones can typically be sourced in nearly uniform widths. For overhanging cornices, the necessary projection is achieved by extending either the main roof beams or, sometimes, the smaller poles of the second series, depending on where the cornice needs to be, by a foot or more beyond the outer wall. The roofing continues over these poles like in traditional roof construction, except the edge of the earth covering is made of masonry, providing an extra safeguard against rain damage. In many areas, the adobe plastering originally applied to the surfaces of these cornices, as well as the walls, has been eroded away, revealing the entire structure. In some cases, the face of the cornice shows a complete section of the roof, where all the layers of its construction can be easily identified. The protective role of these coping stones is clearly demonstrated in Pl. XCVII, which illustrates the harmful effect of rain at a spot where an open joint has allowed enough water to expose the masonry of the cornice face, eroding its adobe coating, while the tightly sealed joint to the left has shown no signs of wear. The greater number of projecting copings or cornices in Zuñi compared to Tusayan is likely due to the widespread application of adobe on the walls and the more frequent use of this fragile material in this village, necessitating wall protection. The effectiveness of this protective measure is evident in the preservation of external whitewashing for several feet below such a cornice on the walls. At the pueblo of Acoma, a similarly extensive use of projecting cornices can be found, especially on the third-story walls. Here again, it results from the more frequent use of adobe, which is more often applied in the finishing of the higher and newer parts of the village than in the lower terraces. Generally, these overhanging copings are found principally on the southern sides of the buildings and on the terraced sides of house rows. When walls rise several stories directly from the ground, like the back walls of house rows, they typically don’t feature this design but are topped with flush copings.
Plate XCVII. Wall coping and oven at Zuñi.
Plate XCVII. Wall coping and oven at Zuñi.
153 The rapid and destructive erosion of the earthen roof covering must have early stimulated the pueblo architect to devise means for promptly distributing where it would do the least harm, the water which came upon his house. This necessity must have led to the early use of roof drains, for in no other way could the ancient builders have provided for the effectual removal of the water from, the roofs and at the same time have preserved intact the masonry of the walls. Unfortunately we have no examples of such features in the ruined pueblos, for in the destruction or decay of the houses they are among the first details to be lost. The roof drain in the modern architecture becomes a very prominent feature, particularly at Zuñi.
153 The fast and damaging erosion of the earthen roof must have pushed the pueblo architect to come up with ways to quickly direct the water that fell on his house where it would cause the least damage. This need likely led to the early adoption of roof drains, since there was no other way for the ancient builders to effectively remove water from the roofs while also protecting the masonry of the walls. Unfortunately, we don't have any examples of these features in the ruined pueblos, as they tend to be among the first details to be lost during the destruction or decay of the houses. In modern architecture, roof drains are a very noticeable element, especially at Zuñi.
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 39. Single stone roof drains. | |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 40. Trough roof drains of stone. | |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 41. Wooden roof drains. |
These drains are formed by piercing an opening through the thickness of the coping wall, at a point where the drainage from the roof would collect, the opening being made with a decided pitch and furnished with a spout or device of some kind to insure the discharge of the water beyond the face of the wall. These spouts assume a variety of forms. Perhaps the most common is that of a single long, narrow slab of stone, set at a suitable angle and of sufficient projection to throw the discharge clear of the wall. Fig. 39 illustrates drains of this type, No. 1 being a Tusayan example and No. 2 from Zuñi. It will be noted that the surrounding masonry of the former, as well as the stone itself, are much ruder than the Zuñi example. Another type of drain, not differing greatly from the preceding, is illustrated in Fig. 40. This form is a slight improvement on the single stone drain, as it is provided with side 154 pieces which convert the device into a trough-like spout, and more effectually direct the discharge. No. 1 is a Tusayan spout and No. 2 a Zuñi example. Wooden spouts are also commonly used for this purpose. Fig. 41 illustrates an example from each province of this form of drain. These are usually made from small tree trunks, not exceeding 3 or 4 inches in diameter, and are gouged out from one side. No tubular specimens of wooden spouts were seen. At Tusayan the builders have utilized stone of a concretionary formation for roof drains. The workers in stone could not wish for material more suitably fashioned for the purpose than these specimens. Two of these curious stone channels are illustrated in Fig. 42. Two more examples of Tusayan roof drains are illustrated in Fig. 43. The first of the latter shows the use of a discarded metate, or mealing stone, and the second of a gourd that has been walled into the coping.
These drains are made by cutting an opening through the thickness of the coping wall, where the roof drainage collects. The opening is designed with a clear pitch and includes a spout or some kind of device to ensure the water flows out beyond the face of the wall. These spouts come in various shapes. The most common is a single long, narrow slab of stone set at an appropriate angle and projecting enough to direct the discharge clear of the wall. Fig. 39 shows this type of drain, with No. 1 being an example from Tusayan and No. 2 from Zuñi. It’s noticeable that the surrounding masonry of the first is much rougher than that of the Zuñi example. Another type of drain, which is similar to the previous one, is shown in Fig. 40. This design is a slight improvement on the single stone drain, as it has side pieces that turn it into a trough-like spout, effectively directing the discharge. No. 1 is a Tusayan spout and No. 2 is from Zuñi. Wooden spouts are also commonly used for this purpose. Fig. 41 shows an example from each province of this type of drain. These are generally made from small tree trunks, no more than 3 or 4 inches in diameter, and hollowed out on one side. No tubular wooden spouts were observed. At Tusayan, builders have used stone with a concretionary formation for roof drains. The stoneworkers couldn’t ask for better-suited material than these specimens. Two of these unusual stone channels are shown in Fig. 42. Two additional examples of Tusayan roof drains are displayed in Fig. 43. The first of these uses a discarded metate, or grinding stone, while the second incorporates a gourd that has been built into the coping.
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 42. Curved roof drains of stone in Tusayan. | |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 43. Tusayan roof drains; a discarded metate and a gourd. |
155 It is said that tubes of clay were used at Awatubi in olden times for roof drains, but there remains no positive evidence of this. Three forms of this device are attributed to the people of that village. Some are said to have been made of wood, others of stone, and some again of sun-dried clay. The native explanation of the use in this connection of sun-dried clay, instead of the more durable baked product, was that the application of fire to any object that water passes through would be likely to dry up the rains. It was stated in this connection that at the present day the cobs of the corn used for planting are not burned until rain has fallen on the crop. If the clay spout described really existed among the people at Awatubi, it was likely to have been an innovation introduced by the Spanish missionaries. Among the potsherds picked up at this ruin was a small piece of coarsely made clay tube, which seemed to be too large and too roughly modeled to have been the handle of a ladle, which it roughly resembled, or to have belonged to any other known form of domestic pottery. As a roof drain its use would not accord with the restrictions referred to in the native account, as the piece had been burnt.
155 It’s said that clay tubes were used at Awatubi long ago for roof drains, but there’s no solid evidence supporting this. Three types of this device are associated with the people of that village. Some are reported to have been made of wood, others of stone, and some from sun-dried clay. The local explanation for using sun-dried clay instead of the more durable baked version was that applying fire to anything that water flows through might dry up the rain. It was mentioned that nowadays, the corn cobs used for planting aren’t burned until it rains on the crop. If the clay spout described actually existed among the people of Awatubi, it probably was an innovation introduced by the Spanish missionaries. Among the potsherds found at this ruin was a small piece of a rough clay tube, which seemed too large and too crudely shaped to be a ladle handle, which it superficially resembled, or to belong to any other known type of household pottery. As a roof drain, its use wouldn’t align with the restrictions mentioned in the local account, since the piece had been fired.
In some cases in Zuñi where drains discharge from the roofs of upper terraces directly upon those below, the lower roofs and also the adjoining vertical walls are protected by thin tablets of stone, as shown in Fig. 44. It will be seen that one of these is placed upon the lower roof in such a position that the drainage falls directly upon it. Where the adobe roof covering is left unprotected its destruction by the rain is very rapid, as the showers of the rainy season in these regions, though usually of short duration, are often extremely violent. The force of the torrents is illustrated in the neighboring country. Here small ruts in the surface of the ground are rapidly converted into large arroyos. Frequently ordinary wagon tracks along a bit of valley slope serve as an initial channel to the rapidly accumulating waters and are eaten 156 away in a few weeks so that the road becomes wholly impassable, and must be abandoned for a new one alongside.
In some areas of Zuñi, where drainage from the roofs of higher terraces flows directly onto the lower ones, the roofs and adjacent vertical walls are safeguarded by thin stone slabs, as shown in Fig. 44. You’ll notice that one of these slabs is placed on the lower roof so that the drainage hits it directly. When the adobe roof isn't protected, it deteriorates quickly from the rain, as the rainstorms in these parts, while usually brief, can be extremely intense. The strength of the downpours is evident in the surrounding area. Here, small grooves in the ground rapidly become large arroyos. Often, regular wagon tracks along a sloped valley start to channel the swiftly gathering water, washing away in just a few weeks, making the road completely impassable and forcing the abandonment of the old route for a new one nearby. 156
Fig. 44. Zuñi roof drain, with splash stones on roof below.
Fig. 44. Zuñi roof drain, featuring splash stones on the roof below.
The shiftlessness of the native builders in the use of the more convenient material brings its own penalty during this season in a necessity for constant watchfulness and frequent repairs to keep the houses habitable. One can often see in Zuñi where an inefficient drain or a broken coping has given the water free access to the face of a plastered wall, carrying away all its covering and exposing in a vertical space the jagged stones of the underlying masonry. It is noticeable that much more attention has been paid to protective devices at Zuñi than at Tusayan. This is undoubtedly due to the prevalent use of adobe in the former. This friable material must be protected at all vulnerable points with slabs of stone in order quickly to divert the water and preserve the roofs and walls from destruction.
The laziness of the local builders in using more convenient materials comes at a cost during this season, requiring constant vigilance and frequent repairs to keep the houses livable. In Zuñi, you can often see where a poorly functioning drain or a damaged coping has allowed water to seep into a plastered wall, stripping away its covering and exposing the rough stones of the underlying masonry. It's noticeable that more attention has been given to protective measures in Zuñi compared to Tusayan. This is likely because adobe is more commonly used in the former. This fragile material needs to be protected at all vulnerable points with stone slabs to quickly redirect water and prevent damage to the roofs and walls.
LADDERS AND STEPS.
In the inclosed court of the old fortress pueblos the first terrace was reached only by means of ladders, but the terraces or rooms above this were reached both by ladders and steps. The removal of the lower tier of ladders thus gave security against intrusion and attack. The builders of Tusayan have preserved this primitive arrangement in much greater purity than those of Cibola.
In the enclosed courtyard of the old fortress pueblos, the first terrace could only be accessed using ladders, while the terraces or rooms above could be reached by both ladders and steps. Taking away the lower set of ladders provided protection against intrusions and attacks. The builders of Tusayan have maintained this basic setup in a much more authentic form than those of Cibola.
In Zuñi numerous ladders are seen on every terrace, but the purpose of these, on the highest terraces, is not to provide access to the rooms of the upper story, which always have external doors opening on the terraces, but to facilitate repairs of the roofs. At Tusayan, on the 157 other hand, ladders are of rare occurrence above the first terrace, their place being supplied by flights of stone steps. The relative scarcity of stone at Zuñi, suitable for building material, and its great abundance at Tusayan, undoubtedly account for this difference of usage, especially as the proximity of the timber supply of the Zuñi mountains to the former facilitates the substitution of wood for steps of masonry.
In Zuñi, you can see a lot of ladders on every terrace, but the ones on the highest terraces aren't meant to provide access to the rooms on the upper floor, which always have external doors leading to the terraces. Instead, they're there to help with roof repairs. In Tusayan, on the other hand, ladders are rarely seen above the first terrace; instead, there are flights of stone steps. The limited availability of suitable building stone in Zuñi and the abundant supply at Tusayan likely explain this difference in usage, especially since the nearby timber supply from the Zuñi mountains makes it easier to use wood for steps instead of masonry.
The earliest form of ladder among the pueblos was probably a notched log, a form still occasionally used. Figures 45 and 46 illustrate examples of this type of ladder from Tusayan.
The earliest version of a ladder used by the pueblos was likely a notched log, a style that is still used sometimes. Figures 45 and 46 show examples of this type of ladder from Tusayan.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 45. A modern notched ladder in Oraibi. | Fig. 46. Tusayan notched ladders from Mashongnavi. |
158 A notched ladder from Oraibi, made with a modern axe, is shown. This specimen has a squareness of outline and an evenness of surface not observed in the ancient examples. The ladder from Mashongnavi, illustrated on the left of Fig. 46, closely resembles the Oraibi specimen, though the workmanship is somewhat ruder. The example illustrated on the right of the same figure is from Oraibi. This ladder is very old, and its present rough and weatherbeaten surface affords but little evidence of the character of the implement used in making it.
158 A notched ladder from Oraibi, made with a modern axe, is shown. This piece has a square outline and a smooth surface, which you don't see in the ancient versions. The ladder from Mashongnavi, shown on the left of Fig. 46, looks a lot like the Oraibi one, but the craftsmanship is a bit rougher. The example on the right in the same figure is also from Oraibi. This ladder is very old, and its current rough and weathered surface gives little indication of the quality of the tools that were used to make it.
The ladder having two poles connected by cross rungs is undoubtedly a native invention, and was probably developed through a series of improvements on the primitive notched type. It is described in detail in the earliest Spanish accounts. Fig. 47 illustrates on the left the notched ladder, and on the right a typical two-pole ladder in its most primitive form. In this case the rungs are simply lashed to the uprights. The center ladder of the diagram is a Mandan device illustrated by Mr. Lewis H. Morgan.6 As used by the Mandans this ladder is placed with its forked end on the ground, the reverse of the Pueblo practice. It will readily be seen, on comparing these examples, that an elongation of the fork which occurs as a constant accompaniment of the notched ladder might eventually suggest a construction similar to that of the Mandan ladder reversed. The function of the fork on the notched ladder in steadying it when placed against the wall would be more effectually performed by enlarging this feature.
The ladder, made up of two poles connected by cross rungs, is definitely a homegrown invention and likely evolved from basic notched designs. It’s described in detail in the earliest Spanish accounts. Fig. 47 shows on the left the notched ladder, and on the right a typical two-pole ladder in its simplest form. In this example, the rungs are just tied to the poles. The center ladder in the diagram is a Mandan design illustrated by Mr. Lewis H. Morgan.6 When used by the Mandans, this ladder is positioned with its forked end on the ground, which is the opposite of how the Pueblo people do it. It's clear upon comparing these examples that an extended fork, which is a regular feature of the notched ladder, could eventually lead to a design similar to the inverted Mandan ladder. The fork on the notched ladder helps stabilize it when leaned against a wall, and this function would be even better served by enlarging this feature.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 47. Aboriginal American forms of ladder. |
159 At one stage in the development of the form of ladder in common use to-day the rungs were laid in depressions or notches of the vertical poles, resembling the larger notches of the single ladder, and then lashed on with thongs of rawhide or with other materials. Later, when the use of iron became known, holes were burned through the side poles. This is the nearly universal practice to-day, though some of the more skillful pueblo carpenters manage to chisel out rectangular holes. The piercing of the side poles, particularly prevalent in Zuni, has brought about a curious departure from the ancient practice of removing the ladder in times of threatened danger. Long rungs are loosely slipped into the holes in the side pieces, and the security formerly gained by taking up the entire ladder is now obtained, partially at least, by the removal of the rungs. The boring of the side pieces and the employment of loose rungs seriously interferes with the stability of the structure, as means must be provided to prevent the spreading apart of the side pieces. The Zuni architect has met this difficulty by prolonging the poles of the ladder and attaching a cross piece near their upper ends to hold them together. As a rule this cross piece is provided with a hole near each end into which the tapering extremities of the poles are inserted. From their high position near the extremities of the ladders, seen in silhouette against the sky, they form peculiarly striking features of Zuni. They are frequently decorated with rude carvings of terraced notches. Examples of this device may be seen in the views of Zuni, and several typical specimens are illustrated in detail in Pl. XCVIII. The use of cross pieces on ladders emerging from roof openings is not so common as on external ones, as there is not the same necessity for holding together the poles, the sides of the opening performing that office.
159 At one point in the evolution of the ladder commonly used today, the rungs were placed in notches in the vertical poles, similar to the larger notches of a simple ladder, and then secured with rawhide thongs or other materials. Later, after iron became available, holes were burned through the side poles. This is the nearly standard practice today, although some skilled pueblo carpenters manage to carve out rectangular holes. The piercing of the side poles, particularly common in Zuni, led to an interesting shift from the old practice of removing the ladder during times of danger. Long rungs are loosely inserted into the holes in the side pieces, and the security that was once achieved by taking up the entire ladder is now partially obtained by removing the rungs. The boring of the side pieces and the use of loose rungs significantly affect the stability of the structure, since measures must be taken to prevent the side pieces from spreading apart. The Zuni architect has addressed this issue by extending the poles of the ladder and adding a cross piece near the top to hold them together. Usually, this cross piece has a hole near each end where the tapered ends of the poles are inserted. From their elevated position at the ends of the ladders, silhouetted against the sky, they create uniquely striking features of Zuni. They are often decorated with simple carvings of terraced notches. Examples of this design can be seen in the views of Zuni, and several typical specimens are illustrated in Pl. XCVIII. The use of cross pieces on ladders coming out of roof openings is less common than on external ladders, as there is less need to hold the poles together since the sides of the opening serve that purpose.
There are two places in Zuni, portions of the densest house cluster, where the needs of unusual traffic have been met by the employment of double ladders, made of three vertical poles, which accommodate two tiers of rungs. The sticks forming the rungs are inserted in continuous lengths through all three poles, and the cross pieces at the top are also continuous, being formed of a single flat piece of wood perforated by three holes for the reception of the tips of the poles. In additional to the usual cross pieces pierced for the reception of the side poles and rudely carved into ornamental forms, many temporary cross pieces are added during the harvest season in the early autumn to support the strips of meat and melons, strings of red peppers, and other articles dried in the open air prior to storage for winter use. At this season every device that will serve this purpose is employed. Occasionally poles are seen extending across the reentering angles of a house or are supported on the coping and rafters. The projecting roof beams also are similarly utilized at this season.
There are two areas in Zuni, parts of the densest cluster of houses, where the needs of unusual traffic have been addressed with double ladders made from three vertical poles, which hold two levels of rungs. The sticks that make up the rungs are threaded through all three poles in continuous lengths, and the cross pieces at the top are also continuous, made from a single flat piece of wood with three holes for the poles' tips. In addition to the usual cross pieces, which have holes for the side poles and are roughly carved into decorative shapes, many temporary cross pieces are added during the harvest season in early autumn to hold strips of meat and melons, strings of red peppers, and other items that need to dry in the open air before being stored for winter use. During this time, every method that can help with this task is used. Occasionally, poles can be seen extending across the corners of a house or resting on the coping and rafters. The projecting roof beams are also used in similar ways during this season.
Zuni ladders are usually provided with about eight rungs, but a few have as many as twelve. The women ascend these ladders carrying ollas of water on their heads, children play upon them, and a few of the 160 most expert of the numerous dogs that infest the village can clumsily make their way up and down them. As described in a previous section all houses built during the year are consecrated at a certain season, and among other details of the ceremonial, certain rites, intended to prevent accidents to children, etc., are performed at the foot of the ladders.
Zuni ladders usually have about eight rungs, but some have as many as twelve. The women climb these ladders with water jars on their heads, children play on them, and a few of the many dogs that roam the village can awkwardly navigate up and down. As mentioned earlier, all houses built during the year are consecrated at a specific time, and as part of the ceremony, certain rites are performed at the bottom of the ladders to prevent accidents to children and others.
In Tusayan, where stone is abundant, the ladder has not reached the elaborate development seen in Zuñi. The perforated cross piece is rarely seen, as there is little necessity for its adoption. The side poles are held together by the top and bottom rungs, which pass entirely through the side pieces and are securely fixed, while the ends of the others are only partly embedded in the side pieces. In other cases (Pl. XXXII) the poles are rigidly held in place by ropes or rawhide lashings.
In Tusayan, where stone is plentiful, the ladder hasn't evolved as much as it has in Zuñi. The perforated crosspiece is not commonly used, since there's not much need for it. The side poles are kept together by the top and bottom rungs, which go all the way through the side pieces and are firmly secured, while the ends of the other rungs are only partially inserted into the side pieces. In other cases (Pl. XXXII), the poles are tightly secured with ropes or rawhide bindings.
Short ladders whose side poles are but little prolonged beyond the top rung are of common occurrence, particularly in Oraibi. Three such ladders are shown in Pl. LXXXIV. A similar example may be seen in Pl. CVII, in connection with a large opening closed with rough masonry. In these cases the rungs are made to occupy slight notches or depressions in the upright poles and are then firmly lashed with rawhide, forming a fairly rigid structure. This type of ladder is probably a survival of the earliest form of the pueblo ladder.
Short ladders with side poles that extend only a little beyond the top rung are quite common, especially in Oraibi. Three of these ladders are shown in Pl. L84. A similar example can be seen in Pl. CVII, related to a large opening that is closed with rough masonry. In these cases, the rungs fit into slight notches or indentations in the upright poles and are then securely tied with rawhide, creating a fairly sturdy structure. This type of ladder likely dates back to the earliest version of the pueblo ladder.
Plate XCVIII. Cross-pieces on Zuñi ladders.
Plate XCVIII. Cross-pieces on Zuñi ladders.
In addition to the high cross piece whose function is to retain in place the vertical poles, the kiva ladders are usually provided, both in Zuñi and Tusayan, with a cross piece consisting of a round stick tied to the uprights and placed at a uniform height above the kiva roof. This stick affords a handhold for the marked dancers who are often encumbered with ceremonial paraphernalia as they enter the kiva. In the case of the Oraibi kiva occupying the foreground of Pl. XXXVIII, it may be seen that this handhold cross piece is inserted into holes in the side poles, an exception to the general practice. In Pl. LXXXVII, illustrating kivas, the position of this feature will be seen.
In addition to the high cross piece that keeps the vertical poles in place, the kiva ladders in both Zuñi and Tusayan usually have a cross piece made of a round stick tied to the uprights and set at a consistent height above the kiva roof. This stick provides a handhold for the dancers, who often carry ceremonial items as they enter the kiva. In the case of the Oraibi kiva shown at Pl. XXXVIII, you can see that this handhold cross piece is inserted into holes in the side poles, which is different from the usual practice. In Pl. 87, illustrating kivas, you can see the position of this feature.
Plate XCIX. Outside steps at Pescado.
Plate XCIX. Outside steps at Pescado.
The exceptional mode of access to Tusayan kiva hatchways by means of short nights of stone steps has already been noticed. In several instances the top steps of these short flights cover the thickness of the wall. The remains of a similar stairway were observed in Pueblo Bonito, where it evidently reached directly from the ground to an external doorway. Access by such means, however, is a departure from the original defensive idea.
The unique way to access Tusayan kiva hatchways through short stone steps has already been noted. In some cases, the top steps of these short flights go right over the thickness of the wall. Similar stairs were found at Pueblo Bonito, where they clearly connected directly from the ground to an external doorway. However, this method of access departs from the original defensive concept.
Fig. 48. Stone steps at Oraibi, with platform at corner.
Fig. 48. Stone steps at Oraibi, with a platform at the corner.
Modern practice in Zuñi has departed more widely from the primitive system than at Tusayan. In the former pueblo short nights of stone steps giving access to doors raised but a short distance above the ground are very commonly seen. Even in the small farming pueblo of Pescado two examples of this arrangement are met with. Pl. XCIX illustrates one of these found on the north outside wall. In the general views of the Tusayan villages the closer adherence to primitive methods is 161 clearly indicated, although the modern compare very unfavorably with the ancient examples in precision of execution. Pl. XXXII illustrates two flights of stone steps of Shupaulovi. In many cases the workmanship of these stone steps does not surpass that seen in the Walpi trail, illustrated in Pl. XXV.
Modern practices in Zuñi have strayed further from the primitive system than in Tusayan. In the former pueblo, it's common to see short stone steps leading up to doors that are only slightly elevated from the ground. Even in the small farming pueblo of Pescado, there are two examples of this setup. Pl. 99 shows one of these found on the north outside wall. In the overall views of the Tusayan villages, the closer adherence to primitive methods is 161 clearly evident, although the modern structures contrast poorly with the ancient examples in terms of execution quality. Pl. XXXII illustrates two flights of stone steps from Shupaulovi. In many instances, the craftsmanship of these stone steps does not exceed that seen in the Walpi trail, illustrated in Pl. XXV.
Fig. 49. Stone steps, with platform at chimney, in Oraibi.
Fig. 49. Stone steps with a platform at the chimney in Oraibi.
![]() |
Fig. 50. Stone steps in Shumopavi. |
162 Perhaps in no one detail of pueblo construction are the careless and shiftless modern methods so conspicuous as in the stone steps of the upper terraces of Tusayan. Here are seen many awkward makeshifts by means of which the builders have tried to compensate for their lack of foresight in planning. The absence of a definite plan for a house cluster of many rooms, already noted in the discussion of dwelling-house construction, is rendered conspicuous by the manner in which the stone stairways are used. Figs. 48 and 49 illustrate stone steps on upper terraces in Oraibi. In both cases the steps have been added long after the rooms against which they abut were built. In order to conform to the fixed requirement of placing such means of access at the corners of the upper rooms, the builders constructed a clumsy platform to afford passage around the previously built chimney. Fig. 50 shows the result of a similar lack of foresight. The upper portion of the flight, consisting of three steps, has been abruptly turned at right angles to the main flight, and is supported upon rude poles and beams. The restriction of this feature to the corners of upper rooms where they were most likely to conflict with chimneys is undoubtedly a survival of ancient practice, and due to the necessary vertical alignment of walls and masonry in this primitive construction.
162 In no aspect of pueblo construction are the careless and haphazard modern methods more obvious than in the stone steps of the upper terraces of Tusayan. Here, we see many awkward fixes that the builders implemented to make up for their lack of planning. The absence of a clear plan for a house cluster with multiple rooms, already mentioned in the discussion of dwelling-house construction, is particularly evident in how the stone stairways are used. Figs. 48 and 49 show stone steps on the upper terraces in Oraibi. In both cases, the steps were added long after the adjacent rooms were built. To meet the requirement of placing these access points at the corners of the upper rooms, the builders created a clumsy platform to navigate around the previously built chimney. Fig. 50 illustrates the outcome of a similar lack of foresight. The upper part of the staircase, which has three steps, takes a sharp turn at a right angle to the main staircase and is supported by rough poles and beams. This feature being limited to the corners of upper rooms, where they were most likely to interfere with chimneys, is likely a remnant of ancient practices, stemming from the need for vertical alignment of walls and masonry in this basic construction.
COOKING PITS AND OVENS.
Most of the cooking of the ancient Pueblos was probably done out of doors, as among the ruins vestiges of cooking pits, almost identical in 163 character with those still found in Tusayan, are frequently seen. In Cibola the large dome-shaped ovens, common to the Pueblos of the Rio Grande and to their Mexican neighbors are in general use. In Tusayan a few examples of this form of oven occur upon the roofs of the terraces, while the cooking pit in a variety of forms is still extensively used.
Most of the cooking by the ancient Pueblos likely took place outdoors, as the ruins show signs of cooking pits that are almost identical to those still found in Tusayan. In Cibola, the large dome-shaped ovens that are common in the Pueblos of the Rio Grande and among their Mexican neighbors are widely used. In Tusayan, a few of these ovens can be seen on the roofs of the terraces, while cooking pits in various forms are still commonly used.
![]() |
Fig. 51.
A series of cooking pits in Mashongnavi. |
The distribution of the dome-shaped ovens in Cibola and in Tusayan may be seen on the ground plans in Chapters III and IV. The simplest form of cooking pit, still commonly used in Tusayan, consists of a depression in the ground, lined with a coating of mud. The pit is usually of small size and is commonly placed at some little distance from the house; in a few cases it is located in a sheltered corner of the building. Fig. 51 illustrates a series of three such primitive ovens built against a house wall, in a low bench or ledge of masonry raised 6 inches above the ground; the holes measure about a foot across and are about 18 or 20 inches deep. Many similar pits occur in the Tusayan villages; some of them are walled in with upright stone slabs, whose rough edges project 6 or 8 inches above the ground, the result closely resembling the ancient form of in-door fireplace, such as that seen in a room of Kin-tiel. (Pl. C.)
The layout of the dome-shaped ovens in Cibola and Tusayan can be found in the floor plans in Chapters III and IV. The simplest type of cooking pit, still commonly found in Tusayan, is just a depression in the ground lined with mud. These pits are usually small and often located a little distance from the house; in some cases, they are found in a sheltered corner of the building. Fig. 51 shows a set of three of these basic ovens built against a house wall, on a low ledge of masonry that is 6 inches above the ground; the holes are about a foot wide and around 18 to 20 inches deep. Many similar pits can be seen in the Tusayan villages; some are surrounded by upright stone slabs, with their rough edges sticking up 6 or 8 inches above the ground, closely resembling the ancient type of indoor fireplace, like the one seen in a room of Kin-tiel. (Pl. C.)
Plate C. An excavated room at Kin-tiel.
Plate C. A dug-out room at Kin-tiel.
![]() |
|
Fig. 52. Pi-gummi ovens of Mashongnavi. | |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 53.
Cross sections of pi-gummi ovens of Mashongnavi. |
164 These occur on the east side of Mashongnavi. They project 6 or 8 inches above the ground, and have a depth of from 18 to 24 inches. The débris scattered about the pits indicates the manner in which they are covered with slabs of stone and sealed with mud when in use. In all the oven, devices of the pueblos the interior is first thoroughly heated by a long continued fire within, the structure. When the temperature is sufficiently high the ashes and dirt are cleaned out, the articles to be cooked inserted, and the orifices sealed. The food is often left in these heated receptacles for 12 hours or more, and on removal it is generally found to be very nicely cooked. Each of the pi-gummi ovens illustrated above is provided with a tube-like orifice 3 or 4 inches in diameter, descending obliquely from the ground level into the cavity. Through this opening the fire is arranged and kept in order, and in this respect it seems to be the counterpart of the smaller hole of the Zuñi dome-shaped ovens. When the principal opening, by which the vessel containing the pi-gummi or other articles is introduced, has been covered with a slab of stone and sealed with mud, the effect is similar to that of the dome-shaped oven when the ground-opening or doorway is hermetically closed.
164 These are located on the east side of Mashongnavi. They stick out 6 to 8 inches above the ground and are 18 to 24 inches deep. The debris around the pits shows how they're covered with stone slabs and sealed with mud when in use. In all the pueblos' ovens, the inside is first heated thoroughly by a long-lasting fire within the structure. Once the temperature gets high enough, the ashes and dirt are removed, the food items are placed inside, and the openings are sealed. The food is often left in these heated containers for 12 hours or more, and when taken out, it’s usually perfectly cooked. Each of the pi-gummi ovens shown above has a tube-like opening 3 to 4 inches in diameter that slopes down from ground level into the cavity. This opening is used to set up and maintain the fire, and in this way, it resembles the smaller opening of the Zuñi dome-shaped ovens. When the main opening, through which the vessel containing the pi-gummi or other items is placed, is covered with a stone slab and sealed with mud, it creates a similar effect to that of the dome-shaped oven when its ground opening or doorway is tightly closed.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Fig. 54.
Diagram showing foundation stones of a Zuñi oven. |
No example of the dome-shaped oven of pre-Columbian origin has been found among the pueblo ruins, although its prototype probably existed in ancient times, possibly in the form of a kiln for baking a fine quality of pottery formerly manufactured. However, the cooking pit alone, developed to the point of the pi-gummi oven of Tusayan, may have been the stem upon which the foreign idea was engrafted. Instances of the complete adoption by these conservative people of a wholly foreign idea or feature of construction are not likely to be found, as improvements are almost universally confined to the mere modification of existing devices. In the few instances in which more radical changes are attempted the resulting forms bear evidence of the fact.
No examples of the dome-shaped ovens from pre-Columbian times have been found among the pueblo ruins, but a prototype likely existed in ancient times, possibly as a kiln for making high-quality pottery that was produced back then. However, the cooking pit, which evolved into the pi-gummi oven of Tusayan, might have been the basis for this foreign concept. It's unlikely to find instances of these traditional people fully adopting a completely foreign idea or construction feature, as improvements typically focus on simply modifying existing devices. In the few cases where more drastic changes are attempted, the resulting designs clearly reflect that fact.
In Cibola the construction of a dome-shaped oven is begun by laying out roughly a circle of flat stones as a foundation. Upon these the 165 upper structure is rudely built of stones laid in the mud and approximately in the courses, though often during construction one side will be carried considerably higher than another. The walls curve inward to an apparently unsafe degree, but the mud mortar is often allowed to partly dry before carrying the overhanging portion so far as to endanger the structure, and accidents rarely happen. The oven illustrated in Pl. XCVII shows near its broken doorway the arrangement of foundation stones referred to. Typical examples of the dome oven occur in the foreground of the general view of Zuñi shown in Pl. LXXVIII.
In Cibola, the building of a dome-shaped oven starts by laying out a roughly circular foundation of flat stones. On top of these, the upper structure is roughly constructed with stones set in mud, and the layers are somewhat aligned, although often one side ends up being significantly higher than the other during construction. The walls curve inward to what seems like an unsafe angle, but the mud mortar is typically allowed to partially dry before extending the overhanging part to a point where it could compromise the structure. Accidents are rare. The oven shown in Pl. XCVII illustrates the layout of the foundation stones mentioned. Typical examples of the dome oven can be seen in the foreground of the general view of Zuñi depicted in Pl. L78.
Fig. 55. Dome-shaped oven on a plinth of masonry.
Fig. 55. Dome-shaped oven on a brick base.
The dome ovens of Cibola are generally smoothly plastered, inside and out, but a few examples are seen in which the stones of the masonry are exposed. In. Pl. XCIX may be seen two ovens differing in size, one of which shows the manner in which the opening is blocked up with stone to keep out stray dogs during periods of disuse. Fig. 55 illustrates a mud-plastered oven at Pescado, which is elevated about a foot above the ground on a base or plinth of masonry. The opening of this oven is on the side toward the houses. This form is quite exceptional in Cibola, though of frequent occurrence among the Rio Grande pueblos. A very large and carefully finished example was examined at Jemez.
The dome ovens in Cibola are usually smoothly plastered inside and out, but there are a few examples where the stones of the masonry are left exposed. In Pl. XCIX, you can see two ovens of different sizes, one of which shows how the opening is blocked with stones to keep out stray dogs when it's not in use. Fig. 55 shows a mud-plastered oven at Pescado that stands about a foot above the ground on a masonry base or plinth. The opening of this oven faces the houses. This design is quite rare in Cibola, though it's common among the Rio Grande pueblos. A very large and well-finished example was found at Jemez.
