This is a modern-English version of Chapters from My Autobiography, originally written by Twain, Mark.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY
By
MARK TWAIN
Prefatory Note.—Mr. Clemens began to write his autobiography many years ago, and he continues to add to it day by day. It was his original intention to permit no publication of his memoirs until after his death; but, after leaving "Pier No. 70," he concluded that a considerable portion might now suitably be given to the public. It is that portion, garnered from the quarter-million of words already written, which will appear in this Review during the coming year. No part of the autobiography will be published in book form during the lifetime of the author.—Editor N. A. R.
Prefatory Note.—Mr. Clemens began writing his autobiography a long time ago and adds to it every day. He originally intended to keep his memoirs private until after his death; however, after leaving "Pier No. 70," he decided that a substantial portion could now be shared with the public. It’s that portion, taken from the quarter-million words he has already written, that will be featured in this Review over the next year. No part of the autobiography will be published in book form while the author is still alive.—Editor N. A. R.
CONTENTS
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—I.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—II.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—III.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—IV.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—V.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—VI.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—VII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—VIII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—IX.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—X.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XI.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XIII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XIV.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XV.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XVI.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XVII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XVIII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XIX.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XX.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXI.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXIII.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXIV.
- CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXV.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DXCVIII.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1906
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—I.[1]
BY MARK TWAIN.
INTRODUCTION.
I intend that this autobiography shall become a model for all future autobiographies when it is published, after my death, and I also intend that it shall be read and admired a good many centuries because of its form and method—a form and method whereby the past and the present are constantly brought face to face, resulting in contrasts which newly fire up the interest all along, like contact of flint with steel. Moreover, this autobiography of mine does not select from my life its showy episodes, but deals mainly in the common experiences which go to make up the life of the average human being, because these episodes are of[Pg 322] a sort which he is familiar with in his own life, and in which he sees his own life reflected and set down in print. The usual, conventional autobiographer seems to particularly hunt out those occasions in his career when he came into contact with celebrated persons, whereas his contacts with the uncelebrated were just as interesting to him, and would be to his reader, and were vastly more numerous than his collisions with the famous.
I plan for this autobiography to serve as a model for all future autobiographies once it’s published after my death, and I hope it will be read and appreciated for many centuries due to its style and approach—a style and approach that consistently brings the past and present together, creating contrasts that ignite interest like the spark of flint against steel. Additionally, this autobiography doesn’t just highlight the flashy moments of my life; instead, it focuses on the everyday experiences that make up the life of an average person, as these moments are relatable and allow readers to see their own lives reflected in print. The typical autobiographer often seeks out those moments in their career when they interacted with famous people, but their encounters with everyday individuals were just as fascinating—and certainly more numerous—than their interactions with the well-known.
Howells was here yesterday afternoon, and I told him the whole scheme of this autobiography and its apparently systemless system—only apparently systemless, for it is not really that. It is a deliberate system, and the law of the system is that I shall talk about the matter which for the moment interests me, and cast it aside and talk about something else the moment its interest for me is exhausted. It is a system which follows no charted course and is not going to follow any such course. It is a system which is a complete and purposed jumble—a course which begins nowhere, follows no specified route, and can never reach an end while I am alive, for the reason that, if I should talk to the stenographer two hours a day for a hundred years, I should still never be able to set down a tenth part of the things which have interested me in my lifetime. I told Howells that this autobiography of mine would live a couple of thousand years, without any effort, and would then take a fresh start and live the rest of the time.
Howells was here yesterday afternoon, and I explained the whole idea behind this autobiography and its seemingly random structure—only seemingly random, because it’s not really that. It’s a deliberate system, and the rule of the system is that I’ll talk about whatever interests me at the moment, then move on to something else as soon as my interest in it runs out. It’s a system that doesn’t follow a predetermined path and isn’t going to follow one. It’s a total and intentional mess—a journey that starts nowhere, doesn't follow a set route, and can never reach an end while I’m alive. The reason is that even if I talked to the stenographer two hours a day for a hundred years, I still wouldn’t be able to cover even a tenth of the things that have fascinated me in my life. I told Howells that my autobiography would last for a couple of thousand years without any effort, and then it would take a fresh start and continue on.
He said he believed it would, and asked me if I meant to make a library of it.
He said he thought it would, and asked me if I planned to turn it into a library.
I said that that was my design; but that, if I should live long enough, the set of volumes could not be contained merely in a city, it would require a State, and that there would not be any multi-billionaire alive, perhaps, at any time during its existence who would be able to buy a full set, except on the instalment plan.
I mentioned that this was my plan; however, if I lived long enough, the collection of volumes wouldn’t fit just in a city, it would need an entire state, and there probably wouldn’t be any billionaire around who could afford to buy a complete set, except through installments.
Howells applauded, and was full of praises and endorsement, which was wise in him and judicious. If he had manifested a different spirit, I would have thrown him out of the window. I like criticism, but it must be my way.
Howells clapped and showered praises and support, which was smart and thoughtful of him. If he had shown a different attitude, I would’ve thrown him out the window. I appreciate criticism, but it has to be on my terms.
I.
Back of the Virginia Clemenses is a dim procession of ancestors stretching back to Noah's time. According to tradition, some of them were pirates and slavers in Elizabeth's time. But this[Pg 323] is no discredit to them, for so were Drake and Hawkins and the others. It was a respectable trade, then, and monarchs were partners in it. In my time I have had desires to be a pirate myself. The reader—if he will look deep down in his secret heart, will find—but never mind what he will find there; I am not writing his Autobiography, but mine. Later, according to tradition, one of the procession was Ambassador to Spain in the time of James I, or of Charles I, and married there and sent down a strain of Spanish blood to warm us up. Also, according to tradition, this one or another—Geoffrey Clement, by name—helped to sentence Charles to death.
The Virginia Clemenses have a long line of ancestors reaching back to the time of Noah. According to tradition, some of them were pirates and slave traders during Elizabeth's reign. But this[Pg 323] doesn’t tarnish their reputation, since figures like Drake and Hawkins were also in that business. It was a respectable trade back then, and even royalty were involved. I've had thoughts of becoming a pirate myself. If the reader looks deeply into their secret heart, they will find—but let's not dwell on that; I'm not writing their autobiography, but mine. Later on, according to tradition, one of these ancestors served as Ambassador to Spain during the reign of James I or Charles I, married there, and introduced a bit of Spanish heritage into our family. Also, according to tradition, this person—Geoffrey Clement, to be specific—played a role in sentencing Charles to death.
I have not examined into these traditions myself, partly because I was indolent, and partly because I was so busy polishing up this end of the line and trying to make it showy; but the other Clemenses claim that they have made the examination and that it stood the test. Therefore I have always taken for granted that I did help Charles out of his troubles, by ancestral proxy. My instincts have persuaded me, too. Whenever we have a strong and persistent and ineradicable instinct, we may be sure that it is not original with us, but inherited—inherited from away back, and hardened and perfected by the petrifying influence of time. Now I have been always and unchangingly bitter against Charles, and I am quite certain that this feeling trickled down to me through the veins of my forebears from the heart of that judge; for it is not my disposition to be bitter against people on my own personal account I am not bitter against Jeffreys. I ought to be, but I am not. It indicates that my ancestors of James II's time were indifferent to him; I do not know why; I never could make it out; but that is what it indicates. And I have always felt friendly toward Satan. Of course that is ancestral; it must be in the blood, for I could not have originated it.
I haven't looked into these traditions myself, partly because I was lazy and partly because I was too busy trying to make this part stand out and look impressive. However, the other Clemenses say they've checked it out and that it held up under scrutiny. So, I've always assumed that I helped Charles through my ancestors. My instincts have felt that way too. Whenever we have a strong, persistent, and deep-seated instinct, we can be sure that it isn't something we've come up with ourselves, but something we've inherited—passed down from long ago, shaped and refined by the passage of time. I've always felt a constant bitterness towards Charles, and I'm sure that this feeling has flowed down to me through my ancestors from that judge's heart; it's not in my nature to be bitter towards people for my own reasons. I'm not bitter towards Jeffreys. I probably should be, but I'm not. This suggests that my ancestors from the time of James II didn’t care about him; I don’t know why; I could never figure it out; but that’s what it implies. And I've always felt a certain kinship with Satan. Of course, that’s inherited; it must be in my blood, because I couldn’t have come up with that on my own.
... And so, by the testimony of instinct, backed by the assertions of Clemenses who said they had examined the records, I have always been obliged to believe that Geoffrey Clement the martyr-maker was an ancestor of mine, and to regard him with favor, and in fact pride. This has not had a good effect upon me, for it has made me vain, and that is a fault. It has made me set myself above people who were less fortunate in their ancestry than I, and has moved me to take them down a peg, upon occasion, and say things to them which hurt them before company.
... So, based on my instincts and what Clemenses claimed about reviewing the records, I've always felt like Geoffrey Clement, the martyr-maker, was one of my ancestors, and I've looked up to him with admiration and even pride. However, this has not been beneficial for me, as it has made me vain, which is a flaw. It's led me to see myself as better than those who don't have as illustrious a background as I do, and I've sometimes felt compelled to put them in their place and say things that hurt them in front of others.
[Pg 324]A case of the kind happened in Berlin several years ago. William Walter Phelps was our Minister at the Emperor's Court, then, and one evening he had me to dinner to meet Count S., a cabinet minister. This nobleman was of long and illustrious descent. Of course I wanted to let out the fact that I had some ancestors, too; but I did not want to pull them out of their graves by the ears, and I never could seem to get the chance to work them in in a way that would look sufficiently casual. I suppose Phelps was in the same difficulty. In fact he looked distraught, now and then—just as a person looks who wants to uncover an ancestor purely by accident, and cannot think of a way that will seem accidental enough. But at last, after dinner, he made a try. He took us about his drawing-room, showing us the pictures, and finally stopped before a rude and ancient engraving. It was a picture of the court that tried Charles I. There was a pyramid of judges in Puritan slouch hats, and below them three bare-headed secretaries seated at a table. Mr. Phelps put his finger upon one of the three, and said with exulting indifference—
[Pg 324] A situation like this happened in Berlin a few years back. William Walter Phelps was our Minister at the Emperor's Court at the time, and one evening he invited me to dinner to meet Count S., a cabinet minister. This nobleman came from a long and distinguished lineage. Naturally, I wanted to mention my own ancestors, but I didn’t want to drag them up from their graves, and I could never seem to find the right moment to bring them up casually. I guess Phelps struggled with the same issue. In fact, he looked a bit frazzled at times—much like someone who wants to casually reveal their ancestor but can’t figure out how to do it in a way that seems natural. Finally, after dinner, he made an attempt. He took us around his drawing-room, showing off the artwork, and eventually stopped in front of a crude and ancient engraving. It depicted the court that tried Charles I. There was a pyramid of judges wearing Puritan slouch hats, and below them three bare-headed secretaries sitting at a table. Mr. Phelps pointed to one of the three and casually said—
"An ancestor of mine."
"One of my ancestors."
I put my finger on a judge, and retorted with scathing languidness—
I pointed at a judge and replied with dismissive sarcasm—
"Ancestor of mine. But it is a small matter. I have others."
"An ancestor of mine. But it's a minor issue. I have others."
It was not noble in me to do it. I have always regretted it since. But it landed him. I wonder how he felt? However, it made no difference in our friendship, which shows that he was fine and high, notwithstanding the humbleness of his origin. And it was also creditable in me, too, that I could overlook it. I made no change in my bearing toward him, but always treated him as an equal.
It wasn't noble of me to do that. I've always regretted it since. But it worked out for him. I wonder how he felt about it? Still, it didn't change our friendship, which shows he was good and respectable, despite coming from humble beginnings. It also says something about me that I could look past it. I didn't change how I acted around him; I always treated him as an equal.
But it was a hard night for me in one way. Mr. Phelps thought I was the guest of honor, and so did Count S.; but I didn't, for there was nothing in my invitation to indicate it. It was just a friendly offhand note, on a card. By the time dinner was announced Phelps was himself in a state of doubt. Something had to be done; and it was not a handy time for explanations. He tried to get me to go out with him, but I held back; then he tried S., and he also declined. There was another guest, but there was no trouble about him. We finally went out in a pile. There was a decorous plunge for seats, and I got the one at Mr. Phelps's left, the Count captured the one facing[Pg 325] Phelps, and the other guest had to take the place of honor, since he could not help himself. We returned to the drawing-room in the original disorder. I had new shoes on, and they were tight. At eleven I was privately crying; I couldn't help it, the pain was so cruel. Conversation had been dead for an hour. S. had been due at the bedside of a dying official ever since half past nine. At last we all rose by one blessed impulse and went down to the street door without explanations—in a pile, and no precedence; and so, parted.
But it was a tough night for me in one way. Mr. Phelps thought I was the guest of honor, and so did Count S.; but I didn’t, because my invitation didn’t say anything about it. It was just a casual note on a card. By the time dinner was announced, Phelps was unsure himself. Something needed to be done, but it wasn’t the best time for explanations. He tried to get me to go out with him, but I hesitated; then he asked S., and he also declined. There was another guest, but there were no issues with him. We eventually went out together. Everyone made a polite rush for seats, and I ended up sitting to the left of Mr. Phelps, while the Count took the seat facing[Pg 325] Phelps, leaving the other guest in the place of honor, since he had no choice. We returned to the drawing-room in the same disarray. I had on new shoes, and they were tight. By eleven, I was quietly crying; I couldn’t help it, the pain was unbearable. The conversation had been dead for an hour. S. had been expected at the bedside of a dying official since half past nine. Finally, we all got up in a collective motion and headed down to the street door without saying anything—in a group, with no order; and then we parted ways.
The evening had its defects; still, I got my ancestor in, and was satisfied.
The evening had its flaws; still, I managed to get my ancestor in, and I was satisfied.
Among the Virginian Clemenses were Jere. (already mentioned), and Sherrard. Jere. Clemens had a wide reputation as a good pistol-shot, and once it enabled him to get on the friendly side of some drummers when they wouldn't have paid any attention to mere smooth words and arguments. He was out stumping the State at the time. The drummers were grouped in front of the stand, and had been hired by the opposition to drum while he made his speech. When he was ready to begin, he got out his revolver and laid it before him, and said in his soft, silky way—
Among the Virginian Clemenses were Jere. (already mentioned) and Sherrard. Jere. Clemens was well-known for being a great shot, and this came in handy when he needed to win over some drummers who wouldn't have listened to just smooth talk and arguments. He was out campaigning in the state at that time. The drummers were gathered in front of the stand, hired by the opposition to drum while he gave his speech. When he was ready to start, he pulled out his revolver and set it down in front of him, saying in his gentle, smooth manner—
"I do not wish to hurt anybody, and shall try not to; but I have got just a bullet apiece for those six drums, and if you should want to play on them, don't stand behind them."
"I don’t want to hurt anyone, and I’ll do my best not to; but I've got just one bullet for each of those six drums, so if you decide to play on them, don’t stand behind them."
Sherrard Clemens was a Republican Congressman from West Virginia in the war days, and then went out to St. Louis, where the James Clemens branch lived, and still lives, and there he became a warm rebel. This was after the war. At the time that he was a Republican I was a rebel; but by the time he had become a rebel I was become (temporarily) a Republican. The Clemenses have always done the best they could to keep the political balances level, no matter how much it might inconvenience them. I did not know what had become of Sherrard Clemens; but once I introduced Senator Hawley to a Republican mass meeting in New England, and then I got a bitter letter from Sherrard from St. Louis. He said that the Republicans of the North—no, the "mudsills of the North"—had swept away the old aristocracy of the South with fire and sword, and it ill became me, an aristocrat by blood, to train with that kind of swine. Did I forget that I was a Lambton?
Sherrard Clemens was a Republican Congressman from West Virginia during the war, and later moved to St. Louis, where the James Clemens family lived and still lives. There, he became a passionate rebel. This was after the war. Back when he was a Republican, I was a rebel; but by the time he became a rebel, I had temporarily switched to being a Republican. The Clemenses have always tried their best to keep the political balance stable, regardless of how inconvenient it might be for them. I didn’t know what happened to Sherrard Clemens; however, I once introduced Senator Hawley at a Republican rally in New England and then received a harsh letter from Sherrard in St. Louis. He said that the Republicans of the North—no, the "mudsills of the North"—had destroyed the old aristocracy of the South with fire and sword, and it was inappropriate for me, an aristocrat by birth, to associate with that kind of people. Did I forget that I was a Lambton?
[Pg 326]That was a reference to my mother's side of the house. As I have already said, she was a Lambton—Lambton with a p, for some of the American Lamptons could not spell very well in early times, and so the name suffered at their hands. She was a native of Kentucky, and married my father in Lexington in 1823, when she was twenty years old and he twenty-four. Neither of them had an overplus of property. She brought him two or three negroes, but nothing else, I think. They removed to the remote and secluded village of Jamestown, in the mountain solitudes of east Tennessee. There their first crop of children was born, but as I was of a later vintage I do not remember anything about it. I was postponed—postponed to Missouri. Missouri was an unknown new State and needed attractions.
[Pg 326]That was a reference to my mother's family. As I mentioned earlier, she was a Lambton—Lambton with a "p," since some of the American Lamptons had trouble spelling correctly in the early days, and the name got mixed up because of that. She was from Kentucky and married my father in Lexington in 1823 when she was twenty and he was twenty-four. Neither of them had much in the way of possessions. She brought him two or three enslaved people, but nothing else, as far as I know. They moved to the remote and quiet village of Jamestown, tucked away in the mountains of east Tennessee. Their first group of children was born there, but since I came along later, I don’t remember anything about that. I was postponed—postponed to Missouri. Missouri was a new and uncharted state that needed some appealing features.
I think that my eldest brother, Orion, my sisters Pamela and Margaret, and my brother Benjamin were born in Jamestown. There may have been others, but as to that I am not sure. It was a great lift for that little village to have my parents come there. It was hoped that they would stay, so that it would become a city. It was supposed that they would stay. And so there was a boom; but by and by they went away, and prices went down, and it was many years before Jamestown got another start. I have written about Jamestown in the "Gilded Age," a book of mine, but it was from hearsay, not from personal knowledge. My father left a fine estate behind him in the region round about Jamestown—75,000 acres.[2] When he died in 1847 he had owned it about twenty years. The taxes were almost nothing (five dollars a year for the whole), and he had always paid them regularly and kept his title perfect. He had always said that the land would not become valuable in his time, but that it would be a commodious provision for his children some day. It contained coal, copper, iron and timber, and he said that in the course of time railways would pierce to that region, and then the property would be property in fact as well as in name. It also produced a wild grape of a promising sort. He had sent some samples to Nicholas Longworth, of Cincinnati, to get his judgment upon them, and Mr. Longworth had said that they would make as good wine as his Catawbas. The land contained all these riches; and also oil, but my father did not know that, and of course in those early days he would have cared nothing about it if he had known it. The oil[Pg 327] was not discovered until about 1895. I wish I owned a couple of acres of the land now. In which case I would not be writing Autobiographies for a living. My father's dying charge was, "Cling to the land and wait; let nothing beguile it away from you." My mother's favorite cousin, James Lampton, who figures in the "Gilded Age" as "Colonel Sellers," always said of that land—and said it with blazing enthusiasm, too,—"There's millions in it—millions!" It is true that he always said that about everything—and was always mistaken, too; but this time he was right; which shows that a man who goes around with a prophecy-gun ought never to get discouraged; if he will keep up his heart and fire at everything he sees, he is bound to hit something by and by.
I think my older brother, Orion, my sisters Pamela and Margaret, and my brother Benjamin were born in Jamestown. There might have been others, but I'm not sure. It was a big deal for that small village when my parents moved there. Everyone hoped they would stay so it could become a city. People believed they would stay. So for a while, there was a boom, but eventually they left, prices dropped, and it took many years before Jamestown got another chance. I've written about Jamestown in my book “The Gilded Age,” but it was based on what I heard, not from my own experience. My father left behind a large estate around Jamestown—75,000 acres.[2] When he died in 1847, he had owned it for about twenty years. The taxes were almost nothing (five dollars a year for the whole thing), and he always paid them on time and kept his title clean. He often said that the land wouldn't be valuable in his lifetime, but it would be a great resource for his children someday. It had coal, copper, iron, and timber, and he believed that eventually, railways would reach that area, making the property valuable in reality as well as in name. It also produced a promising type of wild grape. He sent some samples to Nicholas Longworth in Cincinnati to get his opinion, and Mr. Longworth said they would make wine as good as his Catawbas. The land had all these riches; it also had oil, but my father didn’t know that, and of course, he wouldn’t have cared about it back then if he had known. The oil[Pg 327] wasn’t discovered until around 1895. I wish I owned a couple of acres of that land now. If I did, I wouldn’t be writing autobiographies for a living. My father’s last words were, “Hold on to the land and wait; don’t let anything trick you into giving it up.” My mother’s favorite cousin, James Lampton, who appears in “The Gilded Age” as “Colonel Sellers,” always said about that land—he said it with so much enthusiasm—“There’s millions in it—millions!” It’s true he said that about everything and was usually wrong too; but this time he was right, which shows that a person who goes around claiming things should never get discouraged; if they keep their spirits up and aim for everything they see, they’re bound to hit on something eventually.
Many persons regarded "Colonel Sellers" as a fiction, an invention, an extravagant impossibility, and did me the honor to call him a "creation"; but they were mistaken. I merely put him on paper as he was; he was not a person who could be exaggerated. The incidents which looked most extravagant, both in the book and on the stage, were not inventions of mine but were facts of his life; and I was present when they were developed. John T. Raymond's audiences used to come near to dying with laughter over the turnip-eating scene; but, extravagant as the scene was, it was faithful to the facts, in all its absurd details. The thing happened in Lampton's own house, and I was present. In fact I was myself the guest who ate the turnips. In the hands of a great actor that piteous scene would have dimmed any manly spectator's eyes with tears, and racked his ribs apart with laughter at the same time. But Raymond was great in humorous portrayal only. In that he was superb, he was wonderful—in a word, great; in all things else he was a pigmy of the pigmies.
Many people viewed "Colonel Sellers" as a fictional character, an invention, an outrageous impossibility, and they even honored me by calling him a "creation"; but they were wrong. I simply wrote him down as he was; he wasn't someone who could be exaggerated. The situations that seemed the most ridiculous, both in the book and on stage, weren't made up by me but were actual events from his life; I witnessed them firsthand. Audiences at John T. Raymond's shows would nearly die from laughter over the turnip-eating scene; but, as outrageous as that scene was, it accurately reflected the truth, with all its ridiculous details. It happened in Lampton's own home, and I was there. In fact, I was the guest who ate the turnips. If a great actor had performed that heartbreaking scene, it would have brought tears to any man's eyes while also causing uncontrollable laughter. However, Raymond was only exceptional in his comedic representation. In that, he was outstanding, truly remarkable—in short, great; in everything else, he was a small fry among small fries.
The real Colonel Sellers, as I knew him in James Lampton, was a pathetic and beautiful spirit, a manly man, a straight and honorable man, a man with a big, foolish, unselfish heart in his bosom, a man born to be loved; and he was loved by all his friends, and by his family worshipped. It is the right word. To them he was but little less than a god. The real Colonel Sellers was never on the stage. Only half of him was there. Raymond could not play the other half of him; it was above his level. That half was made up of qualities of which Raymond was wholly destitute.[Pg 328] For Raymond was not a manly man, he was not an honorable man nor an honest one, he was empty and selfish and vulgar and ignorant and silly, and there was a vacancy in him where his heart should have been. There was only one man who could have played the whole of Colonel Sellers, and that was Frank Mayo.[3]
The real Colonel Sellers, as I knew him through James Lampton, was a sad yet beautiful spirit, a truly manly man, a straightforward and honorable person, a guy with a big, foolish, selfless heart in his chest, someone born to be loved; and he was loved by all his friends and practically worshipped by his family. It’s the right word. To them, he was nearly a god. The real Colonel Sellers was never fully on stage. Only part of him was represented there. Raymond couldn’t capture the other part of him; it was beyond his ability. That part consisted of qualities that Raymond completely lacked. For Raymond was not a manly man, he was not honorable or honest, he was empty, selfish, vulgar, ignorant, and foolish, and there was a void in him where his heart should have been. There was only one person who could portray the entire Colonel Sellers, and that was Frank Mayo.[Pg 328]
It is a world of surprises. They fall, too, where one is least expecting them. When I introduced Sellers into the book, Charles Dudley Warner, who was writing the story with me, proposed a change of Seller's Christian name. Ten years before, in a remote corner of the West, he had come across a man named Eschol Sellers, and he thought that Eschol was just the right and fitting name for our Sellers, since it was odd and quaint and all that. I liked the idea, but I said that that man might turn up and object. But Warner said it couldn't happen; that he was doubtless dead by this time, a man with a name like that couldn't live long; and be he dead or alive we must have the name, it was exactly the right one and we couldn't do without it. So the change was made. Warner's man was a farmer in a cheap and humble way. When the book had been out a week, a college-bred gentleman of courtly manners and ducal upholstery arrived in Hartford in a sultry state of mind and with a libel suit in his eye, and his name was Eschol Sellers! He had never heard of the other one, and had never been within a thousand miles of him. This damaged aristocrat's programme was quite definite and businesslike: the American Publishing Company must suppress the edition as far as printed, and change the name in the plates, or stand a suit for $10,000. He carried away the Company's promise and many apologies, and we changed the name back to Colonel Mulberry Sellers, in the plates. Apparently there is nothing that cannot happen. Even the existence of two unrelated men wearing the impossible name of Eschol Sellers is a possible thing.
It’s a world full of surprises. They come when you least expect them. When I added Sellers to the story, Charles Dudley Warner, who was co-writing with me, suggested a change to Sellers' first name. Ten years earlier, in a far-off part of the West, he had met a guy named Eschol Sellers, and he thought that Eschol would be the perfect name for our Sellers because it was unique and charming. I liked the idea but mentioned that the original guy might object. Warner insisted it was unlikely; he figured the man was probably dead by now, and a guy with a name like that probably wouldn’t live long anyway. Whether he was dead or alive, we needed that name; it was the perfect fit and we couldn’t do without it. So, we made the change. Warner's version of the character was a simple, working-class farmer. A week after the book was released, a well-educated gentleman with refined manners and an air of superiority showed up in Hartford, clearly upset and ready to sue. His name was Eschol Sellers! He had never heard of the other one and had never been close to him. This disgruntled aristocrat had a clear and practical agenda: the American Publishing Company needed to recall the printed copies and change the name in the plates, or face a lawsuit for $10,000. He left with the Company’s promise and various apologies, and we changed the name back to Colonel Mulberry Sellers in the plates. It seems like anything can happen. The existence of two unrelated men with the unusual name of Eschol Sellers is definitely possible.
James Lampton floated, all his days, in a tinted mist of magnificent dreams, and died at last without seeing one of them realized. I saw him last in 1884, when it had been twenty-six years since I ate the basin of raw turnips and washed them down with a bucket of water in his house. He was become old and white-headed, but he entered to me in the same old breezy[Pg 329] way of his earlier life, and he was all there, yet—not a detail wanting: the happy light in his eye, the abounding hope in his heart, the persuasive tongue, the miracle-breeding imagination—they were all there; and before I could turn around he was polishing up his Aladdin's lamp and flashing the secret riches of the world before me. I said to myself, "I did not overdraw him by a shade, I set him down as he was; and he is the same man to-day. Cable will recognize him." I asked him to excuse me a moment, and ran into the next room, which was Cable's; Cable and I were stumping the Union on a reading tour. I said—
James Lampton spent his whole life in a colored haze of amazing dreams and finally died without seeing any of them come true. I last saw him in 1884, twenty-six years after I had a bowl of raw turnips and washed them down with a bucket of water at his place. He had grown old and was white-haired, but he greeted me with the same breezy way he had in his earlier days; he was completely himself—every detail was intact: the joyful sparkle in his eyes, the overflowing hope in his heart, his charming speech, and his imagination that could create miracles—everything was there. Before I could even blink, he was polishing his Aladdin's lamp and revealing the world's hidden treasures to me. I thought to myself, "I didn’t exaggerate him at all; I described him just as he was, and he’s still the same man today. Cable will recognize him." I asked him to give me a moment and dashed into the next room, which was Cable's; Cable and I were traveling the Union on a reading tour. I said—
"I am going to leave your door open, so that you can listen. There is a man in there who is interesting."
"I’m going to leave your door open so you can listen. There’s a guy in there who is interesting."
I went back and asked Lampton what he was doing now. He began to tell me of a "small venture" he had begun in New Mexico through his son; "only a little thing—a mere trifle—partly to amuse my leisure, partly to keep my capital from lying idle, but mainly to develop the boy—develop the boy; fortune's wheel is ever revolving, he may have to work for his living some day—as strange things have happened in this world. But it's only a little thing—a mere trifle, as I said."
I went back and asked Lampton what he was up to now. He started telling me about a "small venture" he had launched in New Mexico through his son; "just a little thing—nothing major—partly just to keep me busy, partly to make sure my money isn’t sitting around doing nothing, but mostly to help the boy grow—help the boy grow; fortune's wheel keeps turning, and he might need to work for a living someday—as strange things have happened in this world. But it’s just a little thing—nothing major, like I said."
And so it was—as he began it. But under his deft hands it grew, and blossomed, and spread—oh, beyond imagination. At the end of half an hour he finished; finished with the remark, uttered in an adorably languid manner:
And so it was—as he started it. But under his skilled hands, it grew, blossomed, and spread—oh, beyond what anyone could imagine. After half an hour, he was done; done with the comment, said in a charmingly relaxed way:
"Yes, it is but a trifle, as things go nowadays—a bagatelle—but amusing. It passes the time. The boy thinks great things of it, but he is young, you know, and imaginative; lacks the experience which comes of handling large affairs, and which tempers the fancy and perfects the judgment. I suppose there's a couple of millions in it, possibly three, but not more, I think; still, for a boy, you know, just starting in life, it is not bad. I should not want him to make a fortune—let that come later. It could turn his head, at his time of life, and in many ways be a damage to him."
"Yes, it's just a small thing compared to what’s going on nowadays—just a little distraction—but it’s entertaining. It helps pass the time. The boy thinks it’s a big deal, but he’s young and imaginative; he lacks the experience that comes from dealing with significant matters, which helps balance his ideas and sharpen his judgment. I guess there’s a couple million in it, maybe three, but not more, I think; still, for a young person just starting out in life, it’s not bad. I wouldn’t want him to make a fortune just yet—let that come later. It could go to his head at his age and could be harmful to him in many ways."
Then he said something about his having left his pocketbook lying on the table in the main drawing-room at home, and about its being after banking hours, now, and—
Then he mentioned that he had left his wallet on the table in the main living room at home, and it was after banking hours now, and—
I stopped him, there, and begged him to honor Cable and me by being our guest at the lecture—with as many friends as might be willing to do us the like honor. He accepted. And he[Pg 330] thanked me as a prince might who had granted us a grace. The reason I stopped his speech about the tickets was because I saw that he was going to ask me to furnish them to him and let him pay next day; and I knew that if he made the debt he would pay it if he had to pawn his clothes. After a little further chat he shook hands heartily and affectionately, and took his leave. Cable put his head in at the door, and said—
I stopped him right there and asked him to honor Cable and me by being our guest at the lecture—along with as many friends as he wanted to bring. He agreed. And he[Pg 330] thanked me like a prince who had granted us a favor. I interrupted his talk about the tickets because I realized he was going to ask me to get them for him and let him pay me the next day; I knew that if he took on that debt, he would pay it back even if he had to sell his clothes. After a bit more chatting, he shook my hand warmly and left. Cable peeked in at the door and said—
"That was Colonel Sellers."
"That's Colonel Sellers."
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
FOOTNOTES:
[3] Raymond was playing "Colonel Sellers" in 1876 and along there. About twenty years later Mayo dramatized "Pudd'nhead Wilson" and played the title role delightfully.
[3] Raymond was playing "Colonel Sellers" in 1876 and continued doing so for some time. About twenty years later, Mayo adapted "Pudd'nhead Wilson" into a play and performed the title role wonderfully.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DXCIX.
SEPTEMBER 21, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—II.
BY MARK TWAIN.
II.
My experiences as an author began early in 1867. I came to New York from San Francisco in the first month of that year and presently Charles H. Webb, whom I had known in San Francisco as a reporter on The Bulletin, and afterward editor of The Californian, suggested that I publish a volume of sketches. I had but a slender reputation to publish it on, but I was charmed and excited by the suggestion and quite willing to venture it if some industrious person would save me the trouble of gathering the sketches together. I was loath to do it myself, for from the beginning of my sojourn in this world there was a persistent vacancy in me where the industry ought to be. ("Ought to was"[Pg 450] is better, perhaps, though the most of the authorities differ as to this.)
My journey as an author started in early 1867. I moved to New York from San Francisco in January of that year, and soon Charles H. Webb, who I had known in San Francisco as a reporter for The Bulletin and later as the editor of The Californian, suggested that I publish a book of sketches. I had a pretty slim reputation to back it up, but I was thrilled and excited by the idea and quite willing to take the leap if someone hard-working would help me organize the sketches. I was reluctant to do it myself because, from the start of my time here, I felt a consistent lack of drive where my work ethic should have been. ("Should have been" might be a better phrase, though most experts disagree on this.)
Webb said I had some reputation in the Atlantic States, but I knew quite well that it must be of a very attenuated sort. What there was of it rested upon the story of "The Jumping Frog." When Artemus Ward passed through California on a lecturing tour, in 1865 or '66, I told him the "Jumping Frog" story, in San Francisco, and he asked me to write it out and send it to his publisher, Carleton, in New York, to be used in padding out a small book which Artemus had prepared for the press and which needed some more stuffing to make it big enough for the price which was to be charged for it.
Webb mentioned that I had some reputation in the Atlantic States, but I knew it was pretty minimal. What little reputation I had came from the story of "The Jumping Frog." When Artemus Ward was traveling through California on a lecture tour in 1865 or '66, I shared the "Jumping Frog" story with him in San Francisco. He asked me to write it out and send it to his publisher, Carleton, in New York, so it could be included in a small book he was preparing for publication, which needed more content to justify the price they wanted to charge for it.
It reached Carleton in time, but he didn't think much of it, and was not willing to go to the typesetting expense of adding it to the book. He did not put it in the waste-basket, but made Henry Clapp a present of it, and Clapp used it to help out the funeral of his dying literary journal, The Saturday Press. "The Jumping Frog" appeared in the last number of that paper, was the most joyous feature of the obsequies, and was at once copied in the newspapers of America and England. It certainly had a wide celebrity, and it still had it at the time that I am speaking of—but I was aware that it was only the frog that was celebrated. It wasn't I. I was still an obscurity.
It got to Carleton on time, but he didn't think it was that important and didn't want to spend money on typesetting it for the book. He didn’t throw it away; instead, he gave it to Henry Clapp, who used it to support the fading literary journal, The Saturday Press. "The Jumping Frog" appeared in the last issue of that paper, became the most lively part of the farewell, and was quickly picked up by newspapers in America and England. It definitely gained a lot of attention, and it still had it at the time I’m talking about—but I knew that only the frog was famous. I wasn’t. I was still pretty unknown.
Webb undertook to collate the sketches. He performed this office, then handed the result to me, and I went to Carleton's establishment with it. I approached a clerk and he bent eagerly over the counter to inquire into my needs; but when he found that I had come to sell a book and not to buy one, his temperature fell sixty degrees, and the old-gold intrenchments in the roof of my mouth contracted three-quarters of an inch and my teeth fell out. I meekly asked the privilege of a word with Mr. Carleton, and was coldly informed that he was in his private office. Discouragements and difficulties followed, but after a while I got by the frontier and entered the holy of holies. Ah, now I remember how I managed it! Webb had made an appointment for me with Carleton; otherwise I never should have gotten over that frontier. Carleton rose and said brusquely and aggressively,
Webb took on the task of organizing the sketches. He completed this and then handed the results to me, and I went to Carleton's place with it. I approached a clerk, who leaned eagerly over the counter to see how he could help, but when he realized I was there to sell a book instead of buy one, his demeanor completely changed, and I felt like my hopes had plummeted. I politely asked to speak with Mr. Carleton, only to be told coldly that he was in his private office. Challenges and setbacks followed, but eventually, I got past the initial obstacles and entered the sanctum. Ah, now I recall how I succeeded! Webb had set up an appointment for me with Carleton; without that, I never would have made it past that initial barrier. Carleton got up and said curtly and confrontationally,
"Well, what can I do for you?"
"Well, what can I help you with?"
I reminded him that I was there by appointment to offer him my book for publication. He began to swell, and went on swell[Pg 451]ing and swelling and swelling until he had reached the dimensions of a god of about the second or third degree. Then the fountains of his great deep were broken up, and for two or three minutes I couldn't see him for the rain. It was words, only words, but they fell so densely that they darkened the atmosphere. Finally he made an imposing sweep with his right hand, which comprehended the whole room and said,
I reminded him that I was there by appointment to offer him my book for publication. He started to get puffed up, and kept on puffing up until he was as big as a second or third-degree god. Then he let loose, and for two or three minutes I couldn’t see him for the downpour. It was just words, but they came down so thickly that they clouded the air. Finally, he made a grand gesture with his right hand, taking in the entire room, and said,
"Books—look at those shelves! Every one of them is loaded with books that are waiting for publication. Do I want any more? Excuse me, I don't. Good morning."
"Books—check out those shelves! Each one is packed with books that are ready for publication. Do I want any more? No thanks, I'm good. Good morning."
Twenty-one years elapsed before I saw Carleton again. I was then sojourning with my family at the Schweitzerhof, in Luzerne. He called on me, shook hands cordially, and said at once, without any preliminaries,
Twenty-one years went by before I saw Carleton again. I was staying with my family at the Schweitzerhof in Lucerne. He came to visit me, shook my hand warmly, and immediately said, without any small talk,
"I am substantially an obscure person, but I have at least one distinction to my credit of such colossal dimensions that it entitles me to immortality—to wit: I refused a book of yours, and for this I stand without competitor as the prize ass of the nineteenth century."
"I’m mostly an unknown person, but there’s one noteworthy thing that gives me a kind of immortality: I turned down a book of yours, and because of that, I proudly hold the title of the biggest fool of the nineteenth century."
It was a most handsome apology, and I told him so, and said it was a long-delayed revenge but was sweeter to me than any other that could be devised; that during the lapsed twenty-one years I had in fancy taken his life several times every year, and always in new and increasingly cruel and inhuman ways, but that now I was pacified, appeased, happy, even jubilant; and that thenceforth I should hold him my true and valued friend and never kill him again.
It was a really impressive apology, and I told him that. I said it was a long-overdue revenge, but it felt sweeter to me than anything else I could think of. During those twenty-one years, I had imagined killing him several times each year, always in new and more brutal and cruel ways. But now I felt calm, satisfied, happy, even joyful; and from that point on, I would consider him my true and valued friend and never try to harm him again.
I reported my adventure to Webb, and he bravely said that not all the Carletons in the universe should defeat that book; he would publish it himself on a ten per cent. royalty. And so he did. He brought it out in blue and gold, and made a very pretty little book of it, I think he named it "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County, and Other Sketches," price $1.25. He made the plates and printed and bound the book through a job-printing house, and published it through the American News Company.
I told Webb about my adventure, and he confidently declared that not all the Carletons in the world could defeat that book; he would publish it himself with a ten percent royalty. And that’s exactly what he did. He released it in blue and gold, creating a really nice little book. I think he called it "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County, and Other Sketches," priced at $1.25. He created the plates and managed the printing and binding through a job-printing house, publishing it through the American News Company.
In June I sailed in the Quaker City Excursion. I returned in November, and in Washington found a letter from Elisha Bliss, of the American Publishing Company of Hartford, offering me five per cent. royalty on a book which should recount the adventures of the Excursion. In lieu of the royalty, I was offered the al[Pg 452]ternative of ten thousand dollars cash upon delivery of the manuscript. I consulted A. D. Richardson and he said "take the royalty." I followed his advice and closed with Bliss. By my contract I was to deliver the manuscript in July of 1868. I wrote the book in San Francisco and delivered the manuscript within contract time. Bliss provided a multitude of illustrations for the book, and then stopped work on it. The contract date for the issue went by, and there was no explanation of this. Time drifted along and still there was no explanation. I was lecturing all over the country; and about thirty times a day, on an average, I was trying to answer this conundrum:
In June, I took a trip on the Quaker City Excursion. When I got back in November, I found a letter from Elisha Bliss at the American Publishing Company in Hartford. He offered me a five percent royalty on a book that would tell the story of the Excursion. Instead of the royalty, he offered me the alternative of ten thousand dollars in cash when I delivered the manuscript. I talked to A. D. Richardson, and he advised me to "take the royalty." I took his advice and made a deal with Bliss. According to my contract, I was supposed to deliver the manuscript in July of 1868. I wrote the book in San Francisco and handed in the manuscript on time. Bliss arranged for a lot of illustrations for the book but then stopped working on it. The contract deadline for the release came and went without any explanation. Time passed, and still, there was no explanation. I was lecturing all over the country, and about thirty times a day, on average, I found myself trying to solve this mystery:
"When is your book coming out?"
"When is your book being released?"
I got tired of inventing new answers to that question, and by and by I got horribly tired of the question itself. Whoever asked it became my enemy at once, and I was usually almost eager to make that appear.
I got tired of coming up with new answers to that question, and eventually, I got really fed up with the question itself. Whoever asked it instantly became my enemy, and I often felt almost eager to show that.
As soon as I was free of the lecture-field I hastened to Hartford to make inquiries. Bliss said that the fault was not his; that he wanted to publish the book but the directors of his Company were staid old fossils and were afraid of it. They had examined the book, and the majority of them were of the opinion that there were places in it of a humorous character. Bliss said the house had never published a book that had a suspicion like that attaching to it, and that the directors were afraid that a departure of this kind would seriously injure the house's reputation; that he was tied hand and foot, and was not permitted to carry out his contract. One of the directors, a Mr. Drake—at least he was the remains of what had once been a Mr. Drake—invited me to take a ride with him in his buggy, and I went along. He was a pathetic old relic, and his ways and his talk were also pathetic. He had a delicate purpose in view and it took him some time to hearten himself sufficiently to carry it out, but at last he accomplished it. He explained the house's difficulty and distress, as Bliss had already explained it. Then he frankly threw himself and the house upon my mercy and begged me to take away "The Innocents Abroad" and release the concern from the contract. I said I wouldn't—and so ended the interview and the buggy excursion. Then I warned Bliss that he must get to work or I should make trouble. He acted upon the warning, and set up the book and I read the proofs. Then there was another long[Pg 453] wait and no explanation. At last toward the end of July (1869, I think), I lost patience and telegraphed Bliss that if the book was not on sale in twenty-four hours I should bring suit for damages.
As soon as I was out of the lecture, I rushed to Hartford to ask questions. Bliss claimed it wasn’t his fault; he wanted to publish the book, but the directors of his company were conservative old-timers who were scared of it. They had reviewed the book and most of them thought there were humorous parts in it. Bliss said the company had never published a book that had anything like that associated with it, and the directors worried that this kind of shift would seriously harm the company’s reputation. He felt completely stuck and wasn't allowed to fulfill his contract. One of the directors, a Mr. Drake—though he was more like a shadow of the Mr. Drake he once was—invited me for a ride in his buggy, and I went along. He was a sad old relic, and his mannerisms and speech were equally depressing. He had a specific goal in mind, and it took him a while to gather the courage to express it, but he finally did. He explained the company’s trouble and distress, just as Bliss had already done. Then he earnestly put himself and the company in my hands and asked me to take "The Innocents Abroad" away and free them from the contract. I said I wouldn’t—and that ended both the meeting and the buggy ride. Then I warned Bliss that he needed to get to work or I would create problems. He took my warning seriously, set up the book, and I read the proofs. After that, there was another long[Pg 453] wait with no explanation. Finally, toward the end of July (1869, I think), I lost my patience and sent a telegram to Bliss saying that if the book wasn’t on sale in twenty-four hours, I would sue for damages.
That ended the trouble. Half a dozen copies were bound and placed on sale within the required time. Then the canvassing began, and went briskly forward. In nine months the book took the publishing house out of debt, advanced its stock from twenty-five to two hundred, and left seventy thousand dollars profit to the good. It was Bliss that told me this—but if it was true, it was the first time that he had told the truth in sixty-five years. He was born in 1804.
That solved the problem. Half a dozen copies were bound and put on sale within the deadline. Then the marketing started and moved quickly. In nine months, the book got the publishing house out of debt, boosted its stock from twenty-five to two hundred, and left a profit of seventy thousand dollars. It was Bliss who shared this with me—but if it was true, it was the first time he had told the truth in sixty-five years. He was born in 1804.
III.
... This was in 1849. I was fourteen years old, then. We were still living in Hannibal, Missouri, on the banks of the Mississippi, in the new "frame" house built by my father five years before. That is, some of us lived in the new part, the rest in the old part back of it—the "L." In the autumn my sister gave a party, and invited all the marriageable young people of the village. I was too young for this society, and was too bashful to mingle with young ladies, anyway, therefore I was not invited—at least not for the whole evening. Ten minutes of it was to be my whole share. I was to do the part of a bear in a small fairy play. I was to be disguised all over in a close-fitting brown hairy stuff proper for a bear. About half past ten I was told to go to my room and put on this disguise, and be ready in half an hour. I started, but changed my mind; for I wanted to practise a little, and that room was very small. I crossed over to the large unoccupied house on the corner of Main and Hill streets,[4] unaware that a dozen of the young people were also going there to dress for their parts. I took the little black slave boy, Sandy, with me, and we selected a roomy and empty chamber on the second floor. We entered it talking, and this gave a couple of half-dressed young ladies an opportunity to take refuge behind a screen undiscovered. Their gowns and things were hanging on hooks behind the door, but I did not see them; it was Sandy that shut the door, but all his heart was in the theatricals, and he was as unlikely to notice them as I was myself.
... This was in 1849. I was fourteen years old then. We were still living in Hannibal, Missouri, on the banks of the Mississippi, in the new "frame" house built by my father five years earlier. That is, some of us lived in the new part, while the rest stayed in the old part behind it—the "L." In the autumn, my sister hosted a party, inviting all the eligible young people in the village. I was too young for that crowd and too shy to talk to the girls, so I wasn’t invited—at least not for the whole evening. I was allowed to join for just ten minutes. I was going to act as a bear in a little fairy play. I was supposed to wear a snug brown furry outfit made for a bear. Around half past ten, I was told to go to my room and put on the costume, getting ready in half an hour. I started to head there but changed my mind because I wanted to practice a bit, and that room was really small. I crossed over to the big empty house at the corner of Main and Hill streets,[4] not realizing that a dozen of the young people were also going there to get ready for their parts. I brought the little Black boy, Sandy, with me, and we found a spacious, empty room on the second floor. We walked in chatting, which gave a couple of half-dressed young ladies a chance to hide behind a screen without being seen. Their dresses were hanging on hooks behind the door, but I didn’t notice them; it was Sandy who shut the door, and he was just as caught up in the theatrics as I was, so he was unlikely to notice them either.
That was a rickety screen, with many holes in it, but as I did[Pg 454] not know there were girls behind it, I was not disturbed by that detail. If I had known, I could not have undressed in the flood of cruel moonlight that was pouring in at the curtainless windows; I should have died of shame. Untroubled by apprehensions, I stripped to the skin and began my practice. I was full of ambition; I was determined to make a hit; I was burning to establish a reputation as a bear and get further engagements; so I threw myself into my work with an abandon that promised great things. I capered back and forth from one end of the room to the other on all fours, Sandy applauding with enthusiasm; I walked upright and growled and snapped and snarled; I stood on my head, I flung handsprings, I danced a lubberly dance with my paws bent and my imaginary snout sniffing from side to side; I did everything a bear could do, and many things which no bear could ever do and no bear with any dignity would want to do, anyway; and of course I never suspected that I was making a spectacle of myself to any one but Sandy. At last, standing on my head, I paused in that attitude to take a minute's rest. There was a moment's silence, then Sandy spoke up with excited interest and said—
That screen was pretty shaky and had a lot of holes in it, but since I didn’t know there were girls behind it, I wasn’t bothered by that. If I’d known, I wouldn’t have been able to undress in the harsh moonlight pouring in through the bare windows; I would have been so embarrassed. Without any worries, I stripped down and started my practice. I was full of ambition; I was determined to succeed; I was eager to build a reputation as a bear and get more gigs; so I threw myself into my work with an enthusiasm that hinted at great things. I scurried back and forth across the room on all fours, with Sandy cheering me on; I walked upright, growled, snapped, and snarled; I stood on my head, did handsprings, and danced a clumsy dance with my paws bent and my imaginary snout sniffing from side to side; I did everything a bear could do, along with a bunch of things no bear would ever do or would want to do with any dignity; and of course, I had no idea I was putting on a show for anyone but Sandy. Finally, balancing on my head, I paused for a minute’s break. There was a brief silence, then Sandy spoke up with excited interest and said—
"Marse Sam, has you ever seen a smoked herring?"
"Hey Sam, have you ever seen a smoked herring?"
"No. What is that?"
"No. What’s that?"
"It's a fish."
"It's a fish."
"Well, what of it? Anything peculiar about it?"
"Well, so what? Is there anything weird about it?"
"Yes, suh, you bet you dey is. Dey eats 'em guts and all!"
"Yes, sir, you can bet that they do. They eat them up, guts and all!"
There was a smothered burst of feminine snickers from behind the screen! All the strength went out of me and I toppled forward like an undermined tower and brought the screen down with my weight, burying the young ladies under it. In their fright they discharged a couple of piercing screams—and possibly others, but I did not wait to count. I snatched my clothes and fled to the dark hall below, Sandy following. I was dressed in half a minute, and out the back way. I swore Sandy to eternal silence, then we went away and hid until the party was over. The ambition was all out of me. I could not have faced that giddy company after my adventure, for there would be two performers there who knew my secret, and would be privately laughing at me all the time. I was searched for but not found, and the bear had to be played by a young gentleman in his civilized clothes. The house was still and everybody asleep when I finally ventured home. I[Pg 455] was very heavy-hearted, and full of a sense of disgrace. Pinned to my pillow I found a slip of paper which bore a line that did not lighten my heart, but only made my face burn. It was written in a laboriously disguised hand, and these were its mocking terms:
There was a muffled burst of girlish giggles from behind the screen! All my strength drained away, and I toppled forward like a crumbling tower, bringing the screen down with me and trapping the young women underneath. In their shock, they let out a couple of piercing screams—and maybe more, but I didn’t stick around to find out. I grabbed my clothes and rushed to the dark hallway below, with Sandy right behind me. I got dressed in half a minute and slipped out the back. I made Sandy promise to stay quiet forever, then we went away and hid until the party wrapped up. All my ambition had vanished. I couldn't have faced that lively crowd after what just happened, knowing there were two people there who knew my secret and would be laughing at me the whole time. They looked for me but didn't find me, so the bear had to be played by a young gentleman in his normal clothes. The house was quiet, and everyone was asleep when I finally dared to go home. I was feeling really down and ashamed. When I lay down, I found a note pinned to my pillow that didn’t help my mood at all; it made my face flush. It was written in a deliberately disguised handwriting, and here’s what it said:
"You probably couldn't have played bear, but you played bare very well—oh, very very well!"
"You probably couldn't have played bear, but you played bare really well—oh, really really well!"
We think boys are rude, unsensitive animals, but it is not so in all cases. Each boy has one or two sensitive spots, and if you can find out where they are located you have only to touch them and you can scorch him as with fire. I suffered miserably over that episode. I expected that the facts would be all over the village in the morning, but it was not so. The secret remained confined to the two girls and Sandy and me. That was some appeasement of my pain, but it was far from sufficient—the main trouble remained: I was under four mocking eyes, and it might as well have been a thousand, for I suspected all girls' eyes of being the ones I so dreaded. During several weeks I could not look any young lady in the face; I dropped my eyes in confusion when any one of them smiled upon me and gave me greeting; and I said to myself, "That is one of them," and got quickly away. Of course I was meeting the right girls everywhere, but if they ever let slip any betraying sign I was not bright enough to catch it. When I left Hannibal four years later, the secret was still a secret; I had never guessed those girls out, and was no longer expecting to do it. Nor wanting to, either.
We think boys are rude, insensitive creatures, but that's not always the case. Each boy has one or two sensitive areas, and if you can find them, you can hurt him deeply. I was miserable about that incident. I expected everyone in the village would know by morning, but that didn’t happen. The secret stayed between the two girls, Sandy, and me. That was some relief from my pain, but it wasn’t enough—the main issue was that I was under four mocking eyes, and it might as well have been a thousand, because I suspected every girl’s eyes to be the ones I dreaded. For weeks, I couldn’t look any young lady in the face; I’d lower my eyes in embarrassment whenever one smiled at me and greeted me; I’d tell myself, "That is one of them," and quickly leave. Of course, I was encountering the right girls everywhere, but if they ever gave any hint, I wasn’t clever enough to notice it. When I left Hannibal four years later, the secret was still a secret; I had never figured those girls out and didn’t expect to anymore. Nor did I want to.
One of the dearest and prettiest girls in the village at the time of my mishap was one whom I will call Mary Wilson, because that was not her name. She was twenty years old; she was dainty and sweet, peach-bloomy and exquisite, gracious and lovely in character, and I stood in awe of her, for she seemed to me to be made out of angel-clay and rightfully unapproachable by an unholy ordinary kind of a boy like me. I probably never suspected her. But—
One of the most beloved and beautiful girls in the village at the time of my misfortune was someone I’ll call Mary Wilson, although that wasn't her real name. She was twenty years old; she was delicate and charming, with a radiant complexion and exquisite beauty, kind-hearted and lovely in spirit. I admired her greatly, as she seemed to be made of angelic qualities and truly out of reach for an average guy like me. I probably never noticed her. But—
The scene changes. To Calcutta—forty-seven years later. It was in 1896. I arrived there on my lecturing trip. As I entered the hotel a divine vision passed out of it, clothed in the glory of the Indian sunshine—the Mary Wilson of my long-vanished boyhood! It was a startling thing. Before I could recover from the bewildering shock and speak to her she was gone. I thought maybe I had seen an apparition, but it was not so, she[Pg 456] was flesh. She was the granddaughter of the other Mary, the original Mary. That Mary, now a widow, was up-stairs, and presently sent for me. She was old and gray-haired, but she looked young and was very handsome. We sat down and talked. We steeped our thirsty souls in the reviving wine of the past, the beautiful past, the dear and lamented past; we uttered the names that had been silent upon our lips for fifty years, and it was as if they were made of music; with reverent hands we unburied our dead, the mates of our youth, and caressed them with our speech; we searched the dusty chambers of our memories and dragged forth incident after incident, episode after episode, folly after folly, and laughed such good laughs over them, with the tears running down; and finally Mary said suddenly, and without any leading up—
The scene shifts. To Calcutta—forty-seven years later. It was in 1896. I arrived there for my lecture tour. As I walked into the hotel, a stunning vision emerged from it, lit by the glorious Indian sunshine—Mary Wilson from my long-lost childhood! It was shocking. Before I could recover from the overwhelming surprise and speak to her, she disappeared. I thought maybe I had seen a ghost, but that wasn’t the case; she was real. She was the granddaughter of the other Mary, the original Mary. That Mary, now a widow, was upstairs, and she soon called for me. She was old and gray-haired, but she appeared young and was very attractive. We sat down and talked. We quenched our thirsty souls with the refreshing memories of the past, the beautiful past, the cherished and mourned past; we spoke the names that had been silenced on our lips for fifty years, and they were like music; with reverent hearts, we unearthed our lost friends from our youth and treasured them with our words; we rummaged through the dusty corners of our memories, bringing forth story after story, episode after episode, folly after folly, and laughed so hard over them, with tears streaming down our faces; and finally, Mary suddenly said, without any lead-up—
"Tell me! What is the special peculiarity of smoked herrings?"
"Tell me! What is so special about smoked herrings?"
It seemed a strange question at such a hallowed time as this. And so inconsequential, too. I was a little shocked. And yet I was aware of a stir of some kind away back in the deeps of my memory somewhere. It set me to musing—thinking—searching. Smoked herrings. Smoked herrings. The peculiarity of smo.... I glanced up. Her face was grave, but there was a dim and shadowy twinkle in her eye which—All of a sudden I knew! and far away down in the hoary past I heard a remembered voice murmur, "Dey eats 'em guts and all!"
It felt like a weird question at such a sacred moment. And so trivial, too. I was a bit taken aback. Yet, I sensed a flicker of something deep in my memory. It got me thinking—reflecting—searching. Smoked herrings. Smoked herrings. The oddity of smo.... I looked up. Her face was serious, but there was a faint, shadowy sparkle in her eye that—Suddenly, it hit me! And way back in the distant past, I heard a familiar voice whisper, "They eat 'em guts and all!"
"At—last! I've found one of you, anyway! Who was the other girl?"
"Finally! I’ve found one of you! Who was the other girl?"
But she drew the line there. She wouldn't tell me.
But she stopped there. She wouldn't tell me.
FOOTNOTE:
[4] That house still stands.
That house is still standing.
IV.
... But it was on a bench in Washington Square that I saw the most of Louis Stevenson. It was an outing that lasted an hour or more, and was very pleasant and sociable. I had come with him from his house, where I had been paying my respects to his family. His business in the Square was to absorb the sunshine. He was most scantily furnished with flesh, his clothes seemed to fall into hollows as if there might be nothing inside but the frame for a sculptor's statue. His long face and lank hair and dark complexion and musing and melancholy expression seemed to fit these details justly and harmoniously, and the alto[Pg 457]gether of it seemed especially planned to gather the rays of your observation and focalize them upon Stevenson's special distinction and commanding feature, his splendid eyes. They burned with a smouldering rich fire under the penthouse of his brows, and they made him beautiful.
... But it was on a bench in Washington Square that I saw the most of Louis Stevenson. It was an outing that lasted an hour or more, and it was very pleasant and social. I had come with him from his house, where I had paid my respects to his family. His purpose in the Square was to soak up the sunshine. He was very slim, and his clothes seemed to drape into hollows as if there might be nothing inside but the frame of a sculptor's statue. His long face, lank hair, and dark complexion, along with his thoughtful and somewhat sad expression, fit these details just right, and all together it seemed designed to attract your attention and focus it on Stevenson's unique distinction and striking feature, his amazing eyes. They burned with a smoldering, rich fire under the shade of his brows, which made him look beautiful.
I said I thought he was right about the others, but mistaken as to Bret Harte; in substance I said that Harte was good company and a thin but pleasant talker; that he was always bright, but never brilliant; that in this matter he must not be classed with Thomas Bailey Aldrich, nor must any other man, ancient or modern; that Aldrich was always witty, always brilliant, if there was anybody present capable of striking his flint at the right angle; that Aldrich was as sure and prompt and unfailing as the red-hot iron on the blacksmith's anvil—you had only to hit it competently to make it deliver an explosion of sparks. I added—
I said I thought he was right about the others, but wrong about Bret Harte. Essentially, I said that Harte was good company and a light but pleasant conversationalist; that he was always cheerful, but never exceptional; that in this regard he shouldn’t be compared to Thomas Bailey Aldrich, nor to anyone else, past or present; that Aldrich was always witty, always brilliant, as long as there was someone around who could strike his spark at the right angle; that Aldrich was as reliable and quick as the red-hot iron on the blacksmith's anvil—you just had to hit it correctly to make it shoot out sparks. I added—
"Aldrich has never had his peer for prompt and pithy and witty and humorous sayings. None has equalled him, certainly none has surpassed him, in the felicity of phrasing with which he clothed these children of his fancy. Aldrich was always brilliant, he couldn't help it, he is a fire-opal set round with rose diamonds; when he is not speaking, you know that his dainty fancies are twinkling and glimmering around in him; when he speaks the diamonds flash. Yes, he was always brilliant, he will always be brilliant; he will be brilliant in hell—you will see."
"Aldrich has never had anyone quite like him for quick, sharp, witty, and humorous remarks. No one has matched him, and certainly no one has outdone him, in the way he skillfully expressed his imaginative ideas. Aldrich was always dazzling; it was just his nature, like a fire-opal surrounded by rose diamonds. Even when he’s quiet, you can tell his delightful thoughts are sparkling inside him; when he talks, the diamonds shine. Yes, he was always brilliant, he will always be brilliant; he will be brilliant in hell—you'll see."
Stevenson, smiling a chuckly smile, "I hope not."
Stevenson, smiling with a chuckle, "I hope not."
"Well, you will, and he will dim even those ruddy fires and look like a transfigured Adonis backed against a pink sunset."
"Well, you will, and he will even dim those bright flames and look like a transformed Adonis set against a pink sunset."
There on that bench we struck out a new phrase—one or the other of us, I don't remember which—"submerged renown." Variations were discussed: "submerged fame," "submerged reputation," and so on, and a choice was made; "submerged renown" was elected, I believe. This important matter rose out of an incident which had been happening to Stevenson in Albany. While in a book-shop or book-stall there he had noticed a long rank of small books, cheaply but neatly gotten up, and bearing such titles as "Davis's Selected Speeches," "Davis's Selected Poetry," Davis's this and Davis's that and Davis's the other thing; compilations, every one of them, each with a brief, compact, intelligent[Pg 458] and useful introductory chapter by this same Davis, whose first name I have forgotten. Stevenson had begun the matter with this question:
There on that bench, we came up with a new phrase—one of us, I can’t remember who—“submerged renown.” We talked about variations like “submerged fame,” “submerged reputation,” and so on, and eventually decided on “submerged renown.” This important topic stemmed from something happening to Stevenson in Albany. While he was in a bookstore, he noticed a long row of small books, cheaply but neatly produced, with titles like “Davis's Selected Speeches,” “Davis's Selected Poetry,” “Davis's this,” and “Davis's that,” and so on; compilations, each with a brief, clear, and useful introductory chapter by this same Davis, whose first name I've forgotten. Stevenson had started the conversation with this question:
"Can you name the American author whose fame and acceptance stretch widest in the States?"
"Can you name the American author who is most famous and widely accepted in the U.S.?"
I thought I could, but it did not seem to me that it would be modest to speak out, in the circumstances. So I diffidently said nothing. Stevenson noticed, and said—
I thought I could, but it didn’t seem right to speak up under the circumstances. So I hesitantly said nothing. Stevenson noticed and said—
"Save your delicacy for another time—you are not the one. For a shilling you can't name the American author of widest note and popularity in the States. But I can."
"Save your niceties for later—you’re not the one. For a dime, you can't name the most popular American author in the States. But I can."
Then he went on and told about that Albany incident. He had inquired of the shopman—
Then he continued and shared what happened in Albany. He had asked the shopkeeper—
"Who is this Davis?"
"Who is this Davis?"
The answer was—
The answer was—
"An author whose books have to have freight-trains to carry them, not baskets. Apparently you have not heard of him?"
"An author whose books need freight trains to transport them, not just baskets. I guess you haven't heard of him?"
Stevenson said no, this was the first time. The man said—
Stevenson said no, this was the first time. The man said—
"Nobody has heard of Davis: you may ask all around and you will see. You never see his name mentioned in print, not even in advertisement; these things are of no use to Davis, not any more than they are to the wind and the sea. You never see one of Davis's books floating on top of the United States, but put on your diving armor and get yourself lowered away down and down and down till you strike the dense region, the sunless region of eternal drudgery and starvation wages—there you'll find them by the million. The man that gets that market, his fortune is made, his bread and butter are safe, for those people will never go back on him. An author may have a reputation which is confined to the surface, and lose it and become pitied, then despised, then forgotten, entirely forgotten—the frequent steps in a surface reputation. At surface reputation, however great, is always mortal, and always killable if you go at it right—with pins and needles, and quiet slow poison, not with the club and tomahawk. But it is a different matter with the submerged reputation—down in the deep water; once a favorite there, always a favorite; once beloved, always beloved; once respected, always respected, honored, and believed in. For, what the reviewer says never finds its way down into those placid deeps; nor the newspaper sneers, nor any breath of the winds of slander blowing above. Down there they[Pg 459] never hear of these things. Their idol may be painted clay, up then at the surface, and fade and waste and crumble and blow away, there being much weather there; but down below he is gold and adamant and indestructible."
"Nobody knows about Davis: you can ask around and you won't find anyone who has. You never see his name in print, not even in ads; these things mean nothing to Davis, just like they mean nothing to the wind and the sea. You won't see one of Davis's books sitting at the top of the United States charts, but if you put on your diving gear and go down, down, down until you reach the dense, sunless area of exhausting work and meager pay—there you'll find them by the millions. The person who taps into that market will make a fortune; their livelihood will be secure because those readers will never turn their back on them. An author might have a reputation that only exists on the surface, and lose it to become pitied, then looked down upon, then completely forgotten—those are the usual stages of a surface reputation. However great a surface reputation might be, it is always short-lived and can be destroyed if attacked the right way—with subtlety, not with brute force. But it’s a different story for a submerged reputation—down in the deeper waters; once someone is loved there, they remain loved; once someone is respected, they stay respected, honored, and believed in. Because what the reviewer says never reaches those calm depths; neither do snarky newspaper comments nor any whispers of slander floating above. Down there they[Pg 459] never hear about these things. Their idol might be made of just painted clay at the surface, fading away and crumbling under the elements, but down below, they are gold and unbreakable."
V.
This is from this morning's paper:
This is from this morning's newspaper:
MARK TWAIN LETTER SOLD.
MARK TWAIN LETTER SOLD.
Written to Thomas Nast, it Proposed a Joint Tour.
Written to Thomas Nast, it suggested a joint tour.
A Mark Twain autograph letter brought $43 yesterday at the auction by the Merwin-Clayton Company of the library and correspondence of the late Thomas Nast, cartoonist. The letter is nine pages note-paper, is dated Hartford, Nov. 12, 1877, and it addressed to Nast. It reads in part as follows:
A signed letter from Mark Twain sold for $43 yesterday at an auction by the Merwin-Clayton Company, which featured the library and correspondence of the late cartoonist Thomas Nast. The letter consists of nine pages on notepaper, dated Hartford, Nov. 12, 1877, and addressed to Nast. It includes the following:
Hartford, Nov. 12.
Hartford, Nov. 12.
My Dear Nast: I did not think I should ever stand on a platform again until the time was come for me to say I die innocent. But the same old offers keep arriving that have arriven every year, and been every year declined—$500 for Louisville, $500 for St. Louis, $1,000 gold for two nights in Toronto, half gross proceeds for New York, Boston, Brooklyn, &c. I have declined them all just as usual, though sorely tempted as usual.
My Dear Nast: I didn't think I'd ever be on a stage again until it was time for me to proclaim my innocence. But the same old offers keep coming in every year, and I’ve turned them down consistently—$500 for Louisville, $500 for St. Louis, $1,000 in gold for two nights in Toronto, half of the gross receipts for New York, Boston, Brooklyn, etc. I've rejected them all just like I always do, even though I still feel tempted.
Now, I do not decline because I mind talking to an audience, but because (1) travelling alone is so heart-breakingly dreary, and (2) shouldering the whole show is such cheer-killing responsibility.
Now, I’m not declining because I dislike speaking to an audience, but because (1) traveling alone is really depressing, and (2) carrying the whole event is such a joy-sucking responsibility.
Therefore I now propose to you what you proposed to me in November, 1867—ten years ago, (when I was unknown,) viz.; That you should stand on the platform and make pictures, and I stand by you and blackguard the audience. I should enormously enjoy meandering around (to big towns—don't want to go to little ones) with you for company.
So, I’m now proposing what you suggested to me back in November 1867—ten years ago, when I was a nobody; that you should be on stage creating art, and I’ll be there, joking with the audience. I would really enjoy traveling to big cities (I don’t want to go to small ones) with you for company.
The letter includes a schedule of cities and the number of appearances planned for each.
The letter also includes a list of cities and the number of events scheduled for each.
This is as it should be. This is worthy of all praise. I say it myself lest other competent persons should forget to do it. It appears that four of my ancient letters were sold at auction, three of them at twenty-seven dollars, twenty-eight dollars, and twenty-nine dollars respectively, and the one above mentioned at forty-three dollars. There is one very gratifying circumstance about this, to wit: that my literature has more than held its own as regards money value through this stretch of thirty-six years. I judge that the forty-three-dollar letter must have gone at about ten cents a word, whereas if I had written it to-day its market[Pg 460] rate would be thirty cents—so I have increased in value two or three hundred per cent. I note another gratifying circumstance—that a letter of General Grant's sold at something short of eighteen dollars. I can't rise to General Grant's lofty place in the estimation of this nation, but it is a deep happiness to me to know that when it comes to epistolary literature he can't sit in the front seat along with me.
This is how it should be. This deserves all the praise. I'm saying it myself so that other capable people don’t forget to mention it. It turns out that four of my old letters were sold at auction; three of them went for twenty-seven dollars, twenty-eight dollars, and twenty-nine dollars respectively, and the one I mentioned above sold for forty-three dollars. There is one very satisfying thing about this: my writing has held its value over the past thirty-six years. I figure that the forty-three-dollar letter must have sold for about ten cents a word, whereas if I had written it today, its market rate would be thirty cents—so my value has increased by two or three hundred percent. I also notice another encouraging fact—that a letter from General Grant sold for just under eighteen dollars. I may not reach General Grant's high status in this nation’s view, but it brings me great joy to know that when it comes to letter writing, he can't sit in the front seat with me.
This reminds me—nine years ago, when we were living in Tedworth Square, London, a report was cabled to the American journals that I was dying. I was not the one. It was another Clemens, a cousin of mine,—Dr. J. Ross Clemens, now of St. Louis—who was due to die but presently escaped, by some chicanery or other characteristic of the tribe of Clemens. The London representatives of the American papers began to flock in, with American cables in their hands, to inquire into my condition. There was nothing the matter with me, and each in his turn was astonished, and disappointed, to find me reading and smoking in my study and worth next to nothing as a text for transatlantic news. One of these men was a gentle and kindly and grave and sympathetic Irishman, who hid his sorrow the best he could, and tried to look glad, and told me that his paper, the Evening Sun, had cabled him that it was reported in New York that I was dead. What should he cable in reply? I said—
This reminds me—nine years ago, when we were living in Tedworth Square, London, a report was sent to the American newspapers saying that I was dying. It wasn't me; it was another Clemens, a cousin of mine—Dr. J. Ross Clemens, now from St. Louis—who was actually on the verge of death but somehow dodged it, thanks to some trick typical of the Clemens family. The London reporters from the American papers started showing up, cables in hand, asking about my health. There was nothing wrong with me, and each one was surprised and let down to see me reading and smoking in my study, which wasn’t much of a story for the American news. One of these guys was a gentle, kind, serious, and sympathetic Irishman who tried to hide his disappointment and put on a happy face. He told me that his newspaper, the Evening Sun, had sent him a message saying it was rumored in New York that I was dead. What should he say in reply? I said—
"Say the report is greatly exaggerated."
"Say the report is way overblown."
He never smiled, but went solemnly away and sent the cable in those words. The remark hit the world pleasantly, and to this day it keeps turning up, now and then, in the newspapers when people have occasion to discount exaggerations.
He never smiled, but walked away seriously and sent the cable with those words. The comment resonated positively with people, and to this day it occasionally appears in newspapers when there's a need to counter exaggerations.
The next man was also an Irishman. He had his New York cablegram in his hand—from the New York World—and he was so evidently trying to get around that cable with invented softnesses and palliations that my curiosity was aroused and I wanted to see what it did really say. So when occasion offered I slipped it out of his hand. It said,
The next guy was also Irish. He had his New York telegram in his hand—from the New York World—and he was clearly trying to sidestep the content with made-up excuses and softening phrases, which piqued my curiosity. I wanted to see what it actually said. So when the chance came, I took it out of his hand. It said,
"If Mark Twain dying send five hundred words. If dead send a thousand."
"If Mark Twain is dying, send five hundred words. If he's dead, send a thousand."
Now that old letter of mine sold yesterday for forty-three dollars. When I am dead it will be worth eighty-six.
Now that old letter of mine sold yesterday for forty-three dollars. When I’m gone, it will be worth eighty-six.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DC.
OCTOBER 5, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—III.
BY MARK TWAIN.
VI.
To-morrow will be the thirty-sixth anniversary of our marriage. My wife passed from this life one year and eight months ago, in Florence, Italy, after an unbroken illness of twenty-two months' duration.
Tomorrow will be the thirty-sixth anniversary of our marriage. My wife passed away one year and eight months ago in Florence, Italy, after a continuous illness that lasted twenty-two months.
I saw her first in the form of an ivory miniature in her brother Charley's stateroom in the steamer "Quaker City," in the Bay of Smyrna, in the summer of 1867, when she was in her twenty-second year. I saw her in the flesh for the first time in New York in the following December. She was slender and beautiful and girlish—and she was both girl and woman. She remained both girl and woman to the last day of her life. Under a grave[Pg 578] and gentle exterior burned inextinguishable fires of sympathy, energy, devotion, enthusiasm, and absolutely limitless affection. She was always frail in body, and she lived upon her spirit, whose hopefulness and courage were indestructible. Perfect truth, perfect honesty, perfect candor, were qualities of her character which were born with her. Her judgments of people and things were sure and accurate. Her intuitions almost never deceived her. In her judgments of the characters and acts of both friends and strangers, there was always room for charity, and this charity never failed. I have compared and contrasted her with hundreds of persons, and my conviction remains that hers was the most perfect character I have ever met. And I may add that she was the most winningly dignified person I have ever known. Her character and disposition were of the sort that not only invites worship, but commands it. No servant ever left her service who deserved to remain in it. And, as she could choose with a glance of her eye, the servants she selected did in almost all cases deserve to remain, and they did remain. She was always cheerful; and she was always able to communicate her cheerfulness to others. During the nine years that we spent in poverty and debt, she was always able to reason me out of my despairs, and find a bright side to the clouds, and make me see it. In all that time, I never knew her to utter a word of regret concerning our altered circumstances, nor did I ever know her children to do the like. For she had taught them, and they drew their fortitude from her. The love which she bestowed upon those whom she loved took the form of worship, and in that form it was returned—returned by relatives, friends and the servants of her household. It was a strange combination which wrought into one individual, so to speak, by marriage—her disposition and character and mine. She poured out her prodigal affections in kisses and caresses, and in a vocabulary of endearments whose profusion was always an astonishment to me. I was born reserved as to endearments of speech and caresses, and hers broke upon me as the summer waves break upon Gibraltar. I was reared in that atmosphere of reserve. As I have already said, in another chapter, I never knew a member of my father's family to kiss another member of it except once, and that at a death-bed. And our village was not a kissing community. The kissing and caressing ended with courtship—along with the deadly piano-playing of that day.
I first saw her as a small ivory statue in her brother Charley's room on the steamer "Quaker City" in the Bay of Smyrna during the summer of 1867 when she was twenty-two. I saw her in person for the first time in New York the following December. She was slender, beautiful, and youthful, embodying both girl and woman. She remained both throughout her life. Beneath a serious and gentle exterior burned unquenchable flames of sympathy, energy, devotion, enthusiasm, and boundless affection. She was always physically delicate, relying on her spirit, which was filled with hope and courage that couldn't be broken. Perfect truth, honesty, and candor were part of her character from birth. Her judgments of people and situations were reliable and accurate. Her intuitions almost never let her down. In her assessments of friends and strangers alike, there was always room for understanding, and that compassion was unfailing. I have compared her with countless people, and I’m convinced that hers was the most perfect character I have ever known. Additionally, she was the most charmingly dignified person I’ve ever encountered. Her character and demeanor invited admiration and even demanded it. No servant who deserved to stay ever left her employment. And since she could choose with just a glance, the servants she picked usually deserved to stay, and they did. She was always cheerful and had a way of sharing that cheerfulness with others. During the nine years we spent in financial struggle, she always managed to pull me out of my despair, helping me find a silver lining in the clouds and showing it to me. Throughout that time, I never heard her express regret about our changed circumstances, nor did I ever hear our children do so. She had taught them well, and they drew strength from her. The love she gave to those she cherished was like worship, and it was reciprocated—returned by family, friends, and household staff. It was a unique blend created by marriage—her disposition and character mixed with mine. She showered her abundant affection with kisses and tender words, using a vocabulary of endearments that always amazed me. I naturally held back when it came to affectionate words and gestures, and her love overwhelmed me like summer waves crashing against Gibraltar. I grew up in a reserved environment. As I’ve mentioned in another chapter, I never saw a member of my father's family kiss another, except once at a deathbed. Our village wasn’t one for kissing. Affectionate gestures ceased after courtship, along with the tedious piano playing of that era.
[Pg 579]She had the heart-free laugh of a girl. It came seldom, but when it broke upon the ear it was as inspiring as music. I heard it for the last time when she had been occupying her sickbed for more than a year, and I made a written note of it at the time—a note not to be repeated.
[Pg 579]She had the carefree laugh of a girl. It didn’t happen often, but when it rang out, it was as uplifting as music. I heard it for the last time after she had been in bed sick for over a year, and I made a note of it at that moment—a note that won’t be repeated.
To-morrow will be the thirty-sixth anniversary. We were married in her father's house in Elmira, New York, and went next day, by special train, to Buffalo, along with the whole Langdon family, and with the Beechers and the Twichells, who had solemnized the marriage. We were to live in Buffalo, where I was to be one of the editors of the Buffalo "Express," and a part owner of the paper. I knew nothing about Buffalo, but I had made my household arrangements there through a friend, by letter. I had instructed him to find a boarding-house of as respectable a character as my light salary as editor would command. We were received at about nine o'clock at the station in Buffalo, and were put into several sleighs and driven all over America, as it seemed to me—for, apparently, we turned all the corners in the town and followed all the streets there were—I scolding freely, and characterizing that friend of mine in very uncomplimentary words for securing a boarding-house that apparently had no definite locality. But there was a conspiracy—and my bride knew of it, but I was in ignorance. Her father, Jervis Langdon, had bought and furnished a new house for us in the fashionable street, Delaware Avenue, and had laid in a cook and housemaids, and a brisk and electric young coachman, an Irishman, Patrick McAleer—and we were being driven all over that city in order that one sleighful of those people could have time to go to the house, and see that the gas was lighted all over it, and a hot supper prepared for the crowd. We arrived at last, and when I entered that fairy place my indignation reached high-water mark, and without any reserve I delivered my opinion to that friend of mine for being so stupid as to put us into a boarding-house whose terms would be far out of my reach. Then Mr. Langdon brought forward a very pretty box and opened it, and took from it a deed of the house. So the comedy ended very pleasantly, and we sat down to supper.
Tomorrow marks the thirty-sixth anniversary. We got married in her father's house in Elmira, New York, and the next day took a special train to Buffalo with the entire Langdon family, along with the Beechers and the Twichells, who officiated the marriage. We were supposed to live in Buffalo, where I was going to be one of the editors of the Buffalo "Express" and a part-owner of the paper. I didn’t know anything about Buffalo, but I had arranged our living situation through a friend via letter. I asked him to find a boarding house that was respectable enough for my modest salary as editor. We were welcomed at the Buffalo station around nine o'clock and were put into several sleighs, driving all over town, or at least it felt that way to me—because it seemed like we turned every corner and followed every street—while I vented my frustrations and criticized my friend for finding us a boarding house in such an unclear location. But there was a scheme afoot—one that my bride was in on, but I was completely clueless. Her father, Jervis Langdon, had bought and furnished a new house for us on fashionable Delaware Avenue and had hired a cook, housemaids, and a lively Irish coachman named Patrick McAleer. We were being driven all around the city to give one group of people time to get to the house, make sure the gas was lit, and prepare a hot dinner for everyone. Finally, we arrived, and when I walked into that magical place, my anger peaked, and I bluntly expressed my frustration to my friend for being so foolish as to put us in a boarding house that would have costs far beyond my means. Then Mr. Langdon presented a lovely little box, opened it, and revealed the deed to the house. So the comedy ended on a joyful note, and we sat down to dinner.
The company departed about midnight, and left us alone in our new quarters. Then Ellen, the cook, came in to get orders for the morning's marketing—and neither of us knew whether[Pg 580] beefsteak was sold by the barrel or by the yard. We exposed our ignorance, and Ellen was fall of Irish delight over it. Patrick McAleer, that brisk young Irishman, came in to get his orders for next day—and that was our first glimpse of him....
The company left around midnight, leaving us alone in our new place. Then Ellen, the cook, came in to take orders for the morning's shopping—and neither of us knew whether[Pg 580] beefsteak was sold by the barrel or by the yard. We admitted our cluelessness, and Ellen was full of Irish delight over it. Patrick McAleer, that lively young Irishman, came in to get his orders for the next day—and that was our first glimpse of him....
Our first child, Langdon Clemens, was born the 7th of November, 1870, and lived twenty-two months. Susy was born the 19th of March, 1872, and passed from life in the Hartford home, the 18th of August, 1896. With her, when the end came, were Jean and Katy Leary, and John and Ellen (the gardener and his wife). Clara and her mother and I arrived in England from around the world on the 31st of July, and took a house in Guildford. A week later, when Susy, Katy and Jean should have been arriving from America, we got a letter instead.
Our first child, Langdon Clemens, was born on November 7, 1870, and lived for twenty-two months. Susy was born on March 19, 1872, and passed away in our Hartford home on August 18, 1896. With her at the end were Jean and Katy Leary, and John and Ellen (the gardener and his wife). Clara, her mother, and I arrived in England from our travels around the world on July 31, and rented a house in Guildford. A week later, when Susy, Katy, and Jean were supposed to arrive from America, we received a letter instead.
It explained that Susy was slightly ill—nothing of consequence. But we were disquieted, and began to cable for later news. This was Friday. All day no answer—and the ship to leave Southampton next day, at noon. Clara and her mother began packing, to be ready in case the news should be bad. Finally came a cablegram saying, "Wait for cablegram in the morning." This was not satisfactory—not reassuring. I cabled again, asking that the answer be sent to Southampton, for the day was now closing. I waited in the post-office that night till the doors were closed, toward midnight, in the hope that good news might still come, but there was no message. We sat silent at home till one in the morning, waiting—waiting for we knew not what. Then we took the earliest morning train, and when we reached Southampton the message was there. It said the recovery would be long, but certain. This was a great relief to me, but not to my wife. She was frightened. She and Clara went aboard the steamer at once and sailed for America, to nurse Susy. I remained behind to search for a larger house in Guildford.
It said that Susy was a little sick—nothing serious. But we were worried and started sending cables for updates. This was Friday. All day there was no reply—and the ship was set to leave Southampton the next day at noon. Clara and her mom began packing, just in case the news was bad. Finally, we received a cable that read, "Wait for a cable in the morning." This was not reassuring. I sent another cable, asking for the response to be sent to Southampton since the day was ending. I stayed in the post office that night until closing, around midnight, hoping for good news, but there was no message. We sat in silence at home until one in the morning, just waiting—waiting for who knows what. Then we took the earliest morning train, and when we arrived in Southampton, the message was there. It said that the recovery would be long, but certain. This eased my mind, but not my wife’s. She was scared. She and Clara boarded the steamer immediately and sailed for America to care for Susy. I stayed behind to look for a bigger house in Guildford.
That was the 15th of August, 1896. Three days later, when my wife and Clara were about half-way across the ocean, I was standing in our dining-room thinking of nothing in particular, when a cablegram was put into my hand. It said, "Susy was peacefully released to-day."
That was August 15, 1896. Three days later, when my wife and Clara were about halfway across the ocean, I was standing in our dining room, not really thinking about anything in particular, when someone handed me a cablegram. It said, "Susy was peacefully released today."
It is one of the mysteries of our nature that a man, all unprepared, can receive a thunder-stroke like that and live. There is but one reasonable explanation of it. The intellect is stunned by the shock, and but gropingly gathers the meaning of the words.[Pg 581] The power to realize their fall import is mercifully wanting. The mind has a dumb sense of vast loss—that is all. It will take mind and memory months, and possibly years, to gather together the details, and thus learn and know the whole extent of the loss. A man's house burns down. The smoking wreckage represents only a ruined home that was dear through years of use and pleasant associations. By and by, as the days and weeks go on, first he misses this, then that, then the other thing. And, when he casts about for it, he finds that it was in that house. Always it is an essential—there was but one of its kind. It cannot be replaced. It was in that house. It is irrevocably lost. He did not realize that it was an essential when he had it; he only discovers it now when he finds himself balked, hampered, by its absence. It will be years before the tale of lost essentials is complete, and not till then can he truly know the magnitude of his disaster.
It's one of the mysteries of our nature that a person, completely unprepared, can face such a shocking experience and still survive. There’s really only one reasonable explanation for this. The mind is momentarily stunned by the impact and only gradually begins to grasp the meaning of the words.[Pg 581] The ability to fully understand the depth of their significance is thankfully absent. The mind has a vague awareness of a tremendous loss—that's all. It will take a long time, possibly months or even years, for the mind and memory to piece together the details and fully comprehend the extent of the loss. Imagine a man's house burning down. The charred remains represent not just a destroyed home that was cherished over the years, but all the pleasant memories tied to it. As days and weeks pass, he starts to miss one thing after another. When he looks for these items, he realizes they were in that house. Each one is an essential—there was only one of each, and they can't be replaced. They were in that house. They are irrevocably lost. He didn't recognize their importance when he had them; he only realizes it now, when he feels restricted and hindered by their absence. It will take years before he can fully recount the story of everything he lost, and only then will he truly understand the magnitude of his disaster.
The 18th of August brought me the awful tidings. The mother and the sister were out there in mid-Atlantic, ignorant of what was happening; flying to meet this incredible calamity. All that could be done to protect them from the full force of the shock was done by relatives and good friends. They went down the Bay and met the ship at night, but did not show themselves until morning, and then only to Clara. When she returned to the stateroom she did not speak, and did not need to. Her mother looked at her and said:
The 18th of August brought me terrible news. Mom and my sister were out in the middle of the Atlantic, unaware of what was happening; rushing to face this unbelievable disaster. Relatives and good friends did everything they could to shield them from the full impact of the shock. They went down the Bay and met the ship at night, but didn’t reveal themselves until morning, and then only to Clara. When she returned to the stateroom, she didn’t say a word, and didn’t need to. Her mother looked at her and said:
"Susy is dead."
"Susy has passed away."
At half past ten o'clock that night, Clara and her mother completed their circuit of the globe, and drew up at Elmira by the same train and in the same car which had borne them and me Westward from it one year, one month, and one week before. And again Susy was there—not waving her welcome in the glare of the lights, as she had waved her farewell to us thirteen months before, but lying white and fair in her coffin, in the house where she was born.
At 10:30 that night, Clara and her mom finished their journey around the world and arrived in Elmira on the same train and in the same car that had taken us West a year, a month, and a week ago. And once more, Susy was there—not greeting us in the bright lights like she had said goodbye to us thirteen months earlier, but lying pale and peaceful in her coffin, in the house where she was born.
The last thirteen days of Susy's life were spent in our own house in Hartford, the home of her childhood, and always the dearest place in the earth to her. About her she had faithful old friends—her pastor, Mr. Twichell, who had known her from the cradle, and who had come a long journey to be with her; her uncle and aunt, Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Crane; Patrick, the[Pg 582] coachman; Katy, who had begun to serve us when Susy was a child of eight years; John and Ellen, who had been with us many years. Also Jean was there.
The last thirteen days of Susy's life were spent in our own house in Hartford, the home of her childhood, and always the most cherished place on earth for her. Around her were loyal old friends—her pastor, Mr. Twichell, who had known her since she was born and traveled a long way to be with her; her uncle and aunt, Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Crane; Patrick, the [Pg 582] coachman; Katy, who started working for us when Susy was eight years old; and John and Ellen, who had been with us for many years. Jean was also there.
At the hour when my wife and Clara set sail for America, Susy was in no danger. Three hours later there came a sudden change for the worse. Meningitis set in, and it was immediately apparent that she was death-struck. That was Saturday, the 15th of August.
At the time my wife and Clara left for America, Susy was safe. Three hours later, her condition took a sudden turn for the worse. Meningitis kicked in, and it quickly became clear that she was dying. That was Saturday, August 15th.
"That evening she took food for the last time," (Jean's letter to me). The next morning the brain-fever was raging. She walked the floor a little in her pain and delirium, then succumbed to weakness and returned to her bed. Previously she had found hanging in a closet a gown which she had seen her mother wear. She thought it was her mother, dead, and she kissed it, and cried. About noon she became blind (an effect of the disease) and bewailed it to her uncle.
"That evening she took food for the last time," (Jean's letter to me). The next morning, the brain fever was intense. She paced the floor for a while, overwhelmed by pain and delirium, then gave in to weakness and went back to bed. Earlier, she had discovered a gown hanging in a closet that she recognized as one her mother used to wear. She mistook it for her dead mother and kissed it, crying. Around noon, she went blind (a symptom of the disease) and lamented this to her uncle.
From Jean's letter I take this sentence, which needs no comment:
From Jean's letter, I take this sentence, which requires no further explanation:
"About one in the afternoon Susy spoke for the last time."
"At around one in the afternoon, Susy spoke for the last time."
It was only one word that she said when she spoke that last time, and it told of her longing. She groped with her hands and found Katy, and caressed her face, and said "Mamma."
It was just one word she uttered when she spoke for the last time, and it revealed her yearning. She reached out with her hands, found Katy, gently touched her face, and said, "Mom."
How gracious it was that, in that forlorn hour of wreck and ruin, with the night of death closing around her, she should have been granted that beautiful illusion—that the latest vision which rested upon the clouded mirror of her mind should have been the vision of her mother, and the latest emotion she should know in life the joy and peace of that dear imagined presence.
How kind it was that, in that hopeless moment of destruction and despair, with the darkness of death surrounding her, she was given that beautiful illusion—that the last image reflected in the murky mirror of her mind was of her mother, and the final feeling she experienced in life was the joy and peace of that beloved imagined presence.
About two o'clock she composed herself as if for sleep, and never moved again. She fell into unconsciousness and so remained two days and five hours, until Tuesday evening at seven minutes past seven, when the release came. She was twenty-four years and five months old.
About two o'clock she settled down as if getting ready for sleep and never moved again. She slipped into unconsciousness and stayed that way for two days and five hours, until Tuesday evening at seven minutes past seven, when she finally passed away. She was twenty-four years and five months old.
On the 23d, her mother and her sisters saw her laid to rest—she that had been our wonder and our worship.
On the 23rd, her mother and sisters watched her be laid to rest—she who had been our admiration and our devotion.
In one of her own books I find some verses which I will copy here. Apparently, she always put borrowed matter in quotation marks. These verses lack those marks, and therefore I take them to be her own:[Pg 583]
In one of her books, I found some verses that I’ll share here. She seemed to always put borrowed material in quotation marks. Since these verses don’t have those marks, I assume they are her own:[Pg 583]
The summer seasons of Susy's childhood were spent at Quarry Farm, on the hills east of Elmira, New York; the other seasons of the year at the home in Hartford. Like other children, she was blithe and happy, fond of play; unlike the average of children, she was at times much given to retiring within herself, and trying to search out the hidden meanings of the deep things that make the puzzle and pathos of human existence, and in all the ages have baffled the inquirer and mocked him. As a little child aged seven, she was oppressed and perplexed by the maddening repetition of the stock incidents of our race's fleeting sojourn here, just as the same thing has oppressed and perplexed maturer minds from the beginning of time. A myriad of men are born; they labor and sweat and struggle for bread; they squabble and scold and fight; they scramble for little mean advantages over each other; age creeps upon them; infirmities follow; shames and humiliations bring down their prides and their vanities; those they love are taken from them, and the joy of life is turned to aching grief. The burden of pain, care, misery, grows heavier year by year; at length, ambition is dead, pride is dead; vanity is dead; longing for release is in their place. It comes at last—the only unpoisoned gift earth ever had for them—and they vanish from a world where they were of no consequence; where they achieved nothing; where they were a mistake and a failure and a foolishness; there they have left no sign that they have existed—a world which will lament them a day and forget them forever. Then another myriad takes their place, and copies all they did, and goes along the same profitless road, and vanishes as they vanished—to make room for another, and another, and a million other myriads, to follow the same arid path through the same desert, and accomplish what the first myriad, and all the myriads that came after it, accomplished—nothing!
The summer seasons of Susy's childhood were spent at Quarry Farm, on the hills east of Elmira, New York; the other seasons of the year at the home in Hartford. Like other kids, she was cheerful and playful; unlike most children, she sometimes withdrew into herself, trying to find out the hidden meanings behind the deep things that make up the puzzle and pain of human existence, which have confused and challenged those who seek answers throughout the ages. As a seven-year-old, she was troubled and baffled by the frustrating repetition of the typical incidents of our fleeting time here, just as these same issues have troubled older minds since the beginning of time. Countless people are born; they work hard and struggle for survival; they argue and fight; they claw for small advantages over each other; age sets in; illnesses follow; shames and humiliations crush their pride and vanity; those they love are taken away from them, turning the joy of life into deep sorrow. The weight of pain, worry, and misery grows heavier each year; eventually, ambition dies, pride dies; vanity dies; a longing for relief takes their place. It finally comes—the only pure gift the earth ever had for them—and they disappear from a world where they mattered little; where they achieved nothing; where their existence was a mistake, a failure, and foolishness; they leave no trace of having lived—a world that will mourn them for a day and forget them forever. Then another group takes their place, repeats all they did, and continues down the same fruitless road, disappearing as they did—making room for another, and another, and millions of others, to follow the same barren path through the same desert, accomplishing what the first group and all those that followed accomplished—nothing!
"Mamma, what is it all for?" asked Susy, preliminarily stating[Pg 584] the above details in her own halting language, after long brooding over them alone in the privacy of the nursery.
"Mama, what’s it all for?" asked Susy, tentatively expressing[Pg 584] the details in her own hesitant way, after thinking about them alone in the quiet of the nursery.
A year later, she was groping her way alone through another sunless bog, but this time she reached a rest for her feet. For a week, her mother had not been able to go to the nursery, evenings, at the child's prayer hour. She spoke of it—was sorry for it, and said she would come to-night, and hoped she could continue to come every night and hear Susy pray, as before. Noticing that the child wished to respond, but was evidently troubled as to how to word her answer, she asked what the difficulty was. Susy explained that Miss Foote (the governess) had been teaching her about the Indians and their religious beliefs, whereby it appeared that they had not only a God, but several. This had set Susy to thinking. As a result of this thinking, she had stopped praying. She qualified this statement—that is, she modified it—saying she did not now pray "in the same way" as she had formerly done. Her mother said:
A year later, she was feeling her way through another dark swamp alone, but this time she found a place to rest her feet. For a week, her mom hadn’t been able to go to the nursery during the child’s prayer time in the evenings. She talked about it—was sorry about it, and said she would come tonight, hoping to be able to come every night to hear Susy pray like before. Noticing that the child wanted to respond but seemed unsure how to phrase her answer, she asked what the problem was. Susy explained that Miss Foote (the governess) had been teaching her about the Indians and their religious beliefs, which turned out to include not just one God but several. This made Susy think. Because of this thinking, she had stopped praying. She clarified her statement—she added that she didn’t pray "the same way" as she used to. Her mom said:
"Tell me about it, dear."
"Tell me about it, babe."
"Well, mamma, the Indians believed they knew, but now we know they were wrong. By and by, it can turn out that we are wrong. So now I only pray that there may be a God and a Heaven—or something better."
"Well, mom, the Native Americans thought they knew, but now we know they were mistaken. Eventually, it could turn out that we’re wrong, too. So now I just hope there is a God and a Heaven—or something even better."
I wrote down this pathetic prayer in its precise wording, at the time, in a record which we kept of the children's sayings, and my reverence for it has grown with the years that have passed over my head since then. Its untaught grace and simplicity are a child's, but the wisdom and the pathos of it are of all the ages that have come and gone since the race of man has lived, and longed, and hoped, and feared, and doubted.
I wrote down this simple prayer exactly as it was at the time, in a record we kept of the children's sayings, and my respect for it has grown over the years since then. Its untrained grace and simplicity belong to a child, but the wisdom and emotion of it reflect the experiences of all the ages that have come and gone since humanity has lived, longed, hoped, feared, and doubted.
To go back a year—Susy aged seven. Several times her mother said to her:
To go back a year—Susy was seven. Her mom told her several times:
"There, there, Susy, you mustn't cry over little things."
"There, there, Susy, you shouldn't cry over small stuff."
This furnished Susy a text for thought She had been breaking her heart over what had seemed vast disasters—a broken toy; a picnic cancelled by thunder and lightning and rain; the mouse that was growing tame and friendly in the nursery caught and killed by the cat—and now came this strange revelation. For some unaccountable reason, these were not vast calamities. Why? How is the size of calamities measured? What is the rule? There must be some way to tell the great ones from the[Pg 585] small ones; what is the law of these proportions? She examined the problem earnestly and long. She gave it her best thought from time to time, for two or three days—but it baffled her—defeated her. And at last she gave up and went to her mother for help.
This gave Susy something to think about. She had been really upset over what seemed like huge disasters—a broken toy, a picnic ruined by thunder and lightning and rain, the mouse that was becoming tame and friendly in the nursery but was caught and killed by the cat—and now this strange realization hit her. For some reason, these weren’t huge calamities after all. Why? How do you measure the size of problems? What’s the rule? There has to be a way to distinguish the big problems from the small ones; what is the law of these proportions? She thought about it seriously for a long time. She gave it her best effort for a couple of days, but it perplexed her—left her stumped. Finally, she gave up and went to her mother for help.
"Mamma, what is 'little things'?"
"Mom, what are 'little things'?"
It seemed a simple question—at first. And yet, before the answer could be put into words, unsuspected and unforeseen difficulties began to appear. They increased; they multiplied; they brought about another defeat. The effort to explain came to a standstill. Then Susy tried to help her mother out—with an instance, an example, an illustration. The mother was getting ready to go down-town, and one of her errands was to buy a long-promised toy-watch for Susy.
It seemed like a straightforward question—at first. Yet, before the answer could be articulated, unexpected and unanticipated challenges started to emerge. They grew; they escalated; they led to another setback. The attempt to clarify hit a roadblock. Then Susy tried to assist her mom with a case, an example, an illustration. Mom was preparing to head downtown, and one of her tasks was to buy a long-promised toy watch for Susy.
"If you forgot the watch, mamma, would that be a little thing?"
"If you forgot the watch, mom, would that be a small thing?"
She was not concerned about the watch, for she knew it would not be forgotten. What she was hoping for was that the answer would unriddle the riddle, and bring rest and peace to her perplexed little mind.
She wasn’t worried about the watch because she knew it wouldn’t be forgotten. What she was really hoping for was that the answer would solve the puzzle and bring some calm and peace to her confused little mind.
The hope was disappointed, of course—for the reason that the size of a misfortune is not determinate by an outsider's measurement of it, but only by the measurements applied to it by the person specially affected by it. The king's lost crown is a vast matter to the king, but of no consequence to the child. The lost toy is a great matter to the child, but in the king's eyes it is not a thing to break the heart about. A verdict was reached, but it was based upon the above model, and Susy was granted leave to measure her disasters thereafter with her own tape-line.
The hope was obviously dashed—because the impact of a misfortune isn't determined by how outsiders perceive it, but by how the person directly affected views it. The king's lost crown is a huge deal to him, but it means nothing to the child. The lost toy is a big deal to the child, but to the king, it's not something worth getting upset over. A decision was made, but it followed this principle, allowing Susy to assess her troubles using her own standards from then on.
As a child, Susy had a passionate temper; and it cost her much remorse and many tears before she learned to govern it, but after that it was a wholesome salt, and her character was the stronger and healthier for its presence. It enabled her to be good with dignity; it preserved her not only from being good for vanity's sake, but from even the appearance of it. In looking back over the long vanished years, it seems but natural and excusable that I should dwell with longing affection and preference upon incidents of her young life which made it beautiful to us, and that I should let its few small offences go unsummoned and unreproached.
As a child, Susy had a fiery temper; it caused her a lot of regret and many tears before she learned to control it, but after that, it became a healthy part of her, and her character grew stronger and more resilient because of it. It allowed her to be good with dignity; it kept her from being good just for show and even from appearing that way. Looking back on those long-gone years, it feels natural and understandable that I should reflect with fondness and preference on the moments of her youth that made her so beautiful to us, and that I let her few minor mistakes go unmentioned and uncriticized.
In the summer of 1880, when Susy was just eight years of age,[Pg 586] the family were at Quarry Farm, as usual at that season of the year. Hay-cutting time was approaching, and Susy and Clara were counting the hours, for the time was big with a great event for them; they had been promised that they might mount the wagon and ride home from the fields on the summit of the hay mountain. This perilous privilege, so dear to their age and species, had never been granted them before. Their excitement had no bounds. They could talk of nothing but this epoch-making adventure, now. But misfortune overtook Susy on the very morning of the important day. In a sudden outbreak of passion, she corrected Clara—with a shovel, or stick, or something of the sort. At any rate, the offence committed was of a gravity clearly beyond the limit allowed in the nursery. In accordance with the rule and custom of the house, Susy went to her mother to confess, and to help decide upon the size and character of the punishment due. It was quite understood that, as a punishment could have but one rational object and function—to act as a reminder, and warn the transgressor against transgressing in the same way again—the children would know about as well as any how to choose a penalty which would be rememberable and effective. Susy and her mother discussed various punishments, but none of them seemed adequate. This fault was an unusually serious one, and required the setting up of a danger-signal in the memory that would not blow out nor burn out, but remain a fixture there and furnish its saving warning indefinitely. Among the punishments mentioned was deprivation of the hay-wagon ride. It was noticeable that this one hit Susy hard. Finally, in the summing up, the mother named over the list and asked:
In the summer of 1880, when Susy was just eight years old,[Pg 586] the family was at Quarry Farm, as usual during that time of year. Hay-cutting season was approaching, and Susy and Clara were eagerly counting down the hours, as this was a huge deal for them; they had been promised that they could ride home from the fields on top of the hay wagon. This thrilling opportunity, cherished by kids their age, had never been given to them before. Their excitement was through the roof. They could only talk about this groundbreaking adventure now. But then, disaster struck Susy on the very morning of this important day. In a sudden fit of anger, she corrected Clara—with a shovel, or stick, or something like that. At any rate, the offense was clearly serious enough to warrant serious consequences in the household. Following the family’s rules, Susy went to her mother to confess and to help determine the appropriate punishment. It was well understood that since punishment should serve as a reminder and a warning against repeating the same mistake, the kids would have a good idea of what kind of penalty would be memorable and effective. Susy and her mother discussed various punishments, but none seemed fitting. This was an unusually serious mistake, and it needed a lasting reminder that wouldn’t fade away or be forgotten but would serve as a persistent warning. Among the punishments suggested was the loss of the hay wagon ride. It was clear that this one affected Susy the most. Finally, as they concluded their discussion, her mother went over the list and asked:
"Which one do you think it ought to be, Susy?"
"Which one do you think it should be, Susy?"
Susy studied, shrank from her duty, and asked:
Susy studied, avoided her responsibility, and asked:
"Which do you think, mamma?"
"Which do you think, mom?"
"Well, Susy, I would rather leave it to you. You make the choice yourself."
"Well, Susy, I'd rather let you decide. You make the choice yourself."
It cost Susy a struggle, and much and deep thinking and weighing—but she came out where any one who knew her could have foretold she would.
It took Susy a lot of effort, along with some serious thinking and consideration—but she ended up where anyone who knew her could have predicted she would.
"Well, mamma, I'll make it the hay-wagon, because you know the other things might not make me remember not to do it again, but if I don't get to ride on the hay-wagon I can remember it easily."
"Well, Mom, I'll choose the hay-wagon because, you know, the other things might not help me remember not to do it again, but if I don't get to ride on the hay-wagon, I can easily remember it."
[Pg 587]In this world the real penalty, the sharp one, the lasting one, never falls otherwise than on the wrong person. It was not I that corrected Clara, but the remembrance of poor Susy's lost hay-ride still brings me a pang—after twenty-six years.
[Pg 587]In this world, the real punishment—the one that really hurts and sticks around—is always directed at the wrong person. It wasn’t me who corrected Clara, but the memory of poor Susy's lost hayride still stings me—even after twenty-six years.
Apparently, Susy was born with humane feelings for the animals, and compassion for their troubles. This enabled her to see a new point in an old story, once, when she was only six years old—a point which had been overlooked by older, and perhaps duller, people for many ages. Her mother told her the moving story of the sale of Joseph by his brethren, the staining of his coat with the blood of the slaughtered kid, and the rest of it. She dwelt upon the inhumanity of the brothers; their cruelty toward their helpless young brother; and the unbrotherly treachery which they practised upon him; for she hoped to teach the child a lesson in gentle pity and mercifulness which she would remember. Apparently, her desire was accomplished, for the tears came into Susy's eyes and she was deeply moved. Then she said:
Apparently, Susy was born with a deep compassion for animals and an understanding of their struggles. This allowed her to see a new perspective in an old story when she was just six years old—a perspective that had been missed by older, perhaps less sensitive, people for many years. Her mother shared the heartbreaking tale of Joseph being sold by his brothers, the blood-stained coat from the slaughtered kid, and everything else that followed. She focused on the brothers' cruelty and their betrayal of their defenseless younger sibling, hoping to instill in Susy a lesson about kindness and mercy that she would remember. Her goal seemed to be achieved, as tears filled Susy's eyes, and she was deeply touched. Then she said:
"Poor little kid!"
"Poor little kid!"
A child's frank envy of the privileges and distinctions of its elders is often a delicately flattering attention and the reverse of unwelcome, but sometimes the envy is not placed where the beneficiary is expecting it to be placed. Once, when Susy was seven, she sat breathlessly absorbed in watching a guest of ours adorn herself for a ball. The lady was charmed by this homage; this mute and gentle admiration; and was happy in it. And when her pretty labors were finished, and she stood at last perfect, unimprovable, clothed like Solomon in all his glory, she paused, confident and expectant, to receive from Susy's tongue the tribute that was burning in her eyes. Susy drew an envious little sigh and said:
A child's genuine envy of the advantages and status of their elders often translates into a kind of flattering attention that's not unwelcome. Yet sometimes, that envy is directed at a different person than what the recipient expects. Once, when Susy was seven, she sat captivated, watching one of our guests get ready for a ball. The woman was delighted by this admiration; this silent and gentle appreciation; and she enjoyed it. Once she had finished her beautiful preparations and appeared flawless, dressed like Solomon in all his glory, she paused, confident and waiting, for the praise she believed Susy was about to give. Susy let out a little envious sigh and said:
"I wish I could have crooked teeth and spectacles!"
"I wish I could have crooked teeth and glasses!"
Once, when Susy was six months along in her eighth year, she did something one day in the presence of company, which subjected her to criticism and reproof. Afterward, when she was alone with her mother, as was her custom she reflected a little while over the matter. Then she set up what I think—and what the shade of Burns would think—was a quite good philosophical defence.
Once, when Susy was six months into her eighth year, she did something one day in front of company that led to criticism and scolding. Later, when she was alone with her mother, she took a moment to think about it, as she usually did. Then she came up with what I believe—and what the spirit of Burns would agree—was a pretty solid philosophical defense.
"Well, mamma, you know I didn't see myself, and so I couldn't know how it looked."
"Well, Mom, you know I couldn't see myself, so I had no idea how I looked."
[Pg 588]In homes where the near friends and visitors are mainly literary people—lawyers, judges, professors and clergymen—the children's ears become early familiarized with wide vocabularies. It is natural for them to pick up any words that fall in their way; it is natural for them to pick up big and little ones indiscriminately; it is natural for them to use without fear any word that comes to their net, no matter how formidable it may be as to size. As a result, their talk is a curious and funny musketry clatter of little words, interrupted at intervals by the heavy artillery crash of a word of such imposing sound and size that it seems to shake the ground and rattle the windows. Sometimes the child gets a wrong idea of a word which it has picked up by chance, and attaches to it a meaning which impairs its usefulness—but this does not happen as often as one might expect it would. Indeed, it happens with an infrequency which may be regarded as remarkable. As a child, Susy had good fortune with her large words, and she employed many of them. She made no more than her fair share of mistakes. Once when she thought something very funny was going to happen (but it didn't), she was racked and torn with laughter, by anticipation. But, apparently, she still felt sure of her position, for she said, "If it had happened, I should have been transformed [transported] with glee."
[Pg 588]In homes where close friends and visitors are mostly literary types—lawyers, judges, professors, and clergymen—children quickly become familiar with a wide range of vocabularies. It’s natural for them to pick up any words around them; they indiscriminately grab both big and small ones, and they freely use any word they hear, no matter how daunting it may seem in size. As a result, their speech is a curious and amusing mix of small words, interrupted now and then by the heavy impact of a word with such impressive sound and size that it feels like it shakes the ground and rattles the windows. Sometimes, a child misinterprets a word they've casually picked up and assigns it a meaning that diminishes its usefulness—but this doesn’t happen as often as you might think. In fact, it’s quite rare. As a child, Susy was fortunate with her big words and used a lot of them. She made only her fair share of mistakes. Once, when she anticipated something very funny was going to happen (but it didn’t), she laughed uproariously in anticipation. Still, she seemed confident in her choice of words, saying, "If it had happened, I would have been transported with glee."
And earlier, when she was a little maid of five years, she informed a visitor that she had been in a church only once, and that was the time when Clara was "crucified" [christened]....
And earlier, when she was a little girl of five, she told a visitor that she had only been to a church once, and that was when Clara was "crucified" [christened]....
In Heidelberg, when Susy was six, she noticed that the Schloss gardens were populous with snails creeping all about everywhere. One day she found a new dish on her table and inquired concerning it, and learned that it was made of snails. She was awed and impressed, and said:
In Heidelberg, when Susy was six, she noticed that the Schloss gardens were full of snails crawling all over the place. One day, she found a new dish on her table and asked about it, and learned that it was made of snails. She was amazed and impressed, and said:
"Wild ones, mamma?"
"Wild ones, mom?"
She was thoughtful and considerate of others—an acquired quality, no doubt. No one seems to be born with it. One hot day, at home in Hartford, when she was a little child, her mother borrowed her fan several times (a Japanese one, value five cents), refreshed herself with it a moment or two, then handed it back with a word of thanks. Susy knew her mother would use the fan all the time if she could do it without putting a deprivation upon its owner. She also knew that her mother could not be[Pg 589] persuaded to do that. A relief most be devised somehow; Susy devised it. She got five cents out of her money-box and carried it to Patrick, and asked him to take it down-town (a mile and a half) and buy a Japanese fan and bring it home. He did it—and thus thoughtfully and delicately was the exigency met and the mother's comfort secured. It is to the child's credit that she did not save herself expense by bringing down another and more costly kind of fan from up-stairs, but was content to act upon the impression that her mother desired the Japanese kind—content to accomplish the desire and stop with that, without troubling about the wisdom or unwisdom of it.
She was thoughtful and considerate of others—something you definitely learn over time. No one seems to be born with it. One hot day, while at home in Hartford, when she was just a little kid, her mom borrowed her fan several times (a Japanese one, worth five cents), used it to cool off for a moment, then handed it back with a thank you. Susy knew her mom would use the fan all the time if she could do it without taking away from its owner. She also knew that her mom wouldn't be persuaded to do that. A solution needed to be found; Susy figured it out. She took five cents from her piggy bank and asked Patrick to take it downtown (a mile and a half away) and buy a Japanese fan to bring back home. He did it—and that’s how the issue was thoughtfully and delicately resolved, ensuring her mom's comfort. It speaks well of the child that she didn't save money by bringing down another, more expensive type of fan from upstairs, but instead was happy to act on the impression that her mom wanted the Japanese kind—content to fulfill that wish and leave it at that, without worrying about whether it was the right choice or not.
