This is a modern-English version of Walden, and On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience, originally written by Thoreau, Henry David. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

WALDEN

and
ON THE DUTY OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

by Henry David Thoreau

cover

WALDEN

Economy

When I wrote the following pages, or rather the bulk of them, I lived alone, in the woods, a mile from any neighbor, in a house which I had built myself, on the shore of Walden Pond, in Concord, Massachusetts, and earned my living by the labor of my hands only. I lived there two years and two months. At present I am a sojourner in civilized life again.

When I wrote the following pages, or most of them, I lived alone in the woods, a mile from any neighbor, in a house that I built myself, on the edge of Walden Pond, in Concord, Massachusetts, and I made my living through hard work alone. I stayed there for two years and two months. Right now, I’m back in the civilized world again.

I should not obtrude my affairs so much on the notice of my readers if very particular inquiries had not been made by my townsmen concerning my mode of life, which some would call impertinent, though they do not appear to me at all impertinent, but, considering the circumstances, very natural and pertinent. Some have asked what I got to eat; if I did not feel lonesome; if I was not afraid; and the like. Others have been curious to learn what portion of my income I devoted to charitable purposes; and some, who have large families, how many poor children I maintained. I will therefore ask those of my readers who feel no particular interest in me to pardon me if I undertake to answer some of these questions in this book. In most books, the I, or first person, is omitted; in this it will be retained; that, in respect to egotism, is the main difference. We commonly do not remember that it is, after all, always the first person that is speaking. I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well. Unfortunately, I am confined to this theme by the narrowness of my experience. Moreover, I, on my side, require of every writer, first or last, a simple and sincere account of his own life, and not merely what he has heard of other men’s lives; some such account as he would send to his kindred from a distant land; for if he has lived sincerely, it must have been in a distant land to me. Perhaps these pages are more particularly addressed to poor students. As for the rest of my readers, they will accept such portions as apply to them. I trust that none will stretch the seams in putting on the coat, for it may do good service to him whom it fits.

I shouldn’t impose my personal matters on my readers if my neighbors hadn’t made very specific inquiries about my lifestyle. Some might call these questions intrusive, but I find them quite natural given the circumstances. People have asked what I eat, whether I feel lonely, if I’m scared, and similar questions. Others are curious about how much of my income I donate to charity and how many poor children I support, especially those with large families. So, I’d like to ask my readers who aren’t particularly interested in me to forgive me for addressing some of these questions in this book. In most books, the first-person perspective is left out; in this one, it will stay, which is the main difference regarding self-absorption. We often forget that it’s always a first-person voice speaking. I wouldn’t talk so much about myself if I had someone else whose life I knew as well. Unfortunately, I’m limited to this topic by my narrow experiences. Furthermore, I expect every writer to give a straightforward and honest account of their own life, not just stories they’ve heard about others. It should be something they would share with their family from a faraway place; for if they have lived genuinely, it must feel like it was in a distant land for me. Perhaps these pages are especially aimed at struggling students. As for my other readers, they can take what resonates with them. I hope no one tries to stretch this too much, as it may serve someone it fits just right.

I would fain say something, not so much concerning the Chinese and Sandwich Islanders as you who read these pages, who are said to live in New England; something about your condition, especially your outward condition or circumstances in this world, in this town, what it is, whether it is necessary that it be as bad as it is, whether it cannot be improved as well as not. I have travelled a good deal in Concord; and everywhere, in shops, and offices, and fields, the inhabitants have appeared to me to be doing penance in a thousand remarkable ways. What I have heard of Brahmins sitting exposed to four fires and looking in the face of the sun; or hanging suspended, with their heads downward, over flames; or looking at the heavens over their shoulders “until it becomes impossible for them to resume their natural position, while from the twist of the neck nothing but liquids can pass into the stomach;” or dwelling, chained for life, at the foot of a tree; or measuring with their bodies, like caterpillars, the breadth of vast empires; or standing on one leg on the tops of pillars,—even these forms of conscious penance are hardly more incredible and astonishing than the scenes which I daily witness. The twelve labors of Hercules were trifling in comparison with those which my neighbors have undertaken; for they were only twelve, and had an end; but I could never see that these men slew or captured any monster or finished any labor. They have no friend Iolas to burn with a hot iron the root of the hydra’s head, but as soon as one head is crushed, two spring up.

I would like to say something, not so much about the Chinese and Sandwich Islanders but about you who are reading this, who are said to live in New England; something about your situation, especially your external circumstances in this world and in this town, what it is like, whether it has to be as bad as it is, and whether it could be improved as well. I’ve traveled quite a bit in Concord, and everywhere—in shops, offices, and fields—the locals seem to be going through penance in a thousand unusual ways. What I've heard about Brahmins sitting exposed to four fires and staring into the sun; or hanging upside down over flames; or gazing at the heavens over their shoulders “until it becomes impossible for them to resume their natural position, while from the twist of the neck nothing but liquids can pass into the stomach;” or remaining chained for life at the foot of a tree; or crawling like caterpillars to measure vast empires; or balancing on one leg on top of pillars—even these acts of conscious penance seem hardly more incredible and astonishing than the scenes I witness every day. The twelve labors of Hercules look trivial compared to those undertaken by my neighbors; after all, they were only twelve and came to an end, but I could never see that these men killed or captured any monster or completed any task. They don't have any friend like Iolas to burn off the hydra's head, but as soon as one head is crushed, two more spring up.

I see young men, my townsmen, whose misfortune it is to have inherited farms, houses, barns, cattle, and farming tools; for these are more easily acquired than got rid of. Better if they had been born in the open pasture and suckled by a wolf, that they might have seen with clearer eyes what field they were called to labor in. Who made them serfs of the soil? Why should they eat their sixty acres, when man is condemned to eat only his peck of dirt? Why should they begin digging their graves as soon as they are born? They have got to live a man’s life, pushing all these things before them, and get on as well as they can. How many a poor immortal soul have I met well nigh crushed and smothered under its load, creeping down the road of life, pushing before it a barn seventy-five feet by forty, its Augean stables never cleansed, and one hundred acres of land, tillage, mowing, pasture, and wood-lot! The portionless, who struggle with no such unnecessary inherited encumbrances, find it labor enough to subdue and cultivate a few cubic feet of flesh.

I see young men from my town who are unfortunately stuck with farms, houses, barns, cattle, and farming tools; these are much easier to acquire than to get rid of. It would have been better if they had been born in the wild and raised by a wolf, so they could have clearly seen what work they were meant to do. Who made them slaves to the land? Why should they have to manage their sixty acres when all a man is supposed to deal with is his share of dirt? Why should they start digging their own graves as soon as they come into the world? They have to live a man’s life, dragging all this stuff along with them and just getting by as best they can. How many poor souls have I seen nearly crushed and suffocated under their burdens, dragging through life with a barn seventy-five feet by forty, its Augean stables never cleaned, and a hundred acres of land—fields, meadows, pastures, and woodlots! Those who inherit nothing and struggle without such unnecessary burdens find it tough enough just to manage a few cubic feet of flesh.

But men labor under a mistake. The better part of the man is soon plowed into the soil for compost. By a seeming fate, commonly called necessity, they are employed, as it says in an old book, laying up treasures which moth and rust will corrupt and thieves break through and steal. It is a fool’s life, as they will find when they get to the end of it, if not before. It is said that Deucalion and Pyrrha created men by throwing stones over their heads behind them:—

But people are making a mistake. The best part of a person is quickly turned into fertilizer. By what seems like fate, often referred to as necessity, they are busy, as an old book says, accumulating riches that will be destroyed by moths and rust, and that thieves will steal. It's a foolish way to live, as they will realize by the end of their life, if not earlier. It’s said that Deucalion and Pyrrha created humans by tossing stones behind them:—

Inde genus durum sumus, experiensque laborum,
Et documenta damus quâ simus origine nati.

Inde we are of the tough kind, experienced in hardships,
And we provide proof of where we were born.

Or, as Raleigh rhymes it in his sonorous way,—

Or, as Raleigh puts it in his melodic style,—

“From thence our kind hard-hearted is, enduring pain and care,
Approving that our bodies of a stony nature are.”

“From there our kind is hard-hearted, enduring pain and worry,
Agreeing that our bodies are made of a stony nature.”

So much for a blind obedience to a blundering oracle, throwing the stones over their heads behind them, and not seeing where they fell.

So much for blindly following a clueless oracle, throwing the stones over their heads and not knowing where they landed.

Most men, even in this comparatively free country, through mere ignorance and mistake, are so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them. Their fingers, from excessive toil, are too clumsy and tremble too much for that. Actually, the laboring man has not leisure for a true integrity day by day; he cannot afford to sustain the manliest relations to men; his labor would be depreciated in the market. He has no time to be anything but a machine. How can he remember well his ignorance—which his growth requires—who has so often to use his knowledge? We should feed and clothe him gratuitously sometimes, and recruit him with our cordials, before we judge of him. The finest qualities of our nature, like the bloom on fruits, can be preserved only by the most delicate handling. Yet we do not treat ourselves nor one another thus tenderly.

Most men, even in this relatively free country, are so caught up in the artificial worries and unnecessarily rough jobs of life that they can’t appreciate its finer rewards. Their hands, from too much hard work, are too clumsy and shake too much for that. In reality, the working person doesn’t have the time for true integrity every day; they can’t afford to build meaningful relationships with others because their work would be undervalued. They are left with no time to be anything but a machine. How can they truly acknowledge their ignorance—something they need for growth—when they frequently have to rely on their knowledge? We should sometimes provide for their needs and support them with kindness before passing judgment. The best parts of our nature, like the bloom on fruit, can only be preserved with the utmost care. Yet, we don’t treat ourselves or each other with that kind of gentleness.

Some of you, we all know, are poor, find it hard to live, are sometimes, as it were, gasping for breath. I have no doubt that some of you who read this book are unable to pay for all the dinners which you have actually eaten, or for the coats and shoes which are fast wearing or are already worn out, and have come to this page to spend borrowed or stolen time, robbing your creditors of an hour. It is very evident what mean and sneaking lives many of you live, for my sight has been whetted by experience; always on the limits, trying to get into business and trying to get out of debt, a very ancient slough, called by the Latins æs alienum, another’s brass, for some of their coins were made of brass; still living, and dying, and buried by this other’s brass; always promising to pay, promising to pay, tomorrow, and dying today, insolvent; seeking to curry favor, to get custom, by how many modes, only not state-prison offences; lying, flattering, voting, contracting yourselves into a nutshell of civility or dilating into an atmosphere of thin and vaporous generosity, that you may persuade your neighbor to let you make his shoes, or his hat, or his coat, or his carriage, or import his groceries for him; making yourselves sick, that you may lay up something against a sick day, something to be tucked away in an old chest, or in a stocking behind the plastering, or, more safely, in the brick bank; no matter where, no matter how much or how little.

Some of you, as we all know, are struggling, finding it hard to make ends meet, sometimes feeling like you’re gasping for breath. I’m sure some of you reading this book can’t afford to pay for all the meals you’ve actually eaten, or for the coats and shoes that are getting worn out or are already beyond repair, and you’ve come to this page to steal a moment, taking an hour from your creditors. It's clear what difficult and sneaky lives many of you lead because I’ve seen it all; always at the brink, trying to start a business and trying to get out of debt, in a very old struggle known to the Romans as æs alienum, meaning someone else’s money, since some of their coins were made of brass; still living, dying, and being buried by this other person’s money; always saying you’ll pay, promising to pay, tomorrow, but dying today, bankrupt; trying to win favor, to gain customers, using all kinds of tactics, just not resorting to crimes that would land you in prison; lying, flattering, making yourself small in a shell of politeness or expanding into an atmosphere of thin and insincere generosity, just to convince your neighbor to let you make his shoes, or his hat, or his coat, or his carriage, or to buy his groceries for him; even making yourselves ill so you can save something for a rainy day, something tucked away in an old chest, or a stocking hidden behind the wall, or, even better, in a brick bank; it doesn’t matter where, or how much or how little.

I sometimes wonder that we can be so frivolous, I may almost say, as to attend to the gross but somewhat foreign form of servitude called Negro Slavery, there are so many keen and subtle masters that enslave both north and south. It is hard to have a southern overseer; it is worse to have a northern one; but worst of all when you are the slave-driver of yourself. Talk of a divinity in man! Look at the teamster on the highway, wending to market by day or night; does any divinity stir within him? His highest duty to fodder and water his horses! What is his destiny to him compared with the shipping interests? Does not he drive for Squire Make-a-stir? How godlike, how immortal, is he? See how he cowers and sneaks, how vaguely all the day he fears, not being immortal nor divine, but the slave and prisoner of his own opinion of himself, a fame won by his own deeds. Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that it is which determines, or rather indicates, his fate. Self-emancipation even in the West Indian provinces of the fancy and imagination,—what Wilberforce is there to bring that about? Think, also, of the ladies of the land weaving toilet cushions against the last day, not to betray too green an interest in their fates! As if you could kill time without injuring eternity.

I sometimes wonder how we can be so carefree, as to pay attention to the obvious but somewhat distant issue of Negro Slavery, when there are so many sharp and subtle masters who enslave people in both the North and the South. It's tough to deal with a southern overseer; it’s worse with a northern one; but the worst is when you're your own slave-driver. Talk about a divine spark in humanity! Look at the teamster on the road, heading to market day or night; does any divinity awaken in him? His main responsibility is to feed and water his horses! What does his destiny mean to him compared to the shipping interests? Doesn’t he work for Squire Make-a-stir? How godlike, how immortal is he? Just look at how he cowers and sneaks, how all day long he fears, not because he’s divine or immortal, but because he’s the slave and prisoner of his own self-image, a reputation earned by his own actions. Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared to our own private opinions. What a person thinks of himself is what truly determines, or rather indicates, his fate. Self-emancipation, even in the idealized West Indies—what Wilberforce is there to make that happen? Think about the ladies of the land making cushions for their vanity, careful not to show too much concern for their own futures! As if you could waste time without hurting eternity.

The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation. From the desperate city you go into the desperate country, and have to console yourself with the bravery of minks and muskrats. A stereotyped but unconscious despair is concealed even under what are called the games and amusements of mankind. There is no play in them, for this comes after work. But it is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things.

The majority of people live lives of quiet desperation. What we refer to as resignation is really just confirmed desperation. From the desperate city, you move into the desperate countryside, and you have to find comfort in the courage of minks and muskrats. A predictable but unrecognized despair lies beneath what we call the games and amusements of humanity. There's no real play in these activities, as play comes after work. However, it's a sign of wisdom not to engage in desperate actions.

When we consider what, to use the words of the catechism, is the chief end of man, and what are the true necessaries and means of life, it appears as if men had deliberately chosen the common mode of living because they preferred it to any other. Yet they honestly think there is no choice left. But alert and healthy natures remember that the sun rose clear. It is never too late to give up our prejudices. No way of thinking or doing, however ancient, can be trusted without proof. What everybody echoes or in silence passes by as true to-day may turn out to be falsehood to-morrow, mere smoke of opinion, which some had trusted for a cloud that would sprinkle fertilizing rain on their fields. What old people say you cannot do you try and find that you can. Old deeds for old people, and new deeds for new. Old people did not know enough once, perchance, to fetch fresh fuel to keep the fire a-going; new people put a little dry wood under a pot, and are whirled round the globe with the speed of birds, in a way to kill old people, as the phrase is. Age is no better, hardly so well, qualified for an instructor as youth, for it has not profited so much as it has lost. One may almost doubt if the wisest man has learned any thing of absolute value by living. Practically, the old have no very important advice to give the young, their own experience has been so partial, and their lives have been such miserable failures, for private reasons, as they must believe; and it may be that they have some faith left which belies that experience, and they are only less young than they were. I have lived some thirty years on this planet, and I have yet to hear the first syllable of valuable or even earnest advice from my seniors. They have told me nothing, and probably cannot tell me any thing to the purpose. Here is life, an experiment to a great extent untried by me; but it does not avail me that they have tried it. If I have any experience which I think valuable, I am sure to reflect that this my Mentors said nothing about.

When we think about what, as the catechism puts it, is the main purpose of life and what the real necessities and means of living are, it seems like people have intentionally chosen their current way of living because they prefer it over any alternatives. Yet, they genuinely believe there's no other option. But those who are alert and healthy remember that the sun rose clear. It's never too late to let go of our biases. No way of thinking or acting, no matter how old, should be accepted without proof. What everyone accepts or quietly agrees with as true today might turn out to be false tomorrow, just mere smoke of opinion, which some mistakenly believe will bring nourishing rain to their fields. What older people say you can't do, you try and discover that you can. Old actions for old people, and new actions for new ones. The elderly may not have known enough once, perhaps, to gather fresh fuel to keep the fire going; new people start a little fire with dry wood and can travel around the world at the speed of birds, which can overwhelm the elderly, as the saying goes. Age isn't necessarily better or more qualified to teach than youth, as it has often lost more than it has gained. One might even question whether the wisest person has learned anything of real value from living. In practical terms, older people don't have much significant advice to offer the young; their experiences have been so limited, and their lives such failures, due to personal reasons they must believe; perhaps they still hold onto some faith that contradicts that experience, and they’re just less young than they once were. I've spent about thirty years on this planet, and I have yet to hear a single piece of valuable or even sincere advice from my elders. They haven't told me anything, and probably can't tell me anything useful. Here is life, an experiment largely untried by me; but their experiences don’t benefit me. If I have any experiences I consider valuable, I’m sure to reflect that my mentors said nothing about it.

One farmer says to me, “You cannot live on vegetable food solely, for it furnishes nothing to make bones with;” and so he religiously devotes a part of his day to supplying his system with the raw material of bones; walking all the while he talks behind his oxen, which, with vegetable-made bones, jerk him and his lumbering plough along in spite of every obstacle. Some things are really necessaries of life in some circles, the most helpless and diseased, which in others are luxuries merely, and in others still are entirely unknown.

One farmer tells me, “You can’t survive on just vegetables because they don’t provide anything to build bones;” and so he diligently spends part of his day getting the raw materials for bones. He walks behind his oxen while talking, which, with their plant-based bones, pull him and his heavy plow through all kinds of challenges. Some things are essential for life in some communities, especially among the most vulnerable and sick, which in others are just luxuries, and in still others are completely unfamiliar.

The whole ground of human life seems to some to have been gone over by their predecessors, both the heights and the valleys, and all things to have been cared for. According to Evelyn, “the wise Solomon prescribed ordinances for the very distances of trees; and the Roman prætors have decided how often you may go into your neighbor’s land to gather the acorns which fall on it without trespass, and what share belongs to that neighbor.” Hippocrates has even left directions how we should cut our nails; that is, even with the ends of the fingers, neither shorter nor longer. Undoubtedly the very tedium and ennui which presume to have exhausted the variety and the joys of life are as old as Adam. But man’s capacities have never been measured; nor are we to judge of what he can do by any precedents, so little has been tried. Whatever have been thy failures hitherto, “be not afflicted, my child, for who shall assign to thee what thou hast left undone?”

The entire landscape of human life seems to have been explored by those who came before us, covering both the peaks and the valleys, with everything seemingly accounted for. According to Evelyn, “the wise Solomon set rules for the exact spacing of trees; and the Roman prætors determined how often you can enter your neighbor’s property to collect falling acorns without trespassing, and what portion belongs to that neighbor.” Hippocrates even provided instructions on how to trim our nails; that is, they should be cut flush with the ends of the fingers, neither too short nor too long. Clearly, the very boredom and monotony that assume to have exhausted the variety and pleasures of life are as ancient as Adam. However, humanity's potential has never been fully measured; we shouldn't judge what people can achieve based on past examples, as so little has been attempted. Regardless of your past failures, “don’t be downcast, my child, for who can dictate what you have yet to accomplish?”

We might try our lives by a thousand simple tests; as, for instance, that the same sun which ripens my beans illumines at once a system of earths like ours. If I had remembered this it would have prevented some mistakes. This was not the light in which I hoed them. The stars are the apexes of what wonderful triangles! What distant and different beings in the various mansions of the universe are contemplating the same one at the same moment! Nature and human life are as various as our several constitutions. Who shall say what prospect life offers to another? Could a greater miracle take place than for us to look through each other’s eyes for an instant? We should live in all the ages of the world in an hour; ay, in all the worlds of the ages. History, Poetry, Mythology!—I know of no reading of another’s experience so startling and informing as this would be.

We could test our lives in a thousand simple ways; for example, the same sun that ripens my beans also shines on a system of worlds like ours. If I had kept this in mind, I could have avoided some mistakes. That wasn’t the perspective I had when I was working in the fields. The stars are the peaks of such amazing triangles! What distant and different beings in the many realms of the universe are gazing at the same star at this very moment! Nature and human life are as diverse as our individual natures. Who can say what opportunities life presents to someone else? Could there be a greater miracle than for us to see through each other’s eyes, even for just a moment? In that instant, we would experience all the ages of the world in an hour; indeed, in all the worlds throughout history. History, Poetry, Mythology!—I can’t think of any experience of another person that would be as shocking and enlightening as this would be.

The greater part of what my neighbors call good I believe in my soul to be bad, and if I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good behavior. What demon possessed me that I behaved so well? You may say the wisest thing you can, old man,—you who have lived seventy years, not without honor of a kind,—I hear an irresistible voice which invites me away from all that. One generation abandons the enterprises of another like stranded vessels.

Most of what my neighbors consider good, I truly believe deep down is bad, and if I regret anything, it's probably my good behavior. What got into me that I acted so well? You can say whatever you want, old man—you who have lived seventy years, not without some form of honor—I still hear a compelling voice pulling me away from all that. One generation leaves behind the efforts of another like abandoned ships.

I think that we may safely trust a good deal more than we do. We may waive just so much care of ourselves as we honestly bestow elsewhere. Nature is as well adapted to our weakness as to our strength. The incessant anxiety and strain of some is a well nigh incurable form of disease. We are made to exaggerate the importance of what work we do; and yet how much is not done by us! or, what if we had been taken sick? How vigilant we are! determined not to live by faith if we can avoid it; all the day long on the alert, at night we unwillingly say our prayers and commit ourselves to uncertainties. So thoroughly and sincerely are we compelled to live, reverencing our life, and denying the possibility of change. This is the only way, we say; but there are as many ways as there can be drawn radii from one centre. All change is a miracle to contemplate; but it is a miracle which is taking place every instant. Confucius said, “To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge.” When one man has reduced a fact of the imagination to be a fact to his understanding, I foresee that all men at length establish their lives on that basis.

I believe we can trust a lot more than we currently do. We can let go of some of the worries we have for ourselves if we genuinely invest that care elsewhere. Nature is equally supportive of our weaknesses as it is of our strengths. The constant anxiety and pressure some people feel can almost be an incurable disease. We tend to make our work seem more significant than it actually is; yet, so much happens outside our control! What if we got sick? We’re always on guard, determined not to live by faith if we can help it; we stay vigilant all day, and at night we reluctantly pray and hand ourselves over to uncertainty. We live so fully and sincerely, honoring our lives, while denying the possibility of change. We insist this is the only way, but there are as many paths as there are lines drawn from a single point. Change is a miracle to reflect on, yet it occurs every moment. Confucius pointed out, “To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge.” When one person turns an imagined idea into a fact for themselves, I can see that eventually everyone else bases their lives on that same idea.

Let us consider for a moment what most of the trouble and anxiety which I have referred to is about, and how much it is necessary that we be troubled, or, at least, careful. It would be some advantage to live a primitive and frontier life, though in the midst of an outward civilization, if only to learn what are the gross necessaries of life and what methods have been taken to obtain them; or even to look over the old day-books of the merchants, to see what it was that men most commonly bought at the stores, what they stored, that is, what are the grossest groceries. For the improvements of ages have had but little influence on the essential laws of man’s existence; as our skeletons, probably, are not to be distinguished from those of our ancestors.

Let’s take a moment to think about what most of the trouble and anxiety I’ve mentioned is really about, and how necessary it is for us to be troubled or, at the very least, careful. It could be somewhat beneficial to live a simple, frontier life, even amidst modern civilization, just to understand the basic necessities of life and the methods used to acquire them; or even to check out the old ledgers of merchants, to see what items people commonly bought from stores, what they stocked up on, meaning what the basic groceries were. Because the advancements of the ages have had little impact on the fundamental laws of human existence; our skeletons, most likely, don't differ much from those of our ancestors.

By the words, necessary of life, I mean whatever, of all that man obtains by his own exertions, has been from the first, or from long use has become, so important to human life that few, if any, whether from savageness, or poverty, or philosophy, ever attempt to do without it. To many creatures there is in this sense but one necessary of life, Food. To the bison of the prairie it is a few inches of palatable grass, with water to drink; unless he seeks the Shelter of the forest or the mountain’s shadow. None of the brute creation requires more than Food and Shelter. The necessaries of life for man in this climate may, accurately enough, be distributed under the several heads of Food, Shelter, Clothing, and Fuel; for not till we have secured these are we prepared to entertain the true problems of life with freedom and a prospect of success. Man has invented, not only houses, but clothes and cooked food; and possibly from the accidental discovery of the warmth of fire, and the consequent use of it, at first a luxury, arose the present necessity to sit by it. We observe cats and dogs acquiring the same second nature. By proper Shelter and Clothing we legitimately retain our own internal heat; but with an excess of these, or of Fuel, that is, with an external heat greater than our own internal, may not cookery properly be said to begin? Darwin, the naturalist, says of the inhabitants of Tierra del Fuego, that while his own party, who were well clothed and sitting close to a fire, were far from too warm, these naked savages, who were farther off, were observed, to his great surprise, “to be streaming with perspiration at undergoing such a roasting.” So, we are told, the New Hollander goes naked with impunity, while the European shivers in his clothes. Is it impossible to combine the hardiness of these savages with the intellectualness of the civilized man? According to Liebig, man’s body is a stove, and food the fuel which keeps up the internal combustion in the lungs. In cold weather we eat more, in warm less. The animal heat is the result of a slow combustion, and disease and death take place when this is too rapid; or for want of fuel, or from some defect in the draught, the fire goes out. Of course the vital heat is not to be confounded with fire; but so much for analogy. It appears, therefore, from the above list, that the expression, animal life, is nearly synonymous with the expression, animal heat; for while Food may be regarded as the Fuel which keeps up the fire within us,—and Fuel serves only to prepare that Food or to increase the warmth of our bodies by addition from without,—Shelter and Clothing also serve only to retain the heat thus generated and absorbed.

By "necessary for life," I mean anything that a person gets through their own efforts, which has become so essential to human existence over time that very few—if any—choose to live without it, whether due to savagery, poverty, or philosophical beliefs. For many creatures, there’s really only one necessity for life: Food. For a bison on the prairie, it’s just a few inches of tasty grass and water to drink, unless it looks for the shelter of the forest or the shade of a mountain. Animals in general need nothing more than Food and Shelter. The essentials for humans in this climate can be categorized as Food, Shelter, Clothing, and Fuel; it is only once we have secured these that we can approach the true challenges of life with freedom and a chance for success. Humans have created not just houses, but also clothing and cooked food; and possibly, from the accidental discovery of fire's warmth, which was initially a luxury, arose the necessity of sitting by it. We see cats and dogs adapting to this as well. With proper Shelter and Clothing, we can maintain our body heat; but with too much of either, or too much Fuel—meaning an external warmth greater than our internal heat—doesn’t cookery begin? Darwin, the naturalist, noted that the inhabitants of Tierra del Fuego, while his own group was well-dressed and sitting close to a fire and not too warm, the naked natives, further away, were observed to be, to his surprise, “streaming with perspiration from the heat.” Similarly, we learn that the New Hollander can go without clothes without issue, while the European shivers in his garments. Is it impossible to combine the resilience of these savages with the intelligence of civilized people? According to Liebig, the human body is like a stove, and food is the fuel that keeps the internal combustion going in our lungs. We eat more in cold weather and less when it’s warm. Body heat results from a slow combustion, and when this combustion speeds up too much, or there's not enough fuel, or the airflow is somehow obstructed, the fire goes out. Naturally, vital heat shouldn’t be confused with fire; but that’s just an analogy. It seems that the term "animal life" is nearly synonymous with "animal heat"; for while Food serves as the fuel that maintains the fire within us—and Fuel is only needed to prepare that Food or to warm our bodies from the outside—Shelter and Clothing also only work to retain that heat we've generated and absorbed.

The grand necessity, then, for our bodies, is to keep warm, to keep the vital heat in us. What pains we accordingly take, not only with our Food, and Clothing, and Shelter, but with our beds, which are our night-clothes, robbing the nests and breasts of birds to prepare this shelter within a shelter, as the mole has its bed of grass and leaves at the end of its burrow! The poor man is wont to complain that this is a cold world; and to cold, no less physical than social, we refer directly a great part of our ails. The summer, in some climates, makes possible to man a sort of Elysian life. Fuel, except to cook his Food, is then unnecessary; the sun is his fire, and many of the fruits are sufficiently cooked by its rays; while Food generally is more various, and more easily obtained, and Clothing and Shelter are wholly or half unnecessary. At the present day, and in this country, as I find by my own experience, a few implements, a knife, an axe, a spade, a wheelbarrow, &c., and for the studious, lamplight, stationery, and access to a few books, rank next to necessaries, and can all be obtained at a trifling cost. Yet some, not wise, go to the other side of the globe, to barbarous and unhealthy regions, and devote themselves to trade for ten or twenty years, in order that they may live,—that is, keep comfortably warm,—and die in New England at last. The luxuriously rich are not simply kept comfortably warm, but unnaturally hot; as I implied before, they are cooked, of course à la mode.

The main need for our bodies is to stay warm and maintain our vital heat. We go to great lengths for this, not just with our food, clothing, and shelter, but also with our beds, which act as our night gear. We even take materials from birds’ nests to create this extra shelter, similar to how moles use grass and leaves for their beds at the end of their burrows! The poor often say that this world is a cold one; both physical and social coldness are directly linked to many of our problems. In some places during summer, people can enjoy a blissful life. Fuel, apart from cooking, becomes unnecessary; the sun provides warmth, and many fruits are cooked just by its rays, while food is more diverse and easier to come by. Clothing and shelter become less important, either completely or partially. Nowadays, from my own experience in this country, a few tools—a knife, an axe, a spade, a wheelbarrow, etc.—and for those who like to study, lamplight, paper, and a few books are almost as essential and can be obtained at a very low cost. Yet some, without much sense, travel to faraway, harsh places and spend ten to twenty years in trade just to survive—basically, to stay warm—and eventually die in New England. The very wealthy are not just kept comfortably warm; they're kept uncomfortably hot, as I mentioned before—they are, of course, cooked à la mode.

Most of the luxuries, and many of the so called comforts of life, are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind. With respect to luxuries and comforts, the wisest have ever lived a more simple and meagre life than the poor. The ancient philosophers, Chinese, Hindoo, Persian, and Greek, were a class than which none has been poorer in outward riches, none so rich in inward. We know not much about them. It is remarkable that we know so much of them as we do. The same is true of the more modern reformers and benefactors of their race. None can be an impartial or wise observer of human life but from the vantage ground of what we should call voluntary poverty. Of a life of luxury the fruit is luxury, whether in agriculture, or commerce, or literature, or art. There are nowadays professors of philosophy, but not philosophers. Yet it is admirable to profess because it was once admirable to live. To be a philosopher is not merely to have subtle thoughts, nor even to found a school, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity, and trust. It is to solve some of the problems of life, not only theoretically, but practically. The success of great scholars and thinkers is commonly a courtier-like success, not kingly, not manly. They make shift to live merely by conformity, practically as their fathers did, and are in no sense the progenitors of a nobler race of men. But why do men degenerate ever? What makes families run out? What is the nature of the luxury which enervates and destroys nations? Are we sure that there is none of it in our own lives? The philosopher is in advance of his age even in the outward form of his life. He is not fed, sheltered, clothed, warmed, like his contemporaries. How can a man be a philosopher and not maintain his vital heat by better methods than other men?

Most luxuries and many so-called comforts of life are not only unnecessary but also obstacles to the advancement of humanity. Regarding luxuries and comforts, the wisest have always lived a simpler and more modest life than the less fortunate. The ancient philosophers—Chinese, Indian, Persian, and Greek—were a group that had fewer external riches and yet was immensely wealthy internally. We don’t know a lot about them, which is remarkable given how much we do know. The same applies to more modern reformers and helpers of their communities. No one can be an unbiased or wise observer of human life without the perspective of what we might call voluntary poverty. A life of luxury yields only more luxury, whether in farming, business, literature, or art. Today we have professors of philosophy, but not true philosophers. However, it’s commendable to profess since it was once admirable to live that way. Being a philosopher isn’t just about having profound thoughts or even establishing a school; it’s about loving wisdom enough to live by its principles—a life of simplicity, independence, generosity, and trust. It means addressing some of life’s problems, not only in theory but in practice. The success of great scholars and thinkers is often superficial, more like that of courtiers than anything noble or manly. They manage to live by conforming, just like their ancestors did, and don’t contribute to a greater lineage of people. But why do people continually decline? What causes families to dwindle? What kind of luxury weakens and destroys nations? Are we sure there’s none of that in our own lives? The philosopher is ahead of his time even in the outward aspects of his life. He isn’t fed, sheltered, clothed, or warmed like his peers. How can someone be a philosopher and not sustain his warmth by better means than others?

When a man is warmed by the several modes which I have described, what does he want next? Surely not more warmth of the same kind, as more and richer food, larger and more splendid houses, finer and more abundant clothing, more numerous incessant and hotter fires, and the like. When he has obtained those things which are necessary to life, there is another alternative than to obtain the superfluities; and that is, to adventure on life now, his vacation from humbler toil having commenced. The soil, it appears, is suited to the seed, for it has sent its radicle downward, and it may now send its shoot upward also with confidence. Why has man rooted himself thus firmly in the earth, but that he may rise in the same proportion into the heavens above?—for the nobler plants are valued for the fruit they bear at last in the air and light, far from the ground, and are not treated like the humbler esculents, which, though they may be biennials, are cultivated only till they have perfected their root, and often cut down at top for this purpose, so that most would not know them in their flowering season.

When a man experiences the various ways I've described to feel comfortable, what does he want next? Definitely not more of the same warmth, but more and better food, bigger and nicer homes, nicer and more plentiful clothes, more frequent and hotter fires, and so on. Once he has what he needs to live, there's a choice beyond just getting extras; he can embark on life now, since he's on a break from less satisfying work. The ground seems prepared for the seed, as it has pushed its roots down, and now it can confidently send its shoot upward too. Why has man established himself so firmly on the earth if not to reach upward toward the heavens?—the more noble plants are appreciated for the fruit they eventually bear high in the air and light, far above the ground, and are not treated like the simpler vegetables, which, even if they last two years, are grown only until their roots are perfect, often cut back from the top for this reason, so that most wouldn't recognize them when they bloom.

I do not mean to prescribe rules to strong and valiant natures, who will mind their own affairs whether in heaven or hell, and perchance build more magnificently and spend more lavishly than the richest, without ever impoverishing themselves, not knowing how they live,—if, indeed, there are any such, as has been dreamed; nor to those who find their encouragement and inspiration in precisely the present condition of things, and cherish it with the fondness and enthusiasm of lovers,—and, to some extent, I reckon myself in this number; I do not speak to those who are well employed, in whatever circumstances, and they know whether they are well employed or not;—but mainly to the mass of men who are discontented, and idly complaining of the hardness of their lot or of the times, when they might improve them. There are some who complain most energetically and inconsolably of any, because they are, as they say, doing their duty. I also have in my mind that seemingly wealthy, but most terribly impoverished class of all, who have accumulated dross, but know not how to use it, or get rid of it, and thus have forged their own golden or silver fetters.

I don’t intend to set rules for strong and courageous people, who will manage their own lives whether in heaven or hell, and may build more grandly and spend more extravagantly than the wealthiest, without ever making themselves poor, not even realizing how they thrive—if such people exist as has been imagined; nor am I addressing those who find their motivation and inspiration in the current state of affairs and hold onto it with the affection and passion of lovers—and, to some extent, I include myself in that group; I’m not speaking to those who are productively engaged, regardless of their situation, as they know if they are truly engaged or not;—but mostly to the vast majority of people who are unhappy, and complaining idly about the difficulties in their lives or in the times, when they could be making improvements. There are some who complain most fervently and inconsolably about anything, because they believe they are doing their duty. I also have in mind that seemingly affluent, but deeply impoverished group of all, who have accumulated wealth but don’t know how to use it or dispose of it, and in doing so have created their own chains of gold or silver.

If I should attempt to tell how I have desired to spend my life in years past, it would probably surprise those of my readers who are somewhat acquainted with its actual history; it would certainly astonish those who know nothing about it. I will only hint at some of the enterprises which I have cherished.

If I try to describe how I've wanted to spend my life over the years, it would likely surprise some of you who know a bit about its actual history; it would definitely shock those who know nothing about it. I'll just hint at a few of the dreams I've held dear.

In any weather, at any hour of the day or night, I have been anxious to improve the nick of time, and notch it on my stick too; to stand on the meeting of two eternities, the past and future, which is precisely the present moment; to toe that line. You will pardon some obscurities, for there are more secrets in my trade than in most men’s, and yet not voluntarily kept, but inseparable from its very nature. I would gladly tell all that I know about it, and never paint “No Admittance” on my gate.

In any weather, at any hour of the day or night, I've been eager to make the most of every moment and mark it on my stick too; to stand at the intersection of two eternities, the past and future, which is exactly the present moment; to toe that line. Please excuse some unclear parts, as there are more mysteries in my trade than in most people's, and they're not kept on purpose but are just part of its nature. I'd be happy to share everything I know about it and never put up a "No Admittance" sign at my gate.

I long ago lost a hound, a bay horse, and a turtle-dove, and am still on their trail. Many are the travellers I have spoken concerning them, describing their tracks and what calls they answered to. I have met one or two who had heard the hound, and the tramp of the horse, and even seen the dove disappear behind a cloud, and they seemed as anxious to recover them as if they had lost them themselves.

I lost a hound, a bay horse, and a turtle dove long ago, and I'm still searching for them. I've talked to many travelers about it, describing their tracks and the calls they responded to. I've met one or two people who had heard the hound and the sound of the horse's hooves, and even seen the dove vanish behind a cloud. They seemed just as eager to help me find them as if they had lost them themselves.

To anticipate, not the sunrise and the dawn merely, but, if possible, Nature herself! How many mornings, summer and winter, before yet any neighbor was stirring about his business, have I been about mine! No doubt, many of my townsmen have met me returning from this enterprise, farmers starting for Boston in the twilight, or woodchoppers going to their work. It is true, I never assisted the sun materially in his rising, but, doubt not, it was of the last importance only to be present at it.

To look forward to not just the sunrise and the morning, but, if I can, Nature itself! How many mornings, both summer and winter, before any neighbors were up and about their routines, have I been focused on mine! I'm sure many of my fellow townspeople have seen me coming back from this venture, like farmers heading to Boston in the early light, or woodcutters off to do their jobs. It's true, I never really helped the sun rise, but trust me, it was still really important just to be there for it.

So many autumn, ay, and winter days, spent outside the town, trying to hear what was in the wind, to hear and carry it express! I well-nigh sunk all my capital in it, and lost my own breath into the bargain, running in the face of it. If it had concerned either of the political parties, depend upon it, it would have appeared in the Gazette with the earliest intelligence. At other times watching from the observatory of some cliff or tree, to telegraph any new arrival; or waiting at evening on the hill-tops for the sky to fall, that I might catch something, though I never caught much, and that, manna-wise, would dissolve again in the sun.

So many autumn and winter days were spent outside the town, trying to hear what was in the wind, to hear it and share it directly! I nearly lost all my savings to it and also lost my breath running into the wind. If it had involved either of the political parties, you can be sure it would have been announced in the Gazette with the earliest news. At other times, I’d watch from the top of a cliff or a tree to signal any new arrivals; or wait in the evening on the hilltops for something exciting to happen, hoping to catch something, even though I never caught much, and whatever I did catch would quickly dissolve in the sunlight like manna.

For a long time I was reporter to a journal, of no very wide circulation, whose editor has never yet seen fit to print the bulk of my contributions, and, as is too common with writers, I got only my labor for my pains. However, in this case my pains were their own reward.

For a long time, I worked as a reporter for a journal with a pretty limited audience, whose editor has never bothered to publish most of my contributions. Like many writers, I ended up with just my effort for my trouble. Still, in this case, my efforts were their own reward.

For many years I was self-appointed inspector of snow storms and rain storms, and did my duty faithfully; surveyor, if not of highways, then of forest paths and all across-lot routes, keeping them open, and ravines bridged and passable at all seasons, where the public heel had testified to their utility.

For many years, I took it upon myself to inspect snowstorms and rainstorms, and I did my job faithfully; I was a surveyor, if not of highways, then of forest paths and all the shortcuts between properties, making sure they were open and that the ravines were bridged and passable at all times, as evidenced by the public foot traffic showing their usefulness.

I have looked after the wild stock of the town, which give a faithful herdsman a good deal of trouble by leaping fences; and I have had an eye to the unfrequented nooks and corners of the farm; though I did not always know whether Jonas or Solomon worked in a particular field to-day; that was none of my business. I have watered the red huckleberry, the sand cherry and the nettle tree, the red pine and the black ash, the white grape and the yellow violet, which might have withered else in dry seasons.

I have taken care of the wild livestock in town, which can give a dedicated herder quite a bit of trouble by jumping fences; and I have paid attention to the overlooked spots around the farm; although I didn’t always know whether Jonas or Solomon worked in a specific field today; that wasn’t my concern. I have watered the red huckleberry, the sand cherry, and the nettle tree, along with the red pine, black ash, white grape, and yellow violet, which might have dried up otherwise during dry spells.

In short, I went on thus for a long time, I may say it without boasting, faithfully minding my business, till it became more and more evident that my townsmen would not after all admit me into the list of town officers, nor make my place a sinecure with a moderate allowance. My accounts, which I can swear to have kept faithfully, I have, indeed, never got audited, still less accepted, still less paid and settled. However, I have not set my heart on that.

In short, I went on like this for a long time, and I say this without bragging, faithfully taking care of my responsibilities, until it became clearer and clearer that my fellow townspeople would not actually include me in the list of town officers, nor would they make my position an easy one with a decent salary. My accounts, which I can swear I kept diligently, have never been audited, let alone accepted, or paid and settled. However, I haven't really focused on that.

Not long since, a strolling Indian went to sell baskets at the house of a well-known lawyer in my neighborhood. “Do you wish to buy any baskets?” he asked. “No, we do not want any,” was the reply. “What!” exclaimed the Indian as he went out the gate, “do you mean to starve us?” Having seen his industrious white neighbors so well off,—that the lawyer had only to weave arguments, and by some magic, wealth and standing followed, he had said to himself; I will go into business; I will weave baskets; it is a thing which I can do. Thinking that when he had made the baskets he would have done his part, and then it would be the white man’s to buy them. He had not discovered that it was necessary for him to make it worth the other’s while to buy them, or at least make him think that it was so, or to make something else which it would be worth his while to buy. I too had woven a kind of basket of a delicate texture, but I had not made it worth any one’s while to buy them. Yet not the less, in my case, did I think it worth my while to weave them, and instead of studying how to make it worth men’s while to buy my baskets, I studied rather how to avoid the necessity of selling them. The life which men praise and regard as successful is but one kind. Why should we exaggerate any one kind at the expense of the others?

Not long ago, an Indian man was out selling baskets at the home of a well-known lawyer in my neighborhood. “Are you interested in buying any baskets?” he asked. “No, we don’t want any,” was the answer. “What!” the Indian exclaimed as he walked out the gate, “do you mean to starve us?” Having seen his hardworking white neighbors doing so well—where the lawyer only had to craft arguments, and wealth and status magically followed—he thought to himself, I’ll start a business; I’ll weave baskets; that’s something I can do. He believed that once he made the baskets, he’d done his part, and then it was up to the white man to buy them. He hadn’t realized that he needed to make it appealing for the other person to want to buy them, or at least make him think it was worth it, or create something else that would truly be worth buying. I too had woven a kind of basket, delicately made, but I hadn’t made it enticing for anyone to buy. Still, I thought it was worth my time to weave them; instead of figuring out how to make it worth others' while to buy my baskets, I focused on how to avoid having to sell them. The life that people praise and see as successful is just one type. Why should we elevate one type at the expense of all the others?

Finding that my fellow-citizens were not likely to offer me any room in the court house, or any curacy or living any where else, but I must shift for myself, I turned my face more exclusively than ever to the woods, where I was better known. I determined to go into business at once, and not wait to acquire the usual capital, using such slender means as I had already got. My purpose in going to Walden Pond was not to live cheaply nor to live dearly there, but to transact some private business with the fewest obstacles; to be hindered from accomplishing which for want of a little common sense, a little enterprise and business talent, appeared not so sad as foolish.

Finding that my fellow citizens were unlikely to offer me any space in the courthouse, or any job anywhere else, I realized I had to fend for myself. I decided to focus even more on the woods, where I was better known. I was determined to start a business right away, without waiting to gather the usual amount of capital, using whatever limited resources I already had. My intention in going to Walden Pond wasn’t to live cheaply or expensively, but to handle some personal matters with the fewest obstacles. The fact that I was hindered from achieving this due to a lack of common sense, a bit of initiative, and some business smarts seemed not so much tragic as foolish.

I have always endeavored to acquire strict business habits; they are indispensable to every man. If your trade is with the Celestial Empire, then some small counting house on the coast, in some Salem harbor, will be fixture enough. You will export such articles as the country affords, purely native products, much ice and pine timber and a little granite, always in native bottoms. These will be good ventures. To oversee all the details yourself in person; to be at once pilot and captain, and owner and underwriter; to buy and sell and keep the accounts; to read every letter received, and write or read every letter sent; to superintend the discharge of imports night and day; to be upon many parts of the coast almost at the same time;—often the richest freight will be discharged upon a Jersey shore;—to be your own telegraph, unweariedly sweeping the horizon, speaking all passing vessels bound coastwise; to keep up a steady despatch of commodities, for the supply of such a distant and exorbitant market; to keep yourself informed of the state of the markets, prospects of war and peace every where, and anticipate the tendencies of trade and civilization,—taking advantage of the results of all exploring expeditions, using new passages and all improvements in navigation;—charts to be studied, the position of reefs and new lights and buoys to be ascertained, and ever, and ever, the logarithmic tables to be corrected, for by the error of some calculator the vessel often splits upon a rock that should have reached a friendly pier,—there is the untold fate of La Perouse;—universal science to be kept pace with, studying the lives of all great discoverers and navigators, great adventurers and merchants, from Hanno and the Phœnicians down to our day; in fine, account of stock to be taken from time to time, to know how you stand. It is a labor to task the faculties of a man,—such problems of profit and loss, of interest, of tare and tret, and gauging of all kinds in it, as demand a universal knowledge.

I’ve always tried to develop solid business habits; they’re essential for everyone. If your business involves trading with China, then a small office on the coast, in a harbor like Salem, will be sufficient. You’ll export products that the country offers—mainly native goods, lots of ice, pine timber, and a little granite, always shipped on native vessels. These will be good business moves. You need to oversee all the details yourself; to be the pilot, captain, owner, and underwriter; to buy and sell and keep track of the accounts; to read every letter received and write or read every letter sent; to supervise the unloading of imports day and night; to be on multiple parts of the coast almost simultaneously—often the best cargo will be unloaded on the Jersey shore. You’ll be your own telegraph, tirelessly scanning the horizon, checking on all passing ships heading along the coast; to maintain a steady flow of goods for such a distant and demanding market; to stay informed about market conditions, prospects of war and peace everywhere, and anticipate trade trends and civilization developments—taking advantage of the results of all exploration missions, using new routes and all navigation improvements; you need to study charts, determine the positions of reefs, new lights, and buoys, and continually correct logarithmic tables, because errors from any calculator can cause a ship to crash on a rock that should have reached a safe harbor—just look at the fate of La Perouse; you need to keep up with universal science, studying the lives of great explorers and navigators, adventurers and merchants, from Hanno and the Phoenicians to today; in short, you need to take stock from time to time to know where you stand. It’s a task that challenges a person’s abilities—dealing with problems of profit and loss, interest, calculations, and measurements of all kinds that require broad knowledge.

I have thought that Walden Pond would be a good place for business, not solely on account of the railroad and the ice trade; it offers advantages which it may not be good policy to divulge; it is a good port and a good foundation. No Neva marshes to be filled; though you must every where build on piles of your own driving. It is said that a flood-tide, with a westerly wind, and ice in the Neva, would sweep St. Petersburg from the face of the earth.

I think Walden Pond would be a great spot for business, not just because of the railroad and the ice trade; it has benefits that might be wise to keep to ourselves. It's a solid port and a strong base. There are no marshes like the Neva to deal with, even though you'd have to build on your own piles everywhere. It's said that a high tide with a west wind and ice in the Neva could wash St. Petersburg away completely.

As this business was to be entered into without the usual capital, it may not be easy to conjecture where those means, that will still be indispensable to every such undertaking, were to be obtained. As for Clothing, to come at once to the practical part of the question, perhaps we are led oftener by the love of novelty, and a regard for the opinions of men, in procuring it, than by a true utility. Let him who has work to do recollect that the object of clothing is, first, to retain the vital heat, and secondly, in this state of society, to cover nakedness, and he may judge how much of any necessary or important work may be accomplished without adding to his wardrobe. Kings and queens who wear a suit but once, though made by some tailor or dressmaker to their majesties, cannot know the comfort of wearing a suit that fits. They are no better than wooden horses to hang the clean clothes on. Every day our garments become more assimilated to ourselves, receiving the impress of the wearer’s character, until we hesitate to lay them aside, without such delay and medical appliances and some such solemnity even as our bodies. No man ever stood the lower in my estimation for having a patch in his clothes; yet I am sure that there is greater anxiety, commonly, to have fashionable, or at least clean and unpatched clothes, than to have a sound conscience. But even if the rent is not mended, perhaps the worst vice betrayed is improvidence. I sometimes try my acquaintances by such tests as this;—who could wear a patch, or two extra seams only, over the knee? Most behave as if they believed that their prospects for life would be ruined if they should do it. It would be easier for them to hobble to town with a broken leg than with a broken pantaloon. Often if an accident happens to a gentleman’s legs, they can be mended; but if a similar accident happens to the legs of his pantaloons, there is no help for it; for he considers, not what is truly respectable, but what is respected. We know but few men, a great many coats and breeches. Dress a scarecrow in your last shift, you standing shiftless by, who would not soonest salute the scarecrow? Passing a cornfield the other day, close by a hat and coat on a stake, I recognized the owner of the farm. He was only a little more weather-beaten than when I saw him last. I have heard of a dog that barked at every stranger who approached his master’s premises with clothes on, but was easily quieted by a naked thief. It is an interesting question how far men would retain their relative rank if they were divested of their clothes. Could you, in such a case, tell surely of any company of civilized men, which belonged to the most respected class? When Madam Pfeiffer, in her adventurous travels round the world, from east to west, had got so near home as Asiatic Russia, she says that she felt the necessity of wearing other than a travelling dress, when she went to meet the authorities, for she “was now in a civilized country, where —— — people are judged of by their clothes.” Even in our democratic New England towns the accidental possession of wealth, and its manifestation in dress and equipage alone, obtain for the possessor almost universal respect. But they yield such respect, numerous as they are, are so far heathen, and need to have a missionary sent to them. Beside, clothes introduced sewing, a kind of work which you may call endless; a woman’s dress, at least, is never done.

As this business is to be started without the usual funds, it might be hard to guess where the necessary resources, which are crucial for every such venture, are going to come from. When it comes to clothing, getting straight to the practical side of things, we might often be driven more by the desire for something new and the opinions of others than by real usefulness. Those who have work to do should remember that the purpose of clothing is, first, to keep us warm, and second, in today's society, to cover up our bodies. Then they can consider how much important work can be done without buying new clothes. Kings and queens who wear a suit just once, even if made by a top tailor, can’t truly appreciate the comfort of wearing something that fits well. They’re no more useful than wooden mannequins for hanging clean clothes on. Every day, our outfits become more like us, reflecting our character, to the point that we hesitate to part with them, going through a long process as if it were a serious medical procedure, similar to how we treat our bodies. No guy has ever seemed less respectable to me for having a patch on his clothes; however, there's often more concern over having fashionable or at least clean and unpatched clothes than over having a clear conscience. But even if the tear isn’t fixed, perhaps the biggest flaw shown is thoughtlessness. I sometimes test my friends with situations like this: who among them could wear a patch or have a couple of extra seams in their pants? Most act like they believe their futures would be ruined if they did. They’d rather limp to town with a broken leg than with a ripped pair of pants. Often if something happens to a gentleman’s legs, they can be fixed; but if a similar problem occurs with his pants, it’s considered hopeless, as he focuses not on what is truly respectable but on what is socially respected. We know very few men, but many coats and trousers. If you dressed a scarecrow in your old clothes while standing there without any, who would greet the scarecrow first? Passing a cornfield the other day, I saw a hat and coat on a stake and recognized the farmer. He looked just a bit more worn than the last time I saw him. I heard about a dog that barked at every stranger approaching its owner’s property wearing clothes, but calmed down easily at the sight of a naked thief. It's an intriguing thought how much people would keep their social status if they were stripped of their clothes. In that case, could you accurately tell which group of civilized men belonged to the highest class? When Madam Pfeiffer traveled around the world from east to west, she mentioned that as she got close to home in Asiatic Russia, she felt the need to wear something other than travel clothes when meeting the authorities because “she was now in a civilized country, where people are judged by their clothes.” Even in our democratic New England towns, the random possession of wealth, displayed through clothing and personal items, grants the owner almost universal respect. But those who give that respect, as many as there are, are somewhat barbaric and need someone to enlighten them. Moreover, clothes introduced sewing, a never-ending task; a woman's dress, at least, is never really finished.

A man who has at length found something to do will not need to get a new suit to do it in; for him the old will do, that has lain dusty in the garret for an indeterminate period. Old shoes will serve a hero longer than they have served his valet,—if a hero ever has a valet,—bare feet are older than shoes, and he can make them do. Only they who go to soirées and legislative halls must have new coats, coats to change as often as the man changes in them. But if my jacket and trousers, my hat and shoes, are fit to worship God in, they will do; will they not? Who ever saw his old clothes,—his old coat, actually worn out, resolved into its primitive elements, so that it was not a deed of charity to bestow it on some poor boy, by him perchance to be bestowed on some poorer still, or shall we say richer, who could do with less? I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. If there is not a new man, how can the new clothes be made to fit? If you have any enterprise before you, try it in your old clothes. All men want, not something to do with, but something to do, or rather something to be. Perhaps we should never procure a new suit, however ragged or dirty the old, until we have so conducted, so enterprised or sailed in some way, that we feel like new men in the old, and that to retain it would be like keeping new wine in old bottles. Our moulting season, like that of the fowls, must be a crisis in our lives. The loon retires to solitary ponds to spend it. Thus also the snake casts its slough, and the caterpillar its wormy coat, by an internal industry and expansion; for clothes are but our outmost cuticle and mortal coil. Otherwise we shall be found sailing under false colors, and be inevitably cashiered at last by our own opinion, as well as that of mankind.

A man who finally has something to do won't need a new suit for it; his old one will do just fine, even if it’s been collecting dust in the attic for ages. Old shoes can serve a hero longer than they’ve served his servant—if a hero even has a servant—bare feet are older than shoes, and he can manage with them. Only those who attend parties and legislative meetings need new coats, and they change them as often as they change themselves. But if my jacket and pants, my hat and shoes, are good enough to go to church in, they’ll work, right? Who has ever seen their old clothes—an old coat that’s truly worn out, broken down to its basic materials, making it no act of charity to give it to a poor boy, who might pass it on to someone even poorer, or shall we say richer, who could make do with less? I say beware of any ventures that require new clothes instead of a new person to wear them. If there isn’t a new person, how can the new clothes possibly fit? If you have a project ahead, try it in your old clothes. All men want not just something to do with, but something to do, or more importantly, something to be. Perhaps we should never buy a new suit, no matter how ragged or dirty the old one is, until we’ve managed to act, initiate, or navigate in some way that makes us feel like new men in the old clothes, so that keeping them would be like storing new wine in old bottles. Our shedding season, like that of birds, should be a pivotal moment in our lives. The loon retreats to quiet ponds to do this. Likewise, the snake sheds its skin, and the caterpillar sheds its messy coat, through internal growth and change; after all, clothes are just our outer layer and earthly burdens. Otherwise, we’ll be found sailing under false pretenses and inevitably dismissed by our own judgment, as well as that of society.

We don garment after garment, as if we grew like exogenous plants by addition without. Our outside and often thin and fanciful clothes are our epidermis, or false skin, which partakes not of our life, and may be stripped off here and there without fatal injury; our thicker garments, constantly worn, are our cellular integument, or cortex; but our shirts are our liber or true bark, which cannot be removed without girdling and so destroying the man. I believe that all races at some seasons wear something equivalent to the shirt. It is desirable that a man be clad so simply that he can lay his hands on himself in the dark, and that he live in all respects so compactly and preparedly, that, if an enemy take the town, he can, like the old philosopher, walk out the gate empty-handed without anxiety. While one thick garment is, for most purposes, as good as three thin ones, and cheap clothing can be obtained at prices really to suit customers; while a thick coat can be bought for five dollars, which will last as many years, thick pantaloons for two dollars, cowhide boots for a dollar and a half a pair, a summer hat for a quarter of a dollar, and a winter cap for sixty-two and a half cents, or a better be made at home at a nominal cost, where is he so poor that, clad in such a suit, of his own earning, there will not be found wise men to do him reverence?

We put on layer after layer of clothing, as if we were like plants growing from outside additions. Our outer clothes, often light and fancy, are like a second skin that doesn’t really connect to our life and can be removed without causing harm; our thicker clothes that we wear all the time serve as our protective layer; but our shirts are our true skin, which we can’t take off without damaging ourselves. I think people from all cultures have something akin to a shirt at different times. It’s best for someone to dress simply enough that they can find their clothes in the dark and to live in a way that’s so organized that if an enemy were to attack, they could leave the place without worrying, just like the old philosopher. While one warm coat is just as good as three thin ones for most needs, and affordable clothing is available at reasonable prices; one can buy a sturdy coat for five dollars that lasts for years, durable pants for two dollars, sturdy boots for a dollar and a half, a summer hat for twenty-five cents, and a warm winter cap for sixty-two and a half cents, or even make a better one at home for very little cost, who is so poor that, dressed in such an outfit made from his own earnings, won’t earn the respect of wise men?

When I ask for a garment of a particular form, my tailoress tells me gravely, “They do not make them so now,” not emphasizing the “They” at all, as if she quoted an authority as impersonal as the Fates, and I find it difficult to get made what I want, simply because she cannot believe that I mean what I say, that I am so rash. When I hear this oracular sentence, I am for a moment absorbed in thought, emphasizing to myself each word separately that I may come at the meaning of it, that I may find out by what degree of consanguinity They are related to me, and what authority they may have in an affair which affects me so nearly; and, finally, I am inclined to answer her with equal mystery, and without any more emphasis of the “they,”—“It is true, they did not make them so recently, but they do now.” Of what use this measuring of me if she does not measure my character, but only the breadth of my shoulders, as it were a peg to hang the coat on? We worship not the Graces, nor the Parcæ, but Fashion. She spins and weaves and cuts with full authority. The head monkey at Paris puts on a traveller’s cap, and all the monkeys in America do the same. I sometimes despair of getting anything quite simple and honest done in this world by the help of men. They would have to be passed through a powerful press first, to squeeze their old notions out of them, so that they would not soon get upon their legs again, and then there would be some one in the company with a maggot in his head, hatched from an egg deposited there nobody knows when, for not even fire kills these things, and you would have lost your labor. Nevertheless, we will not forget that some Egyptian wheat was handed down to us by a mummy.

When I ask for a specific style of clothing, my tailor seriously responds, “They don’t make them like that anymore,” not putting any emphasis on “They,” as if she’s quoting an impersonal authority, like the Fates. It’s hard for me to get what I want because she can't believe I really mean it, that I’m being so bold. When I hear this cryptic statement, I find myself lost in thought, breaking down each word to discover its meaning, to figure out how closely “They” are related to “me,” and what right they have in a matter that affects me so directly. Eventually, I feel tempted to reply with equal mystery, not emphasizing “they” this time: “It’s true, they didn’t make them that way recently, but they do now.” What’s the point of her sizing me up if she doesn’t judge my character but only measures my shoulders, treating me like just a coat hanger? We don’t worship the Graces or the Fates; we worship Fashion. It creates, designs, and dictates with full authority. The top designer in Paris puts on a traveler’s cap, and suddenly, all the fashionistas in America follow suit. Sometimes I despair of getting anything simple and genuine done in this world by men. They’d need to be put through a powerful press first to squeeze out their outdated ideas, so they wouldn’t quickly revive them, and even then, someone in the mix would have a strange notion in their head, a belief that no one knows when it was formed, because not even fire can get rid of these thoughts, and you’d have wasted your efforts. Still, let’s not forget that some Egyptian wheat was passed down to us by a mummy.

On the whole, I think that it cannot be maintained that dressing has in this or any country risen to the dignity of an art. At present men make shift to wear what they can get. Like shipwrecked sailors, they put on what they can find on the beach, and at a little distance, whether of space or time, laugh at each other’s masquerade. Every generation laughs at the old fashions, but follows religiously the new. We are amused at beholding the costume of Henry VIII., or Queen Elizabeth, as much as if it was that of the King and Queen of the Cannibal Islands. All costume off a man is pitiful or grotesque. It is only the serious eye peering from and the sincere life passed within it, which restrain laughter and consecrate the costume of any people. Let Harlequin be taken with a fit of the colic and his trappings will have to serve that mood too. When the soldier is hit by a cannon ball rags are as becoming as purple.

Overall, I don’t think you can say that dressing has, in this or any country, become an art form. Right now, people just make do with what they can find. Like shipwrecked sailors, they wear whatever they can pick up on the beach, and from a bit of a distance, whether in space or time, they laugh at each other's outfits. Each generation chuckles at old styles but eagerly follows new trends. We find the clothing of Henry VIII or Queen Elizabeth just as amusing as if it belonged to the King and Queen of the Cannibal Islands. Every outfit off a man looks sad or ridiculous. It’s only the serious gaze looking out from it and the genuine life lived within that hold back laughter and elevate the attire of any culture. If Harlequin suddenly gets a stomachache, his costume will have to fit that mood too. When a soldier is struck by a cannonball, rags look just as good as royal purple.

The childish and savage taste of men and women for new patterns keeps how many shaking and squinting through kaleidoscopes that they may discover the particular figure which this generation requires today. The manufacturers have learned that this taste is merely whimsical. Of two patterns which differ only by a few threads more or less of a particular color, the one will be sold readily, the other lie on the shelf, though it frequently happens that after the lapse of a season the latter becomes the most fashionable. Comparatively, tattooing is not the hideous custom which it is called. It is not barbarous merely because the printing is skin-deep and unalterable.

The childish and savage desire of people for new styles keeps many shaking and squinting through kaleidoscopes to find the specific design that this generation wants today. Manufacturers have realized that this desire is just fickle. Of two designs that differ by only a few threads of a certain color, one will sell well while the other collects dust, even though it often turns out that after a season, the latter becomes the most fashionable. In comparison, tattooing isn’t the terrible practice it’s made out to be. It isn't barbaric just because the ink is skin-deep and permanent.

I cannot believe that our factory system is the best mode by which men may get clothing. The condition of the operatives is becoming every day more like that of the English; and it cannot be wondered at, since, as far as I have heard or observed, the principal object is, not that mankind may be well and honestly clad, but, unquestionably, that corporations may be enriched. In the long run men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, though they should fail immediately, they had better aim at something high.

I can’t believe our factory system is the best way for people to get clothing. The workers’ situation is becoming more like that of the English every day, and it’s not surprising because, from what I’ve seen or heard, the main goal isn’t to ensure people are well and fairly dressed, but definitely to make corporations richer. In the long run, people only achieve what they aim for. So, even if they fail right away, it’s better to aim high.

As for a Shelter, I will not deny that this is now a necessary of life, though there are instances of men having done without it for long periods in colder countries than this. Samuel Laing says that “the Laplander in his skin dress, and in a skin bag which he puts over his head and shoulders, will sleep night after night on the snow—in a degree of cold which would extinguish the life of one exposed to it in any woollen clothing.” He had seen them asleep thus. Yet he adds, “They are not hardier than other people.” But, probably, man did not live long on the earth without discovering the convenience which there is in a house, the domestic comforts, which phrase may have originally signified the satisfactions of the house more than of the family; though these must be extremely partial and occasional in those climates where the house is associated in our thoughts with winter or the rainy season chiefly, and two thirds of the year, except for a parasol, is unnecessary. In our climate, in the summer, it was formerly almost solely a covering at night. In the Indian gazettes a wigwam was the symbol of a day’s march, and a row of them cut or painted on the bark of a tree signified that so many times they had camped. Man was not made so large limbed and robust but that he must seek to narrow his world, and wall in a space such as fitted him. He was at first bare and out of doors; but though this was pleasant enough in serene and warm weather, by daylight, the rainy season and the winter, to say nothing of the torrid sun, would perhaps have nipped his race in the bud if he had not made haste to clothe himself with the shelter of a house. Adam and Eve, according to the fable, wore the bower before other clothes. Man wanted a home, a place of warmth, or comfort, first of physical warmth, then the warmth of the affections.

When it comes to shelter, I can't deny that it's a basic necessity today, although there are examples of people living without it for long periods in colder places than this. Samuel Laing mentions that "the Laplander, in his skin clothing and using a skin bag over his head and shoulders, can sleep night after night on the snow in conditions that would kill someone else wearing wool." He has seen them asleep like this. Still, he notes, "They are not hardier than other people." But it's likely that humans didn’t live long on earth without realizing the convenience of having a house, and the domestic comforts it brings—though that term might have originally referred more to the joys of the house itself rather than the family. These comforts might be quite limited and temporary in climates where the house is mainly linked with winter or the rainy season, while two-thirds of the year, apart from using a parasol, you'd hardly need one. In our climate, during the summer, it used to be mainly a place to sleep at night. In Indian reports, a wigwam symbolized a day's journey, and a series of them drawn or painted on a tree indicated how many times they had camped. Humans weren't built to be so large and strong that they didn't need to create a smaller, enclosed space just for themselves. Initially, they were exposed and outdoors; while that was fine during pleasant and warm weather, exposure to the rainy season and winter, not to mention the scorching sun, could have wiped them out if they hadn’t quickly figured out how to build shelter. According to the story, Adam and Eve had a garden before they wore any clothes. Humans craved a home, a place of warmth and comfort—starting with physical warmth, and then the warmth of relationships.

We may imagine a time when, in the infancy of the human race, some enterprising mortal crept into a hollow in a rock for shelter. Every child begins the world again, to some extent, and loves to stay out doors, even in wet and cold. It plays house, as well as horse, having an instinct for it. Who does not remember the interest with which when young he looked at shelving rocks, or any approach to a cave? It was the natural yearning of that portion of our most primitive ancestor which still survived in us. From the cave we have advanced to roofs of palm leaves, of bark and boughs, of linen woven and stretched, of grass and straw, of boards and shingles, of stones and tiles. At last, we know not what it is to live in the open air, and our lives are domestic in more senses than we think. From the hearth to the field is a great distance. It would be well perhaps if we were to spend more of our days and nights without any obstruction between us and the celestial bodies, if the poet did not speak so much from under a roof, or the saint dwell there so long. Birds do not sing in caves, nor do doves cherish their innocence in dovecots.

We can picture a time when, in the early days of humanity, some adventurous person took shelter in a hollow in a rock. Every child kind of starts the world over again, to an extent, and loves to be outside, even when it's wet and cold. They play house as well as horse, having a natural instinct for it. Who doesn’t remember the fascination with which we looked at overhanging rocks or any hint of a cave when we were young? It was the natural pull of that part of our most primitive ancestor that still exists in us. From caves, we've progressed to roofs made of palm leaves, bark, branches, woven linen, grass, straw, boards, shingles, stones, and tiles. In the end, we don't really know what it's like to live outdoors, and our lives are more domestic than we realize. There’s a significant gap between the hearth and the field. Perhaps it would be better if we spent more of our days and nights with nothing between us and the stars, if poets didn’t speak so much from under a roof, or if saints didn’t dwell there for so long. Birds don’t sing in caves, nor do doves keep their innocence in dovecots.

However, if one designs to construct a dwelling house, it behooves him to exercise a little Yankee shrewdness, lest after all he find himself in a workhouse, a labyrinth without a clue, a museum, an almshouse, a prison, or a splendid mausoleum instead. Consider first how slight a shelter is absolutely necessary. I have seen Penobscot Indians, in this town, living in tents of thin cotton cloth, while the snow was nearly a foot deep around them, and I thought that they would be glad to have it deeper to keep out the wind. Formerly, when how to get my living honestly, with freedom left for my proper pursuits, was a question which vexed me even more than it does now, for unfortunately I am become somewhat callous, I used to see a large box by the railroad, six feet long by three wide, in which the laborers locked up their tools at night, and it suggested to me that every man who was hard pushed might get such a one for a dollar, and, having bored a few auger holes in it, to admit the air at least, get into it when it rained and at night, and hook down the lid, and so have freedom in his love, and in his soul be free. This did not appear the worst, nor by any means a despicable alternative. You could sit up as late as you pleased, and, whenever you got up, go abroad without any landlord or house-lord dogging you for rent. Many a man is harassed to death to pay the rent of a larger and more luxurious box who would not have frozen to death in such a box as this. I am far from jesting. Economy is a subject which admits of being treated with levity, but it cannot so be disposed of. A comfortable house for a rude and hardy race, that lived mostly out of doors, was once made here almost entirely of such materials as Nature furnished ready to their hands. Gookin, who was superintendent of the Indians subject to the Massachusetts Colony, writing in 1674, says, “The best of their houses are covered very neatly, tight and warm, with barks of trees, slipped from their bodies at those seasons when the sap is up, and made into great flakes, with pressure of weighty timber, when they are green.... The meaner sort are covered with mats which they make of a kind of bulrush, and are also indifferently tight and warm, but not so good as the former.... Some I have seen, sixty or a hundred feet long and thirty feet broad.... I have often lodged in their wigwams, and found them as warm as the best English houses.” He adds, that they were commonly carpeted and lined within with well-wrought embroidered mats, and were furnished with various utensils. The Indians had advanced so far as to regulate the effect of the wind by a mat suspended over the hole in the roof and moved by a string. Such a lodge was in the first instance constructed in a day or two at most, and taken down and put up in a few hours; and every family owned one, or its apartment in one.

However, if someone plans to build a house, it’s wise for them to be a bit shrewd, or they might end up in a workhouse, a confusing maze, a museum, a homeless shelter, a prison, or a grand tomb instead. First, consider how little shelter is actually needed. I’ve seen Penobscot Indians in this town living in tents made of thin cotton while the snow was almost a foot deep around them, and I thought they’d be happy if it got even deeper to block the wind. Back when figuring out how to earn a living honestly while still having time for my own pursuits troubled me more than it does now—unfortunately, I've grown somewhat indifferent—I used to notice a large box by the railroad, six feet long and three feet wide, where workers locked up their tools at night. It occurred to me that anyone in a tough spot could get a box like that for a dollar, drill a few holes for air, get inside during the rain or at night, close the lid, and thus find freedom in love and in spirit. This didn’t seem terrible or unworthy at all. You could stay up as late as you wanted and leave whenever you wished without a landlord hounding you for rent. Many a man is driven to despair trying to pay rent for a bigger, fancier box who wouldn’t have frozen to death in such a box as this. I’m not joking. While you can take a light-hearted approach to budgeting, it deserves serious consideration. A comfortable house for a tough and resilient people, who mostly lived outdoors, was once built here almost entirely from the materials Nature provided. Gookin, who was the superintendent of the Indians under the Massachusetts Colony, wrote in 1674, “The best of their houses are covered very neatly, tightly, and warmly, with tree bark that is stripped from their trunks when the sap is rising and made into large flakes by pressing with heavy timber while they are still green.... The poorer ones are covered with mats made from a type of bulrush and are also reasonably tight and warm but not as good as the former.... Some I’ve seen were sixty to a hundred feet long and thirty feet wide.... I’ve often stayed in their wigwams and found them as warm as the best English houses.” He added that they were often carpeted and lined inside with finely made embroidered mats and equipped with various utensils. The Indians had even figured out how to control the wind's effect by using a mat hung over the hole in the roof, which could be adjusted with a string. Such a lodge could be built in a day or two at the most, and disassembled and rebuilt in a few hours; every family had one or a space within one.

In the savage state every family owns a shelter as good as the best, and sufficient for its coarser and simpler wants; but I think that I speak within bounds when I say that, though the birds of the air have their nests, and the foxes their holes, and the savages their wigwams, in modern civilized society not more than one half the families own a shelter. In the large towns and cities, where civilization especially prevails, the number of those who own a shelter is a very small fraction of the whole. The rest pay an annual tax for this outside garment of all, become indispensable summer and winter, which would buy a village of Indian wigwams, but now helps to keep them poor as long as they live. I do not mean to insist here on the disadvantage of hiring compared with owning, but it is evident that the savage owns his shelter because it costs so little, while the civilized man hires his commonly because he cannot afford to own it; nor can he, in the long run, any better afford to hire. But, answers one, by merely paying this tax the poor civilized man secures an abode which is a palace compared with the savage’s. An annual rent of from twenty-five to a hundred dollars, these are the country rates, entitles him to the benefit of the improvements of centuries, spacious apartments, clean paint and paper, Rumford fireplace, back plastering, Venetian blinds, copper pump, spring lock, a commodious cellar, and many other things. But how happens it that he who is said to enjoy these things is so commonly a poor civilized man, while the savage, who has them not, is rich as a savage? If it is asserted that civilization is a real advance in the condition of man,—and I think that it is, though only the wise improve their advantages,—it must be shown that it has produced better dwellings without making them more costly; and the cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life which is required to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long run. An average house in this neighborhood costs perhaps eight hundred dollars, and to lay up this sum will take from ten to fifteen years of the laborer’s life, even if he is not encumbered with a family;—estimating the pecuniary value of every man’s labor at one dollar a day, for if some receive more, others receive less;—so that he must have spent more than half his life commonly before his wigwam will be earned. If we suppose him to pay a rent instead, this is but a doubtful choice of evils. Would the savage have been wise to exchange his wigwam for a palace on these terms?

In the wild, every family has a home that is as good as the best and meets their basic needs. However, I think it’s safe to say that, although birds have their nests, foxes have their holes, and indigenous people have their wigwams, in today’s civilized society, less than half of families own a home. In big towns and cities, where civilization is most apparent, the number of people who own a home is just a tiny fraction of the total. The rest pay yearly taxes for this essential living space, which is necessary in both summer and winter, and the amount they spend could buy a village of Indian wigwams, yet it only keeps them poor throughout their lives. I'm not here to argue about the downsides of renting versus owning, but it’s clear that an indigenous person owns his shelter because it’s so cheap, while a modern person rents his because he can’t afford to buy it; in the long run, he can’t afford to rent either. Someone may argue that by simply paying this tax, the struggling modern individual secures a dwelling that’s much nicer than a savage’s home. An annual rent ranging from twenty-five to a hundred dollars—these are the country rates—grants him access to centuries of improvements, spacious rooms, clean paint and wallpaper, a Rumford fireplace, plastered walls, Venetian blinds, a copper pump, spring locks, a spacious cellar, and many other amenities. But why is it that the person who is said to enjoy these things is often a *poor* civilized individual, while the savage who lacks them is rich in his own way? If we argue that civilization truly improves the condition of humanity—and I believe it does, though only the wise truly benefit from their advantages—it must be proven that it has created better homes without making them more expensive. The cost of something is the amount of what I would call life that needs to be exchanged for it, either immediately or in the long haul. An average house in this area costs around eight hundred dollars, and saving that amount requires ten to fifteen years of a laborer’s life, even if he doesn’t have a family—assuming every individual’s work is valued at one dollar a day, since while some earn more, others earn less. This means he typically has to spend more than half of his life just to earn his own wigwam. If we consider that he pays rent instead, it’s just an uncertain choice of evils. Would the savage have been wise to trade his wigwam for a palace at these costs?

It may be guessed that I reduce almost the whole advantage of holding this superfluous property as a fund in store against the future, so far as the individual is concerned, mainly to the defraying of funeral expenses. But perhaps a man is not required to bury himself. Nevertheless this points to an important distinction between the civilized man and the savage; and, no doubt, they have designs on us for our benefit, in making the life of a civilized people an institution, in which the life of the individual is to a great extent absorbed, in order to preserve and perfect that of the race. But I wish to show at what a sacrifice this advantage is at present obtained, and to suggest that we may possibly so live as to secure all the advantage without suffering any of the disadvantage. What mean ye by saying that the poor ye have always with you, or that the fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge?

It can be assumed that I see almost all the benefit of owning this extra property as a way to save up for the future, mainly to cover funeral costs, as far as the individual is concerned. However, perhaps a person shouldn’t be obligated to fund their own burial. Still, this highlights an important distinction between civilized people and those who are not; undoubtedly, there are intentions behind this for our own good, as they turn the life of a civilized society into an institution, where individual lives are largely integrated to preserve and enhance that of the community. But I want to illustrate how much of a sacrifice this advantage currently requires and to propose that we might find a way to enjoy all the benefits without facing any of the downsides. What do you mean when you say that the poor will always be among you, or that the parents have eaten sour grapes, and now the children's teeth are set on edge?

“As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel.”

“As I live, says the Lord God, you will no longer have the opportunity to use this proverb in Israel.”

“Behold all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.”

“Look, all souls belong to me; the soul of the father is just like the soul of the son: the soul that sins will die.”

When I consider my neighbors, the farmers of Concord, who are at least as well off as the other classes, I find that for the most part they have been toiling twenty, thirty, or forty years, that they may become the real owners of their farms, which commonly they have inherited with encumbrances, or else bought with hired money,—and we may regard one third of that toil as the cost of their houses,—but commonly they have not paid for them yet. It is true, the encumbrances sometimes outweigh the value of the farm, so that the farm itself becomes one great encumbrance, and still a man is found to inherit it, being well acquainted with it, as he says. On applying to the assessors, I am surprised to learn that they cannot at once name a dozen in the town who own their farms free and clear. If you would know the history of these homesteads, inquire at the bank where they are mortgaged. The man who has actually paid for his farm with labor on it is so rare that every neighbor can point to him. I doubt if there are three such men in Concord. What has been said of the merchants, that a very large majority, even ninety-seven in a hundred, are sure to fail, is equally true of the farmers. With regard to the merchants, however, one of them says pertinently that a great part of their failures are not genuine pecuniary failures, but merely failures to fulfil their engagements, because it is inconvenient; that is, it is the moral character that breaks down. But this puts an infinitely worse face on the matter, and suggests, beside, that probably not even the other three succeed in saving their souls, but are perchance bankrupt in a worse sense than they who fail honestly. Bankruptcy and repudiation are the springboards from which much of our civilization vaults and turns its somersets, but the savage stands on the unelastic plank of famine. Yet the Middlesex Cattle Show goes off here with éclat annually, as if all the joints of the agricultural machine were suent.

When I think about my neighbors, the farmers of Concord, who are at least as well off as others, I see that they have often spent twenty, thirty, or forty years working hard to truly own their farms, which they typically inherited with debts or bought with borrowed money. We can consider a third of that effort as the cost of their homes, yet they usually haven't fully paid for them. It's true that sometimes the debts exceed the farm's value, turning the farm itself into a massive burden, but someone still inherits it, claiming to know it well. When I asked the assessors, I was surprised to find they couldn't quickly name a dozen people in town who own their farms outright. If you want to know the background of these properties, check with the bank where they are mortgaged. The person who has genuinely paid for their farm through their labor is so rare that every neighbor can point him out. I doubt there are even three such individuals in Concord. It's said about merchants that a significant majority, even ninety-seven out of a hundred, are bound to fail; the same applies to farmers. However, one merchant wisely notes that many of their failures aren't true financial failures but rather failures to meet their obligations because it's inconvenient, revealing a breakdown in moral character. This casts an even darker shadow on the situation and implies that perhaps not even the other three manage to save their integrity, possibly being bankrupt in a more troubling way than those who fail with honesty. Bankruptcy and defaulting are key aspects of how much of our society functions, but the savage struggles on the rigid board of starvation. Still, the Middlesex Cattle Show happens here each year with great fanfare, as if everything in the agricultural system is perfectly in sync.

The farmer is endeavoring to solve the problem of a livelihood by a formula more complicated than the problem itself. To get his shoestrings he speculates in herds of cattle. With consummate skill he has set his trap with a hair spring to catch comfort and independence, and then, as he turned away, got his own leg into it. This is the reason he is poor; and for a similar reason we are all poor in respect to a thousand savage comforts, though surrounded by luxuries. As Chapman sings,—

The farmer is trying to figure out a way to make a living with a formula that's more complex than the problem itself. To make some money, he's investing in herds of cattle. With great skill, he has set a trap with a hair trigger to catch comfort and independence, but then, as he turned away, he got his own leg caught in it. This is why he's poor; and for a similar reason, we're all lacking in a thousand basic comforts, even though we're surrounded by luxuries. As Chapman sings,—

“The false society of men—
        —for earthly greatness
All heavenly comforts rarefies to air.”

“The fake society of men—
        —for worldly success
Turns all heavenly joys into nothing.”

And when the farmer has got his house, he may not be the richer but the poorer for it, and it be the house that has got him. As I understand it, that was a valid objection urged by Momus against the house which Minerva made, that she “had not made it movable, by which means a bad neighborhood might be avoided;” and it may still be urged, for our houses are such unwieldy property that we are often imprisoned rather than housed in them; and the bad neighborhood to be avoided is our own scurvy selves. I know one or two families, at least, in this town, who, for nearly a generation, have been wishing to sell their houses in the outskirts and move into the village, but have not been able to accomplish it, and only death will set them free.

And when the farmer gets his house, he may not be richer but actually poorer because of it, and it may feel like the house owns him. As I understand, that was a valid point raised by Momus against the house that Minerva created: that she “hadn't made it movable, which would allow someone to avoid a bad neighborhood.” This point is still relevant because our houses are such heavy burdens that we often feel trapped in them instead of truly housed, and the bad neighborhood we want to avoid is our own awful selves. I know a couple of families in this town who, for almost a generation, have been trying to sell their houses on the outskirts and move into the village but haven't been able to do it, and only death will set them free.

Granted that the majority are able at last either to own or hire the modern house with all its improvements. While civilization has been improving our houses, it has not equally improved the men who are to inhabit them. It has created palaces, but it was not so easy to create noblemen and kings. And if the civilized man’s pursuits are no worthier than the savage’s, if he is employed the greater part of his life in obtaining gross necessaries and comforts merely, why should he have a better dwelling than the former?

Granted that the majority can finally either own or rent the modern house with all its upgrades. While society has improved our homes, it hasn't done the same for the people living in them. It has built palaces, but creating noblemen and kings was not so easy. And if the civilized man’s pursuits are no more worthy than those of the savage, if he spends most of his life just trying to acquire basic needs and comforts, why should he have a better place to live than the latter?

But how do the poor minority fare? Perhaps it will be found, that just in proportion as some have been placed in outward circumstances above the savage, others have been degraded below him. The luxury of one class is counterbalanced by the indigence of another. On the one side is the palace, on the other are the almshouse and “silent poor.” The myriads who built the pyramids to be the tombs of the Pharaohs were fed on garlic, and it may be were not decently buried themselves. The mason who finishes the cornice of the palace returns at night perchance to a hut not so good as a wigwam. It is a mistake to suppose that, in a country where the usual evidences of civilization exist, the condition of a very large body of the inhabitants may not be as degraded as that of savages. I refer to the degraded poor, not now to the degraded rich. To know this I should not need to look farther than to the shanties which every where border our railroads, that last improvement in civilization; where I see in my daily walks human beings living in sties, and all winter with an open door, for the sake of light, without any visible, often imaginable, wood pile, and the forms of both old and young are permanently contracted by the long habit of shrinking from cold and misery, and the development of all their limbs and faculties is checked. It certainly is fair to look at that class by whose labor the works which distinguish this generation are accomplished. Such too, to a greater or less extent, is the condition of the operatives of every denomination in England, which is the great workhouse of the world. Or I could refer you to Ireland, which is marked as one of the white or enlightened spots on the map. Contrast the physical condition of the Irish with that of the North American Indian, or the South Sea Islander, or any other savage race before it was degraded by contact with the civilized man. Yet I have no doubt that that people’s rulers are as wise as the average of civilized rulers. Their condition only proves what squalidness may consist with civilization. I hardly need refer now to the laborers in our Southern States who produce the staple exports of this country, and are themselves a staple production of the South. But to confine myself to those who are said to be in moderate circumstances.

But how do the poor minorities fare? It may turn out that as some people are raised above others, some are pushed down even further. The luxury enjoyed by one class is balanced by the poverty of another. On one side, you have the palace, and on the other, the almshouse and the “silent poor.” The countless workers who built the pyramids as tombs for the Pharaohs were fed on garlic, and they likely weren’t buried properly themselves. The mason who finishes the palace’s cornice might return at night to a hut that’s not much better than a wigwam. It’s a mistake to think that in a country where typical signs of civilization exist, a large portion of the population can't be as degraded as savages. I'm talking about the degraded poor, not the degraded rich. I don’t need to look any further than the shanties that line our railroads, which are a modern advancement in civilization; there, I see in my daily walks people living in squalor, often with their doors wide open all winter just for light, without any visible woodpile for heat, and both the old and young are physically stunted from a life spent avoiding cold and misery, limiting the growth of their bodies and minds. It’s certainly fair to examine the class whose labor makes the achievements of this generation possible. The same goes, to a greater or lesser degree, for workers of all kinds in England, which is essentially the world’s biggest workhouse. Or I could point you to Ireland, which is marked as one of the enlightened spots on the map. Compare the physical condition of the Irish to that of the North American Indian, the South Sea Islander, or any other uncivilized group before they were degraded by contact with the civilized world. Yet, I have no doubt that the rulers of that people are as wise as the average civilized rulers. Their situation merely shows how much squalor can exist alongside civilization. I hardly need to mention the laborers in our Southern States who produce the staple exports of this country and are themselves a staple product of the South. But I'll focus on those who are said to be in moderate circumstances.

Most men appear never to have considered what a house is, and are actually though needlessly poor all their lives because they think that they must have such a one as their neighbors have. As if one were to wear any sort of coat which the tailor might cut out for him, or, gradually leaving off palmleaf hat or cap of woodchuck skin, complain of hard times because he could not afford to buy him a crown! It is possible to invent a house still more convenient and luxurious than we have, which yet all would admit that man could not afford to pay for. Shall we always study to obtain more of these things, and not sometimes to be content with less? Shall the respectable citizen thus gravely teach, by precept and example, the necessity of the young man’s providing a certain number of superfluous glow-shoes, and umbrellas, and empty guest chambers for empty guests, before he dies? Why should not our furniture be as simple as the Arab’s or the Indian’s? When I think of the benefactors of the race, whom we have apotheosized as messengers from heaven, bearers of divine gifts to man, I do not see in my mind any retinue at their heels, any car-load of fashionable furniture. Or what if I were to allow—would it not be a singular allowance?—that our furniture should be more complex than the Arab’s, in proportion as we are morally and intellectually his superiors! At present our houses are cluttered and defiled with it, and a good housewife would sweep out the greater part into the dust hole, and not leave her morning’s work undone. Morning work! By the blushes of Aurora and the music of Memnon, what should be man’s morning work in this world? I had three pieces of limestone on my desk, but I was terrified to find that they required to be dusted daily, when the furniture of my mind was all undusted still, and I threw them out the window in disgust. How, then, could I have a furnished house? I would rather sit in the open air, for no dust gathers on the grass, unless where man has broken ground.

Most men seem to have never thought about what a home really is, and end up being unnecessarily poor their whole lives because they believe they need to have what their neighbors have. It’s like wearing any coat that a tailor decides to make for you, or gradually switching from a palm leaf hat or a woodchuck skin cap and complaining about tough times because you can’t afford a crown! We could create a home that is even more comfortable and luxurious than what we have, yet everyone would agree that no one could afford it. Should we always aim to acquire more possessions, instead of sometimes being satisfied with less? Should a respectable citizen really teach by example that a young man must have a certain number of unnecessary shoes, umbrellas, and empty guest rooms for guests who won’t show up before he dies? Why can’t our furniture be as basic as that of an Arab or an Indian? When I think of the great figures in our history, whom we’ve revered as gifts from the heavens, I don’t envision them accompanied by a bunch of stylish furniture. Or what if I were to suggest—would it not be an odd suggestion?—that our furniture should be more elaborate than the Arab’s, just because we are morally and intellectually superior to him! Right now, our homes are cluttered and polluted with it, and a good housewife would throw a lot of it out with the trash instead of leaving her morning chores unfinished. Morning chores! By the blush of dawn and the song of Memnon, what should man’s morning work be in this world? I had three pieces of limestone on my desk, but I was horrified to realize they needed daily dusting while the clutter in my mind remained untouched, so I threw them out the window in frustration. So, how could I have a furnished house? I’d rather sit outside, where no dust collects on the grass, unless man has disturbed the earth.

It is the luxurious and dissipated who set the fashions which the herd so diligently follow. The traveller who stops at the best houses, so called, soon discovers this, for the publicans presume him to be a Sardanapalus, and if he resigned himself to their tender mercies he would soon be completely emasculated. I think that in the railroad car we are inclined to spend more on luxury than on safety and convenience, and it threatens without attaining these to become no better than a modern drawing room, with its divans, and ottomans, and sun-shades, and a hundred other oriental things, which we are taking west with us, invented for the ladies of the harem and the effeminate natives of the Celestial Empire, which Jonathan should be ashamed to know the names of. I would rather sit on a pumpkin and have it all to myself than be crowded on a velvet cushion. I would rather ride on earth in an ox cart with a free circulation, than go to heaven in the fancy car of an excursion train and breathe a malaria all the way.

It's the wealthy and extravagant who dictate the trends that everyone else eagerly follows. A traveler staying at the so-called best places quickly realizes this, as the innkeepers assume he's someone wealthy and indulgent, and if he allows himself to be at their mercy, he'd soon feel completely weakened. I believe that in the train car, we tend to prioritize luxury over safety and comfort, and it risks becoming no different from a modern living room, filled with sofas, ottomans, sunshades, and a hundred other exotic items that we’re bringing west with us, originally designed for the ladies of the harem and the effeminate locals of the Celestial Empire, which anyone from America should be embarrassed to admit they know the names of. I'd prefer to sit on a pumpkin by myself than be crammed onto a velvet cushion. I'd rather travel on the ground in an ox cart with plenty of fresh air than go to heaven in a fancy excursion train while inhaling stagnation the entire way.

The very simplicity and nakedness of man’s life in the primitive ages imply this advantage at least, that they left him still but a sojourner in nature. When he was refreshed with food and sleep he contemplated his journey again. He dwelt, as it were, in a tent in this world, and was either threading the valleys, or crossing the plains, or climbing the mountain tops. But lo! men have become the tools of their tools. The man who independently plucked the fruits when he was hungry is become a farmer; and he who stood under a tree for shelter, a housekeeper. We now no longer camp as for a night, but have settled down on earth and forgotten heaven. We have adopted Christianity merely as an improved method of agri-culture. We have built for this world a family mansion, and for the next a family tomb. The best works of art are the expression of man’s struggle to free himself from this condition, but the effect of our art is merely to make this low state comfortable and that higher state to be forgotten. There is actually no place in this village for a work of fine art, if any had come down to us, to stand, for our lives, our houses and streets, furnish no proper pedestal for it. There is not a nail to hang a picture on, nor a shelf to receive the bust of a hero or a saint. When I consider how our houses are built and paid for, or not paid for, and their internal economy managed and sustained, I wonder that the floor does not give way under the visitor while he is admiring the gewgaws upon the mantel-piece, and let him through into the cellar, to some solid and honest though earthy foundation. I cannot but perceive that this so called rich and refined life is a thing jumped at, and I do not get on in the enjoyment of the fine arts which adorn it, my attention being wholly occupied with the jump; for I remember that the greatest genuine leap, due to human muscles alone, on record, is that of certain wandering Arabs, who are said to have cleared twenty-five feet on level ground. Without factitious support, man is sure to come to earth again beyond that distance. The first question which I am tempted to put to the proprietor of such great impropriety is, Who bolsters you? Are you one of the ninety-seven who fail, or of the three who succeed? Answer me these questions, and then perhaps I may look at your bawbles and find them ornamental. The cart before the horse is neither beautiful nor useful. Before we can adorn our houses with beautiful objects the walls must be stripped, and our lives must be stripped, and beautiful housekeeping and beautiful living be laid for a foundation: now, a taste for the beautiful is most cultivated out of doors, where there is no house and no housekeeper.

The simplicity and rawness of human life in earlier times at least had the advantage of keeping people as travelers in nature. After eating and resting, they would think about their journey again. They lived like they were camping in this world, either walking through valleys, crossing plains, or climbing mountains. But now, people have become the servants of their inventions. The person who once picked fruit when hungry has turned into a farmer, and the one who sought shelter under a tree is now a house owner. We no longer camp for just a night; we've settled down here and forgotten about heaven. We've taken on Christianity mainly as a better way to manage farming. We've built large homes for this life and tombs for the next. The finest artworks express humanity's struggle to escape this situation, yet the impact of our art only makes this lower state more comfortable while allowing us to forget the higher one. In this village, there's no place for any fine art that might have survived, as our lives, homes, and streets offer no suitable base for it. There isn’t a single nail to hang a picture on, or a shelf for the bust of a hero or saint. When I think about how our homes are built and financed, or not properly financed, and how their inner workings are managed, I wonder how the floor doesn’t cave in beneath the visitor admiring the trinkets on the mantelpiece, dropping him into the cellar to find a solid and honest, albeit earthy, foundation. I can’t help but see that this so-called rich and refined lifestyle is something that people leap at, and I find it hard to enjoy the fine arts that embellish it, as I’m entirely focused on the leap; I recall that the greatest recorded jump purely due to human effort is one made by certain wandering Arabs, said to have cleared twenty-five feet on flat ground. Without artificial support, humans are bound to return to the ground beyond that distance. The first question that comes to mind for someone indulging in such excess is: Who supports you? Are you one of the ninety-seven who fail, or one of the three who succeed? Answer these questions, and maybe I could appreciate your decorations and find them appealing. Putting the cart before the horse is neither beautiful nor practical. Before we can decorate our homes with beautiful things, we need to strip our walls and our lives and establish a foundation of beautiful housekeeping and living; and a taste for beauty is best developed outdoors, where there’s no house and no housekeeper.

Old Johnson, in his “Wonder-Working Providence,” speaking of the first settlers of this town, with whom he was contemporary, tells us that “they burrow themselves in the earth for their first shelter under some hillside, and, casting the soil aloft upon timber, they make a smoky fire against the earth, at the highest side.” They did not “provide them houses,” says he, “till the earth, by the Lord’s blessing, brought forth bread to feed them,” and the first year’s crop was so light that “they were forced to cut their bread very thin for a long season.” The secretary of the Province of New Netherland, writing in Dutch, in 1650, for the information of those who wished to take up land there, states more particularly that “those in New Netherland, and especially in New England, who have no means to build farmhouses at first according to their wishes, dig a square pit in the ground, cellar fashion, six or seven feet deep, as long and as broad as they think proper, case the earth inside with wood all round the wall, and line the wood with the bark of trees or something else to prevent the caving in of the earth; floor this cellar with plank, and wainscot it overhead for a ceiling, raise a roof of spars clear up, and cover the spars with bark or green sods, so that they can live dry and warm in these houses with their entire families for two, three, and four years, it being understood that partitions are run through those cellars which are adapted to the size of the family. The wealthy and principal men in New England, in the beginning of the colonies, commenced their first dwelling houses in this fashion for two reasons; firstly, in order not to waste time in building, and not to want food the next season; secondly, in order not to discourage poor laboring people whom they brought over in numbers from Fatherland. In the course of three or four years, when the country became adapted to agriculture, they built themselves handsome houses, spending on them several thousands.”

Old Johnson, in his “Wonder-Working Providence,” discussing the first settlers of this town, with whom he lived during the same time, states that “they dug into the earth for their first shelter under a hillside, and, pushing the soil up onto timber, they made a smoky fire against the earth, on the highest side.” He mentions that they did not “build them houses” until the land, by God’s blessing, produced bread to sustain them,” and the first year’s harvest was so small that “they had to slice their bread very thin for a long time.” The secretary of the Province of New Netherland, writing in Dutch in 1650 for those interested in acquiring land there, elaborates that “those in New Netherland, and especially in New England, who initially lack the resources to build farmhouses as they want, dig a square pit in the ground, cellar-style, six or seven feet deep, as long and as wide as they deem necessary, line the inside with wood all around the walls, and cover the wood with tree bark or other materials to prevent the earth from collapsing; they floor this cellar with planks and panel the ceiling, raise a roof using spars that extend upward, and cover the spars with bark or green sods, allowing them to live dry and warm in these shelters with their entire families for two, three, or four years, understanding that partitions are built in these cellars based on the size of the family. The wealthy and prominent individuals in New England, at the start of the colonies, constructed their first houses in this manner for two reasons; first, to avoid wasting time on building and lacking food the next season; second, to not discourage the poor laborers they brought over in large numbers from the homeland. After three or four years, when the land became suitable for farming, they built themselves beautiful houses, spending several thousand on them.”

In this course which our ancestors took there was a show of prudence at least, as if their principle were to satisfy the more pressing wants first. But are the more pressing wants satisfied now? When I think of acquiring for myself one of our luxurious dwellings, I am deterred, for, so to speak, the country is not yet adapted to human culture, and we are still forced to cut our spiritual bread far thinner than our forefathers did their wheaten. Not that all architectural ornament is to be neglected even in the rudest periods; but let our houses first be lined with beauty, where they come in contact with our lives, like the tenement of the shellfish, and not overlaid with it. But, alas! I have been inside one or two of them, and know what they are lined with.

In this course that our ancestors took, there was at least some common sense, as if their goal was to meet the most urgent needs first. But are those urgent needs being met today? When I think about getting one of our fancy homes, I hesitate because, quite frankly, the country isn't yet suited for human culture, and we still have to scrape by with our spiritual resources much thinner than our ancestors did with their bread. It's not that we should ignore all architectural beauty, even in the most basic times; but let our homes be adorned with beauty where it truly matters in our lives, like the shell of a shellfish, rather than being covered in it. Unfortunately, I've been inside a couple of them and know what they're actually filled with.

Though we are not so degenerate but that we might possibly live in a cave or a wigwam or wear skins today, it certainly is better to accept the advantages, though so dearly bought, which the invention and industry of mankind offer. In such a neighborhood as this, boards and shingles, lime and bricks, are cheaper and more easily obtained than suitable caves, or whole logs, or bark in sufficient quantities, or even well-tempered clay or flat stones. I speak understandingly on this subject, for I have made myself acquainted with it both theoretically and practically. With a little more wit we might use these materials so as to become richer than the richest now are, and make our civilization a blessing. The civilized man is a more experienced and wiser savage. But to make haste to my own experiment.

Though we aren't so primitive that we couldn't live in a cave or a wigwam or wear animal skins today, it's definitely better to embrace the benefits, however costly, that human invention and hard work provide. In a place like this, wood, shingles, lime, and bricks are cheaper and easier to get than finding suitable caves, whole logs, or enough bark, or even well-made clay or flat stones. I speak from experience on this topic because I've studied it both theoretically and practically. With a bit more cleverness, we could use these materials to become wealthier than the wealthiest today and make our civilization a blessing. A civilized person is just a more skilled and wiser savage. But let me get back to my own experiment.

Near the end of March, 1845, I borrowed an axe and went down to the woods by Walden Pond, nearest to where I intended to build my house, and began to cut down some tall, arrowy white pines, still in their youth, for timber. It is difficult to begin without borrowing, but perhaps it is the most generous course thus to permit your fellow-men to have an interest in your enterprise. The owner of the axe, as he released his hold on it, said that it was the apple of his eye; but I returned it sharper than I received it. It was a pleasant hillside where I worked, covered with pine woods, through which I looked out on the pond, and a small open field in the woods where pines and hickories were springing up. The ice in the pond was not yet dissolved, though there were some open spaces, and it was all dark colored and saturated with water. There were some slight flurries of snow during the days that I worked there; but for the most part when I came out on to the railroad, on my way home, its yellow sand heap stretched away gleaming in the hazy atmosphere, and the rails shone in the spring sun, and I heard the lark and pewee and other birds already come to commence another year with us. They were pleasant spring days, in which the winter of man’s discontent was thawing as well as the earth, and the life that had lain torpid began to stretch itself. One day, when my axe had come off and I had cut a green hickory for a wedge, driving it with a stone, and had placed the whole to soak in a pond hole in order to swell the wood, I saw a striped snake run into the water, and he lay on the bottom, apparently without inconvenience, as long as I stayed there, or more than a quarter of an hour; perhaps because he had not yet fairly come out of the torpid state. It appeared to me that for a like reason men remain in their present low and primitive condition; but if they should feel the influence of the spring of springs arousing them, they would of necessity rise to a higher and more ethereal life. I had previously seen the snakes in frosty mornings in my path with portions of their bodies still numb and inflexible, waiting for the sun to thaw them. On the 1st of April it rained and melted the ice, and in the early part of the day, which was very foggy, I heard a stray goose groping about over the pond and cackling as if lost, or like the spirit of the fog.

Near the end of March 1845, I borrowed an axe and headed to the woods by Walden Pond, the spot closest to where I planned to build my house, and started cutting down some tall, slender young white pines for timber. It’s tough to start without borrowing, but maybe it’s the most generous way to allow others to share in your project. The owner of the axe said it was the apple of his eye as he handed it over, but I returned it in better condition than I got it. I worked on a nice hillside, covered with pine trees, and I could see the pond and a small clearing in the woods where pines and hickories were starting to grow. The ice on the pond hadn’t completely melted yet, though some areas were open, and it looked dark and waterlogged. There were a few light snow flurries on the days I worked there; but mostly, when I walked out to the railroad on my way home, I saw its yellow sand pile gleaming in the hazy air, the rails shining in the spring sun, and I heard the lark, pewee, and other birds returning to kick off a new year with us. These were lovely spring days, as the winter of man’s discontent thawed along with the earth, and life that had been dormant began to stretch itself out. One day, after my axe got stuck and I cut a green hickory for a wedge, tapping it in with a stone and placing it to soak in a pond hole to swell the wood, I spotted a striped snake swimming into the water, resting on the bottom without any trouble as long as I was there, or for around fifteen minutes; maybe because it hadn’t completely come out of its sluggish state. It struck me that, for a similar reason, people remain in their current low and primitive state; but if they felt the awakening energy of spring, they would naturally rise to a higher, more elevated existence. I had seen snakes on frosty mornings, lying in my path with parts of their bodies still numb and stiff, waiting for the sun to warm them up. On April 1st, it rained and melted the ice, and during the early part of the day, which was very foggy, I heard a lone goose wandering around over the pond, honking as if it were lost, like the spirit of the fog.

So I went on for some days cutting and hewing timber, and also studs and rafters, all with my narrow axe, not having many communicable or scholar-like thoughts, singing to myself,—

So I spent several days chopping and shaping wood, including posts and beams, all with my small axe, not having many thoughts to share or scholarly ideas, just singing to myself,—

Men say they know many things;
But lo! they have taken wings,—
The arts and sciences,
And a thousand appliances;
The wind that blows
Is all that any body knows.

Men claim to know a lot;
But guess what? They’re just full of hot air,—
The arts and sciences,
And countless tools;
The wind that blows
Is all that anyone truly knows.

I hewed the main timbers six inches square, most of the studs on two sides only, and the rafters and floor timbers on one side, leaving the rest of the bark on, so that they were just as straight and much stronger than sawed ones. Each stick was carefully mortised or tenoned by its stump, for I had borrowed other tools by this time. My days in the woods were not very long ones; yet I usually carried my dinner of bread and butter, and read the newspaper in which it was wrapped, at noon, sitting amid the green pine boughs which I had cut off, and to my bread was imparted some of their fragrance, for my hands were covered with a thick coat of pitch. Before I had done I was more the friend than the foe of the pine tree, though I had cut down some of them, having become better acquainted with it. Sometimes a rambler in the wood was attracted by the sound of my axe, and we chatted pleasantly over the chips which I had made.

I shaped the main beams to be six inches square, mostly the studs on two sides only, and the rafters and floor beams on one side, leaving the rest of the bark on, so they were just as straight and much stronger than cut ones. Each piece was carefully mortised or tenoned at its base since I had borrowed more tools by that time. My days in the woods weren’t very long, but I usually brought my lunch of bread and butter, reading the newspaper it was wrapped in at noon, sitting among the green pine branches I had cut off, and my bread picked up some of their fragrance because my hands were covered in a thick layer of pitch. By the time I was done, I felt more like a friend than an enemy to the pine tree, even though I had cut down some of them, having gotten to know it better. Sometimes someone wandering through the woods would be drawn by the sound of my axe, and we’d have a nice chat over the wood chips I had made.

By the middle of April, for I made no haste in my work, but rather made the most of it, my house was framed and ready for the raising. I had already bought the shanty of James Collins, an Irishman who worked on the Fitchburg Railroad, for boards. James Collins’ shanty was considered an uncommonly fine one. When I called to see it he was not at home. I walked about the outside, at first unobserved from within, the window was so deep and high. It was of small dimensions, with a peaked cottage roof, and not much else to be seen, the dirt being raised five feet all around as if it were a compost heap. The roof was the soundest part, though a good deal warped and made brittle by the sun. Door-sill there was none, but a perennial passage for the hens under the door board. Mrs. C. came to the door and asked me to view it from the inside. The hens were driven in by my approach. It was dark, and had a dirt floor for the most part, dank, clammy, and aguish, only here a board and there a board which would not bear removal. She lighted a lamp to show me the inside of the roof and the walls, and also that the board floor extended under the bed, warning me not to step into the cellar, a sort of dust hole two feet deep. In her own words, they were “good boards overhead, good boards all around, and a good window,”—of two whole squares originally, only the cat had passed out that way lately. There was a stove, a bed, and a place to sit, an infant in the house where it was born, a silk parasol, gilt-framed looking-glass, and a patent new coffee mill nailed to an oak sapling, all told. The bargain was soon concluded, for James had in the meanwhile returned. I to pay four dollars and twenty-five cents to-night, he to vacate at five to-morrow morning, selling to nobody else meanwhile: I to take possession at six. It were well, he said, to be there early, and anticipate certain indistinct but wholly unjust claims on the score of ground rent and fuel. This he assured me was the only encumbrance. At six I passed him and his family on the road. One large bundle held their all,—bed, coffee-mill, looking-glass, hens,—all but the cat, she took to the woods and became a wild cat, and, as I learned afterward, trod in a trap set for woodchucks, and so became a dead cat at last.

By mid-April, since I wasn’t rushing my work and was taking my time with it, my house was framed and ready to be raised. I had already purchased the small cabin from James Collins, an Irishman who worked on the Fitchburg Railroad, for the wood. James Collins’ cabin was considered quite nice. When I came to check it out, he wasn’t home. I walked around the outside, initially unnoticed from within since the window was so deep and high. It was small, with a peaked cottage roof, and not much else was visible as the dirt was raised five feet all around like a compost heap. The roof was in decent shape, though quite warped and brittle from the sun. There was no door-sill, just a constant passage for the hens under the door board. Mrs. C. came to the door and invited me to look inside. The hens were startled and ran in when I approached. Inside, it was dark and mostly had a dirt floor, damp and clammy, with only a few boards that wouldn’t come out. She lit a lamp to show me the roof and walls, and pointed out that the board floor extended under the bed, warning me not to step into the cellar, a sort of two-foot-deep dust hole. In her words, there were “good boards overhead, good boards all around, and a good window,”—though originally there had been two whole panes, but the cat had recently pushed through one. There was a stove, a bed, a place to sit, a baby that had been born there, a silk parasol, a gilt-framed mirror, and a brand-new coffee mill attached to an oak sapling, that was everything. The deal was quickly settled since James had returned in the meantime. I agreed to pay four dollars and twenty-five cents that night, and he would move out by five the next morning, not selling to anyone else in the meantime: I would take possession at six. He said it would be wise to arrive early to avoid any vague but completely unfair claims concerning ground rent and fuel. He assured me that was the only issue. At six, I passed James and his family on the road. A large bundle contained all their belongings—bed, coffee mill, mirror, hens—except for the cat, who ran off into the woods and became wild. I later found out she got caught in a trap set for woodchucks and ended up dead.

I took down this dwelling the same morning, drawing the nails, and removed it to the pond side by small cartloads, spreading the boards on the grass there to bleach and warp back again in the sun. One early thrush gave me a note or two as I drove along the woodland path. I was informed treacherously by a young Patrick that neighbor Seeley, an Irishman, in the intervals of the carting, transferred the still tolerable, straight, and drivable nails, staples, and spikes to his pocket, and then stood when I came back to pass the time of day, and look freshly up, unconcerned, with spring thoughts, at the devastation; there being a dearth of work, as he said. He was there to represent spectatordom, and help make this seemingly insignificant event one with the removal of the gods of Troy.

I took down the structure that same morning, pulled out the nails, and moved it to the pond side in small cartloads, laying the boards on the grass to bleach and warp back in the sun. One early thrush sang a note or two as I drove along the wooded path. A young guy named Patrick sneakily told me that neighbor Seeley, an Irishman, in between cartloads, pocketed the still decent, straight, and usable nails, staples, and spikes. Then he stood by when I returned to make small talk, looking up casually, with a fresh spring vibe, at the mess; he claimed there was a lack of work. He was there to play the bystander and help turn this seemingly minor event into something as significant as the fall of Troy.

I dug my cellar in the side of a hill sloping to the south, where a woodchuck had formerly dug his burrow, down through sumach and blackberry roots, and the lowest stain of vegetation, six feet square by seven deep, to a fine sand where potatoes would not freeze in any winter. The sides were left shelving, and not stoned; but the sun having never shone on them, the sand still keeps its place. It was but two hours’ work. I took particular pleasure in this breaking of ground, for in almost all latitudes men dig into the earth for an equable temperature. Under the most splendid house in the city is still to be found the cellar where they store their roots as of old, and long after the superstructure has disappeared posterity remark its dent in the earth. The house is still but a sort of porch at the entrance of a burrow.

I dug my cellar into the side of a south-facing hill, where a woodchuck had once made its burrow, cutting through sumac and blackberry roots, and the lowest layer of plants, six feet square and seven feet deep, down to a fine sand where potatoes wouldn’t freeze in winter. The sides were left sloped and not stoned; but since the sun has never shone on them, the sand stays in place. It only took two hours of work. I found a lot of joy in breaking ground, because in almost every part of the world, people dig into the earth for stable temperatures. Under the grandest houses in the city, you can still find the cellar where they store their roots, just like in the past, and long after the house has disappeared, future generations will notice its imprint in the ground. The house is still basically just a porch at the entrance of a burrow.

At length, in the beginning of May, with the help of some of my acquaintances, rather to improve so good an occasion for neighborliness than from any necessity, I set up the frame of my house. No man was ever more honored in the character of his raisers than I. They are destined, I trust, to assist at the raising of loftier structures one day. I began to occupy my house on the 4th of July, as soon as it was boarded and roofed, for the boards were carefully feather-edged and lapped, so that it was perfectly impervious to rain; but before boarding I laid the foundation of a chimney at one end, bringing two cartloads of stones up the hill from the pond in my arms. I built the chimney after my hoeing in the fall, before a fire became necessary for warmth, doing my cooking in the mean while out of doors on the ground, early in the morning: which mode I still think is in some respects more convenient and agreeable than the usual one. When it stormed before my bread was baked, I fixed a few boards over the fire, and sat under them to watch my loaf, and passed some pleasant hours in that way. In those days, when my hands were much employed, I read but little, but the least scraps of paper which lay on the ground, my holder, or tablecloth, afforded me as much entertainment, in fact answered the same purpose as the Iliad.

At the beginning of May, with some help from friends, I decided to take advantage of a great opportunity for building community rather than out of necessity, and I started setting up the framework for my house. No one has ever been more honored by those helping with the construction than I was. I hope they’ll eventually help raise even bigger buildings someday. I moved into my house on July 4th, as soon as it was boarded and roofed. The boards were carefully cut and fitted together, making it totally waterproof; however, before the boarding, I laid the foundation for a chimney at one end, carrying two cartloads of stones up the hill from the pond myself. I built the chimney after I finished hoeing in the fall, before I needed a fire for warmth. In the meantime, I cooked outdoors on the ground early in the morning, a method I still think is sometimes more convenient and enjoyable than the traditional way. When it rained before my bread was baked, I set up a few boards over the fire and sat under them to keep an eye on my loaf, spending some nice hours that way. During those days, when my hands were busy, I didn’t read much, but even the smallest scraps of paper I found on the ground, my makeshift holder, or tablecloth entertained me just as much as the Iliad.

It would be worth the while to build still more deliberately than I did, considering, for instance, what foundation a door, a window, a cellar, a garret, have in the nature of man, and perchance never raising any superstructure until we found a better reason for it than our temporal necessities even. There is some of the same fitness in a man’s building his own house that there is in a bird’s building its own nest. Who knows but if men constructed their dwellings with their own hands, and provided food for themselves and families simply and honestly enough, the poetic faculty would be universally developed, as birds universally sing when they are so engaged? But alas! we do like cowbirds and cuckoos, which lay their eggs in nests which other birds have built, and cheer no traveller with their chattering and unmusical notes. Shall we forever resign the pleasure of construction to the carpenter? What does architecture amount to in the experience of the mass of men? I never in all my walks came across a man engaged in so simple and natural an occupation as building his house. We belong to the community. It is not the tailor alone who is the ninth part of a man; it is as much the preacher, and the merchant, and the farmer. Where is this division of labor to end? and what object does it finally serve? No doubt another may also think for me; but it is not therefore desirable that he should do so to the exclusion of my thinking for myself.

It would be worthwhile to build even more thoughtfully than I did, considering, for example, what role a door, a window, a basement, or an attic has in human nature, and perhaps not constructing anything additional until we find a good reason for it beyond just our immediate needs. There’s a certain logic in a person building their own house just like there is in a bird building its nest. Who knows, if people made their own homes and gathered food for themselves and their families simply and honestly, that the creative spirit might develop in everyone, just as birds sing when they’re busy building? But sadly, we act like cowbirds and cuckoos, laying our eggs in nests made by others and not bringing joy to any traveler with our noisy and unmusical chirps. Should we permanently give the joy of building over to carpenters? What does architecture really mean to most people? I’ve never come across someone engaged in such a simple and natural activity as building their own home. We are part of a community. It’s not just the tailor who makes up a man; it’s also the preacher, the merchant, and the farmer. Where is this division of labor supposed to end, and what purpose does it ultimately serve? Sure, someone else might think for me, but that doesn’t mean it’s right for them to do so at the expense of my own thinking for myself.

True, there are architects so called in this country, and I have heard of one at least possessed with the idea of making architectural ornaments have a core of truth, a necessity, and hence a beauty, as if it were a revelation to him. All very well perhaps from his point of view, but only a little better than the common dilettantism. A sentimental reformer in architecture, he began at the cornice, not at the foundation. It was only how to put a core of truth within the ornaments, that every sugar plum in fact might have an almond or caraway seed in it,—though I hold that almonds are most wholesome without the sugar,—and not how the inhabitant, the indweller, might build truly within and without, and let the ornaments take care of themselves. What reasonable man ever supposed that ornaments were something outward and in the skin merely,—that the tortoise got his spotted shell, or the shellfish its mother-o’-pearl tints, by such a contract as the inhabitants of Broadway their Trinity Church? But a man has no more to do with the style of architecture of his house than a tortoise with that of its shell: nor need the soldier be so idle as to try to paint the precise color of his virtue on his standard. The enemy will find it out. He may turn pale when the trial comes. This man seemed to me to lean over the cornice, and timidly whisper his half truth to the rude occupants who really knew it better than he. What of architectural beauty I now see, I know has gradually grown from within outward, out of the necessities and character of the indweller, who is the only builder,—out of some unconscious truthfulness, and nobleness, without ever a thought for the appearance and whatever additional beauty of this kind is destined to be produced will be preceded by a like unconscious beauty of life. The most interesting dwellings in this country, as the painter knows, are the most unpretending, humble log huts and cottages of the poor commonly; it is the life of the inhabitants whose shells they are, and not any peculiarity in their surfaces merely, which makes them picturesque; and equally interesting will be the citizen’s suburban box, when his life shall be as simple and as agreeable to the imagination, and there is as little straining after effect in the style of his dwelling. A great proportion of architectural ornaments are literally hollow, and a September gale would strip them off, like borrowed plumes, without injury to the substantials. They can do without architecture who have no olives nor wines in the cellar. What if an equal ado were made about the ornaments of style in literature, and the architects of our bibles spent as much time about their cornices as the architects of our churches do? So are made the belles-lettres and the beaux-arts and their professors. Much it concerns a man, forsooth, how a few sticks are slanted over him or under him, and what colors are daubed upon his box. It would signify somewhat, if, in any earnest sense, he slanted them and daubed it; but the spirit having departed out of the tenant, it is of a piece with constructing his own coffin,—the architecture of the grave, and “carpenter” is but another name for “coffin-maker.” One man says, in his despair or indifference to life, take up a handful of the earth at your feet, and paint your house that color. Is he thinking of his last and narrow house? Toss up a copper for it as well. What an abundance of leisure he must have! Why do you take up a handful of dirt? Better paint your house your own complexion; let it turn pale or blush for you. An enterprise to improve the style of cottage architecture! When you have got my ornaments ready I will wear them.