Fig. 56. Oven in Pescado exposing stones of masonry.
Fig. 56. Oven in Pescado showing masonry stones.
Figs. 56 and 57 illustrate two specimens of rough masonry ovens seen at Pescado. In one of these a decided horizontal arrangement of the stones in the masonry prevails. The specimen at the right is small and rudely constructed, showing but little care in the use of the building material. The few specimens of dome ovens seen in Tusayan are characterized by the same rudeness of construction noticed in their house masonry. The rarity of this oven at Tusayan, where so many of the constructions have retained a degree of primitiveness not seen elsewhere, is perhaps an additional evidence of its foreign origin.
Figs. 56 and 57 illustrate two examples of rough masonry ovens found at Pescado. In one of these, the stones in the masonry are arranged horizontally. The oven on the right is small and crudely built, showing little care in the use of materials. The few dome ovens seen in Tusayan share the same rough construction style noted in their house masonry. The rarity of this oven in Tusayan, where many structures still show a level of primitiveness not found elsewhere, might suggest that it has a foreign origin.
Fig. 57. Oven in Pescado exposing stones of masonry.
Fig. 57. Oven in Pescado showing masonry stones.
OVEN-SHAPED STRUCTURES.
In Tusayan, there are other structures, of rude dome-shape, likely to be mistaken for some form of cooking device. Fig. 58 illustrates two specimens of shrines that occur in courts of Mashongnavi. These are receptacles for plume sticks (bahos) and other votive offerings used at certain festivals, which, after being so used, are sealed up with stone slabs and adobe. These shrines occur at several of the villages, as noted in the discussion of the plans in Chapter III. In the foreground of Pl. XXXVIII may be seen an Oraibi specimen somewhat resembling those seen at Mashongnavi.
In Tusayan, there are other dome-shaped structures that could easily be confused with some kind of cooking device. Fig. 58 shows two examples of shrines found in the courts of Mashongnavi. These serve as containers for plume sticks (bahos) and other ritual offerings used during specific festivals. After their use, they are sealed with stone slabs and adobe. These shrines can be found in several villages, as mentioned in the discussion of the plans in Chapter III. In the foreground of Pl. XXXVIII, you can see an Oraibi example that looks somewhat like those at Mashongnavi.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Fig. 58. Shrines in Mashongnavi. | Fig. 59. A poultry house in Sichumovi resembling an oven. |
Fig. 59 illustrates a very rude structure of stones in Sichumovi, resembling in form a dome oven, which is used as a poultry house. Several of these are seen in the Tusayan villages.
Fig. 59 shows a very rough arrangement of stones in Sichumovi, shaped like a dome oven, which is used as a chicken coop. You can find several of these in the Tusayan villages.
FIREPLACES AND CHIMNEYS.
The original fireplace of the ancient pueblo builders was probably the simple cooking pit transferred to a position within the dwelling room, and employed for the lighter cooking of the family as well as for warming 168 the dwelling. It was placed in the center of the floor in order that the occupants of the house might conveniently gather around it. One of the first improvements made in this shallow indoor cooking pit must have consisted in surrounding it with a wall of sufficient height to protect the fire against drafts, as seen in the outdoor pits of Tusayan. In excavating a room in the ancient pueblo of Kin-tiel, a completely preserved fireplace, about a foot deep, and walled in with thin slabs of stone set on edge, was brought to light. The depression had been hollowed out of the solid rock.
The original fireplace of the ancient pueblo builders was likely just a simple cooking pit moved inside the living room, used for lighter family cooking as well as for heating the home. It was placed in the center of the floor so that everyone in the house could easily gather around it. One of the first upgrades to this shallow indoor cooking pit would have been adding a wall of enough height to shield the fire from drafts, similar to the outdoor pits in Tusayan. When excavating a room in the ancient pueblo of Kin-tiel, a perfectly preserved fireplace, about a foot deep and surrounded by thin stone slabs set on edge, was discovered. The depression had been carved out of solid rock. 168
This fireplace, together with the room in which it was found, is illustrated in Pl. C and Fig. 60. It is of rectangular form, but other examples have been found which are circular. Mr. W. H. Jackson describes a fireplace in a cliff dwelling in “Echo Cave” that consisted of a circular, basin-like depression 30 inches across and 10 inches deep. Rooms furnishing evidence that fires were made in the corners against the walls are found in many cliff dwellings; the smoke escaped overhead, and the blackened walls afford no trace of a chimney or flue of any kind.
This fireplace, along with the room it was in, is shown in Pl. C and Fig. 60. It has a rectangular shape, but other examples found are circular. Mr. W. H. Jackson describes a fireplace in a cliff dwelling in “Echo Cave” that was a circular, basin-like depression 30 inches wide and 10 inches deep. Many cliff dwellings have rooms with evidence that fires were made in the corners against the walls; the smoke escaped overhead, and the blackened walls show no signs of a chimney or flue at all.
Fig. 60. Ground plan of an excavated room in Kin-tiel.
Fig. 60. Floor plan of an unearthed room in Kin-tiel.
The pueblo chimney is undoubtedly a post-Spanish feature, and the best forms in use at the present time are probably of very recent origin, though they are still associated with fireplaces that have departed little from the aboriginal form seen at Kin-tiel and elsewhere. It is interesting to note, in this connection, that the ceremony consecrating the house is performed in Tusayan before the chimney is added, suggesting that the latter feature did not form a part of the aboriginal dwelling.
The pueblo chimney is clearly a post-Spanish addition, and the best designs being used today are likely quite new, even though they still relate to fireplaces that have changed little from the original style seen at Kin-tiel and other places. It's worth mentioning that the ceremony to bless the house takes place in Tusayan before the chimney is put in, which implies that this feature wasn't originally part of the native dwelling.
169 In Cibola a few distinct forms of chimney are used at the present time, but in the more remote Tusayan the chimney seems to be still in the experimental stage. Numbers of awkward constructions, varying from the ordinary cooking pit to the more elaborate hooded structures, testify to the chaotic condition of the chimney-building art in the latter province.
169 In Cibola, there are a few different types of chimneys being used today, but in the more isolated Tusayan, chimneys seem to still be in the testing phase. Many clumsy designs, ranging from basic cooking pits to more complex hooded structures, show the disorganized state of the chimney-building craft in that region.
Before the invention of a chimney hood, and while the primitive fireplace occupied a central position in the floor of the room, the smoke probably escaped through the door and window openings. Later a hole in the roof provided an exit, as in the kivas of to-day, where ceremonial use has perpetuated an arrangement long since superseded in dwelling-house construction. The comfort of a dwelling room provided with this feature is sufficiently attested by the popularity of the modern kivas as a resort for the men. The idea of a rude hood or flue to facilitate the egress of the smoke would not be suggested until the fireplace was transferred from the center of a room to a corner, and in the first adoption of this device the builders would rely upon the adjacent walls for the needed support of the constructional members. Practically all of the chimneys of Tusayan are placed in corners at the present time, though the Zuñi builders have developed sufficient skill to construct a rigid hood and flue in the center of a side wall, as may be seen in the view of a Zuñi interior, Pl. LXXXVI.
Before the invention of the chimney hood, when the basic fireplace was in the center of the room, smoke likely escaped through door and window openings. Later, a hole in the roof allowed smoke to exit, similar to today’s kivas, where ceremonial practices have kept this outdated design in use. The comfort of a room with this feature is evident in the popularity of modern kivas as hangout spots for men. The idea of a simple hood or flue to help smoke escape wouldn’t come up until the fireplace was moved from the center to a corner. Initially, builders would depend on the nearby walls for the necessary support of this structure. Nowadays, almost all chimneys in Tusayan are located in corners, but the Zuñi builders have developed the skill to create a sturdy hood and flue in the center of a side wall, as shown in the view of a Zuñi interior, Pl. L86.
Although the pueblo chimney owes its existence to foreign suggestion it has evidently reached its present form through a series of timid experiments, and the proper principles of its construction seem to have been but feebly apprehended by the native builders, particularly in Tusayan. The early form of hood, shown in Fig. 66, was made by placing a short supporting pole across the corner of a room at a sufficient distance from the floor and upon it arranging sticks to form the frame work of a contracting hood or flue. The whole construction was finally covered with a thick coating of mud. This primitive wooden construction has probably been in use for a long time, although it was modified in special cases so as to extend across the entire width of narrow rooms to accommodate “piki” stones or other cumbersome cooking devices. It embodies the principle of roof construction that must have been employed in the primitive house from which the pueblo was developed, and practically constitutes a miniature conical roof suspended over the fireplace and depending upon the walls of the room for support. On account of the careful and economical use of fuel by these people the light and inflammable material of which the chimney is constructed does not involve the danger of combustion that would be expected. The perfect feasibility of such use of wood is well illustrated in some of the old log-cabin chimneys in the Southern States, where, however, the arrangement of the pieces is horizontal, not vertical. These latter curiously exemplify also the use of a miniature section of house construction to form a conduit for the smoke, placed at a sufficient height to admit of access to the fire.
Although the pueblo chimney came about due to outside influence, it has clearly evolved into its current form through a series of cautious experiments, and the underlying principles of its construction seem to have been only vaguely understood by the local builders, especially in Tusayan. The early design of the hood, shown in Fig. 66, was created by placing a short supporting pole across the corner of a room, high enough off the floor, and then arranging sticks on it to form the framework of a tapering hood or flue. The entire structure was ultimately covered with a thick layer of mud. This basic wooden design has likely been in use for quite some time, though it was modified in certain cases to span the entire width of narrow rooms to accommodate “piki” stones or other bulky cooking tools. It reflects the principle of roof construction that must have been used in the original house from which the pueblo developed, essentially acting as a small conical roof suspended over the fireplace and relying on the room's walls for support. Due to the careful and economical use of fuel by these people, the lightweight and flammable materials used for the chimney don’t pose the combustion risks one might expect. The successful use of wood is well demonstrated in some of the old log-cabin chimneys in the Southern States, where the arrangement of the pieces is horizontal rather than vertical. These also interestingly illustrate the use of a small section of house construction to create a smoke conduit, placed high enough to allow access to the fire.
![]() |
Fig. 61.
A corner chimney hood with two supporting poles (Tusayan). |
170 A further improvement in the chimney was the construction of a corner hood support by means of two short poles instead of a single piece, thus forming a rectangular smoke hood of enlarged capacity. This latter is the most common form in use at the present time in both provinces, but its arrangement in Tusayan, where it represents the highest achievement of the natives in chimney construction, is much more varied than in Cibola. In the latter province the same form is occasionally executed in stone. Fig. 61 illustrates a corner hood, in which the crossed ends of the supporting poles are exposed to view. The outer end of the lower pole is supported from the roof beams by a cord or rope, the latter being embedded in the mud plastering with which the hood is finished. The vertically ridged character of the surface reveals the underlying construction, in which light sticks have been used as a base for the plaster. The Tusayans say that large sunflower stalks are preferred for this purpose on account of their lightness. Figs. 63 and 64 show another Tusayan hood of the type described, and in Fig. 69 a large hood of the same general form, suspended over a piki-stone, is noticeable for the frank treatment of the suspending cords, which are clearly exposed to view for nearly their entire length.
170 Another improvement in the chimney was creating a corner hood support using two short poles instead of one piece, forming a rectangular smoke hood with larger capacity. This design is the most common one used today in both provinces, but its arrangement in Tusayan, where it represents the pinnacle of local chimney construction, is much more diverse than in Cibola. In the latter province, the same design is sometimes made of stone. Fig. 61 shows a corner hood where the crossed ends of the supporting poles are visible. The outer end of the lower pole is supported by a cord or rope from the roof beams, which is embedded in the mud plaster that covers the hood. The ridged surface of the hood shows the underlying structure, where lightweight sticks are used as a base for the plaster. The Tusayans prefer using large sunflower stalks for this because they are light. Figs. 63 and 64 depict another Tusayan hood of the same type, and in Fig. 69, a large hood of a similar design, hanging over a piki-stone, is notable for the straightforward exposure of the suspending cords, which are clearly visible for almost their entire length.
![]() |
Fig. 62.
A curved chimney hood of Mashongnavi. |
In a chimney in a Mashongnavi house, illustrated in Fig. 62, a simple, sharply curved piece of wood has been used for the lower rim of this hood, thus obtaining all the capacity of the two-poled form. The vertical sticks in this example are barely discernible through the plastering, which has been applied with more than the usual degree of care.
In a chimney of a Mashongnavi house, shown in Fig. 62, a straightforward, sharply curved piece of wood serves as the lower edge of this hood, achieving the full capacity of the two-poled shape. The vertical sticks in this example are hardly visible beneath the plaster, which has been applied with more than the usual attention to detail.
171 A curious example illustrating a rudimentary form of two-poled hood is shown in Fig. 63. A straight pole of unusual length is built into the walls across the corner of a room, and its insertion into the wall is much farther from the corner on one side than the other. From the longer stretch of inclosed wall protrudes a short pole that joins the principal one and serves as a support for one side of the chimney-hood. In this case the builder appears to have been too timid to venture on the bolder construction required in the perfected two-poled hood. This example probably represents a stage in the development of the higher form.
171 A curious example showing an early version of a two-poled hood is found in Fig. 63. A long straight pole is embedded in the walls at the corner of a room, and its placement is much farther from the corner on one side than on the other. From the longer section of enclosed wall, a short pole extends and connects to the main pole, acting as a support for one side of the chimney hood. In this case, the builder seems to have been too hesitant to attempt the more daring design needed for the refined two-poled hood. This example likely represents a stage in the evolution of the more advanced version.
![]() |
Fig. 63.
A Mashongnavi chimney hood and walled up fireplace. |
In some instances the rectangular corner hood is not suspended from the ceiling, but is supported from beneath by a stone slab or a piece of wood. Such a chimney hood seen in a house of Shupaulovi measures nearly 4 by 5 feet. The short side is supported by two stone slabs built into the wall and extending from the hood to the floor. Upon the upper stone rests one end of the wooden lintel supporting the long side, while the other end, near the corner of the room, is held in position by a light crotch of wood. Fig. 64 illustrates this hood; the plan indicating the relation of the stones and the forked stick to the corner of the room. Fig. 71, illustrating a terrace fireplace and chimney of Shumopavi, shows the employment of similar supports.
In some cases, the rectangular corner hood isn't hung from the ceiling but is instead supported from below by a stone slab or a piece of wood. This type of chimney hood, found in a house in Shupaulovi, measures almost 4 by 5 feet. The short side is held up by two stone slabs built into the wall, reaching from the hood down to the floor. One end of the wooden lintel that supports the long side rests on the upper stone, while the other end, near the corner of the room, is held in place by a light wooden fork. Fig. 64 shows this hood, with the plan illustrating the relationship of the stones and the forked stick to the corner of the room. Fig. 71, depicting a terrace fireplace and chimney from Shumopavi, demonstrates the use of similar supports.
![]() |
Fig. 64.
A chimney hood of Shupaulovi. |
The builders of Tusayan appear to have been afraid to add the necessary weight of mud mortar to produce this finished effect, the hoods usually showing a vertically ridged or crenated surface, caused by the sticks of the framework showing through the thin mud coat. Stone also is often employed in their construction, and its use has developed a large, square-headed type of chimney unknown at Tusayan. This is illustrated in Fig. 65. This form of hood, projecting some distance beyond its flue, affords space that may be used as a mantel-shelf, an advantage gained only to a very small degree by the forms discussed above. This chimney, as before stated, is built against one of the walls of a room, and near the middle.
The builders of Tusayan seem to have been hesitant to use enough mud mortar to achieve the desired finished look, as the hoods usually have a vertically ridged or crenated surface, which is caused by the framework sticks showing through the thin mud layer. Stone is often used in their construction, resulting in a large, square-headed type of chimney that isn't found in Tusayan. This is shown in Fig. 65. This type of hood, which extends quite a bit beyond its flue, provides space that can be used as a mantel-shelf—a benefit that only a very small degree is achieved by the hoods discussed earlier. As mentioned before, this chimney is built against one of the walls in a room and is located near the center.
![]() |
|
Fig. 65.
A semi-detached square chimney hood of Zuñi. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Fig. 66.
Unplastered Zuñi chimney hoods, illustrating construction. |
All the joints of these hoods, and even the material used, are generally concealed from view by a carefully applied coating of plaster, supplemented by a gypsum wash, and usually there is no visible evidence of the manner in which they are built, but the construction is little superior to that of the simple corner hoods. The method of framing the various types of hoods is illustrated in Fig. 66. The example on the left shows an unplastered wooden hood skeleton. The arrangement of the parts in projecting rectangular stone hoods is illustrated in the right-hand diagram of the figure. In constructing such a chimney a thin buttress is first built against the wall of sufficient width and 173 height to support one side of the hood. The opposite side of the hood is supported by a flat stone, firmly set on edge into the masonry of the wall. The front of the hood is supported by a second flat stone which rests at one end on a rude shoulder in the projecting slab, and at the other end upon the front edge of the buttress. It would be quite practicable for the pueblo builders to form a notch in the lower corner of the supported stone to rest firmly upon a projection of the supporting stone, but in the few cases in which the construction could be observed no such treatment was seen, for they depended mainly on the interlocking of the ragged ends of the stones. This structure serves to support the body of the flue, usually with an intervening stone-covered space forming a shelf. At the present period the flue is usually built of thin sandstone slabs, rudely adjusted to afford mutual support. The whole structure is bound together and smoothed over with mud plastering, and is finally finished with the gypsum wash, applied also to the rest of the room. Mr. A. F. Bandelier describes “a regular chimney, with mantel and shelf, built of stone slabs,” which he found “in the caves of the Rito de los Frijoles, as well as in the cliff dwellings of the regular detached family house type,”7 which, from the description, must have closely resembled the Zuñi chimney described above. Houses containing such devices may be quite old, but if so they were certainly reoccupied in post-Spanish times. Such dwellings are likely to have been used as places of refuge in times of danger up to a comparatively recent date.
All the joints of these hoods, and even the materials used, are usually hidden from view by a carefully applied layer of plaster along with a gypsum wash, and typically there’s no visible sign of how they’re built, but the construction is not much better than that of simple corner hoods. The method of framing the different types of hoods is shown in Fig. 66. The example on the left displays an unplastered wooden hood frame. The arrangement of parts in projecting rectangular stone hoods is shown in the diagram on the right side of the figure. When constructing such a chimney, a thin buttress is first built against the wall, wide and high enough to support one side of the hood. The opposite side of the hood is supported by a flat stone set firmly on edge in the wall's masonry. The front of the hood is held up by a second flat stone that rests at one end on a rough shoulder in the projecting slab and at the other end on the front edge of the buttress. It would be quite feasible for the pueblo builders to create a notch in the lower corner of the supported stone to sit firmly on a projection of the supporting stone, but in the few instances observed, no such technique was noted, as they relied mainly on the interlocking of the rough ends of the stones. This structure helps to support the flue body, typically with a stone-covered space in between forming a shelf. Nowadays, the flue is generally made of thin sandstone slabs, roughly adjusted to provide mutual support. The whole structure is secured and smoothed over with mud plaster and is ultimately finished with the gypsum wash, which is also applied to the rest of the room. Mr. A. F. Bandelier describes “a proper chimney, with mantel and shelf, made of stone slabs,” which he found “in the caves of the Rito de los Frijoles, as well as in the cliff dwellings of the regular detached family house type,” 7 which, based on his description, must have closely resembled the Zuñi chimney described earlier. Houses featuring such designs may be quite old, but if so, they were certainly reoccupied in post-Spanish times. These dwellings were likely used as safe havens in times of danger up until relatively recently.
![]() |
Fig. 67. A fireplace and mantel in Sichumovi. |
Among the many forms of chimneys and fireplaces seen in Tusayan a curious approach to our own arrangement of fireplace and mantel was noticed in a house in Sichumovi. In addition to the principal mantel ledge, a light wooden shelf was arranged against the wall on one side of the flue, one of its ends being supported by an upright piece of wood with a cap, and the other resting on a peg driven into the wall. This fireplace and mantel is illustrated in Fig. 67.
Among the various types of chimneys and fireplaces found in Tusayan, an interesting variation of our fireplace and mantel setup was observed in a house in Sichumovi. Alongside the main mantel ledge, there was a light wooden shelf mounted against the wall next to the flue, supported at one end by a vertical piece of wood with a cap, and the other end resting on a peg driven into the wall. This fireplace and mantel is illustrated in Fig. 67.
Aside from the peculiar “guyave” or “piki” baking oven, there is but little variation in the form of indoor fireplaces in Cibola, while in Tusayan it appears to have been subjected to about the same mutations 174 already noted in the outdoor cooking pits. A serious problem was encountered by the Tusayan builder when he was called upon to construct cooking-pit fireplaces, a foot or more deep, in a loom of an upper terrace. As it was impracticable to sink the pit into the floor, the necessary depth was obtained by walling up the sides, as is shown in Fig. 68, which illustrates a second-story fireplace in Mashongnavi. Other examples may be seen in the outdoor chimneys shown in Figs. 72 and 73.
Aside from the unusual “guyave” or “piki” baking oven, there isn’t much difference in the style of indoor fireplaces in Cibola. In Tusayan, it seems they experienced similar changes to those already mentioned about the outdoor cooking pits. The Tusayan builder faced a significant challenge when tasked with creating cooking-pit fireplaces that were at least a foot deep in the structure of an upper terrace. Since it wasn’t feasible to excavate the pit into the floor, they achieved the necessary depth by raising the sides, as illustrated in Fig. 68, which shows a second-story fireplace in Mashongnavi. Additional examples can be seen in the outdoor chimneys depicted in Figs. 72 and 73.
![]() |
Fig. 68.
A second-story fireplace in Mashongnavi. |
175 A modification of the interior fireplace designed for cooking the thin, paper-like bread, known to the Spanish-speaking peoples of this region as “guyave,” and by the Tusayan as “piki,” is common to both Cibola and Tusayan, though in the former province the contrivance is more carefully constructed than in the latter, and the surface of the baking stone itself is more highly finished. In the guyave oven a tablet of carefully prepared sandstone is supported in a horizontal position by two slabs set on edge and firmly imbedded in the floor. A horizontal flue is thus formed in which the fire is built. The upper stone, whose surface is to receive the thin guyave batter, undergoes during its original preparation a certain treatment with fire and piñon gum, and perhaps other ingredients, which imparts to it a highly polished black finish. This operation is usually performed away from the pueblo, near a point where suitable stone is found, and is accompanied by a ceremonial, which is intended to prevent the stone from breaking on exposure to the fire when first used. During one stage of these rites the strictest silence is enjoined, as, according to the native account, a single word spoken at such a time would crack the tablet.
175 A modified interior fireplace designed for cooking the thin, paper-like bread, known to Spanish-speaking people in this area as “guyave,” and referred to as “piki” by the Tusayan, is found in both Cibola and Tusayan. However, in Cibola, the structure is constructed with more care than in Tusayan, and the baking stone's surface is more finely finished. In the guyave oven, a tablet made of carefully prepared sandstone is held horizontally by two slabs set on edge and firmly embedded in the floor. This creates a horizontal flue where the fire is built. The upper stone, which will hold the thin guyave batter, is treated with fire and piñon gum, and possibly other materials during its initial preparation, giving it a highly polished black finish. This process usually takes place away from the pueblo, near a location where suitable stone can be found, and includes a ceremony intended to prevent the stone from breaking when exposed to fire for the first time. At one stage of these rituals, complete silence is required, as the local belief suggests that even one word spoken during this time could crack the tablet.
![]() |
Fig. 69.
Piki stone and chimney hood in Sichumovi. |
When the long guyave stone is in position upon the edges of the back and front stones the fire must be so applied as to maintain the stone at a uniform temperature. This is done by frequent feeding with small bits of sage brush or other fuel. The necessity for such economy in the use of fuel has to a certain extent affected the forms of all the heating and cooking devices. Fig. 69 illustrates a Sichumovi piki stone, and Fig. 70 shows the use of the oven in connection with a cooking fireplace, a combination that is not uncommon. The latter example 176 is from Shumopavi. The illustration shows an interesting feature in the use of a primitive andiron or boss to support the cooking pot in position above the fire. This boss is modeled from the same clay as the fireplace floor and is attached to it and forms a part of it. Mr. Stephen has collected free specimens of these primitive props which had never been attached to the floor. These were of the rudely conical form illustrated in the figure, and were made of a coarsely mixed clay thoroughly baked to a stony hardness.
When the long guyave stone is placed on the edges of the back and front stones, the fire needs to be managed to keep the stone at a consistent temperature. This is achieved by regularly adding small pieces of sagebrush or other fuel. The need to use fuel efficiently has influenced the designs of all heating and cooking devices. Fig. 69 illustrates a Sichumovi piki stone, and Fig. 70 shows the oven being used alongside a cooking fireplace, which is a common combination. The latter example 176 is from Shumopavi. The illustration features an interesting aspect of using a primitive andiron or boss to hold the cooking pot above the fire. This boss is made from the same clay as the fireplace floor, attached to it and considered a part of it. Mr. Stephen has collected free specimens of these primitive props that were never attached to the floor. These were in a crude conical shape, as shown in the figure, and were made of a coarsely mixed clay that was thoroughly baked to a stone-like hardness.
Fig. 70. Piki stone and primitive andiron in Shumopavi.
Fig. 70. Piki stone and a basic andiron in Shumopavi.
![]() |
Fig. 71.
A terrace fireplace and chimney of Shumopavi. |
Chimneys and fireplaces are often found in Tusayan in the small, recessed, balcony-like rooms of the second terrace. When a deep cooking-pit is required in such a position, it is obtained by building up the sides, as in the indoor fireplaces of upper rooms. Such a fireplace is illustrated in Fig. 71. A roofed recess which usually occurs at one end of the first terrace, called “tupubi,” takes its name from the flat piki oven, the variety of fireplace generally built in these alcoves. The transfer of the fireplace from the second-story room to the corner of such a roofed-terrace alcove was easily accomplished, and probably led to the occasional use of the cooking-pit, with protecting chimney hood on the open and unsheltered roof. Fig. 72 illustrates a deep cooking-pit on an upper 177 terrace of Walpi. In this instance the cooking pit is very massively built, and in the absence of a sheltering “tupubi” corner is effectually protected on three sides by mud-plastered stone work, the whole being capped with the usual chimneypot. The contrivance is placed conveniently near the roof hatchway of a dwelling room.
Chimneys and fireplaces are commonly found in Tusayan in the small, recessed, balcony-like rooms of the second terrace. When a deep cooking pit is needed in such a spot, it’s created by building up the sides, similar to the indoor fireplaces in the upper rooms. An example of this type of fireplace is shown in Fig. 71. A roofed recess that usually appears at one end of the first terrace, called “tupubi,” gets its name from the flat piki oven, which is the type of fireplace typically built in these alcoves. Moving the fireplace from the second-story room to the corner of this roofed-terrace alcove was a straightforward task, and it likely led to the occasional use of the cooking pit with a protective chimney hood on the open, unsheltered roof. Fig. 72 shows a deep cooking pit on an upper 177 terrace of Walpi. In this case, the cooking pit is built quite robustly, and since there’s no sheltering “tupubi” corner, it’s effectively protected on three sides by mud-plastered stonework, all topped with the usual chimneypot. This setup is conveniently located near the roof hatchway of a living room.
Fig. 72. A terrace cooking-pit and chimney of Walpi.
Fig. 72. A terrace cooking pit and chimney of Walpi.
The outdoor use of the above-described fireplaces on upper terraces has apparently suggested the improvement of the ground cooking pit 178 in a similar manner. Several specimens were seen in which the cooking pit of the ordinary depressed type, excavated near an inner corner of a house wall, was provided with sheltering masonry and a chimney cap; but such an arrangement is by no means of frequent occurrence. Fig. 73 illustrates an example that was seen on the east side of Shumopavi. It will be noticed that in the use of this arrangement on the ground—an arrangement that evidently originated on the terraces—the builders have reverted to the earlier form of excavated pit. In other respects the example illustrated is not distinguishable from the terrace forms above described.
The outdoor use of the fireplaces mentioned earlier on upper terraces seems to have inspired the improvement of the ground cooking pit in a similar way. Several examples were observed where the cooking pit, the typical sunken type dug near an inner corner of a house wall, was equipped with protective masonry and a chimney cap; however, this setup is not very common. Fig. 73 shows an example that was found on the east side of Shumopavi. It can be seen that in utilizing this setup on the ground—a setup that clearly originated on the terraces—the builders have gone back to the earlier style of excavated pit. Otherwise, the example shown is similar to the terrace forms described above.
![]() |
Fig. 73.
A ground cooking-pit of Shumopavi covered with a chimney. |
In the discussion of the details of kiva arrangement in Tusayan (p. 121) it was shown that the chimney is not used in any form in these ceremonial chambers; but the simple roof-opening forming the hatchway serves as a smoke vent, without the addition of either an internal hood or an external shaft. In the Zuñi kivas the smoke also finds vent through the opening that gives access to the chamber, but in the framing of the roof, as is shown elsewhere, some distinction between door and chimney is observed. The roof-hole is made double, one portion accommodating the ingress ladder and the other intended to serve for the egress of the smoke.
In the discussion about how kivas are set up in Tusayan (p. 121), it was noted that chimneys aren’t used at all in these ceremonial rooms; instead, the simple roof opening, or hatchway, acts as a smoke vent without needing an internal hood or external shaft. In the Zuñi kivas, smoke also exits through the opening that allows access to the chamber, but as mentioned elsewhere, there’s some distinction between the door and the chimney in the roof design. The roof opening is made in two parts: one part is for the ladder to enter and the other part is meant for the smoke to escape.
The external chimney of the pueblos is a simple structure, and exhibits but few variations from the type. The original form was undoubtedly a mere hole in the roof; its use is perpetuated in the kivas. This primitive form was gradually improved by raising its sides above the roof, forming a rudimentary shaft. The earlier forms are likely to have been rectangular, the round following and developing later short masonry shafts which were finally given height by the addition of chimney pots. In Zuñi the chimney has occasionally developed into a rather tall shaft, projecting sometimes to a height of 4 or 5 feet above the roof. This is particularly noticeable on the lower terraces of Zuñi, the chimneys of 179 the higher rooms being more frequently of the short types prevalent in the farming pueblos of Cibola and in Tusayan. The tall chimneys found in Zuñi proper, and consisting often of four or five chimney pots on a substructure of masonry, are undoubtedly due to the same conditions that have so much influenced other constructional details; that is, the exceptional height of the clusters and crowding of the rooms. As a result of this the chimney is a more conspicuous feature in Zuñi than elsewhere, as will be shown by a comparison of the views of the villages given in Chapters III and IV.
The external chimney of the pueblos is a straightforward structure and shows only a few variations from the typical design. The original form was probably just a hole in the roof, and this use continues in the kivas. This basic design was gradually improved by raising its sides above the roof, creating a simple shaft. The earlier versions were likely rectangular, with round shapes developing later, leading to short masonry shafts that were eventually made taller by adding chimney pots. In Zuñi, the chimney sometimes evolves into a rather tall shaft, extending 4 to 5 feet above the roof. This is especially noticeable on the lower terraces of Zuñi, where the chimneys for the higher rooms tend to be shorter, similar to those found in the farming pueblos of Cibola and Tusayan. The tall chimneys seen in Zuñi, often consisting of four or five chimney pots on a masonry base, are undoubtedly influenced by the unique height and crowded arrangement of the rooms. Because of this, the chimney stands out more prominently in Zuñi than in other places, as will be demonstrated by comparing the village views presented in Chapters III and IV.
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 74. Tusayan chimneys. |
In Tusayan many of the chimneys are quite low, a single pot surmounting a masonry substructure not more than 6 inches high being quite common. As a rule, however, the builders preferred to use a series of pots. Two typical Tusayan chimneys are illustrated in Fig. 74. Most of the substructures for chimneys in this province are rudely rectangular in form, and clearly expose the rough stonework of the masonry, while in Zuñi the use of adobe generally obliterates all traces of construction. In both provinces chimneys are seen without the chimney pot. These usually occur in clusters, simply because the builder of a room or group of rooms preferred that form of chimney. Pl. CI illustrates a portion of the upper terraces of Zuñi where a number of masonry chimneys are grouped together. Those on the highest roof are principally of the rectangular form, being probably a direct development from the square roof hole. The latter is still sometimes seen with a rim rising several inches above the roof surface and formed of slabs set on edge or of ordinary masonry. These upper chimneys are often closed or covered with thin slabs of sandstone laid over them in the same manner as the roof holes that they resemble. The fireplaces to which some of them belong appear to be used for heating the rooms rather than for cooking, as they are often disused for long periods during the summer season.
In Tusayan, many of the chimneys are fairly short, with a single pot sitting on a masonry base that is no more than 6 inches high being quite common. Generally, though, builders preferred to use multiple pots. Two typical Tusayan chimneys are shown in Fig. 74. Most of the chimney bases in this area are roughly rectangular and clearly show the rough stonework of the masonry, while in Zuñi, the use of adobe usually hides any signs of construction. In both regions, chimneys can be seen without chimney pots. These are often found in groups because the builder of a room or set of rooms opted for that type of chimney. Pl. CI shows part of the upper terraces of Zuñi where several masonry chimneys are clustered together. The ones on the highest roof are mainly rectangular, likely a direct evolution from the square roof hole. Sometimes, this square hole is still seen with a rim rising several inches above the roof surface, made of slabs set on edge or regular masonry. These upper chimneys are often closed or covered with thin slabs of sandstone placed over them, similar to the roof holes they resemble. The fireplaces they connect to seem to be used more for heating the rooms rather than cooking, as they often sit unused for long periods during the summer.
Plate CI. Masonry chimneys of Zuñi.
Plate CI. Masonry chimneys of Zuñi.
180 Pl. CI also illustrates chimneys in which pots have been used in connection with masonry bases, and also a round masonry chimney. The latter is immediately behind the single pot chimney seen in the foreground. On the extreme left of the figure is shown a chimney into which fire pots have been incorporated, the lower ones being almost concealed from view by the coating of adobe. A similar effect may be seen in the small chimney on the highest roof shown in Pl. LVIII. Pl. LXXXII shows various methods of using the chimney pots. In one case the chimney is capped with a reversed large-mouthed jar, the broken bottom serving as an outlet for the smoke. The vessel usually employed for this purpose is an ordinary black cooking pot, the bottom being burned out, or otherwise rendered unfit for household use. Other vessels are occasionally used. Pl. LXXXIII shows the use, as the crowning member of the chimney, of an ordinary water jar, with dark decorations on a white ground. A vessel very badly broken is often made to serve in chimney building by skillful use of mud and mortar. To facilitate smoke exit the upper pot is made to overlap the neck of the one below by breaking out the bottom sufficiently. The joining is not often visible, as it is usually coated with adobe. The lower pots of a series are in many cases entirely embedded in the adobe.