Sometimes, while she was still a child, her speech fell into quaint and strikingly expressive forms. Once—aged nine or ten—she came to her mother's room, when her sister Jean was a baby, and said Jean was crying in the nursery, and asked if she might ring for the nurse. Her mother asked:
Sometimes, when she was still a child, her speech took on charming and noticeably expressive forms. Once—around nine or ten—she went to her mother’s room, where her sister Jean was a baby, and said Jean was crying in the nursery, and asked if she could call for the nurse. Her mother asked:
"Is she crying hard?"—meaning cross, ugly.
"Is she crying really hard?"—meaning mad, unattractive.
"Well, no, mamma. It is a weary, lonesome cry."
"Well, no, mom. It’s a tired, lonely cry."
It is a pleasure to me to recall various incidents which reveal the delicacies of feeling that were so considerable a part of her budding character. Such a revelation came once in a way which, while creditable to her heart, was defective in another direction. She was in her eleventh year then. Her mother had been making the Christmas purchases, and she allowed Susy to see the presents which were for Patrick's children. Among these was a handsome sled for Jimmy, on which a stag was painted; also, in gilt capitals, the word "Deer." Susy was excited and joyous over everything, until she came to this sled. Then she became sober and silent—yet the sled was the choicest of all the gifts. Her mother was surprised, and also disappointed, and said:
It brings me joy to remember different moments that show the sensitivities that were such a significant part of her developing character. One such moment came in a way that, while it reflected well on her heart, lacked a bit in other aspects. She was eleven at the time. Her mom had been doing the Christmas shopping and let Susy see the gifts meant for Patrick's kids. Among them was a beautiful sled for Jimmy, decorated with a painting of a stag and the word "Deer" in gold letters. Susy was excited and happy about everything until she saw this sled. Then she fell quiet and serious—even though the sled was the best of all the gifts. Her mom was surprised and a little let down, and she said:
"Why, Susy, doesn't it please you? Isn't it fine?"
"Why, Susy, don’t you like it? Isn’t it great?"
Susy hesitated, and it was plain that she did not want to say the thing that was in her mind. However, being urged, she brought it haltingly out:
Susy hesitated, and it was clear that she didn’t want to say what was on her mind. However, when pressed, she slowly shared it:
"Well, mamma, it is fine, and of course it did cost a good deal—but—but—why should that be mentioned?"
"Well, mom, it is nice, and of course it did cost a lot—but—but—why do we need to talk about that?"
Seeing that she was not understood, she reluctantly pointed to that word "Deer." It was her orthography that was at fault, not her heart. She had inherited both from her mother.
Seeing that she wasn't understood, she reluctantly pointed to that word "Deer." It was her spelling that was at fault, not her feelings. She had inherited both from her mother.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCI.
OCTOBER 19, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—IV.
BY MARK TWAIN.
When Susy was thirteen, and was a slender little maid with plaited tails of copper-tinged brown hair down her back, and was perhaps the busiest bee in the household hive, by reason of the manifold studies, health exercises and recreations she had to attend to, she secretly, and of her own motion, and out of love, added another task to her labors—the writing of a biography of me. She did this work in her bedroom at night, and kept her record hidden. After a little, the mother discovered it and filched it, and let me see it; then told Susy what she had done, and how pleased I was, and how proud. I remember that time with a deep[Pg 706] pleasure. I had had compliments before, but none that touched me like this; none that could approach it for value in my eyes. It has kept that place always since. I have had no compliment, no praise, no tribute from any source, that was so precious to me as this one was and still is. As I read it now, after all these many years, it is still a king's message to me, and brings me the same dear surprise it brought me then—with the pathos added, of the thought that the eager and hasty hand that sketched it and scrawled it will not touch mine again—and I feel as the humble and unexpectant must feel when their eyes fall upon the edict that raises them to the ranks of the noble.
When Susy was thirteen, a slim girl with braided copper-brown hair down her back, she was probably the busiest person in the house, juggling her many studies, health exercises, and activities. On her own accord and out of love, she took on another project—writing a biography about me. She worked on it in her bedroom at night and kept it a secret. After a while, our mother found it, took it, and showed it to me; then she told Susy what she had done, how happy it made me, and how proud I was. I cherish that memory deeply. I had received compliments before, but none touched me like that one; none ever had such value in my eyes. It has held that significance ever since. I've never received a compliment, praise, or tribute from anywhere that was as precious to me as this one was and still is. As I read it now, after all these years, it still feels like a royal message to me and gives me the same warm surprise it did back then—now mixed with the sadness that the eager, trembling hand that wrote it will never touch mine again—and I feel like those who are humble and unassuming must feel when they come across the decree that elevates them to nobility.
Yesterday while I was rummaging in a pile of ancient note-books of mine which I had not seen for years, I came across a reference to that biography. It is quite evident that several times, at breakfast and dinner, in those long-past days, I was posing for the biography. In fact, I clearly remember that I was doing that—and I also remember that Susy detected it. I remember saying a very smart thing, with a good deal of an air, at the breakfast-table one morning, and that Susy observed to her mother privately, a little later, that papa was doing that for the biography.
Yesterday, while I was going through a stack of old notebooks I hadn’t looked at in years, I found a mention of that biography. It’s pretty clear that several times, at breakfast and dinner, back in the day, I was posing for it. In fact, I distinctly remember doing that—and I also recall that Susy caught on. I remember saying something really clever, with quite a bit of flair, at the breakfast table one morning, and later, Susy mentioned to her mom that Dad was acting that way for the biography.
I cannot bring myself to change any line or word in Susy's sketch of me, but will introduce passages from it now and then just as they came in their quaint simplicity out of her honest heart, which was the beautiful heart of a child. What comes from that source has a charm and grace of its own which may transgress all the recognized laws of literature, if it choose, and yet be literature still, and worthy of hospitality. I shall print the whole of this little biography, before I have done with it—every word, every sentence.
I can’t bring myself to change any line or word in Susy’s sketch of me, but I will share excerpts from it now and then, just as they came out in their charming simplicity from her genuine heart, which was the beautiful heart of a child. What comes from that source has its own charm and grace that might break all the usual rules of writing, if it wants to, and still be literature, deserving of a welcome. I will print the entire little biography before I’m done with it—every word, every sentence.
The spelling is frequently desperate, but it was Susy's, and it shall stand. I love it, and cannot profane it. To me, it is gold. To correct it would alloy it, not refine it. It would spoil it. It would take from it its freedom and flexibility and make it stiff and formal. Even when it is most extravagant I am not shocked. It is Susy's spelling, and she was doing the best she could—and nothing could better it for me....
The spelling is often pretty rough, but it was Susy’s, and it will stay as is. I love it and can’t undermine it. To me, it’s like gold. Correcting it would tarnish it, not improve it. It would ruin it. It would strip away its freedom and flexibility and make it rigid and formal. Even when it’s at its most outrageous, I’m not offended. It’s Susy’s spelling, and she was doing her best—and nothing could be better for me...
Susy began the biography in 1885, when I was in the fiftieth year of my age, and she just entering the fourteenth of hers. She begins in this way:[Pg 707]
Susy started the biography in 1885, when I was 50 years old and she was just turning 14. She begins like this:[Pg 707]
We are a very happy family. We consist of Papa, Mamma, Jean, Clara and me. It is papa I am writing about, and I shall have no trouble in not knowing what to say about him, as he is a very striking character.
We’re a really happy family. There’s Dad, Mom, Jean, Clara, and me. I’m writing about Dad, and I won’t have a hard time finding things to say about him because he’s a really interesting person.
But wait a minute—I will return to Susy presently.
But hold on—I’ll get back to Susy shortly.
In the matter of slavish imitation, man is the monkey's superior all the time. The average man is destitute of independence of opinion. He is not interested in contriving an opinion of his own, by study and reflection, but is only anxious to find out what his neighbor's opinion is and slavishly adopt it. A generation ago, I found out that the latest review of a book was pretty sure to be just a reflection of the earliest review of it; that whatever the first reviewer found to praise or censure in the book would be repeated in the latest reviewer's report, with nothing fresh added. Therefore more than once I took the precaution of sending my book, in manuscript, to Mr. Howells, when he was editor of the "Atlantic Monthly," so that he could prepare a review of it at leisure. I knew he would say the truth about the book—I also knew that he would find more merit than demerit in it, because I already knew that that was the condition of the book. I allowed no copy of it to go out to the press until after Mr. Howells's notice of it had appeared. That book was always safe. There wasn't a man behind a pen in all America that had the courage to find anything in the book which Mr. Howells had not found—there wasn't a man behind a pen in America that had spirit enough to say a brave and original thing about the book on his own responsibility.
When it comes to copying others, humans are always better than monkeys. The average person lacks independent thought. They aren’t interested in forming their own opinions through study and reflection; they just want to find out what others think and blindly adopt it. A generation ago, I discovered that the latest review of a book was likely just a repeat of the first review; whatever the first reviewer praised or criticized about the book would show up again in the latest review, with nothing new added. So, more than once, I made sure to send my manuscript to Mr. Howells when he was the editor of the "Atlantic Monthly," so he could review it at his convenience. I knew he would tell the truth about the book, and I also knew he would find more good than bad in it because I was already aware of the book's qualities. I made sure no copies were sent to the press until after Mr. Howells’s review was published. That book was always safe. No one in America had the courage to find anything in it that Mr. Howells hadn't already discovered—there wasn’t a single person with the guts to say something brave and original about the book on their own.
I believe that the trade of critic, in literature, music, and the drama, is the most degraded of all trades, and that it has no real value—certainly no large value. When Charles Dudley Warner and I were about to bring out "The Gilded Age," the editor of the "Daily Graphic" persuaded me to let him have an advance copy, he giving me his word of honor that no notice of it would appear in his paper until after the "Atlantic Monthly" notice should have appeared. This reptile published a review of the book within three days afterward. I could not really complain, because he had only given me his word of honor as security; I ought to have required of him something substantial. I believe his notice did not deal mainly with the merit of the book, or the lack of it, but with my moral attitude toward the public. It was[Pg 708] charged that I had used my reputation to play a swindle upon the public; that Mr. Warner had written as much as half of the book, and that I had used my name to float it and give it currency; a currency—so the critic averred—which it could not have acquired without my name, and that this conduct of mine was a grave fraud upon the people. The "Graphic" was not an authority upon any subject whatever. It had a sort of distinction, in that it was the first and only illustrated daily newspaper that the world had seen; but it was without character; it was poorly and cheaply edited; its opinion of a book or of any other work of art was of no consequence. Everybody knew this, yet all the critics in America, one after the other, copied the "Graphic's" criticism, merely changing the phraseology, and left me under that charge of dishonest conduct. Even the great Chicago "Tribune," the most important journal in the Middle West, was not able to invent anything fresh, but adopted the view of the humble "Daily Graphic," dishonesty-charge and all.
I think that being a critic in literature, music, and theater is the lowest profession of all, with little to no real value. When Charles Dudley Warner and I were about to release "The Gilded Age," the editor of the "Daily Graphic" convinced me to give him an advance copy, promising that no review would be published until after the "Atlantic Monthly" had released its notice. This guy published a review of the book just three days later. I couldn’t really complain because he only gave me his word as security; I should have asked for something more solid. I believe his review focused less on the book's merits or flaws and more on my moral stance towards the public. He accused me of leveraging my reputation to deceive the public; that Mr. Warner had written as much as half of the book, and that I used my name to promote it and give it credibility—a credibility, according to the critic, that it wouldn’t have had without my name. He claimed that my actions were a serious fraud on the public. The "Graphic" had no authority on any subject. It had some distinction as the first and only illustrated daily newspaper the world had seen, but it lacked character and was poorly and cheaply edited; its opinion on any book or artwork meant nothing. Everybody knew this, yet all the critics in America repeated the "Graphic's" criticism, just rephrasing it, and left me facing those accusations of dishonest behavior. Even the influential Chicago "Tribune," the leading newspaper in the Midwest, couldn’t come up with anything original and simply echoed the "Daily Graphic's" dishonest claims.
However, let it go. It is the will of God that we must have critics, and missionaries, and Congressmen, and humorists, and we must bear the burden. Meantime, I seem to have been drifting into criticism myself. But that is nothing. At the worst, criticism is nothing more than a crime, and I am not unused to that.
However, just let it go. It’s God’s will that we have critics, missionaries, Congress members, and humorists, and we have to deal with it. In the meantime, I feel like I’ve been slipping into criticism myself. But that doesn’t matter. At its worst, criticism is just a minor offense, and I’m not new to that.
What I have been travelling toward all this time is this: the first critic that ever had occasion to describe my personal appearance littered his description with foolish and inexcusable errors whose aggregate furnished the result that I was distinctly and distressingly unhandsome. That description floated around the country in the papers, and was in constant use and wear for a quarter of a century. It seems strange to me that apparently no critic in the country could be found who could look at me and have the courage to take up his pen and destroy that lie. That lie began its course on the Pacific coast, in 1864, and it likened me in personal appearance to Petroleum V. Nasby, who had been out there lecturing. For twenty-five years afterward, no critic could furnish a description of me without fetching in Nasby to help out my portrait. I knew Nasby well, and he was a good fellow, but in my life I have not felt malignant enough about any more than three persons to charge those persons with resembling Nasby. It hurts me to the heart. I was always hand[Pg 709]some. Anybody but a critic could have seen it. And it had long been a distress to my family—including Susy—that the critics should go on making this wearisome mistake, year after year, when there was no foundation for it. Even when a critic wanted to be particularly friendly and complimentary to me, he didn't dare to go beyond my clothes. He never ventured beyond that old safe frontier. When he had finished with my clothes he had said all the kind things, the pleasant things, the complimentary things he could risk. Then he dropped back on Nasby.
What I've been traveling toward all this time is this: the first critic who had the chance to describe my appearance filled his description with silly and unacceptable mistakes, making it clear that I was distinctly and painfully unattractive. That description circulated throughout the country in the papers and was frequently referenced for twenty-five years. It's strange to me that no critic in the country could step up, look at me, and have the guts to grab a pen and change that falsehood. That falsehood started back on the Pacific coast in 1864 and compared my looks to Petroleum V. Nasby, who had been out there giving lectures. For twenty-five years afterwards, no critic could describe me without dragging in Nasby to help paint my picture. I knew Nasby well, and he was a good guy, but I've never felt resentful enough to say more than three people resembled him. It crushes me. I was always good-looking. Anyone except a critic could have seen it. And it had long distressed my family—including Susy—that the critics kept making this tiring mistake, year after year, with no basis for it. Even when a critic wanted to be especially friendly and complimentary, he wouldn't dare go beyond my clothes. He never ventured past that old safe boundary. Once he wrapped up his comments on my clothes, he had said all the nice things, the pleasant things, the complimentary things he could take a chance with. Then he fell back on Nasby.
Yesterday I found this clipping in the pocket of one of those ancient memorandum-books of mine. It is of the date of thirty-nine years ago, and both the paper and the ink are yellow with the bitterness that I felt in that old day when I clipped it out to preserve it and brood over it, and grieve about it. I will copy it here, to wit:
Yesterday, I found this clipping in the pocket of one of my old memo books. It’s dated thirty-nine years ago, and both the paper and the ink are yellowed with the bitterness I felt back then when I cut it out to keep and think about it, and to mourn over it. I’ll copy it here:
A correspondent of the Philadelphia "Press," writing of one of Schuyler Colfax's receptions, says of our Washington correspondent: "Mark Twain, the delicate humorist, was present: quite a lion, as he deserves to be. Mark is a bachelor, faultless in taste, whose snowy vest is suggestive of endless quarrels with Washington washerwomen; but the heroism of Mark is settled for all time, for such purity and smoothness were never seen before. His lavender gloves might have been stolen from some Turkish harem, so delicate were they in size; but more likely—anything else were more likely than that. In form and feature he bears some resemblance to the immortal Nasby; but whilst Petroleum is brunette to the core, Twain is golden, amber-hued, melting, blonde."
A writer for the Philadelphia "Press" discussing one of Schuyler Colfax's receptions mentions our Washington correspondent: "Mark Twain, the witty humorist, was there and really stood out, as he should. Mark is a bachelor with great taste, and his white vest makes it seem like he's had countless arguments with Washington washerwomen; but Mark's reputation is solid, as such purity and smoothness have never been seen before. His lavender gloves could have come from a Turkish harem, they were so delicate; but it’s more likely that anything else is more plausible than that. In terms of looks, he resembles the famous Nasby; but while Petroleum is a deep brunette, Twain has a golden hue with warm, amber-blonde tones."
Let us return to Susy's biography now, and get the opinion of one who is unbiassed:
Let’s go back to Susy's biography now and hear from someone who isn’t biased:
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Papa's appearance has been described many times, but very incorrectly. He has beautiful gray hair, not any too thick or any too long, but just right; a Roman nose, which greatly improves the beauty of his features; kind blue eyes and a small mustache. He has a wonderfully shaped head and profile. He has a very good figure—in short, he is an extrodinarily fine looking man. All his features are perfect, except that he hasn't extrodinary teeth. His complexion is very fair, and he doesn't ware a beard. He is a very good man and a very funny one. He hasgot a temper, but we all of us have in this family. He is the loveliest man I ever saw or ever hope to see—and oh, so absent-minded. He does tell perfectly delightful stories. Clara and I used to sit on each arm of his chair and listen while he told us stories about the pictures on the wall.
Papa's appearance has been described many times, but often inaccurately. He has beautiful gray hair, neither too thick nor too long, but just right; a Roman nose that strongly enhances his features; kind blue eyes and a small mustache. He has a wonderfully shaped head and profile. He has a great figure—in short, he is an extraordinarily good-looking man. All his features are perfect, except for his ordinary teeth. His complexion is very fair, and he doesn’t have a beard. He is a genuinely good man and quite funny. He does have a temper, but we all do in this family. He is the loveliest man I’ve ever seen or hope to see—and oh, so absent-minded. He tells absolutely delightful stories. Clara and I used to sit on each arm of his chair and listen as he shared stories about the pictures on the wall.
[Pg 710]I remember the story-telling days vividly. They were a difficult and exacting audience—those little creatures.
[Pg 710]I remember the days of storytelling clearly. They were a tough and demanding audience—those little ones.
Along one side of the library, in the Hartford home, the bookshelves joined the mantelpiece—in fact there were shelves on both sides of the mantelpiece. On these shelves, and on the mantelpiece, stood various ornaments. At one end of the procession was a framed oil-painting of a cat's head, at the other end was a head of a beautiful young girl, life-size—called Emmeline, because she looked just about like that—an impressionist water-color. Between the one picture and the other there were twelve or fifteen of the bric-à-brac things already mentioned; also an oil-painting by Elihu Vedder, "The Young Medusa." Every now and then the children required me to construct a romance—always impromptu—not a moment's preparation permitted—and into that romance I had to get all that bric-à-brac and the three pictures. I had to start always with the cat and finish with Emmeline. I was never allowed the refreshment of a change, end-for-end. It was not permissible to introduce a bric-à-brac ornament into the story out of its place in the procession.
Along one side of the library in the Hartford home, the bookshelves connected with the mantelpiece—in fact, there were shelves on both sides of it. On these shelves and on the mantel, various ornaments were displayed. At one end was a framed oil painting of a cat's head, and at the other was a life-size portrait of a beautiful young girl named Emmeline, who looked just like that—an impressionist watercolor. Between the two pictures were twelve or fifteen of the previously mentioned decorative items, along with an oil painting by Elihu Vedder titled "The Young Medusa." Every now and then, the kids would ask me to come up with a story—always on the spot—no time for preparation allowed—and I had to include all that decorative stuff and the three pictures. I always had to start with the cat and end with Emmeline. I was never allowed the refreshment of switching the order. It wasn’t allowed to introduce a decorative item into the story out of its place in the lineup.
These bric-à-bracs were never allowed a peaceful day, a reposeful day, a restful Sabbath. In their lives there was no Sabbath, in their lives there was no peace; they knew no existence but a monotonous career of violence and bloodshed. In the course of time, the bric-à-brac and the pictures showed wear. It was because they had had so many and such tumultuous adventures in their romantic careers.
These knick-knacks were never given a quiet day, a relaxing day, or a restful Sunday. There was no Sunday in their lives, no peace for them; they experienced nothing but a dull routine of violence and bloodshed. Over time, the knick-knacks and the pictures showed signs of wear. It was because they had gone through so many chaotic adventures in their dramatic lives.
As romancer to the children I had a hard time, even from the beginning. If they brought me a picture, in a magazine, and required me to build a story to it, they would cover the rest of the page with their pudgy hands to keep me from stealing an idea from it. The stories had to come hot from the bat, always. They had to be absolutely original and fresh. Sometimes the children furnished me simply a character or two, or a dozen, and required me to start out at once on that slim basis and deliver those characters up to a vigorous and entertaining life of crime. If they heard of a new trade, or an unfamiliar animal, or anything like that, I was pretty sure to have to deal with those things in the next romance. Once Clara required me to build a sudden tale out of a plumber and a "bawgunstrictor," and I had to do it. She[Pg 711] didn't know what a boa-constrictor was, until he developed in the tale—then she was better satisfied with it than ever.
As a storyteller for the kids, I had a tough time right from the start. If they showed me a picture in a magazine and wanted me to create a story around it, they would cover the rest of the page with their chubby little hands to prevent me from taking any ideas. The stories had to come straight from my imagination, always. They had to be completely original and fresh. Sometimes the kids would just give me a character or two, or even a whole bunch, and expect me to immediately start crafting a lively and entertaining tale about them. If they learned about a new profession, or saw an unusual animal, or anything like that, I knew I would have to incorporate those elements into my next story. One time, Clara asked me to whip up a quick story about a plumber and a "bawgunstrictor," and I had to do it. She didn’t even know what a boa constrictor was until it appeared in the story—then she was happier with it than ever.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Papa's favorite game is billiards, and when he is tired and wishes to rest himself he stays up all night and plays billiards, it seems to rest his head. He smokes a great deal almost incessantly. He has the mind of an author exactly, some of the simplest things he cant understand. Our burglar-alarm is often out of order, and papa had been obliged to take the mahogany-room off from the alarm altogether for a time, because the burglar-alarm had been in the habit of ringing even when the mahogany-room was closed. At length he thought that perhaps the burglar-alarm might be in order, and he decided to try and see; accordingly he put it on and then went down and opened the window; consequently the alarm bell rang, it would even if the alarm had been in order. Papa went despairingly upstairs and said to mamma, "Livy the mahogany-room won't go on. I have just opened the window to see."
Dad's favorite game is billiards, and when he’s tired and wants to relax, he stays up all night playing. It seems to help him unwind. He smokes a lot, almost constantly. He thinks like a writer but struggles with some of the simplest things. Our burglar alarm often malfunctions, and Dad had to disconnect the mahogany room from the alarm for a while because it would go off even when the room was closed. Eventually, he thought the alarm might be working again, so he decided to give it a try; he turned it on and then went downstairs to open the window. Of course, the alarm went off, even if it had been functioning properly. Dad went back upstairs feeling defeated and said to Mom, "Livy, the mahogany room won’t turn on. I just opened the window to check."
"Why, Youth," mamma replied "if you've opened the window, why of coarse the alarm will ring!"
"Well, Youth," Mom replied, "if you've opened the window, of course the alarm will ring!"
"That's what I've opened it for, why I just went down to see if it would ring!"
"That's why I opened it, to check if it would ring!"
Mamma tried to explain to papa that when he wanted to go and see whether the alarm would ring while the window was closed he mustn't go and open the window—but in vain, papa couldn't understand, and got very impatient with mamma for trying to make him believe an impossible thing true.
Mom tried to explain to Dad that when he wanted to see if the alarm would ring while the window was closed he shouldn't go and open the window—but it was pointless, Dad couldn't grasp it and got really impatient with Mom for trying to make him accept something he thought was impossible.
This is a frank biographer, and an honest one; she uses no sand-paper on me. I have, to this day, the same dull head in the matter of conundrums and perplexities which Susy had discovered in those long-gone days. Complexities annoy me; they irritate me; then this progressive feeling presently warms into anger. I cannot get far in the reading of the commonest and simplest contract—with its "parties of the first part," and "parties of the second part," and "parties of the third part,"—before my temper is all gone. Ashcroft comes up here every day and pathetically tries to make me understand the points of the lawsuit which we are conducting against Henry Butters, Harold Wheeler, and the rest of those Plasmon buccaneers, but daily he has to give it up. It is pitiful to see, when he bends his earnest and appealing eyes upon me and says, after one of his efforts, "Now you do understand that, don't you?"
This biographer is direct and truthful; she doesn't sugarcoat anything about me. Even now, I still struggle with riddles and puzzles just like Susy noticed all those years ago. Complicated things frustrate me; they get under my skin, and soon that irritation turns into anger. I can't even get through the most basic contract—with its "parties of the first part," "parties of the second part," and "parties of the third part"—before I lose my patience. Ashcroft comes here every day and desperately tries to explain the details of the lawsuit we're filing against Henry Butters, Harold Wheeler, and those Plasmon pirates, but every day he has to give up. It's sad to watch him look at me with his sincere eyes and ask after one of his attempts, "Now you do understand that, don't you?"
I am always obliged to say, "I don't, Ashcroft. I wish I could understand it, but I don't. Send for the cat."
I always have to say, "I don't, Ashcroft. I wish I could understand it, but I can't. Call for the cat."
[Pg 712]In the days which Susy is talking about, a perplexity fell to my lot one day. F. G. Whitmore was my business agent, and he brought me out from town in his buggy. We drove by the porte-cochère and toward the stable. Now this was a single road, and was like a spoon whose handle stretched from the gate to a great round flower-bed in the neighborhood of the stable. At the approach to the flower-bed the road divided and circumnavigated it, making a loop, which I have likened to the bowl of the spoon. As we neared the loop, I saw that Whitmore was laying his course to port, (I was sitting on the starboard side—the side the house was on), and was going to start around that spoon-bowl on that left-hand side. I said,
[Pg 712]Back in the days Susy is talking about, I found myself in a bit of a dilemma one day. F. G. Whitmore was my business agent, and he picked me up from town in his buggy. We passed by the porte-cochère and headed towards the stable. This was a single road, shaped like a spoon with its handle stretching from the gate to a large round flower bed near the stable. As we got close to the flower bed, the road split and went around it, creating a loop that I compared to the bowl of a spoon. As we approached the loop, I noticed that Whitmore was steering to the left (I was sitting on the right side—where the house was), and was set to go around that spoon-bowl on the left side. I said,
"Don't do that, Whitmore; take the right-hand side. Then I shall be next to the house when we get to the door."
"Don't do that, Whitmore; take the right side. That way, I'll be next to the house when we reach the door."
He said, "That will not happen in any case, it doesn't make any difference which way I go around this flower-bed."
He said, "That won't happen regardless, it doesn't matter which way I go around this flower bed."
I explained to him that he was an ass, but he stuck to his proposition, and I said,
I told him he was being a jerk, but he held onto his idea, and I said,
"Go on and try it, and see."
"Go ahead and try it, and see."
He went on and tried it, and sure enough he fetched me up at the door on the very side that he had said I would be. I was not able to believe it then, and I don't believe it yet.
He went ahead and tried it, and sure enough, he picked me up at the door on the exact side he said I would be. I couldn't believe it then, and I still don’t believe it now.
I said, "Whitmore, that is merely an accident. You can't do it again."
I said, "Whitmore, that was just a fluke. You won't be able to do it again."
He said he could—and he drove down into the street, fetched around, came back, and actually did it again. I was stupefied, paralyzed, petrified, with these strange results, but they did not convince me. I didn't believe he could do it another time, but he did. He said he could do it all day, and fetch up the same way every time. By that time my temper was gone, and I asked him to go home and apply to the Asylum and I would pay the expenses; I didn't want to see him any more for a week.
He said he could—and he drove down the street, turned around, came back, and actually did it again. I was shocked, frozen, bewildered by these strange results, but they didn’t convince me. I didn’t believe he could do it again, but he did. He claimed he could do it all day and come back the same way every time. By then, my patience was gone, and I told him to go home and check into a mental hospital, and I would cover the expenses; I didn’t want to see him for a week.
I went up-stairs in a rage and started to tell Livy about it, expecting to get her sympathy for me and to breed aversion in her for Whitmore; but she merely burst into peal after peal of laughter, as the tale of my adventure went on, for her head was like Susy's: riddles and complexities had no terrors for it. Her mind and Susy's were analytical; I have tried to make it appear that mine was different. Many and many a time I have told that buggy experiment, hoping against hope that I would some time[Pg 713] or other find somebody who would be on my side, but it has never happened. And I am never able to go glibly forward and state the circumstances of that buggy's progress without having to halt and consider, and call up in my mind the spoon-handle, the bowl of the spoon, the buggy and the horse, and my position in the buggy: and the minute I have got that far and try to turn it to the left it goes to ruin; I can't see how it is ever going to fetch me out right when we get to the door. Susy is right in her estimate. I can't understand things.
I went upstairs in a rage and started to tell Livy about it, hoping to get her sympathy and make her dislike Whitmore; but she just erupted in laughter as I recounted my adventure, because her mind was like Susy's: riddles and complexities didn't scare her at all. Both of their minds were analytical; I've tried to convince myself that mine is different. Time and time again, I’ve shared that buggy experience, hoping that one day I would find someone who would be on my side, but it has never happened. I can never easily explain the circumstances of that buggy's progress without having to stop and think, recalling the spoon-handle, the bowl of the spoon, the buggy, and the horse, and my position in the buggy: and the moment I get that far and try to turn it left, everything goes wrong; I can't see how it will ever turn out right when we reach the door. Susy is right about me. I can't understand things.
That burglar-alarm which Susy mentions led a gay and careless life, and had no principles. It was generally out of order at one point or another; and there was plenty of opportunity, because all the windows and doors in the house, from the cellar up to the top floor, were connected with it. However, in its seasons of being out of order it could trouble us for only a very little while: we quickly found out that it was fooling us, and that it was buzzing its blood-curdling alarm merely for its own amusement. Then we would shut it off, and send to New York for the electrician—there not being one in all Hartford in those days. When the repairs were finished we would set the alarm again and reestablish our confidence in it. It never did any real business except upon one single occasion. All the rest of its expensive career was frivolous and without purpose. Just that one time it performed its duty, and its whole duty—gravely, seriously, admirably. It let fly about two o'clock one black and dreary March morning, and I turned out promptly, because I knew that it was not fooling, this time. The bath-room door was on my side of the bed. I stepped in there, turned up the gas, looked at the annunciator, and turned off the alarm—so far as the door indicated was concerned—thus stopping the racket. Then I came back to bed. Mrs. Clemens opened the debate:
That burglar alarm that Susy talks about had a carefree and reckless attitude, and it lacked any principles. It was usually malfunctioning at some point; and there were plenty of chances for that since all the windows and doors in the house, from the basement to the top floor, were linked to it. However, during its malfunctions, it could only annoy us for a short time: we quickly figured out that it was just messing with us, and that it was blaring its terrifying alarm purely for entertainment. We would then turn it off and call an electrician in New York—since there wasn't one in Hartford back then. Once the repairs were done, we would reset the alarm and regain our trust in it. It never really worked properly except for one single time. The rest of its costly existence was pointless and trivial. On that one occasion, it did its job—seriously and admirably. It went off around two o'clock on a dark and gloomy March morning, and I got up promptly because I knew this time it wasn't just playing around. The bathroom door was on my side of the bed. I went in, turned on the gas, checked the annunciator, and turned off the alarm—at least as far as the door indicated—thus silencing the noise. Then I went back to bed. Mrs. Clemens started the discussion:
"What was it?"
"What was that?"
"It was the cellar door."
"It was the basement door."
"Was it a burglar, do you think?"
"Do you think it was a burglar?"
"Yes," I said, "of course it was. Did you suppose it was a Sunday-school superintendent?"
"Yeah," I said, "of course it was. Did you think it was a Sunday school superintendent?"
"No. What do you suppose he wants?"
"No. What do you think he wants?"
"I suppose he wants jewelry, but he is not acquainted with the house and he thinks it is in the cellar. I don't like to disappoint a burglar whom I am not acquainted with, and who has done me[Pg 714] no harm, but if he had had common sagacity enough to inquire, I could have told him we kept nothing down there but coal and vegetables. Still it may be that he is acquainted with the place, and that what he really wants is coal and vegetables. On the whole, I think it is vegetables he is after."
"I guess he wants jewelry, but he doesn't know the house and thinks it's in the basement. I don't like to disappoint a burglar I'm not familiar with, especially one who hasn't hurt me[Pg 714], but if he had been smart enough to ask, I could have told him we only keep coal and vegetables down there. Still, maybe he does know the place, and what he actually wants is coal and vegetables. Overall, I think he's after vegetables."
"Are you going down to see?"
"Are you going to check it out?"
"No; I could not be of any assistance. Let him select for himself; I don't know where the things are."
"No, I can't help at all. He should pick for himself; I have no idea where the stuff is."
Then she said, "But suppose he comes up to the ground floor!"
Then she said, "But what if he comes up to the ground floor?"
"That's all right. We shall know it the minute he opens a door on that floor. It will set off the alarm."
"That's fine. We'll know it as soon as he opens a door on that floor. It will trigger the alarm."
Just then the terrific buzzing broke out again. I said,
Just then, the loud buzzing started again. I said,
"He has arrived. I told you he would. I know all about burglars and their ways. They are systematic people."
"He’s here. I told you he would be. I know all about burglars and how they operate. They’re methodical people."
I went into the bath-room to see if I was right, and I was. I shut off the dining-room and stopped the buzzing, and came back to bed. My wife said,
I went into the bathroom to check if I was correct, and I was. I turned off the dining room light and silenced the buzzing, then returned to bed. My wife said,
"What do you suppose he is after now?"
"What do you think he's after now?"
I said, "I think he has got all the vegetables he wants and is coming up for napkin-rings and odds and ends for the wife and children. They all have families—burglars have—and they are always thoughtful of them, always take a few necessaries of life for themselves, and fill out with tokens of remembrance for the family. In taking them they do not forget us: those very things represent tokens of his remembrance of us, and also of our remembrance of him. We never get them again; the memory of the attention remains embalmed in our hearts."
I said, "I think he has all the vegetables he needs and is looking for napkin rings and other little things for his wife and kids. They all have families—burglars do—and they always think of them, always grab a few essentials for themselves, and add in mementos for their loved ones. By taking these items, they don’t forget us: those same things represent their thoughts of us, and our thoughts of them. We never see them again; the memory of their thoughtfulness stays with us forever."
"Are you going down to see what it is he wants now?"
"Are you going to check out what he wants now?"
"No," I said, "I am no more interested than I was before. They are experienced people,—burglars; they know what they want; I should be no help to him. I think he is after ceramics and bric-à-brac and such things. If he knows the house he knows that that is all that he can find on the dining-room floor."
"No," I said, "I'm no more interested than I was before. They’re experienced people—burglars; they know what they want; I wouldn't be any help to him. I think he’s looking for ceramics and knick-knacks and stuff like that. If he knows the house, he knows that's all he can find on the dining-room floor."
She said, with a strong interest perceptible in her tone, "Suppose he comes up here!"
She said, with a noticeable excitement in her voice, "What if he comes up here!"
I said, "It is all right. He will give us notice."
I said, "It's okay. He'll let us know."
"What shall we do then then?"
"What should we do now?"
"Climb out of the window."
"Climb out the window."
She said, a little restively, "Well, what is the use of a burglar-alarm for us?"
She said, a bit impatiently, "Well, what's the point of a burglar alarm for us?"
[Pg 715]"You have seen, dear heart, that it has been useful up to the present moment, and I have explained to you how it will be continuously useful after he gets up here."
[Pg 715]"You see, my dear, it's been helpful so far, and I've shown you how it will keep being useful after he arrives."
That was the end of it. He didn't ring any more alarms. Presently I said,
That was the end of it. He didn't sound any more alarms. A little while later, I said,
"He is disappointed, I think. He has gone off with the vegetables and the bric-à-brac, and I think he is dissatisfied."
"He seems disappointed, I think. He left with the vegetables and the odds and ends, and I feel like he's not happy."
We went to sleep, and at a quarter before eight in the morning I was out, and hurrying, for I was to take the 8.29 train for New York. I found the gas burning brightly—full head—all over the first floor. My new overcoat was gone; my old umbrella was gone; my new patent-leather shoes, which I had never worn, were gone. The large window which opened into the ombra at the rear of the house was standing wide. I passed out through it and tracked the burglar down the hill through the trees; tracked him without difficulty, because he had blazed his progress with imitation silver napkin-rings, and my umbrella, and various other things which he had disapproved of; and I went back in triumph and proved to my wife that he was a disappointed burglar. I had suspected he would be, from the start, and from his not coming up to our floor to get human beings.
We went to sleep, and at a quarter to eight in the morning I woke up and rushed, because I had to catch the 8:29 train to New York. I found the gas was burning brightly—full blast—on the first floor. My new overcoat was missing; my old umbrella was gone; my new patent leather shoes, which I had never worn, were gone. The large window that opened into the ombra at the back of the house was wide open. I passed through it and followed the burglar down the hill through the trees; it was easy to track him because he had left a trail of imitation silver napkin rings, my umbrella, and various other things he didn’t want; I returned in triumph and showed my wife that he was a disappointed burglar. I had suspected he would be from the beginning, especially since he hadn’t come up to our floor to grab any people.
Things happened to me that day in New York. I will tell about them another time.
Things happened to me that day in New York. I'll share about them another time.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Papa has a peculiar gait we like, it seems just to sute him, but most people do not; he always walks up and down the room while thinking and between each coarse at meals.
Papa has a distinctive way of walking that we appreciate; it seems to fit him, but most people don't. He constantly paces back and forth in the room while thinking and during each course of a meal.
A lady distantly related to us came to visit us once in those days. She came to stay a week, but all our efforts to make her happy failed, we could not imagine why, and she got up her anchor and sailed the next morning. We did much guessing, but could not solve the mystery. Later we found out what the trouble was. It was my tramping up and down between the courses. She conceived the idea that I could not stand her society.
A lady who was somewhat related to us came to visit once back then. She planned to stay for a week, but despite all our attempts to make her happy, we couldn’t figure out why they didn’t work, and she packed up and left the next morning. We speculated a lot but couldn’t crack the mystery. Later, we discovered what the issue was. It was my wandering back and forth between the meals. She got the impression that I couldn’t tolerate her company.
That word "Youth," as the reader has perhaps already guessed, was my wife's pet name for me. It was gently satirical, but also affectionate. I had certain mental and material peculiarities and customs proper to a much younger person than I was.
That word "Youth," as you might have already figured out, was my wife's nickname for me. It was playfully sarcastic, but also loving. I had some weird habits and tendencies that were more typical of someone much younger than I actually was.
Papa is very fond of animals particularly of cats, we had a dear little gray kitten once that he named "Lazy" (papa always wears gray to match his hair and eyes) and he would carry him around on his shoulder, it was a mighty pretty sight! the gray cat sound asleep against papa's gray coat and hair. The names that he has given our different cats, are realy remarkably funny, they are namely Stray Kit, Abner, Motley, Fraeulein, Lazy, Bufalo Bill, Cleveland, Sour Mash, and Pestilence and Famine.
Dad really loves animals, especially cats. We once had a cute little gray kitten he named "Lazy" (Dad always wears gray to match his hair and eyes), and he would carry him around on his shoulder. It was such a nice sight! The gray cat sound asleep against Dad's gray coat and hair. The names he's given our different cats are actually pretty funny: Stray Kit, Abner, Motley, Fraeulein, Lazy, Buffalo Bill, Cleveland, Sour Mash, and Pestilence and Famine.
At one time when the children were small, we had a very black mother-cat named Satan, and Satan had a small black offspring named Sin. Pronouns were a difficulty for the children. Little Clara came in one day, her black eyes snapping with indignation, and said,
At one point when the kids were little, we had a completely black mother cat named Satan, and she had a small black kitten named Sin. The kids struggled with pronouns. One day, little Clara came in, her dark eyes flashing with anger, and said,
"Papa, Satan ought to be punished. She is out there at the greenhouse and there she stays and stays, and his kitten is down-stairs crying."
"Papa, Satan should be punished. She’s out there in the greenhouse and just keeps staying there, while his kitten is downstairs crying."
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Papa uses very strong language, but I have an idea not nearly so strong as when he first maried mamma. A lady acquaintance of his is rather apt to interupt what one is saying, and papa told mamma that he thought he should say to the lady's husband "I am glad your wife wasn't present when the Deity said 'Let there be light.'"
Papa uses some pretty rough language, but I have a suggestion that's not as extreme as what he said when he first married Mom. A female friend of his often interrupts others when they’re talking, and Dad told Mom he thought he should tell the woman’s husband, "I’m glad your wife wasn’t around when God said, ‘Let there be light.’"
It is as I have said before. This is a frank historian. She doesn't cover up one's deficiencies, but gives them an equal showing with one's handsomer qualities. Of course I made the remark which she has quoted—and even at this distant day I am still as much as half persuaded that if that lady had been present when the Creator said, "Let there be light," she would have interrupted Him and we shouldn't ever have got it.
It's just like I said before. This historian is straightforward. She doesn't hide anyone's flaws; she treats them equally alongside their better traits. Of course, I made the comment she quoted—and even now, I still think that if that lady had been there when the Creator said, "Let there be light," she would have interrupted Him, and we might never have had it.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Papa said the other day, "I am a mugwump and a mugwump is pure from the marrow out." (Papa knows that I am writing this biography of him, and he said this for it.) He doesn't like to go to church at all, why I never understood, until just now, he told us the other day that he couldn't bear to hear any one talk but himself, but that he could listen to himself talk for hours without getting tired, of course he said this in joke, but I've no dought it was founded on truth.
Dad said the other day, "I'm a mugwump, and a mugwump is pure to the core." (Dad knows I’m writing this biography about him, and he said it for that reason.) He really doesn't like going to church at all, which I never understood until just now. He mentioned recently that he can't stand to hear anyone talk except himself, but he could listen to himself talk for hours without getting tired. Of course, he said this jokingly, but I’m sure there’s some truth to it.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCII.
NOVEMBER 2, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—V.
BY MARK TWAIN.
Susy's remark about my strong language troubles me, and I must go back to it. All through the first ten years of my married life I kept a constant and discreet watch upon my tongue while in the house, and went outside and to a distance when circumstances were too much for me and I was obliged to seek relief. I prized my wife's respect and approval above all the rest of the human race's respect and approval. I dreaded the day when she should discover that I was but a whited sepulchre partly freighted with suppressed language. I was so careful, during ten years, that I had not a doubt that my suppressions had been suc[Pg 834]cessful. Therefore I was quite as happy in my guilt as I could have been if I had been innocent.
Susy's comment about my strong language bothers me, and I need to revisit it. Throughout the first ten years of my marriage, I kept a careful and quiet watch on my words at home, stepping outside when things got overwhelming and I needed a break. I valued my wife's respect and approval more than anyone else's. I feared the day she would realize that I was just a façade hiding my suppressed feelings. I was so careful for ten years that I had no doubt my efforts had succeeded. As a result, I was just as happy in my guilt as I could have been if I were innocent.
But at last an accident exposed me. I went into the bath-room one morning to make my toilet, and carelessly left the door two or three inches ajar. It was the first time that I had ever failed to take the precaution of closing it tightly. I knew the necessity of being particular about this, because shaving was always a trying ordeal for me, and I could seldom carry it through to a finish without verbal helps. Now this time I was unprotected, but did not suspect it. I had no extraordinary trouble with my razor on this occasion, and was able to worry through with mere mutterings and growlings of an improper sort, but with nothing noisy or emphatic about them—no snapping and barking. Then I put on a shirt. My shirts are an invention of my own. They open in the back, and are buttoned there—when there are buttons. This time the button was missing. My temper jumped up several degrees in a moment, and my remarks rose accordingly, both in loudness and vigor of expression. But I was not troubled, for the bath-room door was a solid one and I supposed it was firmly closed. I flung up the window and threw the shirt out. It fell upon the shrubbery where the people on their way to church could admire it if they wanted to; there was merely fifty feet of grass between the shirt and the passer-by. Still rumbling and thundering distantly, I put on another shirt. Again the button was absent. I augmented my language to meet the emergency, and threw that shirt out of the window. I was too angry—too insane—to examine the third shirt, but put it furiously on. Again the button was absent, and that shirt followed its comrades out of the window. Then I straightened up, gathered my reserves, and let myself go like a cavalry charge. In the midst of that great assault, my eye fell upon that gaping door, and I was paralyzed.
But finally, an accident revealed my situation. One morning, I walked into the bathroom to get ready and carelessly left the door a couple of inches open. It was the first time I hadn’t taken the precaution to close it properly. I understood how crucial it was to be careful about this because shaving had always been a difficult task for me, and I often struggled to finish without some verbal support. This time, I was completely unprotected, but I didn’t realize it. I didn’t have huge issues with my razor this time, and I managed to get by with just some mutterings and grumbling, nothing too loud or dramatic—no snapping or barking. Then I put on a shirt. My shirts are a design I created myself. They open at the back and are buttoned there—when they actually have buttons. This time, the button was missing. My frustration shot up instantly, and my comments became louder and more intense. But I wasn’t worried because the bathroom door was solid, and I assumed it was closed tight. I threw open the window and tossed the shirt out. It landed in the bushes, where anyone on their way to church could see it if they wanted to; there was just fifty feet of grass between the shirt and the people passing by. Still grumbling, I put on another shirt. Again, the button was missing. I cranked up my language to match the situation and threw that shirt out the window, too. I was too furious—too out of control—to check the third shirt, so I just put it on angrily. Once more, the button was missing, and that shirt joined its buddies outside the window. Then I took a deep breath, gathered myself, and let loose like a cavalry charge. In the middle of that spirited attack, my gaze landed on that gaping door, and I froze.
It took me a good while to finish my toilet. I extended the time unnecessarily in trying to make up my mind as to what I would best do in the circumstances. I tried to hope that Mrs. Clemens was asleep, but I knew better. I could not escape by the window. It was narrow, and suited only to shirts. At last I made up my mind to boldly loaf through the bedroom with the air of a person who had not been doing anything. I made half the journey successfully. I did not turn my eyes in her[Pg 835] direction, because that would not be safe. It is very difficult to look as if you have not been doing anything when the facts are the other way, and my confidence in my performance oozed steadily out of me as I went along. I was aiming for the left-hand door because it was furthest from my wife. It had never been opened from the day that the house was built, but it seemed a blessed refuge for me now. The bed was this one, wherein I am lying now, and dictating these histories morning after morning with so much serenity. It was this same old elaborately carved black Venetian bedstead—the most comfortable bedstead that ever was, with space enough in it for a family, and carved angels enough surmounting its twisted columns and its headboard and footboard to bring peace to the sleepers, and pleasant dreams. I had to stop in the middle of the room. I hadn't the strength to go on. I believed that I was under accusing eyes—that even the carved angels were inspecting me with an unfriendly gaze. You know how it is when you are convinced that somebody behind you is looking steadily at you. You have to turn your face—you can't help it. I turned mine. The bed was placed as it is now, with the foot where the head ought to be. If it had been placed as it should have been, the high headboard would have sheltered me. But the footboard was no sufficient protection, for I could be seen over it. I was exposed. I was wholly without protection. I turned, because I couldn't help it—and my memory of what I saw is still vivid, after all these years.
It took me a while to finish my bathroom break. I wasted time trying to decide what I should do in this situation. I wanted to believe that Mrs. Clemens was asleep, but I knew better. I couldn't escape through the window; it was too narrow and only suitable for shirts. Finally, I decided to casually walk through the bedroom like someone who hadn't been up to anything. I made it halfway without incident. I didn’t dare look in her[Pg 835] direction because that would be risky. It's really hard to act like you haven't been doing anything when the truth is the opposite, and my confidence in my act drained away as I moved. I was headed for the left-hand door because it was the farthest from my wife. It had never been opened since the house was built, but it felt like a safe haven for me now. The bed was this one, where I’m lying now, dictating these stories every morning with so much calm. It was the same old intricately carved black Venetian bed—the most comfortable bed ever, offering enough space for a family, and with so many carved angels atop its twisted columns, headboard, and footboard that they seemed to bring peace to the sleepers and pleasant dreams. I had to stop in the middle of the room. I didn’t have the strength to keep going. I felt like I was under scrutiny—that even the carved angels were looking at me with disapproval. You know that feeling when you’re sure someone behind you is staring at you? You have to turn around—you can’t help it. I turned mine. The bed was positioned as it is now, with the foot where the head should be. If it had been placed correctly, the tall headboard would have sheltered me. But the footboard didn’t provide enough cover because I could be seen over it. I was exposed. I had no protection at all. I turned because I couldn’t stop myself—and my memory of what I saw is still clear after all these years.
Against the white pillows I saw the black head—I saw that young and beautiful face; and I saw the gracious eyes with a something in them which I had never seen there before. They were snapping and flashing with indignation. I felt myself crumbling; I felt myself shrinking away to nothing under that accusing gaze. I stood silent under that desolating fire for as much as a minute, I should say—it seemed a very, very long time. Then my wife's lips parted, and from them issued—my latest bath-room remark. The language perfect, but the expression velvety, unpractical, apprenticelike, ignorant, inexperienced, comically inadequate, absurdly weak and unsuited to the great language. In my lifetime I had never heard anything so out of tune, so inharmonious, so incongruous, so ill-suited to each other as were those mighty words set to that feeble music. I tried to keep from laughing, for I was a guilty person in deep[Pg 836] need of charity and mercy. I tried to keep from bursting, and I succeeded—until she gravely said, "There, now you know how it sounds."
Against the white pillows, I saw the dark head—I saw that young and beautiful face; and I noticed the graceful eyes, which had something in them that I had never seen before. They were flashing with indignation. I felt myself crumbling; I felt myself shrinking away to nothing under that accusing gaze. I stood silent under that devastating fire for what felt like a minute—it seemed like a very, very long time. Then my wife's lips parted, and from them came—my latest bathroom remark. The language was perfect, but the expression was soft, impractical, amateurish, ignorant, inexperienced, comically inadequate, absurdly weak, and totally unsuited for such grand words. In my life, I had never heard anything so out of sync, so disharmonious, so incongruous, so mismatched as those powerful words paired with that weak delivery. I tried not to laugh because I was a guilty person in deep[Pg 836] need of charity and mercy. I tried to hold it together, and I managed—until she solemnly said, "There, now you know how it sounds."
Then I exploded; the air was filled with my fragments, and you could hear them whiz. I said, "Oh Livy, if it sounds like that I will never do it again!"
Then I blew up; the air was filled with my pieces, and you could hear them whizzing by. I said, "Oh Livy, if it sounds like that I will never do it again!"
Then she had to laugh herself. Both of us broke into convulsions, and went on laughing until we were physically exhausted and spiritually reconciled.
Then she had to laugh too. Both of us erupted into laughs and kept going until we were physically worn out and felt at peace with each other.
The children were present at breakfast—Clara aged six and Susy eight—and the mother made a guarded remark about strong language; guarded because she did not wish the children to suspect anything—a guarded remark which censured strong language. Both children broke out in one voice with this comment, "Why, mamma, papa uses it!"
The kids were at breakfast—Clara, who was six, and Susy, who was eight—and their mom made a cautious comment about swear words; cautious because she didn’t want the kids to think anything was wrong—a cautious remark that criticized cursing. Both kids responded simultaneously, saying, "But, mom, dad uses it!"
I was astonished. I had supposed that that secret was safe in my own breast, and that its presence had never been suspected. I asked,
I was shocked. I thought that secret was safe with me, and that no one had ever suspected it was there. I asked,
"How did you know, you little rascals?"
"How did you guys know, you little rascals?"
"Oh," they said, "we often listen over the balusters when you are in the hall explaining things to George."
"Oh," they said, "we often listen from the balcony when you're in the hall explaining things to George."
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
One of papa's latest books is "The Prince and the Pauper" and it is unquestionably the best book he has ever written, some people want him to keep to his old style, some gentleman wrote him, "I enjoyed Huckleberry Finn immensely and am glad to see that you have returned to your old style." That enoyed me that enoyed me greatly, because it trobles me [Susy was troubled by that word, and uncertain; she wrote a u above it in the proper place, but reconsidered the matter and struck it out] to have so few people know papa, I mean realy know him, they think of Mark Twain as a humorist joking at everything; "And with a mop of reddish brown hair which sorely needs the barbars brush a roman nose, short stubby mustache, a sad care-worn face, with maney crow's feet" etc. That is the way people picture papa, I have wanted papa to write a book that would reveal something of his kind sympathetic nature, and "The Prince and the Pauper" partly does it. The book is full of lovely charming ideas, and oh the language! It is perfect. I think that one of the most touching scenes in it, is where the pauper is riding on horseback with his nobles in the "recognition procession" and he sees his mother oh and then what followed! How she runs to his side, when she sees him throw up his hand palm outward, and is rudely pushed off by one of the King's officers, and then how the little pauper's consceince[Pg 837] troubles him when he remembers the shameful words that were falling from his lips, when she was turned from his side "I know you not woman" and how his grandeurs were stricken valueless, and his pride consumed to ashes. It is a wonderfully beautiful and touching little scene, and papa has described it so wonderfully. I never saw a man with so much variety of feeling as papa has; now the "Prince and the Pauper" is full of touching places; but there is most always a streak of humor in them somewhere. Now in the coronation—in the stirring coronation, just after the little king has got his crown back again papa brings that in about the Seal, where the pauper says he used the Seal "to crack nuts with." Oh it is so funny and nice! Papa very seldom writes a passage without some humor in it somewhere, and I dont think he ever will.
One of Dad's recent books is "The Prince and the Pauper," and it’s definitely the best book he has ever written. Some people want him to stick to his old style; one guy even wrote to him, “I really enjoyed Huckleberry Finn and I’m glad to see you’ve gone back to your old style.” That really annoyed me because it frustrates me [Susy was bothered by that word, and uncertain; she wrote a u above it in the proper place but then reconsidered and crossed it out] that so few people actually understand Dad. They see Mark Twain as just a humorist making jokes about everything. "And with a mop of reddish-brown hair that really needs a barber’s touch, a Roman nose, a short stubby mustache, and a sad, tired face with many crow's feet," etc. That’s how people picture Dad. I’ve wanted Dad to write a book that shows his kind, sympathetic nature, and "The Prince and the Pauper" does that to some extent. The book is full of lovely, charming ideas, and oh, the language! It’s perfect. One of the most touching scenes is when the pauper is riding on horseback with his nobles in the "recognition procession," and he sees his mother—oh, and then what happens! She rushes to him when she sees him raise his hand palm outward but is rudely pushed away by one of the King's officers, and then how the little pauper's conscience[Pg 837] troubles him when he remembers the shameful words he said as she was turned away from him, “I know you not, woman,” and how his greatness felt worthless and his pride turned to ashes. It’s a beautifully touching little scene, and Dad has described it so wonderfully. I've never seen anyone with as much variety of feeling as Dad has; now "The Prince and the Pauper" is full of emotional moments, but there’s usually a hint of humor somewhere in them. Now in the coronation—in the stirring coronation, just after the little king has gotten his crown back, Dad includes that line about the Seal, where the pauper says he used the Seal “to crack nuts with.” Oh, it’s so funny and nice! Dad very rarely writes a passage without some humor in it somewhere, and I don’t think he ever will.
The children always helped their mother to edit my books in manuscript. She would sit on the porch at the farm and read aloud, with her pencil in her hand, and the children would keep an alert and suspicious eye upon her right along, for the belief was well grounded in them that whenever she came across a particularly satisfactory passage she would strike it out. Their suspicions were well founded. The passages which were so satisfactory to them always had an element of strength in them which sorely needed modification or expurgation, and were always sure to get it at their mother's hand. For my own entertainment, and to enjoy the protests of the children, I often abused my editor's innocent confidence. I often interlarded remarks of a studied and felicitously atrocious character purposely to achieve the children's brief delight, and then see the remorseless pencil do its fatal work. I often joined my supplications to the children's for mercy, and strung the argument out and pretended to be in earnest. They were deceived, and so was their mother. It was three against one, and most unfair. But it was very delightful, and I could not resist the temptation. Now and then we gained the victory and there was much rejoicing. Then I privately struck the passage out myself. It had served its purpose. It had furnished three of us with good entertainment, and in being removed from the book by me it was only suffering the fate originally intended for it.
The kids always helped their mom edit my manuscript books. She would sit on the porch at the farm and read aloud, pencil in hand, while the kids kept a watchful and suspicious eye on her. They firmly believed that whenever she found a particularly satisfying passage, she would strike it out. Their suspicions were spot on. The passages they loved usually had a certain strength that definitely needed editing or cutting, and their mom was always the one to do it. For my own amusement and to enjoy the kids’ protests, I often took advantage of my editor's trusting nature. I would deliberately include remarks that were particularly horrible just to delight the kids for a moment, then watch as the relentless pencil did its destructive work. I often joined the kids in pleading for mercy, dragging out my pleas and pretending to be serious. They fell for it, and so did their mom. It was three against one, and totally unfair. But it was a lot of fun, and I couldn't resist the temptation. Occasionally, we would win the battle, and there would be much celebration. Then, I would privately strike the passage out myself. It had done its job. It had given the three of us some good laughs, and by me removing it from the book, it was only meeting the fate that was originally meant for it.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Papa was born in Missouri. His mother is Grandma Clemens (Jane Lampton Clemens) of Kentucky. Grandpa Clemens was of the F.F.V's of Virginia.
Papa was born in Missouri. His mother is Grandma Clemens (Jane Lampton Clemens) from Kentucky. Grandpa Clemens was one of the F.F.V's from Virginia.
Without doubt it was I that gave Susy that impression. I cannot imagine why, because I was never in my life much impressed by grandeurs which proceed from the accident of birth. I did not get this indifference from my mother. She was always strongly interested in the ancestry of the house. She traced her own line back to the Lambtons of Durham, England—a family which had been occupying broad lands there since Saxon times. I am not sure, but I think that those Lambtons got along without titles of nobility for eight or nine hundred years, then produced a great man, three-quarters of a century ago, and broke into the peerage. My mother knew all about the Clemenses of Virginia, and loved to aggrandize them to me, but she has long been dead. There has been no one to keep those details fresh in my memory, and they have grown dim.
There's no doubt that I gave Susy that impression. I can't imagine why, because I've never been particularly impressed by status that comes from birth. I didn't get this indifference from my mother. She was always very interested in our family history. She traced her lineage back to the Lambtons of Durham, England—a family that has owned extensive land there since Saxon times. I’m not entirely sure, but I think those Lambtons managed without noble titles for eight or nine hundred years, then produced a prominent figure about seventy-five years ago and entered the peerage. My mother knew all about the Clemenses of Virginia and loved to make them seem more impressive to me, but she has been gone for a long time. There hasn’t been anyone to keep those details fresh in my mind, and they've faded.
There was a Jere. Clemens who was a United States Senator, and in his day enjoyed the usual Senatorial fame—a fame which perishes whether it spring from four years' service or forty. After Jere. Clemens's fame as a Senator passed away, he was still remembered for many years on account of another service which he performed. He shot old John Brown's Governor Wise in the hind leg in a duel. However, I am not very clear about this. It may be that Governor Wise shot him in the hind leg. However, I don't think it is important. I think that the only thing that is really important is that one of them got shot in the hind leg. It would have been better and nobler and more historical and satisfactory if both of them had got shot in the hind leg—but it is of no use for me to try to recollect history. I never had a historical mind. Let it go. Whichever way it happened I am glad of it, and that is as much enthusiasm as I can get up for a person bearing my name. But I am forgetting the first Clemens—the one that stands furthest back toward the really original first Clemens, which was Adam.
There was a Jere. Clemens who was a United States Senator, and in his time, he enjoyed the typical Senatorial fame—a fame that fades away whether it comes from four years of service or forty. After Jere. Clemens's fame as a Senator faded, he was still remembered for many years because of another thing he did. He shot old John Brown's Governor Wise in the leg during a duel. However, I’m not entirely sure about this. It could be that Governor Wise shot him in the leg. But honestly, I don't think it really matters. The key point is that one of them got shot in the leg. It would have been better and more admirable and historically satisfying if they both had been shot in the leg—but it’s pointless for me to try to remember history. I’ve never had a knack for history. Let it be. Whichever way it happened, I'm glad about it, and that’s about as much enthusiasm as I can muster for someone sharing my name. But I'm forgetting the first Clemens—the one that goes back to the truly original first Clemens, who was Adam.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's bio.
Clara and I are sure that papa played the trick on Grandma, about the whipping, that is related in "The Adventures of Tom Sayer": "Hand me that switch." The switch hovered in the air, the peril was desperate—"My, look behind you Aunt!" The old lady whirled around and snatched her skirts out of danger. The lad fled on the instant, scrambling up the high board fence and dissapeared over it.
Clara and I are pretty sure Dad played a prank on Grandma about the whipping, just like in "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer": "Hand me that switch." The switch was up in the air, and it felt dangerous—"Oh, look behind you, Aunt!" The old lady turned around and pulled her skirts out of the way. The kid took off right away, climbing the tall wooden fence and vanishing over it.
Susy and Clara were quite right about that.
Susy and Clara were absolutely right about that.
[Pg 839]Then Susy says:
Then Susy says:
And we know papa played "Hookey" all the time. And how readily would papa pretend to be dying so as not to have to go to school!
And we know Dad skipped school all the time. And how easily Dad would fake being sick just to avoid going to school!
These revelations and exposures are searching, but they are just If I am as transparent to other people as I was to Susy, I have wasted much effort in this life.
These revelations and exposures are intense, but they mean nothing if I’m not as open with others as I was with Susy; that would mean I’ve wasted a lot of effort in my life.
Grandma couldn't make papa go to school, no she let him go into a printing-office to learn the trade. He did so, and gradually picked up enough education to enable him to do about as well as those who were more studious in early life.
Grandma couldn't force Dad to go to school; instead, she allowed him to work at a printing shop to learn the trade. He did that and gradually gained enough education to do just as well as those who focused on studying more when they were younger.
It is noticeable that Susy does not get overheated when she is complimenting me, but maintains a proper judicial and biographical calm. It is noticeable, also, and it is to her credit as a biographer, that she distributes compliment and criticism with a fair and even hand.
It’s clear that Susy doesn’t get flustered when she compliments me; she keeps a composed and objective demeanor. It’s also worth noting, and it speaks well of her as a biographer, that she gives both compliments and criticism in a balanced and fair way.
My mother had a good deal of trouble with me, but I think she enjoyed it. She had none at all with my brother Henry, who was two years younger than I, and I think that the unbroken monotony of his goodness and truthfulness and obedience would have been a burden to her but for the relief and variety which I furnished in the other direction. I was a tonic. I was valuable to her. I never thought of it before, but now I see it. I never knew Henry to do a vicious thing toward me, or toward any one else—but he frequently did righteous ones that cost me as heavily. It was his duty to report me, when I needed reporting and neglected to do it myself, and he was very faithful in discharging that duty. He is "Sid" in "Tom Sawyer." But Sid was not Henry. Henry was a very much finer and better boy than ever Sid was.
My mom had a lot of trouble with me, but I think she secretly enjoyed it. She didn’t have any issues with my younger brother Henry, who is two years my junior, and I believe that the constant predictability of his goodness, honesty, and obedience would have been a burden for her if it weren't for the relief and variety I brought in the opposite direction. I was a bit of a booster. I was important to her. I never thought about it before, but I see it now. I never saw Henry do anything mean to me or anyone else, but he often did the right thing that got me in trouble. It was his job to report me when I needed to be reported but forgot to do it myself, and he was really dedicated to fulfilling that duty. He’s "Sid" in "Tom Sawyer." But Sid wasn’t Henry. Henry was a much better and finer boy than Sid ever was.
It was Henry who called my mother's attention to the fact that the thread with which she had sewed my collar together to keep me from going in swimming, had changed color. My mother would not have discovered it but for that, and she was manifestly piqued when she recognized that that prominent bit of circumstantial evidence had escaped her sharp eye. That detail probably added a detail to my punishment. It is human. We generally visit our shortcomings on somebody else when there is a possible excuse for it—but no matter, I took it out of Henry. There is always compensation for such as are unjustly used. I[Pg 840] often took it out of him—sometimes as an advance payment for something which I hadn't yet done. These were occasions when the opportunity was too strong a temptation, and I had to draw on the future. I did not need to copy this idea from my mother, and probably didn't. Still she wrought upon that principle upon occasion.
It was Henry who pointed out to my mom that the thread she used to sew my collar shut to stop me from going swimming had changed color. My mom wouldn’t have noticed it without his help, and she was clearly annoyed when she realized she had missed that important detail. That probably added to my punishment. It's human nature; we often take out our frustrations on others when we have a reason to do so—but regardless, I took it out on Henry. There’s always a way to get back at those who treat us unfairly. I frequently did it to him—sometimes even as an advance for something I hadn't done yet. Those were times when the temptation was too strong, and I had to bank on the future. I didn’t need to learn this from my mom, and I probably didn’t. Still, she did use that idea from time to time.
If the incident of the broken sugar-bowl is in "Tom Sawyer"—I don't remember whether it is or not—that is an example of it. Henry never stole sugar. He took it openly from the bowl. His mother knew he wouldn't take sugar when she wasn't looking, but she had her doubts about me. Not exactly doubts, either. She knew very well I would. One day when she was not present, Henry took sugar from her prized and precious old English sugar-bowl, which was an heirloom in the family—and he managed to break the bowl. It was the first time I had ever had a chance to tell anything on him, and I was inexpressibly glad. I told him I was going to tell on him, but he was not disturbed. When my mother came in and saw the bowl lying on the floor in fragments, she was speechless for a minute. I allowed that silence to work; I judged it would increase the effect. I was waiting for her to ask "Who did that?"—so that I could fetch out my news. But it was an error of calculation. When she got through with her silence she didn't ask anything about it—she merely gave me a crack on the skull with her thimble that I felt all the way down to my heels. Then I broke out with my injured innocence, expecting to make her very sorry that she had punished the wrong one. I expected her to do something remorseful and pathetic. I told her that I was not the one—it was Henry. But there was no upheaval. She said, without emotion, "It's all right. It isn't any matter. You deserve it for something you've done that I didn't know about; and if you haven't done it, why then you deserve it for something that you are going to do, that I sha'n't hear about."
If the story about the broken sugar bowl is in "Tom Sawyer"—I can't remember if it is or not—that’s a perfect example. Henry never stole sugar. He took it openly from the bowl. His mom knew he wouldn’t take sugar when she wasn’t watching, but she had her doubts about me. Not exactly doubts, either. She knew I would. One day when she wasn’t around, Henry took sugar from her treasured old English sugar bowl, which was a family heirloom—and he ended up breaking it. It was the first time I had the chance to tell on him, and I was incredibly happy about it. I told him I was going to tell on him, but he wasn’t worried. When my mom came in and saw the bowl shattered on the floor, she was speechless for a moment. I let that silence linger; I figured it would make a bigger impact. I was waiting for her to ask, "Who did this?"—so I could spill the news. But I miscalculated. After her silence, she didn’t ask anything—she just gave me a whack on the head with her thimble that I felt all the way down to my heels. Then I acted all innocent, hoping to make her regret punishing the wrong person. I thought she would feel bad and sympathetic. I told her it wasn’t me—it was Henry. But there was no reaction. She said, without any emotion, "It’s fine. It doesn’t matter. You deserve it for something you’ve done that I didn’t know about; and if you haven’t done it, then you deserve it for something you’re going to do that I won’t hear about."
There was a stairway outside the house, which led up to the rear part of the second story. One day Henry was sent on an errand, and he took a tin bucket along. I knew he would have to ascend those stairs, so I went up and locked the door on the inside, and came down into the garden, which had been newly ploughed and was rich in choice firm clods of black mold. I gathered a generous equipment of these, and ambushed him. I[Pg 841] waited till he had climbed the stairs and was near the landing and couldn't escape. Then I bombarded him with clods, which he warded off with his tin bucket the best he could, but without much success, for I was a good marksman. The clods smashing against the weather-boarding fetched my mother out to see what was the matter, and I tried to explain that I was amusing Henry. Both of them were after me in a minute, but I knew the way over that high board fence and escaped for that time. After an hour or two, when I ventured back, there was no one around and I thought the incident was closed. But it was not. Henry was ambushing me. With an unusually competent aim for him, he landed a stone on the side of my head which raised a bump there that felt like the Matterhorn. I carried it to my mother straightway for sympathy, but she was not strongly moved. It seemed to be her idea that incidents like this would eventually reform me if I harvested enough of them. So the matter was only educational. I had had a sterner view of it than that, before.
There was a staircase outside the house that led up to the back part of the second story. One day, Henry was sent on an errand, and he took a tin bucket with him. I knew he would have to go up those stairs, so I went up, locked the door from the inside, and then came down into the garden, which had just been plowed and was filled with fresh, firm clumps of black dirt. I collected a good haul of these and set up an ambush for him. I waited until he had climbed the stairs and was near the landing, where he couldn't escape. Then I pelted him with clods, which he tried to block with his tin bucket, but he wasn't very successful since I was a pretty good shot. The clods smashing against the siding brought my mother out to see what was going on, and I tried to explain that I was just having fun with Henry. Both of them came after me in no time, but I knew how to get over that tall wooden fence, so I managed to escape, at least for then. After an hour or two, when I came back, nobody was around, and I thought the whole thing was done. But it wasn't. Henry was waiting for me. With surprising accuracy for him, he hit me on the side of the head with a stone that left a bump there that felt huge. I went straight to my mother for sympathy, but she didn't seem too concerned. She thought that experiences like this would eventually help reform me if I faced enough of them. So, to her, it was just a learning experience. I had a much harsher perspective on it before.
It was not right to give the cat the "Pain-Killer"; I realize it now. I would not repeat it in these days. But in those "Tom Sawyer" days it was a great and sincere satisfaction to me to see Peter perform under its influence—and if actions do speak as loud as words, he took as much interest in it as I did. It was a most detestable medicine, Perry Davis's Pain-Killer. Mr. Pavey's negro man, who was a person of good judgment and considerable curiosity, wanted to sample it, and I let him. It was his opinion that it was made of hell-fire.
It wasn’t right to give the cat the “Pain-Killer”; I realize that now. I wouldn’t do it today. But back in those “Tom Sawyer” days, it brought me a great and genuine satisfaction to watch Peter act under its influence—and if actions do speak as loud as words, he showed just as much interest in it as I did. It was a terrible medicine, Perry Davis's Pain-Killer. Mr. Pavey’s Black servant, who had good judgment and was quite curious, wanted to try it, and I let him. He thought it was made of hell-fire.
Those were the cholera days of '49. The people along the Mississippi were paralyzed with fright. Those who could run away, did it. And many died of fright in the flight. Fright killed three persons where the cholera killed one. Those who couldn't flee kept themselves drenched with cholera preventives, and my mother chose Perry Davis's Pain-Killer for me. She was not distressed about herself. She avoided that kind of preventive. But she made me promise to take a teaspoonful of Pain-Killer every day. Originally it was my intention to keep the promise, but at that time I didn't know as much about Pain-Killer as I knew after my first experiment with it. She didn't watch Henry's bottle—she could trust Henry. But she marked my bottle with a pencil, on the label, every day, and examined it[Pg 842] to see if the teaspoonful had been removed. The floor was not carpeted. It had cracks in it, and I fed the Pain-Killer to the cracks with very good results—no cholera occurred down below.
Those were the cholera days of '49. The people along the Mississippi were terrified. Those who could escape did, and many died from fear while fleeing. Fear killed three people where cholera killed one. Those who couldn't run away kept themselves saturated with cholera preventatives, and my mother chose Perry Davis's Pain-Killer for me. She wasn't worried about herself. She avoided that kind of preventative. But she made me promise to take a teaspoonful of Pain-Killer every day. At first, I planned to keep that promise, but back then, I didn’t know as much about Pain-Killer as I learned after my first experience with it. She didn’t keep an eye on Henry's bottle—she trusted him. But she marked my bottle with a pencil on the label every day and checked it[Pg 842] to see if the teaspoonful had been taken. The floor wasn’t carpeted; it had cracks in it, and I poured the Pain-Killer into the cracks with great results—no cholera appeared down below.
It was upon one of these occasions that that friendly cat came waving his tail and supplicating for Pain-Killer—which he got—and then went into those hysterics which ended with his colliding with all the furniture in the room and finally going out of the open window and carrying the flower-pots with him, just in time for my mother to arrive and look over her glasses in petrified astonishment and say, "What in the world is the matter with Peter?"
It was during one of these times that the friendly cat came over, waving his tail and begging for Pain-Killer—which he got—and then started acting all crazy, colliding with all the furniture in the room and finally jumping out the open window, taking the flower pots with him, just as my mom arrived and looked over her glasses in shocked disbelief and said, "What on earth is wrong with Peter?"
I don't remember what my explanation was, but if it is recorded in that book it may not be the right one.
I don't remember what I said, but if it's written in that book, it might not be accurate.
Whenever my conduct was of such exaggerated impropriety that my mother's extemporary punishments were inadequate, she saved the matter up for Sunday, and made me go to church Sunday night—which was a penalty sometimes bearable, perhaps, but as a rule it was not, and I avoided it for the sake of my constitution. She would never believe that I had been to church until she had applied her test: she made me tell her what the text was. That was a simple matter, and caused me no trouble. I didn't have to go to church to get a text. I selected one for myself. This worked very well until one time when my text and the one furnished by a neighbor, who had been to church, didn't tally. After that my mother took other methods. I don't know what they were now.
Whenever my behavior was so inappropriate that my mom's usual punishments didn’t work, she saved the issue for Sunday and made me go to church on Sunday night—which was sometimes bearable, but usually it wasn’t, and I avoided it for my own sake. She would never believe I actually went to church until she put me to the test: I had to tell her what the sermon was about. That was easy and didn’t bother me at all. I didn’t need to attend church to come up with a sermon topic. I picked one for myself. This worked out fine until one time when my chosen topic and the one from a neighbor, who actually went to church, didn’t match. After that, my mom tried different methods. I can’t recall what they were now.
In those days men and boys wore rather long cloaks in the winter-time. They were black, and were lined with very bright and showy Scotch plaids. One winter's night when I was starting to church to square a crime of some kind committed during the week, I hid my cloak near the gate and went off and played with the other boys until church was over. Then I returned home. But in the dark I put the cloak on wrong side out, entered the room, threw the cloak aside, and then stood the usual examination. I got along very well until the temperature of the church was mentioned. My mother said,
In those days, men and boys wore long cloaks in the winter. They were black and lined with really bright and flashy Scottish plaids. One winter night, when I was heading to church to make up for some trouble I’d gotten into during the week, I hid my cloak by the gate and went off to hang out with the other boys until church was over. Afterward, I went home. But in the dark, I put my cloak on inside out, walked into the room, tossed the cloak aside, and then faced the usual questions. I managed pretty well until they brought up the temperature of the church. My mother said,
"It must have been impossible to keep warm there on such a night."
"It must have been impossible to stay warm there on a night like that."
I didn't see the art of that remark, and was foolish enough to explain that I wore my cloak all the time that I was in church.[Pg 843] She asked if I kept it on from church home, too. I didn't see the bearing of that remark. I said that that was what I had done. She said,
I didn’t get the point of that comment, and I was dumb enough to say that I wore my cloak the whole time I was in church.[Pg 843] She asked if I wore it home from church as well. I didn’t understand the relevance of that remark. I told her that’s what I had done. She replied,
"You wore it in church with that red Scotch plaid outside and glaring? Didn't that attract any attention?"
"You wore it to church with that bright red plaid outside? Didn't that draw any attention?"
Of course to continue such a dialogue would have been tedious and unprofitable, and I let it go, and took the consequences.
Of course, continuing that conversation would have been boring and pointless, so I let it go and accepted the consequences.
That was about 1849. Tom Nash was a boy of my own age—the postmaster's son. The Mississippi was frozen across, and he and I went skating one night, probably without permission. I cannot see why we should go skating in the night unless without permission, for there could be no considerable amusement to be gotten out of skating at night if nobody was going to object to it. About midnight, when we were more than half a mile out toward the Illinois shore, we heard some ominous rumbling and grinding and crashing going on between us and the home side of the river, and we knew what it meant—the ice was breaking up. We started for home, pretty badly scared. We flew along at full speed whenever the moonlight sifting down between the clouds enabled us to tell which was ice and which was water. In the pauses we waited; started again whenever there was a good bridge of ice; paused again when we came to naked water and waited in distress until a floating vast cake should bridge that place. It took us an hour to make the trip—a trip which we made in a misery of apprehension all the time. But at last we arrived within a very brief distance of the shore. We waited again; there was another place that needed bridging. All about us the ice was plunging and grinding along and piling itself up in mountains on the shore, and the dangers were increasing, not diminishing. We grew very impatient to get to solid ground, so we started too early and went springing from cake to cake. Tom made a miscalculation, and fell short. He got a bitter bath, but he was so close to shore that he only had to swim a stroke or two—then his feet struck hard bottom and he crawled out. I arrived a little later, without accident. We had been in a drenching perspiration, and Tom's bath was a disaster for him. He took to his bed sick, and had a procession of diseases. The closing one was scarlet-fever, and he came out of it stone deaf. Within a year or two speech departed, of course. But some years later he was taught to talk, after a fashion—one couldn't always make out[Pg 844] what it was he was trying to say. Of course he could not modulate his voice, since he couldn't hear himself talk. When he supposed he was talking low and confidentially, you could hear him in Illinois.
That was around 1849. Tom Nash was a boy my age—the postmaster's son. The Mississippi was frozen over, and he and I went skating one night, probably without permission. I can't see why we'd go skating at night unless we were sneaking out, because there wouldn't be much fun in it if no one was going to object. Around midnight, when we were more than half a mile from the home side of the river, we heard some ominous rumbling and grinding sounds coming from between us and the shore, and we knew what it meant—the ice was breaking up. We took off for home, pretty scared. We ran as fast as we could whenever moonlight broke through the clouds so we could see where the ice was and where the water was. In the dark moments, we waited; we started again whenever we found a solid bridge of ice; paused again when we reached open water, anxiously waiting for a floating piece to connect the gap. It took us an hour to make the trip—a trip filled with dread the entire time. But finally, we got very close to the shore. We paused again; there was another gap to bridge. All around us, the ice was shifting and crashing, piling up like mountains on the shore, and the dangers were increasing, not lessening. We became very impatient to reach solid ground, so we jumped too soon and leaped from cake to cake. Tom misjudged a jump and fell short. He took a nasty plunge, but he was so close to shore that he only had to swim a stroke or two—then his feet hit solid ground, and he crawled out. I arrived a little later, without any mishaps. We were covered in sweat, and Tom's fall was a disaster for him. He ended up in bed sick, battling a series of illnesses. The last one was scarlet fever, and he came out of it completely deaf. Within a year or two, he lost his ability to speak altogether. But some years later, they taught him to talk, in a way—you couldn't always understand what he was trying to say. Of course, he couldn't control the volume of his voice since he couldn't hear himself speak. When he thought he was talking quietly and confidentially, you could hear him all the way in Illinois.
Four years ago (1902) I was invited by the University of Missouri to come out there and receive the honorary degree of LL.D. I took that opportunity to spend a week in Hannibal—a city now, a village in my day. It had been fifty-three years since Tom Nash and I had had that adventure. When I was at the railway station ready to leave Hannibal, there was a crowd of citizens there. I saw Tom Nash approaching me across a vacant space, and I walked toward him, for I recognized him at once. He was old and white-headed, but the boy of fifteen was still visible in him. He came up to me, made a trumpet of his hands at my ear, nodded his head toward the citizens and said confidentially—in a yell like a fog-horn—
Four years ago (1902), I was invited by the University of Missouri to come out there and receive the honorary degree of LL.D. I took that opportunity to spend a week in Hannibal—a city now, a village in my time. It had been fifty-three years since Tom Nash and I had that adventure. When I was at the train station ready to leave Hannibal, a crowd of locals gathered. I saw Tom Nash walking toward me across an open area, and I headed over to him, recognizing him immediately. He was old and gray-haired, but the fifteen-year-old boy was still there in him. He approached me, cupped his hands to my ear, nodded toward the crowd, and said confidentially—in a yell like a foghorn—
"Same damned fools, Sam!"
"Same stupid fools, Sam!"
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Papa was about twenty years old when he went on the Mississippi as a pilot. Just before he started on his tripp Grandma Clemens asked him to promise her on the Bible not to touch intoxicating liquors or swear, and he said "Yes, mother, I will," and he kept that promise seven years when Grandma released him from it.
Dad was about twenty years old when he became a pilot on the Mississippi. Just before he left for his trip, Grandma Clemens asked him to promise her on the Bible that he wouldn’t drink alcohol or swear, and he said, “Sure, Mom, I will.” He kept that promise for seven years until Grandma let him off the hook.
Under the inspiring influence of that remark, what a garden of forgotten reforms rises upon my sight!
Under the inspiring influence of that remark, what a garden of forgotten reforms appears before me!
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
To Be Continued.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCIII.
NOVEMBER 16, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—VI.
BY MARK TWAIN.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Biography.
Papa made arrangements to read at Vassar College the 1st of May, and I went with him. We went by way of New York City. Mamma went with us to New York and stayed two days to do some shopping. We started Tuesday, at ½ past two o'clock in the afternoon, and reached New York about ¼ past six. Papa went right up to General Grants from the station and mamma and I went to the Everett House. Aunt Clara came to supper with us up in our room....
Dad was scheduled to give a reading at Vassar College on May 1st, and I went with him. We took the route through New York City. Mom traveled with us to New York and stayed for two days to do some shopping. We left on Tuesday at 2:30 PM and arrived in New York around 6:15 PM. Dad went straight to General Grant's place from the station while Mom and I went to the Everett House. Aunt Clara joined us for dinner in our room....
We and Aunt Clara were going were going to the theatre right after supper, and we expected papa to take us there and to come home as early as he could. But we got through dinner and he didn't come, and didn't come, and mamma got more perplexed and worried, but at last[Pg 962] we thought we would have to go without him. So we put on our things and started down stairs but before we'd goten half down we met papa coming up with a great bunch of roses in his hand. He explained that the reason he was so late was that his watch stopped and he didn't notice and kept thinking it an hour earlier than it really was. The roses he carried were some Col. Fred Grant sent to mamma. We went to the theatre and enjoyed "Adonis" [word illegible] acted very much. We reached home about ½ past eleven o'clock and went right to bed. Wednesday morning we got up rather late and had breakfast about ½ past nine o'clock. After breakfast mamma went out shopping and papa and I went to see papa's agent about some business matters. After papa had gotten through talking to Cousin Charlie, [Webster] papa's agent, we went to get a friend of papa's, Major Pond, to go and see a Dog Show with us. Then we went to see the dogs with Major Pond and we had a delightful time seeing so many dogs together; when we got through seeing the dogs papa thought he would go and see General Grant and I went with him—this was April 29, 1885. Papa went up into General Grant's room and he took me with him, I felt greatly honored and delighted when papa took me into General Grant's room and let me see the General and Col. Grant, for General Grant is a man I shall be glad all my life that I have seen. Papa and General Grant had a long talk together and papa has written an account of his talk and visit with General Grant for me to put into this biography.
Aunt Clara and I were planning to go to the theater right after dinner, expecting Dad to drive us and return home as soon as he could. But after we finished dinner, he still hadn’t shown up, and Mom became more anxious and worried. Eventually, we thought we would have to go without him. So we put on our coats and started downstairs, but halfway down, we ran into Dad coming up with a big bunch of roses in his hand. He explained he was late because his watch had stopped, and he hadn’t realized it, thinking it was an hour earlier than it actually was. The roses were a gift from Col. Fred Grant for Mom. We went to the theater and really enjoyed "Adonis," which was performed excellently. We got home around 11:30 PM and went straight to bed. On Wednesday morning, we woke up a bit late and had breakfast around 9:30 AM. After breakfast, Mom went shopping, and Dad and I went to meet his agent about some business matters. Once Dad finished talking to Cousin Charlie, [Webster], Dad's agent, we went to pick up one of Dad's friends, Major Pond, to join us for a Dog Show. We had a great time looking at all the dogs, and after that, Dad decided to visit General Grant, and I went with him—this was April 29, 1885. Dad went up to General Grant’s room and took me along. I felt so honored and excited when Dad let me meet General Grant and Col. Grant because I'll always cherish the fact that I got to see General Grant. Dad and General Grant had a long conversation, and Dad wrote up a summary of their talk and visit for me to include in this biography.
Susy has inserted in this place that account of mine—as follows:
Susy has included my account here—it's as follows:
April 29, 1885.
April 29, 1885.
I called on General Grant and took Susy with me. The General was looking and feeling far better than he had looked or felt for some months. He had ventured to work again on his book that morning—the first time he had done any work for perhaps a month. This morning's work was his first attempt at dictating, and it was a thorough success, to his great delight. He had always said that it would be impossible for him to dictate anything, but I had said that he was noted for clearness of statement, and as a narrative was simply a statement of consecutive facts, he was consequently peculiarly qualified and equipped for dictation. This turned out to be true. For he had dictated two hours that morning to a shorthand writer, had never hesitated for words, had not repeated himself, and the manuscript when finished needed no revision. The two hours' work was an account of Appomattox—and this was such an extremely important feature that his book would necessarily have been severely lame without it. Therefore I had taken a shorthand writer there before, to see if I could not get him to write at least a few lines about Appomattox.[5] But he was at that time not well enough to undertake it. I was aware that of all the hundred ver[Pg 963]sions of Appomattox, not one was really correct. Therefore I was extremely anxious that he should leave behind him the truth. His throat was not distressing him, and his voice was much better and stronger than usual. He was so delighted to have gotten Appomattox accomplished once more in his life—to have gotten the matter off his mind—that he was as talkative as his old self. He received Susy very pleasantly, and then fell to talking about certain matters which he hoped to be able to dictate next day; and he said in substance that, among other things, he wanted to settle once for all a question that had been bandied about from mouth to mouth and from newspaper to newspaper. That question was, "With whom originated the idea of the march to the sea? Was it Grant's, or was it Sherman's idea?" Whether I, or some one else (being anxious to get the important fact settled) asked him with whom the idea originated, I don't remember. But I remember his answer. I shall always remember his answer. General Grant said:
I visited General Grant and took Susy with me. The General looked and felt much better than he had in months. That morning, he had the chance to work on his book for the first time in about a month. His morning session was his first attempt at dictating, and it was a complete success, which excited him. He had always thought it would be impossible for him to dictate anything, but I argued that he was known for his clear statements, and since a narrative is just a series of connected facts, he was particularly suited for dictation. This turned out to be true. He dictated for two hours to a shorthand writer, never hesitating for words, not repeating himself, and the finished manuscript needed no revisions. Those two hours were focused on Appomattox, which was such an essential part of his book that it would have been severely lacking without it. I had previously brought a shorthand writer to see if I could get Grant to write at least a few lines about Appomattox, but at that time, he wasn’t well enough to do it. I knew that among the many versions of Appomattox, none were truly accurate. So, I was very eager for him to leave behind the truth. His throat wasn’t bothering him, and his voice was much stronger and clearer than usual. He was excited to tackle Appomattox again in his life—to lift that weight off his mind—so he was as talkative as he used to be. He warmly welcomed Susy and then started discussing topics he hoped to dictate the next day; essentially, he wanted to finally settle a question that had been debated in conversations and newspapers. That question was, "Who came up with the idea of the march to the sea? Was it Grant’s idea, or was it Sherman’s?" I can’t recall if it was me or someone else (eager to clarify the important fact) who asked him where the idea originated, but I do remember his answer. I will always remember his answer. General Grant said:
"Neither of us originated the idea of Sherman's march to the sea. The enemy did it."
"Neither of us came up with the idea of Sherman's march to the sea. The enemy did."
He went on to say that the enemy, however, necessarily originated a great many of the plans that the general on the opposite side gets the credit for; at the same time that the enemy is doing that, he is laying open other moves which the opposing general sees and takes advantage of. In this case, Sherman had a plan all thought out, of course. He meant to destroy the two remaining railroads in that part of the country, and that would finish up that region. But General Hood did not play the military part that he was expected to play. On the contrary, General Hood made a dive at Chattanooga. This left the march to the sea open to Sherman, and so after sending part of his army to defend and hold what he had acquired in the Chattanooga region, he was perfectly free to proceed, with the rest of it, through Georgia. He saw the opportunity, and he would not have been fit for his place if he had not seized it.
He went on to explain that the enemy actually came up with many of the strategies that the opposing general gets credited for; meanwhile, the enemy also exposes other moves that the other general notices and takes advantage of. In this situation, Sherman had a plan all worked out, of course. He intended to destroy the two remaining railroads in that area, which would wrap things up for that region. But General Hood didn’t act as expected. Instead, General Hood launched an attack on Chattanooga. This opened up the route to the sea for Sherman, so after sending part of his army to defend and secure what he had gained in the Chattanooga area, he was completely free to move the rest of his forces through Georgia. He saw the opportunity, and he wouldn’t have been fit for his role if he hadn’t taken it.
"He wrote me" (the General is speaking) "what his plan was, and I sent him word to go ahead. My staff were opposed to the movement." (I think the General said they tried to persuade him to stop Sherman. The chief of his staff, the General said, even went so far as to go to Washington without the General's knowledge and get the ear of the authorities, and he succeeded in arousing their fears to such an extent that they telegraphed General Grant to stop Sherman.)
"He wrote to me" (the General is speaking) "about his plan, and I told him to go for it. My staff didn’t agree with the movement." (I think the General said they tried to convince him to stop Sherman. The chief of his staff, the General mentioned, even went to Washington without the General knowing and managed to get the attention of the authorities, and he succeeded in stirring up their fears so much that they telegraphed General Grant to stop Sherman.)
Then General Grant said, "Out of deference to the Government, I telegraphed Sherman and stopped him twenty-four hours; and then considering that that was deference enough to the Government, I telegraphed him to go ahead again."
Then General Grant said, "Out of respect for the Government, I texted Sherman and held him back for twenty-four hours; and then, thinking that was enough respect for the Government, I messaged him to proceed again."
I have not tried to give the General's language, but only the general idea of what he said. The thing that mainly struck me was his terse remark that the enemy originated the idea of the march to the sea. It struck me because it was so suggestive of the General's epigrammatic fashion—saying a great deal in a single crisp sentence. (This is my account, and signed "Mark Twain.")
I haven't tried to replicate the General's exact words, but rather just the overall idea of what he said. What really stood out to me was his concise statement that the enemy came up with the idea of the march to the sea. It caught my attention because it reflected the General's knack for expressing a lot in just one sharp sentence. (This is my account, and signed "Mark Twain.")
[Pg 964]Susy Resumes.
Susy Resumes.
After papa and General Grant had had their talk, we went back to the hotel where mamma was, and papa told mamma all about his interview with General Grant. Mamma and I had a nice quiet afternoon together.
After Dad and General Grant wrapped up their chat, we headed back to the hotel where Mom was, and Dad filled her in on everything from his meeting with General Grant. Mom and I enjoyed a nice, relaxing afternoon together.
That pair of devoted comrades were always shutting themselves up together when there was opportunity to have what Susy called "a cozy time." From Susy's nursery days to the end of her life, she and her mother were close friends; intimate friends, passionate adorers of each other. Susy's was a beautiful mind, and it made her an interesting comrade. And with the fine mind she had a heart like her mother's. Susy never had an interest or an occupation which she was not glad to put aside for that something which was in all cases more precious to her—a visit with her mother. Susy died at the right time, the fortunate time of life; the happy age—twenty-four years. At twenty-four, such a girl has seen the best of life—life as a happy dream. After that age the risks begin; responsibility comes, and with it the cares, the sorrows, and the inevitable tragedy. For her mother's sake I would have brought her back from the grave if I could, but I would not have done it for my own.
That pair of devoted friends always locked themselves away together whenever they had the chance for what Susy called "a cozy time." From Susy's childhood through her whole life, she and her mother were best friends—close, intimate, and deeply in love with each other. Susy had a beautiful mind, which made her a fascinating companion. Along with her sharp intellect, she shared her mother's loving heart. Susy was never interested in anything or busy with any activity that she wouldn't gladly set aside for something she valued even more—a visit with her mom. Susy passed away at just the right moment, the perfect age—twenty-four years old. At twenty-four, a girl like her has experienced the best of life—life as a joyful dream. After that age, the risks start; responsibilities arise, bringing cares, sorrows, and unavoidable tragedies. For her mother's sake, I would have brought her back from the dead if I could, but I wouldn’t have done it for my own sake.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Then papa went to read in public; there were a great many authors that read, that Thursday afternoon, beside papa; I would have liked to have gone and heard papa read, but papa said he was going to read in Vassar just what he was planning to read in New York, so I stayed at home with mamma.
Then Dad went to read in public; a lot of authors were reading that Thursday afternoon, along with him. I wanted to go and listen to him read, but Dad said he was going to read at Vassar exactly what he planned to read in New York, so I stayed home with Mom.
The next day mamma planned to take the four o'clock car back to Hartford. We rose quite early that morning and went to the Vienna Bakery and took breakfast there. From there we went to a German bookstore and bought some German books for Clara's birthday.
The next day, Mom planned to take the four o'clock train back to Hartford. We woke up early that morning and went to the Vienna Bakery for breakfast. After that, we visited a German bookstore and bought some German books for Clara's birthday.
Dear me, the power of association to snatch mouldy dead memories out of their graves and make them walk! That remark about buying foreign books throws a sudden white glare upon the distant past; and I see the long stretch of a New York street with an unearthly vividness, and John Hay walking down it, grave and remorseful. I was walking down it too, that morning, and I overtook Hay and asked him what the trouble was. He turned a lustreless eye upon me and said:
Dear me, the power of association to bring dusty old memories back to life! That comment about buying foreign books suddenly lights up the distant past; I see a long New York street in a haunting clarity, with John Hay walking down it, serious and regretful. I was walking down that street too that morning, and I caught up with Hay and asked him what was wrong. He looked at me with a dull gaze and said:
"My case is beyond cure. In the most innocent way in the world I have committed a crime which will never be forgiven[Pg 965] by the sufferers, for they will never believe—oh, well, no, I was going to say they would never believe that I did the thing innocently. The truth is they will know that I acted innocently, because they are rational people; but what of that? I never can look them in the face again—nor they me, perhaps."
"My situation is hopeless. I've committed a crime in the most innocent way possible that will never be forgiven[Pg 965] by those affected, as they will never accept—oh, actually, I was about to say they wouldn’t believe that I acted innocently. The reality is they will understand that my intentions were pure because they are reasonable people; but what does that matter? I can never face them again—nor will they want to face me, either."
Hay was a young bachelor, and at that time was on the "Tribune" staff. He explained his trouble in these words, substantially:
Hay was a young bachelor, and at that time he was part of the "Tribune" team. He explained his problem like this:
"When I was passing along here yesterday morning on my way down-town to the office, I stepped into a bookstore where I am acquainted, and asked if they had anything new from the other side. They handed me a French novel, in the usual yellow paper cover, and I carried it away. I didn't even look at the title of it. It was for recreation reading, and I was on my way to my work. I went mooning and dreaming along, and I think I hadn't gone more than fifty yards when I heard my name called. I stopped, and a private carriage drew up at the sidewalk and I shook hands with the inmates—mother and young daughter, excellent people. They were on their way to the steamer to sail for Paris. The mother said,
"When I was walking by here yesterday morning on my way to the office, I popped into a bookstore I know and asked if they had anything new from abroad. They handed me a French novel with the usual yellow paper cover, and I took it with me. I didn’t even check the title. It was for light reading, and I was heading to work. I was lost in thought and hadn’t gone more than fifty yards when I heard someone calling my name. I stopped, and a private carriage pulled up to the sidewalk. I shook hands with the people inside— a mother and her young daughter, really nice folks. They were on their way to catch a steamer to Paris. The mother said,
"'I saw that book in your hand and I judged by the look of it that it was a French novel. Is it?'
"I saw that book in your hand, and I could tell by its appearance that it was a French novel. Is it?"
"I said it was.
"I said it was."
"She said, 'Do let me have it, so that my daughter can practise her French on it on the way over.'
"She said, 'Please let me have it, so my daughter can practice her French on the way over.'"
"Of course I handed her the book, and we parted. Ten minutes ago I was passing that bookstore again, and I stepped in and fetched away another copy of that book. Here it is. Read the first page of it. That is enough. You will know what the rest is like. I think it must be the foulest book in the French language—one of the foulest, anyway. I would be ashamed to offer it to a harlot—but, oh dear, I gave it to that sweet young girl without shame. Take my advice; don't give away a book until you have examined it."
"Of course, I gave her the book, and we went our separate ways. Ten minutes ago, I walked by that bookstore again, so I went in and grabbed another copy of that book. Here it is. Just read the first page. That’s all you need. You’ll know what the rest is like. I think it’s probably the most disgusting book in the French language—at least one of the most disgusting. I would be embarrassed to give it to a prostitute—but, oh well, I handed it to that sweet young girl without a second thought. Take my advice: don’t give away a book until you’ve looked it over."
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
Then mamma and I went to do some shopping and papa went to see General Grant. After we had finnished doing our shopping we went home to the hotel together. When we entered our rooms in the hotel we saw on the table a vase full of exquisett red roses. Mamma who is very fond of flowers exclaimed "Oh I wonder who could have sent[Pg 966] them." We both looked at the card in the midst of the roses and saw that it was written on in papa's handwriting, it was written in German. 'Liebes Geshchenk on die mamma.' [I am sure I didn't say "on"—that is Susy's spelling, not mine; also I am sure I didn't spell Geschenk so liberally as all that.—S. L. C.] Mamma was delighted. Papa came home and gave mamma her ticket; and after visiting a while with her went to see Major Pond and mamma and I sat down to our lunch. After lunch most of our time was taken up with packing, and at about three o'clock we went to escort mamma to the train. We got on board the train with her and stayed with her about five minutes and then we said good-bye to her and the train started for Hartford. It was the first time I had ever beene away from home without mamma in my life, although I was 13 yrs. old. Papa and I drove back to the hotel and got Major Pond and then went to see the Brooklyn Bridge we went across it to Brooklyn on the cars and then walked back across it from Brooklyn to New York. We enjoyed looking at the beautiful scenery and we could see the bridge moove under the intense heat of the sun. We had a perfectly delightful time, but weer pretty tired when we got back to the hotel.
Mom and I went shopping while Dad visited General Grant. After shopping, we returned to the hotel together. When we walked into our hotel room, we saw a beautiful vase of red roses on the table. Mom, who loves flowers, said, "Oh, I wonder who could have sent[Pg 966] them." We glanced at the card among the roses and noticed it was in Dad's handwriting in German: 'Liebes Geschenk an die Mama.' [I’m sure I didn’t say “on”—that’s Susy’s spelling, not mine; also, I'm sure I didn’t spell Geschenk that loosely.—S. L. C.] Mom was so happy. Dad came home and handed Mom her ticket; after talking to her for a while, he went to see Major Pond while Mom and I had lunch. After lunch, we mostly spent our time packing, and around three o'clock, we went to see Mom off at the train. We boarded the train with her and stayed for about five minutes before saying goodbye as the train set off for Hartford. It was the first time I had ever been away from home without Mom, even though I was 13. Dad and I drove back to the hotel, picked up Major Pond, and then went to check out the Brooklyn Bridge. We took the subway to Brooklyn and then walked back across the bridge to New York. We enjoyed the gorgeous views and felt the bridge sway in the intense heat of the sun. We had an amazing time, but we were pretty tired when we got back to the hotel.
The next morning we rose early, took our breakfast and took an early train to Poughkeepsie. We had a very pleasant journey to Poughkeepsie. The Hudson was magnificent—shrouded with beautiful mist. When we arived at Poughkeepsie it was raining quite hard; which fact greatly dissapointed me because I very much wanted to see the outside of the buildings of Vassar College and as it rained that would be impossible. It was quite a long drive from the station to Vasser College and papa and I had a nice long time to discuss and laugh over German profanity. One of the German phrases papa particularly enjoys is "O heilige maria Mutter Jesus!" Jean has a German nurse, and this was one of her phrases, there was a time when Jean exclaimed "Ach Gott!" to every trifle, but when mamma found it out she was shocked and instantly put a stop to it.
The next morning we woke up early, had breakfast, and caught an early train to Poughkeepsie. The trip to Poughkeepsie was really nice. The Hudson was beautiful—shrouded in mist. When we got to Poughkeepsie, it was pouring rain, which really bummed me out because I wanted to see the outside of Vassar College's buildings, and that wasn’t possible in the rain. The drive from the station to Vassar College was quite long, and Dad and I had a great time joking and laughing about German swear words. One of Dad's favorite German phrases is "O heilige Maria Mutter Jesus!" Jean has a German nurse, and this was one of her expressions. There was a time when Jean would say "Ach Gott!" about everything, but when Mom found out, she was shocked and quickly put a stop to it.
It brings that pretty little German girl vividly before me—a sweet and innocent and plump little creature with peachy cheeks; a clear-souled little maiden and without offence, notwithstanding her profanities, and she was loaded to the eyebrows with them. She was a mere child. She was not fifteen yet. She was just from Germany, and knew no English. She was always scattering her profanities around, and they were such a satisfaction to me that I never dreamed of such a thing as modifying her. For my own sake, I had no disposition to tell on her. Indeed I took pains to keep her from being found out. I told her to confine her religious exercises to the children's quarters, and urged her to remember that Mrs. Clemens was prejudiced against pieties on week-days. To the children, the little maid's[Pg 967] profanities sounded natural and proper and right, because they had been used to that kind of talk in Germany, and they attached no evil importance to it. It grieves me that I have forgotten those vigorous remarks. I long hoarded them in my memory as a treasure. But I remember one of them still, because I heard it so many times. The trial of that little creature's life was the children's hair. She would tug and strain with her comb, accompanying her work with her misplaced pieties. And when finally she was through with her triple job she always fired up and exploded her thanks toward the sky, where they belonged, in this form: "Gott sei Dank ich bin fertig mit'm Gott verdammtes Haar!" (I believe I am not quite brave enough to translate it.)
It brings to mind that cute little German girl—a sweet, innocent, chubby kid with rosy cheeks; a clear-hearted girl who, despite her swearing, meant no harm, and she had plenty of it. She was just a child. She wasn't even fifteen yet. She had just come from Germany and didn't know any English. She was constantly throwing around her curses, and they amused me so much that I never even thought about trying to change her behavior. For my own sake, I didn't want to tell on her. In fact, I made an effort to keep her out of trouble. I advised her to limit her religious talks to the kids' area and reminded her that Mrs. Clemens was not fond of piousness during the week. To the kids, the little girl's[Pg 967] swearing seemed perfectly normal and acceptable because they were used to that kind of language back in Germany, and they didn't attach any negative significance to it. It saddens me that I’ve forgotten those colorful expressions. I once cherished them as a treasure. But I still remember one of them because I heard it so often. The toughest part of that little girl's day was dealing with the children's hair. She would pull and tug with her comb, all while mixing in her misplaced pieties. And when she finally finished with her three-part task, she would always look up and shout her thanks to the sky where they belonged, saying: "Gott sei Dank ich bin fertig mit'm Gott verdammtes Haar!" (I don't think I'm quite brave enough to translate it.)
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
We at length reached Vassar College and she looked very finely, her buildings and her grounds being very beautiful. We went to the front doore and range the bell. The young girl who came to the doore wished to know who we wanted to see. Evidently we were not expected. Papa told her who we wanted to see and she showed us to the parlor. We waited, no one came; and waited, no one came, still no one came. It was beginning to seem pretty awkward, "Oh well this is a pretty piece of business," papa exclaimed. At length we heard footsteps coming down the long corridor and Miss C, (the lady who had invited papa) came into the room. She greeted papa very pleasantly and they had a nice little chatt together. Soon the lady principal also entered and she was very pleasant and agreable. She showed us to our rooms and said she would send for us when dinner was ready. We went into our rooms, but we had nothing to do for half an hour exept to watch the rain drops as they fell upon the window panes. At last we were called to dinner, and I went down without papa as he never eats anything in the middle of the day. I sat at the table with the lady principal and enjoyed very much seeing all the young girls trooping into the dining-room. After dinner I went around the College with the young ladies and papa stayed in his room and smoked. When it was supper time papa went down and ate supper with us and we had a very delightful supper. After supper the young ladies went to their rooms to dress for the evening. Papa went to his room and I went with the lady principal. At length the guests began to arive, but papa still remained in his room until called for. Papa read in the chapell. It was the first time I had ever heard him read in my life—that is in public. When he came out on to the stage I remember the people behind me exclaimed "Oh how queer he is! Isn't he funny!" I thought papa was very funny, although I did not think him queer. He read "A Trying Situation" and "The Golden Arm," a ghost story that he heard down South when he was a little boy. "The Golden Arm" papa had told me before, but he had startled me so that[Pg 968] I did not much wish to hear it again. But I had resolved this time to be prepared and not to let myself be startled, but still papa did, and very very much; he startled the whole roomful of people and they jumped as one man. The other story was also very funny and interesting and I enjoyed the evening inexpressibly much. After papa had finished reading we all went down to the collation in the dining-room and after that there was dancing and singing. Then the guests went away and papa and I went to bed. The next morning we rose early, took an early train for Hartford and reached Hartford at ½ past 2 o'clock. We were very glad to get back.
We finally got to Vassar College, and it looked amazing, with its beautiful buildings and grounds. We went to the front door and rang the bell. The young girl who answered asked who we were looking for. Clearly, we weren't expected. Dad told her who we wanted to see, and she took us to the parlor. We waited, but no one came; we waited some more, but still no one came. It was starting to feel pretty awkward. "Oh well, this is a bit of a situation," Dad said. Eventually, we heard footsteps coming down the long hallway, and Miss C, the woman who had invited Dad, walked into the room. She warmly greeted Dad, and they had a nice little chat. Soon, the lady principal came in too, and she was very friendly and pleasant. She showed us to our rooms and said she'd call us when dinner was ready. We went into our rooms, but we had nothing to do for half an hour except watch the raindrops on the window panes. Finally, we were called to dinner, and I went down without Dad since he never eats anything in the middle of the day. I sat at the table with the lady principal and really enjoyed watching all the young girls come into the dining room. After dinner, I toured the college with the young ladies while Dad stayed in his room to smoke. When it was supper time, Dad came down to join us, and we had a lovely meal. After supper, the young ladies went to their rooms to get dressed for the evening. Dad went to his room, and I went with the lady principal. Eventually, the guests started to arrive, but Dad stayed in his room until he was called. Dad read in the chapel. It was the first time I had ever heard him read in public. When he stepped onto the stage, I remember the people behind me saying, "Oh, how strange he is! Isn't he funny?" I thought Dad was really funny, although I didn't find him strange. He read "A Trying Situation" and "The Golden Arm," a ghost story he'd heard down South when he was a little boy. Dad had told me "The Golden Arm" before, but he had scared me so much that I didn't really want to hear it again. This time, I had decided to be ready and not get scared, but Dad still surprised me, a lot. He startled the entire roomful of people, and they all jumped at once. The other story was also really funny and interesting, and I enjoyed the evening immensely. After Dad finished reading, we all went down for refreshments in the dining room, and then there was dancing and singing. After that, the guests left, and Dad and I went to bed. The next morning, we got up early, took an early train to Hartford, and arrived there at 2:30. We were really glad to be back.
How charitably she treats that ghastly experience! It is a dear and lovely disposition, and a most valuable one, that can brush away indignities and discourtesies and seek and find the pleasanter features of an experience. Susy had that disposition, and it was one of the jewels of her character that had come to her straight from her mother. It is a feature that was left out of me at birth. And, at seventy, I have not yet acquired it. I did not go to Vassar College professionally, but as a guest—as a guest, and gratis. Aunt Clara (now Mrs. John B. Stanchfield) was a graduate of Vassar and it was to please her that I inflicted that journey upon Susy and myself. The invitation had come to me from both the lady mentioned by Susy and the President of the College—a sour old saint who has probably been gathered to his fathers long ago; and I hope they enjoy him; I hope they value his society. I think I can get along without it, in either end of the next world.
How kindly she looks back on that awful experience! It’s such a sweet and lovely quality to be able to overlook indignities and rudeness and instead focus on the nicer aspects of a situation. Susy had that quality, and it was one of the treasures of her character that she inherited directly from her mother. It’s something I was never given at birth. And at seventy, I still haven’t picked it up. I didn’t attend Vassar College for a degree, but as a guest—just a guest, and for free. Aunt Clara (now Mrs. John B. Stanchfield) graduated from Vassar, and it was to make her happy that I took that trip with Susy. The invitation came to me from both the woman Susy mentioned and the President of the College—a grumpy old saint who has probably passed away long ago; I hope they’re enjoying his company wherever he is; I hope they appreciate having him around. I think I can manage just fine without it, on either side of the afterlife.
We arrived at the College in that soaking rain, and Susy has described, with just a suggestion of dissatisfaction, the sort of reception we got. Susy had to sit in her damp clothes half an hour while we waited in the parlor; then she was taken to a fireless room and left to wait there again, as she has stated. I do not remember that President's name, and I am sorry. He did not put in an appearance until it was time for me to step upon the platform in front of that great garden of young and lovely blossoms. He caught up with me and advanced upon the platform with me and was going to introduce me. I said in substance:
We arrived at the college in that pouring rain, and Susy has mentioned, with a hint of disappointment, the kind of reception we received. Susy had to sit in her wet clothes for half an hour while we waited in the parlor; then she was taken to a cold room and left to wait there again, as she has pointed out. I don’t remember the President’s name, and I regret that. He didn’t show up until it was time for me to step onto the platform in front of that beautiful garden of young and lovely faces. He caught up with me and walked onto the platform with me, ready to introduce me. I essentially said:
"You have allowed me to get along without your help thus far, and if you will retire from the platform I will try to do the rest without it."
"You've let me manage on my own without your help up to now, and if you step down from the platform, I'll do my best to continue without it."
I did not see him any more, but I detest his memory. Of[Pg 969] course my resentment did not extend to the students, and so I had an unforgettable good time talking to them. And I think they had a good time too, for they responded "as one man," to use Susy's unimprovable phrase.
I didn't see him again, but I really dislike thinking about him. Of[Pg 969] course, my bitterness didn't include the students, so I had an amazing time chatting with them. I think they enjoyed it too because they responded "as one man," to borrow Susy's perfect phrase.
Girls are charming creatures. I shall have to be twice seventy years old before I change my mind as to that. I am to talk to a crowd of them this afternoon, students of Barnard College (the sex's annex to Columbia University), and I think I shall have as pleasant a time with those lasses as I had with the Vassar girls twenty-one years ago.
Girls are delightful beings. I’ll have to be ninety years old before I change my mind about that. I’m set to speak to a group of them this afternoon, students at Barnard College (the women’s college affiliated with Columbia University), and I believe I’ll enjoy talking to those young women as much as I did with the Vassar girls twenty-one years ago.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
I stopped in the middle of mamma's early history to tell about our tripp to Vassar because I was afraid I would forget about it, now I will go on where I left off. Some time after Miss Emma Nigh died papa took mamma and little Langdon to Elmira for the summer. When in Elmira Langdon began to fail but I think mamma did not know just what was the matter with him.