Sure, there are architects by that name in this country, and I’ve heard of at least one who was convinced that architectural details should have a core of truth, necessity, and therefore beauty, as if that idea were a revelation to him. That might make sense from his perspective, but it’s only slightly better than the usual amateurism. A sentimental reformer in architecture, he started with the cornice instead of the foundation. He focused on how to add a core of truth to the ornaments, so every candy might have an almond or caraway seed inside it—though I believe almonds are much better without the sugar. He didn’t consider how the inhabitants could build truly both inside and out and let the ornaments take care of themselves. What reasonable person thinks of ornaments as merely surface-level—the way a tortoise gets its spotted shell, or a shellfish its iridescent colors, unlike how the people on Broadway got their Trinity Church? A person has no more control over the architectural style of their house than a tortoise does over the design of its shell; nor should a soldier need to fuss over painting the exact color of their virtue on their banner. The enemy will find out the truth. They might turn pale when the moment of truth arrives. This man seemed to lean over the cornice and quietly share his half-truth with the rough residents who really understood it better than he did. The beauty of architecture I see now has grown gradually from within outwards, based on the needs and character of its inhabitants, who are the only true builders—born from some unconscious truth and nobility, without any concern for appearances. The most interesting homes in this country, as any painter knows, tend to be the simple, humble log cabins and cottages of the poor; it’s the lives of the people living in them, and not just their surface features, that make them picturesque. A suburban home will also be equally interesting when its life is just as simple and appealing to the imagination, without any forced style. A large portion of architectural details are literally empty, and a strong wind in September could blow them off like borrowed feathers, without harming the essentials. Those without olives or wines in their cellar can do without architecture. What if there were the same fuss over the style of literary details, and the creators of our books spent as much time on their covers as the architects of our churches do on their designs? That’s how belles-lettres and beaux-arts, and their teachers, are formed. It really matters to a person, apparently, how a few sticks are tilted above them or beneath them, and what colors are slapped on their box. It would matter a little if *they* were the ones tilting them and slapping on the paint; but when the spirit has left the tenant, it’s akin to designing their own coffin—grave architecture, where “carpenter” just means “coffin-maker.” One man, in his despair or apathy towards life, says to grab a handful of dirt from the ground and paint your house that color. Is he thinking about his own final resting place? You might as well flip a coin for it. What great boredom he must have! Why pick up a handful of soil? You’d be better off painting your house your own skin tone; let it fade or blush for you. An effort to improve cottage architecture! When you have my decorations ready, I’ll wear them.

Before winter I built a chimney, and shingled the sides of my house, which were already impervious to rain, with imperfect and sappy shingles made of the first slice of the log, whose edges I was obliged to straighten with a plane.

Before winter, I built a chimney and covered the sides of my house, which were already waterproof, with flawed and sticky shingles made from the first cut of the log, whose edges I had to smooth out with a planer.

I have thus a tight shingled and plastered house, ten feet wide by fifteen long, and eight-feet posts, with a garret and a closet, a large window on each side, two trap doors, one door at the end, and a brick fireplace opposite. The exact cost of my house, paying the usual price for such materials as I used, but not counting the work, all of which was done by myself, was as follows; and I give the details because very few are able to tell exactly what their houses cost, and fewer still, if any, the separate cost of the various materials which compose them:—

I have a sturdy shingled and plastered house, ten feet wide and fifteen feet long, with eight-foot posts, a loft, and a closet, a large window on each side, two trap doors, one door at the end, and a brick fireplace across from it. The total cost of my house, using the usual prices for the materials I used but not including the labor since I did it all myself, was as follows; and I provide the details because very few people can accurately say what their houses cost, and even fewer, if any, can break down the individual costs of the different materials that make them up:—

    Boards.......................... $ 8.03½, mostly shanty boards.
    Refuse shingles for roof sides,..  4.00
    Laths,...........................  1.25
    Two second-hand windows
       with glass,...................  2.43
    One thousand old brick,..........  4.00
    Two casks of lime,...............  2.40  That was high.
    Hair,............................  0.31  More than I needed.
    Mantle-tree iron,................  0.15
    Nails,...........................  3.90
    Hinges and screws,...............  0.14
    Latch,...........................  0.10
    Chalk,...........................  0.01
    Transportation,..................  1.40  I carried a good part
                                       ————  on my back.
        In all,..................... $28.12½
    Boards.......................... $ 8.03½, mostly shabby boards.
    Refuse shingles for roof sides,..  4.00
    Laths,...........................  1.25
    Two second-hand windows
       with glass,...................  2.43
    One thousand old bricks,..........  4.00
    Two casks of lime,...............  2.40  That was expensive.
    Hair,............................  0.31  More than I needed.
    Mantle-tree iron,................  0.15
    Nails,...........................  3.90
    Hinges and screws,...............  0.14
    Latch,...........................  0.10
    Chalk,...........................  0.01
    Transportation,..................  1.40  I carried a good part
                                       ————  on my back.
        In total,..................... $28.12½

These are all the materials excepting the timber stones and sand, which I claimed by squatter’s right. I have also a small wood-shed adjoining, made chiefly of the stuff which was left after building the house.

These are all the materials except for the lumber, stones, and sand, which I claimed under squatter’s rights. I also have a small wood shed next to it, built mainly from the leftover materials from when I built the house.

I intend to build me a house which will surpass any on the main street in Concord in grandeur and luxury, as soon as it pleases me as much and will cost me no more than my present one.

I plan to build a house that will outshine any on the main street in Concord in terms of grandeur and luxury, as long as it makes me as happy and costs me no more than my current one.

I thus found that the student who wishes for a shelter can obtain one for a lifetime at an expense not greater than the rent which he now pays annually. If I seem to boast more than is becoming, my excuse is that I brag for humanity rather than for myself; and my shortcomings and inconsistencies do not affect the truth of my statement. Notwithstanding much cant and hypocrisy,—chaff which I find it difficult to separate from my wheat, but for which I am as sorry as any man,—I will breathe freely and stretch myself in this respect, it is such a relief to both the moral and physical system; and I am resolved that I will not through humility become the devil’s attorney. I will endeavor to speak a good word for the truth. At Cambridge College the mere rent of a student’s room, which is only a little larger than my own, is thirty dollars each year, though the corporation had the advantage of building thirty-two side by side and under one roof, and the occupant suffers the inconvenience of many and noisy neighbors, and perhaps a residence in the fourth story. I cannot but think that if we had more true wisdom in these respects, not only less education would be needed, because, forsooth, more would already have been acquired, but the pecuniary expense of getting an education would in a great measure vanish. Those conveniences which the student requires at Cambridge or elsewhere cost him or somebody else ten times as great a sacrifice of life as they would with proper management on both sides. Those things for which the most money is demanded are never the things which the student most wants. Tuition, for instance, is an important item in the term bill, while for the far more valuable education which he gets by associating with the most cultivated of his contemporaries no charge is made. The mode of founding a college is, commonly, to get up a subscription of dollars and cents, and then following blindly the principles of a division of labor to its extreme, a principle which should never be followed but with circumspection,—to call in a contractor who makes this a subject of speculation, and he employs Irishmen or other operatives actually to lay the foundations, while the students that are to be are said to be fitting themselves for it; and for these oversights successive generations have to pay. I think that it would be better than this, for the students, or those who desire to be benefited by it, even to lay the foundation themselves. The student who secures his coveted leisure and retirement by systematically shirking any labor necessary to man obtains but an ignoble and unprofitable leisure, defrauding himself of the experience which alone can make leisure fruitful. “But,” says one, “you do not mean that the students should go to work with their hands instead of their heads?” I do not mean that exactly, but I mean something which he might think a good deal like that; I mean that they should not play life, or study it merely, while the community supports them at this expensive game, but earnestly live it from beginning to end. How could youths better learn to live than by at once trying the experiment of living? Methinks this would exercise their minds as much as mathematics. If I wished a boy to know something about the arts and sciences, for instance, I would not pursue the common course, which is merely to send him into the neighborhood of some professor, where any thing is professed and practised but the art of life;—to survey the world through a telescope or a microscope, and never with his natural eye; to study chemistry, and not learn how his bread is made, or mechanics, and not learn how it is earned; to discover new satellites to Neptune, and not detect the motes in his eyes, or to what vagabond he is a satellite himself; or to be devoured by the monsters that swarm all around him, while contemplating the monsters in a drop of vinegar. Which would have advanced the most at the end of a month,—the boy who had made his own jackknife from the ore which he had dug and smelted, reading as much as would be necessary for this,—or the boy who had attended the lectures on metallurgy at the Institute in the mean while, and had received a Rodgers’ penknife from his father? Which would be most likely to cut his fingers?... To my astonishment I was informed on leaving college that I had studied navigation!—why, if I had taken one turn down the harbor I should have known more about it. Even the poor student studies and is taught only political economy, while that economy of living which is synonymous with philosophy is not even sincerely professed in our colleges. The consequence is, that while he is reading Adam Smith, Ricardo, and Say, he runs his father in debt irretrievably.

I found that a student who wants a place to live can secure one for a lifetime at a cost no greater than the rent he currently pays each year. If I seem to boast too much, it's because I'm speaking for humanity rather than myself; my flaws and inconsistencies don't change the truth of my statement. Despite all the nonsense and hypocrisy—which I struggle to separate from what's valuable, and which bothers me just as much as anyone else—I’ll take a deep breath and allow myself some relief, both morally and physically; I refuse to let humility make me the devil’s advocate. I’ll speak positively about the truth. At Cambridge College, the rent for a student’s room, which is only slightly larger than my own, is thirty dollars each year, even though the college benefits from building thirty-two rooms side by side under one roof. The students have to deal with noisy neighbors and possibly live on the fourth floor. I can’t help but think that if we had more common sense in these areas, we would need less education, because, honestly, more would have already been gained, and the costs of getting an education would mostly disappear. The conveniences a student needs at Cambridge or elsewhere cost him or someone else ten times more in sacrifices than they would with proper management on both sides. The things that cost the most money are rarely what the student actually wants. Tuition, for example, is a major expense on the term bill, while the far more valuable education he receives from interacting with the most cultured peers costs nothing. Typically, when establishing a college, a fund is raised, and then, following the extreme principles of division of labor—which should be approached cautiously—a contractor is brought in to speculate, hiring laborers to lay the foundations, while the future students are said to be preparing for it; and for these oversights, future generations have to pay. I think it would be better if the students, or those who hope to benefit from it, laid the foundations themselves. A student who secures desired leisure and solitude by avoiding necessary work ends up with a worthless kind of leisure, robbing himself of the experiences that could make it valuable. “But,” someone says, “you don’t mean that students should work with their hands instead of their heads?” I don’t mean that exactly, but I do mean something somewhat like that; I mean that they shouldn't just play at life or study it superficially while the community supports them in this costly endeavor, but truly live it from start to finish. How could young people learn to live better than by actually trying out living? I believe this would engage their minds as much as math. If I wanted a boy to learn about the arts and sciences, for example, I wouldn’t go the usual route of sending him to a professor’s vicinity, where anything is taught except the art of living; where he looks at the world through a telescope or a microscope but never with his own eyes; studies chemistry but doesn’t learn how his bread is made, or mechanics without understanding how it’s earned; discovers new moons around Neptune but misses the flecks in his own eyes, or the fact that he’s attached to some wanderer; or is consumed by the monsters swarming around him while fixating on the monsters in a drop of vinegar. Who would have advanced more by the end of the month—the boy who made his own jackknife from the ore he dug and processed while reading just enough to do it, or the boy who attended metallurgy lectures at the Institute while receiving a Rodgers’ penknife from his dad? Who would be more likely to cut his fingers? To my surprise, I was told upon leaving college that I had studied navigation!—if I had just taken a trip down the harbor, I would have learned more. Even the poor student studies and is taught only political economy, while the real economy of living, which is synonymous with philosophy, isn’t even genuinely addressed in our colleges. As a result, while he reads Adam Smith, Ricardo, and Say, he drives his father further into debt.

As with our colleges, so with a hundred “modern improvements”; there is an illusion about them; there is not always a positive advance. The devil goes on exacting compound interest to the last for his early share and numerous succeeding investments in them. Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end, an end which it was already but too easy to arrive at; as railroads lead to Boston or New York. We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate. Either is in such a predicament as the man who was earnest to be introduced to a distinguished deaf woman, but when he was presented, and one end of her ear trumpet was put into his hand, had nothing to say. As if the main object were to talk fast and not to talk sensibly. We are eager to tunnel under the Atlantic and bring the old world some weeks nearer to the new; but perchance the first news that will leak through into the broad, flapping American ear will be that the Princess Adelaide has the whooping cough. After all, the man whose horse trots a mile in a minute does not carry the most important messages; he is not an evangelist, nor does he come round eating locusts and wild honey. I doubt if Flying Childers ever carried a peck of corn to mill.

Just like with our colleges, the same goes for a hundred “modern improvements”; there's an illusion surrounding them; there isn't always real progress. The devil continues to collect compound interest for his early investments and countless subsequent ones. Our inventions often end up being pretty distractions that take our focus away from serious matters. They are just better tools for an unchanged goal, a goal that was already too easy to reach, like how railroads connect to Boston or New York. We're rushing to build a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but maybe Maine and Texas don't have anything important to say to each other. It's like the guy who desperately wanted to meet a famous deaf woman, but when he finally got to, and one end of her ear trumpet was handed to him, he found he had nothing to say. As if the only point was to speak quickly rather than meaningfully. We're excited to tunnel under the Atlantic and bring the old world closer to the new; but perhaps the first news that trickles into the wide, receptive American ear will be that Princess Adelaide has the whooping cough. Ultimately, the guy whose horse trots a mile in a minute doesn’t deliver the most important messages; he’s not a prophet, nor does he show up eating locusts and wild honey. I doubt that Flying Childers ever took a sack of corn to the mill.

One says to me, “I wonder that you do not lay up money; you love to travel; you might take the cars and go to Fitchburg to-day and see the country.” But I am wiser than that. I have learned that the swiftest traveller is he that goes afoot. I say to my friend, Suppose we try who will get there first. The distance is thirty miles; the fare ninety cents. That is almost a day’s wages. I remember when wages were sixty cents a day for laborers on this very road. Well, I start now on foot, and get there before night; I have travelled at that rate by the week together. You will in the mean while have earned your fare, and arrive there some time to-morrow, or possibly this evening, if you are lucky enough to get a job in season. Instead of going to Fitchburg, you will be working here the greater part of the day. And so, if the railroad reached round the world, I think that I should keep ahead of you; and as for seeing the country and getting experience of that kind, I should have to cut your acquaintance altogether.

Someone says to me, “I can’t believe you don’t save money; you love to travel; you could just take a train to Fitchburg today and see the sights.” But I know better. I've figured out that the fastest traveler is the one who goes on foot. I say to my friend, “Let’s see who gets there first.” The distance is thirty miles, and the fare is ninety cents. That’s nearly a whole day’s pay. I remember when wages were sixty cents a day for workers on this very route. Well, I’ll start walking now and arrive before nightfall; I could travel like this for a whole week. Meanwhile, you’ll have earned enough for your fare and probably get there sometime tomorrow, or maybe tonight if you’re lucky enough to find work in time. Instead of going to Fitchburg, you’ll be busy working here for most of the day. So, even if the railroad went all the way around the world, I think I’d still get there ahead of you. And as for seeing the country and getting that kind of experience, I would probably have to cut ties with you completely.

Such is the universal law, which no man can ever outwit, and with regard to the railroad even we may say it is as broad as it is long. To make a railroad round the world available to all mankind is equivalent to grading the whole surface of the planet. Men have an indistinct notion that if they keep up this activity of joint stocks and spades long enough all will at length ride somewhere, in next to no time, and for nothing; but though a crowd rushes to the depot, and the conductor shouts “All aboard!” when the smoke is blown away and the vapor condensed, it will be perceived that a few are riding, but the rest are run over,—and it will be called, and will be, “A melancholy accident.” No doubt they can ride at last who shall have earned their fare, that is, if they survive so long, but they will probably have lost their elasticity and desire to travel by that time. This spending of the best part of one’s life earning money in order to enjoy a questionable liberty during the least valuable part of it, reminds me of the Englishman who went to India to make a fortune first, in order that he might return to England and live the life of a poet. He should have gone up garret at once. “What!” exclaim a million Irishmen starting up from all the shanties in the land, “is not this railroad which we have built a good thing?” Yes, I answer, comparatively good, that is, you might have done worse; but I wish, as you are brothers of mine, that you could have spent your time better than digging in this dirt.

This is the universal law that no one can outsmart, and when it comes to railroads, it’s as straightforward as it gets. Making a railroad that circles the globe accessible to everyone is like leveling the entire surface of the Earth. People have a vague idea that if they keep working at their stocks and shovels long enough, eventually everyone will travel somewhere, almost for free and in no time at all; but when a crowd rushes to the station and the conductor calls out “All aboard!” once the smoke clears and the steam settles, it will be clear that only a few are actually riding while the rest get left behind—and it will be labeled, and will truly be, “a tragic accident.” Undoubtedly, those who eventually get to ride will have earned their fare, that is, if they live long enough, but by then they’ll probably have lost their enthusiasm and desire to travel. Spending the best part of your life earning money to enjoy a questionable freedom during the least valuable part of it reminds me of the Englishman who went to India to get rich first, so he could return to England and live like a poet. He should have gone straight to the attic. “What!” shout millions of Irishmen leaping up from their shanties, “isn’t this railroad we’ve built a good thing?” Yes, I say, comparatively good, meaning you could have done worse; but I wish, because you’re my brothers, that you could have spent your time better than digging in this dirt.

Before I finished my house, wishing to earn ten or twelve dollars by some honest and agreeable method, in order to meet my unusual expenses, I planted about two acres and a half of light and sandy soil near it chiefly with beans, but also a small part with potatoes, corn, peas, and turnips. The whole lot contains eleven acres, mostly growing up to pines and hickories, and was sold the preceding season for eight dollars and eight cents an acre. One farmer said that it was “good for nothing but to raise cheeping squirrels on.” I put no manure whatever on this land, not being the owner, but merely a squatter, and not expecting to cultivate so much again, and I did not quite hoe it all once. I got out several cords of stumps in ploughing, which supplied me with fuel for a long time, and left small circles of virgin mould, easily distinguishable through the summer by the greater luxuriance of the beans there. The dead and for the most part unmerchantable wood behind my house, and the driftwood from the pond, have supplied the remainder of my fuel. I was obliged to hire a team and a man for the ploughing, though I held the plough myself. My farm outgoes for the first season were, for implements, seed, work, &c., $14.72½. The seed corn was given me. This never costs anything to speak of, unless you plant more than enough. I got twelve bushels of beans, and eighteen bushels of potatoes, beside some peas and sweet corn. The yellow corn and turnips were too late to come to any thing. My whole income from the farm was

Before I finished my house, hoping to make ten or twelve dollars through some honest and pleasant method to cover my unusual expenses, I planted about two and a half acres of light, sandy soil nearby mainly with beans, but also a small portion with potatoes, corn, peas, and turnips. The entire property covers eleven acres, mostly overrun with pines and hickories, and was sold the previous season for eight dollars and eight cents per acre. One farmer remarked that it was “good for nothing but raising chirping squirrels.” I didn’t put any manure on this land since I wasn’t the owner but just a squatter, and I didn’t expect to farm that much again; I didn’t quite hoe it all even once. I pulled out several cords of stumps while plowing, which provided me with fuel for quite a while, and left small patches of untouched soil that were easily noticeable in the summer because of the thicker growth of beans there. The dead and mostly unmarketable wood behind my house, along with the driftwood from the pond, provided the rest of my fuel. I had to hire a team and a man for the plowing, although I handled the plow myself. My expenses for the first season for tools, seeds, labor, etc., amounted to $14.72½. The seed corn was given to me. This rarely costs anything unless you plant more than you need. I harvested twelve bushels of beans and eighteen bushels of potatoes, in addition to some peas and sweet corn. The yellow corn and turnips were too late to yield anything. My total income from the farm was

                                       $ 23.44
      Deducting the outgoes,...........  14.72½
                                         —————
      There are left,................. $  8.71½,
                                       $ 23.44  
      After deducting expenses,...........  14.72½  
                                         —————  
      What's left is,................. $  8.71½,  

beside produce consumed and on hand at the time this estimate was made of the value of $4.50,—the amount on hand much more than balancing a little grass which I did not raise. All things considered, that is, considering the importance of a man’s soul and of to-day, notwithstanding the short time occupied by my experiment, nay, partly even because of its transient character, I believe that that was doing better than any farmer in Concord did that year.

besides the produce I had consumed and what was available when this estimate was made of the value of $4.50,—the amount I had was much more than enough to cover a bit of grass that I didn’t grow. All things considered, meaning the importance of a person’s well-being and of today, despite the brief duration of my experiment, and even partly because of its temporary nature, I believe that I was doing better than any farmer in Concord that year.

The next year I did better still, for I spaded up all the land which I required, about a third of an acre, and I learned from the experience of both years, not being in the least awed by many celebrated works on husbandry, Arthur Young among the rest, that if one would live simply and eat only the crop which he raised, and raise no more than he ate, and not exchange it for an insufficient quantity of more luxurious and expensive things, he would need to cultivate only a few rods of ground, and that it would be cheaper to spade up that than to use oxen to plough it, and to select a fresh spot from time to time than to manure the old, and he could do all his necessary farm work as it were with his left hand at odd hours in the summer; and thus he would not be tied to an ox, or horse, or cow, or pig, as at present. I desire to speak impartially on this point, and as one not interested in the success or failure of the present economical and social arrangements. I was more independent than any farmer in Concord, for I was not anchored to a house or farm, but could follow the bent of my genius, which is a very crooked one, every moment. Beside being better off than they already, if my house had been burned or my crops had failed, I should have been nearly as well off as before.

The next year I did even better because I dug up all the land I needed, about a third of an acre. I learned from both years’ experiences, and I wasn’t intimidated at all by famous works on farming, including those by Arthur Young. I realized that if someone wants to live simply and only eat what they grow—growing just enough for their needs, without trading it for an insufficient amount of more luxurious and expensive items—they would only need to cultivate a small amount of land. It would be cheaper to dig it up by hand than to use oxen to plow, and it’s better to change locations occasionally than to manure the same spot. They could handle all the necessary farm work in their spare time during the summer, so they wouldn’t be tied to an ox, horse, cow, or pig like people are now. I want to discuss this fairly, without any bias towards the success or failure of current economic and social systems. I felt more independent than any farmer in Concord because I wasn’t tied down to a house or farm; I could pursue my interests—which are quite unconventional—at any moment. Even if my house burned down or my crops failed, I would still be nearly as well off as I was before.

I am wont to think that men are not so much the keepers of herds as herds are the keepers of men, the former are so much the freer. Men and oxen exchange work; but if we consider necessary work only, the oxen will be seen to have greatly the advantage, their farm is so much the larger. Man does some of his part of the exchange work in his six weeks of haying, and it is no boy’s play. Certainly no nation that lived simply in all respects, that is, no nation of philosophers, would commit so great a blunder as to use the labor of animals. True, there never was and is not likely soon to be a nation of philosophers, nor am I certain it is desirable that there should be. However, I should never have broken a horse or bull and taken him to board for any work he might do for me, for fear I should become a horse-man or a herds-man merely; and if society seems to be the gainer by so doing, are we certain that what is one man’s gain is not another’s loss, and that the stable-boy has equal cause with his master to be satisfied? Granted that some public works would not have been constructed without this aid, and let man share the glory of such with the ox and horse; does it follow that he could not have accomplished works yet more worthy of himself in that case? When men begin to do, not merely unnecessary or artistic, but luxurious and idle work, with their assistance, it is inevitable that a few do all the exchange work with the oxen, or, in other words, become the slaves of the strongest. Man thus not only works for the animal within him, but, for a symbol of this, he works for the animal without him. Though we have many substantial houses of brick or stone, the prosperity of the farmer is still measured by the degree to which the barn overshadows the house. This town is said to have the largest houses for oxen, cows, and horses hereabouts, and it is not behindhand in its public buildings; but there are very few halls for free worship or free speech in this county. It should not be by their architecture, but why not even by their power of abstract thought, that nations should seek to commemorate themselves? How much more admirable the Bhagvat-Geeta than all the ruins of the East! Towers and temples are the luxury of princes. A simple and independent mind does not toil at the bidding of any prince. Genius is not a retainer to any emperor, nor is its material silver, or gold, or marble, except to a trifling extent. To what end, pray, is so much stone hammered? In Arcadia, when I was there, I did not see any hammering stone. Nations are possessed with an insane ambition to perpetuate the memory of themselves by the amount of hammered stone they leave. What if equal pains were taken to smooth and polish their manners? One piece of good sense would be more memorable than a monument as high as the moon. I love better to see stones in place. The grandeur of Thebes was a vulgar grandeur. More sensible is a rod of stone wall that bounds an honest man’s field than a hundred-gated Thebes that has wandered farther from the true end of life. The religion and civilization which are barbaric and heathenish build splendid temples; but what you might call Christianity does not. Most of the stone a nation hammers goes toward its tomb only. It buries itself alive. As for the Pyramids, there is nothing to wonder at in them so much as the fact that so many men could be found degraded enough to spend their lives constructing a tomb for some ambitious booby, whom it would have been wiser and manlier to have drowned in the Nile, and then given his body to the dogs. I might possibly invent some excuse for them and him, but I have no time for it. As for the religion and love of art of the builders, it is much the same all the world over, whether the building be an Egyptian temple or the United States Bank. It costs more than it comes to. The mainspring is vanity, assisted by the love of garlic and bread and butter. Mr. Balcom, a promising young architect, designs it on the back of his Vitruvius, with hard pencil and ruler, and the job is let out to Dobson & Sons, stonecutters. When the thirty centuries begin to look down on it, mankind begin to look up at it. As for your high towers and monuments, there was a crazy fellow once in this town who undertook to dig through to China, and he got so far that, as he said, he heard the Chinese pots and kettles rattle; but I think that I shall not go out of my way to admire the hole which he made. Many are concerned about the monuments of the West and the East,—to know who built them. For my part, I should like to know who in those days did not build them,—who were above such trifling. But to proceed with my statistics.

I often think that men don't really control herds; rather, herds control men, as men are much freer. Men and oxen share the workload, but when we think about necessary work only, it's clear that oxen have a significant advantage because their farms are much larger. Man does his share of the work during the six weeks of haying, which is no easy task. No nation that lives simply, meaning no nation of philosophers, would make the big mistake of using animal labor. True, there's never been a nation of philosophers, and it's unlikely there will be one soon, nor am I sure it would be a good thing if there were. However, I would never break a horse or bull and take it in for work, fearing that I would merely become a horseman or a herdsman; and if society seems to benefit from it, can we be sure that one person's gain isn't another's loss, and that the stable boy has just as much reason to be satisfied as his master? It's true that some public works wouldn’t have been built without this help, and sure, let man share the glory of those with the ox and the horse; but does it mean that he couldn't have achieved works that are even more worthy of him instead? When people start doing not just unnecessary or artistic work, but luxurious and idle work with their help, it's inevitable that only a few will do all the hard work alongside the oxen, or in other words, become slaves to the strongest. Thus, man doesn’t just work for the animal inside him, but he works for the animal outside of him as well. Even though we have many sturdy brick and stone houses, a farmer's success is still measured by how much the barn overshadows the house. This town is said to have the largest stables for oxen, cows, and horses around, and it’s not lacking in public buildings, but there are very few places for free worship or free speech in this county. Nations should not be commemorated by their architecture; why not by their ability to think abstractly instead? How much more admirable is the Bhagavad-Gita than all the ruins of the East! Towers and temples are the luxuries of rulers. A simple and independent mind doesn't work at the command of any prince. Genius isn't a servant to any emperor, nor is its medium silver, gold, or marble, except in a trivial way. What is all this stone being hammered for, anyway? When I was in Arcadia, I didn’t see any stone being hammered. Nations are crazy with ambition to remember themselves by the amount of stone they leave behind. What if they put the same effort into refining and improving their manners? One piece of good sense would be more memorable than a monument as tall as the moon. I prefer to see stones properly placed. The grandeur of Thebes was just a showy grandeur. A simple stone wall that borders an honest man’s field makes more sense than a hundred-gated Thebes, which has strayed further from life’s true purpose. The religions and civilizations that are barbaric and primitive build magnificent temples; but what you might refer to as Christianity does not. Most of the stone a nation hammers only goes towards its own tomb. It buries itself alive. As for the Pyramids, what’s most astounding about them is not the structures themselves but that so many men were so degraded as to spend their lives building a tomb for an ambitious fool, who it would have been wiser and braver to drown in the Nile and feed to the dogs. I might come up with some excuse for them and for him, but I don’t have the time. The admiration for the religion and love of art among the builders is pretty much the same everywhere, whether the structure is an Egyptian temple or the United States Bank. It costs more than it’s worth. The main motivation is vanity, alongside the desire for basic comforts like garlic and bread and butter. Mr. Balcom, a promising young architect, sketches designs on the back of his Vitruvius, using a hard pencil and ruler, and the job goes to Dobson & Sons, the stonemasons. When the thirty centuries start looking down on it, humanity begins to look up at it. As for your tall towers and monuments, there was a guy in this town who once tried to dig through to China, and he got far enough that he claimed he could hear the pots and pans rattling in China; but I don’t think I’ll go out of my way to admire the hole he made. Many are interested in the monuments of the West and East—to find out who built them. Personally, I'd like to know who didn’t build them back then—who was above such trivial matters. But let’s get back to my statistics.

By surveying, carpentry, and day-labor of various other kinds in the village in the mean while, for I have as many trades as fingers, I had earned $13.34. The expense of food for eight months, namely, from July 4th to March 1st, the time when these estimates were made, though I lived there more than two years,—not counting potatoes, a little green corn, and some peas, which I had raised, nor considering the value of what was on hand at the last date, was

By doing surveying, carpentry, and different odd jobs in the village during that time, since I have as many skills as I do fingers, I earned $13.34. The cost of food for eight months, from July 4th to March 1st, when these estimates were made, although I lived there for more than two years—excluding potatoes, some green corn, and a few peas that I had grown, and not factoring in the value of what I had left at the end, was

    Rice,................... $ 1.73½
    Molasses,................  1.73     Cheapest form of the
                                         saccharine.
    Rye meal,................  1.04¾
    Indian meal,.............  0.99¾     Cheaper than rye.
    Pork,....................  0.22

    All experiments which failed:
    Flour,...................  0.88  Costs more than Indian meal,
                                      both money and trouble.
    Sugar,...................  0.80
    Lard,....................  0.65
    Apples,..................  0.25
    Dried apple,.............  0.22
    Sweet potatoes,..........  0.10
    One pumpkin,.............  0.06
    One watermelon,..........  0.02
    Salt,....................  0.03
    Rice,................... $ 1.73½  
    Molasses,................  1.73     The cheapest form of sugar.  
    Rye meal,................  1.04¾  
    Indian meal,.............  0.99¾     Cheaper than rye.  
    Pork,....................  0.22  

    All experiments that failed:  
    Flour,...................  0.88  Costs more than Indian meal,  
                                      both in cash and effort.  
    Sugar,...................  0.80  
    Lard,....................  0.65  
    Apples,..................  0.25  
    Dried apple,.............  0.22  
    Sweet potatoes,..........  0.10  
    One pumpkin,.............  0.06  
    One watermelon,..........  0.02  
    Salt,....................  0.03  

Yes, I did eat $8.74, all told; but I should not thus unblushingly publish my guilt, if I did not know that most of my readers were equally guilty with myself, and that their deeds would look no better in print. The next year I sometimes caught a mess of fish for my dinner, and once I went so far as to slaughter a woodchuck which ravaged my bean-field,—effect his transmigration, as a Tartar would say,—and devour him, partly for experiment’s sake; but though it afforded me a momentary enjoyment, notwithstanding a musky flavor, I saw that the longest use would not make that a good practice, however it might seem to have your woodchucks ready dressed by the village butcher.

Yes, I did eat $8.74 in total; but I wouldn't so brazenly admit my guilt if I didn't know that most of my readers are just as guilty as I am, and their actions wouldn't look any better in print. The next year, I sometimes caught fish for dinner, and once I even went so far as to kill a woodchuck that was destroying my bean field—effecting its transmigration, as a Tartar might say—and ate it, partly just to try it out; but even though it gave me a momentary pleasure, despite a musky flavor, I realized that over time it wouldn't become a good practice, no matter how convenient it seemed to have the village butcher prepare your woodchucks for you.

Clothing and some incidental expenses within the same dates, though little can be inferred from this item, amounted to

Clothing and some related expenses during the same dates, although not much can be concluded from this item, totaled

                                            $8.40¾
    Oil and some household utensils,.......  2.00
                                            $8.40¾
    Oil and some household items,.......  2.00

So that all the pecuniary outgoes, excepting for washing and mending, which for the most part were done out of the house, and their bills have not yet been received,—and these are all and more than all the ways by which money necessarily goes out in this part of the world,—were

So all the money spent, except for laundry and repairs, which mostly happened outside the house and whose bills haven't come in yet,—and these are all the ways money inevitably leaves in this part of the world,—were

    House,................................ $ 28.12½
    Farm one year,.......................... 14.72½
    Food eight months,......................  8.74
    Clothing, etc., eight months,...........  8.40¾
    Oil, &c., eight months,.................  2.00
                                            ——————
        In all,........................... $ 61.99¾
    House,................................ $ 28.12½  
    Farm one year,.......................... 14.72½  
    Food eight months,......................  8.74  
    Clothing, etc., eight months,...........  8.40¾  
    Oil, &c., eight months,.................  2.00  
                                            ——————  
        In all,........................... $ 61.99¾  

I address myself now to those of my readers who have a living to get. And to meet this I have for farm produce sold

I now turn to those of my readers who need to make a living. To achieve this, I have for farm products sold.

                                            $23.44
    Earned by day-labor,...................  13.34
                                            ——————
        In all,............................ $36.78,
                                            $23.44  
    Earned from daily work,...................  13.34  
                                            ——————  
        Total,............................ $36.78,  

which subtracted from the sum of the outgoes leaves a balance of $25.21¾ on the one side,—this being very nearly the means with which I started, and the measure of expenses to be incurred,—and on the other, beside the leisure and independence and health thus secured, a comfortable house for me as long as I choose to occupy it.

which taken away from the total expenses leaves me with a balance of $25.21¾ on one side—this being almost exactly what I started with, and the amount I plan to spend—and on the other side, along with the free time, independence, and health I've gained, a cozy home for however long I want to stay in it.

These statistics, however accidental and therefore uninstructive they may appear, as they have a certain completeness, have a certain value also. Nothing was given me of which I have not rendered some account. It appears from the above estimate, that my food alone cost me in money about twenty-seven cents a week. It was, for nearly two years after this, rye and Indian meal without yeast, potatoes, rice, a very little salt pork, molasses, and salt, and my drink water. It was fit that I should live on rice, mainly, who loved so well the philosophy of India. To meet the objections of some inveterate cavillers, I may as well state, that if I dined out occasionally, as I always had done, and I trust shall have opportunities to do again, it was frequently to the detriment of my domestic arrangements. But the dining out, being, as I have stated, a constant element, does not in the least affect a comparative statement like this.

These statistics, though they may seem random and unhelpful, still hold some value due to their completeness. I accounted for everything I was given. From the information above, my food cost me about twenty-seven cents a week. For nearly two years after this, my diet consisted of rye and cornmeal without yeast, potatoes, rice, a small amount of salt pork, molasses, and salt, and I drank water. It was fitting that I mainly lived on rice, since I loved the philosophy of India so much. To address the criticisms from some stubborn skeptics, I should mention that if I occasionally dined out, as I always had and hope to again, it often disrupted my home routine. However, since dining out was a regular part of my life, it doesn't really change a comparison like this.

I learned from my two years’ experience that it would cost incredibly little trouble to obtain one’s necessary food, even in this latitude; that a man may use as simple a diet as the animals, and yet retain health and strength. I have made a satisfactory dinner, satisfactory on several accounts, simply off a dish of purslane (Portulaca oleracea) which I gathered in my cornfield, boiled and salted. I give the Latin on account of the savoriness of the trivial name. And pray what more can a reasonable man desire, in peaceful times, in ordinary noons, than a sufficient number of ears of green sweet-corn boiled, with the addition of salt? Even the little variety which I used was a yielding to the demands of appetite, and not of health. Yet men have come to such a pass that they frequently starve, not for want of necessaries, but for want of luxuries; and I know a good woman who thinks that her son lost his life because he took to drinking water only.

I learned from my two years of experience that it takes very little effort to get the food you need, even here; that a person can eat as simply as animals and still stay healthy and strong. I’ve had a satisfying dinner—satisfying for several reasons—just from a dish of purslane (Portulaca oleracea) I picked in my cornfield, boiled, and salted. I mention the Latin name because of how unappealing the common name is. And honestly, what more can a reasonable person want during peaceful times, on ordinary afternoons, than a good amount of ears of sweet corn boiled with some salt? Even the little variety I used was just giving in to cravings, not health needs. Yet people have gotten to the point where they often suffer hunger, not from a lack of essentials, but from a lack of luxuries. I know a good woman who believes that her son lost his life because he only drank water.

The reader will perceive that I am treating the subject rather from an economic than a dietetic point of view, and he will not venture to put my abstemiousness to the test unless he has a well-stocked larder.

The reader will notice that I am approaching the topic more from an economic perspective rather than a dietary one, and he won't dare to challenge my self-restraint unless he has a fully stocked pantry.

Bread I at first made of pure Indian meal and salt, genuine hoe-cakes, which I baked before my fire out of doors on a shingle or the end of a stick of timber sawed off in building my house; but it was wont to get smoked and to have a piny flavor. I tried flour also; but have at last found a mixture of rye and Indian meal most convenient and agreeable. In cold weather it was no little amusement to bake several small loaves of this in succession, tending and turning them as carefully as an Egyptian his hatching eggs. They were a real cereal fruit which I ripened, and they had to my senses a fragrance like that of other noble fruits, which I kept in as long as possible by wrapping them in cloths. I made a study of the ancient and indispensable art of bread-making, consulting such authorities as offered, going back to the primitive days and first invention of the unleavened kind, when from the wildness of nuts and meats men first reached the mildness and refinement of this diet, and travelling gradually down in my studies through that accidental souring of the dough which, it is supposed, taught the leavening process, and through the various fermentations thereafter, till I came to “good, sweet, wholesome bread,” the staff of life. Leaven, which some deem the soul of bread, the spiritus which fills its cellular tissue, which is religiously preserved like the vestal fire,—some precious bottle-full, I suppose, first brought over in the Mayflower, did the business for America, and its influence is still rising, swelling, spreading, in cerealian billows over the land,—this seed I regularly and faithfully procured from the village, till at length one morning I forgot the rules, and scalded my yeast; by which accident I discovered that even this was not indispensable,—for my discoveries were not by the synthetic but analytic process,—and I have gladly omitted it since, though most housewives earnestly assured me that safe and wholesome bread without yeast might not be, and elderly people prophesied a speedy decay of the vital forces. Yet I find it not to be an essential ingredient, and after going without it for a year am still in the land of the living; and I am glad to escape the trivialness of carrying a bottle-full in my pocket, which would sometimes pop and discharge its contents to my discomfiture. It is simpler and more respectable to omit it. Man is an animal who more than any other can adapt himself to all climates and circumstances. Neither did I put any sal soda, or other acid or alkali, into my bread. It would seem that I made it according to the recipe which Marcus Porcius Cato gave about two centuries before Christ. “Panem depsticium sic facito. Manus mortariumque bene lavato. Farinam in mortarium indito, aquæ paulatim addito, subigitoque pulchre. Ubi bene subegeris, defingito, coquitoque sub testu.” Which I take to mean—“Make kneaded bread thus. Wash your hands and trough well. Put the meal into the trough, add water gradually, and knead it thoroughly. When you have kneaded it well, mould it, and bake it under a cover,” that is, in a baking-kettle. Not a word about leaven. But I did not always use this staff of life. At one time, owing to the emptiness of my purse, I saw none of it for more than a month.

I initially made my bread from pure cornmeal and salt, actual hoe-cakes, which I baked outside on a shingle or the end of a piece of wood cut from my house construction; but it often turned out smoky and had a piney taste. I also experimented with flour but eventually found a mix of rye and cornmeal to be the most convenient and enjoyable. In cold weather, it was quite entertaining to bake several small loaves one after another, tending to them as carefully as an Egyptian cares for hatching eggs. They were a true cereal fruit that I matured, and they had a scent similar to other great fruits, which I preserved as long as possible by wrapping them in cloths. I dived into the ancient and essential art of bread-making, consulting all available sources, tracing it back to the primitive days and the first creation of unleavened bread, when humans moved from consuming wild nuts and meat to adopting this gentler, refined diet. I gradually learned about the accidental souring of dough that is thought to have led to the leavening process and the various fermentations that followed, until I arrived at “good, sweet, wholesome bread,” the staff of life. Leaven, which some consider the soul of bread—the spirit that fills its airy structure—was preserved like sacred fire; I imagined it was a precious vial first brought over on the Mayflower, influencing America continuously as it rises, swells, and spreads in cereal waves across the land. I regularly and diligently obtained this seed from the village, but one morning I forgot the rules and scalded my yeast. This accident revealed to me that even yeast wasn’t necessary—my discoveries came more from analysis than synthesis—and I have happily skipped it since, even though many housewives insisted that safe and wholesome bread couldn’t be made without it, and older folks predicted a quick decline of health. Nonetheless, I found it wasn’t an essential ingredient, and after a year without it, I’m still alive; I’m also glad not to have the hassle of carrying around a bottle of it in my pocket, which would sometimes pop open and spill everywhere. It feels simpler and more respectable to leave it out. Humans are the most adaptable creatures, able to adjust to all kinds of climates and situations. I also avoided using any baking soda or other acids or bases in my bread. It appears I made it according to the recipe that Marcus Porcius Cato provided about two centuries before Christ: “Make kneaded bread this way. Wash your hands and bowl well. Put the flour in the bowl, gradually add water, and knead it well. When you have kneaded it properly, shape it and bake it covered.” To me, this means “Bake kneaded bread like this. Clean your hands and bowl thoroughly. Add flour to the bowl, then slowly mix in water, and knead it well. When it's well kneaded, shape it and bake it covered,” which is in a baking pot. There's no mention of leaven. However, I didn’t always have this staple. At one point, due to my empty wallet, I went without it for over a month.

Every New Englander might easily raise all his own breadstuffs in this land of rye and Indian corn, and not depend on distant and fluctuating markets for them. Yet so far are we from simplicity and independence that, in Concord, fresh and sweet meal is rarely sold in the shops, and hominy and corn in a still coarser form are hardly used by any. For the most part the farmer gives to his cattle and hogs the grain of his own producing, and buys flour, which is at least no more wholesome, at a greater cost, at the store. I saw that I could easily raise my bushel or two of rye and Indian corn, for the former will grow on the poorest land, and the latter does not require the best, and grind them in a hand-mill, and so do without rice and pork; and if I must have some concentrated sweet, I found by experiment that I could make a very good molasses either of pumpkins or beets, and I knew that I needed only to set out a few maples to obtain it more easily still, and while these were growing I could use various substitutes beside those which I have named. “For,” as the Forefathers sang,—

Every New Englander could easily grow all their own grains in this land of rye and corn, without relying on distant and unpredictable markets. Yet we are far from being simple and self-sufficient, as in Concord, fresh and quality flour is rarely available in stores, and hominy and coarser corn are hardly consumed by anyone. Usually, farmers feed their livestock the grain they produce and purchase flour, which is no healthier and more expensive. I realized that I could readily grow a bushel or two of rye and corn; rye grows well even in poor soil, and corn doesn’t need the best conditions, and I could grind them in a hand mill to avoid rice and pork. If I wanted a concentrated sweetener, I discovered I could easily make good molasses from pumpkins or beets, and I knew I just needed to plant a few maple trees to make it even easier, and while those trees were growing, I could use various other substitutes in addition to those I’ve mentioned. "For," as our Forefathers sang,—

“we can make liquor to sweeten our lips
Of pumpkins and parsnips and walnut-tree chips.”

“we can make booze to sweeten our lips
From pumpkins, parsnips, and walnut wood scraps.”

Finally, as for salt, that grossest of groceries, to obtain this might be a fit occasion for a visit to the seashore, or, if I did without it altogether, I should probably drink the less water. I do not learn that the Indians ever troubled themselves to go after it.

Finally, regarding salt, that most basic of groceries, getting some might be a good reason for a trip to the beach, or if I manage without it entirely, I would likely drink less water. I don't hear that the Native Americans ever bothered to look for it.

Thus I could avoid all trade and barter, so far as my food was concerned, and having a shelter already, it would only remain to get clothing and fuel. The pantaloons which I now wear were woven in a farmer’s family,—thank Heaven there is so much virtue still in man; for I think the fall from the farmer to the operative as great and memorable as that from the man to the farmer;—and in a new country, fuel is an encumbrance. As for a habitat, if I were not permitted still to squat, I might purchase one acre at the same price for which the land I cultivated was sold—namely, eight dollars and eight cents. But as it was, I considered that I enhanced the value of the land by squatting on it.

So I could avoid all trade and bartering when it came to food, and since I already had shelter, I just needed to get clothing and fuel. The pants I’m wearing now were made by a farmer's family—thank goodness there are still good people out there; I believe the shift from farmer to worker is just as significant as the shift from man to farmer. In a new country, fuel can be a burden. As for a home, if I couldn't keep squatting, I could buy one acre for the same price that my cultivated land sold for—eight dollars and eight cents. But as it was, I felt that I was increasing the land's value by squatting on it.

There is a certain class of unbelievers who sometimes ask me such questions as, if I think that I can live on vegetable food alone; and to strike at the root of the matter at once,—for the root is faith,—I am accustomed to answer such, that I can live on board nails. If they cannot understand that, they cannot understand much that I have to say. For my part, I am glad to hear of experiments of this kind being tried; as that a young man tried for a fortnight to live on hard, raw corn on the ear, using his teeth for all mortar. The squirrel tribe tried the same and succeeded. The human race is interested in these experiments, though a few old women who are incapacitated for them, or who own their thirds in mills, may be alarmed.

There’s a certain group of skeptics who sometimes ask me if I really think I can survive on just plant-based food. To get straight to the point—because the foundation is faith—I usually respond that I could survive on board nails. If they can’t grasp that, they probably won’t understand much of what I have to say. Personally, I’m happy to hear about experiments like these; for instance, a young man tried to live solely on hard, raw corn for two weeks, using his teeth as the only tool. The squirrel family tried the same thing and succeeded. Humanity is interested in these experiments, although a few older women who can’t participate, or who have a stake in mills, might be concerned.

My furniture, part of which I made myself, and the rest cost me nothing of which I have not rendered an account, consisted of a bed, a table, a desk, three chairs, a looking-glass three inches in diameter, a pair of tongs and andirons, a kettle, a skillet, and a frying-pan, a dipper, a wash-bowl, two knives and forks, three plates, one cup, one spoon, a jug for oil, a jug for molasses, and a japanned lamp. None is so poor that he need sit on a pumpkin. That is shiftlessness. There is a plenty of such chairs as I like best in the village garrets to be had for taking them away. Furniture! Thank God, I can sit and I can stand without the aid of a furniture warehouse. What man but a philosopher would not be ashamed to see his furniture packed in a cart and going up country exposed to the light of heaven and the eyes of men, a beggarly account of empty boxes? That is Spaulding’s furniture. I could never tell from inspecting such a load whether it belonged to a so called rich man or a poor one; the owner always seemed poverty-stricken. Indeed, the more you have of such things the poorer you are. Each load looks as if it contained the contents of a dozen shanties; and if one shanty is poor, this is a dozen times as poor. Pray, for what do we move ever but to get rid of our furniture, our exuviæ; at last to go from this world to another newly furnished, and leave this to be burned? It is the same as if all these traps were buckled to a man’s belt, and he could not move over the rough country where our lines are cast without dragging them,—dragging his trap. He was a lucky fox that left his tail in the trap. The muskrat will gnaw his third leg off to be free. No wonder man has lost his elasticity. How often he is at a dead set! “Sir, if I may be so bold, what do you mean by a dead set?” If you are a seer, whenever you meet a man you will see all that he owns, ay, and much that he pretends to disown, behind him, even to his kitchen furniture and all the trumpery which he saves and will not burn, and he will appear to be harnessed to it and making what headway he can. I think that the man is at a dead set who has got through a knot hole or gateway where his sledge load of furniture cannot follow him. I cannot but feel compassion when I hear some trig, compact-looking man, seemingly free, all girded and ready, speak of his “furniture,” as whether it is insured or not. “But what shall I do with my furniture?” My gay butterfly is entangled in a spider’s web then. Even those who seem for a long while not to have any, if you inquire more narrowly you will find have some stored in somebody’s barn. I look upon England to-day as an old gentleman who is travelling with a great deal of baggage, trumpery which has accumulated from long housekeeping, which he has not the courage to burn; great trunk, little trunk, bandbox and bundle. Throw away the first three at least. It would surpass the powers of a well man nowadays to take up his bed and walk, and I should certainly advise a sick one to lay down his bed and run. When I have met an immigrant tottering under a bundle which contained his all—looking like an enormous wen which had grown out of the nape of his neck—I have pitied him, not because that was his all, but because he had all that to carry. If I have got to drag my trap, I will take care that it be a light one and do not nip me in a vital part. But perchance it would be wisest never to put one’s paw into it.

My furniture, some of which I made myself and the rest I got for free, includes a bed, a table, a desk, three chairs, a three-inch diameter mirror, a pair of tongs and andirons, a kettle, a skillet, a frying pan, a dipper, a wash bowl, two knives and forks, three plates, one cup, one spoon, a jug for oil, a jug for molasses, and a painted lamp. No one is so poor that they need to sit on a pumpkin. That’s just laziness. There are plenty of chairs I like in the village attics just waiting to be taken. Furniture! Thank God, I can sit and stand without a furniture store to help me. What man, except a philosopher, wouldn’t feel ashamed to see his furniture packed in a cart, going off to the countryside exposed to the light of day and the eyes of others, a pitiful display of empty boxes? That’s Spaulding’s furniture. You could never tell just by looking at such a load whether it belonged to a so-called rich man or a poor one; the owner always looks broke. In fact, the more stuff you have, the poorer you are. Each load looks like it has everything from a dozen shacks, and if one shack is poor, then this is a dozen times poorer. Really, why do we move at all but to get rid of our furniture, our old things; ultimately to go from this world to another that’s newly furnished, leaving this one to be burned? It's like all these possessions are strapped to a man's belt, making it hard for him to move through the rough land where we find ourselves without dragging them along—dragging his burden. He was a lucky fox that left his tail in the trap. The muskrat will chew off his third leg just to be free. No wonder man has lost his flexibility. He often feels stuck! “Sir, if I may be so bold, what do you mean by stuck?” If you observe closely, whenever you meet a man, you can see everything he owns, and even a lot of what he pretends to have gotten rid of, behind him, right down to his kitchen items and all the junk he can’t let go of, and he appears to be tied to it, trying to make progress. I think the man is stuck who manages to get through a knothole or a gate where his heavy load of furniture can’t follow him. I can’t help but feel sorry when I hear some well-dressed, fit-looking man, apparently free, all set and ready, discussing his “furniture,” as whether it’s insured or not. “But what will I do with my furniture?” My cheerful butterfly is then caught in a spider’s web. Even those who seem to have none for a while, if you look a little closer, you’ll find they have some hidden away in someone’s barn. I view England today as an old man traveling with a lot of baggage, unnecessary stuff that's built up from years of living, which he doesn’t have the courage to throw away; great trunk, little trunk, hatbox, and bundle. Get rid of at least the first three. It’s more than a healthy person could manage today to just take up his bed and walk, and I’d definitely tell a sick person to just lay down their bed and run. When I see an immigrant staggering under a bundle that holds all their possessions—looking like a huge growth that’s sprouted out of the back of their neck—I feel pity for them, not because that’s their everything, but because they have to carry all of that. If I have to carry a burden, I’ll make sure it’s a light one that doesn’t pinch me where it matters. But maybe it would be best never to let myself get caught in it at all.

I would observe, by the way, that it costs me nothing for curtains, for I have no gazers to shut out but the sun and moon, and I am willing that they should look in. The moon will not sour milk nor taint meat of mine, nor will the sun injure my furniture or fade my carpet, and if he is sometimes too warm a friend, I find it still better economy to retreat behind some curtain which nature has provided, than to add a single item to the details of housekeeping. A lady once offered me a mat, but as I had no room to spare within the house, nor time to spare within or without to shake it, I declined it, preferring to wipe my feet on the sod before my door. It is best to avoid the beginnings of evil.

I should mention that I don’t spend anything on curtains since the only things I need to block out are the sun and moon, and I don’t mind letting them in. The moon won’t spoil my milk or contaminate my meat, and the sun won’t damage my furniture or fade my carpet. If he sometimes gets a bit too hot, I find it much easier to just step behind a natural barrier instead of adding anything to the chores of keeping house. A lady once offered me a mat, but since I had no space to spare inside and no time to shake it out, I turned it down, choosing instead to wipe my feet on the grass by my door. It’s best to steer clear of the beginnings of trouble.

Not long since I was present at the auction of a deacon’s effects, for his life had not been ineffectual:—

Not long ago, I attended the auction of a deacon's belongings, because his life had not been without purpose:—

“The evil that men do lives after them.”

“The bad things people do stay with them.”

As usual, a great proportion was trumpery which had begun to accumulate in his father’s day. Among the rest was a dried tapeworm. And now, after lying half a century in his garret and other dust holes, these things were not burned; instead of a bonfire, or purifying destruction of them, there was an auction, or increasing of them. The neighbors eagerly collected to view them, bought them all, and carefully transported them to their garrets and dust holes, to lie there till their estates are settled, when they will start again. When a man dies he kicks the dust.

As always, a lot of it was just junk that had started piling up back in his father's time. Among the junk was a dried tapeworm. Now, after lying in his attic and other dusty corners for half a century, instead of being burned in a bonfire or destroyed in some cleansing way, they were put up for an auction, only adding to the collection. The neighbors eagerly gathered to check them out, bought everything, and carefully took it all to their own attics and dusty spots, where it will sit until their estates are settled, and then it will all start over again. When a man dies, he stirs up the dust.

The customs of some savage nations might, perchance, be profitably imitated by us, for they at least go through the semblance of casting their slough annually; they have the idea of the thing, whether they have the reality or not. Would it not be well if we were to celebrate such a “busk,” or “feast of first fruits,” as Bartram describes to have been the custom of the Mucclasse Indians? “When a town celebrates the busk,” says he, “having previously provided themselves with new clothes, new pots, pans, and other household utensils and furniture, they collect all their worn out clothes and other despicable things, sweep and cleanse their houses, squares, and the whole town of their filth, which with all the remaining grain and other old provisions they cast together into one common heap, and consume it with fire. After having taken medicine, and fasted for three days, all the fire in the town is extinguished. During this fast they abstain from the gratification of every appetite and passion whatever. A general amnesty is proclaimed; all malefactors may return to their town.—”

The customs of some primitive nations might actually be worth adopting by us, as they at least go through the act of shedding their old selves every year; they understand the concept, whether they truly achieve it or not. Wouldn’t it be great if we celebrated a “busk” or “feast of first fruits,” like Bartram described for the Mucclasse Indians? “When a town celebrates the busk,” he says, “they first get new clothes, new pots, pans, and other household items and furniture. Then they gather all their worn-out clothes and other undesirable things, clean and tidy up their homes, public spaces, and the entire town of their dirt, which, along with all leftover grain and old provisions, they pile together and burn. After taking medicine and fasting for three days, all the fire in the town is put out. During this fast, they avoid all cravings and passions. A general amnesty is declared; all wrongdoers are allowed to return to their town.”

“On the fourth morning, the high priest, by rubbing dry wood together, produces new fire in the public square, from whence every habitation in the town is supplied with the new and pure flame.”

“On the fourth morning, the high priest starts a new fire in the public square by rubbing dry wood together, from which every home in the town gets this new and pure flame.”

They then feast on the new corn and fruits, and dance and sing for three days, “and the four following days they receive visits and rejoice with their friends from neighboring towns who have in like manner purified and prepared themselves.”

They then enjoy the new corn and fruits, and dance and sing for three days, “and the four following days they receive visits and celebrate with their friends from nearby towns who have similarly purified and prepared themselves.”

The Mexicans also practised a similar purification at the end of every fifty-two years, in the belief that it was time for the world to come to an end.

The Mexicans also performed a similar purification every fifty-two years, believing it was time for the world to end.

I have scarcely heard of a truer sacrament, that is, as the dictionary defines it, “outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace,” than this, and I have no doubt that they were originally inspired directly from Heaven to do thus, though they have no biblical record of the revelation.

I have hardly heard of a truer sacrament, which, as the dictionary defines it, is an “outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace,” than this one, and I’m sure they were originally inspired directly from Heaven to do this, even though there’s no biblical record of the revelation.

For more than five years I maintained myself thus solely by the labor of my hands, and I found, that by working about six weeks in a year, I could meet all the expenses of living. The whole of my winters, as well as most of my summers, I had free and clear for study. I have thoroughly tried school-keeping, and found that my expenses were in proportion, or rather out of proportion, to my income, for I was obliged to dress and train, not to say think and believe, accordingly, and I lost my time into the bargain. As I did not teach for the good of my fellow-men, but simply for a livelihood, this was a failure. I have tried trade; but I found that it would take ten years to get under way in that, and that then I should probably be on my way to the devil. I was actually afraid that I might by that time be doing what is called a good business. When formerly I was looking about to see what I could do for a living, some sad experience in conforming to the wishes of friends being fresh in my mind to tax my ingenuity, I thought often and seriously of picking huckleberries; that surely I could do, and its small profits might suffice,—for my greatest skill has been to want but little,—so little capital it required, so little distraction from my wonted moods, I foolishly thought. While my acquaintances went unhesitatingly into trade or the professions, I contemplated this occupation as most like theirs; ranging the hills all summer to pick the berries which came in my way, and thereafter carelessly dispose of them; so, to keep the flocks of Admetus. I also dreamed that I might gather the wild herbs, or carry evergreens to such villagers as loved to be reminded of the woods, even to the city, by hay-cart loads. But I have since learned that trade curses everything it handles; and though you trade in messages from heaven, the whole curse of trade attaches to the business.

For more than five years, I got by solely through my own hard work, and I discovered that by working about six weeks a year, I could cover all my living expenses. This left me with all winter and most of summer free for studying. I tried teaching and found my expenses were way higher than my income, since I had to dress a certain way, act accordingly, and even think and believe in specific ways, which ended up wasting my time. I wasn’t teaching for the benefit of others, just to make a living, so it didn't work out. I also explored going into business but realized it would take ten years to really get started, and even then, I might end up in a bad place. I was honestly worried that after all that time I might be successful in a way that wasn't good. When I was searching for ways to earn a living, still fresh from some disappointing experiences trying to meet friends' expectations, I often thought seriously about picking huckleberries; it seemed like something I could manage, and the small profits would be enough—since my greatest skill is wanting very little—plus it required little investment and wouldn’t distract me too much from my usual mood. While my friends confidently dove into business or careers, I saw this berry picking as the closest option for me—spending the summer picking berries and then selling them casually, while tending to the flocks of Admetus. I also dreamed of collecting wild herbs or delivering evergreens to villagers who enjoyed reminders of the forest, even hauling them into the city by the truckload. But I eventually learned that trade taints everything it touches; even if you're dealing with messages from heaven, the burden of trade comes along with it.

As I preferred some things to others, and especially valued my freedom, as I could fare hard and yet succeed well, I did not wish to spend my time in earning rich carpets or other fine furniture, or delicate cookery, or a house in the Grecian or the Gothic style just yet. If there are any to whom it is no interruption to acquire these things, and who know how to use them when acquired, I relinquish to them the pursuit. Some are “industrious,” and appear to love labor for its own sake, or perhaps because it keeps them out of worse mischief; to such I have at present nothing to say. Those who would not know what to do with more leisure than they now enjoy, I might advise to work twice as hard as they do,—work till they pay for themselves, and get their free papers. For myself I found that the occupation of a day-laborer was the most independent of any, especially as it required only thirty or forty days in a year to support one. The laborer’s day ends with the going down of the sun, and he is then free to devote himself to his chosen pursuit, independent of his labor; but his employer, who speculates from month to month, has no respite from one end of the year to the other.

As I had preferences and especially valued my freedom, and since I could endure hardship and still do well, I didn't want to spend my time chasing after expensive carpets, fancy furniture, gourmet food, or a house in a Grecian or Gothic style just yet. If there are others who don’t mind acquiring these things and know how to use them once they have them, I’ll leave that pursuit to them. Some people are “hardworking” and seem to enjoy work for its own sake, or maybe because it keeps them out of trouble; for now, I have nothing to say to them. Those who wouldn’t know what to do with more free time than they currently have might be better off working twice as hard as they do—working until they’ve earned their freedom. For me, I found that being a day laborer was the most independent job of all, especially since it only required thirty or forty days of work a year to make a living. A laborer finishes his work when the sun goes down, and he’s then free to focus on what he truly wants to do, independent of his job; meanwhile, his employer, who has to think about finances month after month, has no break from one end of the year to the other.

In short, I am convinced, both by faith and experience, that to maintain one’s self on this earth is not a hardship but a pastime, if we will live simply and wisely; as the pursuits of the simpler nations are still the sports of the more artificial. It is not necessary that a man should earn his living by the sweat of his brow, unless he sweats easier than I do.

In short, I'm convinced, both by faith and experience, that living on this earth isn't a struggle but a hobby, if we live simply and wisely; the activities of simpler nations are still the fun of the more complex ones. A man doesn't have to earn his living by working hard unless he finds that easier than I do.

One young man of my acquaintance, who has inherited some acres, told me that he thought he should live as I did, if he had the means. I would not have any one adopt my mode of living on any account; for, beside that before he has fairly learned it I may have found out another for myself, I desire that there may be as many different persons in the world as possible; but I would have each one be very careful to find out and pursue his own way, and not his father’s or his mother’s or his neighbor’s instead. The youth may build or plant or sail, only let him not be hindered from doing that which he tells me he would like to do. It is by a mathematical point only that we are wise, as the sailor or the fugitive slave keeps the polestar in his eye; but that is sufficient guidance for all our life. We may not arrive at our port within a calculable period, but we would preserve the true course.

One young man I know, who has inherited some land, told me he thought he would live like I do, if he had the means. I wouldn't want anyone to adopt my way of living for any reason; besides, by the time he fully understands it, I might have already discovered a new way for myself. I want there to be as many different people in the world as possible; but I believe each person should be very careful to find and follow his own path, rather than just copying his father’s or mother’s or neighbor’s. Young people might build, plant, or sail, but they should not be stopped from doing what they tell me they want to do. We may only be wise by a small margin, like a sailor or a runaway slave keeping the North Star in sight; but that’s enough guidance for our whole lives. We may not reach our destination within a set timeframe, but we must stay on the right course.

Undoubtedly, in this case, what is true for one is truer still for a thousand, as a large house is not proportionally more expensive than a small one, since one roof may cover, one cellar underlie, and one wall separate several apartments. But for my part, I preferred the solitary dwelling. Moreover, it will commonly be cheaper to build the whole yourself than to convince another of the advantage of the common wall; and when you have done this, the common partition, to be much cheaper, must be a thin one, and that other may prove a bad neighbor, and also not keep his side in repair. The only coöperation which is commonly possible is exceedingly partial and superficial; and what little true coöperation there is, is as if it were not, being a harmony inaudible to men. If a man has faith, he will coöperate with equal faith everywhere; if he has not faith, he will continue to live like the rest of the world, whatever company he is joined to. To coöperate, in the highest as well as the lowest sense, means to get our living together. I heard it proposed lately that two young men should travel together over the world, the one without money, earning his means as he went, before the mast and behind the plow, the other carrying a bill of exchange in his pocket. It was easy to see that they could not long be companions or coöperate, since one would not operate at all. They would part at the first interesting crisis in their adventures. Above all, as I have implied, the man who goes alone can start to-day; but he who travels with another must wait till that other is ready, and it may be a long time before they get off.

Without a doubt, in this situation, what applies to one holds even more true for a thousand. A large house isn't proportionally more expensive than a small one, since one roof can cover, one cellar can hold up, and one wall can separate several apartments. However, I personally preferred a solitary home. Additionally, it’s usually cheaper to build everything yourself than to persuade someone else about the benefits of a shared wall. And if you do manage to convince them, the shared partition, being more affordable, will likely be thin, and that other person might turn out to be a bad neighbor who doesn’t maintain their side well. The only cooperation that tends to happen is very minimal and superficial; and even the little genuine cooperation there is feels almost nonexistent, like a harmony no one can hear. If someone has faith, they will cooperate with equal belief everywhere; if they don't have faith, they will continue to live like everyone else, regardless of the company they keep. To cooperate, in every sense, means to get our living together. I recently heard a suggestion that two young men should travel the world together, one without money, earning as he goes, working on ships and farming, while the other has a bill of exchange in his pocket. It was clear they couldn’t remain companions for long or cooperate, since one wouldn’t contribute at all. They would likely part ways at the first exciting moment in their adventures. As I've mentioned, the person who travels alone can start today, but the one traveling with someone else has to wait until that other person is ready, which could take a long time.

But all this is very selfish, I have heard some of my townsmen say. I confess that I have hitherto indulged very little in philanthropic enterprises. I have made some sacrifices to a sense of duty, and among others have sacrificed this pleasure also. There are those who have used all their arts to persuade me to undertake the support of some poor family in the town; and if I had nothing to do,—for the devil finds employment for the idle,—I might try my hand at some such pastime as that. However, when I have thought to indulge myself in this respect, and lay their Heaven under an obligation by maintaining certain poor persons in all respects as comfortably as I maintain myself, and have even ventured so far as to make them the offer, they have one and all unhesitatingly preferred to remain poor. While my townsmen and women are devoted in so many ways to the good of their fellows, I trust that one at least may be spared to other and less humane pursuits. You must have a genius for charity as well as for any thing else. As for Doing-good, that is one of the professions which are full. Moreover, I have tried it fairly, and, strange as it may seem, am satisfied that it does not agree with my constitution. Probably I should not consciously and deliberately forsake my particular calling to do the good which society demands of me, to save the universe from annihilation; and I believe that a like but infinitely greater steadfastness elsewhere is all that now preserves it. But I would not stand between any man and his genius; and to him who does this work, which I decline, with his whole heart and soul and life, I would say, Persevere, even if the world call it doing evil, as it is most likely they will.

But all this is pretty selfish, I've heard some of my neighbors say. I admit that I haven't really engaged in charitable activities much up until now. I've made some sacrifices out of a sense of duty, including sacrificing this pleasure too. There have been people who tried to convince me to support a poor family in town; and if I had nothing else to do—because idleness leads to trouble—I might consider doing something like that. However, when I've thought about indulging myself in this way and wanted to help some poor people live as comfortably as I do, and even offered to do so, they have all firmly chosen to stay poor. While my neighbors are dedicated to helping others in so many ways, I hope at least one of us can focus on other, less compassionate interests. You need to have a knack for charity, just like anything else. As for doing good, that's a profession that’s already crowded. Besides, I've given it a fair shot, and, strange as it may sound, I've come to realize it doesn’t suit me. I probably wouldn’t consciously leave my own path to do the good society expects of me, even to save the universe from destruction; and I think that a similar, even greater, commitment elsewhere is what keeps it all together. But I wouldn’t stand in the way of anyone and their own talent; and to those who take on this work that I refuse, with all their heart, soul, and life, I would say, Keep going, even if the world calls it doing wrong, which is very likely.

I am far from supposing that my case is a peculiar one; no doubt many of my readers would make a similar defence. At doing something,—I will not engage that my neighbors shall pronounce it good,—I do not hesitate to say that I should be a capital fellow to hire; but what that is, it is for my employer to find out. What good I do, in the common sense of that word, must be aside from my main path, and for the most part wholly unintended. Men say, practically, Begin where you are and such as you are, without aiming mainly to become of more worth, and with kindness aforethought go about doing good. If I were to preach at all in this strain, I should say rather, Set about being good. As if the sun should stop when he had kindled his fires up to the splendor of a moon or a star of the sixth magnitude, and go about like a Robin Goodfellow, peeping in at every cottage window, inspiring lunatics, and tainting meats, and making darkness visible, instead of steadily increasing his genial heat and beneficence till he is of such brightness that no mortal can look him in the face, and then, and in the mean while too, going about the world in his own orbit, doing it good, or rather, as a truer philosophy has discovered, the world going about him getting good. When Phaeton, wishing to prove his heavenly birth by his beneficence, had the sun’s chariot but one day, and drove out of the beaten track, he burned several blocks of houses in the lower streets of heaven, and scorched the surface of the earth, and dried up every spring, and made the great desert of Sahara, till at length Jupiter hurled him headlong to the earth with a thunderbolt, and the sun, through grief at his death, did not shine for a year.

I'm not saying that my situation is unique; many of my readers would probably defend themselves in a similar way. When it comes to doing something—I'm not sure my neighbors would call it good—I can confidently say I’d be a fantastic person to hire; it’s up to my employer to figure out what that is. The little bit of *good* I do, in the everyday sense of that word, is usually apart from my main focus and mostly unintentional. People often say, essentially, to start where you are and be who you are, without primarily aiming to be more valuable, and to go about doing good with kindness in mind. If I were to preach at all in this way, I would rather say, start by being good. It’s like the sun stopping once it’s glowing as bright as the moon or a sixth-magnitude star, going around peeking in every cottage window, inspiring madness, tainting food, and making darkness visible, instead of consistently boosting its warmth and goodness until it shines so brightly that no one can look at it directly, all while traveling in its own orbit, doing good for the world, or, as a truer philosophy has shown, the world going around it and receiving good. When Phaeton, wanting to prove his divine heritage by being benevolent, took the sun’s chariot for just one day and strayed from the usual path, he ended up burning down several blocks of heavenly homes, scorching the earth, drying up every spring, and creating the vast Sahara desert. In the end, Jupiter struck him down to earth with a thunderbolt, and out of grief for his death, the sun didn’t shine for a year.

There is no odor so bad as that which arises from goodness tainted. It is human, it is divine, carrion. If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I should run for my life, as from that dry and parching wind of the African deserts called the simoom, which fills the mouth and nose and ears and eyes with dust till you are suffocated, for fear that I should get some of his good done to me,—some of its virus mingled with my blood. No,—in this case I would rather suffer evil the natural way. A man is not a good man to me because he will feed me if I should be starving, or warm me if I should be freezing, or pull me out of a ditch if I should ever fall into one. I can find you a Newfoundland dog that will do as much. Philanthropy is not love for one’s fellow-man in the broadest sense. Howard was no doubt an exceedingly kind and worthy man in his way, and has his reward; but, comparatively speaking, what are a hundred Howards to us, if their philanthropy do not help us in our best estate, when we are most worthy to be helped? I never heard of a philanthropic meeting in which it was sincerely proposed to do any good to me, or the like of me.

There’s no smell worse than the one that comes from twisted goodness. It’s human, it’s divine, it’s rotting. If I knew for sure that someone was coming to my house with the intent to help me, I’d run away in a panic, like escaping the hot, suffocating winds of the African deserts known as the simoom, which fill your mouth, nose, ears, and eyes with dust until you can’t breathe. I’d fear that some of their well-meaning intentions would infect me with their negativity. No, in this case, I’d rather experience suffering the natural way. A person isn’t a good man to me just because he would feed me if I were starving, warm me if I were freezing, or pull me out of a ditch if I fell into one. I could find a Newfoundland dog that would do just as much. Philanthropy isn’t true love for one’s fellow man in the broadest sense. Howard was certainly a kind and decent man in his own way, and he’s earned his praise; but, compared to that, what are a hundred Howards to us if their philanthropy doesn’t help us when we’re at our best, when we most deserve support? I’ve never heard of a philanthropic meeting that genuinely aimed to do any good for me, or someone like me.

The Jesuits were quite balked by those Indians who, being burned at the stake, suggested new modes of torture to their tormentors. Being superior to physical suffering, it sometimes chanced that they were superior to any consolation which the missionaries could offer; and the law to do as you would be done by fell with less persuasiveness on the ears of those who, for their part, did not care how they were done by, who loved their enemies after a new fashion, and came very near freely forgiving them all they did.

The Jesuits were really taken aback by the Indians who, while being burned at the stake, proposed new ways to torture their tormentors. Being above physical suffering, there were times when they were also above any comfort the missionaries could provide; and the principle of treating others as you would like to be treated had less impact on those who, for their part, didn’t care how they were treated, who loved their enemies in a different way, and were quite close to genuinely forgiving everything they did.

Be sure that you give the poor the aid they most need, though it be your example which leaves them far behind. If you give money, spend yourself with it, and do not merely abandon it to them. We make curious mistakes sometimes. Often the poor man is not so cold and hungry as he is dirty and ragged and gross. It is partly his taste, and not merely his misfortune. If you give him money, he will perhaps buy more rags with it. I was wont to pity the clumsy Irish laborers who cut ice on the pond, in such mean and ragged clothes, while I shivered in my more tidy and somewhat more fashionable garments, till, one bitter cold day, one who had slipped into the water came to my house to warm him, and I saw him strip off three pairs of pants and two pairs of stockings ere he got down to the skin, though they were dirty and ragged enough, it is true, and that he could afford to refuse the extra garments which I offered him, he had so many intra ones. This ducking was the very thing he needed. Then I began to pity myself, and I saw that it would be a greater charity to bestow on me a flannel shirt than a whole slop-shop on him. There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root, and it may be that he who bestows the largest amount of time and money on the needy is doing the most by his mode of life to produce that misery which he strives in vain to relieve. It is the pious slave-breeder devoting the proceeds of every tenth slave to buy a Sunday’s liberty for the rest. Some show their kindness to the poor by employing them in their kitchens. Would they not be kinder if they employed themselves there? You boast of spending a tenth part of your income in charity; maybe you should spend the nine tenths so, and done with it. Society recovers only a tenth part of the property then. Is this owing to the generosity of him in whose possession it is found, or to the remissness of the officers of justice?

Make sure you give the poor the help they really need, even if your example sets them back. If you give money, put in some effort along with it, and don’t just throw it at them. We sometimes make strange mistakes. Often, the poor person isn’t as cold and hungry as they are just dirty, ragged, and unkempt. It’s partly their choice, not just their circumstance. If you give them money, they might just buy more tattered clothes with it. I used to feel sorry for the clumsy Irish workers who cut ice on the pond in such shabby clothes, while I stood there shivering in my nicer, more fashionable attire. Then, one freezing day, a man who had fallen into the water came to my house to warm up. I watched him take off three pairs of pants and two pairs of socks before he got down to his skin, and while they were indeed dirty and tattered, he had so many layers underneath that he could easily decline the extra clothes I offered him. That cold dip was exactly what he needed. After that, I started to feel sorry for myself and realized that giving me a flannel shirt would be a greater act of kindness than piling a whole store's worth of clothes on him. There are thousands trying to tackle the symptoms of our problems while only a few are addressing the root causes. Often, the person who gives the most time and money to the needy might inadvertently be contributing to the very misery they're trying to alleviate. It's like the pious slave owner who gives away a portion of the profits from every tenth slave to buy one day of freedom for the others. Some demonstrate their kindness by hiring the poor to work in their kitchens. Wouldn't it be kinder if they worked there themselves? You brag about donating a tenth of your income to charity; maybe you should invest the other nine-tenths in a similar way and just be done with it. Society only gets back a tenth of the wealth as a result. Is this because of the generosity of the person who has it, or the negligence of those in charge of justice?

Philanthropy is almost the only virtue which is sufficiently appreciated by mankind. Nay, it is greatly overrated; and it is our selfishness which overrates it. A robust poor man, one sunny day here in Concord, praised a fellow-townsman to me, because, as he said, he was kind to the poor; meaning himself. The kind uncles and aunts of the race are more esteemed than its true spiritual fathers and mothers. I once heard a reverend lecturer on England, a man of learning and intelligence, after enumerating her scientific, literary, and political worthies, Shakespeare, Bacon, Cromwell, Milton, Newton, and others, speak next of her Christian heroes, whom, as if his profession required it of him, he elevated to a place far above all the rest, as the greatest of the great. They were Penn, Howard, and Mrs. Fry. Every one must feel the falsehood and cant of this. The last were not England’s best men and women; only, perhaps, her best philanthropists.

Philanthropy is pretty much the only value that people really recognize. In fact, it’s often overhyped, and it’s our own self-interest that inflates its importance. One sunny day in Concord, a strong poor man praised a fellow townsman to me because, as he put it, he was kind to the poor—meaning himself. The kind-hearted uncles and aunts of society are held in higher regard than its actual spiritual leaders. I once heard a learned and insightful lecturer on England list her scientific, literary, and political icons—Shakespeare, Bacon, Cromwell, Milton, Newton, and others—then go on to talk about her Christian heroes, elevating them to a status far above everyone else as the greatest of the great. Those heroes were Penn, Howard, and Mrs. Fry. Anyone can see the dishonesty and hypocrisy in that. The latter were not England's finest individuals; they were perhaps just her top philanthropists.

I would not subtract any thing from the praise that is due to philanthropy, but merely demand justice for all who by their lives and works are a blessing to mankind. I do not value chiefly a man’s uprightness and benevolence, which are, as it were, his stem and leaves. Those plants of whose greenness withered we make herb tea for the sick, serve but a humble use, and are most employed by quacks. I want the flower and fruit of a man; that some fragrance be wafted over from him to me, and some ripeness flavor our intercourse. His goodness must not be a partial and transitory act, but a constant superfluity, which costs him nothing and of which he is unconscious. This is a charity that hides a multitude of sins. The philanthropist too often surrounds mankind with the remembrance of his own cast-off griefs as an atmosphere, and calls it sympathy. We should impart our courage, and not our despair, our health and ease, and not our disease, and take care that this does not spread by contagion. From what southern plains comes up the voice of wailing? Under what latitudes reside the heathen to whom we would send light? Who is that intemperate and brutal man whom we would redeem? If any thing ail a man, so that he does not perform his functions, if he have a pain in his bowels even,—for that is the seat of sympathy,—he forthwith sets about reforming—the world. Being a microcosm himself, he discovers, and it is a true discovery, and he is the man to make it,—that the world has been eating green apples; to his eyes, in fact, the globe itself is a great green apple, which there is danger awful to think of that the children of men will nibble before it is ripe; and straightway his drastic philanthropy seeks out the Esquimaux and the Patagonian, and embraces the populous Indian and Chinese villages; and thus, by a few years of philanthropic activity, the powers in the mean while using him for their own ends, no doubt, he cures himself of his dyspepsia, the globe acquires a faint blush on one or both of its cheeks, as if it were beginning to be ripe, and life loses its crudity and is once more sweet and wholesome to live. I never dreamed of any enormity greater than I have committed. I never knew, and never shall know, a worse man than myself.

I wouldn't take away anything from the praise that philanthropy deserves, but I just want justice for everyone who, through their lives and work, blesses humanity. I don't primarily value a person's honesty and kindness, which are like their stem and leaves. Those plants, whose wilted green we use to make herbal tea for the sick, serve only a basic purpose and are mostly utilized by frauds. I want the flower and fruit of a person; I want some of their fragrance to come my way and some of their ripeness to flavor our interactions. Their goodness should not just be a temporary or occasional act, but a constant overflow that doesn’t cost them anything and of which they are unaware. This is a charity that covers a multitude of faults. The philanthropist too often surrounds humanity with the weight of their own discarded sorrows as if it were an atmosphere and calls it sympathy. We should share our courage, not our despair; our health and comfort, not our sickness; and ensure that this doesn't spread as a contagion. From what southern plains does the voice of mourning arise? Under what skies do the uneducated live that we wish to enlighten? Who is that excessive and brutal person we want to save? If something is wrong with a person, making them unable to perform their duties, even if they have a pain in their stomach—which is the center of sympathy—they immediately set out to reform the world. Being a microcosm themselves, they realize, and it is indeed a true realization, that the world has been consuming unripe fruit; to them, the globe itself is like a massive green apple, and they fear that humankind will nibble at it before it's ready; and right away, their drastic philanthropy reaches out to the Eskimos and the Patagonians, embracing the numerous Indian and Chinese communities; and so, through a few years of philanthropic effort—while the forces are undoubtedly using them for their own purposes—they cure their own indigestion, the globe gains a bit of color, as if it’s beginning to ripen, and life loses its harshness, becoming sweet and pleasant to live in once again. I never imagined any wrongdoing greater than what I have done. I have never met, and will never meet, a worse person than myself.

I believe that what so saddens the reformer is not his sympathy with his fellows in distress, but, though he be the holiest son of God, is his private ail. Let this be righted, let the spring come to him, the morning rise over his couch, and he will forsake his generous companions without apology. My excuse for not lecturing against the use of tobacco is, that I never chewed it; that is a penalty which reformed tobacco-chewers have to pay; though there are things enough I have chewed, which I could lecture against. If you should ever be betrayed into any of these philanthropies, do not let your left hand know what your right hand does, for it is not worth knowing. Rescue the drowning and tie your shoe-strings. Take your time, and set about some free labor.

I think what truly saddens the reformer isn’t just his empathy for others in pain, but, even if he's the most virtuous person, it’s his own inner struggle. If that gets resolved, if spring arrives for him, if the morning shines on his bed, he will leave his noble friends without a second thought. The reason I don’t lecture against tobacco use is that I’ve never chewed it; that’s a burden reformed tobacco chewers have to bear. Although there are plenty of things I have chewed that I could speak out against. If you ever get caught up in any of these charitable efforts, keep it to yourself; there’s no need for your left hand to know what your right hand is doing, because it’s not worth knowing. Save those who are drowning and tie your shoe laces. Take your time and engage in some voluntary work.

Our manners have been corrupted by communication with the saints. Our hymn-books resound with a melodious cursing of God and enduring him forever. One would say that even the prophets and redeemers had rather consoled the fears than confirmed the hopes of man. There is nowhere recorded a simple and irrepressible satisfaction with the gift of life, any memorable praise of God. All health and success does me good, however far off and withdrawn it may appear; all disease and failure helps to make me sad and does me evil, however much sympathy it may have with me or I with it. If, then, we would indeed restore mankind by truly Indian, botanic, magnetic, or natural means, let us first be as simple and well as Nature ourselves, dispel the clouds which hang over our own brows, and take up a little life into our pores. Do not stay to be an overseer of the poor, but endeavor to become one of the worthies of the world.

Our manners have been messed up by our interactions with saints. Our hymn-books echo with a melodious criticism of God, enduring for eternity. It seems that even the prophets and saviors were more about easing fears than uplifting human hopes. There's no record of a straightforward and unstoppable joy in the gift of life, no memorable praise for God. Good health and success benefit me, no matter how distant they seem; sickness and failure make me sad and harm me, regardless of the sympathy shared. So, if we really want to uplift humanity through truly Indian, botanical, magnetic, or natural ways, let's first be as simple and healthy as Nature itself, clear the clouds over our own heads, and bring a bit of life into our being. Don’t just be a watcher over the poor; strive to become one of the greats in the world.

I read in the Gulistan, or Flower Garden, of Sheik Sadi of Shiraz, that “They asked a wise man, saying; Of the many celebrated trees which the Most High God has created lofty and umbrageous, they call none azad, or free, excepting the cypress, which bears no fruit; what mystery is there in this? He replied; Each has its appropriate produce, and appointed season, during the continuance of which it is fresh and blooming, and during their absence dry and withered; to neither of which states is the cypress exposed, being always flourishing; and of this nature are the azads, or religious independents.—Fix not thy heart on that which is transitory; for the Dijlah, or Tigris, will continue to flow through Bagdad after the race of caliphs is extinct: if thy hand has plenty, be liberal as the date tree; but if it affords nothing to give away, be an azad, or free man, like the cypress.”

I read in the Gulistan, or Flower Garden, by Sheikh Sadi of Shiraz, that “They asked a wise man, saying: Of all the many famous trees that the Most High God has created, tall and shady, none are called azad, or free, except for the cypress, which bears no fruit. What’s the reason for this? He replied: Each tree has its own purpose and season, during which it is fresh and blooming, and when it’s not, it becomes dry and withered; the cypress, however, isn’t affected by either state, as it always thrives; and the same goes for the azads, or religious independents. Don’t fix your heart on what is temporary; because the Dijlah, or Tigris, will keep flowing through Bagdad long after the caliphs are gone: if you have plenty to give, be generous like the date tree; but if you have nothing to share, be like the cypress, an azad, or free person.”

COMPLEMENTAL VERSES

The Pretensions of Poverty

“Thou dost presume too much, poor needy wretch,
To claim a station in the firmament
Because thy humble cottage, or thy tub,
Nurses some lazy or pedantic virtue
In the cheap sunshine or by shady springs,
With roots and pot-herbs; where thy right hand,
Tearing those humane passions from the mind,
Upon whose stocks fair blooming virtues flourish,
Degradeth nature, and benumbeth sense,
And, Gorgon-like, turns active men to stone.
We not require the dull society
Of your necessitated temperance,
Or that unnatural stupidity
That knows nor joy nor sorrow; nor your forc’d
Falsely exalted passive fortitude
Above the active. This low abject brood,
That fix their seats in mediocrity,
Become your servile minds; but we advance
Such virtues only as admit excess,
Brave, bounteous acts, regal magnificence,
All-seeing prudence, magnanimity
That knows no bound, and that heroic virtue
For which antiquity hath left no name,
But patterns only, such as Hercules,
Achilles, Theseus. Back to thy loath’d cell;
And when thou seest the new enlightened sphere,
Study to know but what those worthies were.”
                                    T. CAREW

COMPLEMENTAL VERSES

The Pretensions of Poverty

"You think too highly of yourself, poor needy wretch,
To claim a place in the sky
Just because your humble cottage, or your tub,
Supports some lazy or pedantic virtue
In the cheap sunlight or by shady springs,
With roots and pot-herbs; where your right hand,
Cleansing those humane passions from the mind,
From which fair blooming virtues grow,
Degrades nature and numbs the senses,
And, like a Gorgon, turns active men to stone.
We do not need the dull company
Of your forced temperance,
Or that unnatural stupidity
That knows neither joy nor sorrow; nor your forced
Falsely exalted passive strength
Above the active. This low and abject crowd,
That settles for mediocrity,
Becomes your enslaved minds; but we promote
Only those virtues that allow for excess,
Brave, generous actions, royal magnificence,
All-seeing wisdom, greatness of spirit
That knows no limits, and that heroic virtue
For which ancient times left no name,
But only examples, like Hercules,
Achilles, Theseus. Go back to your hated cell;
And when you see the newly enlightened world,
Strive to understand what those great figures were.”
                                    T. CAREW

Where I Lived, and What I Lived For

At a certain season of our life we are accustomed to consider every spot as the possible site of a house. I have thus surveyed the country on every side within a dozen miles of where I live. In imagination I have bought all the farms in succession, for all were to be bought, and I knew their price. I walked over each farmer’s premises, tasted his wild apples, discoursed on husbandry with him, took his farm at his price, at any price, mortgaging it to him in my mind; even put a higher price on it,—took everything but a deed of it,—took his word for his deed, for I dearly love to talk,—cultivated it, and him too to some extent, I trust, and withdrew when I had enjoyed it long enough, leaving him to carry it on. This experience entitled me to be regarded as a sort of real-estate broker by my friends. Wherever I sat, there I might live, and the landscape radiated from me accordingly. What is a house but a sedes, a seat?—better if a country seat. I discovered many a site for a house not likely to be soon improved, which some might have thought too far from the village, but to my eyes the village was too far from it. Well, there I might live, I said; and there I did live, for an hour, a summer and a winter life; saw how I could let the years run off, buffet the winter through, and see the spring come in. The future inhabitants of this region, wherever they may place their houses, may be sure that they have been anticipated. An afternoon sufficed to lay out the land into orchard, woodlot, and pasture, and to decide what fine oaks or pines should be left to stand before the door, and whence each blasted tree could be seen to the best advantage; and then I let it lie, fallow perchance, for a man is rich in proportion to the number of things which he can afford to let alone.

At certain points in our lives, we tend to see every place as a potential spot for a house. I've explored the area around my home within a twelve-mile radius. In my imagination, I've bought all the farms in order, since they were all for sale, and I knew their prices. I walked around each farmer’s property, sampled their wild apples, chatted with them about farming, accepted their prices for the land, even at any price, mortgaging it to them in my mind; I even valued it higher—took everything but an actual deed for it—trusted their word as a deed because I love to talk—cultivated both the land and the farmers as much as I could, and left when I had enjoyed it long enough, allowing them to manage it. Because of this, my friends considered me a sort of real-estate broker. Wherever I sat, I felt at home, and the landscape spread out from there. What is a house if not a place to sit?—better yet, a country home. I found many spots for a house that probably wouldn't be developed soon, which some might have deemed too distant from the village, but to me, the village felt too far away. I thought to myself, there I could live; and for a while, I did live there, for an hour, experiencing summer and winter; I saw how I could let the years pass, endure the winter, and welcome spring. Future inhabitants of this area, no matter where they build their houses, can be sure that their choices have already been imagined. An afternoon was enough to organize the land into orchards, woodlots, and pastures, to choose which beautiful oaks or pines should stay in front, and to determine the best view for each dead tree; and then I let it remain fallow, because a person is wealthy in proportion to how many things they can afford to leave alone.

My imagination carried me so far that I even had the refusal of several farms,—the refusal was all I wanted,—but I never got my fingers burned by actual possession. The nearest that I came to actual possession was when I bought the Hollowell place, and had begun to sort my seeds, and collected materials with which to make a wheelbarrow to carry it on or off with; but before the owner gave me a deed of it, his wife—every man has such a wife—changed her mind and wished to keep it, and he offered me ten dollars to release him. Now, to speak the truth, I had but ten cents in the world, and it surpassed my arithmetic to tell, if I was that man who had ten cents, or who had a farm, or ten dollars, or all together. However, I let him keep the ten dollars and the farm too, for I had carried it far enough; or rather, to be generous, I sold him the farm for just what I gave for it, and, as he was not a rich man, made him a present of ten dollars, and still had my ten cents, and seeds, and materials for a wheelbarrow left. I found thus that I had been a rich man without any damage to my poverty. But I retained the landscape, and I have since annually carried off what it yielded without a wheelbarrow. With respect to landscapes,—

My imagination took me so far that I even turned down several farms—the refusal was all I needed—but I never actually got stuck with one. The closest I came to owning property was when I bought the Hollowell place, started sorting my seeds, and gathered materials to make a wheelbarrow to transport them. But before I got the deed from the owner, his wife—every guy has one of those—changed her mind and wanted to keep it. He offered me ten dollars to back out. Honestly, I only had ten cents to my name, and I couldn't figure out whether I was the guy with ten cents, or a farm, or ten dollars, or a combination of them all. In the end, I let him keep both the ten dollars and the farm because I felt I'd gone far enough; or to be fair, I sold him the farm for exactly what I paid for it, and since he wasn't rich, I gave him ten dollars as a gift. I still had my ten cents, my seeds, and my materials for a wheelbarrow. This way, I felt like I was wealthier without losing my poverty. I kept the landscape, and since then, I've been collecting what it produced every year without needing a wheelbarrow. Regarding landscapes,—

“I am monarch of all I survey,
My right there is none to dispute.”

“I am the ruler of everything I see,
No one has the right to challenge that.”

I have frequently seen a poet withdraw, having enjoyed the most valuable part of a farm, while the crusty farmer supposed that he had got a few wild apples only. Why, the owner does not know it for many years when a poet has put his farm in rhyme, the most admirable kind of invisible fence, has fairly impounded it, milked it, skimmed it, and got all the cream, and left the farmer only the skimmed milk.

I’ve often seen a poet take a step back after enjoying the best part of a farm, while the grumpy farmer believes he’s only gotten a few wild apples. The owner often doesn’t realize for years that a poet has put his farm into a poem, creating the most amazing kind of invisible fence, effectively contained it, taken its essence, skimming off the best part, leaving the farmer with just the leftover bits.

The real attractions of the Hollowell farm, to me, were; its complete retirement, being, about two miles from the village, half a mile from the nearest neighbor, and separated from the highway by a broad field; its bounding on the river, which the owner said protected it by its fogs from frosts in the spring, though that was nothing to me; the gray color and ruinous state of the house and barn, and the dilapidated fences, which put such an interval between me and the last occupant; the hollow and lichen-covered apple trees, gnawed by rabbits, showing what kind of neighbors I should have; but above all, the recollection I had of it from my earliest voyages up the river, when the house was concealed behind a dense grove of red maples, through which I heard the house-dog bark. I was in haste to buy it, before the proprietor finished getting out some rocks, cutting down the hollow apple trees, and grubbing up some young birches which had sprung up in the pasture, or, in short, had made any more of his improvements. To enjoy these advantages I was ready to carry it on; like Atlas, to take the world on my shoulders,—I never heard what compensation he received for that,—and do all those things which had no other motive or excuse but that I might pay for it and be unmolested in my possession of it; for I knew all the while that it would yield the most abundant crop of the kind I wanted if I could only afford to let it alone. But it turned out as I have said.

The real attractions of the Hollowell farm for me were its complete seclusion, located about two miles from the village, half a mile from the nearest neighbor, and separated from the highway by a wide field; its border along the river, which the owner claimed protected it from spring frosts with its fogs, though that didn’t matter much to me; the gray color and dilapidated state of the house and barn, and the falling-apart fences, which created a distance between me and the last occupant; the hollow, lichen-covered apple trees, chewed by rabbits, giving me a hint about what kind of neighbors I'd have; but most importantly, the memories I had of it from my earliest trips up the river, when the house was hidden behind a thick grove of red maples, through which I could hear the house-dog bark. I was eager to buy it before the owner finished removing some rocks, cutting down the hollow apple trees, and uprooting some young birches that had popped up in the pasture, or, in short, made any more improvements. To enjoy these benefits, I was ready to take it on, like Atlas carrying the world on his shoulders—I never found out what compensation he got for that—and do all those things without any other motivation or excuse except to pay for it and have peace in my ownership; because I knew all along that it would yield the best crop of what I wanted if I could just afford to leave it alone. But it turned out as I’ve said.

All that I could say, then, with respect to farming on a large scale, (I have always cultivated a garden,) was, that I had had my seeds ready. Many think that seeds improve with age. I have no doubt that time discriminates between the good and the bad; and when at last I shall plant, I shall be less likely to be disappointed. But I would say to my fellows, once for all, As long as possible live free and uncommitted. It makes but little difference whether you are committed to a farm or the county jail.

All I can say about large-scale farming (I've always had a garden) is that I had my seeds ready. Many people believe seeds get better with age. I’m sure that time helps to separate the good from the bad, and when I finally plant, I’ll be less likely to be let down. But I want to tell my peers, once and for all, to live free and uncommitted for as long as you can. It doesn’t matter much whether you’re tied to a farm or stuck in county jail.

Old Cato, whose “De Re Rusticâ” is my “Cultivator,” says, and the only translation I have seen makes sheer nonsense of the passage, “When you think of getting a farm, turn it thus in your mind, not to buy greedily; nor spare your pains to look at it, and do not think it enough to go round it once. The oftener you go there the more it will please you, if it is good.” I think I shall not buy greedily, but go round and round it as long as I live, and be buried in it first, that it may please me the more at last.

Old Cato, whose “De Re Rusticâ” is my “Cultivator,” says, and the only translation I’ve seen makes total nonsense of the passage, “When you consider getting a farm, think about it like this: don’t rush to buy; really take your time to check it out, and don’t just think it’s enough to visit once. The more you go there, the more you’ll appreciate it, if it’s a good place.” I believe I won’t rush to buy, but I’ll explore it over and over for as long as I live, and I’ll be buried there first, so I can appreciate it even more in the end.

The present was my next experiment of this kind, which I purpose to describe more at length; for convenience, putting the experience of two years into one. As I have said, I do not propose to write an ode to dejection, but to brag as lustily as chanticleer in the morning, standing on his roost, if only to wake my neighbors up.

The present is my next experiment of this sort, which I plan to detail more thoroughly; for convenience, I'm combining the experiences of two years into one. As I've mentioned, I'm not planning to write a lament about feeling down, but to crow as loudly as a rooster in the morning, standing on his perch, just to wake my neighbors up.

When first I took up my abode in the woods, that is, began to spend my nights as well as days there, which, by accident, was on Independence Day, or the Fourth of July, 1845, my house was not finished for winter, but was merely a defence against the rain, without plastering or chimney, the walls being of rough, weather-stained boards, with wide chinks, which made it cool at night. The upright white hewn studs and freshly planed door and window casings gave it a clean and airy look, especially in the morning, when its timbers were saturated with dew, so that I fancied that by noon some sweet gum would exude from them. To my imagination it retained throughout the day more or less of this auroral character, reminding me of a certain house on a mountain which I had visited the year before. This was an airy and unplastered cabin, fit to entertain a travelling god, and where a goddess might trail her garments. The winds which passed over my dwelling were such as sweep over the ridges of mountains, bearing the broken strains, or celestial parts only, of terrestrial music. The morning wind forever blows, the poem of creation is uninterrupted; but few are the ears that hear it. Olympus is but the outside of the earth every where.

When I first moved into the woods, meaning I started spending my nights as well as my days there, which happened to be on Independence Day, or the Fourth of July, 1845, my house wasn't ready for winter yet. It was just a shelter from the rain, with no plaster or chimney, and the walls were made of rough, weathered boards with big gaps that made it cool at night. The straight white hewn studs and freshly planed door and window frames gave it a clean and airy feel, especially in the morning when the wood was soaked with dew, making me think that by noon some sweet sap would ooze from them. To me, it kept this fresh morning vibe throughout the day, reminding me of a house on a mountain I had visited the year before. This was a breezy, unplastered cabin, perfect for a wandering god, where a goddess might walk gracefully. The winds that flowed over my place were like those that sweep over mountain ridges, carrying only the broken melodies or heavenly fragments of earthly music. The morning wind never stops blowing; the song of creation goes on uninterrupted, but few people truly hear it. Olympus is just the outer layer of the earth everywhere.

The only house I had been the owner of before, if I except a boat, was a tent, which I used occasionally when making excursions in the summer, and this is still rolled up in my garret; but the boat, after passing from hand to hand, has gone down the stream of time. With this more substantial shelter about me, I had made some progress toward settling in the world. This frame, so slightly clad, was a sort of crystallization around me, and reacted on the builder. It was suggestive somewhat as a picture in outlines. I did not need to go outdoors to take the air, for the atmosphere within had lost none of its freshness. It was not so much within doors as behind a door where I sat, even in the rainiest weather. The Harivansa says, “An abode without birds is like a meat without seasoning.” Such was not my abode, for I found myself suddenly neighbor to the birds; not by having imprisoned one, but having caged myself near them. I was not only nearer to some of those which commonly frequent the garden and the orchard, but to those wilder and more thrilling songsters of the forest which never, or rarely, serenade a villager,—the wood-thrush, the veery, the scarlet tanager, the field-sparrow, the whippoorwill, and many others.

The only place I owned before, aside from a boat, was a tent that I occasionally used for summer trips, and it's still rolled up in my attic. The boat, after changing hands a few times, has flowed away down the river of time. With this more solid shelter around me, I had made some progress in settling down. This frame, so lightly covered, felt like a kind of crystallization around me, influencing the builder. It was somewhat like a picture outlined. I didn't need to go outside to get fresh air because the atmosphere inside had kept its freshness. I wasn't really indoors but rather just behind a door, even during the rainiest weather. The Harivansa says, “A home without birds is like meat without seasoning.” That definitely wasn't my home, as I found myself suddenly surrounded by birds—not because I had caged one, but because I had placed myself close to them. I was not only closer to the common birds that hang out in the garden and orchard but also to the wilder, more exciting singers of the forest who rarely serenade a village—the wood-thrush, the veery, the scarlet tanager, the field sparrow, the whippoorwill, and many others.

I was seated by the shore of a small pond, about a mile and a half south of the village of Concord and somewhat higher than it, in the midst of an extensive wood between that town and Lincoln, and about two miles south of that our only field known to fame, Concord Battle Ground; but I was so low in the woods that the opposite shore, half a mile off, like the rest, covered with wood, was my most distant horizon. For the first week, whenever I looked out on the pond it impressed me like a tarn high up on the side of a mountain, its bottom far above the surface of other lakes, and, as the sun arose, I saw it throwing off its nightly clothing of mist, and here and there, by degrees, its soft ripples or its smooth reflecting surface was revealed, while the mists, like ghosts, were stealthily withdrawing in every direction into the woods, as at the breaking up of some nocturnal conventicle. The very dew seemed to hang upon the trees later into the day than usual, as on the sides of mountains.

I was sitting by the edge of a small pond, about a mile and a half south of the village of Concord and a bit higher than it, surrounded by a large forest between that town and Lincoln, and about two miles south of our only famous field, Concord Battle Ground. But I was so low in the woods that the opposite shore, half a mile away, like the rest, covered in trees, was my farthest view. For the first week, whenever I looked at the pond, it felt like a small lake high up on a mountain, its bottom much higher than other lakes. As the sun rose, I watched it shake off its nightly blanket of mist, and gradually its soft ripples and smooth, reflective surface were revealed, while the mists, like ghosts, quietly retreated in every direction into the woods, as if breaking up a midnight gathering. Even the dew seemed to linger on the trees later into the day than usual, like on the slopes of mountains.

This small lake was of most value as a neighbor in the intervals of a gentle rain storm in August, when, both air and water being perfectly still, but the sky overcast, mid-afternoon had all the serenity of evening, and the wood-thrush sang around, and was heard from shore to shore. A lake like this is never smoother than at such a time; and the clear portion of the air above it being shallow and darkened by clouds, the water, full of light and reflections, becomes a lower heaven itself so much the more important. From a hill top near by, where the wood had been recently cut off, there was a pleasing vista southward across the pond, through a wide indentation in the hills which form the shore there, where their opposite sides sloping toward each other suggested a stream flowing out in that direction through a wooded valley, but stream there was none. That way I looked between and over the near green hills to some distant and higher ones in the horizon, tinged with blue. Indeed, by standing on tiptoe I could catch a glimpse of some of the peaks of the still bluer and more distant mountain ranges in the north-west, those true-blue coins from heaven’s own mint, and also of some portion of the village. But in other directions, even from this point, I could not see over or beyond the woods which surrounded me. It is well to have some water in your neighborhood, to give buoyancy to and float the earth. One value even of the smallest well is, that when you look into it you see that earth is not continent but insular. This is as important as that it keeps butter cool. When I looked across the pond from this peak toward the Sudbury meadows, which in time of flood I distinguished elevated perhaps by a mirage in their seething valley, like a coin in a basin, all the earth beyond the pond appeared like a thin crust insulated and floated even by this small sheet of interverting water, and I was reminded that this on which I dwelt was but dry land.

This small lake was most valuable as a neighbor during a gentle rainstorm in August, when both the air and water were perfectly still, and the sky was overcast. Mid-afternoon felt as serene as evening, with the wood-thrush singing all around, echoing from shore to shore. A lake like this is never smoother than at such moments, and with the air above it being shallow and darkened by clouds, the water, filled with light and reflections, transforms into a kind of lower heaven. From a nearby hilltop, where the woods had recently been cut down, there was a pleasing view southward across the pond, through a wide indentation in the hills that form the shore, where the opposite sides sloped toward each other, suggesting a stream flowing out in that direction through a wooded valley, though there was no actual stream. From there, I looked between and over the nearby green hills toward some distant, higher hills on the horizon, tinged with blue. In fact, by standing on tiptoe, I could catch a glimpse of some peaks of the even bluer and more distant mountain ranges to the northwest, those true-blue coins from heaven’s own mint, as well as a portion of the village. However, in other directions, even from this point, I couldn't see over or beyond the woods surrounding me. It's good to have some water in your neighborhood to add buoyancy and support the land. One value, even of the smallest well, is that when you look into it, you see that the earth is not a continent but an island. This is as significant as keeping butter cool. As I looked across the pond from this peak toward the Sudbury meadows, which during floods I could distinguish as elevated, perhaps by a mirage in their seething valley, like a coin in a basin, all the land beyond the pond appeared as a thin crust insulated and supported even by this small sheet of water, reminding me that what I stood on was merely dry land.

Though the view from my door was still more contracted, I did not feel crowded or confined in the least. There was pasture enough for my imagination. The low shrub-oak plateau to which the opposite shore arose, stretched away toward the prairies of the West and the steppes of Tartary, affording ample room for all the roving families of men. “There are none happy in the world but beings who enjoy freely a vast horizon,”—said Damodara, when his herds required new and larger pastures.

Though the view from my door was still limited, I didn't feel cramped or restricted at all. There was plenty of space for my imagination. The low shrub-oak plateau on the opposite shore extended toward the Western prairies and the steppes of Tartary, providing ample room for all the wandering families of people. “Only those who can freely enjoy a vast horizon are truly happy in the world,” said Damodara when his herds needed new and larger pastures.

Both place and time were changed, and I dwelt nearer to those parts of the universe and to those eras in history which had most attracted me. Where I lived was as far off as many a region viewed nightly by astronomers. We are wont to imagine rare and delectable places in some remote and more celestial corner of the system, behind the constellation of Cassiopeia’s Chair, far from noise and disturbance. I discovered that my house actually had its site in such a withdrawn, but forever new and unprofaned, part of the universe. If it were worth the while to settle in those parts near to the Pleiades or the Hyades, to Aldebaran or Altair, then I was really there, or at an equal remoteness from the life which I had left behind, dwindled and twinkling with as fine a ray to my nearest neighbor, and to be seen only in moonless nights by him. Such was that part of creation where I had squatted;—

Both place and time had changed, and I lived closer to those areas of the universe and those historical periods that intrigued me the most. My home was as distant as many regions observed nightly by astronomers. We often imagine rare and beautiful locations in some faraway and more celestial part of the system, behind the constellation of Cassiopeia’s Chair, far from noise and chaos. I found out that my house was actually situated in such a secluded, but eternally fresh and untarnished, part of the universe. If it was worth the effort to settle in areas near the Pleiades or the Hyades, to Aldebaran or Altair, then I was truly there, or at an equal distance from the life I had left behind, dwindled and twinkling with as fine a light to my nearest neighbor, visible only on moonless nights to him. Such was that part of creation where I had made my home;—

“There was a shepherd that did live,
    And held his thoughts as high
As were the mounts whereon his flocks
    Did hourly feed him by.”

“There was a shepherd who lived,
    And held his thoughts as high
As the mountains where his flocks
    Did feed him every hour.”

What should we think of the shepherd’s life if his flocks always wandered to higher pastures than his thoughts?

What should we make of the shepherd's life if his flocks always roamed to better pastures than his thoughts?

Every morning was a cheerful invitation to make my life of equal simplicity, and I may say innocence, with Nature herself. I have been as sincere a worshipper of Aurora as the Greeks. I got up early and bathed in the pond; that was a religious exercise, and one of the best things which I did. They say that characters were engraven on the bathing tub of king Tching-thang to this effect: “Renew thyself completely each day; do it again, and again, and forever again.” I can understand that. Morning brings back the heroic ages. I was as much affected by the faint hum of a mosquito making its invisible and unimaginable tour through my apartment at earliest dawn, when I was sitting with door and windows open, as I could be by any trumpet that ever sang of fame. It was Homer’s requiem; itself an Iliad and Odyssey in the air, singing its own wrath and wanderings. There was something cosmical about it; a standing advertisement, till forbidden, of the everlasting vigor and fertility of the world. The morning, which is the most memorable season of the day, is the awakening hour. Then there is least somnolence in us; and for an hour, at least, some part of us awakes which slumbers all the rest of the day and night. Little is to be expected of that day, if it can be called a day, to which we are not awakened by our Genius, but by the mechanical nudgings of some servitor, are not awakened by our own newly-acquired force and aspirations from within, accompanied by the undulations of celestial music, instead of factory bells, and a fragrance filling the air—to a higher life than we fell asleep from; and thus the darkness bear its fruit, and prove itself to be good, no less than the light. That man who does not believe that each day contains an earlier, more sacred, and auroral hour than he has yet profaned, has despaired of life, and is pursuing a descending and darkening way. After a partial cessation of his sensuous life, the soul of man, or its organs rather, are reinvigorated each day, and his Genius tries again what noble life it can make. All memorable events, I should say, transpire in morning time and in a morning atmosphere. The Vedas say, “All intelligences awake with the morning.” Poetry and art, and the fairest and most memorable of the actions of men, date from such an hour. All poets and heroes, like Memnon, are the children of Aurora, and emit their music at sunrise. To him whose elastic and vigorous thought keeps pace with the sun, the day is a perpetual morning. It matters not what the clocks say or the attitudes and labors of men. Morning is when I am awake and there is a dawn in me. Moral reform is the effort to throw off sleep. Why is it that men give so poor an account of their day if they have not been slumbering? They are not such poor calculators. If they had not been overcome with drowsiness, they would have performed something. The millions are awake enough for physical labor; but only one in a million is awake enough for effective intellectual exertion, only one in a hundred millions to a poetic or divine life. To be awake is to be alive. I have never yet met a man who was quite awake. How could I have looked him in the face?

Every morning felt like a joyful invitation to simplify my life, much like Nature itself. I’ve been as genuine a lover of the dawn as the Greeks were. I woke up early and bathed in the pond; that was a sacred act and one of the best things I did. They say that characters were engraved on the bathing tub of King Tching-thang that said: “Renew yourself completely each day; do it again, and again, and forever.” I get that. Morning brings back the heroic ages. I was just as moved by the faint buzz of a mosquito making its unseen journey through my room at the break of day, with the doors and windows open, as I would be by any trumpet that heralded fame. It was like Homer’s requiem; an Iliad and Odyssey in the air, expressing its own struggles and journeys. There was something universal about it; a lasting reminder, until it was banned, of the world's everlasting energy and fertility. Morning, the most memorable time of the day, is the hour of awakening. It's when we feel the least sleepy; for at least an hour, some part of us awakens that sleeps the rest of the day and night. Little can be expected from a day, if it can even be called a day, if we’re awakened not by our own spirit, but by the mechanical nudging of someone else. We should wake up with our inner strength and aspirations, accompanied by soft music instead of factory bells, and surrounded by a fragrance that lifts us to a higher life than the one we fell asleep from; thus, the darkness bears its fruit and proves just as good as the light. A person who doesn’t believe that each day holds an earlier, more sacred, and fresh hour than they have yet experienced has lost hope in life and is heading down a dark path. After a bit of a break from physical life, man's soul, or its abilities, gets revitalized each day, and his spirit tries once more to create something noble. I’d say all significant events happen in the morning and in a morning atmosphere. The Vedas say, “All intelligences awaken with the morning.” Poetry, art, and the most beautiful and memorable actions of humanity start from such a time. All poets and heroes, like Memnon, are children of the dawn, and they share their music at sunrise. For those whose enthusiastic and vibrant thoughts keep up with the sun, the day is like a never-ending morning. It doesn’t matter what the clocks say or how people act and work. Morning is when I am awake, and there’s a dawn within me. Moral reform is the effort to shake off sleep. Why is it that people have such a poor account of their day if they haven’t been dozing off? They aren’t poor thinkers. If they hadn’t been plagued by drowsiness, they would have achieved something. The millions are awake enough for physical work; but only one in a million is awake enough for effective intellectual effort, and only one in a hundred million for a poetic or divine life. To be awake is to be alive. I’ve never met a person who was completely awake. How could I have faced him?

We must learn to reawaken and keep ourselves awake, not by mechanical aids, but by an infinite expectation of the dawn, which does not forsake us in our soundest sleep. I know of no more encouraging fact than the unquestionable ability of man to elevate his life by a conscious endeavor. It is something to be able to paint a particular picture, or to carve a statue, and so to make a few objects beautiful; but it is far more glorious to carve and paint the very atmosphere and medium through which we look, which morally we can do. To affect the quality of the day, that is the highest of arts. Every man is tasked to make his life, even in its details, worthy of the contemplation of his most elevated and critical hour. If we refused, or rather used up, such paltry information as we get, the oracles would distinctly inform us how this might be done.

We need to learn to wake up and stay awake, not through mechanical means, but by having an endless hope for a new beginning that stays with us even in our deepest sleep. There’s nothing more uplifting than the undeniable ability of humans to improve their lives through intentional effort. It’s great to create a specific piece of art or sculpture and make a few things beautiful, but it's even more amazing to shape the very environment and mindset through which we view the world, which we can morally achieve. To influence the quality of our day is the highest form of artistry. Everyone is challenged to make their life, even in its smallest details, worthy of reflection during their most meaningful and critical moments. If we were to reject, or rather exhaust, the trivial knowledge we accumulate, the signs would clearly show us how to make this happen.

I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived. I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practise resignation, unless it was quite necessary. I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life, to cut a broad swath and shave close, to drive life into a corner, and reduce it to its lowest terms, and, if it proved to be mean, why then to get the whole and genuine meanness of it, and publish its meanness to the world; or if it were sublime, to know it by experience, and be able to give a true account of it in my next excursion. For most men, it appears to me, are in a strange uncertainty about it, whether it is of the devil or of God, and have somewhat hastily concluded that it is the chief end of man here to “glorify God and enjoy him forever.”

I went to the woods because I wanted to live intentionally, to face only the essential truths of life, and see if I could learn what it had to teach me, so that when I died, I wouldn’t find out that I hadn’t truly lived. I didn’t want to live a life that wasn't real; life is too precious for that. I also didn’t want to resign myself to anything unless it was absolutely necessary. I wanted to dive deep and extract all the richness of life, to live boldly and simply enough to push aside everything that wasn’t real life, to make a significant impact and focus closely, to challenge life and break it down to its essentials, and if it turned out to be trivial, then to fully acknowledge its triviality and expose it to the world; or if it was profound, to experience it fully and be able to share that truth on my next journey. It seems to me that most people are quite uncertain about it, whether it’s from the devil or from God, and have somewhat hastily concluded that the main purpose of life is to “glorify God and enjoy him forever.”

Still we live meanly, like ants; though the fable tells us that we were long ago changed into men; like pygmies we fight with cranes; it is error upon error, and clout upon clout, and our best virtue has for its occasion a superfluous and evitable wretchedness. Our life is frittered away by detail. An honest man has hardly need to count more than his ten fingers, or in extreme cases he may add his ten toes, and lump the rest. Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say, let your affairs be as two or three, and not a hundred or a thousand; instead of a million count half a dozen, and keep your accounts on your thumb nail. In the midst of this chopping sea of civilized life, such are the clouds and storms and quicksands and thousand-and-one items to be allowed for, that a man has to live, if he would not founder and go to the bottom and not make his port at all, by dead reckoning, and he must be a great calculator indeed who succeeds. Simplify, simplify. Instead of three meals a day, if it be necessary eat but one; instead of a hundred dishes, five; and reduce other things in proportion. Our life is like a German Confederacy, made up of petty states, with its boundary forever fluctuating, so that even a German cannot tell you how it is bounded at any moment. The nation itself, with all its so called internal improvements, which, by the way are all external and superficial, is just such an unwieldy and overgrown establishment, cluttered with furniture and tripped up by its own traps, ruined by luxury and heedless expense, by want of calculation and a worthy aim, as the million households in the land; and the only cure for it as for them is in a rigid economy, a stern and more than Spartan simplicity of life and elevation of purpose. It lives too fast. Men think that it is essential that the Nation have commerce, and export ice, and talk through a telegraph, and ride thirty miles an hour, without a doubt, whether they do or not; but whether we should live like baboons or like men, is a little uncertain. If we do not get out sleepers, and forge rails, and devote days and nights to the work, but go to tinkering upon our lives to improve them, who will build railroads? And if railroads are not built, how shall we get to heaven in season? But if we stay at home and mind our business, who will want railroads? We do not ride on the railroad; it rides upon us. Did you ever think what those sleepers are that underlie the railroad? Each one is a man, an Irish-man, or a Yankee man. The rails are laid on them, and they are covered with sand, and the cars run smoothly over them. They are sound sleepers, I assure you. And every few years a new lot is laid down and run over; so that, if some have the pleasure of riding on a rail, others have the misfortune to be ridden upon. And when they run over a man that is walking in his sleep, a supernumerary sleeper in the wrong position, and wake him up, they suddenly stop the cars, and make a hue and cry about it, as if this were an exception. I am glad to know that it takes a gang of men for every five miles to keep the sleepers down and level in their beds as it is, for this is a sign that they may sometime get up again.