180 Pl. CI also shows chimneys where pots are used with masonry bases, as well as a round masonry chimney located right behind the single pot chimney in the foreground. On the far left of the figure, there’s a chimney that incorporates fire pots, with the lower ones nearly hidden from view by the adobe coating. A similar look can be seen in the small chimney on the highest roof in Pl. LVIII. Pl. L82 displays different ways to use chimney pots. In one instance, the chimney is topped with an upside-down large jar, where the broken bottom acts as a smoke outlet. The vessel commonly used for this is a regular black cooking pot, which has had its bottom burned out or otherwise damaged beyond household use. Occasionally, other types of vessels are used. Pl. L83 illustrates the use of a typical water jar, decorated with dark designs on a white background, as the top part of the chimney. Even a badly broken vessel can be creatively used in chimney construction with the skillful application of mud and mortar. To help smoke escape, the upper pot is designed to slightly overlap the neck of the pot below by breaking out the bottom enough. This connection is usually hidden since it’s typically covered with adobe. In many cases, the lower pots in a series are completely buried within the adobe.
The pueblo builder has never been able to construct a detached chimney a full story in height, either with or without the aid of chimney pots; where it is necessary to build such shafts to obtain the proper draft he is compelled to rely on the support of adjoining walls, and usually seeks a corner. Pl. CI shows a chimney of this kind that has been built of masonry to the full height of a story. A similar example is shown in the foreground of Pl. LXXVIII. In Pl. XXII may be seen a chimney of the full height of the adjoining story, but in this instance it is constructed wholly of pots. Pl. LXXXV illustrates a similar case indoors.
The pueblo builder has never been able to create a standalone chimney that’s a full story tall, whether using chimney pots or not; when it’s necessary to build such structures for proper ventilation, they have to rely on the support of nearby walls and usually choose a corner. Pl. CI shows a chimney of this type that has been made from masonry up to the full height of a story. A similar example is visible in the foreground of Pl. LXXVIII. In Pl. XXII, you can see a chimney that matches the full height of the adjacent story, but in this case, it’s made entirely of pots. Pl. LXXXV illustrates a similar situation indoors.
The external chimney probably developed gradually from the simple roof opening, as previously noted. The raised combing about trapdoors or roof holes afforded the first suggestion in this direction. From this developed the square chimney, and finally the tall round shaft, crowned with a series of pots. The whole chimney, both internal and external, excluding only the primitive fireplace, is probably of comparatively recent origin, and based on the foreign (Spanish) suggestion.
The external chimney likely evolved gradually from the simple roof opening, as mentioned before. The raised edges around trapdoors or roof openings provided the first hint in this direction. This led to the development of the square chimney, and eventually the tall round shaft, topped with a series of pots. The entire chimney, both internal and external, not including the basic fireplace, is probably of relatively recent origin and influenced by foreign (Spanish) ideas.
GATEWAYS AND COVERED PASSAGES.
Gateways, arranged for defense, occur in many of the more compactly-built ancient pueblos. Some of the passageways in the modern villages of Tusayan and Cibola resemble these older examples, but most of the narrow passages, giving access to the inner courts of the inhabited villages, are not the result of the defensive idea, but are formed by the crowding together of the dwellings. They occur, as a rule, within the pueblo and not upon its periphery. Many of the terraces now face outward and are reached from the outside of the pueblo, being in marked contrast to the early arrangement, in which narrow passages to inclose 181 courts were exclusively used for access. In the ground plans of several villages occupied within historic times, but now ruined, vestiges of openings arranged on the original defensive plan may be traced. About midway on the northeast side of Awatubi fragments of a standing wall were seen, apparently the two sides of a passageway to the inclosed court of the pueblo. The masonry is much broken down, however, and no indication is afforded of the treatment adopted, nor do the remains indicate whether this entrance was originally covered or not. It is illustrated in Pl. CII.
Gateways, set up for defense, can be found in many of the more densely built ancient pueblos. Some of the passageways in the modern villages of Tusayan and Cibola look similar to these older examples, but most of the narrow passages that lead to the inner courts of the inhabited villages are not created for defense; they result from the close arrangement of the homes. Generally, these passages are located within the pueblo rather than on its outskirts. Many of the terraces now face outward and can be accessed from outside the pueblo, which is a stark contrast to the earlier setup, where narrow passages to enclosed courts were solely used for access. In the ground plans of several villages occupied in historic times but now in ruins, traces of openings designed according to the original defensive layout can still be seen. About halfway along the northeast side of Awatubi, fragments of a standing wall were found, seemingly representing the two sides of a passageway to the enclosed court of the pueblo. However, the masonry is quite deteriorated, and there are no signs of how it was originally treated, nor do the remains suggest whether this entrance was initially covered or not. It is illustrated in Pl. CII.
Plate CII. Remains of a gateway in Awatubi.
Plate CII. Remains of a gate in Awatubi.
In the first of these the deep jambs of the opening are clearly defined, but in the other two only low mounds of débris suggest the gateway. In the ancient Cibolan pueblos, including those on the mesa of Tâaaiyalana, no remains of external gateways have been found; the plans suggest that the disposition of the various clusters approximated somewhat the irregular arrangement of the present day. There are only occasional traces, as of a continuous defensive outer wall, such as those seen at Nutria and Pescado. In the pueblos of the Cibola group, ancient and modern, access to the inner portion of the pueblo was usually afforded at a number of points. In the pueblo of Kin-tiel, however, occurs an excellent example of the defensive gateway. The jambs and corners of the opening are finished with great neatness, as may be seen in the illustration (Pl. CIII). This gateway or passage was roofed over, and the rectangular depressions for the reception of cross-beams still contain short stumps, protected from destruction by the masonry. The masonry over the passageway in falling carried away part of the masonry above the jamb corner, thus indicating continuity of bond. The ground plan of this ruin (Pl. LXIII) indicates clearly the various points at which access to the inner courts was obtained. On the east side a noticeable feature is the overlapping of the boundary wall of the south wing, forming an indirect entranceway. The remains do not indicate that this passage, like the one just described, was roofed over. In some cases the modern passageways, as they follow the jogs and angles of adjoining rows of houses, display similar changes of direction. In Shupaulovi, which preserves most distinctly in its plan the idea of the inclosed court, the passageway at the south end of the village changes its direction at a right angle before emerging into the court (Pl. XXX). This arrangement was undoubtedly determined by the position of the terraces long before the passageway was roofed over and built upon. Pl. XXII shows the south passageway of Walpi; the entrances are made narrower than the rest of the passage by building buttresses of masonry at the sides. This was probably done to secure the necessary support for the north and south walls of the upper story. One of the walls, as maybe seen in the illustration, rests directly upon a cross beam, strengthened in this manner.
In the first of these, the deep edges of the opening are clearly visible, but in the other two, only low piles of debris hint at the entrance. In the ancient Cibolan pueblos, including those on the mesa of Tâaaiyalana, no signs of external gateways have been found; the layout suggests that the arrangement of the various clusters resembles somewhat the irregular setup we see today. There are just occasional remnants of a continuous defensive outer wall, like those seen at Nutria and Pescado. In the pueblos of the Cibola group, both ancient and modern, access to the inner part of the pueblo was usually available at several points. However, in the pueblo of Kin-tiel, there is a great example of a defensive gateway. The edges and corners of the opening are finished with great precision, as shown in the illustration (Pl. CIII). This gateway or passage was covered, and the rectangular notches for the cross-beams still contain short stumps, protected from damage by the masonry. The masonry above the passageway fell and took part of the masonry above the corner with it, indicating a continuous bond. The layout of this ruin (Pl. LXIII) clearly shows the various points of access to the inner courts. On the east side, a notable feature is the overlapping of the boundary wall of the south wing, creating an indirect entrance. The remains don’t suggest that this passage, like the one just mentioned, was covered. In some cases, the modern pathways, as they follow the twists and angles of adjacent rows of houses, show similar directional changes. In Shupaulovi, which best maintains the concept of the enclosed court in its layout, the passageway at the south end of the village turns at a right angle before leading into the court (Pl. XXX). This arrangement was undoubtedly influenced by the location of the terraces long before the passageway was covered and constructed upon. Pl. XXII shows the south passageway of Walpi; the entrances are made narrower than the rest of the passage by adding masonry buttresses on the sides. This was likely done to provide the necessary support for the north and south walls of the upper story. One of the walls, as shown in the illustration, rests directly on a cross beam, strengthened in this way.
Plate CIII. Ancient gateway, Kin-tiel.
Plate CIII. Ancient gate, Kin-tiel.
182 One of the smaller inclosed courts of Zuñi, illustrated in Pl. LXXXII, is reached by means of two covered passages, bearing some general resemblance to the ancient defensive entrances, but these houses, reached from within the court, have also terraces without. The low passage shown in the figure has gradually been surmounted by rooms, reaching in some cases a height of three terraces above the openings; but the accumulated weight finally proved too much for the beams and sustaining walls—probably never intended by the builders to withstand the severe test afterwards put upon them—and following an unusually protracted period of wet weather, the entire section of rooms above fell to the ground. This occurred since the surveying and photographing. It is rather remarkable that the frail adobe walls withstood so long the unusual strain, or even that they sustained the addition of a top story at all.
182 One of the smaller enclosed courts of Zuñi, shown in Pl. LXXXII, is accessed through two covered passages that somewhat resemble the ancient defensive entrances. However, the houses that are accessed from within the court also have terraces on the outside. The low passage depicted in the image has gradually been topped by rooms, sometimes reaching three terraces high above the openings. But the added weight eventually became too much for the beams and support walls—likely never meant by the builders to carry such a heavy load—and after an unusually long period of wet weather, the entire section of rooms above collapsed. This happened after the surveying and photographing. It's quite remarkable that the fragile adobe walls lasted so long under such unusual stress, or that they even managed to support an extra story at all.
In the preceding examples the passageway was covered throughout its length by rooms, but cases occur in both Tusayan and Cibola in which only portions of the roof form the floor of superstructures. Pl. CIV shows a passage roofed over beyond the two-story portion of the building for a sufficient distance to form a small terrace, upon which a ladder stands. Pl. XXIII illustrates a similar arrangement on the west side of Walpi. The outer edges of these terraces are covered with coping stones and treated in the same manner as outer walls of lower rooms. In Zuñi an example of this form of passage roof occurs between two of the eastern house rows, where the rooms have not been subjected to the close crowding characteristic of the western clusters of the pueblo.
In the previous examples, the passageway was completely covered by rooms, but there are instances in both Tusayan and Cibola where only parts of the roof serve as the floor for superstructures. Pl. CIV shows a passage that is roofed over beyond the two-story part of the building, creating a small terrace where a ladder is placed. Pl. XXIII illustrates a similar setup on the west side of Walpi. The outer edges of these terraces are lined with coping stones and treated just like the outer walls of the lower rooms. In Zuñi, an example of this type of passage roof can be found between two of the eastern house rows, where the rooms are not as tightly packed as those in the western clusters of the pueblo.
Plate CIV. A covered passageway in Mashongnavi.
Plate CIV. A covered walkway in Mashongnavi.
DOORS.
In Zuñi many rooms of the ground story, which in early times must have been used largely for storage, have been converted into well-lighted, habitable apartments by the addition of external doors. In Tusayan this modification has not taken place to an equal extent, the distinctly defensive character of the first terrace reached by removable ladders being still preserved. In this province a doorway on the ground is always provided in building a house, but originally this space was not designed to be permanent; it was left merely for convenience of passing in and out during the construction, and was built up before the walls were completed. Of late years, however, such doorways are often preserved, and additional small openings are constructed for windows.
In Zuñi, many rooms on the ground floor, which were mostly used for storage in the past, have been transformed into bright, livable spaces by adding external doors. In Tusayan, this change hasn't happened as much, as the distinctly defensive nature of the first terrace, accessed by removable ladders, is still maintained. In this area, a ground-level doorway is always included when building a house, but initially, this opening wasn’t meant to be permanent; it was left for convenience during construction and was sealed up before the walls were completed. Recently, however, these doorways are often kept, and extra small openings are added for windows.
In ancient times the larger doorways of the upper terraces were probably never closed, except by means of blankets or rabbit-skin robes hung over them in cold weather. Examples have been seen that seem to have been constructed with this object in view, for a slight pole, of the same kind as those used in the lintels, is built into the masonry of the jambs a few inches below the lintel proper. Openings imperfectly closed against the cold and wind were naturally placed in the lee walls to avoid the prevailing southwest winds, and the ground plans of the exposed mesa villages were undoubtedly influenced by this circumstance, 183 the tendency being to change them from the early inclosed court type and to place the houses in longitudinal rows facing eastward. This is noticeable in the plans given in Chapter II.
In ancient times, the larger doorways of the upper terraces were probably never completely closed, except by using blankets or rabbit-fur robes hung over them during cold weather. There are examples that appear to have been designed for this purpose, as a small pole, similar to those used in the lintels, is built into the masonry of the jambs a few inches below the actual lintel. Openings that were not fully sealed against the cold and wind were naturally placed in the sheltered walls to avoid the dominant southwest winds, and the layout of the exposed mesa villages was likely influenced by this situation, 183 resulting in a shift from the earlier enclosed court style to houses arranged in long rows facing east. This is evident in the plans shown in Chapter II.
Doorways closed with masonry are seen in many ruins. Possibly these are an indication of the temporary absence of the owner, as in the harvest season, or at the time of the destruction or abandonment of the village; but they may have been closed for the purpose of economizing warmth and fuel during the winter season. No provision was made for closing them with movable doors. The practice of fastening up the doors during the harvesting season prevails at the present time among the Zuñi, but the result is attained without great difficulty by means of rude cross bars, now that they have framed wooden doors. One of these is illustrated in Fig. 75. These doors are usually opened by a latch-string, which, when not hung outside, is reached by means of a small round hole through the wall at the side of the door. Through this hole the owner of the house, on leaving it, secures the door by props and braces on the inside of the room, the hole being sealed up and plastered in the same manner that other openings are treated.
Doorways sealed with stone can be found in many ruins. This might indicate that the owner was temporarily away, perhaps during the harvest season or when the village was destroyed or abandoned; however, they could also have been sealed to save heat and fuel during the winter. There was no plan to close them off with movable doors. Today, the Zuñi still practice closing their doors during harvest time, but they do this easily with simple crossbars now that they have wooden framed doors. One of these is illustrated in Fig. 75. These doors are typically opened with a latch-string, which, when not hanging outside, can be accessed through a small round hole in the wall next to the door. Through this hole, the homeowner can secure the door with props and braces from inside the room, and the hole is then covered and plastered the same way other openings are treated.
Fig. 75. A barred Zuñi door.
A barred Zuni door.
This curious arrangement affords another illustration of the survival of ancient methods in modified forms. It is not employed, however, in closing the doors of the first terrace; these are fastened by barring from the inside, the exit being made by means of internal ladders to the terrace above, the upper doors only being fastened in the manner illustrated. In Pl. LXXIX may be seen good examples of the side hole. Fig. 75 shows a barred door. The plastering or sealing of the small side 184 hole instead of the entire opening was brought about by the introduction of the wooden door, which in its present paneled form is of foreign introduction, but in this, as in so many other cases, some analogous feature which facilitated the adoption of the idea probably already existed. Tradition points to the early use of a small door, made of a single slab of wood, that closed the small rectangular wall niches, in which valuables, such as turquoise, shell, etc., were kept. This slab, it is said, was reduced and smoothed by rubbing with a piece of sandstone. A number of beams, rafters, and roofing planks, seen in the Chaco pueblos, were probably squared and finished in this way. The latter examples show a degree of familiarity with this treatment of wood that would enable the builders to construct such doors with ease. As yet, however, no examples of wooden doors have been seen in any of the pre-Columbian ruins.
This interesting setup gives us another example of how ancient methods have survived in modified ways. However, it’s not used to close the doors of the first terrace; these are secured by barring them from the inside, with access to the terrace above via internal ladders. Only the upper doors are secured as shown. In Pl. LXXIX, you can see good examples of the side hole. Fig. 75 displays a barred door. The plastering or sealing of the small side hole instead of the whole opening happened with the introduction of the wooden door, which in its current paneled form is of foreign origin. Yet, in many other cases, some similar features that helped in adopting this idea likely already existed. Tradition suggests that a small door made from a single slab of wood was used to close the small rectangular wall niches that held valuables like turquoise and shell. It’s said this slab was smoothed out by rubbing it with a piece of sandstone. Many beams, rafters, and roofing planks found in the Chaco pueblos were likely squared and finished in a similar way. These examples indicate that the builders had a good understanding of this wood treatment, making it easier for them to construct such doors. However, no wooden door examples have been found in any pre-Columbian ruins yet.
The pueblo type of paneled door is much more frequently seen in Cibola than in Tusayan, and in the latter province it does not assume the variety of treatment seen in Zuñi, nor is the work so neatly executed. The views of the modern pueblos, given in Chapters III and IV, will indicate the extent to which this feature occurs in the two groups. In the construction of a paneled door the vertical stile on one side is prolonged at the top and bottom into a rounded pivot, which works into cup-like sockets in the lintel and sill, as illustrated in Fig. 76. The hinge is thus produced in the wood itself without the aid of any external appliances.
The pueblo-style paneled door is seen much more often in Cibola than in Tusayan, and in the latter region, it doesn’t have the same variety of designs found in Zuñi, nor is the craftsmanship as precise. The images of the modern pueblos shown in Chapters III and IV will illustrate how common this feature is in the two areas. When making a paneled door, the vertical stile on one side extends at the top and bottom into a rounded pivot, which fits into cup-like sockets in the lintel and sill, as shown in Fig. 76. The hinge is therefore created in the wood itself without needing any external devices.
![]() |
Fig. 76.
Wooden pivot hinges of a Zuñi door. |
It is difficult to trace the origin of this device among the pueblos. It closely resembles the pivot hinges sometimes used in mediæval Europe in connection with massive gates for closing masonry passages; in such cases the prolonged pivots worked in cavities of stone sills and lintels. The Indians claim to have employed it in very early times, but no evidence on this point has been found. It is quite possible that the idea was borrowed from some of the earlier Mormon settlers who came into the country, as these people use a number of primitive devices which are undoubtedly survivals of methods of construction once common in the countries from which they came. Vestiges of the use of a pivotal hinge, constructed on a much more massive scale than any of the pueblo examples, were seen at an old fortress-like, stone storehouse of the Mormons, built near the site of Moen-kopi by the first Mormon settlers.
It’s hard to figure out where this device originated among the pueblos. It looks a lot like the pivot hinges that were sometimes used in medieval Europe for closing heavy gates in stone passageways; in those instances, the long pivots fit into grooves in stone sills and lintels. The Native Americans say they used it a long time ago, but there’s no evidence to back that up. It's possible that the idea was borrowed from some of the earlier Mormon settlers who arrived in the area, as these individuals have a number of basic devices that are definitely remnants of building methods that used to be common in their countries of origin. Traces of a pivot hinge, built on a much larger scale than any examples from the pueblos, were found at an old fortress-like stone storehouse built by the Mormons, near the site of Moen-kopi, by the first Mormon settlers.
The paneled door now in use among the pueblos is rudely made, and consists of a frame inclosing a single panel. This panel, when of large size, is occasionally made of two or more pieces. These doors vary greatly in size. A few reach the height of 5 feet, but the usual height 185 is from 3½ to 4 feet. As doors are commonly elevated a foot or more above the ground or floor, the use of such openings does not entail the full degree of discomfort that the small size suggests. Doors of larger size, with sills raised but an inch or two above the floor or ground, have recently been introduced in some of the ground stories in Zuñi; but these are very recent, and the idea has been adopted only by the most progressive people.
The panelized door currently used in the pueblos is roughly made and consists of a frame surrounding a single panel. When the panel is large, it can be made from two or more pieces. These doors come in various sizes. A few are as tall as 5 feet, but the typical height is between 3½ to 4 feet. Since doors are usually raised a foot or more off the ground or floor, using such openings isn't as uncomfortable as their small size might suggest. Larger doors, with sills just an inch or two above the floor or ground, have recently been introduced in some ground-level areas in Zuñi. However, these are quite new, and the idea has only been embraced by the most forward-thinking individuals.
Pl. XLI shows a small paneled door, not more than a foot square, used as a blind to close a back window of a dwelling. The smallest examples of paneled doors are those employed for closing the small, square openings 186 in the back walls of house rows, which still retain the defensive arrangement so marked in many of the ancient pueblos. In some instances doors occur in the second stories of unterraced walls, their sills being 5 or 6 feet above the ground. In such cases the doors are reached by ladders whose upper ends rest upon the sills. Elevated openings of this kind are closed in the usual manner with a rude, single-paneled door, which is often whitened with a coating of clayey gypsum.
Pl. XLI shows a small panel door, no bigger than a foot square, used as a cover for a back window of a home. The tiniest examples of panel doors are used to close the small, square openings 186 in the back walls of row houses, which still have the defensive layout that is so typical in many ancient pueblos. Sometimes, doors are found on the second stories of flat walls, with their sills set 5 or 6 feet above the ground. In these cases, the doors are accessible by ladders that rest on the sills. These elevated openings are closed in the usual way with a simple, single-panel door, which is often coated with a layer of clayey gypsum for a white appearance.
Carefully worked paneled doors are much more common in Zuñi than in Tusayan, and within the latter province the villages of the first mesa make more extended use of this type of door, as they have come into more intimate contact with their eastern brethren than other villages of the group. Fig. 77 illustrates a portion of a Hano house in which two wooden doors occur. These specimens indicate the rudeness of Tusayan workmanship. It will be seen that the workman who framed the upper one of these doors met with considerable difficulty in properly joining the two boards of the panel and in connecting these with the frame. The figure shows that at several points the door has been reenforced and strengthened by buckskin and rawhide thongs. The same device has been employed in the lower door, both in fastening together the two pieces of the panel and in attaching the latter to the framing. These doors also illustrate the customary manner of barring the door during the absence of the occupant of the house.
Carefully crafted paneled doors are much more common in Zuñi than in Tusayan, and within the latter area, the villages on the first mesa make more extensive use of this type of door since they've been in closer contact with their eastern neighbors than other villages in the group. Fig. 77 shows a part of a Hano house where two wooden doors are found. These examples highlight the roughness of Tusayan craftsmanship. You can see that the worker who made the upper door faced quite a challenge in properly joining the two boards of the panel and connecting them to the frame. The image shows that at several points the door has been reinforced and strengthened with buckskin and rawhide thongs. The same method has been used in the lower door, both to hold the two pieces of the panel together and to attach the panel to the frame. These doors also demonstrate the typical way to secure the door when the person living in the house is away.
Fig. 77. Paneled wooden doors in Hano.
Wood-paneled doors in Hanoi.
The doorway is usually framed at the time the house is built. The sill is generally elevated above the ground outside and the floor inside, and the door openings, with a few exceptions, are thus practically only large windows. In this respect they follow the arrangement characteristic of the ancient pueblos, in which all the larger openings are window-like doorways. These are sometimes seen on the court margin of house rows, and frequently occur between communicating rooms within the cluster. They are usually raised about a foot and a half above the floor, and in some cases are provided with one or two steps. In Zuñi, doorways between communicating rooms, though now framed in wood, preserve the same arrangement, as may be seen in Pl. LXXXVI.
The doorway is typically framed when the house is built. The sill is usually raised above the ground outside and the floor inside, making the door openings, with a few exceptions, practically just large windows. In this way, they follow the design typical of ancient pueblos, where all the larger openings are window-like doorways. You can often find these on the edges of house rows and frequently between connected rooms within a cluster. They are usually about a foot and a half above the floor, and in some cases, they have one or two steps. In Zuñi, doorways between connected rooms, though now framed in wood, maintain this same design, as can be seen in Pl. LXXXVI.
The side pieces of a paneled pueblo door are mortised, an achievement far beyond the aboriginal art of these people. Fig. 78 illustrates the manner in which the framing is done. All the necessary grooving, and the preparation of the projecting tenons is laboriously executed with the most primitive tools, in many cases the whole frame, with all its joints, being cut out with a small knife.
The side pieces of a paneled pueblo door are fitted together, showcasing a skill that goes well beyond the original craftsmanship of these people. Fig. 78 shows how the framing is done. All the necessary grooves and the preparation of the projecting tenons are done painstakingly with basic tools, often using just a small knife to cut out the entire frame and all its joints.
Fig. 78. Framing of a
Zuñi door-panel.
Fig. 78. Framing of a
Zuni door panel.
Doors are usually fastened by a simple wooden latch, the bar of which turns upon a wooden pin. They are opened from without by lifting the 187 latch from its wooden catch, by means of a string passed through a small hole in the door, and hanging outside. Some few doors are, however, provided with a cumbersome wooden lock, operated by means of a square, notched stick that serves as a key. These locks are usually fastened to the inner side of the door by thongs of buckskin or rawhide, passed through small holes bored or drilled through the edge of the lock, and through the stile and panel of the door at corresponding points. The entire mechanism consists of wood and strings joined together in the rudest manner. Primitive as this device is, however, its conception is far in advance of the aboriginal culture of the pueblos, and both it and the string latch must have come from without. The lock was probably a contrivance of the early Mormons, as it is evidently roughly modeled after a metallic lock.
Doors are typically secured with a basic wooden latch that pivots on a wooden pin. They can be opened from the outside by lifting the latch from its wooden catch using a string threaded through a small hole in the door, which hangs outside. However, a few doors are equipped with a bulky wooden lock that is operated by a square, notched stick acting as a key. These locks are usually attached to the inside of the door with buckskin or rawhide thongs, threaded through small holes drilled through the edge of the lock and matched with holes in the door's edge and panel. The whole setup is made of wood and strings tied together in a very basic way. Despite its simplicity, this mechanism is surprisingly advanced compared to the original culture of the pueblos, suggesting that both it and the string latch must have originated from elsewhere. The lock was likely invented by the early Mormons, as it clearly resembles a crude version of a metal lock.
Many doors having no permanent means of closure are still in use. These are very common in Tusayan, and occur also in Cibola, particularly in the farming pueblos. The open front of the “tupubi” or balcony-like recess, seen so frequently at the ends of first-terrace roofs in Tusayan, is often constructed with a transom-like arrangement in connection with the girder supporting the edge of the roof, in the same manner in which doorways proper are treated. Pl. XXXII illustrates a balcony in which one bounding side is formed by a flight of stone steps, producing a notched or terraced effect. The supporting girder in this instance is embedded in the wall and coated over with adobe, obscuring the construction. Fig. 79 shows a rude transom over the supporting beam of a balcony roof in the principal house of Hano. The upper doorway shown in this house has been partly walled in, reducing its size somewhat. It is also provided with a small horizontal opening over the main lintel, which, like the doorway, has been partly filled with masonry. This upper transom often seems to have resulted from carrying such openings to the full height of the story. The transom probably originated from the spaces left between the ends of beams resting on the main girder that spanned the principal opening (see Fig. 81). Somewhat similar balconies are seen in Cibola, both in Zuñi and in the farming villages, but they do not assume so much importance as in Tusayan. An example is shown in Pl. CI, in which the construction of this feature is clearly visible.
Many doors that don't have a permanent way to close them are still in use. These are very common in Tusayan and also found in Cibola, especially in the farming pueblos. The open front of the “tupubi” or balcony-like recess, which is often seen at the ends of first-terrace roofs in Tusayan, is frequently built with a transom-like setup connected to the girder supporting the roof's edge, similar to how proper doorways are made. Pl. XXXII shows a balcony where one side is bordered by a set of stone steps, creating a notched or terraced look. In this case, the supporting girder is embedded in the wall and covered with adobe, hiding the construction. Fig. 79 displays a rough transom over the supporting beam of a balcony roof in the main house of Hano. The upper doorway in this house has been partly walled in, making it smaller. There's also a small horizontal opening above the main lintel, which, like the doorway, has been partially filled with masonry. This upper transom often seems to have come from extending such openings to the full height of the story. The transom likely originated from the spaces left between the ends of beams resting on the main girder that spanned the main opening (see Fig. 81). Similar balconies can be seen in Cibola, both in Zuñi and in the farming villages, but they aren’t as significant as those in Tusayan. An example is shown in Pl. CI, where the construction of this feature is clearly visible.
Fig. 79. Rude transoms over Tusayan openings.
Fig. 79. Simple transoms over Tusayan openings.
In the remains of the ancient pueblos there is no evidence of the use of the half-open terrace rooms described above. If such rooms existed, especially if constructed in the open manner of the Tusayan examples, they must have been among the first to succumb to destruction. The comparative rarity of this feature in Zuñi does not necessarily indicate that it is not of native origin, as owing to the exceptional manner of clustering and to prolonged exposure to foreign influence, this pueblo exhibits a wider departure from the ancient type than do any of the Tusayan villages. It is likely that the ancient builders, trusting to the double protection of the inclosed court and the defensive first terrace, 188 freely adopted this open and convenient arrangement in connection with the upper roofs.
In the remains of the ancient pueblos, there's no sign of the half-open terrace rooms mentioned earlier. If those rooms existed, especially if they were built like the ones in Tusayan, they likely were among the first to be destroyed. The fact that this feature is relatively rare in Zuñi doesn't automatically mean it's not of native origin. Due to the unique way of clustering and long-term exposure to outside influences, this pueblo shows a greater departure from the ancient style compared to the Tusayan villages. It's probable that the ancient builders, relying on the enclosed courtyard and the protective first terrace, comfortably adopted this open and practical layout in conjunction with the upper roofs. 188
Fig. 80.
A large Tusayan doorway
with small transom openings.
Fig. 80.
A large Tusayan doorway
with small transom windows.
The transom-like opening commonly accompanying the large opening is also seen in many of the inclosed doorways of Tusayan, but in some of these cases its origin can not be traced to the roof constructions, as the openings do not approach the ceilings of the rooms. In early days such doorways were closed by means of large slabs of stone set on edge, and these were sometimes supplemented by a suspended blanket. In severe winter weather many of the openings were closed with masonry. At the present time many doorways not provided with paneled doors 189 are closed in such ways. When a doorway is thus treated its transom is left open for the admission of light and air. The Indians state that in early times this transom was provided for the exit of smoke when the main doorway was closed, and even now such provision is not wholly superfluous. Fig. 80 illustrates a large doorway of Tusayan with a small transom. The opening was being reduced in size by means of adobe masonry at the time the drawing was made. Fig. 81 shows a double transom over a lintel composed of two poles; a section of masonry separating the transom into two distinct openings rests upon the lintel of the doorway and supports a roof-beam; this is shown in the figure. Other examples of transoms may be seen in connection with many of the illustrations of Tusayan doorways.
The transom-like opening usually found above large doorways is also seen in many of the enclosed doorways of Tusayan. However, in some cases, its origin can’t be traced back to the roof structures since the openings don’t reach the ceilings of the rooms. In earlier times, these doorways were closed with large stone slabs set on edge, sometimes supplemented by a hanging blanket. During harsh winter weather, many of the openings were closed up with masonry. Nowadays, many doorways without paneled doors 189 are closed in this manner. When a doorway is treated this way, its transom is left open to allow light and air in. The Indians say that in the past, this transom was there to let smoke escape when the main doorway was closed, and that function is still somewhat relevant today. Fig. 80 shows a large Tusayan doorway with a small transom. The opening was being narrowed by adobe masonry when the drawing was made. Fig. 81 illustrates a double transom over a lintel made of two poles; a section of masonry divides the transom into two separate openings, resting on the lintel and supporting a roof beam; this is depicted in the figure. Additional examples of transoms can be seen in many illustrations of Tusayan doorways.
![]() |
Fig. 81.
A doorway and double transom in Walpi. |
The transom bars over exterior doorways of houses probably bear some relation to a feature seen in some of the best preserved ruins and still surviving to some extent in Tusayan practice. This consists of a straight pole, usually of the same dimensions as the poles of which the lintel is made, extending across the opening from 2 to 6 inches below the main lintel, and fixed into the masonry in a position to serve as a curtain pole. Originally this pole undoubtedly served as a means of suspension for the blanket or skin rug used in closing the opening, just as such means are now used in the huts of the Navajo, as well as 190 occasionally in the houses of Tusayan. The space above this cross stick answered the same purpose as the transoms of the present time.
The transom bars over doorways in houses likely relate to a feature found in some of the best-preserved ruins and still seen to some extent in contemporary Tusayan practices. This feature consists of a straight pole, usually the same size as the poles used for the lintel, extending across the opening from 2 to 6 inches below the main lintel and fixed into the masonry to serve as a curtain pole. Originally, this pole likely functioned as a support for the blanket or skin rug that closed the opening, similar to what is used today in Navajo huts and sometimes in Tusayan homes. The space above this cross stick served the same purpose as modern transoms. 190
![]() |
Fig. 82.
An ancient doorway in Canyon de Chelly cliff ruin. |
![]() |
Fig. 83.
A symmetrically notched doorway in Mashongnavi. |
A most striking feature of doorways is the occasional departure from the quadrangular form, seen in some ruined villages and also in some of the modern houses of Tusayan. Fig. 82 illustrates a specimen of this type found in a small cliff ruin, in Canyon de Chelly. Ancient examples of this form of opening are distinguished by a symmetrical disposition of the step in the jamb, while the modern doors are seldom so arranged. A modern example from Mashongnavi is shown in Fig. 83. This opening also illustrates the double or divided transom. The beam ends shown in the figure project beyond the face of the wall and support an overhanging coping or cornice. A door-like window, approximating the symmetrical form described, is seen immediately over the passage-way shown in Pl. XXII. This form is evidently the result of the partial closing of a larger rectangular opening.
A striking feature of doorways is the occasional departure from the rectangular shape, seen in some abandoned villages and in some modern homes in Tusayan. Fig. 82 shows an example of this type found in a small cliff ruin in Canyon de Chelly. Ancient examples of this kind of opening have a symmetrical design in the step of the jamb, while modern doors are rarely arranged that way. A modern example from Mashongnavi is displayed in Fig. 83. This opening also features a double or divided transom. The beam ends shown in the figure extend beyond the wall and support an overhanging coping or cornice. A door-like window, resembling the symmetrical shape described, is seen directly above the passageway shown in Pl. XXII. This form clearly results from the partial closing of a larger rectangular opening.