I took a break from Mom's early history to discuss our trip to Vassar because I was afraid I’d forget it; now I’ll pick up where I left off. Some time after Miss Emma Nigh died, Dad took Mom and little Langdon to Elmira for the summer. While they were in Elmira, Langdon began to get worse, but I don’t think Mom really understood what was happening with him.
I was the cause of the child's illness. His mother trusted him to my care and I took him a long drive in an open barouche for an airing. It was a raw, cold morning, but he was well wrapped about with furs and, in the hands of a careful person, no harm would have come to him. But I soon dropped into a reverie and forgot all about my charge. The furs fell away and exposed his bare legs. By and by the coachman noticed this, and I arranged the wraps again, but it was too late. The child was almost frozen. I hurried home with him. I was aghast at what I had done, and I feared the consequences. I have always felt shame for that treacherous morning's work and have not allowed myself to think of it when I could help it. I doubt if I had the courage to make confession at that time. I think it most likely that I have never confessed until now.
I was responsible for the child's illness. His mother trusted me to take care of him, and I took him on a long drive in an open carriage for some fresh air. It was a chilly, cold morning, but he was wrapped up in furs, and if someone responsible had been taking care of him, nothing bad would have happened. But I quickly fell into a daydream and forgot all about him. The furs slipped off, leaving his bare legs exposed. Eventually, the coachman noticed, and I adjusted the wraps again, but it was too late. The child was almost frozen. I rushed home with him. I was horrified by what I had done, and I worried about the consequences. I've always felt ashamed of that morning's betrayal and have avoided thinking about it whenever possible. I doubt I had the courage to confess back then. I think it's likely I’ve never confessed until now.
From Susy's Biography.
From Susy's Bio.
At last it was time for papa to return to Hartford, and Langdon was real sick at that time, but still mamma decided to go with him, thinking the journey might do him good. But after they reached Hartford he became very sick, and his trouble prooved to be diptheeria. He died about a week after mamma and papa reached Hartford. He was burried by the side of grandpa at Elmira, New York. [Susy rests there with them.—S. L. C.] After that, mamma became very very ill, so ill that there seemed great danger of death, but with a great deal of good[Pg 970] care she recovered. Some months afterward mamma and papa [and Susy, who was perhaps fourteen or fifteen months old at the time.—S.L.C.] went to Europe and stayed for a time in Scotland and England. In Scotland mamma and papa became very well equanted with Dr. John Brown, the author of "Rab and His Friends," and he mett, but was not so well equanted with, Mr. Charles Kingsley, Mr. Henry M. Stanley, Sir Thomas Hardy grandson of the Captain Hardy to whom Nellson said "Kiss me Hardy," when dying on shipboard, Mr. Henry Irving, Robert Browning, Sir Charles Dilke, Mr. Charles Reade, Mr. William Black, Lord Houghton, Frank Buckland, Mr. Tom Hughes, Anthony Trollope, Tom Hood, son of the poet—and mamma and papa were quite well equanted with Dr. Macdonald and family, and papa met Harrison Ainsworth.
Finally, it was time for Dad to return to Hartford, and Langdon was really sick at that time, but Mom decided to go with him, thinking the trip might help. However, after they got to Hartford, he got much worse, and it turned out he had diphtheria. He passed away about a week after Mom and Dad arrived in Hartford. He was buried next to Grandpa in Elmira, New York. [Susy rests there with them.—S. L. C.] After that, Mom got really sick, so ill that there was a serious risk of death, but with a lot of good[Pg 970] care, she pulled through. A few months later, Mom and Dad [and Susy, who was maybe fourteen or fifteen months old at the time.—S.L.C.] went to Europe and stayed for a while in Scotland and England. In Scotland, Mom and Dad became good friends with Dr. John Brown, the author of "Rab and His Friends," and he met, but wasn’t as close to, Mr. Charles Kingsley, Mr. Henry M. Stanley, Sir Thomas Hardy, grandson of Captain Hardy to whom Nelson said "Kiss me Hardy," when dying on shipboard, Mr. Henry Irving, Robert Browning, Sir Charles Dilke, Mr. Charles Reade, Mr. William Black, Lord Houghton, Frank Buckland, Mr. Tom Hughes, Anthony Trollope, Tom Hood, son of the poet—and Mom and Dad became quite well acquainted with Dr. Macdonald and his family, and Dad met Harrison Ainsworth.
I remember all these men very well indeed, except the last one. I do not recall Ainsworth. By my count, Susy mentions fourteen men. They are all dead except Sir Charles Dilke.
I remember all these guys really well, except for the last one. I don’t remember Ainsworth. By my count, Susy mentions fourteen men. They’re all dead except Sir Charles Dilke.
We met a great many other interesting people, among them Lewis Carroll, author of the immortal "Alice"—but he was only interesting to look at, for he was the stillest and shyest full-grown man I have ever met except "Uncle Remus." Dr. Macdonald and several other lively talkers were present, and the talk went briskly on for a couple of hours, but Carroll sat still all the while except that now and then he answered a question. His answers were brief. I do not remember that he elaborated any of them.
We met a lot of other fascinating people, including Lewis Carroll, the author of the timeless "Alice." But he was just interesting to look at, as he was the quietest and shyest adult I've ever met, except for "Uncle Remus." Dr. Macdonald and several other engaging speakers were there, and the conversation flowed energetically for a couple of hours, but Carroll just sat there the whole time, only occasionally answering a question. His responses were short. I don't remember him expanding on any of them.
At a dinner at Smalley's we met Herbert Spencer. At a large luncheon party at Lord Houghton's we met Sir Arthur Helps, who was a celebrity of world-wide fame at the time, but is quite forgotten now. Lord Elcho, a large vigorous man, sat at some distance down the table. He was talking earnestly about Godalming. It was a deep and flowing and unarticulated rumble, but I got the Godalming pretty clearly every time it broke free of the rumble, and as all the strength was on the first end of the word it startled me every time, because it sounded so like swearing. In the middle of the luncheon Lady Houghton rose, remarked to the guests on her right and on her left in a matter-of-fact way, "Excuse me, I have an engagement," and without further ceremony she went off to meet it. This would have been doubtful etiquette in America. Lord Houghton told a number of delightful stories. He told them in French, and I lost nothing of them but the nubs.
At a dinner at Smalley's, we met Herbert Spencer. At a big luncheon with Lord Houghton, we encountered Sir Arthur Helps, who was famous all over the world at that time but has since been forgotten. Lord Elcho, a large, energetic man, sat a bit farther down the table. He was passionately discussing Godalming. It was a deep, flowing mumble, but I caught the name Godalming pretty clearly every time it broke through the mumbling, and because all the emphasis was on the first part of the word, it surprised me each time, since it sounded a lot like swearing. In the middle of the luncheon, Lady Houghton stood up, casually told the guests on either side of her, "Excuse me, I have an appointment," and without any further formality, she left to attend to it. This would have been questionable etiquette in America. Lord Houghton shared a bunch of delightful stories. He told them in French, and I missed only the little details.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
FOOTNOTE:
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCIV.
DECEMBER 7, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—VII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
I was always heedless. I was born heedless; and therefore I was constantly, and quite unconsciously, committing breaches of the minor proprieties, which brought upon me humiliations which ought to have humiliated me but didn't, because I didn't know anything had happened. But Livy knew; and so the humiliations fell to her share, poor child, who had not earned them and did not deserve them. She always said I was the most difficult child she had. She was very sensitive about me. It distressed her to see me do heedless things which could bring me under criticism, and so she was always watchful and alert to protect me from the kind of transgressions which I have been speaking of.
I was always careless. I was born careless; and because of that, I was constantly and quite unconsciously breaking minor social rules, which led to humiliations that should have embarrassed me, but didn’t, because I didn’t realize anything had happened. But Livy knew; so the humiliations fell on her, poor girl, who hadn’t caused them and didn’t deserve them. She always said I was the hardest child to deal with. She was very sensitive about me. It upset her to see me do careless things that could lead to criticism, so she was always watchful and alert to protect me from the kind of mistakes I’ve been talking about.
[Pg 1090]When I was leaving Hartford for Washington, upon the occasion referred to, she said: "I have written a small warning and put it in a pocket of your dress-vest. When you are dressing to go to the Authors' Reception at the White House you will naturally put your fingers in your vest pockets, according to your custom, and you will find that little note there. Read it carefully, and do as it tells you. I cannot be with you, and so I delegate my sentry duties to this little note. If I should give you the warning by word of mouth, now, it would pass from your head and be forgotten in a few minutes."
[Pg 1090]When I was leaving Hartford for Washington, she said, "I’ve written a little warning and tucked it into a pocket of your dress vest. When you get ready for the Authors' Reception at the White House, you’ll naturally check your vest pockets, and you’ll find that note there. Read it carefully and follow its instructions. I can’t be with you, so I’m handing over my watchful duties to this note. If I were to give you the warning face-to-face right now, you’d probably forget it in a few minutes."
It was President Cleveland's first term. I had never seen his wife—the young, the beautiful, the good-hearted, the sympathetic, the fascinating. Sure enough, just as I had finished dressing to go to the White House I found that little note, which I had long ago forgotten. It was a grave little note, a serious little note, like its writer, but it made me laugh. Livy's gentle gravities often produced that effect upon me, where the expert humorist's best joke would have failed, for I do not laugh easily.
It was President Cleveland's first term. I had never seen his wife—the young, beautiful, kind-hearted, sympathetic, captivating woman. Sure enough, just as I had finished getting ready to go to the White House, I found that little note, which I had completely forgotten about. It was a serious little note, just like its writer, but it made me laugh. Livy's gentle seriousness often had that effect on me, where the best joke from a skilled comedian would have fallen flat, because I don’t laugh easily.
When we reached the White House and I was shaking hands with the President, he started to say something, but I interrupted him and said:
When we got to the White House and I was shaking hands with the President, he started to say something, but I interrupted him and said:
"If your Excellency will excuse me, I will come back in a moment; but now I have a very important matter to attend to, and it must be attended to at once."
"If you don’t mind, I’ll be right back; but I have something very important to take care of, and it needs my attention immediately."
I turned to Mrs. Cleveland, the young, the beautiful, the fascinating, and gave her my card, on the back of which I had written "He didn't"—and I asked her to sign her name below those words.
I turned to Mrs. Cleveland, the young, the beautiful, the captivating, and gave her my card, on the back of which I had written "He didn't"—and I asked her to sign her name underneath those words.
She said: "He didn't? He didn't what?"
She said, "He didn’t? What didn’t he do?"
"Oh," I said, "never mind. We cannot stop to discuss that now. This is urgent. Won't you please sign your name?" (I handed her a fountain-pen.)
"Oh," I said, "never mind. We can't stop to discuss that right now. This is urgent. Will you please sign your name?" (I handed her a fountain pen.)
"Why," she said, "I cannot commit myself in that way. Who is it that didn't?—and what is it that he didn't?"
"Why," she said, "I can't make that kind of commitment. Who didn't?—and what is it that they didn't do?"
"Oh," I said, "time is flying, flying, flying. Won't you take me out of my distress and sign your name to it? It's all right. I give you my word it's all right."
"Oh," I said, "time is flying by, flying by, flying by. Will you help me out of my distress and sign your name to it? It's fine. I promise you, it's fine."
She looked nonplussed; but hesitatingly and mechanically she took the pen and said:
She looked confused; but slowly and stiffly, she picked up the pen and said:
"I will sign it. I will take the risk. But you must tell me[Pg 1091] all about it, right afterward, so that you can be arrested before you get out of the house in case there should be anything criminal about this."
"I'll sign it. I'm willing to take the risk. But you have to fill me in[Pg 1091] on everything afterward, so that you can be arrested before you leave the house in case there's anything illegal about this."
Then she signed; and I handed her Mrs. Clements's note, which was very brief, very simple, and to the point. It said: "Don't wear your arctics in the White House." It made her shout; and at my request she summoned a messenger and we sent that card at once to the mail on its way to Mrs. Clemens in Hartford.
Then she signed, and I gave her Mrs. Clements's note, which was really short, very straightforward, and direct. It said: "Don't wear your arctics in the White House." It made her laugh out loud; and at my request, she called a messenger, and we sent that card right away to the mail on its way to Mrs. Clemens in Hartford.
When the little Ruth was about a year or a year and a half old, Mason, an old and valued friend of mine, was consul-general at Frankfort-on-the-Main. I had known him well in 1867, '68 and '69, in America, and I and mine had spent a good deal of time with him and his family in Frankfort in '78. He was a thoroughly competent, diligent, and conscientious official. Indeed he possessed these qualities in so large a degree that among American consuls he might fairly be said to be monumental, for at that time our consular service was largely—and I think I may say mainly—in the hands of ignorant, vulgar, and incapable men who had been political heelers in America, and had been taken care of by transference to consulates where they could be supported at the Government's expense instead of being transferred to the poor house, which would have been cheaper and more patriotic. Mason, in '78, had been consul-general in Frankfort several years—four, I think. He had come from Marseilles with a great record. He had been consul there during thirteen years, and one part of his record was heroic. There had been a desolating cholera epidemic, and Mason was the only representative of any foreign country who stayed at his post and saw it through. And during that time he not only represented his own country, but he represented all the other countries in Christendom and did their work, and did it well and was praised for it by them in words of no uncertain sound. This great record of Mason's had saved him from official decapitation straight along while Republican Presidents occupied the chair, but now it was occupied by a Democrat. Mr. Cleveland was not seated in it—he was not yet inaugurated—before he was deluged with applications from Democratic politicians desiring the appointment of a thousand or so politically useful Democrats to Mason's place. A year or two later Mason wrote me and asked me if I couldn't do something to save him from destruction.
When little Ruth was about a year or a year and a half old, Mason, a long-time and valued friend of mine, was the consul-general in Frankfurt am Main. I had known him well back in 1867, '68, and '69 in America, and my family and I spent a lot of time with him and his family in Frankfurt in '78. He was a highly capable, hardworking, and dedicated official. In fact, he had these qualities to such an extent that among American consuls, he could be considered a standout, especially since at that time, our consular service was mostly—and I think I can say mainly—in the hands of ignorant, uncouth, and incompetent individuals who had been political operatives in America. They were shuffled off to consulates where they could be supported at the government’s expense instead of being sent to the poorhouse, which would have been cheaper and more patriotic. By '78, Mason had been consul-general in Frankfurt for several years—four, I believe. He had come from Marseille with an impressive track record. He had served there for thirteen years, and one part of that record was heroic. During a devastating cholera epidemic, Mason was the only foreign representative who stayed at his post and saw it through. During that time, he not only represented his own country but also represented all the other countries in Christendom, handling their affairs well and receiving praise from them in no uncertain terms. This impressive record had protected him from being removed from office while Republican presidents held the position, but now it was in the hands of a Democrat. Mr. Cleveland wasn't even inaugurated before he was flooded with requests from Democratic politicians wanting to appoint a thousand or so politically useful Democrats to replace Mason. A year or two later, Mason wrote to me, asking if I could do something to help save his job.
[Pg 1092]I was very anxious to keep him in his place, but at first I could not think of any way to help him, for I was a mugwump. We, the mugwumps, a little company made up of the unenslaved of both parties, the very best men to be found in the two great parties—that was our idea of it—voted sixty thousand strong for Mr. Cleveland in New York and elected him. Our principles were high, and very definite. We were not a party; we had no candidates; we had no axes to grind. Our vote laid upon the man we cast it for no obligation of any kind. By our rule we could not ask for office; we could not accept office. When voting, it was our duty to vote for the best man, regardless of his party name. We had no other creed. Vote for the best man—that was creed enough.
[Pg 1092]I was really worried about keeping him in check, but at first I couldn’t figure out how to help him because I was a mugwump. We, the mugwumps, a small group made up of the free thinkers from both parties, believed we were the best individuals in the two major parties—at least that’s how we saw it—voted powerfully for Mr. Cleveland in New York and helped elect him. Our principles were noble and clear. We weren’t a party; we didn’t have candidates; we didn’t have any personal interests to promote. Our vote didn’t put any obligation on the person we voted for. By our rules, we couldn’t ask for office; we couldn’t accept office. When it came to voting, our duty was to choose the best person, no matter their party. We had no other belief. Voting for the best person—that was enough of a belief.
Such being my situation, I was puzzled to know how to try to help Mason, and, at the same time, save my mugwump purity undefiled. It was a delicate place. But presently, out of the ruck of confusions in my mind, rose a sane thought, clear and bright—to wit: since it was a mugwump's duty to do his best to put the beet man in office, necessarily it must be a mugwump's duty to try to keep the best man in when he was already there. My course was easy now. It might not be quite delicate for a mugwump to approach the President directly, but I could approach him indirectly, with all delicacy, since in that case not even courtesy would require him to take notice of an application which no one could prove had ever reached him.
Given my situation, I was confused about how to help Mason while also keeping my mugwump integrity intact. It was a tricky position. But soon, amidst the chaos in my mind, a clear and sensible thought emerged: since it was a mugwump's duty to do their best to get the best person in office, it must also be a mugwump's duty to try to keep that best person in office once they were already there. My path was now clear. It might not be entirely proper for a mugwump to approach the President directly, but I could approach him indirectly, with all due care, since in that case, not even politeness would require him to acknowledge a request that could not be proven to have ever reached him.
Yes, it was easy and simple sailing now. I could lay the matter before Ruth, in her cradle, and wait for results. I wrote the little child, and said to her all that I have just been saying about mugwump principles and the limitations which they put upon me. I explained that it would not be proper for me to apply to her father in Mr. Mason's behalf, but I detailed to her Mr. Mason's high and honorable record and suggested that she take the matter in her own hands and do a patriotic work which I felt some delicacy about venturing upon myself. I asked her to forget that her father was only President of the United States, and her subject and servant; I asked her not to put her application in the form of a command, but to modify it, and give it the fictitious and pleasanter form of a mere request—that it would be no harm to let him gratify himself with the superstition that he was independent and could do as he pleased in the[Pg 1093] matter. I begged her to put stress, and plenty of it, upon the proposition that to keep Mason in his place would be a benefaction to the nation; to enlarge upon that, and keep still about all other considerations.
Yes, it was easy and straightforward now. I could lay out the situation for Ruth, in her crib, and wait for what would come of it. I wrote to the little girl and shared everything I've just mentioned about mugwump principles and the limits they impose on me. I explained that it wouldn't be right for me to approach her dad on Mr. Mason's behalf, but I detailed Mr. Mason's impressive and honorable background and suggested that she take the matter into her own hands and do something patriotic that I felt a bit hesitant about doing myself. I asked her to forget that her father was just the President of the United States, and her subject and servant; I requested that she not frame her request as a command, but to soften it and present it as a simple request—that it wouldn't hurt to let him indulge in the illusion that he was independent and could act as he wished in the[Pg 1093] situation. I urged her to emphasize, and put plenty of emphasis on, the idea that keeping Mason in his position would be a benefit to the nation; to elaborate on that and to keep quiet about any other considerations.
In due time I received a letter from the President, written with his own hand, signed by his own hand, acknowledging Ruth's intervention and thanking me for enabling him to save to the country the services of so good and well-tried a servant as Mason, and thanking me, also, for the detailed fulness of Mason's record, which could leave no doubt in any one's mind that Mason was in his right place and ought to be kept there. Mason has remained in the service ever since, and is now consul-general at Paris.
In due time, I got a letter from the President, written and signed by him, acknowledging Ruth's help and thanking me for allowing him to keep such a reliable and dedicated servant as Mason in the country. He also thanked me for the thoroughness of Mason's record, which clearly showed that Mason belonged in his position and should stay there. Mason has stayed in the service ever since and is now the consul-general in Paris.
During the time that we were living in Buffalo in '70-'71, Mr. Cleveland was sheriff, but I never happened to make his acquaintance, or even see him. In fact, I suppose I was not even aware of his existence. Fourteen years later, he was become the greatest man in the State. I was not living in the State at the time. He was Governor, and was about to step into the post of President of the United States. At that time I was on the public highway in company with another bandit, George W. Cable. We were robbing the public with readings from our works during four months—and in the course of time we went to Albany to levy tribute, and I said, "We ought to go and pay our respects to the Governor."
During the time we were living in Buffalo in '70-'71, Mr. Cleveland was the sheriff, but I never got to know him or even see him. In fact, I guess I didn't even know he existed. Fast forward fourteen years, and he had become the most important person in the State. I wasn't living there then. He was Governor and was about to take on the role of President of the United States. At that point, I was on the road with another writer, George W. Cable. We were making money by doing readings from our works for four months—and eventually we went to Albany to collect a tribute, and I said, "We should go and pay our respects to the Governor."
So Cable and I went to that majestic Capitol building and stated our errand. We were shown into the Governor's private office, and I saw Mr. Cleveland for the first time. We three stood chatting together. I was born lazy, and I comforted myself by turning the corner of a table into a sort of seat. Presently the Governor said:
So Cable and I went to that impressive Capitol building and explained our purpose. We were taken into the Governor's private office, and I saw Mr. Cleveland for the first time. The three of us chatted together. I’ve always been a bit lazy, so I made myself comfortable by turning the corner of a table into a sort of seat. Soon, the Governor said:
"Mr. Clemens, I was a fellow citizen of yours in Buffalo a good many months, a good while ago, and during those months you burst suddenly into a mighty fame, out of a previous long-continued and no doubt proper obscurity—but I was a nobody, and you wouldn't notice me nor have anything to do with me. But now that I have become somebody, you have changed your style, and you come here to shake hands with me and be sociable. How do you explain this kind of conduct?"
"Mr. Clemens, I was a fellow citizen of yours in Buffalo for quite a while, a long time ago, and during those months, you suddenly became famous after being in obscurity for a long time, which was probably deserved. But I was a nobody, and you didn’t notice me or want anything to do with me. But now that I’ve become someone, you’ve changed your approach, and you come here to shake hands with me and be friendly. How do you explain this behavior?"
"Oh," I said, "it is very simple, your Excellency. In Buffalo[Pg 1094] you were nothing but a sheriff. I was in society. I couldn't afford to associate with sheriffs. But you are a Governor now, and you are on your way to the Presidency. It is a great difference, and it makes you worth while."
"Oh," I said, "it's very simple, Your Excellency. Back in Buffalo[Pg 1094], you were just a sheriff. I was part of high society. I couldn't afford to hang out with sheriffs. But now you're a Governor, and you're on your way to becoming President. That's a huge difference, and it makes you worthwhile."
There appeared to be about sixteen doors to that spacious room. From each door a young man now emerged, and the sixteen lined up and moved forward and stood in front of the Governor with an aspect of respectful expectancy in their attitude. No one spoke for a moment. Then the Governor said:
There seemed to be about sixteen doors to that spacious room. From each door, a young man stepped out, and the sixteen lined up, moving forward to stand in front of the Governor with a look of respectful anticipation on their faces. No one spoke for a moment. Then the Governor said:
"You are dismissed, gentlemen. Your services are not required. Mr. Clemens is sitting on the bells."
"You can leave now, gentlemen. We don’t need your services anymore. Mr. Clemens is sitting on the bells."
There was a cluster of sixteen bell buttons on the corner of the table; my proportions at that end of me were just right to enable me to cover the whole of that nest, and that is how I came to hatch out those sixteen clerks.
There was a bunch of sixteen doorbell buttons on the corner of the table; my size at that end was just right to let me reach all of them, and that’s how I ended up bringing those sixteen clerks to life.
In accordance with the suggestion made in Gilder's letter recently received I have written the following note to ex-President Cleveland upon his sixty-ninth birthday:
In line with the suggestion in Gilder's recent letter, I've written the following note to former President Cleveland on his sixty-ninth birthday:
Honored Sir:—
Dear Sir:—
Your patriotic virtues have won for you the homage of half the nation and the enmity of the other half. This places your character as a citizen upon a summit as high as Washington's. The verdict is unanimous and unassailable. The votes of both sides are necessary in cases like these, and the votes of the one side are quite as valuable as are the votes of the other. Where the votes are all in a man's favor the verdict is against him. It is sand, and history will wash it away. But the verdict for you is rock, and will stand.
Your love for your country has brought you admiration from half the nation and criticism from the other half. This places your character as a citizen on par with Washington’s. The verdict is clear and undeniable. In situations like this, the views from both sides count, and support from one side is just as crucial as that from the other. When all the votes favor someone, they often face backlash. That feeling is temporary, and history will forget it. But the verdict in your case is strong, and it will last.
S. L. Clemens.
S. L. Clemens.
As of date March 18, 1906....
As of March 18, 1906....
In a diary which Mrs. Clemens kept for a little while, a great many years ago, I find various mentions of Mrs. Harriet Beecher Stowe, who was a near neighbor of ours in Hartford, with no fences between. And in those days she made as much use of our grounds as of her own, in pleasant weather. Her mind had decayed, and she was a pathetic figure. She wandered about all the day long in the care of a muscular Irishwoman. Among the colonists of our neighborhood the doors always stood open in pleasant weather. Mrs. Stowe entered them at her own free will, and as she was always softly slippered and generally full of animal spirits, she was able to deal in surprises, and she liked to do it. She would slip up behind a person who was deep in[Pg 1095] dreams and musings and fetch a war-whoop that would jump that person out of his clothes. And she had other moods. Sometimes we would hear gentle music in the drawing-room and would find her there at the piano singing ancient and melancholy songs with infinitely touching effect.
In a diary that Mrs. Clemens kept for a short time many years ago, I see several mentions of Mrs. Harriet Beecher Stowe, who lived nearby in Hartford, with no fences between us. Back then, she often enjoyed our yard as much as her own when the weather was nice. Her mind had faded, and she had become a sad sight. She wandered around all day under the care of a strong Irishwoman. In our neighborhood, doors were always open on nice days. Mrs. Stowe would walk in whenever she pleased, and since she was always in soft slippers and usually full of energy, she loved to spring surprises on us. She would sneak up behind someone lost in thoughts and give a loud shout that would startle them out of their skin. But she had different moods too. Sometimes we would hear soft music in the drawing room and find her at the piano singing old, sorrowful songs that were incredibly moving.
Her husband, old Professor Stowe, was a picturesque figure. He wore a broad slouch hat. He was a large man, and solemn. His beard was white and thick and hung far down on his breast. The first time our little Susy ever saw him she encountered him on the street near our house and came flying wide-eyed to her mother and said, "Santa Claus has got loose!"
Her husband, old Professor Stowe, was quite a character. He wore a wide-brimmed slouch hat. He was a big guy and looked serious. His beard was thick and white, hanging down to his chest. The first time our little Susy saw him, she spotted him on the street near our house and rushed back to her mom, wide-eyed, saying, "Santa Claus got loose!"
Which reminds me of Rev. Charley Stowe's little boy—a little boy of seven years. I met Rev. Charley crossing his mother's grounds one morning and he told me this little tale. He had been out to Chicago to attend a Convention of Congregational clergymen, and had taken his little boy with him. During the trip he reminded the little chap, every now and then, that he must be on his very best behavior there in Chicago. He said: "We shall be the guests of a clergyman, there will be other guests—clergymen and their wives—and you must be careful to let those people see by your walk and conversation that you are of a godly household. Be very careful about this." The admonition bore fruit. At the first breakfast which they ate in the Chicago clergyman's house he heard his little son say in the meekest and most reverent way to the lady opposite him,
Which reminds me of Rev. Charley Stowe's little boy—a seven-year-old. I ran into Rev. Charley crossing his mother’s yard one morning, and he shared this little story with me. He had gone to Chicago for a Convention of Congregational ministers and brought his son along. Throughout the trip, he kept reminding the little guy to be on his best behavior in Chicago. He said, “We’ll be guests at a minister's house, and there will be other guests—ministers and their wives. You need to show them through your actions and conversation that you come from a godly home. Be very careful about this.” The reminder paid off. At the first breakfast they had in the Chicago minister’s home, he heard his little son say in the meekest and most respectful way to the lady across from him,
"Please, won't you, for Christ's sake, pass the butter?"
"Please, can you pass the butter?"
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCV.
DECEMBER 21, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—VIII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated in 1906.] In those early days duelling suddenly became a fashion in the new Territory of Nevada, and by 1864 everybody was anxious to have a chance in the new sport, mainly for the reason that he was not able to thoroughly respect himself so long as he had not killed or crippled somebody in a duel or been killed or crippled in one himself.
[Dictated in 1906.] In those early days, dueling suddenly became trendy in the new Territory of Nevada, and by 1864, everyone was eager to try their hand at the new sport, mainly because they couldn't fully respect themselves unless they had either killed or seriously injured someone in a duel or had been killed or seriously injured in one themselves.
At that time I had been serving as city editor on Mr. Goodman's Virginia City "Enterprise" for a matter of two years. I was twenty-nine years old. I was ambitious in several ways, but[Pg 1218] I had entirely escaped the seductions of that particular craze. I had had no desire to fight a duel; I had no intention of provoking one. I did not feel respectable, but I got a certain amount of satisfaction out of feeling safe. I was ashamed of myself; the rest of the staff were ashamed of me—but I got along well enough. I had always been accustomed to feeling ashamed of myself, for one thing or another, so there was no novelty for me in the situation. I bore it very well. Plunkett was on the staff; R. M. Daggett was on the staff. These had tried to get into duels, but for the present had failed, and were waiting. Goodman was the only one of us who had done anything to shed credit upon the paper. The rival paper was the Virginia "Union." Its editor for a little while was Tom Fitch, called the "silver-tongued orator of Wisconsin"—that was where he came from. He tuned up his oratory in the editorial columns of the "Union," and Mr. Goodman invited him out and modified him with a bullet. I remember the joy of the staff when Goodman's challenge was accepted by Fitch. We ran late that night, and made much of Joe Goodman. He was only twenty-four years old; he lacked the wisdom which a person has at twenty-nine, and he was as glad of being it as I was that I wasn't. He chose Major Graves for his second (that name is not right, but it's close enough; I don't remember the Major's name). Graves came over to instruct Joe in the duelling art. He had been a Major under Walker, the "gray-eyed man of destiny," and had fought all through that remarkable man's filibustering campaign in Central America. That fact gauges the Major. To say that a man was a Major under Walker, and came out of that struggle ennobled by Walker's praise, is to say that the Major was not merely a brave man but that he was brave to the very utmost limit of that word. All of Walker's men were like that. I knew the Gillis family intimately. The father made the campaign under Walker, and with him one son. They were in the memorable Plaza fight, and stood it out to the last against overwhelming odds, as did also all of the Walker men. The son was killed at the father's side. The father received a bullet through the eye. The old man—for he was an old man at the time—wore spectacles, and the bullet and one of the glasses went into his skull and remained there. There were some other sons: Steve, George, and Jim, very young chaps—the merest lads—who[Pg 1219] wanted to be in the Walker expedition, for they had their father's dauntless spirit. But Walker wouldn't have them; he said it was a serious expedition, and no place for children.
At that time, I had been the city editor for Mr. Goodman’s Virginia City "Enterprise" for about two years. I was twenty-nine years old. I was ambitious in several ways, but[Pg 1218] I had completely avoided the temptations of that particular craze. I had no desire to fight a duel; I had no intention of starting one. I didn't feel respectable, but I found a certain comfort in feeling safe. I was ashamed of myself; the rest of the staff were ashamed of me—but I got along well enough. I had always been used to feeling ashamed of myself for one reason or another, so there was nothing new about the situation for me. I handled it quite well. Plunkett was on the staff; R. M. Daggett was on the staff. They had tried to get into duels but, for the moment, had failed and were waiting. Goodman was the only one among us who had done something to bring credit to the paper. Our rival was the Virginia "Union." Its editor for a short while was Tom Fitch, known as the "silver-tongued orator of Wisconsin"—that was where he was from. He polished his oratory in the editorial columns of the "Union," and Mr. Goodman invited him out and settled things with a bullet. I remember the staff's excitement when Goodman's challenge was accepted by Fitch. We worked late that night and celebrated Joe Goodman. He was only twenty-four years old; he lacked the wisdom of someone at twenty-nine, and he was as happy about being it as I was glad that I wasn’t. He chose Major Graves as his second (the name isn’t quite right, but it’s close enough; I don’t remember the Major’s name). Graves came over to teach Joe the art of dueling. He had been a Major under Walker, the "gray-eyed man of destiny," and had fought throughout that remarkable man’s filibustering campaign in Central America. That tells you a lot about the Major. Saying a man was a Major under Walker and emerged from that struggle praised by Walker is saying that he was not just brave but extremely brave. All of Walker’s men were like that. I knew the Gillis family well. The father fought under Walker, along with one son. They were in the famous Plaza fight and held their ground until the end against overwhelming odds, just like all of Walker’s men. The son was killed at the father’s side. The father was shot through the eye. The old man—he was pretty old at the time—wore glasses, and the bullet went into his skull, getting lodged there. There were other sons: Steve, George, and Jim, very young kids—barely teenagers—who[Pg 1219] wanted to join the Walker expedition because they had their father’s fearless spirit. But Walker wouldn’t take them; he said it was a serious expedition, not a place for kids.
The Major was a majestic creature, with a most stately and dignified and impressive military bearing, and he was by nature and training courteous, polite, graceful, winning; and he had that quality which I think I have encountered in only one other man—Bob Howland—a mysterious quality which resides in the eye; and when that eye is turned upon an individual or a squad, in warning, that is enough. The man that has that eye doesn't need to go armed; he can move upon an armed desperado and quell him and take him prisoner without saying a single word. I saw Bob Howland do that, once—a slender, good-natured, amiable, gentle, kindly little skeleton of a man, with a sweet blue eye that would win your heart when it smiled upon you, or turn cold and freeze it, according to the nature of the occasion.
The Major was an impressive figure, with a commanding and dignified military presence. He was naturally courteous, polite, graceful, and charming; and he possessed a rare quality I've only seen in one other person—Bob Howland—an enigmatic quality that resides in the eye. When that eye is focused on someone or a group, in warning, it's enough. A man with that kind of eye doesn't need a weapon; he can confront an armed thug and subdue him, capturing him without saying a word. I once saw Bob Howland do that—he was a slender, friendly, gentle little guy, who looked like a kind-hearted skeleton, with a sweet blue eye that could either win you over when he smiled or freeze your heart, depending on the situation.
The Major stood Joe up straight; stood Steve Gillis up fifteen paces away; made Joe turn right side towards Steve, cock his navy six-shooter—that prodigious weapon—and hold it straight down against his leg; told him that that was the correct position for the gun—that the position ordinarily in use at Virginia City (that is to say, the gun straight up in the air, then brought slowly down to your man) was all wrong. At the word "One," you must raise the gun slowly and steadily to the place on the other man's body that you desire to convince. Then, after a pause, "two, three—fire—Stop!" At the word "stop," you may fire—but not earlier. You may give yourself as much time as you please after that word. Then, when you fire, you may advance and go on firing at your leisure and pleasure, if you can get any pleasure out of it. And, in the meantime, the other man, if he has been properly instructed and is alive to his privileges, is advancing on you, and firing—and it is always likely that more or less trouble will result.
The Major stood Joe up straight; positioned Steve Gillis fifteen paces away; instructed Joe to turn to face Steve, aim his navy six-shooter—that impressive weapon—down against his leg; told him that that was the right way to hold the gun—that the usual method used in Virginia City (which means, pointing the gun straight up in the air and then lowering it slowly towards your target) was completely wrong. At the word "One," you must raise the gun slowly and steadily to the spot on the other person's body that you want to aim at. Then, after a pause, "two, three—fire—Stop!" At the word "stop," you can fire—but not before. You can take as much time as you want after that word. Then, when you fire, you may move forward and continue firing at your own pace and enjoyment, if you find any enjoyment in it. Meanwhile, the other man, if he’s been properly trained and is aware of his rights, is moving toward you and firing—and it’s always possible that some trouble will come from it.
Naturally, when Joe's revolver had risen to a level it was pointing at Steve's breast, but the Major said "No, that is not wise. Take all the risks of getting murdered yourself, but don't run any risk of murdering the other man. If you survive a duel you want to survive it in such a way that the memory of it will not linger along with you through the rest of your life and interfere with your sleep. Aim at your man's leg; not at the[Pg 1220] knee, not above the knee; for those are dangerous spots. Aim below the knee; cripple him, but leave the rest of him to his mother."
Naturally, when Joe's gun was raised to point at Steve's chest, the Major said, "No, that's not a good idea. Take all the risks of getting killed yourself, but don't risk killing the other guy. If you get through a duel, make sure you do it in a way that the memory won't haunt you for the rest of your life and mess with your sleep. Aim for his leg; not at the knee, not above the knee; those are dangerous spots. Aim below the knee; injure him, but leave the rest of him to his mother."
By grace of these truly wise and excellent instructions, Joe tumbled Fitch down next morning with a bullet through his lower leg, which furnished him a permanent limp. And Joe lost nothing but a lock of hair, which he could spare better then than he could now. For when I saw him here in New York a year ago, his crop was gone: he had nothing much left but a fringe, with a dome rising above.
Thanks to these really wise and excellent instructions, Joe took Fitch down the next morning with a bullet in his lower leg, leaving him with a permanent limp. And Joe only lost a lock of hair, which he could afford to lose then more than he could now. When I saw him here in New York a year ago, his hair was gone: he had hardly anything left but a fringe, with a bald dome on top.
About a year later I got my chance. But I was not hunting for it. Goodman went off to San Francisco for a week's holiday, and left me to be chief editor. I had supposed that that was an easy berth, there being nothing to do but write one editorial per day; but I was disappointed in that superstition. I couldn't find anything to write an article about, the first day. Then it occurred to me that inasmuch as it was the 22nd of April, 1864, the next morning would be the three-hundredth anniversary of Shakespeare's birthday—and what better theme could I want than that? I got the Cyclopædia and examined it, and found out who Shakespeare was and what he had done, and I borrowed all that and laid it before a community that couldn't have been better prepared for instruction about Shakespeare than if they had been prepared by art. There wasn't enough of what Shakespeare had done to make an editorial of the necessary length, but I filled it out with what he hadn't done—which in many respects was more important and striking and readable than the handsomest things he had really accomplished. But next day I was in trouble again. There were no more Shakespeares to work up. There was nothing in past history, or in the world's future possibilities, to make an editorial out of, suitable to that community; so there was but one theme left. That theme was Mr. Laird, proprietor of the Virginia "Union." His editor had gone off to San Francisco too, and Laird was trying his hand at editing. I woke up Mr. Laird with some courtesies of the kind that were fashionable among newspaper editors in that region, and he came back at me the next day in a most vitriolic way. He was hurt by something I had said about him—some little thing—I don't remember what it was now—probably called him a horse-thief, or one of those little phrases customarily used to[Pg 1221] describe another editor. They were no doubt just, and accurate, but Laird was a very sensitive creature, and he didn't like it. So we expected a challenge from Mr. Laird, because according to the rules—according to the etiquette of duelling as reconstructed and reorganized and improved by the duellists of that region—whenever you said a thing about another person that he didn't like, it wasn't sufficient for him to talk back in the same offensive spirit: etiquette required him to send a challenge; so we waited for a challenge—waited all day. It didn't come. And as the day wore along, hour after hour, and no challenge came, the boys grew depressed. They lost heart. But I was cheerful; I felt better and better all the time. They couldn't understand it, but I could understand it. It was my make that enabled me to be cheerful when other people were despondent. So then it became necessary for us to waive etiquette and challenge Mr. Laird. When we reached that decision, they began to cheer up, but I began to lose some of my animation. However, in enterprises of this kind you are in the hands of your friends; there is nothing for you to do but to abide by what they consider to be the best course. Daggett wrote a challenge for me, for Daggett had the language—the right language—the convincing language—and I lacked it. Daggett poured out a stream of unsavory epithets upon Mr. Laird, charged with a vigor and venom of a strength calculated to persuade him; and Steve Gillis, my second, carried the challenge and came back to wait for the return. It didn't come. The boys were exasperated, but I kept my temper. Steve carried another challenge, hotter than the other, and we waited again. Nothing came of it. I began to feel quite comfortable. I began to take an interest in the challenges myself. I had not felt any before; but it seemed to me that I was accumulating a great and valuable reputation at no expense, and my delight in this grew and grew, as challenge after challenge was declined, until by midnight I was beginning to think that there was nothing in the world so much to be desired as a chance to fight a duel. So I hurried Daggett up; made him keep on sending challenge after challenge. Oh, well, I overdid it; Laird accepted. I might have known that that would happen—Laird was a man you couldn't depend on.
About a year later, I got my chance. But I wasn’t looking for it. Goodman went off to San Francisco for a week’s vacation, leaving me in charge as the chief editor. I thought it would be an easy job since all I had to do was write one editorial each day; but I was disappointed. I couldn’t find anything to write about on the first day. Then it hit me that since it was the 22nd of April, 1864, the next day would be the 300th anniversary of Shakespeare’s birthday—and what better topic could I have? I pulled out the Cyclopædia to check who Shakespeare was and what he had done, and I used that information to enlighten a community that couldn’t have been better prepared to learn about Shakespeare even if they had been trained for it. There wasn’t enough material about Shakespeare’s achievements to fill the necessary editorial length, so I padded it with what he hadn’t done—which in many ways was more significant and interesting and readable than the finest things he actually accomplished. But the next day, I was in trouble again. There were no more Shakespeares to write about. There was nothing in past history or the world’s future possibilities that would work for that community; so there was only one theme left. That theme was Mr. Laird, the owner of the Virginia “Union.” His editor had also gone to San Francisco, and Laird was attempting to take over the editing. I greeted Mr. Laird with some niceties typical among newspaper editors in that area, and he came back at me the next day in an extremely harsh manner. He was upset by something I had said about him—some minor thing—I can’t remember what it was now—probably had called him a horse-thief or used one of those little phrases typically used to [Pg 1221] describe another editor. They were probably fair and accurate, but Laird was a very sensitive guy, and he didn’t take it well. So we anticipated a challenge from Mr. Laird because, according to the rules—the etiquette of dueling as restructured and refined by the duelists in the area—whenever you said something about someone that they didn’t like, it wasn’t enough for them to respond in kind; etiquette required them to send a challenge. So we waited for a challenge—waited all day. It never came. As the day dragged on, hour after hour, and no challenge appeared, the guys grew disheartened. They lost their spirits. But I was in a good mood; I felt better and better as time went on. They couldn’t understand it, but I could. It was my makeup that allowed me to be cheerful when others were feeling down. So it became necessary for us to skip the formalities and challenge Mr. Laird. Once we decided that, they started to perk up, but I began to lose some of my excitement. However, in situations like this, you’re at the mercy of your friends; there’s nothing you can do but follow what they think is the best approach. Daggett wrote a challenge for me since he had the right language—the persuasive language—and I didn’t. Daggett unleashed a stream of unflattering terms at Mr. Laird, charged with enough force and venom to convince him; and Steve Gillis, my second, took the challenge and returned to wait for a response. It didn’t come. The guys were frustrated, but I stayed calm. Steve delivered another challenge, even more intense than the last, and we waited again. Still, nothing came of it. I started to feel quite relaxed. I began to take an interest in the challenges myself. I hadn’t felt anything like it before; but it seemed to me I was building a great and valuable reputation at no cost, and my joy in this grew with each challenge that was turned down, until by midnight, I was convinced there was nothing more desirable than a chance to duel. So I pushed Daggett, making him keep sending challenge after challenge. Oh well, I overdid it; Laird accepted. I should have known that would happen—Laird was a man you couldn’t count on.
The boys were jubilant beyond expression. They helped me make my will, which was another discomfort—and I already had[Pg 1222] enough. Then they took me home. I didn't sleep any—didn't want to sleep. I had plenty of things to think about, and less than four hours to do it in,—because five o'clock was the hour appointed for the tragedy, and I should have to use up one hour—beginning at four—in practising with the revolver and finding out which end of it to level at the adversary. At four we went down into a little gorge, about a mile from town, and borrowed a barn door for a mark—borrowed it of a man who was over in California on a visit—and we set the barn door up and stood a fence-rail up against the middle of it, to represent Mr. Laird. But the rail was no proper representative of him, for he was longer than a rail and thinner. Nothing would ever fetch him but a line shot, and then as like as not he would split the bullet—the worst material for duelling purposes that could be imagined. I began on the rail. I couldn't hit the rail; then I tried the barn door; but I couldn't hit the barn door. There was nobody in danger except stragglers around on the flanks of that mark. I was thoroughly discouraged, and I didn't cheer up any when we presently heard pistol-shots over in the next little ravine. I knew what that was—that was Laird's gang out practising him. They would hear my shots, and of course they would come up over the ridge to see what kind of a record I was making—see what their chances were against me. Well, I hadn't any record; and I knew that if Laird came over that ridge and saw my barn door without a scratch on it, he would be as anxious to fight as I was—or as I had been at midnight, before that disastrous acceptance came.
The boys were ecstatic beyond words. They helped me draft my will, which added to my discomfort—and I already had[Pg 1222] enough to deal with. After that, they took me home. I didn’t sleep at all—I didn't want to. I had a lot on my mind and less than four hours to sort it out—because five o’clock was the scheduled time for the showdown, and I needed to spend an hour—starting at four—practicing with the revolver and figuring out which end to aim at my opponent. At four, we went down into a small gorge about a mile from town and borrowed a barn door for practice—borrowed it from a guy who was away in California on vacation—and we set it up and propped a fence rail against the middle of it to represent Mr. Laird. But the rail was hardly a suitable stand-in for him, as he was longer and thinner than that. Nothing could hit him but a direct shot, and there was a good chance he'd just split the bullet—about the worst possible scenario for a duel. I started with the rail. I couldn’t hit the rail; then I tried the barn door, but I still couldn’t hit it. There was no real danger except for anyone wandering around the edges of that target. I was completely discouraged, and I didn’t feel any better when we soon heard gunshots coming from the next little valley. I knew what that was—Laird’s gang practicing without him. They would hear my shots and, of course, come over the ridge to see what kind of score I was making—check out their chances against me. Well, I had no score to show; and I knew that if Laird came over that ridge and saw my barn door without a single mark on it, he’d be just as eager to fight as I was—or as I had been at midnight, before I made that unfortunate decision.
Now just at this moment, a little bird, no bigger than a sparrow, flew along by and lit on a sage-bush about thirty yards away. Steve whipped out his revolver and shot its head off. Oh, he was a marksman—much better than I was. We ran down there to pick up the bird, and just then, sure enough, Mr. Laird and his people came over the ridge, and they joined us. And when Laird's second saw that bird, with its head shot off, he lost color, he faded, and you could see that he was interested. He said:
Now, at that moment, a little bird, no bigger than a sparrow, flew by and landed on a sagebush about thirty yards away. Steve pulled out his revolver and shot its head off. Oh, he was an incredible marksman—way better than I was. We ran over to grab the bird, and just then, sure enough, Mr. Laird and his group came over the ridge and joined us. When Laird's second saw that bird with its head shot off, he turned pale, lost his color, and you could tell he was interested. He said:
"Who did that?"
"Who did that?"
Before I could answer, Steve spoke up and said quite calmly, and in a matter-of-fact way,
Before I could respond, Steve chimed in, speaking calmly and in a straightforward manner,
"Clemens did it."
"Clemens did it."
[Pg 1223]The second said, "Why, that is wonderful. How far off was that bird?"
[Pg 1223]The second replied, "Wow, that's amazing. How far away was that bird?"
Steve said, "Oh, not far—about thirty yards."
Steve said, "Oh, not far—about thirty feet."
The second said, "Well, that is astonishing shooting. How often can he do that?"
The second replied, "Wow, that's amazing shooting. How often can he pull that off?"
Steve said languidly, "Oh, about four times out of five."
Steve said casually, "Oh, about four out of five times."
I knew the little rascal was lying, but I didn't say anything. The second said, "Why, that is amazing shooting; I supposed he couldn't hit a church."
I knew the little rascal was lying, but I didn't say anything. The second person said, "Wow, that is amazing shooting; I thought he couldn't hit a church."
He was supposing very sagaciously, but I didn't say anything. Well, they said good morning. The second took Mr. Laird home, a little tottery on his legs, and Laird sent back a note in his own hand declining to fight a duel with me on any terms whatever.
He was thinking very wisely, but I didn't say anything. Well, they said good morning. The second person took Mr. Laird home, a bit unsteady on his feet, and Laird sent back a note in his own handwriting saying he wouldn't fight a duel with me under any circumstances.
Well, my life was saved—saved by that accident. I don't know what the bird thought about that interposition of Providence, but I felt very, very comfortable over it—satisfied and content. Now, we found out, later, that Laird had hit his mark four times out of six, right along. If the duel had come off, he would have so filled my skin with bullet-holes that it wouldn't have held my principles.
Well, my life was saved—saved by that accident. I don't know what the bird thought about that intervention of fate, but I felt really, really good about it—satisfied and content. Later, we found out that Laird had hit his target four times out of six, consistently. If the duel had happened, he would have filled me with so many bullet holes that my principles wouldn’t have held up.
By breakfast-time the news was all over town that I had sent a challenge and Steve Gillis had carried it. Now that would entitle us to two years apiece in the penitentiary, according to the brand-new law. Judge North sent us no message as coming from himself, but a message came from a close friend of his. He said it would be a good idea for us to leave the territory by the first stage-coach. This would sail next morning, at four o'clock—and in the meantime we would be searched for, but not with avidity; and if we were in the Territory after that stage-coach left, we would be the first victims of the new law. Judge North was anxious to have some object-lessons for that law, and he would absolutely keep us in the prison the full two years.
By breakfast, word had spread all over town that I had sent a challenge and Steve Gillis had accepted it. This would now mean two years each in prison, thanks to the new law. Judge North didn’t send us a message himself, but a close friend of his did. He suggested it would be wise for us to leave the territory on the first stagecoach. That would leave the next morning at four o'clock—and in the meantime, we would be searched for, but not too eagerly; if we were still in the Territory after that stagecoach left, we would be the first victims of the new law. Judge North was eager to show some examples of that law, and he would definitely keep us in prison for the full two years.
Well, it seemed to me that our society was no longer desirable in Nevada; so we stayed in our quarters and observed proper caution all day—except that once Steve went over to the hotel to attend to another customer of mine. That was a Mr. Cutler. You see Laird was not the only person whom I had tried to reform during my occupancy of the editorial chair. I had looked around and selected several other people, and delivered a new zest of life into them through warm criticism and disapproval—so[Pg 1224] that when I laid down my editorial pen I had four horse-whippings and two duels owing to me. We didn't care for the horse-whippings; there was no glory in them; they were not worth the trouble of collecting. But honor required that some notice should be taken of that other duel. Mr. Cutler had come up from Carson City, and had sent a man over with a challenge from the hotel. Steve went over to pacify him. Steve weighed only ninety-five pounds, but it was well known throughout the territory that with his fists he could whip anybody that walked on two legs, let his weight and science be what they might. Steve was a Gillis, and when a Gillis confronted a man and had a proposition to make, the proposition always contained business. When Cutler found that Steve was my second he cooled down; he became calm and rational, and was ready to listen. Steve gave him fifteen minutes to get out of the hotel, and half an hour to get out of town or there would be results. So that duel went off successfully, because Mr. Cutler immediately left for Carson a convinced and reformed man.
Well, it seemed to me that our society was no longer appealing in Nevada; so we stayed in our quarters and were careful all day—except that once Steve went over to the hotel to take care of another customer of mine. That was Mr. Cutler. You see, Laird wasn’t the only person I had tried to reform during my time as editor. I looked around and picked several other people, trying to inject a new enthusiasm for life into them through constructive criticism and disapproval—so[Pg 1224] by the time I put down my editorial pen, I had four horse-whippings and two duels waiting for me. We didn’t care about the horse-whippings; there was no honor in them; they weren’t worth the effort to collect. But honor required that some action be taken regarding that other duel. Mr. Cutler had come up from Carson City and sent a guy over with a challenge from the hotel. Steve went over to talk him down. Steve only weighed ninety-five pounds, but it was well-known throughout the territory that he could take out anyone with his fists, no matter their size or skill level. Steve was a Gillis, and when a Gillis confronted someone with a proposition, it always meant business. When Cutler realized that Steve was my second, he calmed down; he became reasonable and was ready to listen. Steve gave him fifteen minutes to leave the hotel, and half an hour to get out of town or there would be consequences. So that duel went off successfully, because Mr. Cutler immediately left for Carson as a convinced and reformed man.
I have never had anything to do with duels since. I thoroughly disapprove of duels. I consider them unwise, and I know they are dangerous. Also, sinful. If a man should challenge me now, I would go to that man and take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet retired spot, and kill him.
I haven't been involved in any duels since then. I strongly disapprove of them. I think they're foolish, and I know they're risky. Plus, they're wrong. If someone were to challenge me now, I would approach that person and gently and forgivingly take their hand and lead them to a quiet, private place, and kill them.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
To be continued.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCVI.
JANUARY 4, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—IX.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated December 13, 1906.] As regards the coming American monarchy. It was before the Secretary of State had been heard from that the chairman of the banquet said:
[Dictated December 13, 1906.] About the upcoming American monarchy. Before hearing from the Secretary of State, the banquet chairman said:
"In this time of unrest it is of great satisfaction that such a man as you, Mr. Root, is chief adviser of the President."
"In this time of unrest, it’s very reassuring that someone like you, Mr. Root, is the chief advisor to the President."
Mr. Root then got up and in the most quiet and orderly manner touched off the successor to the San Francisco earthquake. As a result, the several State governments were well shaken up and considerably weakened. Mr. Root was prophesying. He was prophesying, and it seems to me that no shrewder and surer[Pg 2] forecasting has been done in this country for a good many years.
Mr. Root then stood up and, in the most calm and organized way, set off the aftermath of the San Francisco earthquake. As a result, the various State governments were jolted and significantly weakened. Mr. Root was predicting the future. He was predicting, and it seems to me that no wiser and more accurate[Pg 2] predictions have been made in this country for quite some time.
He did not say, in so many words, that we are proceeding, in a steady march, toward eventual and unavoidable replacement of the republic by monarchy; but I suppose he was aware that that is the case. He notes the several steps, the customary steps, which in all the ages have led to the consolidation of loose and scattered governmental forces into formidable centralizations of authority; but he stops there, and doesn't add up the sum. He is not unaware that heretofore the sum has been ultimate monarchy, and that the same figures can fairly be depended upon to furnish the same sum whenever and wherever they can be produced, so long as human nature shall remain as it is; but it was not needful that he do the adding, since any one can do it; neither would it have been gracious in him to do it.
He didn’t outright say that we are steadily moving toward an inevitable transition from a republic to a monarchy, but I think he knew that’s what’s happening. He mentions the various usual steps that throughout history have led to the merging of weak and scattered government powers into strong central authorities; but he stops there and doesn’t add them up. He recognizes that in the past, those steps have ultimately led to monarchy, and that the same factors can reliably produce the same outcome whenever they come into play, as long as human nature remains unchanged. However, it wasn’t necessary for him to do the math, since anyone could do it, and it wouldn’t have been polite for him to point it out.
In observing the changed conditions which in the course of time have made certain and sure the eventual seizure by the Washington government of a number of State duties and prerogatives which have been betrayed and neglected by the several States, he does not attribute those changes and the vast results which are to flow from them to any thought-out policy of any party or of any body of dreamers or schemers, but properly and rightly attributes them to that stupendous power—Circumstance—which moves by laws of its own, regardless of parties and policies, and whose decrees are final, and must be obeyed by all—and will be. The railway is a Circumstance, the steamship is a Circumstance, the telegraph is a Circumstance. They were mere happenings; and to the whole world, the wise and the foolish alike, they were entirely trivial, wholly inconsequential; indeed silly, comical, grotesque. No man, and no party, and no thought-out policy said, "Behold, we will build railways and steamships and telegraphs, and presently you will see the condition and way of life of every man and woman and child in the nation totally changed; unimaginable changes of law and custom will follow, in spite of anything that anybody can do to prevent it."
In looking at the changing conditions that over time have guaranteed the eventual takeover by the Washington government of various State duties and powers that have been neglected and mismanaged by the States, he doesn't blame these changes and the huge consequences from them on any deliberate strategy by any party or group of dreamers or schemers. Instead, he rightly attributes them to the immense power of Circumstance—which operates by its own rules, unaffected by parties and policies, and whose decisions are final and must be accepted by everyone—and they will be. The railway is a Circumstance, the steamship is a Circumstance, the telegraph is a Circumstance. They were just events, and to the entire world, both wise and foolish, they seemed completely trivial, totally inconsequential; in fact, silly, comical, absurd. No individual, no party, and no planned policy proclaimed, "Look, we will build railways and steamships and telegraphs, and soon you will see the lives of every man, woman, and child in the nation completely transformed; unimaginable changes in laws and traditions will occur, no matter what anyone tries to do to stop it."
The changed conditions have come, and Circumstance knows what is following, and will follow. So does Mr. Root. His language is not unclear, it is crystal:
The changed conditions have arrived, and Circumstance is aware of what is coming next, and what will come after that. Mr. Root knows this too. His words are not ambiguous; they are clear as day:
"Our whole life has swung away from the old State centres, and is crystallizing about national centres."
"Our entire lives have shifted away from the old State centers and are coming together around national centers."
[Pg 3]" ... The old barriers which kept the States as separate communities are completely lost from sight."
[Pg 3]" ... The old divisions that kept the states as separate communities have completely disappeared."
" ... That [State] power of regulation and control is gradually passing into the hands of the national government."
"... That [State] power to regulate and control is gradually shifting to the national government."
"Sometimes by an assertion of the inter-State commerce power, sometimes by an assertion of the taxing power, the national government is taking up the performance of duties which under the changed conditions the separate States are no longer capable of adequately performing."
"Sometimes by using its interstate commerce power, and sometimes through its taxing power, the national government is stepping in to manage responsibilities that, under current conditions, the individual states can no longer handle effectively."
"We are urging forward in a development of business and social life which tends more and more to the obliteration of State lines and the decrease of State power as compared with national power."
"We are progressing in the development of business and social life that increasingly tends to erase State boundaries and reduce State power compared to national power."
"It is useless for the advocates of State rights to inveigh against ... the extension of national authority in the fields of necessary control where the States themselves fail in the performance of their duty."
"It’s pointless for supporters of State rights to criticize the growth of national authority in areas that need oversight when the States themselves aren't meeting their responsibilities."
He is not announcing a policy; he is not forecasting what a party of planners will bring about; he is merely telling what the people will require and compel. And he could have added—which would be perfectly true—that the people will not be moved to it by speculation and cogitation and planning, but by Circumstance—that power which arbitrarily compels all their actions, and over which they have not the slightest control.
He isn't making a policy statement; he's not predicting what a planning party will achieve; he's just stating what the people will demand and force. He could have also added—truthfully—that the people won't be motivated by speculation, thought, or planning, but by Circumstance—that power that randomly drives all their actions, and which they have no control over at all.
"The end is not yet."
"The end isn't here yet."
It is a true word. We are on the march, but at present we are only just getting started.
It’s true. We're on the move, but right now, we're just getting started.
If the States continue to fail to do their duty as required by the people—
If the States keep failing to do their job as expected by the people—
" ... constructions of the Constitution will be found to vest the power where it will be exercised—in the national government."
" ... constructions of the Constitution will be found to give the power to where it will be used—in the national government."
I do not know whether that has a sinister meaning or not, and so I will not enlarge upon it lest I should chance to be in the wrong. It sounds like ship-money come again, but it may not be so intended.
I don’t know if that has a dark meaning or not, so I won’t elaborate on it in case I’m mistaken. It sounds like ship money all over again, but it might not be meant that way.
Human nature being what it is, I suppose we must expect to drift into monarchy by and by. It is a saddening thought, but we cannot change our nature: we are all alike, we human beings; and in our blood and bone, and ineradicable, we carry the seeds out of which monarchies and aristocracies are grown: worship of gauds, titles, distinctions, power. We have to worship these things and their possessors, we are all born so, and we cannot help it. We have to be despised by somebody whom we regard as above us,[Pg 4] or we are not happy; we have to have somebody to worship and envy, or we cannot be content. In America we manifest this in all the ancient and customary ways. In public we scoff at titles and hereditary privilege, but privately we hanker after them, and when we get a chance we buy them for cash and a daughter. Sometimes we get a good man and worth the price, but we are ready to take him anyway, whether he be ripe or rotten, whether he be clean and decent, or merely a basket of noble and sacred and long-descended offal. And when we get him the whole nation publicly chaffs and scoffs—and privately envies; and also is proud of the honor which has been conferred upon us. We run over our list of titled purchases every now and then, in the newspapers, and discuss them and caress them, and are thankful and happy.
Human nature being what it is, I guess we have to expect to eventually slide into monarchy. It’s a depressing thought, but we can’t change who we are: we’re all the same, we human beings; and deep down, we carry the seeds that lead to monarchies and aristocracies: the worship of trinkets, titles, distinctions, and power. We have to admire these things and those who own them; we’re all born this way, and there’s nothing we can do about it. We need to be looked down upon by someone we see as above us, or we aren’t happy; we need someone to idolize and envy, or we can’t feel content. In America, we show this in old and familiar ways. Publicly, we mock titles and inherited privilege, but privately, we crave them, and when we get the chance, we buy them with cash and a daughter. Sometimes we end up with a good person worth the price, but we’re willing to settle for anyone, whether they’re good or bad, clean and decent, or just a bunch of noble and sacred and long-descended trash. And when we do get them, the whole nation publicly jokes and ridicules—and privately envies; and also feels proud of the honor that’s been bestowed upon us. We occasionally go through our list of titled purchases in the newspapers, discuss them, and cherish them, feeling thankful and happy.
Like all the other nations, we worship money and the possessors of it—they being our aristocracy, and we have to have one. We like to read about rich people in the papers; the papers know it, and they do their best to keep this appetite liberally fed. They even leave out a football bull-fight now and then to get room for all the particulars of how—according to the display heading—"Rich Woman Fell Down Cellar—Not Hurt." The falling down the cellar is of no interest to us when the woman is not rich, but no rich woman can fall down cellar and we not yearn to know all about it and wish it was us.
Like all other nations, we worship money and those who have it—they're our elite, and we need that. We love reading about wealthy people in the news; the media knows this, so they do their best to satisfy our craving. They even skip a football game now and then to make space for details like, according to the headline, "Rich Woman Fell Down Cellar—Not Hurt." The fall isn’t interesting if the woman isn't wealthy, but when a rich woman takes a tumble, we can’t help but want to know everything and wish it was us.
In a monarchy the people willingly and rejoicingly revere and take pride in their nobilities, and are not humiliated by the reflection that this humble and hearty homage gets no return but contempt. Contempt does not shame them, they are used to it, and they recognize that it is their proper due. We are all made like that. In Europe we easily and quickly learn to take that attitude toward the sovereigns and the aristocracies; moreover, it has been observed that when we get the attitude we go on and exaggerate it, presently becoming more servile than the natives, and vainer of it. The next step is to rail and scoff at republics and democracies. All of which is natural, for we have not ceased to be human beings by becoming Americans, and the human race was always intended to be governed by kingship, not by popular vote.
In a monarchy, people gladly and proudly respect their nobles and aren't embarrassed by the fact that this sincere admiration often receives nothing but disdain in return. They’re used to the contempt; it doesn’t shame them, and they see it as their rightful place. We’re all made that way. In Europe, we quickly learn to adopt this attitude toward rulers and aristocrats; moreover, it’s been noticed that once we settle into this mindset, we tend to take it further, often becoming more submissive than the locals and even prouder of it. The next step is to criticize and mock republics and democracies. This is all natural because we don’t stop being human when we become Americans, and humanity was always meant to be ruled by kings, not by popular vote.
I suppose we must expect that unavoidable and irresistible Circumstances will gradually take away the powers of the States and concentrate them in the central government, and that the republic will then repeat the history of all time and become a monarchy;[Pg 5] but I believe that if we obstruct these encroachments and steadily resist them the monarchy can be postponed for a good while yet.
I guess we have to accept that unavoidable and unstoppable circumstances will eventually diminish the powers of the states and centralize them in the federal government, leading the republic to follow the path of history and become a monarchy;[Pg 5] but I believe that if we push back against these encroachments and consistently resist them, we can delay the monarchy for quite a while longer.
[Dictated December 1, 1906.] An exciting event in our village (Hannibal) was the arrival of the mesmerizer. I think the year was 1850. As to that I am not sure, but I know the month—it was May; that detail has survived the wear of fifty-five years. A pair of connected little incidents of that month have served to keep the memory of it green for me all this time; incidents of no consequence, and not worth embalming, yet my memory has preserved them carefully and flung away things of real value to give them space and make them comfortable. The truth is, a person's memory has no more sense than his conscience, and no appreciation whatever of values and proportions. However, never mind those trifling incidents; my subject is the mesmerizer, now.
[Dictated December 1, 1906.] An exciting event in our village (Hannibal) was the arrival of the mesmerizer. I think it was 1850. I'm not entirely sure of the year, but I remember the month—it was May; that detail has survived the passing of fifty-five years. A couple of connected little events from that month have kept the memory fresh for me all this time; events of no real significance, not worth remembering, yet my memory has hung onto them tightly and tossed aside things of real importance to make room for them. The truth is, a person's memory has no more sense than their conscience and no real sense of value or proportion. Anyway, those trivial events don't matter; my focus is on the mesmerizer now.
He advertised his show, and promised marvels. Admission as usual: 25 cents, children and negroes half price. The village had heard of mesmerism, in a general way, but had not encountered it yet. Not many people attended, the first night, but next day they had so many wonders to tell that everybody's curiosity was fired, and after that for a fortnight the magician had prosperous times. I was fourteen or fifteen years old—the age at which a boy is willing to endure all things, suffer all things, short of death by fire, if thereby he may be conspicuous and show off before the public; and so, when I saw the "subjects" perform their foolish antics on the platform and make the people laugh and shout and admire, I had a burning desire to be a subject myself. Every night, for three nights, I sat in the row of candidates on the platform, and held the magic disk in the palm of my hand, and gazed at it and tried to get sleepy, but it was a failure; I remained wide awake, and had to retire defeated, like the majority. Also, I had to sit there and be gnawed with envy of Hicks, our journeyman; I had to sit there and see him scamper and jump when Simmons the enchanter exclaimed, "See the snake! see the snake!" and hear him say, "My, how beautiful!" in response to the suggestion that he was observing a splendid sunset; and so on—the whole insane business. I couldn't laugh, I couldn't applaud; it filled me with bitterness to have others do it, and to have people make a hero[Pg 6] of Hicks, and crowd around him when the show was over, and ask him for more and more particulars of the wonders he had seen in his visions, and manifest in many ways that they were proud to be acquainted with him. Hicks—the idea! I couldn't stand it; I was getting boiled to death in my own bile.
He promoted his show and promised amazing things. The usual admission was 25 cents, and half price for kids and Black people. The village had heard of mesmerism in a general way but hadn’t experienced it yet. Not many people showed up on the first night, but the next day they had so many stories to share that everyone’s curiosity was piqued, and after that, the magician had a successful run for two weeks. I was around fourteen or fifteen—an age when a boy is willing to go through anything and endure any hardship, except for dying by fire, just to stand out and show off in front of an audience. So, when I watched the "subjects" doing their silly tricks on stage and making people laugh, cheer, and marvel, I desperately wanted to be a subject myself. For three nights, I sat in the line of candidates on stage, held the magic disk in my hand, stared at it, and tried to fall asleep, but it didn’t work; I stayed wide awake and had to leave feeling defeated, like most of the others. Plus, I had to sit there and be filled with envy for Hicks, our apprentice; I had to watch him dash and leap when Simmons the magician shouted, "Look at the snake! Look at the snake!" and hear him exclaim, "Wow, how beautiful!" in response to the suggestion that he was seeing a breathtaking sunset, and so on—the whole ridiculous spectacle. I couldn’t laugh or cheer; it ate me up inside to see others do it, and to watch people make a hero out of Hicks, crowding around him when the show ended, asking for more details about the wonders he had experienced in his visions, and in various ways showing they were proud to know him. Hicks—the thought! I couldn’t take it; I was boiling over with jealousy.
On the fourth night temptation came, and I was not strong enough to resist. When I had gazed at the disk awhile I pretended to be sleepy, and began to nod. Straightway came the professor and made passes over my head and down my body and legs and arms, finishing each pass with a snap of his fingers in the air, to discharge the surplus electricity; then he began to "draw" me with the disk, holding it in his fingers and telling me I could not take my eyes off it, try as I might; so I rose slowly, bent and gazing, and followed that disk all over the place, just as I had seen the others do. Then I was put through the other paces. Upon suggestion I fled from snakes; passed buckets at a fire; became excited over hot steamboat-races; made love to imaginary girls and kissed them; fished from the platform and landed mud-cats that outweighed me—and so on, all the customary marvels. But not in the customary way. I was cautious at first, and watchful, being afraid the professor would discover that I was an impostor and drive me from the platform in disgrace; but as soon as I realized that I was not in danger, I set myself the task of terminating Hicks's usefulness as a subject, and of usurping his place.
On the fourth night, temptation hit, and I wasn't strong enough to resist. After staring at the disk for a while, I pretended to be sleepy and started to nod off. Right away, the professor came in and waved his hands over my head, then down my body, legs, and arms, finishing each motion with a snap of his fingers in the air to release the extra energy. Then he started to "draw" me with the disk, holding it between his fingers and insisting that I couldn't look away no matter how hard I tried. So, I slowly got up, bent forward, and followed that disk around just like I had seen the others do. Then I went through the other routines. On his suggestion, I ran away from snakes, passed buckets at a fire, got excited over hot steamboat races, flirted with imaginary girls and kissed them, fished from the platform, and caught mud cats that were heavier than me—and so on, all the usual wonders. But not in the usual way. I was cautious at first, staying alert, worried that the professor would figure out I was a fraud and throw me off the platform in shame. But as soon as I realized I was safe, I decided to end Hicks's usefulness as a subject and take his place.
It was a sufficiently easy task. Hicks was born honest; I, without that incumbrance—so some people said. Hicks saw what he saw, and reported accordingly; I saw more than was visible, and added to it such details as could help. Hicks had no imagination, I had a double supply. He was born calm, I was born excited. No vision could start a rapture in him, and he was constipated as to language, anyway; but if I saw a vision I emptied the dictionary onto it and lost the remnant of my mind into the bargain.
It was a pretty easy job. Hicks was naturally honest; I, according to some people, didn’t have that burden. Hicks reported exactly what he saw, while I noticed more than what was apparent and added details that could be helpful. Hicks had no imagination; I had plenty. He was born calm, while I was born restless. No vision could elicit excitement in him, and he was always short on words, but if I had a vision, I would spill out the whole dictionary onto it and completely lose myself in the process.
At the end of my first half-hour Hicks was a thing of the past, a fallen hero, a broken idol, and I knew it and was glad, and said in my heart, Success to crime! Hicks could never have been mesmerized to the point where he could kiss an imaginary girl in public, or a real one either, but I was competent. Whatever Hicks had failed in, I made it a point to succeed in,[Pg 7] let the cost be what it might, physically or morally. He had shown several bad defects, and I had made a note of them. For instance, if the magician asked, "What do you see?" and left him to invent a vision for himself, Hicks was dumb and blind, he couldn't see a thing nor say a word, whereas the magician soon found that when it came to seeing visions of a stunning and marketable sort I could get along better without his help than with it. Then there was another thing: Hicks wasn't worth a tallow dip on mute mental suggestion. Whenever Simmons stood behind him and gazed at the back of his skull and tried to drive a mental suggestion into it, Hicks sat with vacant face, and never suspected. If he had been noticing, he could have seen by the rapt faces of the audience that something was going on behind his back that required a response. Inasmuch as I was an impostor I dreaded to have this test put upon me, for I knew the professor would be "willing" me to do something, and as I couldn't know what it was, I should be exposed and denounced. However, when my time came, I took my chance. I perceived by the tense and expectant faces of the people that Simmons was behind me willing me with all his might. I tried my best to imagine what he wanted, but nothing suggested itself. I felt ashamed and miserable, then. I believed that the hour of my disgrace was come, and that in another moment I should go out of that place disgraced. I ought to be ashamed to confess it, but my next thought was, not how I could win the compassion of kindly hearts by going out humbly and in sorrow for my misdoings, but how I could go out most sensationally and spectacularly.
At the end of my first half-hour, Hicks was yesterday's news, a fallen hero, a broken idol, and I realized it and felt glad about it. In my heart, I thought, "Cheers to crime!" Hicks could never have been mesmerized enough to kiss an imaginary girl in public, or even a real one, but I was capable. Whatever Hicks had failed at, I made sure to succeed at, [Pg 7] no matter the cost, physically or morally. He displayed some serious weaknesses, and I made a note of them. For example, if the magician asked, "What do you see?" and left him to create a vision, Hicks was mute and blind; he couldn’t see a thing or say a single word, while the magician quickly realized that when it came to envisioning impressive and marketable ideas, I could manage better without his input. Then there was another issue: Hicks was useless when it came to silent mental suggestion. Whenever Simmons stood behind him, staring at the back of his head and trying to implant a mental suggestion, Hicks sat there with a blank expression, completely unaware. If he had been paying attention, he would have noticed the rapt faces of the audience indicating that something was happening behind him that needed a reaction. Being an impostor, I was terrified of this test, knowing the professor would be trying to will me to do something, and since I couldn’t know what it was, I’d be exposed and humiliated. However, when my moment came, I took my chance. I could tell by the tense and expectant expressions of the crowd that Simmons was behind me, exerting all his effort to will me. I tried hard to guess what he wanted, but nothing came to mind. I felt ashamed and miserable at that moment. I believed my hour of disgrace had arrived, and that soon I would leave that place in shame. I should be embarrassed to admit it, but my next thought was not how to win the sympathy of compassionate hearts by leaving humbly and regretfully, but how I could make a sensational and dramatic exit.
There was a rusty and empty old revolver lying on the table, among the "properties" employed in the performances. On May-day, two or three weeks before, there had been a celebration by the schools, and I had had a quarrel with a big boy who was the school-bully, and I had not come out of it with credit. That boy was now seated in the middle of the house, half-way down the main aisle. I crept stealthily and impressively toward the table, with a dark and murderous scowl on my face, copied from a popular romance, seized the revolver suddenly, flourished it, shouted the bully's name, jumped off the platform, and made a rush for him and chased him out of the house before the paralyzed people could interfere to save him. There was a[Pg 8] storm of applause, and the magician, addressing the house, said, most impressively—
There was a rusty, empty old revolver lying on the table, among the "props" used in the performances. A couple of weeks before May Day, there had been a celebration at the schools, and I had gotten into a fight with a big kid who was the school bully, and I didn't come out of it looking good. That kid was now sitting in the middle of the room, halfway down the main aisle. I crept quietly and dramatically toward the table, with a dark and menacing scowl on my face, inspired by a popular novel, suddenly grabbed the revolver, waved it around, shouted the bully's name, jumped off the platform, and charged at him, chasing him out of the room before the stunned audience could stop me. There was a[Pg 8] roar of applause, and the magician, addressing the audience, said, very dramatically—
"That you may know how really remarkable this is, and how wonderfully developed a subject we have in this boy, I assure you that without a single spoken word to guide him he has carried out what I mentally commanded him to do, to the minutest detail. I could have stopped him at a moment in his vengeful career by a mere exertion of my will, therefore the poor fellow who has escaped was at no time in danger."
"To help you understand how truly amazing this is, and how incredibly advanced this boy is, I can assure you that without saying a single word to him, he has followed my unspoken instructions to the smallest detail. I could have halted him at any point in his path of revenge just by using my will, so the poor guy who got away was never in any real danger."
So I was not in disgrace. I returned to the platform a hero, and happier than I have ever been in this world since. As regards mental suggestion, my fears of it were gone. I judged that in case I failed to guess what the professor might be willing me to do, I could count on putting up something that would answer just as well. I was right, and exhibitions of unspoken suggestion became a favorite with the public. Whenever I perceived that I was being willed to do something I got up and did something—anything that occurred to me—and the magician, not being a fool, always ratified it. When people asked me, "How can you tell what he is willing you to do?" I said, "It's just as easy," and they always said, admiringly, "Well it beats me how you can do it."
So I wasn’t in trouble. I came back to the stage a hero, and happier than I’ve ever been in my life. As for mental suggestion, my worries about it were gone. I figured that if I couldn’t guess what the professor wanted me to do, I could come up with something that would work just as well. I was right, and performances of unspoken suggestion became a hit with the audience. Whenever I sensed that I was being prompted to do something, I just got up and did anything that came to mind—and the magician, being clever, always went along with it. When people asked me, “How can you tell what he wants you to do?” I replied, “It’s pretty easy,” and they would always respond, admiringly, “Well, I can’t believe how you do that.”
Hicks was weak in another detail. When the professor made passes over him and said "his whole body is without sensation now—come forward and test him, ladies and gentlemen," the ladies and gentlemen always complied eagerly, and stuck pins into Hicks, and if they went deep Hicks was sure to wince, then that poor professor would have to explain that Hicks "wasn't sufficiently under the influence." But I didn't wince; I only suffered, and shed tears on the inside. The miseries that a conceited boy will endure to keep up his "reputation"! And so will a conceited man; I know it in my own person, and have seen it in a hundred thousand others. That professor ought to have protected me, and I often hoped he would, when the tests were unusually severe, but he didn't. It may be that he was deceived as well as the others, though I did not believe it nor think it possible. Those were dear good people, but they must have carried simplicity and credulity to the limit. They would stick a pin in my arm and bear on it until they drove it a third of its length in, and then be lost in wonder that by a mere exercise[Pg 9] of will-power the professor could turn my arm to iron and make it insensible to pain. Whereas it was not insensible at all; I was suffering agonies of pain.
Hicks had another weakness. When the professor made passes over him and said, "his whole body is without sensation now—come forward and test him, ladies and gentlemen," the audience always jumped at the chance and poked pins into Hicks. If they pressed hard enough, Hicks would definitely wince, and then that poor professor would have to explain that Hicks "wasn't sufficiently under the influence." But I didn't wince; I just suffered and cried on the inside. The things a proud boy will go through to maintain his "reputation"! And so will a proud man; I've experienced it myself and seen it in countless others. That professor should have protected me, and I often hoped he would, especially when the tests were particularly harsh, but he didn't. He might have been fooled just like the rest, although I didn't believe it or think it was possible. Those were genuinely good people, but they must have taken simplicity and gullibility to the extreme. They would stick a pin in my arm and push it until it was a third of the way in, and then be amazed that, by some exercise[Pg 9] of willpower, the professor could make my arm feel like iron and completely numb to pain. But it wasn't numb at all; I was in excruciating pain.
After that fourth night, that proud night, that triumphant night, I was the only subject. Simmons invited no more candidates to the platform. I performed alone, every night, the rest of the fortnight. In the beginning of the second week I conquered the last doubters. Up to that time a dozen wise old heads, the intellectual aristocracy of the town, had held out, as implacable unbelievers. I was as hurt by this as if I were engaged in some honest occupation. There is nothing surprising about this. Human beings feel dishonor the most, sometimes, when they most deserve it. That handful of overwise old gentlemen kept on shaking their heads all the first week, and saying they had seen no marvels there that could not have been produced by collusion; and they were pretty vain of their unbelief, too, and liked to show it and air it, and be superior to the ignorant and the gullible. Particularly old Dr. Peake, who was the ringleader of the irreconcilables, and very formidable; for he was an F.F.V., he was learned, white-haired and venerable, nobly and richly clad in the fashions of an earlier and a courtlier day, he was large and stately, and he not only seemed wise, but was what he seemed, in that regard. He had great influence, and his opinion upon any matter was worth much more than that of any other person in the community. When I conquered him, at last, I knew I was undisputed master of the field; and now, after more than fifty years, I acknowledge, with a few dry old tears, that I rejoiced without shame.
After that fourth night, that proud night, that triumphant night, I was the only focus. Simmons didn’t invite any more candidates to the stage. I performed solo, every night, for the rest of the two weeks. By the start of the second week, I had won over the last skeptics. Until then, a dozen wise old heads, the intellectual elite of the town, had stubbornly held out as unwavering nonbelievers. I felt as hurt by this as if I were involved in some honest endeavor. There’s nothing surprising about this. People often feel dishonor the most intensely when they least deserve it. That small group of overly wise old men kept shaking their heads during the first week, claiming they saw no wonders that couldn’t have been faked; they were also proud of their disbelief and enjoyed flaunting it, feeling superior to the uninformed and gullible. Especially old Dr. Peake, who led the nonbelievers and was quite intimidating; he was an F.F.V., scholarly, white-haired, and dignified, richly dressed in the styles of a more courtly era. He was large and imposing, and he seemed wise because he truly was. He held significant influence, and his opinion was worth much more than anyone else's in the community. When I finally convinced him, I knew I was the undisputed master of the stage; and now, after more than fifty years, I admit, through a few dry old tears, that I celebrated without any shame.
[Dictated December 2, 1906.] In 1847 we were living in a large white house on the corner of Hill and Main Streets—a house that still stands, but isn't large now, although it hasn't lost a plank; I saw it a year ago and noticed that shrinkage. My father died in it in March of the year mentioned, but our family did not move out of it until some months afterward. Ours was not the only family in the house, there was another—Dr. Grant's. One day Dr. Grant and Dr. Reyburn argued a matter on the street with sword-canes, and Grant was brought home multifariously punctured. Old Dr. Peake calked the leaks, and came every day for a while, to look after him.[Pg 10] The Grants were Virginians, like Peake, and one day when Grant was getting well enough to be on his feet and sit around in the parlor and talk, the conversation fell upon Virginia and old times. I was present, but the group were probably quite unconscious of me, I being only a lad and a negligible quantity. Two of the group—Dr. Peake and Mrs. Crawford, Mrs. Grant's mother—had been of the audience when the Richmond theatre burned down, thirty-six years before, and they talked over the frightful details of that memorable tragedy. These were eye-witnesses, and with their eyes I saw it all with an intolerable vividness: I saw the black smoke rolling and tumbling toward the sky, I saw the flames burst through it and turn red, I heard the shrieks of the despairing, I glimpsed their faces at the windows, caught fitfully through the veiling smoke, I saw them jump to their death, or to mutilation worse than death. The picture is before me yet, and can never fade.
[Dictated December 2, 1906.] In 1847, we lived in a large white house on the corner of Hill and Main Streets—a house that still stands, but isn’t large anymore, even though it hasn’t lost a single plank; I saw it a year ago and noticed how much smaller it felt. My father died in that house in March of the mentioned year, but our family didn’t move out until a few months later. We weren’t the only family in the house; there was another one—Dr. Grant's. One day, Dr. Grant and Dr. Reyburn argued about something in the street using sword-canes, and Grant was brought home with multiple stab wounds. Old Dr. Peake patched him up and visited every day for a while to take care of him.[Pg 10] The Grants were Virginians, just like Peake, and one day when Grant was well enough to be on his feet and hang out in the parlor to chat, the conversation turned to Virginia and the old days. I was there, but the group probably didn’t notice me since I was just a kid and not very important. Two people in the group—Dr. Peake and Mrs. Crawford, Mrs. Grant’s mother—had witnessed the Richmond theater fire thirty-six years earlier, and they discussed the terrifying details of that tragic event. They were eyewitnesses, and through their eyes, I saw it all with excruciating clarity: I saw the black smoke rolling and rising into the sky, I saw the flames break through and turn bright red, I heard the screams of the desperate, I caught glimpses of their faces at the windows, momentarily visible through the thick smoke, I saw them jump to their deaths or to injuries worse than death. That image is still vivid in my mind and will never fade.
In due course they talked of the colonial mansion of the Peakes, with its stately columns and its spacious grounds, and by odds and ends I picked up a clearly defined idea of the place. I was strongly interested, for I had not before heard of such palatial things from the lips of people who had seen them with their own eyes. One detail, casually dropped, hit my imagination hard. In the wall, by the great front door, there was a round hole as big as a saucer—a British cannon-ball had made it, in the war of the Revolution. It was breath-taking; it made history real; history had never been real to me before.
Soon they began discussing the Peake’s colonial mansion, with its grand columns and large grounds, and through bits and pieces of their conversation, I gathered a clear image of the place. I was really intrigued because I had never heard such lavish descriptions from people who had actually seen them. One detail, mentioned in passing, struck me hard. There was a round hole in the wall by the large front door, as big as a saucer—a British cannonball had created it during the Revolutionary War. It was stunning; it made history feel tangible; history had never felt real to me before.
Very well, three or four years later, as already mentioned, I was king-bee and sole "subject" in the mesmeric show; it was the beginning of the second week; the performance was half over; just then the majestic Dr. Peake, with his ruffled bosom and wristbands and his gold-headed cane, entered, and a deferential citizen vacated his seat beside the Grants and made the great chief take it. This happened while I was trying to invent something fresh in the way of a vision, in response to the professor's remark—
Very well, three or four years later, as I already mentioned, I was the main attraction and the only "subject" in the mesmerism show; it was the start of the second week, and the performance was halfway through. Just then, the impressive Dr. Peake, with his ruffled shirtfront and cuffs and his gold-headed cane, walked in, and a respectful audience member got up from his seat next to the Grants to let the great man have it. This was happening while I was trying to come up with something new for a vision in response to the professor's comment—
"Concentrate your powers. Look—look attentively. There—don't you see something? Concentrate—concentrate. Now then—describe it."
"Focus your energy. Look—look closely. There—don’t you see something? Focus—focus. Now, describe it."
Without suspecting it, Dr. Peake, by entering the place, had reminded me of the talk of three years before. He had also[Pg 11] furnished me capital and was become my confederate, an accomplice in my frauds. I began on a vision, a vague and dim one (that was part of the game at the beginning of a vision; it isn't best to see it too clearly at first, it might look as if you had come loaded with it). The vision developed, by degrees, and gathered swing, momentum, energy. It was the Richmond fire. Dr. Peake was cold, at first, and his fine face had a trace of polite scorn in it; but when he began to recognize that fire, that expression changed, and his eyes began to light up. As soon as I saw that, I threw the valves wide open and turned on all the steam, and gave those people a supper of fire and horrors that was calculated to last them one while! They couldn't gasp, when I got through—they were petrified. Dr. Peake had risen, and was standing,—and breathing hard. He said, in a great voice—
Without realizing it, Dr. Peake, by entering the room, reminded me of our conversation from three years ago. He had also[Pg 11] provided me with funds and had become my partner, an accomplice in my deceptions. I began with a vision, a vague and unclear one (that’s part of the deal at the start of a vision; it’s better not to see it too clearly at first, or it might seem like you came fully prepared). The vision gradually developed and gained momentum and energy. It was the Richmond fire. Dr. Peake was initially cold, his handsome face showing a hint of polite disdain; but when he started to recognize that fire, his expression changed, and his eyes began to light up. As soon as I noticed that, I opened the floodgates and put everything I had into it, providing those people with a feast of fire and nightmares that would stay with them for a long time! They were speechless when I finished—they were frozen in shock. Dr. Peake had gotten up and was standing there, breathing heavily. He said, in a booming voice—
"My doubts are ended. No collusion could produce that miracle. It was totally impossible for him to know those details, yet he has described them with the clarity of an eye-witness—and with what unassailable truthfulness God knows I know!"
"My doubts are gone. No cheating could create that miracle. It was completely impossible for him to know those details, yet he has described them with the clarity of an eyewitness—and with a truthfulness that, believe me, I know is undeniable!"
I saved the colonial mansion for the last night, and solidified and perpetuated Dr. Peake's conversion with the cannon-ball hole. He explained to the house that I could never have heard of that small detail, which differentiated this mansion from all other Virginian mansions and perfectly identified it, therefore the fact stood proven that I had seen it in my vision. Lawks!
I saved the colonial mansion for the last night and confirmed Dr. Peake's transformation with the cannonball hole. He explained to the house that I could never have known about that small detail, which set this mansion apart from all other Virginia mansions and made it uniquely identifiable. Therefore, it proved that I had seen it in my vision. Wow!
It is curious. When the magician's engagement closed there was but one person in the village who did not believe in mesmerism, and I was the one. All the others were converted, but I was to remain an implacable and unpersuadable disbeliever in mesmerism and hypnotism for close upon fifty years. This was because I never would examine them, in after life. I couldn't. The subject revolted me. Perhaps because it brought back to me a passage in my life which for pride's sake I wished to forget; though I thought—or persuaded myself I thought—I should never come across a "proof" which wasn't thin and cheap, and probably had a fraud like me behind it.
It's interesting. When the magician's show ended, there was only one person in the village who didn't believe in mesmerism, and that was me. Everyone else was convinced, but I remained a stubborn and unchangeable skeptic about mesmerism and hypnotism for nearly fifty years. This was because I never wanted to examine them later in life. I couldn't. The topic disgusted me. Maybe it was because it reminded me of a time in my life that I wanted to forget for the sake of my pride; although I thought—or convinced myself—I would never find a "proof" that wasn't flimsy and cheap, likely backed by a fraud like myself.
The truth is, I did not have to wait long to get tired of my triumphs. Not thirty days, I think. The glory which is built upon a lie soon becomes a most unpleasant incumbrance. No[Pg 12] doubt for a while I enjoyed having my exploits told and retold and told again in my presence and wondered over and exclaimed about, but I quite distinctly remember that there presently came a time when the subject was wearisome and odious to me and I could not endure the disgusting discomfort of it. I am well aware that the world-glorified doer of a deed of great and real splendor has just my experience; I know that he deliciously enjoys hearing about it for three or four weeks, and that pretty soon after that he begins to dread the mention of it, and by and by wishes he had been with the damned before he ever thought of doing that deed; I remember how General Sherman used to rage and swear over "When we were Marching through Georgia," which was played at him and sung at him everywhere he went; still, I think I suffered a shade more than the legitimate hero does, he being privileged to soften his misery with the reflection that his glory was at any rate golden and reproachless in its origin, whereas I had no such privilege, there being no possible way to make mine respectable.
Honestly, I didn’t have to wait long to get tired of my successes. It wasn’t even thirty days, I think. The glory built on a lie quickly becomes a heavy burden. No[Pg 12] doubt for a while I enjoyed hearing my achievements recounted and praised, but I clearly remember a point when it became tedious and unbearable, and I couldn’t stand the uncomfortable feeling anymore. I know that someone celebrated for a genuine act of greatness experiences this too; I know they enjoy the attention for three or four weeks, but soon after, they start to dread its mention and eventually wish they had never done that act at all. I recall how General Sherman would get furious every time “When We Were Marching Through Georgia” was played or sung to him wherever he went. Still, I think I suffered a bit more than the true hero does, as he can at least find some comfort in knowing that his glory is genuinely deserved and without shame, while I had no way to make mine respectable.
How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again! Thirty-five years after those evil exploits of mine I visited my old mother, whom I had not seen for ten years; and being moved by what seemed to me a rather noble and perhaps heroic impulse, I thought I would humble myself and confess my ancient fault. It cost me a great effort to make up my mind; I dreaded the sorrow that would rise in her face, and the shame that would look out of her eyes; but after long and troubled reflection, the sacrifice seemed due and right, and I gathered my resolution together and made the confession.
How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to take that back! Thirty-five years after those terrible things I did, I went to visit my old mother, whom I hadn’t seen in ten years. Driven by what I thought was a noble and maybe even heroic impulse, I decided to humble myself and confess my past mistake. It took a lot of effort to come to that decision; I dreaded the pain that would show on her face and the shame that would reflect in her eyes. But after a lot of anxious thought, I felt that the sacrifice was necessary and right, so I gathered my courage and made the confession.
To my astonishment there were no sentimentalities, no dramatics, no George Washington effects; she was not moved in the least degree; she simply did not believe me, and said so! I was not merely disappointed, I was nettled, to have my costly truthfulness flung out of the market in this placid and confident way when I was expecting to get a profit out of it. I asserted, and reasserted, with rising heat, my statement that every single thing I had done on those long-vanished nights was a lie and a swindle; and when she shook her head tranquilly and said she knew better, I put up my hand and swore to it—adding a triumphant "Now what do you say?"
To my surprise, there was no sentimentality, no drama, no grandstanding; she was completely unfazed; she just didn't believe me and said so! I was not just disappointed, I was annoyed to have my valuable honesty dismissed so casually when I was expecting to gain something from it. I insisted, and kept insisting, with increasing frustration, that everything I had done on those long-gone nights was a lie and a scam; and when she calmly shook her head and said she knew better, I raised my hand and swore it—adding a triumphant "So what do you have to say now?"
It did not affect her at all; it did not budge her the fraction[Pg 13] of an inch from her position. If this was hard for me to endure, it did not begin with the blister she put upon the raw when she began to put my sworn oath out of court with arguments to prove that I was under a delusion and did not know what I was talking about. Arguments! Arguments to show that a person on a man's outside can know better what is on his inside than he does himself! I had cherished some contempt for arguments before, I have not enlarged my respect for them since. She refused to believe that I had invented my visions myself; she said it was folly: that I was only a child at the time and could not have done it. She cited the Richmond fire and the colonial mansion and said they were quite beyond my capacities. Then I saw my chance! I said she was right—I didn't invent those, I got them from Dr. Peake. Even this great shot did no damage. She said Dr. Peake's evidence was better than mine, and he had said in plain words that it was impossible for me to have heard about those things. Dear, dear, what a grotesque and unthinkable situation: a confessed swindler convicted of honesty and condemned to acquittal by circumstantial evidence furnished by the swindled!
It didn’t affect her at all; it didn’t move her even a little from her position. If this was tough for me to bear, it didn’t start with the hurt she caused when she tried to dismiss my sworn oath by using arguments to prove that I was delusional and didn’t know what I was talking about. Arguments! Arguments to suggest that someone could know better what's happening inside a man than he does himself! I had some disdain for arguments before, and I haven’t grown to respect them any more since. She refused to accept that I had created my visions; she called it nonsense: that I was just a kid at the time and couldn’t have done it. She brought up the Richmond fire and the colonial mansion and said they were way beyond my capabilities. Then I saw my opportunity! I said she was right—I didn’t make those up, I got them from Dr. Peake. Even this big move didn’t have any impact. She said Dr. Peake’s testimony was more credible than mine, and he had clearly stated that it was impossible for me to have heard about those things. Oh dear, what a bizarre and unbelievable situation: a confessed fraud found guilty of honesty and condemned to be exonerated by circumstantial evidence provided by the scammed!
I realised, with shame and with impotent vexation, that I was defeated all along the line. I had but one card left, but it was a formidable one. I played it—and stood from under. It seemed ignoble to demolish her fortress, after she had defended it so valiantly; but the defeated know not mercy. I played that matter card. It was the pin-sticking. I said, solemnly—
I realized, with shame and frustration, that I was completely beaten. I had only one move left, but it was a powerful one. I made my move—and braced myself. It felt wrong to tear down her stronghold after she had fought so bravely; but those who are defeated show no mercy. I went with that move. It was the final blow. I said, seriously—
"I give you my honor, a pin was never stuck into me without causing me cruel pain."
"I promise you, a pin has never been stuck into me without causing me intense pain."
She only said—
She just said—
"It is thirty-five years. I believe you do think that, now, but I was there, and I know better. You never winced."
"It’s been thirty-five years. I think you believe that, now, but I was there, and I know better. You never flinched."
She was so calm! and I was so far from it, so nearly frantic.
She was so calm! and I was so far from it, almost frantic.
"Oh, my goodness!" I said, "let me show you that I am speaking the truth. Here is my arm; drive a pin into it—drive it to the head—I shall not wince."
"Oh my gosh!" I said, "let me prove to you that I'm telling the truth. Here’s my arm; stick a pin into it—push it all the way in—I won’t flinch."
She only shook her gray head and said, with simplicity and conviction—
She just shook her gray head and said, with a straightforwardness and certainty—
"You are a man, now, and could dissemble the hurt; but you were only a child then, and could not have done it."
"You’re a man now and could hide the pain; but you were just a kid back then and couldn’t have done that."
[Pg 14]And so the lie which I played upon her in my youth remained with her as an unchallengeable truth to the day of her death. Carlyle said "a lie cannot live." It shows that he did not know how to tell them. If I had taken out a life policy on this one the premiums would have bankrupted me ages ago.
[Pg 14]And so the lie I told her when I was young stayed with her as an undeniable truth until the day she died. Carlyle said, "a lie cannot live." Clearly, he didn't know how to tell them. If I had taken out a life insurance policy on this one, the premiums would have bankrupted me long ago.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCVII.
JANUARY 18, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—X.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated March 28, 1906.] Orion Clemens was born in Jamestown, Fentress County, Tennessee, in 1825. He was the family's first-born, and antedated me ten years. Between him and me came a sister, Margaret, who died, aged ten, in 1837, in that village of Florida, Missouri, where I was born; and Pamela, mother of Samuel E. Moffett, who was an invalid all her life and died in the neighborhood of New York a year ago, aged about seventy-five. Her character was without blemish, and she was of a most kindly and gentle dis[Pg 114]position. Also there was a brother, Benjamin, who died in 1848 aged ten or twelve.
[Dictated March 28, 1906.] Orion Clemens was born in Jamestown, Fentress County, Tennessee, in 1825. He was the firstborn in the family and was ten years older than me. Between him and me was a sister, Margaret, who died at the age of ten in 1837 in the village of Florida, Missouri, where I was born; and Pamela, mother of Samuel E. Moffett, who was disabled her whole life and passed away in the New York area a year ago at around seventy-five. She had an impeccable character and was very kind and gentle. There was also a brother, Benjamin, who died in 1848 at the age of ten or twelve.
Orion's boyhood was spent in that wee little log hamlet of Jamestown up there among the "knobs"—so called—of East Tennessee. The family migrated to Florida, Missouri, then moved to Hannibal, Missouri, when Orion was twelve and a half years old. When he was fifteen or sixteen he was sent to St. Louis and there he learned the printer's trade. One of his characteristics was eagerness. He woke with an eagerness about some matter or other every morning; it consumed him all day; it perished in the night and he was on fire with a fresh new interest next morning before he could get his clothes on. He exploited in this way three hundred and sixty-five red-hot new eagernesses every year of his life. But I am forgetting another characteristic, a very pronounced one. That was his deep glooms, his despondencies, his despairs; these had their place in each and every day along with the eagernesses. Thus his day was divided—no, not divided, mottled—from sunrise to midnight with alternating brilliant sunshine and black cloud. Every day he was the most joyous and hopeful man that ever was, I think, and also every day he was the most miserable man that ever was.
Orion spent his childhood in the tiny log village of Jamestown nestled among the "knobs" of East Tennessee. His family moved to Florida, Missouri, and then to Hannibal, Missouri, when Orion was twelve and a half. When he was around fifteen or sixteen, he was sent to St. Louis, where he learned the printing trade. One of his defining traits was his eagerness. He woke up every morning excited about something, and that enthusiasm fueled him all day. By night, it faded away, but he woke up bursting with a new interest each morning before he even got dressed. This way, he experienced three hundred and sixty-five intense new passions every year of his life. But I almost forgot another significant trait—his deep sadness, his moments of despair, and his struggles with gloom; these were present every day alongside his eagerness. So, his days weren’t just divided but rather a patchwork of bright sunshine and dark clouds from sunrise to midnight. Each day, he was the most cheerful and hopeful person I think there ever was, and also, every day, he was the most miserable person that ever lived.
While he was in his apprenticeship in St. Louis, he got well acquainted with Edward Bates, who was afterwards in Mr. Lincoln's first cabinet. Bates was a very fine man, an honorable and upright man, and a distinguished lawyer. He patiently allowed Orion to bring to him each new project; he discussed it with him and extinguished it by argument and irresistible logic—at first. But after a few weeks he found that this labor was not necessary; that he could leave the new project alone and it would extinguish itself the same night. Orion thought he would like to become a lawyer. Mr. Bates encouraged him, and he studied law nearly a week, then of course laid it aside to try something new. He wanted to become an orator. Mr. Bates gave him lessons. Mr. Bates walked the floor reading from an English book aloud and rapidly turning the English into French, and he recommended this exercise to Orion. But as Orion knew no French, he took up that study and wrought at it like a volcano for two or three days; then gave it up. During his apprenticeship in St. Louis he joined a number of churches, one after another, and taught in their Sunday-schools—changing his[Pg 115] Sunday-school every time he changed his religion. He was correspondingly erratic in his politics—Whig to-day, Democrat next week, and anything fresh that he could find in the political market the week after. I may remark here that throughout his long life he was always trading religions and enjoying the change of scenery. I will also remark that his sincerity was never doubted; his truthfulness was never doubted; and in matters of business and money his honesty was never questioned. Notwithstanding his forever-recurring caprices and changes, his principles were high, always high, and absolutely unshakable. He was the strangest compound that ever got mixed in a human mould. Such a person as that is given to acting upon impulse and without reflection; that was Orion's way. Everything he did he did with conviction and enthusiasm and with a vainglorious pride in the thing he was doing—and no matter what that thing was, whether good, bad or indifferent, he repented of it every time in sackcloth and ashes before twenty-four hours had sped. Pessimists are born, not made. Optimists are born, not made. But I think he was the only person I have ever known in whom pessimism and optimism were lodged in exactly equal proportions. Except in the matter of grounded principle, he was as unstable as water. You could dash his spirits with a single word; you could raise them into the sky again with another one. You could break his heart with a word of disapproval; you could make him as happy as an angel with a word of approval. And there was no occasion to put any sense or any vestige of mentality of any kind into these miracles; anything you might say would answer.
While he was doing his apprenticeship in St. Louis, he got to know Edward Bates well, who later became part of Mr. Lincoln's first cabinet. Bates was a really good man—honorable, upstanding, and a distinguished lawyer. He patiently let Orion bring each new idea to him; he would discuss it and shut it down with arguments and solid logic—at first. But after a few weeks, he realized that this effort wasn’t needed; he could just ignore the new idea, and it would falter by itself that same night. Orion thought he wanted to be a lawyer. Mr. Bates encouraged him, and he studied law for about a week, then, of course, abandoned it to pursue something else. He wanted to become an orator. Mr. Bates gave him lessons. Mr. Bates would pace around reciting from an English book, quickly translating it into French, and recommended this practice to Orion. But since Orion didn’t know any French, he started studying it with a fierce intensity for a few days, then gave it up. During his apprenticeship in St. Louis, he joined several churches, one after the other, and taught in their Sunday schools—switching his Sunday school every time he changed his religion. His politics were just as inconsistent—Whig one day, Democrat the next week, and whatever new trend he found in the political scene the week after. I should note that throughout his long life, he was always swapping religions and enjoying the change of pace. I’ll also point out that his sincerity was never questioned, his truthfulness was never doubted, and in business and financial matters, his honesty was beyond reproach. Despite his constant whims and shifts, his principles were high, always high, and completely unshakeable. He was the strangest mix that ever came together in a human form. Someone like him tends to act on impulse without thinking; that was Orion's way. Everything he did, he did with conviction and enthusiasm, filled with a boastful pride in whatever he was doing—and no matter what it was, whether good, bad, or neutral, he regretted it every single time within twenty-four hours. Pessimists are born, not made. Optimists are born, not made. But I think he was the only person I’ve ever met who had pessimism and optimism in exactly equal measure. Aside from his established principles, he was as unstable as water. A single word could crush his spirits; another could lift them sky-high again. You could break his heart with a word of disapproval; you could make him as happy as an angel with a word of approval. And there was no need to apply any logic or reasoning to these wonders; anything you said would work.
He had another conspicuous characteristic, and it was the father of those which I have just spoken of. This was an intense lust for approval. He was so eager to be approved, so girlishly anxious to be approved by anybody and everybody, without discrimination, that he was commonly ready to forsake his notions, opinions and convictions at a moment's notice in order to get the approval of any person who disagreed with them. I wish to be understood as reserving his fundamental principles all the time. He never forsook those to please anybody. Born and reared among slaves and slaveholders, he was yet an abolitionist from his boyhood to his death. He was always truthful; he was always sincere; he was always honest and honorable. But in[Pg 116] light matters—matters of small consequence, like religion and politics and such things—he never acquired a conviction that could survive a disapproving remark from a cat.
He had another noticeable trait, which was the root of those I just mentioned. It was an intense desire for approval. He was so eager to be liked, so desperately anxious to gain approval from anyone and everyone, without exception, that he was often willing to abandon his ideas, opinions, and beliefs at a moment's notice just to get the approval of anyone who disagreed with him. I want to clarify that he always held on to his core principles. He never surrendered those to please anyone. Raised among slaves and slaveowners, he was an abolitionist from his youth until his death. He was always truthful; he was always sincere; he was always honest and honorable. However, in[Pg 116] trivial matters—issues of little importance, like religion and politics—he never developed a conviction that could withstand a disapproving comment from anyone.
He was always dreaming; he was a dreamer from birth, and this characteristic got him into trouble now and then.
He was always daydreaming; he was a dreamer from the start, and this trait occasionally got him into trouble.
Once when he was twenty-three or twenty-four years old, and was become a journeyman, he conceived the romantic idea of coming to Hannibal without giving us notice, in order that he might furnish to the family a pleasant surprise. If he had given notice, he would have been informed that we had changed our residence and that that gruff old bass-voiced sailorman, Dr. G., our family physician, was living in the house which we had formerly occupied and that Orion's former room in that house was now occupied by Dr. G.'s two middle-aged maiden sisters. Orion arrived at Hannibal per steamboat in the middle of the night, and started with his customary eagerness on his excursion, his mind all on fire with his romantic project and building and enjoying his surprise in advance. He was always enjoying things in advance; it was the make of him. He never could wait for the event, but must build it out of dream-stuff and enjoy it beforehand—consequently sometimes when the event happened he saw that it was not as good as the one he had invented in his imagination, and so he had lost profit by not keeping the imaginary one and letting the reality go.
Once, when he was around twenty-three or twenty-four years old and had become a journeyman, he came up with the romantic idea of arriving in Hannibal without informing us, so he could surprise the family. If he had given us a heads-up, he would have found out that we had moved, and that the gruff old bass-voiced sailor, Dr. G., our family doctor, was living in the house we used to occupy, and that Orion's old room was now taken by Dr. G.'s two middle-aged unmarried sisters. Orion got to Hannibal by steamboat in the middle of the night and set off with his usual enthusiasm, his mind buzzing with his romantic plan, excitedly imagining and anticipating the surprise. He always enjoyed things in advance; it was just how he was. He could never wait for the actual event—he had to create it out of dreams and savor it beforehand. As a result, sometimes when the real event occurred, he found it wasn't as great as the one he had imagined, and he missed out by not holding onto the imaginary version while letting reality slip away.
When he arrived at the house he went around to the back door and slipped off his boots and crept up-stairs and arrived at the room of those elderly ladies without having wakened any sleepers. He undressed in the dark and got into bed and snuggled up against somebody. He was a little surprised, but not much—for he thought it was our brother Ben. It was winter, and the bed was comfortable, and the supposed Ben added to the comfort—and so he was dropping off to sleep very well satisfied with his progress so far and full of happy dreams of what was going to happen in the morning. But something else was going to happen sooner than that, and it happened now. The maid that was being crowded fumed and fretted and struggled and presently came to a half-waking condition and protested against the crowding. That voice paralyzed Orion. He couldn't move a limb; he couldn't get his breath; and the crowded one discovered his new whiskers and began to scream. This removed the paralysis,[Pg 117] and Orion was out of bed and clawing round in the dark for his clothes in a fraction of a second. Both maids began to scream then, so Orion did not wait to get his whole wardrobe. He started with such parts of it as he could grab. He flew to the head of the stairs and started down, and was paralyzed again at that point, because he saw the faint yellow flame of a candle soaring up the stairs from below and he judged that Dr. G. was behind it, and he was. He had no clothes on to speak of, but no matter, he was well enough fixed for an occasion like this, because he had a butcher-knife in his hand. Orion shouted to him, and this saved his life, for the Doctor recognized his voice. Then in those deep-sea-going bass tones of his that I used to admire so much when I was a little boy, he explained to Orion the change that had been made, told him where to find the Clemens family, and closed with some quite unnecessary advice about posting himself before he undertook another adventure like that—advice which Orion probably never needed again as long as he lived.
When he got to the house, he went around to the back door, took off his boots, and quietly crept upstairs to the room of the elderly ladies without waking anyone. He undressed in the dark and climbed into bed, snuggling up against someone. He was a bit surprised but not overly so, thinking it was his brother Ben. It was winter, and the bed was cozy, and the person he thought was Ben made it even more comfortable—he started drifting off to sleep, feeling satisfied with how things were going and dreaming happily about what was going to happen in the morning. But something else was about to happen sooner than that, and it happened right then. The maid he was crowding got agitated, struggled, and eventually half-woke up to protest the closeness. That voice paralyzed Orion. He couldn't move a muscle or catch his breath, and the maid discovered his new whiskers and began to scream. This broke the paralysis, and in an instant, Orion was out of bed, scrambling around in the dark for his clothes. Both maids screamed then, so Orion didn't wait to put on everything. He grabbed what he could and raced to the head of the stairs, where he froze again, seeing the faint yellow flame of a candle rising up the stairs from below, realizing Dr. G. was behind it, and he was. He had barely any clothes on, but it didn’t matter; he was ready for the moment because he had a butcher knife in his hand. Orion shouted to him, and that saved his life, as the Doctor recognized his voice. Then, in those deep bass tones I used to admire as a kid, he explained the changes that had been made, told Orion where to find the Clemens family, and finished with some unnecessary advice about being careful before going on another adventure like that—advice Orion probably never needed again for the rest of his life.
One bitter December night, Orion sat up reading until three o'clock in the morning and then, without looking at a clock, sallied forth to call on a young lady. He hammered and hammered at the door; couldn't get any response; didn't understand it. Anybody else would have regarded that as an indication of some kind or other and would have drawn inferences and gone home. But Orion didn't draw inferences, he merely hammered and hammered, and finally the father of the girl appeared at the door in a dressing-gown. He had a candle in his hand and the dressing-gown was all the clothing he had on—except an expression of unwelcome which was so thick and so large that it extended all down his front to his instep and nearly obliterated the dressing-gown. But Orion didn't notice that this was an unpleasant expression. He merely walked in. The old gentleman took him into the parlor, set the candle on a table, and stood. Orion made the usual remarks about the weather, and sat down—sat down and talked and talked and went on talking—that old man looking at him vindictively and waiting for his chance—waiting treacherously and malignantly for his chance. Orion had not asked for the young lady. It was not customary. It was understood that a young fellow came to see the girl of the house, not the founder of it. At last Orion got up and made[Pg 118] some remark to the effect that probably the young lady was busy and he would go now and call again. That was the old man's chance, and he said with fervency "Why good land, aren't you going to stop to breakfast?"
One cold December night, Orion sat up reading until three in the morning and then, without checking the time, headed out to visit a young lady. He knocked and knocked on the door; no one answered; he couldn't figure it out. Anyone else would have taken that as a sign of some sort, made assumptions, and gone home. But Orion didn’t make assumptions; he just kept knocking, and eventually, the girl's father appeared at the door in a bathrobe. He had a candle in his hand and was only wearing the bathrobe—along with a look of annoyance that was so strong it practically covered him from head to toe. But Orion didn’t notice that the expression was unfriendly. He just walked in. The old man brought him into the living room, set the candle on a table, and stood there. Orion made some small talk about the weather and took a seat—he sat down and talked and talked, while the old man glared at him, waiting for his moment—waiting slyly and spitefully for his moment. Orion hadn’t asked to see the young lady; that wasn't the custom. It was understood that a young man came to see the girl of the house, not the head of it. Finally, Orion got up and remarked that the young lady was probably busy, so he would head out and come back another time. That was the old man’s opportunity, and he said eagerly, "Well, aren’t you going to stay for breakfast?"