Still we live simply, like ants; although the fable says we were turned into men long ago; like pygmies we fight with cranes; it’s error upon error, and mess upon mess, and our best virtue comes from unnecessary and avoidable misery. Our lives are wasted on details. An honest person barely needs to count more than on their ten fingers, or in extreme cases, they might add their ten toes and ignore the rest. Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say, keep your affairs to two or three, not a hundred or a thousand; instead of a million, count just half a dozen, and keep your accounts on your thumbnail. Amid this chaotic sea of civilized life, there are so many clouds, storms, quicksand, and countless items to consider, that a person has to navigate by rough estimates, and only a great calculator can manage to succeed. Simplify, simplify. Instead of three meals a day, if it’s necessary, eat just one; instead of a hundred dishes, five; and reduce other things proportionately. Our lives are like a German Confederacy, made up of small states, with boundaries that are constantly shifting, so that even a German cannot tell you how it’s defined at any moment. The nation itself, with all its so-called internal improvements, which, by the way, are all external and superficial, is just as unwieldy and overgrown, cluttered with furniture and tripped up by its own traps, ruined by luxury and careless spending, by lack of calculation and a worthy aim, just like the million households in the country; and the only solution for it, as for them, is a strict economy, a stern and more than Spartan simplicity of life and elevation of purpose. It lives too fast. People think it’s essential for the Nation to have commerce, to export ice, to communicate via telegraph, and to travel thirty miles an hour, whether they do or not; but whether we should live like baboons or like humans is a bit uncertain. If we don’t lay down sleepers, and forge rails, and spend days and nights on the task, but instead tinker with our lives to improve them, who will build railroads? And if railroads aren’t built, how will we get to heaven on time? But if we stay home and focus on our own business, who will need railroads? We don’t ride on the railroad; it rides on us. Have you ever considered what those sleepers are that support the railroad? Each one is a person, an Irishman or a Yankee. The rails are laid on them, and they’re covered with sand, and the cars run smoothly over them. They are sound sleepers, I assure you. And every few years, a new set is laid down and driven over; so, if some enjoy riding on a rail, others unfortunately are ridden upon. And when they run over a man who’s walking in his sleep, an extra sleeper in the wrong position, and wake him up, they suddenly stop the cars and make a fuss about it, as if it were an exception. I’m glad to know that it takes a crew of men for every five miles to keep the sleepers down and level in their beds as they are, for this is a sign that they might someday get up again.

Why should we live with such hurry and waste of life? We are determined to be starved before we are hungry. Men say that a stitch in time saves nine, and so they take a thousand stitches to-day to save nine to-morrow. As for work, we haven’t any of any consequence. We have the Saint Vitus’ dance, and cannot possibly keep our heads still. If I should only give a few pulls at the parish bell-rope, as for a fire, that is, without setting the bell, there is hardly a man on his farm in the outskirts of Concord, notwithstanding that press of engagements which was his excuse so many times this morning, nor a boy, nor a woman, I might almost say, but would forsake all and follow that sound, not mainly to save property from the flames, but, if we will confess the truth, much more to see it burn, since burn it must, and we, be it known, did not set it on fire,—or to see it put out, and have a hand in it, if that is done as handsomely; yes, even if it were the parish church itself. Hardly a man takes a half hour’s nap after dinner, but when he wakes he holds up his head and asks, “What’s the news?” as if the rest of mankind had stood his sentinels. Some give directions to be waked every half hour, doubtless for no other purpose; and then, to pay for it, they tell what they have dreamed. After a night’s sleep the news is as indispensable as the breakfast. “Pray tell me any thing new that has happened to a man any where on this globe,”—and he reads it over his coffee and rolls, that a man has had his eyes gouged out this morning on the Wachito River; never dreaming the while that he lives in the dark unfathomed mammoth cave of this world, and has but the rudiment of an eye himself.

Why should we rush through life and waste it? We’re determined to feel deprived before we’re even hungry. People say that fixing a problem promptly prevents more issues later, yet they spend all day dealing with a thousand problems to avoid just one tomorrow. As for work, we don’t really have any that matters. We’re like we're always jittery, unable to stay calm. If I were to pull the parish bell-rope a few times, as if there were a fire, without actually ringing the bell, almost every man on his farm in the outskirts of Concord, despite all the excuses he made this morning about being busy, and nearly every boy and woman too, would drop everything and rush toward that sound—not just to save property from burning, but, if we’re honest, more to watch it burn, since it will burn anyway, and we can’t say we set it on fire—or to help extinguish it, if that’s just as exciting; yes, even if it were the parish church itself. Barely anyone takes a quick nap after lunch, but when they wake up, they lift their heads and ask, “What’s the news?” as if the rest of humanity has been watching over them. Some even request to be woken up every half hour, likely for no other reason, and then they recount their dreams to justify it. After a night’s sleep, knowing the news feels as necessary as breakfast. “Please tell me anything new that’s happened anywhere on this planet,”—and he reads over his coffee and pastries that someone had their eyes gouged out this morning on the Wachito River; he never considers that he lives in a dark, unfathomable cave of this world and has only a vague understanding of his surroundings.

For my part, I could easily do without the post-office. I think that there are very few important communications made through it. To speak critically, I never received more than one or two letters in my life—I wrote this some years ago—that were worth the postage. The penny-post is, commonly, an institution through which you seriously offer a man that penny for his thoughts which is so often safely offered in jest. And I am sure that I never read any memorable news in a newspaper. If we read of one man robbed, or murdered, or killed by accident, or one house burned, or one vessel wrecked, or one steamboat blown up, or one cow run over on the Western Railroad, or one mad dog killed, or one lot of grasshoppers in the winter,—we never need read of another. One is enough. If you are acquainted with the principle, what do you care for a myriad instances and applications? To a philosopher all news, as it is called, is gossip, and they who edit and read it are old women over their tea. Yet not a few are greedy after this gossip. There was such a rush, as I hear, the other day at one of the offices to learn the foreign news by the last arrival, that several large squares of plate glass belonging to the establishment were broken by the pressure,—news which I seriously think a ready wit might write a twelve-month, or twelve years, beforehand with sufficient accuracy. As for Spain, for instance, if you know how to throw in Don Carlos and the Infanta, and Don Pedro and Seville and Granada, from time to time in the right proportions,—they may have changed the names a little since I saw the papers,—and serve up a bull-fight when other entertainments fail, it will be true to the letter, and give us as good an idea of the exact state or ruin of things in Spain as the most succinct and lucid reports under this head in the newspapers: and as for England, almost the last significant scrap of news from that quarter was the revolution of 1649; and if you have learned the history of her crops for an average year, you never need attend to that thing again, unless your speculations are of a merely pecuniary character. If one may judge who rarely looks into the newspapers, nothing new does ever happen in foreign parts, a French revolution not excepted.

For my part, I could easily live without the post office. I think very few important messages are sent through it. To be honest, I’ve only ever received one or two letters in my life that were worth the postage. The penny post is generally just a way to jokingly offer someone a penny for their thoughts. And I’m sure I've never read any memorable news in a newspaper. If we hear about one person being robbed, murdered, killed in an accident, or one house burned down, or one ship wrecked, or one steamboat explosion, or one cow getting hit on the Western Railroad, or one mad dog being killed, or one swarm of grasshoppers in the winter, we never need to read about another. One is enough. If you understand the principle, what’s the point of a thousand examples? For a philosopher, all so-called news is just gossip, and those who edit and read it are like old ladies chatting over tea. Yet, many people are eager for this gossip. I heard there was such a rush the other day at one of the offices for the foreign news from the latest arrival, that several large pieces of plate glass were broken from the crowd. This news, I truly believe, a quick thinker could write twelve months or even twelve years in advance with enough accuracy. Take Spain, for example; if you know how to include Don Carlos, the Infanta, Don Pedro, Seville, and Granada in the right amounts, they might have changed the names a bit since I last saw the papers—but serve up a bullfight when other entertainment fails, and it will be just as accurate, giving us as good an idea of the real state of things in Spain as the most concise reports in the newspapers. And as for England, the last significant bit of news from there was the revolution of 1649. If you know the history of her crops for a typical year, you never need to pay attention to it again unless your interests are purely financial. If you look at it from the perspective of someone who rarely checks the news, nothing new ever happens abroad, not even a French revolution.

What news! how much more important to know what that is which was never old! “Kieou-he-yu (great dignitary of the state of Wei) sent a man to Khoung-tseu to know his news. Khoung-tseu caused the messenger to be seated near him, and questioned him in these terms: What is your master doing? The messenger answered with respect: My master desires to diminish the number of his faults, but he cannot come to the end of them. The messenger being gone, the philosopher remarked: What a worthy messenger! What a worthy messenger!” The preacher, instead of vexing the ears of drowsy farmers on their day of rest at the end of the week,—for Sunday is the fit conclusion of an ill-spent week, and not the fresh and brave beginning of a new one,—with this one other draggle-tail of a sermon, should shout with thundering voice, “Pause! Avast! Why so seeming fast, but deadly slow?”

What news! It’s so much more crucial to understand what has never changed! “Kieou-he-yu (the high official of the state of Wei) sent a person to Khoung-tseu to find out how he’s doing. Khoung-tseu had the messenger sit near him and asked him this: What is your master up to? The messenger respectfully replied: My master wants to reduce his faults, but he can’t seem to get to the end of them. After the messenger left, the philosopher said: What a worthy messenger! What a worthy messenger!” The preacher, instead of annoying the ears of sleepy farmers on their day of rest at the end of the week—since Sunday is the fitting conclusion of a poorly spent week, rather than a fresh start to a new one—should shout with a booming voice, “Stop! Hold on! Why do you seem to be moving fast, but are really going so slowly?”

Shams and delusions are esteemed for soundest truths, while reality is fabulous. If men would steadily observe realities only, and not allow themselves to be deluded, life, to compare it with such things as we know, would be like a fairy tale and the Arabian Nights’ Entertainments. If we respected only what is inevitable and has a right to be, music and poetry would resound along the streets. When we are unhurried and wise, we perceive that only great and worthy things have any permanent and absolute existence,—that petty fears and petty pleasures are but the shadow of the reality. This is always exhilarating and sublime. By closing the eyes and slumbering, and consenting to be deceived by shows, men establish and confirm their daily life of routine and habit everywhere, which still is built on purely illusory foundations. Children, who play life, discern its true law and relations more clearly than men, who fail to live it worthily, but who think that they are wiser by experience, that is, by failure. I have read in a Hindoo book, that “there was a king’s son, who, being expelled in infancy from his native city, was brought up by a forester, and, growing up to maturity in that state, imagined himself to belong to the barbarous race with which he lived. One of his father’s ministers having discovered him, revealed to him what he was, and the misconception of his character was removed, and he knew himself to be a prince. So soul,” continues the Hindoo philosopher, “from the circumstances in which it is placed, mistakes its own character, until the truth is revealed to it by some holy teacher, and then it knows itself to be Brahme.” I perceive that we inhabitants of New England live this mean life that we do because our vision does not penetrate the surface of things. We think that that is which appears to be. If a man should walk through this town and see only the reality, where, think you, would the “Mill-dam” go to? If he should give us an account of the realities he beheld there, we should not recognize the place in his description. Look at a meeting-house, or a court-house, or a jail, or a shop, or a dwelling-house, and say what that thing really is before a true gaze, and they would all go to pieces in your account of them. Men esteem truth remote, in the outskirts of the system, behind the farthest star, before Adam and after the last man. In eternity there is indeed something true and sublime. But all these times and places and occasions are now and here. God himself culminates in the present moment, and will never be more divine in the lapse of all the ages. And we are enabled to apprehend at all what is sublime and noble only by the perpetual instilling and drenching of the reality that surrounds us. The universe constantly and obediently answers to our conceptions; whether we travel fast or slow, the track is laid for us. Let us spend our lives in conceiving then. The poet or the artist never yet had so fair and noble a design but some of his posterity at least could accomplish it.

Shams and delusions are valued as the most solid truths, while reality seems incredible. If people focused solely on reality and didn't allow themselves to be fooled, life would feel like a fairy tale or something from the Arabian Nights. If we only honored what is unavoidable and rightful, music and poetry would fill the streets. When we are calm and wise, we see that only great and valuable things have any lasting and absolute existence—that small fears and small pleasures are just shadows of the truth. This awareness is always uplifting and profound. By closing our eyes and dozing off, allowing ourselves to be tricked by appearances, people build their daily routine and habits on purely deceptive foundations. Children, who play at life, understand its true laws and relationships more clearly than adults, who fail to live meaningfully but believe they're wiser through their experiences, which are really just failures. I read in a Hindu text that “there was a king’s son who, after being exiled as a baby from his hometown, was raised by a forester. Growing up in that environment, he thought he belonged to the wild tribe with which he lived. One of his father's ministers found him and revealed his true identity, clearing up the misunderstanding, and he recognized himself as a prince. Thus, the philosopher says, the soul, shaped by its surroundings, misinterprets its own nature until the truth is revealed by a wise teacher, and then it realizes it is Brahme.” I see that we, the people of New England, live this ordinary life because we fail to look beyond the surface of things. We believe that what seems is what is. If someone were to walk through this town and only see the reality, where would the “Mill-dam” end up? If he described the realities he saw, we wouldn’t recognize our own town from his account. Look at a church, a courthouse, a jail, a store, or a home, and try to say what those things truly are under a genuine gaze, and they would all fall apart in your description. People see truth as distant, far beyond the edges of the universe, behind the farthest star, before Adam and after the last human. In eternity, there is indeed something true and grand. But all these times and places are right now and right here. God reaches His peak in the present moment, and He won’t be any more divine as time goes on. We can only grasp what is sublime and noble through the constant immersion in the reality around us. The universe continually and obediently responds to our thoughts; whether we move fast or slow, the path is laid out for us. So let’s spend our lives envisioning. The poet or the artist has never had such a noble and beautiful idea that at least some of their descendants couldn't achieve it.

Let us spend one day as deliberately as Nature, and not be thrown off the track by every nutshell and mosquito’s wing that falls on the rails. Let us rise early and fast, or break fast, gently and without perturbation; let company come and let company go, let the bells ring and the children cry,—determined to make a day of it. Why should we knock under and go with the stream? Let us not be upset and overwhelmed in that terrible rapid and whirlpool called a dinner, situated in the meridian shallows. Weather this danger and you are safe, for the rest of the way is down hill. With unrelaxed nerves, with morning vigor, sail by it, looking another way, tied to the mast like Ulysses. If the engine whistles, let it whistle till it is hoarse for its pains. If the bell rings, why should we run? We will consider what kind of music they are like. Let us settle ourselves, and work and wedge our feet downward through the mud and slush of opinion, and prejudice, and tradition, and delusion, and appearance, that alluvion which covers the globe, through Paris and London, through New York and Boston and Concord, through church and state, through poetry and philosophy and religion, till we come to a hard bottom and rocks in place, which we can call reality, and say, This is, and no mistake; and then begin, having a point d’appui, below freshet and frost and fire, a place where you might found a wall or a state, or set a lamp-post safely, or perhaps a gauge, not a Nilometer, but a Realometer, that future ages might know how deep a freshet of shams and appearances had gathered from time to time. If you stand right fronting and face to face to a fact, you will see the sun glimmer on both its surfaces, as if it were a cimeter, and feel its sweet edge dividing you through the heart and marrow, and so you will happily conclude your mortal career. Be it life or death, we crave only reality. If we are really dying, let us hear the rattle in our throats and feel cold in the extremities; if we are alive, let us go about our business.

Let's spend a day as intentionally as Nature does, and not get sidetracked by every little distraction that comes our way. Let's wake up early and either skip breakfast or take it at a leisurely pace; let people come and go, let the bells ring and the kids cry—committed to making the most of the day. Why should we give in and just go with the flow? Let’s not get thrown off by that chaotic rush called dinner, which is just a shallow pit of distraction. Overcome this challenge and you're free, because the rest will be easy. With steady nerves and morning energy, let’s sail past it, looking away, like Ulysses tied to the mast. If the train whistles, let it whistle until it’s worn out. If the bell rings, why should we rush? Let’s think about what kind of music it resembles. Let’s settle in, and push our way through the mud and muck of opinions, prejudices, traditions, delusions, and appearances that blanket the world—from Paris and London to New York, Boston, and Concord, through both church and state, poetry, philosophy, and religion—until we hit solid ground and real facts that we can confidently recognize as reality and say, “This is true, no doubt about it.” Then we can start, having a solid base beneath the floods, frost, and flames, a place where we could build a wall, establish a state, or securely set a lamp post, or even a gauge—not a Nilometer, but a Realometer—so that future generations can understand just how deep the floods of falsehoods and appearances have piled up over time. If you stand facing a fact directly, you'll see the sun reflect on both sides of it, like a curved sword, and feel its sharp edge cut through you, and that’s how you’ll conclude your life happily. Whether it’s life or death, we only want reality. If we are truly dying, let’s hear the rattle in our throats and feel the chill in our limbs; if we’re alive, let’s go about our business.

Time is but the stream I go a-fishing in. I drink at it; but while I drink I see the sandy bottom and detect how shallow it is. Its thin current slides away, but eternity remains. I would drink deeper; fish in the sky, whose bottom is pebbly with stars. I cannot count one. I know not the first letter of the alphabet. I have always been regretting that I was not as wise as the day I was born. The intellect is a cleaver; it discerns and rifts its way into the secret of things. I do not wish to be any more busy with my hands than is necessary. My head is hands and feet. I feel all my best faculties concentrated in it. My instinct tells me that my head is an organ for burrowing, as some creatures use their snout and fore-paws, and with it I would mine and burrow my way through these hills. I think that the richest vein is somewhere hereabouts; so by the divining-rod and thin rising vapors I judge; and here I will begin to mine.

Time is like a stream I’m fishing in. I take a sip from it, but while I do, I notice the sandy bottom and how shallow it is. The light current slips away, but eternity stays. I wish I could drink more deeply; fish in the sky, which is bottomed with stars. I can’t count even one. I don’t know the first letter of the alphabet. I've always felt regret that I wasn’t as wise as the day I was born. The mind is a tool; it cuts through and uncovers the secrets of things. I don’t want to be more hands-on than necessary. My mind is my hands and feet. I feel all my best abilities are focused there. My instinct tells me that my mind is made for digging, like some animals use their snouts and front paws, and with it, I would tunnel my way through these hills. I believe the richest treasure is somewhere around here; that’s what the divining rod and faint rising vapors suggest; and here is where I will start to dig.

Reading

With a little more deliberation in the choice of their pursuits, all men would perhaps become essentially students and observers, for certainly their nature and destiny are interesting to all alike. In accumulating property for ourselves or our posterity, in founding a family or a state, or acquiring fame even, we are mortal; but in dealing with truth we are immortal, and need fear no change nor accident. The oldest Egyptian or Hindoo philosopher raised a corner of the veil from the statue of the divinity; and still the trembling robe remains raised, and I gaze upon as fresh a glory as he did, since it was I in him that was then so bold, and it is he in me that now reviews the vision. No dust has settled on that robe; no time has elapsed since that divinity was revealed. That time which we really improve, or which is improvable, is neither past, present, nor future.

If people were a bit more thoughtful about what they pursue, everyone might end up being more like students and observers because our nature and purpose are interesting to us all. When we gather wealth for ourselves or our future generations, start a family or a community, or seek fame, we are only mortal; but when we engage with truth, we become timeless and have nothing to fear from change or chance. The ancient Egyptian or Indian philosopher lifted a corner of the veil from the statue of the divine, and that trembling garment still hangs open now, revealing a glory just as vivid as it was back then, since I was him when he was so brave, and he is in me as I reflect on that vision now. No dust has settled on that garment; no time has passed since the divine was unveiled. The time that we genuinely make use of, or that can be improved, is not confined to past, present, or future.

My residence was more favorable, not only to thought, but to serious reading, than a university; and though I was beyond the range of the ordinary circulating library, I had more than ever come within the influence of those books which circulate round the world, whose sentences were first written on bark, and are now merely copied from time to time on to linen paper. Says the poet Mîr Camar Uddîn Mast, “Being seated to run through the region of the spiritual world; I have had this advantage in books. To be intoxicated by a single glass of wine; I have experienced this pleasure when I have drunk the liquor of the esoteric doctrines.” I kept Homer’s Iliad on my table through the summer, though I looked at his page only now and then. Incessant labor with my hands, at first, for I had my house to finish and my beans to hoe at the same time, made more study impossible. Yet I sustained myself by the prospect of such reading in future. I read one or two shallow books of travel in the intervals of my work, till that employment made me ashamed of myself, and I asked where it was then that I lived.

My living situation was better for thinking and serious reading than a university; and even though I was outside the reach of the typical lending library, I found myself more influenced by those books that travel worldwide, whose words were first etched onto bark and are now occasionally copied onto linen paper. The poet Mîr Camar Uddîn Mast says, “While sitting to explore the spiritual realm, I have gained this advantage from books. I have felt the intoxication of a single glass of wine; I have experienced this joy when I have absorbed the essence of esoteric teachings.” I kept Homer’s Iliad on my table throughout the summer, even though I only glanced at its pages now and then. Constant labor with my hands initially made further study impossible, as I had to finish my house and tend to my bean plants simultaneously. Still, I motivated myself with the thought of future reading. I read one or two light travel books in the moments between my work until that work made me feel ashamed, prompting me to question where it was that I really lived.

The student may read Homer or Æschylus in the Greek without danger of dissipation or luxuriousness, for it implies that he in some measure emulate their heroes, and consecrate morning hours to their pages. The heroic books, even if printed in the character of our mother tongue, will always be in a language dead to degenerate times; and we must laboriously seek the meaning of each word and line, conjecturing a larger sense than common use permits out of what wisdom and valor and generosity we have. The modern cheap and fertile press, with all its translations, has done little to bring us nearer to the heroic writers of antiquity. They seem as solitary, and the letter in which they are printed as rare and curious, as ever. It is worth the expense of youthful days and costly hours, if you learn only some words of an ancient language, which are raised out of the trivialness of the street, to be perpetual suggestions and provocations. It is not in vain that the farmer remembers and repeats the few Latin words which he has heard. Men sometimes speak as if the study of the classics would at length make way for more modern and practical studies; but the adventurous student will always study classics, in whatever language they may be written and however ancient they may be. For what are the classics but the noblest recorded thoughts of man? They are the only oracles which are not decayed, and there are such answers to the most modern inquiry in them as Delphi and Dodona never gave. We might as well omit to study Nature because she is old. To read well, that is, to read true books in a true spirit, is a noble exercise, and one that will task the reader more than any exercise which the customs of the day esteem. It requires a training such as the athletes underwent, the steady intention almost of the whole life to this object. Books must be read as deliberately and reservedly as they were written. It is not enough even to be able to speak the language of that nation by which they are written, for there is a memorable interval between the spoken and the written language, the language heard and the language read. The one is commonly transitory, a sound, a tongue, a dialect merely, almost brutish, and we learn it unconsciously, like the brutes, of our mothers. The other is the maturity and experience of that; if that is our mother tongue, this is our father tongue, a reserved and select expression, too significant to be heard by the ear, which we must be born again in order to speak. The crowds of men who merely spoke the Greek and Latin tongues in the middle ages were not entitled by the accident of birth to read the works of genius written in those languages; for these were not written in that Greek or Latin which they knew, but in the select language of literature. They had not learned the nobler dialects of Greece and Rome, but the very materials on which they were written were waste paper to them, and they prized instead a cheap contemporary literature. But when the several nations of Europe had acquired distinct though rude written languages of their own, sufficient for the purposes of their rising literatures, then first learning revived, and scholars were enabled to discern from that remoteness the treasures of antiquity. What the Roman and Grecian multitude could not hear, after the lapse of ages a few scholars read, and a few scholars only are still reading it.

The student can read Homer or Aeschylus in Greek without risk of distraction or indulgence because it suggests he should try to embody their heroes and dedicate his mornings to their works. The legendary texts, even when translated into our native tongue, will always feel like a language from a past era; we will have to painstakingly uncover the meaning of each word and line, imagining a deeper significance than everyday usage allows based on the wisdom, courage, and generosity we possess. The modern, inexpensive printing press, with all its translations, has done little to connect us with the heroic authors of ancient times. They still feel distant, and the format of their writing remains rare and interesting. It's worth spending youthful days and precious hours to learn even a few words from an ancient language, as these words can elevate us above the mundane. It's not in vain that farmers remember and recite the few Latin words they’ve heard. Some claim that studying the classics would eventually pave the way for more modern and practical subjects, but any dedicated student will always pursue classics, no matter the language they're in or how ancient they are. After all, the classics are the finest recorded thoughts of humanity. They are the only surviving oracles, providing insights into modern questions that Delphi and Dodona never could. We might as well skip studying Nature because she's old. To read well, meaning to engage with true books in an authentic way, is a noble endeavor and challenges the reader more than any contemporary activity valued by society. It demands a commitment similar to that of athletes, focusing most of one’s life on this goal. Books should be read as carefully and thoughtfully as they were written. It's not enough to simply speak the language in which they were written; there's a significant gap between spoken and written language, between what we hear and what we read. The spoken word is often fleeting—a sound, a dialect, almost animalistic—and we acquire it unconsciously from our mothers. The written word conveys the maturity and wisdom of that speech; if spoken language is our mother tongue, then written language is our father tongue—a refined and select form of expression too powerful to be merely listened to, one that requires a rebirth to master. The many people who only spoke Greek and Latin in the Middle Ages were not entitled by their birthright to read the genius of texts in those languages, for those texts weren't composed in the Greek or Latin they knew, but in the elite language of literature. They hadn’t learned the superior dialects of Greece and Rome; the very materials of those texts were meaningless to them, as they preferred the abundant contemporary literature. But when various European nations developed their own distinct, albeit rough, written languages suitable for their emerging literatures, the study of ancient texts was revived, allowing scholars to access the treasures of the past from that distance. What the masses of Roman and Greek speakers couldn’t hear, a few scholars were eventually able to read, and only a few scholars are still reading it today.

However much we may admire the orator’s occasional bursts of eloquence, the noblest written words are commonly as far behind or above the fleeting spoken language as the firmament with its stars is behind the clouds. There are the stars, and they who can may read them. The astronomers forever comment on and observe them. They are not exhalations like our daily colloquies and vaporous breath. What is called eloquence in the forum is commonly found to be rhetoric in the study. The orator yields to the inspiration of a transient occasion, and speaks to the mob before him, to those who can hear him; but the writer, whose more equable life is his occasion, and who would be distracted by the event and the crowd which inspire the orator, speaks to the intellect and health of mankind, to all in any age who can understand him.

No matter how much we might appreciate an orator's occasional bursts of eloquence, the finest written words are often as far removed from spoken language as the stars are from the clouds. There are the stars, and those who can, will read them. Astronomers constantly observe and comment on them. They’re not just fleeting thoughts like our daily conversations and idle chatter. What’s considered eloquence in a speech is often just rhetoric in writing. The orator gets inspired by a moment and speaks to the crowd in front of him, to those who can hear him; but the writer, whose more stable life serves as his inspiration, and who would be distracted by the events and the crowd that motivate the orator, speaks to the intellect and well-being of humanity, to all who can understand him in any time.

No wonder that Alexander carried the Iliad with him on his expeditions in a precious casket. A written word is the choicest of relics. It is something at once more intimate with us and more universal than any other work of art. It is the work of art nearest to life itself. It may be translated into every language, and not only be read but actually breathed from all human lips;—not be represented on canvas or in marble only, but be carved out of the breath of life itself. The symbol of an ancient man’s thought becomes a modern man’s speech. Two thousand summers have imparted to the monuments of Grecian literature, as to her marbles, only a maturer golden and autumnal tint, for they have carried their own serene and celestial atmosphere into all lands to protect them against the corrosion of time. Books are the treasured wealth of the world and the fit inheritance of generations and nations. Books, the oldest and the best, stand naturally and rightfully on the shelves of every cottage. They have no cause of their own to plead, but while they enlighten and sustain the reader his common sense will not refuse them. Their authors are a natural and irresistible aristocracy in every society, and, more than kings or emperors, exert an influence on mankind. When the illiterate and perhaps scornful trader has earned by enterprise and industry his coveted leisure and independence, and is admitted to the circles of wealth and fashion, he turns inevitably at last to those still higher but yet inaccessible circles of intellect and genius, and is sensible only of the imperfection of his culture and the vanity and insufficiency of all his riches, and further proves his good sense by the pains which he takes to secure for his children that intellectual culture whose want he so keenly feels; and thus it is that he becomes the founder of a family.

No wonder Alexander took the Iliad with him on his journeys in a precious box. A written word is the most valuable of treasures. It’s something that’s both more personal to us and more universal than any other form of art. It’s the form of art closest to life itself. It can be translated into every language, and not only can it be read, but it can also be expressed by all human voices; it can’t just be depicted on canvas or in marble, but can be breathed into existence from the breath of life itself. The thoughts of an ancient person become the speech of a modern person. Two thousand summers have given Greek literature and her sculptures a richer golden and autumnal hue, bringing a calm and celestial atmosphere into all lands to shield them from the effects of time. Books are the cherished wealth of the world and a fitting inheritance for generations and nations. The oldest and best books rightfully belong on the shelves of every home. They don’t need to defend themselves, but while they enlighten and support the reader, their common sense will not dismiss them. Their authors form a natural and compelling aristocracy in every society, and more than kings or emperors, they have a profound influence on humanity. When an uneducated and maybe scornful trader has earned his much-desired leisure and independence through hard work, and is accepted into wealthy and fashionable circles, he inevitably turns at last to those even higher but still unattainable circles of intellect and genius, realizing only the flaws in his education and the superficiality and inadequacy of all his wealth. He further demonstrates his good sense by trying hard to provide for his children the intellectual culture he feels he lacks; thus, he becomes the founder of a family.

Those who have not learned to read the ancient classics in the language in which they were written must have a very imperfect knowledge of the history of the human race; for it is remarkable that no transcript of them has ever been made into any modern tongue, unless our civilization itself may be regarded as such a transcript. Homer has never yet been printed in English, nor Æschylus, nor Virgil even—works as refined, as solidly done, and as beautiful almost as the morning itself; for later writers, say what we will of their genius, have rarely, if ever, equalled the elaborate beauty and finish and the lifelong and heroic literary labors of the ancients. They only talk of forgetting them who never knew them. It will be soon enough to forget them when we have the learning and the genius which will enable us to attend to and appreciate them. That age will be rich indeed when those relics which we call Classics, and the still older and more than classic but even less known Scriptures of the nations, shall have still further accumulated, when the Vaticans shall be filled with Vedas and Zendavestas and Bibles, with Homers and Dantes and Shakespeares, and all the centuries to come shall have successively deposited their trophies in the forum of the world. By such a pile we may hope to scale heaven at last.

Those who haven't learned to read the ancient classics in the original language have a pretty limited understanding of human history. It's striking that no complete translations exist in any modern language, unless we consider our civilization itself as one. Homer has never been published in English, nor have Aeschylus or Virgil—works that are as polished, well-crafted, and beautiful as a morning sunrise. Later writers, no matter how talented, have rarely matched the intricate beauty and dedication of ancient authors. It's easy to forget those we never truly knew. We’ll only forget them when we possess the knowledge and talent to appreciate them fully. The future will be prosperous when those treasures we call Classics, along with older yet less recognized Scriptures from various cultures, have accumulated even more. Imagine the Vaticans filled with Vedas, Zendavestas, Bibles, Homers, Dantes, Shakespeares, and the many centuries ahead contributing their masterpieces to the world stage. Through such a collection, we might finally hope to reach the heavens.

The works of the great poets have never yet been read by mankind, for only great poets can read them. They have only been read as the multitude read the stars, at most astrologically, not astronomically. Most men have learned to read to serve a paltry convenience, as they have learned to cipher in order to keep accounts and not be cheated in trade; but of reading as a noble intellectual exercise they know little or nothing; yet this only is reading, in a high sense, not that which lulls us as a luxury and suffers the nobler faculties to sleep the while, but what we have to stand on tip-toe to read and devote our most alert and wakeful hours to.

The works of great poets have never truly been understood by people, because only great poets can grasp them. They've only been read in the same way people look at the stars—mostly from an astrological perspective rather than an astronomical one. Most people have learned to read just to meet basic needs, like learning math to handle their finances and avoid being cheated in business; but they know little to nothing about reading as a valuable intellectual pursuit. Yet, this is the only true form of reading, in a meaningful way—not the kind that relaxes us as a luxury while letting our deeper thinking go to sleep, but the kind that makes us stretch to comprehend and demands our fullest attention and alertness.

I think that having learned our letters we should read the best that is in literature, and not be forever repeating our a b abs, and words of one syllable, in the fourth or fifth classes, sitting on the lowest and foremost form all our lives. Most men are satisfied if they read or hear read, and perchance have been convicted by the wisdom of one good book, the Bible, and for the rest of their lives vegetate and dissipate their faculties in what is called easy reading. There is a work in several volumes in our Circulating Library entitled Little Reading, which I thought referred to a town of that name which I had not been to. There are those who, like cormorants and ostriches, can digest all sorts of this, even after the fullest dinner of meats and vegetables, for they suffer nothing to be wasted. If others are the machines to provide this provender, they are the machines to read it. They read the nine thousandth tale about Zebulon and Sephronia, and how they loved as none had ever loved before, and neither did the course of their true love run smooth,—at any rate, how it did run and stumble, and get up again and go on! how some poor unfortunate got up on to a steeple, who had better never have gone up as far as the belfry; and then, having needlessly got him up there, the happy novelist rings the bell for all the world to come together and hear, O dear! how he did get down again! For my part, I think that they had better metamorphose all such aspiring heroes of universal noveldom into man weathercocks, as they used to put heroes among the constellations, and let them swing round there till they are rusty, and not come down at all to bother honest men with their pranks. The next time the novelist rings the bell I will not stir though the meeting-house burn down. “The Skip of the Tip-Toe-Hop, a Romance of the Middle Ages, by the celebrated author of ‘Tittle-Tol-Tan,’ to appear in monthly parts; a great rush; don’t all come together.” All this they read with saucer eyes, and erect and primitive curiosity, and with unwearied gizzard, whose corrugations even yet need no sharpening, just as some little four-year-old bencher his two-cent gilt-covered edition of Cinderella,—without any improvement, that I can see, in the pronunciation, or accent, or emphasis, or any more skill in extracting or inserting the moral. The result is dulness of sight, a stagnation of the vital circulations, and a general deliquium and sloughing off of all the intellectual faculties. This sort of gingerbread is baked daily and more sedulously than pure wheat or rye-and-Indian in almost every oven, and finds a surer market.

I believe that once we’ve learned the alphabet, we should read the best literature available and not just keep repeating our ABCs and simple words in the lower grades, stuck in the same spot forever. Most people are content to read or listen to one good book, like the Bible, and then spend the rest of their lives mindlessly reading what’s considered "easy." There’s a multi-volume book in our library called Little Reading, which I initially thought was about a town I hadn’t visited. Some people, like cormorants and ostriches, can swallow any kind of reading material, even after indulging in a hefty meal, wasting nothing. If some are the ones feeding this content, they’re also the ones consuming it. They sift through countless stories about Zebulon and Sephronia's undying love, no matter how rocky their journey is—oh, how it stumblingly moved forward, tripped, fell, and got back up! There’s always a character who foolishly climbs a steeple, regretting the decision long before reaching the bell tower; and once stuck up there, the delighted novelist signals everyone to gather and hear, “Oh dear! How did he come down?” Personally, I think it’s better to turn those ambitious characters into whimsical weather vanes, like how heroes used to be placed among the stars, and let them spin until they rust, avoiding bothering honest folks with their antics. The next time the novelist rings the bell, I won’t budge even if the church is on fire. “The Skip of the Tip-Toe-Hop, a Romance of the Middle Ages, by the famous author of ‘Tittle-Tol-Tan,’ coming out in monthly installments; it’s a hit; don’t all rush at once.” They read this with wide eyes and childlike curiosity, with endless appetite for more, just like a four-year-old poring over their two-dollar, shiny edition of Cinderella—without any noticeable improvement in pronunciation, accent, emphasis, or understanding of the moral. The result is a dullness of perception, stagnation of one’s energy, and a general decline of intellectual ability. This kind of mindless fluff is produced more frequently and diligently than real literature in nearly every bakery, and it finds a more reliable audience.

The best books are not read even by those who are called good readers. What does our Concord culture amount to? There is in this town, with a very few exceptions, no taste for the best or for very good books even in English literature, whose words all can read and spell. Even the college-bred and so called liberally educated men here and elsewhere have really little or no acquaintance with the English classics; and as for the recorded wisdom of mankind, the ancient classics and Bibles, which are accessible to all who will know of them, there are the feeblest efforts any where made to become acquainted with them. I know a woodchopper, of middle age, who takes a French paper, not for news as he says, for he is above that, but to “keep himself in practice,” he being a Canadian by birth; and when I ask him what he considers the best thing he can do in this world, he says, beside this, to keep up and add to his English. This is about as much as the college bred generally do or aspire to do, and they take an English paper for the purpose. One who has just come from reading perhaps one of the best English books will find how many with whom he can converse about it? Or suppose he comes from reading a Greek or Latin classic in the original, whose praises are familiar even to the so called illiterate; he will find nobody at all to speak to, but must keep silence about it. Indeed, there is hardly the professor in our colleges, who, if he has mastered the difficulties of the language, has proportionally mastered the difficulties of the wit and poetry of a Greek poet, and has any sympathy to impart to the alert and heroic reader; and as for the sacred Scriptures, or Bibles of mankind, who in this town can tell me even their titles? Most men do not know that any nation but the Hebrews have had a scripture. A man, any man, will go considerably out of his way to pick up a silver dollar; but here are golden words, which the wisest men of antiquity have uttered, and whose worth the wise of every succeeding age have assured us of;—and yet we learn to read only as far as Easy Reading, the primers and class-books, and when we leave school, the “Little Reading,” and story books, which are for boys and beginners; and our reading, our conversation and thinking, are all on a very low level, worthy only of pygmies and manikins.

The best books aren’t even read by those who are labeled as good readers. What does our culture in Concord amount to? In this town, with very few exceptions, there’s no appreciation for the best or even very good books, even in English literature, which everyone can read and spell. Even college-educated and supposedly well-rounded individuals here and elsewhere are really quite unfamiliar with English classics; and when it comes to the documented wisdom of humanity, the ancient classics and Bibles, which are available to anyone interested, there are only the weakest attempts made to get to know them. I know a middle-aged woodchopper who reads a French newspaper, not for the news—he claims he's above that—but to “keep himself in practice,” since he's Canadian by birth; and when I ask him what he thinks is the best thing to do in this world, he says, besides that, it's to maintain and improve his English. This is about as much as college graduates generally do or hope to do, and they read an English paper for that purpose. Someone who just finished reading perhaps one of the best English books will find how many people he can talk to about it. Or if he comes from reading a Greek or Latin classic in the original, one whose praises are well-known even to the so-called uneducated; he will find no one to talk to at all and must stay silent about it. In fact, there's hardly a professor in our colleges who, if he has mastered the language’s challenges, has also proportionally mastered the complexities of the wit and poetry of a Greek poet and has any insights to share with an eager and passionate reader; and regarding the sacred Scriptures or the Bibles of humanity, who in this town can even tell me their titles? Most people don’t know that any nation besides the Hebrews has had a scripture. A man, any man, will go well out of his way to pick up a silver dollar; but here are golden words that the wisest people of ancient times have spoken, and whose value the wise of every age have confirmed;—and yet we only learn to read as far as easy materials, the primers and textbooks, and when we leave school, it’s the “Little Reading,” and storybooks for boys and beginners; and our reading, conversation, and thinking are all at a very low level, suitable only for pygmies and caricatures.

I aspire to be acquainted with wiser men than this our Concord soil has produced, whose names are hardly known here. Or shall I hear the name of Plato and never read his book? As if Plato were my townsman and I never saw him,—my next neighbor and I never heard him speak or attended to the wisdom of his words. But how actually is it? His Dialogues, which contain what was immortal in him, lie on the next shelf, and yet I never read them. We are underbred and low-lived and illiterate; and in this respect I confess I do not make any very broad distinction between the illiterateness of my townsman who cannot read at all, and the illiterateness of him who has learned to read only what is for children and feeble intellects. We should be as good as the worthies of antiquity, but partly by first knowing how good they were. We are a race of tit-men, and soar but little higher in our intellectual flights than the columns of the daily paper.

I want to connect with smarter people than those from our Concord area, whose names are hardly recognized here. Am I really going to hear the name Plato and never read his works? It's like Plato lives next door, and yet I’ve never met him—he’s right next door, but I’ve never listened to his wisdom. But what’s the reality? His Dialogues, which hold what was timeless in him, are just on the next shelf, and I still haven’t picked them up. We’re unrefined, small-minded, and uneducated; in this sense, I don’t see much of a difference between the ignorance of someone in my town who can’t read at all and someone who only reads material suited for children and those with limited understanding. We should aspire to be as great as the heroes of the past, but we first need to recognize how great they really were. We’re like a bunch of small birds, barely flying higher than the headlines in today’s paper.

It is not all books that are as dull as their readers. There are probably words addressed to our condition exactly, which, if we could really hear and understand, would be more salutary than the morning or the spring to our lives, and possibly put a new aspect on the face of things for us. How many a man has dated a new era in his life from the reading of a book. The book exists for us perchance which will explain our miracles and reveal new ones. The at present unutterable things we may find somewhere uttered. These same questions that disturb and puzzle and confound us have in their turn occurred to all the wise men; not one has been omitted; and each has answered them, according to his ability, by his words and his life. Moreover, with wisdom we shall learn liberality. The solitary hired man on a farm in the outskirts of Concord, who has had his second birth and peculiar religious experience, and is driven as he believes into the silent gravity and exclusiveness by his faith, may think it is not true; but Zoroaster, thousands of years ago, travelled the same road and had the same experience; but he, being wise, knew it to be universal, and treated his neighbors accordingly, and is even said to have invented and established worship among men. Let him humbly commune with Zoroaster then, and through the liberalizing influence of all the worthies, with Jesus Christ himself, and let “our church” go by the board.

Not all books are as boring as their readers. There are likely words that speak directly to our situation, which, if we could truly hear and understand them, would be more refreshing than the morning or spring in our lives and could change our perspective on everything. Many people have started a new chapter in their lives after reading a book. There might be a book out there that explains our miracles and reveals new ones. The things we can’t express right now might be articulated somewhere else. The same questions that trouble and confuse us have been pondered by all the wise men; not one has been left out, and each has answered them to the best of his ability, through his words and actions. Furthermore, with wisdom comes generosity. The lone farmhand on the outskirts of Concord, who feels like he’s had a spiritual awakening and believes he’s been led into a serious and exclusive path by his faith, might think that’s not true; but Zoroaster, thousands of years ago, walked the same path and had the same experience; he was wise enough to know it was universal and treated his neighbors accordingly, and it’s even said he created worship among people. So, let him humbly connect with Zoroaster, and through the liberating influence of all the great figures, even with Jesus Christ himself, and let’s put “our church” aside.

We boast that we belong to the nineteenth century and are making the most rapid strides of any nation. But consider how little this village does for its own culture. I do not wish to flatter my townsmen, nor to be flattered by them, for that will not advance either of us. We need to be provoked,—goaded like oxen, as we are, into a trot. We have a comparatively decent system of common schools, schools for infants only; but excepting the half-starved Lyceum in the winter, and latterly the puny beginning of a library suggested by the state, no school for ourselves. We spend more on almost any article of bodily aliment or ailment than on our mental aliment. It is time that we had uncommon schools, that we did not leave off our education when we begin to be men and women. It is time that villages were universities, and their elder inhabitants the fellows of universities, with leisure—if they are indeed so well off—to pursue liberal studies the rest of their lives. Shall the world be confined to one Paris or one Oxford forever? Cannot students be boarded here and get a liberal education under the skies of Concord? Can we not hire some Abelard to lecture to us? Alas! what with foddering the cattle and tending the store, we are kept from school too long, and our education is sadly neglected. In this country, the village should in some respects take the place of the nobleman of Europe. It should be the patron of the fine arts. It is rich enough. It wants only the magnanimity and refinement. It can spend money enough on such things as farmers and traders value, but it is thought Utopian to propose spending money for things which more intelligent men know to be of far more worth. This town has spent seventeen thousand dollars on a town-house, thank fortune or politics, but probably it will not spend so much on living wit, the true meat to put into that shell, in a hundred years. The one hundred and twenty-five dollars annually subscribed for a Lyceum in the winter is better spent than any other equal sum raised in the town. If we live in the nineteenth century, why should we not enjoy the advantages which the nineteenth century offers? Why should our life be in any respect provincial? If we will read newspapers, why not skip the gossip of Boston and take the best newspaper in the world at once?—not be sucking the pap of “neutral family” papers, or browsing “Olive-Branches” here in New England. Let the reports of all the learned societies come to us, and we will see if they know any thing. Why should we leave it to Harper & Brothers and Redding & Co. to select our reading? As the nobleman of cultivated taste surrounds himself with whatever conduces to his culture,—genius—learning—wit—books—paintings—statuary—music—philosophical instruments, and the like; so let the village do,—not stop short at a pedagogue, a parson, a sexton, a parish library, and three selectmen, because our pilgrim forefathers got through a cold winter once on a bleak rock with these. To act collectively is according to the spirit of our institutions; and I am confident that, as our circumstances are more flourishing, our means are greater than the nobleman’s. New England can hire all the wise men in the world to come and teach her, and board them round the while, and not be provincial at all. That is the uncommon school we want. Instead of noblemen, let us have noble villages of men. If it is necessary, omit one bridge over the river, go round a little there, and throw one arch at least over the darker gulf of ignorance which surrounds us.

We proudly claim to belong to the nineteenth century and are making faster progress than any other nation. But just think about how little this village contributes to its own culture. I don’t want to flatter my fellow townspeople, nor do I want their flattery in return, because that won’t help either of us grow. We need to be pushed—goaded like oxen, as we are, into action. We have a decent system of public schools, but mainly for young children; aside from the underfunded Lyceum in winter, and recently the weak start of a library suggested by the state, there’s no real education for us. We spend more on nearly every kind of food or remedy than we do on our intellectual nourishment. It’s time we had exceptional schools, that we didn’t stop our education when we become adults. It’s time for villages to be like universities, and for their older residents to be the scholars of those universities, with the time—if they’re truly well-off—to engage in meaningful studies for the rest of their lives. Should the world be limited to just one Paris or one Oxford forever? Can’t students be housed here and receive a good education under the skies of Concord? Can’t we hire some gifted lecturer to teach us? Unfortunately, between feeding the livestock and managing the store, we’re kept away from school for too long, and our education suffers as a result. In this country, the village should, in some respects, take the place of the European nobleman. It should be the supporter of the fine arts. It has enough wealth. It just needs the generosity and sophistication. It spends plenty on things that farmers and merchants value, but it’s considered unrealistic to suggest spending money on things that more enlightened people know are far more valuable. This town has spent seventeen thousand dollars on a town hall, whether thanks to luck or politics, but probably won’t invest that much in lively intellect—the real substance to fill that structure—over the next hundred years. The one hundred and twenty-five dollars we subscribe annually for a winter Lyceum is better used than any other equal amount raised in town. If we truly live in the nineteenth century, why shouldn’t we enjoy the benefits it offers? Why should our lives be in any way limited? If we’re going to read newspapers, why not skip the gossip from Boston and get the best newspaper available without delay?—instead of consuming the bland offerings of “neutral family” publications or browsing through “Olive-Branches” here in New England. Let’s receive reports from all the learned societies, and see if they have anything valuable to share. Why should we leave it to Harper & Brothers and Redding & Co. to choose our reading material? Just as a cultivated nobleman surrounds himself with everything that enhances his culture—genius, knowledge, wit, books, paintings, sculpture, music, philosophical instruments, and the like—so should the village strive for more, not just settle for a teacher, a minister, a sexton, a parish library, and three selectmen, because our pioneering ancestors once survived a harsh winter on a lonely rock with just those resources. Acting together aligns with the spirit of our institutions; and I’m confident that, given our better circumstances, we have greater resources than any nobleman. New England can afford to invite all the wise people in the world to teach us, and provide them with food and lodging, without being provincial at all. That is the exceptional school we need. Instead of noblemen, let’s create noble villages of people. If necessary, let’s skip one bridge over the river, take a little detour, and build at least one arch over the dark chasm of ignorance that surrounds us.

Sounds

But while we are confined to books, though the most select and classic, and read only particular written languages, which are themselves but dialects and provincial, we are in danger of forgetting the language which all things and events speak without metaphor, which alone is copious and standard. Much is published, but little printed. The rays which stream through the shutter will be no longer remembered when the shutter is wholly removed. No method nor discipline can supersede the necessity of being forever on the alert. What is a course of history, or philosophy, or poetry, no matter how well selected, or the best society, or the most admirable routine of life, compared with the discipline of looking always at what is to be seen? Will you be a reader, a student merely, or a seer? Read your fate, see what is before you, and walk on into futurity.

But while we’re stuck in books, even the finest and most classic ones, and only read certain written languages, which are just dialects and local variations, we risk forgetting the language that all things and events communicate without needing metaphors, which is the only one that is rich and universal. A lot gets published, but not much gets truly printed. The rays of light that stream through the shutter will be forgotten once the shutter is fully opened. No method or discipline can replace the need to always stay alert. What is a course in history, philosophy, or poetry, no matter how well chosen, or the best company, or the most admirable routine in life, compared to the practice of constantly observing what is present? Will you be just a reader, a mere student, or a true observer? Read your destiny, see what is in front of you, and move forward into the future.

I did not read books the first summer; I hoed beans. Nay, I often did better than this. There were times when I could not afford to sacrifice the bloom of the present moment to any work, whether of the head or hands. I love a broad margin to my life. Sometimes, in a summer morning, having taken my accustomed bath, I sat in my sunny doorway from sunrise till noon, rapt in a revery, amidst the pines and hickories and sumachs, in undisturbed solitude and stillness, while the birds sing around or flitted noiseless through the house, until by the sun falling in at my west window, or the noise of some traveller’s wagon on the distant highway, I was reminded of the lapse of time. I grew in those seasons like corn in the night, and they were far better than any work of the hands would have been. They were not time subtracted from my life, but so much over and above my usual allowance. I realized what the Orientals mean by contemplation and the forsaking of works. For the most part, I minded not how the hours went. The day advanced as if to light some work of mine; it was morning, and lo, now it is evening, and nothing memorable is accomplished. Instead of singing like the birds, I silently smiled at my incessant good fortune. As the sparrow had its trill, sitting on the hickory before my door, so had I my chuckle or suppressed warble which he might hear out of my nest. My days were not days of the week, bearing the stamp of any heathen deity, nor were they minced into hours and fretted by the ticking of a clock; for I lived like the Puri Indians, of whom it is said that “for yesterday, to-day, and to-morrow they have only one word, and they express the variety of meaning by pointing backward for yesterday, forward for to-morrow, and overhead for the passing day.” This was sheer idleness to my fellow-townsmen, no doubt; but if the birds and flowers had tried me by their standard, I should not have been found wanting. A man must find his occasions in himself, it is true. The natural day is very calm, and will hardly reprove his indolence.

I didn't read books that first summer; I hoed beans. Actually, I often did even better than that. There were moments when I couldn’t bring myself to trade the beauty of the present for any kind of work, whether mental or physical. I appreciate a wide-open space in my life. Sometimes, on a summer morning, after my usual bath, I would sit in my sunny doorway from sunrise until noon, lost in thought, surrounded by the pines, hickories, and sumacs, in perfect solitude and stillness, while the birds sang around me or silently fluttered through the house, until the sunlight streaming through my west window or the sound of a traveler’s wagon on the distant road reminded me that time had passed. During those times, I thrived like corn growing at night, and they were far more valuable than any physical labor would have been. Those moments didn’t take away from my life; they were extra, beyond my usual measure. I understood what the Eastern philosophies mean by contemplation and putting aside work. For the most part, I didn’t care how the hours slipped by. The day moved on as if preparing for some task of mine; it was morning, and suddenly it was evening, and nothing significant had been done. Instead of singing like the birds, I quietly appreciated my constant good fortune. Just as the sparrow chirped from the hickory tree by my door, I had my own soft laugh or suppressed tune that he might hear from my nest. My days weren’t divided by the days of the week, marked by any pagan god, nor were they sliced into hours and stressed by the ticking of a clock; I lived like the Puri Indians, who are said to have a single word for yesterday, today, and tomorrow, showing the different meanings by pointing backward for yesterday, forward for tomorrow, and upward for the current day. This was pure laziness in the eyes of my fellow townspeople, no doubt; but if the birds and flowers evaluated me by their standards, I would have been found sufficient. A man must create his own opportunities, that’s true. The natural day is very tranquil and doesn’t really criticize his laziness.

I had this advantage, at least, in my mode of life, over those who were obliged to look abroad for amusement, to society and the theatre, that my life itself was become my amusement and never ceased to be novel. It was a drama of many scenes and without an end. If we were always indeed getting our living, and regulating our lives according to the last and best mode we had learned, we should never be troubled with ennui. Follow your genius closely enough, and it will not fail to show you a fresh prospect every hour. Housework was a pleasant pastime. When my floor was dirty, I rose early, and, setting all my furniture out of doors on the grass, bed and bedstead making but one budget, dashed water on the floor, and sprinkled white sand from the pond on it, and then with a broom scrubbed it clean and white; and by the time the villagers had broken their fast the morning sun had dried my house sufficiently to allow me to move in again, and my meditations were almost uninterupted. It was pleasant to see my whole household effects out on the grass, making a little pile like a gypsy’s pack, and my three-legged table, from which I did not remove the books and pen and ink, standing amid the pines and hickories. They seemed glad to get out themselves, and as if unwilling to be brought in. I was sometimes tempted to stretch an awning over them and take my seat there. It was worth the while to see the sun shine on these things, and hear the free wind blow on them; so much more interesting most familiar objects look out of doors than in the house. A bird sits on the next bough, life-everlasting grows under the table, and blackberry vines run round its legs; pine cones, chestnut burs, and strawberry leaves are strewn about. It looked as if this was the way these forms came to be transferred to our furniture, to tables, chairs, and bedsteads,—because they once stood in their midst.

I had this advantage, at least, in my way of living, over those who had to seek entertainment elsewhere, in society and the theater: my life itself became my entertainment and never stopped being new. It was a drama with many scenes and no end. If we were always truly working to make a living and managing our lives according to the best methods we had learned, we would never be bored. Follow your creativity closely enough, and it will reveal a fresh perspective every hour. Housework was a nice pastime. When my floor needed cleaning, I would get up early, move all my furniture outside onto the grass, combining the bed and bed frame into one bundle, splash water on the floor, sprinkle white sand from the pond on it, and then scrub it clean with a broom. By the time the villagers finished their breakfasts, the morning sun would have dried my house enough for me to move back in, and my thoughts were almost uninterrupted. It was nice to see all my belongings spread out on the grass, making a little pile like a gypsy’s pack, with my three-legged table still holding my books and pen and ink, standing among the pines and hickories. They seemed happy to be outside and reluctant to come back in. I was sometimes tempted to stretch an awning over them and sit there. It was worth it to see the sun shine on these things and feel the fresh wind blow through; familiar objects look so much more interesting outside than inside the house. A bird sat on the nearby branch, everlasting life grew under the table, and blackberry vines wrapped around its legs; pine cones, chestnut burrs, and strawberry leaves were scattered around. It looked as if this was how these shapes were connected to our furniture, to tables, chairs, and beds—because they once stood among them.

My house was on the side of a hill, immediately on the edge of the larger wood, in the midst of a young forest of pitch pines and hickories, and half a dozen rods from the pond, to which a narrow footpath led down the hill. In my front yard grew the strawberry, blackberry, and life-everlasting, johnswort and goldenrod, shrub-oaks and sand-cherry, blueberry and groundnut. Near the end of May, the sand-cherry (Cerasus pumila,) adorned the sides of the path with its delicate flowers arranged in umbels cylindrically about its short stems, which last, in the fall, weighed down with good sized and handsome cherries, fell over in wreaths like rays on every side. I tasted them out of compliment to Nature, though they were scarcely palatable. The sumach (Rhus glabra,) grew luxuriantly about the house, pushing up through the embankment which I had made, and growing five or six feet the first season. Its broad pinnate tropical leaf was pleasant though strange to look on. The large buds, suddenly pushing out late in the spring from dry sticks which had seemed to be dead, developed themselves as by magic into graceful green and tender boughs, an inch in diameter; and sometimes, as I sat at my window, so heedlessly did they grow and tax their weak joints, I heard a fresh and tender bough suddenly fall like a fan to the ground, when there was not a breath of air stirring, broken off by its own weight. In August, the large masses of berries, which, when in flower, had attracted many wild bees, gradually assumed their bright velvety crimson hue, and by their weight again bent down and broke the tender limbs.

My house was on the side of a hill, right at the edge of a bigger forest, surrounded by a young grove of pitch pines and hickories, and just a short walk from the pond, where a narrow footpath led down the hill. In my front yard, I had strawberries, blackberries, life-everlasting, St. John's wort, and goldenrod, along with shrub oaks, sand cherries, blueberries, and groundnuts. Near the end of May, the sand cherry (Cerasus pumila) decorated the sides of the path with its delicate flowers arranged in clusters around its short stems, which in the fall, heavy with good-sized and attractive cherries, drooped down like rays in every direction. I tasted them out of appreciation for Nature, even though they weren't very tasty. The sumac (Rhus glabra) grew abundantly around the house, pushing up through the embankment I had made and reaching five or six feet in its first season. Its broad, pinnate tropical leaves looked nice, though a bit unusual. The large buds, suddenly growing late in the spring from dry sticks that had seemed dead, transformed almost magically into graceful green, tender branches about an inch thick; and sometimes, as I sat at my window, they grew so recklessly and strained their weak joints that I heard a fresh, tender branch suddenly fall to the ground like a fan, even when there wasn’t a breath of wind, broken off by its own weight. In August, the large clusters of berries, which had attracted many wild bees when they were in bloom, gradually turned a bright, velvety crimson, and their weight caused the tender branches to droop and break again.

As I sit at my window this summer afternoon, hawks are circling about my clearing; the tantivy of wild pigeons, flying by twos and threes athwart my view, or perching restless on the white-pine boughs behind my house, gives a voice to the air; a fishhawk dimples the glassy surface of the pond and brings up a fish; a mink steals out of the marsh before my door and seizes a frog by the shore; the sedge is bending under the weight of the reed-birds flitting hither and thither; and for the last half hour I have heard the rattle of railroad cars, now dying away and then reviving like the beat of a partridge, conveying travellers from Boston to the country. For I did not live so out of the world as that boy who, as I hear, was put out to a farmer in the east part of the town, but ere long ran away and came home again, quite down at the heel and homesick. He had never seen such a dull and out-of-the-way place; the folks were all gone off; why, you couldn’t even hear the whistle! I doubt if there is such a place in Massachusetts now:—

As I sit at my window this summer afternoon, hawks are circling over my clearing; the flurry of wild pigeons, flying in pairs and small groups across my view, or perching restlessly on the white-pine branches behind my house, fills the air with sound; a fishhawk ripples the glassy surface of the pond and catches a fish; a mink darts out of the marsh by my door and grabs a frog by the shore; the grass is bending under the weight of the reed-birds flitting around; and for the last half hour, I’ve heard the rattle of railroad cars, fading in and out like the beat of a partridge, carrying travelers from Boston to the countryside. I didn’t live so out of touch with the world like that boy who, I hear, was sent to live with a farmer in the east part of the town, but soon ran away and came home again, quite worn down and homesick. He had never seen such a dull and remote place; everyone had left; you couldn’t even hear the whistle! I doubt there’s a place like that in Massachusetts anymore:—

“In truth, our village has become a butt
For one of those fleet railroad shafts, and o’er
Our peaceful plain its soothing sound is—Concord.”

“In reality, our village has become the target
For one of those quick railroad shafts, and over
Our tranquil plain its calming sound is—Concord.”

The Fitchburg Railroad touches the pond about a hundred rods south of where I dwell. I usually go to the village along its causeway, and am, as it were, related to society by this link. The men on the freight trains, who go over the whole length of the road, bow to me as to an old acquaintance, they pass me so often, and apparently they take me for an employee; and so I am. I too would fain be a track-repairer somewhere in the orbit of the earth.

The Fitchburg Railroad runs near the pond about a hundred rods south of where I live. I usually head to the village along its causeway, and this connection makes me feel linked to society. The guys on the freight trains, who travel the entire length of the line, nod to me like I'm an old friend since they see me so often, and they seem to think I'm part of the crew; and in a way, I am. I would also like to be a track repairer somewhere in the world.

The whistle of the locomotive penetrates my woods summer and winter, sounding like the scream of a hawk sailing over some farmer’s yard, informing me that many restless city merchants are arriving within the circle of the town, or adventurous country traders from the other side. As they come under one horizon, they shout their warning to get off the track to the other, heard sometimes through the circles of two towns. Here come your groceries, country; your rations, countrymen! Nor is there any man so independent on his farm that he can say them nay. And here’s your pay for them! screams the countryman’s whistle; timber like long battering rams going twenty miles an hour against the city’s walls, and chairs enough to seat all the weary and heavy laden that dwell within them. With such huge and lumbering civility the country hands a chair to the city. All the Indian huckleberry hills are stripped, all the cranberry meadows are raked into the city. Up comes the cotton, down goes the woven cloth; up comes the silk, down goes the woollen; up come the books, but down goes the wit that writes them.

The sound of the train cuts through my woods in both summer and winter, like a hawk's cry flying over a farmer’s yard, letting me know that many restless city merchants are arriving in town, along with adventurous traders from the other side. As they come into view, they shout their warnings to clear the tracks to each other, sometimes echoing between the two towns. Here come your groceries, countryside; your supplies, folks from rural areas! No one, no matter how independent they are on their farm, can say no to them. And here’s your payment for those! yells the countryman’s whistle; logs like massive battering rams racing against the city’s walls at twenty miles an hour, and enough chairs to seat all the tired souls living within. With such huge and clumsy hospitality, the countryside offers a chair to the city. All the huckleberry hills have been stripped bare, all the cranberry fields raked clean for the city. Here comes the cotton, down goes the woven fabric; here comes the silk, down goes the wool; up come the books, but down goes the wit that creates them.

When I meet the engine with its train of cars moving off with planetary motion,—or, rather, like a comet, for the beholder knows not if with that velocity and with that direction it will ever revisit this system, since its orbit does not look like a returning curve,—with its steam cloud like a banner streaming behind in golden and silver wreaths, like many a downy cloud which I have seen, high in the heavens, unfolding its masses to the light,—as if this travelling demigod, this cloud-compeller, would ere long take the sunset sky for the livery of his train; when I hear the iron horse make the hills echo with his snort like thunder, shaking the earth with his feet, and breathing fire and smoke from his nostrils, (what kind of winged horse or fiery dragon they will put into the new Mythology I don’t know), it seems as if the earth had got a race now worthy to inhabit it. If all were as it seems, and men made the elements their servants for noble ends! If the cloud that hangs over the engine were the perspiration of heroic deeds, or as beneficent as that which floats over the farmer’s fields, then the elements and Nature herself would cheerfully accompany men on their errands and be their escort.

When I see the train moving away with a kind of cosmic motion—more like a comet, since you can't tell if it will ever come back with that speed and direction, as its path doesn’t seem like a loop—and its steam cloud trailing behind like a banner in golden and silver swirls, similar to the soft clouds I've seen high in the sky spreading out in the light—it feels like this traveling demigod, this cloud-controller, is about to take the sunset sky as its own. When I hear the powerful engine echoing through the hills with a roar like thunder, shaking the ground with its massive feet, and puffing out fire and smoke from its nostrils, I wonder what kind of mythical creature they’ll create in the new mythology. It seems as if the earth has finally gotten a race deserving of it. If everything were as it seems, and people made the elements work for noble purposes! If the cloud hovering over the engine was the sweat of heroic actions, or as helpful as the clouds that drift over the farmer’s fields, then the elements and Nature herself would gladly join men in their missions and be their companions.

I watch the passage of the morning cars with the same feeling that I do the rising of the sun, which is hardly more regular. Their train of clouds stretching far behind and rising higher and higher, going to heaven while the cars are going to Boston, conceals the sun for a minute and casts my distant field into the shade, a celestial train beside which the petty train of cars which hugs the earth is but the barb of the spear. The stabler of the iron horse was up early this winter morning by the light of the stars amid the mountains, to fodder and harness his steed. Fire, too, was awakened thus early to put the vital heat in him and get him off. If the enterprise were as innocent as it is early! If the snow lies deep, they strap on his snow-shoes, and with the giant plow, plow a furrow from the mountains to the seaboard, in which the cars, like a following drill-barrow, sprinkle all the restless men and floating merchandise in the country for seed. All day the fire-steed flies over the country, stopping only that his master may rest, and I am awakened by his tramp and defiant snort at midnight, when in some remote glen in the woods he fronts the elements incased in ice and snow; and he will reach his stall only with the morning star, to start once more on his travels without rest or slumber. Or perchance, at evening, I hear him in his stable blowing off the superfluous energy of the day, that he may calm his nerves and cool his liver and brain for a few hours of iron slumber. If the enterprise were as heroic and commanding as it is protracted and unwearied!

I watch the morning cars pass by with the same feeling I get from the rising sun, which is hardly more consistent. Their trail of clouds stretches far behind and climbs higher and higher, reaching toward the sky while the cars head to Boston, blocking the sun for a moment and casting my distant field into shade. This celestial train makes the small train of cars that rides the earth seem like just the point of a spear. The stableman for the iron horse was up early this winter morning, under the light of the stars among the mountains, to feed and harness his steed. Fire, too, was awake early to get the vital heat into him and send him off. If this operation were as harmless as it is early! If the snow is deep, they strap on his snowshoes, and with the giant plow, create a path from the mountains to the coastline, in which the cars, like a following plow, distribute all the restless people and moving goods all over the country as if they were seeds. All day, the fire steed races across the land, stopping only for his master to take a break, and I am stirred awake by his heavy footsteps and bold snorting at midnight, when in some remote valley in the woods, he confronts the elements encased in ice and snow; he reaches his stable only with the morning star, ready to start his journey again without rest or sleep. Or perhaps, in the evening, I hear him in his stable releasing the excess energy of the day so he can relax and cool down for a few hours of solid sleep. If this operation were as heroic and commanding as it is endless and tireless!

Far through unfrequented woods on the confines of towns, where once only the hunter penetrated by day, in the darkest night dart these bright saloons without the knowledge of their inhabitants; this moment stopping at some brilliant station-house in town or city, where a social crowd is gathered, the next in the Dismal Swamp, scaring the owl and fox. The startings and arrivals of the cars are now the epochs in the village day. They go and come with such regularity and precision, and their whistle can be heard so far, that the farmers set their clocks by them, and thus one well conducted institution regulates a whole country. Have not men improved somewhat in punctuality since the railroad was invented? Do they not talk and think faster in the depot than they did in the stage-office? There is something electrifying in the atmosphere of the former place. I have been astonished at the miracles it has wrought; that some of my neighbors, who, I should have prophesied, once for all, would never get to Boston by so prompt a conveyance, are on hand when the bell rings. To do things “railroad fashion” is now the by-word; and it is worth the while to be warned so often and so sincerely by any power to get off its track. There is no stopping to read the riot act, no firing over the heads of the mob, in this case. We have constructed a fate, an Atropos, that never turns aside. (Let that be the name of your engine.) Men are advertised that at a certain hour and minute these bolts will be shot toward particular points of the compass; yet it interferes with no man’s business, and the children go to school on the other track. We live the steadier for it. We are all educated thus to be sons of Tell. The air is full of invisible bolts. Every path but your own is the path of fate. Keep on your own track, then.

Deep in rarely visited woods on the outskirts of towns, where only hunters used to roam by day, bright train cars now glide through the darkest nights without their passengers even realizing it; one moment they might stop at a lively station in a town or city filled with people, and the next they’re deep in the Dismal Swamp, startling the owl and fox. The arrivals and departures of the trains have become the key events in the village routine. They arrive and leave with such regularity and precision, and their whistle can be heard from afar, that farmers set their clocks by them, and this well-run system essentially coordinates an entire region. Haven’t people improved their punctuality since the invention of the railroad? Don’t they communicate and think more quickly in the train station than they did at the old stage office? There’s an electric energy in the atmosphere of the station. I’ve been amazed by the transformations it has sparked; some of my neighbors, whom I would have bet wouldn’t be able to reach Boston with such prompt service, are ready and waiting when the bell rings. To do things “railroad style” is now the saying; it’s worth noting how often and seriously people are reminded by any force to stay on track. There’s no pausing to read the riot act or firing shots over the crowd in this situation. We’ve created a destiny, an Atropos, that never deviates. (Let that be the name of your engine.) People are informed that at a specific hour and minute, these trains will depart toward certain locations; yet it doesn’t disrupt anyone’s plans, and the kids continue to attend school on the other track. We live more steadily because of it. We are all trained to be sons of Tell. The air is full of invisible bolts. Every path except your own is the path of fate. So stay on your own track.

What recommends commerce to me is its enterprise and bravery. It does not clasp its hands and pray to Jupiter. I see these men every day go about their business with more or less courage and content, doing more even than they suspect, and perchance better employed than they could have consciously devised. I am less affected by their heroism who stood up for half an hour in the front line at Buena Vista, than by the steady and cheerful valor of the men who inhabit the snow-plough for their winter quarters; who have not merely the three-o’-clock in the morning courage, which Bonaparte thought was the rarest, but whose courage does not go to rest so early, who go to sleep only when the storm sleeps or the sinews of their iron steed are frozen. On this morning of the Great Snow, perchance, which is still raging and chilling men’s blood, I hear the muffled tone of their engine bell from out the fog bank of their chilled breath, which announces that the cars are coming, without long delay, notwithstanding the veto of a New England north-east snow storm, and I behold the ploughmen covered with snow and rime, their heads peering, above the mould-board which is turning down other than daisies and the nests of field-mice, like bowlders of the Sierra Nevada, that occupy an outside place in the universe.

What I appreciate about commerce is its initiative and courage. It doesn't just sit back and pray for luck. I see these people every day going about their work with varying levels of bravery and satisfaction, achieving more than they realize, and perhaps doing better than they could have planned. I'm less moved by the heroism of those who stood in the front line at Buena Vista for half an hour, than by the steady and cheerful bravery of the men who operate the snowplow in the winter; they have more than just the early morning courage that Bonaparte claimed was the rarest. Their courage doesn’t fade so soon; they only sleep when the storm quiets down or when their iron horse has frozen up. On this morning of the Great Snow, which is still raging and chilling people’s bones, I hear the muffled sound of their engine bell through the fog of their icy breath, announcing that the trains are coming, without much delay, despite the New England northeast snowstorm. I see the snowplow operators, covered in snow and ice, their heads visible above the plow that is pushing aside not just daisies and the nests of field mice, but obstacles as big as boulders from the Sierra Nevada, which seem to have an outer space presence.

Commerce is unexpectedly confident and serene, alert, adventurous, and unwearied. It is very natural in its methods withal, far more so than many fantastic enterprises and sentimental experiments, and hence its singular success. I am refreshed and expanded when the freight train rattles past me, and I smell the stores which go dispensing their odors all the way from Long Wharf to Lake Champlain, reminding me of foreign parts, of coral reefs, and Indian oceans, and tropical climes, and the extent of the globe. I feel more like a citizen of the world at the sight of the palm-leaf which will cover so many flaxen New England heads the next summer, the Manilla hemp and cocoa-nut husks, the old junk, gunny bags, scrap iron, and rusty nails. This car-load of torn sails is more legible and interesting now than if they should be wrought into paper and printed books. Who can write so graphically the history of the storms they have weathered as these rents have done? They are proof-sheets which need no correction. Here goes lumber from the Maine woods, which did not go out to sea in the last freshet, risen four dollars on the thousand because of what did go out or was split up; pine, spruce, cedar,—first, second, third, and fourth qualities, so lately all of one quality, to wave over the bear, and moose, and caribou. Next rolls Thomaston lime, a prime lot, which will get far among the hills before it gets slacked. These rags in bales, of all hues and qualities, the lowest condition to which cotton and linen descend, the final result of dress,—of patterns which are now no longer cried up, unless it be in Milwaukie, as those splendid articles, English, French, or American prints, ginghams, muslins, &c., gathered from all quarters both of fashion and poverty, going to become paper of one color or a few shades only, on which forsooth will be written tales of real life, high and low, and founded on fact! This closed car smells of salt fish, the strong New England and commercial scent, reminding me of the Grand Banks and the fisheries. Who has not seen a salt fish, thoroughly cured for this world, so that nothing can spoil it, and putting the perseverance of the saints to the blush? with which you may sweep or pave the streets, and split your kindlings, and the teamster shelter himself and his lading against sun wind and rain behind it,—and the trader, as a Concord trader once did, hang it up by his door for a sign when he commences business, until at last his oldest customer cannot tell surely whether it be animal, vegetable, or mineral, and yet it shall be as pure as a snowflake, and if it be put into a pot and boiled, will come out an excellent dun fish for a Saturday’s dinner. Next Spanish hides, with the tails still preserving their twist and the angle of elevation they had when the oxen that wore them were careering over the pampas of the Spanish main,—a type of all obstinacy, and evincing how almost hopeless and incurable are all constitutional vices. I confess, that practically speaking, when I have learned a man’s real disposition, I have no hopes of changing it for the better or worse in this state of existence. As the Orientals say, “A cur’s tail may be warmed, and pressed, and bound round with ligatures, and after a twelve years’ labor bestowed upon it, still it will retain its natural form.” The only effectual cure for such inveteracies as these tails exhibit is to make glue of them, which I believe is what is usually done with them, and then they will stay put and stick. Here is a hogshead of molasses or of brandy directed to John Smith, Cuttingsville, Vermont, some trader among the Green Mountains, who imports for the farmers near his clearing, and now perchance stands over his bulk-head and thinks of the last arrivals on the coast, how they may affect the price for him, telling his customers this moment, as he has told them twenty times before this morning, that he expects some by the next train of prime quality. It is advertised in the Cuttingsville Times.

Commerce is surprisingly confident and calm, alert, adventurous, and tireless. It uses very natural methods, much more so than many fanciful ventures and emotional experiments, which is why it is so successful. I feel refreshed and invigorated when the freight train rumbles past me, and I catch the scents wafting from stores all the way from Long Wharf to Lake Champlain, which remind me of distant places, coral reefs, Indian oceans, tropical climates, and the vastness of the world. I feel more like a global citizen when I see the palm leaves that will shade many blonde New England heads next summer, along with Manila hemp and coconut husks, old junk, burlap bags, scrap iron, and rusty nails. This load of tattered sails is more telling and fascinating now than if they were turned into paper and printed books. Who can narrate the tales of the storms they’ve survived as well as these tattered pieces can? They are proof sheets that need no editing. Here comes lumber from the Maine woods that didn’t wash out to sea during the last flood, now worth four dollars more per thousand because of what did make it out or was split; pine, spruce, cedar—first, second, third, and fourth grades, all recently one grade, destined to shelter the bear, moose, and caribou. Next, we have a high-quality batch of Thomaston lime that will travel far into the hills before it gets slaked. These bales of rags, in every color and quality, represent the lowest state cotton and linen can reach, the end result of clothing—patterns that are no longer in demand, unless perhaps in Milwaukee, compared to those exquisite items like English, French, or American prints, ginghams, muslins, etc., gathered from all corners of fashion and poverty, destined to become paper of one color or just a few shades, on which true stories—high and low, based on real life—will be written! This closed car smells of salt fish, the strong scent of New England commerce, reminding me of the Grand Banks and the fisheries. Who hasn't seen salt fish, perfectly cured for our world, so that it can’t spoil, putting the perseverance of the saints to shame? You could use it to sweep or pave streets, chop it into kindling, and teamsters could shelter themselves and their loads from sun, wind, and rain behind it—and a trader, like one from Concord, possibly did, hanging it by his door as a sign when he started his business, until eventually, even his oldest customer couldn't tell if it was animal, vegetable, or mineral, yet it would be as pure as a snowflake, and if boiled, would make a great dun fish for Saturday dinner. Next are Spanish hides, still twisted and angled as they were when the oxen that wore them roamed the pampas of the Spanish main—a symbol of stubbornness, showing how almost impossible it is to change someone's fundamental flaws. Honestly, when I've figured out a person's true character, I have little hope of changing it for better or worse during this lifetime. As the Orientals say, “A cur's tail can be warmed, pressed, and bound with ligatures, and after twelve years of effort, it will still keep its natural shape.” The only effective way to fix such stubbornness, like that shown by these tails, is to turn them into glue, which is what usually happens, and then they will stay put and stick. Here’s a hogshead of molasses or brandy meant for John Smith in Cuttingsville, Vermont, some trader among the Green Mountains, who imports for farmers near his settlement and is currently standing over his stock, pondering how the latest arrivals on the coast might affect his prices, telling his customers right now, just as he has said twenty times already this morning, that he expects some prime quality goods by the next train. It's advertised in the Cuttingsville Times.

While these things go up other things come down. Warned by the whizzing sound, I look up from my book and see some tall pine, hewn on far northern hills, which has winged its way over the Green Mountains and the Connecticut, shot like an arrow through the township within ten minutes, and scarce another eye beholds it; going

While these things go up, other things come down. Hearing the whizzing sound, I look up from my book and see a tall pine, cut down in the far northern hills, which has flown over the Green Mountains and the Connecticut River, shot like an arrow through the town in less than ten minutes, and hardly anyone else sees it; going

“to be the mast
Of some great ammiral.”

“to be the mast
of some great admiral.”

And hark! here comes the cattle-train bearing the cattle of a thousand hills, sheepcots, stables, and cow-yards in the air, drovers with their sticks, and shepherd boys in the midst of their flocks, all but the mountain pastures, whirled along like leaves blown from the mountains by the September gales. The air is filled with the bleating of calves and sheep, and the hustling of oxen, as if a pastoral valley were going by. When the old bell-wether at the head rattles his bell, the mountains do indeed skip like rams and the little hills like lambs. A car-load of drovers, too, in the midst, on a level with their droves now, their vocation gone, but still clinging to their useless sticks as their badge of office. But their dogs, where are they? It is a stampede to them; they are quite thrown out; they have lost the scent. Methinks I hear them barking behind the Peterboro’ Hills, or panting up the western slope of the Green Mountains. They will not be in at the death. Their vocation, too, is gone. Their fidelity and sagacity are below par now. They will slink back to their kennels in disgrace, or perchance run wild and strike a league with the wolf and the fox. So is your pastoral life whirled past and away. But the bell rings, and I must get off the track and let the cars go by;—

And look! here comes the cattle train carrying the livestock from a thousand hills, sheep pens, stables, and cow yards swirling in the air, with drovers and their sticks, and shepherd boys among their flocks, all except the mountain pastures, blown along like leaves swept from the mountains by the September winds. The air is filled with the bleating of calves and sheep, and the hustle of oxen, as if a pastoral valley is passing by. When the old bellwether at the front shakes his bell, the mountains really do bounce like rams and the small hills like lambs. There’s also a carload of drovers in the middle, level with their herds now, their work finished, but still holding onto their useless sticks as a badge of their role. But where are their dogs? It’s a mess for them; they’ve been completely thrown off; they’ve lost the scent. I think I hear them barking behind the Peterboro’ Hills, or panting up the western slope of the Green Mountains. They won’t be in at the finish. Their role is over too. Their loyalty and smarts are lacking now. They’ll sneak back to their kennels in shame, or maybe run wild and team up with the wolf and the fox. So goes your pastoral life, rushed past and away. But the bell rings, and I have to get off the tracks and let the trains go by;—

What’s the railroad to me?
I never go to see
Where it ends.
It fills a few hollows,
And makes banks for the swallows,
It sets the sand a-blowing,
And the blackberries a-growing,

What’s the railroad to me?
I never go to see
Where it ends.
It fills a few low spots,
And creates banks for the swallows,
It sets the sand blowing,
And the blackberries growing,

but I cross it like a cart-path in the woods. I will not have my eyes put out and my ears spoiled by its smoke and steam and hissing.

but I cross it like a dirt path in the woods. I won't let its smoke and steam and hissing blind me and ruin my hearing.

Now that the cars are gone by and all the restless world with them, and the fishes in the pond no longer feel their rumbling, I am more alone than ever. For the rest of the long afternoon, perhaps, my meditations are interrupted only by the faint rattle of a carriage or team along the distant highway.

Now that the cars have passed and the restless world has gone with them, and the fish in the pond no longer feel their rumbling, I feel more alone than ever. For the rest of the long afternoon, my thoughts are interrupted only by the faint sound of a carriage or vehicle along the distant highway.

Sometimes, on Sundays, I heard the bells, the Lincoln, Acton, Bedford, or Concord bell, when the wind was favorable, a faint, sweet, and, as it were, natural melody, worth importing into the wilderness. At a sufficient distance over the woods this sound acquires a certain vibratory hum, as if the pine needles in the horizon were the strings of a harp which it swept. All sound heard at the greatest possible distance produces one and the same effect, a vibration of the universal lyre, just as the intervening atmosphere makes a distant ridge of earth interesting to our eyes by the azure tint it imparts to it. There came to me in this case a melody which the air had strained, and which had conversed with every leaf and needle of the wood, that portion of the sound which the elements had taken up and modulated and echoed from vale to vale. The echo is, to some extent, an original sound, and therein is the magic and charm of it. It is not merely a repetition of what was worth repeating in the bell, but partly the voice of the wood; the same trivial words and notes sung by a wood-nymph.

Sometimes, on Sundays, I would hear the bells—the ones from Lincoln, Acton, Bedford, or Concord—when the wind was just right. It was a faint, sweet, and almost natural melody that felt worth bringing into the wild. From a good distance over the woods, this sound took on a certain vibratory hum, as if the pine needles on the horizon were the strings of a harp being played. Any sound heard from the farthest possible distance creates the same effect, a vibration of the universal lyre, just like how the atmosphere makes a distant ridge of land look appealing by giving it a blue tint. In this case, a melody came to me, one that the air had filtered and had interacted with every leaf and needle in the forest. That part of the sound had been taken in, reshaped, and echoed from valley to valley. The echo is somewhat an original sound, and that’s where its magic lies. It’s not just a replay of what was worth repeating from the bell, but also the voice of the woods; the same simple words and notes sung by a wood-nymph.

At evening, the distant lowing of some cow in the horizon beyond the woods sounded sweet and melodious, and at first I would mistake it for the voices of certain minstrels by whom I was sometimes serenaded, who might be straying over hill and dale; but soon I was not unpleasantly disappointed when it was prolonged into the cheap and natural music of the cow. I do not mean to be satirical, but to express my appreciation of those youths’ singing, when I state that I perceived clearly that it was akin to the music of the cow, and they were at length one articulation of Nature.

In the evening, the distant sound of a cow mooing on the horizon beyond the woods was sweet and melodic. At first, I would mistake it for the voices of some minstrels who sometimes serenaded me as they wandered over hills and valleys. However, I was pleasantly surprised when it turned into the simple, natural music of the cow. I don’t mean to be sarcastic; I genuinely appreciate those young singers, and I realize that their music was very similar to the cow's sound, ultimately forming a single expression of Nature.

Regularly at half past seven, in one part of the summer, after the evening train had gone by, the whippoorwills chanted their vespers for half an hour, sitting on a stump by my door, or upon the ridge pole of the house. They would begin to sing almost with as much precision as a clock, within five minutes of a particular time, referred to the setting of the sun, every evening. I had a rare opportunity to become acquainted with their habits. Sometimes I heard four or five at once in different parts of the wood, by accident one a bar behind another, and so near me that I distinguished not only the cluck after each note, but often that singular buzzing sound like a fly in a spider’s web, only proportionally louder. Sometimes one would circle round and round me in the woods a few feet distant as if tethered by a string, when probably I was near its eggs. They sang at intervals throughout the night, and were again as musical as ever just before and about dawn.

Regularly at 7:30 in the summer, after the evening train had passed, the whippoorwills sang their evening songs for half an hour, perched on a stump by my door or on the ridge of the house. They would start singing almost on the dot, within five minutes of a specific time that aligned with sunset each evening. I had a unique chance to observe their habits. Sometimes I heard four or five singing at the same time in different parts of the woods, occasionally one a beat behind the others, and so close to me that I could hear not just the cluck after each note but also that distinct buzzing sound like a fly caught in a spider's web, only louder. Occasionally, one would circle around me in the woods just a few feet away, as if connected by a string, likely because I was near its nest. They sang at intervals throughout the night and were just as musical as ever just before and around dawn.

When other birds are still the screech owls take up the strain, like mourning women their ancient u-lu-lu. Their dismal scream is truly Ben Jonsonian. Wise midnight hags! It is no honest and blunt tu-whit tu-who of the poets, but, without jesting, a most solemn graveyard ditty, the mutual consolations of suicide lovers remembering the pangs and the delights of supernal love in the infernal groves. Yet I love to hear their wailing, their doleful responses, trilled along the wood-side; reminding me sometimes of music and singing birds; as if it were the dark and tearful side of music, the regrets and sighs that would fain be sung. They are the spirits, the low spirits and melancholy forebodings, of fallen souls that once in human shape night-walked the earth and did the deeds of darkness, now expiating their sins with their wailing hymns or threnodies in the scenery of their transgressions. They give me a new sense of the variety and capacity of that nature which is our common dwelling. Oh-o-o-o-o that I never had been bor-r-r-r-n! sighs one on this side of the pond, and circles with the restlessness of despair to some new perch on the gray oaks. Then—that I never had been bor-r-r-r-n! echoes another on the farther side with tremulous sincerity, and—bor-r-r-r-n! comes faintly from far in the Lincoln woods.

When other birds are quiet, the screech owls take up the call, like mournful women with their ancient u-lu-lu. Their eerie scream is truly reminiscent of Ben Jonson. Wise midnight hags! It’s not the straightforward tu-whit tu-who of the poets, but rather, without a hint of humor, a very serious graveyard song, the shared sorrows of lovers who have taken their own lives, remembering the joys and pains of transcendent love in the hellish groves. Yet I enjoy hearing their wailing, their sorrowful replies, echoing along the woods; sometimes reminding me of music and singing birds, as if it were the dark and emotional aspect of music, the regrets and sighs that long to be sung. They are the spirits, the low spirits and melancholy warnings, of fallen souls that once walked the earth in human form and committed dark deeds, now paying for their sins with their haunting hymns or laments in the places of their wrongs. They provide me with a new appreciation for the variety and depth of that nature which is our shared home. Oh-o-o-o-o that I never had been bor-r-r-r-n! sighs one on this side of the pond, circling restlessly in despair to find a new perch on the gray oaks. Then—that I never had been bor-r-r-r-n! echoes another on the other side with trembling sincerity, and—bor-r-r-r-n! comes faintly from deep in the Lincoln woods.

I was also serenaded by a hooting owl. Near at hand you could fancy it the most melancholy sound in Nature, as if she meant by this to stereotype and make permanent in her choir the dying moans of a human being,—some poor weak relic of mortality who has left hope behind, and howls like an animal, yet with human sobs, on entering the dark valley, made more awful by a certain gurgling melodiousness,—I find myself beginning with the letters gl when I try to imitate it,—expressive of a mind which has reached the gelatinous mildewy stage in the mortification of all healthy and courageous thought. It reminded me of ghouls and idiots and insane howlings. But now one answers from far woods in a strain made really melodious by distance,—Hoo hoo hoo, hoorer hoo; and indeed for the most part it suggested only pleasing associations, whether heard by day or night, summer or winter.

I was also serenaded by a hooting owl. Up close, you might think it the saddest sound in Nature, as if she intended to capture and make permanent in her chorus the dying cries of a person—some poor, weak remnant of humanity who has given up hope and howls like an animal, yet with human sobs, as they enter the dark valley, which is made even more terrifying by a certain gurgling melodiousness—I catch myself starting with the letters gl when I try to imitate it—expressive of a mind that has reached a slimy, moldy state in the decay of all healthy and brave thoughts. It reminded me of ghouls and fools and crazy howls. But now one responds from distant woods in a tune that is truly beautiful because of the distance—Hoo hoo hoo, hoorer hoo; and indeed, mostly it brought to mind only pleasant associations, whether heard by day or night, summer or winter.

I rejoice that there are owls. Let them do the idiotic and maniacal hooting for men. It is a sound admirably suited to swamps and twilight woods which no day illustrates, suggesting a vast and undeveloped nature which men have not recognized. They represent the stark twilight and unsatisfied thoughts which all have. All day the sun has shone on the surface of some savage swamp, where the single spruce stands hung with usnea lichens, and small hawks circulate above, and the chickadee lisps amid the evergreens, and the partridge and rabbit skulk beneath; but now a more dismal and fitting day dawns, and a different race of creatures awakes to express the meaning of Nature there.

I’m glad there are owls. Let them make the silly and wild hooting sounds for us. It’s a noise that perfectly fits swamps and dim woods that daylight doesn’t capture, hinting at a vast and untouched nature that people haven’t noticed. They embody the deep twilight and the restless thoughts we all have. All day, the sun has lit up the surface of some wild swamp, where a lone spruce is draped with usnea lichen, small hawks circle overhead, the chickadee chats among the evergreens, and the partridge and rabbit hide below; but now a gloomier and more appropriate day begins, and another group of creatures wakes to convey the essence of Nature there.

Late in the evening I heard the distant rumbling of wagons over bridges,—a sound heard farther than almost any other at night,—the baying of dogs, and sometimes again the lowing of some disconsolate cow in a distant barn-yard. In the mean while all the shore rang with the trump of bullfrogs, the sturdy spirits of ancient wine-bibbers and wassailers, still unrepentant, trying to sing a catch in their Stygian lake,—if the Walden nymphs will pardon the comparison, for though there are almost no weeds, there are frogs there,—who would fain keep up the hilarious rules of their old festal tables, though their voices have waxed hoarse and solemnly grave, mocking at mirth, and the wine has lost its flavor, and become only liquor to distend their paunches, and sweet intoxication never comes to drown the memory of the past, but mere saturation and waterloggedness and distention. The most aldermanic, with his chin upon a heart-leaf, which serves for a napkin to his drooling chaps, under this northern shore quaffs a deep draught of the once scorned water, and passes round the cup with the ejaculation tr-r-r-oonk, tr-r-r-oonk, tr-r-r-oonk! and straightway comes over the water from some distant cove the same password repeated, where the next in seniority and girth has gulped down to his mark; and when this observance has made the circuit of the shores, then ejaculates the master of ceremonies, with satisfaction, tr-r-r-oonk! and each in his turn repeats the same down to the least distended, leakiest, and flabbiest paunched, that there be no mistake; and then the bowl goes round again and again, until the sun disperses the morning mist, and only the patriarch is not under the pond, but vainly bellowing troonk from time to time, and pausing for a reply.

Late in the evening, I heard the distant rumbling of wagons over bridges—a sound that carries farther than almost any other at night—the barking of dogs, and sometimes again the lowing of a lonely cow in a far-off barnyard. Meanwhile, the shore echoed with the croaking of bullfrogs, the enduring spirits of ancient drinkers and party-goers, still unrepentant, trying to sing a tune in their dark lake—if the Walden nymphs will forgive the comparison, because even though there are hardly any weeds, there are frogs there—who long to maintain the joyful traditions of their old festive tables, even though their voices have grown hoarse and solemn, mocking at joy, and the wine has lost its flavor, turning into just liquor to swell their bellies, and sweet intoxication never comes to wash away the memories of the past, only heaviness and saturation. The most portly of them, with his chin resting on a heart-shaped leaf that serves as a napkin for his drooling mouth, under this northern shore drinks deeply from the once-despised water, passing the cup around with the shout tr-r-r-oonk, tr-r-r-oonk, tr-r-r-oonk! and immediately a response comes back over the water from some distant cove, where the next biggest and heaviest has gulped down to his fill; and when this ritual has gone around the shores, then the master of ceremonies shouts, satisfied, tr-r-r-oonk! and each in turn repeats the same down to the least distended, leakiest, and flabbiest of them, ensuring there’s no confusion; and then the bowl goes around again and again, until the sun drives away the morning mist, and only the oldest is left not submerged in the pond, but calling out troonk from time to time, waiting for a response.

I am not sure that I ever heard the sound of cock-crowing from my clearing, and I thought that it might be worth the while to keep a cockerel for his music merely, as a singing bird. The note of this once wild Indian pheasant is certainly the most remarkable of any bird’s, and if they could be naturalized without being domesticated, it would soon become the most famous sound in our woods, surpassing the clangor of the goose and the hooting of the owl; and then imagine the cackling of the hens to fill the pauses when their lords’ clarions rested! No wonder that man added this bird to his tame stock,—to say nothing of the eggs and drumsticks. To walk in a winter morning in a wood where these birds abounded, their native woods, and hear the wild cockerels crow on the trees, clear and shrill for miles over the resounding earth, drowning the feebler notes of other birds,—think of it! It would put nations on the alert. Who would not be early to rise, and rise earlier and earlier every successive day of his life, till he became unspeakably healthy, wealthy, and wise? This foreign bird’s note is celebrated by the poets of all countries along with the notes of their native songsters. All climates agree with brave Chanticleer. He is more indigenous even than the natives. His health is ever good, his lungs are sound, his spirits never flag. Even the sailor on the Atlantic and Pacific is awakened by his voice; but its shrill sound never roused me from my slumbers. I kept neither dog, cat, cow, pig, nor hens, so that you would have said there was a deficiency of domestic sounds; neither the churn, nor the spinning wheel, nor even the singing of the kettle, nor the hissing of the urn, nor children crying, to comfort one. An old-fashioned man would have lost his senses or died of ennui before this. Not even rats in the wall, for they were starved out, or rather were never baited in,—only squirrels on the roof and under the floor, a whippoorwill on the ridge pole, a blue-jay screaming beneath the window, a hare or woodchuck under the house, a screech-owl or a cat-owl behind it, a flock of wild geese or a laughing loon on the pond, and a fox to bark in the night. Not even a lark or an oriole, those mild plantation birds, ever visited my clearing. No cockerels to crow nor hens to cackle in the yard. No yard! but unfenced Nature reaching up to your very sills. A young forest growing up under your meadows, and wild sumachs and blackberry vines breaking through into your cellar; sturdy pitch pines rubbing and creaking against the shingles for want of room, their roots reaching quite under the house. Instead of a scuttle or a blind blown off in the gale,—a pine tree snapped off or torn up by the roots behind your house for fuel. Instead of no path to the front-yard gate in the Great Snow,—no gate,—no front-yard,—and no path to the civilized world!

I’m not sure I ever heard a rooster crow from my clearing, but I thought it might be nice to keep a rooster just for its song, like a singing bird. The call of this once-wild Indian pheasant is definitely the most remarkable of any bird's, and if they could be adapted to the wild without becoming domesticated, it would quickly become the most famous sound in our woods, outdoing the honking of geese and the hooting of owls. Just imagine the hens cackling to fill the gaps when their roosters took a break! It’s no surprise that people added this bird to their farm animals—let alone the eggs and meat. Walking through a forest on a winter morning where these birds thrived, hearing the wild roosters crowing in the trees, clear and sharp for miles, overpowering the quieter sounds of other birds—think of that! It would wake nations up. Who wouldn’t want to get up early, waking earlier and earlier each day until they became incredibly healthy, wealthy, and wise? Poets from all over celebrate the call of this foreign bird alongside their native songbirds. All climates suit brave Chanticleer. He feels more at home here than the locals. He’s always healthy, has strong lungs, and never gets tired. Even sailors on the Atlantic and Pacific are woken by his voice, but his loud call never stirred me from sleep. I didn’t keep any dogs, cats, cows, pigs, or hens, so you might say there was a lack of domestic sounds; there was no churn, no spinning wheel, no singing kettle, no hissing urn, and no children crying to offer comfort. An old-fashioned person would have lost their mind or died of boredom in this silence. Not even rats in the walls, as they were starved out or never lured in—only squirrels on the roof and under the floor, a whip-poor-will on the ridge pole, a blue jay screaming outside the window, a rabbit or woodchuck under the house, a screech owl or a barn owl nearby, a flock of wild geese or a laughing loon on the pond, and a fox barking at night. I didn’t even see a lark or an oriole, those gentle birds of cultivation, come visit my clearing. No roosters crowing or hens cackling in the yard. No yard! Just unfenced nature right up to your doorstep. A young forest growing beneath your meadows, wild sumacs and blackberry vines breaking through into your cellar; sturdy pitch pines rubbing and creaking against the shingles for lack of space, their roots digging deep beneath the house. Instead of a scuttle or a blind blown off in a storm—a pine tree snapped off or uprooted behind your house for firewood. Instead of having no path to the front gate in the heavy snow—no gate—no front yard—and no path to the civilized world!

Solitude

This is a delicious evening, when the whole body is one sense, and imbibes delight through every pore. I go and come with a strange liberty in Nature, a part of herself. As I walk along the stony shore of the pond in my shirt sleeves, though it is cool as well as cloudy and windy, and I see nothing special to attract me, all the elements are unusually congenial to me. The bullfrogs trump to usher in the night, and the note of the whippoorwill is borne on the rippling wind from over the water. Sympathy with the fluttering alder and poplar leaves almost takes away my breath; yet, like the lake, my serenity is rippled but not ruffled. These small waves raised by the evening wind are as remote from storm as the smooth reflecting surface. Though it is now dark, the wind still blows and roars in the wood, the waves still dash, and some creatures lull the rest with their notes. The repose is never complete. The wildest animals do not repose, but seek their prey now; the fox, and skunk, and rabbit, now roam the fields and woods without fear. They are Nature’s watchmen,—links which connect the days of animated life.

This is a wonderful evening when my whole body feels alive, soaking in joy from every pore. I move around freely in Nature, feeling like a part of her. As I stroll along the rocky shore of the pond in my shirtsleeves, even though it’s cool, cloudy, and windy, I notice nothing particularly special to draw my attention, yet all the elements feel unusually harmonious with me. The bullfrogs croak to announce the night, and the sound of the whippoorwill drifts over the water on the gentle breeze. I almost lose my breath in sympathy with the fluttering leaves of the alders and poplars; still, like the lake, my calmness is stirred but not disturbed. The small ripples made by the evening wind are as far from a storm as the placid, reflective surface. Although it’s dark now, the wind continues to blow and roar through the woods, the waves still crash, and some creatures soothe the others with their calls. The tranquility is never complete. The wildest animals are restless, seeking their prey; the fox, skunk, and rabbit now wander the fields and woods without fear. They are Nature’s sentinels—links that connect the days of lively existence.

When I return to my house I find that visitors have been there and left their cards, either a bunch of flowers, or a wreath of evergreen, or a name in pencil on a yellow walnut leaf or a chip. They who come rarely to the woods take some little piece of the forest into their hands to play with by the way, which they leave, either intentionally or accidentally. One has peeled a willow wand, woven it into a ring, and dropped it on my table. I could always tell if visitors had called in my absence, either by the bended twigs or grass, or the print of their shoes, and generally of what sex or age or quality they were by some slight trace left, as a flower dropped, or a bunch of grass plucked and thrown away, even as far off as the railroad, half a mile distant, or by the lingering odor of a cigar or pipe. Nay, I was frequently notified of the passage of a traveller along the highway sixty rods off by the scent of his pipe.

When I get back to my house, I find that visitors have come by and left their cards—sometimes a bunch of flowers, a wreath of evergreen, or a name written in pencil on a yellow walnut leaf or a piece of bark. Those who don’t visit the woods often take a little piece of the forest with them, either to play with or simply to leave behind, whether intentionally or accidentally. Someone has peeled a willow branch, turned it into a ring, and dropped it on my table. I can always tell if visitors stopped by while I was away, either by the bent twigs or grass or the impression of their shoes. I can usually guess their gender, age, or social status based on some small trace they left behind, like a dropped flower or a handful of grass tossed aside, even from as far away as the railroad, half a mile off, or from the lingering scent of a cigar or pipe. In fact, I often notice when a traveler passes by on the highway sixty rods away just from the smell of their pipe.

There is commonly sufficient space about us. Our horizon is never quite at our elbows. The thick wood is not just at our door, nor the pond, but somewhat is always clearing, familiar and worn by us, appropriated and fenced in some way, and reclaimed from Nature. For what reason have I this vast range and circuit, some square miles of unfrequented forest, for my privacy, abandoned to me by men? My nearest neighbor is a mile distant, and no house is visible from any place but the hill-tops within half a mile of my own. I have my horizon bounded by woods all to myself; a distant view of the railroad where it touches the pond on the one hand, and of the fence which skirts the woodland road on the other. But for the most part it is as solitary where I live as on the prairies. It is as much Asia or Africa as New England. I have, as it were, my own sun and moon and stars, and a little world all to myself. At night there was never a traveller passed my house, or knocked at my door, more than if I were the first or last man; unless it were in the spring, when at long intervals some came from the village to fish for pouts,—they plainly fished much more in the Walden Pond of their own natures, and baited their hooks with darkness,—but they soon retreated, usually with light baskets, and left “the world to darkness and to me,” and the black kernel of the night was never profaned by any human neighborhood. I believe that men are generally still a little afraid of the dark, though the witches are all hung, and Christianity and candles have been introduced.

There's usually plenty of space around us. Our horizon is never really close at hand. The dense forest isn't just at our doorstep, nor is the pond, but it feels like it's always clearing up, familiar and worn by us, claimed and fenced off in some way, reclaimed from Nature. Why do I have this vast stretch of land, some square miles of untouched forest, for my privacy, left to me by people? My closest neighbor is a mile away, and no house is in sight from anywhere, except for the hilltops within half a mile of mine. I have my own horizon surrounded by woods; I can see the distant railroad where it meets the pond on one side, and the fence that follows the woodland road on the other. But mostly, it feels as isolated as living on the prairies. It feels as much like Asia or Africa as it does New England. I have, in a sense, my own sun and moon and stars, and a little world all to myself. At night, no traveler has ever passed by my house or knocked on my door, as if I were the first or last person on earth; unless it was in the spring when, at long intervals, some people came from the village to fish for pouts—they clearly fished much more in the Walden Pond of their own natures, using darkness as bait—but they would leave quickly, usually with empty baskets, leaving “the world to darkness and to me,” and the deep night was never disturbed by human presence. I believe that people are still a bit afraid of the dark, even though the witches are all gone and Christianity and candles have been introduced.

Yet I experienced sometimes that the most sweet and tender, the most innocent and encouraging society may be found in any natural object, even for the poor misanthrope and most melancholy man. There can be no very black melancholy to him who lives in the midst of Nature and has his senses still. There was never yet such a storm but it was Æolian music to a healthy and innocent ear. Nothing can rightly compel a simple and brave man to a vulgar sadness. While I enjoy the friendship of the seasons I trust that nothing can make life a burden to me. The gentle rain which waters my beans and keeps me in the house to-day is not drear and melancholy, but good for me too. Though it prevents my hoeing them, it is of far more worth than my hoeing. If it should continue so long as to cause the seeds to rot in the ground and destroy the potatoes in the low lands, it would still be good for the grass on the uplands, and, being good for the grass, it would be good for me. Sometimes, when I compare myself with other men, it seems as if I were more favored by the gods than they, beyond any deserts that I am conscious of; as if I had a warrant and surety at their hands which my fellows have not, and were especially guided and guarded. I do not flatter myself, but if it be possible they flatter me. I have never felt lonesome, or in the least oppressed by a sense of solitude, but once, and that was a few weeks after I came to the woods, when, for an hour, I doubted if the near neighborhood of man was not essential to a serene and healthy life. To be alone was something unpleasant. But I was at the same time conscious of a slight insanity in my mood, and seemed to foresee my recovery. In the midst of a gentle rain while these thoughts prevailed, I was suddenly sensible of such sweet and beneficent society in Nature, in the very pattering of the drops, and in every sound and sight around my house, an infinite and unaccountable friendliness all at once like an atmosphere sustaining me, as made the fancied advantages of human neighborhood insignificant, and I have never thought of them since. Every little pine needle expanded and swelled with sympathy and befriended me. I was so distinctly made aware of the presence of something kindred to me, even in scenes which we are accustomed to call wild and dreary, and also that the nearest of blood to me and humanest was not a person nor a villager, that I thought no place could ever be strange to me again.—

Yet I sometimes found that the sweetest and most caring, the most innocent and uplifting company can be found in any natural object, even for the poor misanthrope and the most melancholy person. There can be no deep sadness for someone who lives in the midst of Nature and is still in tune with their senses. There has never been a storm that wasn’t like music to a healthy and innocent ear. Nothing can truly force a simple and brave person into a common sadness. While I enjoy the friendship of the seasons, I believe that nothing can make life a burden for me. The gentle rain that waters my beans and keeps me indoors today isn’t depressing; it's good for me too. Even though it stops me from hoeing them, it’s far more valuable than that work. If it went on long enough to rot the seeds in the ground and ruin the potatoes in the lowlands, it would still be beneficial for the grass on the uplands, and since it’s good for the grass, it’s good for me. Sometimes, when I compare myself to other men, it seems like I’m favored by the gods more than they are, beyond any merit I think I have; as if I have a guarantee and protection from them that my peers do not, and feel especially guided and watched over. I don’t flatter myself, but if it’s possible, they might flatter me. I’ve never felt lonely or even slightly burdened by a sense of solitude, except once, a few weeks after I moved to the woods, when I briefly wondered if being near people was essential for a calm and healthy life. Being alone felt unpleasant. But at the same time, I was aware of a slight madness in my mood and could sense my recovery. In the middle of a gentle rain, while these thoughts lingered, I suddenly felt such sweet and nurturing company in Nature, in the very sound of the raindrops, and in every sight and sound around my house, as if an infinite and unexplainable friendliness enveloped me, making the imagined advantages of human company seem trivial, and I haven’t thought about them since. Every little pine needle seemed to swell with sympathy and befriend me. I became acutely aware of the presence of something kindred to me, even in places we usually call wild and dreary, and realized that the closest connection I had to humanity wasn’t a person or a villager; it was Nature itself, leading me to believe that no place could ever feel strange to me again.

“Mourning untimely consumes the sad;
Few are their days in the land of the living,
Beautiful daughter of Toscar.”

“Mourning quickly overwhelms the sorrowful;
Few are their days in the land of the living,
Beautiful daughter of Toscar.”

Some of my pleasantest hours were during the long rain storms in the spring or fall, which confined me to the house for the afternoon as well as the forenoon, soothed by their ceaseless roar and pelting; when an early twilight ushered in a long evening in which many thoughts had time to take root and unfold themselves. In those driving north-east rains which tried the village houses so, when the maids stood ready with mop and pail in front entries to keep the deluge out, I sat behind my door in my little house, which was all entry, and thoroughly enjoyed its protection. In one heavy thunder shower the lightning struck a large pitch-pine across the pond, making a very conspicuous and perfectly regular spiral groove from top to bottom, an inch or more deep, and four or five inches wide, as you would groove a walking-stick. I passed it again the other day, and was struck with awe on looking up and beholding that mark, now more distinct than ever, where a terrific and resistless bolt came down out of the harmless sky eight years ago. Men frequently say to me, “I should think you would feel lonesome down there, and want to be nearer to folks, rainy and snowy days and nights especially.” I am tempted to reply to such,—This whole earth which we inhabit is but a point in space. How far apart, think you, dwell the two most distant inhabitants of yonder star, the breadth of whose disk cannot be appreciated by our instruments? Why should I feel lonely? is not our planet in the Milky Way? This which you put seems to me not to be the most important question. What sort of space is that which separates a man from his fellows and makes him solitary? I have found that no exertion of the legs can bring two minds much nearer to one another. What do we want most to dwell near to? Not to many men surely, the depot, the post-office, the bar-room, the meeting-house, the school-house, the grocery, Beacon Hill, or the Five Points, where men most congregate, but to the perennial source of our life, whence in all our experience we have found that to issue, as the willow stands near the water and sends out its roots in that direction. This will vary with different natures, but this is the place where a wise man will dig his cellar.... I one evening overtook one of my townsmen, who has accumulated what is called “a handsome property,”—though I never got a fair view of it,—on the Walden road, driving a pair of cattle to market, who inquired of me how I could bring my mind to give up so many of the comforts of life. I answered that I was very sure I liked it passably well; I was not joking. And so I went home to my bed, and left him to pick his way through the darkness and the mud to Brighton,—or Bright-town,—which place he would reach some time in the morning.

Some of my most enjoyable hours were during the long rainstorms in spring or fall, which kept me inside all afternoon and morning, comforted by their endless roar and downpour; when an early twilight began a long evening where my thoughts had time to develop and unfold. In those relentless northeast rains that really tested the village houses, when maids stood ready with mops and buckets at the front doors to keep the flood out, I sat inside my little house, which was all entryway, and really appreciated its shelter. During one heavy thunderstorm, lightning struck a large pitch pine across the pond, leaving a very noticeable and perfectly regular spiral groove from top to bottom, an inch or more deep and four or five inches wide, just like you would groove a walking stick. I passed it again the other day and was awed to see that mark, now clearer than ever, where a powerful and unstoppable bolt came down from the seemingly harmless sky eight years ago. People often say to me, “You must feel lonely down there and want to be closer to other people, especially on rainy and snowy days and nights.” I’m tempted to respond to them—This whole earth we live on is just a tiny point in space. How far do you think the two most distant beings on that star are from each other, the width of its disk unmeasurable by our instruments? Why should I feel lonely? Is our planet not in the Milky Way? The question you’re asking doesn’t seem to me to be the most important one. What kind of distance separates a person from others and makes him feel alone? I’ve found that no amount of walking can really bring two minds closer together. What do we truly want to be near? Surely not many people—the train station, the post office, the bar, the church, the school, the grocery store, Beacon Hill, or the Five Points, where people gather most, but rather the endless source of our life, from which we’ve learned to draw, like how the willow grows near water and spreads its roots that way. This will differ for each person, but this is where a wise person will build his foundation. One evening, I ran into one of my neighbors, who has amassed what’s called “a nice property”—although I never got a clear look at it—on the Walden road, driving a pair of cattle to market, and he asked me how I could bring myself to give up so many comforts in life. I replied that I was quite sure I liked it pretty well; I wasn’t joking. So I went home to my bed and left him to find his way through the darkness and mud to Brighton—or Bright-town—which he would reach sometime in the morning.

Any prospect of awakening or coming to life to a dead man makes indifferent all times and places. The place where that may occur is always the same, and indescribably pleasant to all our senses. For the most part we allow only outlying and transient circumstances to make our occasions. They are, in fact, the cause of our distraction. Nearest to all things is that power which fashions their being. Next to us the grandest laws are continually being executed. Next to us is not the workman whom we have hired, with whom we love so well to talk, but the workman whose work we are.

Any chance of waking up or coming back to life for a dead person makes all times and places feel irrelevant. The location where that could happen is always the same, and indescribably pleasant to all our senses. Most of the time, we let only external and temporary circumstances dictate our moments. They actually distract us. Closest to everything is the force that creates their existence. Next to us, the most significant laws are constantly being applied. Next to us isn’t the worker we’ve hired, with whom we enjoy chatting, but the worker whose work we are.

“How vast and profound is the influence of the subtile powers of Heaven and of Earth!”

“How vast and deep is the influence of the subtle powers of Heaven and Earth!”

“We seek to perceive them, and we do not see them; we seek to hear them, and we do not hear them; identified with the substance of things, they cannot be separated from them.”

“We try to see them, but we can't; we try to hear them, but we don't hear them; connected to the essence of things, they can't be separated from them.”

“They cause that in all the universe men purify and sanctify their hearts, and clothe themselves in their holiday garments to offer sacrifices and oblations to their ancestors. It is an ocean of subtile intelligences. They are every where, above us, on our left, on our right; they environ us on all sides.”

“They inspire people all over the universe to cleanse and uplift their hearts, and to dress in their best clothes to make sacrifices and offerings to their ancestors. It’s a vast realm of subtle intelligences. They are everywhere—above us, to our left, to our right; they surround us on all sides.”

We are the subjects of an experiment which is not a little interesting to me. Can we not do without the society of our gossips a little while under these circumstances,—have our own thoughts to cheer us? Confucius says truly, “Virtue does not remain as an abandoned orphan; it must of necessity have neighbors.”

We are the subjects of an experiment that I find quite interesting. Can we not take a break from the company of our gossiping friends for a little while in these circumstances and enjoy our own thoughts? Confucius wisely says, “Virtue doesn’t remain as an abandoned orphan; it must have neighbors.”

With thinking we may be beside ourselves in a sane sense. By a conscious effort of the mind we can stand aloof from actions and their consequences; and all things, good and bad, go by us like a torrent. We are not wholly involved in Nature. I may be either the drift-wood in the stream, or Indra in the sky looking down on it. I may be affected by a theatrical exhibition; on the other hand, I may not be affected by an actual event which appears to concern me much more. I only know myself as a human entity; the scene, so to speak, of thoughts and affections; and am sensible of a certain doubleness by which I can stand as remote from myself as from another. However intense my experience, I am conscious of the presence and criticism of a part of me, which, as it were, is not a part of me, but spectator, sharing no experience, but taking note of it; and that is no more I than it is you. When the play, it may be the tragedy, of life is over, the spectator goes his way. It was a kind of fiction, a work of the imagination only, so far as he was concerned. This doubleness may easily make us poor neighbors and friends sometimes.

By thinking, we can find a sense of sanity amidst chaos. With focused effort, we can detach ourselves from actions and their outcomes; everything, both good and bad, rushes past us like a flood. We aren't completely caught up in Nature. I can either be the driftwood in the current or a god up in the sky observing it all. I might be moved by a play; alternatively, I might not be affected by a real event that seems to matter much more to me. I only know myself as a human being, the backdrop for thoughts and feelings; I sense a certain duality that allows me to be as distant from myself as I am from anyone else. Regardless of how powerful my experience is, I am aware of a part of myself that seems separate, like a spectator who doesn't share in the experience but simply observes it; that part is no more me than it is you. When the play, perhaps the tragedy, of life concludes, the spectator goes on his way. It was all a sort of fiction, a creation of imagination, as far as he was concerned. This duality can sometimes make us inadequate neighbors and friends.

I find it wholesome to be alone the greater part of the time. To be in company, even with the best, is soon wearisome and dissipating. I love to be alone. I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude. We are for the most part more lonely when we go abroad among men than when we stay in our chambers. A man thinking or working is always alone, let him be where he will. Solitude is not measured by the miles of space that intervene between a man and his fellows. The really diligent student in one of the crowded hives of Cambridge College is as solitary as a dervish in the desert. The farmer can work alone in the field or the woods all day, hoeing or chopping, and not feel lonesome, because he is employed; but when he comes home at night he cannot sit down in a room alone, at the mercy of his thoughts, but must be where he can “see the folks,” and recreate, and as he thinks remunerate himself for his day’s solitude; and hence he wonders how the student can sit alone in the house all night and most of the day without ennui and “the blues;” but he does not realize that the student, though in the house, is still at work in his field, and chopping in his woods, as the farmer in his, and in turn seeks the same recreation and society that the latter does, though it may be a more condensed form of it.

I find it refreshing to be alone most of the time. Even being with the best people can become exhausting and distracting. I love solitude. I've never found a companion as enjoyable as being alone. Most of the time, we feel lonelier when we're out among others than when we're in our own spaces. A person thinking or working is always alone, no matter where they are. Solitude isn't about the distance between a person and others. A dedicated student at a busy college like Cambridge can feel just as isolated as someone in the desert. A farmer can spend all day working alone in the fields or woods, hoeing or chopping, and not feel lonely because he's busy. But when he gets home at night, he can't just sit alone in a room with his thoughts; he needs to be around people to unwind and feel compensated for his day’s solitude. That's why he wonders how the student can spend all night and most of the day alone without feeling bored or down. He doesn’t realize that even though the student is at home, he is still working in his own field and chopping in his own woods, just like the farmer, and he seeks the same kind of relaxation and company, although it might take a different form.

Society is commonly too cheap. We meet at very short intervals, not having had time to acquire any new value for each other. We meet at meals three times a day, and give each other a new taste of that old musty cheese that we are. We have had to agree on a certain set of rules, called etiquette and politeness, to make this frequent meeting tolerable and that we need not come to open war. We meet at the post-office, and at the sociable, and about the fireside every night; we live thick and are in each other’s way, and stumble over one another, and I think that we thus lose some respect for one another. Certainly less frequency would suffice for all important and hearty communications. Consider the girls in a factory,—never alone, hardly in their dreams. It would be better if there were but one inhabitant to a square mile, as where I live. The value of a man is not in his skin, that we should touch him.