Fig. 84 shows the usual type of terraced doorway in Tusayan, in which one jamb is stepped at a considerably greater height than the other. In Tusayan large openings occur in which only one jamb is stepped, producing an effect somewhat of that of the large balcony openings with flights of stone steps at one side, previously illustrated. An opening of this form is shown in Fig. 85. Both of the stepped doorways, 191 illustrated above, are provided with transom openings extending from one roof beam to another. In the absence of a movable door the openings were made of the smallest size consistent with convenient use. The stepped form was very likely suggested by the temporary partial blocking up of an opening with loose, flat stones in such a manner as to least impair its use. This is still quite commonly done, large openings being often seen in which the lower portion on one or both sides is narrowed by means of adobe bricks or stones loosely piled up. In this connection it may be noted that the secondary lintel pole, previously described as occurring in both ancient and modern doorways, serves the additional purpose of a hand-hold when supplies are brought into the house on the backs of the occupants. The stepping of the doorway, while diminishing its exposed area, does not interfere with its use in bringing in large bundles, etc. Series of steps, picked into the faces of the cliffs, and affording access to cliff dwellings, frequently have a supplementary series of narrow and deep cavities that furnish a secure hold for the hands. The requirements of the precipitous environment of these people have led to the carrying of loads of produce, fuel, etc., on the back by means of a suspending band passed across the forehead; 192 this left the hands free to aid in the difficult task of climbing. These conditions seem to have brought about the use, in some cases, of handholds in the marginal frames of interior trapdoors as an aid in climbing the ladder.
Fig. 84 shows the typical terraced doorway in Tusayan, where one side is stepped up significantly higher than the other. In Tusayan, there are large openings where only one side is stepped, creating a look similar to large balcony openings with stone steps on one side, as shown earlier. An example of this type can be seen in Fig. 85. Both stepped doorways illustrated above have transom openings that stretch from one roof beam to another. Without a movable door, these openings were made as small as possible while still being convenient to use. The stepped design was likely inspired by temporarily blocking part of an opening with loose, flat stones in a way that minimally affected its use. This practice is still common, with large openings often having the lower part on one or both sides narrowed with loosely stacked adobe bricks or stones. It’s also worth noting that the secondary lintel pole, mentioned earlier as found in both ancient and modern doorways, serves as a handhold when supplies are brought into the home on the occupants’ backs. The stepped design of the doorway reduces its exposed area but does not hinder carrying large bundles. Series of steps carved into cliff faces, which provide access to cliff dwellings, often include a second series of narrow, deep cavities for a secure handhold. The steep environment has led people to carry loads of food, fuel, etc., on their backs using a band across their forehead; this keeps their hands free to help with the challenging task of climbing. These conditions have resulted in some cases where handholds are included in the edges of interior trapdoors to assist with climbing the ladder.
Fig. 84. A Tusayan notched doorway.
Fig. 84. A Tusayan notched door.
Fig. 85. A large Tusayan
doorway with one notched jamb.
Fig. 85. A large Tusayan
doorway with a notched side.
One more characteristic type of the ancient pueblo doorway remains to be described. During the autumn of 1883, when the ruined pueblo of Kin-tiel was surveyed, a number of excavations were made in and about the pueblo. A small room on the east side, near the brink of the arroyo that traverses the ruin from east to west, was completely cleared out, exposing its fireplace, the stone paving of its floor, and other details of construction. Built into an inner partition of this room was found a large slab of stone, pierced with a circular hole of sufficient size for a man to squeeze through. This slab was set on edge and incorporated into the masonry of the partition, and evidently served as a means of communication with another room. The position of this doorway and its relation to the room in which it occurs may be seen from the illustration in Pl. C, which shows the stone in situ. The doorway or “stone-close” is shown in Fig. 86 on a sufficient scale to indicate the degree of technical skill in the architectural treatment of stone possessed by the builders of this old pueblo. The writer visited Zuñi in October of the same season, and on describing this find to Mr. Frank H. Cushing, learned that the Zuñi Indians still preserved traditional knowledge of this device. Mr. Cushing kindly furnished at the 193 time the following extract from the tale of “The Deer-Slayer and the Wizards,” a Zuñi folk-tale of the early occupancy of the valley of Zuñi.
One more type of ancient pueblo doorway is still to be described. In the autumn of 1883, when the ruined pueblo of Kin-tiel was surveyed, several excavations were made in and around the pueblo. A small room on the east side, near the edge of the arroyo that runs through the ruin from east to west, was entirely cleared out, revealing its fireplace, the stone floor, and other details of construction. Built into an inner wall of this room was a large stone slab with a circular hole big enough for a person to squeeze through. This slab was positioned upright and integrated into the masonry of the wall, and it clearly served as a way to communicate with another room. The location of this doorway and its connection to the room can be seen in the illustration in Pl. C, which shows the stone in place. The doorway or “stone-close” is shown in Fig. 86 at a scale that highlights the level of technical skill in stone architecture possessed by the builders of this old pueblo. The writer visited Zuñi in October of the same year, and while discussing this find with Mr. Frank H. Cushing, learned that the Zuñi Indians still maintained traditional knowledge of this feature. Mr. Cushing kindly provided at the 193 time the following excerpt from the tale of “The Deer-Slayer and the Wizards,” a Zuñi folk-tale from the early days of the Zuñi valley.
![]() |
Fig. 86.
An ancient circular doorway or “stone-close” in Kin-tiel. |
“‘How will they enter?’ said the young man to his wife. ‘Through the stone-close at the side,’ she answered. In the days of the ancients, the doorways were often made of a great slab of stone with a round hole cut through the middle, and a round stone slab to close it, which was called the stone-close, that the enemy might not enter in times of war.”
“‘How will they get in?’ the young man asked his wife. ‘Through the stone closure on the side,’ she replied. In ancient times, doorways were often made of a large slab of stone with a round hole cut in the middle and a round stone slab to cover it, which was called the stone closure, to prevent the enemy from entering during wartime.”
Mr. Cushing had found displaced fragments of such circular stone doorways at ruins some distance northwest from Zuñi, but had been under the impression that they were used as roof openings. All examples of this device known to the writer as having been found in place occurred in side walls of rooms. Mr. E. W. Nelson, while making collections of pottery from ruins near Springerville, Arizona, found and sent to the Smithsonian Institution, in the autumn of 1884, “a flat stone about 18 inches square with a round hole cut in the middle of it. This stone was taken from the wall of one of the old ruined stone houses near Springerville, in an Indian ruin. The stone was set in the wall between two inner rooms of the ruin, and evidently served as a means of communication or perhaps a ventilator. I send it on mainly as an example of their stone-working craft.” The position of this feature in the excavated room of Kin-tiel is indicated on the ground plan, Fig. 60, which also shows the position of other details seen in the general view of the room, Pl. C.
Mr. Cushing had found some circular stone doorways that were displaced at ruins located a bit northwest of Zuñi, but he thought they were used for roof openings. All the examples of this feature known to the writer were found in the side walls of rooms. Mr. E. W. Nelson, while collecting pottery from ruins near Springerville, Arizona, discovered a flat stone about 18 inches square with a round hole in the middle and sent it to the Smithsonian Institution in the fall of 1884. “This stone was taken from the wall of one of the old ruined stone houses near Springerville, in an Indian ruin. It was placed in the wall between two inner rooms of the ruin and clearly served as a means of communication or possibly as a vent. I'm sending it mainly as an example of their stone-working skills.” The location of this feature in the excavated room of Kin-tiel is marked on the ground plan, Fig. 60, which also shows the positions of other details seen in the general view of the room, Pl. C.
A small fragment of a “stone-close” doorway was found incorporated into the masonry of a flight of outside stone steps at Pescado, indicating its use in some neighboring ruin, thus bringing it well within the Cibola district. Another point at which similar remains have been brought to light is the pueblo of Halona, just across the river from the present Zuñi. Mr. F. Webb Hodge, recently connected with the Hemenway Southwestern Archeological Exposition, under the direction of Mr. F. H. Cushing, describes this form of opening as being of quite common occurrence in the rooms of this long-buried pueblo. Here the doorways are associated with the round slabs used for closing them. The latter were held in place by props within the room. No slabs of this form were seen at Kin-tiel, but quite possibly some of the large slabs of nearly rectangular form, found within this ruin, may have served the same purpose. It would seem more reasonable to use the rectangular 194 slabs for this purpose when the openings were conveniently near the floors. No example of the stone-close has as yet been found in Tusayan.
A small piece of a "stone-close" doorway was discovered built into the structure of a flight of outdoor stone steps at Pescado, suggesting it was used in a nearby ruin, placing it firmly within the Cibola area. Another location where similar remnants have been uncovered is the pueblo of Halona, right across the river from modern-day Zuñi. Mr. F. Webb Hodge, who was recently involved with the Hemenway Southwestern Archaeological Exposition led by Mr. F. H. Cushing, describes this type of opening as quite common in the rooms of this long-buried pueblo. In this case, the doorways are linked to the round slabs that were used to close them, which were supported by props inside the room. No slabs of this kind were found at Kin-tiel, but it’s quite possible that some of the large, nearly rectangular slabs discovered in this ruin may have served the same function. It seems more logical to use the rectangular slabs for this purpose when the openings were conveniently close to the floors. So far, no examples of the stone-close have been found in Tusayan.
The annular doorway described above affords the only instance known to the writer where access openings were closed with a rigid device of aboriginal invention; and from the character of its material this device was necessarily restricted to openings of small size. The larger rectangular doorways, when not partly closed by masonry, probably were covered only with blankets or skin rugs suspended from the lintel. In the discussion of sealed windows modern examples resembling the stone-close device will be noted, but these are usually employed in a more permanent manner.
The round doorway mentioned above is the only known example, according to the writer, where access points were blocked with a solid device created by indigenous people; and because of the type of material used, this device was limited to smaller openings. The bigger rectangular doorways, when not partially blocked by stonework, were likely just covered with blankets or animal hides hanging from the top. In the discussion about sealed windows, contemporary examples similar to the stone-close device will be highlighted, but these are typically used in a more permanent way.
The small size of the ordinary pueblo doorway was perhaps due as much to the fact that there was no convenient means of closing it as it was to defensive reasons. Many primitive habitations, even quite rude ones built with no intention of defense, are characterized by small doors and windows. The planning of dwellings and the distribution of openings in such a manner as to protect and render comfortable the inhabited rooms implies a greater advance in architectural skill than these builders had achieved.
The small size of the typical pueblo doorway was likely due as much to the lack of a convenient way to close it as it was to defensive needs. Many basic homes, even very simple ones not built for defense, have small doors and windows. The design of homes and the placement of openings to protect and create comfortable living spaces suggests a level of architectural skill that these builders hadn’t reached.
The inconveniently small size of the doorways of the modern pueblos is only a survival of ancient conditions. The use of full-sized doors, admitting a man without stooping, is entirely practicable at the present day, but the conservative builders persist in adhering to the early type. The ancient position of the door, with its sill at a considerable height from the ground, is also retained. From the absence of any convenient means of rigidly closing the doors and windows, in early times external openings were restricted to the smallest practicable dimensions. The convenience of these openings was increased without altering their dimensions by elevating them to a certain height above the ground. In the ruin of Kin-tiel there is marked uniformity in the height of the openings above the ground, and such openings were likely to be quite uniform when used for similar purposes. The most common elevation of the sills of doorways was such that a man could readily step over at one stride. It will be seen that the same economy of space has effected the use of windows in this system of architecture.
The inconveniently small size of the doorways in modern pueblos is just a remnant of ancient practices. Using full-sized doors that allow a person to walk through without bending down is totally doable today, but traditional builders stick to the old style. They still keep the old position of the door, with its sill set high off the ground. Because there weren't any reliable ways to securely close doors and windows back in the day, exterior openings were kept to the smallest sizes possible. The usefulness of these openings was enhanced by raising them to a certain height off the ground without changing their size. In the ruins of Kin-tiel, there's a noticeable uniformity in the height of these openings, and they likely stayed consistent when serving similar functions. The most common height for door sills was set so a person could easily step over in one stride. You'll see that the same principle of saving space applies to the use of windows in this architectural style.
WINDOWS.
In the pueblo system of building, doors and windows are not always clearly differentiated. Many of the openings, while used for access to the dwellings, also answer all the purposes of windows, and, both in their form and in their position in the walls, seem more fully to meet the requirements of openings for the admission of light and air than for access. We have seen in the illustrations in Chapters III and IV, openings of considerable size so located in the face of the outer wall as to unfit them for use as doorways, and others whose size is wholly inadequate, but which are still provided with the typical though diminutive 195 single-paneled door. Many of these small openings, occurring most frequently in the back walls of house rows, have the jambs, lintels, etc., characteristic of the typical modern door. However, as the drawings above referred to indicate, there are many openings concerning the use of which there can be no doubt, as they can only provide outlook, light, and air.
In the pueblo building system, doors and windows aren't always clearly defined. Many of the openings used for entering the homes also serve the functions of windows, and in both their design and placement in the walls, they seem better suited for letting in light and air than for providing access. We've seen in the illustrations in Chapters III and IV, openings of considerable size positioned on the outer wall that make them unsuitable as doorways, and others that are too small but still feature the typical yet tiny 195 single-paneled door. Many of these small openings, which appear most often in the back walls of rows of houses, have the jams, lintels, etc., typical of modern doors. However, as the mentioned drawings show, there are many openings where their use is clear; they exist solely to provide views, light, and air.
In the most common form of window in present use in Tusayan and Cibola the width usually exceeds the height. Although found often in what appear to be the older portions of the present pueblos, this shape probably does not date very far back. The windows of the ancient pueblos were sometimes square, or nearly so, when of small size, but when larger they were never distinguishable from doorways in either size or finish, and the height exceeded the width. This restriction of the width of openings was due to the exceptionally small size of the building stone made use of. Although larger stones were available, the builders had not sufficient constructive skill to successfully utilize them. The failure to utilize this material indicates a degree of ignorance of mechanical aids that at first thought seems scarcely in keeping with the massiveness of form and the high degree of finish characterizing many of the remains; but as already seen in the discussion of masonry, the latter results were attained by the patient industry of many hands, although laboring with but little of the spirit of cooperation. The narrowness of the largest doors and windows in the ancient pueblos suggests timidity on the part of the ancient builders. The apparently bolder construction of the present day, shown in the prevailing use of horizontal openings, is not due to greater constructive skill, but rather to the markedly greater carelessness of modern construction.
In the most common type of window currently found in Tusayan and Cibola, the width usually exceeds the height. While these windows are often seen in what looks like the older parts of the existing pueblos, this design likely doesn't go back very far. The windows in ancient pueblos were sometimes square, or nearly so, if they were small, but when they were larger, they were indistinguishable from doorways in both size and finish, with height greater than width. This limitation on the width of openings was due to the unusually small size of the building stones used. Although bigger stones were available, the builders lacked the skills to use them effectively. The failure to make use of this material suggests a lack of knowledge about mechanical aids, which at first seems inconsistent with the impressive size and high quality of many of the remains. However, as discussed in the masonry section, those results were achieved through the dedicated efforts of many workers, even though they didn't cooperate well. The narrowness of the largest doors and windows in ancient pueblos hints at hesitation on the part of the builders. The seemingly bolder construction we see today, with the common use of horizontal openings, isn't a result of improved building skills but rather a reflection of the noticeably more careless approach to modern construction.
The same contrast between modern and ancient practice is seen in the disposition of openings in walls. In the modern pueblos there does not seem to be any regularity or system in their introduction, while in some of the older pueblos, such as Pueblo Bonito on the Chaco, and others of the same group, the arrangement of the outer openings exhibits a certain degree of symmetry. The accompanying diagram, Fig. 87, illustrates a portion of the northern outer wall of Pueblo Bonito, in which the small windows of successive rooms, besides being uniform in size, are grouped in pairs. The degree of technical skill shown in the execution of the masonry about these openings is in keeping with the precision with which the openings themselves are placed. Pl. CV, gives a view of a portion of the wall containing these openings.
The same contrast between modern and ancient practices can be seen in how openings are arranged in walls. In modern pueblos, there doesn't seem to be any regular pattern or system for their placement, while in some of the older pueblos, like Pueblo Bonito in Chaco and others in the same area, the layout of the outer openings shows a certain level of symmetry. The accompanying diagram, Fig. 87, illustrates a part of the northern outer wall of Pueblo Bonito, where the small windows of consecutive rooms, in addition to being the same size, are grouped in pairs. The level of craftsmanship evident in the masonry around these openings matches the precision with which the openings themselves are arranged. Pl. Resume, provides a view of a section of the wall that contains these openings.
Plate CV. Small square openings in Pueblo Bonito.
Plate CV. Small square openings in Pueblo Bonito.
![]() |
Fig. 87.
Diagram illustrating symmetrical arrangement of small openings in Pueblo Bonito. |
196 In marked contrast to the above examples is the slovenly practice of the modern pueblos. There are rarely two openings of the same size, even in a single room, nor are these usually placed at a uniform height from the floor. The placing appears to be purely a matter of individual taste, and no trace of system or uniformity is to be found. Windows occur sometimes at considerable height, near or even at the ceiling in some cases, while others are placed almost at the base of the wall; examples may be found occupying all intermediate heights between these extremes. Many of the illustrations show this characteristic irregularity, but Pls. LXXIX and LXXXII of Zuñi perhaps represent it most clearly.
196 In stark contrast to the previous examples is the careless design of the modern pueblos. There are hardly ever two openings of the same size, even within a single room, and they are usually not at a consistent height from the floor. The positioning seems to be entirely based on personal preference, and there is no sign of any system or uniformity. Windows can sometimes be placed quite high, near or even at the ceiling, while others are positioned almost at the floor level; you'll find examples at every height in between. Many of the illustrations display this irregularity, but Pls. LXXIX and L82 of Zuñi perhaps illustrate it most clearly.
The framing of these openings differs but little from that of the ancient examples. The modern opening is distinguished principally by the more careless method of combining the materials, and by the introduction in many instances of a rude sash. A number of small poles or sticks, usually of cedar, with the bark peeled off, are laid side by side in contact, across the opening, to form a support for the stones and earth of the superposed masonry. Frequently a particularly large tablet of stone is placed immediately upon the sticks, but this stone is never long enough or thick enough to answer the purpose of a lintel for larger openings. The number of small sticks used is sufficient to reach from the face to the back of the wall, and in the simplest openings the surrounding masonry forms jambs and sill. American or Spanish influence occasionally shows itself in the employment of sawed boards for lintels, sills, and jambs. The wooden features of the windows exhibit a curiously light and flimsy construction.
The way these openings are framed is similar to ancient examples. The modern opening mainly stands out because of the more casual way the materials are combined and often includes a rough sash. Several small poles or sticks, usually made of cedar with the bark removed, are laid side by side across the opening to support the stones and earth of the masonry built above. Often, a particularly large stone tablet is placed directly on the sticks, but this stone is never long or thick enough to serve as a lintel for larger openings. The number of small sticks used is enough to extend from the front to the back of the wall, and in the simplest openings, the surrounding masonry creates the jambs and sill. Sometimes, American or Spanish influences are evident in the use of sawn boards for lintels, sills, and jambs. The wooden elements of the windows feature a surprisingly light and flimsy construction.
A large percentage of the windows, in both Tusayan and Cibola, are furnished with glass at the present time. Occasionally a primitive sash of several lights is found, but frequently the glass is used singly; in some instances it is set directly into the adobe without any intervening sash or frame. In several cases in Zuñi the primitive sash or frame has been rudely decorated with incised lines and notches. An example of this is shown in Fig. 88. The frame or sash is usually built solidly into the wall. Hinged sashes do not seem to have been adopted as yet. Often the introduction of lights shows a curious and awkward compromise between aboriginal methods and foreign ideas.
A large number of the windows in both Tusayan and Cibola now have glass. Sometimes you’ll find a simple multi-pane frame, but often the glass is used individually; in some cases, it’s directly embedded in the adobe without any kind of sash or frame. In some instances in Zuñi, the simple frame has been roughly decorated with incised lines and notches. An example of this is shown in Fig. 88. The frame is typically built solidly into the wall. Hinged frames don’t seem to have been used yet. The introduction of glass often reflects a strange and awkward mix of traditional methods and outside influences.
Fig. 88.
Incised decoration
on a rude window sash in Zuñi.
Fig. 88.
Carved decoration
on a rough window frame in Zuñi.
Characteristic of Zuñi windows, and also of those of the neighboring pueblo of Acoma, is the use of semitranslucent slabs of selenite, about 1 inch in thickness and of irregular form. Pieces are occasionally met with about 18 inches long and 8 or 10 inches 197 wide, but usually they are much smaller and very irregular in outline. For windows pieces are selected that approximately fit against each other, and thin, flat strips of wood are fixed in a vertical position in the openings to serve as supports for the irregular fragments of selenite, which could not be retained in place without some such provision. The use of window openings at the bases of walls probably suggested this use of vertical sticks as a support to slabs of selenite, as in this position they would be particularly useful, the windows being generally arranged on a slope, as shown in Fig. 89. Similar glazing is also employed in the related, obliquely pierced openings of Zuñi, to be described later.
Characteristic of Zuñi windows, and also those of the nearby pueblo of Acoma, is the use of semi-transparent slabs of selenite, approximately 1 inch thick and irregularly shaped. Occasionally, pieces measuring about 18 inches long and 8 or 10 inches wide are found, but typically they are much smaller and quite irregular in shape. For windows, pieces are chosen that closely fit together, and thin, flat strips of wood are installed vertically in the openings to support the uneven selenite fragments, which wouldn't stay in place without this support. The idea of using vertical sticks to hold the selenite slabs likely came from the window openings at the bases of walls, as this setup would be particularly effective, with the windows usually arranged on a slope, as shown in Fig. 89. A similar glazing technique is also used in the related obliquely pierced openings of Zuñi, which will be described later.
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 89.
Sloping selenite window at base of Zuñi wall on upper terrace. |
Selenite, in all probability, was not used in pre-Spanish times. No examples have as yet been met with among ruins in the region where this material is found and now used. Throughout the south and east portion of the ancient pueblo region, explored by Mr. A. F. Bandelier, where many of the remains were in a very good state of preservation, no cases of the use of this substance were seen. Fig. 90 illustrates a typical selenite window.
Selenite was likely not used before the Spanish arrived. There haven’t been any examples found among the ruins in the area where this material is located and currently used. In the southern and eastern parts of the ancient pueblo region, which Mr. A. F. Bandelier explored, many remains were well-preserved, but no instances of this substance’s use were observed. Fig. 90 illustrates a typical selenite window.
![]() |
Fig. 90.
A Zuñi window glazed with selenite. |
In Zuñi some of the kivas are provided with small external windows framed with slabs of stone. It is likely that the kivas would for a long time perpetuate methods and practices that had been superseded in the construction of dwellings. The use of stone jambs, however, would necessarily be limited to openings of small size, as such use for large openings was beyond the mechanical skill of the pueblo builders.
In Zuñi, some of the kivas have small external windows framed with stone slabs. It's likely that the kivas continued to use methods and practices that had already been replaced in home construction for a long time. However, the use of stone jambs would be limited to small openings because using them for large openings was beyond the mechanical skill of the pueblo builders.
198 Fig. 91 illustrates the manner of making small openings in external exposed walls in Zuñi. Stone frames occur only occasionally in what seem to be the older and least modified portions of the village. At Tusayan, however, this method of framing windows is much more noticeable, as the exceptional crowding that has exercised such an influence on Zuñi construction has not occurred there. The Tusayan houses are arranged more in rows, often with a suggestion of large inclosures resembling the courts of the ancient pueblos. The inclosures have not been encroached upon, the streets are wider, and altogether the earlier methods seem to have been retained in greater purity than in Zuñi. The unbroken outer wall, of two or three stories in height, like the same feature of the old villages, is pierced at various heights with small openings that do not seriously impair its efficiency for defense. Tusayan examples of these loop-hole-like openings maybe seen in Pls. XXII, XXIII, and XXXIX.
198 Fig. 91 shows how to create small openings in the outer walls of Zuñi. Stone frames are only found occasionally in the older and less modified parts of the village. However, in Tusayan, this method of framing windows is much more apparent, as the overcrowding that has impacted Zuñi's construction hasn't happened there. The houses in Tusayan are laid out more in rows, often resembling large enclosed spaces similar to the courts of ancient pueblos. These enclosures have not been encroached upon, the streets are wider, and overall, the earlier building techniques seem to have been preserved more faithfully than in Zuñi. The unbroken outer wall, which spans two or three stories high, like the walls of the old villages, has small openings at various heights that don’t significantly compromise its defensive capabilities. Examples of these loop-hole-like openings in Tusayan can be seen in Pls. XXII, XXIII, and XXXIX.
Fig. 91. Small openings in the back wall of a Zuñi house-cluster.
Fig. 91. Small openings in the back wall of a Zuñi house cluster.
In some of the ancient pueblos such openings were arranged on a distinctly defensive plan, and were constructed with great care. Openings of this type, not more than 4 inches square, pierced the second story outer wall of the pueblo of Wejegi in the Chaco Canyon. In the pueblo of Kin-tiel (Pl. LXIII) similar loop-hole-like openings were very skillfully constructed in the outer wall at the rounded northeastern corner of the pueblo. The openings pierced the wall at an oblique angle, as shown on the plan. Two of these channel-like loopholes maybe seen in Pl. LXV. This figure also shows the carefully executed jamb corners and faces of three large openings of the second story, which, though greatly undermined by the falling away of the lower masonry, are still held in position by the bond of thin flat stones of which the wall is built.
In some of the ancient pueblos, such openings were designed with a clear defensive strategy and were built with great attention to detail. Openings like these, no larger than 4 inches square, were found in the second story outer wall of the pueblo of Wejegi in Chaco Canyon. In the pueblo of Kin-tiel (Pl. LXIII), similar loophole-like openings were expertly made in the outer wall at the rounded northeastern corner of the pueblo. The openings cut through the wall at an angle, as shown in the plan. Two of these channel-like loopholes can be seen in Pl. LXV. This figure also illustrates the carefully crafted jamb corners and faces of three large openings on the second story, which, although significantly eroded by the collapse of the lower masonry, remain supported by the connection of the thin flat stones that make up the wall.
Plate CVI. Sealed openings in a detached house of Nutria.
Plate CVI. Sealed openings in a detached house in Nutria.
It is often the practice in the modern pueblos to seal up the windows of a house with masonry, and sometimes the doors also during the temporary absence of the occupant, which absence often takes place at the seasons of planting and harvesting. At such times many Zuñi families occupy outlying farming pueblos, such as Nutria and Pescado, and the 199 Tusayans, in a like manner, live in rude summer shelters close to their fields. Such absence from the home pueblo often lasts for a month or more at a time. The work of closing the opening is done sometimes in the roughest manner, but examples are seen in which carefully laid masonry has been used. The latter is sometimes plastered. Occasionally the sealing is done with a thin slab of sandstone, somewhat larger than the opening, held in place with mud plastering, or propped from the inside after the manner of the “stone close” previously described. Fig. 92 illustrates specimens of sealed openings in the village of Hano of the Tusayan group. The upper window is closed with a single large slab and a few small chinking stones at one side. The masonry used in closing the lower opening is scarcely distinguishable from that of the adjoining walls. Pl. CVI illustrates a similar treatment of an opening in a detached house of Nutria, whose occupants had returned to the home pueblo of Zuñi at the close of the harvesting season. The doorway in this case is only partly closed, leaving a window-like aperture at 200 its top, and the stones used for the purpose are simply piled up without the use of adobe mortar.
It is common practice in modern pueblos to seal up the windows of a house with masonry, and sometimes the doors as well, during the temporary absence of the occupants, which usually happens during the planting and harvesting seasons. At these times, many Zuñi families stay in outlying farming pueblos like Nutria and Pescado, while the Tusayans live in basic summer shelters close to their fields. This absence from the home pueblo can often last for a month or more. The work of closing these openings is sometimes done in a rough way, but there are also examples where carefully constructed masonry has been used. The latter is sometimes plastered. Occasionally, the sealing is done with a thin slab of sandstone that is slightly larger than the opening, secured with mud plaster or propped from the inside like the “stone close” mentioned earlier. Fig. 92 shows some examples of sealed openings in the village of Hano from the Tusayan group. The upper window is closed with a single large slab and a few small stones for support on one side. The masonry used to close the lower opening is barely distinguishable from the surrounding walls. Pl. CVI depicts a similar approach to sealing an opening in a detached house in Nutria, where the occupants returned to the home pueblo of Zuñi after the harvesting season. In this case, the doorway is only partially closed, leaving a window-like opening at the top, and the stones used are simply stacked without adobe mortar.
Fig. 92. Sealed openings in Tusayan.
Sealed openings in Tusayan.
Windows and doors closed with masonry are often met with in the remains of ancient pueblos, suggesting, perhaps, that some of the occupants were absent at the time of the destruction of the village. When large door-like openings in upper external walls were built up and plastered over in this way, as in some ruins, the purpose was to economize heat during the winter, as blankets or rugs made of skins would be inadequate.
Windows and doors that were closed off with bricks are commonly found in the remnants of ancient pueblos, indicating that some of the inhabitants might have been away when the village was destroyed. When large openings that resembled doors in the upper outer walls were bricked up and plastered over like in some ruins, it was meant to save heat during the winter, since blankets or rugs made of animal skins wouldn't be enough.
Plate CVII. Partial filling-in of a large opening in Oraibi, converting it into a doorway.
Plate CVII. Partially filling in a large opening in Oraibi, turning it into a doorway.
Besides the closing and reopening of doors and windows just described, the modern pueblo builders frequently make permanent changes in such openings. Doors are often converted into windows, and windows are reduced in size or enlarged, or new ones are broken through the walls, apparently, with the greatest freedom, so that they do not, from their finish or method of construction, furnish any clue to the antiquity of the mud-covered wall in which they are found. Occasionally surface weathering of the walls, particularly in Zuñi, exposes a bit of horizontal pole embedded in the masonry, the lintel of a window long since sealed up and obliterated by successive coats of mud finish. It is probable that many openings are so covered up as to leave no trace of their existence on the external wall. In Zuñi particularly, where the original arrangement for entering and lighting many of the rooms must have been wholly lost in the dense clustering of later times, such changes are very numerous. It often happens that the addition of a new room will shut off one or more old windows, and in such cases the latter are often converted into interior niches which serve as open cupboards. Such niches were sometimes of considerable size in the older pueblos. Changes in the character of openings are quite common in all of the pueblos. Usually the evidences of such changes are much clearer in the rougher and more exposed work of Tusayan than in the adobe-finished houses of Zuñi. Pl. CVII illustrates a large, balcony-like opening in Oraibi that has been reduced to the size of an ordinary door by filling in with rough masonry. A small window has been left immediately over the lintel of the newer door. Pl. CVIII illustrates two large openings in this village that have been treated in a somewhat similar manner, but the filling has been carried farther. Both of these openings have been used as doorways at one stage of their reduction, the one on the right having been provided with a small transom; the combined opening was arranged wholly within the large one and under its transom. In the further conversion of this doorway into a small window, the secondary transom was blocked up with stone slabs, set on edge, and a small loophole window in the upper lefthand corner of the large opening was also closed. The masonry filling of the large opening on the left in this illustration shows no trace of a transom over the smaller doorway. A small loophole in the corner of this large opening is still left open. It will be noted that the original transoms of the large openings have in all these cases been entirely filled up with masonry.
Besides the closing and reopening of doors and windows mentioned earlier, modern pueblo builders often make permanent changes to these openings. Doors are frequently turned into windows, windows are either made smaller or larger, or new ones are created in the walls with apparent freedom, so their finish and method of construction don’t reveal the age of the mud-covered wall they’re in. Sometimes, surface weathering of the walls, especially in Zuñi, exposes a bit of horizontal pole embedded in the masonry, which is the lintel of a window that has long been sealed up and covered by layers of mud. It’s likely that many openings are hidden without leaving any trace on the external wall. In Zuñi particularly, where the original layout for entering and lighting many of the rooms must have been completely lost due to the dense clustering over time, such changes are very common. Often, the addition of a new room will block one or more old windows, and in these cases, the old windows are often converted into interior niches that serve as open cupboards. These niches could sometimes be quite large in the older pueblos. Changes in the nature of openings are quite common across all pueblos. Usually, the evidence of such changes is much clearer in the rougher, more exposed work of Tusayan than in the adobe-finished houses of Zuñi. Pl. CVII shows a large, balcony-like opening in Oraibi that has been reduced to the size of a standard door by filling it in with rough masonry. A small window has been left just above the lintel of the newer door. Pl. CVIII shows two large openings in this village treated in a similar way, but the filling has gone further. Both openings were used as doorways at one point in their reduction, with the one on the right having a small transom; the combined opening was situated entirely within the larger one and beneath its transom. In converting this doorway into a small window, the secondary transom was blocked up with stone slabs set on edge, and a small loophole window in the upper left corner of the large opening was also closed. The masonry filling of the large opening on the left in this illustration shows no sign of a transom over the smaller doorway. A small loophole in the corner of this large opening is still left open. It should be noted that the original transoms of the large openings have, in all these cases, been completely filled with masonry.
Plate CVIII. Large openings reduced to small windows, Oraibi.
Plate CVIII. Big openings turned into small windows, Oraibi.
The clearness with which all the steps of the gradual reduction of these openings can be traced in the exposed stone work is in marked contrast with the obscurity of such features in Zuñi. In the latter group, however, examples are occasionally seen where a doorway has been partly closed with masonry, leaving enough space at the top for a window. Often in such cases the filled-in masonry is thinner than that of the adjoining wall, and consequently the form of the original doorway is easily traced. Fig. 93, from an adobe wall in Zuñi, gives an illustration of this. The entrance doorway of the detached Zuñi house illustrated in Pl. LXXXIII, has been similarly reduced in size, leaving traces of the original form in a slight offset. In modern times, both in Tusayan and Cibola, changes in the form and disposition of openings seem to have been made with the greatest freedom, but in the ancient pueblos altered doors or windows have rarely been found. The original placing of these features was more carefully considered, and the buildings were rarely subjected to unforeseen and irregular crowding.
The clarity with which all the steps of the gradual reduction of these openings can be seen in the exposed stonework sharply contrasts with the obscurity of such features in Zuñi. In that group, however, there are occasionally examples where a doorway has been partially closed with masonry, leaving enough space at the top for a window. Often, in these cases, the filled-in masonry is thinner than that of the adjacent wall, making the shape of the original doorway easy to trace. Fig. 93, from an adobe wall in Zuñi, provides an illustration of this. The entrance doorway of the detached Zuñi house illustrated in Pl. L83, has been similarly downsized, leaving traces of the original shape in a slight offset. In modern times, both in Tusayan and Cibola, changes in the shape and arrangement of openings seem to have been made quite freely, but in the ancient pueblos, altered doors or windows are rarely found. The original placement of these features was more carefully considered, and the buildings were seldom subject to unexpected and uneven crowding.
Fig. 93. A Zuñi doorway converted into a window.
Fig. 93. A Zuñi doorway changed into a window.
In both ancient and modern pueblo work, windows, used only as such, seem to have been universally quadrilateral, offsets and steps being confined exclusively to doorways.
In both ancient and modern pueblo work, windows, used solely for that purpose, appear to have always been square or rectangular, with offsets and steps limited only to doorways.
ROOF OPENINGS.