Orion did not come to Hannibal until two or three years after my father's death. Meantime he remained in St Louis. He was a journeyman printer and earning wages. Out of his wage he supported my mother and my brother Henry, who was two years younger than I. My sister Pamela helped in this support by taking piano pupils. Thus we got along, but it was pretty hard sledding. I was not one of the burdens, because I was taken from school at once, upon my father's death, and placed in the office of the Hannibal "Courier," as printer's apprentice, and Mr. S., the editor and proprietor of the paper, allowed me the usual emolument of the office of apprentice—that is to say board and clothes, but no money. The clothes consisted of two suits a year, but one of the suits always failed to materialize and the other suit was not purchased so long as Mr. S.'s old clothes held out. I was only about half as big as Mr. S., consequently his shirts gave me the uncomfortable sense of living in a circus tent, and I had to turn up his pants to my ears to make them short enough.
Orion didn't come to Hannibal until two or three years after my father's death. Meanwhile, he stayed in St. Louis. He was a journeyman printer earning a wage. From his pay, he supported my mother and my brother Henry, who was two years younger than I. My sister Pamela contributed by teaching piano lessons. So we managed, but it was tough. I didn’t add to the burden because I was pulled out of school right after my father's death and sent to work as a printer’s apprentice at the Hannibal "Courier." Mr. S., the editor and owner of the paper, provided me with the usual apprentice benefits—that is, room and board, but no pay. The clothes I received consisted of two suits a year, but one suit rarely showed up, and the other wasn’t bought until Mr. S.’s old clothes wore out. I was only about half the size of Mr. S., so his shirts felt like I was in a circus tent, and I had to roll up his pants to my ears to make them fit.
There were two other apprentices. One was Steve Wilkins, seventeen or eighteen years old and a giant. When he was in Mr. S.'s clothes they fitted him as the candle-mould fits the candle—thus he was generally in a suffocated condition, particularly in the summer-time. He was a reckless, hilarious, admirable creature; he had no principles, and was delightful company. At first we three apprentices had to feed in the kitchen with the old slave cook and her very handsome and bright and well-behaved young mulatto daughter. For his own amusement—for he was not generally laboring for other people's amusement—Steve was constantly and persistently and loudly and elaborately making love to that mulatto girl and distressing the life out of her and worrying the old mother to death. She would say, "Now, Marse Steve, Marse Steve, can't you behave yourself?" With encouragement like that, Steve would naturally renew his attentions and emphasize them. It was killingly funny to Ralph and me. And, to speak truly, the old mother's[Pg 119] distress about it was merely a pretence. She quite well understood that by the customs of slaveholding communities it was Steve's right to make love to that girl if he wanted to. But the girl's distress was very real. She had a refined nature, and she took all Steve's extravagant love-making in resentful earnest.
There were two other apprentices. One was Steve Wilkins, around seventeen or eighteen years old and a giant. When he wore Mr. S.'s clothes, they fit him like a candle mold fits a candle—so he was usually pretty cramped, especially in the summer. He was a wild, fun-loving, impressive guy; he had no morals and was great company. At first, the three of us apprentices had to eat in the kitchen with the old slave cook and her very attractive, bright, and well-behaved young mulatto daughter. For his own entertainment—since he wasn't usually concerned about entertaining anyone else—Steve was constantly and loudly flirting with that mulatto girl, driving her crazy and giving her old mother a headache. She would say, "Now, Marse Steve, Marse Steve, can't you behave yourself?" With encouragement like that, Steve would obviously just step up his efforts even more. It was hilariously funny to Ralph and me. And honestly, the old mother's distress over it was just an act. She knew very well that in slaveholding communities, it was Steve's right to pursue that girl if he wanted to. But the girl's distress was very real. She had a sensitive nature, and she took all of Steve's over-the-top flirting to heart.
We got but little variety in the way of food at that kitchen table, and there wasn't enough of it anyway. So we apprentices used to keep alive by arts of our own—that is to say, we crept into the cellar nearly every night, by a private entrance which we had discovered, and we robbed the cellar of potatoes and onions and such things, and carried them down-town to the printing-office, where we slept on pallets on the floor, and cooked them at the stove and had very good times.
We had very little variety in the food at that kitchen table, and there wasn't nearly enough of it. So we apprentices had to find our own ways to survive—specifically, we sneaked into the cellar almost every night through a hidden entrance we’d found, and we stole potatoes, onions, and other stuff, then took it down to the printing office, where we crashed on pallets on the floor, cooked it on the stove, and had really good times.
As I have indicated, Mr. S.'s economies were of a pretty close and rigid kind. By and by, when we apprentices were promoted from the basement to the ground floor and allowed to sit at the family table, along with the one journeyman, Harry H., the economies continued. Mrs. S. was a bride. She had attained to that distinction very recently, after waiting a good part of a lifetime for it, and she was the right woman in the right place, according to the economics of the place, for she did not trust the sugar-bowl to us, but sweetened our coffee herself. That is, she went through the motions. She didn't really sweeten it. She seemed to put one heaping teaspoonful of brown sugar into each cup, but, according to Steve, that was a deceit. He said she dipped the spoon in the coffee first to make the sugar stick, and then scooped the sugar out of the bowl with the spoon upside down, so that the effect to the eye was a heaped-up spoon, whereas the sugar on it was nothing but a layer. This all seems perfectly true to me, and yet that thing would be so difficult to perform that I suppose it really didn't happen, but was one of Steve's lies.
As I mentioned, Mr. S.'s frugality was pretty strict and rigid. Eventually, when we apprentices were promoted from the basement to the ground floor and allowed to sit at the family table with the one journeyman, Harry H., the frugality continued. Mrs. S. was newly married. She had recently reached that milestone, after waiting a long time for it, and she was exactly the right person for the job, according to the household rules, because she didn’t trust us with the sugar bowl but sweetened our coffee herself. Well, she went through the motions. She didn’t actually sweeten it. She seemed to put a heaping teaspoon of brown sugar into each cup, but according to Steve, that was a trick. He claimed she dipped the spoon in the coffee first to make the sugar stick, and then scooped the sugar out of the bowl with the spoon turned upside down, so it looked like a heaping spoonful, while the actual sugar was only a thin layer. This seems perfectly plausible to me, yet that kind of sleight of hand would be so tricky that I suppose it probably didn’t happen, but was just one of Steve's stories.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCVIII.
FEBRUARY 1, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XI.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated March 28th, 1906.] About 1849 or 1850 Orion severed his connection with the printing-house in St. Louis and came up to Hannibal, and bought a weekly paper called the Hannibal "Journal," together with its plant and its good-will, for the sum of five hundred dollars cash. He borrowed the cash at ten per cent. interest, from an old farmer named Johnson who lived five miles out of town. Then he reduced the subscription price of the paper from two dollars to one dollar. He reduced the rates for advertising[Pg 226] in about the same proportion, and thus he created one absolute and unassailable certainty—to wit: that the business would never pay him a single cent of profit. He took me out of the "Courier" office and engaged my services in his own at three dollars and a half a week, which was an extravagant wage, but Orion was always generous, always liberal with everybody except himself. It cost him nothing in my case, for he never was able to pay me a penny as long as I was with him. By the end of the first year he found he must make some economies. The office rent was cheap, but it was not cheap enough. He could not afford to pay rent of any kind, so he moved the whole plant into the house we lived in, and it cramped the dwelling-place cruelly. He kept that paper alive during four years, but I have at this time no idea how he accomplished it. Toward the end of each year he had to turn out and scrape and scratch for the fifty dollars of interest due Mr. Johnson, and that fifty dollars was about the only cash he ever received or paid out, I suppose, while he was proprietor of that newspaper, except for ink and printing-paper. The paper was a dead failure. It had to be that from the start. Finally he handed it over to Mr. Johnson, and went up to Muscatine, Iowa, and acquired a small interest in a weekly newspaper there. It was not a sort of property to marry on—but no matter. He came across a winning and pretty girl who lived in Quincy, Illinois, a few miles below Keokuk, and they became engaged. He was always falling in love with girls, but by some accident or other he had never gone so far as engagement before. And now he achieved nothing but misfortune by it, because he straightway fell in love with a Keokuk girl. He married the Keokuk girl and they began a struggle for life which turned out to be a difficult enterprise, and very unpromising.
[Dictated March 28th, 1906.] Around 1849 or 1850, Orion ended his association with the printing house in St. Louis and moved to Hannibal, where he bought a weekly paper called the Hannibal "Journal," along with its equipment and goodwill, for five hundred dollars in cash. He borrowed the money at ten percent interest from an old farmer named Johnson who lived five miles outside of town. Then, he lowered the subscription price of the paper from two dollars to one dollar. He also reduced the advertising rates[Pg 226] by about the same amount, which guaranteed one undeniable fact: the business would never make him a single dollar of profit. He took me out of the "Courier" office and hired me at three dollars and fifty cents a week, which was a high wage, but Orion was always generous and open-handed with everyone except himself. It cost him nothing in my case, since he never managed to pay me anything while I worked with him. By the end of the first year, he realized he needed to cut costs. The office rent was cheap, but not cheap enough. He couldn’t afford to pay rent at all, so he moved everything into the house we lived in, which made it very cramped. He kept that paper running for four years, but I still have no idea how he managed it. Toward the end of each year, he had to hustle to scrape together the fifty dollars of interest owed to Mr. Johnson, and that fifty dollars was probably the only cash he ever received or paid out during his time as the owner of that newspaper, aside from purchasing ink and printing paper. The paper was a complete failure. It was destined to be that way from the start. Eventually, he handed it over to Mr. Johnson and moved to Muscatine, Iowa, where he got a small stake in a weekly newspaper there. It wasn’t the kind of thing you’d want to start a family on—but that didn’t matter. He met a lovely girl from Quincy, Illinois, just a few miles south of Keokuk, and they got engaged. He was always falling in love with girls, but somehow he had never gotten as far as an engagement before. And now, he only faced misfortune because he quickly fell in love with a girl from Keokuk. He married the Keokuk girl, and they began a difficult struggle for survival that turned out to be very unpromising.
To gain a living in Muscatine was plainly impossible, so Orion and his new wife went to Keokuk to live, for she wanted to be near her relatives. He bought a little bit of a job-printing plant—on credit, of course—and at once put prices down to where not even the apprentices could get a living out of it, and this sort of thing went on.
To make a living in Muscatine was clearly impossible, so Orion and his new wife moved to Keokuk to be closer to her family. He bought a small job-printing business—of course, on credit—and immediately lowered prices to the point where even the apprentices couldn’t make a living from it, and this situation continued.
I had not joined the Muscatine migration. Just before that happened (which I think was in 1853) I disappeared one night and fled to St. Louis. There I worked in the[Pg 227] composing-room of the "Evening News" for a time, and then started on my travels to see the world. The world was New York City, and there was a little World's Fair there. It had just been opened where the great reservoir afterward was, and where the sumptuous public library is now being built—Fifth Avenue and Forty-second Street. I arrived in New York with two or three dollars in pocket change and a ten-dollar bank-bill concealed in the lining of my coat. I got work at villainous wages in the establishment of John A. Gray and Green in Cliff Street, and I found board in a sufficiently villainous mechanics' boarding-house in Duane Street. The firm paid my wages in wildcat money at its face value, and my week's wage merely sufficed to pay board and lodging. By and by I went to Philadelphia and worked there some months as a "sub" on the "Inquirer" and the "Public Ledger." Finally I made a flying trip to Washington to see the sights there, and in 1854 I went back to the Mississippi Valley, sitting upright in the smoking-car two or three days and nights. When I reached St. Louis I was exhausted. I went to bed on board a steamboat that was bound for Muscatine. I fell asleep at once, with my clothes on, and didn't wake again for thirty-six hours.
I hadn't joined the Muscatine migration. Just before that happened (which I think was in 1853), I disappeared one night and headed to St. Louis. There, I worked in the[Pg 227] composing room of the "Evening News" for a while before starting my travels to see the world. The world was New York City, where a small World's Fair had just opened at the site of what would later become the great reservoir and the extravagant public library now under construction—Fifth Avenue and Forty-second Street. I arrived in New York with just a couple of dollars and a ten-dollar bill hidden in the lining of my coat. I managed to get a job with terrible pay at the John A. Gray and Green printing company on Cliff Street and found a room in a pretty rough mechanics' boarding house on Duane Street. The firm paid me in unreliable money at its face value, and my weekly wage barely covered my room and board. Eventually, I made my way to Philadelphia, where I worked for several months as a "sub" for the "Inquirer" and the "Public Ledger." After that, I took a quick trip to Washington to see the sights, and in 1854, I returned to the Mississippi Valley, sitting upright in the smoking car for two or three days and nights. By the time I got to St. Louis, I was drained. I crashed on a steamboat bound for Muscatine, fell asleep right away with my clothes on, and didn’t wake up for thirty-six hours.
... I worked in that little job-office in Keokuk as much as two years, I should say, without ever collecting a cent of wages, for Orion was never able to pay anything—but Dick Higham and I had good times. I don't know what Dick got, but it was probably only uncashable promises.
... I worked in that small job office in Keokuk for almost two years without ever getting paid a cent, since Orion was never able to pay anything—but Dick Higham and I had a great time. I’m not sure what Dick received, but it was probably just empty promises.
One day in the midwinter of 1856 or 1857—I think it was 1856—I was coming along the main street of Keokuk in the middle of the forenoon. It was bitter weather—so bitter that that street was deserted, almost. A light dry snow was blowing here and there on the ground and on the pavement, swirling this way and that way and making all sorts of beautiful figures, but very chilly to look at. The wind blew a piece of paper past me and it lodged against a wall of a house. Something about the look of it attracted my attention and I gathered it in. It was a fifty-dollar bill, the only one I had ever seen, and the largest assemblage of money I had ever encountered in one spot. I advertised it in the papers and suffered more than a thousand dollars' worth of solicitude and fear and distress during the next few days lest the owner should see the advertisement[Pg 228] and come and take my fortune away. As many as four days went by without an applicant; then I could endure this kind of misery no longer. I felt sure that another four could not go by in this safe and secure way. I felt that I must take that money out of danger. So I bought a ticket for Cincinnati and went to that city. I worked there several months in the printing-office of Wrightson and Company. I had been reading Lieutenant Herndon's account of his explorations of the Amazon and had been mightily attracted by what he said of coca. I made up my mind that I would go to the head waters of the Amazon and collect coca and trade in it and make a fortune. I left for New Orleans in the steamer "Paul Jones" with this great idea filling my mind. One of the pilots of that boat was Horace Bixby. Little by little I got acquainted with him, and pretty soon I was doing a lot of steering for him in his daylight watches. When I got to New Orleans I inquired about ships leaving for Pará and discovered that there weren't any, and learned that there probably wouldn't be any during that century. It had not occurred to me to inquire about those particulars before leaving Cincinnati, so there I was. I couldn't get to the Amazon. I had no friends in New Orleans and no money to speak of. I went to Horace Bixby and asked him to make a pilot out of me. He said he would do it for a hundred dollars cash in advance. So I steered for him up to St. Louis, borrowed the money from my brother-in-law and closed the bargain. I had acquired this brother-in-law several years before. This was Mr. William A. Moffett, a merchant, a Virginian—a fine man in every way. He had married my sister Pamela, and the Samuel E. Moffett of whom I have been speaking was their son. Within eighteen months I became a competent pilot, and I served that office until the Mississippi River traffic was brought to a standstill by the breaking out of the civil war.
One day in the winter of 1856 or 1857—I think it was 1856—I was walking down the main street of Keokuk in the late morning. It was freezing outside—so cold that the street was almost deserted. Light, dry snow was blowing around, swirling on the ground and pavement, creating all sorts of beautiful patterns, but it looked very chilly. The wind blew a piece of paper past me, and it got stuck against a wall of a house. Something about it caught my attention, so I picked it up. It was a fifty-dollar bill, the first one I had ever seen, and the largest amount of money I had ever found in one place. I put an ad in the papers and spent more than a thousand dollars' worth of worry and fear over the next few days, hoping the owner wouldn't see the ad[Pg 228] and come to take my fortune away. Four days passed without anyone coming forward, and I couldn't handle the stress anymore. I was sure that another four days wouldn't go by without something happening. I felt I had to take that money out of danger. So, I bought a ticket to Cincinnati and went there. I worked for several months at Wrightson and Company’s printing office. I had been reading Lieutenant Herndon’s account of his explorations of the Amazon and was really interested in what he said about coca. I decided I would go to the headwaters of the Amazon to collect coca, trade in it, and make a fortune. I left for New Orleans on the steamer "Paul Jones," filled with this big idea. One of the pilots on that boat was Horace Bixby. Gradually, I got to know him, and soon I was doing a lot of steering for him during his daylight shifts. When I got to New Orleans, I asked about ships going to Pará and found out there were none, and there probably wouldn't be any during that century. I hadn't thought to check on that before leaving Cincinnati, so I was stuck. I couldn't get to the Amazon. I didn't have friends in New Orleans and not much money. I went to Horace Bixby and asked him to train me as a pilot. He agreed, but for a hundred dollars upfront. So I steered for him up to St. Louis, borrowed the money from my brother-in-law, and sealed the deal. I had acquired this brother-in-law a few years earlier; he was Mr. William A. Moffett, a merchant from Virginia—a great guy all around. He was married to my sister Pamela, and Samuel E. Moffett, whom I mentioned earlier, was their son. Within eighteen months, I became a skilled pilot, and I held that position until traffic on the Mississippi River came to a halt with the start of the Civil War.
... Meantime Orion had gone down the river and established his little job-printing-office in Keokuk. On account of charging next to nothing for the work done in his job-office, he had almost nothing to do there. He was never able to comprehend that work done on a profitless basis deteriorates and is presently not worth anything, and that customers are then obliged to go where they can get better work, even if they must pay better prices for it. He had plenty of time, and he took up Blackstone again.[Pg 229] He also put up a sign which offered his services to the public as a lawyer. He never got a case, in those days, nor even an applicant, although he was quite willing to transact law business for nothing and furnish the stationery himself. He was always liberal that way.
... In the meantime, Orion had moved down the river and set up his small printing business in Keokuk. Because he charged almost nothing for his work, he barely had any customers. He never realized that when work is done without profit, it loses value and ends up being unworthy, causing customers to seek better quality elsewhere, even if it means paying higher prices. With plenty of free time, he picked up Blackstone again.[Pg 229] He also put up a sign offering his services as a lawyer. During that time, he never got a case or even an inquiry, even though he was more than willing to handle legal work for free and provide the stationery himself. He was always generous like that.
Presently he moved to a wee little hamlet called Alexandria, two or three miles down the river, and he put up that sign there. He got no custom. He was by this time very hard aground. But by this time I was beginning to earn a wage of two hundred and fifty dollars a month as pilot, and so I supported him thenceforth until 1861, when his ancient friend, Edward Bates, then a member of Mr. Lincoln's first cabinet, got him the place of Secretary of the new Territory of Nevada, and Orion and I cleared for that country in the overland stage-coach, I paying the fares, which were pretty heavy, and carrying with me what money I had been able to save—this was eight hundred dollars, I should say—and it was all in silver coin and a good deal of a nuisance because of its weight. And we had another nuisance, which was an Unabridged Dictionary. It weighed about a thousand pounds, and was a ruinous expense, because the stage-coach Company charged for extra baggage by the ounce. We could have kept a family for a time on what that dictionary cost in the way of extra freight—and it wasn't a good dictionary anyway—didn't have any modern words in it—only had obsolete ones that they used to use when Noah Webster was a child.
Right now, he moved to a tiny village called Alexandria, just a couple of miles down the river, and put up that sign there. He didn't get any customers. By this time, he was really in a tough spot. But I was starting to make a monthly salary of two hundred and fifty dollars as a pilot, so I supported him from then on until 1861, when his old friend, Edward Bates, who was a member of Mr. Lincoln's first cabinet, helped him get the position of Secretary for the new Territory of Nevada. Orion and I set off for that area in the overland stagecoach, with me covering the pretty hefty fares and bringing along what little money I had saved up—about eight hundred dollars, all in silver coins, which was a hassle because of the weight. We also had another problem: an Unabridged Dictionary. It weighed about a thousand pounds, and it was a costly nightmare since the stagecoach company charged for extra baggage by the ounce. We could have supported a family for quite a while on what that dictionary cost in extra fees—and it wasn't even a good dictionary—it didn't have any modern words, just outdated ones that were used back when Noah Webster was a kid.
The Government of the new Territory of Nevada was an interesting menagerie. Governor Nye was an old and seasoned politician from New York—politician, not statesman. He had white hair; he was in fine physical condition; he had a winningly friendly face and deep lustrous brown eyes that could talk as a native language the tongue of every feeling, every passion, every emotion. His eyes could outtalk his tongue, and this is saying a good deal, for he was a very remarkable talker, both in private and on the stump. He was a shrewd man; he generally saw through surfaces and perceived what was going on inside without being suspected of having an eye on the matter.
The government of the new Territory of Nevada was quite a mix of personalities. Governor Nye was an experienced politician from New York—politician, not statesman. He had white hair, was in great shape, and had a charming, friendly face with deep, expressive brown eyes that could convey every feeling, passion, and emotion. His eyes could say more than his words, which is impressive because he was a skilled speaker, both privately and when campaigning. He was a sharp guy; he usually saw beyond the surface and understood what was happening inside without anyone realizing he was paying attention.
When grown-up persons indulge in practical jokes, the fact gauges them. They have lived narrow, obscure, and ignorant lives, and at full manhood they still retain and cherish a job-lot of left-over standards and ideals that would have been discarded[Pg 230] with their boyhood if they had then moved out into the world and a broader life. There were many practical jokers in the new Territory. I do not take pleasure in exposing this fact, for I liked those people; but what I am saying is true. I wish I could say a kindlier thing about them instead—that they were burglars, or hat-rack thieves, or something like that, that wouldn't be utterly uncomplimentary. I would prefer it, but I can't say those things, they would not be true. These people were practical jokers, and I will not try to disguise it. In other respects they were plenty good-enough people; honest people; reputable and likable. They played practical jokes upon each other with success, and got the admiration and applause and also the envy of the rest of the community. Naturally they were eager to try their arts on big game, and that was what the Governor was. But they were not able to score. They made several efforts, but the Governor defeated these efforts without any trouble and went on smiling his pleasant smile as if nothing had happened. Finally the joker chiefs of Carson City and Virginia City conspired together to see if their combined talent couldn't win a victory, for the jokers were getting into a very uncomfortable place: the people were laughing at them, instead of at their proposed victim. They banded themselves together to the number of ten and invited the Governor to what was a most extraordinary attention in those days—pickled oyster stew and champagne—luxuries very seldom seen in that region, and existing rather as fabrics of the imagination than as facts.
When adults engage in practical jokes, it reveals a lot about them. They've led narrow, obscure, and uninformed lives, and even as grownups, they still hold onto a bunch of outdated standards and ideals that they would have let go of in their youth if they had ventured out into the world and experienced a bigger life. There were a lot of practical jokers in the new Territory. I’m not happy to point this out because I liked those people, but it’s the truth. I wish I could say something nicer about them, like that they were burglars or hat-rack thieves, or something else that wouldn't be so harsh. I’d like that, but I can’t say those things because they wouldn’t be true. These folks were practical jokers, and I won’t try to sugarcoat it. In other ways, they were perfectly decent people; honest, reputable, and likable. They successfully played practical jokes on each other and earned the admiration, applause, and envy of the rest of the community. Naturally, they were eager to test their skills on someone bigger, and the Governor was that target. But they couldn’t pull it off. They made several attempts, but the Governor easily thwarted them, continuing to smile as if nothing had happened. Eventually, the leading jokers from Carson City and Virginia City teamed up to see if their collective talents could secure a victory, as they were becoming increasingly uncomfortable: the community was laughing at them instead of their intended victim. They gathered a group of ten and invited the Governor to something quite remarkable for that time—pickled oyster stew and champagne—luxuries rarely seen in that area, more like fantasies than reality.
The Governor took me with him. He said disparagingly,
The Governor took me along with him. He said in a dismissive tone,
"It's a poor invention. It doesn't deceive. Their idea is to get me drunk and leave me under the table, and from their standpoint this will be very funny. But they don't know me. I am familiar with champagne and have no prejudices against it."
"It's a terrible invention. It doesn't fool anyone. Their plan is to get me drunk and leave me under the table, and from their perspective, that's hilarious. But they don't know me. I'm well acquainted with champagne and have no issues with it."
The fate of the joke was not decided until two o'clock in the morning. At that hour the Governor was serene, genial, comfortable, contented, happy and sober, although he was so full that he couldn't laugh without shedding champagne tears. Also, at that hour the last joker joined his comrades under the table, drunk to the last perfection. The Governor remarked,
The fate of the joke was not decided until two o'clock in the morning. At that hour, the Governor was calm, friendly, relaxed, satisfied, happy, and sober, although he was so full that he couldn't laugh without spilling champagne tears. Also, at that hour, the last joker joined his friends under the table, perfectly drunk. The Governor remarked,
"This is a dry place, Sam, let's go and get something to drink and go to bed."
"This place is dry, Sam, let's grab something to drink and go to bed."
The Governor's official menagerie had been drawn from the[Pg 231] humblest ranks of his constituents at home—harmless good fellows who had helped in his campaigns, and now they had their reward in petty salaries payable in greenbacks that were worth next to nothing. Those boys had a hard time to make both ends meet. Orion's salary was eighteen hundred dollars a year, and he wouldn't even support his dictionary on it. But the Irishwoman who had come out on the Governor's staff charged the menagerie only ten dollars a week apiece for board and lodging. Orion and I were of her boarders and lodgers; and so, on these cheap terms the silver I had brought from home held out very well.
The Governor's official menagerie was made up of the [Pg 231] most ordinary folks from his home state—decent guys who had supported his campaigns, and now they were rewarded with small salaries paid in greenbacks that were nearly worthless. Those guys really struggled to get by. Orion's salary was eighteen hundred dollars a year, and he couldn't even afford to buy a dictionary with it. However, the Irishwoman who worked for the Governor charged the menagerie just ten dollars a week each for board and lodging. Orion and I were among her tenants; thanks to those low rates, the silver I had brought from home lasted quite a while.
At first I roamed about the country seeking silver, but at the end of '62 or the beginning of '63 when I came up from Aurora to begin a journalistic life on the Virginia City "Enterprise," I was presently sent down to Carson City to report the legislative session. Orion was soon very popular with the members of the legislature, because they found that whereas they couldn't usually trust each other, nor anybody else, they could trust him. He easily held the belt for honesty in that country, but it didn't do him any good in a pecuniary way, because he had no talent for either persuading or scaring legislators. But I was differently situated. I was there every day in the legislature to distribute compliment and censure with evenly balanced justice and spread the same over half a page of the "Enterprise" every morning, consequently I was an influence. I got the legislature to pass a wise and very necessary law requiring every corporation doing business in the Territory to record its charter in full, without skipping a word, in a record to be kept by the Secretary of the Territory—my brother. All the charters were framed in exactly the same words. For this record-service he was authorized to charge forty cents a folio of one hundred words for making the record; also five dollars for furnishing a certificate of each record, and so on. Everybody had a toll-road franchise, but no toll-road. But the franchise had to be recorded and paid for. Everybody was a mining corporation, and had to have himself recorded and pay for it. Very well, we prospered. The record-service paid an average of a thousand dollars a month, in gold.
At first, I traveled around the country looking for silver, but at the end of '62 or the start of '63, when I moved from Aurora to start a journalism career at the Virginia City "Enterprise," I was quickly sent to Carson City to cover the legislative session. Orion quickly became popular with the lawmakers because they realized that, while they couldn’t usually trust each other or anyone else, they could trust him. He easily earned a reputation for honesty in that area, but it didn’t benefit him financially because he had no skill in either convincing or intimidating legislators. I was in a different position. I attended the legislature daily to deliver praise and criticism with fair judgment and covered the same in half a page of the "Enterprise" every morning, making me influential. I managed to get the legislature to pass a smart and necessary law requiring every corporation operating in the Territory to record its full charter without skipping a word in a record maintained by the Secretary of the Territory—my brother. All the charters were written in exactly the same way. For this record-keeping service, he was allowed to charge forty cents per one hundred words for creating the record, as well as five dollars for providing a certificate for each record, and so on. Everyone had a toll-road franchise but no actual toll road. However, the franchise had to be recorded and paid for. Everyone was a mining corporation and had to be recorded and pay for it. Well, we thrived. The record-keeping service brought in an average of a thousand dollars a month, in gold.
Governor Nye was often absent from the Territory. He liked to run down to San Francisco every little while and enjoy a rest from Territorial civilization. Nobody complained, for he was[Pg 232] prodigiously popular, he had been a stage-driver in his early days in New York or New England, and had acquired the habit of remembering names and faces, and of making himself agreeable to his passengers. As a politician this had been valuable to him, and he kept his arts in good condition by practice. By the time he had been Governor a year, he had shaken hands with every human being in the Territory of Nevada, and after that he always knew these people instantly at sight and could call them by name. The whole population, of 20,000 persons, were his personal friends, and he could do anything he chose to do and count upon their being contented with it. Whenever he was absent from the Territory—which was generally—Orion served his office in his place, as Acting Governor, a title which was soon and easily shortened to "Governor." He recklessly built and furnished a house at a cost of twelve thousand dollars, and there was no other house in the sage-brush capital that could approach this property for style and cost.
Governor Nye was often away from the Territory. He liked to take trips to San Francisco every now and then to escape from Territorial life. Nobody minded because he was[Pg 232] extremely popular. He had been a stagecoach driver in his early days in New York or New England and developed a knack for remembering names and faces, making himself likable to his passengers. This skill proved valuable in his political career, and he maintained it through practice. By the end of his first year as Governor, he had shaken hands with everyone in Nevada, and after that, he could recognize them immediately and call them by name. The entire population of 20,000 people were his personal friends, and he could do whatever he wanted, knowing they would be satisfied with it. Whenever he was away from the Territory—which was often—Orion took over his position as Acting Governor, a title that quickly became just "Governor." He boldly built and furnished a house for twelve thousand dollars, and there was no other house in the sagebrush capital that could compare in style and price.
When Governor Nye's four-year term was drawing to a close, the mystery of why he had ever consented to leave the great State of New York and help inhabit that jack-rabbit desert was solved: he had gone out there in order to become a United States Senator. All that was now necessary was to turn the Territory into a State. He did it without any difficulty. That undeveloped country and that sparse population were not well fitted for the heavy burden of a State Government, but no matter, the people were willing to have the change, and so the Governor's game was made.
When Governor Nye's four-year term was coming to an end, the mystery of why he ever agreed to leave the great State of New York and help settle that barren land was revealed: he went there to become a United States Senator. All that was left to do was turn the Territory into a State. He managed that without any trouble. That undeveloped area and its small population weren't well suited for the demands of a State Government, but it didn't matter; the people wanted the change, so the Governor achieved his goal.
Orion's game was made too, apparently, for he was as popular because of his honesty as the Governor was for more substantial reasons; but at the critical moment the inborn capriciousness of his character rose up without warning, and disaster followed.
Orion's game was made too, apparently, since he was as popular for his honesty as the Governor was for more important reasons; but at the crucial moment, his natural unpredictability showed up out of nowhere, and disaster struck.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCIX.
FEBRUARY 15, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
Orion Clemens—resumed.
Orion Clemens—continued.
[Dictated April 5, 1906.] There were several candidates for all the offices in the gift of the new State of Nevada save two—United States Senator, and Secretary of State. Nye was certain to get a Senatorship, and Orion was so sure to get the Secretaryship that no one but him was named for that office. But he was hit with one of his spasms of virtue on the very day that the Republican party was to make its nominations in the Convention, and refused to go near the Convention. He was urged, but all persuasions failed. He said his presence there would be an unfair and improper influence and that if he was to be nominated the compliment must come to[Pg 338] him as a free and unspotted gift. This attitude would have settled his case for him without further effort, but he had another attack of virtue on the same day, that made it absolutely sure. It had been his habit for a great many years to change his religion with his shirt, and his ideas about temperance at the same time. He would be a teetotaler for a while and the champion of the cause; then he would change to the other side for a time. On nomination day he suddenly changed from a friendly attitude toward whiskey—which was the popular attitude—to uncompromising teetotalism, and went absolutely dry. His friends besought and implored, but all in vain. He could not be persuaded to cross the threshold of a saloon. The paper next morning contained the list of chosen nominees. His name was not in it. He had not received a vote.
[Dictated April 5, 1906.] There were several candidates for all the offices in the new State of Nevada except for two—United States Senator and Secretary of State. Nye was certain to get a Senate seat, and Orion was so assured of getting the Secretary position that no one else was even considered for it. However, on the very day the Republican party was set to make its nominations at the Convention, he had one of his moments of virtue and refused to attend. Despite being urged, none of the persuading worked. He stated that his presence would create an unfair and improper influence, insisting that if he were to be nominated, it must be as a genuinely free and untainted gift. This stance would have secured his nomination without any further effort, but he had another moral attack on the same day, which made his outcome even more certain. For many years, he had a habit of switching his beliefs like outfits, including his views on temperance. He would be a teetotaler for a time, strongly advocating for the cause, only to later switch to the opposite side. On nomination day, he suddenly shifted from a supportive view of whiskey—which was the popular stance—to strict teetotalism, deciding to go completely dry. His friends begged and pleaded, but it was all in vain. He wouldn't step foot inside a saloon. The next morning's paper listed the nominated candidates, and his name was absent. He hadn't received a single vote.
His rich income ceased when the State government came into power. He was without an occupation. Something had to be done. He put up his sign as attorney-at-law, but he got no clients. It was strange. It was difficult to account for. I cannot account for it—but if I were going to guess at a solution I should guess that by the make of him he would examine both sides of a case so diligently and so conscientiously that when he got through with his argument neither he nor a jury would know which side he was on. I think that his client would find out his make in laying his case before him, and would take warning and withdraw it in time to save himself from probable disaster.
His good income ended when the state government took over. He was out of work. Something needed to change. He put up a sign saying he was an attorney, but he didn’t get any clients. It was odd. It was hard to understand. I can't explain it—but if I had to guess why, I’d say that he would look at both sides of a case so thoroughly and carefully that by the time he finished his argument, neither he nor a jury would know which side he was on. I think his clients would realize this when they presented their cases to him and would wisely withdraw before risking disaster.
I had taken up my residence in San Francisco about a year before the time I have just been speaking of. One day I got a tip from Mr. Camp, a bold man who was always making big fortunes in ingenious speculations and losing them again in the course of six months by other speculative ingenuities. Camp told me to buy some shares in the Hale and Norcross. I bought fifty shares at three hundred dollars a share. I bought on a margin, and put up twenty per cent. It exhausted my funds. I wrote Orion and offered him half, and asked him to send his share of the money. I waited and waited. He wrote and said he was going to attend to it. The stock went along up pretty briskly. It went higher and higher. It reached a thousand dollars a share. It climbed to two thousand, then to three thousand; then to twice that figure. The money did not come, but I was not disturbed. By and by that stock took a turn and began to[Pg 339] gallop down. Then I wrote urgently. Orion answered that he had sent the money long ago—said he had sent it to the Occidental Hotel. I inquired for it. They said it was not there. To cut a long story short, that stock went on down until it fell below the price I had paid for it. Then it began to eat up the margin, and when at last I got out I was very badly crippled.
I had moved to San Francisco about a year before the time I just mentioned. One day, I got a tip from Mr. Camp, a daring guy who was always making and losing big money through clever investments. Camp told me to buy some shares in the Hale and Norcross. I bought fifty shares at three hundred dollars a share. I purchased on margin and put up twenty percent. That drained my funds. I wrote to Orion, offered him half, and asked him to send his share of the money. I waited and waited. He wrote back, saying he would take care of it. The stock started to rise pretty quickly. It kept going higher and higher, reaching a thousand dollars a share, then two thousand, and eventually three thousand; then it doubled that. The money never came, but I wasn't worried. Eventually, that stock took a downturn and started to plummet. Then I wrote frantically. Orion replied that he had sent the money a while ago—he said he had sent it to the Occidental Hotel. I asked about it there. They told me it wasn't there. To make a long story short, that stock continued to drop until it fell below the price I had paid for it. Then it began to eat into the margin, and when I finally got out, I was left in a really bad situation.
When it was too late, I found out what had become of Orion's money. Any other human being would have sent a check, but he sent gold. The hotel clerk put it in the safe and went on vacation, and there it had reposed all this time enjoying its fatal work, no doubt. Another man might have thought to tell me that the money was not in a letter, but was in an express package, but it never occurred to Orion to do that.
When it was too late, I discovered what had happened to Orion's money. Any other person would have sent a check, but he sent gold. The hotel clerk put it in the safe and went on vacation, and there it had stayed all this time, no doubt enjoying its deadly purpose. Another person might have thought to tell me that the money wasn’t in a letter, but in an express package, but it never crossed Orion's mind to do that.
Later, Mr. Camp gave me another chance. He agreed to buy our Tennessee land for two hundred thousand dollars, pay a part of the amount in cash and give long notes for the rest. His scheme was to import foreigners from grape-growing and wine-making districts in Europe, settle them on the land, and turn it into a wine-growing country. He knew what Mr. Longworth thought of those Tennessee grapes, and was satisfied. I sent the contracts and things to Orion for his signature, he being one of the three heirs. But they arrived at a bad time—in a doubly bad time, in fact. The temperance virtue was temporarily upon him in strong force, and he wrote and said that he would not be a party to debauching the country with wine. Also he said how could he know whether Mr. Camp was going to deal fairly and honestly with those poor people from Europe or not?—and so, without waiting to find out, he quashed the whole trade, and there it fell, never to be brought to life again. The land, from being suddenly worth two hundred thousand dollars, became as suddenly worth what it was before—nothing, and taxes to pay. I had paid the taxes and the other expenses for some years, but I dropped the Tennessee land there, and have never taken any interest in it since, pecuniarily or otherwise, until yesterday.
Later, Mr. Camp gave me another chance. He agreed to buy our land in Tennessee for two hundred thousand dollars, paying part of it in cash and giving long notes for the rest. His plan was to bring in people from grape-growing and wine-making regions in Europe, settle them on the land, and turn it into a wine-producing area. He knew what Mr. Longworth thought of those Tennessee grapes and was okay with it. I sent the contracts and other documents to Orion for his signature, since he was one of the three heirs. But they came at a bad time—actually, a really bad time. He was feeling strongly about temperance and wrote back saying he wouldn’t be part of ruining the country with wine. He also mentioned how he could know if Mr. Camp would treat those poor people from Europe fairly or not? So, without waiting to see, he canceled the whole deal, and it fell apart, never to be revived. The land, which had suddenly been worth two hundred thousand dollars, just as suddenly became worthless again—nothing, plus taxes to pay. I had been covering the taxes and other costs for a few years, but I let go of the Tennessee land and haven’t cared about it since, financially or otherwise, until yesterday.
I had supposed, until yesterday, that Orion had frittered away the last acre, and indeed that was his own impression. But a gentleman arrived yesterday from Tennessee and brought a map showing that by a correction of the ancient surveys we still own a thousand acres, in a coal district, out of the hundred thousand acres which my father left us when he died in 1847. The gen[Pg 340]tleman brought a proposition; also he brought a reputable and well-to-do citizen of New York. The proposition was that the Tennesseean gentleman should sell that land; that the New York gentleman should pay all the expenses and fight all the lawsuits, in case any should turn up, and that of such profit as might eventuate the Tennesseean gentleman should take a third, the New-Yorker a third, and Sam Moffett and his sister and I—who are surviving heirs—the remaining third.
I thought, until yesterday, that Orion had wasted the last piece of land, and he believed that too. But a man showed up yesterday from Tennessee with a map that revealed, due to a correction of outdated surveys, we still own a thousand acres in a coal region, out of the hundred thousand acres my father left us when he passed away in 1847. The man brought a proposal; he also brought along a respectable and well-off citizen from New York. The proposal was that the guy from Tennessee would sell that land; the New Yorker would cover all the costs and handle any legal issues that might come up, and from any profits that might result, the Tennessee man would take a third, the New Yorker another third, and Sam Moffett, his sister, and I—the remaining heirs—would split the final third.
This time I hope we shall get rid of the Tennessee land for good and all and never hear of it again.
This time I really hope we can finally get rid of the Tennessee land for good and never have to think about it again.
I came East in January, 1867. Orion remained in Carson City perhaps a year longer. Then he sold his twelve-thousand-dollar house and its furniture for thirty-five hundred in greenbacks at about sixty per cent. discount. He and his wife took passage in the steamer for home in Keokuk. About 1871 or '72 they came to New York. Orion had been trying to make a living in the law ever since he had arrived from the Pacific Coast, but he had secured only two cases. Those he was to try free of charge—but the possible result will never be known, because the parties settled the cases out of court without his help.
I moved East in January 1867. Orion stayed in Carson City for about a year longer. Then he sold his $12,000 house and its furniture for $3,500 in cash, at roughly a 60% discount. He and his wife took a steamer back home to Keokuk. Around 1871 or '72, they came to New York. Since arriving from the Pacific Coast, Orion had been trying to make a living practicing law, but he only secured two cases. He was supposed to handle them for free, but the outcomes will never be known because the parties settled out of court without his involvement.
Orion got a job as proof-reader on the New York "Evening Post" at ten dollars a week. By and by he came to Hartford and wanted me to get him a place as reporter on a Hartford paper. Here was a chance to try my scheme again, and I did it. I made him go to the Hartford "Evening Post," without any letter of introduction, and propose to scrub and sweep and do all sorts of things for nothing, on the plea that he didn't need money but only needed work, and that that was what he was pining for. Within six weeks he was on the editorial staff of that paper at twenty dollars a week, and he was worth the money. He was presently called for by some other paper at better wages, but I made him go to the "Post" people and tell them about it. They stood the raise and kept him. It was the pleasantest berth he had ever had in his life. It was an easy berth. He was in every way comfortable. But ill-luck came. It was bound to come.
Orion got a job as a proofreader at the New York "Evening Post" for ten dollars a week. Eventually, he came to Hartford and asked me to help him find a reporting job at a Hartford paper. This was a chance to try my method again, so I did. I made him go to the Hartford "Evening Post," without any letter of introduction, and offer to clean and handle all sorts of tasks for free, claiming that he didn't need the money but just wanted the work, and that was what he was longing for. Within six weeks, he was on the editorial staff of that paper at twenty dollars a week, and he was worth every penny. Soon, another paper called him with better pay, but I made him go tell the "Post" folks about it. They agreed to the raise and kept him. It was the best job he had ever had in his life. It was an easy job, and he was very comfortable. But bad luck struck. It was bound to happen.
A new Republican daily was to be started in a New England city by a stock company of well-to-do politicians, and they offered him the chief editorship at three thousand a year. He was eager[Pg 341] to accept. My beseechings and reasonings went for nothing. I said,
A new Republican newspaper was set to launch in a New England city by a group of wealthy politicians, and they offered him the position of chief editor at three thousand a year. He was excited[Pg 341] to take it. My pleas and arguments meant nothing. I said,
"You are as weak as water. Those people will find it out right away. They will easily see that you have no backbone; that they can deal with you as they would deal with a slave. You may last six months, but not longer. Then they will not dismiss you as they would dismiss a gentleman: they will fling you out as they would fling out an intruding tramp."
"You’re as weak as water. Those people will figure it out immediately. They’ll easily see that you have no backbone; that they can treat you like a slave. You might last six months, but not any longer. Then they won’t dismiss you like they would a gentleman: they’ll throw you out like an unwanted vagrant."
It happened just so. Then he and his wife migrated to Keokuk once more. Orion wrote from there that he was not resuming the law; that he thought that what his health needed was the open air, in some sort of outdoor occupation; that his father-in-law had a strip of ground on the river border a mile above Keokuk with some sort of a house on it, and his idea was to buy that place and start a chicken-farm and provide Keokuk with chickens and eggs, and perhaps butter—but I don't know whether you can raise butter on a chicken-farm or not. He said the place could be had for three thousand dollars cash, and I sent the money. He began to raise chickens, and he made a detailed monthly report to me, whereby it appeared that he was able to work off his chickens on the Keokuk people at a dollar and a quarter a pair. But it also appeared that it cost a dollar and sixty cents to raise the pair. This did not seem to discourage Orion, and so I let it go. Meantime he was borrowing a hundred dollars per month of me regularly, month by month. Now to show Orion's stern and rigid business ways—and he really prided himself on his large business capacities—the moment he received the advance of a hundred dollars at the beginning of each month, he always sent me his note for the amount, and with it he sent, out of that money, three months' interest on the hundred dollars at six per cent. per annum, these notes being always for three months.
It happened just like that. Then he and his wife moved back to Keokuk again. Orion wrote from there that he wasn’t going back to law; he thought what he really needed was fresh air and some kind of outdoor work. He mentioned that his father-in-law had a piece of land by the river, about a mile above Keokuk, with some kind of house on it, and his plan was to buy that place and start a chicken farm to supply Keokuk with chickens and eggs, and maybe butter—but I’m not sure if you can raise butter on a chicken farm. He said the property could be bought for three thousand dollars cash, so I sent him the money. He started raising chickens and provided me with a detailed monthly report, which showed he was selling his chickens to the people of Keokuk for a dollar and twenty-five cents a pair. However, it also showed that it cost a dollar and sixty cents to raise each pair. This didn’t seem to discourage Orion, so I just let it be. Meanwhile, he was borrowing a hundred dollars from me every month, regularly. To illustrate Orion’s strict and serious business approach—and he really took pride in his business skills—the moment he received the hundred dollars at the start of each month, he always sent me a note for that amount, along with three months' interest on the hundred dollars at six percent per annum, with these notes always covering three months.
As I say, he always sent a detailed statement of the month's profit and loss on the chickens—at least the month's loss on the chickens—and this detailed statement included the various items of expense—corn for the chickens, boots for himself, and so on; even car fares, and the weekly contribution of ten cents to help out the missionaries who were trying to damn the Chinese after a plan not satisfactory to those people.
As I mentioned, he always sent a detailed breakdown of the month's profits and losses on the chickens—mostly just losses—and this breakdown included various expenses—chicken feed, new boots for himself, and so on; even cab fares, and the weekly ten-cent contribution to support the missionaries who were trying to convert the Chinese with a plan that wasn't really working for those people.
I think the poultry experiment lasted about a year, possibly two years. It had then cost me six thousand dollars.
I think the poultry experiment lasted around a year, maybe two years. It ended up costing me six thousand dollars.
[Pg 342]Orion returned to the law business, and I suppose he remained in that harness off and on for the succeeding quarter of a century, but so far as my knowledge goes he was only a lawyer in name, and had no clients.
[Pg 342]Orion went back to practicing law, and I guess he stayed in that role on and off for the next twenty-five years, but as far as I know, he was just a lawyer in name and didn't have any clients.
My mother died, in her eighty-eighth year, in the summer of 1890. She had saved some money, and she left it to me, because it had come from me. I gave it to Orion and he said, with thanks, that I had supported him long enough and now he was going to relieve me of that burden, and would also hope to pay back some of that expense, and maybe the whole of it. Accordingly, he proceeded to use up that money in building a considerable addition to the house, with the idea of taking boarders and getting rich. We need not dwell upon this venture. It was another of his failures. His wife tried hard to make the scheme succeed, and if anybody could have made it succeed she would have done it. She was a good woman, and was greatly liked. She had a practical side, and she would have made that boarding-house lucrative if circumstances had not been against her.
My mother passed away at the age of eighty-seven in the summer of 1890. She had saved some money and left it to me, as it had come from me. I gave it to Orion, and he thanked me, saying that I had supported him long enough and that now he would relieve me of that burden and hoped to pay back some of those expenses, maybe even all of it. So, he used that money to build a significant addition to the house, planning to take in boarders and get rich. We don’t need to dwell on that venture; it was just another one of his failures. His wife worked hard to make the project succeed, and if anyone could have made it work, it would have been her. She was a wonderful woman and well-liked. She had a practical side and would have made that boarding house profitable if circumstances hadn’t been against her.
Orion had other projects for recouping me, but as they always required capital I stayed out of them, and they did not materialize. Once he wanted to start a newspaper. It was a ghastly idea, and I squelched it with a promptness that was almost rude. Then he invented a wood-sawing machine and patched it together himself, and he really sawed wood with it. It was ingenious; it was capable; and it would have made a comfortable little fortune for him; but just at the wrong time Providence interfered again. Orion applied for a patent and found that the same machine had already been patented and had gone into business and was thriving.
Orion had other plans for getting me back on my feet, but since they always needed funding, I stayed away from them, and they never took off. One time, he wanted to launch a newspaper. It was a terrible idea, and I shut it down so quickly it was almost impolite. Then he came up with a wood-sawing machine and put it together himself, and it actually worked to saw wood. It was clever and effective, and it could have earned him a nice little profit, but just at the worst moment, fate intervened again. Orion applied for a patent and discovered that the same machine had already been patented, was in production, and was doing well.
Presently the State of New York offered a fifty-thousand-dollar prize for a practical method of navigating the Erie Canal with steam canal-boats. Orion worked at that thing for two or three years, invented and completed a method, and was once more ready to reach out and seize upon imminent wealth when somebody pointed out a defect: his steam canal-boat could not be used in the winter-time; and in the summer-time the commotion its wheels would make in the water would wash away the State of New York on both sides.
Currently, the State of New York is offering a $50,000 prize for a practical method of navigating the Erie Canal with steam canal boats. Orion worked on this for two or three years, invented and perfected a method, and was once again ready to grasp the wealth within reach when someone pointed out a flaw: his steam canal boat couldn’t be used in winter, and in the summer, the noise from its wheels would erode the banks of the canal on both sides.
Innumerable were Orion's projects for acquiring the means to[Pg 343] pay off the debt to me. These projects extended straight through the succeeding thirty years, but in every case they failed. During all those thirty years his well-established honesty kept him in offices of trust where other people's money had to be taken care of, but where no salary was paid. He was treasurer of all the benevolent institutions; he took care of the money and other property of widows and orphans; he never lost a cent for anybody, and never made one for himself. Every time he changed his religion the church of his new faith was glad to get him; made him treasurer at once, and at once he stopped the graft and the leaks in that church. He exhibited a facility in changing his political complexion that was a marvel to the whole community. Once the following curious thing happened, and he wrote me all about it himself.
Countless were Orion's plans to find the means to[Pg 343] pay off his debt to me. These plans stretched out over the next thirty years, but they all fell through. Throughout those thirty years, his well-known honesty kept him in trusted positions where he managed other people's money, but without a salary. He was the treasurer for all the charitable organizations; he handled the money and property of widows and orphans; he never lost a cent for anyone and never profited for himself. Every time he changed his religion, the church of his new faith welcomed him; they made him treasurer right away, and he immediately fixed any corruption and gaps in that church’s finances. His ability to shift his political affiliations was something the entire community found remarkable. Once, something unusual happened that he wrote to me about himself.
One morning he was a Republican, and upon invitation he agreed to make a campaign speech at the Republican mass-meeting that night. He prepared the speech. After luncheon he became a Democrat and agreed to write a score of exciting mottoes to be painted upon the transparencies which the Democrats would carry in their torchlight procession that night. He wrote these shouting Democratic mottoes during the afternoon, and they occupied so much of his time that it was night before he had a chance to change his politics again; so he actually made a rousing Republican campaign speech in the open air while his Democratic transparencies passed by in front of him, to the joy of every witness present.
One morning he identified as a Republican, and when invited, he agreed to give a campaign speech at the Republican rally that evening. He worked on the speech. After lunch, he switched to being a Democrat and agreed to create a bunch of catchy slogans to be painted on the banners that the Democrats would carry in their torchlight parade that night. He spent the afternoon writing these enthusiastic Democratic slogans, and it took so much of his time that by the time night came, he hadn’t had a chance to switch his political stance again; so he ended up delivering an energizing Republican campaign speech outdoors while the Democratic banners passed right in front of him, much to the delight of everyone there.
He was a most strange creature—but in spite of his eccentricities he was beloved, all his life, in whatsoever community he lived. And he was also held in high esteem, for at bottom he was a sterling man.
He was a really unusual person—but despite his quirks, he was loved throughout his life, no matter where he lived. He was also highly respected, because deep down, he was a genuine man.
About twenty-five years ago—along there somewhere—I suggested to Orion that he write an autobiography. I asked him to try to tell the straight truth in it; to refrain from exhibiting himself in creditable attitudes exclusively, and to honorably set down all the incidents of his life which he had found interesting to him, including those which were burned into his memory because he was ashamed of them. I said that this had never been done, and that if he could do it his autobiography would be a most valuable piece of literature. I said I was offering him a job which I could not duplicate in my own case, but I would[Pg 344] cherish the hope that he might succeed with it. I recognise now that I was trying to saddle upon him an impossibility. I have been dictating this autobiography of mine daily for three months; I have thought of fifteen hundred or two thousand incidents in my life which I am ashamed of, but I have not gotten one of them to consent to go on paper yet. I think that that stock will still be complete and unimpaired when I finish these memoirs, if I ever finish them. I believe that if I should put in all or any of those incidents I should be sure to strike them out when I came to revise this book.
About twenty-five years ago—somewhere around then—I suggested to Orion that he write an autobiography. I asked him to try to tell the whole truth in it; to not just show himself in a good light, and to honestly include all the events in his life that he found interesting, even the ones that stuck with him because he was embarrassed by them. I said this had never been done before, and if he could pull it off, his autobiography would be a valuable piece of literature. I mentioned I was offering him a project that I couldn't undertake myself, but I would[Pg 344] hope he would succeed with it. I realize now that I was placing an impossible task on him. I've been writing my own autobiography daily for three months; I've thought of fifteen hundred to two thousand moments in my life that I’m ashamed of, but I haven't managed to get a single one on paper yet. I think that collection will still be intact and untouched by the time I finish these memoirs, if I ever do. I believe that if I included any of those incidents, I would definitely strike them out when I went to revise this book.
Orion wrote his autobiography and sent it to me. But great was my disappointment; and my vexation, too. In it he was constantly making a hero of himself, exactly as I should have done and am doing now, and he was constantly forgetting to put in the episodes which placed him in an unheroic light. I knew several incidents of his life which were distinctly and painfully unheroic, but when I came across them in his autobiography they had changed color. They had turned themselves inside out, and were things to be intemperately proud of. In my dissatisfaction I destroyed a considerable part of that autobiography. But in what remains there are passages which are interesting, and I shall quote from them here and there and now and then, as I go along.
Orion wrote his autobiography and sent it to me. But I was really disappointed and frustrated. In it, he constantly painted himself as a hero, exactly how I would have done and how I'm doing now, and he kept forgetting to include the moments that showed him in a less heroic light. I knew several events from his life that were definitely not heroic, but when I found them in his autobiography, they had changed completely. They had been turned inside out and became things he was proudly boasting about. Out of my dissatisfaction, I destroyed a significant portion of that autobiography. But in what’s left, there are interesting passages, and I’ll quote from them here and there as I go along.
While we were living in Vienna in 1898 a cablegram came from Keokuk announcing Orion's death. He was seventy-two years old. He had gone down to the kitchen in the early hours of a bitter December morning; he had built the fire, and had then sat down at a table to write something; and there he died, with the pencil in his hand and resting against the paper in the middle of an unfinished word—an indication that his release from the captivity of a long and troubled and pathetic and unprofitable life was mercifully swift and painless.
While we were living in Vienna in 1898, a telegram arrived from Keokuk announcing Orion's death. He was seventy-two years old. He had gone down to the kitchen early on a harsh December morning; he had built a fire and then sat down at a table to write something. That's where he died, with the pencil in his hand resting against the paper in the middle of an unfinished word—showing that his escape from a long, troubled, sad, and unfulfilling
[Dictated in 1904.] A quarter of a century ago I was visiting John Hay at Whitelaw Reid's house in New York, which Hay was occupying for a few months while Reid was absent on a holiday in Europe. Temporarily also, Hay was editing Reid's paper, the New York "Tribune." I remember two incidents of that Sunday visit particularly well. I had known John Hay a good many years, I had known him when he was an obscure young editorial writer on the "Tribune" in Horace Greely's time,[Pg 345] earning three or four times the salary he got, considering the high character of the work which came from his pen. In those earlier days he was a picture to look at, for beauty of feature, perfection of form and grace of carriage and movement. He had a charm about him of a sort quite unusual to my Western ignorance and inexperience—a charm of manner, intonation, apparently native and unstudied elocution, and all that—the groundwork of it native, the ease of it, the polish of it, the winning naturalness of it, acquired in Europe where he had been Chargé d'Affaires some time at the Court of Vienna. He was joyous and cordial, a most pleasant comrade. One of the two incidents above referred to as marking that visit was this:
[Dictated in 1904.] Twenty-five years ago, I visited John Hay at Whitelaw Reid's house in New York. Hay was staying there for a few months while Reid was on vacation in Europe. He was also temporarily editing Reid's paper, the New York "Tribune." I particularly remember two incidents from that Sunday visit. I had known John Hay for many years; I met him when he was a young, unknown editorial writer at the "Tribune" during Horace Greeley's time, earning three or four times less than he should have, considering the high quality of his work. In those earlier days, he was striking to look at, blessed with beautiful features, perfect form, and graceful movement. He had a charm that was quite unusual for my Western ignorance and inexperience—a unique manner, tone, and seemingly effortless eloquence, all grounded in a naturalness that he polished during his time in Europe, where he served as Chargé d'Affaires at the Court of Vienna. He was lively, warm, and a very enjoyable companion. One of the two incidents I mentioned that marked that visit was this:
In trading remarks concerning our ages I confessed to forty-two and Hay to forty. Then he asked if I had begun to write my autobiography, and I said I hadn't. He said that I ought to begin at once, and that I had already lost two years. Then he said in substance this:
In a conversation about our ages, I admitted to being forty-two and Hay said he was forty. Then he asked if I had started writing my autobiography, and I replied that I hadn’t. He insisted that I should start right away, claiming I had already wasted two years. Then he said basically this:
"At forty a man reaches the top of the hill of life and starts down on the sunset side. The ordinary man, the average man, not to particularize too closely and say the commonplace man, has at that age succeeded or failed; in either case he has lived all of his life that is likely to be worth recording; also in either case the life lived is worth setting down, and cannot fail to be interesting if he comes as near to telling the truth about himself as he can. And he will tell the truth in spite of himself, for his facts and his fictions will work loyally together for the protection of the reader; each fact and each fiction will be a dab of paint, each will fall in its right place, and together they will paint his portrait; not the portrait he thinks they are painting, but his real portrait, the inside of him, the soul of him, his character. Without intending to lie he will lie all the time; not bluntly, consciously, not dully unconsciously, but half-consciously—consciousness in twilight; a soft and gentle and merciful twilight which makes his general form comely, with his virtuous prominences and projections discernible and his ungracious ones in shadow. His truths will be recognizable as truths, his modifications of facts which would tell against him will go for nothing, the reader will see the fact through the film and know his man.
"At forty, a man reaches the peak of life's journey and begins to descend into the later years. The average man, not to specify too closely as to say the typical man, has by that age either succeeded or failed; in either case, he has lived through all of his life that is likely worth mentioning; and in either case, that life is worth documenting, and it can’t help but be interesting if he comes as close as possible to being honest about himself. And he will be honest despite himself, because his facts and fictions will work together for the benefit of the reader; each fact and fiction will be like a stroke of paint, each finding its rightful place, and together they will create his portrait; not the portrait he believes they’re creating, but his true portrait, the essence of him, his soul, his character. Without intending to mislead, he will be misleading all the time; not bluntly or consciously, nor dully or unconsciously, but half-consciously—consciousness in a soft twilight; a gentle and forgiving twilight that shapes his general appearance attractively, with his admirable traits visible and his flaws in shadow. His truths will be identifiable as truths, while his alterations of facts that might work against him will be inconsequential; the reader will see the reality through the veneer and understand who he is."
"There is a subtle devilish something or other about auto[Pg 346]biographical composition that defeats all the writer's attempts to paint his portrait his way."
"There’s a subtle, devilish quality about autobiographical writing that undermines all the writer's efforts to portray his image his way."
Hay meant that he and I were ordinary average commonplace people, and I did not resent my share of the verdict, but nursed my wound in silence. His idea that we had finished our work in life, passed the summit and were westward bound down-hill, with me two years ahead of him and neither of us with anything further to do as benefactors to mankind, was all a mistake. I had written four books then, possibly five. I have been drowning the world in literary wisdom ever since, volume after volume; since that day's sun went down he has been the historian of Mr. Lincoln, and his book will never perish; he has been ambassador, brilliant orator, competent and admirable Secretary of State.
Hay meant that he and I were just regular, everyday people, and I didn’t hold a grudge about my part in the verdict; I just dealt with my hurt quietly. His belief that we had completed our work in life, reached our peak, and were now heading downhill, with me two years ahead of him and neither of us having anything more to offer humanity, was completely wrong. I had written four books by then, maybe five. I've been flooding the world with literary insight ever since, one volume after another; since that day's sun set, he has chronicled Mr. Lincoln's life, and his book will endure forever; he has served as ambassador, been a brilliant speaker, and has been a capable and respected Secretary of State.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCX.
MARCH 1, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XIII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
... As I have said, that vast plot of Tennessee land[6] was held by my father twenty years—intact. When he died in 1847, we began to manage it ourselves. Forty years afterward, we had managed it all away except 10,000 acres, and gotten nothing to remember the sales by. About 1887—possibly it was earlier—the 10,000 went. My brother found a chance to trade it for a house and lot in the town of Corry, in the oil regions of Pennsylvania. About 1894 he sold this property for $250. That ended the Tennessee Land.
... As I mentioned, that huge piece of land in Tennessee[6] was owned by my father for twenty years—completely untouched. When he passed away in 1847, we started managing it ourselves. Forty years later, we had sold almost all of it, leaving us with just 10,000 acres, and we had nothing to show for the sales. Around 1887—maybe it was even earlier—we sold the 10,000 acres. My brother found an opportunity to trade it for a house and lot in the town of Corry, in the oil regions of Pennsylvania. About 1894, he sold this property for $250. That was the end of the Tennessee land.
If any penny of cash ever came out of my father's wise investment but that, I have no recollection of it. No, I am overlooking[Pg 450] a detail. It furnished me a field for Sellers and a book. Out of my half of the book I got $15,000 or $20,000; out of the play I got $75,000 or $80,000—just about a dollar an acre. It is curious: I was not alive when my father made the investment, therefore he was not intending any partiality; yet I was the only member of the family that ever profited by it. I shall have occasion to mention this land again, now and then, as I go along, for it influenced our life in one way or another during more than a generation. Whenever things grew dark it rose and put out its hopeful Sellers hand and cheered us up, and said "Do not be afraid—trust in me—wait." It kept us hoping and hoping, during forty years, and forsook us at last. It put our energies to sleep and made visionaries of us—dreamers and indolent. We were always going to be rich next year—no occasion to work. It is good to begin life poor; it is good to begin life rich—these are wholesome; but to begin it prospectively rich! The man who has not experienced it cannot imagine the curse of it.
If any cash ever came from my father's smart investment besides that, I don't remember it. No, I'm forgetting[Pg 450] one detail. It gave me a plot of land and a book. From my half of the book, I got $15,000 or $20,000; from the play, I got $75,000 or $80,000—just about a dollar an acre. It's strange: I wasn’t alive when my father made the investment, so he wasn't being biased; yet I was the only family member who ever benefited from it. I’ll mention this land again from time to time as I go along, because it influenced our lives in one way or another for over a generation. Whenever things got tough, it rose up and offered its reassuring hand, telling us, "Don’t be afraid—trust me—wait." It kept us hopeful during forty years and ultimately let us down. It made us lazy and turned us into dreamers. We always thought we’d be rich next year—no need to work. Starting life poor is good; starting life rich is good—these are healthy experiences. But starting life with the *prospect* of being rich? Only someone who has lived it can truly understand the burden of that.
My parents removed to Missouri in the early thirties; I do not remember just when, for I was not born then, and cared nothing for such things. It was a long journey in those days, and must have been a rough and tiresome one. The home was made in the wee village of Florida, in Monroe county, and I was born there in 1835. The village contained a hundred people and I increased the population by one per cent. It is more than the best man in history ever did for any other town. It may not be modest in me to refer to this, but it is true. There is no record of a person doing as much—not even Shakespeare. But I did it for Florida, and it shows that I could have done it for any place—even London, I suppose.
My parents moved to Missouri in the early thirties; I don't remember exactly when, since I wasn't born yet and didn't care about such things. It was a long journey back then, and it must have been rough and tiring. They settled in the small village of Florida, in Monroe County, and I was born there in 1835. The village had about a hundred people, and I increased the population by one percent. That's more than any great person in history has done for any other town. I might not be humble for bringing this up, but it's true. There’s no record of anyone achieving that—not even Shakespeare. But I did it for Florida, which proves I could have done it for any place—even London, I suppose.
Recently some one in Missouri has sent me a picture of the house I was born in. Heretofore I have always stated that it was a palace, but I shall be more guarded, now.
Recently, someone in Missouri sent me a picture of the house I was born in. Until now, I’ve always said it was a palace, but I will be more careful with my words from now on.
I remember only one circumstance connected with my life in it. I remember it very well, though I was but two and a half years old at the time. The family packed up everything and started in wagons for Hannibal, on the Mississippi, thirty miles away. Toward night, when they camped and counted up the children, one was missing. I was the one. I had been left behind. Parents ought always to count the children before they start. I was having a good enough time playing by myself until I found that the[Pg 451] doors were fastened and that there was a grisly deep silence brooding over the place. I knew, then, that the family were gone, and that they had forgotten me. I was well frightened, and I made all the noise I could, but no one was near and it did no good. I spent the afternoon in captivity and was not rescued until the gloaming had fallen and the place was alive with ghosts.
I only remember one thing from my life back then. I remember it really well, even though I was just two and a half years old at the time. The family packed everything up and set off in wagons for Hannibal, on the Mississippi, thirty miles away. By evening, when they stopped to camp and counted the kids, one was missing. That was me. I had been left behind. Parents should always check for their kids before they leave. I was having a good enough time playing by myself until I realized that the[Pg 451] doors were locked and a creepy silence hung over the place. Then I understood that my family was gone and they had forgotten me. I was really scared, and I made as much noise as I could, but no one was around, and it didn’t help. I spent the afternoon alone, and I wasn’t rescued until dusk had fallen and the place felt haunted.
My brother Henry was six months old at that time. I used to remember his walking into a fire outdoors when he was a week old. It was remarkable in me to remember a thing like that, which occurred when I was so young. And it was still more remarkable that I should cling to the delusion, for thirty years, that I did remember it—for of course it never happened; he would not have been able to walk at that age. If I had stopped to reflect, I should not have burdened my memory with that impossible rubbish so long. It is believed by many people that an impression deposited in a child's memory within the first two years of its life cannot remain there five years, but that is an error. The incident of Benvenuto Cellini and the salamander must be accepted as authentic and trustworthy; and then that remarkable and indisputable instance in the experience of Helen Keller—however, I will speak of that at another time. For many years I believed that I remembered helping my grandfather drink his whiskey toddy when I was six weeks old, but I do not tell about that any more, now; I am grown old, and my memory is not as active as it used to be. When I was younger I could remember anything, whether it had happened or not; but my faculties are decaying, now, and soon I shall be so I cannot remember any but the things that happened. It is sad to go to pieces like this, but we all have to do it.
My brother Henry was six months old at that time. I used to remember him walking into a fire outside when he was just a week old. It’s surprising that I could recall something like that from such a young age. Even more surprising is that I clung to the belief for thirty years that I actually remembered it—because, of course, it never happened; he wouldn’t have been able to walk at that age. If I had taken a moment to think about it, I wouldn’t have filled my memory with that impossible nonsense for so long. Many people believe that anything a child remembers in the first two years of life can't last for five years, but that’s a misconception. The story of Benvenuto Cellini and the salamander should be regarded as genuine and reliable; and then there’s the remarkable and undeniable case of Helen Keller—though I’ll talk about that another time. For many years, I thought I remembered helping my grandfather drink his whiskey toddy when I was six weeks old, but I don’t mention that anymore; I’m older now, and my memory isn’t as sharp as it once was. When I was younger, I could remember anything, whether it really happened or not; but now my abilities are fading, and soon I’ll only be able to recall the things that actually happened. It’s sad to break down like this, but we all have to go through it.
My uncle, John A. Quarles, was a farmer, and his place was in the country four miles from Florida. He had eight children, and fifteen or twenty negroes, and was also fortunate in other ways. Particularly in his character. I have not come across a better man than he was. I was his guest for two or three months every year, from the fourth year after we removed to Hannibal till I was eleven or twelve years old. I have never consciously used him or his wife in a book, but his farm has come very handy to me in literature, once or twice. In "Huck Finn" and in "Tom Sawyer Detective" I moved it down to Arkansas. It was all of six hundred miles, but it was no trouble, it was not a very[Pg 452] large farm; five hundred acres, perhaps, but I could have done it if it had been twice as large. And as for the morality of it, I cared nothing for that; I would move a State if the exigencies of literature required it.
My uncle, John A. Quarles, was a farmer, and his place was in the countryside four miles from Florida. He had eight kids and around fifteen to twenty African American workers, and he was also lucky in other aspects. Especially in his character. I haven't met a better man than him. I stayed with him for two or three months every year, starting from the fourth year after we moved to Hannibal until I was about eleven or twelve years old. I've never intentionally used him or his wife in a book, but his farm has come in handy for me in literature a couple of times. In "Huck Finn" and in "Tom Sawyer Detective," I moved it down to Arkansas. It was a good six hundred miles away, but it wasn't difficult; it wasn't a very[Pg 452] large farm—maybe five hundred acres. I could have done it even if it were twice that size. As for the ethics of it, I didn't care at all; I would change a state if the needs of literature required it.
It was a heavenly place for a boy, that farm of my uncle John's. The house was a double log one, with a spacious floor (roofed in) connecting it with the kitchen. In the summer the table was set in the middle of that shady and breezy floor, and the sumptuous meals—well, it makes me cry to think of them. Fried chicken, roast pig, wild and tame turkeys, ducks and geese; venison just killed; squirrels, rabbits, pheasants, partridges, prairie-chickens; biscuits, hot batter cakes, hot buckwheat cakes, hot "wheat bread," hot rolls, hot corn pone; fresh corn boiled on the ear, succotash, butter-beans, string-beans, tomatoes, pease, Irish potatoes, sweet-potatoes; buttermilk, sweet milk, "clabber"; watermelons, musk-melons, cantaloups—all fresh from the garden—apple pie, peach pie, pumpkin pie, apple dumplings, peach cobbler—I can't remember the rest. The way that the things were cooked was perhaps the main splendor—particularly a certain few of the dishes. For instance, the corn bread, the hot biscuits and wheat bread, and the fried chicken. These things have never been properly cooked in the North—in fact, no one there is able to learn the art, so far as my experience goes. The North thinks it knows how to make corn bread, but this is gross superstition. Perhaps no bread in the world is quite as good as Southern corn bread, and perhaps no bread in the world is quite so bad as the Northern imitation of it. The North seldom tries to fry chicken, and this is well; the art cannot be learned north of the line of Mason and Dixon, nor anywhere in Europe. This is not hearsay; it is experience that is speaking. In Europe it is imagined that the custom of serving various kinds of bread blazing hot is "American," but that is too broad a spread; it is custom in the South, but is much less than that in the North. In the North and in Europe hot bread is considered unhealthy. This is probably another fussy superstition, like the European superstition that ice-water is unhealthy. Europe does not need ice-water, and does not drink it; and yet, notwithstanding this, its word for it is better than ours, because it describes it, whereas ours doesn't. Europe calls it "iced" water. Our word describes water made from melted ice—a drink which we have but little acquaintance with.
It was a perfect place for a boy, that farm of my uncle John's. The house was a two-story log cabin, with a large screened-in porch connecting it to the kitchen. In the summer, we set the table in the middle of that shady, breezy porch, and the amazing meals—well, it brings tears to my eyes just thinking about them. Fried chicken, roast pig, wild and domestic turkeys, ducks and geese; fresh venison; squirrels, rabbits, pheasants, partridges, prairie chickens; biscuits, hot pancakes, hot buckwheat cakes, rolls, corn bread; fresh corn on the cob, succotash, butter beans, green beans, tomatoes, peas, Irish potatoes, sweet potatoes; buttermilk, sweet milk, clabber; watermelons, musk melons, cantaloupes—all fresh from the garden—apple pie, peach pie, pumpkin pie, apple dumplings, peach cobbler—I can't remember the rest. The way everything was cooked was probably the main highlight—especially a few specific dishes. For example, the cornbread, hot biscuits and wheat bread, and fried chicken. These dishes have never been cooked properly up North—in fact, no one there seems to be able to master the technique, from what I can tell. The North is convinced it knows how to make cornbread, but that's a big misconception. Perhaps no bread in the world is as good as Southern cornbread, and no bread is as bad as the Northern version. The North rarely attempts to fry chicken, and honestly, that's for the best; the skill can't be learned north of the Mason-Dixon line or anywhere in Europe. This isn’t just hearsay; it comes from experience. In Europe, people assume that serving different kinds of hot bread is an "American" thing, but that's a broad generalization; it’s a tradition in the South, but not as common in the North. In the North and in Europe, hot bread is thought to be unhealthy. This is likely another silly superstition, like the European belief that drinking ice water is bad for you. Europe doesn't need ice water and doesn't drink it; yet, despite that, their term for it is better than ours because it describes it accurately, whereas ours doesn’t. They call it "iced" water. Our term refers to water made from melted ice—a drink we're not very familiar with.
[Pg 453]It seem a pity that the world should throw away so many good things merely because they are unwholesome. I doubt if God has given us any refreshment which, taken in moderation, is unwholesome, except microbes. Yet there are people who strictly deprive themselves of each and every eatable, drinkable and smokable which has in any way acquired a shady reputation. They pay this price for health. And health is all they get for it. How strange it is; it is like paying out your whole fortune for a cow that has gone dry.
[Pg 453]It seems unfortunate that the world discards so many good things just because they have a bad reputation. I doubt that God has given us any refreshment that is unhealthy when consumed in moderation, except for germs. Yet there are people who completely deny themselves all foods, drinks, and smoking products that have any sort of questionable reputation. They pay this price for health. And health is all they achieve in return. How strange that is; it’s like spending your entire fortune on a cow that no longer gives milk.
The farmhouse stood in the middle of a very large yard, and the yard was fenced on three sides with rails and on the rear side with high palings; against these stood the smokehouse; beyond the palings was the orchard; beyond the orchard were the negro quarter and the tobacco-fields. The front yard was entered over a stile, made of sawed-off logs of graduated heights; I do not remember any gate. In a corner of the front yard were a dozen lofty hickory-trees and a dozen black-walnuts, and in the nutting season riches were to be gathered there.
The farmhouse was in the middle of a huge yard, which was fenced on three sides with rails and had tall wooden panels at the back; next to these was the smokehouse. Beyond the panels lay the orchard; past the orchard were the workers’ quarters and the tobacco fields. You entered the front yard through a set of steps made of cut logs of different heights; I don’t recall there being a gate. In one corner of the front yard were a dozen tall hickory trees and a dozen black walnut trees, and during nutting season, you could gather a lot of riches there.
Down a piece, abreast the house, stood a little log cabin against the rail fence; and there the woody hill fell sharply away, past the barns, the corn-crib, the stables and the tobacco-curing house, to a limpid brook which sang along over its gravelly bed and curved and frisked in and out and here and there and yonder in the deep shade of overhanging foliage and vines—a divine place for wading, and it had swimming-pools, too, which were forbidden to us and therefore much frequented by us. For we were little Christian children, and had early been taught the value of forbidden fruit.
Down the way, alongside the house, there was a small log cabin against the rail fence; and there the wooded hill dropped steeply, past the barns, the corn crib, the stables, and the tobacco-curing shed, to a clear brook that babbled over its gravelly bed and twisted and turned in and out of the deep shade provided by the overhanging trees and vines—a perfect spot for wading, and it even had swimming holes, which were off-limits to us but thus became very popular. We were little Christian kids, and we had been taught early on that forbidden fruit was the sweetest.
In the little log cabin lived a bedridden white-headed slave woman whom we visited daily, and looked upon with awe, for we believed she was upwards of a thousand years old and had talked with Moses. The younger negroes credited these statistics, and had furnished them to us in good faith. We accommodated all the details which came to us about her; and so we believed that she had lost her health in the long desert trip coming out of Egypt, and had never been able to get it back again. She had a round bald place on the crown of her head, and we used to creep around and gaze at it in reverent silence, and reflect that it was caused by fright through seeing Pharaoh drowned. We called her "Aunt" Hannah, Southern fashion.[Pg 454] She was superstitious like the other negroes; also, like them, she was deeply religious. Like them, she had great faith in prayer, and employed it in all ordinary exigencies, but not in cases where a dead certainty of result was urgent. Whenever witches were around she tied up the remnant of her wool in little tufts, with white thread, and this promptly made the witches impotent.
In the small log cabin lived a bedridden elderly white-haired woman whom we visited daily and viewed with awe, believing she was over a thousand years old and had spoken with Moses. The younger black folks believed these stories and shared them with us sincerely. We accepted all the details we heard about her, convinced that she had lost her health during the long journey out of Egypt and had never regained it. She had a round bald spot on the top of her head, and we would quietly gather around and look at it in reverent silence, thinking it was caused by the shock of seeing Pharaoh drown. We called her "Aunt" Hannah, in true Southern style.[Pg 454] She was superstitious like the other black folks; also, like them, she was deeply religious. Like them, she had great faith in prayer and used it for everyday problems, but not in situations where a guaranteed result was crucial. Whenever witches were nearby, she would tie up her leftover wool in little bunches with white thread, which quickly rendered the witches powerless.
All the negroes were friends of ours, and with those of our own age we were in effect comrades. I say in effect, using the phrase as a modification. We were comrades, and yet not comrades; color and condition interposed a subtle line which both parties were conscious of, and which rendered complete fusion impossible. We had a faithful and affectionate good friend, ally and adviser in "Uncle Dan'l," a middle-aged slave whose head was the best one in the negro quarter, whose sympathies were wide and warm, and whose heart was honest and simple and knew no guile. He has served me well, these many, many years. I have not seen him for more than half a century, and yet spiritually I have had his welcome company a good part of that time, and have staged him in books under his own name and as "Jim," and carted him all around—to Hannibal, down the Mississippi on a raft, and even across the Desert of Sahara in a balloon—and he has endured it all with the patience and friendliness and loyalty which were his birthright. It was on the farm that I got my strong liking for his race and my appreciation of certain of its fine qualities. This feeling and this estimate have stood the test of sixty years and more and have suffered no impairment. The black face is as welcome to me now as it was then.
All the Black people were our friends, and with those our age, we were basically comrades. I say "basically" to tweak the meaning a bit. We were comrades, yet also not quite comrades; race and social status created a subtle divide that both sides felt aware of, making complete unity impossible. We had a loyal and caring friend, ally, and mentor in "Uncle Dan'l," a middle-aged man who was the wisest in the Black community, whose empathy was broad and heartfelt, and whose honesty was straightforward without any deceit. He has been a great support to me for so many years. I haven’t seen him in over fifty years, yet spiritually, I’ve felt his comforting presence for much of that time, and I've featured him in my books under his own name and as "Jim," taking him all over—from Hannibal, down the Mississippi on a raft, and even across the Sahara in a balloon—and he has handled it all with the patience, kindness, and loyalty that were naturally his. It was on the farm that I developed my deep appreciation for his race and recognized some of its admirable qualities. This feeling and assessment have endured for over sixty years without losing strength. The Black face is just as welcomed to me now as it was back then.
In my schoolboy days I had no aversion to slavery. I was not aware that there was anything wrong about it. No one arraigned it in my hearing; the local papers said nothing against it; the local pulpit taught us that God approved it, that it was a holy thing, and that the doubter need only look in the Bible if he wished to settle his mind—and then the texts were read aloud to us to make the matter sure; if the slaves themselves had an aversion to slavery they were wise and said nothing. In Hannibal we seldom saw a slave misused; on the farm, never.
In my school days, I didn't have any problem with slavery. I wasn’t aware that it was wrong. No one criticized it around me; the local newspapers didn’t speak out against it; the local church taught us that God approved of it, that it was a sacred thing, and those who doubted only needed to look in the Bible to clear their minds—and then the relevant verses were read to us to reinforce the idea; if the slaves themselves disliked slavery, they were smart enough to keep quiet about it. In Hannibal, we rarely saw a slave mistreated; on the farm, never.
There was, however, one small incident of my boyhood days which touched this matter, and it must have meant a good deal to me or it would not have stayed in my memory, clear and sharp, vivid and shadowless, all these slow-drifting years. We had a[Pg 455] little slave boy whom we had hired from some one, there in Hannibal. He was from the Eastern Shore of Maryland, and had been brought away from his family and his friends, half-way across the American continent, and sold. He was a cheery spirit, innocent and gentle, and the noisiest creature that ever was, perhaps. All day long he was singing, whistling, yelling, whooping, laughing—it was maddening, devastating, unendurable. At last, one day, I lost all my temper, and went raging to my mother, and said Sandy had been singing for an hour without a single break, and I couldn't stand it, and wouldn't she please shut him up. The tears came into her eyes, and her lip trembled, and she said something like this—
There was, however, one small incident from my childhood that related to this matter, and it must have meant a lot to me or it wouldn’t have stayed in my memory, clear and sharp, vivid and shadowless, all these slowly drifting years. We had a[Pg 455] little boy we hired as a slave from someone in Hannibal. He was from the Eastern Shore of Maryland, and had been taken away from his family and friends, halfway across the country, and sold. He had a cheerful spirit, was innocent and gentle, and maybe the noisiest creature ever. All day long he was singing, whistling, yelling, whooping, laughing—it was maddening, exhausting, unbearable. Finally, one day, I lost my temper completely, went storming to my mother, and said Sandy had been singing for an hour without a single break, and I couldn’t take it anymore, and wouldn't she please make him stop. Tears welled up in her eyes, her lip trembled, and she said something like this—
"Poor thing, when he sings, it shows that he is not remembering, and that comforts me; but when he is still, I am afraid he is thinking, and I cannot bear it. He will never see his mother again; if he can sing, I must not hinder it, but be thankful for it. If you were older, you would understand me; then that friendless child's noise would make you glad."
"Poor thing, when he sings, it shows that he's not remembering, and that makes me feel better; but when he's quiet, I'm scared he's thinking, and I can't stand it. He will never see his mother again; if he can sing, I shouldn’t stop him, but rather be grateful for it. If you were older, you would get what I mean; then that lonely child's noise would make you happy."
It was a simple speech, and made up of small words, but it went home, and Sandy's noise was not a trouble to me any more. She never used large words, but she had a natural gift for making small ones do effective work. She lived to reach the neighborhood of ninety years, and was capable with her tongue to the last—especially when a meanness or an injustice roused her spirit. She has come handy to me several times in my books, where she figures as Tom Sawyer's "Aunt Polly." I fitted her out with a dialect, and tried to think up other improvements for her, but did not find any. I used Sandy once, also; it was in "Tom Sawyer"; I tried to get him to whitewash the fence, but it did not work. I do not remember what name I called him by in the book.
It was a straightforward speech, made up of simple words, but it hit home, and Sandy's noise didn't bother me anymore. She never used big words, but she had a natural talent for making small ones very effective. She lived to nearly ninety and was sharp with her words right up until the end—especially when something unfair or mean stirred her up. She’s come in handy for me a few times in my books, where she shows up as Tom Sawyer's "Aunt Polly." I gave her a specific dialect and tried to think of other ways to improve her character, but didn't come up with anything. I also used Sandy once in "Tom Sawyer"; I tried to get him to whitewash the fence, but it didn't work. I don't remember what name I gave him in the book.
I can see the farm yet, with perfect clearness. I can see all its belongings, all its details; the family room of the house, with a "trundle" bed in one corner and a spinning-wheel in another—a wheel whose rising and falling wail, heard from a distance, was the mournfulest of all sounds to me, and made me homesick and low-spirited, and filled my atmosphere with the wandering spirits of the dead: the vast fireplace, piled high, on winter nights, with flaming hickory logs from whose ends a sugary sap bubbled out but did not go to waste, for we scraped it[Pg 456] off and ate it; the lazy cat spread out on the rough hearthstones, the drowsy dogs braced against the jambs and blinking; my aunt in one chimney-corner knitting, my uncle in the other smoking his corn-cob pipe; the slick and carpetless oak floor faintly mirroring the dancing flame-tongues and freckled with black indentations where fire-coals had popped out and died a leisurely death; half a dozen children romping in the background twilight; "split"-bottomed chairs here and there, some with rockers; a cradle—out of service, but waiting, with confidence; in the early cold mornings a snuggle of children, in shirts and chemises, occupying the hearthstone and procrastinating—they could not bear to leave that comfortable place and go out on the wind-swept floor-space between the house and kitchen where the general tin basin stood, and wash.
I can still see the farm clearly. I can picture all its belongings and details; the family room of the house, with a trundle bed in one corner and a spinning wheel in another—a wheel whose rising and falling wail, heard from a distance, was the saddest sound to me, making me feel homesick and low, filling the air with the wandering spirits of the dead: the huge fireplace, stacked high on winter nights with flaming hickory logs, from which sweet sap bubbled out but didn’t go to waste because we scraped it off and ate it; the lazy cat sprawled out on the rough hearthstones, the sleepy dogs leaning against the doorframes, blinking; my aunt knitting in one corner of the fireplace, my uncle smoking his corn-cob pipe in the other; the smooth, bare oak floor faintly reflecting the dancing flames, speckled with black marks where fire-coals had popped out and slowly extinguished; half a dozen kids playing in the dim light; "split"-bottom chairs scattered around, some with rockers; a cradle—out of service, but waiting patiently; on early cold mornings, a bunch of kids in shirts and chemises occupying the hearthstone and stalling—they couldn’t bear to leave that cozy spot and go out onto the windy floor space between the house and kitchen where the large tin basin stood, ready for washing.
Along outside of the front fence ran the country road; dusty in the summer-time, and a good place for snakes—they liked to lie in it and sun themselves; when they were rattlesnakes or puff adders, we killed them: when they were black snakes, or racers, or belonged to the fabled "hoop" breed, we fled, without shame; when they were "house snakes" or "garters" we carried them home and put them in Aunt Patsy's work-basket for a surprise; for she was prejudiced against snakes, and always when she took the basket in her lap and they began to climb out of it it disordered her mind. She never could seem to get used to them; her opportunities went for nothing. And she was always cold toward bats, too, and could not bear them; and yet I think a bat is as friendly a bird as there is. My mother was Aunt Patsy's sister, and had the same wild superstitions. A bat is beautifully soft and silky: I do not know any creature that is pleasanter to the touch, or is more grateful for caressings, if offered in the right spirit. I know all about these coleoptera, because our great cave, three miles below Hannibal, was multitudinously stocked with them, and often I brought them home to amuse my mother with. It was easy to manage if it was a school day, because then I had ostensibly been to school and hadn't any bats. She was not a suspicious person, but full of trust and confidence; and when I said "There's something in my coat pocket for you," she would put her hand in. But she always took it out again, herself; I didn't have to tell her. It was remarkable, the way she couldn't learn to like private bats.
Along the front fence, there was the country road; dusty in the summer, and a great spot for snakes—they liked to lay in it and sunbathe; when they were rattlesnakes or puff adders, we killed them. When they were black snakes, racers, or part of the legendary "hoop" breed, we ran away without shame. When they were "house snakes" or "garter snakes," we brought them home and put them in Aunt Patsy's workbasket as a surprise; she had a strong dislike for snakes, and whenever she took the basket in her lap and they started to crawl out, it really confused her. She could never seem to get used to them; her chances to change her mind went to waste. She was also cold towards bats and couldn't stand them; yet, I think a bat is one of the friendliest creatures around. My mother was Aunt Patsy's sister and shared similar wild superstitions. A bat is incredibly soft and silky: I don’t know any creature that feels better to touch or appreciates being petted more, if given in the right spirit. I know all about these beetles because our big cave, three miles below Hannibal, was full of them, and I often brought them home to entertain my mother. It was easy to pull off on school days since I could claim I’d been to school and didn’t have any bats. She wasn’t a suspicious person, but was full of trust and confidence; when I said, "There's something in my coat pocket for you," she would reach in. But she always took it out herself; I didn’t have to say a word. It was amazing how she couldn’t learn to like private bats.
[Pg 457]I think she was never in the cave in her life; but everybody else went there. Many excursion parties came from considerable distances up and down the river to visit the cave. It was miles in extent, and was a tangled wilderness of narrow and lofty clefts and passages. It was an easy place to get lost in; anybody could do it—including the bats. I got lost in it myself, along with a lady, and our last candle burned down to almost nothing before we glimpsed the search-party's lights winding about in the distance.
[Pg 457]I don't think she ever went into the cave; everyone else did. Many groups traveled from far and wide along the river to check it out. The cave stretched for miles and was a tangled maze of narrow, high crevices and passages. It was easy to get lost in there; anyone could, even the bats. I got lost in it myself with a woman, and our last candle was almost gone before we saw the search party's lights flickering in the distance.
"Injun Joe" the half-breed got lost in there once, and would have starved to death if the bats had run short. But there was no chance of that; there were myriads of them. He told me all his story. In the book called "Tom Sawyer" I starved him entirely to death in the cave, but that was in the interest of art; it never happened. "General" Gaines, who was our first town drunkard before Jimmy Finn got the place, was lost in there for the space of a week, and finally pushed his handkerchief out of a hole in a hilltop near Saverton, several miles down the river from the cave's mouth, and somebody saw it and dug him out. There is nothing the matter with his statistics except the handkerchief. I knew him for years, and he hadn't any. But it could have been his nose. That would attract attention.
"Injun Joe," the mixed-race guy, once got lost in there and would have starved to death if the bats hadn’t been around. But that wasn’t a problem; there were thousands of them. He told me his whole story. In the book called "Tom Sawyer," I completely starved him to death in the cave, but that was just for the story; it never actually happened. "General" Gaines, who was our first town drunk before Jimmy Finn took over, got lost in there for a week and finally pushed his handkerchief out of a hole in a hilltop near Saverton, several miles downriver from the cave's entrance, and someone saw it and dug him out. There's nothing wrong with his statistics except for the handkerchief. I knew him for years, and he didn’t have one. But it could have been his nose. That would definitely get attention.
Beyond the road where the snakes sunned themselves was a dense young thicket, and through it a dim-lighted path led a quarter of a mile; then out of the dimness one emerged abruptly upon a level great prairie which was covered with wild strawberry-plants, vividly starred with prairie pinks, and walled in on all sides by forests. The strawberries were fragrant and fine, and in the season we were generally there in the crisp freshness of the early morning, while the dew-beads still sparkled upon the grass and the woods were ringing with the first songs of the birds.
Beyond the road where the snakes basked in the sun was a thick young thicket, and through it a dimly lit path stretched a quarter of a mile; then, out of the darkness, you suddenly found yourself on a wide prairie covered with wild strawberry plants, brightly speckled with prairie pinks, and surrounded on all sides by forests. The strawberries were fragrant and delicious, and during the season, we usually arrived in the crisp freshness of early morning, while the dew beads still sparkled on the grass and the woods echoed with the first songs of the birds.
Down the forest slopes to the left were the swings. They were made of bark stripped from hickory saplings. When they became dry they were dangerous. They usually broke when a child was forty feet in the air, and this was why so many bones had to be mended every year. I had no ill-luck myself, but none of my cousins escaped. There were eight of them, and at one time and another they broke fourteen arms among them. But it cost next to nothing, for the doctor worked by the year—$25 for the whole family. I remember two of the Florida doctors, Chowning and Meredith. They not only tended an entire family for $25 a year,[Pg 458] but furnished the medicines themselves. Good measure, too. Only the largest persons could hold a whole dose. Castor-oil was the principal beverage. The dose was half a dipperful, with half a dipperful of New Orleans molasses added to help it down and make it taste good, which it never did. The next standby was calomel; the next, rhubarb; and the next, jalap. Then they bled the patient, and put mustard-plasters on him. It was a dreadful system, and yet the death-rate was not heavy. The calomel was nearly sure to salivate the patient and cost him some of his teeth. There were no dentists. When teeth became touched with decay or were otherwise ailing, the doctor knew of but one thing to do: he fetched his tongs and dragged them out. If the jaw remained, it was not his fault.
Down the forest slopes to the left were the swings. They were made from bark stripped off hickory saplings. When they dried out, they became dangerous. They usually broke when a child was forty feet in the air, which is why so many bones needed mending every year. I didn't have any bad luck myself, but none of my cousins got through unscathed. There were eight of them, and at one time or another, they broke fourteen arms among them. But it didn’t cost much because the doctor worked by the year—$25 for the whole family. I remember two of the Florida doctors, Chowning and Meredith. They not only took care of an entire family for $25 a year, [Pg 458] but also provided the medicines themselves. Good portions, too. Only the largest people could swallow a whole dose. Castor oil was the main remedy. The dose was half a dipperful, with half a dipperful of New Orleans molasses added to help it go down and make it taste better, which it never did. The next standby was calomel; after that, rhubarb; and then jalap. Then they would bleed the patient and put mustard plasters on him. It was a terrible system, and yet the death rate wasn’t high. The calomel was almost sure to make the patient drool and lose some of his teeth. There were no dentists. When teeth got decayed or otherwise painful, the doctor knew of only one way to deal with it: he would bring out his tongs and pull them out. If the jaw was left behind, it wasn’t his fault.
Doctors were not called, in cases of ordinary illness; the family's grandmother attended to those. Every old woman was a doctor, and gathered her own medicines in the woods, and knew how to compound doses that would stir the vitals of a cast-iron dog. And then there was the "Indian doctor"; a grave savage, remnant of his tribe, deeply read in the mysteries of nature and the secret properties of herbs; and most backwoodsmen had high faith in his powers and could tell of wonderful cures achieved by him. In Mauritius, away off yonder in the solitudes of the Indian Ocean, there is a person who answers to our Indian doctor of the old times. He is a negro, and has had no teaching as a doctor, yet there is one disease which he is master of and can cure, and the doctors can't. They send for him when they have a case. It is a child's disease of a strange and deadly sort, and the negro cures it with a herb medicine which he makes, himself, from a prescription which has come down to him from his father and grandfather. He will not let any one see it. He keeps the secret of its components to himself, and it is feared that he will die without divulging it; then there will be consternation in Mauritius. I was told these things by the people there, in 1896.
Doctors weren't called for regular illnesses; the grandmother of the family took care of those. Every older woman acted as a doctor, gathering her own medicines in the woods and knowing how to mix doses that could revive even a cast-iron dog. Then there was the "Indian doctor," a serious man, a remnant of his tribe, well-versed in the mysteries of nature and the hidden properties of herbs; most backwoodsmen had great faith in his abilities and could recount amazing cures he performed. In Mauritius, far out there in the Indian Ocean, there's someone who resembles our old-time Indian doctor. He's a Black man with no formal medical training, yet he excels at curing one particular disease that other doctors can't. They call for him when they encounter a case. It's a child's disease, odd and lethal, and he treats it with a herbal remedy he creates himself, based on a recipe passed down from his father and grandfather. He won't let anyone see it. He keeps the ingredients a secret, and there's a worry that he might take that secret to his grave; if that happens, there would be a panic in Mauritius. I heard all this from the locals back in 1896.
We had the "faith doctor," too, in those early days—a woman. Her specialty was toothache. She was a farmer's old wife, and lived five miles from Hannibal. She would lay her hand on the patient's jaw and say "Believe!" and the cure was prompt. Mrs. Utterback. I remember her very well. Twice I rode out there behind my mother, horseback, and saw the cure performed. My mother was the patient.
We also had the "faith doctor" back then—a woman. Her specialty was treating toothaches. She was the wife of a farmer and lived five miles from Hannibal. She would place her hand on the patient's jaw and say "Believe!" and the cure would happen quickly. Mrs. Utterback. I remember her well. I rode out there twice with my mother on horseback and witnessed the treatment firsthand. My mother was the patient.
[Pg 459]Dr. Meredith removed to Hannibal, by and by, and was our family physician there, and saved my life several times. Still, he was a good man and meant well. Let it go.
[Pg 459]Dr. Meredith moved to Hannibal eventually and became our family doctor there, saving my life several times. Still, he was a good guy and had good intentions. Let it go.
I was always told that I was a sickly and precarious and tiresome and uncertain child, and lived mainly on allopathic medicines during the first seven years of my life. I asked my mother about this, in her old age—she was in her 88th year—and said:
I was always told that I was a sickly, fragile, exhausting, and uncertain child, and I mainly relied on conventional medicine during the first seven years of my life. I asked my mother about this in her old age—she was 88 years old—and said:
"I suppose that during all that time you were uneasy about me?"
"I guess you were worried about me the whole time?"
"Yes, the whole time."
"Yeah, the whole time."
"Afraid I wouldn't live?"
"Afraid I wouldn't survive?"
After a reflective pause—ostensibly to think out the facts—
After a thoughtful pause—seemingly to sort through the details—
"No—afraid you would."
"No—worried you would."
It sounds like a plagiarism, but it probably wasn't. The country schoolhouse was three miles from my uncle's farm. It stood in a clearing in the woods, and would hold about twenty-five boys and girls. We attended the school with more or less regularity once or twice a week, in summer, walking to it in the cool of the morning by the forest paths, and back in the gloaming at the end of the day. All the pupils brought their dinners in baskets—corn-dodger, buttermilk and other good things—and sat in the shade of the trees at noon and ate them. It is the part of my education which I look back upon with the most satisfaction. My first visit to the school was when I was seven. A strapping girl of fifteen, in the customary sunbonnet and calico dress, asked me if I "used tobacco"—meaning did I chew it. I said, no. It roused her scorn. She reported me to all the crowd, and said—
It might sound like plagiarism, but it probably wasn’t. The country school was three miles from my uncle’s farm. It was located in a clearing in the woods and could fit about twenty-five boys and girls. We went to the school fairly regularly once or twice a week during the summer, walking there in the cool of the morning along the forest paths and back in the dusk at the end of the day. All the students brought their lunches in baskets—cornbread, buttermilk, and other good stuff—and sat in the shade of the trees at noon to eat. This is the part of my education that I remember most fondly. My first visit to the school was when I was seven. A tall girl of fifteen, wearing the usual sunbonnet and calico dress, asked me if I "used tobacco"—meaning did I chew it. I said no. This earned me her scorn. She told everyone, saying—
"Here is a boy seven years old who can't chaw tobacco."
"Here is a seven-year-old boy who can't chew tobacco."
By the looks and comments which this produced, I realized that I was a degraded object; I was cruelly ashamed of myself. I determined to reform. But I only made myself sick; I was not able to learn to chew tobacco. I learned to smoke fairly well, but that did not conciliate anybody, and I remained a poor thing, and characterless. I longed to be respected, but I never was able to rise. Children have but little charity for each other's defects.
By the looks and comments that followed, I realized I was a worthless object; I felt deeply ashamed of myself. I decided to change. But I only made myself feel worse; I couldn't learn to chew tobacco. I learned to smoke reasonably well, but that didn't win anyone over, and I remained a nobody without character. I craved respect, but I could never elevate myself. Kids have very little compassion for each other's flaws.
As I have said, I spent some part of every year at the farm until I was twelve or thirteen years old. The life which I led there with my cousins was full of charm, and so is the memory of it yet. I can call back the solemn twilight and mystery of the[Pg 460] deep woods, the earthy smells, the faint odors of the wild flowers, the sheen of rain-washed foliage, the rattling clatter of drops when the wind shook the trees, the far-off hammering of woodpeckers and the muffled drumming of wood-pheasants in the remoteness of the forest, the snap-shot glimpses of disturbed wild creatures skurrying through the grass,—I can call it all back and make it as real as it ever was, and as blessed. I can call back the prairie, and its loneliness and peace, and a vast hawk hanging motionless in the sky, with his wings spread wide and the blue of the vault showing through the fringe of their end-feathers. I can see the woods in their autumn dress, the oaks purple, the hickories washed with gold, the maples and the sumacs luminous with crimson fires, and I can hear the rustle made by the fallen leaves as we ploughed through them. I can see the blue clusters of wild grapes hanging amongst the foliage of the saplings, and I remember the taste of them and the smell. I know how the wild blackberries looked, and how they tasted; and the same with the pawpaws, the hazelnuts and the persimmons; and I can feel the thumping rain, upon my head, of hickory-nuts and walnuts when we were out in the frosty dawn to scramble for them with the pigs, and the gusts of wind loosed them and sent them down. I know the stain of blackberries, and how pretty it is; and I know the stain of walnut hulls, and how little it minds soap and water; also what grudged experience it had of either of them. I know the taste of maple sap, and when to gather it, and how to arrange the troughs and the delivery tubes, and how to boil down the juice, and how to hook the sugar after it is made; also how much better hooked sugar tastes than any that is honestly come by, let bigots say what they will. I know how a prize watermelon looks when it is sunning its fat rotundity among pumpkin-vines and "simblins"; I know how to tell when it is ripe without "plugging" it; I know how inviting it looks when it is cooling itself in a tub of water under the bed, waiting; I know how it looks when it lies on the table in the sheltered great floor-space between house and kitchen, and the children gathered for the sacrifice and their mouths watering; I know the crackling sound it makes when the carving-knife enters its end, and I can see the split fly along in front of the blade as the knife cleaves its way to the other end; I can see its halves fall apart and display the rich red meat and the black seeds, and the heart[Pg 461] standing up, a luxury fit for the elect; I know how a boy looks, behind a yard-long slice of that melon, and I know how he feels; for I have been there. I know the taste of the watermelon which has been honestly come by, and I know the taste of the watermelon which has been acquired by art. Both taste good, but the experienced know which tastes best. I know the look of green apples and peaches and pears on the trees, and I know how entertaining they are when they are inside of a person. I know how ripe ones look when they are piled in pyramids under the trees, and how pretty they are and how vivid their colors. I know how a frozen apple looks, in a barrel down cellar in the winter-time, and how hard it is to bite, and how the frost makes the teeth ache, and yet how good it is, notwithstanding. I know the disposition of elderly people to select the specked apples for the children, and I once knew ways to beat the game. I know the look of an apple that is roasting and sizzling on a hearth on a winter's evening, and I know the comfort that comes of eating it hot, along with some sugar and a drench of cream. I know the delicate art and mystery of so cracking hickory-nuts and walnuts on a flatiron with a hammer that the kernels will be delivered whole, and I know how the nuts, taken in conjunction with winter apples, cider and doughnuts, make old people's tales and old jokes sound fresh and crisp and enchanting, and juggle an evening away before you know what went with the time. I know the look of Uncle Dan'l's kitchen as it was on privileged nights when I was a child, and I can see the white and black children grouped on the hearth, with the firelight playing on their faces and the shadows flickering upon the walls, clear back toward the cavernous gloom of the rear, and I can hear Uncle Dan'l telling the immortal tales which Uncle Remus Harris was to gather into his books and charm the world with, by and by; and I can feel again the creepy joy which quivered through me when the time for the ghost-story of the "Golden Arm" was reached—and the sense of regret, too, which came over me, for it was always the last story of the evening, and there was nothing between it and the unwelcome bed.
As I mentioned, I spent part of every year at the farm until I was around twelve or thirteen. The life I had there with my cousins was enchanting, and I still cherish those memories. I can vividly recall the solemn twilight and mystery of the deep woods, the earthy scents, the faint fragrances of wildflowers, the glimmer of rain-washed leaves, the sound of raindrops rattling when the wind shook the trees, the distant hammering of woodpeckers, and the muffled drumming of wood-doves deep in the forest. I can picture the brief glimpses of startled wildlife darting through the grass—I can remember it all and make it feel as real and blessed as it ever was. I can remember the prairie, its solitude and tranquility, and a huge hawk hovering still in the sky, wings outstretched with the blue sky showing through the tips of its feathers. I can see the woods dressed in autumn colors, the oaks in purple, hickories glowing gold, maples and sumacs ablaze with crimson, and hear the rustling of fallen leaves as we trudged through them. I can spot the blue clusters of wild grapes hanging among the young trees, recalling their taste and smell. I remember how wild blackberries looked and tasted, along with pawpaws, hazelnuts, and persimmons; I can feel the thud of hickory nuts and walnuts hitting my head when we were out in the frosty dawn, scrambling for them with the pigs as the wind sent them tumbling down. I know the beautiful stain of blackberries, and I recognize how stubborn walnut hull stains are against soap and water, and how they begrudge the experience. I know the flavor of maple sap, when to gather it, how to set up the troughs and delivery tubes, how to boil down the juice, and how much better it tastes when you’ve made it your own, regardless of what the purists say. I know how a prize watermelon looks basking in the sun among pumpkin vines and “simblins”; I know how to tell when it's ripe without "plugging" it; I know how appealing it looks cooling in a tub of water under the bed, waiting; I know how it appears on the table in the airy space between the house and kitchen, with children gathered around, mouths watering; I can hear the crackling sound when the carving knife hits its end and see the split extend along the blade as it slices through to the other end; I can see the halves fall apart to reveal the rich red flesh and black seeds, and the heart standing out, a luxury fit for the elite. I know how a boy looks behind a huge slice of that melon, and I can feel what he feels; I’ve been there. I know the taste of watermelon earned honestly and the taste of one acquired through cleverness. Both are good, but the experienced know which one is best. I know how green apples, peaches, and pears look on the trees, and how entertaining they can be when within someone. I know how ripe ones look stacked in pyramids beneath the trees, how beautiful they are, and their vibrant colors. I recognize how a frozen apple looks in a barrel in the cellar during winter, how tough it is to bite, how the frost hurts my teeth, and yet how delicious it is despite that. I know how elderly folks tend to choose speckled apples for the kids, and I once knew tricks to escape that fate. I know how an apple looks roasting and sizzling on a hearth on a winter evening, and I know the comfort of eating it hot, with some sugar and a splash of cream. I understand the delicate art of cracking hickory nuts and walnuts on a flat iron with a hammer so that the kernels come out whole, and I know how nuts, combined with winter apples, cider, and doughnuts, can make old people's stories and jokes feel fresh and enchanting, passing the evening away before you realize where the time went. I can picture Uncle Dan'l's kitchen on special nights during my childhood, with white and black kids gathered around the hearth, firelight dancing on their faces and shadows flickering on the walls back toward the dark rear, and I can hear Uncle Dan'l telling the timeless stories that Uncle Remus Harris would later collect into his books to charm the world; I can once again feel the thrilling joy that would quiver through me when it was time for the ghost story of the "Golden Arm"—and the sense of regret that followed because it was always the last story of the night, with nothing left between it and the dreaded bed.
I can remember the bare wooden stairway in my uncle's house, and the turn to the left above the landing, and the rafters and the slanting roof over my bed, and the squares of moonlight on the floor, and the white cold world of snow outside, seen through[Pg 462] the curtainless window. I can remember the howling of the wind and the quaking of the house on stormy nights, and how snug and cozy one felt, under the blankets, listening, and how the powdery snow used to sift in, around the sashes, and lie in little ridges on the floor, and make the place look chilly in the morning, and curb the wild desire to get up—in case there was any. I can remember how very dark that room was, in the dark of the moon, and how packed it was with ghostly stillness when one woke up by accident away in the night, and forgotten sins came flocking out of the secret chambers of the memory and wanted a hearing; and how ill chosen the time seemed for this kind of business; and how dismal was the hoo-hooing of the owl and the wailing of the wolf, sent mourning by on the night wind.
I can remember the bare wooden stairs in my uncle's house, and the turn to the left at the top of the landing, and the rafters and the slanted roof over my bed, and the patches of moonlight on the floor, and the cold white world of snow outside, seen through[Pg 462] the window without curtains. I can remember the howling wind and the shaking of the house on stormy nights, and how snug and cozy it felt under the blankets, listening, and how the powdery snow would sift in around the window frames, lying in little ridges on the floor, making the place look chilly in the morning, and dampening the wild urge to get up—if there was even any urge at all. I can remember how dark that room was during the new moon, and how filled it felt with ghostly silence when one woke up unexpectedly in the middle of the night, and forgotten sins would rush out from the hidden corners of my memory and seek attention; and how inappropriate the timing felt for this kind of reflection; and how dismal was the hooting of the owl and the wailing of the wolf carried on the night wind.
I remember the raging of the rain on that roof, summer nights, and how pleasant it was to lie and listen to it, and enjoy the white splendor of the lightning and the majestic booming and crashing of the thunder. It was a very satisfactory room; and there was a lightning-rod which was reachable from the window, an adorable and skittish thing to climb up and down, summer nights, when there were duties on hand of a sort to make privacy desirable.
I remember the intense rain hitting the roof on those summer nights, and how nice it was to lie there and listen to it, enjoying the bright flashes of lightning and the powerful booming of thunder. It was a really cozy room; plus, there was a lightning rod accessible from the window, which was a fun and nerve-wracking thing to climb on those summer nights when I needed some privacy for various tasks.
I remember the 'coon and 'possum hunts, nights, with the negroes, and the long marches through the black gloom of the woods, and the excitement which fired everybody when the distant bay of an experienced dog announced that the game was treed; then the wild scramblings and stumblings through briars and bushes and over roots to get to the spot; then the lighting of a fire and the felling of the tree, the joyful frenzy of the dogs and the negroes, and the weird picture it all made in the red glare—I remember it all well, and the delight that every one got out of it, except the 'coon.
I remember the raccoon and opossum hunts at night with the Black folks, and the long treks through the dark woods, and the excitement that lit everyone up when the distant bark of a trained dog signaled that the game was in the trees; then the chaotic rush and tripping through thorns and brush and over roots to reach the spot; then lighting a fire and chopping down the tree, the joyful frenzy of the dogs and the Black folks, and the strange sight it all created in the red light—I remember it all clearly, and the joy everyone shared except for the raccoon.
I remember the pigeon seasons, when the birds would come in millions, and cover the trees, and by their weight break down the branches. They were clubbed to death with sticks; guns were not necessary, and were not used. I remember the squirrel hunts, and the prairie-chicken hunts, and the wild-turkey hunts, and all that; and how we turned out, mornings, while it was still dark, to go on these expeditions, and how chilly and dismal it was, and how often I regretted that I was well enough to go. A toot on a tin horn brought twice as many dogs as were needed, and in[Pg 463] their happiness they raced and scampered about, and knocked small people down, and made no end of unnecessary noise. At the word, they vanished away toward the woods, and we drifted silently after them in the melancholy gloom. But presently the gray dawn stole over the world, the birds piped up, then the sun rose and poured light and comfort all around, everything was fresh and dewy and fragrant, and life was a boon again. After three hours of tramping we arrived back wholesomely tired, overladen with game, very hungry, and just in time for breakfast.
I remember the seasons when pigeons would come in millions, covering the trees and breaking down the branches with their weight. They were clubbed to death with sticks; no guns were needed, and they weren't used. I recall the squirrel hunts, prairie-chicken hunts, and wild-turkey hunts, and how we would head out in the mornings while it was still dark for these adventures. It was chilly and gloomy, and I often wished I weren't well enough to go. A toot on a tin horn would bring out twice as many dogs as necessary, and in their excitement, they would race around, knock over small people, and make an endless amount of noise. At the command, they would vanish into the woods, and we would quietly follow them into the melancholy gloom. But soon, the gray dawn would creep over the world, the birds would start singing, and then the sun would rise, filling everything with light and warmth. The air would be fresh, dewy, and fragrant, and life felt wonderful again. After three hours of walking, we’d return pleasantly exhausted, loaded down with game, really hungry, and just in time for breakfast.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain
(To be Continued.)