Society is often too superficial. We meet so often that we don’t have time to develop any new appreciation for each other. We gather for meals three times a day, and we’re reminded of the same old stale dynamics we have. We’ve had to agree on a certain set of rules, known as etiquette and politeness, to make these frequent meetings bearable and to avoid open conflict. We see each other at the post office, at social gatherings, and around the fireplace every night; we live close together and get in each other's way, which makes us stumble over one another, and I think this causes us to lose some respect for each other. Honestly, less frequent interactions would be enough for all important and meaningful conversations. Think about the girls in a factory—never alone, barely even in their dreams. It might be better if there were only one person per square mile, like where I live. The value of a person isn't in their appearance, so there’s no need to make physical contact.

I have heard of a man lost in the woods and dying of famine and exhaustion at the foot of a tree, whose loneliness was relieved by the grotesque visions with which, owing to bodily weakness, his diseased imagination surrounded him, and which he believed to be real. So also, owing to bodily and mental health and strength, we may be continually cheered by a like but more normal and natural society, and come to know that we are never alone.

I’ve heard about a man who was lost in the woods and dying from hunger and exhaustion at the base of a tree. His loneliness was eased by the bizarre visions that, because of his physical weakness, his troubled mind created, and he thought they were real. Similarly, thanks to our physical and mental well-being, we can constantly be uplifted by a more normal and natural society, realizing that we are never truly alone.

I have a great deal of company in my house; especially in the morning, when nobody calls. Let me suggest a few comparisons, that some one may convey an idea of my situation. I am no more lonely than the loon in the pond that laughs so loud, or than Walden Pond itself. What company has that lonely lake, I pray? And yet it has not the blue devils, but the blue angels in it, in the azure tint of its waters. The sun is alone, except in thick weather, when there sometimes appear to be two, but one is a mock sun. God is alone,—but the devil, he is far from being alone; he sees a great deal of company; he is legion. I am no more lonely than a single mullein or dandelion in a pasture, or a bean leaf, or sorrel, or a horse-fly, or a bumble-bee. I am no more lonely than the Mill Brook, or a weathercock, or the north star, or the south wind, or an April shower, or a January thaw, or the first spider in a new house.

I have a lot of company in my house, especially in the morning, when no one calls. Let me offer a few comparisons to give you an idea of my situation. I’m not any lonelier than the loon in the pond that laughs so loud, or than Walden Pond itself. What company does that lonely lake have, I ask? And yet it doesn’t have the blues, but rather the beautiful hues in the clear blue of its waters. The sun is alone, except on cloudy days when there sometimes seems to be two suns, but one is just a fake sun. God is alone—but the devil is definitely not alone; he has a lot of company; he is many. I’m not any lonelier than a single mullein or dandelion in a pasture, or a bean leaf, or sorrel, or a horse-fly, or a bumblebee. I’m not any lonelier than the Mill Brook, or a weather vane, or the north star, or the south wind, or an April shower, or a January thaw, or the first spider in a new house.

I have occasional visits in the long winter evenings, when the snow falls fast and the wind howls in the wood, from an old settler and original proprietor, who is reported to have dug Walden Pond, and stoned it, and fringed it with pine woods; who tells me stories of old time and of new eternity; and between us we manage to pass a cheerful evening with social mirth and pleasant views of things, even without apples or cider,—a most wise and humorous friend, whom I love much, who keeps himself more secret than ever did Goffe or Whalley; and though he is thought to be dead, none can show where he is buried. An elderly dame, too, dwells in my neighborhood, invisible to most persons, in whose odorous herb garden I love to stroll sometimes, gathering simples and listening to her fables; for she has a genius of unequalled fertility, and her memory runs back farther than mythology, and she can tell me the original of every fable, and on what fact every one is founded, for the incidents occurred when she was young. A ruddy and lusty old dame, who delights in all weathers and seasons, and is likely to outlive all her children yet.

I occasionally have visits on long winter evenings when the snow falls heavily and the wind howls through the woods, from an old settler and original owner, who’s said to have dug Walden Pond, lined it with stones, and surrounded it with pine trees; he shares stories of the past and thoughts about eternity; together, we manage to enjoy a cheerful evening filled with laughter and interesting perspectives, even without apples or cider—a wise and humorous friend whom I care for deeply, who keeps himself more secret than anyone ever did, and even though people think he’s dead, no one can show where he’s buried. There’s also an elderly lady living nearby, invisible to most, in whose fragrant herb garden I love to wander sometimes, collecting plants and listening to her tales; she has an incredible imagination and memories that go back further than mythology, and she can tell me the origin of every fable and the real events behind each one, as they happened when she was young. She’s a hearty, lively old lady who enjoys all weather and seasons and is likely to outlive all her children.

The indescribable innocence and beneficence of Nature,—of sun and wind and rain, of summer and winter,—such health, such cheer, they afford forever! and such sympathy have they ever with our race, that all Nature would be affected, and the sun’s brightness fade, and the winds would sigh humanely, and the clouds rain tears, and the woods shed their leaves and put on mourning in midsummer, if any man should ever for a just cause grieve. Shall I not have intelligence with the earth? Am I not partly leaves and vegetable mould myself?

The incredible innocence and kindness of Nature—of the sun, wind, and rain, of summer and winter—brings such health and happiness that lasts forever! Nature has always had such a connection with our species that if any person were to grieve for a good reason, the entire world would feel it. The sun would lose its brightness, the winds would sigh with sympathy, the clouds would rain tears, and the trees would shed their leaves and dress in mourning in the middle of summer. Shouldn’t I be in touch with the earth? Am I not partly made of leaves and soil myself?

What is the pill which will keep us well, serene, contented? Not my or thy great-grandfather’s, but our great-grandmother Nature’s universal, vegetable, botanic medicines, by which she has kept herself young always, outlived so many old Parrs in her day, and fed her health with their decaying fatness. For my panacea, instead of one of those quack vials of a mixture dipped from Acheron and the Dead Sea, which come out of those long shallow black-schooner looking wagons which we sometimes see made to carry bottles, let me have a draught of undiluted morning air. Morning air! If men will not drink of this at the fountain-head of the day, why, then, we must even bottle up some and sell it in the shops, for the benefit of those who have lost their subscription ticket to morning time in this world. But remember, it will not keep quite till noon-day even in the coolest cellar, but drive out the stopples long ere that and follow westward the steps of Aurora. I am no worshipper of Hygeia, who was the daughter of that old herb-doctor Æsculapius, and who is represented on monuments holding a serpent in one hand, and in the other a cup out of which the serpent sometimes drinks; but rather of Hebe, cupbearer to Jupiter, who was the daughter of Juno and wild lettuce, and who had the power of restoring gods and men to the vigor of youth. She was probably the only thoroughly sound-conditioned, healthy, and robust young lady that ever walked the globe, and wherever she came it was spring.

What is the remedy that will keep us healthy, calm, and satisfied? Not the ones from our great-grandfathers, but our great-grandmother Nature’s universal, plant-based medicines, which have kept her forever youthful, outlived many old souls in her time, and nourished her health with their decaying richness. Instead of one of those fake potions that come from those long, shallow, black wagons we sometimes see transporting bottles, give me a sip of pure morning air. Morning air! If people won’t drink it straight from the source at the start of the day, then we must bottle some up and sell it in stores for those who have lost their chance to experience mornings in this world. But remember, it won’t last until noon, even in the coolest cellar; it will escape long before that and follow the sun westward. I’m not a devotee of Hygeia, the daughter of that old herbal doctor Æsculapius, who is shown holding a serpent in one hand and a cup from which the serpent sometimes drinks in the other. I’d rather worship Hebe, the cupbearer to Jupiter, who was the daughter of Juno and wild lettuce, who had the ability to restore gods and humans to their youthful vigor. She was probably the only truly healthy and vigorous young woman to ever walk the earth, and wherever she went, it was always spring.

Visitors

I think that I love society as much as most, and am ready enough to fasten myself like a bloodsucker for the time to any full-blooded man that comes in my way. I am naturally no hermit, but might possibly sit out the sturdiest frequenter of the bar-room, if my business called me thither.

I believe I love society just as much as anyone else and I'm more than willing to attach myself like a leech to any confident person who crosses my path. I'm not really a hermit, but I could easily hang out with the toughest regular at the bar if my work brought me there.

I had three chairs in my house; one for solitude, two for friendship, three for society. When visitors came in larger and unexpected numbers there was but the third chair for them all, but they generally economized the room by standing up. It is surprising how many great men and women a small house will contain. I have had twenty-five or thirty souls, with their bodies, at once under my roof, and yet we often parted without being aware that we had come very near to one another. Many of our houses, both public and private, with their almost innumerable apartments, their huge halls and their cellars for the storage of wines and other munitions of peace, appear to me extravagantly large for their inhabitants. They are so vast and magnificent that the latter seem to be only vermin which infest them. I am surprised when the herald blows his summons before some Tremont or Astor or Middlesex House, to see come creeping out over the piazza for all inhabitants a ridiculous mouse, which soon again slinks into some hole in the pavement.

I had three chairs in my house: one for solitude, two for friendship, and three for socializing. When guests showed up in larger and unexpected numbers, there was only the third chair for all of them, but they usually saved space by standing. It's surprising how many remarkable people a small house can hold. I've had twenty-five or thirty individuals, along with their bodies, under my roof at once, and yet we often left without realizing how close we had come to each other. Many of our buildings, both public and private, with their almost countless rooms, huge halls, and cellars for storing wine and other peaceful supplies, seem excessively large for the people who live in them. They are so vast and grand that the occupants seem like pests in comparison. I'm always taken aback when the announcer blows his horn in front of some Tremont or Astor or Middlesex House and a tiny mouse comes creeping out for all the residents, only to quickly disappear back into a hole in the pavement.

One inconvenience I sometimes experienced in so small a house, the difficulty of getting to a sufficient distance from my guest when we began to utter the big thoughts in big words. You want room for your thoughts to get into sailing trim and run a course or two before they make their port. The bullet of your thought must have overcome its lateral and ricochet motion and fallen into its last and steady course before it reaches the ear of the hearer, else it may plough out again through the side of his head. Also, our sentences wanted room to unfold and form their columns in the interval. Individuals, like nations, must have suitable broad and natural boundaries, even a considerable neutral ground, between them. I have found it a singular luxury to talk across the pond to a companion on the opposite side. In my house we were so near that we could not begin to hear,—we could not speak low enough to be heard; as when you throw two stones into calm water so near that they break each other’s undulations. If we are merely loquacious and loud talkers, then we can afford to stand very near together, cheek by jowl, and feel each other’s breath; but if we speak reservedly and thoughtfully, we want to be farther apart, that all animal heat and moisture may have a chance to evaporate. If we would enjoy the most intimate society with that in each of us which is without, or above, being spoken to, we must not only be silent, but commonly so far apart bodily that we cannot possibly hear each other’s voice in any case. Referred to this standard, speech is for the convenience of those who are hard of hearing; but there are many fine things which we cannot say if we have to shout. As the conversation began to assume a loftier and grander tone, we gradually shoved our chairs farther apart till they touched the wall in opposite corners, and then commonly there was not room enough.

One issue I sometimes faced in such a small house was the challenge of creating enough distance from my guest when we started to express our big ideas in big words. You need space for your thoughts to settle into a clear direction and take a few turns before they reach their destination. The essence of your thought needs to have settled down and found its steady path before it’s heard, or it might just bounce off and come back out. Plus, our sentences needed space to expand and develop fully in the meantime. Individuals, like nations, require suitable borders and even a decent amount of neutral space between them. I’ve found it quite a luxury to talk to someone across the pond. In my house, we were so close that we couldn’t start to hear each other—we couldn’t speak quietly enough; it was like tossing two stones into calm water so close together that they disrupt each other’s ripples. If we’re just loud, chattering talkers, we can stand shoulder to shoulder and feel each other’s breath; but if we talk with more reserve and thoughtfulness, we need to be farther apart so that all the heat and moisture can dissipate. To truly enjoy the most intimate connection with what’s deep inside us, away from spoken words, we need not just silence but enough physical distance that we can’t hear each other’s voices at all. By this measure, speech is just for those who struggle to hear; many beautiful things remain unexpressed if we have to shout them. As our conversation began to take on a more elevated tone, we gradually pushed our chairs further apart until they were against the walls in opposite corners, and even then, there often wasn’t enough space.

My “best” room, however, my withdrawing room, always ready for company, on whose carpet the sun rarely fell, was the pine wood behind my house. Thither in summer days, when distinguished guests came, I took them, and a priceless domestic swept the floor and dusted the furniture and kept the things in order.

My favorite room, the one I used for relaxing, was always ready for visitors. The sun hardly ever reached its carpet, and it was actually the pine wood behind my house. During the summer, when special guests arrived, I brought them there, and a wonderful housekeeper would clean the floor, dust the furniture, and keep everything tidy.

If one guest came he sometimes partook of my frugal meal, and it was no interruption to conversation to be stirring a hasty-pudding, or watching the rising and maturing of a loaf of bread in the ashes, in the mean while. But if twenty came and sat in my house there was nothing said about dinner, though there might be bread enough for two, more than if eating were a forsaken habit; but we naturally practised abstinence; and this was never felt to be an offence against hospitality, but the most proper and considerate course. The waste and decay of physical life, which so often needs repair, seemed miraculously retarded in such a case, and the vital vigor stood its ground. I could entertain thus a thousand as well as twenty; and if any ever went away disappointed or hungry from my house when they found me at home, they may depend upon it that I sympathized with them at least. So easy is it, though many housekeepers doubt it, to establish new and better customs in the place of the old. You need not rest your reputation on the dinners you give. For my own part, I was never so effectually deterred from frequenting a man’s house, by any kind of Cerberus whatever, as by the parade one made about dining me, which I took to be a very polite and roundabout hint never to trouble him so again. I think I shall never revisit those scenes. I should be proud to have for the motto of my cabin those lines of Spenser which one of my visitors inscribed on a yellow walnut leaf for a card:—

If one guest came over, he sometimes shared in my simple meal, and cooking a hasty pudding or watching a loaf of bread rise in the ashes didn’t interrupt our conversation. But if twenty people showed up and filled my house, there was no mention of dinner, even though there might be enough bread for two, more than if eating wasn't a common thing; we naturally practiced restraint, and this never felt like a lack of hospitality but rather the most considerate approach. The decline and decay of physical life, which often needs fixing, seemed miraculously slowed in such a case, and our vitality held strong. I could entertain a thousand just as easily as twenty; if anyone ever left my house disappointed or hungry when they found me home, they can be sure I felt for them. It’s surprisingly easy, although many homeowners doubt it, to create new and better traditions in place of the old. You don’t have to base your reputation on the dinners you host. Personally, I’ve been more effectively discouraged from visiting someone’s house by any kind of guard dog than by the fuss they made about feeding me, which I took as a very polite way of saying I shouldn't bother him again. I don't think I’ll revisit those days. I would be proud to have the motto of my cabin be those lines from Spenser that one of my visitors wrote on a yellow walnut leaf as a card:—

“Arrivéd there, the little house they fill,
    Ne looke for entertainment where none was;
Rest is their feast, and all things at their will:
    The noblest mind the best contentment has.”

“Arrived there, the little house they fill,
    They look for entertainment where there’s none;
Rest is their feast, and everything is at their will:
    The greatest mind finds the best contentment.”

When Winslow, afterward governor of the Plymouth Colony, went with a companion on a visit of ceremony to Massasoit on foot through the woods, and arrived tired and hungry at his lodge, they were well received by the king, but nothing was said about eating that day. When the night arrived, to quote their own words,—“He laid us on the bed with himself and his wife, they at the one end and we at the other, it being only planks laid a foot from the ground, and a thin mat upon them. Two more of his chief men, for want of room, pressed by and upon us; so that we were worse weary of our lodging than of our journey.” At one o’clock the next day Massasoit “brought two fishes that he had shot,” about thrice as big as a bream; “these being boiled, there were at least forty looked for a share in them. The most ate of them. This meal only we had in two nights and a day; and had not one of us bought a partridge, we had taken our journey fasting.” Fearing that they would be light-headed for want of food and also sleep, owing to “the savages’ barbarous singing, (for they used to sing themselves asleep,)” and that they might get home while they had strength to travel, they departed. As for lodging, it is true they were but poorly entertained, though what they found an inconvenience was no doubt intended for an honor; but as far as eating was concerned, I do not see how the Indians could have done better. They had nothing to eat themselves, and they were wiser than to think that apologies could supply the place of food to their guests; so they drew their belts tighter and said nothing about it. Another time when Winslow visited them, it being a season of plenty with them, there was no deficiency in this respect.

When Winslow, who later became the governor of the Plymouth Colony, visited Massasoit with a friend, they walked through the woods and arrived at his lodge feeling tired and hungry. The king welcomed them warmly, but no one mentioned food that day. When night fell, they described it as, “He laid us on the bed with himself and his wife, they at one end and we at the other, with only planks a foot off the ground and a thin mat on top. Two of his chief men squeezed in close to us, making us more uncomfortable with our sleeping situation than with our journey.” The next day at one o’clock, Massasoit “brought two fish that he had caught,” which were about three times the size of a bream; “after they were boiled, at least forty people were expected to share them. Most of them ate. This was the only meal we had in two nights and a day; and if none of us had bought a partridge, we would have gone home hungry.” They worried that the lack of food and sleep, due to “the savages’ barbarous singing, (as they used to sing themselves to sleep),” would leave them too weak to travel home, so they decided to leave. As for their lodging, it’s true that it wasn’t very comfortable, though any inconvenience they felt was likely meant as a gesture of honor; but regarding food, I don’t see how the Indians could have done better. They had nothing to eat themselves, and they were smart enough to realize that apologies wouldn’t fill the stomachs of their guests, so they tightened their belts and said nothing about it. The next time Winslow visited, it was a season of plenty for them, and there was no shortage of food.

As for men, they will hardly fail one any where. I had more visitors while I lived in the woods than at any other period in my life; I mean that I had some. I met several there under more favorable circumstances than I could any where else. But fewer came to see me on trivial business. In this respect, my company was winnowed by my mere distance from town. I had withdrawn so far within the great ocean of solitude, into which the rivers of society empty, that for the most part, so far as my needs were concerned, only the finest sediment was deposited around me. Beside, there were wafted to me evidences of unexplored and uncultivated continents on the other side.

As for men, they’re unlikely to fail you anywhere. I had more visitors while I lived in the woods than at any other time in my life; I mean that I actually had some. I met several folks there under better circumstances than I could anywhere else. But fewer people stopped by for trivial reasons. Because of my distance from town, the company I did have was filtered down. I had retreated so deeply into the vast ocean of solitude, where the rivers of society flow, that for the most part, regarding my needs, only the best people were left around me. Plus, I received signs of unexplored and uncultivated lands on the other side.

Who should come to my lodge this morning but a true Homeric or Paphlagonian man,—he had so suitable and poetic a name that I am sorry I cannot print it here,—a Canadian, a woodchopper and post-maker, who can hole fifty posts in a day, who made his last supper on a woodchuck which his dog caught. He, too, has heard of Homer, and, “if it were not for books,” would “not know what to do rainy days,” though perhaps he has not read one wholly through for many rainy seasons. Some priest who could pronounce the Greek itself taught him to read his verse in the testament in his native parish far away; and now I must translate to him, while he holds the book, Achilles’ reproof to Patroclus for his sad countenance.—“Why are you in tears, Patroclus, like a young girl?”—

Who shows up at my lodge this morning but a real Homeric or Paphlagonian guy—he had such a fitting and poetic name that I wish I could share it here—a Canadian, a woodchopper and post-maker, who can dig out fifty posts in a day and had a woodchuck for dinner that his dog caught. He’s also heard of Homer, and “if it weren’t for books,” he wouldn’t “know what to do on rainy days,” even though he probably hasn’t read one all the way through for many rainy seasons. Some priest who could actually pronounce the Greek taught him to read his verses in the New Testament back in his distant hometown; and now I have to translate for him, while he holds the book, Achilles’ scolding of Patroclus for his sad face.—“Why are you crying, Patroclus, like a young girl?”—

“Or have you alone heard some news from Phthia?
They say that Menœtius lives yet, son of Actor,
And Peleus lives, son of Æacus, among the Myrmidons,
Either of whom having died, we should greatly grieve.”

“Have you heard any news from Phthia?
They say that Menœtius is still alive, son of Actor,
And Peleus is alive, son of Æacus, among the Myrmidons,
If either of them had died, we would be deeply saddened.”

He says, “That’s good.” He has a great bundle of white-oak bark under his arm for a sick man, gathered this Sunday morning. “I suppose there’s no harm in going after such a thing to-day,” says he. To him Homer was a great writer, though what his writing was about he did not know. A more simple and natural man it would be hard to find. Vice and disease, which cast such a sombre moral hue over the world, seemed to have hardly any existence for him. He was about twenty-eight years old, and had left Canada and his father’s house a dozen years before to work in the States, and earn money to buy a farm with at last, perhaps in his native country. He was cast in the coarsest mould; a stout but sluggish body, yet gracefully carried, with a thick sunburnt neck, dark bushy hair, and dull sleepy blue eyes, which were occasionally lit up with expression. He wore a flat gray cloth cap, a dingy wool-colored greatcoat, and cowhide boots. He was a great consumer of meat, usually carrying his dinner to his work a couple of miles past my house,—for he chopped all summer,—in a tin pail; cold meats, often cold woodchucks, and coffee in a stone bottle which dangled by a string from his belt; and sometimes he offered me a drink. He came along early, crossing my bean-field, though without anxiety or haste to get to his work, such as Yankees exhibit. He wasn’t a-going to hurt himself. He didn’t care if he only earned his board. Frequently he would leave his dinner in the bushes, when his dog had caught a woodchuck by the way, and go back a mile and a half to dress it and leave it in the cellar of the house where he boarded, after deliberating first for half an hour whether he could not sink it in the pond safely till nightfall,—loving to dwell long upon these themes. He would say, as he went by in the morning, “How thick the pigeons are! If working every day were not my trade, I could get all the meat I should want by hunting,—pigeons, woodchucks, rabbits, partridges,—by gosh! I could get all I should want for a week in one day.”

He says, “That’s good.” He has a big bundle of white-oak bark under his arm for a sick man, gathered this Sunday morning. “I guess there’s no harm in going after something like that today,” he says. To him, Homer was a great writer, even though he didn’t know what his writing was about. It would be hard to find a more straightforward and genuine man. Vice and sickness, which cast such a gloomy moral shadow over the world, hardly seemed to exist for him. He was around twenty-eight years old and had left Canada and his father’s house a dozen years earlier to work in the States and earn money to eventually buy a farm back home, maybe in his native country. He was built in the coarsest way; a stout but sluggish body, yet carried with grace, with a thick sunburnt neck, dark bushy hair, and dull, sleepy blue eyes that were sometimes lit up with expression. He wore a flat gray cloth cap, a dirty wool-colored greatcoat, and cowhide boots. He was a big eater of meat, usually taking his lunch to work a couple of miles past my house—because he chopped all summer—in a tin pail; cold meats, often cold woodchucks, and coffee in a stone bottle that hung by a string from his belt; and sometimes he offered me a drink. He came by early, crossing my bean field, without the anxiety or rush to get to work that Yankees often show. He wasn’t about to hurt himself. He didn’t care if he only earned enough to cover his board. Often, he would leave his lunch in the bushes if his dog caught a woodchuck along the way and head back a mile and a half to prepare it and leave it in the cellar of the house where he boarded, after thinking for half an hour about whether he could safely sink it in the pond until nightfall—he enjoyed mulling over these kinds of things. As he passed by in the morning, he would say, “Look how thick the pigeons are! If working every day wasn’t my job, I could get all the meat I wanted by hunting—pigeons, woodchucks, rabbits, partridges—By gosh! I could get all I needed for a week in just one day.”

He was a skilful chopper, and indulged in some flourishes and ornaments in his art. He cut his trees level and close to the ground, that the sprouts which came up afterward might be more vigorous and a sled might slide over the stumps; and instead of leaving a whole tree to support his corded wood, he would pare it away to a slender stake or splinter which you could break off with your hand at last.

He was a skilled woodcutter and enjoyed showing off some fancy techniques in his work. He cut his trees low to the ground so that the new shoots that grew back would be healthier, and so a sled could glide over the stumps. Instead of leaving a whole tree to hold up his stacked wood, he would trim it down to a thin stake or splinter that you could easily break off by hand in the end.

He interested me because he was so quiet and solitary and so happy withal; a well of good humor and contentment which overflowed at his eyes. His mirth was without alloy. Sometimes I saw him at his work in the woods, felling trees, and he would greet me with a laugh of inexpressible satisfaction, and a salutation in Canadian French, though he spoke English as well. When I approached him he would suspend his work, and with half-suppressed mirth lie along the trunk of a pine which he had felled, and, peeling off the inner bark, roll it up into a ball and chew it while he laughed and talked. Such an exuberance of animal spirits had he that he sometimes tumbled down and rolled on the ground with laughter at any thing which made him think and tickled him. Looking round upon the trees he would exclaim,—“By George! I can enjoy myself well enough here chopping; I want no better sport.” Sometimes, when at leisure, he amused himself all day in the woods with a pocket pistol, firing salutes to himself at regular intervals as he walked. In the winter he had a fire by which at noon he warmed his coffee in a kettle; and as he sat on a log to eat his dinner the chickadees would sometimes come round and alight on his arm and peck at the potato in his fingers; and he said that he “liked to have the little fellers about him.”

He caught my attention because he was so quiet and solitary, yet so genuinely happy; he was a wellspring of good humor and contentment that showed in his eyes. His laughter was pure and untainted. Sometimes I would see him working in the woods, chopping down trees, and he would greet me with an infectious laugh of true satisfaction, along with a greeting in Canadian French, even though he spoke English too. When I approached, he would pause his work and, with barely contained laughter, lie across the trunk of a pine he had just cut, peeling off the inner bark, rolling it into a ball, and chewing on it while he laughed and chatted. He was so full of energy that sometimes he would fall down and roll on the ground with laughter at anything that amused him. Looking around at the trees, he would exclaim, "By George! I can have a great time here chopping; I want no better fun." Sometimes, when he had some free time, he would spend the whole day in the woods with a pocket pistol, firing off playful salutes at regular intervals as he walked. In the winter, he would have a fire where he warmed his coffee in a kettle at noon, and as he sat on a log eating his lunch, the chickadees would sometimes come around, landing on his arm and pecking at the potato in his fingers; he said he “liked having the little fellers around him.”

In him the animal man chiefly was developed. In physical endurance and contentment he was cousin to the pine and the rock. I asked him once if he was not sometimes tired at night, after working all day; and he answered, with a sincere and serious look, “Gorrappit, I never was tired in my life.” But the intellectual and what is called spiritual man in him were slumbering as in an infant. He had been instructed only in that innocent and ineffectual way in which the Catholic priests teach the aborigines, by which the pupil is never educated to the degree of consciousness, but only to the degree of trust and reverence, and a child is not made a man, but kept a child. When Nature made him, she gave him a strong body and contentment for his portion, and propped him on every side with reverence and reliance, that he might live out his threescore years and ten a child. He was so genuine and unsophisticated that no introduction would serve to introduce him, more than if you introduced a woodchuck to your neighbor. He had got to find him out as you did. He would not play any part. Men paid him wages for work, and so helped to feed and clothe him; but he never exchanged opinions with them. He was so simply and naturally humble—if he can be called humble who never aspires—that humility was no distinct quality in him, nor could he conceive of it. Wiser men were demigods to him. If you told him that such a one was coming, he did as if he thought that any thing so grand would expect nothing of himself, but take all the responsibility on itself, and let him be forgotten still. He never heard the sound of praise. He particularly reverenced the writer and the preacher. Their performances were miracles. When I told him that I wrote considerably, he thought for a long time that it was merely the handwriting which I meant, for he could write a remarkably good hand himself. I sometimes found the name of his native parish handsomely written in the snow by the highway, with the proper French accent, and knew that he had passed. I asked him if he ever wished to write his thoughts. He said that he had read and written letters for those who could not, but he never tried to write thoughts,—no, he could not, he could not tell what to put first, it would kill him, and then there was spelling to be attended to at the same time!

In him, the animal side was primarily developed. In terms of physical endurance and contentment, he was like a pine tree or a rock. I once asked him if he ever felt tired at night after working all day, and he replied, with a genuine and serious expression, “Gorrappit, I’ve never been tired in my life.” But the intellectual and what we call spiritual side within him was asleep like an infant. He had been taught in the innocent and ineffective way that Catholic priests often instruct indigenous people, where students are never educated to a level of awareness, but only to a level of trust and reverence, keeping a child as a child rather than teaching them to grow into adulthood. When Nature created him, she gave him a strong body and contentment as his share, surrounding him with reverence and reliability so he could live out his life as a child for seventy years. He was so genuine and unpretentious that no introduction could serve to introduce him any better than introducing a woodchuck to your neighbor. He had to be discovered the same way you did. He wouldn’t play any role. Men paid him wages for his work, which helped feed and clothe him; but he never exchanged opinions with them. He was so simply and naturally humble—if he can be called humble since he never aspired—that humility was not a distinct quality in him, nor could he even comprehend it. Wiser men seemed like demigods to him. If you told him that someone important was coming, he thought that someone so grand wouldn’t expect anything from him but would take all the responsibility upon themselves and let him be forgotten. He never heard the sound of praise. He especially held writers and preachers in high regard. Their work seemed miraculous to him. When I told him that I wrote quite a bit, he thought for a long time that I simply meant I had good handwriting, because he could write very well himself. Sometimes I would find the name of his hometown beautifully written in the snow beside the road, complete with the correct French accent, and knew that he had passed by. I asked him if he ever wanted to write down his thoughts. He said he had read and written letters for those who couldn’t, but he never tried to write down his thoughts—no, he couldn’t; he didn’t even know where to start, it would overwhelm him, and then there was the spelling to think about at the same time!

I heard that a distinguished wise man and reformer asked him if he did not want the world to be changed; but he answered with a chuckle of surprise in his Canadian accent, not knowing that the question had ever been entertained before, “No, I like it well enough.” It would have suggested many things to a philosopher to have dealings with him. To a stranger he appeared to know nothing of things in general; yet I sometimes saw in him a man whom I had not seen before, and I did not know whether he was as wise as Shakespeare or as simply ignorant as a child, whether to suspect him of a fine poetic consciousness or of stupidity. A townsman told me that when he met him sauntering through the village in his small close-fitting cap, and whistling to himself, he reminded him of a prince in disguise.

I heard that a notable wise man and reformer asked him if he wanted to see the world changed; but he answered with a surprised chuckle in his Canadian accent, not realizing that the question had ever been considered before, “No, I like it just fine.” It would have suggested many things to a philosopher to interact with him. To a stranger, he seemed to know nothing about much at all; yet sometimes I saw in him a person I hadn't encountered before, and I couldn’t tell if he was as wise as Shakespeare or just as clueless as a child, whether to see him as having a fine poetic awareness or simply being stupid. A local told me that when he saw him strolling through the village in his snug little cap, whistling to himself, he reminded him of a prince in disguise.

His only books were an almanac and an arithmetic, in which last he was considerably expert. The former was a sort of cyclopædia to him, which he supposed to contain an abstract of human knowledge, as indeed it does to a considerable extent. I loved to sound him on the various reforms of the day, and he never failed to look at them in the most simple and practical light. He had never heard of such things before. Could he do without factories? I asked. He had worn the home-made Vermont gray, he said, and that was good. Could he dispense with tea and coffee? Did this country afford any beverage beside water? He had soaked hemlock leaves in water and drank it, and thought that was better than water in warm weather. When I asked him if he could do without money, he showed the convenience of money in such a way as to suggest and coincide with the most philosophical accounts of the origin of this institution, and the very derivation of the word pecunia. If an ox were his property, and he wished to get needles and thread at the store, he thought it would be inconvenient and impossible soon to go on mortgaging some portion of the creature each time to that amount. He could defend many institutions better than any philosopher, because, in describing them as they concerned him, he gave the true reason for their prevalence, and speculation had not suggested to him any other. At another time, hearing Plato’s definition of a man,—a biped without feathers,—and that one exhibited a cock plucked and called it Plato’s man, he thought it an important difference that the knees bent the wrong way. He would sometimes exclaim, “How I love to talk! By George, I could talk all day!” I asked him once, when I had not seen him for many months, if he had got a new idea this summer. “Good Lord,” said he, “a man that has to work as I do, if he does not forget the ideas he has had, he will do well. May be the man you hoe with is inclined to race; then, by gorry, your mind must be there; you think of weeds.” He would sometimes ask me first on such occasions, if I had made any improvement. One winter day I asked him if he was always satisfied with himself, wishing to suggest a substitute within him for the priest without, and some higher motive for living. “Satisfied!” said he; “some men are satisfied with one thing, and some with another. One man, perhaps, if he has got enough, will be satisfied to sit all day with his back to the fire and his belly to the table, by George!” Yet I never, by any manœuvring, could get him to take the spiritual view of things; the highest that he appeared to conceive of was a simple expediency, such as you might expect an animal to appreciate; and this, practically, is true of most men. If I suggested any improvement in his mode of life, he merely answered, without expressing any regret, that it was too late. Yet he thoroughly believed in honesty and the like virtues.

His only books were an almanac and a math book, in which he was quite skilled. The almanac served as a kind of encyclopedia for him, which he thought summarized human knowledge, and to a large extent, it does. I loved to discuss the various reforms of the day with him, and he always approached them in the simplest and most practical way. He had never heard of such things before. Could he live without factories? I asked. He had worn the homemade Vermont gray, he said, and that was fine. Could he give up tea and coffee? Did this country have any drinks besides water? He had steeped hemlock leaves in water and drank it, claiming it was better than water in warmer weather. When I asked him if he could live without money, he explained the usefulness of money in a way that aligned with the most philosophical ideas about its origins, including the very meaning of the word pecunia. If he owned an ox and wanted to buy needles and thread at the store, he thought it would be impractical and impossible to keep mortgaging part of the animal each time to get the amount he needed. He could defend many institutions better than any philosopher because, in describing them as they affected him, he provided the true reason for their existence, and speculation hadn’t led him to think otherwise. At another moment, after hearing Plato's definition of a man—a two-legged creature without feathers—and seeing someone show a plucked chicken and call it Plato's man, he pointed out that it was an important difference that the knees bent the wrong way. He would sometimes exclaim, “How I love to talk! By George, I could talk all day!” I asked him once, after not seeing him for several months, if he had come up with any new ideas that summer. “Good Lord,” he replied, “a man like me, who has to work the way I do, if he doesn’t forget the ideas he already has, he’s doing well. Maybe the guy you’re working with is into racing; then, by golly, your mind has to be there—you’re thinking about weeds.” He would sometimes ask me if I had made any improvements. One winter day, I asked him if he was always satisfied with himself, hoping to suggest a deeper motive for living rather than relying on external validation. “Satisfied!” he said; “some guys are satisfied with one thing, and some with another. One guy, maybe, if he has enough, will be happy to sit all day with his back to the fire and his belly to the table, by George!” Yet I could never get him to take a spiritual view of things; the highest he seemed to grasp was a simple practicality, similar to what you might expect an animal to understand; and practically, this is true of most people. If I suggested any improvements in his lifestyle, he just replied, without any regret, that it was too late. Yet he truly believed in honesty and similar virtues.

There was a certain positive originality, however slight, to be detected in him, and I occasionally observed that he was thinking for himself and expressing his own opinion, a phenomenon so rare that I would any day walk ten miles to observe it, and it amounted to the re-origination of many of the institutions of society. Though he hesitated, and perhaps failed to express himself distinctly, he always had a presentable thought behind. Yet his thinking was so primitive and immersed in his animal life, that, though more promising than a merely learned man’s, it rarely ripened to any thing which can be reported. He suggested that there might be men of genius in the lowest grades of life, however permanently humble and illiterate, who take their own view always, or do not pretend to see at all; who are as bottomless even as Walden Pond was thought to be, though they may be dark and muddy.

There was a certain positive originality, however slight, that I could see in him, and I occasionally noticed that he was thinking for himself and sharing his own opinions—a rarity so extraordinary that I would gladly walk ten miles just to witness it. This was essentially a rethinking of many societal institutions. Though he hesitated and sometimes struggled to express himself clearly, he always had a worthwhile thought behind it. Yet, his thinking was so basic and consumed by his instinctual life that, while it was more promising than that of someone who was only knowledgeable, it rarely developed into anything substantial. He suggested that there might be individuals with genius among the lowest levels of society, no matter how permanently humble and uneducated they may be, who always have their own perspective or, at the very least, don’t pretend to see anything at all; they are as deep as Walden Pond was believed to be, even if they seem dark and murky.

Many a traveller came out of his way to see me and the inside of my house, and, as an excuse for calling, asked for a glass of water. I told them that I drank at the pond, and pointed thither, offering to lend them a dipper. Far off as I lived, I was not exempted from the annual visitation which occurs, methinks, about the first of April, when every body is on the move; and I had my share of good luck, though there were some curious specimens among my visitors. Half-witted men from the almshouse and elsewhere came to see me; but I endeavored to make them exercise all the wit they had, and make their confessions to me; in such cases making wit the theme of our conversation; and so was compensated. Indeed, I found some of them to be wiser than the so called overseers of the poor and selectmen of the town, and thought it was time that the tables were turned. With respect to wit, I learned that there was not much difference between the half and the whole. One day, in particular, an inoffensive, simple-minded pauper, whom with others I had often seen used as fencing stuff, standing or sitting on a bushel in the fields to keep cattle and himself from straying, visited me, and expressed a wish to live as I did. He told me, with the utmost simplicity and truth, quite superior, or rather inferior, to any thing that is called humility, that he was “deficient in intellect.” These were his words. The Lord had made him so, yet he supposed the Lord cared as much for him as for another. “I have always been so,” said he, “from my childhood; I never had much mind; I was not like other children; I am weak in the head. It was the Lord’s will, I suppose.” And there he was to prove the truth of his words. He was a metaphysical puzzle to me. I have rarely met a fellow-man on such promising ground,—it was so simple and sincere and so true all that he said. And, true enough, in proportion as he appeared to humble himself was he exalted. I did not know at first but it was the result of a wise policy. It seemed that from such a basis of truth and frankness as the poor weak-headed pauper had laid, our intercourse might go forward to something better than the intercourse of sages.

Many travelers went out of their way to visit me and see the inside of my house, and as an excuse for stopping by, they would ask for a glass of water. I told them I drank from the pond and pointed it out, offering to lend them a dipper. Even though I lived far away, I wasn't free from the yearly influx that happens around the first of April when everyone is traveling; I had my share of good fortune, though some of my visitors were quite unusual. People with limited minds from the almshouse and other places came to see me, but I tried to make them use whatever wit they had and share their thoughts with me, focusing our conversations on wit, and I felt rewarded for it. In fact, I found some of them to be wiser than the so-called overseers of the poor and town officials, and I thought it was time for a shift in perspective. When it comes to wit, I learned there wasn’t much difference between those with limited intellect and those considered whole. One day, a harmless, simple-minded pauper, who I had often seen used as support—standing or sitting on a bushel in the fields to keep cattle and himself from wandering—came to visit me and expressed a desire to live like I did. He told me, in the simplest and most honest way, quite beyond what people might call humility, that he was “deficient in intellect.” Those were his exact words. God had made him that way, yet he believed God cared as much for him as for anyone else. “I have always been like this,” he said, “since I was a child; I never had much of a mind; I wasn’t like other kids; I am weak in the head. I suppose it was God’s will.” And there he was to prove the truth of his statement. He was a real puzzle to me. I have rarely met anyone on such honest terms—it was all so simple and sincere and true what he said. And indeed, as he seemed to humble himself, he was elevated in a way. At first, I didn’t know if this was a result of a clever strategy. It appeared that from such a basis of truth and honesty laid down by the poor, weak-minded pauper, our exchange could lead to something deeper than the conversations of wise men.

I had some guests from those not reckoned commonly among the town’s poor, but who should be; who are among the world’s poor, at any rate; guests who appeal, not to your hospitality, but to your hospitalality; who earnestly wish to be helped, and preface their appeal with the information that they are resolved, for one thing, never to help themselves. I require of a visitor that he be not actually starving, though he may have the very best appetite in the world, however he got it. Objects of charity are not guests. Men who did not know when their visit had terminated, though I went about my business again, answering them from greater and greater remoteness. Men of almost every degree of wit called on me in the migrating season. Some who had more wits than they knew what to do with; runaway slaves with plantation manners, who listened from time to time, like the fox in the fable, as if they heard the hounds a-baying on their track, and looked at me beseechingly, as much as to say,—

I had some visitors who weren’t usually thought of as the town's poor, but they really should be; they’re definitely among the world's poor. They don’t just want your hospitality; they genuinely want your help. They even start their request by letting you know they’ve made up their minds never to help themselves. I expect a visitor to not be literally starving, even if they have an enormous appetite, no matter how they got it. People who rely on charity aren’t really guests. There were men who didn’t realize when their visit had ended, even as I went back to my work, only answering them from farther away. During migration season, I had calls from men of all sorts of wit. Some had more smarts than they knew what to do with; others were runaway slaves with plantation habits, listening every now and then, like the fox in the fable, as if they heard the hounds chasing after them, and looked at me pleadingly, almost as if to say,—

“O Christian, will you send me back?”

“O Christian, will you send me back?”

One real runaway slave, among the rest, whom I helped to forward toward the northstar. Men of one idea, like a hen with one chicken, and that a duckling; men of a thousand ideas, and unkempt heads, like those hens which are made to take charge of a hundred chickens, all in pursuit of one bug, a score of them lost in every morning’s dew,—and become frizzled and mangy in consequence; men of ideas instead of legs, a sort of intellectual centipede that made you crawl all over. One man proposed a book in which visitors should write their names, as at the White Mountains; but, alas! I have too good a memory to make that necessary.

One real runaway slave, among others, whom I helped toward the north star. Men with one single idea, like a hen with just one chick, and that chick being a duckling; men filled with a thousand ideas and messy hair, like those hens that have to look after a hundred chicks, all chasing after one bug, losing a bunch of them in the morning dew—and getting frizzy and scruffy because of it; men of ideas instead of action, a kind of intellectual centipede that made you feel like you were crawling all over them. One man suggested a book where visitors could write their names, like at the White Mountains; but, unfortunately, I have too sharp a memory to make that necessary.

I could not but notice some of the peculiarities of my visitors. Girls and boys and young women generally seemed glad to be in the woods. They looked in the pond and at the flowers, and improved their time. Men of business, even farmers, thought only of solitude and employment, and of the great distance at which I dwelt from something or other; and though they said that they loved a ramble in the woods occasionally, it was obvious that they did not. Restless committed men, whose time was all taken up in getting a living or keeping it; ministers who spoke of God as if they enjoyed a monopoly of the subject, who could not bear all kinds of opinions; doctors, lawyers, uneasy housekeepers who pried into my cupboard and bed when I was out,—how came Mrs. —— to know that my sheets were not as clean as hers?—young men who had ceased to be young, and had concluded that it was safest to follow the beaten track of the professions,—all these generally said that it was not possible to do so much good in my position. Ay! there was the rub. The old and infirm and the timid, of whatever age or sex, thought most of sickness, and sudden accident and death; to them life seemed full of danger,—what danger is there if you don’t think of any?—and they thought that a prudent man would carefully select the safest position, where Dr. B. might be on hand at a moment’s warning. To them the village was literally a com-munity, a league for mutual defence, and you would suppose that they would not go a-huckleberrying without a medicine chest. The amount of it is, if a man is alive, there is always danger that he may die, though the danger must be allowed to be less in proportion as he is dead-and-alive to begin with. A man sits as many risks as he runs. Finally, there were the self-styled reformers, the greatest bores of all, who thought that I was forever singing,—

I couldn't help but notice some of the odd behaviors of my visitors. Girls, boys, and young women generally seemed happy to be in the woods. They looked at the pond and the flowers, making the most of their time. Businessmen, including farmers, only thought about solitude and work, and how far away I lived from something or other; even though they claimed to love a stroll in the woods now and then, it was clear they didn’t. Restless, committed men, whose time was consumed by making a living or holding onto it; ministers who talked about God as if they had exclusive rights to the topic, who couldn’t handle differing opinions; doctors, lawyers, nosy housekeepers who snooped through my cupboards and bed when I was out—how did Mrs. —— know that my sheets weren’t as clean as hers?—young men who had stopped being young and decided it was safest to stick to traditional career paths—all of these usually said it wasn’t possible to do much good in my position. Ah! There was the issue. The old, infirm, and timid, regardless of age or gender, mostly thought about illness, sudden accidents, and death; to them, life felt full of danger—what danger is there if you don’t think about any?—and they believed a sensible person would carefully choose the safest spot, where Dr. B. could be on call at a moment’s notice. To them, the village was literally a community, a group for mutual protection, and you would think they wouldn’t go berry-picking without a first aid kit. The bottom line is, if a person is alive, there is always danger that he might die, although the risk must be considered smaller the more he is already "dead and alive" to start with. A person faces as many risks as he takes. Finally, there were the so-called reformers, the most annoying of all, who thought I was always singing,—

This is the house that I built;
This is the man that lives in the house that I built;

This is the house I built;
This is the man who lives in the house I built;

but they did not know that the third line was,—

but they didn’t realize that the third line was,—

These are the folks that worry the man
That lives in the house that I built.

These are the people who concern the guy
Who lives in the house that I built.

I did not fear the hen-harriers, for I kept no chickens; but I feared the men-harriers rather.

I wasn't afraid of the hen-harriers since I had no chickens; but I was more afraid of the men-harriers.

I had more cheering visitors than the last. Children come a-berrying, railroad men taking a Sunday morning walk in clean shirts, fishermen and hunters, poets and philosophers; in short, all honest pilgrims, who came out to the woods for freedom’s sake, and really left the village behind, I was ready to greet with,—“Welcome, Englishmen! welcome, Englishmen!” for I had had communication with that race.

I had more cheerful visitors than before. Kids came to pick berries, railroad workers were out for a Sunday morning stroll in clean shirts, and there were fishermen and hunters, poets and philosophers; in short, all the honest travelers who ventured into the woods for the sake of freedom, really leaving the village behind. I was ready to greet them with, “Welcome, Englishmen! welcome, Englishmen!” because I had connected with that group.

The Bean-Field

Meanwhile my beans, the length of whose rows, added together, was seven miles already planted, were impatient to be hoed, for the earliest had grown considerably before the latest were in the ground; indeed they were not easily to be put off. What was the meaning of this so steady and self-respecting, this small Herculean labor, I knew not. I came to love my rows, my beans, though so many more than I wanted. They attached me to the earth, and so I got strength like Antæus. But why should I raise them? Only Heaven knows. This was my curious labor all summer,—to make this portion of the earth’s surface, which had yielded only cinquefoil, blackberries, johnswort, and the like, before, sweet wild fruits and pleasant flowers, produce instead this pulse. What shall I learn of beans or beans of me? I cherish them, I hoe them, early and late I have an eye to them; and this is my day’s work. It is a fine broad leaf to look on. My auxiliaries are the dews and rains which water this dry soil, and what fertility is in the soil itself, which for the most part is lean and effete. My enemies are worms, cool days, and most of all woodchucks. The last have nibbled for me a quarter of an acre clean. But what right had I to oust johnswort and the rest, and break up their ancient herb garden? Soon, however, the remaining beans will be too tough for them, and go forward to meet new foes.

Meanwhile, my beans, whose rows added up to seven miles, were eager to be hoed, since the earliest ones had grown quite a bit before the last ones were even planted; they really didn’t want to be ignored. I wasn’t sure why this steady and self-reliant, small but Herculean effort mattered to me. I grew to love my rows and my beans, even though I had more than I needed. They connected me to the earth, giving me strength like Antaeus. But why was I raising them? Only Heaven knows. This was my unusual summer work—transforming this part of the earth, which had previously produced only cinquefoil, blackberries, johnswort, and similar plants, into a place for this pulse. What will I learn from beans or they from me? I care for them, hoe them, and keep an eye on them from early morning to late evening; this is my daily task. It’s nice to look at those broad leaves. My helpers are the dews and rains that moisten this dry soil, along with whatever fertility exists in the soil itself, which is mostly poor and depleted. My enemies are worms, chilly days, and especially woodchucks. Those woodchucks have already devoured a quarter of an acre for me. But what right did I have to push out johnswort and the others, disrupting their long-standing herb garden? Soon, though, the remaining beans will be too tough for them, and I’ll have to face new challenges.

When I was four years old, as I well remember, I was brought from Boston to this my native town, through these very woods and this field, to the pond. It is one of the oldest scenes stamped on my memory. And now to-night my flute has waked the echoes over that very water. The pines still stand here older than I; or, if some have fallen, I have cooked my supper with their stumps, and a new growth is rising all around, preparing another aspect for new infant eyes. Almost the same johnswort springs from the same perennial root in this pasture, and even I have at length helped to clothe that fabulous landscape of my infant dreams, and one of the results of my presence and influence is seen in these bean leaves, corn blades, and potato vines.

When I was four years old, I clearly remember being brought from Boston to this hometown of mine, through these same woods and this field, to the pond. It's one of the oldest scenes etched in my memory. And now tonight, my flute has awakened the echoes over that very water. The pines still stand here, older than me; or, if some have fallen, I've cooked my dinner using their stumps, and a new growth is rising all around, creating a new look for fresh young eyes. Almost the same johnswort springs from the same perennial root in this pasture, and even I have finally contributed to dressing that incredible landscape of my childhood dreams, and one of the outcomes of my presence and influence is seen in these bean leaves, corn blades, and potato vines.

I planted about two acres and a half of upland; and as it was only about fifteen years since the land was cleared, and I myself had got out two or three cords of stumps, I did not give it any manure; but in the course of the summer it appeared by the arrowheads which I turned up in hoeing, that an extinct nation had anciently dwelt here and planted corn and beans ere white men came to clear the land, and so, to some extent, had exhausted the soil for this very crop.

I planted around two and a half acres of dry land; and since it had only been about fifteen years since the land was cleared, and I had removed a couple of cords of stumps myself, I didn't add any fertilizer. However, during the summer, I discovered arrowheads while hoeing, indicating that an ancient civilization had lived here and grown corn and beans long before white settlers came to clear the area, which had somewhat depleted the soil for this specific crop.

Before yet any woodchuck or squirrel had run across the road, or the sun had got above the shrub oaks, while all the dew was on, though the farmers warned me against it,—I would advise you to do all your work if possible while the dew is on,—I began to level the ranks of haughty weeds in my bean-field and throw dust upon their heads. Early in the morning I worked barefooted, dabbling like a plastic artist in the dewy and crumbling sand, but later in the day the sun blistered my feet. There the sun lighted me to hoe beans, pacing slowly backward and forward over that yellow gravelly upland, between the long green rows, fifteen rods, the one end terminating in a shrub oak copse where I could rest in the shade, the other in a blackberry field where the green berries deepened their tints by the time I had made another bout. Removing the weeds, putting fresh soil about the bean stems, and encouraging this weed which I had sown, making the yellow soil express its summer thought in bean leaves and blossoms rather than in wormwood and piper and millet grass, making the earth say beans instead of grass,—this was my daily work. As I had little aid from horses or cattle, or hired men or boys, or improved implements of husbandry, I was much slower, and became much more intimate with my beans than usual. But labor of the hands, even when pursued to the verge of drudgery, is perhaps never the worst form of idleness. It has a constant and imperishable moral, and to the scholar it yields a classic result. A very agricola laboriosus was I to travellers bound westward through Lincoln and Wayland to nobody knows where; they sitting at their ease in gigs, with elbows on knees, and reins loosely hanging in festoons; I the home-staying, laborious native of the soil. But soon my homestead was out of their sight and thought. It was the only open and cultivated field for a great distance on either side of the road; so they made the most of it; and sometimes the man in the field heard more of travellers’ gossip and comment than was meant for his ear: “Beans so late! peas so late!”—for I continued to plant when others had begun to hoe,—the ministerial husbandman had not suspected it. “Corn, my boy, for fodder; corn for fodder.” “Does he live there?” asks the black bonnet of the gray coat; and the hard-featured farmer reins up his grateful dobbin to inquire what you are doing where he sees no manure in the furrow, and recommends a little chip dirt, or any little waste stuff, or it may be ashes or plaster. But here were two acres and a half of furrows, and only a hoe for cart and two hands to draw it,—there being an aversion to other carts and horses,—and chip dirt far away. Fellow-travellers as they rattled by compared it aloud with the fields which they had passed, so that I came to know how I stood in the agricultural world. This was one field not in Mr. Coleman’s report. And, by the way, who estimates the value of the crop which nature yields in the still wilder fields unimproved by man? The crop of English hay is carefully weighed, the moisture calculated, the silicates and the potash; but in all dells and pond holes in the woods and pastures and swamps grows a rich and various crop only unreaped by man. Mine was, as it were, the connecting link between wild and cultivated fields; as some states are civilized, and others half-civilized, and others savage or barbarous, so my field was, though not in a bad sense, a half-cultivated field. They were beans cheerfully returning to their wild and primitive state that I cultivated, and my hoe played the Ranz des Vaches for them.

Before any woodchuck or squirrel had crossed the road, or the sun had risen above the shrub oaks, while the dew was still on the ground—though the farmers advised me against it, saying I should do all my work while the dew was present—I started to clear away the proud weeds in my bean field and tossed dirt onto them. Early in the morning, I worked barefoot, playing in the dewy, crumbling sand like an artist, but as the day wore on, the sun burned my feet. The sunlight guided me as I hoed beans, pacing back and forth over that yellow, gravelly upland between the long green rows, fifteen rods long, one end ending in a copse of shrub oaks where I could rest in the shade, and the other leading to a blackberry field where the green berries grew darker as I took another turn. My daily tasks included removing the weeds, freshening the soil around the bean plants, and nurturing the crop I had sown, encouraging the yellow soil to produce bean leaves and blossoms rather than wormwood and millet grass, making the earth say "beans" instead of "grass." This was my routine. Since I had little help from horses, cattle, hired men, boys, or advanced farming tools, I worked slower and became much more familiar with my beans than usual. However, labor, even when it approaches drudgery, is rarely the worst form of idleness. It carries a constant and lasting lesson, and for the scholar, it offers a classic outcome. I was quite the hardworking farmer to travelers heading west through Lincoln and Wayland to who knows where; they relaxed in their carriages, elbows on knees, reins loosely hanging; I was the devoted, hardworking local. But soon my home faded from their sight and thoughts. It was the only open and cultivated field for a long stretch on either side of the road, so they took full advantage of it. Sometimes, the man in the field overheard more traveler gossip and comments than intended for him: “Beans so late! Peas so late!”—since I continued to plant as others began to hoe—the dutiful farmer hadn’t caught on. “Corn, my boy, for fodder; corn for fodder.” “Does he live there?” asked the woman in the black bonnet of the man in the gray coat, while the rugged farmer stopped his grateful horse to ask what I was doing where he saw no manure in the furrow, suggesting a bit of chip dirt, or another little waste material, or perhaps ashes or plaster. But I had two and a half acres of furrows, just a hoe for a cart and two hands to pull it—there being a reluctance for other carts and horses—and chip dirt far away. Fellow travelers, as they rattled by, compared my field aloud to the fields they had passed, allowing me to see how I measured up in the agricultural landscape. This was one field not included in Mr. Coleman’s report. And by the way, who assesses the worth of the crop that nature produces in the wild fields untouched by humans? The crop of English hay is carefully weighed, with calculations for moisture, silicates, and potash; yet in all the dells and ponds in the woods, pastures, and swamps grows a rich and diverse crop, unharvested by mankind. Mine was, in a way, the bridge between wild and cultivated fields; just as some states are civilized, others half-civilized, and others savage or barbarous, my field was, not in a bad sense, a half-cultivated space. The beans I nurtured cheerfully returned to their wild, primitive state, and my hoe played the Ranz des Vaches for them.

Near at hand, upon the topmost spray of a birch, sings the brown-thrasher—or red mavis, as some love to call him—all the morning, glad of your society, that would find out another farmer’s field if yours were not here. While you are planting the seed, he cries,—“Drop it, drop it,—cover it up, cover it up,—pull it up, pull it up, pull it up.” But this was not corn, and so it was safe from such enemies as he. You may wonder what his rigmarole, his amateur Paganini performances on one string or on twenty, have to do with your planting, and yet prefer it to leached ashes or plaster. It was a cheap sort of top dressing in which I had entire faith.

Nearby, perched on the highest branch of a birch tree, sings the brown-thrasher—or red mavis, as some like to call him—all morning, happy to have your company, ready to find another farmer’s field if yours wasn’t here. While you’re planting the seed, he shouts, “Drop it, drop it—cover it up, cover it up—pull it up, pull it up, pull it up.” But this wasn’t corn, so it was safe from such enemies as him. You might wonder what his chatter, his amateur violin performances on one string or twenty, have to do with your planting, and yet you might prefer it to leached ashes or plaster. It was a simple kind of top dressing in which I had complete faith.

As I drew a still fresher soil about the rows with my hoe, I disturbed the ashes of unchronicled nations who in primeval years lived under these heavens, and their small implements of war and hunting were brought to the light of this modern day. They lay mingled with other natural stones, some of which bore the marks of having been burned by Indian fires, and some by the sun, and also bits of pottery and glass brought hither by the recent cultivators of the soil. When my hoe tinkled against the stones, that music echoed to the woods and the sky, and was an accompaniment to my labor which yielded an instant and immeasurable crop. It was no longer beans that I hoed, nor I that hoed beans; and I remembered with as much pity as pride, if I remembered at all, my acquaintances who had gone to the city to attend the oratorios. The night-hawk circled overhead in the sunny afternoons—for I sometimes made a day of it—like a mote in the eye, or in heaven’s eye, falling from time to time with a swoop and a sound as if the heavens were rent, torn at last to very rags and tatters, and yet a seamless cope remained; small imps that fill the air and lay their eggs on the ground on bare sand or rocks on the tops of hills, where few have found them; graceful and slender like ripples caught up from the pond, as leaves are raised by the wind to float in the heavens; such kindredship is in Nature. The hawk is aerial brother of the wave which he sails over and surveys, those his perfect air-inflated wings answering to the elemental unfledged pinions of the sea. Or sometimes I watched a pair of hen-hawks circling high in the sky, alternately soaring and descending, approaching, and leaving one another, as if they were the embodiment of my own thoughts. Or I was attracted by the passage of wild pigeons from this wood to that, with a slight quivering winnowing sound and carrier haste; or from under a rotten stump my hoe turned up a sluggish portentous and outlandish spotted salamander, a trace of Egypt and the Nile, yet our contemporary. When I paused to lean on my hoe, these sounds and sights I heard and saw anywhere in the row, a part of the inexhaustible entertainment which the country offers.

As I scraped fresh soil around the rows with my hoe, I disturbed the remains of forgotten nations who lived under these skies in ancient times, and their small tools of war and hunting surfaced in this modern day. They lay mixed with other natural stones, some of which showed signs of having been scorched by Indian fires, and others by the sun, along with bits of pottery and glass left behind by the recent farmers. When my hoe clinked against the stones, that sound echoed through the woods and the sky, creating a soundtrack to my work that produced an immediate and abundant harvest. It was no longer just beans I was hoeing, nor was I merely hoeing beans; and with as much sadness as pride, if I remembered at all, I thought of my friends who had gone to the city to attend concerts. The night-hawk circled overhead in the sunny afternoons—sometimes I spent the whole day out—like a speck in the eye, or in the sky, occasionally diving down with a sound that felt like the heavens were tearing, eventually becoming tattered, yet a seamless cloak remained; small creatures filled the air, laying their eggs on bare sand or rocks atop the hills where few have found them; they were graceful and slender like ripples lifted from the pond, just as leaves are blown by the wind to drift through the sky; such connection exists in Nature. The hawk is an aerial sibling of the waves beneath it, gliding over and surveying them, with its perfect, air-filled wings responding to the unformed flaps of the sea. Or sometimes I watched a pair of hen-hawks circle high in the sky, alternately soaring and descending, coming close and then drifting apart, as if they represented my own thoughts. I was also drawn to the movement of wild pigeons flying from one wood to another, making a soft fluttering sound and hurrying along; or my hoe would uncover a strange, sluggish spotted salamander beneath a decaying stump, a relic of Egypt and the Nile, yet still a part of our present. When I took a moment to lean on my hoe, I could see and hear these sights and sounds anywhere in the row, part of the endless enjoyment that the countryside provides.

On gala days the town fires its great guns, which echo like popguns to these woods, and some waifs of martial music occasionally penetrate thus far. To me, away there in my bean-field at the other end of the town, the big guns sounded as if a puffball had burst; and when there was a military turnout of which I was ignorant, I have sometimes had a vague sense all the day of some sort of itching and disease in the horizon, as if some eruption would break out there soon, either scarlatina or canker-rash, until at length some more favorable puff of wind, making haste over the fields and up the Wayland road, brought me information of the “trainers.” It seemed by the distant hum as if somebody’s bees had swarmed, and that the neighbors, according to Virgil’s advice, by a faint tintinnabulum upon the most sonorous of their domestic utensils, were endeavoring to call them down into the hive again. And when the sound died quite away, and the hum had ceased, and the most favorable breezes told no tale, I knew that they had got the last drone of them all safely into the Middlesex hive, and that now their minds were bent on the honey with which it was smeared.

On celebration days, the town fires its big cannons, which echo like toy guns through these woods, and a few bits of military music sometimes reach this far. To me, out there in my bean field at the other end of town, the loud cannons sounded like a puffball bursting; and when there was a military parade that I didn’t know about, I sometimes felt a vague sense of something weird and unsettling on the horizon, as if some sort of outbreak was about to happen, like scarlet fever or canker rash, until a more favorable gust of wind rushed over the fields and up Wayland road to tell me about the "trainers." The distant buzzing felt like someone’s bees had swarmed, and the neighbors, following Virgil's advice, were faintly tinkling their most resonant kitchenware, trying to lure them back into the hive. And when the sound completely faded away, and the buzzing stopped, and the gentle breezes revealed no more news, I knew they had managed to get the last drone into the Middlesex hive, and now they were focused on the honey smeared inside.

I felt proud to know that the liberties of Massachusetts and of our fatherland were in such safe keeping; and as I turned to my hoeing again I was filled with an inexpressible confidence, and pursued my labor cheerfully with a calm trust in the future.

I felt proud to know that the freedoms of Massachusetts and our homeland were in such good hands; and as I returned to my hoeing, I was filled with a deep sense of confidence, and worked happily with a calm trust in what was to come.

When there were several bands of musicians, it sounded as if all the village was a vast bellows, and all the buildings expanded and collapsed alternately with a din. But sometimes it was a really noble and inspiring strain that reached these woods, and the trumpet that sings of fame, and I felt as if I could spit a Mexican with a good relish,—for why should we always stand for trifles?—and looked round for a woodchuck or a skunk to exercise my chivalry upon. These martial strains seemed as far away as Palestine, and reminded me of a march of crusaders in the horizon, with a slight tantivy and tremulous motion of the elm-tree tops which overhang the village. This was one of the great days; though the sky had from my clearing only the same everlastingly great look that it wears daily, and I saw no difference in it.

When there were multiple bands of musicians, it felt like the whole village was a huge bellows, with the buildings rising and falling in sync with the noise. But sometimes, a truly noble and inspiring tune would reach these woods, and the trumpet that heralds glory made me feel like I could take on anything—why should we always settle for the little things?—and I started looking for a woodchuck or a skunk to prove my bravery on. These martial tunes seemed as distant as Palestine, reminding me of a march of crusaders on the horizon, accompanied by a slight rustling and tremulous motion of the elm tree tops that shaded the village. This was one of the great days; even though from my clearing, the sky looked the same as it always does, with no noticeable difference.

It was a singular experience that long acquaintance which I cultivated with beans, what with planting, and hoeing, and harvesting, and threshing, and picking over and selling them,—the last was the hardest of all,—I might add eating, for I did taste. I was determined to know beans. When they were growing, I used to hoe from five o’clock in the morning till noon, and commonly spent the rest of the day about other affairs. Consider the intimate and curious acquaintance one makes with various kinds of weeds,—it will bear some iteration in the account, for there was no little iteration in the labor,—disturbing their delicate organizations so ruthlessly, and making such invidious distinctions with his hoe, levelling whole ranks of one species, and sedulously cultivating another. That’s Roman wormwood,—that’s pigweed,—that’s sorrel,—that’s piper-grass,—have at him, chop him up, turn his roots upward to the sun, don’t let him have a fibre in the shade, if you do he’ll turn himself t’other side up and be as green as a leek in two days. A long war, not with cranes, but with weeds, those Trojans who had sun and rain and dews on their side. Daily the beans saw me come to their rescue armed with a hoe, and thin the ranks of their enemies, filling up the trenches with weedy dead. Many a lusty crest-waving Hector, that towered a whole foot above his crowding comrades, fell before my weapon and rolled in the dust.

I had a unique experience growing close to beans through planting, hoeing, harvesting, threshing, picking, and selling them—the selling was the hardest part. I should also mention eating them since I did give them a try. I was determined to really understand beans. While they were growing, I would hoe from five in the morning until noon and usually spent the rest of the day on other tasks. Think about the close and intriguing relationship you develop with different types of weeds — it deserves some repetition in the story, because the labor involved was quite repetitive — as I disturb their delicate structures without mercy and make such unfair distinctions with my hoe, leveling whole groups of one type while carefully cultivating another. That’s Roman wormwood—there’s pigweed—there’s sorrel—there's piper-grass—let’s get rid of it, chop it up, turn its roots to the sun, don’t let it get any shade; otherwise, it’ll flip itself over and be as green as a leek in two days. It was a long battle, not with cranes but with weeds, those Trojans who had sun, rain, and dew on their side. Every day the beans saw me come to their aid armed with a hoe, thinning out their enemies and filling the trenches with weedy remains. Many a strong Hector, towering a whole foot above his fellow comrades, fell before my weapon and rolled in the dust.

Those summer days which some of my contemporaries devoted to the fine arts in Boston or Rome, and others to contemplation in India, and others to trade in London or New York, I thus, with the other farmers of New England, devoted to husbandry. Not that I wanted beans to eat, for I am by nature a Pythagorean, so far as beans are concerned, whether they mean porridge or voting, and exchanged them for rice; but, perchance, as some must work in fields if only for the sake of tropes and expression, to serve a parable-maker one day. It was on the whole a rare amusement, which, continued too long, might have become a dissipation. Though I gave them no manure, and did not hoe them all once, I hoed them unusually well as far as I went, and was paid for it in the end, “there being in truth,” as Evelyn says, “no compost or lætation whatsoever comparable to this continual motion, repastination, and turning of the mould with the spade.” “The earth,” he adds elsewhere, “especially if fresh, has a certain magnetism in it, by which it attracts the salt, power, or virtue (call it either) which gives it life, and is the logic of all the labor and stir we keep about it, to sustain us; all dungings and other sordid temperings being but the vicars succedaneous to this improvement.” Moreover, this being one of those “worn-out and exhausted lay fields which enjoy their sabbath,” had perchance, as Sir Kenelm Digby thinks likely, attracted “vital spirits” from the air. I harvested twelve bushels of beans.

Those summer days that some of my peers spent on the fine arts in Boston or Rome, others in contemplation in India, and still others in business in London or New York, I spent, along with other farmers in New England, on farming. It’s not that I needed beans to eat, since I'm naturally inclined towards vegetarianism when it comes to beans, whether they refer to porridge or voting, and I traded them for rice; but perhaps, like some who must work in fields just for the sake of metaphors and expression, to serve a story-teller one day. Overall, it was quite an enjoyable pastime, which, if prolonged, could have turned into a distraction. Although I didn't use any fertilizer and didn’t tend to all of them even once, I cultivated them surprisingly well considering how much I did, and I was rewarded in the end, “there being in truth,” as Evelyn says, “no compost or nourishment whatsoever comparable to this constant motion, working the soil, and turning it over with the spade.” “The earth,” he adds elsewhere, “especially if fresh, has a certain magnetism that attracts the salt, power, or virtue (call it what you will) that gives it life, and is the reasoning behind all the work and effort we put into it to sustain us; all fertilizing and other messy treatments are merely substitutes for this enhancement.” Moreover, this being one of those “worn-out and exhausted fields that take a break,” may have, as Sir Kenelm Digby likely thought, attracted “vital spirits” from the air. I harvested twelve bushels of beans.

But to be more particular, for it is complained that Mr. Coleman has reported chiefly the expensive experiments of gentlemen farmers, my outgoes were,—

But to be more specific, it’s been said that Mr. Coleman mostly reported the costly experiments of wealthy farmers; my expenses were,—

    For a hoe,.................................. $ 0.54
    Ploughing, harrowing, and furrowing,.........  7.50  Too much.
    Beans for seed,..............................  3.12½
    Potatoes for seed,...........................  1.33
    Peas for seed,...............................  0.40
    Turnip seed,.................................  0.06
    White line for crow fence,...................  0.02
    Horse cultivator and boy three hours,........  1.00
    Horse and cart to get crop,..................  0.75
                                                   ————
        In all,................................. $14.72½
    For a hoe,.................................. $0.54  
    Plowing, harrowing, and furrowing,......... $7.50 Too much.  
    Beans for seed,.............................. $3.12½  
    Potatoes for seed,........................... $1.33  
    Peas for seed,............................... $0.40  
    Turnip seed,................................. $0.06  
    White line for crow fence,................... $0.02  
    Horse cultivator and boy for three hours,.... $1.00  
    Horse and cart to get the crop,............. $0.75  
                                                   ————  
        Total,................................. $14.72½  

My income was (patrem familias vendacem, non emacem esse oportet), from

My income was (the head of the family should be a seller, not a buyer), from

    Nine bushels and twelve quarts of beans sold,. $16.94
    Five    "    large potatoes,.................... 2.50
    Nine    "    small,............................. 2.25
    Grass,.......................................... 1.00
    Stalks,......................................... 0.75
                                                     ————
        In all,................................... $23.44
    Leaving a pecuniary profit,
        as I have elsewhere said, of..............  $8.71½.
    Nine bushels and twelve quarts of beans sold, $16.94  
    Five large potatoes,............................. 2.50  
    Nine small,................................... 2.25  
    Grass,......................................... 1.00  
    Stalks,........................................ 0.75  
                                                     ————  
        Total,................................... $23.44  
    Leaving a profit,  
        as I have mentioned before, of............. $8.71½.  

This is the result of my experience in raising beans. Plant the common small white bush bean about the first of June, in rows three feet by eighteen inches apart, being careful to select fresh round and unmixed seed. First look out for worms, and supply vacancies by planting anew. Then look out for woodchucks, if it is an exposed place, for they will nibble off the earliest tender leaves almost clean as they go; and again, when the young tendrils make their appearance, they have notice of it, and will shear them off with both buds and young pods, sitting erect like a squirrel. But above all harvest as early as possible, if you would escape frosts and have a fair and salable crop; you may save much loss by this means.

This is what I've learned from growing beans. Plant the common small white bush bean around the beginning of June, in rows three feet apart and eighteen inches between each row, making sure to choose fresh, round, and pure seeds. First, watch out for worms and fill any gaps by replanting. Then keep an eye out for woodchucks if your garden is in an open area, because they will munch on the earliest tender leaves almost completely; and again, when the young tendrils start to appear, they'll notice and will snip them off along with both the buds and young pods, sitting up like a squirrel. But most importantly, harvest as early as you can if you want to avoid frost and ensure a good, marketable crop; this will help prevent a lot of losses.

This further experience also I gained. I said to myself, I will not plant beans and corn with so much industry another summer, but such seeds, if the seed is not lost, as sincerity, truth, simplicity, faith, innocence, and the like, and see if they will not grow in this soil, even with less toil and manurance, and sustain me, for surely it has not been exhausted for these crops. Alas! I said this to myself; but now another summer is gone, and another, and another, and I am obliged to say to you, Reader, that the seeds which I planted, if indeed they were the seeds of those virtues, were wormeaten or had lost their vitality, and so did not come up. Commonly men will only be brave as their fathers were brave, or timid. This generation is very sure to plant corn and beans each new year precisely as the Indians did centuries ago and taught the first settlers to do, as if there were a fate in it. I saw an old man the other day, to my astonishment, making the holes with a hoe for the seventieth time at least, and not for himself to lie down in! But why should not the New Englander try new adventures, and not lay so much stress on his grain, his potato and grass crop, and his orchards,—raise other crops than these? Why concern ourselves so much about our beans for seed, and not be concerned at all about a new generation of men? We should really be fed and cheered if when we met a man we were sure to see that some of the qualities which I have named, which we all prize more than those other productions, but which are for the most part broadcast and floating in the air, had taken root and grown in him. Here comes such a subtile and ineffable quality, for instance, as truth or justice, though the slightest amount or new variety of it, along the road. Our ambassadors should be instructed to send home such seeds as these, and Congress help to distribute them over all the land. We should never stand upon ceremony with sincerity. We should never cheat and insult and banish one another by our meanness, if there were present the kernel of worth and friendliness. We should not meet thus in haste. Most men I do not meet at all, for they seem not to have time; they are busy about their beans. We would not deal with a man thus plodding ever, leaning on a hoe or a spade as a staff between his work, not as a mushroom, but partially risen out of the earth, something more than erect, like swallows alighted and walking on the ground:—

This is another lesson I learned. I told myself I wouldn’t work so hard planting beans and corn next summer, but instead I would plant seeds like sincerity, truth, simplicity, faith, innocence, and see if they would grow in this soil with less effort and care, and sustain me, since surely this soil hasn't run out of the ability to support those crops. Alas! I thought this to myself; but now another summer has passed, and another, and another, and I must tell you, Reader, that the seeds I planted, if they were indeed the seeds of those virtues, were eaten by worms or had lost their vitality, so they never sprouted. Usually, people are only as courageous as their fathers were, or timid. This generation is very likely to plant corn and beans each year just as the Native Americans did centuries ago and taught the first settlers, as though it’s destined to be that way. The other day, I was amazed to see an old man making holes with a hoe for at least the seventieth time, and not for himself to lie down in! But why shouldn’t New Englanders try new things and not put so much emphasis on their grain, potato, and grass crops, and their orchards—why not grow different crops? Why are we so focused on our seeds for beans but not worried at all about nurturing a new generation of people? We would feel fulfilled and uplifted if, when we met someone, we could see that some of the qualities I’ve mentioned, which we all value more than those other products, had taken root and grown in them. Here comes a subtle and indescribable quality, for instance, such as truth or justice, even the slightest amount or a new kind of it, on our journey. Our representatives should be told to send home these kinds of seeds, and Congress should help distribute them across the country. We shouldn’t let formality get in the way of sincerity. We shouldn’t cheat, insult, or push each other away through our meanness when we could have the core of worth and kindness present. We shouldn’t rush our meetings. I rarely meet most people because they seem to have no time; they’re busy with their beans. We wouldn’t interact with someone who’s always grinding away, leaning on a hoe or spade like it’s a staff for support between tasks, not like a mushroom, but partially risen out of the ground, more than just standing upright, like swallows that land and walk on the ground:—

“And as he spake, his wings would now and then
Spread, as he meant to fly, then close again,”

“And as he spoke, his wings would occasionally
Spread, as if he intended to fly, then close again,”

so that we should suspect that we might be conversing with an angel. Bread may not always nourish us; but it always does us good, it even takes stiffness out of our joints, and makes us supple and buoyant, when we knew not what ailed us, to recognize any generosity in man or Nature, to share any unmixed and heroic joy.

so that we should suspect that we might be talking to an angel. Bread may not always nourish us, but it always does us good; it even eases the stiffness in our joints and makes us flexible and lively when we didn't know what was bothering us, to recognize any kindness in people or Nature, to share any pure and heroic joy.

Ancient poetry and mythology suggest, at least, that husbandry was once a sacred art; but it is pursued with irreverent haste and heedlessness by us, our object being to have large farms and large crops merely. We have no festival, nor procession, nor ceremony, not excepting our Cattle-shows and so called Thanksgivings, by which the farmer expresses a sense of the sacredness of his calling, or is reminded of its sacred origin. It is the premium and the feast which tempt him. He sacrifices not to Ceres and the Terrestrial Jove, but to the infernal Plutus rather. By avarice and selfishness, and a grovelling habit, from which none of us is free, of regarding the soil as property, or the means of acquiring property chiefly, the landscape is deformed, husbandry is degraded with us, and the farmer leads the meanest of lives. He knows Nature but as a robber. Cato says that the profits of agriculture are particularly pious or just, (maximeque pius quæstus), and according to Varro the old Romans “called the same earth Mother and Ceres, and thought that they who cultivated it led a pious and useful life, and that they alone were left of the race of King Saturn.”

Ancient poetry and mythology suggest that farming was once a sacred art. However, we approach it with a lack of respect and urgency, focused only on having large farms and big harvests. We don't celebrate with festivals, parades, or ceremonies—excluding our cattle shows and so-called Thanksgivings—where farmers could show appreciation for the importance of their work or remember its sacred roots. Instead, they are driven by profits and feasting. They make sacrifices not to Ceres or the Earthly Jove, but rather to the greedy Plutus. Due to greed and selfishness, along with a mindset that sees land mainly as property or a means to gain wealth, the landscape is ruined, farming is disrespected, and farmers live the most base lives. They understand Nature only as a thief. Cato mentions that the profits of agriculture are especially virtuous, and Varro notes that the ancient Romans “referred to the earth as Mother and Ceres, believing that those who farmed it led a virtuous and meaningful life, and that they were the last remnants of the race of King Saturn.”

We are wont to forget that the sun looks on our cultivated fields and on the prairies and forests without distinction. They all reflect and absorb his rays alike, and the former make but a small part of the glorious picture which he beholds in his daily course. In his view the earth is all equally cultivated like a garden. Therefore we should receive the benefit of his light and heat with a corresponding trust and magnanimity. What though I value the seed of these beans, and harvest that in the fall of the year? This broad field which I have looked at so long looks not to me as the principal cultivator, but away from me to influences more genial to it, which water and make it green. These beans have results which are not harvested by me. Do they not grow for woodchucks partly? The ear of wheat (in Latin spica, obsoletely speca, from spe, hope) should not be the only hope of the husbandman; its kernel or grain (granum from gerendo, bearing) is not all that it bears. How, then, can our harvest fail? Shall I not rejoice also at the abundance of the weeds whose seeds are the granary of the birds? It matters little comparatively whether the fields fill the farmer’s barns. The true husbandman will cease from anxiety, as the squirrels manifest no concern whether the woods will bear chestnuts this year or not, and finish his labor with every day, relinquishing all claim to the produce of his fields, and sacrificing in his mind not only his first but his last fruits also.

We tend to forget that the sun shines on our cultivated fields, prairies, and forests without making a distinction. They all reflect and absorb its rays equally, and the cultivated fields are just a small part of the beautiful landscape that the sun sees every day. To it, the earth looks like one big garden. Therefore, we should embrace the benefits of its light and warmth with trust and generosity. Even if I value the seeds I plant and harvest in the fall, this vast field I’ve watched for so long doesn’t seem to recognize me as the main grower; it looks instead to greater forces that nourish and green it. These beans also have purposes beyond my own. Don’t they grow partly for the woodchucks? The ear of wheat (in Latin spica, formerly speca, from spe, meaning hope) shouldn’t be the only hope for the farmer; its kernel or grain (granum from gerendo, meaning bearing) isn’t everything it produces. So, how can we expect a bad harvest? Shouldn’t I also celebrate the abundance of weeds whose seeds feed the birds? It matters little whether the fields fill the farmer's barns. A true farmer will stop worrying, just like squirrels don’t fret about whether the woods will have chestnuts this year, and will finish their work each day, letting go of any claim to the fruits of their land and mentally sacrificing not just their first but also their last harvest.

The Village

After hoeing, or perhaps reading and writing, in the forenoon, I usually bathed again in the pond, swimming across one of its coves for a stint, and washed the dust of labor from my person, or smoothed out the last wrinkle which study had made, and for the afternoon was absolutely free. Every day or two I strolled to the village to hear some of the gossip which is incessantly going on there, circulating either from mouth to mouth, or from newspaper to newspaper, and which, taken in homœopathic doses, was really as refreshing in its way as the rustle of leaves and the peeping of frogs. As I walked in the woods to see the birds and squirrels, so I walked in the village to see the men and boys; instead of the wind among the pines I heard the carts rattle. In one direction from my house there was a colony of muskrats in the river meadows; under the grove of elms and buttonwoods in the other horizon was a village of busy men, as curious to me as if they had been prairie dogs, each sitting at the mouth of its burrow, or running over to a neighbor’s to gossip. I went there frequently to observe their habits. The village appeared to me a great news room; and on one side, to support it, as once at Redding & Company’s on State Street, they kept nuts and raisins, or salt and meal and other groceries. Some have such a vast appetite for the former commodity, that is, the news, and such sound digestive organs, that they can sit forever in public avenues without stirring, and let it simmer and whisper through them like the Etesian winds, or as if inhaling ether, it only producing numbness and insensibility to pain,—otherwise it would often be painful to hear,—without affecting the consciousness. I hardly ever failed, when I rambled through the village, to see a row of such worthies, either sitting on a ladder sunning themselves, with their bodies inclined forward and their eyes glancing along the line this way and that, from time to time, with a voluptuous expression, or else leaning against a barn with their hands in their pockets, like caryatides, as if to prop it up. They, being commonly out of doors, heard whatever was in the wind. These are the coarsest mills, in which all gossip is first rudely digested or cracked up before it is emptied into finer and more delicate hoppers within doors. I observed that the vitals of the village were the grocery, the bar-room, the post-office, and the bank; and, as a necessary part of the machinery, they kept a bell, a big gun, and a fire-engine, at convenient places; and the houses were so arranged as to make the most of mankind, in lanes and fronting one another, so that every traveller had to run the gantlet, and every man, woman, and child might get a lick at him. Of course, those who were stationed nearest to the head of the line, where they could most see and be seen, and have the first blow at him, paid the highest prices for their places; and the few straggling inhabitants in the outskirts, where long gaps in the line began to occur, and the traveller could get over walls or turn aside into cow paths, and so escape, paid a very slight ground or window tax. Signs were hung out on all sides to allure him; some to catch him by the appetite, as the tavern and victualling cellar; some by the fancy, as the dry goods store and the jeweller’s; and others by the hair or the feet or the skirts, as the barber, the shoemaker, or the tailor. Besides, there was a still more terrible standing invitation to call at every one of these houses, and company expected about these times. For the most part I escaped wonderfully from these dangers, either by proceeding at once boldly and without deliberation to the goal, as is recommended to those who run the gantlet, or by keeping my thoughts on high things, like Orpheus, who, “loudly singing the praises of the gods to his lyre, drowned the voices of the Sirens, and kept out of danger.” Sometimes I bolted suddenly, and nobody could tell my whereabouts, for I did not stand much about gracefulness, and never hesitated at a gap in a fence. I was even accustomed to make an irruption into some houses, where I was well entertained, and after learning the kernels and very last sieve-ful of news, what had subsided, the prospects of war and peace, and whether the world was likely to hold together much longer, I was let out through the rear avenues, and so escaped to the woods again.

After hoeing, or maybe reading and writing, in the morning, I usually took another dip in the pond, swimming across one of its coves for a bit, washing off the dust of work from my body, or smoothing out the last wrinkle that studying had made, and by the afternoon, I was completely free. Every day or two, I wandered into the village to catch up on the gossip that was always circulating there, passed from person to person or from newspaper to newspaper, which, in small doses, was as refreshing in its way as the rustle of leaves and the croaking of frogs. As I walked in the woods to see the birds and squirrels, I strolled through the village to observe the men and boys; instead of the wind in the pines, I heard the sound of carts clattering. In one direction from my house, there was a colony of muskrats in the river meadows; under the grove of elms and buttonwoods in the other direction was a village full of busy men, as fascinating to me as if they were prairie dogs, each sitting at the entrance of its burrow or running over to a neighbor’s to chat. I often went there to watch their habits. To me, the village felt like a big news room; and on one side, to support it, the way they did at Redding & Company’s on State Street, they had nuts and raisins, or salt and meal and other groceries. Some people had such a huge appetite for news and such strong stomachs that they could sit for hours in public spaces without moving, letting it simmer and whisper through them like the Etesian winds, or as if they were inhaling ether, which left them numb and insensitive to pain—otherwise it would often hurt to listen—without affecting their awareness. I hardly ever failed to see a row of such characters when I wandered through the village, either lounging on a ladder in the sun, their bodies leaning forward and their eyes scanning the scene back and forth with a blissful look, or propped against a barn with their hands in their pockets, like caryatids, as if to support it. They, usually being outdoors, heard everything that was happening. These are the roughest mills, where all gossip is initially coarsely processed before it gets refined in more delicate spots indoors. I noticed that the heart of the village consisted of the grocery, the bar, the post office, and the bank; and, as a necessary part of the setup, they kept a bell, a big cannon, and a fire engine in accessible places; and the houses were arranged to maximize interaction among people, in lanes facing each other, so that every traveler had to run the gauntlet, and every man, woman, and child could take a shot at him. Naturally, those stationed closest to the start of the line, where they could see and be seen the best, and have the first chance to greet him, paid the highest prices for their spots; while the few straggling residents on the outskirts, where long gaps in the line began to appear, and the traveler could climb over walls or wander off into cow paths and escape, paid very little in ground or window tax. Signs were displayed everywhere to entice him; some aimed to catch him through his appetite, like the tavern and food cellar; some appealed to his imagination, like the dry goods store and the jeweler's; and others got him by his hair, feet, or clothing, like the barber, the shoemaker, or the tailor. Additionally, there was a more forceful standing invitation to visit each of these houses, and guests were expected around these times. For the most part, I managed to navigate these dangers quite well, either by boldly and decisively heading straight for my goal, as recommended for those running the gauntlet, or by keeping my thoughts focused on higher things, like Orpheus, who "loudly sang the praises of the gods to his lyre, drowning out the voices of the Sirens and staying out of danger." Sometimes I would dash away suddenly, and no one could figure out where I had gone, as I wasn't much concerned about looking graceful and never hesitated at a gap in a fence. I was even known to burst into some houses where I was well received, and after gathering up the latest news—the current events, the state of war and peace, and whether the world was likely to hold together for much longer—I would be shown out through the back and escape back to the woods.

It was very pleasant, when I stayed late in town, to launch myself into the night, especially if it was dark and tempestuous, and set sail from some bright village parlor or lecture room, with a bag of rye or Indian meal upon my shoulder, for my snug harbor in the woods, having made all tight without and withdrawn under hatches with a merry crew of thoughts, leaving only my outer man at the helm, or even tying up the helm when it was plain sailing. I had many a genial thought by the cabin fire “as I sailed.” I was never cast away nor distressed in any weather, though I encountered some severe storms. It is darker in the woods, even in common nights, than most suppose. I frequently had to look up at the opening between the trees above the path in order to learn my route, and, where there was no cart-path, to feel with my feet the faint track which I had worn, or steer by the known relation of particular trees which I felt with my hands, passing between two pines for instance, not more than eighteen inches apart, in the midst of the woods, invariably, in the darkest night. Sometimes, after coming home thus late in a dark and muggy night, when my feet felt the path which my eyes could not see, dreaming and absent-minded all the way, until I was aroused by having to raise my hand to lift the latch, I have not been able to recall a single step of my walk, and I have thought that perhaps my body would find its way home if its master should forsake it, as the hand finds its way to the mouth without assistance. Several times, when a visitor chanced to stay into evening, and it proved a dark night, I was obliged to conduct him to the cart-path in the rear of the house, and then point out to him the direction he was to pursue, and in keeping which he was to be guided rather by his feet than his eyes. One very dark night I directed thus on their way two young men who had been fishing in the pond. They lived about a mile off through the woods, and were quite used to the route. A day or two after one of them told me that they wandered about the greater part of the night, close by their own premises, and did not get home till toward morning, by which time, as there had been several heavy showers in the mean while, and the leaves were very wet, they were drenched to their skins. I have heard of many going astray even in the village streets, when the darkness was so thick that you could cut it with a knife, as the saying is. Some who live in the outskirts, having come to town a-shopping in their wagons, have been obliged to put up for the night; and gentlemen and ladies making a call have gone half a mile out of their way, feeling the sidewalk only with their feet, and not knowing when they turned. It is a surprising and memorable, as well as valuable experience, to be lost in the woods any time. Often in a snow storm, even by day, one will come out upon a well-known road and yet find it impossible to tell which way leads to the village. Though he knows that he has travelled it a thousand times, he cannot recognize a feature in it, but it is as strange to him as if it were a road in Siberia. By night, of course, the perplexity is infinitely greater. In our most trivial walks, we are constantly, though unconsciously, steering like pilots by certain well-known beacons and headlands, and if we go beyond our usual course we still carry in our minds the bearing of some neighboring cape; and not till we are completely lost, or turned round,—for a man needs only to be turned round once with his eyes shut in this world to be lost,—do we appreciate the vastness and strangeness of Nature. Every man has to learn the points of compass again as often as he awakes, whether from sleep or any abstraction. Not till we are lost, in other words not till we have lost the world, do we begin to find ourselves, and realize where we are and the infinite extent of our relations.

It was really nice when I stayed late in town, to dive into the night, especially when it was dark and stormy, and head out from a cozy village parlor or lecture room, with a bag of rye or cornmeal slung over my shoulder, for my snug spot in the woods. I’d make sure everything was secured outside and settle in with a lively crew of thoughts, leaving only my physical self at the helm, or even tying up the helm when it was smooth sailing. I had many cheerful thoughts by the cabin fire "as I sailed." I was never shipwrecked or troubled by the weather, even though I faced some fierce storms. It’s darker in the woods, even on ordinary nights, than most people realize. I often had to look up at the opening between the trees overhead to figure out my path, and where there was no cart path, I felt with my feet the faint trail I had worn down, or navigated by the familiar positions of certain trees I could touch, like passing between two pines no more than eighteen inches apart, right in the heart of the woods, no matter how dark the night was. Sometimes, after coming home late on a dark, muggy night, when my feet knew the path that my eyes couldn’t see, lost in thought all the way, until I had to lift my hand to open the latch, I couldn’t remember a single step of my walk. I thought maybe my body would make its way home even if my mind wandered, just like a hand finds its way to the mouth without help. A few times, when a visitor stayed late and it turned out to be a dark night, I had to lead them to the cart path behind the house and then point them in the right direction, where they had to navigate more by feel than by sight. One particularly dark night, I helped two young men who had been fishing in the pond. They lived about a mile away through the woods and were pretty familiar with the route. A day or two later, one of them told me that they ended up wandering for most of the night, right near their own home, and didn’t get back until morning. By then, after several heavy showers, the leaves were so wet that they were soaked to the skin. I’ve heard of many getting lost even on the village streets when the darkness was so thick that you could cut it with a knife, as the saying goes. Some who live on the outskirts, after coming into town to shop in their wagons, have had to stay overnight; and gentlemen and ladies visiting have gone half a mile off course, only feeling the sidewalk with their feet and not realizing when they turned. It’s a surprising, memorable, and valuable experience to be lost in the woods at any time. Often, even in a snowstorm during the day, you might end up on a familiar road and yet find it impossible to know which way leads to the village. Although you know you’ve traveled it a thousand times, nothing looks familiar, and it feels as foreign as a road in Siberia. At night, of course, the confusion is even worse. In our simplest walks, we are always, though unconsciously, navigating like pilots by certain well-known landmarks, and if we stray from our usual path, we still hold in our minds the direction of some nearby landmark; and it’s not until we are completely lost, or turned around—for a person only needs to get turned around once with their eyes shut in this world to be lost—that we realize the vastness and strangeness of Nature. Every person has to relearn the points of the compass every time they wake up, whether from sleep or any distraction. Only when we are lost—in other words, only when we’ve lost touch with the world—do we start to find ourselves and understand where we are and the endless extent of our connections.

One afternoon, near the end of the first summer, when I went to the village to get a shoe from the cobbler’s, I was seized and put into jail, because, as I have elsewhere related, I did not pay a tax to, or recognize the authority of, the state which buys and sells men, women, and children, like cattle at the door of its senate-house. I had gone down to the woods for other purposes. But, wherever a man goes, men will pursue and paw him with their dirty institutions, and, if they can, constrain him to belong to their desperate odd-fellow society. It is true, I might have resisted forcibly with more or less effect, might have run “amok” against society; but I preferred that society should run “amok” against me, it being the desperate party. However, I was released the next day, obtained my mended shoe, and returned to the woods in season to get my dinner of huckleberries on Fair-Haven Hill. I was never molested by any person but those who represented the state. I had no lock nor bolt but for the desk which held my papers, not even a nail to put over my latch or windows. I never fastened my door night or day, though I was to be absent several days; not even when the next fall I spent a fortnight in the woods of Maine. And yet my house was more respected than if it had been surrounded by a file of soldiers. The tired rambler could rest and warm himself by my fire, the literary amuse himself with the few books on my table, or the curious, by opening my closet door, see what was left of my dinner, and what prospect I had of a supper. Yet, though many people of every class came this way to the pond, I suffered no serious inconvenience from these sources, and I never missed anything but one small book, a volume of Homer, which perhaps was improperly gilded, and this I trust a soldier of our camp has found by this time. I am convinced, that if all men were to live as simply as I then did, thieving and robbery would be unknown. These take place only in communities where some have got more than is sufficient while others have not enough. The Pope’s Homers would soon get properly distributed.—

One afternoon, near the end of the first summer, when I went to the village to get a shoe from the cobbler, I was arrested and thrown in jail because, as I've mentioned elsewhere, I didn’t pay a tax to, or acknowledge the authority of, the state that buys and sells men, women, and children like cattle at the door of its senate house. I had gone to the woods for other reasons. But, wherever a person goes, others will pursue and bother them with their dirty institutions, and, if they can, force them to join their desperate little club. It’s true that I could have resisted strong enough to have some effect, might have gone “amok” against society; but I preferred for society to go “amok” against me, as they were the desperate ones. However, I was released the next day, got my repaired shoe, and returned to the woods in time for my dinner of huckleberries on Fair-Haven Hill. I was never bothered by anyone except those representing the state. I had no locks or bolts for my desk that held my papers, not even a nail to put over my latch or windows. I never locked my door, day or night, even when I was gone for several days; not even when the following fall I spent two weeks in the woods of Maine. Yet, my house was more respected than if it had been guarded by a line of soldiers. Tired travelers could rest and warm themselves by my fire, literary folks could entertain themselves with the few books on my table, or the curious could open my closet door to see what was left of my dinner and what prospects I had for supper. Still, although many people from all walks of life passed by on their way to the pond, I didn’t face any serious issues from this, and I only missed one small book, a volume of Homer, which maybe was too ornately gilded, and I hope a soldier from our camp has found it by now. I’m convinced that if everyone lived as simply as I did then, stealing and robbery would be unknown. These crimes happen only in communities where some have more than enough while others have too little. The Pope’s Homers would soon get properly divided.

                “Nec bella fuerunt,
Faginus astabat dum scyphus ante dapes.”

                “Nor wars did men molest,
When only beechen bowls were in request.”

“Nor were there any wars,
While only beech wood bowls were desired.”

“You who govern public affairs, what need have you to employ punishments? Love virtue, and the people will be virtuous. The virtues of a superior man are like the wind; the virtues of a common man are like the grass; the grass, when the wind passes over it, bends.”

"You who are in charge of public affairs, why do you need to use punishments? Embrace goodness, and the people will follow suit. The qualities of a great person are like the wind; the qualities of an ordinary person are like grass; the grass bends when the wind blows over it."

The Ponds

Sometimes, having had a surfeit of human society and gossip, and worn out all my village friends, I rambled still farther westward than I habitually dwell, into yet more unfrequented parts of the town, “to fresh woods and pastures new,” or, while the sun was setting, made my supper of huckleberries and blueberries on Fair Haven Hill, and laid up a store for several days. The fruits do not yield their true flavor to the purchaser of them, nor to him who raises them for the market. There is but one way to obtain it, yet few take that way. If you would know the flavor of huckleberries, ask the cow-boy or the partridge. It is a vulgar error to suppose that you have tasted huckleberries who never plucked them. A huckleberry never reaches Boston; they have not been known there since they grew on her three hills. The ambrosial and essential part of the fruit is lost with the bloom which is rubbed off in the market cart, and they become mere provender. As long as Eternal Justice reigns, not one innocent huckleberry can be transported thither from the country’s hills.

Sometimes, after a lot of human interaction and gossip, and feeling worn out from all my village friends, I wandered even further west than I usually go, into the quieter parts of town, “to fresh woods and pastures new,” or, while the sun was setting, I had huckleberries and blueberries for dinner on Fair Haven Hill, and saved some for the next few days. The true flavor of the fruits doesn’t come through to those who buy them or those who grow them for the market. There’s only one way to really taste them, but few take that route. If you want to know what huckleberries taste like, ask a cow-boy or a partridge. It’s a common misconception to think you’ve tasted huckleberries if you’ve never picked them yourself. A huckleberry never makes it to Boston; they haven’t been seen there since they grew on her three hills. The best part of the fruit is lost when it’s handled in the market cart, and they become mere filler. As long as Eternal Justice exists, not a single innocent huckleberry can be transported from the country’s hills to there.

Occasionally, after my hoeing was done for the day, I joined some impatient companion who had been fishing on the pond since morning, as silent and motionless as a duck or a floating leaf, and, after practising various kinds of philosophy, had concluded commonly, by the time I arrived, that he belonged to the ancient sect of Cœnobites. There was one older man, an excellent fisher and skilled in all kinds of woodcraft, who was pleased to look upon my house as a building erected for the convenience of fishermen; and I was equally pleased when he sat in my doorway to arrange his lines. Once in a while we sat together on the pond, he at one end of the boat, and I at the other; but not many words passed between us, for he had grown deaf in his later years, but he occasionally hummed a psalm, which harmonized well enough with my philosophy. Our intercourse was thus altogether one of unbroken harmony, far more pleasing to remember than if it had been carried on by speech. When, as was commonly the case, I had none to commune with, I used to raise the echoes by striking with a paddle on the side of my boat, filling the surrounding woods with circling and dilating sound, stirring them up as the keeper of a menagerie his wild beasts, until I elicited a growl from every wooded vale and hill-side.

Sometimes, after I finished my gardening for the day, I joined a restless friend who had been fishing at the pond since morning, as still and quiet as a duck or a floating leaf. By the time I arrived, he typically concluded, after pondering various thoughts, that he was part of the old Cœnobite community. There was one older man, a great fisherman and knowledgeable about all kinds of woodcraft, who liked to consider my house as a place built for the convenience of fishermen. I was just as happy when he would sit in my doorway to organize his fishing lines. Occasionally, we would sit together on the pond, him at one end of the boat and me at the other; not many words were exchanged between us since he had become deaf in later years, but he sometimes hummed a psalm that fit nicely with my way of thinking. Our interactions were entirely harmonious, much more enjoyable to recall than if we had talked. When, as often happened, I had no one to share thoughts with, I would create echoes by striking the side of my boat with a paddle, filling the surrounding woods with resonating sound, awakening them as a zookeeper does with wild animals, until I stirred a growl from every wooded valley and hillside.

In warm evenings I frequently sat in the boat playing the flute, and saw the perch, which I seemed to have charmed, hovering around me, and the moon travelling over the ribbed bottom, which was strewed with the wrecks of the forest. Formerly I had come to this pond adventurously, from time to time, in dark summer nights, with a companion, and making a fire close to the water’s edge, which we thought attracted the fishes, we caught pouts with a bunch of worms strung on a thread; and when we had done, far in the night, threw the burning brands high into the air like skyrockets, which, coming down into the pond, were quenched with a loud hissing, and we were suddenly groping in total darkness. Through this, whistling a tune, we took our way to the haunts of men again. But now I had made my home by the shore.

On warm evenings, I often sat in the boat playing the flute, watching the perch that I seemed to have enchanted, swimming around me, and the moon gliding over the textured bottom, scattered with remnants of the forest. In the past, I would adventurously visit this pond occasionally on dark summer nights with a friend. We would build a fire near the water's edge, believing it would attract the fish, and caught bullheads with a bunch of worms tied to a thread. When we were done, late at night, we would throw the burning sticks high into the air like fireworks, which would plunge into the pond with a loud hiss, leaving us suddenly blind in complete darkness. While whistling a tune, we would make our way back to civilization. But now, I had settled by the shore.

Sometimes, after staying in a village parlor till the family had all retired, I have returned to the woods, and, partly with a view to the next day’s dinner, spent the hours of midnight fishing from a boat by moonlight, serenaded by owls and foxes, and hearing, from time to time, the creaking note of some unknown bird close at hand. These experiences were very memorable and valuable to me,—anchored in forty feet of water, and twenty or thirty rods from the shore, surrounded sometimes by thousands of small perch and shiners, dimpling the surface with their tails in the moonlight, and communicating by a long flaxen line with mysterious nocturnal fishes which had their dwelling forty feet below, or sometimes dragging sixty feet of line about the pond as I drifted in the gentle night breeze, now and then feeling a slight vibration along it, indicative of some life prowling about its extremity, of dull uncertain blundering purpose there, and slow to make up its mind. At length you slowly raise, pulling hand over hand, some horned pout squeaking and squirming to the upper air. It was very queer, especially in dark nights, when your thoughts had wandered to vast and cosmogonal themes in other spheres, to feel this faint jerk, which came to interrupt your dreams and link you to Nature again. It seemed as if I might next cast my line upward into the air, as well as downward into this element, which was scarcely more dense. Thus I caught two fishes as it were with one hook.

Sometimes, after hanging out in a village living room until the family went to bed, I would head back to the woods. Partly thinking about the next day's dinner, I spent midnight fishing from a boat by the moonlight, serenaded by owls and foxes, and occasionally hearing the creaking sound of some unknown bird nearby. These moments were incredibly memorable and valuable to me—anchored in forty feet of water, twenty or thirty rods from the shore, sometimes surrounded by thousands of small perch and shiners, making ripples on the surface with their tails in the moonlight, communicating through a long flaxen line with mysterious nocturnal fish living forty feet below. Sometimes I dragged sixty feet of line around the pond as I floated in the gentle night breeze, occasionally feeling a slight vibration indicating some life bumping around at the end of it, moving aimlessly and slow to decide. Eventually, I'd slowly pull up, hand over hand, some horned pout squeaking and squirming as it reached the surface. It was really strange, especially on dark nights, when my mind had drifted to vast and cosmic themes in other realms, to feel this faint tug that interrupted my thoughts and reconnected me with Nature. It felt like I could cast my line up into the air as easily as down into the water, which was hardly more dense. So, in a way, I caught two fish with one hook.

The scenery of Walden is on a humble scale, and, though very beautiful, does not approach to grandeur, nor can it much concern one who has not long frequented it or lived by its shore; yet this pond is so remarkable for its depth and purity as to merit a particular description. It is a clear and deep green well, half a mile long and a mile and three quarters in circumference, and contains about sixty-one and a half acres; a perennial spring in the midst of pine and oak woods, without any visible inlet or outlet except by the clouds and evaporation. The surrounding hills rise abruptly from the water to the height of forty to eighty feet, though on the south-east and east they attain to about one hundred and one hundred and fifty feet respectively, within a quarter and a third of a mile. They are exclusively woodland. All our Concord waters have two colors at least; one when viewed at a distance, and another, more proper, close at hand. The first depends more on the light, and follows the sky. In clear weather, in summer, they appear blue at a little distance, especially if agitated, and at a great distance all appear alike. In stormy weather they are sometimes of a dark slate color. The sea, however, is said to be blue one day and green another without any perceptible change in the atmosphere. I have seen our river, when, the landscape being covered with snow, both water and ice were almost as green as grass. Some consider blue “to be the color of pure water, whether liquid or solid.” But, looking directly down into our waters from a boat, they are seen to be of very different colors. Walden is blue at one time and green at another, even from the same point of view. Lying between the earth and the heavens, it partakes of the color of both. Viewed from a hill-top it reflects the color of the sky; but near at hand it is of a yellowish tint next the shore where you can see the sand, then a light green, which gradually deepens to a uniform dark green in the body of the pond. In some lights, viewed even from a hill-top, it is of a vivid green next the shore. Some have referred this to the reflection of the verdure; but it is equally green there against the railroad sand-bank, and in the spring, before the leaves are expanded, and it may be simply the result of the prevailing blue mixed with the yellow of the sand. Such is the color of its iris. This is that portion, also, where in the spring, the ice being warmed by the heat of the sun reflected from the bottom, and also transmitted through the earth, melts first and forms a narrow canal about the still frozen middle. Like the rest of our waters, when much agitated, in clear weather, so that the surface of the waves may reflect the sky at the right angle, or because there is more light mixed with it, it appears at a little distance of a darker blue than the sky itself; and at such a time, being on its surface, and looking with divided vision, so as to see the reflection, I have discerned a matchless and indescribable light blue, such as watered or changeable silks and sword blades suggest, more cerulean than the sky itself, alternating with the original dark green on the opposite sides of the waves, which last appeared but muddy in comparison. It is a vitreous greenish blue, as I remember it, like those patches of the winter sky seen through cloud vistas in the west before sundown. Yet a single glass of its water held up to the light is as colorless as an equal quantity of air. It is well known that a large plate of glass will have a green tint, owing, as the makers say, to its “body,” but a small piece of the same will be colorless. How large a body of Walden water would be required to reflect a green tint I have never proved. The water of our river is black or a very dark brown to one looking directly down on it, and, like that of most ponds, imparts to the body of one bathing in it a yellowish tinge; but this water is of such crystalline purity that the body of the bather appears of an alabaster whiteness, still more unnatural, which, as the limbs are magnified and distorted withal, produces a monstrous effect, making fit studies for a Michael Angelo.

The scenery at Walden is modest, and while it’s very beautiful, it doesn’t reach the level of grandeur and likely won’t impress anyone who hasn’t spent a lot of time there or lived by its shores. However, this pond is so noteworthy for its depth and clarity that it deserves a detailed description. It’s a clear, deep green water that stretches half a mile long and has a circumference of a mile and three-quarters, covering about sixty-one and a half acres; a constant spring surrounded by pine and oak woods, with no visible inlet or outlet except through clouds and evaporation. The hills around it rise steeply from the water, reaching heights of forty to eighty feet, and on the southeast and east, they rise to about one hundred and one hundred and fifty feet respectively, within a quarter and a third of a mile. These hills are all forested. All the waters in Concord have at least two colors; one when viewed from afar, and a more accurate one up close. The first color is mainly influenced by the light and reflects the sky. On clear summer days, from a distance, they look blue, especially when stirred up, and from far away, they all seem the same. In stormy weather, they can appear dark slate. The sea, on the other hand, is said to be blue one day and green the next without any noticeable change in the atmosphere. I’ve seen our river, when the landscape is blanketed in snow, where both the water and ice look almost as green as grass. Some people argue that blue is “the color of pure water, whether liquid or solid.” But when you look straight down into our waters from a boat, you see a variety of colors. Walden can look blue at one time and green at another, even from the same spot. Situated between the earth and the sky, it reflects the colors of both. When seen from a hilltop, it mirrors the sky’s color; but up close, it has a yellowish tint by the shore where you can see the sand, transitioning to light green, which deepens to a uniform dark green in the pond’s body. In certain lights, even from a hilltop, it can look bright green near the shore. Some attribute this to the reflection of the greenery; however, it looks equally green against the railroad sandbank, and in the spring, before the leaves fully develop, it might just be the blue mixed with the yellow of the sand. That’s the color of its iris. This is also the area where, in spring, the ice thaws first because of the sun’s warmth that reflects off the bottom and radiates through the earth, creating a narrow channel around the still frozen center. Like other waters, when stirred up in clear weather, making the wave surface reflect the sky at the right angle, it can appear a darker blue than the sky itself from a slight distance; and in those moments, being on its surface and looking with divided vision to catch the reflection, I’ve noticed an unmatched and indescribable light blue—like the watery sheen of changeable silks and sword blades, even more cerulean than the sky, switching with the original dark green on opposite sides of the waves, which last looked muddy in comparison. It has a glassy greenish blue quality that I remember, reminiscent of patches of the winter sky seen through clouds in the west before sunset. Still, a single glass of its water held up to the light is as colorless as an equal volume of air. It’s well known that a large sheet of glass can appear green, which the manufacturers attribute to its “body,” but a smaller piece will be colorless. I’ve never tested how large a volume of Walden water would need to be to show a green tint. The water in our river looks black or very dark brown if you gaze directly down at it, and like most ponds, it gives anyone swimming in it a yellowish hue; but this water is so crystal clear that the person swimming appears alabaster white, which looks even more unnatural. As their limbs are magnified and distorted, it creates a bizarre effect, offering perfect subjects for a Michael Angelo.

The water is so transparent that the bottom can easily be discerned at the depth of twenty-five or thirty feet. Paddling over it, you may see, many feet beneath the surface the schools of perch and shiners, perhaps only an inch long, yet the former easily distinguished by their transverse bars, and you think that they must be ascetic fish that find a subsistence there. Once, in the winter, many years ago, when I had been cutting holes through the ice in order to catch pickerel, as I stepped ashore I tossed my axe back on to the ice, but, as if some evil genius had directed it, it slid four or five rods directly into one of the holes, where the water was twenty-five feet deep. Out of curiosity, I lay down on the ice and looked through the hole, until I saw the axe a little on one side, standing on its head, with its helve erect and gently swaying to and fro with the pulse of the pond; and there it might have stood erect and swaying till in the course of time the handle rotted off, if I had not disturbed it. Making another hole directly over it with an ice chisel which I had, and cutting down the longest birch which I could find in the neighborhood with my knife, I made a slip-noose, which I attached to its end, and, letting it down carefully, passed it over the knob of the handle, and drew it by a line along the birch, and so pulled the axe out again.

The water is so clear that you can easily see the bottom at a depth of twenty-five or thirty feet. As you paddle over it, you might spot schools of perch and shiners, which are only about an inch long, but the perch are easy to identify by their stripes, making you think they must be minimalist fish thriving in that environment. Once, many winters ago, while I was cutting holes in the ice to catch pickerel, I tossed my axe onto the ice as I stepped ashore. But, as if some mischievous force guided it, it slid four or five rods straight into one of the holes, where the water was twenty-five feet deep. Out of curiosity, I lay down on the ice and peered through the hole until I spotted the axe a little off to the side, standing on its head, its handle upright and gently swaying with the movement of the pond. It could have remained there, swaying, until the handle eventually rotted away if I hadn’t disturbed it. I made another hole right above it with an ice chisel I had, and after cutting down the tallest birch I could find nearby with my knife, I fashioned a slip-noose, attached it to the end of the birch, and carefully lowered it to loop over the knob of the axe handle, then pulled the axe out again using the birch as a lever.

The shore is composed of a belt of smooth rounded white stones like paving stones, excepting one or two short sand beaches, and is so steep that in many places a single leap will carry you into water over your head; and were it not for its remarkable transparency, that would be the last to be seen of its bottom till it rose on the opposite side. Some think it is bottomless. It is nowhere muddy, and a casual observer would say that there were no weeds at all in it; and of noticeable plants, except in the little meadows recently overflowed, which do not properly belong to it, a closer scrutiny does not detect a flag nor a bulrush, nor even a lily, yellow or white, but only a few small heart-leaves and potamogetons, and perhaps a water-target or two; all which however a bather might not perceive; and these plants are clean and bright like the element they grow in. The stones extend a rod or two into the water, and then the bottom is pure sand, except in the deepest parts, where there is usually a little sediment, probably from the decay of the leaves which have been wafted on to it so many successive falls, and a bright green weed is brought up on anchors even in midwinter.

The shore is made up of a strip of smooth, round white stones like paving stones, with just a couple of small sandy beaches, and is so steep that in many places a single jump will plunge you into water over your head; and if it weren't for how clear it is, you wouldn’t see the bottom again until it rises on the other side. Some people believe it’s bottomless. There’s no mud anywhere, and a casual observer might think there are no weeds at all in it; and except for some noticeable plants in the little meadows recently flooded—which don’t really belong to it—a closer look doesn’t reveal any flags, bulrushes, or even lilies, yellow or white, but only a few small heart-shaped leaves and potamogetons, and maybe a water-target or two; all of which a swimmer might easily miss; and these plants are clean and bright like the water they grow in. The stones stretch a rod or two into the water, and then the bottom is pure sand, except in the deepest parts, where there’s usually a little sediment, probably from the decaying leaves that have blown onto it over many falls, and bright green weeds are even brought up by anchors in midwinter.

We have one other pond just like this, White Pond, in Nine Acre Corner, about two and a half miles westerly; but, though I am acquainted with most of the ponds within a dozen miles of this centre I do not know a third of this pure and well-like character. Successive nations perchance have drank at, admired, and fathomed it, and passed away, and still its water is green and pellucid as ever. Not an intermitting spring! Perhaps on that spring morning when Adam and Eve were driven out of Eden Walden Pond was already in existence, and even then breaking up in a gentle spring rain accompanied with mist and a southerly wind, and covered with myriads of ducks and geese, which had not heard of the fall, when still such pure lakes sufficed them. Even then it had commenced to rise and fall, and had clarified its waters and colored them of the hue they now wear, and obtained a patent of heaven to be the only Walden Pond in the world and distiller of celestial dews. Who knows in how many unremembered nations’ literatures this has been the Castalian Fountain? or what nymphs presided over it in the Golden Age? It is a gem of the first water which Concord wears in her coronet.

We have another pond just like this one, White Pond, in Nine Acre Corner, about two and a half miles to the west. Although I know most of the ponds within a dozen miles of here, I haven’t come across a third one with this kind of purity and appeal. Over time, different cultures may have appreciated and explored it, and then moved on, yet its water remains as green and clear as ever. It’s not a spring that runs intermittently! Maybe on that spring morning when Adam and Eve were kicked out of Eden, Walden Pond was already there, gently stirred by a soft spring rain along with mist and a warm south wind, filled with countless ducks and geese who were unaware of the fall, when such pristine lakes were still enough for them. Even then, it had started to rise and fall, clarified its waters, and taken on the beautiful color it has now, earning its unique place in the world as the one and only Walden Pond—the source of heavenly dews. Who knows how many forgotten cultures have regarded this as the Castalian Fountain in their literature? Or which nymphs looked over it during the Golden Age? It’s a precious gem that Concord proudly wears in her crown.

Yet perchance the first who came to this well have left some trace of their footsteps. I have been surprised to detect encircling the pond, even where a thick wood has just been cut down on the shore, a narrow shelf-like path in the steep hill-side, alternately rising and falling, approaching and receding from the water’s edge, as old probably as the race of man here, worn by the feet of aboriginal hunters, and still from time to time unwittingly trodden by the present occupants of the land. This is particularly distinct to one standing on the middle of the pond in winter, just after a light snow has fallen, appearing as a clear undulating white line, unobscured by weeds and twigs, and very obvious a quarter of a mile off in many places where in summer it is hardly distinguishable close at hand. The snow reprints it, as it were, in clear white type alto-relievo. The ornamented grounds of villas which will one day be built here may still preserve some trace of this.

Yet perhaps the first people who came to this well have left some trace of their footsteps. I've been surprised to notice a narrow, shelf-like path around the pond, even where a dense forest has just been cleared on the shore. It rises and falls along the steep hillside, coming closer to and then pulling away from the water's edge, probably as old as humankind here, worn down by the feet of early hunters, and still occasionally trodden by the current inhabitants of the land. This path is especially clear when you're standing in the middle of the pond in winter, right after a light snowfall. It appears as a distinct undulating white line, unobstructed by weeds and twigs, and easily visible a quarter of a mile away in many places, while in summer, it's hardly noticeable even up close. The snow highlights it, almost like it's printed in clear white relief. The landscaped grounds of villas that will one day be built here might still show some trace of this.

The pond rises and falls, but whether regularly or not, and within what period, nobody knows, though, as usual, many pretend to know. It is commonly higher in the winter and lower in the summer, though not corresponding to the general wet and dryness. I can remember when it was a foot or two lower, and also when it was at least five feet higher, than when I lived by it. There is a narrow sand-bar running into it, with very deep water on one side, on which I helped boil a kettle of chowder, some six rods from the main shore, about the year 1824, which it has not been possible to do for twenty-five years; and on the other hand, my friends used to listen with incredulity when I told them, that a few years later I was accustomed to fish from a boat in a secluded cove in the woods, fifteen rods from the only shore they knew, which place was long since converted into a meadow. But the pond has risen steadily for two years, and now, in the summer of ’52, is just five feet higher than when I lived there, or as high as it was thirty years ago, and fishing goes on again in the meadow. This makes a difference of level, at the outside, of six or seven feet; and yet the water shed by the surrounding hills is insignificant in amount, and this overflow must be referred to causes which affect the deep springs. This same summer the pond has begun to fall again. It is remarkable that this fluctuation, whether periodical or not, appears thus to require many years for its accomplishment. I have observed one rise and a part of two falls, and I expect that a dozen or fifteen years hence the water will again be as low as I have ever known it. Flint’s Pond, a mile eastward, allowing for the disturbance occasioned by its inlets and outlets, and the smaller intermediate ponds also, sympathize with Walden, and recently attained their greatest height at the same time with the latter. The same is true, as far as my observation goes, of White Pond.