The line of separation between roof openings and doors and windows is, with few exceptions, sharply drawn. The origin of these roof-holes, whose use at the present time is widespread, was undoubtedly in the simple trap door which gave access to the rooms of the first terrace. Pl. XXXVIII, illustrating a court of Oraibi, shows in the foreground a kiva hatchway of the usual form seen in Tusayan. Here there is but little difference between the entrance traps of the ceremonial chambers and those that give access to the rooms of the first terrace; the former are in most cases somewhat larger to admit of ingress of costumed dancers, 202 and the kiva traps are usually on a somewhat sharper slope, conforming to the pitch of the small dome-roof of the kivas, while those of the house terraces have the scarcely perceptible fall of the house roofs in which they are placed. In Zuñi, however, where the development and use of openings has been carried further, the kiva hatchways are distinguished by a specialized form that will be described later. An examination of the plans of the modern villages in Chapters II and III will show the general distribution of roof openings. Those used as hatchways are distinguishable by their greater dimensions, and in many cases by the presence of the ladders that give access to the rooms below. The smaller roof openings in their simplest form are constructed in essentially the same manner as the trap doors, and the width is usually regulated by the distance between two adjacent roof beams. The second series of small roof poles is interrupted at the sides of the opening, which sides are finished by means of carefully laid small stones in the same manner as are projecting copings. This finish is often carried several inches above the roof and crowned with narrow stone slabs, one on each of the four sides, forming a sort of frame which protects the mud plastered sides of the opening from the action of the rains. Examples of this simple type may be seen in many of the figures illustrating Chapters II and III, and in Pl. XCVII. Fig. 94 also illustrates common types of roof openings seen in Zuñi. Two of the examples in this figure are 203 of openings that give access to lower rooms. Occasional instances are seen in this pueblo in which an exaggerated height is given to the coping, the result slightly approaching a square chimney in effect. Fig. 95 illustrates an example of this form.
The boundary between roof openings and doors and windows is, with few exceptions, clearly defined. The origins of these roof holes, which are commonly used today, undoubtedly trace back to the simple trapdoor that provided access to the rooms on the first terrace. Pl. XXXVIII, showing a courtyard in Oraibi, features a kiva hatchway of the typical style found in Tusayan. Here, there’s little distinction between the entrance traps of the ceremonial chambers and those leading to the rooms on the first terrace; the former are generally a bit larger to allow for the entry of costumed dancers, 202 and the kiva traps tend to have a steeper slope, aligning with the incline of the small dome-shaped roofs of the kivas, while those of the house terraces have barely noticeable slopes that match the house roofs they are set into. However, in Zuñi, where the design and usage of openings have been further developed, the kiva hatchways are marked by a specialized design that will be discussed later. A look at the layouts of the modern villages in Chapters II and III will reveal the overall placement of roof openings. The ones used as hatchways can be identified by their larger size, and in many cases, by the ladders that provide access to the rooms below. The smaller roof openings, in their simplest form, are constructed much like the trapdoors, with width typically determined by the spacing between two adjacent roof beams. The second series of smaller roof poles is interrupted at the edges of the opening, which are finished with carefully laid small stones, similar to projecting copings. This finish is often extended a few inches above the roof and topped with narrow stone slabs on each of the four sides, creating a frame that shields the mud-plastered sides of the opening from rain. Examples of this straightforward type can be found in many of the figures illustrating Chapters II and III, and in Pl. XCVII. Fig. 94 also depicts common styles of roof openings seen in Zuñi. Two of the examples in this figure are 203 openings that lead to lower rooms. Occasionally, in this pueblo, one can see instances where the coping is exaggeratedly tall, resulting in a look somewhat akin to a square chimney. Fig. 95 shows an example of this design.
Fig. 94. Zuñi roof-openings.
Fig. 94. Zuñi roof openings.
In Zuñi, where many minor variations in the forms of roof openings occur, certain of these variations appear to be related to roof drainage. These have three sides crowned in the usual manner with coping stones laid flat, but the fourth side is formed by setting a thin slab on edge, as illustrated in Fig. 96.
In Zuñi, where there are many slight differences in the shapes of roof openings, some of these differences seem to be connected to roof drainage. These openings have three sides topped off in the usual way with flat coping stones, but the fourth side is created by placing a thin slab on its edge, as shown in Fig. 96.
Fig. 95. A Zuñi roof opening, with raised coping.
Fig. 95. A Zuñi roof opening, featuring elevated edging.
204 The special object of this arrangement is in some cases difficult to determine; the raised end in all the examples on any one roof always takes the same direction, and in many cases its position relative to drainage suggests that it is a provision against flooding by rain on the slightly sloping roof; but this relation to drainage is by no means constant. Roof holes on the west side of the village in such positions as to be directly exposed to the violent sand storms that prevail here during certain months of the year seem in some cases to have in view protection against the flying sand. We do not meet with evidence of any fixed system to guide the disposition of this feature. In many cases these trap holes are provided with a thin slab of sandstone large enough to cover the whole opening, and used in times of rain. During fair weather these are laid on the roof, near the hole they are designed to cover, or lie tilted against the higher edge of the trap, as shown in Fig. 97.
204 Determining the specific purpose of this setup can be challenging. The raised end on each roof consistently points in the same direction, and often its positioning in relation to drainage suggests it's meant to prevent flooding from rain on the slightly sloped roofs. However, this relationship to drainage isn't always the same. Roof holes on the west side of the village, positioned to be directly exposed to the harsh sandstorms that occur here during certain months, seem to be designed to offer protection against blowing sand. There's no evidence of a consistent system guiding the placement of this feature. In many instances, these trap holes have a thin slab of sandstone that can completely cover the opening and is used during rainy weather. On clear days, these slabs are placed on the roof near the hole they are meant to cover, or propped up against the higher edge of the trap, as shown in Fig. 97.
Fig. 96. Zuñi roof-openings, with one elevated end.
Fig. 96. Zuñi roof openings, featuring one raised end.
When the cover is placed on one of these holes, with a high slab at one end, it has a steep pitch, to shed water, and at the same time light and air are to some extent admitted, but it is very doubtful if this is the result of direct intention on the part of the builder. The possible development of this roof trap of unusual elevation into a rudimentary chimney has already been mentioned in the discussion of chimneys. A development in this direction would possibly be suggested by the desirability of separating the access by ladder from the inconvenient smoke hole. This must have been brought very forcibly to the attention of the Indian when, at the time a fire was burning in the fireplace, they were compelled to descend the ladder amidst the smoke and heat.
When a cover is placed over one of these holes, with a higher slab on one end, it creates a steep slope to drain water, while still allowing some light and air to come in. However, it's unclear if this was intentionally designed by the builder. The potential evolution of this oddly elevated roof trap into a basic chimney has already been discussed in the section about chimneys. This development might have been inspired by the need to keep ladder access separate from the troublesome smoke hole. This issue would have become very apparent to the Indian when, during a fire in the fireplace, they had to climb down the ladder through the smoke and heat.
Fig. 97. A Zuñi roof hole with cover.
Fig. 97. A Zuñi roof opening with a cover.
The survival to the present time of such an inconvenient arrangement in the kivas can be explained only on the ground of the intense conservatism of these people in all that pertains to religion. In the small roof holes methods of construction are seen which would not be so practicable on the larger scale of the ladder holes after which they have been modeled. In these latter the sides are built up of masonry or adobe, but the framing around them is more like the usual coping over walls. The stone that, set on edge in the small openings built for the admission of light, forms a raised end never occurs in these. The ladder for access rests against the coping.
The fact that such an inconvenient design still exists in the kivas can only be explained by the strong conservatism of these people regarding their religious practices. In the small roof holes, construction methods can be observed that wouldn’t work as well on the larger scale of the ladder holes they were modeled after. In those larger holes, the sides are made of masonry or adobe, but the framing around them resembles the usual coping over walls more closely. The stone, which is set on edge in the small openings made for light, creating a raised edge, is never found in these. The ladder for access leans against the coping.
When occurring in connection with kivas, ladder holes have certain peculiarities in which they differ from the ordinary form used in dwellings. The opening in such cases is made of large size to admit dancers in costume with full paraphernalia. These, the largest roof openings to be found in Zuñi, are framed with pieces of wood. The methods of holding the pieces in place vary somewhat in minor detail. It is quite likely that recent examples, while still preserving the form and general appearance of the earlier ones, would bear evidence that the builders had used their knowledge of improved methods of joining and finishing.
When found in connection with kivas, ladder holes have specific features that set them apart from the typical ones used in homes. The opening in these cases is larger to accommodate dancers in full costumes and gear. These are the largest roof openings found in Zuñi and are framed with wooden pieces. The ways of securing these pieces can vary slightly in detail. It's likely that recent examples, while maintaining the form and overall look of the earlier ones, show that the builders applied their knowledge of better methods for joining and finishing.
Fig. 98. Kiva trapdoor in Zuñi.
Kiva trapdoor in Zuni.
As may readily be seen from the illustration, Fig. 98, this framing, by the addition of a cross piece, divides the opening unequally. The smaller aperture is situated immediately above the fireplace (which conforms to the ancient type without chimney and located in the open floor of the room) and is very evidently designed to furnish an outlet to the smoke. In a chamber having no side doors or windows, or at most 206 very small square windows, and consequently no drafts, the column of smoke and flame can often on still nights be seen rising vertically from the roof. The other portion of the opening containing the ladder is used for ingress and egress. This singular combination strongly suggests that at no very remote period one opening was used to answer both purposes, as it still does in the Tusayan kivas. It also suggests the direction in which differentiation of functions began to take place, which in the kiva was delayed and held back by the conservative religious feeling, when in the civil architecture it may have been the initial point of a development that culminated in the chimney, a development that was assisted in its later steps by suggestions from foreign sources. In the more primitively constructed examples the cross pieces seem to be simply laid on without any cutting in. The central piece is held in place by a peg set into each side piece, the weight and thrust of the ladder helping to hold it. The primitive arrangement here seen has been somewhat improved upon in some other cases, but it was not ascertained whether these were of later date or not.
As you can clearly see from the illustration, Fig. 98, this framing, with the addition of a crosspiece, creates an uneven division of the opening. The smaller space is positioned directly above the fireplace (which follows the ancient style lacking a chimney and located on the open floor of the room) and is clearly intended to allow smoke to escape. In a room without side doors or windows, or with only very small square windows and, therefore, little to no drafts, you can often see the column of smoke and flame rising straight up from the roof on calm nights. The other part of the opening that contains the ladder is used for entering and exiting. This unique combination suggests that not too long ago, one opening served both purposes, just like it does in the Tusayan kivas. It also indicates the direction in which functions began to differentiate, which in the kiva was delayed due to conservative religious beliefs, whereas in civil architecture, it may have been the starting point of a development that eventually led to the chimney, a process that was further influenced by ideas from external sources. In the more primitively built examples, the crosspieces seem to be simply laid on without being cut into. The central piece is secured in place by a peg on each side piece, with the weight and pressure of the ladder helping to keep it steady. This basic arrangement seen here has been somewhat improved in other cases, but it wasn't determined if those were of a later date or not.
In the best made frames for kiva entrances the timbers are “halved” in the manner of our carpenters, the joint being additionally secured by a pin as shown in Fig. 99.
In the best-built frames for kiva entrances, the timbers are “halved” like our carpenters do, with the joint also secured by a pin as shown in Fig. 99.
![]() |
Fig. 99.
Halved and pinned trapdoor frame of a Zuñi kiva. |
The use of a frame of wood in these trapdoors dates back to a comparatively high antiquity, and is not at all a modern innovation, as one would at first be inclined to believe. Their use in so highly developed a form in the ceremonial chamber is an argument in favor of antiquity. Only two examples were discovered by Mr. L. H. Morgan in a ruined pueblo on the Animas. “One of these measured 16 by 17 inches and the other was 16 inches square. Each was formed in the floor by pieces of wood put together. The work was neatly done.”8
The use of wooden frames in these trapdoors goes back quite a while and isn’t a modern creation, as one might initially think. Their presence in such an advanced form in the ceremonial chamber supports the idea of their ancient origins. Mr. L. H. Morgan found only two examples in a ruined pueblo on the Animas. “One measured 16 by 17 inches, and the other was 16 inches square. Each was made in the floor with pieces of wood put together. The craftsmanship was neat.”8
Unfortunately, Mr. Morgan does not describe in detail the manner in which the joining was effected, or whether the pieces were halved or cut to fit. It seems hardly likely, considering the rude facilities possessed by the ancients, that the enormous labor of reducing large pieces of wood to such interfitting shapes would have been undertaken. A certain neatness of finish would undoubtedly be attained by arranging the principal roof beams and the small poles that cross them at right angles, in the usual careful manner of the ancient builders. The kiva roof opening, with the hole serving for access and smoke exit, is paralleled 207 in the excavated lodges of the San Francisco Mountains, where a single opening served this double purpose. A slight recess or excavation in the side of the entrance shaft evidently served for the exit of smoke.
Unfortunately, Mr. Morgan doesn’t go into detail about how the joining was done or whether the pieces were halved or cut to fit. It seems unlikely, given the primitive tools available to the ancients, that the significant effort of shaping large pieces of wood to fit together would have been taken on. There would surely be some neatness achieved by arranging the main roof beams and the smaller poles that cross them at right angles, following the careful methods of ancient builders. The opening in the kiva roof, with the hole for access and smoke exit, is similar to those found in the excavated lodges of the San Francisco Mountains, where a single opening served both functions. A slight recess or groove on the side of the entrance shaft clearly served as a smoke exit. 207
At the village of Acoma the kiva trapdoors differ somewhat from the Zuñi form. The survey of this village was somewhat hasty, and no opportunity was afforded of ascertaining from the Indians the special purpose of the mode of construction adopted. The roof hole is divided, as in Zuñi, but the portion against which the ladder leans, instead of being made into a smoke vent, is provided with a small roof. These roof holes to the ceremonial chamber are entered directly from the open air, while in the dwelling rooms it seems customary (much more customary than at Zuñi) to enter the lower stories through trapdoors within upper rooms. In many instances second-story rooms have no exterior rooms but are entered from rooms above, contrary to the usual arrangement in both Tusayan and Cibola. All six of the kivas in this village are provided with this peculiarly constructed opening.
At the village of Acoma, the kiva trapdoors are a bit different from the ones in Zuñi. The survey of this village was done rather quickly, so there wasn't a chance to ask the locals about the specific purpose behind their construction method. The hole in the roof is divided like in Zuñi, but instead of having a smoke vent where the ladder leans, it has a small roof. These roof holes leading to the ceremonial chamber can be accessed directly from outside, while in the living spaces, it seems to be much more common (way more common than in Zuñi) to enter the lower levels through trapdoors in the upper rooms. In many cases, second-story rooms don’t have exterior doors and are accessed from the rooms above, which is different from the usual setup in both Tusayan and Cibola. All six kivas in this village have this uniquely designed opening.
In Zuñi close crowding of the cells has led to an exceptionally frequent use of roof-lights and trapdoors. The ingenuity of the builders was greatly taxed to admit sufficient light to the inner rooms. The roof hole, which was originally used only to furnish the means of access and light for the first terrace, as is still the case in Tusayan, is here used in all stories indiscriminately, and principally for light and air. In large clusters there are necessarily many dark rooms, which has led to the employment of great numbers of roof holes, more or less directly modeled after the ordinary trapdoor. Their occurrence is particularly frequent in the larger clusters of the village, as in house No. 1. The exceptional size of this pile, and of the adjoining house No. 4, with the consequent large proportion of dark rooms, have taxed the ingenuity of the Zuñi to the utmost, and as a result we see roof openings here assuming a degree of importance not found elsewhere.
In Zuñi, the tight spacing of the cells has resulted in a very frequent use of roof windows and trapdoors. The builders had to get really creative to let in enough light into the inner rooms. The roof opening, which was originally used just to provide access and light for the first terrace, like it still is in Tusayan, is now used in all stories without distinction, mainly for light and ventilation. In large clusters, there are inevitably many dark rooms, which has led to the use of numerous roof openings, somewhat resembling the regular trapdoor. These are particularly common in the larger groups of the village, such as in house No. 1. The unusually large size of this building and the neighboring house No. 4, along with the resulting high number of dark rooms, have pushed the Zuñi's ingenuity to its limits, and as a result, we see roof openings here becoming more significant than in other places.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 100.
Typical sections of Zuñi oblique openings. |
In addition to roof openings of the type described, the dense clustering of the Zuñi houses has led to the invention of a curious device for lighting inner rooms not reached by ordinary external openings. This consists of an opening, usually of oval or subrectangular form in elevation, placed at the junction of the roof with a vertical wall. This opening is carried down obliquely between the roofing beams, as shown in the sections, Fig. 100, so that the light is admitted within the room just at the junction of the ceiling and the inner face of the wall. With the meager facilities and rude methods of the Zuñi, this peculiar arrangement often involved weak construction, and the openings, placed so low in the wall, were in danger of admitting water from the roof. The difficulty of obtaining the desired light by this device was much lessened where the outer roof was somewhat lower than the ceiling within.
In addition to the roof openings mentioned, the close clustering of Zuñi houses has led to the creation of an interesting device for lighting inner rooms that aren't accessible by regular external openings. This consists of an opening, usually oval or slightly rectangular in shape from the side view, located at the junction where the roof meets a vertical wall. This opening slopes down between the roofing beams, as shown in the sections, Fig. 100, so that light enters the room right at the junction of the ceiling and the inner wall. Given the limited resources and basic methods of the Zuñi, this unique design often resulted in weak construction, and the openings, positioned so low in the wall, were at risk of letting in water from the roof. The challenge of getting enough light from this device was significantly reduced when the outer roof was somewhat lower than the ceiling inside.
208 These oblique openings occur not only in the larger clusters of houses Nos. 1 and 4, but also in the more openly planned portions of the village, though they do not occur either at Acoma or in the Tusayan villages. They afford an interesting example of the transfer and continuance in use of a constructional device developed in one place by unusual conditions to a new field in which it was uncalled for, being less efficient and more difficult of introduction than the devices in ordinary use.
208 These angled openings can be found not only in the larger groups of houses Nos. 1 and 4 but also in the more open areas of the village. However, they are absent in both Acoma and the Tusayan villages. They provide an interesting example of how a construction technique, developed in one location due to unique circumstances, was used in a new setting where it wasn't really needed. This technique is less effective and harder to implement than the more typical methods.
FURNITURE.
The pueblo Indian has little household furniture, in the sense in which the term is commonly employed; but his home contains certain features which are more or less closely embodied in the house construction and which answers the purpose. The suspended pole that serves as a clothes rack for ordinary wearing apparel, extra blankets, robes, etc., has already been described in treating of interiors. Religious costumes and ceremonial paraphernalia are more carefully provided for, and are stored away in some hidden corner of the dark storerooms.
The Pueblo Indian doesn’t have much household furniture in the typical sense of the term, but their home includes certain features that are integrated into the house's construction and serve their purpose well. The suspended pole used as a clothes rack for everyday clothes, extra blankets, robes, and so on has already been described when discussing interiors. Religious costumes and ceremonial items are given more careful attention and are stored away in a hidden corner of the dark storerooms.
The small wall niches, which are formed by closing a window with a thin filling-in wall, and which answer the purpose of cupboards or receptacles 209 for many of the smaller household articles, have also been described and illustrated in connection with the Zuñi interior (Pl. LXXXVI).
The small wall niches created by covering a window with a thin wall serve as cupboards or storage spaces for various small household items. These have also been described and shown related to the Zuñi interior (Pl. L86). 209
In many houses, both in Tusayan and in Cibola, shelves are constructed for the more convenient storage of food, etc. These are often constructed in a very primitive manner, particularly in the former province. An unusually frail example may be seen in Fig. 67, in connection with a fireplace. Fig. 101, showing a series of mealing stones in a Tusayan house, also illustrates a rude shelf in the corner of the room, supported at one end by an upright stone slab and at the other by a projecting wooden peg. Shelves made of sawed boards are occasionally seen, but as a rule such boards are considered too valuable to be used in this manner. A more common arrangement, particularly in Tusayan, is a combination of three or four slender poles placed side by side, 2 or 3 inches apart, forming a rude shelf, upon which trays of food are kept.
In many homes, both in Tusayan and Cibola, shelves are built for easier food storage, among other things. These are often made in a very simple way, especially in the former region. An especially delicate example can be seen in Fig. 67, next to a fireplace. Fig. 101, which shows a series of grinding stones in a Tusayan home, also displays a basic shelf in the corner of the room, supported on one end by a vertical stone slab and on the other by a sticking-out wooden peg. Shelves made from cut boards are sometimes found, but generally, such boards are seen as too precious to be used this way. A more common setup, especially in Tusayan, involves three or four thin poles placed side by side, 2 or 3 inches apart, making a rough shelf where trays of food are stored.
Fig. 101. Arrangement of mealing stones in a Tusayan house.
Fig. 101. Layout of grinding stones in a Tusayan home.
![]() |
Fig. 102. A Tusayan grain bin. |
Another device for the storage of food, occasionally seen in the pueblo house, is a pocket or bin built into the corner of a room. Fig. 101, illustrating the plan of a Tusayan house, indicates the position of one of these cupboard-like inclosures. A sketch of this specimen is shown in 210 Fig. 102. This bin, used for the storage of beans, grain, and the like, is formed by cutting off a corner of the room by setting two stone slabs into the floor, and it is covered with the mud plastering which extends over the neighboring walls.
Another way to store food, sometimes found in pueblo homes, is a pocket or bin built into the corner of a room. Fig. 101, showing the layout of a Tusayan house, marks the location of one of these cupboard-like spaces. A sketch of this example can be seen on 210 Fig. 102. This bin, used for storing beans, grain, and similar items, is created by cutting off a corner of the room with two stone slabs placed into the floor, and it's covered with the same mud plaster that covers the surrounding walls.
A curious modification of this device was seen in one of the inner rooms in Zuñi, in the house of José Pié. A large earthen jar, apparently an ordinary water vessel, was built into a projecting masonry bench near the corner of the room in such a manner that its rim projected less than half an inch above its surface. This jar was used for the same purpose as the Tusayan corner bin.
A fascinating variation of this device was found in one of the inner rooms in Zuñi, in José Pié's house. A large clay jar, which seemed like a regular water container, was set into a protruding masonry bench near the corner of the room, so that its rim stuck out less than half an inch above the surface. This jar was used for the same purpose as the Tusayan corner bin.
![]() |
Fig. 103. A Zuñi plume box. |
Some of the Indians of the present time have chests or boxes in which their ceremonial blankets and paraphernalia are kept. These of course have been introduced since the days of American boards and boxes. In Zuñi, however, the Indians still use a small wooden receptacle for the precious ceremonial articles, such as feathers and beads. This is an oblong box, provided with a countersunk lid, and usually carved from a single piece of wood. Typical specimens are illustrated in Figs. 103 and 104. The workmanship displayed in these objects is not beyond the aboriginal skill of the native workman, and their use is undoubtedly ancient.
Some of the Native Americans today have chests or boxes where they keep their ceremonial blankets and supplies. These have obviously been introduced since the times of American boards and boxes. However, in Zuñi, the Native Americans still use a small wooden container for their valuable ceremonial items, like feathers and beads. This is an oblong box with a recessed lid, usually carved from a single piece of wood. Typical examples are shown in Figs. 103 and 104. The craftsmanship in these items reflects the skill of the native artisan, and their use is definitely ancient.
Perhaps the most important article of furniture in the home of the pueblo Indian is the mealing trough, containing the household milling apparatus. This trough usually contains a series of three metates of varying degrees of coarseness firmly fixed in a slanting position most convenient for the workers. It consists of thin slabs of sandstone set into the floor on edge, similar slabs forming the separating partitions between the compartments. This arrangement is shown in Fig. 105, illustrating a Tusayan mealing trough. Those of Zuñi are of the same form, as maybe seen in the illustration of a Zuñi interior, Fig. 105. Occasionally in recently constructed specimens the thin inclosing walls of the trough are made of planks. In the example illustrated one end of the series is bounded by a board, all the other walls and divisions being made of the usual stone slabs. The metates themselves are not usually more than 3 inches in thickness. They are so adjusted in their setting of stones and mortar as to slope away from the operator at the proper angle. This arrangement of the mealing stones is characteristic of the more densely clustered communal houses of late date. In the more primitive house the mealing stone was usually a single large piece of cellular basalt, or similar rock, in which a broad, sloping depression was carved, and which could be transported from place to place. Fig. 106 illustrates an example of this type from the vicinity of Globe, in southern Arizona. The stationary mealing trough of the present day is undoubtedly the successor of the earner moveable form, yet it was in use among the pueblos at the time of the first Spanish expedition, as the following extract from Castañeda’s account9 of Cibola will show. He says a special room is designed to grind the grain: “This last is apart, and contains a furnace and three stones made fast in {no para} masonry. 212 Three women sit down before these stones; the first crushes the grain, the second brays it, and the third reduces it entirely to powder.” It will be seen how exactly this description fits both the arrangement and the use of this mill at the present time. The perfection of mechanical devices and the refinement of methods here exhibited would seem to be in advance of the achievement of this people in other directions.
Perhaps the most important piece of furniture in a Pueblo Indian home is the mealing trough, which holds the household grinding setup. This trough typically contains three metates of different coarseness, securely positioned at a slant that’s most convenient for the users. It’s made of thin sandstone slabs set upright in the floor, with similar slabs forming the dividers between the sections. This setup is shown in Fig. 105, which illustrates a Tusayan mealing trough. The Zuñi mealing troughs are the same shape, as seen in the illustration of a Zuñi interior, Fig. 105. Occasionally, in newer versions, the thin enclosing walls of the trough are made from planks. In the illustrated example, one end of the series is bounded by a board, while all other walls and sections are made of the usual stone slabs. The metates themselves are usually no more than 3 inches thick. They are arranged with stones and mortar to slope away from the operator at the right angle. This setup of the grinding stones is typical of the later communal houses, which are more densely clustered. In earlier homes, the grinding stone was typically a single large piece of cellular basalt or a similar rock, with a broad, sloping depression carved into it, making it portable. Fig. 106 illustrates an example of this type from the Globe area in southern Arizona. The stationary mealing trough we see today is definitely the successor of the earlier movable form; it was already in use among the pueblos at the time of the first Spanish expedition, as shown in the following extract from Castañeda’s account 9 of Cibola. He mentions a special room designed for grinding grain: “This last is apart, and contains a furnace and three stones securely placed in {no para} masonry. 212 Three women sit down before these stones; the first crushes the grain, the second grinds it, and the third reduces it completely to powder.” It’s clear how closely this description matches both the arrangement and use of this mill today. The sophistication of the mechanical devices and the refinement of methods shown here seem to be ahead of what this people have achieved in other areas.
Fig. 105. A Tusayan mealing trough.
Fig. 105. A Tusayan grinding bowl.
![]() |
Fig. 106.
An ancient pueblo form of metate. |
The grinding stones of the mealing apparatus are of correspondingly varying degrees of roughness; those of basalt or lava are used for the first crushing of the corn, and sandstone is used for the final grinding on the last metate of the series. By means of these primitive appliances the corn meal is as finely ground as our wheaten flour. The grinding stones now used are always flat, as shown in Fig. 105, and differ from those that were used with the early massive type of metate in being of cylindrical form.
The grinding stones of the milling equipment come in different levels of roughness; basalt or lava stones are used for the initial crushing of the corn, while sandstone is used for the final grinding on the last metate in the series. With these basic tools, the cornmeal is ground as finely as our wheat flour. The grinding stones used today are always flat, as shown in Fig. 105, and differ from those used with the earlier solid type of metate because they are cylindrical in shape.
One end of the series of milling troughs is usually built against the wall near the corner of the room. In some cases, where the room is quite narrow, the series extends across from wall to wall. Series comprising four mealing stones, sometimes seen in Zuñi, are very generally arranged in this manner. In all cases sufficient floor space is left behind the mills to accommodate the women who kneel at their work. Pl. LXXXVI illustrates an unusual arrangement, in which the fourth mealing stone is set at right angles to the other stones of the series.
One end of the line of milling troughs is usually built against the wall near the corner of the room. In some cases, where the room is quite narrow, the line extends across from wall to wall. Lines with four grinding stones, sometimes seen in Zuñi, are generally arranged this way. In all cases, there is enough floor space left behind the mills for the women who kneel to do their work. Pl. L86 illustrates a unique setup, where the fourth grinding stone is positioned at a right angle to the other stones in the line.
Mortars are in general use in Zuñi and Tusayan households. As a rule they are of considerable size, and made of the same material as the rougher mealing stones. They are employed for crushing and grinding the chile or red pepper that enters so largely into the food of the Zuñi, and whose use has extended to the Mexicans of the same region. These mortars have the ordinary circular depressions and are used with a round pestle or crusher, often of somewhat long, cylindrical form for convenience in handling.
Mortars are commonly used in Zuñi and Tusayan households. Typically, they are quite large and made from the same material as the rougher grinding stones. They are used for crushing and grinding the chile or red pepper that is a major part of Zuñi cuisine, and this practice has spread to the Mexicans in the same area. These mortars have standard circular indentations and are used with a round pestle or crusher, which is often somewhat long and cylindrical for easier handling.
Parts of the apparatus for indoor blanket weaving seen in some of the pueblo houses may be included under the heading of furniture. These consist of devices for the attachment of the movable parts of the loom, which need not be described in this connection. In some of the Tusayan houses may be seen examples of posts sunk in the floor provided with holes for the insertion of cords for attaching and tightening the warp, similar to those built into the kiva floors, illustrated in Fig. 31. No device of this kind was seen in Zuñi. A more primitive appliance for such work is seen in both groups of pueblos in an occasional stump of a beam or short pole projecting from the wall at varying heights. Ceiling beams are also used for stretching the warp both in blanket and belt weaving.
Some of the equipment for indoor blanket weaving found in certain pueblo houses can be classified as furniture. These include tools for connecting the movable parts of the loom, which don’t need to be detailed here. In some Tusayan houses, you can find posts set into the floor with holes for inserting cords to attach and tighten the warp, similar to those built into the kiva floors, shown in Fig. 31. No such device was found in Zuñi. A more basic tool for this kind of work is seen in both groups of pueblos, represented by occasional stumps of beams or short poles sticking out from the wall at different heights. Ceiling beams are also used for stretching the warp in both blanket and belt weaving.
The furnishings of a pueblo house do not include tables and chairs. The meals are eaten directly from the stone-paved floor, the participants rarely having any other seat than the blanket that they wear, rolled up or folded into convenient form. Small stools are sometimes seen, but 213 the need of such appliances does not seem to be keenly felt by these Indians, who can, for hours, sit in a peculiar squatting position on their haunches, without any apparent discomfort. Though moveable chairs or stools are rare, nearly all of the dwellings are provided with the low ledge or bench around the rooms, which in earlier times seems to have been confined to the kivas. A slight advance on this fixed form of seat was the stone block used in the Tusayan kivas, described on p. 132, which at the same time served a useful purpose in the adjustment of the warp threads for blanket weaving.
The furniture in a pueblo house doesn't include tables and chairs. Meals are eaten directly off the stone-paved floor, with most participants using their blankets, which they roll up or fold for convenience, as their only seating. Small stools sometimes appear, but 213 these Indians don't seem to need them much, as they can comfortably sit for hours in a unique squatting position on their haunches. Although moveable chairs or stools are uncommon, nearly all homes have a low ledge or bench around the rooms, which in the past was mainly seen in the kivas. A slight improvement on this fixed seating was the stone block used in the Tusayan kivas, described on p. 132, which also served a practical purpose in adjusting the warp threads for blanket weaving.
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 107. Zuñi stools. |
![]() |
Fig. 108. A Zuñi chair. |
The few wooden stools observed show very primitive workmanship, and are usually made of a single piece of wood. Fig. 107 illustrates two forms of wooden stool from Zuñi. The small three-legged stool on the left has been cut from the trunk of a piñon tree in such a manner as to utilize as legs the three branches into which the main stem separated. The other stool illustrated is also cut from a single piece of tree trunk, which has been reduced in weight by cutting out one side, leaving the two ends for support.
The few wooden stools seen have very basic craftsmanship and are usually made from a single piece of wood. Fig. 107 shows two types of wooden stools from Zuñi. The small three-legged stool on the left is carved from the trunk of a piñon tree, using three branches as legs where the main trunk splits. The other stool is also made from a single piece of tree trunk, but it has been made lighter by cutting out one side, leaving the two ends for support.
A curiously worked chair of modern form seen in Zuñi is illustrated in Fig. 108. It was difficult to determine the antiquity of this specimen, as its rickety condition may have been due to the clumsy workmanship quite as much as to the effects of age. Rude as is the workmanship, however, it was far beyond the unaided skill of the native craftsman to join and mortise the various pieces that go to make up this chair. Some decorative effect has been sought here, the ornamentation, made up of notches and sunken grooves, closely resembling that on the window sash illustrated in Fig. 88, and somewhat similar in effect to the carving on the Spanish beams seen in the Tusayan kivas. The whole construction strongly suggests Spanish influence.
A uniquely designed modern chair from Zuñi is shown in Fig. 108. It was challenging to figure out how old this piece is, as its shaky condition could be attributed to poor craftsmanship just as much as to its age. Despite the rough workmanship, it was still beyond the ability of the native craftsman to join and fit together the different parts that make up this chair. Some decorative elements have been incorporated, with ornamentation featuring notches and sunken grooves that closely resemble those on the window sash illustrated in Fig. 88, and are somewhat similar to the carvings on the Spanish beams found in the Tusayan kivas. The overall design strongly hints at Spanish influence.
214 Even the influence of Americans has as yet failed to bring about the use of tables or bedsteads among the pueblo Indians. The floor answers all the purposes of both these useful articles of furniture. The food dishes are placed directly upon it at meal times, and at night the blankets, rugs, and sheep skins that form the bed are spread directly upon it. These latter, during the day, are suspended upon the clothes pole previously described and illustrated.
214 The influence of Americans still hasn’t led to the adoption of tables or beds among the Pueblo Indians. The floor serves all the functions of both of these practical pieces of furniture. Food dishes are placed directly on it during meals, and at night, the blankets, rugs, and sheep skins that make up the bed are spread right on the floor. During the day, these items are hung on the clothes pole mentioned and shown earlier.
CORRALS AND GARDENS.
The introduction of domestic sheep among the pueblos has added a new and important element to their mode of living, but they seem never to have reached a clear understanding as to how these animals should be cared for. No forethought is exercised to separate the rams so that the lambs will be born at a favorable season. The flocks consist of sheep and goats which are allowed to run together at all tunes. Black sheep and some with a grayish color of wool are often seen among them. No attempt is made to eliminate these dark-fleeced members of the flock, since the black and gray wool is utilized in its natural color in producing many of the designs and patterns of the blankets woven by these people. The flocks are usually driven up into the corrals or inclosures every evening, and are taken out again in the morning, frequently at quite a late hour. This, together with the time consumed in driving them to and from pasture, gives them much less chance to thrive than those of the nomadic Navajo. In Tusayan the corrals are usually of small size and inclosed by thin walls of rude stone work. This may be seen in the foreground of Pl. XXI. Pl. CIX illustrates several corrals just outside the village of Mashongnavi similarly constructed, but of somewhat larger size. Some of the corrals of Oraibi are of still larger size, approaching in this respect the corrals of Cibola. The Oraibi pens are rudely rectangular in form, with more or less rounded angles, and are also built of rude masonry.