To be continued.
FOOTNOTE:
[6] 100,000 acres.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ 100,000 acres.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXI.
MARCH 15, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XIV.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated Thursday, December 6, 1906.]
[Dictated Thursday, December 6, 1906.]
From Susy's Biography of Me.
From Susy's Biography of Me.
Feb. 27, Sunday.
Feb. 27, Sunday.
Clara's reputation as a baby was always a fine one, mine exactly the contrary. One often related story concerning her braveness as a baby and her own opinion of this quality of hers is this. Clara and I often got slivers in our hands and when mama took them out with a much dreaded needle, Clara was always very brave, and I very cowardly. One day Clara got one of these slivers in her hand, a very bad one, and while mama was taking it out, Clara stood perfectly still without even wincing: I saw how brave she was and turning to mamma said "Mamma isn't[Pg 562] she a brave little thing!" presently mamma had to give the little hand quite a dig with the needle and noticing how perfectly quiet Clara was about it she exclaimed, Why Clara! you are a brave little thing! Clara responded "No bodys braver but God!"—
Clara was always known as a brave kid, while I had the opposite reputation. There's a story that shows Clara's courage and how she saw it. Both Clara and I often got splinters in our hands, and when Mom took them out with a needle that we were all scared of, Clara was always really brave, and I was pretty cowardly. One day, Clara got a really bad splinter in her hand, and while Mom was taking it out, Clara stood completely still without even flinching. I saw how brave she was and turned to Mom, saying, "Mom, isn’t[Pg 562] she a brave little thing!" Eventually, Mom had to give Clara's little hand a hard poke with the needle, and noticing how quiet Clara was, she exclaimed, "Wow, Clara! You are a brave little thing!" Clara responded, "No one's braver but God!"
Clara's pious remark is the main detail, and Susy has accurately remembered its phrasing. The three-year-older's wound was of a formidable sort, and not one which the mother's surgery would have been equal to. The flesh of the finger had been burst by a cruel accident. It was the doctor that sewed it up, and to all appearances it was he, and the other independent witnesses, that did the main part of the suffering; each stitch that he took made Clara wince slightly, but it shrivelled the others.
Clara's religious comment is the key detail, and Susy has accurately recalled how she put it. The injury on the three-year-older was quite serious, something beyond what the mother could have treated. The flesh of the finger had been torn apart by a terrible accident. It was the doctor who stitched it up, and it seemed like he, along with the other independent witnesses, endured most of the pain; each stitch he made made Clara wince a little, but it made the others cringe.
I take pride in Clara's remark, because it shows that although she was only three years old, her fireside teachings were already making her a thinker—a thinker and also an observer of proportions. I am not claiming any credit for this. I furnished to the children worldly knowledge and wisdom, but was not competent to go higher, and so I left their spiritual education in the hands of the mother. A result of this modesty of mine was made manifest to me in a very striking way, some years afterward, when Jean was nine years old. We had recently arrived in Berlin, at the time, and had begun housekeeping in a furnished apartment. One morning at breakfast a vast card arrived—an invitation. To be precise, it was a command from the Emperor of Germany to come to dinner. During several months I had encountered socially, on the Continent, men bearing lofty titles; and all this while Jean was becoming more and more impressed, and awed, and subdued, by these imposing events, for she had not been abroad before, and they were new to her—wonders out of dreamland turned into realities. The imperial card was passed from hand to hand, around the table, and examined with interest; when it reached Jean she exhibited excitement and emotion, but for a time was quite speechless; then she said,
I take pride in Clara's comment because it shows that even though she was only three years old, her lessons by the fireplace were already shaping her into a thinker and an observer of proportions. I'm not claiming any credit for this. I provided the kids with worldly knowledge and wisdom, but I wasn't really equipped to go deeper, so I left their spiritual education to their mother. A result of my modesty became clear to me in a striking way a few years later when Jean was nine. We had just moved to Berlin and started settling into a furnished apartment. One morning at breakfast, a large card arrived—an invitation. To be precise, it was an order from the Emperor of Germany to join him for dinner. Over the past few months, I had encountered men with lofty titles while socializing on the Continent, and during this time, Jean was becoming increasingly impressed and awed by these grand events. This was her first time abroad, and they were all new to her—wonders from dreamland made real. The imperial card was passed around the table and examined with interest; when it got to Jean, she showed excitement and emotion, but for a moment, she was speechless. Then she said,
"Why, papa, if it keeps going on like this, pretty soon there won't be anybody left for you to get acquainted with but God."
"Why, Dad, if this keeps up, soon there won't be anyone left for you to meet except for God."
It was not complimentary to think I was not acquainted in that quarter, but she was young, and the young jump to conclusions without reflection.
It wasn't flattering to think I wasn't familiar with that area, but she was young, and young people tend to leap to conclusions without thinking things through.
Necessarily, I did myself the honor to obey the command of the Emperor Wilhelm II. Prince Heinrich, and six or eight[Pg 563] other guests were present. The Emperor did most of the talking, and he talked well, and in faultless English. In both of these conspicuousnesses I was gratified to recognize a resemblance to myself—a very exact resemblance; no, almost exact, but not quite that—a modified exactness, with the advantage in favor of the Emperor. My English, like his, is nearly faultless; like him I talk well; and when I have guests at dinner I prefer to do all the talking myself. It is the best way, and the pleasantest. Also the most profitable for the others.
I made it a point to honor the command of Emperor Wilhelm II. Prince Heinrich and six or eight other guests were there. The Emperor did most of the talking, and he was articulate, speaking flawless English. I was pleased to see a similarity between us—a close similarity; well, almost a perfect match, but not entirely—there's a slight difference, with the Emperor having the upper hand. My English is nearly perfect, just like his; I speak well, and when I have guests for dinner, I prefer to do all the talking myself. It’s the best way and the most enjoyable. Plus, it’s the most beneficial for everyone else.
I was greatly pleased to perceive that his Majesty was familiar with my books, and that his attitude toward them was not uncomplimentary. In the course of his talk he said that my best and most valuable book was "Old Times on the Mississippi." I will refer to that remark again, presently.
I was very happy to see that His Majesty was familiar with my books and that he had a positive attitude toward them. During our conversation, he mentioned that my best and most important book was "Old Times on the Mississippi." I'll bring that up again shortly.
An official who was well up in the Foreign Office at that time, and had served under Bismarck for fourteen years, was still occupying his old place under Chancellor Caprivi. Smith, I will call him of whom I am speaking, though that is not his name. He was a special friend of mine, and I greatly enjoyed his society, although in order to have it it was necessary for me to seek it as late as midnight, and not earlier. This was because Government officials of his rank had to work all day, after nine in the morning, and then attend official banquets in the evening; wherefore they were usually unable to get life-restoring fresh air and exercise for their jaded minds and bodies earlier than midnight; then they turned out, in groups of two or three, and gratefully and violently tramped the deserted streets until two in the morning. Smith had been in the Government service, at home and abroad, for more than thirty years, and he was now sixty years old, or close upon it. He could not remember a year in which he had had a vacation of more than a fortnight's length; he was weary all through to the bones and the marrow, now, and was yearning for a holiday of a whole three months—yearning so longingly and so poignantly that he had at last made up his mind to make a desperate cast for it and stand the consequences, whatever they might be. It was against all rules to ask for a vacation—quite against all etiquette; the shock of it would paralyze the Chancellery; stem etiquette and usage required another form: the applicant was not privileged to ask for a vacation, he must send in his resignation. The chancellor[Pg 564] would know that the applicant was not really trying to resign, and didn't want to resign, but was merely trying in this left-handed way to get a vacation.
An official who was high up in the Foreign Office at that time and had worked under Bismarck for fourteen years was still in his old position under Chancellor Caprivi. I’ll call him Smith, though that’s not his real name. He was a close friend of mine, and I really enjoyed spending time with him, though I had to seek him out after midnight to do so. This was because government officials at his level had to work all day, starting at nine in the morning, and then attend official banquets in the evening; as a result, they usually couldn't get the refreshing air and exercise they needed until after midnight. Then, they would head out in groups of two or three and gratefully and energetically walk the empty streets until two in the morning. Smith had been in government service, both at home and abroad, for over thirty years, and now he was about sixty years old or so. He couldn’t remember a year when he had more than a two-week vacation; he was utterly exhausted and longed for a full three-month holiday—longed for it so intensely that he finally decided to make a bold move and deal with whatever repercussions came his way. It was completely against the rules to ask for a vacation—totally against all etiquette; the shock of it would paralyze the Chancellery. According to etiquette and tradition, there was a different procedure: the person requesting a vacation wasn’t allowed to ask; instead, they had to submit their resignation. The chancellor[Pg 564] would understand that the requester wasn’t actually trying to resign and didn’t want to resign, but was just trying in this indirect way to get some time off.
The night before the Emperor's dinner I helped Smith take his exercise, after midnight, and he was full of his project. He had sent in his resignation that day, and was trembling for the result; and naturally, because it might possibly be that the chancellor would be happy to fill his place with somebody else, in which case he could accept the resignation without comment and without offence. Smith was in a very anxious frame of mind; not that he feared that Caprivi was dissatisfied with him, for he had no such fear; it was the Emperor that he was afraid of; he did not know how he stood with the Emperor. He said that while apparently it was Caprivi who would decide his case, it was in reality the Emperor who would perform that service; that the Emperor kept personal watch upon everything, and that no official sparrow could fall to the ground without his privity and consent; that the resignation would be laid before his Majesty, who would accept it or decline to accept it, according to his pleasure, and that then his pleasure in the matter would be communicated by Caprivi. Smith said he would know his fate the next evening, after the imperial dinner; that when I should escort his Majesty into the large salon contiguous to the dining-room, I would find there about thirty men—Cabinet ministers, admirals, generals and other great officials of the Empire—and that these men would be standing talking together in little separate groups of two or three persons; that the Emperor would move from group to group and say a word to each, sometimes two words, sometimes ten words; and that the length of his speech, whether brief or not so brief, would indicate the exact standing in the Emperor's regard, of the man accosted; and that by observing this thermometer an expert could tell, to half a degree, the state of the imperial weather in each case; that in Berlin, as in the imperial days of Rome, the Emperor was the sun, and that his smile or his frown meant good fortune or disaster to the man upon whom it should fall. Smith suggested that I watch the thermometer while the Emperor went his rounds of the groups; and added that if his Majesty talked four minutes with any person there present, it meant high favor, and that the sun was in the zenith, and cloudless, for that man.
The night before the Emperor's dinner, I helped Smith get some exercise after midnight, and he was buzzing about his plan. He had submitted his resignation that day and was anxious about the outcome; understandably, since there was a chance the chancellor might quickly fill his position with someone else, allowing him to accept the resignation without any fuss. Smith was really on edge; it wasn't that he thought Caprivi was unhappy with him—he didn’t fear that. His fear was of the Emperor; he had no idea how the Emperor felt about him. He explained that although it seemed like Caprivi would decide his fate, it was really the Emperor who would make the call; that the Emperor had a close eye on everything, and no official could fall from grace without his knowledge and approval. The resignation would be presented to His Majesty, who would either accept or reject it based on his wishes, and then Caprivi would relay that decision. Smith mentioned that he would find out his fate the next evening after the imperial dinner. He said when I would escort His Majesty into the large salon next to the dining room, I would see about thirty people—Cabinet ministers, admirals, generals, and other high officials—standing around chatting in small groups of two or three. The Emperor would go from group to group, saying a word or two here and there, sometimes a little more. The length of his comments, whether short or lengthy, would reveal how he viewed each person. An expert could gauge the Emperor's mood pretty accurately just by watching how he interacted with them; in Berlin, like in the imperial days of Rome, the Emperor was like the sun, and his smile or frown could mean either great fortune or disaster for whoever it landed on. Smith suggested I keep an eye on how long the Emperor spent talking to each group; he noted that if His Majesty spoke for four minutes with anyone there, it meant that person was in high favor, and that the sun was at its peak, shining brightly for them.
[Pg 565]I mentally recorded that four-minute altitude, and resolved to see if any man there on that night stood in sufficient favor to achieve it.
[Pg 565]I mentally noted that four-minute altitude and decided to find out if anyone there that night had enough favor to reach it.
Very well. After the dinner I watched the Emperor while he passed from group to group, and privately I timed him with a watch. Two or three times he came near to reaching the four-minute altitude, but always he fell short a little. The last man he came to was Smith. He put his hand on Smith's shoulder and began to talk to him; and when he finished, the thermometer had scored seven minutes! The company then moved toward the smoking-room, where cigars, beer and anecdotes would be in brisk service until midnight, and as Smith passed me he whispered,
Very well. After dinner, I watched the Emperor as he moved from group to group, and I quietly timed him with a watch. A couple of times he almost hit the four-minute mark, but he always fell just short. The last person he approached was Smith. He placed his hand on Smith's shoulder and started talking to him; by the time he finished, the timer had hit seven minutes! The group then headed to the smoking room, where cigars, beer, and stories would be served up lively until midnight, and as Smith walked by me, he whispered,
"That settles it. The chancellor will ask me how much of a vacation I want, and I sha'n't be afraid to raise the limit. I shall call for six months."
"That’s decided. The chancellor will ask me how much vacation I want, and I won’t be afraid to push for the max. I’ll ask for six months."
Smith's dream had been to spend his three months' vacation—in case he got a vacation instead of the other thing—in one of the great capitals of the Continent—a capital whose name I shall suppress, at present. The next day the chancellor asked him how much of a vacation he wanted, and where he desired to spend it. Smith told him. His prayer was granted, and rather more than granted. The chancellor augmented his salary and attached him to the German Embassy of that selected capital, giving him a place of high dignity bearing an imposing title, and with nothing to do except attend banquets of an extraordinary character at the Embassy, once or twice a year. The term of his vacation was not specified; he was to continue it until requested to come back to his work in the Foreign Office. This was in 1891. Eight years later Smith was passing through Vienna, and he called upon me. There had been no interruption of his vacation, as yet, and there was no likelihood that an interruption of it would occur while he should still be among the living.
Smith's dream had been to spend his three-month vacation—assuming he got a vacation instead of the other thing—in one of the great capitals of Europe—a capital whose name I won't reveal right now. The next day, the chancellor asked him how much vacation he wanted and where he wanted to spend it. Smith told him. His wish was granted, and even more than that. The chancellor raised his salary and assigned him to the German Embassy in that chosen capital, giving him a prestigious position with an impressive title, and with nothing to do except attend extraordinary banquets at the Embassy once or twice a year. The length of his vacation was not specified; he was to continue until he was asked to return to his job at the Foreign Office. This was in 1891. Eight years later, Smith was passing through Vienna and came to see me. He hadn't taken any break from his vacation yet, and it seemed unlikely that he would have to while he was still alive.
[Dictated Monday, December 17, 1906.] As I have already remarked, "Old Times on the Mississippi" got the Kaiser's best praise. It was after midnight when I reached home; I was usually out until toward midnight, and the pleasure of being out late was poisoned, every night, by the dread of what I must meet at my front door—an indignant face,[Pg 566] a resentful face, the face of the portier. The portier was a tow-headed young German, twenty-two or three years old; and it had been for some time apparent to me that he did not enjoy being hammered out of his sleep, nights, to let me in. He never had a kind word for me, nor a pleasant look. I couldn't understand it, since it was his business to be on watch and let the occupants of the several flats in at any and all hours of the night. I could not see why he so distinctly failed to get reconciled to it.
[Dictated Monday, December 17, 1906.] As I’ve already mentioned, "Old Times on the Mississippi" received high praise from the Kaiser. I got home after midnight; I usually stayed out until around that time, but the joy of being out late was overshadowed every night by the anxiety of facing what awaited me at my front door—an angry expression,[Pg 566] a resentful look, the face of the portier. The portier was a young German guy in his early twenties, and it had become clear to me that he wasn't happy about being dragged out of his sleep at night to let me in. He never had a friendly word or a pleasant expression for me. I couldn't figure it out since it was his job to be there and let the residents of the various apartments in at any hour. I couldn’t understand why he was so obviously bothered by it.
The fact is, I was ignorantly violating, every night, a custom in which he was commercially interested. I did not suspect this. No one had told me of the custom, and if I had been left to guess it, it would have taken me a very long time to make a success of it. It was a custom which was so well established and so universally recognized, that it had all the force and dignity of law. By authority of this custom, whosoever entered a Berlin house after ten at night must pay a trifling toll to the portier for breaking his sleep to let him in. This tax was either two and a half cents or five cents, I don't remember which; but I had never paid it, and didn't know I owed it, and as I had been residing in Berlin several weeks, I was so far in arrears that my presence in the German capital was getting to be a serious disaster to that young fellow.
The truth is, I was cluelessly breaking a custom that he was financially invested in every night. I didn’t realize this. No one had informed me about the custom, and if I had to guess it, it would have taken me a really long time to figure it out. It was a custom so deeply ingrained and widely accepted that it had all the weight and authority of law. According to this custom, anyone who entered a Berlin house after ten at night had to pay a small fee to the portier for waking him up to let them in. This fee was either two and a half cents or five cents; I can’t remember which. But I had never paid it and didn’t know I owed it. Since I had been living in Berlin for several weeks, my not paying was becoming a serious headache for that young guy.
I arrived from the imperial dinner sorrowful and anxious, made my presence known and prepared myself to wait in patience the tedious minute or two which the portier usually allowed himself to keep me tarrying—as a punishment. But this time there was no stage-wait; the door was instantly unlocked, unbolted, unchained and flung wide; and in it appeared the strange and welcome apparition of the portier's round face all sunshine and smiles and welcome, in place of the black frowns and hostility that I was expecting. Plainly he had not come out of his bed: he had been waiting for me, watching for me. He began to pour out upon me in the most enthusiastic and energetic way a generous stream of German welcome and homage, meanwhile dragging me excitedly to his small bedroom beside the front door; there he made me bend down over a row of German translations of my books and said,
I came back from the imperial dinner feeling sad and anxious, announced my arrival, and got ready to patiently endure the usual minute or two that the portier would take to keep me waiting—as a kind of punishment. But this time, there was no waiting at all; the door was unlocked, unbolted, unchained, and swung open immediately. The cheerful and welcoming sight of the portier's round face, full of sunshine and smiles, greeted me instead of the scowls and hostility I was expecting. Clearly, he hadn’t just woken up—he had been waiting for me, keeping an eye out for me. He enthusiastically poured out a warm stream of German greetings and respect, while excitedly pulling me into his small bedroom next to the front door; there, he had me bend down over a row of German translations of my books and said,
"There—you wrote them! I have found it out! By God, I did not know it before, and I ask a million pardons! That one[Pg 567] there, the 'Old Times on the Mississippi,' is the best book you ever wrote!"
"There—you wrote those! I just figured it out! By God, I didn’t realize it before, and I ask a million pardons! That one[Pg 567] there, 'Old Times on the Mississippi,' is the best book you ever wrote!"
The usual number of those curious accidents which we call coincidences have fallen to my share in this life, but for picturesqueness this one puts all the others in the shade: that a crowned head and a portier, the very top of an empire and the very bottom of it, should pass the very same criticism and deliver the very same verdict upon a book of mine—and almost in the same hour and the same breath—is a coincidence which out-coincidences any coincidence which I could have imagined with such powers of imagination as I have been favored with; and I have not been accustomed to regard them as being small or of an inferior quality. It is always a satisfaction to me to remember that whereas I do not know, for sure, what any other nation thinks of any one of my twenty-three volumes, I do at least know for a certainty what one nation of fifty millions thinks of one of them, at any rate; for if the mutual verdict of the top of an empire and the bottom of it does not establish for good and all the judgment of the entire nation concerning that book, then the axiom that we can get a sure estimate of a thing by arriving at a general average of all the opinions involved, is a fallacy.
I've experienced my fair share of those curious accidents we call coincidences in this life, but in terms of uniqueness, this one stands out from the rest: that a reigning monarch and a doorman, the pinnacle of an empire and its very lowest rung, should have the exact same critique and deliver the same verdict on one of my books—and almost within the same hour and breath— is a coincidence that surpasses anything I could have ever imagined with the creativity I’ve been given. And I don’t typically view coincidences as trivial or of lesser importance. It always feels satisfying to remember that while I have no idea what any other nation thinks of any of my twenty-three volumes, I do, at least, know for sure what one nation of fifty million people thinks about one of them; because if the shared opinion of the highest and lowest in an empire doesn’t reflect the judgment of the entire country regarding that book, then the idea that we can get a reliable sense of something by averaging out all opinions is a falsehood.
[Dictated Monday, February 10, 1907.] Two months ago (December 6) I was dictating a brief account of a private dinner in Berlin, where the Emperor of Germany was host and I the chief guest. Something happened day before yesterday which moves me to take up that matter again.
[Dictated Monday, February 10, 1907.] Two months ago (December 6) I was dictating a short summary of a private dinner in Berlin, where the Emperor of Germany hosted and I was the main guest. Something occurred the day before yesterday that prompts me to revisit that topic.
At the dinner his Majesty chatted briskly and entertainingly along in easy and flowing English, and now and then he interrupted himself to address a remark to me, or to some other individual of the guests. When the reply had been delivered, he resumed his talk. I noticed that the table etiquette tallied with that which was the law of my house at home when we had guests: that is to say, the guests answered when the host favored them with a remark, and then quieted down and behaved themselves until they got another chance. If I had been in the Emperor's chair and he in mine, I should have felt infinitely comfortable and at home, and should have done a world of talking, and done it well; but I was guest now, and consequently I felt less at home. From old experience, I was familiar with the[Pg 568] rules of the game, and familiar with their exercise from the high place of host; but I was not familiar with the trammelled and less satisfactory position of guest, therefore I felt a little strange and out of place. But there was no animosity—no, the Emperor was host, therefore according to my own rule he had a right to do the talking, and it was my honorable duty to intrude no interruptions or other improvements, except upon invitation; and of course it could be my turn some day: some day, on some friendly visit of inspection to America, it might be my pleasure and distinction to have him as guest at my table; then I would give him a rest, and a remarkably quiet time.
At dinner, His Majesty chatted in a lively and entertaining way, speaking easily and fluently in English. Occasionally, he interrupted himself to direct a comment to me or to another guest. Once the response was given, he continued his conversation. I noticed that the table manners matched those I was used to at home when we had guests: the guests responded when the host addressed them and then remained quiet until they got another chance to speak. If I had been in the Emperor's position and he in mine, I would have felt completely comfortable and would have enjoyed talking a lot; but as a guest, I felt less at ease. From past experience, I knew the rules of the game and how they worked from the host's perspective, but I wasn’t familiar with the constrained and less satisfying role of being a guest, so I felt a bit awkward and out of place. However, there was no hostility—no, the Emperor was hosting, so according to my own rule, he had the right to speak, and it was my respectful duty not to interrupt or add my own comments unless invited to. Of course, it could be my turn someday: perhaps during a friendly visit to America, it might be my honor and pleasure to have him as a guest at my table; then I would make sure he had a restful and peaceful time.
In one way there was a difference between his table and mine—for instance, atmosphere; the guests stood in awe of him, and naturally they conferred that feeling upon me, for, after all, I am only human, although I regret it. When a guest answered a question he did it with deferential voice and manner; he did not put any emotion into it, and he did not spin it out, but got it out of his system as quickly as he could, and then looked relieved. The Emperor was used to this atmosphere, and it did not chill his blood; maybe it was an inspiration to him, for he was alert, brilliant and full of animation; also he was most gracefully and felicitously complimentary to my books,—and I will remark here that the happy phrasing of a compliment is one of the rarest of human gifts, and the happy delivery of it another. In that other chapter I mentioned the high compliment which he paid to the book, "Old Times on the Mississippi," but there were others; among them some gratifying praise of my description in "A Tramp Abroad" of certain striking phases of German student life. I mention these things here because I shall have occasion to hark back to them presently.
In one way, there was a difference between his table and mine—like the atmosphere; the guests were in awe of him, and naturally, they extended that feeling to me because, after all, I’m only human, even though I wish I weren’t. When a guest answered a question, he did so with a respectful tone and demeanor; he didn’t infuse any emotion into it, and he didn’t drag it out; he just got it off his chest as quickly as possible and then looked relieved. The Emperor was used to this kind of atmosphere, and it didn’t bother him; maybe it even inspired him, because he was sharp, brilliant, and full of energy; he was also very graceful and genuinely complimentary about my books—and I want to point out that the ability to give a well-worded compliment is one of the rarest human talents, and delivering it well is another. In that other chapter, I mentioned the high praise he gave to my book, "Old Times on the Mississippi," but there were others too; among them was some gratifying praise for my depiction in "A Tramp Abroad" of certain striking aspects of German student life. I mention these things here because I’ll need to refer back to them shortly.
[Dictated Tuesday, February 12, 1907.]
[Dictated Tuesday, February 12, 1907.]
* * * * * *
* * * * * *
Those stars indicate the long chapter which I dictated yesterday, a chapter which is much too long for magazine purposes, and therefore must wait until this Autobiography shall appear in book form, five years hence, when I am dead: five years according to my calculation, twenty-seven years according to the prediction furnished me a week ago by the latest and most confident of all the palmists who have ever read my future in my hand. The Emperor's dinner, and its beer-and-anecdote appendix, covered six hours of diligent[Pg 569] industry, and this accounts for the extraordinary length of that chapter.
Those stars mark the long chapter I dictated yesterday, a chapter that's way too lengthy for magazine publication, so it will have to wait until this Autobiography is published in book form, five years from now, after I’m gone: five years based on my calculations, twenty-seven years according to the prediction I received a week ago from the most confident palm reader I’ve ever visited. The Emperor's dinner, along with its beer-and-anecdote supplement, took six hours of hard work[Pg 569], which explains the chapter's unusual length.
A couple of days ago a gentleman called upon me with a message. He had just arrived from Berlin, where he had been acting for our Government in a matter concerning tariff revision, he being a member of the commission appointed by our Government to conduct our share of the affair. Upon the completion of the commission's labors, the Emperor invited the members of it to an audience, and in the course of the conversation he made a reference to me; continuing, he spoke of my chapter on the German language in "A Tramp Abroad," and characterized it by an adjective which is too complimentary for me to repeat here without bringing my modesty under suspicion. Then he paid some compliments to "The Innocents Abroad," and followed these with the remark that my account in one of my books of certain striking phases of German student life was the best and truest that had ever been written. By this I perceive that he remembers that dinner of sixteen years ago, for he said the same thing to me about the student-chapter at that time. Next he said he wished this gentleman to convey two messages to America from him and deliver them—one to the President, the other to me. The wording of the message to me was:
A couple of days ago, a man visited me with a message. He had just come from Berlin, where he was working for our Government on tariff revision, as a member of the commission appointed for this task. Once the commission finished its work, the Emperor invited its members for a meeting, and during their conversation, he mentioned me. He went on to talk about my chapter on the German language in "A Tramp Abroad" and used an adjective to describe it that was so flattering I can’t repeat it without risking my modesty. Then he praised "The Innocents Abroad" and added that my discussion in one of my books about certain aspects of German student life was the best and most accurate ever written. This makes me think he remembers that dinner from sixteen years ago, because he said the same thing to me about the student chapter back then. Finally, he said he wanted this man to pass two messages to America on his behalf—one for the President and the other for me. The message for me was:
"Convey to Mr. Clemens my kindest regards. Ask him if he remembers that dinner, and ask him why he didn't do any talking."
"Please give Mr. Clemens my best regards. Ask him if he remembers that dinner and why he didn't say anything."
Why, how could I talk when he was talking? He "held the age," as the poker-clergy say, and two can't talk at the same time with good effect. It reminds me of the man who was reproached by a friend, who said,
Why could I talk when he was talking? He "held the floor," as the poker players say, and two people can’t have a good conversation at the same time. It reminds me of the guy who was criticized by a friend, who said,
"I think it a shame that you have not spoken to your wife for fifteen years. How do you explain it? How do you justify it?"
"I think it's a shame that you haven't talked to your wife in fifteen years. How do you explain that? How do you justify it?"
That poor man said,
That poor guy said,
"I didn't want to interrupt her."
"I didn't want to interrupt her."
If the Emperor had been at my table, he would not have suffered from my silence, he would only have suffered from the sorrows of his own solitude. If I were not too old to travel, I would go to Berlin and introduce the etiquette of my own table, which tallies with the etiquette observable at other royal tables. I would say, "Invite me again, your Majesty, and give me a chance"; then I would courteously waive rank and do all the[Pg 570] talking myself. I thank his Majesty for his kind message, and am proud to have it and glad to express my sincere reciprocation of its sentiments.
If the Emperor had been at my table, he wouldn’t have had to deal with my silence; he would have only faced the pain of his own loneliness. If I weren't too old to travel, I'd go to Berlin and bring my own dining etiquette, which matches the customs at other royal tables. I would say, "Invite me again, your Majesty, and give me a chance"; then I would politely set aside rank and do all the[Pg 570] talking myself. I appreciate his Majesty for his thoughtful message, and I'm proud to have it and happy to express my genuine reciprocation of its sentiments.
[Dictated January 17, 1906.] ... Rev. Joseph T. Harris and I have been visiting General Sickles. Once, twenty or twenty-five years ago, just as Harris was coming out of his gate Sunday morning to walk to his church and preach, a telegram was put into his hand. He read it immediately, and then, in a manner, collapsed. It said: "General Sickles died last night at midnight." [He had been a chaplain under Sickles through the war.]
[Dictated January 17, 1906.] ... Rev. Joseph T. Harris and I have been visiting General Sickles. About twenty or twenty-five years ago, just as Harris was stepping out of his gate on a Sunday morning to walk to his church and preach, someone handed him a telegram. He read it right away, and then, in a way, he just collapsed. It said: "General Sickles died last night at midnight." [He had served as a chaplain under Sickles during the war.]
It wasn't so. But no matter—it was so to Harris at the time. He walked along—walked to the church—but his mind was far away. All his affection and homage and worship of his General had come to the fore. His heart was full of these emotions. He hardly knew where he was. In his pulpit, he stood up and began the service, but with a voice over which he had almost no command. The congregation had never seen him thus moved, before, in his pulpit. They sat there and gazed at him and wondered what was the matter; because he was now reading, in this broken voice and with occasional tears trickling down his face, what to them seemed a quite unemotional chapter—that one about Moses begat Aaron, and Aaron begat Deuteronomy, and Deuteronomy begat St. Peter, and St. Peter begat Cain, and Cain begat Abel—and he was going along with this, and half crying—his voice continually breaking. The congregation left the church that morning without being able to account for this most extraordinary thing—as it seemed to them. That a man who had been a soldier for more than four years, and who had preached in that pulpit so many, many times on really moving subjects, without even the quiver of a lip, should break all down over the Begats, they couldn't understand. But there it is—any one can see how such a mystery as that would arouse the curiosity of those people to the boiling-point.
It wasn't like that. But it didn't matter—it felt that way to Harris at the time. He walked on—walked to the church—but his mind was miles away. All his love and admiration for his General surged to the surface. His heart was overflowing with these feelings. He barely realized where he was. In his pulpit, he stood up and started the service, but his voice was nearly out of control. The congregation had never seen him so emotional in the pulpit before. They sat there, staring at him, puzzled about what was happening; he was reading, in this choked voice with tears occasionally streaming down his face, what to them seemed like a completely unemotional chapter—that one about Moses begat Aaron, and Aaron begat Deuteronomy, and Deuteronomy begat St. Peter, and St. Peter begat Cain, and Cain begat Abel—and he was getting through it while half crying—his voice constantly breaking. The congregation left the church that morning unable to make sense of this most unusual occurrence, as it seemed to them. They couldn't understand how a man who had been a soldier for over four years and had preached in that pulpit so many times on truly moving topics, without so much as a quiver of his lip, could break down over the Begats. But there it is—anyone can see how such a mystery would stir up the curiosity of those people to the boiling point.
Harris has had many adventures. He has more adventures in a year than anybody else has in five. One Saturday night he noticed a bottle on his uncle's dressing-bureau. He thought the label said "Hair Restorer," and he took it in his room and gave his head a good drenching and sousing with it and carried it back and thought no more about it. Next morning when he got up his head was a bright green! He sent around everywhere[Pg 571] and couldn't get a substitute preacher, so he had to go to his church himself and preach—and he did it. He hadn't a sermon in his barrel—as it happened—of any lightsome character, so he had to preach a very grave one—a very serious one—and it made the matter worse. The gravity of the sermon did not harmonize with the gayety of his head, and the people sat all through it with handkerchiefs stuffed in their mouths to try to keep down their joy. And Harris told me that he was sure he never had seen his congregation—the whole body of his congregation—the entire body of his congregation—absorbed in interest in his sermon, from beginning to end, before. Always there had been an aspect of indifference, here and there, or wandering, somewhere; but this time there was nothing of the kind. Those people sat there as if they thought, "Good for this day and train only: we must have all there is of this show, not waste any of it." And he said that when he came down out of the pulpit more people waited to shake him by the hand and tell him what a good sermon it was, than ever before. And it seemed a pity that these people should do these fictions in such a place—right in the church—when it was quite plain they were not interested in the sermon at all; they only wanted to get a near view of his head.
Harris has had a ton of adventures. He experiences more in a year than most people do in five. One Saturday night, he spotted a bottle on his uncle's dresser. Thinking the label read "Hair Restorer," he took it to his room and drenched his hair with it, then returned it without thinking much more about it. The next morning, he woke up to find his hair bright green! He searched everywhere for a substitute preacher but had no luck, so he had to go to his church and preach himself—and he did. He didn’t have any light-hearted sermons on hand, so he ended up delivering a very serious one, which made things even worse. The gravity of his sermon didn’t match the brightness of his hair, and the congregation sat through it with handkerchiefs stuffed in their mouths, trying to hold back their laughter. Harris told me he had never seen his entire congregation so engaged in his sermon from start to finish before. Usually, there would be some indifference or distraction here and there, but this time, they were fully focused, as if they thought, "We need to soak this up and not miss a second of the show." He said that when he finally came down from the pulpit, more people than ever were waiting to shake his hand and tell him how great his sermon was. It seemed a shame that they were putting on such a performance in church, clearly more interested in his hair than in the sermon itself.
Well, Harris said—no, Harris didn't say, I say, that as the days went on and Sunday followed Sunday, the interest in Harris's hair grew and grew; because it didn't stay merely and monotonously green, it took on deeper and deeper shades of green; and then it would change and become reddish, and would go from that to some other color—purplish, yellowish, bluish, and so on—but it was never a solid color. It was always mottled. And each Sunday it was a little more interesting than it was the Sunday before—and Harris's head became famous, and people came from New York, and Boston, and South Carolina, and Japan, and so on, to look. There wasn't seating-capacity for all the people that came while his head was undergoing these various and fascinating mottlings. And it was a good thing in several ways, because the business had been languishing a little, and now a lot of people joined the church so that they could have the show, and it was the beginning of a prosperity for that church which has never diminished in all these years.
Well, Harris said—no, Harris didn't say, I say, that as the days went by and Sunday followed Sunday, the interest in Harris's hair grew and grew; because it didn't stay just plain and boring green, it took on deeper and deeper shades of green; and then it would change to reddish, and from that to some other color—purplish, yellowish, bluish, and so on—but it was never a solid color. It was always mottled. And each Sunday it was a little more interesting than the Sunday before—and Harris's head became famous, and people came from New York, Boston, South Carolina, Japan, and so on, to see it. There wasn't enough seating for all the people that came while his head was undergoing these various and fascinating changes. And it was good for several reasons, because the business had been struggling a bit, and now a lot of people joined the church just to see the show, marking the beginning of a prosperity for that church that has never faded in all these years.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXII.
APRIL 5, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XV.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated October 8, 1906.]
[Dictated October 8, 1906.]
From Susy's Biography of Me.
From Susy's Bio of Me.
Papa says that if the collera comes here he will take Sour Mash to the mountains.
Dad says that if the collera reaches here, he will take Sour Mash to the mountains.
This remark about the cat is followed by various entries, covering a month, in which Jean, General Grant, the sculptor Gerhardt, Mrs. Candace Wheeler, Miss Dora Wheeler, Mr. Frank Stockton, Mrs. Mary Mapes Dodge, and the widow of General Custer appear and drift in procession across the page, then vanish forever from the Biography; then Susy drops this remark in the wake of the vanished procession:
This comment about the cat is followed by several entries over the course of a month, featuring Jean, General Grant, sculptor Gerhardt, Mrs. Candace Wheeler, Miss Dora Wheeler, Mr. Frank Stockton, Mrs. Mary Mapes Dodge, and the widow of General Custer, who come and go across the page, then disappear for good from the Biography; then Susy adds this remark after the disappearing procession:
I did, in truth, think a great deal of that old tortoise-shell harlot; but I haven't a doubt that in order to impress Susy I was pretending agonies of solicitude which I didn't honestly feel. Sour Mash never gave me any real anxiety; she was always able to take care of herself, and she was ostentatiously vain of the fact; vain of it to a degree which often made me ashamed of her, much as I esteemed her.
I really did think a lot about that old tortoise-shell gold digger; but I'm sure I was just pretending to be really concerned in order to impress Susy, even though I didn't actually feel that way. Sour Mash never truly worried me; she always knew how to handle herself, and she was obviously proud of it—proud to the point where it sometimes made me feel embarrassed for her, even though I respected her a lot.
Many persons would like to have the society of cats during the summer vacation in the country, but they deny themselves this pleasure because they think they must either take the cats along when they return to the city, where they would be a trouble and an encumbrance, or leave them in the country, houseless and homeless. These people have no ingenuity, no invention, no wisdom; or it would occur to them to do as I do: rent cats by the month for the summer and return them to their good homes at the end of it. Early last May I rented a kitten of a farmer's wife, by the month; then I got a discount by taking three. They have been good company for about five months now, and are still kittens—at least they have not grown much, and to all intents and purposes are still kittens, and as full of romping energy and enthusiasm as they were in the beginning. This is remarkable. I am an expert in cats, but I have not seen a kitten keep its kittenhood nearly so long before.
Many people would love to have the company of cats during the summer vacation in the countryside, but they deny themselves this pleasure because they think they either have to take the cats back to the city, where they would be a hassle and a burden, or leave them in the country, without a home. These people lack creativity, innovation, and insight; otherwise, they would think of doing what I do: rent cats by the month for the summer and return them to their good homes afterward. Early last May, I rented a kitten from a farmer's wife, by the month; then I got a discount by taking three. They've been great company for about five months now and are still kittens—at least they haven't grown much, and for all practical purposes are still kittens, full of energy and enthusiasm just like they were at the start. This is quite remarkable. I'm an expert in cats, but I haven't seen a kitten stay in its kittenhood for so long before.
These are beautiful creatures—these triplets. Two of them wear the blackest and shiniest and thickest of sealskin vestments all over their bodies except the lower half of their faces and the terminations of their paws. The black masks reach down below the eyes, therefore when the eyes are closed they are not visible; the rest of the face, and the gloves and stockings, are snow white. These markings are just the same on both cats—so exactly the same that when you call one the other is likely to answer, because they cannot tell each other apart. Since the cats are precisely alike, and can't be told apart by any of us, they do not need two names, so they have but one between them. We call both of them Sackcloth, and we call the gray one Ashes. I believe I have never seen such intelligent cats as these before. They are full of the nicest discriminations. When I read German aloud they weep; you can see the tears run down. It shows what pathos there is in the German tongue. I had not noticed before[Pg 675] that all German is pathetic, no matter what the subject is nor how it is treated. It was these humble observers that brought the knowledge to me. I have tried all kinds of German on these cats; romance, poetry, philosophy, theology, market reports; and the result has always been the same—the cats sob, and let the tears run down, which shows that all German is pathetic. French is not a familiar tongue to me, and the pronunciation is difficult, and comes out of me encumbered with a Missouri accent; but the cats like it, and when I make impassioned speeches in that language they sit in a row and put up their paws, palm to palm, and frantically give thanks. Hardly any cats are affected by music, but these are; when I sing they go reverently away, showing how deeply they feel it. Sour Mash never cared for these things. She had many noble qualities, but at bottom she was not refined, and cared little or nothing for theology and the arts.
These triplets are beautiful creatures. Two of them wear the shiniest, thickest black sealskin coats that cover their bodies except for the lower half of their faces and the tips of their paws. Their black masks go down below their eyes, so when their eyes are closed, you can’t see them; the rest of their faces, along with their gloves and stockings, are snow white. Their markings are identical—so much so that when you call one, the other is likely to respond, as they can't tell each other apart. Since they look exactly the same and none of us can distinguish between them, they only need one name. We call both of them Sackcloth and the gray one Ashes. I don’t think I’ve ever seen such intelligent cats before. They have the finest sensitivities. When I read German aloud, they cry; you can see the tears rolling down. It shows how much emotion there is in the German language. I hadn't realized before[Pg 675] that all German is emotional, regardless of the topic or how it’s presented. It was these observant cats that made me aware of this. I’ve tried all kinds of German with them—romance, poetry, philosophy, theology, market reports—and the result is always the same: the cats cry and let the tears fall, which proves that all German is emotional. French isn’t a language I’m familiar with, and my pronunciation is tricky, coming out with a Missouri accent, but the cats enjoy it. When I give passionate speeches in French, they sit in a line, put their paws together, and enthusiastically show their gratitude. Hardly any cats respond to music, but these do; when I sing, they walk away reverently, demonstrating how deeply they feel it. Sour Mash never cared for these things. She had many great qualities, but at her core, she wasn’t refined and didn’t care much for theology or the arts.
It is a pity to say it, but these cats are not above the grade of human beings, for I know by certain signs that they are not sincere in their exhibitions of emotion, but exhibit them merely to show off and attract attention—conduct which is distinctly human, yet with a difference: they do not know enough to conceal their desire to show off, but the grown human being does. What is ambition? It is only the desire to be conspicuous. The desire for fame is only the desire to be continuously conspicuous and attract attention and be talked about.
It’s unfortunate to say, but these cats aren’t any better than humans because I can tell from certain clues that they aren’t genuine in their displays of emotion; they show off just to get attention—something that is definitely human, but with a twist: they don’t realize they should hide their need to show off, while adults do. What is ambition? It’s just the desire to stand out. The desire for fame is simply the wish to be constantly noticeable, attract attention, and be talked about.
These cats are like human beings in another way: when Ashes began to work his fictitious emotions, and show off, the other members of the firm followed suit, in order to be in the fashion. That is the way with human beings; they are afraid to be outside; whatever the fashion happens to be, they conform to it, whether it be a pleasant fashion or the reverse, they lacking the courage to ignore it and go their own way. All human beings would like to dress in loose and comfortable and highly colored and showy garments, and they had their desire until a century ago, when a king, or some other influential ass, introduced sombre hues and discomfort and ugly designs into masculine clothing. The meek public surrendered to the outrage, and by consequence we are in that odious captivity to-day, and are likely to remain in it for a long time to come.
These cats are similar to people in another way: when Ashes started to express his fake emotions and show off, the other members of the firm followed along to stay trendy. That’s how humans are; they’re afraid to stand out. Whatever the trend is, they conform to it, whether it’s a nice trend or not, lacking the courage to ignore it and do their own thing. Everyone would prefer to wear loose, comfortable, bright, and flashy clothes, and they had that option until a century ago when a king, or some other influential fool, introduced dull colors, discomfort, and ugly designs into men’s fashion. The submissive public gave in to this nonsense, and as a result, we are still stuck in this annoying situation today, and we’re likely to be for a long time to come.
Fortunately the women were not included in the disaster, and so their graces and their beauty still have the enhancing help[Pg 676] of delicate fabrics and varied and beautiful colors. Their clothing makes a great opera audience an enchanting spectacle, a delight to the eye and the spirit, a Garden of Eden for charm and color. The men, clothed in dismal black, are scattered here and there and everywhere over the Garden, like so many charred stumps, and they damage the effect, but cannot annihilate it.
Fortunately, the women were not affected by the disaster, so their grace and beauty still benefit from delicate fabrics and a variety of beautiful colors. Their clothing turns a big opera audience into an enchanting spectacle, a delight for the eyes and soul, a Garden of Eden filled with charm and color. The men, dressed in dull black, are scattered throughout the Garden like charred stumps; they detract from the effect but can't completely ruin it.
In summer we poor creatures have a respite, and may clothe ourselves in white garments; loose, soft, and in some degree shapely; but in the winter—the sombre winter, the depressing winter, the cheerless winter, when white clothes and bright colors are especially needed to brighten our spirits and lift them up—we all conform to the prevailing insanity, and go about in dreary black, each man doing it because the others do it, and not because he wants to. They are really no sincerer than Sackcloth and Ashes. At bottom the Sackcloths do not care to exhibit their emotions when I am performing before them, they only do it because Ashes started it.
In summer, we poor souls get a break and can wear white clothes—loose, soft, and somewhat stylish. But in winter—the gloomy winter, the depressing winter, the joyless winter—when we really need white and bright colors to lift our spirits, we all fall into the same madness, dressing in dreary black. Each person does it just because everyone else does, not because they actually want to. They're really no more genuine than sackcloth and ashes. Deep down, the ones in sackcloth don’t care to show their feelings while I perform for them; they only do it because ashes started it.
I would like to dress in a loose and flowing costume made all of silks and velvets, resplendent with all the stunning dyes of the rainbow, and so would every sane man I have ever known; but none of us dares to venture it. There is such a thing as carrying conspicuousness to the point of discomfort; and if I should appear on Fifth Avenue on a Sunday morning, at church-time, clothed as I would like to be clothed, the churches would be vacant, and I should have all the congregations tagging after me, to look, and secretly envy, and publicly scoff. It is the way human beings are made; they are always keeping their real feelings shut up inside, and publicly exploiting their fictitious ones.
I want to wear a loose, flowing outfit made entirely of silk and velvet, dazzling with all the beautiful colors of the rainbow, and so does every sane man I’ve ever met; but none of us dares to do it. There’s a fine line between standing out and being uncomfortable, and if I showed up on Fifth Avenue on a Sunday morning, at church time, dressed how I’d really like to be, the churches would be empty, and I’d have all the churchgoers following me to gawk, secretly envy me, and publicly mock me. That’s just how people are; they tend to keep their true feelings hidden and put their fake ones on display.
Next after fine colors, I like plain white. One of my sorrows, when the summer ends, is that I must put off my cheery and comfortable white clothes and enter for the winter into the depressing captivity of the shapeless and degrading black ones. It is mid-October now, and the weather is growing cold up here in the New Hampshire hills, but it will not succeed in freezing me out of these white garments, for here the neighbors are few, and it is only of crowds that I am afraid. I made a brave experiment, the other night, to see how it would feel to shock a crowd with these unseasonable clothes, and also to see how long it might take the crowd to reconcile itself to them and stop looking astonished and outraged. On a stormy evening I made a talk before a full[Pg 677] house, in the village, clothed like a ghost, and looking as conspicuously, all solitary and alone on that platform, as any ghost could have looked; and I found, to my gratification, that it took the house less than ten minutes to forget about the ghost and give its attention to the tidings I had brought.
After nice colors, I really like plain white. One of my sad moments when summer ends is having to put away my bright and comfy white clothes and face the winter in those dull and unflattering black ones. It’s mid-October now, and the weather is getting cold up here in the New Hampshire hills, but I won’t let it drive me out of my white clothes, since there aren’t many neighbors around and it’s only big crowds that I’m worried about. The other night, I bravely tried out how it would feel to shock a crowd with my out-of-season outfit, and also to see how long it would take for them to get used to it and stop looking so shocked and outraged. On a stormy evening, I gave a talk to a packed[Pg 677] house in the village, dressed like a ghost and standing out starkly alone on that platform; to my delight, it took the audience less than ten minutes to forget about the ghost and focus on the news I was sharing.
I am nearly seventy-one, and I recognize that my age has given me a good many privileges; valuable privileges; privileges which are not granted to younger persons. Little by little I hope to get together courage enough to wear white clothes all through the winter, in New York. It will be a great satisfaction to me to show off in this way; and perhaps the largest of all the satisfactions will be the knowledge that every scoffer, of my sex, will secretly envy me and wish he dared to follow my lead.
I’m almost seventy-one, and I realize that my age has given me a lot of perks; valuable perks; perks that younger people don’t get. Gradually, I hope to find the courage to wear white clothes all winter in New York. It would be a great satisfaction for me to show off like this; and maybe the biggest satisfaction will be knowing that every critic of my gender will secretly envy me and wish they had the guts to follow my example.
That mention that I have acquired new and great privileges by grace of my age, is not an uncalculated remark. When I passed the seventieth mile-stone, ten months ago, I instantly realized that I had entered a new country and a new atmosphere. To all the public I was become recognizably old, undeniably old; and from that moment everybody assumed a new attitude toward me—the reverent attitude granted by custom to age—and straightway the stream of generous new privileges began to flow in upon me and refresh my life. Since then, I have lived an ideal existence; and I now believe what Choate said last March, and which at the time I didn't credit: that the best of life begins at seventy; for then your work is done; you know that you have done your best, let the quality of the work be what it may; that you have earned your holiday—a holiday of peace and contentment—and that thenceforth, to the setting of your sun, nothing will break it, nothing interrupt it.
Acknowledging that I’ve gained new and significant privileges because of my age isn’t just an offhand comment. When I hit the milestone of seventy ten months ago, I immediately felt like I had stepped into a new place and a new environment. To everyone around me, I became clearly old, undeniably old; and from that point on, people started to treat me differently—with the respect usually given to seniors—and right away, I was granted a wave of generous new privileges that revitalized my life. Since then, I've enjoyed an ideal existence; and I now believe what Choate said last March, which I didn’t take seriously at the time: that the best part of life starts at seventy; because by then, your work is finished; you know you’ve done your best, regardless of the quality of that work; you’ve earned your rest—a rest filled with peace and satisfaction—and from then on, until the end of your days, nothing will disturb it, nothing will interrupt it.
[Dictated January 22, 1907.] In an earlier chapter I inserted some verses beginning "Love Came at Dawn" which had been found among Susy's papers after her death. I was not able to say that they were hers, but I judged that they might be, for the reason that she had not enclosed them in quotation marks according to her habit when storing up treasures gathered from other people. Stedman was not able to determine the authorship for me, as the verses were new to him, but the authorship has now been traced. The verses were written by William Wilfred Campbell, a Canadian poet, and they form a part of the contents of his book called "Beyond the Hills of Dream."
[Dictated January 22, 1907.] In an earlier chapter, I included some verses that start with "Love Came at Dawn," which were found among Susy's papers after she passed away. I couldn’t confirm they were hers, but I suspected they might be since she didn’t put them in quotation marks like she usually did when saving quotes from others. Stedman couldn't identify the author for me since the verses were new to him, but the authorship has now been confirmed. The verses were written by William Wilfred Campbell, a Canadian poet, and they are part of his book titled "Beyond the Hills of Dream."
[Pg 678]The authorship of the beautiful lines which my wife and I inscribed upon Susy's gravestone was untraceable for a time. We had found them in a book in India, but had lost the book and with it the author's name. But in time an application to the editor of "Notes and Queries" furnished me the author's name,[7] and it has been added to the verses upon the gravestone.
[Pg 678]The authorship of the beautiful lines that my wife and I inscribed on Susy's gravestone was unknown for a while. We had found them in a book in India, but we lost the book and with it the author's name. Eventually, a request to the editor of "Notes and Queries" provided me with the author's name,[7] and it has been added to the verses on the gravestone.
Last night, at a dinner-party where I was present, Mr. Peter Dunne Dooley handed to the host several dollars, in satisfaction of a lost bet. I seemed to see an opportunity to better my condition, and I invited Dooley, apparently disinterestedly, to come to my house Friday and play billiards. He accepted, and I judge that there is going to be a deficit in the Dooley treasury as a result. In great qualities of the heart and brain, Dooley is gifted beyond all propriety. He is brilliant; he is an expert with his pen, and he easily stands at the head of all the satirists of this generation—but he is going to walk in darkness Friday afternoon. It will be a fraternal kindness to teach him that with all his light and culture, he does not know all the valuable things; and it will also be a fraternal kindness to him to complete his education for him—and I shall do this on Friday, and send him home in that perfected condition.
Last night, at a dinner party I attended, Mr. Peter Dunne Dooley handed the host several dollars to settle a lost bet. I saw an opportunity to improve my situation, so I casually invited Dooley to come over to my house on Friday to play billiards. He accepted, and I suspect this will lead to a financial loss for Dooley. In terms of heart and intellect, Dooley is immensely talented. He's brilliant, a skilled writer, and he easily ranks among the top satirists of this generation—but he’s going to be in for a surprise this Friday afternoon. It will be a brotherly act to show him that despite all his intelligence and refinement, there are still valuable things he doesn't know. It will also be a brotherly gesture to help him complete his education—and I plan to do just that on Friday and send him home well-informed.
I possess a billiard secret which can be valuable to the Dooley sept, after I shall have conferred it upon Dooley—for a consideration. It is a discovery which I made by accident, thirty-eight years ago, in my father-in-law's house in Elmira. There was a scarred and battered and ancient billiard-table in the garret, and along with it a peck of checked and chipped balls, and a rackful of crooked and headless cues. I played solitaire up there every day with that difficult outfit. The table was not level, but slanted sharply to the southeast; there wasn't a ball that was round, or would complete the journey you started it on, but would always get tired and stop half-way and settle, with a jolty wabble, to a standstill on its chipped side. I tried making counts with four balls, but found it difficult and discouraging, so I added a fifth ball, then a sixth, then a seventh, and kept on adding until at last I had twelve balls on the table and a thirteenth to play with. My game was caroms—caroms solely—caroms plain, or caroms with cushion to help—anything that could furnish a count. In the course of time I found to my astonishment that I was never[Pg 679] able to run fifteen, under any circumstances. By huddling the balls advantageously in the beginning, I could now and then coax fourteen out of them, but I couldn't reach fifteen by either luck or skill. Sometimes the balls would get scattered into difficult positions and defeat me in that way; sometimes if I managed to keep them together, I would freeze; and always when I froze, and had to play away from the contact, there was sure to be nothing to play at but a wide and uninhabited vacancy.
I have a billiard secret that could be useful to the Dooley family, once I share it with Dooley—for a price. It’s something I stumbled upon thirty-eight years ago at my father-in-law’s house in Elmira. There was an old, beaten-up billiard table in the attic, along with a ton of checked and chipped balls and a bunch of bent and broken cues. I played solitaire up there every day with that tricky set. The table wasn’t level; it slanted sharply to the southeast. Not a single ball was perfectly round, and they all seemed to get tired and stop halfway, wobbling a bit before settling down on their chipped edges. I tried playing with four balls, but I found it tough and frustrating, so I added a fifth, then a sixth, then a seventh, and kept going until I had twelve balls on the table and a thirteenth to play with. My game was all about caroms—just caroms—plain caroms or caroms with the cushion for help—anything that would give me a count. Over time, I was shocked to realize that I could never manage to get to fifteen, no matter what. By grouping the balls just right at the start, I could sometimes scrape together fourteen, but I never hit fifteen with either luck or skill. Occasionally, the balls would get scattered into tricky spots, which would defeat me; other times, if I kept them close, I’d freeze. And whenever I froze and had to play away from the contact, there was always just a wide, empty space to aim at.
One day Mr. Dalton called on my brother-in-law, on a matter of business, and I was asked if I could entertain him awhile, until my brother-in-law should finish an engagement with another gentleman. I said I could, and took him up to the billiard-table. I had played with him many times at the club, and knew that he could play billiards tolerably well—only tolerably well—but not any better than I could. He and I were just a match. He didn't know our table; he didn't know those balls; he didn't know those warped and headless cues; he didn't know the southeastern slant of the table, and how to allow for it. I judged it would be safe and profitable to offer him a bet on my scheme. I emptied the avalanche of thirteen balls on the table and said:
One day, Mr. Dalton visited my brother-in-law for a business matter, and I was asked if I could keep him entertained for a while until my brother-in-law finished an appointment with another guy. I agreed and took him to the billiard table. I had played with him many times at the club and knew he could play billiards pretty well—just pretty well—but not any better than me. We were a perfect match. He didn’t know our table, the balls, those warped and headless cues, or the southeast slope of the table and how to account for it. I figured it would be safe and smart to offer him a bet on my strategy. I cleared the pile of thirteen balls onto the table and said:
"Take a ball and begin, Mr. Dalton. How many can you run with an outlay like that?"
"Grab a ball and go for it, Mr. Dalton. How many can you manage with a setup like that?"
He said, with the half-affronted air of a mathematician who has been asked how much of the multiplication table he can recite without a break:
He said, with the mildly offended attitude of a mathematician who's been asked how much of the multiplication table he can recite nonstop:
"I suppose a million—eight hundred thousand, anyway."
"I guess around a million—maybe eight hundred thousand, at least."
I said "You shall hove the privilege of placing the balls to suit yourself, and I want to bet you a dollar that you can't run fifteen."
I said, "You can set the balls however you want, and I want to bet you a dollar that you can't get fifteen."
I will not dwell upon the sequel. At the end of an hour his face was red, and wet with perspiration; his outer garments lay scattered here and there over the place; he was the angriest man in the State, and there wasn't a rag or remnant of an injurious adjective left in him anywhere—and I had all his small change.
I won’t go into what happened next. After an hour, his face was red and sweaty; his clothes were thrown all over the place; he was the angriest person in the State, and there wasn’t a single hurtful word left in him—and I had all his loose change.
When the summer was over, we went home to Hartford, and one day Mr. George Robertson arrived from Boston with two or three hours to spare between then and the return train, and as he was a young gentleman to whom we were in debt for much social pleasure, it was my duty, and a welcome duty, to make his two or three hours interesting for him. So I took him up-stairs[Pg 680] and set up my billiard scheme for his comfort. Mine was a good table, in perfect repair; the cues were in perfect condition; the balls were ivory, and flawless—but I knew that Mr. Robertson was my prey, just the same, for by exhaustive tests with this outfit I had found that my limit was thirty-one. I had proved to my satisfaction that whereas I could not fairly expect to get more than six or eight or a dozen caroms out of a run, I could now and then reach twenty and twenty-five, and after a long procession of failures finally achieve a run of thirty-one; but in no case had I ever got beyond thirty-one. Robertson's game, as I knew, was a little better than mine, so I resolved to require him to make thirty-two. I believed it would entertain him. He was one of these brisk and hearty and cheery and self-satisfied young fellows who are brimful of confidence, and who plunge with grateful eagerness into any enterprise that offers a showy test of their abilities. I emptied the balls on the table and said,
When summer ended, we headed back home to Hartford. One day, Mr. George Robertson arrived from Boston with a few hours to kill before his return train. Since he was a young man to whom we owed a lot of enjoyable social moments, it was my responsibility—and a pleasure—to make his spare time interesting. So, I took him upstairs[Pg 680] and set up my billiards for his enjoyment. I had a good table, in perfect condition; the cues were in great shape; the balls were ivory and flawless. But I knew I had the upper hand because my extensive practice revealed that my limit was thirty-one. I figured out that while I couldn’t reasonably expect to score more than six, eight, or even a dozen caroms in a run, I could occasionally reach twenty or twenty-five, and after a series of failures, finally achieve a run of thirty-one. However, I had never gone beyond thirty-one. I knew Robertson’s game was slightly better than mine, so I decided to challenge him to make thirty-two. I thought it would keep him entertained. He was one of those upbeat, cheerful, and self-satisfied young guys who were full of confidence, diving eagerly into anything that offered a flashy test of their skills. I set the balls on the table and said,
"Take a cue and a ball, George, and begin. How many caroms do you think you can make out of that layout?"
"Grab a cue and a ball, George, and get started. How many caroms do you think you can make with that setup?"
He laughed the laugh of the gay and the care-free, as became his youth and inexperience, and said,
He laughed with the joy and carefree spirit of youth, fitting for his age and naivety, and said,
"I can punch caroms out of that bunch a week without a break."
"I can make caroms out of that group all week without a break."
I said "Place the balls to suit yourself, and begin."
I said, "Arrange the balls however you like, and start."
Confidence is a necessary thing in billiards, but overconfidence is bad. George went at his task with much too much lightsomeness of spirit and disrespect for the situation. On his first shot he scored three caroms; on his second shot he scored four caroms; and on his third shot he missed as simple a carom as could be devised. He was very much astonished, and said he would not have supposed that careful play could be needed with an acre of bunched balls in front of a person.
Confidence is important in billiards, but being overconfident is a mistake. George approached his task with too much carefree attitude and a lack of respect for the situation. On his first shot, he made three caroms; on his second shot, he made four caroms; but on his third shot, he missed an incredibly simple carom. He was really surprised and said he wouldn’t have thought that careful play was necessary with so many balls clustered in front of him.
He began again, and played more carefully, but still with too much lightsomeness; he couldn't seem to learn to take the situation seriously. He made about a dozen caroms and broke down. He was irritated with himself now, and he thought he caught me laughing. He didn't. I do not laugh publicly at my client when this game is going on; I only do it inside—or save it for after the exhibition is over. But he thought he had caught me laughing, and it increased his irritation. Of course I knew he thought I was laughing privately—for I was experienced; they all[Pg 681] think that, and it has a good effect; it sharpens their annoyance and debilitates their play.
He started again and played more carefully, but he was still too casual; he just couldn’t seem to take the situation seriously. He managed about a dozen caroms and then fell apart. He was getting frustrated with himself, and he thought he saw me laughing. He didn’t. I don’t laugh in front of my client while this game is happening; I only do it inside—or save it for after the exhibition is done. But he thought he caught me laughing, which made him even more irritated. Of course, I knew he thought I was laughing privately—because I had seen it all before; they all[Pg 681] think that, and it works well; it heightens their annoyance and messes up their game.
He made another trial and failed. Once more he was astonished; once more he was humiliated—and as for his anger, it rose to summer-heat. He arranged the balls again, grouping them carefully, and said he would win this time, or die. When a client reaches this condition, it is a good time to damage his nerve further, and this can always be done by saying some little mocking thing or other that has the outside appearance of a friendly remark—so I employed this art. I suggested that a bet might tauten his nerves, and that I would offer one, but that as I did not want it to be an expense to him, but only a help, I would make it small—a cigar, if he were willing—a cigar that he would fail again; not an expensive one, but a cheap native one, of the Crown Jewel breed, such as is manufactured in Hartford for the clergy. It set him afire all over! I could see the blue flame issue from his eyes. He said,
He tried again and failed. Once again, he was shocked; once again, he felt embarrassed—and his anger surged like summer heat. He set up the balls again, arranging them carefully, and declared he would win this time, or die trying. When a client reaches this point, it’s an ideal time to shake their confidence even more, and that can always be done with a little mocking comment that seems like a friendly remark—so I used this tactic. I suggested that a bet might strengthen his nerves, and I’d offer one, but since I didn’t want it to be a burden for him, just a little encouragement, I’d make it small—a cigar, if he was up for it—betting that he would fail again; not an expensive one, but a cheap local one, like the Crown Jewel variety made in Hartford for the clergy. It ignited his anger! I could see the blue fire in his eyes. He said,
"Make it a hundred!—and no Connecticut cabbage-leaf product, but Havana, $25 the box!"
"Make it a hundred!—and not some cheap Connecticut stuff, but Havana, $25 a box!"
I took him up, but said I was sorry to see him do this, because it did not seem to me right or fair for me to rob him under our own roof, when he had been so kind to us. He said, with energy and acrimony:
I picked him up, but I told him I was sorry to see him do this because it didn’t seem right or fair to take from him under our own roof, especially after he had been so kind to us. He said, with passion and bitterness:
"You take care of your own pocket, if you'll be so good, and leave me to take care of mine."
"You look after your own finances, if you don't mind, and let me handle mine."
And he plunged at the congress of balls with a vindictiveness which was infinitely contenting to me. He scored a failure—and began to undress. I knew it would come to that, for he was in the condition now that Mr. Dooley will be in at about that stage of the contest on Friday afternoon. A clothes-rack will be provided for Mr. Dooley to hang his things on as fast as he shall from time to time shed them. George raised his voice four degrees and flung out the challenge—
And he dove into the party with a determination that I found incredibly satisfying. He failed—and started to take off his clothes. I knew it would end like this, because he was in the same state Mr. Dooley will be in around that point in the match on Friday afternoon. A clothes rack will be set up for Mr. Dooley to hang his stuff on as he takes it off. George raised his voice and threw out the challenge—
"Double or quits!"
"Double or nothing!"
"Done," I responded, in the gentle and compassionate voice of one who is apparently getting sorrier and sorrier.
"Done," I replied, in the soft and caring tone of someone who clearly feels more and more regret.
There was an hour and a half of straight disaster after that, and if it was a sin to enjoy it, it is no matter—I did enjoy it. It is half a lifetime ago, but I enjoy it yet, every time I think of it George made failure after failure. His fury increased with each[Pg 682] failure as he scored it. With each defeat he flung off one or another rag of his raiment, and every time he started on a fresh inning he made it "double or quits" once more. Twice he reached thirty and broke down; once he reached thirty-one and broke down. These "nears" made him frantic, and I believe I was never so happy in my life, except the time, a few years later, when the Rev. J. H. Twichell and I walked to Boston and he had the celebrated conversation with the hostler at the Inn at Ashford, Connecticut.
There was an hour and a half of non-stop disaster after that, and if it was wrong to enjoy it, it doesn’t matter—I did enjoy it. It’s been half a lifetime ago, but I still enjoy it every time I think of it. George had one failure after another. His anger grew with each[Pg 682] failure as he kept track of them. With every setback, he ripped off another piece of his clothing, and every time he started a new inning, he went for "double or quits" again. Twice he reached thirty and fell apart; once he got to thirty-one and broke down. Those "almosts" drove him crazy, and I don’t think I’ve ever been as happy in my life, except for the time, a few years later, when the Rev. J. H. Twichell and I walked to Boston and he had that famous conversation with the hostler at the Inn at Ashford, Connecticut.
At last, when we were notified that Patrick was at the door to drive him to his train, George owed me five thousand cigars at twenty-five cents apiece, and I was so sorry I could have hugged him. But he shouted,
At last, when we were told that Patrick was at the door to drive him to his train, George owed me five thousand cigars at twenty-five cents each, and I was so happy I could have hugged him. But he shouted,
"Give me ten minutes more!" and added stormily, "it's double or quits again, and I'll win out free of debt or owe you ten thousand cigars, and you'll pay the funeral expenses."
"Give me ten more minutes!" he said angrily. "It's all or nothing again, and I'll either come out debt-free or owe you ten thousand cigars, and you'll cover the funeral costs."
He began on his final effort, and I believe that in all my experience among both amateurs and experts, I have never seen a cue so carefully handled in my lifetime as George handled his upon this intensely interesting occasion. He got safely up to twenty-five, and then ceased to breathe. So did I. He labored along, and added a point, another point, still another point, and finally reached thirty-one. He stopped there, and we took a breath. By this time the balls were scattered all down the cushions, about a foot or two apart, and there wasn't a shot in sight anywhere that any man might hope to make. In a burst of anger and confessed defeat, he sent his ball flying around the table at random, and it crotched a ball that was packed against the cushion and sprang across to a ball against the bank on the opposite side, and counted!
He began his final push, and honestly, in all my time with both amateurs and pros, I've never seen someone handle a cue as carefully as George did on this incredibly interesting occasion. He made it up to twenty-five, and then he stopped breathing. So did I. He pushed on and added a point, then another, and finally hit thirty-one. He paused there, and we both took a breath. By then, the balls were scattered all over the table, about a foot or two apart, and there wasn’t a shot anywhere that anyone could realistically make. In a fit of anger and acknowledged defeat, he sent his ball flying randomly around the table, and it hit a ball that was pressed against the cushion and then bounced across to another ball against the bank on the opposite side, and it counted!
His luck had set him free, and he didn't owe me anything. He had used up all his spare time, but we carried his clothes to the carriage, and he dressed on his way to the station, greatly wondered at and admired by the ladies, as he drove along—but he got his train.
His luck had set him free, and he didn't owe me anything. He had used up all his spare time, but we took his clothes to the carriage, and he got dressed on his way to the station, drawing curious glances and admiration from the ladies as he drove by—but he caught his train.
I am very fond of Mr. Dooley, and shall await his coming with affectionate and pecuniary interest.
I really like Mr. Dooley and will look forward to his arrival with both warmth and financial curiosity.
P.S. Saturday. He has been here. Let us not talk about it.
P.S. Saturday. He was here. Let's not discuss it.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
FOOTNOTE:
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXIII.
APRIL 19, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XVI.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated January 12th, 1905.] ... But I am used to having my statements discounted. My mother began it before I was seven years old. Yet all through my life my facts have had a substratum of truth, and therefore they were not without preciousness. Any person who is familiar with me knows how to strike my average, and therefore knows how to get at the jewel of any fact of mine and dig it out of its blue-clay matrix. My mother knew that art. When I was seven or eight, or ten, or twelve years old—along there—a neighbor said to her,
[Dictated January 12th, 1905.] ... But I’ve learned to have my statements overlooked. My mom started that before I turned seven. Still, throughout my life, my facts have had a core of truth, and so they weren't without value. Anyone who knows me understands how to read between the lines, and therefore knows how to find the treasure in any of my facts and extract it from its unrefined state. My mom had that skill. When I was around seven or eight, or ten, or twelve years old—somewhere in there—a neighbor told her,
"Do you ever believe anything that that boy says?"
"Do you ever believe anything that guy says?"
My mother said,
My mom said,
[Pg 786]"He is the well-spring of truth, but you can't bring up the whole well with one bucket"—and she added, "I know his average, therefore he never deceives me. I discount him thirty per cent. for embroidery, and what is left is perfect and priceless truth, without a flaw in it anywhere."
[Pg 786]"He is the source of truth, but you can't pull up the entire well with just one bucket"—and she added, "I know his usual style, so he never tricks me. I take off thirty percent for exaggeration, and what's left is pure and valuable truth, with no imperfections at all."
Now to make a jump of forty years, without breaking the connection: that word "embroidery" was used again in my presence and concerning me, when I was fifty years old, one night at Rev. Frank Goodwin's house in Hartford, at a meeting of the Monday Evening Club. The Monday Evening Club still exists. It was founded about forty-five years ago by that theological giant, Rev. Dr. Bushnell, and some comrades of his, men of large intellectual calibre and more or less distinction, local or national. I was admitted to membership in it in the fall of 1871 and was an active member thenceforth until I left Hartford in the summer of 1891. The membership was restricted, in those days, to eighteen—possibly twenty. The meetings began about the 1st of October and were held in the private houses of the members every fortnight thereafter throughout the cold months until the 1st of May. Usually there were a dozen members present—sometimes as many as fifteen. There was an essay and a discussion. The essayists followed each other in alphabetical order through the season. The essayist could choose his own subject and talk twenty minutes on it, from MS. or orally, according to his preference. Then the discussion followed, and each member present was allowed ten minutes in which to express his views. The wives of these people were always present. It was their privilege. It was also their privilege to keep still; they were not allowed to throw any light upon the discussion. After the discussion there was a supper, and talk, and cigars. This supper began at ten o'clock promptly, and the company broke up and went away at midnight. At least they did except upon one occasion. In my recent Birthday speech I remarked upon the fact that I have always bought cheap cigars, and that is true. I have never bought costly ones.
Now, let's fast forward forty years without losing the connection: the word "embroidery" came up again in relation to me when I was fifty years old, one night at Rev. Frank Goodwin's house in Hartford during a meeting of the Monday Evening Club. The Monday Evening Club still exists. It was founded about forty-five years ago by the great theologian, Rev. Dr. Bushnell, along with some of his peers, who were all intellectually impressive and somewhat distinguished, either locally or nationally. I joined the club in the fall of 1871 and was an active member until I left Hartford in the summer of 1891. Back then, membership was limited to eighteen—maybe twenty. The meetings started around October 1st and took place in members' homes every two weeks throughout the winter months until May 1st. Typically, there were a dozen members present—sometimes as many as fifteen. Each meeting featured an essay and a discussion. Essayists took turns in alphabetical order throughout the season. They could choose their own topics and speak for twenty minutes, either from a manuscript or orally, depending on their preference. After that, we’d have a discussion where each present member could express their thoughts for ten minutes. The wives of the members always attended; it was their right. They could choose to stay silent and weren’t allowed to contribute to the discussions. After the discussion, there was a supper, more conversation, and cigars. This supper started promptly at ten o'clock, and everyone usually left by midnight, except for one occasion. In my recent birthday speech, I mentioned that I have always bought cheap cigars, which is true. I've never purchased expensive ones.
Well, that night at the Club meeting—as I was saying—George, our colored butler, came to me when the supper was nearly over, and I noticed that he was pale. Normally his complexion was a clear black, and very handsome, but now it had modified to old amber. He said:
Well, that night at the Club meeting—as I was saying—George, our Black butler, came to me when supper was almost over, and I noticed that he looked pale. Normally his skin was a deep black, and very handsome, but now it had changed to a dull amber. He said:
[Pg 787]"Mr. Clemens, what are we going to do? There is not a cigar in the house but those old Wheeling long nines. Can't nobody smoke them but you. They kill at thirty yards. It is too late to telephone—we couldn't get any cigars out from town—what can we do? Ain't it best to say nothing, and let on that we didn't think?"
[Pg 787]"Mr. Clemens, what are we going to do? There aren't any cigars in the house except those old Wheeling long nines. No one can smoke them except you. They’re terrible at thirty yards. It’s too late to call—we won’t be able to get any cigars from town—what should we do? Isn’t it best to stay quiet and pretend we didn't think of it?"
"No," I said, "that would not be honest. Fetch out the long nines"—which he did.
"No," I said, "that wouldn't be honest. Bring out the long nines"—which he did.
I had just come across those "long nines" a few days or a week before. I hadn't seen a long nine for years. When I was a cub pilot on the Mississippi in the late '50's, I had had a great affection for them, because they were not only—to my mind—perfect, but you could get a basketful of them for a cent—or a dime, they didn't use cents out there in those days. So when I saw them advertised in Hartford I sent for a thousand at once. They came out to me in badly battered and disreputable-looking old square pasteboard boxes, two hundred in a box. George brought a box, which was caved in on all sides, looking the worst it could, and began to pass them around. The conversation had been brilliantly animated up to that moment—but now a frost fell upon the company. That is to say, not all of a sudden, but the frost fell upon each man as he took up a cigar and held it poised in the air—and there, in the middle, his sentence broke off. That kind of thing went on all around the table, until when George had completed his crime the whole place was full of a thick solemnity and silence.
I had just come across those "long nines" a few days or a week ago. I hadn't seen a long nine in years. When I was a junior pilot on the Mississippi in the late '50s, I was really fond of them because they were, in my opinion, perfect, and you could get a bunch of them for a cent—or a dime; they didn’t use cents out there back then. So when I saw them advertised in Hartford, I ordered a thousand right away. They arrived in badly damaged and shabby old square cardboard boxes, two hundred in each box. George brought over a box that was crushed on all sides, looking as terrible as possible, and started passing them around. The conversation had been lively until that moment—but then an awkward silence fell over the group. Not all at once, but the silence settled on each person as they picked up a cigar and held it in the air—and right there, in the middle of their sentences, they suddenly stopped talking. This went on all around the table, and by the time George had finished his task, the whole place was filled with a heavy sense of solemnity and silence.
Those men began to light the cigars. Rev. Dr. Parker was the first man to light. He took three or four heroic whiffs—then gave it up. He got up with the remark that he had to go to the bedside of a sick parishioner. He started out. Rev. Dr. Burton was the next man. He took only one whiff, and followed Parker. He furnished a pretext, and you could see by the sound of his voice that he didn't think much of the pretext, and was vexed with Parker for getting in ahead with a fictitious ailing client. Rev. Mr. Twichell followed, and said he had to go now because he must take the midnight train for Boston. Boston was the first place that occurred to him, I suppose.
The men started lighting their cigars. Rev. Dr. Parker was the first. He took a few deep puffs—then gave up. He stood up, saying he needed to check on a sick parishioner. He left. Rev. Dr. Burton was next. He only took one puff and followed Parker out. He used Parker's excuse, but you could tell by his tone that he wasn’t convinced and was annoyed with Parker for using a fake reason. Rev. Mr. Twichell went next, saying he had to leave because he needed to catch the midnight train to Boston. I guess Boston was the first place that popped into his head.
It was only a quarter to eleven when they began to distribute pretexts. At ten minutes to eleven all those people were out of the house. When nobody was left but George and me I was[Pg 788] cheerful—I had no compunctions of conscience, no griefs of any kind. But George was beyond speech, because he held the honor and credit of the family above his own, and he was ashamed that this smirch had been put upon it. I told him to go to bed and try to sleep it off. I went to bed myself. At breakfast in the morning when George was passing a cup of coffee, I saw it tremble in his hand. I knew by that sign that there was something on his mind. He brought the cup to me and asked impressively,
It was just a quarter to eleven when they started handing out excuses. By ten minutes to eleven, everyone had left the house. With only George and me left, I felt pretty upbeat—I had no guilty feelings or any kind of sadness. But George was speechless because he valued the family's honor more than his own, and he felt ashamed that this stain had been placed on it. I told him to go to bed and try to sleep it off. I went to bed myself. At breakfast the next morning, when George was passing a cup of coffee, I noticed it shaking in his hand. That told me he had something on his mind. He brought the cup to me and asked seriously,
"Mr. Clemens, how far is it from the front door to the upper gate?"
"Mr. Clemens, how far is it from the front door to the upper gate?"
I said, "It is a hundred and twenty-five steps."
I said, "It's one hundred twenty-five steps."
He said, "Mr. Clemens, you can start at the front door and you can go plumb to the upper gate and tread on one of them cigars every time."
He said, "Mr. Clemens, you can start at the front door and walk all the way to the upper gate, stepping on one of those cigars every time."
It wasn't true in detail, but in essentials it was.
It wasn't completely accurate, but it was true in the main points.
The subject under discussion on the night in question was Dreams. The talk passed from mouth to mouth in the usual serene way.
The topic being discussed that night was Dreams. The conversation flowed easily from one person to another, just like it always does.
I do not now remember what form my views concerning dreams took at the time. I don't remember now what my notion about dreams was then, but I do remember telling a dream by way of illustrating some detail of my speech, and I also remember that when I had finished it Rev. Dr. Burton made that doubting remark which contained that word I have already spoken of as having been uttered by my mother, in some such connection, forty or fifty years before. I was probably engaged in trying to make those people believe that now and then, by some accident, or otherwise, a dream which was prophetic turned up in the dreamer's mind. The date of my memorable dream was about the beginning of May, 1858. It was a remarkable dream, and I had been telling it several times every year for more than fifteen years—and now I was telling it again, here in the club.
I don’t remember what I thought about dreams back then. I can’t recall my beliefs about dreams at that time, but I do remember sharing a dream to highlight a point in my speech, and I also recall that when I finished, Rev. Dr. Burton made a skeptical comment that included that word I’ve mentioned my mother used, something she said about forty or fifty years ago. I was likely trying to convince those people that occasionally, due to chance or some other reason, a prophetic dream could occur in someone's mind. My memorable dream happened around early May 1858. It was quite a significant dream, and I had shared it several times each year for over fifteen years—and now I was sharing it again, here in the club.
In 1858 I was a steersman on board the swift and popular New Orleans and St. Louis packet, "Pennsylvania," Captain Kleinfelter. I had been lent to Mr. Brown, one of the pilots of the "Pennsylvania," by my owner, Mr. Horace E. Bixby, and I had been steering for Brown about eighteen months, I think. Then in the early days of May, 1858, came a tragic trip—the last trip of that fleet and famous steamboat. I have told all about it in one of my books called "Old Times on the Mississippi."[Pg 789] But it is not likely that I told the dream in that book. It is impossible that I can ever have published it, I think, because I never wanted my mother to know about the dream, and she lived several years after I published that volume.
In 1858, I was a steersman on the fast and popular New Orleans and St. Louis packet, "Pennsylvania," under Captain Kleinfelter. My owner, Mr. Horace E. Bixby, had lent me to Mr. Brown, one of the pilots of the "Pennsylvania," and I had been steering for Brown for about eighteen months, I believe. Then, in early May 1858, came a tragic trip—the last journey of that well-known steamboat. I've shared the details in one of my books called "Old Times on the Mississippi." But I probably didn’t include the dream in that book. I doubt I ever published it because I never wanted my mother to know about the dream, and she lived several years after I released that volume.
I had found a place on the "Pennsylvania" for my brother Henry, who was two years my junior. It was not a place of profit, it was only a place of promise. He was "mud" clerk. Mud clerks received no salary, but they were in the line of promotion. They could become, presently, third clerk and second clerk, then chief clerk—that is to say, purser. The dream begins when Henry had been mud clerk about three months. We were lying in port at St. Louis. Pilots and steersmen had nothing to do during the three days that the boat lay in port in St. Louis and New Orleans, but the mud clerk had to begin his labors at dawn and continue them into the night, by the light of pine-knot torches. Henry and I, moneyless and unsalaried, had billeted ourselves upon our brother-in-law, Mr. Moffet, as night lodgers while in port. We took our meals on board the boat. No, I mean I lodged at the house, not Henry. He spent the evenings at the house, from nine until eleven, then went to the boat to be ready for his early duties. On the night of the dream he started away at eleven, shaking hands with the family, and said good-by according to custom. I may mention that hand-shaking as a good-by was not merely the custom of that family, but the custom of the region—the custom of Missouri, I may say. In all my life, up to that time, I had never seen one member of the Clemens family kiss another one—except once. When my father lay dying in our home in Hannibal—the 24th of March, 1847—he put his arm around my sister's neck and drew her down and kissed her, saying "Let me die." I remember that, and I remember the death rattle which swiftly followed those words, which were his last. These good-bys of Henry's were always executed in the family sitting-room on the second floor, and Henry went from that room and down-stairs without further ceremony. But this time my mother went with him to the head of the stairs and said good-by again. As I remember it she was moved to this by something in Henry's manner, and she remained at the head of the stairs while he descended. When he reached the door he hesitated, and climbed the stairs and shook hands good-by once more.
I had found a position on the "Pennsylvania" for my brother Henry, who was two years younger than me. It wasn’t a paid job, just a position with potential. He was a “mud” clerk. Mud clerks didn’t earn a salary, but they were on the path to advancement. They could eventually become third clerk, then second clerk, and finally chief clerk, which meant purser. The dream started after Henry had been a mud clerk for about three months. We were docked in St. Louis. While pilots and steersmen had no work during the three days the boat was in St. Louis and New Orleans, the mud clerk had to start his duties at dawn and keep working into the night, using pine-knot torches for light. Henry and I, without any money or salary, had moved in with our brother-in-law, Mr. Moffet, as night guests while in port. We had our meals on the boat. Actually, I stayed at the house, not Henry. He spent the **evenings** at the house, from nine until eleven, then headed to the boat to be ready for his early shift. On the night of the dream, he left at eleven, shook hands with the family, and said goodbye, just like usual. I should mention that shaking hands as a goodbye was not only their family custom, but also a common practice in the region—Missouri, to be specific. Throughout my life until that point, I had never seen any member of the Clemens family kiss another—except for one instance. When my father was dying in our home in Hannibal on March 24, 1847, he wrapped his arm around my sister’s neck, pulled her close, and kissed her, saying, “Let me die.” I remember that moment and the death rattle that quickly followed those words, his last. Henry’s goodbyes always took place in the family sitting room on the second floor, and he would leave that room and head downstairs without any further ceremony. But this time, my mother accompanied him to the top of the stairs and said goodbye **again**. I recall that she felt compelled to do this because of something in Henry’s demeanor, and she stayed at the top of the stairs while he went down. When he reached the door, he hesitated, then climbed back up the stairs and shook hands goodbye once more.
[Pg 790]In the morning, when I awoke I had been dreaming, and the dream was so vivid, so like reality, that it deceived me, and I thought it was real. In the dream I had seen Henry a corpse. He lay in a metallic burial-case. He was dressed in a suit of my clothing, and on his breast lay a great bouquet of flowers, mainly white roses, with a red rose in the centre. The casket stood upon a couple of chairs. I dressed, and moved toward that door, thinking I would go in there and look at it, but I changed my mind. I thought I could not yet bear to meet my mother. I thought I would wait awhile and make some preparation for that ordeal. The house was in Locust Street, a little above 13th, and I walked to 14th, and to the middle of the block beyond, before it suddenly flashed upon me that there was nothing real about this—it was only a dream. I can still feel something of the grateful upheaval of joy of that moment, and I can also still feel the remnant of doubt, the suspicion that maybe it was real, after all. I returned to the house almost on a run, flew up the stairs two or three steps at a jump, and rushed into that sitting-room—and was made glad again, for there was no casket there.
[Pg 790]In the morning, when I woke up, I realized I had been dreaming, and the dream felt so real that it tricked me into thinking it was actual. In the dream, I had seen Henry as a corpse. He was lying in a metallic casket, dressed in my clothes, with a large bouquet of flowers—mostly white roses and a red rose in the center—resting on his chest. The casket was set on a couple of chairs. I got dressed and started to walk toward that door, thinking I would go in and look at it, but then I changed my mind. I figured I wasn't ready to face my mother yet, so I decided to wait a bit and prepare myself for that moment. The house was on Locust Street, just above 13th, and I walked to 14th and halfway down the block before it suddenly hit me that none of this was real—it was just a dream. I can still feel the wave of relief and joy that rushed over me at that moment, along with a lingering doubt, wondering if maybe it actually was real after all. I hurried back to the house, practically running up the stairs two or three steps at a time, and rushed into the sitting room—and felt happy again because there was no casket there.
We made the usual eventless trip to New Orleans—no, it was not eventless, for it was on the way down that I had the fight with Mr. Brown[8] which resulted in his requiring that I be left ashore at New Orleans. In New Orleans I always had a job. It was my privilege to watch the freight-piles from seven in the evening until seven in the morning, and get three dollars for it. It was a three-night job and occurred every thirty-five days. Henry always joined my watch about nine in the evening, when his own duties were ended, and we often walked my rounds and chatted together until midnight. This time we were to part, and so the night before the boat sailed I gave Henry some advice. I said, "In case of disaster to the boat, don't lose your head—leave that unwisdom to the passengers—they are competent—they'll attend to it. But you rush for the hurricane-deck, and astern to one of the life-boats lashed aft the wheel-house, and obey the mate's orders—thus you will be useful. When the boat is launched, give such help as you can in getting the women and children into it, and be sure you don't try to get into it yourself. It is summer weather, the river is only a mile wide, as a rule, and[Pg 791] you can swim that without any trouble." Two or three days afterward the boat's boilers exploded at Ship Island, below Memphis, early one morning—and what happened afterward I have already told in "Old Times on the Mississippi." As related there, I followed the "Pennsylvania" about a day later, on another boat, and we began to get news of the disaster at every port we touched at, and so by the time we reached Memphis we knew all about it.
We made the usual uneventful trip to New Orleans—well, it wasn’t really uneventful, because on the way down, I got into a fight with Mr. Brown[8] which led to him insisting that I be left behind in New Orleans. I always had a job in New Orleans. My duty was to watch over the freight piles from 7 PM to 7 AM and I got paid three dollars for it. It was a three-night gig that happened every thirty-five days. Henry would usually join me around 9 PM, after his own duties were done, and we’d often walk my rounds and chat until midnight. This time we were going to part ways, so the night before the boat left, I gave Henry some advice. I said, "If the boat gets into trouble, don’t panic—leave the chaos to the passengers—they’re capable—they’ll handle it. But you should head for the hurricane-deck and then to one of the life-boats secured behind the wheel-house, and follow the mate's instructions—this way, you’ll be helpful. When the boat is launched, assist as much as you can in getting the women and children into it, and make sure you don’t try to get in yourself. It’s summer weather, the river is only about a mile wide most of the time, and[Pg 791] you can swim that without any trouble." A few days later, the boat’s boilers exploded at Ship Island, below Memphis, early one morning—and what happened next I’ve already detailed in "Old Times on the Mississippi." As I mentioned there, I followed the "Pennsylvania" about a day later on another boat, and we began to hear updates about the disaster at every port we stopped at. By the time we got to Memphis, we knew everything.
I found Henry stretched upon a mattress on the floor of a great building, along with thirty or forty other scalded and wounded persons, and was promptly informed, by some indiscreet person, that he had inhaled steam; that his body was badly scalded, and that he would live but a little while; also, I was told that the physicians and nurses were giving their whole attention to persons who had a chance of being saved. They were short-handed in the matter of physicians and nurses; and Henry and such others as were considered to be fatally hurt were receiving only such attention as could be spared, from time to time, from the more urgent cases. But Dr. Peyton, a fine and large-hearted old physician of great reputation in the community, gave me his sympathy and took vigorous hold of the case, and in about a week he had brought Henry around. Dr. Peyton never committed himself with prognostications which might not materialize, but at eleven o'clock one night he told me that Henry was out of danger, and would get well. Then he said, "At midnight these poor fellows lying here and there all over this place will begin to mourn and mutter and lament and make outcries, and if this commotion should disturb Henry it will be bad for him; therefore ask the physician on watch to give him an eighth of a grain of morphine, but this is not to be done unless Henry shall show signs that he is being disturbed."
I found Henry lying on a mattress on the floor of a large building, alongside thirty or forty other scalded and injured people. Someone indiscreetly told me that he had inhaled steam, that his body was badly burned, and that he wouldn't survive much longer. I was also informed that the doctors and nurses were focusing all their attention on those with a chance of being saved. They were short-staffed when it came to doctors and nurses, and Henry, along with others deemed fatally hurt, was receiving only the limited care that could be spared from the more urgent cases. However, Dr. Peyton, a kind and respected old physician in the community, expressed his sympathy and took charge of the case, and within about a week, he had managed to stabilize Henry. Dr. Peyton never made any predictions that might not come true, but one night at eleven o'clock, he told me that Henry was out of danger and would recover. Then he said, "At midnight, these poor guys lying around here will start to mourn, mutter, lament, and make noise. If this commotion disturbs Henry, it could be harmful for him. So, please ask the doctor on duty to give him an eighth of a grain of morphine, but only if Henry starts showing signs of being disturbed."
Oh well, never mind the rest of it. The physicians on watch were young fellows hardly out of the medical college, and they made a mistake—they had no way of measuring the eighth of a grain of morphine, so they guessed at it and gave him a vast quantity heaped on the end of a knife-blade, and the fatal effects were soon apparent. I think he died about dawn, I don't remember as to that. He was carried to the dead-room and I went away for a while to a citizen's house and slept off some of my accumulated fatigue—and meantime something was happening. The coffins provided for the dead were of unpainted white[Pg 792] pine, but in this instance some of the ladies of Memphis had made up a fund of sixty dollars and bought a metallic case, and when I came back and entered the dead-room Henry lay in that open case, and he was dressed in a suit of my clothing. He had borrowed it without my knowledge during our last sojourn in St. Louis; and I recognized instantly that my dream of several weeks before was here exactly reproduced, so far as these details went—and I think I missed one detail; but that one was immediately supplied, for just then an elderly lady entered the place with a large bouquet consisting mainly of white roses, and in the centre of it was a red rose, and she laid it on his breast.
Oh well, never mind the rest of it. The doctors on duty were young guys barely out of medical school, and they made a mistake—they didn't have a way to measure an eighth of a grain of morphine, so they guessed and gave him a huge dose piled on the end of a knife blade, and the deadly effects were quick to show. I think he died around dawn; I can't quite remember that part. He was taken to the morgue, and I went to a local's house to crash for a bit and catch up on some much-needed rest—and in the meantime, something was happening. The coffins for the deceased were made of unpainted white[Pg 792] pine, but in this case, some ladies from Memphis had collected sixty dollars and bought a metal casket. When I returned and walked into the morgue, Henry was lying in that open casket, dressed in a suit that was mine. He had borrowed it without telling me during our last stay in St. Louis; and I immediately recognized that my dream from several weeks earlier was being played out exactly with these details—and I think I missed one detail; but that one was soon provided, because just then an older lady walked in with a large bouquet mostly made up of white roses, and in the center was a red rose, which she laid on his chest.
I told the dream there in the Club that night just as I have told it here.
I shared the dream there in the Club that night exactly how I’ve shared it here.
Rev. Dr. Burton swung his leonine head around, focussed me with his eye, and said:
Rev. Dr. Burton turned his lion-like head, locked eyes with me, and said:
"When was it that this happened?"
"When did this occur?"
"In June, '58."
"In June 1958."
"It is a good many years ago. Have you told it several times since?"
"It was many years ago. Have you shared it a few times since then?"
"Yes, I have, a good many times."
"Yeah, I have, quite a few times."
"How many?"
"How many are there?"
"Why, I don't know how many."
"Honestly, I have no idea how many."
"Well, strike an average. How many times a year do you think you have told it?"
"Well, let's take a guess. How many times a year do you think you've told it?"
"Well, I have told it as many as six times a year, possibly oftener."
"Well, I've shared it as many as six times a year, maybe even more."
"Very well, then you've told it, we'll say, seventy or eighty times since it happened?"
"Alright, so you've said it, what, seventy or eighty times since it happened?"
"Yes," I said, "that's a conservative estimate."
"Yeah," I said, "that's a conservative estimate."
"Now then, Mark, a very extraordinary thing happened to me a great many years ago, and I used to tell it a number of times—a good many times—every year, for it was so wonderful that it always astonished the hearer, and that astonishment gave me a distinct pleasure every time. I never suspected that that tale was acquiring any auxiliary advantages through repetition until one day after I had been telling it ten or fifteen years it struck me that either I was getting old, and slow in delivery, or that the tale was longer than it was when it was born. Mark, I diligently and prayerfully examined that tale with this result: that I found that its proportions were now, as nearly as I[Pg 793] could make oat, one part fact, straight fact, fact pure and undiluted, golden fact, and twenty-four parts embroidery. I never told that tale afterwards—I was never able to tell it again, for I had lost confidence in it, and so the pleasure of telling it was gone, and gone permanently. How much of this tale of yours is embroidery?"
"Okay, Mark, something really extraordinary happened to me a long time ago, and I used to share it a lot—many times—every year, because it was so amazing that it always surprised the listeners, and that surprise brought me a unique joy each time. I never realized that the story was gaining extra layers from being told repeatedly until one day, after telling it for ten or fifteen years, it hit me that either I was getting older and slower at telling it, or that the story had grown longer than it was when it first happened. Mark, I carefully and seriously examined that story, and I found that its makeup was now, as nearly as I could tell, one part pure fact—golden fact— and twenty-four parts embellishment. I never told that story again—I just couldn’t, because I lost my confidence in it, and with that, the joy of telling it was gone, and it was gone for good. How much of your story is just embellishment?"
"Well," I said, "I don't know. I don't think any of it is embroidery. I think it is all just as I have stated it, detail by detail."
"Well," I said, "I don't know. I don't think any of it is embroidery. I think it's all exactly as I said it, detail by detail."
"Very well," he said, "then it is all right, but I wouldn't tell it any more; because if you keep on, it will begin to collect embroidery sure. The safest thing is to stop now."
"Alright," he said, "then it's fine, but I wouldn't mention it again; because if you keep going, it'll start to gather embellishments for sure. The best thing to do is stop now."
That was a great many years ago. And to-day is the first time that I have told that dream since Dr. Burton scared me into fatal doubts about it. No, I don't believe I can say that. I don't believe that I ever really had any doubts whatever concerning the salient points of the dream, for those points are of such a nature that they are pictures, and pictures can be remembered, when they are vivid, much better than one can remember remarks and unconcreted facts. Although it has been so many years since I have told that dream, I can see those pictures now just as clearly defined as if they were before me in this room. I have not told the entire dream. There was a good deal more of it. I mean I have not told all that happened in the dream's fulfilment. After the incident in the death-room I may mention one detail, and that is this. When I arrived in St. Louis with the casket it was about eight o'clock in the morning, and I ran to my brother-in-law's place of business, hoping to find him there, but I missed him, for while I was on the way to his office he was on his way from the house to the boat. When I got back to the boat the casket was gone. He had conveyed it out to his house. I hastened thither, and when I arrived the men were just removing the casket from the vehicle to carry it up-stairs. I stopped that procedure, for I did not want my mother to see the dead face, because one side of it was drawn and distorted by the effects of the opium. When I went up-stairs, there stood the two chairs—placed to receive the coffin—just as I had seen them in my dream; and if I had arrived two or three minutes later, the casket would have been resting upon them, precisely as in my dream of several weeks before.
That was a long time ago. And today is the first time I've shared that dream since Dr. Burton made me seriously question it. No, I can't really say that. I don’t think I ever truly doubted the main aspects of the dream, because those aspects are like pictures, and vivid images are much easier to remember than casual comments or vague facts. Even though it’s been so many years since I talked about that dream, I can still see those images clearly in my mind as if they were right in front of me in this room. I haven’t shared the whole dream. There was a lot more to it. I mean, I haven’t shared everything that happened during the dream's aftermath. After the incident in the death-room, I should mention one detail: when I arrived in St. Louis with the casket, it was around eight o'clock in the morning, and I rushed to my brother-in-law’s workplace, hoping to find him there, but I missed him. While I was heading to his office, he was on his way from the house to the boat. When I got back to the boat, the casket was gone. He had taken it to his house. I quickly went there, and when I arrived, the men were just about to take the casket out of the vehicle to carry it upstairs. I stopped them because I didn’t want my mother to see the dead face, as one side was drawn and distorted from the opium. When I went upstairs, the two chairs were set up to hold the coffin, just as I had seen them in my dream; and if I had arrived two or three minutes later, the casket would have been resting on them exactly like in the dream I had weeks earlier.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXIV.
MAY 3, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XVII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
From Susy's Biography of Me.
From Susy's Bio of Me.
Sept. 9, '85.—Mamma is teaching Jean a little natural history and is making a little collection of insects for her. But mamma does not allow Jean to kill any insects she only collects those insects that are found dead. Mamma has told us all, perticularly Jean, to bring her all the little dead insects that she finds. The other day as we were all sitting at supper Jean broke into the room and ran triumfantly up to Mamma and presented her with a plate full of dead flies. Mamma thanked Jean vary enthusiastically although she with difficulty concealed her amusement. Just then Soar Mash entered the room and Jean believing her hungry asked Mamma for permission to give her the flies. Mamma laughingly consented and the flies almost immediately dissapeared.
Sept. 9, '85.—Mom is teaching Jean a little bit of natural history and is putting together a small collection of insects for her. However, Mom only collects insects that are already dead; she doesn’t allow Jean to kill any. Mom has asked all of us, especially Jean, to bring her any little dead insects we find. The other day, while we were having dinner, Jean burst into the room and ran up to Mom, proudly showing her a plate full of dead flies. Mom thanked Jean very enthusiastically, even though she had a hard time holding back her laughter. Just then, Soar Mash walked into the room, and Jean, thinking she was hungry, asked Mom if she could give her the flies. Mom laughed and agreed, and the flies disappeared almost instantly.
[Pg 2][Monday, October 15, 1906.] Sour Hash's presence indicates that this adventure occurred at Quarry Farm. Susy's Biography interests itself pretty exclusively with historical facts; where they happen is not a matter of much concern to her. When other historians refer to the Bunker Hill Monument they know it is not necessary to mention that that monument is in Boston. Susy recognizes that when she mentions Sour Mash it is not necessary to localize her. To Susy, Sour Mash is the Bunker Hill Monument of Quarry Farm.
[Pg 2][Monday, October 15, 1906.] Sour Hash's presence shows that this adventure took place at Quarry Farm. Susy's Biography focuses mainly on historical facts; where they occur isn’t really important to her. When other historians talk about the Bunker Hill Monument, they don’t need to specify that it’s in Boston. Susy gets that when she mentions Sour Mash, there's no need to localize it. To her, Sour Mash is the Bunker Hill Monument of Quarry Farm.
Ordinary cats have some partiality for living flies, but none for dead ones; but Susy does not trouble herself to apologize for Sour Mash's eccentricities of taste. This Biography was for us, and Susy knew that nothing that Sour Mash might do could startle us or need explanation, we being aware that she was not an ordinary cat, but moving upon a plane far above the prejudices and superstitions which are law to common catdom.
Ordinary cats have a preference for live flies, but not for dead ones; however, Susy doesn’t bother to apologize for Sour Mash's quirky tastes. This Biography was for us, and Susy understood that nothing Sour Mash did could surprise us or require an explanation, since we knew she wasn’t an ordinary cat, but operating on a level well above the biases and superstitions that govern regular cats.
Once in Hartford the flies were so numerous for a time, and so troublesome, that Mrs. Clemens conceived the idea of paying George[9] a bounty on all the flies he might kill. The children saw an opportunity here for the acquisition of sudden wealth. They supposed that their mother merely wanted to accumulate dead flies, for some æsthetic or scientific reason or other, and they judged that the more flies she could get the happier she would be; so they went into business with George on a commission. Straightway the dead flies began to arrive in such quantities that Mrs. Clemens was pleased beyond words with the success of her idea. Next, she was astonished that one house could furnish so many. She was paying an extravagantly high bounty, and it presently began to look as if by this addition to our expenses we were now probably living beyond our income. After a few days there was peace and comfort; not a fly was discoverable in the house: there wasn't a straggler left. Still, to Mrs. Clement's surprise, the dead flies continued to arrive by the plateful, and the bounty expense was as crushing as ever. Then she made inquiry, and found that our innocent little rascals had established a Fly Trust, and had hired all the children in the neighborhood to collect flies on a cheap and unburdensome commission.
Once they got to Hartford, the flies were so numerous for a while and so annoying that Mrs. Clemens came up with the idea of paying George[9] a bounty for every fly he killed. The kids saw an opportunity to make some quick cash. They figured their mom just wanted to gather dead flies for some aesthetic or scientific reason and thought the more flies she collected, the happier she’d be. So, they teamed up with George on a commission basis. Soon, the dead flies started pouring in so much that Mrs. Clemens was thrilled with how well her idea was working. Next, she was amazed that one house could produce so many. She was paying a ridiculously high bounty, and it started to seem like we were living beyond our means because of this extra cost. After a few days, there was peace and comfort; not a single fly could be found in the house: not even one stray left. Still, to Mrs. Clemens's surprise, the dead flies kept coming in by the plateful, and the bounty expense was still overwhelming. Then she asked around and discovered that our innocent little kids had formed a Fly Trust and hired all the neighborhood children to gather flies for a low and easy commission.
Mrs. Clemens's experience in this matter was a new one for[Pg 3] her, but the governments of the world had tried it, and wept over it, and discarded it, every half-century since man was created. Any Government could have told her that the best way to increase wolves in America, rabbits in Australia, and snakes in India, is to pay a bounty on their scalps. Then every patriot goes to raising them.
Mrs. Clemens's experience in this matter was new for[Pg 3] her, but the governments of the world had attempted it, regretted it, and abandoned it, every fifty years since humans came into being. Any government could have informed her that the best way to boost the populations of wolves in America, rabbits in Australia, and snakes in India is to offer a bounty on their hides. Then every patriot starts breeding them.
From Susy's Biography of Me.
From Susy's Biography of Me.
Sept. 10, '85.—The other evening Clara and I brought down our new soap bubble water and we all blew soap bubles. Papa blew his soap bubles and filled them with tobacco smoke and as the light shone on then they took very beautiful opaline colors. Papa would hold them and then let us catch them in our hand and they felt delightful to the touch the mixture of the smoke and water had a singularly pleasant effect.
Sept. 10, '85.—The other night, Clara and I brought out our new soap bubble solution, and we all blew bubbles. Dad blew his bubbles and filled them with tobacco smoke, and when the light hit them, they reflected stunning opaline colors. Dad would hold them and then let us catch them in our hands; they felt amazing to touch, and the blend of smoke and water created a uniquely enjoyable experience.
It is human life. We are blown upon the world; we float buoyantly upon the summer air a little while, complacently showing off our grace of form and our dainty iridescent colors; then we vanish with a little puff, leaving nothing behind but a memory—and sometimes not even that. I suppose that at those solemn times when we wake in the deeps of the night and reflect, there is not one of us who is not willing to confess that he is really only a soap-bubble, and as little worth the making.
It is human life. We’re tossed into the world; we drift lightly on the summer air for a short time, proudly displaying our shape and our delicate shimmering colors; then we disappear with a small pop, leaving nothing behind but a memory—and sometimes not even that. I guess that during those quiet moments when we wake up in the middle of the night and think, there isn't one of us who wouldn’t admit that he is really just a soap bubble, and just as little worth creating.
I remember those days of twenty-one years ago, and a certain pathos clings about them. Susy, with her manifold young charms and her iridescent mind, was as lovely a bubble as any we made that day—and as transitory. She passed, as they passed, in her youth and beauty, and nothing of her is left but a heartbreak and a memory. That long-vanished day came vividly back to me a few weeks ago when, for the first time in twenty-one years, I found myself again amusing a child with smoke-charged soap-bubbles.
I remember those days from twenty-one years ago, and there’s a certain sadness about them. Susy, with her many youthful charms and vibrant mind, was as beautiful a bubble as any we made that day—and just as fleeting. She faded away, like they did, in her youth and beauty, leaving nothing behind but a heartache and a memory. That long-gone day came back to me clearly a few weeks ago when, for the first time in twenty-one years, I found myself entertaining a child with smoke-filled soap bubbles.
Susy's next date is November 29th, 1885, the eve of my fiftieth birthday. It seems a good while ago. I must have been rather young for my age then, for I was trying to tame an old-fashioned bicycle nine feet high. It is to me almost unbelievable, at my present stage of life, that there have really been people willing to trust themselves upon a dizzy and unstable altitude like that, and that I was one of them. Twichell and I took lessons every day. He succeeded, and became a master of the art of riding that wild vehicle, but I had no gift in that direction and was never able to stay on mine long enough to get[Pg 4] any satisfactory view of the planet. Every time I tried to steal a look at a pretty girl, or any other kind of scenery, that single moment of inattention gave the bicycle the chance it had been waiting for, and I went over the front of it and struck the ground on my head or my back before I had time to realise that something was happening. I didn't always go over the front way; I had other ways, and practised them all; but no matter which way was chosen for me there was always one monotonous result—the bicycle skinned my leg and leaped up into the air and came down on top of me. Sometimes its wires were so sprung by this violent performance that it had the collapsed look of an umbrella that had had a misunderstanding with a cyclone. After each day's practice I arrived at home with my skin hanging in ribbons, from my knees down. I plastered the ribbons on where they belonged, and bound them there with handkerchiefs steeped in Pond's Extract, and was ready for more adventures next day. It was always a surprise to me that I had so much skin, and that it held out so well. There was always plenty, and I soon came to understand that the supply was going to remain sufficient for all my needs. It turned out that I had nine skins, in layers, one on top of the other like the leaves of a book, and some of the doctors said it was quite remarkable.
Susy's next date is November 29th, 1885, the night before my fiftieth birthday. That feels like a long time ago. I must have been pretty young for my age back then because I was trying to ride an old-fashioned bicycle that was nine feet tall. It's hard to believe now, at this point in my life, that there were actually people willing to trust themselves on such a dizzying and unstable height, and that I was one of them. Twichell and I took lessons every day. He got the hang of it and became skilled at riding that crazy bike, but I didn’t have the talent for it and could never stay on mine long enough to get any decent view of the world. Every time I tried to sneak a glance at a pretty girl or any other scenery, that moment of distraction was the perfect opportunity for the bike to throw me off, and I’d find myself crashing to the ground before I even realized what was happening. I didn’t always fall off the front; I had other ways of tipping over, and I practiced them all. But no matter how I fell, the result was always the same—the bike would scrape my leg and then bounce back up, landing right on top of me. Sometimes its wires got so bent from all the chaos that it looked like an umbrella that had had a rough encounter with a storm. After each day of practice, I came home with my skin in tatters from the knees down. I’d patch myself up, putting the pieces back where they belonged and wrapping them with handkerchiefs soaked in Pond’s Extract, ready for more adventures the next day. I was always surprised at how much skin I had and how well it held up. There was always plenty, and I soon realized that I’d have enough for all my needs. It turned out that I had nine layers of skin, one on top of the other like the pages of a book, and some of the doctors said it was quite impressive.
I was full of enthusiasm over this insane amusement. My teacher was a young German from the bicycle factory, a gentle, kindly, patient creature, with a pathetically grave face. He never smiled; he never made a remark; he always gathered me tenderly up when I plunged off, and helped me on again without a word. When he had been teaching me twice a day for three weeks I introduced a new gymnastic—one that he had never seen before—and so at last a compliment was wrung from him, a thing which I had been risking my life for days to achieve. He gathered me up and said mournfully: "Mr. Clemens, you can fall off a bicycle in more different ways than any person I ever saw before."
I was really excited about this crazy activity. My teacher was a young German from the bicycle factory, a gentle, kind, patient guy with a seriously serious face. He never smiled or made a comment; he always picked me up softly when I fell off and helped me get back on without saying a word. After teaching me twice a day for three weeks, I introduced a new trick—one he had never seen before—and finally, I got a compliment from him, something I had been trying to earn by risking my life for days. He picked me up and said sadly, "Mr. Clemens, you can fall off a bicycle in more ways than anyone I've ever seen."
A boy's life is not all comedy; much of the tragic enters into it. The drunken tramp—mentioned in "Tom Sawyer" or "Huck Finn"—who was burned up in the village jail, lay upon my conscience a hundred nights afterward and filled them with hideous dreams—dreams in which I saw his appealing face as I had seen it in the pathetic reality, pressed against the window-bars, with the red hell glowing behind him—a[Pg 5] face which seemed to say to me, "If you had not give me the matches, this would not have happened; you are responsible for my death." I was not responsible for it, for I had meant him no harm, but only good, when I let him have the matches; but no matter, mine was a trained Presbyterian conscience, and knew but the one duty—to hunt and harry its slave upon all pretexts and on all occasions; particularly when there was no sense or reason in it. The tramp—who was to blame—suffered ten minutes; I, who was not to blame, suffered three months.
A boy's life isn't just funny; a lot of tragedy comes into play. The drunken drifter—mentioned in "Tom Sawyer" or "Huck Finn"—who was burned in the village jail weighed on my mind for countless nights afterward, filling them with horrifying dreams. In those dreams, I saw his desperate face as I had seen it in real life, pressed against the window bars with a red glow of hell behind him—a face that seemed to say to me, "If you hadn't given me the matches, this wouldn't have happened; you're responsible for my death." I was not responsible for it, as I had only meant to help him when I handed over the matches. But it didn’t matter; I had a well-trained Presbyterian conscience that only knew one duty—to relentlessly pursue its slave under any excuse and at all times, especially when there was no sense or reason in it. The drifter—who was at fault—suffered for ten minutes; I, who was not at fault, suffered for three months.
The shooting down of poor old Smarr in the main street[10] at noonday supplied me with some more dreams; and in them I always saw again the grotesque closing picture—the great family Bible spread open on the profane old man's breast by some thoughtful idiot, and rising and sinking to the labored breathings, and adding the torture of its leaden weight to the dying struggles. We are curiously made. In all the throng of gaping and sympathetic onlookers there was not one with common sense enough to perceive that an anvil would have been in better taste there than the Bible, less open to sarcastic criticism, and swifter in its atrocious work. In my nightmares I gasped and struggled for breath under the crush of that vast book for many a night.