The pond goes up and down, but whether it does so consistently or not, and over what time frame, nobody really knows, even though many act like they do. Usually, it’s higher in the winter and lower in the summer, but that doesn’t always match the overall wet or dry seasons. I remember when the water level was a foot or two lower, and also when it was at least five feet higher than when I lived nearby. There is a narrow sandbar extending into it, with very deep water on one side, where I helped boil a kettle of chowder about six rods from the main shore around 1824, something that hasn't happened in twenty-five years; meanwhile, my friends used to doubt me when I said that a few years later, I used to fish from a boat in a secluded cove in the woods, fifteen rods from the only shore they knew, which has long been turned into a meadow. But the pond has been rising steadily for two years, and now, in the summer of ’52, it’s just five feet higher than when I lived there, or as high as it was thirty years ago, and fishing is happening again in the meadow. This creates a level difference, at most, of six or seven feet; yet, the water draining from the surrounding hills is minimal, so this overflow must be due to factors affecting the deep springs. This summer, the pond has started to drop again. It’s interesting that this fluctuation, whether regular or not, seems to take many years to complete. I've noticed one rise and part of two falls, and I expect that in about twelve to fifteen years, the water will be as low as I’ve ever seen it. Flint’s Pond, a mile to the east, accounting for the disturbances from its inlets and outlets, as well as the smaller ponds in between, mirrors Walden's behavior and recently reached its highest level at the same time. The same is true, as far as I can tell, for White Pond.

This rise and fall of Walden at long intervals serves this use at least; the water standing at this great height for a year or more, though it makes it difficult to walk round it, kills the shrubs and trees which have sprung up about its edge since the last rise, pitch-pines, birches, alders, aspens, and others, and, falling again, leaves an unobstructed shore; for, unlike many ponds and all waters which are subject to a daily tide, its shore is cleanest when the water is lowest. On the side of the pond next my house, a row of pitch pines fifteen feet high has been killed and tipped over as if by a lever, and thus a stop put to their encroachments; and their size indicates how many years have elapsed since the last rise to this height. By this fluctuation the pond asserts its title to a shore, and thus the shore is shorn, and the trees cannot hold it by right of possession. These are the lips of the lake on which no beard grows. It licks its chaps from time to time. When the water is at its height, the alders, willows, and maples send forth a mass of fibrous red roots several feet long from all sides of their stems in the water, and to the height of three or four feet from the ground, in the effort to maintain themselves; and I have known the high-blueberry bushes about the shore, which commonly produce no fruit, bear an abundant crop under these circumstances.

The rise and fall of Walden over long periods serves at least one purpose; when the water stays at such a high level for a year or more, it makes it hard to walk around but also kills the shrubs and trees that have grown along its edge since the last rise—pitch pines, birches, alders, aspens, and others. When the water recedes, it leaves behind a clear shoreline. Unlike many ponds and all waters that experience daily tides, its shore is cleanest when the water is at its lowest. On the side of the pond next to my house, a row of fifteen-foot-tall pitch pines has been killed and toppled as if by a lever, halting their spread. Their size shows how many years have passed since the last rise to this level. Through this fluctuation, the pond claims its rightful shore, thus the shore is shorn, and the trees can't claim it by right of possession. These are the edges of the lake, where no vegetation grows. It sometimes licks its lips. When the water is at its highest, the alders, willows, and maples grow long, fibrous red roots several feet long from all sides of their trunks in the water, reaching up three or four feet from the ground to keep themselves stable. I've even seen the high blueberry bushes by the shore, which usually don’t bear fruit, yield a plentiful harvest under these conditions.

Some have been puzzled to tell how the shore became so regularly paved. My townsmen have all heard the tradition, the oldest people tell me that they heard it in their youth, that anciently the Indians were holding a pow-wow upon a hill here, which rose as high into the heavens as the pond now sinks deep into the earth, and they used much profanity, as the story goes, though this vice is one of which the Indians were never guilty, and while they were thus engaged the hill shook and suddenly sank, and only one old squaw, named Walden, escaped, and from her the pond was named. It has been conjectured that when the hill shook these stones rolled down its side and became the present shore. It is very certain, at any rate, that once there was no pond here, and now there is one; and this Indian fable does not in any respect conflict with the account of that ancient settler whom I have mentioned, who remembers so well when he first came here with his divining rod, saw a thin vapor rising from the sward, and the hazel pointed steadily downward, and he concluded to dig a well here. As for the stones, many still think that they are hardly to be accounted for by the action of the waves on these hills; but I observe that the surrounding hills are remarkably full of the same kind of stones, so that they have been obliged to pile them up in walls on both sides of the railroad cut nearest the pond; and, moreover, there are most stones where the shore is most abrupt; so that, unfortunately, it is no longer a mystery to me. I detect the paver. If the name was not derived from that of some English locality,—Saffron Walden, for instance,—one might suppose that it was called originally Walled-in Pond.

Some people have been puzzled about how the shore became so perfectly paved. Everyone in my town knows the old story; the oldest residents tell me they heard it when they were young. It goes that long ago, the Native Americans were having a gathering on a hill here, which reached high into the sky, like how the pond now dips deep into the ground. They reportedly used a lot of foul language, though this is something the Native Americans were never really known for. While they were engaged in this activity, the hill shook and suddenly collapsed, leaving only one old woman, named Walden, who survived. That's how the pond got its name. It's been suggested that when the hill shook, the stones rolled down its side and formed the current shore. It’s quite certain that there wasn’t a pond here at one time, and now there is; this Indian legend doesn't contradict the story of the early settler I mentioned, who recalls coming here with his dowsing rod, seeing a faint mist rising from the ground, and noticing that the hazel twig pointed straight down, leading him to decide to dig a well here. As for the stones, many still think they can't be explained solely by the waves acting on these hills. However, I've noticed that the surrounding hills are filled with the same type of stones, so much so that they've had to pile them up into walls on both sides of the railroad cut closest to the pond. Moreover, the most stones are where the shore is the steepest, so it’s unfortunately no longer a mystery to me. I can see who did the paving. If the name wasn’t taken from some English place—like Saffron Walden, for example—one might think it was originally called Walled-in Pond.

The pond was my well ready dug. For four months in the year its water is as cold as it is pure at all times; and I think that it is then as good as any, if not the best, in the town. In the winter, all water which is exposed to the air is colder than springs and wells which are protected from it. The temperature of the pond water which had stood in the room where I sat from five o’clock in the afternoon till noon the next day, the sixth of March, 1846, the thermometer having been up to 65° or 70° some of the time, owing partly to the sun on the roof, was 42°, or one degree colder than the water of one of the coldest wells in the village just drawn. The temperature of the Boiling Spring the same day was 45°, or the warmest of any water tried, though it is the coldest that I know of in summer, when, beside, shallow and stagnant surface water is not mingled with it. Moreover, in summer, Walden never becomes so warm as most water which is exposed to the sun, on account of its depth. In the warmest weather I usually placed a pailful in my cellar, where it became cool in the night, and remained so during the day; though I also resorted to a spring in the neighborhood. It was as good when a week old as the day it was dipped, and had no taste of the pump. Whoever camps for a week in summer by the shore of a pond, needs only bury a pail of water a few feet deep in the shade of his camp to be independent of the luxury of ice.

The pond was my own private well. For four months of the year, its water is as cold as it is always pure; I believe it's just as good, if not the best, in town. In winter, all water exposed to the air is colder than springs and wells that are sheltered from it. The pond water that sat in the room where I was from five o’clock in the afternoon until noon the next day, March 6, 1846, reached temperatures of 65° or 70° at times, partly due to the sun on the roof, but it measured 42°, which is one degree colder than the water from one of the coldest wells in the village that was just drawn. The temperature of the Boiling Spring that same day was 45°, making it the warmest of any water tested, even though it's the coldest in summer when shallow, stagnant surface water isn’t mixed in. Additionally, in summer, Walden never gets as warm as most water exposed to the sun because of its depth. During the hottest weather, I would typically put a bucket of water in my cellar, where it cooled overnight and stayed that way during the day; though I also went to a nearby spring. The water was just as good a week later as the day it was drawn and had no taste from the pump. Anyone camping by a pond in summer only needs to bury a bucket of water a few feet deep in the shade of their camp to be free from the luxury of ice.

There have been caught in Walden pickerel, one weighing seven pounds, to say nothing of another which carried off a reel with great velocity, which the fisherman safely set down at eight pounds because he did not see him, perch and pouts, some of each weighing over two pounds, shiners, chivins or roach (Leuciscus pulchellus), a very few breams, and a couple of eels, one weighing four pounds,—I am thus particular because the weight of a fish is commonly its only title to fame, and these are the only eels I have heard of here;—also, I have a faint recollection of a little fish some five inches long, with silvery sides and a greenish back, somewhat dace-like in its character, which I mention here chiefly to link my facts to fable. Nevertheless, this pond is not very fertile in fish. Its pickerel, though not abundant, are its chief boast. I have seen at one time lying on the ice pickerel of at least three different kinds; a long and shallow one, steel-colored, most like those caught in the river; a bright golden kind, with greenish reflections and remarkably deep, which is the most common here; and another, golden-colored, and shaped like the last, but peppered on the sides with small dark brown or black spots, intermixed with a few faint blood-red ones, very much like a trout. The specific name reticulatus would not apply to this; it should be guttatus rather. These are all very firm fish, and weigh more than their size promises. The shiners, pouts, and perch also, and indeed all the fishes which inhabit this pond, are much cleaner, handsomer, and firmer fleshed than those in the river and most other ponds, as the water is purer, and they can easily be distinguished from them. Probably many ichthyologists would make new varieties of some of them. There are also a clean race of frogs and tortoises, and a few muscels in it; muskrats and minks leave their traces about it, and occasionally a travelling mud-turtle visits it. Sometimes, when I pushed off my boat in the morning, I disturbed a great mud-turtle which had secreted himself under the boat in the night. Ducks and geese frequent it in the spring and fall, the white-bellied swallows (Hirundo bicolor) skim over it, and the peetweets (Totanus macularius) “teter” along its stony shores all summer. I have sometimes disturbed a fishhawk sitting on a white-pine over the water; but I doubt if it is ever profaned by the wing of a gull, like Fair Haven. At most, it tolerates one annual loon. These are all the animals of consequence which frequent it now.

Pickerel have been caught in Walden, including one that weighed seven pounds, and another that took off with a reel so quickly that the fisherman guessed it weighed eight pounds without seeing it. There are also perch and pouts, some over two pounds, shiners, chivins or roach (Leuciscus pulchellus), a few breams, and a couple of eels, one weighing four pounds. I mention this specifically because the weight of a fish is often its only claim to fame, and these are the only eels I've heard of here. Additionally, I vaguely remember a small fish about five inches long, with silvery sides and a greenish back, somewhat resembling a dace, which I mention mainly to tie my observations to folklore. Still, this pond isn't very rich in fish. Its pickerel, though not plentiful, are its main attraction. I've seen at one time lying on the ice pickerel of at least three different types: a long and shallow steel-colored one, similar to those caught in the river; a bright golden one with greenish reflections that is the most common here; and another golden-colored one shaped like the last but speckled on the sides with small dark brown or black spots, alongside a few faint blood-red ones, resembling a trout. The specific name reticulatus wouldn't fit this; it should be guttatus instead. All of these are very firm fish, and they weigh more than their size suggests. The shiners, pouts, perch, and indeed all the fish in this pond are much cleaner, prettier, and have firmer flesh than those in the river and most other ponds, thanks to the purer water, making them easy to distinguish. Many ichthyologists might even classify some of them as new varieties. There are also a clean breed of frogs and turtles, and a few mussels in it; muskrats and minks leave their traces around, and occasionally a traveling mud turtle pays a visit. Sometimes, when I pushed off my boat in the morning, I’d disturb a large mud turtle that had hidden under my boat during the night. Ducks and geese visit in the spring and fall, white-bellied swallows (Hirundo bicolor) skim over it, and the peetweets (Totanus macularius) “teter” along its rocky shores all summer. I’ve sometimes startled a fishhawk sitting on a white pine over the water; however, I doubt it’s ever disturbed by gulls, unlike Fair Haven. At most, it accommodates one annual loon. These are all the significant animals that frequent it now.

You may see from a boat, in calm weather, near the sandy eastern shore, where the water is eight or ten feet deep, and also in some other parts of the pond, some circular heaps half a dozen feet in diameter by a foot in height, consisting of small stones less than a hen’s egg in size, where all around is bare sand. At first you wonder if the Indians could have formed them on the ice for any purpose, and so, when the ice melted, they sank to the bottom; but they are too regular and some of them plainly too fresh for that. They are similar to those found in rivers; but as there are no suckers nor lampreys here, I know not by what fish they could be made. Perhaps they are the nests of the chivin. These lend a pleasing mystery to the bottom.

You can see from a boat, on a calm day, near the sandy eastern shore, where the water is eight to ten feet deep, and in some other parts of the pond, some circular mounds about six feet in diameter and a foot high, made up of small stones that are smaller than a hen’s egg, surrounded by bare sand. At first, you might wonder if the Native Americans could have created them on the ice for some reason, and then when the ice melted, they sank to the bottom; but they're too regular and some clearly look too recent for that. They’re similar to those found in rivers; but since there are no suckers or lampreys here, I have no idea what fish could have made them. Maybe they are the nests of the chivin. These add an intriguing mystery to the pond's bottom.

The shore is irregular enough not to be monotonous. I have in my mind’s eye the western indented with deep bays, the bolder northern, and the beautifully scalloped southern shore, where successive capes overlap each other and suggest unexplored coves between. The forest has never so good a setting, nor is so distinctly beautiful, as when seen from the middle of a small lake amid hills which rise from the water’s edge; for the water in which it is reflected not only makes the best foreground in such a case, but, with its winding shore, the most natural and agreeable boundary to it. There is no rawness nor imperfection in its edge there, as where the axe has cleared a part, or a cultivated field abuts on it. The trees have ample room to expand on the water side, and each sends forth its most vigorous branch in that direction. There Nature has woven a natural selvage, and the eye rises by just gradations from the low shrubs of the shore to the highest trees. There are few traces of man’s hand to be seen. The water laves the shore as it did a thousand years ago.

The shoreline is varied enough to keep it interesting. I picture the western part with its deep bays, the more rugged northern section, and the beautifully rounded southern coast, where consecutive capes overlap and hint at undiscovered coves in between. The forest has never looked as good or been as clearly beautiful as when viewed from the center of a small lake surrounded by hills that rise from the water's edge; the water it reflects not only makes the best foreground in this situation, but its winding shore also creates the most natural and pleasing boundary. There’s no roughness or imperfection at the edge there, unlike where the axe has cleared an area or where a cultivated field meets it. The trees have plenty of space to spread out toward the water, and each one extends its strongest branches in that direction. There, Nature has crafted a natural border, and the view gradually rises from the low shrubs along the shore to the tallest trees. There are few signs of human influence. The water washes the shore just like it did a thousand years ago.

A lake is the landscape’s most beautiful and expressive feature. It is earth’s eye; looking into which the beholder measures the depth of his own nature. The fluviatile trees next the shore are the slender eyelashes which fringe it, and the wooded hills and cliffs around are its overhanging brows.

A lake is the most beautiful and expressive feature of the landscape. It’s like the earth’s eye; when you look into it, you reflect on the depths of your own nature. The trees by the shore are like slender eyelashes framing it, and the wooded hills and cliffs surrounding it are its overhanging brows.

Standing on the smooth sandy beach at the east end of the pond, in a calm September afternoon, when a slight haze makes the opposite shore line indistinct, I have seen whence came the expression, “the glassy surface of a lake.” When you invert your head, it looks like a thread of finest gossamer stretched across the valley, and gleaming against the distant pine woods, separating one stratum of the atmosphere from another. You would think that you could walk dry under it to the opposite hills, and that the swallows which skim over might perch on it. Indeed, they sometimes dive below this line, as it were by mistake, and are undeceived. As you look over the pond westward you are obliged to employ both your hands to defend your eyes against the reflected as well as the true sun, for they are equally bright; and if, between the two, you survey its surface critically, it is literally as smooth as glass, except where the skater insects, at equal intervals scattered over its whole extent, by their motions in the sun produce the finest imaginable sparkle on it, or, perchance, a duck plumes itself, or, as I have said, a swallow skims so low as to touch it. It may be that in the distance a fish describes an arc of three or four feet in the air, and there is one bright flash where it emerges, and another where it strikes the water; sometimes the whole silvery arc is revealed; or here and there, perhaps, is a thistle-down floating on its surface, which the fishes dart at and so dimple it again. It is like molten glass cooled but not congealed, and the few motes in it are pure and beautiful like the imperfections in glass. You may often detect a yet smoother and darker water, separated from the rest as if by an invisible cobweb, boom of the water nymphs, resting on it. From a hill-top you can see a fish leap in almost any part; for not a pickerel or shiner picks an insect from this smooth surface but it manifestly disturbs the equilibrium of the whole lake. It is wonderful with what elaborateness this simple fact is advertised,—this piscine murder will out,—and from my distant perch I distinguish the circling undulations when they are half a dozen rods in diameter. You can even detect a water-bug (Gyrinus) ceaselessly progressing over the smooth surface a quarter of a mile off; for they furrow the water slightly, making a conspicuous ripple bounded by two diverging lines, but the skaters glide over it without rippling it perceptibly. When the surface is considerably agitated there are no skaters nor water-bugs on it, but apparently, in calm days, they leave their havens and adventurously glide forth from the shore by short impulses till they completely cover it. It is a soothing employment, on one of those fine days in the fall when all the warmth of the sun is fully appreciated, to sit on a stump on such a height as this, overlooking the pond, and study the dimpling circles which are incessantly inscribed on its otherwise invisible surface amid the reflected skies and trees. Over this great expanse there is no disturbance but it is thus at once gently smoothed away and assuaged, as, when a vase of water is jarred, the trembling circles seek the shore and all is smooth again. Not a fish can leap or an insect fall on the pond but it is thus reported in circling dimples, in lines of beauty, as it were the constant welling up of its fountain, the gentle pulsing of its life, the heaving of its breast. The thrills of joy and thrills of pain are undistinguishable. How peaceful the phenomena of the lake! Again the works of man shine as in the spring. Ay, every leaf and twig and stone and cobweb sparkles now at mid-afternoon as when covered with dew in a spring morning. Every motion of an oar or an insect produces a flash of light; and if an oar falls, how sweet the echo!

Standing on the smooth sandy beach at the east end of the pond on a calm September afternoon, when a slight haze makes the opposite shoreline blurry, I’ve understood where the saying “the glassy surface of a lake” comes from. When you tilt your head, it looks like a delicate thread stretched across the valley, shimmering against the distant pine trees, separating one layer of the atmosphere from another. You’d think you could walk dry under it to the opposite hills, and that the swallows skimming over might land on it. In fact, they sometimes dive below this line, almost by accident, and realize their mistake. As you look over the pond to the west, you have to use both your hands to shield your eyes from the reflections and the actual sun, as both are equally bright; and if you critically examine its surface between the two, it truly is as smooth as glass, except where skater insects, evenly spaced throughout its extent, create the most exquisite sparkles with their movements in the sun, or perhaps a duck preens itself, or, as I mentioned, a swallow skims so low that it touches the surface. It’s possible that in the distance, a fish jumps three or four feet into the air, and you see one bright flash as it breaks the surface and another when it hits the water; sometimes the whole silvery arc is visible; or here and there, you might spot a thistle-down floating on the surface, which the fish dart at, causing it to ripple again. It resembles molten glass that has cooled but not solidified, and the few specks in it are pure and beautiful like the imperfections in glass. You can often spot an even smoother and darker patch of water, separated from the rest as if by an invisible cobweb, the resting place of water nymphs. From a hilltop, you can see a fish leap from almost anywhere; for not a pickerel or shiner picks an insect from this smooth surface without clearly disturbing the balance of the entire lake. It’s remarkable how elaborately this simple fact is displayed—this fishy murder won’t stay hidden—and from my distant vantage point, I notice the rippling circles when they measure half a dozen rods in diameter. You can even spot a water-bug (Gyrinus) constantly moving over the smooth surface a quarter of a mile away; they slightly disturb the water, leaving a visible ripple shaped by two diverging lines, but the skaters glide over it without making any noticeable ripple. When the surface is significantly disturbed, there are no skaters or water-bugs on it; however, on calm days, they venture out from their shelters, adventurously gliding away from the shore in short bursts until they completely cover it. It’s a soothing activity on those beautiful fall days when you fully appreciate the warmth of the sun, to sit on a stump at such a height overlooking the pond and observe the tiny circles that continuously form on its otherwise invisible surface, amidst the reflected skies and trees. Over this vast expanse, there’s no disturbance; it smoothly settles down as, when a vase of water is jostled, the trembling circles seek the shore, and everything becomes calm again. Not a fish can leap or an insect fall onto the pond without it being reported in rippling circles, in lines of beauty, like the constant bubbling of its fountain, the gentle pulsing of its life, the rising and falling of its breath. The feelings of joy and pain are indistinguishable. How peaceful are the phenomena of the lake! Once again, the works of man shine just as they do in spring. Yes, every leaf, twig, stone, and cobweb sparkles now in the mid-afternoon sun as if covered in dew on a spring morning. Every motion of an oar or an insect creates a flash of light, and if an oar drops, how sweet the echo!

In such a day, in September or October, Walden is a perfect forest mirror, set round with stones as precious to my eye as if fewer or rarer. Nothing so fair, so pure, and at the same time so large, as a lake, perchance, lies on the surface of the earth. Sky water. It needs no fence. Nations come and go without defiling it. It is a mirror which no stone can crack, whose quicksilver will never wear off, whose gilding Nature continually repairs; no storms, no dust, can dim its surface ever fresh;—a mirror in which all impurity presented to it sinks, swept and dusted by the sun’s hazy brush,—this the light dust-cloth,—which retains no breath that is breathed on it, but sends its own to float as clouds high above its surface, and be reflected in its bosom still.

On a day in September or October, Walden is like a perfect forest mirror, surrounded by stones that are as precious to me as if they were fewer or rarer. There's nothing as beautiful, pure, and expansive as a lake, maybe, lying on the earth's surface. Sky water. It needs no fence. Nations rise and fall without tarnishing it. It's a mirror that no stone can crack, whose quicksilver will never fade, and whose gold is constantly renewed by Nature; no storms, no dust can ever dull its always fresh surface;—a mirror where all impurities that touch it sink, cleaned and polished by the sun's hazy brush,—this light dust-cloth,—which doesn't hold onto a single breath that touches it, but sends its own to float as clouds high above, reflected in its depths still.

A field of water betrays the spirit that is in the air. It is continually receiving new life and motion from above. It is intermediate in its nature between land and sky. On land only the grass and trees wave, but the water itself is rippled by the wind. I see where the breeze dashes across it by the streaks or flakes of light. It is remarkable that we can look down on its surface. We shall, perhaps, look down thus on the surface of air at length, and mark where a still subtler spirit sweeps over it.

A body of water reflects the spirit in the air. It constantly absorbs new life and movement from above. It exists in between land and sky. On land, only the grass and trees sway, but the water itself is disturbed by the wind. I can see where the breeze brushes across it by the streaks or flashes of light. It's amazing that we can look down on its surface. Maybe one day we'll be able to look down on the surface of the air too and notice where an even more delicate spirit moves over it.

The skaters and water-bugs finally disappear in the latter part of October, when the severe frosts have come; and then and in November, usually, in a calm day, there is absolutely nothing to ripple the surface. One November afternoon, in the calm at the end of a rain storm of several days’ duration, when the sky was still completely overcast and the air was full of mist, I observed that the pond was remarkably smooth, so that it was difficult to distinguish its surface; though it no longer reflected the bright tints of October, but the sombre November colors of the surrounding hills. Though I passed over it as gently as possible, the slight undulations produced by my boat extended almost as far as I could see, and gave a ribbed appearance to the reflections. But, as I was looking over the surface, I saw here and there at a distance a faint glimmer, as if some skater insects which had escaped the frosts might be collected there, or, perchance, the surface, being so smooth, betrayed where a spring welled up from the bottom. Paddling gently to one of these places, I was surprised to find myself surrounded by myriads of small perch, about five inches long, of a rich bronze color in the green water, sporting there, and constantly rising to the surface and dimpling it, sometimes leaving bubbles on it. In such transparent and seemingly bottomless water, reflecting the clouds, I seemed to be floating through the air as in a balloon, and their swimming impressed me as a kind of flight or hovering, as if they were a compact flock of birds passing just beneath my level on the right or left, their fins, like sails, set all around them. There were many such schools in the pond, apparently improving the short season before winter would draw an icy shutter over their broad skylight, sometimes giving to the surface an appearance as if a slight breeze struck it, or a few rain-drops fell there. When I approached carelessly and alarmed them, they made a sudden splash and rippling with their tails, as if one had struck the water with a brushy bough, and instantly took refuge in the depths. At length the wind rose, the mist increased, and the waves began to run, and the perch leaped much higher than before, half out of water, a hundred black points, three inches long, at once above the surface. Even as late as the fifth of December, one year, I saw some dimples on the surface, and thinking it was going to rain hard immediately, the air being full of mist, I made haste to take my place at the oars and row homeward; already the rain seemed rapidly increasing, though I felt none on my cheek, and I anticipated a thorough soaking. But suddenly the dimples ceased, for they were produced by the perch, which the noise of my oars had seared into the depths, and I saw their schools dimly disappearing; so I spent a dry afternoon after all.

The skaters and water bugs finally vanish in late October when the harsh frosts arrive; then in November, usually on a calm day, the surface is completely still. One November afternoon, after several days of rain, the sky was still totally overcast and the air filled with mist. I noticed that the pond was incredibly smooth, making it hard to see where the surface was. It no longer reflected the bright colors of October, but rather the dull November shades of the surrounding hills. As I glided over it as gently as I could, the small ripples created by my boat spread almost as far as I could see, creating a ribbed look to the reflections. As I gazed over the surface, I noticed faint glimmers here and there in the distance, as if some skater insects that had survived the frosts might be gathered there, or perhaps the smoothness of the surface hinted at a spring bubbling up from the bottom. Paddling quietly to one of these spots, I was surprised to find myself surrounded by swarms of small perch, about five inches long, shimmering a rich bronze in the green water. They were playing and constantly breaking the surface, leaving small bubbles behind. In that clear and seemingly endless water reflecting the clouds, I felt like I was floating through the air as if in a balloon, and their swimming reminded me of a kind of flight or hovering, as if they were a flock of birds passing just below my level, their fins spread out like sails. There were many such schools in the pond, seemingly making the most of the short season before winter would close in over their wide skylight, occasionally causing the surface to look like a slight breeze was stirring it, or as if a few raindrops had fallen there. When I approached carelessly and startled them, they made a sudden splash with their tails, like someone had hit the water with a branch, and quickly dove into the depths. Eventually, the wind picked up, the mist thickened, and the waves started to rise. The perch jumped much higher than before, half-leaping out of the water, a hundred little black spots, three inches long, suddenly breaking the surface. Even as late as December 5th one year, I saw ripples on the surface and, thinking it might rain heavily soon because of the misty air, I hurried to grab the oars and row home. It felt like the rain was quickly intensifying, although I didn’t feel any drops on my cheek, and I expected to get soaked. But then the ripples stopped, caused by the perch that had fled below at the sound of my oars, and I saw their schools gradually fading away; so I ended up having a dry afternoon after all.

An old man who used to frequent this pond nearly sixty years ago, when it was dark with surrounding forests, tells me that in those days he sometimes saw it all alive with ducks and other water fowl, and that there were many eagles about it. He came here a-fishing, and used an old log canoe which he found on the shore. It was made of two white-pine logs dug out and pinned together, and was cut off square at the ends. It was very clumsy, but lasted a great many years before it became water-logged and perhaps sank to the bottom. He did not know whose it was; it belonged to the pond. He used to make a cable for his anchor of strips of hickory bark tied together. An old man, a potter, who lived by the pond before the Revolution, told him once that there was an iron chest at the bottom, and that he had seen it. Sometimes it would come floating up to the shore; but when you went toward it, it would go back into deep water and disappear. I was pleased to hear of the old log canoe, which took the place of an Indian one of the same material but more graceful construction, which perchance had first been a tree on the bank, and then, as it were, fell into the water, to float there for a generation, the most proper vessel for the lake. I remember that when I first looked into these depths there were many large trunks to be seen indistinctly lying on the bottom, which had either been blown over formerly, or left on the ice at the last cutting, when wood was cheaper; but now they have mostly disappeared.

An old man who used to visit this pond nearly sixty years ago, when it was surrounded by dense forests, tells me that back then he often saw it bustling with ducks and other waterfowl, and that there were many eagles around. He came here to fish, using an old log canoe he found on the shore. It was made from two white-pine logs that were hollowed out and pinned together, with the ends cut off square. It was quite clumsy but lasted many years before becoming waterlogged and likely sinking to the bottom. He didn't know who it belonged to; it was just part of the pond. He would make an anchor cable from strips of hickory bark tied together. An old potter who lived by the pond before the Revolution once told him that there was an iron chest at the bottom, and that he had seen it. Sometimes it would float up to the shore, but when you approached it, it would retreat back into the deep water and disappear. I was glad to hear about the old log canoe, which replaced an Indian one made from the same material but with a more graceful design, which perhaps had once been a tree on the bank and then fell into the water, floating there for a generation, the most suitable vessel for the lake. I remember that when I first peered into these depths, I could see many large trunks lying indistinctly on the bottom, which had either been blown over in the past or left on the ice during the last cutting when wood was cheaper; but now they have mostly vanished.

When I first paddled a boat on Walden, it was completely surrounded by thick and lofty pine and oak woods, and in some of its coves grape vines had run over the trees next the water and formed bowers under which a boat could pass. The hills which form its shores are so steep, and the woods on them were then so high, that, as you looked down from the west end, it had the appearance of an amphitheatre for some kind of sylvan spectacle. I have spent many an hour, when I was younger, floating over its surface as the zephyr willed, having paddled my boat to the middle, and lying on my back across the seats, in a summer forenoon, dreaming awake, until I was aroused by the boat touching the sand, and I arose to see what shore my fates had impelled me to; days when idleness was the most attractive and productive industry. Many a forenoon have I stolen away, preferring to spend thus the most valued part of the day; for I was rich, if not in money, in sunny hours and summer days, and spent them lavishly; nor do I regret that I did not waste more of them in the workshop or the teacher’s desk. But since I left those shores the woodchoppers have still further laid them waste, and now for many a year there will be no more rambling through the aisles of the wood, with occasional vistas through which you see the water. My Muse may be excused if she is silent henceforth. How can you expect the birds to sing when their groves are cut down?

When I first paddled a boat on Walden, it was completely surrounded by tall pine and oak woods, and in some of its coves, grapevines had spread over the trees next to the water, forming canopies under which a boat could pass. The hills that border it are so steep, and the woods on them were so tall back then, that when you looked down from the west end, it looked like an amphitheater for some kind of woodland show. I spent many hours in my younger days floating on its surface as the gentle breeze desired, having paddled my boat to the middle and lying back across the seats on a summer morning, dreaming while awake, until the boat nudged the sand, and I sat up to see what shore fate had led me to; days when doing nothing was the most appealing and productive activity. I often sneaked away on those mornings, preferring to spend the best part of the day this way; I was rich, if not in money, then in sunny hours and summer days, and I spent them freely; I don’t regret that I didn’t waste more of them in the workshop or at the teacher’s desk. But since I left those shores, the woodcutters have further destroyed them, and now for many years, there will be no more wandering through the paths of the woods, with occasional views of the water. My Muse can be forgiven if she falls silent from now on. How can you expect the birds to sing when their groves have been cut down?

Now the trunks of trees on the bottom, and the old log canoe, and the dark surrounding woods, are gone, and the villagers, who scarcely know where it lies, instead of going to the pond to bathe or drink, are thinking to bring its water, which should be as sacred as the Ganges at least, to the village in a pipe, to wash their dishes with!—to earn their Walden by the turning of a cock or drawing of a plug! That devilish Iron Horse, whose ear-rending neigh is heard throughout the town, has muddied the Boiling Spring with his foot, and he it is that has browsed off all the woods on Walden shore, that Trojan horse, with a thousand men in his belly, introduced by mercenary Greeks! Where is the country’s champion, the Moore of Moore Hill, to meet him at the Deep Cut and thrust an avenging lance between the ribs of the bloated pest?

Now the tree trunks at the bottom, the old log canoe, and the dark surrounding woods are gone. The villagers, who barely remember where it is, instead of going to the pond to bathe or drink, are thinking about bringing its water—a source that should be at least as sacred as the Ganges—into the village through a pipe to wash their dishes!—to earn their Walden with just a twist of a knob or pulling a plug! That damn Iron Horse, whose deafening whinny can be heard all over town, has muddied the Boiling Spring with its hooves, and it’s the one that has chewed away all the woods along the Walden shore, that Trojan horse, filled with a thousand men, brought in by greedy outsiders! Where is the country’s hero, the Moore of Moore Hill, to confront him at the Deep Cut and drive an avenging spear into the side of that bloated nuisance?

Nevertheless, of all the characters I have known, perhaps Walden wears best, and best preserves its purity. Many men have been likened to it, but few deserve that honor. Though the woodchoppers have laid bare first this shore and then that, and the Irish have built their sties by it, and the railroad has infringed on its border, and the ice-men have skimmed it once, it is itself unchanged, the same water which my youthful eyes fell on; all the change is in me. It has not acquired one permanent wrinkle after all its ripples. It is perennially young, and I may stand and see a swallow dip apparently to pick an insect from its surface as of yore. It struck me again tonight, as if I had not seen it almost daily for more than twenty years,—Why, here is Walden, the same woodland lake that I discovered so many years ago; where a forest was cut down last winter another is springing up by its shore as lustily as ever; the same thought is welling up to its surface that was then; it is the same liquid joy and happiness to itself and its Maker, ay, and it may be to me. It is the work of a brave man surely, in whom there was no guile! He rounded this water with his hand, deepened and clarified it in his thought, and in his will bequeathed it to Concord. I see by its face that it is visited by the same reflection; and I can almost say, Walden, is it you?

Nevertheless, of all the characters I’ve known, maybe Walden stands out the most and keeps its purity the best. Many people have been compared to it, but few actually deserve that compliment. Even though the woodchoppers have cleared this shore and then that, the Irish have built their homes nearby, the railroad has encroached on its edge, and the ice-men have skimmed it once, it remains unchanged, the same water my young eyes first saw; all the change has happened within me. It hasn’t gained a single permanent wrinkle despite all its ripples. It’s eternally young, and I can still watch a swallow dip down as if to catch an insect off its surface just like before. It struck me again tonight, as if I hadn’t seen it almost daily for over twenty years—Why, here’s Walden, the same woodland lake I discovered so many years ago; where a forest was cut down last winter, another is growing back by its shore just as vibrantly as ever; the same thoughts are rising to its surface that were there then; it’s the same liquid joy and happiness for itself and its Creator, and perhaps it may be for me too. It surely is the work of a brave man, one without deceit! He shaped this water with his hand, deepened and clarified it in his mind, and in his will passed it on to Concord. I can see from its surface that it is visited by the same reflection; and I can almost say, Walden, is it really you?

It is no dream of mine,
To ornament a line;
I cannot come nearer to God and Heaven
Than I live to Walden even.
I am its stony shore,
And the breeze that passes o’er;
In the hollow of my hand
Are its water and its sand,
And its deepest resort
Lies high in my thought.

It’s not my dream,
To decorate a line;
I can’t get any closer to God and Heaven
Than I do living by Walden.
I am its stony shore,
And the breeze that flows over;
In the hollow of my hand
Are its water and its sand,
And its deepest place
Lives high in my thoughts.

The cars never pause to look at it; yet I fancy that the engineers and firemen and brakemen, and those passengers who have a season ticket and see it often, are better men for the sight. The engineer does not forget at night, or his nature does not, that he has beheld this vision of serenity and purity once at least during the day. Though seen but once, it helps to wash out State-street and the engine’s soot. One proposes that it be called “God’s Drop.”

The cars never stop to look at it; still, I believe that the engineers, firemen, brakemen, and those passengers with a season ticket who see it frequently are better people for having witnessed it. The engineer doesn’t forget at night, or his nature doesn’t, that he has at least once seen this vision of calm and purity during the day. Even if seen just once, it helps to cleanse State Street and the soot from the engine. One suggests it be named “God’s Drop.”

I have said that Walden has no visible inlet nor outlet, but it is on the one hand distantly and indirectly related to Flint’s Pond, which is more elevated, by a chain of small ponds coming from that quarter, and on the other directly and manifestly to Concord River, which is lower, by a similar chain of ponds through which in some other geological period it may have flowed, and by a little digging, which God forbid, it can be made to flow thither again. If by living thus reserved and austere, like a hermit in the woods, so long, it has acquired such wonderful purity, who would not regret that the comparatively impure waters of Flint’s Pond should be mingled with it, or itself should ever go to waste its sweetness in the ocean wave?

I’ve mentioned that Walden has no obvious inlet or outlet, but it is, on one side, indirectly connected to Flint’s Pond, which is at a higher elevation, by a series of small ponds coming from that direction, and on the other side, it’s directly and obviously linked to the Concord River, which is at a lower level, by a similar chain of ponds through which it may have flowed in a different geological era. With a little digging—which I hope we never do—it could flow back there again. If by living so simply and purely, like a hermit in the woods, it has gained such incredible clarity, who wouldn’t regret that the relatively impure waters of Flint’s Pond should mix with it, or that it should ever waste its sweetness in the ocean waves?

Flint’s, or Sandy Pond, in Lincoln, our greatest lake and inland sea, lies about a mile east of Walden. It is much larger, being said to contain one hundred and ninety-seven acres, and is more fertile in fish; but it is comparatively shallow, and not remarkably pure. A walk through the woods thither was often my recreation. It was worth the while, if only to feel the wind blow on your cheek freely, and see the waves run, and remember the life of mariners. I went a-chestnutting there in the fall, on windy days, when the nuts were dropping into the water and were washed to my feet; and one day, as I crept along its sedgy shore, the fresh spray blowing in my face, I came upon the mouldering wreck of a boat, the sides gone, and hardly more than the impression of its flat bottom left amid the rushes; yet its model was sharply defined, as if it were a large decayed pad, with its veins. It was as impressive a wreck as one could imagine on the sea-shore, and had as good a moral. It is by this time mere vegetable mould and undistinguishable pond shore, through which rushes and flags have pushed up. I used to admire the ripple marks on the sandy bottom, at the north end of this pond, made firm and hard to the feet of the wader by the pressure of the water, and the rushes which grew in Indian file, in waving lines, corresponding to these marks, rank behind rank, as if the waves had planted them. There also I have found, in considerable quantities, curious balls, composed apparently of fine grass or roots, of pipewort perhaps, from half an inch to four inches in diameter, and perfectly spherical. These wash back and forth in shallow water on a sandy bottom, and are sometimes cast on the shore. They are either solid grass, or have a little sand in the middle. At first you would say that they were formed by the action of the waves, like a pebble; yet the smallest are made of equally coarse materials, half an inch long, and they are produced only at one season of the year. Moreover, the waves, I suspect, do not so much construct as wear down a material which has already acquired consistency. They preserve their form when dry for an indefinite period.

Flint’s, or Sandy Pond, in Lincoln, our largest lake and inland sea, is about a mile east of Walden. It is much bigger, reportedly covering one hundred and ninety-seven acres, and has a better supply of fish; however, it's relatively shallow and not exceptionally clear. A walk through the woods there was often a favorite pastime of mine. It was worth it just to feel the wind on your cheek and watch the waves roll in while thinking about the lives of sailors. In the fall, on windy days, I would go chestnutting there, collecting nuts as they fell into the water and floated to my feet; one day, while I was creeping along its grassy shore with the fresh spray hitting my face, I found the decaying remains of a boat, its sides gone and barely more than the imprint of its flat bottom left among the rushes; yet its shape was clearly defined, resembling a large, decayed leaf with its veins. It was an impressive wreck, just like one you might find on the beach, and it carried a significant message. Now, it's just vegetable debris and an indistinct pond shore, overrun by rushes and flags. I used to admire the ripple patterns on the sandy bottom at the north end of this pond, made solid and firm underfoot by the pressure of the water, along with the rushes growing in neat lines, waving in rhythm with these patterns, stacked one behind the other, as if the waves had planted them. I also discovered a fair number of curious balls there, seemingly made of fine grass or roots, perhaps from pipewort, varying from half an inch to four inches in diameter, and perfectly round. These roll back and forth in shallow water over a sandy bottom and sometimes wash up on the shore. They are either solid grass or have a bit of sand inside. At first glance, you might think they were formed by the action of the waves, like pebbles; however, the smallest ones are made of the same coarse materials, half an inch long, and they only form during a specific season. Moreover, I suspect the waves are not so much creating them as wearing down something that has already become solid. They maintain their shape when dry for an indefinite amount of time.

Flint’s Pond! Such is the poverty of our nomenclature. What right had the unclean and stupid farmer, whose farm abutted on this sky water, whose shores he has ruthlessly laid bare, to give his name to it? Some skin-flint, who loved better the reflecting surface of a dollar, or a bright cent, in which he could see his own brazen face; who regarded even the wild ducks which settled in it as trespassers; his fingers grown into crooked and horny talons from the long habit of grasping harpy-like;—so it is not named for me. I go not there to see him nor to hear of him; who never saw it, who never bathed in it, who never loved it, who never protected it, who never spoke a good word for it, nor thanked God that he had made it. Rather let it be named from the fishes that swim in it, the wild fowl or quadrupeds which frequent it, the wild flowers which grow by its shores, or some wild man or child the thread of whose history is interwoven with its own; not from him who could show no title to it but the deed which a like-minded neighbor or legislature gave him,—him who thought only of its money value; whose presence perchance cursed all the shore; who exhausted the land around it, and would fain have exhausted the waters within it; who regretted only that it was not English hay or cranberry meadow,—there was nothing to redeem it, forsooth, in his eyes,—and would have drained and sold it for the mud at its bottom. It did not turn his mill, and it was no privilege to him to behold it. I respect not his labors, his farm where every thing has its price; who would carry the landscape, who would carry his God, to market, if he could get any thing for him; who goes to market for his god as it is; on whose farm nothing grows free, whose fields bear no crops, whose meadows no flowers, whose trees no fruits, but dollars; who loves not the beauty of his fruits, whose fruits are not ripe for him till they are turned to dollars. Give me the poverty that enjoys true wealth. Farmers are respectable and interesting to me in proportion as they are poor,—poor farmers. A model farm! where the house stands like a fungus in a muck-heap, chambers for men, horses, oxen, and swine, cleansed and uncleansed, all contiguous to one another! Stocked with men! A great grease-spot, redolent of manures and buttermilk! Under a high state of cultivation, being manured with the hearts and brains of men! As if you were to raise your potatoes in the church-yard! Such is a model farm.

Flint’s Pond! What a lack of imagination in our naming. What right does the dirty and ignorant farmer, whose land borders this beautiful water, have to call it by his name? Some miser, who values the shiny surface of a dollar or a bright cent more than anything, and sees even the wild ducks that come to it as intruders; his hands have turned into gnarled claws from always grasping like a greedy monster—this body of water is not named after him. I don’t go there to see him or hear about him; he never saw it, never swam in it, never loved it, never cared for it, never said a kind word about it, nor thanked God for creating it. It should be named after the fish that swim in it, the wild birds or animals that visit it, the wildflowers growing along its banks, or some wild person whose life story is connected to it; not after him, who could claim no rights over it except the deed his similarly-minded neighbor or legislature gave him—someone who only saw it for its monetary worth; whose presence probably cursed the entire shore; who depleted the land around it and would have drained the water inside it if he could; who only wished it was English hay or a cranberry meadow—nothing worth saving in his eyes—and would have sold it for the mud at the bottom. It didn’t run his mill, and it wasn’t a privilege for him to see it. I have no respect for his work, his farm where everything is for sale; someone who would sell the landscape, who would sell his God if he could get anything for Him; who goes to market with his god as is; on whose farm nothing grows freely, whose fields have no crops, whose meadows bear no flowers, whose trees yield no fruits, but dollars; who doesn’t appreciate the beauty of what he grows, whose fruits aren’t ripe until they can be turned into dollars. Give me the kind of poverty that enjoys true wealth. Farmers are respectable and interesting to me in proportion to how poor they are—poor farmers. A perfect farm! where the house stands like a fungus in a heap of muck, with living spaces for men, horses, oxen, and pigs, clean and dirty, all next to each other! Stacked with humans! A giant grease stain, filled with the scents of manure and buttermilk! Under a high level of cultivation, manured with the hearts and brains of men! As if you were trying to grow your potatoes in a graveyard! That is a perfect farm.

No, no; if the fairest features of the landscape are to be named after men, let them be the noblest and worthiest men alone. Let our lakes receive as true names at least as the Icarian Sea, where “still the shore” a “brave attempt resounds.”

No, no; if we're going to name the most beautiful parts of the landscape after people, let it be only the noblest and most worthy individuals. Let our lakes have names that are as meaningful as the Icarian Sea, where “still the shore” echoes a “brave attempt.”

Goose Pond, of small extent, is on my way to Flint’s; Fair-Haven, an expansion of Concord River, said to contain some seventy acres, is a mile south-west; and White Pond, of about forty acres, is a mile and a half beyond Fair-Haven. This is my lake country. These, with Concord River, are my water privileges; and night and day, year in year out, they grind such grist as I carry to them.

Goose Pond, which is quite small, is on my way to Flint’s. Fair-Haven, an extension of the Concord River, is said to cover about seventy acres and is a mile southwest. White Pond, around forty acres, is a mile and a half past Fair-Haven. This is my lake area. Together with the Concord River, these are my water resources, and day and night, year after year, they process the things I bring to them.

Since the woodcutters, and the railroad, and I myself have profaned Walden, perhaps the most attractive, if not the most beautiful, of all our lakes, the gem of the woods, is White Pond;—a poor name from its commonness, whether derived from the remarkable purity of its waters or the color of its sands. In these as in other respects, however, it is a lesser twin of Walden. They are so much alike that you would say they must be connected under ground. It has the same stony shore, and its waters are of the same hue. As at Walden, in sultry dog-day weather, looking down through the woods on some of its bays which are not so deep but that the reflection from the bottom tinges them, its waters are of a misty bluish-green or glaucous color. Many years since I used to go there to collect the sand by cart-loads, to make sand-paper with, and I have continued to visit it ever since. One who frequents it proposes to call it Virid Lake. Perhaps it might be called Yellow-Pine Lake, from the following circumstance. About fifteen years ago you could see the top of a pitch-pine, of the kind called yellow-pine hereabouts, though it is not a distinct species, projecting above the surface in deep water, many rods from the shore. It was even supposed by some that the pond had sunk, and this was one of the primitive forest that formerly stood there. I find that even so long ago as 1792, in a “Topographical Description of the Town of Concord,” by one of its citizens, in the Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society, the author, after speaking of Walden and White Ponds, adds: “In the middle of the latter may be seen, when the water is very low, a tree which appears as if it grew in the place where it now stands, although the roots are fifty feet below the surface of the water; the top of this tree is broken off, and at that place measures fourteen inches in diameter.” In the spring of ’49 I talked with the man who lives nearest the pond in Sudbury, who told me that it was he who got out this tree ten or fifteen years before. As near as he could remember, it stood twelve or fifteen rods from the shore, where the water was thirty or forty feet deep. It was in the winter, and he had been getting out ice in the forenoon, and had resolved that in the afternoon, with the aid of his neighbors, he would take out the old yellow-pine. He sawed a channel in the ice toward the shore, and hauled it over and along and out on to the ice with oxen; but, before he had gone far in his work, he was surprised to find that it was wrong end upward, with the stumps of the branches pointing down, and the small end firmly fastened in the sandy bottom. It was about a foot in diameter at the big end, and he had expected to get a good saw-log, but it was so rotten as to be fit only for fuel, if for that. He had some of it in his shed then. There were marks of an axe and of woodpeckers on the butt. He thought that it might have been a dead tree on the shore, but was finally blown over into the pond, and after the top had become waterlogged, while the butt-end was still dry and light, had drifted out and sunk wrong end up. His father, eighty years old, could not remember when it was not there. Several pretty large logs may still be seen lying on the bottom, where, owing to the undulation of the surface, they look like huge water snakes in motion.

Since the woodcutters, the railroad, and I have disturbed Walden, perhaps the most appealing, if not the most beautiful, of all our lakes, the gem of the woods, is White Pond;—a simple name from its commonness, whether it stems from the striking clarity of its waters or the color of its sands. In many ways, it is a lesser twin of Walden. They resemble each other so closely that you’d think they’re connected underground. It has the same rocky shore, and its waters are the same color. Like at Walden, during sultry summer weather, looking down through the trees at some of its shallower areas, where the bottom reflection colors the water, its surface is a misty bluish-green or grayish color. Many years ago, I would go there to collect sand by the cartload to make sandpaper, and I’ve kept visiting ever since. Someone who often goes there suggests calling it Virid Lake. It could also be named Yellow-Pine Lake for a specific reason. About fifteen years ago, you could see the top of a pitch-pine, referred to as yellow-pine around here, poking above the surface in deep water, many yards from the shore. Some even thought the pond had sunk, and this was one of the original trees that used to grow there. As far back as 1792, in a “Topographical Description of the Town of Concord,” written by one of its residents and published in the Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society, the author, after discussing Walden and White Ponds, notes: “In the middle of the latter may be seen, when the water is very low, a tree that appears as if it grew in the place where it now stands, though the roots are fifty feet below the surface of the water; the top of this tree is broken off and measures fourteen inches in diameter at that point.” In the spring of ’49, I spoke with the man who lives closest to the pond in Sudbury, and he told me it was him who pulled this tree out ten or fifteen years earlier. As best as he could remember, it was about twelve or fifteen yards from the shore, in water that was thirty or forty feet deep. It was winter, and he had been cutting ice in the morning, and decided that in the afternoon, with the help of his neighbors, he would pull out the old yellow-pine. He sawed a channel in the ice toward the shore and dragged it out onto the ice with oxen; but before he got far, he was surprised to find it was upside down, with the branch stumps pointing down and the small end firmly stuck in the sandy bottom. It was about a foot in diameter at the larger end, and he had expected to get a decent saw-log, but it was so rotten that it was only good for firewood, if even that. He had some of it in his shed at the time. There were marks from an axe and woodpeckers on the trunk. He thought it might have been a dead tree on the shore, but eventually got blown over into the pond, and after the top became waterlogged while the base stayed dry and light, it drifted out and sank upside down. His father, who is eighty years old, could not recall a time when it wasn’t there. Several large logs can still be seen lying on the bottom, where, because of the rippling surface, they appear to be large water snakes in motion.

This pond has rarely been profaned by a boat, for there is little in it to tempt a fisherman. Instead of the white lily, which requires mud, or the common sweet flag, the blue flag (Iris versicolor) grows thinly in the pure water, rising from the stony bottom all around the shore, where it is visited by humming birds in June; and the color both of its bluish blades and its flowers, and especially their reflections, are in singular harmony with the glaucous water.

This pond has hardly ever been disturbed by a boat, since there's not much in it to attract fishermen. Instead of the white lily, which needs muddy water, or the common sweet flag, the blue flag (Iris versicolor) grows sparsely in the clear water, emerging from the rocky bottom all around the shore, where hummingbirds come in June; the color of its bluish leaves and flowers, especially their reflections, perfectly complements the greenish water.

White Pond and Walden are great crystals on the surface of the earth, Lakes of Light. If they were permanently congealed, and small enough to be clutched, they would, perchance, be carried off by slaves, like precious stones, to adorn the heads of emperors; but being liquid, and ample, and secured to us and our successors forever, we disregard them, and run after the diamond of Kohinoor. They are too pure to have a market value; they contain no muck. How much more beautiful than our lives, how much more transparent than our characters, are they! We never learned meanness of them. How much fairer than the pool before the farmer’s door, in which his ducks swim! Hither the clean wild ducks come. Nature has no human inhabitant who appreciates her. The birds with their plumage and their notes are in harmony with the flowers, but what youth or maiden conspires with the wild luxuriant beauty of Nature? She flourishes most alone, far from the towns where they reside. Talk of heaven! ye disgrace earth.

White Pond and Walden are like brilliant crystals on the earth's surface, Lakes of Light. If they were solidified and small enough to be held, they might be taken by slaves, just like precious stones, to decorate the heads of emperors; but since they are liquid, vast, and forever tied to us and our descendants, we ignore them and chase after the Kohinoor diamond. They’re too pure to have any market value; they have no dirt in them. They are so much more beautiful than our lives and so much more transparent than our characters! We’ve never learned anything petty from them. They’re much fairer than the pond by the farmer's door where his ducks swim! Here, the clean wild ducks come. Nature has no human resident who truly appreciates her. The birds with their colorful feathers and songs are in tune with the flowers, but what young man or woman works in harmony with the untamed beauty of Nature? She thrives best when she’s alone, far from the towns where people live. Talk about heaven! You disgrace the earth.

Baker Farm

Sometimes I rambled to pine groves, standing like temples, or like fleets at sea, full-rigged, with wavy boughs, and rippling with light, so soft and green and shady that the Druids would have forsaken their oaks to worship in them; or to the cedar wood beyond Flint’s Pond, where the trees, covered with hoary blue berries, spiring higher and higher, are fit to stand before Valhalla, and the creeping juniper covers the ground with wreaths full of fruit; or to swamps where the usnea lichen hangs in festoons from the white-spruce trees, and toad-stools, round tables of the swamp gods, cover the ground, and more beautiful fungi adorn the stumps, like butterflies or shells, vegetable winkles; where the swamp-pink and dogwood grow, the red alder-berry glows like eyes of imps, the waxwork grooves and crushes the hardest woods in its folds, and the wild-holly berries make the beholder forget his home with their beauty, and he is dazzled and tempted by nameless other wild forbidden fruits, too fair for mortal taste. Instead of calling on some scholar, I paid many a visit to particular trees, of kinds which are rare in this neighborhood, standing far away in the middle of some pasture, or in the depths of a wood or swamp, or on a hill-top; such as the black-birch, of which we have some handsome specimens two feet in diameter; its cousin, the yellow birch, with its loose golden vest, perfumed like the first; the beech, which has so neat a bole and beautifully lichen-painted, perfect in all its details, of which, excepting scattered specimens, I know but one small grove of sizable trees left in the township, supposed by some to have been planted by the pigeons that were once baited with beech nuts near by; it is worth the while to see the silver grain sparkle when you split this wood; the bass; the hornbeam; the Celtis occidentalis, or false elm, of which we have but one well-grown; some taller mast of a pine, a shingle tree, or a more perfect hemlock than usual, standing like a pagoda in the midst of the woods; and many others I could mention. These were the shrines I visited both summer and winter.

Sometimes I wandered into pine groves that stood like temples or fleets at sea, full-rigged with wavy branches, shimmering with light, so soft, green, and shady that the Druids would have left their oaks to worship there; or to the cedar forest beyond Flint’s Pond, where the trees, adorned with dusty blue berries, reached higher and higher, worthy to stand before Valhalla, while the creeping juniper spread wreaths of fruit across the ground; or to swamps where the usnea lichen hung in festoons from the white-spruce trees, and toadstools, like round tables of the swamp gods, dotted the earth, with beautiful fungi on the stumps resembling butterflies or shells, vegetable wrinkles; where swamp-pink and dogwood grew, the red alder-berry glimmered like the eyes of imps, the waxwork twisted and crushed the hardest woods in its folds, and the wild holly berries made you forget your home with their beauty, dazzling and tempting you with nameless other wild forbidden fruits, too exquisite for mortal taste. Instead of consulting some scholar, I often visited specific trees, types that are rare around here, standing far away in the middle of a pasture, deep in a wood or swamp, or on a hilltop; like the black birch, of which we have some handsome specimens two feet in diameter; its relative, the yellow birch, with its loose golden bark, fragrant like the first; the beech, which has such a neat trunk and a beautiful coat of lichen, perfect in all its details, of which, except for a few scattered specimens, I know of only one small grove of sizable trees left in the township, thought by some to have been planted by the pigeons that once fed on beech nuts nearby; it’s worth seeing the silver grain sparkle when you split this wood; the bass; the hornbeam; the Celtis occidentalis, or false elm, of which we have just one well-grown; some taller pine, a shingle tree, or a more perfect hemlock than usual, standing like a pagoda in the woods; and many others I could mention. These were the shrines I visited both in summer and winter.

Once it chanced that I stood in the very abutment of a rainbow’s arch, which filled the lower stratum of the atmosphere, tinging the grass and leaves around, and dazzling me as if I looked through colored crystal. It was a lake of rainbow light, in which, for a short while, I lived like a dolphin. If it had lasted longer it might have tinged my employments and life. As I walked on the railroad causeway, I used to wonder at the halo of light around my shadow, and would fain fancy myself one of the elect. One who visited me declared that the shadows of some Irishmen before him had no halo about them, that it was only natives that were so distinguished. Benvenuto Cellini tells us in his memoirs, that, after a certain terrible dream or vision which he had during his confinement in the castle of St. Angelo, a resplendent light appeared over the shadow of his head at morning and evening, whether he was in Italy or France, and it was particularly conspicuous when the grass was moist with dew. This was probably the same phenomenon to which I have referred, which is especially observed in the morning, but also at other times, and even by moonlight. Though a constant one, it is not commonly noticed, and, in the case of an excitable imagination like Cellini’s, it would be basis enough for superstition. Beside, he tells us that he showed it to very few. But are they not indeed distinguished who are conscious that they are regarded at all?

Once, I found myself right at the base of a rainbow, which filled the lower part of the atmosphere, coloring the grass and leaves around me and dazzling me as if I were looking through colored glass. It was like being in a lake of rainbow light, where, for a brief moment, I felt as carefree as a dolphin. If it had lasted longer, it might have influenced my work and life in a meaningful way. As I walked along the railroad embankment, I would marvel at the light halo surrounding my shadow, imagining myself as one of the chosen ones. An acquaintance of mine said that the shadows of some Irish men he saw didn’t have halos, and that only the locals were so honored. Benvenuto Cellini writes in his memoirs that, after a particularly terrifying dream or vision while he was imprisoned in the castle of St. Angelo, a brilliant light appeared above his shadow every morning and evening, whether he was in Italy or France, and it was especially noticeable when the grass was wet with dew. This was likely the same phenomenon I mentioned, which is particularly prominent in the morning but can also be seen at other times, including during moonlight. Although it's always present, it often goes unnoticed and, given Cellini's imaginative nature, it could easily lead to superstition. Moreover, he mentioned that he showed it to very few people. But aren’t those who are aware that they are being observed truly special?

I set out one afternoon to go a-fishing to Fair-Haven, through the woods, to eke out my scanty fare of vegetables. My way led through Pleasant Meadow, an adjunct of the Baker Farm, that retreat of which a poet has since sung, beginning,—

I headed out one afternoon to go fishing at Fair-Haven, through the woods, to supplement my limited supply of vegetables. My route took me through Pleasant Meadow, part of the Baker Farm, the place a poet later wrote about, starting,—

“Thy entry is a pleasant field,
Which some mossy fruit trees yield
Partly to a ruddy brook,
By gliding musquash undertook,
And mercurial trout,
Darting about.”

"Your entrance is a lovely area,
Where some mossy fruit trees grow
Next to a cheerful brook,
Where slippery muskrats swim,
And lively trout,
Dart around."

I thought of living there before I went to Walden. I “hooked” the apples, leaped the brook, and scared the musquash and the trout. It was one of those afternoons which seem indefinitely long before one, in which many events may happen, a large portion of our natural life, though it was already half spent when I started. By the way there came up a shower, which compelled me to stand half an hour under a pine, piling boughs over my head, and wearing my handkerchief for a shed; and when at length I had made one cast over the pickerel-weed, standing up to my middle in water, I found myself suddenly in the shadow of a cloud, and the thunder began to rumble with such emphasis that I could do no more than listen to it. The gods must be proud, thought I, with such forked flashes to rout a poor unarmed fisherman. So I made haste for shelter to the nearest hut, which stood half a mile from any road, but so much the nearer to the pond, and had long been uninhabited:—

I thought about living there before I went to Walden. I “hooked” the apples, jumped over the stream, and startled the muskrat and the trout. It was one of those afternoons that feel like they stretch on forever, filled with potential events, a significant part of our natural life, even though it was already half over when I started. Along the way, a rain shower hit, forcing me to stand for half an hour under a pine tree, stacking branches above my head and using my handkerchief for cover; and when I finally cast my line over the pickerel weed, standing waist-deep in the water, I suddenly found myself in the shadow of a cloud, and the thunder started rumbling so strongly that all I could do was listen. The gods must be feeling powerful, I thought, with such lightning strikes to scare an unarmed fisherman. So, I hurried for shelter to the nearest hut, which was half a mile from any road but much closer to the pond, and had been empty for a long time:—

“And here a poet builded,
    In the completed years,
For behold a trivial cabin
    That to destruction steers.”

“And here a poet built,
    In the fulfilling years,
For look at a simple cabin
    That is heading for ruin.”

So the Muse fables. But therein, as I found, dwelt now John Field, an Irishman, and his wife, and several children, from the broad-faced boy who assisted his father at his work, and now came running by his side from the bog to escape the rain, to the wrinkled, sibyl-like, cone-headed infant that sat upon its father’s knee as in the palaces of nobles, and looked out from its home in the midst of wet and hunger inquisitively upon the stranger, with the privilege of infancy, not knowing but it was the last of a noble line, and the hope and cynosure of the world, instead of John Field’s poor starveling brat. There we sat together under that part of the roof which leaked the least, while it showered and thundered without. I had sat there many times of old before the ship was built that floated his family to America. An honest, hard-working, but shiftless man plainly was John Field; and his wife, she too was brave to cook so many successive dinners in the recesses of that lofty stove; with round greasy face and bare breast, still thinking to improve her condition one day; with the never absent mop in one hand, and yet no effects of it visible anywhere. The chickens, which had also taken shelter here from the rain, stalked about the room like members of the family, too humanized methought to roast well. They stood and looked in my eye or pecked at my shoe significantly. Meanwhile my host told me his story, how hard he worked “bogging” for a neighboring farmer, turning up a meadow with a spade or bog hoe at the rate of ten dollars an acre and the use of the land with manure for one year, and his little broad-faced son worked cheerfully at his father’s side the while, not knowing how poor a bargain the latter had made. I tried to help him with my experience, telling him that he was one of my nearest neighbors, and that I too, who came a-fishing here, and looked like a loafer, was getting my living like himself; that I lived in a tight, light, and clean house, which hardly cost more than the annual rent of such a ruin as his commonly amounts to; and how, if he chose, he might in a month or two build himself a palace of his own; that I did not use tea, nor coffee, nor butter, nor milk, nor fresh meat, and so did not have to work to get them; again, as I did not work hard, I did not have to eat hard, and it cost me but a trifle for my food; but as he began with tea, and coffee, and butter, and milk, and beef, he had to work hard to pay for them, and when he had worked hard he had to eat hard again to repair the waste of his system,—and so it was as broad as it was long, indeed it was broader than it was long, for he was discontented and wasted his life into the bargain; and yet he had rated it as a gain in coming to America, that here you could get tea, and coffee, and meat every day. But the only true America is that country where you are at liberty to pursue such a mode of life as may enable you to do without these, and where the state does not endeavor to compel you to sustain the slavery and war and other superfluous expenses which directly or indirectly result from the use of such things. For I purposely talked to him as if he were a philosopher, or desired to be one. I should be glad if all the meadows on the earth were left in a wild state, if that were the consequence of men’s beginning to redeem themselves. A man will not need to study history to find out what is best for his own culture. But alas! the culture of an Irishman is an enterprise to be undertaken with a sort of moral bog hoe. I told him, that as he worked so hard at bogging, he required thick boots and stout clothing, which yet were soon soiled and worn out, but I wore light shoes and thin clothing, which cost not half so much, though he might think that I was dressed like a gentleman, (which, however, was not the case,) and in an hour or two, without labor, but as a recreation, I could, if I wished, catch as many fish as I should want for two days, or earn enough money to support me a week. If he and his family would live simply, they might all go a-huckleberrying in the summer for their amusement. John heaved a sigh at this, and his wife stared with arms a-kimbo, and both appeared to be wondering if they had capital enough to begin such a course with, or arithmetic enough to carry it through. It was sailing by dead reckoning to them, and they saw not clearly how to make their port so; therefore I suppose they still take life bravely, after their fashion, face to face, giving it tooth and nail, not having skill to split its massive columns with any fine entering wedge, and rout it in detail;—thinking to deal with it roughly, as one should handle a thistle. But they fight at an overwhelming disadvantage,—living, John Field, alas! without arithmetic, and failing so.

So the Muse tells stories. But in this one, I found John Field, an Irishman, along with his wife and several children. There was the sturdy boy who helped his dad with work, running by his side from the bog to escape the rain, and the wrinkled, wise-looking baby perched on its father's knee, peering out into the world from their humble home, as if it was from a palace, believing itself to be the last in a noble lineage and the world's hope, rather than just John Field's poor, starving child. We sat together under the part of the roof that leaked the least while it rained heavily outside. I had spent many days there before the ship carried his family to America. John Field was a hard-working but aimless man, and his wife was also brave, preparing meal after meal in that towering stove; with her round, greasy face and bare chest, she was still hoping to improve their situation one day; she held the mop in one hand, yet there was no sign of it being effective anywhere. The chickens that had taken shelter from the rain wandered around the room like family members, too humanized, in my opinion, to be roasting well. They looked me in the eye or pecked at my shoe in a meaningful way. Meanwhile, my host shared his story about how hard he worked "bogging" for a neighboring farmer, turning over meadows with a spade or bog hoe for ten dollars an acre and using the land with manure for a year. His chubby little son worked happily alongside him, unaware of the poor deal his dad had made. I tried to lend him advice from my experience, telling him he was my closest neighbor, and that I, who seemed like a loafer while I fished here, was making my living just like him; that I lived in a tight, bright, clean house that hardly cost more than what he usually paid in rent for his crumbling place; and how, if he wanted, he could build himself a palace in a month or two; that I didn't consume tea, coffee, butter, milk, or fresh meat, so I didn’t have to work to afford them; since I didn't work hard, I didn’t have to eat hard, and my food expenses were minimal; but as he began with tea, coffee, butter, milk, and beef, he had to work hard to pay for them, and after working hard, he had to eat heartily to compensate for his body's needs—and so it all ended up balancing itself out, actually becoming worse for him because he was unhappy and wasting his life; and yet he saw coming to America as a win because here he could get tea, coffee, and meat every day. But the only true America is the land where you can choose a lifestyle that allows you to do without these things, and where the state doesn't try to force you to support the slavery, war, and other unnecessary costs that come from consuming them. I talked to him as if he wanted to be a philosopher. I'd love it if all the meadows were left wild if that meant people started to redeem themselves. A man doesn’t need to study history to learn what’s best for his own growth. But sadly, an Irishman’s culture is an undertaking that requires a sort of moral bog hoe. I told him that since he worked so hard bogging, he needed thick boots and heavy clothes, which quickly got dirty and worn out, while I wore light shoes and thin clothing that didn’t cost half as much; though he might think I was dressed like a gentleman (which I wasn’t), if I wanted to, in an hour or two, without working but just for fun, I could catch enough fish for two days or earn enough money to last me a week. If he and his family lived simply, they could all go berry-picking in the summer for fun. John sighed at this, and his wife stood with her hands on her hips, both seeming to wonder if they had enough resources to start such a lifestyle, or enough math skills to keep it going. It felt like navigating without a compass to them, and they didn’t see a clear path to achieve it; so I suppose they continue to face life bravely in their own way, tackling it head-on, trying to handle it forcefully without the skill to break it down in a refined way; thinking they could wrestle with it, like dealing with a thorny plant. But they were fighting at a severe disadvantage—living, John Field, sadly without math, and failing because of it.

“Do you ever fish?” I asked. “Oh yes, I catch a mess now and then when I am lying by; good perch I catch.” “What’s your bait?” “I catch shiners with fish-worms, and bait the perch with them.” “You’d better go now, John,” said his wife, with glistening and hopeful face; but John demurred.

“Do you ever go fishing?” I asked. “Oh yeah, I catch a bunch every now and then when I'm lying around; I catch good perch.” “What do you use for bait?” “I catch shiners with worms and use them to bait the perch.” “You should probably go now, John,” his wife said, her face shining with hope; but John hesitated.

The shower was now over, and a rainbow above the eastern woods promised a fair evening; so I took my departure. When I had got without I asked for a drink, hoping to get a sight of the well bottom, to complete my survey of the premises; but there, alas! are shallows and quicksands, and rope broken withal, and bucket irrecoverable. Meanwhile the right culinary vessel was selected, water was seemingly distilled, and after consultation and long delay passed out to the thirsty one,—not yet suffered to cool, not yet to settle. Such gruel sustains life here, I thought; so, shutting my eyes, and excluding the motes by a skilfully directed under-current, I drank to genuine hospitality the heartiest draught I could. I am not squeamish in such cases when manners are concerned.

The shower was over, and a rainbow over the eastern woods promised a nice evening, so I decided to leave. Once outside, I asked for a drink, hoping to catch a glimpse of the well’s bottom to finish checking out the place; but, sadly, there were shallow spots and quicksand, a broken rope, and the bucket was lost. In the meantime, they picked the right cooking pot, the water seemed to be distilled, and after some discussion and a long wait, it was finally handed out to the thirsty one—not yet cooled or settled. I thought this gruel kept life going here; so, closing my eyes and blocking out any dust with a well-directed undercurrent, I took the biggest sip I could in the spirit of genuine hospitality. I'm not picky in these situations when it comes to manners.

As I was leaving the Irishman’s roof after the rain, bending my steps again to the pond, my haste to catch pickerel, wading in retired meadows, in sloughs and bog-holes, in forlorn and savage places, appeared for an instant trivial to me who had been sent to school and college; but as I ran down the hill toward the reddening west, with the rainbow over my shoulder, and some faint tinkling sounds borne to my ear through the cleansed air, from I know not what quarter, my Good Genius seemed to say,—Go fish and hunt far and wide day by day,—farther and wider,—and rest thee by many brooks and hearth-sides without misgiving. Remember thy Creator in the days of thy youth. Rise free from care before the dawn, and seek adventures. Let the noon find thee by other lakes, and the night overtake thee everywhere at home. There are no larger fields than these, no worthier games than may here be played. Grow wild according to thy nature, like these sedges and brakes, which will never become English hay. Let the thunder rumble; what if it threaten ruin to farmers’ crops? that is not its errand to thee. Take shelter under the cloud, while they flee to carts and sheds. Let not to get a living be thy trade, but thy sport. Enjoy the land, but own it not. Through want of enterprise and faith men are where they are, buying and selling, and spending their lives like serfs.

As I was leaving the Irishman's roof after the rain, making my way back to the pond, my eagerness to catch pickerel, wading in secluded meadows, in marshes and puddles, in wild and lonely places, seemed momentarily insignificant to me after attending school and college. But as I ran down the hill toward the setting sun, with a rainbow behind me and some distant tinkling sounds carried to my ears through the clear air, from who knows where, my Good Genius seemed to whisper,—Go fish and explore far and wide every day,—further and broader,—and rest beside many streams and hearths without worry. Remember your Creator in your youth. Rise early and seek adventures. Let noon find you by other lakes, and may night catch you wherever you call home. There are no grander fields than these, no better games than can be played here. Embrace your wildness like these grasses and ferns, which will never turn into English hay. Let the thunder roll; what if it threatens farmers’ crops? That’s not its concern for you. Find shelter under the cloud while they rush to carts and sheds. Don’t let earning a living be your only trade but rather your pleasure. Enjoy the land, but don’t possess it. Because of a lack of initiative and belief, people find themselves where they are, buying and selling, spending their lives like serfs.

O Baker Farm!

Oh, Baker Farm!

“Landscape where the richest element
Is a little sunshine innocent.” * *

“No one runs to revel
On thy rail-fenced lea.” * *

“Debate with no man hast thou,
    With questions art never perplexed,
As tame at the first sight as now,
    In thy plain russet gabardine dressed.” * *

“Come ye who love,
    And ye who hate,
Children of the Holy Dove,
    And Guy Faux of the state,
And hang conspiracies
From the tough rafters of the trees!”

“Landscape where the best part
Is a little bit of innocent sunshine.” * *

“No one runs to enjoy
Your fenced-in fields.” * *

“You have no one to debate with,
    You’re never confused by questions,
As calm at first sight as you are now,
    Dressed in your plain brown robe.” * *

“Come all who love,
    And all who hate,
Children of the Holy Dove,
    And those who disrupt the state,
And hang conspiracies
From the sturdy branches of the trees!”

Men come tamely home at night only from the next field or street, where their household echoes haunt, and their life pines because it breathes its own breath over again; their shadows morning and evening reach farther than their daily steps. We should come home from far, from adventures, and perils, and discoveries every day, with new experience and character.

Men come home at night just from the next field or street, where the memories of their home linger, and their lives feel stale as they repeat the same routines; their shadows in the morning and evening stretch further than their daily steps. We should return home from distant adventures, risks, and discoveries every day, bringing back new experiences and growing as people.

Before I had reached the pond some fresh impulse had brought out John Field, with altered mind, letting go “bogging” ere this sunset. But he, poor man, disturbed only a couple of fins while I was catching a fair string, and he said it was his luck; but when we changed seats in the boat luck changed seats too. Poor John Field!—I trust he does not read this, unless he will improve by it,—thinking to live by some derivative old country mode in this primitive new country,—to catch perch with shiners. It is good bait sometimes, I allow. With his horizon all his own, yet he a poor man, born to be poor, with his inherited Irish poverty or poor life, his Adam’s grandmother and boggy ways, not to rise in this world, he nor his posterity, till their wading webbed bog-trotting feet get talaria to their heels.

Before I reached the pond, something new made John Field come out, his mindset changed, letting go of “bogging” before this sunset. But he, poor guy, only disturbed a couple of fish while I was catching a decent string, and he said it was just his luck; but when we switched places in the boat, luck switched places too. Poor John Field!—I hope he doesn’t read this unless he plans to learn from it,—thinking he could survive by some outdated way from the old country in this simple new land,—catching perch with shiners. It’s good bait sometimes, I admit. With his own limited view, yet he’s a poor man, destined to be poor, with his inherited Irish hardship or tough life, his ancestral ties and muddy ways, never rising in this world, neither he nor his descendants, until their wading, webbed, bog-trotting feet get talaria on their heels.

Higher Laws

As I came home through the woods with my string of fish, trailing my pole, it being now quite dark, I caught a glimpse of a woodchuck stealing across my path, and felt a strange thrill of savage delight, and was strongly tempted to seize and devour him raw; not that I was hungry then, except for that wildness which he represented. Once or twice, however, while I lived at the pond, I found myself ranging the woods, like a half-starved hound, with a strange abandonment, seeking some kind of venison which I might devour, and no morsel could have been too savage for me. The wildest scenes had become unaccountably familiar. I found in myself, and still find, an instinct toward a higher, or, as it is named, spiritual life, as do most men, and another toward a primitive rank and savage one, and I reverence them both. I love the wild not less than the good. The wildness and adventure that are in fishing still recommended it to me. I like sometimes to take rank hold on life and spend my day more as the animals do. Perhaps I have owed to this employment and to hunting, when quite young, my closest acquaintance with Nature. They early introduce us to and detain us in scenery with which otherwise, at that age, we should have little acquaintance. Fishermen, hunters, woodchoppers, and others, spending their lives in the fields and woods, in a peculiar sense a part of Nature themselves, are often in a more favorable mood for observing her, in the intervals of their pursuits, than philosophers or poets even, who approach her with expectation. She is not afraid to exhibit herself to them. The traveller on the prairie is naturally a hunter, on the head waters of the Missouri and Columbia a trapper, and at the Falls of St. Mary a fisherman. He who is only a traveller learns things at second-hand and by the halves, and is poor authority. We are most interested when science reports what those men already know practically or instinctively, for that alone is a true humanity, or account of human experience.

As I walked home through the woods with my catch of fish, dragging my pole behind me, the darkness settled in. I caught sight of a woodchuck quickly crossing my path, and a strange thrill of wild excitement shot through me; I was strongly tempted to grab it and eat it raw, not because I was hungry, but because of the wildness it represented. Once or twice while I was living by the pond, I found myself wandering the woods like a half-starved dog, searching aimlessly for some kind of meat to devour, and no piece would have been too brutal for me. The wildest scenes had somehow become surprisingly familiar. I discovered within myself a desire for a higher, or what some call, a spiritual life, as most people do, and another for something more primitive and savage, and I respect both sides. I love the wild just as much as I love the good. The thrill and adventure of fishing still appeals to me. Sometimes, I enjoy grasping life firmly and spending my day more like animals do. Perhaps this activity, along with hunting in my youth, gave me my closest connection to Nature. They introduce us early to, and keep us engaged in, landscapes that we wouldn’t otherwise know at that age. Fishermen, hunters, woodcutters, and others who spend their lives in fields and forests are, in a unique way, part of Nature themselves; they are often better positioned to observe her, during breaks in their work, than philosophers or poets, who approach her with expectations. She doesn’t hesitate to reveal herself to them. The traveler on the prairie naturally becomes a hunter, in the upper waters of the Missouri and Columbia a trapper, and at the Falls of St. Mary a fisherman. Someone who is just a traveler learns things second-hand and incompletely, making them a poor authority. We are most engaged when science conveys what those men already know instinctively or practically, for that is the essence of true humanity, or the real account of human experience.

They mistake who assert that the Yankee has few amusements, because he has not so many public holidays, and men and boys do not play so many games as they do in England, for here the more primitive but solitary amusements of hunting fishing and the like have not yet given place to the former. Almost every New England boy among my contemporaries shouldered a fowling piece between the ages of ten and fourteen; and his hunting and fishing grounds were not limited, like the preserves of an English nobleman, but were more boundless even than those of a savage. No wonder, then, that he did not oftener stay to play on the common. But already a change is taking place, owing, not to an increased humanity, but to an increased scarcity of game, for perhaps the hunter is the greatest friend of the animals hunted, not excepting the Humane Society.

They are mistaken who claim that Yankees have few forms of entertainment simply because they don't have as many public holidays and because men and boys don't engage in games as much as they do in England. Here, more basic but solitary pastimes like hunting and fishing haven’t been replaced by the others yet. Almost every boy in New England around my age picked up a gun between ten and fourteen; his hunting and fishing areas weren’t restricted, like the private lands of an English nobleman, but were even more vast than those of a savage. It’s no surprise, then, that he didn’t spend more time playing in the common. However, a shift is already occurring, not due to greater humanity, but because of a decline in game availability. The hunter may be the greatest ally of the animals being hunted, even more so than the Humane Society.

Moreover, when at the pond, I wished sometimes to add fish to my fare for variety. I have actually fished from the same kind of necessity that the first fishers did. Whatever humanity I might conjure up against it was all factitious, and concerned my philosophy more than my feelings. I speak of fishing only now, for I had long felt differently about fowling, and sold my gun before I went to the woods. Not that I am less humane than others, but I did not perceive that my feelings were much affected. I did not pity the fishes nor the worms. This was habit. As for fowling, during the last years that I carried a gun my excuse was that I was studying ornithology, and sought only new or rare birds. But I confess that I am now inclined to think that there is a finer way of studying ornithology than this. It requires so much closer attention to the habits of the birds, that, if for that reason only, I have been willing to omit the gun. Yet notwithstanding the objection on the score of humanity, I am compelled to doubt if equally valuable sports are ever substituted for these; and when some of my friends have asked me anxiously about their boys, whether they should let them hunt, I have answered, yes,—remembering that it was one of the best parts of my education,—make them hunters, though sportsmen only at first, if possible, mighty hunters at last, so that they shall not find game large enough for them in this or any vegetable wilderness,—hunters as well as fishers of men. Thus far I am of the opinion of Chaucer’s nun, who

Additionally, when I was at the pond, I sometimes wanted to catch fish to add some variety to my meals. I’ve actually fished out of the same necessity that the first fishermen did. Any feelings I might have against it were superficial and related more to my philosophy than to my emotions. I mention fishing now because I had long felt differently about bird hunting and sold my gun before heading into the woods. It’s not that I’m less compassionate than others, but I didn’t feel that my emotions were significantly affected. I didn’t feel sorry for the fish or the worms. That was just habit. As for bird hunting, during the last years I had a gun, I justified it by saying I was studying birds and looking for new or rare species. But I admit I’m now starting to believe there’s a better way to study birds than that. It takes much more attention to observe their habits, which is why I’ve been willing to give up the gun. However, despite the humanitarian concerns, I can’t help but wonder if equally rewarding activities ever replace these ones. When some friends have asked me anxiously whether they should let their boys hunt, I’ve said yes—remembering that it was one of the best parts of my education—make them hunters, at least at first just as sportsmen, but hopefully mighty hunters in the end, so they’ll find no game too big for them in this or any wilderness. Hunters, as well as fishers of men. Up to this point, I share the opinion of Chaucer’s nun, who

“yave not of the text a pulled hen
That saith that hunters ben not holy men.”

“you don't have a passage from the text
That says hunters aren't holy men.”

There is a period in the history of the individual, as of the race, when the hunters are the “best men,” as the Algonquins called them. We cannot but pity the boy who has never fired a gun; he is no more humane, while his education has been sadly neglected. This was my answer with respect to those youths who were bent on this pursuit, trusting that they would soon outgrow it. No humane being, past the thoughtless age of boyhood, will wantonly murder any creature which holds its life by the same tenure that he does. The hare in its extremity cries like a child. I warn you, mothers, that my sympathies do not always make the usual phil-anthropic distinctions.

There comes a time in both personal and cultural history when hunters are seen as the "best men," as the Algonquins put it. We can't help but feel sorry for a boy who has never fired a gun; he isn't necessarily more compassionate, but his upbringing has definitely been lacking. This was my response to those young people eager for this pursuit, hoping they would eventually grow out of it. No compassionate person, once they're past the carefree days of childhood, would kill any creature thoughtlessly, knowing that it clings to life just as he does. The hare, in its desperation, cries out like a child. I caution you, mothers, that my sympathies may not always align with the usual philanthropic distinctions.

Such is oftenest the young man’s introduction to the forest, and the most original part of himself. He goes thither at first as a hunter and fisher, until at last, if he has the seeds of a better life in him, he distinguishes his proper objects, as a poet or naturalist it may be, and leaves the gun and fish-pole behind. The mass of men are still and always young in this respect. In some countries a hunting parson is no uncommon sight. Such a one might make a good shepherd’s dog, but is far from being the Good Shepherd. I have been surprised to consider that the only obvious employment, except wood-chopping, ice-cutting, or the like business, which ever to my knowledge detained at Walden Pond for a whole half day any of my fellow-citizens, whether fathers or children of the town, with just one exception, was fishing. Commonly they did not think that they were lucky, or well paid for their time, unless they got a long string of fish, though they had the opportunity of seeing the pond all the while. They might go there a thousand times before the sediment of fishing would sink to the bottom and leave their purpose pure; but no doubt such a clarifying process would be going on all the while. The governor and his council faintly remember the pond, for they went a-fishing there when they were boys; but now they are too old and dignified to go a-fishing, and so they know it no more forever. Yet even they expect to go to heaven at last. If the legislature regards it, it is chiefly to regulate the number of hooks to be used there; but they know nothing about the hook of hooks with which to angle for the pond itself, impaling the legislature for a bait. Thus, even in civilized communities, the embryo man passes through the hunter stage of development.

This is often the young man's first experience with the forest and the most authentic part of himself. He goes there initially as a hunter and fisherman until, if he has the potential for a better life within him, he identifies his true passions, whether as a poet or naturalist, and leaves the gun and fishing pole behind. Most people remain young in this regard. In some places, a hunting pastor is not an unusual sight. Such a person might make a decent shepherd's dog but is far from being the Good Shepherd. I've been surprised to realize that the only noticeable activity, besides wood-chopping or ice-cutting, that ever kept any of my fellow citizens, whether parents or children, at Walden Pond for an entire half-day—except for one case—was fishing. Typically, they did not feel they were fortunate or compensated for their time unless they caught a lot of fish, even though they had the chance to enjoy the beauty of the pond the whole time. They could visit a thousand times before the mindset of fishing would fade away, leaving their purpose clear; but undoubtedly, such a clarifying process would be happening all along. The governor and his council vaguely recall the pond because they fished there as boys, but now they've grown too old and dignified for fishing, and so they have forgotten it forever. Yet even they expect to end up in heaven eventually. If the legislature considers it, it’s mainly to regulate the number of fishing hooks that can be used there; however, they know nothing about the ultimate hook meant to fish for the pond itself, which serves to catch the legislature as bait. Thus, even in civilized societies, the developing man goes through the hunter phase of growth.

I have found repeatedly, of late years, that I cannot fish without falling a little in self-respect. I have tried it again and again. I have skill at it, and, like many of my fellows, a certain instinct for it, which revives from time to time, but always when I have done I feel that it would have been better if I had not fished. I think that I do not mistake. It is a faint intimation, yet so are the first streaks of morning. There is unquestionably this instinct in me which belongs to the lower orders of creation; yet with every year I am less a fisherman, though without more humanity or even wisdom; at present I am no fisherman at all. But I see that if I were to live in a wilderness I should again be tempted to become a fisher and hunter in earnest. Beside, there is something essentially unclean about this diet and all flesh, and I began to see where housework commences, and whence the endeavor, which costs so much, to wear a tidy and respectable appearance each day, to keep the house sweet and free from all ill odors and sights. Having been my own butcher and scullion and cook, as well as the gentleman for whom the dishes were served up, I can speak from an unusually complete experience. The practical objection to animal food in my case was its uncleanness; and, besides, when I had caught and cleaned and cooked and eaten my fish, they seemed not to have fed me essentially. It was insignificant and unnecessary, and cost more than it came to. A little bread or a few potatoes would have done as well, with less trouble and filth. Like many of my contemporaries, I had rarely for many years used animal food, or tea, or coffee, &c.; not so much because of any ill effects which I had traced to them, as because they were not agreeable to my imagination. The repugnance to animal food is not the effect of experience, but is an instinct. It appeared more beautiful to live low and fare hard in many respects; and though I never did so, I went far enough to please my imagination. I believe that every man who has ever been earnest to preserve his higher or poetic faculties in the best condition has been particularly inclined to abstain from animal food, and from much food of any kind. It is a significant fact, stated by entomologists, I find it in Kirby and Spence, that “some insects in their perfect state, though furnished with organs of feeding, make no use of them;” and they lay it down as “a general rule, that almost all insects in this state eat much less than in that of larvæ. The voracious caterpillar when transformed into a butterfly,” . . “and the gluttonous maggot when become a fly,” content themselves with a drop or two of honey or some other sweet liquid. The abdomen under the wings of the butterfly still represents the larva. This is the tid-bit which tempts his insectivorous fate. The gross feeder is a man in the larva state; and there are whole nations in that condition, nations without fancy or imagination, whose vast abdomens betray them.

I’ve found over the past few years that I can’t fish without losing a bit of self-respect. I’ve tried it repeatedly. I have the skill for it, and like many others, a certain instinct for it that pops up now and then, but every time I’m done, I feel it would have been better if I hadn’t fished at all. I think I’m not mistaken. It’s a faint feeling, but then again, so are the first hints of dawn. There’s definitely this instinct in me that belongs to the lower orders of nature; yet as each year passes, I feel less like a fisherman, though I haven’t gained any more humanity or wisdom; right now, I’m not a fisherman at all. However, I see if I were to live in a wilderness, I’d be tempted to become a serious fisher and hunter again. Besides, there’s something inherently unclean about this diet and all flesh, and I’ve started to understand where housework begins and why it takes so much effort to appear tidy and respectable every day, to keep the house fresh and free from bad smells and sights. Having been my own butcher, dishwasher, and cook, as well as the gentleman for whom the meals were served, I can speak from a fairly complete experience. The main issue with animal food for me is its uncleanness; plus, after catching, cleaning, cooking, and eating my fish, they didn’t seem to nourish me in a meaningful way. It felt trivial and unnecessary, costing more than it was worth. A little bread or some potatoes would have sufficed, with less hassle and mess. Like many of my peers, I hadn’t eaten animal food, tea, or coffee for years; not so much due to any negative effects I noticed, but because they didn’t appeal to my imagination. The aversion to animal food isn’t due to experience, but rather instinct. Living simply and enduring hardships in many ways seemed more beautiful; and although I never fully lived that way, I went far enough to satisfy my imagination. I believe that every man who has seriously tried to keep his higher, more artistic faculties in peak condition has been especially inclined to avoid animal food and to eat less food overall. It’s a significant fact noted by entomologists, as mentioned in Kirby and Spence, that “some insects in their perfect state, though equipped with feeding organs, don’t use them;” and they assert as “a general rule that almost all insects in this state eat much less than in their larval form. The greedy caterpillar, when transformed into a butterfly,”... “and the gluttonous maggot when it becomes a fly,” are satisfied with just a drop or two of honey or another sweet liquid. The abdomen under the wings of the butterfly still reflects the larva. This is the tempting morsel that leads to its insect-eating fate. The glutton is a man in the larval stage; and there are entire nations stuck in that state, nations without imagination or creativity, whose large abdomens give them away.

It is hard to provide and cook so simple and clean a diet as will not offend the imagination; but this, I think, is to be fed when we feed the body; they should both sit down at the same table. Yet perhaps this may be done. The fruits eaten temperately need not make us ashamed of our appetites, nor interrupt the worthiest pursuits. But put an extra condiment into your dish, and it will poison you. It is not worth the while to live by rich cookery. Most men would feel shame if caught preparing with their own hands precisely such a dinner, whether of animal or vegetable food, as is every day prepared for them by others. Yet till this is otherwise we are not civilized, and, if gentlemen and ladies, are not true men and women. This certainly suggests what change is to be made. It may be vain to ask why the imagination will not be reconciled to flesh and fat. I am satisfied that it is not. Is it not a reproach that man is a carnivorous animal? True, he can and does live, in a great measure, by preying on other animals; but this is a miserable way,—as any one who will go to snaring rabbits, or slaughtering lambs, may learn,—and he will be regarded as a benefactor of his race who shall teach man to confine himself to a more innocent and wholesome diet. Whatever my own practice may be, I have no doubt that it is a part of the destiny of the human race, in its gradual improvement, to leave off eating animals, as surely as the savage tribes have left off eating each other when they came in contact with the more civilized.

It’s tough to provide and prepare a diet that’s simple and clean without offending the imagination; however, I believe both our bodies and minds should be nourished together at the same table. But maybe this is possible. Eating fruits in moderation shouldn't make us ashamed of our appetites or distract us from worthwhile pursuits. But add an extra seasoning to your meal, and it can harm you. It's not worthwhile to live off extravagant cooking. Most people would feel embarrassed if they were caught cooking a meal with their own hands that is similar to what others prepare for them daily, whether it’s animal or plant-based. Until this changes, we can't claim to be civilized, and if we are gentlemen and ladies, we aren't true men and women. This certainly indicates what needs to change. It may seem pointless to ask why our imagination won’t accept flesh and fat. I’m convinced it won’t. Isn’t it a shame that humans are carnivorous creatures? Sure, we can and do live largely by hunting other animals, but that’s a miserable way to live—as anyone who goes rabbit hunting or lamb slaughtering can see—and whoever teaches humanity to stick to a more innocent and healthy diet will be seen as a benefactor. Regardless of what my own habits are, I firmly believe it’s part of humanity's evolutionary journey to stop eating animals, just as primitive tribes have stopped eating each other once they encountered more civilized societies.

If one listens to the faintest but constant suggestions of his genius, which are certainly true, he sees not to what extremes, or even insanity, it may lead him; and yet that way, as he grows more resolute and faithful, his road lies. The faintest assured objection which one healthy man feels will at length prevail over the arguments and customs of mankind. No man ever followed his genius till it misled him. Though the result were bodily weakness, yet perhaps no one can say that the consequences were to be regretted, for these were a life in conformity to higher principles. If the day and the night are such that you greet them with joy, and life emits a fragrance like flowers and sweet-scented herbs, is more elastic, more starry, more immortal,—that is your success. All nature is your congratulation, and you have cause momentarily to bless yourself. The greatest gains and values are farthest from being appreciated. We easily come to doubt if they exist. We soon forget them. They are the highest reality. Perhaps the facts most astounding and most real are never communicated by man to man. The true harvest of my daily life is somewhat as intangible and indescribable as the tints of morning or evening. It is a little star-dust caught, a segment of the rainbow which I have clutched.

If you listen to the faint but constant whispers of your inner genius, which are definitely true, you may not realize how far they can lead you, even to the brink of madness; yet as you become more determined and loyal, that's the direction your path will take. The slightest clear objection that a healthy person feels will eventually outweigh the arguments and traditions of society. No one has ever followed their genius to the point of it leading them astray. Although the outcome might be physical weakness, perhaps no one can truly say those consequences are regrettable, because they represent a life aligned with higher principles. If your days and nights are such that you welcome them with joy, and life feels as sweet as flowers and aromatic herbs, more vibrant, more celestial, more eternal—that is your success. All of nature is celebrating you, and you have every reason to feel grateful in the moment. The greatest rewards and values are often the least appreciated. We easily start to doubt their existence and quickly forget them. They represent the highest reality. Perhaps the most astonishing and real facts are never shared between people. The true essence of my daily life is somewhat as intangible and hard to describe as the colors of dawn or dusk. It's like a bit of stardust I've captured, a piece of the rainbow I've managed to hold onto.

Yet, for my part, I was never unusually squeamish; I could sometimes eat a fried rat with a good relish, if it were necessary. I am glad to have drunk water so long, for the same reason that I prefer the natural sky to an opium-eater’s heaven. I would fain keep sober always; and there are infinite degrees of drunkenness. I believe that water is the only drink for a wise man; wine is not so noble a liquor; and think of dashing the hopes of a morning with a cup of warm coffee, or of an evening with a dish of tea! Ah, how low I fall when I am tempted by them! Even music may be intoxicating. Such apparently slight causes destroyed Greece and Rome, and will destroy England and America. Of all ebriosity, who does not prefer to be intoxicated by the air he breathes? I have found it to be the most serious objection to coarse labors long continued, that they compelled me to eat and drink coarsely also. But to tell the truth, I find myself at present somewhat less particular in these respects. I carry less religion to the table, ask no blessing; not because I am wiser than I was, but, I am obliged to confess, because, however much it is to be regretted, with years I have grown more coarse and indifferent. Perhaps these questions are entertained only in youth, as most believe of poetry. My practice is “nowhere,” my opinion is here. Nevertheless I am far from regarding myself as one of those privileged ones to whom the Ved refers when it says, that “he who has true faith in the Omnipresent Supreme Being may eat all that exists,” that is, is not bound to inquire what is his food, or who prepares it; and even in their case it is to be observed, as a Hindoo commentator has remarked, that the Vedant limits this privilege to “the time of distress.”

Yet, I’ve never been particularly squeamish; I could sometimes eat a fried rat with no problem if I had to. I'm glad I've stuck with water for so long, just like I prefer the natural sky over an opium addict’s dreamland. I want to stay sober all the time; there are many levels of drunkenness. I believe water is the only drink for a wise person; wine isn’t as noble a beverage, and think of ruining the hopes of a morning with a cup of hot coffee or an evening with tea! Ah, how low I sink when I give in to those! Even music can be intoxicating. Such seemingly minor things brought down Greece and Rome and will bring down England and America. Out of all types of intoxication, who doesn’t prefer to be lifted up by the air we breathe? I've found that the biggest downside to doing hard work for a long time is that it forces me to eat and drink poorly too. But to be honest, I’m a bit less picky about these things now. I don't bring as much reverence to the table anymore, I don’t say a blessing; not because I’m wiser than before, but, I have to admit, that as I’ve gotten older, I’ve become coarser and more indifferent, which is unfortunate. Maybe these thoughts only come up in youth, like most people think about poetry. My practice is “nowhere,” my opinion is right here. Still, I don't consider myself one of those special individuals referenced in the Ved, which says that “he who has true faith in the Omnipresent Supreme Being may eat all that exists,” meaning they're not required to question what their food is or who prepares it; and even in their case, as a Hindu commentator pointed out, the Vedant limits this privilege to “the time of distress.”

Who has not sometimes derived an inexpressible satisfaction from his food in which appetite had no share? I have been thrilled to think that I owed a mental perception to the commonly gross sense of taste, that I have been inspired through the palate, that some berries which I had eaten on a hill-side had fed my genius. “The soul not being mistress of herself,” says Thseng-tseu, “one looks, and one does not see; one listens, and one does not hear; one eats, and one does not know the savor of food.” He who distinguishes the true savor of his food can never be a glutton; he who does not cannot be otherwise. A puritan may go to his brown-bread crust with as gross an appetite as ever an alderman to his turtle. Not that food which entereth into the mouth defileth a man, but the appetite with which it is eaten. It is neither the quality nor the quantity, but the devotion to sensual savors; when that which is eaten is not a viand to sustain our animal, or inspire our spiritual life, but food for the worms that possess us. If the hunter has a taste for mud-turtles, muskrats, and other such savage tid-bits, the fine lady indulges a taste for jelly made of a calf’s foot, or for sardines from over the sea, and they are even. He goes to the mill-pond, she to her preserve-pot. The wonder is how they, how you and I, can live this slimy, beastly life, eating and drinking.

Who hasn’t sometimes felt an indescribable satisfaction from food where appetite played no part? I’ve been excited to realize that a mental insight came from the often crude sense of taste, that I was inspired through my palate, that some berries I picked on a hillside nourished my creativity. “The soul not being master of itself,” says Thseng-tseu, “one looks, yet does not see; one listens, yet does not hear; one eats, yet does not know the taste of food.” Someone who recognizes the true flavor of their food can never be a glutton; those who don’t, cannot help but be. A puritan can approach his whole-grain crust with as coarse an appetite as any alderman does with his turtle soup. It’s not the food that enters the mouth that defiles a person, but the appetite with which it’s consumed. It’s not about the quality or quantity, but the obsession with sensual tastes; when what we eat isn’t fuel for our bodies or nourishment for our spirit, but just sustenance for the worms that consume us. If the hunter has a taste for mud turtles, muskrats, and other such wild treats, the sophisticated lady indulges in jelly made from a calf's foot or sardines from far away, and they are equal. He goes to the mill pond, she goes to her canning jar. The real wonder is how they, how you and I, can live this slimy, beastly existence, eating and drinking.

Our whole life is startlingly moral. There is never an instant’s truce between virtue and vice. Goodness is the only investment that never fails. In the music of the harp which trembles round the world it is the insisting on this which thrills us. The harp is the travelling patterer for the Universe’s Insurance Company, recommending its laws, and our little goodness is all the assessment that we pay. Though the youth at last grows indifferent, the laws of the universe are not indifferent, but are forever on the side of the most sensitive. Listen to every zephyr for some reproof, for it is surely there, and he is unfortunate who does not hear it. We cannot touch a string or move a stop but the charming moral transfixes us. Many an irksome noise, go a long way off, is heard as music, a proud sweet satire on the meanness of our lives.

Our entire lives are profoundly moral. There's never a moment’s pause between good and evil. Kindness is the only investment that always pays off. In the music of the harp that resonates throughout the world, it's this insistence that moves us. The harp acts as the traveling messenger for the Universe’s Insurance Company, promoting its principles, and our little acts of kindness are the only premiums we pay. Although young people may eventually become indifferent, the universe's laws remain attentive and always favor the most sensitive individuals. Pay attention to every gentle breeze for some guidance, as it's surely there, and those who don’t notice are unfortunate. We can't play a string or adjust a note without being captivated by its moral charm. Many annoying sounds, far away, are heard as music, a proud and sweet satire on the pettiness of our lives.

We are conscious of an animal in us, which awakens in proportion as our higher nature slumbers. It is reptile and sensual, and perhaps cannot be wholly expelled; like the worms which, even in life and health, occupy our bodies. Possibly we may withdraw from it, but never change its nature. I fear that it may enjoy a certain health of its own; that we may be well, yet not pure. The other day I picked up the lower jaw of a hog, with white and sound teeth and tusks, which suggested that there was an animal health and vigor distinct from the spiritual. This creature succeeded by other means than temperance and purity. “That in which men differ from brute beasts,” says Mencius, “is a thing very inconsiderable; the common herd lose it very soon; superior men preserve it carefully.” Who knows what sort of life would result if we had attained to purity? If I knew so wise a man as could teach me purity I would go to seek him forthwith. “A command over our passions, and over the external senses of the body, and good acts, are declared by the Ved to be indispensable in the mind’s approximation to God.” Yet the spirit can for the time pervade and control every member and function of the body, and transmute what in form is the grossest sensuality into purity and devotion. The generative energy, which, when we are loose, dissipates and makes us unclean, when we are continent invigorates and inspires us. Chastity is the flowering of man; and what are called Genius, Heroism, Holiness, and the like, are but various fruits which succeed it. Man flows at once to God when the channel of purity is open. By turns our purity inspires and our impurity casts us down. He is blessed who is assured that the animal is dying out in him day by day, and the divine being established. Perhaps there is none but has cause for shame on account of the inferior and brutish nature to which he is allied. I fear that we are such gods or demigods only as fauns and satyrs, the divine allied to beasts, the creatures of appetite, and that, to some extent, our very life is our disgrace.—

We are aware of an animal inside us that comes alive as our higher nature falls asleep. It's primal and sensual, and maybe it can’t be entirely eliminated; like the worms that inhabit our bodies even when we are healthy. We might distance ourselves from it, but we can’t change what it is. I worry that it might have a kind of health of its own; that we can be fine yet not pure. Recently, I found a lower jaw of a pig, with healthy white teeth and tusks, suggesting that there’s a type of animal health and vitality that’s separate from the spiritual. This creature thrives through means other than self-control and purity. “What makes humans different from animals,” says Mencius, “is something very small; the average person loses it quickly; exceptional people hold onto it tightly.” Who knows what kind of life we would have if we achieved purity? If I knew a wise person who could teach me about purity, I would seek them out immediately. “Control over our emotions, our physical senses, and good actions are essential for the mind’s connection to God,” say the Vedas. Yet the spirit can completely fill and regulate every part of the body, transforming what is fundamentally crude sensuality into purity and devotion. The creative energy, which when we are reckless dissipates and makes us dirty, when we practice self-control strengthens and motivates us. Chastity is the blossoming of man; and what we call Genius, Heroism, Holiness, and so on are just different fruits that follow. A person flows toward God when the path of purity is open. Sometimes our purity uplifts us and our impurity pulls us down. Blessed is he who knows that the animal in him is slowly fading away each day, and the divine self is taking its place. Perhaps everyone has some reason to feel ashamed of the lower, beastly nature they are connected to. I fear that we are such gods or demigods only like fauns and satyrs, the divine mixed with beasts, creatures of desire, and that, to some extent, our very existence is our shame.

“How happy’s he who hath due place assigned
To his beasts and disafforested his mind!
                *    *    *    *    *
Can use this horse, goat, wolf, and ev’ry beast,
And is not ass himself to all the rest!
Else man not only is the herd of swine,
But he’s those devils too which did incline
Them to a headlong rage, and made them worse.”

“How happy is he who gives his animals their rightful space
And has cleared his mind!
* * * * *
Can handle this horse, goat, wolf, and every creature,
And isn’t foolish like the rest of them!
Otherwise, man isn’t just a herd of pigs,
But he’s also the demons that pushed them
Into a wild rage and made them even worse.”

All sensuality is one, though it takes many forms; all purity is one. It is the same whether a man eat, or drink, or cohabit, or sleep sensually. They are but one appetite, and we only need to see a person do any one of these things to know how great a sensualist he is. The impure can neither stand nor sit with purity. When the reptile is attacked at one mouth of his burrow, he shows himself at another. If you would be chaste, you must be temperate. What is chastity? How shall a man know if he is chaste? He shall not know it. We have heard of this virtue, but we know not what it is. We speak conformably to the rumor which we have heard. From exertion come wisdom and purity; from sloth ignorance and sensuality. In the student sensuality is a sluggish habit of mind. An unclean person is universally a slothful one, one who sits by a stove, whom the sun shines on prostrate, who reposes without being fatigued. If you would avoid uncleanness, and all the sins, work earnestly, though it be at cleaning a stable. Nature is hard to be overcome, but she must be overcome. What avails it that you are Christian, if you are not purer than the heathen, if you deny yourself no more, if you are not more religious? I know of many systems of religion esteemed heathenish whose precepts fill the reader with shame, and provoke him to new endeavors, though it be to the performance of rites merely.

All sensuality is the same, even though it shows up in different ways; all purity is the same too. It doesn’t matter whether a person eats, drinks, has sex, or sleeps in a sensual way. They all come from one desire, and you can tell how much of a sensualist someone is just by watching them do any of these things. The impure can't stand or sit side by side with purity. When a reptile is attacked at one entrance of its burrow, it reveals itself at another. If you want to be chaste, you have to be moderate. What is chastity? How can someone know if they are chaste? They won’t know. We’ve heard of this virtue, but we don’t truly understand it. We talk according to the rumors we've heard. Wisdom and purity come from effort; ignorance and sensuality come from laziness. For a student, sensuality is a sluggish mindset. A person who is unclean is usually lazy, someone who lounges by a stove, lying in the sun without moving, resting without actually being tired. If you want to avoid uncleanness and all the sins, work hard, even if it's just cleaning a stable. Nature is tough to conquer, but it must be conquered. What good is it that you call yourself a Christian if you’re not purer than a nonbeliever, if you don't deny yourself anything, if you're not more spiritual? I know of many religions considered pagan whose teachings fill the reader with shame and inspire them to new efforts, even if it's just for the sake of performing rituals.

I hesitate to say these things, but it is not because of the subject,—I care not how obscene my words are,—but because I cannot speak of them without betraying my impurity. We discourse freely without shame of one form of sensuality, and are silent about another. We are so degraded that we cannot speak simply of the necessary functions of human nature. In earlier ages, in some countries, every function was reverently spoken of and regulated by law. Nothing was too trivial for the Hindoo lawgiver, however offensive it may be to modern taste. He teaches how to eat, drink, cohabit, void excrement and urine, and the like, elevating what is mean, and does not falsely excuse himself by calling these things trifles.

I hesitate to say these things, but it’s not because of the subject—I don’t care how obscene my words are—but because I can’t talk about them without revealing my own impurity. We discuss one type of sensuality openly and without shame, yet remain silent about another. We’ve become so degraded that we can’t even talk plainly about the basic functions of human nature. In earlier times, in some cultures, every function was discussed respectfully and regulated by law. Nothing was too trivial for the Hindu lawgiver, no matter how offensive it might seem today. He instructs on how to eat, drink, have sex, relieve oneself, and so on, elevating what is considered lowly, and doesn’t falsely dismiss these matters as trifles.

Every man is the builder of a temple, called his body, to the god he worships, after a style purely his own, nor can he get off by hammering marble instead. We are all sculptors and painters, and our material is our own flesh and blood and bones. Any nobleness begins at once to refine a man’s features, any meanness or sensuality to imbrute them.

Every person is the architect of a temple, known as their body, for the deity they revere, crafted in a style uniquely their own; they can't just settle for shaping marble instead. We are all sculptors and artists, and our medium is our own flesh, blood, and bones. Any sense of nobility immediately begins to enhance a person's features, while any pettiness or indulgence tends to degrade them.

John Farmer sat at his door one September evening, after a hard day’s work, his mind still running on his labor more or less. Having bathed, he sat down to re-create his intellectual man. It was a rather cool evening, and some of his neighbors were apprehending a frost. He had not attended to the train of his thoughts long when he heard some one playing on a flute, and that sound harmonized with his mood. Still he thought of his work; but the burden of his thought was, that though this kept running in his head, and he found himself planning and contriving it against his will, yet it concerned him very little. It was no more than the scurf of his skin, which was constantly shuffled off. But the notes of the flute came home to his ears out of a different sphere from that he worked in, and suggested work for certain faculties which slumbered in him. They gently did away with the street, and the village, and the state in which he lived. A voice said to him,—Why do you stay here and live this mean moiling life, when a glorious existence is possible for you? Those same stars twinkle over other fields than these.—But how to come out of this condition and actually migrate thither? All that he could think of was to practise some new austerity, to let his mind descend into his body and redeem it, and treat himself with ever increasing respect.

John Farmer sat at his door one September evening after a long day of work, his mind still focused on his tasks. After bathing, he sat down to refresh his intellect. It was a cool evening, and some neighbors were worried about a frost. He hadn’t been pondering his thoughts for long when he heard someone playing a flute, and that sound matched his mood. He still thought about his work, but the weight of it felt less significant; it was like dead skin constantly shedding. The notes of the flute resonated from a different realm than the one he operated in and awakened dormant talents within him. They slowly erased the street, the village, and the circumstances in which he lived. A voice asked him, “Why are you here living this dull, exhausting life when a wonderful existence is possible for you? Those same stars shine over other fields.” But how could he escape this situation and truly move toward that life? All he could think to do was to adopt some new discipline, let his mind connect with his body to elevate it, and treat himself with growing respect.

Brute Neighbors

Sometimes I had a companion in my fishing, who came through the village to my house from the other side of the town, and the catching of the dinner was as much a social exercise as the eating of it.

Sometimes I had a friend come to my house from the other side of town to join me in fishing, and catching dinner was just as much a social activity as eating it.

Hermit. I wonder what the world is doing now. I have not heard so much as a locust over the sweet-fern these three hours. The pigeons are all asleep upon their roosts,—no flutter from them. Was that a farmer’s noon horn which sounded from beyond the woods just now? The hands are coming in to boiled salt beef and cider and Indian bread. Why will men worry themselves so? He that does not eat need not work. I wonder how much they have reaped. Who would live there where a body can never think for the barking of Bose? And O, the housekeeping! to keep bright the devil’s door-knobs, and scour his tubs this bright day! Better not keep a house. Say, some hollow tree; and then for morning calls and dinner-parties! Only a woodpecker tapping. O, they swarm; the sun is too warm there; they are born too far into life for me. I have water from the spring, and a loaf of brown bread on the shelf.—Hark! I hear a rustling of the leaves. Is it some ill-fed village hound yielding to the instinct of the chase? or the lost pig which is said to be in these woods, whose tracks I saw after the rain? It comes on apace; my sumachs and sweet-briers tremble.—Eh, Mr. Poet, is it you? How do you like the world to-day?

Hermit. I wonder what the world is up to right now. I haven't heard anything except for a locust over the sweet-fern for the past three hours. The pigeons are all asleep in their roosts—no flapping from them. Was that a farmer’s noon horn I just heard from beyond the woods? The workers are coming in for boiled salt beef, cider, and Indian bread. Why do people stress themselves so much? If you don’t eat, you don’t need to work. I wonder how much they’ve harvested. Who would want to live where you can never think because of the barking of Bose? And oh, the housekeeping! Keeping the devil’s door knobs shiny and scrubbing his tubs on this beautiful day! It’s better not to have a house. Just find some hollow tree; then you can skip morning calls and dinner parties! Only a woodpecker tapping. Oh, they’re everywhere; the sun is too warm there; they're too caught up in life for me. I have water from the spring and a loaf of brown bread on the shelf.—Wait! I hear some rustling in the leaves. Is it a poorly-fed village dog giving in to the instinct to chase? Or the lost pig that’s said to be in these woods, whose tracks I saw after the rain? It’s getting closer; my sumacs and sweet-briers are shaking.—Hey, Mr. Poet, is that you? How do you like the world today?

Poet. See those clouds; how they hang! That’s the greatest thing I have seen to-day. There’s nothing like it in old paintings, nothing like it in foreign lands,—unless when we were off the coast of Spain. That’s a true Mediterranean sky. I thought, as I have my living to get, and have not eaten to-day, that I might go a-fishing. That’s the true industry for poets. It is the only trade I have learned. Come, let’s along.

Poet. Look at those clouds; they're amazing! That's the best thing I've seen today. There's nothing like it in old paintings or in other countries—except maybe when we were off the coast of Spain. That’s a real Mediterranean sky. I was thinking that since I need to make a living and haven't eaten today, I might go fishing. That's the true work for poets. It’s the only job I've learned. Come on, let's go.

Hermit. I cannot resist. My brown bread will soon be gone. I will go with you gladly soon, but I am just concluding a serious meditation. I think that I am near the end of it. Leave me alone, then, for a while. But that we may not be delayed, you shall be digging the bait meanwhile. Angle-worms are rarely to be met with in these parts, where the soil was never fattened with manure; the race is nearly extinct. The sport of digging the bait is nearly equal to that of catching the fish, when one’s appetite is not too keen; and this you may have all to yourself to-day. I would advise you to set in the spade down yonder among the ground-nuts, where you see the johnswort waving. I think that I may warrant you one worm to every three sods you turn up, if you look well in among the roots of the grass, as if you were weeding. Or, if you choose to go farther, it will not be unwise, for I have found the increase of fair bait to be very nearly as the squares of the distances.

Hermit. I can't resist. My brown bread will be gone soon. I’ll happily join you shortly, but I’m just finishing up some serious thinking. I think I’m almost done with it. Please leave me alone for a bit. But to avoid delays, you can start digging for bait in the meantime. Angle-worms are hard to find around here since the soil has never been enriched with manure; the population is nearly gone. The thrill of digging for bait is almost as good as catching fish, especially if you're not too hungry; and today, that part can be all yours. I suggest you use the spade down by the ground-nuts, where you see the johnswort swaying. I can promise you'll find one worm for every three clumps of grass you dig up, as long as you check carefully among the grass roots, like you’re weeding. Or, if you decide to go farther, that wouldn’t be a bad idea, since I’ve noticed that finding good bait is roughly proportional to the square of the distance you go.

Hermit alone. Let me see; where was I? Methinks I was nearly in this frame of mind; the world lay about at this angle. Shall I go to heaven or a-fishing? If I should soon bring this meditation to an end, would another so sweet occasion be likely to offer? I was as near being resolved into the essence of things as ever I was in my life. I fear my thoughts will not come back to me. If it would do any good, I would whistle for them. When they make us an offer, is it wise to say, We will think of it? My thoughts have left no track, and I cannot find the path again. What was it that I was thinking of? It was a very hazy day. I will just try these three sentences of Con-fut-see; they may fetch that state about again. I know not whether it was the dumps or a budding ecstasy. Mem. There never is but one opportunity of a kind.

Hermit alone. Let me think; where was I? I think I was almost in this mindset; the world looked like this from here. Should I go to heaven or go fishing? If I wrap up this thought process soon, will another chance like this come around? I was as close to understanding the essence of things as I've ever been. I worry my thoughts won't return to me. If it would help, I would whistle for them. When they make us an offer, is it smart to say, we’ll think about it? My thoughts have left no trace, and I can’t find the way back. What was I thinking about? It was a really foggy day. I’ll just try these three lines of Confucian wisdom; they might help bring back that feeling. I don’t know if I was feeling down or having a moment of joy. Note: There’s never more than one opportunity like this.

Poet. How now, Hermit, is it too soon? I have got just thirteen whole ones, beside several which are imperfect or undersized; but they will do for the smaller fry; they do not cover up the hook so much. Those village worms are quite too large; a shiner may make a meal off one without finding the skewer.

Poet. Hey, Hermit, is it too early? I’ve got exactly thirteen good ones, plus a few that are small or not quite right; but they'll work for the smaller fish since they don’t hide the hook as much. Those village worms are way too big; a shiner could eat one without even noticing the hook.

Hermit. Well, then, let’s be off. Shall we to the Concord? There’s good sport there if the water be not too high.

Hermit. Alright, let’s get going. Are we headed to the Concord? There’s some good fun to be had there if the water levels aren’t too high.

Why do precisely these objects which we behold make a world? Why has man just these species of animals for his neighbors; as if nothing but a mouse could have filled this crevice? I suspect that Pilpay & Co. have put animals to their best use, for they are all beasts of burden, in a sense, made to carry some portion of our thoughts.

Why do the specific objects we see create a world? Why has humanity only these types of animals as neighbors, as if only a mouse could fit into this space? I suspect that Pilpay & Co. have utilized animals to their fullest, as they all serve as beasts of burden in a way, meant to carry some part of our thoughts.