The introduction of domestic sheep among the pueblos has added a new and important aspect to their way of life, but they don't seem to have figured out how to properly care for these animals. There's no planning to keep the rams separate so that the lambs are born at a good time. The flocks consist of sheep and goats that are allowed to mingle all the time. Black sheep and some with grayish wool are often seen among them. No effort is made to remove these dark-fleeced members, since the black and gray wool is used as-is to create many of the designs and patterns of the blankets woven by these people. The flocks are usually herded into pens or enclosures every evening and let out again in the morning, often at quite a late hour. This, along with the time spent moving them to and from pasture, gives them much less opportunity to thrive compared to the nomadic Navajo. In Tusayan, the corrals are typically small and surrounded by thin stone walls. This can be seen in the foreground of Pl. XXI. Pl. CIX shows several corrals just outside the village of Mashongnavi, which are similarly built but somewhat larger. Some of the corrals in Oraibi are even larger, nearing the size of those in Cibola. The pens in Oraibi are roughly rectangular, with more or less rounded corners, and are also made of crude masonry.
Plate CIX. Stone corrals and kiva of Mashongnavi.
Plate CIX. Stone pens and kiva of Mashongnavi.
In the less important villages of Cibola stone is occasionally used for inclosing the corrals, as in Tusayan, as may be seen in Pl. LXX, illustrating an inclosure of this character in the court of the farming pueblo of Pescado. Pl. CX illustrates in detail the manner in which stone work is combined with the use of rude stakes in the construction of this inclosure. On the rugged sites of the Tusayan villages corrals are placed wherever favorable nooks happen to be found in the rocks, but at Zuñi, built in the comparatively open plain, they form a nearly continuous belt around the pueblo. Here they are made of stakes and brush held in place by horizontal poles tied on with strips of rawhide. The rudely contrived gateways are supported in natural forks at the top and sides of posts. Often one or two small inclosures used for burros or horses occur near these sheep corrals. The construction is identical with those above described and is very rude. It is illustrated in Fig. 109, which shows the manner in which the stakes are arranged, and also 215 the method of attaching the horizontal tie-pieces. The construction of these inclosures is frail, and the danger of pushing the stakes over by pressure from within is guarded against by employing forked braces that abut against horizontal pieces tied on 4 or 5 feet from the ground. Reference to Pl. LXXIV will illustrate this construction.
In the less prominent villages of Cibola, stone is sometimes used to enclose corrals, similar to what you see in Tusayan, as shown in Pl. LXX, which depicts such an enclosure in the courtyard of the farming pueblo of Pescado. Pl. CX shows in detail how stonework is combined with rough stakes for building this enclosure. In the rocky areas of the Tusayan villages, corrals are situated wherever favorable nooks in the rocks can be found, but at Zuñi, located in a relatively open plain, they create a nearly continuous belt around the pueblo. Here, they are made of stakes and brush supported by horizontal poles tied with strips of rawhide. The simply constructed gateways are held up by natural forks at the tops and sides of the posts. Often, one or two small enclosures for burros or horses are found near these sheep corrals. The construction is the same as described above and is quite rudimentary. This is illustrated in Fig. 109, which shows how the stakes are arranged, and also 215 how the horizontal tie-pieces are attached. The construction of these enclosures is weak, and to prevent the stakes from being pushed over by pressure from within, forked braces are used that rest against horizontal pieces tied 4 or 5 feet off the ground. Reference to Pl. L74 will illustrate this construction.
Plate CX. Portion of a corral in Pescado.
Plate CX. Part of a corral in Pescado.
Within the village of Zuñi inclosures resembling miniature corrals are sometimes seen built against the houses; these are used as cages for eagles. A number of these birds are kept in Zuñi for the sake of their plumage, which is highly valued for ceremonial purposes. Pl. CXI illustrates one of these coops, constructed partly with a thin adobe wall and partly with stakes arranged like those of the corrals.
Within the village of Zuñi, you can sometimes see small enclosures that look like tiny corrals built against the houses; these serve as cages for eagles. Several of these birds are kept in Zuñi for their feathers, which are highly prized for ceremonial uses. Pl. CXI shows one of these coops, made partly with a thin adobe wall and partly with stakes set up like those in the corrals.
Fig. 109. Construction of a Zuñi corral.
Building a Zuni corral.
In both of the pueblo groups under discussion, small gardens contiguous to the villages are frequent. Those of Tusayan are walled in with stone.
In both of the pueblo groups being discussed, small gardens next to the villages are common. The ones in Tusayan are enclosed with stone walls.
Within the pueblo of Zuñi a small group of garden patches is inclosed by stake fences, but the majority of the gardens in the vicinity of the 216 principal villages are provided with low walls of mud masonry. The small terraced gardens here are near the river bank on the southwest and southeast sides of the village. The inclosed spaces, averaging in size about 10 feet square, are used for the cultivation of red peppers, beans, etc., which, during the dry season, are watered by hand. These inclosures, situated close to the dwellings, suggest a probable explanation for similar inclosures found in many of the ruins in the southern and eastern portions of the ancient pueblo region. Mr. Bandelier was informed by the Pimas10 that these inclosures were ancient gardens. He concluded that since acequias were frequent in the immediate vicinity these gardens must have been used as reserves in case of war, when the larger fields were not available, but the manner of their occurrence in Zuñi suggests rather that they were intended for cultivation of special crops, such as pepper, beans, cotton, and perhaps also of a variety of 217 tobacco—corn, melons, squashes, etc., being cultivated elsewhere in larger tracts. There is a large group of gardens on the bank of the stream at the southeastern corner of Zuñi, and here there are slight indications of terracing. A second group on the steeper slope at the southwestern corner is distinctly terraced. Small walled gardens of the same type as these Zuñi examples occur in the vicinity of some of the Tusayan villages on the middle mesa. They are located near the springs or water pockets, apparently to facilitate watering by hand. Some of them contain a few small peach trees in addition to the vegetable crops ordinarily met with. The clusters here are, as a rule, smaller than those of Zuñi, as there is much less space available in the vicinity of the springs. At one point on the west side of the first mesa, a few miles above Walpi, a copious spring serves to irrigate quite an extensive series of small garden patches distributed over lower slopes.
Within the Zuñi community, a small group of garden plots is surrounded by stake fences, but most of the gardens near the principal villages have low mud walls. The small terraced gardens are situated near the riverbank on the southwest and southeast sides of the village. These enclosed areas, averaging about 10 feet square, are used to grow red peppers, beans, and other crops, which are hand-watered during the dry season. The proximity of these enclosures to the homes hints at a possible explanation for similar structures found in many ruins across the southern and eastern parts of the ancient pueblo region. Mr. Bandelier was informed by the Pimas that these enclosures were ancient gardens. He concluded that since acequias were common in the area, these gardens must have served as reserves in times of war, when larger fields were not accessible. However, the way they are organized in Zuñi suggests they were meant for growing specific crops like peppers, beans, cotton, and perhaps different types of tobacco, with corn, melons, and squashes cultivated in larger tracts elsewhere. There's a substantial group of gardens along the stream at the southeastern corner of Zuñi, with slight indications of terracing. A second group on the steeper slope at the southwestern corner is clearly terraced. Smaller walled gardens similar to those in Zuñi can also be found near some of the Tusayan villages on the middle mesa, located near springs or water pockets to make hand-watering easier. Some of these gardens have a few small peach trees in addition to the usual vegetable crops. Generally, these clusters are smaller than those in Zuñi due to the limited space around the springs. At one point on the west side of the first mesa, a few miles above Walpi, there’s a plentiful spring providing irrigation for an extensive series of small garden patches spread across the lower slopes.
Plate CXI. Zuñi eagle-cage.
Plate CXI. Zuñi eagle cage.
At several points around Zuñi, usually at a greater distance than the terrace gardens, are fields of much larger area inclosed in a similar manner. Their inclosure was simply to secure them against the depredations of stray burros, so numerous about the village. When the crops are gathered in the autumn, several breaches are made in the low wall and the burros are allowed to luxuriate on the remains. Pl. LIX indicates the position of the large cluster of garden patches on the southeastern side of Zuñi. Fig. 110, taken from photographs made in 1873, shows several of these small gardens with their growing crops and a large field of corn beyond. The workmanship of the garden walls as contrasted with that of the house masonry has been already described and is illustrated in Pl. XC.
At several spots around Zuñi, usually farther away than the terrace gardens, there are fields encompassing a much larger area that are enclosed in a similar way. The enclosure was simply to protect them from the many stray donkeys that roam around the village. When the crops are harvested in the autumn, several breaks are made in the low wall, and the donkeys are allowed to feast on the leftovers. Pl. LIX marks the location of the large cluster of garden patches on the southeastern side of Zuñi. Fig. 110, taken from photos shot in 1873, shows several of these small gardens with their crops and a large cornfield in the background. The quality of the garden walls compared to that of the house masonry has already been described and is illustrated in Pl. XC.
Fig. 110. Gardens of Zuñi.
Gardens of Zuni.
“KISI” CONSTRUCTION.
Lightly constructed shelters for the use of those in charge of fields were probably a constant accompaniment of pueblo horticulture. Such shelters were built of stone or of brush, according to which material was most available.
Lightly built shelters for the people overseeing the fields were likely always present alongside pueblo farming. These shelters were made from stone or brush, depending on which material was more accessible.
In very precipitous localities, as the Canyon de Chelly, these outlooks naturally became the so-called cliff-dwellings or isolated shelters. In Cibola single stone houses are in common use, not to the exclusion, however, of the lighter structures of brush, while in Tusayan these lighter forms, of which there are a number of well defined varieties, are almost exclusively used. A detailed study of the methods of construction employed in these rude shelters would be of great interest as affording a comparison both with the building methods of the ruder neighboring tribes and with those adopted in constructing some of the details of the terraced house; the writer, however, did not have an opportunity of making an examination of all the field shelters used in these pueblos. Two of the simpler types are the “tuwahlki,” or watch house, and the “kishoni,” or uncovered shade. The former is constructed by first 218 planting a short forked stick in the ground, which supports one end of a pole, the other end resting on the ground. The interval between this ridge pole and the ground is roughly filled in with slanting sticks and brush, the inclosed space being not more than 3 feet in height, with a maximum width of four or five feet. These shelters are for the accommodation of the children who watch the melon patches until the fruit is harvested.
In very steep areas, like Canyon de Chelly, these spots naturally turned into what we now call cliff dwellings or isolated shelters. In Cibola, single stone houses are commonly used, although lighter structures made of brush are also present. In Tusayan, lighter buildings, which come in various distinct types, are used almost exclusively. A thorough study of the construction methods used in these basic shelters would be very interesting, as it would allow for a comparison with the building techniques of the more primitive nearby tribes and with those used in some aspects of the terraced house; however, the author didn't have the chance to examine all the field shelters used in these pueblos. Two of the simpler types are the “tuwahlki,” or watch house, and the “kishoni,” or open shade. The former is built by first planting a short forked stick in the ground, which holds one end of a pole, while the other end rests on the ground. The space between this ridge pole and the ground is roughly filled with slanting sticks and brush, creating an enclosed area that is no more than 3 feet high and a maximum of four or five feet wide. These shelters are meant for the children who watch over the melon patches until the fruit is ready to be harvested.
Fig. 111. Kishoni, or uncovered shade, of Tusayan.
Fig. 111. Kishoni, or open shade, of Tusayan.
The kishoni, or uncovered shade, illustrated in Fig. 111, is perhaps the simplest form of shelter employed. Ten or a dozen cottonwood saplings are set firmly into the ground, so as to form a slightly curved inclosure with convex side toward the south. Cottonwood and willow boughs in foliage, grease-wood, sage brush, and rabbit brush are laid with stems upward in even rows against these saplings to a height of 6 or 7 feet. This light material is held in place by bands of small cottonwood branches laid in continuous horizontal lines around the outside of the shelter and these are attached to the upright saplings with cottonwood and willow twigs.
The kishoni, or open shade, shown in Fig. 111, is probably the simplest type of shelter used. Ten or twelve cottonwood saplings are planted firmly in the ground to create a slightly curved enclosure with the rounded side facing south. Cottonwood and willow branches with leaves, greasewood, sagebrush, and rabbit brush are placed with the stems up in even rows against these saplings to a height of 6 or 7 feet. This lightweight material is secured by bands of small cottonwood branches laid in continuous horizontal lines around the outside of the shelter, which are fastened to the upright saplings with cottonwood and willow twigs.
Fig. 112. A Tusayan field shelter, from southwest.
Fig. 112. A Tusayan field shelter, viewed from the southwest.
219 Figs. 112 and 113 illustrate a much more elaborate field shelter in Tusayan. As may readily be seen from the figures this shelter covers a considerable area; it will be seen too that the upright branches that inclose two of its sides are of sufficient height to considerably shade the level roof of poles and brush, converting it into a comfortable retreat.
219 Figs. 112 and 113 show a more intricate field shelter in Tusayan. As you can see from the figures, this shelter takes up a large area; it’s also clear that the upright branches surrounding two sides are tall enough to provide significant shade for the flat roof made of poles and brush, turning it into a cozy hideaway.
Fig. 113. A Tusayan field shelter, from northeast.
Fig. 113. A Tusayan field shelter, viewed from the northeast.
ARCHITECTURAL NOMENCLATURE.
The following nomenclature, collected by Mr. Stephen, comprises the terms commonly used in designating the constructional details of Tusayan houses and kivas:
The following terminology, gathered by Mr. Stephen, includes the terms often used to refer to the construction details of Tusayan houses and kivas:
Le´stabi | The main roof timbers. The primary roof beams. |
Wina´kwapi | The smaller cross poles. The shorter cross poles. |
Kaha´b kwapi | The willow covering. The willow canopy. |
Süibi kwapi | The brush covering. The brush cover. |
Si´hü kwapi | The grass covering. The grass layer. |
Tcuka´tcve wata | The dry earth layer of the roof. The dry layer of soil on the roof. |
Kiam´ba´lawi | The layer of mud plaster on the roof. The layer of mud plaster on the roof. |
Kiami | An entire roof. A whole roof. |
Tüpat´caiata, lestabi Lesta´bkwapi, |
Both of these terms are used to designate the kiva hatchway beams upon which the hatchway walls rest. Both of these terms are used to refer to the kiva hatchway beams that support the hatchway walls. |
Süna´cabi le´stabi | The main beams in the roof, nearest to the hatchway. The main roof beams, closest to the hatchway. |
Ĕp´eoka le´stabi | The main beams next to the central ones. The main beams are next to the central ones. |
Püep´eoka le´stabi | The main beams next in order, and all the beams intervening between the “epeoka” and the end beams are so designated. The main beams come next, and all the beams in between the “epeoka” and the end beams are referred to as such. |
Kala´beoka lestabi | The beams at the ends of a kiva. The beams at the ends of a kiva. |
Mata´owa | “Stone placed with hands.” “Stone positioned by hand.” |
Hüzrüowa | “Hard stone.” “Hard rock.” Both of these latter terms are applied to corner foundation stones. Both of these terms refer to corner foundation stones. |
Kwa´kü üt´cpi | |
Tüpat´caiata | |
Tüpat´caiata tü´kwa | The walls of the hatchway. The walls of the entrance. |
Kipat´ctjua´ta | |
Apa´pho´ya | Small niches in the wall. “Apap,” from “apabi,” inside, and “hoya,” small. Small niches in the wall. “Apap,” from “apabi,” inside, and “hoya,” small. |
Si´papüh | An archaic term. The etymology of this word is not known. An outdated term. The origin of this word is not known. |
Kwŏp´kota | The fireplace. “Kwuhi,” coals or embers; “küaiti,” head. The fireplace. “Kwuhi,” coals or embers; “küaiti,” head. |
Kŏi´tci | |
Kokü´ina | Pegs in the walls. Wall pegs. |
Sa´ka | A ladder. This term is applied to any ladder. Figs. 45-47. A ladder. This term refers to any type of ladder. Figs. 45-47. |
Sa´kaleta | Ladder rungs; “Leta,” from “lestabi;” see above. Ladder rungs; “Leta,” from “lestabi;” see above. |
Tüvwibi | |
Tüvwi | Stone ledges around the sides, for seats. The same term is used to designate any ledge, as that of a mesa, etc. Stone ledges around the sides serve as seats. The same term is used to refer to any ledge, like that of a mesa, and so on. |
Katcin´ Kibü | “Katcina,” house. The niche in a ledge at the end of the kiva. “Katcina,” house. The alcove in a ledge at the end of the kiva. |
Kwi´sa | The planks set into the floor, to which the lower beam of a blanket loom is fastened. The wooden boards embedded in the floor, to which the lower beam of a blanket loom is attached. |
Kaintup´ha | Terms applied to the main floor; they both mean “the large space.” Terms applied to the main floor; they both mean "the big space." |
Kiva´kani | |
Tapü´wü´tci | Hewn planks a foot wide and 6 to 8 feet long, set into the floor. Hewn planks that are a foot wide and 6 to 8 feet long, installed in the floor. |
Wina´wü´tci | A plank. A board. |
Owa´pühü´imiata | “Stone spread out;” the flagged floor; also designates the slabs covering the hatchway. “Stone spread out;” the paved floor; also refers to the slabs covering the hatchway. |
223 Yau´wiopi. |
Fig. 114. Diagram showing ideal section of terraces, with Tusayan names.
Fig. 114. Diagram showing the ideal section of terraces, with Tusayan names.
The accompanying diagram is an ideal section of a Tusayan four-story house, and gives the native names for the various rooms and terraces.
The diagram below is a perfect representation of a four-story house from Tusayan, showing the native names for the different rooms and terraces.
CONCLUDING REMARKS.
The modern villages of Tusayan and Cibola differ more widely in arrangement and in the relation they bear to the surrounding topography than did their predecessors even of historic times.
The modern villages of Tusayan and Cibola are significantly different in layout and how they relate to the surrounding landscape compared to their historic predecessors.
Many of the older pueblos of both groups appear to have belonged to the valley types—villages of considerable size, located in open plains or on the slopes of low-lying foothills. A comparison of the plans in Chapters II and III will illustrate these differences. In Tusayan the necessity of defense has driven the builders to inaccessible sites, so that now all the occupied villages of the province are found on mesa summits. The inhabitants of the valley pueblos of Cibola, although compelled at one time to build their houses upon the almost inaccessible summit of Tâaaiyalana mesa, occupied this site only temporarily, and soon established a large valley pueblo, the size and large population of which afforded that defensive efficiency which the Tusayan obtained only by building on mesa promontories. This has resulted in some adherence on the part of the Tusayan to the village plans of their ancestors, while at Zuni the great house clusters, forming the largest pueblo occupied in modern times, show a wide departure from the primitive types. In both provinces the architecture is distinguished from that of other portions of the pueblo region by greater irregularity of 224 plan and by less skillfully executed constructional details; each group, however, happens to contain a notable exception to this general carelessness.
Many of the older pueblos from both groups seem to have belonged to the valley types—larger villages situated in open plains or on the gentle slopes of low hills. A comparison of the plans in Chapters II and III will highlight these differences. In Tusayan, the need for defense has led builders to choose hard-to-reach locations, so now all the occupied villages in the area are found on mesa tops. The residents of the valley pueblos in Cibola, although once forced to build their homes on the nearly inaccessible summit of Tâaaiyalana mesa, only lived there temporarily and soon created a large valley pueblo. Its size and significant population provided the defensive advantage that the Tusayan achieved only by constructing their villages on mesa promontories. As a result, the Tusayan have somewhat stuck to the village layouts of their ancestors, while at Zuni, the large house clusters that make up the biggest pueblo occupied today show a significant departure from primitive designs. In both areas, the architecture stands out from that of other parts of the pueblo region due to its greater irregularity in layout and less skillfully executed construction details; however, each group does include a notable exception to this general lack of care.
In Cibola the pueblo of Kin-tiel, built with a continuous defensive outer wall, occupies architecturally a somewhat anomalous position, notwithstanding its traditional connection with the group, and the Fire House occupies much the same relation in reference to Tusayan. The latter, however, does not break in upon the unity of the group, since the Tusayan, to a much greater extent than the Zuñi, are made up of remnants of various bands of builders. In Cibola, however, some of the Indians state that their ancestors, before reaching Zuñi, built a number of pueblos, whose ruins are distinguished from those illustrated in the present paper by the presence of circular kivas, this form of ceremonial room being, apparently, wholly absent from the Cibolan pueblos here discussed.
In Cibola, the pueblo of Kin-tiel, with its continuous defensive outer wall, has a unique architectural position, even though it has a traditional link to the group. The Fire House has a similar relation to Tusayan. However, the latter doesn't disrupt the unity of the group, since the Tusayan consists much more of remnants from different groups of builders than the Zuñi. In Cibola, some of the Indians say that their ancestors built several pueblos before arriving at Zuñi, and the ruins of these pueblos can be identified by the presence of circular kivas, a type of ceremonial room that seems to be completely missing from the Cibolan pueblos discussed here.
The people of Cibola and of Tusayan belong to distinct linguistic stocks, but their arts are very closely related, the differences being no greater than would result from the slightly different conditions that have operated within the last few generations. Zuñi, perhaps, came more directly under early Spanish influence than Tusayan.
The people of Cibola and Tusayan speak different languages, but their art forms are quite similar, with differences that are minimal and mostly due to the slightly different conditions they've experienced over the past few generations. Zuñi, in particular, seems to have been more directly influenced by early Spanish contact than Tusayan.
Churches were established, as has been seen, in both provinces, but it is doubtful whether their presence produced any lasting impression on the people. In Tusayan the sway of the Spaniards was very brief. At some of the pueblos the churches seem to have been built outside of the village proper where ample space was available within the pueblo; but such an encroachment on the original inclosed courts seems never to have been attempted. Zuñi is an apparent exception; but all the house clusters east of the church have probably been built later than the church itself, the church court of the present village being a much larger area than would be reserved for the usual pueblo court. These early churches were, as a rule, built of adobe, even when occurring in stone pueblos. The only exception noticed is at Ketchipauan, where it was built of the characteristic Indian smoothly chinked masonry. The Spaniards usually intruded their own construction, even to the composition of the bricks, which are nearly always made of straw adobe.
Churches were set up, as noted, in both provinces, but it's questionable if their presence made any lasting impact on the people. In Tusayan, Spanish control was very short-lived. In some of the pueblos, the churches appear to have been built outside the main village where there was more space available inside the pueblo; however, it seems that encroaching on the original enclosed courtyards was never attempted. Zuñi seems to be an exception, but all the house clusters to the east of the church were probably constructed after the church itself, with the church courtyard in the current village being a much larger area than what would typically be set aside for a pueblo courtyard. These early churches were generally made of adobe, even when found in stone pueblos. The only exception noted is at Ketchipauan, where it was constructed of the traditional Indian smoothly chinked masonry. The Spaniards usually imposed their own building techniques, even in the composition of the bricks, which are almost always made of straw adobe.
At Tusayan there is no evidence that a church or mission house ever formed part of the villages on the mesa summits. Their plans are complete in themselves, and probably represent closely the first pueblos built on these sites. These summits have been extensively occupied only in comparatively recent times, although one or more small clusters may have been built here at an early date as outlooks over the fields in the valleys below.
At Tusayan, there’s no sign that a church or mission house was ever part of the villages on the mesa tops. Their designs are entirely self-sufficient and likely closely resemble the first pueblos constructed at these locations. These summits have only been heavily populated in relatively recent times, although one or more small groups may have been established here earlier as viewing points over the fields in the valleys below.
It is to be noted that some of the ruins connected traditionally and historically with Tusayan and Cibola differ in no particular from stone pueblos widely scattered over the southwestern plateaus which have been from time to time invested with a halo of romantic antiquity, and 225 regarded as remarkable achievements in civilization by a vanished but once powerful race. These deserted stone houses, occurring in the midst of desert solitudes, appealed strongly to the imaginations of early explorers, and their stimulated fancy connected the remains with “Aztecs” and other mysterious peoples. That this early implanted bias has caused the invention of many ingenious theories concerning the origin and disappearance of the builders of the ancient pueblos, is amply attested in the conclusions reached by many of the writers on this subject.
It’s important to note that some of the ruins traditionally and historically associated with Tusayan and Cibola are essentially the same as the stone pueblos scattered across the southwestern plateaus. These locations have occasionally been wrapped in a sense of romantic history and viewed as remarkable achievements of civilization by a once-powerful but now-gone race. These abandoned stone houses, located in the middle of desert solitude, strongly captured the imaginations of early explorers. Their fanciful ideas linked the ruins to “Aztecs” and other mysterious groups. This early bias has led to the creation of many clever theories about the origin and disappearance of those who built the ancient pueblos, as confirmed by the conclusions drawn by many writers on the topic. 225
In connection with the architectural examination of some of these remains many traditions have been obtained from the present tribes, clearly indicating that some of the village ruins, and even cliff dwellings, have been built and occupied by ancestors of the present Pueblo Indians, sometimes at a date well within the historic period.
In relation to the architectural study of some of these remains, many traditions have been gathered from the current tribes, clearly showing that some of the village ruins, and even cliff dwellings, were built and lived in by the ancestors of today's Pueblo Indians, sometimes dating back to a time well within the historic period.
The migrations of the Tusayan clans, as described in the legends collected by Mr. Stephen, were slow and tedious. While they pursued their wanderings and awaited the favorable omens of the gods they halted many times and planted. They speak traditionally of stopping at certain places on their routes during a certain number of “plantings,” always building the characteristic stone pueblos and then again taking up the march.
The migrations of the Tusayan clans, as described in the legends collected by Mr. Stephen, were slow and exhausting. As they traveled and waited for good signs from the gods, they stopped many times to plant. They traditionally talk about pausing at specific spots along their journey for a certain number of “plantings,” always constructing their distinctive stone pueblos before continuing their journey.
When these Indians are questioned as to whence they came, their replies are various and conflicting; but this is due to the fact that the members of one clan came, after a long series of wanderings, from the north, for instance, while those of other gentes may have come last from the east. The tribe to-day seems to be made up of a collection or a confederacy of many enfeebled remnants of independent phratries and groups once more numerous and powerful. Some clans traditionally referred to as having been important are now represented by few survivors, and bid fair soon to become extinct. So the members of each phratry have their own store of traditions, relating to the wanderings of their own ancestors, which differ from those of other clans, and refer to villages successively built and occupied by them. In the case of others of the pueblos, the occupation of cliff dwellings and cave lodges is known to have occurred within historic times.
When these Native Americans are asked where they come from, their answers vary and contradict each other. This is because members of one clan might have come from the north after wandering for a long time, while members of other groups may have last come from the east. The tribe today appears to be a mix or a confederation of many weakened remnants of once larger and more powerful groups. Some clans that were historically significant now have very few surviving members and seem likely to become extinct soon. Each group has its own set of traditions about the journeys of their ancestors, which are different from those of other clans, and they talk about the villages they built and lived in over time. In the case of other pueblos, the use of cliff dwellings and cave lodges is known to have happened during historic times.
Both architectural and traditional evidence are in accord in establishing a continuity of descent from the ancient Pueblos to those of the present day. Many of the communities are now made up of the more or less scattered but interrelated remnants of gentes which in former times occupied villages, the remains of which are to-day looked upon as the early homes of “Aztec colonies,” etc.
Both architectural and traditional evidence agree on establishing a continuous lineage from the ancient Pueblos to today's communities. Many of these communities are now made up of the scattered but connected remnants of groups that once inhabited villages, the remains of which are now considered the early homes of "Aztec colonies," etc.
The adaptation, of this architecture to the peculiar environment indicates that it has long been practiced under the same conditions that now prevail. Nearly all of the ancient pueblos were built of the sandstone found in natural quarries at the bases of hundreds of cliffs throughout these table-lands. This stone readily breaks into small pieces of regular 226 form, suitable for use in the simple masonry of the pueblos without receiving any artificial treatment. The walls themselves give an exaggerated idea of finish, owing to the care and neatness with which the component stones are placed. Some of the illustrations in the last chapter, from photographs, show clearly that the material of the walls was much ruder than the appearance of the finished masonry would suggest, and that this finish depended on the careful selection and arrangement of the fragments. This is even more noticeable in the Chaco ruins, in which the walls were wrought to a high degrees of surface finish. The core of the wall was laid up with the larger and more irregular stones, and was afterwards brought to a smooth face by carefully filling in and chinking the joints with smaller stones and fragments, sometimes not more than a quarter of an inch thick; this method is still roughly followed by both Tusayan and Cibolan builders.
The adaptation of this architecture to the unique environment shows that it has been developed under the same conditions that exist today. Almost all of the ancient pueblos were made from the sandstone found in natural quarries at the bases of countless cliffs throughout these plateaus. This stone easily breaks into small, uniform pieces suitable for the simple masonry of the pueblos without needing any artificial treatment. The walls themselves appear very polished, thanks to the careful and neat way the individual stones are arranged. Some of the pictures in the last chapter clearly illustrate that the material of the walls was much rougher than the finished masonry suggests, and that this polished look relied on the careful selection and positioning of the fragments. This is even more evident in the Chaco ruins, where the walls were finished to a high degree of smoothness. The core of the wall was built with larger, more irregular stones and was then smoothed out by carefully filling in and sealing the gaps with smaller stones and fragments, sometimes just a quarter of an inch thick; this method is still generally used by both Tusayan and Cibolan builders.
Although many details of construction and arrangement display remarkable adaptation to the physical character of the country, yet the influence of such environment would not alone suffice to produce this architectural type. In order to develop the results found, another element was necessary. This element was the necessity for defense. The pueblo population was probably subjected to the more or less continuous influence of this defensive motive throughout the period of their occupation of this territory. A strong independent race of people, who had to fear no invasion by stronger foes, would necessarily have been influenced more by the physical environment and would have progressed further in the art of building, but the motive for building rectangular rooms—the initial point of departure in the development of pueblo architecture—would not have been brought into action. The crowding of many habitations upon a small cliff ledge or other restricted site, resulting in the rectangular form of rooms, was most likely due to the conditions imposed by this necessity for defense.
Although many details of construction and layout show a remarkable adaptation to the local geography, the environment alone wouldn’t have been enough to create this architectural style. To achieve the results seen, another factor was necessary. This factor was the need for defense. The pueblo population likely experienced the ongoing influence of this defensive need throughout their time in this area. A strong, independent group that didn’t have to worry about attacks from more powerful enemies would have been influenced more by the physical environment and would have advanced further in building techniques, but the reason for creating rectangular rooms—the starting point in the evolution of pueblo architecture—would not have come into play. The clustering of many homes on a small cliff ledge or other limited spaces, resulting in the rectangular shape of rooms, was probably a result of the need for defense.
The general outlines of the development of this architecture wherein the ancient builders were stimulated to the best use of the exceptional materials about them, both by the difficult conditions of their semi-desert environment and by constant necessity for protection against their neighbors, can be traced in its various stages of growth from the primitive conical lodge to its culmination in the large communal village of many-storied terraced buildings which we find to have been in use at the time of the Spanish discovery, and which still survives in Zuñi, perhaps its most striking modern example. Yet the various steps have resulted from a simple and direct use of the material immediately at hand, while methods gradually improved as frequent experiments taught the builders more fully to utilize local facilities. In all cases the material was derived from the nearest available source, and often variations in the quality of the finished work are due to variations in the quality of the stone near by. The results accomplished attest the patient and persistent industry of the ancient builders, but the work does not display great skill in construction or in preparation of material. 227 The same desert environment that furnished such an abundance of material for the ancient builders, also, from its difficult and inhospitable character and the constant variations in the water supply, compelled the frequent employment of this material. This was an important factor in bringing about the attained degree of advancement in the building art. At the present day constant local changes occur in the water sources of these arid table-lands, while the general character of the climate remains unaltered.
The overall development of this architecture, where ancient builders made the most of the exceptional materials around them—driven by the tough conditions of their semi-desert environment and the constant need for protection against neighboring tribes—can be seen in the various stages of growth. This ranges from the primitive conical lodge to the large communal village filled with multi-story terraced buildings that existed at the time of the Spanish discovery, and which still exists in Zuñi, one of its most striking modern examples. Each stage came from a straightforward and direct use of the materials available nearby, while methods gradually improved as builders learned to better utilize local resources through frequent experimentation. In every case, materials were sourced from the closest available locations, and often the differences in the quality of the final work are a result of the variability in the quality of local stone. The accomplishments highlight the patient and persistent efforts of the ancient builders, but the construction and material preparation do not show a high level of skill. 227 The same desert environment that provided plentiful materials for the ancient builders also challenged them with its harsh and unstable conditions and frequent changes in water supply, leading to the regular use of these materials. This was a crucial factor in achieving the level of advancement in building techniques. Today, there are continuous local changes in the water sources of these arid tablelands, while the overall climate remains unchanged.
The distinguishing characteristics of Pueblo architecture may be regarded as the product of a defensive motive and of an arid environment that furnished an abundance of suitable building material, and at the same time the climatic conditions that compelled its frequent employment.
The unique features of Pueblo architecture can be seen as the result of a need for defense and a dry environment that provided plenty of suitable building materials, along with the weather conditions that required its regular use.
The decline of the defensive motive within the last few years has greatly affected the more recent architecture. Even after the long practice of the system has rendered it somewhat fixed, comparative security from attack has caused many of the Pueblo Indians to recognize the inconvenience of dwellings grouped in large clusters on sites difficult of access, while the sources of their subsistence are necessarily sparsely scattered over large areas. This is noticeable in the building of small, detached houses at a distance from the main villages, the greater convenience to crops, flocks and water outweighing the defensive motive. In Cibola particularly, a marked tendency in this direction has shown itself within a score of years; Ojo Caliente, the newest of the farming pueblos, is perhaps the most striking example within the two provinces. The greater security of the pueblos as the country comes more fully into the hands of Americans, has also resulted in the more careless construction in modern examples as compared with the ancient.
The decline of the need for defense in recent years has significantly impacted contemporary architecture. Even though the system has become somewhat established over time, the improved safety from attacks has led many Pueblo Indians to see the drawbacks of living in large, clustered dwellings located in hard-to-reach areas, especially since their sources of food are often spread out over vast territories. This shift is evident in the construction of small, standalone houses further away from the main villages, where the benefits for crops, livestock, and access to water now outweigh the need for defense. In Cibola especially, a clear trend in this direction has emerged within the last twenty years; Ojo Caliente, the newest farming pueblo, stands out as a prime example in both provinces. The increased safety of the pueblos as more land comes under American control has also led to more careless building practices in modern constructions compared to the ancient ones.