The shooting of poor old Smarr in the main street[10] at noon gave me more nightmares; in them, I always saw again the bizarre closing scene—the big family Bible laid open on the profane old man's chest by some well-meaning idiot, rising and falling with his labored breaths, and adding the weight of its heavy presence to his dying struggles. We are oddly constructed. Among the crowd of staring and sympathetic onlookers, not one had enough common sense to realize that an anvil would have been more appropriate than the Bible, less inviting to sarcastic criticism, and quicker in its brutal task. In my nightmares, I gasped and fought for breath under the weight of that enormous book for many nights.
All within the space of a couple of years we had two or three other tragedies, and I had the ill-luck to be too near by on each occasion. There was the slave man who was struck down with a chunk of slag for some small offence; I saw him die. And the young California emigrant who was stabbed with a bowie knife by a drunken comrade: I saw the red life gush from his breast. And the case of the rowdy young Hyde brothers and their harmless old uncle: one of them held the old man down with his knees on his breast while the other one tried repeatedly to kill him with an Allen revolver which wouldn't go off. I happened along just then, of course.
In just a couple of years, we faced two or three other tragedies, and I happened to be too close each time. There was the enslaved man who got hit with a piece of slag for some minor offense; I witnessed his death. Then there was the young California emigrant who got stabbed with a bowie knife by a drunken friend: I saw blood pour from his chest. And the incident with the troublemaking Hyde brothers and their harmless old uncle: one held the old man down with his knees on his chest while the other tried repeatedly to shoot him with a malfunctioning Allen revolver. Of course, I happened to be passing by at that moment.
Then there was the case of the young California emigrant who got drunk and proposed to raid the "Welshman's house" all alone one dark and threatening night.[11] This house stood half-way up Holliday's Hill ("Cardiff" Hill), and its sole occupants were a poor but quite respectable widow and her young and blameless daughter. The invading ruffian woke the whole village with[Pg 6] his ribald yells and coarse challenges and obscenities. I went up there with a comrade—John Briggs, I think—to look and listen. The figure of the man was dimly risible; the women were on their porch, but not visible in the deep shadow of its roof, but we heard the elder woman's voice. She had loaded an old musket with slugs, and she warned the man that if he stayed where he was while she counted ten it would cost him his life. She began to count, slowly: he began to laugh. He stopped laughing at "six"; then through the deep stillness, in a steady voice, followed the rest of the tale: "seven ... eight ... nine"—a long pause, we holding our breath—"ten!" A red spout of flame gushed out into the night, and the man dropped, with his breast riddled to rags. Then the rain and the thunder burst loose and the waiting town swarmed up the hill in the glare of the lightning like an invasion of ants. Those people saw the rest; I had had my share and was satisfied. I went home to dream, and was not disappointed.
Then there was the story of the young California emigrant who got drunk and decided to break into the "Welshman's house" all by himself one dark and stormy night.[11] This house was halfway up Holliday's Hill ("Cardiff" Hill), and the only residents were a poor but respectable widow and her innocent young daughter. The would-be intruder woke up the entire village with his loud yells and crude taunts and insults. I went up there with a friend—John Briggs, I think—to watch and listen. The man's silhouette was slightly comical; the women were on their porch, but hidden in the deep shadow of its roof, though we could hear the older woman's voice. She had loaded an old musket with slugs and warned the man that if he stayed where he was while she counted to ten, it would cost him his life. She began counting slowly: he started to laugh. He stopped laughing at "six"; then through the deep stillness, she continued in a steady voice: "seven ... eight ... nine"—a long pause as we held our breath—"ten!" A bright flash of flame burst forth into the night, and the man fell, his chest torn apart. Then the rain and thunder unleashed, and the waiting town rushed up the hill in the flash of lightning like an army of ants. Those people saw what happened next; I had seen enough and was satisfied. I went home to dream, and it was fulfilling.
My teaching and training enabled me to see deeper into these tragedies than an ignorant person could have done. I knew what they were for. I tried to disguise it from myself, but down in the secret deeps of my heart I knew—and I knew that I knew. They were inventions of Providence to beguile me to a better life. It sounds curiously innocent and conceited, now, but to me there was nothing strange about it; it was quite in accordance with the thoughtful and judicious ways of Providence as I understood them. It would not have surprised me, nor even over-flattered me, if Providence had killed off that whole community in trying to save an asset like me. Educated as I had been, it would have seemed just the thing, and well worth the expense. Why Providence should take such an anxious interest in such a property—that idea never entered my head, and there was no one in that simple hamlet who would have dreamed of putting it there. For one thing, no one was equipped with it.
My teaching and training allowed me to understand these tragedies on a deeper level than someone who was clueless. I knew their purpose. I tried to hide it from myself, but deep down in my heart, I knew—and I really knew that I knew. They were creations of Providence designed to guide me to a better life. It sounds strangely naive and arrogant now, but to me, it was completely normal; it fit perfectly with the thoughtful and careful ways of Providence as I saw them. I wouldn’t have been shocked, or even flattered, if Providence had wiped out that entire community to save someone like me. Given my education, it would have seemed entirely reasonable and worth it. Why Providence would care so much about someone like me never crossed my mind, and no one in that simple little town would have thought of it either. For one thing, no one had the understanding to think that way.
It is quite true I took all the tragedies to myself; and tallied them off, in turn as they happened, saying to myself in each case, with a sigh, "Another one gone—and on my account; this ought to bring me to repentance; His patience will not always endure." And yet privately I believed it would. That is, I believed it in the daytime; but not in the night. With the going down of the sun my faith failed, and the clammy fears gathered[Pg 7] about my heart. It was then that I repented. Those were awful nights, nights of despair, nights charged with the bitterness of death. After each tragedy I recognized the warning and repented; repented and begged; begged like a coward, begged like a dog; and not in the interest of those poor people who had been extinguished for my sake, but only in my own interest. It seems selfish, when I look back on it now.
I admit I took all the tragedies personally and counted them one by one as they happened, telling myself each time with a sigh, "Another one gone—and because of me; this should make me repent; His patience won’t last forever." And yet, deep down, I thought it would. I believed that during the day, but not at night. As the sun set, my faith crumbled, and a cold fear settled around my heart. That’s when I truly repented. Those were horrific nights, filled with despair and the bitterness of death. After each tragedy, I recognized the signs and repented; I begged; begged like a coward, begged like a dog; not for the sake of those poor souls who had suffered because of me, but purely for my own sake. It feels selfish looking back on it now.
My repentances were very real, very earnest; and after each tragedy they happened every night for a long time. But as a rule they could not stand the daylight. They faded out and shredded away and disappeared in the glad splendor of the sun. They were the creatures of fear and darkness, and they could not live out of their own place. The day gave me cheer and peace, and at night I repented again. In all my boyhood life I am not sure that I ever tried to lead a better life in the daytime—or wanted to. In my age I should never think of wishing to do such a thing. But in my age, as in my youth, night brings me many a deep remorse. I realize that from the cradle up I have been like the rest of the race—never quite sane in the night. When "Injun Joe" died.[12] ... But never mind: in another chapter I have already described what a raging hell of repentance I passed through then. I believe that for months I was as pure as the driven snow. After dark.
My regrets were very real and sincere; and after each tragedy, they happened every night for a long time. But usually, they couldn’t survive in the daylight. They faded away and vanished in the bright glory of the sun. They were born from fear and darkness, and they couldn’t exist outside of their own environment. The day brought me joy and peace, but at night, I regretted again. Throughout my childhood, I’m not sure I ever tried to lead a better life during the day—or even wanted to. At my age, I would never think of wishing to do such a thing. But just like in my youth, the night brings me a lot of deep remorse. I realize that from the cradle onward, I’ve been like everyone else—never quite sane at night. When "Injun Joe" died.[12] ... But never mind: in another chapter, I’ve already described what a raging hell of regret I went through then. I believe that for months I was as pure as the driven snow. After dark.
It was back in those far-distant days—1848 or '9—that Jim Wolf came to us. He was from Shelbyville, a hamlet thirty or forty miles back in the country, and he brought all his native sweetnesses and gentlenesses and simplicities with him. He was approaching seventeen, a grave and slender lad, trustful, honest, a creature to love and cling to. And he was incredibly bashful.
It was back in those distant days—1848 or '9—that Jim Wolf came to us. He was from Shelbyville, a small town thirty or forty miles inland, and he brought all his natural charm, kindness, and simplicity with him. He was approaching seventeen, a serious and lean young man, trusting, honest, someone to love and hold onto. And he was incredibly shy.
It is to this kind that untoward things happen. My sister gave a "candy-pull" on a winter's night. I was too young to be of the company, and Jim was too diffident. I was sent up to bed early, and Jim followed of his own motion. His room was in the new part of the house, and his window looked out on the roof of the L annex. That roof was six inches deep in snow, and the snow had an ice-crust upon it which was as slick as glass. Out of the comb of the roof projected a short chimney, a common resort for sentimental cats on moonlight nights—and this was a moonlight night. Down at the eaves, below the chimney, a canopy[Pg 8] of dead vines spread away to some posts, making a cozy shelter, and after an hour or two the rollicking crowd of young ladies and gentlemen grouped themselves in its shade, with their saucers of liquid and piping-hot candy disposed about them on the frozen ground to cool. There was joyous chaffing and joking and laughter—peal upon peal of it.
It is to this kind that unexpected things happen. My sister hosted a "candy-pull" on a winter's night. I was too young to join the group, and Jim was too shy. I was sent to bed early, and Jim followed on his own. His room was in the new part of the house, and his window overlooked the roof of the L annex. That roof was six inches deep in snow, with an ice crust on it that was as slick as glass. A short chimney jutted out from the edge of the roof, a favorite spot for sentimental cats on moonlit nights—and this was one of those nights. Down at the eaves, below the chimney, a canopy of dead vines spread out to some posts, creating a cozy shelter. After an hour or two, the lively crowd of young ladies and gentlemen gathered in its shade, with their saucers of hot candy spread out on the frozen ground to cool. There was cheerful banter, joking, and laughter—echoes upon echoes of it.
About this time a couple of old disreputable tom-cats got up on the chimney and started a heated argument about something; also about this time I gave up trying to get to sleep, and went visiting to Jim's room. He was awake and fuming about the cats and their intolerable yowling. I asked him, mockingly, why he didn't climb out and drive them away. He was nettled, and said over-boldly that for two cents he would.
Around this time, a couple of old, scruffy tomcats climbed up on the chimney and started a loud argument about something. It was also around this time that I stopped trying to sleep and went to visit Jim's room. He was awake and angry about the cats and their unbearable yowling. I jokingly asked him why he didn't just go outside and scare them off. He got annoyed and said rather boldly that for two cents he would.
It was a rash remark, and was probably repented of before it was fairly out of his mouth. But it was too late—he was committed. I knew him; and I knew he would rather break his neck than back down, if I egged him on judiciously.
It was an impulsive comment, and he probably regretted it before he even finished saying it. But it was too late—he was already in. I knew him; I knew he would rather risk everything than back down if I pushed him just right.
"Oh, of course you would! Who's doubting it?"
"Oh, of course you would! Who's questioning that?"
It galled him, and he burst out, with sharp irritation—
It annoyed him, and he exclaimed, with sharp irritation—
"Maybe you doubt it!"
"Maybe you doubt it!"
"I? Oh no, I shouldn't think of such a thing. You are always doing wonderful things. With your mouth."
"I? Oh no, I shouldn't even think about that. You're always doing amazing things. With your mouth."
He was in a passion, now. He snatched on his yarn socks and began to raise the window, saying in a voice unsteady with anger—
He was really angry now. He grabbed his yarn socks and started to open the window, saying in a voice shaky with rage—
"You think I dasn't—you do! Think what you blame please—I don't care what you think. I'll show you!"
"You think I can't—you really do! Just consider your accusations—I couldn't care less about your opinions. I'll prove it to you!"
The window made him rage; it wouldn't stay up. I said—
The window was driving him crazy; it wouldn't stay open. I said—
"Never mind, I'll hold it."
"Don't worry, I'll hold it."
Indeed, I would have done anything to help. I was only a boy, and was already in a radiant heaven of anticipation. He climbed carefully out, clung to the window-sill until his feet were safely placed, then began to pick his perilous way on all fours along the glassy comb, a foot and a hand on each side of it. I believe I enjoy it now as much as I did then: yet it is a good deal over fifty years ago. The frosty breeze flapped his short shirt about his lean legs; the crystal roof shone like polished marble in the intense glory of the moon; the unconscious cats sat erect upon the chimney, alertly watching each other, lashing their tails and pouring out their hollow grievances; and[Pg 9] slowly and cautiously Jim crept on, flapping as he went, the gay and frolicsome young creatures under the vine-canopy unaware, and outraging these solemnities with their misplaced laughter. Every time Jim slipped I had a hope; but always on he crept and disappointed it. At last he was within reaching distance. He paused, raised himself carefully up, measured his distance deliberately, then made a frantic grab at the nearest cat—and missed. Of course he lost his balance. His heels flew up, he struck on his back, and like a rocket he darted down the roof feet first, crashed through the dead vines and landed in a sitting posture in fourteen saucers of red-hot candy, in the midst of all that party—and dressed as he was: this lad who could not look a girl in the face with his clothes on. There was a wild scramble and a storm of shrieks, and Jim fled up the stairs, dripping broken crockery all the way.
Honestly, I would have done anything to help. I was just a kid, already in a bright state of excitement. He climbed out carefully, held onto the window-sill until his feet were securely on the ground, then started to make his way on all fours along the slippery edge, with a foot and a hand on each side. I think I enjoy it now as much as I did back then, even though it’s been over fifty years. The cold breeze whipped his short shirt around his skinny legs; the glassy roof glimmered like polished marble in the brilliant moonlight; the unaware cats sat upright on the chimney, closely watching each other, flicking their tails and voicing their hollow complaints; and[Pg 9] slowly and carefully, Jim crept along, flapping as he went, the playful young creatures under the vine awning oblivious, and disturbing the seriousness with their misplaced laughter. Every time Jim slipped, I felt hopeful; but he kept creeping on and dashing my hopes. Finally, he was within reach. He stopped, carefully lifted himself up, measured the distance, then made a desperate grab at the closest cat—and missed. Naturally, he lost his balance. His feet shot up, he landed on his back, and like a rocket, he slid down the roof, feet first, crashed through the dead vines, and landed sitting in fourteen bowls of hot candy, right in the middle of all that party—dressed as he was: this kid who couldn’t look a girl in the eye while fully dressed. There was a wild scramble and a cacophony of screams, and Jim ran up the stairs, leaving a trail of shattered dishes behind him.
The incident was ended. But I was not done with it yet, though I supposed I was. Eighteen or twenty years later I arrived in New York from California, and by that time I had failed in all my other undertakings and had stumbled into literature without intending it. This was early in 1867. I was offered a large sum to write something for the "Sunday Mercury," and I answered with the tale of "Jim Wolf and the Cats." I also collected the money for it—twenty-five dollars. It seemed over-pay, but I did not say anything about that, for I was not so scrupulous then as I am now.
The incident was over. But I wasn't finished with it yet, even though I thought I was. Eighteen or twenty years later, I arrived in New York from California, and by then I had failed at all my other endeavors and accidentally found my way into literature. This was early in 1867. I was offered a good amount to write something for the "Sunday Mercury," and I responded with the story of "Jim Wolf and the Cats." I also collected the payment for it—twenty-five dollars. It felt like too much, but I didn't mention it, since I wasn't as careful back then as I am now.
A year or two later "Jim Wolf and the Cats" appeared in a Tennessee paper in a new dress—as to spelling; spelling borrowed from Artemus Ward. The appropriator of the tale had a wide reputation in the West, and was exceedingly popular. Deservedly so, I think. He wrote some of the breeziest and funniest things I have ever read, and did his work with distinguished ease and fluency. His name has passed out of my memory.
A year or two later, "Jim Wolf and the Cats" showed up in a Tennessee newspaper with a fresh take on the spelling, inspired by Artemus Ward. The person who adapted the story was well-known in the West and was really popular. Rightfully so, in my opinion. He wrote some of the most lively and hilarious stuff I've ever read, and he did it all with remarkable ease and style. I can’t remember his name now.
A couple of years went by; then the original story—my own version—cropped up again and went floating around in the spelling, and with my name to it. Soon first one paper and then another fell upon me rigorously for "stealing" Jim Wolf and the Cats from the Tennessee man. I got a merciless beating, but I did not mind it. It's all in the game. Besides, I had learned, a good while before that, that it is not wise to keep the fire going under a slander unless you can get some large[Pg 10] advantage out of keeping it alive. Few slanders can stand the wear of silence.
A couple of years passed, and then my original story—my own version—came up again and circulated with my name attached. Soon, one newspaper after another accused me harshly of "stealing" Jim Wolf and the Cats from the Tennessee guy. I took a harsh hit, but I didn't care. It's part of the game. Plus, I had learned quite a while back that it’s not smart to keep the spotlight on a rumor unless you can gain something big from keeping it going. Most rumors can’t withstand the test of silence.
But I was not done with Jim and the Cats yet. In 1873 I was lecturing in London, in the Queen's Concert Rooms, Hanover Square, and was living at the Langham Hotel, Portland place. I had no domestic household, and no official household except George Dolby, lecture-agent, and Charles Warren Stoddard, the California poet, now (1900) Professor of English Literature in the Roman Catholic University, Washington. Ostensibly Stoddard was my private secretary; in reality he was merely my comrade—I hired him in order to have his company. As secretary there was nothing for him to do except to scrap-book the daily reports of the great trial of the Tichborne Claimant for perjury. But he made a sufficient job out of that, for the reports filled six columns a day and he usually postponed the scrap-booking until Sunday; then he had 36 columns to cut out and paste in—a proper labor for Hercules. He did his work well, but if he had been older and feebler it would have killed him once a week. Without doubt he does his literary lectures well, but also without doubt he prepares them fifteen minutes before he is due on his platform and thus gets into them a freshness and sparkle which they might lack if they underwent the staling process of overstudy.
But I wasn’t finished with Jim and the Cats yet. In 1873, I was giving lectures in London, at the Queen's Concert Rooms, Hanover Square, and was staying at the Langham Hotel on Portland Place. I had no domestic staff and no official team except for George Dolby, my lecture agent, and Charles Warren Stoddard, the California poet, who is now (1900) a Professor of English Literature at the Roman Catholic University in Washington. Officially, Stoddard was my private secretary; in reality, he was just my friend—I hired him to have someone to hang out with. As my secretary, he had nothing much to do except compile daily reports of the big trial of the Tichborne Claimant for perjury. But he made a good job of it, as the reports filled six columns a day, and he usually left the scrapbooking for Sunday; then he had to cut out and paste in 36 columns—a real Herculean task. He did his job well, but if he had been older and weaker, it would have been too much for him each week. Without a doubt, he gives his literary lectures well, but also without question, he prepares them just fifteen minutes before he’s due on stage, which gives them a freshness and sparkle they might lack if he overstudied them.
He was good company when he was awake. He was refined, sensitive, charming, gentle, generous, honest himself and unsuspicious of other people's honesty, and I think he was the purest male I have known, in mind and speech. George Dolby was something of a contrast to him, but the two were very friendly and sociable together, nevertheless. Dolby was large and ruddy, full of life and strength and spirits, a tireless and energetic talker, and always overflowing with good-nature and bursting with jollity. It was a choice and satisfactory menagerie, this pensive poet and this gladsome gorilla. An indelicate story was a sharp distress to Stoddard; Dolby told him twenty-five a day. Dolby always came home with us after the lecture, and entertained Stoddard till midnight. Me too. After he left, I walked the floor and talked, and Stoddard went to sleep on the sofa. I hired him for company.
He was great to be around when he was awake. He was refined, sensitive, charming, gentle, generous, honest, and trusting of others' honesty. I think he was the purest guy I've known, both in thoughts and words. George Dolby was quite different from him, but the two got along very well anyway. Dolby was big and hearty, full of life and energy, a nonstop talker, and always cheerful and overflowing with good vibes. It was quite a mix, this thoughtful poet and this joyful character. A crude story really upset Stoddard, while Dolby shared about twenty-five of them daily. Dolby would always come home with us after the lecture and keep Stoddard entertained until midnight. Me too. After he left, I would pace around and talk while Stoddard fell asleep on the sofa. I brought him along for company.
Dolby had been agent for concerts, and theatres, and Charles Dickens and all sorts of shows and "attractions" for many years;[Pg 11] he had known the human being in many aspects, and he didn't much believe in him. But the poet did. The waifs and estrays found a friend in Stoddard: Dolby tried to persuade him that he was dispensing his charities unworthily, but he was never able to succeed.
Dolby had been an agent for concerts, theaters, Charles Dickens, and all kinds of shows and "attractions" for many years;[Pg 11] he had seen humanity in many ways, and he didn't have much faith in it. But the poet did. The lost and abandoned found a friend in Stoddard: Dolby tried to convince him that he was giving his charity to unworthy people, but he never managed to succeed.
One night a young American got access to Stoddard at the Concert Rooms and told him a moving tale. He said he was living on the Surrey side, and for some strange reason his remittances had failed to arrive from home; he had no money, he was out of employment, and friendless; his girl-wife and his new baby were actually suffering for food; for the love of heaven could he lend him a sovereign until his remittances should resume? Stoddard was deeply touched, and gave him a sovereign on my account. Dolby scoffed, but Stoddard stood his ground. Each told me his story later in the evening, and I backed Stoddard's judgment. Dolby said we were women in disguise, and not a sane kind of women, either.
One night, a young American managed to meet Stoddard at the Concert Rooms and shared a heartbreaking story. He said he lived on the Surrey side, and for some inexplicable reason, his money transfers had not arrived from home; he had no cash, was unemployed, and felt completely alone. His young wife and their new baby were actually going hungry. For the love of God, could Stoddard lend him a sovereign until the money started coming in again? Stoddard was really moved and gave him a sovereign on my behalf. Dolby scoffed, but Stoddard held his ground. Later that evening, each of them told me their version of the story, and I supported Stoddard's decision. Dolby commented that we were acting like a couple of crazy women.
The next week the young man came again. His wife was ill with the pleurisy, the baby had the bots, or something, I am not sure of the name of the disease; the doctor and the drugs had eaten up the money, the poor little family was starving. If Stoddard "in the kindness of his heart could only spare him another sovereign," etc., etc. Stoddard was much moved, and spared him a sovereign for me. Dolby was outraged. He spoke up and said to the customer—
The following week, the young man returned. His wife was sick with pleurisy, and the baby had some kind of intestinal issue; I’m not sure what it was called. The doctor and medications had drained their money, and the poor little family was starving. If Stoddard could "in the kindness of his heart spare him another pound," etc., etc. Stoddard was really touched and gave him a pound for me. Dolby was furious. He spoke up and said to the customer—
"Now, young man, you are going to the hotel with us and state your case to the other member of the family. If you don't make him believe in you I sha'n't honor this poet's drafts in your interest any longer, for I don't believe in you myself."
"Now, young man, you’re coming to the hotel with us to present your case to the other family member. If you can’t make him believe in you, I won’t support this poet's expenses on your behalf anymore, because I don’t believe in you either."
The young man was quite willing. I found no fault in him. On the contrary, I believed in him at once, and was solicitous to heal the wounds inflicted by Dolby's too frank incredulity; therefore I did everything I could think of to cheer him up and entertain him and make him feel at home and comfortable. I spun many yarns; among others the tale of Jim Wolf and the Cats. Learning that he had done something in a small way in literature, I offered to try to find a market for him in that line. His face lighted joyfully at that, and he said that if I could only sell a small manuscript to Tom Hood's Annual for him it would be the happiest event of his sad life and he would hold me[Pg 12] in grateful remembrance always. That was a most pleasant night for three of us, but Dolby was disgusted and sarcastic.
The young man was very eager. I found no faults in him. On the contrary, I believed in him right away, and I was eager to heal the wounds caused by Dolby's harsh disbelief; so I did everything I could think of to lift his spirits, entertain him, and make him feel at home and comfortable. I told many stories, including the one about Jim Wolf and the Cats. After learning that he had done a bit of writing, I offered to help him find a publisher for his work. His face lit up with joy at that, and he said that if I could get a small manuscript published in Tom Hood's Annual for him, it would be the happiest moment of his sad life, and he would always remember me with gratitude. That was a really nice night for the three of us, but Dolby was annoyed and sarcastic.
Next week the baby died. Meantime I had spoken to Tom Hood and gained his sympathy. The young man had sent his manuscript to him, and the very day the child died the money for the MS. came—three guineas. The young man came with a poor little strip of crape around his arm and thanked me, and said that nothing could have been more timely than that money, and that his poor little wife was grateful beyond words for the service I had rendered. He wept, and in fact Stoddard and I wept with him, which was but natural. Also Dolby wept. At least he wiped his eyes and wrung out his handkerchief, and sobbed stertorously and made other exaggerated shows of grief. Stoddard and I were ashamed of Dolby, and tried to make the young man understand that he meant no harm, it was only his way. The young man said sadly that he was not minding it, his grief was too deep for other hurts; that he was only thinking of the funeral, and the heavy expenses which—
Next week, the baby died. In the meantime, I had talked to Tom Hood and earned his sympathy. The young man had sent his manuscript to him, and on the very day the child died, the payment for the manuscript arrived—three guineas. The young man came with a sad little strip of black fabric around his arm and thanked me, saying that nothing could have come at a better time than that money, and that his poor little wife was more grateful than words could express for the help I had given. He cried, and Stoddard and I cried with him, which was only natural. Dolby also cried. Well, at least he wiped his eyes, soaked his handkerchief, and sobbed loudly, putting on other exaggerated displays of grief. Stoddard and I felt embarrassed by Dolby and tried to help the young man understand that he meant no harm; it was just his way. The young man said sadly that he wasn’t paying attention to it; his grief was too deep for anything else to matter; he was only thinking about the funeral and the heavy expenses which—
We cut that short and told him not to trouble about it, leave it all to us; send the bills to Mr. Dolby and—
We ended that conversation quickly and told him not to worry about it, to leave everything to us; send the bills to Mr. Dolby and—
"Yes," said Dolby, with a mock tremor in his voice, "send them to me, and I will pay them. What, are you going? You must not go alone in your worn and broken condition; Mr. Stoddard and I will go with you. Come, Stoddard. We will comfort the bereaved mamma and get a lock of the baby's hair."
"Yes," Dolby said, pretending to tremble in his voice, "send them to me, and I'll handle the payment. What, are you leaving? You shouldn't go alone in your worn-out state; Mr. Stoddard and I will join you. Come on, Stoddard. We'll console the grieving mom and get a lock of the baby's hair."
It was shocking. We were ashamed of him again, and said so. But he was not disturbed. He said—
It was shocking. We were ashamed of him again, and we voiced it. But he was unfazed. He said—
"Oh, I know this kind, the woods are full of them. I'll make this offer: if he will show me his family I will give him twenty pounds. Come!" The young man said he would not remain to be insulted; and he said good-night and took his hat. But Dolby said he would go with him, and stay by him until he found the family. Stoddard went along to soothe the young man and modify Dolby. They drove across the river and all over Southwark, but did not find the family. At last the young man confessed there wasn't any.
"Oh, I know this type; the woods are full of them. Here’s my offer: if he shows me his family, I’ll give him twenty pounds. Come on!” The young man said he wouldn’t stick around to be insulted; he wished them goodnight and grabbed his hat. But Dolby insisted he would go with him and stay by his side until they found the family. Stoddard joined them to calm the young man and temper Dolby. They drove across the river and all over Southwark, but couldn’t find the family. Finally, the young man admitted there wasn’t one.
The thing he sold to Tom Hood's Annual was "Jim and the Cats." And he did not put my name to it.
The thing he sold to Tom Hood's Annual was "Jim and the Cats." And he didn't put my name on it.
So that small tale was sold three times. I am selling it again, now. It is one of the best properties I have come across.
So that little story was sold three times. I'm selling it again now. It's one of the best assets I've found.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
FOOTNOTES:
[9] The colored butler.
The diverse butler.
[10] See "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn."
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn."
[12] Used in "Tom Sawyer."
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Featured in "Tom Sawyer."
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXV.
MAY 17, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XVIII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated December 21, 1906.] I wish to insert here some pages of Susy's Biography of me in which the biographer does not scatter, according to her custom, but sticks pretty steadily to a single subject until she has fought it to a finish:
[Dictated December 21, 1906.] I want to include some pages from Susy's biography about me where the biographer doesn't go off on tangents, as she usually does, but instead stays focused on one topic until she has thoroughly explored it:
Feb. 27, '86.—Last summer while we were in Elmira an article came out in the "Christian Union" by name "What ought he to have done" treating of the government of children, or rather giving an account of a fathers battle with his little baby boy, by the mother of the child and put in the form of a question as to whether the father disciplined the child corectly or not, different people wrote their opinions of the fathers behavior, and told what they thought he should have done. Mamma had long known how to disciplin children, for in fact the bringing up of children had been one of her specialties for many years.[Pg 114] She had a great many theories, but one of them was, that if a child was big enough to be nauty, it was big enough to be whipped and here we all agreed with her. I remember one morning when Dr. —— came up to the farm he had a long discussion with mamma, upon the following topic. Mamma gave this as illustrative of one important rule for punishing a child. She said we will suppose the boy has thrown a handkerchief onto the floor, I tell him to pick it up, he refuses. I tell him again, he refuses. Then I say you must either pick up the handkerchief or have a whipping. My theory is never to make a child have a whipping and pick up the handkerchief too. I say "If you do not pick it up, I must punish you," if he doesn't he gets the whipping, but I pick up the handkerchief, if he does he gets no punishment. I tell him to do a thing if he disobeys me he is punished for so doing, but not forced to obey me afterwards.
Feb. 27, '86.—Last summer while we were in Elmira, an article appeared in the "Christian Union" called "What Ought He to Have Done," which discussed child discipline. It outlined a father’s struggle with his young son, as presented by the boy’s mother, and raised questions about whether the father's disciplinary methods were appropriate. Various people expressed their opinions on the father's actions and suggested alternatives. Mom had always known how to discipline children since raising kids had been one of her specialties for many years.[Pg 114] She had many theories, one of which was that if a child was old enough to be naughty, they were old enough to be spanked, and we all agreed with her on that. I remember one morning when Dr. —— visited the farm and had a long conversation with Mom about this topic. Mom used this as an example of an important rule for punishing a child. She said, let’s say the boy throws a handkerchief on the floor. I tell him to pick it up, but he refuses. I tell him again, and he still refuses. Then I say he must either pick up the handkerchief or get a spanking. My theory is to never make a child get a spanking and pick up the handkerchief at the same time. I say, "If you don't pick it up, I have to punish you." If he doesn’t, he gets the spanking, but I will pick up the handkerchief. If he does pick it up, he doesn’t get punished. I ask him to do something, and if he disobeys me, he is punished for that but not forced to obey me afterward.
When Clara and I had been very nauty or were being very nauty, the nurse would go and call Mamma and she would appear suddenly and look at us (she had a way of looking at us when she was displeased as if she could see right through us) till we were ready to sink through the floor from embarasment, and total absence of knowing what to say. This look was usually followed with "Clara" or "Susy what do you mean by this? do you want to come to the bath-room with me?" Then followed the climax for Clara and I both new only too well what going to the bath-room meant.
When Clara and I were really naughty, the nurse would call Mom, and she would suddenly appear and look at us (she had a way of looking at us when she was upset that made it feel like she could see right through us) until we felt like we could just sink through the floor from embarrassment and not knowing what to say. This look was usually followed by, "Clara" or "Susy, what do you mean by this? Do you want to come to the bathroom with me?" Then came the moment we both knew all too well what going to the bathroom meant.
But mamma's first and foremost object was to make the child understand that he is being punished for his sake, and because the mother so loves him that she cannot allow him to do wrong; also that it is as hard for her to punish him as for him to be punished and even harder. Mamma never allowed herself to punish us when she was angry with us she never struck us because she was enoyed at us and felt like striking us if we had been nauty and had enoyed her, so that she thought she felt or would show the least bit of temper toward us while punnishing us, she always postponed the punishment until she was no more chafed by our behavior. She never humored herself by striking or punishing us because or while she was the least bit enoyed with us.
But Mom's main goal was to help the child understand that he's being punished for his benefit and because she loves him so much that she can't let him do wrong. She also wanted him to know that punishing him is just as hard for her, if not harder. Mom never punished us when she was angry. She never hit us out of frustration or because we had misbehaved and upset her. If she felt any anger while punishing us, she always waited until she was no longer irritated by our actions. She never let her emotions drive her to hit or punish us while she was even a little upset.
Our very worst nautinesses were punished by being taken to the bath-room and being whipped by the paper cutter. But after the whipping was over, mamma did not allow us to leave her until we were perfectly happy, and perfectly understood why we had been whipped. I never remember having felt the least bit bitterly toward mamma for punishing me. I always felt I had deserved my punishment, and was much happier for having received it. For after mamma had punished us and shown her displeasure, she showed no signs of further displeasure, but acted as if we had not displeased her in any way.
Our worst misbehaviors were punished by being taken to the bathroom and whipped with the paper cutter. But once the punishment was over, Mom wouldn’t let us leave until we were completely happy and fully understood why we had been punished. I never remembered feeling the slightest bit bitter toward Mom for punishing me. I always felt I deserved the punishment and was much happier for having received it. After Mom had punished us and expressed her disapproval, she didn’t show any further displeasure but acted as if we hadn’t upset her at all.
Ordinary punishments answered very well for Susy. She was a thinker, and would reason out the purpose of them, apply the lesson, and achieve the reform required. But it was much less easy to devise punishments that would reform Clara. This was[Pg 115] because she was a philosopher who was always turning her attention to finding something good and satisfactory and entertaining in everything that came her way; consequently it was sometimes pretty discouraging to the troubled mother to find that after all her pains and thought in inventing what she meant to be a severe and reform-compelling punishment, the child had entirely missed the severities through her native disposition to get interest and pleasure out of them as novelties. The mother, in her anxiety to find a penalty that would take sharp hold and do its work effectively, at last resorted, with a sore heart, and with a reproachful conscience, to that punishment which the incorrigible criminal in the penitentiary dreads above all the other punitive miseries which the warden inflicts upon him for his good—solitary confinement in the dark chamber. The grieved and worried mother shut Clara up in a very small clothes-closet and went away and left her there—for fifteen minutes—it was all that the mother-heart could endure. Then she came softly back and listened—listened for the sobs, but there weren't any; there were muffled and inarticulate sounds, but they could not be construed into sobs. The mother waited half an hour longer; by that time she was suffering so intensely with sorrow and compassion for the little prisoner that she was not able to wait any longer for the distressed sounds which she had counted upon to inform her when there had been punishment enough and the reform accomplished. She opened the closet to set the prisoner free and take her back into her loving favor and forgiveness, but the result was not the one expected. The captive had manufactured a fairy cavern out of the closet, and friendly fairies out of the clothes hanging from the hooks, and was having a most sinful and unrepentant good time, and requested permission to spend the rest of the day there!
Ordinary punishments worked well for Susy. She was a thinker who would figure out the purpose behind them, learn the lesson, and make the needed changes. But it was much harder to come up with punishments that would reform Clara. This was[Pg 115] because she was a philosopher, always trying to find something good, satisfying, and entertaining in everything she encountered. As a result, it was often pretty discouraging for the worried mother to see that, despite all her efforts to create what she hoped would be a tough and effective punishment, Clara completely missed the seriousness of it and instead found interest and fun in the situation as if it were a novelty. In her anxiety to find a punishment that would grab attention and get results, the mother reluctantly turned to the one that the most hardened criminal in prison fears above all other disciplinary measures—the solitary confinement in a dark room. The distressed mother locked Clara in a tiny closet and left her there—for fifteen minutes—it was all she could bear. Then she quietly returned and listened for sobs, but there were none; just muffled sounds that weren’t quite sobs. After waiting another half hour, her sorrow and compassion for the little prisoner became so overwhelming that she couldn’t wait any longer for the crying she had expected to signal when the punishment was sufficient and the reform achieved. She opened the closet to free the prisoner and welcome her back into her loving embrace and forgiveness, but the outcome was not what she anticipated. The little captive had turned the closet into a fairy cave, creating friendly fairies out of the clothes hanging from the hooks and was having a wonderfully sinful and unrepentant good time, asking for permission to spend the rest of the day there!
From Susy's Biography of Me.
From Susy's Bio of Me.
But Mamma's oppinions and ideas upon the subject of bringing up children has always been more or less of a joke in our family, perticularly since Papa's article in the "Christian Union," and I am sure Clara and I have related the history of our old family paper-cutter, our punishments and privations with rather more pride and triumph than any other sentiment, because of Mamma's way of rearing us.
Mom's views on parenting have always been a bit of a joke in our family, especially after Dad's article in the "Christian Union." Clara and I often tell the story of our old family paper cutter, our punishments and struggles with more pride and triumph than anything else because of how Mom raised us.
When the article "What ought he to have done?" came out Mamma read it, and was very much interested in it. And when papa heard that she had read it he went to work and secretly wrote his opinion[Pg 116] of what the father ought to have done. He told Aunt Susy, Clara and I, about it but mamma was not to see it or hear any thing about it till it came out. He gave it to Aunt Susy to read, and after Clara and I had gone up to get ready for bed he brought it up for us to read. He told what he thought the father ought to have done by telling what mamma would have done. The article was a beautiful tribute to mamma and every word in it true. But still in writing about mamma he partly forgot that the article was going to be published, I think, and expressed himself more fully than he would do the second time he wrote it; I think the article has done and will do a great deal of good, and I think it would have been perfect for the family and friend's enjoyment, but a little bit too private to have been published as it was. And Papa felt so too, because the very next day or a few days after, he went down to New York to see if he couldn't get it back before it was published but it was too late, and he had to return without it. When the Christian Union reached the farm and papa's article in it all ready and waiting to be read to mamma papa hadn't the courage to show it to her (for he knew she wouldn't like it at all) at first, and he didn't but he might have let it go and never let her see it, but finally he gave his consent to her seeing it, and told Clara and I we could take it to her, which we did, with tardiness, and we all stood around mamma while she read it, all wondering what she would say and think about it.
When the article "What Should He Have Done?" came out, Mom found it really interesting. After hearing she read it, Dad secretly started working on his own take on what the father should have done. He told Aunt Susy, Clara, and me about it, but Mom wasn’t supposed to see or hear anything until it was published. He had Aunt Susy read it, and once Clara and I went upstairs to get ready for bed, he brought it up for us to read. He explained what he thought the father should have done by sharing what Mom would have done. The article was a lovely tribute to Mom, and every word was true. But while writing about her, I think he forgot it was going to be published and expressed himself more openly than he might have in a second draft. I believe the article has done and will do a lot of good, and it would have been great for family and friends to enjoy, but maybe it was a little too personal for publication in that form. Dad felt the same way because a day or two later, he went down to New York to see if he could get it back before it was published, but it was too late, and he returned without it. When the Christian Union arrived at the farm with Dad's article ready to read to Mom, he hesitated at first, knowing she wouldn’t like it at all. Eventually, he decided she should see it and told Clara and me we could take it to her, which we did, even though it was a bit late. We all gathered around Mom while she read it, wondering what she would say and think.
She was too much surprised, (and pleased privately, too) to say much at first, but as we all expected publicly, (or rather when she remembered that this article was to be read by every one that took the Christian Union) she was rather shocked and a little displeased.
She was too surprised (and secretly pleased too) to say much at first, but as we expected, when she realized everyone who subscribed to the Christian Union would read it, she was quite shocked and a bit unhappy.
Clara and I had great fun the night papa gave it to us to read and then hide, so mamma couldn't see it, for just as we were in the midst of reading it mamma appeared, papa following anxiously and asked why we were not in bed? then a scuffle ensued for we told her it was a secret and tried to hide it; but she chased us wherever we went, till she thought it was time for us to go to bed, then she surendered and left us to tuck it under Clara's matress.
Clara and I had a great time the night Dad gave us the book to read and then hide from Mom. Just as we were getting into it, Mom showed up, with Dad nervously trailing behind, asking why we weren’t in bed. A scuffle broke out because we told her it was a secret and tried to hide the book. She chased us around until she decided it was time for us to go to bed. In the end, she gave up and left us to tuck it under Clara's mattress.
A little while after the article was published letters began to come in to papa crittisizing it, there were some very pleasant ones but a few very disagreable. One of these, the very worst, mamma got hold of and read, to papa's great regret, it was full of the most disagreble things, and so very enoying to papa that he for a time felt he must do something to show the author of it his great displeasure at being so insulted. But he finally decided not to, because he felt the man had some cause for feeling enoyed at, for papa had spoken of him, (he was the baby's father) rather slightingly in his Christian Union Article.
A little while after the article was published, Dad started receiving letters criticizing it. Some were really nice, but a few were quite nasty. One of the worst was read by Mom, much to Dad's dismay. It was filled with harsh comments, and it upset Dad so much he briefly thought about doing something to show the author how offended he was. But in the end, he decided against it because he realized the guy had a reason to be upset, since Dad had spoken about him—who was the baby's father—rather dismissively in his Christian Union article.
After all this, papa and mamma both wished I think they might never hear or be spoken to on the subject of the Christian Union article, and whenever any has spoken to me and told me "How much they did enjoy my father's article in the Christian Union" I almost laughed in[Pg 117] their faces when I remembered what a great variety of oppinions had been expressed upon the subject of the Christian Union article of papa's.
After all this, both Dad and Mom wished they would never hear or be talked to about the Christian Union article again. Whenever someone mentions it to me, saying, "How much they enjoyed my father's article in the Christian Union," I almost laugh in[Pg 117] their faces when I remember the wide range of opinions that had been shared about it.
The article was written in July or August and just the other day papa received quite a bright letter from a gentleman who has read the C. U. article and gave his opinion of it in these words.
The article was written in July or August, and just the other day, Dad received a rather glowing letter from a gentleman who read the C. U. article and shared his thoughts on it in these words.
It is missing. She probably put the letter between the leaves of the Biography and it got lost out. She threw away the hostile letters, but tried to keep the pleasantest one for her book; surely there has been no kindlier biographer than this one. Yet to a quite creditable degree she is loyal to the responsibilities of her position as historian—not eulogist—and honorably gives me a quiet prod now and then. But how many, many, many she has withheld that I deserved! I could prize them now; there would be no acid in her words, and it is loss to me that she did not set them all down. Oh, Susy, you sweet little biographer, you break my old heart with your gentle charities!
It's missing. She probably placed the letter between the pages of the Biography and it got lost. She tossed out the negative letters but tried to hold onto the nice one for her book; surely no biographer has been kinder than this one. Yet, to a commendable extent, she stays true to her duties as a historian—not as an eulogist—and gives me a subtle nudge every now and then. But how many, many, many she has kept back that I deserved! I would cherish them now; there would be no bite in her words, and it's a loss for me that she didn’t write them all down. Oh, Susy, you sweet little biographer, you break my old heart with your gentle kindness!
I think a great deal of her work. Her canvases are on their easels, and her brush flies about in a care-free and random way, delivering a dash here, a dash there and another yonder, and one might suppose that there would be no definite result; on the contrary I think that an intelligent reader of her little book must find that by the time he has finished it he has somehow accumulated a pretty clear and nicely shaded idea of the several members of this family—including Susy herself—and that the random dashes on the canvases have developed into portraits. I feel that my own portrait, with some of the defects fined down and others left out, is here; and I am sure that any who knew the mother will recognize her without difficulty, and will say that the lines are drawn with a just judgment and a sure hand. Little creature though Susy was, the penetration which was born in her finds its way to the surface more than once in these pages.
I really admire her work. Her canvases are set up on their easels, and her brush moves around freely and randomly, adding a splash here, a splash there, and another over there. One might think it wouldn't lead to a clear outcome; however, I believe that anyone who thoughtfully reads her little book will find that by the time they finish, they've gathered a pretty clear and well-defined understanding of the various members of this family—including Susy herself—and that the random strokes on the canvases have transformed into portraits. I feel that my own portrait, with some flaws smoothed out and others omitted, is here, and I’m sure anyone who knew the mother will easily recognize her and will say that the lines are drawn with good judgment and skill. Although Susy was a small creature, her inherent insight shines through more than once in these pages.
Before Susy began the Biography she let fall a remark now and then concerning my character which showed that she had it under observation. In the Record which we kept of the children's sayings there is an instance of this. She was twelve years old at the time. We had established a rule that each member of the family must bring a fact to breakfast—a fact drawn from a book or from any other source; any fact would answer. Susy's first contribution was in substance as follows. Two great exiles[Pg 118] and former opponents in war met in Ephesus—Scipio and Hannibal. Scipio asked Hannibal to name the greatest general the world had produced.
Before Susy started the Biography, she occasionally made comments about my character, showing that she was paying attention. In the Record we kept of the kids' quotes, there's an example of this. She was twelve years old at the time. We had a rule that each family member had to bring a fact to breakfast—anything from a book or another source would do. Susy’s first contribution went something like this: Two great exiles[Pg 118] and former enemies in war met in Ephesus—Scipio and Hannibal. Scipio asked Hannibal to name the greatest general the world had ever seen.
"Alexander"—and he explained why.
"Alexander" — and he shared why.
"And the next greatest?"
"And what's the next best?"
"Pyrrhus"—and he explained why.
"Pyrrhus"—and he explained why?
"But where do you place yourself, then?"
"But where do you see yourself, then?"
"If I had conquered you I would place myself before the others."
"If I had defeated you, I would put myself ahead of everyone else."
Susy's grave comment was—
Susy's harsh comment was—
"That attracted me, it was just like papa—he is so frank about his books."
"That caught my attention, it was just like dad—he's so open about his books."
So frank in admiring them, she meant.
So honest in admiring them, she meant.
[Thursday, March 28, 1907.] Some months ago I commented upon a chapter of Susy's Biography wherein she very elaborately discussed an article about the training and disciplining of children, which I had published in the "Christian Union" (this was twenty-one years ago), an article which was full of worshipful praises of Mrs. Clemens as a mother, and which little Clara, and Susy, and I had been hiding from this lovely and admirable mother because we knew she would disapprove of public and printed praises of herself. At the time that I was dictating these comments, several months ago, I was trying to call back to my memory some of the details of that article, but I was not able to do it, and I wished I had a copy of the article so that I could see what there was about it which gave it such large interest for Susy.
[Thursday, March 28, 1907.] A few months ago, I talked about a chapter from Susy's Biography where she went into detail about an article I wrote on the training and disciplining of children, published in the "Christian Union" (that was twenty-one years ago). The article was filled with glowing praises for Mrs. Clemens as a mother, and Clara, Susy, and I had been keeping it from our wonderful and admirable mother because we knew she wouldn't approve of public recognition of her. When I was making those comments a few months back, I was trying to remember some details from that article, but I couldn't. I really wished I had a copy to see what made it so interesting to Susy.
Yesterday afternoon I elected to walk home from the luncheon at the St. Regis, which is in 56th Street and Fifth Avenue, for it was a fine spring day and I hadn't had a walk for a year or two, and felt the need of exercise. As I walked along down Fifth Avenue the desire to see that "Christian Union" article came into my head again. I had just reached the corner of 42nd Street then, and there was the usual jam of wagons, carriages, and automobiles there. I stopped to let it thin out before trying to cross the street, but a stranger, who didn't require as much room as I do, came racing by and darted into a crack among the vehicles and made the crossing. But on his way past me he thrust a couple of ancient newspaper clippings into my hand, and said,[Pg 119]
Yesterday afternoon, I decided to walk home from lunch at the St. Regis, located at 56th Street and Fifth Avenue, because it was a beautiful spring day and I hadn't taken a walk in a year or two, feeling like I needed some exercise. As I walked down Fifth Avenue, I again thought about that "Christian Union" article. I had just reached the corner of 42nd Street, where the usual crowd of wagons, carriages, and cars was stuck. I stopped to let it clear before trying to cross the street, but a stranger, who didn’t need as much space as I did, zipped past and slipped through a gap in the vehicles to make it across. As he hurried by, he shoved a couple of old newspaper clippings into my hand and said, [Pg 119]
"There, you don't know me, but I have saved them in my scrap-book for twenty years, and it occurred to me this morning that perhaps you would like to see them, so I was carrying them down-town to mail them, I not expecting to run across you in this accidental way, of course; but I will give them into your own hands now. Good-by!"—and he disappeared among the wagons.
"There, you may not know me, but I’ve kept them in my scrapbook for twenty years. It crossed my mind this morning that you might want to see them, so I was on my way downtown to mail them, not expecting to run into you like this, of course; but I’ll hand them over to you now. Goodbye!"—and he vanished among the wagons.
Those scraps which he had put into my hand were ancient newspaper copies of that "Christian Union" article! It is a handsome instance of mental telegraphy—or if it isn't that, it is a handsome case of coincidence.
Those scraps he handed to me were old newspaper copies of that "Christian Union" article! It's a great example of mental telepathy—or if it’s not that, it's a remarkable case of coincidence.
From the Biography.
From the Bio.
March 14th, '86.—Mr. Laurence Barrette and Mr. and Mrs. Hutton were here a little while ago, and we had a very interesting visit from them. Papa said Mr. Barette never had acted so well before when he had seen him, as he did the first night he was staying with us. And Mrs. —— said she never had seen an actor on the stage, whom she more wanted to speak with.
March 14th, '86.—Mr. Laurence Barrette and Mr. and Mrs. Hutton visited us a little while ago, and we had a really interesting time with them. Dad said Mr. Barrette had never performed as well as he did the first night he stayed with us. And Mrs. —— mentioned that she had never seen an actor on stage that she wanted to talk to more.
Papa has been very much interested of late, in the "Mind Cure" theory. And in fact so have we all. A young lady in town has worked wonders by using the "Mind Cure" upon people; she is constantly busy now curing peoples deseases in this way—and curing her own even, which to me seems the most remarkable of all.
Dad has really been into the "Mind Cure" theory lately. In fact, all of us have. A young woman in town has done amazing things by using the "Mind Cure" to help others; she's always busy healing people this way—and even addressing her own issues, which I find really impressive.
A little while past, papa was delighted with the knowledge of what he thought the best way of curing a cold, which was by starving it. This starving did work beautifully, and freed him from a great many severe colds. Now he says it wasn't the starving that helped his colds, but the trust in the starving, the mind cure connected with the starving.
Not long ago, Dad was really excited about what he thought was the best way to cure a cold, which was by fasting. This method worked surprisingly well and helped him recover from many bad colds. Now he claims it wasn't the fasting that actually helped his colds, but the belief in fasting, the mental attitude associated with it.
I shouldn't wonder if we finally became firm believers in Mind Cure. The next time papa has a cold, I haven't a doubt, he will send for Miss H—— the young lady who is doctoring in the "Mind Cure" theory, to cure him of it.
I wouldn’t be surprised if we all became strong believers in Mind Cure. The next time Dad catches a cold, I have no doubt he’ll call Miss H——, the young woman practicing the "Mind Cure" method, to help him get through it.
Mamma was over at Mrs. George Warners to lunch the other day, and Miss H—— was there too. Mamma asked if anything as natural as near sightedness could be cured she said oh yes just as well as other deseases.
Mom was at Mrs. George Warner's for lunch the other day, and Miss H—— was there too. Mom asked if something as common as nearsightedness could be cured, and she replied, oh yes, just as easily as other diseases.
When mamma came home, she took me into her room, and told me that perhaps my near-sightedness could be cured by the "Mind Cure" and that she was going to have me try the treatment any way, there could be no harm in it, and there might be great good. If her plan succeeds there certainly will be a great deal in "Mind Cure" to my oppinion, for I am very near sighted and so is mamma, and I never expected there could be any more cure for it than for blindness, but now I dont know but what theres a cure for that.
When Mom came home, she took me into her room and told me that maybe my nearsightedness could be treated with the "Mind Cure" and that she was going to have me try the treatment anyway. There couldn’t be any harm in it, and it might do a lot of good. If her plan works, I think the "Mind Cure" will definitely have merit, especially since I am very nearsighted, and so is Mom. I never thought there could be any kind of cure for it other than for blindness, but now I’m starting to think there might be a cure for that.
It was a disappointment; her near-sightedness remained with[Pg 120] her to the end. She was born with it, no doubt; yet, strangely enough, she must have been four years old, and possibly five, before we knew of its existence. It is not easy to understand how that could have happened. I discovered the defect by accident. I was half-way up the hall stairs one day at home, and was leading her by the hand, when I glanced back through the open door of the dining-room and saw what I thought she would recognise as a pretty picture. It was "Stray Kit," the slender, the graceful, the sociable, the beautiful, the incomparable, the cat of cats, the tortoise-shell, curled up as round as a wheel and sound asleep on the fire-red cover of the dining-table, with a brilliant stream of sunlight falling across her. I exclaimed about it, but Susy said she could see nothing there, neither cat nor table-cloth. The distance was so slight—not more than twenty feet, perhaps—that if it had been any other child I should not have credited the statement.
It was disappointing; her nearsightedness stayed with[Pg 120] her until the end. She was born with it, for sure; yet, strangely enough, it wasn’t until she was about four or maybe five years old that we realized it existed. It’s hard to understand how that could happen. I found out about the issue by accident. One day, I was halfway up the stairs at home, holding her hand, when I turned back through the open dining-room door and saw what I thought she would recognize as a pretty picture. It was "Stray Kit," the slender, graceful, sociable, beautiful, incomparable cat of cats, the tortoiseshell, curled up as round as a wheel and fast asleep on the vibrant red tablecloth of the dining table, with a bright beam of sunlight shining down on her. I pointed it out, but Susy said she couldn’t see anything there, neither the cat nor the tablecloth. The distance was so short—not more than twenty feet, probably—that if it had been any other child, I wouldn’t have believed her.
From the Biography.
From the bio.
March 14th, '86.—Clara sprained her ankle, a little while ago, by running into a tree, when coasting, and while she was unable to walk with it she played solotaire with cards a great deal. While Clara was sick and papa saw her play solotaire so much, he got very much interested in the game, and finally began to play it himself a little, then Jean took it up, and at last mamma, even played it ocasionally; Jean's and papa's love for it rapidly increased, and now Jean brings the cards every night to the table and papa and mamma help her play, and before dinner is at an end, papa has gotten a separate pack of cards, and is playing alone, with great interest. Mamma and Clara next are made subject to the contagious solatair, and there are four solotaireans at the table; while you hear nothing but "Fill up the place" etc. It is dreadful! after supper Clara goes into the library, and gets a little red mahogany table, and placing it under the gas fixture seats herself and begins to play again, then papa follows with another table of the same discription, and they play solatair till bedtime.
March 14th, '86.—Clara sprained her ankle a little while ago by running into a tree while sledding, and since she couldn't walk, she played solitaire with cards a lot. While Clara was sick and Dad watched her play solitaire so much, he got really interested in the game and eventually started playing it himself a bit. Then Jean picked it up, and before long, Mom even joined in occasionally. Jean's and Dad's love for it grew quickly, and now Jean brings the cards to the table every night, and Dad and Mom help her play. By the time dinner is over, Dad has gotten his own deck of cards and is playing by himself with great interest. Mom and Clara soon catch the solitaire bug too, and there are four solitaire players at the table, with only phrases like "Fill up the spot," etc., being heard. It's terrible! After dinner, Clara goes into the library, grabs a little red mahogany table, sets it under the gas light, sits down, and starts playing again. Then Dad follows her with another table just like it, and they play solitaire until bedtime.
We have just had our Prince and Pauper pictures taken; two groups and some little single ones. The groups (the Interview and Lady Jane Grey scene) were pretty good, the lady Jane scene was perfect, just as pretty as it could be, the Interview was not so good; and two of the little single pictures were very good indeed, but one was very bad. Yet on the whole we think they were a success.
We just had our Prince and Pauper photos taken; two group shots and a few individual ones. The group shots (the Interview and Lady Jane Grey scene) turned out pretty well, with the Lady Jane scene being perfect—just as beautiful as it could be. The Interview shot wasn’t as good; two of the individual pictures were really nice, but one was quite bad. Still, overall, we think they were a success.
Papa has done a great deal in his life I think, that is good, and very remarkable, but I think if he had had the advantages with which he could have developed the gifts which he has made no use of in writing his books, or in any other way for other peoples pleasure and benefit[Pg 121] outside of his own family and intimate friends, he could have done more than he has and a great deal more even. He is known to the public as a humorist, but he has much more in him that is earnest than that is humorous. He has a keen sense of the ludicrous, notices funny stories and incidents knows how to tell them, to improve upon them, and does not forget them. He has been through a great many of the funny adventures related in "Tom Sawyer" and in "Huckleberry Finn," himself and he lived among just such boys, and in just such villages all the days of his early life. His "Prince and Pauper" is his most orriginal, and best production; it shows the most of any of his books what kind of pictures are in his mind, usually. Not that the pictures of England in the 16th Century and the adventures of a little prince and pauper are the kind of things he mainly thinks about; but that that book, and those pictures represent the train of thought and imagination he would be likely to be thinking of to-day, to-morrow, or next day, more nearly than those given in "Tom Sawyer" or "Huckleberry Finn."[13]
Dad has accomplished a lot in his life, which I find impressive and noteworthy. However, I believe that if he had the opportunities to develop the talents he hasn’t used in writing his books or for the enjoyment and benefit of others beyond his family and close friends, he could have achieved even more. He’s recognized by the public as a humorist, but he has much more depth than just humor. He has a sharp sense of the ridiculous, notices funny stories and events, knows how to tell them, embellish them, and remembers them well. He has experienced many of the hilarious adventures found in "Tom Sawyer" and "Huckleberry Finn" himself and grew up among boys just like those in similar small towns throughout his childhood. His "Prince and the Pauper" is his most original and best work; it reveals more of his inner thoughts and images than any of his other books. It’s not that he mainly thinks about England in the 16th Century or the escapades of a little prince and a pauper, but that book and those images more accurately reflect the kinds of thoughts and imagination he’s likely to be engaging with today, tomorrow, or the day after, compared to those presented in "Tom Sawyer" or "Huckleberry Finn."[Pg 121]
Papa can make exceedingly bright jokes, and he enjoys funny things, and when he is with people he jokes and laughs a great deal, but still he is more interested in earnest books and earnest subjects to talk upon, than in humorous ones.[14]
Dad can make really sharp jokes, and he loves funny stuff. When he's around people, he jokes and laughs a lot, but he's actually more interested in serious books and serious topics to discuss than in funny ones.[14]
When we are all alone at home, nine times out of ten, he talks about some very earnest subjects, (with an ocasional joke thrown in) and he a good deal more often talks upon such subjects than upon the other kind.
When we're home alone, nine times out of ten, he brings up some really serious topics, (with an occasional joke here and there) and he talks about those topics a lot more often than he does about the other kind.
He is as much of a Pholosopher as anything I think. I think he could have done a great deal in this direction if he had studied while young, for he seems to enjoy reasoning out things, no matter what; in a great many such directions he has greater ability than in the gifts which have made him famous.
He’s just as much of a philosopher as anything else, I believe. I think he could have accomplished a lot in this area if he had studied when he was younger, because he seems to really enjoy figuring things out, no matter what they are; in many ways, he has more talent in this than in the skills that made him famous.
Thus at fourteen she had made up her mind about me, and in no timorous or uncertain terms had set down her reasons for her opinion. Fifteen years were to pass before any other critic—except Mr. Howells, I think—was to reutter that daring opinion and print it. Right or wrong, it was a brave position for that little analyser to take. She never withdrew it afterward, nor modified it. She has spoken of herself as lacking physical courage, and has evinced her admiration of Clara's; but she had moral courage, which is the rarest of human qualities, and she kept it functionable by exercising it. I think that in questions of morals[Pg 122] and politics she was usually on my side; but when she was not she had her reasons and maintained her ground. Two years after she passed out of my life I wrote a Philosophy. Of the three persons who have seen the manuscript only one understood it, and all three condemned it. If she could have read it, she also would have condemned it, possibly,—probably, in fact—but she would have understood it. It would have had no difficulties for her on that score; also she would have found a tireless pleasure in analyzing and discussing its problems.
At fourteen, she had made up her mind about me and clearly stated her reasons for her opinion without hesitation. It would take fifteen years before any other critic—except Mr. Howells, I think—would echo that bold opinion and publish it. Right or wrong, it was a courageous stance for that little analyst to take. She never retracted it or changed her mind later. She described herself as lacking physical courage and admired Clara's bravery, but she possessed moral courage, which is one of the rarest human qualities, and she kept it alive by using it. In matters of morals[Pg 122] and politics, she usually sided with me; but if she didn't, she had her reasons and stood her ground. Two years after she left my life, I wrote a philosophy book. Of the three people who read the manuscript, only one understood it, and all three criticized it. If she had read it, she too would probably have condemned it, but she definitely would have understood it. The content wouldn’t have posed any difficulties for her, and she would have taken endless joy in analyzing and discussing its issues.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be continued.)
FOOTNOTES:
[13] It is so yet—M. T.
It still is—M. T.
[14] She has said it well and correctly. Humor is a subject which has never had much interest for me. This is why I have never examined it, nor written about it nor used it as a topic for a speech. A hundred times it has been offered me as a topic in these past forty years, but in no case has it attracted me.—M. T.
[14] She expressed it accurately. Humor is a topic that I've never found very interesting. That's why I haven't looked into it, written about it, or used it as a speech topic. I've been offered it as a topic a hundred times over the past forty years, but it has never appealed to me. —M. T.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXVI.
JUNE 7, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XIX.
BY MARK TWAIN.
From Susy's Biography of Me.
From Susy's Bio of Me.
March 23, '86.—The other day was my birthday, and I had a little birthday party in the evening and papa acted some very funny charades with Mr. Gherhardt, Mr. Jesse Grant (who had come up from New York and was spending the evening with us) and Mr. Frank Warner. One of them was "on his knees" honys-sneeze. There were a good many other funny ones, all of which I dont remember. Mr. Grant was very pleasant, and began playing the charades in the most delightful way.
March 23, '86.—The other day was my birthday, and I had a small birthday party in the evening. Dad put on some really funny charades with Mr. Gherhardt, Mr. Jesse Grant (who came up from New York to spend the evening with us), and Mr. Frank Warner. One of the charades was "on his knees" honey-sneeze. There were quite a few other funny ones, but I don’t remember them all. Mr. Grant was really nice and started playing the charades in the most delightful way.
Susy's spelling has defeated me, this time. I cannot make out what "honys-sneeze" stands for. Impromptu charades were almost a nightly pastime of ours, from the children's earliest days—they played in them with me when they were only five or six years old. As they increased in years and practice their love[Pg 242] for the sport almost amounted to a passion, and they acted their parts with a steadily increasing ability. At first they required much drilling; but later they were generally ready as soon as the parts were assigned, and they acted them according to their own devices. Their stage facility and absence of constraint and self-consciousness in the "Prince and Pauper" was a result of their charading practice.
Susy’s spelling has stumped me this time. I can’t figure out what “honys-sneeze” means. Unplanned charades were almost a nightly activity for us, starting when the kids were really young—they played with me when they were just five or six. As they got older and practiced more, their love for the game turned into a real passion, and they performed their roles with increasing skill. At first, they needed a lot of coaching; but later, they were usually ready as soon as the parts were assigned, acting them out however they saw fit. Their ease on stage and lack of self-consciousness in the “Prince and Pauper” came from all that practice with charades.
At ten and twelve Susy wrote plays, and she and Daisy Warner and Clara played them in the library or up-stairs in the school-room, with only themselves and the servants for audience. They were of a tragic and tremendous sort, and were performed with great energy and earnestness. They were dramatized (freely) from English history, and in them Mary Queen of Scots and Elizabeth had few holidays. The clothes were borrowed from the mother's wardrobe and the gowns were longer than necessary, but that was not regarded as a defect. In one of these plays Jean (three years old, perhaps) was Sir Francis Bacon. She was not dressed for the part, and did not have to say anything, but sat silent and decorous at a tiny table and was kept busy signing death-warrants. It was a really important office, for few entered those plays and got out of them alive.
At ten and twelve, Susy wrote plays, and she, Daisy Warner, and Clara performed them in the library or upstairs in the schoolroom, with just themselves and the servants as the audience. They were dramatic and intense, and they put on the shows with a lot of energy and commitment. They were loosely based on English history, and in these plays, Mary Queen of Scots and Elizabeth rarely had a break. The costumes were borrowed from their mother’s wardrobe, and the gowns were longer than needed, but that was not seen as a problem. In one of these plays, Jean, who was about three years old, played Sir Francis Bacon. She wasn’t dressed for the role, and she didn’t have to say anything; she just sat quietly and properly at a tiny table, keeping busy signing death warrants. It was a pretty crucial job because not many characters in those plays survived.
March 26.—Mamma and Papa have been in New York for two or three days, and Miss Corey has been staying with us. They are coming home to-day at two o'clock.
March 26.—Mom and Dad have been in New York for a couple of days, and Miss Corey has been staying with us. They’re coming home today at 2 PM.
Papa has just begun to play chess, and he is very fond of it, so he has engaged to play with Mrs. Charles Warner every morning from 10 to 12, he came down to supper last night, full of this pleasant prospect, but evidently with something on his mind. Finally he said to mamma in an appologetical tone, Susy Warner and I have a plan.
Dad just started playing chess, and he really enjoys it, so he’s agreed to play with Mrs. Charles Warner every morning from 10 to 12. He came down to dinner last night, excited about this great plan, but he clearly had something on his mind. Finally, he told Mom in a bit of an apologetic tone, "Susy Warner and I have a plan."
"Well" mamma said "what now, I wonder?"
"Well," Mom said, "I wonder what’s going on now?"
Papa said that Susy Warner and he were going to name the chess after some of the old bible heroes, and then play chess on Sunday.
Dad said that he and Susy Warner were going to name the chess pieces after some of the old biblical heroes and then play chess on Sunday.
April 18, '86.—Mamma and papa Clara and Daisy have gone to New York to see the "Mikado." They are coming home to-night at half past seven.
April 18, '86.—Mom and Dad, Clara, and Daisy went to New York to see "The Mikado." They’ll be back tonight at 7:30.
Last winter when Mr. Cable was lecturing with papa, he wrote this letter to him just before he came to visit us.
Last winter, when Mr. Cable was giving a lecture with Dad, he wrote this letter to him just before he came to visit us.
Your's and the dear familie's
Yours and the dear family’s
George W. Cable.
George W. Cable.
[December 22, 1906.] It seems a prodigious while ago! Two or three nights ago I dined at a friend's house with a score of other men, and at my side was Cable—actually almost an old man, really almost an old man, that once so young chap! 62 years old, frost on his head, seven grandchildren in stock, and a brand-new wife to re-begin life with!
[December 22, 1906.] It feels like ages ago! A couple of nights ago, I had dinner at a friend's house with about twenty other guys, and sitting next to me was Cable—he's actually almost an old man, really almost an old man, that once so young guy! 62 years old, gray hair, seven grandkids, and a brand-new wife to start a new life with!
[Dictated Nov. 19, 1906.]
[Dictated Nov. 19, 1906.]
Ever since papa and mamma were married, papa has written his books and then taken them to mamma in manuscript and she has expergated them. Papa read "Huckleberry Finn" to us in manuscript just before it came out, and then he would leave parts of it with mamma to expergate, while he went off up to the study to work, and sometimes Clara and I would be sitting with mamma while she was looking the manuscript over, and I remember so well, with what pangs of regret we used to see her turn down the leaves of the pages, which meant that some delightfully dreadful part must be scratched out. And I remember one part pertickularly which was perfectly fascinating it was dreadful, that Clara and I used to delight in, and oh with what dispair we saw mamma turn down the leaf on which it was written, we thought the book would be almost ruined without it. But we gradually came to feel as mamma did.
Since Dad and Mom got married, Dad has been writing his books and bringing them to Mom in manuscript form for her to edit. He read "Huckleberry Finn" to us in manuscript just before it was published, and then he would leave parts of it with Mom to edit while he went up to his study to work. Sometimes Clara and I would sit with Mom while she reviewed the manuscript, and I remember feeling a deep sense of regret as we watched her fold down the corners of the pages, which meant some amazingly awful parts had to be cut. I especially remember one part that was both captivating and horrifying, which Clara and I loved. Oh, how we hated seeing Mom fold down the page with that part on it; we thought the book would be almost ruined without it. But we eventually came to understand Mom's viewpoint.
It would be a pity to replace the vivacity and quaintness and felicity of Susy's innocent free spelling with the dull and petrified uniformities of the spelling-book. Nearly all the grimness it taken out of the "expergating" of my books by the subtle mollification accidentally infused into the word by Susy's modification of the spelling of it.
It would be a shame to swap the energy, charm, and joy of Susy's playful spelling for the boring and lifeless consistency of the spelling book. Most of the seriousness has been removed from the "cleaning up" of my books by the subtle softness accidentally added to the word through Susy's unique way of spelling it.
I remember the special case mentioned by Susy, and can see the group yet—two-thirds of it pleading for the life of the culprit sentence that was so fascinatingly dreadful and the other third of it patiently explaining why the court could not grant the prayer of the pleaders; but I do not remember what the condemned phrase was. It had much company, and they all went to the gallows; but it is possible that that specially dreadful one which gave those little people so much delight was cunningly devised and put into the book for just that function, and not[Pg 244] with any hope or expectation that it would get by the "exper-gator" alive. It is possible, for I had that custom.
I remember the special case Susy talked about, and I can still picture the group—two-thirds of them begging for the life of the culprit with a sentence that was both fascinating and horrifying, while the other third calmly explained why the court couldn’t grant their request; but I don’t remember what the condemned phrase was. It had a lot of company, and they all went to the gallows; but it’s possible that that particularly dreadful one, which brought so much joy to those little people, was cleverly created and included in the book just for that purpose, and not[Pg 244] with any hope or expectation that it would survive the "exper-gator." It’s possible, since I had that habit.
Susy's quaint and effective spelling falls quite opportunely into to-day's atmosphere, which is heavy with the rumblings and grumblings and mutterings of the Simplified Spelling Reform. Andrew Carnegie started this storm, a couple of years ago, by moving a simplifying of English orthography, and establishing a fund for the prosecution and maintenance of the crusade. He began gently. He addressed a circular to some hundreds of his friends, asking them to simplify the spelling of a dozen of our badly spelt words—I think they were only words which end with the superfluous ugh. He asked that these friends use the suggested spellings in their private correspondence.
Susy's charming and effective spelling fits perfectly into today's environment, which is filled with the loud debates and discussions about Simplified Spelling Reform. A couple of years ago, Andrew Carnegie sparked this movement by advocating for a simplification of English spelling and creating a fund to support this mission. He started off gently, sending a letter to hundreds of his friends, asking them to simplify the spelling of about a dozen of our poorly spelled words—I believe they were mainly words that end with the unnecessary ugh. He encouraged these friends to use the suggested spellings in their personal correspondence.
By this, one perceives that the beginning was sufficiently quiet and unaggressive.
By this, one sees that the beginning was quite calm and unthreatening.
Next stage: a small committee was appointed, with Brander Matthews for managing director and spokesman. It issued a list of three hundred words, of average silliness as to spelling, and proposed new and sane spellings for these words. The President of the United States, unsolicited, adopted these simplified three hundred officially, and ordered that they be used in the official documents of the Government. It was now remarked, by all the educated and the thoughtful except the clergy that Sheol was to pay. This was most justly and comprehensively descriptive. The indignant British lion rose, with a roar that was heard across the Atlantic, and stood there on his little isle, gazing, red-eyed, out over the glooming seas, snow-flecked with driving spindrift, and lathing his tail—a most scary spectacle to see.
Next stage: a small committee was appointed, with Brander Matthews as the managing director and spokesperson. It released a list of three hundred words, which had some pretty silly spellings, and suggested new, sensible spellings for these words. The President of the United States, without being asked, officially adopted these simplified three hundred and ordered their use in government documents. It was now noted, by all the educated and thoughtful people except for the clergy, that Sheol was to pay. This was a very accurate and comprehensive description. The outraged British lion rose up, letting out a roar that echoed across the Atlantic, and stood there on his little island, glaring out over the dark, snow-speckled seas, whipping his tail—a pretty terrifying sight to witness.
The lion was outraged because we, a nation of children, without any grown-up people among us, with no property in the language, but using it merely by courtesy of its owner the English nation, were trying to defile the sacredness of it by removing from it peculiarities which had been its ornament and which had made it holy and beautiful for ages.
The lion was furious because we, a nation of kids, without any adults around us, without a real stake in the language and just using it with the permission of its owner, the English nation, were trying to tarnish its sacredness by taking away the unique characteristics that had decorated it and made it revered and beautiful for ages.
In truth there is a certain sardonic propriety in preserving our orthography, since ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred,[Pg 245] borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft and preserving the memory of the revered crime.
Honestly, there's a certain dark humor in keeping our spelling as it is, since our language is a mix that began with a child’s vocabulary of three hundred words and now has grown to two hundred and twenty-five thousand. Except for those original three hundred, every single word has been borrowed, stolen, or snatched from every unguarded language out there. The spelling of each word reveals where it came from and keeps the memory of that cherished heist alive.[Pg 245]
Why is it that I have intruded into this turmoil and manifested a desire to get our orthography purged of its asininities? Indeed I do not know why I should manifest any interest in the matter, for at bottom I disrespect our orthography most heartily, and as heartily disrespect everything that has been said by anybody in defence of it. Nothing professing to be a defence of our ludicrous spellings has had any basis, so far as my observation goes, except sentimentality. In these "arguments" the term venerable is used instead of mouldy, and hallowed instead of devilish; whereas there is nothing properly venerable or antique about a language which is not yet four hundred years old, and about a jumble of imbecile spellings which were grotesque in the beginning, and which grow more and more grotesque with the flight of the years.
Why have I stepped into this chaos and shown a desire to clean up our spelling system? Honestly, I don't know why I should care about it, because deep down, I have little respect for our spelling, and I have just as little respect for everything anyone has said in its defense. As far as I've seen, nothing that claims to defend our ridiculous spellings has any real foundation except for a sense of nostalgia. In these "arguments," the word venerable is used instead of outdated, and hallowed instead of absurd; however, there’s nothing truly venerable or ancient about a language that's not even four hundred years old, or about a mix of silly spellings that were ridiculous from the start and only become more absurd as time goes on.
[Dictated Monday, November 30, 1906.]
[Dictated Monday, Nov 30, 1906.]
Jean and Papa were walking out past the barn the other day when Jean saw some little newly born baby ducks, she exclaimed as she perceived them "I dont see why God gives us so much ducks when Patrick kills them so."
Jean and Dad were walking by the barn recently when Jean spotted some newly hatched ducklings. She exclaimed as she noticed them, "I don’t get why God gives us so many ducks when Patrick just kills them."
Susy is mistaken as to the origin of the ducks. They were not a gift, I bought them. I am not finding fault with her, for that would be most unfair. She is remarkably accurate in her statements as a historian, as a rule, and it would not be just to make much of this small slip of hers; besides I think it was a quite natural slip, for by heredity and habit ours was a religious household, and it was a common thing with us whenever anybody did a handsome thing, to give the credit of it to Providence, without examining into the matter. This may be called automatic religion—in fact that is what it is; it is so used to its work that it can do it without your help or even your privity; out of all the facts and statistics that may be placed before it, it will always get the one result, since it has never been taught to seek any other. It is thus the unreflecting cause of much injustice. As we have seen, it betrayed Susy into an injustice toward me. It had to be automatic, for she would have been[Pg 246] far from doing me an injustice when in her right mind. It was a dear little biographer, and she meant me no harm, and I am not censuring her now, but am only desirous of correcting in advance an erroneous impression which her words would be sure to convey to a reader's mind. No elaboration of this matter is necessary; it is sufficient to say I provided the ducks.
Susy is wrong about where the ducks came from. They weren't a gift; I bought them. I’m not blaming her, because that wouldn’t be fair. Generally, she's quite accurate in her statements as a historian, and it wouldn't be right to make a big deal out of this small mistake of hers. Plus, I think it was a pretty natural slip, since our household was religious by upbringing and habit, and we often attributed any good deeds to Providence without really thinking about it. This can be seen as automatic religion—it's so used to its routine that it can operate without your input or even your awareness; given all the facts and statistics presented to it, it will always arrive at the same conclusion, as it hasn’t been taught to look for any other. As a result, it inadvertently causes a lot of injustice. As we’ve seen, it led Susy to be unfair to me. It had to be automatic because she would never intentionally do me an injustice when she was thinking clearly. She was a sweet little biographer, and she meant no harm to me; I'm not criticizing her now, but instead I just want to correct any misunderstanding that her words might create in a reader's mind. No further explanation is needed; it's enough to say I provided the ducks.
It was in Hartford. The greensward sloped down-hill from the house to the sluggish little river that flowed through the grounds, and Patrick, who was fertile in good ideas, had early conceived the idea of having home-made ducks for our table. Every morning he drove them from the stable down to the river, and the children were always there to see and admire the waddling white procession; they were there again at sunset to see Patrick conduct the procession back to its lodgings in the stable. But this was not always a gay and happy holiday show, with joy in it for the witnesses; no, too frequently there was a tragedy connected with it, and then there were tears and pain for the children. There was a stranded log or two in the river, and on these certain families of snapping-turtles used to congregate and drowse in the sun and give thanks, in their dumb way, to Providence for benevolence extended to them. It was but another instance of misplaced credit; it was the young ducks that those pious reptiles were so thankful for—whereas they were my ducks. I bought the ducks.
It was in Hartford. The grassy area sloped down from the house to the slow-moving little river that flowed through the grounds, and Patrick, always full of good ideas, had early on thought of having home-made ducks for our dinner. Every morning he led them from the stable down to the river, and the children were always there to watch and admire the waddling white parade; they were there again at sunset to see Patrick bring the procession back to its home in the stable. But this wasn’t always a cheerful holiday display, filled with joy for the onlookers; no, too often it ended in tragedy, bringing tears and pain for the children. There were a couple of logs stranded in the river, and on these logs certain families of snapping turtles would gather to bask in the sun and, in their quiet way, express gratitude to Providence for their blessings. It was just another case of misplaced appreciation; it was the young ducks that those grateful reptiles were so thankful for—when in fact they were my ducks. I bought the ducks.
When a crop of young ducks, not yet quite old enough for the table but approaching that age, began to join the procession, and paddle around in the sluggish water, and give thanks—not to me—for that privilege, the snapping-turtles would suspend their songs of praise and slide off the logs and paddle along under the water and chew the feet of the young ducks. Presently Patrick would notice that two or three of those little creatures were not moving about, but were apparently at anchor, and were not looking as thankful as they had been looking a short time before. He early found out what that sign meant—a submerged snapping-turtle was taking his breakfast, and silently singing his gratitude. Every day or two Patrick would rescue and fetch up a little duck with incomplete legs to stand upon—nothing left of their extremities but gnawed and bleeding stumps. Then the children said pitying things and wept—and at dinner we finished the tragedy which the turtles had begun. Thus, as will be seen—out[Pg 247] of season, at least—it was really the turtles that gave us so much ducks. At my expense.
When a batch of young ducks, still a bit too young for the dinner table but getting close, started to join the group, paddling around in the sluggish water and showing their gratitude—not to me—for that privilege, the snapping turtles would stop their songs of praise, slide off the logs, and swim underneath to bite at the feet of the young ducks. Soon, Patrick would notice that two or three of those little creatures weren’t moving and seemed to be stuck, looking less thankful than they had a moment ago. He quickly learned what that meant—an underwater snapping turtle was having its breakfast and quietly singing its thanks. Every couple of days, Patrick would rescue and bring up a little duck with mangled legs—nothing left of their limbs but chewed and bleeding stumps. Then the kids would say sympathetic things and cry—and at dinner, we’d finish the tragedy that the turtles had started. So, as you can see—out[Pg 247] of season, at least—it was really the turtles that provided us with so many ducks. At my expense.
Papa has written a new version of "There is a happy land" it is—
Papa has written a new version of "There is a happy land," and it goes like this—
"There is a boarding houseFar, far away,Where they serve ham and eggs,Three times a day.Oh, don’t those boarders shoutWhen they hear the dinner bell,They give that landlord griefThree times a day."
Again Susy has made a small error. It was not I that wrote the song. I heard Billy Rice sing it in the negro minstrel show, and I brought it home and sang it—with great spirit—for the elevation of the household. The children admired it to the limit, and made me sing it with burdensome frequency. To their minds it was superior to the Battle Hymn of the Republic.
Again, Susy made a little mistake. It wasn't me who wrote the song. I heard Billy Rice perform it in the black minstrel show, and I brought it home and sang it—with a lot of energy—for the enjoyment of our family. The kids loved it so much that they made me sing it way too often. To them, it was better than the Battle Hymn of the Republic.
How many years ago that was! Where now is Billy Rice? He was a joy to me, and so were the other stars of the nigger-show—Billy Birch, David Wambold, Backus, and a delightful dozen of their brethren, who made life a pleasure to me forty years ago, and later. Birch, Wambold, and Backus are gone years ago; and with them departed to return no more forever, I suppose, the real nigger-show—the genuine nigger-show, the extravagant nigger-show,—the show which to me had no peer and whose peer has not yet arrived, in my experience. We have the grand opera; and I have witnessed, and greatly enjoyed, the first act of everything which Wagner created, but the effect on me has always been so powerful that one act was quite sufficient; whenever I have witnessed two acts I have gone away physically exhausted; and whenever I have ventured an entire opera the result has been the next thing to suicide. But if I could have the nigger-show back again, in its pristine purity and perfection, I should have but little further use for opera. It seems to me that to the elevated mind and the sensitive spirit the hand-organ and the nigger-show are a standard and a summit to whose rarefied altitude the other forms of musical art may not hope to reach.
How many years ago was that! Where is Billy Rice now? He was a source of joy for me, as were the other stars of the Black show—Billy Birch, David Wambold, Backus, and a wonderful dozen of their peers, who made life enjoyable for me forty years ago and afterward. Birch, Wambold, and Backus have been gone for years; and with them, I suppose, has vanished the true Black show—the authentic Black show, the extravagant Black show—the show that had no equal in my experience and whose equal has not yet appeared. We have grand opera; I've witnessed and greatly enjoyed the first act of everything Wagner created, but the effect on me has always been so intense that one act was quite enough; whenever I have seen two acts, I've left physically exhausted; and any time I've attempted a complete opera, it felt like close to a suicide mission. But if I could have the Black show back again, in its original purity and perfection, I would have little further use for opera. It seems to me that for the elevated mind and sensitive spirit, the hand-organ and the Black show represent a standard and a peak that other forms of musical art may not hope to reach.
[Dictated September 5, 1906.] It is years since I have examined "The Children's Record." I have turned over a few of its pages this morning. This book is a record in which Mrs. Clemens[Pg 248] and I registered some of the sayings and doings of the children, in the long ago, when they were little chaps. Of course, we wrote these things down at the time because they were of momentary interest—things of the passing hour, and of no permanent value—but at this distant day I find that they still possess an interest for me and also a value, because it turns out that they were registrations of character. The qualities then revealed by fitful glimpses, in childish acts and speeches, remained as a permanency in the children's characters in the drift of the years, and were always afterwards clearly and definitely recognizable.
[Dictated September 5, 1906.] It's been years since I looked at "The Children's Record." This morning, I flipped through a few pages. This book is where Mrs. Clemens[Pg 248] and I noted down some of the things the kids said and did a long time ago when they were little ones. At the time, we jotted these down because they were interesting—just things happening in the moment that didn’t seem to have lasting value—but looking back now, I find they still hold my interest and have significance, because they turned out to be registrations of character. The traits we caught glimpses of in their playful actions and words back then have stayed with them as they grew up and were always recognizable later on.
There is a masterful streak in Jean that now and then moves her to set my authority aside for a moment and end a losing argument in that prompt and effective fashion. And here in this old book I find evidence that she was just like that before she was quite four years old.
There’s a remarkable quality in Jean that occasionally leads her to put my authority aside for a moment and wrap up a losing argument in a quick and effective way. And here in this old book, I see proof that she was exactly like that before she was even four years old.
From The Children's Record. Quarry Farm, July 7, 1884.—Yesterday evening our cows (after being inspected and worshipped by Jean from the shed for an hour,) wandered off down into the pasture, and left her bereft. I thought I was going to get back home, now, but that was an error. Jean knew of some more cows, in a field somewhere, and took my hand and led me thitherward. When we turned the corner and took the right-hand road, I saw that we should presently be out of range of call and sight; so I began to argue against continuing the expedition, and Jean began to argue in favor of it—she using English for light skirmishing, and German for "business." I kept up my end with vigor, and demolished her arguments in detail, one after the other, till I judged I had her about cornered. She hesitated a moment, then answered up sharply:
From The Children's Record. Quarry Farm, July 7, 1884.—Yesterday evening, after being doted on by Jean from the shed for an hour, our cows wandered off into the pasture, leaving her feeling abandoned. I thought I was finally going to head back home, but that was a mistake. Jean had heard about some other cows in a nearby field and took my hand to lead me there. When we turned the corner and took the right road, I realized we would soon be out of earshot and sight, so I started to argue against continuing our little adventure, while Jean argued for it—she used English for casual points and German for serious matters. I held my ground passionately, systematically countering her arguments one by one until I thought I had her cornered. She hesitated for a moment, then replied sharply:
"Wir werden nichts mehr darüber sprechen!" (We won't talk any more about it!)
"We're not going to talk about it anymore!"
It nearly took my breath away; though I thought I might possibly have misunderstood. I said:
It almost took my breath away; although I thought I might have misunderstood. I said:
"Why, you little rascal! Was hast du gesagt?"
"Why, you little rascal! What did you say?"
But she said the same words over again, and in the same decided way. I suppose I ought to have been outraged; but I wasn't, I was charmed. And I suppose I ought to have spanked her; but I didn't, I fraternized with the enemy, and we went on and spent half an hour with the cows.
But she repeated the same words again, in the same firm manner. I guess I should have been outraged; but I wasn't, I was enchanted. And I suppose I should have scolded her; but I didn't, I joined forces with the enemy, and we spent half an hour with the cows.
That incident is followed in the "Record" by the following paragraph, which is another instance of a juvenile characteristic maintaining itself into mature age. Susy was persistently and conscientiously truthful throughout her life with the exception of one interruption covering several months, and perhaps a year.[Pg 249] This was while she was still a little child. Suddenly—not gradually—she began to lie; not furtively, but frankly, openly, and on a scale quite disproportioned to her size. Her mother was so stunned, so nearly paralyzed for a day or two, that she did not know what to do with the emergency. Reasonings, persuasions, beseechings, all went for nothing; they produced no effect; the lying went tranquilly on. Other remedies were tried, but they failed. There is a tradition that success was finally accomplished by whipping. I think the Record says so, but if it does it is because the Record is incomplete. Whipping was indeed tried, and was faithfully kept up during two or three weeks, but the results were merely temporary; the reforms achieved were discouragingly brief.
That incident is followed in the "Record" by the following paragraph, which is another example of a youthful trait lingering into adulthood. Susy was consistently and sincerely truthful throughout her life, except for one interruption that lasted several months, maybe even a year.[Pg 249] This happened while she was still a young child. Suddenly—not gradually—she started to lie; not sneakily, but openly and on a scale quite disproportionate to her age. Her mother was so shocked, almost paralyzed for a day or two, that she didn't know how to handle the situation. Reasoning, persuading, and begging all had no effect; the lying continued peacefully. Other solutions were attempted, but they failed. There’s a belief that success was eventually achieved through spanking. I think the Record mentions this, but if it does, it’s because the Record is incomplete. Spanking was indeed tried and did continue consistently for two or three weeks, but the results were only temporary; the changes made were disappointingly short-lived.
Fortunately for Susy, an incident presently occurred which put a complete stop to all the mother's efforts in the direction of reform. This incident was the chance discovery in Darwin of a passage which said that when a child exhibits a sudden and unaccountable disposition to forsake the truth and restrict itself to lying, the explanation must be sought away back in the past; that an ancestor of the child had had the same disease, at the same tender age; that it was irremovable by persuasion or punishment, and that it had ceased as suddenly and as mysteriously as it had come, when it had run its appointed course. I think Mr. Darwin said that nothing was necessary but to leave the matter alone and let the malady have its way and perish by the statute of limitations.
Fortunately for Susy, something happened that completely stopped her mother’s attempts at reform. This event was the unexpected finding in Darwin’s work of a passage that stated when a child suddenly starts lying for no apparent reason, the answer can be traced back to the past; that an ancestor of the child experienced the same issue at the same young age; that it couldn’t be fixed with persuasion or punishment, and that it ended as suddenly and mysteriously as it began, once it had run its course. I believe Mr. Darwin suggested that all that was needed was to leave it alone and let the issue run its course until it faded away with time.
We had confidence in Darwin, and after that day Susy was relieved of our reformatory persecutions. She went on lying without let or hindrance during several months, or a year; then the lying suddenly ceased, and she became as conscientiously and exactingly truthful as she had been before the attack, and she remained so to the end of her life.
We trusted Darwin, and after that day, Susy was free from our attempts to reform her. She continued to lie without any restrictions for several months, or maybe a year; then the lying stopped abruptly, and she became as conscientious and strict about telling the truth as she had been before the incident, and she stayed that way for the rest of her life.
The paragraph in the Record to which I have been leading up is in my handwriting, and is of a date so long posterior to the time of the lying malady that she had evidently forgotten that truth-speaking had ever had any difficulties for her.
The paragraph in the Record that I've been getting to is in my handwriting, and it's dated so much later than when she was struggling with her illness that she clearly forgot that she ever had any trouble with telling the truth.
Mama was speaking of a servant who had been pretty unveracious, but was now "trying to tell the truth." Susy was a good deal surprised, and said she shouldn't think anybody would have to try to tell the truth.
Mom was talking about a servant who had been pretty dishonest but was now "trying to tell the truth." Susy was really surprised and said she wouldn't think anyone would need to try to tell the truth.
In the Record the children's acts and speeches quite definitely define their characters. Susy's indicated the presence of mentality—thought—and they were generally marked by gravity. She was timid, on her physical side, but had an abundance of moral courage. Clara was sturdy, independent, orderly, practical, persistent, plucky—just a little animal, and very satisfactory. Charles Dudley Warner said Susy was made of mind, and Clara of matter.
In the Record, the children's actions and speeches clearly illustrate their personalities. Susy's showed a thoughtful nature, and they were generally serious. She was shy physically but had a lot of moral courage. Clara was strong, independent, organized, practical, determined, and brave—a real go-getter, and very impressive. Charles Dudley Warner said Susy was made of intellect, and Clara was made of substance.
When Motley, the kitten, died, some one said that the thoughts of the two children need not be inquired into, they could be divined: that Susy was wondering if this was the end of Motley, and had his life been worth while; whereas Clara was merely interested in seeing to it that there should be a creditable funeral.
When Motley, the kitten, died, someone said that the thoughts of the two children didn’t need to be questioned; they could be understood: Susy was wondering if this was the end of Motley and if his life had been meaningful; while Clara was just focused on making sure he had a decent funeral.
In those days Susy was a dreamer, a thinker, a poet and philosopher, and Clara—well, Clara wasn't. In after-years a passion for music developed the latent spirituality and intellectuality in Clara, and her practicality took second and, in fact, even third place. Jean was from the beginning orderly, steady, diligent, persistent; and remains so. She picked up languages easily, and kept them.
In those days, Susy was a dreamer, a thinker, a poet, and philosopher, while Clara—well, Clara wasn’t. Later on, a passion for music brought out the hidden spirituality and intellect in Clara, making her practicality take a back seat, even a third seat. Jean, right from the start, was organized, steady, hardworking, and determined; and she still is. She picked up languages easily and remembered them.
Susy aged eleven, Jean three.—Susy said the other day when she saw Jean bringing a cat to me of her own motion, "Jean has found out already that mamma loves morals and papa loves cats."
Susy, who is eleven, and Jean, who is three.—Susy mentioned the other day when she saw Jean bringing a cat to me by herself, "Jean has already realized that Mom loves lessons and Dad loves cats."
It is another of Susy's remorselessly sound verdicts.
It's another one of Susy's unyieldingly solid judgments.
As a child, Jean neglected my books. When she was nine years old Will Gillette invited her and the rest of us to a dinner at the Murray Hill Hotel in New York, in order that we might get acquainted with Mrs. Leslie and her daughters. Elsie Leslie was nine years old, and was a great celebrity on the stage. Jean was astonished and awed to see that little slip of a thing sit up at table and take part in the conversation of the grown people, capably and with ease and tranquillity. Poor Jean was obliged to keep still, for the subjects discussed never happened to hit her level, but at last the talk fell within her limit and she had her chance to contribute to it. "Tom Sawyer" was mentioned. Jean spoke gratefully up and said,
As a child, Jean ignored my books. When she was nine, Will Gillette invited her and the rest of us to dinner at the Murray Hill Hotel in New York so we could get to know Mrs. Leslie and her daughters. Elsie Leslie was also nine and was a big celebrity on stage. Jean was amazed and impressed to see that little girl sit at the table and join in the adult conversation with confidence and ease. Poor Jean had to stay quiet because the topics didn’t really connect with her, but eventually, the discussion shifted to something she could engage with. "Tom Sawyer" was brought up. Jean eagerly chimed in and said,
"I know who wrote that book—Harriet Beecher Stowe!"
"I know who wrote that book—Harriet Beecher Stowe!"
One evening Susy had prayed, Clara was curled up for sleep; she was reminded that it was her turn to pray now. She laid "Oh! one's enough," and dropped off to slumber.[Pg 251]
One evening, Susy had prayed, and Clara was all snuggled up, getting ready for bed. She remembered it was her turn to pray now. She said, "Oh! One prayer is enough," and then fell asleep.[Pg 251]
Clara five years old.—We were in Germany. The nurse, Rosa, was not allowed to speak to the children otherwise than in German. Clara grew very tired of it; by and by the little creature's patience was exhausted, and she said "Aunt Clara, I wish God had made Rosa in English."
Clara was five years old.—We were in Germany. The nurse, Rosa, was only allowed to speak to the kids in German. Clara got really tired of this; eventually, the little girl’s patience wore thin, and she said, "Aunt Clara, I wish God had made Rosa speak English."
Clara four years old, Susy six.—This morning when Clara discovered that this is my birthday, she was greatly troubled because she had provided no gift for me, and repeated her sorrow several times. Finally she went musing to the nursery and presently returned with her newest and dearest treasure, a large toy horse, and said, "You shall have this horse for your birthday, papa."
Clara is four years old, Susy is six.—This morning, when Clara found out it was my birthday, she was really upset because she hadn’t gotten me a gift and kept expressing her regret over and over. Eventually, she wandered off to the nursery and soon returned with her newest and most beloved possession, a big toy horse, and said, "You can have this horse for your birthday, Dad."
I accepted it with many thanks. After an hour she was racing up and down the room with the horse, when Susy said,
I accepted it with many thanks. After an hour, she was zooming around the room with the horse when Susy said,
"Why Clara, you gave that horse to papa, and now you've tooken it again."
"Why Clara, you gave that horse to Dad, and now you’ve taken it back."
Clara.—"I never give it to him for always; I give it to him for his birthday."
Clara.—"I don’t always give it to him; I only give it to him for his birthday."
In Geneva, in September, I lay abed late one morning, and as Clara was passing through the room I took her on my bed a moment. Then the child went to Clara Spaulding and said,
In Geneva, one September morning, I was lying in bed when Clara walked into the room. I pulled her onto my bed for a moment. After that, the child went to Clara Spaulding and said,
"Aunt Clara, papa is a good deal of trouble to me."
"Aunt Clara, Dad is a lot of trouble for me."
"Is he? Why?"
"Is he? Why?"
"Well, he wants me to get in bed with him, and I can't do that with jelmuls [gentlemen]—I don't like jelmuls anyway."
"Well, he wants me to get into bed with him, and I can't do that with guys—I don't like guys anyway."
"What, you don't like gentlemen! Don't you like Uncle Theodore Crane?"
"What, you don't like gentlemen? Don't you like Uncle Theodore Crane?"
"Oh yes, but he's not a jelmul, he's a friend."
"Oh yeah, but he's not a bad guy, he's a friend."
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
FOOTNOTE:
[15] Cable never travelled Sundays.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Cable never ran on Sundays.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXVIII.
JULY 5, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XX.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Notes on "Innocents Abroad." Dictated in Florence, Italy, April, 1904.]—I will begin with a note upon the dedication. I wrote the book in the months of March and April, 1868, in San Francisco. It was published in August, 1869. Three years afterward Mr. Goodman, of Virginia City, Nevada, on whose newspaper I had served ten years before, came East, and we were walking down Broadway one day when he said: "How did you come to steal Oliver Wendell Holmes's dedication and put it in your book?"
[Notes on "Innocents Abroad." Dictated in Florence, Italy, April, 1904.]—I want to start with a note about the dedication. I wrote the book in March and April of 1868, in San Francisco. It was published in August 1869. Three years later, Mr. Goodman from Virginia City, Nevada, where I had worked for his newspaper ten years earlier, came to the East, and we were walking down Broadway one day when he asked me, "How did you end up stealing Oliver Wendell Holmes's dedication and putting it in your book?"
I made a careless and inconsequential answer, for I supposed he was joking. But he assured me that he was in earnest. He[Pg 466] said: "I'm not discussing the question of whether you stole it or didn't—for that is a question that can be settled in the first bookstore we come to—I am only asking you how you came to steal it, for that is where my curiosity is focalized."
I gave a thoughtless and unimportant response, thinking he was joking. But he insisted that he was serious. He[Pg 466] said: "I'm not debating whether you stole it or not—because that's something we can figure out at the first bookstore we see—I just want to know how you ended up stealing it, because that's where my curiosity lies."
I couldn't accommodate him with this information, as I hadn't it in stock. I could have made oath that I had not stolen anything, therefore my vanity was not hurt nor my spirit troubled. At bottom I supposed that he had mistaken another book for mine, and was now getting himself into an untenable place and preparing sorrow for himself and triumph for me. We entered a bookstore and he asked for "The Innocents Abroad" and for the dainty little blue and gold edition of Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes's poems. He opened the books, exposed their dedications and said: "Read them. It is plain that the author of the second one stole the first one, isn't it?"
I couldn't help him with this information because I didn't have it available. I could swear that I hadn't stolen anything, so my pride wasn’t hurt nor was my spirit upset. Deep down, I figured he had confused another book for mine, and he was now putting himself in a tight spot and setting himself up for disappointment while I enjoyed a victory. We went into a bookstore, and he asked for "The Innocents Abroad" and for the nice little blue and gold edition of Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes's poems. He opened the books, pointed out their dedications, and said, "Read them. It's clear that the author of the second one stole from the first one, right?"
I was very much ashamed, and unspeakably astonished. We continued our walk, but I was not able to throw any gleam of light upon that original question of his. I could not remember ever having seen Dr. Holmes's dedication. I knew the poems, but the dedication was new to me.
I felt really embarrassed and completely shocked. We kept walking, but I couldn’t shed any light on that original question he had. I couldn’t recall ever having seen Dr. Holmes's dedication. I knew the poems, but the dedication was unfamiliar to me.
I did not get hold of the key to that secret until months afterward, then it came in a curious way, and yet it was a natural way; for the natural way provided by nature and the construction of the human mind for the discovery of a forgotten event is to employ another forgotten event for its resurrection.
I didn’t figure out the key to that secret until months later, and when it came, it was in a strange but natural way; because the natural method given by nature and how the human mind works for uncovering a forgotten event is to use another forgotten event to bring it back to life.
I received a letter from the Rev. Dr. Rising, who had been rector of the Episcopal church in Virginia City in my time, in which letter Dr. Rising made reference to certain things which had happened to us in the Sandwich Islands six years before; among things he made casual mention of the Honolulu Hotel's poverty in the matter of literature. At first I did not see the bearing of the remark, it called nothing to my mind. But presently it did—with a flash! There was but one book in Mr. Kirchhof's hotel, and that was the first volume of Dr. Holmes's blue and gold series. I had had a fortnight's chance to get well acquainted with its contents, for I had ridden around the big island (Hawaii) on horseback and had brought back so many saddle boils that if there had been a duty on them it would have bankrupted me to pay it. They kept me in my room, unclothed, and in persistent pain for two weeks, with no company[Pg 467] but cigars and the little volume of poems. Of course I read them almost constantly; I read them from beginning to end, then read them backwards, then began in the middle and read them both ways, then read them wrong end first and upside down. In a word, I read the book to rags, and was infinitely grateful to the hand that wrote it.
I got a letter from Rev. Dr. Rising, who was the rector of the Episcopal church in Virginia City during my time. In his letter, Dr. Rising mentioned a few things that happened to us in the Sandwich Islands six years earlier; among other things, he casually pointed out the lack of literature at the Honolulu Hotel. At first, I didn’t get what he meant—it didn’t ring any bells. But then it hit me! There was only one book in Mr. Kirchhof’s hotel, and it was the first volume of Dr. Holmes’s blue and gold series. I had two weeks to really get to know its contents because I rode around the big island (Hawaii) on horseback and ended up with so many saddle sores that paying for them would have put me in the poorhouse if there’d been a tax on them. They kept me in my room, barely dressed and in constant pain, for two weeks, with no company[Pg 467] except cigars and that little book of poems. Of course, I read it almost non-stop; I read it from cover to cover, then backwards, then started in the middle and read it both ways, and then read it from the back to the front and upside down. In short, I read that book to shreds and was incredibly thankful to the person who wrote it.
Here we have an exhibition of what repetition can do, when persisted in daily and hourly over a considerable stretch of time, where one is merely reading for entertainment, without thought or intention of preserving in the memory that which is read. It is a process which in the course of years dries all the juice out of a familiar verse of Scripture, leaving nothing but a sapless husk behind. In that case you at least know the origin of the husk, but in the case in point I apparently preserved the husk but presently forgot whence it came. It lay lost in some dim corner of my memory a year or two, then came forward when I needed a dedication, and was promptly mistaken by me as a child of my own happy fancy.
Here we have an example of what repetition can do when it's done daily and hourly over a long period, where someone is just reading for fun, without any thought or intention of remembering what they read. It’s a process that over years drains all the meaning out of a familiar verse from Scripture, leaving just a dry shell behind. In that case, you at least know where the shell came from, but in this situation, I seemingly kept the shell but forgot where it came from. It sat lost in some vague corner of my memory for a year or two, then reemerged when I needed a dedication and I mistakenly thought it was something I had created myself.
I was new, I was ignorant, the mysteries of the human mind were a sealed book to me as yet, and I stupidly looked upon myself as a tough and unforgivable criminal. I wrote to Dr. Holmes and told him the whole disgraceful affair, implored him in impassioned language to believe that I had never intended to commit this crime, and was unaware that I had committed it until I was confronted with the awful evidence. I have lost his answer, I could better have afforded to lose an uncle. Of these I had a surplus, many of them of no real value to me, but that letter was beyond price, beyond uncledom, and unsparable. In it Dr. Holmes laughed the kindest and healingest laugh over the whole matter, and at considerable length and in happy phrase assured me that there was no crime in unconscious plagiarism; that I committed it every day, that he committed it every day, that every man alive on the earth who writes or speaks commits it every day and not merely once or twice but every time he opens his mouth; that all our phrasings are spiritualized shadows cast multitudinously from our readings; that no happy phrase of ours is ever quite original with us, there is nothing of our own in it except some slight change born of our temperament, character, environment, teachings and associations; that this slight change differentiates it from another man's[Pg 468] manner of saying it, stamps it with our special style, and makes it our own for the time being; all the rest of it being old, moldy, antique, and smelling of the breath of a thousand generations of them that have passed it over their teeth before!
I was new, I was clueless; the mysteries of the human mind were still a mystery to me, and I foolishly saw myself as a tough and unforgivable criminal. I wrote to Dr. Holmes and told him everything about the disgraceful situation, begging him in passionate terms to believe that I never intended to commit this crime and didn't realize I had done it until I was faced with the terrible evidence. I've lost his reply; I would have preferred to lose an uncle. I had plenty of those, many of them not particularly valuable to me, but that letter was priceless, beyond compare. In it, Dr. Holmes offered the kindest and most healing laugh about the whole issue and, at length and in uplifting words, assured me that there was no crime in unintentional plagiarism; that I did it every day, that he did it every day, that every person on Earth who writes or speaks does it every day, and not just once or twice but every time they open their mouth; that all our expressions are spiritualized shadows drawn from our readings; that no joyful phrase we use is ever entirely original to us, as there's nothing of our own in it except for a slight twist stemming from our personality, character, environment, education, and experiences; that this slight twist differentiates it from someone else's way of saying it, gives it our unique style, and makes it ours for the moment, with all the rest being old, moldy, antique, and echoing the breath of countless generations who have passed it through their lips before!
In the thirty-odd years which have come and gone since then, I have satisfied myself that what Dr. Holmes said was true.
In the thirty-some years that have passed since then, I have confirmed that what Dr. Holmes said was true.
I wish to make a note upon the preface of the "Innocents." In the last paragraph of that brief preface, I speak of the proprietors of the "Daily Alta California" having "waived their rights" in certain letters which I wrote for that journal while absent on the "Quaker City" trip. I was young then, I am white-headed now, but the insult of that word rankles yet, now that I am reading that paragraph for the first time in many years, reading it for the first time since it was written, perhaps. There were rights, it is true—such rights as the strong are able to acquire over the weak and the absent. Early in '66 George Barnes invited me to resign my reportership on his paper, the San Francisco "Morning Call," and for some months thereafter I was without money or work; then I had a pleasant turn of fortune. The proprietors of the "Sacramento Union," a great and influential daily journal, sent me to the Sandwich Islands to write four letters a month at twenty dollars apiece. I was there four or five months, and returned to find myself about the best known honest man on the Pacific Coast. Thomas McGuire, proprietor of several theatres, said that now was the time to make my fortune—strike while the iron was hot!—break into the lecture field! I did it. I announced a lecture on the Sandwich Islands, closing the advertisement with the remark, "Admission one dollar; doors open at half-past 7, the trouble begins at 8." A true prophecy. The trouble certainly did begin at 8, when I found myself in front of the only audience I had ever faced, for the fright which pervaded me from head to foot was paralyzing. It lasted two minutes and was as bitter as death, the memory of it is indestructible, but it had its compensations, for it made me immune from timidity before audiences for all time to come. I lectured in all the principal Californian towns and in Nevada, then lectured once or twice more in San Francisco, then retired from the field rich—for me—and laid out a plan to sail Westward from San Francisco, and go around the world. The proprietors of the "Alta" engaged me[Pg 469] to write an account of the trip for that paper—fifty letters of a column and a half each, which would be about two thousand words per letter, and the pay to be twenty dollars per letter.
I want to make a note about the preface of the "Innocents." In the last paragraph of that short preface, I mention that the owners of the "Daily Alta California" had "waived their rights" to certain letters I wrote for the paper while I was away on the "Quaker City" trip. I was young then, and now I'm gray-haired, but the sting of that word still bothers me, especially as I read that paragraph for the first time in many years, perhaps since it was written. It's true that there were rights—those rights that the strong can take from the weak and the absent. In early '66, George Barnes encouraged me to resign my reporting job at his paper, the San Francisco "Morning Call," and for several months, I was without money or work; then I had a fortunate turn of events. The owners of the "Sacramento Union," a major and influential daily paper, sent me to the Sandwich Islands to write four letters each month at twenty dollars each. I spent four or five months there and returned to find myself one of the most well-known honest men on the Pacific Coast. Thomas McGuire, who owned several theaters, said this was the time to make my fortune—strike while the iron is hot!—and break into the lecture circuit! So I did. I announced a lecture on the Sandwich Islands, finishing the advertisement with the line, "Admission one dollar; doors open at 7:30, trouble starts at 8." That turned out to be an accurate prediction. The trouble certainly did begin at 8, when I found myself in front of the first audience I had ever faced, and the fear that swept through me from head to toe was paralyzing. It lasted two minutes and was painfully intense; the memory of it is unforgettable, but there were benefits, as it made me fearless in front of audiences for all time. I lectured in all the major towns in California and in Nevada, then gave one or two more lectures in San Francisco before stepping back from that scene, richer than I had ever been, and planned to sail west from San Francisco and go around the world. The owners of the "Alta" hired me[Pg 469] to write about the trip for that paper—fifty letters of a column and a half each, which would be about two thousand words per letter, with a payment of twenty dollars per letter.
I went East to St. Louis to say good-bye to my mother, and then I was bitten by the prospectus of Captain Duncan of the "Quaker City" excursion, and I ended by joining it. During the trip I wrote and sent the fifty letters; six of them miscarried, and I wrote six new ones to complete my contract. Then I put together a lecture on the trip and delivered it in San Francisco at great and satisfactory pecuniary profit, then I branched out into the country and was aghast at the result: I had been entirely forgotten, I never had people enough in my houses to sit as a jury of inquest on my lost reputation! I inquired into this curious condition of things and found that the thrifty owners of that prodigiously rich "Alta" newspaper had copyrighted all those poor little twenty-dollar letters, and had threatened with prosecution any journal which should venture to copy a paragraph from them!
I went East to St. Louis to say goodbye to my mother, and then I got really interested in the prospectus from Captain Duncan for the "Quaker City" excursion, and I ended up joining it. During the trip, I wrote and sent out fifty letters; six of them got lost, so I wrote six new ones to fulfill my contract. After that, I put together a lecture about the trip and delivered it in San Francisco, making a good amount of money from it. Then, I expanded my efforts into the countryside and was shocked by the outcome: I had been completely forgotten; I didn’t even have enough people in my houses to form a jury to investigate my lost reputation! I looked into this strange situation and discovered that the savvy owners of the incredibly wealthy "Alta" newspaper had copyrighted all those poor little twenty-dollar letters and had threatened to sue any publication that dared to copy a paragraph from them!
And there I was! I had contracted to furnish a large book, concerning the excursion, to the American Publishing Co. of Hartford, and I supposed I should need all those letters to fill it out with. I was in an uncomfortable situation—that is, if the proprietors of this stealthily acquired copyright should refuse to let me use the letters. That is just what they did; Mr. Mac—something—I have forgotten the rest of his name—said his firm were going to make a book out of the letters in order to get back the thousand dollars which they had paid for them. I said that if they had acted fairly and honorably, and had allowed the country press to use the letters or portions of them, my lecture-skirmish on the coast would have paid me ten thousand dollars, whereas the "Alta" had lost me that amount. Then he offered a compromise: he would publish the book and allow me ten per cent. royalty on it. The compromise did not appeal to me, and I said so. I was now quite unknown outside of San Francisco, the book's sale would be confined to that city, and my royalty would not pay me enough to board me three months; whereas my Eastern contract, if carried out, could be profitable to me, for I had a sort of reputation on the Atlantic seaboard acquired through the publication of six excursion-letters in the New York "Tribune" and one or two in the "Herald."
And there I was! I had signed a contract to put together a big book about the trip for the American Publishing Co. of Hartford, and I thought I would need all those letters to complete it. I was in a tough spot—especially if the owners of this secretly obtained copyright wouldn’t let me use the letters. And that’s exactly what they did; Mr. Mac—something—I can’t remember the rest of his name—said his company planned to create a book from the letters to recoup the thousand dollars they had spent on them. I told him that if they had acted fairly and allowed local newspapers to use the letters or parts of them, my lecture tour on the coast would have earned me ten thousand dollars, while the "Alta" actually cost me that much. Then he suggested a compromise: he would publish the book and give me a ten percent royalty. The compromise didn’t interest me, and I made that clear. I was now pretty much unknown outside of San Francisco, the book’s sales would be limited to that city, and my royalty wouldn’t even cover three months of rent; meanwhile, my Eastern contract, if fulfilled, could be profitable because I had built a bit of a reputation on the East Coast through six excursion letters published in the New York "Tribune" and a couple in the "Herald."