The mice which haunted my house were not the common ones, which are said to have been introduced into the country, but a wild native kind not found in the village. I sent one to a distinguished naturalist, and it interested him much. When I was building, one of these had its nest underneath the house, and before I had laid the second floor, and swept out the shavings, would come out regularly at lunch time and pick up the crumbs at my feet. It probably had never seen a man before; and it soon became quite familiar, and would run over my shoes and up my clothes. It could readily ascend the sides of the room by short impulses, like a squirrel, which it resembled in its motions. At length, as I leaned with my elbow on the bench one day, it ran up my clothes, and along my sleeve, and round and round the paper which held my dinner, while I kept the latter close, and dodged and played at bopeep with it; and when at last I held still a piece of cheese between my thumb and finger, it came and nibbled it, sitting in my hand, and afterward cleaned its face and paws, like a fly, and walked away.

The mice that lived in my house weren't the usual ones that are said to have been brought into the country; they were a wild native species not found in the village. I sent one to a well-known naturalist, and he found it very interesting. When I was building, one of these mice made its nest under the house, and before I had even finished the second floor or cleaned up the sawdust, it would come out regularly at lunchtime to grab crumbs at my feet. It probably had never seen a human before, and it soon got quite comfortable, running over my shoes and up my clothes. It could easily climb the walls of the room in quick little bursts, similar to a squirrel, which it mirrored in its movements. Eventually, as I leaned with my elbow on the bench one day, it scampered up my clothes, along my sleeve, and around the paper that held my lunch, while I kept the paper close, dodging and playing peek-a-boo with it. Finally, when I held a piece of cheese still between my thumb and finger, it came over and nibbled on it while sitting in my hand, then cleaned its face and paws like a fly before walking away.

A phœbe soon built in my shed, and a robin for protection in a pine which grew against the house. In June the partridge (Tetrao umbellus,) which is so shy a bird, led her brood past my windows, from the woods in the rear to the front of my house, clucking and calling to them like a hen, and in all her behavior proving herself the hen of the woods. The young suddenly disperse on your approach, at a signal from the mother, as if a whirlwind had swept them away, and they so exactly resemble the dried leaves and twigs that many a traveler has placed his foot in the midst of a brood, and heard the whir of the old bird as she flew off, and her anxious calls and mewing, or seen her trail her wings to attract his attention, without suspecting their neighborhood. The parent will sometimes roll and spin round before you in such a dishabille, that you cannot, for a few moments, detect what kind of creature it is. The young squat still and flat, often running their heads under a leaf, and mind only their mother’s directions given from a distance, nor will your approach make them run again and betray themselves. You may even tread on them, or have your eyes on them for a minute, without discovering them. I have held them in my open hand at such a time, and still their only care, obedient to their mother and their instinct, was to squat there without fear or trembling. So perfect is this instinct, that once, when I had laid them on the leaves again, and one accidentally fell on its side, it was found with the rest in exactly the same position ten minutes afterward. They are not callow like the young of most birds, but more perfectly developed and precocious even than chickens. The remarkably adult yet innocent expression of their open and serene eyes is very memorable. All intelligence seems reflected in them. They suggest not merely the purity of infancy, but a wisdom clarified by experience. Such an eye was not born when the bird was, but is coeval with the sky it reflects. The woods do not yield another such a gem. The traveller does not often look into such a limpid well. The ignorant or reckless sportsman often shoots the parent at such a time, and leaves these innocents to fall a prey to some prowling beast or bird, or gradually mingle with the decaying leaves which they so much resemble. It is said that when hatched by a hen they will directly disperse on some alarm, and so are lost, for they never hear the mother’s call which gathers them again. These were my hens and chickens.

A phoebe quickly built a nest in my shed, while a robin made her home in a pine tree beside the house for safety. In June, a partridge (Tetrao umbellus), which is usually a very shy bird, led her chicks past my windows, moving from the woods in back to the front of my house. She clucked and called to them like a hen, showing herself to be the mother of the woods. The little ones would suddenly scatter at her signal, appearing as if a whirlwind had swept them away, and they blend in so perfectly with dry leaves and twigs that countless travelers have unknowingly stepped right into the middle of a brood, only to hear the whir of the mother bird taking off and her anxious calls. Sometimes, the mother will roll and spin in front of you in such a disheveled way that it takes you a moment to figure out what kind of bird she is. The young chicks stay still and flat, often hiding their heads under a leaf, focusing only on their mother’s distant calls. Your approach won’t make them run or give away their location. You could even step right on them or watch them for a minute without noticing them. I have held them in my open hand at those moments, and their only instinct, remaining obedient to their mother, was to stay there calmly. Their instinct is so strong that once, when I placed them back on the leaves and one accidentally rolled onto its side, I found it back in exactly the same position ten minutes later. They aren’t helpless like most young birds but are actually more developed and mature than chicks. The strikingly adult yet innocent look in their open, serene eyes is unforgettable. They seem to reflect all intelligence. They evoke not just the innocence of youth but also a wisdom shaped by experience. Such eyes weren’t created when the bird hatched but have existed alongside the sky they mirror. The woods don’t produce another treasure like this. Travelers rarely find such a clear, pure essence. Unfortunately, ignorant or reckless hunters often shoot the mother during this time, leaving her helpless chicks vulnerable to predators or slowly blending into the decaying leaves that they mimic so well. It’s said that if they are raised by a hen, they will scatter at the slightest alarm and get lost, unable to hear their mother’s call to gather them again. These were my hens and chickens.

It is remarkable how many creatures live wild and free though secret in the woods, and still sustain themselves in the neighborhood of towns, suspected by hunters only. How retired the otter manages to live here! He grows to be four feet long, as big as a small boy, perhaps without any human being getting a glimpse of him. I formerly saw the raccoon in the woods behind where my house is built, and probably still heard their whinnering at night. Commonly I rested an hour or two in the shade at noon, after planting, and ate my lunch, and read a little by a spring which was the source of a swamp and of a brook, oozing from under Brister’s Hill, half a mile from my field. The approach to this was through a succession of descending grassy hollows, full of young pitch-pines, into a larger wood about the swamp. There, in a very secluded and shaded spot, under a spreading white-pine, there was yet a clean, firm sward to sit on. I had dug out the spring and made a well of clear gray water, where I could dip up a pailful without roiling it, and thither I went for this purpose almost every day in midsummer, when the pond was warmest. Thither, too, the wood-cock led her brood, to probe the mud for worms, flying but a foot above them down the bank, while they ran in a troop beneath; but at last, spying me, she would leave her young and circle round and round me, nearer and nearer till within four or five feet, pretending broken wings and legs, to attract my attention, and get off her young, who would already have taken up their march, with faint wiry peep, single file through the swamp, as she directed. Or I heard the peep of the young when I could not see the parent bird. There too the turtle-doves sat over the spring, or fluttered from bough to bough of the soft white-pines over my head; or the red squirrel, coursing down the nearest bough, was particularly familiar and inquisitive. You only need sit still long enough in some attractive spot in the woods that all its inhabitants may exhibit themselves to you by turns.

It’s amazing how many creatures live wild and free, yet hidden in the woods, managing to survive near towns, only suspected by hunters. Just look at how secretive the otter is! He can grow to be four feet long, about the size of a small boy, perhaps without a single human catching sight of him. I used to see raccoons in the woods behind my house, and I probably still heard their whimpering at night. Usually, I would rest for an hour or two in the shade at noon after planting, eating my lunch and reading a bit by a spring that fed into a swamp and a brook, trickling out from under Brister’s Hill, half a mile from my field. The path to this spring was through a series of descending grassy dips filled with young pitch pines, leading into a larger forest by the swamp. There, in a very quiet and shaded spot under a spreading white pine, there was still a clean, firm patch of ground to sit on. I had dug out the spring and created a well of clear gray water, where I could fill a bucket without stirring up the sediment, and I went there for this purpose almost every day in the summer when the pond was warmest. It was also where the woodcock led her chicks to search the muddy ground for worms, flying just a foot above them along the bank while they trotted below in a line; but when she spotted me, she would leave her young ones and fly in circles around me, getting closer and closer until she was just four or five feet away, pretending her wings and legs were hurt to grab my attention, all the while getting her chicks to move along, making faint peeping sounds in single file through the swamp as she guided them. Even when I couldn’t see the mother bird, I could hear the peeps of her young. The turtle doves would sit over the spring or flutter from branch to branch in the soft white pines above me, and the red squirrel, racing down the nearest branch, was particularly curious and friendly. You just have to sit still long enough in a nice spot in the woods for all its residents to reveal themselves to you one by one.

I was witness to events of a less peaceful character. One day when I went out to my wood-pile, or rather my pile of stumps, I observed two large ants, the one red, the other much larger, nearly half an inch long, and black, fiercely contending with one another. Having once got hold they never let go, but struggled and wrestled and rolled on the chips incessantly. Looking farther, I was surprised to find that the chips were covered with such combatants, that it was not a duellum, but a bellum, a war between two races of ants, the red always pitted against the black, and frequently two red ones to one black. The legions of these Myrmidons covered all the hills and vales in my wood-yard, and the ground was already strewn with the dead and dying, both red and black. It was the only battle which I have ever witnessed, the only battle-field I ever trod while the battle was raging; internecine war; the red republicans on the one hand, and the black imperialists on the other. On every side they were engaged in deadly combat, yet without any noise that I could hear, and human soldiers never fought so resolutely. I watched a couple that were fast locked in each other’s embraces, in a little sunny valley amid the chips, now at noon-day prepared to fight till the sun went down, or life went out. The smaller red champion had fastened himself like a vice to his adversary’s front, and through all the tumblings on that field never for an instant ceased to gnaw at one of his feelers near the root, having already caused the other to go by the board; while the stronger black one dashed him from side to side, and, as I saw on looking nearer, had already divested him of several of his members. They fought with more pertinacity than bull-dogs. Neither manifested the least disposition to retreat. It was evident that their battle-cry was Conquer or die. In the mean while there came along a single red ant on the hill-side of this valley, evidently full of excitement, who either had despatched his foe, or had not yet taken part in the battle; probably the latter, for he had lost none of his limbs; whose mother had charged him to return with his shield or upon it. Or perchance he was some Achilles, who had nourished his wrath apart, and had now come to avenge or rescue his Patroclus. He saw this unequal combat from afar,—for the blacks were nearly twice the size of the red,—he drew near with rapid pace till he stood on his guard within half an inch of the combatants; then, watching his opportunity, he sprang upon the black warrior, and commenced his operations near the root of his right fore-leg, leaving the foe to select among his own members; and so there were three united for life, as if a new kind of attraction had been invented which put all other locks and cements to shame. I should not have wondered by this time to find that they had their respective musical bands stationed on some eminent chip, and playing their national airs the while, to excite the slow and cheer the dying combatants. I was myself excited somewhat even as if they had been men. The more you think of it, the less the difference. And certainly there is not the fight recorded in Concord history, at least, if in the history of America, that will bear a moment’s comparison with this, whether for the numbers engaged in it, or for the patriotism and heroism displayed. For numbers and for carnage it was an Austerlitz or Dresden. Concord Fight! Two killed on the patriots’ side, and Luther Blanchard wounded! Why here every ant was a Buttrick,—“Fire! for God’s sake fire!”—and thousands shared the fate of Davis and Hosmer. There was not one hireling there. I have no doubt that it was a principle they fought for, as much as our ancestors, and not to avoid a three-penny tax on their tea; and the results of this battle will be as important and memorable to those whom it concerns as those of the battle of Bunker Hill, at least.

I witnessed some pretty intense events. One day, when I went out to my woodpile, or rather my pile of stumps, I noticed two large ants—one red and the other much bigger, almost half an inch long and black—fighting fiercely. Once they grabbed hold of each other, they didn’t let go, struggling, wrestling, and rolling on the wood chips non-stop. Looking closer, I was surprised to see that the chips were covered with these fighters, not just a duel but a full-fledged war between two species of ants, with the red ones constantly battling against the black ones, often two reds taking on one black. These armies of ants filled all the hills and valleys in my wood yard, and the ground was already littered with the dead and dying, both red and black. It was the only battle I’ve ever seen, the only battlefield I ever walked on while a fight was happening; a war between the red republicans on one side and the black imperialists on the other. They fought fiercely on all sides, yet I couldn't hear a sound, and no human soldiers ever fought with such determination. I watched a pair that were locked in combat in a little sunny valley among the chips, prepared to fight until sunset or until one of them was lifeless. The smaller red fighter clung like a vice to his opponent’s front and never stopped gnawing at one of his feelers, having already managed to bite off the other; while the stronger black one tossed him around, and upon closer inspection, had already dismembered several parts of him. They fought with more persistence than bulldogs. Neither showed the slightest inclination to back down. It was clear that their battle-cry was "Conquer or die." Then, a single red ant came along the hillside, clearly excited, who either had defeated his opponent or hadn’t yet engaged in the battle; likely the latter, since he hadn’t lost any limbs. His mother probably told him to return with his shield or on it. Or maybe he was an Achilles, nurturing his fury separately, ready to avenge or rescue his Patroclus. He saw this uneven battle from a distance—the blacks were almost twice the size of the reds—he raced over until he was close enough to position himself within half an inch of the fighters; then, watching for his chance, he sprang onto the black warrior, targeting the root of his right foreleg, leaving the foe to deal with his own limbs; and so three became intertwined for life, as if some new force had been invented that made all other locks and bonds look weak. I wouldn't have been surprised to find that they had their respective musical groups set up on some prominent chip, playing their national anthems to energize the slow and encourage the dying fighters. I felt a bit stirred up myself, almost as if they were humans. The more you think about it, the less the difference seems. And for sure, there's no fight in the history of Concord, or even in American history, that can compare with this, whether in the number of fighters involved or the patriotism and bravery shown. In numbers and slaughter, it was like Austerlitz or Dresden. Concord Fight! Two killed on the patriots' side, and Luther Blanchard wounded! Here, every ant was a Buttrick—“Fire! for God’s sake, fire!”—and thousands met the same fate as Davis and Hosmer. There wasn’t a single hired hand there. I’m sure they fought for a principle as much as our ancestors did, not just to avoid a three-penny tax on tea; and the outcomes of this battle will be just as significant and memorable to those it affects as the battle of Bunker Hill, at the very least.

I took up the chip on which the three I have particularly described were struggling, carried it into my house, and placed it under a tumbler on my window-sill, in order to see the issue. Holding a microscope to the first-mentioned red ant, I saw that, though he was assiduously gnawing at the near fore-leg of his enemy, having severed his remaining feeler, his own breast was all torn away, exposing what vitals he had there to the jaws of the black warrior, whose breastplate was apparently too thick for him to pierce; and the dark carbuncles of the sufferer’s eyes shone with ferocity such as war only could excite. They struggled half an hour longer under the tumbler, and when I looked again the black soldier had severed the heads of his foes from their bodies, and the still living heads were hanging on either side of him like ghastly trophies at his saddle-bow, still apparently as firmly fastened as ever, and he was endeavoring with feeble struggles, being without feelers and with only the remnant of a leg, and I know not how many other wounds, to divest himself of them; which at length, after half an hour more, he accomplished. I raised the glass, and he went off over the window-sill in that crippled state. Whether he finally survived that combat, and spent the remainder of his days in some Hotel des Invalides, I do not know; but I thought that his industry would not be worth much thereafter. I never learned which party was victorious, nor the cause of the war; but I felt for the rest of that day as if I had had my feelings excited and harrowed by witnessing the struggle, the ferocity and carnage, of a human battle before my door.

I picked up the chip where the three ants I mentioned earlier were fighting, carried it into my house, and placed it under a glass on my window-sill to see what would happen. Looking through a microscope at the first red ant, I noticed that while he was diligently biting at the nearby leg of his opponent, having already bitten off one of its feelers, his own chest was completely torn open, exposing his insides to the jaws of the black warrior, whose armor seemed too thick for him to break through. The dark, glistening eyes of the injured ant were filled with a fierce rage that only battle could bring. They struggled for another half an hour under the glass, and when I checked again, the black soldier had cut off the heads of his enemies, which were still hanging on either side of him like macabre trophies, seemingly still attached. He was trying feebly to shake them off, having lost his feelers and with only a stub of a leg, along with who knows how many other injuries, and finally, after another half hour, he managed to do it. I lifted the glass, and he crawled away over the window-sill in that damaged state. Whether he ultimately survived that fight and spent his remaining days in some kind of infirmary, I have no idea; but I figured his work would be of little value after that. I never found out which side won or what caused the battle; but for the rest of that day, I felt as if I had experienced the intense emotions and horrors of a human battle right outside my door.

Kirby and Spence tell us that the battles of ants have long been celebrated and the date of them recorded, though they say that Huber is the only modern author who appears to have witnessed them. “Æneas Sylvius,” say they, “after giving a very circumstantial account of one contested with great obstinacy by a great and small species on the trunk of a pear tree,” adds that “‘This action was fought in the pontificate of Eugenius the Fourth, in the presence of Nicholas Pistoriensis, an eminent lawyer, who related the whole history of the battle with the greatest fidelity.’ A similar engagement between great and small ants is recorded by Olaus Magnus, in which the small ones, being victorious, are said to have buried the bodies of their own soldiers, but left those of their giant enemies a prey to the birds. This event happened previous to the expulsion of the tyrant Christiern the Second from Sweden.” The battle which I witnessed took place in the Presidency of Polk, five years before the passage of Webster’s Fugitive-Slave Bill.

Kirby and Spence tell us that ant battles have long been celebrated and documented, although they mention that Huber is the only modern author who seems to have actually observed them. “Æneas Sylvius,” they note, “after providing a very detailed description of one fight that was fiercely contested between large and small species on the trunk of a pear tree,” adds that “‘This battle took place during the papacy of Eugenius the Fourth, in the presence of Nicholas Pistoriensis, a distinguished lawyer, who recounted the entire history of the battle with great accuracy.’ A similar fight between large and small ants is recorded by Olaus Magnus, in which the small ants, victorious, are said to have buried their own soldiers but left the bodies of their giant enemies for the birds. This event occurred before the expulsion of the tyrant Christiern the Second from Sweden.” The battle I witnessed happened during Polk's presidency, five years before the passage of Webster’s Fugitive-Slave Bill.

Many a village Bose, fit only to course a mud-turtle in a victualling cellar, sported his heavy quarters in the woods, without the knowledge of his master, and ineffectually smelled at old fox burrows and woodchucks’ holes; led perchance by some slight cur which nimbly threaded the wood, and might still inspire a natural terror in its denizens;—now far behind his guide, barking like a canine bull toward some small squirrel which had treed itself for scrutiny, then, cantering off, bending the bushes with his weight, imagining that he is on the track of some stray member of the jerbilla family. Once I was surprised to see a cat walking along the stony shore of the pond, for they rarely wander so far from home. The surprise was mutual. Nevertheless the most domestic cat, which has lain on a rug all her days, appears quite at home in the woods, and, by her sly and stealthy behavior, proves herself more native there than the regular inhabitants. Once, when berrying, I met with a cat with young kittens in the woods, quite wild, and they all, like their mother, had their backs up and were fiercely spitting at me. A few years before I lived in the woods there was what was called a “winged cat” in one of the farm-houses in Lincoln nearest the pond, Mr. Gilian Baker’s. When I called to see her in June, 1842, she was gone a-hunting in the woods, as was her wont, (I am not sure whether it was a male or female, and so use the more common pronoun,) but her mistress told me that she came into the neighborhood a little more than a year before, in April, and was finally taken into their house; that she was of a dark brownish-gray color, with a white spot on her throat, and white feet, and had a large bushy tail like a fox; that in the winter the fur grew thick and flatted out along her sides, forming stripes ten or twelve inches long by two and a half wide, and under her chin like a muff, the upper side loose, the under matted like felt, and in the spring these appendages dropped off. They gave me a pair of her “wings,” which I keep still. There is no appearance of a membrane about them. Some thought it was part flying-squirrel or some other wild animal, which is not impossible, for, according to naturalists, prolific hybrids have been produced by the union of the marten and domestic cat. This would have been the right kind of cat for me to keep, if I had kept any; for why should not a poet’s cat be winged as well as his horse?

Many a village dog, only good for chasing mud turtles in a grocery cellar, wandered around the woods without his owner knowing, ineffectively sniffing at old fox dens and groundhog holes, maybe led by some small mutt that darted through the trees, still capable of scaring the local wildlife. Now far behind his guide, he barked like a giant dog at a little squirrel that had climbed up a tree to observe him, then trotted off, bending the branches with his weight, thinking he was tracking some lost relative of the jerbilla family. Once, I was startled to see a cat walking along the rocky shore of the pond, as they rarely venture that far from home. The surprise was mutual. Yet even the most pampered cat, who has spent all her life lying on a rug, seems right at home in the woods and proves herself more at ease there than the native animals with her sly and sneaky behavior. Once, while picking berries, I came across a wild cat with kittens in the woods, and they all, like their mother, were hissing at me with their backs arched. A few years before I moved to the woods, there was a so-called “winged cat” at one of the farmhouses in Lincoln nearest the pond, Mr. Gilian Baker's. When I went to visit her in June 1842, she was off hunting in the woods, as she often did (I’m not sure whether it was a male or female, so I’ll use the more common pronoun), but her owner told me that she had come to the neighborhood a little over a year earlier, in April, and was eventually welcomed into their home. She had a dark brownish-gray coat with a white patch on her throat and white feet, plus a large bushy tail like a fox. In winter, her fur thickened and flattened out along her sides, forming stripes about ten to twelve inches long and two and a half wide, with fluffy fur under her chin like a muff; the top side was loose, while the underside was matted like felt, and then in spring, these extra fur bits fell off. They gave me a pair of her "wings," which I still have. There’s no sign of any membrane on them. Some believed it was part flying squirrel or another wild animal, which isn’t impossible, since, according to naturalists, fertile hybrids can result from the mating of a marten and a domestic cat. This would have been the perfect cat for me to keep, if I had decided to have one; after all, why shouldn’t a poet’s cat have wings just like his horse?

In the fall the loon (Colymbus glacialis) came, as usual, to moult and bathe in the pond, making the woods ring with his wild laughter before I had risen. At rumor of his arrival all the Mill-dam sportsmen are on the alert, in gigs and on foot, two by two and three by three, with patent rifles and conical balls and spy-glasses. They come rustling through the woods like autumn leaves, at least ten men to one loon. Some station themselves on this side of the pond, some on that, for the poor bird cannot be omnipresent; if he dive here he must come up there. But now the kind October wind rises, rustling the leaves and rippling the surface of the water, so that no loon can be heard or seen, though his foes sweep the pond with spy-glasses, and make the woods resound with their discharges. The waves generously rise and dash angrily, taking sides with all water-fowl, and our sportsmen must beat a retreat to town and shop and unfinished jobs. But they were too often successful. When I went to get a pail of water early in the morning I frequently saw this stately bird sailing out of my cove within a few rods. If I endeavored to overtake him in a boat, in order to see how he would manœuvre, he would dive and be completely lost, so that I did not discover him again, sometimes, till the latter part of the day. But I was more than a match for him on the surface. He commonly went off in a rain.

In the fall, the loon (Colymbus glacialis) arrived, as always, to molt and swim in the pond, filling the woods with his wild laughter before I got up. As soon as they heard about his arrival, all the Mill-dam hunters got ready, arriving in boats and on foot, in pairs and small groups, equipped with modern rifles, conical bullets, and binoculars. They moved through the woods like falling leaves, with at least ten men for every loon. Some set up on one side of the pond, others on the opposite side, knowing the poor bird couldn’t be everywhere; if he dived in one spot, he’d have to come up in another. But then the gentle October wind picked up, rustling the leaves and creating ripples on the water, making it impossible to see or hear the loon, even as his would-be captors scanned the pond with their binoculars and echoed gunshots through the woods. The waves roared and crashed angrily, siding with all the waterfowl, forcing our hunters to retreat back to town, their shops, and unfinished tasks. Yet, they often succeeded. When I went to fetch a bucket of water early in the morning, I would frequently spot this majestic bird gliding out of my cove just a short distance away. If I tried to catch up with him in a boat to see how he’d maneuver, he would dive and disappear completely, sometimes not reappearing until later in the day. But I was more than capable of outsmarting him on the surface. He usually left when it was raining.

As I was paddling along the north shore one very calm October afternoon, for such days especially they settle on to the lakes, like the milkweed down, having looked in vain over the pond for a loon, suddenly one, sailing out from the shore toward the middle a few rods in front of me, set up his wild laugh and betrayed himself. I pursued with a paddle and he dived, but when he came up I was nearer than before. He dived again, but I miscalculated the direction he would take, and we were fifty rods apart when he came to the surface this time, for I had helped to widen the interval; and again he laughed long and loud, and with more reason than before. He manœuvred so cunningly that I could not get within half a dozen rods of him. Each time, when he came to the surface, turning his head this way and that, he cooly surveyed the water and the land, and apparently chose his course so that he might come up where there was the widest expanse of water and at the greatest distance from the boat. It was surprising how quickly he made up his mind and put his resolve into execution. He led me at once to the widest part of the pond, and could not be driven from it. While he was thinking one thing in his brain, I was endeavoring to divine his thought in mine. It was a pretty game, played on the smooth surface of the pond, a man against a loon. Suddenly your adversary’s checker disappears beneath the board, and the problem is to place yours nearest to where his will appear again. Sometimes he would come up unexpectedly on the opposite side of me, having apparently passed directly under the boat. So long-winded was he and so unweariable, that when he had swum farthest he would immediately plunge again, nevertheless; and then no wit could divine where in the deep pond, beneath the smooth surface, he might be speeding his way like a fish, for he had time and ability to visit the bottom of the pond in its deepest part. It is said that loons have been caught in the New York lakes eighty feet beneath the surface, with hooks set for trout,—though Walden is deeper than that. How surprised must the fishes be to see this ungainly visitor from another sphere speeding his way amid their schools! Yet he appeared to know his course as surely under water as on the surface, and swam much faster there. Once or twice I saw a ripple where he approached the surface, just put his head out to reconnoitre, and instantly dived again. I found that it was as well for me to rest on my oars and wait his reappearing as to endeavor to calculate where he would rise; for again and again, when I was straining my eyes over the surface one way, I would suddenly be startled by his unearthly laugh behind me. But why, after displaying so much cunning, did he invariably betray himself the moment he came up by that loud laugh? Did not his white breast enough betray him? He was indeed a silly loon, I thought. I could commonly hear the splash of the water when he came up, and so also detected him. But after an hour he seemed as fresh as ever, dived as willingly and swam yet farther than at first. It was surprising to see how serenely he sailed off with unruffled breast when he came to the surface, doing all the work with his webbed feet beneath. His usual note was this demoniac laughter, yet somewhat like that of a water-fowl; but occasionally, when he had balked me most successfully and come up a long way off, he uttered a long-drawn unearthly howl, probably more like that of a wolf than any bird; as when a beast puts his muzzle to the ground and deliberately howls. This was his looning,—perhaps the wildest sound that is ever heard here, making the woods ring far and wide. I concluded that he laughed in derision of my efforts, confident of his own resources. Though the sky was by this time overcast, the pond was so smooth that I could see where he broke the surface when I did not hear him. His white breast, the stillness of the air, and the smoothness of the water were all against him. At length, having come up fifty rods off, he uttered one of those prolonged howls, as if calling on the god of loons to aid him, and immediately there came a wind from the east and rippled the surface, and filled the whole air with misty rain, and I was impressed as if it were the prayer of the loon answered, and his god was angry with me; and so I left him disappearing far away on the tumultuous surface.

As I was paddling along the north shore one calm October afternoon, those peaceful days especially settle over the lakes like milkweed fluff. After looking around the pond without spotting a loon, suddenly one emerged from the shore and swam several yards in front of me, letting out its wild laugh and revealing its presence. I chased it with my paddle, and it dove, but when it came up, I was closer than before. It dove again, but I misjudged its direction, and when it resurfaced this time, we were fifty yards apart because I had widened the gap. Again, it laughed long and loud, with good reason. It maneuvered so skillfully that I couldn’t get within six yards of it. Each time it surfaced, turning its head this way and that, it calmly scanned the water and the shore, seemingly choosing its course to pop up where there was the widest space and farthest from my boat. It was impressive how quickly it made decisions and acted on them. It led me straight to the widest part of the pond and wouldn't be pushed away. While it was thinking one thing, I was trying to guess its thoughts. It was a fun game, played on the smooth surface of the pond: a man against a loon. Suddenly, your opponent's checker disappears beneath the board, and the challenge is to place yours as close as possible to where his will appear again. Occasionally, it would unexpectedly surface on the opposite side of me, having apparently swum directly under the boat. It was so agile and tireless that when it swam the farthest, it would immediately dive again; no intelligence could predict where in the deep pond, beneath the smooth surface, it might be moving like a fish, as it had plenty of time and skill to explore the bottom. They say loons have been caught in New York lakes eighty feet below the surface with hooks set for trout—though Walden is even deeper. How surprised the fish must be to see this awkward visitor from another world gliding through their schools! Yet it seemed to know its path as confidently underwater as on the surface, swimming much faster down there. Once or twice, I saw a ripple as it approached the surface, poked its head up to survey, and then dove again instantly. I found it was better to rest on my oars and wait for it to surface again than to try to guess where it would reappear because time and again, when I was straining my eyes in one direction, I would suddenly jump at its otherworldly laugh behind me. But why, after being so clever, did it always give itself away with that loud laugh the moment it surfaced? Wasn't its white breast enough to reveal it? It really was a silly loon, I thought. I could usually hear the splash when it surfaced and could spot it that way. But after an hour, it seemed as fresh as ever, diving eagerly and swimming even farther than at first. It was surprising to see how calmly it sailed with its sleek breast when it came to the surface, doing all the work with its webbed feet below. Its usual call was that eerie laughter, somewhat like that of a waterfowl; but occasionally, after it had successfully outsmarted me and emerged far away, it let out a long, haunting howl—probably more like a wolf than any bird—like when a beast puts its muzzle to the ground and howls deliberately. This was its call—a sound that could be the wildest heard in these parts, echoing through the woods. I suspected it laughed at my efforts, assured of its own abilities. Though the sky was now overcast, the pond was so smooth that I could see where it broke the surface even when I didn’t hear it. Its white breast, the stillness of the air, and the calmness of the water all worked against it. Finally, after resurfacing fifty yards away, it let out one of those prolonged howls, as if calling on the god of loons for help, and immediately a wind came from the east, rippling the surface, and filling the air with misty rain, leaving me with the impression that the loon’s prayer had been answered and its god was angry with me; and so I left it disappearing far off on the choppy surface.

For hours, in fall days, I watched the ducks cunningly tack and veer and hold the middle of the pond, far from the sportsman; tricks which they will have less need to practise in Louisiana bayous. When compelled to rise they would sometimes circle round and round and over the pond at a considerable height, from which they could easily see to other ponds and the river, like black motes in the sky; and, when I thought they had gone off thither long since, they would settle down by a slanting flight of a quarter of a mile on to a distant part which was left free; but what beside safety they got by sailing in the middle of Walden I do not know, unless they love its water for the same reason that I do.

For hours, on fall days, I watched the ducks skillfully navigate and change direction, staying toward the center of the pond, far away from the hunter. They won’t need to practice these tricks as much in the bayous of Louisiana. When they had to take off, they sometimes circled high above the pond, allowing them to see other ponds and the river, like tiny black specks in the sky. Just when I thought they had flown off for good, they would glide down in a slanted descent over a quarter of a mile to land on a distant area that was free. But aside from safety, I’m not sure what they gained from flying in the middle of Walden, unless they love its water as much as I do.

House-Warming

In October I went a-graping to the river meadows, and loaded myself with clusters more precious for their beauty and fragrance than for food. There too I admired, though I did not gather, the cranberries, small waxen gems, pendants of the meadow grass, pearly and red, which the farmer plucks with an ugly rake, leaving the smooth meadow in a snarl, heedlessly measuring them by the bushel and the dollar only, and sells the spoils of the meads to Boston and New York; destined to be jammed, to satisfy the tastes of lovers of Nature there. So butchers rake the tongues of bison out of the prairie grass, regardless of the torn and drooping plant. The barberry’s brilliant fruit was likewise food for my eyes merely; but I collected a small store of wild apples for coddling, which the proprietor and travellers had overlooked. When chestnuts were ripe I laid up half a bushel for winter. It was very exciting at that season to roam the then boundless chestnut woods of Lincoln,—they now sleep their long sleep under the railroad,—with a bag on my shoulder, and a stick to open burrs with in my hand, for I did not always wait for the frost, amid the rustling of leaves and the loud reproofs of the red-squirrels and the jays, whose half-consumed nuts I sometimes stole, for the burrs which they had selected were sure to contain sound ones. Occasionally I climbed and shook the trees. They grew also behind my house, and one large tree, which almost overshadowed it, was, when in flower, a bouquet which scented the whole neighborhood, but the squirrels and the jays got most of its fruit; the last coming in flocks early in the morning and picking the nuts out of the burrs before they fell. I relinquished these trees to them and visited the more distant woods composed wholly of chestnut. These nuts, as far as they went, were a good substitute for bread. Many other substitutes might, perhaps, be found. Digging one day for fish-worms, I discovered the ground-nut (Apios tuberosa) on its string, the potato of the aborigines, a sort of fabulous fruit, which I had begun to doubt if I had ever dug and eaten in childhood, as I had told, and had not dreamed it. I had often since seen its crimpled red velvety blossom supported by the stems of other plants without knowing it to be the same. Cultivation has well nigh exterminated it. It has a sweetish taste, much like that of a frostbitten potato, and I found it better boiled than roasted. This tuber seemed like a faint promise of Nature to rear her own children and feed them simply here at some future period. In these days of fatted cattle and waving grain-fields this humble root, which was once the totem of an Indian tribe, is quite forgotten, or known only by its flowering vine; but let wild Nature reign here once more, and the tender and luxurious English grains will probably disappear before a myriad of foes, and without the care of man the crow may carry back even the last seed of corn to the great cornfield of the Indian’s God in the south-west, whence he is said to have brought it; but the now almost exterminated ground-nut will perhaps revive and flourish in spite of frosts and wildness, prove itself indigenous, and resume its ancient importance and dignity as the diet of the hunter tribe. Some Indian Ceres or Minerva must have been the inventor and bestower of it; and when the reign of poetry commences here, its leaves and string of nuts may be represented on our works of art.

In October, I went grape picking in the river meadows and gathered clusters that were more beautiful and fragrant than useful for food. I also admired the cranberries, small waxy gems, hanging from the meadow grass, shiny and red, which farmers rake up with an ugly tool, leaving the meadows a mess, focused only on bushels and dollars, selling the fruits of the meadows to Boston and New York, destined to be made into jam for nature lovers there. Similarly, butchers scrape up bison tongues from the prairie grass without caring about the damaged plants. The bright berries of the barberry were just a feast for my eyes, but I collected a small stash of wild apples for cooking, which the owner and travelers had overlooked. When the chestnuts were ripe, I gathered half a bushel for winter. It was thrilling during that season to wander through the vast chestnut woods of Lincoln, now silent under the railroad, with a bag slung over my shoulder and a stick to pry open the burrs in my hand, as I didn’t always wait for frost, amid the rustling leaves and the loud scolding of the red squirrels and jays, whose half-eaten nuts I sometimes took, because the burrs they picked were sure to have good ones. Occasionally, I climbed and shook the trees. They also grew behind my house, and one large tree that almost overshadowed it was a bouquet of flowers that scented the whole neighborhood when in bloom, but the squirrels and jays got most of its nuts; the latter would come in flocks early in the morning, picking the nuts out of the burrs before they fell. I left these trees for them and explored the more distant woods filled with chestnuts. These nuts, as far as they went, were a decent substitute for bread. Many other substitutes could probably be found. One day while digging for fish worms, I discovered the ground-nut (Apios tuberosa) on its vine, the potato of the natives, a kind of legendary fruit, and I started to doubt whether I had actually dug it up and eaten it in my childhood as I claimed, or if I had just imagined it. I had often seen its crumpled red velvety blossoms supported by other plants without realizing they were the same. Cultivation has nearly wiped it out. It tastes somewhat sweet, much like a frostbitten potato, and I found it better boiled than roasted. This tuber seemed like a faint promise from nature to nurture her own children and feed them simply here in the future. In these days of fat cattle and waving grain fields, this humble root, once the totem of an Indian tribe, is mostly forgotten, known only by its flowering vine; but if wild nature takes over again, tender and rich English grains might disappear before countless enemies, and without human care, the crow might even bring back the last seed of corn to the great cornfield of the Indian’s God in the southwest, where it’s said to have originated; yet the nearly extinct ground-nut might revive and thrive despite frost and wildness, proving itself native and regaining its ancient significance and status as the food of the hunter tribe. Some Indian Ceres or Minerva must have been its creator and giver; and when poetry reigns here again, its leaves and string of nuts may be depicted in our art.

Already, by the first of September, I had seen two or three small maples turned scarlet across the pond, beneath where the white stems of three aspens diverged, at the point of a promontory, next the water. Ah, many a tale their color told! And gradually from week to week the character of each tree came out, and it admired itself reflected in the smooth mirror of the lake. Each morning the manager of this gallery substituted some new picture, distinguished by more brilliant or harmonious coloring, for the old upon the walls.

By the first of September, I had already seen a few small maples turn bright red across the pond, right below where the white trunks of three aspens split at the tip of a point by the water. Ah, their colors told so many stories! And slowly, week by week, the unique features of each tree emerged, and they admired their reflections in the lake's smooth surface. Each morning, the manager of this gallery replaced the old artworks on the walls with new ones, showcasing more vibrant or harmonious colors.

The wasps came by thousands to my lodge in October, as to winter quarters, and settled on my windows within and on the walls over-head, sometimes deterring visitors from entering. Each morning, when they were numbed with cold, I swept some of them out, but I did not trouble myself much to get rid of them; I even felt complimented by their regarding my house as a desirable shelter. They never molested me seriously, though they bedded with me; and they gradually disappeared, into what crevices I do not know, avoiding winter and unspeakable cold.

The wasps came by the thousands to my lodge in October, like they were looking for a winter home, and settled on my windows inside and on the walls above, sometimes making visitors think twice about coming in. Each morning, when they were sluggish from the cold, I swept some of them out, but I didn’t bother too much to get rid of them; I even felt flattered that they considered my place a good shelter. They never seriously bothered me, even though they shared my space; and they gradually disappeared into who knows where, avoiding winter and the freezing cold.

Like the wasps, before I finally went into winter quarters in November, I used to resort to the north-east side of Walden, which the sun, reflected from the pitch-pine woods and the stony shore, made the fire-side of the pond; it is so much pleasanter and wholesomer to be warmed by the sun while you can be, than by an artificial fire. I thus warmed myself by the still glowing embers which the summer, like a departed hunter, had left.

Like the wasps, before I finally settled in for the winter in November, I often went to the northeast side of Walden, where the sun, reflecting off the pitch-pine woods and the rocky shore, created a warm spot by the pond. It’s much nicer and healthier to be warmed by the sun while you can than by a man-made fire. I warmed myself by the still glowing embers that the summer, like a vanished hunter, had left behind.

When I came to build my chimney I studied masonry. My bricks being second-hand ones required to be cleaned with a trowel, so that I learned more than usual of the qualities of bricks and trowels. The mortar on them was fifty years old, and was said to be still growing harder; but this is one of those sayings which men love to repeat whether they are true or not. Such sayings themselves grow harder and adhere more firmly with age, and it would take many blows with a trowel to clean an old wiseacre of them. Many of the villages of Mesopotamia are built of second-hand bricks of a very good quality, obtained from the ruins of Babylon, and the cement on them is older and probably harder still. However that may be, I was struck by the peculiar toughness of the steel which bore so many violent blows without being worn out. As my bricks had been in a chimney before, though I did not read the name of Nebuchadnezzar on them, I picked out as many fire-place bricks as I could find, to save work and waste, and I filled the spaces between the bricks about the fire-place with stones from the pond shore, and also made my mortar with the white sand from the same place. I lingered most about the fireplace, as the most vital part of the house. Indeed, I worked so deliberately, that though I commenced at the ground in the morning, a course of bricks raised a few inches above the floor served for my pillow at night; yet I did not get a stiff neck for it that I remember; my stiff neck is of older date. I took a poet to board for a fortnight about those times, which caused me to be put to it for room. He brought his own knife, though I had two, and we used to scour them by thrusting them into the earth. He shared with me the labors of cooking. I was pleased to see my work rising so square and solid by degrees, and reflected, that, if it proceeded slowly, it was calculated to endure a long time. The chimney is to some extent an independent structure, standing on the ground and rising through the house to the heavens; even after the house is burned it still stands sometimes, and its importance and independence are apparent. This was toward the end of summer. It was now November.

When I started building my chimney, I studied masonry. Since my bricks were second-hand, I had to clean them with a trowel, which taught me more than I expected about the qualities of bricks and trowels. The mortar on them was fifty years old and was said to be still getting harder, but that's something people love to repeat whether it's true or not. Such sayings tend to get tougher and stick more firmly with age, and it would take a lot of effort with a trowel to change an old wiseacre's mind. Many villages in Mesopotamia are built from second-hand bricks of pretty good quality, sourced from the ruins of Babylon, and the cement on them is probably even older and harder. Regardless, I was impressed by the toughness of the steel that took so many hard hits without wearing out. Since my bricks had already been used in a chimney before, even though I didn’t see Nebuchadnezzar's name on them, I picked out as many fireplace bricks as I could find to save time and material. I filled the gaps around the fireplace with stones from the pond shore and made my mortar with the white sand from the same spot. I spent the most time focusing on the fireplace because it was the most crucial part of the house. In fact, I worked so carefully that even though I started at the ground in the morning, the course of bricks that rose a few inches above the floor became my pillow at night; yet I don’t remember getting a stiff neck from it; my stiff neck is from an earlier time. Around that time, I took in a poet for a couple of weeks, which made things a bit cramped. He brought his own knife, although I had two, and we would clean them by thrusting them into the ground. He helped me with cooking, too. I was glad to see my work gradually rising so square and solid, and thought that if it was progressing slowly, it was likely to last a long time. The chimney is somewhat of an independent structure, standing on the ground and reaching up through the house toward the sky; even after the house burns down, it sometimes still stands, showcasing its importance and independence. This was toward the end of summer. Now it was November.

The north wind had already begun to cool the pond, though it took many weeks of steady blowing to accomplish it, it is so deep. When I began to have a fire at evening, before I plastered my house, the chimney carried smoke particularly well, because of the numerous chinks between the boards. Yet I passed some cheerful evenings in that cool and airy apartment, surrounded by the rough brown boards full of knots, and rafters with the bark on high overhead. My house never pleased my eye so much after it was plastered, though I was obliged to confess that it was more comfortable. Should not every apartment in which man dwells be lofty enough to create some obscurity over-head, where flickering shadows may play at evening about the rafters? These forms are more agreeable to the fancy and imagination than fresco paintings or other the most expensive furniture. I now first began to inhabit my house, I may say, when I began to use it for warmth as well as shelter. I had got a couple of old fire-dogs to keep the wood from the hearth, and it did me good to see the soot form on the back of the chimney which I had built, and I poked the fire with more right and more satisfaction than usual. My dwelling was small, and I could hardly entertain an echo in it; but it seemed larger for being a single apartment and remote from neighbors. All the attractions of a house were concentrated in one room; it was kitchen, chamber, parlor, and keeping-room; and whatever satisfaction parent or child, master or servant, derive from living in a house, I enjoyed it all. Cato says, the master of a family (patremfamilias) must have in his rustic villa “cellam oleariam, vinariam, dolia multa, uti lubeat caritatem expectare, et rei, et virtuti, et gloriæ erit,” that is, “an oil and wine cellar, many casks, so that it may be pleasant to expect hard times; it will be for his advantage, and virtue, and glory.” I had in my cellar a firkin of potatoes, about two quarts of peas with the weevil in them, and on my shelf a little rice, a jug of molasses, and of rye and Indian meal a peck each.

The north wind had already started to cool the pond, though it took many weeks of consistent blowing to do so, since it's so deep. When I began having fires in the evenings, before I plastered my house, the chimney drew smoke particularly well because of the numerous gaps between the boards. Still, I enjoyed some cheerful evenings in that cool, airy space, surrounded by the rough brown boards full of knots and rafters with bark high overhead. My house never looked as good to me after it was plastered, although I had to admit it was more comfortable. Shouldn’t every space where a person lives be tall enough to create some shadows overhead, where flickering lights can dance in the evenings around the rafters? These shapes are more pleasing to the mind and imagination than fancy wall paintings or expensive furniture. I can say I truly started living in my house when I began using it for warmth as well as shelter. I had picked up a couple of old fire-dogs to keep the wood off the hearth, and it felt good to watch the soot form on the back of the chimney I built, and I poked the fire with a sense of right and satisfaction. My place was small, and I could hardly entertain even an echo in it; but it felt larger since it was just one room and away from neighbors. All the features of a home were concentrated in that one space; it served as kitchen, bedroom, living room, and pantry. Whatever joy a parent or child, master or servant, gets from living in a house, I enjoyed all of it. Cato says the head of a household (patremfamilias) should have in his country villa "an oil and wine cellar, many casks, so that it may be pleasant to anticipate hard times; it will be to his benefit, virtue, and glory." In my cellar, I had a small barrel of potatoes, about two quarts of peas with weevils in them, and on my shelf, a little rice, a jug of molasses, and a peck each of rye and cornmeal.

I sometimes dream of a larger and more populous house, standing in a golden age, of enduring materials, and without ginger-bread work, which shall still consist of only one room, a vast, rude, substantial, primitive hall, without ceiling or plastering, with bare rafters and purlins supporting a sort of lower heaven over one’s head,—useful to keep off rain and snow; where the king and queen posts stand out to receive your homage, when you have done reverence to the prostrate Saturn of an older dynasty on stepping over the sill; a cavernous house, wherein you must reach up a torch upon a pole to see the roof; where some may live in the fire-place, some in the recess of a window, and some on settles, some at one end of the hall, some at another, and some aloft on rafters with the spiders, if they choose; a house which you have got into when you have opened the outside door, and the ceremony is over; where the weary traveller may wash, and eat, and converse, and sleep, without further journey; such a shelter as you would be glad to reach in a tempestuous night, containing all the essentials of a house, and nothing for house-keeping; where you can see all the treasures of the house at one view, and every thing hangs upon its peg, that a man should use; at once kitchen, pantry, parlor, chamber, store-house, and garret; where you can see so necessary a thing as a barrel or a ladder, so convenient a thing as a cupboard, and hear the pot boil, and pay your respects to the fire that cooks your dinner and the oven that bakes your bread, and the necessary furniture and utensils are the chief ornaments; where the washing is not put out, nor the fire, nor the mistress, and perhaps you are sometimes requested to move from off the trap-door, when the cook would descend into the cellar, and so learn whether the ground is solid or hollow beneath you without stamping. A house whose inside is as open and manifest as a bird’s nest, and you cannot go in at the front door and out at the back without seeing some of its inhabitants; where to be a guest is to be presented with the freedom of the house, and not to be carefully excluded from seven eighths of it, shut up in a particular cell, and told to make yourself at home there,—in solitary confinement. Nowadays the host does not admit you to his hearth, but has got the mason to build one for yourself somewhere in his alley, and hospitality is the art of keeping you at the greatest distance. There is as much secrecy about the cooking as if he had a design to poison you. I am aware that I have been on many a man’s premises, and might have been legally ordered off, but I am not aware that I have been in many men’s houses. I might visit in my old clothes a king and queen who lived simply in such a house as I have described, if I were going their way; but backing out of a modern palace will be all that I shall desire to learn, if ever I am caught in one.

I sometimes dream of a bigger, more crowded house, set in a golden age, built to last and without fancy decorations, which would still be just one room—a large, rough, sturdy, simple hall, with no ceiling or plaster, just bare beams and rafters holding up a kind of lower sky overhead, useful for keeping off rain and snow. The king and queen's posts stand ready to receive your respect after you’ve acknowledged the fallen Saturn of an older era as you step inside. It's a cavernous home where you need to stretch up a torch on a pole to see the ceiling, where some might live by the fireplace, some in a window nook, others on benches, some at one end of the hall, others at the other, and some up among the rafters with the spiders if they want. You get in when you open the main door, and the formalities are over; it's a place for the tired traveler to wash, eat, chat, and sleep without needing to go any further—a shelter you'd be happy to reach on a stormy night, with all the essentials of a home and nothing extra for housekeeping. You can take in everything the house has to offer at a glance, and everything is hung on its peg for a person’s use; it serves as kitchen, pantry, living room, bedroom, storage, and attic. You can easily spot something as necessary as a barrel or a ladder, as handy as a cupboard, hear the pot boiling, and give respect to the fire that cooks your dinner and the oven that bakes your bread, where the essential appliances and tools are the main decorations. The washing isn’t outsourced, nor is the fire, nor the person who runs the house, and you might occasionally be asked to move from the trapdoor when the cook goes down to the cellar, allowing you to find out if the ground below is solid or hollow without making a scene. A house whose interior is as open and clear as a bird’s nest, where you can’t go in the front door and out the back without noticing some of its residents; where being a guest means being welcomed to enjoy the whole place, instead of being cut off from most of it, locked up in a specific room and told to feel at home there—in isolation. These days, the host doesn’t invite you to his hearth but has hired someone to build one for you somewhere in his alley, making hospitality an art of keeping you at arm's length. There’s as much secrecy in the cooking as if there were a plan to poison you. I know I’ve stepped onto many men’s properties and could have been legally asked to leave, but I can’t say I’ve been in many men’s homes. I could visit a king and queen living simply in such a house like I’ve described while wearing my old clothes, if I were heading their way; but if I ever find myself in a modern palace, all I’ll want to learn is how to back out of it.

It would seem as if the very language of our parlors would lose all its nerve and degenerate into palaver wholly, our lives pass at such remoteness from its symbols, and its metaphors and tropes are necessarily so far fetched, through slides and dumb-waiters, as it were; in other words, the parlor is so far from the kitchen and workshop. The dinner even is only the parable of a dinner, commonly. As if only the savage dwelt near enough to Nature and Truth to borrow a trope from them. How can the scholar, who dwells away in the North West Territory or the Isle of Man, tell what is parliamentary in the kitchen?

It seems like the language we use in our living rooms is losing its spirit and turning into just empty chatter, since our lives are so disconnected from its meanings, and its symbols, metaphors, and expressions feel really forced, like they come through chutes and dumbwaiters. In other words, the living room is really far from the kitchen and workshop. Even dinner is just a representation of dinner, for the most part. It’s like only those who live close to Nature and Truth can draw inspiration from them. How can a scholar, living far away in the Northwest Territories or the Isle of Man, understand what’s relevant in the kitchen?

However, only one or two of my guests were ever bold enough to stay and eat a hasty-pudding with me; but when they saw that crisis approaching they beat a hasty retreat rather, as if it would shake the house to its foundations. Nevertheless, it stood through a great many hasty-puddings.

However, only one or two of my guests were ever brave enough to stick around and have hasty pudding with me; but when they sensed that crisis coming, they made a quick exit, as if it would shake the house to its core. Still, it endured through a lot of hasty puddings.

I did not plaster till it was freezing weather. I brought over some whiter and cleaner sand for this purpose from the opposite shore of the pond in a boat, a sort of conveyance which would have tempted me to go much farther if necessary. My house had in the mean while been shingled down to the ground on every side. In lathing I was pleased to be able to send home each nail with a single blow of the hammer, and it was my ambition to transfer the plaster from the board to the wall neatly and rapidly. I remembered the story of a conceited fellow, who, in fine clothes, was wont to lounge about the village once, giving advice to workmen. Venturing one day to substitute deeds for words, he turned up his cuffs, seized a plasterer’s board, and having loaded his trowel without mishap, with a complacent look toward the lathing overhead, made a bold gesture thitherward; and straightway, to his complete discomfiture, received the whole contents in his ruffled bosom. I admired anew the economy and convenience of plastering, which so effectually shuts out the cold and takes a handsome finish, and I learned the various casualties to which the plasterer is liable. I was surprised to see how thirsty the bricks were which drank up all the moisture in my plaster before I had smoothed it, and how many pailfuls of water it takes to christen a new hearth. I had the previous winter made a small quantity of lime by burning the shells of the Unio fluviatilis, which our river affords, for the sake of the experiment; so that I knew where my materials came from. I might have got good limestone within a mile or two and burned it myself, if I had cared to do so.

I didn’t start plastering until it got really cold. I rowed over to the other side of the pond to bring back some cleaner, whiter sand for that purpose, and the boat made it easy to go even farther if I needed to. In the meantime, my house was stripped down to the ground on all sides. While lathing, I was happy to drive each nail home with just one hit of the hammer, and I aimed to transfer the plaster from the board to the wall quickly and neatly. I remembered a story about a cocky guy who used to stroll around the village in fancy clothes, giving advice to workers. One day, he decided to show off by actually doing the work; he rolled up his sleeves, grabbed a plasterer’s board, and loaded his trowel without a hitch. With a smug look towards the lathing above, he made a grand gesture, but immediately got plaster all over his nice clothes, much to his embarrassment. I appreciated again how efficient and practical plastering is, as it effectively keeps out the cold and looks great, and I learned about the various mishaps a plasterer can face. I was surprised at how thirsty the bricks were, soaking up all the moisture in my plaster before I could smooth it out, and how many buckets of water it takes to start a new hearth. The previous winter, I had made a small amount of lime by burning the shells of the Unio fluviatilis from our river just for the experience, so I knew where my materials came from. I could have easily gotten good limestone within a mile or two and burned it myself if I had wanted to.

The pond had in the mean while skimmed over in the shadiest and shallowest coves, some days or even weeks before the general freezing. The first ice is especially interesting and perfect, being hard, dark, and transparent, and affords the best opportunity that ever offers for examining the bottom where it is shallow; for you can lie at your length on ice only an inch thick, like a skater insect on the surface of the water, and study the bottom at your leisure, only two or three inches distant, like a picture behind a glass, and the water is necessarily always smooth then. There are many furrows in the sand where some creature has travelled about and doubled on its tracks; and, for wrecks, it is strewn with the cases of cadis worms made of minute grains of white quartz. Perhaps these have creased it, for you find some of their cases in the furrows, though they are deep and broad for them to make. But the ice itself is the object of most interest, though you must improve the earliest opportunity to study it. If you examine it closely the morning after it freezes, you find that the greater part of the bubbles, which at first appeared to be within it, are against its under surface, and that more are continually rising from the bottom; while the ice is as yet comparatively solid and dark, that is, you see the water through it. These bubbles are from an eightieth to an eighth of an inch in diameter, very clear and beautiful, and you see your face reflected in them through the ice. There may be thirty or forty of them to a square inch. There are also already within the ice narrow oblong perpendicular bubbles about half an inch long, sharp cones with the apex upward; or oftener, if the ice is quite fresh, minute spherical bubbles one directly above another, like a string of beads. But these within the ice are not so numerous nor obvious as those beneath. I sometimes used to cast on stones to try the strength of the ice, and those which broke through carried in air with them, which formed very large and conspicuous white bubbles beneath. One day when I came to the same place forty-eight hours afterward, I found that those large bubbles were still perfect, though an inch more of ice had formed, as I could see distinctly by the seam in the edge of a cake. But as the last two days had been very warm, like an Indian summer, the ice was not now transparent, showing the dark green color of the water, and the bottom, but opaque and whitish or gray, and though twice as thick was hardly stronger than before, for the air bubbles had greatly expanded under this heat and run together, and lost their regularity; they were no longer one directly over another, but often like silvery coins poured from a bag, one overlapping another, or in thin flakes, as if occupying slight cleavages. The beauty of the ice was gone, and it was too late to study the bottom. Being curious to know what position my great bubbles occupied with regard to the new ice, I broke out a cake containing a middling sized one, and turned it bottom upward. The new ice had formed around and under the bubble, so that it was included between the two ices. It was wholly in the lower ice, but close against the upper, and was flattish, or perhaps slightly lenticular, with a rounded edge, a quarter of an inch deep by four inches in diameter; and I was surprised to find that directly under the bubble the ice was melted with great regularity in the form of a saucer reversed, to the height of five eighths of an inch in the middle, leaving a thin partition there between the water and the bubble, hardly an eighth of an inch thick; and in many places the small bubbles in this partition had burst out downward, and probably there was no ice at all under the largest bubbles, which were a foot in diameter. I inferred that the infinite number of minute bubbles which I had first seen against the under surface of the ice were now frozen in likewise, and that each, in its degree, had operated like a burning glass on the ice beneath to melt and rot it. These are the little air-guns which contribute to make the ice crack and whoop.

The pond had meanwhile skimmed over in the shadiest and shallowest spots a few days or even weeks before it completely froze. The first ice is especially fascinating and clear, being hard, dark, and transparent, providing the best chance to examine the bottom where it’s shallow; you can lie flat on ice just an inch thick, like a skating insect on the water surface, and study the bottom up close, just two or three inches away, like a picture behind glass, and the water is always smooth at that time. There are many tracks in the sand where some creature has wandered around and retraced its steps; it’s also scattered with the cases of cadis worms made of tiny grains of white quartz. Perhaps these have made the furrows, as you find some of their cases in the tracks, though they are deep and wide for them to create. But the ice itself is the main focus of interest, and you have to seize the earliest opportunity to observe it. If you take a close look the morning after it freezes, you’ll notice that most of the bubbles that first seemed to be trapped inside are actually against the underside, and more are continuously rising from the bottom; meanwhile, the ice is still relatively solid and dark, letting you see the water through it. These bubbles range from one-eighty to one-eighth of an inch in diameter, very clear and beautiful, and you can see your reflection in them through the ice. There might be thirty or forty of them per square inch. There are also already narrow, elongated bubbles inside the ice, about half an inch long, with sharp cones pointing upward; or more often, if the ice is quite fresh, tiny spherical bubbles stacked one above another, like a string of beads. However, these bubbles embedded in the ice aren’t as numerous or noticeable as those beneath. I sometimes threw stones to check the strength of the ice, and those that broke through brought air with them, creating large, noticeable white bubbles underneath. One day, when I returned to the same spot forty-eight hours later, I found that those large bubbles were still intact, even though an additional inch of ice had formed, as I could clearly see the seam on the edge of a slab. But since the last two days had been very warm, like an Indian summer, the ice was no longer transparent, showing the dark green of the water and the bottom, but opaque and whitish or gray. Even though it was twice as thick, it was hardly stronger than before, because the air bubbles had significantly expanded in the heat and merged together, losing their neat arrangement; they weren’t stacked directly above one another anymore, but often resembled silvery coins poured from a bag, overlapping or in thin flakes, as if they were settling into tiny crevices. The beauty of the ice was gone, and it was too late to examine the bottom. Curious about the position of my larger bubbles relative to the new ice, I broke off a slab containing a medium-sized one and flipped it over. The new ice had formed around and underneath the bubble, trapping it between the two layers of ice. It was fully enclosed in the lower layer but positioned close to the upper one, appearing somewhat flattened, or perhaps slightly lens-shaped, with a rounded edge, a quarter of an inch deep and four inches in diameter. I was surprised to find that directly underneath the bubble, the ice was melted in a regular shape like an upside-down saucer, to a height of five-eighths of an inch in the center, leaving a thin partition between the water and the bubble, hardly an eighth of an inch thick; in many spots, the small bubbles in this partition had burst downwards, and probably there was no ice at all beneath the largest bubbles, which were a foot in diameter. I inferred that the countless tiny bubbles I had originally seen against the underside of the ice were now frozen in as well, and that each, to some extent, had acted like a magnifying glass on the ice below, melting and weakening it. These are the little air-guns that contribute to making the ice crack and pop.

At length the winter set in in good earnest, just as I had finished plastering, and the wind began to howl around the house as if it had not had permission to do so till then. Night after night the geese came lumbering in in the dark with a clangor and a whistling of wings, even after the ground was covered with snow, some to alight in Walden, and some flying low over the woods toward Fair Haven, bound for Mexico. Several times, when returning from the village at ten or eleven o’clock at night, I heard the tread of a flock of geese, or else ducks, on the dry leaves in the woods by a pond-hole behind my dwelling, where they had come up to feed, and the faint honk or quack of their leader as they hurried off. In 1845 Walden froze entirely over for the first time on the night of the 22d of December, Flint’s and other shallower ponds and the river having been frozen ten days or more; in ’46, the 16th; in ’49, about the 31st; and in ’50, about the 27th of December; in ’52, the 5th of January; in ’53, the 31st of December. The snow had already covered the ground since the 25th of November, and surrounded me suddenly with the scenery of winter. I withdrew yet farther into my shell, and endeavored to keep a bright fire both within my house and within my breast. My employment out of doors now was to collect the dead wood in the forest, bringing it in my hands or on my shoulders, or sometimes trailing a dead pine tree under each arm to my shed. An old forest fence which had seen its best days was a great haul for me. I sacrificed it to Vulcan, for it was past serving the god Terminus. How much more interesting an event is that man’s supper who has just been forth in the snow to hunt, nay, you might say, steal, the fuel to cook it with! His bread and meat are sweet. There are enough fagots and waste wood of all kinds in the forests of most of our towns to support many fires, but which at present warm none, and, some think, hinder the growth of the young wood. There was also the drift-wood of the pond. In the course of the summer I had discovered a raft of pitch-pine logs with the bark on, pinned together by the Irish when the railroad was built. This I hauled up partly on the shore. After soaking two years and then lying high six months it was perfectly sound, though waterlogged past drying. I amused myself one winter day with sliding this piecemeal across the pond, nearly half a mile, skating behind with one end of a log fifteen feet long on my shoulder, and the other on the ice; or I tied several logs together with a birch withe, and then, with a longer birch or alder which had a hook at the end, dragged them across. Though completely waterlogged and almost as heavy as lead, they not only burned long, but made a very hot fire; nay, I thought that they burned better for the soaking, as if the pitch, being confined by the water, burned longer, as in a lamp.

Finally, winter settled in for real, just as I finished plastering, and the wind started to howl around the house as if it hadn’t been allowed to do so before. Night after night, the geese came flying in the dark with a racket and the sound of wings, even after the ground was covered with snow—some landing in Walden, and others flying low over the woods toward Fair Haven, headed for Mexico. Several times, on my way back from the village around ten or eleven at night, I heard the sound of a flock of geese, or maybe ducks, on the dry leaves in the woods by a pond behind my house, where they had come to feed, along with the faint honk or quack of their leader as they hurried off. In 1845, Walden froze completely over for the first time on the night of December 22nd, with Flint’s and other shallower ponds and the river already frozen for ten days or more; in ’46, it was the 16th; in ’49, around the 31st; and in ’50, around the 27th of December; in ’52, it was January 5th; and in ’53, December 31st. The snow had covered the ground since November 25th, suddenly surrounding me with winter scenery. I withdrew even further into my shell and tried to keep a bright fire both in my house and in my heart. My outdoor work now was to gather dead wood in the forest, carrying it in my hands or on my shoulders, or sometimes dragging a dead pine tree under each arm to my shed. An old forest fence that had seen better days was a great find for me. I offered it up to Vulcan, as it was no longer useful to the god Terminus. How much more interesting is the meal of a man who has just gone out in the snow to hunt, or you might say, steal, the fuel to cook it! His bread and meat taste sweet. There are enough sticks and waste wood of all kinds in the forests of most of our towns to fuel many fires, but which at the moment warm none, and some believe, hinder the growth of young trees. There was also the driftwood from the pond. During the summer, I found a raft of pitch-pine logs with the bark still on, pinned together by the Irish when the railroad was built. I pulled some of it up onto the shore. After soaking for two years and then sitting high for six months, it was completely sound, although it was waterlogged and wouldn’t dry out. I had fun one winter day sliding this piecemeal across the pond, nearly half a mile, skating behind with one end of a fifteen-foot log on my shoulder and the other on the ice; or I tied several logs together with a birch branch, and then, with a longer birch or alder that had a hook at the end, dragged them across. Though completely waterlogged and almost as heavy as lead, they not only burned for a long time but made a very hot fire; in fact, I thought they burned better for being soaked, as if the pitch, confined by the water, burned longer, like in a lamp.

Gilpin, in his account of the forest borderers of England, says that “the encroachments of trespassers, and the houses and fences thus raised on the borders of the forest,” were “considered as great nuisances by the old forest law, and were severely punished under the name of purprestures, as tending ad terrorem ferarum—ad nocumentum forestæ, &c.,” to the frightening of the game and the detriment of the forest. But I was interested in the preservation of the venison and the vert more than the hunters or woodchoppers, and as much as though I had been the Lord Warden himself; and if any part was burned, though I burned it myself by accident, I grieved with a grief that lasted longer and was more inconsolable than that of the proprietors; nay, I grieved when it was cut down by the proprietors themselves. I would that our farmers when they cut down a forest felt some of that awe which the old Romans did when they came to thin, or let in the light to, a consecrated grove (lucum conlucare), that is, would believe that it is sacred to some god. The Roman made an expiatory offering, and prayed, Whatever god or goddess thou art to whom this grove is sacred, be propitious to me, my family, and children, &c.

Gilpin, in his account of the forest dwellers of England, notes that “the encroachments of trespassers, and the houses and fences built along the borders of the forest,” were “viewed as significant nuisances by the old forest law, and were heavily penalized under the name of purprestures, as they posed ad terrorem ferarum—ad nocumentum forestæ, etc.,” creating fear among the wildlife and harming the forest. However, I cared more about preserving the game and the trees than the hunters or woodcutters, as if I were the Lord Warden himself; and if any part was burned, even if I accidentally caused it, I felt a sorrow that lasted longer and was deeper than that of the owners; indeed, I felt sad when it was cut down by the owners themselves. I wish our farmers would feel some of that reverence when they cut down a forest, similar to what the ancient Romans felt when they would thin or let in light to a sacred grove (lucum conlucare), believing it was sacred to some deity. The Roman made an offering to atone and prayed, Whatever god or goddess you are to whom this grove is sacred, be favorable to me, my family, and children, etc.

It is remarkable what a value is still put upon wood even in this age and in this new country, a value more permanent and universal than that of gold. After all our discoveries and inventions no man will go by a pile of wood. It is as precious to us as it was to our Saxon and Norman ancestors. If they made their bows of it, we make our gun-stocks of it. Michaux, more than thirty years ago, says that the price of wood for fuel in New York and Philadelphia “nearly equals, and sometimes exceeds, that of the best wood in Paris, though this immense capital annually requires more than three hundred thousand cords, and is surrounded to the distance of three hundred miles by cultivated plains.” In this town the price of wood rises almost steadily, and the only question is, how much higher it is to be this year than it was the last. Mechanics and tradesmen who come in person to the forest on no other errand, are sure to attend the wood auction, and even pay a high price for the privilege of gleaning after the woodchopper. It is now many years that men have resorted to the forest for fuel and the materials of the arts; the New Englander and the New Hollander, the Parisian and the Celt, the farmer and Robinhood, Goody Blake and Harry Gill, in most parts of the world the prince and the peasant, the scholar and the savage, equally require still a few sticks from the forest to warm them and cook their food. Neither could I do without them.

It's amazing how much value we still place on wood, even in this era and in this new country, a value that's more lasting and universal than gold. Despite all our discoveries and inventions, no one can ignore a pile of wood. It's as valuable to us as it was to our Saxon and Norman ancestors. They made their bows from it, and we make our gun stocks from it. Over thirty years ago, Michaux noted that the price of wood for fuel in New York and Philadelphia “nearly equals, and sometimes exceeds, that of the best wood in Paris, even though this huge city annually needs more than three hundred thousand cords and is surrounded for three hundred miles by cultivated land.” In this town, the price of wood consistently increases, and the only question is how much higher it will be this year compared to last. Mechanics and tradespeople who come to the forest specifically for this reason always make sure to attend the wood auction, often paying a high price for the chance to gather scraps left behind by the woodchopper. For many years, people have turned to the forest for fuel and materials for their crafts; New Englanders and Dutch settlers, Parisians and Celts, farmers, Robin Hood, Goody Blake, and Harry Gill—all over the world, both nobles and peasants, scholars and the marginalized still need a few sticks from the forest to keep warm and cook their meals. I couldn't do without them either.

Every man looks at his wood-pile with a kind of affection. I love to have mine before my window, and the more chips the better to remind me of my pleasing work. I had an old axe which nobody claimed, with which by spells in winter days, on the sunny side of the house, I played about the stumps which I had got out of my bean-field. As my driver prophesied when I was ploughing, they warmed me twice, once while I was splitting them, and again when they were on the fire, so that no fuel could give out more heat. As for the axe, I was advised to get the village blacksmith to “jump” it; but I jumped him, and, putting a hickory helve from the woods into it, made it do. If it was dull, it was at least hung true.

Every guy looks at his woodpile with a certain fondness. I love having mine right outside my window, and the more chips, the better—it reminds me of my satisfying work. I had an old axe that no one claimed, and on sunny winter days, I used to mess around with the stumps I had pulled out of my bean field. As my driver predicted while I was plowing, they warmed me twice: once while I was splitting them and again when they were on the fire, so no fuel could give off more heat. As for the axe, I was told to get the village blacksmith to “fix” it; instead, I fixed it myself, and by adding a hickory handle from the woods, I made it work. It might have been dull, but at least it was balanced right.

A few pieces of fat pine were a great treasure. It is interesting to remember how much of this food for fire is still concealed in the bowels of the earth. In previous years I had often gone “prospecting” over some bare hill-side, where a pitch-pine wood had formerly stood, and got out the fat pine roots. They are almost indestructible. Stumps thirty or forty years old, at least, will still be sound at the core, though the sapwood has all become vegetable mould, as appears by the scales of the thick bark forming a ring level with the earth four or five inches distant from the heart. With axe and shovel you explore this mine, and follow the marrowy store, yellow as beef tallow, or as if you had struck on a vein of gold, deep into the earth. But commonly I kindled my fire with the dry leaves of the forest, which I had stored up in my shed before the snow came. Green hickory finely split makes the woodchopper’s kindlings, when he has a camp in the woods. Once in a while I got a little of this. When the villagers were lighting their fires beyond the horizon, I too gave notice to the various wild inhabitants of Walden vale, by a smoky streamer from my chimney, that I was awake.—

A few chunks of fat pine were a real treasure. It's interesting to think about how much of this firewood is still hidden deep in the earth. In past years, I often went "prospecting" on some bare hillside where a pitch-pine forest used to be and dug up the fat pine roots. They’re almost indestructible. Stumps that are thirty or forty years old, at least, will still be solid in the middle, even though the outer wood has turned into compost, as seen by the rings of thick bark that sit four or five inches away from the center. With an axe and a shovel, you dig into this treasure and follow the fatty wood, which is as yellow as beef tallow, or as if you’d found a gold vein, deep underground. But usually, I lit my fire with dry leaves from the forest that I had collected in my shed before the snow arrived. Finely split green hickory makes great kindling for a woodsman when he has a camp in the forest. Occasionally, I managed to get some of that. When the villagers were lighting their fires in the distance, I also let the various wild creatures of Walden Vale know I was awake by sending up a smoky plume from my chimney.

Light-winged Smoke, Icarian bird,
Melting thy pinions in thy upward flight,
Lark without song, and messenger of dawn,
Circling above the hamlets as thy nest;
Or else, departing dream, and shadowy form
Of midnight vision, gathering up thy skirts;
By night star-veiling, and by day
Darkening the light and blotting out the sun;
Go thou my incense upward from this hearth,
And ask the gods to pardon this clear flame.

Light-winged Smoke, Icarian bird,
Melting your wings as you fly up,
Lark without a song, and messenger of dawn,
Circling above the villages as your nest;
Or else, departing dream, and shadowy figure
Of midnight visions, gathering up your skirts;
By night star-covering, and by day
Darkening the light and blocking out the sun;
Send my incense upward from this hearth,
And ask the gods to forgive this bright flame.

Hard green wood just cut, though I used but little of that, answered my purpose better than any other. I sometimes left a good fire when I went to take a walk in a winter afternoon; and when I returned, three or four hours afterward, it would be still alive and glowing. My house was not empty though I was gone. It was as if I had left a cheerful housekeeper behind. It was I and Fire that lived there; and commonly my housekeeper proved trustworthy. One day, however, as I was splitting wood, I thought that I would just look in at the window and see if the house was not on fire; it was the only time I remember to have been particularly anxious on this score; so I looked and saw that a spark had caught my bed, and I went in and extinguished it when it had burned a place as big as my hand. But my house occupied so sunny and sheltered a position, and its roof was so low, that I could afford to let the fire go out in the middle of almost any winter day.

Freshly cut green wood, although I used only a little of it, worked better for me than anything else. Sometimes I would leave a nice fire going when I went for a walk on a winter afternoon; when I came back three or four hours later, it would still be alive and glowing. My house wasn't empty while I was away. It felt like I had left a cheerful housekeeper behind. It was just me and the Fire living there, and usually, my housekeeper was reliable. One day, while I was splitting wood, I thought I’d check through the window to see if the house was on fire; it was the only time I remember being particularly worried about that. I looked in and saw that a spark had caught my bed, so I went in and put it out when it had burned a spot about the size of my hand. But my house was in such a sunny and sheltered spot, and its roof was so low, that I could let the fire go out in the middle of almost any winter day.

The moles nested in my cellar, nibbling every third potato, and making a snug bed even there of some hair left after plastering and of brown paper; for even the wildest animals love comfort and warmth as well as man, and they survive the winter only because they are so careful to secure them. Some of my friends spoke as if I was coming to the woods on purpose to freeze myself. The animal merely makes a bed, which he warms with his body, in a sheltered place; but man, having discovered fire, boxes up some air in a spacious apartment, and warms that, instead of robbing himself, makes that his bed, in which he can move about divested of more cumbrous clothing, maintain a kind of summer in the midst of winter, and by means of windows even admit the light, and with a lamp lengthen out the day. Thus he goes a step or two beyond instinct, and saves a little time for the fine arts. Though, when I had been exposed to the rudest blasts a long time, my whole body began to grow torpid, when I reached the genial atmosphere of my house I soon recovered my faculties and prolonged my life. But the most luxuriously housed has little to boast of in this respect, nor need we trouble ourselves to speculate how the human race may be at last destroyed. It would be easy to cut their threads any time with a little sharper blast from the north. We go on dating from Cold Fridays and Great Snows; but a little colder Friday, or greater snow, would put a period to man’s existence on the globe.

The moles took up residence in my cellar, munching on every third potato and making a cozy nest out of some leftover hair from the plastering and brown paper. Even the wildest animals crave comfort and warmth just like humans do, and they endure the winter because they’re careful to find it. Some of my friends acted like I was going to the woods just to freeze. Animals simply create a bed in a sheltered spot and warm it with their bodies. In contrast, humans, having discovered fire, heat up some air in a spacious room instead of limiting themselves, create a bed where they can move around without heavy clothing, maintain a sort of summer in the midst of winter, let in light through windows, and use lamps to extend the day. This allows us to go a bit beyond instinct and carve out some time for the arts. However, after being exposed to the harshest cold for a long time, I felt my whole body growing numb. Once I got into the warm atmosphere of my house, I quickly regained my senses and extended my life. Yet, even those living in the most luxurious homes have little to brag about in this regard. We don’t need to worry about how humanity might eventually be wiped out. It wouldn’t take much—a stronger blast from the north could cut our lives short any time. We mark time by Cold Fridays and Great Snows, but an even colder Friday or a heavier snowfall could end humanity’s existence on Earth.

The next winter I used a small cooking-stove for economy, since I did not own the forest; but it did not keep fire so well as the open fire-place. Cooking was then, for the most part, no longer a poetic, but merely a chemic process. It will soon be forgotten, in these days of stoves, that we used to roast potatoes in the ashes, after the Indian fashion. The stove not only took up room and scented the house, but it concealed the fire, and I felt as if I had lost a companion. You can always see a face in the fire. The laborer, looking into it at evening, purifies his thoughts of the dross and earthiness which they have accumulated during the day. But I could no longer sit and look into the fire, and the pertinent words of a poet recurred to me with new force.—

The next winter, I used a small cooking stove to save money since I didn’t own the forest, but it didn’t hold the fire as well as the open fireplace. Cooking had mostly become less of an art and more of a chemical process. Soon, we’ll forget that we used to roast potatoes in the ashes like the Native Americans did. The stove not only took up space and made the house smell, but it also hid the fire, and I felt like I had lost a friend. You can always see a face in the fire. The worker, looking into it in the evening, cleanses his thoughts of the clutter and heaviness they’ve gathered throughout the day. But I could no longer sit and gaze into the fire, and the poignant words of a poet came back to me with new meaning.

“Never, bright flame, may be denied to me
Thy dear, life imaging, close sympathy.
What but my hopes shot upward e’er so bright?
What but my fortunes sunk so low in night?

Why art thou banished from our hearth and hall,
Thou who art welcomed and beloved by all?
Was thy existence then too fanciful
For our life’s common light, who are so dull?
Did thy bright gleam mysterious converse hold
With our congenial souls? secrets too bold?
Well, we are safe and strong, for now we sit
Beside a hearth where no dim shadows flit,
Where nothing cheers nor saddens, but a fire
Warms feet and hands—nor does to more aspire;
By whose compact utilitarian heap
The present may sit down and go to sleep,
Nor fear the ghosts who from the dim past walked,
And with us by the unequal light of the old wood fire talked.”

“Never, bright flame, will you be denied to me
Your dear, life-giving, close sympathy.
What else but my hopes shot up so bright?
What else but my fortunes sunk so low in night?

Why are you banished from our hearth and hall,
You who are welcomed and loved by all?
Was your existence then too fanciful
For our life’s dull common light, who are so simple?
Did your bright gleam hold mysterious talks
With our kindred souls? Secrets too bold?
Well, we are safe and strong, for now we sit
Beside a hearth where no dim shadows flit,
Where nothing cheers or saddens, but a fire
Warms feet and hands—nor does it aspire to more;
By whose practical, utilitarian heap
The present can sit down and go to sleep,
Nor fear the ghosts who walked from the dim past,
And with us by the uneven light of the old wood fire talked.”

Former Inhabitants and Winter Visitors

I weathered some merry snow storms, and spent some cheerful winter evenings by my fire-side, while the snow whirled wildly without, and even the hooting of the owl was hushed. For many weeks I met no one in my walks but those who came occasionally to cut wood and sled it to the village. The elements, however, abetted me in making a path through the deepest snow in the woods, for when I had once gone through the wind blew the oak leaves into my tracks, where they lodged, and by absorbing the rays of the sun melted the snow, and so not only made a dry bed for my feet, but in the night their dark line was my guide. For human society I was obliged to conjure up the former occupants of these woods. Within the memory of many of my townsmen the road near which my house stands resounded with the laugh and gossip of inhabitants, and the woods which border it were notched and dotted here and there with their little gardens and dwellings, though it was then much more shut in by the forest than now. In some places, within my own remembrance, the pines would scrape both sides of a chaise at once, and women and children who were compelled to go this way to Lincoln alone and on foot did it with fear, and often ran a good part of the distance. Though mainly but a humble route to neighboring villages, or for the woodman’s team, it once amused the traveller more than now by its variety, and lingered longer in his memory. Where now firm open fields stretch from the village to the woods, it then ran through a maple swamp on a foundation of logs, the remnants of which, doubtless, still underlie the present dusty highway, from the Stratton, now the Alms House, Farm, to Brister’s Hill.

I braved some cheerful snowstorms and spent some cozy winter evenings by my fireplace while the snow swirled wildly outside, and even the hooting of the owl was quiet. For many weeks, I encountered no one on my walks except for those who occasionally came to cut wood and sled it to the village. The weather helped me carve a path through the deepest snow in the woods because once I had walked through, the wind blew oak leaves into my tracks, where they settled and absorbed the sun’s rays, melting the snow. This not only created a dry path for my feet but also, at night, their dark line served as my guide. For human interaction, I had to imagine the former occupants of these woods. Within the memory of many of my townspeople, the road where my house stands echoed with laughter and chatter from residents, and the woods surrounding it were marked with their little gardens and homes, although it was much more enclosed by forest back then. In some places, within my own memory, the pines would scrape both sides of a carriage at once, and women and children who had to walk this way to Lincoln did so with fear, often running part of the way. Though it was mainly just a humble route to nearby villages or for the woodcutter's team, it once intrigued travelers more than it does now with its variety and stayed longer in their memories. Where open fields now stretch from the village to the woods, it used to pass through a maple swamp on a base of logs, the remnants of which still likely lie beneath the current dusty highway, from Stratton, now the Alms House, Farm, to Brister’s Hill.

East of my bean-field, across the road, lived Cato Ingraham, slave of Duncan Ingraham, Esquire, gentleman, of Concord village, who built his slave a house, and gave him permission to live in Walden Woods;—Cato, not Uticensis, but Concordiensis. Some say that he was a Guinea Negro. There are a few who remember his little patch among the walnuts, which he let grow up till he should be old and need them; but a younger and whiter speculator got them at last. He too, however, occupies an equally narrow house at present. Cato’s half-obliterated cellar hole still remains, though known to few, being concealed from the traveller by a fringe of pines. It is now filled with the smooth sumach (Rhus glabra,) and one of the earliest species of golden-rod (Solidago stricta) grows there luxuriantly.

East of my bean field, across the road, lived Cato Ingraham, a slave of Duncan Ingraham, Esquire, a gentleman from Concord village, who built a house for his slave and allowed him to stay in Walden Woods;—Cato, not Uticensis, but Concordiensis. Some say he was a Guinea Negro. A few people remember his small plot among the walnuts, which he let grow until he got old and needed them; but a younger, whiter speculator eventually took them. He too, however, lives in a similarly small house now. Cato’s half-hidden cellar hole still exists, though few know about it, as it's concealed from travelers by a fringe of pines. It’s now filled with smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), and one of the earliest types of goldenrod (Solidago stricta) grows there abundantly.

Here, by the very corner of my field, still nearer to town, Zilpha, a colored woman, had her little house, where she spun linen for the townsfolk, making the Walden Woods ring with her shrill singing, for she had a loud and notable voice. At length, in the war of 1812, her dwelling was set on fire by English soldiers, prisoners on parole, when she was away, and her cat and dog and hens were all burned up together. She led a hard life, and somewhat inhumane. One old frequenter of these woods remembers, that as he passed her house one noon he heard her muttering to herself over her gurgling pot,—“Ye are all bones, bones!” I have seen bricks amid the oak copse there.

Here, at the very edge of my field, even closer to town, Zilpha, a Black woman, had her small house, where she spun linen for the townspeople, making the Walden Woods echo with her sharp singing, since she had a loud and distinctive voice. Eventually, during the War of 1812, her home was set on fire by English soldiers, who were prisoners on parole, while she was away, and her cat, dog, and hens all perished in the flames. She lived a tough life, and it was somewhat cruel. One old regular of these woods remembers that as he walked by her house one noon, he heard her mumbling to herself over her bubbling pot—“You are all bones, bones!” I have seen bricks scattered among the oak grove there.

Down the road, on the right hand, on Brister’s Hill, lived Brister Freeman, “a handy Negro,” slave of Squire Cummings once,—there where grow still the apple-trees which Brister planted and tended; large old trees now, but their fruit still wild and ciderish to my taste. Not long since I read his epitaph in the old Lincoln burying-ground, a little on one side, near the unmarked graves of some British grenadiers who fell in the retreat from Concord,—where he is styled “Sippio Brister,”—Scipio Africanus he had some title to be called,—“a man of color,” as if he were discolored. It also told me, with staring emphasis, when he died; which was but an indirect way of informing me that he ever lived. With him dwelt Fenda, his hospitable wife, who told fortunes, yet pleasantly,—large, round, and black, blacker than any of the children of night, such a dusky orb as never rose on Concord before or since.

Down the road, on the right side, on Brister’s Hill, lived Brister Freeman, “a handy Black man,” once a slave of Squire Cummings—where the apple trees he planted and took care of still grow. They’re big old trees now, but their fruit still tastes wild and cider-like to me. Not long ago, I read his epitaph in the old Lincoln cemetery, a bit off to the side, near the unmarked graves of some British grenadiers who fell during the retreat from Concord—where he’s referred to as “Sippio Brister”—he had some reason to be called Scipio Africanus—“a man of color,” as if he were discolored. It also clearly stated when he died; which served as an indirect way of telling me that he once lived. He lived with Fenda, his welcoming wife, who read fortunes in a nice way—large, round, and dark, darker than any of the children of night, a dusky figure like no other that ever appeared in Concord before or since.

Farther down the hill, on the left, on the old road in the woods, are marks of some homestead of the Stratton family; whose orchard once covered all the slope of Brister’s Hill, but was long since killed out by pitch pines, excepting a few stumps, whose old roots furnish still the wild stocks of many a thrifty village tree.

Farther down the hill, on the left, on the old road in the woods, are remnants of a homestead belonging to the Stratton family; their orchard once filled the entire slope of Brister’s Hill, but it was long ago choked out by pitch pines, leaving only a few stumps, whose old roots still provide the wild stocks for many a healthy village tree.

Nearer yet to town, you come to Breed’s location, on the other side of the way, just on the edge of the wood; ground famous for the pranks of a demon not distinctly named in old mythology, who has acted a prominent and astounding part in our New England life, and deserves, as much as any mythological character, to have his biography written one day; who first comes in the guise of a friend or hired man, and then robs and murders the whole family,—New-England Rum. But history must not yet tell the tragedies enacted here; let time intervene in some measure to assuage and lend an azure tint to them. Here the most indistinct and dubious tradition says that once a tavern stood; the well the same, which tempered the traveller’s beverage and refreshed his steed. Here then men saluted one another, and heard and told the news, and went their ways again.

Closer to town, you arrive at Breed’s location, on the other side of the road, right at the edge of the woods; this ground is known for the tricks of a demon not clearly identified in ancient mythology, who has played a significant and remarkable role in our New England life, and deserves, like any mythological figure, to have his story told one day; he first appears as a friend or hired hand, and then robs and kills the whole family—New England Rum. But history shouldn’t yet recount the tragedies that have happened here; let some time pass to soften and add a bit of color to them. Here, the most vague and uncertain tradition claims that a tavern once existed; the same well that quenched the traveler’s thirst and refreshed his horse. Here, people greeted one another, shared the news, and went on their way again.

Breed’s hut was standing only a dozen years ago, though it had long been unoccupied. It was about the size of mine. It was set on fire by mischievous boys, one Election night, if I do not mistake. I lived on the edge of the village then, and had just lost myself over Davenant’s Gondibert, that winter that I labored with a lethargy,—which, by the way, I never knew whether to regard as a family complaint, having an uncle who goes to sleep shaving himself, and is obliged to sprout potatoes in a cellar Sundays, in order to keep awake and keep the Sabbath, or as the consequence of my attempt to read Chalmers’ collection of English poetry without skipping. It fairly overcame my Nervii. I had just sunk my head on this when the bells rung fire, and in hot haste the engines rolled that way, led by a straggling troop of men and boys, and I among the foremost, for I had leaped the brook. We thought it was far south over the woods,—we who had run to fires before,—barn, shop, or dwelling-house, or all together. “It’s Baker’s barn,” cried one. “It is the Codman place,” affirmed another. And then fresh sparks went up above the wood, as if the roof fell in, and we all shouted “Concord to the rescue!” Wagons shot past with furious speed and crushing loads, bearing, perchance, among the rest, the agent of the Insurance Company, who was bound to go however far; and ever and anon the engine bell tinkled behind, more slow and sure; and rearmost of all, as it was afterward whispered, came they who set the fire and gave the alarm. Thus we kept on like true idealists, rejecting the evidence of our senses, until at a turn in the road we heard the crackling and actually felt the heat of the fire from over the wall, and realized, alas! that we were there. The very nearness of the fire but cooled our ardor. At first we thought to throw a frog-pond on to it; but concluded to let it burn, it was so far gone and so worthless. So we stood round our engine, jostled one another, expressed our sentiments through speaking-trumpets, or in lower tone referred to the great conflagrations which the world has witnessed, including Bascom’s shop, and, between ourselves, we thought that, were we there in season with our “tub,” and a full frog-pond by, we could turn that threatened last and universal one into another flood. We finally retreated without doing any mischief,—returned to sleep and Gondibert. But as for Gondibert, I would except that passage in the preface about wit being the soul’s powder,—“but most of mankind are strangers to wit, as Indians are to powder.”

Breed’s hut stood only about twelve years ago, but it had been empty for a while. It was roughly the same size as mine. A bunch of mischievous boys set it on fire one Election night, if I’m remembering correctly. I was living on the edge of the village then, and I had just gotten lost in Davenant’s Gondibert during that winter when I felt so lethargic—though I could never tell if it was a family issue, since I have an uncle who falls asleep while shaving and has to grow potatoes in a cellar on Sundays to stay awake and keep the Sabbath, or if it was because I was trying to read Chalmers’ collection of English poetry without skipping anything. It really drained my energy. I had just leaned my head back when the bells rang out for a fire, and in a rush, the fire engines rolled that way, followed by a chaotic group of men and boys, with me near the front because I’d jumped across the creek. We thought it was far to the south over the woods—we who had run to fires before—whether it was a barn, shop, house, or all of them together. “It’s Baker’s barn,” shouted one. “It’s the Codman place,” another asserted. Then fresh sparks shot up above the trees, as if the roof had collapsed, and we all yelled, “Concord to the rescue!” Wagons sped past with furious urgency and heavy loads, possibly including the Insurance Company’s agent, who had to go as far as necessary; and now and then the engine bell rang in the background, slower but steady; and last of all, as we later heard, came those who had started the fire and raised the alarm. We kept going like true idealists, ignoring the evidence of our senses, until we turned a corner on the road and heard the crackling and actually felt the heat of the fire over the wall, and realized, sadly, that we were there. The very closeness of the fire cooled our enthusiasm. At first, we thought about throwing a frog pond on it; but we decided to just let it burn since it was so far gone and so useless. So we surrounded our engine, bumping into each other, shared our thoughts through megaphones, or more quietly talked about the great fires the world has seen, including Bascom’s shop, and among ourselves, we thought that if we had been there in time with our “tub” and a full frog pond, we could have turned that impending final and massive fire into another flood. We eventually backed off without causing any trouble—returned to sleep and Gondibert. But as for Gondibert, I would make an exception for that part in the preface about wit being the soul's powder—“but most of mankind are strangers to wit, just like Indians are to powder.”

It chanced that I walked that way across the fields the following night, about the same hour, and hearing a low moaning at this spot, I drew near in the dark, and discovered the only survivor of the family that I know, the heir of both its virtues and its vices, who alone was interested in this burning, lying on his stomach and looking over the cellar wall at the still smouldering cinders beneath, muttering to himself, as is his wont. He had been working far off in the river meadows all day, and had improved the first moments that he could call his own to visit the home of his fathers and his youth. He gazed into the cellar from all sides and points of view by turns, always lying down to it, as if there was some treasure, which he remembered, concealed between the stones, where there was absolutely nothing but a heap of bricks and ashes. The house being gone, he looked at what there was left. He was soothed by the sympathy which my mere presence implied, and showed me, as well as the darkness permitted, where the well was covered up; which, thank Heaven, could never be burned; and he groped long about the wall to find the well-sweep which his father had cut and mounted, feeling for the iron hook or staple by which a burden had been fastened to the heavy end,—all that he could now cling to,—to convince me that it was no common “rider.” I felt it, and still remark it almost daily in my walks, for by it hangs the history of a family.

It happened that I walked that way across the fields the next night, around the same time, and hearing a soft moaning in this spot, I got closer in the dark. I found the only survivor of the family I know, the heir of both its strengths and weaknesses, who was the only one interested in this fire, lying on his stomach and looking over the cellar wall at the still smoldering ashes below, mumbling to himself, as he often did. He had been working far away in the river meadows all day and had taken the first moments he could call his own to visit his childhood home. He looked into the cellar from every angle, always lying down to get a better view, as if there was some treasure he remembered hidden among the stones, where there was nothing but a pile of bricks and ashes. With the house gone, he examined what was left. He found comfort in the sympathy that my mere presence suggested and showed me, as well as the darkness allowed, where the well was covered up; thankfully, it could never be burned. He felt around the wall for the well-sweep that his father had cut and mounted, searching for the iron hook or staple that was used to attach a load to the heavy end—all he had left to hold onto—to prove to me that it was no ordinary “rider.” I touched it and still notice it almost daily on my walks, for it carries the history of a family.

Once more, on the left, where are seen the well and lilac bushes by the wall, in the now open field, lived Nutting and Le Grosse. But to return toward Lincoln.

Once again, on the left, where the well and lilac bushes can be seen by the wall, in the now open field, lived Nutting and Le Grosse. But let's head back toward Lincoln.

Farther in the woods than any of these, where the road approaches nearest to the pond, Wyman the potter squatted, and furnished his townsmen with earthen ware, and left descendants to succeed him. Neither were they rich in worldly goods, holding the land by sufferance while they lived; and there often the sheriff came in vain to collect the taxes, and “attached a chip,” for form’s sake, as I have read in his accounts, there being nothing else that he could lay his hands on. One day in midsummer, when I was hoeing, a man who was carrying a load of pottery to market stopped his horse against my field and inquired concerning Wyman the younger. He had long ago bought a potter’s wheel of him, and wished to know what had become of him. I had read of the potter’s clay and wheel in Scripture, but it had never occurred to me that the pots we use were not such as had come down unbroken from those days, or grown on trees like gourds somewhere, and I was pleased to hear that so fictile an art was ever practiced in my neighborhood.

Further in the woods than any of these, where the road gets closest to the pond, Wyman the potter sat down and supplied his townspeople with pottery, leaving behind descendants to carry on his legacy. They weren’t wealthy in material possessions, merely occupying the land as long as they lived there; the sheriff often came there in vain to collect taxes and “attached a chip” just for appearance, as I’ve read in his accounts, since there was nothing else he could seize. One day in midsummer, while I was hoeing, a man carrying a load of pottery to market stopped his horse by my field and asked about Wyman the younger. He had bought a potter’s wheel from him a long time ago and wanted to know what had happened to him. I had read about the potter’s clay and wheel in the Bible, but I had never considered that the pots we use didn’t come down unbroken from those days or grow on trees like gourds, so I was glad to learn that such a craft was still being practiced in my area.

The last inhabitant of these woods before me was an Irishman, Hugh Quoil (if I have spelt his name with coil enough,) who occupied Wyman’s tenement,—Col. Quoil, he was called. Rumor said that he had been a soldier at Waterloo. If he had lived I should have made him fight his battles over again. His trade here was that of a ditcher. Napoleon went to St. Helena; Quoil came to Walden Woods. All I know of him is tragic. He was a man of manners, like one who had seen the world, and was capable of more civil speech than you could well attend to. He wore a great coat in mid-summer, being affected with the trembling delirium, and his face was the color of carmine. He died in the road at the foot of Brister’s Hill shortly after I came to the woods, so that I have not remembered him as a neighbor. Before his house was pulled down, when his comrades avoided it as “an unlucky castle,” I visited it. There lay his old clothes curled up by use, as if they were himself, upon his raised plank bed. His pipe lay broken on the hearth, instead of a bowl broken at the fountain. The last could never have been the symbol of his death, for he confessed to me that, though he had heard of Brister’s Spring, he had never seen it; and soiled cards, kings of diamonds spades and hearts, were scattered over the floor. One black chicken which the administrator could not catch, black as night and as silent, not even croaking, awaiting Reynard, still went to roost in the next apartment. In the rear there was the dim outline of a garden, which had been planted but had never received its first hoeing, owing to those terrible shaking fits, though it was now harvest time. It was over-run with Roman wormwood and beggar-ticks, which last stuck to my clothes for all fruit. The skin of a woodchuck was freshly stretched upon the back of the house, a trophy of his last Waterloo; but no warm cap or mittens would he want more.

The last person to live in these woods before me was an Irishman named Hugh Quoil (if I’ve spelled his name right), who lived in Wyman’s place—he was known as Col. Quoil. Rumor had it that he was a soldier at Waterloo. If he’d lived, I would have made him relive his battles. His job here was as a ditch digger. Napoleon ended up on St. Helena; Quoil ended up in Walden Woods. All I know about him is sad. He was well-mannered, like someone who had seen the world, and he was capable of more polite conversation than you could easily handle. He wore a long coat even in mid-summer because he suffered from severe trembling fits, and his face was bright red. He died on the road at the foot of Brister’s Hill shortly after I arrived in the woods, so I don’t really remember him as a neighbor. Before his house was torn down, when his friends avoided it, calling it “an unlucky castle,” I went to check it out. His old clothes were rumpled on his raised plank bed, as if they were part of him. His broken pipe lay on the hearth, instead of a bowl broken at a fountain. The pipe couldn’t represent his death because he told me he’d heard of Brister’s Spring but had never seen it; instead, dirty playing cards, kings of diamonds, spades, and hearts, were scattered across the floor. There was one black chicken that the administrator couldn’t catch, black as night and silent, not making a sound, waiting for the fox, still going to roost in the next room. In the back, there was the faint outline of a garden that had been planted but never properly cared for because of those terrible shaking fits, even though it was harvest time. It was overgrown with Roman wormwood and beggar-ticks, which stuck to my clothes instead of any fruit. The skin of a woodchuck was freshly stretched on the back of the house, a trophy from his last Waterloo; but he didn’t need any warm cap or mittens anymore.

Now only a dent in the earth marks the site of these dwellings, with buried cellar stones, and strawberries, raspberries, thimble-berries, hazel-bushes, and sumachs growing in the sunny sward there; some pitch-pine or gnarled oak occupies what was the chimney nook, and a sweet-scented black-birch, perhaps, waves where the door-stone was. Sometimes the well dent is visible, where once a spring oozed; now dry and tearless grass; or it was covered deep,—not to be discovered till some late day,—with a flat stone under the sod, when the last of the race departed. What a sorrowful act must that be,—the covering up of wells! coincident with the opening of wells of tears. These cellar dents, like deserted fox burrows, old holes, are all that is left where once were the stir and bustle of human life, and “fate, free-will, foreknowledge absolute,” in some form and dialect or other were by turns discussed. But all I can learn of their conclusions amounts to just this, that “Cato and Brister pulled wool;” which is about as edifying as the history of more famous schools of philosophy.

Now there’s just a dent in the ground where these homes used to be, with buried cellar stones and strawberries, raspberries, thimble-berries, hazel bushes, and sumacs growing in the sunny grass; some pitch pine or twisted oak occupies what used to be the chimney corner, and a sweet-smelling black birch maybe sways where the doorstep was. Sometimes you can still see the well indentation, where a spring once flowed; now it’s just dry, tearless grass, or it was covered deep—hidden until some later day—with a flat stone under the soil, when the last of the people left. What a sad thing that must be—the covering up of wells!—alongside the opening of wells of tears. These cellar depressions, like abandoned fox dens, are all that's left where there once was the noise and activity of human life, and “fate, free will, absolute foreknowledge,” in some form or another was debated. But all I can gather about their conclusions boils down to this: “Cato and Brister pulled wool,” which is about as enlightening as the histories of more renowned schools of thought.

Still grows the vivacious lilac a generation after the door and lintel and the sill are gone, unfolding its sweet-scented flowers each spring, to be plucked by the musing traveller; planted and tended once by children’s hands, in front-yard plots,—now standing by wall-sides in retired pastures, and giving place to new-rising forests;—the last of that stirp, sole survivor of that family. Little did the dusky children think that the puny slip with its two eyes only, which they stuck in the ground in the shadow of the house and daily watered, would root itself so, and outlive them, and house itself in the rear that shaded it, and grown man’s garden and orchard, and tell their story faintly to the lone wanderer a half century after they had grown up and died,—blossoming as fair, and smelling as sweet, as in that first spring. I mark its still tender, civil, cheerful, lilac colors.

Still thrives the vibrant lilac a generation after the door, lintel, and sill have disappeared, opening its sweet-scented flowers every spring, ready to be picked by the thoughtful traveler; once planted and cared for by children's hands, in front-yard gardens,—now standing beside walls in quiet pastures, giving way to new-growing forests;—the last of that lineage, the sole survivor of that family. Little did those dusky children realize that the tiny cutting with only two buds, which they planted in the shadow of the house and watered daily, would take root like this, outlive them, settle in the rear that shaded it, and grow into a man's garden and orchard, telling their story softly to the solitary wanderer half a century after they had grown up and passed away,—blooming as beautifully and smelling as sweetly as in that first spring. I note its still tender, gentle, cheerful lilac colors.

But this small village, germ of something more, why did it fail while Concord keeps its ground? Were there no natural advantages,—no water privileges, forsooth? Ay, the deep Walden Pond and cool Brister’s Spring,—privilege to drink long and healthy draughts at these, all unimproved by these men but to dilute their glass. They were universally a thirsty race. Might not the basket, stable-broom, mat-making, corn-parching, linen-spinning, and pottery business have thrived here, making the wilderness to blossom like the rose, and a numerous posterity have inherited the land of their fathers? The sterile soil would at least have been proof against a low-land degeneracy. Alas! how little does the memory of these human inhabitants enhance the beauty of the landscape! Again, perhaps, Nature will try, with me for a first settler, and my house raised last spring to be the oldest in the hamlet.

But this small village, a seed of something greater, why did it fail while Concord holds its ground? Were there no natural advantages—no water sources, really? Yes, the deep Walden Pond and cool Brister’s Spring—what a privilege to take long, healthy drinks from these, all ignored by these men except to weaken their glass. They were generally a thirsty crowd. Couldn’t the basket-making, stable-cleaning, mat-weaving, corn-roasting, linen-spinning, and pottery work have thrived here, turning the wilderness into a blooming landscape, and a large posterity could have inherited their fathers' land? The poor soil would at least have been resistant to lowland decline. Alas! how little the memory of these human inhabitants adds to the beauty of the landscape! Again, perhaps Nature will try, with me as the first settler, and my house built last spring to be the oldest in the village.

I am not aware that any man has ever built on the spot which I occupy. Deliver me from a city built on the site of a more ancient city, whose materials are ruins, whose gardens cemeteries. The soil is blanched and accursed there, and before that becomes necessary the earth itself will be destroyed. With such reminiscences I repeopled the woods and lulled myself asleep.

I don’t know if anyone has ever built on the land I’m on. Get me out of a city that’s been built on the remains of an older one, where the materials are just ruins and the gardens are graveyards. The soil is lifeless and cursed there, and before it gets to that point, the earth itself will be gone. With those memories, I filled the woods with life again and drifted off to sleep.

At this season I seldom had a visitor. When the snow lay deepest no wanderer ventured near my house for a week or fortnight at a time, but there I lived as snug as a meadow mouse, or as cattle and poultry which are said to have survived for a long time buried in drifts, even without food; or like that early settler’s family in the town of Sutton, in this state, whose cottage was completely covered by the great snow of 1717 when he was absent, and an Indian found it only by the hole which the chimney’s breath made in the drift, and so relieved the family. But no friendly Indian concerned himself about me; nor needed he, for the master of the house was at home. The Great Snow! How cheerful it is to hear of! When the farmers could not get to the woods and swamps with their teams, and were obliged to cut down the shade trees before their houses, and when the crust was harder, cut off the trees in the swamps, ten feet from the ground, as it appeared the next spring.

At this time of year, I rarely had visitors. When the snow was deepest, no one would come near my house for a week or two at a time, but I lived as cozy as a meadow mouse, or like the livestock that are said to have survived for a long time buried in snowdrifts, even without food; or like that early settler's family in Sutton, in this state, whose cottage was completely hidden by the massive snow in 1717 while he was away, and an Indian found it only by the hole that the chimney’s smoke made in the drift, thereby rescuing the family. But no friendly Indian was concerned with me; nor did he need to be, as the master of the house was at home. The Great Snow! How delightful it is to hear about! When the farmers couldn’t reach the woods and swamps with their teams and had to cut down the shade trees in front of their houses, and when the snow crust was hard enough, they chopped off the trees in the swamps ten feet above the ground, as was evident the following spring.

In the deepest snows, the path which I used from the highway to my house, about half a mile long, might have been represented by a meandering dotted line, with wide intervals between the dots. For a week of even weather I took exactly the same number of steps, and of the same length, coming and going, stepping deliberately and with the precision of a pair of dividers in my own deep tracks,—to such routine the winter reduces us,—yet often they were filled with heaven’s own blue. But no weather interfered fatally with my walks, or rather my going abroad, for I frequently tramped eight or ten miles through the deepest snow to keep an appointment with a beech-tree, or a yellow-birch, or an old acquaintance among the pines; when the ice and snow causing their limbs to droop, and so sharpening their tops, had changed the pines into fir-trees; wading to the tops of the highest hills when the snow was nearly two feet deep on a level, and shaking down another snow-storm on my head at every step; or sometimes creeping and floundering thither on my hands and knees, when the hunters had gone into winter quarters. One afternoon I amused myself by watching a barred owl (Strix nebulosa) sitting on one of the lower dead limbs of a white-pine, close to the trunk, in broad daylight, I standing within a rod of him. He could hear me when I moved and cronched the snow with my feet, but could not plainly see me. When I made most noise he would stretch out his neck, and erect his neck feathers, and open his eyes wide; but their lids soon fell again, and he began to nod. I too felt a slumberous influence after watching him half an hour, as he sat thus with his eyes half open, like a cat, winged brother of the cat. There was only a narrow slit left between their lids, by which he preserved a peninsular relation to me; thus, with half-shut eyes, looking out from the land of dreams, and endeavoring to realize me, vague object or mote that interrupted his visions. At length, on some louder noise or my nearer approach, he would grow uneasy and sluggishly turn about on his perch, as if impatient at having his dreams disturbed; and when he launched himself off and flapped through the pines, spreading his wings to unexpected breadth, I could not hear the slightest sound from them. Thus, guided amid the pine boughs rather by a delicate sense of their neighborhood than by sight, feeling his twilight way as it were with his sensitive pinions, he found a new perch, where he might in peace await the dawning of his day.

In the deepest snow, the path I took from the highway to my house, about half a mile long, could have been drawn as a winding dotted line, with big gaps between the dots. For a week of consistent weather, I took exactly the same number of steps, of the same length, coming and going, moving purposefully and with the precision of a pair of dividers in my own deep tracks—this is how winter reduces us—yet often those tracks were filled with heaven's own blue. But no weather prevented me from going out, or rather my outings, as I regularly hiked eight or ten miles through the deepest snow to keep an appointment with a beech tree, or a yellow birch, or an old friend among the pines; when the ice and snow caused their branches to droop, sharping their tops, turning the pines into fir trees; wading to the tops of the highest hills when the snow was nearly two feet deep flat, and shaking off another snowstorm on my head with every step; or sometimes crawling and struggling there on my hands and knees when the hunters had gone into winter hibernation. One afternoon, I entertained myself by watching a barred owl (Strix nebulosa) sitting on one of the lower dead branches of a white pine, close to the trunk, in broad daylight, while I stood within a rod of it. It could hear me when I moved and crunched the snow with my feet but couldn't see me clearly. When I made the most noise, it would stretch out its neck, puff up its neck feathers, and open its eyes wide; but their eyelids soon dropped again, and it began to nod off. I too felt a sleepy influence after watching it for half an hour, as it sat there with its eyes half open, like a winged feline relative. There was just a narrow slit left between its eyelids, allowing it to have a peninsular connection to me; thus, with half-closed eyes, looking out from the world of dreams, it tried to recognize me, a vague shape or speck that interrupted its visions. Eventually, at some louder noise or my closer approach, it would become restless and slowly turn around on its perch, as if annoyed about having its dreams disturbed; and when it launched itself off and flew through the pines, spreading its wings to an unexpected width, I couldn't hear the slightest sound from them. Guided through the pine branches more by a delicate sense of their presence than by sight, and feeling its way in the dim light with its sensitive wings, it found a new perch where it could peacefully wait for the dawn of its day.

As I walked over the long causeway made for the railroad through the meadows, I encountered many a blustering and nipping wind, for nowhere has it freer play; and when the frost had smitten me on one cheek, heathen as I was, I turned to it the other also. Nor was it much better by the carriage road from Brister’s Hill. For I came to town still, like a friendly Indian, when the contents of the broad open fields were all piled up between the walls of the Walden road, and half an hour sufficed to obliterate the tracks of the last traveller. And when I returned new drifts would have formed, through which I floundered, where the busy north-west wind had been depositing the powdery snow round a sharp angle in the road, and not a rabbit’s track, nor even the fine print, the small type, of a meadow mouse was to be seen. Yet I rarely failed to find, even in mid-winter, some warm and springly swamp where the grass and the skunk-cabbage still put forth with perennial verdure, and some hardier bird occasionally awaited the return of spring.

As I walked along the long bridge built for the train through the meadows, I faced many strong and biting winds, since there's nowhere it blows more freely; and when the frost hit one side of my face, as unfazed as I was, I turned to let it hit the other. It was no better by the road from Brister’s Hill. I arrived in town like a friendly Indian, with the wide open fields all piled up between the walls of Walden Road, and within half an hour, the last traveler’s tracks would have vanished. When I came back, new snowdrifts had formed, making it tough to walk, where the gusty northwest wind had piled the light snow around a sharp turn in the road, and there wasn’t a single rabbit’s track, nor even the tiny print of a meadow mouse in sight. Yet I almost always managed to find, even in the middle of winter, a warm and spring-like wetland where the grass and skunk cabbage still thrived with their everlasting greenery, and a few hardier birds sometimes awaited the arrival of spring.

Sometimes, notwithstanding the snow, when I returned from my walk at evening I crossed the deep tracks of a woodchopper leading from my door, and found his pile of whittlings on the hearth, and my house filled with the odor of his pipe. Or on a Sunday afternoon, if I chanced to be at home, I heard the cronching of the snow made by the step of a long-headed farmer, who from far through the woods sought my house, to have a social “crack;” one of the few of his vocation who are “men on their farms;” who donned a frock instead of a professor’s gown, and is as ready to extract the moral out of church or state as to haul a load of manure from his barn-yard. We talked of rude and simple times, when men sat about large fires in cold bracing weather, with clear heads; and when other dessert failed, we tried our teeth on many a nut which wise squirrels have long since abandoned, for those which have the thickest shells are commonly empty.

Sometimes, despite the snow, when I came back from my evening walk, I crossed the deep tracks of a woodchopper leading from my door, found his pile of shavings on the hearth, and my house filled with the smell of his pipe. Or on a Sunday afternoon, if I happened to be at home, I heard the crunching of the snow made by the steps of a thoughtful farmer, who from far away through the woods came to my house for a friendly chat; one of the few in his profession who really understands what it means to be a "man on his farm," who wore a work coat instead of a professor’s gown, and was just as ready to draw wisdom from church or state as to haul a load of manure from his barn. We talked about simpler times when people gathered around large fires in cold weather, with clear heads; and when other desserts ran out, we used our teeth on many a nut that wise squirrels have long since left behind because the ones with the thickest shells are usually empty.

The one who came from farthest to my lodge, through deepest snows and most dismal tempests, was a poet. A farmer, a hunter, a soldier, a reporter, even a philosopher, may be daunted; but nothing can deter a poet, for he is actuated by pure love. Who can predict his comings and goings? His business calls him out at all hours, even when doctors sleep. We made that small house ring with boisterous mirth and resound with the murmur of much sober talk, making amends then to Walden vale for the long silences. Broadway was still and deserted in comparison. At suitable intervals there were regular salutes of laughter, which might have been referred indifferently to the last uttered or the forth-coming jest. We made many a “bran new” theory of life over a thin dish of gruel, which combined the advantages of conviviality with the clear-headedness which philosophy requires.

The person who traveled the farthest to my lodge, through deep snow and terrible storms, was a poet. A farmer, a hunter, a soldier, a journalist, or even a philosopher might feel overwhelmed; but nothing can stop a poet, because he is driven by pure love. Who can predict when he'll arrive or leave? His work calls him at all hours, even when doctors are asleep. We filled that little house with loud laughter and deep conversations, making up for the long silences with the beauty of Walden. Broadway was quiet and empty by comparison. At just the right moments, we burst into laughter, which could have been inspired by the last joke or the one coming next. We created many “brand new” theories of life over a simple bowl of gruel, which offered the benefits of good company along with the clarity that philosophy demands.

I should not forget that during my last winter at the pond there was another welcome visitor, who at one time came through the village, through snow and rain and darkness, till he saw my lamp through the trees, and shared with me some long winter evenings. One of the last of the philosophers,—Connecticut gave him to the world,—he peddled first her wares, afterwards, as he declares, his brains. These he peddles still, prompting God and disgracing man, bearing for fruit his brain only, like the nut its kernel. I think that he must be the man of the most faith of any alive. His words and attitude always suppose a better state of things than other men are acquainted with, and he will be the last man to be disappointed as the ages revolve. He has no venture in the present. But though comparatively disregarded now, when his day comes, laws unsuspected by most will take effect, and masters of families and rulers will come to him for advice.—

I shouldn't forget that during my last winter at the pond, there was another welcome visitor who, at one point, made his way through the village, braving snow, rain, and darkness until he saw my lamp through the trees and spent some long winter evenings with me. One of the last great philosophers—Connecticut gave him to the world—he first peddled her goods and later, as he states, his ideas. He's still peddling those, challenging God and embarrassing mankind, with his mind yielding only thoughts, much like a nut contains its kernel. I believe he must have more faith than anyone else alive. His words and demeanor always suggest a better reality than what most people know, and he will be the last to feel let down as time goes on. He has no stake in the present. However, even though he's somewhat overlooked now, when his moment arrives, laws that most people are unaware of will come into play, and family leaders and rulers will seek his counsel.

“How blind that cannot see serenity!”

“How blind are those who cannot see peace!”

A true friend of man; almost the only friend of human progress. An Old Mortality, say rather an Immortality, with unwearied patience and faith making plain the image engraven in men’s bodies, the God of whom they are but defaced and leaning monuments. With his hospitable intellect he embraces children, beggars, insane, and scholars, and entertains the thought of all, adding to it commonly some breadth and elegance. I think that he should keep a caravansary on the world’s highway, where philosophers of all nations might put up, and on his sign should be printed, “Entertainment for man, but not for his beast. Enter ye that have leisure and a quiet mind, who earnestly seek the right road.” He is perhaps the sanest man and has the fewest crotchets of any I chance to know; the same yesterday and tomorrow. Of yore we had sauntered and talked, and effectually put the world behind us; for he was pledged to no institution in it, freeborn, ingenuus. Whichever way we turned, it seemed that the heavens and the earth had met together, since he enhanced the beauty of the landscape. A blue-robed man, whose fittest roof is the overarching sky which reflects his serenity. I do not see how he can ever die; Nature cannot spare him.

A true friend to humanity; nearly the only ally of human progress. An Old Mortality, or rather an Immortality, with tireless patience and faith, revealing the image etched in people's bodies, the God of whom they are merely worn and leaning monuments. With his welcoming intellect, he embraces children, beggars, the insane, and scholars, and gives thoughtful consideration to everyone, usually adding some depth and elegance. I think he should operate a rest stop on the world’s highway, where philosophers from all nations could stay, with a sign that reads, “Entertainment for mankind, but not for his beast. Enter those who have leisure and peace of mind, who earnestly seek the right path.” He is perhaps the sanest person I know, with the fewest quirks; the same yesterday and tomorrow. We used to wander and chat, leaving the world behind; for he was committed to no institution in it, freeborn, ingenuus. Wherever we turned, it felt like the heavens and the earth had come together, as he heightened the beauty of the landscape. A man in a blue robe, whose best roof is the expansive sky that reflects his calmness. I don’t see how he can ever die; Nature cannot spare him.

Having each some shingles of thought well dried, we sat and whittled them, trying our knives, and admiring the clear yellowish grain of the pumpkin pine. We waded so gently and reverently, or we pulled together so smoothly, that the fishes of thought were not scared from the stream, nor feared any angler on the bank, but came and went grandly, like the clouds which float through the western sky, and the mother-o’-pearl flocks which sometimes form and dissolve there. There we worked, revising mythology, rounding a fable here and there, and building castles in the air for which earth offered no worthy foundation. Great Looker! Great Expecter! to converse with whom was a New England Night’s Entertainment. Ah! such discourse we had, hermit and philosopher, and the old settler I have spoken of,—we three,—it expanded and racked my little house; I should not dare to say how many pounds’ weight there was above the atmospheric pressure on every circular inch; it opened its seams so that they had to be calked with much dulness thereafter to stop the consequent leak;—but I had enough of that kind of oakum already picked.

With our thoughts well-formed, we sat and carved away, testing our knives and admiring the beautiful yellowish grain of the pine. We moved so gently and respectfully, or we worked together so smoothly, that the ideas didn’t get scared away from the stream, nor did they fear any fishermen on the bank, but flowed in and out majestically, like the clouds drifting through the western sky, and the shimmering formations that sometimes appear and disappear there. We toiled, revising myths, polishing fables here and there, and dreaming up lofty ideas that reality couldn’t support. Great Looker! Great Expecter! talking to you was the highlight of a New England night. Oh, the conversations we had, between the hermit, the philosopher, and the old settler I mentioned—we three—my small thoughts expanded and stressed my fragile mind; I wouldn't even want to estimate how much pressure there was on every circular inch of it; it opened up so much that I had to keep patching it with dullness afterwards to stop the leaks; but I had more than enough of that kind of stuffing already.

There was one other with whom I had “solid seasons,” long to be remembered, at his house in the village, and who looked in upon me from time to time; but I had no more for society there.

There was one other person with whom I had “solid seasons,” memorable times, at his house in the village, who would check in on me from time to time; but I had no one else for company there.