There is no doubt that, as time shall go on, the system of building many-storied clusters of rectangular rooms will gradually be abandoned by these people. In the absence of the defensive motive a more convenient system, employing scattered small houses, located near springs and fields, will gradually take its place, thus returning to a mode of building that probably prevailed in the evolution of the pueblo prior to the clustering of many rooms into large defensive villages. Pl. LXXXIII illustrates a building of the type described located on the outskirts of Zuñi, across the river from the main pueblo.
There’s no doubt that, over time, the practice of constructing tall clusters of rectangular rooms will eventually be left behind by these people. Without the need for defense, a more practical system that uses scattered small houses near springs and fields will take its place, bringing back a style of building that likely existed in the development of the pueblo before the grouping of many rooms into large defensive villages. Pl. LXXXIII illustrates a building of the type described located on the outskirts of Zuñi, across the river from the main pueblo.
The cultural distinctions between the Pueblo Indians and neighboring tribes gradually become less clearly defined as investigation progresses. Mr. Cushing’s study of the Zuñi social, political, and religious systems has clearly established their essential identity in grade of culture with those of other tribes. In many of the arts, too, such as weaving, ceramics, etc., these people in no degree surpass many tribes who build ruder dwellings.
The cultural differences between the Pueblo Indians and nearby tribes become less distinct as the research continues. Mr. Cushing’s study of the Zuñi social, political, and religious systems has clearly shown that they share a similar cultural level with other tribes. In many forms of art, like weaving and ceramics, these people do not outperform several tribes that build simpler homes.
228 In architecture, though, they have progressed far beyond their neighbors; many of the devices employed attest the essentially primitive character of the art, and demonstrate that the apparent distinction in grade of culture is mainly due to the exceptional condition of the environment.
228 In architecture, however, they have advanced significantly more than their neighbors; many of the techniques used reveal the fundamentally basic nature of the art and show that the apparent differences in cultural development are largely the result of the unique circumstances of the environment.
FOOTNOTES
1. This chapter is compiled by Cosmos Mindeleff from material collected by A. M. Stephen.
1. This chapter is put together by Cosmos Mindeleff using information gathered by A. M. Stephen.
2. The term by which the Tusayan Indians proper designate themselves. This term does not include the inhabitants of the village of Tewa or Hano, who are called Hanomuh.
2. The name the Tusayan Indians use for themselves. This name does not include the people of the village of Tewa or Hano, who are referred to as Hanomuh.
3. The term yasuna, translated here as “year,” is of rather indefinite significance; it sometimes means thirteen moons and in other instances much longer periods.
3. The term yasuna, translated here as “year,” has a somewhat vague meaning; it can sometimes refer to thirteen moons and, at other times, to much longer periods.
4. See Millstone for April, 1884, Indianapolis, Indiana.
4. See Millstone for April 1884, Indianapolis, Indiana.
5. These two names are common to the kiva in which the Snake order meets and in which the indoor ceremonies pertaining to the Snake-dance are celebrated.
5. These two names are associated with the kiva where the Snake order gathers and where the indoor ceremonies related to the Snake dance take place.
6. Cont. to N.A. Ethn., vol. 4, Houses and House life, pp. 129-131.
6. Cont. to N.A. Ethn., vol. 4, Houses and House life, pp. 129-131.
7. Fifth Ann. Rept. Arch. Inst. Am., p. 74.
7. Fifth Annual Report, Archaeological Institute of America, p. 74.
8. Contributions to N.A. Ethnology, vol. 4. House Life, etc., p. 182.
8. Contributions to N.A. Ethnology, vol. 4. House Life, etc., p. 182.
10. Fifth Ann. Rept. Arch. Inst. Am., p. 92.
10. Fifth Annual Report of the Archaeological Institute of America, p. 92.
INDEX
A | |
Acoma, arrival of the Asanyumu at | 30 |
direction of kivas of | 116 |
kiva trap-doors at | 207 |
Adobe, use in Tusayan | 54, 78 |
use in Zuñi attributed to foreign influence | 139 |
necessity for protecting against rain | 156 |
used in Spanish churches | 224 |
Adobe balls used in garden walls Adobe balls used in garden walls |
146 |
Adobe bricks, in Hawikut church Adobe bricks at Hawikut church |
81 |
use modern in Zuñi | 138 |
Adobe mortar, in Tâaaiyalana structures Adobe mortar in Tâaaiyalana buildings |
90 |
Cibola and Tusayan use of, compared Cibola and Tusayan's use of, compared |
137 |
Adobe walls on stone foundation at Moenkopi Adobe walls on a stone foundation at Moenkopi |
78 |
Áikoka. See Acoma | 30 |
Aiyáhokwi, the descendants of the Asa at Zuñi Aiyáhokwi, the descendants of the Asa at Zuñi |
30 |
Alleyway, Hawikuh | 81 |
Altar, conformity of, to direction of kiva Altar, alignment of, to direction of kiva |
116 |
Andiron, Shumopavi | 176 |
Annular doorway | 192, 193 |
Apache, inroads upon Tusayan by the Apache, advancements into Tusayan by the |
25, 26, 35 |
exposure of southern Cibola to the exposure of southern Cibola to the |
96 |
Architectural nomenclature | 220, 223 |
Architecture, comparison of constructional details of Tusayan and Cibola Architecture, comparing the construction details of Tusayan and Cibola |
100-223 |
adaption to defense | 226, 227 |
adaption to environment | 225, 226, 227, 228 |
Art, textile and fictile, degree of Pueblo advancement in Art, textiles, and ceramics, level of Pueblo development in |
227 |
Arts of Cibola and Tusayan closely related Arts of Cibola and Tusayan are closely related |
224 |
Asa, migrations of the | 30, 31 |
language of the | 37 |
houses of, Hano | 61 |
Asanyumu. See Asa. | |
Awatubi, survey of | 14 |
Spanish mission established at Spanish mission set up at |
22 |
when and by whom built | 29 |
settlement of the Asa at | 30 |
attacked by the Walpi | 34 |
description of ruins of | 49, 50 |
possession of sheep by the | 50 |
clay tubes used as roof drains at clay pipes used as roof drains at |
155 |
fragments of passage wall at wall passage fragments at |
181 |
Aztecs, ruined structures attributed to the Aztecs, destroyed buildings linked to the |
225 |
B | |
Badger people leave Walpi | 31 |
Baho, use of, in kiva consecratory ceremonies Baho, used in kiva dedication ceremonies |
119-120, 129, 130 |
Balcony, notched and terraced | 187 |
Banded masonry | 145 |
Bandelier, A.F., description of chimney Bandelier, A.F., chimney description |
173 |
explorations of | 197 |
on ancient stone inclosures | 216 |
Bat house, description of ruin of Bat house, description of ruin of |
52 |
Bátni, the first pueblo of the Snake people of Tusayan Bátni, the first village of the Snake people of Tusayan |
18 |
Bedsteads not used by Pueblos | 214 |
Beams, Tusayan kivas, taken from Spanish church at Shumopavi Beams, Tusayan kivas, taken from the Spanish church at Shumopavi |
76 |
for supporting upper walls | 144 |
modern finish of | 149 |
construction of steps upon | 162 |
for supporting passageway wall for supporting hallway wall |
181 |
Chaco pueblos, how squared | 184 |
Bear people, settlement in Tusayan of the Bear people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
20, 26 |
removal to Walpi of the | 21, 27 |
movements of | 27, 30, 31, 38 |
Bear-skin-rope people, settlement in Tusayan of the Bear-skin-rope people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
26, 27 |
Benches or ledges of masonry, Zuñi rooms Benches or ledges of stone, Zuñi rooms |
110 |
Tusayan kivas | 121, 123, 125 |
Mashongnavi mungkiva | 127 |
around rooms of pueblo houses around pueblo house rooms |
213 |
Bins for storage in Tusayan rooms Bins for storage in Tusayan rooms |
109, 209, 210 |
Blankets formerly used to cover doorways Blankets that were once used to cover doorways |
182, 188, 189, 194 |
Blue Jay people, settlement in Tusayan of the Blue Jay people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
26, 27 |
Bond stones used in pueblo walls Bond stones used in pueblo walls |
144, 198 |
Boss, or andiron, Shumopavi | 176 |
Boundary line, Hano and Sichumovi Boundary line, Hano and Sichumovi |
36 |
Boundary mark, Shumopavi and Oraibi Boundary marker, Shumopavi and Oraibi |
28 |
Boxes for plumes | 210 |
Bricks of adobe modern in Zuñi Bricks of adobe are modern in Zuñi. |
138 |
Brush, use of, in roof construction Brush, use of, in roof construction |
150 |
Brush shelters | 217-219 |
Burial custom of K’iakima natives Burial tradition of K’iakima natives |
86 |
Burial inclosures at K’iakima | 147 |
Burial place of Zuñi | 148 |
Burrowing Owl people, settlement in Tusayan of the Burrowing Owl people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
26 |
Buttress, formerly of Halona, existing in Zuñi Buttress, formerly of Halona, now in Zuñi |
88, 89 |
Buttress projections, Zuñi | 111 |
Tusayan rooms | 109, 110 |
girders supported by | 144 |
chimney supported by | 172, 173 |
support of passageway roofs by support of passageway roofs by |
181 |
C | |
Cages for eagles at Zuñi | 214 |
Canyon de Chelly, proposed study of ruins of Canyon de Chelly, proposed study of ruins of |
14 |
Tusayan, tradition concerning villages of Tusayan, tradition about village life |
19 |
early occupancy of, by the Bear people at Tusayan early occupancy of, by the Bear people at Tusayan |
20 |
occupied by the Asa | 30 |
use of whitewash in cliff houses of use of whitewash in cliff houses of |
74, 145 |
circular kivas of | 117, 133 |
finish of roofs of houses of finish of roofs of houses of |
150, 151 |
doorway described and figured doorway depicted and illustrated |
190 |
cliff dwellings of | 217 |
Casa Blanca, traces of whitewashing at Casa Blanca, signs of whitewashing at |
145 |
Castañeda’s account of Cibolan milling Castañeda’s take on Cibolan milling |
211, 212 |
Cattle introduced into Tusayan Cattle brought to Tusayan |
22 |
Cave lodges occupied in historic times Cave lodges used in ancient times |
225 |
Cave used by inhabitants of Kwaituki Cave used by residents of Kwaituki |
57 |
Ceiling plan of Shupaulovi kiva Ceiling plan of Shupaulovi kiva |
123, 125, 126 |
Ceilings, retention of original appearance of rooms through nonrenovation of Ceilings, keeping the original look of rooms by not renovating |
89 |
Cellars not used in Tusayan and Cibola Cellars not used in Tusayan and Cibola |
143 |
Ceremonial chamber. See Kiva. | |
Ceremonial paraphernalia of Tusayan taken by the Navajo Ceremonial items of Tusayan taken by the Navajo |
50 |
Ceremonies connected with Tusayan house-building Ceremonies for Tusayan house-building |
100-104, 168 |
Ceremonies accompanying kiva construction Kiva building ceremonies |
115, 118 |
Ceremonies performed at placing of Zuñi ladders Ceremonies held during the installation of Zuñi ladders |
160 |
Chaco ruins, character of | 14, 70 |
compared with Kin-tiel | 92 |
finish of masonry of | 140, 226 |
upper story partitions of, supported by beams upper story partitions, supported by beams |
144 |
finish of woodwork of | 149, 184 |
symmetry of arrangement of outer openings of symmetry in the arrangement of outer openings of |
195 |
loop-holes in walls of | 198 |
Chairs, lack of in Pueblo houses Chairs are rare in Pueblo houses. |
212 |
Chalowe, description of | 83 |
Charred roof timbers of Tusayan kiva Charred roof beams of Tusayan kiva |
120 |
Chimney. See Fireplace. | |
Chimney-hoods, how constructed Chimney hoods, how made |
169-175 |
Chimneys, traces of in K’iakima Chimneys, remnants in K’iakima |
85 |
remains of, at Matsaki | 86 |
Tusayan | 102 |
Zuñi | 111 |
described and figured | 167-180 |
Chukubi pueblo, built by the Squash people Chukubi village, created by the Squash people |
25 |
description | 58, 59 |
fragments of passage wall at fragments of passage wall at |
181 |
Church, Shumopavi, established by Spanish monks Church, Shumopavi, founded by Spanish monks |
75, 76 |
Hawikuh | 81, 138 |
Ketchipauan, remains of | 81, 82 |
in court of Zuñi | 98, 138, 148 |
See Mission. | |
Churches established in Zuñi and Tusayan Churches built in Zuñi and Tusayan |
224 |
Cibola, ruins and inhabited villages of Cibola, ruins and inhabited villages of |
80-99 |
architecture of compared with that of Tusayan architecture compared to that of Tusayan |
100-223 |
See Zuñi. | |
Circular doorway of Kin-tiel described Kin-tiel's circular doorway described |
192 |
Circular kivas, antiquity of | 116 |
traditional references to | 135 |
absent in Cibolan pueblos | 224 |
Circular room at Oraibi Wash | 54-55 |
Circular rooms at Kin-tiel | 93 |
Circular wall of kiva near Sikyatki Circular wall of kiva near Sikyatki |
117 |
Clay surface of pueblo roofs | 151 |
Clay tubes used as roof drains Clay tubes used as roof drains |
155 |
Cliff dwellings, Moen-kopi | 54 |
use of whitewash in | 74 |
absence of chimneys in | 168 |
developed from temporary shelters evolved from temporary shelters |
217 |
occupied in historic times | 225 |
Climatic conditions, effect of, upon pueblo architecture Climatic conditions and their impact on pueblo architecture |
140, 227 |
Clustering of Tâaaiyalana ruins Clustering of Tâaaiyalana ruins |
89-90 |
Cochití claimed to be a former Tewa pueblo Cochití claimed to be a former Tewa village. |
37 |
Communal village, development of pueblo architecture from conical lodge to Communal village, evolution of pueblo architecture from conical lodge to |
226 |
Consecration of kivas | 129 |
Contours represented on plans, interval of Contours represented on plans, interval of |
45 |
Cooking, pueblo method of | 164 |
Cooking pits and ovens described Cooking pits and ovens explained |
162-166, 176-177 |
Cooking stones of Tusayan, flames of Cooking stones of Tusayan, flames of |
104 |
Copings of walls described | 151-152 |
Coping of hatchways | 203 |
Coping. See Roof-coping. | |
Cords, used for suspending chimney Chimney suspension cords |
170 |
Corner stones of Tusayan kivas Cornerstones of Tusayan kivas |
119 |
Corrals, Payupki | 59 |
Sichumovi | 62-63 |
Hawikuh | 81 |
Ketchipauan | 81 |
modern, at K’iakima | 85 |
how constructed | 146 |
described in detail | 214-217 |
Cotton cultivated by the Tusayan Cotton grown by the Tusayan |
33 |
Courts, Mishiptonga | 52 |
Kwaituki | 56 |
Chukubi | 59 |
Sichumovi | 62 |
Walpi | 63 |
Mashongnavi | 68 |
Shupaulovi | 71 |
Shumopavi | 74 |
Hawikuh | 81 |
Ketchipauan | 81 |
Matsaki | 86 |
Tâaaiyalana | 90 |
Kin-tiel | 92 |
Pescado | 95 |
Zuñi | 98 |
Covered way, how developed | 76 |
Covered passages and gateways described Covered paths and gateways described |
180-182 |
Coyote people, settlement in Tusayan of the Coyote people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
26 |
Coyote kiva, direction of the | 116 |
Crossbars used in fastening wooden doors Crossbars used for securing wooden doors |
183 |
Crosspieces of ladders | 159 |
Cruzate, visit to Awatubi of | 49 |
Culture of pueblo tribes, degree of Culture of pueblo tribes, degree of |
227 |
Cushing, Frank H., identifies K’iakima as scene of death of Estevanico Cushing, Frank H., identifies K’iakima as the place where Estevanico died. |
86 |
excavations at Halona | 88, 193 |
opinion concerning western wall of Halona opinion about the western wall of Halona |
89 |
opinion concerning distribution of Tâaaiyalana ruins opinion about the distribution of Tâaaiyalana ruins |
89-90 |
on the former occupancy of Kin-tiel on the previous occupation of Kin-tiel |
92 |
Haloua identified as one of the Seven Cities of Cibola Haloua was recognized as one of the Seven Cities of Cibola. |
97 |
on Zuñi tradition concerning stone-close on Zuñi tradition about stone-close |
192 |
D | |
Dais of kivas | 121, 122, 123 |
Dance ceremony in kiva consecration Kiva consecration dance ceremony |
130 |
Dance rock, Tusayan, reference to snake dance of Dance rock, Tusayan, reference to snake dance of |
65 |
Débris, how indicated in plans of ruins Débris, as shown in the plans of the ruins |
45 |
an indication of original height of walls an indication of the original height of the walls |
90 |
Decoration, house openings | 145-146 |
Kiva roof timbers | 119, 120 |
ladder crosspieces | 159 |
roof beams | 123, 124 |
wall of Mashongnavi house | 146 |
wooden chair | 213 |
Zuñi window sashes | 196 |
Deer horns used as pegs in Zuñi Deer antlers used as hooks in Zuñi |
111 |
Defense, wall for, at Bat House Defense, a wall for, at Bat House |
52 |
a motive for selection of dwelling site a reason for choosing a place to live |
56 |
architecture relied upon for architecture depended on for |
58 |
method of, of Payupki | 59, 60 |
not a factor in selection of Mashongnavi site not a factor in the selection of the Mashongnavi site |
67 |
features of, at Ojo Calient | 69 |
wall for, at Pueblo Bonito | 70 |
features of, at Tusayan and Zuñi compared features of, at Tusayan and Zuñi compared |
76 |
sites chosen for, inconvenient to sources of subsistence sites chosen for, inconvenient to sources of living |
77 |
use of Kelchipauan church for, by natives use of Kelchipauan church for, by locals |
82 |
the motive of occupation of Tâaaiyalana mesa the reason for occupying Tâaaiyalana mesa |
90 |
provision for, at Kin-tie | 92, 93 |
provisions for, in Ketchipauan church provisions for, in Ketchipauan church |
96 |
motive for, dying out in Zuñi motive for, fading away in Zuñi |
96-97 |
efficiency of, at Zuñi | 97 |
not a motive in selection of site of Zuñi not a motive in the selection of the site of Zuñi |
97 |
gateways arranged for | 180, 182 |
loopholes for | 198 |
adaptation of architecture to adapting architecture to |
225 |
Doors to ground floor rooms of Zuñi Doors to ground floor rooms of Zuñi |
143 |
Doors of various lands described Doors of different lands described |
183-194 |
Doorway, Walpi kiva, closed with cottonwood slab Doorway, Walpi kiva, sealed with a cottonwood plank |
64 |
Kin-tiel | 93 |
position of, in Tusayan | 103 |
stepped form in Tusayan | 109 |
how sealed against intrusion how secure against intrusion |
110 |
window and chimney in one | 121 |
annular | 193 |
Doorways, closed with masonry | 183, 187, 188, 189 |
why made small | 197 |
Drainage of roof, relations of certain roof openings to Drainage of the roof, connections of specific roof openings to |
203-204 |
Drains of roofs described | 153-156 |
Drains. See roof drains. | |
E | |
Eagle cages of Zuñi | 214 |
Eagle people, migration legend of the Eagle people, migration legend of the |
28 |
Earth used in pueblo roof construction Earth used in pueblo roof construction |
150 |
Eaves, lack of, in Tusayan houses Eaves, absence of, in Tusayan homes |
102 |
Echo Cave fireplace described | 168 |
Entrances, uniformity of direction of, in Zuñi kivas Entrances and the uniform direction in Zuñi kivas |
116 |
Environment, adaptation, of architecture to Adaptation of architecture to environment |
225, 226, 227, 228 |
Estevanico’s death, at K’iakima Estevanico's death at K'iakima |
86 |
Estufa. See Kiva. | |
F | |
Families occupying Oraibi | 105-108 |
Farming outlook, Matsaki used as Farming outlook, Matsaki used as |
86 |
near Kin-tiel | 93 |
Farming pueblos, Cibola | 14 |
Moen-kopi | 77 |
Nutria | 94, 95 |
Pescado | 95-96 |
Ojo Caliente | 96 |
Zuñi | 198 |
Fastenings of doors | 186 |
Feathers, use of, in house-building ceremonies Feathers, use of, in house-building ceremonies |
101, 102 |
Feather wand or baho used in kiva-building ceremonials Feather wand or baho used in kiva construction ceremonies |
119, 120, 129, 130 |
Fences of corrals and gardens | 215, 217 |
Fetiches, where placed during kiva ceremonial Fetishes, where placed during kiva ceremonies |
122 |
Tusayan kivas | 130, 131 |
Fire gens, Tebugkihu constructed by the Fire gens, Tebugkihu constructed by the |
57 |
Fire-house or Tebugkihu, Tusayan Firehouse or Tebugkihu, Tusayan |
20, 57, 100, 142, 224 |
Fire people of Tusayan, migration of the Fire people of Tusayan, migration of the |
20 |
Fireplaces | 102, 109, 121, 125, 163, 167-180 |
Floor, Mashongnavi house | 109 |
stone flags, Tusayan kiva | 121 |
sandstone slabs, Shupaulovi kiva sandstone slabs, Shupaulovi kiva |
123 |
Floors in pueblo buildings, various kinds described Floors in pueblo buildings, various types described |
121, 135, 148-151 |
Folk-tale of the Zuñi, describing stone-close Folk-tale of the Zuñi, describing stone-close |
193 |
Food sacrifices in Tusayan house building Food sacrifices in Tusayan house construction |
101, 102 |
Fortress houses the highest type of Pueblo construction Fortress features the most advanced style of Pueblo building. |
77 |
Frames of trap-doors, method of making Frames of trap doors, how to make them |
206 |
Framing of windows, method of | 196-198 |
Fuel, how stored in Tusayan | 103 |
Fuel used in kivas | 121 |
Fuel of kivas, where stored | 124 |
Furniture of the Pueblos described Pueblo furniture described |
208-214 |
G | |
Gardens and corrals of the Pueblos Gardens and pens of the Pueblos |
214-217 |
Gardens and garden walls | 215-217 |
Garden walls, how constructed | 146 |
Gateway at Awatubi | 49 |
Gateway jambs at Kin-tiel, finish of Gateway jambs at Kin-tiel, finish of |
181 |
Gateways, probable existence in Kin-tiel of Gateways, likely existence in Kin-tiel of |
93 |
Gateways and covered passages described Gateways and covered walkways described |
180-182 |
Gateways of corrals | 214 |
Genesis myth of the Tusayan | 16 |
Gentes of Tusayan, grouping of houses by Gentes of Tusayan, a collection of homes by |
24 |
land apportionment by | 29 |
list of traditionary | 38 |
localization of | 104-108 |
Girders supporting upper walls Beams supporting upper walls |
144 |
Tusayan houses supported by piers Tusayan houses on stilts |
151 |
Glass used in modern Pueblo windows Glass used in today’s Pueblo windows |
193 |
Glazing of Pueblo windows | 196, 197 |
Goat kiva of Walpi, height of | 119 |
Gourd used as roof drain | 154, 155 |
Grass, use of, in roof construction Grass, use of, in roof construction |
150 |
Graves, probable existence of, in Kin-tiel Graves, likely presence of, in Kin-tiel |
93 |
Gravestones at K’iakima | 85, 86, 147 |
Greasewood, the ordinary kiva fuel Greasewood, the common kiva fuel |
121 |
Grinding stones. See Metate; Milling. Grinding stones. See metate; milling. |
|
Ground plan, Mashongnavi room | 108 |
Shupaulovi kiva | 125 |
Ground plans of Zuñi and Tusayan compared Ground plans of Zuni and Tusayan compared |
76 |
of mesa villages influenced by prevailing winds of mesa villages influenced by prevailing winds |
182 |
Guyave or piki oven | 173, 175 |
Gyarzobi or Paroquet kiva, roof timbers of Gyarzobi or Paroquet kiva, roof timbers of |
120 |
Gypsum used as whitewash | 73, 74, 172 |
H | |
Hairdressing among the Tusayan Hair styling among the Tusayan |
37 |
Halona, description of | 88, 89 |
remains of the nucleus of Zuñi remains of the nucleus of Zuñi |
97, 98 |
walls of the nucleus of modern Zuñi walls of the nucleus of modern Zuni |
138 |
stone-close at, described | 193 |
“Halving” of timbers in kiva trap-frames “Halving” of timbers in kiva trap frames |
206 |
Hampassawan, description of | 83-85 |
Hand-holds cut in faces of cliffs Handholds carved into the faces of cliffs |
191 |
Hand-holds in frames of trap-doors Handholds on trapdoor frames |
192 |
Hano, Asa group occupy site of Hano, the Asa group occupies the site of |
30 |
description of | 61, 62 |
direction of kivas of | 115 |
kiva, ownership of | 134 |
kivas, list of | 136 |
rude transom over roof beam in rude transom over roof beam in |
187 |
sealed openings in | 199 |
Hano people, length of time spent in Tusayan by the Hano people, duration of time spent in Tusayan by the |
35 |
received by the Tusayan | 36 |
trouble between the Walpi and trouble between the Walpi and |
37 |
Hanomuh, the inhabitants of Hano Hanomuh, the people of Hano |
17 |
definition of | 36 |
Hano traditions regarding settlement in Tusayan Hano traditions about living in Tusayan |
35 |
Harvest time, how determined in Zuñi Harvest time, how determined in Zuñi |
148 |
Hatchways to pueblo houses | 110, 120, 121, 124, 127 |
Hawikuh, description of | 80, 81 |
Hawikuh church, durability of masonry of Hawikuh church, strength of the stonework of |
138 |
Hemenway Southwestern Archeological Expedition, excavations at Halona Hemenway Southwestern Archaeological Expedition, digs at Halona |
193 |
High-house people, a Navajo clan High-house people, a Navajo clan |
30 |
Hinged sashes not in use in Zuñi Hinged sashes not being used in Zuñi |
196 |
Hinges of Pueblo doors | 184 |
Hodge, F. Webb, on stone-close of Halona Hodge, F. Webb, on the stone enclosure of Halona |
193 |
Holmes, William H., on ruins of the San Juan Holmes, William H., on the ruins of San Juan |
147 |
Homólobi, the early home of the Sun and Water peoples Homólobi, the original home of the Sun and Water peoples |
29 |
legend of Water people concerning legend of Water people about |
31 |
Hopituh, the native name of the Tusayan Hopituh, the native name of the Tusayan |
17 |
Hopituh marriage within phratries and gentes Hopituh marriage within phratries and clans |
24 |
Horn House, description of ruin of Horn House, description of ruin of |
50, 51 |
Horn people migration legend | 18 |
early settlement in Tusayan of the early settlement in Tusayan of the |
19 |
House-building rites of Tusayan Tusayan house-building ceremonies |
100-104 |
House clusters in Zuñi, arrangement of House clusters in Zuñi, arrangement of |
98 |
Hungo Pavie, finish of roofs in Hungo Pavie, roof finishing in |
150 |
I | |
Interior arrangement of pueblos Layout of pueblos |
108-111 |
Interior of Zuñi house described Interior of Zuñi house detailed |
110 |
Irrigation of gardens near Walpi Irrigating gardens near Walpi |
217 |
J | |
Jackson, W. H., on ruins of the San Juan Jackson, W. H., on the ruins of the San Juan |
147 |
photographs of pueblo ruins by photos of pueblo ruins by |
147 |
describes fireplace of Echo Cave describes Echo Cave's fireplace |
168 |
Jar of large size used for storage Jar of large size used for storage |
210 |
Jars used in chimney construction Jars for chimney building |
180 |
Jeditoh group of ruins | 52, 53 |
Jemez oven-opening described | 165 |
K | |
Kaékibi, an ancient pueblo | 30 |
Kaiwáika. See Laguna | 30 |
Kápung. See Santa Clara | 37 |
Katchina kiva of Oraibi | 135 |
Katchina people depart from Oraibi for eastern Tusayan villages Katchina people leave Oraibi to head to the eastern Tusayan villages. |
26, 27 |
Katchinkihu, occurrence of, in ruined kiva near Sikyatki Katchinkihu, occurrence of, in a destroyed kiva near Sikyatki |
117 |
described | 121, 123 |
Shupaulovi kiva | 126 |
Mashonguavi mungkiva | 127 |
Kótite. See Cochití. | |
Ketchipauan church built of stone Stone-built Ketchipauan church |
224 |
Ketchipauan, description of | 81-83 |
Kiáini. See High-house people | 30 |
K’iakima, description of | 85, 86 |
upright stone slabs at | 147 |
Kikoli rooms occupied in winter Kikoli rooms booked in winter |
103, 104, 131 |
Kin-tiel, description of | 91-94 |
compared with Nutria | 94 |
compared with Pescado | 96 |
plan of, prearranged | 100 |
compared with Oraibi | 114 |
occurrence of upright stone slab at occurrence of upright stone slab at |
147-148 |
beams of ruins of | 149 |
upper room of, paved with stone upper room of, paved with stone |
151 |
fireplace in room of | 163, 168 |
defensive gateway at | 181 |
Kin-tiel, finish of gateway jambs at Kin-tiel, finish of gateway jambs at |
181 |
circular doorway at, described circular doorway, as described |
192, 193 |
openings at, of uniform height openings at uniform height |
194 |
site of | 224 |
Kisákobi, description of pueblo of Kisákobi, description of town of |
21 |
Kishoni, or uncovered shade | 217-218 |
“Kisi” construction | 217-219 |
Kitdauwi—the house song of Tusayan Kitdauwi—the Tusayan house song |
118-119 |
Kiva, study of construction of Kiva, construction study of |
14 |
remains of, at Payupki | 60 |
Mashongnavi | 66 |
of Moen-kopi | 78 |
origin of the name | 111 |
ancient form of | 116, 117 |
native explanation of position of native explanation of position of |
118 |
duties of mungwi, or chief of the duties of mungwi, or chief of the |
133 |
ownership of | 133-134 |
motive for building | 134-135 |
significance of structural plan of importance of structural plan of |
135 |
measurements of | 136 |
hatchways of | 201-202, 205-207 |
openings of, at Acoma | 207 |
See Mungkiva. | |
Kivas, excavated, at Awatubi | 50 |
Hano | 61 |
Sichumovi | 62 |
Walpi | 63, 64, 65 |
Shupaulovi | 72 |
Shumopavi | 74 |
Kin-tiel and Cibola compared Kin-tiel vs. Cibola |
93 |
Zuñi, where located during Spanish occupancy Zuñi, where it was located during Spanish occupation |
99 |
in Tusayan | 111-137 |
typical plans of | 118-129 |
dimensions of | 118, 136 |
of, measurements of | 118, 136 |
annually repaired by women | 129 |
uses of | 130 |
nomenclature of | 130, 223-223 |
Tusayan, list of | 136 |
nonuse of chimneys in | 178 |
Zuñi, stone window-frames of Zuñi, stone window frames of |
197 |
Kwaituki, description of ruin of Kwaituki, description of destruction of |
56-57 |
Kwálakwai, Hano tradition related by Kwálakwai, Hano tradition shared by |
35 |
Kwetcap tutwi, the second pueblo of the snake people of Tusayan Kwetcap tutwi, the second village of the snake people of Tusayan |
18 |
L | |
Ladders, arrangement in Tusayan kiva Ladders, setup in Tusayan kiva |
121 |
withdrawal of rungs to prevent use of withdrawal of rungs to prevent use of |
113 |
significance of position of, in kivas significance of position of, in kivas |
135 |
described | 156-162 |
second-story terrace of Tusayan reached principally by second-story terrace of Tusayan reached mainly by |
182 |
openings for, in roofs | 205 |
Laguna, arrival of the Asanyumu at Laguna, arrival of the Asanyumu at |
30 |
Lalénkobáki, a female society of Tusayan Lalénkobáki, a women's community of Tusayan |
134 |
Land apportionment by gentes in Tusayan Land distribution by clans in Tusayan |
29 |
Language of the Asa and Hano of Tusayan Language of the Asa and Hano of Tusayan |
37 |
Languages of Tusayan, tradition regarding difference in Languages of Tusayan, tradition regarding difference in |
36 |
Las Animas ruins, trap-door frames in Las Animas ruins, trap-door frames in |
206 |
Latches of doors | 186-187 |
Latch strings used on Zuñi doors Latch strings used on Zuñi doors |
183 |
Lathing or wattling of kiva walls Lathing or wattling of kiva walls |
126 |
Ledges of masonry in kivas | 121 |
Ledges or benches around rooms Ledges or benches in rooms |
213 |
Lenbaki, society of Tusayan | 18 |
Light, method of introducing, in inner rooms Light, how to bring it in, in private spaces |
207 |
Lighting, method of, in crowded portions of Zuñi Lighting methods in crowded areas of Zuñi |
99 |
Lintels of old windows embedded in masonry Lintels of old windows set in brickwork |
200 |
Lizard people move from Walpi | 31, 38 |
Lock and key of wood, how made Lock and wooden key, how it’s made |
187 |
Loom appurtenances | 212 |
Loom posts of kivas | 128-129, 132 |
Loophole-like openings in pueblo buildings Pueblo buildings with loophole openings |
127, 198 |
M | |
Mamzrántiki, an Oraibi society of women Mamzrántiki, a group of women from Oraibi |
134 |
Mandan ladder described and figured Mandan ladder illustrated and explained |
158 |
Maricopa, myth of the Water people of Tusayan concerning the Maricopa, the legend of the Water people of Tusayan regarding the |
32 |
Marriage of the Hopituh within phratries and gentes Marriage of the Hopituh within clans and groups |
24 |
Mashongnavi, origin of name of Mashongnavi, name origin of |
26 |
settlement of Paroquet and Katchina peoples in settlement of Paroquet and Katchina peoples in |
27 |
settlementof the Water people at settlement of the Water people at |
32 |
description of ruins of | 48 |
age of masonry at | 66 |
description of | 66-70 |
ground plan of room of | 108 |
direction of kivas of | 115 |
description of dais of kiva at description of dais of kiva at |
122 |
list of kivas at | 136 |
wall decoration at | 146 |
notched ladder of | 157-158 |
pi-gummi ovens at | 163-164 |
shrines of | 167 |
chimney hoods of | 170-171 |
second-story fireplace at | 174 |
doorway with transom at | 190 |
corrals of rude stonework at stone corrals at |