[Pg 470]In the end Mr. Mac agreed to suppress his book, on certain conditions: in my preface I must thank the "Alta" for waiving "rights" and granting me permission. I objected to the thanks. I could not with any large degree of sincerity thank the "Alta" for bankrupting my lecture-raid. After considerable debate my point was conceded and the thanks left out.
[Pg 470]In the end, Mr. Mac agreed to hold back his book under certain conditions: in my preface, I had to thank the "Alta" for waiving its "rights" and giving me permission. I objected to the thanks. I couldn't sincerely thank the "Alta" for ruining my lecture tour. After a lot of debate, my point was accepted and the thanks were omitted.
Noah Brooks was the editor of the "Alta" at the time, a man of sterling character and equipped with a right heart, also a good historian where facts were not essential. In biographical sketches of me written many years afterward (1902), he was quite eloquent in praises of the generosity of the "Alta" people in giving to me without compensation a book which, as history had afterward shown, was worth a fortune. After all the fuss, I did not levy heavily upon the "Alta" letters. I found that they were newspaper matter, not book matter. They had been written here and there and yonder, as opportunity had given me a chance working-moment or two during our feverish flight around about Europe or in the furnace-heat of my stateroom on board the "Quaker City," therefore they were loosely constructed, and needed to have some of the wind and water squeezed out of them. I used several of them—ten or twelve, perhaps. I wrote the rest of "The Innocents Abroad" in sixty days, and I could have added a fortnight's labor with the pen and gotten along without the letters altogether. I was very young in those days, exceedingly young, marvellously young, younger than I am now, younger than I shall ever be again, by hundreds of years. I worked every night from eleven or twelve until broad day in the morning, and as I did two hundred thousand words in the sixty days, the average was more than three thousand words a day—nothing for Sir Walter Scott, nothing for Louis Stevenson, nothing for plenty of other people, but quite handsome for me. In 1897, when we were living in Tedworth Square, London, and I was writing the book called "Following the Equator" my average was eighteen hundred words a day; here in Florence (1904), my average seems to be fourteen hundred words per sitting of four or five hours.[16]
Noah Brooks was the editor of the "Alta" at that time, a man of strong character with a good heart, and a decent historian where facts weren’t the main focus. In biographical sketches about me written many years later (1902), he praised the generosity of the "Alta" staff for giving me a book without expecting anything in return, a book that, as history later revealed, was worth a fortune. Despite all the commotion, I didn’t rely too heavily on the "Alta" letters. I noticed they were written as newspaper content, not for a book. They had been drafted here and there whenever I had a moment while rushing around Europe or during the sweltering heat in my stateroom on the "Quaker City," so they were a bit scattered and needed some editing. I used several of them—maybe ten or twelve. I wrote the rest of "The Innocents Abroad" in sixty days, and I could have spent another two weeks writing by hand and still managed without the letters. I was really young back then, exceptionally young, younger than I am now, younger than I will ever be again, by hundreds of years. I worked every night from eleven or midnight until morning, and since I produced two hundred thousand words in those sixty days, that averaged more than three thousand words a day—nothing compared to Sir Walter Scott or Louis Stevenson or many others, but quite impressive for me. In 1897, when we were living in Tedworth Square, London, and I was writing "Following the Equator," my average was eighteen hundred words a day; here in Florence (1904), my average seems to be fourteen hundred words per four or five-hour session.[16]
I was deducing from the above that I have been slowing down steadily in these thirty-six years, but I perceive that my[Pg 471] statistics have a defect: three thousand words in the spring of 1868 when I was working seven or eight or nine hours at a sitting has little or no advantage over the sitting of to-day, covering half the time and producing half the output. Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force:
I’ve realized that I’ve been gradually slowing down over these thirty-six years, but I notice that my[Pg 471] stats have a flaw: three thousand words in the spring of 1868, when I was working seven, eight, or nine hours straight, doesn’t really compare to today’s shorter sessions, which take half the time and yield half the output. Numbers often trick me, especially when I’m the one organizing them; in that case, the saying attributed to Disraeli often applies with fairness and impact:
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."
"There are three types of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics."
[Dictated, January 23, 1907.]—The proverb says that Providence protects children and idiots. This is really true. I know it because I have tested it. It did not protect George through the most of his campaign, but it saved him in his last inning, and the veracity of the proverb stood confirmed.
[Dictated, January 23, 1907.]—The saying goes that fate looks out for kids and fools. This is definitely true. I know it because I've experienced it. It didn’t help George through most of his campaign, but it did save him in the end, proving the saying right.
I have several times been saved by this mysterious interposition, when I was manifestly in extreme peril. It has been common, all my life, for smart people to perceive in me an easy prey for selfish designs, and I have walked without suspicion into the trap set for me, yet have often come out unscathed, against all the likelihoods. More than forty years ago, in San Francisco, the office staff adjourned, upon conclusion of its work at two o'clock in the morning, to a great bowling establishment where there were twelve alleys. I was invited, rather perfunctorily, and as a matter of etiquette—by which I mean that I was invited politely, but not urgently. But when I diffidently declined, with thanks, and explained that I knew nothing about the game, those lively young fellows became at once eager and anxious and urgent to have my society. This flattered me, for I perceived no trap, and I innocently and gratefully accepted their invitation. I was given an alley all to myself. The boys explained the game to me, and they also explained to me that there would be an hour's play, and that the player who scored the fewest ten-strikes in the hour would have to provide oysters and beer for the combination. This disturbed me very seriously, since it promised me bankruptcy, and I was sorry that this detail had been overlooked in the beginning. But my pride would not allow me to back out now, so I stayed in, and did what I could to look satisfied and glad I had come. It is not likely that I looked as contented as I wanted to, but the others looked glad enough to make up for it, for they were quite unable to hide their evil joy. They showed me how to stand,[Pg 472] and how to stoop, and how to aim the ball, and how to let fly; and then the game began. The results were astonishing. In my ignorance I delivered the balls in apparently every way except the right one; but no matter—during half an hour I never started a ball down the alley that didn't score a ten-strike, every time, at the other end. The others lost their grip early, and their joy along with it. Now and then one of them got a ten-strike, but the occurrence was so rare that it made no show alongside of my giant score. The boys surrendered at the end of the half-hour, and put on their coats and gathered around me and in courteous, but sufficiently definite, language expressed their opinion of an experience-worn and seasoned expert who would stoop to lying and deception in order to rob kind and well-meaning friends who had put their trust in him under the delusion that he was an honest and honorable person. I was not able to convince them that I had not lied, for now my character was gone, and they refused to attach any value to anything I said. The proprietor of the place stood by for a while saying nothing, then he came to my defence. He said: "It looks like a mystery, gentlemen, but it isn't a mystery after it's explained. That is a grooved alley; you've only to start a ball down it any way you please and the groove will do the rest; it will slam the ball against the northeast curve of the head pin every time, and nothing can save the ten from going down."
I’ve been saved by this strange intervention more than once when I was clearly in serious danger. Throughout my life, smart people have often seen me as an easy target for their selfish plans, and I’ve walked right into the trap they set for me, yet somehow I’ve often managed to come out unharmed against all odds. Over forty years ago, in San Francisco, the office staff wrapped up their work at two in the morning and decided to head to a big bowling alley with twelve lanes. I was invited in a rather casual way—as a matter of politeness, meaning I was asked nicely but not very insistently. When I hesitantly declined, thanking them and saying I didn’t know anything about the game, these lively young guys suddenly became eager and anxious for my company. This flattered me since I didn’t see any trap, so I innocently and gratefully accepted their invitation. I was given my own lane. The guys explained the game to me, and they also told me there would be an hour of play, and the player who got the fewest strikes would have to buy oysters and beer for everyone. This seriously troubled me because it meant I was likely to go broke, and I regretted that this detail hadn’t been mentioned earlier. But my pride wouldn’t let me back out now, so I stayed and tried to look pleased and happy to be there. I probably didn’t look as content as I wanted to, but the others looked happy enough to make up for it; they couldn’t hide their delight. They showed me how to stand, how to bend down, how to aim the ball, and how to throw it; then the game started. The results were shocking. In my cluelessness, I rolled the balls in seemingly every way except the right one; but it didn’t matter—over half an hour, I never sent a ball down the lane that didn’t score a strike every time. The others quickly lost their focus, and their joy went with it. Occasionally, one of them would get a strike, but it happened so rarely that it hardly compared to my impressive score. At the end of the half-hour, the boys gave up, put on their coats, and gathered around me, expressing their opinions in polite but clear terms about a supposed experienced expert who would stoop to lying and deception to cheat kind-hearted friends who trusted him, thinking he was an honest person. I couldn’t convince them that I hadn't lied; by now, my reputation was ruined, and they ignored anything I said. The owner of the place stood by for a moment without saying anything, then came to my defense. He said: "It looks like a mystery, gentlemen, but it’s not a mystery once it’s explained. That’s a grooved lane; you can start a ball down it any way you want, and the groove will handle the rest; it will slam the ball against the northeast curve of the head pin every time, and nothing can stop the ten from going down."
It was true. The boys made the experiment and they found that there was no art that could send a ball down that alley and fail to score a ten-strike with it. When I had told those boys that I knew nothing about that game I was speaking only the truth; but it was ever thus, all through my life: whenever I have diverged from custom and principle and uttered a truth, the rule has been that the hearer hadn't strength of mind enough to believe it.
It was true. The boys conducted the experiment and discovered that there was no skill involved in sending a ball down that alley without getting a strike. When I told those boys that I didn't know anything about that game, I was being completely honest; but that had always been the case throughout my life: whenever I strayed from tradition and principle and spoke the truth, the tendency was that the listener didn't have the mental clarity to accept it.
A quarter of a century ago I arrived in London to lecture a few weeks under the management of George Dolby, who had conducted the Dickens readings in America five or six years before. He took me to the Albemarle and fed me, and in the course of the dinner he enlarged a good deal, and with great satisfaction, upon his reputation as a player of fifteen-ball pool, and when he learned by my testimony that I had never seen the game played, and knew nothing of the art of pocketing[Pg 473] balls, he enlarged more and more, and still more, and kept on enlarging, until I recognized that I was either in the presence of the very father of fifteen-ball pool or in the presence of his most immediate descendant. At the end of the dinner Dolby was eager to introduce me to the game and show me what he could do. We adjourned to the billiard-room and he framed the balls in a flat pyramid and told me to fire at the apex ball and then go on and do what I could toward pocketing the fifteen, after which he would take the cue and show me what a past-master of the game could do with those balls. I did as required. I began with the diffidence proper to my ignorant estate, and when I had finished my inning all the balls were in the pockets and Dolby was burying me under a volcanic irruption of acid sarcasms.
Twenty-five years ago, I came to London to give a few weeks of lectures under George Dolby, who had managed the Dickens readings in America five or six years earlier. He took me to the Albemarle and treated me to dinner, during which he proudly talked about his reputation as a player of fifteen-ball pool. When he found out that I had never seen the game played and had no idea how to pocket[Pg 473] balls, he went on and on, getting more and more animated. I began to feel like I was either in the presence of the father of fifteen-ball pool or his closest heir. At the end of dinner, Dolby was excited to introduce me to the game and show off his skills. We moved to the billiard room, where he set up the balls in a flat pyramid and told me to aim at the ball at the top, then do my best to pocket the fifteen balls. After that, he would take the cue and demonstrate what a master of the game could do. I followed his instructions, starting out with the nervousness that came from my lack of experience, and by the time I finished my turn, all the balls had gone into the pockets, and Dolby was burying me under a flood of sarcastic comments.
So I was a liar in Dolby's belief. He thought he had been sold, and at a cheap rate; but he divided his sarcasms quite fairly and quite equally between the two of us. He was full of ironical admiration of his childishness and innocence in letting a wandering and characterless and scandalous American load him up with deceptions of so transparent a character that they ought not to have deceived the house cat. On the other hand, he was remorselessly severe upon me for beguiling him, by studied and discreditable artifice, into bragging and boasting about his poor game in the presence of a professional expert disguised in lies and frauds, who could empty more balls in billiard pockets in an hour than he could empty into a basket in a day.
So I was a liar in Dolby's eyes. He believed he had been cheated, and at a low price; but he spread his sarcasm equally between the two of us. He was full of ironic admiration for his own childishness and innocence in allowing a wandering, characterless, and scandalous American to trick him with deceptions so obvious that even a house cat wouldn’t fall for them. On the other hand, he was ruthlessly harsh on me for leading him, through manipulative and disgraceful tricks, into bragging about his poor skills in front of a professional expert disguised with falsehoods, who could sink more balls in the billiard pockets in an hour than he could make in a basket in a day.
In the matter of fifteen-ball pool I never got Dolby's confidence wholly back, though I got it in other ways, and kept it until his death. I have played that game a number of times since, but that first time was the only time in my life that I have ever pocketed all the fifteen in a single inning.
In the case of fifteen-ball pool, I never fully regained Dolby's trust, although I did in other ways and maintained it until he passed away. I've played that game several times since, but that first time was the only occasion in my life when I cleared all fifteen balls in a single turn.
My unsuspicious nature has made it necessary for Providence to save me from traps a number of times. Thirty years ago, a couple of Elmira bankers invited me to play the game of "Quaker" with them. I had never heard of the game before, and said that if it required intellect, I should not be able to entertain them. But they said it was merely a game of chance, and required no mentality—so I agreed to make a trial of it. They appointed four in the afternoon for the sacrifice. As the place, they chose a ground-floor room with a large win[Pg 474]dow in it. Then they went treacherously around and advertised the "sell" which they were going to play upon me.
My trusting nature has meant that fate has had to rescue me from traps several times. Thirty years ago, a couple of bankers from Elmira invited me to play a game called "Quaker" with them. I had never heard of it before and mentioned that if it required any brains, I probably wouldn’t be able to entertain them. But they assured me it was just a game of chance and didn’t require any smarts—so I agreed to give it a shot. They scheduled the game for four in the afternoon and chose a ground-floor room with a large window. Then they sneakily went around and advertised the "con" they were planning to pull on me.
I arrived on time, and we began the game—with a large and eager free-list to superintend it. These superintendents were outside, with their noses pressed against the window-pane. The bankers described the game to me. So far as I recollect, the pattern of it was this: they had a pile of Mexican dollars on the table; twelve of them were of even date, fifty of them were of odd dates. The bankers were to separate a coin from the pile and hide it under a hand, and I must guess "odd" or "even." If I guessed correctly, the coin would be mine; if incorrectly, I lost a dollar. The first guess I made was "even," and was right. I guessed again, "even," and took the money. They fed me another one and I guessed "even" again, and took the money. I guessed "even" the fourth time, and took the money. It seemed to me that "even" was a good guess, and I might as well stay by it, which I did. I guessed "even" twelve times, and took the twelve dollars. I was doing as they secretly desired. Their experience of human nature had convinced them that any human being as innocent as my face proclaimed me to be, would repeat his first guess if it won, and would go on repeating it if it should continue to win. It was their belief that an innocent would be almost sure at the beginning to guess "even," and not "odd," and that if an innocent should guess "even" twelve times in succession and win every time, he would go on guessing "even" to the end—so it was their purpose to let me win those twelve even dates and then advance the odd dates, one by one, until I should lose fifty dollars, and furnish those superintendents something to laugh about for a week to come.
I arrived on time, and we started the game—with a large and eager crowd watching. These spectators were outside, pressing their noses against the window. The dealers explained the game to me. As far as I remember, here's how it went: they had a stack of Mexican dollars on the table; twelve of them were even dates, and fifty of them were odd dates. The dealers would take a coin from the pile and hide it under a hand, and I had to guess "odd" or "even." If I guessed right, I would keep the coin; if I guessed wrong, I would lose a dollar. My first guess was "even," and I was correct. I guessed "even" again and took the money. They gave me another one, and I guessed "even" again, and took the money. I guessed "even" for the fourth time and took the money again. It seemed to me that "even" was a good guess, so I decided to stick with it. I guessed "even" twelve times and won all twelve dollars. I was doing exactly what they secretly hoped for. Their experience with people had convinced them that someone as innocent as I appeared would stick with their first successful guess and keep repeating it as long as it continued to win. They believed that an innocent person would likely guess "even" at first rather than "odd," and if such a person guessed "even" correctly twelve times in a row, they would keep guessing "even" to the end—so their plan was to let me win those twelve even dates and then introduce the odd dates one by one until I lost fifty dollars, giving those spectators something to laugh about for a whole week.
But it did not come out in that way; for by the time I had won the twelfth dollar and last even date, I withdrew from the game because it was so one-sided that it was monotonous, and did not entertain me. There was a burst of laughter from the superintendents at the window when I came out of the place, but I did not know what they were laughing at nor whom they were laughing at, and it was a matter of no interest to me anyway. Through that incident I acquired an enviable reputation for smartness and penetration, but it was not my due, for I had not penetrated anything that the cow could not have penetrated.
But it didn’t play out like that; when I won the twelfth dollar and the last even bet, I decided to leave the game because it was so one-sided that it got boring and didn’t entertain me anymore. There was a burst of laughter from the supervisors at the window when I walked out of the place, but I didn’t know what they were laughing at or who they were laughing at, and honestly, I didn’t care. Because of that incident, I gained a reputation for being clever and perceptive, but it wasn’t deserved since I hadn’t figured out anything that a cow couldn’t have figured out.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain
(To be Continued.)
To be continued.
FOOTNOTE:
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXX.
AUGUST 2, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXI.
BY MARK TWAIN.
From Susy's Biography of Me.
From Susy's Bio of Me.
Feb. 12, '86.
Feb. 12, '86.
Mamma and I have both been very much troubled of late because papa since he has been publishing Gen. Grant's book has seemed to forget his own books and work entirely, and the other evening as papa and I were promonading up and down the library he told me that he didn't expect to write but one more book, and then he was ready to give up work altogether, die, or do anything, he said that he had written more than he had ever expected to, and the only book that he had been pertickularly anxious to write was one locked up in the safe down stairs, not yet published.[17]
Mom and I have been really worried lately because ever since Dad started publishing General Grant's book, he seems to have completely forgotten about his own books and work. The other evening, while Dad and I were pacing back and forth in the library, he told me he didn't plan to write any more books after one last one, and then he was ready to give up work entirely, die, or do whatever. He mentioned that he had written more than he ever expected to, and the only book he was particularly eager to write was one locked up in the safe downstairs, which hasn't been published yet.[17]
But this intended future of course will never do, and although papa usually holds to his own opinions and intents with outsiders, when[Pg 690] mamma realy desires anything and says that it must be, papa allways gives up his plans (at least so far) and does as she says is right (and she is usually right, if she dissagrees with him at all). It was because he knew his great tendency to being convinced by her, that he published without her knowledge that article in the "Christian Union" concerning the government of children. So judging by the proofs of past years, I think that we will be able to persuade papa to go back to work as before, and not leave off writing with the end of his next story. Mamma says that she sometimes feels, and I do too, that she would rather have papa depend on his writing for a living than to have him think of giving it up.
But this future he’s planned, of course, won't work out, and even though Dad usually sticks to his own opinions and intentions when dealing with others, when Mom really wants something and insists it must happen, Dad always changes his plans (at least so far) and does what she thinks is right (and she's usually right if she disagrees with him at all). It was because he knew he often gets convinced by her that he published that article in the "Christian Union" about child-rearing without telling her. So, based on what we've seen in the past, I believe we can convince Dad to return to work like he used to and not stop writing after he finishes his next story. Mom says that sometimes she feels, and I do too, that she'd prefer Dad rely on his writing for a living rather than consider giving it up.
[Dictated, November 8, 1906.] I have a defect of a sort which I think is not common; certainly I hope it isn't: it is rare that I can call before my mind's eye the form and face of either friend or enemy. If I should make a list, now, of persons whom I know in America and abroad—say to the number of even an entire thousand—it is quite unlikely that I could reproduce five of them in my mind's eye. Of my dearest and most intimate friends, I could name eight whom I have seen and talked with four days ago, but when I try to call them before me they are formless shadows. Jean has been absent, this past eight or ten days, in the country, and I wish I could reproduce her in the mirror of my mind, but I can't do it.
[Dictated, November 8, 1906.] I have a sort of flaw that I think isn't common; I really hope it's not. It's rare for me to clearly picture the form and face of either a friend or an enemy. If I were to make a list right now of the people I know in America and abroad—let's say around a thousand—it's highly unlikely I could visualize even five of them in my mind. Even for my closest and most intimate friends, I could name eight whom I saw and talked to just four days ago, but when I attempt to picture them, they appear as formless shadows. Jean has been away in the countryside for the past eight or ten days, and I wish I could see her in my mind, but I can't.
It may be that this defect is not constitutional, but a result of lifelong absence of mind and indolent and inadequate observation. Once or twice in my life it has been an embarrassment to me. Twenty years ago, in the days of Susy's Biography of Me, there was a dispute one morning at the breakfast-table about the color of a neighbor's eyes. I was asked for a verdict, but had to confess that if that valued neighbor and old friend had eyes I was not sure that I had ever seen them. It was then mockingly suggested that perhaps I didn't even know the color of the eyes of my own family, and I was required to shut my own at once and testify. I was able to name the color of Mrs. Clemens's eyes, but was not able to even suggest a color for Jean's, or Clara's, or Susy's.
It might be that this flaw isn't natural but comes from a lifetime of absent-mindedness and lazy, insufficient observation. A couple of times in my life, it has embarrassed me. Twenty years ago, during the times of Susy's Biography of Me, there was a disagreement one morning at the breakfast table about the color of a neighbor's eyes. I was asked to give my opinion, but I had to admit that if that valued neighbor and old friend had eyes, I wasn’t even sure I had ever seen them. It was then jokingly suggested that maybe I didn't even know the color of my own family's eyes, and I was asked to close my own eyes and make a guess. I could name the color of Mrs. Clemens's eyes, but I couldn't even suggest a color for Jean's, Clara's, or Susy's.
All this talk is suggested by Susy's remark: "The other evening as papa and I were promenading up and down the library." Down to the bottom of my heart I am thankful that I can see that picture! And it is not dim, but stands out clear in the unfaded light of twenty-one years ago. In those days[Pg 691] Susy and I used to "promonade" daily up and down the library, with our arms about each other's waists, and deal in intimate communion concerning affairs of State, or the deep questions of human life, or our small personal affairs.
All this talk comes from Susy's comment: "The other evening, when Dad and I were strolling back and forth in the library." I’m truly grateful that I can picture that scene! And it’s not blurry, but stands out clearly in the bright light of twenty-one years ago. Back then[Pg 691], Susy and I would "stroll" every day in the library, with our arms around each other's waists, sharing our thoughts on government issues, the big questions of life, or our own little matters.
It was quite natural that I should think I had written myself out when I was only fifty years old, for everybody who has ever written has been smitten with that superstition at about that age. Not even yet have I really written myself out. I have merely stopped writing because dictating is pleasanter work, and because dictating has given me a strong aversion to the pen, and because two hours of talking per day is enough, and because—But I am only damaging my mind with this digging around in it for pretexts where no pretext is needed, and where the simple truth is for this one time better than any invention, in this small emergency. I shall never finish my five or six unfinished books, for the reason that by forty years of slavery to the pen I have earned my freedom. I detest the pen and I wouldn't use it again to sign the death warrant of my dearest enemy.
It was completely understandable that I thought I had run out of things to say at only fifty, since anyone who has ever written has felt that way around this age. I haven't really run out of ideas, though. I've just stopped writing because dictating feels more enjoyable, and it has made me really dislike using a pen. Plus, two hours of talking each day is plenty, and because—But I’m only harming my mind by trying to come up with excuses when none are needed, and the simple truth is better this time than any excuse, especially in this minor situation. I’ll never finish my five or six unfinished books because I've earned my freedom after forty years of being tied to the pen. I can't stand the pen and wouldn’t use it again to sign the death warrant of my worst enemy.
[Dictated, March 8, 1906.] For thirty years, I have received an average of a dozen letters a year from strangers who remember me, or whose fathers remember me as boy and young man. But these letters are almost always disappointing. I have not known these strangers nor their fathers. I have not heard of the names they mention; the reminiscences to which they call attention have had no part in my experience; all of which means that these strangers have been mistaking me for somebody else. But at last I have the refreshment, this morning, of a letter from a man who deals in names that were familiar to me in my boyhood. The writer encloses a newspaper clipping which has been wandering through the press for four or five weeks, and he wants to know if Capt Tonkray, lately deceased, was (as stated in the clipping) the original of "Huckleberry Finn."
[Dictated, March 8, 1906.] For thirty years, I've received about a dozen letters a year from strangers who remember me, or whose fathers remember me as a boy and young man. But these letters are almost always disappointing. I haven’t known these strangers or their fathers. I haven't heard of the names they mention; the memories they refer to have had no part in my life; which means these strangers have mistaken me for someone else. However, this morning, I finally received a refreshing letter from a guy who mentions names I knew in my childhood. The writer includes a newspaper clipping that has been circulating for four or five weeks, and he wants to know if Capt Tonkray, who recently passed away, was (as the clipping states) the inspiration for "Huckleberry Finn."
I have replied that "Huckleberry Finn" was Frank F. As this inquirer evidently knew the Hannibal of the forties, he will easily recall Frank. Frank's father was at one time Town Drunkard, an exceedingly well-defined and unofficial office of those days. He succeeded "General" Gaines, and for a time he was sole and only incumbent of the office; but afterward Jimmy Finn proved competency and disputed the place with him,[Pg 692] so we had two town drunkards at one time—and it made as much trouble in that village as Christendom experienced in the fourteenth century when there were two Popes at the same time.
I replied that "Huckleberry Finn" was Frank F. Since this person clearly knew Hannibal in the 1840s, they will easily remember Frank. Frank's dad was once the Town Drunkard, a very clear but unofficial role back then. He took over from "General" Gaines and for a while was the only one holding that position; however, later on, Jimmy Finn showed he was capable and competed with him for the title,[Pg 692] so we had two town drunkards at the same time—and it caused as much trouble in that village as having two Popes did for Christendom in the fourteenth century.
In "Huckleberry Finn" I have drawn Frank exactly as he was. He was ignorant, unwashed, insufficiently fed; but he had as good a heart as ever any boy had. His liberties were totally unrestricted. He was the only really independent person—boy or man—in the community, and by consequence he was tranquilly and continuously happy, and was envied by all the rest of us. We liked him; we enjoyed his society. And as his society was forbidden us by our parents, the prohibition trebled and quadrupled its value, and therefore we sought and got more of his society than of any other boy's. I heard, four years ago, that he was Justice of the Peace in a remote village in the State of ——, and was a good citizen and was greatly respected.
In "Huckleberry Finn," I portrayed Frank just as he was. He was uneducated, unkempt, and poorly fed; but he had a heart as good as any boy’s. He had complete freedom. He was the only truly independent person—boy or man—in the community, which made him calmly and continuously happy, and everyone else envied him. We liked him; we enjoyed being around him. Since our parents forbade us from hanging out with him, that made his company even more valuable, so we sought out and spent more time with him than with any other boy. I heard, four years ago, that he was a Justice of the Peace in a remote village in the State of —— and was a good citizen who was greatly respected.
During Jimmy Finn's term he (Jimmy) was not exclusive; he was not finical; he was not hypercritical; he was largely and handsomely democratic—and slept in the deserted tan-yard with the hogs. My father tried to reform him once, but did not succeed. My father was not a professional reformer. In him the spirit of reform was spasmodic. It only broke out now and then, with considerable intervals between. Once he tried to reform Injun Joe. That also was a failure. It was a failure, and we boys were glad. For Injun Joe, drunk, was interesting and a benefaction to us, but Injun Joe, sober, was a dreary spectacle. We watched my father's experiments upon him with a good deal of anxiety, but it came out all right and we were satisfied. Injun Joe got drunk oftener than before, and became intolerably interesting.
During Jimmy Finn's time, he wasn’t exclusive; he wasn’t picky; he wasn’t overly critical; he was mostly and generously democratic—and he slept in the empty tan-yard with the pigs. My dad tried to reform him once but didn’t succeed. My dad wasn’t a professional reformer. The spirit of reform in him was sporadic. It only showed up now and then, with long breaks in between. Once, he tried to reform Injun Joe. That also failed. It was a failure, and we boys were glad. Because Injun Joe, when he was drunk, was interesting and a blessing to us, but Injun Joe, when he was sober, was a boring sight. We watched my dad’s attempts with a lot of anxiety, but it turned out fine, and we were satisfied. Injun Joe got drunk more often than before and became incredibly interesting.
I think that in "Tom Sawyer" I starved Injun Joe to death in the cave. But that may have been to meet the exigencies of romantic literature. I can't remember now whether the real Injun Joe died in the cave or out of it, but I do remember that the news of his death reached me at a most unhappy time—that is to say, just at bedtime on a summer night when a prodigious storm of thunder and lightning accompanied by a deluging rain that turned the streets and lanes into rivers, caused me to repent and resolve to lead a better life. I can remember those awful thunder-bursts and the white glare of the lightning yet, and the wild lashing of the rain against the window-panes. By[Pg 693] my teachings I perfectly well knew what all that wild riot was for—Satan had come to get Injun Joe. I had no shadow of doubt about it. It was the proper thing when a person like Injun Joe was required in the under world, and I should have thought it strange and unaccountable if Satan had come for him in a less impressive way. With every glare of lightning I shrivelled and shrunk together in mortal terror, and in the interval of black darkness that followed I poured out my lamentings over my lost condition, and my supplications for just one more chance, with an energy and feeling and sincerity quite foreign to my nature.
I think that in "Tom Sawyer," I let Injun Joe starve to death in the cave. But maybe that was just to fit the needs of romantic storytelling. I can't remember if the real Injun Joe died in the cave or outside of it, but I do recall that I heard about his death at a really bad time—that is, right at bedtime on a summer night when a huge storm of thunder and lightning, along with a pouring rain that turned the streets into rivers, made me regret everything and decide to live a better life. I can still remember those awful thunderclaps and the bright flash of lightning, along with the wild rain lashing against the window panes. By[Pg 693] my teachings, I knew exactly what all that chaos was about—Satan had come for Injun Joe. I had no doubt about it. It was only right for someone like Injun Joe to be taken to the underworld, and I would have found it odd and unexplainable if Satan had come for him in a less dramatic way. With every flash of lightning, I curled up in fear, and in the pitch-black moments that followed, I cried out about my lost state and begged for just one more chance, with an energy and sincerity that was totally unlike me.
But in the morning I saw that it was a false alarm and concluded to resume business at the old stand and wait for another reminder.
But in the morning I realized it was a false alarm and decided to get back to business as usual and wait for another reminder.
The axiom says "History repeats itself." A week or two ago Mr. Blank-Blank dined with us. At dinner he mentioned a circumstance which flashed me back over about sixty years and landed me in that little bedroom on that tempestuous night, and brought to my mind how creditable to me was my conduct through the whole night, and how barren it was of moral spot or fleck during that entire period: he said Mr. X was sexton, or something, of the Episcopal church in his town, and had been for many years the competent superintendent of all the church's worldly affairs, and was regarded by the whole congregation as a stay, a blessing, a priceless treasure. But he had a couple of defects—not large defects, but they seemed large when flung against the background of his profoundly religious character: he drank a good deal, and he could outswear a brakeman. A movement arose to persuade him to lay aside these vices, and after consulting with his pal, who occupied the same position as himself in the other Episcopal church, and whose defects were duplicates of his own and had inspired regret in the congregation he was serving, they concluded to try for reform—not wholesale, but half at a time. They took the liquor pledge and waited for results. During nine days the results were entirely satisfactory, and they were recipients of many compliments and much congratulation. Then on New-year's eve they had business a mile and a half out of town, just beyond the State line. Everything went well with them that evening in the barroom of the inn—but at last the celebration of the occasion by[Pg 694] those villagers came to be of a burdensome nature. It was a bitter cold night and the multitudinous hot toddies that were circulating began by and by to exert a powerful influence upon the new prohibitionists. At last X's friend remarked,
The saying goes, "History repeats itself." A week or two ago, Mr. Blank-Blank had dinner with us. During the meal, he brought up a situation that took me back about sixty years, landing me in that small bedroom on that stormy night. It reminded me of how commendable my behavior was throughout that night, completely free of any moral blemishes. He mentioned that Mr. X was the sexton, or something similar, of the Episcopal church in his town. For many years, he had effectively managed all the church's worldly affairs and was seen by the entire congregation as a support, a blessing, a priceless asset. However, he had a couple of flaws—not huge ones, but they felt significant against the backdrop of his deeply religious character: he drank quite a bit and could outswear a brakeman. A movement began to encourage him to give up these vices, and after talking it over with his friend, who held the same position in the other Episcopal church and shared similar flaws that had disappointed his own congregation, they decided to attempt reform—not all at once, but gradually. They took the liquor pledge and waited for results. For nine days, the results were entirely positive, and they received many compliments and congratulations. Then, on New Year's Eve, they had business a mile and a half outside of town, just past the State line. Everything went well for them that evening in the inn's barroom—but eventually, the celebrations by those villagers became too much to handle. It was a bitterly cold night, and the numerous hot toddies being passed around started to have a strong effect on the new prohibitionists. At last, X's friend remarked,
"X, does it occur to you that we are outside the diocese?"
"X, do you realize that we are outside the diocese?"
That ended reform No. 1. Then they took a chance in reform No. 2. For a while that one prospered, and they got much applause. I now reach the incident which sent me back a matter of sixty years, as I have remarked a while ago.
That wrapped up reform No. 1. Then they took a risk with reform No. 2. For some time, that one thrived, and they received a lot of praise. Now I come to the incident that took me back about sixty years, as I mentioned earlier.
One morning Mr. Blank-Blank met X on the street and said,
One morning, Mr. Blank-Blank ran into X on the street and said,
"You have made a gallant struggle against those defects of yours. I am aware that you failed on No. 1, but I am also aware that you are having better luck with No. 2."
"You've put up a brave fight against those flaws of yours. I know you didn't succeed with No. 1, but I also see that you're having more success with No. 2."
"Yes," X said; "No. 2 is all right and sound up to date, and we are full of hope."
"Yes," X said; "No. 2 is good and up to date, and we are very hopeful."
Blank-Blank said, "X, of course you have your troubles like other people, but they never show on the outside. I have never seen you when you were not cheerful. Are you always cheerful? Really always cheerful?"
Blank-Blank said, "X, of course you have your problems like everyone else, but they never show on the outside. I've never seen you when you weren't cheerful. Are you always cheerful? Really always cheerful?"
"Well, no," he said, "no, I can't say that I am always cheerful, but—well, you know that kind of a night that comes: say—you wake up 'way in the night and the whole world is sunk in gloom and there are storms and earthquakes and all sorts of disasters in the air threatening, and you get cold and clammy; and when that happens to me I recognize how sinful I am and it all goes clear to my heart and wrings it and I have such terrors and terrors!—oh, they are indescribable, those terrors that assail me, and I slip out of bed and get on my knees and pray and pray and promise that I will be good, if I can only have another chance. And then, you know, in the morning the sun shines out so lovely, and the birds sing and the whole world is so beautiful, and—b' God, I rally!"
"Well, no," he said, "I can't say I'm always cheerful, but—well, you know that kind of night that comes: like—you wake up in the middle of the night and the whole world is covered in darkness, and there are storms and earthquakes and all kinds of disasters looming, and you feel cold and sweaty; and when that hits me, I realize how wrong I am and it all sinks in deep and twists at my heart and I have such fears and fears!—oh, they are impossible to describe, those fears that hit me, and I get out of bed and kneel down to pray and pray and promise that I'll be good if I can just have another chance. And then, you know, in the morning the sun comes out so beautifully, and the birds sing and the whole world is so gorgeous, and—by God, I bounce back!"
Now I will quote a brief paragraph from this letter which I have a minute ago spoken of. The writer says:
Now I will quote a short paragraph from the letter I just mentioned. The writer says:
You no doubt are at a loss to know who I am. I will tell you. In my younger days I was a resident of Hannibal, Mo., and you and I were schoolmates attending Mr. Dawson's school along with Sam and Will Bowen and Andy Fuqua and others whose names I have forgotten. I was then about the smallest boy in school, for my age, and they called me little Aleck for short.
You’re probably curious about who I am. Let me clarify. When I was younger, I lived in Hannibal, Missouri, and we were classmates at Mr. Dawson's school along with Sam and Will Bowen and Andy Fuqua, among others whose names I can’t remember. At that time, I was one of the smallest boys in my age group, and they referred to me as little Aleck for short.
I only dimly remember him, but I knew those other people as well as I knew the town drunkards. I remember Dawson's schoolhouse perfectly. If I wanted to describe it I could save myself the trouble by conveying the description of it to these pages from "Tom Sawyer." I can remember the drowsy and inviting summer sounds that used to float in through the open windows from that distant boy-Paradise, Cardiff Hill (Holliday's Hill), and mingle with the murmurs of the studying pupils and make them the more dreary by the contrast. I remember Andy Fuqua, the oldest pupil—a man of twenty-five. I remember the youngest pupil, Nannie Owsley, a child of seven. I remember George Robards, eighteen or twenty years old, the only pupil who studied Latin. I remember—in some cases vividly, in others vaguely—the rest of the twenty-five boys and girls. I remember Mr. Dawson very well. I remember his boy, Theodore, who was as good as he could be. In fact, he was inordinately good, extravagantly good, offensively good, detestably good—and he had pop-eyes—and I would have drowned him if I had had a chance. In that school we were all about on an equality, and, so far as I remember, the passion of envy had no place in our hearts, except in the case of Arch Fuqua—the other one's brother. Of course we all went barefoot in the summer-time. Arch Fuqua was about my own age—ten or eleven. In the winter we could stand him, because he wore shoes then, and his great gift was hidden from our sight and we were enabled to forget it. But in the summer-time he was a bitterness to us. He was our envy, for he could double back his big toe and let it fly and you could hear it snap thirty yards. There was not another boy in the school that could approach this feat. He had not a rival as regards a physical distinction—except in Theodore Eddy, who could work his ears like a horse. But he was no real rival, because you couldn't hear him work his ears; so all the advantage lay with Arch Fuqua.
I only vaguely remember him, but I knew those other people just as well as I knew the town drunks. I remember Dawson's schoolhouse perfectly. If I wanted to describe it, I could save myself the trouble by quoting "Tom Sawyer." I can recall the lazy, inviting summer sounds that drifted in through the open windows from that distant boy's paradise, Cardiff Hill (Holliday's Hill), mixing with the whispers of the studying students and making them even drearier by contrast. I remember Andy Fuqua, the oldest student—a twenty-five-year-old man. I remember the youngest student, Nannie Owsley, who was seven. I recall George Robards, around eighteen or twenty, the only student who studied Latin. I remember—in some cases clearly, in others vaguely—the rest of the twenty-five boys and girls. I remember Mr. Dawson very well. I remember his son, Theodore, who was as good as he could be. In fact, he was excessively good, annoyingly good, intolerably good—and he had pop-eyes—and I would have drowned him if I had the chance. In that school, we were all pretty much equal, and as far as I remember, jealousy was absent from our hearts, except in the case of Arch Fuqua—the other Fuqua's brother. Of course, we all went barefoot in the summer. Arch Fuqua was about my age—ten or eleven. In the winter, we could tolerate him because he wore shoes then, hiding his great talent from our sight, allowing us to forget it. But in the summer, he was a source of bitterness for us. He was our envy because he could bend his big toe back and let it snap, and you could hear it thirty yards away. No other boy in the school could come close to this feat. He had no rival for this physical talent—except for Theodore Eddy, who could wiggle his ears like a horse. But he wasn’t a true rival, because you couldn’t hear him wiggle his ears; so all the advantage lay with Arch Fuqua.
I am not done with Dawson's school; I will return to it in a later chapter.
I’m not finished with Dawson's school; I’ll get back to it in a later chapter.
[Dictated at Hamilton, Bermuda, January 6, 1907.] "That reminds me." In conversation we are always using that phrase, and seldom or never noticing how large a significance it bears. It stands for a curious and interesting fact, to wit: that sleeping or waking, dreaming or talking, the thoughts which swarm[Pg 696] through our heads are almost constantly, almost continuously, accompanied by a like swarm of reminders of incidents and episodes of our past. A man can never know what a large traffic this commerce of association carries on in our minds until he sets out to write his autobiography; he then finds that a thought is seldom born to him that does not immediately remind him of some event, large or small, in his past experience. Quite naturally these remarks remind me of various things, among others this: that sometimes a thought, by the power of association, will bring back to your mind a lost word or a lost name which you have not been able to recover by any other process known to your mental equipment. Yesterday we had an instance of this. Rev. Joseph H. Twichell is with me on this flying trip to Bermuda. He was with me on my last visit to Bermuda, and to-day we were trying to remember when it was. We thought it was somewhere in the neighborhood of thirty years ago, but that was as near as we could get at the date. Twichell said that the landlady in whose boarding-house we sojourned in that ancient time could doubtless furnish us the date, and we must look her up. We wanted to see her, anyway, because she and her blooming daughter of eighteen were the only persons whose acquaintance we had made at that time, for we were travelling under fictitious names, and people who wear aliases are not given to seeking society and bringing themselves under suspicion. But at this point in our talk we encountered an obstruction: we could not recall the landlady's name. We hunted all around through our minds for that name, using all the customary methods of research, but without success; the name was gone from us, apparently permanently. We finally gave the matter up, and fell to talking about something else. The talk wandered from one subject to another, and finally arrived at Twichell's school-days in Hartford—the Hartford of something more than half a century ago—and he mentioned several of his schoolmasters, dwelling with special interest upon the peculiarities of an aged one named Olney. He remarked that Olney, humble village schoolmaster as he was, was yet a man of superior parts, and had published text-books which had enjoyed a wide currency in America in their day. I said I remembered those books, and had studied Olney's Geography in school when I was a boy. Then Twichell said,
[i]Dictated at Hamilton, Bermuda, January 6, 1907.[/i] "That reminds me." We often use that phrase in conversation without realizing how much meaning it carries. It points to a curious and interesting fact: whether we’re sleeping or awake, dreaming or talking, our minds are almost constantly filled with a flood of reminders of past events and experiences. A person can’t fully grasp the extent of this mental traffic of associations until they try to write their autobiography; they then discover that every thought they have usually triggers a memory of some event, big or small, from their past. Naturally, these comments lead me to various thoughts, including this one: sometimes a thought can trigger a memory of a lost word or name that you can't retrieve through any other method your mind has. Yesterday, we experienced this. Rev. Joseph H. Twichell is traveling with me on this quick trip to Bermuda. He was with me on my last visit to Bermuda, and today we were trying to remember when that was. We thought it was about thirty years ago, but that was as close as we could get to the exact date. Twichell suggested that the landlady of the boarding house we stayed at back then could probably tell us the date, and we should look her up. We wanted to see her anyway because she and her lively eighteen-year-old daughter were the only people we had met back then, since we were traveling under fake names, and people with aliases tend not to seek out social interactions or draw attention to themselves. But at this point in our conversation, we hit a roadblock: we couldn't remember the landlady's name. We searched our minds for that name, using all our usual techniques, but without luck; it seemed to be gone from our memories, possibly for good. We eventually gave up and started talking about something else. The conversation moved from topic to topic and eventually landed on Twichell's school days in Hartford—the Hartford of more than fifty years ago—and he recalled several of his teachers, focusing particularly on the quirks of an elderly one named Olney. He noted that although Olney was a humble village schoolmaster, he was a man of great talent and had published textbooks that were quite popular in America during their time. I mentioned that I remembered those books and that I had studied Olney's Geography in school when I was a boy. Then Twichell said,
[Pg 697]"That reminds me—our landlady's name was a name that was associated with school-books of some kind or other fifty or sixty years ago. I wonder what it was. I believe it began with K."
[Pg 697]"That reminds me—our landlady's name was one that used to be linked to school books from fifty or sixty years ago. I wonder what it was. I think it started with a K."
Association did the rest, and did it instantly. I said,
Association did the rest, and did it instantly. I said,
"Kirkham's Grammar!"
"Kirkham's Grammar!"
That settled it. Kirkham was the name; and we went out to seek for the owner of it. There was no trouble about that, for Bermuda is not large, and is like the earlier Garden of Eden, in that everybody in it knows everybody else, just as it was in the serpent's headquarters in Adam's time. We easily found Miss Kirkham—she that had been the blooming girl of a generation before—and she was still keeping boarders; but her mother had passed from this life. She settled the date for us, and did it with certainty, by help of a couple of uncommon circumstances, events of that ancient time. She said we had sailed from Bermuda on the 24th of May, 1877, which was the day on which her only nephew was born—and he is now thirty years of age. The other unusual circumstance—she called it an unusual circumstance, and I didn't say anything—was that on that day the Rev. Mr. Twichell (bearing the assumed name of Peters) had made a statement to her which she regarded as a fiction. I remembered the circumstance very well. We had bidden the young girl good-by and had gone fifty yards, perhaps, when Twichell said he had forgotten something (I doubted it) and must go back. When he rejoined me he was silent, and this alarmed me, because I had not seen an example of it before. He seemed quite uncomfortable, and I asked him what the trouble was. He said he had been inspired to give the girl a pleasant surprise, and so had gone back and said to her—
That settled it. Kirkham was the name, and we went out to find its owner. There was no trouble with that, since Bermuda isn’t very big, and it's like the original Garden of Eden—everyone knows everyone else, just like it was back in Adam's day. We quickly found Miss Kirkham—she who had once been the vibrant girl of a generation ago—and she was still renting out rooms; but her mother had passed away. She confirmed the date for us without a doubt, thanks to a couple of unusual events from that time. She told us we had sailed from Bermuda on May 24, 1877, which was the day her only nephew was born—and he is now thirty years old. The other unusual event—she referred to it as unusual, and I didn’t argue—was that on that day, Rev. Mr. Twichell (using the name Peters) had made a statement to her that she considered a fabrication. I remembered that incident very well. We had said goodbye to the young girl and had walked about fifty yards when Twichell said he had forgotten something (I was skeptical) and needed to go back. When he caught up with me again, he was silent, which worried me because I hadn’t seen him like that before. He seemed pretty uncomfortable, and I asked him what was wrong. He said he felt inspired to give the girl a nice surprise, so he had gone back and told her—
"That young fellow's name is not Wilkinson—that's Mark Twain."
"That young guy's name isn't Wilkinson—that's Mark Twain."
She did not lose her mind; she did not exhibit any excitement at all, but said quite simply, quite tranquilly,
She didn't lose her mind; she didn't show any excitement at all, but just said very simply, very calmly,
"Tell it to the marines, Mr. Peters—if that should happen to be your name."
"Go tell that to the marines, Mr. Peters—if that happens to be your name."
It was very pleasant to meet her again. We were white-headed, but she was not; in the sweet and unvexed spiritual atmosphere of the Bermudas one does not achieve gray hairs at forty-eight.
It was really nice to see her again. We had gray hair, but she didn’t; in the lovely and peaceful vibe of the Bermudas, you don’t get gray hairs at forty-eight.
[Pg 698]I had a dream last night, and of course it was born of association, like nearly everything else that drifts into a person's head, asleep or awake. On board ship, on the passage down, Twichell was talking about the swiftly developing possibilities of aerial navigation, and he quoted those striking verses of Tennyson's which forecast a future when air-borne vessels of war shall meet and fight above the clouds and redden the earth below with a rain of blood. This picture of carnage and blood and death reminded me of something which I had read a fortnight ago—statistics of railway accidents compiled by the United States Government, wherein the appalling fact was set forth that on our 200,000 miles of railway we annually kill 10,000 persons outright and injure 80,000. The war-ships in the air suggested the railway horrors, and three nights afterward the railway horrors suggested my dream. The work of association was going on in my head, unconsciously, all that time. It was an admirable dream, what there was of it.
[Pg 698]I had a dream last night, and of course it was the result of associations, like almost everything else that pops into someone's mind, whether they're asleep or awake. While we were on the ship during the journey down, Twichell was discussing the rapidly evolving possibilities of flying, and he quoted those memorable lines from Tennyson that predict a future where airships battle above the clouds and rain down destruction on the earth below. This image of violence and death reminded me of something I had read two weeks ago—statistics on train accidents compiled by the United States Government, which revealed the shocking fact that on our 200,000 miles of railroad, we kill 10,000 people outright and injure 80,000 every year. The idea of warships in the sky brought to mind the railway tragedies, and three nights later, those railway tragedies inspired my dream. The process of making connections was happening in my mind, unconsciously, all along. It was a remarkable dream, at least what I remember of it.
In it I saw a funeral procession; I saw it from a mountain peak; I saw it crawling along and curving here and there, serpentlike, through a level vast plain. I seemed to see a hundred miles of the procession, but neither the beginning of it nor the end of it was within the limits of my vision. The procession was in ten divisions, each division marked by a sombre flag, and the whole represented ten years of our railway activities in the accident line; each division was composed of 80,000 cripples, and was bearing its own year's 10,000 mutilated corpses to the grave: in the aggregate 800,000 cripples and 100,000 dead, drenched in blood!
In it, I saw a funeral procession; I viewed it from a mountain peak; I watched it crawling along and winding here and there, like a serpent, across a vast flat plain. It felt like I could see the procession stretching for a hundred miles, but neither the start nor the end was within my line of sight. The procession was divided into ten sections, each marked by a dark flag, representing ten years of our railway activities related to accidents; each section consisted of 80,000 injured individuals and was carrying its own year's 10,000 mutilated bodies to the grave: in total, there were 800,000 injured and 100,000 dead, soaked in blood!
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
To be continued.
FOOTNOTE:
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated, October 10, 1906.] Susy has named a number of the friends who were assembled at Onteora at the time of our visit, but there were others—among them Laurence Hutton, Charles Dudley Warner, and Carroll Beckwith, and their wives. It was a bright and jolly company. Some of those choice spirits are still with us; the others have passed from this life: Mrs. Clemens, Susy, Mr. Warner, Mary Mapes Dodge, Laurence Hutton, Dean Sage—peace to their ashes! Susy is in error in thinking Mrs. Dodge was not there at that time; we were her guests.
[i]Dictated, October 10, 1906.[/i] Susy mentioned several friends who were gathered at Onteora when we visited, but there were more—like Laurence Hutton, Charles Dudley Warner, Carroll Beckwith, and their wives. It was a lively and cheerful group. Some of those wonderful people are still with us; others have passed away: Mrs. Clemens, Susy, Mr. Warner, Mary Mapes Dodge, Laurence Hutton, Dean Sage—may they rest in peace! Susy is mistaken in thinking that Mrs. Dodge wasn’t there at that time; we were staying with her.
We arrived at nightfall, dreary from a tiresome journey; but the dreariness did not last. Mrs. Dodge had provided a home-made banquet, and the happy company sat down to it, twenty strong, or more. Then the thing happened which always happens at large dinners, and is always exasperating: everybody talked to his elbow-mates and all talked at once, and gradually raised their voices higher, and higher, and higher, in the desperate effort to be heard. It was like a riot, an insurrection; it was an intolerable volume of noise. Presently I said to the lady next me—
We arrived at nightfall, worn out from a long journey; but the gloom didn’t last. Mrs. Dodge had prepared a home-cooked feast, and the cheerful group sat down to enjoy it, twenty or more in total. Then came the familiar chaos that always seems to happen at big dinners: everyone chatted with their neighbors, all at the same time, and gradually increased their voices higher and higher in a frantic attempt to be heard. It felt like a riot, an insurrection; the noise was unbearable. Soon, I turned to the lady next to me—
"I will subdue this riot, I will silence this racket. There is[Pg 9] only one way to do it, but I know the art. You must tilt your head toward mine and seem to be deeply interested in what I am saying; I will talk in a low voice; then, just because our neighbors won't be able to hear me, they will want to hear me. If I mumble long enough—say two minutes—you will see that the dialogues will one after another come to a standstill, and there will be silence, not a sound anywhere but my mumbling."
"I will put an end to this chaos, I will quiet this noise. There is[Pg 9] only one way to do it, but I know how. You need to lean in and look genuinely interested in what I'm saying; I will speak softly; then, just because our neighbors can't hear me, they'll want to listen. If I mumble for long enough—about two minutes—you'll see that conversations will gradually stop, and there will be silence, not a sound around except for my mumbling."
Then in a very low voice I began:
Then in a very quiet voice, I started:
"When I went out to Chicago, eleven years ago, to witness the Grant festivities, there was a great banquet on the first night, with six hundred ex-soldiers present. The gentleman who sat next me was Mr. X. X. He was very hard of hearing, and he had a habit common to deaf people of shouting his remarks instead of delivering them in an ordinary voice. He would handle his knife and fork in reflective silence for five or six minutes at a time and then suddenly fetch out a shout that would make you jump out of the United States."
"When I went to Chicago eleven years ago to see the Grant celebrations, there was a big banquet on the first night with six hundred ex-soldiers present. The guy sitting next to me was Mr. X. X. He was really hard of hearing and had that habit that many deaf people do of yelling his comments instead of speaking normally. He would quietly use his knife and fork for five or six minutes and then suddenly shout something that would make you jump out of your seat."
By this time the insurrection at Mrs. Dodge's table—at least that part of it in my immediate neighborhood—had died down, and the silence was spreading, couple by couple, down the long table. I went on in a lower and still lower mumble, and most impressively—
By this point, the uproar at Mrs. Dodge's table—at least the part near me—had quieted down, and the silence was spreading, couple by couple, down the long table. I continued speaking in a lower and lower mumble, and most impressively—
"During one of Mr. X. X.'s mute intervals, a man opposite us approached the end of a story which he had been telling his elbow-neighbor. He was speaking in a low voice—there was much noise—I was deeply interested, and straining my ears to catch his words, stretching my neck, holding my breath, to hear, unconscious of everything but the fascinating tale. I heard him say, 'At this point he seized her by her long hair—she shrieking and begging—bent her neck across his knee, and with one awful sweep of the razor—'
"During one of Mr. X. X.'s quiet moments, a guy across from us was reaching the end of a story he’d been telling to the person next to him. He was speaking softly since it was pretty noisy—I was really curious and leaning in to catch his words, stretching my neck, holding my breath, completely focused on the captivating tale. I heard him say, 'At this moment he grabbed her by her long hair—she was screaming and pleading—bent her neck over his knee, and with one terrible swipe of the razor—'
"HOW DO YOU LIKE CHICA-A-AGO?!!!"
"How do you like Chicago?!!!"
That was X. X.'s interruption, hearable at thirty miles. By the time I had reached that place in my mumblings Mrs. Dodge's dining-room was so silent, so breathlessly still, that if you had dropped a thought anywhere in it you could have heard it smack the floor.[18] When I delivered that yell the entire dinner company jumped as one person, and punched their heads through the ceiling, damaging it, for it was only lath and plaster, and it all[Pg 10] came down on us, and much of it went into the victuals and made them gritty, but no one was hurt. Then I explained why it was that I had played that game, and begged them to take the moral of it home to their hearts and be rational and merciful thenceforth, and cease from screaming in mass, and agree to let one person talk at a time and the rest listen in grateful and unvexed peace. They granted my prayer, and we had a happy time all the rest of the evening; I do not think I have ever had a better time in my life. This was largely because the new terms enabled me to keep the floor—now that I had it—and do all the talking myself. I do like to hear myself talk. Susy has exposed this in her Biography of me.
That was X. X.'s interruption, audible from thirty miles away. By the time I reached that point in my ramblings, Mrs. Dodge's dining room was so quiet, so breathlessly still, that if you had dropped a thought anywhere in the room, you could have heard it hit the floor. [18] When I let out that yell, everyone at the dinner table jumped in unison and their heads shot up, damaging the ceiling, which was just lath and plaster, and it all[Pg 10] came down on us, some of it landing in the food and making it gritty, but thankfully, no one was hurt. Then I explained why I had played that game, urging them to take the lesson to heart and to be rational and kind from then on, to stop screaming all at once, and to agree to let one person speak at a time while the others listened in grateful and calm silence. They agreed to my request, and we had a wonderful time for the rest of the evening; I don't think I've ever enjoyed myself more. This was mainly because the new rules allowed me to keep the spotlight—now that I had it—and do all the talking myself. I really enjoy hearing myself talk. Susy has pointed this out in her Biography of me.
Dean Sage was a delightful man, yet in one way a terror to his friends, for he loved them so well that he could not refrain from playing practical jokes on them. We have to be pretty deeply in love with a person before we can do him the honor of joking familiarly with him. Dean Sage was the best citizen I have known in America. It takes courage to be a good citizen, and he had plenty of it. He allowed no individual and no corporation to infringe his smallest right and escape unpunished. He was very rich, and very generous, and benevolent, and he gave away his money with a prodigal hand; but if an individual or corporation infringed a right of his, to the value of ten cents, he would spend thousands of dollars' worth of time and labor and money and persistence on the matter, and would not lower his flag until he had won his battle or lost it.
Dean Sage was a wonderful guy, but in one way, he was a terror to his friends because he cared about them so much that he couldn't help but pull practical jokes on them. You have to really be in love with someone to joke around with them like that. Dean Sage was the best citizen I've ever known in America. It takes guts to be a good citizen, and he had more than enough. He wouldn't let any individual or corporation violate even his smallest rights without facing consequences. He was very wealthy, incredibly generous, and kind, giving away his money freely. However, if someone or a company infringed on one of his rights, even if it was just worth ten cents, he would invest thousands of dollars' worth of time, effort, and determination into the issue, and he wouldn’t back down until he had either won his battle or lost it.
He and Rev. Mr. Harris had been classmates in college, and to the day of Sage's death they were as fond of each other as an engaged pair. It follows, without saying, that whenever Sage found an opportunity to play a joke upon Harris, Harris was sure to suffer.
He and Rev. Mr. Harris had been college classmates, and right up until Sage's death, they were as close as an engaged couple. So, it's no surprise that whenever Sage had the chance to prank Harris, Harris always ended up being the one to suffer.
Along about 1873 Sage fell a victim to an illness which reduced him to a skeleton, and defied all the efforts of the physicians to cure it. He went to the Adirondacks and took Harris with him. Sage had always been an active man, and he couldn't idle any day wholly away in inanition, but walked every day to the limit of his strength. One day, toward nightfall, the pair came upon a humble log cabin which bore these words painted upon a shingle: "Entertainment for Man and Beast." They were obliged to stop there for the night, Sage's strength being ex[Pg 11]hausted. They entered the cabin and found its owner and sole occupant there, a rugged and sturdy and simple-hearted man of middle age. He cooked supper and placed it before the travellers—salt junk, boiled beans, corn bread and black coffee. Sage's stomach could abide nothing but the most delicate food, therefore this banquet revolted him, and he sat at the table unemployed, while Harris fed ravenously, limitlessly, gratefully; for he had been chaplain in a fighting regiment all through the war, and had kept in perfection the grand and uncritical appetite and splendid physical vigor which those four years of tough fare and activity had furnished him. Sage went supperless to bed, and tossed and writhed all night upon a shuck mattress that was full of attentive and interested corn-cobs. In the morning Harris was ravenous again, and devoured the odious breakfast as contentedly and as delightedly as he had devoured its twin the night before. Sage sat upon the porch, empty, and contemplated the performance and meditated revenge. Presently he beckoned to the landlord and took him aside and had a confidential talk with him. He said,
Around 1873, Sage fell ill and became so weak he looked like a skeleton, and nothing the doctors tried could heal him. He went to the Adirondacks and brought Harris along. Sage had always been an active guy, and he couldn't just waste away the days doing nothing, so he walked every day as much as he could. One evening, they stumbled upon a simple log cabin that had “Entertainment for Man and Beast” painted on a shingle. They had to stop for the night, as Sage was too exhausted to go any further. They entered the cabin and met its owner, a tough, sturdy, and straightforward middle-aged man. He cooked dinner and served it to the travelers—salted meat, boiled beans, cornbread, and black coffee. Sage could only eat the finest food, so he found this meal disgusting and sat at the table not eating, while Harris dug in hungrily and gratefully; he had been a chaplain in a fighting regiment during the war, which had given him a hearty appetite and great physical fitness after four years of rough food and hard work. Sage went to bed without dinner, tossing and turning all night on a straw mattress filled with corn cobs. In the morning, Harris was hungry again and happily ate the awful breakfast just as he had devoured dinner the night before. Sage sat on the porch feeling empty and considered how to get back at them. Soon, he signaled the landlord, pulled him aside, and had a private conversation with him. He said,
"I am the paymaster. What is the bill?"
"I’m the one handling the payments. What’s the total?"
"Two suppers, fifty cents; two beds, thirty cents; two breakfasts, fifty cents—total, a dollar and thirty cents."
"Two dinners, fifty cents; two beds, thirty cents; two breakfasts, fifty cents—total, one dollar and thirty cents."
Sage said, "Go back and make out the bill and fetch it to me here on the porch. Make it thirteen dollars."
Sage said, "Go back and write up the bill and bring it to me here on the porch. Make it thirteen dollars."
"Thirteen dollars! Why, it's impossible! I am no robber. I am charging you what I charge everybody. It's a dollar and thirty cents, and that's all it is."
"Thirteen dollars! That's outrageous! I'm not a thief. I'm charging you exactly what I charge everyone else. It's a dollar and thirty cents, and that's it."
"My man, I've got something to say about this as well as you. It's thirteen dollars. You'll make out your bill for that, and you'll take it, too, or you'll not get a cent."
"My guy, I have something to say about this just like you do. It's thirteen dollars. You'll settle your bill for that, and you'll accept it, too, or you won't get a dime."
The man was troubled, and said, "I don't understand this. I can't make it out."
The man was upset and said, "I don't get this. I can't figure it out."
"Well, I understand it. I know what I am about. It's thirteen dollars, and I want the bill made out for that. There's no other terms. Get it ready and bring it out here. I will examine it and be outraged. You understand? I will dispute the bill. You must stand to it. You must refuse to take less. I will begin to lose my temper; you must begin to lose yours. I will call you hard names; you must answer with harder ones. I will raise my voice; you must raise yours. You must go into a rage—foam[Pg 12] at the mouth, if you can; insert some soap to help it along. Now go along and follow your instructions."
"Alright, I get it. I know what I’m talking about. It’s thirteen dollars, and I want the bill for that amount. There are no other conditions. Get it ready and bring it over here. I'll look it over and act shocked. You understand? I’m going to argue about the bill. You have to hold your ground. You can’t accept less. I’ll start getting angry; you should get angry too. I’ll throw insults; you should throw back even worse ones. I’ll raise my voice; you need to raise yours. You have to go all out—really lose it, if you can; maybe even add some soap to make it more dramatic. Now go on and follow through with what I said."
The man played his assigned part, and played it well. He brought the bill and stood waiting for results. Sage's face began to cloud up, his eyes to snap, and his nostrils to inflate like a horse's; then he broke out with—
The man performed his role, and he did it well. He brought the bill and stood waiting for the outcome. Sage's expression started to darken, his eyes flashed, and his nostrils flared like a horse's; then he burst out with—
"Thirteen dollars! You mean to say that you charge thirteen dollars for these damned inhuman hospitalities of yours? Are you a professional buccaneer? Is it your custom to—"
"Thirteen dollars! Are you really charging thirteen dollars for these awful hospital stays? Are you a professional pirate? Is it your thing to—"
The man burst in with spirit: "Now, I don't want any more out of you—that's a plenty. The bill is thirteen dollars and you'll pay it—that's all; a couple of characterless adventurers bilking their way through this country and attempting to dictate terms to a gentleman! a gentleman who received you supposing you were gentlemen yourselves, whereas in my opinion hell's full of—"
The man stormed in with energy: "Now, I don’t want to hear another word from you—that’s enough. The bill is thirteen dollars and you’ll pay it—that’s all; a couple of spineless frauds scamming their way through this country and trying to call the shots with a gentleman! A gentleman who welcomed you thinking you were decent people, while in my view, hell’s full of—"
Sage broke in—
Sage interrupted—
"Not another word of that!—I won't have it. I regard you as the lowest-down thief that ever—"
"Not another word about that! I won't put up with it. I see you as the biggest low-life thief that ever—"
"Don't you use that word again! By ——, I'll take you by the neck and—"
"Don't you ever use that word again! I swear, I'll grab you by the neck and—"
Harris came rushing out, and just as the two were about to grapple he pushed himself between them and began to implore—
Harris rushed out, and just as the two were about to fight, he pushed himself between them and started to plead—
"Oh, Dean, don't, don't—now, Mr. Smith, control yourself! Oh, think of your family, Dean!—think what a scandal—"
"Oh, Dean, please, please—now, Mr. Smith, calm down! Oh, consider your family, Dean!—think about the scandal—"
But they burst out with maledictions, imprecations and all the hard names they could dig out of the rich accumulations of their educated memories, and in the midst of it the man shouted—
But they erupted with curses, insults, and all the harsh names they could pull from the wealth of their educated memories, and in the middle of it, the man shouted—
"When gentlemen come to this house, I treat them as gentlemen. When people come to this house with the ordinary appetites of gentlemen, I charge them a dollar and thirty cents for what I furnished you; but when a man brings a hell-fired Famine here that gorges a barrel of pork and four barrels of beans at two sittings—"
"When gentlemen come to this house, I treat them like gentlemen. When people come to this house with the usual desires of gentlemen, I charge them a dollar and thirty cents for what I provided you; but when a man brings a starving crowd here that devours a barrel of pork and four barrels of beans in two sittings—"
Sage broke in, in a voice that was eloquent with remorse and self-reproach, "I never thought of that, and I ask your pardon; I am ashamed of myself and of my friend. Here's your thirteen dollars, and my apologies along with it."
Sage interrupted, speaking with a tone full of regret and self-blame, "I never considered that, and I'm sorry; I'm embarrassed by myself and my friend. Here’s your thirteen dollars, plus my apologies."
[Dictated March 12, 1906.] I have always taken a great in[Pg 13]terest in other people's duels. One always feels an abiding interest in any heroic thing which has entered into his own experience.
[Dictated March 12, 1906.] I've always been really interested in other people's duels. There's a lasting fascination with anything heroic that has become part of one's own experience.
In 1878, fourteen years after my unmaterialized duel, Messieurs Fortu and Gambetta fought a duel which made heroes of both of them in France, but made them rather ridiculous throughout the rest of the world. I was living in Munich that fall and winter, and I was so interested in that funny tragedy that I wrote a long account of it, and it is in one of my books, somewhere—an account which had some inaccuracies in it, but as an exhibition of the spirit of that duel, I think it was correct and trustworthy. And when I was living in Vienna, thirty-four years after my ineffectual duel, my interest in that kind of incident was still strong; and I find here among my Autobiographical manuscripts of that day a chapter which I began concerning it, but did not finish. I wanted to finish it, but held it open in the hope that the Italian ambassador, M. Nigra, would find time to furnish me the full history of Señor Cavalotti's adventures in that line. But he was a busy man; there was always an interruption before he could get well started; so my hope was never fulfilled. The following is the unfinished chapter:
In 1878, fourteen years after my unfulfilled duel, Messieurs Fortu and Gambetta engaged in a duel that turned both of them into heroes in France, but made them quite laughable everywhere else. I was living in Munich that fall and winter, and I was so intrigued by that strange tragedy that I wrote a lengthy account of it, which is included in one of my books, somewhere—an account that had some inaccuracies, but as a reflection of the spirit of that duel, I believe it was accurate and reliable. Even when I was living in Vienna, thirty-four years after my pointless duel, my fascination with such incidents remained strong; and I have here among my autobiographical manuscripts from that time a chapter I started about it but never finished. I wanted to complete it, but kept it open in the hope that the Italian ambassador, M. Nigra, would eventually find the time to provide me the full story of Señor Cavalotti's escapades in that regard. However, he was always busy; there were always interruptions before he could really dive in; so my hopes were never realized. The following is the unfinished chapter:
(1898.)As concerns duelling. This pastime is as common in Austria to-day as it is in France. But with this difference, that here in the Austrian States the duel is dangerous, while in France it is not. Here it is tragedy, in France it in comedy; here it is a solemnity, there it is monkey-shines; here the duellist risks his life, there he does not even risk his shirt. Here he fights with pistol or sabre, in France with a hairpin—a blunt one. Here the desperately wounded man tries to walk to the hospital; there they paint the scratch so that they can find it again, lay the sufferer on a stretcher, and conduct him off the field with a band of music.
Dueling is just as common in Austria now as it is in France. But there’s a major difference: in Austria, duels are dangerous, while in France, they aren’t. Here, it’s a tragedy; in France, it’s a joke. In Austria, duelists face life-threatening danger; in France, they don’t even risk damaging their clothes. We fight with guns or swords here; in France, they might as well use a dull hairpin. Here, a seriously injured person hobbles to the hospital; there, they just note the scratch for later, lay the injured person on a stretcher, and carry them off the field with music playing.
At the end of a French duel the pair hug and kiss and cry, and praise each other's valor; then the surgeons make an examination and pick out the scratched one, and the other one helps him on to the litter and pays his fare; and in return the scratched one treats to champagne and oysters in the evening, and then "the incident is closed," as the French say. It is all polite, and gracious, and pretty, and impressive. At the end of an Austrian duel the antagonist that is alive gravely offers his hand to the other man, utters some phrases of courteous regret, then bids him good-by and goes his way, and that incident also is closed. The French duellist is painstakingly protected from danger, by the rules of the game. His antagonist's weapon cannot reach so far as his body; if he get a scratch it will not be above his elbow. But in Austria the[Pg 14] rules of the game do not provide against danger, they carefully provide for it, usually. Commonly the combat must be kept up until one of the men is disabled; a non-disabling slash or stab does not retire him.
At the end of a French duel, the two combatants embrace, kiss, cry, and commend each other’s bravery. Then the surgeons check the wounded one and help him onto a stretcher, while the other pays for his transport. In return, the injured fighter treats him to champagne and oysters later, and then “the incident is closed,” as the French say. It’s all polite, gracious, beautiful, and impressive. At the end of an Austrian duel, the surviving opponent solemnly shakes the other man’s hand, expresses some courteous regret, says goodbye, and moves on—also closing that incident. The French duelist is carefully shielded from danger by the duel’s rules. His opponent's weapon can’t harm him beyond a certain distance; if he gets a scratch, it won’t be above his elbow. But in Austria, the rules of the duel don’t protect against danger; they usually accommodate it. Typically, the fight must continue until one man is incapacitated; a non-disabling slash or stab doesn’t end it.
For a matter of three months I watched the Viennese journals, and whenever a duel was reported in their telegraphic columns I scrap-booked it. By this record I find that duelling in Austria is not confined to journalists and old maids, as in France, but is indulged in by military men, journalists, students, physicians, lawyers, members of the legislature, and even the Cabinet, the Bench and the police. Duelling is forbidden by law; and so it seems odd to see the makers and administrators of the laws dancing on their work in this way. Some months ago Count Bodeni, at that time Chief of the Government, fought a pistol-duel here in the capital city of the Empire with representative Wolf, and both of those distinguished Christians came near getting turned out of the Church—for the Church as well as the State forbids duelling.
For three months, I monitored the Viennese newspapers, and whenever they reported on a duel in their headlines, I saved it. From this collection, I found that dueling in Austria involves not just journalists and old maids like in France; it also includes military personnel, journalists, students, doctors, lawyers, lawmakers, and even members of the Cabinet, judiciary, and police. Dueling is illegal, so it seems odd to see the people who make and enforce the laws behaving this way. A few months ago, Count Bodeni, who was the Chief of the Government at the time, fought a pistol duel in the capital with representative Wolf, and both of these notable gentlemen nearly faced punishment from the Church—since both the Church and the State prohibit dueling.
In one case, lately, in Hungary, the police interfered and stopped a duel after the first innings. This was a sabre-duel between the chief of police and the city attorney. Unkind things were said about it by the newspapers. They said the police remembered their duty uncommonly well when their own officials were the parties concerned in duels. But I think the underlings showed good bread-and-butter judgment. If their superiors had carved each other well, the public would have asked, Where were the police? and their places would have been endangered; but custom does not require them to be around where mere unofficial citizens are explaining a thing with sabres.
Recently in Hungary, the police intervened and stopped a duel after the first round. This was a saber duel between the police chief and the city attorney. The newspapers harshly criticized it, saying the police suddenly remembered their duty when it involved their own officials. However, I believe the officers showed good judgment. If their superiors had seriously injured each other, the public would have asked, “Where were the police?” and their jobs would have been at risk; but they aren’t expected to be present when ordinary citizens are settling things with sabers.
There was another duel—a double duel—going on in the immediate neighborhood at the time, and in this case the police obeyed custom and did not disturb it. Their bread and butter was not at stake there. In this duel a physician fought a couple of surgeons, and wounded both—one of them lightly, the other seriously. An undertaker wanted to keep people from interfering, but that was quite natural again.
At that time, there was another duel—a double duel—happening nearby, and in this case, the police followed their usual practice and didn’t intervene. Their jobs weren’t at stake there. In this duel, a doctor faced off against two surgeons, injuring both—one slightly, the other severely. A funeral director tried to prevent people from getting involved, but that was quite understandable.
Selecting at random from my record, I next find a duel at Tarnopol between military men. An officer of the Tenth Dragoons charged an officer of the Ninth Dragoons with an offence against the laws of the card-table. There was a defect or a doubt somewhere in the matter, and this had to be examined and passed upon by a Court of Honor. So the case was sent up to Lemberg for this purpose. One would like to know what the defect was, but the newspaper does not say. A man here who has fought many duels and has a graveyard, says that probably the matter in question was as to whether the accusation was true or not; that if the charge was a very grave one—cheating, for instance—proof of its truth would rule the guilty officer out of the field of honor; the Court would not allow a gentleman to fight with such a person. You see what a solemn thing it is; you see how particular they are; any little careless act can lose you your privilege of getting yourself shot, here. The Court seems to have gone into the matter in a searching and careful fashion, for several months elapsed before it reached a decision. It then sanctioned a duel and the accused killed his accuser.
Randomly selecting from my records, I find a duel in Tarnopol between two military officers. An officer from the Tenth Dragoons accused an officer from the Ninth Dragoons of violating the rules of card games. There was some ambiguity that needed review by a Court of Honor. As a result, the case was sent to Lemberg for examination. It would be interesting to know what the issue was, but the newspaper doesn’t say. Someone here, who has fought in many duels and has a reputation, claims that the real question was whether the accusation was valid. If the allegation was serious—like cheating, for example—proof of its truth would disqualify the guilty officer from the honorable field; the Court wouldn't allow a gentleman to duel someone like that. You can see how serious this is; they are very meticulous; even a small mistake can cost you the right to be challenged here. The Court seemed to have investigated thoroughly, as several months passed before they made a ruling. They eventually approved a duel, and the accused ended up killing his accuser.
[Pg 15]Next I find a duel between a prince and a major; first with pistols—no result satisfactory to either party; then with sabres, and the major badly hurt.
[Pg 15]Next, I witness a duel between a prince and a major; first with pistols—no outcome that satisfies either of them; then with sabers, and the major ends up seriously injured.
Next, a sabre-duel between journalists—the one a strong man, the other feeble and in poor health. It was brief; the strong one drove his sword through the weak one, and death was immediate.
Next, a sword fight between two journalists—the first a strong man, the second weak and in poor health. It was quick; the strong one plunged his sword into the weak one, and death came instantly.
Next, a duel between a lieutenant and a student of medicine. According to the newspaper report these are the details. The student was in a restaurant one evening: passing along, he halted at a table to speak with some friends; near by sat a dozen military men; the student conceived that one of these was "staring" at him; he asked the officer to step outside and explain. This officer and another one gathered up their caps and sabres and went out with the student. Outside—this is the student's account—the student introduced himself to the offending officer and said, "You seemed to stare at me"; for answer, the officer struck at the student with his fist; the student parried the blow; both officers drew their sabres and attacked the young fellow, and one of them gave him a wound on the left arm; then they withdrew. This was Saturday night. The duel followed on Monday, in the military riding-school—the customary duelling-ground all over Austria, apparently. The weapons were pistols. The duelling terms were somewhat beyond custom in the matter of severity, if I may gather that from the statement that the combat was fought "unter sehr schweren Bedingungen"—to wit, "Distance, 15 steps—with 3 steps advance." There was but one exchange of shots. The student was hit. "He put his hand on his breast, his body began to bend slowly forward, then collapsed in death and sank to the ground."
Next, a duel between a lieutenant and a medical student. According to the newspaper report, here are the details. One evening, the student was at a restaurant and stopped at a table to chat with some friends; nearby, a group of about a dozen soldiers was sitting. The student felt that one of them was “staring” at him, so he asked the officer to step outside and clarify things. The officer, along with another soldier, grabbed their caps and sabers and went outside with the student. Outside—according to the student’s account—he introduced himself to the officer and said, “You seemed to be staring at me.” The officer responded by hitting the student with his fist; the student deflected the blow. Both officers then drew their sabers and attacked the young man, causing a wound to his left arm before they stepped back. This happened on Saturday night. The duel took place on Monday at the military riding school—the usual dueling ground throughout Austria, it seems. They used pistols. The terms of the duel were somewhat stricter than usual, as indicated by the statement that the combat was fought "unter sehr schweren Bedingungen"—namely, "Distance, 15 steps—with 3 steps advance." There was only one exchange of shots. The student was hit. "He put his hand on his chest, his body slowly bent forward, then collapsed in death and fell to the ground."
It is pathetic. There are other duels in my list, but I find in each and all of them one and the same ever-recurring defect—the principals are never present, but only their sham representatives. The real principals in any duel are not the duellists themselves, but their families. They do the mourning, the suffering, theirs is the loss and theirs the misery. They stake all that, the duellist stakes nothing but his life, and that is a trivial thing compared with what his death must cost those whom he leaves behind him. Challenges should not mention the duellist; he has nothing much at stake, and the real vengeance cannot reach him. The challenge should summon the offender's old gray mother, and his young wife and his little children,—these, or any to whom he is a dear and worshipped possession—and should say, "You have done me no harm, but I am the meek slave of a custom which requires me to crush the happiness out of your hearts and condemn you to years of pain and grief, in order that I may wash clean with your tears a stain which has been put upon me by another person."
It’s sad. There are other duels on my list, but I see the same recurring issue in every single one of them—the main players are never present, only their fake representatives. The real main players in any duel aren’t the fighters themselves, but their families. They are the ones who mourn, who suffer; they face the loss and the pain. They risk everything, while the duelist risks only his life, which is a small price to pay compared to the agony his death will cause those he leaves behind. Challenges shouldn’t mention the duelist; he has little to lose, and the true revenge can’t affect him. The challenge should call out the offender's old gray mother, his young wife, and his little children—these, or anyone he holds dear—and should say, “You haven’t harmed me, but I am a willing slave to a custom that demands I destroy your happiness and condemn you to years of pain and grief so that I can cleanse a stain that was placed on me by someone else.”
The logic of it is admirable: a person has robbed me of a penny; I must beggar ten innocent persons to make good my loss. Surely nobody's "honor" is worth all that.
The reasoning behind it is impressive: someone has stolen a penny from me; I have to ruin ten innocent people to recover what I lost. Surely no one’s "honor" is worth that.
Since the duellist's family are the real principals in a duel, the State ought to compel them to be present at it. Custom, also, ought to be[Pg 16] so amended as to require it; and without it no duel ought to be allowed to go on. If that student's unoffending mother had been present and watching the officer through her tears as he raised his pistol, he—why, he would have fired in the air. We know that. For we know how we are all made. Laws ought to be based upon the ascertained facts of our nature. It would be a simple thing to make a duelling law which would stop duelling.
Since the families of the duelists are the real key players in a duel, the State should require them to be there. Custom should also be[Pg 16] changed to mandate it; and without their presence, no duel should be permitted to take place. If that innocent student's mother had been there, watching the officer through her tears as he raised his pistol, he—well, he would have shot in the air. We know that. Because we understand how we all are. Laws should be based on the factual understanding of our nature. It would be straightforward to create a dueling law that would effectively end dueling.
As things are now, the mother is never invited. She submits to this; and without outward complaint, for she, too, is the vassal of custom, and custom requires her to conceal her pain when she learns the disastrous news that her son must go to the duelling-field, and by the powerful force that is lodged in habit and custom she is enabled to obey this trying requirement—a requirement which exacts a miracle of her, and gets it. Last January a neighbor of ours who has a young son in the army was wakened by this youth at three o'clock one morning, and she sat up in bed and listened to his message:
As things stand now, the mother is never invited. She accepts this; without any outward complaint, because she, too, is bound by tradition, and tradition demands that she hide her pain when she hears the awful news that her son must go to the dueling ground. With the immense influence of habit and tradition, she manages to meet this demanding expectation—a demand that requires a miracle from her, and she delivers. Last January, a neighbor of ours, who has a young son in the army, was awakened by him at three o'clock one morning, and she sat up in bed and listened to his message:
"I have come to tell you something, mother, which will distress you, but you must be good and brave, and bear it. I have been affronted by a fellow officer, and we fight at three this afternoon. Lie down and sleep, now, and think no more about it."
"I've come to share something with you, mom, that will upset you, but you need to be strong and handle it. I've had a confrontation with another officer, and we're going to duel at three this afternoon. Please lie down and rest now, and try not to think about it anymore."
She kissed him good night and lay down paralyzed with grief and fear, but said nothing. But she did not sleep; she prayed and mourned till the first streak of dawn, then fled to the nearest church and implored the Virgin for help; and from that church she went to another and another and another; church after church, and still church after church, and so spent all the day until three o'clock on her knees in agony and tears; then dragged herself home and sat down comfortless and desolate, to count the minutes, and wait, with an outward show of calm, for what had been ordained for her—happiness, or endless misery. Presently she heard the clank of a sabre—she had not known before what music was in that sound!—and her son put his head in and said:
She kissed him goodnight and lay down, frozen with grief and fear, but didn’t say anything. She didn’t sleep; she prayed and mourned until the first light of dawn, then ran to the nearest church and pleaded with the Virgin for help. From that church, she went to another, and another, and another; church after church, and still church after church, spending all day on her knees in agony and tears until three o'clock. Then she dragged herself home and sat down, comfortless and desolate, counting the minutes and waiting, pretending to be calm, for what was meant to happen—happiness or endless misery. Soon, she heard the clank of a saber—she had never realized how beautiful that sound was!—and her son poked his head in and said:
"X was in the wrong, and he apologized."
"X was in the wrong, and he apologized."
So that incident was closed; and for the rest of her life the mother will always find something pleasant about the clank of a sabre, no doubt.
So that incident was over; and for the rest of her life, the mother will always find something enjoyable about the sound of a sabre, no doubt.
In one of my listed duels—however, let it go, there is nothing particularly striking about it except that the seconds interfered. And prematurely, too, for neither man was dead. This was certainly irregular. Neither of the men liked it. It was a duel with cavalry sabres, between an editor and a lieutenant. The editor walked to the hospital, the lieutenant was carried. In this country an editor who can write well is valuable, but he is not likely to remain so unless he can handle a sabre with charm.
In one of my recorded duels—never mind, there's nothing particularly remarkable about it except that the seconds stepped in. And too soon, too, because neither man was dead. This was definitely unusual. Neither of the men was happy about it. It was a duel with cavalry sabres, between an editor and a lieutenant. The editor walked to the hospital, while the lieutenant was carried. In this country, a good writer is valuable, but he’s not likely to stay that way unless he can wield a sabre with skill.
The following very recent telegram shows that also in France duels are humanely stopped as soon as they approach the (French) danger-point:
The following very recent telegram shows that even in France, duels are responsibly ended as soon as they get close to the danger point:
"Reuter's Telegram.—Paris, March 5.—The duel between Colonels Henry and Picquart took place this morning in the Riding School of[Pg 17] the Ecole Militaire, the doors of which were strictly guarded in order to prevent intrusion. The combatants, who fought with swords, were in position at ten o'clock.
"Reuter's Telegram.—Paris, March 5.—The duel between Colonels Henry and Picquart happened this morning in the Riding School of[Pg 17] the Ecole Militaire, with the doors strictly guarded to keep out any intruders. The fighters, who battled with swords, were ready at ten o'clock."
"At the first reengagement Lieutenant-Colonel Henry was slightly scratched in the fore arm, and just at the same moment his own blade appeared to touch his adversary's neck. Senator Ranc, who was Colonel Picquart's second, stopped the fight, but as it was found that his principal had not been touched, the combat continued. A very sharp encounter ensued, in which Colonel Henry was wounded in the elbow, and the duel terminated."
"At the first round of fighting, Lieutenant-Colonel Henry got a minor scratch on his forearm, and at the same time, his blade seemed to graze his opponent's neck. Senator Ranc, who was Colonel Picquart's second, called for a pause, but since it was determined that his principal had not been harmed, the duel went on. A very intense clash followed, during which Colonel Henry was injured in the elbow, and the duel came to an end."
After which, the stretcher and the band. In lurid contrast with this delicate flirtation, we have this fatal duel of day before yesterday in Italy, where the earnest Austrian duel is in vogue. I knew Cavalotti slightly, and this gives me a sort of personal interest in his duel. I first saw him in Rome several years ago. He was sitting on a block of stone in the Forum, and was writing something in his note-book—a poem or a challenge, or something like that—and the friend who pointed him out to me said, "That is Cavalotti—he has fought thirty duels; do not disturb him." I did not disturb him.
After that, the stretcher and the band. In stark contrast to this lighthearted flirting, we have the deadly duel from the day before yesterday in Italy, where the serious Austrian duel is popular. I knew Cavalotti a little, which gives me a personal interest in his duel. I first saw him in Rome several years ago. He was sitting on a stone block in the Forum, writing something in his notebook—a poem or a challenge, or something like that—and the friend who pointed him out to me said, "That's Cavalotti—he's fought thirty duels; don’t bother him." I didn’t bother him.
[May 13, 1907.] It is a long time ago. Cavalotti—poet, orator, satirist, statesman, patriot—was a great man, and his death was deeply lamented by his countrymen: many monuments to his memory testify to this. In his duels he killed several of his antagonists and disabled the rest. By nature he was a little irascible. Once when the officials of the library of Bologna threw out his books the gentle poet went up there and challenged the whole fifteen! His parliamentary duties were exacting, but he proposed to keep coming up and fighting duels between trains until all those officials had been retired from the activities of life. Although he always chose the sword to fight with, he had never had a lesson with that weapon. When game was called he waited for nothing, but always plunged at his opponent and rained such a storm of wild and original thrusts and whacks upon him that the man was dead or crippled before he could bring his science to bear. But his latest antagonist discarded science, and won. He held his sword straight forward like a lance when Cavalotti made his plunge—with the result that he impaled himself upon it. It entered his mouth and passed out at the back of his neck. Death was instantaneous.
[May 13, 1907.] It was a long time ago. Cavalotti—poet, speaker, satirist, politician, patriot—was a remarkable man, and his death was mourned deeply by his fellow countrymen; many monuments in his honor show this. In his duels, he killed several of his opponents and injured the rest. He was naturally a bit hot-tempered. Once, when the officials at the Bologna library threw out his books, the mild-mannered poet went there and challenged all fifteen of them! His duties in parliament were demanding, but he decided to keep showing up and having duels between train rides until all those officials were removed from public life. Although he always chose to fight with a sword, he had never taken any lessons in using it. When the fight began, he didn’t wait around; he lunged at his opponent and unleashed a barrage of frenzied and unpredictable thrusts and strikes so quickly that the other man was either dead or injured before he could effectively use his skill. However, his most recent opponent ignored technique and won. He held his sword straight out like a lance as Cavalotti charged—resulting in Cavalotti impaling himself on it. The blade entered his mouth and exited through the back of his neck. Death was instant.
[Dictated December 20, 1906.] Six months ago, when I was recalling early days in San Francisco, I broke off at a place where[Pg 18] I was about to tell about Captain Osborn's odd adventure at the "What Cheer," or perhaps it was at another cheap feeding-place—the "Miners' Restaurant." It was a place where one could get good food on the cheapest possible terms, and its popularity was great among the multitudes whose purses were light It was a good place to go to, to observe mixed humanity. Captain Osborn and Bret Harte went there one day and took a meal, and in the course of it Osborn fished up an interesting reminiscence of a dozen years before and told about it. It was to this effect:
[Dictated December 20, 1906.] Six months ago, when I was reminiscing about the early days in San Francisco, I paused at a point where[Pg 18] I was about to share Captain Osborn's unusual adventure at the "What Cheer," or maybe it was at another budget-friendly spot—the "Miners' Restaurant." It was a place where you could get good food at the lowest possible prices, and it was very popular among the many people who were short on cash. It was a great spot to observe a mix of humanity. One day, Captain Osborn and Bret Harte went there for a meal, and during it, Osborn recalled an interesting story from twelve years earlier and shared it. It went like this:
He was a midshipman in the navy when the Californian gold craze burst upon the world and set it wild with excitement. His ship made the long journey around the Horn and was approaching her goal, the Golden Gate, when an accident happened.
He was a midshipman in the navy when the California gold rush hit and drove everyone crazy with excitement. His ship made the long journey around the Horn and was nearing its destination, the Golden Gate, when an accident occurred.
"It happened to me," said Osborn. "I fell overboard. There was a heavy sea running, but no one was much alarmed about me, because we had on board a newly patented life-saving device which was believed to be competent to rescue anything that could fall overboard, from a midshipman to an anchor. Ours was the only ship that had this device; we were very proud of it, and had been anxious to give its powers a practical test. This thing was lashed to the garboard-strake of the main-to'gallant mizzen-yard amidships,[19] and there was nothing to do but cut the lashings and heave it over; it would do the rest. One day the cry of 'Man overboard!' brought all hands on deck. Instantly the lashings were cut and the machine flung joyously over. Damnation, it went to the bottom like an anvil! By the time that the ship was brought to and a boat manned, I was become but a bobbing speck on the waves half a mile astern and losing my strength very fast; but by good luck there was a common seaman on board who had practical ideas in his head and hadn't waited to see what the patent machine was going to do, but had run aft and sprung over after me the moment the alarm was cried through the ship. I had a good deal of a start of him, and the seas made his progress slow and difficult, but he stuck to his work and fought his way to me, and just in the nick of time he put his saving arms about me when I was about to go down. He held me up until the boat reached us and rescued us. By that time I was unconscious, and I was still unconscious when we arrived at the ship. A dangerous fever followed, and I was de[Pg 19]lirious for three days; then I come to myself and at once inquired for my benefactor, of course. He was gone. We were lying at anchor in the Bay and every man had deserted to the gold-mines except the commissioned officers. I found out nothing about my benefactor but his name—Burton Sanders—a name which I have held in grateful memory ever since. Every time I have been on the Coast, these twelve or thirteen years, I have tried to get track of him, but have never succeeded. I wish I could find him and make him understand that his brave act has never been forgotten by me. Harte, I would rather see him and take him by the hand than any other man on the planet."
"It happened to me," said Osborn. "I fell overboard. The sea was rough, but no one was too worried about me because we had on board a new life-saving device that everyone thought could rescue anything that fell overboard, from a midshipman to an anchor. Ours was the only ship with this device; we were really proud of it and eager to put it to the test. The device was secured to the garboard-strake of the main-to'gallant mizzen-yard amidships,[19] and all we had to do was cut the bindings and throw it in; it would take care of the rest. One day, the shout of 'Man overboard!' brought everyone on deck. Immediately, we cut the bindings and tossed the machine over excitedly. To our dismay, it sank like a stone! By the time the ship was turned around and a boat was launched, I was just a tiny dot on the water half a mile behind and losing strength quickly; luckily, there was a regular seaman aboard who had practical sense and didn't wait to see what the device would do. He dashed after me the moment the alarm was sounded. I had quite a lead on him, and the waves made it hard for him to reach me, but he persevered and fought his way to me, just in time to grab me before I went under. He held me up until the boat got to us and rescued us. By that point, I was unconscious, and I remained that way when we got back to the ship. I developed a dangerous fever and was delirious for three days; then I came to and immediately asked for my hero, of course. He was gone. We were anchored in the bay, and all the men had deserted for the gold mines, except for the commissioned officers. I found out nothing about my rescuer except his name—Burton Sanders—a name I have remembered with gratitude ever since. Every time I've been on the Coast over the past twelve or thirteen years, I've tried to track him down, but I've never succeeded. I wish I could find him and let him know that his brave act has never been forgotten by me. Harte, I would rather see him and shake his hand than any other man in the world."
At this stage or a little later there was an interruption. A waiter near by said to another waiter, pointing,
At this point, or a little later, there was a disruption. A waiter nearby said to another waiter, pointing,
"Take a look at that tramp that's coming in. Ain't that the one that bilked the house, last week, out of ten cents?"
"Check out that bum coming in. Isn’t that the one who ripped off the place last week for ten cents?"
"I believe it is. Let him alone—don't pay any attention to him; wait till we can get a good look at him."
"I think it is. Just leave him alone—don't pay any attention to him; let's wait until we can get a good look at him."
The tramp approached timidly and hesitatingly, with the air of one unsure and apprehensive. The waiters watched him furtively. When he was passing behind Harte's chair one of them said,
The hobo walked up timidly and hesitantly, looking unsure and nervous. The waiters watched him quietly. As he moved behind Harte's chair, one of them said,
"He's the one!"—and they pounced upon him and proposed to turn him over to the police as a bilk. He begged piteously. He confessed his guilt, but said he had been driven to his crime by necessity—that when he had eaten the plate of beans and flipped out without paying for it, it was because he was starving, and hadn't the ten cents to pay for it with. But the waiters would listen to no explanations, no palliations; he must be placed in custody. He brushed his hand across his eyes and said meekly that he would submit, being friendless. Each waiter took him by an arm and faced him about to conduct him away. Then his melancholy eyes fell upon Captain Osborn, and a light of glad and eager recognition flashed from them. He said,
"He's the one!"—and they jumped on him and suggested turning him over to the police as a scam artist. He begged desperately. He admitted his wrongdoing, but explained that he had committed the crime out of necessity—that when he had eaten the plate of beans and left without paying, it was because he was starving, and didn't have the ten cents to pay for it. But the waiters wouldn’t accept any explanations or excuses; he had to be taken into custody. He wiped his eyes and said quietly that he would comply, being all alone. Each waiter grabbed him by an arm and turned him around to take him away. Then his sad eyes landed on Captain Osborn, and a spark of joy and eager recognition lit up his face. He said,
"Weren't you a midshipman once, sir, in the old 'Lancaster'?"
"Weren't you a midshipman back in the day on the old 'Lancaster,' sir?"
"Yes," said Osborn. "Why?"
"Yeah," said Osborn. "Why?"
"Didn't you fall overboard?"
"Didn't you fall into the water?"
"Yes, I did. How do you come to know about it?"
"Yes, I did. How did you find out about it?"
"Wasn't there a new patent machine aboard, and didn't they throw it over to save you?"
"Wasn’t there a new patent machine on board, and didn’t they toss it over to save you?"
"Why, yes," said Osborn, laughing gently, "but it didn't do it."
"Sure," Osborn said with a light laugh, "but it didn't happen."
"It certainly was. Look here, my man, you are getting distinctly interesting. Were you of our crew?"
"It definitely was. Listen, my friend, you're becoming quite interesting. Were you part of our crew?"
"Yes, sir, I was."
"Yes, I was, sir."
"I reckon you may be right. You do certainly know a good deal about that incident. What is your name?"
"I think you might be right. You definitely know a lot about that incident. What's your name?"
"Burton Sanders."
"Burton Sanders."
The Captain sprang up, excited, and said,
The Captain jumped up, thrilled, and said,
"Give me your hand! Give me both your hands! I'd rather shake them than inherit a fortune!"—and then he cried to the waiters, "Let him go!—take your hands off! He is my guest, and can have anything and everything this house is able to furnish. I am responsible."
"Give me your hand! Give me both your hands! I’d rather shake them than inherit a fortune!"—and then he shouted to the waiters, "Let him go!—get your hands off! He’s my guest and can have anything and everything this place can offer. I take full responsibility."
There was a love-feast, then. Captain Osborn ordered it regardless of expense, and he and Harte sat there and listened while the man told stirring adventures of his life and fed himself up to the eyebrows. Then Osborn wanted to be benefactor in his turn, and pay back some of his debt. The man said it could all be paid with ten dollars—that it had been so long since he had owned that amount of money that it would seem a fortune to him, and he should be grateful beyond words if the Captain could spare him that amount. The Captain spared him ten broad twenty-dollar gold pieces, and made him take them in spite of his modest protestations, and gave him his address and said he must never fail to give him notice when he needed grateful service.
There was a feast, then. Captain Osborn called for it without worrying about the cost, and he and Harte listened as the man shared exciting stories from his life while he filled his plate. Then Osborn wanted to return the kindness and repay some of his debt. The man said he could cover everything with ten dollars—that it had been so long since he had had that much money that it would feel like a fortune to him, and he would be immensely grateful if the Captain could give him that amount. The Captain gave him ten large twenty-dollar gold pieces and insisted he take them despite his modest objections. He also gave him his address and said he should always let him know whenever he needed help in return.
Several months later Harte stumbled upon the man in the street. He was most comfortably drunk, and pleasant and chatty. Harte remarked upon the splendidly and movingly dramatic incident of the restaurant, and said,
Several months later, Harte ran into the man on the street. He was pleasantly drunk, friendly, and talkative. Harte brought up the wonderfully dramatic incident at the restaurant and said,
"How curious and fortunate and happy and interesting it was that you two should come together, after that long separation, and at exactly the right moment to save you from disaster and turn your defeat by the waiters into a victory. A preacher could make a great sermon out of that, for it does look as if the hand of Providence was in it."
"How interesting and fortunate it was that you two came together after such a long time apart, and at just the right moment to save you from disaster and turn your defeat by the waiters into a victory. A preacher could make a great sermon out of that, because it really seems like Providence was involved."
The hero's face assumed a sweetly genial expression, and he said,
The hero's face took on a friendly smile, and he said,
"Well now, it wasn't Providence this time. I was running the arrangements myself."
"Well, it wasn't fate this time. I was handling the arrangements myself."
"How do you mean?"
"What do you mean?"
[Pg 21]"Oh, I hadn't ever seen the gentleman before. I was at the next table, with my back to you the whole time he was telling about it. I saw my chance, and slipped out and fetched the two waiters with me and offered to give them a commission out of what I could get out of the Captain if they would do a quarrel act with me and give me an opening. So, then, after a minute or two I straggled back, and you know the rest of it as well as I do."
[Pg 21]"Oh, I had never seen the guy before. I was at the next table, facing away from you the whole time he was talking about it. I saw my chance, so I slipped out, got the two waiters to come with me, and offered to give them a cut of whatever I could get from the Captain if they’d help me start a scene. After a minute or two, I wandered back, and you know the rest just as well as I do."
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
To be Continued.
FOOTNOTES:
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXXIII.
OCTOBER, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXIII.
BY MARK TWAIN.
[Dictated March 9, 1906.] ... I am talking of a time sixty years ago, and upwards. I remember the names of some of those schoolmates, and, by fitful glimpses, even their faces rise dimly before me for a moment—only just long enough to be recognized; then they vanish. I catch glimpses of George Robards, the Latin pupil—slender, pale, studious, bending over his book and absorbed in it, his long straight black hair hanging down below his jaws like a pair of curtains on the sides of his face. I can see him give his head a toss and flirt one of the curtains back around his head—to get it out of his way, apparently; really to show off. In that day it was a great thing among the boys to have hair of so flexible a sort that it could be flung back in that way, with a flirt of the head. George Robards was the envy of us all. For there was no hair among[Pg 162] us that was so competent for this exhibition as his—except, perhaps, the yellow locks of Will Bowen and John Robards. My hair was a dense ruck of short curls, and so was my brother Henry's. We tried all kinds of devices to get these crooks straightened out so that they would flirt, but we never succeeded. Sometimes, by soaking our heads and then combing and brushing our hair down tight and flat to our skulls, we could get it straight, temporarily, and this gave us a comforting moment of joy; but the first time we gave it a flirt it all shrivelled into curls again and our happiness was gone.
[Dictated March 9, 1906.] ... I'm talking about a time over sixty years ago. I remember the names of some of those classmates, and, in fleeting glimpses, I can even see their faces appear faintly before me for a moment—just long enough to recognize them; then they disappear. I catch glimpses of George Robards, the Latin student—slender, pale, studious, leaning over his book and completely absorbed in it, his long straight black hair hanging down below his jaw like curtains on either side of his face. I can see him toss his head and flick one of those curtains back around his head—to get it out of the way, it seems; but really, to show off. Back then, it was a big deal among the boys to have hair so flexible that it could be flipped back like that with a flick of the head. George Robards was the envy of all of us. No other hair among[Pg 162] us had such flair for this display as his—except maybe the blonde locks of Will Bowen and John Robards. My hair was a thick mess of short curls, and so was my brother Henry's. We tried all kinds of tricks to straighten these curls out so they could flip like that, but we never succeeded. Sometimes, by soaking our heads and then combing and brushing our hair down tight and flat to our scalps, we could get it straight, temporarily, and this would give us a brief moment of joy; but the first time we tried to flip it, it all shriveled back into curls again and our happiness was gone.
John Robards was the little brother of George; he was a wee chap with silky golden curtains to his face which dangled to his shoulders and below, and could be flung back ravishingly. When he was twelve years old he crossed the plains with his father amidst the rush of the gold-seekers of '49; and I remember the departure of the cavalcade when it spurred westward. We were all there to see and to envy. And I can still see that proud little chap sailing by on a great horse, with his long locks streaming out behind. We were all on hand to gaze and envy when he returned, two years later, in unimaginable glory—for he had travelled! None of us had ever been forty miles from home. But he had crossed the Continent. He had been in the gold-mines, that fairyland of our imagination. And he had done a still more wonderful thing. He had been in ships—in ships on the actual ocean; in ships on three actual oceans. For he had sailed down the Pacific and around the Horn among icebergs and through snow-storms and wild wintry gales, and had sailed on and turned the corner and flown northward in the trades and up through the blistering equatorial waters—and there in his brown face were the proofs of what he had been through. We would have sold our souls to Satan for the privilege of trading places with him.
John Robards was George's little brother; he was a small kid with silky golden hair that hung down to his shoulders and could be tossed back beautifully. When he was twelve, he crossed the plains with his father among the rush of gold-seekers in '49, and I remember the departure of the caravan as it headed west. Everyone was there to watch and to envy him. I can still picture that proud little kid riding by on a big horse, his long hair streaming behind him. We all gathered to stare and envy when he returned two years later, in unimaginable glory—because he had traveled! None of us had ever been more than forty miles from home. But he had crossed the continent. He had been to the gold mines, that fairyland we dreamed about. And he had done something even more incredible. He had been on ships—on ships on the actual ocean; on ships on three real oceans. He had sailed down the Pacific and around the Horn among icebergs, through snowstorms and wild winter gales, then sailed on, turned the corner, and headed north with the trade winds, moving up through the blistering equatorial waters—and on his brown face were the marks of everything he had experienced. We would have sold our souls to Satan just for the chance to switch places with him.
I saw him when I was out on that Missouri trip four years ago. He was old then—though not quite so old as I—and the burden of life was upon him. He said his granddaughter, twelve years old, had read my books and would like to see me. It was a pathetic time, for she was a prisoner in her room and marked for death. And John knew that she was passing swiftly away. Twelve years old—just her grandfather's age when he rode away on that great journey with his yellow hair flapping behind him.[Pg 163] In her I seemed to see that boy again. It was as if he had come back out of that remote past and was present before me in his golden youth. Her malady was heart disease, and her brief life came to a close a few days later.
I saw him on that trip to Missouri four years ago. He was old then—though not quite as old as I—and life had taken its toll on him. He mentioned that his twelve-year-old granddaughter had read my books and wanted to meet me. It was a heartbreaking situation because she was confined to her room and was facing death. John knew she was fading fast. Twelve years old—just the age his grandfather was when he set off on that great journey with his yellow hair blowing in the wind.[Pg 163] In her, I felt like I was seeing that boy again. It was as if he had returned from that distant past, standing before me in his youthful glory. She was suffering from heart disease, and her short life ended just a few days later.
Another of those schoolboys was John Garth. He became a prosperous banker and a prominent and valued citizen; and a few years ago he died, rich and honored. He died. It is what I have to say about so many of those boys and girls. The widow still lives, and there are grandchildren. In her pantalette days and my barefoot days she was a schoolmate of mine. I saw John's tomb when I made that Missouri visit.
Another one of those schoolboys was John Garth. He became a successful banker and a respected and valued member of the community; and a few years ago, he passed away, wealthy and honored. He passed away. That's what I have to say about so many of those boys and girls. The widow is still alive, and there are grandchildren. In her bloomers and my barefoot days, she was a classmate of mine. I saw John's grave when I visited Missouri.
Her father, Mr. Kercheval, had an apprentice in the early days when I was nine years old, and he had also a slave woman who had many merits. But I can't feel very kindly or forgivingly toward either that good apprentice boy or that good slave woman, for they saved my life. One day when I was playing on a loose log which I supposed was attached to a raft—but it wasn't—it tilted me into Bear Creek. And when I had been under water twice and was coming up to make the third and fatal descent my fingers appeared above the water and that slave woman seized them and pulled me out. Within a week I was in again, and that apprentice had to come along just at the wrong time, and he plunged in and dived, pawed around on the bottom and found me, and dragged me out and emptied the water out of me, and I was saved again. I was drowned seven times after that before I learned to swim—once in Bear Creek and six times in the Mississippi. I do not now know who the people were who interfered with the intentions of a Providence wiser than themselves, but I hold a grudge against them yet. When I told the tale of these remarkable happenings to Rev. Dr. Burton of Hartford, he said he did not believe it. He slipped on the ice the very next year and sprained his ankle.
Her father, Mr. Kercheval, had an apprentice when I was nine years old, and he also had a slave woman who was quite remarkable. But I can't really be kind or forgiving toward either that good apprentice boy or that good slave woman, because they saved my life. One day, while I was playing on a loose log, which I thought was attached to a raft—but it wasn't—I fell into Bear Creek. After being underwater twice and just about to go down for the third and final time, my fingers surfaced, and that slave woman grabbed them and pulled me out. Within a week, I fell in again, and that apprentice happened to be there at the wrong time; he jumped in, dove, searched the bottom, found me, and dragged me out, emptying the water from my lungs, and I was saved once more. I nearly drowned seven times after that before I finally learned to swim—once in Bear Creek and six times in the Mississippi. I don't know who those people were that disrupted what was probably a wiser plan from Providence, but I still hold a grudge against them. When I shared these incredible events with Rev. Dr. Burton from Hartford, he said he didn't believe me. He slipped on the ice the following year and sprained his ankle.
Will Bowen was another schoolmate, and so was his brother, Sam, who was his junior by a couple of years. Before the Civil War broke out, both became St. Louis and New Orleans pilots. Both are dead, long ago.
Will Bowen was another classmate, and so was his brother, Sam, who was a couple of years younger. Before the Civil War started, both became pilots in St. Louis and New Orleans. They have both been gone for a long time.
[Dictated March 16, 1906.] We will return to those schoolchildren of sixty years ago. I recall Mary Miller. She was not my first sweetheart, but I think she was the first one that furnished me a broken heart. I fell in love with her[Pg 164] when she was eighteen and I was nine, but she scorned me, and I recognized that this was a cold world. I had not noticed that temperature before. I believe I was as miserable as even a grown man could be. But I think that this sorrow did not remain with me long. As I remember it, I soon transferred my worship to Artimisia Briggs, who was a year older than Mary Miller. When I revealed my passion to her she did not scoff at it. She did not make fun of it. She was very kind and gentle about it. But she was also firm, and said she did not want to be pestered by children.
[Dictated March 16, 1906.] Let's go back to those schoolchildren from sixty years ago. I remember Mary Miller. She wasn't my first crush, but I think she was the first one to break my heart. I fell for her[Pg 164] when she was eighteen and I was nine, but she rejected me, and I realized that the world could be pretty harsh. I hadn't noticed that before. I think I was as miserable as any adult could be. But I don't think that sadness lasted long. As I recall, I quickly shifted my admiration to Artimisia Briggs, who was a year older than Mary Miller. When I confessed my feelings to her, she didn’t laugh at me. She wasn’t mean about it. She was kind and gentle, but she was also clear, and said she didn’t want to be bothered by kids.
And there was Mary Lacy. She was a schoolmate. But she also was out of my class because of her advanced age. She was pretty wild and determined and independent. But she married, and at once settled down and became in all ways a model matron and was as highly respected as any matron in the town. Four years ago she was still living, and had been married fifty years.
And there was Mary Lacy. She was a classmate, but she was also older than the rest of us, so she was out of my grade. She was pretty free-spirited, determined, and independent. But when she got married, she quickly settled down and became a model wife, respected by everyone in town. Four years ago, she was still alive and had been married for fifty years.
Jimmie McDaniel was another schoolmate. His age and mine about tallied. His father kept the candy-shop and he was the most envied little chap in the town—after Tom Blankenship ("Huck Finn")—for although we never saw him eating candy, we supposed that it was, nevertheless, his ordinary diet. He pretended that he never ate it, and didn't care for it because there was nothing forbidden about it—there was plenty of it and he could have as much of it as he wanted. He was the first human being to whom I ever told a humorous story, so far as I can remember. This was about Jim Wolfe and the cats; and I gave him that tale the morning after that memorable episode. I thought he would laugh his teeth out. I had never been so proud and happy before, and have seldom been so proud and happy since. I saw him four years ago when I was out there. He wore a beard, gray and venerable, that came half-way down to his knees, and yet it was not difficult for me to recognize him. He had been married fifty-four years. He had many children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren, and also even posterity, they all said—thousands—yet the boy to whom I had told the cat story when we were callow juveniles was still present in that cheerful little old man.
Jimmie McDaniel was another classmate. Our ages were pretty much the same. His dad ran the candy shop, and he was the most envied kid in town—after Tom Blankenship ("Huck Finn")—because even though we never saw him eating candy, we figured it was his usual diet. He acted like he never ate it and didn't care for it since there was nothing forbidden about it—there was plenty of it, and he could have as much as he wanted. He was the first person I ever told a funny story to, as far as I can remember. It was about Jim Wolfe and the cats, and I shared that story with him the morning after that unforgettable event. I thought he would laugh so hard he’d lose his teeth. I had never felt so proud and happy before, and I'm not sure I've felt that way since. I saw him four years ago when I visited. He had a long, gray beard that reached halfway down to his knees, but I still recognized him easily. He had been married for fifty-four years. He had many children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, and even a lot of descendants—thousands, they all said—but the boy I told the cat story to when we were young was still there in that cheerful little old man.
Artimisia Briggs got married not long after refusing me. She married Richmond, the stone mason, who was my Methodist Sunday-school teacher in the earliest days, and he had one dis[Pg 165]tinction which I envied him: at some time or other he had hit his thumb with his hammer and the result was a thumb nail which remained permanently twisted and distorted and curved and pointed, like a parrot's beak. I should not consider it an ornament now, I suppose, but it had a fascination for me then, and a vast value, because it was the only one in the town. He was a very kindly and considerate Sunday-school teacher, and patient and compassionate, so he was the favorite teacher with us little chaps. In that school they had slender oblong pasteboard blue tickets, each with a verse from the Testament printed on it, and you could get a blue ticket by reciting two verses. By reciting five verses you could get three blue tickets, and you could trade these at the bookcase and borrow a book for a week. I was under Mr. Richmond's spiritual care every now and then for two or three years, and he was never hard upon me. I always recited the same five verses every Sunday. He was always satisfied with the performance. He never seemed to notice that these were the same five foolish virgins that he had been hearing about every Sunday for months. I always got my tickets and exchanged them for a book. They were pretty dreary books, for there was not a bad boy in the entire bookcase. They were all good boys and good girls and drearily uninteresting, but they were better society than none, and I was glad to have their company and disapprove of it.