There too, as every where, I sometimes expected the Visitor who never comes. The Vishnu Purana says, “The house-holder is to remain at eventide in his court-yard as long as it takes to milk a cow, or longer if he pleases, to await the arrival of a guest.” I often performed this duty of hospitality, waited long enough to milk a whole herd of cows, but did not see the man approaching from the town.

There too, like everywhere else, I sometimes found myself waiting for the Visitor who never shows up. The Vishnu Purana states, “A householder should stay in his courtyard at dusk for as long as it takes to milk a cow, or longer if he wants, to wait for a guest.” I often took on this role of hospitality, waiting long enough to milk an entire herd of cows, but I didn’t see anyone coming from the town.

Winter Animals

When the ponds were firmly frozen, they afforded not only new and shorter routes to many points, but new views from their surfaces of the familiar landscape around them. When I crossed Flint’s Pond, after it was covered with snow, though I had often paddled about and skated over it, it was so unexpectedly wide and so strange that I could think of nothing but Baffin’s Bay. The Lincoln hills rose up around me at the extremity of a snowy plain, in which I did not remember to have stood before; and the fishermen, at an indeterminable distance over the ice, moving slowly about with their wolfish dogs, passed for sealers or Esquimaux, or in misty weather loomed like fabulous creatures, and I did not know whether they were giants or pygmies. I took this course when I went to lecture in Lincoln in the evening, travelling in no road and passing no house between my own hut and the lecture room. In Goose Pond, which lay in my way, a colony of muskrats dwelt, and raised their cabins high above the ice, though none could be seen abroad when I crossed it. Walden, being like the rest usually bare of snow, or with only shallow and interrupted drifts on it, was my yard, where I could walk freely when the snow was nearly two feet deep on a level elsewhere and the villagers were confined to their streets. There, far from the village street, and except at very long intervals, from the jingle of sleigh-bells, I slid and skated, as in a vast moose-yard well trodden, overhung by oak woods and solemn pines bent down with snow or bristling with icicles.

When the ponds were solidly frozen, they not only provided new, shorter paths to various places but also offered fresh perspectives of the familiar landscape around them. When I crossed Flint’s Pond, after it had been blanketed in snow, even though I had often paddled and skated on it, it felt unexpectedly vast and so different that it reminded me of Baffin’s Bay. The Lincoln hills rose up around me at the edge of a snowy plain that I didn’t remember standing on before, and the fishermen, at an unclear distance over the ice, moved slowly with their wolfish dogs, resembling seal hunters or Eskimos. On misty days, they appeared like mythical beings, and I couldn’t tell if they were giants or tiny people. I took this path when I went to speak in Lincoln that evening, traveling through no road and passing no houses between my hut and the lecture hall. In Goose Pond, which was on my route, a colony of muskrats lived and built their lodges high above the ice, although none were visible when I crossed it. Walden, usually bare of snow or with only shallow and scattered drifts, was my yard where I could walk freely when the snow was nearly two feet deep elsewhere, confining the villagers to their streets. There, far from the village street and, except at long intervals, the sound of sleigh bells, I glided and skated as if in a vast moose yard, well-trodden and surrounded by oak woods and solemn pines weighted down with snow or adorned with icicles.

For sounds in winter nights, and often in winter days, I heard the forlorn but melodious note of a hooting owl indefinitely far; such a sound as the frozen earth would yield if struck with a suitable plectrum, the very lingua vernacula of Walden Wood, and quite familiar to me at last, though I never saw the bird while it was making it. I seldom opened my door in a winter evening without hearing it; Hoo hoo hoo, hoorer, hoo, sounded sonorously, and the first three syllables accented somewhat like how der do; or sometimes hoo hoo only. One night in the beginning of winter, before the pond froze over, about nine o’clock, I was startled by the loud honking of a goose, and, stepping to the door, heard the sound of their wings like a tempest in the woods as they flew low over my house. They passed over the pond toward Fair Haven, seemingly deterred from settling by my light, their commodore honking all the while with a regular beat. Suddenly an unmistakable cat-owl from very near me, with the most harsh and tremendous voice I ever heard from any inhabitant of the woods, responded at regular intervals to the goose, as if determined to expose and disgrace this intruder from Hudson’s Bay by exhibiting a greater compass and volume of voice in a native, and boo-hoo him out of Concord horizon. What do you mean by alarming the citadel at this time of night consecrated to me? Do you think I am ever caught napping at such an hour, and that I have not got lungs and a larynx as well as yourself? Boo-hoo, boo-hoo, boo-hoo! It was one of the most thrilling discords I ever heard. And yet, if you had a discriminating ear, there were in it the elements of a concord such as these plains never saw nor heard.

On winter nights, and often during winter days, I heard the lonely yet beautiful hoot of an owl far away; it was the kind of sound that the frozen earth would make if struck with a suitable plectrum, the very lingua vernacula of Walden Wood, and I became quite familiar with it over time, although I never actually saw the bird while it was making the noise. I hardly ever opened my door on a winter evening without hearing it; Hoo hoo hoo, hoorer, hoo, resonated loudly, with the first three syllables sounding a bit like how der do; or sometimes just hoo hoo. One night at the start of winter, before the pond froze over, I was startled by the loud honking of a goose. Stepping to the door, I heard the sound of their wings like a storm in the woods as they flew low over my house. They flew over the pond toward Fair Haven, seeming hesitated to land because of my light, with their leader honking steadily. Suddenly, a distinct cat-owl very close to me responded at regular intervals with the most harsh and powerful voice I ever heard from any creature in the woods, as if determined to expose and shame this intruder from Hudson’s Bay by showing off a greater range and volume of voice in its own territory, effectively driving it out of the Concord area. What are you doing alarming the fortress at this hour that’s dedicated to me? Do you think I’m ever caught off guard at such a time and that I don’t have lungs and a larynx just like you? Boo-hoo, boo-hoo, boo-hoo! It was one of the most thrilling dissonances I ever experienced. Yet, if you had a discerning ear, you could detect in it the elements of a harmony that these plains had never seen or heard.

I also heard the whooping of the ice in the pond, my great bed-fellow in that part of Concord, as if it were restless in its bed and would fain turn over, were troubled with flatulency and had dreams; or I was waked by the cracking of the ground by the frost, as if some one had driven a team against my door, and in the morning would find a crack in the earth a quarter of a mile long and a third of an inch wide.

I also heard the ice in the pond making noises, my great companion in that part of Concord, as if it were restless in its sleep and wanted to turn over, bothered by gas and having dreams; or I was woken by the ground cracking from the frost, as if someone had driven a team right up to my door, and in the morning I would find a crack in the earth a quarter of a mile long and a third of an inch wide.

Sometimes I heard the foxes as they ranged over the snow crust, in moonlight nights, in search of a partridge or other game, barking raggedly and demoniacally like forest dogs, as if laboring with some anxiety, or seeking expression, struggling for light and to be dogs outright and run freely in the streets; for if we take the ages into our account, may there not be a civilization going on among brutes as well as men? They seemed to me to be rudimental, burrowing men, still standing on their defence, awaiting their transformation. Sometimes one came near to my window, attracted by my light, barked a vulpine curse at me, and then retreated.

Sometimes I heard the foxes moving over the snow at night, in the moonlight, looking for a partridge or other prey, barking roughly and eerily like wild dogs, as if they were anxious or trying to express something, struggling to be free and run in the streets like dogs should. If we consider the ages, isn’t there a chance that there’s a kind of civilization happening among animals just like there is among humans? They seemed to me to be primitive, underground humans, still on guard, waiting for their change. Sometimes one would come close to my window, drawn in by my light, bark a vulpine curse at me, and then disappear.

Usually the red squirrel (Sciurus Hudsonius) waked me in the dawn, coursing over the roof and up and down the sides of the house, as if sent out of the woods for this purpose. In the course of the winter I threw out half a bushel of ears of sweet-corn, which had not got ripe, on to the snow crust by my door, and was amused by watching the motions of the various animals which were baited by it. In the twilight and the night the rabbits came regularly and made a hearty meal. All day long the red squirrels came and went, and afforded me much entertainment by their manœuvres. One would approach at first warily through the shrub-oaks, running over the snow crust by fits and starts like a leaf blown by the wind, now a few paces this way, with wonderful speed and waste of energy, making inconceivable haste with his “trotters,” as if it were for a wager, and now as many paces that way, but never getting on more than half a rod at a time; and then suddenly pausing with a ludicrous expression and a gratuitous somerset, as if all the eyes in the universe were fixed on him,—for all the motions of a squirrel, even in the most solitary recesses of the forest, imply spectators as much as those of a dancing girl,—wasting more time in delay and circumspection than would have sufficed to walk the whole distance,—I never saw one walk,—and then suddenly, before you could say Jack Robinson, he would be in the top of a young pitch-pine, winding up his clock and chiding all imaginary spectators, soliloquizing and talking to all the universe at the same time,—for no reason that I could ever detect, or he himself was aware of, I suspect. At length he would reach the corn, and selecting a suitable ear, frisk about in the same uncertain trigonometrical way to the top-most stick of my wood-pile, before my window, where he looked me in the face, and there sit for hours, supplying himself with a new ear from time to time, nibbling at first voraciously and throwing the half-naked cobs about; till at length he grew more dainty still and played with his food, tasting only the inside of the kernel, and the ear, which was held balanced over the stick by one paw, slipped from his careless grasp and fell to the ground, when he would look over at it with a ludicrous expression of uncertainty, as if suspecting that it had life, with a mind not made up whether to get it again, or a new one, or be off; now thinking of corn, then listening to hear what was in the wind. So the little impudent fellow would waste many an ear in a forenoon; till at last, seizing some longer and plumper one, considerably bigger than himself, and skilfully balancing it, he would set out with it to the woods, like a tiger with a buffalo, by the same zig-zag course and frequent pauses, scratching along with it as if it were too heavy for him and falling all the while, making its fall a diagonal between a perpendicular and horizontal, being determined to put it through at any rate;—a singularly frivolous and whimsical fellow;—and so he would get off with it to where he lived, perhaps carry it to the top of a pine tree forty or fifty rods distant, and I would afterwards find the cobs strewn about the woods in various directions.

Typically, the red squirrel (Sciurus Hudsonius) would wake me at dawn, scurrying across the roof and up and down the sides of the house, as if it had been sent from the woods for this exact purpose. Over the winter, I tossed out half a bushel of ears of sweet corn that hadn’t ripened yet onto the snow by my door, enjoying the antics of the different animals that were attracted to it. In the evening and at night, rabbits would come regularly for a hearty meal. All day long, the red squirrels came and went, providing endless entertainment with their antics. One would cautiously approach through the shrub oaks, darting over the snow as if it were a leaf blown by the wind, making quick movements this way and that, expending a lot of energy as if racing against time, and then suddenly stopping with a funny expression and an unexpected flip, as if all eyes were on him—because every squirrel’s movement, even in the deepest woods, seems to suggest an audience, just like a dancer’s. They wasted more time hesitating and being cautious than it would have taken to cover the distance in a straight walk—I never saw one just walk—and then, before you could even say "Jack Robinson," it would be in the top of a young pitch pine, winding down and playfully scolding all imaginary onlookers, talking to the universe for no reason I could figure out, or he was aware of, I suspect. Eventually, he would reach the corn, selecting a nice ear and then darting in that same unpredictable way to the highest point of my woodpile outside my window, looking straight at me, and there he would sit for hours, grabbing a new ear from time to time, first munching away eagerly and tossing the empty cobs aside; eventually, he’d become more picky, just nibbling the insides and letting one ear slip from his grasp while it was balanced awkwardly over a stick. He would then glance at it with a funny, uncertain expression, as if suspecting it might come to life, unsure whether to retrieve it, get a new one, or take off; one moment thinking of corn, the next listening intently to the wind. So, this cheeky little guy would waste many an ear in a morning; until finally, he’d seize a longer, plumper one, much bigger than himself, balance it skillfully, and head toward the woods like a tiger with a buffalo, moving in a zig-zag pattern and stopping often, struggling with it as if it were too heavy, all the while changing its trajectory between vertical and horizontal, determined to carry it no matter what; he was quite the whimsical character—and off he’d go to where he lived, maybe taking it to the top of a pine tree forty or fifty yards away, and later I would find the cobs scattered throughout the woods in various places.

At length the jays arrive, whose discordant screams were heard long before, as they were warily making their approach an eighth of a mile off, and in a stealthy and sneaking manner they flit from tree to tree, nearer and nearer, and pick up the kernels which the squirrels have dropped. Then, sitting on a pitch-pine bough, they attempt to swallow in their haste a kernel which is too big for their throats and chokes them; and after great labor they disgorge it, and spend an hour in the endeavor to crack it by repeated blows with their bills. They were manifestly thieves, and I had not much respect for them; but the squirrels, though at first shy, went to work as if they were taking what was their own.

Finally, the jays show up, their harsh cries heard long before as they cautiously approach from an eighth of a mile away. They move stealthily from tree to tree, getting closer and closer, picking up the kernels that the squirrels have dropped. Then, perched on a pitch pine branch, they try to quickly swallow a kernel that's too big for them, choking in the process. After a lot of effort, they spit it out and spend an hour trying to crack it by repeatedly pecking at it. They were clearly thieves, and I didn’t think much of them; but the squirrels, though initially timid, went about it like they were claiming what belonged to them.

Meanwhile also came the chickadees in flocks, which, picking up the crumbs the squirrels had dropped, flew to the nearest twig, and, placing them under their claws, hammered away at them with their little bills, as if it were an insect in the bark, till they were sufficiently reduced for their slender throats. A little flock of these tit-mice came daily to pick a dinner out of my wood-pile, or the crumbs at my door, with faint flitting lisping notes, like the tinkling of icicles in the grass, or else with sprightly day day day, or more rarely, in spring-like days, a wiry summery phe-be from the wood-side. They were so familiar that at length one alighted on an armful of wood which I was carrying in, and pecked at the sticks without fear. I once had a sparrow alight upon my shoulder for a moment while I was hoeing in a village garden, and I felt that I was more distinguished by that circumstance than I should have been by any epaulet I could have worn. The squirrels also grew at last to be quite familiar, and occasionally stepped upon my shoe, when that was the nearest way.

Meanwhile, the chickadees arrived in flocks, picking up the crumbs that the squirrels dropped. They would fly to the nearest twig, holding the crumbs under their feet and pecking at them with their tiny bills, as if they were insects hidden in the bark, until the pieces were small enough for their slender throats. A small group of these birds came every day to find a meal in my woodpile or the crumbs at my door, making gentle, fluttering sounds like the tinkling of icicles in the grass, or sometimes cheerfully repeating day day day, or, less frequently, on sunny spring-like days, a lively phe-be from the edge of the woods. They became so familiar that one day, a chickadee landed on a stack of wood I was carrying inside and pecked at the sticks without any fear. Once, while I was hoeing in a village garden, a sparrow even landed on my shoulder for a moment, and I felt more distinguished by that experience than I would have felt wearing any military insignia. The squirrels also eventually became quite familiar, sometimes stepping onto my shoe when it was the quickest way past me.

When the ground was not yet quite covered, and again near the end of winter, when the snow was melted on my south hill-side and about my wood-pile, the partridges came out of the woods morning and evening to feed there. Whichever side you walk in the woods the partridge bursts away on whirring wings, jarring the snow from the dry leaves and twigs on high, which comes sifting down in the sun-beams like golden dust; for this brave bird is not to be scared by winter. It is frequently covered up by drifts, and, it is said, “sometimes plunges from on wing into the soft snow, where it remains concealed for a day or two.” I used to start them in the open land also, where they had come out of the woods at sunset to “bud” the wild apple-trees. They will come regularly every evening to particular trees, where the cunning sportsman lies in wait for them, and the distant orchards next the woods suffer thus not a little. I am glad that the partridge gets fed, at any rate. It is Nature’s own bird which lives on buds and diet-drink.

When the ground wasn’t completely covered yet, and again near the end of winter, when the snow had melted on my south hillside and around my woodpile, the partridges came out of the woods morning and evening to feed there. No matter which side you walk on in the woods, the partridge takes off with a flurry of wings, shaking the snow from the dry leaves and twigs above, which falls down in the sunlight like golden dust; this brave bird isn’t scared of winter. It often gets buried in snowdrifts, and I've heard that “sometimes it dives from the air into the soft snow, where it stays hidden for a day or two.” I used to flush them out in the open land too, where they would come out of the woods at sunset to nibble on the wild apple trees. They show up regularly every evening at certain trees, where clever hunters wait for them, and the distant orchards near the woods suffer quite a bit because of this. I'm just glad that the partridge gets to eat, at least. It’s Nature’s own bird that feeds on buds and natural goodies.

In dark winter mornings, or in short winter afternoons, I sometimes heard a pack of hounds threading all the woods with hounding cry and yelp, unable to resist the instinct of the chase, and the note of the hunting horn at intervals, proving that man was in the rear. The woods ring again, and yet no fox bursts forth on to the open level of the pond, nor following pack pursuing their Actæon. And perhaps at evening I see the hunters returning with a single brush trailing from their sleigh for a trophy, seeking their inn. They tell me that if the fox would remain in the bosom of the frozen earth he would be safe, or if he would run in a straight line away no fox-hound could overtake him; but, having left his pursuers far behind, he stops to rest and listen till they come up, and when he runs he circles round to his old haunts, where the hunters await him. Sometimes, however, he will run upon a wall many rods, and then leap off far to one side, and he appears to know that water will not retain his scent. A hunter told me that he once saw a fox pursued by hounds burst out on to Walden when the ice was covered with shallow puddles, run part way across, and then return to the same shore. Ere long the hounds arrived, but here they lost the scent. Sometimes a pack hunting by themselves would pass my door, and circle round my house, and yelp and hound without regarding me, as if afflicted by a species of madness, so that nothing could divert them from the pursuit. Thus they circle until they fall upon the recent trail of a fox, for a wise hound will forsake every thing else for this. One day a man came to my hut from Lexington to inquire after his hound that made a large track, and had been hunting for a week by himself. But I fear that he was not the wiser for all I told him, for every time I attempted to answer his questions he interrupted me by asking, “What do you do here?” He had lost a dog, but found a man.

On dark winter mornings or short winter afternoons, I sometimes heard a pack of hounds echoing through the woods with their cries and barks, driven by the instinct to chase, with the sound of a hunting horn at intervals, showing that a hunter was behind them. The woods would resonate again, yet no fox would rush out into the open space of the pond, nor would the pack chase their Actæon. And maybe in the evening, I’d see the hunters come back with a single brush dragging from their sleigh as a trophy, heading to their inn. They told me that if the fox stayed buried in the frozen ground, he would be safe, or if he ran in a straight line away, no foxhound could catch him; but, after putting some distance between himself and his pursuers, he stops to rest and listen for them, and when he takes off again, he circles back to his old haunts where the hunters wait. Sometimes, though, he would run along a wall for a long distance, then leap off to one side, and it seems he knows that water won’t hold his scent. A hunter once told me that he saw a fox being chased by hounds break out onto Walden when the ice had shallow puddles on it, run partway across, and then return to the same shore. Soon after, the hounds arrived, but lost the scent there. Sometimes a pack hunting on their own would pass by my door, circle around my house, yapping and howling without paying any attention to me, as if they were affected by some sort of madness, so focused that nothing could distract them from the chase. They would circle until they picked up the recent trail of a fox, since a clever hound will abandon everything else for that. One day, a man came to my hut from Lexington to ask about his hound that had made a big track and had been off hunting by itself for a week. But I think he didn’t gain any wisdom from what I told him, because every time I tried to answer his questions, he interrupted me by asking, “What do you do here?” He had lost a dog but found a man.

One old hunter who has a dry tongue, who used to come to bathe in Walden once every year when the water was warmest, and at such times looked in upon me, told me that many years ago he took his gun one afternoon and went out for a cruise in Walden Wood; and as he walked the Wayland road he heard the cry of hounds approaching, and ere long a fox leaped the wall into the road, and as quick as thought leaped the other wall out of the road, and his swift bullet had not touched him. Some way behind came an old hound and her three pups in full pursuit, hunting on their own account, and disappeared again in the woods. Late in the afternoon, as he was resting in the thick woods south of Walden, he heard the voice of the hounds far over toward Fair Haven still pursuing the fox; and on they came, their hounding cry which made all the woods ring sounding nearer and nearer, now from Well-Meadow, now from the Baker Farm. For a long time he stood still and listened to their music, so sweet to a hunter’s ear, when suddenly the fox appeared, threading the solemn aisles with an easy coursing pace, whose sound was concealed by a sympathetic rustle of the leaves, swift and still, keeping the ground, leaving his pursuers far behind; and, leaping upon a rock amid the woods, he sat erect and listening, with his back to the hunter. For a moment compassion restrained the latter’s arm; but that was a short-lived mood, and as quick as thought can follow thought his piece was levelled, and whang!—the fox rolling over the rock lay dead on the ground. The hunter still kept his place and listened to the hounds. Still on they came, and now the near woods resounded through all their aisles with their demoniac cry. At length the old hound burst into view with muzzle to the ground, and snapping the air as if possessed, and ran directly to the rock; but spying the dead fox she suddenly ceased her hounding as if struck dumb with amazement, and walked round and round him in silence; and one by one her pups arrived, and, like their mother, were sobered into silence by the mystery. Then the hunter came forward and stood in their midst, and the mystery was solved. They waited in silence while he skinned the fox, then followed the brush a while, and at length turned off into the woods again. That evening a Weston Squire came to the Concord hunter’s cottage to inquire for his hounds, and told how for a week they had been hunting on their own account from Weston woods. The Concord hunter told him what he knew and offered him the skin; but the other declined it and departed. He did not find his hounds that night, but the next day learned that they had crossed the river and put up at a farm-house for the night, whence, having been well fed, they took their departure early in the morning.

One old hunter with a dry tongue used to come to swim in Walden once a year when the water was warmest, and during those times, he would stop by to see me. He told me that many years ago, he took his gun one afternoon and went for a stroll in Walden Woods. As he walked along the Wayland road, he heard the sound of hounds approaching, and before long, a fox jumped over the wall into the road and quickly leaped over the other wall, escaping his bullet. Not far behind, an old hound and her three pups were chasing after it, disappearing back into the woods. Later in the afternoon, while resting in the thick woods south of Walden, he heard the hounds' voices coming from Fair Haven, still chasing the fox. Their cries, echoing through the woods, grew louder as they came near, now from Well-Meadow, now from the Baker Farm. He stood still for a long time, listening to their sweet melody, so pleasing to a hunter's ear, when suddenly the fox appeared, weaving through the solemn woods with a smooth, quiet pace, the sound of its movement masked by the gentle rustle of the leaves, swift and silent, leaving its pursuers far behind. It leaped onto a rock in the woods, sitting upright and listening, with its back to the hunter. For a moment, compassion held the hunter's hand back, but that feeling faded quickly, and before he could think twice, he aimed his gun, and whang!—the fox rolled over the rock, dead on the ground. The hunter stayed in his spot, listening to the hounds. They kept coming, and now the near woods echoed with their wild cries. Finally, the old hound burst into view, nose to the ground and snapping at the air as if possessed, making her way straight to the rock. But upon seeing the dead fox, she stopped barking, struck dumb with disbelief, and walked around him in silence. One by one, her pups arrived, and like their mother, they were also silenced by the mystery. Then the hunter stepped forward and stood among them, solving the mystery. They waited silently while he skinned the fox, then followed the brush for a little while before heading back into the woods. That evening, a Squire from Weston came to the Concord hunter’s house to ask about his hounds and mentioned that they had been hunting on their own in Weston woods for a week. The Concord hunter shared what he knew and offered him the skin, but the other man declined and left. He didn’t find his hounds that night, but the next day he learned they had crossed the river and stopped at a farmhouse for the night, where they were well-fed before leaving early the next morning.

The hunter who told me this could remember one Sam Nutting, who used to hunt bears on Fair Haven Ledges, and exchange their skins for rum in Concord village; who told him, even, that he had seen a moose there. Nutting had a famous fox-hound named Burgoyne,—he pronounced it Bugine,—which my informant used to borrow. In the “Wast Book” of an old trader of this town, who was also a captain, town-clerk, and representative, I find the following entry. Jan. 18th, 1742–3, “John Melven Cr. by 1 Grey Fox 0—2—3;” they are not now found here; and in his ledger, Feb. 7th, 1743, Hezekiah Stratton has credit “by ½ a Catt skin 0—1—4½;” of course, a wild-cat, for Stratton was a sergeant in the old French war, and would not have got credit for hunting less noble game. Credit is given for deer skins also, and they were daily sold. One man still preserves the horns of the last deer that was killed in this vicinity, and another has told me the particulars of the hunt in which his uncle was engaged. The hunters were formerly a numerous and merry crew here. I remember well one gaunt Nimrod who would catch up a leaf by the road-side and play a strain on it wilder and more melodious, if my memory serves me, than any hunting-horn.

The hunter who shared this with me could recall a guy named Sam Nutting, who used to hunt bears on Fair Haven Ledges and trade their skins for rum in Concord village. He even mentioned that he had seen a moose there. Nutting had a well-known foxhound called Burgoyne—he pronounced it Bugine—that my informant used to borrow. In the “Wast Book” of an old trader from this town, who was also a captain, town clerk, and representative, I found the following entry. Jan. 18th, 1742–3, “John Melven Cr. by 1 Grey Fox 0—2—3;” they are not found here anymore; and in his ledger, Feb. 7th, 1743, Hezekiah Stratton has credit “by ½ a Catt skin 0—1—4½;” obviously, a wild-cat, since Stratton was a sergeant in the old French war and wouldn’t have gotten credit for hunting lesser game. There’s also credit for deer skins, which were sold regularly. One man still keeps the horns from the last deer killed around here, and another has told me the details of the hunt his uncle was part of. The hunters used to be a large and lively group here. I vividly remember one lean hunter who would pick up a leaf by the roadside and play a tune on it that was wilder and more melodious, if I recall correctly, than any hunting horn.

At midnight, when there was a moon, I sometimes met with hounds in my path prowling about the woods, which would skulk out of my way, as if afraid, and stand silent amid the bushes till I had passed.

At midnight, when the moon was out, I sometimes encountered hounds on my path wandering through the woods. They would shuffle out of my way, as if scared, and stay quiet among the bushes until I had gone by.

Squirrels and wild mice disputed for my store of nuts. There were scores of pitch-pines around my house, from one to four inches in diameter, which had been gnawed by mice the previous winter,—a Norwegian winter for them, for the snow lay long and deep, and they were obliged to mix a large proportion of pine bark with their other diet. These trees were alive and apparently flourishing at mid-summer, and many of them had grown a foot, though completely girdled; but after another winter such were without exception dead. It is remarkable that a single mouse should thus be allowed a whole pine tree for its dinner, gnawing round instead of up and down it; but perhaps it is necessary in order to thin these trees, which are wont to grow up densely.

Squirrels and wild mice were fighting over my stash of nuts. There were plenty of pitch-pines around my house, ranging from one to four inches in diameter, which had been chewed by mice the previous winter—a tough Norwegian winter for them, since the snow was deep and lasted a long time, forcing them to mix a lot of pine bark into their diet. These trees were alive and seemed to be thriving in mid-summer, and many of them had grown a foot, even though they were completely ringed; however, after another winter, all of them were dead without exception. It's interesting that a single mouse could be allowed to take over a whole pine tree for its meal, gnawing around it instead of going up and down; but maybe it's necessary to thin out these trees, which tend to grow really densely.

The hares (Lepus Americanus) were very familiar. One had her form under my house all winter, separated from me only by the flooring, and she startled me each morning by her hasty departure when I began to stir,—thump, thump, thump, striking her head against the floor timbers in her hurry. They used to come round my door at dusk to nibble the potato parings which I had thrown out, and were so nearly the color of the ground that they could hardly be distinguished when still. Sometimes in the twilight I alternately lost and recovered sight of one sitting motionless under my window. When I opened my door in the evening, off they would go with a squeak and a bounce. Near at hand they only excited my pity. One evening one sat by my door two paces from me, at first trembling with fear, yet unwilling to move; a poor wee thing, lean and bony, with ragged ears and sharp nose, scant tail and slender paws. It looked as if Nature no longer contained the breed of nobler bloods, but stood on her last toes. Its large eyes appeared young and unhealthy, almost dropsical. I took a step, and lo, away it scud with an elastic spring over the snow crust, straightening its body and its limbs into graceful length, and soon put the forest between me and itself,—the wild free venison, asserting its vigor and the dignity of Nature. Not without reason was its slenderness. Such then was its nature. (Lepus, levipes, light-foot, some think.)

The hares (Lepus Americanus) were very familiar to me. One had her nest under my house all winter, separated from me only by the flooring, and she startled me each morning with her quick escape when I started to wake up—thump, thump, thump, as she hit her head against the floor beams in her rush. They would come by my door at dusk to nibble on the potato peels I had thrown out, and their coloring was so similar to the ground that they were hard to see when they stayed still. Sometimes in the twilight, I would lose and then regain sight of one sitting motionless under my window. Whenever I opened my door in the evening, off they would dash with a squeak and a bounce. Up close, they only made me feel pity. One evening, a hare sat by my door just two steps away from me, trembling with fear but reluctant to move; a poor little thing, thin and bony, with ragged ears and a sharp nose, a short tail, and slender paws. It looked like Nature had run out of stronger breeds and was at her last breath. Its large eyes seemed young and unhealthy, almost swollen. I took a step, and suddenly, it bounded away with an energetic leap over the snow crust, stretching its body and limbs into elegant length, and soon vanished into the forest—a wild, free creature, asserting its strength and the dignity of Nature. Its slenderness was not without reason. Such was its nature. (Lepus, levipes, light-foot, as some believe.)

What is a country without rabbits and partridges? They are among the most simple and indigenous animal products; ancient and venerable families known to antiquity as to modern times; of the very hue and substance of Nature, nearest allied to leaves and to the ground,—and to one another; it is either winged or it is legged. It is hardly as if you had seen a wild creature when a rabbit or a partridge bursts away, only a natural one, as much to be expected as rustling leaves. The partridge and the rabbit are still sure to thrive, like true natives of the soil, whatever revolutions occur. If the forest is cut off, the sprouts and bushes which spring up afford them concealment, and they become more numerous than ever. That must be a poor country indeed that does not support a hare. Our woods teem with them both, and around every swamp may be seen the partridge or rabbit walk, beset with twiggy fences and horse-hair snares, which some cow-boy tends.

What is a country without rabbits and partridges? They are among the simplest and most native animal products; ancient and respected families known from the past to the present; with the same color and essence as Nature, closely related to leaves and the ground—and to each other; it’s either bird or beast. It hardly feels like seeing a wild creature when a rabbit or a partridge suddenly takes off, just a natural occurrence, as expected as rustling leaves. The partridge and the rabbit are sure to thrive, like true natives of the land, no matter what changes happen. If the forest gets cleared, the new sprouts and bushes that grow provide them hiding places, and they become more numerous than ever. It must be a poor country indeed that doesn’t support a hare. Our woods are full of them, and around every swamp, you can spot the partridge or rabbit wandering, surrounded by twig fences and horsehair traps, tended by some cowboy.

The Pond in Winter

After a still winter night I awoke with the impression that some question had been put to me, which I had been endeavoring in vain to answer in my sleep, as what—how—when—where? But there was dawning Nature, in whom all creatures live, looking in at my broad windows with serene and satisfied face, and no question on her lips. I awoke to an answered question, to Nature and daylight. The snow lying deep on the earth dotted with young pines, and the very slope of the hill on which my house is placed, seemed to say, Forward! Nature puts no question and answers none which we mortals ask. She has long ago taken her resolution. “O Prince, our eyes contemplate with admiration and transmit to the soul the wonderful and varied spectacle of this universe. The night veils without doubt a part of this glorious creation; but day comes to reveal to us this great work, which extends from earth even into the plains of the ether.”

After a quiet winter night, I woke up feeling like I had been trying to answer a question I couldn’t quite grasp in my sleep—what, how, when, where? But there was the dawning Nature, in whom all creatures exist, looking in at my wide windows with a calm and content expression, and no question on her lips. I woke up to an answered question, to Nature and daylight. The snow blanketing the ground, speckled with young pines, and the very slope of the hill where my house sits, seemed to say, "Move forward!" Nature asks no questions and gives no answers to the ones we humans pose. She made her decision long ago. “O Prince, our eyes gaze in wonder and convey to the soul the amazing and diverse spectacle of this universe. The night surely hides a part of this glorious creation; but day arrives to reveal to us this great work, which stretches from the earth all the way into the depths of the sky.”

Then to my morning work. First I take an axe and pail and go in search of water, if that be not a dream. After a cold and snowy night it needed a divining rod to find it. Every winter the liquid and trembling surface of the pond, which was so sensitive to every breath, and reflected every light and shadow, becomes solid to the depth of a foot or a foot and a half, so that it will support the heaviest teams, and perchance the snow covers it to an equal depth, and it is not to be distinguished from any level field. Like the marmots in the surrounding hills, it closes its eye-lids and becomes dormant for three months or more. Standing on the snow-covered plain, as if in a pasture amid the hills, I cut my way first through a foot of snow, and then a foot of ice, and open a window under my feet, where, kneeling to drink, I look down into the quiet parlor of the fishes, pervaded by a softened light as through a window of ground glass, with its bright sanded floor the same as in summer; there a perennial waveless serenity reigns as in the amber twilight sky, corresponding to the cool and even temperament of the inhabitants. Heaven is under our feet as well as over our heads.

Then I get to work in the morning. First, I grab an ax and a bucket and head out to find water, if that’s not just a dream. After a cold, snowy night, it might take a divining rod to locate it. Every winter, the liquid and shimmering surface of the pond, which responds to every breeze and reflects every light and shadow, freezes to a depth of about a foot or a foot and a half, so it can support heavy teams. Sometimes the snow covers it to the same depth, making it indistinguishable from any flat field. Like the groundhogs in the nearby hills, it closes its eyelids and goes dormant for three months or more. Standing on the snow-covered plain, as if in a meadow surrounded by hills, I cut through a foot of snow, then a foot of ice, and create a window beneath me. Kneeling to drink, I gaze down into the quiet living room of the fish, bathed in a soft light like that coming through ground glass, with its bright sandy floor just like in the summer; a constant, tranquil calm prevails there, similar to the amber twilight sky, matching the cool and steady nature of its inhabitants. Heaven is beneath our feet as well as above our heads.

Early in the morning, while all things are crisp with frost, men come with fishing reels and slender lunch, and let down their fine lines through the snowy field to take pickerel and perch; wild men, who instinctively follow other fashions and trust other authorities than their townsmen, and by their goings and comings stitch towns together in parts where else they would be ripped. They sit and eat their luncheon in stout fear-naughts on the dry oak leaves on the shore, as wise in natural lore as the citizen is in artificial. They never consulted with books, and know and can tell much less than they have done. The things which they practise are said not yet to be known. Here is one fishing for pickerel with grown perch for bait. You look into his pail with wonder as into a summer pond, as if he kept summer locked up at home, or knew where she had retreated. How, pray, did he get these in mid-winter? O, he got worms out of rotten logs since the ground froze, and so he caught them. His life itself passes deeper in Nature than the studies of the naturalist penetrate; himself a subject for the naturalist. The latter raises the moss and bark gently with his knife in search of insects; the former lays open logs to their core with his axe, and moss and bark fly far and wide. He gets his living by barking trees. Such a man has some right to fish, and I love to see Nature carried out in him. The perch swallows the grub-worm, the pickerel swallows the perch, and the fisher-man swallows the pickerel; and so all the chinks in the scale of being are filled.

Early in the morning, while everything is fresh with frost, people come with fishing rods and simple lunches, dropping their lines through the snowy field to catch pickerel and perch. They are free spirits who naturally follow different trends and trust different sources of knowledge than their townsfolk, stitching together communities in places where they would otherwise fall apart. They sit on dry oak leaves at the shore, enjoying their lunch without a care, as knowledgeable about nature as city folks are about man-made things. They never turn to books and know much less than their experiences suggest. The skills they employ are said to be not yet fully understood. Here’s one fishing for pickerel using grown perch as bait. You gaze into his bucket with amazement, like looking into a summer pond, as if he has summer stored away at home or knows where it has gone. How did he manage to catch these in mid-winter? Oh, he found worms in decaying logs since the ground froze, and that’s how he got them. His life connects more deeply with Nature than a naturalist’s studies do; he is a subject for the naturalist himself. The naturalist gently lifts the moss and bark with his knife looking for insects; the fisherman chops into logs with his axe, sending moss and bark flying. He makes a living by stripping trees. Such a person has every right to fish, and I enjoy witnessing Nature expressed through him. The perch eats the grub-worm, the pickerel eats the perch, and the fisherman eats the pickerel; thus, all the gaps in the hierarchy of life are filled.

When I strolled around the pond in misty weather I was sometimes amused by the primitive mode which some ruder fisherman had adopted. He would perhaps have placed alder branches over the narrow holes in the ice, which were four or five rods apart and an equal distance from the shore, and having fastened the end of the line to a stick to prevent its being pulled through, have passed the slack line over a twig of the alder, a foot or more above the ice, and tied a dry oak leaf to it, which, being pulled down, would show when he had a bite. These alders loomed through the mist at regular intervals as you walked half way round the pond.

When I walked around the pond on a misty day, I was sometimes amused by the basic techniques used by some rough fishermen. They might have put alder branches over narrow holes in the ice, spaced four or five rods apart and an equal distance from the shore. They would secure the end of the line to a stick to stop it from being pulled through, then let the slack line hang over a twig of the alder, about a foot or more above the ice, and attach a dry oak leaf to it. When a fish bit, the leaf would be pulled down, signaling the catch. The alders appeared through the mist at regular intervals as you walked halfway around the pond.

Ah, the pickerel of Walden! when I see them lying on the ice, or in the well which the fisherman cuts in the ice, making a little hole to admit the water, I am always surprised by their rare beauty, as if they were fabulous fishes, they are so foreign to the streets, even to the woods, foreign as Arabia to our Concord life. They possess a quite dazzling and transcendent beauty which separates them by a wide interval from the cadaverous cod and haddock whose fame is trumpeted in our streets. They are not green like the pines, nor gray like the stones, nor blue like the sky; but they have, to my eyes, if possible, yet rarer colors, like flowers and precious stones, as if they were the pearls, the animalized nuclei or crystals of the Walden water. They, of course, are Walden all over and all through; are themselves small Waldens in the animal kingdom, Waldenses. It is surprising that they are caught here,—that in this deep and capacious spring, far beneath the rattling teams and chaises and tinkling sleighs that travel the Walden road, this great gold and emerald fish swims. I never chanced to see its kind in any market; it would be the cynosure of all eyes there. Easily, with a few convulsive quirks, they give up their watery ghosts, like a mortal translated before his time to the thin air of heaven.

Ah, the pickerel of Walden! When I see them lying on the ice or in the hole the fisherman cuts in the ice to let in some water, I’m always amazed by their unique beauty, as if they were extraordinary fish, so different from city life, even from the woods, as Arabia is to our Concord. They have a dazzling and almost otherworldly beauty that sets them far apart from the lifeless cod and haddock that everyone talks about in the streets. They aren’t green like the pines, gray like the stones, or blue like the sky; instead, they have even rarer colors, like flowers and gemstones, as if they were the pearls or crystalized cores of Walden water. They are, without a doubt, a part of Walden all through; they are like little Waldens in the animal kingdom, Waldenses. It's surprising that they are caught here — that in this deep, wide spring, far beneath the passing wagons and sleighs on the Walden road, this beautiful gold and emerald fish swims. I’ve never seen anything like it in any market; it would be the center of attention there. With just a few sudden movements, they give up their watery lives, like a person taken before their time to the crisp air of heaven.

walden_pond_map

As I was desirous to recover the long lost bottom of Walden Pond, I surveyed it carefully, before the ice broke up, early in ’46, with compass and chain and sounding line. There have been many stories told about the bottom, or rather no bottom, of this pond, which certainly had no foundation for themselves. It is remarkable how long men will believe in the bottomlessness of a pond without taking the trouble to sound it. I have visited two such Bottomless Ponds in one walk in this neighborhood. Many have believed that Walden reached quite through to the other side of the globe. Some who have lain flat on the ice for a long time, looking down through the illusive medium, perchance with watery eyes into the bargain, and driven to hasty conclusions by the fear of catching cold in their breasts, have seen vast holes “into which a load of hay might be driven,” if there were any body to drive it, the undoubted source of the Styx and entrance to the Infernal Regions from these parts. Others have gone down from the village with a “fifty-six” and a wagon load of inch rope, but yet have failed to find any bottom; for while the “fifty-six” was resting by the way, they were paying out the rope in the vain attempt to fathom their truly immeasurable capacity for marvellousness. But I can assure my readers that Walden has a reasonably tight bottom at a not unreasonable, though at an unusual, depth. I fathomed it easily with a cod-line and a stone weighing about a pound and a half, and could tell accurately when the stone left the bottom, by having to pull so much harder before the water got underneath to help me. The greatest depth was exactly one hundred and two feet; to which may be added the five feet which it has risen since, making one hundred and seven. This is a remarkable depth for so small an area; yet not an inch of it can be spared by the imagination. What if all ponds were shallow? Would it not react on the minds of men? I am thankful that this pond was made deep and pure for a symbol. While men believe in the infinite some ponds will be thought to be bottomless.

As I wanted to rediscover the long-lost bottom of Walden Pond, I carefully surveyed it before the ice melted, early in '46, using a compass, chain, and sounding line. Many stories have been told about the bottom—or lack thereof—of this pond, which certainly had no basis. It's amazing how long people will believe that a pond has no bottom without even trying to measure it. I've visited two so-called Bottomless Ponds in one walk around here. Some have thought that Walden extended all the way to the other side of the world. There are those who have lain flat on the ice for a long time, looking down through the deceptive surface, perhaps with watery eyes, and jumping to conclusions out of fear of getting cold, who claimed to see huge holes "big enough to drive a load of hay into" if there were anyone to do the driving, supposedly the source of the Styx and a gateway to the Underworld from this area. Others have come from the village with a “fifty-six” and a wagon full of inch rope but still failed to find a bottom; while the “fifty-six” rested along the way, they were letting out the rope in a futile attempt to measure their truly boundless capacity for wonders. But I can assure my readers that Walden has a reasonably solid bottom at a fairly deep, though somewhat unusual, depth. I easily measured it with a cod-line and a stone weighing about a pound and a half, and I could tell exactly when the stone left the bottom because it became harder to pull before the water helped me. The greatest depth was exactly one hundred and two feet; to which you can add the five feet it has risen since, making it one hundred and seven. This is a remarkable depth for such a small area, yet not an inch of it can be taken lightly by the imagination. What if all ponds were shallow? Wouldn’t it affect people’s minds? I’m grateful that this pond was made deep and pure as a symbol. While people believe in the infinite, some ponds will still be thought to be bottomless.

A factory owner, hearing what depth I had found, thought that it could not be true, for, judging from his acquaintance with dams, sand would not lie at so steep an angle. But the deepest ponds are not so deep in proportion to their area as most suppose, and, if drained, would not leave very remarkable valleys. They are not like cups between the hills; for this one, which is so unusually deep for its area, appears in a vertical section through its centre not deeper than a shallow plate. Most ponds, emptied, would leave a meadow no more hollow than we frequently see. William Gilpin, who is so admirable in all that relates to landscapes, and usually so correct, standing at the head of Loch Fyne, in Scotland, which he describes as “a bay of salt water, sixty or seventy fathoms deep, four miles in breadth,” and about fifty miles long, surrounded by mountains, observes, “If we could have seen it immediately after the diluvian crash, or whatever convulsion of Nature occasioned it, before the waters gushed in, what a horrid chasm must it have appeared!

A factory owner, hearing about the depth I discovered, thought it couldn’t be true, since, based on his knowledge of dams, sand wouldn't settle at such a steep angle. However, the deepest ponds are not as deep relative to their area as most people think, and if they were drained, they wouldn't create particularly remarkable valleys. They aren't like cups nestled between the hills; for this one, which is unusually deep for its size, appears in a vertical section through its center as not deeper than a shallow plate. Most ponds, when emptied, would leave a meadow no more hollow than we often see. William Gilpin, who is impressive with everything related to landscapes and usually spot-on, stood at the head of Loch Fyne in Scotland, which he describes as “a bay of salt water, sixty or seventy fathoms deep, four miles wide,” and about fifty miles long, surrounded by mountains. He notes, “If we could have seen it right after the deluge, or whatever natural disaster caused it, before the waters poured in, what a terrifying chasm it must have looked like!

So high as heaved the tumid hills, so low
Down sunk a hollow bottom broad and deep,
Capacious bed of waters—.”

So high as the swollen hills rose, so low Sank a wide and deep hollow bottom, A spacious bed of waters—.

But if, using the shortest diameter of Loch Fyne, we apply these proportions to Walden, which, as we have seen, appears already in a vertical section only like a shallow plate, it will appear four times as shallow. So much for the increased horrors of the chasm of Loch Fyne when emptied. No doubt many a smiling valley with its stretching cornfields occupies exactly such a “horrid chasm,” from which the waters have receded, though it requires the insight and the far sight of the geologist to convince the unsuspecting inhabitants of this fact. Often an inquisitive eye may detect the shores of a primitive lake in the low horizon hills, and no subsequent elevation of the plain has been necessary to conceal their history. But it is easiest, as they who work on the highways know, to find the hollows by the puddles after a shower. The amount of it is, the imagination give it the least license, dives deeper and soars higher than Nature goes. So, probably, the depth of the ocean will be found to be very inconsiderable compared with its breadth.

But if we take the shortest width of Loch Fyne and apply these proportions to Walden, which, as we've seen, looks like a shallow plate in a vertical section, it will seem four times as shallow. That's how much more terrifying the chasm of Loch Fyne appears when it's empty. No doubt many a cheerful valley with its sprawling cornfields sits right over such a “terrifying chasm,” from which the water has receded, although it takes the knowledge and perspective of a geologist to make the unsuspecting locals aware of this fact. Often, a curious eye can spot the remnants of a primitive lake in the low hills of the horizon, and no later rising of the land was needed to hide their history. But it's easiest, as those who work on the highways know, to find the low spots by the puddles after a rain. The truth is, the imagination, if given the slightest freedom, dives deeper and reaches higher than Nature does. So, it's likely that the depth of the ocean will be found to be quite small compared to its width.

As I sounded through the ice I could determine the shape of the bottom with greater accuracy than is possible in surveying harbors which do not freeze over, and I was surprised at its general regularity. In the deepest part there are several acres more level than almost any field which is exposed to the sun wind and plough. In one instance, on a line arbitrarily chosen, the depth did not vary more than one foot in thirty rods; and generally, near the middle, I could calculate the variation for each one hundred feet in any direction beforehand within three or four inches. Some are accustomed to speak of deep and dangerous holes even in quiet sandy ponds like this, but the effect of water under these circumstances is to level all inequalities. The regularity of the bottom and its conformity to the shores and the range of the neighboring hills were so perfect that a distant promontory betrayed itself in the soundings quite across the pond, and its direction could be determined by observing the opposite shore. Cape becomes bar, and plain shoal, and valley and gorge deep water and channel.

As I explored the ice, I could map out the bottom shape more accurately than when surveying harbors that don’t freeze, and I was surprised by how consistent it was. In the deepest area, there are several acres that are more level than almost any sun-exposed, wind-swept, or plowed field. In one case, over a line I picked at random, the depth didn’t change by more than a foot over thirty rods; and generally, toward the center, I could predict the depth variation for every hundred feet in any direction within three or four inches. Some people like to talk about deep and dangerous holes even in calm sandy ponds like this one, but water tends to smooth out all the inconsistencies. The bottom's regularity and its alignment with the shores and surrounding hills were so precise that a distant point revealed itself in the soundings all the way across the pond, and I could figure out its direction by looking at the opposite shore. Cape becomes bar, plain becomes shoal, valley and gorge become deep water and channel.

When I had mapped the pond by the scale of ten rods to an inch, and put down the soundings, more than a hundred in all, I observed this remarkable coincidence. Having noticed that the number indicating the greatest depth was apparently in the centre of the map, I laid a rule on the map lengthwise, and then breadthwise, and found, to my surprise, that the line of greatest length intersected the line of greatest breadth exactly at the point of greatest depth, notwithstanding that the middle is so nearly level, the outline of the pond far from regular, and the extreme length and breadth were got by measuring into the coves; and I said to myself, Who knows but this hint would conduct to the deepest part of the ocean as well as of a pond or puddle? Is not this the rule also for the height of mountains, regarded as the opposite of valleys? We know that a hill is not highest at its narrowest part.

When I mapped the pond at a scale of ten rods to an inch and recorded over a hundred soundings, I noticed something remarkable. I found that the measurement showing the greatest depth was located right in the center of the map. I laid a ruler along the length of the map and then across the width, and, to my surprise, the longest line crossed the widest line exactly at the point of greatest depth, even though the middle is almost level, the shape of the pond is quite irregular, and the maximum length and width were determined by measuring into the coves. I thought to myself, who knows if this clue might lead us to the deepest part of the ocean just like it does for a pond or puddle? Isn't this also the principle for the height of mountains when considered opposite to valleys? We know that a hill isn’t highest at its narrowest point.

Of five coves, three, or all which had been sounded, were observed to have a bar quite across their mouths and deeper water within, so that the bay tended to be an expansion of water within the land not only horizontally but vertically, and to form a basin or independent pond, the direction of the two capes showing the course of the bar. Every harbor on the sea-coast, also, has its bar at its entrance. In proportion as the mouth of the cove was wider compared with its length, the water over the bar was deeper compared with that in the basin. Given, then, the length and breadth of the cove, and the character of the surrounding shore, and you have almost elements enough to make out a formula for all cases.

Out of five coves, three of them, or all that had been measured, were found to have a barrier completely across their entrances and deeper water inside, making the bay appear as an area of water inland not just in width but also in depth, forming a basin or a separate pond, with the layout of the two capes indicating the direction of the barrier. Every harbor along the coastline has a barrier at its mouth as well. As the entrance of the cove was wider in relation to its length, the water over the barrier was deeper compared to that in the basin. Given the length and width of the cove, along with the characteristics of the surrounding shore, you have nearly all the elements needed to create a formula for any situation.

In order to see how nearly I could guess, with this experience, at the deepest point in a pond, by observing the outlines of its surface and the character of its shores alone, I made a plan of White Pond, which contains about forty-one acres, and, like this, has no island in it, nor any visible inlet or outlet; and as the line of greatest breadth fell very near the line of least breadth, where two opposite capes approached each other and two opposite bays receded, I ventured to mark a point a short distance from the latter line, but still on the line of greatest length, as the deepest. The deepest part was found to be within one hundred feet of this, still farther in the direction to which I had inclined, and was only one foot deeper, namely, sixty feet. Of course, a stream running through, or an island in the pond, would make the problem much more complicated.

To see how closely I could guess the deepest part of a pond based only on the surface outlines and shore characteristics, I made a map of White Pond, which is about forty-one acres and has no islands or visible inlets or outlets. The widest point was very close to the narrowest part, where two opposite capes come together and two opposite bays recede. I decided to mark a point slightly away from that line but still on the longest line as the deepest spot. The actual deepest part was found to be within one hundred feet of this point, further in the direction I had guessed, and was only one foot deeper, at sixty feet. Clearly, if there were a stream running through it or an island in the pond, the situation would be much more complicated.

If we knew all the laws of Nature, we should need only one fact, or the description of one actual phenomenon, to infer all the particular results at that point. Now we know only a few laws, and our result is vitiated, not, of course, by any confusion or irregularity in Nature, but by our ignorance of essential elements in the calculation. Our notions of law and harmony are commonly confined to those instances which we detect; but the harmony which results from a far greater number of seemingly conflicting, but really concurring, laws, which we have not detected, is still more wonderful. The particular laws are as our points of view, as, to the traveller, a mountain outline varies with every step, and it has an infinite number of profiles, though absolutely but one form. Even when cleft or bored through it is not comprehended in its entireness.

If we understood all the laws of nature, we would only need one fact or the description of one actual phenomenon to figure out all the specific results at that point. Right now, we only know a few laws, and our conclusions are flawed, not because nature is confusing or irregular, but because we lack knowledge of crucial elements in the calculation. Our ideas about law and harmony are usually limited to the instances we notice; however, the harmony that comes from a much larger number of seemingly conflicting but actually cooperating laws, which we haven't identified, is even more amazing. The specific laws are like our perspectives, just as a mountain's outline changes with every step for a traveler and has countless profiles, despite having only one true form. Even when we cut through or penetrate it, we still can’t grasp its entirety.

What I have observed of the pond is no less true in ethics. It is the law of average. Such a rule of the two diameters not only guides us toward the sun in the system and the heart in man, but draw lines through the length and breadth of the aggregate of a man’s particular daily behaviors and waves of life into his coves and inlets, and where they intersect will be the height or depth of his character. Perhaps we need only to know how his shores trend and his adjacent country or circumstances, to infer his depth and concealed bottom. If he is surrounded by mountainous circumstances, an Achillean shore, whose peaks overshadow and are reflected in his bosom, they suggest a corresponding depth in him. But a low and smooth shore proves him shallow on that side. In our bodies, a bold projecting brow falls off to and indicates a corresponding depth of thought. Also there is a bar across the entrance of our every cove, or particular inclination; each is our harbor for a season, in which we are detained and partially land-locked. These inclinations are not whimsical usually, but their form, size, and direction are determined by the promontories of the shore, the ancient axes of elevation. When this bar is gradually increased by storms, tides, or currents, or there is a subsidence of the waters, so that it reaches to the surface, that which was at first but an inclination in the shore in which a thought was harbored becomes an individual lake, cut off from the ocean, wherein the thought secures its own conditions, changes, perhaps, from salt to fresh, becomes a sweet sea, dead sea, or a marsh. At the advent of each individual into this life, may we not suppose that such a bar has risen to the surface somewhere? It is true, we are such poor navigators that our thoughts, for the most part, stand off and on upon a harborless coast, are conversant only with the bights of the bays of poesy, or steer for the public ports of entry, and go into the dry docks of science, where they merely refit for this world, and no natural currents concur to individualize them.

What I’ve noticed about the pond is just as true in ethics. It’s all about averages. This principle not only directs us toward the sun in our system and the heart in each individual, but it also maps out the range of our daily actions and life’s experiences in their many twists and turns. Where these paths cross will determine the strength or weakness of one’s character. We might only need to understand how a person’s surroundings are structured and their life circumstances to gauge their inner depth and hidden qualities. If someone is surrounded by formidable conditions, like towering mountains that cast shadows and are mirrored in their very being, that suggests they possess a corresponding depth within. However, a flat and smooth terrain indicates shallowness in that regard. In our physical forms, a strong, protruding brow signals corresponding depth of thought. There’s also a barrier at the entrance of every one of our unique inclinations; each serves as a temporary harbor where we are somewhat trapped and confined. These inclinations are usually not random, but their shape, size, and direction are influenced by the prominent features of the landscape, the long-standing elevations. When this barrier is gradually built up by storms, tides, or currents, or the water levels drop to the surface, what was once just an inclination in the landscape becomes a separate lake, isolated from the ocean, where that thought establishes its own environment, possibly shifting from salty to fresh, transforming into a sweet sea, a dead sea, or a marsh. When each person enters this life, can we not assume that such a barrier has emerged somewhere? It’s true, we are often such poor navigators that our thoughts mostly hover near a barren shore, engaging only with the charming edges of poetic bays, or aiming for the common ports of entry, and entering the dry docks of science, where they merely prepare for this world, without any natural currents helping to distinguish them.

As for the inlet or outlet of Walden, I have not discovered any but rain and snow and evaporation, though perhaps, with a thermometer and a line, such places may be found, for where the water flows into the pond it will probably be coldest in summer and warmest in winter. When the ice-men were at work here in ’46–7, the cakes sent to the shore were one day rejected by those who were stacking them up there, not being thick enough to lie side by side with the rest; and the cutters thus discovered that the ice over a small space was two or three inches thinner than elsewhere, which made them think that there was an inlet there. They also showed me in another place what they thought was a “leach hole,” through which the pond leaked out under a hill into a neighboring meadow, pushing me out on a cake of ice to see it. It was a small cavity under ten feet of water; but I think that I can warrant the pond not to need soldering till they find a worse leak than that. One has suggested, that if such a “leach hole” should be found, its connection with the meadow, if any existed, might be proved by conveying some colored powder or sawdust to the mouth of the hole, and then putting a strainer over the spring in the meadow, which would catch some of the particles carried through by the current.

As for the inlet or outlet of Walden, I haven't found any except rain, snow, and evaporation. However, maybe with a thermometer and a line, such spots could be identified because where the water flows into the pond, it’s likely to be the coldest in summer and the warmest in winter. When the ice men were working here in '46–7, the ice cakes they sent to the shore were once turned away by those stacking them because they were too thin to lie alongside the others. This led the cutters to notice that the ice over a small area was two or three inches thinner than the rest, making them think there might be an inlet there. They also showed me another spot that they believed was a “leach hole,” where the pond leaked out under a hill into a nearby meadow, and they pushed me out on a piece of ice to see it. It was a small cavity under ten feet of water; but I think I can assure you that the pond doesn’t need repairs until they find a worse leak than that. One suggestion was that if such a “leach hole” exists, its link to the meadow, if any, could be proven by sending some colored powder or sawdust to the hole and then placing a strainer over the spring in the meadow to catch some of the particles carried through by the current.

While I was surveying, the ice, which was sixteen inches thick, undulated under a slight wind like water. It is well known that a level cannot be used on ice. At one rod from the shore its greatest fluctuation, when observed by means of a level on land directed toward a graduated staff on the ice, was three quarters of an inch, though the ice appeared firmly attached to the shore. It was probably greater in the middle. Who knows but if our instruments were delicate enough we might detect an undulation in the crust of the earth? When two legs of my level were on the shore and the third on the ice, and the sights were directed over the latter, a rise or fall of the ice of an almost infinitesimal amount made a difference of several feet on a tree across the pond. When I began to cut holes for sounding, there were three or four inches of water on the ice under a deep snow which had sunk it thus far; but the water began immediately to run into these holes, and continued to run for two days in deep streams, which wore away the ice on every side, and contributed essentially, if not mainly, to dry the surface of the pond; for, as the water ran in, it raised and floated the ice. This was somewhat like cutting a hole in the bottom of a ship to let the water out. When such holes freeze, and a rain succeeds, and finally a new freezing forms a fresh smooth ice over all, it is beautifully mottled internally by dark figures, shaped somewhat like a spider’s web, what you may call ice rosettes, produced by the channels worn by the water flowing from all sides to a centre. Sometimes, also, when the ice was covered with shallow puddles, I saw a double shadow of myself, one standing on the head of the other, one on the ice, the other on the trees or hill-side.

While I was surveying, the ice, which was sixteen inches thick, rolled gently under a slight wind like water. It’s well known that you can’t use a level on ice. At one rod from the shore, its biggest fluctuation, when observed with a level on land aimed at a graduated staff on the ice, was three-quarters of an inch, even though the ice seemed securely attached to the shore. It was probably greater in the middle. Who knows, if our instruments were sensitive enough, we might detect an undulation in the earth's crust? When two legs of my level were on the shore and the third on the ice, and the sights were aimed over the latter, a rise or fall of the ice, almost unnoticeable, made a difference of several feet on a tree across the pond. When I started to cut holes for sounding, there were three or four inches of water on the ice beneath a thick layer of snow that had compressed it that much; however, the water immediately started to flow into these holes and continued to pour for two days in deep streams, which eroded the ice on all sides and essentially, if not mainly, helped dry the surface of the pond; as the water flowed in, it lifted and floated the ice. This was somewhat like cutting a hole in the bottom of a ship to let the water out. When such holes freeze, and then it rains, and finally, a new freezing creates a fresh smooth layer of ice over everything, it becomes beautifully mottled inside with dark patterns, shaped somewhat like a spider’s web, what you might call ice rosettes, formed by the channels worn by the water flowing from all sides to a center. Sometimes, when the ice was covered with shallow puddles, I saw a double shadow of myself, one standing on the head of the other, one on the ice, the other on the trees or hillside.

While yet it is cold January, and snow and ice are thick and solid, the prudent landlord comes from the village to get ice to cool his summer drink; impressively, even pathetically wise, to foresee the heat and thirst of July now in January,—wearing a thick coat and mittens! when so many things are not provided for. It may be that he lays up no treasures in this world which will cool his summer drink in the next. He cuts and saws the solid pond, unroofs the house of fishes, and carts off their very element and air, held fast by chains and stakes like corded wood, through the favoring winter air, to wintry cellars, to underlie the summer there. It looks like solidified azure, as, far off, it is drawn through the streets. These ice-cutters are a merry race, full of jest and sport, and when I went among them they were wont to invite me to saw pit-fashion with them, I standing underneath.

While it's still cold in January, and snow and ice are thick and solid, the smart landlord comes from the village to get ice to cool his summer drinks; impressively, even somewhat sadly wise, to anticipate the heat and thirst of July back in January—wearing a thick coat and mittens! Meanwhile, many things remain unprepared. He may not be storing up treasures in this world that will cool his summer drinks in the next. He cuts and saws the solid pond, taking away the house of fish and removing their very element and air, tightly bound like firewood, through the frosty winter air, to put them in cold cellars, to be kept for summer. It looks like solid blue as it's drawn through the streets from a distance. These ice-cutters are a cheerful bunch, full of jokes and fun, and when I joined them, they would often invite me to saw with them, with me standing underneath.

In the winter of ’46–7 there came a hundred men of Hyperborean extraction swoop down on to our pond one morning, with many car-loads of ungainly-looking farming tools, sleds, ploughs, drill-barrows, turf-knives, spades, saws, rakes, and each man was armed with a double-pointed pike-staff, such as is not described in the New-England Farmer or the Cultivator. I did not know whether they had come to sow a crop of winter rye, or some other kind of grain recently introduced from Iceland. As I saw no manure, I judged that they meant to skim the land, as I had done, thinking the soil was deep and had lain fallow long enough. They said that a gentleman farmer, who was behind the scenes, wanted to double his money, which, as I understood, amounted to half a million already; but in order to cover each one of his dollars with another, he took off the only coat, ay, the skin itself, of Walden Pond in the midst of a hard winter. They went to work at once, ploughing, harrowing, rolling, furrowing, in admirable order, as if they were bent on making this a model farm; but when I was looking sharp to see what kind of seed they dropped into the furrow, a gang of fellows by my side suddenly began to hook up the virgin mould itself, with a peculiar jerk, clean down to the sand, or rather the water,—for it was a very springy soil,—indeed all the terra firma there was,—and haul it away on sleds, and then I guessed that they must be cutting peat in a bog. So they came and went every day, with a peculiar shriek from the locomotive, from and to some point of the polar regions, as it seemed to me, like a flock of arctic snow-birds. But sometimes Squaw Walden had her revenge, and a hired man, walking behind his team, slipped through a crack in the ground down toward Tartarus, and he who was so brave before suddenly became but the ninth part of a man, almost gave up his animal heat, and was glad to take refuge in my house, and acknowledged that there was some virtue in a stove; or sometimes the frozen soil took a piece of steel out of a ploughshare, or a plough got set in the furrow and had to be cut out.

In the winter of '46–7, a hundred men of Hyperborean descent came rushing down to our pond one morning with loads of awkward-looking farming tools—sleds, plows, wheelbarrows, turf knives, spades, saws, rakes—and each man carried a double-pointed pike staff, something you won’t find in the New England Farmer or the Cultivator. I wasn’t sure if they were planning to plant a crop of winter rye or some other kind of grain that had recently come from Iceland. Since I saw no manure, I figured they intended to skim the land like I did, believing the soil was deep enough and had rested long enough. They mentioned that a wealthy gentleman farmer, who was working in the background, wanted to double his investment, which, from what I gathered, was already half a million; but to double each dollar, he stripped the only coat—yes, the very skin—of Walden Pond in the middle of a harsh winter. They got to work right away, plowing, harrowing, rolling, furrowing, in perfect order, as if they were determined to make this a model farm; but while I was intently watching to see what kind of seed they dropped into the furrows, a group of guys next to me suddenly started yanking up the untouched soil itself with a strange jerk, pulling it all the way down to the sand, or more accurately, to the water—since it was very springy soil—indeed all the terra firma there was—and hauling it away on sleds, and then I realized they must be cutting peat in a bog. They came and went every day, with an odd shriek from the locomotive, heading to some point in the polar regions, like a flock of arctic snowbirds. But sometimes, Squaw Walden had her revenge, and a hired man walking behind his team slipped through a crack in the ground heading toward Tartarus, and he who had seemed so brave before suddenly became barely a man, almost losing his body heat, and was grateful to take refuge in my house, admitting that there was some benefit to a stove; or sometimes the frozen ground would rip a piece of steel out of a plowshare, or a plow would get stuck in the furrow and had to be cut out.

To speak literally, a hundred Irishmen, with Yankee overseers, came from Cambridge every day to get out the ice. They divided it into cakes by methods too well known to require description, and these, being sledded to the shore, were rapidly hauled off on to an ice platform, and raised by grappling irons and block and tackle, worked by horses, on to a stack, as surely as so many barrels of flour, and there placed evenly side by side, and row upon row, as if they formed the solid base of an obelisk designed to pierce the clouds. They told me that in a good day they could get out a thousand tons, which was the yield of about one acre. Deep ruts and “cradle holes” were worn in the ice, as on terra firma, by the passage of the sleds over the same track, and the horses invariably ate their oats out of cakes of ice hollowed out like buckets. They stacked up the cakes thus in the open air in a pile thirty-five feet high on one side and six or seven rods square, putting hay between the outside layers to exclude the air; for when the wind, though never so cold, finds a passage through, it will wear large cavities, leaving slight supports or studs only here and there, and finally topple it down. At first it looked like a vast blue fort or Valhalla; but when they began to tuck the coarse meadow hay into the crevices, and this became covered with rime and icicles, it looked like a venerable moss-grown and hoary ruin, built of azure-tinted marble, the abode of Winter, that old man we see in the almanac,—his shanty, as if he had a design to estivate with us. They calculated that not twenty-five per cent of this would reach its destination, and that two or three per cent would be wasted in the cars. However, a still greater part of this heap had a different destiny from what was intended; for, either because the ice was found not to keep so well as was expected, containing more air than usual, or for some other reason, it never got to market. This heap, made in the winter of ’46–7 and estimated to contain ten thousand tons, was finally covered with hay and boards; and though it was unroofed the following July, and a part of it carried off, the rest remaining exposed to the sun, it stood over that summer and the next winter, and was not quite melted till September 1848. Thus the pond recovered the greater part.

To put it simply, a hundred Irishmen, along with American overseers, came from Cambridge every day to harvest the ice. They cut it into blocks using well-known methods that don’t need explaining, and these were sledded to the shore, then quickly loaded onto an ice platform. They were lifted with grappling hooks and block and tackle, operated by horses, onto a stack, just like barrels of flour, and arranged neatly side by side in rows, as if they were the solid foundation of an obelisk meant to reach the sky. They told me that on a good day they could harvest a thousand tons, which came from about one acre of ice. Deep ruts and “cradle holes” were made in the ice, just like on solid ground, from the sleds repeatedly traveling the same path, and the horses always ate their oats from blocks of ice carved out like buckets. They piled the blocks outdoors to a height of thirty-five feet on one side and six or seven rods square, placing hay between the outer layers to keep out the air; for when the wind, no matter how cold, finds a way in, it will create large cavities, leaving only a few small supports here and there, and eventually cause it to collapse. At first, it resembled a massive blue fortress or Valhalla; but when they started stuffing coarse meadow hay into the gaps, and it became coated with frost and icicles, it resembled an ancient, moss-covered ruin made of blue-tinted marble, the dwelling of Winter, that old man we see in the calendar—his shelter, as if he intended to hibernate here with us. They estimated that not more than twenty-five percent of this would actually reach its destination and that two or three percent would be lost during transport. However, an even larger portion of this pile had a different fate than planned; either because the ice turned out not to stay frozen as well as expected, containing more air than usual, or for some other reason, it never made it to market. This pile, created in the winter of ‘46-’47 and thought to hold ten thousand tons, was ultimately covered with hay and boards; and although it was left uncovered the following July, and some of it was taken away, the rest remained exposed to the sun. It lasted through that summer and the next winter, melting only in September 1848. Thus, the pond regained most of it.

Like the water, the Walden ice, seen near at hand, has a green tint, but at a distance is beautifully blue, and you can easily tell it from the white ice of the river, or the merely greenish ice of some ponds, a quarter of a mile off. Sometimes one of those great cakes slips from the ice-man’s sled into the village street, and lies there for a week like a great emerald, an object of interest to all passers. I have noticed that a portion of Walden which in the state of water was green will often, when frozen, appear from the same point of view blue. So the hollows about this pond will, sometimes, in the winter, be filled with a greenish water somewhat like its own, but the next day will have frozen blue. Perhaps the blue color of water and ice is due to the light and air they contain, and the most transparent is the bluest. Ice is an interesting subject for contemplation. They told me that they had some in the ice-houses at Fresh Pond five years old which was as good as ever. Why is it that a bucket of water soon becomes putrid, but frozen remains sweet forever? It is commonly said that this is the difference between the affections and the intellect.

Like the water, the Walden ice, when viewed up close, has a green tint, but from a distance, it appears beautifully blue. You can easily distinguish it from the white ice of the river or the somewhat greenish ice of some ponds a quarter of a mile away. Sometimes, one of those large ice slabs slips off the ice-man’s sled into the village street and stays there for a week like a huge emerald, attracting the interest of everyone who passes by. I've noticed that a section of Walden that looks green when it's water often appears blue when frozen, viewed from the same angle. In winter, the depressions around the pond may sometimes contain greenish water similar to its own, but the next day, they might freeze as blue. Maybe the blue color of water and ice comes from the light and air they hold, and the most transparent ones are the bluest. Ice is a fascinating subject to think about. They told me they had some five-year-old ice in the ice houses at Fresh Pond that was just as good as ever. Why is it that a bucket of water quickly becomes foul, but ice stays fresh forever? People often say this reflects the difference between feelings and intellect.

Thus for sixteen days I saw from my window a hundred men at work like busy husbandmen, with teams and horses and apparently all the implements of farming, such a picture as we see on the first page of the almanac; and as often as I looked out I was reminded of the fable of the lark and the reapers, or the parable of the sower, and the like; and now they are all gone, and in thirty days more, probably, I shall look from the same window on the pure sea-green Walden water there, reflecting the clouds and the trees, and sending up its evaporations in solitude, and no traces will appear that a man has ever stood there. Perhaps I shall hear a solitary loon laugh as he dives and plumes himself, or shall see a lonely fisher in his boat, like a floating leaf, beholding his form reflected in the waves, where lately a hundred men securely labored.

So for sixteen days, I watched from my window as a hundred men worked like busy farmers, with teams of horses and seemingly all the tools of agriculture—just like the scene we see on the first page of the almanac. Every time I looked out, I was reminded of the fable of the lark and the reapers, or the parable of the sower, and similar stories. Now they are all gone, and in about thirty days, I’ll probably look from the same window at the clear, green water of Walden, reflecting the clouds and trees, sending up its vapor in solitude, with no signs left that anyone has ever stood there. Maybe I’ll hear a lone loon laugh as it dives and preens itself, or see a solitary fisherman in his boat, drifting like a floating leaf, seeing his reflection in the waves, where just recently a hundred men worked diligently.

Thus it appears that the sweltering inhabitants of Charleston and New Orleans, of Madras and Bombay and Calcutta, drink at my well. In the morning I bathe my intellect in the stupendous and cosmogonal philosophy of the Bhagvat Geeta, since whose composition years of the gods have elapsed, and in comparison with which our modern world and its literature seem puny and trivial; and I doubt if that philosophy is not to be referred to a previous state of existence, so remote is its sublimity from our conceptions. I lay down the book and go to my well for water, and lo! there I meet the servant of the Bramin, priest of Brahma and Vishnu and Indra, who still sits in his temple on the Ganges reading the Vedas, or dwells at the root of a tree with his crust and water jug. I meet his servant come to draw water for his master, and our buckets as it were grate together in the same well. The pure Walden water is mingled with the sacred water of the Ganges. With favoring winds it is wafted past the site of the fabulous islands of Atlantis and the Hesperides, makes the periplus of Hanno, and, floating by Ternate and Tidore and the mouth of the Persian Gulf, melts in the tropic gales of the Indian seas, and is landed in ports of which Alexander only heard the names.

It seems that the hot residents of Charleston and New Orleans, as well as those in Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta, draw from my well. In the morning, I immerse my mind in the incredible and cosmic philosophy of the Bhagavad Gita, which has existed for ages, and compared to it, our modern world and its literature seem small and insignificant. I wonder if that philosophy can't be traced back to an earlier existence, given how distant its greatness feels from our understanding. I put down the book and head to my well for water, and there I encounter the servant of the Brahmin, the priest of Brahma, Vishnu, and Indra, who still sits in his temple by the Ganges, reading the Vedas, or resting at the base of a tree with his simple food and water jug. I meet his servant, who has come to fetch water for his master, and our buckets, in a way, clink together in the same well. The pure water of Walden mixes with the sacred water of the Ganges. With the wind at my back, it drifts past the legendary islands of Atlantis and the Hesperides, follows the journey of Hanno, and, floating by Ternate and Tidore and the entrance to the Persian Gulf, dissolves in the tropical breezes of the Indian seas, reaching ports that Alexander only ever heard about.

Spring

The opening of large tracts by the ice-cutters commonly causes a pond to break up earlier; for the water, agitated by the wind, even in cold weather, wears away the surrounding ice. But such was not the effect on Walden that year, for she had soon got a thick new garment to take the place of the old. This pond never breaks up so soon as the others in this neighborhood, on account both of its greater depth and its having no stream passing through it to melt or wear away the ice. I never knew it to open in the course of a winter, not excepting that of ’52–3, which gave the ponds so severe a trial. It commonly opens about the first of April, a week or ten days later than Flint’s Pond and Fair-Haven, beginning to melt on the north side and in the shallower parts where it began to freeze. It indicates better than any water hereabouts the absolute progress of the season, being least affected by transient changes of temperature. A severe cold of a few days’ duration in March may very much retard the opening of the former ponds, while the temperature of Walden increases almost uninterruptedly. A thermometer thrust into the middle of Walden on the 6th of March, 1847, stood at 32°, or freezing point; near the shore at 33°; in the middle of Flint’s Pond, the same day, at 32½°; at a dozen rods from the shore, in shallow water, under ice a foot thick, at 36°. This difference of three and a half degrees between the temperature of the deep water and the shallow in the latter pond, and the fact that a great proportion of it is comparatively shallow, show why it should break up so much sooner than Walden. The ice in the shallowest part was at this time several inches thinner than in the middle. In mid-winter the middle had been the warmest and the ice thinnest there. So, also, every one who has waded about the shores of the pond in summer must have perceived how much warmer the water is close to the shore, where only three or four inches deep, than a little distance out, and on the surface where it is deep, than near the bottom. In spring the sun not only exerts an influence through the increased temperature of the air and earth, but its heat passes through ice a foot or more thick, and is reflected from the bottom in shallow water, and so also warms the water and melts the under side of the ice, at the same time that it is melting it more directly above, making it uneven, and causing the air bubbles which it contains to extend themselves upward and downward until it is completely honeycombed, and at last disappears suddenly in a single spring rain. Ice has its grain as well as wood, and when a cake begins to rot or “comb,” that is, assume the appearance of honey-comb, whatever may be its position, the air cells are at right angles with what was the water surface. Where there is a rock or a log rising near to the surface the ice over it is much thinner, and is frequently quite dissolved by this reflected heat; and I have been told that in the experiment at Cambridge to freeze water in a shallow wooden pond, though the cold air circulated underneath, and so had access to both sides, the reflection of the sun from the bottom more than counterbalanced this advantage. When a warm rain in the middle of the winter melts off the snow-ice from Walden, and leaves a hard dark or transparent ice on the middle, there will be a strip of rotten though thicker white ice, a rod or more wide, about the shores, created by this reflected heat. Also, as I have said, the bubbles themselves within the ice operate as burning-glasses to melt the ice beneath.

The opening of large areas by the ice-cutters usually makes a pond break up earlier because the wind-stirred water, even in cold weather, erodes the surrounding ice. However, that wasn't the case with Walden that year, as it quickly got a thick new layer to replace the old one. This pond typically doesn't break up as soon as others in the area due to its greater depth and the fact that there's no stream flowing through it to melt or erode the ice. I've never seen it open during winter, not even in '52–3, which was particularly tough on the ponds. It usually opens around the first of April, about a week to ten days later than Flint’s Pond and Fair-Haven, starting to thaw on the north side and in the shallower areas where it froze first. It better reflects the true progress of the season compared to any other local water, as it's less affected by temporary temperature changes. A few days of severe cold in March can significantly delay the opening of the other ponds, while Walden’s temperature rises almost consistently. On March 6, 1847, a thermometer placed in the middle of Walden read 32° (freezing point) and near the shore at 33°; meanwhile, in the middle of Flint’s Pond the same day, it was at 32½°, and a dozen rods from the shore, in shallow water with a foot of ice, it was at 36°. This 3.5-degree difference between the deep and shallow water temperatures in Flint’s Pond, along with the fact that a large portion of it is relatively shallow, explains why it breaks up much sooner than Walden. The ice in the shallowest area was several inches thinner than in the middle. During mid-winter, the middle was the warmest, with the thinnest ice there as well. Anyone who has waded along the shores of the pond in summer has noticed how much warmer the water is close to the shore, where it’s only three or four inches deep, compared to just a little further out, and on the surface where it’s deep, than near the bottom. In spring, the sun not only impacts the temperature of the air and ground, but its heat can penetrate ice over a foot thick, reflecting off the bottom in shallow water. This warms the water and melts the underside of the ice while also causing more direct melting above, making the ice uneven and allowing air bubbles within it to expand upward and downward until it is completely honeycombed, and then suddenly disappears during a spring rain. Ice has its own grain like wood, and when a block begins to rot or “comb,” taking on a honeycomb appearance, regardless of its position, the air cells align at right angles to what was the water surface. Where there’s a rock or log close to the surface, the ice above it is much thinner and often completely melts from this reflected heat. I’ve also heard that in an experiment at Cambridge to freeze water in a shallow wooden pond, even though cold air circulated underneath and accessed both sides, the sun’s reflection from the bottom more than made up for that. When a warm rain in the middle of winter melts the snow-ice from Walden, it leaves a hard, dark, or transparent ice in the center, while around the edges there will be a strip of rotten yet thicker white ice that’s a rod or more wide, created by this reflected heat. Additionally, as I mentioned, the bubbles within the ice act like magnifying glasses to help melt the ice below.

The phenomena of the year take place every day in a pond on a small scale. Every morning, generally speaking, the shallow water is being warmed more rapidly than the deep, though it may not be made so warm after all, and every evening it is being cooled more rapidly until the morning. The day is an epitome of the year. The night is the winter, the morning and evening are the spring and fall, and the noon is the summer. The cracking and booming of the ice indicate a change of temperature. One pleasant morning after a cold night, February 24th, 1850, having gone to Flint’s Pond to spend the day, I noticed with surprise, that when I struck the ice with the head of my axe, it resounded like a gong for many rods around, or as if I had struck on a tight drum-head. The pond began to boom about an hour after sunrise, when it felt the influence of the sun’s rays slanted upon it from over the hills; it stretched itself and yawned like a waking man with a gradually increasing tumult, which was kept up three or four hours. It took a short siesta at noon, and boomed once more toward night, as the sun was withdrawing his influence. In the right stage of the weather a pond fires its evening gun with great regularity. But in the middle of the day, being full of cracks, and the air also being less elastic, it had completely lost its resonance, and probably fishes and muskrats could not then have been stunned by a blow on it. The fishermen say that the “thundering of the pond” scares the fishes and prevents their biting. The pond does not thunder every evening, and I cannot tell surely when to expect its thundering; but though I may perceive no difference in the weather, it does. Who would have suspected so large and cold and thick-skinned a thing to be so sensitive? Yet it has its law to which it thunders obedience when it should as surely as the buds expand in the spring. The earth is all alive and covered with papillæ. The largest pond is as sensitive to atmospheric changes as the globule of mercury in its tube.

The events of the year happen every day in a pond on a small scale. Every morning, in general, the shallow water warms up faster than the deep water, although it might not actually get that warm, and every evening it cools down more quickly until the morning. The day reflects the year. The night represents winter, while morning and evening symbolize spring and fall, and noon represents summer. The cracking and booming of the ice signal a change in temperature. One pleasant morning after a cold night, on February 24th, 1850, I went to Flint’s Pond to spend the day and was surprised to notice that when I struck the ice with the head of my axe, it echoed like a gong for several yards around, similar to hitting a tight drumhead. The pond started to boom about an hour after sunrise when it felt the sun's rays hitting it from over the hills; it stretched itself and yawned like a waking man, creating a gradually increasing noise that lasted three or four hours. It took a short nap at noon and boomed again toward evening as the sun's influence faded. Under the right weather conditions, a pond will regularly make its evening noise. But in the middle of the day, being full of cracks and with the air being less elastic, it completely lost its resonance, and probably fish and muskrats wouldn't have been stunned by a blow on it. Fishermen say that the “thundering of the pond” scares the fish and keeps them from biting. The pond doesn’t thunder every evening, and I can’t say for sure when it will; but even if I don’t notice any change in the weather, it does. Who would have thought such a large, cold, and tough thing could be so sensitive? Yet it follows its own rules and thunders in response just as surely as buds bloom in the spring. The earth is alive and full of sensations. The largest pond is just as responsive to changes in the atmosphere as a droplet of mercury in a tube.

One attraction in coming to the woods to live was that I should have leisure and opportunity to see the spring come in. The ice in the pond at length begins to be honey-combed, and I can set my heel in it as I walk. Fogs and rains and warmer suns are gradually melting the snow; the days have grown sensibly longer; and I see how I shall get through the winter without adding to my wood-pile, for large fires are no longer necessary. I am on the alert for the first signs of spring, to hear the chance note of some arriving bird, or the striped squirrel’s chirp, for his stores must be now nearly exhausted, or see the woodchuck venture out of his winter quarters. On the 13th of March, after I had heard the bluebird, song-sparrow, and red-wing, the ice was still nearly a foot thick. As the weather grew warmer it was not sensibly worn away by the water, nor broken up and floated off as in rivers, but, though it was completely melted for half a rod in width about the shore, the middle was merely honey-combed and saturated with water, so that you could put your foot through it when six inches thick; but by the next day evening, perhaps, after a warm rain followed by fog, it would have wholly disappeared, all gone off with the fog, spirited away. One year I went across the middle only five days before it disappeared entirely. In 1845 Walden was first completely open on the 1st of April; in ’46, the 25th of March; in ’47, the 8th of April; in ’51, the 28th of March; in ’52, the 18th of April; in ’53, the 23d of March; in ’54, about the 7th of April.

One reason I was drawn to living in the woods was that I would have the time and chance to see spring arrive. The ice on the pond is finally starting to crack, and I can step on it as I walk. Fogs, rains, and warmer sun are slowly melting the snow; the days are noticeably getting longer, and I realize I can get through the winter without having to add to my woodpile since big fires aren’t needed anymore. I'm keeping an eye out for the first signs of spring, waiting to hear the occasional call of some returning bird or the striped squirrel's chirp, since his food stash must be almost gone, or to see the woodchuck come out of hibernation. On March 13th, after I had heard the bluebird, song sparrow, and red-wing, the ice was still nearly a foot thick. As the weather warmed up, it didn’t wear away noticeably from the water, nor did it break up and float away like it does in rivers, but while it was completely melted for about half a rod along the shore, the middle was just honeycombed and soaked with water, so you could go through it even when it was six inches thick; but by the next evening, perhaps after a warm rain followed by fog, it would completely vanish, all gone with the fog, spirited away. One year I walked across the middle just five days before it was totally gone. In 1845, Walden was first fully open on April 1st; in ’46, on March 25th; in ’47, on April 8th; in ’51, on March 28th; in ’52, on April 18th; in ’53, on March 23rd; in ’54, around April 7th.

Every incident connected with the breaking up of the rivers and ponds and the settling of the weather is particularly interesting to us who live in a climate of so great extremes. When the warmer days come, they who dwell near the river hear the ice crack at night with a startling whoop as loud as artillery, as if its icy fetters were rent from end to end, and within a few days see it rapidly going out. So the alligator comes out of the mud with quakings of the earth. One old man, who has been a close observer of Nature, and seems as thoroughly wise in regard to all her operations as if she had been put upon the stocks when he was a boy, and he had helped to lay her keel,—who has come to his growth, and can hardly acquire more of natural lore if he should live to the age of Methuselah,—told me, and I was surprised to hear him express wonder at any of Nature’s operations, for I thought that there were no secrets between them, that one spring day he took his gun and boat, and thought that he would have a little sport with the ducks. There was ice still on the meadows, but it was all gone out of the river, and he dropped down without obstruction from Sudbury, where he lived, to Fair-Haven Pond, which he found, unexpectedly, covered for the most part with a firm field of ice. It was a warm day, and he was surprised to see so great a body of ice remaining. Not seeing any ducks, he hid his boat on the north or back side of an island in the pond, and then concealed himself in the bushes on the south side, to await them. The ice was melted for three or four rods from the shore, and there was a smooth and warm sheet of water, with a muddy bottom, such as the ducks love, within, and he thought it likely that some would be along pretty soon. After he had lain still there about an hour he heard a low and seemingly very distant sound, but singularly grand and impressive, unlike any thing he had ever heard, gradually swelling and increasing as if it would have a universal and memorable ending, a sullen rush and roar, which seemed to him all at once like the sound of a vast body of fowl coming in to settle there, and, seizing his gun, he started up in haste and excited; but he found, to his surprise, that the whole body of the ice had started while he lay there, and drifted in to the shore, and the sound he had heard was made by its edge grating on the shore,—at first gently nibbled and crumbled off, but at length heaving up and scattering its wrecks along the island to a considerable height before it came to a stand still.

Every event related to the breaking up of rivers and ponds and the changing of the weather is especially interesting to us who live in an area with such extreme climates. When the warmer days arrive, those living near the river hear the ice crack at night with a loud sound like artillery, as if its icy bonds were bursting apart, and within a few days, they see it quickly breaking up. Similarly, the alligator emerges from the mud with tremors in the ground. One old man, a keen observer of Nature, seems incredibly knowledgeable about her workings, as if she had been built while he was a boy and he had helped to construct her; he has reached a level of understanding that he could hardly add to even if he lived as long as Methuselah. He told me, and I was surprised to hear him express amazement at any of Nature’s actions, considering that I thought they shared no secrets. One spring day, he took his gun and boat, thinking he might have some fun hunting ducks. There was still ice in the meadows, but it was all gone from the river, and he floated down smoothly from Sudbury, where he lived, to Fair-Haven Pond, which he found mostly covered with a solid sheet of ice. It was a warm day, and he was surprised to see such a large expanse of ice still there. Not seeing any ducks, he hid his boat on the north or back side of an island in the pond and then concealed himself in the bushes on the south side, waiting for them. The ice had melted for three or four rods from the shore, revealing a smooth, warm sheet of water with a muddy bottom, just what the ducks love, so he thought they might show up soon. After lying still for about an hour, he heard a low, seemingly distant sound, yet it was strangely grand and impressive, unlike anything he had ever heard before. It grew louder and seemed to build up to a universal and memorable climax—a deep roar that suddenly reminded him of a vast flock of birds coming to settle there. Seizing his gun, he jumped up in excitement, only to find that the entire mass of ice had moved while he lay there, drifting towards the shore. The sound he had heard came from the edge of the ice grinding against the shore—initially gently nibbling and crumbling, but eventually pushing up and scattering its remnants along the island to a significant height before coming to a stop.

At length the sun’s rays have attained the right angle, and warm winds blow up mist and rain and melt the snow banks, and the sun dispersing the mist smiles on a checkered landscape of russet and white smoking with incense, through which the traveller picks his way from islet to islet, cheered by the music of a thousand tinkling rills and rivulets whose veins are filled with the blood of winter which they are bearing off.

Finally, the sun's rays have hit just the right angle, and warm winds are lifting mist and rain and melting the snow piles. The sun breaks through the mist, shining down on a patchwork landscape of browns and whites, giving off a fragrant steam. As the traveler navigates from one little island of land to another, he is uplifted by the sounds of numerous sparkling streams and brooks, which are carrying away the remnants of winter.

Few phenomena gave me more delight than to observe the forms which thawing sand and clay assume in flowing down the sides of a deep cut on the railroad through which I passed on my way to the village, a phenomenon not very common on so large a scale, though the number of freshly exposed banks of the right material must have been greatly multiplied since railroads were invented. The material was sand of every degree of fineness and of various rich colors, commonly mixed with a little clay. When the frost comes out in the spring, and even in a thawing day in the winter, the sand begins to flow down the slopes like lava, sometimes bursting out through the snow and overflowing it where no sand was to be seen before. Innumerable little streams overlap and interlace one with another, exhibiting a sort of hybrid product, which obeys half way the law of currents, and half way that of vegetation. As it flows it takes the forms of sappy leaves or vines, making heaps of pulpy sprays a foot or more in depth, and resembling, as you look down on them, the laciniated, lobed, and imbricated thalluses of some lichens; or you are reminded of coral, of leopard’s paws or birds’ feet, of brains or lungs or bowels, and excrements of all kinds. It is a truly grotesque vegetation, whose forms and color we see imitated in bronze, a sort of architectural foliage more ancient and typical than acanthus, chiccory, ivy, vine, or any vegetable leaves; destined perhaps, under some circumstances, to become a puzzle to future geologists. The whole cut impressed me as if it were a cave with its stalactites laid open to the light. The various shades of the sand are singularly rich and agreeable, embracing the different iron colors, brown, gray, yellowish, and reddish. When the flowing mass reaches the drain at the foot of the bank it spreads out flatter into strands, the separate streams losing their semi-cylindrical form and gradually becoming more flat and broad, running together as they are more moist, till they form an almost flat sand, still variously and beautifully shaded, but in which you can trace the original forms of vegetation; till at length, in the water itself, they are converted into banks, like those formed off the mouths of rivers, and the forms of vegetation are lost in the ripple marks on the bottom.

Few things brought me as much joy as watching the shapes that melting sand and clay take as they flow down the steep sides of a railroad cut on my way to the village. This isn't a common sight on such a large scale, even though the number of freshly exposed banks of the right material has certainly increased since railroads were created. The material is sand of varying fineness and rich colors, often mixed with some clay. When the frost melts in the spring, and even on thawing winter days, the sand begins to flow down the slopes like lava, sometimes breaking through the snow and spilling out where there was no sand before. Countless little streams overlap and weave into each other, creating a mixed product that bends to the rules of both water flow and plant life. As it moves, it takes on the shapes of leafy greens or vines, forming piles of wet sprays that are a foot or more deep, and from above, it resembles the lobed and layered forms of some lichens; or it reminds you of coral, leopard spots, bird feet, brains, lungs, or all kinds of waste. It’s truly a grotesque kind of vegetation, with shapes and colors that we see reflected in bronze, a form of architectural foliage that feels more ancient and typical than acanthus, chicory, ivy, vine, or any other plant leaves; potentially, under certain conditions, it could baffle future geologists. The whole cut reminded me of a cave with its stalactites exposed to the light. The various shades of sand are surprisingly rich and pleasant, including shades of iron colors: brown, gray, yellowish, and reddish. When the flowing mass reaches the drainage at the bottom of the bank, it spreads out into strands, with the individual streams losing their rounded shapes and gradually becoming flatter and wider, merging together as they get wetter, until they form an almost flat sand, still displaying beautiful and varied shades, but where you can trace the original shapes of vegetation; eventually, in the water itself, they turn into banks, similar to those formed at river mouths, and the plant shapes fade away into the ripples on the bottom.

The whole bank, which is from twenty to forty feet high, is sometimes overlaid with a mass of this kind of foliage, or sandy rupture, for a quarter of a mile on one or both sides, the produce of one spring day. What makes this sand foliage remarkable is its springing into existence thus suddenly. When I see on the one side the inert bank,—for the sun acts on one side first,—and on the other this luxuriant foliage, the creation of an hour, I am affected as if in a peculiar sense I stood in the laboratory of the Artist who made the world and me,—had come to where he was still at work, sporting on this bank, and with excess of energy strewing his fresh designs about. I feel as if I were nearer to the vitals of the globe, for this sandy overflow is something such a foliaceous mass as the vitals of the animal body. You find thus in the very sands an anticipation of the vegetable leaf. No wonder that the earth expresses itself outwardly in leaves, it so labors with the idea inwardly. The atoms have already learned this law, and are pregnant by it. The overhanging leaf sees here its prototype. Internally, whether in the globe or animal body, it is a moist thick lobe, a word especially applicable to the liver and lungs and the leaves of fat, (λείβω, labor, lapsus, to flow or slip downward, a lapsing; λοβος, globus, lobe, globe; also lap, flap, and many other words,) externally a dry thin leaf, even as the f and v are a pressed and dried b. The radicals of lobe are lb, the soft mass of the b (single lobed, or B, double lobed,) with the liquid l behind it pressing it forward. In globe, glb, the guttural g adds to the meaning the capacity of the throat. The feathers and wings of birds are still drier and thinner leaves. Thus, also, you pass from the lumpish grub in the earth to the airy and fluttering butterfly. The very globe continually transcends and translates itself, and becomes winged in its orbit. Even ice begins with delicate crystal leaves, as if it had flowed into moulds which the fronds of water plants have impressed on the watery mirror. The whole tree itself is but one leaf, and rivers are still vaster leaves whose pulp is intervening earth, and towns and cities are the ova of insects in their axils.

The entire bank, which is twenty to forty feet high, is sometimes covered with a mass of this type of foliage or sandy break, stretching for a quarter of a mile on one or both sides, all produced in just one spring day. What makes this sand foliage special is how suddenly it appears. When I look at the inert bank on one side—the sun warms that side first—and then see the lush foliage on the other side, created in just an hour, I feel as if I'm standing in the workshop of the Artist who created the world and me, right where he’s still at work, playfully spreading his fresh designs around. I feel closer to the heart of the earth because this sandy overflow resembles the vital tissues of a living organism. In the grains of sand, you can sense a preview of a plant leaf. It’s no surprise that the earth expresses itself in leaves—it’s working hard with that idea internally. The atoms have already grasped this law and are infused with it. The overhanging leaf sees its prototype here. Internally, whether in the earth or a living body, it’s a moist thick lobe, a term especially fitting for the liver, lungs, and the leaves of fat, (λείβω, labor, lapsus, to flow or slip downward, a lapsing; λοβος, globus, lobe, globe; also lap, flap, and many other words,) externally a dry thin leaf, just as the f and v are a pressed and dried b. The roots of lobe are lb, the soft mass of the b (single lobed, or B, double lobed), with the liquid l behind it pushing it forward. In globe, glb, the guttural g adds to the meaning the capacity of the throat. The feathers and wings of birds are even drier and thinner leaves. Thus, you move from the heavy caterpillar in the ground to the light and fluttering butterfly. The very globe continually transforms itself, becoming winged in its orbit. Even ice starts with delicate crystal leaves, as if it had flowed into molds shaped by the fronds of water plants on the watery surface. The entire tree is just one leaf, and rivers are vast leaves whose pulp consists of the intervening earth, with towns and cities being the ova of insects nestled in their axils.

When the sun withdraws the sand ceases to flow, but in the morning the streams will start once more and branch and branch again into a myriad of others. You here see perchance how blood vessels are formed. If you look closely you observe that first there pushes forward from the thawing mass a stream of softened sand with a drop-like point, like the ball of the finger, feeling its way slowly and blindly downward, until at last with more heat and moisture, as the sun gets higher, the most fluid portion, in its effort to obey the law to which the most inert also yields, separates from the latter and forms for itself a meandering channel or artery within that, in which is seen a little silvery stream glancing like lightning from one stage of pulpy leaves or branches to another, and ever and anon swallowed up in the sand. It is wonderful how rapidly yet perfectly the sand organizes itself as it flows, using the best material its mass affords to form the sharp edges of its channel. Such are the sources of rivers. In the silicious matter which the water deposits is perhaps the bony system, and in the still finer soil and organic matter the fleshy fibre or cellular tissue. What is man but a mass of thawing clay? The ball of the human finger is but a drop congealed. The fingers and toes flow to their extent from the thawing mass of the body. Who knows what the human body would expand and flow out to under a more genial heaven? Is not the hand a spreading palm leaf with its lobes and veins? The ear may be regarded, fancifully, as a lichen, umbilicaria, on the side of the head, with its lobe or drop. The lip—labium, from labor (?)—laps or lapses from the sides of the cavernous mouth. The nose is a manifest congealed drop or stalactite. The chin is a still larger drop, the confluent dripping of the face. The cheeks are a slide from the brows into the valley of the face, opposed and diffused by the cheek bones. Each rounded lobe of the vegetable leaf, too, is a thick and now loitering drop, larger or smaller; the lobes are the fingers of the leaf; and as many lobes as it has, in so many directions it tends to flow, and more heat or other genial influences would have caused it to flow yet farther.

When the sun sets, the sand stops moving, but in the morning, the streams will start flowing again and splitting off into countless others. Here, you can see how blood vessels form. If you look closely, you'll notice that first, a stream of softened sand pushes forward from the melting mass, with a droplet-like tip, like the tip of a finger, feeling its way down slowly and blindly until, with more heat and moisture as the sun rises, the most fluid portion, trying to follow the same laws as the more solid part, separates and creates a winding channel or artery, where you can see a little silvery stream sparkling like lightning, jumping from one pulpy leaf or branch to another, and now and then getting swallowed up by the sand. It's amazing how quickly yet perfectly the sand organizes itself as it flows, using the best material available to create the sharp edges of its channel. This is how rivers begin. In the silicate matter that the water leaves behind, there might be a skeletal system, and in the even finer soil and organic matter, the fleshy fibers or cellular tissue. What is man but a mass of melting clay? The tip of the human finger is just a solidified droplet. The fingers and toes extend out from the melting mass of the body. Who knows how the human body would expand and flow under a warmer sky? Isn't the hand like a spreading palm leaf with its lobes and veins? The ear could be imagined, whimsically, as a lichen, umbilicaria, on the side of the head, with its lobe or droplet. The lip—labium, from labor (?)—laps or flows from the sides of the cavernous mouth. The nose is clearly a solidified droplet or a stalactite. The chin is a larger droplet, the merging drip of the face. The cheeks slide from the brows into the valley of the face, shaped and softened by the cheekbones. Each rounded lobe of a vegetable leaf is also a thick, now lingering droplet, larger or smaller; the lobes represent the fingers of the leaf; and for each lobe it has, it tends to flow in that many directions, and more heat or other gentle influences would have made it flow even further.

Thus it seemed that this one hillside illustrated the principle of all the operations of Nature. The Maker of this earth but patented a leaf. What Champollion will decipher this hieroglyphic for us, that we may turn over a new leaf at last? This phenomenon is more exhilarating to me than the luxuriance and fertility of vineyards. True, it is somewhat excrementitious in its character, and there is no end to the heaps of liver lights and bowels, as if the globe were turned wrong side outward; but this suggests at least that Nature has some bowels, and there again is mother of humanity. This is the frost coming out of the ground; this is Spring. It precedes the green and flowery spring, as mythology precedes regular poetry. I know of nothing more purgative of winter fumes and indigestions. It convinces me that Earth is still in her swaddling clothes, and stretches forth baby fingers on every side. Fresh curls spring from the baldest brow. There is nothing inorganic. These foliaceous heaps lie along the bank like the slag of a furnace, showing that Nature is “in full blast” within. The earth is not a mere fragment of dead history, stratum upon stratum like the leaves of a book, to be studied by geologists and antiquaries chiefly, but living poetry like the leaves of a tree, which precede flowers and fruit,—not a fossil earth, but a living earth; compared with whose great central life all animal and vegetable life is merely parasitic. Its throes will heave our exuviæ from their graves. You may melt your metals and cast them into the most beautiful moulds you can; they will never excite me like the forms which this molten earth flows out into. And not only it, but the institutions upon it, are plastic like clay in the hands of the potter.

So it seems that this one hillside represents the principle behind all of Nature's operations. The Creator of this earth just patented a leaf. Which Champollion will decipher this hieroglyph for us, allowing us to finally turn over a new leaf? This phenomenon excites me more than the lushness and fertility of vineyards. True, it does have a somewhat messy aspect, and there are endless piles of liver, lights, and intestines, as if the globe were turned inside out; but this at least suggests that Nature has some insides, which ties back to humanity. This is the frost coming up from the ground; this is Spring. It comes before the green and flowering spring, similar to how mythology comes before regular poetry. I can’t think of anything better at purging winter fumes and indigestions. It convinces me that Earth is still in her infancy, reaching out with tiny fingers all around. Fresh life springs from even the baldest surfaces. There’s nothing inorganic. These leafy mounds lie along the bank like furnace slag, showing that Nature is “in full swing” inside. The earth isn’t just a fragment of dead history, layer upon layer like the pages of a book, meant mostly for geologists and historians to study, but is living poetry like the leaves of a tree, which come before flowers and fruit—not a fossilized earth, but a vibrant one; compared to its great central life, all animal and plant life is merely parasitic. Its movements will stir our remains from their graves. You can melt your metals and shape them into the most beautiful forms possible; they will never amaze me like the shapes that this molten earth takes. And not just the earth, but the institutions on it are as moldable as clay in a potter's hands.

Ere long, not only on these banks, but on every hill and plain and in every hollow, the frost comes out of the ground like a dormant quadruped from its burrow, and seeks the sea with music, or migrates to other climes in clouds. Thaw with his gentle persuasion is more powerful than Thor with his hammer. The one melts, the other but breaks in pieces.

Soon, not just on these banks, but on every hill and flat area and in every hollow, the frost emerges from the ground like a sleepy animal coming out of its den, making its way to the sea with music, or moving to warmer places in clouds. The thaw, with its gentle touch, is more powerful than Thor with his hammer. One melts away, while the other just shatters into pieces.

When the ground was partially bare of snow, and a few warm days had dried its surface somewhat, it was pleasant to compare the first tender signs of the infant year just peeping forth with the stately beauty of the withered vegetation which had withstood the winter,—life-everlasting, golden-rods, pinweeds, and graceful wild grasses, more obvious and interesting frequently than in summer even, as if their beauty was not ripe till then; even cotton-grass, cat-tails, mulleins, johnswort, hard-hack, meadow-sweet, and other strong stemmed plants, those unexhausted granaries which entertain the earliest birds,—decent weeds, at least, which widowed Nature wears. I am particularly attracted by the arching and sheaf-like top of the wool-grass; it brings back the summer to our winter memories, and is among the forms which art loves to copy, and which, in the vegetable kingdom, have the same relation to types already in the mind of man that astronomy has. It is an antique style older than Greek or Egyptian. Many of the phenomena of Winter are suggestive of an inexpressible tenderness and fragile delicacy. We are accustomed to hear this king described as a rude and boisterous tyrant; but with the gentleness of a lover he adorns the tresses of Summer.

When the ground was partly clear of snow, and a few warm days had dried its surface a bit, it was nice to compare the first gentle signs of the new year just starting to emerge with the impressive beauty of the dry plants that had survived the winter—everlasting life, goldenrods, pinweeds, and graceful wild grasses, often more noticeable and interesting than in summer, as if their beauty wasn't fully developed until then; even cotton grass, cattails, mulleins, St. John's wort, hardhack, meadowsweet, and other sturdy plants, those endless stores that welcome the first birds—decent weeds that nature, in her solitude, displays. I’m especially drawn to the arching and sheaf-like top of the wool grass; it brings back summer memories in winter and is one of those forms that art loves to imitate, which in the plant world relate to concepts already in the human mind, similar to how astronomy functions. It has an ancient style, older than Greek or Egyptian art. Many of winter's features evoke an indescribable tenderness and fragile delicacy. We usually hear this season described as rough and loud; but with the gentleness of a lover, it decorates the tresses of summer.

At the approach of spring the red-squirrels got under my house, two at a time, directly under my feet as I sat reading or writing, and kept up the queerest chuckling and chirruping and vocal pirouetting and gurgling sounds that ever were heard; and when I stamped they only chirruped the louder, as if past all fear and respect in their mad pranks, defying humanity to stop them. No you don’t—chickaree—chickaree. They were wholly deaf to my arguments, or failed to perceive their force, and fell into a strain of invective that was irresistible.

As spring approached, the red squirrels got underneath my house, two at a time, right under my feet while I sat reading or writing. They made the most bizarre chuckling, chirping, vocal acrobatics, and gurgling sounds ever heard. When I stomped my feet, they only chirped louder, as if completely fearless and disrespectful in their wild antics, challenging me to stop them. No, you don't—chickaree—chickaree. They were completely oblivious to my arguments or just didn’t get them, and started a stream of insults that was impossible to resist.

The first sparrow of spring! The year beginning with younger hope than ever! The faint silvery warblings heard over the partially bare and moist fields from the blue-bird, the song-sparrow, and the red-wing, as if the last flakes of winter tinkled as they fell! What at such a time are histories, chronologies, traditions, and all written revelations? The brooks sing carols and glees to the spring. The marsh-hawk sailing low over the meadow is already seeking the first slimy life that awakes. The sinking sound of melting snow is heard in all dells, and the ice dissolves apace in the ponds. The grass flames up on the hillsides like a spring fire,—“et primitus oritur herba imbribus primoribus evocata,”—as if the earth sent forth an inward heat to greet the returning sun; not yellow but green is the color of its flame;—the symbol of perpetual youth, the grass-blade, like a long green ribbon, streams from the sod into the summer, checked indeed by the frost, but anon pushing on again, lifting its spear of last year’s hay with the fresh life below. It grows as steadily as the rill oozes out of the ground. It is almost identical with that, for in the growing days of June, when the rills are dry, the grass blades are their channels, and from year to year the herds drink at this perennial green stream, and the mower draws from it betimes their winter supply. So our human life but dies down to its root, and still puts forth its green blade to eternity.

The first sparrow of spring! The year starting with more hope than ever! You can hear the soft, silvery notes from the bluebird, song sparrow, and red-wing over the partially bare and damp fields, like the last flakes of winter tinkling as they fall! What do histories, timelines, traditions, and all written revelations mean at such a moment? The brooks sing joyful songs to spring. The marsh hawk gliding low over the meadow is already looking for the first slimy life that’s waking up. The sound of melting snow echoes in the valleys, and the ice is quickly melting in the ponds. The grass bursts into flame on the hillsides like a spring fire—“et primitus oritur herba imbribus primoribus evocata”—as if the earth is sending forth a warmth to welcome the returning sun; not yellow, but green is its flame;—the symbol of eternal youth, the grass blade, like a long green ribbon, stretches from the soil into summer, held back by frost, but soon pushing forward again, lifting last year’s hay with the new life beneath. It grows as steadily as the stream seeps out of the ground. It's almost identical to that, for in the growing days of June, when the streams are dry, the grass blades become their channels, and year after year the herds drink from this ever-flowing green stream, while the mower collects their winter supply. So our human life may fade down to its roots, but it still sends out its green blade towards eternity.

Walden is melting apace. There is a canal two rods wide along the northerly and westerly sides, and wider still at the east end. A great field of ice has cracked off from the main body. I hear a song-sparrow singing from the bushes on the shore,—olit, olit, olit,chip, chip, chip, che char,—che wiss, wiss, wiss. He too is helping to crack it. How handsome the great sweeping curves in the edge of the ice, answering somewhat to those of the shore, but more regular! It is unusually hard, owing to the recent severe but transient cold, and all watered or waved like a palace floor. But the wind slides eastward over its opaque surface in vain, till it reaches the living surface beyond. It is glorious to behold this ribbon of water sparkling in the sun, the bare face of the pond full of glee and youth, as if it spoke the joy of the fishes within it, and of the sands on its shore,—a silvery sheen as from the scales of a leuciscus, as it were all one active fish. Such is the contrast between winter and spring. Walden was dead and is alive again. But this spring it broke up more steadily, as I have said.

Walden is melting quickly. There’s a canal about two rods wide along the north and west sides, and even wider at the east end. A large sheet of ice has cracked away from the main mass. I can hear a song sparrow singing from the bushes on the shore,—olit, olit, olit,chip, chip, chip, che char,—che wiss, wiss, wiss. He’s adding to the cracking. The sweeping curves along the edge of the ice are beautiful, resembling those of the shore, but even more orderly! It’s unusually solid, thanks to the recent harsh but short cold spell, and it sparkles like a polished palace floor. But the wind slides eastward over its opaque surface in vain until it reaches the living surface beyond. It’s breathtaking to see this ribbon of water sparkling in the sun, the bare pond full of joy and youth, as if it reflects the happiness of the fish within it and the sands on its shore—a silvery shine like the scales of a leuciscus, as if it were all one lively fish. This is the contrast between winter and spring. Walden was dead and is alive again. But this spring, it broke up more steadily, as I’ve mentioned.

The change from storm and winter to serene and mild weather, from dark and sluggish hours to bright and elastic ones, is a memorable crisis which all things proclaim. It is seemingly instantaneous at last. Suddenly an influx of light filled my house, though the evening was at hand, and the clouds of winter still overhung it, and the eaves were dripping with sleety rain. I looked out the window, and lo! where yesterday was cold gray ice there lay the transparent pond already calm and full of hope as in a summer evening, reflecting a summer evening sky in its bosom, though none was visible overhead, as if it had intelligence with some remote horizon. I heard a robin in the distance, the first I had heard for many a thousand years, methought, whose note I shall not forget for many a thousand more,—the same sweet and powerful song as of yore. O the evening robin, at the end of a New England summer day! If I could ever find the twig he sits upon! I mean he; I mean the twig. This at least is not the Turdus migratorius. The pitch-pines and shrub-oaks about my house, which had so long drooped, suddenly resumed their several characters, looked brighter, greener, and more erect and alive, as if effectually cleansed and restored by the rain. I knew that it would not rain any more. You may tell by looking at any twig of the forest, ay, at your very wood-pile, whether its winter is past or not. As it grew darker, I was startled by the honking of geese flying low over the woods, like weary travellers getting in late from southern lakes, and indulging at last in unrestrained complaint and mutual consolation. Standing at my door, I could hear the rush of their wings; when, driving toward my house, they suddenly spied my light, and with hushed clamor wheeled and settled in the pond. So I came in, and shut the door, and passed my first spring night in the woods.

The shift from stormy winter to calm, mild weather, from gloomy, sluggish days to bright, lively ones, is a remarkable moment that everything seems to acknowledge. It feels almost instantaneous at last. Suddenly, a wave of light filled my house, even though it was evening, the winter clouds still looming overhead, and the eaves dripping with icy rain. I looked out the window, and behold! Where there was cold gray ice yesterday, now a clear pond lay calm and hopeful like a summer evening, reflecting a summer sky in its depths, even though none was visible above, as if it had a connection to some distant horizon. I heard a robin in the distance, the first I had heard in ages, whose song I won’t forget for many more years—the same sweet and strong tune as before. Oh, the evening robin at the end of a New England summer day! If I could only find the branch he’s perched on! I mean he; I mean the branch. This at least is not the Turdus migratorius. The pitch pines and scrub oaks around my house, which had drooped for so long, suddenly regained their form, appearing brighter, greener, and more upright and alive, as if they were thoroughly refreshed and restored by the rain. I knew it wouldn’t rain again. You can tell by looking at any twig in the forest, even at your own woodpile, whether winter is over or not. As it grew darker, I was startled by the honking of geese flying low over the woods, like tired travelers returning from southern lakes, finally indulging in unrestrained complaints and comforting each other. Standing at my door, I could hear the rush of their wings; then, as they approached my house, they suddenly noticed my light, and with quiet noise wheeled and landed in the pond. So I came inside, shut the door, and spent my first spring night in the woods.

In the morning I watched the geese from the door through the mist, sailing in the middle of the pond, fifty rods off, so large and tumultuous that Walden appeared like an artificial pond for their amusement. But when I stood on the shore they at once rose up with a great flapping of wings at the signal of their commander, and when they had got into rank circled about over my head, twenty-nine of them, and then steered straight to Canada, with a regular honk from the leader at intervals, trusting to break their fast in muddier pools. A “plump” of ducks rose at the same time and took the route to the north in the wake of their noisier cousins.

In the morning, I watched the geese from the doorway through the mist, gliding in the middle of the pond, fifty rods away. They were so large and chaotic that Walden looked like a man-made pond for their entertainment. But as soon as I stood on the shore, they quickly took flight with a loud flapping of wings at their leader's signal. Once they formed a line, they circled above me—twenty-nine of them—then headed straight to Canada, with the leader honking regularly, hoping to find some breakfast in muddier ponds. At the same time, a group of ducks took off and headed north, following their noisier cousins.

For a week I heard the circling, groping clangor of some solitary goose in the foggy mornings, seeking its companion, and still peopling the woods with the sound of a larger life than they could sustain. In April the pigeons were seen again flying express in small flocks, and in due time I heard the martins twittering over my clearing, though it had not seemed that the township contained so many that it could afford me any, and I fancied that they were peculiarly of the ancient race that dwelt in hollow trees ere white men came. In almost all climes the tortoise and the frog are among the precursors and heralds of this season, and birds fly with song and glancing plumage, and plants spring and bloom, and winds blow, to correct this slight oscillation of the poles and preserve the equilibrium of Nature.

For a week, I heard the repetitive, searching sound of a lone goose in the foggy mornings, looking for its mate, and it still filled the woods with the noise of a bigger life than they could support. In April, I saw pigeons again flying in small flocks, and eventually, I heard the martins chirping over my clearing, even though I didn’t think the area had enough to give me any, and I imagined they were part of the ancient breed that lived in hollow trees before white settlers arrived. In almost all regions, the tortoise and the frog are among the early signs and heralds of this season, while birds fly with song and shiny feathers, plants grow and bloom, and winds blow, to correct this small shift in the poles and maintain the balance of Nature.

As every season seems best to us in its turn, so the coming in of spring is like the creation of Cosmos out of Chaos and the realization of the Golden Age.—

As every season feels like the best one in its own time, the arrival of spring is like the emergence of the universe from chaos and the achievement of a golden age.—

“Eurus ad Auroram Nabathæaque regna recessit,
Persidaque, et radiis juga subdita matutinis.”

“The East-Wind withdrew to Aurora and the Nabathæan kingdom,
And the Persian, and the ridges placed under the morning rays

            *    *    *    *

Man was born. Whether that Artificer of things,
The origin of a better world, made him from the divine seed;
Or the earth, being recent and lately sundered from the high
Ether, retained some seeds of cognate heaven.”

“Eurus withdrew to the Dawn and the Nabataean kingdom,
And the Persian, with the hills basking in the morning light.

            *    *    *    *

Man was created. Whether that Creator of all things,
The source of a better world, made him from divine essence;
Or the earth, still new and recently separated from the high
Heavens, retained some seeds of a connected divine.”

A single gentle rain makes the grass many shades greener. So our prospects brighten on the influx of better thoughts. We should be blessed if we lived in the present always, and took advantage of every accident that befell us, like the grass which confesses the influence of the slightest dew that falls on it; and did not spend our time in atoning for the neglect of past opportunities, which we call doing our duty. We loiter in winter while it is already spring. In a pleasant spring morning all men’s sins are forgiven. Such a day is a truce to vice. While such a sun holds out to burn, the vilest sinner may return. Through our own recovered innocence we discern the innocence of our neighbors. You may have known your neighbor yesterday for a thief, a drunkard, or a sensualist, and merely pitied or despised him, and despaired of the world; but the sun shines bright and warm this first spring morning, re-creating the world, and you meet him at some serene work, and see how his exhausted and debauched veins expand with still joy and bless the new day, feel the spring influence with the innocence of infancy, and all his faults are forgotten. There is not only an atmosphere of good will about him, but even a savor of holiness groping for expression, blindly and ineffectually perhaps, like a new-born instinct, and for a short hour the south hill-side echoes to no vulgar jest. You see some innocent fair shoots preparing to burst from his gnarled rind and try another year’s life, tender and fresh as the youngest plant. Even he has entered into the joy of his Lord. Why the jailer does not leave open his prison doors,—why the judge does not dismis his case,—why the preacher does not dismiss his congregation! It is because they do not obey the hint which God gives them, nor accept the pardon which he freely offers to all.