214 |
See Old Mashongnavi. | |
Masonry, ancient, at Nutria | 94 |
Ojo Caliente carelessly constructed Ojo Caliente built haphazardly |
96 |
exterior, of kivas | 114 |
Masonry of Pueblo Bonito, skill shown in Masonry of Pueblo Bonito, skill shown in |
195 |
Mat close for kiva hatchways | 127, 128 |
Matsaki, description of | 86 |
sun symbol at | 148 |
Meal, votive, used in pueblo house-building Meal, a ceremonial offering, used in building Pueblo homes. |
101 |
Mealing trough. See Milling. | |
Metate used as roof-drain | 154, 155 |
Metates, or grinding stones, how arranged in pueblo houses Metates, or grinding stones, were arranged in pueblo houses. |
109, 110, 210, 211 |
Migration, effect of, upon pueblo architecture Migration's effect on pueblo architecture |
15 |
Migration of the Tusayan | 17 |
Migration of Tusayan Water people Migration of Tusayan Water community |
31, 32 |
Migration of the Horn people | 18, 19 |
Migration of the Bear people of Tusayan Migration of the Bear people of Tusayan |
20 |
Migration of the Asanynmu of Tusayan Migration of the Asanynmu of Tusayan |
30 |
Milling troughs of Pueblo households Milling troughs in Pueblo homes |
109, 210, 212 |
Mindeleff, Cosmos, acknowledgments to Mindeleff, Cosmos, thanks to |
14, 15 |
on traditional history of Tusayan on the history of Tusayan |
16-41 |
Mindeleff, Victor, paper on pueblo architecture Mindeleff, Victor, paper on pueblo architecture |
3-228 |
Mishiptonga, description of ruin of Mishiptonga, description of destruction of |
52-53 |
Mission buildings of Shumopavi Mission buildings at Shumopavi |
27, 75-76 |
Mission house at Walpi, timbers of, used in Walpi kiva Mission house at Walpi, timbers from, used in the Walpi kiva |
119 |
Missions of Tusayan | 22, 49 |
Moen-kopi surveyed and studied Moen-kopi researched and analyzed |
14 |
description of ruins of | 53-54 |
description of village of | 77 |
Mole people, settlement in Tusayan of the Mole people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
27 |
Montezuma Canyon ruins, use of large stone blocks in Montezuma Canyon ruins, using large stone blocks in |
147 |
Monument marking boundary of Oraibi and Shumopavi Monument indicating the border between Oraibi and Shumopavi |
28 |
Morgan, L.H., Mandan ladder described by Morgan, L.H., Mandan ladder described by |
158 |
on. trap-door frames in Las Animas ruins on. trap-door frames in Las Animas ruins |
205 |
Mormon and Pueblo building compared Mormon and Pueblo building comparison |
148 |
Mormons, effect of the, upon development of Moen-kopi Mormons, effect of the, upon development of Moen-kopi |
77 |
establishment of woolen mill at Moen-kopi by the establishment of a woolen mill at Moen-kopi by the |
78 |
fort built by, at Moen-kopi | 184 |
lock and key contrivance of | 187 |
Mortar of adobe mud | 137 |
Mortars used in Pueblo households Mortars used in Pueblo homes |
212 |
Mortised door in Zuñi house | 110, 186 |
Mummy cave, Arizona, ruin in | 64 |
finish of roofs in ruins of | 150 |
Mungkiva, Mashongnavi | 127 |
of Shupaulovi | 113, 122 |
Tusayan | 134 |
N | |
Nambé, Tewa pueblo | 37 |
Navajo, Asa of Tusayan live among Navajo, Asa of Tusayan live among |
30 |
huts of, closed with blankets blanket-covered huts |
189 |
method of sheep-herding compared with Pueblo method of sheep-herding compared with Pueblo |
214 |
Nelson, E.W., graves unearthed by Nelson, E.W., graves uncovered by |
86 |
collection of stone-closes by collection of stone walls by |
193 |
Niches, use of, in kivas | 121, 122 |
Niches formed in old window openings Niches created in old window openings |
110, 200, 208-209 |
Nomenclature of Tusayan structural details Nomenclature of Tusayan structural features |
220-223 |
Númi. See Nambé. | |
Notched logs used as ladders | 157-158 |
Nutria, compared with Kin-tiel Nutria, compared to Kin-tiel |
91 |
description of | 91-95 |
Nuvayauma, old Mashongnavi tradition related by Nuvayauma, an old Mashongnavi tradition shared by |
47-48 |
Nuvwatikyuobi kiva | 120 |
O | |
Oak mound kiva, Tusayan, decadence of membership of Oak mound kiva, Tusayan, decline of membership of |
135 |
Ohke. See San Juan. | |
Ojo Caliente, a modern village Ojo Caliente, a trendy village |
54, 96-97 |
chinked walls of | 142 |
Old Mashongnavi, tradition concerning occupation of Old Mashongnavi, tradition concerning occupation of |
47-48 |
Openings, splayed, in Ketchipauan church Openings, splayed, in Ketchipauan church |
82 |
walls of Tâaaiyalana structures walls of Tâaaiyalana buildings |
90 |
Kin-tiel walls | 92, 93 |
oblique Zuñi | 98, 207-208 |
to kivas | 113-114 |
in wall of Zuñi kiva | 114 |
in lee walls | 182 |
Openings of Pueblo houses banded with whitewash Openings of Pueblo houses painted with whitewash |
145-146 |
Oraibi, retirement of Sikyátki inhabitants to Oraibi, retirement of Sikyátki inhabitants to |
24 |
departure of Ketchina and Paroquet peoples from departure of Ketchina and Paroquet peoples from |
27 |
settlement by the Bears of | 27 |
traditions regarding first settlement of traditions about first settlement of |
27 |
settlement of the Water people at settlement of the Water people at |
33 |
affray between the Walpi and brawl between the Walpi and |
35 |
description of | 76-77 |
families occupying | 105-108 |
direction of kivas of | 115-116 |
rare use of plastering on outer walls of rare use of plastering on outer walls of |
144 |
Oraibi, notched ladders described and figured Oraibi, notched ladders described and figured |
157-158 |
stone steps at, figured | 161 |
corral walls at, laid without mortar corral walls at, built without mortar |
147 |
distribution of gentes of | 104-105 |
kiva for women | 134 |
list of kivas of | 137 |
kiva, hatchway of | 201 |
corrals at, large size of | 214 |
Oraibi-Shumopavi boundary stone Oraibi-Shumopavi boundary marker |
28 |
Oraibi wash, ruins on the | 54-56 |
Orientation of kivas | 115-116 |
Ovens at Pescado | 95 |
upon roofs | 151 |
various kinds described | 162-166 |
in Zuñi | 164-165 |
Oven-shaped structures described and figured Oven-shaped structures detailed and illustrated |
167 |
Oven-surface imbedded with pottery scales Oven surface embedded with pottery scales |
139 |
P | |
Paintings on kiva walls | 131 |
Palát Kivabi, the pristine habitat of the Squash and Sun people of Tusayan Palát Kivabi, the untouched home of the Squash and Sun people of Tusayan |
25, 29 |
Paneled doors in modern pueblos Paneled doors in contemporary pueblos |
184-186 |
Parallelogramic form of Tusayan buildings Parallelogram shape of Tusayan buildings |
102-118 |
Paroquet people, settlement in Shumopavi of the Paroquet people, living in Shumopavi of the |
37 |
Partitions in Ketchipauan church Partitions in Ketchipauan church |
82 |
Partitions of upper story supported by beams Partitions of the upper floor supported by beams |
144 |
Passageways, Shupaulovi | 72 |
Shumopavi | 74 |
rarity of, at Oraibi | 76 |
description of | 180-182 |
Paving Shupaulovi kiva | 126 |
Paving stones of kiva floor, how finished Paving stones of the kiva floor, how they were finished. |
125 |
Payupki, tradition concerning pueblo of Payupki, tradition concerning the pueblo of |
40 |
migration legend | 40 |
description of | 59-60 |
finish of masonry of | 143 |
fragments of passage wall at fragments of wall passage at |
181 |
Peaches planted by the Asa people Peaches planted by the Asa people |
30 |
Pegs, deer horns used as, in Zuñi Pegs, used as deer horns, in Zuñi |
111 |
Pegs for suspending kiva fuel | 121 |
Peña Blanca formerly inhabited by the Hano Peña Blanca was once home to the Hano. |
35 |
Peñasco Blanco, occurrence of upright stone slab at Peñasco Blanco, where you can find an upright stone slab at |
148 |
method of roof construction at roof construction method at |
150 |
Pescado compared with Kin-tiel Fish compared with Kin-tiel |
91 |
description of | 95-96 |
corral walls at, how constructed how corral walls are built |
147 |
outside steps at | 160 |
ovens at, described and figured ovens at, described and illustrated |
165-166 |
fragment of stone close in steps of fragment of stone close in steps of |
193 |
stone inclosure in court of | 214 |
Pestles or crushers used with Pueblo mortars Pestles or crushers used with Pueblo mortars |
212 |
Petroglyph, or sun-symbol at Matsaki Petroglyph or sun symbol at Matsaki |
86 |
Ketchipauan church | 82 |
legend of the Tusayan concerning legend of the Tusayan about |
32 |
Phratries, Tusayan | 24, 38 |
Pictograph on Oraibi-Shumopavi boundary monument Pictograph on Oraibi-Shumopavi border monument |
28 |
Piers of masonry for supporting girders Piers made of stone to support beams |
151 |
Piers. See Buttresses. | |
Pi-gummi ovens of Mashongnavi | 163 |
Piki or guyave oven | 173-175 |
Piki stone, process of making | 175 |
Pima, myth of the Water people of Tusayan concerning the Pima, myth of the Water People of Tusayan concerning the |
32 |
opinion of the, as to ancient stone inclosures opinion of the, regarding ancient stone enclosures |
216 |
Pinawa, description of | 86, 88 |
Pine invariably used for kiva ladders Pine is always used for kiva ladders. |
135 |
Pink clay used in house decorations Pink clay used in home decor |
146 |
Pits for cooking | 163 |
Plan of villages, traditional mention of Plan of villages, traditional mention of |
104 |
Plans and descriptions, Tusayan ruins Plans and details, Tusayan ruins |
45-60 |
inhabited villages | 61-79 |
Cibolan ruins | 80 |
Zuñi villages | 94-99 |
Plan of pueblo houses not usually prearranged Plan of pueblo houses not usually pre-planned |
100-162 |
Planting time, how determined in Zuñi Planting time, how it's determined in Zuñi |
148 |
Plaster, frequent renewal of, at Shumopavi Renewed plaster at Shumopavi |
73 |
Plastering, renovation of rooms by frequent Plastering, redesigning rooms often |
89 |
on outer walls in Ojo Caliente on outer walls in Ojo Caliente |
96 |
custom formerly observed in | 102 |
on floor in Mashongnavi | 109 |
kiva walls | 115 |
Shupaulovi kiva, condition of Shupaulovi kiva, state of |
124-125 |
Shupaulovi kiva | 126 |
on walls | 140 |
on masonry | 144 |
chimney hoods | 169, 172 |
side hole of door for fastening side hole of door for fastening |
183-184 |
Platform in floor of Tusayan kiva Platform in the floor of the Tusayan kiva |
121 |
Platform at head of steps | 161-162 |
Plaza. See Court. | |
Plume boxes | 210 |
Plume stick, baho, or feather wand, used in Kiva consecratory ceremonials Plume stick, baho, or feather wand, used in Kiva ceremonial blessings |
119-120, 129, 130 |
Plume-stick shrines at Mashongnavi Plume-stick altars at Mashongnavi |
167 |
Pojoaque, a Tewa pueblo | 37 |
Pokwádi. See Pojoaque | 37 |
Polaka, Hano tradition given by Polaka, Hano tradition provided by |
35 |
Poles for suspension of blankets, etc. Blanket hanging poles, etc. |
110, 189, 208, 214 |
Ponobi kiva of Oraibi, wall lathing of Ponobi kiva of Oraibi, wall lathing of |
126 |
Population, enlargement of pueblos necessitated by increase of Population growth led to the expansion of towns due to the increase of |
70 |
Porch posts | 81, 82 |
Posówe, a former Tewa pueblo | 37 |
Posts of porch, remains of, at Hawikuh and Ketchipauan Posts of the porch, remnants of, at Hawikuh and Ketchipauan |
81, 82 |
Posts sunk in floor forming part of loom Posts set into the floor as part of the loom |
212 |
Pots used in chimney construction Chimney construction pots |
179-180 |
Pottery fragments, Horn House ruin Pottery shards, Horn House ruin |
51 |
Kwaituki | 57 |
ruin on Oraibi wash | 55 |
used in mud-plastered walls | 139 |
Pottery of Payupki, character of Payupki pottery, character of |
60 |
Poultry house of Sichumovi | 167 |
Prayer plume, or baho, used in kiva consecratory ceremonials Prayer plume, or baho, used in kiva blessing ceremonies |
119, 120, 129, 130 |
Props used for fastening wooden doors Props used for securing wooden doors |
183 |
Pueblo architecture, study of, by Victor Mindeleff Pueblo architecture, study of, by Victor Mindeleff |
8-228 |
Pueblo Bonito, additions to | 70 |
the largest yet examined | 92 |
finish of roof of | 150 |
stairway described | 160 |
symmetry of arrangement of outer openings of symmetry of arrangement of outer openings of |
195 |
skill shown in masonry of | 195 |
Pueblo buildings, mode of additions to Pueblo buildings, way of adding to |
70, 97, 98, 102, 148-149 |
Pueblo construction in Tusayan and Cibola, details of Pueblo construction in Tusayan and Cibola, details of |
137-223 |
Pueblo Grande. See Kin-tiel. | |
Pueblo openings, carelessness in placing Pueblo openings, careless placement |
196 |
Pueblo remains, area occupied by Pueblo ruins, area occupied by |
13 |
Pueblo revolt of 1680 | 89 |
Pueblos of Tusayan and Cibola compared Pueblos of Tusayan and Cibola compared |
80 |
Pueblos, inhabited | 61-79, 94-99 |
Pyramidal form of pueblo house rows Pyramidal shape of pueblo house rows |
61 |
R | |
Rabbit-skin robes used to cover doorways Rabbit-skin robes used to cover doorways |
182, 194 |
Racks for suspending clothes | 208, 214 |
Rawhide thong used in pueblo construction to fasten lock Rawhide thong used in pueblo construction to secure the lock |
186, 187, 214 |
Rectangular kivas, antiquity of Rectangular kivas, age of |
116 |
Rectangular rooms, how developed Rectangular rooms, how evolved |
226 |
Rectangular type of architecture Rectangular architecture |
72 |
Reeds used for kiva lathing | 126 |
Repair of houses infrequent in Tusayan Repair of houses is rare in Tusayan. |
73 |
Reservoirs, pueblo | 82-83, 91, 92, 97 |
Reservoir site as affecting selection of dwelling site Reservoir location impacting dwelling site choice |
51-52 |
Revolt of the Pueblos in 1680 | 23 |
Rites and methods of Tusayan kiva building Rituals and techniques for building Tusayan kivas |
118-137 |
Rites of house-building at Tusayan House-building rituals at Tusayan |
100-104 |
Rito de los Frijoles, chimney of, described Rito de los Frijoles, chimney of, described |
173 |
Roof construction, pueblo buildings Pueblo building roof construction |
120, 149 |
Roof-coping of Tusayan houses | 102 |
Roof-drains, pueblo buildings | 102, 153-156 |
Roof-openings, pueblo buildings Rooftop openings, pueblo buildings |
61, 63, 77, 98, 169, 178, 201-208 |
Roofs, pueblo buildings | 63, 102, 119, 148-151 |
Roof timbers of kivas | 119 |
Rooms, arrangement of, into rows in Tusayan Rooms, arranged in rows in Tusayan |
49 |
confused arrangement of, in Walpi jumbled layout in Walpi |
63 |
Tâaaiyalana ruins, arrangement of Tâaaiyalana ruins, layout of |
90 |
circular, at Kin-tiel | 93 |
Tusayan, smaller than in Zuñi Tusayan, smaller than Zuñi |
108 |
names of, in Tusayan | 223 |
Rows of houses forming Shumopavi Rows of houses in Shumopavi |
74 |
Ruins, method of survey of | 45 |
Ruins, Tusayan | 45-60 |
between Horn House and Bat House between Horn House and Bat House |
51 |
Oraibi wash | 54-56 |
Cibola | 80 |
Tâaaiyalana | 89 |
Rungs of ladders, how attached Ladder rungs, how attached |
158, 159 |
S | |
Sacrifices of food in Tusayan house-building Sacrifices of food in Tusayan home construction |
101, 102 |
Sandals of yucca found in Canyon de Chelly Sandals made from yucca discovered in Canyon de Chelly |
133 |
Sandstone used in pueblo construction, how quarried Sandstone used in pueblo construction, how it’s quarried. |
225 |
San Felipe, return of Payupki to San Felipe, return of Payupki to |
41 |
San Juan, a Tewa pueblo | 37 |
Santa Clara doubtfully identified with Kápung Santa Clara uncertainly connected with Kápung |
37 |
Santo Domingo, settlement of the Asanyumu Santo Domingo, home of the Asanyumu |
30 |
Sash of rude construction in window openings Sash made of rough materials in window openings |
196 |
Sealing of doorways of pueblo buildings Sealing doors of pueblo buildings |
110, 183-184, 198-201 |
Seats of stone in Tusayan kivas Seats of stone in Tusayan kivas |
132 |
Selenite used in pueblo windows Selenite used in pueblo windows |
196, 197 |
Semisubterranean kivas of Tusayan Tusayan's underground kivas |
113 |
Seven cities of Cibola. See Cibola. Seven cities of Cibola. See Cibola. |
|
Sheep, introduced into Tusayan Sheep brought to Tusayan |
22 |
possessed by the Awatubi | 50 |
introduction of, among the Pueblos introduction of, among the Pueblo people |
214 |
Shitáimu pueblo | 28, 48, 49 |
Shelters in pueblo fields | 60, 198, 217-219 |
Shelves, pueblo buildings | 109, 173, 209 |
Shrine, Matsaki | 86 |
court of Shupaulovi | 71 |
court of Shumopavi | 75 |
Tâaaiyalana | 90 |
Shrines, pueblo | 72, 148, 167 |
Shumopavi, Spanish mission established at Shumopavi, Spanish mission founded at |
22 |
by whom built | 27 |
removal of portion of Bear people from removal of a portion of Bear people from |
27 |
description of | 73-76 |
kivas of | 113, 114, 137 |
primitive andiron at | 176 |
piki stone at | 176 |
fireplace and chimney of | 176, 177 |
ground cooking-pit of | 178 |
Shumopavi-Oraibi boundary stone Shumopavi-Oraibi boundary marker |
28 |
Shumopavi people, removal of, to mesa site Shumopavi people, relocation to mesa site |
23 |
Shupaulovi, settlement of Paroquet and Ketchina peoples in Shupaulovi, community of the Paroquet and Ketchina peoples in |
27 |
when established | 29 |
settlement of Bear people at settlement of Bear tribe at |
30 |
settlement of the water people at settlement of the water people at |
32 |
description of | 71-73 |
mungkiva of, described | 113 |
direction of kivas of | 115 |
description of dais of kiva of description of dais of kiva of |
123 |
ground and ceiling plans of kiva of ground and ceiling plans of the kiva of |
125 |
list of kivas of | 136 |
description of chimney-hood at description of chimney hood at |
171, 172 |
passageway at, described | 181 |
Sichumovi, settled by peoples from Walpi Sichumovi, established by people from Walpi |
31 |
derivation of term | 38 |
description of | 62, 63 |
direction of kivas of | 115 |
ownership of kiva of | 134 |
list of kivas of | 136 |
poultry-house of | 167 |
fireplace and mantel of | 173 |
piki stone at | 175 |
Sikyatki, ruin of | 20, 21 |
pueblo of | 24 |
ancient kiva near | 117 |
Sikyátki people dispute with the Walpi Sikyátki people argue with the Walpi. |
24 |
slaughtered by the Walpi | 25 |
Sills of doors | 110, 186, 194 |
Sióki. See Zuñi | 30 |
Sipapuh, Tusayan kivas | 117, 121, 122, 123, 126, 130, 131, 135 |
Sites of pueblo buildings, why selected Sites of pueblo buildings, why they were chosen |
63, 66, 90, 97, 112, 223 |
Slabs of stone in pueblo architecture Slabs of stone in pueblo architecture |
147 |
Slavery among the Tusayan | 41 |
Smallpox prevalent in Tusayan | 38, 134 |
Smoke escape through roof-opening and transoms Smoke escapes through the roof opening and transoms. |
189, 204, 206, 207 |
Snake dance, relation of dance-rock to Snake dance, relationship of dance-rock to |
65 |
Snake people, the first occupants of the Tusayan region Snake people, the original inhabitants of the Tusayan area |
17 |
construction of modern Walpi by the construction of modern Walpi by the |
23 |
Snow, use of, as water supply by the Zuñi Snow, its use as a water supply by the Zuñi |
91 |
Spaniards, early visit of, to Tusayan Spaniards, early visit of, to Tusayan |
21, 22 |
Spanish authority, effect of, upon purity of Zuñi kiva type Spanish authority, its effect on the purity of the Zuñi kiva type |
112 |
Spanish beams in Tusayan kivas Spanish influences in Tusayan kivas |
119, 123, 124, 125, 126 |
Spanish churches at pueblos, Hawikuk Spanish churches in towns, Hawikuk |
81, 82, 138 |
Spanish influence in Zuñi and Tusayan Spanish influence in Zuñi and Tusayan |
169, 180, 196, 213, 224 |
Spanish missions established in Tusayan Spanish missions set up in Tusayan |
22 |
Spider people, settlement in Tusayan of the Spider people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
27 |
Splash-stones described and figured Splash stones described and illustrated |
155, 156 |
Splayed openings in Ketchipauan church Openings in Ketchipauan church |
82 |
Squash people, settlement in Tusayan of the Squash people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
25 |
Stakes used in construction of stone walls Stakes used in building stone walls |
147 |
Stephen, A. M., material on traditional history of Tusayan collected by Stephen, A. M., material on the traditional history of Tusayan collected by |
16-41 |
opinion on Walpi architectural features view on Walpi's architecture |
72 |
acknowledgments to | 100 |
on distribution of Oraibi gentes on distribution of Oraibi groups |
104, 105 |
on orientation of Tusayan kivas on the orientation of Tusayan kivas |
115 |
discovery of ancient kiva type near Sikyatki discovery of an ancient kiva type near Sikyatki |
117 |
typical kiva measurements by typical kiva dimensions by |
122 |
on wattling or lathing of kiva walls on building or framing kiva walls |
126 |
on significance of structural plan of kiva on significance of the structural plan of kiva |
135 |
collection of primitive andirons or bosses by collection of primitive andirons or bosses by |
176 |
Steps and ladders described | 156-162 |
Steps cut in faces of cliffs | 191 |
Steps or foot-holes of Walpi trail Steps or footpaths of the Walpi trail |
65 |
Steps to kivas | 114 |
Stone, size, character, and finish of, in pueblo ruins Stone, dimensions, style, and texture of, in pueblo ruins |
55, 58, 60, 138 |
means of obtaining, in Zuñi | 139 |
effect of use of, in chimney hoods effect of use of, in chimney hoods |
172 |
corrals | 214 |
flags used to floor Tusayan kiva flags used to floor Tusayan kiva |
121 |
inclosures in Southern Arizona enclosures in Southern Arizona |
216 |
roof drains, curious forms of roof drains, interesting shapes of |
154 |
shelters, possible remains of, at Payupki shelters, possible remains of, at Payupki |
60 |
slabs formerly used to close doorways slabs that were previously used to close doorways |
188 |
Stone-close anciently used | 192, 193 |
Stone wedges used in pueblo wall finish Stone wedges used in pueblo wall finishing |
140, 142 |
Stonework, Shumopavi | 75 |
at Oraibi at Oraibi |
144 |
Mormon and Pueblos compared | 148 |
Stone steps, Pescado | 95 |
Tusayan | 157 |
Stools used by the Pueblos | 212, 213 |
Storage facilities of pueblo dwellings Pueblo home storage facilities |
57, 62, 103, 109, 143, 144, 182, 209 |
Straw adobe made by Spaniards | 138, 224 |
Structural features of kivas similar Kivas have similar structural features. |
129 |
Subterranean character of kivas Underground nature of kivas |
63, 72, 112, 113 |
Sullivan, Jeremiah, Payupki tradition obtained by Sullivan, Jeremiah, Payupki tradition obtained by |
40 |
Sunflower stalks used in chimney construction Sunflower stems used in building chimneys |
170 |
Sun people of Tusayan | 29 |
Supplies, how taken to Walpi mesa Supplies, how delivered to Walpi mesa |
65 |
Survey of Tusayan and Cibola, methods of Survey of Tusayan and Cibola, methods of |
44-45 |
T | |
Tâaaiyalana, relation of K’iakima to Tâaialana, relation of K’iakima to |
85 |
stone inclosures at base of | 85 |
description of ruins of | 89-91 |
flight of Zuñis to, during Pueblo revolt flight of Zuñis to, during Pueblo revolt |
89 |
mesa of, temporarily occupied mesa of, temporarily occupied |
223 |
Tables not used in Pueblo houses Tables not used in Pueblo houses |
212, 214 |
Talla Hogan. See Awatubi | 49-50 |
Taos formerly partly inhabited by the Tewa Taos was previously partially populated by the Tewa. |
37 |
Tceewáge. See Peña Blanca. | |
Tcosobi or Jay kiva, roof timbers of Tcosobi or Jay kiva, roof beams of |
120 |
Tebowúki, an early pueblo of the fire people of Tusayan Tebowúki, an early pueblo of the fire people from Tusayan |
20 |
Tebugkihu or fire-house, description of Tebugkihu or firehouse, description of |
57 |
fragments of passage-wall at fragments of passage wall at |
181 |
Terraced doorways | 190-191 |
Terraced gardens | 217 |
Terraced roofs of Tusayan, names of Terraced roofs of Tusayan, names of |
104 |
Terrace cooking-pits and fireplaces Outdoor cooking pits and fireplaces |
174-177 |
Terrace rooms, half open, not seen in ancient pueblos Terrace rooms, partly open, were not found in ancient pueblos. |
187 |
Terraces, Sichumovi form of | 62 |
Oraibi, formed by natural causes Oraibi, created by natural forces |
76 |
Zuñi | 97, 98, 144 |
ancient pueblos, how reached ancient pueblos, how to reach |
156 |
Tusayan names of | 223 |
Tusayan, order of settlement of, by various peoples Tusayan, the order of settlement by different groups of people |
29 |
Tesuque, a Tewa pueblo | 37 |
Tetsógi. See Tesuque. | |
Tewa conflict with the Ute | 36 |
Tewa, language of the | 37 |
Tewa. See Hano. | |
Timbers for roof, kind used in kiva-building Timbers for the roof, the type used in building kivas |
19 |
Time for planting and harvesting, how determined in Zuñi Time for planting and harvesting, how crucial in Zuñi |
148 |
Tiponi of Tusayan explained | 131 |
Topography, houses of Walpi constructed to conform to Topography, houses of Walpi built to fit |
64 |
of Shupaulovi | 71 |
Tradition, historical value of Cultural heritage value of |
15 |
Tradition, Tusayan | 16-41 |
Hano | 35 |
regarding Hano and Tusayan languages about Hano and Tusayan languages |
36 |
concerning Payupki pueblo | 40 |
concerning occupancy of Old Mashongnavi about the occupancy of Old Mashongnavi |
47-48 |
of foundation of Walpi | 63 |
concerning circular kivas | 135 |
Zuñi concerning stone-close | 92-193 |
concerning early occupancy of former pueblos by existing tribes concerning the early occupation of former pueblos by current tribes |
225 |
Traditionary gentes of Tusayan, list of Traditionally, people of Tusayan, list of |
38 |
Trails, Walpi | 65, 66 |
Tâaaiyalana | 89 |
Transoms over pueblo doorways | 187-189 |
Transportation to Walpi mesa, Indian method Transportation to Walpi Mesa, Indian Method |
66 |
Trapdoors, Sichumovi | 63 |
kivas, no means of fastening kivas, no way to secure |
113 |
frames furnished with hand-holds frames with hand grips |
192 |
Tupubi defined | 176 |
Túpkabi. See Canyon de Chelly. Túpkabi. Check out Canyon de Chelly. |
|
Tusayan, survey of | 15 |
traditional history of | 16-41 |
ruins and inhabited villages of ruins and live villages of |
42-79 |
house-building rites | 100-104 |
houses of, owned by women | 101 |
kivas in | 111-137 |
list of kivas of | 136 |
Tusayan and Cibola architecture, compared by constructional details Tusayan and Cibola architecture, compared by construction details |
100-223 |
details of | 137-223 |
Tusayan. See Hopituh. | |
Tuwahlki, or watch-house | 217 |
Tuwii. See Santo Domingo | 30 |
Twigs, use of, in roof construction Twigs, used for roofing |
150 |
U | |
Ute, conflict with, by the Tewa of Hano Ute, conflict with, by the Tewa of Hano |
36 |
inroads of, upon Tusayan | 25, 26, 35 |
V | |
Vargas, Don Diego, visit to Tusayan of Vargas, Don Diego, visit to Tusayan of |
35 |
Vocabulary of Tusayan architectural terms Tusayan architectural vocabulary |
220-223 |
W | |
Walls, how indicated on plans of ruins Walls, as shown on the plans of the ruins |
45 |
defensive, at Bat House | 52 |
construction of, in Moen-kopi ruins construction at Moen-kopi ruins |
53 |
curved, instances of | 54 |
showing precision of workmanship demonstrating craftsmanship precision |
54 |
dimensions in Tâaaiyalana mesa dimensions in Tâaaiyalana table |
90 |
original height of, indicated by débris original height of, indicated by debris |
90 |
thickness of, in modern Tusayan thickness of, in contemporary Tusayan |
102 |
paintings on, in Tusayan kiva paintings in Tusayan kiva |
131 |
pueblo, mode of construction of pueblo, building style of |
137-148 |
copings of | 139, 151, 152 |
Walls, strength of | 144 |
weakness of, in Zuñi | 182 |
of gardens | 215 |
Walpi, settlement of Bear people at Walpi, a settlement of the Bear people at |
21, 27 |
Spanish mission established at Spanish mission set up at |
22 |
construction of, by the Snake people construction of, by the Snake people |
23 |
dispute of, with the Sikyatki dispute with the Sikyatki |
24 |
settlement of the Asa at | 30, 31 |
abandoned by Bear, Lizard, Asa, and Badger peoples abandoned by Bear, Lizard, Asa, and Badger people |
31 |
description of | 63-66 |
court-surrounded kiva of | 114 |
kivas of | 119, 136 |
upper story partitions of, supported by beams upper story partitions of, supported by beams |
144 |
use of large stone blocks in garden walls of use of large stone blocks in garden walls of |
47 |
cooking pit at | 176, 177 |
south passageway of, described south passageway of, described |
181 |
Walpi people, attack of Awatubi by the Walpi people, attack on Awatubi by the |
34 |
affray between the Oraibi and affray between the Oraibi and |
35 |
trouble between the Hano and trouble between the Hano and |
37 |
various pueblos formerly occupied by the various towns that were previously occupied by the |
46, 47 |
Warp-sticks, mode of supporting Warp sticks, support method |
133 |
Water, method of carrying, at Walpi Water, method of carrying, at Walpi |
65 |
Water family, last to settle at Tusayan Water family, the last to settle in Tusayan |
29 |
migration legend of | 31 |
Water jars used in chimney construction Water jars used in chimney construction |
180 |
Water supply, Cibola | 80 |
Ketchipauan | 82, 83 |
Tâaaiyalana dwellings | 90, 91 |
Kin-tiel | 92 |
Zuñi | 97 |
Water vessels, forms of | 109 |
Wattling or lathing of kiva walls Wattling or lathing of kiva walls |
126 |
Weaving appliances | 212 |
Wejegi pueblo, loop-holes in | 198 |
Well or reservoir of Zuñi | 97 |
Whitewash on outer walls of Shumopavi Whitewash on the outside walls of Shumopavi |
73-74 |
on Mashongnavi room | 109 |
how made and applied in Zuñi how made and used in Zuñi |
145 |
on house walls | 145 |
used for coating doors | 186 |
Wíksrun people, settlement in Tusayan of the Wíksrun people, settlement in Tusayan of the |
27 |
Willow wands used in roof construction Willow branches used in building roofs |
150 |
Window, doorway and chimney in one Window, door, and chimney all in one |
121 |
Windows of various kinds described Describing different types of windows |
194, 201 |
Wings constructed in court of Pueblo Bonito Wings built in the courtyard of Pueblo Bonito |
70 |
Women, house owners at Tusayan Homeowners in Tusayan |
101 |
work of, in Tusayan house-building work of, in Tusayan construction |
101, 102 |
roof-building performed by | 102 |
work of, in kiva-building | 129 |
when admitted to kivas | 134 |
societies of, and kivas for, in Tusayan societies and kivas in Tusayan |
134 |
Wood, kinds of, used in Tusayan construction Wood, types of, used in Tusayan construction |
102 |
Wood rack of pueblos described Wood rack of pueblos depicted |
103 |
Wood-working, how performed | 184 |
Wooden doors not found in pre-Columbian ruins Wooden doors are not found in pre-Columbian ruins. |
184 |
Wooden features of pueblo windows Pueblo window wood accents |
196 |
Woolen mill established by Mormons at Moen-kopi Wool mill set up by Mormons at Moen-kopi |
78 |
Workshop, use of the kiva, as a Workshop, use of the kiva, as a |
129, 133 |
Y | |
Yeso used for interior whitewash Gypsum used for interior whitewash |
74 |
Yucca, use of, in lathing | 127 |
Yucca fiber sandals from Canyon de Chelly Yucca fiber sandals from Canyon de Chelly |
133 |
Z | |
Zuñi, survey of pueblo of | 14 |
arrival of the Asanyumu at | 30 |
portion of site of, formerly occupied by Halona portion of site of, formerly occupied by Halona |
88 |
tradition as to occupancy of Kin-tiel by the tradition regarding the occupancy of Kin-tiel by the |
92 |
plans and descriptions of villages of plans and descriptions of villages of |
94-99 |
description of pueblo of | 97-99 |
See Cibola. |
Transcriber’s Notes on the Illustrations
Bureau of Ethnology articles rarely included artist credits, but some of the drawings are signed:
Bureau of Ethnology articles rarely included artist credits, but a few of the drawings have signatures:
Henry Hobart Nichols (1869-1962) was one of the Smithsonian’s stable of artists. These drawings would have been some of his earliest work. The “fil.” in one signature distinguishes him from his father, the engraver H. Hobart Nichols (1838-1886), whose signature also appears in at least one Bureau of Ethnology publication.
Henry Hobart Nichols (1869-1962) was one of the artists affiliated with the Smithsonian. These drawings are likely some of his earliest work. The “fil.” in one signature sets him apart from his father, the engraver H. Hobart Nichols (1838-1886), whose signature is also found in at least one Bureau of Ethnology publication.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!