Artimisia Briggs got married shortly after rejecting me. She wed Richmond, the stone mason, who was my Methodist Sunday-school teacher in my early years, and he had one distinction that I envied: at some point, he had hit his thumb with his hammer, resulting in a thumbnail that was permanently twisted, distorted, curved, and pointed, like a parrot's beak. I wouldn’t consider it an ornament now, but back then, it captivated me and had significant value because it was the only one in town. He was a very kind and considerate Sunday-school teacher, patient and compassionate, making him our favorite teacher among us little kids. In that school, they had slim rectangular blue tickets, each printed with a verse from the Testament, and you could earn a blue ticket by reciting two verses. By reciting five verses, you could get three blue tickets, which you could trade at the bookcase to borrow a book for a week. I was under Mr. Richmond's spiritual guidance on and off for two or three years, and he was never tough on me. I always recited the same five verses every Sunday. He was always satisfied with my performance. He never seemed to notice that these were the same five foolish virgins he had been hearing about every Sunday for months. I always got my tickets and exchanged them for a book. They were pretty dull books since there wasn’t a bad kid in the entire collection. They were all good boys and good girls and terribly uninteresting, but they were better company than none, and I was happy to have their company while also disapproving of it.
Twenty years ago Mr. Richmond had become possessed of Tom Sawyer's cave in the hills three miles from town, and had made a tourist-resort of it. In 1849 when the gold-seekers were streaming through our little town of Hannibal, many of our grown men got the gold fever, and I think that all the boys had it. On the Saturday holidays in summer-time we used to borrow skiffs whose owners were not present and go down the river three miles to the cave hollow (Missourian for "valley"), and there we staked out claims and pretended to dig gold, panning out half a dollar a day at first; two or three times as much, later, and by and by whole fortunes, as our imaginations became inured to the work. Stupid and unprophetic lads! We were doing this in play and never suspecting. Why, that cave hollow and all the adjacent hills were made of gold! But we did not know it. We took it for dirt. We left its rich secret in its own peaceful possession and grew up in poverty and went wandering[Pg 166] about the world struggling for bread—and this because we had not the gift of prophecy. That region was all dirt and rocks to us, yet all it needed was to be ground up and scientifically handled and it was gold. That is to say, the whole region was a cement-mine—and they make the finest kind of Portland cement there now, five thousand barrels a day, with a plant that cost $2,000,000.
Twenty years ago, Mr. Richmond acquired Tom Sawyer's cave in the hills three miles outside of town and turned it into a tourist attraction. In 1849, when gold seekers flooded our small town of Hannibal, many of the adult men caught the gold fever, and I believe all the boys did too. During summer weekends, we would borrow skiffs from their absent owners and travel down the river three miles to the cave hollow (which is what Missourians call "valley"), where we staked claims and pretended to dig for gold, initially panning out half a dollar a day; later, it was two or three times that amount, and eventually whole fortunes, as our imaginations got used to the work. We were silly and had no foresight! We were just playing, utterly unaware. That cave hollow and all the nearby hills were filled with gold! But we didn’t realize it. We thought it was just dirt. We left its rich secret undisturbed, growing up in poverty and wandering[Pg 166] around the world struggling for food—and all because we lacked the gift of prophecy. That area seemed like nothing but dirt and rocks to us, yet all it needed was some grinding and scientific handling to turn into gold. In fact, the entire region was a cement mine—and now they produce the finest kind of Portland cement there, five thousand barrels a day, from a plant that cost $2,000,000.
For a little while Reuel Gridley attended that school of ours. He was an elderly pupil; he was perhaps twenty-two or twenty-three years old. Then came the Mexican War and he volunteered. A company of infantry was raised in our town and Mr. Hickman, a tall, straight, handsome athlete of twenty-five, was made captain of it and had a sword by his side and a broad yellow stripe down the leg of his gray pants. And when that company marched back and forth through the streets in its smart uniform—which it did several times a day for drill—its evolutions were attended by all the boys whenever the school hours permitted. I can see that marching company yet, and I can almost feel again the consuming desire that I had to join it. But they had no use for boys of twelve and thirteen, and before I had a chance in another war the desire to kill people to whom I had not been introduced had passed away.
For a little while, Reuel Gridley went to our school. He was an older student, maybe around twenty-two or twenty-three years old. Then the Mexican War started, and he volunteered. A group of infantry was formed in our town, and Mr. Hickman, a tall, fit, good-looking athlete of twenty-five, became its captain, sporting a sword at his side and a wide yellow stripe down the leg of his gray pants. When that company marched through the streets in its sharp uniform—which they did several times a day for drills—all the boys would gather to watch whenever school hours allowed. I can still see that marching company and almost feel again the intense urge I had to join them. But they had no need for boys of twelve and thirteen, and by the time another war came around, my desire to kill people I hadn’t met had faded away.
I saw the splendid Hickman in his old age. He seemed about the oldest man I had ever seen—an amazing and melancholy contrast with the showy young captain I had seen preparing his warriors for carnage so many, many years before. Hickman is dead—it is the old story. As Susy said, "What is it all for?"
I saw the impressive Hickman in his old age. He looked like the oldest man I had ever seen—an astonishing and sad contrast to the flashy young captain I had watched getting his warriors ready for battle so many years ago. Hickman is gone—it’s the same old story. As Susy said, "What’s it all for?"
Reuel Gridley went away to the wars and we heard of him no more for fifteen or sixteen years. Then one day in Carson City while I was having a difficulty with an editor on the sidewalk—an editor better built for war than I was—I heard a voice say, "Give him the best you've got, Sam, I'm at your back." It was Reuel Gridley. He said he had not recognized me by my face but by my drawling style of speech.
Reuel Gridley went off to war, and we didn't hear from him for fifteen or sixteen years. Then one day in Carson City, while I was arguing with an editor on the sidewalk—an editor who seemed more suited for battle than I was—I heard a voice say, "Give him everything you've got, Sam, I've got your back." It was Reuel Gridley. He said he hadn't recognized me by my face but by my drawn-out way of speaking.
He went down to the Reese River mines about that time and presently he lost an election bet in his mining camp, and by the terms of it he was obliged to buy a fifty-pound sack of self-raising flour and carry it through the town, preceded by music, and deliver it to the winner of the bet. Of course the whole camp was present and full of fluid and enthusiasm. The winner[Pg 167] of the bet put up the sack at auction for the benefit of the United States Sanitary Fund, and sold it. The excitement grew and grew. The sack was sold over and over again for the benefit of the Fund. The news of it came to Virginia City by telegraph. It produced great enthusiasm, and Reuel Gridley was begged by telegraph to bring the sack and have an auction in Virginia City. He brought it. An open barouche was provided, also a brass band. The sack was sold over and over again at Gold Hill, then was brought up to Virginia City toward night and sold—and sold again, and again, and still again, netting twenty or thirty thousand dollars for the Sanitary Fund. Gridley carried it across California and sold it at various towns. He sold it for large sums in Sacramento and in San Francisco. He brought it East, sold it in New York and in various other cities, then carried it out to a great Fair at St. Louis, and went on selling it; and finally made it up into small cakes and sold those at a dollar apiece. First and last, the sack of flour which had originally cost ten dollars, perhaps, netted more than two hundred thousand dollars for the Sanitary Fund. Reuel Gridley has been dead these many, many years—it is the old story.
He headed down to the Reese River mines around that time and soon lost a bet on an election in his mining camp. According to the terms, he had to buy a fifty-pound sack of self-rising flour, carry it through town with a band playing, and deliver it to the winner of the bet. Naturally, the whole camp showed up, full of energy and excitement. The winner of the bet auctioned the sack off to raise money for the United States Sanitary Fund, and it was sold. The buzz kept growing. The sack was sold multiple times for the Fund's benefit. News of this reached Virginia City by telegraph, creating a lot of excitement, and Reuel Gridley was urged by telegraph to bring the sack and hold an auction in Virginia City. He did. They arranged for an open carriage and a brass band. The sack was sold repeatedly in Gold Hill, then taken to Virginia City in the evening where it was sold again and again, raising twenty or thirty thousand dollars for the Sanitary Fund. Gridley carried it across California, selling it in various towns. He made big sales in Sacramento and San Francisco. Then he took it East, selling it in New York and other cities, before bringing it to a major Fair in St. Louis where he continued selling it; ultimately, he broke it up into small cakes and sold those for a dollar each. In total, the sack of flour, which probably originally cost ten dollars, generated over two hundred thousand dollars for the Sanitary Fund. Reuel Gridley has been gone for many, many years—just an old story.
In that school were the first Jews I had ever seen. It took me a good while to get over the awe of it. To my fancy they were clothed invisibly in the damp and cobwebby mould of antiquity. They carried me back to Egypt, and in imagination I moved among the Pharaohs and all the shadowy celebrities of that remote age. The name of the boys was Levin. We had a collective name for them which was the only really large and handsome witticism that was ever born in that Congressional district. We called them "Twenty-two"—and even when the joke was old and had been worn threadbare we always followed it with the explanation, to make sure that it would be understood, "Twice Levin—twenty-two."
In that school, I saw my first Jews. It took me a while to get over the amazement of it. In my mind, they were draped in the damp and dusty mold of history. They transported me back to Egypt, and I could imagine roaming among the Pharaohs and all the famous figures of that distant time. The boys' last name was Levin. We had a collective nickname for them, which was the only really clever and attractive joke that ever came out of that Congressional district. We called them "Twenty-two"—and even when the joke got old and frayed, we always followed it up with the explanation to ensure it was understood, "Twice Levin—twenty-two."
There were other boys whose names remain with me. Irving Ayres—but no matter, he is dead. Then there was George Butler, whom I remember as a child of seven wearing a blue leather belt with a brass buckle, and hated and envied by all the boys on account of it. He was a nephew of General Ben Butler and fought gallantly at Ball's Bluff and in several other actions of the Civil War. He is dead, long and long ago.
There were other boys whose names I still remember. Irving Ayres—but it doesn't matter, he has passed away. Then there was George Butler, whom I remember as a seven-year-old wearing a blue leather belt with a brass buckle, and all the boys hated and envied him because of it. He was a nephew of General Ben Butler and fought bravely at Ball's Bluff and in several other battles of the Civil War. He has been gone for a long time.
Will Bowen (dead long ago), Ed Stevens (dead long ago)[Pg 168] and John Briggs were special mates of mine. John is still living.
Will Bowen (passed away long ago), Ed Stevens (passed away long ago)[Pg 168] and John Briggs were good friends of mine. John is still alive.
In 1845, when I was ten years old, there was an epidemic of measles in the town and it made a most alarming slaughter among the little people. There was a funeral almost daily, and the mothers of the town were nearly demented with fright. My mother was greatly troubled. She worried over Pamela and Henry and me, and took constant and extraordinary pains to keep us from coming into contact with the contagion. But upon reflection I believed that her judgment was at fault. It seemed to me that I could improve upon it if left to my own devices. I cannot remember now whether I was frightened about the measles or not, but I clearly remember that I grew very tired of the suspense I suffered on account of being continually under the threat of death. I remember that I got so weary of it and so anxious to have the matter settled one way or the other, and promptly, that this anxiety spoiled my days and my nights. I had no pleasure in them. I made up my mind to end this suspense and be done with it. Will Bowen was dangerously ill with the measles and I thought I would go down there and catch them. I entered the house by the front way and slipped along through rooms and halls, keeping sharp watch against discovery, and at last I reached Will's bed-chamber in the rear of the house on the second floor and got into it uncaptured. But that was as far as my victory reached. His mother caught me there a moment later and snatched me out of the house and gave me a most competent scolding and drove me away. She was so scared that she could hardly get her words out, and her face was white. I saw that I must manage better next time, and I did. I hung about the lane at the rear of the house and watched through cracks in the fence until I was convinced that the conditions were favorable; then I slipped through the back yard and up the back way and got into the room and into the bed with Will Bowen without being observed. I don't know how long I was in the bed. I only remember that Will Bowen, as society, had no value for me, for he was too sick to even notice that I was there. When I heard his mother coming I covered up my head, but that device was a failure. It was dead summer-time—the cover was nothing more than a limp blanket or sheet, and anybody could see that there were two of us[Pg 169] under it. It didn't remain two very long. Mrs. Bowen snatched me out of the bed and conducted me home herself, with a grip on my collar which she never loosened until she delivered me into my mother's hands along with her opinion of that kind of a boy.
In 1845, when I was ten, there was a measles outbreak in town that caused a lot of panic among the kids. Funerals were happening almost every day, and the mothers were nearly frantic with fear. My mom was really worried. She kept stressing over Pamela, Henry, and me, going to great lengths to keep us away from the disease. But looking back, I thought she was overreacting. I felt like I could handle it better on my own. I can't remember if I was scared of the measles, but I distinctly recall getting really tired of the constant anxiety that came with living under the threat of death. It wore me out, and I was eager to have things sorted out quickly because that worry ruined my days and nights. I decided I needed to put an end to this suspense. Will Bowen was seriously sick with the measles, so I figured I'd go over and catch them myself. I entered the house through the front door and quietly made my way through the rooms and halls, carefully avoiding detection, until I finally reached Will's bedroom at the back of the second floor without being caught. But that was where my success ended. His mom found me there a moment later, yanked me out of the house, gave me a solid scolding, and sent me away. She was so scared that she could barely speak, and her face was pale. I realized I had to be smarter next time, and I was. I lingered in the lane behind the house, watching through gaps in the fence until I thought things were safe; then I snuck through the backyard and entered the room to get into bed with Will Bowen without being seen. I don't know how long I stayed there. All I remember is that Will didn't really pay attention to me since he was too sick. When I heard his mom coming, I covered my head, but that plan failed. It was the middle of summer—the blanket was just a flimsy sheet, and anyone could tell there were two of us under it. It didn’t stay that way for long. Mrs. Bowen yanked me out of the bed and personally took me home, holding onto my collar the whole way until she dropped me off with my mom and shared her thoughts on what kind of boy I was.
It was a good case of measles that resulted. It brought me within a shade of death's door. It brought me to where I no longer took any interest in anything, but, on the contrary, felt a total absence of interest—which was most placid and enchanting. I have never enjoyed anything in my life any more than I enjoyed dying that time. I was, in effect, dying. The word had been passed and the family notified to assemble around the bed and see me off. I knew them all. There was no doubtfulness in my vision. They were all crying, but that did not affect me. I took but the vaguest interest in it, and that merely because I was the centre of all this emotional attention and was gratified by it and vain of it.
It was a pretty serious case of measles that I had. It brought me close to death. I reached a point where I didn’t care about anything at all; instead, I felt completely indifferent—which was oddly soothing and beautiful. I've never experienced anything in my life quite as much as I enjoyed the process of dying that time. I *was*, in fact, dying. The word was out, and the family was told to gather around my bed to say goodbye. I recognized all of them. There was no uncertainty in my perception. They were all crying, but it didn’t bother me. I was only vaguely interested in it, and that was just because I was the focus of all this emotional attention and felt pleased by it and a bit proud of it.
When Dr. Cunningham had made up his mind that nothing more could be done for me he put bags of hot ashes all over me. He put them on my breast, on my wrists, on my ankles; and so, very much to his astonishment—and doubtless to my regret—he dragged me back into this world and set me going again.
When Dr. Cunningham decided that nothing else could be done for me, he placed bags of hot ashes all over me. He put them on my chest, on my wrists, and on my ankles; and, much to his surprise—and certainly to my dismay—he brought me back to consciousness and got me going again.
[Dictated July 26, 1907.] In an article entitled "England's Ovation to Mark Twain," Sydney Brooks—but never mind that, now.
[Dictated July 26, 1907.] In an article called "England’s Tribute to Mark Twain," Sydney Brooks—but let’s not focus on that right now.
I was in Oxford by seven o'clock that evening (June 25, 1907), and trying on the scarlet gown which the tailor had been constructing, and found it right—right and surpassingly becoming. At half past ten the next morning we assembled at All Souls College and marched thence, gowned, mortar-boarded and in double file, down a long street to the Sheldonian Theatre, between solid walls of the populace, very much hurrah'd and limitlessly kodak'd. We made a procession of considerable length and distinction and picturesqueness, with the Chancellor, Lord Curzon, late Viceroy of India, in his rich robe of black and gold, in the lead, followed by a pair of trim little boy train-bearers, and the train-bearers followed by the young Prince Arthur of Connaught, who was to be made a D.C.L. The detachment of D.C.L.'s were followed by the Doctors of Science, and these by the Doctors of[Pg 170] Literature, and these in turn by the Doctors of Music. Sidney Colvin marched in front of me; I was coupled with Sidney Lee, and Kipling followed us; General Booth, of the Salvation Army, was in the squadron of D.C.L.'s.
I arrived in Oxford by seven o'clock that evening (June 25, 1907), and tried on the red gown the tailor had been making, and found it perfect—perfect and incredibly flattering. At half past ten the next morning, we gathered at All Souls College and paraded, dressed in our gowns and mortarboards, in two lines down a long street to the Sheldonian Theatre, flanked by solid walls of spectators, who cheered and took countless photos. We formed a procession of significant length and elegance, led by the Chancellor, Lord Curzon, the former Viceroy of India, in his luxurious black and gold robe, followed by two neat little boy train-bearers, and the train-bearers were followed by the young Prince Arthur of Connaught, who was to be given a D.C.L. Next came the group of D.C.L.'s, followed by the Doctors of Science, and then the Doctors of Literature, and finally, the Doctors of Music. Sidney Colvin marched in front of me; I was paired with Sidney Lee, and Kipling followed us; General Booth of the Salvation Army was also in the group of D.C.L.'s.
Our journey ended, we were halted in a fine old hall whence we could see, through a corridor of some length, the massed audience in the theatre. Here for a little time we moved about and chatted and made acquaintanceships; then the D.C.L.'s were summoned, and they marched through that corridor and the shouting began in the theatre. It would be some time before the Doctors of Literature and of Science would be called for, because each of those D.C.L.'s had to have a couple of Latin speeches made over him before his promotion would be complete—one by the Regius Professor of Civil Law, the other by the Chancellor. After a while I asked Sir William Ramsay if a person might smoke here and not get shot. He said, "Yes," but that whoever did it and got caught would be fined a guinea, and perhaps hanged later. He said he knew of a place where we could accomplish at least as much as half of a smoke before any informers would be likely to chance upon us, and he was ready to show the way to any who might be willing to risk the guinea and the hanging. By request he led the way, and Kipling, Sir Norman Lockyer and I followed. We crossed an unpopulated quadrangle and stood under one of its exits—an archway of massive masonry—and there we lit up and began to take comfort. The photographers soon arrived, but they were courteous and friendly and gave us no trouble, and we gave them none. They grouped us in all sorts of ways and photographed us at their diligent leisure, while we smoked and talked. We were there more than an hour; then we returned to headquarters, happy, content, and greatly refreshed. Presently we filed into the theatre, under a very satisfactory hurrah, and waited in a crimson column, dividing the crowded pit through the middle, until each of us in his turn should be called to stand before the Chancellor and hear our merits set forth in sonorous Latin. Meantime, Kipling and I wrote autographs until some good kind soul interfered in our behalf and procured for us a rest.
Our journey ended, we were stopped in an old hall where we could see, through a long corridor, the packed audience in the theater. For a while, we mingled, chatted, and made friends; then the D.C.L.'s were called, and the cheers started in the theater. It would take some time before the Doctors of Literature and Science would be called, since each D.C.L. needed a couple of Latin speeches before their promotion was complete—one by the Regius Professor of Civil Law and the other by the Chancellor. After a while, I asked Sir William Ramsay if it was allowed to smoke here without getting in trouble. He said, "Yes," but warned that whoever was caught would be fined a guinea and possibly face worse. He mentioned a spot where we could enjoy at least half a smoke before any informers might find us, and he was ready to guide anyone willing to risk the fine and the possible hanging. He led the way, and Kipling, Sir Norman Lockyer, and I followed. We crossed an empty courtyard and stood under one of its exits—an archway of heavy stone—and there we lit up and started to relax. The photographers soon arrived, but they were polite and friendly, causing us no trouble, and we returned the courtesy. They arranged us in various ways and took pictures at their leisure while we smoked and talked. We stayed there for over an hour; then we returned to our post, feeling happy, content, and greatly refreshed. Eventually, we made our way into the theater, welcomed by a cheerful roar, and stood in a crimson line, dividing the crowded pit until it was our turn to stand before the Chancellor and hear our accomplishments described in grand Latin. In the meantime, Kipling and I signed autographs until a kind soul intervened on our behalf and arranged for us to take a break.
I will now save what is left of my modesty by quoting a paragraph from Sydney Brooks's "Ovation."
I’m going to save what’s left of my modesty by quoting a passage from Sydney Brooks's "Ovation."
* * * * * *
* * * * * *
Let those stars take the place of it for the present. Sydney Brooks has done it well. It makes me proud to read it; as proud as I was in that old day, sixty-two years ago, when I lay dying, the centre of attraction, with one eye piously closed upon the fleeting vanities of this life—an excellent effect—and the other open a crack to observe the tears, the sorrow, the admiration—all for me—all for me!
Let those stars take its place for now. Sydney Brooks has done a great job. It makes me feel proud to read it; just as proud as I felt sixty-two years ago when I was dying, the focus of attention, with one eye closed to the fleeting distractions of this life—an impressive effect—and the other slightly open to see the tears, the sorrow, the admiration—all for me—all for me!
Ah, that was the proudest moment of my long life—until Oxford!
Ah, that was the proudest moment of my life—until Oxford!
* * * * * *
* * * * *
Most Americans have been to Oxford and will remember what a dream of the Middle Ages it is, with its crooked lanes, its gray and stately piles of ancient architecture and its meditation-breeding air of repose and dignity and unkinship with the noise and fret and hurry and bustle of these modern days. As a dream of the Middle Ages Oxford was not perfect until Pageant day arrived and furnished certain details which had been for generations lacking. These details began to appear at mid-afternoon on the 27th. At that time singles, couples, groups and squadrons of the three thousand five hundred costumed characters who were to take part in the Pageant began to ooze and drip and stream through house doors, all over the old town, and wend toward the meadows outside the walls. Soon the lanes were thronged with costumes which Oxford had from time to time seen and been familiar with in bygone centuries—fashions of dress which marked off centuries as by dates, and mile-stoned them back, and back, and back, until history faded into legend and tradition, when Arthur was a fact and the Round Table a reality. In this rich commingling of quaint and strange and brilliantly colored fashions in dress the dress-changes of Oxford for twelve centuries stood livid and realized to the eye; Oxford as a dream of the Middle Ages was complete now as it had never, in our day, before been complete; at last there was no discord; the mouldering old buildings, and the picturesque throngs drifting past them, were in harmony; soon—astonishingly soon!—the only persons that seemed out of place, and grotesquely and offensively and criminally out of place were such persons as came intruding along clothed in the ugly and odious fashions of the twentieth century; they were a bitterness to the feelings, an insult to the eye.
Most Americans have visited Oxford and will remember what a dream of the Middle Ages it is, with its winding streets, its gray and impressive ancient buildings, and its calming atmosphere of peace and dignity, entirely separate from the noise, stress, and rush of modern life. As a vision of the Middle Ages, Oxford wasn't complete until Pageant day came along and added some details that had been missing for generations. These details started to emerge in the afternoon on the 27th. At that time, individuals, couples, groups, and clusters of the three thousand five hundred costumed characters who were set to participate in the Pageant began to flow out of houses all over the old town and make their way toward the meadows outside the walls. Soon, the streets were filled with costumes that Oxford had seen and recognized from long ago—styles of dress that distinguished centuries as if they were marked by dates, taking us further back in time until history blurred into legend and tradition, when Arthur was real and the Round Table existed. In this vibrant mix of unique and colorful fashions, the clothing changes in Oxford over twelve centuries were vividly brought to life; Oxford, as a dream of the Middle Ages, had finally become whole, as it had never been in our time before; finally, there was harmony. The crumbling old buildings and the picturesque crowds drifting by them were in sync; soon—astonishingly soon!—the only people who seemed out of place, awkwardly and offensively out of place, were those who intruded dressed in the ugly and jarring styles of the twentieth century; they were a source of discomfort, an insult to the eye.
The make-ups of illustrious historic personages seemed perfect,[Pg 172] both as to portraiture and costume; one had no trouble in recognizing them. Also, I was apparently quite easily recognizable myself. The first corner I turned brought me suddenly face to face with Henry VIII, a person whom I had been implacably disliking for sixty years; but when he put out his hand with royal courtliness and grace and said, "Welcome, well-beloved stranger, to my century and to the hospitalities of my realm," my old prejudices vanished away and I forgave him. I think now that Henry the Eighth has been over-abused, and that most of us, if we had been situated as he was, domestically, would not have been able to get along with as limited a graveyard as he forced himself to put up with. I feel now that he was one of the nicest men in history. Personal contact with a king is more effective in removing baleful prejudices than is any amount of argument drawn from tales and histories. If I had a child I would name it Henry the Eighth, regardless of sex.
The appearances of famous historical figures looked perfect,[Pg 172] both in their portraits and outfits; it was easy to recognize them. Also, I seemed to be quite recognizable myself. The first corner I turned brought me face to face with Henry VIII, someone I had disliked for sixty years. But when he extended his hand with royal courtesy and said, "Welcome, beloved stranger, to my time and to the hospitality of my realm," my old prejudices faded away, and I forgave him. I now think that Henry the Eighth has been unfairly criticized, and that most of us, if we were in his position at home, wouldn’t have managed with as small a graveyard as he had to deal with. I believe he was one of the nicest men in history. Meeting a king is much more effective in dispelling old prejudices than any amount of arguments based on stories and history. If I had a child, I would name them Henry the Eighth, no matter if they were a boy or girl.
Do you remember Charles the First?—and his broad slouch with the plume in it? and his slender, tall figure? and his body clothed in velvet doublet with lace sleeves, and his legs in leather, with long rapier at his side and his spurs on his heels? I encountered him at the next corner, and knew him in a moment—knew him as perfectly and as vividly as I should know the Grand Chain in the Mississippi if I should see it from the pilot-house after all these years. He bent his body and gave his hat a sweep that fetched its plume within an inch of the ground, and gave me a welcome that went to my heart. This king has been much maligned; I shall understand him better hereafter, and shall regret him more than I have been in the habit of doing these fifty or sixty years. He did some things in his time, which might better have been left undone, and which cast a shadow upon his name—we all know that, we all concede it—but our error has been in regarding them as crimes and in calling them by that name, whereas I perceive now that they were only indiscretions. At every few steps I met persons of deathless name whom I had never encountered before outside of pictures and statuary and history, and these were most thrilling and charming encounters. I had hand-shakes with Henry the Second, who had not been seen in the Oxford streets for nearly eight hundred years; and with the Fair Rosamond, whom I now believe to have been chaste and blameless, although I had thought differently about it before; and with[Pg 173] Shakespeare, one of the pleasantest foreigners I have ever gotten acquainted with; and with Roger Bacon; and with Queen Elizabeth, who talked five minutes and never swore once—a fact which gave me a new and good opinion of her and moved me to forgive her for beheading the Scottish Mary, if she really did it, which I now doubt; and with the quaintly and anciently clad young King Harold Harefoot, of near nine hundred years ago, who came flying by on a bicycle and smoking a pipe, but at once checked up and got off to shake with me; and also I met a bishop who had lost his way because this was the first time he had been inside the walls of Oxford for as much as twelve hundred years or thereabouts. By this time I had grown so used to the obliterated ages and their best-known people that if I had met Adam I should not have been either surprised or embarrassed; and if he had come in a racing automobile and a cloud of dust, with nothing on but his fig-leaf, it would have seemed to me all right and harmonious.
Do you remember Charles the First?—his broad slouch with the plume in it? His tall and slender figure? His body dressed in a velvet doublet with lace sleeves, his legs in leather, a long rapier at his side, and spurs on his heels? I ran into him at the next corner, and recognized him instantly—just as well as I would recognize the Grand Chain in the Mississippi if I saw it from the pilot house after all these years. He bent his body and gave his hat a sweep that brought its plume almost to the ground, welcoming me warmly. This king has been criticized a lot; I’ll understand him better moving forward and will regret him more than I have in the last fifty or sixty years. He did some things in his time that would have been better left undone, things that have cast a shadow over his name—we all know this, we all agree—but our mistake has been calling them crimes when they were really just indiscretions. At every few steps, I met famous figures I had never encountered outside of paintings, statues, and history, and these were thrilling and delightful encounters. I shook hands with Henry the Second, who hadn’t been seen in Oxford streets for almost eight hundred years; and with the Fair Rosamond, whom I now believe was chaste and blameless, despite my previous thoughts; and with[Pg 173] Shakespeare, one of the nicest foreigners I've ever met; and with Roger Bacon; and with Queen Elizabeth, who talked for five minutes without swearing—even this gave me a better opinion of her and made me forgive her for possibly beheading Scottish Mary, which I now doubt; and I also met the quaintly and anciently dressed young King Harold Harefoot, from nearly nine hundred years ago, who zoomed by on a bicycle, smoking a pipe, but immediately stopped to shake my hand; and I encountered a bishop who had lost his way because it was the first time he had been inside the walls of Oxford in about twelve hundred years. By that point, I had gotten so used to the erased ages and their most notable figures that if I had met Adam, I wouldn’t have been surprised or embarrassed; if he had come in a racing car, clouds of dust swirling, wearing nothing but his fig leaf, it would have all seemed perfectly fine and fitting.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
(To be Continued.)
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXIV.
BY MARK TWAIN.
From Susy's Biography of Me [1885-6].
From Susy's Bio of Me [1885-6].
Mamma and papa have returned from Onteora and they have had a delightful visit. Mr. Frank Stockton was down in Virginia and could not reach Onteora in time, so they did not see him, and Mrs. Mary Mapes Dodge was ill and couldn't go to Onteora, but Mrs. General Custer was there, and mamma said that she was a very attractive, sweet appearing woman.
Mom and Dad have returned from Onteora, and they had a great visit. Mr. Frank Stockton was in Virginia and couldn't get to Onteora on time, so they missed seeing him. Mrs. Mary Mapes Dodge was ill and couldn't attend Onteora, but Mrs. General Custer was there, and Mom said she was a really attractive, sweet-looking woman.
[Dictated October 9, 1906.] Onteora was situated high up in the Catskill Mountains, in the centre of a far-reaching solitude. I do not mean that the region was wholly uninhabited; there were farmhouses here and there, at generous distances apart. Their occupants were descendants of ancestors who had built the houses in Rip Van Winkle's time, or earlier; and those ancestors were not more primitive than were this posterity of theirs. The city people were as foreign and unfamiliar and strange to them as monkeys would have been, and they would have respected the monkeys as much as they respected these elegant summer-resorters. The resorters were a puzzle to them, their ways were so strange and their interests so trivial. They drove the resorters over the mountain roads and listened in shamed surprise at their bursts of enthusiasm over the scenery. The farmers had had that[Pg 328] scenery on exhibition from their mountain roosts all their lives, and had never noticed anything remarkable about it. By way of an incident: a pair of these primitives were overheard chatting about the resorters, one day, and in the course of their talk this remark was dropped:
[Dictated October 9, 1906.] Onteora was located high in the Catskill Mountains, in the middle of a vast loneliness. I don't mean the area was completely uninhabited; there were farmhouses scattered around, spaced quite far apart. The people living there were descendants of those who built the houses back in Rip Van Winkle's time or even earlier; and those ancestors were no more primitive than their descendants today. The city folks seemed as foreign and strange to them as monkeys might have been, and they would have regarded the monkeys with as much respect as they did these sophisticated summer tourists. The tourists were a mystery to them; their habits were so odd, and their interests felt so trivial. The farmers drove the tourists along the mountain roads and listened with embarrassed surprise to their excitement over the landscape. The farmers had viewed that[Pg 328] scenery from their mountain homes their whole lives and had never thought it remarkable. As an interesting note: a couple of these locals were overheard discussing the tourists one day, and during their conversation, one of them made this comment:
"I was a-drivin' a passel of 'em round about yisterday evenin', quiet ones, you know, still and solemn, and all to wunst they busted out to make your hair lift and I judged hell was to pay. Now what do you reckon it was? It wa'n't anything but jest one of them common damned yaller sunsets."
"I was driving a bunch of them around yesterday evening, quiet ones, you know, still and solemn, and all of a sudden they burst out and it felt like my hair was standing on end, and I thought we were in for it. Now, what do you think it was? It wasn’t anything but just one of those common damn yellow sunsets."
In those days—
Back then—
[Tuesday, October 16, 1906.] ... Warner is gone. Stockton is gone. I attended both funerals. Warner was a near neighbor, from the autumn of '71 until his death, nineteen years afterward. It is not the privilege of the most of us to have many intimate friends—a dozen is our aggregate—but I think he could count his by the score. It is seldom that a man is so beloved by both sexes and all ages as Warner was. There was a charm about his spirit, and his ways, and his words, that won all that came within the sphere of its influence. Our children adopted him while they were little creatures, and thenceforth, to the end, he was "Cousin Charley" to them. He was "Uncle Charley" to the children of more than one other friend. Mrs. Clemens was very fond of him, and he always called her by her first name—shortened. Warner died, as she died, and as I would die—without premonition, without a moment's warning.
[Tuesday, October 16, 1906.] ... Warner is gone. Stockton is gone. I attended both funerals. Warner was a nearby neighbor, from the fall of '71 until his death, nineteen years later. Most of us don't have many close friends—a dozen is about our limit—but I think he could count his by the scores. It's rare for someone to be so loved by both men and women of all ages as Warner was. There was something special about his spirit, his manner, and his words that enchanted everyone who came into contact with him. Our kids took to him when they were little, and from then on, he was "Cousin Charley" to them. He was "Uncle Charley" to the children of more than one other friend. Mrs. Clemens was very fond of him, and he always called her by her shortened first name. Warner passed away, just like she did, and like I will—without any warning, with no premonition.
Uncle Remus still lives, and must be over a thousand years old. Indeed, I know that this must be so, because I have seen a new photograph of him in the public prints within the last month or so, and in that picture his aspects are distinctly and strikingly geological, and one can see he is thinking about the mastodons and plesiosaurians that he used to play with when he was young.
Uncle Remus is still around and must be over a thousand years old. I know this is true because I came across a recent photograph of him in the news within the last month, and in that picture, his features look very ancient, and you can tell he’s reminiscing about the mastodons and plesiosaurs he played with when he was younger.
It is just a quarter of a century since I have seen Uncle Remus. He visited us in our home in Hartford and was reverently devoured by the big eyes of Susy and Clara, for I made a deep and awful impression upon the little creatures—who knew his book by heart through my nightly declamation of its tales to them—by revealing to them privately that he was the real Uncle Remus whitewashed so that he could come into people's houses the front way.
It’s been just 25 years since I last saw Uncle Remus. He came to visit us at our home in Hartford, and Susy and Clara were completely captivated by him. I made a strong and unforgettable impression on the little girls—who knew his book by heart because I read the stories to them every night—by letting them in on the secret that he was the real Uncle Remus, cleaned up so he could come into people’s homes through the front door.
[Pg 329]He was the bashfulest grown person I have ever met. When there were people about he stayed silent, and seemed to suffer until they were gone. But he was lovely, nevertheless; for the sweetness and benignity of the immortal Remus looked out from his eyes, and the graces and sincerities of his character shone in his face.
[Pg 329]He was the shyest adult I have ever met. When there were people around, he remained quiet and seemed to struggle until they left. But he was wonderful, nonetheless; the kindness and goodness of the eternal Remus shone from his eyes, and the charm and honesty of his character radiated from his face.
It may be that Jim Wolf was as bashful as Harris. It hardly seems possible, yet as I look back fifty-six years and consider Jim Wolf, I am almost persuaded that he was. He was our long slim apprentice in my brother's printing-office in Hannibal. He was seventeen, and yet he was as much as four times as bashful as I was, though I was only fourteen. He boarded and slept in the house, but he was always tongue-tied in the presence of my sister, and when even my gentle mother spoke to him he could not answer save in frightened monosyllables. He would not enter a room where a girl was; nothing could persuade him to do such a thing. Once when he was in our small parlor alone, two majestic old maids entered and seated themselves in such a way that Jim could not escape without passing by them. He would as soon have thought of passing by one of Harris's plesiosaurians ninety feet long. I came in presently, was charmed with the situation, and sat down in a corner to watch Jim suffer, and enjoy it. My mother followed a minute later and sat down with the visitors and began to talk. Jim sat upright in his chair, and during a quarter of an hour he did not change his position by a shade—neither General Grant nor a bronze image could have maintained that immovable pose more successfully. I mean as to body and limbs; with the face there was a difference. By fleeting revealments of the face I saw that something was happening—something out of the common. There would be a sudden twitch of the muscles of the face, an instant distortion, which in the next instant had passed and left no trace. These twitches gradually grew in frequency, but no muscle outside of the face lost any of its rigidity, or betrayed any interest in what was happening to Jim. I mean if something was happening to him, and I knew perfectly well that that was the case. At last a pair of tears began to swim slowly down his cheeks amongst the twitchings, but Jim sat still and let them run; then I saw his right hand steal along his thigh until half-way to his knee, then take a vigorous grip upon the cloth.
It might be that Jim Wolf was just as shy as Harris. It hardly seems likely, yet looking back fifty-six years and thinking about Jim Wolf, I’m almost convinced he was. He was our tall, slim apprentice at my brother's printing shop in Hannibal. He was seventeen, but he was at least four times as shy as I was, even though I was only fourteen. He lived and slept in our house, but he was always at a loss for words around my sister, and even when my gentle mother spoke to him, he could only respond in frightened monosyllables. He wouldn’t enter a room where a girl was present; nothing could convince him to do that. Once, when he was alone in our small parlor, two dignified old maids came in and sat down in such a way that Jim couldn't leave without walking right by them. He would have just as soon tried to pass by one of Harris’s ninety-foot-long plesiosaurs. I came in a little while later, amused by the situation, and sat down in a corner to watch Jim squirm and enjoy it. My mother followed shortly after, joined the visitors, and started chatting. Jim sat up straight in his chair, and for a good fifteen minutes, he didn’t budge an inch—not even General Grant or a bronze statue could have held that stiff pose better. I mean in terms of his body and limbs; the face was a different story. By small hints in his expression, I could tell something unusual was happening. There would be sudden twitches of the facial muscles, a brief grimace, which would disappear in an instant, leaving no trace. These twitches gradually increased in frequency, but no other part of his body showed any sign of relaxation or interest in what was happening to Jim. I mean if something was happening to him, and I knew perfectly well that it was. Eventually, a couple of tears began to slowly trickle down his cheeks amidst the twitches, but Jim remained still and let them fall; then I saw his right hand creep along his thigh until it was halfway to his knee, then take a firm grip on the fabric.
[Pg 330]That was a wasp that he was grabbing! A colony of them were climbing up his legs and prospecting around, and every time he winced they stabbed him to the hilt—so for a quarter of an hour one group of excursionists after another climbed up Jim's legs and resented even the slightest wince or squirm that he indulged himself with, in his misery. When the entertainment had become nearly unbearable, he conceived the idea of gripping them between his fingers and putting them out of commission. He succeeded with many of them, but at great cost, for, as he couldn't see the wasp, he was as likely to take hold of the wrong end of him as he was the right; then the dying wasp gave him a punch to remember the incident by.
[Pg 330]That was a wasp he was trying to grab! A bunch of them were climbing up his legs and exploring around, and every time he flinched, they stung him hard—so for about fifteen minutes, one group of these pests after another crawled up Jim's legs and didn’t take kindly to even the slightest flinch or squirm he made in his discomfort. When the situation became almost unbearable, he thought about pinching them between his fingers to take them out of the game. He managed to catch quite a few, but it came at a cost, because since he couldn’t see the wasps, he was just as likely to grab the wrong part of them as the right; then the dying wasp made sure he got a sting to remember it by.
If those ladies had stayed all day, and if all the wasps in Missouri had come and climbed up Jim's legs, nobody there would ever have known it but Jim and the wasps and me. There he would have sat until the ladies left.
If those ladies had stayed all day, and if all the wasps in Missouri had come and crawled up Jim's legs, nobody there would have ever known it except for Jim, the wasps, and me. He would have just sat there until the ladies left.
When they finally went away we went up-stairs and he took his clothes off, and his legs were a picture to look at. They looked as if they were mailed all over with shirt buttons, each with a single red hole in the centre. The pain was intolerable—no, would have been intolerable, but the pain of the presence of those ladies had been so much harder to bear that the pain of the wasps' stings was quite pleasant and enjoyable by comparison.
When they finally left, we went upstairs, and he took off his clothes. His legs were something to see. They looked like they were covered in shirt buttons, each with a single red dot in the middle. The pain was unbearable—no, it would have been unbearable, but the discomfort of having those ladies around was so much worse that the pain from the wasps' stings felt almost nice in comparison.
Jim never could enjoy wasps. I remember once—
Jim never could enjoy wasps. I remember once—
From Susy's Biography of Me [1885-6].
From Susy's Bio of Me [1885-6].
Mamma has given me a very pleasant little newspaper scrap about papa, to copy. I will put it in here.
Mom gave me a nice little newspaper clipping about Dad to copy. I’ll include it here.
[Thursday, October 11, 1906.] It was a rather strong compliment; I think I will leave it out. It was from James Redpath.
[Thursday, October 11, 1906.] It was quite a flattering remark; I think I will skip it. It came from James Redpath.
The chief ingredients of Redpath's make-up were honesty, sincerity, kindliness, and pluck. He wasn't afraid. He was one of Ossawatomie Brown's right-hand men in the bleeding Kansas days; he was all through that struggle. He carried his life in his hands, and from one day to another it wasn't worth the price of a night's lodging. He had a small body of daring men under him, and they were constantly being hunted by the "jayhawkers," who were proslavery Missourians, guerillas, modern free lances.
The main qualities in Redpath's character were honesty, sincerity, kindness, and bravery. He wasn't scared. He was one of Ossawatomie Brown's key supporters during the violent times in Kansas; he was involved throughout that conflict. He lived with constant danger, and each day, his life was worth less than the cost of a place to sleep. He had a small group of courageous men under his command, and they were always being pursued by the "jayhawkers," who were pro-slavery Missourians, guerrillas, and modern-day freelancers.
[Friday, October 12, 1906.] ... I can't think of the name of that daredevil guerilla who led the jayhawkers and chased[Pg 331] Redpath up and down the country, and, in turn, was chased by Redpath. By grace of the chances of war, the two men never met in the field, though they several times came within an ace of it.
[Friday, October 12, 1906.] ... I can't remember the name of that fearless guerrilla who led the jayhawkers and chased[Pg 331] Redpath all over the place, and, in turn, was chased by Redpath. By some twist of fate, the two men never encountered each other in battle, even though they came very close several times.
Ten or twelve years later, Redpath was earning his living in Boston as chief of the lecture business in the United States. Fifteen or sixteen years after his Kansas adventures I became a public lecturer, and he was my agent. Along there somewhere was a press dinner, one November night, at the Tremont Hotel in Boston, and I attended it. I sat near the head of the table, with Redpath between me and the chairman; a stranger sat on my other side. I tried several times to talk with the stranger, but he seemed to be out of words and I presently ceased from troubling him. He was manifestly a very shy man, and, moreover, he might have been losing sleep the night before.
Ten or twelve years later, Redpath was making a living in Boston as the head of the lecture business in the United States. Fifteen or sixteen years after his adventures in Kansas, I became a public speaker, and he was my agent. At some point during that time, there was a press dinner one November night at the Tremont Hotel in Boston, which I attended. I sat near the head of the table, with Redpath between me and the chairman; a stranger was on my other side. I tried talking to the stranger a few times, but he seemed at a loss for words, so I eventually gave up. He was clearly a very shy guy, and he might have also been short on sleep from the night before.
The first man called up was Redpath. At the mention of the name the stranger started, and showed interest. He fixed a fascinated eye on Redpath, and lost not a word of his speech. Redpath told some stirring incidents of his career in Kansas, and said, among other things:
The first person called up was Redpath. When the stranger heard his name, he perked up and showed interest. He fixed his gaze on Redpath, hanging on every word he said. Redpath shared some exciting stories from his time in Kansas and mentioned, among other things:
"Three times I came near capturing the gallant jayhawker chief, and once he actually captured me, but didn't know me and let me go, because he said he was hot on Redpath's trail and couldn't afford to waste time and rope on inconsequential small fry."
"Three times I almost caught the brave jayhawker leader, and once he actually caught me, but he didn't recognize me and let me go because he said he was focused on Redpath's trail and couldn't waste time and rope on insignificant little guys."
My stranger was called up next, and when Redpath heard his name he, in turn, showed a startled interest. The stranger said, bending a caressing glance upon Redpath and speaking gently—I may even say sweetly:
My stranger was called up next, and when Redpath heard his name, he showed a surprised interest. The stranger said, giving Redpath a soft, affectionate look and speaking gently—I might even say sweetly:
"You realize that I was that jayhawker chief. I am glad to know you now and take you to my heart and call you friend"—then he added, in a voice that was pathetic with regret, "but if I had only known you then, what tumultuous happiness I should have had in your society!—while it lasted."
"You realize that I was that jayhawker leader. I'm really glad to know you now and welcome you into my heart and call you a friend"—then he added, in a voice filled with regret, "but if I had only known you back then, what amazing happiness I would have had in your company!—while it lasted."
The last quarter of a century of my life has been pretty constantly and faithfully devoted to the study of the human race—that is to say, the study of myself, for, in my individual person, I am the entire human race compacted together. I have found that then is no ingredient of the race which I do not possess in either a small way or a large way. When it is small, as compared with the same ingredient in somebody else, there is still enough of it[Pg 332] for all the purposes of examination. In my contacts with the species I find no one who possesses a quality which I do not possess. The shades of difference between other people and me serve to make variety and prevent monotony, but that is all; broadly speaking, we are all alike; and so by studying myself carefully and comparing myself with other people, and noting the divergences, I have been enabled to acquire a knowledge of the human race which I perceive is more accurate and more comprehensive than that which has been acquired and revealed by any other member of our species. As a result, my private and concealed opinion of myself is not of a complimentary sort. It follows that my estimate of the human race is the duplicate of my estimate of myself.
The last twenty-five years of my life have been pretty much all about studying humanity—that is, studying myself, since I see my individual self as a representation of the whole human race. I've realized that I have every trait of our species, either in a small amount or a large one. When it’s small compared to someone else’s, it’s still enough for me to examine. In my interactions with others, I find no quality that I don’t also have. The slight differences among people create variety and prevent boredom, but that’s about it; broadly speaking, we’re all the same. So, by studying myself closely and comparing myself to others, taking note of the differences, I’ve gained an understanding of humanity that I believe is more accurate and comprehensive than what any other person has achieved. As a result, my private and hidden opinion of myself isn’t very flattering. This means my view of humanity is simply a reflection of how I see myself.
I am not proposing to discuss all of the peculiarities of the human race, at this time; I only wish to touch lightly upon one or two of them. To begin with, I wonder why a man should prefer a good billiard-table to a poor one; and why he should prefer straight cues to crooked ones; and why he should prefer round balls to chipped ones; and why he should prefer a level table to one that slants; and why he should prefer responsive cushions to the dull and unresponsive kind. I wonder at these things, because when we examine the matter we find that the essentials involved in billiards are as competently and exhaustively furnished by a bad billiard outfit as they are by the best one. One of the essentials is amusement. Very well, if there is any more amusement to be gotten out of the one outfit than out of the other, the facts are in favor of the bad outfit. The bad outfit will always furnish thirty per cent. more fun for the players and for the spectators than will the good outfit. Another essential of the game is that the outfit shall give the players full opportunity to exercise their best skill, and display it in a way to compel the admiration of the spectators. Very well, the bad outfit is nothing behind the good one in this regard. It is a difficult matter to estimate correctly the eccentricities of chipped balls and a slanting table, and make the right allowance for them and secure a count; the finest kind of skill is required to accomplish the satisfactory result. Another essential of the game is that it shall add to the interest of the game by furnishing opportunities to bet. Very well, in this regard no good outfit can claim any advantage over a bad one. I know, by experience, that a bad outfit is as[Pg 333] valuable as the best one; that an outfit that couldn't be sold at auction for seven dollars is just as valuable for all the essentials of the game as an outfit that is worth a thousand.
I’m not planning to go into all the quirks of humanity right now; I just want to lightly touch on a couple of them. First off, I wonder why a guy would choose a nice billiard table over a shabby one; why he prefers straight cues to crooked ones; why he likes round balls instead of chipped ones; why he goes for a level table rather than one that’s slanted; and why he favors responsive cushions over dull, unresponsive ones. I find these things interesting because when we break it down, we see that a bad billiard setup provides the same essentials as the best one. One essential is fun. If there’s any more fun to be had from one setup than the other, the facts actually favor the bad setup. The bad setup will always deliver about thirty percent more fun for the players and the audience than the good one. Another essential is that the setup should give players the chance to show off their best skills, impressing the spectators. In this area, the bad setup is just as good as the good one. It can be tricky to accurately gauge the quirks of chipped balls and a slanted table, adjusting for them to get a score; it takes top-notch skill to achieve a satisfactory result. Another essential is that the game should be more interesting by providing chances to place bets. Here, no good setup has an edge over a bad one. From my experience, I know that a bad setup is just as valuable as the best one; that a setup you couldn’t sell for seven dollars is just as good for all the essentials of the game as one worth a thousand.
I acquired some of this learning in Jackass Gulch, California, more than forty years ago. Jackass Gulch had once been a rich and thriving surface-mining camp. By and by its gold deposits were exhausted; then the people began to go away, and the town began to decay, and rapidly; in my time it had disappeared. Where the bank, and the city hall, and the church, and the gambling-dens, and the newspaper office, and the streets of brick blocks had been, was nothing now but a wide and beautiful expanse of green grass, a peaceful and charming solitude. Half a dozen scattered dwellings were still inhabited, and there was still one saloon of a ruined and rickety character struggling for life, but doomed. In its bar was a billiard outfit that was the counterpart of the one in my father-in-law's garret. The balls were chipped, the cloth was darned and patched, the table's surface was undulating, and the cues were headless and had the curve of a parenthesis—but the forlorn remnant of marooned miners played games there, and those games were more entertaining to look at than a circus and a grand opera combined. Nothing but a quite extraordinary skill could score a carom on that table—a skill that required the nicest estimate of force, distance, and how much to allow for the various slants of the table and the other formidable peculiarities and idiosyncrasies furnished by the contradictions of the outfit. Last winter, here in New York, I saw Hoppe and Schaefer and Sutton and the three or four other billiard champions of world-wide fame contend against each other, and certainly the art and science displayed were a wonder to see; yet I saw nothing there in the way of science and art that was more wonderful than shots which I had seen Texas Tom make on the wavy surface of that poor old wreck in the perishing saloon at Jackass Gulch forty years before. Once I saw Texas Tom make a string of seven points on a single inning!—all calculated shots, and not a fluke or a scratch among them. I often saw him make runs of four, but when he made his great string of seven, the boys went wild with enthusiasm and admiration. The joy and the noise exceeded that which the great gathering at Madison Square produced when Sutton scored five hundred points at the eighteen-inch game, on a world-famous night last winter. With practice, that champion[Pg 334] could score nineteen or twenty on the Jackass Gulch table; but to start with, Texas Tom would show him miracles that would astonish him; also it might have another handsome result: it might persuade the great experts to discard their own trifling game and bring the Jackass Gulch outfit here and exhibit their skill in a game worth a hundred of the discarded one, for profound and breathless interest, and for displays of almost superhuman skill.
I gained some of this knowledge in Jackass Gulch, California, more than forty years ago. Jackass Gulch used to be a bustling and prosperous surface-mining camp. Eventually, the gold ran out; then people started leaving, and the town quickly fell into decline; by my time, it had vanished. Where the bank, city hall, church, gambling dens, newspaper office, and brick streets once stood, there was now nothing but a vast and beautiful stretch of green grass, a peaceful and charming solitude. A few scattered homes were still occupied, and there was one rundown saloon barely hanging on, but it was doomed. Inside, the bar had a billiard table that looked just like the one in my father-in-law's attic. The balls were chipped, the cloth was patched, the table surface was uneven, and the cues were headless and curved like parentheses—but the forlorn remnant of stranded miners played games there, and those games were more entertaining to watch than a circus and a grand opera combined. Only an extraordinary skill could score a carom on that table—a skill that required precise judgment of force, distance, and how much to account for the various slopes of the table and the other unique quirks of the setup. Last winter, here in New York, I watched Hoppe, Schaefer, Sutton, and a few other world-famous billiard champions compete against one another, and the art and science they showed were amazing; yet I witnessed nothing there in terms of skill and artistry that was more impressive than the shots I saw Texas Tom make on the uneven surface of that poor old table in the crumbling saloon at Jackass Gulch forty years earlier. Once, I saw Texas Tom score seven points in a single inning!—all calculated shots, without a fluke or a scratch among them. I often saw him score four, but when he made that impressive string of seven, the crowd went wild with excitement and admiration. The joy and noise surpassed what the massive audience at Madison Square produced when Sutton scored five hundred points in the eighteen-inch game on that famous night last winter. With practice, that champion[Pg 334] could score nineteen or twenty on the Jackass Gulch table; but initially, Texas Tom would show him tricks that would blow his mind. It might also have another beneficial outcome: it could persuade the great experts to forget their trivial game and bring the Jackass Gulch setup here, showcasing their skills in a game that was far more engaging and filled with displays of almost superhuman talent.
In my experience, games played with a fiendish outfit furnish ecstasies of delight which games played with the other kind cannot match. Twenty-seven years ago my budding little family spent the summer at Bateman's Point, near Newport, Rhode Island. It was a comfortable boarding-place, well stocked with sweet mothers and little children, but the male sex was scarce; however, there was another young fellow besides myself, and he and I had good times—Higgins was his name, but that was not his fault. He was a very pleasant and companionable person. On the premises there was what had once been a bowling-alley. It was a single alley, and it was estimated that it had been out of repair for sixty years—but not the balls, the balls were in good condition; there were forty-one of them, and they ranged in size from a grapefruit up to a lignum-vitæ sphere that you could hardly lift. Higgins and I played on that alley day after day. At first, one of us located himself at the bottom end to set up the pins in case anything should happen to them, but nothing happened. The surface of that alley consisted of a rolling stretch of elevations and depressions, and neither of us could, by any art known to us, persuade a ball to stay on the alley until it should accomplish something. Little balls and big, the same thing always happened—the ball left the alley before it was half-way home and went thundering down alongside of it the rest of the way and made the gamekeeper climb out and take care of himself. No matter, we persevered, and were rewarded. We examined the alley, noted and located a lot of its peculiarities, and little by little we learned how to deliver a ball in such a way that it would travel home and knock down a pin or two. By and by we succeeded in improving our game to a point where we were able to get all of the pins with thirty-five balls—so we made it a thirty-five-ball game. If the player did not succeed with thirty-five, he had lost the game. I suppose that all the balls, taken together, weighed five hundred pounds, or maybe a ton—or along there[Pg 335] somewhere—but anyway it was hot weather, and by the time that a player had sent thirty-five of them home he was in a drench of perspiration, and physically exhausted.
In my experience, games played with a tricky setup provide a level of enjoyment that other games just can’t match. Twenty-seven years ago, my young family spent the summer at Bateman's Point, near Newport, Rhode Island. It was a cozy boarding place, filled with kind mothers and little kids, but there weren’t many men around; however, there was another young guy besides me, and we had a great time—his name was Higgins, but that wasn’t his fault. He was a really nice and friendly person. On the property, there was what used to be a bowling alley. It was a single lane and had been out of commission for sixty years—but not the balls; those were in good shape. There were forty-one of them, ranging in size from a grapefruit to a heavy lignum-vitæ sphere that was hard to lift. Higgins and I played on that lane day after day. At first, one of us would stand at the end to set up the pins if they got knocked down, but nothing ever happened. The surface of that lane was a bumpy stretch, with hills and dips, and neither of us could, by any technique we knew, keep a ball on the lane long enough for it to do anything. Whether they were small or large, the same thing always happened—the ball would leave the lane before it reached halfway and thunder down the side, making the groundskeeper have to come out and sort it out. No matter, we didn’t give up and were rewarded for our persistence. We studied the lane, noted many of its quirks, and gradually learned how to roll a ball so it would travel the length and knock down a pin or two. Eventually, we got our game to a point where we could take down all the pins with thirty-five balls, so we made it a thirty-five-ball game. If the player couldn’t do it with thirty-five, they lost the game. I guess all the balls together weighed about five hundred pounds or maybe a ton—or somewhere around there[Pg 335]—but anyway, it was hot weather, and by the time a player had rolled thirty-five of them, they were drenched in sweat and completely worn out.
Next, we started cocked hat—that is to say, a triangle of three pins, the other seven being discarded. In this game we used the three smallest balls and kept on delivering them until we got the three pins down. After a day or two of practice we were able to get the chief pin with an output of four balls, but it cost us a great many deliveries to get the other two; but by and by we succeeded in perfecting our art—at least we perfected it to our limit. We reached a scientific excellence where we could get the three pins down with twelve deliveries of the three small balls, making thirty-six shots to conquer the cocked hat.
Next, we started playing cocked hat—that is, a triangle of three pins, while discarding the other seven. In this game, we used the three smallest balls and kept throwing them until we knocked down all three pins. After a day or two of practice, we managed to knock down the main pin using four balls, but it took us a lot of throws to get the other two. Eventually, we improved our skills—at least we brought them up to our best. We reached a point where we could knock down all three pins with twelve throws of the three small balls, making a total of thirty-six shots to take down the cocked hat.
Having reached our limit for daylight work, we set up a couple of candles and played at night. As the alley was fifty or sixty feet long, we couldn't see the pins, but the candles indicated their locality. We continued this game until we were able to knock down the invisible pins with thirty-six shots. Having now reached the limit of the candle game, we changed and played it left-handed. We continued the left-handed game until we conquered its limit, which was fifty-four shots. Sometimes we sent down a succession of fifteen balls without getting anything at all. We easily got out of that old alley five times the fun that anybody could have gotten out of the best alley in New York.
Having reached our limit for working in the daylight, we set up a couple of candles and played at night. The alley was about fifty or sixty feet long, so we couldn't see the pins, but the candles helped us know where they were. We kept playing this game until we knocked down the invisible pins with thirty-six shots. Once we reached the limit of the candle game, we switched it up and played left-handed. We continued the left-handed game until we conquered that limit, which was fifty-four shots. Sometimes, we rolled down a series of fifteen balls without hitting anything at all. We easily had five times the fun in that old alley compared to what anyone could have in the best alley in New York.
One blazing hot day, a modest and courteous officer of the regular army appeared in our den and introduced himself. He was about thirty-five years old, well built and militarily erect and straight, and he was hermetically sealed up in the uniform of that ignorant old day—a uniform made of heavy material, and much properer for January than July. When he saw the venerable alley, and glanced from that to the long procession of shining balls in the trough, his eye lit with desire, and we judged that he was our meat. We politely invited him to take a hand, and he could not conceal his gratitude; though his breeding, and the etiquette of his profession, made him try. We explained the game to him, and said that there were forty-one balls, and that the player was privileged to extend his inning and keep on playing until he had used them all up—repeatedly—and that for every ten-strike he got a prize. We didn't name the prize—it wasn't necessary, as no prize would ever be needed or called for. He[Pg 336] started a sarcastic smile, but quenched it, according to the etiquette of his profession. He merely remarked that he would like to select a couple of medium balls and one small one, adding that he didn't think he would need the rest.
One blazing hot day, a humble and polite officer from the regular army appeared in our hangout and introduced himself. He was about thirty-five, well-built, and stood straight and tall like a soldier, completely sealed up in the heavy uniform that was more suited for January than July. When he saw the old alley and glanced at the long line of shiny balls in the trough, his eyes brightened with excitement, and we figured he was our target. We politely invited him to join the game, and he couldn’t hide his appreciation; though he tried, his upbringing and the etiquette of his job made it difficult. We explained the game to him, mentioning that there were forty-one balls and that the player could extend their turn and keep playing until they used them all up—multiple times—and that for every ten-strike, there was a prize. We didn’t mention what the prize was—it wasn’t necessary since no prize would ever be needed or requested. He started to smile sarcastically but quickly suppressed it, in line with his professional decorum. He simply said that he’d like to choose a couple of medium balls and one small one, adding that he didn’t think he would need the rest.
Then he began, and he was an astonished man. He couldn't get a ball to stay on the alley. When he had fired about fifteen balls and hadn't yet reached the cluster of pins, his annoyance began to show out through his clothes. He wouldn't let it show in his face; but after another fifteen balls he was not able to control his face; he didn't utter a word, but he exuded mute blasphemy from every pore. He asked permission to take off his coat, which was granted; then he turned himself loose, with bitter determination, and although he was only an infantry officer he could have been mistaken for a battery, he got up such a volleying thunder with those balls. Presently he removed his cravat; after a little he took off his vest; and still he went bravely on. Higgins was suffocating. My condition was the same, but it would not be courteous to laugh; it would be better to burst, and we came near it. That officer was good pluck. He stood to his work without uttering a word, and kept the balls going until he had expended the outfit four times, making four times forty-one shots; then he had to give it up, and he did; for he was no longer able to stand without wobbling. He put on his clothes, bade us a courteous good-by, invited us to call at the Fort, and started away. Then he came back, and said,
Then he started, and he was a shocked man. He couldn’t keep a ball on the lane. After launching about fifteen balls without hitting the pins, his frustration started to show through his clothes. He wouldn’t let it show on his face; but after another fifteen balls, he couldn’t control his expression anymore; he didn’t say a word, but he radiated silent anger from every pore. He asked to take off his coat, which was allowed; then he let loose with bitter determination, and even though he was just an infantry officer, he could’ve been confused for a cannon with the racket he made with those balls. Eventually, he took off his tie; after a while, he removed his vest; and he kept going strong. Higgins was on the verge of suffocating. I felt the same way, but it wouldn’t be polite to laugh; it would have been better to burst, and we came close. That officer had real guts. He stuck to it without saying a word and kept the balls rolling until he had gone through the whole set four times, making four sets of forty-one shots; then he had to give up, and he did; he could no longer stand without wobbling. He put his clothes back on, said a polite goodbye, invited us to visit the Fort, and started to leave. Then he came back and said,
"What is the prize for the ten-strike?"
"What do you get for a ten-strike?"
We had to confess that we had not selected it yet.
We had to admit that we hadn’t chosen it yet.
He said, gravely, that he thought there was no occasion for hurry about it.
He said seriously that he thought there was no reason to rush it.
I believe Bateman's alley was a better one than any other in America, in the matter of the essentials of the game. It compelled skill; it provided opportunity for bets; and if you could get a stranger to do the bowling for you, there was more and wholesomer and delightfuler entertainment to be gotten out of his industries than out of the finest game by the best expert, and played upon the best alley elsewhere in existence.
I think Bateman's alley was better than any other in America when it came to the basics of the game. It required skill, offered chances for betting, and if you could get someone else to bowl for you, there was more enjoyable and wholesome entertainment to be had from that than from the best game played by the top expert on any other alley in the world.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
(To be Continued.)
To be continued.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DCXXV.
DECEMBER, 1907.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—XXV.
BY MARK TWAIN.
January 11, 1906. Answer to a letter received this morning:
January 11, 1906. Response to a letter I got this morning:
Dear Mrs. H.,—I am forever your debtor for reminding me of that curious passage in my life. During the first year or two after it happened, I could not bear to think of it. My pain and shame were so intense, and my sense of having been an imbecile so settled, established and confirmed, that I drove the episode entirely from my mind—and so all these twenty-eight or twenty-nine years I have lived in the conviction that my performance of that time was coarse, vulgar and destitute of humor. But your suggestion that you and your family found humor in it twenty-eight years ago moved me to look into the matter. So I commissioned a Boston typewriter to delve among the Boston papers of that bygone time and send me a copy of it.
Dear Mrs. H.,—I will always appreciate you for bringing back that odd moment in my life. For the first couple of years after it happened, I couldn’t stand to think about it. My pain and embarrassment were so intense, and my feeling of looking foolish was so strong that I completely buried the memory. So for the last twenty-eight or twenty-nine years, I’ve believed my performance during that time was awkward, crude, and completely lacking in humor. But your suggestion that you and your family found it funny back then made me rethink it. So, I rented a typewriter in Boston to look through the old Boston papers from that time and send me a copy.
It came this morning, and if there is any vulgarity about it I am[Pg 482] not able to discover it. If it isn't innocently and ridiculously funny, I am no judge. I will see to it that you get a copy.
It arrived this morning, and if there’s anything offensive in it, I can’t find it. If it’s not just pure and silly funny, then I don’t know what is. I’ll make sure you get a copy.
Address of Samuel L. Clemens ("Mark Twain")
From a report of the dinner given by the Publishers
of the Atlantic Monthly in honor of the
Seventieth Anniversary of the
Birth of John Greenleaf Whittier, at the Hotel Brunswick,
Boston, December 17, 1877,
as published in the
BOSTON EVENING TRANSCRIPT,
December 18, 1877Address of Samuel L. Clemens ("Mark Twain")
From a report of the dinner held by the Publishers
of the Atlantic Monthly in celebration of the
Seventieth Anniversary of the
Birth of John Greenleaf Whittier, at the Hotel Brunswick,
Boston, December 17, 1877,
as published in the
BOSTON EVENING TRANSCRIPT,
December 18, 1877Mr. Chairman—This is an occasion peculiarly meet for the digging up of pleasant reminiscences concerning literary folk; therefore I will drop lightly into history myself. Standing here on the shore of the Atlantic and contemplating certain of its largest literary billows, I am reminded of a thing which happened to me thirteen years ago, when I had just succeeded in stirring up a little Nevadian literary puddle myself, whose spume-flakes were beginning to blow thinly Californiawards. I started an inspection tramp through the southern mines of California. I was callow and conceited, and I resolved to try the virtue of my nom de guerre. I very soon had an opportunity. I knocked at a miner's lonely log cabin in the foothills of the Sierras just at nightfall. It was snowing at the time. A jaded, melancholy man of fifty, barefooted, opened the door to me. When he heard my nom de guerre he looked more dejected than before. He let me in—pretty reluctantly, I thought—and after the customary bacon and beans, black coffee and hot whiskey, I took a pipe. This sorrowful man had not said three words up to this time. Now he spoke up and said, in the voice of one who is secretly suffering, "You're the fourth—I'm going to move." "The fourth what!" said I. "The fourth littery man that has been here in twenty-four hours—I'm going to move." "You don't tell me!" said I; "who were the others!" "Mr. Longfellow, Mr. Emerson and Mr. Oliver Wendell Holmes—consound the lot!"
Mr. Chairman—This is a perfect time to share some fond memories about literary figures; so I'll share a bit of my own history. Standing here by the Atlantic and thinking about its biggest literary waves, I remember something that happened to me thirteen years ago when I had just stirred up a small literary scene in Nevada, which was starting to influence California. I began a journey through the southern mines of California. I was young and cocky, and I intended to test the power of my pen name. I quickly got my chance. I knocked on a miner's lonely log cabin in the Sierra foothills just as night was falling. It was snowing then. A tired, sad man in his fifties, barefoot, opened the door for me. When he heard my pen name, he looked even more miserable. He let me in—though reluctantly, as far as I could tell—and after the usual bacon and beans, black coffee, and hot whiskey, I lit a pipe. This sorrowful man hadn’t said more than three words until that point. Now he spoke up and said, in a voice filled with hidden pain, "You're the fourth—I'm going to move." "The fourth what!" I asked. "The fourth literary man to come here in twenty-four hours—I'm moving." "You don’t say!" I replied; "who were the others?" "Mr. Longfellow, Mr. Emerson, and Mr. Oliver Wendell Holmes—damn them all!"
You can easily believe I was interested. I supplicated—three hot whiskeys did the rest—and finally the melancholy miner began. Said he—
You can easily believe I was interested. I pleaded—three strong whiskeys did the trick—and finally the sad miner started. He said—
"They came here just at dark yesterday evening, and I let them in of course. Said they were going to the Yosemite. They were a rough lot, but that's nothing; everybody looks rough that travels afoot. Mr. Emerson was a seedy little bit of a chap, red-headed. Mr. Holmes as fat as a balloon; he weighed as much as three hundred, and double chins all the way down to his stomach. Mr. Longfellow built like a prize-fighter. His head was cropped and bristly, like as if he had a wig made of hair-brushes. His nose lay straight down his face, like a finger with the end joint tilted up. They had been drinking, I could see that. And what queer talk they used! Mr. Holmes inspected this cabin, then he took me by the buttonhole, and says he[Pg 483]—
"They arrived just after dark yesterday evening, and I let them in, of course. They said they were headed to Yosemite. They were a rough bunch, but that’s normal; everyone looks rough when they’re traveling on foot. Mr. Emerson was a scruffy little guy, red-headed. Mr. Holmes was as fat as a balloon; he weighed about three hundred pounds, with double chins all the way down to his stomach. Mr. Longfellow was built like a prizefighter. His hair was cropped and bristly, like he had a wig made of hairbrushes. His nose was straight down his face, like a finger with the tip tilted up. They had clearly been drinking. And what strange things they talked about! Mr. Holmes checked out this cabin, then he grabbed me by the buttonhole and said—[Pg 483]
"'Through the deep cares of thoughtI hear a voice that sings,Build thee more stately mansions,O my soul!'"Says I, 'I can't afford it, Mr. Holmes, and moreover I don't want to.' Blamed if I liked it pretty well, either, coming from a stranger, that way. However, I started to get out my bacon and beans, when Mr. Emerson came and looked on awhile, and then he takes me aside by the buttonhole and says—
"I said, 'I can't afford it, Mr. Holmes, and honestly, I don't want to.' Honestly, I didn’t really like it much either, especially coming from a stranger like that. Anyway, I started to pull out my bacon and beans when Mr. Emerson came over and watched for a bit, then he pulled me aside by the button and said—"
"'Give me agates for my meat;
Give me cantharids to eat;
From air and ocean bring me foods,
From all zones and altitudes.'"Says I, 'Mr. Emerson, if you'll excuse me, this ain't no hotel.' You see it sort of riled me—I warn't used to the ways of littery swells. But I went on a-sweating over my work, and next comes Mr. Longfellow and buttonholes me, and interrupts me. Says he,
"I said, 'Mr. Emerson, if you don't mind, this isn’t a hotel.' You see, it kind of annoyed me—I wasn’t used to the ways of fancy literary folks. But I kept working on my meal, and then Mr. Longfellow came up and interrupted me."
"'Honor be to Mudjekeewis!
You shall hear how Pau-Puk-Keewis—'"But I broke in, and says I, 'Beg your pardon, Mr. Longfellow, if you'll be so kind as to hold your yawp for about five minutes and let me get this grub ready, you'll do me proud.' Well, sir, after they'd filled up I set out the jug. Mr. Holmes looks at it and then he fires up all of a sudden and yells—
"But I jumped in and said, 'Excuse me, Mr. Longfellow, if you could kindly keep it down for about five minutes while I get this food ready, I’d really appreciate it.' Well, after they finished eating, I brought out the jug. Mr. Holmes looked at it, and then he suddenly got really excited and yelled—
"'Flash out a stream of blood-red wine!
For I would drink to other days.'"By George, I was getting kind of worked up. I don't deny it, I was getting kind of worked up. I turns to Mr. Holmes, and says I, 'Looky here, my fat friend, I'm a-running this shanty, and if the court knows herself, you'll take whiskey straight or you'll go dry.' Them's the very words I said to him. Now I don't want to sass such famous littery people, but you see they kind of forced me. There ain't nothing onreasonable 'bout me; I don't mind a passel of guests a-treadin' on my tail three or four times, but when it comes to standing on it it's different, 'and if the court knows herself,' I says, 'you'll take whiskey straight or you'll go dry.' Well, between drinks they'd swell around the cabin and strike attitudes and spout; and pretty soon they got out a greasy old deck and went to playing euchre at ten cents a corner—on trust. I began to notice some pretty suspicious things. Mr. Emerson dealt, looked at his hand, shook his head, says—
"Honestly, I was getting pretty worked up. I won’t deny it; I was really getting agitated. I turned to Mr. Holmes and said, 'Listen here, my hefty friend, I’m running this place, and if you know what's good for you, you’ll take your whiskey straight or you’ll go without.' Those are the exact words I said to him. Now, I don’t want to disrespect such respected literary figures, but they kind of pushed me into it. There’s nothing unreasonable about me; I don’t mind a whole bunch of guests stepping on my toes a few times, but when it comes to them actually standing on my feet, that’s a different story. And if you know what's what, I said, 'you’ll take your whiskey straight or you’ll go without.' Well, in between drinks, they lounged around the cabin, striking poses and reciting, and pretty soon they pulled out a greasy old deck of cards and started playing euchre for ten cents a hand—on credit. I began to notice some pretty sketchy stuff. Mr. Emerson dealt, looked at his hand, shook his head, and said—
"'I am the doubter and the doubt—'and ca'mly bunched the hands and went to shuffling for a new layout. Says he[Pg 484]—
and calmly collected the hands and started shuffling for a new round. He says[Pg 484]—
"'They reckon ill who leave me out;
They know not well the subtle ways I keep.
I pass and deal again!'Hang'd if he didn't go ahead and do it, too! O, he was a cool one! Well, in about a minute, things were running pretty tight, but all of a sudden I see by Mr. Emerson's eye he judged he had 'em. He had already corralled two tricks and each of the others one. So now he kind of lifts a little in his chair and says—
Can you believe he just went ahead and did it? Oh, he was smooth! Well, in about a minute, things were getting pretty tense, but suddenly I could tell by Mr. Emerson's eye that he thought he had them. He had already rounded up two tricks and each of the others had one. So now he leaned back in his chair and said—
"'I tire of globes and aces!—
Too long the game is played!'—and down he fetched a right bower. Mr. Longfellow smiles as sweet as pie and says—
—and down he brought a really good one. Mr. Longfellow smiles sweetly and says—
"'Thanks, thanks to thee, my worthy friend,
For the lesson thou hast taught,'—and blamed if he didn't down with another right bower! Emerson claps his hand on his bowie, Longfellow claps his on his revolver, and I went under a bunk. There was going to be trouble; but that monstrous Holmes rose up, wobbling his double chins, and says he, 'Order, gentlemen; the first man that draws, I'll lay down on him and smother him!' All quiet on the Potomac, you bet!
—and believe it or not, he didn’t go down with another right-hand man! Emerson puts his hand on his knife, Longfellow puts his on his gun, and I crawled under a bunk. There was definitely going to be trouble; but that big guy Holmes stood up, shaking his double chins, and said, 'Order, gentlemen; the first man who draws, I’ll take him down and smother him!' All quiet on the Potomac, you can bet!
"They were pretty how-come-you-so, by now, and they begun to blow. Emerson says, 'The nobbiest thing I ever wrote was Barbara Frietchie.' Says Longfellow, 'It don't begin with my Biglow Papers.' Says Holmes, 'My Thanatopsis lays over 'em both.' They mighty near ended in a fight. Then they wished they had some more company—and Mr. Emerson pointed to me and says—
"They were quite surprised by this, and they started to argue. Emerson said, 'The best thing I ever wrote was Barbara Frietchie.' Longfellow replied, 'It doesn't compare to my Biglow Papers.' Holmes chimed in, 'My Thanatopsis is better than both of those.' They were close to getting into a fight. Then they wished they had more people around—and Mr. Emerson pointed at me and said—
"'Is yonder squalid peasant all
That this proud nursery could breed?'He was a-whetting his bowie on his boot—so I let it pass. Well, sir, next they took it into their heads that they would like some music; so they made me stand up and sing 'When Johnny Comes Marching Home' till I dropped—at thirteen minutes past four this morning. That's what I've been through, my friend. When I woke at seven, they were leaving, thank goodness, and Mr. Longfellow had my only boots on, and his'n under his arm. Says I, 'Hold on, there, Evangeline, what are you going to do with them! He says, 'Going to make tracks with 'em; because—
He was sharpening his bowie knife on his boot—so I let it go. Well, they then decided they wanted some music; so they made me stand up and sing 'When Johnny Comes Marching Home' until I couldn't anymore—at thirteen minutes past four this morning. That's what I've been through, my friend. When I woke up at seven, they were finally leaving, thank goodness, and Mr. Longfellow had my only boots on, and his under his arm. I said, 'Hold on there, Evangeline, what are you going to do with those!' He replied, 'Going to make tracks with them; because—
"'Lives of great men all remind us
We can make our lives sublime;
And, departing, leave behind us
Footprints on the sands of time.'As I said, Mr. Twain, you are the fourth in twenty-four hours—and I'm going to move; I ain't suited to a littery atmosphere."
As I said, Mr. Twain, you're the fourth one in the last twenty-four hours—and I'm going to leave; I don't fit in a literary environment.
I said to the miner, "Why, my dear sir, these were not the gracious[Pg 485] singers to whom we and the world pay loving reverence and homage; these were impostors."
I said to the miner, "Why, my dear sir, these were not the gracious[Pg 485] singers that we and the world admire and honor; these were fakes."
The miner investigated me with a calm eye for a while; then said he, "Ah! impostors, were they? Are you?
The miner looked at me steadily for a bit; then he said, "Ah! impostors, were they? Are you?
I did not pursue the subject, and since then I have not travelled on my nom de guerre enough to hurt. Such was the reminiscence I was moved to contribute, Mr. Chairman. In my enthusiasm I may have exaggerated the details a little, but you will easily forgive me that fault, since I believe it is the first time I have ever deflected from perpendicular fact on an occasion like this.
I didn't follow up on the topic, and since then I haven't used my nom de guerre enough to cause any issues. That’s what I felt compelled to share, Mr. Chairman. In my excitement, I might have made some details a bit more dramatic than they were, but I hope you'll forgive me for that since it's the first time I've strayed from the absolute truth in a situation like this.
What I have said to Mrs. H. is true. I did suffer during a year or two from the deep humiliations of that episode. But at last, in 1888, in Venice, my wife and I came across Mr. and Mrs. A. P. C., of Concord, Massachusetts, and a friendship began then of the sort which nothing but death terminates. The C.'s were very bright people and in every way charming and companionable. We were together a month or two in Venice and several months in Rome, afterwards, and one day that lamented break of mine was mentioned. And when I was on the point of lathering those people for bringing it to my mind when I had gotten the memory of it almost squelched, I perceived with joy that the C.'s were indignant about the way that my performance had been received in Boston. They poured out their opinions most freely and frankly about the frosty attitude of the people who were present at that performance, and about the Boston newspapers for the position they had taken in regard to the matter. That position was that I had been irreverent beyond belief, beyond imagination. Very well, I had accepted that as a fact for a year or two, and had been thoroughly miserable about it whenever I thought of it—which was not frequently, if I could help it. Whenever I thought of it I wondered how I ever could have been inspired to do so unholy a thing. Well, the C.'s comforted me, but they did not persuade me to continue to think about the unhappy episode. I resisted that. I tried to get it out of my mind, and let it die, and I succeeded. Until Mrs. H.'s letter came, it had been a good twenty-five years since I had thought of that matter; and when she said that the thing was funny I wondered if possibly she might be right. At any rate, my curiosity was aroused, and I wrote to Boston and got the whole thing copied, as above set forth.
What I told Mrs. H. is true. I did struggle for a year or two with the deep embarrassment from that incident. But finally, in 1888, in Venice, my wife and I met Mr. and Mrs. A. P. C. from Concord, Massachusetts, and a friendship started that only death could end. The C.'s were very smart and genuinely charming people. We spent about a month or two together in Venice and several months in Rome afterward, and one day the regrettable incident came up. Just as I was about to get annoyed with them for reminding me of something I had almost managed to forget, I was pleasantly surprised to find that the C.'s were upset about how my performance had been received in Boston. They shared their opinions openly and honestly about the cold reaction from the audience that night and the Boston newspapers’ stance on the issue. Their position was that I had been irreverent beyond belief, beyond imagination. Fine, I had accepted that as a fact for a year or two and had been thoroughly miserable about it whenever it crossed my mind—which wasn’t often, if I could help it. Every time it did come to mind, I wondered how I could have been inspired to do something so wrong. Well, the C.'s comforted me, but they didn’t convince me to keep dwelling on that unfortunate episode. I fought that idea. I tried to push it out of my mind and to let it fade away, and I succeeded. Until Mrs. H.’s letter arrived, it had been a solid twenty-five years since I thought about it; and when she said the incident was funny, I wondered if she might actually be right. At the very least, my curiosity was piqued, so I wrote to Boston and got the whole thing copied as I presented above.
I vaguely remember some of the details of that gathering—dimly[Pg 486] I can see a hundred people—no, perhaps fifty—shadowy figures sitting at tables feeding, ghosts now to me, and nameless forever more. I don't know who they were, but I can very distinctly see, seated at the grand table and facing the rest of us, Mr. Emerson, supernaturally grave, unsmiling; Mr. Whittier, grave, lovely, his beautiful spirit shining out of his face; Mr. Longfellow, with his silken white hair and his benignant face; Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, flashing smiles and affection and all good-fellowship everywhere like a rose-diamond whose facets are being turned toward the light first one way and then another—a charming man, and always fascinating, whether he was talking or whether he was sitting still (what he would call still, but what would be more or lees motion to other people). I can see those figures with entire distinctness across this abyss of time.
I barely remember some of the details from that gathering—dimly[Pg 486] I can see maybe a hundred people—no, perhaps fifty—shadowy figures sitting at tables, now just ghosts to me, and forever unnamed. I have no idea who they were, but I can clearly see Mr. Emerson at the head table, looking incredibly serious and not smiling; Mr. Whittier, serious and kind, with his beautiful spirit shining through his face; Mr. Longfellow, with his silky white hair and kind expression; Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, beaming smiles and warmth, radiating good vibes everywhere like a sparkling diamond catching the light in different ways—a charming man, always captivating whether he was speaking or just sitting quietly (what he would call still, but what would be more or less motion to others). I can clearly picture those figures across this huge gap of time.
One other feature is clear—Willie Winter (for these past thousand years dramatic editor of the "New York Tribune," and still occupying that high post in his old age) was there. He was much younger then than he is now, and he showed it. It was always a pleasure to me to see Willie Winter at a banquet. During a matter of twenty years I was seldom at a banquet where Willie Winter was not also present, and where he did not read a charming poem written for the occasion. He did it this time, and it was up to standard: dainty, happy, choicely phrased, and as good to listen to as music, and sounding exactly as if it was pouring unprepared out of heart and brain.
One other thing is clear—Willie Winter (for the past thousand years the dramatic editor of the "New York Tribune," and still holding that important role in his old age) was there. He was much younger then than he is now, and it showed. It was always a joy for me to see Willie Winter at a banquet. Over the course of twenty years, I was rarely at a banquet where Willie Winter wasn’t also present, and where he didn’t share a lovely poem written for the occasion. He did it this time, and it was up to standard: elegant, joyful, beautifully phrased, and as delightful to listen to as music, sounding just as if it was flowing spontaneously from his heart and mind.
Now at that point ends all that was pleasurable about that notable celebration of Mr. Whittier's seventieth birthday—because I got up at that point and followed Winter, with what I have no doubt I supposed would be the gem of the evening—the gay oration above quoted from the Boston paper. I had written it all out the day before and had perfectly memorized it, and I stood up there at my genial and happy and self-satisfied ease, and began to deliver it. Those majestic guests, that row of venerable and still active volcanoes, listened, as did everybody else in the house, with attentive interest. Well, I delivered myself of—we'll say the first two hundred words of my speech. I was expecting no returns from that part of the speech, but this was not the case as regarded the rest of it. I arrived now at the dialogue: 'The old miner said, "You are the fourth, I'm going to move." "The fourth what?" said I. He answered, "The[Pg 487] fourth littery man that has been here in twenty-four hours. I am going to move." "Why, you don't tell me," said I. "Who were the others?" "Mr. Longfellow, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, consound the lot—"'
Now at that moment, all the enjoyable aspects of that famous celebration of Mr. Whittier's seventieth birthday came to an end—because I got up then and followed Winter, with what I thought would definitely be the highlight of the evening—the lively speech quoted from the Boston paper. I had written it all out the day before and had memorized it perfectly, and I stood up there at my friendly, happy, and self-satisfied ease, ready to deliver it. Those impressive guests, that row of distinguished and still vibrant personalities, listened, along with everyone else in the room, with keen interest. Well, I got through—we'll say the first two hundred words of my speech. I wasn’t expecting any interaction during that part, but things were different for the rest of it. I reached the dialogue: 'The old miner said, "You are the fourth, I'm going to move." "The fourth what?" I asked. He replied, "The[Pg 487] fourth literary man that has been here in twenty-four hours. I am going to move." "Really, you don’t say," I said. "Who were the others?" "Mr. Longfellow, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, damn the lot—"'
Now then the house's attention continued, but the expression of interest in the faces turned to a sort of black frost. I wondered what the trouble was. I didn't know. I went on, but with difficulty—I struggled along, and entered upon that miner's fearful description of the bogus Emerson, the bogus Holmes, the bogus Longfellow, always hoping—but with a gradually perishing hope—that somebody would laugh, or that somebody would at least smile, but nobody did. I didn't know enough to give it up and sit down, I was too new to public speaking, and so I went on with this awful performance, and carried it clear through to the end, in front of a body of people who seemed turned to stone with horror. It was the sort of expression their faces would have worn if I had been making these remarks about the Deity and the rest of the Trinity; there is no milder way in which to describe the petrified condition and the ghastly expression of those people.
Now, the house's attention lingered, but the looks on people's faces shifted to a sort of cold disdain. I wondered what was wrong. I had no idea. I pressed on, but it was tough—I fought through, diving into that miner's terrifying portrayal of the fake Emerson, the fake Holmes, the fake Longfellow, always hoping—but with a dwindling hope—that someone would laugh or at least smile, but no one did. I didn’t know enough to quit and sit down; I was too inexperienced at public speaking, so I continued with this dreadful act, pushing through to the end, in front of an audience that seemed frozen in horror. Their expressions resembled what it would have looked like if I had been making those remarks about God and the rest of the Trinity; there’s no gentler way to describe the petrified state and the ghastly looks on those people’s faces.
When I sat down it was with a heart which had long ceased to beat. I shall never be as dead again as I was then. I shall never be as miserable again as I was then. I speak now as one who doesn't know what the condition of things may be in the next world, but in this one I shall never be as wretched again as I was then. Howells, who was near me, tried to say a comforting word, but couldn't get beyond a gasp. There was no use—he understood the whole size of the disaster. He had good intentions, but the words froze before they could get out. It was an atmosphere that would freeze anything. If Benvenuto Cellini's salamander had been in that place he would not have survived to be put into Cellini's autobiography. There was a frightful pause. There was an awful silence, a desolating silence. Then the next man on the list had to get up—there was no help for it. That was Bishop—Bishop had just burst handsomely upon the world with a most acceptable novel, which had appeared in the "Atlantic Monthly," a place which would make any novel respectable and any author noteworthy. In this case the novel itself was recognized as being, without extraneous help, respectable. Bishop was away up in the public favor, and he was an object of high interest, consequently there was a sort of national[Pg 488] expectancy in the air; we may say our American millions were standing, from Maine to Texas and from Alaska to Florida, holding their breath, their lips parted, their hands ready to applaud when Bishop should get up on that occasion, and for the first time in his life speak in public. It was under these damaging conditions that he got up to "make good," as the vulgar say. I had spoken several times before, and that in the reason why I was able to go on without dying in my tracks, as I ought to have done—but Bishop had had no experience. He was up facing those awful deities—facing those other people, those strangers—facing human beings for the first time in his life, with a speech to utter. No doubt it was well packed away in his memory, no doubt it was fresh and usable, until I had been heard from. I suppose that after that, and under the smothering pall of that dreary silence, it began to waste away and disappear out of his head like the rags breaking from the edge of a fog, and presently there wasn't any fog left. He didn't go on—he didn't last long. It was not many sentences after his first before he began to hesitate, and break, and lose his grip, and totter, and wobble, and at last he slumped down in a limp and mushy pile.
When I sat down, my heart felt completely lifeless. I'll never be as dead inside again as I was in that moment. I won't be as miserable again as I was then. I speak now as someone who has no idea what things might be like in the next world, but in this one, I will never feel as wretched as I did back then. Howells, who was sitting nearby, tried to say something comforting but could only manage a gasp. It was pointless—he understood the full extent of the disaster. He had good intentions, but the words froze before they could escape his lips. The atmosphere was one that could chill anything. If Benvenuto Cellini's salamander had been there, it wouldn't have survived long enough to be mentioned in Cellini's autobiography. There was a dreadful pause. It was an awful, desolate silence. Then, the next person on the list had to stand up—there was no avoiding it. That was Bishop—Bishop had just made a splash with a well-received novel published in the "Atlantic Monthly," a magazine that could elevate any book and any author to respectable status. In this case, the novel was acknowledged as respectable on its own merit. Bishop was riding high in public favor, and he was an object of great interest; consequently, there was a sense of national expectancy in the air; we could say our American millions were waiting, from Maine to Texas and from Alaska to Florida, holding their breath, their lips parted, their hands ready to applaud when Bishop got up to speak publicly for the first time in his life. It was under these daunting conditions that he stood up to "make good," as people say. I had spoken several times before, and for that reason, I could go on without collapsing as I probably should have—but Bishop lacked that experience. He was facing those terrifying deities—facing strangers—facing human beings for the first time, with a speech to deliver. No doubt it was well memorized, fresh, and ready for use, until I had finished speaking. I suppose that after that, and under the suffocating weight of that gloomy silence, it started to fade away, like fog dissipating, until there was no fog left at all. He didn't continue—he didn't hold out for long. It was only a few sentences into his speech before he began to hesitate, stumble, lose his grip, wobble, and ultimately slumped down into a flaccid, mushy heap.
Well, the programme for the occasion was probably not more than one-third finished, but it ended there. Nobody rose. The next man hadn't strength enough to get up, and everybody looked so dazed, so stupefied, paralyzed, it was impossible for anybody to do anything, or even try. Nothing could go on in that strange atmosphere. Howells mournfully, and without words, hitched himself to Bishop and me and supported us out of the room. It was very kind—he was most generous. He towed us tottering away into some room in that building, and we sat down there. I don't know what my remark was now, but I know the nature of it. It was the kind of remark you make when you know that nothing in the world can help your case. But Howells was honest—he had to say the heart-breaking things he did say: that there was no help for this calamity, this shipwreck, this cataclysm; that this was the most disastrous thing that had ever happened in anybody's history—and then he added, "That is, for you—and consider what you have done for Bishop. It is bad enough in your case, you deserve to suffer. You have committed this crime, and you deserve to have all you are going to get. But here is an innocent man. Bishop had never done you[Pg 489] any harm, and see what you have done to him. He can never hold his head up again. The world can never look upon Bishop as being a live person. He is a corpse."
Well, the program for the occasion was probably only one-third complete, but it ended there. Nobody got up. The next guy didn’t have the strength to stand, and everyone looked so dazed, so stunned, paralyzed, that it was impossible for anyone to do anything or even try. Nothing could happen in that strange atmosphere. Howells sadly, and without saying anything, hooked himself to Bishop and me and helped us out of the room. It was very kind—he was incredibly generous. He guided us, staggering away into another room in the building, and we sat down there. I don’t remember what I said now, but I know what it was like. It was the kind of thing you say when you know nothing in the world can help your situation. But Howells was honest—he had to say the heartbreaking things he did say: that there was no way to avoid this disaster, this shipwreck, this cataclysm; that this was the most disastrous thing that had ever happened in anyone's history—and then he added, "That is, for you—and think about what you have done to Bishop. It’s bad enough for you; you deserve to suffer. You committed this crime, and you deserve what you’re going to get. But here is an innocent man. Bishop had never done you[Pg 489] any harm, and look at what you’ve done to him. He can never hold his head up again. The world can never see Bishop as a living person. He is a corpse."
That is the history of that episode of twenty-eight years ago, which pretty nearly killed me with shame during that first year or two whenever it forced its way into my mind.
That’s the story of that incident from twenty-eight years ago, which almost made me die of embarrassment during the first year or two whenever it popped back into my thoughts.
Now, then, I take that speech up and examine it. As I said, it arrived this morning, from Boston. I have read it twice, and unless I am an idiot, it hasn't a single defect in it from the first word to the last. It is just as good as good can be. It is smart; it is saturated with humor. There isn't a suggestion of coarseness or vulgarity in it anywhere. What could have been the matter with that house? It is amazing, it is incredible, that they didn't shout with laughter, and those deities the loudest of them all. Could the fault have been with me? Did I lose courage when I saw those great men up there whom I was going to describe in such a strange fashion? If that happened, if I showed doubt, that can account for it, for you can't be successfully funny if you show that you are afraid of it. Well, I can't account for it, but if I had those beloved and revered old literary immortals back here now on the platform at Carnegie Hall I would take that same old speech, deliver it, word for word, and melt them till they'd run all over that stage. Oh, the fault must have been with me, it is not in the speech at all.
Now, I’m going to take that speech and really look at it. As I mentioned, it arrived this morning from Boston. I've read it twice, and unless I'm missing something, it doesn’t have a single flaw from start to finish. It’s as good as it gets. It’s clever and full of humor. There’s not a hint of crudeness or vulgarity anywhere. What was wrong with that audience? It’s amazing, unbelievable, that they didn’t burst out laughing, especially those high-profile folks. Could it have been my fault? Did I lose my nerve when I faced those great men I was going to describe in such an unusual way? If that’s the case, then that could explain it, because you can't be funny if you show you’re scared of it. Well, I can't figure it out, but if I had those beloved and respected old literary legends back here on the stage at Carnegie Hall, I would deliver that same old speech, exactly as it is, and have them in stitches, running all over that stage. Oh, the issue must have been with me, not the speech at all.
[Dictated October 3, 1907.] In some ways, I was always honest; even from my earliest years I could never bring myself to use money which I had acquired in questionable ways; many a time I tried, but principle was always stronger than desire. Six or eight months ago, Lieutenant-General Nelson A. Miles was given a great dinner-party in New York, and when he and I were chatting together in the drawing-room before going out to dinner he said,
[Dictated October 3, 1907.] In some ways, I’ve always been honest; even when I was very young, I could never bring myself to spend money that I got through questionable means. I tried many times, but my principles were always stronger than my desires. About six or eight months ago, Lieutenant-General Nelson A. Miles hosted an extravagant dinner party in New York. While we were chatting in the drawing room before heading to dinner, he said,
"I've known you as much as thirty years, isn't it?"
"I've known you for about thirty years, right?"
I said, "Yes, that's about it, I think."
I said, "Yeah, that's pretty much it, I think."
He mused a moment or two and then said,
He thought for a moment and then said,
"I wonder we didn't meet in Washington in 1867; you were there at that time, weren't you?"
"I wonder why we didn't meet in Washington in 1867; you were there then, right?"
I said, "Yes, but there was a difference; I was not known then; I had not begun to bud—I was an obscurity; but you had been adding to your fine Civil War record; you had just come back[Pg 490] from your brilliant Indian campaign in the Far West, and had been rewarded with a brigadier-generalship in the regular army, and everybody was talking about you and praising you. If you had met me, you wouldn't be able to remember it now—unless some unusual circumstance of the meeting had burnt it into your memory. It is forty years ago, and people don't remember nobodies over a stretch of time like that."
I said, "Yes, but there was a difference; I wasn’t known back then; I hadn’t begun to make my mark—I was an unknown; but you had been building your impressive Civil War record; you had just returned[Pg 490] from your successful Indian campaign in the West and had been promoted to brigadier general in the regular army, and everyone was talking about you and praising you. If you had met me, you wouldn’t be able to remember it now—unless some unusual circumstance of the meeting stuck in your mind. It was forty years ago, and people don’t remember unknowns over that kind of time."
I didn't wish to continue the conversation along that line, so I changed the subject. I could have proven to him, without any trouble, that we did meet in Washington in 1867, but I thought it might embarrass one or the other of us, so I didn't do it. I remember the incident very well. This was the way of it:
I didn’t want to keep the conversation going in that direction, so I switched topics. I could have easily shown him that we did meet in Washington in 1867, but I figured it might make one of us uncomfortable, so I didn’t say anything. I remember the incident clearly. Here’s how it happened:
I had just come back from the Quaker City Excursion, and had made a contract with Bliss of Hartford to write "The Innocents Abroad." I was out of money, and I went down to Washington to see if I could earn enough there to keep me in bread and butter while I should write the book. I came across William Clinton, brother of the astronomer, and together we invented a scheme for our mutual sustenance; we became the fathers and originators of what is a common feature in the newspaper world now—the syndicate. We became the old original first Newspaper Syndicate on the planet; it was on a small scale, but that is usual with untried new enterprises. We had twelve journals on our list; they were all weeklies, all obscure and poor, and all scattered far away among the back settlements. It was a proud thing for those little newspapers to have a Washington correspondence, and a fortunate thing for us that they felt in that way about it. Each of the twelve took two letters a week from us, at a dollar per letter; each of us wrote one letter per week and sent off six duplicates of it to these benefactors, thus acquiring twenty-four dollars a week to live on—which was all we needed, in our cheap and humble quarters.
I had just returned from the Quaker City Excursion and had made a deal with Bliss from Hartford to write "The Innocents Abroad." I was low on cash, so I headed to Washington to see if I could earn enough to cover my basic expenses while I worked on the book. I ran into William Clinton, the brother of the astronomer, and we came up with a plan to support ourselves; we became the founders of what is now a standard practice in the newspaper industry—the syndicate. We established the very first Newspaper Syndicate in the world; it was small-scale, but that's typical for new ventures. We had twelve newspapers on our list; they were all weeklies, quite obscure and struggling, and scattered among the remote areas. It was quite an achievement for those small papers to have a Washington correspondent, and luckily for us, they appreciated that. Each of the twelve took two letters a week from us at a dollar per letter; each of us wrote one letter per week and sent off six copies of it to these newspapers, allowing us to earn twenty-four dollars a week to live on—which was more than enough in our modest and inexpensive living situation.
Clinton was one of the dearest and loveliest human beings I have ever known, and we led a charmed existence together, in a contentment which knew no bounds. Clinton was refined by nature and breeding; he was a gentleman by nature and breeding; he was highly educated; he was of a beautiful spirit; he was pure in heart and speech. He was a Scotchman, and a Presbyterian; a Presbyterian of the old and genuine school, being honest and sincere in his religion, and loving it, and finding serenity[Pg 491] and peace in it. He hadn't a vice—unless a large and grateful sympathy with Scotch whiskey may be called by that name. I didn't regard it as a vice, because he was a Scotchman, and Scotch whiskey to a Scotchman is as innocent as milk is to the rest of the human race. In Clinton's case it was a virtue, and not an economical one. Twenty-four dollars a week would really have been riches to us if we hadn't had to support that jug; because of the jug we were always sailing pretty close to the wind, and any tardiness in the arrival of any part of our income was sure to cause us some inconvenience.
Clinton was one of the most caring and wonderful people I’ve ever known, and we shared a life filled with happiness and contentment. Clinton was naturally refined; he was a true gentleman at heart; he was well-educated; he had a beautiful spirit; and he was pure in heart and speech. He was Scottish and a Presbyterian; a traditional and genuine Presbyterian, honest and sincere in his faith, finding peace and serenity in it. He didn’t have any vices—unless you count a strong and appreciative affection for Scotch whiskey. I didn’t see it as a vice because, for a Scotsman, Scotch whiskey is as harmless as milk is to everyone else. In Clinton’s case, it was more of a virtue than a drawback. Living on twenty-four dollars a week would have felt like we were wealthy if it weren’t for that jug of whiskey; because of that jug, we were always close to our financial limits, and any delays in receiving our income would surely cause us some trouble.
I remember a time when a shortage occurred; we had to have three dollars, and we had to have it before the close of the day. I don't know now how we happened to want all that money at one time; I only know we had to have it. Clinton told me to go out and find it—and he said he would also go out and see what he could do. He didn't seem to have any doubt that we would succeed, but I knew that that was his religion working in him; I hadn't the same confidence; I hadn't any idea where to turn to raise all that bullion, and I said so. I think he was ashamed of me, privately, because of my weak faith. He told me to give myself no uneasiness, no concern; and said in a simple, confident, and unquestioning way, "the Lord will provide." I saw that he fully believed the Lord would provide, but it seemed to me that if he had had my experience—
I remember a time when we were short on money; we needed three dollars, and we had to get it before the end of the day. I can't recall why we needed all that cash at once; I just knew it was necessary. Clinton told me to go out and find it—and he said he would also look for a solution. He seemed completely confident that we would succeed, but I realized that was just his strong belief at work; I didn’t share that confidence. I had no idea where to turn to get all that money, and I said as much. I think he felt a bit embarrassed for me because of my lack of faith. He told me not to worry or stress; and he said in a simple, confident way, "the Lord will provide." I could see he truly believed that, but it seemed to me that if he had had my experiences—
But never mind that; before he was done with me his strong faith had had its influence, and I went forth from the place almost convinced that the Lord really would provide.
But it's okay; before he finished talking to me, his strong faith had an impact, and I left the place almost convinced that the Lord would truly provide.
I wandered around the streets for an hour, trying to think up some way to get that money, but nothing suggested itself. At last I lounged into the big lobby of the Ebbitt House, which was then a new hotel, and sat down. Presently a dog came loafing along. He paused, glanced up at me and said, with his eyes, "Are you friendly?" I answered, with my eyes, that I was. He gave his tail a grateful little wag and came forward and rested his jaw on my knee and lifted his brown eyes to my face in a winningly affectionate way. He was a lovely creature—as beautiful as a girl, and he was made all of silk and velvet. I stroked his smooth brown head and fondled his drooping ears, and we were a pair of lovers right away. Pretty soon Brigadier-General Miles, the hero of the land, came strolling by in his[Pg 492] blue and gold splendors, with everybody's admiring gaze upon him. He saw the dog and stopped, and there was a light in his eye which showed that he had a warm place in his heart for dogs like this gracious creature; then he came forward and patted the dog and said,
I wandered around the streets for an hour, trying to think of a way to get that money, but nothing came to mind. Finally, I strolled into the big lobby of the Ebbitt House, which was a new hotel at the time, and sat down. Soon, a dog came sauntering by. He paused, looked up at me, and seemed to ask with his eyes, "Are you friendly?" I replied with my eyes that I was. He gave his tail a little wag of gratitude, came over, rested his chin on my knee, and lifted his brown eyes to my face in a sweetly affectionate way. He was a beautiful creature—gorgeous like a girl, and he felt like silk and velvet. I stroked his smooth brown head and petted his floppy ears, and we became instant companions. Not long after, Brigadier-General Miles, the hero of the nation, walked by in his blue and gold uniform, catching everyone's admiring gaze. He noticed the dog, stopped, and there was a spark in his eye that showed he had a soft spot for dogs like this wonderful creature; then he came over, patted the dog, and said,
"He is very fine—he is a wonder; would you sell him?"
"He’s really great—he’s amazing; would you sell him?"
I was greatly moved; it seemed a marvellous thing to me, the way Clinton's prediction had come true. I said,
I was really impressed; it felt amazing to me how Clinton's prediction had actually come true. I said,
"Yes."
Yes.
The General said,
The General stated,
"What do you ask for him?"
"What do you want from him?"
"Three dollars."
"$3."
The General was manifestly surprised. He said,
The General was clearly surprised. He said,
"Three dollars? Only three dollars? Why, that dog is a most uncommon dog; he can't possibly be worth leas than fifty. If he were mine, I wouldn't take a hundred for him. I'm afraid you are not aware of his value. Reconsider your price if you like, I don't wish to wrong you."
"Three dollars? Just three dollars? That dog is really something special; he has to be worth at least fifty. If he were mine, I wouldn’t sell him for a hundred. I think you might not realize how valuable he is. Think about your price again if you want; I don’t want to take advantage of you."
But if he had known me he would have known that I was no more capable of wronging him than he was of wronging me. I responded with the same quiet decision as before,
But if he had known me, he would have realized that I was just as unable to wrong him as he was to wrong me. I replied with the same calm determination as before,
"No—three dollars. That is his price."
"No—three dollars. That's what he wants."
"Very well, since you insist upon it," said the General, and he gave me three dollars and led the dog away, and disappeared up-stairs.
"Alright, since you insist," said the General, and he handed me three dollars, took the dog, and disappeared upstairs.
In about ten minutes a gentle-faced middle-aged gentleman came along, and began to look around here and there and under tables and everywhere, and I said to him,
In about ten minutes, a kindly-looking middle-aged man showed up and started looking around in various places, including under tables and everywhere else, and I said to him,
"Is it a dog you are looking for?"
"Are you looking for a dog?"
His face was sad, before, and troubled; but it lit up gladly now, and he answered,
His face was sad and troubled before, but now it brightened with joy, and he replied,
"Yes—have you seen him?"
"Yeah—have you seen him?"
"Yes," I said, "he was here a minute ago, and I saw him follow a gentleman away. I think I could find him for you if you would like me to try."
"Yeah," I said, "he was here just a minute ago, and I saw him follow a guy outside. I think I could track him down for you if you want me to give it a shot."
I have seldom seen a person look so grateful—and there was gratitude in his voice, too, when he conceded that he would like me to try. I said I would do it with great pleasure, but that as it might take a little time I hoped he would not mind paying me something for my trouble. He said he would do it most[Pg 493] gladly—repeating that phrase "most gladly"—and asked me how much. I said—
I have rarely seen someone look so grateful—and there was gratitude in his voice as well when he admitted that he would like me to give it a shot. I said I would be happy to do it, but since it might take a little time, I hoped he wouldn't mind paying me something for my effort. He said he would do it most[Pg 493] gladly—repeating that phrase "most gladly"—and asked me how much. I said—
"Three dollars."
"$3."
He looked surprised, and said,
He seemed surprised and said,
"Dear me, it is nothing! I will pay you ten, quite willingly."
"Wow, it’s really nothing! I'll gladly pay you ten."
But I said,
But I said,
"No, three is the price"—and I started for the stairs without waiting for any further argument, for Clinton had said that that was the amount that the Lord would provide, and it seemed to me that it would be sacrilegious to take a penny more than was promised.
"No, three is the price"—and I headed for the stairs without waiting for any more debate, since Clinton had said that was the amount the Lord would provide, and it felt wrong to take even a penny more than what was promised.
I got the number of the General's room from the office-clerk, as I passed by his wicket, and when I reached the room I found the General there caressing his dog, and quite happy. I said,
I got the General's room number from the office clerk as I walked by his desk, and when I got to the room, I found the General there petting his dog and looking very pleased. I said,
"I am sorry, but I have to take the dog again."
"I’m sorry, but I have to take the dog out again."
He seemed very much surprised, and said,
He looked really surprised and said,
"Take him again? Why, he is my dog; you sold him to me, and at your own price."
"Take him back? Why, he's my dog; you sold him to me, and at your own price."
"Yes," I said, "it is true—but I have to have him, because the man wants him again."
"Yeah," I said, "that's true—but I need to have him, because the guy wants him back."
"What man?"
"Which guy?"
"The man that owns him; he wasn't my dog."
"The guy who owns him; he wasn't my dog."
The General looked even more surprised than before, and for a moment he couldn't seem to find his voice; then he said,
The General looked even more surprised than before, and for a moment he couldn't seem to find his voice; then he said,
"Do you mean to tell me that you were selling another man's dog—and knew it?"
"Are you really saying that you were selling someone else's dog—and you knew it?"
"Yes, I knew it wasn't my dog."
"Yeah, I knew it wasn't my dog."
"Then why did you sell him?"
"Then why did you sell him?"
I said,
I said,
"Well, that is a curious question to ask. I sold him because you wanted him. You offered to buy the dog; you can't deny that I was not anxious to sell him—I had not even thought of selling him, but it seemed to me that if it could be any accommodation to you—"
"Well, that's an interesting question to ask. I sold him because you wanted him. You offered to buy the dog; you can't deny that I wasn't eager to sell him—I hadn't even considered selling him, but it seemed to me that if it could help you—"
He broke me off in the middle, and said,
He cut me off and said,
"Accommodation to me? It is the most extraordinary spirit of accommodation I have ever heard of—the idea of your selling a dog that didn't belong to you—"
"Accommodation to me? It’s the most incredible idea of accommodation I’ve ever encountered—the thought of you selling a dog that wasn’t even yours—"
I broke him off there, and said,
I interrupted him there and said,
"There is no relevancy about this kind of argument; you said[Pg 494] yourself that the dog was probably worth a hundred dollars, I only asked you three; was there anything unfair about that? You offered to pay more, you know you did. I only asked you three; you can't deny it."
"There’s no point in arguing about this; you said[Pg 494] yourself that the dog was probably worth a hundred dollars, and I only asked you for three. Was there anything unfair about that? You offered to pay more, and you know it. I only asked you for three; you can’t deny that."
"Oh, what in the world has that to do with it! The crux of the matter is that you didn't own the dog—can't you see that? You seem to think that there is no impropriety in selling property that isn't yours provided you sell it cheap. Now, then—"
"Oh, what does that have to do with anything! The main point is that you didn't own the dog—can't you see that? You seem to believe there's nothing wrong with selling something that isn't yours as long as you sell it for a low price. So, then—"
I said,
I stated,
"Please don't argue about it any more. You can't get around the fact that the price was perfectly fair, perfectly reasonable—considering that I didn't own the dog—and so arguing about it is only a waste of words. I have to have him back again because the man wants him; don't you see that I haven't any choice in the matter? Put yourself in my place. Suppose you had sold a dog that didn't belong to you; suppose you—"
"Please don’t argue about it anymore. You can’t get around the fact that the price was totally fair and reasonable—especially since I didn’t own the dog—so arguing about it is just a waste of breath. I need to get him back because the guy wants him; don’t you see that I have no choice? Imagine if you were in my position. What if you sold a dog that wasn’t yours? What if you—"
"Oh," he said, "don't muddle my brains any more with your idiotic reasonings! Take him along, and give me a rest."
"Oh," he said, "stop confusing me with your ridiculous arguments! Take him with you, and let me have a break."
So I paid back the three dollars and led the dog down-stairs and passed him over to his owner, and collected three for my trouble.
So I gave back the three dollars, took the dog downstairs, handed him over to his owner, and received three bucks for my effort.
I went away then with a good conscience, because I had acted honorably; I never could have used the three that I sold the dog for, because it was not rightly my own, but the three I got for restoring him to his rightful owner was righteously and properly mine, because I had earned it. That man might never have gotten that dog back at all, if it hadn't been for me. My principles have remained to this day what they were then. I was always honest; I know I can never be otherwise. It is as I said in the beginning—I was never able to persuade myself to use money which I had acquired in questionable ways.
I walked away feeling good about myself because I had acted honorably. I could never have used the three dollars I got for selling the dog since it wasn’t rightfully mine. But the three dollars I received for returning him to his rightful owner were rightfully and justly mine because I earned it. That guy might never have gotten his dog back if it weren't for me. My principles have stayed the same since then. I’ve always been honest, and I know I can’t be any other way. Like I said at the beginning—I’ve never been able to convince myself to spend money I got in questionable ways.
Now, then, that is the tale. Some of it is true.
Now, that's the story. Some of it is true.
Mark Twain.
Mark Twain.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!