A single gentle rain makes the grass many shades greener. Our outlook improves with better thoughts. We would be fortunate if we could always live in the moment and seize every opportunity that comes our way, just like the grass that shows the impact of even the slightest dew; and if we didn’t spend our time regretting missed opportunities, which we call doing our duty. We linger in winter while spring is already here. On a beautiful spring morning, all sins seem to be forgiven. Such a day feels like a break from wrongdoing. While the sun shines brightly, even the worst sinner can turn back. Through our own regained innocence, we notice the innocence in others. You might have seen your neighbor as a thief, a drunk, or a hedonist and simply felt pity or contempt, despairing about the world; but now the sun shines bright and warm on this first spring morning, reviving the world, and you see him engaged in some peaceful activity, noticing how his worn-out and troubled spirit rejuvenates with joy, celebrating the new day, feeling the spring's influence like the innocence of childhood, and all his faults are forgotten. There’s not just a feeling of goodwill around him but even a hint of holiness reaching for expression, even if it's awkward and clumsy, like a new instinct, and for a brief moment, the hillside is free from crude jokes. You spot some innocent new buds ready to emerge from his weathered exterior, eager to try again this year, tender and fresh like the youngest plant. Even he has joined in the joy of his Lord. Why doesn’t the jailer unlock his prison doors? Why doesn’t the judge dismiss his case? Why doesn’t the preacher end his sermon? It’s because they don’t take the hint that God offers them, nor accept the forgiveness He freely gives to everyone.

“A return to goodness produced each day in the tranquil and beneficent breath of the morning, causes that in respect to the love of virtue and the hatred of vice, one approaches a little the primitive nature of man, as the sprouts of the forest which has been felled. In like manner the evil which one does in the interval of a day prevents the germs of virtues which began to spring up again from developing themselves and destroys them.

“Returning to goodness each day in the calm and supportive breath of the morning brings us a bit closer to humanity's original nature, like the sprouts of a forest that has been cut down. Similarly, the wrongs we commit throughout the day hinder the growth of the virtues that have started to re-emerge and ultimately destroy them.”

“After the germs of virtue have thus been prevented many times from developing themselves, then the beneficent breath of evening does not suffice to preserve them. As soon as the breath of evening does not suffice longer to preserve them, then the nature of man does not differ much from that of the brute. Men seeing the nature of this man like that of the brute, think that he has never possessed the innate faculty of reason. Are those the true and natural sentiments of man?”

“After the seeds of virtue have been repeatedly stifled, the gentle evening breeze can no longer nurture them. Once the evening breeze fails to sustain them, human nature starts to resemble that of animals. When people see a man's nature resembling that of an animal, they assume he has never had the natural ability to reason. Are these the genuine and inherent feelings of humanity?”

“The Golden Age was first created, which without any avenger
Spontaneously without law cherished fidelity and rectitude.
Punishment and fear were not; nor were threatening words read
On suspended brass; nor did the suppliant crowd fear
The words of their judge; but were safe without an avenger.
Not yet the pine felled on its mountains had descended
To the liquid waves that it might see a foreign world,
And mortals knew no shores but their own.
            *    *    *    *
There was eternal spring, and placid zephyrs with warm
Blasts soothed the flowers born without seed.”

“The Golden Age was first created, where, without any avenger,
People naturally valued loyalty and righteousness without laws.
There was no punishment or fear; no ominous warnings were written
On metal plates; and the crowd didn’t fear
The judge’s words, feeling safe without an avenger.
The pine trees hadn’t yet been cut down from their mountains
To float on the waves to see a foreign land,
And people knew no shores but their own.
            *    *    *    *
It was eternal spring, and gentle breezes with warm
Winds comforted the flowers that grew without seeds.”

On the 29th of April, as I was fishing from the bank of the river near the Nine-Acre-Corner bridge, standing on the quaking grass and willow roots, where the muskrats lurk, I heard a singular rattling sound, somewhat like that of the sticks which boys play with their fingers, when, looking up, I observed a very slight and graceful hawk, like a night-hawk, alternately soaring like a ripple and tumbling a rod or two over and over, showing the underside of its wings, which gleamed like a satin ribbon in the sun, or like the pearly inside of a shell. This sight reminded me of falconry and what nobleness and poetry are associated with that sport. The Merlin it seemed to me it might be called: but I care not for its name. It was the most ethereal flight I had ever witnessed. It did not simply flutter like a butterfly, nor soar like the larger hawks, but it sported with proud reliance in the fields of air; mounting again and again with its strange chuckle, it repeated its free and beautiful fall, turning over and over like a kite, and then recovering from its lofty tumbling, as if it had never set its foot on terra firma. It appeared to have no companion in the universe,—sporting there alone,—and to need none but the morning and the ether with which it played. It was not lonely, but made all the earth lonely beneath it. Where was the parent which hatched it, its kindred, and its father in the heavens? The tenant of the air, it seemed related to the earth but by an egg hatched some time in the crevice of a crag;—or was its native nest made in the angle of a cloud, woven of the rainbow’s trimmings and the sunset sky, and lined with some soft midsummer haze caught up from earth? Its eyry now some cliffy cloud.

On April 29th, while fishing from the riverbank near the Nine-Acre-Corner bridge, standing on the shaky grass and willow roots where muskrats hide, I heard a strange rattling noise, somewhat like the sound of sticks that boys play with. Looking up, I spotted a very slender and graceful hawk, similar to a night hawk, soaring smoothly like a ripple and then tumbling over and over, showcasing the underside of its wings that shone like a satin ribbon in the sun or the pearly inside of a shell. This sight brought to mind falconry, evoking the nobility and poetry associated with that sport. I thought it could be called a Merlin, but I didn't care about its name. It was the most ethereal flight I had ever seen. It didn't just flutter like a butterfly or soar like larger hawks; it played confidently in the open sky, climbing higher and higher, letting out its strange chuckle as it repeated its beautiful free fall, turning over and over like a kite, and then recovering from its lofty tumble as if it had never touched the ground. It seemed to have no companion in the universe, enjoying itself alone, needing nothing but the morning and the air it danced with. It wasn't lonely; it made everything beneath it feel lonely. Where was the parent that hatched it, its relatives, and its father in the heavens? This tenant of the air seemed connected to the earth only by an egg laid sometime in the crevice of a cliff; or was its original nest made in the bend of a cloud, crafted from the rainbow’s decor and the sunset sky, and lined with soft midsummer mist caught from the earth? Its nest now appeared to be some cloudy precipice.

Beside this I got a rare mess of golden and silver and bright cupreous fishes, which looked like a string of jewels. Ah! I have penetrated to those meadows on the morning of many a first spring day, jumping from hummock to hummock, from willow root to willow root, when the wild river valley and the woods were bathed in so pure and bright a light as would have waked the dead, if they had been slumbering in their graves, as some suppose. There needs no stronger proof of immortality. All things must live in such a light. O Death, where was thy sting? O Grave, where was thy victory, then?

Beside this, I found a rare mix of golden, silver, and shiny coppery fish that looked like a string of jewels. Ah! I've wandered into those meadows on the mornings of many early spring days, jumping from hummock to hummock, from willow root to willow root, when the wild river valley and the woods were soaked in such pure and bright light that it could've awakened the dead if they had been resting in their graves, as some believe. There’s no stronger proof of immortality. Everything must thrive in such light. O Death, where was your sting? O Grave, where was your victory, then?

Our village life would stagnate if it were not for the unexplored forests and meadows which surround it. We need the tonic of wildness,—to wade sometimes in marshes where the bittern and the meadow-hen lurk, and hear the booming of the snipe; to smell the whispering sedge where only some wilder and more solitary fowl builds her nest, and the mink crawls with its belly close to the ground. At the same time that we are earnest to explore and learn all things, we require that all things be mysterious and unexplorable, that land and sea be infinitely wild, unsurveyed and unfathomed by us because unfathomable. We can never have enough of Nature. We must be refreshed by the sight of inexhaustible vigor, vast and Titanic features, the sea-coast with its wrecks, the wilderness with its living and its decaying trees, the thunder cloud, and the rain which lasts three weeks and produces freshets. We need to witness our own limits transgressed, and some life pasturing freely where we never wander. We are cheered when we observe the vulture feeding on the carrion which disgusts and disheartens us and deriving health and strength from the repast. There was a dead horse in the hollow by the path to my house, which compelled me sometimes to go out of my way, especially in the night when the air was heavy, but the assurance it gave me of the strong appetite and inviolable health of Nature was my compensation for this. I love to see that Nature is so rife with life that myriads can be afforded to be sacrificed and suffered to prey on one another; that tender organizations can be so serenely squashed out of existence like pulp,—tadpoles which herons gobble up, and tortoises and toads run over in the road; and that sometimes it has rained flesh and blood! With the liability to accident, we must see how little account is to be made of it. The impression made on a wise man is that of universal innocence. Poison is not poisonous after all, nor are any wounds fatal. Compassion is a very untenable ground. It must be expeditious. Its pleadings will not bear to be stereotyped.

Our village life would stagnate without the unexplored forests and meadows surrounding it. We need the refreshment of wildness—to wade into marshes where the bittern and the meadow-hen hide, and hear the snipe's booming; to enjoy the scent of the whispering sedge, where only the wildest and most solitary birds nest, and the mink crawls low to the ground. While we are eager to explore and learn everything, we also need things to remain mysterious and uncharted, with land and sea being infinitely wild, unmeasured, and unfathomable to us. We can never get enough of Nature. We must be revitalized by the sight of endless energy, vast and monumental landscapes, the coastline with its shipwrecks, the wilderness with its thriving and decaying trees, the thunderclouds, and the rain that lasts for three weeks and causes floods. We need to see our own boundaries broken, and life roaming freely where we never tread. We feel uplifted when we see the vulture feeding on carrion that disgusts and discourages us, drawing health and strength from the feast. There was a dead horse in the hollow by the path to my house, which sometimes forced me to take a detour, especially at night when the air was heavy. But the assurance it gave me of Nature's strong appetite and unbreakable health compensated for that. I love to see that Nature is so full of life that countless beings can be sacrificed, allowing them to prey on one another; that delicate organisms can be calmly crushed out of existence like pulp—tadpoles gobbled up by herons, and tortoises and toads run over in the road; and that sometimes it has rained flesh and blood! Despite the risk of accidents, we should see how little significance it truly holds. A wise person's impression is one of universal innocence. Poison isn’t really poisonous, nor are any wounds fatal. Compassion is a very shaky foundation. It must be swift. Its arguments cannot stand the test of time.

Early in May, the oaks, hickories, maples, and other trees, just putting out amidst the pine woods around the pond, imparted a brightness like sunshine to the landscape, especially in cloudy days, as if the sun were breaking through mists and shining faintly on the hill-sides here and there. On the third or fourth of May I saw a loon in the pond, and during the first week of the month I heard the whippoorwill, the brown-thrasher, the veery, the wood-pewee, the chewink, and other birds. I had heard the wood-thrush long before. The phœbe had already come once more and looked in at my door and window, to see if my house was cavern-like enough for her, sustaining herself on humming wings with clinched talons, as if she held by the air, while she surveyed the premises. The sulphur-like pollen of the pitch-pine soon covered the pond and the stones and rotten wood along the shore, so that you could have collected a barrel-ful. This is the “sulphur showers” we hear of. Even in Calidas’ drama of Sacontala, we read of “rills dyed yellow with the golden dust of the lotus.” And so the seasons went rolling on into summer, as one rambles into higher and higher grass.

Early in May, the oaks, hickories, maples, and other trees, just starting to sprout among the pine woods around the pond, brought a brightness like sunshine to the landscape, especially on cloudy days, as if the sun were breaking through mist and shining softly on the hills here and there. On the third or fourth of May, I spotted a loon in the pond, and during the first week of the month, I heard the whippoorwill, the brown-thrasher, the veery, the wood-pewee, the chewink, and other birds. I had heard the wood-thrush long before. The phoebe had already returned and looked in at my door and window to see if my house was cozy enough for her, hovering in place with her little claws gripping the air as she checked out the area. The sulfur-like pollen from the pitch pine soon coated the pond and the stones and decaying wood along the shore, making it easy to collect a barrel full. This is the “sulfur showers” we hear about. Even in Kalidasa’s drama of Shakuntala, we read of “rills dyed yellow with the golden dust of the lotus.” And so the seasons rolled on into summer, like walking into deeper and deeper grass.

Thus was my first year’s life in the woods completed; and the second year was similar to it. I finally left Walden September 6th, 1847.

Thus was my first year living in the woods finished; and the second year was similar. I finally left Walden on September 6th, 1847.

Conclusion

To the sick the doctors wisely recommend a change of air and scenery. Thank Heaven, here is not all the world. The buck-eye does not grow in New England, and the mocking-bird is rarely heard here. The wild-goose is more of a cosmopolite than we; he breaks his fast in Canada, takes a luncheon in the Ohio, and plumes himself for the night in a southern bayou. Even the bison, to some extent, keeps pace with the seasons, cropping the pastures of the Colorado only till a greener and sweeter grass awaits him by the Yellowstone. Yet we think that if rail-fences are pulled down, and stone-walls piled up on our farms, bounds are henceforth set to our lives and our fates decided. If you are chosen town-clerk, forsooth, you cannot go to Tierra del Fuego this summer: but you may go to the land of infernal fire nevertheless. The universe is wider than our views of it.

To the sick, doctors wisely suggest a change of air and scenery. Thank goodness, this isn’t the whole world. The buckeye tree doesn’t grow in New England, and you rarely hear the mockingbird here. The wild goose is more of a wanderer than we are; it has breakfast in Canada, has lunch in Ohio, and settles down for the night in a southern bayou. Even the bison, to some extent, follows the seasons, grazing in the Colorado pastures until greener and sweeter grass awaits it by the Yellowstone. Yet we believe that if rail fences are taken down and stone walls are built on our farms, there are limits placed on our lives and our fates are decided. If you're chosen as town clerk, you can’t go to Tierra del Fuego this summer: but you can still go to the land of eternal fire. The universe is bigger than our view of it.

Yet we should oftener look over the tafferel of our craft, like curious passengers, and not make the voyage like stupid sailors picking oakum. The other side of the globe is but the home of our correspondent. Our voyaging is only great-circle sailing, and the doctors prescribe for diseases of the skin merely. One hastens to Southern Africa to chase the giraffe; but surely that is not the game he would be after. How long, pray, would a man hunt giraffes if he could? Snipes and woodcocks also may afford rare sport; but I trust it would be nobler game to shoot one’s self.—

Yet we should often take a look over the side of our ship, like curious passengers, instead of going through the journey like clueless sailors picking apart rope. The other side of the world is just the home of our friend. Our journeying is only a straight path sailing, and the doctors only treat surface-level issues. One rushes to Southern Africa to chase after giraffes; but surely that's not the real prize he seeks. How long, honestly, would someone hunt giraffes if they could? Snipes and woodcocks might also provide some fun; but I believe it would be a loftier pursuit to focus on one’s own self.

“Direct your eye right inward, and you’ll find
A thousand regions in your mind
Yet undiscovered. Travel them, and be
Expert in home-cosmography.”

“Look deep within yourself, and you’ll find
A thousand areas in your mind
Still unexplored. Explore them, and become
Skilled in your personal map of the universe.”

What does Africa,—what does the West stand for? Is not our own interior white on the chart? black though it may prove, like the coast, when discovered. Is it the source of the Nile, or the Niger, or the Mississippi, or a North-West Passage around this continent, that we would find? Are these the problems which most concern mankind? Is Franklin the only man who is lost, that his wife should be so earnest to find him? Does Mr. Grinnell know where he himself is? Be rather the Mungo Park, the Lewis and Clarke and Frobisher, of your own streams and oceans; explore your own higher latitudes,—with shiploads of preserved meats to support you, if they be necessary; and pile the empty cans sky-high for a sign. Were preserved meats invented to preserve meat merely? Nay, be a Columbus to whole new continents and worlds within you, opening new channels, not of trade, but of thought. Every man is the lord of a realm beside which the earthly empire of the Czar is but a petty state, a hummock left by the ice. Yet some can be patriotic who have no self-respect, and sacrifice the greater to the less. They love the soil which makes their graves, but have no sympathy with the spirit which may still animate their clay. Patriotism is a maggot in their heads. What was the meaning of that South-Sea Exploring Expedition, with all its parade and expense, but an indirect recognition of the fact, that there are continents and seas in the moral world to which every man is an isthmus or an inlet, yet unexplored by him, but that it is easier to sail many thousand miles through cold and storm and cannibals, in a government ship, with five hundred men and boys to assist one, than it is to explore the private sea, the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean of one’s being alone.—

What does Africa mean to us, and what does the West represent? Isn’t our own inner landscape blank on the map? It may turn out to be just as complex as the coast once we delve deeper. Are we searching for the sources of the Nile, the Niger, the Mississippi, or a Northwest Passage around this continent? Are these the issues that truly matter to humanity? Is Franklin the only person who's missing that his wife should be so eager to find him? Does Mr. Grinnell even know where he is himself? Instead, be like Mungo Park, Lewis and Clark, and Frobisher as you navigate your own rivers and seas; explore your own higher realms—with supplies of preserved food, if necessary; and stack the empty cans high as a marker. Were preserved foods created just to keep meat fresh? No, be a Columbus to entirely new continents and worlds within yourself, opening new pathways not of trade, but of ideas. Each individual is the ruler of a realm that makes the earthly empire of the Czar seem like a small state, just a bump left by ice. Yet, some can be patriotic without any self-respect, sacrificing the greater for the smaller. They cherish the land that holds their graves but lack any connection to the spirit that may still inhabit their remains. For them, patriotism is a mere obsession. What was the purpose of that South Sea Exploring Expedition, with all its fanfare and expense, but an indirect acknowledgment that there are continents and oceans in the moral realm that everyone is an isthmus or inlet to, yet unexplored by themselves? It’s easier to travel thousands of miles through cold, storms, and dangers on a government ship, backed by five hundred men and boys, than it is to explore the inner ocean—the Atlantic and Pacific of one’s own spirit—alone.

“Erret, et extremos alter scrutetur Iberos.
Plus habet hic vitæ, plus habet ille viæ.”

Let them wander and scrutinize the outlandish Australians.
I have more of God, they more of the road.

“Erret, et extremos alter scrutetur Iberos.
Plus habet hic vitæ, plus habet ille viæ.”

Let them roam and explore the distant Australians.
I have more of the divine, they have more of the journey.

It is not worth the while to go round the world to count the cats in Zanzibar. Yet do this even till you can do better, and you may perhaps find some “Symmes’ Hole” by which to get at the inside at last. England and France, Spain and Portugal, Gold Coast and Slave Coast, all front on this private sea; but no bark from them has ventured out of sight of land, though it is without doubt the direct way to India. If you would learn to speak all tongues and conform to the customs of all nations, if you would travel farther than all travellers, be naturalized in all climes, and cause the Sphinx to dash her head against a stone, even obey the precept of the old philosopher, and Explore thyself. Herein are demanded the eye and the nerve. Only the defeated and deserters go to the wars, cowards that run away and enlist. Start now on that farthest western way, which does not pause at the Mississippi or the Pacific, nor conduct toward a worn-out China or Japan, but leads on direct a tangent to this sphere, summer and winter, day and night, sun down, moon down, and at last earth down too.

It's not worth your time to travel the world just to count the cats in Zanzibar. However, keep at it until you can do better, and you might discover some "Symmes’ Hole" that allows you to reach the core in the end. England and France, Spain and Portugal, the Gold Coast and the Slave Coast, all border this private sea; yet no ship from them has dared to go out of sight of land, even though it undeniably leads straight to India. If you want to learn every language and follow the customs of every country, if you wish to travel further than any other traveler, become a citizen of all climates, and make the Sphinx bang her head against a rock, then heed the advice of the old philosopher: Explore yourself. It requires perception and courage. Only the defeated and the deserters go to war—cowards who flee and enlist. Begin on that farthest western route, which doesn’t stop at the Mississippi or the Pacific, nor head towards a tired China or Japan; instead, it leads directly on a tangent to this world, summer and winter, day and night, sun down, moon down, and eventually earth down too.

It is said that Mirabeau took to highway robbery “to ascertain what degree of resolution was necessary in order to place one’s self in formal opposition to the most sacred laws of society.” He declared that “a soldier who fights in the ranks does not require half so much courage as a foot-pad,”—“that honor and religion have never stood in the way of a well-considered and a firm resolve.” This was manly, as the world goes; and yet it was idle, if not desperate. A saner man would have found himself often enough “in formal opposition” to what are deemed “the most sacred laws of society,” through obedience to yet more sacred laws, and so have tested his resolution without going out of his way. It is not for a man to put himself in such an attitude to society, but to maintain himself in whatever attitude he find himself through obedience to the laws of his being, which will never be one of opposition to a just government, if he should chance to meet with such.

It’s said that Mirabeau turned to highway robbery “to see how much determination it takes to formally oppose the most sacred laws of society.” He stated that “a soldier fighting alongside others doesn’t need nearly as much courage as a robber,”—“that honor and religion have never interfered with a well-thought-out and firm decision.” This was manly, in a way; yet it was also pointless, if not silly. A more sensible person would have found themselves often enough “in formal opposition” to what are considered “the most sacred laws of society,” by adhering to even more sacred laws, and would have tested their resolve without going out of their way. It’s not for a man to position himself against society, but to sustain himself in whatever position he finds himself through following the laws of his being, which will never lead to opposition to a just government, should he encounter one.

I left the woods for as good a reason as I went there. Perhaps it seemed to me that I had several more lives to live, and could not spare any more time for that one. It is remarkable how easily and insensibly we fall into a particular route, and make a beaten track for ourselves. I had not lived there a week before my feet wore a path from my door to the pond-side; and though it is five or six years since I trod it, it is still quite distinct. It is true, I fear that others may have fallen into it, and so helped to keep it open. The surface of the earth is soft and impressible by the feet of men; and so with the paths which the mind travels. How worn and dusty, then, must be the highways of the world, how deep the ruts of tradition and conformity! I did not wish to take a cabin passage, but rather to go before the mast and on the deck of the world, for there I could best see the moonlight amid the mountains. I do not wish to go below now.

I left the woods for the same reason I went there. Maybe it felt like I had many more lives to live and couldn’t waste any more time on that one. It’s amazing how easily and unknowingly we fall into a specific routine and create a well-trodden path for ourselves. I hadn’t lived there a week before I had worn a path from my door to the pond; and even though it's been five or six years since I walked it, it’s still quite clear. I fear that others may have used it too, helping to keep it open. The ground is soft and easily marked by people’s feet; the same goes for the paths our minds travel. How worn and dusty must be the highways of the world, and how deep the ruts of tradition and conformity! I didn’t want to take a cabin passage; I wanted to go upfront and on deck, where I could better see the moonlight among the mountains. I don’t want to go below now.

I learned this, at least, by my experiment; that if one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common hours. He will put some things behind, will pass an invisible boundary; new, universal, and more liberal laws will begin to establish themselves around and within him; or the old laws be expanded, and interpreted in his favor in a more liberal sense, and he will live with the license of a higher order of beings. In proportion as he simplifies his life, the laws of the universe will appear less complex, and solitude will not be solitude, nor poverty poverty, nor weakness weakness. If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them.

I learned this from my own experience: if you move confidently toward your dreams and try to live the life you’ve imagined, you’ll find success that’s unexpected during regular times. You’ll let go of some things and cross an invisible boundary; new, universal, and more open laws will start to take shape around you and within you. The old laws will be broadened and interpreted in your favor, allowing you to live with the freedom of a higher level of existence. As you simplify your life, the laws of the universe will seem less complicated, and solitude won’t feel like solitude, poverty won’t feel like poverty, and weakness won’t feel like weakness. If you’ve built castles in the air, your efforts aren’t wasted; that’s exactly where they belong. Now, lay the foundations beneath them.

It is a ridiculous demand which England and America make, that you shall speak so that they can understand you. Neither men nor toad-stools grow so. As if that were important, and there were not enough to understand you without them. As if Nature could support but one order of understandings, could not sustain birds as well as quadrupeds, flying as well as creeping things, and hush and who, which Bright can understand, were the best English. As if there were safety in stupidity alone. I fear chiefly lest my expression may not be extra-vagant enough, may not wander far enough beyond the narrow limits of my daily experience, so as to be adequate to the truth of which I have been convinced. Extra vagance! it depends on how you are yarded. The migrating buffalo, which seeks new pastures in another latitude, is not extravagant like the cow which kicks over the pail, leaps the cow-yard fence, and runs after her calf, in milking time. I desire to speak somewhere without bounds; like a man in a waking moment, to men in their waking moments; for I am convinced that I cannot exaggerate enough even to lay the foundation of a true expression. Who that has heard a strain of music feared then lest he should speak extravagantly any more forever? In view of the future or possible, we should live quite laxly and undefined in front, our outlines dim and misty on that side; as our shadows reveal an insensible perspiration toward the sun. The volatile truth of our words should continually betray the inadequacy of the residual statement. Their truth is instantly translated; its literal monument alone remains. The words which express our faith and piety are not definite; yet they are significant and fragrant like frankincense to superior natures.

It's a ridiculous expectation that England and America have, demanding that you speak in a way they can understand. Neither people nor mushrooms grow that way. As if that's the important part, when there's already enough to get what you mean without them. As if Nature could only support one kind of understanding, as if it couldn't accommodate birds as well as four-legged animals, those that fly as well as those that crawl, and hush and who, which Bright can understand, were the ultimate English. As if there was safety in just being stupid. What I really worry about is that my expression might not be extra-vagant enough, might not stray far enough from the narrow limits of my everyday experiences to truly convey the truth I'm convinced of. Extra vagance! It depends on how you measure it. The migrating buffalo, which seeks new pastures in another region, isn't extravagant like the cow that knocks over the bucket, jumps the fence, and runs after her calf at milking time. I want to speak without limitations; like a man alert and aware, to people who are also attentive; because I believe I can't exaggerate too much even to lay the groundwork for a genuine expression. Who, after hearing a piece of music, ever worried that they would speak too extravagantly again? In considering the future or the possibilities, we should live rather loosely and undefined in that direction, our outlines faint and blurry on that side, just as our shadows hint at an imperceptible sweat toward the sun. The volatile truth of our words should continuously reveal the inadequacy of what remains unsaid. Their truth is immediately translated; only its literal representation stays. The words that express our beliefs and devotion aren't fixed; yet they carry significance and have a sweet aroma like frankincense to those of a higher nature.

Why level downward to our dullest perception always, and praise that as common sense? The commonest sense is the sense of men asleep, which they express by snoring. Sometimes we are inclined to class those who are once-and-a-half-witted with the half-witted, because we appreciate only a third part of their wit. Some would find fault with the morning-red, if they ever got up early enough. “They pretend,” as I hear, “that the verses of Kabir have four different senses; illusion, spirit, intellect, and the exoteric doctrine of the Vedas;” but in this part of the world it is considered a ground for complaint if a man’s writings admit of more than one interpretation. While England endeavors to cure the potato-rot, will not any endeavor to cure the brain-rot, which prevails so much more widely and fatally?

Why do we always settle for our dullest perceptions and call that common sense? The most common sense is that of people who are asleep, which they show by snoring. Sometimes we tend to group those who are one-and-a-half-witted with the half-witted because we only understand a fraction of their cleverness. Some would criticize the sunrise if they ever woke up early enough. “They claim,” as I've heard, “that the verses of Kabir have four different meanings: illusion, spirit, intellect, and the surface-level teachings of the Vedas;” but here, it’s seen as a problem if a person’s writings can be interpreted in more than one way. While England works on fixing the potato blight, isn't there an effort that should be made to address the much more widespread and harmful brain rot?

I do not suppose that I have attained to obscurity, but I should be proud if no more fatal fault were found with my pages on this score than was found with the Walden ice. Southern customers objected to its blue color, which is the evidence of its purity, as if it were muddy, and preferred the Cambridge ice, which is white, but tastes of weeds. The purity men love is like the mists which envelop the earth, and not like the azure ether beyond.

I don't think I've become obscure, but I'd be proud if the only serious criticism of my work was similar to what people said about the Walden ice. Customers from the South complained about its blue color, which actually showed its purity, as if it were dirty, and they preferred the Cambridge ice, which is white but has a taste of weeds. The kind of purity people crave is like the fog that covers the earth, not like the clear blue sky above.

Some are dinning in our ears that we Americans, and moderns generally, are intellectual dwarfs compared with the ancients, or even the Elizabethan men. But what is that to the purpose? A living dog is better than a dead lion. Shall a man go and hang himself because he belongs to the race of pygmies, and not be the biggest pygmy that he can? Let every one mind his own business, and endeavor to be what he was made.

Some people are constantly reminding us that we Americans, and modern people in general, are intellectual dwarfs compared to the ancients or even the Elizabethans. But what does that really matter? A living dog is better than a dead lion. Should someone go and hang themselves just because they belong to the race of pygmies, instead of trying to be the biggest pygmy they can be? Let everyone focus on their own lives and strive to be who they were meant to be.

Why should we be in such desperate haste to succeed, and in such desperate enterprises? If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away. It is not important that he should mature as soon as an apple-tree or an oak. Shall he turn his spring into summer? If the condition of things which we were made for is not yet, what were any reality which we can substitute? We will not be shipwrecked on a vain reality. Shall we with pains erect a heaven of blue glass over ourselves, though when it is done we shall be sure to gaze still at the true ethereal heaven far above, as if the former were not?

Why are we in such a rush to succeed and take on overwhelming challenges? If someone isn't keeping up with their peers, maybe it's because they hear a different rhythm. They should follow the beat that resonates with them, no matter how distant it may seem. It's not crucial for them to mature as quickly as an apple tree or an oak. Should they force their springtime into summer? If the conditions we were meant for aren't here yet, what good is any substitute reality? We won't get lost in a meaningless existence. Should we work hard to create a fake blue sky above us, knowing that once it's done, we'll still look up at the real, endless sky above, as if the illusion isn't there?

There was an artist in the city of Kouroo who was disposed to strive after perfection. One day it came into his mind to make a staff. Having considered that in an imperfect work time is an ingredient, but into a perfect work time does not enter, he said to himself, It shall be perfect in all respects, though I should do nothing else in my life. He proceeded instantly to the forest for wood, being resolved that it should not be made of unsuitable material; and as he searched for and rejected stick after stick, his friends gradually deserted him, for they grew old in their works and died, but he grew not older by a moment. His singleness of purpose and resolution, and his elevated piety, endowed him, without his knowledge, with perennial youth. As he made no compromise with Time, Time kept out of his way, and only sighed at a distance because he could not overcome him. Before he had found a stock in all respects suitable the city of Kouroo was a hoary ruin, and he sat on one of its mounds to peel the stick. Before he had given it the proper shape the dynasty of the Candahars was at an end, and with the point of the stick he wrote the name of the last of that race in the sand, and then resumed his work. By the time he had smoothed and polished the staff Kalpa was no longer the pole-star; and ere he had put on the ferrule and the head adorned with precious stones, Brahma had awoke and slumbered many times. But why do I stay to mention these things? When the finishing stroke was put to his work, it suddenly expanded before the eyes of the astonished artist into the fairest of all the creations of Brahma. He had made a new system in making a staff, a world with full and fair proportions; in which, though the old cities and dynasties had passed away, fairer and more glorious ones had taken their places. And now he saw by the heap of shavings still fresh at his feet, that, for him and his work, the former lapse of time had been an illusion, and that no more time had elapsed than is required for a single scintillation from the brain of Brahma to fall on and inflame the tinder of a mortal brain. The material was pure, and his art was pure; how could the result be other than wonderful?

There was an artist in the city of Kouroo who was determined to achieve perfection. One day, he decided to make a staff. He thought about how in an imperfect work, time is a factor, but in a perfect work, time doesn’t play a role. He told himself, "It will be perfect in every way, even if it takes my whole life." He immediately went to the forest for wood, intent on using only suitable material; as he searched through and rejected stick after stick, his friends slowly abandoned him because they aged and died, while he didn't seem to age at all. His single-minded focus, determination, and deep devotion gave him, without him realizing it, everlasting youth. Since he made no compromises with Time, Time stayed away from him, only sighing from a distance because it couldn't defeat him. By the time he found a piece of wood that was completely suitable, the city of Kouroo had become a gray ruin, and he sat on one of its mounds to peel the stick. Before he shaped it properly, the dynasty of the Candahars had ended, and he used the tip of the stick to write the name of the last of that lineage in the sand, then continued with his work. By the time he had smoothed and polished the staff, Kalpa was no longer the pole star; and before he had added the ferrule and the head adorned with precious stones, Brahma had awakened and slept many times. But why do I even mention these details? When the final touch was added to his work, it miraculously transformed before the eyes of the amazed artist into the most beautiful of all creations of Brahma. He had created a new system in making a staff, a world with complete and fair proportions; in which, although the old cities and dynasties had faded away, more beautiful and glorious ones had taken their place. Now he realized, looking at the pile of shavings fresh at his feet, that for him and his work, the passage of time had been an illusion, and that no more time had passed than what it takes for a single spark from the mind of Brahma to ignite the tinder of a human brain. The material was pure, and his art was pure; how could the outcome be anything less than extraordinary?

No face which we can give to a matter will stead us so well at last as the truth. This alone wears well. For the most part, we are not where we are, but in a false position. Through an infirmity of our natures, we suppose a case, and put ourselves into it, and hence are in two cases at the same time, and it is doubly difficult to get out. In sane moments we regard only the facts, the case that is. Say what you have to say, not what you ought. Any truth is better than make-believe. Tom Hyde, the tinker, standing on the gallows, was asked if he had anything to say. “Tell the tailors,” said he, “to remember to make a knot in their thread before they take the first stitch.” His companion’s prayer is forgotten.

No perspective we choose to take on a situation will serve us as well in the end as the truth. This alone lasts. Most of the time, we find ourselves not in reality but in a false position. Because of a weakness in our nature, we imagine a scenario and put ourselves in it, leading us to be in two situations at once, making it doubly hard to get out. In clear moments, we focus only on the facts, the actual situation. Speak your truth, not what you think you should say. Any truth is better than pretending. Tom Hyde, the tinker, standing on the gallows, was asked if he had any last words. “Tell the tailors,” he said, “to remember to make a knot in their thread before they take the first stitch.” His companion’s prayer is forgotten.

However mean your life is, meet it and live it; do not shun it and call it hard names. It is not so bad as you are. It looks poorest when you are richest. The fault-finder will find faults even in paradise. Love your life, poor as it is. You may perhaps have some pleasant, thrilling, glorious hours, even in a poor-house. The setting sun is reflected from the windows of the alms-house as brightly as from the rich man’s abode; the snow melts before its door as early in the spring. I do not see but a quiet mind may live as contentedly there, and have as cheering thoughts, as in a palace. The town’s poor seem to me often to live the most independent lives of any. May be they are simply great enough to receive without misgiving. Most think that they are above being supported by the town; but it oftener happens that they are not above supporting themselves by dishonest means, which should be more disreputable. Cultivate poverty like a garden herb, like sage. Do not trouble yourself much to get new things, whether clothes or friends. Turn the old; return to them. Things do not change; we change. Sell your clothes and keep your thoughts. God will see that you do not want society. If I were confined to a corner of a garret all my days, like a spider, the world would be just as large to me while I had my thoughts about me. The philosopher said: “From an army of three divisions one can take away its general, and put it in disorder; from the man the most abject and vulgar one cannot take away his thought.” Do not seek so anxiously to be developed, to subject yourself to many influences to be played on; it is all dissipation. Humility like darkness reveals the heavenly lights. The shadows of poverty and meanness gather around us, “and lo! creation widens to our view.” We are often reminded that if there were bestowed on us the wealth of Crœsus, our aims must still be the same, and our means essentially the same. Moreover, if you are restricted in your range by poverty, if you cannot buy books and newspapers, for instance, you are but confined to the most significant and vital experiences; you are compelled to deal with the material which yields the most sugar and the most starch. It is life near the bone where it is sweetest. You are defended from being a trifler. No man loses ever on a lower level by magnanimity on a higher. Superfluous wealth can buy superfluities only. Money is not required to buy one necessary of the soul.

No matter how tough your life is, face it and live it; don’t avoid it and call it names. It’s not as bad as you are. Life appears worst when you’re at your wealthiest. A critic will always find faults, even in paradise. Appreciate your life, no matter how poor it may seem. You might still have some enjoyable, exciting, wonderful moments, even in a poorhouse. The setting sun shines in the windows of the charity house just as brightly as it does in a rich man’s home; the snow melts in front of its door just as early in the spring. I believe a calm mind can be just as content there and have just as uplifting thoughts as in a palace. The town’s poor often seem to lead the most independent lives. Maybe they’re simply confident enough to accept help without doubt. Most people think they’re above being supported by the town, but more often than not, they’re not above relying on dishonest means to support themselves, which is far more shameful. Embrace poverty like a garden herb, like sage. Don't stress too much about getting new things, whether clothes or friends. Revisit the old ones. Things don’t really change; we do. Sell your clothes and keep your thoughts. God will ensure you don’t lack company. If I were stuck in a corner of an attic my whole life, like a spider, the world would still feel just as big as long as I had my thoughts with me. The philosopher said: “You can take away the general from an army of three divisions and throw it into chaos; but from the most abject and ordinary man, you cannot take away his thoughts.” Don’t be so anxious to develop, to put yourself under many influences; it’s all just a distraction. Humility, like darkness, reveals the heavenly lights. The shadows of poverty and hardship surround us, and “lo! creation widens to our view.” We often hear that if we were given the wealth of Crœsus, our goals would remain the same, and our means would essentially be unchanged. Furthermore, if poverty limits what you can access, like books and newspapers, you are confined to the most important and meaningful experiences; you have to focus on what provides the most substance. It’s life at its rawest that is most enjoyable. You’re protected from being a mere trifler. No one ever suffers on a lower level from being generous on a higher one. Excessive wealth can only buy excess. Money is not needed to purchase what is necessary for the soul.

I live in the angle of a leaden wall, into whose composition was poured a little alloy of bell metal. Often, in the repose of my mid-day, there reaches my ears a confused tintinnabulum from without. It is the noise of my contemporaries. My neighbors tell me of their adventures with famous gentlemen and ladies, what notabilities they met at the dinner-table; but I am no more interested in such things than in the contents of the Daily Times. The interest and the conversation are about costume and manners chiefly; but a goose is a goose still, dress it as you will. They tell me of California and Texas, of England and the Indies, of the Hon. Mr. —— of Georgia or of Massachusetts, all transient and fleeting phenomena, till I am ready to leap from their court-yard like the Mameluke bey. I delight to come to my bearings,—not walk in procession with pomp and parade, in a conspicuous place, but to walk even with the Builder of the universe, if I may,—not to live in this restless, nervous, bustling, trivial Nineteenth Century, but stand or sit thoughtfully while it goes by. What are men celebrating? They are all on a committee of arrangements, and hourly expect a speech from somebody. God is only the president of the day, and Webster is his orator. I love to weigh, to settle, to gravitate toward that which most strongly and rightfully attracts me;—not hang by the beam of the scale and try to weigh less,—not suppose a case, but take the case that is; to travel the only path I can, and that on which no power can resist me. It affords me no satisfaction to commence to spring an arch before I have got a solid foundation. Let us not play at kittly-benders. There is a solid bottom every where. We read that the traveller asked the boy if the swamp before him had a hard bottom. The boy replied that it had. But presently the traveller’s horse sank in up to the girths, and he observed to the boy, “I thought you said that this bog had a hard bottom.” “So it has,” answered the latter, “but you have not got half way to it yet.” So it is with the bogs and quicksands of society; but he is an old boy that knows it. Only what is thought, said, or done at a certain rare coincidence is good. I would not be one of those who will foolishly drive a nail into mere lath and plastering; such a deed would keep me awake nights. Give me a hammer, and let me feel for the furring. Do not depend on the putty. Drive a nail home and clinch it so faithfully that you can wake up in the night and think of your work with satisfaction,—a work at which you would not be ashamed to invoke the Muse. So will help you God, and so only. Every nail driven should be as another rivet in the machine of the universe, you carrying on the work.

I live in the corner of a heavy wall, made with a bit of bell metal mixed in. Often, during my midday break, I hear a mix of sounds from outside. It’s the chatter of my peers. My neighbors share stories about their encounters with notable people and who they met at dinner parties; but I’m just as uninterested in these tales as I am in the latest news in the Daily Times. The discussions mostly revolve around fashion and manners, but a goose is still a goose, no matter how you dress it up. They talk about California and Texas, England and the Indies, about the Hon. Mr. —— from Georgia or Massachusetts, all temporary phenomena, until I feel like jumping out of their courtyard like a Mameluke bey. I enjoy finding my own center—not parading in a grand procession but walking alongside the Creator of the universe, if I can—avoiding this restless, anxious, busy, trivial Nineteenth Century while taking a moment to pause and reflect as it passes by. What are people celebrating? They’re all on some planning committee, waiting for someone to make a speech. God is merely the president of the day, and Webster is his speaker. I love to weigh my options, to settle down, and gravitate toward what truly and rightly draws me in;—not to hang around the scale hoping to weigh less—it's not about hypothetical situations, but rather taking on the current reality; to follow the only path I can, the path that no one can prevent me from taking. I don’t find satisfaction in trying to build an arch before I’ve laid a solid foundation. Let’s not pretend we’re doing something trivial. There’s a solid foundation everywhere. We read that a traveler asked a boy if the swamp ahead had a hard bottom. The boy said it did. But soon the traveler’s horse sank deep, and he said to the boy, “I thought you said this bog had a hard bottom.” “It does,” the boy replied, “but you’re not halfway to it yet.” It’s the same with the swamps and quicksand of society; only the wise ones recognize it. Only what is thoughtfully considered, said, or done in rare moments is worthwhile. I wouldn’t want to be one of those who foolishly hammer a nail into flimsy walls; doing so would keep me up at night. Hand me a hammer, and let me find something solid to nail into. Don’t rely on the putty. Drive a nail deep and secure it securely enough so that you can wake up at night and think back on your work with pride—a work that you would feel comfortable asking the Muse to inspire. So help you God, and only in that way. Every nail driven should act like another rivet in the grand machine of the universe that you’re helping to build.

Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth. I sat at a table where were rich food and wine in abundance, and obsequious attendance, but sincerity and truth were not; and I went away hungry from the inhospitable board. The hospitality was as cold as the ices. I thought that there was no need of ice to freeze them. They talked to me of the age of the wine and the fame of the vintage; but I thought of an older, a newer, and purer wine, of a more glorious vintage, which they had not got, and could not buy. The style, the house and grounds and “entertainment” pass for nothing with me. I called on the king, but he made me wait in his hall, and conducted like a man incapacitated for hospitality. There was a man in my neighborhood who lived in a hollow tree. His manners were truly regal. I should have done better had I called on him.

Instead of love, money, or fame, give me truth. I sat at a table filled with plenty of rich food and wine, and with overly attentive servers, but there was no sincerity or truth; I left that unfriendly feast feeling unsatisfied. The hospitality was as cold as the desserts. I felt there was no need for ice to chill their hearts. They talked to me about the age of the wine and the reputation of the vintage; but I thought about a different kind of wine, one that was older, fresher, and purer, from a more remarkable vintage, which they neither had nor could buy. The style, the house, the grounds, and the “hospitality” mean nothing to me. I visited the king, but he made me wait in his hall and treated me like someone who couldn't be gracious. There was a man in my neighborhood who lived in a hollow tree. His manners were truly noble. I would have been better off visiting him.

How long shall we sit in our porticoes practising idle and musty virtues, which any work would make impertinent? As if one were to begin the day with long-suffering, and hire a man to hoe his potatoes; and in the afternoon go forth to practise Christian meekness and charity with goodness aforethought! Consider the China pride and stagnant self-complacency of mankind. This generation inclines a little to congratulate itself on being the last of an illustrious line; and in Boston and London and Paris and Rome, thinking of its long descent, it speaks of its progress in art and science and literature with satisfaction. There are the Records of the Philosophical Societies, and the public Eulogies of Great Men! It is the good Adam contemplating his own virtue. “Yes, we have done great deeds, and sung divine songs, which shall never die,”—that is, as long as we can remember them. The learned societies and great men of Assyria,—where are they? What youthful philosophers and experimentalists we are! There is not one of my readers who has yet lived a whole human life. These may be but the spring months in the life of the race. If we have had the seven-years’ itch, we have not seen the seventeen-year locust yet in Concord. We are acquainted with a mere pellicle of the globe on which we live. Most have not delved six feet beneath the surface, nor leaped as many above it. We know not where we are. Beside, we are sound asleep nearly half our time. Yet we esteem ourselves wise, and have an established order on the surface. Truly, we are deep thinkers, we are ambitious spirits! As I stand over the insect crawling amid the pine needles on the forest floor, and endeavoring to conceal itself from my sight, and ask myself why it will cherish those humble thoughts, and hide its head from me who might, perhaps, be its benefactor, and impart to its race some cheering information, I am reminded of the greater Benefactor and Intelligence that stands over me the human insect.

How long are we going to sit around in our porches, practicing outdated and pointless virtues that any real work would make ridiculous? It's like starting the day by being patient while hiring someone to hoe their potatoes, and then in the afternoon going out to show Christian kindness and charity with good intentions! Look at the pride and complacency of humanity. This generation tends to congratulate itself for being the last in a long line of notable ancestors; in places like Boston, London, Paris, and Rome, reflecting on this legacy, it talks about its advancements in art, science, and literature with pride. There are the records from Philosophical Societies, and the public praises of Great Men! It's like good old Adam admiring his own virtue. “Yes, we’ve accomplished great things and sung divine songs that will never fade,”—that is, as long as we can remember them. What happened to the learned societies and great men of Assyria? Where are those youthful philosophers and experimenters? None of my readers have lived an entire human lifespan yet. These may be just the early months in the life of our species. If we've experienced the seven-year itch, we haven't seen the seventeen-year locust in Concord yet. We only know a thin layer of the world we inhabit. Most people haven’t dug six feet underground or jumped six feet up. We have no real idea of where we are. Plus, we’re practically asleep for half our lives. Yet, we consider ourselves wise, and we maintain a stable order on the surface. Truly, we think deeply and aspire to great things! As I stand over the insect crawling among the pine needles on the forest floor, trying to hide from me, I wonder why it clings to its humble existence and keeps its head down from someone who could potentially help it with some uplifting information. This makes me think of the greater Benefactor and Intelligence that watches over me, the human insect.

There is an incessant influx of novelty into the world, and yet we tolerate incredible dulness. I need only suggest what kind of sermons are still listened to in the most enlightened countries. There are such words as joy and sorrow, but they are only the burden of a psalm, sung with a nasal twang, while we believe in the ordinary and mean. We think that we can change our clothes only. It is said that the British Empire is very large and respectable, and that the United States are a first-rate power. We do not believe that a tide rises and falls behind every man which can float the British Empire like a chip, if he should ever harbor it in his mind. Who knows what sort of seventeen-year locust will next come out of the ground? The government of the world I live in was not framed, like that of Britain, in after-dinner conversations over the wine.

There's a nonstop flow of new ideas in the world, yet we still put up with incredible boredom. I only need to point out what kind of sermons are still heard in the most progressive countries. Words like joy and sorrow exist, but they’re just the weight of a psalm, sung with a nasal tone, while we focus on the ordinary and mediocre. We think we can only change our appearance. People say the British Empire is vast and respectable, and that the United States is a top-tier power. We don’t believe that a wave rises and falls within every person that could lift the British Empire like a piece of debris, if they ever considered it. Who knows what kind of seventeen-year cicada will emerge next? The government of the world I live in wasn’t created, like Britain’s, during casual conversations over drinks.

The life in us is like the water in the river. It may rise this year higher than man has ever known it, and flood the parched uplands; even this may be the eventful year, which will drown out all our muskrats. It was not always dry land where we dwell. I see far inland the banks which the stream anciently washed, before science began to record its freshets. Every one has heard the story which has gone the rounds of New England, of a strong and beautiful bug which came out of the dry leaf of an old table of apple-tree wood, which had stood in a farmer’s kitchen for sixty years, first in Connecticut, and afterward in Massachusetts,—from an egg deposited in the living tree many years earlier still, as appeared by counting the annual layers beyond it; which was heard gnawing out for several weeks, hatched perchance by the heat of an urn. Who does not feel his faith in a resurrection and immortality strengthened by hearing of this? Who knows what beautiful and winged life, whose egg has been buried for ages under many concentric layers of woodenness in the dead dry life of society, deposited at first in the alburnum of the green and living tree, which has been gradually converted into the semblance of its well-seasoned tomb,—heard perchance gnawing out now for years by the astonished family of man, as they sat round the festive board,—may unexpectedly come forth from amidst society’s most trivial and handselled furniture, to enjoy its perfect summer life at last!

The life within us is like the water in a river. It might rise this year higher than anyone has ever seen and flood the dry land; this could be the year that drowns all our muskrats. It wasn’t always dry land where we live. I can see far inland the banks that the stream used to wash before scientists started keeping track of its floods. Everyone has heard the story that’s been told around New England about a strong and beautiful bug that came out of a dry leaf from an old apple-tree table that had been in a farmer’s kitchen for sixty years, first in Connecticut and then in Massachusetts—from an egg laid in the living tree many years before, as shown by counting the annual rings; it was heard gnawing for several weeks, possibly warmed by the heat of a urn. Who doesn’t feel their belief in resurrection and immortality strengthened by hearing this? Who knows what beautiful, winged life, whose egg has been buried for ages under many layers of wood in the dead, dry life of society, originally laid in the soft wood of a green, living tree, which has slowly turned into the appearance of its well-seasoned tomb—and is perhaps now gnawing its way out for years, surprising the human family as they gather around the festive table—might unexpectedly emerge from society’s most mundane and well-used furniture to finally enjoy its perfect summer life!

I do not say that John or Jonathan will realize all this; but such is the character of that morrow which mere lapse of time can never make to dawn. The light which puts out our eyes is darkness to us. Only that day dawns to which we are awake. There is more day to dawn. The sun is but a morning star.

I’m not saying that John or Jonathan will understand all of this; but that’s just how the future is—time alone won’t bring it about. The light that blinds us is darkness for us. Only the day we’re aware of really begins. There is more to come. The sun is just a morning star.





THE END

ON THE DUTY OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

I heartily accept the motto,—“That government is best which governs least;” and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe—“That government is best which governs not at all;” and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient. The objections which have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army is only an arm of the standing government. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it. Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for, in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure.

I completely agree with the motto, "The best government is the one that governs least," and I wish we would put it into practice more quickly and systematically. In reality, it leads to another belief I hold: "The best government is the one that doesn't govern at all." When people are ready for it, that will be the kind of government they will have. Government is, at best, just a means to an end; most governments tend to be ineffective, and all governments can be ineffective at times. The concerns raised against a standing army, which are numerous and significant, also apply to a standing government. The standing army is simply an extension of the standing government. The government itself, which is merely the way people choose to carry out their will, is just as prone to misuse and corruption before the people can act through it. Look at the current Mexican war, driven by a relatively small group of individuals using the standing government as their tool; initially, the people wouldn't have agreed to this action.

This American government,—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity? It has not the vitality and force of a single living man; for a single man can bend it to his will. It is a sort of wooden gun to the people themselves; and, if ever they should use it in earnest as a real one against each other, it will surely split. But it is not the less necessary for this; for the people must have some complicated machinery or other, and hear its din, to satisfy that idea of government which they have. Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed on, even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. It is excellent, we must all allow; yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way. For government is an expedient, by which men would fain succeed in letting one another alone; and, as has been said, when it is most expedient, the governed are most let alone by it. Trade and commerce, if they were not made of India rubber, would never manage to bounce over obstacles which legislators are continually putting in their way; and, if one were to judge these men wholly by the effects of their actions, and not partly by their intentions, they would deserve to be classed and punished with those mischievous persons who put obstructions on the railroads.

This American government—what is it but a recent tradition trying to pass itself down unchanged to the future, while constantly losing some of its integrity? It doesn’t have the life and strength of a single individual; because an individual can easily manipulate it to their will. It's like a wooden gun to the people themselves; and if they ever actually used it seriously as a real weapon against one another, it would definitely break. But it is still necessary for this reason; people need some complicated system or other and to hear its noise, to satisfy their idea of government. This shows how effectively people can be deceived, even trick themselves, for their own benefit. It's impressive, we all have to admit; yet this government has never actually promoted any initiative except for how quickly it gets out of the way. It doesn’t keep the country free. It doesn’t help settle the West. It doesn’t provide education. The character inherent in the American people has accomplished all that has been done; and they would have achieved even more if the government hadn’t sometimes impeded their progress. Government is a means by which people hope to let each other alone; and, as has been said, when it is most effective, the governed are left most alone by it. Trade and commerce, if they weren’t so flexible, would never be able to overcome the obstacles that lawmakers are constantly putting in their path; and if one judged these individuals solely by the results of their actions, rather than partially by their intentions, they would deserve to be categorized and punished along with those harmful people who interfere with railroads.

But, to speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it.

But, to be practical and as a citizen, unlike those who identify as anti-government individuals, I ask not for no government right away, but for a better government right now. Let everyone express what type of government they would respect, and that will be a step towards achieving it.

After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted, and for a long period continue, to rule, is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases can not be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which the majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?—in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume, is to do at any time what I think right. It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience. Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice. A common and natural result of an undue respect for the law is, that you may see a file of soldiers, colonel, captain, corporal, privates, powder-monkeys and all, marching in admirable order over hill and dale to the wars, against their wills, aye, against their common sense and consciences, which makes it very steep marching indeed, and produces a palpitation of the heart. They have no doubt that it is a damnable business in which they are concerned; they are all peaceably inclined. Now, what are they? Men at all? or small movable forts and magazines, at the service of some unscrupulous man in power? Visit the Navy Yard, and behold a marine, such a man as an American government can make, or such as it can make a man with its black arts, a mere shadow and reminiscence of humanity, a man laid out alive and standing, and already, as one may say, buried under arms with funeral accompaniment, though it may be

After all, the basic reason why, when power is given to the people, a majority is allowed to rule for a long time isn't because they're most likely to be right or because it's fair to the minority, but because they're physically the strongest. But a government where the majority rules in every situation can't be based on justice, as even humans understand it. Is there really no way to have a government in which majorities don't essentially decide right and wrong, but rather individual conscience?—where majorities only address matters where the rule of practicality applies? Should citizens ever, even for a moment, hand over their conscience to the lawmakers? Why does every person have a conscience, then? I believe we should be human beings first and citizens second. It's more important to cultivate respect for what's right than just for the law. The only obligation I have the right to take on is to do what I believe is right at any given time. It's true that a corporation has no conscience; however, a group of conscientious individuals forms a corporation with a conscience. Laws never made people any more just; in fact, due to the respect for laws, even well-meaning individuals are often turned into agents of injustice. A common and natural outcome of an excessive respect for the law is that you might see a line of soldiers—colonel, captain, corporal, privates, and all—marching in perfect formation over hills and valleys to war, against their will, yes, against their common sense and consciences, which makes for very tough marching and causes heart palpitations. They have no doubt that they're involved in a terrible situation; they're all inclined towards peace. So, what are they? Humans at all? Or just small movable forts and supplies at the command of some unscrupulous powerful person? Visit the Navy Yard, and see a marine—a product of what the American government can create, or what it can turn someone into with its dark tactics—a mere shadow and memory of humanity, a man standing and yet already, you might say, buried in arms with funeral-like accompaniment, even though it may be...

“Not a drum was heard, not a funeral note,
    As his corpse to the ramparts we hurried;
Not a soldier discharged his farewell shot
    O’er the grave where our hero we buried.”

"Not a drum was heard, not a funeral note,
    As we rushed his body to the ramparts;
Not a soldier fired a farewell shot
    Over the grave where we laid our hero to rest."

The mass of men serve the State thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailers, constables, posse comitatus, &c. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well. Such command no more respect than men of straw, or a lump of dirt. They have the same sort of worth only as horses and dogs. Yet such as these even are commonly esteemed good citizens. Others, as most legislators, politicians, lawyers, ministers, and office-holders, serve the state chiefly with their heads; and, as they rarely make any moral distinctions, they are as likely to serve the devil, without intending it, as God. A very few, as heroes, patriots, martyrs, reformers in the great sense, and men, serve the State with their consciences also, and so necessarily resist it for the most part; and they are commonly treated by it as enemies. A wise man will only be useful as a man, and will not submit to be “clay,” and “stop a hole to keep the wind away,” but leave that office to his dust at least:

Most men serve the State not primarily as individuals but as machines, with their bodies. They make up the standing army, the militia, jailers, constables, and so on. In most cases, they don't exercise any judgment or moral sense; instead, they reduce themselves to the level of wood, earth, and stones, and it’s possible to create wooden figures that could serve the same purpose just as well. Such beings command no more respect than straw men or a pile of dirt. Their value is similar to that of horses and dogs. Still, these individuals are often considered good citizens. Others, like most legislators, politicians, lawyers, ministers, and office-holders, mainly serve the state with their minds; since they rarely make any moral distinctions, they're just as likely to inadvertently serve evil as they are to serve good. A very small number, like heroes, patriots, martyrs, reformers in the truest sense, and real human beings, serve the State with their consciences as well, which means they often have to resist it; as a result, they are usually treated as enemies. A wise person will only be useful as a human and won’t allow themselves to be “clay” or “plug a hole to keep the wind out,” but will leave that role to their remains at least:

“I am too high-born to be propertied,
To be a secondary at control,
Or useful serving-man and instrument
To any sovereign state throughout the world.”

“I'm too noble to be owned,
To be a subordinate in charge,
Or a useful servant and tool
For any ruling power around the world.”

He who gives himself entirely to his fellow-men appears to them useless and selfish; but he who gives himself partially to them is pronounced a benefactor and philanthropist.

The person who completely dedicates himself to others seems useless and selfish to them; but the one who only partially commits is seen as a benefactor and philanthropist.

How does it become a man to behave toward the American government today? I answer that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it. I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is the slave’s government also.

How should a man act toward the American government today? I say he cannot be connected with it without shame. I can’t for a second accept that political system as my government if it is also the slave’s government.

All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to and to resist the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now. But such was the case, they think, in the Revolution of ’75. If one were to tell me that this was a bad government because it taxed certain foreign commodities brought to its ports, it is most probable that I should not make an ado about it, for I can do without them: all machines have their friction; and possibly this does enough good to counter-balance the evil. At any rate, it is a great evil to make a stir about it. But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us not have such a machine any longer. In other words, when a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law, I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize. What makes this duty the more urgent is that fact, that the country so overrun is not our own, but ours is the invading army.

All people recognize the right to revolt; that is, the right to refuse loyalty to and resist the government when its tyranny or incompetence becomes unbearable. But almost everyone claims that this isn’t the case now. They believe it was the case during the Revolution of ’75. If someone told me this is a bad government because it taxes certain foreign goods brought to its ports, I probably wouldn’t make a fuss about it, since I can do without them: all systems have their drawbacks; and maybe this does enough good to make up for the bad. In any case, it’s a significant problem to make a big deal about it. However, when the friction becomes part of the system, and oppression and theft are organized, I say we shouldn’t tolerate such a system any longer. In other words, when one-sixth of the population of a nation that claims to be a refuge for liberty are enslaved, and an entire country is unjustly invaded and taken over by a foreign army, subject to military law, I believe it’s not too soon for decent people to rise up and instigate a revolution. What makes this duty even more pressing is the fact that the country being invaded is not our own, but ours is the invading army.

Paley, a common authority with many on moral questions, in his chapter on the “Duty of Submission to Civil Government,” resolves all civil obligation into expediency; and he proceeds to say, “that so long as the interest of the whole society requires it, that is, so long as the established government cannot be resisted or changed without public inconveniency, it is the will of God that the established government be obeyed, and no longer.”—“This principle being admitted, the justice of every particular case of resistance is reduced to a computation of the quantity of the danger and grievance on the one side, and of the probability and expense of redressing it on the other.” Of this, he says, every man shall judge for himself. But Paley appears never to have contemplated those cases to which the rule of expediency does not apply, in which a people, as well as an individual, must do justice, cost what it may. If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself. This, according to Paley, would be inconvenient. But he that would save his life, in such a case, shall lose it. This people must cease to hold slaves, and to make war on Mexico, though it cost them their existence as a people.

Paley, a common source for many on moral issues, in his chapter on the “Duty of Submission to Civil Government,” reduces all civil obligations to practicality. He states, “as long as the interests of society require it, meaning that as long as the established government cannot be challenged or changed without causing public inconvenience, it is God's will that the established government should be obeyed, and not beyond that.” He continues, “Once this principle is accepted, the justice of any specific case of resistance comes down to weighing the level of danger and grievance on one side against the likelihood and cost of fixing it on the other.” He asserts that every individual should make this judgment for themselves. However, Paley seems to overlook situations where the rule of practicality doesn't apply, where both individuals and the community must pursue justice, regardless of the cost. If I have unjustly taken a plank from a drowning man, I must give it back to him even if it means I drown myself. According to Paley, this would be inconvenient. But whoever tries to save their life in such a situation risks losing it. This society must stop holding slaves and making war on Mexico, even if it means risking their existence as a people.

In their practice, nations agree with Paley; but does anyone think that Massachusetts does exactly what is right at the present crisis?

In their practice, countries align with Paley; but does anyone believe that Massachusetts is doing the right thing in the current situation?

“A drab of state, a cloth-o’-silver slut,
To have her train borne up, and her soul trail in the dirt.”

“A dull state dress, a silver-cloth whore,
To have her train lifted up, while her spirit drags in the mud.”

Practically speaking, the opponents to a reform in Massachusetts are not a hundred thousand politicians at the South, but a hundred thousand merchants and farmers here, who are more interested in commerce and agriculture than they are in humanity, and are not prepared to do justice to the slave and to Mexico, cost what it may. I quarrel not with far-off foes, but with those who, near at home, co-operate with, and do the bidding of those far away, and without whom the latter would be harmless. We are accustomed to say, that the mass of men are unprepared; but improvement is slow, because the few are not materially wiser or better than the many. It is not so important that many should be as good as you, as that there be some absolute goodness somewhere; for that will leaven the whole lump. There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin, sit down with their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing; who even postpone the question of freedom to the question of free-trade, and quietly read the prices-current along with the latest advices from Mexico, after dinner, and, it may be, fall asleep over them both. What is the price-current of an honest man and patriot today? They hesitate, and they regret, and sometimes they petition; but they do nothing in earnest and with effect. They will wait, well disposed, for others to remedy the evil, that they may no longer have it to regret. At most, they give only a cheap vote, and a feeble countenance and Godspeed, to the right, as it goes by them. There are nine hundred and ninety-nine patrons of virtue to one virtuous man; but it is easier to deal with the real possessor of a thing than with the temporary guardian of it.

Practically speaking, the opponents of reform in Massachusetts aren't a hundred thousand politicians in the South, but rather a hundred thousand merchants and farmers right here, who care more about commerce and agriculture than about humanity, and are unwilling to treat the slave or Mexico with justice, no matter the cost. I'm not arguing with distant enemies, but with those who, close to home, collaborate with and follow the orders of those far away, without whom the latter would be powerless. We often say that most people are unprepared; yet progress is slow because the few aren't significantly wiser or better than the many. It's not as crucial that many are as good as you, but rather that there is some absolute goodness somewhere, because that will influence everyone. There are thousands who, in theory, oppose slavery and the war, yet in reality, do nothing to stop them; who, considering themselves to be the descendants of Washington and Franklin, sit idly with their hands in their pockets, claiming they don't know what to do while they do nothing. They even prioritize the issue of free trade over freedom, calmly reading market prices alongside the latest news from Mexico after dinner, and possibly nod off over both. What’s the worth of an honest man and patriot today? They hesitate, feel regret, and sometimes send petitions, but they take no serious action with real impact. They wait, with good intentions, for others to fix the problem, so they can stop feeling guilty about it. At most, they offer a token vote and a weak show of support to the just cause as it passes by. There are nine hundred and ninety-nine supporters of virtue for every one virtuous individual; yet it's easier to engage with someone who truly possesses something than with someone who merely acts as a temporary custodian.

All voting is a sort of gaming, like chequers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it, a playing with right and wrong, with moral questions; and betting naturally accompanies it. The character of the voters is not staked. I cast my vote, perchance, as I think right; but I am not vitally concerned that that right should prevail. I am willing to leave it to the majority. Its obligation, therefore, never exceeds that of expediency. Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it. It is only expressing to men feebly your desire that it should prevail. A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority. There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men. When the majority shall at length vote for the abolition of slavery, it will be because they are indifferent to slavery, or because there is but little slavery left to be abolished by their vote. They will then be the only slaves. Only his vote can hasten the abolition of slavery who asserts his own freedom by his vote.

All voting is like a game, similar to checkers or backgammon, but with a slight moral aspect—it's about playing with right and wrong, dealing with moral questions; and betting comes naturally with it. The character of the voters isn't at stake. I cast my vote based on what I think is right, but I’m not deeply invested in whether that right actually wins. I'm okay with leaving it up to the majority. So, its obligation is really just about what's practical. Even voting *for the right* doesn't actually do anything for it. It simply weakly shows others that you want it to succeed. A wise person won't leave what's right up to chance, nor will they hope it wins just because of what most people think. There's not much virtue in the actions of large groups. When the majority eventually votes to end slavery, it'll be because they're indifferent to it, or because there's hardly any left to stop with their vote. *They* will then be the only ones enslaved. Only *his* vote can speed up the end of slavery for someone who claims their own freedom with that vote.

I hear of a convention to be held at Baltimore, or elsewhere, for the selection of a candidate for the Presidency, made up chiefly of editors, and men who are politicians by profession; but I think, what is it to any independent, intelligent, and respectable man what decision they may come to, shall we not have the advantage of his wisdom and honesty, nevertheless? Can we not count upon some independent votes? Are there not many individuals in the country who do not attend conventions? But no: I find that the respectable man, so called, has immediately drifted from his position, and despairs of his country, when his country has more reasons to despair of him. He forthwith adopts one of the candidates thus selected as the only available one, thus proving that he is himself available for any purposes of the demagogue. His vote is of no more worth than that of any unprincipled foreigner or hireling native, who may have been bought. Oh for a man who is a man, and, as my neighbor says, has a bone in his back which you cannot pass your hand through! Our statistics are at fault: the population has been returned too large. How many men are there to a square thousand miles in the country? Hardly one. Does not America offer any inducement for men to settle here? The American has dwindled into an Odd Fellow,—one who may be known by the development of his organ of gregariousness, and a manifest lack of intellect and cheerful self-reliance; whose first and chief concern, on coming into the world, is to see that the alms-houses are in good repair; and, before yet he has lawfully donned the virile garb, to collect a fund for the support of the widows and orphans that may be; who, in short, ventures to live only by the aid of the Mutual Insurance company, which has promised to bury him decently.

I've heard about a convention happening in Baltimore, or somewhere else, to choose a candidate for the Presidency, mostly involving editors and professional politicians. But I wonder, what does it matter to any independent, intelligent, and respectable person what they decide? Aren't we still able to benefit from their wisdom and integrity? Can we not expect some independent votes? Aren't there plenty of people in the country who don't go to conventions? Yet, I find that the so-called respectable person quickly abandons their position and loses hope for the country, even though the country has more reasons to lose hope in them. They promptly choose one of the candidates that were picked as the only available option, proving that they themselves are available for any manipulative agenda. Their vote carries no more weight than that of any unprincipled foreigner or a native sellout who may have been bought. Oh, for a person who is a man, and as my neighbor says, has a backbone that can't be easily intimidated! Our statistics are off: the population figures are inflated. How many men are there per square thousand miles in this country? Hardly one. Doesn’t America offer any real incentive for men to settle here? The American has become an Odd Fellow—someone identifiable by their social tendencies, along with a clear lack of intelligence and independent spirit; whose main concern upon entering the world is ensuring that the welfare system is in good shape; and before they’ve even fully embraced adulthood, they start raising funds to support potential widows and orphans; who, in short, only dares to live with the help of the Mutual Insurance company, which has promised to give them a decent burial.

It is not a man’s duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to engage him; but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and, if he gives it no thought longer, not to give it practically his support. If I devote myself to other pursuits and contemplations, I must first see, at least, that I do not pursue them sitting upon another man’s shoulders. I must get off him first, that he may pursue his contemplations too. See what gross inconsistency is tolerated. I have heard some of my townsmen say, “I should like to have them order me out to help put down an insurrection of the slaves, or to march to Mexico,—see if I would go;” and yet these very men have each, directly by their allegiance, and so indirectly, at least, by their money, furnished a substitute. The soldier is applauded who refuses to serve in an unjust war by those who do not refuse to sustain the unjust government which makes the war; is applauded by those whose own act and authority he disregards and sets at naught; as if the State were penitent to that degree that it hired one to scourge it while it sinned, but not to that degree that it left off sinning for a moment. Thus, under the name of Order and Civil Government, we are all made at last to pay homage to and support our own meanness. After the first blush of sin, comes its indifference; and from immoral it becomes, as it were, unmoral, and not quite unnecessary to that life which we have made.

It's not a man's duty, by default, to dedicate himself to fixing any wrong, even the biggest one; he can have other interests that occupy his time. However, he should at least make sure he isn't supporting it, and if he doesn’t think about it anymore, he shouldn't be backing it up. If I choose to focus on other activities and thoughts, I first need to ensure I'm not doing it at another person's expense. I have to get off their back so they can think for themselves too. Look at the blatant inconsistency we accept. I've heard some of my neighbors say, “I’d love for someone to order me to help crush a slave uprising or to fight in Mexico—let’s see if I’d actually go;” yet these same people have each, through their allegiance and indirectly through their money, provided a substitute. The soldier who refuses to fight in an unjust war is praised by those who continue to support the unjust government that started the war; they cheer him while ignoring the very act and authority he challenges; it’s as if the State is so remorseful that it hires someone to punish it while it carries on with its wrongdoing, but isn’t remorseful enough to stop sinning, even for a moment. Thus, under the guise of Order and Civil Government, we’re all eventually made to support our own pettiness. After the initial shock of sin, comes indifference; and what was once immoral turns, in a sense, into unmoral, and not entirely unnecessary to the life we've created.

The broadest and most prevalent error requires the most disinterested virtue to sustain it. The slight reproach to which the virtue of patriotism is commonly liable, the noble are most likely to incur. Those who, while they disapprove of the character and measures of a government, yield to it their allegiance and support, are undoubtedly its most conscientious supporters, and so frequently the most serious obstacles to reform. Some are petitioning the State to dissolve the Union, to disregard the requisitions of the President. Why do they not dissolve it themselves,—the union between themselves and the State,—and refuse to pay their quota into its treasury? Do not they stand in same relation to the State, that the State does to the Union? And have not the same reasons prevented the State from resisting the Union, which have prevented them from resisting the State?

The biggest and most common mistake requires the most selfless virtue to maintain it. The slight criticism that comes with the virtue of patriotism is most likely to affect the noblest among us. Those who disapprove of a government's character and actions but still pledge their loyalty and support are often its most dedicated backers, and they can frequently be the biggest roadblocks to change. Some are asking the State to break apart from the Union and ignore the President’s demands. Why don't they just break away themselves—from both the State and refuse to pay their share into its treasury? Don't they have the same relationship to the State that the State has to the Union? And haven’t the same reasons stopped the State from resisting the Union, which have also stopped them from resisting the State?

How can a man be satisfied to entertain an opinion merely, and enjoy it? Is there any enjoyment in it, if his opinion is that he is aggrieved? If you are cheated out of a single dollar by your neighbor, you do not rest satisfied with knowing you are cheated, or with saying that you are cheated, or even with petitioning him to pay you your due; but you take effectual steps at once to obtain the full amount, and see that you are never cheated again. Action from principle,—the perception and the performance of right,—changes things and relations; it is essentially revolutionary, and does not consist wholly with anything which was. It not only divided states and churches, it divides families; aye, it divides the individual, separating the diabolical in him from the divine.

How can a man be satisfied just to have an opinion and enjoy it? Is there any real enjoyment in it if his opinion is that he's been wronged? If your neighbor cheats you out of a dollar, you won't be content just knowing you've been cheated or by saying you've been cheated or even by asking him to pay you back. You take immediate action to get the full amount back and to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Acting on principles—the understanding and doing of what’s right—changes situations and relationships; it's fundamentally revolutionary and doesn’t align with anything that was before. It not only splits states and churches, it splits families; in fact, it divides the individual, separating the evil within him from the good.

Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once? Men generally, under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait until they have persuaded the majority to alter them. They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse. Why is it not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform? Why does it not cherish its wise minority? Why does it cry and resist before it is hurt? Why does it not encourage its citizens to be on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would have them? Why does it always crucify Christ, and excommunicate Copernicus and Luther, and pronounce Washington and Franklin rebels?

Unjust laws exist: should we just obey them, or should we try to change them and obey them until we succeed, or should we break them right away? Generally, people under a government like this think they should wait until they can convince the majority to change them. They believe that if they resist, the consequences will be worse than the problem itself. But it’s the government’s fault that the consequences are worse than the problem. It makes it worse. Why doesn’t it try harder to anticipate and promote reform? Why doesn’t it value its wise minority? Why does it panic and fight back before being attacked? Why doesn’t it encourage its citizens to point out its flaws and do better than it allows them to? Why does it always persecute Christ, excommunicate Copernicus and Luther, and label Washington and Franklin as rebels?

One would think, that a deliberate and practical denial of its authority was the only offence never contemplated by government; else, why has it not assigned its definite, its suitable and proportionate penalty? If a man who has no property refuses but once to earn nine shillings for the State, he is put in prison for a period unlimited by any law that I know, and determined only by the discretion of those who placed him there; but if he should steal ninety times nine shillings from the State, he is soon permitted to go at large again.

One would assume that a conscious and practical rejection of its authority is the only offense the government never considered; otherwise, why hasn't it established a clear, appropriate, and proportional penalty? If a person without any property declines to earn nine shillings for the State even once, they're thrown in prison for an undetermined period as far as I know, with the length decided solely by those who locked them up; but if they steal ninety times nine shillings from the State, they're quickly allowed to walk free again.

If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth,—certainly the machine will wear out. If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.

If the injustice is just part of the necessary friction in the government machine, then let it be; maybe it will smooth out—though the machine will definitely wear out. If the injustice has its own spring, pulley, rope, or crank, then you might want to think about whether the solution could be worse than the problem. But if it’s such that it requires you to be the one doing injustice to someone else, then I say break the law. Let your life be a resistance to stop the machine. What I need to do is ensure that I don’t contribute to the wrong that I criticize.

As for adopting the ways which the State has provided for remedying the evil, I know not of such ways. They take too much time, and a man’s life will be gone. I have other affairs to attend to. I came into this world, not chiefly to make this a good place to live in, but to live in it, be it good or bad. A man has not every thing to do, but something; and because he cannot do every thing, it is not necessary that he should do something wrong. It is not my business to be petitioning the Governor or the Legislature any more than it is theirs to petition me; and, if they should not hear my petition, what should I do then? But in this case the State has provided no way: its very Constitution is the evil. This may seem to be harsh and stubborn and unconcilliatory; but it is to treat with the utmost kindness and consideration the only spirit that can appreciate or deserves it. So is all change for the better, like birth and death which convulse the body.

I don’t know of any solutions the State has offered to fix the problem—it all takes too long, and life is short. I have my own priorities. I came into this world not just to make it a better place, but to actually live here, whether it’s good or bad. A person can’t do everything; they can only do something. Just because someone can’t do everything doesn’t mean they should do something wrong. It’s not my job to petition the Governor or the Legislature any more than it is theirs to petition me. And if they ignore my petition, what can I do about it? In this case, the State hasn’t provided a solution; its very Constitution is the problem. This might seem harsh and unyielding, but it’s meant to show kindness and consideration for the only spirit that can truly appreciate or deserves it. All change for the better is like birth and death, which stir the body.

I do not hesitate to say, that those who call themselves abolitionists should at once effectually withdraw their support, both in person and property, from the government of Massachusetts, and not wait till they constitute a majority of one, before they suffer the right to prevail through them. I think that it is enough if they have God on their side, without waiting for that other one. Moreover, any man more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one already.

I want to be clear that those who call themselves abolitionists should immediately withdraw their support, both personally and financially, from the government of Massachusetts, and not wait until they have a majority of even one person before they let what is right come through them. I believe it's enough to have God on their side without waiting for anyone else. Besides, any person who is more right than those around him is already a majority of one.

I meet this American government, or its representative, the State government, directly, and face to face, once a year, no more, in the person of its tax-gatherer; this is the only mode in which a man situated as I am necessarily meets it; and it then says distinctly, Recognize me; and the simplest, the most effectual, and, in the present posture of affairs, the indispensablest mode of treating with it on this head, of expressing your little satisfaction with and love for it, is to deny it then. My civil neighbor, the tax-gatherer, is the very man I have to deal with,—for it is, after all, with men and not with parchment that I quarrel,—and he has voluntarily chosen to be an agent of the government. How shall he ever know well what he is and does as an officer of the government, or as a man, until he is obliged to consider whether he shall treat me, his neighbor, for whom he has respect, as a neighbor and well-disposed man, or as a maniac and disturber of the peace, and see if he can get over this obstruction to his neighborliness without a ruder and more impetuous thought or speech corresponding with his action? I know this well, that if one thousand, if one hundred, if ten men whom I could name,—if ten honest men only,—aye, if one HONEST man, in this State of Massachusetts, ceasing to hold slaves, were actually to withdraw from this copartnership, and be locked up in the county jail therefor, it would be the abolition of slavery in America. For it matters not how small the beginning may seem to be: what is once well done is done for ever. But we love better to talk about it: that we say is our mission. Reform keeps many scores of newspapers in its service, but not one man. If my esteemed neighbor, the State’s ambassador, who will devote his days to the settlement of the question of human rights in the Council Chamber, instead of being threatened with the prisons of Carolina, were to sit down the prisoner of Massachusetts, that State which is so anxious to foist the sin of slavery upon her sister,—though at present she can discover only an act of inhospitality to be the ground of a quarrel with her,—the Legislature would not wholly waive the subject of the following winter.

I only interact with the American government, or its representative, the State government, once a year, face to face, through its tax collector. This is the only way someone in my position meets it. At that meeting, it clearly demands, "Acknowledge me." The simplest, most effective, and absolutely necessary way to respond, given the current situation, is to refuse it. My neighbor, the tax collector, is the exact person I need to engage with—because in the end, my conflict is with people, not just paperwork—and he has chosen to be an agent of the government. How will he ever truly understand what he is doing as a government official or as a person until he has to decide whether to treat me, his respectful neighbor, as a friend or as a troublemaker? He also needs to figure out how to overcome this challenge to his neighborliness without resorting to rudeness or aggression that matches his actions. I'm certain that if even one thousand, one hundred, or just ten men I could name—if just ten honest men, or even one honest man in Massachusetts—were to stop supporting slavery and get imprisoned for it, that would end slavery in America. It doesn’t matter how small the action may seem; once something is done well, it lasts forever. But we prefer to talk about it: we say that’s our purpose. Reform keeps many newspapers going, but not a single true reformer. If my respected neighbor, representing the State, spent his days addressing human rights in the Council Chamber rather than facing threats of imprisonment in Carolina, and if he were instead to be imprisoned in Massachusetts—the state eager to blame slavery on others—even if she can currently only find an act of unfriendliness as her justification for conflict, the Legislature wouldn’t completely ignore the issue in the upcoming winter.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison. The proper place today, the only place which Massachusetts has provided for her freer and less desponding spirits, is in her prisons, to be put out and locked out of the State by her own act, as they have already put themselves out by their principles. It is there that the fugitive slave, and the Mexican prisoner on parole, and the Indian come to plead the wrongs of his race, should find them; on that separate, but more free and honorable ground, where the State places those who are not with her but against her,—the only house in a slave-state in which a free man can abide with honor. If any think that their influence would be lost there, and their voices no longer afflict the ear of the State, that they would not be as an enemy within its walls, they do not know by how much truth is stronger than error, nor how much more eloquently and effectively he can combat injustice who has experienced a little in his own person. Cast your whole vote, not a strip of paper merely, but your whole influence. A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax-bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible. If the tax-gatherer, or any other public officer, asks me, as one has done, “But what shall I do?” my answer is, “If you really wish to do any thing, resign your office.” When the subject has refused allegiance, and the officer has resigned his office, then the revolution is accomplished. But even suppose blood should flow. Is there not a sort of blood shed when the conscience is wounded? Through this wound a man’s real manhood and immortality flow out, and he bleeds to an everlasting death. I see this blood flowing now.

In a government that unfairly locks people up, the right place for a just person is also in prison. Today, the only place Massachusetts has set aside for her freer and less hopeless individuals is in her prisons, effectively shutting them out of the State by her own actions, just as they have chosen to stand apart by their beliefs. It's where the escaped slave, the Mexican prisoner on parole, and the Native American seeking justice for his people should find their allies; on that separate yet more liberated and honorable ground, where the State places those who are not with her but against her—the only place in a slave state where a free person can live with honor. If anyone believes their influence would vanish there and their voices would no longer reach the State, thinking they wouldn’t be a threat from within its walls, they underestimate how much stronger truth is than falsehood and how much more compelling someone can be in fighting injustice when they’ve faced it themselves. Cast your entire vote—not just a piece of paper but your full influence. A minority is powerless when it conforms to the majority; it isn't even a minority in that case, but it becomes unstoppable when it stands firm against the weight of the majority. If the choice is to keep all just individuals in prison or to end war and slavery, the State will clearly choose the former. If a thousand people were to refuse to pay their taxes this year, it wouldn’t be a violent or bloody act, unlike paying them and allowing the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, essentially, the definition of a peaceful revolution, if such a thing is possible. If a tax collector, or any public official, asks me, as one has, “But what should I do?” my response is, “If you really want to take action, resign from your position.” When the citizen refuses compliance and the officer resigns, then the revolution is complete. But even if blood should be spilled, isn’t there a kind of bloodshed when the conscience is injured? Through this injury, a person’s true humanity and immortality leak away, and he suffers a lasting death. I see this blood flowing now.

I have contemplated the imprisonment of the offender, rather than the seizure of his goods,—though both will serve the same purpose,—because they who assert the purest right, and consequently are most dangerous to a corrupt State, commonly have not spent much time in accumulating property. To such the State renders comparatively small service, and a slight tax is wont to appear exorbitant, particularly if they are obliged to earn it by special labor with their hands. If there were one who lived wholly without the use of money, the State itself would hesitate to demand it of him. But the rich man—not to make any invidious comparison—is always sold to the institution which makes him rich. Absolutely speaking, the more money, the less virtue; for money comes between a man and his objects, and obtains them for him; it was certainly no great virtue to obtain it. It puts to rest many questions which he would otherwise be taxed to answer; while the only new question which it puts is the hard but superfluous one, how to spend it. Thus his moral ground is taken from under his feet. The opportunities of living are diminished in proportion as what are called the “means” are increased. The best thing a man can do for his culture when he is rich is to endeavor to carry out those schemes which he entertained when he was poor. Christ answered the Herodians according to their condition. “Show me the tribute-money,” said he;—and one took a penny out of his pocket;—if you use money which has the image of Cæsar on it, and which he has made current and valuable, that is, if you are men of the State, and gladly enjoy the advantages of Cæsar’s government, then pay him back some of his own when he demands it; “Render therefore to Cæsar that which is Cæsar’s and to God those things which are God’s,”—leaving them no wiser than before as to which was which; for they did not wish to know.

I've thought about imprisoning the offender instead of seizing his possessions—though both would achieve the same goal—because those who defend the truest rights, and are therefore most threatening to a corrupt state, usually haven't spent much time amassing wealth. The state provides them relatively little support, and a small tax often seems outrageous, especially if they have to earn it through hard labor. If someone lived entirely without money, the state would likely hesitate to demand it from them. But the wealthy—without any intention of creating envy—are typically bound to the system that made them rich. In general, the more money you have, the less virtue you possess; money stands between a person and their desires, conveniently obtaining things for them, so acquiring money isn't necessarily virtuous. It resolves many questions that would otherwise challenge them, while the only new dilemma it introduces is the difficult yet trivial one of how to spend it. This undermines their moral foundation. The chances for a fulfilling life decrease as what are termed “means” increase. The best thing a wealthy person can do for their personal growth is to follow through on the ideas they had when they were poor. Christ responded to the Herodians based on their situation. “Show me the tribute money,” he said; and one pulled out a penny;—if you are using money that bears Caesar’s image and which he has made valid and valuable, that is, if you are part of the state and enjoy the benefits of Caesar’s rule, then give him back some of what is his when he asks for it; “Render therefore to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what belongs to God,”—leaving them no wiser than before about which is which; they didn’t really want to know.

When I converse with the freest of my neighbors, I perceive that, whatever they may say about the magnitude and seriousness of the question, and their regard for the public tranquillity, the long and the short of the matter is, that they cannot spare the protection of the existing government, and they dread the consequences of disobedience to it to their property and families. For my own part, I should not like to think that I ever rely on the protection of the State. But, if I deny the authority of the State when it presents its tax-bill, it will soon take and waste all my property, and so harass me and my children without end. This is hard. This makes it impossible for a man to live honestly and at the same time comfortably in outward respects. It will not be worth the while to accumulate property; that would be sure to go again. You must hire or squat somewhere, and raise but a small crop, and eat that soon. You must live within yourself, and depend upon yourself, always tucked up and ready for a start, and not have many affairs. A man may grow rich in Turkey even, if he will be in all respects a good subject of the Turkish government. Confucius said,—“If a State is governed by the principles of reason, poverty and misery are subjects of shame; if a State is not governed by the principles of reason, riches and honors are the subjects of shame.” No: until I want the protection of Massachusetts to be extended to me in some distant southern port, where my liberty is endangered, or until I am bent solely on building up an estate at home by peaceful enterprise, I can afford to refuse allegiance to Massachusetts, and her right to my property and life. It costs me less in every sense to incur the penalty of disobedience to the State, than it would to obey. I should feel as if I were worth less in that case.

When I talk to the most independent of my neighbors, I realize that, no matter how much they emphasize the importance of the issue and their concern for public peace, the bottom line is that they can’t really let go of the protection that the current government provides, and they fear what might happen to their property and families if they disobey it. For me personally, I wouldn’t want to think that I ever depended on the State for protection. But if I challenge the State when it hands me a tax bill, it won’t take long before it seizes all my assets and constantly harasses me and my kids. That’s tough. It makes it nearly impossible for someone to live honestly while also being comfortable in everyday life. It won’t even be worth accumulating wealth; it would just end up disappearing again. You have to find a place to live or squat somewhere, grow a minimal amount of food, and eat it quickly. You should live simply, rely on yourself, always be prepared to leave, and not get too involved in many things. A person can grow wealthy even in Turkey, as long as they are a good citizen of the Turkish government. Confucius said, “If a State is governed by reason, poverty and misery are shameful; if a State is not governed by reason, wealth and honor are shameful.” No: until I need the protection of Massachusetts in some far-off southern port, where my freedom is at risk, or until I’m solely focused on building my wealth here through peaceful means, I can afford to reject Massachusetts and its claim to my property and life. For me, incurring the consequences of defying the State is less costly in every way than obeying it. I would feel like I’m worth less in that situation.

Some years ago, the State met me in behalf of the church, and commanded me to pay a certain sum toward the support of a clergyman whose preaching my father attended, but never I myself. “Pay it,” it said, “or be locked up in the jail.” I declined to pay. But, unfortunately, another man saw fit to pay it. I did not see why the schoolmaster should be taxed to support the priest, and not the priest the schoolmaster; for I was not the State’s schoolmaster, but I supported myself by voluntary subscription. I did not see why the lyceum should not present its tax-bill, and have the State to back its demand, as well as the church. However, at the request of the selectmen, I condescended to make some such statement as this in writing:—“Know all men by these presents, that I, Henry Thoreau, do not wish to be regarded as a member of any incorporated society which I have not joined.” This I gave to the town-clerk; and he has it. The State, having thus learned that I did not wish to be regarded as a member of that church, has never made a like demand on me since; though it said that it must adhere to its original presumption that time. If I had known how to name them, I should then have signed off in detail from all the societies which I never signed on to; but I did not know where to find such a complete list.

A few years ago, the State approached me on behalf of the church and ordered me to pay a certain amount to support a clergyman whose sermons my father attended but I never did. “Pay it,” they said, “or you'll be locked up in jail.” I refused to pay. Unfortunately, someone else chose to pay it. I didn't understand why the schoolmaster had to be taxed to support the priest and not the other way around; I wasn't the State's schoolmaster but supported myself through voluntary donations. I didn't see why the lyceum shouldn't be able to present its own tax bill and have the State back its demand, just like the church. However, at the request of the selectmen, I agreed to write something like this: “Know all men by these presents, that I, Henry Thoreau, do not wish to be considered a member of any incorporated society that I haven't joined.” I gave this to the town clerk, and he has it. Since the State found out that I didn’t want to be considered a member of that church, they haven’t made a similar demand of me since, even though they claimed they would stick to their original assumption for the time being. If I had known how to specify them, I would have then opted out of all the societies I never signed up for, but I didn't know where to find such a complete list.

I have paid no poll-tax for six years. I was put into a jail once on this account, for one night; and, as I stood considering the walls of solid stone, two or three feet thick, the door of wood and iron, a foot thick, and the iron grating which strained the light, I could not help being struck with the foolishness of that institution which treated me as if I were mere flesh and blood and bones, to be locked up. I wondered that it should have concluded at length that this was the best use it could put me to, and had never thought to avail itself of my services in some way. I saw that, if there was a wall of stone between me and my townsmen, there was a still more difficult one to climb or break through, before they could get to be as free as I was. I did nor for a moment feel confined, and the walls seemed a great waste of stone and mortar. I felt as if I alone of all my townsmen had paid my tax. They plainly did not know how to treat me, but behaved like persons who are underbred. In every threat and in every compliment there was a blunder; for they thought that my chief desire was to stand the other side of that stone wall. I could not but smile to see how industriously they locked the door on my meditations, which followed them out again without let or hindrance, and they were really all that was dangerous. As they could not reach me, they had resolved to punish my body; just as boys, if they cannot come at some person against whom they have a spite, will abuse his dog. I saw that the State was half-witted, that it was timid as a lone woman with her silver spoons, and that it did not know its friends from its foes, and I lost all my remaining respect for it, and pitied it.

I haven’t paid a poll tax in six years. Once, I was locked up for a night because of it. As I stood there, looking at the solid stone walls that were two or three feet thick, the heavy wooden and iron door that was a foot thick, and the iron grating that filtered the light, I couldn’t help but think how ridiculous the system was for treating me like just flesh and blood to be imprisoned. I was amazed that this was the best they could do with me and never thought to make use of my abilities in any way. I realized that even if there was a stone wall between me and my fellow townspeople, there was an even bigger barrier for them to overcome to gain the same freedom I had. I didn't feel trapped for a second; those walls seemed like a huge waste of stone and mortar. It felt like I was the only one in town who had paid my taxes. They clearly didn’t know how to handle me and acted like people with poor manners. Every threat and compliment was an awkward misstep because they thought my main wish was to be on the other side of that wall. I couldn’t help but smile at how hard they tried to lock me away from my thoughts, which followed them without any restrictions, and those thoughts were the real threat. Unable to reach me, they chose to punish my body, just like kids who take out their anger on someone's dog when they can’t get to the person directly. I saw that the government was foolish, scared like a woman alone with her silver spoons, and couldn’t tell its friends from its enemies. I lost all respect for it and started to feel sorry for it.

Thus the state never intentionally confronts a man’s sense, intellectual or moral, but only his body, his senses. It is not armed with superior wit or honesty, but with superior physical strength. I was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion. Let us see who is the strongest. What force has a multitude? They only can force me who obey a higher law than I. They force me to become like themselves. I do not hear of men being forced to live this way or that by masses of men. What sort of life were that to live? When I meet a government which says to me, “Your money or your life,” why should I be in haste to give it my money? It may be in a great strait, and not know what to do: I cannot help that. It must help itself; do as I do. It is not worth the while to snivel about it. I am not responsible for the successful working of the machinery of society. I am not the son of the engineer. I perceive that, when an acorn and a chestnut fall side by side, the one does not remain inert to make way for the other, but both obey their own laws, and spring and grow and flourish as best they can, till one, perchance, overshadows and destroys the other. If a plant cannot live according to its nature, it dies; and so a man.

So the state never directly challenges a person’s intellect or morals, but only their body and senses. It doesn’t have superior intelligence or integrity, but superior physical power. I wasn’t born to be compelled. I will live my life the way I choose. Let’s see who’s stronger. What power does a crowd have? Only those who follow a higher law than I can force me. They force me to conform to their ways. I don’t hear about people being forced to live a certain way by groups of people. What kind of life would that be? When I encounter a government that says to me, “Your money or your life,” why should I rush to hand over my money? It may be in a difficult situation and not know what to do; that’s not my problem. It has to take care of itself; it should act like I do. It’s not worth whining about. I am not responsible for how society's machinery operates successfully. I am not the engineer’s child. I notice that when an acorn and a chestnut fall next to each other, neither stays still to make way for the other, but both follow their own paths, growing and thriving as best they can, until one, perhaps, overshadows and eliminates the other. If a plant can’t live according to its nature, it dies; and the same goes for a person.

The night in prison was novel and interesting enough. The prisoners in their shirt-sleeves were enjoying a chat and the evening air in the door-way, when I entered. But the jailer said, “Come, boys, it is time to lock up;” and so they dispersed, and I heard the sound of their steps returning into the hollow apartments. My room-mate was introduced to me by the jailer as “a first-rate fellow and a clever man.” When the door was locked, he showed me where to hang my hat, and how he managed matters there. The rooms were whitewashed once a month; and this one, at least, was the whitest, most simply furnished, and probably the neatest apartment in town. He naturally wanted to know where I came from, and what brought me there; and, when I had told him, I asked him in my turn how he came there, presuming him to be an honest man, of course; and, as the world goes, I believe he was. “Why,” said he, “they accuse me of burning a barn; but I never did it.” As near as I could discover, he had probably gone to bed in a barn when drunk, and smoked his pipe there; and so a barn was burnt. He had the reputation of being a clever man, had been there some three months waiting for his trial to come on, and would have to wait as much longer; but he was quite domesticated and contented, since he got his board for nothing, and thought that he was well treated.

The night in prison was pretty new and interesting. The prisoners, in their shirt sleeves, were chatting and enjoying the evening air in the doorway when I walked in. But the jailer said, “Come on, guys, it’s time to lock up,” and they scattered, their footsteps echoing back into the empty rooms. The jailer introduced my roommate as “a great guy and a smart man.” Once the door was locked, he showed me where to hang my hat and how things worked there. The rooms were painted white once a month, and this one, at least, was the cleanest, simplest, and probably the nicest room in town. He naturally wanted to know where I was from and why I was there; after I told him, I asked him how he ended up there, assuming he was an honest guy, and I think he was. “Well,” he said, “they say I burned down a barn, but I didn’t do it.” As far as I could figure, he probably passed out in a barn while drunk and smoked his pipe there, which led to a barn burning. He was known as a smart guy, had been in there for about three months waiting for his trial, and would have to wait at least as long again; but he was pretty settled and content since his meals were free, and he thought he was treated well.

He occupied one window, and I the other; and I saw, that, if one stayed there long, his principal business would be to look out the window. I had soon read all the tracts that were left there, and examined where former prisoners had broken out, and where a grate had been sawed off, and heard the history of the various occupants of that room; for I found that even here there was a history and a gossip which never circulated beyond the walls of the jail. Probably this is the only house in the town where verses are composed, which are afterward printed in a circular form, but not published. I was shown quite a long list of verses which were composed by some young men who had been detected in an attempt to escape, who avenged themselves by singing them.

He took one window, and I took the other; and I noticed that if someone spent a lot of time there, their main focus would be looking out the window. I quickly read all the pamphlets that were left there, checked where previous inmates had managed to break out, and where a grate had been sawed off, and I heard the stories of the different people who had occupied that room; I found that even here there was a history and gossip that never went beyond the jail's walls. This is probably the only place in town where poems are written, which are later printed in circulars but never published. I was shown a pretty long list of poems created by some young guys who had been caught trying to escape, and they got back at their situation by singing them.

I pumped my fellow-prisoner as dry as I could, for fear I should never see him again; but at length he showed me which was my bed, and left me to blow out the lamp.

I drained my fellow prisoner as much as I could, fearing I might never see him again; but eventually he pointed out which was my bed and left me to put out the lamp.

It was like travelling into a far country, such as I had never expected to behold, to lie there for one night. It seemed to me that I never had heard the town-clock strike before, nor the evening sounds of the village; for we slept with the windows open, which were inside the grating. It was to see my native village in the light of the Middle Ages, and our Concord was turned into a Rhine stream, and visions of knights and castles passed before me. They were the voices of old burghers that I heard in the streets. I was an involuntary spectator and auditor of whatever was done and said in the kitchen of the adjacent village-inn—a wholly new and rare experience to me. It was a closer view of my native town. I was fairly inside of it. I never had seen its institutions before. This is one of its peculiar institutions; for it is a shire town. I began to comprehend what its inhabitants were about.

It felt like traveling to a distant place I never imagined I would see, just to stay for one night. It seemed I had never heard the town clock strike before or the evening sounds of the village; we slept with the windows open, which were behind the grating. It was like seeing my hometown through the lens of the Middle Ages, and our Concord turned into a Rhine stream, with visions of knights and castles flashing before me. I heard the voices of old townspeople in the streets. I was an unwilling observer and listener to everything happening in the kitchen of the nearby inn—a completely new and rare experience for me. I got a closer look at my hometown. I was right inside it. I had never seen its institutions before. This is one of its unique institutions; after all, it is a shire town. I started to understand what its residents were up to.

In the morning, our breakfasts were put through the hole in the door, in small oblong-square tin pans, made to fit, and holding a pint of chocolate, with brown bread, and an iron spoon. When they called for the vessels again, I was green enough to return what bread I had left; but my comrade seized it, and said that I should lay that up for lunch or dinner. Soon after, he was let out to work at haying in a neighboring field, whither he went every day, and would not be back till noon; so he bade me good-day, saying that he doubted if he should see me again.

In the morning, our breakfasts were slid through the hole in the door, in small rectangular tin pans designed to fit, holding a pint of hot chocolate, with some brown bread and an iron spoon. When they called for the pans back, I was naïve enough to return any bread I had left; but my friend grabbed it and told me to save it for lunch or dinner. Shortly after, he was taken out to work in a nearby field haying, where he went every day and wouldn’t be back until noon; so he wished me a good day, saying he wasn’t sure if he would see me again.

When I came out of prison,—for some one interfered, and paid the tax,—I did not perceive that great changes had taken place on the common, such as he observed who went in a youth, and emerged a gray-headed man; and yet a change had to my eyes come over the scene,—the town, and State, and country,—greater than any that mere time could effect. I saw yet more distinctly the State in which I lived. I saw to what extent the people among whom I lived could be trusted as good neighbors and friends; that their friendship was for summer weather only; that they did not greatly purpose to do right; that they were a distinct race from me by their prejudices and superstitions, as the Chinamen and Malays are; that, in their sacrifices to humanity they ran no risks, not even to their property; that, after all, they were not so noble but they treated the thief as he had treated them, and hoped, by a certain outward observance and a few prayers, and by walking in a particular straight though useless path from time to time, to save their souls. This may be to judge my neighbors harshly; for I believe that most of them are not aware that they have such an institution as the jail in their village.

When I got out of prison—thanks to someone who stepped in and paid my tax—I didn’t realize how much had changed in the community, like someone who goes in as a young person and comes out as an old man; yet, in my eyes, there was a shift in the entire scene—the town, the state, and the country—that was greater than anything time alone could bring about. I saw more clearly the state I lived in. I understood better how much I could trust the people around me as neighbors and friends; their friendship was only for the good times; they didn’t really plan to do the right thing; they were a distinct group from me, divided by their biases and superstitions, just like the Chinese and Malays are; they didn’t take any real risks in their sacrifices for humanity, not even concerning their property; they weren't as noble as they thought, treating a thief the way he treated them, and hoping that, by following a certain ritual and saying a few prayers, and walking a specific, though pointless, path from time to time, they could save their souls. I might be judging my neighbors too harshly; I believe most of them don’t even realize that there’s a jail in their village.

It was formerly the custom in our village, when a poor debtor came out of jail, for his acquaintances to salute him, looking through their fingers, which were crossed to represent the grating of a jail window, “How do ye do?” My neighbors did not thus salute me, but first looked at me, and then at one another, as if I had returned from a long journey. I was put into jail as I was going to the shoemaker’s to get a shoe which was mended. When I was let out the next morning, I proceeded to finish my errand, and, having put on my mended shoe, joined a huckleberry party, who were impatient to put themselves under my conduct; and in half an hour,—for the horse was soon tackled,—was in the midst of a huckleberry field, on one of our highest hills, two miles off; and then the State was nowhere to be seen.

It used to be a tradition in our village that when a poor debtor got out of jail, their friends would greet them by looking through their fingers crossed like a jail window and saying, “How’s it going?” My neighbors didn’t greet me that way. Instead, they first looked at me and then at each other, as if I had returned from a long trip. I had been put in jail while I was on my way to the shoemaker’s to pick up a repaired shoe. When I was released the next morning, I continued my errand, and after putting on my mended shoe, I joined a group of people picking huckleberries, who were eager to follow my lead. In half an hour—since the horse was quickly hitched up—we were in the middle of a huckleberry field on one of our highest hills, two miles away; at that point, the State felt far away.

This is the whole history of “My Prisons.”

This is the complete story of "My Prisons."

I have never declined paying the highway tax, because I am as desirous of being a good neighbor as I am of being a bad subject; and, as for supporting schools, I am doing my part to educate my fellow-countrymen now. It is for no particular item in the tax-bill that I refuse to pay it. I simply wish to refuse allegiance to the State, to withdraw and stand aloof from it effectually. I do not care to trace the course of my dollar, if I could, till it buys a man, or a musket to shoot one with,—the dollar is innocent,—but I am concerned to trace the effects of my allegiance. In fact, I quietly declare war with the State, after my fashion, though I will still make use and get what advantages of her I can, as is usual in such cases.

I’ve never refused to pay the highway tax because I want to be a good neighbor just as much as I want to avoid being a bad citizen. As for supporting schools, I’m already doing my part to educate my fellow countrymen. I’m not against paying any specific item on the tax bill; I just want to withdraw my allegiance from the State and effectively stand apart from it. I don’t care to follow my dollar’s journey, even if I could, until it ends up buying a person or a gun to harm someone with—the dollar itself isn’t the problem—but I do care about the impact of my loyalty. In a way, I’m quietly declaring war on the State, while still taking advantage of what it offers, as is typical in these situations.

If others pay the tax which is demanded of me, from a sympathy with the State, they do but what they have already done in their own case, or rather they abet injustice to a greater extent than the State requires. If they pay the tax from a mistaken interest in the individual taxed, to save his property or prevent his going to jail, it is because they have not considered wisely how far they let their private feelings interfere with the public good.

If others pay the tax that’s demanded of me out of sympathy for the State, they’re just doing what they’ve already done for themselves, or they’re actually supporting injustice more than the State needs. If they pay the tax to wrongly help the individual being taxed, to save his property or keep him out of jail, it’s because they haven’t thought carefully about how much they let their personal feelings get in the way of the greater good.

This, then, is my position at present. But one cannot be too much on his guard in such a case, lest his actions be biassed by obstinacy, or an undue regard for the opinions of men. Let him see that he does only what belongs to himself and to the hour.

This is where I stand right now. However, one must be careful in this situation, so that their actions aren't influenced by stubbornness or by caring too much about what others think. They should focus on doing what is right for themselves and the moment.

I think sometimes, Why, this people mean well; they are only ignorant; they would do better if they knew how: why give your neighbors this pain to treat you as they are not inclined to? But I think, again, this is no reason why I should do as they do, or permit others to suffer much greater pain of a different kind. Again, I sometimes say to myself, When many millions of men, without heat, without ill-will, without personal feeling of any kind, demand of you a few shillings only, without the possibility, such is their constitution, of retracting or altering their present demand, and without the possibility, on your side, of appeal to any other millions, why expose yourself to this overwhelming brute force? You do not resist cold and hunger, the winds and the waves, thus obstinately; you quietly submit to a thousand similar necessities. You do not put your head into the fire. But just in proportion as I regard this as not wholly a brute force, but partly a human force, and consider that I have relations to those millions as to so many millions of men, and not of mere brute or inanimate things, I see that appeal is possible, first and instantaneously, from them to the Maker of them, and, secondly, from them to themselves. But, if I put my head deliberately into the fire, there is no appeal to fire or to the Maker of fire, and I have only myself to blame. If I could convince myself that I have any right to be satisfied with men as they are, and to treat them accordingly, and not according, in some respects, to my requisitions and expectations of what they and I ought to be, then, like a good Mussulman and fatalist, I should endeavor to be satisfied with things as they are, and say it is the will of God. And, above all, there is this difference between resisting this and a purely brute or natural force, that I can resist this with some effect; but I cannot expect, like Orpheus, to change the nature of the rocks and trees and beasts.

I sometimes think, "These people mean well; they're just ignorant; they would act differently if they knew how. Why give your neighbors this pain and expect them to treat you differently than they naturally would?" But then I reconsider, realizing that this isn’t a good enough reason for me to act like they do or to let others experience much greater pain of a different kind. I also tell myself, "When millions of people, without anger, without malice, and without any personal feelings at all, ask you for just a few coins, knowing they can’t retract or change their request and you can’t turn to other millions for help, why put yourself in the path of this overwhelming force?" You don't fight against cold or hunger, the wind or the waves, with such stubbornness; you accept a thousand similar necessities. You don't willingly step into a fire. But as much as I see this not just as brute force but partly as human force, and recognize my connection to those millions as fellow human beings rather than mere brute entities, I understand that there is an appeal possible, first and foremost, to the Creator, and secondly, to themselves. However, if I deliberately step into the fire, there's no one to appeal to—neither the fire nor its Maker—and I can only blame myself. If I could convince myself that I have any right to be satisfied with people as they are and to treat them accordingly, rather than based on my own expectations of what they and I should be, then, like a good Muslim and fatalist, I would try to be accepting of things as they are and say it’s the will of God. Furthermore, the key difference between resisting this and a purely natural force is that I can resist this with some effect; unlike Orpheus, I can't expect to change the nature of rocks, trees, and animals.

I do not wish to quarrel with any man or nation. I do not wish to split hairs, to make fine distinctions, or set myself up as better than my neighbors. I seek rather, I may say, even an excuse for conforming to the laws of the land. I am but too ready to conform to them. Indeed I have reason to suspect myself on this head; and each year, as the tax-gatherer comes round, I find myself disposed to review the acts and position of the general and state governments, and the spirit of the people to discover a pretext for conformity.

I don't want to argue with anyone or any country. I don’t want to nitpick, make unnecessary distinctions, or act like I'm superior to my neighbors. Instead, I’m looking for a reason to follow the laws of the land. I’m more than willing to do so. In fact, I often question myself about this; and every year, when the tax collector comes around, I feel inclined to reconsider the actions and stance of the federal and state governments, along with the attitudes of the people, to find a justification for going along with things.

“We must affect our country as our parents,
And if at any time we alienate
Out love of industry from doing it honor,
We must respect effects and teach the soul
Matter of conscience and religion,
And not desire of rule or benefit.”

"We need to impact our country like our parents did,
And if at any point we lose
Our passion for hard work and honor,
We should respect the results and educate the spirit
About the importance of conscience and faith,
Not for the sake of power or personal gain."

I believe that the State will soon be able to take all my work of this sort out of my hands, and then I shall be no better patriot than my fellow-countrymen. Seen from a lower point of view, the Constitution, with all its faults, is very good; the law and the courts are very respectable; even this State and this American government are, in many respects, very admirable, and rare things, to be thankful for, such as a great many have described them; seen from a higher still, and the highest, who shall say what they are, or that they are worth looking at or thinking of at all?

I believe that the government will soon be able to take all my work like this off my hands, and then I won’t be any better a patriot than my fellow citizens. From a simpler perspective, the Constitution, despite its flaws, is quite good; the laws and the courts are quite respectable; even this state and this American government are, in many ways, admirable and valuable, as many have noted; viewed from an even higher perspective, who can say what they truly are, or if they’re even worth considering at all?

However, the government does not concern me much, and I shall bestow the fewest possible thoughts on it. It is not many moments that I live under a government, even in this world. If a man is thought-free, fancy-free, imagination-free, that which is not never for a long time appearing to be to him, unwise rulers or reformers cannot fatally interrupt him.

However, the government doesn't bother me much, and I'll spend the least amount of time thinking about it. I don’t spend many moments living under a government, even in this world. If someone is carefree, free of worries, and not caught up in fantasies, what truly is not never seems to be for long to them, so foolish leaders or reformers can't really disrupt them.

I know that most men think differently from myself; but those whose lives are by profession devoted to the study of these or kindred subjects content me as little as any. Statesmen and legislators, standing so completely within the institution, never distinctly and nakedly behold it. They speak of moving society, but have no resting-place without it. They may be men of a certain experience and discrimination, and have no doubt invented ingenious and even useful systems, for which we sincerely thank them; but all their wit and usefulness lie within certain not very wide limits. They are wont to forget that the world is not governed by policy and expediency. Webster never goes behind government, and so cannot speak with authority about it. His words are wisdom to those legislators who contemplate no essential reform in the existing government; but for thinkers, and those who legislate for all time, he never once glances at the subject. I know of those whose serene and wise speculations on this theme would soon reveal the limits of his mind’s range and hospitality. Yet, compared with the cheap professions of most reformers, and the still cheaper wisdom and eloquence of politicians in general, his are almost the only sensible and valuable words, and we thank Heaven for him. Comparatively, he is always strong, original, and, above all, practical. Still his quality is not wisdom, but prudence. The lawyer’s truth is not Truth, but consistency or a consistent expediency. Truth is always in harmony with herself, and is not concerned chiefly to reveal the justice that may consist with wrong-doing. He well deserves to be called, as he has been called, the Defender of the Constitution. There are really no blows to be given by him but defensive ones. He is not a leader, but a follower. His leaders are the men of ’87. “I have never made an effort,” he says, “and never propose to make an effort; I have never countenanced an effort, and never mean to countenance an effort, to disturb the arrangement as originally made, by which the various States came into the Union.” Still thinking of the sanction which the Constitution gives to slavery, he says, “Because it was part of the original compact,—let it stand.” Notwithstanding his special acuteness and ability, he is unable to take a fact out of its merely political relations, and behold it as it lies absolutely to be disposed of by the intellect,—what, for instance, it behoves a man to do here in America today with regard to slavery, but ventures, or is driven, to make some such desperate answer as the following, while professing to speak absolutely, and as a private man,—from which what new and singular code of social duties might be inferred?—“The manner,” says he, “in which the governments of those States where slavery exists are to regulate it, is for their own consideration, under the responsibility to their constituents, to the general laws of propriety, humanity, and justice, and to God. Associations formed elsewhere, springing from a feeling of humanity, or any other cause, have nothing whatever to do with it. They have never received any encouragement from me and they never will.”

I know that most people think differently from me, but those who are professionally dedicated to studying these topics or similar ones don’t satisfy me any more than anyone else. Statesmen and lawmakers, who are so immersed in the institution, never truly see it for what it is. They talk about changing society, but they can't imagine a world without it. They might be experienced and discerning and have undoubtedly created clever and even useful systems, for which we genuinely appreciate them; but all their intelligence and usefulness stay within pretty narrow limits. They tend to forget that the world isn't governed solely by policy and practicality. Webster never looks beyond government, so he can’t speak authoritatively about it. His words are wise for those lawmakers who see no need for significant change in the current government; but for thinkers, and those who legislate for all time, he never touches on the topic. I know people whose calm and insightful ideas on this subject would quickly show the limits of his intellectual reach and openness. Yet, compared to the empty promises of most reformers and the even cheaper wisdom and rhetoric of politicians in general, his words are among the few that are sensible and valuable, and we’re grateful for him. In comparison, he is always strong, original, and, above all, practical. Still, his strength is not wisdom, but caution. A lawyer’s truth is not Truth but rather consistency or a consistent practicality. Truth is always consistent with itself and isn’t mainly focused on revealing the justice that might coexist with wrongdoing. He rightly earns the title of "Defender of the Constitution." There are no real attacks he launches, only defensive ones. He is not a leader but a follower. His leaders are the men of ’87. “I have never made an effort,” he says, “and never plan to; I have never supported an effort, and never intend to support any effort, to change the arrangement as it was originally established, by which the various States came into the Union.” Still considering the approval that the Constitution gives to slavery, he says, “Because it was part of the original agreement—let it remain.” Despite his keen insight and ability, he cannot separate a fact from its mere political context and see it for what it is, as it should be examined by the intellect—like what a person ought to do about slavery in America today. He resorts to making a desperate statement like the following while claiming to speak definitively and as an individual—what new and unique set of social responsibilities could be drawn from this?—“The way the governments of States where slavery exists should manage it is their own concern, accountable to their constituents, to the general principles of decency, compassion, and justice, and to God. Groups formed elsewhere, based on feelings of compassion, or any other reason, have nothing to do with it. They have never had my support and they never will.”

They who know of no purer sources of truth, who have traced up its stream no higher, stand, and wisely stand, by the Bible and the Constitution, and drink at it there with reverence and humanity; but they who behold where it comes trickling into this lake or that pool, gird up their loins once more, and continue their pilgrimage toward its fountain-head.

Those who are unaware of any clearer sources of truth, and who haven't explored its origins further, wisely choose to rely on the Bible and the Constitution, and they approach them with respect and compassion; however, those who see where it flows into this lake or that pool prepare themselves again and keep moving toward its source.

No man with a genius for legislation has appeared in America. They are rare in the history of the world. There are orators, politicians, and eloquent men, by the thousand; but the speaker has not yet opened his mouth to speak who is capable of settling the much-vexed questions of the day. We love eloquence for its own sake, and not for any truth which it may utter, or any heroism it may inspire. Our legislators have not yet learned the comparative value of free-trade and of freedom, of union, and of rectitude, to a nation. They have no genius or talent for comparatively humble questions of taxation and finance, commerce and manufactures and agriculture. If we were left solely to the wordy wit of legislators in Congress for our guidance, uncorrected by the seasonable experience and the effectual complaints of the people, America would not long retain her rank among the nations. For eighteen hundred years, though perchance I have no right to say it, the New Testament has been written; yet where is the legislator who has wisdom and practical talent enough to avail himself of the light which it sheds on the science of legislation.

No man with a talent for making laws has emerged in America. Such individuals are rare throughout history. There are countless speakers, politicians, and persuasive individuals; however, the person who can truly address the complicated issues of today has yet to step forward. We appreciate eloquence for its own sake, not for any truth it may convey or any inspiration it might offer. Our lawmakers have not yet grasped the relative importance of free trade, freedom, unity, and integrity for a nation. They lack the insight or skill to tackle even the simpler issues of taxation, finance, commerce, manufacturing, and agriculture. If we were to rely solely on the flowery speeches of politicians in Congress for our guidance, without the corrective influence of timely experiences and the genuine concerns of the people, America would soon lose its place among the nations. For eighteen hundred years, although I may not be in a position to say so, the New Testament has existed; yet where is the lawmaker who possesses the wisdom and practical skills to utilize the insights it provides on the art of legislation?

The authority of government, even such as I am willing to submit to,—for I will cheerfully obey those who know and can do better than I, and in many things even those who neither know nor can do so well,—is still an impure one: to be strictly just, it must have the sanction and consent of the governed. It can have no pure right over my person and property but what I concede to it. The progress from an absolute to a limited monarchy, from a limited monarchy to a democracy, is a progress toward a true respect for the individual. Even the Chinese philosopher was wise enough to regard the individual as the basis of the empire. Is a democracy, such as we know it, the last improvement possible in government? Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man? There will never be a really free and enlightened State, until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly. I please myself with imagining a State at last which can afford to be just to all men, and to treat the individual with respect as a neighbor; which even would not think it inconsistent with its own repose, if a few were to live aloof from it, not meddling with it, nor embraced by it, who fulfilled all the duties of neighbors and fellow-men. A State which bore this kind of fruit, and suffered it to drop off as fast as it ripened, would prepare the way for a still more perfect and glorious State, which also I have imagined, but not yet anywhere seen.

The authority of government, even the kind I'm willing to accept—because I'm happy to follow those who know and can do better than I can, and even those who don't know or do as well in many cases—is still flawed: to be truly just, it must have the approval and consent of the people. It can only have legitimate power over my person and property if I give it that right. Progressing from an absolute to a limited monarchy, and from a limited monarchy to a democracy, is a move toward true respect for the individual. Even the Chinese philosopher understood that the individual is the foundation of the empire. Is democracy, as we know it, the final improvement we can make in government? Is it not possible to go even further in recognizing and organizing human rights? There won't be a genuinely free and enlightened state until it acknowledges the individual as a higher, independent power from which all its own power and authority comes, and treats that individual accordingly. I like to envision a state that can finally afford to be just to everyone and treat individuals with respect as neighbors; one that would not find it inconsistent with its own peace if a few people choose to live apart from it, not interfering with it, nor being included by it, while still fulfilling all their responsibilities as neighbors and fellow citizens. A state that bore this kind of fruit and allowed it to drop as soon as it ripened would pave the way for an even more perfect and wonderful state, which I've also imagined but haven't seen anywhere yet.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!